Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC October 15, 1985 - CITY of ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - OCTOBER 15, 1985 REVISED AGENDA 1. Call to order - 7:30 p.m. 2. Resident Forum 3. Agend a Approval 4. Discussion Items a. Roger Junglen Lot Split b. Hunting Ordinance/Boundary Change Consideration c. Electrical Bids/Cold Storage Building d. 181st Avenue/Section 1 Discussion é. Nuisance Ordinance, Continued *f. Order Feasibility, Updated Project 85-13/Russel/Stack Storm Drainage *g. Correction/Lot Split/A. Aker *h. Good Value Sketch Plan/Coon Creek Area i. 5. Non-Discussion Items a. Change Order No. 1/IP85-9/Well b. Award Bids IP85-16/Water & Sewer/Sipe & Lawrence c. Award Bids IP85-9/Pumphouse - IP85-10/Water Tower *d. Special Meeting/Canvass Special Election Results e. 6. Reports of Committees a. Fire Department 1) Purchase Video Equipment 2) Physicals 3) Oath for Members *b. Personnel Committee - Clerk/Treasurer Job Description/Advertisement 7. Approval of Minutes 8. Approval of Claims 9. Ad j ou rnmen t *Not on published Agenda CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council COPIES TO: City Clerk; City Attorney ð) FROM: James E. Schrantz Cit En ineer DATE: October II 1985 REFERENCE: Aqenda Comments - lO/l5/85 Heetinq Item No. 3 - Agenda Approval Please add items 4f, 4g, 4h, 5d and 6b as shown on the revised agenda by an asterisk. Please remove Item 4c. We are still waiting on quotes. Items 4d (18lst Avenue Discussion) and 4f (Nuisance Ordinance) are continued from lO/1/85. Items 5b and 5c - bids are being prepared and information will have to be a handout. Item 7 - Approval of Hinutes August 20 Regular; September 3 Regular; September l2 Special; September l7 Regular; september l8 Special; September 24 Special; October 1 Regular; October 1 Closed. JES:vv ~ 01 ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - OCTOBER 15, 1985 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Jerry Windschitl on October 15, 1985, 7:30 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Councilmen present: Elling, Knight, Lachinski, Orttel Councilmen absent: None Also present: City Attorney, John Burke (arrived at 9:20); City Engineer, James Schrantz; and others AGENDA. APPROVAL MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Elling, that we approve the Agenda as published wlth the following additions and deletions: Add Items 4f, Order Feasibility, Updated Project 85-13/Russell/Stack Storm Drainage; 4g, Correction/Lot Split/A. Aker; 4h, Good Value Sketch Plan/Coon Creek Area; 4i, Water Problems/Dehn's Addition; 5d, Special Meeting/Canvass Special Election Results; 6b, Personnel Committee; and deletion of Item 4c, Electrical Bids/Cold Storage Building. Motion carried unanimously. ROGER JUNGLEN LOT SPLIT Don Jacobson, Chairman of the Planning Commission, reviewed the request for a lot split and the Commission's recommendation to deny that request. Roger Junglen - presented a copy of his intent to divide his property, stating some day he lS wanting to construct a house on the back acreage. He explained he talked with the City Engineer several months ago and was told he could construct a road back to that parcel as long as it is done at the time the building permit is pulled. He had no objection to that. The only objection he has is having to tar the road for one house, feeling it ~lOuld cost $10,000 to $15,000 to do that. And it is not worth it for one house. He would be willing to do that if the person on the west wants to use that road and would reimburse him for that share. But Mr. Junglen didn't feel the property owner next to him would be willing to divide that parcel and participate in the construction of a road. But he stated he would be willing to ask his neighbor. He felt since he is willing to put in the road that the lot split should be allowed, that it would not be a landlocked lot. Chairman Jacobson stated the Commission had no problem with the request if the easement was dedicated to the City and a road constructed to City . standards. With it remaining an easement, the property could change ownership and that lot could be left without any road frontage. The Council agreed there would be no problem if the road were built up to present standards, acknowledging that variances would be needed for lot width and length of the cuI de sac. But it was felt those variances would not be a problem. Mr. Junglen - stated he was willing to work with the Council, noting he needs to have thlS lot split off because of some contract for deeds he has to payoff very soon. The bank has told him it would be best to split the property now rather than later after there is a loan on the property. Council felt its hands were tied at this point, that it would not be a legal lot without a standard road constructed to it. The easement would have to be dedicated to the City for roadway, drainage, and utility purposes. Mr. Jun¡len - stated he is willing to dedicate the easement, but he didn't see the reason or having to put in the road right away. Council stated the City needs assurance that the road will get built, asking if he would be willing to post a bond to be sure the job gets done. Regular City Council Meeting October 15, 1985 - Minutes Page 2 (Roger Junglen Lot Split, Continued) Mr. Jun~len - felt the City would not have to issue a building permit on that property untll t e road is constructed. He would build the road prior to applying for the building permit. Council noted the problem is once the split is approved, it :becomes a legal lot; and should that parcel be sold, that~erson would have the right to build on it. Mr. JunElen - stated because this only serves his property, he would be willing to put ln lass 5 now and tar it at the time the building permit is issued. Council again noted the difficulty of putting conditions on the lot split and future building, that with the lot split ordinances it is not intended to circumvent the platting requirements. MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Lachinski, a Resolution denying a lot split for Roger Junglen for property identified as PIN 25 32 24 41 0007, lying south of Andover Boulevard in the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 25, as presented. DISCUSS ION: Council suggested Mr. Junglen talk with the neighboring property owner to see if something can't be worked out ragarding access across his property or joint construction of a road. Mr. JUnålen - didn't believe his neighbor would be willing to do that, but he stated he woul dlscussit. He asked what if he would supply a bond for the construction of the road. Council felt in all likelihood the split would be approved, again noting the variances that would be needed. Mr. Junglen - stated he didn't need the road right now, asking why that lot just couldn't stay there until the building permit is requested. Council again noted the difficulty to the City if the property were sold and it was a legal lot of record. Mr. Junglen - then stated he would contact his attorney and asked to have the item tabled to the next meeting. Councilmen Lachinski and Elling WITHDREW the Second and the Motion. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Elling, to table it to the next regular meeting. Motion carrled unanimously. HUNTING ORDINANCE/BOUNDARY CHANGE CONSIDERATION Council noted the boundary line in question is that part of Seventh Avenue and the plats to the north of 149th and Round Lake wher.e the present hunting boundary is drawn. When that boundary was determined, there were no plats north of 149th. Cecil Chesser, 15520 Qua¥ Street, Lake Rid~e - is concerned ~Iith the sign located on Round Lake Boulevard ln the center portlon of the lake stating "No hunting south of here". He felt it implies that there is hunting north of there and that hunters are not aware of the ordinance requirements. He stated there is a lot of hunting in his area and he is concerned about walking the streets with people hunting so close by. He stated he'd like to see Lake Ridge included in the no hunting area. Council discussion noted the existing ordinance clearly restricts hunting within specific distances from residential areas and in city parks. But they felt it makes sense to move the boundary even further north to encompass the developments in the no hunting zone, because "no hunting" signs can be deceiving, especially if the hunter is not familiar with the ordinance. It was also noted at the time the boundary was drawn up, the DNR didn't want the lake closed to hunting completely. But given the development around the lake at this time, it may be time to reconsider it. Regular City Council Meeting October 15, 1985 - Minutes Page 3 (Hunting Ordinance/Bou~dary Change Consideration, Continued) Brian Nystrom, 4075 149th Avenue - noted he is the one who brought this before the Council at the last meeting, repeating an incident of a hunter shooting out of season just behind his property. He felt it is time to change the hunting boundary, that the urban area is spreadingfurthennorth, recognizing it is a clash with the rural character of Andover. But he did not want to see anyone accidentally shot, stating he is in favor of extending the boundary on 149th further north. He stated he also thinks the signs are misleading, thinking the hunters generally do not take the time to study the ordinances. Council thought a logical northern boundary in this area would be County Road 20, but noted there are developments just to the north of that road that could be included as well. Or a defined corridor all the way up County Road g could be defined. Councilman Knight didn't know whether the City wanted to prohibit bow hunting in these areas as well, noting they are very limited in range. Council generally agreed to have the committee which originally drafted the hunting oridnance look at this and make a recommendation to the Council. A suggestion was also to post no hunting signs in the park. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Orttel, that we refer to the Committee that dealt with this before for restudy, and to look at the question of bow and arrow hunting also. DISCUSSION: Councilman Elling felt if the lake were closed to hunting, it would solve the problem and would still keep in tact what was trying to be accomplished by the ordinance. Mayor Windschitl felt the logical boundary would be County Road 20 on the north in order to close off the lake and those developments just above it. Councilman Elling thought if the boundary went around those developments, that same thing would have to be done around developments allover the City or it isn't a uniform ordinance. VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Knight, Lachinski, Orttel, Windschitl; NO-Elling Motion carried. CORRECT/LOT SPLIT/A. AKER MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Knight, a Resolution rescinding Resolution R091-85 adopted by the City Council on September 3, 1985. (See Resolution R128-85) Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Lachinski, introducing a Resolution approving a Lot Split as requested by Arnie Aker for the revision of Plat 65902, Parcel 3010, PIN 02 32 24 22 0002. (See Resolution R129-85) Motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCE FEASIBILITY, UPDATED PROJECT 85-13/RUSSEU/5TACK STORM DRAINAGE Mayor Windschitl explained since the public hearing there has been a series of meetings involving residents and City staff trying to resolve the easement question. At this point the easement question is not resolved, and the only alternative the City has if it cannot be solved is to reinstate the 429 proceedings. Mr. Schrantz reviewed the easement proposal just submitted by Clyde Russell for the construction along the northern side of his property, piped all the way to the river. Clyde Russell - stated the agreement written up by the City would be okay with him lf lt works. But he felt he needed an alternative, some recourse if it doesn't work. Mayor Windschitl stated the difficulty the City is having with the northern route is the expense. It would be extremely expensive to go that route and could not be done without the 429 procedure and assessing those costs. The agreement written by the City was to indemnify Mr. Russell if the project didn't work. Regular City Council Meeting October 15, 1985 - Minutes Page 4 (Russell/Stack Storm Drainage, Continued) Mr. Russell - understood the City's point. But he didn't think the City's agreement sald he would be indemnified. Mayor Windschitl stated it was written such because the City has no guarantee it will get the permits necessary to get to the river for either route. Mr. Russell - felt the $800 amount in the City's original agreement was not sufficient. He rents the land for $1,000 a year. A lengthy discussion continued with Mr. Russell trying to negotiate an agreement with him for easement over his property to drain the vicinity of the Russell/Stack Addition. Mr. Schrantz explined by using the southern route, he felt the water would drain down into the owbow area, which could hold a great deal of water. If the owbow can no longer hold the water and if the proper permits have not or cannot be attained, he felt he would be able to pump from the oxbow over the bank into the river, which is not a great distance. If the permits can be attained, he would pipe the last 50 feet from the oxbow to the river. He preferred the southern route. Mike Estey - suggested the Council look at their proposal. And if for some reason the project doesn't work after 1986, then the City could look into the 429 proceedings to take the northern route and go to the river. Council felt it would be more acceptable to the residents if the 429 proceedings were done at this time rather than two years from now when the problem may not be as apparent or as urgent to them. But foremost they preferred getting the project done without going the 429 route so that it can be done economically and done yet this fall. They also felt that is what the agreement drawn up by the City Attorney states. Mr. Schrantz stated if the south route doesn't work, it will be because the City is not able to obtain the necessary permits to go to the river. In that case, the northern route wouldn't work either for that same reason. Al Joslyn, Yakima - asked why the City wouldn't sign the letter drawn up for Mr. Russell by Bob Johnson. Council noted it is the cost factor to go the northern route, and it is the opinion of the City that the southern route would be the most feasible. The intent would be that the southern route would work and that a 429 procedure would'not be needed. Mr. Russell then agreed to provide a permanent easement fordrainage~urposes via the southern route, which is what the engineer and Council felt would be the most feasible route to take. Mr. Russell agreed to forego any potential loss on the field for the year 1986. Any damage to the field beyond that time would mean the City would rent the property from Mr. Russell for $1,000 per year of occurrence. Also, the City would not damage the crop on the field right now. It is the Council's intent that this project would be completed within two years, that is the proper permits would be attained to drain to the Rum River and construction completed. It is hoped once the City has access to the river and the area is drained that there will not be a problem any more. If the southern route does not work, 429 proceedings would be initiated to change to the northern route. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Lachinski, that the Council approve the wording in the easement transaction with Clyde and Mary Russell as follows: that the dollar amount per year of rent that we would pay for the property would be $1,000, and that a statement at the end of the description be inserted stating that the 1985 crop in the field will not be damaged by any use of the easement; and authorize the Mayor and Clerk to sign that document. Motion carried unanimously. Council recessed at 9:02; reconvened at 9:10 p.m. Regular City Council Meeting October 15, 1985 - Minutes Page 5 WATER PROBLEMS/DEHN'S ADDITION The Council, City Engineer, and residents present reviewed the draft of the Anoka County Road 116 drainage study, which recommended the water be carried along the road ditches to the south, through the City of Anoka, and ultimately out to the Rum River. The estimated cost of the project is $200,000. Mr. Schrantz stated this report will be discussed with the county and the cities involved before the County Commissioners act on it. Council and residents were delighted that an attempt is being made to solve this problem. GOOD VALUE SKETCH PLAN/COON CREEK AREA John Peterson of Good Vâlue Homes reviewed a sketch plan of 188 acres just south of the intersection of Crosstown and Bunker Lake Boulevards, noting there would be 408 lots in the development. He explained they have designed the plat to save as many of the trees as possible, pointing out some of the amenities of the property. Mr. Peterson noted the one area of concern was the county proposal to move Crooked Lake Boulevard to the east side of the creek through this proeprty. After consideration, Good Value has decided it would take away from the development to have a collector road cut through it, so they have designed the plat only with interior streets. They plan to develop in stages beginning with the northwest corner, then going to the south and east. Mr. Peterson also explained that Coon Rapids has expressed an interest in extending 133rd Avenue east and west as a collector road, which would encompass the southern edge of the plat. They don't feel it would be desirable for their plat to have 133rd as a major collector in that area because they would lose a lot of value in lots, and the lots would have to front on two sides. They are connecting to the south with roadways in positions suggested to them by the Coon Rapids planners. He thought there may be some concern of the traffic flow to the east. Council felt if the roads across the top and across the bottom are connected, the east-west traffic flow would be acceptable. They also felt that some of the streets should stub to the east for an eventual exit out to Hanson Boulevard. Mr. Peterson stated the third issue is 60 acres of the property on the east side is zoned industrial. They are hoping to plat it into residential, probably putting in some type of multiple-unit housing. The plat as shown is not in compliance with the zonimg because it shows single family. But their intent at this point would be to plat it for multiples. He noted the 40 acres to the east have not been assessed for water. Mayor Windschitl reported he understood the City of Coon Rapids hired a firm to determine whether an east-west corridor in this area would be best located at 131st or moved north to 133rd. The planner's recommendation was to keep it at 131st but to bypass certain problem areas. Mr. Peterson stated they are prepared to go to the Planning Commission and Park Board with this proposal. They are proposing park dedication of one-half land, one-half fees. At this point they feel the parkland could best be utilized for ballfields, etc. That is why they are proposing it be along Bunker Lake Boulevard. Also they would prefer to have the park in that location rather than houses along that street. He also stated there are a lot of unanswered questions regarding Coon Creek Watershed's policies. Good Value is proposing to go through the platting process this fall and winter and begin construction next spring. Council felt the utility construction should begin in the spring as well. They generally approved of the concept presented at this time. Regular City Council Meeting October 15, 1985 - Minutes Page 6 AWARD BIDS IP85-9/PUMPHOUSE and IP85-10/WATER TOWER Tom Kirt of TKDA presented their October 14, 1985, memo on the bids received for the elevated water storage tank. Style A, the fluted column type tank, was bid by Hydrostorage for a total of $485,100, which includes the alternate bid for an overhead, roll-up type garage door. Style B, the pedestal spheroid type tank, was bid by CBI Na-Con for a total of $418,900, which also includes the alternate bid. Mr. Kirt felt both bids were reasonable but recommended the pedestal spheroid type because the maintenance cost of that type is less than on the fluted column style. Mr. Kirt explained the bid and the alternate includes everything necessary to make the tank and room below functional and operational, such as the watermain servicing, access road, electrical service, overflow storm surface, etc. Representatives from the two firms were present and addressed the Council as to why they felt their particular style of water tank would best serve the City. Dean Bach of Hydrostorage - stated the fluted column type tank provides the greatest area for the service room at the base of the tank. He also didn't feel the maintenance costs would be much greater because of the additional time that would be required to do the additional rigging when painting the spheroid type. Brent Rupp, CBI Na-Con - showed a model of what the pedestal spheroid type tank would look like and showed photos of the many different designs that could be painted on this style to make it unique to the City. He also stated the cost to repaint this style would be about $17,000 less because there is about 17,000 square feet less surface to paint. He stated there are inverted rings to facilitate rigging the tank during painting, so it wouldn't take that much more time during maintenance. Also, the tank is smooth and easier to paint than the fluted style which has the convolutions on it. The room at the basewQ~ldbe the same as the fluted style except there would be a loss of area beginning at head height because of the taper. Council discussed both styles, agreeing that the storage room at the base should be constructed at the time the tower is being built. MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Orttel, that we adopt the bids for Type A for $485,100 WhlCh includes the storage area. (To Hydrostorage) (See Resolution R130-85) VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Elling, Orttel, Windschitl; NO-Knight, Lachinski as they preferred the looks of the pedestal spheroid type tank. Motion carried. Mr. Kirt then presented their October 14, 1985, letter on the bids received for Well #2 pumphouse, noting of the four bids received, preussen Construction was the low bidder. He stated the well should be completed by the end of this week. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, that we recognize bids for construction of Well #2 Pumphouse as presented by TKDA and note that we would award the construction of the wellhouse to Preussen Construction in the amount of $94,421. (See Resolution R131-85) Motion carried unanimously. ANDOVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT - PHYSICALS Firefighter Tom Miller explained he has found two places that could provide the physicals necessary for the firefighters. They have decided to have North Memorial do the physicals at a cost of $230 per physical, which includes five different areas that will be evaluated. There is enough funds in the budget for 22 people to have physicals this year. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, that we authorize the Fire Department to use North Memorial Medical Center, their North Fitness Plus Program, for physicals for the firefighters at a cost not to exceed $230 each to be spread over 1985 and 1986. Motion carried unanimously. Regular City Council Meeting October 15, 1985 - Minutes Page 7 (AVFD - Physicals, Continued) Chief Bob Palmer felt probationary members would be put through just a basic physical, and this one once they become active members. Council agreed, noting that would be an internal policy. AVFD - PURCHASE VIDEO EQUIPMENT Firefighter Terry Lindquist reviewed the September 15, 1985, memo regarding the three bids for the purchase of video equipment. He recommended the Blumberg Communications bid of $1,434 for a JVD camera, recorder, and tuner. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, that we authorize the purchase of JVC camera, recorder, and tuner and associated equipment as presented by the Fire Department through Blumberg Communications for the dollar amount of $1,434. Motion carried unanimously. AVFD - ISO RATING/FUTURE FIRE STATIONS Council then noted the letter from ISO regarding the lowering of the insurance rating for commercial businesses within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant to a Class 6. Council stated that is good news and congratulated the Fire Department for their efforts. Councilman Orttel stated that in many instances an insurance company will then rate the entire City on a Class 6, which could mean a lowering of insurance premiums for many residents. Firefighter Bob Dillon then addressed the Council regarding the success of the Department and its plans for the additional fire stations to provide better service to the residents. He didn't know just what dollar amount they were talking about as far as a bond issue yet. He stated it would not be'as much as was asked for in Maple Grove, $1.5 million; but he felt it would be more than $300,000 or $400,000. He said another issue that needs consideration is a water supply in the rural area for the northwest station and for the northeastern portion of the City. He stated they do not yet have cost figures for a new station and substation, but he will be looking to other departments as to what they have and their costs. He will be keeping the Counci I informed of their progress. AVFD - OATH FOR MEMBERS MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elli:ng, that we authorize the use of the Oath of Office as presented by the Fire Chief for Fire Department members. Motion carried unanimously. CHANGE ORDER NO. 1/IP85-9/WELL MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Elling, that we adopt the Change Order as presented, Change Order No. 85-9, reducing the contract by $80. Motion carried unanimously. SPECIAL MEETING/CANVASS SPECIAL ELECTION RESULTS MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, that we set October 30 at 7:30 p.m., for canvassi'ng the results of the special election. Motion carried unanimously. AWARD BIDS IP85-16/WATER & SEWER/SIPE & LAWRENCE Mr. Schrantz stated the bids came in high, asking the item be tabled until he can work on this item further. Counc il agreed. Regular City Council Meeting October 15, 1985 - Minutes Page 8 181ST AVENUE/SECTION 1 DISCUSSION Mr. Schrantz explained this road and several others in the City are not in very good condition, serve only one or two houses, and take a considerable amount of maintenance on the part of the City. He felt a policy should be made as to what to do with these roads. The residents off 181st Avenue would like to have gravel laid on the road. But there is no one to assess on projects such as this. It was noted the City has the ability to designate such raods as minimum maintenance roads and do only a minimal amount of maintenance on them. Council agreed to refer this item to the Road Improvement Committee to recommend a policy for maintaining these types of roads. NUISANCE ORDINANCE Council discussion was that such an ordinance may be worthwhile in handling nuisances and ordinance violations. MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Knight, that we adopt the ordinance providing for an abatement procedure for nuisances known as the Nuisance Ordinance. Motion carried unanimously. PERSONNEL MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, that we have the advertisement submitted to publications as follows: The Minneapolis Star, the City's Official newspaper, and the League Magazine for the position of Clerk/Treasurer. DISCUSSION: The ad would run for one week in the Star and the Anoka paper, and one month in the League magazine. Though the salary range isn't indicated in the ad, it was agreed the range would be about $20,000 to $24,000. Motion carried unanimously. Council also agreed the job description given to prospective applications would be that which was agreed to at the October 8 meeting. It was felt this could also be discussed at the special meeting on October 22 if necessary. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, that we rescind the two-hour maximum on time for the part-time City Clerk and allow that the Clerk work on whatever schedule necessary up to 30 hours a week. Motion carried unanimously. It was noted there is a vacancy on the Planning and Zoning Commission and a possible one the beginning of the year. Council directed the Clerk to run advertisements for the positions. It was also noted that with the resignation of Pat Lindquist, there is a vacancy on the Cable Commission. Council agreed if Ms. Lindquist wishes to remain on that Commission, it would be agreeable to the Council. If not, either an elected official or staff member should be appointed to fill that vacancy. Council discussed the request from David Almgren, Building Official, for requirements on building permits regarding surveying, elevations, grade, staking, etc. It was generally felt if those items would be required, it would add a lot of costs to the construction of a house, feeling it would not be necessary most of the time. Also, much of that work is done when the plat is done. It was thought this would not be proper to add this expense to all construction in the City when there has been trouble in only a few instances to date. It was agreed that the Building Official should have the authority to request further surveying, staking, etc., when he feels it is necessary but that it should not be required as a matter of course. - Regular City Council Meeting October 15, 1985 - Minutes Page g (Personnel, Continued) Council acknowledged the increased work load of the Building Official because of the increased construction in the City. They suggested he submit a proposal or recommendation to hire some part-time help. PARK AND RECREATION Mayor Windschitl understood residents were before the Park Board requesting funding for a warming house attendant again this winter, and the Park Board denied their request. After some discussion, the Council felt they didn't want to cut the funding for this program, that it is a worthwhile expense, especially since not many funds will be spent in this area from the bond issue. LOWER RUM RIVER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION Mayor Windschitl recommended Bruce Perry be appointed as an alternate to the Lower Rum River Management Organization. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Elling, to so move, that Bruce Perry be appointed as an alternate to the Rum River Water Management Organization. Motion carried unanimously. The Regular Meeting was then closed to discuss the litigation brought against the City by Rosella Sonsteby with the City Attorney, John Burke. 11:30 p.m. Reconvened at 12:10 a.m. APPROVAL.OF CLAIMS MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, that we approve Claims 10119 through 10208, with the exception of Check 10202 for the amount of $10, for the total amount of $118,124.32. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Lachinski, to adjourn. Motton carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 12:13 a.m. Respectfully submitted, \ì",,\:,"~ cc<~·:?~ L-- Marce~la A. Peach Recording Secretary -"