HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC September 4, 1984
-
~ 01 ANDOVER
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 4, 1984
AGENDA
1- Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
2. Resident Forum
3. Agenda Approval
4. Discussion Items
a. Variance/D. Carson
b. Cunningham Addition - Sketch Plan
c.
d.
e.
5. Non-Discussion Items
a. Plans/Specifications, IP84-8/South Coon Creek Drive West
b. Final Payment, IP84-5/Hughes Addition
c. Set Hearing Date, IP84-6/South Coon Creek Drive West-Sewer/Water
d. Set Hearing Date, IP84-7/Kadlec Addition
e. Easment to North Central/Outlot A-Northglen 2nd
f. Accept Easements, IP84-6
g. Mobile Home Permit Extension/Hoglund
h.
i.
6. Reports of Commissions, Committees, Staff
a. Fire Department-Insurance
b.
7. Approval of Minutes
8. Approval of Claims
9. Adjournment
'~ ~ ~
~ 01 ANDOVER
M E MaR AND U M
TO: IL
/
I
COPIES TO: ATTORNEY
FROM: CITY CLERK
DA TE: AUGUST 31,
REFERENCE: AGENDA COMMENTS - SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 MEETING
Item No. 3 - Aqenda Approval
Please delete Item No. 4b-Cunningham Addition Sketch Plan.
Item No. 4a - Variance/D. Carson
This item is continued from the August 21 Meeting, to allow the
Carsons time to explore other alternatives to provide the
required access to their property. This situation is similar
to the property owner off 167th Lane; they only owned a 60'
strip of land to the public roadway. They were not required
to blacktop the roadway before acceptance because it was a
continuation of a gravel street. I have requested a written
opinion from the City Attorney relative to a variance on the
width of a property. To-date I have not received that opinion.
Enclosed is a letter to the Carsons covering the discussion of
August 21.
Item No. 4b - Cunninqham Addition
The developer has completely redone the plat from the Sketch Plan
you formally approved on August 7; however, the Planning and
Zoning Commission handled it as a Preliminary Plat at their last
meeting. It was recommended for approval; therefore, you will
receive this for Preliminary Plat action on September 18.
Item No. Sa - Plans/Specifications, IP84-8 (SCCD-West/Streets)
Item No. Sb - Final Payment, IP84-S (Hughes Addition/Streets)
Item No. 5c - Set Hearing Date, IP84-6 (SCCD-West/Sewer,Water)
Item No. Sd - Set Hearinq Date, IP84-7 (Kadlec 2nd Addition)
Memorandums and Resolution enclosed.
Item No. Se - Easement to North Central
North Central Gas Company is requesting an easement for the
installation of gas lines across Outlot A in Northglen II.
They had received an easement from Good Value, however, we are
now the owners of the property and the previous easement was not
recorded.
Agenda Comments
September 4, 1984 Meeting
Page 2
Item No. Sf - Accept Easements, IP84-6 (SCCD-West)
A motion is needed to accept those easements not acquired as of the
August 21 Meeting.
Item No. 5q - Mobile Home Permit/Hoqlund
Mr. Hoglund is requesting a 90-day extension on his Temporary Mobile
Home Permit; with such extension to be to December 1 , 1984. The
property address is: 370 Andover Boulevard N.W.
Item No. 6a - Fire Department
1) A question has come up on the Life Insurance for members of the
Fire Department who are also full-time City employees. They
presently have a $10,000 policy for both positions. The motion
approving this insurance indicates "a $10,000 policy for all
employees will be paid by the City" and a separate motion reads
the same for the Fire Department. It has always been interpreted~
as the City will only pay for $10,000, even if the employee holds
positions in both places. What is the Council's intent?
2) Enclosed is a memorandum from Luverne Fire Equipment covering the
labor charges that were questioned by the City. Acceptance of
their proposal is requested.
Item No. 7 - Approval of Minutes
July 17, July 26, August 7, August 14, August 21
Enclosures
~ 01 ANDOVER
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 4, 1984
MINUTES
The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by
Mayor Jerry Windschitl on September 4, 1984, 7:30 p.m., at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Anoka, Minnesota.
Councilmen present: Elling, Knight, Lachinski, Orttel
Councilmen absent: None
Also present: City Attorney, William G. Hawkins; City Engineer, James
Schrantz; Building Inspector, Dave Almgren; City Clerk/
A. Administrator, P. K. Lindquist; and others
RESIDENT FORUM
Clarence Smith - asked if it would be possible to place the bounty back on pocket
gophers. He stated they are tearing up everything, and kids will not trap them
without a reason to do so. Council didn't know if the County paid a bounty unless
the city does too, and the Clerk was asked to check into that procedure. Council
stated that item could be looked into when the budget for 1985 is being reviewed.
AGENDA APPROVAL
The following changes were suggested: Delete Item 4b, Cunningham Addition - Sketch
Plan; Add Items 4c, City Park; 4d, Coon Creek Watershed; 4e, County Park on the Rum
River; 4f, Hazardous Waste Discussion; 5h, Budget Hearing Date; 5i, Ownership of
Utilities; and 5j, Water Connection Charges.
MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Knight, that we approve the Agenda as amended. Motion
carrled unanimously.
VARIANCE/D. CARSON
Dick Carson - stated he has talked to his attorney. Based on the information he provided,
the attorney feels the legal descriptions contained in the contract for deed conveys
the two nonexclusive easements to Doris and himself. He is having the abstract brought
up to date, after which his attorney will verify that opinion and put it in writing.
He thought he would be able to have that in several days. He asked that the item be
tabled for two more weeks to allow time to get that written opinion. Mayor Windschitl
agreed, noting the City Attorney will also have to verify ownership of the easement.
Attorney Hawkins stated he has prepared a written opinion on this item. The ord i nance
requires all lots in the City to have frontage on a public right of way, and the lot
width requirement must he measured within the first 30 feet of the frontage. Even
if Mr. Carson owns fee title from the lot to County Road g, the lot width does not meet
the requirement within the first 30 feet. He could see no way to grant a building
permit unless a variance was granted based on the standards in the ordinance. If the
lot pre-existed Ordinance 8, it could get by meeting 60 percent of the requirements,
but he wasn't sure the lot width would even meet that. He also emphasized that Mr.
Carson must own fee title to the easement in order for the Council to consider the
variance on lot width.
Mr. Carson - understood when leaving the last meeting that a variance for lot width
would be required. He also stated he talked with Marlys Chutich about the easement.
He didn't think they wanted to do any platting and did not discuss the property to the
east of his lot. The Clerk indicated she talked with Mr. Chutich who stated they no
longer own that property.
Mr. Carson stated he hoped to have his attorney's opinion for the next Council meeting.
If not, he will notify the Clerk as to when this item should be placed on the agenda
again.
Regular City Council Meeting
September 4, 1984 - Minutes
Page 2
(Variance/D. Carson, Continued)
Mayor Windschitl asked for a motion to table the item and allow the Clerk to reschedule
it. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Lachinski, to so move. Motion carried unanimously.
CITY PARK
Mayor Windschitl asked what progress has been made on the next phases of the City
Hall Park. He noted the Clerk's memo indicating there may be $g,OOO in the Park Board
budget to be placed toward this project. Mr. Schrantz informed the Council that quotes
will be opened on September 17 for Parts 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the park. TKDA has done the
drawings and made calculations of the earth work to be done. Council agreed to
determine which parts will be done once the quotes are known.
COON CREEK WATERSHED
Council briefly reviewed the discussion with the Coon Creek Watershed Board on August 29
relative to the ditch law, the public hearings on the repair of Ditch #57, the
assessment policy for that repair, and the regional ponding proposal. Council wanted
the record to show that they were not necessarily in favor of the repair because they
did not have enough information on which to make a decision. They also questioned why
money is being spent for the repair when Andover does not have a flooding problem.
Mayor Windschitl also reported there may be a move on the part of the Blaine City
Council to rescind some of their actions on this item. He thought there is also some
concern on the County level of what is taking place, as the County has to provide the
money for the repair until it is assessed.
Mayor Windschitl asked for a motion requesting a copy of the petition for the cleaning
of Ditch #57 from the Watershed Board.
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Elling, to so move. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Lachinski, that we direct the City Attorney to look into
the procedure of getting a project under the ditch laws of the State of Minnesota.
DISCUSSION: The attorney was asked to research how a project is initiated and can
there be a class action appeal against the assessments or must it be done on an
individual basis. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Orttel, that the Watershed Board provide us with a
deflnitive answer as to how the assessments will be determined on the various types of
property classifications. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Orttel, that we request a map from the Watershed showing
the current 100-year flood contours and also show what the 100-year flood contours would
be after the ditch improvement. Motion carried unanimously.
COUNTY PARK ON THE RUM RIVER
Councilman Knight explained how the cars line up on County Road 7 along the bridge,
showing where the access to the County park is and the canoe access to the Rum River.
Because the canoe access area is not patrolled, people do not leave their cars there,
but instead leave them on the road by the bridge. He stated it is creating a serious
problem on the road; it creates a traffic jam on the bridge, is dangerous, and private
property is being abused. He suggested asking the County to place the access to the
park closer to the bridge, which would alleviate the parking problem along the road.
He also suggested the County look at making the canoe access from within the park more
accessible so people would use it instead of the private property off the road by the
bridge.
Regular City Council Meeting
September 4, 1984 - Minutes
Page 3
(County Park on the Rum River, Continued)
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Orttel, that Pat (Lindquist) prepare a resolution asking
the County to consider putting a vehicle and boat access in the park reasonably adjacent
to the bridge on the east side of the bridge in the park area to alleviate congestion on
the road as well as violation of people's property. (See Resolution R084-84) Motion
carried unanimously.
HAZARDOUS WASTE DISCUSSION
Councilman Elling explained under the State Superfund Bill, Section 30, there is a
victims' compensation study, which is funded by $20,000 out of the general fund to
look at the health aspect of hazardous waste discharge and legal liabilities. A
Legislative Commission on Waste Management is doing this, and he has talked to the
people on the Commission about the well situation in Andover as it relates to the
extra costs involved because of the well advisory placed on that part of the City.
There is a draft that they will be having hearings on September 7 at the State Capitol,
and he has approached the committee to look at the water situation and compensating the
city or city residents for costs over and above what normal well would cost to replace.
Councilman Elling stated he would testify at that hearing.
Council felt a Resolution from the Council would be appropriate.
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, that the Council direct Pat Lindquist to prepare
a Resolution for the Legislative Commission on Waste Management stating the City's
position and supporting compensation for the costs of wells in excess of a standard
well due to the potential for pollution in the Andover well advisory area. (See
Resolution R085-84) Motion carried unanimously.
Council discussion also noted that some people in the City are drinking bottled water
because of the fear of contaminates in the water. Council agreed that the City should
have the information as to the most economical and reliable- alternatives fon treating
the well water if the residents are concerned about their drinking water. The Clerk
was directed to gather that information.
PLANS/SPECIFICATIONS, IP84-8/S0UTH COON CREEK DRIVE WEST
Mr. Schrantz reviewed the plans and specifications for the MSA road on South Coon
Creek Drive west. He stated the road is about the same as previously proposed in
front of the Christenson property. They went as far as they could to the south, unless
the Council is willing to reduce the setback for the property to the south of the
Christenson's.
Ray Freeman - stated he had no problem with the plans as proposed.
Discussion returned to the curve on the east end of the project as it relates to the
setbacks of the property owner~ on the end and the degree of the curve. Mr. Schrantz
felt that in the field they can make some minor adjustments to make the road fit. He
also stated they will have to do some warping in the street to match existing driveways.
MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Lachinski, that we approve the Plans and Specifications
for Project 84-8, South Coon Creek Drive West, and direct the City Engineer to move
the road as far to the south in front of the Christenson property as practical and can
be determined in the field. (See Resolution R086-84) Motion carried unanimously.
FINAL PAYMENT, IP84-5/HUGH'S ADDITION
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Orttel, a Resolution as presented accepting work and
d1recting final payment to Forest Lake Contracting for Project No. 84-5, Street
Improvement - 162nd Lane, HU$h'S Addition Area with the addition of the Chan~e Order
as presented, an additional 3,695.75, for a total payment of $59,996.61. (ee Resolution
R08ì-84) Motion carried unanimously.
Regular City Council Meeting
September 4, 1984 - Minutes
Page 4
SET HEARING DATE, IP84-6/S0UTH COON CREEK DRIVE WEST
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, that we set October 2, 1984, at 8 p.m., as the
date of the assessment hearing for South Coon Creek Drive, 84-6 Project.
Councilmen Knight and Orttel WITHDREW the Second and the Motion.
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, introducing a Resolution declaring cost,
d1recting preparation of assessment roll and accepting assessment roll and setting
date for assessment public hearing for the improvement of watermain and sanitary sewer
for Project 84-6 South Coon Creek Drive West in the amount of $172,300 for October 2,
8 o'clock at the City Hall. Motion carried unanimously. (This motion was brought back
for consideration later in the meeting.)
SET HEARING DATE/IP 84-7/KADLEC ADDITION
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, introducing a Resolution declaring cost,
directing preparation of assessment roll and accepting assessment roll and setting
date for assessment public hearing for the improvement of watermain, sanitary sewer,
streets, and storm drainage for Project 84-7, Kadlec Second Addition, for 7:30 p.m.,
October 2, 1984. (See Resolution R089-84) Motion carried unanimously.
SET HEARING DATE, IP84-6, CONTINUED
Council agreed the time for the hearing should be 7:30 p.m.
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, to bring back the Motion for the assessment
hear1ng on South Coon Creek Drive. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, to introduce the same Resolution at 7:30,
October 2. (See Resolution R088-84) Motion carried unanimously.
EASEMENT TO NORTH CENTRAL/OUTLOT A - NORTHGLEN SECOND
Mr. Schrantz explained when the gas line was installed, Good Value Homes owned the
property and North Central had an easement from them. North Central wants to record
the easement, but the City now owns the Outlot A. So North Central is requesting an
easement for the installation of gas lines across Outlot A in Northglen II. Council
questioned whether that line is on the private property of Lots 1-4 in the development
and directed Mr. Schrantz to make that determination.
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Lachinski, that the Council grant an easement to North
Central Public Service over Outlot A, Northglen Second Addition for gas pipeline
and that the North Central Public Service pay any cost incurred by the City in the
giving of the easement. Motion carried unanimously.
ACCEPT EASEMBNTS - IP84-6
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, that the City of Andover accept the easements
acqu1red to date for the South Coon Creek Drive Improvement Project. (See Resolution
R090-84) Motion carried unanimously.
MOBILE HOME PERMIT EXTENSION/HOGLUND
MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Orttel, that we extend the Mobile Home Permit for John
Hoglund at 370 Andover Boulevard for another gO days. Motion carried unanimously.
BUDGET HEARING DATE
Mayor Windschitl asked for a motion to set the budget meeting for 7:30, September 13.
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Lachinski, to so move. Motion carried unanimously.
Regular City Council Meeting
September 4, 1984 - Minutes
Page 5
OWNERSHIP OF UTILITIES
Mr. Schrantz asked the Council's opinion on a policy for the ownership of water, sewer,
and streets in the shopping center. He thought the City should own the watermain and
hydrant and have a blanket easement wherever they go. He had no problems with the
shopping center retaining ownership of the sewer lines and storm sewers on their
property. The City could inspect them and bill the shopping center, which is the way
Blaine does it with the Northtown Shopping Center. In Coon Rapids, the city owns all
the utilities to the last manhole and maintains them.
After discussion, the Council generally felt the City should not own any of the utilities
on the private property of the shopping center, but the City should have the right to
inspect the utilities and maintain or require maintenance as necessary. Mr. Schrantz
was directed to draft a policy for Council action at the next meeting that the utilities
would be owned privately but the City would have the right to enter, inspect, and use.
CONNECTION CHARGES
Mr. Schrantz stated the assessment rolls just adopted for Improvement Projects 84-6 and
84-7 also include the connection charges for water. He asked how that money would be
transferred to the water fund. If the money is transferred to the water fund right
away, additional monies would need to be bonded to cover that amount, estimating it
would be approximately $40,000. Or will it be added to the water fund as the assessments
come in, which defeats the purpose of putting the charge on the assessment roll.
Attorney Hawkins explained the total for the two projects is approximately $390,000,
and the proposal was to use $90,OOO remaining in the 80-3 construction fund and bond
for the balance through private placement. If the Council wants to bond for the
additional $40,000 for water connection charges, it would mean the bonding amount would
have to go out for public issue, which would cost $2,000 to $3,000 more. And to bond
separately for the two projects would also be costly as the bonding costs would double.
After some discussion, Attorney Hawkins stated there is additional monies in the 80-3
construction fund that could be put toward this project for the water fund so the bond
can stay under the statutory limit of $300,000 for private placement.
Council felt that most of the assessments in the Kadlec Addition will be paid off
relatively soon as it develops, so they advised the attorney to use an additional $20,000
from the 80-3 construction account toward these two projects and bond the $300,000
through private placement.
Mr. Freeman - asked if this method will increase the amount of the permit fee. Council
expla1ned the amount would be the same whether it was paid in cash with the permit or
is being assessed as in this case. It was also explained that a homeowner would not
be able to payoff just the connection charge when it is assessed, but he could pay
off the entire assessment at any time.
ANDOVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT
Mayor Windschitl reported Frank Stone has resigned as Fire Chief as of this morning.
Bob Palmer is the Acting Fire Chief.
Acting Chief Palmer - stated Mr. Stone also intends to ask for a gO-day leave of
absence from the Department, after which he will come back as a regular fire fighter.
Council discussed the August 27, 1984, letter from Todd Rust of Luvern Fire Equipment
offering the City of Andover credit in the amount of $540 to be used for future
purchases of fire department supplies and equipment. Council asked Acting Chief Palmer
to consider using that credit as soon as possible. Acting Chief Palmer stated he would
get back to the Council on this matter.
Regular City Council Meeting
September 4, 1984 - Minutès
Page 6
(Andover Volunteer Fire Department Report, Continued)
Council then discussed the question of life insurance coverage for members of the
Fire Department who are also full-time City employees. It was agreed a clarification
should be made to the administrative policy to say that such employees shall be
covered under both policies, as it is to the City's advantage to have employees as
firefighters and the premiums for the insurance are not that costly.
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, introducing a Motion clarifying the Personnel
Policy under benefits as it relates to employee life insurance, that if an employee
is also a firefighter or member of another City organization that is offered life
insurance, that that employee shall have the full amount offered by each organization.
Motion carried unanimously.
Acting Chief Palmer referred to the problem within the Department relative to OSAH's
requirement that no one with a beard be allowed on the Department. Council agreed to
give some thought to the item and discuss it at the next regular meeting.
Recess at 9:15; reconvene at 9:26 p.m.
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
MOTION by Elling, Seconded by Knight, that we approve Checks 8284 through 8323 for a
total of $27,410.47. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 9:42 p.m.
Marce a A. Peach
Recordi g Secretary