Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC November 15, 1983 ~ 01 ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 15, 1983 AGENDA 1- Call to Order - 7:30 P.M. 2. Resident Forum 3 . Agenda Approval 4. Discussion Items a. Special Use Permit - Gerhardt Denning b. Special Use Permit - T. Ryan c. Lot Split - Martensen & Kessler d. Rezoning - R. Sonsteby e. f. g. 5. Non- Discussion Items a. Contract/Appraisal - 138th Avenue Park b. Joint Powers Agreement/AnOka City-Water c. d. 6 . Reports of Commissions, Committees, Staff a. Park & Recreation - Community Schools b. 7. Approval of Minutes 8. Approval of Claims 9. Adjournment CITY 01 ANDOVER M E M 0 RAN 0 U M TO: CO PI ES TO: ATTORNEY -" FROM: DATE: REFERENCE: AGENDA COMMENTS - NOVEMBER 15 REGULAR MEETING Item No. 3 - Agenda Approval Item No. 4a - Special Use Permit-Gerhardt Denning Mr. Denning is requesting a SUP to allow him to construct a storage shed on his property (20 acres) on 167th Avenue off Verdin Street. The primary structure is not built on the property; and no time has been given for the construction of same. Planning and Zoning is recommending approval of the request. He intends to use the proposed structure for storage of his tractor and some garden tools. Attached is a resolution for approval with the contingency that the structure must be built in accordance with the plans submitted at the time of the SUP request; and with materials approved by the Building Inspector. These contingencies should assure that the building will look compatible, not be detrimental to neighboring properties now or in the future. Item No. 4b - Special Use Permit-To Ryan Mr. Ryan is requesting a SUP to allow him to construct and operate a kennel on his property in Hawk Ridge. The house is already constructed and the proposed kennel meets the provisions of ordinance 8u. Such requirements/provisions are included in the attached resolution for approval as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. You will note there was a public hearing and no neighbors were present to voice objection to such a facility. Item No. 4c - Lot Split-Martensen & Kessler, Inc. Attached is the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation for approval of the request to subdivide a 140x200 parcel on Poppy Street, zoned R-4 into two separate parcels. All provisions of Ordinance No.40 are met. Attached is a resolution granting approval; please note I am showing a $200 park dedication fee. No park fee has been paid at any time on this parcel, therefore, I would assume the fee would be due on both parcels. Regular City Council bceting November 15, 1983 Page 2 Item No. 4d - Rezoning/R. Sonsteby This item was tabled from the October 18 Meeting to allow the City Engineer time to check with Anoka County on the location of the proposed Bunker Lake Boulevard extension. Attached is a letter from the Engineer, along with a map showing the location of such extension. As you can see, this proposed alignment does directly affect the property of Mrs. Sonsteby's on 7th Avenue on which the rezoning is being requested. Also attached is a letter from Anoka City expressing their concerns for this potential rezoning. As you can see, they have the same questions as those presented by members of our Council. A resolution was prepared for the last meeting, however, if the Council does not approve the request, this resolution would be void. Please refer to the letter from Attorney Hawkins, dated November 7th, for comments to be included in any resolution passed. Item No. 5a - Contract/Appraisal - 138th Avenue Park A motion is needed to authorize the mayor and clerk to execute an Appraisal Contract with Appraisal Engineering Bureau, Inc. to have them perform the required appraisals of the property being used for the 138th Avenue Park, at a cost not to exceed $200 per parcel. Anoka County uses this firm for the majority of their CDBG work; in checking with other private appraisal firms, the rates given by AEB, Inc. appear to be very reasonable. Item No. 5b - Joint Powers Agreement/Anoka City-Water Attached is a memorandum from the City Engineer recommending approval of the Agreement. A motion is needed to authorize the mayor and clerk to execute this Agreement. Item No. 6a - Community Schools/To Strukel Mr. Strukel will be here to introduce his replacement for the next year (he will be taking a one-year educational leave); and to cover the current programs. He is also requesting that the Council adopt the attached Proclamation Declaring November 16 as National Community Education Day. Item No. 7 - Approval of Minutes August 2, 15, 16, September 6, 13, 20 (Regular/Special) , 26, October 4, 18, November 1. Attachments ~ 01 ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 15, 1983 AGENDA 1- Call to Order - 7:30 P.M. 2. Resident Forum 3. Agenda Approval 4 . Discussion Items a. Special Use Permit - Gerhardt Denning b. Special Use Permit - T. Ryan c. Lot Split - Martensen & Kessler d. Rezoning - R. Sonsteby e. f. g. 5. Non- Discussion Items a. Contract/Appraisal - 138th Avenue Park b. Joint Powers Agreement/Anoka City-Water c. d. 6 . Reports of Commissions, Committees, Staff a. Park & Recreation - Community Schools b. 7. Approval of Minutes 8. Approval of Claims 9 . Adjournment CITY 01 ANDOVER M E M 0 RAN 0 U M TO: COPIES TO: ATTORNEY -. FROM: DA TE: REFERENCE: AGENDA COMMENTS - NOVEMBER 15 REGULAR MEETING Item No. 3 - Agenda Approval Item No. 4a - Special Use Permit-Gerhardt Denninq Mr. Denning is requesting a SUP to allow him to construct a storage shed on his property (20 acres) on 167th Avenue off Verdin Street. The primary structure is not built on the property; and no time has been given for the construction of same. Planning and Zoning is recommending approval of the request. He intends to use the proposed structure for storage of his tractor and some garden tools. Attached is a resolution for approval with the contingency that the structure must be built in accordance with the plans submitted at the time of the SUP request; and with materials approved by the Building Inspector. These contingencies should assure that the building will look compatible, not be detrimental to neighboring properties now or in the future. Item No. 4b - Special Use Permit-To Ryan Mr. Ryan is requesting a SUP to allow him to construct and operate a kennel on his property in Hawk Ridge. The house is already constructed and the proposed kennel meets the provisions of ordinance aU. Such requirements/provisions are included in the attached resolution for approval as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. You will note there was a public hearing and no neighbors were present to voice objection to such a facility. Item No. 4c - Lot Split-Martensen & Kessler, Inc. Attached is the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation for approval of the request to subdivide a 140x200 parcel on Poppy Street. zoned R-4 into two separate parcels. All provisions of Ordinance No.40 are met. Attached is a resolution granting approval; please note I am showing a $200 park dedication fee. No park fee has been paid at any time on this parcel, therefore, I would assume the fee would be due on both parcels. - Regular City Council bceting November 15, 1983 Page 2 Item No. 4d - Rezoning/R. Sonsteby This item was tabled from the October 18 Meeting to allow the City Engineer time to check with Anoka County on the location of the proposed Bunker Lake Boulevard extension. Attached is a letter from the Engineer, along with a map showing the location of such extension. As you can see, this proposed alignment does directly affect the property of Mrs. Sonsteby's on 7th Avenue on which the rezoning is being requested. Also attached is a letter from Anoka City expressing their concerns for this potential rezoning. As you can see, they have the same questions as those presented by members of our Council. A resolution was prepared for the last meeting, however, if the Council does not approve the request, this resolution would be void. Please refer to the letter from Attorney Hawkins, dated November 7th, for comments to be included in any resolution passed. Item No. Sa - Contract/Appraisal - 138th Avenue Park A motion is needed to authorize the mayor and clerk to execute an Appraisal Contract with Appraisal Engineering Bureau, Inc. to have them perform the required appraisals of the property being used for the 138th Avenue Park, at a cost not to exceed $200 per parcel. Anoka County uses this firm for the majority of their CDBG work; in checking with other private appraisal firms, the rates given by AEB, Inc. appear to be very reasonable. Item No. 5b - Joint Powers Agreement/Anoka City-Water Attached is a memorandum from the City Engineer recommending approval of the Agreement. A motion is needed to authorize the mayor and clerk to execute this Agreement. Item No. 6a - Community Schools/To Strukel Mr. Strukel will be here to introduce his replacement for the next year (he will be taking a one-year educational leave); and to cover the current programs. He is also requesting that the Council adopt the attached Proclamation Declaring November 16 as National Community Education Day. Item No. 7 - Approval of Minutes August 2, 15, 16, September 6, 13, 20 (Regular/Special) , 26, October 4, 18, November 1 . Attachments ~ 01 ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 15, 1983 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Jerry Windschitl on November 15, 1983, 7:30 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Anoka, Minnesota. Councilmen present: Elling, Knight, Lachinski, Orttel Councilmen absent: None A lso present: City Attorney, William G. Hawkins; Planning and Zoning Commissioner, Maynard Apel; City Clerk/A. Administrator, P. K. Lindquist; and others RESIDENT FORUM Rosella Sonsteby, 4151 141st Avenue NW - wants to appeal the decision of the Council at the last meet1ng to allow only $100 toward the survey between her two lots. She felt she would not have had to resurvey if the lot stake had not been removed. Council agreed to consider the item for addition to the Agenda. Carroll Abbott, 2917 142nd Lane - thought they received their notices a day after the meeting about the water study for the City. Councilman Elling stated the only notice they received did not come from the City, but he personally passed the notice out in Northwoods and Green Acres the night before the meeting. Mayor Windschitl also noted there will be another hearing as an update, probably in March. Mr. Abbott - has been receiving calls from residents concerning the petition on the stop slgns, wanting to know what has been happening. He has informed them it is still being discussed but if they have a problem, they should call City Hall. His concern was at the time the signs were put up, it didn't ta.J<e signatures to do so. Now they have 90 signatures, and it seems to take a considerable amount of time to get them taken down. He asked if there was a meeting since the last one he was at. Mayor Windschitl stated it was discussed at a Council meeting and it will be discussed again at a Road Committee meeting, probably early next month. AGENDA APPROVAL MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, that we approve the Agenda as published with the add1tion of 4e, Appeal of the Lot Survey Decision for Rosella Sonsteby; Item 5c, Budget Hearing Date, and 6b, PCA-EPA Meeting. Motion carried unanimously. SPECIAL USE PERMIT - GERHARDT DENNING Commissioner Apel reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation to grant a special use permit allowing Mr. and Mrs. Denning to construct a storage shed on their property prior to the principal building. The Dennings have their house up for sale and do intend to build on this property on 167th Avenue off Verdin Street as soon as their house is sold. Mrs. Gerhardt Denning, 2526 North FerrA Stree~~o~ - stated they took the buildings that are up on the lot now from their noka property and moved them to the site. Council agreed that the special use permit would not be necessary once the principal structure is constructed. . MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Lachinski, entering a Resolution approving a Special Use Permit for the construction of an accessory building prior to construction of the primary structure as requested by Gerhardt Denning as prepared before us tonight, except in the last paragraph add "until such time as the principal structure is constructed." and delete the fifth "WHEREAS". (See Resolution Rl16-83) Motion carried unanimously. Regular City Council Meeting November 15, 1983 - Minutes Page 2 SPECIAL USE PERMIT - T. RYAN Commissioner Apel reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve a special use permit allowing Mr. Ryan to construct and operate a kennel as a breeding facility on his property in Hawk Ridge. At the P & Z meeting, Mr. Ryan indicated he had talked to his neighbors and there were no objections to what he wants to do. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Lachinski, that we approve a Resolution approving a Spec1al Use Permit for the purpose of having a dog kennel as requested by Thomas Ryan at 2730 177th Lane Northwest as presented with the addition of the last "BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED", add "and such permit shall be subject to an annual review." (See Resolution Rl17-83) Motion carried unanimously. LOT SPLIT - MARTENSEN & KESSLER Commissioner Apel reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the lot split request of Martensen & Kessler. They had looked at a previous preliminary plat to the east of this property, and a road did not tie into 136th Avenue. They approved the lot split on the basis that 136th Avenu.e' would not be extended to the east. Jim Martensen, 13433 Round Lake Boulevard - was present. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, introducing a Resolution approving a lot split for Plat 65932, Parcel 7800, as requested by Martensen & Kessler, Inc., as prepared. (See Resolution Rl18-83) Motion carried unanimously. REZONING - R. SONSTEBY Rosella Sonsteby - stated the property she is now wanting to be zoned General Business was or1ginally zoned commercial in 1969, stating when it was put on the zoning map, it was a mi stake. She showed a copy of a legal notice descritiing the entire piece of property as commercial, not the zoning now shown as NB and M-2. She stated she came to the City many times asking it to be changed, but nothing was ever done about it. She claimed it has never been rezoned since then except for the piece that Glen Sonsteby had rezoned for his garage. Council discussion was that the last time the City did a rezoning of the urban area for the Comprehensive Plan, many areas were rezoned and the published map became the official zoning. Presently the City does not have a "commercial" zone, and the Council can only deal with the existing zones and the maps that were inherited from previous Councils. Attorney Hawkins advised the City did not have to notify individua:l property owners of the rezoning of the southern portion of the City because the total acres involved was over that which is required by Statute for individual notification. The map was published, and that constitutes the official rezoning. Ms. Sonsteby - disagreed, again stating there was an error on the map, feeling that the C1ty did not have the right to rezone property unless the property owner is asked to do it. Discussion was then on the letter from the County of Anoka and the proposed alignment for the future County 116 through the property in question. Mayor Windschitl noted the County Board did pass a motion that the road wi 11 be constructed. Counc i lman Lachinski asked if Ms. Sonsteby would be willing to set aside the easement for that road. Ms. Sonsteby - stated she is not wi lling to give the county the land f or the road, but she had no problem with selling that land for the road. She also stated she would have no problem with the southern line of the General Business area being requested to be: shown along the future County 116 easement. She asked for a· copy of the letter from the City of Anoka. Ms. Sonsteby stated· the City of Anoka was contacted when she first applied for the rezoning, but they did not respond. The City then asked again for input Regular City Council Meeting November 15, 1983 - Minutes Page 3 (Rezoning - R. Sonsteby, Continued) on the matter; and she felt they then felt they had an obligation to respond, feeling that was not right and that the letter should then have no bearing on the Council's dec i s i on . Ms. Sonsteby stated she felt her request should be approved, that it is a good place for general business, and again expressed frustration and disappointment that the zoning as shown on the maps is inaccurate according to her notices and has not been corrected in spite of her recpeated requests to have it corrected. Council felt that the letter was relevant and reviewed the October 20, 19S3, letter in which the City of Anoka raised four issues to support their objection to the re~oning request. Those objections basically were that no development plan has been filed, no development is eminent, and no utilities are available; that the up-zoning and substantial increase in acres changes the character to a community commercial center with apparently no basis for such a change; that no market study has been conducted; and that the up- zoning increases the value of the property and would increase the cost of easement acquisition to the taxpayers of the County for the future County 116. Councilman Orttel stated they have some valid points, although it is weighted toward protection of their own businesses, which is understandable, and cautioned about the overuse of those objections. None of the Council had received any unfavorable comments from Andover residents about the rezoning request. ~s. Sonsteby - stated she did talk to the neighbors living on 41st in Anoka ~boùt apartments, and they indicated they would rather see general business than large apartment 'buildings right next to them. Discussion with Ms. Sonsteby continued on the use of the property if it is zoned GB and what her plans are for the area. Ms. Sonsteby - stated the Council already has the control over what can be put in the area. She didn't know what is going in there, but she wants to get a large grocery store and other small shops that follow that type of business. If the land is zoned GB, she can then look for businesses and be able to market the land easier. Further Council discussion was they generally were not opposed to that type of retail business, but that can only be done within a Shopping Center or Neighborhood Business classification, not General Business. Right now the SC classification could not be constructed because utilities are not available, but a portion of it is already NB and would allow the things Ms. Sonsteby proposed this even ing. It was noted that a large grocery store would be allowed in GB with a special use permit, but a plan would need to be submitted. Ms. Sonsteby - stated she would plat the property according to how many acres a potential buyer would want for a business. Once the property is rezoned, she could contact people who want to come into that area. But until it is rezoned, it is a waste of time to look for buyers. After further discussion, the Council generally felt that the area north of the easement for the future County 116 would best serve Ms. Sonsteby's needs with an NB zoning and would also be less offensive to the residents and to the scrutiny of the Council. Ms. Sonsteby - stated she would be satisfied with ·the zoning north of the proposed road to be NB and the land south of that easement to be M-2, feeling that property was zoned commercial in the first place. She envisioned that area for retail shops and a grocery store, but noted the northeast corner next to the gas company would make a nice spot for a paint and body shop, and that would have to go under General Business. Councilman Orttel stated no one may have any real disagreement with that type of operation, but rezoning the entire area GB restricts her with what it can be used for. Ms. Sonsteby - again stated she would be satisfied with the NB zoning for the area, and when the road does go through, there may be more direction as to what she could do with the property. Regular City Council Meeting November 15, 1983 - Minutes Page 4 (Rezoning - R. Sonsteby, Continued) Council discussed the procedure that would be required to change Ms. Sonsteby's request, noting it would have to go back through the Planning Commission. Ms. Sonsteby stated she is not willing to pay the $150 fee again. The Clerk stated a fee would not be required if the request is made here and the Council refers the matter to the P & Z. Ms. Sonsteby - then formally asked to withdraw her request for the GB zoning and to change her request to Neighborhood Business for the property north of the north right- of-way line of the proposed County 116 as submitted by the County and before the Council this evening. The property south of that right-of-way line, including the property for the road, would retain the existing zoning. MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Orttel, to refer the Sonsteby rezoning to the Planning and Zoning Commission for reconsideration based on her request to have the property north of the proposed 116 to be rezoned to Neighborhood Business. DISCUSSION: Council asked Ms. Sonsteby to provide corrected sketches of the request, including the location of the future County 116, the acres to be rezoned, and the dimensions of the area. Motion carried unanimously. APPEAL OF THE LOT SURVEY DECISION FOR ROSELLA SONSTEBY Councilman Orttel reviewed the Council discussion and decision at the November 1 meeting to have the City pay $100 toward the cost of the resurvey, 'a portion of what was re- quested by Ms. Sonsteby, based on paying tor the replacement of the stake that was alleged to have been removed by the City during a project but not to pay for the certificate of survey. Councilman Lachinski explained he voted against the motion believing the property would have had to have been resurveyed anyway to obtain new certificates of survey. Ms. Sonsteby - stated that is not true. She had a certificate of survey from Winters when the property was originally surveyed. But she could not use that: one because Caine and O'Malley would not put the stakes in unless they started from the original point again. Plus she had additional expense because the land had to go through quite title action, and now she has to torrens that property. She stated the certificate of survey from Winters was for the entire plat, and it was accepted by all the banks, stating she has to torrens the property because of the problems that have resulted from the resurveying done by Caine and O'Malley. Mayor Windschitl stated a torrens is the result of a title defect, not as a result of two stakes having been removed. Ms. Sonsteby - stated she was not concerned with the certificate of survey, but that came with the resurveying done by Caine and O'Malley, and that cost was $400. When the resurvey was done from the original stake, there was an overlap'in the title, and that is the reason for the torrensing procedure. She also stated she could prove that the stakes were put in before the City's storm sewer project through the area. After a brief discussion on just what the City's laibility is eight years after the fact and the cost of a professional firm replacing the stake versus the City doing so, none of the Councilmem wished to change their position taken at the November 1 meeting, so that action stands. CONTRACT/APPRAISAL - 11@TH AVENUE PARK MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Elling, that we authorize the firm of AEB, Inc., to do appraisals on the park property at 138th Avenue for an amount not to exceed $200 per parce 1 . Motion carried unanimously. Regular City Council Meeting November 15, 1983 - Minutes Page 5 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT/ANOKA CITY - WATER MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, that the City of Andover enter into a joint powers agreement with the City of Anoka for the use of emergency on ly water from the City of Anoka hydrant as prepared and presented by the City Engineer. Motion carried unanimous ly. SET BUDGET HEARING DATE MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, that we hold a final budget hearing on December 8 at 7:30 at the City Hall. Motion carried unanimously. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, that we authorize up to $175 for the Planning and Zoning Commission members to attend the Land Use Planning Workshop on December 9, 1983. Motion carried unanimously. PCA - EPA REPORT Mayor Windschitl explained at the PCA-EPA hearing last Thursday, most of the information was a review of what had been reported before. However, they have removed out of their work plan the well pump test, which the City has been told in the past is the key item for a water feasibility study. The plan is to obtain similiar information without that test. The Mayor had asked why it was being dropped and was told it was a cost factor, though he wasn't really satisfied with that answer. And to his knowledge, the Health Department, which has placed the restrictions on well drilling in a portion of Andover, was not consulted about the EPA work plan. The Mayor expressed frustration.with what is taking place in this project, wondering if the results will satisfy Andover's requirements. The Mayor then asked for direction from the Council relative to hiring on a per-hour or fixed~fee basis the firm of Hickock and Associates as advisors for the City. They would represent Andover's interest when reviewing the work the EPA and PCA are doing on the landfill problem, as that work is now being done without City involvement to a significant degree. The Council generally expressed agreement that the City should be represented by someone with the expertise in this field to be sure Andover's interest is being served, feeling the total cost for an advisor should not be great. The intent is not to criticize anyone, but the EPA and PCA both have priorities and those may not necessarily be Andover's priorities. Mayor Windschitl then asked Lyle Bradley if he was comfortable with the information received at last Thursday's meeting. Mr. Bradle~ stated absolutely not. He concurred with the need to have an advisor represent the C1ty's interests. He stated he couldn't believe the connotations about the flow of water determined strictly by the level, and using just three wells to determine the flow of water just might backfire. He also suggested the possibility of using local volunteers with expertise in this area to review the work plans, etc. The Mayor asked to be contacted if Mr. Bradley found someone who would be willing to do that. It was agreed that the Mayor would contact the firm of Hickock and Associates for a proposal and costs to represent the City and bring it back to the next Council meeting. APPROVAL OF MINUTES August 2 and 15, 1983: Correct as written. Regular City Council Meeting November 15, 1983 - Minutes Page 6 (Approval of Minutes, Continued) August 16, 1983: Page 3, last paragraph, add to the end of the second sentence: "...as he understands it~ they· expected to get sanitary sewer this year; and the physical installing of sewer in that area would be done with relative ease as the sewer line is close by." September 6, 13, 20 Regular, 20 Special, October 4, 6, 18, and November 1, 1983: Correct as written. MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Orttel, to approve the Minutes of August 2, August 15, August 16, September 6, September 13, September 20 Regular, September 20 Special, and October 18 as amended. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Ortte1, that we approve the Minutes of November 1. VOTE ON MOTI ON: YES-Elling, Knight, Lachinski, Orttel; PRESENT-Windschitl Motion carried. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, that we approve the Minutes of October 4 and October 6 as written. VOTE ON MOT! ON: YES-Elling, Knight, Drttel, Windschitl; PRESENT-Lachinski Motion carried. PARK AND KECREATION - COMMUNITY SCHOOLS Mr. Strukel reported on the community school enrollments for the fall and summer. He noted the playground activities were very well attended until after the July 3 storm, after which attendance dropped drastically. He also stated the fall enrollments are well attended, and especially noted that typically between 3,000 and g,OOO people use the building each quarter for various activities, excluding adult and youth enrollments. Mr. Strukel reported that the Crooked Lake Community School Advisory Council is in the process of erecting a 20x30'warming house and storage facility in part paid for by Advisory Council funds and in part by donations by key Advisory Council members who will donate labor, etc. They hope to have it completed for this skating season. Mr. Strukel aso reported that he is leaving on an educational leave of absence effective December 2 and will hopefully return in a year. The Council thanked Mr. Struke 1 for the work he has done in the community. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS Mr. Schrantz explained he met with representatives of the firm of Bonestroo, Anderlik, and Associates about the problems in the Senior Citizens Center. Bonestroo indicated the problems will be repaired, noting the proposals to do so. Some Councilmen were concerned that a bandaide-type repair not be done. No action was taken on the matter. MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Knight, that we approve Claims 7189 through 7279 in the amount of $271.532.22. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Knight, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 9:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, \::: \. 't..t\...(..t\:_ Marc lla A. Peach Record 1 Secretary