Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC September 21, 1982 ~ o¿ ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING-SEPTEMBER 21, 1982 AGENDA 1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M. 2. Resident Forum 3 . Agenda Approval 4. Continued Hearing/Commercial Auto Parts Appeal 5. Discussion Items: a. Trees/Anoka Auto Wrecking b. Forest Lake Contracting-Mining Permit c. Wm. Rademacher-Amended Special Use Permit/Gas Pumps d. Review Special Use Permits 1) J&J Liquors 2)Bonneville Beauty Shop e. Special Road Projects f. Enterprise Fund Budget g. Capital Improvements Program h. Lakeside Estates - Extension/Final Plat i. Appointment to Waste Management Committee j. Award Contract/Community Center Park k. l. m. 6. Non-Discussion Items a. Probationary Increase-Clinton b. Resolution-Order Preparation of Roll (82-7) c. 7. Reports of Commissions, Committees, Staff 8. Approval of Minutes 9 . Approval of Claims 10. Adjournment -- - CITY 01 ANDOVER MEMORANDUM TO: MAVOR ANn rmJNrn. co PI ES TO: ATTORNEY. STAFF FROM: CITY CLERK/A. ADM. DA TE: SEPTEMBER 16. 1982 REFERENCE: AGENDA INFORMATION - SEPTEMBER 21, 1982 Item No. 3 - Agenda Approval Please delete Item No. Sh - Extension/Lakeside Estates. Item No. 4 - Continued Hearing/Commercial Auto Parts Appeal The property will be visually checked on September 20/21 for compliance with all the items as shown in the revocation notice. I will have a complete report ready for the meeting. Item No. Sa - Trees/Anoka Auto Wrecking The Junkyard License for Anoka Auto Wrecking was approved in January for the 1982 Year; and included a comment that all yards would be inspected on May 1, 1982 for establish compliance with the ordinance. You did inspect the yards, however, no action or comments were made on Anoka Auto Wrecking because of the Special Use Permit for the Used Car Sales Lot impacting some of the provisions of Ordinance No. 44 covered by the Council on May 1. At the September 7 Meeting, the Council approved the Sales Lot and noted that it would not be reasonable to require the tree planting in front of the display area. The Building Inspector and Engineer are agreeable to allowing the display area to be covered with the asphalt strips in lieu of blacktop. It is my understanding that the actual customer parking lot will be hard surfaced, i.e. , blacktop. Item No. Sb - Mining Permit/Forest Lake Contracting Attached is a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission for approval of the Permit. The request has been reviewed by the Engineer for compliance; his comments are attached. Forest Lake Contracting is the firm awarded the MSA Contract. Item No. Sc - Wm. Rademacher Special Use Permit/Gas Pumps A request for an amended Special Use Permit is being made to allow the installation of additional pumps at the Shopping Center (Bill's Superette) . The original permit was approved in October, 1980, and allowed for three pumps; the new request is for an additional three, plus the underground storage tank. Distances from lot lines are sufficiently met. Approval is recommended. - Agenda Information September 21 , 1982 Page 2 Item No. Sd - Review Special Use Permits J&J Liquors We have received no complaints on the operation; it is recommended that the SUP be renewed. Bonneville Beauty Shop No complaints have been received on the operation or traffic; renewal is recommended. Item NO. Se - Special Road Projects Attached is a memorandum from the City Engineer covering various projects recommended to be done in 1982. Estimated costs are shown. Item No. Sf - Enterprise Fund Budget The Bond Resolution has been reviewed; it does not have any language to the effect that the "connection charges" must be placed into the fund as received. I have contacted some other cities with new water funds and have found that none of them are self-supporting the first two or three years. Money is loaned, usually from the General Fund, to pay the operating costs until such time as the Water Fund becomes revenue producing. I would not feel comfortable in "projecting" a time when the fund will become self-supporting, inasmuch, as building has been so erratic with interest rates such as they are. The original projections were that the Good Value area would be completely filled in two years. (the two years have gone and it is not even half filled at this time) . As was pointed out in my last memo, repayment of a flat fee of $12,000 per year would satisfy the debt as needed and would give us a base on which to control rates for service. Item No. Sg - Capital Improvements Program This is continued from several previous meetings. Item No. Sh - Extension/Lakeside Estates Delete Item No. Si - Appointment to Waste Management Committee Metropolitan Council is requesting members from the various communities to serve-on a Waste Management Board. The Council should appoint someone as soon as possible as they are already starting to meet. Item No. Sj- Community Center Park Plan Bids have been opened for the work on the two ballfields. Attached is a memoradum from Jim Schrantz. He will be meeting with the Park Board this evening, so he will have their comments. Item No. 6a - Probationary Increase/Clinton Please see attached memorandum covering the recommendation on Mrs. Clinton. Agenda Information september 21, 1982 Page 3 Item No. 6b - Preparation of Assessment Roll (Project 82-7) Inasmuch as a Bond Sale will not be required for the costs of this project, it will be necessary to adopt a resolution ordering preparation of the assessment roll. The actual Assessment Hearing must be set on October 5 for a date prior to October 29, thereby giving use the time required to send out notices, etc. pursuant to Chapter 429. Item No. 8 - Approval of Minutes June 10, June 15, July 6, July 14, July 20, July 28, August 3, August 17, September 7. ~ o¿ ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 21, 1982 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Jerry Windschitl on September 21, 1982, 7:30 p.m., at the Andover'City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Anoka, Minnesota. Councilmen present: Jacobson, Lachinski, Orttel, Peach (absent from 7:45 to 8:18 p.m.) Councilmen absent: None Also present: City Engineer, James Schrantz; City Clerk, P. K. Lindquist; and others AGENDA APPROVAL MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Jacobson, that we approve the Agenda as published wlth the following changes: the deletion of Item Sh, Lakeside Estates - Extension/ Final Plat; and the addition under Item 7, Mayor's Report. VOTE ON MOT! ON: YES-Jacobosn, Lachinski, Orttel, Peach; PRESENT-Windschitl Motion carried. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Jacobson, to suspend the rules. Motion carried unanimous ly. CONTINUED HEARING/COMMERCIAL AUTO PARTS APPEAL Attorney Irving Shaw, representing Charles Mistelski -'presented the Council with pictures showlng all the work that has been completed. The only thing not done is the placement of the slats in the gate, which will take about an hour and will be done tomorrow. MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Orttel, to repeal the revocation of the junkyard license for Commercial Auto Parts acknowledging that the irregular height of fence along the front has been corrected, that the junk and repairable vehicles stored outside the fence have been corrected, and that the trees not planted in accordance with Ordinance 44F have now been planted. Motion carried unanimously. TREES/ANOKA AUTO WRECKING Mrs. Calvin Jellison - explained the agreement reached with the Building Official to place Class 5 this fall and blacktop next spring the areas for the Bunker Lake Auto Sales. There are no plans at this time for the parking lot used for the junkyard business. It was noted the discussion this evening pertains only to the junkyard license. The issues brought out were the planting of trees along the front portion of the junkyard, the surfacing of the parking lot, and the extension of the fence on the east side so junk cannot be seen from the new Hanson Boulevard Extension. Mrs. Jellison - stated fill is being put in on the east side, and the fence will be completed to the trees so junk will not be seen from Hanson Boulevard. She stated when discussing surfacing for the parking lot with the Building Official, it pertained just to the auto sales business, and nothing was mentioned about the auto wrecking parking lot. Mr. Schrantz stated asphalt strips for the parking lot surface would satisfy one of the ordinances on a temporary basis, but he didn't agree that it was a permanent solution. Council agreed trees would not need to be planted in front of the fence in the portion that would be the auto sales business. But when viewing pictures of the yard, it was suggested the portion between the auto sales and the east fence have trees placed where appropriate and reasonable to comply with the ordinance. (Councilman Peach responded to a fire call at this time, 7:45 p.m.) - Regular City Council Meeting September 21, 1982 - Minutes Page 2 (Trees/Anoka Auto Wrecking, Continued) It was suggested the City Clerk, Engineer, or Building Official meet with the Jellisons to review the ordinance requirements, look at where the trees might be planted and at the surfacing of the parking lot. MDTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, that we move the question of Anoka Auto Wrecklng junkyard license to the next regularly scheduled meeting in order to allow time for the owners of the facility to meet with the Building Inspector to determine if additional trees need to be planted, and the Building Inspector to report back to the Council, and for the owners of the property to provide the adequate asphalt stripping for the parking lot for the junkyard portion. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, l-Absent (Peach) vote. RESIDENT FORUM Jeff Johnson - stated he owns Parcel 4860 on Prairie Road. He stated he did not get notice of the road improvement project proposed for Prairie Road. He went over there last Saturday and found nine of his oak trees gone. According to the City records, all the other landowners were notified. He felt he should have the right to take the trees in front of his property. If he would have known, he would have cut the trees down himse If. Council discussion was that it was the City's intention to allow the adjacent property owners to cut down the trees and that it was an oversight on the City's part to notify him. The Engineer was directed to determine if there are trees in some of the other projects being done that the property owners do not want which could be traded with Mr. Johnson. FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING - MINING PERMIT Jim Elling, P & Z Commissioner, reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval of the mining permit request. Clarence Wirkus, 13435 Jay Street, owner of the property, was present. Mayor Windschitl asked if this parcel was involved with any of the hazardous waste sites in that area. Both Ms. Lindquist and Mr. Elling stated they were not aware of any dumping on this property. Mr. Elling stated he walked the property and did not see anything out of the ordinary. Councilman Jacobson wondered if the company should be required to post a bond to be sure the final grading, sloping, seeding, etc., is completed. Others questioned whether a bond could be required by the City because it is on private property and is not a City project. Mr. Elling also stated that they are asking the hauling be done via Hanson Boulevard, which requires a County permit to haul on the County road. The P & Z discussion was if hauling of this type is done on City streets, bonds should be required in the event of damage to the City streets as a result of the hauling. Mr. Schrantz explained a hill will be cut down. They will be required to keep the land on the north end equal to or higher than Hanson Boulevard and to leave enough for ponding to handle the drainage from the property in a 100-year storm. The 1 and is being lowered, but it is being left high enough to possibly construct a road between Hanson and Jay Street. He explained the proposed elevations, stating it is difficult to know what finished level should be required because it is not known how that land will be developed in the future. He explained the highest elevation would be 895 by Hanson Boulevard, sloped to the lowest elevation of 893. Council noted those figures should be shown on the map. Discussion noted the power companies control the easements under the power line. Approval has been granted by NSP; however, UPA has not yet been contacted because the owner was not aware of that easement. Regular City Council Meeting September 21, 1982 - Minutes Page 3 (Forest Lake Contracting - Mining Permit, Continued) MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Lachinski, introducing a Resolution approving a Special Use Permit for the purpose of mining as requested by Forest Lake Contracting, Inc., as prepared; and an additional condition, note that the plat showing the finished elevations as amended by the City Engineer on 9-21 be attached to the Special Use Permit and be made a condition of the Special Use Permit; and Item 8 note any additional easements; and subject to a one-year review (See Resolution R82-82) Motion carried on a 4-Yes, l-Absent (Peach) vote. WILLIAM RADEMACHER - AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT/GAS PUMPS MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, a Resolution approving an Amended Special Use Permit for additional gasoline pumps and storage at Bill's Superette at 14041 Round Lake Boulevard as presented on Agenda Item Sc, on meeting 9-21-82. (See Resolution R83-82) Motion carried on a 4-Yes, l-Absent (Peach) vote. REVIEW SPECIAL USE PERMIT - J & J LIQUORS Bruce Perry, 17337 Roanoke - stated the business has a sign on the opposite corner from their place WhlCh is on a residential lot and is in violation of the ordinance. The Clerk stated the owners of J & J's have been notified in writing that the sign is in violation of the ordinance and must be removed. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, that we move the matter of the Special Use Permit for J & J Liquors to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council, and have the City Clerk relay to the owners of J & J Liquors the illegal sign advertis- ing the establishment on property owned by one of the owners of the liquor store, and relay at the same time the contention of the City Attorney and ask them to appear at the next meeting of the Council for resolution of the matter. DISCUSSION: The Special Use Permit is good only until the First of October, and it was felt approving the permit contingent upon removal of the sign would be the best procedure. Councilmen Lachinski and Jacobson WITHDREW the Second and the Motion. MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Orttel, approving the Special Use Permit for J & J Liquor through October 1, 1983, contingent upon the removal of an illegal sign on residential property in the vacinity of the J & J Liquor store. VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Lachinski, Orttel, Windschitl; ABSTAIN-Jacobson; ABSENT-Peach Motion carried. (Councilman Peach returned at this time, 8:18 p.m.) REVIEW SPECIAL USE PERMIT - BONNEVILLE BEAUTY SHOP A gentleman representing the beauty shop reported there has been no proble~s or complaints with the shop from any of the surrounding neighbors. MDTION by Orttel, Seconded by Lachinski, that the Council renew a Special Use Permit for the Bonneville Beauty Shop for a period of 12 months. Motion carried unanimously. SPECIAL ROAD PROJECTS Council reviewed the September 17, 1982, memo from the City Engineer on the special road projects suggested and to find funds for the surfacing of the parking lot around the Public Services Building. After discussion, the Council generally agreed to all the special road projects with the exception of the shoulder work in the LakeRidge Addition. Mr. Schrantz stated there are several options to repairing the shoulders. The Engineer was directed to review the past events relative to the LakeRidge Addition to determine if there is some liability on the part of the developer and/or the engineer or engineering firm Regular City Council Meeting September 21, 1982 - Minutes Page 4 (Special Road Projects, Continued) who recommended acceptance of the roads. Also, find out when the gas company worked in the area, as the developer is claiming that is when the shoulders were tore up. In addition, look into the possibility of assessing for the shoulder repair work. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Peach, that we authorize the City Engineer to complete the projects as proposed in his letter of 9-17-82 with the exception of the LakeRidge shouldering for an estimated total dollar amount of $9,700. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Peach, that we authorize up to $3,000 for the construction of the parking area at the Public Works Building, funds to be transferred from the Special Projects,$2,OOO, and Sealcoating Fund, $1,000; and $4,000 from the Fire Department budget for the construction of the paved parking area for the Fire Department. Motion carried unanimously. AWARD CONTRACT/COMMUNITY CENTER PARK MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, that we award a contract to Burton Kraabel Construction in the amount of $14,659.15 for work on the City Hall park in Andover taking note of other bids from Central Landscaping, Park Construction, and Julian M. Johnson Construction Company, and also authorize the City Engineer and any other City official necessary to purchase materials for this project at an estimated price of an additional $16,615; and authorize the engineering costs for design and staking at approximately $4,600 for an estimated total cost of the first phase of the project of $35,874; such money to come from Park Board funds. DISCUSSION: Councilman Peach stated he has talked with Mr. Kraabel, who indicated he made a $6,000 error in his bid. Mr. Schrantz stated he has also talked with Mr. Kraabel, that there is nothing that can be done once the bidding process has started, and that Mr. Kraabel indicated he would do the project for the price bid. Mr. Schrantz felt that if Mr. Kraabel hauls in the material, dumps, and spreads it, there would not be a loss. Mr. Schrantz stated it is expected the project will be done this year. Discussion was also on whether the money should come from the park dedication fees fund or the general fund. General consensus was that it would come from funds that are not committed for other uses. The money in the general fund has been committed to the Kelsey Park purchase; therefore, the funds for this project would have to come from park dedication fees or other unencumbered Park Board funds. Motion carried unanimously. CABLE TV REQUEST The Clerk stated the contractors for the cable TV system have requested a conceptual agreement to the leasing of one-half acre on the City Hall site for their hub on which they would construct a building of approximately 30x40 feet and one 7S-foot tower. Council questioned how the building wouïd fit in with the City Hall site plan, feeling it would be better to locate it toward the western edge of the property so it would not interfere with the expansion of the City Hall building or other plans. APPOINTMENT TO WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Councilman Orttel volunteered to represent the City on the committee. MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Jacobson, to appoint Councilmember Ken Orttel to the Waste Management Committee. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, l-Abstain (Orttel) vote. PROBATIONARY INCREASE - CLINTON Discussion was on M~ Clinton's present salary and proposed increase. The Clerk explained when determining the 1983 budget, an eight percent increase was used on her Regular City Council Meeting September 21, 1982 - Minutes Page 5 (Probationary Increase - Clinton, Continued) total earnings, not/~Rat is made at the end of the year. Ms. Lindquist also explained that in the past, probationary increases have generally been ten percent. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Peach, that the City Council take note that Shirley Clinton has completed her six-month probationary period and increase her salary from the present $6.25 an hour to level $6.75 per hour effective October 1, 1982. Motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION/ORDER PREPARATION OF ROLL/82-7 MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Orttel, a Resolution establishing costs and ordering preparation of the assessment roll for Project 82-7, Street Improvement in the Russell/Stack Addition, l6Sth Avenue NW lying west of Seventh Avenue as presented with the note that in the Resolution the appropriate contract costs will be entered by the City Engineer. (See Resolution R84-82) Motion carried unanimously. Council questioned whether there will be assessment hearings on the State Aid Projects for right-of-way costs, in particular the portion that is commercial and industrial for Hanson Boulevard. The Clerk was asked to review this further. FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT Assistant Chief Bill Bush requested approval to purchase a projector for the training department, estimating a cost of $579, funds to come from their training and public education budget, 412.34 and 412.401. Councilman Jacobson felt the cost was too high and that a similiar unit should be able to be purchased for approximately $350. He will call the city with information on this item tomorrow. MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Orttel, that the Fire Department be authorized to purchase a projector as specified for a cost not to exceed $400, with funds to come from 412.34 and 412.401 in the budget. Motion carried unanimously. Recess at 9:04; reconvene at 9:20. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Windschitl expressed concern with the performance of the engineering firm of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik, and Associates, especially with the progress of the construction of the Senior Citizen Center and the Municipal State Aid projects. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Peach, that we authorize the Mayor; City Clerk, and ëìtÿïrngineer to meet with representatives from Bonestroo Engineering to discuss matters of the Senior Citizen Center and other projects being undertaken by the engineering firm within the City. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Windschitl also explained the problem with the City's police protection since the City of East Bethel shifted their eight-hour police shift from evening to daytime hours. What has happened is that the Ham Lake and Andover cars are having to cover problems in East Bethel during evening hours, which means at times Andover's police car must leave the City. He cited an incident when Andover's car was out of the City for over 2~ hours one evening because of a disturbance in East Bethel. It is in effect paying for coverage the City is not receiving. The Mayor stated he has expressed these concerns to Buster Talbot, explaining that providing backup is understandable, but providing routine services for another city is intolerable. Mayor Windschitl stated if he cannot resolve this through the Sheriff's Department, he would like to meet with the Mayor of Ham Lake. This problem did not occur until East Bethe 1 made their shift change. Regular City Council Meeting September 21, 1982 - Minutes Page 6 (Mayor's Report, Continued) Mayor Windschitl suggested that since Ed Fields, County Commissioner, is no longer running for office, that the City present him with a plaque or certificate of appreciation for his years of services to the City and to the County. MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Lachinski, that the,City Clerk be authorized to purchase a plaque commemorating Commissioner Field's long years of service to the County and to the City, with presentation at the second regular meeting in the month of October. DISCUSSION: The Clerk was directed to research the legality of spending public money on an existing public official. Motion carried unanimously. Councilman Peach reported that Natalie Haas, County Commissioner Candidate for District 1, asked to address the Council. After a short discussion, it was generally felt that it would not be appropriate if done for political purposes. There was also some discussion on the possibility of setting up a "Meet the Candidates" night in Andover, but generally feeling that should be done by some other organization other than the City, though there was no objection to the use of the City Hall for such a purpose. ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGET Discussion was first on the water fund budget. Council felt that the budget must be balanced before it can be approved. Mayor Windschitl stated that after the discussions he would be in favor of covering the shortage from the connection charges. Council generally agreed to reduce the $12,000 figure from 4825.532 under administration to $7,556. Council also questioned the administration cost, feeling it is quite high, noting that the City must have five times as much usage to cover those expenses. It was questioned if that amount could even be collected when the entire area is totally deve loped. There was also discussion on the amount budgeted for personnel, with some feeling the amount is high compared to the size of the water system. A specific breakdown of manpower hours spent on the system was requested to see if the expenses are justified. It was also asked what percentage of manpower is for water systems of other communities. And it was questioned what specific daily tasks are required that would take that amount of time. It was suggested when the 1983 budget is being discussed that members of the Public Works Department be present to explain these items to the Council. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, that the City Council approve the 1982 Public Utilities Water Fund Budget with the deletion under 4825.532, sum showing $12,000, reduce that by $4,440, making appropriate other arithmatic calculations when removing that. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion was then on the Sewer Fund Budget, especially as it relates to the refund and credits the City has or will be receiving from the Metropolitan Wàste Water Commission. The Clerk noted the fund will require a user rate increase the beginning of 1983, but it will not be as much as originally anticipated because of the rate changes to the City by Metro Waste. It was noted that once the exact figures are known on the refund or credit the City will be receiving, the fund should be self- supporting. For the 1982 budget, it was suggested the shortage be made up from the General Fund. The Clerk was asko asked to provide an accounting of the sewer fund balances since 1976 noting any surpluses in these funds from prior years. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, that we approve the 1982 Public Utilities Budget for Sewer Fund A and Sewer Fund B as presented, noting a deficit in each fund and such deficit to be made up by surplus general funds to be decided by the Council and from any surplus sewer funds from preceeding years. DISCUSSION: Mr. Perry asked Regular City Council Meeting September 21, 1982 - Minutes Page 7 (Enterprise Fund Budget, Continued) if there is something in there protecting those in the rural area with on-site septic systems from having to subsidize the sewer funds. Council noted there is no reason why the sewer funds should have to be subsidized by the general funds, that with the rate reduction, refunds, or credits from the Metro Waste Commission, and with an increase in sewer user fees, the fund should be self-sufficient. The risk of the general fund subsidizing the water fund exists, but it should not exist for the sewer funds. The Clerk explained taking the fund balances since the beginning, there is no surplus since the beginning of 1981. She also explained that the budget shows a deficit; but in reality because of the time factor in paying the bills, no dollars will actually be taken from the general fund. She also noted that the purchase of a van previously suggested for Public Works has been removed from the Enterprise Budget. Mot i on carried unanimous ly. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Council discussed the proposed Capital Improvements Program noting that it is merely a guide to be used for the purchase of capital equipment and that it should also be updated on an annual basis. It was generally agreed to include the second alternative payment schedule of the three alternatives provided by the CIP Committee. MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Orttel, that the Capital Improvements Program be adopted as presented by the Capital Improvements Committee showing Alternative No.2 for the proposed financing as the maximum amount to be bonded. Motion carried unanimous ly. The Clerk was directed to look into costs of having the copy bound, including asking TKDA for a cost estimate, prior to submitting it to the Metropolitan Council. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Orttel, that we authorize the Mayor and Clerk to ลกìgn such documents as may be necessary to send the Capital Improvements budget to the Metropolitan Council for their approval. Motion carried unanimously. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Councilman Jacobson suggested asking the P & Z to look at the mining permit in the ordinances to see if they feel there should be some bond required for mining within the City. He has a problem if someone just walks away, leaving a hole, and not re- claiming it, etc. Chairman d'Arcy Bosell felt that could be looked at as the ordinances are being updated. Council cautioned the bond issue be looked at closely when it relates to mining being done for private purposes, questioning whether the City has the authority to require a bond in such instances. APPROVAL OF MINUTES -- J~ne 10, June 15, July 6, July 14, July 20, July 22, July 28, August 3, 1982 - Correct as written August 17, 1982: Page 5, Election Judges, first paragraph, second sentence, delete: "... including Chi ef Judges... " September 7, 1982: Correct the numbering sequence of Resolution Numbers. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Lachinski, that we adopt Minutes of June 10, June 15, July 6, July 14, July 28, August 3, and August 17, September 7 as amended. Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Windschitl voting in favor except for those portions of the Minutes that directly affect him on July 28. Regular City Council Meeting September 21, 1982 - Minutes Page 8 MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Peach, that we approve Minutes of July 20 and July 22 as presented. VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Lachinski, Ortte1, Peach, Windschitl; PRESENT-Jacobson Motion carried. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, to approve Checks 5657 through 5730 in the amount of $42,115.79. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Ortte1, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 11:04 p.m. Respectfully submitted, "\)~~ ~"~~ Marce a A. Peach Recording Secretary