Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC June 15, 1982 , , ~ o¿ ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING-JUNE 15, 1982 AGENDA 1 . Call to Order - 7:30 P.M. 2. Resident Forum 3. Agenda Approval 4. Discussion Items a. Blake Contracting-Special Use Permit b. Eckhardt - Variance c. Stroemer - Variance d. Hawk Ridge East - Final Plat Approval e. Award Contract - Senior Citizen Center f. Legal Action - LGA Apportionment g. Legal Action - Arden Hills Interceptor h. L. Reimann - Rezoning i. 5. Non-Discussion Items a. Grading Plan for City Hall Site b. c. 6. Reports of Commissions, Committees, Staff 7. Approval of Minutes 8. Approval of Claims 9. Adjournment ~. , '....' -- CITY 01 ANDOVER M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL COPIES TO: ATTORNEY - STAPF FROM: CITY CLERK/A. ADMINISTRATOR DATE: JUNE 10 , 1982 REFERENCE: AGENDA INFORMATION - JUNE 15, 1982 Item No. 3 - Agenda Approval Please add Item NO. 4h (Reimann Rezoning). Delete Item No. 4d (Hawk Ridge East Final Plat). Item No. 4a - Blake Contracting - Special Use Permit The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit for the purpose of mining from the West Half of Lot 13, Watt's Garden Acres. His intention is to remove in excess of 400 cu. yd. of soil, with the property ultimately being used as a parking lot Planning & Zoning has recommended approval of the request. A resolution will be prepared granting approval and setting out the haul route and requirements for final grading of the area. Item No. 4b - A. Echardt Variance Mr. Echardt is requesting a variance to allow him to convey a 21' strip of land from Parcel 1350, Plat 65930, to be attached to Parcel 1370, Plat 65930. Because of the configuration of the two properties, it is more reasonable for this strip to be on Parcel 1350 than on Parcel 1370. Parcel 1370 has access to 147th Avenue to the north, therefore, the 21' strip of land is not required. A resolution will be prepared, granting approval and requiring Mr. Eckhard to combine this strip of land with Parcel 1370. Item No. 4c - C. Stroemer Variance Mr. Stroemer is requesting a variance to allow him to construct an enclosed deck which will be within the required rear yard setback from a lake. Planning and Zoning Commission interpretted the ordinance to say he did not require a variance, therefore, did not formally approve or deny the request. This is not a detached structure, and as a result, the setback requirements under Ordinance 8, Section 4.06 and 4.33 must be met (or a variance granted) . A resolution will be prepared granting approval. Item No. 4d - Hawk Ridge East Final Plat The developer has requested that this item be handled at the July 6 Meeting to allow him time to have the streets inspected. The Final Plat has been filed, so time requirements have been met. Agenda Information June 1 5 , 1982 Page 2 Item No. 4e - Award Contract/Senior Citizen Center Bids were opened on Tuesday, June 8. As you can see from the attached Bid Tabulation Sheet, there was an extreme spread in the bids. The alternates, #1 through #M-l total $6,868.00, bring the total low bid to $115,448.00. Based on the information received from Anoka County, this amount will fit into our Grant allocation. I have spoken to some of the Park Board Members, and they do not have any problem with paying the amount due from the City for the warming house. You will recall that I reported to you that Anoka County was now of the opinion that they could not go along with the "exchange of space" originally proposed for the structure, i.e. , the existing 16'x60' portion of the City Hall would be given to the Seniors in exchange for an equal area in the new portion. As a result, an addendum was sent out to the bidders, to break out the cost for the two walls, doors, cement floor and roof of the warming house portion of the building. I will be meeting with B.R.A. on Monday, at which time they will have their recommendation. A resolution will be prepared awarding the Contract to the lowest responsible bidder, with the exception of the alternates which cannot be awarded until after July 1 (1982 Funds). Item No. 4f - Legal Action/LGA Apportionment There has been for some time, considerable disagreement in the manner in which the State of Minnesota allocates local government aid funding. There are numerous inequities that have been demonstrated within the present formula. The City of Ramsey has engaged an attorney and are proceeding w/legal action against the State of Minnesota . Enclosed is a resolution which would join the City of Andover in the suit. Representatives from the City of Ramsey will be here to discuss the matter with you. Item No. 4g - Legal Action/Arden Hills Sewer Interceptor En~losed is a letter from the City of Moundsview requesting support from other cities in Service Area #2. Jim Schrantz has reviewed the request and his comments and recommendations are attached. Item No. 4h - Reimann Rezoning Because of ordinance time requirements, this matter must be acted upon by the City Council at this meeting. Attached is the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation for denial of the request. A resolution will be prepared covering the P&Z recommendation. Item No. Sa - Grading Plan for City Hall Site Attached is a memo from Jim Schrantz, covering a proposal for the grading of the City Hall site. Item No. 6 - Reports of Commissions, Committees, Staff The Pee' , Reeeeetion Co..i,,10n will heve en ite~~e'e eppeovel. Item No. 7 - Approval of Minutes _ cd June 1, 1982 L__ ___ ~;-- ~ o¿ ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 15, 1982 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Jerry Windschitl on June 15, 1982, 7:30 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Anoka, Minnesota. Councilmen present: Jacobson, Lachinski, Orttel, Peach Councilmen absent: None Also present: City Attorney, William G. Hawkins; City Engineer, James Schrantz; Planning and Zoning Chairperson, d'Arcy Bosell; City Clerk, P. K. Lindquist; and others ANOKA COUNTY WASTE TIRE ORDINANCE State Representative John Weaver, County Commissioner Ed Fields, and Director of Environmental Services of Anoka County Bob Hutchinson were present. Representative Weaver stated largely through the efforts of Mr. Hutchinson, Anoka County has enacted the first piece of legislation on waste tire management in the metropolitan area. He felt this legislation needs to be enacted in order to be effective, although at this point Anoka County will be the only county regulating waste tire disposal until such time as neighboring counties would do the same. As other counties follow suit, the flow of waste tires will be directed to a licensed market which hopefully will make the tires marketable as an energy resource. Mr. Hutchinson provided drafts of the county's Waste Tire Ordinance and reviewed the main elements of it, including the definition; that waste tires shall be managed, stored, collected, transported, processed, and disposed of in accordance with the ordinance; that waste tires must first be processed to a maximum particle size of six square inches prior to land storage or disposal; and the keeping of records concerning waste tire management. Two other elements are the collection center arrangements and the processing service, or drop charges, for the waste tires and escrow placed with the county for processing of the tires. Mr. Hutchinson explained one of the major stumbling blocks to such regulation in the past has been there was no equipment available for the reprocessing of the waste tires. However, now the company of Schriptek has a machine that tears apart the tires; and he explained the process involved, noting its efficiency and speed. Schriptek has indicated an interest in establishing a processing and collection center under contract, and the county is now in the pnocess of writing up bids for such a process. Mr. Hutchinson went on to say another element of the ordinance which is not addressed is the present accumulation of waste tires and to provide a waste tire program to prevent further accumulation of these tires. In further discussion with the Council, Mr. Hutchinson reviewed the overall size of the tire after it has been shreaded. He also noted that it is expected the drop charge for waste tires would be approximately 50 to 60 cents per tire, which would be the cost of managing that tire excluding any revenues from the sale of it. Schriptek has inquired into the possibility of establishing a collection and processing facility on the Heidelberger property because of the backlog of tires on the property that could be used to fill their contractural needs. Mr. Hutchinson has told them they would have to talk with the City and meet any requirements the City may set forth, expecting the City would probably want to require screening, fire con- trol and fire lanes, processing schedule as to when it can be expected the tires will be processed, schedule for processing the backlog of tires, noise considerations, etc. It has been estimated that there is three years' worth of waste tires which could be processed on the Heidelberger property. Mr. Hutchinson did not know whether Schriptek Regular City Council Meeting June 15, 1982 - Minutes Page 2 (Anoka County Waste Tire Ordinance, Continued) has reached an agreement with Mr. Heidelberger, that they had talked about both purchasing and leasing the land including the right to the tires, but that the liability question for the hazardous waste on the property has not yet been resolved. There is only one other operation like this in the country, and that is the forerunner to this Schriptek machine. UPA is presently testing the use of processed tires mixed with coal as a source of fuel, but the results have not yet been completed. Commissioner Fields felt that because there is a health hazard on the Heidelberger property, the County and the City should make an effort to get rid of the waste tires. He also stated before the county would license any waste tire collection center in the City, they would come before the Council again to discuss arrangements, etc. AGENDA APPROVAL MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Orttel, to adopt the Agenda with the additions of 4h, L. Reimann - Rezoning; 4i, Feasibility Report/Woodridge Acres Sanitary Sewer; 5b, Appointment to Planning Commission/Elling; and Sc, Adoption of the Comprehensive Plan; and delete Item 4d, Hawk Ridge East - Final Plat Approval. Motion carried unanimous ly. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, to suspend the rules. Motion carried unanimous ly. BLAKE CONTRACTING - SPECIAL USE PERMIT Chairman Bosell reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the Special Use Permit of Blake Contracting to remove in excess of 400 cubic yards of dirt at 13533 Jay Street. It was noted the property is zoned LI. Council discussion was that the adjoining property owners have indicated no objection to the request. Mr. Schrantz also reviewed the grading plan he revised for the area. He stated the area could be paved at some point. MOTION bv Peach, Seconded by Orttel, introducing a Resolution approving a Special Use Permlt for Blake Contracting to excavate in excess of 400 cubic yards of material from the west half of Lot 13, Watts Garden Acres, as presented by the City Clerk, subject to a one-year review. (See Resolution R42-82) Motion carried unanimously. ECKHARDT - VARIANCE Chairman Bosell reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve a variance to allow Mr. Echardt to convey a 2l-foot strip of land from Parcel 1350, Plat 65930, tobe attached to Parcel 1370. Alfred Eckhardt, 14649 Seventh Avenue - stated there is no house on Parcel 1350. He owns both parcels of land. There lS access off l47th for Parcel 1350. Discussion was on the 66-foot easement in front of the lot, questioning the necessity of that easement. Mr. Eckhardt stated he came before the City to construct a driveway several years ago, and it was determined at that time that the City property could not be given back. Council agreed to have the Clerk research the history of the easement, the reason it was required, and who the land would revert to should the City decide to vacate it. MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Orttel, introducing a Resolution approving a variance request of Alfred Eckhardt to sever a 2l-foot by 233-foot piece from Parcel 1350, Plat 65930, to be joined with Parcel 1370, Plat 65930, as presented by the City Clerk with the change: the NOW THEREFORE paragraph, bottom line, Parcel 1250 should be Parcel 1350; and change the word "topography" to "Configuration" in the fourth line of the second WHEREAS. (See Resolution R43-82) Motion carried unanimously. Regular City Council Meeting June 15, 1982 - Minutes Page 3 STROEMER - VARIANCE Chairman Bosell stated the Commission errored by interpreting the ordinance to say Mr. Stroemer did nót need a variance to construct an enclosed deck within the required rearyard setback from a lake. Because it is attached, a variance is needed as the deck would be 65 feet from the river rather than the 7S-foot setback required in the Shoreland Zoning Ordinance. Carl Stroemer - explained his house has a wrap-around deck on the second floor of his house but has nothing underneath the deck. He wants to construct an enclosed deck 20 feet from the building with cement underneath it. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Lachinski, introducing a Resolution approving a varlance request for Carl Stroemer to allow him to build an enclosed attached structure within the required rearyard setback on shoreline lots. (See Resolution R44-82) Motion carried unanimously. LEGAL ACTION - LGA APPORTIONMENT Lloyd Schnelle, City Administrator of Ramsey, and Arnie Cox, Ramsey Councilman, were present. Mr. Schnelle explained that Ramsey, as well as Andover and other cities, are not getting a fair share of the State Aids. Ramsey has tried working through the League of Minnesota Cities and the Legislature in an attempt to correct the disparities in the State Aid formula, but those attempts have been unsuccessful. So Ramsey now feels that the only way any change is going to come about is through legal action and through the courts. Ramsey has already done a lot of research and work on this and feels they have a very good case. He has talked about this subject with Councilman Peach and provided him with a lot of background information; and they are there tonight at Councilman Peach's request to answer questions. Mr. Schnelle went on to explain there was a change made in the State Aid Formula in 1979 by the Legislature; however, because of the grandfather clause contained in the law, the change really didn't accomplish anything. He stated without the grandfather clause, the changes proposed would have eliminated some of the greater disparities that now ex i st. He also gave examples of the differences in the per capita of State Aids received by several cities, and explained why Isanti's per capita amount is so much higher. He stated they would be willing to meet with Andover's attorney and Council to review their research and legal action if it is so desired. In discussion with the Council, Mr. Schnelle stated there are many other cities who are affected the same way Ramsey and Andover are, but not too many have been willing to get involved either because they do not want to "rock the boat" or because they do not understand the situation. He stated they would prefer to have Andover participate as a friend of the court rather than as a plaintiff. Mayor Windschitl stated in principle he had no objection to participating, but felt the City Attorney should review the case and make an estimate of the City's cost to join the suit and make a recommendation to the Council. MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Orttel, authorizing the City Attorney to contact the flrm of Lang, Pauly, and Gregerson, and the Ramsey City Attorney Mr. Bill Goodrich and to prepare a report to the Council to determine what sort of aid we can give to Ramsey and to assist them in their lawsuit with the State, plus an estimated cost. DISCUSSION: Mr. Schnelle stated they are estimating the total cost to be between $10,000 and $20,000. Mr. Cox also stated that many of the legislators are unaware of the inequities in the law. The same problem exists in Andover; and it is important that they represent the citizenry. He explained the problem they had in attempting to solve the disparity via the legislative process, but they now feel the only way - Regular City Council Meeting June 15, 1982 - Minutes Page 4 (Legal Action - LGA Apportionment, Continued) some change will be brought about is through the courts. Mr. Cox went on to discuss the problem of taxation without representation, citing examples of how people are not aware of those taxes, namely those non-homestead properties, commercial, open land, apartments, etc. He stated business is being run out of the State because of the deceptive inequity in the tax system. He felt it is important that legislators with accountability be elected in all governmental units to get some of these laws back in an equitable manner. Mr. Cox also stated that if there is anything they can do to help the City of Andover, just let them know. Motion carried unanimously. AWARD CONTRACT - SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER Engineers Bradford Lemberg and Jim Moravek from Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc., reviewed the bids for the Senior Citizen Center and alternates summarized in the June 15, 1982, letter to the City Council of Contract Award recommendations. He stated the low bidder made an obvious mistake on the bid by marking $750 for Alternate M-l on the deduct line rather than the add line; therefore the figure would be $1,500 more than what the City Clerk was showing. That does not change Allstate Builders from being the low bidder. The Clerk stated there is $13,000 left of 1982 CDBG funds. Of that amount, $2,415 will be borrowed from Anoka County for this contract, and the remaining amount can be used on the building or for contingencies not figured into the contract. The contract includes the parking area, shrubbery, built-in microwave, etc., but it does not include a diswasher in the kitchen. It was suggested a dishwasher be added, though no action was taken on the suggestion. Councilman Jacobson stated the Alternate M-l heating unit is not the off-peak furnace he had suggested at a previous meeting. He estimated the cost of an off-peak furnace with ductwork to be not more than $7,500. Discussion with the engineers was that they had misunderstood what unit the Council asked for. Mr. Lemberg suggested a change order in the contract for the off-peak unit be negotiated and that Alternate M-l not be awarded at this time. Councilman Jacobson suggested they talk further with Anoka Electric about the matter. Councilman Jacobson also had some problem with the Alternates, feeling the installation of carpeting and paneling may not be necessary. He thought the building should be done as economically as possible and recommended providing only Alternates 3, 5, 7, and 13. Others on the Council felt that carpeting and paneling may be easier to maintain and is more durable. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Peach, enter a ReÞolution accepting bids and awarding contract for the construction of the Senior Citizen Center for the City of Andover with funding for same to be through Community Development Block Grant Funds combined with City funds. WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids for the construction of a Senior Citizen Center, bids were received, opened, and tabulated with the results as follows: (as shown in the prepared resolution); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby accept the bid of Allstate Builders of Minnesota in the amount of $108,580 as Base Bid, and also Alternates 1 through 14 in the amount of $7,318, delete the words "including M-l"; and the last paragraph, BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby agree to pay from City funds that portion of construction for City facilities in the amount of $4,210, those funds from the Park Improvement Funds. (See Resolution R45-82) VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Lachinski, Orttel, Peach, Windschitl; No-Jacobson for only Alternates 1-14, as he doesn't agree with all of them. Motion carr ied. - - Regular City Council Meeting June 15, 1982 - Minutes Page 5 (Award Contract - Senior Citizen Center, Continued) MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, introduce a Resolution requesting the engineering firm of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates to review and discuss Alternate M-l to the Andover Senior Citizens Center Addition to the City Hall to negotiate or determine a price for a heating system which would be an off-peak electric heating storage unit of sufficient size to heat the Addition. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, introducing a Resolution accepting transfer of 1981 Community Development Block Grant Funds and pledging repayment of same from City of Andover 1982 Allocation, as presented in the prepared resolution with the exception of the paragraph which reads NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the ( City of Andover to hereby accept up to, it reads up to $6,000, but insert the number $13,000 in 1981 Community Development Block Grant Funds from Anoka County. (See Resolution R46-82) Motion carried unanimously. LEGAL ACTION - ARDEN HILLS INTERCEPTOR Discussion was that the City of Andover will receive no benefit from the Arden Hills sanitary sewer trunk extension in Service Area #2, yet the City will be charged for the extension. Mr. Schrantz stated the City's charge is approximately $1,000; however, he was not sure whether that was a one-time charge or an on-going charge. Council noted they are already on record as being opposed to the extension. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Jacobson, that we direct the City Attorney to investigate the Arden Hills trunk acquisition by the Metropolitan Waste Water Commission and· report to the City. Motion carried unanimously. L. REIMANN - REZONING Chairman Bosell reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation to deny the rezoning request of Lloyd Reimann to rezone the property of Lot 2, Block 4, Pine Hills Addition, from R-l to General Business. Because there were so many unknowns with the request, it was difficult to determine whether or not it would be a guod use un that corner. The adjoining landowners in Pine Hills are opposed to the rezoning of the property, nor was there consent of the fee owner. There is also the question of accessibility. Frank Padula, 4550 l73rd Avenue NW - represented Mr. Reimann who was out of town this evening. He-Stated until the land is rezoned, it is difficult to know exactly what it will be used for or to get commitments from other businesses. They talked with the owners on the four corners of the piece of property, and he reviewed the zonings in that area. The land is located on the corner of two well traveled county roads and is the geographic center of the City. He felt it will only be a matter of time before it is zoned to some commercial because of that location. He felt that it is not feasible to place a residential house on that lot because of the busy intersection it would face. He felt a GB zoning on that lot would be a good buffer for those residents to the west. Mr. Padual also showed a plan of the location of a 40 x 60-foot building on the lot with driveway out to l6lst Avenue. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, introducing a Resolution to deny the rezoning request for Lloyd Reimann, 2813 l42nd Avenue NW, for the purpose of rezoning the property known as Lot 2, Block 4, Pine hills Addition from R-l to General Business for the reasons listed in the Planning Commission report to the City Council dated June 9, 1982. (See Resolution R47-82) DISCUSSION: Councilman Peach stated it appears it may be a reasonable request, but not all the information is known at this time. Councilman Orttel stated that there have been very few rezonings in the rural area in recent years; and any that have been done, some very specific future Regular City Council Meeting June 15, 1982 - Minutes Page 6 (L. Reimann-Rezoning, Continued) use has been required. And it makes it difficult to act on the request without that. Mr. Padula stated it gets expensive to have complete sets of drawings done and then to be denied by the Planning Commission and City Council. They are trying to do it the least expensive way, and that is why it was done this way. He stated it is also difficult to get commitments from others for business on that lot without the proper zoning. They are going on speculation at this point. Councilman Orttel explained that the GB zoning allows many things in it, some of which the City is not necessarily comfortable with in the rural area. Mr. Padula suggested the possibility of having different standards for zonings in the urban and rural areas. The Mayor noted the City is in the process of revising the zoning ordinances. Motion carried unanimously. Recess at 9:16; reconvene at 9:30 p.m. FEASIBILITY REPORT/WOODRIDQS ACRES SANlIARY SEWER PROJECT (Because the Mayor may be affected by the project, he stepped down to the audience for this item. Acting Mayor Orttel conducted this portion of the meeting.) Discussion was on whether or not a decision should wait until after a petition is received from the Shady Knoll area so the entire area could be done as one project. Also, without a petition a 4/5 vote would be required to order the improvement. W. Schrantz stated he has given George Lobb a petition to be taken around the Shady Knoll area. TKDA has indicated the construction could begin in October; however, the Council was concerned with not being able to complete the project this construction season. There was also concern of the City having to bear the cost of the feasibility report until such time as the project is ordered. Council agreed to proceed with the feasibility report for that entire area if TKDA would be willing to receive payment when the project is ordered. MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Peach, that we order a feasibility report for the Project 82-8A, Woodridge Acres Addition, including the Oaks and Shady Knoll ·Addition, from the firm of TKDA with the cost not to exceed $2,800 to be deferred until such time as the project is ordered. VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Jacobson, Lachinski, Orttel, Peach; NOT VOTING-Windschitl as he may be affected by the project. Motion carried. (Mayor Windschitl returned to conduct the remainder of the meeting.) GRADING PLAN FOR CITY HALL SITE Mr. Schrantz explained the grading plan would be used for staking purposes for grading the ballfields and soccer fields at the City Hall site according to the sketch plan approved by the Council several weeks ago. He felt it is important to have grading plans to be able to grade the fields to slope the right way, etc. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, that we authorize the firm of TKDA to prepare a grading plan for the City Hall park area using the sketch plan approved by the City Council, the cost of the work shall not exceed $2,000; and the money to come from budget item 455.30 of the Park Board budget. Motion carried unanimously. ~PPOINTMENT TO PLANNING COMMISSION/ELLING MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Lachinski, that we appoint Jim Elling to the Planning and Zoning Commission to fill the term of George Lobb until December 31, 1982. Motion carried unanimously. Regular City Council Meeting June 15, 1982 - Minutes Page 7 ADOPT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (Reference the June 14, 1982, memo from the City Clerk/A. Administrator relative to the Comprehensive Plan.) MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Lachinski, introducing a Resolution formally adopting the Andover Comprehensive Plan as amended, that is changing the date in the third WHEREAS of 18th of April, 1982, to 18th of May, 1982. (See Resolution R48-82) VOTE ON MOTI ON: YES-Jacobson, Lachinski, Orttel, Windschitl; NO-Peach Motion carried. PARK AND RECREATIQN COMMISSION/~OOKED LAKE BOAT LANDING/SHELTER MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, that the City Council authorize the purchase of a park shelter for the Crooked Lake park from the firm of Gametime for the price of $2,078.37 delivered for a 24' x 22' shelter as pictured with specifications attached to the letter to the City Council dated June 9, 1982, from the City Engineer. Motion carried unanimously. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT Chairman Bosell reviewed the Commission's conclusion that a Special Use Permit requested by J & J's Liquor for a deli in their building was not applicable. However, in reviewing this further, she stated other businesses in that zoning district do sell retail products; and rather than changing the zoning in the area, she asked the Council's opinion to allowing retail sales in an LI district by special use. Council suggested the Planning Commission hold a public hearing to amend the ordinance to allow retail sales in an LI district by special use permit. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, to adopt the City Council Meeting Minutes for June 1, 1982, as presented. VOTE ON MOTI ON : YES-Jacobson, Lachinski, Orttel, Peach; YES EXCEPT FOR THOSE AREAS THAT DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY AFFECT HIM-Windschitl. Motion carried. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Jacobson, that we approve the Minutes of the May 27 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS MOTION by Jë:.cúbson, Seconded by Lachinski, approval of Checks 4981 through 5026, noting that Check Number 5014 replaces Check No. 4761 which is voided, total amount of $25,872.11. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Lachinski, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 10:17 p.m. Respectfully submitted, \\~CC~l Mar lla A. Peach Recor ing Secretary