Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC June 1, 1982 ~ o¿ ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING -JUNE 1, 1982 AGENDA 1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M. 2. Resident Forum 3. Agenda Approval 4. Discussion Items * Board of Review Continuation a. Variance-V. Peiper b. Right-of-way/Hanson Boulevard c. Accept Petitions-Order Feasibility Report 1 ) Russell Addition Streets 2) Woodridge Acres Streets, Sanitary Sewer d. PIN Revisions/TKDA e. Rate Changes/Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates f. Noise Control Ordinance * g. Lakeridge Stub Street * h. Public Works Employee * i. Enterprise Fund Budgets j. 5. Non-Discussion Items a. Proposals for Ordinance Up-Date * b. Date for CIP Meeting 6. Reports of Commissions, Committees, Staff 7. Approval of Minutes 8. Approval of Claims 9. Adjournment ... ~. - - CITY 01 ANDOVER M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL COPIES TO: ATTORNEY, STAFF FROM: CITY CLERK/A. ADMINISTRATOR DATE: MAY 28, 1982 REFERENCE: AGENDA INFORMATION - JUNE 1, 1982 Item No. 3 - Agenda Approval Please add the following: (They were not on the published agenda) Item No. 4g - Lakeridge Addition Stub Street, 4h - Public Works Employee, and Item No. Sa - Proposals for Ordinance Up-Date. Also add: Item 4i - Enterprise Fund Budgets and Sb-CIP Meeting Date. Item No. 4a - Variance/V. Peiper Please find Planning & Zoning Commission recommendation for approval of a variance to erect a sign permit to sell farm vegetables. Ordinance No; 8, provides for a temporary sign to be placed on a piece of property in a residential area for a period not to exceed 30 days out of a 12-month period; and allows for a size of 10 sq.ft. but the lot may have 3 such signs for a total of 30 sq.. ft. A Resolution will be prepared granting approval for the provisions dealing with both time and size. There is no permit fee required. Item No. 4b - Right-of-Way/Hanson Boulevard Motions are required to direct the City Attorney to secure the required legal descriptions and begin negotiations for the right-of- way purchase for Hanson Boulevard between Andover Boulevard--and Crosstown Boulevard. Item No. 4c - Accept Petitions/Order Feasibility Reports 1) Russell Addition Attached is a draft resolution along with a petition for the improvement of streets in the Russell Addition. You will note that although 16Sth is not included in the petition, it is recommended that it does get included for the Feasibility Report. 2) Woodridge Acres Attched are draft resolutions and petitions for sanitary sewer and street improvement in the Woodridge Acres area. The resolutions must be adopted to order the Feasbility Report. - .. ~ '- Agenda Information June 1, 1982 Page 2 Item No. 4d - PIN Revisions This item is continued from previous meetings. TKDA is estimating the cost of up to $3,SOO to revise all our assessment books. Item No. 4e - Rate Changes/Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates This item has been continued from a previous meeting. You have received copies of the existing costs along with the revised costs for personnel. Item No. 4f - Noise Control Ordinance Attached is the proposed ordinance. Some minor changes have been made by the City Attorney since the copy you received on May 4. Item No. 4g - Lakeridge Stub Street Jim Schrantz has discussed the matter of construction of this street with all parties concerned, including the P&Z Chairman and the engineering firm doing the inspections on the streets in Lakeridge. He will have a report, along with recommendations. Item No. 4h - Public Works Person Attached please find correspondence from the Public Works Director and myself relating to the applicants and our recommendation. A motion is needed to approve the hiring, set the salary and the starting date. * Item No. Sa - Proposals for Ordinance Up-Date Attached is the Planning and Zoning Commissions' recommendation for the Consultant to re-do and codify our Ordinances to put them into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. In checking the records, there appears to be approximately $8,SOO left of the Planning Grant monies. This can be used for the Consultant, Attorney and publications. ** Item No. 6a - Park & Recreation Commission Attached is correspondence from the Park Commission requesting the approval of funds for various park purchases. Monies for this purchase will come from the Park Fund, not the Park Budget; therefore, the Council must approve all purchases. Item No. 7 - Approval of Minutes April 27, May 1, May 4, May 10, May 18. * Item No. 4i - Enterprise Fund Budgets ** Item No. 5b - Date for CIP Discussions (If the Council feels the above two items should be handled at Special Meetings due to discussion timœ, perhaps one meeting could be scheduled for both. - ,-, .-. ~ o¿ ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE 1, 19B2 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Jerry Windschitl on June 1, 1982, 7:30 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Anoka, Minnesota. Councilmen present: Jacobson, Lachinski, Orttel, Peach Councilmen absent: None Also present: City Attorney, William Hawkins; City Engineer, James Schrantz; Planning and Zoning Commission Chairperson, d'Arcy Bosell; City Clerk, P. K. Lindquist; and others RESIDENT FORUM Helen Franz, Ward Lake Drive - wondered if anything is going to be done about the dust problem on their road. She stated the problem gets worse every day and is being caused by a business enterprise in the area. She felt it was unfair that the residents have to put up with the dust and traffic from the time the snow melts until it snows again in the fall; and because the road is used mostly for interstate trucking, something should be done. Council noted no specific plans are being discussed and that it is a difficult problem that would best be solved by paving. The Engineer was directed to cost out the placement of magnesium chloride for dust control and to find out its life cycle. AGENDA APPROVAL MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Jacobson, to adopt the Agenda as published in the City paper with the addition of 4 (a), Board of Review Continuation; 4g, LakeRidge Stub Street; 4h, Public Works Employee; 4i, Enterprise Fund Budgets; and 4j, Sanitary Sewer Connection Ordinance. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, that we suspend the rules. Motion carrled unanimously. BOARD OF REVIEW CONTINUATION County Assessor Bob Weisbrich made the following recommendations: Albert Smith, 254 l50th Lane NW, Smith's Rolling Oaks - Mr. Weisbrich recommended that the appraisal be lowered from $95,600 to $92,800 because of an error shown in the square footage of the house. Lois Ostrander, Plat 65912, Parcel 6500 - Mr. Weisbrich recommended that the valuation be lowered from $73,300 to $67,000 because the basement was not finished following a fire in the house several years ago. Al Farnes, Plat 66792, Parcel 0600 - Mr. Weisbrich stated there has only been one sale in the ãrea long the creek, which was four years ago, for $16,000 on vacant property. The creek area is a unique piece of property because of its scenic qualities. The sales along the creek in Oak Grove ranged from $16,000 to $18,000. He also talked with most of the people living on the creek; and the discussions were the residents generally felt the valuation was accurate but that the taxes were too high for that area. Based on that and based on the fact that the current asking price of the Farnes' property is $22,000 more than the valuation, he felt the valuation for the property was fair and not over valued. Mr. Farnes - stated there are three lots for sale in Oak Grove at an asking prlce or-$17,SOO, and they are not selling. He felt it is unfair to compare these creek lots with river lots and felt that a $25,000 valuation for his lot - -- -~._- .->-,-- -- - . Regular City Council Meeting June 1, 1982 - Minutes Page 2 (Board of Review Continuation, Continued) (Al Farnes, Plat 66792, Parcel 0600, Continued) was absurd. He stated there is a house for sale on the Rum River of 1326 square feet with taxes of $924. He felt the attitude prevailing is that people living on the creek can afford the higher taxes. Mr. Weisbrich disputed the allegation stating a person's economics has nothing to do with determining the valuation of a piece of property. The valuation is made based upon an objective look at what that property could sell for. Council discussion was on the value placed on the creek lot. Mr. Weisbrich stated a bare lot across the street would be worth between $7500 and $8500, and would increase to about $11,500 to $12,500 if it was wooded, septic system added, etc. Mr. Farnes' lot is valued at $25,000 because it is a creek lot. The value for the lots along the creek in Andover ranged from $21,000 to $25,000, with Mr. Farnes' lot being one of the higher valued lots. Mr. Weisbrich also explained the formula used for determining the additional value to creek lots. Mr. Farnes - questioned the additional value placed on the creek because it is unusable. He bought the lot because it was wooded. It drops down about 100 feet from the back of the house to the creek and half of the land is swamp. The Council generally felt that the lot was assessed high and should be brought more in line with the other lots in the area. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, that we change the assessment on a lot 17922 Aztec Street, the current assessed valuation of $25,000 to an assessed valuation of $21,500 to bring the price of the lot in line with the others of sim;liar nature in that same area. Motion carried unanimously. Rudy Buthreiler, 3271 l74th Lane NW, Plat 67513 - Mr. Weisbrich recommended reducing the value from $81,100 to $77,200 because the lots had been combined. Delmar Nies, Plat 67796, Parcel 0036 - Mr. Weisbrich stated he viewed the property today, but he did not see any cattle. There have been no cases where property sells for less because of a fence and cattle behind it. There is a lot of property in Anoka County that has the back yard fenced. Therefore, he could not recommend a reduction in valuation for this property. Mr. Nies - disagreed with Mr. Weisbrich, feeling the market value should remain the same as the previous year because of the fence and cattle. He thought they were an eye sore, and indicated he would appeal his case to the County Board of Review. No action was taken by the City Council. Roger Hanson, Plat 65909, Parcel 0010 - Mr. Weisbrich stated there was an arbitrary assessment on the property and the records indicated a better-than- average finished basement. Upon viewing the property, it was found the basement is slightly below average, and he recommended a reduction in valuation from $71,500 to $62,900. Dr. and Mrs. Ronald Rehmann, 16350 Aargon Street NW, Plat 65981, Parcel 2520 - Mayor Windschltl acknowledged receipt of a letter from the Rehmann's-Tãwyer objecting to the valuation placed upon their homestead. Mr. Weisbrich stated an arbitrary assessment has been placed on the property because they have been unable to view it. He stated it is an above-average house, but he understood it is the Rehmann's intent to sue the County in this matter. No action was taken by the City Council. Regular City Council Meeting June 1, 1982 - Minutes Page 3 (Board of Review Continuation, Continued) MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Jacobson, that the City Council reduce the assessed valuation for the following properties for the following reasons: the property at 254 lSOth Lane in Smith's Rolling Oaks from $95,600 to $92,800 due to a lower value after reappraisal; the property at 16464 Crosstown from $73,300 to $67,000 due to re-evaluation after reappraisal and note that this property did have a fire in the basement which was actually never repaired; and the property at 3271 l74th Lane from $81,100 to $77,200 reflecting an error in combining the two lots into one; and the Roger Hanson property, 18046 Round Lake Boulevard, property value changed from $71,500 to $62,900 to reflect the correct valuation after being reassessed; and further that the City Council acknowledge the letter from Dr. Ronald E. and Mary K. Rehmann at 16350 Aargon Street NW, simply acknowledge the letter presented. Motion carried unanimously. VARIANCE - V. PEIPER Chairman Bosell reviewed the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation to approve the variance to erect a sign to sell farm vegetables. The ordinance allows a 28-square-foot sign, but the sign Ms. Peiper prepared before knowing of these dimensions is 32-square feet for a pick-your-own type operation. Also, Ms. Peiper has indicated limiting the sign to be up for 30 days would create a problem for her because the picking season is greater than 30 days. Vicki Peiper - stated having the sign up for four months would be a reasonable length of time. She stated she would take down the sign at the end of the picking season if that would be required. MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Orttel, that the City Council approve a variance request by Miss Vicki Peiper of the VP Garden Farms for a commercial sale sign to be located at approximately l79th Avenue and County Road g on her property according to Ordinance 8, Section 8.07, Section 3, Subsection i; the sign will be in excess of 30 square feet allowed by ordinance and will be approximately 32 square feet; it will be without restriction as to when it has to be removed; the sign is essentially in accordance with the ordinance; we have had no complaints from neighbors in the area; and it is necessary for the reasonable use of Mrs. Peiper's property. (See Resolution R36-82) Motion carried unanimously. RIGHT-OF-WAY/HANSON BOULEVARD MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Orttel, that we direct the City Attorney to begin the process of securing the required legal descriptions and begin negotiations with the landowners for right of way for the extension of Hanson Boulevard between Andover Boulevard and Crosstown Boulevard, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign such documents as may be necessary to implement this. Motion carried unanimously. ACCEPT PETITIONS - ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT/RUSSELL ADDITION STREETS Discussion was on the suggestion of ordering a feasibility study for Russell Addition and also for l6Sth going into the Addition to get an idea of the costs of that road. Mr. Schrantz stated one of the concerns of the residents is the typical street section. Would the street be constructed to a 32-foot width or could the street standards be deviated to utilize what is already there? There are some very narrow streets in the Addition. Councilman Lachinski suggested the feasibility study show the cost difference of building to the minimum City standards and of building a sub- standard street. Mayor Windschitl suggested costing it out at the normal street section, but that the City Engineer view the area and render an opinion as to what street section should be built. Regular City Council Meeting June 1, 1982 - Minutes Page 4 (Accept Petitions/Russell Addition Streets, Continued) Jim Sturgeon, 16555 Yakima Street - felt most of the people were under the impression that l65th was included in the petition. The biggest reason people want the road is to get l6Sth improved, because there is very little traffic on the streets within the residential area. l65th is also a problem for the City in upkeep. Most of the roads are 23 feet wide with Class 5 gravel and are ditched. He asked if it meant widening another 4 feet to put in bituminous. Council discussion was that the engineers will make a recommendation as to what street standard would be most reasonable. The normal street section would be 24-feet of blacktop with four-foot shoulders. Discussion was also on the Council's concern of assessing l6Sth and concern over the residents' reaction if the minimum street standard would be used which could change the appearance of the neighborhood. It was recommended the engineers meet with the residents to get their feelings and ideas. Mr. Sturgeon realized there was a problem with 165th but felt the residents would be wllling to discuss solving that problem in some way. MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Lachinski, that the Council approve the Resolution declaring adequacy of petition and directing preparation of a feasibility report for the improvement of street construction in the Russell-Stack Addition in Sections 12 and 13 along the Rum River, and direct the City Engineer and Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik to meet with the residents in the area and discuss possible construction and payment procedures, at a cost not to exceed $1,000. (See Resolution R37-82) Motion carried unanimously. ACCEPT PETITIONS/WOODRIDGE ~CRES STREETS, SANITARY SEWER (Because the matter may indirectly affect the Mayor, he stepped down to the audience at this time. Acting Mayor Orttel conducted this portion of the meeting.) Jerry Windschitl - stated there are homes that are close to 20 years old and have had a number of septic system problems over the years. To his knowledge a petition has not been circulated in the Shady Knoll area, but he guessed many would be in favor of sanitary sewer if such a petition were circulated. Mr. Schrantz noted that that area would be assessed some trunk line benefit. Mr. Windschitl - stated the question would be if the Council would want to notify that entire area that they could possibly be assessed for the trunk line and hold one public hearing for that area or to wait until a petition is received from Shady Knoll. Mr. Schrantz was also concerned about the City's share of the trunk line. In considering costs going past Shady Knoll, the costs may be more than what the City can finance. In this particular project there may be more trunk than area to assess based on $6S0-an-acre assessment. The Council may also want to consider putting in a lift station at a low point rather than having the trunk line so deep. Without a lift station, the line has to be so deep because the back of the lots in Shady Knoll and Woodridge are so low. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, that we ask the firm of TKDA to review the petition for sanitary sewer service for Woodridge Acres and surrounding area and to report back to us at our next regularly scheduled meeting of the Council as to their cost estimate to prepare the feasibility report for the area. VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Jacobson, Lachinski, Orttel, Peach; NOT VOTING-Windschitl Motion carried. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, that the City Council take note of petitions for bituminous streets from the Woodridge Acres area and declines to act on such petition at the present time, but to place the petition in the files until consideration of sanitary sewer in the area is decided first. Councilmen Lachinski and Jacobson WITHDREW the Second and the Motion. "., ... Regular City Council Meeting June 1, 1982 - Minutes Page 5 (Accept Petitions/Woodridge Acres Streets, Sanitary Sewer, Continued) MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, that we table declaring the adequacy of petltions for feasibility report for improving the bituminous streets in the area known as Woodridge Acres until resolution of sanitary sewer into the area is resolved. VOTE ON MOTI ON: YES-Jacobson, Lachinski, Orttel, Peach; NOT VOTING-Windschitl Motion carried. (Mayor Windschitl again chaired the meeting.) PIN REVISIONS/TKDA Councilman Lachinski stated he still had some problems with this and felt the County moved ahead with the PIN numbers without looking at all the ramifications. He suggested waiting for six months to a year to see if some of those problems are worked out, with the possibility of the County providin9 some of the services suggested from TKDA. MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Lachinski, to table the question of Pin Revisions at this time. Motion carried unanimously. RATE CHANGES/BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Jacobson, that the City Council approve the Bonestroo changes as recommended in their fee schedule revision by Bonestroo for the remainder of this year and direct the City Engineer to work out a compatible contract with TKOA and Bonestroo for the year 1983. DISCUSSION: was on the desirability of having comparable rates between the two engineering firms, although it was noted that each bills differently taking into account different factors. Council recessed at this time to allow Mr. Schrantz to review the TKDA contract for compatibility with the Bonestroo contract. This item to be continued later in the meeting. Recess at 9:02 p.m.; reconvene at 9:12 p.m. NOISE CONTROL ORDINANCE Section III, B., Second line, change to read: "...rise to noise which disturbs the peace, quiet or comfort of another person." Section IV, to read: "Any noise described herein which is plainly audible at the property line of a structure or building which is located, in the hallway or apartment adjacent, or at a distance of 50 feet if the source is located outside a structure or building between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. shall be prima facie evidence that the noise is excessive." MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Peach, to adopt the ordinance relating to noise, providing for the elimination and prevention of prohibited noise, and imposing penalties for violations as proposed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and amended by the City Council here this evening. Motion carried unanimously. RATE CHANGES/BONESTROO, CONTINUED Mr. Schrantz stated the contracts between the two firms are so different he didn't know how they could be compared. He also stated that other cities draw up their own contract so they have a similiar contract with all consulting engineering firms used by the City. Ms. Lindquist stated TKDA received a similiar increase on January 1 because they use a multiplier and salaries increased by 8 percent. VOTE ON MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Jacobson: Carried unanimously. Regular City Council Meeting June 1, 1982 - Minutes Page 6 LAKE RIDGE STUB STREET (Because the Mayor is indirectly affected by the issue, he stepped down to the audience. Acting Mayor Orttel conducted this portion of the meeting.) Mr. Schrantz reviewed his May 28, 1982, memo on the Tulip Street stub and completion of lS2nd Avenue in LakeRidge so the work can be done in the Lakeside Estates plat. He stated Mr. Carlson doesn't feel it is his responsibility to pay for the stub streets because his plat has already been accepted by the City. Apparently Mark Schumacher of TKOA did the inspection of the roads in the plat for the ,City, but the former City engineer recommended final acceptance of the roads and final release of the letter of credit. Mr. Schrantz stated the two stubs must be built, estimated the cost at $4,000 or less, and recommended approval of the construction of the stubs at this time and then a review of the case to determine who is responsible for the construction costs. Council discussion was on what has to be done to complete the two stub streets, questioning who is responsible for those costs and where the funds would come from at this time to pay for that construction. Some felt that TKDA should bear some responsibility since they were involved in the plat approval process of LakeRidge Estates, determining those roads, grades, drainage, etc., and accepted the streets. It was also suggested the costs for the construction of the two stub streets come from the Special Projects account for now. Mr. Schrantz also noted his concerns about the condition of the constructed street section in the LakeRidge Addition. MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Lachinski, that the City Council direct the City Engineer, Jim Schrantz, to contract with Kraabel Construction to have the roads in LakeRidge Addition of Tulip Street and lS2nd Avenue completed to the original plans and specifications or as requested by the City Engineer, and funds to be paid from the Special Projects of the General Fund of the City of Andover; and directing the parties involved in the original construction and approval of this street to attend a future City Council meeting to discuss liability of these costs. DISCUSSION: was again on what may have happened at the time the LakeRidge Addition was being constructed which resulted in these streets not being constructed to the property line. VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Jacobson, Lachinski, Orttel, Peach; NOT VOTING-Windschitl Motion carried. (Mayor Windschitl chaired the remainder of the meeting.) PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEE MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Jacobson, that the City hire Dale Mashuga as the Public Works Maintenance Person, permanent part-time, at a salary of $5.50 per hour. AMENDMENT TO MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Orttel, to include an increase to $6.00 an hour after 90 days upon successful acceptance of his work. VOTE ON AMENDMENT: Carried unanimously. VOTE ON MOTION: Carried unanimously. ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS/CIP MEETING - DATE MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Peach, that we schedule the Capital Improvement Plan OìSëüšsion and the Enterprise Fund Budget discussion for June 10 following the public hearing on Municipal State Aid Streets. VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Jacobson, Orttel, Peach, Windschitl; NO-Lachinski as he felt more time will be needed to discuss the CIP Plan. Motion carried. ,....-. Regular City Council Meeting June 1, 1982 - Minutes Page 7 SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION ORDINANCE MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Lachinski, introduce an Ordinance No. 32B, an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 32, an Ordinance known as the Sanitary Sewer Ordinance, adopted the 25th Day of November, 1975, by the City Council of the City of Andover as proposed by the City Clerk, but change the word in the second to last line " ...wastewater disposal facilities may be cleaned... n VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Lachinski, Orttel, Peach, Windschitl; NO-Jacobson Motion carried. MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Orttel, introducing a Resolution directing that direct connection shall be made with the public sewer within two years of the availability of said sewer system. (See Resolution R38-82) VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Lachinski, Orttel, Peach, Windschitl; NO-Jacobson Motion carried. PROPOSALS FOR ORDINANCE UP-DATE Chairman Bosell reviewed the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation for a consultant to update Ordinances 8 and 10, that either one of the firms of Wehrman Consultants Associated or Barton-Aschman Associates be hired. Both firms suggested costs could be reduced by providing only one master of all updated ordinances and the City take the responsibility for the reproduction of them or to do some typing at the City. Both firms will make all planning-related ordinances compatible. The Commission feels either firm would do what they are looking for. Council discussion was on the experience and expertise of each firm. It was noted Wehrman Consultants had clients of various surrounding cities, that reference checks of the firm brought positive responses from those communities, but that it is the most expensive quote. It was also noted that Barton-Aschman Associates had expertise in the area of transportation which may be valuable to the City and that positive responses were also received from the reference checks. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, to accept the bid of Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., based upon their letter to the City of Andover dated March 2, 1982, subject to legal counsel review of their contract. Motion carried unanimously. PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Orttel, that we approve the Park Board purchase of equlpment for Northwoods East park equipment as per their memo to the City Council dated 5-5-82. Motion carried unanimously. VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Lachinski, that the City Council regretfully accept the resignation of Judy Bush as Rescue Coordinator for the Fire Department. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 27, May 1, May 4, May 10, May 18, 1982: Correct as written. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, approval of Meeting Minutes of the City Council for April 27 and May 1. Motion carried unanimously. .....-. Regular City Council Meeting June 1, 1982 - Minutes Page 8 (Approval of Minutes, Continued) MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Orttel, approval of the City Council Meeting Minutes as presented for the May 4 and May 18 meetings. VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Jacobson, Lachinski, Orttel, Peach; YES except for those portions of the meeting that directly or indirectly involve himself-Windschitl. Motion carried. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Orttel, approval of the City Council Meeting Minutes as presented for May 10. VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Jacobson, Orttel, Peach; YES except for those portions of the meeting that directly or indirectly involve himself-Windschitl; ABSTAIN-Lachinski Motion carried. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, that we approve Checks 4959 through 4980 for $10,537.16. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 10:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~~..~~¡ Mar lla A. Peach Recordìng Secretary