Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC August 5, 1980 ~ 01 ANDOVER REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - AUGUST 5, 1980 AGENDA 1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M. 2. Resident Forum 3. Agenda Approval 4. Discussion Items a. Special Use Permit/So Chinander b. Sea1coating c. Cross Streets/Future Subdivisions d. City Council Sa1aries/1981 e. Set Bond Sale Date - 1980-3, 1980-4 * f. Southwest Area (1980-3)- Water Service Area, Laterals, 139th Avenue 5. Non-Discussion Items a. Date for Auditor Interviews b. Insurance-Temporary Employees c. Summer School Report * d. Biting Dog Ordinance 6. Reports of Committees, Commissions, Boards a. Planning & Zoning Commission b. Park & Recreation Commission l)Expenditure of Committed Funds c. Other Committees 7. Approval of Minutes 8. Approval of Claims 9. Adjournment ~ 01 ANDOVER REGCLAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - AUGUST 5, 1980 MINUTES The Regular Bi-¡~0nch1y ¡'ieei;ing of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Jerry Windschit1 on August 5, 1980, 7:30 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Anoka, Minnesota. Councilmen present: Jacobson, Lachinski, Orttel, Peach Councilmen absent: None Also present: City Attorney, William G. Hawkins; TKDA Engineers, John Davidson and Mark Schumacher; City Engineer, Larry Winner; City Clerk, P. K. Lindquist; and others RESIDENT FORUM Steve Nichols - stated they are filling in Northwoods park; however, he questioned the desirability of the contents being put in there. He showed pictures of concrete, garbage, wood, wire, lunch bags, beer and pop cans, chunks of blacktop, etc., being put in the park. He has also heard that after burying blacktop, it will eventually work its way to the surface again in the future. They are also dumping on one private lot as we 11. Mr. Schumacher stated that the owner has indicated that he would allow the lot to be filled. He was not aware that they are filling with pieces of blacktop and will check that out. The area will be top dressed. Mr. Davidson stated that blacktop generally hasn't had a tendency to surface in the future. Mr. Schumacher is to view the site. AGENDA APPROVAL MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Ortte1, that we approve the Agenda as published with the addition of the following items: 4f, Southwest Area: A, Water Service, B, Laterals on Round Lake Boulevard, C, Construction of 139th Avenue; and 4g, Quinn Drive Improve- ment. Motion carried unanimously. Jacobson Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Peach, Seconded by , that we suspend the ru les. SPECIAL USE PERMIT/S. CHINANDER MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Peach, Resolution R94-80, as presented to the Council ln wrltten form tonight with the exception of Item No.8 that appears therein. Item No.8 presently reads: The property is not served by public water and the solution to that will be handled by the Building Official. I would like to delete that and in its place, No.8, insert the following: The Council recognizes that the lot is not served by public water and therefore authorizes the use of private wells. (A Resolution approving a special use permit for Steven Chinander to construct a 2-fami1y home on Plat 65933, Parcel 1690.) DISCUSSION: Steven Chinander - stated that at the present time it is planned that the building will be rented and under single ownership. He may sell the building, but he has no considera- tion for splitting each unit relative to ownership. Greg Rothnem, Attorney re)resenting Mr. Chinander - stated that given the fact that the surroundlng dwelllngs on 38th Street are multlples, that this particular use is con- sistent with that use. Since the County has stated the lot should front on 138th, they then felt it would be more appropriate to have the building on this lot consistent with 138th Street dwellings, that of a multiple dwelling. And because this lot would be facing 138th, he felt it would not be setting a precedent for multiples in that area along Crosstown Boulevard. Mayor Windschit1 questioned if it is fronting 138th, would that side be the basis for the assessment for the street construction. Normally the lot would be assessed on the short side or that side facing County Road 18. It was his opinion that the lot should remain single family facing Crosstown. Councilman Peach stated that they have requested the address be changed to 138th and that that be the front of their lot; therefore, he ~gu1ar City Council Meeting August 5, 1980 - Minutes Page 2 (Special Use Permit/So Chinander, Continued) felt that the 138th side would be receiving the benefit of the project and should be assessed on that side for the street. Councilman Lachinski felt that it should be assessed as has been done in the past, which is on the short side. Discussion continued on the assessment rate for the street improvement project, the size of the lot, and the City's assessment policy; with the Clerk noting that the assessments for the sanitary sewer were based on 138th Avenue side. Mr. Rothnem stated that they will comply with the applicable guidelines in effect. If it is determined that they are to pay the assessments on the 138th Street side, they will comply with that. VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Jacobson, Lachinski, Ortte1, Peach; NO-Windschit1 Motion carried. SEALCOATING MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Peach, introducing Resolution R95-80, a Resolution accepting plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bids for the seal- coating of all streets in the Northwoods Addition, Northwoods Second Addition and all Red Oaks Additions. Motion carried unanimously. CROSS STREETS/FUTURE SUBDIVISIONS Attorney Hawkins stated that it is legal to restrict the placement of a house on a 2~-acre lot based on setback requirements to provide for future subdivision. He felt an ordinance should be adopted indicating that that would be a setback requirement. And he agreed that there is no question it will mean additional work, as someone will have to stake out future streets, write descriptions for them, etc., and there are a lot of extra costs to do this. Council discussion was that a lot owner would not necessarily have to construct the house within the boundaries of the future subdivision of the particular lot but would not be able to cOnstruct the house where the streets in the future subdivision would be located. MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Jacobson, directing the Planning and Zoning Commission to amend Ordinances 8 and 10 requiring that when an individual applies for a building permit on an R-l platted area, he shall submit a site plan showing the location of the proposed structure on the lot so that the builder is aware of the proposed resubdivision of said lot. The home shall be placed so that it will not be in conflict with the proposed street patterns of said resubdivision. Motion carried unanimously. CITY COUNCIL SALARIES/1981. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Ortte1, that we retain the present salary schedule for two years. Motion carried unanimously. SOUTHWEST AREA (1980-3) - WATER SERVICE AREA Mr. Davidson reviewed TKDA's letter of August 5, 1980, relative to the revised water service area for the SW area, reviewing the area on an overhead map, noting approximately 480 acres could be serviced with a 250,000-ga110n overhead storage tank and two 750-gpm wells and pumphouse. If part of the costs are to be recovered in the user rate, then based On a user rate of 60¢/1,000 gallons, the area charge for the entire area would be $l,250/acre. This alternate would provide fire protection capability within the design area to 1,500 gpm requirements, which is considerably greater than the 500 gpm fire figh~ing capability under the minimal domestic water supply that has been proposed previously. Council discussion with the Engineers was On the various proposals for the water system; that the proposal is $400 more per acre than what was presented at the public hearing, although more area has been included; that the revised proposal with overhead storage Regular City Council Meeting August 5, 1980 - Minutes Page 3 (Southwest Area - Water Service Area, Continued) may lower insurance classification for the area, although Councilman Ortte1 questioned whether the City's classification for fire insurance rating would be split for different areas, as cities are not subdivided anymore for such classifications. Mr. Davidson explained that the present proposal is for the one well now. When the City has reached 160 acres of saturation, a second well would be put in; and then after that 240 acres is saturated, then an expanded service area would be identified, probably requiring a 500,OOO-ga110n storage tank. Mayor Windschit1 felt that the saturation point may be reached quite quickly in light of proposed developments of Good Value, Sonsteby, and possibly Chutich, all located west of Round Lake Boulevard. Stan Deden, 13836 Round Lake Boulevard - stated that the Anoka hydrant is within 1,000 feet from where they live. The houses in their development have a 6 rating on their insurance. Councilman Ortte1 really didn't think the classification for the City would be split for different areas, but speculated the rating for the entire City may be compromised to a 7 or 8 rather than a 9. Discussion continued noting if the City went with the revised water system, that there will have to be a deferred assessment on portions of it, as it will take some time to collect enough from the user charge to pay for the overhead storage tank. Mr. Davidson stated an alternative is to establish a sinking fund for capital improvements within the water supply in which water user revenue, connection charges, etc., could be put in the fund. Mr. Davidson also stated that to go with this revised water system would not create a delay in the project. Some temporary water supply may have to be supplied to those wanting to construct this fall, which could be a rather inexpensive system. He has not talked to those property owners that would be affected by the expanded water service area. The Council also questioned whether those properties involved in this expanded service area which are presently in Green Acres can be assessed. The Clerk was directed to check into this further. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Peach, that we continue addressing the subject for another five minutes. Motion carried unanimously. Councilman Ortte1 stated that he would try to find out how the insurance ratings would be affected for the City if the revised water system with overhead storage tank was constructed. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, to continue with the plans as they presently are to put in one well with the pneumatic pressure tank in the area previously determined; and then when development warrants it, put the second well in west of Round Lake Boulevard; and then when development warrants the addition of some facilities, put in an overhead storage tank. DISCUSSION: was on the mechanics and costs of the expansion of the water facility. Mr. Davidson explained that assuming Northg1en reached saturation, at that point if Good Value or Sonsteby, etc., would development their property, a second well would need to be constructed. The cost of the pressure pneumatic system is approximately $70,000. Mr. Davidson stated that it would be possible to go with a 250,OOO-ga110n elevated tank with one 750-gpm well at this time at a cost of approximately $630,000. He was directed to check with some of the major property owners in the water service area to see if they would be willing to waive the 429 public hearing process for water at this time to be assessed on an area basis for the water. Council generally felt that if this could be done, it would be providing greater fire protection at a cost that is not much more than what was proposed at the original public hearing. Either a new public hearing would be called for those property owners not wishing to waive the hearing process or deferring the water assessment until such time as they would develop their property. A determination would then be made of the cost of the water assessment to new areas coming in, which would also include monies to be put in a sinking fund to provide for the second well when it is needed. If none of the major land owners are willing to participate in the water assessment at this time, the City would go with Regular City Council Meeting August 5, 1980 - Minutes Page 4 (Southwest Area - Water Service Area, Continued) the original proposal of a pressure pneumatic tank at this time. Mr. Davidson indicated that to change to the overhead-type system should not delay the project. They will be opening bids for construction of the first well on August 13. Councilmen Lachinski and Jacobson WITHDREW the Second and the Motion. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Peach, that the Engineers contact the major property owners in the proposed water service area and explain the proposed changes to them, ask them their opinion of it, and report back to the Council at the next regular meeting with waivers to the 429 if appropriate, and invite those property owners to the next regular Council meeting for an informational hearing on the matter. Motion carried unanimously. DATE FOR AUDITOR INTERVIEWS MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, to authorize the Mayor and Finance Committee of the City Council to interview auditors and make a recommendation on the selection of the auditor for the coming year. Motion carried unanimously. INSURANCE - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Ortte1, to allow temporary employees to apply for membership under the City's Group Insurance Programs at the discretion of the City Acting Administrator; with the City paying no premium costs. Motion carried unanimously. SOUTHWEST AREA - LATERALS ON ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD Mr. Davidson explained that they have reached an agreement with Rademacher that the City will construct the sanitary sewer laterals into the shopping center over easements to be given to the City, to be bid as public facilities as was proposed in the final plans and specs. If the costs are greater than what Rademacher could do it for privately, the matter will be reconsidered. Mr. Schumacher reviewed a map showing that all properties along Round Lake Boulevard can be served with sanitary sewer laterals as proposed in the final plans and specifications. Volk's property is the only property that won't be able to be served by a direct lateral at this time unless an extension would be done now. Mike Alexander, 1430 Round Lake Boulevard - stated that to his knowledge the residents ln the area stlll do not want the lateral line. He understood several weeks ago that it was proposed that laterals would not be run along Round Lake Boulevard, but now they are. Why will they be getting lateral lines when they petitioned against it? Mayor Windschit1 explained that it is generally the Council's position that when serving an area, all houses within a reasonable area from the line would be serviced so that pockets within a service district aren't left unless it is a large undeveloped piece of property. Floyd Sheppard, 14225 Round Lake Boulevard - stated he does not intend to divide his 3~-acre parcel and lS opposed to havlng to pay additional stubs to be installed for future subdivision. The way his house and garage are situated,. there is only 140 feet of the 340 feet of frontage that is not used; and because of the swamp, only approxi- mately 2 acres would be developable. No action was taken by the Council relative to this matter. The parcels will be provided service as proposed by the Engineers at the public hearing. SOUTHWEST AREA - 139TH AVENUE Mr. Schumacher stated that he hasn't been able to contact the property owner whose drive- way exits onto the half-street of 139th; however, due to the location of the house, it would not be feasible to have that driveway changed to exit onto Underc1ift. Right now Regular City Council Meeting August 5, 1980 - Minutes Page 5 (Southwest Area - 139th Avenue, Continued) that street is left out of the project and could be added if the Council chooses to improve it. Councilman Ortte1 suggested that it be determined to whom. the property would revert in the event the City would vacate the road easement. Given that information, the property owner may be better able to make a determination if he would want that as a long driveway if the City vacates the road easement. However, the City would retain the utility easement through there. An unidentified property owner in that area indicated he would prefer to have 139th vacated so the trees could be left in. MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Orttel, that we have the Attorney look at the legals and determine just where the land would go and to what property owners and have it on the Agenda for the next meeting; and if at that time we want to vacate it, we can. And also have somebody try to contact the owner of the property. DISCUSSION: A property oWner in the audience indicated he was going to try to set up a meeting with the property owners and engineers relative to this matter. Mr. Deden stated they have discovered there is no easement for the service road written into the legals of their lots. They felt it would be better in the long run to have the street vacated, as it would help to eliminate the dirt bikes going through that area. Motion carried unanimously. SET BOND SALE DATE - 1980-3, 1980-4 Mr. King Forness of Springsted, Inc., summarized their review and recommendation of the issue (Reference RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA, FINANCING OF 1980 IMPROVFMENT PROJECTS, SERIES B, Study No. 2047 dated August 5, 1980, by Springsted, Inc.). He reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of the options of selling the bonds over a 20-year period or for a temporary issue maturing in three years at which time the difinitive bonds would be sold based On the amount necessary at that point. Council and Mr. Forness had a very lengthy discussion relative to the deterioration of the bond market at this time; that long-term bond issues today are in the area of 8.5 to 8.75 percent effective rate; that the bond issue would be for $4,365,000 for 10ng- term bonds, assuming assessments being filed in 1981; that the bond issue would be for $4,240,000 for temporary improvement bonds; that at the time the project is assessed, it will be assessed based on actual costs and any overissuance would be placed in a sinking fund to retire some of the temporary issues; and that it is felt that due to the size of the issue, it will be a one-bid situation, which Springsted felt probably would also happen even if the project was split in two. Discussion continued relative to the potential risks and advantages of the temporary bond issue. Springsted is recommending an island call if the City goes with the permanent bonds, which will take all bonds maturing from 1990 out and have them callable as early as 1986, which means that approximately 74 percent of the issue would be callable and which may have an appreciable affect on the interest rate. It was noted that the bulk of the assessments in the improvement project are against undeveloped property, which may generate a lot of prepayments of assessments as the development occurs and which can then be used to retire the bond early. Wes Mand - asked what the call provision does to the individual property owner's assessment? Mayor Windschit1 stated that it has no affect on the assessments. Anyone can payoff the assessment at any time they want, or they can cOntinue to pay the assessment over the time period established for the project. The interest rate to the individual assessment will probably be the same whether a temporary or permanent bond is issued. Council then debated as to whether the bond issue should be sold as a temporary three- year issue or over the 20-year time period. Council generally agreed to sell the 20- year $4,365,000 long-term bond issue. Regular City Council Meeting August 5, 1980 - Minutes Page 6 (Set Bond Sale Date - 1980-3, 1980-4, Continued) ~OTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Ortte1, introducing a Resolution providing for the issuance of sale of $4.365 million General Obligation Improvement Bonds, 1980 Series B, Be it resolved by the City Council, City of Andover as follows: as presented, with the project designation being the City of Andover 1980 Improvement Bonds 1980-3 and 1980-4 at an estimated cost of $4.365 million. (See Resolution R96-80) Motion carried unanimously. Recess at 9:44; reconvene at 9:55 p.m. SUMMER SCHOOL REPORT Jim Stewart and Nancy Hageman were present. Ms. Hageman reviewed the 1980 summer school program, noting the success of the recreation on wheels program, the Thursday events program, the baseball programs, etc., and also noting that a total of 1033 students had been served in the 6-week period at a cost of about $6 per person. Ms. Hageman also reviewed the proposed summer school budget for 1981. The total budget is proposed for $6,910, which is more than for 1980 and the increase mainly reflects a proposal for a salary increase for the supervisors to approximately $4.25 an hour. That figure also represents revenue from fees for baseball, morning and afternoon playground, and little school, etc. She also explained that the fees for little school have always been higher due to the lower ratio of students to supervisor and the philosophy of having preschool being self-sustaining. Mr. Stewart also stated that the program is geared for a specific audience and special program. During the discussion, some Counci1members expressed the opinion of not charing a fee for the morning or afternoon playground activities. There was also some question as to the justification for the large increase in the salary for supervisors. Mr. Stewart explained that this is the proposal they will be making to all communities, and Andover is the first Council they have approached on this. He stated that the present wages are low compared to any recreation program in the State of Minnesota, and it is beginning to get difficult hiring people at these wages. Mr. Stewart and Ms. Hageman will be before the Park Board this week relative to the budget; and the Park Board will make a recommendation to the City Council on the matter. Mr. Stewart then explained that there is a cash balance of $1800 left from the 1979 summer program and $627 left from the 1978 program. It has been established that about $400 will be needed this year for a settlement for community school coordinators, and it is estimated that a portion of the cash balance will go for Andover's share of that settlement. He asked the Council's preference as to what to do with the remaining cash balance, either refunding it to the City with a check or leaving it in the account to be credited toward future years. Council generally agreed to have the balance refunded to the City by check. PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION - FOREST MEADOWS PARK Mr. Mand reviewed the Park Commission's recommendation to allow Manley Magnuson to lease Forest Meadows Park to enlarge his sod operation. Mr. Maånuson - stated he would like to use about three to four acres of the park to be cleare , drained, and seeded. The area is presently high brush and swamp. It would take a period of time to grind it up and level it out, and in about a year the land would be ready for seed.ing. Mr. Hawkins stated that the City has:the right to put restrictions on the use of parks, and he didn't see any problem in the proposal as long as what Mr. Magnuson is proposing is not totally inconsistent with the. area as it is and as long as the City is receiving some benefit; in this case, improving the area. The ultimate end is furthering the park purpose, and the City can place that type of restriction. The City is getting a lot of free leveling that it would otherwise have to pay for. 0' Regular City Council Meeting August 5, 1980 - Minutes Page 7 (Park & Recreation Commission - Forest Meadows Park, Continued) Mr. Magnuson stated that the depletion of the land from removal of the sod is about 1/8 to 1/4 inch a year. It is very minimal and wouldn't lower the land. Councilman Lachinski wanted it understood that if someone were to in any way damage the sod field in the park, the City would in no way be liable. MOTION by Ortte1, Seconded by Peach, that the Council direct the City Attorney to prepare an agreement with Mr. Manley Magnuson for the use of the Forest Meadows Park as outlined in the recommendation by the Park and Recreation Commission for up to a four-year period. DISCUSSION: Mr. Magnuson explained that after the final year of the contract, the sod would volunteer back the next year. If the City wants to seed the other part, he would help out with his equipment if the City would furnish the seed and fertilizer, which he estimated would be around $1,000 total. He will not do any excavating of the land, just tilling it up. Mr. Mand stated the Park Board will absorb the cost of preparing the lease. Motion carried unanimously. VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT Discussion with Fire Chief Bob Palmer was on the question of payment of workmen's compensation to Ray Sowada for his injury during the First Aid training course last year. Councilman Orttel and the City Clerk are to research the definition of what is covered under Workmen's compensation for Fire Department activities and to obtain the written State opinion relative to the matter. Chief Palmer stated that his insurance has not yet given him definite figures to cover his vehicle as an emergency vehicle for the Fire Department, but the recommendation from his insurance agent was negative on the matter. Chief Palmer stated that Ed Fields has said they would sell the trail blazer to the Fire Department for $1,000 and postpone billing until after the first of the year. After giving the matter further thought, Chief Palmer felt it would be better to have the trail blazer as the Chief's car for the Department. The question is where the funds would come from for the vehicle. Insurance has been estimated at $300 to $350 a year. No Council decision was made on the matter until the Chief can determine where the funds will come from. Assistant Fire Chief Tom May reported they have a total of $5,042.64 in their budget for capital improvements. They would like to purchase an air compressor for replacing breathing air at a cost of about $3,585, and he explained the problems they have keeping pressure in their cascade air tank system. They would also like to purchase two more sets of breathing apparatus at a cost of approxiamte1y $1,800. The Department has applied for and received a grant from the DNR for $1,000; however, the condition of the grant is that a paid receipt must be presented before receiving the money. That grant would bring the net cost of the equipment requests to $4,385. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Peach, that we authorize the Fire Department to purchase two sets of breathing apparatus and the air compressor to recharge their air bottles, total amount not to exceed $5,385. Motion carried unanimously. PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION - EXPENDITURES OF COMMITTED FUNDS Discussion with Mr. Mand was that the Park Board should establish a program for recommending improvements to those parks that have monies dedicated specifically for them. Mr. Mand stated that they are in the process of establishing such a program. QUINN DRIVE IMPROVEMENT Mr. Winner explained they had received a complaint from the Post Office Department about the sand on Quinn Drive and the inability to drive vehicles through there. Public Works tried just grading, but it was all sugar sand with some peat underneath it and Regular City Council Meeting August 5, 1980 - Minutes Page 8 (Quinn Drive Improvement, Continued) no hard base. They had to haul in class 5 to build up a base in order to avoid the problem in the future. The $3,000 was a total cost, including Kraabel's labor for hauling in dirt, cost of materials, and the City's time. MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Lachinski, to approve a cost not to exceed $3,000 for the placement of Class 5 gravel on Quinn Drive. Motion carried unanimously. DOG BITE ORDINANCE MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Lachinski, that we send the ordinance known as the Dog Bite Ordinance to the P & Z for their review and recommendation. DISCUSSION: Councilman Peach felt that it would be a waste of time to send it to the Planning Commission, as the City Clerk can modify it to the City's needs. Mr. Hawkins felt that the problem could be handled by declaring the vicious dogs nuisances, perhaps by adding a couple paragraphs in the existing Dog Ordinance of the City. He wondered if this is something that the Council wants to deal with. There are a lot of procedural things in the ordinance that may be dispensed with. He suggested possibly putting a section in the Dog Ordinance making it a misdemeanor to have a vicious dog, that the City has the right to declare these types of dogs nuisances, adding provisions for impounding the dog, and instructions by the Sheriff and dog catcher rather than sending it to th e Counci 1. Councilman Peach stated that what this ordinance accomplishes is the person who was offended and the person who owns the dog both go away satisfied without hard feelings between each other; and it also insures that the dog owner makes more of an effort to control his dog ifit shows signs of being dangereous. But he didn't see the need for it to go to the Planning Commission. Others on the Council also stated they would prefer that whatever is done with it, that it be added to the current Dog Ordinance rather than making it a separate ordinance. VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Jacobson, Lachinski, Orttel, Windschit1; NO-Peach Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 19, 1980; June 23, 1980; July 1, 1980: Correct as written. July 22, 1980: Page 4, third paragraph, change1,000-ga110n on-the-ground tank to 100,OOO-ga110n on-the-ground tank Page 5, under Ordinance No. 35C - By-Laws, change Resolution number to: (See Resolution R90A-80) MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Jacobson, that we approve the Minutes of June 19, June 23, and July 1 as amended. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Lachinski, Seconded by Jacobson, that we approve the Minutes of July 22 as amended. VOTE ON MOTI ON: YES-Jacobson, Lachinski, Peach, Windschit1; ABSTAIN-Ortte1 Motion carried. MOTION by Jacobson that we extend the meeting for 5 minutes. Motion died for lack of a second. Councilman Jacobson stated that it is past 11:30 and according to the new Resolution, the Council cannot do any more business. Regular City Council Meeting August 5, 1980 - Minutes Page 9 APPROVAL OF CLAIMS MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Ortte1, approval of Checks 3290 through 3320 for a total of $36,387.20 and Check Numbers 371 through 375 for a total of $17,823.93. VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Lachinski, Ortte1, Peach, Windschit1; NO-Jacobson, as it is past 11 :30 p.m. Motion carried. MOTION by Peach, Seconded by Lachinski, to adjourn. VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Lachinski, Ortte1, Peach, Windschit1; ABSTAIN-Jacobson Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 11:33 p.m. Respectfully submitted. '~~-4~~ Mar 11a A. Peach Recoräing Secretary . .