HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC October 17, 1978
I
~U"fV o~ ßlY![!})@'fff2lJl
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - OCTOBER 17, 1978
AGENDA
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
2. Resident Forum
3. Agenda Approval
4. Public Fcarings
Clean Air Act - R'representative
5. Legal and Engineering
a. Rezoning (Conroy)
b. Preliminary Plat (Wobegon Woods)
c. Preliminary Plat (Rum River Forest)
d. Special Use Permit (Mistelske)
e. Road Location (DeGardner)
£. Junkyard License (International Recycling)
g. ~ewer Repair Responsibility - Kaess
h. C.A.B. Interceptor
6. Ordinances and Resolutions
a. Ordinance No. 8 and Ordinance No. 10 _ Amendments
7. Petition s, Reque sts, Cornmunications
8. Reports of Boards, COInmittee s, Commissions
a. Planning & Zoning Commission
b. Park/Recreations Commission
c. Road Committee
d. Volunteer Fire Department
e. Personnel Committee
f. Other Committees -
9.. Unfinished Busines s
10. New Bnsines s
a. Regional Meetinlf
b. Nove!!lber Regu ar Meeting - Reschedule
11. Approval of Minutes
12. Approval of Claims
13. Adjournment
-
~ 01 ANDOVER
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
October 17, 1978
MINUTES
The Regular Bi-monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order
by Acting Mayor Ken Orttel on October 17, 1978 at 7:30 P.M. at the Andover Community
Center, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Anoka, Minnesota.
Counci1members·present: Ted Lachinski, Bob McClure, Mayor Jerry Windschitl
(arrived at 8:27 P.M.)
Councilmember absent: Mary VanderLaan
Also present: City Attorney - William G. Hawkins, City Clerk - patricia K.
Lindquist, City Engineer from T.K.D.A. - John Davidson, Chairman
of the Planning and Zoning Commission - Larry Retzlaff, and others
Agenda Approval
Motion by McClure, seconded by Lachinski, to approve the agenda as published
with the following changes: the deletion of 5d - Special Use Permit (Miste1ske) ;
the addition of 2g - Sewer Repair Responsibility (Kaess); 5h - C.A.B. Interceptor;
6a - Ordinance 8 and Ordinance 10 Amendments; 6b - Resolution for the Appointment
of Election Judges; lOb - November Regular Meeting Reschedule; 10c - Public
Works Conference; 10d - Water Quality Plan 208. Motion carried unanimously.
Resident Forum
Winslow Ho1asek was concerned about the ditch banks along Prairie Road. He mentioned
that the mowing that was done recently looks good. But, those ditch banks that
were never seeded have grown up to weeds and are not stabilized. The dirt has
washed away and the sand is exposed. The contractor was to see that the banks
were stabilized. Engineer Davidson informed him that the contractor is relieved
of all responsbi1ity now for stabilization. On all State highway jobs once the
top soil and seed is laid and the mulch is in place, it becomes the responsibility
of the State. If there is additional washing that takes place, then the State
does, on a change order, add additional stabilization material. In this case it
would revert to the City. There were some portions that weren't seeded. The
City still has the 1-year guarantee on the road. As far as weed cutting, the
Council is waiting for the Road Committee to study the problem and come up with
some information on a weed-cutting policy.
Rum River Forest Preliminary Plat
Motion by Lachinski, seconded by McClure, that the City Council continue the
Preliminary Plat of Rum River Forest to the next regularly scheduled Council
Meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - October 17, 1978
Page 2
Junkyard License for International Tire Recycling Corporation
Motion by Lachinski, seconded by McC1ur~ to issue a junkyard license to International
Tire Recycling Corporation contingent upon the owner meeting all requirements
of Ordinance 9. Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution Appointing Election Judges
Motion by Lachinski, seconded by McClure, appointing judges for the General
and City Election to be held on November 7, 1978 in the City of Andover . . .
(See Resolution No. Rll6-B). Motion carried unanimously.
Volunteer Fire Department
Councilman McClure, Chairman of the Building Committee, indicated that the plans
for the new building were given to the Building Official today. The plans will
go to T.K.D.A. for review next. Engineer Davidson said the plans will be reviewed
by West1y Hendrickson and the architectural section of T.K.D.A. to see that they
are biddable or to point out any items of conCern. Discussed setting up a meeting
for October 24, 1978 contingent on getting response from T.K.D.A., and memos
from the Building Official and the Building Committee.
Chief Evans said that the Andover Volunteer Fire Department is now out of service
because of the weather. They won't be back in service until a month after the
new building is complete so they can get everything in shape. He mentioned that
the Fire Department would like to get some notification of City meetings, particularly
where meetings are scheduled within a few days. Also, from time to time in
talking to the City Clerk there are certain legal requirements and policies of
the City as to how the City does business - makes purchases. It is difficult
knowing what to do for each process. Chief Evans asked to get something in writing
so that all departments operate under the same policy.. Discussed the fee to
charge for plans and specifications of the new building.
Motion by McClure, seconded by Lachinski, that the Council authorize the City
Clerk to make a charge of $50 for plans and specifications of the new fire building;
this charge going to the prospective bidders and upon return of the plans and
specifications after bidding, a refund of 90% be returned to the bidding group.
Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Lachinski, seconded by McClure, to refer the matter of development of
an expenditure policy for purchasing of all items relative to the bidding and
taking in of formal quotes to the Finance Committee. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by McClure, seconded by Lachinski, that the Council hold a Special Meeting
October 24, 1978 at City Hall at 7:30 for the purpose of authorizing the advertisement
of bids for the new fire barn. Motion carried unanimously.
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - October 17, 1978
Page 3
Public Works Conference
Ray Sowada has requested authorization to attend the conference on November
16th and 17th. John Davidson, one of the speakers at the conference, briefly
explained some of the programs and who is involved. He highly recommended it.
Motion by Lachinski, seconded by McClure, to authorize the Senior Public Works
Person to attend the Minnesota Public Works Winter Conference at the Sheraton
Inn - Northwest in Minneapolis on November 16 and 17, 1978. Motion carried
unanimously. It was mentioned that hopefully use of the City vehicle to attend
the conference will be considered.
Wobegon Woods Preliminary Plat
Chairman Retzlaff explained the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation.
It was mentioned that there doesn't appear to be a problem with some of the lots
according to the Planning and Zoning motion that needed a variance. The Park and
Recreation Commission has reviewed the plat and requested cash in lieu of land
for park dedication purposes. (Mayor Windschit1 arrived at 8:27 P.M.) Concern
was expressed over: the great number of variances requested; only one access
into the plat; not allowing for possible future extension of streets; the possibility
of connecting this plat with the already existing Heather Street and 173rd Lane
and 174th Avenue. Dean Lutterman, developer of the property, explained the
street coming in, 174th Lane, was placed as shown because of the topography.
Also that he didn't feel the people on Heather Street, etc., would want all
the additional traffic.
Motion by Lachinski, seconded by McClure, to refer the Preliminary Plat of Wobegon
Woods to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further consideration. Motion
carried unanimously.
James Conroy Rezoning
This item is continued from the last Council Meeting. Greg duMonceaux, Mr.
Conroy's planner, explained that they had contacted the Anoka County Highway
Department regarding the Council's concern with the safety and/or improvement
of County Road No. 18. A letter has been received from Paul Ruud, County Engineer,
relating to their plans. The East side of Crosstown has had a paved shoulder
constructed within the last week but Mr. Ruud's letter says nothing about the
West side. Councilman Lachinski mentioned that the City could use a medium-sized
store and didn't think we are going to have too much business in the City.
The businesses are going to be going where the need exists. Councilman McClure
said that there would be 2 shopping facilities in 2 blocks. Mr. duMonceaux
said that this facility would be different from the convenience store with gas
pumps that will be going in at Crosstown and Bunker. Councilman Ortte1 said
that it appears to be harder to get a conventional type of establishment in
Andover than a junkyard started. Mr. Conroy said that he would like to get the
dirt moved yet this fall if it is rezoned. Discussed having to have a 4/5ths
vote on this issue.
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - October 17, 1978
Page 4
Discussed the great number of recent commercial rezonings proposed and/or some
development started: the "Speedy Market" at Crosstown and Bunker; the proposed
rezoning at Bunker and Round Lake Boulevard in Andover; the City of Anoka's
rezoning of the SW corner of the Bunker and Round Lake Boulevard intersection;
the rezoning by the City of Coon Rapids of the property at Highway 10 and Round
Lake Boulevard and Main Street; all the recent development at the intersection of
242 and Highway 65. It was mentioned that this proposed shopping would be in
the middle of a residential district. Mr. Conroy said that if this goes, there
will be an engineer hired to do it and he lives next door and doesn't want a
bar or anything like that to go in there. Discussed other Cities that don't
have a "downtown". A rezoning proposed on Round Lake Boulevard at l44th several
years ago was very much opposed by the neighbors but this rezoning proposal
has had no opposition expressed by the public. Mr. Conroy mentioned, in discussion
of improvement of County Road 18, that if they, the County, put in a beautiful
road then it will have to be torn up when he puts in the sewer because there are
no stubs for his proposed development. Councilman McClure had a problem with
1) the safety aspect of the project regarding County Road 18 but it looks like
maybe that will be resolved and 2) the Comprehensive Development says that it
is desirable to keep a distance between neighborhood centers, namely 1 center
per square mile. Wes Mand, Chairman of the Park and Recreation Commission,
stated that he would take issue with a Plan that splits businesses a mile apart.
It would generate business by being close together. Engineer Davidson explained
that the County Highway Engineer is working under a "warrant" system for improving
County Roads. He felt that perhaps Mr. Ruud would be willing to commit County
funds commensurate with the construction of the shopping center. Councilman
McClure reiterated his problem with the Comprehensive Plan.
Discussed having the City's planning firm look into the matter from the City's
standpoint. Even though the entire Council was not in favor of Mr. Conroy having
to spend money for this study, it was felt that perhaps this will resolve the
problem areas. Motion by Orttel, seconded by Lachinski, to refer the matter of
the reasonableness of the 1 square mile restriction in the Comprehensive Development
Plan to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Discussed amendinglor having a
statement from the Council regarding the Comprehensive Plan regarding the 1
square mile statement. (No vote taken on motion) Motion by Orttel that the traffic
safety hazards of the Neighborhood Business (at the legal description attached)
be addressed by the City's planner. Motion dies for lack of second.
Motion by Lachinski, seconded by Windschitl, to engage the services of a planner
to provide an impact analysis of the James Conroy NB rezoning on the City relative
to the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general
welfare of occupants of surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land, and the
effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area, and the
effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan and report back to the Council.
Motion carried unanimously. The City Clerk was asked to contact Midwest Planning.
Mayor Windschitl will talk to Paul Ruud about the West side of Crosstown Boulevard.
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - October 17, 1978
Page 5
Clean Air Act - Representative
Marge Christensen, re"presenting the Metro Clean Air Committee, explained that
their role is to assist in the development of clean air plans and they are working
with the PCA. She said that communities, such as Andover, will be involved with
forming the "State Implementation Plan" which will go to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency for approval. She told of the deadlines for implementing the
plan. In Minnesota, the 7-county metro area has a problem with 4 of the five
major pollutants. In this area the Prevention of Significant Deterioration
guidelines must be followed. They will be performing vehicle inspections in
the central cities during the day. They are attempting to get public input and
to have a representative from each of the 50 communities in the 7-county metro
area to aid in compiling the plan. She is at this meeting to inform Andover
of what is happening with the plan, for answering questions on the vehicle check
and also to inform the Council of an upcoming conference or workshop. They
would like one member of the Council as a liaison to receive materials and also
to come to an all-day meeting the 2nd week in January. Councilman Lachinski
will be the Clean Air representative from the City of Andover.
Break - 10:06 - 10:21 P.M.
Road Location - Robert DeGardner
Ben Bialke, 720 - 88th Avenue NE, Blaine, was present to represent Mr. DeGardner.
The Council previously reviewed the plan on September 5, 1978 and referred it to
the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Commission reviewed the proposal and it
was suggested that the Council approve the road location and also that it be
referred to the County Highway Department for their comments. A letter was
received from the Anoka County Highway Department dated October 13, 1978 relative
to the subdivision stating that the entrance onto Crosstown was acceptable,
aCcess to the lots adjacent to Crosstown should be on the interior street, there
should be additional right-of-way for the County road on parcels A and D and
they mentioned a minimum landing area 50' long with a .5% grade at the connection
to Crosstown Boulevard.
Motion by Orttel, seconded by McClure, that the road location for the North
~ of the Northeast t of Section 12 and the Southwest t of the Southeast t of
Section I, Township 32, Range 24 be approved subject to the conditions contained
in the letter from the Anoka County Highway Department dated October 13, 1978
and subject to the conditions contained in the T.K.D.A. letter dated September
20, 1978 and also that the revised layout be reviewed and approved by the Andover
City Engineer.
Discussion: Councilman Lachinski said that he would be voting "no" on this motion.
It appears that the lots are coming in at all sorts of angles just so they can
get a couple of feet on the road; there doesn't appear to be a logic to the lots;
the road appears to meander around and he felt it would be hard to get a good
future subdivision out of this area.
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - October 17, 1978
Page 6
Councilman Orttel said that this is not a plat. It is a 5-acre development which
is unplatted, which the Ordinance allows and that was my reason for making the
motion. If the City is going to encourage larger lot sizes, it may wind up with
lots that aren't in a geometric pattern. We would have twice as many homes if
it was platted to 2~-acre lot sizes. Councilman Lachinski commented that he would
rather see the land used more efficiently than to go with 5-acre lots with problems.
Councilman Orttel mentioned that if any of these parcels would be subdivided
they would have to give park dedication. This part of the City is in the Rural
area where there will not be sewer service. The Council is not approving the
lots, they are looking at the road location. The Mayor asked why the unusual
road, why the reserve area, and why the cruve in the road. Engineer Davidson
explained that this is largely wetland. In order to make buildable lots a number
of the lots will have to be filled to provide 39,000 square feet of contiguous
land above the flood stage. Approval of the road is not approval of a building
site. The reserve area is wet land and it is questionable whether a road ever
would or could be extended into it. The odd configuration of the street is mostly
due to the topography. The Mayor thought the Staff would have a difficult time
with this. People would be buying these lots to build on and then asking for
variances.
Discussed a previous action regarding proposed metes and bounds subdivision where
the Council gave approval on a road location. It was mentioned that if the Council
is going to be approving the subdividing of property in the City, it should be
done in a logical or orderly manner and should be reasonable for future resubdivisions.
Mr. Bialke said they had talked to the owners of the property to the North but
they were not willing to develop their land now. Councilman Lachinski said
that if there was no possible future use of this land for residential purposes,
he would probably be for it; but he thinks this land to the North could be worked
into this to extend the road and maybe plat the property. Discussed having one
access, about 3,000 feet long, into the property which would perhaps result in
problems for emergency vehicles, maintenance equipment, etc. Most of the area
is swamp or unbuildable land so it couldn't be platted.
Vote on motion: yes - Orttel; no - Windschitl, McClure, Lachinski. Motion fails.
Mayor Windschitl asked if the Council wants the developer to plat the property.
Councilman Orttel said that they can't plat it because of the topography - a lot
of water, marsh, swamp and one access off from County Road 18. Mayor Windschitl's
reasons for voting ''no'' were: the configuration of the road is nothing but
problems because there are 1 or 2 lots that are problems with frontage, etc.
It is creating unbuildable lots and-is creating a problem from a maintenance
standpoint in that we have a single access into a development. Councilman Lachinski
agreed and added that the length of that access/cul-de-sac is far beyond what
should be approved. Mayor Windschitl suggested that Mr. De Gardner and Mr. Bialke
talk to the people to the North and get some comments from them.
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - October 17, 1978
Page 7
Road Committee - Sealcoating
Ray Sowada, Senior Public Works Person, had some figures on blacktop versus
Class 5 roads. They are based on 1 mile of road. About 20 years is the life
of a blacktop road. In the first 2 or 3 years it should be sealcoated and after
that it may vary from 5 to 7 years, depending on the wear. Therefore a mile of
road in 20 years would have to be sealcoated about 4 times at a cost of about
$28,000. Class 5 would cost $14,500 to get the original road laid and after that
you have to add about 2" every 4 years to build the road up and that would come
to about $28,000 also. The Class 5 is about $2.60 per ton now. If the City
has their own crew and equipment, it would save about $8,000 in laying Class 5.
A sweeper would cost about $47,000 and the life span is about 10 years and it is
only used about 6 - 8 months a year. A grader would cost about $80,000 for a
life span of about 20 years, there is less maintenance and it would be used
more often. Dust coating for the Class 5 would cost about $1,000. He didn't
figure patching, hole filling, repair or maintenance. If the City hires contractors
to do the work, it will be pretty much the same for Class 5 as for blacktop.
For bonding purposes the life of a blacktop road is considered to be 10 years.
The Mayor asked if a motion could be passed saying from this day forward all roads
shall be blacktopped. Attorney Hawkins said that the City can change the standards
by resolution, as long as the developers don't have any money invested in that
typeœ roadway surface they would have to comply. Engineer Davidson stated that
the biggest single cost factor is ''wages''. Councilman Orttel said that if we
look at our budget today, it is going to cost $28,000 to do just Red Oaks and
Northwoods sealcoating. That is more than we are going to spend on all the gravel
roads in the City. He would like to see the comparison mileage wise. Take the
miles of gravel roads and what we spend on them and then take the miles of asphalt
streets and what we spend or should spend on them. Councilman Lachinski mentioned
that one thing is that with blacktop streets the City is committed to keeping
them in shape. In the first few years, unless the sealcoating is included in
with the cost to the developer, the City is going to be paying out so much they
won't be putting one penney on gravel roads. Mayor Windschitl asked if in the
development contract sealcoating could be included. Attorney Hawkins thought
the City would have a hard time with that. Once the road is brought up to City
standards, that is when the City is obligated to take the road over and any
future maintenance is supposed to be done by the City. Councilman Orttel said
that the City will be forced to sealcoat to protect the investment. We have set
the levy for next year showing no increase. If we are going to require blacktop,
we should probably figure 3 mills for that. Already we don't have money for
next year's sealcoating that has to be done. Are we going to raise the levy for
everybody in the City to pay for sealcoating and let the gravel roads go? We have
to know what the real cost is going to be before we approve this. Councilman
Lachinski said let's get the blacktop road mileage, anticipated blacktop for
next year and how the adoption of this policy would affect the budget.
Motion by Mayor Windschitl that we adopt a standard for the Rural section that
would require 24' of blacktop surfacing for all newly constructed roads after
today's date. Motion dies for lack of second. Ray Sawada was asked to get
more information.
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - October 17, 1978
Page 8
Ordinance 8 and Ordinance 10 Amendments
The Planning and Zoning Connnission reconunended approval of amendments to the
zoning ordinance and to the subdividing ordinance.
Motion by Orttel, seconded by Lachinski, for adoption of Ordinance No. 8C,
an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 8, Ordinance 8A and Ordinance 8B, an Ordinance
for the Zoning of the City of Andover. Motion carried unanimously.
The Council discussed the proposed Ordinance lOCo Section 9 Subsection 9.03
shows 66' of right-af-way for Mînor Streets. 8' is needed for snOw storage.
The Met Council is looking at streets 50' or less. 8' is also sufficient to have
sidewalks. Most Cities are using 60'. The Council left out the suggested amendment
to Section 9.06 which would have changed the requirement from 50' to 66' and asked
that the Engineer look at it and update the section. Discussed Section 11 that
was added by the City Clerk regarding filing of a Final Plat.
Motion by Lachinski, seconded by Orttel, for adoption of Ordinance 10C, as written,
with the following exceptions: Section 9 Subsection 9.03 be eliminated; Section
9 Subsection 9.06 Lots a (1) should be Municipal Sanitary Sewer Areas instead
of Sanitary Sewer Areas; also the elimination of any connnents relative to Section
ll. Motion carried unanimously.
Personnel Connnittee - Fire Department
Mayor Windschitl referred to the proposed Policy for Employees Membership in the
Volunteer Fire Department. This item was continued from the Council Meeting of
Oc tober 10, 1978. The Council had asked the Attorney for an opinion on items
1 and 4. Attorney Hawkins didn't see that there is anything wrong with #1 - it
is how the Council applies the provision that could possibly be a problem. There
is no problem with occupational related discrimination. Discussed various hypothetical
examples of hiring staff. Discussed #4 that states I~mployees should be allowed
one paid day (8 hours) per year for special training". This was previously discussed as
to allowing all employees getting one day off to get public safety/CPR training.
Motion by Lachinski, seconded by Orttel, to direct the City Clerk to prepare a
Resolution (See Resolution No. Rl17-8) on the policy relating to Volunteer Firemen
and consideration at time of employment as amended by the Council. Motion carried
unanimously.
Sewer Repair Responsibility - Kaess
Attorney Hawkins related that the Building Inspector is not responsible for a
contractor's failure to comply with the Code. He would indicate to this fellow
that the City provides the inspection as a service to the public but is not responsible.
Any action should be directed to the contractor who installed the septic system.
Attorney Hawkins will write a letter to Mr. Kaess.
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - October 17, 1978
Page 9
C.A.B. Interceptor
Mayor Windschitl explained that the C.A.B. has been planned all along with a wye.
It was planned, up until a short time ago, with routing up through Greenhaven,
one going out to take care of Anoka and one going off to cover part of Anoka and
tœncross the Rum River. They have already gotten the easement at the State
Hospital property. Then it was going to pick up the $300,000 pipe that is already
in the ground in Andover. Ramsey was going to get one dog leg off of it. Somehow ,
now they are apparently taking out the leg from County Road 47 to the East.
They are talking about removing it and if they do, we obviously aren't going to
get any capacity across the Rum. The City of Anoka is saying if they can get this
built, it could stop at the Rum right now but they would let Andover come through
their internal system. They have capacity in their internal system and they feel
that they can serve the other areas. They would leave us in and sometime in the
future this can come across the Rum and pick up the interceptor if we grew to
the North. The easement is there so it would be a matter of punching across the
Rum and tying it in. It would be to Anoka's advantage that this piece be built.
Basically what the City of Anoka wants Andover to do is to go on record of supporting
this being built and really almost to retract some statements apparently we have
made to the sewer board. The Mayor didn't know how it was presented to the sewer
board but we have almost, in effect, taken the position that we can handle everything
through the Coon Rapids interceptor. This is mechanically correct, however, from
a cost standpoint it is not a good idea because we have to build 1 or 2 lift
stations at Round Lake in order to get it to Coon Rapids. Anoka has a force main
right now and they apparently have got a fair amount of capacity that they could
turn over to us.
Engineer Davidson said that this would be considered an interceptor and be part
of the overall service area charge. It is a 30" pipe. This has been studied
by C.E.D., Orr Schelein Mayeron and, most recently, by Short Elliott Hendrickson
and in all cases we have gone on record saying we support the Anoka interceptor -
that we need it. He referred to a letter dated April 6, 1978 from Dewey Kasma.
The leaving out of that segment really is going back on their plans. It is a
political type of thing.
Motion by Orttel, seconded by Lachinski, that the Clerk be directed to prepare
a Resolution (See Resolution No. Rl18-8) outlining the concern of the City over
the proposed modification of the C.A.B. interceptor as it relates to the City
of Andover. Motion carried unanimously.
Assessor's Meetin~
Mayor Windschitl said he needed someone to attend an annual, all day meeting
regarding assessing laws on Thursday, October 19th at 9:00 at the Anoka Court
House. Councilman Orttel will attend.
November Regular Meeting - Reschedule
Motion by Lachinski, seconded by McClure, to change the first regularly scheduled
meeting in November from November 7th to November 9th. Motion carried unanimously.
Regular City Council Meeting
Minutes - October 17, 1978
Page 10
Resident Communication Committee
Motion by Lachinski, seconded by McClure, that the Council accept the resignation
of Charles Veiman on the Resident Communication Committee. Motion carried unanimously.
Regional Meeting
Motion by McClure, seconded by Orttel, that the Council authorize any members of
Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Clerk to attend the
Regional Meeting of the League of Minnesota Cities held at the Holiday Inn,
Brooklyn Center, on November 1, 1978 if they so desire to go. Motion carried
unanimously.
Ad iournment
Motion by McClure, seconded by Windschitl, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 12:34 A.M.
~f)/l;Þ~~~ -vl'r '{ h t{"
Deloris J. H so
Recording Secretary I !
vJ
l\i
~ ,~
','
_ .'}'
Cy~
---
GrRALD T. COYNE LOT SURVEYS CONIP^í\I~ RAYMOND A. PRASCH
j)() ERUNSWICK AVE. S. 6917 IDAHO AVE. N.
. GOLDEN VALLEY. MINN. BROOKLYN PARK. MI~;N.
MINN. REG. NO. <HI LA:-;O Sl1RVEYOHS MIIIN. REG. NO. bH]
HEGISTLRED l"SDER I.AWS OF STATF. OF MISI"ESOTA
INVOICE 110. ______
7601· 73rd Aye_ No. 560-3093 f. B. NO.
nmUSTRIAL - JUDICIAL Minf\f·.pot;s. Mi(1nf'~o1ð S5428 --
COMMERCIAL - TOPOGRAPHICAL SCALE I" ::
,~ l!Il'rttfiru t~
CITY LOTS - PLATTlI~G ~1trl1l'!Jur!1 0 - DEflOTES IRON
t
All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 33, To,;nship 3<:, 1
Range 24, Jl.noka','CoU!l ty. !:.ifll! esot.a, de:;crib,:d as follows:
CO:I1,.--:1enc iLl; at a poiIl t on the 3m¡th line of said ~ortheas~ 1/4
dL¡t;:;,r¡t 490.UQ feet /lest frc;n :.ne Southe:ist corr.er of said
I\or~heél.jt 1/1..; the:¡ce !~orth ilt ri,-;ht a:¡t:;les 1:-0 s3.id Sout.h 1 ÍlI e
a dist~lce of 6}0.00 f ~~et ; th(;!¡cc ,'lest :Hid p3!'illl ~l /lith the
Sou th line of sBid ~orthe33t 1/4 ¿¡ òi"t,:¡r¡ce of 151, .00 feet;
thence horth on a line òra·,.¡¡¡ at ri,€:ht :ill~;le3 :'0 the Soutn 1 in e
of said :~ orth ùw.st 1/4 a disê.:wce of )30J{) feet; thence South
cn "he 1 a:jt, ~('n t i 0:-. cd 1 i¡; e a J13tance of 207.00 feet; t~I(,,'1C e
~e~t arid p~r311el ~i~h the 30'.lth 1 i 11 e of ~aià !~or~...h8a.st 1/4
a distaflce of 311.20 feet; t..h~I.ce South on a lifle dra-",,'11 at
right a:¡~;les to the South liJie of said Northeast 1/4 a dist::H.c~
of 127. 80 feet; thcflc e he.~t a.l1d paralld "ith the South 1 ine
of 3aid !~or~heast 1/4 a dist.':i:.ce of 11O.C)O feet; then c e
,. ,t; .w' --1' d]'1 "t"" to';" r' 'ht 28 degrees 47 ~i~utes
nQr... .",c...~ve,,) e ....el.. """"·b ....He ...ti -
10 secoIlòJ 10r a èi~t21!ce of 2J;:'.9 feet; thEllce ¡;orth 44
deGree.:; .,' . 53 :~ecofids t:ast to its in~ersection ,;ith
./0 :!J'j,.Ilut.es
a 1 ule dr':""I parallel -.-Ii t.h and dist..ant llbO.OéJ feet North,
as measured at ri;;ht ar.g: es, fro:!: said S0uth 1 irle to the
actual poir.t of tef~inrJi¡;f; tt.er.ce r:3st parallel ',;ith said
South liJ.f~ 81.7.G,j fce~ to i:s :lJLérSp.ction with the East li:.e
of said Northeast 1/4 ; t~. "!uce hor:..h 1 de[rce 41 r:;inutes 50
secollds East along said Sa.3t line to a poi"t dist8.nt 1023.00
feet Southerly along said ¿rt~t line fro:n the liorthe.:ist corner
of saiè i,ortheast 1/4; thence liorth 88 de¡;rees 18 minutes 10
.seconds ·~.'est perpendicular to ~ajd East li.ne ISO.OO feet;
thence :~orth 71 degrees 52 min:..:.tes 10 secçr~d.s '/~'cst 411.88
feet to the cent~r line of COW¡ty Stat cAid Hi¡;hway 1;0. Ig;
thence ~)outh...est"rly along said Center lil<e to its iJltersect.ion
with a li/ie be3.ring ~;orth 45 de~~rees ~3 minut es 07 seconds
·,¡est. fror:l the actual rain t of begir.ui¡¡¡::,;; the,Lce 3cuth 45
de¡:rees 23 minutes 07 seconàs S:=i:..>t to the actual Faint of
bc,çinuiIlg. r;xcept the ~:as:' 271.12 feet, BS mcas-.lred at
ri,;h t aIlßles to the East. 1 ir;e tnereof.
.I. l1ereby cert;fy that this i, a true end correct repre1el'lfotio"
of . ..u,......y of tho boundari., of the abov. d.~c.rjbed lend end
fh. '~ation of an buildin9" ol'ld vi.ibl. encroachments.. if eny.
from 0' on laid land. Signed
Su"o)'ocl by UI t+,il_day of 19_ LOT SURVEYS COMPANY