Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOR May 18, 1978 . . ~ 01 ANDOVER BOARD OF REVIEW - !1A.Y 18, 1978 !mruTl"....s The Regular Board of Review for the City of Andover was called to order by Mayor Jerry Windschitl on May 18, 1978, 7:06 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crossto.m Boulevard NWf Anoka, Hinnesota. Council~ersons nresent: Lachinski, McClure, Orttel, Vanderlaan ~ouncilpersonÐ absent: None Also present: County Assessor, Ed Thurston; City Clerk, p. K. Lindquist; and residents Mayor Windschitl explained the City Assessor who actually did the work has since resigned, and the other City Assessor has become ill and is not able to attend this evening. If any rechecks need to be done, Mr. Dave Clough will do them. The following residents presented their cases: Dave Langseth, Plat 67513, Parcel 0090, 0030, :,0040, 0050, 0060, and 0160; and Plat 67512. Parcels 0010, 0020, 0030, 0040, 0050, 0060, 0070, 0080, 0110, 0120, 0130, 0140. and 0150 !11o. Langseth's main concern was~on the estimated market value on his o.m property, Plat 67513, Parcel 0008 with the house on it. He built all the homes in the area and this market value is in excess of 515,000 to $21,000 greater than the other houses with comparable square footage. It is new construction. In comparing this home with the one he had just sold, he felt they were comparable, yet the market value on this one is considerably more. His cost sheets for building the house is $39,000, excluding the lot. He noted that only 12 x 21¡ feet of the house is on a basement; the rest is on a slab. !~. Langseth agreed with the classification of the house. !~. Thurston stated the home is classified as a two-story on a basement; and he reviewed the records relative to square footage and classification. Mr. Thurston felt the problem is in the way that two-story portion is valued, and apparently all of that section is not two story. !~yor Windschitl stated that !1r. Clough will have to recheck the home to get exact information on the dimensions. !~. Langseth noted the other parcels are bare lots. The plat is recorded 80 that every other lot is a buildable lot, so he must sell two lots as a parcel. According to bis tax statement, the 1/2 acre lots are valued at the same assessed value. Mayor Windschitl noted the unbuildable Ones should be valued at bare land value. !~. Thurston noted in the 1977 assessments they were $3,000 per lot; in 1978 they were all lowered by $1,000. He wasn't Sure what happened but felt possibly an allowance was made on all lots rather than valuing buildable lots at $4,000 and un- buildable lots at 52,000. !1r. Thurston will check with the Clerk to find at if the plat specifies which lots are buildable and unbuildable, and he will find the acreage value for that particular land. Jim Fitznatrick, Plat 67809. Parcel 0850 !:r. Fitzpatrick felt his house is appraised at more than the r.¡arket value. He purchased it when it was ser.¡i-complete and the finish work (trir.¡ work and painting) is not yet done. He stated there is no blacktop driveway, nothing has been done on Board of Review Hay 18, 1978 - Hinutes Page 2 (Jim Fitzpatrick, Continued) a deck, and no yard work is done. Also, the market value is about 15 percent r.1.ore than what he paid for the house in July, 1977. The tax statement they received after purchasing the house was ~500 more than what they paid for it. Hr. Thurston stated the records show there is a blacktop driveway, which would add about ~250 to the valuation of the house. The 1978 value for this house was indexed 8 percent from the 1977 value, which is standard. The records also show the house as bein~ 100 percent complete on January 2, 1977; and 47 percent complete as of January, 1976. He also stated that in making the assessr.ï.ent, typically they don't consider yard work unless it is extensive landscaping. They deal with land values on an average basis. The question is the blacktop driveway and the percenta~e of co~pletion. I~yor ITindschitl stated ~. Clough will have to check the driveway and look at the percentage of completion on the house. Steven ',1!. Kuha. Plat 68111, Parcel 0600 r·~. Kuha was concerned about his estimated market value. He bought the property last September. The amount of blacktop is almost double on the books from what it actually is, and the records show the garage 50 square feet larger than it is. Hr. Thurston noted he had talked with I'~. Kuha previously, and apparently tbis problem bef,an several years ago. Somewhere 336 additional square feet was recorded, and this probably has been ~oing on for the third year now. I~. Kuha has requested a review on the property. I~. Thurston stated if they go back to the 1976 or 1977 assessment and revalue the property the way it probably should have been initially and straighten out the square footage, then once they make their recommendations, they would also bring it up to the 1978 assessment and correct the entire thing. It was determined that the County will make corrections if necessary after the County Abatement process is followed through. No action was taken by the City Council. D. R. Con,r:;er. Plat 6S926, Parcel 0610 and 6020 Hr. Conger stated his property, when purchåsed, was a 10-acre parcel and was then split into a second parcei for purposes of building a home on it. This acreage was in Green Acres at that time. He has hence found out they are no longer on Green Acres and assumed they had been since they were continually filling out federal ~overnment forms. They are in the business of raising livestock and want to know how to get back on Green Acres. He also wondered about the agricultural classifica- tion. ~s. Conger also noted all their farm buildings are on the 2;r-acre parcel; there fore, they are being taxed at a residential rate. And their farm bui~ing is valued at half the value of their house. ~~. Thurston stated Parcel 6010 is 7;r acres and is classified agricultural. Parcel 6020 is 2;r acres, contains the residence, barn, lean-to, and pole building, and is classified as residential. The parcels were divided in November, 1973. The forms filled out by the Congers are through the U, S. Department of Agriculture and the Green Acres Program is administered through the County. Green Acres ~ust be applied for every year and that deadline is Hay 1. Gayle Leone, Anoka County Assessor, explained the Green Acres has to be filed for every year by May 1. It is correctly classified at agricultural on the 7k acres and residential on the 2~ acres. If it had not beer divided, the County would arbitrarily split it for the~ taking one acre for residential and 9 acres agricultural. He stated the far~ buildings on the 2~~acre parcel could be split off since there is that much value involved in the farm buildin~s. On the residential parcel, they can set up the house and 1/2 acre on a residential class and the remaining two acres -- -- -- . _.~ --- Board of Review May 11\, 1978 ~ !Iinu tes Page 3 (D. R. Conger, Continued) on the ag classification. !~. Leone stated the County could make that change in classification themselves. The new construction on the farm building was valued On the 1977 assessment, and they would have to go through the County Abatement procedure if a correction is to be made. No action was taken by the City Council. Walter J. Vosika. Plat 65935. Parcel 2hOO and 3000 There are two 40-acre plarcels. The one was originally zoned light industry but was chan~ed to residential without his Y~owledge and the other is rural. I~. Vosika noted the parcel with the house and buildings hasn't gone up. He has made no im- provements to the house and has no easement to get to the one parcel. He reviewed the location of his parcels and the problems he is encountering rel~tive to trash bags from the dump next door, the lack of easement to the one parcel, and on the condition of the house and buildings. He also noted he had been refused a buildinß ~ermit to put up a pole barn because he had no easement to the parcel, and he ex- pressed concern about the rise in taxes every year. læ. Thurston reviewed the estimated market value of the parcels noting they are both classified agricultural in Green Acres and they are com~arable On taxable value. The classification of the þroperty hasnot changed because of the rezonin~. From what he could see, this land was valued the same as the rest of the land around the City. The outbuildings are showing 70 uercent depreciated structure value. It has apparently been the judgement of the past assessors that the lack of easement to the one parcel does not adversely affect the value of the parcel. }T. Thurston reviewed the tillable acreage in each parcel and explained that the reason for the difference in price between the two is because of the buildings and the 1/2-acre building site. lis. Lindquist stated I·~. Vosika should not have been refused a buildin~ perrnit for the pole building; and because it is ar,:ricultural land, no building pe~~it is :required as aGricultural buildings are not covered under our building code. No action was taken by the City Council. Joyce Boos, Plat h59l9. Parcel 1,650 }~. Boos felt her parcel should be reappraised. There were two houses on this þro-perty" She sold the older borne that she used to rent and moved it in June, 1977. That home is no lon~er on this parcel" !~, Thurston noted that the house was there on .1anua!'y 2, 1977; therefore, taxes will have to be paid on it for that year. According to the reoords, the house was still on the property as of January 2, 1978. If the house was moved off the property in June, 1977, in reviewing the figures, he noted there is about $16,900 in structure value that is no longer there. The structure value should then be reduced by 516,900. J1ayor ~indschitl stated that I·~. Clough will investigate the parcel. /.lOTIOn by Orttel, Seconded by IIcClure, that David Clough be appointed Assessor for the City of Andover until such time that a permanent replacement is appointed. Hotion carried unanimously" ¡!OTION by Lachinsld, Seconded by I!cClure, to direct the Clerk to provide the County Assessor with the information regarding the Dave Langseth property as to which parcels are buildable and nonbuildable. Discussion: !æ. Thurston felt since it is an assessment made by the local assessor, he should be making the necessary changes and the County would make the ~ Board of Revie¡'¡ Nay 18, 1978 - Ninutes Page 4 notation on the abstract. Mayor \7indschitl noted that what needs to be done is get a value on the lots and on the value of the home of ~~. Langseth to refer to the City Assessor for a report. Councilpersons McClure and Lachinski withdrew the Second and the Motion. ~mTrON by Orttel, Seconded by McClure, that the following items be referred to the City Assessor for a report at the June 6 Council meeting for ~~. Dave Langseth, the home and the Question of which lots are huildable and which are not on Plats 67513 and 67512; for Jim Fitzpatrick, Plat 67809, Parcel 0850, the question of percentage of completion of the home and the Question as to whether or not a blacktop driveway exists; and for Joyce Boos, Plat 115919, Parcel 4650, to verify the fact that a home has been removed from the pro1:Jert.v_ Motion carried unanimously_ ~!OTIO"l by Orttel, Seconded by MCClure, that the Board of Review be continued to June 6, 1978, at 8 o'clock at the City Hall. Hotion carried unanimously. Board of Review continued to June 6, 1978, 8 P.r.t. 9:06 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ,. ~----:> iJ,~,~ ú.·~kL--L Marcella A. Peach Recording Secretary - -- - -- .. . . ~ .- -