HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC September 20, 1977
CITY of ANDOVER
~~Q'J!...\~ CIT? sor:;---:::I!.. !~3_~~~r;3 - S:?T~~-~~:R 20 J 1977
:":I;:U':r:\s
The T!e.-:o;ular 3i-~Io"1thl:'l ::eeting nf the Andover City Council was called to order by !'layor
Jerry :'.rindschitl on Septer.1ber 20, 1977, 7:30 p,!O" at the A!ldover City Hall, 1685
~rosstoW!l 'Boulevard Tf,'[, Anaka, ~·Ti!lnesoté1.
C011ncil "DerSO:l.'] :present: Lo.c hins!:i J ~-:cClt1re, Orttel, VandorLaan
GouncilpaTsons absent: !'Tone
Also n::-Gsent: City Attorney, ','IllliC1:':1 G. :~Qwl·:inG; City :8~Gincer, ~~cx Stoclç,'!ell;
Plo..~!lir..~ ;:'~ ZoninG Gl1ai~r¡an, Larr~r TIetzlD.ff; City Clc~k. p. K.
Lindquist; and interested residents.
There waG no 8tate~cnt in the ~esident ~orUM section of the meetine.
Af\enda An0~::,~val
!~ay()r l'.'indGchi tl requestdd t:U3 addition of the rrayo-].::tn1:cy Lm7sui t and cXJ.llained tho. t
~e co~tacted t~e ~eGidonts in tho Cedar Crest area that would ~ave o.n i~terest in this
S11b5'?ct infort:.iTI.~ the"'1 't:1is ~7oúld be (1iSCUSGcd t~1Ís evcYlins.
~'r;7T(Y! 'hy 'l0..ndcrLaan, Seconded by ;~cGI:Jr8, t:la t the Agenda be approved \,7i ~h the deletion
of rte~ ~h, ~ll~ ~iver CrosGin~, and t1l0 addition of IteM 5~, Jlayo-Danl-:ey L'1\'Isui t. !1otion
carri.en 11.nanim01ls1y.
~Añ i'\ql:S 1>n~d Acontsitiol1 _ t;:)'n~o:,r
Att'Jrney ;:a\",1:ins reported t~at he ~1Ð.S received verbal acree::J.cnt \'lith TIT'. ':-;9!1i:veld and Hr.
?0th fr¡r the þ~lrchasinr.; of their laild for t~le }lroposed :pondinc sites in ~ed Co.~:s at ')500
an ac:-:--e pIns the rin;ht to re"'10ve t:18 blacI: dirt. ~<r. Ha',','kins ha.d not contacted the
-r;'lelanris '>7it~1 re~ard to the purc~lase of their la!ldj however, the Clerk stated she did
inforn they:1. that they '.'¡'Quld !lave t:!1e ri,~ht to retIove the òlac~: dirt fro:1 the property
as ~as òcc~ ~esotiatcd ~it~ all other acquisitions involved.
,Ta~es Cnnr0¡T. 2lf.,~7 1 :ycnh Aven'Je ,,";':.r _ a.s~:ed if any of the Council b.aù 1001::8d at tho l:::u:.d
he ~~d Dresented at tte last MeetinG that are sellins for ~150a an acre TIithin the City.
Conncil-çerson La'chin.::::l,:j. explained !1e had 100::ed at several and found that ~uch of the lay..d
\'las hir;h Ground D.nd felt that these ~'lOuld or could be buildable lots j therefore, that
land would be "!o~th More than the land the r;i ty :;Üans to þu~chase fror.¡ T:::''''. Conroy for the
nondinf': site. l~r. Conroy stated he to:) 1001:ed at the lots and felt r.:OGt of them \'/crG
bouGht fer nod fartls and, therefore, not buildable,
I
Discussi.on was on~,rr. CO::lroy's request to !1ove the line of the land the City is p.ropo.sinS
to DHY'chD.3C from ·'-r-. Conro7 50 feet to the south, as at the present ti!"1e he felt the line
-t_G too close to his buildings. ~-:r. Stockwell explained this could be done, but Vlould
require addition~l surveying costs and a new lesal description. ¡Ie esti~ated the cost
\'.rould 'be about ':~100. He also ex~lai!1ed t'r.at t~lis would decrease the :pondinG Gi te by about
op-e acre, and r0~Gibly this would have to be r,ained sOMe~here else. IT. Stockwell aereed
,
to c'-1.eck tnta th$ fir;~JrcG to see if th:::'s Qdditional Qc!'e would indGed have to be G'a.ined
,
()::' wh~t11er t:;e a~ea '.'muld 'be .sufficierr~. ','llthout it for tl:.e :pondin.s site. j,T. Hawkins
sta ted that If t~)e line v,'ere !1oved c.s l'r. Conroy roque3ts and T~r. Con!'oy 'would t~len agree
to the scttle~en~ of ~500 an acre, t~e ch3nce in the legal description of the area ITould
!lot be a ~ro'blc~la.s the condesnation F~oced~re would then be dropped.
. -. --
~egular Ci ty Cou~cil ;"eetinr:
Senteober 20, 1977 - 'Ii,lU tes
Page 2
(:Jed Oa1,:::; Pond Acql1isition - Conroy, Continued)
r~:r . ~onroy a~~ced if the City !".1oves the line back 50 feet and :Dé,Ys hie GpI)Y'aiser' s :ee, he
rro111d aCC(1)t the Gityts propos cd acquisition price of ~50a an acre. :-::e alGa aQ~cd to see
the an:Drai.sal fir,ures far !lis property. ~'~r . ~:a wkins stated it iG the City's le~al respon-
oi1Jility to "pay :12.3 a):::,raise:--'s fee, and he could arrance for ~':r. Conroy to Dcct ~ith
··~r . Allen to rl1..SCUSS the ap~rai8al of t:,a t laOld,
T':r-. T-Ta,,·¡1::i..n:> aIr),') eX:Jlained. t1:'B a~rec:'~cnt he has d:rD.wn up \'li th othel~ p:roperty owners
:r8r:a:rdinr.; the hlacl: dirt ri~hts. The D.cree:1ent '9rovides t;'lcy will have the r:Lsht to
Y'e~'1ove the blac~: dirt fro~ toe area t~e City acquired under tIle Gu~ervision of the City
~!1o:;ineC!r , o!" in the event they do not chooee to take it out prior t,;. '.'¡:hen the City needs
to excavate as "art of a~ increased stor~ sewer syste~, when dredginG it out toe Ci t;y v,'ill
T''.lt . . 0~ tbe~r pronerty adjacent to the ponding cite.
lc
r-r0THV7 'hy VD.nderLo.é1Yl, Seconded by Orttel, th:tt the City Coun;:;il .:1uthol'ize ':'E:D.A to request
Lot Surveys t8 ~re~a~e a n9~ les~l dcscriþtion for the ponding area ta be acqui~ed fror.1
t.Ta~e0 Conroy, tl:at le,c:;al re~re.sentin~ addi tiono.l 50 feet of proporty al1o~ed south~ard
frat! the Co~roy ho~e3tead property. In Y'eturn, Y·::'"'. CO::1roy ar,ree."J to a lurcha::::;e ,rice
of "tS()() ner acre and is allo\':ed to retain the black dirt rights subject to the Attorney's
ar';ree~e!lt ao drafted betv:een ,Tar.19S Conroy 3.nd the City, (See ?esolution ?111-7)
~rl)tion carried unanitlOUG1y.
T.:G.sement ,o.cql1isit:tcms - Pr-a~r~e noad
I '11,100
A ttorncy ~I,:n':kin$ requ0~ted an additi~~al co~pen::::;ation of to be pa.id to I,T. and
,
:·:i's. Joha.nGor" as durine the construction of Prairie ,:oad an additional 19 pint-s, one 48-
inch cedar, and¡ one cott::>n~ood tree r:ere ror:lOved from this residential lot. '":'1.1e City
ì-:ad "'JreviouDly raid '~65n for the eascment of their land, includinG the re:?!oval llf one o.3.~:,
t'.vo nine trees, and a clur1-:) of lilac Gushes _ ':'~1iG cOMpensation is for the o.ddi r~:: anal
trees ~e~ovcd d~rinG construction.
:'0TIn-:T 1)y 1lan1e~Laan ,'3econd.ecl by :'·~cc.:l1J.rc, that the ~i ty ::::o"\.l!lcil authorize an addi tio!l.:ll
~n,l()() for easement acquisitio!l for t:~c rTairie r.oad :-'roject for Parcel r'Tu~ber 13,
,
oV/TIcrs, Leslie .:1n1 IIen.:-y ,Johanso!l. (See T'csolution ::112-7) !Totion carried ur..anir::ously.
''''inslm'l '1olase,:J ll'iQ Andove" 'JoulevQ"d 'T.'; - stated he has observed a couple actiens
toni~ht aOld t~at because a tree sits in front of so~cbody's house aOld soades it, it
"'.as so~e valnG; but ','¡hen it nrotecto a field fror:1 blowing D..\'ic:.y for aG~iculture purp:Jses,
it "has no val'~le_ Also, there was quite a bit of neeotiation done here rlith other parties, ::u:d
he felt there ~as none in his case.
T'inal Plat - ~)<.1.Jnes T)ollin.~ :;o.1:s Second Addi.tion
I
7;1_ye B!1!'nes - e:~~laìned that everythi::1g ho.s been completed except for GO!ê.C very r.tinor
-p01.nts reqneste1 by the =:nr;i~eer. ~~e intends to blacktop the rO.'1d, '..'hich is not required.
:~:'. T;aw'dns .sta.t:ed the title opinion ~'l21S sati.s~actory_
""MIn', by n"ttell, SecoOlded by LachinsJ:i, t:,at the Gity Council Qccept the l'inal PIQt of
"=!arn.e::> ::-'ollin~ ra1:.s Second Addition and authorize the Clerk and I!a.yor to execute the S.:l¡::.e.
(5ee "':e801'..l tion ~113-7) !~rJtion ctJ.r:,icd ur..ani:'1ously.
T')e~nlar ~ity CQuncil !~eeting
Se~tembe~ 20, 1977 - Iftnutes
ra'!8 3
Tllp-'!'al Talenhone rateh - TTatfiel
~he Clerk nresonted the Council with a lettc~ froM Cene ~ratfiel d3ted Septembe:- 20
exnlainin.r; a o.T~T COU1')lc~ could bso installed for which there ,'¡ould 1JC L1 r.lOnthly charGe..
~'''8. Lindollist :::tatcd '\','8 have received not~lÜlf, from the telephone COr.1pany that thio ·..:ill
wor~ or that they ~ill ~e-in8tall it..
Shi_~ley T!atfiel _ stated t~c telephone co~pany tal:cG care of part of the inotallation of
the couplc!', and !t'. !i,'":tficl 'aould install the half that needs to 1"';0 on the patch. lIs.
Lindquist cx~lained that t~e ~2~ raid to the telephone COMpany ¿e~ for the removal of t~c
equipf'1ent. It }:<1':; been rcfer:-ed to both 0.3 a fine and Ð.G a service c?1o.r'[':c by the telephone
cO"'17]any. ~-1I'. T:,:n:::i!J.G ax:-Üaincd tlw.t if this is work that has not been done properly J
the City has a ric'ht to GO to conciliation cO'.lrtJ ~':hich ,,/QuId cost ~?5a for a filinG
fee and could be ~la:!1dlcd entirely b:r -tho .stD.f:;:"'. The statuto of Lir.:itationG on a contract
, ,
:LG r) yea:-::::.
7"-()~Ir:~T by V1ch:ln:::;>;::LJ that r:e direct t~lC (;ity Clerk to .senri this lette:'.."" 'pIu.:: a letter of
eX:JlanD.tion to t?10 telcjlhr:J::1e CO"'1.]C1.:17 a[;:d~c for ve~ification of tIle GtatC!:1CYlt ~ad3 'by iT.
lieTI9 ~Tatf~_cl 0;:10 ",'ay ar the ath'):~. :-rotion dies fa:?:" lQc~: of secor..d.
~~r:""'T(m by :,:c8htrGJ Seconded by '1Io.r.dcrIja.o..YlJ that tl:_e 80nncj 1 0i~"Jr;t the City Sté1ff to :::;e8]:
c r]"'i"::'cnca tioYl 8] '::ay of Conc:i11.:1 tio!1 r:::O~I::,t fro!''! Gus to!"! ':::lcc tro~1Ìc SY3teT'13 J Ine. J
c~~ce::'nin5 t~e di3p~te of "illo~al'f tale?~one patch.
A1fr;-;~:D~,~'TT r"1n :';n~T(ì~': by VanderlaanJ Seconded by HcClure, that the City CIerI: 'Jc directed
to further ner;-otiate with Gene Patfiel and :-Torth';:estern Jell in an atte::1?t to resolve the
~rohle~ of tho t01e~~one patcl1 and ttat ~it~in after 5 days a[ree~ent cannot be reached
t¡~at t~e cnl1cil:intion r;:':"''Jceedin,ss be i!:it~.'l.tcd.
1
~.rrì':'-;: rr!' ll'?~r::r:--::~T~: C:1.!'7'ied 'JnÐ.ni~:lo'T'31y.
~r:'T'T:" """'f ""r,M:-r;,r. I r<~''''r'c'' "n....'>'-¡>·~,"'1¡"lv
, , . -- " I ~,,- ~, .. 0._,_" 0 "
A:080Ci.é1 -:1 'Î!1 nf :·ü::'t'o;)()li tan 1':'Jni.c:i·'~D.l~_ t~0;;
:'r. lfern !'ûtc:'GO~ "lith t~;,e A:Jsnc':"L1.tion 0: ì:0tro'lDli-:an r:urÜci'lal':"-:ios ::n.l1Y::::lied the
(' 'I "'1,,1 t ' "1 1·'; t' - _!"J'~- . t'
..ounCl ~'Jl¡::;!1 l,-,~ré1 lirc anu ~rcCcn;",cc.. a S_~_QO Sll()';r on !1C 7i'J.r')OS8 ')..:. ~llC or,so.n:"ZQ 2.8::1J
t!.'" ...... .......; ......~.1. I"'....... ......,....,...... ... n....,. . ....., ':.1.~,... ,~,.., ~~..... ~,...,-o ro· ~ ,ro...." ,~,.--.__ ..t..
'.~ .,(LV-,-CO"", _l'" 'P~-,-J.C_c,_~') lor ,.llnJ.Cl.:,Cl.l.,_...,-c,-" anI ,-,0.._0 OJ. t.:1~ ~...-)"-,o,-,l.:tt..:...an.,:¡ '--,'-'cc!':1.tll........uen'-'s.
~Dllo','~n". t!lp ~-~pe~t-t..;n~ ~~r DA+e"",]'] ~n~··rc-n~ q"n,...t'o-" of ':~,l";Vl'~'l~l ~OU-cl'1-e~~0~"--'
..--'- _, ,,_._ .~.cì > , u. -'--"l~J .- . - ~v .......,." CA......... 1. ~'-<. ""~"--' - .1'-' -,-1~'-<...:... .........u. ./ .1 -1' _'-'J.~"".
To~-...-;ir;,nte r8ceS$ at ,'3:3.'5.
.. , I,
.·.a'lr)-'lan·~0·:.r I~f1':.r::-;l1l-:
'ttr)-~,",Y ~!'''''1·¡'-~n-I~~'T''' ~"'T'C 1-<-c1-,.......""lnr1 ..;nfor·'-tl'-" 0..... .L}...... 1···¡""I-. .. ~rd O'''Jhl'-eC' t'1"
~i ~J. ."~ .'-"-. ~_ ~ ,_.,<..1., ~ ...;,u_.. ;.,In j,~,-'_ ",,,.'---'- n _ ;....... J~. " .....'" C-<. -'>-A. '-' u..~~ "'.i.-<".' ~-' ~ 1 ~
settlement cti~:113ti~ns nc~otiQtcd ryith ~~. !~yo and his attor~cy. ;~. ~!av~ins explained
, -
the dÐvelop~ent oncn~~Qs3cd a proro~cd 5 subdivisions in the no~t!~ern ~Cl.rt of the
......r"\t"1 l' "i . ..~r .,...,"', It'.. T' ~¡ '.,11 """''h",...J,'> r 1 ....."'...."" (" T 't"1d -r¡ ,'.~ 'T) ........,,10'1. ..,~.L' , . .....
'-'_...:1...:1._....1 ().. ../OJl ./ .OéL ,/J. ll~.... 1.1""'\,e_O~j~"-û ..:1J:O 0.._ __":L1,,C./ cc......._ In ...;..;",.'1 anc:. recelv~d
anþ~oval ~0r Q ~leli~i~ary plat in 1072 entitled t:lC Third Addition. The plat included
a!'eas of tl'!9 TI:::,o'l():;od "'ourth fl..ddi::io~ o.nd n~oT;')secl :::'ifth Additia~. ':L'Ì1C ':'hird Addition
~i~al '?lat '.'.'!l; !1~:;roved iil the ea!'ly po.~t ~f 197.3. At t!iat ti~:;3 th8 Tm·,rn :2oard ~ranted
<l!1 e:-::t~~s5.1)r;. o-t" ::;[ ;;~0nt:ls to f:_le t~1'8 Fir:al ~lat IJ~ the ~ourt!l Addition (the deo.dlinc boinr;
lJ~(:'1>:;1;e'!"', 1073), '1,·r~ich i.'3 t'f.tG s'lbiect ~nf this lCl.\'.'suit. :'.."!:e!1 the ":1hi~d Addition ';.rD.::>
I ,,- ~ -
'1nol1'1 ..,l-t+n~ .. ...'~e't""" 1""'''' l'n~"f~l'c'ont ..............1._ I-nd d",,~-Ica"ed to ~oe' t~o roq"--:I'^~ente "0
,-- .<., . . ,,- v' 'J I"'¡: "~",-,,---, --"A_.I. --'-.~ l-''-''-...c~ "" ",U_,-'" "'~ '" J."" '-" '-'-.1.. '-";.. '-'J '---'
t":-1p rl~vclo~er 1,'12,.8 S1ing to include t~~G r,ar',:: froM the Fourth Addition. Littlû trans:!)ired
:f'"r"()"1 t:l''!n until 107t; wb.cn t'he:'{ Ð.ßr::Ün as~:ed W:".2.t can be done tD finalize tl:e ?o'!lrth Additiorl..
"€g111ar City '::ounc:tl ::ec'!tin,?-,
Se~te~ber 20, 1977 - i:inutes
Pan:e 4
(r-::J.yo-'3an::cy Lm','8u:'Lt, '::ontinucd)
~:r. ~Iét1.'l~':~ns advi:::cd that bÐca~LSe the tir:;.e period had lapsod, t1-'.ey GÌ1o'.lld start through
th0 urocerture a~ai~. In July, 197G, the Council adopted the ~8~ato~iu~ Ordinance.
In A-1GUGt, 1976, ~e vere served ~ith a ~etition rcquirin~ us to approve the freliQi~ary
T'18.~ and QG~:in,": :for clar-mces Ct15(; ,(00) for failure to é3..þ!J!'ove it :ll1d d3.::1ß'e::; for utilizinc;
~.roposcd r.ar~·: lrtnd in the T.'ourth Addition alleßin,~ the City had dr,~dGcd out a pond on
land that ~l[1.d never been dedicated 2.:1 a :;lat. T:18 r:.attcr ha,'] norl COr:1e u:p for trial, but
we have ner;otiated a settle~er..t wit~ ~Ir. jíé1YO o..nd his attorney Gubjsct to the Cou-:1cil's
a1J~""'()val. ':'he follOì'!i.Y1G sti:-Julatj_ons ':.'ere discussed by :¡.:r-. !{3..'.'.'I:iY1.'J .:lY1d t!ie CO'.lTIcil:
L'rovis1.on 1: Plaintiffs 1,'Ii11 file t:1C saf1C :Üat that 1:IÐ.S "~Jreviousl.7 ::tp:p:,ovcd by the
Dlo.nninr: COT'1T'1issi'Jn and tr.o City COUYlcj_l. Since the i1oro.toJ:'iur.¡ tas been lifted, at this
tt-g the davelonor _.~ entitled to come in and plat un1er ~-2 reQuire~~nts.
~Y'cnri.8ion 2: ProviJles t~1~ PlaY1Y1ir..~ a?ld ZQnini~ COr:1miGsion will cond"!..tct a I'ù.1Jlic Eeari!1G'
a~corrlj_n"': to Ilur Ordinar.cp- 10.
Provj.sioY1s· 3 a~d 4: ~efer to Gtreet GTJccifications ::md dro..inaGe di3~oso.l system accordinG
t~ th~ ~ity's current Gt~r..~ard8.
fJrlJviGion:;: PlaintiffG Yd.ll -0:,:)vide tl:û City ¡'lith a oond or letter of c::'cdit accord=-nc
to Ordi~ance ~To. l~A, accordinG to the ter~s the City ~as Get today.
:"'r:Jv:tsion r;: City l,'rill c1~aft <1 develcpT:1Gnt contract D.~d eX<1tJi'18 -:itle to 10.1:.d -- a3 iû
done today ~ccordlnG to City .standards a~d Ordinances.
!'rovÜ:;:5_orr 7: ,Scttle~·_;cnt statcs tTDc:fcl1dD.nt. ':rill be responsible for t:-te fees ta file t:le
~l3.t.~..". Di3cu:~:;'cm ':,'::t3 that it :=>hcnld '80 t~1C flPlai:1tiff ì'l~ll b;. reDID nsible :.....tr fees...1I
1,----'-'. :-.:a'::~:l~3 ::ta<::cd t1-11G ",'as -;¡rob.:t;11y an error and ':.'culd VG:::'lfy tn::..s.
I
!"'roY1.Gion n: D3c1icatod l)ar:-::: land for ?ou:-th Addition ,",'ill be 4.5 Q.C!'C.G, l,'.'hich is 7 percent
of t!lC tot3.1 3.rc~, the requi::~'e!;!er..t of the Pla-:':'inß OrdinaYlce at t;'9 tir.1c it ','lD.S o"':'icinally
ulatted. Currently the City requires 10 percent ~a:,k dedicaticYl; ~oTIever, since th1
City '!:as ~O!:9 on 1T)D.r~': '0rODcrty in the Fou!'th Addition U:at ~ad not been dcdicD.ted to create
I' ,-
a .'9rmrJ ':.-h::'c:: 1,'.'9 1F.d no rir,:1t to do, it r.'.:1S ~.:r. H.:J.i·.rI:i~s' feGlinc t:1:1t in :Jcttle::1ent for
t~iG ~atter t~e ? ~crcent is a satisfactory ca~~ro~iGe cn beho.lf of t~G City. At the
I - - -
t~~e the ~tf~d A¿d~tion ~~:J ::tnDroved, ttere is no record of an ag~ee~ent callinG for a bond
, ~
nr an a~~ge~ent to ~uarante9 dedication of that the Plat vould be filed uithin a certain
n8~iad ~f t~_'"::c. ~.::;. LindC!u:'st c:-:~l3.j.:;.!;d t:r.:1t at the ti'~e tl1e ~hi:,d Addition ;'la3 approved,
tl:c nL'l.r<-:': dedicati/Y·1. coveri~r: t~e r::'hird Addition. ':r:1.S Lot ') of 31oc::. 1~, l,'f~lÌch is in Cedar
~~~st Fstates Addition and is no~ used as an .:1cceGS lot to the ~2r!:. She alGo stated that
t~e ~ity daen n.~t have a deed to that lot on file; t~ereforc,b ~ctuality it haG not been
dedi_cD. t0r1.
~rC'!vinion Q: Set;:> the 8c::.e,-1111e fo:, streets Ctnd d::....aina(;'e diG?:Jsal :::>yste¡;l, l,'¡hich includes
t>t~ reC'llired blad:top. ::~. T~a':¡,:::.i:1.:> e:x~laL1ed he is Going to be required to have the
ntreets rour;::.ed ih JY :·nvo:-:.ber 1, 197,']. :Ie rlOuld be able to get buildinG :pcr::1its o~ these
,
lots follo':lÌnr: .:1"';'::'Irova1 of t-:10 7ir..al :?lat D..nd the l"DoGtinr- of the bond, ~~:e bond \'rill
,~ ~ r - 'J--
.:,1tar3.~tec t:1at th~ iten3 i~ tÌ1:'s provisim: ~'till 1Je cQr!"ied out. If t~ley are not, the Cityb
recourse is D.C'o.j.!1ft the develope:-.s or tl:e b:Jr:dinC cor:par~y.
~r()Vi8:i.on 10: Should the ;:artie8 D.r.reo to t!1c terr:s, the entire CQGe '.':i11 be dis::-:issed.
, -
If t1:.e;;r crtnnot n:::fec, either '::trt~,'" T:t:1Y reque.st the trial. :.:1". Ha':I::inG felt this '\'laG a
!'eé1.Donab1c s~i Dula tion to end the la\':::::ui ~ and reco~::;.~ended o.pproval.
. I
;-~.'1.yor '.7ir!dsc~1itl :::tated tl1Îs Council ~1o.d not revie'.'fcd the plat at 0.11 .:1nd pointed out there
arc doublè.-fronto.,se lots Ü1 t1:.o ::;lat 1,'::lich are not allowable at all today. r·~. ~:D.w::inG
stated ¡'Ie are bound by ou!' predece.G.'Jor's act:"on a~d this has been reviewed three ti¡;18s
~revi01Jsly ';:it':1 t1'.o sz..r;¡e 0:rdi!:ance3 .st:"ll in effect. !Ie c0!":1::1cnted that the City would be
T?e~ular City Council ~:0eting
Se"Ote!!1ber 20, 1077 - Einutcs
Pa!';G 5
C'~ayo-'?an~:ey LO.·;.'Gui t, Continued)
haY'd--PY'ssscd to convince a court tho.t this is reasonable action <1.nd that :th~!l:;D h~ve
tro.....4.. - .-'lt1'Æ"-.r.
c1:an.'"';ed so è.!'o.:òtically s:Lnce 1973. ::.1.yo2'" ','IindGcÌ1itl otatod t~l.J.t aSGurIinc;..j,iB 1]_ od a G~:Gtch
'Plan toc1ay, there are a lot of thinf,s in that ?lat that ~ould not be acceptable under
thG ;,reSC::1t Planni~~ C8~~is8io~.
Dnn Ah11J13~~. l7r;3~ nlac1~f00t - :'31t tl:.c '.·...bole tenor of the ne~oti~tcd aGrce~ent rropooed
Gee~8 to '1)ro-G~:1pt t:1G a1tthori ty of the GO-:JDcil. It Ð..SSU!1GG tho result of the Puòlic Ecarine
to br: held by thB r ?~ Z, and t~o only possiblo course of actio" to avoid this thY'8at of
the 1a1,'!s1,1i t --UJ to accent r:ha t tr~ey ','.Iant. C':r. !Iaw)dns felt tr..o i~E;r13 neGotiated are a
reci.tation of our 0rd4_lì.·::I.nc'3 ac ,;:e ~1ave noy!. !:e felt there 'haG ùeen no fault on the :c"rt
of the 8ity 1n ~~oces3in~ t'lis )la -t ":i th the exception that we have ~'onc on p3.rl:: land ':¡hich
~~.:t8 r.0t ~cen de~icated and face pJ-tential liability for covertinc it to tho City's use.)
:'~r . A:l1b~,..Ç!' - Ð.81œd .i.f j.t is ~c3..'J::maàlc that Y:e should jeo:;ardizc a ~'¡'101e cO::l:nuni ty 1'.ri t::-J.
nlatti~r, and za~inG t::at r,rc don't ~ant in order to save ~155,Ooa \'to do!:' t Y~'10"! ':Ie aTC
r,oi.!1~ tD lose in ~c'J.rt. 0'2-'. :~a\','1:ins stated all va are dcJins ic te lli:'!.C thoJ:1 they can
co~e bac1:: and :;lat this nO~'l ~lnder the oxic tin:,; (Îrdinance~ '=':le o~ly t~i~G ve're concedinG
is t1e ?rovicion ITith rc~ard to the par~;::. )
T)lJal1C Falter. 17/~Gl ~lac~::foot - ~crdcr3 tìw par:: land - stated t}:orc ap)0~rG to oe a Croo..t
deal of consideration on the par!:, 1J'1t felt as a City t~grc i3 a lot narc £t Gta~e. ':lit:1
G"e::12!' 8rcst :;:::ta--:C8 hoi~G t11C second ì-:.i,?,:E:.::t concentration i~ t}~c City, .:tnl ~ith t~c ad¿i-
tton r)f t!--:c::;o l')O-SC:::c 10-:8, ,..",''''''''''' lo::)~:i::1G at a :¿otc~1tial problon relatinG tl ::;o',':cr :'.:t:"lurcs,
.I~ ~ '"
etc. Should :'1'.0 sitl1r'.tion è.eveloy ~,:1C~e a trU::1~: line 1'.'O!J.1'.:1 need -;;0 'bo run 11"') to thi::;
a:-ea, t~8: rCG::d:>nts in tho. t area 1'.'ou1d :;1ot ò:> ablc t:J éts::;ur.lQ th·~ o::1ti::-e coot ')f it, '::l-:ic~l
cauld then ~otDnti.Qlly coot the ~ity a r,rco.t doal of ~O::1cy. T:J.i.s o!:ould be tù.l:en into
consideration. (Co~~cil~8rGOn VQndorLo.an ctated that we have to de"l TIith the ~eGul"tions
t~lat are in cffe~t nov and the itc:'! t~at is diffe~einG f!'o~ tl1C present reculatio:;1c ..;..-:> the
,
nar'- 1<1:d. 3Ìl0 ar:ree¿ ':Iit!: ?::-~ ~:o..l ter' c ?!-,ilQGoj,~>?1y of :lavinc a lo..2:'Ge :;ioce of l=':''J?G:'ty
in t1-1C nort~1C!'n l1.~CG to ,,!'ovent ..t.',..,..t. t:œoat, the sc\'tc:::' lir:c::; CO~iD~ no;:-U:!; b~t 11:;1ro~tunate1y,
'" .'-~..
tte r:-di.~ancc~ 11~VO not be~::1 cì.:o.:1",,:cr1 tD reflect t~élt o.nd t~l'~ C::nn::::il ~w.:: bee~ ~:a:"'lè..:' -::o.lJlJcd
~¡::'("""1""ro l' t'l-,4'..,. i ..,.'~,...,,... -1. ....,,...,...f'O>r~ t::a.t t'1"'" lot .sizes D.r:.d t~lC >~l::'~: lêJ.;};.l ',,¡,ould be diffGreit if
.,~L",..J._ ().. ..~.u. '-'L~ -.)"'r....J.j~,_,
:~0.yn D.;lrl n,~:~'::e 1.'.'0uld CO:.19 ~_r: offe~iilg .:1 ;)lat. :'o.yo:, ':.ri:r:.d.::c:~itl 3to.tcd tì1.c ,la t }~.o..']
l")ts' t':a t 9.:-C le$;:; t~a:1JYW D.::::~C ia ::izc.)
I
- . A~l~~~~ - st~:~d tr.::re ~d a di8 t:Lnc t dif~aro~c8 in t~13 t t~c rrcli~.d..:ìary ~lat WQS
fi..JJÕ',l "Jnt a:.;:;-;ir0::1 T'>,:,:i.O":" -:0 fj.:r:.al accc~têJ.~ce. T:1C City is not b~u:r:.d by that :'relirÜna:"'y
3_1:.Y !,:rrrÐ. I
T1r:b:.... . 171~tl: a;¡d. ~lQ::::1-:f()'Jt - ba~:i:'!c1 tr.9 :'3.r1·: - stated ','!:ICr.. 1:e ori¿;inall:r ~OU0Ì1t
t':;e 1o.7':d., t:10 GG!li:1~ ryoint '::0..0 tì18 "pnr~: sl:8':m on tho ~lat.
:rr. ~Te...:!':i..n.s :Jt<ltJ:1 ()llr li~.bili ty fa::, dred~i:r:.,; the pord on tl:e tin.daclico.ted --,::tr~: la!1d is
I . --' '~ ~ .
su1Jject to Qn i::1~/c::-.se concte!':1no.tio;1 D.cti011, t~1Qt '::e acquire it. ;;e arc at fo.ult and ]lD.d
'1"1. _-if""..t. t '" ,I -1.'., ~'... .,...,~ ,..,~~ f"4..t.,r 1 . '..,..!..~, ..... C! .Þ ......1_ ~
_:0 ~ ___,'1.. 0 ,_,0 0'1 L.>.D." i::.ro:,c~ t..... ~~,'- 'J";""',;, co.lld end up 01\Y1TIz:, L.,lG 1,.5 :tc... c>.:> 0... p.:J....,~ la~G..
:':1..10::- ~·.'i!1dcc11itl ,;:;tatec1 ?;G '.7:J~ld Ì)a i::. fervor of t!13.t. j~r. Eo.::.r:·:ir..s <11::;0 st<1t8d tlw Gti:r:J-
latiot:G a~o t:w,t It1:e Dlat ·..!ould re::,a.i:1 tr.e 8o.~e; the City ':lOuld ho.ve D..!1 o:::vortunity to~
r81,.rj_C1".r it <'111:::1 ~cq.llire ~i:r.or C"::<1~lG8::;, br:. t t":18 undcrstandi::1.C is i t ~':ill be a::;proved 8::;scntially
'..t. ' ..t. \ 1 ' t' t ' . , .. 1 ..t..¡... d ':"1..t. d t' d'
8G ~" 18 presenL.cr. ~l !10U 3~Y MGJor reVl310~S. ~:c ¿:¡ GO SL.a",c. ,,~<1~ un ar ne Or~lnance,
we do tave the 2"'i~}lt to traat t~e ~lat as bein" void dS t'lC G-~a~th e:~tcn3ion of tir~e 'lo.S
m;-- " ',' .... - - ..-
ex?)ircd. -he r.1o::;t 11ro~ine:lt a:1d !'lost li~:cly risk the City faces lG the t~J.rca t the City
, ..
'.'IOuld ~lélve ti'J ~urchaGe ti:e ?:tr1: lo..r;.d, b'.lt 1:e stated t!:c:'e is .'1180 the ris1: tilct t t:'le ~lo.intiff[j
can convince t}!C bourt tho. t rtc tave nJt ?~JCGd8d in a proper fa.sio!1 a~~1 therefore pay
dam<3.ceG. I!1 :::-. r:é1':¡':~n8' oninion, tho3e clo..i??'!G do not have ~erit. Should the City be forced
to ~'J::"'c'ì.:tGe the }JD.Y"': 71:"Q:r:'e~ty, t'he caMc condc~::n=ttion rrocedurcs <1.rc u;:;ed as the City ia
1Jsin~ to :mrc1~ase eaS87cnts, and t~;o ~Jty '::;:mld be rÐo:!1onoible for coots involved.
__----4.
T'eo;nla!' City Council :'~eetin0
Sente~ber 20, 1~77 - ~inutcG
T'a~e (,
(Uayo-Ban':ey L<1.\'rSl1it, Continued)
~~"". J\hl'her":' - stated it GeG!":'!3 that t:18 dcvelo"'[:'8!'"3 acted in bad faith as well. He alGo .sar:
tte plat wl-;.ic'!1 r·~ayo 3.nd T'3an'.:ay destributed to ?Jrospective buyerG ¡-¡hieh clearly shor:::; a
nar!~ t~ere, and t~ere is also the question as to whether or not they delivered the deed
for t119 dA~~~nted parTt. rIe reco~mended the Council not accept the recorn~sndD..tion of the
Attorney of the t9r~8 ne~otiated.
La!'ry "etzlaff, T'lannlnr; and ZoninG ChaíY'!::arr - in his opinion, Vias very o:p:posed to acceptinc
the :)Y'elii'lin:'.;,:,y ~lat without a review a~d updatinr,- to our currc::1t standards.
,:rim ":llinr;, :!' ,?~ Z - in loo~:inc Clt the plClt for just a few !:.1inutes, tl'e ? ~~ Z counted about
S or 9 violjtions.
d' Arcv Bosel1, P ? Z - cloesn' t think it ar,rces at all \'ri th our Conpre\ensi ve Plan and
is violently Q0ainst the ~lQt.
Dal~h Kishcl, P & Z - a5~eed with the ~ost of the P ~ Z MeD~ers.
John ,T8~ans8n, P ~ Z - was opposed to the pInt.
In ~fuyo~ ~~in08chit's opi~ion, thiG is not a reasonable solution to the r~obletl because of
t~e ':':'ar~.: dQèi'~atio~, the dou:'lc-f.,..o~t lots, the substandard lots, nnd the fiJ.ct t'!1at they
creat~d the' !'cble1TI theMs8lvcs, t~lC C:ity r:1idn't create it. If our only potenti3.1 threat is
T"TJ.rchas:tnr; the T'ar~':, ~1e felt V1e !laY'~;: !'EI'y :)8 sO!Jethinc we r d '\'!a~t tC'J purc!1aS't, any ';:ay..
Dave 17"a'1n, l'7h'Ì'} 'll::tc'·:-fnot _ D..s~·:er] -i f" t'r1e '1156,GOO is for the 10s'3 taI:en yl3.':.c as a rc:::>ult
n-f' i.ncreascd costs j.n road àuildin.:;, etc., or for the rark ttat ha3 been clred~'ed by the
8i ty? 1re -reI t th.<) ·~15G, r:r¡") is the developer' 8 loss because he did not file l)rc.:perly to
"he~~_n \'!it~. (Attorney Har.r;:ins stated it includes en~:'l1eerinc; fees, expe:1se th'JY had i~
-nl,1.tti.n.S-, t~e de:1ial of t~le nS8 of t!:ci!' p:::'operty, the loss of pro;erty to the ~).::rj:, ar..d
the increasei C0~tS they will have to sustain by ~aving to put i~~rove~ents in.)
I
Cnl1~cilnerscn V,:tnderLaan ~ot0::l t}lC '11::/; ,ono '::.'18 cOF.":Juted l.'.rhen the Llterin Ordinanc9 was
, -
in effect, and tLat ','muld slÒs:t,:?nti:J.lly c~an.ze since it includes the vc..lue placed 0'1 the
lanct, I
Councilpersol1 O!'ttcl questionod the 50-foot street.::; in the ylat. !.~. Stoc;';:ì'!cll stated
t~8 ~rdinance sta~cs ~O-foot streets; ~8~ever, our current street standards require 66
feet. ~nuncil~~rbon n~ttel a3su~ed that nho111d these stiTIulations not bo accented, it w~v~
- \ ...
p:o to l)istrict Cou!'t, 1.7ith the City incurrins substD.!1tial defence costs o.long with the co,st
of aCl"!uiri:r;.~ t'1e pro,:;crty, w'1ich could GO into ~Clny thousands of dollars. Discussion Vias
t"hat by havins ::~}~o and 3an',:ey revise the 'Plat to include the cor!'ect street and lot width::;
the nll~1l)e!' of lot!> ':.'ould be severely reduced. ~':r. ~~av¡l·:i~s felt th3.t if that '..:ere to be
dane, a~ a,:,ree"1e~~ ~'¡ould Ylot be reached v.'Ìth the~. ~!e felt th.:lt if the plaintiff's are
~oiYlg to challe~~e the 8íty's neIT stQYldards (lot a~d street siZ8s), they ~ouldnlt ~ave a
lot of !:!erit. 'Jut they ::1ight hav8 sone r::erit by the fact th.:tt the plat waG a.pproved once
oy the ~ity. I
G011ncil";lcrson !"~~r;¡1Jre wad bothered by the ::1lmbc!' of dis"':Juted itc!:!s 3.::1d felt the City r..as
I . ~
to take a Gtand éU'ld SE'.y ~,'), de'3pite the cost involved. ?·:r. ~:,J:::::ir:.G felt the reasonableness
,
of the Ordinance r'}clli~i!1r; the filine; of a plat ':.rithiYl a certain period of ti~e is valid;
as the residents Tn the area are entitled to l:nQw ~~at is ~oi~G 011 around the~, and because
,'PIer a 'rIerl.od of ti~e circu;:;sta!1ce.s chan.r;e and rcquire!1entG cha.nge.
---..
7:'er;'112,!' Ci t:y Gou~cil ~~eetin~
,scntembcr 20, 1077 - r':inutes
Pap;e 7
(!:a;yo_"lan1,:ey Lm':sui t, Continued)
':(Vrln',: by ~'.'indschitl, Seconded by VanderLaa!1, that the City Council, City of Andove~J
not enter j_nto t~e settleP.1cnt stip',1,lation with Horace r'la.yo and Charles E. Brmt::ey as rro:posed
by the dO:U!'Jent delivered by the City Attorney for the followin¿; reasons: 1) Tì:1C par~:::
area in t~le proposed Dlat does not Mect current Ordinance require~entG; 2) Substandard
lots exist in tr.e TJY'oposed plat; 3) Othor proposed lots do not coy.'!ply with existinG
Ordinance; and '+) The nrop0sed street ,'¡fdtlle do not conform with c'lrrent street standa!'ds.
(Se'3 "?es01ntio21 Dll1f--7) Discussj_on VIaS on whether or not to include 80Jnethinß in the
~otion about the ~156,oon fi~ure no loncer being ~ertinent.
A!rs""~T)'-~'-rT TO J!0'PI;;;'r by Lachins1:i, Seconded by Crttel, that there is 1'-0 restriction on
filin~ tne Preli~inary ~lat in t~at p3rticular ~-2 zone at this time. ryiscussion vas
on the nert1nence of t~e a~end~ent. Attorney ~awkins explained that they do realize tbey
can file a "DIrt"!: at this tirw. Cou!"'"cilnerGons Orttel a:ld Lachinski \-d~çhd!'ev, the Second and
A"'.endY> ~nt to !~oti.on. j:!otion co.rried U!::J.nimousl,y.
Pni ver.si. t~,r Aven'19 -;;xtensJnn
COU;lC i1 TJ0rGon IÆlc"h:tns1d_ Y'e~orted t~a t in tal~{in,'š with the ~':ayor of Ea;j L~1J,=e, thoy v.rere
lt~Get over the UnivG!'sity Avenue ~oject and felt the City of Andover really ~as not
r.ooneratir!,~ that ~7ell ~'.':.th the:':'1. One of t':1.eir concerr.s was dividi-D$ the :project into
th""ee 1'10rt5JH18 Cpurctasinc _sravel, :r.auling- cravel, and '!'lirinc: cradintj r:or):). Council:p~son
La~"hin3:::i. rl)Y',orted that corro::;ponder:cc fron the LeaGue sta.te.'3 t'!1ore is no r::Q..son ~-:hy it
v!ould nnt ~a '!ïY'orar to be :--andled in the ~'¡a~l that H<J.;--.1 L<:tJ·::e is 3u.G¿:;e:::;tlns. T'1C otlwr
Droble~ ~as been' wanttn~ to TIut the ~oQd ba:l:: on t~e section line and whether or not
i "'"
th'3rl'J is dedicated !'if,ht of rmy to do that. Councilpersen Lac~inGl:i co~tacted all except
fo!!!' of the r9:::iclcnts on t'112 Andover side to see if they ';¡auld "b0 "..'illin.:; to de'iicatc the_
r.i.~ht of ·....ay needed for thi::: -çroject. ~'hc four rc:::idonts not contacted did ::10..\13 a'1 oa3e~1ent
rledicRted as indicated on their tax statc~ent. Of the In parcels, only t~o indic~tcd they
~-:ould not dedicate eD.S8?:19n t to t~lC ,:::i ty. C::Hlncilpcr son Lac:1inG~,::i conti~ued, r..o~e 'Jf the
lt1.nda',':ners r¡OUldlobject to t!1e .!'e:Jh.3.l1inC o.nd ?!,Q~¡idinG <1 33-foot surface and providi.:lg fer
-:JrrYD2r d~3.inD.,-Sc r;,itchi!1C. T~S'=-!' "'lQj~:-:-' co~cern ,'!as an objectian}to :-.13.soive tree rG:'"'!o'_rnl
to "Ü;¡ce the ro:t1 on the Gectio~ line. C:-ouncilne!'r:;on L3chin:>;:i îelt it ~-:as :::]'0 unr8a:,c:r.ablG
t ,.,. }.þ,.l d ~ °t~· t -1-1 .,.., -"'I"'t t >-.,-.,... ~,..., ,..,' ~... 1...,- ,1"> ,.,-.:t....~- r' -I- ...,.., ,i.-'1"
o .;1 :J....é1,_ 0.':1'_ "]8.", _lC v,18 :!:_OJ,-,~ 0 __.lnoJ. r......"'t'.a:_lnG ~~nc ._.lYEL. _~___ ,-,_'1J_11,_, ...0 .j_OI_",v
ncce~sary d~~ina~e Qnd to be able to aieauatelv raintain t~le rO.3.d. TI~e 8lerk otated ttat
'r - ,,'
4'.n c'hec1:~_nr;' 0n t'}Q ca:::e:~cnts, tr.e 8ity only Las carb-¡ay rif';''!-1ts, Vi:1ich ~canG rie couldllft dl
,
any ditc}lin~ ~ithnut nbtainins easements. ~ouncilpe!'son Lachi~G::i felt there ~ould be no
,. .
tr()lJbl~~ettin,,:, t1:.e e.::t3e~ents, as t:19 residents '\'!a!lt the i!;:prove~ent. :~e stated t!~at the
I
nAtitian sisned 11Y resident3 alon~ University Avenue stat~~: ~hc follo~inG Ilndersicned
""Y'I')T'erty (J'::neY's, i,:\:~e'~7illinG t:J dedicate thG 33 feet of property \'Jest of t!1eir eClst propertl
l~na '.':i.th the 1l!1Jì.erstar..din.",: that the east "":1ronerty line is t~e section line and the reason
I .. ,
f0~ t~e dedicatio~ is to allo~ t~le City to i~prove University Avenue Zxtension si~iliar
tD 1~,'7tr¡ Avenue r:~'OM Univc!'sity Avenue :::::xte:!1sio!1 to rTi.r;h\'lay 05 v¡ithout an assessment b.:lC-;":
, .
to t~ei~ pro~crt~. ~ouncilre~Gon VandcrIßan objected that t~i5 vas not the Council's
'!)ðs"Ï_t-Lnn, ,:ontc11cUn-; it ...,3.G ~ouncilr:erson La:hins1d.fs pe1:'Gonal Q]inicn. The last Council
,
a~ti0n ','ras ;:qy:crov;in,,:, the i!":!-prov8r.--tcnt of that road and nothing was saià about easc::1ents.
Later t11e City .'::ouncil charr.ed tl1e Cler~: ~'!ith investip;atinr: the e3.se::'lcnt.s to àe nlaced
I ~ .~ ~ .L
on a future a~enda. She o~jectcd that one C:-ouncilperson did in fact ,ersonally co~~unicatc
pit~ t~e residents offering ~~at essentially was a Council position, w~ich in truth was nat.
~ouncilner3~n Lachinski stated th~t any resident, and he was actinG as a resident, ~illins
,
to pass a petition should be aòle to do so. In discussinG the ~aintenQnce project further,
~onncilperson Lachi:lski stated the ~oad Coltt1ittee had no !,:nowledce of tho ea.sement problei:1
and the reco~~en~ation of the ~oad Co~~ittee stands as it was.
- -.-.
Pep;lIlar City Council ~'~eeting
SepteJ"'lber 20, lQ77 - ~~imltes
Pa~e !1
('!Tnive!'s:tty Avenue -r.::xtension, Continued)
"r:!,nslr)','l 'L!Olé1:::;~I,:, ~hair~an of the road Corn~ittee - stated there has been no chanGe in the
QTi~tnal position of the Poad Com~ittec, r¡hich VIas to join wi th ~TaL1. La~Œ in uPGrading this
~Q3~ 11n~e~ a n~j.ntenanC8 nrnject to a serviceable road to be maintained. It \'faS not to
~e a ~ajor p~ojeet. ITe stated it ~':aG Tram Lake's ori~inal intenti.on to establish the
cent'?r line. ~hey have now fou~d it is ~ot feasible. !TO\'l the tlÜn::inG is as lonG as the
!'()ad surface can be esta"blis"r:led at 3() feet and ~ept r:ithin the existing ri~[lt of '::ay, it
s~a111dn't he a ~roble~. The dividin~ line between the Cities ~oul¡l still remain t~e
seetlo!! 11:18.
Jiscuo::don on what !~aY.'l Lake has done relatin~ to the project as to whether or not they
~ave ter~inated it or just postponed it until next year. ~~r. :~olase'¿: stated the Hayor of
T1!J.T'1 La¡re c:aid they felt every !)~opo3al they've had has been turned d01':n by the City of
A~dover, and so they're waIting for Andover to coce up wit'.1. a solutio'? 0.1" sUGcestion that
¡'.rill be accepta'ble to both cOr.!~unitieG. Ns. Lindquist explained IIar.l LDJ:e Ì1aD no easements
- -
on t~eir side of tte rOGd and arc in t~o process o~ contactin~ their r:oidcnts about it.
Attorney "'!m'¡~::i~s e~~"91ai~cd t'!1at t1:e 3tablte that dedicates two rods on '";ither si.de of the
cente~ line is unco~stitl1tional to the extent that it ceases beyond the ~roa that's actually
nserl. As far as the ~ity h~8 actually a~d obviously used the rroperty, ~c c~n use it.
~te Gi ty Dceda D.:!1 easey;¡o:lt froM the pl~o!Jerty O','¡:TI"S to go outside tbD.t area. 7he City Gler3.:
waR d-!..rected to get the nosition of 'Ta!1 l£Ùe clarified and tl:e ease!;lents sl;.ra::;"ghtGned out.
Attorney Traw;:i~si clarified if on thesc rrojec ts the City ca~ lOGically 89pa~nte parto of
a project fo~ eco~o~ical ~easonG, t~is is leGal. ~:åen t~is i3 done Doley to 3void the
,
btd1in~ rC~11ire~ents, it is il19~al. CO'!.1:l":i.lperso!1 Lachir.s1:i cOPl::wntcd that the ::?o:1d
I!1n~()veY1en t '':::CJ,,1>"1i tte0 ~as reviewed all of tte "bad" roads in ttc 8i ty, and Uni versi ty
Avonue ~xte~sirnlis probably the ~or8t and ho~od that the Coun:il would sec puttin8 so~e
~ravel on it t~t$ year, becal1~e 8o~ethinG has to be done out t~ere.
, I
T'....i 0.... - J."'~nnel Ltcenf>e
H,"',rpT0'''' ~y rrttelJ Seco:Id~d "'y ~fcClure J to ay~r0Ve the Kennel Licc:lse for Gerald Prior
in ',',.''11ite :;a\:3 CoÜnt:r-y ~3t<l.tOGJ LQ:~ 1'1, lloci: 2. ~fotion carried unani:--.1'Jusly.
Va.CéJ.tlJ)TI of s:rn:;J'j Stref"!t
,
La!'ry Metzlaff, ChairMan of the Planning and ZoninG CODMission, reviewed the Com~ission's
reco,"'Condation t~ vaco.tc Crocus Stroot. 'Cr. Stockwell cxrlo.incd a YlOW caSCr.10Ylt dcscrirtioYl
r.as bean done an that the co~y of the e25eme~t deGcriptio~ the P ~ Z had and reco~~ended
é1p""O~oval o~ is incorrect a~d ì'!ould be replaced by the correct one. ::'Ir. ~:Gì'i~:ins stated the
~ity does not ha\~e feet title to t};e road, GO ~'lC have nothinG tha.t is narl:etable. ~Ic
also felt it r!Quld be ~roper to t<J.l:o "DD.:-t of the nar): for a street as in actuality it
\ - - -
creates a better recess to the park. ~~. Stockwell stated that all utilities except water
are in, ì'.rhtcn could bo installed in. the ditch in the future; so there is no need for a
,
lltil:ttics easctlent over t::e entire property. ':'he revised oa,'3eme~t covers all the utilities
t"ha t are in.
!:()'T1I()~; by O:-ttel, Secondad by Lachinski, to vacate that Dortion of Crocus street, deccript:b1
as fo 11 0 1'n : lyi~$ wcste:-ly of the ~rcsent Crocus Street aG no~ laid out, said parcel
bein:, a~~~oxi~ately S5 feet in ~idth and 2b5 feet in len0th, subject to Qn ease~ent for
uti-Ii ties and roað.~'.ray þl.trpOses, actual ler,al description to govern, fo:::", the follo~lling
r~asons: That it lis in confor~ance with Ordinance n, Section 'f.OO; it ba3 been ravie~ed
and ~iven aG~~oval by the ~ity ~nci~oer; Qnd it is in the best public inte~0st; no':: that
the Y'oé'!.rlway haG been ~oYed, it serves no pur?osc to t~ City. Discussion: wa.s on tbe
- ---I·
ne01tlar 8i ty CO'J.ncil !~eetin?,
Sentenbe~ 2n, 1077 - ftln11tes
T1::1se <}
(Vacation of SrocllG Str89t, Continued)
aCCll::'é:J.CY of t1.8 n8':¡ easerr:ent descri::tion as the r.rD.þ Gho~'IS a :'ltility o'Jtside of that
'Ì.~sc!'5.1'lt:ton. C:ouncJlnersons Lachins!::i Dnd O~ttel ¡'d thdre':¡ the Second and the !':otioTI, a.nd
t~e ite~ ~ill be carried over until the next re~ularly scheduled meetin~. ;~. Stoc~:~el1
will ~heck int0 t'h8 mQtter and ~rovide the Council ~ith an accurate easement description.
~T(V"!0~J by Lac::ir.s1:i, .8econdad. 'by !:cClure, to extend the meetinlj until 11:30. Eotion cÐ.rried
11nanimously..
Va!"'ianr:e rle011est - ?1o.r; c Durley
:'!r.. "'etzlaff reviewed t~le !"' ?~ Zfs recor::'?".'lGndation for approval of the Variance :request of
~'~9.rie ":)'Jrley of P.:1rcel 1,S30, in \'l~ich t1:e ro..rcel would be less than the curren.t City
req11ire~ents in that zone.
!'~ariG 2:1rlev - stD-ted the parcel is It-a ac~es, a~d t!lere is no "','ay any land can be added
to it to :1"11::e it l:tr('er. Discus.'Jion waD on whct:;'er this '.'.raG a lot of record prior to the
ado:ptii..ill of the Zoninc; C'rdinancc. Ir3. Jurlcy stated Tract A '.':as sold i:l ~cbrua:'y, 1972, ad
it ~ad not been a lot of record b~fcre the Ordinance had been ado~ted. ~s. Lindq~ist
also stated the I'arcel r:D.S cole! a..:'ter the ado-ption of Ordinance S, 1'.r'!1ich v:as in violatio!1
of t'!lC Crdina1:ce. At that ti~::G, Tfs. :Surley was not Ð.·...·are it ',"'3.8 in violatjon 'Jf the
0rdi;tance. S~e is reque.stine; a Varia:'1ce on it now to 'be able to Get a cle.:\:, lec;al opinion
on tt and t'J rla':e it a leGal parcel.
l"1ì~Ir:~T ny C.r-ttel, ,Soccmded by Lac:Ün::;i:i, tr..at t~e Sity ~ouncil crant the Va:ris.nce request
to '~a1"ip- P'lrley r0Y' ::'tlY'cel 1 ~3(), 10':':3.1 desc~:'ipti8n as contained in tl18 :?lanni!1~ and ZO!lìnß
r:or1'Ti:-:>'3:l011tS recDr.~·ner,C!::tti0;¡ fo!' Sect~_0!1 7.01 of Crdinance 10, él:1d t1:at the ';lariG.!1ce :)8
r"."rant9r1 11r~d~r Sr;ct5_0TI 1.(~.02, C'rdiYléJ..r:.~0 10, 'Iariance to alloi'! a ::~etÐ:J ar..d bounds lera1
, .
t"ra~~fg~ of an under3izcd ~etes and bOl1~ds lot far t~e recon~cndatian3 aD follo~3: There
,
W~3 no ~11hlic 0Ptosition; it ~ould not be detriMental to the area; it confor~s to the
existin,,; llsages in the area. (See :Resolution Rl15-7)
'lOT": 0'[ !lOTIO": YES-Lachinski, !'cClure, Orttel, 1'!indschitl; !TO-VanderLaan
~'~otion carried.
Variance ~eauest _ D. go~~att
,
Vr. ?etzlaff explained the Variance stens fro~ a lot sylit in ~hic~ the 1eca1 descrpition
l'.ra~ incor::--ectly 1ro.:'.'n 1l~. On0 lot ':ra~ to 'ba 30.7') wid8~ tr..a~ it caf.1O out. '.:'he .Planning
,
~0~~tcsinn ~9vic~cd tJ:i3 a~d felt this ~~uld not be crcati~~ a ne~ lot b~t si~ply cettinG
a ~o-aliS~Mc~t of t~e Int t1!at ~as crtzi~Qlly intcnded.
'~~In~ hy n~~~elJ Sacand.:1 by :~Slure, thCtt the City Couccil G~a"t 0. VCtriCtncc to ~ictCtrd
T~()r;~3.tt for t'hð ~':::·C1pert.y (ì.escr~:...bed as described in the lCC3.l dCGcr::'ption .sul1~)lied 'by t!:c
,
Pl::tnniYlr,' ::1:1d Z-,}::15.n: r:::lT"::~tssion foY' t:1C follnwinr; reD..GonG: A ::'i.:r:.:!.ncial ::ards~li l) \'fO'Jld b·C:!
, . .
C-^a.l-",,4 'h'T ~^t f"Y',,",r,.l-i...,..,. t1,c ',....,...-;.,·..,co '">"" ....,..,.,... ...."'''tl·^- 11· n^ Of' ('.r~l-;·....·..,-....C^ 1"'- .1-',,,, r<~.l-y
-'---' L.~.,. ')" ~L'~ ,,-1....1'-'_..,_' '. ..c-..~___,_. ~ '--'-oJ ~.'.~_ .J~"" J.. ;.'.L -'- _, ....I..'-~.U._l '---' .,J, L.I..... '....:..1..
Attn....n0yl~ np~nt~~ a:r:d reco~nc~dation ~0rc Givan; it will not cY'catc a~y u~buildable lots
or be det~ispntall to a~y Gf th0 ~c~a~nin: ~ro~e~ty; the City ~n3inocr l1o..d revic~ed it 3.nd
was satisfie1 ~ittl ~ega~rt tC1 Ge~er stubs; and t1:c d~awinG3 ~lave been approved by the Cou~ty
~Ti~h~qy ~~~inQer rer tho attac'1ûd S1:2tC'1. T~e Varian~e to be subject to the c~~bined lots,
lA~al -:1.~:>c!'í')tiont D.S 81JIlTIliGd "by t118 Cert1_ficate of Survey. Di.:;cu83ion tl:J.G on whether
or ;tot a leral '~:rln't(J:1 '::.::ts ~i'.ren Q!1 t~í3 Vo.rio.1:ce. Councilnerson O:~ttel D~L:STED ?;C)!~
:~0""rr"'~~ t:19 ~eîGre~c:e to the City Attorr..cy'c; o:ni:Üon and rec~I1~1encìa.tion. Secorrd still
stQn~s. (Sea PC381!ttion "1IG-7) ?~tiQn cQrried unani~ou31y.
--...
"er;nlar Ct.ty 8'í)lJ_~cil :~ccti?1.':7
SG~te~be~ 20, 1~77 - !fi~ute~
~a!:je 10
Sller:i_al Pse Pe:rnit - Velvin "')nt'r1
l~~. ~0tzlaff ~eviewed the ? ~ Z's roco9~endation for approval of a Srecial rso Per~it
~8nu0sted by :·~lvi~ Dnth. ~~e intention of the Specj_ol Use rcr~it was to establish a
')1)........0·..' nit on th) -:::_":"oT1Ðrty for tl~e i_ntention of m:;lnt: the dirt &8 termino.l fill in the
~ltr~ent lan1f~11. ~he Co~niGsion discussed ~lat was that goi?1C to do to the land durins ad
a~ter t~e 1')T1r;ration. ~~..... Stocl:','.rell D.:1r1 their en.r::;ines!' revic'.'.rcd the plans and CD.t:18 up witll
....~com~e~1ation8 aG to the de~th and actl1al area of the b8rrow pit, ~efer8nced in the P & Z
~~ti0n as to ~he li~it of t118 borroIT pit, the top soil havinG to ba replaced and contours
havinr; to be estaòlts:1Üd. !~~. stoc;:1'¡ell then explained t~1ey det8~n:L~lcd t~at the hi~hÐr
land ':.roulri be ased fo!' ::he bo!'ro1'! ::.Ji t, and once the fill i::> rcr.lOved. fror.1 the :!).t'operty,
i.t '",rill still r8;.~Ð.i:1. in exce¡,s of 10 feet above the rmter table, na~:~_nß' cure it would be
snita'hle as buildable pro~Jerty. Tl~crc are trees involved ttat "Jill 'lave to be rC;Joved,
but ;;r. Stoc~:~';cll felt t?lis ','!O.5 tr,e only feasible area to obtain t~1iG fill and not create
an unòl1ild;::tble Greft latcr.
T)nn "'0t'h. ~·~Ð.nar:G1~ af t;H~ landfill - stated tte cover ,,¡auld b0 used to ì..res3 up,slope3,
pr-i1'ì.arily O!1 t1:.e G0uth slo~;es, anrì. to~ .s0::'1 cover reQuirci:!ents. It I S p;.rt of the terr:in.::tl
rroject. Tilc !:latlJr~_Ql cOY'1ín[i :ro~ thi!J are,:). is not l,'/hat the CO'J::1ty wD.ntc for top cover;
Ì1o'.'/cver, it will he n80d j_rl D. terminal dl~essinG. !~QY01" r:ind:>chi tl qucst-:.oncd ,'¡hen will
t:!1e are3 of tl1~ lcmrlfill close to "?ed 03.~:s ?·D.n::>r be :::"e:::eivin0 the tc!'r:1Ínal cove!' on it
that the (jonnty .7'equi!'cs. T~e cto.tcd thD.t .cra!1ti!lG t1;.ic ?er:-.1Í t ".':ould allow further per?ctu-
atio~ of t:H? lar.df:i.ll 'l::>y [tllm...in~ ~orG dirt to be ~ut in there, but thore :l~'S '"aeon no
""O!'0r;Y'ess in the ~o.rt tr.at is fin:tsl:e::l to ~eet the County and rCA st3ndo.rds. ~,~,.,. ?Ot::l
ex~lainÐd that tJ'C!'A are certain a~eaG of t~c lo.::1dfi11 ttat need sorne slone ~or:;:"c:tions
done. Ad1co!1duns 1'.ave b·:;c!l Gub;:dtted to t;~e County re::::ardi:1G the lo.:làfi11 ;ite itself.
!ír. ~f')tr.. conti.n'lCò, rcr:arài!lS the a::>:'ea nest!" ?'ecl ('a~:.s, };.e 'hD.G discu::ïscd cattinG ..-.::omo off-
G~te naterial i,¡ t~at area in conj~!lction with a City proj8ct, which hD.3 yet to l)e recolved.
At t?le !'''?qn.c:::t o~ th'J COT~1ty, the landfill ;las cnG.::l.~ed to have <1 dc:;:o3ite Ij.11.e DludG~
r'"3.teri.3.ls adrl.ec1 to the lo.ndf:i_ll a:-:: é1 fir;.al co..p on or o2Òo1J.t :Yove:>:1Òc,::- 1. Il!'~ r·:ot?1 "'Jtated
the fill fro~ the bo~~ow ~~t is 3i~~ly to d~eG3 uþ the l~~dfill foy co~tinu~ng ope~Gtion,
~lich ~n n~e~ tolall City rcsidents on a freG basis. r~yor ~indsc~itl qucstioned ~O~ the
C"'lnc4l "'·'J.n a~~~-:")v"" é"n~·rtì'';nr'' tnat '''0''lr1 ......crnp+".,te the l".....dfill ,··"hen 1"8 ....::¡n't "'-et +~1'>
,~. .'- ~. ,.,- '1 ~ ,. J .-'., , .. ,".- '- :. ~'~"".~"'" - "-".L ,.....,..... <,,"."
c0~:1T"11etcd "1.:lrt.'3 9f t:1C lar:1fill finiorlsod. CouYlcil~cr:::on I..aCrlins~:i. o20~ced with the :.::t:P(;!'
a:J.d 1,'.rante1 to 3e$ t;v~ fin,:tl 1110.1;,8 of ','¡hat t~e landfill 13 P!'o"Jooed to be ~'/hen 2.. t is ca:::!T,leted
I· ~ -
Rn~ fGlt a stroDITer effort stould be ~ade by the landfill to get t~i3 recolved.
I
Jar~y SllndD. ~nrineG~ ror the 13ndf~11 - ex)lained at the point tiley'ro-at on the cite
rir,:ht n'Jl".r, thC:.rf~C :aced ....itl1 loo~·::i.nr; for î'::'ll for coyer a:1d for their daily o;arcttion.
Thc cover Qrc.:::: tÌ'.C'T ~¡QVC boen u~=-::1S arGon the southeact ~art of the s-ite. The next
I " . --
area of 1:)Cic.:l1 90vcr tuder t~~c e::istin,::O; per;iÍ t is the 1'lo,Jdcd area bctr.rcen the office and
t~e rc~d in t~lC nort~~~st corner. Since the Citv haa rreat rcservations about ~oin~ into
I ,¡ '.> 'J '-.>
that area o.nd :..~elov2.:l['; t~e trcco and until they've net ",rith the þlan~e:' for tl:e City and
thiG i.GGlle j)} rcsolved, the'T o.rG .:lG~:in,"",· :;:"0;: this ~8rT1it to tct;:e fill fron adJ"accnt 'Jr'O'Dcr-ty,
, " . ~ ~ ~
COllTIci1pe::oson Lo.Cr1ir..3::i st.:ttcd ·...rc \'i<1.::lt to Gee ;::;or:w a[,'Y'ecr.1cnt thD.t the no!'th','!cst .:trea is
not ;':;1'):"11."; to be touched o2r..d how tte IQndfill is S'oi:r..C to 100;: ~":hcn it iD 0.11 done. 1'2'.
.s~md.e :::tatcd t:1E) ¡::o.ste DicpcGal Site i.8 0".~'n8d by a different entity than tte land on ','¡hich
t~G 3~eci[l1 'Use ?prr.1.it is beinG reqllGstod; and. ;·:r. 'R:Jth explained the area to 'be used for
t'1c bor!'Ol'¡ :::ite iþ the nost wide OT'C::l [tr9Ct of the three 40-D.c!"e ~)a:='cels \'.rith nJt th<1t m<1ny
trGe~ ~einr, re~oved.
I
A v~,,:,y le::tr:th.'l rlitcus3io!1 co~tinued as to the City ~':aYltiYlg More infor:::.ation on the final
I
contou!'3 of t'1e l$.:ldfill D.::1Q it'D ultj.r:;atc "Jse, '::het~lOr or not the City 3hould "!JcrDetuatc
1.'1. - -
~.t::: eXiGtencR, Œnd r. Poth and :~. S~nde explai::linc tIle 113e for the fill from the
b0::'"'TO¡'! ....,it a~ld ......"...1 it is needed. l:~.·Sunclo exr'Jlained that fi::lal contours !lave been sub-
~;.;_tb:d to t"'w GO:lTlty élnd PClt, and they i;ldicate they aTe r/illin,~ to D.f",ree with the chanr:'es
. ~ _ u
S'JbJ9Ct to lo'::al a"Jproval. :~. ":oth explained t?rat he ?rac been tryinc to develop different
De~ular City COll!:cil ~~eetinr;
geptember 2O, 1077 - 1,finl1 tea
T'a~e 11
(Sneci.al rIse reT'~it - ~:elvin ?oth, Continued)
layouts ani alternatives for the end use of the landfill are~. -::e tried to set up a
"1eeti..nr; with the Far1:/Decreation r:oM~issi()?1, but they didn't ~ant to discuss this until
the other matter is settled. ~~Y'. aa':¡kins ex-plained that the fact that the land to be used
as trye Dorrow ~it is on a contract for deed has no bearinG on the situation as that is
between the ve~dor and vendee as to the ri~hts involved. ::r. Path stated that there would
DB n0 activity in the area of contention stated in the addenduM. The material fro~ the
borrow f:it ~ill be ~oin~ to other areas within the landfill.
DisC11ssion was then on the directives Given the::ouncil in the Ordil:ancc pertaining to
the criteria to òe considered ~hen issuin~ Special Use PerMits. COllncilperson VanderLaan
stated if these concerns are specifically ans~ered, the ~~ecial Use fcrmit ~ould be
r:ranted. If not, further infor~ation or research shall be iirected. Discussion ~as that
t~e Special Use PerMit is for the rc~oval of the fill anu not where it is to àe deposited.
~·~r. T'>etzlaff 8tatec1 the P 8.~ Z also discussed the problem v:ith the lanìfill, 'but t'.-1e
reco~~endation for approval of the Special Use Per~it was solely on th~ removal of the dirt
for r<1i;i1inf?;. Also, there would not be an adverse traÎfic pattern created because the fill
would ~ot be 0oi~~ on any ~ity roads, just frOM the borrow pit to th8 l~ndfill. c:.ollncil-
"erson Lachinskt felt that dcstroyins the trees to get the fill would not be envior~~entally
S:J11:J.<i.
I
~:f'ìmJnlT '8y t~cGlu!"e, 3'ecanded by 0rttel, t~lat the City Council app~ovc a 3pe~ial Use Per~it
fr)~ Mining reqw?sted b~t :'~el'lin ~ot~ for the purpose 0: creating a 'borro'"'' pit, location
Plat r:;r:;C)34, T'areel 10, as defined "by attachr:.ent furnished by the PlanninG ant1 Zoning
~ommi83ion for the following rea30~S: Fropased plan c~nfor~s to Section 4.24) Ordinance 3;
annl i.cant r.as s1(br:1i tted cont01Jr yllarw; !"IO p1Jblic oPPo3it~Qn to the ~ininG ope~2tion; Ci t~l
~n~ineer reco~~ended proposed site as a feasible site; the finished contours of the mining
oTIeration to be lin accordance with the drawing submitted; the area disturbed is to be
seeded accordinl to r.ity standards, and tta entire excavation :e performed under the
di~ecti0n of t~9 City ~n~inQer. DisCl1ssion: The ~scrow Ordinance requires a \~~osit
I .. -. -
from the a~pli~~nt, r~ich would ~11ara!1tee rayrnant of the ~ity ~n3ineer to direct t)c ~ininc
o;'>'2rati:::m. DisCHGSi01. cO:1.tin'led (J!1 including within the !':otion th3.t fill Îro~ the nininß
o~8~~tio~ be lt~tted to the landfill a~d that this fill ~ould not be allowed to be put
on slones cover~d in t'1e addQndu~ to the G01]~ty.
G01InC i l-:;eY'san ~:cGlHre A TrY::~1) 8;; !:(,)':Tn'~ to inc lude: 'rhe fill to be limited to use in the
lan'Ì.fill o!1I:y. becond stj,ll stands. ~iscussion: loT. ~raw;:in3 stated if the !:1in:'nc;
,
aD~lico..tion ~eetG the rqq~lire~ents of the r.rdina!1ce and the excavation iG not beinG used
,
in an 111e.,;0..1 i'a8hion, the -:::-eY'!"1it ::nst be granted. That there may be proble~3 with the
, .
a~~licant in another .subject is not reason for denial of the Speci<ü U3C Ferr.J.it. By
p!lttin~ the dirt in the landfill, he is not violatins any Ordinances or Statutes of the
'3ity or tr.c (jounty.
VnTP, ~ì"'! 1!C'r::'I8~'!: Y:S3- !·:cSlllre, 0!'ttel; ~~tì-Lachinski, VaYlderLaan, ¡'lindschi tl
Potion defe<J.ted.
TJiscussion: Hr. T-:a'.7~;:ins !,\0inted Qut t~HÕ! Souncil has 0..:!1 oblie;ation of law '.'1}1e:!1 rejecting
an aDplication to ~al(e a ~0tinn sitin~ the s~ecific violations of the Ordinance. Council-
I -
~erSO!1 VanderLaan felt t~at the City 80uncil did ndhave precisely that which ~as needed
to jeter~in~ spe¢ifj_cally that it is not detri~ental to the health, Gafety, morals, or gen-
eral 1'.relfare of the co:--:~unity. T~e:, intent was to ask for additional investi¿,;ation fror.J.
t'he staff ì'rlth res:Dect to those 'Provisions in the Ordina'1ce.
"ayo'" "rinrJschitll felt it was n0t in the interest of the welfare or health of the City of
An'1'Jve!' as it is a11ow:tn!; the perneblatio!1 of Gonething that ì~'e can't F;et resolved, and
we're endin~ u~ with a n'Jtential hcalt~ TI!'oblem there until we get the landfill site in
its f"j.nal form. Ue felt that it's to t11C point that either SQr.J.8 proGress is shown and the
?e~1l1ar City ':ouncil ì:eetin~
Seþter:1.òer 2f), 1C)77 - 1finutcs
ré1~e 12
(S~ecia1 Use Permit - r~e1vin ~oth, Continued)
final fory;, is furnished or the la!1dfill be shut dCI';'m. He envisionod the landfill
conti:!1llin.~ at the presc!lt rate, and i:!1 the end the County and City havinG to finish it
off. Council"!,erso!l Lachinski aGreed l,vith the Hayor.
Anot~er len~t~y discussion pursued on the reasonS for the application of the ~ininß permit
and where the fill is to be deposited, the issuing of the Special Use PerMit pertaining
to the removal of the fill only, can the perpetuation of the landfill be considered as
reason for the denial, the City ~antinr, so~e rrogress on the finioced portion of the land-
fill as to the final cover, a final ~ltirnatc use plan be ~resented of the landfill area
wr.en it is comnleted, and ~hat action should be initiated rer,ardinG the denial of the
Snecj.al Use f'err.li t.
gn'T'T0'! by Lachins1d, Seconded by !'~cGlure, to reinstate Councilperson EcC:lure's motion with
tnA addition that we direct the r.ounty to Dusnend further o~eration of the landfill until
such ti~e t1at the owners of the landfill can provide the nec Gssary in:¡"o!'r.1a tion for the
'.:ity to p;ive their a~TIroval for t~e o~eration. Discussion: Counci}~21erson HcClure
0118sti.f)ne~ tieiri~ in the landfill oU0ration with the mininß operation. Ix. Roth stated
tJ."e landfill ona~ation is run lJy a corporation and the applic.:ttion for a mininG per;;¡it is
re01l8steri by an individnal property owner. That individ~al beinG an off~cer of that
co~n0ation 10 i~relevant. :-:e felt the ::1ining l)erm.it will not be detrir:Gntal to tr.e
'!)rOT1erty, the enr;ineer \'laG consulted, and t~e mininG plans are in confcr~aLcc with what
V18 ? ?~ Z ·.':a!1bF~.
i
VnT'-; O"T ~~(JTInn: ! Y~.S-Lachi!13:':i; ?~'J-:":çGlure , Orttel, VanderLaan, '.'!iYldschi tl
~~otio!1 defeated.'
"(V"I(1), by Orttell, SecoYlded by '~:Clure, that t'lis be referred to the PlanYlin¡; ane: Zoning
Com~ission to de~er~ine if there is a health, safety, or welfare hazard and to tte City
Glcr~r for the 8~Me rea80~ and be ~laced on the next a~enda. !';Jtion carried unÐ.nin:ously.
rne"TInr¡rar.v HO'hi.lel-q01'lG Dermi t
~:'l"":((;~.J by o~ttel~ SeCOYld'3d by ~TcSll1re, that the City Council ap~rove a gO-day ~~bilo [o~e
~)erM1t for ;'r. c..nd ~·<:'8. Pick "S·ar::ell of 3110 Pleasant Vie\'! Drive, Sprine L()l-:;:e Park,
~~iYl~esf)ta, fo:-- their hoY:~e uYlder cctGb"'uction at 17610 Orchard Street '·~':l, Andover, subje~t
to their installrn5 an aDDrovod well and on-site sewage system, "otion carried unanimou"ly.
:r"'Rr1':/":'Oecreatio!1 ~nr;¡r:1iJ3::>io:l - C,)"1rv:~ly1i ty School
I'~8 . '.T~n"'v ':íap''''n'!1 l Cnordinator for CO;.'1J'1ani ty School ProGram, presented the Council with
c ~. " ,"!'.
C npios 0 f t1-1e flye,:" on t~e co"";.:::unity 3ch2lo1 progran àei!lß' sent to Andover residents and
thnse Der¡nle i;l joon ~apids livin~ north of Bi5h~ay 242. She explained her position is
7'edorally fUYldeð r:,3.ve sor.;.e bacl,:;:;round info!'T:1atioYl OYl hersclf, a!1d stated that hopefully
the nro~ran Wil1lbe exnanded next Be~ester,
~tre ~revention Cnn~íttee
1
Vic ~van8, Interim ~ire C~ief - explained the Co;;¡~ittec's current plans are to have an
additional tQnkej of anDroxi~ately 1100 to 1200 gallon ca~acity which will be the vehicle
wc nbtain t1::,ou[';", the D~;? to convert to a tÐ.nl-::er. The D:8 vehicle will be a ta.nker as
well as a b~u8h chicle. 1Te felt in choo~ins between a sin~le larGer tan~er and t~o smaller
units t!1at serve ]dual uurposes, he 1,'1Ould cho:::;e the trIO vehicles.
~ob Peach, ~ire Prevention Co~~ittce - stated another reason for two tankers is under our
~1utual Aid Aeree~ent, we have to be able to support a fire within our own City and be able
to help adjoininG Cities as well, so two ta~1kers r.1ay well be needed at some ti?'1c.
-------->--
~eGu.lar I';i ty Ccuncil ?':eetinc
'septer.1ber 20, 1977 - ifinutes
"ar;e 13
(~ire ?revention COM~ittec, ~ontinued)
l';ollTIctlre!'son !!cSlure stated the value of the equip~ent on the vehicle is ',~'orth the price.
!1'r. ~vans stated t~ere is a te~Dorary stora~e locatio~ in the cOEmunity for the vehicle,
bnt he is also 1001d~r: into asking the City of Coon Rapids to store it for us until we have
a nermanent huilding.
!fnrrT(ì~; r,y r,.achtnG:~i, Seconded by ~cClurc, that the City Council, Clty of A~dover, authorize
~lnos for t~e ~UrCh3Ge of a 1,OJO-~allon t8nl~er froM the City of Goon Rapids obtained throuCh
hid,
vn~~ (1"; !'·:O~I0~'T: Y2S-Lachinski, !::::Clure, o~ttel, 1 ~'indschitl; ?'TO-VandS'rLaan
!1otion carried.
Cnr.1"1unica tio"js COr1":":!', ttee
Charles Vie".1an, Chair~an - reviewed so~e sestions of the ~ewsletter stQtiuc it should be
going to the printer by ~riday a~d s~ould be available for F:ail a week from Friday.
Corrections and chans0s made were: The story about Kaney qaG~on and the Co~~unity School
has been chanGed, sinee l::any of the things in the original story are in ~1er flyer; The
arti.cle on the Pe:'Do::1nel CO:;¡;1i ttec \'Ta3 taken out; Vie ~van's title is Int~ri~ Fire Chief.
'::'!1e Council informGlly approved the ~-re"'¡81ctter for print.
p(VrTO:T by 'landerwan, Seconded by Crttel, to adjourn, ~:otion carried unani'1cusly.
r~etin~ adjourned at 12:30 a.~.
Pesnectfully sub~itted,
'\\ l~~--U:~~L
!farce.lla A. Peac~ ..
~ecn~din~ Secretary
(ßf'·~ð'H.c /"/h
/~/' 'r7
- .- -