Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC November 15, 1977 CITY of ANDOVER ~~r;UV\.R r;pry ('.:()TTNr.:rL H"S"STING - 1\TO\7'S~·ffi~ 15, 1977 "PTUr"s ~oe PegulA~ Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Hayor Jerry Windschitl on November IS, 1977, 7:36 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown ~/,)111ev~rd "",TW, Anoka, "'''innesota. ".:ouncil"Oersons ,!,!Y'esent: Lachinski, McClure, Orttel, VanderLaan ~ouncilnersons absent: tTone A180 "(')"resent: City Attorney, ~illiam G. ~awkins; City Engineer, Rex Stockwell; TKDA Consulting ~ngineer, Dewey Kasma; City Clerk, p. K, Lindquist; and interested residents, Pesident "'arum Posella SonstebV, 4100 Seventh Avenue - rather than waiting until the December 6 meeting, she rreoHested ~ouncil a~proval toni~ht to move a bouse into the City, as it has already been approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Building Inspector. She had want,,¡ to begin now because of the weather, '~yor Windschitl explained the Ordinance requires tt be acted upon at the second meeting; hov~er, the majority of the Council may place it on tonight's Agenda, W;_n81ow TTolasek. 1179 Andover Boulevard !Try - commented on the fast, efficient, and thorough service he received from the Deputy Sheriff with regard to hunters on his land, The hunters claimed the City had no Ordinance that could be enforced and that they saw no signs coming into the City, 'Ie thought some consideration Might be given to providing l~rp,er, more notice~ble si~ns on the City entrances. Hr. Hol~sek w~s also concerned about the erosion from the road ditches into the drainage rtttch alon~ Pr~irie poad. Ue understood large rock was to be put in the road ditches 20 feet hRCk from toe ditch to stop erosion, The rock was actually dumped in the drainage ditch, Be was also concerned that kids might throw the lose rock into the ditches; and if that happened, is the City going to be responsible for cleaning that up, Mr, Stockwell ex~lRine1 the rock was dumped in the "~ong spot, but it will be placed in the roadway ditch, Mr, Stockwell also felt the way to solve the problem of lose rock was to grout the rinrap in place as is done in other storm ~ewer projects, r·!r. Holasek agreed with that solution. 4~enda A."nnroval , MO~rrW by LB.chiI'ski, Seconded by )"cClure, that the Agenda be approved with the following chan~e8 : Add Item 6d, Shade Tree Program Application; Add Item 7e, Sonsteby Moving Permit; Add Ite~ 8c, COMmunications Committee; and Add IteM 9c, PCA Heeting with Melron, Inc. Motion c8rried unanimously. I ~um Piver r.ro~stn~ I "ngtneer Stockwell reviewed his letter to the Council of ))ovember 11, 1977, sumMarizing , what information he had been able to gather with regard to the proposed Rum River Crossi~ ~s to the nroje~t time schedule (it depends on fina~cing available, but is only a concept at this time ~nd I~. Stockwell felt the reality of constructing it within 5 years is very , mi n1_m~ 1), future rOi'{dway extension (location has not yet been determined; the City of Andover will ~l~y a major role in determining that location; it could be 10 to 20 years from now dependi~~ on traffic volume, the type of development in that area, etc,), traffic volume (current average daily vehicle traffic between Seventh Avenue and Round Lake Boulevard is 4,000 vehicles per day; based on population projections for the area in the year 2f)f")f), it will remain the same), evaluation of cost to the City of Andover (the cost Pe~111ar r.:ity Council Meetin~ 1-Tovernber 15, 1977 - Hinutes Pa~e 2 (pum ~iver Cro~sin~, Continued) would denend on whether the County of Anoka or the City of Andover would initiate the nroject of ro~d extension to the east of Seventh Avenue), and alternate bridge location (County of Anoka considers the location north of the Senior High School the most feasible location to serve the needs of Andover and pamsey), Mr, Stockwell also informed the Council that the County of Anoka has scheduled a number of roadway constvuction projects in Andover, which are the ungrading of Pound Lake Boulevard from Bunker Lake Boulevard to ~i~hway 10 in lq7~, bituminous paving of shoulders along Bunker Lake Boulevard to extend into Ham La~e in the near future, uound Lake Boulevard is under consideration from Bunker La1{e '1oulevard to County State Aid 20 ~ast possibly as soon as 1979, ð_no1{~ r.:ol1nt:v r;nmmissi.one:r 'Rd T<'telds - was more optiMistic about the time table of the Rum ~iver ~rossin~ and is honin~ fundin~ would be available sooner. Hayor Windschitl asked if there is a nossibility the County could designate a location for the extension between !=';eventh .o\venlle I1.nd P0l1nd Lake Boulevard so the City of Andover could obtain right of ways J etc Mr, '1ud Pedenenny explained this project development report is the recognition of a project, Seventh Avenue is gain" to be the easterly limits for a long time. Also, he expected the City of Andover would be the indicator as to when the easterly extension would come about, mhe ner~etuation of right of way should be addressed by both the City and the County, Hr. Pedenenny agreed that some theoretical line of where that extension will be should be indicated, but that must come about at a public hearin", He explained that the County has not picked a crossing or the alifIT~ent as this must be done at the public hearing, ~he pUblic hearing will be held as soon as the PDP, which is in the process of being 'DrepAred, gets approved, After the public hearing is held, the map can then be drawn indicatin,?; the brid~e, road alignment, etc, so that arm can be protected for right of way and roadway þurposes. In discussing the traffic on Seventh Avenue, Mr, Redepenny felt the majority of traffic will. ' want to go in a north-south direction on Seventh Avenue, and he didn't anticipate much change in the east-west traffic off Seventh Avenue at this time, At the best time to do it and when money is available, the City and County will work together on the easterly extension from Seventh Avenue. He also mentioned that traffic is monitored on the corner of ~emns store; and when it is warranted, traffic signals will be installed there, Also, in looking at the two possible locations for the bridge (north of the High School or off of Industrial Bo"llevard), '!r, uedepenny stated both roads would end up at the same place on Seventh Avenu~. I '''s .Sonsteby Mentioned that cars go throut,:h her property novl crossing from Round Lake Boulevard to Seventh Avenue despite the fences she put up, She offered the County 50 , acres of l"md around Pound Lake several years ago to construct a road, and the County refused It, Shel favored that location for a road and stated if the County wanted to build a road there now, she would be willin¡; to cooperate with them, I ' Discussion conti~ued on the fact that the project would not have a significant value to the ~ity of Andover without the access road to Pound Lake Boulevard, The possibility of including the access road in the PDT:'! was also discussed. Mr, Pede penny agreed; and if the pryP is not completed, he would see if that could be included, However, he didn't know what federal funds were available and couldn't insure that that would automatically Make it oualify for federal funds, I W"\mrrw by Lachinski, Seconded by Orttel, givin~ Anoka County concept approval for the , nroTIosed Pum ~iver r,rossin~ contin~ent upon consideration for þroviding access to Round Lake ~oulevard, IDiscussion: ~r, Pedepenny preferred the City express a location for the hrid~e ~t the uublic Hearing. Discussion was on dealin~ with the Rum Piver Crossing in a More general concept at this time and whether or not the Motion should contain a con- tin~ency" "r, Pedepenny explained that Andover will be reviewing the grade approval plans. -- ~ Pe~ul"r City Council Heetin~ ?lTovember IS, 1977 - Hinutes T"'l~e 3 (Dum Ptvl3r Crosstnp., Continued) qe ~uar~nteed that rtnythtn~ p'oing through the public hearing, if the City of Andover does not concurJ the project will not be done, After the Public Hearing, the City will be nntifiert by the ~etrn~olitan Council that they are reviewing it, and the City will be Rsked if it concurs with th~t location. The location and design report will also go t"rnugh a nublic hearing and need the same approval as the PD'I, which points the specific location.. ~he City nf Andover will be working with the County through the entire process, Ms, Sonsteby objected to the proposal extending the road through the middle of her property. 'fro Pedepenny felt that ~roviding access to pound Lake Boulevard can be written in the PDR and will do what be can to get this done, Councilþersons Orttel and L~chinski withdrew the Second and the ~!otion. MO~TO~ by VanderL~an, Seconded by Lachinski, that the City Council, City of Andover, a~rees to the concept of a Rum niver Crossing as earlier stated by Resolution of the City Council and agrees with the County to cooperate in the site selection because the City Council recognizes it is the County's intention to hold Public Hearings and significantly involve Andover in the formulating of the final scope, desi~nJ and location. It is of narticular concern to the Council that the funding of the improvement of the connecting rnartway sectton to County Poad 9 be included in preliminary plans for seeking funds, Motion carried un~nimously.. ?rRirie Road Penort !ir, Stockwell reviewed his letter of November 1O, 1977, explairingthe cost overrun for earthwork on the Prairie Road Project. In Barnes Polling Oaks, Second Addition, 148th L.qne, the annroach had to be built up approximately 7 feet to meet Prairie Poad because the streets were accented before the elevations were done on Prairie Rodd.. It was a timing nroblem as to when the plat wes filed and when the roads would be built, Since annnovel was given and the roads in Barnes Rolling Oaks were built first, IT, Stockwell believed it wasino longer the developer's responsibility to redesign the plat; but it is the City's obli~ation to align the street to Prairie Road, This amountert to 3,500 addi- tional cubtc yards, I Another reason for the earthwork overrun was 12 additional driveway accesses were added, amountinp; to 2,500 cubic yards of fill, Original plans provided for 7 driveways, The majority of the~ were to '!r, Holasek's fields to make it easier for him to cross the road with his equipm~nt, Some of his equipment has non-rubber tires and the driveways were made for the leQst amount of travel on Prairie poad -- to minimize the inconvenience of getting the equipment across and to protect the blacktop serface, ,~. Holasek explained he asked for no more driveways than was showing on the plans, The only exception is that two were moved so they were directly across from the other side of the road for safety and minimum traffic on the road itself, Discussion was on how many driveways the final nl~ns showed, asl ~r, Stockwell recalled that not all of the 9 driveways for ~T, Holssek were shovm, !'~'I Stockwell also noted where the other 4 drivew~ys were located, Hr. Stockwell continued another reason for the earthwork overrun was that the estimated arn0unt of unsuit8ble common excavation was low. In thIs esse, the amount of unsuitable material that couldn't be used in the road construction exceeded the estimate by 3,500 cl1bi.c y~rds.. Hr~ Stockwell explained in detail how the muck, subgrade, and common ex- cavatton esttm~tes are arrived at and why the estimates were low for this project, Also tòe amount of to~ soil that had to be removed before the road was built exceeded the estimate by l,onO cubic yards, HoweverJ because more was stripped than was anticipated, it didn't have tó be replaced; therefore, it didn't affect the cost too much, - Pe7,ul.9.""" r.i ty S:ouncil 'M'eetinfš "'J'ovember lr:;, lq7? - "!inutes T".qp,P. If (Pr~irie Po~d Peport, r;ontinued) Tn Sl1m!!'l:1ry, Mr, Stockwell stated there was 12,000 cubic yards of unanticipated fill ~deftcip.ncy on the TIroject (compacted fill) and 15,000 cubic yards had to be bought from outside sources. ~he 3,000 cubic yards difference is the normal loss during construction d11e to compaction. Summarizing the project costs, the total of the Prairie Poad Project is now esttmated to be ~274,hOO, of which ~252,OOO is eligible for MSAB funding. In reviewin~ theð.ndover ">~C:;A'q' f11nd, Mr. Stockwell estimated there will be a balance of ~82,OOO once Prairie uoad is completed, which would be adequate for the final bituminous surface in lQ7R and for tbe brido;es to be built in 1978 or whatever other projects the City wishes to cl')nsi.der. ~here will not be enou~h money to complete the southern portion of Prairie Do~ð next ye~r RS it will be more expensive because of the existin~ housing there. Mr, Vasma felt the City could be pm-chasin..; the rio;ht of ways on the southern portion of Pr~i,..te Po~d at thiF'J time so that could be com~leted before construction be~ins on it. qP' Qlso R'I~~8sted if the ~ouncil desires to construct the southern portion noxt yc~r, the r:ity can hond and nay it Off by takin..; a portion of the funds each year to pay the bond 'h~cl..c. ^.s f~r aA the ineli~ible costs on Pr~irie Poad are concerned, Mr. Kasma was of the 0rtnion the only lo~ical w~y for the City to recover those costs would be to assess it back to the Bbuttinf'; nronerty. Mr. Kasma stated he will review other possibilities as well ~nd report b~ck to the ~ounctl with his reco~rnendation. Wi. nslO1.'l 'tfolnsel<-. 11 ¡:¡q Andover Boulevard "'p1,r - was opposed to the project from the very be~inntn~. "e felt he tried to cooperate with the City in any way he could to bold down costs and resented bein~ m~de the "scapegoat" for these extra costs. He was sure his 9 ñrtveways were shown on the ori~ínal plans. The Council proceeded with the project on the engineer's statement that there would be no problem starting on both ends of the road even if construction couldn't be done on his portion right away, He felt if he had been ~iven a fair settlement for his trees in the beginning, the extra legal costs would not bave occurred as that money for the settlement would have come out of State Aid funds, Mr. "olasek asked wbo is going to stand the cost for putting blacktop on the portion of roads in Barnes Second Addition. Mr, Stockwell stated the developer will, He put two 1 ncnes of ~lass 5 on the end portion when they were completing the road; the City put b~ck the two inches when we raised the road; now the developer is responsible for the reMaintnE; two inches of ~lass 5 and the bituminous work on 148th Lane, 'T, "olasek continued, he did not allow the ouick-taking of his property because he had ~s~ed the ~ouncil ~ nuestion with re~ard to asseSsMents back to the property owners on Urairie poad. ~he day after he received that answer he contacted tbe Attorney to give nermtssicn for the r.ity to enter. He thought it was two or three weeks later when the contractor returned after that point. , D()hert ~ch()wp-. 20 ^.ndover 110ulevard "';1'1 - asked a serie s of questions' in which Hr, ~t0c~well ~nswered: twelve soil borino;s were taken along the total length of Prairie . ' Poqd; mhe ori~ln~l road w~s surveyed before ~l~ns were drawn up for the new road; and In nrder to maintai~ a 50-mtle-per-hour speed desio;n on Prairie Road, the area at 148th Lane had to bp. filled which was known while the final plans were being done, Mr, Schowe then stated, o;iven all this information, he didn't understand why there should be a cost over- run. ?1r. 'KaSMq ~xplai,ned the cost overrun was because of the existing road we had to tie tnto, not on Prairie Poad i_ tself . mhe majority of the overrun CA.me fror.1 changes during construction, things found out while difiging up the soil; things that cannot be predicted, , When constructin~ the southern portion of Prairie Poad, l~r. Kasma stated b"3.sed on this exnerience, additional au~ntities will be ~dded to make sure there is enough money inlthe initial bud~et. I nick .~ch,"e~ questtoned the en..;ineering job on this project, Mr, Kasma explained that tbe 20 to 25 percent shrinkage factor was used in this project, 1''hen the project bagan, it was fOllnd that the soil was too silty to use in the roadway construction. Twin City rpesti nR;' "[.'3.S broug-ht h'3ck out and special testing was done to see if the compaction w~s -- -- - ~ T)e~ul.qr r.i ty (jouncjl "1eetin~ ~T()ve1'!!ber I?, lq77 - 'vTi..nutes Pa1!e S (Dr~tri..e T10ad "OcP0rt, ~ontinued) more th~n ?S nercent, Rnd they still said no. rIa thema tically, the project wor~ed out very well, but tbe dirt was not good enough to give a good road bed, Discussion continued on where the fill was needed on the roadway, which dirt couldn't be used for road construction, and the lose of fill due to shrinkage, This item was continued to :the next re(';ularly sc~ert111ed ~eettn~ when ~xn~ will have a reco~mendation for covering the City's cost on t~e T1roject. fIr. ~olasek stated the residents should be informed if this is going to be dtscussed. H-'lyor 1',rindsc hi.tl felt this mi~ht be able to be included in the Newsletter betng sent Otlt befo~e the next ~ouncil meetin~. ~en-m1nute recess at q:49 p~m. H~A.P T1es1.l?nations Yr, qtockwell reviewed his letter of November 10, 1977, on the MSA~ Road system in the ~ity of ~ndover, Tn the annual certification of mileage for the City, Mr, Stockwell noted that currently the City has 15,32 miles dedicated and approved and another 1,5 mile section of I~A~ should he dedicated by December 1 so the City can start drawing funds on it in 1070. Mr. ~tockwell reported the P.oad Committee has endorsed the extension of ganson ~oulevard from Bunker Lake Boulevard to ~ounty 18 either at the ~ity naIl or Nightengale, ~he p ~ Z has also agreed with that choice, The problem with that choice, however, is th.~t it is .4 miles more than we can designate this ye~r; therefore, another designated section of MSAq road would have to be eliminated, Mr. 'q('Jlasek, Chairman of the Poad Committee, reported that the ~ommittee unanimously su!morted the ~anson Boulevard extension even though they were aware that should the C:onnty bnUd that road, it would remain a !'unicipal State Aid ~ighway if the City acquired the ri~ht of way with ?-fS.z\'q funds. If the road was built in this way, Mr, Stockwell was not ~l1re whether the ~ounty or the City would be required to maintain the road. Hr. ~tockwell also stated thts designation can be moved and/or changed any time prior to actual const,..nction of the roadw,sy shouJd sometht¡; be worked out with the County on this n,'1.!"ttc1l1ar stretc~ of Ranson 'tioulevard. M'()'T"TO"'T 11y ~"'c!;lure, ~econded by Lachinski, that the Andover City Council apply for additional State Aid mileage for the projected Hanson Boulevard from Bunker Lake Boulevard to terminate on ,the north end of County Road 18 and deleting 1/2 mile of 169th, known as MqA~ 109, Motion c~rried unanimously. M0TTO~ by Vander~aan, Seconded by McClure, that the Council handle merely Items 5d, 6d, 9b, and 10a, and, that the City Council adjourn the regular Council meeting to ~ovember 16, at 7:30 p,m, at the City Hall, Discussion was on what items the Attorney and the Engineer needed to be present for. Attorney ~awkins cannot be in attendance on November 16, but be would try to have someone from the firm attend. Mr, Stockwell indicated he would be in attendance. V()~" ()'! Hr1'1'JI)'!: Y~S-Lachinski, McClure, VanderLaan, Windschitl; NO-Orttel '""Ötion carried. ~asement A~TIrovals , 11nf "lTn~ by Vanderh'1.an, ~econded by McClure, offering a Resolution approving easement accuisitions for Itòe 1077-1 ~treet and Storm Sewer Construction (Kenneth Oja, Plat 68111, Parcel 1400, ~364,80). (See Pesolution "132-7) Hotion carried unanimously, I ~h~ñe f "Ire~ PrneraM ~Dnlication "s. Ltndcuist explained the Pesolution figures are based on Council approval to submit CETA ':!:pnlicatio!1s, on auproval of C~TA funding for additional personnel, and on the approval of ef'1uinment. ~he other fi(';ures are based on budget figures with nO funding, This does not - ~ -" Pe~ulRr ~ity Council "·~eetinp-;' ~Tovem'her 1 C:;, lq77 - Hi.nutes P.qr;8 h (qh~~e ~ree Pro~ram ^þplic~tion, Continued) CI')f!!"11tt th~ t;ity to f1nthori.zi.np, the C"P.'T'A nroe;ram. Councilperson Lachinski stated Ms. Lin1nu;st hes also prepared application for the P3E ~rant, and the Road Improvement ~ommtttee is ready to discuss this in len"th in terms of the entire program, The Poad ComMittee is now of the opinion we shoWd be talking about three CETA employees in- stead of two, ~his Shade Tree Disease program should be applied for now or there is a chan"e of not ~etting it at all, HnmT()'T by 0rttel, ,1)econded by Hcr::lure, offering the Resolution, approving the Shade Tree Control nud~et for the 1978 fiscal year, (See Resolution R133-7) !lotion carried unaniMously. Conncilperson TAchinski requested the discussion on this be continued until to~orrow evenin~. qvstems Staternent/ryevelonment r,ui.de ~mendnent Attorney 'f,,-wkins stated he has reviewed and agrees with the document prepared by the Metropoli.tan ~ouncil which, in essence, is a withdrawal of the City's appeal proceedings in front of the Land ¡¡se ~4dvisory Committee on 'Tovember 16 and is stating our considerations rer;qrdin~ pOþ'llrrtion fi~res é'\t the Hearing held on ~Jovember 17. He felt the airport would not be é'\" problem after the ~e3ring on NoveMber 30; and in reviewin~ the law and the plan, he felt there is no legel significance attached to the projected population fi.!"ures. 1~e s~w not~in~ i.n our Systems StateMent th~t would be an attempt to limit us to the 1?,300 populatton fif'ure, ~here i.s more than enou~h sewer capacity to handle the neoT:'\le. It -:1.8 ;,,\ projection only and in no \':ay tries to put legal restraints on the City. l\IfAYl"'rr 1~!inrlscni.tl st,"3.ted t'he q,C)()() fi~ure is more significant right now with the threatened l~"'~jUit by p,,:,~ .1.~.qtngt Pi~Aeye beca_use they do not comply with pollution standards. '1"here !TI~y be A.n out!'i~ht cutbqck of capacity for everyone. If the population goes over O,I:::!l", the pi.~e has t~e ca~~city, but Pi~seye mi~ht not have. I's, Lindquist explained tne ~i.ty has until Dece~ber ~ to nresent \'œitten Material on our population projections; 'howeve"", Ahe is lookin~ for specific data and documentation to verify the City's pro- jeotions, Discussion was on the si~nificance of the Vetro Council's population projections (12,300) versus what the!City feels will be the "rojected population t15,OOO), Hr. Hawkins again stated the proner procedure would be to p,o through the Hearing on the 17th which deals solely with þo~ul~tion issues. He also stated this is a factual hearing in nature and will not deal with philosQPhical reasons for limiting growth or what the City would like to h~ve out here, After the Systems St~tement is amended with the new projected population fi~upes and with the deletion of the north airport site, the City can then gothrough the entire ap~e~l p~ocess a~ain if it wants to. I "omTO~ by Orttel, Seconded by VcClure, that the City Council, City of Andover, enter into él St1.,!"ulation A.~reer.1ent with the !·!etropolitan Council regarding the population forecast and the North Search 4rea for the airport and authorize the Mayor to execute the same, niscl1ssion: Gouncilnerson Lachinski felt there should be an attempt to get information to the ~lerk on 'these nO"9ulation projections. Councilporson VanderLa.an sug,~csted the , wrttten testimony tobe submitted on population figunes by December 8 be prescnted to the ~()11ncil nri.or to' th::!.t date. Matton carried unaniMously. I ~ity Insl1.,..Qnce ! . . I Hr. 'Tewell r,heste~ exnlained some of the problems and changes in the City's insurance, The~e was a nrobleM with the law enforcement contract betvæn the City and the County wtth re~a~d to the Dersonal injury area. Vr. Chester has talked with the County and ~ Pep,'u1A.!" r;i ty r;ounc{l !':eetin~ 'f-.Tovember 15, 1977 - ~·!inutes Pa~e 7 (City Insurance, Continued) 'hr\S received an agreement with them to take the liability off the City of Andover and to TI3S8 it b~ck to the County. ~e has also contacted the ~ounty's insurance carrier to add the City of Andover as an insured to their police professional liability policy, ?~. Chester then explained that the Council can elect to add Public Official Liability tn their insurnnce contrRct to protect officials when sued individually. Mr. Chester went on to exnl~in SOMe of the increases in the insurance þre~iums. ~he umbrella policy had to incre0se the li~bility coverage from ~300,OOO to ~500,OOO because it is requested hV the rei.nsurance c~rriers. He alsn stated that workme~'s cOMþens~tion will probably he 1.!1cre~sin~ fl)T the City because of the -proposed new positions such as the Fire nen'1r'tMent, Public l'rnrI>;:s 1')ep:'1rtMent, status of personnel, etc. ~e als~ noted that there ~re fewe~ ~nd fewer ~o~n~ntes wrttin~ Municipality insurance, and he may be corninß back t'hA be.o;tnn;.n~ of !lext ye:1.r with sugr.-estions on cutting- down the cost of iYlGurance, possibly 101")1-6 n!\ in to Aelf-insl1r.!'tnce. 'T)-fSC'lssi.on w!"J.s t~-'1t nn nep,:0tlations with other com"!lanies h8.S been done. Councilperson 0rttel stRted tñere are few comnanies who yœite munici~ality insurance, and those that an "'1.ye A';on~ un subst~nti:111y. ',~lìrrT()1<T 'hy ~·~c!;lure, Seoonded by Orttel, th,'lt the Andover City Council approve r-~r. Chester's ~·¡rit1.n,<; of a Public Offlcial Liability Policy as quoted by the Forum. Insurance Company. Motton carried 11n~nirnous1y. !·~eetinf,' é1.djourned at 11:20 P.m.. °esnectfully GUbmitted, ~~~,:~ I vi) 11 ~·I!"-3rr. Let A. Pe:"!.c h Pecordin~ Secretary L "" vi- ('\, ~ {r" Gpr ',/1