The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPH September 18, 1975 / /' '~ '- , '-.../ -..-~ ! CITY 01 ANDOVER .,....----'. PUBLIC HEARrnG (75-5) - SEPTEMBER 18, 1975 '~ MINUTES Pursuant to no ice published thereof, a Public Hearing covering storm sewer improvement nd street construction for the area known as "Green Acres", as outlined un er ,M. S. A. 429, was called to order by Mayor Richard J. Schneider, September 18, 1975, 7:30 P.M., at the Andover Community Center, 1685 Crosstown Bo levard N. W., Anoka, Minnesota. Councilperson present: Hola sek, Rither, Vander Laan, Windschitl Councilperson absent : None Also present: City Attorney, William G. Hawkins; City Engineer, D. R. Kasma; City Administrator, Norman J. Werner; City Building Official/ Zoning Administrator, Walter L. Arntzen; City Clerk/Treasurer, P.K. Lindquist; and approximately 35 residents from the Green Acres Area. Engineer Kas a explained in detail, the letter dated August 26, which had been sent to the property owners in the proposed improvement area (Exhibit "A ", attached). Items covered ere 1')' type of construction, 2) costs, 3)benefits now and in the future, and 4) manner f assessment. r"-, \...---1 The Council po ed the following questions: Mayor chneider - Asked jf there was any chance of getting this project completed this fall; and noted that some of the ditches , were put in when Mr. Menkveld developed the property. , , Engine r Kasma - Stated that the project could be completed yet this fall, except for the clean~up. Council erson RitheF - Asked the earliest starting date jf the project were ordered now; and noted that the streets in the Green Acres Areá were constructed without the supervision of an engineer;and asked if any of the Class 5 could be saved when the sanitary sewer improvement was put in. Engineer Kasma - Stated that the project could start November 15; and that approximately one half of the Class 5 could be salvaged. Council erson Holasek _ Asked if there was any clay in the area; and if the water running into the streets would cause the surface to wear away. Enginee Kasma - Noted that there might be :s.ome clay; and that a little gravel would wash away, but the grading should handle it. ,.-.., [ ; ~ The hearing wa then turned over to the residents for their questions and comments. (Staff response are shown in parentheses.) ;/ /""" /-., ../ ~~ ~' Public Hearing - September 18, 1975 Minutes - Pag 2 ~ '- David Polke - 3004 l43.nd Lane N. W. Asked if it ould cost more to install the sanitary sewer and storm sewer as separate pr jects; and noted that this year was an unusual year for flooding, etc., and th s was the first time that he had ever had water in his basement; and that he id not feel that ditches would solve the problem. (Dewey Kas a - Yes, it would be more expensive to do the storm sewer and sanitary se er as separate projects. ) Herb Loren - 3030 l42nd Lane N. W. Asked why e people on Ivywood were not included in the project inasmuch as some of the ater that was causing the problems did come from their lots; and who would k ep the proposed ditches clean. Noted that his drainfield was in the lowest a ea and yet he had never had a problem. Felt that sanitary sewer and storm s wer should be done at the same time. (Dewey Kas a - The people on Ivywood did not have a problem and would not benefit from the project; and that the City would keep the ditches open. ) "~ Suggested r ning a culveJ:t-ditch between parcels 6260 and 6660 and from .~ there drain" g down to the creek. Proposed t t the Council "sit" on the storm sewer project for awhile and then do sanitary ewer and storm sewer at the same time. (Councilpers n Holasek - I would like to see both put in at the same time, but there seems to be no time set. ) (Walter Arnt en - Two years ago when it was first brought up, everyone opposed sanitary sew r-this spring again, everyone opposed it; I believe that if the storm sewer and sanitary sewer were proposed together for this hearing, everyone would have a ain opposed it. There are septic systems in the area that cannot be repaired. John Noa;rd - 14126 Heather Street N. W. Stated that h felt that the septic systems failures were the fault of the installing contractor a d the water table was not the contributing factor. Asked what good the ditches ould do along his back property line when his yaædwas 4 - 5 feet higher, caus ng the ditch to be at least 6 feet deep; and the only reason the water sits ·no is because the ditches are full. Stated that he would not give ,~ any easemeri s for ditches because he did not feel they would do any good. - Questioned e possibility of a closed system and the costs; and stated that he believed the oads were Class 5 right now. -; / /"" ~, Public Hearing - =eptember "./, 1975 ~ Minutes - Page - '-' (Dewey Kas a - The elevations were shot and the ditches would be no-where near 6' deep A closed system would not help the ground water and would cost approximate y $64,500.) Asked when he sanitary sewer would be going into Northwood Addition and possibly Re Oaks 1st; and if a different type of storm sewer system would be installed f the sanitary sewer and storm sewer were done at the same time. (Dewey Kas a - If the petitions come in as information has they will-it could be next spr" g. If you are interested, the petition should be in by November 1, as we can u ually gehbetter bids in the spring when the contractors are looking for work; an the storm sewer system would probably be the same even if the sanitary se er were put in at the same time. ) Mr. Abbott 2917 l42ndLane N. W Stated that h believed the water was coming in through the basement floor rather than he walls, which would mean a high water table; and that he did not feel that this system would help the flooded basements unles s the ditches were below e basement level. Asked why a temporary solution could not /"" be a City fin nced project. '~ (Dewey Kas a - With a City as large as Andover, there is no way that this could be don - if it were the taxes would go out-of-sight. The Council does not feel it to be fair for someone in the northern part of the City to pay for something b nefitti'1J;g only those in the southern part, and vice-versa. ) Kim Mahrer - 2939 l42nd Avenue N. W. Noted that h had had water in his basement since April, and that the water is not coming rough the walls, but rather the floor; and that he will have to do work on his asement regardless of whether the storm sewer goes in or does not. Asked hy the City had not maintained the ditches up until now; and that he did not u erstand chargingt<!>c1ean out the ditches now, then later on paving the streets a d eliminating the ditches. Also noted that 90% of the ditches proposed we e already in existence. (Dewey Kas a - This is true, however, someday you will have to do what we are prop sing; and the work done now will not be wasted.) Arlene Preb e - 2949 - l42nd Lane N. W. ~ Stated that ey have had their basement tiled and yet the water still comes through the f oor; and that this happened even with a crack all the way across - the wall, the efore, it is not surface water coming in and a storm sewer would not he p, and that they pumped out as much as 3,000 gallons of water in one day. , , ,-- '- Public Hearing - September 18, 1975 Minutes - Page ...-----~ - (Dewey Kas a - By pumping this water out, you are just re,-cycling.i~,,~,It does not sol e the problem by pumping it, out on to the ground.) John Hibbar - 3015 142nd Lane N. W. Stated that e ditch was re-graded and still did not have any water in it; and that you cou d see the water draining from the west. Suggested putting a culvert acro s Heather Street and letting nature do the pumping. (Dewey Kas a - We have checked this out and it would not be the full solution. ) Jim LaValle - 3025 142nd Lane N. W. Commented hat he felt that the ditches behind him would do no good unless they were 3' - 4' deep-the water is 2' deep in his yar<i!. at times, and yet the present itch is empty. Questioned the proposed drainage and did not feel that it ould help. Also noted that there were two people who would not give eas ments. (Dewey Kas a - If'd{bac.øn-,es absolutely necessary to get easements, the ---- City can go o condemnation of the property, however, this increases the , '~ costs of the roject and all the residents pay for it. ) Kath Norto - 2834 - 142nd Lane N. W. ;3tated that en the project was first proposed they were not affected- they are still not ffected; and asked why they were included. a - If you receive no benefit and your water is not causing a will not be asses sed. ) Commented hat she felt the City made the mistake in the first place by allowing ho es to be built in this area, a.nd therefore, the City should pay to correct th problem. ( Councilpers n Rither - There are many similar situations, and the City just cannot a ford to pay for all the improvements; and if it is done for one it would hav to be done for all. ) nson - 2926 142nd Lane N. W. Stated that ey did have water in their basement and had asked for help- ~, but did not f el that a storm sewer such as the proposed, wa s the answer; , ' and that the ost to each homeowner would -pay for all the pumping that - was ever/ne ded. ~, ' , ~" '~ Public Hearing - September 18, 1975 Minutes - Page 5 , , - 1,-,"" Jan Pasche 2950 142nd Lane N. W. Asked if thi system would have an inlet pipe; and what would happen if the catch basins clog up with sand. (Dewey Kas a - There is an inlet pipe in part of it; and a sump l--r!I would be used to k ep the sand out. ) Stated that erhaps when the economy picture is better, the people would be more recep 've to these improvements. L nn Kalaha - 3014 142nd Lane N. W. Stated that h's system has always been under water, but hasfunctioned very well. cker _ 2927 142nd Avenue N. W. Asked who ould maintain the open ditches in the fields. a - The City.) /"- ----- Suggested a emporary solution in putting a culvert across Heather Street.. 142nd Avenue N. W. Suggested p tting a culvert to the north and cleaning out the existing system. (Dewey Kas a - This could be done if the Council ordered this; and we are proposing to deepen the ditches if the project is ordered. ) Asked for a rice on the "whole package ", i. e., sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and blacktop streets. (Dewey Kas a - If done now, in the neighborhood of $5,000 per lot. ) Dan McIntre - 2939 142nd Lane N. W. Noted that w en the culvert was installed under his driveway, it ran up-hill; and that som driveways had no culverts at all. There is no drainage in the 40 acres beh"nd him and always ponds in the spring. Charles Plo e - 2849 142nd Avenue N. W. ,~, Asked if an hing would be saved by doing the whole thing now; and stated that - - he felt just r grading the streets would be a poor move at this time. ...--, ---" '~ Public Hearing - September 18, 1975 Minutes - Page ~ '~ (Dewey Kas a - We would be able to save all the gravel. It is up to you to decide what you w t to do now. ) David Polke - 3004 - 142nd Lane N. W. Stated that h felt that the Council mist consider what was best for the majorit y; and it appea ed that the majority did not have a problem. (Dewey Kas a - Storm sewers seldom are wanted by everyone; those persons who do not h ve a problem sometimes are the people whose outlaw water is causing the roblem for the others.) (Councilper on Rither - On'May 4, 1971, the Town Board had the opportunity to solve the roblem by not grantëa a ''blanket variance" on your lots. The Planning an Zoning Commission recommended denial of this variance, however, the Town Bo rd did approve it-now, the results have caught up with us. ) Dale Preble - 2949 142nd Lane N. W. Stated that 1 st spring the people were asked to take both sewer and water; and had the t o projects been separate the majority would have wanted the ;---. sanitary se er. ~ (Councilpers n Rither - Although the Public Hearings were held at the same time, the pe pIe could have had either. v Costs were separated ~ each.)~ 'Tho. a.....""',1 . s tif."1 C"--"'*"o"S i. f"ø r, BVf~<>t;:..;.... John Hibbar - 3015 142nd Lane N. W. petitions circulated only asked for an opinion on sewer and water, and did not s y one or the other. Stated that the residents had accepted the fact that sa tary sewer would be coming within five years. Rick Pasche - 2950 142nd Lane N. W. Questioned hy the people at the end of the cuI de sac were not included in the project. (Dewey Kas a - Those persons were not notified, and if any additional are included, th re will have to be a new hearing. ) MOTION by Rith r, seconded by VanderLaan, to close the portion of the Public Hearing which al ows resident input. Motion carried unanimously. Discus sion ensue on 1) draining the problem area to the west, 2) alternate methods I ,--. . 'of drainage, 3) c sts of combining the projects, 4) inclusion of additional benefitted , , - property owners; and the costs if the system was laid out differently to serve more persons, and 4) SA 429 requirements if the project area changed. " /"', ~~, - Public Hearing - September 18, 1975 Minutes - Page , . ~ MOTION by Hol sek, seconded by Windschitl, to continue the Public Hearing to January 20, 197 , 7:30 P.M., Andover Community Center, unless a petition for sanitary sewer i received prior to that date; then an earlier Hearing will be conducted. MOTION AMEN ED by Rither, seconded by Holasek, that such a notice be published in the official ne spaper and include the expanded area and send additional notices to the affected r sidents. Amendment and motion carried unanimously. Hearing continue : 10:35 P.M. ******** A Special Meetin of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Richard J. Schn ider at 10:39 P. M., for the purpose of discussing additional items. Budget Meeting October 2, 1975, 7:30 P.M. set for the date to discuss the 1976 Budget. ~ -A roval of a. ent for Eas ements (75-2) MOTION by Rith r, seconded by Windschitl, to direct the Clerk to prepare the proper resolutio indicating approval of payment for easements on Proje ct 75-2, in the amounts 0 $40.00 each to the following: Larry and arguerite Story John and LaRae Johnson Dennis and oIly Stephens Thomas and Autumn McConville Martin/and arolyn Castle Jeffrey and Judith Rygwall Wayne and arion Walberg Glen and Linda Johnson. Motion carried animously. Adjournment MOTION by Rith r, seconded by Windschitl, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. ¡ I - ~ ,..-/ '......../ -, TE. A Tom, KING, DUVALL,ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED '..,/ ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS ,\ 1408 PIONEER BUILDING ~\ 'if Augu t 26, 1975 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 224-7891 & RICHARD M. BARKER OWEN J. BEATTY CARREL. H. BERKOWITZ ROBERT A. BOYER JAMES C. BROTEN ARNDT J. DUVALl. HUGO G. ERICKSON WILL.IAM J. FEYDER ROYCE B. HANSEN STEPHEN M. HARTL.EY CLIFFORD E. JOHNSON QuWAYNE R. KASMA J. THOMAS KIRK DAVID W. KIRKWOL.C A. DEAN LUNDHOL.M ROBERT T. MAL..ONEY RICHARD C. MENKEN l.EONARD G. MILL.ER WAYNE A. OLSON DUANE T. PREW RUDOLPH p, RAtTOR ROBERTR, RYDER WILLIAM T. SHERIDAN ASE J. SPERLING ARNOL.D M. STEFFES WAL.TER W, THORPE JAMES E. VOYEN NATHAN F. WEBER GEORGE J. SCHROEPFER CL.IFFORD W. HAMBLIN Dear Resident 0 Andover in the Green Acres Area: 0 The City Councí is conducting a Public Hearing on September 18, 1975 at 7:30 PM to discus s the fe sibílity of constJ:ucting storm sewers and improved gravel surfaced streets in the G een Acres Addition, City of Andover. The following in ormation is presented on the proposed project, 1. Wh is a S orm sewer s stem necessar ? The probl m of storm water runoff must be faced in every area which undergoes developme t into home sites. Prior to development, surface runoff presents few problems, But as gJ:owth occurs, the surfac;:e topography is changed and natural drainage ays are altered or blocked. Driveways, streets. the roofs of buildings and other ai)made structurli's increase :the amount of runoff. Rainfall which , may have vaporated or soaked away previously, now runs off and settles ìn 10- I calízed ar as. , i In the Gre n Acres ~dditiont the lack of storm drainage facilities has caused sewage disposal faílures,and also caused the ground water table to rise re. i s ultil1g in et basem<¡>nts for many houses i:p the area, 2. What e osed? ,r---, The reco mended storm sewer system consists of a combination of open ditches , , round storm sewers to provide a permanent storm drainage system ~ and under for the Gr en Acres Area. The propos,¥,! plan is shown on the attached Figure No, 5 "Re ommended Storm Sewer System", ,.". I , ~ '--. -' --- ~- -- ,- Residents August 26, 1975 Page Two The proposed shallow open ditch between Ivywood Street and Heather Street Northwest ill provide needed surface drainage to eliminate standing water in individu 1 sewage disposal system locations. The proposed open ditch (3-4 foot d pth) through the undeveloped area between Heather Street NW and Dahlia Street NW will provide an outlet for the entire area. A future pond could be c nstructed in the same general location as the proposed ditch, The propo ed underground pipe system on Heather Street NW from a point 350 feet so th of l42nd Avenue NW to l42nd Lane NW will provide needed outlet for oth l42nd Avenue NW and l42nd Lane NW~ Open ditches (5-6 feet depth) in this area would be too deep to be acceptable in a residential area~ The proposed storm sewer system would best be used by the improvement /~ of existing street drainage. This can be done by regrading ditches to "clean '--' up" the bo levard or by lowering the street and eliminating the ditches and culverts al ng the street. We have prepared separate preliminary cost esti- mates for 1) the lowering of the street and (2) the regrading of the street ditches, 3. What t e f street construction is ro osed for our area? The street reconstruction would include establishing the proper street grade for urban t pe streets including curbs, excavating the existing dirt streets to a 32 foot w dth at proper grade to provide surface storm drainage, place 32 foot wide 4 inch thick gravel surfacing. 4. Wh install storm sewers and im rove the streets when ublic sanitar sewer !!l.3!:X be ins alled within several ears? The proposed storm sewer will help solve the problem of the individual sewage disposal systems and will be needed in the future after public water and/ or sanitary se er has been installed, To make the proposed storm sewer effective it will be n cessary to at least regrade the ditches and adjust culverts. Rathe r than spend ime and money to redo the ditches that effect could be used to im- prove the a ea by reconstructing the streets to provide the same surface drainage. ¡---, The only " asted" cost would be the loss of gravel when public facilities are in- ,- stalled and at that time provisions would be made to salvage as much gravel as possible du ing construction op=ations. ~ ~ ~ Residents August 26, 1975 Page Three 5. When will ublic water and/ or sanitar sewers be installed in our area? The install tion of public water and/ or sanitary sewer in your area will be based on r quests by property owners or by the need for the Council to pro- vide sanita y conditions in the event numerous individual sewage disposal systems fa'l in your area.. The Counc 1 has ~ time schedule proposed for installation of public water and/ or san'tary sewer in your area at this time. 6, What is th osed time schedule to install the ro osed storm sewers and reconstruc streets? The earlie t possible date to complete the storm sewer system is late fall or early winter. T is would provide relief in the spring when r'unoff and water problems ,~-.. are most s vere. The street reconstruction could be accomplished in the spring ------ of 1976. 7. What ste s are necessar et the work done? The follow'ng steps necessary for the completion of the project: A. City C uncil hold Public Hearing Sept. 18, 1975 B. City C uncil orders project, authorizes Engineer to prepare plans and specifications Sept. 18, 1975 C. Engin er submits plans for Council approval, and r ceives authorization to advertise for bids Oct. 15, 1975 D. City C uncil receives bids and awards contract Nov. 4, 1975 E. Contr ctor begins construction Nov. 15, 1975 F. Contr ctor completes storm sewer construction Dec. 31, 1975 G. Contr ctor completes street reconstruction July 1, 1976 H. City E gineer prepares final cost estimates and a sessment roll July 1, 1976 I. City C uncil conducts assessment hearing, any e rors or adjustments in assessments are made at this meeting. August 1, 1976 J. City C uncil passes resolution accepting assessment r 11 and directs Clerk to file with Anoka County ,~. A ditor before October 15, 1976 September 1, 1976 /-~\ - - / -- Residents August 26, 1975 Page Four 8. How much will the storm sewer and street reconstruction cost me? We have p epared preliminary cost estimates for construction of the storm sewer system an the bituminous streets. These costs are as follows: Storm Sew r Construction $30,000 Street Rec nstruction 35,700 Street Ditc Regrading 13,000 The entire cost of each of these improvements is proposed to be assessed against the benefit d properties. Streets are assessed on an adjusted front footage basis to all abutt'ng properties. Adjusted front footages will include provisions for corner lot and irregular shaped lots. Based on t e preliminary cost estimate of $35,700 and a total front footage of 6600 feet t e front foot assessment for street would be $35,700/6600 FF or $6.60 ,--., per front fat. , ,--/' Storm sew rs are assessed on a square foot basis. The boundaries of the drainage area are d termined and each lot within those boundaries is assessed for each square foo of area draining into the system. Based on the preliminary cost estimate 0 $30,000 and a total benefited area of 970,0.00 square feet the assess- ment would be $30,000/970.000 SF or $.031 per square foot. The assess ent for an average lot 110 feet in width by 167 feet deep, whích drains entirely int the storm sewer system would be as follows: Street Con truction - 1l0'x $6.60 per foot = $ 726,00 Storm Sew r Construction - 18,370 SF x $.031 per SF c " 570.00 Total $1,296.00 ,~, - , I i -' j ,~ -' ~, Residents August 26, 1975 Page Five Assessme ts can be paid in full, or paid on an installment basis with property taxes over a 10 or 15 year period. The annual charges, based on a $1,296.00 assessme and 80/0 annual interest, would be as follows: Year 10 year assessment 15 year assessment 1977 233.28 190.08 1978 222.91 183.17 1979 212.54 176.26 1980 202.18 169.35 1981 191.81 162.43 1982 181. 44 155.52 1983 171. 07 148.61 1984 160.70 141.70 1985 150.34 134.78 , , 1986 139.97 127.87 , , _/ 1987 120.96 1988 114.05 1989 107.14 1990 100. 22 1991 93.31 9. ro'ect at this time? The constr ction iI1dustry prices have continued to rise in the past years, and the outlook is for continued higher prices. The Engineering News Record Cost Index, which is a national publication that indicates cost trends in construction, lists the fo lowing increases in recent years based on $100.00 worth of construction in 1965: Year Base of $100.00 Percent increase per year 1965 $ 100.00 1966 103.87 3.9 1967 108~90 4.8 1968 116.07 6.6 1969 127.64 10.0- ,---. 1970 136,60 7.0 ! 1 1971 1-52.98 12.0 - 1972 173.74 13.6 1973 190.84 9.8 1974 202.19 5.9 ~ ~ '- - , '.. Residents August 26, 1975 Page Six If a projec is needed. it is reasonable to proceed with the project as soon as pos sible to obtain the benefit of the improvement since the interest at 8% will probably b less than the annual increased construction cost. As your Ci y Consulting _Engineers, we hope this letter answers some of your questions r egarding this proposed street project. Very truly yours, TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED /-......... ~~~ ;DRK:vlo '-..../ Enclosure cc: Mrs. Patri ia K. Lindquist, City Clerk-Treasurer Mr. Walter Arntzen, Building Official Andover Ci y Council ('-- , , 1 r 1'_" L,./-/ t /y, r r' ., I ß7' ^ 't ',::-- .. " \ ' ~ I~,::::-:;, \'/[" I ";----" , . < " . ' , I ,ä" · " " , I: ~"" ~.. '" /,..,-'-, " ' ! . Þ. '... ø'\' ~",,' --..,"', \ £' , -Ø \ ~ '''' r+ '-" ~ ,.. ' , " ." .' . ,,' , ¿ ~~ " ~ 0 ' " \' . \- ~-'.';).',~ \ ' '" - ", .,"" " :;....--- . \ \;), ' ~ . <¡",,, ,.:'<,;' .. " ,,,"_.. ' H" < ," cY/" ,., "",_. ~ ' . "I 1 . ~,y "'I, ,,'.' '~,"'>'<," <',' .,. ... ., .' '\ 0" -«/ _ " . .' . ,,'"'' .' o' ' , · I I ", /ø-:;/ ' ;:\,'..:",:,~\( '1::;\" ~:~-i"~, ~ ~.~. ~' ~- ~.... ~' "I ' ~ 1 ./^~ r '" ' ,c" '. ,\',' ~ ~'- .. \ . '. ,," . ," . " ." ,,' ; i ' ' ,,'r '..'. < '. \.." ~ 0 ' \ ~ - , ,L-" \.1>',' C5' ?' "~\ . ~ ~. " . 0 . . ,,' . .' , A' · ,'.... .:;,,' ".. ;<,,' \. "" , _...-: '" ,< '. ~ -t.', ,";' ' '/ V. '" , '". <., ~" 0" -"':',.~_r"..~' "'/'^"'~ , , "1"" '" ' , ' /,,", H, .. ' ~.' ,1', .' I~".", .' 6;. ': , ,,','-'" Ð'-~.. t"or.. "'~ ~ , /, ._ /'.,J." _ Y. -'-"'f/" . . 'i """14""'1."="-'",' n ' " r.'.....' 0' -liB ",; " ..' , '> ' , ' .¢- . . () 'o?2 Íi",:/ ' <ð'" ; ~f 't, , , ~. '. ,~... '''' " ' y =-C:, >" .', ,; '" ." "-" ,,' t" ;, ~ ¡ <. '''--' ..,,' ~ '. ",.,., ,"'- ", ~ ,~", "'- ...... _,._ ,'" ,,~' '- "....,'l ··,p"0...· , ~, ~ 'i'.c ' ::-- \ '- ,; "",,' ~ '- ' " ","'. ...." ><' , ~ ,.. < " '" \Ii /~, i '" ' V~' !. I' ''''- ' "~ ,..../ ,~, 11'" .. / .. ,'.~ /J~ ~. ~ 0, ." . '- ,p f" ,~ ,,__ ' ",' ' ,C' "'--, 'k" ~" ~ ~ " ,'~ ~~iP.«O' .....'~ ' '.,. "'.'~, ,,'" ::-- I ~ w ~. .~r-ci-tI;-'~4\ , '0. "'- ,," '" ,.' "", ~ '¡", "", , ",' ~, "," ' . ,., H' I ~ ':. .. " '! ~ ' "'- ' " "I ii" Q 1_ ~ \' 1 ~ ..- /~.f' ~: ;;'-"'<::"~ ~i"~ ; n -T ,," " ¡;,~ ' I . /( , T no. _...' _ /"., ' ", ¡;; r", :Y: ", ,"'ZM':.' ' ~ --- 600' .""hi /':>,,, ,,' I .v.-';f. D <:.nd .. 4O'ffi. "/1/, ",' , .. C/" ~ ' , : '_'-1"\- ' './,..... .... - -' . - , , ,_ ", ............' . Pr, ~~.-. V <,0 , ,": 'T ~' I " '" ~'!,//~~ -", -- . " . . . . , . :, ,,' 1- ¿; ,,' / g¡ . ,_ ..;_;. ~ _ :;: --J -/ / - ' ;.... - ):', ~, ,:¡;~ 8) ~ ~ g) 8: t:% ." b ~ ~ õ; ~~~ '"c::200''''~ ".., II:> ,... '" - / ...., '" ~ '" ,~ . ~ ,_ " ~ ~' ~ 2 ':1 ___ , ~?r/ 2- 81, /.A ~ ¡ ~, ' .. '..,_,_ I!"" _ , 'L~ s: .'...t ,= ~';'; '- 7.,- '.. " " ," ,0. 0> :,'l/, ~ !--'--, ., ,I~ c..,,--,,~"O' 'I --J o'Ã" '" = - ii' p,:J,. '- -~, , í=' Q)" . '---. ' èI /,' --J 0, '" r õ; ° . '" = ' '. .." _ ~ s: '" r,. X! . 0" 0 .' r' ,_ _~,' "., c<. · . '.~ I, ~ - ,<, -- ~§L ~ £J' - r~ 'õ; ~'. ;..---" \ .. , . _ .' " ,,- ' ' . '_','" I ",I ~ ~l~ '" - "', U:,.' ';~, õ;" ---' ;0 ~ æ õ I 'J:L._ '.~ 2- 0. ~ ' ~ ê l .'6~ . _ ' ~ ~ ' ~~1P . ~ E!¡' : $ , ' I '" ,:0. ;¡¡ = Õ; ,". ;'. , ._ ." ., 0 o. ." = Õ; ,I ;.... - I :'1;' ~ 8) = 00 Ii - , t; -L0, &:~ I~, ~ " ".,0 ' . ~ 0'" .. , ,. _ ". û o. ' " - " " '.' .. ' . ,", ~ ~ ,,, --J _ ~ _ I,'" cr ~-, · ~: 'S ,~ ," .' .." - ,"" - ' -' .' "1->- . (!> ,,,,'" 0' ",,¡''J <1> ,".' " ~, '. - ' ,. , '.' ' . o. 0, · " ., . " ' .. -" .",. . \.. . r en .... , ...... -, rn I . --J ~,-",~ ' 1· " ~' . _ '.- ",. -' , . I. ,. ' g ,// " ,. ¡:¡ a . > 00.' . 0 · · ! " . c' . ,. '/ g .. . % 0 , ' " , ,0 I! _ I S 1'" ~ ' T11 :'~ , _ ~ '" ,,,' I....,.. . I, I o. . , . , -' ' ' . , " _ ' <0 ë. ~ '" !'I_ _ ~ ð ~ ,~ ..,. - ...,.,---' " " " .. ,; _ .. ~ ,'., " ~ 'è 3' , . . ore" o' '> '0 · L. "" ~ ..I -> "/ - ,~' ' . ~ ._' " . ' c '/ _ - ,~_, 'c. -:, . . _ . ~ ,38" ,'~- 8 õ'''~ '!) - õ; "';'/ ~ --" ,;' _ . ò> .,.. I '" - -oJ ~...., '" . , 0 o. , ~ ,/.' 8 ~ ." ' , ' . ., , ' -" g , . I (j ,- " , ,,_ - 000. 00, · i'" %%" -' .' " " 0 ° /.... ¡;j - <1> r,. ~ ' 'N' ,- ' '" '- '" 'N ~ ~ "" 1> _ _ ,'" , ,/ý 0 ° 'l '" '0 ~ '" ,~ . '" ~ ,'" '-'- '/ - - 5; " ,~ - . "'''' . 0" " Q! " ;. '" , .., 200.., . . ,..', C' , ' '" ' " '" N .. , ' ;Ie" - 2- ~, ,..... ~ ,_ ¡;; '" ~ '/ '/ _200.., ' [., i, o"'?" ~,.. ~ ~ a; ..200_, ,.T -200-,-= , ' '. _ ' . õ ',' -r ..' '\) SII'; i : " IIO! - Q! g)....~ I <:!2 C, '~~~r ~ttA~ ,..'/'/1.' 2 ~{;o, 2- Cé,- . ~, . ~ ~ ,.'", .7. '/%. ' ." ~ .,.",. ,/<' '1'/ i. I 00 ..." · ß ,~\ ". 400 ' , , . ' ~7/ ' I ~'f I · ~ // ¿rl",.",¡ , ~ I : ~. . ~.' , ~ ,.': ~ . ; . '/ I .1 1 .,8 . . . ~ IJ (f) (f) 0 0 â !:)~ 111 -I -f 0 r ::U:P ~ Z :u 0 z 111 ""'.. ." '" '" '" ",.. ~ III ' ' ~ . 1 Ë!! -IT ,i: -I Z en Z ~ \~ , .' " ,'" '" ~, , " '" '~ c" ",0 I ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ !a ,., ~ 1 ' ~þ~ : l:u ~ ~ <nO ~ o,:þ ",,:Þ -<:P ~ _ 'Z <: '-0 en .." , _'"11 (") ~ ~ 10 0 T , -f 1"1 ' I 0 oJ; v, i - ... ~ ' i Ci) > ,0 -I 0 .', ..., I I . i: 0 , !e: 0 - i: ::t z;O: ~ 'I<%;j 0 r ! 0" ; I'" % 0 '-' : ¡" 8 ¡. I~ : .' c' :-- '(" 1 ~ ~ ,.' . I:'. , ' , ,0 0 , ~ " ~ I !" ~ ~ -' ~ . ' . , I, ß "r