Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPH June 12, 1975 I . Cfry of ANDOVER PUBLIC HEARING - JUNE 12, 1975 MINUTES Pursuant to notice published thereof, a Public Hearing on Proposed Storm Sewer and Street Im~rovement in Auditor's Subdivision No. 82, was called to order by Andover City Mayor, Richard J. Schneider, June 12, 1975, 7:35 P. M., at the Andover comtunity Center, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N. W., Anoka, Minnesota. Councilpersons present: Rither, VanderLaan, Windschitl Councilpersonb absent : Holasek, (Arrived 7:55 p. M. ) Also present: City Engineer, D. R. Kasma; City Attorney, Wm. Hawkins; City Building Official, Walter Arntzen; City Clerk, Pat Lindquist; Reporter, Shirley Hatfield; and approximately 75 residents. er briefly outlined events leading up to the ordering of the Public City Council at the May 6, 1975 Meeting. The Hearing as then turned over to City Engineer, D.R. Kasma. Mr. Kasma read a letter to a suburban City Council from an attorney, regarding "Storm Drainage" ( ibit "A" attached). A letter dated June 12 from T.K.D.A., sent to the residen s with the Notice of Hearing, was read and thoroughly explained by Mr. Kasma ( xhibit "B" attached). It was noted by the engineer that an assessment policy had not been adopted by the City Council, however, this would be done very soon. H explained that in the case of blacktopped streets, the City guarantees the upkeep on them, and that the residents cannot be re-assessed for at least the length of time on the bonds, whether it be 10 or 15 years; and that a re sident can only be as ses ed once for storm sewer. Residents we e invited to present quèstions and statements. Said testimony as follows. (Sta f responses shown in parentheses. ) G. s - 3629 l43rd Avenue N. W. ormed the Council that a survey had been taken in the area and that th results would be explained and given to the City Council by another r sident. Stated that in daily jogging throughout the area, he had never n ticed any severe ponding on any of the streets in the subdivision. S ggested that a pipe be run straight back from Castle's place into R und Lake. (Dewey asma - The suggestion is fine, but the water would "eat up" the blacktop f the road were graded down to allow the water to run this way; it could be one if the roads were gra.vel and deep ditches were made to allow for the p oper drainage. ) Steven R kkili - 3720 - l43rd Avenue N. W. r,resented petitions covering the residents' opinions on ¡)Storm Sewer nd 2) Blacktop Streets, and indicated the results as follows: Storm Sewer - 52 opposed, 2 favored, and 2 with no opinion. Blacktop - 47 opposed, 9 favored, and 2 with no opinion. "'bli. H...in, f Juno 12, l?75 Minutes - Page 2 Resident Testimony (Continued) I .. Art Speaker - 14346 Woodbine Street N. W. Asked if any effort had been made to see if Federal Loans would be ivailable for this project. (Dewey K sma - None is available for storm sewers or street projects, unless one WOUldl go to a 30-year loan-but then the interest could be prohibitive for a project his size.) I Questioned the engineer on whether or not the blade could ruin the 9urb while plowing; and asked why a definite figure could not be ~iven before the project is ordered, and what would happen if the bid price escalated considerably over the estimate. (Dewey KÅsma - 32 feet are plenty wide for a street, so the blade should have plenty of foom; and the estimates are pretty accurate, and if the bids do come in extremely high as compared to the estimate, the Council could refuse to accept thim. ) sked if the improvement would cause the taxes to go up; and if 1nyone had spoken to his real estate agent advising him that the ity of Andover was going to correct the water problem. (Dewey K sma - Property values do increase somewhat with any improvement, however, not to any great extent. ) LeRoy NO,rdstrom - 3737 - l44th Avenue N. W. tated that he could not afford an increase in taxes c,aused by the ssessment, and wanted to know why something was being done that ould have to be taken up in 4 to 5 years when sewer and water were ut in the area; everything should be done at the same time. (Dewey K sma - The sewer could be 15 to 20 years away; improvements are as case 0 investing money, not losing it. ) sked if a 1 1/2" bituminous surface would be enough to stand up under traffic. Also noted that only two persons were having the bulk of the ater problems, and it was the developer's fault, therefore the other eople should not have to pay for it. (Dewey K sma - 1 1/2 " of bituminous is sufficient for the amount of traffic in that ar a. Only those persons benefiting from the storm sewer will be assessed or same. ) Ann Gallus - 14278 Underclift Street Åsked Mr. Kasma if he had personally viewed the area; and noted t at she had never seen a pond in the area south of l43rd. (Dewey K sma - Yes, I have gone' over the area; and if those residents south of 1 43rd have no problem, this area could be removed from the project.) Mike Yeh e - 3648 - l43rd Avenue N. W. tated that he lives in the area in question, and has never had a proble m_ oth his ya,rd and the street are and have been dry after the last two days f heavy rain. Asked why he had not received a Public Hearing Notice. - Public Hearin~ - June 12, 1 ';J75 Minutes - Pag 3 (Pat Lind uist - The Anoka County Treasurer's Office only shows plat and parcel number, name and address of person or corporation receiving tax statementl If the tax statement goes to the lending institution, only the owner's n~me is listed; we used section maps, phone books and assessment books to lbcate owner's address--<tnd if none could be found, the notice was sent, as i~ your case, to Twin City Federal. ) Åsked if the project had to be done if no-one in the area had problems. (Dewey KÅsma - If the street project were approved, then the storm sewer would go in as planned, if not, parts of the storm sewer could be left out. If the southern part were dropped from the storm sewer project, the cost would drop to approximately $37,000.00, but it is to be remembered that there would I also be less property owners to pay the assessment. ) Rosella slnstebY - 4100 7th Avenu'; N. W. _iuggested running the storm sewer from l44th to Xenia, then south nd making a pond in the low area of Govt. Lot 2; and noted that the kids could use this pond for skating during the winter months. (Dewey Krsma - This is not a permanent solution, and ditches can cause additiona problems. The question also comes up on who is to pay for the project if the siz of the project is reduced too much. ) Iso asked why the Public Hearing Notice included some areas that ould receive no benefit. (William Hawkins - The Public Hearing Notice covers the largest potential area that could conceivably be assessed. ) John Lof trom - 3608 - 144th Avenue N. W. tated that when the question of storm sewer was discus sed first ver a year ago, the residents were told that it could not go into ound Lake because of the water table. (Dewey K sma - We have shot the elevation and it will work. We will be taking ou over 10,000 yards of dirt v.hen we grade down the roads. ) uggested grading down now, so the water would have a place to go. (Dewey K sma - IT we did that before blacktopping, the water would sit in the road.) John Ber y - 3755 - l43rd Avenue N. W. tated that he did not think that 1 1/2" of blacktop was sufficient. everal firms had told him that 2" would be the minimum. Asked hat would be the cheapest way to go on the project. (Dewey sma - Another 1/2" would cost approximately another $1. 00 per foot. Wi h a sand base, there would be no heaving or buckling, therefore, 1 1/2" s ould be sufficient. The only cheaper way to go would be to eliminate the area outh of l43rd, and go to a 20' roadway. ) sked why there was a catch basin proposed in front of his house. (Dewey sma - These are needed for the total area for total blacktopping, as the £r nt ditch would be filled. You would not be included unless the blacktop~ing is done. ) Public Hearing June 12, í. :; 'Minutes - Page Larry Morris - 3605 - l43rd Avenue N. W. Stated that only six families are having problems, therefore, the 1ity should forget the roads and go the cheapest way possible. Charles Wood strom _ 3701 - l45th Avenue N. W. j,sked i,f the property along the lake was going to be assessed for t e proJect. (Dewey Kisma - Ndhing north of l45th Avenue will be assessed. ) John MelJe - 14211 Vintage Street N. W. Asked if the entire area had been shot for elevation; and if everyone *ould be assessed. Also wanted to know what would keep the water lut of his front yard.' (Dewey K sma - The entire area has been shot for elevation; and only the benefited Iproperty owners will be assessed ;':md the water should be kept out of yoJr front yard by cutting down the street. The council has up to six montHs to revise the project area. ) Dan sChJist - 14319 Underclift Street N. W. Eated that the streets were not a problem, and $1,000.00 was too uch to spend for an inconvenience; and if the storm sewer was bsolutely necessary, then he would like to go ahead with it now. fkod C_oil"","un Wind"biH whu..d wba, h. wu. ..'ming ,. hen he had mentioned in a conversation that there was litigation ending against the builder .)f some of the homes having problems. (Council erson Windschitl - A civil suit had been instigated against E. V. Builders by Messr1s. Bronstad.. and Leuck. ) Asked if the plaintiffs would receive a cash settlement if they won the ase; and stated that if this did happen, it would not be fair.) (Willi:am awkins - Regardless of the decision, the plaintiffs would still be assessed he same as everyone, else.) Jerry Br nstad - 14338 Woodbine Street N. W. r,.d 'bal h. wuwd nul b. mukin, uny mon.y hum lb. luw,w' u,uin., . V. Builders. Steve Lib r - 14279 Underclift Street N. W. Asked if he would be assessed for his whole lot if only part of it were enefited as shown on the map; and if he could be assessed again for torm sewer. (Dewey K sma - The assessment would only be for the square footage of the of the lot if another line were put in to benefit that part of the area. ) , Pat Horn r - 14269 Woodbine Street N. W. tSked if there would be a public hearing when and if sanitary sewer I ere ever proposed for the area. (Mayor Schneider - Yes, and the residents would be notified. ) Public Hearing Tune 12, 1. J Minutes _ Page Martin Castle - 14339 Vintage Street N. W. sked if the street could just be cut down and the water run directly i to Round Lake. (Dewey Ka ma - If the grade were.reversed, this could just transfer the problem to another area. ) , !,H":!P . . ~_~ ~L dØ fJé . ::'Tð.!J~tl.1 Mayor Sc neider asked Mr. Kasma if st-e-rm sewer would be needed if sanitary sewer weie Pc~Li~; and if the installation of S~h sewer at a later date would disturb th bfâ:-cktop. Mr. Kasma noted that storm sewer definitely would be needed.~~ot di3LurL the ol<t~1CluP; <rnd-he-<i~!u'l ",ùvu~äL" ùuing <he .'''''[ b,foo, "tilili.., lilb, uHliti.. ... immiuo"t 'n lb, my no" £utu.,_ but sanita y sewer looks quite a way into the future for this area. Larry Sto y - 14338 Vintage Street N. W. :"tsked how the assessment would be gauged for payment; and noted that J has water in his backyard that is coming from down the street. (Dewey K sma _ Everyone who benefits pays equally; if you feel you are assessed nfairly, you can handle this at the assessment hearings before certificatfn, at which time each question will be checked out so that the assessme t will be fair.) Ron Johns,on - 14416 Vintage Street N. W. ~oted that he felt that if the project would shrink too much, it could e put through because there would not be as many people objecting. Councilpe son Rither - The engineer had checked for the cheapest solution to the probl m which was $13,700.00. If it were done this way, the cost would have to b borne by the General Fund; and the General Fund just could not afford su h a cost. Councilpe son VanderLaan - IT this were done on one project, a precedent would be stablished, and it would have to be done this way on all future projects. It would s ill be coming out of your taxes, and in the end, could cost everyone more. Walter A ntzen - If Mr. Castle were to do the work to solve his own problem, it could c st him upwards of $3,000.00; and if he did go ahead and do this, it would cre te the same type of problem for his neighbors. Mr. Castle's sewer has failed now, and if something is not done, I would gues s that three more will fail ithin the next six months. Councilpe son Holasek - The water problem has to be resolved; but I feel that with he pos sibility of sanitary sewer coming in the near future, you would not get th useful life out of the blacktopping before it was torn up. Councilpe son Windschitl to Mrs. Sonsteby - Do you Own the property to the west, and is thi not a peat area? What would happen if you ran the line down into this area inst~ad of Round Lak~, as it is a shor~er distance? Mrs. Sonsteby replied that she d d own the area, It was peat, and it would be a good idea to run it into lbi. ....I"d m.k, · .kuHog oink '00 lb, kid, in lb, wiole., huw'm, lbi, wuuld F'ublic Hearing me 12, l7,J Minutes _ Page 6 be aolittli south of 143rd (Councilperson Windschitl had referred to the area straight est of l44th and Xenia); and that this would be a good temporary solution until everything has to go in. Councilperson Windschitl emphasized that it wo~ld have to be a permanent solution. councilPJrson VanderLaan to Mr. Kasma - Would taking off pieces of the project b detrimental tocother property owners; and would it be just another temporar solution? Mr. Kasma replied that the pipes would be sized so that addit onal lines could be tied in; and would be permanent in each stage. The audience co mented on the City's allowing these homes to be built in an area where drainage problems were anticipated. The Council noted that there are standards in existence nowl which were not at that time, that will not permit this to occur. Discussion with e engineer on cost figures if the project were reduced in size, or if specific ite s were removed from the project. MOTION by Vand rLaan, seconded by Windschitl, that the Public Hearing on the proposed Storm ewer and Street Surfacing in Auditor's Subdivision No. 82, be continued to Jun 18, 1975, 7:30 P. M., at the Andover Community Center, 1685 Crosstown oulevard N. W., Anoka, Minnesota. Engineer Kasma asked for diuodiun '<om ~ cu..on .. <0 who' fig"m und b_d..i.. lb.y w.n,.d foo lb. continued hearin , and was informed those for the area north of l43rd Avenue. Motion carried animously. Hearing adjourn d at 9:25 P.M., June 12, 1975, to be continued on June 18, 1975, 7:30 P.M. Patricia K. Lind uist Clerk/Treasure . . . MEMORANDUM TO FOREST LAKE VILLAGE COUNCIL , RE: STORM DRAINAGE No municipal improvement causes greater discussion from both I property owners and elected officials than stonn drainage. Some property I ' owners, especially ones with no particular drainage problems, take the I "- position that there is no private benefit to their property by installation I' I of storm drainage. I ' In view of the confusion on this situation, we, will attempt to outline ~lOW some of the reasons the Courts have given justifying pri"ðte "'''''fi'11'''''''dual p<o_ """"" &om I."allan"" of """" dunlna90, -, even though a Rarticular ~arcel situated on hiqh land is already weU - I drained . 1. DISCF.ARGE OF THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR INCREASED UNOFF. Before a particular property Is improved I only about : t n per cent (10%) of the water that faUs on such property runs I ff to neighboring land. The other ninety per cent (90~) is oaked into the soil, held back in natural depressions or ¡ I' vaporatød. The act of improving tþe property, however, eliminates he very features that tended to hold back and absorb the water. ....... Factors such a8 construction of a street, grading the · . - rroperty, constructing buildings, improvements and driveways, result In an increased runoff so that after improvement I approximately forty-five per cent (45%) of the water runs off I on to neighboring land and becomes, according to common law bonc6Pt. "outlaw water", a responsibility of the individual roperty owner. Construction of stonn drainage helps the individual roper-ty owner dIscharge such responsibility and is, therefore. direct benefit. 2. DISPOSAL OF WASTE PRODUCT. Another theory partly elated to the above, is that amounts of stonn water in greater - antities than can be used and absorbed by the so11 result in noff of a waste product on to neighboring lands just as much s the dl.scharge of sewage or garbage. If the construction of torm drainage is the best disposal of this waste product, then direct benefit results to the property owner in discharging his OOi vidual re sponsib1Uty. , 3. PERMITTING FASTER RUNOFF. In many villages the rea proposed to be served by a storm drainage is fairly level As surface water forms its own barrier, the drawing ff of such surface water on lower levels is made possible by storm drainage and therefore allows water on upper land to flow ore readily and escape faster. Page No.2. · . 4. INCREASED MARKET VALliE. It is generally accepted t t the market value of a particular neighborhood, and therefore the market value of each parcel of land located I within the neighborhood, is increased due to adequate storm I water drainage. 5. BETTER ACCESS. By eliminating accumulations of surface water, access to property is often improved in Umes I of wet conditions. L""" "'œfit ""'" "ann "'''n.,." thal ...qu." "~d'.I~.. would slrve to prevent all or a substantial portion of serious damage which might 0 cur throughout a whole neighborhood in the event of an unpredictable ... flood of rain water or melting snow. t has been held to be a benefit to the public health to dispose of surface ate!' which, .If left standing, would be a breeding ground for insects and other forms of growth inJurious to the public health. he ge,neral public also derives benefit from storm drainage in that storm d ainage makes possible street improvements and provides drainage for stre ts, which drainage reduces the cost of future maintenance. hat l"::Jrtion of storm drainage assessed against property owners is usua lV assessed on an area square foot basis, although other methods - could b employed. In the case of this particular improvement, the Page No.3. -- , Village must assess at least twenty per cent (20%) of the cost ot the ~ improvement, The exact amount of assessment, and method of assessmentJcannot be determined, however, until after the total project costs have en calculated and the Councll has determined the amount of general benelit to be paid by the Village as a whole. , I I . I Village Attorney I I I I I I I I I I ,-... I I I I I I I I I I , I I i I I I , I , , , I I I I , - I I Page No.4. I ! i l ¡ I , ._.. - - _0.0- . -..~ I , -- I · " , -.., " TKDA I TOm, KING, DUVALL,ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED i I!:NGINI!:I!:RS AND ARCHITI!:CTS 1408 PIONEER BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 224 -7891 f RICHARD M. IBARKER ¡ June 12, 1975 OWEN J. BEATTY D,,'UUL lot. BERKOWITZ ROBERT J¡.. 80YE" JAMES C. BROTEN ARNDT J. DUVALL HUGO O. EftICK&ON WILLIAM J. "IYDr... ~OYC! e. HANSEN STEPHEN M. HARTLEY CLI""ORO E. JOHNSON CUWAYNE R. KASMA J. THOMA.S KIRK DAVID W. I<IRKWOLD A. DIAN LUNDHOLM FtoaERT T. MALONEV " .tJCHAftO D. MENKEN " LEONARa ca. MIL.LER WAYNE A.. OLSON DUANE T. PREW R;UCOL.PH p, RAITOA fll:OBItRT R. RYDER WILLIAM T. SHERIDAN ABE J, SPERL.INQ ARNOLD M. STEFrr'!8 WALTER W. THORPE JAMES E, VOVEN NATHAN P. WEBER Dear Resident: GEORGE J. IiCHROEPFEft CLIFFORD W. HAMBLIN The City Council i conducting a Public Hearing on June 12, 1975 at 7:30 P.M. ) discus s the feasibility of constructing storm sewers and bituminous surfaced streets in Auditor1s Sub-division No. 82, City of Andover. , Th. folluwing ,nfUFuliun i' p'...n"" un <b. p......d p"j'''' , 1) Why is a s orm sewer system necessary? The probleL of strom water runoff must be faced in every area which ""d"'''J d...lupn"n' in" h="lI", Poi", 'u d,..lup~"" ,""". runoff pre ents few problems. But as growth occurs. the surface topo- graphy is hanged and natural drainage ways are altered or blocked. Drive- ways, str ets, the roofs of buildings and other man made structures in- crease th intensity and amount of runoff. Rain fall which may have evap- orated or oaked away previously now runs off and settles in localized areas. High lots, on which most rain fall and snow melt was caught in the rougher, undcvelop d land, are now smoothly graded. Runoff is therefore increased causing m re problems for low lots. The propo ed storm sewer system would drain the water which collects in these loca ized low points. The point of origin of this water is not only the low lots. ut all property which drains into a particular drainage basin. TIll' atla'" t'cI Flgnrt" No. I shows the location of lhl' proposl'cI storm s"W('r I HYAtt'nl, a cI the bcnditrc1 area, '- --,-I i , ; ~'me 12, 1975 I age Two I I I 2) What type of street construction is proposed for our area? ì A street prlject in your area would include excavating the existing dirt I roads to prÒvide proper street profiles and drainage, placing a 32 foot wide by 4" thiCk gravel street base, and constructing a 32 foot wide ,1-1/2" thic bituminous driving surfacing with bituminous gutter. ! T he life exJectency of the street, with prope r sealcoating and cJ:'ack- I i filling, is 10 to 20 years. I The attachjd Figure No. Z shows the streets which are proposed to be I I I constructej' , I 3) What is the proposed time schedule of the Citv to install central sanitary I sewer and watermain systems in this area? Th, ...o.¡ ^.,Hloo'. Sub-dl.i.iuo Nu. gz .. wilbin lb. U.boo Plooolo, Au.. of the City as shown in the Comprehensive Plan. Extension of the sanitary I sewer syst m to this area is planned as development OCcurs and as service I i, "qu..t by p.."".ly ~n..., ! It is diffic It to predict the exact time of thts extension since a wide range of economic factors influence development. We estimate that 5 to 10 years may pass ~efore sewer service is extended to this area. The actual date I may, of course, vary considerably from these time estimates. , , , , Constructi n of a water system to Serve this area is not being planned at this time. Th earliest date for water service extenUon would be when sanitary ice is extended, but, as previously stated, no plans exist at this is work. 4) What ste are neCessar et the work done? T he following steps neces sary for the completion of the project: A. City Council hold Public Hearing June 12, 1975 B. City Council orders project, authorizes i , Eng neer to prepare plans and specifications June 12, 1975 , I , C. Eng neer submits plans for Council approval, i ! and receives authorization to advertise for bids July IS, 1975 D. Cit Council receives bids and awards contract August 5, 1975 E. Con ractor begins construction August II, 1975 F. Con ractor completes construction October I, 1975 G. Ci I Engineer prepares final cost estimates and assessment roll October 1, 1975 I I I ! I June 12, 1975 I Page Three I , I , H. City Council conducts assessmffi t hearing I , , Any errors or adjustments in asses sments are I , made at this meeting October 14, 1975 I. Citl Council passes resolution accepting ì ass ssment roll and directs Clerk to file with I Ano a County Auditor before October IS, 1975 October 14, 1975 I 5) How much' will the storm sewer and street construction cost me? I ! T he City Engineer has prepared cost estimates for construction of the storm se1er system and the bituminous streets, These costs are as I follows: I St0'jm Sewer Construction $ 51,900.00 I I Street Construction 108,700.00 Tot 1 Project Cost $ 160,600.00 i The entir cost of each of these improvements is proposed to be assessed I against th bene fite d prope rtie s. Streets are assessed on an adjusted front footage basis to all abutting properties. Adjusted front footages will include , ; provision for corner lots and irregular shaped lots. ! , Based on he preliminary cost estimate of $108,700.00 and a total front footage of 11,100 feet the front foot assessment for street would be $108,700 or $'.80 per front oot. ll,lOOFF Storm se ers are assessed ona square footbasis. The boundaries of the drainage area are ete rmined and each lot within those boundaries is assessed for each square fo t of area d raining into the system. Based on the preliminary cost estimate f $51, 900. 00 and a total benefited area of 1,230,000 square feet the asses ment would be $ 51, 900. 00 or $.042 per square foot. l,230,000SF The assp sment for an average lot 100 feet in width by 150 feet deep,which drains en irely into the storm sewer system would be as follows: Str et Construction 100'.", $9.80 per foot = $ 980.00 Sto m Sewer Construction 15,000 SF x $.042 per SF 0, 620.00 $1600.00 i ,. ~,~ ì · June l2, 1975 I Page Four , , Assessment can be paid in full, or paid on an installment basis with ; property taxes over a 10 or 15 year period. The annual charges, based on a $1,600joo assessment and 8'}', annual interest, would be as follows: Year 1 year assessment 15 year assessment 1976 288.00 234.66 i I 1977 275.20 226.08 1978 262.40 217.55 I 1979 249.60 209.02 i 1980 236.80 200.49 1981 224.00 191. 96 , 1982 211.20 183.43 I 1083 198.40 174.90 1984 185.60 166.37 1085 172.80 157.84 1986 149.31 I 1987 140.78 ¡ 1988 132.26 1989 123.73 1990 115.20 5) Wh ro"ect at this time? I , The constr ction industry prices have continued to rise in the past years, i and the out! ok is for continued higher prices. The Engineering News Record Cos Index, which is a national publication that indicates cost trends in c nstruction, lists, the following increases in recent years based 01'$100.00 orth of construction in 1965: Year Base of $100.00 Percent increases per ·year 1965 $ 100.00 1966 103.87 3.9 I 1967 108.90 4.8 , I 1968 116. 07 6.6 i I 1969 127.64 10.0 I I 1970 136.60 7.0 I 1971 152.98 12.0 , 1972 l73,74 13.6 1973 190.84 9.8 1974 202. 19 5.9 , · ¡ j I June 12, 1975 I Page Five i If a project is need]d, it is reasonable to proceed with the project as soon as possible to obtain the benefit of the improvement, since the interest at 80/r will probably be less thin the annual increased construction cost. As your City cons~ting Engineers, we hope this letter answers some of your questions regardin this proposed street project. Very truly yours, TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ~~~ i DuWayne R. Kasma, P.E, DRK:vlo ! "closure I cc: Mrs. Pat Lindquist, Clerk-T reasurer I Mr. WaIte Arntzen, Building Inspector Andover Ci y Council I I ¡ I i , I I ./ ¡ """"-"- , ~ ~ Hm"KE % ::---0--- - -.;;;: / 1811 ! ~ V" NW CB , ~- CB ~ 1451h I t-' t-' t-' en en en PROPO~ -" 'I FD, STORM 18'1 i 01'1 ""... ...... , CB'S CB , ÇBS ";:' ./.!':' 127:' 1211 1511 ISII 15" ~BS 144th v- I-' en 12" w l- I z "- CD W -' 0 '-' u ¡ <t 0 <t a:: w z 0 t- o ! w .:;; z z i-.... J x "'B > ~ I CB Q i 12" 143rd AVE, l¡{'r3S 12" I~ ~Ë3 :0- -J Q) I '" 7 , ""--- I-' I-' en en 12 -... CB w '" 12 J <[ MH --' -... ---- w t;: Z -' ~J ------- ID -- --,,---: w ,--'--- u ....-..."---- '-' 15 -- L) 0 ~ ., z 8 r- 0 ~ z, z ...,J u ~ : > ~ _____,.._ II I _ _ _ DENOTES æNEFITTED AREA PROPOSED STORM SEWER SYSTEM 0 DENOTES CATCH BASIN 11<DA AUDITORS SUB. NO. 82 CITY OF ANDOVER FIGURE I ""y ,., 1975 ¡ -z;..- ~ I 'OUNG LAKE AØ' . ~ Jøøv ~~ ~ / i , I I /' ! '151ft - ... I , I "'" "'" "'" ¡ ~ ~ ~ I . ' I I TO ROUND II LAKE BLVD. , ~ 144" F4VE. I w ~ z ~ ëñ 4J ...J « 0 C> U _ 0 « a:: z 0 t- I..LJ 1 W ~ Z 0 IX S, '> ~ Q I 143rd AVE. N.W.:'; , ~ "'" "'" "'" I If) If) (f) UJ '"' <r -J W t z - m ~ ~ Q ~ u 8 ! i ~ ~ > ::;) 0 I ~ j I PROPOSED BITUMINOUS ~ PROPOSED STREET CONSTRUCTION STREEì CONSTRUCTION MAY 28, 1975 AUDITORS SUB, NO. 82 CITY OF ANDOVER FIGURE 2 I- PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LlNE-1 I I 66' I I Cf. 17' 1 ' 16' 17' I I MAX. SLOPE 5: I I MIN. SLOPE 1/4"/FT. ..... ..... . .. .... '.- .......:.... ' , , , " . .... " 1-1/2" BITUMINOUS MAT 4" CLASS 5 GRAVEL 4" CLASS:3 GRAVEL OR APPROVED EQUAL 4" :r~ BITUMINOUS BERM , 4" CROWN I. 11_011 .II tk a STANDARD SlØ.RBAN STREET TOLTZ,KING,~ANDERSON SECTION a ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS T 'MItI'IS,1975 OIIG. NO,' :3 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA . \ , , \2" \) STORM SEWER ~" ~-f RESIDENT OF AUDITOR'S SUB-DIVISION NO. 82, CITY OF ANDOVER: I RE: PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 12, 1975 at 7:30 P.M. - ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM AS PRESENTLY I PROPOSED BY THE CITY CONSULTING ENGINEERS? . --~ ------- ,.... _ _ _ 0 I f , , I I I \ , - n :Þ _ _ -0 c<J -..J Ç' (J, ~ VJ 9J I ;:! _ 0 - 0 Z ~ ~ §' t ~ ~....... C\\} >-. ~ <-. ~ :~ -..J ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ "> '-J ~ --J ~ 1= (t'~ ~ --.!: '- 't "" ~ ~ ~ U\ . ~ 0', ~~ '" '" ¡)\ "'.., R ~ ""::t::.~' 0'1, '1 ~~ ~ ~ t::l.; ~ ;", ~ ~. ~I.· ~,.;. ~ ~ ~ y. ~ }J' v :!:> ~ ,þ ~ "" ~ "" I . '. ~ ' -S "IT! ~' ~ f I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~\ ~ '~)ç ~ ~"t\ § 1.I\0l" ~ ':\ y.. ~ \!- ~.. ~ ~~ ~ :Þ ~ ~~ t~ ~~ .<k '~ ~ ~. f ~~ F' ~ '1 ~ ~ ~~ k'·~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~~ f '\. t ~ ~ ~)~ L )'. ~. -< IT! II> . A ~~ ~ c.i' 7"-- "W ~ -'T.P~ t~ ?: ..... -..., ~ í ~-I~~~ ~ --, ---- -~-, ~ ,/,~. \ ~ \ '~Î' . ; , - ~ ,- '-~ ,.... o . - - n - - - :Þo I I I I I -i () ifl ...r: VJ <µ S! I ~ < -"---'" '"") ()'It I~' ~ ~ ___ t "£'- ~ , ~, ~ :Z " . , ~ '0-> :Þ "-5\3: I . "?,..: - ,;::" ~ ", I . It, -t.. r,,,:,,,,) '-.:¡ ~ ~ . I"~),, (> c> t:J ~L [. V~~, ;'E; ~~~,~~~~ ~f- Ç>-~~~ \~ = I'- r ~ I¡' \J\ VI I-- "- I; , '--- . -< ", VI Y '\ X õ I ", ~'~n__ ____ __+- :z o o "'CJ ~, ;; .... o -.: )ù, ~ , - , <;>..) \1-J ?J - - I , "-> -, 0 --Q I ~ "';) '-.J , "-> ,... liì \ , '10 ,., 0 -<::. L>J I I n 9-J :Þ '^" -t -.:> W ~ .... 0 C). ~ ~ "- :z - , ~~ :& '* - -1::: ) ~~ '0 W '- v, G r ~ ~ ~ ~~. I ~t \ ,~' , ~ --- t~ ~~ l·~ , ''',..;" . ---.D ~ ;r 3: It' ~ '. : >Lt r i ~ f: ~ ~..' 8 r~ ~ ~ ,,', :::c ~' T , U> U> ~ -< T U> ~~ . ~ 'k ~ 1~ ¡ .~ t. t U> ·~l~-t .... :z Ii> o :z :Þ -t c: ;;0 T :z 0 0 , " .... :z .... ~ - tJ ~ <;u ':I-.> ~ 9J 'µ ';LJ <µ ?-' <p 0 n J , r I , , , , :x- I I - 5G -.. - - LJ.) -< - - 6\ U'¡ - .... -J 0 -::> c><j 00 -.s:: 9J 0 :z ª'r ,~ :ë: w "~ ~ ~ oJ ~ I 9J a-- \\ ""'õ 00 rJ ~ :Z ç;¡;::, , .&.....~ c ..Q \J' :x- I I 3: £'~f ' IT! -= '- ~:x- \\\\{ ~ . ~ ~IY)~ a w' \ :x- ~ ! t. r- ! ~ ~ ~ - ~ . \~\ , r- ~ <:. -< IT! tn . --, r ~ t ß 'tt ÌJ ~ ~ tn .... . '" ~ '\ :z :z 8 ;<) ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ t \\ ~ " r I ~ IT! r .... ~ r ~ n ~ ~---~ :z 0 0 " .... :z .... ~ r- vJ LA) W vJ (,V vJ LV 0J l)J 0 w vJ n , I I I I I :Þ I I I I -I "- '- --:) "<J -.J (' 11", -L:. W 9-> ~ "- 0 - 0 z , - ...... "S,~ ~ ~~ ~ l' ... '- - ~ z ~ . '" <:::... :Þ .,.~~, ~ ", Ç'-.. . tI :Þ "- ~.. z " , '" ~ ~ '" :Þ '{ ~t;: '" '" \\ "" ~ ", V1 V1 h ..J\ ~ ~ .... ~ .'f. -< ", V1 . r ~. ~ ¿ , V1 ~ \ ~ ~ ~ '" Z Z ~ 0 :Þ -< ; ~ c: "" ", , o ~ - ._--~- --- - ~ :z 0 0 .." ~ Z ~ 0 z I ,- r- W W W uJ 0 w w w W \)J W n I \ I , I I I ( ¡ I :Þ -i <;0 "-.:. -. - - --- lJ) - - .... C> -.() "0 --J G' -.t:. (,J \'" 0 - z '- '" .:t... ÚJ Vj ~ \' oa "- ~ .. z \(! :Þ C :;: ,....,., ", ~ :Þ "- Z <:::J ~ :Þ <:::J <:::J ~ ;0 r--.. 0- ", V> , V> "1-\ ~ ""') . è -< ", V> . V> .... ~ z z 0 :Þ -i c: ;0 ", --~._-- - - 2: 0 0 -0 .... Z .... 0 ~ _n__ _ ,.... -{. ~ ~ -.t:: .J:: ..r:. ..t. ~ -t::: 0 -C. .þ n I I I I \ , I I I :Þ {' U) (j-i \ -t ~ ;y --.{) "<! '-J ..r:: µ - - 0 z ~N ~ !;\. ,tJ ~ ~ It '-f , "- "- ~ ~ II-- ~ \.!( ~ ,. l~ "- ';\)~ ~t -<\ ~ ~ ~~ . ~~ t-~ .~ ~ ~ \~ t. ~ n "> ( ~ -< IT! V1 . V1 - ~ '" )<: Z Z 0 :Þ -I c: ::0 IT! . .--------. ---- -- "" ~ 0 0 " - Z - 0 ~ - --'----, .... 0 ~ ~ n :Þ I I -t .... - - 0 \;J <¡J Z i . ", ~ 3: . . ", :Þ , z I . c I :Þ c c ;0 ", V1 V1 ! -< ", V1 . --- r' V1 .... In :z "" 0 :Þ -t c: XI ", --"-- -.. -- -,-- r-' :z 0 0 ." .... :z .... :: I I ¡ I I ,- .._-- r- lit lfl LIl U1 0 ú ' V1 VI úl Ul U) <Jl n :» I , I I I , , , , I -i , - ~) <>() ...J £"' U) -I:: l>J cµ - - C - g - , r=-"- I "- U) '~ 7 '" ~ ~- ~~ -r :z~ -..J~ , " ~ ~, - <¡;.> \ .',- Iv ... r- r , " !J ,"'-~ ~~ ~- I 'V,;. 0t :¡ - { '-..., ~ ' , ~T ,,, - ""1Ù " c.-- [) ~ -. ,.... . (~-.-. I~ ~, -', ç '~ :;: "( )' '.~'.J (" J' 31'3 IT1 -~ ':0 .::-'~ ~.*' ~~ :» \ r-co. "'":--".':~ '. , " c- \ -.."';"'»; :. ",.) :: ~ s¿; 6 , r ~_ I '-.~ r '" " "> ' ' z; \" , \.-.. ~ . ~~ ç~ ~ "," I " "- ~c ( ,~ -J? ..-- ,,", I :",,-"" ';. " !j'¡ ~ ' --' ~ ~ I f/ . \" ..\ ,- ~ ~ '~ . ~.~ [\ ~ ç \" 'tV , .'\ ~,"'-,<~ ç ~ '. ~~ ~ l . " " [11;-._ ~~ I ") " . ~ -, " , , r- I r 'J - I I . -< IT1 VI . r /7 11: VI '" - In ,~ X -~ ;r ;?< . .)( 'V X :z :z /-, 0 :» ^ " ~/. JJ.. -i / \, / c: ~ '" IT1 "="'" "- ~ ~ ,- , ( ___.___u :z 0 0 ." . - :z - 0 ~ ~ , I I I i --'-,- r- úl 0 n :Þ , -I - .... SU 0 :z . ~ - ".' :z c., :Þ . , . ': 3: , '. .... ", . , ." :Þ . :z ~-::, 0 , \, :Þ \~ ' 0 , ' 0 f~ ;c """ ", VI "- VI I -< ", VI . VI .... ~ '" :z :z 0 :Þ -I c:: ;c ", ---.---- , :z 0 0 ." .... , :z .... 0 I I " - .-,-- r- c- o Ô' 6' ~ 6' 6' n :Þ I I I I I I -I .... (n -t:: UJ 'µ - 0 ~ :z I , I ',~", "\ W~ ~ ,\ ~k G'-.~ \"! ~ "'-c r ~~ ~.t ~ ~'- " "- ~~ ~,~ - :z :Þ "f , :;: ~,., t:' . ,-Ç:. ", ~t ..... - \,-, . , " è"""x :Þ '" ~ t~ 0;;;;;- ~-.'J :z ~ 'l fJ <::1 ~~ ~~ :Þ ~ 0" ~~ <::1 '1) ~ Rõ\ <::1 I , "':-í:'\ -c ;u :-- \ ~'~ ~. ~. ' ", ~~ ,,-.} t--- V> ~ ~ ~~ " V> , '\'~! > ~t ~~ ~J ~ -c' ~ 'l ,. >::s ~ '" ." . -< ", V> . -- -. "--- ~ ~ ~ V> .... ~ 'J C> :z :z / 0 :Þ '0 / -I c:: ;u ", .~.~._-- --, , - :z 0 0 ..., ; . .... :z .... 0 ~ ·-.--- r- o .....J "--.j '" -..J '" --.J -J £: \^ I ' 1 , I I I -I ~ \ -J €' U) J:: l;J <µ - 8 '\ . :z \'\ ('¡ I '\ ~ ~'~ Z ';t ~ ¥',' ~ \...' ~ \ ~ ___} c:.;~ i"~ N~ r-v{:. IV'\... -.c..... ' \) & " ~, ~ ,;: ~'. ~. , - \.., I 1'<\,.' I.e, ~~ '-¡.: " t ~''\'~. '\ ~ V\ \- ~ \i "'-. ~ . ? "" 1\' 3: ¡), J ;;:, "1-, ," ~I" ~ 0, ~' ~ \ ~ ~~. ~ ~ "-, \, ~ t'. (, .. , I" ~ t ~. ~ I ~ ~J ~~ ~. . ~ ~ D\' r-,~ ~ ~ ~: r ~ ~ r:- "~Ì\'~ r,::! ~ , 35 ~ . ~ '" i " ~. ,rJ, ,,,, r---. I" " , " \ V1 -t ' ~ \, (" ~ . "V1 v" ,,~1', ,\ , " ~ ~ " 'I \ '- ~~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~. ~ -h " ( f' t~ -< , ,." V1 í , I . ""..- f:: r::-. "'---- 1\1 ~ . , ~ .)... ~ ~ '{' L ~ ~ j . ~ ~. \ ,j [' ....;.'''- N f', ¡;' " , (\.J ,,~ ~ , .~ J, r ~ ~:z ~ '" ~ ~~' ~ .l., b , " ", ~ ~,~ ~.' ~"'k' ~ ~" ~~ -=- ";o..~,{- J~, ~ ~ ~ \:~. s· (I"'~ \ , -....- ,-- -- . :z o o -" # - ;z - o , ~ I - tÞ ~ I STREET CONSTRUCTION AND BITUMINOUS PAVING RESIDENT OF AUDITOR'S SUB-DIVISION NO. 82, CITY OF ANDOVER: I - I .". r" RE: PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 12, 1975at.7:30 P.M. ARE YDU IN FAVOR OF THE STREET CONSTRUCTION AND BITUMINOUS PAVING I I AS PRESENTLY PROPOSED BY THE CITY CONSULTING ENGINEERS? . . '" - ¿~ ~~ ROUND LAKE ~r ~ ~ -~ I / . ~.IÎ- 3-10 3-11 3-12.. 4-\0 ! ~~ N.W. ~ \-\S 1-\10 J-1 ¡...,¡~. 1t--9 ~ 145th J-J.O . 3-"1 3-)\ . 1-14 I I-' I-' I-' [L¡- ~ <n 1-<t <n <n ~-Iq 3-\7 3-,16 1-13 I ~-7 ;).-7 :J-\11 3-7 :'-1"1 1-';;1. I ;2-(., ~-11 4-<0 3-b 3-\? . TO ROUND 1\.---5 LAKE BLVD. 1-5 I-{" I-II ,-os :J _110 :'-5 3'11 -:::::::---. . . 144th r' I-' <n I-II 1-10 J-1¡. ::1-1' 3-4 ~'13 4 3-1<0 . 4-~ -Il 1-3 1-'1 .~-3 a-II¡ 3-::' 3- C, UJ Lt-3 f- I-~ I-í' z LL . m '2..-;;t UJ 3-J 3-IY ..J ~ 0 C> u 1\ -J. ' 0 ¡:: a: / z 0 w UJ ~ Z 0 x , ;; z I-I 1-7 2-1 :;l-ß 3-1 3-\~ ::> 't-I I j.~ \I , 43rd AVE. ;::.; J N.W. -J . 5-'1 5-') 5-.\ Co -I (,-5 7-1 ~ . .... I-' 7-5 7 <n I-' <n <n . 5-10 Sl 5'-,¡ (0-;2 7-J. 7-(., w ~ <r . -J ,,-11 5- 5-3 (,,-3 b-b 7-3 UJ t 7-7 <! ::¡ ijj ~ u s-Ia c 5-' 5"-4 (.,-4 ffi Pf 0 8 z !: c ::J ;;: :2 0 > ::J I ,...--1 Q: TKDA PROPOSED STREET CONSTRUCTION I I PROPOSED BITUMINOUS AUDITORS SUB. NO. 82 STREET CONSTRUCTION MAY 28, 1975. I CITY OF ANDOVER FIGURE 2 8 ~ z ~ - ~ ~ .t-. C> . Z ~ ,< ~ . Ü --'--- .-.-,. . . - 'c._, ~ ~. . 2 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ o·~ I ~ ~ _ z.~ I ' "l "" ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t, I VI UJ >- 1 y . ~ '" ~~. ;¡: VI """'" '< "'~ 1 1 t ~ ~ ~ ~ ,. ~ ~ ~. ex:"-~ 1\ ~'" "" .¿ 8 ~ ~ :::t:: Q) I.:' 2:'-" o«~....~ '<j'L r- ~ ~~.~ ~ '. \~.~. ~ ~ ~ ::: 0« '>í . . . .' ~ . ~ ~.t<D ~ " \1" ~ ~ ~ M /lJ 0.1) o«~v- ~ x: ¡...--oç::>- J.¿0 z ~ ~ ~~' I'ì" 1 ~ {~ ~ ~ ç¡ K !') 0 _'1: M . .J ")J I';) . ~ ~ ~ \Df' \1) ~ , . M ) z ~ I rY:. M ~ VJ ~ f'. ~ <r -2. .::::- ..: _ /1 I I I I I I I l u - - - - g I --.... --- - - - --- - ~ õ - ---- :z: - -.--- - D- ~ 0 "-.,. . 0 :z: CJ X x "" ¡:; , 0 \j ~ :z: t3 - ~, . . VI LU >- . . ~, i ~~ ~ ¡ q, 1, g;. ..-" f ,;J .... ~ ~) ~ If) 0 I --- .J Z <oJ ¡V) - T , - 0 - I - .... - I- ~ - U 0 ...J I I ~ ê5 .... z .... a. C> C> z -.. .- ..~. ' --- --,--- .-----.. ~,. \4 ~-1o~ ~~ \ :-:1 z W ~ "^§ ~;I ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ '" w >- ~ ~' V\ ~ ~ ~ ~ \~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,ß ~ ~ ~J ~ . ~ .~ . _) __~ ~ ~ J ~. ~ .~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~" ( 1"\ W ~"",., .. . .~. . :'"I \J) :E: '" .. .'0. \":): ':r ""'~Î1) 'ì'-- .....- z ~ .... ':;¡-.. ~ ~ I . .'" ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ - " 'i- ~~ ~ .~ z . C> Q ~ .... _ c<, M ":r \n r- r...,. CJ--- -..::. '- ~ I I I I I I g c{. c'<. ~ C"/, rb '" ~ " <'I, ...J I i , i ~ õ ~ z: ~ a. o o z: -.... -- ------- --------. ~ J f ~ f.; 0 ~ (; ~ [Í ~ ¡\'\ ~ t <\ ~ V) w >- ~ . ~ ~ '" ~ ,{ }J : ~~ ,'" . ~ ,J ~ ~ \ LV ~ ' ,,'. . . " f ,.. \~ . ~ z: L. ..J", ). ~. ~ ~ ~. þ . ~ ~ ~ . ~M 4(") cO ~ N'> . "T ~ " '::!- - - ¿§ N C", 7" v) \!) ~. OJ ~ "'~ () 1\ - - - - - -- (',(...... I- - ' ~ ." c:C I I I I I I I I g «) ~ l':) ÏìS ~ /lJ -' I I - ê3 - z - D- o 0 z ~..- . , ~ '-'.',., .) --. ------ ..-.--.. ~-~ .-~ ~J ~ t·~ °1, ex¡ -0 ~ g ¡:c. ~ 0 ~ z ". S C.:.,t to.... .'.'1. ~ ~ VI ~ ; .- J. . ~ . VI LU >- . ') j , . ~ R. \ 3 ~ ..,. ~ VI V' ~ VI ~~ LU r¡, cr: 0 '" 0 ;¡ .., ",f « ...,- " -~ ~ . <:> '. z ·'l~ ,.., ":::::,. « ::> ' LU :;: '" . t: r "- « -ò' ." z: ~ Q J~ ~ Ì' ~~ !; ~ J - "- .... z I 0 Q ~ - ::¡- 0<., C'- I- - """ rY\ In -..) r- ---- « ( I I 1 1 , I I I I I U 0'1 tll (\1 M IV) M M rf) ('I') <:> IV) ("1 -' , , , , ~ ê3 - z: , - D- o 0 z: .~- . - _~ _____ n_.___. ."·.'H fI ~ 0 :- z: <., Io·t ~., . VI ... >- . ') l . G; VI ~~ VI ... ct 0:: 0 0 ~ --.::. "'" u C> ....'N ~ z: '\ ~ "'" j ... :"""'-¡'. .'!.j " ::2 , J "'" 0-... '-.-. .~ z: ~ "" í0 ~ Q1j '" " -- z: ~ --- 0 N r'! ~ ~ r- C>.., ",- Q - C"'tJ I- - --- - -- --- ~ "'" I I , \ \ I I I U M I I 0 M M Y\ rV) fY) M tv) ...J - õ - z - ~ >< z ". ." ',..'," - -- ----- .._.--- ¡ fi ~ i ~ I ! I I , VI UJ >- . -< ~ ~ ~. ~ . ~~~ J 3 ~ -L > ~ ~~ ~ <:) '2 . , \i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~~ <:).~ J J ';J ~ '\ ~'ö ~~ ~.Ç' -.I ,'- .' ~ "ì !? \1 ""-'" \" 'oJ"- :;¡-. ~ ib N) ~'." ':::I . ~. . " ~ ~ - ~ - . J ~. I,·'¡'-'·.· .... i '- õ2 c: ~~. ~1 ~·.·j't\.1 ~.;.... . () ,'? ci 0 " \) . .\-, ..9 .' ~ /A:)~ "~ 0'"-' tf) . '" (./ - ~ () 1') J.) 'i>1 z o - - I- - ~ r0 ":r \f) 0 - "" I I ...9 I'- I><> - I lJ;:t- , I I I (J- I o ::r- -:r ::r \, -:J- ..J ._ -:::r ~ .:::r- ::r- , , - õ - z: , - C- o 0 z: . "--, - - . ;.' ! ... --- ------ -.-.---"- ......, ..... I· L¡ 1:; ~ 0 ~ z ., In I I . VI W >- . . VI VI W "" C C "'" C z: . "'" W '-""0':'" :< , ;:,: ¡ "'" Z ... ...-,,- . Z . 0 rl M - - - I- ,I "'" I u 0 ::r ~ -' I I ?' ~ ê5 .... :z .... 0- 0 0 z -- -- -.-.--- "-' '/ De => ./ \ I- >-< ;< c( 0 ',// :z :z /\ '" ""\ .... , , VI I I . ~ VI xG "-' >- .. ~~ " ....< 1--.' "'-" ~~ 1::. ~ VI , ,~:) . ~ '" , "', \ . ) .\ " . \; ~. ..-........::"\ -..:' '\:¡ ~ ,~~ ~ I -::.) ~~. '" ~, .. \ 'j c:J 0:'0 ~ . ~ I\~ '> '" --, ':. "--- .~ , , , '~ ~' 1\>.. " ~ "0.-, "C\ (i ,~~ ------ \ '\. :z rt. ['i) ~~ ~~ 0 --- 0 - ::r ..:J r-- t-- --- .... I' l- I I I I ( I I c( tn If) lfJ If) If) " VJ \;1 Vì l/) u 0 -' I I I , - õ - z: , - 0- 0 0 z: i , ---- ~----- , LLJ 0:: x: => l- e( 0 z Z t!> - V> . V> LLJ >- I, V> ~ ~ V> ,) I' LLJ 0:: )-) !I 0 0 ~\ :1 e( '-.J II 0 z e( , J I LLJ "',., . ::E: - , e( ~ z: ~ z: n; 0 - - l- I e( In u 0 -' ~ õ - :z - C- o 0 z - ---- ------- LU ~ '" ~ ~ => I- ~ <C 0 :z :z ~ '-" - VI ,-- . VI , LU ,{ >- ~~ '- ,\ '\ -- I ~ -1 VI \I '" ~ t- ~ VI V~ -.j LU '" ", ( '" -\ , S '" > <C \: '" ~ -" :z ' ' <C LU ~~ :.: <C z ~,"" - ~' '. \....\ -f .J--" z d ("l :::r Vl -3 0 - - I , I l- I I I I <C .3 ..j) --5) --!) ~ -..9 u 0 I ...J I I I - ::: 0 - '" . - C- O 0 '" ¡ ---- -- ------- ,. W 0:: => l- e>: 0 '" '" t!> - en . II'> UJ >- II'> I II'> UJ 0:: 0 0 e<: 0 . I z e<: UJ . , "-" ::¡: e<: z . .. . z 0 - l- e<: LJ 0 -I --~. , ' . z 0 .... z .... 0- 0 0 z . --- ----- 'm.___ , . à I· w J~ 0:: ~ .... j'~ co: 0 z z 'f C> .... VI ~~ ~J ~J .~ ª ~ . i ~ ?\ ~ <:::2> ¡I VI ~+ ~~~ w ~ >- ~ ~f r " '\J ,f! ~ '" '* r -- ] . 3 .~ ." -;5. ~ "1 ~ -+ ~' ~X I v1 J\. ~ VI J ~ ~ ~ f , ,I VI ". :r ~ "< w , \ù- i r, 0:: ~ v 0 " c' ..~ '-J , 0 ''S~ I I~ co: t < . v¡ . ~ -: '''_'2 I 0 ~~ .~~~ z ~ .~ ..,..;. .- ~ . ~ {2" co: " ::_, \i w J 'J; ,~ .:s tj . ,; '" :.: '{l . 0:> ., \] co: I~ C" . '\j ~~ c)7 '\' z ,~ <::: i- r( ~ -cI. ~ ' " ~, I"}?: N ~~ j Sl~ --., ~ ~ ~ ~~ ' -.\ . I ~ :g."j Z I 0 - n, rfJ ;:¡- lfJ -.3 I'-- .... .... I II I I , co: r- r- r- r- I' I'- f'- u 0 ¡ ..J , , Cfry 01 ANDOVER PUBLIC HEARING - JUNE 12, 1975 Pursuant to notice published thereof, a Public Hearing on Proposed Street Improvement in the Russell (Stack) Addition, was called to order by Mayor, Richard J. Schneider, June 12, 1975, 9:35 P. M., at the Andover Community Center, 1685 Crosstown Blvd. N. W., , Anoka, Minnesota. I Holasek, Rither, VanderLaan, Windschitl Councilpersons present: Councilpersons 'absent : None Also present: City Engineer, D. R. Kasma; City Attorney, Wm. Hawkins; City Building Official, Walter Arntzen; City Clerk, Pat Lindquist; Reporter, Shirley Hatfield; and approximately 75 residents. Mayor Schneider briefly outlined incidents and problems in the area which necessitated , the ordering of the Public Hearing by the City Council at their meeting on May 6, 1975. I TheI-':earing was then turned over the City Engineer, D. R. Kasma. Mr. Kasma noted that 163rd Lane ¡had been left out unintentionally on the map sent to the residents with the Public Hearing Notice. He informed the audience that the $3,000.00 already contributed by r. Russell would cover approximately 1/2 mile" 20' wide, 3" thick of Class #5; and that there are two miles of streets, not including l65th from 7th Avenue, in Russell Addit on. A map was posted showing the front footage to be assessed on each lot, should the project be approved. Mr. Kasma read and explained the letter from T. K. D. A. sent to the residents with the Public Hearing Notice. The Hearing wa then opened for questions and statements from the residents. Said testimony as fol ows: (Staff responses shown in parentheses. ) Mike Gies e - 16604 Yakima Street N. W. Asked¡ if the estimated $82,000.00 for bituminous surfacing covered seal CUU'inf und who! wuuM hup",,' if d.ivowuy. du nul cum. un ü" wuy uU' 'U the st eet. . (Dewey Ka ma ~ Seal coating is done by the City out of the General Fund; the maintenan e on a blacktopped street is minimal, so there is probably no more money expended than on the grading and up-keep of a gravel road. We blacktop to the pro erty line, and if there is, for instance, a ten foot gap, the property owner will be asked if he would want the contractor to fill in é:nd pay the costs himself. ) Asked Mr. Kasma what he recommended for the area; and noted that the residJnts were very skeptical about assessment policy because they had boo. fd 'u" "U muoh by lb. my uf Rum..y. H. olu'.d lbo! ol uno u'lb. meeti gs with the Township of Ramsey prior to incorporation, a Ramsey repre entative had stated, "why should we give them (Andover) any good roads, they are not giving us any". (Dewey Ka ma - Gravel is the minimum that I would recommend; and blacktop , is the way to go if you can afford it.) (Council person Rither _ There was nothingïn writing, however, there is now a written a1greement covering the payment of the $3,000 by Mr. Rus sell, and the provision that the City of Ramsey will furnish the labor and material to I Public Hearing lne 12, L J Minutes - Page L. spread the gravel; and the subsequent ordering of the Public Hearing when it was realiied that the $3,000 of Class #5 would not solve the problem. At one meeting bètween the Cities of Andover and Ramsey, the Ramsey City Council had noted that their plan for fixing these roads had they remained in their City, was 'to do the work, and assess the costs back to the people.) Linda Ruslell - 16805 Argon Street N. W. Asked when the gas lines would be coming through, and if the roads would have t" b:, torn up for this. (Councilperson Windschitl - I have contacted the Gas Co., and as of noon today, they stated that they would not be servicing your area in 1975. There present policy is that they will not service any quarter section unless they have existing pipe in the' ground-and the closest piping already in is 1 3/4 miles away from , your area (7th Avenue and Valley View). They stated that they will not disturb the blacktop (will go down the boulevard, and if it is necessary to cross a street, will go under). Noted that a blacktopped street would encourage the people to drive fister, which would make the streets more hazardous for children. Glen Rogels - 16647 Manniteau Blvd. N.W. Noted that a petition from the area residents had been given to the G~s Co., and was on a priority list-iile #1376. Asked if the City C~uncil had established a policy on seal coating. I (Mayor Schneider - no policy has been set, however, no-one has been charged to date.) ~ A ked if the Council had looked into a way of solving the problem wtthout Class #5 or blacktop. Noted that he had checked and found t at it might be necessary to remove the clay before any blacktopping c uld be done. (Dewey Ka ma - Yes, and there is no other way. As far as removing the clay before bla ktopping, this is done in some areas where the traffic is very heavy, or in new evelopment areas-the ideal way is 6" of Class #3, 4" of Class #5, and 1 1/2" of bituminous; but in this case we are looking at a minimum, not a maximum, to solve the problem, and something that will last at least ten years, as we ca~t re-assess for at least that period of time.) N ted that the City did not have equipment and the staff to maintain blacktopped streets. Asked what the interest rate is on the bonds; a d the figures on the engineering fees for the project; and are these fi ures included in the estimate. (Dewey Ka ma - The interest rate is 7% now-normal policy is to charge an additional % to cover administrative costs and for delinquent accounts. The engine ring fees are approximately 9% for basic engineering. The estimate sent to the residents includes an additional 15%; this includes engineering fees, attorney's ees, other legal fees, and administration costs; and a 10'70 contingency factor, plu the contractor's cost. If the bids come in much higher than the estimate, the City Council has the option of refusing them. ) I Public Hearing l June 12, 1975 1Jinutes _ FRge 3 Lloyd LaJy - 16627 Manniteau Street N. W. Asked if just the bad spots could be fixed; and questioned the calculation of assessable front footage on his lot. (Dewey K¿sma - The $3,000 could be spread; however if this were not enough to cover, there are and would be no additional monies available to purchase the needed gravel-the City Council has taken the position that they will not take monies from the general fund for improvement projects. If there is an error in c~lculation of lot size and it will be figured again. ) Asked if there was a definite guarantee that the residents would not be asses'sed for other improvement projects in the City on their general taxes! (Councilp~rson Windschitl _ It would be impossible to generate a tax levy , high enough to cover this type of project. ) (Councilperson Rither - While there is no definite policy, by virtue of action taken by the Council on May 6, 1975, it was recognized in the resolution ordering lb. "'bHJ Hwing ,"ul lbo Ci'y Cu..dl could nu' ",'lb."o CO"," Un lb. '0....1 levy. ) Ron Epso _ 16512 Zuni Street N. W. Aske~ for a guarantee to the residents that if they were assessed for this stree~ improvement, that no other street improvement in the City would go on the general taxes. (Dewey Kasma - The City Council has a proposed assessment policy in hand to be adop ed. They have taken the position that an improvement project cannot come out f general taxes _this is included in the proposal. ) Asked if 1 1/2" of bituminous was enough. Noted that he had lived in the area ince 1969, and had never had any problem getting in or out until recen ly; and contributed the cause being that the grader had pushed all the existing gravel into the ditches. (Dewey Ka1sma - 1 1/2" of bituminous matte allows for 50 heavy trucks per day. Th. g.... will ,o! mixed in =d ;m.h.d mund, und in, uu 5 you.. i' muy b. necesaary to re-do the roads in they are graveled now. ) Neil Powe 1 _ 16625 Argon Street N. W. A.kO! huw =ny .ood" wm nul in u,"",'ubl. condiliun-fd' lbo' "% woo. all ri ht. Noted that the grader was damaging the present roads. J. J. Cho en - 16438 Argon Street N. W. Noted that he had lived in the arffi for four years and had never had any troubl on the roads. Brad - Argon Street N. W. ASkedtwhY the project cost had increased from $5500.00 in 1974 to $32,0 0.00 now. (Councilpe son Windschitl _ The $5500.00 covered only two streets - Yakima and 166th Lane. ) Public Hearing ~ June 12, 1975 Minutes - Page '4 I Edward Coleman - Attorney for Mr. C. Russell Noted that Mr. Russell had given $3,000.00 per the Agreement, and now as per the: engineer's estimate, it was going to cost him another $20,000.00 to $25,000.00. Suggested a show of hands on what the residents wanted. Mayor scJneider called for a show orhands on l)Blacktop, 2) Gravel,3)Use Mr. Russell's $3,000 per the Agreement and fix the bad spots. Item #3 received a:nJ almost unanimous vote. I I Clyde Russell - 16518 Roanoke Street N. W. Suggested that he and the engineers go over the roads and find the bad spots 'and fix these only. , Clint pattlrson _ Ibb3b Manniteau Street N. W. Stated that he has not been able to get into his property for sometimes , . several days; and suggested that part of the $3,000.00 be used to flX this stretch of road. I Walter Arntzen - City Building Official and Road Supervisor - The City is . , spending tWice as much time grading the roads in the Rus sell area as they are in anyone other part of the City. Are the residents going to be satisfied if we only do a "patch" job? The Postmaster in Anoka wants the problem solved, an6 stated to me that if there were no satisfactory solutions after this Hearibg, the mailboxes may be moved out to 7th Avenue because they were havijg such a problem getting into the area. Councilpe I son Holasek - If we do just the minimum, what will happen next spring if tie roads get bad again. Don Anderson _ 16610 Zuni Street N. W. Stated that he had lived in the area since 1969, and even though he could get in o his place, he had helped several people who had gotten stuck just beyon hi slot. Dean Lipp - 16631 Zuni Street N. W. Stated that ditches and culverts should be put in to help take care of the water Wayne Rus.sell - 163rd Lane N. W. Noted 'that the roads were getting deeper ruts and harder to drive each week; and was in favor of at least graveling the roads per the proposal. Gonml di"'O".f ...u.d Un '""'" if "'lb Avonu, wo.. ¡.n uo, uf lb. p.oj.", Mr. Kasma stat d that $16,000 would cover the gravel and spreading of same in the balance of th area; however, this would not include any ditching, culverts, or engineering a, d administrative costs. Other discus sion covered the ability of emergency vehicles getting into the area, and the possibility of using a ":road-mix" of sand and rockl or cinders Several residents noted that they would rather have blacktop than gr~vel if given a choice. Public Hearing ;une l2, L .5 Minutes - Page 5 MOTION by VanderLaan, that the City Council direct the City Engineer to prepare final plans and ~pecifications for the construction of Class #5 gravel roads in the , entire Russell Addition as outlined in Mr. Kasma's letter of June 12, 1975. No second. The following persons suggested that the $3,000 be used to fix the streets as listed: D. Anderjon - 200' on Zuni Street between l65th and l66th. C. Patterson - 600' on Manniteau !'lvd. N.W. M. Gieseke - 500' on Yakima Street N. W. W. Russell _ 600' on South Zuni Street, 400' on 163rd Lane, and 200' on South I Argon Street. MOTION by Rither, seconded by VanderLaan, that the City Council direct the Engineer to prepare final1plans and specifications for construction of Class #5 gravel roads , throughout the Russell Addition, City of Andover, as outlined in a report to the , City Council, dated June 12, 1975, with the following exception: 165th Avenue N. W. from the interse'ction of 7th Avenue, westerly to Yakima Street. The residents wlre asked for a show of hands on 1) do they want the roads as stated in the aforementiorted motion, or would they rather have 2) blacktop. The majority of residents indicated that they would prefer Item #2. The question was asked of the engineer, that if] the roads were graded and graveled now, could they be blacktopped in a year or two with no additional gravel needed. Mr. Kasma informed the audience that additional gtavel would be required at the time of blacktopping. MOTION by Win schitl, seconded by Schneider, to table the motion made by Council person Rither, seconded by Councilperson VanderLaan, to a continued Public Hearing f Street Improvement in Russell Addition on June 18, 1975, 9 :00 P. M., And ver City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N. W. Vote: Yes, Schneider, VanderLaan, Wi dschitl; No, Holasek, Rither. Motion carried. Hearing continued to 9 :00 P. M., June 18, 1975 -- 11:55 P.M. Patricia K. Lin' quist Clerk/Treasure TKDJ\. TOm, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED I !:NOIN!:!:RS AND ARCHITECTS , 1408 PIONEER BUILDING ! SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA June 12, 1975 55101 224-7891 RICHAJltO M. BA~K[R OW!:N J. BEATTY OARREL. H. BERKOWITZ , ROBERT A. BOVE" JAMES C. BROTEN ARNOT J. OUVALL. !1UGO Q. aRICKSON WILLIAM J. ,'IEVDER ROYCE B. HANSEN STEPHEN M. HARTL.I£Y CLIII'FORD E. JOHN_Of'.¡ CuWAYN£ R. KASMA J. THOMAS KIRK CAVle W. K!RKWOLC A. DEAN LUNDHOLM "OBERT T. ~A'-ONEY "'CHARD D. MENKEN LII:ONAJltD O. MILLEA WAYNE A. OLSON DUANE T. PREW ~UDOL.PH p, RA.tTOR ROBERT R. RYOER WILL,,,,", T. SHERIDAN ABE J. SPERLING ARNOLD M. STEFf'r:S WALTER W. THORPE JAMES E. VOYEN NATHAN P. WEBER GEORGI!. J. SCHRO!.P,Eft Dear Resident: t::LIFFORD W. HAMBLIN ,he City Council i conducting a Public Hearing on June 12, 1975 at 9:00 P.M? to discuss the feas 'bility of constructing gravel or bituminous surfaced streets in the Russell Add tion, City of Andover. The attached map shows the location of these streets. T he following info mation is presented on the proposed project: 1) eet construction would be proposed for our area? A street projec in your area would include shaping the existing dirt streets to provide proper drainage and placing 4" of Class V gravel at a 20' width to provide a main ainablc driving surface. We have also included, as on al- ternate, the co struction of a 20' wide bituminous roadway at a 1-1/2" thickness. The life expect ney of the street, with proper sealcoating and crackfilling. is 10 to 20 yea s. 2) What is the pr posed time schedule of the City to install central sanitary sewer alld wat<jrmain systems in this area? f -.-¡ The City of An over Plan:,ing and Zoning Commission and City Council hav" complC'te the ComprehC'!Isiv" Development Plan for thC' City. '1'1,., Com lI,.'iwnHivl' PIA1\ l'o1\tain~ an Urhan Pla\\nin~ DiHtl'irt whi<'h ,'onHi"IH 01 111.. I"nd /oI1,,,i'rally "ollth of Honnd Lak,' and Andovl'" 1101I1..vn,'d. Thi" aI"'", ¡ ! , i I I June 12, 1975 , I . I Page Two , , I is proposed to be served by sanitary sewe rs in the near future by an existing I I , ! Metropolitan Sewe r Line located on C rooked Lake Boulevard at the south line of Andover. I i A recently completec1 Metropolitan Sewer Board study states that the plan for serving Andove~ should be modified to provide for limiting long range utilization of the Metropolitan Interceptor to an urban planning district located in the Southwest area bf the City within a boundary determined by the City. In summary, tht area in which you live is not planned to be served through any existing intJrceptor sewers. It will be many years, probably the year , 2000, before sanitary sewers or any watermain systems are considered for for your area. I . 3) What steps are necessary to get the work dOl1e? The following stlps are necessary for the completion of the project: , ! , , I í ! , A) City Counci~ hold Public Hearing June 12, 1975 B) City Council orders project, authorizes i Engineer t1 prepare plans and specifications June 12, 1975 ! C) Engineer s bmits plans for Council approval, and receive's authorization to advertise for bids I July 15, 1975 I D) City Council receives bids and awards contracts August 5, 1975 E) Contractor begins construction August 11, 1975 F) Contractor completes construction October 1, 1975 G) City Engin¥r prcpares final cost estimates and assess ent roll October 1, 1975 H) City councr conducts assessment hearing. Any errors or adjustments in assessments are made a this meeting. October 14, 1975 I) City Counc'l passes resolution accepting asseBBmen roll and directs Clerk to file I with Anoka County Auditor before October , , 15, 1975. October 14, 1975 4) How much will the street project cost me? The City Engin~er has prepared a preliminary cost estimate and feasibility report on the proposed project. I The preliminary cost estimate for gravel surfacing is $ 32,3000.00 and for , , I I I I , , "_(Ie 12, 1975 I , , Page Three I I I bituminous surfa~ing is $82,2000.00. I The entire cost of this improvement would be assessed on an adjusted front footage basis to all abutting properties. Adjusted front footages will include provisions for corner lots and irregular shaped lots. I Based on the preliminary cost estimates and a total frong f~ota!5f of 19,100 , 32 00 feet, the front foot assessment for gravel streets would b"!9 {oo.t 1 = $1. 75/F.F. and for bituminous streets would be 4~2, 200 T= $4.50 IF. F. ' I ,¡OU F The assessment for an average lot 200 feet in width would then be 200 feet times $1. 75 equals $350.00 for gravel or 200 times $4.50 equals $900,00 for bituminous const~uction. The assessment could be paid in full, or paid on an installment ba'sis with property taxes over a 10 or 15 year period. The annual charges, based on an assessment and 80/, annual interest, would be as follow s: ¡ Year Grave' Street Construction Bituminous street con~t~~_~.~i0L.._ 10 yea'r 15 yea r 10 year 15 year I Assessments Assessments Assessments Assessments 1976 I $51.33 $162,00 $132.00 $63,O~ 1977 60.2 I 49.46 154.80 127.20 1978 57.40 47.64 147.60 122.40 ¡ , 1979 54.60 45.77 140.40 117.60 1980 51.80 43.90 133.20 112.80 1981 49.00 42.03 126.00 108.00 1982 46.20 40.16 118.50 103.20 1983 43.4C 38.29 111.60 98.40 1984 40.6C , 36.42 104.40 Q3.60 1985 37.8C 34.55 97.20 88.00 1986 32.68 84.00 1987 30.81 79.20 1988 28.93 I 74.40 1989 27.06 69.60 1990 i 25.20 ¡ 64.80 I 'I W~<OiO[ '0' !hi, Hmo! Tht' ('onatru{,tioo indutitry prict'" havt' l'ontih\U' to l"iHt' in 11\(· paHt yt'<l 1"/"1 , ólnd tl (· 011110,,1, Is {OJ "ontinu"d hl!(h<,r p1'Ì<,,·s. TIH' En!(in<'<'rinh N"WH H"""rd Cost Index, whic,h is a national publication that indicates cost trends in "0"- une 12, 1975 Page Four struction, lists ¡the following increases in recent years ba.sed on $100.00 worth of construction in 1965: Year ]?ase of $100.00 Percent increases per year 1965 $ 100.00 1966 103.87 3.9 1967 108.90 4.8 1968 116.07 6.6 1969 127.64 10.0 1970 136.60 7.0 1971 152.98 12.0 1972 173.74 13.6 1973 190.84 9.8 1974 202.19 5.9 If a project is needed, it is reasonable to proceed with the project as soon as )ossible to obtain ~he benefit of the improvement, since the interest at 80/, will probably be less t an the annual increased construction cost. As your City COn~Ulting Engineers, we hope this letter answers some of your questions regarding this proposed street project. Very truly yours, TOLTZ, KlliG, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ~~j1:t:.f:K~ DRK:vlo cc: Mrs. Pat indquist, Clerk-T reasure r Mr. Walt r Arntzen, Building Inspector Andover ity Council -. . . . , : : ; ¡ i i . . : : ; . I I : ,. " . . : : ¡ ; ',0, '1" I I I I I . ; I I I I . ::::111 ~.._ I ; . - . : : : , , . . ! . r _ " ., : : "IN' 0 '. ,'" ' , ..'.."" '. ""'::'''' , ,., :.. . : : ! i ; , , .or ,',' 1 II I ,\:rL .. ",' '.'.) I. '. J ' j , ~.' 1 ' "h, ¡ r;---.r~' "---, _ "--'-.11 , :,,!, 1 '1);:[: i --1-- ~~_.I~ ,I . :-1 ,: -f31 ~ 'I, : 1 l (' 1'( I ·"1 Ì',: ' II I I . . , , \' _ .-::' , , , II I , 'I: I 'r-- ¡_ ,- "', '" " '--.- '.'ó' I , iI I ',II, " ,'-I '-', , -- 'I" I'" ' 'r~'" .., --, -.- - '" , " .- "'.1, f ' , I I' I '-,~, . , , , ~ ., ,,\-.., i. 1+-, - - -" 'i RQm .:.:: ;"1 rli1-ì~f~,1\'~ i - ¡ 1'1 I ¡ I. . I : 1¡1 .rri I .- t 1 ! I I I \ -...., I' II'. ., " j , .- .w I í ]--' l r' " I , . .= 'I " :., " 1 1 I ". '-if"l, , .- 11 , 'iL/ I' I '1/ '. I f I "__";11 'III .., '", ¡ . , , I ¿. ~ ~~. ..:- -L__' 1_ ' '" ~,- '. 1 ¡ ,.... :1fi~¡ , . _ ~ :: . 'I ;, ,iLl .. I --t-+ " 1"" . I i~l I .. ',;. ,. " " ., ..- 1 . " I, , , . "I .- -. 'I ' , '" I :1 ".... " 01é., --, - , I " '" --111'" ,- I' T 1 1 I ! " ,i U, ,¡,,\ l!:;~ II ~fntfl ' \ I'TWiI~, ¡\ r Hi ý& -- , 1'1 , , l'OI,:r ,I" f~. _,_ - . I I I. I I' ":"'''1' ""I' . _ -, - '. " " ., - ' . - , , -.'-,. \ :'1 ,"" .~ , I - -, r . ..0'\\' .= I¡ ,I",S!....' . i ',-,,", -- " ", ,.. I 'I I~\j, I f~ __ .fuH","',.¡ \ " ...." '''---,. , " "'t;,-,~'" I I '-- ~'r'i: \ I I "".'''''"", / ......, I ! ,...~-" ~ I It) I I !.::. ' ¡ r-- ~:¡ I (\, ~j 1 ;r; I _,~_~~~__. -.1' I (!) '.~ ßz : FU I 1 ô~ =: I ~'š ~ ~ .- -' -- wt- ~w ! ~ffi ~~ i 0> 0:::1- ~8 en -z t> Uet ~~ 00::1 8:et , . I""''''·r~,'· I L J ----- --.. ~ -- " I -- ,.. - --' . I ,- I - ____"_~_., I, _ ."_ I68TÞf.VI NW r c .. I . . ~ I 4 __ _ _ ,. , IU'tM AVE "¡W ' I I ~ I i ' ;¡, ' . _. DENOTES STREETS TO I BE CONSTRUCTED I I , , , 1.__ 'u_ '____ ____,+ I ' , ¡... , -- i c.:: RUSSEL ADDITI N -- -.. . - -,..,-- l- STREET SURFAC NG I -' . i , , ~i'-~ ~ --,--i~Lrl ~~ ~ !: Î-~-:-- 'fJ/27/7'fJ _O-r - c - , , , I ) I