HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP May 6, 1974
(3~()W T()WNSIiII)
Minutes of SPECIAL MEETING of the Grow Township Board of Supervisors held May 6,
1974 at 7:00 p.m., a~ the Grow Town Community Center. Attending were, Chairman
Schneider, Supervisor Christenson, Attorney Hawkins.
Keeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m., by Chairman Schneider who noted one
Supervisor absent.,
Discussion was initiated on street names On the western edge of the Township. Supervisor
Christenson, the Road Overseer, noted Dick Bune, Representative of Chamberlain Equity
Corporation, who would like the names of three (3) streets changed that pass through
their development, " Meadowood ". Mr. Bune has checked with Anoka County and there
is no opposition. The Supervisors present agreed there would be no problem. The
alphabet letters to be changed will be: K - L - M formerly, Kiowa - Lipan - Makah.
These streets will now be: KISSIMER - LARRABLE and MENOMINEE. Oak Grove Township
may have some streets that line up with these. Grow wiìl notify this Township by
letter and a copy of these minutes will accompany the letter. Mr. Bune and the county
of Anoka will also be notified. A copy of this letter will be attached to these minutes
as: ITEM - A.
Minor discussion insued on the Misslin Bridge matter with Attorney Hawkins to have
all information available on this matter at the monthly Town Board Meeting On May 14,
1974.
Minor discus,sion on Road Maintenence - ten (10) minutes.
Discussion on Cedar Crest Park Site with Chairman Schneider noting he received a call
from Robert Rither, who noted with some concern that Township property - black dirt,
was being removed from the Park Site by Mr. Tim Dahmen, 3921 174th Avenue Northwest.
Mr. Dahmen explained to Rither that "Sylvia" of the Parks/Recreation Advisory Board
told him he could have the dirt he wanted. According to Rither a dump truck and
"Bob Cat" ,were being used in removal. Mr. Dahmen stated he had a witness, Jim Green
to "Sylvia" stating they could have it. Attorney Hawkins noted if unauthorized removal
had been done, it would have to be replaced or paid for by someone.
Supervisor Christenson questioned what authority Sylvia Britton had to give out
Township materials and if in fact, she did, he would take a load for his yard.
Chairman Schneider was concerned also and was trying to reach "Sylvia" and Mr. Dahmen.
He C6told net reaeh"Syl"ia"and Mr, n"hm",n was probably "ut 1Po·,i1\8 dirt.
Rither also noted to Chairman Schneider he felt Mr. Dahmen was acting under direction
given to him and he had no idea she had no authority to do this. Rither will send a
letter to the Town Board on this matter, a copy will be attached to these minutes also,
to fill in what was missed. The letter will be attached to these minutes as: ITEM -B.
Later in this evening, May 6, 1974 Chairman Schneider reached "Sylvia" by telephone
and directed her to proceed to Site and retrieve situation.
Minutes - May 6, 1974
Page 2
Supervisor Christenson opened discussion on new legislation allowing elected officials'
to get mileage for miles traveled on Township Official Business; Chapter 143, S.F.
No. 3085, an Act relating to towns; officers' compensation and mileage allowance;
amending Minnesota Statutes 1971, Section 367.05 Subdivision 2; repealing Minnesota
Statutes 1971, Sections 367.05, Subdivision 4; 367.06; 367.07; and 367.08. Hereby
referred to in these minutes as Chapter 143. Attorney Hawkins noted this legislation
can be acted on at any time by the Board. A copy will be attached to these minutes as;
ITEM C.
Minor discussion on Township Building with Hawkins noting Champlin has had many problems
with there building project. Chairman Schneider noting he would have liked to seen a
concrete structure. Supervisor Christenson noting the steel building was flexible if
additions were initiated.
Chairman Schneider moved agenda on to Planner's bill with Supervisor Christenson asking
if we had any more data on bill from Otto. Chairman Schneider stated we have same
information we had at the May 1, 1974 meeting with Mr. Schmid. Chairman Schneider
noted the more he studied it, the more confused he got. Supervisor Christenson felt
we should ask Schmid fo~ a detailed break-down of time spent on Technical Assistance
for auditing purposes. He is not sure the items we are reviewing were submitted for
these purposes.
Supervisor Ho1asek arrived at approximately 8:00 p.m. and entered discussion by stating
he felt the Board should have copies of Plan before Planning Commission is through with
their reviewal. Supervisor Christenson notes the order in which these things are done,
is so the Planning Commission can be sure it contains what they have been working on
for the past year, nor more, no less. Supervisor Ho1asek noted he could not attend
most Planning Meetings and felt Schmid's Firm was paid right along for this Plan and
also felt maybe some money should have been held back until Plan was reviewed. Supervisor
Christenson noted review of the Comprehensive Development Plan took place at every
single meeting held by the Planning Commission and the Planner and noted absence of
Town Board Official's from these public held meetings should not be used as a basis
for determining whether the Planner had performed his duty or not and secondly noted
the amount of money contracted for is not in question, the TA Account is the one that
seems to be in question.
Discussion on the May 1, 1974 meeting with Otto insued with Supervisor Holasek noting
Schmid should have been able to answer these questions. Supervisor Christenson defended
Schmid by noting, to recall these off the top of his head would be impossible. Supervisor
Ho1asek noted he was called out here for that expressed purpose. Clerk Art Jaworski
notes of events, telephone conversation with Schmid requesting he appear, was answered
by let~er reacting to conversation and noted this had been discussed before. All Town
Board Members received letter, with Chairman Schneider noting he did not have background
because of not being on the Board at the time.
Clerk Art Jaworski relayed message that the Board wanted him to explain his bill more
thoroughly. Clerk noted this was done and Mr. Schmid did appear. Supervisor Christenson
noted subsequently to this, the Law Firm told Otto Schmid he did not have to appea&.
It is noted that Chairman Schneider did not on his own ask for Otto to come out, it
was a Board decision made on April 17, 1974 to have Otto Schmid, Lary Carlson ( past
Board Chairman ) , the Attorney and the present Board, together to go over this matter.
Supervisor Christenson noted that there are contradictions that have to be ironed out
and felt that, yes these items should be scrutinized.
Minutes - May 6, 1974
Page 3
Supervisor Holasek felt another meeting and letter at this late time asking again for
clarification is not necessary. Item tabled until after Road Maintenence Contract is
discussed with BurtOn Kraabel, 14717 Andover Blvd. N.W., Anoka, Minnesota.
Chairman Schneider noted to the Board and Kraabel, the Attorney allowed by State
Statute, we could contract with Kraabel without advertising for bids and that the Board
was meeting with him for this purpose. Attorney Hawkins briefly explained the Contract
noting this maintenence agreement and also noting for small projects, we could write
work orders. Kraabel stated this is the way it should be done.
To put things in prospective for the Attorney, Supervisor Christenson noted the Board
is in agreement to seek other Engineering advice. Attorney Hawkins asked if Consulting
Engineers Diversified Inc., had been notified. Supervisor Christenson noted nothing has
been done yet, so they haven't been notified. (Subsequent conversations by Chairman
Schneider, Supervisor Christenson, Supervisor Holasek and Attorney Hawkins are not
needed for this record to be accurate. They are on tape and are opened to public record.)
Attorney Hawkins will check on Contract, if any with CED and notify Clerk and Board
Members.
After reviewing Contract, Kraabel's only objection was to the insurance section
requiring one million ($1,000,000) dollars coverage. Supervisor Holasek noted high
rates in effect for excavators. Attorney Hawkins noted this was subject to Board approval.
Supervisor Christenson noted that because of Contract, Kraabel could not be construed
as an employee, therefore Kraabel's insurance should be adequate to cover him. Attorney
Hawkins will put Contract in order and send copy to Kraabel for signing. Copies will
be sent to Supervisors and Clerk's Office for attachement to these minutes as ITEM 4,
original will be kept on file at Clerk's Office.
Snowplowing will be discussed with Kraabel as Season approaches. Kraabel noted with
fast changing situation as far as cost of gasoline, etc., he would prefer this.
Materials Section of Contract will be posted in Anoka Union and bids asked for. This
section when received by Clerk's Office, from Attorney will be held until direction
from the Board.
Minor discussion on maintenence and reapir projects for rural areas using cinder mixture
or class 5 (five) . It was noted the cost differential for these was $3,000 per mile
for cinder, tlay mixture, $8,000 per mile for class 5 (five). Supervisor Chirstenson
noted we should try it on Jay Street. Supervisor Holasek noted we should try it in
rural areas like Ward Lake Drive or Prairie Road.' General discussion on whether the
cinder, clay mixture would be too dirty for subdivision road rep,irs.
Minor discussion on Park work done by Kraabel with Kraabel noting what should be done
to finish up ball diamond at l4lst and Yukon and in the "~' at Green Acres. The Board
was unanimous in having Kraabel do what is necessary to finish these two Parks.
Miscellaneous discussion on road matters including; 1.) Nightengale- County should be
notified to upkeep this road. 2.) Repair of tar streets - Supervisor Christenson
should notify Hornsby at Anoka County and have them swing in and fix ours and bill us
at the end of the year.
Kraabel left at this time and the Planners bill was picked up again.
Minutes - May 6, 1974
Page 4
Supervisor Holasek noting he would go along with Attorney's suggestion we scrutinize
bill, send Firm a letter confirming what we are willing to pay and allow them to react.
After much discussion and repeated statements by all. Attorney Hawkins went over
information we have, noting what he thought should be paid, what should not be paid
and what should be questioned. Supervisor Holasek moved to have the Attorney cDntact
Otto Schmid to note Boards position. Attorney Hawkins interrupted Supervisor Holasek
and stated he would tell the Board first hand what would be in the letter and proceeded
to do so. Supervisor Holasek again moved to authorize Attorney Hawkins to make a
proposal to the Planning Firm and Otto Schmid, based on the findings put together this
evening and allow Nason Wehrman Chapman and Associates or Otto Schmid to respond.
Second by Supervisor Christenson; , Carried unanimously. A copy of this letter will be
attached to these minutes as ITEM 5 (five).
Chairman Schneider made a motion to adjourn. Supervisor Holasek and Supervisor
Christenson continued conversation, with this Attorney Hawkins pointing out; this
motion allows for no further discussion; second by Supervisor Holasek. Carried.
Meeting adjourned at 10:35 p.m.
~~~
-+' -Ie. rY) fl
, G7("VW T()WUU§hmp
1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD, N.W.
ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303
(612) 755·5100
May 23, 1974
Mr. Ernest Knutson
RR 1,1
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
Dear Mr. Knutson:
I am writing to inform you that Mr. David Fricke from Chamberlain Equity
Corporation appeared at the Grow Township Board Meeting on May 6, 1974 to
request three (3) street names to be changed in their development of
Meadowood.
Meadowood is in the western edge of Grow Township.
The streets that were formerly Kiowa, Lipan and Makah, are now Kissmer, Larrable
and Menominee.
Mr. Fricke stated to our Board Members that they had talked to Anoka County
and they did not object to these changes.
If you have streets that line up with these, please inform us by letter at
the above address.
I will be looking forward to your reply.
~'
Clerk Grow Township
AJ/mk
CC: David Fricke
Anoka County Surveyor
,..." .- _..J- '/ I'- "i , l-.d
" , ''-':
May 6, 1974 "
17410 Blackfoot St ~Ñ
Anoka, Minn. 55303
lfæ. Richard J. Schneider, Chairman
Grow Township Board of Supervisors
1343 Andover Blvd. NW
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
Dear Mr. Schneider:
This letter confirms our telephone conversation this evening and
brings to your attention a situation I have observed in the Town-
ship park in Cedar Crest Estates, First Addition.
On Sunday, May 5, 1974 about 3:00 O'Clock P.M., I detected some
type of activity resembling the moving about of machinery and the
like in the pond area of the Cedar Crest park, which is across
the street from my home. It seemed odd that someone should be
working on our park sites on a Sunday so I went over to investi-
gate. \vhat I discovered was odd, indeed. Briefly, this is what
I found:
1. A tractor with front end loader on the north end of the
pond.
2. An area immediately in front of the loader, and in the
dredged pond material, which had recently been excavated.
3. A dump truck, which was equipped with what I estimate
to be a five yard box, in the area of the front yard of
a resident whose property abutts the park land on the
south end of the pond (Mr. Tim Dahmen, 3921 174th Ave N\V).
4. The dump box of the truck was in the raised position.
5. A pile of dirt on the ground immediately beneath the
open end of the raised dump box.
Obviously, it did not take long to make the necessary connections.
lf~. Dahmen, the truck driver (whose name I did not obtain) and I
chatted amicably. Mr. Dahmen stated that he and Mr. Jim Green
(a neighbor of ours who was not present) had been told by "Sylvia"
at a recent Park Advisory Board meeting that they could take all
the dirt they wanted.
Some important questions come to mind. Is the project at the
Cedar Crest pond complete? If the answer is no, will additional
soil now be needed to maintain the proposed grade? If the answer
is yes, has the finished grade now been destroyed, requiring
adàiticnal work and Township expenditures? Has the Township Board
of Supervisors declared the material removed surplus and if so
when? "¡,[ho is "Sylvia" and what is her official capacity, functio:1,
and authority in 'Grow Township? Has the Township Board of Super-
visors taken offici~l action to grant "Sylvia" authority to
disDose of or distribute, free of charge, any Township property
or ~aterials in any form, shape, or condition, whether declared
surplus or not? . If no" authority is so vested in "Sylvia"
'f:
to èispose of Tow~ship property, what Board action is anticipated
to recover the property or the reasorlable value thereof? There
are probably many more questions which could be raised but the
foregoing list will help to underscore the seriousness of the
situation.
I do not know how much material has been removed from the pond
area although as I indicated to you on the telephone this evening,
the removal continues. On Sunday afternoon I estimated seeing
approximately three, five yard loads of Township "property" on
the property at 3921 174th Ave h~v. The truck driver estimated
the value of from between $20 to $25 per load. As of this
writing there is appreciably more dirt removed and as it is
distributed about the lot, I am unable to make an estimate.
If we assume that the soil is not needed at the Cedar Crest site,
why should "it not be trucked to the Community Center site, stoc:ç-
piled, and used for the anticipated landscaping project at that
location? We find ourselves in the rather ludicrous position of
selling cheap and buying dear.
If the B.oard of Supervisors did not authorize (and, you indicated
on the telephone that this is the case) this apparently irrespons-
ible give away of Township property, then the Township must either
recover the material or the reasonable and just value thereof.
It is reasonable to assume that all Township property has some
value whether it be a fôlding chair, a pencil, a light bulb, or
a pile of dirt. In principle, none of us is authorized to
misappropriate a single postage stamp. Returning the soil to
its original location ,raises an interesting question; are there
others who carted away soil Ìl'1'.the mistaken belief that the offer
of free dirt for the hauling was bona fide and authorized by the
, Board of Supervisors? It appears that those who have helped them-
selves acted imprudently. However, I am hard pressed to fault
them for having acted on what they thought was a genuine offer.
They were led to believe that what they were doing was in every
sense properly authorized. They are, in a sense, victims of
circumstance. If it is impractical, if not impossible, to
recover the material and those who took the material were misled,
then it is apparent that the options are narrowed considerably.
Simply stated, the individual who had no apparent authority
to give the Township material away must make restitution for
the full value of the material. The Township should settle for
nothing less.
As I indicated to you on the ,telephone on ¡'lay 6, 1974, I request
that the removal of this soil be stopped as ,soon as possible
and that this matter be given a full public discussiorl at the
ne¿t regular Board of Supervisors meeting to be held May 14, 1974.
In addition, I ask that the Board request the presence at the
meeting of the following individuals:
"Sylvia"
¡VIr. Jim Griswold
Mr. Tim Dahmen
IVJr . Jim Green
I view this matter as a serious breach of the public trust.
It is not a pleasant matter---someone talks out of turn, someone
acts on misinformation, the relations of a neighborhood are
somewhat strained, and the Board is burdened with another
problem which could have been avoided. I am hopeful that the
Board will resolve the matter quickly and in so doing assure
the Townspeople that a similar occurrence will not befall us
in the future.
As for "Sylvia", I understand that she serves in some capacity
on the Park Advisory Board. This whole affair raises some
doubt in my mind as to the responsibility that such a position
carries and the ability of this individual to discharge it.
It is something you should think about.
SiZ;;;'a ~øJ
Robert A. Rither
cc: Marvin Christenson
Winslow Holasek
Art Jaworski
Ymrilyn Kappelhoff
Walter Arntzen
James Griswold
William Hawkins
Timothy Dahmen
James Green
Janett Eveland
.
, ..1-- j ...,/JÎ c. r f' at\1itfít1 ~ ø.<1' ~fi'/;~
j' ~öüä ,',it ),;,' (", ,1,,',:',,.,";,.
, I ,~ôl h~f', '~~~~~,!(\ ~ ì¡¡i.\.iI~ '.
,
\ '
~ i SECOND REGULAR SESSION Ch. 143
, " t V,·"''''',:c....·
.,' - , ~, 0' I
, .
¡',.' CONVEYANCE OF STATE LANDS-OWATONNA
.'" I
!
I CHAPTER 142
S,F.No.3085
" I
[Not Coded]
An Act relating to state government: authorizing a conveyance of certain t
state owned lands to the city of Owatonna and specifying terms and con-
ditions thereof.
I Appro\'ed March ]3, 1074. !
TOWN~FFICERS--COMPENSATION AND MILEA=-l r
¡ 1
r
I ,.:
CHAPTER 143 I
I
, S.F,No.3151 ¡
!-" An Act relating to towns; officers' compensation and mileage allowance;
: amending Minnesota Statutes 1971, Section 367.0.5, Subdivision 2; repeal- r
I Ing Mlnnes()ta Statutes 1971, Sections 367.0.5, Subdivision 4¡ 367.06 ;
367.07: and 367,08.
, , \
Be it cnacted. by the Le{Jislature of thc State of Jlill1!C8ota:
\ Section ]. :L\1innesota Statutes lOil, Section 367.05, Subdivision 2, is nmcnd~
ed to rcad:
Subd. 2. Officers. At the annual town meeting the electors of nny town
shaH þy majority vote estnblish such compensation for supervisors as the
¡ eJectors deem proper, any other Jaw notwithstanding, The town board of any
"- I town 51mB establish compensation for the cJerk as the town board deems prop-
er, Siny other la,v not\V'ith5tanding.
In additIon to such compensation as [.;hall be proviùed pursuant to this sub~
, diylsion, Rupen·fsors and clerks shall be entitled to mileage at a rate not to ¡'
I excecd 15 ccuts pel' miIe for c(1('11 mile ncccssarH,}' traveled on official busi· I
ness trithin or without the town as cstaoIished by it town meeting.
The ,'oters nt any town meeting, after reading and disposing of the annual
, 1 T(>port~ may, by resoluUon fix the scnle of wages ltnù hours of employment of
" the road on~n;eer and o~ any other person employed by any town on any town [,
;) road.
, Sec. 2. Repealer. Minnesota Statutes 1071, Sections 361.05, Subdivision 4; ¡
\ 367.06; 367.07; and 367.08 Qrc repealed.
Sec. 3. Effeotlve dat,. This act is etfectiye the day following its final
4JDactment.
Approved March 13, 1$14. \,
. .
I I
,~ 173 f
-,
¡. . :'._,)' , .-ì ì
t
~ .
. . I ~ .~__'-.,:f<
~.'1w~~";,' , ~ t .... .
I
~,' "1"" '~!.~~':lJV'~~~I~~kl'f)~~fiw:wrr~I!!!r'lSI"ì'111.'¡~:~J'~f:,:91'1!1;r'~'\<~:-;C"!H' ~\~',~~'. 'Ir. '·1· .¡¡'4't·i-r'w.'Mff~~r::f 'I.'.W',"·~f,¡.';"':!':',f"'fi¡' f"',\,,~f;'P:! ~,' I~~
-
~ 'M\ ,~,.-( ..,'-~ '~"...":'~"'¡-':' .;,~¡,~.."". .~":""~....: '''>', ~-::----
."'" {. ...__ ~.,,~ :(I" "".... ~"'. ~_"~,, ;.,~...~...,,' Y:.. " f' ."_1,,, .... .., jf ' ''',. ,. '_ '
-- ___ '" ~ ~ ...."".'....~ ,'''',. ~.~".:lIJ.~.JIè~,.,.¥~~¡:'~ ;.¡ "ç..,,:,): ':. ,:;{l~ ~'" .f,~ ' 0-1,., ,_::1. i.. "", JI'¡'-.' 1-.....r. ....~.¡:,...~... .. . ,," ". '"
,. - ~-.. "\:::";'.f'-;;':':,¡'::':J7~:~¡;Í<:~~"'i~"i!'.).;-.~I'.f.~+I."" ·",,_':"t;;.t,1if'''Jo'':'',~·~_ '~ß!".2''r..;:;1.. ..~.\.... '~·If'f'..'.\""~t.;.",,........µ,.·· ........"'" .
"'-1:':.""...J-r.-op.;·~.:'·\<,(.f'.,·~r"~·-'o;~1 ..,...."''A._........ ...ç< ",t ~'.l.":S'£""." ~~:-:t.,(",,.,...._.þ. "" -'~"'-"'1·.....1'''' {.~...'.,., O)...~' µ" .~>..J", - ..,
'S::- ,,~_.. ,.~~......,.... "'-' .+.i¡:,¡.... '~'"~~~''' n;;..,(~"t' ,I, .··"...\'o"'''''''i''''f'~'A, ,.~ ." ...... " '
~~':>~~~~r"'<""~" .....\it'.. ,~..~....^'~,,'::~..., ~".~':~;::.t>:-..j"'~, ¡;:'\.....\¥ ~ ~'·~"'.f~..,,">.~\~:t.?'; :"':!~.~~ \ ;" ::.,.' :";.....$/",,' 11':r þ' ~,.' r..' ...;..,.....),.1 ,.¥ ~,." " _.-:..._...~.~._...._._..
~:.., ~~. ">''::fJ': ':t..-...7~'(....t~t~,.::........."'f.'~~;"'" ·Xf"\'Ir>',,,'V"':h "\. ~",.., \~ , -: ,~. ~. 1 .
..þ / ;;:://'
BABCOCK. LOCHER. NEILSON & MANNELLA
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
118 EAHT MAIN STREET
ANORA. MINNESOTA G5303
EDMUND P. BABCOCK TEL. 421-5151
LANDOL J. LOCHER AREA CODE 612
JAMES M. NEILSON
FELIX A. MANNELLA
JOHN R. SPEAKMAN
RICHARD BEENS
ROBERT F. MANNELLA
JOHN M. BURKE
WILLIAM G. HA WIUNS
RONALD B. PETERSON
JAN D. HALVERSON
May 8, 1974
Otto Schmid
NASON WEHRMAN CHAPMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
1415 Lilac Drive
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422
Dear Mr. Schmid:
The Grow Township Board has requested that I write to you in an effort
to resolve the balance due on our account with your firm for work
performed as a result of our incorporation activities. In order to
prevent any misunderstanding as to the Township's position in this
matter, I will set out in detail the facts, letters and discussions
upon which we base our proposal for settlement. If there is any
misunderstanding on our part and you feel the need to provide us with
more explanation, I certainly would be available to meet with you or
any other members of your firm in an effort to resolve this matter.
On February 17, 1973, the Township of Grow entered into a Contract
with your firm whereby you agreed to provide us with certain technical
advice and assistance in connection with the undertakings by the
Township relating to community planning. At the time this agreement
was entered into, it was known by all parties involved that Grow
Township had filed a Petition for Incorporation and, therefore, such
activities would be a part of our community planning. Specific
reference was made in the Contract concerning your firm's
participation in the incorporation activites. Under Exhibit A,
there is a statement that "appearances will be made before the
Minnesota Municipal Commission as requested. " Secondly, under
Exhibit B of the Contract there is a statement that "completion of
Stage I and Stage II activities will constitute documentation
necessary for incorporation activities or viable alternatives. "
Finally, there is a provision in the Contract that the study program
will be performed over a twelve month period and will involve two
monthly meetings with the communities' officials and citizenry. It
is these specific provisions of the Contract that I feel are
controlling in this situation.
May 8, 1974
Page 2
On September 11, 1973, you wrote a letter to our then Town Board
Chairman, Lawrence B. Carlson, stating that "due to the nature of the
planning study, we do not wish to use time allotted in that program
for additional services relating to the MMC Hearings over and above
what the Contract calls for." "For this purpose, I am asking the Grow
Town Board authorize us to assist your legal staff, as they may see
fit, in preparing exhibits, documents, and providing testimony."
Furthermore, in this letter you indicated that at that time you had
approximately $415.00 in planner's time expended in items not covered
by the planning contract and estimated as a minimum, another 20 to
30 hours being expended through the hearing date. Based upon your
billing rate which you indicate in your letter of January 29, 1974, as
being $20.00 per hour, this estimate would have resulted in a cost to
the Township outside the original Contract of approximately $1,000.00.
In an effort to obtain an explanation as to why the current bill
submitted by your firm for matters of incorporation was approximately
$2,300.00, the Town Board met with you on several occasions to discuss
this matter. At these meetings and in subsequent letters, you set
out the matters and time spent which constituted the bill for $2,300.00.
I make reference to the itemized time breakdown that you submitted on
January 8th as well as the chronological breakdown of all meetings
attended by Mr. Steven Reckers and yourself in regard to our
incorporation activities.
In your itemized time breakdown, there appears to be a number of hours
expended by office assistants and technical personnel for typing,
drafting of exhibits and data collection. It is the position of Grow
Township that such technical and office assistants' work is covered
under the initial planning contract whereby you indicated all
documentation necessary for incorporation activities would be provided.
The data, maps and exhibits that were presented at the MMC Hearings
appear to be essentially the same items that were to be provided under
the Stage I and Stage II phases of the Contract.
Next, I would like to focus on the meetings which Mr. Reckers and you
attended in regard to our incorporation activities. My examination
centers around your letter of January 29, 1974, which specifically
indicates all of the meetings attended. I am referring to this letter
as opposed to the general itemized time breakdown submitted on January
8th since there seems to be some discrepancy between the number of hours
listed on the original itemized time breakdown submitted to the Board
and those in your letter of January 29, 1974. It is the feeling of the
Town Board that there are several meetings which Mr. Reckers and you
attended that were either covered under the Contract or the time which
was charged to the Township was not justified.
---_.- -._----
May 8, 1974
Page 3
In your letter of January 29, you indicate attendance at Grow
Planning Commission Meetings on October 2, November 6 and December
18, 1973. Our records indicate that during the months of October,
November and December of 1973, you attendea two meetings each month
as required under the Contract. However, dates of the meetings
attended under the Contract and those billed separately are the same
and, therefore, the Township feels this duplication should not be
included in the bill.
On October 26, 1973, you indicate attendance at an interview with the
Anoka County Assessor and at the Ramsey Incorporation hearing by Mr.
Reckers and you resulting in twelve hours of time. The Board feels
that it would have only been necessary for one planner to attend these
meetings. The Township certainly can understand your need to be aware
of the incorporation activities of Ramsey since they were directly related
to our MMC Hearings, however, we question the necessity of having
two planners present. Finally, on December 19 and January 28, 1974,
there is a bill for attendance at MMC Hearings which appear to be
clearly covered by the original Contract provisions.
Therefore, excluding the hours spent on documentation and meetings
required under the Contract, there would be a total of 46 hours
remaining. At your quoted rate of $20.00 per hour, this would total
the sum of $920.00. In addition, you have indicated expenses of
$311.00 consisting of mileage, prints, xerox, meals, et cetera. It
is the Township's feeling that items such as prints and xerox costs
would be included under the documentation provision of the Contract.
Since we have no basis to determine what other expenses were involved
a figure of $80.00 was arbitrarily picked for mileage incurred as a
result of attendance at meetings.
It is upon this analysis of the above information that the Township
feels it is responsible to your firm for the amount of $1,000.00 outside
the original Contract price. As I indicated at the outset of my
letter, I would be willing to meet with you or any other representative
of your office if you feel this is necessary to discuss this further.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
>J"lk1'v h'0 .1:J i-/~j~~
William G. Hawkins
Grow Township Attorney
WGH/j j
cc: Marvin Christenson
Richard Schneider
Winslow Holasek
Lawrence B. Carlson