HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC September 15, 1992
;.-..--.- ....,
~)
\"""~":-;;;,:.~,,;o-/ ,/
CITY of ANDOVER
'~
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - SEPTEMBER 15, 1992
Call to Order - 8:01 P.M.
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Discussion Items
1. Amended Special Use Permit/Northern Natural Gas
2. Variance/So Nelson/133l6 Gladiola Street N.W.
3. Timber Meadows Sketch Plan
4. Echo Ridge Sketch Plan
5. Amend Ordinance 8, Section 6.02
Staff, Committees, Commissions
6. Approve Bids/Make-up Air System/Senior Citizen Center
7. DNR Shoreland Grant Application
I~ 8. Temporary Mobile Home Permit/R. Vickstrom
U 9.
10. Property Taxpayers' Trust Fund Resolution
Non-Discussion Items
11. Declare Cost/Order Assessment Roll/Grace Lutheran/92-7
12. Declare Cost/Order Assessment Roll/92-9/176th Lane N.W.
13. Approve Plans & Specs/92-l8/Watt's Garden Acres/Jay st.
14. Award Bid/92-l3/Well #4
15. Accept Petition/Woodland Creek 3rd Addition
16.
17. Approve Cedar Hills Estates 1st & 2nd Streets
18. Designate Xeon st., l49th Ave., & Jivaro st. Minimum
Maintenance Streets
19. Approve Carryover of Park Grant Funds
20. Adopt Proclamation/Local Cable Programming Week
21. Refund Escrow/88-6/Kensington Estates 3rd
Mayor/Council Input
Approval of Claims
Adjournment
,- "
'J
./i~~f5~:':
/'I
~1
\- ,
,-) ';'\""> ,.-"
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE September 15, 1992
AGENDA SECTION
NO. A I f M' t
pprova 0 ~nu es
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO,
Approval of Minutes
Admin.
V. Volk ~.~,
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
August 24, 1992
August 25, 1992
September 1, 1992
Special Meeting
Special Meeting (Smith Absent)
Regular Meeting (Smith absent)
,-- "
G
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
"-' '
~.<~}~".",,>."::.:
~ \ ~,
V ~::"'~"_"'_"'"_ .,
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
September 15, 1992
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
BY: City Planner
ITEM Amend. SUP - N. Natural
NQ Gas Co. - Gas Metering
AGENDA SECTION
NO. D ' , It
~scuss~on ems
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to review the Amended Special Use Permit
request of the Northern Natural Gas Company to allow for the
construction of a 12' x 16' building to house gas metering
equipment at the following described property:
14361 7th Avenue NW (PIN 30-32-24-42-0002).
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the Amended Special Use
Permit process.
'.
Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03, establishes those uses allowed by
special use permit. In a Residential District, public utility
uses or structures are allowed by the granting of a Special Use
Permit.
G
In granting a Special Use Permit, the City Council shall examine
the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and
general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
Planning & Zoning Review
The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their August 25, 1992
meeting, recommended approval of the Amended Special Use Permit
request. Attached for your review are the minutes and the staff
report from the meeting.
continued
COUNCIL ACTION
. '
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
~.;. _/
Page Two
Amended Special Use Permit - Northern Natural Gas Co.
. 1 14361 7th Avenue NW
\..J September 15, 1992
Recommendation
Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend the City
Council approve the Amended Special Use Permit request of the
Northern Natural Gas Company to allow for the construction of a
12' x 16' building to house metering equipment located at 14361
7th Avenue NW (PIN 30-32-24-42-0002).
Attached is a proposed resolution for Council review and adoption.
, '\
'- )
\
"~- )
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
~~
RES. NO. R
-92
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF
THE NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
A 12' X 16' BUILDING TO HOUSE GAS MONITORING EQUIPMENT TO BE
LOCATED AT 14361 7TH AVENUE NW (PIN 30-32-24-42-0002).
WHEREAS, The Northern Natural Gas Company has requested
an Amended Special Use Permit to allow for the construction of a
12' x 16' building to house gas monitoring equipment located at
14361 7th Avenue NW (PIN 30-32-24-42-0002), legally described on
Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed
the request and has determined that said request meets the
criteria of Ordinance 8, Sections 5.03 and 7.03; and
, )
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the
proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no
opposition regarding said request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning and Zoning Commission to allow the Northern Natural Gas
Company to construct a 12' x 16' building to house gas monitoring
equipment on said property with the following conditions:
1. The Special Use Permit will be subject to a sunset
clause as defined in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(0).
2. The proposed building will meet the setback
requirements as established in Ordinance No.8,
Section 6.02.
3. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual
review and site inspection.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
15th day of September, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
'\
, "-J"
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
~J
"
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
A tract of land out of the SE~ of Section 30, T32N-R24W,
described as follows: Beginning at a point 2622.05 feet
West and 869.20 feet South of the E~ corner of said
Section, said point being on the East right-of-way line of
County Aid Road #29; thence East a distance of 125 feet;
thence South a distance of 100 feet; thence West a distance
of 125 feet to a point on the East right-of-way line of
County Aid Road #29; thence North along said East
right-of-way line a distance of 100 feet to the point of
beginning.
\
\.J
, "
'--J
,-J
~
CITY of ANDOVER
REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
AUGUST 25, 1992 - MINUTES
"
"
The Regularly Scheduled Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting was called to order by Chairperson Bonnie Dehn at 7:35
P.M., Tuesday, August 25, 1992 at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., Andover, MN.
Commissioners Present:
Commissioners Absent:
Also Present:
Apel, Jovanovich, McMullen, Dehn
Jonak, Peek, Pease
Dave Carlberg, City Planner; others
Approval of Minutes - August 11, 1992
Commissioner Jovanovich noted that she was present at the
meeting.
MOTION'by McMullen, seconded by Jovanovich to approve the minutes
as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
G)
Public Hearing - Amended Special Use Permit - Northern Natural
Gas - 14361 - 7th Avenue N.W.
"\
o
Mr. Carlberg reviewed the request which is for a 12' x 16'
building in which to house gas metering equipment. An existing
building will be demolished when this building is constructed.
He noted that the new building will have the same exterior as the
existing ones on the property.
At this time Chairperson Dehn opened the public hearing. No one
appeared to give testimony.
MOTION by Apel, seconded by McMullen to close the public hearing.
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by McMullen, seconded by Jovanovich that the Andover
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council
approval of an Amended Special Use Permit requested by Northern
Natural Gas Company to construct a 12' x 16' building to house
monitoring equipment located at 14361 - 7th Avenue N.W. (PIN
30 32 24 42 00002) with the following conditions:
1. The Special Use Permit will be subject to a sunset clause
as defined in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(D).
2. The proposed building will meet the setback requirements
as established in Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02.
3. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual review
and site inspection.
The Commission finds the request meets the criteria established
\ in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, including: the use will not be
~.~ detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of
the community; the use will not cause serious traffic congestion
or hazards; the use will not depreciate the surrounding property
and the use is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. Thp
o
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
August 25, 1992 - Minutes
Page 2
(Amended SUP-Northern Natural Gas, Cont.)
Commis~ion also finds that the use is permitted by special use
under Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03, Residential Districts.
A public hearing was held and there was no opposition.
Motion carried unanimously.
'\
'J
I
~
,- ,~,
~.:
Public Hearing - Variance - 13316 Gladiola Street N.W.
Mr. Carlberg reviewed the request of Steve and Sue Nelson to
allow for the continued placement of a deck and pool encroaching
into the required 75 foot setback from the ordinary high water
mark at 13316 Gladiola Street N.W. He noted that a public
hearing is being held because it is required by Ordinance 71, the
Shoreland Management Ordinance. He presented photos of the
property that were submitted by the applicants.
Mr. Carlberg explained that the pool and deck have been
constructed. The setback should be 75' from the ordinary water
mark because Crooked Lake is a general development lake. The
pool and deck are set back 50 feet from the ordinary high water
mark. Mr. Carlberg noted that a letter has been received from
T~~_~o~;r~~ Hydrologist with the Department of Natural Resources
w~s no objections to the variance being granted.
At this time, Chairperson Dehn opened the public hearing.
.~ Ms. Dehn asked why this wasn't caught in the building department.
~ Mr. Carlberg explained that the Nelsons brought in their plans
\I showing a 75' setback from the ordinary high water mark, which is
~ what i~ has been for the last several years. Someone who was
apparently on the lake noticed that the deck and pool looked like
they were too close to the lake. It should have been caught
earlier but there was some miscommunication.
MOTION by Apel, seconded by McMullen to close the public hearing.
Motion carried unanimously.
Commissioner Apel stated that he looked at the property and it is
not obstusive. Since the applicants have made an effort to
comply with the rules, it would not make sense to deny the
request. He also noted that the first thing you see from the
lake is not the swimming pool; it does not detract from the land-
scape.
.\
'-..-/
Mr. Carlberg noted that the DNR has suggested they plant some
shrubs and trees. Commissioner Apel felt that the planting
should not be a requirement of the city, but something that the
applicant deal with the DNR on.
MOTION by Apel, seconded by McMullen that the Andover Planning
and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of
the variance requested by Steve and Sue Nelson to allow for the
continued placement of a deck and pool encroaching into the
required 75 foot setback from the Ordinary High Water mark on the
CITY OF ANDOVER
o
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
August 25, 1992
AGENDA ITEM
3. Amended SUP
Northern Natural Gas Co.
Gas Metering Building
14361 7th Ave NW
DATE
ORIGINATING DEf1ARTMENT
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
City planner
BY:
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the
Amended Special Use Permit requested by the Northern Natural Gas
Company to allow for the construction of a 12' x 16' building to
house gas metering equipment on the following described property:
14361 7th Ave NW (PIN 30-32-24-42-0002).
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the Amended Special Use
Permit process.
-- ,
,---)
Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03 lists those uses allowed by Special
Use Permit. In Residential Districts~ public utility uses or
structures are allowed under a Special Use Permit.
In granting an Amended Special Use Permit, the following criteria
shall be examined:
1. The Effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals
and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
The use would not have a detrimental effect. The use would
provide a service to area residents.
2. The existing and anticipated traffic conditions, including
parking facilities on adjacent streets and land.
The use would not increase the traffic flow onto 7th Avenue NW or
the surrounding area. The sole purpose of the building is to
house gas metering equipment which will be visited periodically by
employees of the North Central Gas Company.
3. The effect on the values of property and scenic views in the
surrounding area.
The metering equipment building would have no negative impact on
the property values or the scenic views in the area. The building
'; is to be setback nearly 90 feet from the 7th Ave right-of-way and
'-~ nat readily visible.
~)
Page Two
Amended SUP - Metering Equipment Building
14361 7th Ave. NW
Northern Natural Gas Co.
August 25, 1992
4. The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan
The use would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
GENERAL REVIEW
The Northern Natural Gas Company currently has two (2) small
buildings that contain various weather sensitive metering
equipment necessary for the operation of the natural gas
transmission line. In addition, there is an 8' x 10' building
that houses monitoring equipment that will be demolished and
replaced by the 12' x 16' building. Due to increased operational
demands, additional metering equipment is needed, hence the need
for the construction of the new building.
COMMISSION OPTIONS
\
~)
1. The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve the Amended
Special Use Permit requested by the Northern Natural Gas Company
to construct a 12' x 16' building to house monitoring equipment
located at 14361 7th Avenue NW (PIN 30-32-24-42-0002).
The Commission finds the request meets the criteria established in
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, including: .the use will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of
the community; the use will not cause serious traffic congestions
or hazards; the use will not depreciate the surrounding property
and the use is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. The
Commission also finds that the use is permitted by special use
under Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03, Residential Districts.
2. The Planning and Zoning Commission may deny the Amended
Special Use Permit requested by the Northern Natural Gas
Company to construct a 12' x 16' building to house
monitoring equipment located at 14361 7th Avenue NW (PIN 30-32-24-
42-0002).
The Commission finds the request does not meet the criteria
established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03. In denying the
request, the Commission shall state those reasons for doing so.
3. The Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item.
RECOMMENDATION
\
,~~
Staff recommends Option # 1
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
~--.J
RES. NO. R -92
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF
THE NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION ,OF
A 12' X 16' BUILDING TO HOUSE ~AS MONITORING EQUIPMENT TO BE
LOCATED AT 14361 7TH AVENUE NW (PIN 30-32-24-42-0002).
WHEREAS, The Northern Natural Gas Company has requested
an Amended Special Use Permit to allow for the construction of a
12' x 16' building to house gas monitoring equipment located at
14361 7th Avenue NW (PIN 30-32-24-42-0002), legally described on
Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed
the request and has determined that said request meets the
criteria of Ordinance 8, Sections 5.03 and 7.03; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the
proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no
opposition regarding said request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit requested.
-~ ~"\
---...J
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning and zoning Commission to allow the Northern Natural Gas
Company to construct a 12' x 16' building to house gas monitoring
equipment on said property with the following conditions:
1. The Special Use Permit will be subject to a sunset
clause as defined in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(D).
2. The proposed building will meet the setback
requirements as established in Ordinance No.8,
Section 6.02.
3. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual
review and site inspection.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
15th day of September, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
o
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
"AUG-06-1992 08:27 FROM CITY OF ANDOVER
TO
8871740
P.02
-,
. 1
:,j
~',!fS; ~
~ '
, '
,
..
,...~ E c rr.- .....-;-..-
CITY of ANDOVER ,- . "-tv
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. · ANDOVER. MINNESOTA ;~ ~n .1&~}.~755;;61~21'
~nd(1 SPECIAL USE /ERMIT "'~\I f'\:~:::: ~~
;4-3~ I ..:~
property Address .H4t! 7th Ave. N.H.
Legal Description of property:
(Fill in whichever is apporpriate):
::$ 6& A nl~u+E"C:>
Lot
Block
Addition
Plat Parcel PIN
(If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal)
*********************************************************************
Reason for Request
Demolition of existinq 8' x 10' buildinq and construction of new
12' x 16' building. The new building will house updated monitoring equipment.
"
,-.-J
section of Ordinance
current zoni.ng
*********************************************************************
Name of Applicant Northern Natural Gas Company
Address
7901 Xerxes Ave. S.. #209. Minneaoolis. MN 55431
Home Phone ~
signature Jida1ittt{)~ ~../J~
~I'l~ .s 77J,eW\./
*********************************************************************
Business Phone
612-887-1718
Date
Auqust 6, 1992
property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address
~ Al-tA E:.--
"1
'--./
Home Phone
ausiness phone
Signature
Date
****************************************************************..***
~~~\.. - .,un AVE. liI.a.
~ ~~ ~. .n..
~_ r! ~r'2n<J .'1:1 lA. .....
~ '~lfrnd Avt. N...
~ ,~l Ji ~
u "'~: ;
S _,,~./ ,roml"IO"'.'
'''1'h~7
"'1 ".....1...
,; 151. l...."!... ,
Z 1
:; Ii 1 Dfl LA.'!-.. ~ u. N.W.
w ~= Ii 01( &-,<" ~
~ :: z i:; I! .: ,...~ ~
~ "\ ,..... ~ ~ (......,.. ..'. .,.~ i.~;
'~l~ ~a~ ,:~..:; ~t_ ...~...~.., ~':!'o.,,,,
. j"f~, VI ~ ....'i;t.~ ",\~'i1')
~ ~ 71'" yS,J; R' . . ", "".. F~ '1 ....
,: ~ l'. '" A ~:;:o I
In... "'LA. N... ~ ~ . '61
".1 i '~ "" -<o,,~ . i ~ .
a ~"'" u, ...." ~ " if;j II: ':0
~ :;~... u....1 ~ =~.... ~'$::Y ~;
w !:;; :! i .... .........,= L
-! ..c~"'"
!Ii f: N.W. :;~I ~ ;
":t'~ .~..~ ij H:"1~ i fl.J< ~;
.}-f 5 ~".' l'laft.... 't-... ~~.
~ 150""'... t~U.. ~__
\' ' ..... ,.... :,~ 1
\.~ ~ ~ ~...",.... )~
"'-oC. I'""" "Wl.~".' ::;.,......"" ...,... :. N.W.
.........". .,. ......u..,. Jl~
. - I.,~ :.t . . -. !t::i .. ~
14''th LA.N... \'.......:.. .1) . ,,,''''' avE. '41ttl Z 8
. r,~ $ t.... N... ....
. . ' r"'4W; ,_ u,... .:
M'I : ~ 10'" ..: AVI:. ~
~ 'of' ~ AI" l.... "" .
~ ~ <0,,',-_ ~r~L .'F.? u..,.. '!.
"'-" a...... '; I I :a L!f. ~C!!! u..... ....... . , :0'
~1L1_.>L.... \ :.!: . '4:::~ I~:~ ~,~~~k~ ~~ ~~Jrli-
~~". 'l ~ - ;~~I! t",." .~~ .... 4
i .~ ~' \ '~". ~ ~il~~ =...t...
- '. ~ u'': ".... ..-#- .,xy ~I~
,.t~ ~ AI-- . ~ F' "' '4'.' l~~N...
.;.:;-;;. ~ '<, ,.... " 9~ ,< <D is
t ;'! !!~ .'1~'... ~ VAn 0 ka' ",." r" I "on. u.
i;;j"..i..~. !::.:.:' ~ :...:.~ '1.; -,;/ M " . b.~ f",,; S':!l '_'>L U. ~
~.. :; - · ;:l J <D i' ~ ~ ~\ ~ ~ I- i1u...~ n. ."1 ~~ . t.A...~
.. .,.. ^ , l \... ~ ~I; ,,",, t.A. 2 ...._ ~ .... .~~
~ c &.r.~ _ 1'""-.. .~.
. ~i,,; :; :~.\,.. ~ ~~~ri.i~i,:~:"" ..
~ 26 9,~ {~:; ~ \\< I q _ c~.42 ~. .\~tf --. r',~" . _.
#. '\; '. ,~J,~~. ::: ~\~="'AC'"", "S.."t ," ....u.:;;.~'~~.~yly'
!,t ~ Ii ~ r. lIcC&~~': ~r..~ I.i:;'" L'.:< ....scr~".:...:::'!... ~ I .~~(.'\~t:
~ ~... ~ ....IN'.. 51 U .t<=. U ,,~.: 't~~ "'~"....;
'.. ~ ",;,.11 r,;t~t;:;JS~. u 1~~ '";;J ~ ~;;n~;". .!~!l~:~ f~ I
~::.",,~ J'4~~JIO ~'+ j 5 :; l r"l7 '<:!' ~ ).Ji"\!1!~ ty, . "!:"J' ~ ,..,,,, .....
J! '-=' I I r7.'I ;> ....,,...;7.i- '! ~ '#" ''''~ .... ' ;
'~"''' ~ ~ l2.J ~ . If' ~ _ '~l~'\"',9 '
,--l~~r .) ! T f1
19,.., I!.., I .~:_.nD SY',. ~c.. nD ~.... ll:,r,;v .:: il~ ~ ,~,,::"::":"""::.'~: .1~!..,,'~~;;;17'-:;':~h:'.'-;...:.~~
.... . 1-> f'" wl:::J '~.C' .~~..,_ "'_"_"_'~"
it;>. J i~A"'" s ~ ~ ~ ..." DR. ~ . ~ ST, ~.::'... .:. ~ .... . :?:::;,":~'=~0~;;;~:2;.: .
1 ~ .w,,:....~ I~.\ .:tP...~N:: "~~l}i; ~ ~l~$~"~t~a~~.
~~~
.c T)rel AvE I~f
'!,- -;;:.. ~
\ ,,_ ,u. :1 (
",.. ~~~ l
~ I .. .... r
,-------':-. "" ".'" l.A. II. w. i't .... . ~
~r f~. :; .... ~ "':~Av[~
. jl ~ w ...
~ 23 ~ t.:.~.~"
~ ~ ~
: ~ :. .!.!!!:.\ct~
u ~ oi I, '''.'1:''..
a ~I L7.T1 .... r
~ '.411'1.. .
EIIt.4...:I Ac.. ...
.~ i I>L
h
! ":.
....: '~
.
~
/-.....J....
.
z
J~o \\.
~:;~
I nrel AV(. :
. ....~
~
~
+4.
4~o
...~
i
4
o
~
~
..
~LA."~..
(1
"
1
'\~
~
~
~
In",
AVE.
.'
~
,
'!
'U ~
j'!il ~
~ I ,;;; LA. N. W.
"
.
CD
*'~
...... M...
J ~
5
!
J
=
5
_~r-
1i2nd LA. ....... :;
z
,;
.: ...
i liMn U.
.I t~{~~,t.~ ?
';. ~ -;. . ;:"Vol" ~
IS' '" "'lA. :..a,....
~
.Q' 15'''' ~..~ .....
ll\!.!.JJ... "'Wl. ....
,'~ll'"
.
..... .>L
o
~ ~
.'
~
'-
0' \
>. I
e '--nAMSEY
MUNICIPAL
OFFICES
I
s_
LeIw
i~f~'
... "Js ...
,;~ .j,I
:\1'1 ",to
.~
~~
~
~
., INOUSnlT
i"
CY.
o ,;
~ z
~ ,:
~l : .!!!.fftA"'"
;; 4
..,.-: . 154''', LA
~. --w'- ~
.' $_ Z
,5,rel " ..\~ :; ...\'t.
IS3rd I: ~
~3
~
f
!
N...
~
p,
~:It ~
.,
...
~
~
~
~ ~
~
Z
> !:
5
N... ~I~
:'lll..I't"~i ..... ..... J
~I u.<< N...
i;-
l12nd A
-
ITO""
I
. .
",'" ~
.....
~
e
,,-
I
J
(
- li4ttl LA. N
I'';'''. nt.
! i~3r.
,,2nd lA."
..
~
.. AYE.
..,..
~ ..
:& ",., -i
..... (;
~F'O'"
1:: LA.".-
- <!>
~ \\
IStt" AVE~N..~
..
..
@ I
A
:r
~J ISfnd
I-,Ji
,..,..~JJ
(j)
c
~<f
f1
0\
')
_/
"-
f'C\
I ','
':/.. '
~
N 0
I I:)
r... '\:l
;'V
'\:l
"'"
./
,)
. .-'~~
31
1":.....
,)
,
I,
: \
~~ -'
,... ;
f,t:I: .
I-l" ·
~~ ;'
~(5 1'.
q: l-"
'0 T.
0_
:<(
o
.t /u
,I ONI ~
" , (.I) ~
~.~ ~
~ Yo.. 6)
. ~ ~~
.: ~ Jot z !~
i~ll
q:
.
o
o
I
,
30 - J 2-1 '1- <I 'Z-
(acc/) -
//)
({J}OO)
L/o"""'~'" C"",..,...1'1'rV&1'lQ,? Co.
.s: zz.4c.
:
r- .,JSp1)
.
: "
! . .
l. ,JZlr-i......
t
.
30 - ~ '2. - 2.4 - 1./ ~
&oa / )
)l
1(,) .
~.~
~ffi
:.. :>-
Ie{
i
.
,
, .
~'~l : 'ANOKA
Ji1f..l: ,~: ~:.
K"'f4'd~
(..I)
1 ;, (''iu) .
! . ~ GI....1f ~ .).)11(. So...t..Cy
i . .l".4~
o
.'
l
It)
COUNTY
..0_ II. T.L, ..... ;"7..
.HIGHWA'Y
COUNTY
'AI'II'J"Ll'~ . '. /"".3"".....
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
, y'
...-.....
,
I
/.111
I
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(3.f)
--
7T
/
rr
~ I '
~Ll
III
I
II I
1/ ~
II I
~ I
,
"
., ..' ~ f
" ....
',' ~
-:_'
X-
I
RIGHT. OF...
.;
~:
ROAD NO. 116
I
-~..
~
i
I
I
'---I
I I
I 1_- --,
J ,.,,-, '
.r- ,
~'
~ : 1
'ft't", .
,l,
, '\~,'
OF CITY
tJ
'I
,,_~I
"\
"- ~)
'.
,-j
z
o
~
<
;;
g
,
,
a
~
g
~
~
"
f
ci
t
~
\? n ~
0 ~ '" i3
0 <5
~ ? "
~ ~
~ ;
~ ~
..~
~s
~ ~
~
] I. ~I; ~!~
'''&~~~~ N
n
o
.~
;;
.. 8
- ~
J:
~ /I 5 '1J
Z ^;:o
~ ~I J : E
h ~ ~
Cl~ ....
~..)ar-
-. z c a
< - n
~ 3::Q ~ ~
z '" l~ Ci
ZI< ~ z
Cl
z'
l
.
~
~ . 2 tIj
~ ~ Z >-
. ~ =u
~ ""
" - ,..,
., ~
~ Z
-
I ~ "
~ fl!
"
II
rill
110
:<:'1
"
"
II
"Ji'::
11
~ -~-g IP=I p:l
,--------
~~
Si:'
"
~
. :
" .
.
j
. ~
".
. ~
. .
~ V'l'!:
, ..
!I~~
."',
i ~
'"
'" '"
~ '"
~
'"
~ '"
~ "
<;; ~
;:J ..,
.., c:
::: s:
?;
11 t-
~ "
" '-
~ OJ
"
~ ~
::l ~
"
'<
'" '"
""<
I
I
~I
"I
~I
~I
Zl
I'll
I
=-@ ~--
','
lOa' PROPER TY LINE
----------------\
--:~!.!~l"~S~
----, I
r~--~
X I
l
1\
i
II
X
l
1\
i
i
~
!
I~
I
I
I
I-
N
IUI
I
I .
I
I~
I~
I....
12
I~
I
I"
"\
)
'-~'
\
"-~
'\
,-_.J
((j."\
~.L, :'\;'
~ ./
.. ~lo....::$i;"
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
"
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the city of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, August 25, 1992 at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the Amended Special
Use Permit request of the Northern Natural Gas Company to
construct a 12 ft x 16 ft building to house gas metering equipment
located at 14361 7th Avenue NW.
(Generally located east of 7th Avenue and North of Bunker Lake
Boulevard).
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
A copy of the application and location will be available at
Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
.( '-.+-' J;//
(~:.A...,!/~ [JIJ-C.L/
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
Publication dates: August 14, 1992
August 21, 1992
o
F '\
o
~
PIN
30-32-24-42-0001
30-32-24-42-0022
30-32-24-42-0023
30-32-24-43-0001
30-32-24-31-0001
PROPERTY OWNERS
','
NAME & ADDRESS
Iowa Public Service Co
%Public Service Co.
1080 Montreal Ave
St. Paul Mn 55102
John T. Frazer
P. O. Box 293
Anoka, Mn 55304
Maryls A. Muehlbauer
4360 144th Ln NW
Anoka, Mn 55034
Rosella D. Sonsteby
4151 141St Ave NW
Anoka, Mn 55304
City of Anoka
~~"~.""A
r ,;f~P"" ~":. ~.
\..
'0~ '"
',I".",
.~'l'" . ;
,.~~,-~. -,
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning '~
David L. Carlberg
BY: City Planner
September 15, 1992
ITEM Variance - Setback from
NO. OHW Mark - 13316 Glad-
,;? iol;o ~t- 1\TW 1\T..l......
APPR~OED R
AGE~ A
lj.
Bf
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to review the variance request
of Steve and Susan Nelson to allow for the continued placement of
a deck and a swimming pool encroaching into the required seventy-
five (75') foot setback from the Ordinary High Water (OHW) mark on
the property located at 13316 Gladiola Street NW, legally
described as Lot 6, Block 2, Lundgren Oakridge Addition (PIN 33-
32-24-34-0030). Please consult the attached report presented at
the August 25, 1992 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting for
further background information.
/ '
Planning Commission Review & Recommendation
'--'
The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their August 25, 1992
meeting, recommended approval of the variance request by Steve
and Susan Nelson.
Attached please find a proposed Resolution for your review and
approval, the minutes from the August 25, 1992 meeting and the
report presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
COUNCIL ACTION
, "
'-J
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
~~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -92
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE VARIANCE REQUEST OF STEVE AND SUSAN
NELSON TO ALLOW FOR THE CONTINUED PLACEMENT OF A DECK AND
SWIMMING POOL ENCROACHING TWENTY-FIVE (25') INTO THE REQUIRED
SEVENTY-FIVE (75') FOOT SETBACK FROM THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER'
(OHW) MARK ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13316 GLADIOLA STREET NW,
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 6, BLOCK 2, LUNDGREN OAKRIDGE ADDITION
(PIN 33-32-24-34-0030).
WHEREAS, Steve and Susan Nelson have requested a variance
to allow for the continued placement of a deck and swimming pool
encroaching twenty-five (25') feet into the required seventy-five
(75') foot setback from the Ordinary High Water (OHW) mark on the
property located at 13316 Gladiola Street NW, legally described as
Lot 6, Block 2, Lundgren Oakridge Estates; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has reviewed the
request and has determined that said request meets the conditions
established in Ordinance No. 71, Section VIII and that a hardship
does exist; and
~
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the variance for the following
reasons:
1. The individuals tried very hard to comply with the
various regulations and the violation of the Shoreland
Zoning Ordinance was in error.
2. The deck and pool fit in nicely with the surrounding
area.
3. The DNR feels that approval would be proper.
4. A public hearing was held and there was no opposition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission and hereby approves the variance
request of Steve and Susan Nelson to allow for the continued
placement of a deck and swimming pool encroaching twenty-five
(25') feet into the required seventy-five (75') foot setback from
the Ordinary High Water (OHW) mark on the property located at
13316 Gladiola Street NW, legally described as Lot 6, Block 2,
Lundgren Oakridge Estates.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
15th day of September, 1992.
'\
CITY OF ANDOVER
j
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victor~a Volk, Citv Clerk
\
. )
'--/
@
,.~)
Planning & zoning Commission Meeting
August 25, 1992 - Minutes
Page 2
(Amended SUP-Northern Natural Gas, Cant,)
Commis~ion also finds that the use is permitted by special use
under Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03, Residential Districts.
A public hearing was held and there was no opposition.
Motion carried unanimously.
Public Hearing - Variance - 13316 Gladiola Street N.W.
Mr. Carlberg reviewed the request of Steve and Sue Nelson to
allow for the continued placement of a deck and pool encroaching
into the required 75 foot setback from the ordinary high water
mark at 13316 Gladiola Street N.W. He noted that a public
hearing is being held because it is required by Ordinance 71, the
Shoreland Management Ordinance. He presented photos of the
property that were submitted by the applicants.
Mr. Carlberg explained that the pool and deck have been
constructed. The setback should be 75' from the ordinary water
mark because Crooked Lake is a general development lake. The
pool and deck are set back 50 feet from the ordinary high water
mark. Mr. Carlberg noted that a letter has been received from
Tom Hovey, Hydrologist with the Department of Natural Resources
which off s no objections to the variance being granted.
I
\;'
~)' At this time, Chairperson Dehn opened the public hearing.
~ Ms. Dehn asked why this wasn't caught in the building department.
~ Mr. Carlberg explained that the Nelsons brought in their plans
\I showin9 a 75' setback from the ordinary high water mark, which is
~ what i~ has been for the last several years. Someone who was
apparently on the lake noticed that the deck and pool looked like
they were too close to the lake. It should have been caught
earlier but there was some miscommunication.
'\
)
MOTION by Apel, seconded by McMullen to close the public hearing.
Motion carried unanimously.
Commissioner Apel stated that he looked at the property and it is
not obstusive. Since the applicants have made an effort to
comply with the rules, it would not make sense to deny the
request. He also noted that the first thing you see from the
lake is not the swimming pool; it does not detract from the land-
scape.
Mr. Carlberg noted that the DNR has suggested they plant some
shrubs and trees. Commissioner Apel felt that the planting
should not be a requirement of the city, but something that the
applicant deal with the DNR on.
MOTION by Apel, seconded by McMullen that the Andover Planning
and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of
'the variance requested by Steve and Sue Nelson to allow for the
continued placement of a deck and pool encroaching into the
required 75 foot setback from the Ordinary High Water mark on the
o
Regular Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
August 25, 1992 - Minutes
Page 3
(Variance - 13316 Gladiola St., Cont.)
property located at 13316 Gladiola Street, legally described as
Lot 6, Block 1, Lundgren Oak ridge Addi tion for the followimj\'
reasons: 1) the individuals tried very hard to comply with the
various regulations and violation of the Shoreland Zoning
Ordinance was in error; 2) the deck and pool fit in nicely with
the surrounding area; 3) the DNR feels that approval would be
proper; 4) a public hearing was held. There was no opposition.
Motion carried unanimously.
Public Hearing - Amendment to Ordinance 8, Section 6.02
Mr. Carlberg explained that the amendment would require a 15'
sideyard setback from the interior lot line when the plans for
the principal structure accommodate an access for a deck.
.~
Commissioner McMullen stated that he would like to see no decks
allowed on the sideyard. He spoke to several builders and they
said that the sliding glass doors that are put on some houses
could easily be removed and moved to the back of the house.
At this time, Chairperson Dehn opened the public hearing. No one
appeared to give testimony.
MOTION by McMullen, seconded by Jovanovich to close the public
hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Apel, seconded by McMullen that the Andover Planning
and zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of
an amendment to Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 to add an additional
five (5) feet onto the sideyard setback when the principal
structure accommodates access for a deck.
Motion carried unanimously.
Discussion - Ordinance No.8, Section 4.21- Fencing
MOTION by McMullen, seconded by Apel to table this item to the
next meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
Other Business
~J
Mr. Carlberg stated that he is trying to schedule a meeting with
the auto recycling yard owners for September 8, 1992.
MOTION by McMullen, seconded by Apel to adjourn. Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 8:10 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
(- .J' I(fd
IL-~ &',;.-?-<---
Vicki Volk
Acting Recording Secretary
~~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
AGENDA ITEM
4. P.H. - Variance
Setback from OHW Mark
13316 Gladiola St NW
Steve & Sue Nelson
DA~qust 25, 1992
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
BY:
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY~
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review the
request of Steve and Sue Nelson to allow for the continued
placement of a deck and pool encroaching into the required 75 foot
setback from the ordinary high water (OHW) mark on the property
located at 13316 Gladiola Street. NW, legally described as Lot 6,
Block 2, Lundgren Oakridge Addition (Pin 33-32-24-34-0030).
The deck and. pool have been constructed and encroach twenty-five
(25') feet in the required setback from the ordinary high water
(OHW) mark.
The property is zoned R-4, Single Family Urban.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
o
Ordinance No. 71, the Shoreland Ordinance, Section II, designates
Crooked Lake as a General Development lake.
Section III(A), requires a 75 foot setback from the OHW mark.
Section VIII, Variances, states that "variances shall only be
granted when there are particular hardships which make strict
enforcement of official control impractical. They shall not
circumvent the general purpose and intent of the official
controls. No variance may be granted that would allow any use
that is prohibited in the zoning district in which the subject
property is located. Conditions may be imposed in the granting of
the variance to insure compliance and to protect adjacent
properties and the public interest.
Section IX, requires notification of the public hearing be sent
ten (10) days prior to such hearing to the Commissioner of
Resources (DNR) and that final decisions on variances will be sent
to the Commissioner no later than ten (10) days following final
action.
CASE BACKGROUND
Attached for commission review is a letter from the property
owners indicating the situation that has brought the variance
request before the Commission this evening.
o
Page Two
Variance - Setback OWH mark
13316 Gladiola Street NW
Steve Nelson
o
COMMISSION OPTIONS
"
A. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend
approval of the variance requested by steve and Sue Nelson to
allow for the continued placement of a deck and pool
encroaching into the required 75 foot setback from the
Ordinary High Water (OHW) mark on the property located at
13316 Gladiola street NW, legally described as Lot 6, Block 2,
Lundgren Oakridge Addition (Pin 33-32-24-34-0030).
The Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the
provisions of Ordinance No. 71, Section VIII.
B.
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend
denial of the variance requested by Steve and Sue Nelson to
allow for the continued placement of a deck and pool
encroaching into the required 75 foot setback from the
Ordinary High Water (OHW) mark on the property located at
13316 Gladiola Street NW, legally described as Lot 6, Block 2,
Lundgren Oakridge Addition (Pin 33-32-24-34-0030).
o
The Commission finds that the proposal does not meet the
requirements set forth in Ordinance No. 71, Section
VIII. The Commission finds that no particular hardships
exists which would make the strict enforcement of official
control impractical.
C.
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may table the item,
:,J
o
~-.J
,-_J
... _... . ".. _. .... .. ... . _,_, ..... ... ... _ . .0. _.~. _"'._.. _ _ _ _. _. n . . . ... .. .. __ hO' _ .. _ .. __. _" . . . __ _..._.. . .... . ._ _. . '_0_'_
fA
CITY of ANDOVER
VARIANCE REQUEST FORM
"
property Address I ~311o (.-tnAI(\\n ~. t-.L W '
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is appropriate):
Block 7 Addition \ ll'r\r\n(en
J
Parcel PIN _R 33 32 2~
and bounds, attach the complete legal)
t')(\ \s. ri c\3~-
34 O('),~()
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of Request ,^\e: oxe rp~\e::s+;n~ n \'(\finn('{:~ ~f the l~'
Se-\ tnr\<. .\A( S-mu-A,tfPS o-the:"( +hon \J0G..\ \"'\CU"-PS Cill
C\('(')\:.ec\. \ (\ k.eJ . ,C)f'f' n~ nr'nec\ \p-\\-er
'Ale f\ee. c\ n 2E)1 el\r'({')~.l('\-,\'f\l""'l\,+.
Specific Hardship ~e \v-.ne ttlo.ten inlJested i", .-\--hle::, {J'f<(j-ec-t. Wi+hcu..+
'-\\-'\5 \!fh,nnre. ~t<; m0rle'-l {o..\i.\\ 'of. k<;+ onA QAc-\~ \-1.c'I"Ia.1 ("r){)1~
\ I
I,~i ~\ ~ I\t'C..p~sa ~ .-\-c-. -( PfY'1()\J-e '~f" S,-tn I "'-\-u rf'. (1tnA (~\it 11 J. ~-e. tI
Section of Ordinance ~ 1/ Current Zoning ~- 4- al'd,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Applicant s.\-P\';t>, -\- SU~(\ ~e~~
Address \33 \\,.. 0-\r(d10\() 5\-. "-IW
~2.2.-S;"8 37
H~me phone ~ =1'1: Bu,ine" Phone 4-3"=.'lf{J(J
S~gnature ~-------4f::. <-fZ.Lb~ Date /iu7' If): ,Oq'L
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address
Home Phone
Business Phone
Signature
Date
---------------------------------------------------------------------
~
o
:_J
VARIANCE
PAGE 2
The following information shall be submitted prior to review by the
city of Andover:
~
1: A scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks;
adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures
within 100 feet.
2. Application Fee: Single Family $~'
Other Requests - $~
Date Paid
Receipt #
Rev. 1-07-92:d'A
Res. 179-91 (11-05-91)
CRITERIA FOR GRANTING A VARIANCE
In gr.anting a variance, the City Council shall consider the advice anc
recommendation of the Planning and zoning Commission, and:
1. If the request is in keeping with the spirit and intent of
this Ordinance.
2. If it finds that strict enforcement of this Ordinance will
cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
individual property under consideration.
3. If it finds that denying the request does not deny reasonable
use of the property.
4. Economic considerations shall not constitute an undue hardshi~
if reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of
the Ordinance.
" ')
--~"
__S.~~e~
\03\b b\Qcho~ ,g, ~12'
~-eY'J ~M ~ S5"tfJ~
. n___________fC..F.~~o.\\a.S\CA..-e.~ U.e~~
I '()___.p\o:O[\ \{)5-QLr __rro1_~\~ee.\-_we_ddc{roj__[\e_cL___ -
~b.e_0(d~no.c~ _t\jCj~~.\ec_LO_tL\ALL_fY\OLk__o.c.Q._or.o.\n5 -
_-\Dfue_de~ cil\OJ"L_s-toAecl_\ r\..-~d6\,ec5_0Lc1' Da.nce ~ lj.-
\\
Lb.e_ocd\rull.P1~b_\...W_a.'k..r ma.c'6.. l S c.oJnroc~
. \ t~~_~\(\'~L---wJlerF. *-be_C\o..-1u(Cl..\ _\J_~do..-n~C:...ho.D-Z)es
,-.J ~()lY\ ~Lea6J:ri\p.~I\..ll~_~~a:h_c. -\n_r..Le~lL\ffio.'f'.i"\~
_-Ler(es~(ic..\, ./
1\1 '\5_~c;\.Q.t_Wo..5_a.\s~_Le1'e1.erecd_-\n_u.s
I n \C\~~_Q't3he_\)....tl~ben--\.pe QP~\.\ed_-\nL-a..'Dd
_lPe~:e_~\o.nk~_Ct.-fe.tm.L.\'---_~_wC>.C\::'---_:LO-_pf Cxkclcd__~_G..-k,(5.
llDIY\ ~',s \ T\ ~'(lY\.CL-\ic.'0.--~e de.kIn":lllL<=-d_~___h.-e.'(-e_v.-':e
~Ll':)'ri.\ _OLl '( l '6' 0d_'cac.k_~~s)_o. ce.w_\J,.{>_C>UL-p'lCt.Il5.i_
n.n.d. __d{O~~e_d_-.:...i:hem __nett'. _Q:\ ___~e_______l l"\Sre~-ks_o:t~ce, ----
OY\--~'l \ 3 ~q 2_~e\Y~L\-~\a.nO-uXt6-e'1I)eD-pWlcil'05-
_pfLffi"L-r ~ <gS.3~Q_p{oc.:e_e_c\~d._LC"L\--1 +~e \ a:sto..~Q..~GY\-
oW\J.X'-?-~ \. ~D -L'0..5~-h..O<"'\ Ltd.Q._&_cl6'a.e_O'f\ +h", s
'. J ~un:d"__,
T lAD-Qn.d_~~\.p:ce k~---1a:...~aLL-..J.v..\~_z.9..~ qf",_I_
_C\...-5_ec.oQc\_'ouLLdm~_~_cm'~.::1:r-o.u.mbe'C--g_to~3_la~}---L0-o.s
\
. ,
'---/
___.____..._____.________ ____________ ___u.._._.___..__.
___ ~-,2-:__. -- -
__ ~e\SOn_____ - ~
~ .'ili.flU.nce__R€<{Llt'
\,
\
_._----.--- ------ ------------------- - -----
. "
I
,-j
_.-ry~o.nk._d~_\o_Ua.\:e.-B.Q~~-b(- .ili~ c.Q(\s-tru.d:i.m_ot'_~
_CU<_ _deG:\~_511i10WfH:1Lt:~_~~~-9-00 \. I-\- \..0Q ':>
_a.Le0_0I .+b_~_L,-\u.\\~ 2Q, \9.9.2.) -t~~ \hSp.ec:t\on
_W-Cl~ rY\D.cL-e QfI~ <) \< \ d ~y :t\--'~ b-\:-\ ~c; C')~ ~
.fuf>: de.d:.-."--c..cn.s-\-rtl('A-\(~ oe<jo.n 011 \J\\edJ ""\-z.C\-ct2.____
0.."(\ a cC'"x\~ {"\I.l:e d +'ne. ?i:/")?:> \ sf- J 0:1'\ A Pn 1~ 3 nl ,
We \f.\f>(e Il\'\-4i~ 0.\1 ~lHX 0+ c..amp)C-1-\cYl
\.u"e-f\ O'r\ ~31 \ctct2 (.De l~(-e -\c\d +6+ {here
~s a cr.1-eS-hnA. o-t i u\le(f" i~e. c\e-t-efM\Y'\~d
-\-he D\-\ \\1 mo.'fK -\-0 be. o.T\c\ +kt Ol~~c-L-
Loa s ", (\ v \ 0 \(\ -\-\ ('~ ()+ -the "1 ':)\ ;<=e-\-roL~ y ettu \ f"emt'
5io.c.-..e.. -\-h:l:\- '-t\ me VJ e ""0 I.::e. '\"\0-..6 Tom
,
~\le~ I 0. DN. ~ \j~c>\oCJ'\~-t J OIJ-\ 1D +\'e. ~J'e- o:n.L
c {';(\SL1.tk-~ lDi-\-h "" \ ~ an ~.e. \uCt1.t;.('"X; d" ..;.h~
_O~ rvvi('\:', f'\r")c\\V'\~ ~-e e}(D('~ mo..f~ 15
_di ~,~~ r (I \ -\- ()'f\ C'::\..>- \" S'rJO\e..\ \ f\-r 'oecnu.se\-"<= LDo...4et-
,",,0<; ~\uXL\D.:hA c-\\O.ffi~{"C\.\\~ - 0--\ -h\fY\r>$ h-e\n3
(")u..\. a\MD~-\- \(~f')1 +r-~m lu\\ere. '1-t \5 \\()W..
L.~ ~f'I c., ~ Q.Cf\0_\'--l~ed ~ -\- ~e 0. 'f e -11"1
eCf(Yc- o~ +~e 0 \-\ W roa.r \.i \C"j"(Y-t1D\ and 4-e\e~(e.
\'{\us+ ~~ ~(' ~\c:., \jG.nCLY\ct:
~)
. .
,-J
, \cl e._ __ha\)c__~'ul\r''~Jj_a.n.d__1011oJ.'le~ __-:\br~t
\ r'\ qpod ia:.\\- h ::b_.fu.~'Des...~Lo-LL'( Q'o' \' e$_
~J _O~ +h\ s_~rJ~1_e_d~.!_-~-------1Y\-\s-xo.~-e._c>x_e~L(o.'( ill
~u--d~e.ffiea.L-LU_(lS_to.O.._de D.LL~\..UC1,s_D63: c,Q,.Ue\d:
\ l~ -\-:he_p[~e_c.A lUOs_ceoJ (' Ci01.P.:e_t\_d\ .
~e__p.o\.;(._Z._{>-e-Lm.-L-ts_C\.hd._\_OX) ::5:~
_\-p-~_e~~_o.D~__J-.n.e_e.L'(D.r WCl.S__DD-t___dLsc.o~e (cd,
We._D--e.ed +h~_\La...ciQD-'---e. b_com..pl~_af\ ci
sa....-hsf.y o.\L-{)UL-\ics----it0LolD--eJ~,
~
o
,
\.
\..J
~
"--,-
r-r,~3029'
:t:. /
!!/
1.
It)
...
N
X
l-
e
o
z
2
o
8
o
236.43'
-.
I
8 -.
,
r
.... !'
'"I ,~.
J.
I
..
3'
4
~~ ' /
- ~I ,,/
- .
./
./
./
'"
"
'"
w
~
."~-' .::t~~.,-~.. .:,"
-1 .
~
. N
'7
c
./
"'~/
"'/
// 2 C
,.
,
I I
o
Ig
I I
I
/'
8
14152'
7
I I"ID
18
- 0
~2
I
11-
II
I~
o
IT
II
....
_..,-~=~~~..-- -r---' ~
141.52
Q
W
~
o
o
a::
u
193045'
f\
~-
,!~~ }'
~ ; -- ......
;-J.<Mear.der -, " .
-!,- ....C.... ---~ .
. -. -.. - "J-
': or. nO.7 - /
6
150.46'
5
I
I I
18
,..:
12,
: I
! I
, 177.'2'
133F
66'
..
.
.:: : : :_j :.: .....: :. t.: :.,
,. ..- t . : ': :. :..:'.: -, :.:
,
." ,':::: :. 6:. .-""
:. :.. :.,. ..:
, . 1
State of M1:1nelota )
\
66'
t-:
en
<(
a:
~
N.C. HOIUM AND ASSOCIA YES, INC.
Po 0, BOX aa026-COON RAPIDS. MINN. ~04aa
10731 HISS. BLVD. N.W., COON RAPIDS, HN
LAND SURVEYORS
T .I.phon.
42~-7a22
:~
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY:
STEVE NELSON
~""' ----:1)..---
^'
~o
,
, ,-
"
J'
P.I
"-
~
..
I
Q
I'
'\J
~
-
I
:J
'.'
GLADIOL A
57:
- 51,99
-i--
.J
~I
I
~I
~I
"I
--
'.
,/777777777777/"
. 45,("
~ ",-0 1-5"F 5.....,.
.\( !-la, 1:1311..
"Ii ('5,'-
, ,.....h:////////........:.:... ..
II).'
,
.
('
lj
1</
0\
nl
-
~ '.
_%1- 0 I{
._1
I
...1N(I,fjgf~~
~J~~
'75"'
~~~~
,
,
t!~~71
II ~ lc~eJ
-,-
,4--:.'_.. _..
LAKE
Lot 6. Block'2.
LUNDGREN OAKRIDG~ ADDITION,
fW~~
i/ ~~
Anoka County, Minnesota
-
I HUElY CERTIfY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPReSENTATION DP A SURVEY DP THE IDUNDU'U
O' TNI AlOVI OUCRlalD LANO. AHO THI LOCATION O' ALL IUILOINGS, THUEOH, AHD ALL VISIILI EH.
CROACHIIEIITS. I' AIIT, fROIl OR Oil SAIOLAHD.
(J
AS SURVEYED IT liE THIS....iU...li!;......DAT d. ...........Q.<;;I;!;1.tlll.f..................A,D, .9....,11.7......
II.C, HOIUII AND AUJ.5IATEJ.JHC. ,
/}1, C". ~
;;~:~.;:.:~.it~.;;:.;;;;;:.::.~;:{~..?J:::::::::.:.:::::................. ...................
.~
~)
,. '\
'----"
(,/(Ji.' \,
\1'\ /
-~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
,-
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, August 25, 1992 at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the variance
request of Steve Nelson to allow for the placement of a deck
and swimming pool encroaching into the required seventy-
five (75') foot setback from the ordinary high water mark on the
property located at 13316 Gladiola Street NW.
(Generally located on the east shore of Crooked Lake).
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
A copy of the application and location will be available at
Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
[~/~
Victor~a Volk, City Clerk
publication dates: August 14, 1992
August 21, 1992
:a .... Vl ;:c
:> ..., n v.
_--l=I.~
c;,,) ...A~
(II ..... ::tIl"",
-< :>N
'-
C;QN
ZO';-
.....Z
~.., :> v.
, r :-
'-_..a C7
a
:ara
o .....
ll"-.J
Z
>co
rn
,....
-
~
(,1
m
...,
....
I..
'-
r'
.'
:.--..=:::tJ
=- \,... ;;.. l",...
t..; \".."Ir..
Q \",,1;A
< \"ili: I"..~
r.' -< r..,;
;0
c.;.~
r rr. I'.
:> < ..-
0>
.....:.: """..
.&-
c
r'-
>
C
".c
(,,;. \oJ i
...;:.;;~
'\ rn
-r
'--~:>
..
~
m
...,
'-I
I..
::u
~
."
>-"==
~ \...::> 1,....
c """..n l",...
o IwlA
< ,-"m \",..
m -<N
:::l
l;)
r m r.J
:><:...
o:=>
0-0::1..-0
o ...
r'-
:=>
C
"'.... 0
...,
'"
""'3
m
zr
~:=>
:i: .:;;:
;;:
m
: ) N
~.
~
...
>"'0;;;0
::: '-"i r- \,.,"
01.... :t> ""'"
AC",
>...rn....
;0 N
~
r r r..
>m.&-
oe
o-zl..-o
O>.&-
r;o
>oC
a
Z:I:\,,<
~ Q\
II'-
\.0
:;;
~ :t;
....
,-,
....
l...
.-..
:> o~
;.: l.. ...... \,..,
....:,;, lw..r I..
A...r
:>--lCl..j
z r...i
Co,
r- -,. r-..:
:> > ."
C'C
~ r \"..
Ci ...
rn
> c
....c
:;;: l.....
:,,:H ....J
:a
rn
=
:: m
....
...,
....
'-
.'
:;::'...10;:
;..:.'-"
Cl.-
AN
:>--l
~
r
:>
o
0-
o
r
:>
;z
:L
c:a
~.......
m\"'i
I..
mN
c::
w. r"...J
m.;...
;;::
mI...
...
o
C
..~ 0
1,..1
C'c..>
o
:;;
Z
:::>
A
VI
...,
'"
a
...
>.....'-:0
Z\.;-.IC..,..
Ol.-Z\,,<
~ N (.~
:> 1..-0:0:1..
o-N
m:a
~-tN
0:1:...
m
r....,,,,,,
a::::...
mo
....3C
"':>u
","'I.H
"'"
Z'"
C
",
-
-
n
,"1
...,
I..
l...
..-
'-
::t;.r. ... ::c _
~....C;....
c '-. "" \,..
A ....-t
:;,. c...>....
I;;:; rw
rn
...... ("""; t...
0;,.;0:--
m::>
rrJ....
:o;r...
mm
.....tnc
'" c...
C,;~ r '-
:::: '"""
...
r
:z ==
I.'
'",
....
C
..-
>- c..;w
:;.:NC"-
C CJ < i""..
Ac..~
::> .-. c \"...
ON
....
I.H ;0 N
I." c:: .&-
;oVl
o"'\,,<
m ...
:=>r
<rc
rn u
:::....
Z VI
~ i,Xl
-.::
~
;;::
:>
....,
;0
~
n
....
:>
VI
...,
1..-0
C
...
:=-,,'-:0
Z \,., rn I.H
o l....c.;., \".;
ANr
:;,. C'C 1..,
VlN
l;)A
r-<N
> .&-
0'-
....0\,.0
o:::~
rz
:> a
....,0
Z N
Cll"OO
Z
....
n
c;..
r
:>
:;;:
l.il
\,.;
1...
'-
.'
::-
>-0::;
_L...t..Iw_
\".' .... ...... '-.
el...C
<... t,.1...
m :;,. r,,;
;:c "....
r
:=0
o
....
c
r
::>
1"...
:;:....
;0
z: l..
c...
r
o
..-
C
C
e,,-:;;...; \"'..
-t ....
~
;;;:
,",
...,
V.
l...
....
:::....A~;;)
...... l......> '-..
o \......-.t 1,....
01.... =:
<:c..c.....
rn ZN
:;::Q r:1
.....:::N
0::;......
m;;o
rol..-o
~r'"
mo
0-
(,1
'"
o
...,C
i.".I
C;N
c.n m
...., ....,
....,
-<
:::.z
Z:r.
...,
VI
....
C
...
...to;o
I.H:PI..-o
"-'f......t.H
VI;o
,::.. 0 l... I
NI
l'
:P
Z
C1
o
<:
m
:ac:-.
r
:P
0::;
....
o
r
:P
:a
....NI
n.&-,
I
i
!
:PI..-o
:a.&-
o
C
"'0
Z N
Cll"o-
n
:::
IJ1
,-"
\".
'-
....
;0
~
("
....,
....
r:t
:.-.....-0;;;:
-1....;.;;......
01......... \...
o...n
<....~ rn......
m ......
::tl
C;~ =
r......".J
>n...
<:;
....:.- 1...
em...
rr
:>
=::
c
'-C
t.
......
;;.;
\",
l.il
1..-.
c..;
.-
>-iJ_
::: \",.1 :;,. v..
c t....c i"."Il
o ....r
< <..-""""'l \",-.
rn ON
;;o~Z
r
>=u.....
00
..... C",. 1....
o rn .....
r;::J
>
o
~o
rJ
:l:;~c...
3
Z
r
m
~
-
-
V.
\..Ii
....
o
:-
rn
;0
n
n ...&3::0
o....no
o r.J n .&-
=::...>
C~""
z...
;0
:>l;)
-or:PN
....:PC....
000
"'....;ON
om-
r-<
> a
;ac
"'"
...,
Z
:[;
,
'-',
...'
....
"'.
....
n"'~::';:
<.;; I.......l,.;
<.;; r~ r....
_ 1,.;. (.r1
t..: '-' \,..
z...
;;u
:P C;~
"";lr
....>
oom
c"i ~ Q rl",,)
r.:;o.....
r~
>;;.J
m
...., r..
",.
c
c
- \.,
_::l;.;
'-
;0
__ ii;..
,-"
\./1
.&-
.&-
....
...
N
:>
z
C'
o
<:
m
:c c;-,
rmN
><...
0>
.....Zl",oi
C ...
r'-
>
...::,;;;
t.......:> \.r-l
"''II n v..
..., A
\,.'i in w..
-<N
o
'-::..0
N
...
('l
-1~
m
zr
~>
==
~
rn
V1
VI
I..
o
...
'"
n~;a:o
Ol..-,OC
ONe.;....
z...-m
",,:a 1..-0
;0 -t....
:P"''''
-or N
....o:a.&-
o;uo
"'>ON
Z....
zm
:[;-<0
o
rl..-o
....
110
;:;
'-
C
t;I
-<
'",
,",
...
z
~..
....
n....C,;o
C I..r C;
c. r _ (..") ...
_1..0
....~\".
...
J-o"'=
-0 r ,..~
~C,C''''
1;;;>;;
c..-1:> ,-". r"-.;
....
~
_:>c
-c:;
::> l...
,..
~
-
>
""
m
;0
7-
r
,",
\.I,
.&-
.-
'-
n .....""._
C I.. C C
~ r..l to ...
;;. \..i~ (T'l
c.,.... ;c 1....
:::; --
)> Ci c::
-or....N
..... :> (,,1 ....
oe"'"
"'.... N
COO....
r:>
><:C
~o
zc\.N
>: ...
r
"""
.:::.
Z A
:>
V1 :a
V1 rn
... -
....
co
n....oxr
o I."r 0
ON"'...
z.&-o
oOZI..-o
:a ...
>"'0
"'Jr:p""
~OZ.&-
0;0.....
"':PmN
r-
z
:C'-C
o
Ii"N
c..
'-
).-
-
-
-
V1
...,
...
.&-
(..
n ... :: :0
c \,,;.c:..~
c;..1..r....
.."'or
... ;.. 1...
-.;. ...
C
:a
>"T1
-or
...... en,...
0:0>
"'~ >- r N
<....
-....
x:_c
l...
C1 r.;
-..;.
"..,
r.;
:;0
=
.... rn
,",
VI
......
...
....
n ::x
ONOO
0.0"'':-
:;:cm
C,;.;::=.J \.....
;;0 -"
:>"'A
-0 1.., rn N
...... \...ol ..... .t'
o;;o-t
v) 0 = N
...
:P:::
< 0
m .'~ 0
.....
:::no
s:
'-
-
Z
VI
VI
...
...
co
f,~..:"~;'$_eT"""''''.c-
~
'J"\ ~
\'-",::.
-::-f~~,
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
September 15, 1992
DATE
ITEM
NO.
J.
Timber Meadows
Sketch plan
.~
APPRO~E~,\:R
AGENDiu'
.J 1
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY: Andover Review Committee
The City Council is requested to review the proposed sketch plan
of Timber Meadows located in the N 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of Section
8-32-24.
The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the sketch plan
and their comments are as follows:
General Comments
* The proposed sketch plan is located in an R-l zoning District,
Single Family Rural. zoning District with a minimum lot size
of 2.5 acres. Twenty-five (25) lots are being proposed.
'---'
* All lots will be required to front and access city streets.
Lot 8 of Block 2 is proposed to access onto Tulip Street NW.
Variance from Ordinance 10, Section 9.02c will be necessary.
* The Orchid Street NW cul-de-sac will require a variance from
Ordinance 10, Section 9.03 (g) as the length exceeds the
variance allowed of 500 feet. The ARC is recommending that
both l68th Lane NW and l67th Lane NW run east-west from Tulip
Street NW and Round Lake Boulevard to eliminate the variance.
* All lots will require to meet Ordinance 10, Sections 9.06 a(3)
which relates to lot size requirements and buildable area.
* The developer is required to meet the standards of the Lower
Rum River WMO Water Management Plan when designing the
preliminary plat.
* The developer and/or owner will be required to obtain all
necessary permits (DNR, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coon
Creek Watershed District and any other agency which may be
interested in the site).
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
~1
~
,
~
, \
~~
* There are wetlands within the plan that must be delineated by
the agencies and indicated on the preliminary plat. The Local
Governmental Unit is the Lower Rum River WMO. The developer
shall contact the WMO to discuss the 1991 Wetland Act that is
in effect.
* The developer must comply with the Tree Ordinance and
Preservation policy and provide a tree protection plan when
submitting the preliminary plat.
* The developer is required to meet City Ordinances 8 and 10 and
all other applicable ordinances.
Remember: This has not been studied by Staff in detail as most
of the detail will be reviewed with the preliminary
plat process.
Planning and zoning Commission Comments
Generally, the Commission is recommending that either l67th Lane
NW or 168th Lane NW be constructed between Round Lake Boulevard
and Tulip Street NW as a through street.
Park and Recreation Commission Comments
The Commission is leaning to requiring the Park Dedication to be
cash in lieu of land.
,~'t(,'':~:>:_,"
(,".4~)~ '<~~
~ot
,,~
'" '2:,
"
CITY OF ANDOVER
''-_I
~~:;-.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
September 15, 1992
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
.(S~
ITEM Echo Ridge Sketch
NO. plan
BY: Todd J. Haas
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion Item
The city Council is requested to review the Echo Ridge sketch
plan (Wirkus property) which is being proposed by Tony Emmerich
and the proposed alignment of Commercial Boulevard.
In addition, Mr. Emmerich is also requesting the City to consider
acquiring the property indicated on the sketch plan for those
areas shown in green and blue. The area shown in red is a NSP
easement.
It is the staff's understanding that if the City is not
interested in acquiring these areas, or reimbursing Mr. Emmerich
for the cost of land then Mr. Emmerich will only develop the
Wagner, Mardous and Hunt properties into residential.
The alignment proposed for Commercial Boulevard is the alignment
that avoids existing structures.
.~./
Options Available to the City Council
1. Reimburse Mr. Emmerich for amount he paid to acquire the green
and blue areas of the Wirkus property.
2. Reimburse Mr. Emmerich based on fair market value of the
commercial zoned land in the green and blue areas of the
Wirkus property.
3. Give Mr. Emmerich credit for park dedication and call this
area an open space until such time the City constructs
Commercial Boulevard.
4. Do nothing.
Note: Mr. Emmerich would like the City to decide this issue at
the meeting because Mr. Wirkus has a purchase agreement
pending on property up north where he would like to move
his business, Freshwater Tackle.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
\
~~
/i~~)'?<!$."""~'::-- ...
~\'.
/"\ ''I.... y
~J'~':
. "~:-~, .
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
September 15, 1992
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
'!J
Planning ~
ITEM
NO.
.$".
~
'--
Amendment to Ord.
No.8, Section 6.02
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
B
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to approve the amendment to
Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02, Minimum Requirements in
regard to the sideyard setback. When the plans for the principal
structure accommodate an access for a deck there shall be an
additional five (5') feet added to the required setback.
BACKGROUND
The amendment is being proposed due to the number of variances
requested for decks encroaching into the required sideyard
setback.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW
The Planning and Zoning Commission met on August 25, 1992 and
recommends to the City Council approval of the amendment.
COUNCIL ACTION
~
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'-
'0
:J
,~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORD NO. 8YYY
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, KNOWN AS THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 is hereby amended as follows:
Section 6.02, Minimum Requirements
R-l R-2 R-3 R-4 R-5 Ml M2
Sideyard setback from
street: ^30 ^35 ^35 ****^35 ^20 ^30 ^30
Sideyard setback from
interior lot Line: ^10 ^10 ^10 ^10 ^10 ^20 ^30
Any yard setback
(major arterial): ^50 ^50 ^50 ^40 ^50 ^50 ^50
An additional five (5') shall be added when the plans for the
principal structure accomodate an access for a deck.
Adopted by the City Council this 15th day of September, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
u
Regular Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
August 25, 1992 - Minutes
Page 3
(Variance - 13316 Gladiola St., Cant.)
property located at 13316 Gladiola Street, legally described as
Lot 6, Block 1, Lundgren Oak ridge Addition for the following
reasons: 1) the individuals tried very hard to comply with the
various regulations and violation of the Shoreland Zoning
Ordinance was in error; 2) the deck and pool fit in nicely with
the surrounding area; 3) the DNR feels that approval would be
proper; 4) a public hearing was held. There was no opposition.
Motion carried unanimously.
~PUbliC Hearing - Amendment to Ordinance 8, Section 6.02
Mr. carlberg explained that the amendment would require a 15'
sideyard setback from the interior lot line when the plans for
the principal structure accommodate an access for a deck.
o
Commissioner McMullen stated that he would like to see no decks
allowed on the sideyard. He spoke to several builders and they
said that the sliding glass doors that are put on some houses
could easily be removed and moved to the back of the house.
At this time, Chairperson Dehn opened the public hearing. No one
appeared to give testimony.
MOTION by McMullen, seconded by Jovanovich to close the public
hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Apel, seconded by McMullen that the Andover Planning
and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of
an amendment to Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 to add an additional
five (5) feet onto the sideyard setback when the principal
structure accommodates access for a deck.
Motion carried unanimously.
Discussion - Ordinance No.8, Section 4.21- Fencing
MOTION by McMullen, seconded by Apel to table this item to the
next meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
Other Business
Mr. Carlberg stated that he is trying to schedule a meeting with
the auto recycling yard owners for September 8, 1992.
MOTION by McMullen, seconded by Apel to adjourn. Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 8:10 P.M.
~
Respectfully submitted,
(-. .I. I( ,f"7
{L,~ &'.rCL-
Vicki Volk
Acting Recording Secretary
':J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST F.OR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
August 25, 1992
AGENDA ITEM
5. Public Hearing
Amend Ord. No. 8
Sec. 6.02, Setbacks
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
-~
.
BY:
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review and
discuss the proposed amendment to Ordinance No.8, the zoning
Ordinance, Section 6.02, Minimum District Requirements. The
amendment would require a fifteen (15') foot sideyard setback from
the interior lot line when the plans for the principal structure
accommodate an access for a deck.
BACKGROUND
,
-------
Currently, Ordinance No 8, Section 6.02 requires a ten
(10') foot sideyard setback from the interior lot line. In
an R-4, Single Family Urban district, the setback from the
interior lot line for a garage or carport over twenty (20') feet
wide may be six (6') feet.
The reasoning for the increased setback is to eliminate the number
of variances for decks and to insure that the placement of the
home on the lot will accommodate an access when planned.
The Planning and zoning Commission should consider the setback for
accesses for decks on the sideyard from a street.
The City Council briefly discussed the proposed amendment when
reviewing the variance for a deck requested by Susan Ham at 1332
l37th Lane NW. A suggestion was made to have the Building
Department be responsible for determining and recommending the
proper setback when reviewing the plans for the principal
structure.
'-----'
-,' ......
'-J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORD NO. 8
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, KNOWN AS THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 is hereby amended as follows:
Section 6.02, Minimum Requirements
Sideyard setback from
interior lot Line -
access for deck: R-l
15'
R-2
15'
R-3
15'
R-4
15'
R-5
15'
Ml
15'
M2
15'
Adopted by the City Council this
day of
CITY OF ANDOVER
, 1992.
.~
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
ATTEST:
victoria Volk, City Clerk
"
,J
o
.-------
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA .
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:30
p.m., or as soon .nereafter as can be heard. on
TueSdav, August 25. 1992 at the Andover City
Hall, 168$ Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover. MN to
review an amendment to Ordinance No. I, Sec-
tion 6.02, which would require a fifteen (15') foot
sideyard setback from the Interior lot line when
the plans for the principal structure accOfno'
modate an access for a deck.
All wrmen and verbal comments will be
received at that time and location.
os. Victoria Volk
Victoria Volk. City Clerk ..
abcdefghljklmnopqrstuYWxyz
Published In Anoka Co. Union
AUQo:.. U.&!:I. 1992
:~
'\
~-)
PRINTER'S AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF MINNESOTA
County of Anoka
) ss
)
Peter G. Bodley, being duly sworn, on oath says that he is the managing editor of the
newspaper known as the Anoka County Union, and has full knowledge of the facts which are
stated below:
(Al The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification
as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other
applicable laws, as amended.
(B) Theprinted ... .NOnCE. Of. P.UBLIC. .HEARING............................
. . . . . , . . . . . , . . , . . . . . .Am.~n9. .Or,(jj !l.a Dc.e. 11$. .$~~.1; i 9.r! . ~'" 9~. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .
which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and
published once each week, for. . tWQ . . . successive weeks: it was first published on Friday,
the... .1Ll.th...... day of ... .AUgu.st..., 19.92, and was thereafter printed and
published on every Friday to and including Friday, the ..21.st..... day of
. . Aug~ust. . . . ., 19~ 92: and printed below is a copy of Ihe lower case alphabet from A to Z,
both inclusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the
composition and publication of the notice:
abcdefgh i i kl mnopqrstu\/wx yl
abcdefghi 'klmnopqrstuvwxyz
Subscribed and sworn to before me on
,19.92
IAAI.lIA~IA..""""'.~"."I"I."~
M DIXIE l. MASON
~..'"i NOTARY PUBLIC. MINNESOTA
, , . ,~ ANOKA COUNTY
~ t.Ay Commission expires May 10.1995 ~
)(""""""",,_,'1lYl""'YYYYVYS(
HA TEI:\FOR:\L\ TIO:\
(I) Lowest classified rate paid by
commercial users for comparable
space
$ 7. OQ...__..____
( Line, word, or inch ra tl")
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for the
above matter
$ 7.00
(Line, word, or inch rate)
(3) Hate actually charged for the above
matter
$ 4.55
(Line, word, or inch rate)
(I,. g~';3P--"""'C"':'
~~ '.
,- -. .~~ .,'
') \\
V ~':>>"':_d' ,_
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ITEM
NO.t.
Approve Bids Make-
up Air System
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
September 15, 1992
BY:
David L. Carlberg,
City Planner
AGENDA ~!qN Commi ttee,
NO. Commission
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to approve the low bidder for the make-
up air system for the Andover Senior Center. The bids have
not been received at this time, but will be presented to the
Council at the meeting.
~'
MOTION BY
/ '
, ,TO
...........-."
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
(.fA"'"
.,1'\'
~......,,~,",
CITY OF ANDOVER
o
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
September 15, 1992
DATE
ITEM
N07,
DNR Shoreland Grant
Application
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ~
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
r,
'22;
AGENDAs~~qrf9Ncommittee,
NQ Commission
BY:
REQUEST
The City Council is requested to determine whether the City should
apply for a grant from the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources to assist the City in adopting or amending a shoreland
management ordinance consistent with statewide standards. The
City may request up to $5,000.00 in matching fund dollars.
Attached for Council review is a copy of the application and a
Notice to Adopt Revised Statewide Shoreland Management Rules from
Paul Swenson, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
Staff asks direction from the Council on this matter.
o
COUNCIL ACTION
:~
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
SHORE LAND GRANT APPLICATION
"
WHEREAS, the State, as provided by Minnesota Statutes
103F.201-221 and Minnesota Rules parts 6120.2500 through 6120.3900
pertaining to Statewide Standards for "Management of Shore land
Areas"; and
WHEREAS, the State is authorized by the Laws of 1991, Chapter
254, Section 5, Subd 3 to provide grant assistance for cities to
adopt a shore land management ordinance consistent with statewide
standards.
NOW THEREFORE, subj ect to available funding, it is hereby
requested by the city of
that an
~ agreement be entered into by the State of Minnesota, acting by and
through the Commissioner of Natural Resources and the city of
, to provide grant money assistance up
to $5,000.00 matching fund dollars, for the purposes of adopting a
shore land management ordinance consistent with statewide standards.
BY:
Mayor
DATE:
:J
o
'.;m~DT~T~@U ~
~~DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
500 LAFAYETTE ROAD · ST, PAUL, MINNESOTA . 55155-40
DNR INFORMATION
(612) 296.6157
"
August 24, 1992
The Honorable Ken Orttel
Mayor, City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304-2612
Dear Mayor Orttel:
NOTICE TO ADOPT REVISED STATEWIDE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT RULES
On July 3, 1989, the revised Statewide Standards for "Management of Shoreland Areas" rules
became effective (Minnesota Rules Part 6120.2500 - 6120.3900), Under the authority of
Minnesota Rules Part 6120.2800, Subp. 2, you are hereby notified that your City/County must
upgrade its land use controls or shoreland ordinance by September 1, 1994, to comply with the
'\ new rules.
,.J
The rules were developed through a consensus process by 23 groups representing diverse
interests from agriculture and environment to local and state governmental agencies including
the Department of Natural Resources. A series of ten hearings before an Administrative Law
Judge in the fall of 1988 completed the public review process.
Notification and grant authorization is limited to counties and cities. Counties with townships
currently administering local zoning controls should notify their townships of the need to adopt
compliant shoreland ordinances and other land use controls (floodplain, wild and scenic rivers)
at the same time that the county upgrades its ordinance. This will allow the Townships to
maintain their zoning independence, if they so desire. Grant money is available to assist the
county in coordinating with its townships and municipalities that are also at work in adopting
the new rules.
The Legislature has provided grant monies to assist local units of government in adopting the
new shoreland rules. A grant application form is enclosed, Please return the completed form
by October 1, 1992, to Ed Fick, Shoreland Hydrologist, DNR-Division of Waters, 1200 Warner
Road, St. Paul, MN 55106, (612) 772-7910.
'1
,)
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
~J
~-)
~J
Page Two
The Shoreland Hydrologist is your primary contact for the grant application, contract, eligible
expenses, and related questions. Area Hydrologist, Tom Hovey, will be your primary contact
when it comes to the actual work of revising your zoning ordinance. Please feel free to call
upon them for assistance.
A series of Shoreland Workshops will be scheduled for Spring, 1993, to acquaint local units of
government with the new rules and local requirements. Your zoning administrator will receive
further information on the workshops once details have been arranged.
Sincerely,
Paul Swenson, Acting Administrator
Permits and Land Use Section
PS/OS:fw
Enclosures
cc: Ed Fick, Shoreland Hydrologist
John Stine, Regional Hydrologist
Tom Hovey, Area Hydrologist
Vicki V olk, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
Pam Albrecht
~~~;~":.:
\:)
/'~) ~,
~"~t,_,-- .
'- ~"--.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ORIGINATING
September 15, 1992
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Building
DATE
DEPARTM~
ITEM
NO.
/ '
'---...-
/--
'-I
MOTION BY
TO
Staff,Committee,Commission
R Vickstrom
Temporary Mobile Home Permit
BY: David Almgren
Due to fire at 14532 7th Avenue, I recommend approval for 90 day
temporary mobile home permit.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
o
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
90.DA Y TEMPORARY
MOBILE HOME PERMIT
PROPERTY OWNER Richard & Robin Vickstrom
ADDRESS 14532 7th Avenue NW PHONE 422-8103
MOBILE HOME OWNER A-I Mobile Homes Inc.
LOCATION OF MOBILE HOME 16700 Hwy 65 PHONE 434-6115
DATE (MOVE IN) Immediately
'-----') November 1, 1992
DATE (MOVE OUT)
REASON FOR MOBILE HOME Home Repair Due To Fire
SIZE OF MOBILE HOME
14' X 70'
DATES APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
APPROVED BY CI~r COUNCIL
DATE
All applications shall be made pursuant to Ordinance No.6, Section 2.
. )
~--
DA/jp
8/1991
~ )
\--.-/
, )
-- \
'-)
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
90'.DAY TEMPORARY
MOBILE HOME PERMIT
PROPERTY OWNER ?~/L~l'mO J- I< O/?j/V'
ADDRESS /'71.5:7 2- ? jft;r
VlLksT/( om
PHONE L722 -?lo]>
MOBILE HOME OWNER AI/7?ttJ/Le; J/o/VIE5 //l/c.
)
LOCATION OF MOBILE HOME /(; ?oo HLU JI 6 ~
I
PHONE 9'3l/- 6' liS-
DATE (MOVE IN) / Mm.
DATE (MOVE OUT) No V / /992-
REASON FOR MOBILE HOME 1-/0ME I?FP/7//( ;0 UE Te> h/?E
/ '7 'y /0 '
SIZE OF MOBILE HOME
DATES APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
APpROVED BY CI~Y COUNCIL
DATE
All applications shall be made pursuant to Ordinance No.6, Section 2.
DA/jp
8/1991
2)c/f1( C cJ ul.Jc J L I
.-J
J" ~~uLO L/k~ Yo U/( ;o~/?/?/??/0S0U
To PARK A /9 ~ ?cJ' r /;'~O/j'/LC Ao/Ylc
o AJ My ? oT /T T /c:y.s-:s 2 ? ~J-/ 4/l/Ct7UE/(
To lOUSE /nY F/I/?1n!/ cJr 6' ~o/Z Nor-
JnOKE TIJ/7N ?tJ ,0/1-/5, D UI< h O/YlC= / f
B~//Vj /ft3/'p:1TpfcL/ DUE rD "c- //'?E /fNL?
u-->!LL 8E L/~AL?LE BY /l./ov / 92
o
S>/l/C-G~!.y
;14LI;t y~
/PI C hA/'f () V LI/cK SfA' t1.1v]
/7"S32. ?~
/7'2 2. - ~ )03
~ "-
,_/
(171'"
" '\ \,1'\
'--) "'~,
,1:-".",
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
NO, Staff, Comm. Commission
September 15, 1992
Property Taxpayers'
Trust Fund Resolution
BY:
v. volk
;\ 1\ .
Ij'V
Admin.
Attached is a letter, along with other information, from
Councilmember Bob Long of the City of Saint Paul asking our
council to adopt a resolution concerning a constitutional
amendment to create a new property taxpayers' trust fund in
Minnesota.
I have prepared a resolution in the event council chooses to
adopt it.
V:Attach.
'--
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'-~
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
o
808 LONG
Councilmember
August 31, 1992
Dear Mayor:
As a local elected official responsible for delivering essential services to your constituents,
I am sure you are concerned about the continuing attacks on the property tax relief funds
in the Local Government Trust Fund. These attacks threaten to force local governments
to either drastically cut services or dramatically increase property taxes. If your constituents
are anything like mine you will agree that neither of these options will be acceptable.
o
We need to act now to protect the Local Government Trust Fund from the reductions or
elimination that will be proposed in the 1993 legislative session. The most effective way to
do this is through a constitutional amendment dedicating 2 cents of the sales tax to property
tax relief. These funds would be used to create a new Property Taxpayers' Trust Fund
which would guarantee that the property tax relief funds originally sent to the Local
Government Trust Fund would be used for property tax relief as was originally promised
by the Governor and the Legislature. With the 1992 legislative campaigns getting into full
swing and candidates from both parties looking for support, this is the year to get legislative
commitments for a Constitutional Amendment.
I am enclosing a sample resolution similar to one passed recently by the Saint Paul City
Council and several other city councils around the state. The resolution calls for a
Constitutional Amendment dedicating funding to a new Property Taxpayers' Trust Fund and
requesting the League of Minnesota Cities to make such an Amendment one of their
priorities in 1993. I am asking that your City Council consider passing a similar Resolution
during the next month so that we can begin talking with legislators. In addition to sending
a copy of your Resolution to the League, please also send me a copy so we can keep track
of which cities have acted.
Cities need a stable source of revenue not dependent on the property tax and not subject
to the political debate between the Governor and the Legislature that seems to go on every
year. Now that the sales tax has been raised to 6 1/2 percent and that sales tax is now
applied to local government purchases all in the name of saving property tax relief
programs, we must act to ensure that such property tax relief does in fact come to property
taxpayers from a new Property Ta:>..-payers' Trust Fund.
o
CITY HALL
SEVENTH FLOOR
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 551Q2
5.......
Printed on Recvcled Pane!
612/298-4473
I 1
In addition, I am enclosing three other items for your use and information: 1) a petition
for the Minnesota Property Taxpayers' Association (please get signatures and return to me);
2) a list of cities who have passed the resolution; and 3) a list of legislators who authored
bills supporting a constitutional amendment during the 1992 Legislative Session.
, .'
Thank you for your consideration of the Resolution. If you have any questions, please call
me at 298-4473.
\~~st re]d'
\,/ \
BOBL01G
Councilmember
, \
, I
\
I
/
Council File "
Green Sheet "
o
RESOLUTION
CITY OF , MINNESOTA
Presented By
Referred To
Committee: Date
1
'")
Resolution Concerning a Constitutional Amendment
to Create a New Property Taxpayers'
Trust Fund in Minnesota
~
,)
4 WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota enacted a 3% State sales tax in 1967 with the promise to voters
5 that the money would be returned to them in the in the form of lower property tax relief for property
6 tax payers; and
7 \VHEREAS, in 1991 the Governor and State Legislature approved the addition of a ~% increase in
8 the State sales tax, raising it from 6% to 6~% with 2c dedicated to fund the Local Government Trust
9 Fund which was created to continue the State's commitment to local property tax relief; and
10 WHEREAS, in 1992, the Governor and State Legislature extended the 6~% sales tax to local
11 government purchases with the promise of continued property tax relief through the Local
12 Government Trust Fund; and
o \VHEREAS, each year local governments are forced to combat continued attempts to reduce the
14 levels of State revenue dedicated to local property tax relief through cuts in programs such as Local
15 Government Aid; and
16 WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the State will face another budget deficit in 1993, making cuts in
17 local property tax relief programs tempting ways to solve the State's budget problems; and
18 WHEREAS, Governor Carlson has already publicly announced that he will concentrate on eliminating
19 local property tax relief programs during the upcoming legislative session; and
20 WHEREAS, the League of Minnesota Cities and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities have
21 taken positions supporting a constitutional amendment dedicating 2c of each 6~c collected from the
22 State sales tax to the Local Government Trust Fund if such dedication cannot be assured statutorily;
23 now, therefore, be it
24 RESOLVED, that the City of calls upon the State Legislature to support a
25 constitutional amendment dedicating 2c of each 6~c collected by the State sales tax to a new Property
26 Taxpayers' Trust Fund, to guarantee continued property tax relief from the current Local Government
27 Trust Fund; and be it further
28 RESOLVED, that the City of strongly urges that the League of Minnesota Cities and the
29 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities make one of their 1993 priorities support for a
() constitutional amendment dedicating 2c of each 6~c collected by the State sales tax to a new Property
31 Taxpayers' Trust Fund; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the City requests that the League of Minnesota Cities begin coordinating a series of
state-wide 'Truth in Taxation" meetings with property ta>:payers, to be held this fall, to educate the
public and candidates for State elected offices on the issues regarding the need for a constitutional"
amendment dedicating 2c of each 6~c collected by the State sales tax a new Property Tro:payers' Trust ' I
Fund to protect local property tax relief funds from budget cuts during the 1993 Legislative Session.
/ \,
, ;
! I Yeas Navs Absent
i I
I
I
,
I
I
I
,
,
Requested by Department of:
By:
Adopted by Council: Date
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
Form Approved by City Attorney
By:
3y:
Approved by Mayor for Submission to
council
:-)
Approved by Mayor:
Date
By:
By:
o
o
,-"
\J
August 28, 1992
CITIES ADOPTING RESOLUTION SUPPORTING CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
DEDICATING 2 CENTS OF STATE SALES TAX FOR PROPERTY TAX RELIEF
CITY (population)
DATE OF ADOPTION
BUHL (915)
CRYSTAL (23,788)
FAIRFAX (1,276)
FAIRMONT (11,265)
FALCON HEIGHTS (5,380)
July 7, 1992
July 21, 1992
July I, 1992
Aug. 8, 1992
Aug. 12, 1992
GRAND MARAIS (1,171)
KEEWATIN (1,118)
Aug. 12, 1992
July 8, 1992
July 27, 1992
MANKATO
(31,477)
MINNEAPOLIS- IGR Cmte. unanimously
(368,383) recommended Resolution
Res. scheduled to be heard
before full Council
MOORHEAD (32,295)
NORTH SAINT PAUL (12,376)
SAINT CLOUD (48,812)
SAINT PAUL (272,235)
TWO HARBORS (3,651)
WINNEBAGO (1,565)
July 20, 1992
August 3, 1992
July 20, 1992
May 26, 1992
August 24, 1992
Aug. 12, 1992
WINONA (25,399)
July 20, 1992
Julv 27. 1992
WORTHINGTON
(9.977)
Total Population Represented.................851,083
STATE LEGISLATORS WHO AUTIIORED BILLS SUPPORTING
CONS'J1TUTIONAL AMENDMENTS DURING TIlE 1992 LEGISLATIVE SESSION
Legislative
Legislator Bill District Hometown
Anderson, Irv HF 2289 HD3A International Falls
Bauerly, Jerry HF 2290 HD 18B Sauk Rapids
Beard, Pat HF 2241 HD 56B Cottage Grove
Bertram, Jeff HF 2405 HD 16B Paynesville
Bettermann, Hilda HF 2241 HD lIB Brandon
Bodahl, Larry HF 2292 HD 35B Waconia
Brown, Chuck HF 2291 HD l1A Appleton
Dauner, Marvin HF 2291 HD9B Hawley
Frederickson, DJ. SF 2519 SD 20 Murdock
Garcia, Edwina HF 2290 HD 40A Richfield
Hasskamp, Kris HF 2241 HD 13A Crosby
Jacobs, Joel HF 2291 HD 49B Coon Rapids
Johnson, Bob HF 2290 HD4A Bemidji
Kalis, Henry HF 2405 HD 29B Walters
Kelso, Bech.-y HF 2292 HD 36A Shakopee
Kinkel, Tony HF 2291 HD4B Park Rapids "\
)
Lasley, Harold HF 2292 HD 19A Cambridge
Lessard, Bob SF 2519 SD 3 International Falls
Mariani, Carlos HF 2241 HD 65B St. Paul
Milbert, Robert HF 2289 HD 39B South St. Paul
Nelson, Syd HF 2291 HD 12A Sebeka
Ogren, Paul HF 2289 HD 14A Aitken
Olson, Katy HF 2405 HD 28B Sherbllrn
Olson, Edgar HF 2289 HD2B Fosston
Ostrom, Don HF 2292 HD 23B St. Peter
Rest, Ann HF 2289 HD 46A New Hope
Segal, Gloria HF 2626 HD 44B St. Louis Park
Solberg, Loren HF 2405 HD3B Bovey
Sparby, Wally HF 2290 HDlB Thief River Falls
Steensma, Andy HF 2292 HD 27B Luverne
Thompson, Loren HF 2241 HD IDA Waubun
Wenzel, Steve HF 2290 HD 13A Little Falls
Winter, Ted HF 2405 HD 28A Fulda
, ,
o
THE MINNESOTA PROPERTY TAXPAYERS' ASSOCIATION
The Minnesota Property Taxpayers' Association is a non-profit
organization committed to protecting the interests of
residential and commercial property taxpayers in Minnesota and
preserving the state's property tax relief programs which have
been funded since 1967 with state sales tax revenue. The
Minnesota Property Taxpayers Association supports a state
constitutional Amendment to dedicate 2~ of each 6~~ of sales
tax collected by the state to a new Property Taxpayers' Trust
Fund to guarantee future property tax relief payments to
Minnesota's property taxpayers.
We the undersigned do hereby become a member of the Minnesota
Property Taxpayers' Association and indicate our individual support
for a Constitutional Amendment dedicating 2~ of each 6~~ sales tax
collected by the state to a Property Taxpayers' Trust Fund to
protect our property tax relief payments in the future.
NAME (signature)
ADDRESS
PHONE
; )
,
~
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
/ )
'-- 10.
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
~
A RESOLUTION CONCERNING A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO CREATE A
NEW PROPERTY TAXPAYERS' TRUST FUND IN MINNESOTA.
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota enacted a 3% State sales ta~
in 1967 with the promise to voters that the money would be
returned to them in the form of lower property tax relief for
property taxpayers; and
WHEREAS, in 1991 the Governor and State Legislature approved
the addition of a 1/2% increase in the State sales tax, raising
it from 6% to 6-1/2% with 2c dedicated to fund the Local
Government Trust Fund which was created to continue the State's
commitment to local property tax relief; and
WHEREAS, in 1992 the Governor and State Legislature extended
the 6-1/2% sales tax to local government purchases with the
promise of continued property tax relief through the Local
Government Trust Fund; and
WHEREAS, each year local governments are forced to combat
continued attempts to reduce the levels of State revenue
dedicated to local property tax relief through cuts in programs
such as Local Government Aid; and
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the State will face another
budget deficit in 1993, making cuts in local property tax relief
programs attempting ways to solve the State's budget problems;
,~) and
WHEREAS, Governor Carlson has already publicly announced
that he will concentrate on eliminating local property tax relief
programs during the upcoming legislative session; and
WHEREAS, the League of Minnesota Cities and the Association
of Metropolitan Municipalities have taken positions supporting a
constitutional amendment dedicating 2c of each 6-l/2c collected
from the State sales tax to the Local Government Trust Fund if
such dedication cannot be assured statutorily.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Andover
calls upon the State Legislature to support a constitutional
amendment dedicating 2c of each 6-l/2c collected by the State
sales tax to a new Property Taxpayers' Trust Fund, to guarantee
continued property tax relief from the current Local Government
Trust Fund.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Andover strongly
urges that the League of Minnesota Cities and the Association of
Metropolitan Municipalities make one of their 1993 priorities
support for a constitutional amendment dedicating 2c of each 6-
1/2c collected by the State sales tax to a new property Tax-
payers' Trust Fund.
~
~J
,J
~
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED the the City requests that the
League of Minnesota Cities begin coordinating a series of state-
wide "Truth in Taxation" meetings with property taxpayers, to be
held this fall, to educate the public and candidates for State
elected offices on the issues regarding the need for a
constitutional amendment dedicating 2c of each 6-l/2c collected
by the States sales tax a new Property Taxpayers' Trust Fund to
protect local property tax relief frunds from budget cuts during
the 1993 Legislative Session.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
15th
day of
September
, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Attest:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
~~"
~.,,;j"~" ""\.
~. ~
\; '..
- '\ ~l;~". .... /'"
V :<:;:_"
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
September 15, 1992
DATE
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Non-Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
ITEM Declare Cost/Order
NO, Assessment Roll/92-7/
BY:
Jim Schrantz
The City Council is requested to approve the attached resolution
declaring the cost and directing preparation of assessment roll
for the watermain improvement for Project 92-7, Grace Lutheran
Church.
They are being assessed for lateral benefit at a rate of $22/FF
and for the water connection charge that was not assessed in
1985.
Connection Charge
Lateral Cost
$8456.00
$7700.00
$16,156.00
Total Assessment
'-----
The estimated contract cost with overhead is $15,881.00.
The assessment covers the City's out of pocket costs when the
connection charge is included (connection charge is work
previously done on the resolution).
The one side benefit along the County Road is a City cost that
will be paid from the water trunk fund.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
,
'-I
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
~~ MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION
, FOR PROJECT NO. 92-7, GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$ 12,216.00, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $ 3,665.00 and work previously done
amount to $ 8,456.00 so that the total cost of the improvement will
be $ 24,337.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ 8,181.00 and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $ 16,156.00
2.
Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January 1993, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 7 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
"J
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
regular
meeting this 15th day of September, 19~,
with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
C )
,---
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
~..~,
r.,""~~;Y~'
'"
- - ,~
. .. ,}.
);~, ~
'-_/ ':'),'''-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
September 15, 1992
DATE
ITEM Declare Cost/Order
NQ Assessment Roll/92-9/
/ til.. 1" t:.." T ~ ~ ~ "TM
BY:
Jim Schrantz
APPROV~D OR
AGENDA
(-
BY: /
J
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Non-Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
The City Council is requested to approve the attached resolution
declaring cost and directing preparation of assessment roll for
project 92-9, street construction, l76th Lane NW.
This project was proposed along with a number of other projects
to be constructed in 1992. This was the only project that was
ordered. The size of the project made it very difficult to meet
the prices that were quoted at the public hearing.
The contractor on l68th Lane NW was willing to construct 176th
Lane NW as a change order to Project 91-14.
The project has 5 assessable units on this project. Three (3)
petitions for the project.
'-~~
The Council ordered the project as a change order to Project 91-
14, advising the property owners that if the cost exceeded more
than 5% more than what was stated at the public hearing the
property owners would be called for another public hearing.
The estimated cost per unit presented at the public hearing was
$5,394. The amount proposed to be assessed is $5,626 or 4.3%
over the estimate.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
SECOND BY
"-
'-..-
I TO
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
\
'- ~ MOTION by Councilman
:~)
- -,
J
-'-_./
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF STREET CONSTRUCTION
, FOR PROJECT NO. 92-9 176TH LANE NW
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$ 23,450 , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $ 4,680 and work previously done
amount to $ 0 so that the total cost of the improvement will
be $ 28,130
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ 0 and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $ 28,130
2.
Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January 1993, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 7 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
regular meeting this 15th day of September, 19~,
with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
l/~;:;~""""''''''''''''
f{
~ .
0'\",-. /'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion Item
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
September 15, 1992
ITEM Approve plans & Specs/
NO. 92-18/Watt's Garden
/.:3. ~ /."1"" !':t-
-("JJX
APPRO~~)::)OR
AGEND~
.J
v
BY:
Todd J. Haas
The city Council is requested to approve the resolution approving
final plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for
bids for Project 92-18, in the Watt's Garden Acres (Jay Street
NW) area for sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm drain
construction.
\.....-
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'--
o
~J
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
FOR PROJECT NO. 92-18, WATT'S GARDEN ACRES
AREA FOR SS, WM, STR AND STORM DRAIN
A RESOLUTION APPROVING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
(JAY STREET NW)
CONSTRUCTION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 145-92, adopted
Council on the 18th day of Au~ust , 19 92 ,
has prepared final plans and speclfications for project
for sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm drain
construction; and
by the City
TKDA
92-18
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications
the City Council for their review on the 15th
September , 19 92
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to
hereby approve the Final plans and Specifications .
were presented to
day of
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as
required by law, with such bids to be opened at
,19 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted
15th day of
by the City Council at a
regular
meeting this
September
, 19~, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution and
Councilmen
voting against same
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
~~.;~--""'~..'>,...,
it
0' \~,.
. ""'~~". ~
:~;...,-,-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO . . t
. Non-DlscuSSlon I em
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
September 15, 1992
ITEM Award Bid/92-13/
N3".4. Well #4
~
APPRO,ffiR
AGEND ~
.J
./
Engineering
BY:
Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
bids and awarding contract for the improvement of Project 92-13,
for Well #4 construction, in the area of 1785 Crosstown Boulevard
NW (near Tower #2).
The bid opening is scheduled for Monday, September 14, 1992.
Information on the bids will be provided at the City Council
meeting.
r -~
"-....
MOTION BY
/ "-
~' TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
, '\
\J
MOTION by Councilman
RES. NO.
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 92-13 FOR WATER SYSTEM - WELL #4
CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF 1785 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW (NEAR
TOWER #2)
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement
Council Resolution No. 155-92, dated
19 92 , bids were received, opened and
wi~esults as follows:
for bids as set out in
August 18
tabulated according
,
to law
o
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate
as being the apparent low bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into a contract with the
amount of for construction of the
improvements; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until
the contract has been executed and bond requirements met, subject to
legal agreement between the City and the developer for payments of
Alternates 1 and 2 which would be recoverable as an independent
charge in Weybridge 2nd Addition.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
meeting this 15th day of
City Council at a
September
regular
, 19~, with Councilmen
the resolution, and Councilmen
voting in favor of
voting
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
,.)
ATTEST:
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
~~~)>"::'--"",,.;,:>..,
t~_"
~J '!~)\ .f
'- -'-~t:-"_'d'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
September 15, 1992
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
~*
BY: Todd J. Haas
ITEM Accept Peti tion/Woodlan
NO, Creek 3rd Addi tion
/;5:
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Non-Discussion Item
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring
adequacy of petition and ordering preparation of a feasibility
report for the improvement of sanitary sewer, watermain,
street and storm drain, Project 92-20, in the Woodland Creek 3rd
Addition area.
Woodland Creek 3rd Addition is currently Outlot D of Woodland
Creek.
. "
""-,,,
COUNCIL ACTION
r "
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'"---",,
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
, '\
I
',J
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
SS, WM, STR, AND STORM DRAIN
PROJECT NO. 92-20 ,IN THE WOODLAND CREEK 3RD ADDITION
AREA.
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition, dated
September 10, 1992 , requesting the construction of
improvements; and
WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to represent the
signatures of 100% of the affected property owners requesting such
improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover that:
1. The petition is hereby declared to be 100% of owners of
property affected, thereby making the petition unanimous.
2. Escrow amount for feasibility report is
$1,000.00
. '\ 3. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to TKDA
,~) and they are instructed to provide the Ci ty Council wi th a
feasibility report.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
regular
Meeting this 15th day of
September
1992 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria volk - City Clerk
')
\.~_ .J
()
/ ')
~-
'\
" )
August 31, 1992
James E. Schrantz
City Engineer
CITY OF ANDOVER
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
Andover, 'Minnesota 55304
R EC E~ \fED'
I ~"e 1 0 1992._
CITY OF ANDOVER
RE: WOODLAND CREEK THIRD ADDtTION
Dear Mr. Schrantz,
Woodland Development does hereby petition for the feasibility study and the
drafting of the plans and specs for Woodland Creek Third Addition. The third
addition is located behind Meadow Creek Church and Crooked Lake Elementary
School. The said petition is unanimous and the public hearing may be waived.
The final plat has been calculated and is available upon request from Hakanson
Anderson Associates, located in Anoka. Minnesota.
I am asking that this letter be placed on the City of Andover Council agenda
for September 15 so that we may be able to start with the feasibility study
plans and specs as SOon as possible.
Sincerely,
Byron D. Westlund
Vice President
BDW:jah
830 West Main Street
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
(612) 427.7500
FAX: (612) 427-0192
.A'''~''~~_C_:'::
(!
"
,A
'0 '~\..>,.,
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
September 15, 1992
DATE
ITEM Approve Cedar Hills
N?~ Estates lst & 2nd
/-/. ""r~~"~
~:X-
APPROVED FOR
AGENa
BY:)
V
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Non-Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
BY:
Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving
the final street construction for Cedar Hills Estates and Cedar
Hills Estates 2nd Addition as being developed by Lawrence B.
Carlson in Section 5-32-24.
The street construction is complete and it is recommended to
approve the improvements.
By approving the resolution the $78,750.00 will be returned to
the developer but the development contract that is in place will
remain in place until September l5, 1993. This will give the
City control if the developer fails to correct any failures.
It is recommended that if you have not observed the development
that each member of City Council should, as Woodland Development
has done a very nice job.
/~
'---
COUNCIL ACTION
.
/
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'--
~~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL STREET CONSTRUCTION FOR STREET
CONSTRUCTION FOR CEDAR HILLS ESTATES AND CEDAR HILLS ESTATES 2ND
ADDITION AS BEING DEVELOPED BY LAWRENCE B. CARLSON IN SECTION 5-
32-24.
WHEREAS, the developer has completed the rural residential
street construction consistent to the Standard Specifications for
Rural Residential Street Construction for 5 Ton Bituminous Surface on
2.5 Acre Lot Development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby approve the final street construction of Cedar
Hills Estates and Cedar Hills Estates 2nd Addition contingent upon
providing the following:
1. Developer provide a 1 year warranty which includes all
improvements made which include, but not limited to, the following:
subgrade, Class V, bituminous, storm sewers, topsoil, seeding, etc.
from September 15, 1992 to September 15, 1993.
o
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
of September ,19 92 .
l5th
day
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
~
~J
o
'\
l
'J
August 31, 1992
R ~~ ~2!1~2ED
Todd Haas
ANDOVER CITY HALL
1685 N.W. Crosstown Boulevard
Andover, Minnesota 55304,
Dear Todd,
We have completed the work at Cedar Hills Estates I and II Addition and are
requesting a refund of our performance bond. I believe the amount is $78,750.
'If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please feel free
to call me.
SinCerelY',.LU\M~
B~e"'und
Vice President
BDW:jah
830 West Main Street
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
(612) 427-7500
FAX: (612) 427-0192
(~~F~"':O'J>C c..,
ff I
h
<, ,".
'.J'~ " _,1
\. ';':'~."" ,-
, ..~..
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
September 15, 1992
DATE
ITEM
NO,
Designate Xeon st.,
l49th Ave., & Jivaro
~
AGENDA SECTION
NO, N . . t
on-Dlsctlsslon I em
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
BY:
Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolutions
designating the following roads as Minimum Maintenance Roads:
1. Xeon Street NW from CSAH #16 (Andover Boulevard NW) to 149th
Lane NW
2. 149th Avenue NW from CSAH #9 (Round Lake Boulevard) to
Dahlia street NW
3. Jivaro street NW from 165th Avenue NW to l68th Lane NW
~
The Road Committee discussed the designation of these roads this
past summer and has recommended that these roads be posted.
The city staff has discussed the possibility of not maintaining
Jivaro Street NW with the City Attorney, but due to the fact that
the City has maintained the street over a long period will make
it impossible to eliminate the road from the City jurisdiction.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
1
'-_/
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING XEON STREET NW A MINIMUM MAINTENANCE ROAD
FROM CSAH #16 (ANDOVER BOULEVARD NW) TO 149TH LANE NW AS ALLOWED BY
MINNESOTA STATUE 160.095.
WHEREAS, the city of Andover has determined that this road
segment is used only occasionally or intermittently for passenger and
commercial travel; and
WHEREAS, the City of Andover will post signs at a entry points
to and at regular intervals along a minimum maintenance road where
warranted and signs posted must conform to the Minnesota Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city Council of the City
of Andover that Xeon Street NW be established as a Minimum
Maintenance Road.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
regular
Meeting this 15th day of
September
1992 ,with Councilmen
~~ voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
"
I
'.-j
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
" ,
)
',.-/
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ES~ABLISHING 149TH AVENUE NW A MINIMUM MAINTENANCE ROAD
FROM CSAH #9 (RCUND LAKE BOULEVARD) TO DAHLIA STREET NW AS ALLOWED BY
MINNESOTA STATUE 160.095.
WHEREAS, tte City of Andover has determined that this road
segment is used only occasionally or intermittently for passenger and
commercial travel; and
WHEREAS, tte City of Andover will post signs at a entry points
to and at regulcr intervals along a minimum maintenance road where
warranted and signs posted must conform to the Minnesota Manual on
Uniform Traffic control Devices.
NOW, THEREEORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of th City of
Andover that 14Sth Avenue NW be established as a Minimum Maintenance
Road.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
regular
Meeting this 15th day of
September
1992 ,with Ccuncilmen
\
~_Jting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
"
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
"
~~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
J
'-../
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ES~~BLISHING JIVARO STREET NW A MINIMUM MAINTENANCE ROAD
FROM 165TH AVENtE NW TO 168TH LANE NW AS ALLOWED BY MINNESOTA STATUE
160.095.
WHEREAS, tte City of Andover has determined that this road
segment is used only occasionally or intermittently for passenger and
commercial travel; and
WHEREAS, tte City of Andover will post signs at a entry points
to and at reguler intervals along a minimum maintenance road where
warranted and signs posted must conform to the Minnesota Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
NOW, THEREEORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover that Jivaro Street NW be established as a Minimum
Maintenance Roac.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
regular
Meeting this 15th day of
September
1992 ,with Ccuncilmen
'--) voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
, "
)
'~j
SEP-18-92 THU 13:43
t-" . 1::.'1:':::::
L.AW O""C~ OF
IJllrke IlHd .HIlWkiH$
:.J
JOHN M eUFlI<E
WlLLI"M G, H"WI<INS
SUITE 101
2gg COO,," AAPIOS BOULEV"RO
COON RI\PlO$, MINN!:SOTA :1:1433
~O""! Ie 12. 784-2gQ8
"
september 3, 1992
Mr, Todd Haas
Andover City Hall
1685 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
Re: Jivaro street Northwest
o
Dear Todd:
The following letter is written in response to your request that
I research to determine whether or not there is right-of-way for
Jivaro Street Northwest. My preliminary investigation indicates
that there was never a formal right-of-way dedicated to the
City; however, based upon the information that you have provided
I believe that right-of-way has been dedicated to the city
pursuant to the road user statute. You will recall that if a
City maintains a roadway continuously for six years it is deemed
to be dedicated to the public to at least the width of such
maintenance. I do not believe therefore that the City could
eliminate this road from sncwplowing and road grading at this
time.
The City would have the alternative of vacating the roadway;
however, it is my understanding that there is at least one
residence which receives access on this roadway. Since the road
does cross over other properties not owned by the landowner, we
would in essence landlock this property and I believe subject
the City to a potential claim for damages.
I believe that your alternative of making the street a minimum
maintenance road may be the most reasonable alternative that the
City has in dealing with the expensive costs of maintaining this
street to serve only one residence.
If you have any further questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
'_) William G. Hawkins
WGH:mk
160.09 ROADS, CE."1ERAL PROVISIONS
3784
160.09 CHANGE OF ROAD BY COUNTY OR TOWN BOARD.
Subdivision 1. Change in location. When the road authority of a county or town
changes the location of a highway or road under its jurisdiction, the old road shall
remain open until the new road is opened for travel. The old road or any portion
thereof shall not revert to the abutting owners until vacated by the road authority in
accordance with the law.
Subd. 2. Old roads to remain open. When the new road does not provide access
to property whose only means of access was the old road, then and in that event, the
portion of the old road providing the access shall remain open for travel and shall be
maintained by the county or town road authority until other means of access are
provided after which it may be vacated as provided by law.
Subd. 3. Not to be vacated in certain cases. When a county highway or town road
is the only means of access to any property or properties containing an area or
combined area of five acres or more, the highway or road shall not be vacated without
the consent of the property owner unless other means of access are provided.
History:' 1959 c 500 art I s 9
160.091 MS 1957 [Repealed, 1959 c 500 art 6 s 13]
~ 160.095 DESIGNATION OF MINIMUM-MAINTENANCE ROADS.
Subdivision 1. Resolution. A road authority, other than the commissioner, may
by resolution designate a road under its jurisdiction as a minimum-maintenance road
ifit determines that the road or road segment is used only occasionally or intermittently
for passenger and commercial travel. The resolution must identify the beginning and
end points of the road being designated. After adopting the resolution, the road
authority must post signs on the road to notify the motoring public that it is a
minimum-maintenance road and that the public travels on the road at its own risk.
A road authority must notify the road authorities of adjoining jurisdictions of designa-
tions under this section.
If an affected road or road segment runs along a county or town line, the designa-
tion applies only to that part of the road that is under the jurisdiction of the road
authority adopting the resolution. '
Subd. 2. Signs. Designation of a minimum-maintenance road is effective on the
erection of the signs required under this section. The signs shall be posted at entry
points to and at regular intervals along a minimum-maintenance road. Signs posted
must conform to the commissioner's manual of uniform traffic devices. - Properly
posted signs are prima facie evidence that adequate notice of a minimum-maintenance
road has been given to the motoring public.
Subd. 3. Limitations. A trunk highway may not be designated as a minimum-
maintenance road. A road may not be designated a minimum-maintenance road if
federal-state aid to Minnesota will be reduced as a result. A road authority may not
acquire additional right-of-way or easement by eminent domain or otherwise without
the consent of the landowner, for the purpose of constructing or designating a mini-
mum-maintenance road, except where necessary for drainage or public safety.
Subd. 4. Liability. A minimum-maintenance road may be maintained at a level
less than the minimum maintenance standards required for state-aid highways, roads;
and streets, but must be maintained at the level required to serve the occasional or
intermittent traffic. Where a road has been designated by resolution as a minimum-
maintenance road and signs have been posted under subdivision 2, the road authority
with jurisdiction over the road, and its officers and employees, are exempt from liability
for any tort claim for injury to person or property arising from travel on the minimum-
maintenance road and related to its maintenance or condition. Nothing in this section
shall exempt a road authority from its duty to maintain bridges under chapter 165 or
other applicable law.
History: 1985 c 215 s 3
:.
~
1
4
1
,
~
.,0
/~"'~-~":, ,
<<
0" \ '",
,,~
"~'1- "
:--..>- ,
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion Item
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
september 15, 1992
Engineering
ITEM Approve Carryover of
NO~ Park Grant Funds
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the carryover of any
leftover 1992 Park General Fund Budget for Kelsey-Round Lake Park
to 1993.
$20,000 was budgeted for 1992 but due to time constraints and the
survey that was required by the Minnesota Historical society we
will be unable to start construction this year.
It is recommended by staff to carryover this amount of $20,000
minus the fees to pay for the design work, etc.
\.....-
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
\.....-
rt--'
u\~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ITEM Approve Proclamation/
NO. Local Cable Prog. Week
.;; (J .
BY:
V. Volk
t.~'
AGENDA SECTION
NO. N . . t
on-D1scuss1on I ems
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
The City Council is requested to approve the attached
proclamation proclaiming October 5 - 11 as Local programming
Week.
'--
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
\..-
, \
'--)
'\
oJ
" )
PRO C L A M'A T I
o N
.J
WHEREAS, local cable programming brings our community's
political, educational, cultural, sports and special events to
television; and
WHEREAS, local cable programming is produced in conjunction with
a variety of community groups, including Anoka-Hennepin School
District, Anoka Area Chamber of Commerce, League of Women Voters
and other civic organizations; and
WHEREAS, 84 hours of original local programming are cablecast
each week; and
WHEREAS, Quad Cities Community Television is making it possible
for this community service to be brought to Andover; and
WHEREAS, nine thousand citizens in Andover are served by Quad
Cities Community Television; and
WHEREAS, the partners in local cable programming are to be
commended for their efforts to keep local citizens in Andover
informed, enlightened and entertained.
NOW" THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby proclaim October 5 - ll, Local Programming
Week.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Attest:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/I4~:3PJ&'T''''I\~:> ...,..
~,','
''1~'
, "':\ 0,
J -" '
, ',~,
',--~ . "~~"- "'-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
September l5, 1992
DATE
ITEM Refund Escrow/88-6/
NQ Kensington Estates 3rd
BY:
Shirley Clinton /7:)
Ci ty Treasurer \..JL
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Non-Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to authorize the release of
the development contract escrow for Kensington Estates Third
Addition.
BACKGROUND
The City has been holding an escrow of $39,020.00 to secure the
payment of the assessments as required by the development
contract. The assessments on all lots have been paid and
therefore, the escrow is no longer required.
,~
The developer has posted a cash escrow. Upon City Council
approval, this escrow will be returned to the developer.
A check has been prepared and is included in the list of bills to
be approved at this meeting.
COUNCIL ACTION
"
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
',-",
------
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Non-DiscuSSion Items
DATE Senh'mhpr ''''
=-
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
Daryl E. SUlander~
BY: Finance Director
ITEM Amend SchedUle of
NO. Bills dated 9/15/92
REQUEST
The Ci'y Council is regnes'ed '0 amend 'he schedule of bills
da'ed 9/15/92 '0 include 'he fOllowing 'hree claims,
Vendor Name/
Description
1. Minn. Dept. of Revenue
QUarterly Water Quality
Fee per connection
Amount
Account
Name/No.
Inv.No. .
$2,240.00
Water Quality Fee
601.49440.386
2. Ramwear, Inc.
6 Turnout Coats, Pants,
Suspenders
4,064.48
Equipment
501.49200.580
716
3. Smeal Fire Equip. Co.
5 Yellow Helmets
566.82
Equipment
101.42200.580
127115
Total Amended Amount
$ 6,871.30
9/15/92 Schedule of Bills 951.560.32
Total Amended Sch. of Bills $958,43l.67
MOTION BY
TO
=
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
--~
&~"':~'
fl
'1
;~
\~\.
-:"',
--
- -- ----
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
<-~~-
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Non-DisCUSSion Items
DATE Senremher 1 <;
=-
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
"
Daryl E. SUlander~~
BY; Finance Director
ITEM Amend Schedule of
NQ Bills dated 9/15/92
REQUEST
The City Council i, requested to amend the schedule of hills
dated 9/15/92 to include the fOlloWing three claim"
Vendor Name/
Description
1. Minn. Dept. of Revenue
Amount
Account
Name/No.
Inv.No. .
QUarterly Water Quality
Fee per connection
$2,240.00
Water QUality Fee
601.49440.386
2. Ramwear, Inc.
6 Turnout Coats, Pants,
SUSpenders
4,064.48
Equipment
501.49200.580
716
3. Smeal Fire Equip. Co.
5 Yellow Helmets
566.82
EqUipment
101.42200.580
127115
Total Amended AmOunt
$ 6,871.30
9/15/92 Schedule of Bills 95l,560.37
Total Amended Sch. of Bills $958,431.67
MOTION BY
TO
~
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee, Comm
DATE
September 15, 1992
ITEM
NO.
Approve Bid - Make-up
Air System - Senior Ct .BY:
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning '~
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
B
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to approve and award the
bid for the make-up air system for the Andover Senior Center to
SYSCO, MINNESOTA.
BIDS RECEIVED
SYSCO, MINNESOTA
BID
-
$14,825.00
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
SYSCO. Minnesota
~
SEPTEMBER 10. 1992
R ~<~ ;,'I~ ED
VICTORIA VOLK
CITY CLERK
CITY OF ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD N.W.
ANDOVER, MN 55304
..-
CITY OF ANDOVER
RE: BID FOR CANOPY AND MAKE-UP SYSTEM FOR ANDOVER SENIOR
CENTER
DEAR MS. VOLK:
SPECIFICATIONS FOR EXHAUST CANOPY AND MAKE-UP AIR SYSTEM PER
APPROVED DRAWING SUBMITTED TO ANOKA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
AS FOLLOWS:
1 EACH
STAINLESS STEEL FRONT DISCHARGE CANOPY 18 GAUGE AS
MANUFACTURED BY PREFERRED SHEET METAL.
ABOVE EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED, LESS ROOF WORK, ALL ELECTRI-
CAL AND PLUMBING.
6'X4' WITH (1) NFPA LIGHT FIXTURE. (3) STAINLESS
STEEL FILTERS. ANSUL FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM, STAIN-
LESS STEEL INSULATED WALL PANELS 6'X6' (1) LOT 16
GAUGE WELDED DUCT WORK. INSULATED THIMBLEY FLAT
METAL ROOF CURB, 2400 CFM @3/4 SP, RUPp 2400 CFM
MAKE-UP AIR SYSTEM WITH CURB AND DUCT WORK.
SINCERELY,
c:J::~
aM MARTI N
SYSCO MINNESOTA
TOTAL:
$ 14,825.00
CANDO_JM:RCR
(612) 785-9000 . 2400 COUNTY ROAD J . ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55112-45n7
---
~'
MEETING,DATE: September 14, 1992
AGENDA NUMBER: 8
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
Request for Board Action
BACKGROUND
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
On August 25, 1992 the District received a reVised copy of the
Andover Local Water Plan.
MS 1038.235 reqUlres local units of government to develop local
water plans that are consistent with the District comprehensive
plan.
The City Submitted its first draft to the District on January 15,
1992. That plan was reviewed and discussed by the Board at its
January 16, February 24, and March 9 meetings. On March 9 the
Board adopted resolution 92-06, extending the review periOd of
the Andover Water Plan.
ISSUES/CONCERNS
1. Process: Draft policy 4.7 lays out the procedure for revlew
and approval of local plans.
The first step is for the Board to
with the District's Comprehensive
receive comment from the public.
review the
Plan within
Thirty days
plans conformance
30 days, and
Would be October 6.
RECOMMENDATION
ACknowledge receipt of the plan and set hearing for September 28.
--- - -
- -- --
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
PERMIT REVIEW
n~~1:~9:W.
===;ftY--;;;-- -'.
Of: .4 Nr"l()VF:R
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA NUMBER:
FILE NUMBER:
ITEM:
September 14, 1992
~/S-
2-1-92-54
G & R Elevator
APPLICANT:
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
Tom Ryan
R. J. Ryan Construction, Inc.
5511 Cedar Ave. South
Minneapolis, MN 55423
PURPOSE: Construction of BUilding addition on 1.5 acres
LOCATION: Andover, Section 34, Andover Commercial Park
APPLICABILITY: Any activity involving drainage, or filling
of wetlandS.(1.0S)
EXHIBITS: Letter of Transmittal from Tom Ryan dated 8/18/S2
Plan sheet signed and dated 8/3/S2
Copy of plat
Copy of TR-S5 calculations
Notes form 9/8/S2 Telephone conv with 0 Claridge,
JMM, on Curb breaks
CONSIDERATIONS:
FINDINGS:
Wetlands: Wetland are adjacent to the site
Floodplain: No floodplain iSsues
Seils: Sa~tel1 fine sand
Stormwater & HYdraulics: Storm water flow is overland to
adjacent wetland at 3 cfs in .1 hrs. through rip-rap
structure.
Groundwater: Greater than 8 feet
Wildlife: Siting of Loggerheaded Shrike _ not of concern
D1tches: Drains to ditch 57 through municipal system
Erosion control escrow: $580
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with receipt of $580 escrow and
installation of curb with Curb breaks and rip-rap to
mitigate flows to wetland area.
" '
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA'
FILE NO.:
ITEM:
LOCATION:
~ , PUItPOSE:
APPLICANT:
APPLICABILITY:
EXHmrrs:
, CONSIDERATIONS:
FINDINGS:
<...... ~
- ',~,.
. ..- .:.
.,,~ ,.','.."
;-1',-.. ..-
.~ ~:..~~:~: ~~.;F~,;l~;:/':~
.. .. ';~ . -', .~
",;"-,,,.,"..-':.;. .
. . X.~"~. -. ""l .~;_ :. ..
. ~....~,\.. . . ":..:'"~.,.
. -,,~~...t.-;::..~~_~.... ':.
~"I,,',.r"~, ,.
. 4 ,~:,~-'~":~>'::;~'~.- ~
,~.'," t:'t~~0!Yi:.~;~. :J~-
"":';.-" .
f~~:~~:t,~. -.
_A~:J .,.'". _ .._
y~' " .
of."
-- --- ........ V "'''''':::4
- ~I:.-t" -Ul:$ . ':;i~ --I: ~'::j -NO .UU,5 -,.r~U~ --.--_ _
COON CREEK WATERsHED DIS'fRICl'
PERMrl'REvIEW
DEe tl Via
nl oti' j 4 1992 'U..
~P~bor14,1992
1$
2-1-92-26
Pheasant Meadows
Andover, Soction 34, west of Jay Street at 134th Lane.
,". Construction of a 28 lot, single family residential subdivision.
, , .
:.., .-
.~. .,', ~;'---'~~":,!
Roger Hokanson
9174 Isanli Street
Blaine, MN li5434
"
Control of erosion Ilnd siltation from drainage 0.15).
Permit appliclltion received Au~ st 17, 1992.
Rough grading pllln by It Nolson EniPneering, Augullt 17, 1992.
Wetlands:
No wetland issuell On this site.
Floodplainll; The projoct is located outside the noodplain.
Soils:
No soil rostrictions for this type of project are noted on
tho site. Additional silt fence llhould provided along
the south side of the llite. Tho cutch basins should bo
protected with lltakod straw bales and rock cntrance
bermll providcd lit construction entranccs.
.. "
'.
"" I ..
Sturmwutor & Hydraulics: Pondlng for watcr quality has not been
proposed for this site. Stormwator discharcell to the
northwest into a ncarby watland.
i
. .
,
: ':'.1
..: .'~
GroundWAter; No iToulldwlIter Issues.
Wildlife:
No wildlife Issue..
Ditches:
Drain. to Dil.ch 57 (Coon Creek),
UWlity Line Croning.: None noted.
Erolioll Control Escrow: $500 + 9.4 ac ($501ac) . $970.00.
'. --t',..
" ~
"
_: ~:: f;::'-.~:~ :-":..:-<
..~..... :....r,;:
...-....- :i.,"':,-.
. .'
-~' -",~_,,-,!:,;~,
. ." ..,:-;;.,..... .-.'
., ..J.,:" ,'-.' '_ "I ',"
;"-','.~~".o ~_.~ f:~':
' .....~~fI-..~'-'
," . ~':'; ;~ir{~:',
, ::"-0, ~"'~~T-'\'y"
" . ';": lL1te*\;:._ .~
:. .: ;.:~~: t..:\:;';
r.-~':~~~....~:l~>.
.-.,t.~~~...I:....
---"'."'- """,-qL~4
-SEP-08 . 92
7 :S9-No':-003-P:-03--
.. <.',
--..~' 1
--'?:,:"
';.~
::?~..~~ .
. ..... ....
. -"--
,-~"J;~'~-'"
..... -~..
'.: '"~ ' c,: ,~..
Aji:,~tt~D::;, ", ,
'CU~+~~;::/ COON CREEK WATERsIrEn DISnucr
".~L':.;.?! -' PERMIT REVIEw
>. ': ',:;'~':':: (Continued)
.f""J~,-~:..f:~:~:-:
.:' ?".._/~":'~:_1'~;:
MEETING DATE:' -'c'\:~' September 14,1992
,AGENDA , _:;l"~:/"
f., FILE NO.: .:~>~'.}~. ~~ 'I~ ,\,2..1...92..26
;< ITEM: :,;~.":-: .: Pheasant Meadows
RECOMMENDATION: Table pending receipt of:
" ,:<:~;~~~~~~t\, 1.' Er~~ion control escrow.
'....~, '.
......,
.~"': .
"
": ,
'~' .
0,
'.,'
"~~~'.'
.."
"
,.,..~ . - '"
.~ .) ;~.
~~~:~ :~~ ~~~: .'
"
.'. ~
. A,:' ; _.'
, ..: '.<.:~ ;ffi~:~ .:~~:,-:h:~.;;;:'i
f.. :....::.~~
J -~ ~~:.:~.~: ..
2. Grading plan $howinr silt fcnco along south property line botween
Lots 4 and 9.
'.
3. Wal.er quality pond at Lots 6 nnd 7, Block 3.
.
.
..-,
,-..
~. :.;:~.l_
_.-." ..~ ..
:~. ......
;.... ,,+.~j~~" >':'~~"
.- ,.-.,. -'..;'
4.i-.~ ~,. .-:-~.~::.~~ ,'.
...+ ':__', l".)~~,.::;;~,~
: <.,..-
'-~
J',
".~
0, '
"
. j ~'....
.. . >!..; ~
.... .. :'.~~J_: ~ ;,.... ~'..: \,.:
'1-.;-
4 ..; "
'.0 '... .'.
..
.. ~.:
'.
,
~Y;'..
".
o' --0..:
~:. :..:
~-...~:
:....
'j;-
. -
.'.#." .-
.",:,t-~:
..'" '.. ':j.'~-.::'"
-..-:"--~ ;-:.:
'.
"
.......
"'.c~J~t%.~~:x;~~~~~:;:~l'
.. (~ "'" 'r'" u~, .....~ ').-~~~- ~:,.~.., ~i1.iC':~ ~~ '4.
-':.< . ~",:;.. : 1', ''''I,!;,-'1<:'.'J. '>I'~~~'i!;i:r,;i'f' :7i.~' ,,,';!,',
...1 "'~''''''-' -{",,:wl-.:-:~ 11"'''''1f"'~,! ..)t........:;-......~r, -"""-c ....:"..,.
..." ;-. .. ~..tf::. -.:.~ y;~~: IL .. ~\':f-...~~"" :~':;;;" '~.. 1.
.. . 0 "-....(....~ .(.~ ;!':.~~'~I..~: ...~.....'W....,~ .....
"", ~":-!>;':$,,:;y ~'. 1~~" ~"~"" 5.*'''' '.........
',/:,.. '~.~>.~= .,*'~:~;..,~..~~f-;:-.~-. "t:.~!!
',......4"~~.~'tr. .. ..,..!....~'"'''-~.J. ~!.;.
' - - .." "-. - ", '. . '..;. " ". ;"<:'-:',"r.".'\ ?
" .'? ":;::~" ~ --~. . -:; ".:~,-, i~ .; .;-';;', ~';. '. . ,
~ 0 . ..
......
~ ~~~j~.~ ..~~.;
....':.-.
.
.'
"';';
- .,
"
--- -
AGENDA
COON
CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT R'" E,C ~I V-
BOARD OF MANAGERS ~ l:D
September 14, 1992 ,
7:30 PM ~i:? 141992 '
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Open Mike
POLICY ITEMS
4. Approval of Minutes
5. Receive Monthly Financial Statements
6. Approve Bills
7. Review of Draft 1993 8udget
8. Receipt of Revised Andover Water Plan
PERMIT ITEMS
9. TH 242/CSAH 19 Traffic Control (92-24)
10. Pheasant Meadows (PAN 92-26)
11. KolOdjski property on Constance (PAN 92-40)
12. MNDOT TH 10 Culvert Cleaning (PAN 92-61)
13. Aberdeen Oaks (PAN 92-62)
14. Peterson: DitCh Construction (PAN 92-63)
15. G & R Elevator (PAN 92-64)
16. Ostregren Pond Wetland Conversion (PAN 92-65)
17. Davenport Pond (PAN 92-68)
DISCUSSION ITEMS
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
18. Receive Staff Report
NEW BUSINESS
ADJOURN
,.~
CITY Ot: ^~I~""~n
---
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS' MEETING
August 24, 1992
The Board of Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed DistrIct held
their regular meeting on August 24. 1992 at the Bunker Hills
Activities Center.
Present: Bob Boyum, Reggie Hemmes, Eldon Hentges, LuEllen
Richmond, Paul Williams.
Staff: Tim Kelly, Kathy Tingelstad. Michelle Ulrich, Ed
Matthiesen.
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:36 p.m.
2. Approval of the Agenda: Amended to move up permit items 10 and
1" since the applicant was in attendance, and the addition of
three items under Informational Items relating to a stUdy of
financing water management by the University of Minnesota Center
for Urban and Regional Affairs (CURA). hiring a student intern
and Shamrock Development. Moved by Richmond, seconded by
Williams. Motion Carried with five yeas (Boyum. Hemmes, Hentges.
Richmond and Williams) and no nays.
Policy Items
3. Open Mike: No one was present to speak on this item.
4. Approval of August 10, 1992 Minutes: Motion to approve
minutes was moved by Williams, seconded by Richmond. Motion
carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges. Richmond and
Williams) and no nays.
5. MAWD Resolutions: Yoelly presented the background on this item.
There was discussion about the wording in the resolution about
Water Plans for State and RegIonal Facilities. Ulrich corrected
the Minnesota Statute of 80A to ChaPter 85A. An amendment was
made by Hentges and seconded by RIchmond to add the following
WOrding at the end of the seCond "Be it resolved- in the Water
Plans resolution: -Including highway, county and state hIghway
construction and maintenance.- MotIon to adopt the follOwing two
resolutions, as amended was moved by Hentges, seConded by
RiChmond. MotIon carrIed with fIve yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond and Williams) and no nays.
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
RESOLUTION 9Z-10
WHEREAS, Watersheds are special taXing Districts authorized by
Minnesota Statute 1030; and,
RELATING BENEFITS AND REVENUES TO THE RUNOFF FROM PROPERTY
WHEREAS. The purpose of Watershed are to conserve natural
resources USIng SOund scientific prinCiples; and,
WHEREAS, Water is the natural resource most at issue in
develOPIng and financing capital Improvement or maIntenance
projects; and.
WHEREAS, The speCial assessment of benefited propertIes has
historICally been the financing tool enCOuraged by legISlatIon;
and,
Page 2. COon Creek Watershed District _ August 24, 1992
WHEREAS, The present methods for determining the benefits of
water resource projects is expensive, SUbject to considerable
professional discretion and increasingly difficult as project
benefits. such as water Quality, become more indlrect and long
term; and,
WHEREAS, The Quantity and Quality of water from property has
more to do with the land use and size of the property than lts
market value; and,
WHEREAS, The amount of water that needs to be cOnveyed away from
a property to prevent flOoding or ensure that the property is
tillable can be determined using Sound scientific prinCiples;
and,
WHEREAS, A philosoPhy of payment for services or, user fees has
been encOuraged over use of general property taxes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That determination of beneflts
based on runoff coefficlent from a property is a more eQultable
way of determining the benefit of COnveying water, whether it is
for agricultural drainage or urban storm water.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, The legiSlature is enCOuraged to
incorporate this concept into legiSlation addressing the
finanCing of water Quantity and Quality programs at the local
level.
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
RESOLUTION 9..t-l1
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 103B, and 1030 encourage and require
counties, cities, watershed districts, and watershed management
organizations to prepare comprehensive plans for managing water
and related land resources within their jurisdiction; and,
WATER PLANS FOR STATE AND REGIONAL FACILITIES
WHEREAS, Within the boundaries of these units of government
there may be state and regional facilities and lands; and,
WHEREAS, These facilities and lands are part of the hYdrOlogy of
the government unit; and,
WHEREAS, For comprehenSive management to be effective, the
managing agency needs either Control or assurance that water
management is being Conducted in a prUdent and provident manner;
and,
WHEREAS. The State of Minnesota in the 1991 Minnesota Water Plan
is Seeking to refine a coordination strategy for water
management, and wishes to make local water plans a highly ViSlble
element in that coordination.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, The Minnesota state
legiSlature require water planning for all state lands classified
under Under Mlnnesota Statute 8eA, and Regional facilities
classified under Mlnnesota Statute 473, inClUding county and
state highway constructlon and maintenance.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT. That these plans be coordinated
Wlth either the county plans or the watershed plans.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT. The legiSlature address the issue
of local recovery of proportionate costs of capital lmorovements
associated with the management of water emanating from state and
regional faCilities.
- -- ----
Page J. Coon Creek WaterShed District _ August 24, 1992
Permit Items
6. Berg DrIVeway to Property (PAN 92-S5): Matthiesen preSented
the permit revIew. The purPOse of this project is constructIon of
a IS-foot by JOO-foot drIVeway to a building site in Ham Lake.
There was discussIon about alternative locations for constructing
this driveway. It was stated that fill of the wetland was
unavoidable and the proposal minImizes the prOPOsed fill area.
The applicant does not have access to the property from any other
direction, since the adjacent property is parkland for the City
of Ham Lake. Based on the findings in the permit review, it was
recommended to approve the permit. Motion to approve the permit
pending receipt of $SOS and CertIfication of the replacement of
the filled areas was mOved by Williams, seconded by BOyum. Motion
carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, RiChmond and
Williams) and no nays.
7. Pheasant Meadows Utilities (PAN 92-S7): Matthiesen presented
the permit review. The purpose of this project is utility and
street improvements in Andover. It was stated that the NWI map
shows a portion of the area as a Wetland, but an inspection by
Kelly showed that no wetland was present. Based on the fIndings
in the permit review, it was recommended to approve the permit.
Motion to approve the permIt with the stipulation that the '.
contractor obtain a District Permit and post a S500 erosion
Control escrow was moved by Boyum, seconded by Hentges. Motion
carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, RiChmond and
Williams) and no nays.
S. Hidden Creek 5th AddItion (PAN 92-58): Matthiesen preSented
the permit reVIew. The purpOse of thIS project is utility and
street Improvements to Hidden Creek 5th Addition in Andover.
Based on the fIndings in the permit reView, it was recommended to
approve the permit. MotIon to approve the permit WIth the
stipUlation that the contractor obtain a District PermIt and post
a $500 erosIon control escrow was moved by Boyum, seConded by
Williams. Motion carrIed with fIve yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
RiChmond and Williams) and no nays.
9. CSAH 14--Between Radisson & Lexington (PAN 92-19): Matthiesen
preSented the permIt review. The purpOse of this prOject IS
grading, aggregate base, bituminous surfacing, signal systems,
and mitigation for road repair in BlaIne. Kelly Stated that the
wetland mitigation plan Came about because the County needed sand
and the City of Blaine needed pondlng. Based on the findings in
the permit review, it was recommended to approve the permIt.
Motion to approve the permit WIth the stiPUlation that the
contractor ObtaIn a DIstrIct Permit and post a S15,OOO erosion
COntrol escrow was moved by Hentges, seconded by BOYum. MotIon
carried WIth five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, RiChmond and
Williams) and no nays.
10. Blaine Sr. HIgh AthletIC Fields (PAN 92-59): Kelly presented
the permit review. The purpose of this prOject is constructIon of
an athletic field in Blaine. The apPlicant, Tom Redmann from the
SChool DistrIct was in attendance. He Stated that since the HIgh
School would now be hOUSing grades 9 through 12, additional
fIelds were needed; they are utilizing all of the space
available. Kelly stated that a wetland adjoins the property but
adjustments to the'original plan avoids new wetland Impacts.
Based on the findings in the permIt review, it was recommended to
approve the permIt pendIng the stipUlation that no fIll is
involved with InstallIng the fence. It was noted that no erosIon
Control escrow was needed because It is a pUblIC project. MotIon
to approve the permIt as stIPulated was mOved by WillIams,
r'
Page 4. COon Creek WaterShed District _ August 24, 1992
seconded by Richmond. Motion carried with four yeas (Hemmes,
Hentges, Richmond and Williams) and no nays. Boyum was absent for
the vote.
11. Eagle Trail Crooked Lake Elementary SChoOl (PAN 92-50): r.slly
preSented the permit review. The purpose of this prOJect is an
after-the-fact permit request for a nature/interpretIve trail for
environmental education in Andover. It was noted that this
project was already completed and that the project is within the
maintenance easement for ditCh 57. There was diScussion about
maintenance of the project. It was suggested that the Boy Scout
group take care of it, and also that the school PTA be contacted
to see if a parent's group would be interested in maintainIng
it--especially SInce the school science classes use the area. The
Worst case scenarIo is that the area would revert back to nature.
Hemmes suggested that we use a DistrIct Cooperator agreement with
the School on this. RiChmond recommended that staff send a-letter
to the School acmlnistration explaining the after-the-fact permit
and that the District would like to work in cooperatIon with them
on any future dItCh-cleaning Work. In addition, the SChool
administrators should be aware not to plant, fill or do any
permanent structures within the maintenance easement in the
future. Based on the findings in the permit review, it was
recommended to approve the permit. Motion to approve the permit
and direct staff to send the specified letter was moved by
Williams, seconded by RiChmond. Motion Carried with fIve yeas
(BOyum, Memmes, Hentges, RiChmond and Williams) and no nays.
DiScussion Items
12. Creekview Pond Seeding and MUlChing: r.elly preSented the item
review. A contractor was needed for this project. Five
contractors were contacted for bids. The low bidder was Ray
Jordan & Sons. There was diScussion about the District savIng at
least 10~ on this project since the District is Serving as the
general contractor and working directly with a SUb-contractor.
r.elly noted that this project would be fInanced out of the
project funds remainIng from various 1992 Projects. MotIon to
direct staff to hire Ray Jordan & Sons to seed and mulch the
Creekview Pond was mOved by RIChmond, seconded by BOyum. Motion
carried with five yeas (Soyum, Hemmes, Hentges, RIChmond and
Williams) and no nays.
13. Park Construction Issue: r.elly presented the item reVIew.
There was dIscussion about the Board's responsIbility to the
taxpayers SInce any funds paId to Park--above and beYOnd the
contract price--could be Spent on other projects. UlrIch noted
that the DIstrict needs more InformatIon on how Park fIgUred out
Quantities of blaCk dIrt and sand. Staff was directed to advise
Park that the DistrIct doesn't see the merit of their claIm; they
need to SUbstantiate It. No action was needed on this item.
14. BUdget UPdate: r.elly preSented the item review. Me Stated
that the AdmInIstratIve Fund Project Balance was at $11,500 and
if reimbursement of grant IS factored in the bUdget, then the
DIstrict IS under bUdget by apprOXimately $25,192; thIS is enough
money to do the Plnger's Plaza prOject, start the LOwer COon
Creek ProJect and keep a ContIngency for unantIcIpated work in
the District. r.elly also noted that the State AUdItor had
recommended that the DistrIct have a higher fund balance. r.elly
also gave detaIls on the sUbwaterShed hearIng process and the
Anoka ConservatIon District Cost-Share grants. There was
dISCUSSion about ditch 39 and what the COurse of action ShOUld be
on thIS prOJect. Also dIscussed was the 509 rules and amendments.
ConcernIng the 1993 DIstrIct bUdget, there was dISCUSSIon about
the bUdget levy increase being at 3\ or 3.5\. Based on the ISsues
and concerns. It was recommended that staff be dIrected to
recalculate the prOJect bUdget and factor in the grants. A
---
--
l . . I
Page 5. Coon Creek WaterShed DistrIct _ August 2~, 1992
motion was made to do ditch 57 instead of ditch 39, presuming
that funds are available. Moved by RIchmond, seconded by
Williams. Motion carried with four yeas (Hemmes, Hentges,
RiChmond and WIllIams) and one nay (Boyum).
Informational Items
15. CURA: Kelly noted that a case-study analysis would be done on
Ditch 41 by a graduate student paId by the UH Center for Urban
and RegIonal Affairs and BWSR; he will be office at the Coon
Creek Watershed District Office part of the study. The stUdy wIll
evaluate different funding methods for water management prOJects.
No action was needed on this item.
16. StUdent Intern: Kelly preSented this item and said that a
Blaine hIgh school student e~pressed a desire for an internShip
with the District. Kelly prOPOsed that the Intern help complete
the DistrIct's wetlands inventory. He would work about 10 hours
per week during thIS school year. ~elly recommended that the
student be hired at mInImum wage, USIng District funds deSIgnated
for wetlands inventory. MotIon to hIre thIS student was moved by
WillIams, seconded by Boyum. Hotlon carried with fIve yeas
(SOyum, Hemmes, Hentges, RIChmond and WillIams) and no nays.
17. Wedgewood Develooment: RIChmond e~pressed a Concern about
ponding in thIs Andover prOJect beIng bUI It by ShamrOCk
~evelopers. She told the Board of Managers about the POndlng
SItuatIon WIth a Shamrock development In COon RaOlds--ln t~e
lower Rum RIVer Watershed DIstrIct. Staff was dIrected to Contact
Coon Raolds CIty staff concernIng POnClng maIntenance
resoonslbllltleS. No actIon was needed On thIS Item.
New Business
There was no new bUSIness.
The meet'ng adJOurned at 9:59 p.m. on a motIon by P.lc~mord,
seConded by WIllIams. Motion carrIed WIth fIve yeas (Soyum,
Hemmes, Hentges, RIChmond and WIllIams! and no nars.
RegInald A. Hemmes. PreSIdent
----- -
DATE: Se tember 15, 1992
-- ~ -----
Park and Recreation CommisSion Hinutes _ ^u ust 20, 1992
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Ordinance No. 101
LOwer Rum River WMO Information
Tree CommisSion Hinutes _ ^u ust 31, 1992
Re Ular Cit Council Hinutes _ Se tember " 1992
Park and Recreation Commission Hinutes _ Se tember 3, 1992
Au ust BUildin
Safet Committee Minutes - Au ust 20, 1992
S ecial Cit Council Minutes - Au ust 24, 1992
S ecial Cit Council Minutes - Au ust 25, 1992
Plannin and Zonin Commission Minutes - Au ust 25, 1992
Timber Meadows Sketch Plan
Echo Rid e Sketch Plan
Schedule of Bills
THANK YOU.
PLE^SE ^DDRESS THESE ITEHS ^T THIS HEETING OR PUT THEH ON THE NEX"
AGENDA.
1685 CROSSTOWN .OULEv ARD N. W. · ANOOVER, M'NNESOT A 55304 . '61 'I 755-5100
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIESTO'~
FROM: _ _
DATE: _
MaYor & City Council
--------
---------
Departments
David Almqren
September 3, 1992
REFERENCE. 'VGV,> 19" MONTHLv "VnOtNG RepORT
t horoby ""bmi, 'he fOlloWing repor, of 'he ""itding Oepar"en, for
the Month of August 1992:
~
38 Residential (30 Sewer/8 Septic)
1 Addition
5 Garages
2 ChimneY/Stove/FirePlace
1 Structural Change
24 PorChes/Decks
-l Other
72
~
72 BUilding Permits
2 CUrb Cut
42 Heating Permits
1 Heating Repair
31 Hook Up (Sewer)
45 Plumbing Permits
9 Plumbing Repair
10 Septic Permits
5 Septic Repair
30 Water Meter Permit
39 Certificates of OCCupancy
7 Contractor.s License
35 License Verification Fee
20 Health Authority Form
31 Sewer Administration Fee
31 SAC Retainage Fee
3 Reinspection Fee
To", ""i1d'og Depar"en, tn'o.e"'"g"", 199,
Total BUilding Department Income-_YTD 1992
Total Valuation-_AugUst 1992
Total Valuation__YTD 1992
Total Number of HOUses YTD 1992 _ 314
Total Number of HOUses YTD 1991 _
DA/jp
APPROXIMATE VALUATION
$ 3,759,000.00
9,400.00
36,712.00
2,500.00
100.00
67,915.00
~
$ 3,875,727.00
~
26,231.90
10.00
2,084.31
15.00
1,125.00
4,828.57
186.25
385.00
175.00
1,500.00
156.00
175.00
175.00
100.00
465.00
217.00
~
37,919.03
302,648.57
3,875,727.00
32,464,257.00
LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
MEETING NOTI~
A. Call to Order
AGENDA
B. Roll Call
C. Minutes of Previous Meetings
D. Treasurer's Report
E. PaYment of Bills
F. Report of Officers
G. Consideration Of Communications
1. DNR concerns with two unauthorized Ramsey projects
2. Miscellaneous corresPondence
H. Pending Projects/Permit Reviews
1. Second Quarter Reports - COon Rapids and Ramsey
2. UPdate On Ramsey Project #92-15
3. Regency WOOds Apartment _ WMO APPlication #92-5
4. Tower Pond - WMo APPlication #92-5
I. Old Business
1. Water Quality RecordS/Maintenance _ JaukOWski
2. AndoVer's Comprehensive Storm Drainage PIau
J.
New
1.
2.
3.
BUsiness
Engineering Contract
Joint POwers Agreement
UPdated BYlaws
Discussions
K. Adjournment
ATTENDANCE:
WMO Members
REMINDER' THE BILL REVIEW COMMITTEE WILL !1EET PRIOR TO THE
REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING
C;G \.J ~q2
q"a
-------
LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
AUGUST 20, 1992
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Jim Schrantz called the meeting to order at 8,30
a.m. in the Canmittee Room of Anoka City Hall.
ROLL CALL
Members present were Jim Schrantz, Steve Jankowski. and John
Weaver.
Also present were -Deputy Treasurer
alternate Bruce Perry, Anoka alternate
Rapids alternate Bill Ottensman.
Jim
Ray
Knutson, Andover
SChUltz, and Coon
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
Motion was made by Schrantz. seCOnded by Jankowski, to
APPROVE THE JULY 15, 1992, MEETING MINUTES AS PRINTED.
3 ayes (Schrantz, Jankowski, SChUltz) _ 0 naYes _ 1 present
(Ottensman). Motion carried.
Motion was made by Jankowski. seConded hy SChrantz, to
APPROVE THE JUNE 25, 1992, MEETING MINUTES AS PRINTED.
.
3 ayes - 0 naYes - 1 present (Ottensman). Motion carried.
MOtion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Weaver, to APPROVE
THE JULY 22, 1992, MEETING MINUTES AS PRINTED.
3 ayes - 0 nayes - 1 present (Ottensman). Motion carried.
TREAsURER'S REPORT
Knntson presented the Treasurer's Report for the periOd
ending JUly 31, 1992, indicating a money market checking
aCCOunt balance of $lO.OO; an interest bearing savings
aCCOunt balance of $5,494.53 less the permit aCCOunt balance
of $2,577.00, for a total savings aCCOunt balance of
$2,817.63, and a certificate of deposit balance of
$12,OOO.00; for a total current balance of $17,504.53.
Knntson noted the payment of seCond half memberShip dnes by
the Cities of Andover and Ramsey.
Knutson reminded the board some time agO it approved payment
of same Barr Engineering bills; checks for these payments
---
--.
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
August 20, 1992
Page 2
---- ---
have been cut. However, at the direction of this board,
those checks have not been mailed out, awaiting the receipt
of revised, detailed billings from Barr Engineering. Knutson
indicated Barr Engineering has not been paid since December
l, 1991. These unpaid bills total approximately $1,669.50.
He reported it was the recommendation of the Bill Review
Committee to show these outstanding payments On the budget
report in order to get a proper reflection of cash on hand.
This will be done on the report received next month.
Upon further discussion of the non-detailed Barr Engineering
bills being held, Knutson stated that before November 30,
1991, Barr Engineering was providing sufficiently detailed
bills. However, for Some reason that practice was changed.
Weaver asked that the minutes reflect that the reason these
Barr Engineering bills have not been paid is that these
billings do not differentiate between permit reviews and Barr
Engineering's general billings to this organization for time.
Knutson also prOVided the board with a Summary of Permit Fee
Applications for the period ending June 30, 1992, totaling
$2,677 .00.
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Weaver, to ACCEPT
THE TREASURER'S REPORT AS PRESENTED.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
PAYMENT OF BILLS
KnutSon presented a bill from Barr Engineering for the period
May 21 through June 27, 1992, in the amount of $520.50; again
without providing the proper, requested, itemized breakdown
of costs.
Schrantz recalled the discussions at the June 25, 1992,
special meeting with Barr Engineering representatives John
Dickson and Dean Skallrnan whereby Mr. Dickson indicated he
could easily prOVide the requested information on a worksheet
which Barr Engineering would put together. Knutson indicated
he would call Skallman and remind him. Weaver asked Knutson
to remind Skallman that the LRRWMO is waiting to pay these
previously submitted bills.
Knutson further explained that there are permit expenses in
these billings from Barr Engineering that have to corne out of
the application fees. Some of these projects are SOon to be
finished and will require a return of the unused funds.
Therefore, it is mandatory that those unpaid bills from Barr
Engineering be properly delineated in the very near future.
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
August 20, 1992
Page 3
Knutson also presented bills from the City of Anoka for
secretarial services, postage, supplies, etc. for the months
of May, June, and July 1992, in the amounts of $307.55,
$193.30, and $389.3l, respectively, for a total of $890.16.
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Weaver, to AUTHO-
RIZE PAYMENT OF THE CITY OF ANOKA BILLS TOTALING $890.l6 AS
WELL AS THE BARR ENGINEERING BILL FOR $520.50, SUBJECT TO THE
ENGINEERING FIRM'S PROVISION OF AN ITEMIZATION OF THIS
BILLING, SEPARATING ITS PERMIT PROJECTS COSTS FROM THE
GENERAL ENGINEERING COSTS.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Knutson prOVided the board with a draft Member Operating Cost
Assessment chart for 1993. These numbers should represent
the total valuation without deducting tax increment
financing. He noted this chart does not provide the
valuation for the City of Coon Rapids at this point. Knutson
stated once the City of Coon Rapids comes up with its
evaluation, this chart can be updated. This merely provides
the board,with a close estimate for 1993.
REPORT OF OFFICERS
Ottensman indicated Erickson is no longer employed by the
City of Coon Rapids. Therefore, he, as the city's alternate,
will represent the City of Coon Rapids on this board until
such time as someone else is hired.
CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNICATIONS
Schrantz noted the receipt of the Summer 1992
Conservation Mentor, the Summer 1992 Urban
notice for a September 17-18, 1992, "Clean
conference on nonpoint SOurce pollution, to be
Northwest Inn in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota.
edition of The
Update, and a
Water 2000"
held at the
PENDING PROJECTS/PERMIT REVIEWS
Second Quarter Reports - Andover, Coon Rapids, Ramsey
Schrantz provided
development report,
listed projects were
Andover's second
dated August 19,
briefly discussed.
quarter
199 2 .
1992 project
Some of the
Ottensman verbally
during the second
not yet available.
indicated Coon Rapids had no activity
quarter. Jankowski stated his report is
Both representatives from the Cities of
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
August 20, 1992
Page 4
Coon Rapids and Ramsey will provide a written second quarter
project report at the September meeting.
Uodate on Ramsey project #92-l5
Upon discussion of Ramsey project #92-l5, Department of
Natural Resource (DNR) permits #92-6237 and #92-6238, a Wood
Pond development, a June l5, 1992, communication from
Skallman, the LRRWMO Consulting Engineer, was noted which
indicated the velocity of the discharge does not meet LRRWMO
requirements; and the sedimentation pond is not designed to
LRRWMO requirements. Jankowski indicated he would have to
discuss this with Pete Raatikka, Hakanson Anderson
Engineering, and find out if the necessary changes have been
made to the plan.
Schrantz directed that this agenda item be held OVer to the
September meeting.
DNR Permit #92-6258, City of Ramse~
Jankowski explained the Ramsey proposed project, identified
as DNR Permit #92-6258, invOlving the placement of approxi-
mately 6,000 square feet of fill along the edge of the
wetland for the construction of l50th Lane N.W. Mitigation
excavation is proposed at 10,000 square feet. Jankowski
indicated this project will facilitate a connection between
two segments of roadway systems. This wetland is a protected
wetland, although not a Class A or B water.
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Ottensman, to
INDICATE TO THE DNR LRRWMO APPROVAL OF DNR PERMIT #92-6258,
CONTINGENT ON MITIGATION BEING REQUIRED.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
At this time, Chairman SChrantz made the prearranged tele-
phone call to the Consulting Engineer and diSCUSsed several
issues, among them the need to better detail Barr
Engineering's bills, about which Knutson will be contacting
him; the LRRWMO's desire to pay the bills being held since
the first of this year which first needs to be itemized; the
request that Skallman send his communications to the LRRWMO
office, not to Chairman SChrantz, whenever Possible to allow
the Administrative Secretary to distribute copies to the
board members for their review prior to the meetings; and the
DNR permit applications #92-6258 and #93-6019, for which the
board received no comment from its ConsUlting Engineer.
Skallman reportedly indicated to SChrantz he has no record of
ever receiving information on thOse two DNR permit
applications.
---
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
August 20, 1992
Page 5
DNR Permit #93-6019, Dale and Violet Klungness
The board discussed DNR permit application #93-6019 submitted
by Dale and Violet Klungness, Anoka, requesting permission to
construct forty-six feet of timber retaining wall along the
Rum River. Railroad ties will be used for the wall in the
water. The total river frontage owned is sixty feet. The
purpose of the wall is for erosion control and access.
Weaver suggested this board query of the DNR whether this
request complies with the restrictions applicable in the Wild
and Scenic River Act with regard to the access, particularly
the width of the access.
Jankowski felt comfortable sUpporting this application if it
will assist with erosion control.
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Ottensman, to
RECOMMEND LRRWMO APPROVAL OF DNR PERMIT APPLICATION #93-60l9,
WITH THE REQUEST THAT THIS PROJECT COMPLY WITH THE RESTRIC-
TIONS APPLICABLE TO THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT WITH
REGARD TO THE ACCESS, PARTICULARLY THE WIDTH, NOTING THAT THE
LRRWMO SUPPORTS THIS CONCERTED EFFORT TO REDUCE/CONI'ROL
EROSION IN THIS AREA.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
DNR Permit #93-6025
SChrantz presented DNR Permit Application #93-6025 which had
been sent to his office in Andover. The application was a
request by the City of Ramsey for permission to construct a
storm sewer outlet into Wetland #2-658W. Runoff will be from
the "Sunny Ponds" development. Dewatering for utility
installation will also take place on th.is project site during
September and OctOber. Four Pumps at 450 gallon per minute
will appropriate forty million gallons with disCharge to
wetland #2-658W.
Comments received from the LRRWMO ConsUlting Engineer, dated
August 17, 1992, indicated the project is in conformance with
LRRWMO requirements.
Jankowski explained this application involves a new develop-
ment of fifty-two lots, initially. DisCharge will be at the
location indicated. He stated there will be swamp areas for
the sedimentation. There will be no basins as would be
required for Class A or B waters. The City of Ramsey has
created sump areas at the point of disCharge, but will not be
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
August 20, 1992
Page 6
constructed in accordance to standards of Class A and B
waters.
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Weaver, to INDICATE
TO THE DNR LRRWMO APPROVAL OF DNR APPLICATION #93-6025.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Anoka Dam PrOject
Schultz presented the proposed plans for the replacement of
the retaining wall on the east bank of the Rum River between
the Main Street bridge and the Anoka Dam, noting this work is
necessary due to structural failure. The slope of the
proposed rip rap was discussed. Schrantz cautioned against
erosion OCcurring under the rip rap.
Weaver explained that the City of Anoka's first preference
was to replace the retaining wall, but the cost was
prohibitive. Schultz added that the tiebacks on the eXisting
Pilings are all eroding away. The existing sheet Pilings
will be cut off below the rip rap.
Schrantz Suggested
subject to positive
Engineer.
this board
comments
could approve this project
from the LRRWMO Consulting
Motion was made by Ottensman, seconded by JankoWSki, to
APPROVE THE ANORA DAM PROJECT AS PROPOSED, SUBJECT TO POSI-
TIVE COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM THE LRRWMO CONSULTING ENGINEER.
Schultz queried whether the LRRWMO would authorize the
secretary to make that immediate comment to the DNR when the
DNR permit is received. Schrantz stated if there becomes a
big problem, the City of Anoka may Contact the other board
members to request a special meeting to Consider the permit
application further.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS
Rosella Sonsteby Wetland Issue
Schrantz updated the board on the Rosella Sonsteby wetland
mitigation issue involving lots one, two, and three on
Woodbine Street in Andover. He reported the Technical Review
Canmittee, consisting of the Board of Water and Soil
Resources (BWSR) representative Bruce Sandstrom, Anoka County
Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) representative
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
August 20, 1992
Page 7
Chris Lord, and the local governmental unit representatives
from the LRRWMO Dean Skallman, along with Schrantz, has met
to consider this wetland mitigation issue. Schrantz
indicated it was the determination of the Technical Review
Committee that Ms. Sonsteby will be exempt from wetland
mitigation requirements on lots one, two, and three; but that
on the fourth lot she will have to mitigate the wetland. Ms.
Sonsteby will be allowed to move all the wetland soils out
and build on the three lots without mitigation. Upon
considerable review, the committee is satisfied that Ms.
Sonsteby, in this case, qualified for this exemption.
Skallman's August 17, 1992, letter to Schrantz addressing
this matter on behalf of the Technical Review Committee was
referenced.
Schrantz reviewed the billing procedure for these wetland
mitigation review projects, cOnfirming that the LRRWMO will
not COver the cost for any of these projects. The bills will
be passed through the LRRWMO to the city, and, if the city so
chooses, back to the applicant.
Motion was made by Schrantz, seconded by Weaver, to APPROVE
THE AUGUST 17, 1992, TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE'S REPORT AND
INDICATE THE LRRWMO WILL ALLOW ROSELLA SONSTEBY TO PROCEED
WITH THE THREE LOTS INDICATED, AND THAT SHE DOES NOT HAVE TO
MITIGATE ON THOSE THREE LOTS.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
The Administrative Secretary was directed to compose a letter
to Ms. Sonsteby under the Chairman's signature informing her
of the board's decision in this matter.
Water Quality Records/Maintenance _ Jankowski
Jankowski
directed
agenda.
did not have this information available.
that this item be carried over to the
Schrantz
September
Andover's Storm Drainage Plan
Schrantz indicated Andover has received comments back on
Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan. Updated information
be provided at the September meeting.
its
will
NEW BUSINESS
Engineering Contract Discussions
Schrantz reported that LRRWMO attorney Curtis Pearson has
indicated the proposed Consulting Engineering contract for
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
August 20, 1992
Page 8
this board should be quite simple, and the board itself can
prObably put together such an agreement. He stated the,
board's next step is to advertise for Consultants according
to state statute requirements. Schrantz added the Contract
should include the Consultant Engineer's review of DNR and
LRRWMO permit applications.
SChrantz indicated this board might want to Consider request-
ing a lump sum charge for coming to these regular ~~nthly
meetings for the length of each meeting.
Schrantz stated this board will want its ConsUlting Engineer
to attend these wetland Technical Review Committee reviews
also. He added each individual who uses Our Consulting
Engineer on these matters will pay for the cost. Schultz
queried why a permit did not come through for the Sonsteby
project with the $500 application fee submitted. Schrantz
noted that this procedure is young; we might decide to handle
things differently as we proceed.
The board membe rs
the LRRWMO will
services. _
concurred that according to state statute
have to invite proposals for engineering
Joint Powers Agreement Discussions
Weaver queried whether the LRRWMO must update its Joint
Powers Agreement. Schrantz responded that Our attorney has
advised this board to do so according to state statute. It
was noted that $3,500 has been budgeted for legal fees to
update the Joint Powers Agreement. SChrantz reported the
attorney has indicated he could prObably do the work for
approximately $2,000 to $2,500.
Weaver noted that every time the state legislature meets
changes are made which affect the Joint Powers Agreement. He
queried whether other WMO's have upgraded their documents to
comply with recent legiSlation. Schrantz felt it should not
make any difference if other's have updated theirs or not.
Weaver added he is not terribly excited about have the LRRWMO
Joint Powers Agreement updated at this time.
Motion was made by Weaver, seconded by Ottensman, to TABLE
FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF UPDATING THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
AT THIS TIME. '
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
August 20, 1992
Page 9
LRRWMO BYLAWS - UPDATES AND AMENDMENTS
The Administrative Secretary indicated review of the LRRWMO
bylaws have shown the document to be in a somewhat rough
draft form. She requested the board's permission to be
allowed to update the language and generally clean up the
document while retyping to insert the amendment regarding the
recent change of meeting days, from every third Wednesday of
each month to every third Thursday of each month.
Schrantz directed the Administrative Secretary to go ahead
and make the proposed changes and submit a draft document for
the board's consideration at a future meeting.
Upon further discussion of
agreed that each city's
assignee, shall publish
newsletter.
the meeting day change, it was
representative member, or his
this change in his respective
ADJOURNMENT
Motion was made by Weaver, seconded by SChrantz, to ADJOURN
THE MEETING.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Time of adjournment: 10:40 a.m.
RespectfUlly submitted,
fl~Yl~
Mava Mikkonen
Administrative Secretary
Permi t No. c;;',"C"_C
Date Received u_-:,._~z.
LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
ANDOVER - ANOKA - COON RAPIDS - RAMSEY
Permit Application tor Construction
A $500 escrow deposit shall accompany
acknowledges tami I iarity with LRRWMO
ordinances. Permits are to be processed
application, and approval ot the city
located.
this permit. Applicant
rules, regulations, and
with the site plan. plat
in which the project is
OWNER Tiller Corporation "i'llerJr
10633-89th Ave. North
ADDRESSMa Ie Grove. MN 55369
(612)425-4191
APPLI CANT Tiller Corporation PHONE (612)425-4191
10633-89th Ave. North
A~ESS Maple Grove,MN 55369
& ~f1zrd-.~ (f~:.i2~ DATE 7/13/92
. SIgnature ot appl i'cant
Gary B. Sauer, President
Note: The applicant assumes all responsibility tor compliance with
permit conditions. J
PROJECT NAME Tower Pond
ADDRESS/LOCATION Industrial Avenue & Thurston Avenue. Anoka. Minnesota
PROJECT DESCR I PT ION/PURPOSE SinJl:le family tot subdivision
PROJECT SUBMITTALS
___GRADING PLAN: including existing and proposed contours and
boundaries of all wetlands and surface waters.
---STORM SEWER/DRAINAGE PLAN:
features and
features.
including all permanent drainage
all permanent water quality
___EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Including al I temporary measures proposed
to maintain aI' sediment on site.
START OF PROJECT
9-92
ESTIUATED END OF PROJECT 6-93
~..._.........___.-~_.-....O
._.._ _ .._ _.. .. u
BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO.
10633 89TH AVENUE NORTH
MAPLE GROVE MN 55369-4056
VENDOR:
CHECK NO.:
L''f:'.2JH INnVA~lfE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT R~;!,I).~T!S.W BALANCE
Watershed AppLtcatton Escrow- 500.00
I
:
I
I
!
!
PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING (MCM XENIX 1.87)
" .
, BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO.
FIRST BANK WILLMAR
WILLMAR. MN 56201
75-1590-919
24936
~
CHECK NO.
24936
." ' 10633 . 89TH AVENUE NORTH
,:--:"", MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369-4056
. . . . .
. ._" MO, :. -~ .:: ~ .=. :'.-
__ ":" .:.~._.:~~~~/~~_i;~~;.'>o:~~~' .~. :'.:.~';.'
AMOUNT
DATE
, .' PAv."Fi.ve hundred and no/100.**
$500.00
07-14-92
TO THE
ORDER
OF
Lower Rum Ri.ver Watershed
Management Organi.zati.on
BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO.
COMPANY IS AN EOUAL OPPORTUNItY EMPLOYER
#~~
.
"
H
~
.
U
UTHORIZED SIGNATURE
II" 0 2t, q :i b II" I: 0 q ~ q ~ 5 q 0 0 I: li"t, a ~ ~ q 0 0 ~ 2011"
"
IIIC..... ----.
-.
--
--
.. -. -- J
Arr1i coJloY) 7ft4,mitfztl, M- ot-RAOl monn,
Pennit No.
..--/ ~ - .-.,
LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
Date Received 9-r: //~:::
ANDOVER - ANOKA - COON RAPms - RAMsEY
Penni!: APPlication for Construction
A $500 escrow deposit shall accompany this pennit. Applicant
acknowledges familiarity with LRRWMO rules, regulations, and
ordinances. Pennits are to be processed with the site plan,
plat application, and approval of the city in which the
project is located.
OWNER
SCHMITZ KORNOVICH INC
PHONE 252-4015
ADDRESS 225 NORTH BENTON DRIVE, STE 2E, SAUK RAPIDS MN 56379
APPLICANT LONNIE KORNOVICH
PHONE 252-4015
ADDRESS 225 NORTH BENTON DRIVE, STE 2E, SAUK RAPIDS MN 56379
DATE AUGUST 24, 1992
Signature of Applicant
NOTE: The applicant assumes all responsibility for
compliance with pennit conditions.
PROJECT NAME
ADDRESS/LOCATION CUTTERS GROVE AVENUE
REGENCY WOODS APARTMENT
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE
90 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT
PROJECT SUBMITTALS
x
GRADING PLAN: InClUding
contours and boundaries of
waters.
existing and proposed
all wetlands and surface
x
STOID1 SEWER/DRAINAGE PLAN:
drainage features and all
features.
InClUding
permanent
all permanent
water quality
X EROSION CONI'ROL PLAN: Including all temporary
measures proposed to maintain all sediment on site.
START OF PROJECT MARCH '93 ESTIMATED END OF PR0JECT DECEMBER '93
I"-
to
I"-
M
~
ti
z
-
:%:
o
:;
o
z
a:
o
~
N
...
:E
:c
o
en
-.
I"-
to
I"-
M
~
m
en'"
...0
..J _ ~
cCen'
u<,o
z!&laa
~~lOiij
u:cnZM
)00::;0
t-Z ...
i:ll(cu\
;)~;)...
C.lzO
w_...J
",~(,J
~..:
men
..,
ell
.<::
'"
\.<
ell
...
<ll
~
ti
Zw
-'"
- w ..
:c!:: \:;
o :> on U).
_fJ)?""r.t)
> .~ Z
Oa:N~
zo:f;l""
a:zNui
00;;; 9
~!Z~~
N w l>. a:
III ~
.... :>
- Z <
::E on rn
:C~
o
en
. .:a_--.a
--
..
..
..
n
-
..
..
..
..
..
..
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
M
'"
~
CX)
o
o
o
-'
-
o
s::
..,
s::
<ll
..,
ell
\.<
..,
s::
;:l
.<::
ell
~
rz.
Wa:
>:i5'"
tE~5~
oS
.>ol
o
~
.....
o
>-
...
....
u
--
~
~I
a'
...1
rui
al
01
01
~i
al
t'-i
[]"'\
[]"'.
.-'
..
-
a
,.."
...
a
t'-i
[]'"
...
~ j'
..
- ,
~
1
01
~ J
t'-
cll
t'-
,.."
...
J
&.. ----.!
)-
r--
'iL~
- ------~
'--- - ~ - - 1St
- -----
r._--._ .-. ~ __ ..-. ~
". -- -- ----
Minnespta
Board 0 .1
Water & 501
Resources
~~-,~~
Soulhbridge Office Building
155 Soulh Wdbdshd 51.. 5uite 104
SI. Pdul. Minnesold 55107
(612) 296.)767
FdX (612) 297,5615
RegiondlOllices
Nonl-.t ~ion
n06 Poul BUny.ln Drive. NE
Bemidji. MN 56601
218-l5S-3963
NortheoSl ~ion
394 Sou,h uke Avenue
Room 403
Dulu,h, MN 55802
218-n~752
West Cen,,,,r Region
503 Woshinglon S'reet
B"'inerd. MN 56-101
21~2~2604
Sou,h Cent",1 ~ion
Sox 756
New Ulm. MN 56073
507.359-6074
Southeut ~ion
f,iedell Bldg,. Room 100
1200 S. Bro.Jdwoy
Rochest... MN 55904
507-2SS-;458
Sour'-<r ~ion
Sox 267
1400 E. Lj<ln Streel
Monholl. MN 5625S
507.537-6060
EoSl Cen,,,,' Region
Sou,hb,idge Office Building
155 Sou,h W.bosho St, Sui'e 104
Sl. ""ul. MN 55107
612.296-3767
An Eq...1
OPllOflUniry Employer
August 7, 1992
TO: Minnesota Extension Service agents, soil
and water conservation district staff,
watershed district staff, watershed
management organization staff, and county
water planning staff
We're pleased to announce that, as of August 3, the
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) and
the Minnesota Extension Service (MES) began a new
partnership to reach a common goal: providing local
government with the tools it needs to educate others
about the wise use of natural resources. This
partnership is a natural outgrowth of the shared
educational mandates of both the BWSR and the MES.
The focal point of this partnership is a "pilot" joint
BWSR-MES position of Water Resources Education
Coordinator, located in the BWSR Duluth office. Barb
Liukkonen, whom many of you know from her work with
local governments and others in the Red River Valley,
has accepted the position.
since this is a pilot, it was decided to limit Barb's
focus to the northern half of the state, which we
defined as extending northward from an east-west line
fonned by Chisago, Isanti, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Todd,
Pope, stevens and Traverse. (It also includes those
counties.) This coincides with MES clusters 1, 23, 5,
6, 7, 8 and 9, and the BWSR northern region. If the
project is successful, we hope to expand it next year
with additional position(s) serving the south and/or
metro area.
The basic objective of Barb's position will be to work
with local governments (counties, watershed districts,
and soil and water conservation districts) within that
region to help them' meet their educational needs. Some
examples of situations in which local governments
might seek Barb's assistance:
-An SWCD in a county with a severe erosion
problem needs assistance in developing a
presentation for the county board to help
convince county commissioners that an
erosion control ordinance might be
beneficial.
-SWCDs and the corresponding MES cluster would
like to design and carry out a program to
achieve the educational goals in the county
water plans.
-A group of watershed districts need help
developing material to present to landowners
regarding shoreline BMPs--they want a video and
some handouts.
-A county feels that it's not fulfilling the "education"
component of its water plan and wants to work out a program
with the county school districts.
As you can see, the projects can be targeted at a wide variety of
audiences, and can involve one or more local units of government.
since Barb obviously will not be able to work (either collectively
or individually) with all local governments in the northern region,
she is hoping to work on projects that involve cooperation between
more than one type of local unit; also, projects that can be
repeated or applied in other areas of the state are preferable to
those with a more limited scope.
Barb will be looking to MES and BWSR staff for guidance regarding
possible projects, sUbjects, and local units. After projects are
chosen, BWSR and MES personnel will continue to provide leadership
and input to ensure that the projects develop on track with the
original intentions and in the most useful and appropriate.
direction possible. If you have an idea that seems to be in line
with the ~bove examples, or some type of educational project that
you believe is important but haven't had time to do, or know that
some local units in your area are interested in working on a
particular educational effort, contact Barb at the Duluth BWSR
office (218-723-4752).
since it's anticipated that many of the projects may involve
development of materials, the position does have a limited printing
budget. In addition, assistance with writing, layout and design of
materials will be provided through both MES and the BWSR.
The original concept for this position resulted from a survey sent
to local units of government more than a year ago. Based on that,
the BWSR Education ,committee, composed of representatives from
counties, soil and water conservation districts, watershed
districts, and MES, hammered out an education strategy and fleshed
out the details of the position.
This formalization of what has been an excellent working
relationship between the BWSR and MES is a natural extension of the
commitment to education that both organizations share. We're
confident that this partnership will allow both MES and BWSR to
make better use of our staffing and connection networks throughout
the state, as well as providing each with the opportunity to take
advantage of the other's areas of strength.
~~~~r~~~'
water quality coordinator
MES
sincerely,
Ron Harnack
executive
director,
BWSR
ceCe6ratiolZ -<
.('Il~1' ~
c,'" "20
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Celebrating our 25th anniversary and the 20th anniversary of the Clean Water Act
To All Interested Parties:
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has announced the 5th application
cycle for the Clean Yater Partnership (CYP) program. Applications will be
accepted for CYP grants from July 6, 1992, through October 29, 1992.
.
The purpose of the CYP program is to improve water quality by providing
financial and technical assistance to local units of government. Assistance is
provided for the undertaking of nonpoint source pollution control projects that
address nonpoint source pollution of lakes, streams, and aquifers.
Projects can be of two types: development of a diagnostic study and
implementation plan or project implementation. The grants are for a maximum of
fifty percent (50%) of the eligible cost of the project. Grants will be
awarded based on priority ranking of the project proposals. Ranking is based
on criteria set forth in Minn. Rules pt. 7076.0170.
If you are interested in applying for this program, the CYP grant application
and application instructions may be obtained by calling (612) 296-7253. Other
guidance materials addressing hydrologic modeling, water quality monitoring,
and final reporting are also available.
MPCA staff will be available at the following times and locations to answer
questions and assist applicants in completing their applications:
1) September 24, 1992
12:30 - 4:00 P.M.
Mankato Regional Library
100 East Main Street
Mankato, Minnesota
2) September 29, 1992
12:30 - 4:00 P.M.
MPCA, Lower Level
520 Lafayette Road
St. Paul, Minnesota
3) October I, 1992
12:30 - 4:00 P.M.
Brainerd Public Library
416 South Fourth Street
Brainerd, Minnesota
If you have any further questions, please call Celine Lyman of my staff at
(612) 296-8862.
Sincerely,
~~~~=,~
Nonpoint Source Section
Yater Quality Division
KS/CL:mbo
520 Lafayette Rd,; 51. Paul, MN 55155-3898: (612) 296-6300: Regional Offices: Duluth. Brainerd. Detroit Lakes. Marshall. Rochester
Equal Opportunity Employer. Ponted on Recycled Paper
~ STATE OF
!~][NJ~~@u~
'DEPARTMENT OF NATU'RAL RESOURCES
PHONE NO.
Cathy L. Brehm
Conservation Officer
6701 115 1/2 Avenue North
Champlin. MN 55316
427-1595
Lower Rum River Watershed Distrct
Jim Schrantz
2015 First Ave.North
Anoka, MN 55303
August 18, 1992
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
I understand you are the Local Government Unit Authority for
the city of Andover for the new Wetland Act passed in 1991.
I have investigated a location in that city where illegal
filling of a wetland covered by this act has taken place.
The location is the 2700 block of Constance Bvd. (Co.20) 1/2
mile east of Co. 9. on the north side of the road. This
appears to be the start of a driveway being put in to reach
a potential building site just north of the county ditch,
which has also been partially filled in.
I have not issued any cease and desist orders at this time,
partially because I am not sure just who is doing the work,
and no one was on site when I was there on Saturday August
15.
This may be something that could be resolved with a letter
from your watershed district first. and followed by a cease
and desist order if needed.
Please advise what further assistance you would like from me
regarding this case. Thank you in advance for your
assistance.
~L---
1
Cathy Brehm
Conservation Officer
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
~
~ STATE OF
(RlJ~(g~@U~
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
PHONE NO.
Cathy L. Brehm
Conservation Officer
6701 115 1/2 Avenue North
Champlin. MN 55316
427-1595
Lower Rum River Watershed Distrct
Jim Schrantz
2015 First Ave.North
Anoka, MN 55303
August 18, 1992
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
I understand you are the Local Government Unit Authority for
the city of Ramsey for the new Wetland Act passed in 1991.
I have received a complaint and investigated a location in
that city where illegal filling of a wetland covered by this
act has taken place.
The location is 17540 St. Francis Blvd, (Co. 47)Ramsey, MN
and has been filled in by the homeowners there, a cease and
desist was issued to them back in June, however it appears
they are still working in this wetland at this time. The
next step would appear to be for someone from your office to
visit the site and develop a restoration order for me to
issue.
I spoke with both you and the city of Ramsey regarding that
site earlier this summer. Someone from our office also spoke
with the homeowners personally but it seems there is still
some confusion on there part as to just what they are
allowed to do in that wetland.
If I can be of any assistance in this matter, please feel
free to contact me at the above address.
~s truly, I
V J.', /
-<j ~
Cathy Brehm
Conservation Officer
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
~ill
LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
-.c
.Jv
ANDOVER - ANOKA - COON RAPIDS - RAMSEY
2015 FIRST AVENUE, ANOKA, MN
55303
August 20, 1992,
Ms. Rosella Sonsteby
5151 14lst Ave. N.W.
Anoka, MN 55303
Dear Ms. Sonsteby:
The Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization, during
its monthly meeting today, discussed your recent activities
involving wetland mitigation requirements in relation to lots
one, two, and three on Woodbine Street in Andover. Upon
review of the information provided, the board unanimously
agreed to approve the enclosed Technical Review Committee's
report, dated August 17, 1992, from Dean Skallman, recommend-
ing the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization
allow you to proceed with the development of the three lots
in question, and that you are exempt from wetland mitigation
requirements, dictated by the 1991 Wetland Conservation
Action, on the three lots.
Thank you for your cooperation in settling this issue.
Sincerely,
c,
Schrantz
cc: Bruce Sandstrom
Chris Lord
Dean Skallman
LRRWMO Members
Enclosure
Barr
Engineering Company
8300 Norman Center Drive
Minneapolis. MN 55437.1025
Phone: (512) 832-2500
Fax: (512) 835-0185
August 17, 1992
Mr. Jim Schrantz
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard Northwest
Andover, Minnesota 55304
Re: Rosella Sonsteby's Lots on Woodbine Street in Andover
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
The Technical Review Committee, consisting of Bruce Sandstrom of the
Board of Water and Soil Resources, Chris Lord of the Soil and Water
Conservation District and Dean Skallman the Engineer for the Lower Rum River
Water Management Organization, have reviewed the above-referenced lots to
determine the requirements dictated by the Wetland Conservation act of 1991.
The following is a discussion of our findings.
Figure 1 shows the location of the lots in question and labels them 1-4.
Also included on this figure is a rough estimate of the extent of the
wetlands on the lots. Figure 2 shows the limits of Auditors Subdivision 82.
Chris Lord provided the field investigation to approximate the extent of
the wetlands. A letter was prepared describing the area. This field
investigation provided the committee with an understanding of the nature of
the area. A copy of the text of that letter is attached for informational
purposes. The committee met on the site on July 18, 1992 to review the area.
The Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 provided several exemptions from
the need to mitigate for the loss of wetlands. One of these exemptions is a
plat that has received preliminary approval within the five years before
August 1, 1991. The City of Andover initiated a process in 1989 to provide
platting of the Auditors Subdivision No. 82. As we discussed on the phone it
is the opinion of the legal council for the City of Andover that Auditors
Subdivision No. 82 went through the requirements of the City'S platting
process and received preliminary plat approval in the five year period
discussed above.
It is the opinion of this committee that the inclusion of lots I, 2 and
3 in the plating process means they are exempt from the wetland mitigation
requirements dictated by the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act. Lot 4 is not in
Auditors Subdivision 82 and is not exempt from the need to mitigate.
---
Mr. Jim Schrantz
August 17, 1992
Page 2
The COmmittee would recommend the wetland modifications be minimized and
ennoura.e the alteration of the lot be limited to thealn1m.. requiremeots 0'
the City of Andover.
Sincerely,
2)~V5~
DVS:dsd
Enclosure
c: Chris Lord
Bruce Sandstrom
A:TRC.LTR
Dean V. Skallman
LRRWMO Technical
Review COmmittee
....
143rd AVE
.
I-
m
w
z
CD
CI
o
o
~
1\-. \
".I'':''c.;.,
q
.--- ---
-
...:
m
w
~
<(
I-
Z
-
>
J
.r
/
(N)
Figure 1
, . .. .
/ ,&!/~'-;
~. ~/_..~"\
.:/,,,'" ~
1
Lr,
4':'4'6''p'J4-;Y:
., A.....l_.r '-.1:
..,
""""-- --
, ,-
/
./
,
, '
,
~
~
(/Ba:7)
~<t
~~Z
W
X
~
.i r.~
.
.'
~,
(/75'41
(1'<)
i l~
,-
t1~ ;...J~
(j.o) ;"'i
(I) : :~
I'
; t
(7'1)
~
..
;45TH
(~1) ,"
"&00) ~
&e}
Vb/c)
(51)
f&2q)
-- ~:--: tr' (10)..
(070)
.0
I~O
('1/)
(1060) ..'
(30)
(IO~C)
(29)
(:C:l,(i.}
w
Z 1"-
m ,_ (100'01
8 !-Z. (z~)
o ~r./44) I '30'.
:i: rt Z.CO) I ~OZ.O)
..J ..\~..'I."."",,:~ Z I c.;ni~':.:.
Jant4:c, G.o....ly. rl("ur~"f L..
~ \'\'nJ,"orn'S~
"~(IZ.OS) M ~ (p) ~
~DonCl.la L.t ~I '-I
. fp() "beH-y.4~r.:JJ" "'/'
",
~-3J<4
":"
"
~
(11)
;; (IOSO)
(14)
~ J--.= ;~ (1'00)
'\ en
~.
~,~ '\ '.1660)
~ . )
" .,...'..,\(65
:' ~.:.;,.?-
'!:i : ~ : ....
""W'. ~ : (N90J
" '" (~~)
, ~,..:., ,,-/~
-,
,m,
~'g ~
~
~
"",
C ,...:~
0" 1:1\
~ Ii
:~ ~: I
.~ ~ I I~
.-: ,.~~ l..:\
"'-,ltl
~ :.'" 'Y--'-7~;;.r
I~f~ AUD~
.. '_.. ~ ; ~~. (/630) ~
t/~ "
" ..
Q
(/700)
((,1)
.",~~.Y
(/uo./ ~
(&1/ <:
--- .. t__u
~ (/78cJ) ," (/6~aJ ~
'\. (17/ I~ ({.2) '\
~,
, (/770) S (/6641 ~
~ . ,:
(7-/-) " ~$) ':
'1"
(17=) (/670./
(1J) (~)
"
~ ~
~ .-
~ '
\'
(/7~)
(11)
(/73'0)
. (id)
(t7rq)
(7$)
/7"5
1
~
I; -
F-----.,-~-- _
f.
/43RD
1.0
I ..;:"V~' ~
0: (4,z)
"d t-=
I [1-.1) en
~I pLU) ~
,.
.<:.""":'....
~-
, (77)
:;.~'!/
~~
(7;,) "
, ,:$.l'J7'
t
I ,~~
.,0
.,
?
1/1 , '''/
'" ,
:; (.=3901 I~ =.:.r 7:.;
!2
(z4) I'/! (/4)
'" ( SEO) .-~ : ',,:: '-,
S! o ..."':...... oJ, .',
-, \ ~I
";'
It)} '~'(tf) "
';1
" ....
~ \S70) :0 (1';;," :' -
r
(III)
{SOO)'"
..,~'
~
\1-
I.L.
,-.J
~ U
~O::O
w'.
c
Z
::>
?
AVE. 8 2 NW.
./";"7~.
l;ic..~~,. c.
::. 5.;.;no.~ j.
. (ISo:.o)/72). ')"enie. .
,-' I; ~ /:' I
~~:.Qren::c "': 0 ('49/ Q
u.,t'''rJ- ;--1. .,
.~e.i-er:~('j,.C;
.Y5"7,:;(>3) I ,_~ /~/)
Q..oh......I...=. ~ /...,......::>,
"~!i..;,:"c..:":'c. "1- .ft'\~~.:L .
~ ...~yr-l'J.;1. i~,;
~ (I :JS.oX~. ~ 5~r"wr:: '" t.J
. ~"'~r' L. "-~
jr,!-u.;<< .-;.u:<~
,c, l!i~. . Fe'
. S"O.
; ,J''i-F;O. (?OJ.
.._ \,0 ~ '_"
r:....~.J...:&.e.t"~(
J."r:..
'so'
,'0 .1
t'/.;r;cj r4~1
J--.= ~,~"...~::. ~
CJ) !G.";';/unJt::.=~c,. ~o
Iod
~ (J-;-".-oj (~):I
l-
lL.
:J
u
0::0
W~
C
Z
::>
(48)
(J465.: ?
r/~) (4-1) ~
'"'
'80
(7)
Figure 2
(/,)
'n l85::1 .. :j~(
-
(1) i 211
(840) <>
" =
(11) .1116.,
'" (S30i .,
=
!II) _lOll..
on (8Z0) .,
-- '"
.. ~..::J!~'~" .-:".
:JJ;
J--.=
(/)8
,
~~.{:.
(.z)
(GS';j
I.!)
(U,o)
I'SQ' .
(4) . ~'
(7;O)?~ '
,
.';'
/5)
i-'7S-S)
(,
" ,~
. . ~':o-.:'
. ~ ',~."il:
Co... ~/.-,
" ~"w' 0
~ '1." C,\~
.'
.0
..
..
~,
/S',;;, ,
(IIJ)
(SIO)
(j)
(790)
(1:)
:/+.:0:'-
r:-.~.ic.- ;,
5.J'1S;'6U.,.! '.
(44)
,~j I
'5:>
:..: i.'li.
3 1
ik.,... .: ~..
'.
Lower Rum River WHO
2015 1st Ave.
Anoka, MN 55303
5-25-92
Re: Development Compl iance with the 1991 Wetland
Conservation Act
Lower Rum Riv~r WMO,
This letter is written pursuant to a site inspection on
Monday, June 22, 1991 of the properties of Rosella Sonsteby
located on Woodbine St, south of 143rd Ave in Andover. The
p~operties in question are the three southern most
p~ope~ties on the west side of Woodbine St. and the p~o~e~ty
south of Woodbine St. The properties are indicated on the
at-::achec maps. The properties he~eafter are referred to by
a.. assigned number l-4, numbe~ l being the no~thern most of
the properties anc number 4 being -::he souther.. mo~-:: of -::he
properties.
Much alteraticn to -::ne na-::u:-al soi Is, vegetation and
hydro:cgy has already cccuired !n lots 1-3 as a res~!~ of 2
grading and excavation project in 1984. Documentation of
this was submitted in the form of a handwritten agreement
between Rosella Sonsteby and Ward Lake Contracting, Inc.
The success of this excavation in terms of converting the
wetland to upland is questionable. Soil borings indicate a
presents of a thick layer of peat below the mineral soi I
fi I I. ApprOXimately 40ft. from the curbside, a ridge
approximately 4ft. high has been constructed of mineral soi
running north-south through properties 1-3. This ridge
appears to mark the lateral extent of the excavation that
was done.
It seems that the intent of the excavation project was
to convert the wetland to the east of the ridge into upland.
Th is, however, was a fa i I ed attempt, as wet I and vegetat ion
and soi Is sti II exist. Only 8" of mineral fi II overlaying
>3ft. of peat occur throughout much of the excavated area.
Wi Ilows, stinging nettle, reed canary grass and other
wetland species dominate the plant community. The hydrology
has been altered by changes in the topographic rei ief of the
site. Saturated soi Is were found at depths of 9in. in some
areas however, so the area has not been effectively drained.
"
Wetland boundaries were identified according the three
criteria of soi Is, vegetation and hydrology. The map
indicates the approximate location of the wetlands. Lots 1
and 4 are the onl~ lots with upland acreage. There does
appear to be sufficient upland acreage in lot 4 for the
mitigation of wetland losses in lots 1-3.
I investigated the various exemptions incorporated into
the Wetland Conservation Act and was unable to find anything
that appl ies to the area that was excavated with the intent
of producing upland. If the developer can produce evidence
,that prel iminary plat approval was granted within five years
prior to August 1, 1991 or that infrastructure was installed
for these lots, some exemptions could apply.
As is, mitigation wi I I be required for the majority of
development on these lots. The site has not been staked and
the areas of wetland indicated on the map are only
approximations. The next steps for the developer are to
have the wetlands del ineated and staked, devise plot plans,
calculate wetland acreage to be fi I led, and develop a
mitigation proposal. If the Anoka Conservation District can
be of any additional service in the identification and
del ineation of the we-i:lands on the site, please contact IJS
at 757-4221.
If the developer Wlsnes to have another opinion, a
-i:echnical evaluation committee should be formed as per -i:he
guidel ines of -i:he We-i:land Conserva'tion Act.
Yours very ;1W_rul~.
/7/ , /~ .
LA_--A-~
Chris A. Lord
Dis-i:rict Conservition Technician
sa:Sonsteby
August 28, 1992
Mr. Curtis Pearson
Wurst, Pearson, Larson,
Underwood & Mertz
110 First Bank Place West
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Dear Mr. Pearson:
This correspondence is merely to update you on the Lower Rum
River Watershed Management Organization's decision with
regard to updating the Joint Powers Agreement. At it's
August 20, 1992, regular meeting, the board decided to table
consideration on updating the Joint Powers Agreement. A copy
of those meeting minutes will be forthcoming. This issue
will again be in the September meeting agenda. We will keep
you updated on the board's position on this matter.
Thank you for your continued interest and concern relative to
LRRWMO matters.
Sincerely,
James E. Schrantz
Chairman
rnrn
cc: LRRWMO members
d rCL.+-r-
BYLAWS
LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
ARTICLE I
NAME AND MEMBERSHIP
Section 1. The name of this Organization shall be the
"Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization". The
members of this Organization- are' the following
municipalities:
City of Andover
Ci ty of Anoka
City of Coon Rapids
City of Ramsey
ARTICLE II
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Section 1. For the purposes of these bylaws, the terms
defined in this section shall have the meanings given them.
Section 2. "O~gani~ationit means the operational body
created by the Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the Lower
Rum River, the full name of which is "Lower Rum River
Watershed Management Organization". It shall be a public
agency of its members.
Section 3.
Board, consisting
governmental units
which shall be the
.\ ~
"Board" means the Watershed Management
of one representative from each of the
which is a party to ,this Agreement and
governing body of the 'Organization~
Section 4. "Council" means the governing body of a
governmental unit which is a member of this Organization~
Section 5. "Governmental Unit" means any city, county,
or town.
Section 6. "Member" means a governmental. unit which
entered into the Agreement.
Section 7. "Agreement" means the "Joint and Cooperative
Agreement" adopted by the four member city councils creating
and, establishing the "Lower Rum River Watershed Management
Organization" ~
Section 8. "Officers" means those persons designated as
officers in Article IV, Section 1 of these bylaws.
LRRWMO BYLAWS
AMENDED AUGUST 20, 1992
ARTICLE III
, '.
'ORGANIZATION MEMBERS
, Section 1.
'representatives;
agreement.
The -Organization
one from each of
shall have
the parties to
four
the
Section 2. The term of office of each member shall be
as set forth in the Joint Powers Agreement and until his or
her successor is selected and appointed by the member
governmental unit.
Section 3. If any ~Jpresentative-dies, resigns or is
removed, his office shall be deemed vacant, and a successor
shall be appointed for his unexpired term by the ;city council
which appointed him.
Section 4. Alternate 'representatives may be appointed
to represent a member. The Alternate must be appointed by
the City Council and may serve in lieu of the member's
'representative- if the representative is not present at the
meeting. If duly appointed, he may participate in all
discussions and may vote on all proposals before the "Board"
if the representative is not present.
ARTICLE N
OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
Section 1. The officers of the Organization shall be
the Chair, Vice-Chair, Secretary and Treasurer. The offices
of the Secretary and Treasurer may be combined "and held by
the same person. A Recording Secretary and a Deputy
Treasurer may be appointed by the Organization. The
Recording Secretary or the Deputy Treasurer need not be a
member.
Section 2. The term of office for all officers
one year, and they shall be selected at the first
meeting held after February 1.
shall be
business
Section 3. The Chair shall be the presiding officer of
the 'Organization~ He or she shall preside at all meetings of
the'Organ{z~tron,' but shall have all of the same privileges
of discussion, making motions and voting as do other members.
Section 4. The Vice-Chair shall, in the absence or
disability of the Chair, perform the duties and exercise the
powers of the Chair.
LRRWMO BYLAWS
AMENDED AUGUST 20, 1992
Section 5. The Treasurer shall have the custody of the
funds and securities of the Organization and shall keep full
and accurate accounts of receipts and disbursements in books
belonging to the Organization and shall deposit all monies
and other valuable effects in the name and to the credit of
the Organization in such depository as may be designated by
the Organtzatiori; He or she shall disburse the funds of the
.I' ..'tc..--._:r, ...........;_....,,::....... . ._. '_ __. .. .
Organ1zat1on as ordered by the Organ1zat1on on orders slgned
by the Chair, Vice-Chair, Secre'tary' or Treasurer, taking the
proper vouchers for such disbursements, and shall render to
the Organization at regular meetings, or as they may request,
an account of all his transactions as Treasurer and of the
financial condition of the Organization. He or she shall
supervise and direct the work of the Deputy Treasurer. No
Organization funds shall be disbursed without the signature
of at least two officers of the Organization, one of whom
shall be the Treasurer or his authorized'Deputy'Treasurer.
Section 6. The Secretary shall attend all meetings of
the Organization and shall act as Clerk of such meetings and
shall record all votes and the minutes of all proceedings in
a minute book kept for that purpose. He or she shall give
notice of ,all meetings of the ,Organization and shall perform
such other duties as may be prescribed by the Organizatiori~
He or she may assign the aforestated duties to'a Recording
Secretary if authorized to do so by the Cal'Hftlission. ' " ,.}
Or~A."'; -r." -""0
Section 7. The Deputy Treasurer, if one be appointed,
shall assist the Treasurer and shall perform his or her
administrative duties during the absence or disability of the
Treasurer, but the performance of such duties shall not make
him or her a member.
Section 8. The officers and employees of '. the
Organization shall give bond as required by the Organization,.
and by the Agreement, with corporate sureties satisfactory to
the Organization for the faithful performance of their duties
and for restoration to the Organization, in case of death,
resignation, retirement or removal' 'from off ice, of all books,
papers, vouchers, money and property of whatever kind coming
into their possession or under their control, belonging to
the Organization. ,The premium on any such bond shall be paid
out of ~rgani'zation.funds.
Section 9. Any person engaged to perform any service or
hold any office for the Organization, other than Chair, Vice-
Chair, Secretary and Treasurer, may be engaged on a full-
time, part-time or consulting basis, as determined by the
Oraanization.
LRRWMO BYLAWS
AMENDED AUGUST 20, 1992
ARTICLE V
MEETINGS
Section 1. Regular meetings of the Commission shall be
held at the Anoka City Hall, 2015 First Avenue, Anoka MN
55303.
Section' 2. Regular meetings shall be"held on the. third."
Thursday-'of"'eaclimcmth';"commencing':-at 8 :30~'a~m. ' The' Febrl:iary."
meeting" each year shall be the annual meeting at which the
new officers are selected and take office.
'__,', ,Section 3.
Organization shall
the Orgali'iz'ation
- ,..____~,._;.......:.. ~~'l'" ~.~. 'lit
representat1ves of
,".. .
Written notice of all meetings of the
be sent to all representatives and, should
so desire, to duly appointed Alternate
all parties.
Section 4. Special meetings of the prganization may be
called by the Chair or any other two representatives'jointly.
The purpose of any special meeting shall be stated in the
notice of the meeting.
Section 5. Written notice
mailed at least four days prior
notice of special meetings shall
prior to each such meeting.
of regular meetings shall be
to each meeting and written
be mailed at least two days
Section 6.
representatives or
constitute a quorum.
At any meeting of the Organization, three
their Alternate ,representatives shall
Section 7. If the Secretary is absent from the meeting,
and if a Recording Secretary has not been selected, the Chair
shall appoint a Secretary Pro Tern for each meeting.
Section 8. All meetings
accordance with Robert's Rules of
otherwise provided in the Agreement
shall be conducted
Order Revised, except
or these bylaws.
in
as
..--~.',.. " ...,,::. '. ~..:.
Section 9. The representatives may from time to time
determine the order of business for Organization meetings.
The usual order of business at such meetings shall be as
follows:
A. Call to Order
B. Roll Call
C. Minutes of Previous Meetings
D. Treasurer's Report
E. Payment of Bills
F. Report of Officers
LRRWMO BYLAWS
AMENDED AUGUST 20, 1992
G. Consideration of Communications
H. Pending Projects/Permit Reviews
I. Old Business
J. New Business
K. Adjournment
ARTICLE VI
POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE ORGANIZATION
Section 1. The Organization is
by the "Agreement". 'Its powers and
established in said "Agreement".
created and established
duties shall be those
Section 2. The Board may exercise
and incidental to the implementation of
set forth in the "Agreement".
all powers necessary
purposes and powers
Section 3. The board may establish work committees,
which committees shall act in an advisory capacity to the
Board. These committees may contain persons who are not
members of the 9rganization.,
ARTICLE VI
FINANCIAL MATTERS
Section 1. Organization funds may be expended in
accordance with pr'6cedures established by law for the
expenditure of funds for statutory cities. Orders, checks
and drafts shall be signed by the Chair, Vice-Chair or
Secretary and the Treasurer or Deputy Treasurer. All claims
shall be paid after audit by ,the,Qrganization: A roll call
vote shall be taken and theOrganlzati'clIl"'need not ., sign or
initial claim. At least two officers of the .Organization~
shall sign all orders, checks or drafts in accordance with
Article IV.
Section 2. The fiscal year of the ~~ganiz.ii.'tion~,shall
be February 1 to February 1.
Section 3.
to be made of
certified public
............,- :..... ....,.-
The Organization' shall cause an annual audit
all its books, reports and records by a
accountant.
"'~'.'~'.' "~""~'-'''':'''. .' ..
Section 4. A depository for Organization funds shall be
designated by the Organization~ at its annual meeting each
year. Prior to such designation the Treasurer may recommend
his choice of depository. Organization funds shall be
deposited in accordance with the laws applicable to cities.
LRRWMO BYLAWS
AMENDED AUGUST 20, 1992
ARTICLE VIII
AMENDMENTS TO BYLAWS
Section 1. These bylaws may be amended at any regular
or special meeting of the Organization; provided that a seven
day prior notice of the proposed amendment has been furnished
to each member.
,--..-.......... _. ,+. . .- ,~.-. ,-
Section 2. A majority vote of representativ~shall be
necessary to adopt any amendment to these bylaws.
Section 3. In any instance where these bylaws are in
conflict with the "Joint and Cooperative Agreement", the
Agreement shall control.
Adopted this 22nd day of January,
amended this 20th dayofAugust~ 1992.
1986,
....~~...,,-....-... .......~., -....,.....}.
an<:l,. firs t~'t
,- -.":'t:.f ~::.--. ':'''';'''~'......:.!..... ~
James E. Schrantz, Chair
ATTEST:
John Weaver, Secretary
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 101
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE DEFERRAL OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
FOR SENIOR CITIZENS AND RETIRED DISABLED HOMEOWNERS.
The City Council of the City of Andover does hereby
ordain:
SECTION I, SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEFERRAL. Pursuant to Minnesota
Statute Section 435.l93, the City Council may defer special
assessments levied against the homestead property of a senior
,citizens or retired disabled homeowner for whom it would be a
hardship to make the annual payments. The City Council will
act on all deferral requests once an application, as set forth
in Section 2, has been completed.
SECTION 2, ELIGIBILITY. Any person 65 years of age or older
or retired due to total or permanent disability may apply for
a deferral of special assessments provided the following
conditions are met:
1. Homestead. The property being assessed must be the
applicant's principal place of domicile. The classification
of the property as homestead on the County's tax rolls
combined with the applicant's name being shown as owner shall
be considered adequate proof that the property is the
applicant's homestead.
2. Annual Income. The applicant's income for the year
preceeding the year in which the application for deferment is
made shall not exceed $18,000.
The application, in a form to be prescribed by the City, shall
be completed and filed with the City Clerk, who will verify
that the applicant meets the above conditions. Any additional
forms required by the County of Anoka for recording the
deferral shall also be completed.
SECTION 3, INTEREST ON DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS. All deferred
assessments shall be subJect to and charged simple interest at
the rate established by the Andover City Council in the
resolution adopting the assessment roll. This interest shall
accrue over the life of the assessment. No interest shall
accrue past the date at which the assessment would have been
fully paid if not deferred.
SECTION 4. TERMINATION OF DEFERRAL STATUS. Special
assessments deferred pursuant to the eligibility requirements
set forth herein shall terminate and become payable, together
with accumulated interest, upon the occurrence of anyone of
the followinq events:
"
,
1. Transfer of ownership. The property is sold,
transferred, subdivided or in any way conveyed to another by
the individual for whom the deferral was granted.
2. Death of owner. The death of the owner qualified for
the deferral unless a surviving joint tenant or tenant in
common is eligible for the deferral benefit provided herein.
3. Non-homestead property. The property loses its
homestead status for any reason.
4.
would be
payment.
No hardship. The City Council determines that there
no hardship to require an immediate or partial
It shall be the duty of the applicant, their heirs or legal
representative to notify the City Clerk of any event which may
affect eligibility for deferment.
At the time of termination of the deferral, the City
Council may provide for payment of the deferred amounts in
installment payments in accordance with the original terms of
the special assessments.
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be effective
from and after its passage and publication according to the
law.
Adopted this 18th day of August, 1992, by the City Council of
the City of Andover.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
04~:tJ
Mayor
Kenneth D. Orttel,
{ad
, C1ty C er
-'
Paqe 2