HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC September 1, 1992
"
",;...' . ~
.CA.; CITY of ANDOVER
~:- /' Regular Ci ty Council Meeting - September 1, 1992
'- j
Call To Order - 7:30 P.M.
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Discussion Items
1. Amended Special Use Permit/Dover Kennels
'2. variance/G&R Elevator/Parking Requirements
3. Area Identification Sign/Emmerich
4. Eldorado Street Right-of-Way Acquisition
5. Pheasant Glen Assessment Discussion
Staff, Committee, Commissions
6. Lund Settlement Agreement
7. Approve Hidden Creek East Park Concept Plan
8. Award Quotes/Park Trailer
, , 9. Approve Change/1992 Capital Equipment
~ 10. Approve Ad for Bids/Makeup Air System/Senior Center
11. Sidewalk @ City Garage
12. Schedule Public Hearing/Budget
Non-Discussion Items
13. Request Speed Study/168th Lane E. of Round Lake Blvd.
14. Receive Petition/92-19/Weybridge 3rd
15. Approve Resolution/Zoning of South Andover Site
16. Minor Amendment to Comprehensive Plan/Weybridge 3rd
17. Adopt 1993 Proposed Property Tax Levy
Mayor/Council Input
Approval of Claims
Adjournment
, )
'-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
'-
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPRlfVED FOR
NO. Approval of Minutes AGEN CQ
ITEM Admin. 0
NO. Approval of Minutes BY: V. Yolk O. . BI
t/
The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
August 18, 1992 Regular Meeting (Jacobson absent)
, August 11, 1992 Budget Meeting (Smith absent)
\
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY SECOND BY
\ TO
DATE ~pp~pmhpr 1. 1992
'--
@'
'"''''Z'\
~
" (}\)
o 'i'~~~?:x~;::~l(
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE September 1, 1992
AGEND~i%~~~~on Items
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Plann~ng
~
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
ITEM Kennel Operation
NO. 16422 Hanson Blvd. NW
BY:
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to review the Amended Special Use Permit
request of Jeff Bergeron (Dover Kennels) to expand the kennel
operation from 26 dogs to 45 dogs on the property located at
16422 Hanson Boulevard NW and legally described on the attached
resolution.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the Special Use Permit
process.
"--
Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03, establishes those uses allowed by
Special Use Permit. In an R-1, Single Family Residential
District, dog kennels are allowed by the granting of a Special Use
pe rmi t.
In granting an Amended Special Use Permit, the City Council shall
examine the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety,
morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
Planning & zoning Review
The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their August 11, 1992
meeting, recommended approval of the Amended Special Use Permit
request with conditions. Attached for your review are the minutes
and the staff report from the meeting.
Attached is a proposed resolution for Council review and adoption.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
~l
~lTY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -92
,
~ A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF
JEFF BERGERON (DOVER KENNELS) TO EXPAND HIS KENNEL OPERATION
FROM 26 TO 45 DOGS ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16422 HANSON
BOULEVARD NW, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS:
THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
o
WHEREAS, Jeff Bergeron of Dover Kennels has requested an
Amended Special Use Permit to expand his kennel operation
from 26 dogs to 45 dogs on the property located at 16422
Hanson Boulevard NW and legally described above; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed
the request and has determined that said request meets the
qriteria of Ordinance 8, Sections 5.03 and 7.03; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the
proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands; the use
will not cause serious traffic congestions or hazards; the use
will not depreciate surrounding property values; and the use would
be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no
opposition regarding said request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the Amended Special Use Permit
requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning and Zoning Commission to grant the Amended Special Use
Permit requested to allow Jeff Bergeron (Dover Kennels) to expand
his kennel operation from 26 dogs to 45 dogs on said property with
the following conditions:
1. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual
review by Staff.
2. The kennel license will be subject to annual renewal.
3. Shooting will be at a minimum.
4. The Special Use Permit covers the full 60 acre parce~.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
1st day of September, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
~
Victoria volk, City Clerk
...~.
CITY of ANDOVER
,
'--~
Regular Planning and zoning Cd~mi55ion Meeting
August 11, 1992 - Minutes
The Regularly Scheduled Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting was called to order by Chairperson Bonnie Dehn at 7:30
P.M., Tuesday, August 11, 1992 at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., Andover, MN.
Commissioners Present:
Commissioners Absent:
Also Present:
Jonak; Peek; McMullen; Dehn; Pease
Apel
Dave Carlberg, City Planner; others
Aoproval of Minutes - July 28, 1992 - Soecial CC/P&Z Meeting
MOTION by Peek, seconded by Jovanovich to approve the minutes of
the Special Meeting of July 28, 1992 as presented. Motion
carried unanimously.
~~
Approval of Minutes - July 28, 1992 - Regular P & Z Meeting
Mr. Carlberg asked that for clarification purposes, he would like
to note that regarding the Public Hearing for Real estates signs
for the Meadows of Round Lake in a residential district you are
allowed only one sign per lot frontage. This is pursuant to
Ordinance 8, Section 8.07.
MOTION by Peek, seconded by Jovanovich to approve the minutes of
the July 28, 1992 regular meeting as clarified. Motion carried
unanimously.
CEJ Public Hearing/Amended Special Use Permit/Dover Kennels
Mr. Carlberg explained the request to expand the kennel operation
owned by Jeff Bergeron from 26 dogs to 45 dogs. In 1988 Mr.
Bergeron was issued a Special Use Permit for the kennel
operation. At that time he had requested 80 dogs but reduced the
number to 26. One of the concerns at the time this went before
the Planning Commission was the noise caused by the shooting done
during training. However, the city has received no complaints
regarding the operation. Mr. Carlberg also noted that Mr.
Bergeron has approval from the Building Department to add on to
his existing kennel.
Jeff Bergeron stated that he spoke to his neighbors and they do
not have a problem with the expansion of the kennel operation.
,,)
,
~~
Regular Planni~g Commission Meeting
August 11, 1992 - Minutes
Page 2
(Amended Special Use Permit, Cont.)
Commissioner Jovanovich asked how big the kennel spaces are. Mr.
Bergeron noted that they are 3' x 16' each with inside space as
well as outside soace. Commissioner Jovanovich auestioned what
requirements there are for dogs being boarded and if Mr. Bergeron
has a State license. Mr. Bergeron stated that all dogs have to
have up to date shots for parvo, distemper and rabies and that he
does not have a license through the State.
Commissioner Janak asked when development of this area
would take place. Mr. Carlberg noted that if development does
occur, the lots would have to be 2.5 acres as that area does not
have city sewer and/or water.
MOTION by Pease, seconded by McMullen to close the public
hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
)
/
MOTION by Peek, seconded by Pease that the Andover Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of an
Amended Special Use Permit for a kennel license requested by Jeff
Bergeron of Dover Kennels to expand the kennel operation from 26
dogs to 45 on the property located at 16422 Hanson Boulevard NW.
The Commission finds the request meets the criteria established
in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, including: the use will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of
the community; the use will not cause serious traffic congestion
or hazards; the use will not depreciate surrounding property; and
the use is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Commission shall also make the following conditions:
1. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual review
by staff;
2. The kennel license will be subject to annual renewal;
3. Shooting will be at a minimum;
4. The full 60 acre parcel will be utilized;
5. A public hearing was held and there was no comment.
Motion carried unanimously.
~)
variance/Parking Requirements/G & R Elevator
Mr. Carlberg explained that G & R Elevator is requesting a
variance to Ordinance No.8, Section 8.08, parking Requirements.
The property is located at 2352- 136th Avenue N.W., which is Lot
2, Block 2, Andover Commercial Park. The property is zoned
General Business. The ordinance requires a minimum number of off
street parking spaces to be provided based on the use of the
building. G & R's building will be 14,960 square feet and the
i
I'
r "
,)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
August 11, 1992
AGENDA ITEM
3. Public Hearing
Amended SUP
Kennel Operation
16422 Hanson Blvd N1
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
BY:
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
~
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the
Amended Special Use Permit requested by Jeff Bergeron of Dover
Kennels to expand the kennel operation from 26 dogs to 45 dogs
on the property located at 16422 Hanson Boulevard NW. The
property is legally described as follows:
The North half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter
of Section 15, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
. '\
-J
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the Special Use Permit
process. Section 5.03 requires that "any change involving
structural alteration, enlargement, intensification of use, or
similar change not specifically permitted by the Special Use
Permit shall require an amended Special Use Permit and all
procedures shall apply as if a new permit were being issued".
Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03 lists those uses allowed by Special
Use Permit. In an R-I, Single Family Rural District, dog kennels
are allowed under a Special Use Permit.
In granting a Special Use Permit, the following criteria shall be
examined.
1. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals
and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
2. The existing and anticipated traffic conditions including
parking facilities on adjacent streets and land.
3. The effect on the values of property and scenic views in the
surrounding area.
4. The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan.
The Commission should consider these criteria when making a
decision to recommend to the City Council approval or denial.
Ordinance No.8, Section 3.02, Definitions, defines a "Dog Kennel"
\ as "any place where four or more dogs over the age of six months
,_) are boarded, bred and/or offered for sale, except a veterinary
'clinic".
,
Page Two
Amended SUP - Jeff Bergeron (Dover Kennels)
16422 Hanson Boulevard NW
August 11, 1992
~~
GENERAL REVIEW
"
The applicant on June 21, 1988 was granted a Special Use Permit to
operate a boarding and training kennel at the property indicated
above. Attached for Commission review is the resolution listing
the conditions of the permit. The concerns indicated at the
meetings centered around the number of dogs (80 were requested),
the noise factor and the traffic patterns generated by the
operation.
COMMISSION OPTIONS
\
1. The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve the Amended
Special Use Permit for a kennel license requested by Jeff Bergeron
of Dover Kennels to expand the kennel operation from 26 dogs to 45
on the property located at 16422 Hanson Boulevard NW.
The Commission finds the request meets the criteria established in
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, including: the use will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of
the community; the use will not cause serious traffic congestions
or hazards; the use will not depreciate surrounding property; and
the use is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan
The Commission shall also make the following conditions:
J
1. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual review
by Staff.
2. The kennel license will be subject to annual renewal.
3. Other conditions as deemed necessary by the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
2. The Planning and Zoning Commission may deny the Amended
Special Use Permit requested by Jeff Bergeron of Dover Kennels to
expand the kennel operation from 26 dogs to 45 on the property
located at 16422 Hanson Boulevard NW.
The Commission finds the request does not meet the criteria
established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03. In denying the
request, the Commission shall state those reasons for doing so.
3. The Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item.
,
)
, /
"
\
'.-./
...
I
,
/
~v-;;:o::._:;."''''
" ..
~. "--';
. 4
~_.1. 6}
\.a. J
>:-- ~ 1'1
"':~ -
''-'~~~",'"''
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
"
Property Address
/ & C(01 001. /L~/1-i.Y" -J 62-v(.0
,
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is apporpriate):
Lot
Block
Addi tion
Plat Parcel PIN
(If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal)
*********************************************************************
Reason for Request
v/l-t~2
WV"1/1-l.' <"-t,.v/)'r-~
L
AI H3'- Q F .:YL
h" (( 7;{LftJ-r Ai i?-t51'J
,
;>-0 4t:.c .Dc)bS
A--v l /f(:.-F-~ <-">.
KL2d/V',-,z t...
.
A
7V
C),(o
/..s 0/Zv-u./ /-"VC
/~~2- /
t'")
/"rV C~t'..!.ft.S L.-l.
)pp~~
~&""l
Section of Ordinance
'1.03
;<'-1
Current Zoning
*********************************************************************
-r~rf" gE/Z.Gb~()..J
)I /,a~.-15 (j,;tj A' ell ()
fJ(j VI2-.< b-Nfv..Z-?J-
Name of Applicant
Address
Home Phone
Signature
Business Phone
'>,<:'./77 1..7
Date
7-)J-- 90L
*********************************************************************
Property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address
\,
.J
Home Phone
Signature
Business Phone
Date
*********************************************************************
o
o
, '\
'-~
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PAGE 2
"
The following information shall be submi~ted prior to review by the
City of Andover:
1. A scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks;
adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures
within 100 feet.
2. The names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet
of the subject property.
Application Fees:
Commercial
Residential
Amended SUP
Recording Fee
$190.00
~
$~)
.f$u(.OO
';Is- /q l.
Receipt it
4 Z&(, 7
Date Paid
Rev. 1-07-92:d'A
Res. 179-91 (11-05-91)
CRITERIA FOR GRANTING SPECIAL USE PERMITS
In granting a Special Use Permit, the City Council shall consider the
advice and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and:
1. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals
and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
2. Existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking
facilities on adjacent streets and lands.
3. The effect on values of property and scenic views in the
surrounding area.
4. The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan.
fl / -----------if-
.)'K ,\,\' I. "/1' I 'TJ\I!~ ~r:-~TT. .-- :-;- ~ s
~ \If, I .,.~O, 1 . ~ "IIf-- '=:::p' \. j' J ~
0..5. C"OOOl.l~.J?Fl1'! '1'-\ '.....'i_.~' I ~ :
.:.. . /,,:'" . I ' ~'OG0, . LJ ' /"'- -.l
~:-:!-. . U,.l' '" L-- '::_>>':),'AI <;', '-::s- ,:t I
~.:::l)C"-\~:.~\:~-~ ~,' H :\.MJ:;;;.!;..~ I " ~ ! I I
~' ~ '. u ,.,,1 '" ~. '. ~ ! I I
" -"\\,""': . ,I' ,. i~ I I
= '-- WHfr:'r- , : ' , ' I' ;{ .,:. " ~:' _ _ J _ n _ h n h ' I '
hu_ 4' 'OA-KS ' :un__n 1_.l._~-J___~ _~~-o.W~-~-::5....~---==#~_~__~~f-____-;-___
~\, '.ih{jim y" l~-! ~..~ I 1 ;\l I
- :F'';, n.\::- I ',', I I , , I
; -; , ;S'F~'f. ,'S. I I "'", I , I I
~' j' r . '\ I ".... , I ,~ I
~ I ',', I ,'1
'-" " . '1 >.:....... '! ' , ,
~ I I ii',' , I
I', L'UNDs l'EVERGREfNi2, I I, I ,1,..',
I I.. I I 1 ' I - , , I 00
---,-.:gr----- "',
_I 'oSTAToSI,J' ,If, !. , gl' I II 01 ',....' ~
Q1 t . 5TH 'ct
~: ./.'51' ~ . Jr-:..... ,4 W~ I
Nl '...~ l~' t;' I '--
---'jfGl' f1--. , I
: :.:) It'4j t:S'f"f!'f , z --.400. l
, "I!' I I I Y ~LJ -
'~ :, : -ffS~lr, I II ' I II --;:::::::::;:::L:-;:~::_:-::
'. ,~'" c/!~5\ I --__ ~!
~ ' 15~~~~tl/. '//~I' i ! ---~::~'<:J'l?~..
~h"I~~ ~ I ~O?"l' ';,'<l\ ~~
\~' 'r y/ ikr:~
J:JY-. . /' I' ,
I l ~ /1/: :
1-( ,.--1l'\~ Y1 ' III Illhl, _~, ..... ,.
I LlLJ:1 _''''_~'__'U ~ ~ Q.lI ~~ :- i
~ '" .~,- ,~~.._. JL, . ~' ,irT.~ ~~~ :
'1 \1 2: "'.., ~ i I II i": '[ ; \.L1J!
1 .......... --i ---.J I
r: '{
f--- .~
I .~ "l II
.......){ -- ~()i,.._.J1 j I
~ --~" I I
,.-~ I .~ I I
"'-' ~ : ~ I ~___
~ ----'----- .f-----i---- I I.'
" , I . I . 1tJ/!IHT/ItII6A1JrESrA1'D f4:: ~& I
"-.NlGNrlNliALE , SQ;'(JNtJ AiJOITfON 1/ ~ I I I ~"""Io I : ~
NIGHTINGALE ~ I I 0..:.....'. I "
~ ESTATES I' EST~TES I u ~
., ~~.I ; '. 'u i : I _l ~~! ., 1
. ~I~ ,;.m ':::J - ~fi;::i~:i ~:' " i
I iii i~1X'."'~ : I ~
I I', I , .
"". ~';; , ' I......,
I II I 1 hi,i "..J..... ~'----~--__--l_~__:1
' - ~"o.- I'" .. ilt ~'\Q I ............ii
I ( i: ",.".~." :1f7l I I,i
I """",;~ II
I .. .. : ,C'J1T. ,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~"l4J
---
~ W-
/~I
I
~
~
"
I~
'" ,
" 1
~ 1
1 I
I
I i
~
n
"
;
;
,
J
,h
I 'OIL
tfe~
"".,.
,.\
\}-
, )
'-----I
I
:1
'----..l
i
,
I
I \
,-.J
.
I',
I '
I
'.
: - \
..t" )
"
41
. -
! . ,',
,',,is IS A COMPILATION OF RECORDS AS
THEY APPEAR IN THE ANOKA COUNTY
OFFICES AFFECTING THE AREA SHOWN.
THIS DRAWING IS TO BE USED ONLY FOR
REFERENCE PURPOSES AND THE COUN-
TY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY IN-
ACCURACIES HEREIN CONTAINED.
@
..:k....
,
\
I
I
!
,
,
(il
u, ----; SITE
r- - - - - - - - -~" -'~ - - -
$;".r At,.::.~ _ r A/.~-.V"
?~
",
~
659/5
'.'
HE CORNER
SEC. 5
. /.tr.<J/
oJ 6'~'/8 J'84
/#~.:I
:;:'" ..!f.a4
: "y."",.~/~:
.~
"-
~
"
,
,
~
...
.
,
-; - -- (SU -,;
.~ ...;
,
......
~
~
. -
~ I ~
~ ~ ,i ~
~ ti.. :
.(;:)- u--1
,
I
1
,I
I
.,
.
~......
~~
~ .......
'\
'-~
\'
, "
o
N >
I'..J
~
"\
~~
~
G\
~
'i
-ri<.E::= /I,u~ A1)&Jr:fJotJ
U
I tOINtf-. 0 ~
iW
I )/DV~ [
~
r<
Hl7-iVSON
, .~)
.33D Pf;.[;r
8L.v-h
----------:
I
I
~I
.,J
l~i
- I
l~/
'A
j \J .
I 1
I
i
i
,
1
I
I
i
J
>'
I
, \
,,)
,)
~ )
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO. R132-88
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY JEFFREY
AND LINDA BERGERON TO OPERATE A BOARDING AND TRAINING KENNEL ON
THE PROPERTY AT 16422 HANSON BOULEVARD N.W.
WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice, the Planning
and Zoning Commission has reviewed the special use permit request of
Jeffrey and Linda Bergeron; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the request and heard
testimony from neighboring residents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby approve the special use permit requested by
J~ffrey and Linda Bergeron with the following conditions:
1. The kennel will be for a maximum limit of 26 dogs;
2. Shooting will be at a minimum.
3. The Special Use Permit covers the full 60 acre parcel.
4. There will be a 6 month review.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
21st
day of
June
, 1988.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
~/ (u u.. .-;"{/
J r' Windschitl - Mayor
~k
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
, "
J
.....J
/ '\
, /
" ./
~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
','
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, August 11, 1992 at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the Amended Special
Use Permit request of Jeff Bergeron (Dover Kennels) to expand the
kennel operation (boarding and training) from 26 dogs to 45 dogs
located at 16422 Hanson Boulevard NW legally described as the
North half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 15, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota.
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
A copy of the application and location will be available at
Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
~/~
V~ctor~a Volk, City Clerk
Publication dates: July 31, 1992
August 7, 1992
"
Donald Osman
1781 - '167th
Andover, MN
.'
Avenue NW
55304
10 32 24 44 0001
, "
; orne & Gayle Pikus
1u:5'26 Hanson Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
'\
J
"-
"j
':.
Edward Bayers
1657 - 161st Avenue
Andover, MN 55304
NW
Dorothy Aasness
16425 Hanson Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
.-
@\"'<;"
....~
\\
'"
h
:1
~ .
ij'
/1
o ~,,,,,,<",,,,,",,:P'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
September 1, 1992
DATE
BY:
~~~~~R
BY:
ITEM
NO.
~.
VC1~.LC1UI.,;t:: t'arKlng
2352 l36th Ave NW
G & R Elevator
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT \)
Plannlng ~
David L. Carlberg,
City planner
AGENDA DS.ECTION . It
NQ lSCUSSlon ems
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to review the variance request of G & R
Elevator to Section 8.08(I)(28) of Ordinance No.8, the zoning
Ordinance. Section 8.08(I)(28), allows the City Council to reduce
the number of parking spaces required by the zoning Ordinance up
to a maximum of ten (10%) percent. The applicant is requesting a
reduction of thirty-two (32%) percent of the parking requirements.
The property is located at 2352 l36th Avenue NW and is legally
described as Lot 2, Block 2, Andover Commercial Park.
Attached are the staff report and the minutes from the August 11,
1992 Planning and zoning Commission meeting.
Please note that the applicant is willing to construct the
additional spaces required upon the construction of the proposed
6,000 square foot addition shown on the Commercial Site Plan.
i
'-...
Attached is a resolution indicating the recommendation of the
Planning and zoning Commission to approve the variance requested
by G & R Elevator.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
\.'.-
\
'J
,
o
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R
-92
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE VARIANCE REQUEST OF G & R ELEVATOR TO
ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 8.08(I)(28) WHICH ALLOWS THE CITY
COUNCIL TO REDUCE PARKING FACILITIES UP TO TEN (10%) PERCENT OF
THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE ON
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2352 136TH AVENUE NW, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS
LOT 2, BLOCK 2, ANDOVER COMMERCIAL PARK.
WHEREAS, G & R Elevator has requested a variance to
Ordinance No.8, Section 8.08(I)(28) which allows the City
Council to reduce parking facilities up to ten (10%) percent of
the number of spaces required by the zoning Ordinance on the
property indicated above; and
. WHEREAS, G & R Elevator is requesting they be allowed to
construct 17 parking spaces instead of the 25 required by the
zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the variance would consist of an adjustment of
the 10% limit on the number of parking spaces that can be reduced
or deferred increasing the limit to 32%; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the variance request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning & zoning Commission and hereby approves the request of
G & R Elevator for a variance to Ordinance No.8, Section
8.08(I)(28) which allows the City Council to reduce parking
facilities up to ten (10%) percent of the number of spaces
required by the zoning Ordinance on the property indicated above
with the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall comply with Paragraphs A-C of Ordinance
No.8, Section 8.08(I)(28).
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
1st day of September, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
ura~nance-No.e;-Section
additional spaces for each one hundred (100)
cinema seats or fraction thereof to the basic
requirements.
.'
(2) Centers having greater than one hundred
thousand (100,000) square feet up to and
including two hundred thousand (200,000)
square feet of GLA: add to the basic
requirement three (3) spaces for each one
hundred (100) cinema seats or additional
fraction thereof above four hundred and fifty
(450) .
.'
, '\
o
(3) Centers having greater than two hundred
thousand (200,000) square feet of GLA: add to
the basic requirement three (3) spaces for
each one hundred (100) cinema seats or
additional fraction thereof above seven
hundred and fifty (750).
o
24. Skatin Rink (Private), Dance Hall, or Public
Auction House. Twenty (20) of street par ~ng spaces,
plus one (1) additional off-street parking space for
each two hundred (200) square feet of floor space over
two thousand (2,000) square feet.
25. warehousing, storage or Handling of Bulk Goods.
That space wh~ch is solely used as office shall comply
with the office use requirements and one (1) additional
space for each two thousand (2,000) square feet of floor
area or fraction thereof, plus one (1) additional space
for each employee on maximum shift and one (1)
additional space for each company owned truck (if not
stored inside principal building).
26. undertaking Establishments. Twenty (20) parking
spaces for each chapel or parlor, plus one (1)
additional space for each funeral vehicle maintained on
the premises. Aisle spacing shall also be provided off
the street for making up a funeral procession.
27. Other Uses. Other uses not specifically mentioned
herein shall be determined on an individual basis by the
City Council. Factors to be considered in such
determination shall include (without limitation) size of
building, type of use, number of employees, expected
volume and turnover of customer traffic and expected
frequency and number of delivery or service vehicles.
~28. Reduced Parking Facilities. When demonstrated to
~ the sat~sfact~on of the City Council that up to ten
percent (10%) of the number of parking spaces required
by this Ordinance would not be needed for the particular
use in question, a reduced number of parking spaces may
be approved subject to the following:
~
(a) The application for reduction shall be
accompanied by supporting data specifically
applying to the particular use in question or
showing a lesser national standard.
Page 81
Orainance No.8, Section
o
(b) The applicant must also provide each of the
following.
(1) A detailed parking plan demonstrating
that the parking otherwise required by this
Ordinance can be provided on the site within
ordinance design standards; and
"
'.'
(2) A covenant in recordable form, approved
as to form and content by the City Attorney,
executed by all property owners, which
covenant provides that the owners, heirs,
successors and assigns, will not use the area
identified for expansion parking for any use
except landscaping or to cause compliance with
the off-street parking requirements of this
Ordinance.
(c) The City may order installation of previously
exempted parking spaces at any time when, in the
City's judgement. conditions indicate the need for
such parking, and the property owner shall comply
with said order.
(J) Joint Facilities.
~
Off-street parking facilities for a combination of mixed
buildings, structures or uses may be provided collectively in
any business of recreational district in which separate
parking facilities for each separate building, structure or
use would be required, provided that the total number of
spaces provided shall equal the sum of the separate
requirements of each use during any peak hour parking period,
subject to the following conditions:
1. The building or use for which application is being
made to utilize the off-street parking facilities
provided by another building or use shall be located
within three hundred (300') feet of such parking
facili ties.
2. There shall be no substantial conflict in the
principal operating hours of the two (2) buildings or
uses for which joint use of off-street parking
facilities is proposed.
3. A properly drawn legal instrument, executed by the
parties concerned for joint use of off-street parking
facilities, duly approved as to form and manner of
execution by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the
City Clerk and recorded with the Anoka County Recorder.
Off-Site Parking.
(K)
o
1. Any off-site parking which is used to meet the
requirements of this Ordinance shall require a Special
Use Permit as regulated by Section 5.03 of this
Ordinance and shall be subject to the conditions listed
herein.
Paqe 82
, \
~
Regular Planni~g Commission Meeting
August 11, 1992 - Minutes
Page 2
(Amended Special Use Permit, Cont.)
Commissioner Jovanovich asked how big the kennel spaces are. Mr.
Bergeron noted that they are 3' x 16' each with inside space as
well as outside soace. Commissioner Jovanovich auestioned what
requirements there are for dogs being boarded and if Mr. Bergeron
has a State license. Mr. Bergeron stated that all dogs have to
have up to date shots for parvo, distemper and rabies and that he
does not have a license through the Stace.
Commissioner Jonak asked when develooment of this area
would take place. Mr. Carlberg noted that if development does
occur, the lots would have to be 2.5 acres as that area does not
have city sewer and/or water.
MOTION by Pease, seconded by McMullen to close the public
hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
, )
'-/
MOTION by Peek, seconded by Pease that the Andover Planning and
zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of an
Amended Special Use Permit for a kennel license requested by Jeff
Bergeron of Dover Kennels to expand the kennel operation from 26
dogs to 45 on the property located at 16422 Hanson Boulevard NW.
The Commission finds the request meets the criteria established
in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, including: the use will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of
the community; the use will not cause serious traffic congestion
or hazards; the use will not depreciate surrounding property; and
the use is in harmony with the Comprehensive plan.
The Commission shall also make the following conditions:
1. The Soecial Use Permit will be subject to annual review
by staff;
2. The kennel license will be subject to annual renewal;
3. Shooting will be at a minimum;
4. The full 60 acre parcel will be utilized;
5. A public hearing was held and there was no comment.
Motion carried unanimously.
\)
Variance/Parking Requirements/G & R Elevator
Mr. Carlberg explained that G & R Elevator is requesting a
variance to Ordinance No.8, Section 8.08, parking Requirements.
The property is located at 2352- 136th Avenue N.W., which is Lot
2, Block 2, Andover Commercial Park. The property is zoned
General Business. The ordinance requires a minimum number of off
street parking spaces to be provided based on the use of the
building. G & R's building will be 14,960 square feet and the
, ~
~~
Regular Planning Com~ission Meeting
August 11, 1992 - Micutes
Page 3
(Variance/G&R Elevator, Cont.)
,-
number of spaces required are: Office space of 1,960 square
feet-8 spaces; Manufacturing space of 1,000 square feet - 3
spaces; warehouse space of 12,000 square feet - 14 spaces
(includes 8 employees at maximum shift). G & R Elevator is
requesting to allow for 17 parking spaces. Mr. Carlberg also
noted that with their proposed expansion they would need 3
additional spaces for the proposed warehouse assuming the number
'of employees does not increase.
Commissioner Pease noted that when a variance is granted it is
for an unlimited time and there is no way to go back and monitor
it when they need additional spaces. Mr. Carlberg explained that
if someone else buys the building and they have more employees
they would be required to increase the number of parking spaces.
He noted that the City Council can grant them a 10% reduction for
the number of spaces required.
\
~j
Ron Hudak, G & R Elevator stated that if they expand they would
have no problem w~th putting in the additional parking at that
time.
Mr. Carlberg noted that the Andover Review Committee has reviewed
this proposal and they would like to see all of the parking
stalls that are required.
Reoresentative of G & R Elevator explained that they do strictly
selling over the phone. They have been in business for 14 years
and do $1,000,000 worth of business yearly. To put 25 parking
stalls in now would just be a waste of their money.
Discussion centered on deferred parking in lieu of a variance.
Commissioner Jonak felt that deferred parking sounds reasonable
as he didn't think there are grounds to grant a variance. Mr.
Carlberg noted that at the joint meeting with the City Council,
it was said that a deferred parking agreement would be
acceptable. He again explained that Ordinance 8, Section 8.08
allows the City Council to grant a 10% reduction in parking
spaces. He felt that the Planning Commission could vary from
that,10% and that is what we could vary from. Chairperson Dehn
noted that it would be a 32% reduction.
, \
, )
MOTION by Peek, seconded by Jovanovich that the Andover planning
and zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of a
variance requested by G & R Elevator to vary from Ordinance 8,
Section (I) Paragraph 28 allowing the applicant to have 17 stalls
instead of the required 25 on the property located at 2352 -
136th Avenue N.W., legally described as Lot 2, Block 2, Andover
Comercial Park. The variance would consist of an adjustment of
the 10% limit on the number of parking spaces that can be
deferred increasing this to approximately 32% and that the
. '\
'--)
Planning Commissio~ Meeting
August 11, 1992 - Minutes
Page 4
(Variance, G&R Elevator, Cont.)
"
applicant is to comply with Paragraphs A, B, and C of Ordina~ce
3, Section 8.08 (I), ?aragraph 28.
Motion carried unanimously.
Discussion - Area Identification Sign - Emmerich
Mr. Carlberg explained that this item has been waiting until
Ordinances 8 & 10 were amended regarding permanent monument
'signs. Council did approve the amendments and the process will
now be that the Special Use Permit for the signs will be
submitted with the preliminary plat. The Andover Review
Committee will look at the signs. One sign per development is
allowed and any additional signs will be reviewed by the Andover
Review Committee who will make a recommendation to the Planning
Commission who will make a recommendation to the City Council.
Commissioner Peek asked what the criteria for allowing additional
signs will be. Mr. Carlberg noted that the Review Committee is
\ working on that now. Size of the development will be a major
, / consideration along with separation of signs.
Mr. carlberg asked if the Commission wants the Emmerich sign to
go to the Council with the same motion and vote as it did in
December of 1991. The Commission agreed that it should go back
with the same motion and vote.
Other Business
Discussion was on the junkyards and whether they should be
allowed to build buildings and keep their yards the same size or
build buildings and reduce the size of the yards. Mr. Carlberg
noted that the city attorney said that we could require that the
yard sizes be reduced over a number of years.
, )
Commissioner Pease explained that a while ago, the city would not
allow several of the junkyard owners to replace an existing sign
with a new one. She questioned whether we could allow them to
build new buildings if we wouldn't allow them to replace a sign.
A work session with the owners of the junkyards will be scheduled
by City Staff at a regular meeting.
It was suggested that the inspections of the junkyards take place
earlier in the year to allow them time to make any modifications
or repairs before the license renewals went to the City Council.
Variances for decks encroaching on the sideyard setback were
discussed as these requests have been increasing because builders
put patio windows on the side of houses and then there is only 10
, '\
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUESTF,OR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
,-,j
DA~ust 11. 1992
AGENDA ITEM
4. Vari,ance - Parking
Req. - G & R Elevator
2352 136th Ave NW
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
1?u
David L. Carlberg
city Planner
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the
request of G & R Elevator for a variance to Ordinance No.8,
Section 8.08, Parking Requirements. The property is located at
2352 l36th Avenue NW, legally described as Lot 2, Block 2,
Andover Commercial Park.
The property is zoned GB, General Business.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No.8, Section 8.08(1), requires a mlnlmum number of
off-street parking spaces to be provided based on the use of the
building. Section 8.08(1) requires the following parking spaces
for the following uses:
, '\
'--../
Office - one (1) space for each 250 s.f. of floor area
Manufacturing - one (1) space for each 350 s.f. of floor area,
plus one (1) additional space for each company owned truck if not
stored within the principal building.
Warehouse - One (1) space for each 2,000 s.f. of floor area, plus
one (1) additional space for each employee at maximum shift and
one (1) additional space for each company owned truck not stored
within the principal building.
G & R Elevator is constructing a 14,960 square foot building with
the building space being allocated as follows:
Office Space
Manufacturing
Warehouse
Total space
1,960 s.L
1,000 s.L
12,000 s.L
14,960 s.L
According to Section 8.08(1), G & R Elevator is required to have
the following number of parking stalls:
Office -
Manufacturing
Warehouse -
Total
8
- 3
14
25'
(includes 8 employees at maximum shift)
\ G & R Elevator is requesting to allow for 17 parking stalls
'- ./
Page Two
Variance - G & R Elevator
2352 136th Avenue NW
August 11, 1992
~
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04, establishes the variance procedure
and process. Variances may be granted where there are practical
difficulties or unnecessary hardships in any way of carrying out
the strict letter of the provisions of the zoning Ordinance. The
hardships or difficulties must have to do with the characteristics
of the land and not the property owner.
GENERAL REVIEW
G & R Elevator is requesting a variance to allow them to have at a
minimum 17 parking stalls instead of the 25 required by the zoning
Ordinance. It should be noted that applicant is planning to
construct an 6,000 square foot addition to the building for
warehousing which would require at least an additional three (3)
parking stalls. This number would increase however if the number
of employees at maximum shift increases. with the proposed
parking expansion (10 stalls) the applicant would be one stall
short of the required 28 stalls.
COMMISSION OPTIONS
A.
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend
approval of the variance requested by G & R Elevator to vary
from Ordinance No 8. Section 8.08(I) allowing the applicant
to have 17 stalls instead of the required of 25 on the
property located at 2352 136th Avenue NW and legally described
as Lot 2, Block 2, Andover Commercial Park.
~
The Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the
conditions established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04.
B. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend
denial of the variance requested by G & R Elevator to vary
from Ordinance No 8. Section 8.08(I) on the property located
at 2352 136th Avenue NW and legally described as Lot 2, Block
2, Andover Commercial Park.
The Commission finds that the proposal does not meet the
requirements set forth in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04. The
Commission finds that no hardship exists due to the unique
shape or topography of the parcel and that the land owner
would not be precluded reasonable use of the property.
C. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may table the item.
o
/"?j}'~::~"..'-"
.~~
'J".J.. .
\. ", ..."----."""~...'
CITY of ANDOVER
Property Address
VARIANCE REQUEST FORM
2 3 5 2 - I 3 6 ~ h A v e n u. e H,';
Leoal Desc~iption of prooertv:
(Fill in whichever is appropriate);
Lot
2
Block
2
Addition
Andover Commercial Park
Plat Parcel PIN
(If metes and bounds, attach the compkete legal)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of Request
We request a variance to provide a total of
17 car parking stalls.
Specific Hardship G&R Elevator employs a total of 8 people. with our
growth projections, we never foresee more than 14 employees. Should
~
the building use change, our proof of parking plan
the requirements of your orOlnance.
Section of Ordinance 8.08 Current Zoning
shows we can meet
G3
-~-------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Applicant
G&R Elevator
Address
2352 136th Avenue N.W., Andover, MN 55304
Signature
2: / /J-ZlSS Phone
780-1600
Home Phone
Date
---------------------------------------------------------------------
?roperty Owner (r~€ O~ne~)
(If di::erent :~om above)
Address
Signatu::e
Z /' ~ess ?hone
Rome ?hone
Date
---------------------------------------------------------------------
,.J
-
, --
'.
I
; -:' )"
~ ,
-....::.....:.........../
ROUND
LAKE
-"-----
),
,
I
. ,
l I
'-11~13 , I
,
,
,
I
I
:
I
I
,
,
'I'
f
II
'- }
'I
I
I
I
",,,-
"'"
,../1//
/t.~
/:./ 'I
,/ " :;~
//"..~.f
'.;/ .,' " ~ L-,
--------/~~III-ITl~..=--- ~~)<""/: I ~ I ~I ;--1
.r-T'-113!43:2,I ! . l/ /-v,0:.' ~ L~'s~ ,I
- :"j- ~~. .' J~_6..)'L >:- ; ~-\r_n_---- - t-f\~ hi:
!)~ i~~2.S ~~7^~; ":, I~ \-. :
kl~;-PUBDIVI.'DN"'~L~@; ~ ~~~~~' V'.\\ : I
~ : '<'>--i.-.O\ l"-lL . ~ '\" CRCFKRID<< . \, I
~- DC'r' ,,-11.z= lOi,;"f;" ", .,u..:J.
_h .. t::..c....., '/-f,,'J'f. ~ ' , " ...\.
F I V /"J .l'<.~ '" o<"'! I $ "
~-1 I-,---r- 1,14 ~I'. _ ~ ~~< ,CST.,ATES, \ ' _ ....
- ,~t-i- .K/ ' :.. II' .:~::,~~~:~~ o\.~"o: "'t' '~ " ',' '" I, " ',":,', " ' . i ' . ~ 'l<
II I-;- V'/= I ,,00 I . -. "".' '" 1 ,. "
II ,'/,//,~ '.- " 0 ~ G~f.f.;' , -~. ,,', ,', !.~" I !~~~- ~<>--"
! I v/' /itP- 'l'oU,cK.s-THOM1'j. ' I . S,;,.fH'S ~/iRUN I f:: y -..'i." ,,.,.;,;.;'
: I .,.'AJXJITION,.;",ol. I~ I "\. _.... .. .;.-; ". s 1"/1' .
\ 10,.,0,0,. , ;-~ ' ,0AIlClfr" . // 0 ,
- ~!:..L.r I " '.i:a:- I 1~tz\tI" "I'H:AODrTfONIZ".'"
- ~ !.'~l~""~:::;':~::;""-' -----~--\T ,~-"', ..>, ,_.., .: >: - - ,...,,1.1.1.1 - ~' ,.~-~ ~it::~~.:t ",;:
\ -.' .' 'L-';;C, ~ __ ~Ii I GO , , '6RTH..ooasoo,...",.I,' '.' ~". . .' ~~'?
J~.: .I' fJ,~' -, ,'~ , d. +,. L OOOOL.AN" ~5f. I .:t~~ """,11 : I -,.,.....,. : '~.'"'.~..: i"i ~:,;;~ r.
.:.::,./.,.- .', ~ -, .".".~. Oil' . -, ''':;~' fJEL:r:-'..r~.57.r;-
~~ 1 :.: .'.I.I~i."i r.r,.. :.1 i~: :~.::,:::.: ' . :'CREEK '.. . G i -r r4Dl!If'plj.r'~ '!.I-I'.~: J ~ '~'ii~:,~o ~: :. ~ 8~ ~
, .'!!'F!/f!, . '.. .~- " , . .. -2NO " ,_" . ... .,.,..../ ,:,;r,~ ~~- ..;>(. 'o"l:!' ~~:J ":', :;- Wh)......
:!1f':..l"..,~..I...... . I ~..:'ygij1if(;Lt' .. "AOO~ ":'~'~' J I .. 1 ,\'~i6X. II rf,~ ';'II(~"i;iJo ,1~A?~~"';4;p:
......,.".,. ;'i;":"~~ .., +.I.'.,......~.. "('IS"- "'47 'oJ.- ,.~~ I ~ 'Pf-..j4.1..~ o' .' ;;;-;:, . 1 .. ~
) .. .,........ I .:; :.:,.,. .", ,> . ,; '. ..~ ..,"7, ~ ~:- '--',l.!7J.1J?i:r: : "-;,:0<'1'~": ~f'i?ALi~:I~,
~ ...,.,.,... - . '. I' -::' ~J'{jj;,y.. """'" -:-:~oooooo__.
.\,O~ .. "'" ."".. = ' , v;....,'>o., . c....:...." '" I . ,,- J,.:'., , . : /."" =on f/o"''q;:' ;: .. . ....- ;
\' . ~ 1'..:1; . ~ WfX)l)LANDCRCEK~ ,-...... fR"i~ 4 .J' ..J::J;,:1,,~ OAK 1'" o. .'"1,,...... ..01) 1 ~
.:-.; ':R;I~ ::;::j I~" ~ - ~-: : . ,,:,:. :;~ ~"".:::.-. ~~'-3"" ~ Q.~;::;'.jJ1 ~r II~\ ~~~O; ; : ~ "/...'Z~".!',~~~
).,.,......~;;;:: i~ ~ '''-''.' I~ _ 1 ',f'" l~ I I I I' ~ j~ --, AD",: I.. : '. '. ~ .
'- /<: ,'I; uX"~ () t1 I. 4 t.un.'" ~ ,~ ;:;:.; It....... 'I', I I \~ ,"":,,,1 "," ;..J~n. .~~
\~L ',(II'. H ~~;,';'" I q 1 I ~ 0- . ". :1 .' -= \ ..'.... . ..
.t = =1 I I fJ!~~ .. ~W)lI-V~.-,I',,!.i.l. ~i~::H'DDlHJ...'.~ i :..~.: cr.~i/lT I i I :.
",l,","'!~ ./7"~ I/.Jl.oBVlEW' . m.,., r"")O"" ,ANDO R . 'I! -'
~I~~;)~;,',I ii' h~: - "'/~ f1 17t-8RAcE;- 'i--I~' ';!A~c'~~~'>' ,~r-'~': .r."-""'".: d: ,.j t-
~''''''':,,'''''''' \:ri;"E"~~. I:./!' .: ;"""~""'" ....,;'..",.!,,,.o-</,.,l:,!4L :
c:u-.:,,; ~~',/; ':;D~ t:1 C;i:] r- ~ I: II. ":=.J ..: \-t~~~ft' ~ ~ H'.".... I~X.: t1..;: ~I..:~~ .3.... : -_
t~~~;~:..:..... ::. ,_;r ~!.I:::: "'<:l:~' ~ ' H" ~cj}fK-~:-!::-/;;~itiJ:. ~ . -;PAR; '._i__,
].... CN.I_US ,L _ NI.c...(l 1010 I3sua ~{/\."r-:i.:in"';"" -ILJI,;\.:.t.r~'
..:. .ul'~..I ';':;':;1 ~~.',. '..'"{f7I...."''' : 'xE1J6'S ,1,00 I ~ '/'iy{..'. ~ I ~:;:J 24 -.'.~' I
.y f.1/fff;=" r-- '''\, ' '.... 4' ",,~, " . ~
>.:.L+:::-I,'.II'~Dd"~'.._I'I.u~c"ir'i~.~ ~ \~ ~~;':':-:.l Asr' '1(1;' ~ -::::"'";J ~': .
~ilI \\L:I",.,,*_lr(',,-T." "~" ~ ,':j::~",_7' . ".< "1~1:!~r; ~ ",..1.,,' -"'<<~',~
_ ...' .WJ~6"J4J"'~; ~::---~ I ._,:'.:~" . '.f'01r;:...~'!.~~~~,.f~'.,,~ ,.~~:~'_ I'
"fiI'i~O.oDL"'~I'" / .'. t::.:1 ~l.~ f7riuNMRf"N~il._ '. ~. gff1.C'..,.,....M;CA~ij,~fjSLC!lND....;::
:'''N. rF:,,~;"'~' ~..;,;....<a:o/~1I1 " /~I"', ' "o:I_~.., I\-J8o-I1."r.I.J';;-8: :::~...";. ~"'.~,."';..::,:
"i~;:;~'~;~~~ ~,/' ~,Yt P:'r:'~~:t.i~t<<l ,;^.::::::~:.:I,ltT; ~J~~~
: ~.. -".~::'iP'-=-L<.,.-,../;J'''''7! . ,lYr' ~4;';"';;'f m-l . .-- .. ,--'" --- '""o..~:"""";'J, -'.-
--(' - CITY , .. ':";:::;:::.~,.; FU:::.i.:.'jD~::.-.!:,i+~.:rC.:. '"
-
~ .
II
LJI
,,-~-P I !
~~NslwTa~ ~ ~ '
111:/'4,1'.""'''',,1... i
! r I CST Ares, .! ' '1'. ....,'1" / ~
1-\ "'~" . 'WX-t',,<''''''' ' -
',1 "" '. ',~,"I"'1 :]~ E::::O,
, ,..1 .
, . 'rw, 'Q~.
, '.~ -: ' ,'.
- ~.o;; l' .' ,
""1" .~
I ,".,"~'V".
. " ~. ' /.:Li1jt;~G "-
~ . ,-....
/\) . ., , " .. ..
: ~ . rITES", ~ .."! Co,:,
>~J2' ...... ;:::"
~~ ~.'"
'.
OENOTES
:;:A
~-)
~-tL
_ ~ AN AREA DEDICA TED FOR ECONOfI;1/C OPPORTUNITIES
. \ ~dover Commercial Park
~-~
~l
/
----.....
----
\
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
co'
,
I,
01
0::,
0'
ul
I
I
:~ : I
I I
10'
I g I
0::1
~ I~I
I;:: ,
I ~ I
1 ,w
ill
I I
I I
POIlO. I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I ~_
)i
I
\
'-J
\ I BUNKER LAKE BLVD. (CO.RD.IIG)
--------------------------------------
. ..-.... ..... .
..................-.....:.;.;.:.;.-.;.;.:.;.:.:.....;.. .. ....
PROPOSED FRONTAGE RD.
N
~
Future
POND
:3
1.8a
100'
}lDTE'/.' L~I- 1/ Bleck :5 Aa.':, kk- so/cP, .bl.L+- +k 'hU.F ',,:>
L/:) \l\i ",.~ "To S<-l\ '-!-t'-L- ~""~
There is a well kept secret in Anoka ;County - a place with a rapidly
growing population, a place where businesses have room to expand.
The City of Andover is a new ~nd exciting place to live and do
business!
,
o
~~g
~g~~
i:1~~l'l
(j
,
,
I
,
,
I
,
,
I
,
,
I
,
,
I
,
f -
I
I
,
I
,
I
,
I
_ l,..:OE~_~.=OllS
Ut":":"=; - - - - - ~
__R__ _~', I~I
- 'l. >, "~'
T, I' I" " '
/, I ',', '"
. .. ...... .q:;,,"
C I ~.~, '\~,:-:~
f ) ( 1 ~', i","
I ~~ : " ~ "
\:11 ~8 :"',
~:;) : " '<y
~ \ \
o
z
. '"
L>
1>,
-,
7~D
.
\ , ;; ~
'''\ r:l
\ -:: 0
,
,
,
\
))
~~
, \
-'j)
zElj
rJ~
r-----~~-
!iil
//
"
'0'
,--.-J
I
,I i I II
II !!!!Il!ll I;". t ,:
; I d!!!!!!! II I ; i ij:: i i j
iu I. I II! 11' I - ,p , .
. I II I III . II' I. 'I 'I I d 'j f
,,~ I I ij dIll : n ;! I ji III ,I ,.! f! 'I J · III '-U'$.
Is 1IIIIWllt!!lll i .H I ~! i I j;ji 'I ! I: I L · ,.......... i; I ;". 111
"" Illll !IIIIIIIII' I IIi !1,1,'1I1J 11111:'1: ,Ill,! II -,' I'I'I!!' Iii I:: I '~I!!! I ! ;1: I
........ " 1 "I' 'II I ., 'j I"I'!' ,I ",'I! I
" I I', I! lqa!ll!,' ,Ill r I dlll'l J! IIi ! I' l !1!!!~:! I j'
1 ! !i III diu ,] 1'1," I', Ill' ,II'
I. " II 'JilIilni
L
~'
~. ""-:~;~.::.i)
(A 'P\ M
'" ~ . k
\ I' '~'. ,_ ,:..~5:t'
'---/ ""=::::,:,::":~/~-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE September 1, 1992
ORIGINATING DE;:PARTMENT ~
Plannlng ~
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
~JM Area 1.0. Sign
~. Hills of Bunker Lake 4th
BY:
AGENDA SECTION Items
NO. 1)iscusslon
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to review the Special Use Permit request
of Tony Emmerich Construction to allow for the continued placement
of an area identification (permanent monument) sign on the
properties located at 140th Lane at the entrance of the Hills of
Bunker Lake 4th Addition, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1 and
Lot 1, Block 5, Hills of Bunker Lake 4th Addition.
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
,- -
The Planning and zoning Commission on December 10, 1991, reviewed
the Special Use Permit request. A motion was made to approve the
Special Use Permit but failed on a 3 yes, 3 no, 1 absent vote.
The item was to go to the City Council meeting on January 7, 1992
with no recommendation. The item was tabled at the Council
meeting while the Planning and Zoning Commission explored the
possibility of amending Ordinance No.8, Section 8.07, Signs.
The Planning and zoning Commission on August 11, 1992 directed the
item be sent back to the City Council with the same motion that
waS made at the December 10, 1991 meeting. Council is asked, at
this time, to make a decision on this matter. Attached for
Council review are the minutes from the December 10, 1991 and the
August 11, 1992, Planning and zoning Commission meeting.
'-~
COUNCIL ACTION
, '
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'-....
/
/
<,
rJ
../
1if\
'@
CITY of ANDOVER
, .-I
PLANllWG AND ZorUNG COMMISSION MEETING - DECEMBER 10. 19Q1
MIllUTES
The Regulae BI-Monthly Meeting of the Andovee Planning and Zoning
Commission was called to oedee by Chalepeeson Randy Peek on December
10. 1991.7:30 p.m.. at the Andovee City Hall. 1685 Ceosstown
Bou1evaed NW. Andovec. Minnesota.
Commisslonees peesent:
Bonnie Dehn. Steve Jonak. Bev
Jovanovich. Mace McMullen. Becky Pease
Maynaed Apel
City Plannee. David Caelbeeg
Assistant City Engineee. Todd Haas
Othees
Commissionees absent:
Als,? peesent:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Novembee 26. 1991: Page 4, thied line, change to: 11.400 squaee-foot
minimum
\
, )
MOTION by Dehn, Seconded by Jovanovich, to appeove the Minutes as
amended. Motion caeeied on a 4-Yes (Peek. Dehn. Jonak. Jovanovich).
2-Peesent (McMullen. Pease). l-Absent (Apel) vote.
cf)
PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PERMANENT MONUMENT SIGN. 140TH
LANE NW AND HANSON BOULEVARD NW. HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE
7:32 p.m. Me. Caelbeeg eeviewed the eequestof Hills. Inc.. to allow
the continued placement of a peemanent moriument sign foe aeea
identification at 140th Lane NW and Hanson Boulevaed NW. Lot 1. Block
1 and Lot 1. Block 5. Hills of Bunke~ Lake 4th AdditIon. The CIty
Council has dieected the Commission to look into the mattee of
Identification signs. In this case, theee is a monument on eithec
side of 140th Lane. though the actual size of the two identification
clecles combined does not exceed 32 squaee feet. the maximum allowed
by Oedinance.
Me. Caelbeeg eeviewed the applicable oedinances, noting Staff sees it
as two sepaeate signs though they ace veey atteactive monuments. The
Commission may considee the monuments as one gate sign. He did not
feel a vaeiance is applicable because of the issue of having to show
haedship. Appaeently theee was a misundecstanding between the
developee and the peeson consteucting the sign as to who was going to
get the peemits. but no Special Use Peemit noe sign peemit weee
obtained in this case. At this time theee is no penalty foe
\ aftee-the-fact pecmits. Me. Caelbeeg also stated the inteepeetatlon
,
~ / of a "development" has been each phase: theeefoee a plat developed in
foue phases would be allowed foue monument identification signs.
..'::;-',0,.._ ....f.
, ,
,)
Pl"'"....19 ;"nd Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - Decembee 10. 1991
Page 2
(Public Heaeing: SUP, Pecmanent Monument Sign, 140th & Hanson. Cont.)
Chalcpeeson Peek did not have a pcoblem with the monument sign on
140th. feeling it does fall within the oedinance: but he was concecned
with having theee identification signs within a distance of fouc
blocks. which is what they now have along Hanson Boulevaed.
Tony Emmeeich. developee - stated the Hills of Bunkee Lake has been
developed in foue sepaeate phases. He stated the'signs on 137th and
138th ace theee only tempocaeily. They will be eemoved when the
nelghboehood business develops out thece. Theee ace sign peemits foe
those signs as pecmanent signs. but again Me. Emmecich stated they ace
wooden signs that will be eemoved.
The heaeing was opened foe public testimony.
,~
Jecey Windschitl. 3640 152nd Lane NW - stated the signs on 140th ace
about as well done as can be done with an enteance sign to a peoject.
He suggested the entice pcocess can be simplified by changing the
oedinance to allow the monument signs. an aetist's deawing and
locations. to be peoposed with the platting peocess. The ARC
Committee could give a eecommendation on the signage when eeviewing
the plat, which would eliminate the peoblem of the signing being
oveclooked. A developee Is teying to peesent as good an image as he
can with theie developments. It is a big investment. so they want
them to be atteactive.
Tony Emmecich - didn't believe an ocdinance can be weitten to covee
all situations, ageeeing that Mc. Windschitl's idea is something that
will eventually have to be done. The City doesn't want to discoueage
nice signs. but all situations can't be coveeed in an oedinance.
Someone,will have to eeview them on a case-by-case basis.
Aftee some discussion. the Commission felt it would avoid a lot of
confusion if the signage of a development would take place at the tIme
of the peeliminaey plat: howevee, they also felt that it is to the
City's benefit to eetain conteol of the signing via a Special Use
Pecmit. Signage would be made a pact of the initial platting
cequieement, and the heaelngs foe the signing Special Use Peemit would
be held at the same time the pceliminaey plat is heaed. Me. Caelbecg
stated the sign pecmit application would then be made a pact of the
development packet.
Theee being no fuethee pUblic testimony, Chaiepeeson Peek asked foe a
motion to close the public heaeing.
-~
MOTION by Pease, Seconded by Dehn. to so move. Motion caeeied on a
6-Yes. l-Absent (Apel) vote.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
\ Minutes - Decembee 10, 1991
. ~ Page 3
(Public Heaeing: SUP. Peemanent Monument Sign. 140th & Hanson. Cont.)
The Commission fiest discussed the specific Special Use Permit
eequest. Chaiepeeson Peek again stated he felt the sign is a single
monument and complies with the ocdinance with cegacd to size. His
main conceen is the tempoeaey signs, as he would like to see a
specific time set as to when those signs will be eemoved. With so
many signs within such a shoet distance. it was his opinion the two
tempoeaey signs actually ace ceal estate signs. He also disag~eed
with the Staff's inteepeetation of a development as being each phase,
peefeeeing to have the numbec of Identification signs limited to one
pee side.
Me. Caelbeeg thought tempoeaey signs ace limited to a life of two
years. Me. Emmeeich again stated he thought the pecmits ace foc
peemanent signs: howevee, they will be cemoved when the Neighbochood
Business peopeety develops. He cannot guaeantee when that will be.
He would like to see those two signs eemain dueing the summee. Theee
is one othee monument foe the development along Bunkee Lake Boulevaed.
Foe the next meeting the Commission dieected Me. Caelbecg to eeseacch
the status of the signs on 137th and 138th as to whethec they have
sign pecmits and whethee those pecmits ace foe tempoeaey oe peemanent
o signs.
Chaiepeeson Peek felt it would be a mistake to gcant a Special Use
Peemit without looking at the existing signage. He didn't think the
intent of the ordinance was to have theee peoject identification signs
within a foue-block acea. Commisslonec McMullen acgued those signs are
ieeelevant to this eequest. They comply with the oedinance. The only
question is whethec the sign on 140th Lane is one sign oe two, and he
believes it is one sign because it falls within the squace footage
eequieementof nomoee than 32 squaee feet. Commissionee Jonak also
felt that it may be bettee to look at all the signs eelating to that
develompent now and eliminate some of them now. Me. Caelbecg
questioned whethec the Commission can requiee Me. Emmeeich to take
down signs that ace peemitted by ocdinance. Some Commissionees felt
he could make that gestuee, but it cannot be eequieed of him.
MOTION by McMullen, Seconded by Pease, that we eecommend adoption of
the Special Use Pecmit and considee the cove cage as one sign based on
the fact that it falls within the 32-squaee-foot eequieement. The
Peemit is to allow foe the continued placement of a peemanent monument
aeea identification sign on peopeety located at 140th Lane NW and
Hanson Boulevaed NW desceibed as Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 5,
Hills of Bunkee Lake Foueth Addition.
The Commission finds the eequest meets the ceiteeia established in
-, Oedinance No.8. Section 5.03, Including: the use will not be
~ detelmental to the health, safety. moeals oe geneeal welface of the
community: the use will not cause secious tcaffic congestions oc
hazacds: the use will not depeeclate sucroundlng propeety: and the use
Is in hacmony with the Compeehensive Plan.
o
Plar..,..~g and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - Decembee 10, 1991
Page 4
(Public Heaeing: SUP, Peemanent Monument Sign, 140th & Hanson, Cont.)
(Motion continued)
The Commission also finds that the eequest meets the ceiteeia
established in Oedinance No.8. Section 8.07. The PeLmit is
contingent upon the following conditions in accoedance with Sections
8.07 and 5.03:
1. The aeea foe development is laegee than 5 acees.
2. Theee shall be only 1 sign pee development.
3. The maximum squaLe footage of the sign is 32 squaee feet In
aeea.
4: The sign is located 10 feet feom any peopeety line.
5. The Special Use Peemit shall be subject to annual eevlew by
Staff .
6. Theee shall be a maintenance ageeement foe the monument.
DISCUSSION: Commissionee McMullen stated the decision when dealing
with othee signs in the futuee may depend upon the discussion as to
whethee oe not to make a change to the oedinance. He was not willing
to add a clause eelative to the existing signage.
:_-)
VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Dehn, McMullen. Pease: NO-Jonak. Jovanovich.
Peek: ABSENT-Ape 1 . Motion failed. The item will go to the City
Council on Januaey 7, 1992, with no eecommendation. 8:17 p.m.
The Commission then discussed possible changes to the Sign Oedinance.
Chaicpeeson Peek again stated he felt it is a mistake to look at
additions as developments. that the entice development should be
eegaeded as one and allow one sign pee feontage. Anothee issue is
whethee the squaee footage ot the monument itself should be addeessed.
Seveeal Commlssionees ageeed with the one sign pee feontage, not pee
phase of the development.
Me. Wlndschltl - stated they ace cequieed to have multiple accesses
to theie developments. The signs give the neighboehood an identify as
to wheee they live, feom an appeaeance standpoint, in giving
dicections to othees. and in how to distinquish it feom othee
developments. Monuments foe. developments have only been used in
Andovee foe the last five yeaes oe so, and they ace expensive to put
up. They tey to put them at the main points of inteeest. By looking
at the total signage at the time of the plat, It can be deteemined
how many ace needed and wheee they should be located.
~
Me. Windschitl went on to say that the Sign Ocdlnance has been the
most confusing ovee the yeaes, eithec veey steictly enfoeced oe veey
leniently enfoeced at any given time. He also noted that each phase
ofa pceliminaey plat is consideLed a sepaeate legal entity, often
sold to and developed by someone othee than who oeiginated the
pceliminaey plat. And that development is entitled to a monument.
P...:... ..:g
Minuces -
Page 5
:;,ng Commission Meeting
J~~emcec 10. 1991
,
'. )
(Public Heaeing: SUP.Pecmanent Monument Sign. 140th & Hanson. Cent.)
Foc the next meeting. the Commission dieected Staff to addcess one
identification sign pe~ feontage eathec than pee development phase: to
eeseacch the definition of what a development is: and to eeseaech the
coeeelation between platting and the application foe a Special Use
Peemit foe a sign. Staff was asked to check with the City Attocney to
cecommend a peoceduee foc the signage and platting pcocess. 8:37 p.m.
SKETCH PLAN - WEYBRIDGE
Me. Haas ceviewed the Andovee Review Committee's comments on the
pcoposed Weybeidge sketch plan. a development pcoposing 147 lots in an
R-4. Single Family Ueban disteict. off Andovee Boulevaed bocdeeing the
eaileoad teacks.
,
)
Je~rv Wlndschitl - explained all of the paccels will be eligible foc
sanitaey sewee and will be eezoned In the platting pcocess. He also
explained the ceasons for some of the changes of this plan from the
ociginal pcelimina~y plat. Vale Stceet NW was made a stcalght ~oad
to accommodate a change in the sanitacy sewe~ plan. as the consulting
enginee~s p~efec to extend the trunk sewec line noeth along that coad.
Some of the items ace paet of an agceement he made with the City as
pact of the negotiating pcocess when Creek View Ceossing was
developed. The nurnbee of enteances to the park cemain the same. but
they have been moved because of the adjoining plat and the change in
the location of the sewer line. The pack dedication Is consistent
with what was in the oelglnal plat.
Me. Windschitl also stated the. City allowed the outlots on the east
.slde of Xeon when that plat was flnaled without holding public
heaelngs. Noemaily it would be requlced that those cemenant paecels
be attached to the adjoining lot: howevec. he does not own those
cemanent paccels and has no conteol ovee them. Ideally, theee would
be identification signs. placed at each road. The peopeety will be
developed in phases. He explained the Commission may be seeing moee
phased developments that ace sma I lee becuase of the new state law that
taxes undeveloped lots the full amount immediately. In the past they
had theee yeaes befoee a lot was taxed fully. That will have a
deamatic effect on the platting pcocess.
Me. Haas stated he has asked Anoka County foe an opinion on the
enteance of Vale Steeet onto ACSH 16 due to its close proximity to the
Burlington Northeen Rai1coad tcacks. He has not yet ceceived a
response. The ARC Committee Is also suggesting the bubbles be
eliminated feom the vaeious intecsectlons, as they cause the deiveways
to be veey close togethee and ace difficult to snow plow.
~.J
~
Planning Commission Meeting
August 11, 1992 - Minutes
Page 4
(Variance, G&R Elevator, Cont.)
applicant is to comply with Paragraphs A, B, and C of Ordinance
8, Section 8.08 (I), Paragraph 28.
6J
Motion carried unanimously.
Discussion - Area Identification Sign - Emmerich
-'
\
\J
Mr. Carlberg explained that this item has been waiting until
~rdinances 8 & 10 were amended regarding permanent monument
signs. Council did approve the amendments and the process will
now be that the Special Use Permit for the signs will be
submitted with the preliminary plat. The Andover Review
Commi ttee will look at. the signs. One sign per development is
allowed and any additional signs will be reviewed by the Andover
Review Committee who will make a recommendation to the Planning
Commission who will make a recommendation to the City Council.
Commissioner Peek asked what the criteria for allowing additional
signs will be. Mr. Carlberg noted that the Review Committee is
working on that now. Size of the development will be a major
consideration along with separation of signs.
Mr. Carlberg asked if the Commission wants the Emmerich sign to
go to the Council with the same motion and vote as it did in
December of 1991. The Commission agreed that it should go back
with the same motion and vote.
Other Business
. '\
,,-j
Discussiori was on the junkyards and whether they should be
allowed to build buildings and keep their yards the same size or
build buildings and reduce the size of the yards. Mr. Carlberg
noted that the city attorney said that we could require that the
yard sizes be reduced over a number of years.
Commissioner Pease explained that a while ago, the city would not
allow several of the junkyard owners to replace an existing sign
with a new one. She questioned whether we could allow them to
build new buildings if we wouldi't allow them to replace a sign.
A work session with the owners of the junkyards will be scheduled
by City Staff at a regular meeting.
It was suggested that the inspections of the junkyards take place
earlier in the year to allow them time to make any modifications
or repairs before the license renewals went to the City Council.
Variances for decks encroaching on the sideyard setback were
discussed as these requests have been increasing because builders
put patio windows on the side of houses and then there is only 10
~~
\
'J
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
'J
--:.--.::-' '
".::;:-..:-;,<.
-:
.. -:..
!
I
I
I
,
~ :../
~ ~ I 1 :J6..]{J
:. 'rt--.,-..... ~ S~.41 "'~?9";?47S'Jr {J16.{J9...
~ I -,: 85.41
:s; ; ........, . S~ 41
..,J I : I', 0 ~ ~ f 111.49
CXl ! . ...1. "'" C __--;. f-'-___.. q ;1<'15/
~ :c:.1 . I ;~ ',. ._-1' I I 1 -, r--.
'<;. '0 Q). I'" '~I- "'ff I...: I I, """_____
~ !'~I ~I' I~ ~,I . . " f", . ' , "': " -
::"J ~ / --.. 2 - 3~. ~. ,..,. 4 Clll,~ 5 }".. '
~ ,,",, c.' '-, :t, ;<c ;.,. :>-:..", ." .~ .~
~ t ! ! I C::u t~ OJ 0 \")'I'-:ti .... :"-::.)5 6 ~
~ : I ~, ,.: ,~ :-, ':" ~. '." .: ~ ,,". "
..... I , ..9~ ~. ::0: ~'I; ....I.~ ;::. ~":.~:... ..... I
.... \ '"' .. '. , > I . ,'.' . '/ ... ....;.. I
. . ., . I I '. .,.... ".
~:;. , : r . ; ./. O:~: . I' .'"::' - I
. J. '~:I .:"".'::' :'
. '. ' - , .-' : I: .: ' - - :: ::':" : I: n 4';: 'I.; ~ -,'
.....-- ~"'~' 6~::':"=:-"": ~-""--.l~~'-" - ~\ .;.
--~. ---.. ., _., " ,'->._.~:'.'-.,.
... - T .. _ _'.
' "I '~J"",
N33'';9;2';+, J';O,QO __-='-4_'6''';'4';''0 ~........:..::
- - - - - -/40 ~H- :;:1 '!: ?'iO:.7~ ~
l. 9".c~ '0 ",
'9C!-~ ;~o:fQ~ ra5,7r-:rF~3C'8 ~':~~4~
' .- ,: - r , ; : .1, I :.' ''''';'''::1
I I I I I I I C f". _:~,.---..
! t.,: : :-'~II r''''~:,: ~",;; 'j 91:
t i~ 2 il'!! 3 ~:!~ 4 ;:'I,f~ {~)/ ~~ i'
.....: ./", .... .~ Cot ;- ,. .'. III; 5 .oJ) , <%" ! /..
- I ,- Q. I ., .. ~ .... '~ .~ I 1'", 6 ~ I
-1 J I' ~ . ......,....... ..... ,...- : I 7
:;. : ; ~; , =<:; ; ~"~,: '; j , . ;;:1" ~' .>' ':']:Ii
;~~ L.__.1Q(.-.i: a~.}~ L.2~;'3 "'~ l.. . , , :: :~;5' F-'/:;-:
; I -1- t, S 89"49'l2.E 300.00-- '.....:C?-!,'f,~: f',)! :;/:,',/'. .'r;
I 0/ I ". .>... .' . .-~.:;
i I I j .'. ....;...; rc?~. ":;?- J ~:l.. ;'~I/ _
;f:'1-51~.--,<c?c. :~se~~.~::'" I, ~~.~ '~:,)~(>..,:?_" ; ;)'3
I ! ::or 0::, No). 356':5". _c?,.>~
· -i ---- 1______ . ~~,. "~,'>_,-::.-:;;;
._..../ I ~ > I , '" ' '~'=-..._
. -- , "'::::'C
. '..."
( 'I'N. Ccrrer " '..11. .: \
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r ,
~.'
.
~,--
"
. .
to_...
........
"'.'....
I
I
I
I
I
c:::-
",
.......
" '
".....~
.......
.....'
.......
, .
, "
'Y'
~..... ~
."":,..
,-
'"
.',
. .
'.'
, .'
... ..
.::.
c.....
r:':-
"
'..-"
....-
I....
.
c:S
(/ ~
(QI
C\.II
..; I
"I'..
UlO'l
Viti
:::0'1
."-
~
Ul
'3~
'1"
-,.,
.~~
3:'"
:i.~
"
-:50
~~
--. .
.-
'-:..
-.,
.....
:-,
~-'
3:
1\1..
--
.)
~D
-,
p
,. a'
'" a
g ~
',~
'"
,.,
.
--~---
~
,
~
:2~
1(';
~
-J'
J'
\
\
-z..
\':)
m
.
o
m_
~
~
,
"::!
.
;
..:.
CITY OF ANDOVER
o
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1~ 1992
ITEM
NO.
Eldorado Street Right-
Of-way Acquisition
BY:
Jim Schrantz
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
The City Council is requested to decide if the City should buy
the southern part of the right-of-way for Eldorado Street.
We have talked to the DNR and we were told that the DNR is going
to deny the permit.
Nedegaard Construction has an agreement from Rosella Sonsteby
giving them a option on the crossing right-of-way until September
30, 1992.
See attached letter.
/
,~
COUNCIL ACTION
r'
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'-
~)
'\
'-,...J
\
'-)
NEDECiAAR,D CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
1814 NORTHDALE BLVD. mON RAPIDS,MN. 55433 (612) 757-7$6
Minnesota Licensed Contractor - ID#0002068
June 16, 1992
- EC E\ V-Ef'
H jUN 171992 U
Jim Schrantz
city of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.N
Andover, Minnesota 55304
,-
CITY OF ANDOVER
Dear Jim:
I am writing to inform you that I have received from Ms.
Rosella Sonsteby a written extension of the option to purchase
the Eldorado crossing, which option has now been extended to
September 30, 1992. If the City has any interest in exercising
this assumption, please advise me.
DPN/ja
Q
..,., ue.eER CI THE
"~8JLDERSASSOQA11CH
CUSTOM HOMES
REMODELING LIGHT COMMERCIAL
@\"""""
~'
''),
\.':.
\\
ij
i,'
, )\,..l~
'---' ,",c.,,,,,,",
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
September 1, 1992
Discussion Item
Engineering
ITEM
NO.
..s:
Pheasant Glen Assessmen
Discussion BY:
Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to discuss the storm sewer that is
proposed to be constructed as part of Pheasant Meadows (Project
92-10) and Pheasant Glen (Project 92-16) subdivision.
"
As you know, Pheasant Meadows has been approved but
unfortunantely the Pheasant Glen (Hurst property) has not been
submitted as a preliminary plat. The storm sewer in question has
been designed to carry runoff from both properties. By drainage
area, Pheasant Glen has an approximate benefit of $24,245 and
Pheasant Meadows has a benefit of $27,140. The City did not hold
a hearing for the Hurst property because the City had felt the
two plats were going to be done as 1 project but they will not.
Hokanson Development would be interested in paying for the entire
storm sewer but Hokanson is requiring that if the Hurst property
develops that they be reimbursed by the City and the City would
at that point assess the Hurst property for their benefit of the
storm sewer.
'--
Attached is a letter from Hokanson Development agreeing to this
method of assessment.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'- - .
'"
/ "
\_.-J
"
'J
, "
',j
i(""-'~
~.,,;;" :;; ;
HOKANSON DEVELOPMENL iNC.
HOKANSON DEVELOPMEN I. INC.
HOKANSON DEVELOPMEN"f, INC.
August 27, 1992
To: Honorable Mayor and Andover City Council
From: Hokanson Development Inc.
Re: Pheasant Meadows improvements
It has come to our attention by Andover staff that the storm sewer
for the Pheasant Meadows development is to serve to collect runoff
from the property to the north as well. Since the property to the
north is not yet ready to develop, we would propose covering the
cost of the public storm sewer improvement benefitting it if we can
be reimbursed for those costs once it is developed.
The agreement between the city and Hokanson Development Inc. is
called a deferred assessment agreement and will cost the city no
money. It has been used in numerous cities. In Coon Rapids, for
example, it was used between Jim stanton and the city and
watershed. Mr. Stanton completed initial stormwater ponding and
other public improvements and received compensation from
benefitting developments when they were assessed.
This appears to be the best means of getting the project known as
Pheasant Meadows initiated this year. It will also make the
development to the north easier to complete as one less public
improvement will be required.
9174 Isanti Street N.E., Blaine, Minnesota 55434
(612) 786-3130 Fax (612) 784-9136
.,-)
~
:~
CONCEPT DRAFT:
DEFERRED ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
The City of Andover hereby agrees to compensate Hokanson
Development Inc. for improvements benefitting the property known as
Lot 5, Watts Garden Acres Addition, Anoka county, Minnesota.
Compensation shall occur through the assessment procedure once
development is initiated on Lot 5, Watts Garden Acres Addition,
Anoka County, Minnesota.
Hokanson Development Inc. shall incur no additional charges in
recouping costs of public improvements benefitting Lot 5, Watts
Garden Acres Addition, Anoka county, Minnesota.
CITY OF ANDOVER
, \
o
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION I q,.-;
SePT ,1/7 L
ll.1.lg1.l.t 18, 1992
DATE
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
NO. Staff, Committee, Comm. Admin.
ITEM Agreement/Wiatrak v.
NO. James Lund Const.
BY:
Jim Schrantz
The City Council is requested to approve the attached Settlement
Agreement that was part of the Wiatrak v. James Lund
Construction, et al. court case. The City was represented by our
insurance companies attorney George Hoff of Hoff and Allen.
George Hoff recommended a settlement.
The agreement limits the buildability of the lot to 6,000 square
feet with soil boring on each corner of the pad.
11t5LEn To ~ /; J99~
'---"
BILe WIt.L
fJ-€i REEme?JT
ExPLApV
/J- / 7~
YilE: 5e77CEme?7./1
;1Jee:7/N't; r
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
; " TO
~
SECOND BY d
~ ~rr I~
'- ---'
r ,
,.J
",j
'\
-...J
LAW OFFICES Of"
Rurke oud Jlowkius
JOHN M. BURKE
WILLIAM G, HAWKINS
SUITE 101
2ncOON RAPlOS BOuLEVARO
COON ....PlDS. MINNESOTA ~!l<l33
PHONE Ull 21784-21198
\
.--
0E1:E1VEn
"(MAY 7 1992 7U
~-
CITY OF ANDOVER
May 4, 1992
Mr. Stephen Nash
Babcock, Locher, Neilson & Mannella
llS'Main Street
Anoka, MN 55303
Re: Wiatrak v. James Lund Construction, et al.
Court File No. C9-90-4707
Dear Mr. Nash:
Enclosed please find a draft copy of a Settlement Agreement
between the City of Andover and James Lund Construction. This
pertains to our discussions held on the day of trial whereby the
City would issue building permits for construction of homes on
three lots which currently would be considered unbuildable. I
believe the agreement accurately reflects our discussions. If
it is agreeable, please advise and I will have the agreement
placed into final form.
Sincerely,
William G. Hawkins
Andover City Attorney
WGH:mk
Ene.
cc: Mr. James E. Schrantz
, \
'-- )
,
,,J
-J
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF ANOKA
TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
----------------------------- CASE TYPE: CIVIL/PROPERTY DAMAGE
Stephen P. Wiatrak,
Court File No. C9-90-4707
Plaintiff,
',vs.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
James Lund Construction, Inc.,
a Minnesota corporation; James
Lund; City of Andover, a
Municipal corporation; and
Douglas Maciaszek,
Defendants.
-----------------------------
WHEREAS, the undersigned are parties to the above
captioned lawsuit; and
WHEREAS, Lund Construction, Inc. also has before the
City of Andover that certain plan known as Lund's Evergreen
Estates 5th Addition (hereinafter 5th Addition) which is subject
to a Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to settle the foregoing
matter with the Plaintiff and also settle certain areas of
dispute between them with respect to the 5th Addition;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY AGREE AS
FOLLOWS:
1. That the provisions' of paragraph 1 of Exhibit A
shall be satisfied with respect to Lots 1 and 2, Block 3 and Lot
4, Block 2, in the 5th Addition, by James Lund Construction,
-1-
, \
J
"
,..J
, )
Inc. providing a building pad on the site with a minimum area of
6,000 square feet, at finished grade, with a minimum width of
100 feet and minimum depth of 60 feet. Within the building pad
area, there shall be sufficient area for the location of a
septic tank. The area within the building pad and septic tank
area shall be shown by survey prepared by a registered surveyor
and shall be staked on the lot. All construction of structures
shall be done within the building pad, with septic tank
constructed within the septic tank area.
Lund Construction,
Inc. shall cause to be recorded against Lots 1 and 2, Block 3
and Lot 4, Block 2 a restriction, running with the land,
restricting construction of the structure to the building pad
area and the tank to the septic tank area. Said restriction to
be in a form approved by the City Attorney for Andover.
The City shall be provided with a soil boring at each
corner of the building pads and one soil boring from the septic
tank area to a depth of 25 feet and certification by a
registered engineer other than James Lund or an employee of
James Lund or Lund Construction, Inc. or Merila & Associates,
Inc. that the area within the building pad and septic tank area
and the soils thereunder are suitable for intended construction.
The agreement set forth herein shall have no binding
effect on the City's consideration, administration or
interpretation of the remaining provisions of Exhibit A or the
Ordinances of the City of Andover, including without limitation
Ordinances 10 and 37.
"
-2-
''\
~..J
, "
'......./
\
....J
- . .
2. James Lund and Lund Construction, Inc. hereby
jointly and severally, agree to defend and indemnify the City of
Andover, its officers, agents and employees from any and all
claims which may be brought against them related in any way to
the soil conditions in the 5th Addition, on Lots 1 and 2, Block
3, and/or Lot 4, Block 2.
3. Except as modified in Paragraph 1 above the
Developer's Agreement between the parties remains in full force
and effect.
CITY OF ANDOVER
LUND CONSTRUCTION, INC.
By
Its Administrator
By
Its President
James Lund
-3-
CITY OF ANDOVER
~
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
NO. Staff, Committee, Comm. Engineering
September 1, 1992
ITEM
NO.
Approve Hidden Creek
East Park Concept Plan
BY:
Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the attached concept
plan for Hidden Creek East Park and the construction of a class V
parking lot to be located at the north end of the park from 135th
Lane NW in the Hidden Creek East Park as requested by the Park
and Recreation Commission.
Background Information Leading Up To This Point
',~
July 23, 1992 - Regular Meeting
The Park and Recreation Commission has met on site at Hidden
Creek East Park with area residents. The residents were
concerned with the park being developed as having league play.
There are 2 groups wanting the park, but they have different
ideas on how the park should be developed.
August 6, 1992 - Regular Meeting
The Park and Recreation Commission met with one of the groups and
John Peterson of Good Value Homes to discuss a compromise for the
park. It was generally agreed that if a parking lot was to be
constructed that the parking lot be constructed with the
development of the Hidden Creek East 5th Addition which will
eliminate the possibility of discussing in the future where the
parking lot should go if it is not constructed.
August 20, 1992 - Regular Meeting
The Park and Recreation Commission has recommended approval of
the concept plan which includes: an open space area for soccer,
baseball, softball, volleyball, etc.; playground area; walkways
in the park; and a parking lot located at the north end of the
park. It is also recommended by the Commission to construct the
parking lot this fall with the development of the 5th Addition.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
',-,
. \
'--)
\
'./
\
"',.,/
ANDOVER PARK COMMISSION
REQUEST FOR PARK RECOMMENDATION
August 20, 1992
ITEM
~. Hidden Creek East Park
Plan Recommendation
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
BY: Todd J. Haas
/
The Park and Recreation Commission is requested to recommend
approval of the concept plan for Hidden Creek East Park to
the. City Council.
The Commission should recommend to the City Council the
construction of a parking lot this fall in the Hidden Creek
East 5th Addition so as not to cause problems in the future
with the neighborhoods. If you recall from the last meeting
that John Peterson of Good Value Homes did not have a problem
with the construction of the parking lot.
The Commission could recommend a parking lot which will be
for 10 vehicles. If the parking is not adequate in the
future, the City could expand the parking lot as there is
sufficient area to do this.
, '\
o
o
to
- --::
,~..
....
:.1-'
~:&I
. "'"'
:;:.~ I
I
60
.
;:
.
Z
r
-1
., ;:
, ::)
;8t~1-
. ,~'j~
. '-./ -, ~ c::
i~~:
!
~ -,- ,
~o':"".~<:J' _ '
- . -.. .
--------..
-
"""
.........
"""
UNDEVELOPED 135TH
<0:-
-.- 10
<DC::
mO
:3 0 z
0
0 L - 145.00 - _
0
, WE;:ST
:., ': 33..3.0
tn
CD
c)
to
to
w
~ !=J!.
=> !~,.
o
U)
o
o
z
IA
149.70
WEST
2
o
o
g L
-
./
/
/
aEC~Vtf- -------
nl~C'i ! :, 1992 - l,U "
I "._ WEST
I CITY Of ANDOVER 41},:~...
I I
I I
I I
I
1- I
,010
41~C:r\ = 2.0 FEET
(AP?ROX) I
I I
I I
C8:: S 45000'OO"W
R=20.00 I
1::::.=90000'00"
, \ L=31.42 I
0.4 I
;./, WEST
! i 160PO I .~300~J~
T f '- .... ..... ..;
....- . ..' '. .' : WEST
:) ...., i :
:..... 143.00 ....."
:.~~.oo PAR K WEST I
'!! ISO.04
r--------
g
~
l
'-
149.37
WE: ST
3
-.......
.........
.........
......
"'CB=N6904I'5S"
R = 330.00
....6.= 12053'55"-
,.- :. L = 74.29
.
.
.........
---
"er
,"'~
::i..J..J
",Lt)
__0
"'.-
Lt)~
-/Y)
-
.;::
UNWAN-
,.;
'~ .
.
\
Be:NC~
~ P\......c.ss
...
~~'
WEST
!()
CD
cri
!()
111
;1.i
/'
1/ O?.=N ~P-kif
t 1J-~~i';'17$"~:r";A"'"
C<:;ut// 'fA. T/ t..I;? if (INS
.4.e~~ 11oIc.t.uPE:
. .. If
B".'5E.4;1II, 5~WIztI("
~~"I VOlleyha./f
G~T.) ,='
134
....
-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1992
ITEM Approve Purchase of
NO'8. Tandem Trailer
BY:
Frank Stone
@
BY
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Staff, Committee, Comm.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Public Works
The City Council is requested to approve the purchase of a tandem
24 foot trailer for Parks from Tailwind Trailers of Elk River.
We have 3 quotations for a 24 foot tandem trailer for Parks to
haul the toro mowers.
Crystal welding, Inc. $5,900.00
Scharbers, Rogers, MN $5,200.00
Tailwind Trailers, Elk River, MN $3,884.00
'-
Kevin Starr and myself have been to Tailwind Trailers in Elk
River. Their trailer is built very well and we recommend the
purchase from them at $3,884.00, plus tax of $252.46 and license
of $100.00 for a total of $4,236.46
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
,r- TO
',-
SECOND BY
@\~<
~'"
'-.~~.
~\~
~~
J
O~,c:-,,:-=-..c-;,,:P'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
staff, Committee, Comm
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Public Works
September 1, 1992
Equipment Purchases fo
~ 1992 Capital Equipment
Frank Stone
R
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ITEM
NO.
The City Council is requested to approve the change of equipment
purchases for the 1992 Capital Equipment.
Due to the increase of equipment costs I have had to change the
equipment purchases for the 1992 Capital Equipment list. I have
removed the hot box and put it first in the 1993 Capital
Equipment Budget. I have in return added the toro replacement to
the 1992 Capital Equipment Budget. Again with Mayor and Council
approval Public Works will stay within the amounts of
certificates that were sold.
, \
'--
Tandem Truck, Plow, Wing and Sander
One (250) 4x4 Pickup & Plow
Bobcat (New)
One Toro (New)
One Replacement Toro (Less Trade In)
One Tandem Trailer Parks (No Trade)
$95,000.00
$18,700.00
$17,000.00
$14,000.00
$14,000.00
$4,800.00
Total
Tax
$162,500.00
$10,562.50
TOTAL
$173,062.50
"
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
'--
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1992
Non-Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT n
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
BY: Ci ty Planner
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ITEM
NO.
tJ.
Order Ad for Bids
Make-up Air System
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to direct Staff to
advertise for bids for a make-up air system for the Andover Senior
Center. The Uniform Mechanical Code requires a make-up air system
be installed. The make-up air system will include a hood for the
stove, duct work, etc.
'--
"
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
'--
CJ
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
..;~:::.:~'t".,<'j'
DATE September 1. 1992
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ~ IJ )
Building ~
FOR
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
staff, Committee, Comm
ITEM
NQ~ Sidewalk @ City Garage
/
'---
"
MOTION BY
TO
'--
BY: D. L. Almgren
A sidewalk needs to be constructed from the new city garage to
connect to the existing sidewalk in front of City Hall. This is
an added expense because the Park Board did not want the garage
located on the north end of the City Hall parking lot.
The cost of the new walk is $875.00 (6' wide x 81' long = 486
S.F. x 1.80/s.f. = $875.00).
This walk will also serve the Public Works equipment for travel
between the Public Works building and hockey rinks without them
going on a county road.
I believe the extra cost for this walk should corne out of park
funds.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1992
ITEM
NO.
Schedule Public Hearing
Budget BY:
Jim Schrantz
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
NO.
Staff, Committee, Comm. Admin.
The City Council is requested to set a date for the public budget
hearing and a reconvening meeting date.
Attached are the dates that the County and School District have
already taken.
Note: The hearing must be held between November 30 and December
21.
0'
"-
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
'-."
'-
COUNTY OF ANOKA
DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATION
Edward M. Treska, Property Tax Administrator
August 17, 1992
COURTHOUSE. 325 EAST MAIN STREET. ANOKA. MN 55303
(612) 421-4760
The Honorable, Ken
Mayor of Andover
l685 Crosstown Blvd
Andover, MN 55304
Orttel
NW
:j
Dear Mayor Orttel:
The Truth in Taxation law, M.S. 275.065 requires cities to
hold a public budget hearing for property taxes payable in
the year 1993. The dates for this hearing cannot conflict
with the public hearing and continuation dates set by the
county or the school districts located in your city. These
hearings must be held between November 30 and December 21.
The following taxing districts within your city have set the
following hearing dates:
TAXING HEARING
DISTRICT DATE
Anoka County..............December
School District #ll.......December
School District #15.......December
RECONVENING
DATE
8.......December 15
14.......December 2l
14.......December 17
With this information you can now set the initial date for
your public hearing and a date for recommencing the meeting,
if necessary. In addition, the time and location of the
initial meeting, the phone number an interested taxpayer may
call and your payable 1993 certified proposed property tax
levy is due on or before September 15, 1992. I have
enclosed a certification form for your convinience.
If you have any questions concerning Truth in Taxation,
please contact Dick Sivanich at extension 1136.
Sincerely,
~$f ;;:JL
Edward M. Treska ~
Director of Property Tax Administration
",J
EMT:JRS:se
Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Emplover
AA' """"
~...~"'
"~
""').
'\\
H
\ ;~
1/
.f -'j ~~~ _~/jl
''---../ ,::--:~:,/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1992
ITEM 168th Lane E. of
~. Round Lake Boulevard
~
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Non-Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to authorize a speed study be done
along 168th Lane NW between Round Lake Boulevard NW (CSAH 9) and
Verdin Street NW (County Road 59).
Comments:
For your information, 168th Lane NW is designated as a Municipal
State Aid Street which was recently constructed. The design
speed is 35 MPH but the City can not post the speed limit until
MNDOT does a speed study and has authorized the speed limit.
,
'-
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
'-.
. ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
::l u ~ ~ 0 ~ ~
. ~ ~ 0 ~
" " ~ 0 z z ~
u ~ . N ~ X ~ " ~ ~ ;;;
-
<II en III
W ~
~ ~ ~
:;;
~
~
~
~
o
z
,.
-~
"
.
"
~
-~-;-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :
~ ~ g W 0 ~ ~ 0
~ ~ 5 ~ ~ S !; ~
Ci~Y OF ,OAK GROV ; ANOl-"';.4 >..v.
~Ui-
o
" z
" w
. >
~ .
~ "
. ~ I 'i.'" l~ I' I ~t!:.'~ I ~,:
~ '?J' r ,I ': !,D I I - i j
, I :il~?7l~~ ! I I_I,
: ::&l@f;HlfL '
,'''f{,,!~Ar.is I ! I I
- - '- _ ';:CqNO-j JAoa, I I : RLS "".7 ,
.P". 'N.KJIIOMARK' # _. i
"'"- ~ (,,,. I
" <'i-'" Ii I DA~E}.r:- ...,L..:- I
./ I /'-" ._;<. I
.,;,..: _"f
'1),,1 j-;" Ii, ~'EN~ I -I' ~ ' I
: ,Y _ACReS J-
~ J-.J:.':'/ I . i I .~v ~- :'~~: I
~' ' ,,-- , ,-.-~- - -(- ill I . ,j}~,
H'L . ,/ ' i V-EO \ D '0'1 N I ".' 1.:'"
'.7. t- ,2'~<,-' 'Ii' I I J . 'o~/\"\'l..'.. . ,I(' -""'- []'I
+[i,' ;\~~r S,' .' h : 1,1,',:: " I "'I f 'l/' I', J\'::,~ 2'1~i~'S'~~' ... II ,~;~\'-;
-r-= - , I Il~m~" .,'It', - -+ ~ (~$J_ " , .,_ ~ t,
, ~!l /,....41-\'('.. . 13' i'; " . ' . . ';.l:~ 'gi 'm o'7ii:.,r} oiv. ' '\' I "!" I ' (;~'I' . -;-'
....1 ' . J~.F"'CEbAR CoRk>,.;.I.I"'11 ~.i5t~ / .."':. PINE.-t!Clt.CS. I I I I '.I., ~., ~'I ,~~O" ,V ;,\ r- ~'
,C\ ~, . , ')':YO '."'" '. .. ""0 Ins oo~"; 12 . ~,
"~;:;, """""E.,,,,'A~.~... '1"""'1, l~~; ". ""':Aoo' I I I '~ ~-I., we, I" 'oil)G~Y I . Ilf'~ . ,'. '
. ~ ~ I 'CEOA:' CRES ! STAr61 . , . 'i. '" 2NO," ." ! r I ." "'tI ~:s ~ , ~ \ , I
: ,.",',j"_.".i-;<'",,",' ~,,,,"-,,i,!_L:_ :.: '".., :.:",""",:.. _ _u-L" _ __' _' __ ~. , L~~L~J ~rr-.l, ,,' "f~"
, ' ~. 2' , . I VAL'E VIFWI'!'" / - - - - '{' , - - - - - - - - - - /, J' - \! " H '.1 ",.._
',' J ~ 's'i .F,Swi,'s:' .!. 4.1 j i ~\' " ". ..' r::':;~"
.~ ::~~~f'_:' -:; : l~lL --> -- ____ JLu- =lm- m::i-: ________ i _:_,;_i;;
f-;- ~1 -st.4'1:E." , _, 6 I .., I I II' I '~~AK~O,~\ ' ...:!:. 9liNTi Y.
\ -- L:-I':' '. I.. SYt.~smf ~ :..8 c-
.' ~., I ADDITION I 2, E'rS"IA T(S.., . J '<'-"'ATt=:s'.
\:.,i. 'M ;4a . , , , . ~' . ' ','. ..... i';"~ . T
:'\\'. " ""'''~' ' ~ ,,' VPR1IRIE.1 .21 . ~l-r ,I '1I"~oU'C '2 j' I .
/ -', ;,>;"~ PINE I "
i'0'\'J'.T.~ I'CREST'I' , '4 "M'MEAQOWS3:, . ~O'{)/T!ON' 3' 'I~
WWI I I i I I: I I /, I iUNoS.I'.:v~Rq.'1EfNi2. I ,
goGt~ 8 I ~",I I ci 'ESTAf.:.;is'I!J'5TH' ,g'l
lD I ~v I I ~ I L 1"0; J n "IJ-..:... ,4 .;
... '" I - ,~" ,>,---,11','
,II I " i - , I ' ;"G~~ I - . ' .
II" I I I ' "='Sf':.J. ' AOO, I
I I II '~ ' ' :J~~-.....II / I !
: I'r--~I,: ~ ~~"I;' *i~1::I!rf: ' II
I ~ ~~ .-1/
I I ~'(f~I~- ~ I ;00" 1: , ,
-,~~~ I ,I 91~
i/ ~~ ' ,I I I \~lJ, 'z~o- !o'
I IH I I I I ' .:. j. I
[Hili
I I f.lll I r-
[1 I ~,c - -1 ~ I' - , I /
I~ I ~ ;V i
I~~~/i I,i,
~n.'.""""_''''la
:
'~ /) .~ ~I TS F E yl'Y OF ANOOVER"~,
~',' 2, - . I" ---(::;
, ---., ~
.I \ ,',.I'l,
f----;" ~~" , b" Al 11" I( , of '
~db"':T{m"cW ~~, ~.?T' -b,.G:...l' ,
-1i-T.4rE.<,~ '~' I
I ii" ~ I I "" I'~~ 7 .: .] I
...L / ~ . .
4 I 'I',.,.,
J I. . ',' III J'I' J
.. '. ~
l f---' . ~Aw.K~:
, ~ ' Rio(/i-~
I .,. . ,I -./,
i'::'- EAST'
~. ,~j~
, '~.. 'G,'
1'2 JL
I
I
'...11 IT I
f-~r/llll i ,
, " .
;~...' I,
mi'~ I ii,
III I .
"
~Iy
,
i
-
-
_,1.---
,
I
-:;::~\
~~
~~
.~t:"s.\~\
~'I'~ _:
4 \ J tJ" _' I
~-I 111
/', ,I I U
.......,... - ,+
~"- .,.-
Cr5' , ~. 'r--"-
. ,-----"JJ '-
~-Z..
~)) .
I
,
,
,
I i
-~
, r
-;
= MJGH'S.~:PARK
~ 'I ' !J!4!J;"I'j':':"';,
1
i ,il I
1illf11~
- ~ ~l~~~'-2-I~) 1+-- .-. ...1. ,~._i__
~~ADo.J~ I I
- vf\'\ '3)1 'I I
= r---'J::j
-
t------;- ,
,,' --- ~
'~f-
~ '----..-
"
-
F
. z' IV I I
,
I I I I
I ,Il I I
! I
I ;n I I
" " __000.10 I I
I , , , , ,-,--, r-. I I
...t>.
~'p'
.~
"
I I
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1992
~JM Receive Petition/92-19/
. Weybridge 3rd
BY: Todd J. Haas
4P
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Non-Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution waiving
public hearing and ordering improvement and directing preparation
of plans and specifications for the improvement of Project 92-19
for sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm sewer in the
following area of Weybridge 3rd Addition.
The feasibility report has already been approved by the City on
February 4, 1992 for Phase III. The estimate for Phase III is
$304,633.00 for 53 lots.
The escrow amount for the plans and specifications is $15,000.
'-
MOTION BY
F~ TO
',-
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
, -..
RES. NO.
u
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND
DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
OF PROJECT 92-19 FOR S.S., WM, ST, AND STORM SEWER
IN THE FOLLOWING AREA WEYBRIDGE 3RD ADDITION
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 7th day of January
19 92 , order the preparation of a feasibility study for the
improvements; and
WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by TKDA and
presented to the Council on the 4th day of February , 19~; and
WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a Public
Hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and
declares the improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of
$ 304,633.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the
Andover to hereby receive the feasibility
total cost of improvements of $ 304,633.00
Hearing and order improvements.
City Council of the City of
report with an estimated
, waive the Public
o
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the
firm of TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such
improvement proJect.
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby
require the developer to escrow the sum of $ 15,000.00 with such
payments to be made prior to commencement of work on the plans and
specifications.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
Meeting this 1st day of September
City Council at a
regular
19~, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
(j
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
. \
~J
~~
\"j
qz-/Oj
~gbforb
1llebdopment ~orporation, JJnc.
3640 - 152nd Lane N.W. . Andover, MN 55304 . 427-9217
August 21, 1992
James E. Schrantz
City Engineer
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, Mn 55304
RE: PROPOSED WEYBRIDGE, 3RD ADDITION SUBDIVISION
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
Ashford Development Corporation, Inc. does hereby petition for
improvements by the construction of water main, sanitary sewer,
storm sewer and streets with concrete curb and gutter with the
costs of the improvement to be assessed against the benefiting
property which is described as:
WEYBRIDGE, 3RD ADDITION
Said petition is unanimous and the public hearing may be waived.
The feasibility report for this addition has already been prepared,
as this was part of the overall Weybridge Feasibility Report.
Sincerely,
~tv~
Ashford Development Corporation, Inc.
Jerry Windschitl, President
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE September 1. 1992
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
/S
Approve Res/zoning of
S. Andover Site
BY:
Admin.
V. Volk ~.~.
Non-Discussion Items
Anoka Electric Cooperative has asked that the City Council adopt
the attached resolution confirming the following regarding the
South Andover Site:
1. The site is currently zoned Industrial.
2. The Comprehensive Plan classifies the site as
Industrial.
3. The City does not contemplate changing the zoning.
VV:Attch.
,
\
'-
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
-~
o
o
'J
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO. R
A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE
SOUTH ANDOVER SITE.
WHEREAS, the United States Environmental Protection Agency
has initiated proceedings that will result in the clean up of the
South Andover Salvage Yards ("the Site"), located on Bunker Lake
Boulevard in the City of Andover, and;
WHEREAS, the eventual use of the Site is an issue in the
proceedings, and;
WHEREAS, the current and potential use of the Site is
controlled by the City's land use ordinances and regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover that:
1. The Site is currently zoned for industrial use.
2. The City's Comprehensive Plan classifies the Site as
industrial.
3. The City does not contemplate changing the industrial
zoning or classification of the Site.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 1st
day of
September
, 19 92.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Attest:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victorla Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
o
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA DS.ECTION .
NO. lSCUSSlon
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
September 1~ 1992
Planning
~
ITEM
NO.
/,.
the Compo Plan
Ashford Develop.
David L. Carlberg
BY: Ci ty Planner
REQUEST
The City Council is requested by Jerry Windschitl (Ashford
Development Corporation) to direct Staff to prepare a Minor
Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to include 19+/- acres into
the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The area requested is
the Third Addition of the Weybridge Plat.
,r
A public hearing will not be required because the request is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan that has been submitted to
Metropolitan Council.
Staff has determined that this request could be submitted to Metro
Council in two weeks. This includes report preparation and
photocopying time by City Staff. TKDA will also be involved in
calculating sewer flow projections for the area requested.
The developer shall be responsible for paying all charges incurred
by the City during the minor amendment process. The cost is
estimated to be between $500 and $1,000.
\
'-
COUNCIL ACTION
"
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'--
~~
(J
, '\
'..~
~5bforb
tllebdopment qcorporation, Jfnc.
3640 - 152nd Lane N.W. . Andover, MN 55304 . 427-9217
August 21, 1992
Mr. James Schrantz
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd NW
Andover, Mn 55304
Dear Mr. Schrantz,
Ashford Development Corporation, Inc. respectively requests the
City of Andover to apply for a minor amendment to the Comprehensive
Develop~ent Plan for the land area detailed as Phase II:
(h'eybridge, 3rd Addition) in the TKD.l\ feasibility report for
Weybridge.
Included in this request are approximately 19+/- acres of bUlldable
land including :-oad right of way. The plat of Heybr:.dge has
received all of the outside perml~S needed and is not propcsieg to
fill, al~er, or cons~ruc~ in any wetland or protected waterway.
Also, the plat or weybridg,? 3rd Addi ~ion ccmnlles ",nth the
proposed storm wa~er ~un off rules (as ~le understand them) as it
has a settlement pond pr:or to the discharge of storm wa~er into
a public water way.
Given the degree of uncertainty over whee the Andover Ccnprehensive
Plan would be reviewed, the need of lots and the potential loss of
the 1992 construction season, we hope that our request would be
received favorably and that the City Council authorizes the City
staff and consultants to prepare the necessary documents for this
request.
The minor amendment process is authorized by the Metropolitan
Council and has been used successfully by other cities in similar
circumstances. He would reimburse the City for the expenses
related to the amendment.
Thank you for your consideration of this re~uest.
Slncerely,
N?<./-' ~.. e'U?
Ashford Development Corporation, Inc.
Jerry Windschitl, President
CITY OF ANDOVER
~ -j
'-,
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1992
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Non-Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
AP~~'{ED FOR
AGF~t)4
I,V( )
BY: I ~V
I
ITEM Adopt 1993 Proposed
NO.
7. Property Tax Levy
/ .
BY: Jim Schrantz
The City Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution
adopting the City of Andover's 1993 Proposed Property Tax Levy to
be certified to the County Auditor and establishing the budget
for the general fund.
/~
\.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
\._-'"
, ,
I
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO. R
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY OF ANDOVER 1993 PROPOSED PROEPRTY
TAX LEVY TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AND ESTABLISHING
THE BUDGET FOR THE GENERAL FUND.
WHEREAS, the preparation and adoption of operating budgets
is recognized as sound financial practice; and
WHEREAS, the City of Andover receives significant financial
support from its residents through the payment of property taxes;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Andover has the responsibility to
appropriately and efficiently manage the public's funds; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota State Law requires the city to certify to
, \ the County Auditor a proposed tax levy and budget prior to
,-) September 15th.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Andover hereby adoptes the proposed 1993 property tax
levy totaling $2,105,999.00, of which $1,600,322.00 is for
general purposes and is levied against all taxable property
within the City of Andover, $15,697.00 is levied against property
located within the Lower Rum River Watershed Taxing District for
the City of Andover's share of costs of this organization and
$489,980.00 is for the repayment of bonded indebtedness as
follows: $36,000.00 for the 1992 Certificates of Indebtedness,
$26,022.00 is for the 1989 Certificates of Indebtedness,
$25,677.00 is for the 1990 Certificates of Indebtedness and
$402,281.00 is for the 1991 Fire Station Bonds.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Andover hereby establishes the preliminary General Fund budget as
follows:
, \
',~
o
o
o
-- -.-_..~.,---_..,.......~,..-. .......,....>-''''._-,..,..~.. '.._--_. -
General Fund
Revenue:
Taxes
Licenses and Permits
Intergovernmental
Charges for Services
Fines and Forfeitures
Special Assessments
Miscellaneous
Transfers from Other Funds
$1,296,030
294,995
643,792
101,200
37,000
3,000
78,000
97,498
$2,551,515
Total Revenue
Expenditures:
General Government
Public Safety
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Recycling
Economic Development
Other financing uses
Contingency
Total Expenditures
$ 625,888
899,678
579,059
244,357
32,381
19,059
81,733
69,360
$2,551,515
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 1st
day of
September , 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Attest:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor'
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
@\.,
'i,
.,~
\'\
o~}
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1992
AGENDA ..5EC[IDN .
NO. ~ta t-, Commlttee,
Commission
ITEM
NO.
Authorize Signatures
Joint Coop. Agree.
ORIGINATJNG I;)EPARTMENT ~
Plannlng ~
David L. Carlberg
BY: Ci ty Planner
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to authorize the Mayor and
City Clerk to sign the amendment to the Joint Cooperation
Agreement. In order for the City to participate in the 1993-1995
Community Development Block Grant Program, the City must execute
three copies of the amendment and send a certified copy of the
resolution authorizing the signatures to Anoka County by September
29, 1992. Attached is a resolution for Council approval and a
copy of the amendment.
(-
'--
COUNCIL ACTION
/'
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
\.~
'\
'--./'
~-J
\
)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -92
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN ADDENDU~
NO. 2 TO THE JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT AS A PART OF THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM SUBGRANTEE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANDOVER AND ANOKA COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City has been requested to execute three (3)
copies of an amendment to the existing Joint Cooperation Agreement
between the City of Andover and Anoka County; and
WHEREAS, the City has been requested to submit a certified
copy of a resolution authorizing the signatures on said amendment;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby authorizes Kenneth D.
Orttel, Mayor and Victoria Volk, City Clerk to sign three copies
of an amendment to the existing Joint Cooperation Agreement
between the City of Andover and Anoka County; and
WHEREAS, the City understands it shall execute said
request in order to participate in the 1993-1995 Community
Development Block Grant Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby authorizes Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor and
Victoria Volk, City Clerk to sign three copies of an amendment to
the existing Joint Cooperation Agreement between the City of
Andover and Anoka County.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 1st day of
September, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
ATTEST
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
.~-
. "
o
ADDENDUM NO.2 TO
JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT
THIS ADDENDUM, made and entered into this day of ,
1992, (the date of the signatures of the parties notwithstanding) by and between Anoka County,
a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and the
City of Andover, Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "Municipality," said parties to this
Agreement, each being governmental units of the State of Minnesota, and is made pursuant to
Minn. Stat. 9 471.59.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the parties entered into an agreement under Title 1 of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, to provide for a program of community
development block grants; and
WHEREAS, the parties amended their agreement in 1989, to add Paragraph H., under
Section V, of Special Provisions; and
WHEREAS, the parties again wish to amend said Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and understandings
contained herein, the parties agree that said Agreement be and hereby is amended as follows:
CJ
The parties agree to add the following Paragraph I. to Section V., under Special
Provisions:
I. The parties mutually agree to take all required actions within their jurisdictions to
adopt and enforce policies prohibiting the use of excessive force by their law enforcement
agencies against individuals engaged in non,violent civil rights demonstrations and against
physically barring entrance to, or exit from, facilities subject to non,violent civil rights
demonstrations.
The parties further agree to amend Paragraph F, under Special Provisions to read as
follows:
F. The parties mutually agree to take all actions necessary to assure compliance with
the County's certification required by Section 104(b) of Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, as amended, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fair
Housing Act, Section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, The
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and other applicable laws. Furthermore, the parties agree
that the County shall not provide funding for any activities in or in support of any Municipality that
does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or that impedes the County's
actions to comply with its fair housing certification.
" '".
'-~/
- 1 -
'--./
/ "
"---)
\
)
. .
1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by its
duly authorized officers and delivered on its behalf this day of
COUNTY OF ANOKA
By:
Dan Erhart, Chairman, Anoka
County Board of Commissioners
Date:
ATTEST:
By:
John "Jay" Mclinden
County Administrator
Date:
Upon proper execution this agreement
will be legally valid and binding.
Assistant Anoka County Attorney
Date:
APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION:
Assistant Anoka County Attorney
Dated:
cdbg\contract\jt ,coop. ad2
CITY OF ANDOVER
By:
Title: Mavor
Date:
By:
Title: ClerkfTreasurer
Date:
COMMUNITY MUST CHECK ONE:
The Community is organized pursuant to:
Plan A
Plan B
Chartered
- 2 -
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 1, 1992
AGEttA.\dUWJ1'Yh Items
NO.
ORIGINATING OEPARTMENT ~
P annlng ~
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
ITEM.---- ..~v..
NO "'LOt Issue
. South Coon Creek Dr.
BY:
APPR, ~~rrR
AGEj~
~
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to discuss and resolve the issue of
whether Don Emmerich should receive a building permit for a lot
with 172 feet of frontage on South Coon Creek Drive. The property
is zoned R-4, but is not located in the MUSA (Metropolitan Urban
Service Area).
BACKGROUND AND HISTORY
On July 7, 1987, Tony Emmerich requested direction from Council on
how to proceed with splitting a lot jointly owned by him and his
brother Don. Don Emmerich did not want to attach his half of the
lot to a parcel he owned to the east therefore creating three lots
(in addition to Don Emmerich's eastern most lot) which goes beyond
the provisions of the Lot Split Ordinance, No. 40.
Council directed Mr. Emmerich to split the parcel jointly owned
between him and his brother. He then could make application to
rearrange the lot lines (movement of inter~or lot lines) and form
two buildable lots. Don Emmerich's eastern parcel created by the
split was deemed a buildable lot because it met the requirements
of an R-4 district. Please consult the attached July 7, 1987 City
Council meeting minutes.
On July 28, 1987, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the
lot split request of Tony Emmerich to split a lot jointly owned by
Tony and his brother Don. Tony Emmerich had requested the split
so he could combine the parcel or portion he owned to a parcel to
the west and then move the interior lot line to create a buildable
parcel meeting the City's requirements for an R-1, Single Family
Rural district. Don Emmerich had no interest in combining his
portion of the property from the split to his parcel to the east.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
Page Two
Emmerich Lot Issue
city Council Meeting
September 1, 1992
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council
that the lot split requested by Tony Emmerich be approved with the
condition that the 150 foot westerly portion of the lot be
combined or attached to a 200 foot parcel adjacent to the west.
The resulting parcel would then be 350' wide. This combination
was to be filed with Anoka County at the same time as the lot
split. Park dedication fees were also to be paid by the
applicant. Please consult the attached minutes from the July 28,
1987, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.
It should be noted that the 172 foot lot created by the split and
owned by Don Emmerich was considered a buildable lot because it
met the requirements of the R-4 zoning district.
On August 4, 1987, the City Council approved the lot split as
requested by Tony Emmerich. However, the resolution approved by
the City Council did not accurately reflect the recommendation of
the Planning and Zoning Commission. Under the first condition of
the resolution, reference is made to the combination of a 150 foot
lot and a 172 foot lot. Staff believes that reference should have
been made to the 200 foot lot and not the 172 foot lot as was
recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Therefore the
resolution should be rescinded and a new resolution adopted
rescinding the resolution currently on record. Staff has prepared
a new resolution attached for Council approval.
COUNCIL DECISIONS
Using the information stated above in this report and the attached
minutes the Council should decide:
1. Whether Mr. Don Emmerich should be granted a building permit
on the 172 foot lot. Please note that the property was never
included in the MUSA (approved by Metropolitan Council). However
every indication from the meeting minutes indicated the City
deemed the lot buildable for an R-4 zoned parcel. Staff has
included the 172 foot parcel in the proposed MUSA expansion for
the years 2000-2005.
2. Should Council rescind the current resolution (143-87) and
adopt the new resolution attached.
3. Council should direct Staff to begin the process of rezoning
the eastern 150 feet of Tony Emmerich's parcel from R-4, Single
Family Urban to R-1, Single Family Rural. When the split
occurred, the parcel to be split was zoned R-4. The 150 foot
parcel was combined to a parcel to the west which is zoned R-1.
Therefore, the existing 350' parcel has two zoning classifications
and needs to be corrected.
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -92
A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. R143-87 WHICH GRANTED
A LOT SPLIT TO TONY EMMERICH TO SPLIT A 322.84 FOOT PARCEL ON
SOUTH COON CREEK DRIVE INTO TWO PARCELS, A 150 FOOT AND A 172.84
FOOT PARCEL.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Andover approved
a lot split to Tony Emmerich on August 4, 1987 on property located
on South Coon Creek Drive; and
WHEREAS, the City of Andover Resolution was found to be
in error and conflicts with the motion made at the July 28, 1987
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby rescinds Resolution No. R143-92.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 1st day
of September, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
ATTEST
Victoria volk, City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -92
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT SPLIT AS REQUESTED BY ANTHONY
EMMERICH FOR PROPERTY IN SECTION 28-32-24.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed
the lot split request of Anthony Emmerich for property
described as "That part of the SE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 28,
Township 32, Range 24, in Anoka County, Minnesota lying south of
the centerline of County Ditch No. 57, also known as Coon Creek.
Subject to the right of way of an existing Town Road known as
South Coon Creek Drive as now laid out and travelled along the
south line of said SE1/4 of the NE1/4; and
WHEREAS, as a result of such review the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval of the lot split noting
the following: 1) the center parcel which currently exists is to
be split in half with 150 feet of frontage on the west and 172
feet on the east; 2) the lot split will not be detrimental to
surrounding property values; 3) it will result in lots meeting all
minimums of the zoning districts; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is in agreement with the reasons
set forth by the Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council to
hereby approve the lot split requested by Anthony Emmerich
contingent upon the following:
1. The 150 foot lot and the 200 foot lot shall be combined at the
same time as the deed is filed with Anoka County;
2. Park dedication fees.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 1st day
of September, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
ATTEST
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
/
Regula. City Council Meeting
July 7, 1987 - MInutes
Page 5
COMMERCIAL LOT SPLIT ORDINANCE/NO. 40
.'
Council dIscussed the peoposed amendment to the Lot Split oedinance to
al low lot splIts on commercIal p.operty wIth Chai.man Apel and Ms.
Bosel I. Attocney Hawkins thought the State Statute only allows the
paek dedication fees to be calculated on the value of the unimp.oved
p.opeety, not the value of the newly c.eated pa.cel.
"
Ms. Bosel I p.ovided a copy of the eXistIng Oedinance 40 wIth
compaeisons of the Changes PCoposed in the amendment befoce the
Council. Mayo. WIndschItl was concerned that the plattIng ordinance
and this one have the same wordIng regaeding pack fees.
Councilman Oettel aegued that by al lowing lot splits In the Commeecial
aeeas, the City is givIng up its contcol. Discussion was on the
disadvantages of allowIng lot splIts in commeccIal aeeas and on the
Ceasons it is being considered. It was then agreed a comp.omise would
be to al low the development of small commeccial aeeas under the
simplified platting peocess now being consideeed by the P & Z.
MOTION by Oettel, Seconded by Elling, that we table the amendment to
the Lot Split Oedinance and .efe. it back to the Planning Commission
foe fu.thee eevIew In conjunction with the sImplIfIed plattIng p.ocess
that they ace consideelng. Motion careied on a 3-Yes vote.
@
T. EMMERICH LOT SPLIT
Tonv Emmerich. South Coon Creek Drive - stated he eeceived approval
f.om the Council to eeaceange lot lines by SPlIttIng a lot owned
jointly with Don Emmeeich. Now Don Emmerich does not want to attach
his half of that lot to his Lot 4 paccel. Mr. Emmerich stated what he
'would lIke to do Is attachrhe weste.n half of that joIntly owned lot
to his lot and then split that newly cceated paecel In half and
consteuct a house to the east of hIs own house. Because Don EmmerIch
is not wantIng to attach the eastecn poet Ion of Lot 2 to hIs Lot 4, an
addItIonal lot would be ceeated, which Is not allowed under the Lot
Split O.dinance.
Ms. Bosel I sketched what was orIgInally eequested and Me. Emmerich's
neweequest. Aftee some discussIon, CouncIl ageeed to the fol lowIng:
The Emmeelch's should apply fo. a lot split of theic jOintly owned
paecel. The easteen poetion to be owned by Don Emmerich would meet
the R-4 zoning eequieements and the.efore would be a buildable paecel.
Tony Emmeeich could then make applIcation to eeac.ange the lot lInes
for the weste.n portion of the lot and the lot wIth hIs home to fo.m
two buildable R-l lots. The end .esult would be foue pa.cels.
Ms. Bosel I asked If Mr. Emmerich would have to pay the fee agaIn to
eequest a lot spilt. CouncIl stated the actual costs Incueeed wIth
the fiest eequest can be calculated. Me. EmmerIch stated he would pay
the fee.
Regular Planning Commission Meeting
Juljc~;28, 1987 - Minutes
Page 4
(Creekside Estates, Cont.)
MOTION by Jacobson, seconded by Jovanovich to close the public hearing. Motion carrie
"
MOTION by Perry, seconded by Jovanovich that the Andover Planning and Zoning Cvmmissio
recommend . " approval of the preli,minary plat of Creekside Estates
being developed by Paul Gengler and Richard Erickson in ~ection.27~32~24 contingent
upon the return of the developers wit~ a revised drawi~gVnoting the easements,
sUbmitting a completed soils report,~grading plan andvelevations with the understading
that if the items that have been suggested are not met, this item would not go to
the City Council on the 18th of August. The cul-de-sac shoula be shown as 60 feet.
Motion carried unanimously. This will be on the Planning Commission agenda on August
11 and the City council agenda on August 18.
.
Karin" Trost Variance
, Karin Trost, 13842 Northwood Drive - stated that she is requesting a variance so that
she can keep inventory for her business in the garage. The items to be stored are
tool box kits that go to school districts throughout the United states.
Commissioner Vistad felt that if a minor repair business is an allowed use, there
should be no problem with this.
John Trost - stated that they are the middlemen between the school districts and
Suppliers. He showed samples of the products that they would be storing. He also
noted that their neighbors to the north and south of them have been very helpful
and cooperative.
Acting Chairman Bosell asked how much of the garage space they would be using. Mr.
Trost noted that the south wall will be for storage and across the front will be
a parts bin. The office for the business will be in the downstairs of their home.
MOTION by Jovanovich, seconded by Jacobson that the Andover Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend to the City Council approval of a variance requested by Karin
Trost, BBI Company, to vary from Ordinance 8 to allow for inventory to be kept in
an attached garage at 13842 Northwood Drive for the following reasons: 1) It will
not adversely affect the existing or potential use of adjacent properties; 2) it
is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Commission finds that under Ordinance 8, Section 4.3, this use is of a similar
nature to a minor repair service which is an approved home occupation in this district
and the business be lim~ted to those parameters outlined in the letter from Mrs.
Trost dated July 7, 1987 using the attached drawing.
Motion carried unanimously. This will go to the City Council on August 18, 1987.
Mrs. Trost asked if this could go to the Council earlier and she was instructed to
call the Mayor.
@
Tony ~mmerich Lot Split _ ",",S, c!37--7
Tony Emmerich stated that he owns a parcel of land that is 500 feet wide, he and his
brother own the next parcel to the west and his brother Don owns the next parcel on
South Coon Creek Drive. The parcel that is jointly is the one they wish to split.
Tony will end up with 2.3 acres and 5.2 acres and his brother will have one parcel
that is 173 feet and one that is 496 feet.
Regular Planning Cammissian Meeting
JulYJ'28, 1987 - Minutes
Page 5
(Emmerich Lat Split, Cant.)
Acting Chairman Basell e~plained that abaut a year ago. this came befare the city
and. the decisian was that anly interiar lat lines needed to. be maved; hawever,
Dan Emmerich daes nat chaase to. add his 172.84 faat parcel to. his praperty. The
praperty is zaned R-4; it meets the requirements.
"
~Dan.Emmerich; 2439 Sauth Caan Creek Drive -_state~,that he has no. intentian'af cambin-
ing the 172.84 faat wide parcel to. his ather 'parcel; The parcel that his hame is
an shauld nat even enter into. this discussian;
MOTION by Jacabsan, secanded by perry that the Andaver Planning and Zaning Cammissian
recammend to. the City Cauncil appraval af a lat split requested by Anthany Emmerich
an the parcel af land described as 'That part af the SE~ af the NE~ af Sectian 28,
Tawnship 32, Range 24 in Anaka Caunty, Minnesata lying sauth af the centerline af
Caunty Ditch No.. 57, also. knawn as Caan Creek. Subject to. the right af way af an
existing Tawn Raad knawn as Sauth Caan Creek Drive as naw laid aut and travelled
alang the sauth line af said SE~ af the NE~'.
The Cammissian understands that the center parcel (02) which currently exists is to.
be split with 150' af frantage an the west and 172 feet an the east.
The Cammissian recammends appraval af this with the canditian that the 150 faat
westerly partian af the lat be attached to. the westerly parcel which is 200 feet in
width and will result in a 350 faat wide parcel. This is to. be filed with Anaka
Caunty at the same time as the lat split.
The lot split appraval is cantingent upan payment af the apprapriate park dedicatian
fees.
The Commissian finds that the lat split will nat be detrimental to. surraunding
praperties and will result in lats meeting all minimums af the zaning districts.
Matian carried unanimausly.
Discussian: Ms. Basell suggested recammending.ta_the_Cquncil...thatthey,,"amE!!ld ar
adjust" the zaning district line as part af Tany Emmerich's lat will be R-l and part
will be"R-4:'
Ran Smith Lat Split, Cant.
MOTION by Jacabsan, secanded by Vis tad to. cantinue this to. the next meeting. Motian
carried.
Goad Value hames Rezaning, Cant.
MOTION by Jacabsan, secanded by Vis tad to. cantinue this to. the next meeting. Matian
carried.
Amend Flaadway Map Baundaries
Dave Spaulding, Waadland Develapment - stated that they have applied far a Special
Use Permit far Calanial Creek which was appraved. A requirement in the plat is that
they fill three areas. In arder to. do. this, the City needs to. amend the flaadway
map. They have been to. the Caan Creek Watershed Baard and they appraved the plat with
the understanding that there wauld be same changes to. the flaadway map.
Cammissianer Perry asked if this was nat knawn at the time the plat was dealt with.
~
Regulae City Council Meeting
August 4, 1987 - Minutes
Page 4
"
TONY EMMERICH LOT SPLIT _ A..S'. 87-7
@
MOTION by EllIng, Seconded by KnIght, a Resolution app~ovlng a lot
split as eequested by Anthony Emme~ich fOL peopeety In Section 28 32
24 as peesented. (See Resolution R143-87) Motion caeLied unanImously.
159TH AVENUE PROBLEM
CouncIl noted the swIng and the platfoLm a~e no longee up along the
Rum Rlvee and the pa~klng has been extended. It was also undeestood
the'Anoka County MedIatIon Seevlce has scheduled a meeting with the
nelghboes about this Issue.
Janet Conwav - stated It hasn't stopped the paetles. She also stated
no meeting was held and not eveeyone has been contacted.
John Lynch. 159th - stated the pe~son In chaege of the MedIatIon
Seevice is on vacatIon this week but she has contacted the people.
Me. Scheantz stated he talked wIth Me. Buba, who IndIcated he met wIth
some of the neighboes and has ageeed to put up some posts. He wanted
to know wheee to put the posts. Me. Sch~antz told him the City would
woek with him and also help with No Teespasslng signs.
M~. Lynch - stated he talked wIth ML. Buba last Sunday evening out
in the steeet with theee deputIes, who weee theee because of an
Incident theee. Attoeney HawkIns stated If Me. Buba does not want the
people on that peopeety, the pollee can be gIven peemisslon to aeeest
them.
M~. G~ad - stated the peoblem Is Me. Buba has a 16-yeae-old son who
also uses the peopeety with felends. So when theee ace 50 people
theLe feom all ovee the citIes and the deputies ace called, eve~yone
sImply says they have pe~mlssion to be the~e feom the son. Attoeney
HawkIns stated unless Me. Buba has taken some afflemative steps to get
his son and feiends out of theLe, the CIty can peosecute him foe
maintaining a public nuisance.
Ms. Conway - stated Me Buba was Invited to a meetIng last nIght, but
could not attend, stating he would be at tonIght's CouncIl meetIng.
But he Is not he~e.
Ron Hudak. 159th Avenue - stated the meetIng that took place last
Sunday was because of a police call. The only attempt M~. Buba evee
made was a eesult of this meetIng when two poles weLe put up. But
that was the only effoet made sInce this has been going on last
sp~ing.
Ms. Conway - explaIned a POLtion of
Johnson, who lIves In FloLlda, pact
Me. SmIth. She thought M~. Johnson
foe something to be done If he weLe
the a~ea Is
Is owned by
may be open
contacted.
owned by Chuck
Me. Buba, and paLt by
to gIvIng peLmisslon
She asked If the
i.
'/h'
{'P"
"~'
.,- .;/
-~.~.~:..;....t-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE August 4. 1987
OR
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning & Zoning
ITEM Tony Emmerich Lot Split
NO.
~.
BY:
Vicki Volk
MOTION by Jacobson, seconded by Perry that the Andover Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of a lot
split requested by Anthony Emmerich on the parcel of land described
as 'That part of the SE~ of the NE~ of Section 28, Township 32,
Range 24, in Anoka county, Minnesota lying south of the centerline
of County Ditch No. 5Z, also known as Coon Creek. Subject to the
right of way of an existing Town Road known as South Coon Creek Drive
as now laid out and travelled along the south line of said SE~ of the
NEt. '
The Commission understands that the center parcel (02) ~lhich currently
exists is to be split in half with 150' of frontage on the west and
172 feet on the east.
The Cnmmission recommends approval of this with the condition that the
150 foot westerly portion of the lot be attached to the westerly parcel
which is 200 feet in width and will result in a 350 foot wide parcel.
This is to be filed with Anoka County at the same time as the lot split.
The lot split approval is contingent upon payment of the appropriate
park dedication fees.
The Commission finds that the lot split will not be detrimental to surround-
ing properties and will result in lots meeting all minimums of the zoning
districts.
Motion carried unanimously.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
----
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO. Rl43-87
"
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT SPLIT AS REQUESTED BY ANTHONY
EMMERICH FOR PROPERTY IN SECTION 28-32-24.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed
the lot split request of Anthony Emmerich for property described
as 'That part of the SE~ of the NE~ of Section 28, Township 32,
Range 24, in Anoka County, Minnesota lying south of the center-
line of County Ditch No. 57, also known as Coon Creek. Subject
to the right of way of an existing Town Road known as South
Coon Creek Drive as now laid out and travelled along the south
. line of said SE~ of the NE~ '; and
WHEREAS, as a result of such review the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval of the lot split noting the follow-
ing 1) the center parcel which currently exists is to be split in
half with l50 feet of frontage on the west and l72 feet on the
east; 2) the lot split will not be detrimental to surrounding
property values; 3) it will result in lots meeting all minimums
of the zoning districts; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is in agreement with the reasons
set forth by the Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby
approve a lot split requested by Anthony Emmerich contingent upon
the following:
1. The l50 foot lot and the l72 foot lot shall be combined
at the same time as the deed is filed with Anoka County;
2. Park dedication fees.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 4th
day of
August
, 1987.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
~ t.l/'~ ~~V
Je y ndschitl - Mayor
k&
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
Lf~'~, r
:'" . - ~
--
-- -
," ,; -cu~ ::::;:~Q;:ATION . iRVINE, '::'l:F.:RNI.4
or I
':;~:';::J=~ BY NUMBE':; ':J75i4.rl
"
"""
,~
"
-,~
~~'~
~ ~
': -~ .1
J
C
t
~
:r
~
h.
If)
;.
'.
~
~
~
1. ~~
I ~ ,~
<.~ -
f\
---..
~
-----
~
"i
~.
,
~
"':
, ,
"
,
-..., ~
::.::::- ~''''
....... '1\':-
,'~ :.,~
~
,
[i
1:) ~
-\J
--"",t7/~.f'"",
"
~
'-
~
..
J'~
~ ~
\~ \JJ
~
~
1~ ~ ~
, <..:.
! ~ ~
: .... tJ)
: !()
I
.. I
",il
,~
~~
".
"
~ :
!'i
~-~
4-'
'J::I
~
+-
<):l
J
~
~
...
B
':
j
v
...
o
o
t1)
::
;%
I..
"
,
,
"
II:
.+
~
;ttf
ffi
-I;
. :
':'1"11
. ,
", ~
I,
.- ~
;,
"
..iJ_-.t'! -':':": ':'~~P,JRAT!tJ;\J .
:-:'-=-;:;_'=~ :3"- :\.j~\:.)t:;~
\:" "'-
f~ ,", ~~~; "::,~"'t
.;: ~~ ~ -;''-'~ Ic\~.~ ~
~ ' .....s..;. ~" .).
, "''\
'')..;-- ~\; :..., ~
""': '-<~~d ~-.~-. ~
... \~\1
'~
~I
l<
..
~
"
@-
'--
...,.. ~,. I
._:'4 -aLD C::;::=O;ATJON . iRVINE. ::::'L:F'::RNI~
=:E:'~J:;; 3V NUM2E=i 075.1;::;
.'
.'
,)
to... i
If) ~
'.
'.
~
j ~~
~ .~
"-
r
--... \l\
~
): f'
,~
,;;
--:-..";;,~
~:"i~
~ ~
\:, '"'
...
\\\
~ \:
."-.:.
..;
~
t
i.
III
~ -So
'-.:.
t;:
~
l
'-i
::0.
~
"':
, ,
"
,
-....~
~ ~''''
....... ~:-
,'~ ':..\..
.,..,p....J".....
~:_J.:--, ,::':..:J ,::Ct=lP,]RATIOi\l
~
1~ ~ ~
. ~
1 ~ ~
: "<r)
i ~
I
..'
,-
ii
.J
, .
-l-
~ :
~ :
.. ,
,>
feE
j!
~ I
I
':
..
;~
!~
.'
,
"
II:
.+
~
:ttf
ffi
~I
, I
,;11
'.
;.
,\R t.......
';!~' .....,~'l!1l\ ......~~
',: '"\ ~ :,.,~ ~;.... \6
:..~ . ':""';" ~,;. . ~
. ~ .. '0;\'; ~ _..'....'-)
~ '..;~~P ~.~~ ~
'<:1
@-
:E'J;::;:'::i=i 3Y Nl.J:-"lciE;:;
~
..
~
">
ANDOVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
MINUTES OF THE BUSINESS MEETING
July 22, 1992
~
~
~
\~
The meeting was called to order at 7:10 P.M. by Chief Dale Mashuga.
The pledge of allegiance was said and roll call taken. The minutes of the
June 17, 1992 Business Meeting were not available for approval.
GRIEVANCE
Tom Miller presented a proposed agenda for handling the discussion anc
resolution of the grievance with Steve Brown. The agenda was discussed, a
motion to approve it as proposed was made by Paul Gengler, seconded by
Kevin Starr, and the motion was approved unanimously by the membership.
Letters regarding the grievance from Chief Mashuga and Firefighter
Steve Brown were read as well as the Finding of Facts from the Grievance
Committee.
Comments from Chief Mashuga: He had several discussions with the Cit>
Attorney and the City Administrator. There are conflicts between Fire
Department policies and City policies that need to be worked out. Dale
stated that he had changed his mind and was not going to attempt to
terminate Firefighter Brown. Instead, he was asking the membership to
approve a ninety (90) day suspension based on the three (3) violations of
Department policies found by the Grievance Committee in their Finding of
Facts. Dale stated that Firefighter Brown had been "talked to" at least
three (3) times prior and he feels that there is a need to stop the
conflict and arguments and to require the use of the Chain of Command.
Dale stated that he regretted having to propose the suspension and would
accept the decisign of the membership as a "final say".
Comments from firefighter Brown: Lieutenant Dave Reitan read aloud a
written response from Steve. In the ietter Steve asked for a clarificatio~
of the length of suspension and would accept said suspension if that is
what the membership decided on. He stated that he accepts the findings of
the Grievance Committee but does not agree with those findings.
Following a ten (10) minute break to allow the membership to examine
all written material and sign up to address the membership if they L~ished,
the following members spoke:
Dave Reitan - Stated that Steve is very good on fire and EMS scenes
but needs to control his temper.
Tim Howe - Read a letter from Steve to the membership and made several
other comments in support of Steve.
Bob Peach - Discussed his concern about the process. Pointed out that
persons shouid be innocent until proven guilty. Does not
feel that we are following our own procedures (i.e.
verbal warning, written warning, suspension, and then
termination)
Randy Vierkant - Steve had asked for a Leave of Absence. Didn't get
it due to the need for a vote by the Personnel Committee.
Points were taken away while was supposed to be on a LOA.
Need one set of rules.
There foilowed a discussion regarding the length of suspenSlon,
A vote of the membership was taken in this matter. Results: 24-yes 4-no
4-abstained (Randy Vierkant and 3 others).
ANDOVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
MINUTES OF THE BUSINESS MEETING
July 22, 1992
OTHER BUSINESS
Discussed the upcoming County Hazardous Materials collection and mannlng
the escape house at the County Fair.
Dale further discussed the Chain of Command. Trying to make it work.
Members need to take things to their officers. Tim Howe stated that the
City Administrator "has a problem with our Chain of Command". Dale statec
that the City does not have to approve.
Training Committee needs all certificates and records of hours of internal
and external training.
People are still needed for upcoming Dome games.
Dave Reitan wants to get out of doing special purchases. Tom Johnson and
Ken Anderson volunteered to take over.
Dale and the membership thanked the Open House Committee for a job weil
done.
Discussed Engine 1 soon to be 3. Due back around Labor Day.
Dale named Tom Miller to Chair the Staff Resource Committee.
,
The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 P.M.
Respectfully Submitted,
/~~ 4d-7
Larry Capeling
Acting Secretary
)>'1",
~~ - '"
:;Kl~
,~I '!.'.
.llt"i "
'~k;:,
','I'.:.: C..;::
ill"~
,~,.
'. l..
~ri'
i!'"''
'-W''''''
~ \.
:i~...."
:1"1
h-
\"-';"
'" \..
~4~~
~
:...-:.
:II
1"1';
I'.;.,;,
. I..
1k.
I, I..
,
1~~:.
~.
I.
l~~
1~:
'j.l. \ "
tR. ".
\;;1
'I>'::'
II
"
'~.
P
I Po'
! I.
,I'
i;.r
;'1-
t.
l~r
'i&'."
\, t
j~..,
! ~
.l.~'
~n
l~'
'H"
. .
I ~J;:
;J.
j~
j..~...:1.;:
~ ':':( .
i 1
'f
!~.
Ji' , ,
F
1\ 1
:~~,
:h '. t' ,
1ftf-"~""'~"""P"*"""......,.,......"~_._",,,_.__,,,,,,,,,, ..... fI_.
. "'1;11 jl.. '~I""'I"'."'t."_"_'''.'''''''"""",,,.,, "'I_~
....,:.I.. _~:::~:~;-:,::;,.r7 -~:~lf~~~\i~~!:'.j:<.~ ;'('-. ~ .~,,': ~,:!:p..'
I'
'-..
Q
OUtU,
~~
"0,.0
, /\...,,:):--~ C-rt.-li't..'t
t'
~
~ .
,
~"
r
,.
r-:
I
r.
r
f - / ,D- I l( . V c... C. !A. +- " 0 ~
S'.--./7.- p~~ ~
_J1.,~:~~::S::D oS .'
. I
3:r./~ /lfJ...c........... ~-- ..,;...........~ ~
...''-~..~~ ~o-C ~
J, . .'... "~ ~ -[-
__i..,:,.,~;; ~ 1~t-6t~~
... ,---,,--J.:N~..~,~trY\ ~ S~'--'-
;{- i -,f :..... j' .... 't)""A~ F Pc
. I CI, ..~:,::"~l--""^"'f~---~cr-----'- ~
~'~',-;~~~~:: ~
.__. JY~ ~~ ~ /\...~_/L.,_..~~_
,.. ~ ~-r'-.' '~J ~.-n--'----:t--<-~
v () . l...- jI ~ .
o -..J..l ,,_.W.~ ------,c:' /\...<_~ ~
. n .n: _ ,u,~~.........", ~_A>~...::r-- &i ~.J__
.... ..~, ~ ~-..t>c: ) A-;) ~1-<-I' ""our.: /
. ,n; _ s.d' "-"11 ~ -f.r' ~ .) 1 () '3 I V f ~
"" _ ^ J , . d.. 1_ -1' ,"" ~ 'j lAu J '
. ..,.,...........-<-y? ~....... iT" \.-/ L-~~I vc_'-<:./__::", ,'14~<1.<.
.. vo.-U -tv LA- ~ c~.
G.eA- (7"7'2J.~ ~ ~ ~'U-<-~~.
W~~ ~~ V>-r?/V]--t.~ ~),,--i
I
I
I
I
\
!.
~.
~
g- :;LO
W <rVk O'V'- ~-t~~~
. r
T~A~~ ~~FfR..
7 ~.J-o H ~ .s~ oJ..r~ p.....--..y'\/l<-......y'-
~ ~ ~ 5 ~ (J~'--~---
__ ..h.'__tJ.~ ~ ~ /1.-'-<--- ~_.'--.....
.__,~ ~ '~I~__ ~-C.~_
... ,w~. o-v--- ----v:....~ ~
~~~
v.J .~, b. ~ /\...J.-<_. ~
.~;{- 5Sl:L /((2-- ~
..~~ S~ ~
. .c.o,.;.....f ~
.'
,....0'\'
_ ...___...."-,<'11 ='"""''''.", ."., '
''$
'141,.'"
.0
,0
;~
''18
'3
"9
~
.. ~--,---, --'-'.-.~---"'--" "..-...
oo~
*~
00,.0
'f'
.. _.,.__ __g:-:__?:L:'_'_~_.s~ ~
~ ~ 4____.-...--'
...._1 -"-----..---.'. - ,___,.0... .--,~.--,. -6"'-''-'~'"'-''
i '. __:~_~.nO""'1 CA>-v-- ~
,-;)
''1)
"0
,'@
'1)
''$
''$
,,.
''0
."
."
.~
.",
'...,
,'\)
'"l
."
.'\)
.~
,(0)
_ ,.__,__ _..._,.__,.t.J.~Uv->..- ~~
----,.._--_.;.:...~-~~ ~,
__,____ _, _...~.c_.~~-~~
.__ _____,__~:....~-'~~-~ c.c-vv--f 0-)
1. '- . . .
n ..,_,_,______,_".~~T'-:c:!~~-rl-~-j;:-r- J 3'15'9 ~~..........
.____ ..._ .-__.._:~.D,.:.W~k,,~m:;~~
_,,_":''':_:c~_W~'1J-~ -~
..._..___..;.:z.~'-:..;t<, -=1-~, ~ ~
_ \. ., _" _ . _ .,. _ .jl~ /l'-Y^' -:-v""'. ;!i-~ A '.:1' G-ci1...
..J ._."._,_ ___..___~- ..t.'::j.,~~-c..J ~.v-~
I .
_I ,.."" ___...._~._, y-z--. ~ C/?-,A_,
- ' . j
.1 .._.,-....,'~ D~ ~-~
I ~., ~ c.~1.--
I u______~.-..--p . ~ I
I
i--" --.---- ~ ~ ......... c..Y
I .. __ _,_.: .,_1p.,t~ }O,. ~~ ~"d- ~- ~'-'- c""--
.. ..-...,,~~ 0-(. /'Y\L~(p'-J-rc'-' "{;-"\"'~' '1
. _, ~____.__~,. tt.-~~ _ ,.. 13 3" ~
____ _,." __. _.. .__..,tJ._~ '<ro0..._1 P <.0 """ ~
.,.,....,'~~~ 0~
,
I
--I
I
..~
';~
,~
,..~
.,~3
~':~
,"r~
...4
.~4
..;.-~
I
. .1.,
- i
,
I
I
,...~
(~
. "-I
.,.,.
~O;~
-':i
~:l'
1t!11:
l!\~
!:."
,.
~. "
~I ;,
.','
1;
f;.
(.. .
,
~:
~~
;r:
I;;
~~
r(.
!~
i~
~,:' .
r
:t1
r~
~,
~~< .
Si
~,
f~f. .
~: :
~;,-.
;;:. .
r
~
~.
;"
"
~" .
F~
I
~'
If:'
r
i'
1'1
I
I:
[1
I..
I ., --,....-----,..,.'. - ....----- -------
"" 'i t' I I"
~"f
~:I;- Ji1~1 ,'"\"~;;j.mnll'l!IPAIiIU _'UliI._____..."..._.....__..''''.....''''''''''.'''.......-...-,..r... '"...._".,...."."'''~..."'".,,'"' ' "
'~~1I"~,,.,~,. . ""'IlI","IIII.___twJ.lll..~"""-.""'~-~""""'.""'=:="""'~"~-'~:=::-:' "'C": :"."
::, (. ~"d'. ,',O.~: ~ ~~i;i l~~;i~~"t~ ;jtl i~Hlt i~ ~;.t~; ~~t i~:t f! a~~.i ~~, FE ~: A ,:t.i h: ~~ .
Office of 1/1 /tJz/
ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
KENNETH G. WILKINSON - SHERIFF
Courthouse - 325 East Main Street - Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612-421-4760
R ~u~ ~I'l~ ED
crry OF AluJuyJj;J{
....nnu.Y CDIn'RAC'!' PBOIJIJC'!'Iv.l REPORT
MONTH:
Jl1ly
, 1992
.-
CITY OF ANDOVER
This report reflects the productivity of the Andover contract cars,
3l25, 3135, 3145 and 3l55. It does not include activity by
Sheriff's Department cars wi thin the City during non-contract
hours, nor, activity by other Sheriff's Department cars within the
city during contract hours.
69 Radio 'Calls 640
2 Complaints 463
1 Medicals l6
0 P.I. Accidents 1
23 P.O. Accidents 13
2 Domestics 20
0 House Checks 55
60 Business Checks 293
62
74
11,887
Arrests: Traffic
OWl
Arrests: Felony
G.M.
Misdemeanor
Arrests: Warrant
Papers Served:
Warnings:
Aids: Public
other Agencies
TOTAL MILES PATROLlED:
CAPTAIN LEN CHRIST
ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
PATROL DIVISION
-6-
Affirmative Action I Eaual Occortunitv Emclover
DATE: September 1, 1992
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
city Council Budget Minutes - August 11, 1992
Regular City Council Minutes - August 18, 1992
Letter from Pat Schwappach, Anoka cty. Historical Society-8/18/92
Letter from John Davidson, TKDA - August 24, 1992
Coon Creek Watershed Information
Fire Department Information
Schedule of Bills
Authorize Signatures Joint Coop. Agree.
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEX!
AGENDA.
THANK YOU.
REGULAR ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL MEETING - AUGUST 18. 1992
TABLE OF CONTENTS
AGENDA APPROVAL . .
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
REVISED FEASIBILITY STUDY/wATT'S GARDEN ACRES
Resolution R144-92 eeceivin9 amendments
1
1
PUBLIC HEARING/IP92-18/JAY STREET . . . . . .
Resolution R145-92 oedeeing the impeovement
1
2
5
SPECIAL USE PERMIT/REAL ESTATE SIGNS/MEADOWS OF ROUND LAKE
Resolution R146-92 appeoving peemit ....... . . . .
5
SPECIAL USE PERMIT/AREA IDENTIFICATION SIGNS/MEADOWS OF ROUND LAKE
Resolution R147-92 appeoving peemit .............. 6
SPECIAL USE PERMIT/AREA IDENTIFICATION SIGNS/WEYBRIDGE
Resolution R148-92 appeoving peemit .......
. . . . . .
6
VARIANCE/1332 137TH LANE NW/S. HAM
Resolution R149-92 appeoving vaeiance
ADOPT ORDINANCE/DEFERRED ASSESSMENT POLICY
CONTRACTOR PROBLEM/IP92-8
Resolution R150-92 declaeing conteactoe in default. . .
Motion foe Change Oedee No. 1 extending completion date
6
6
7
7
WDE SITE/TEMPORARY STRUCTURE
. . . . . . . . . .
7
NON-DISCUSSION ITEMS
Resolution R151-92 appointing election judges . . . . .
Road Commi t tee Repoet ....................
Resolution R152-92 appeoving functional eeclassification of
Minoe Aeteeials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Resolution R153-92 awaeding bid/92-10/Pheasant Meadows.
Resolution R154-92 awaeding bid/92-15/Hidden Ceeek East 5th
Resolution R155-92 appeovlng plans & specs/Well #4
Resolution R156-92 appeoving final payment/91-19 .
Resolution R157-92 appeovlng final payment/91-25
Resolution R158-92 eescinding R78-6
Resolution R159-92 designating depositoey . . .
Receive July Financial Statements
MOTION to appeove newslettee conteact .
. . . . . . . . . .
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT/WIATRAK vs J. LUND CONSTRUCTION (Tabled)
PIR FUND REIMBURSEMENT
Resolution R160-92 appeoving teansfee
. . . . . . . . .
8
SPECIAL MEETING/INTERVIEW FINANCE DIRECTOR CANDIDATES (Aug. 25) 9
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9
;,,1/,0')
\1'\ )
'",,-,/
~,~~::~:..::;.-.......-
CITY of ANDOVER
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - AUGUST 18, 1992
MINUTES
The Regulae Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andovee City Council was called
to oedee by Mayoe Ken Oettel on August 18, 1992, 7:30 p.m., at at the
Andovee City Hall, 1685 Ceosstown Boulevaed NW, Andovee, Minnesota.
Councilmembees peesent:
Councilmembee absent:
Also peesent:
McKelvey, Peeey, Smith
Jacobson
City Attoeney, William G. Hawkins
TKDA Engineee, John Davidson
City Plannee, Dave Caelbeeg
City Administeatoe, James Scheantz
Othees
AGENDA APPROVAL
Add the following items: 7a. Conteactoe PeoblemJ'IP92-8: 7b. WDE Site/
Tempoeaey Steuctuee: 22. Special Meeting Date/lnteeview Finance
Dieectoe Candidates.
MOTION by Peeey, Seconded by McKelvey, to appeove the Agenda as
amended. Motion caeeied on a 4-Yes, l-Absent <Jacobson) vote.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
August 4, 1992: Page 2, Staff eepoeted the published woeding foe
Oedinance 8, Section 8.07 diffeeed feom the Minutes. The
oedinance was publised as "...one sign pee development is
allowed by Special Use Peemit. Additional signs shall be
eeviewed by the Andovee Review Committee and the Planning and
Zoning Commission and appeoved by the City Council."
MOTION by Peeey, Seconded by Smith, the Minutes of August 4, 1992,
as peesented, noting the change eepoeted by Staff. Motion caeeied on
a 4-Yes, l-Absent (Jacobson) vote.
APPROVE REVISED FEASIBILITY STUDY/wATT'S GARDEN ACRES
Mayoe Oettel explained the eevision includes the stoem sewee
assessment levied by the City of Coon Rapids against the City of
Andovee. The aeea west of Jay Steeet was peeviously assessed, but the
aeea east of Jay Steeet must still be assessed.
MOTION by Smith, Seconded by McKelvey, the Resolution eeceiving
amendments <Page 4A and Exhibit E) to the feasibility eepoet foe the
impeovement of stoem sewee, Peoject No. 92-18 in the Watt's Gaeden
Acees/Jay Steeet NW Aeea. (See Resolution R144-92) Motion caeeied on
a 4-Yes, l-Absent (Jacobson) vote.
Regulae Andovee City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 18. 1992
Page 2
PUBLIC HEARING/IP92-18/JAY STREET
7:36 p.m. Me. Davidson eeviewed the feasibility eepoet foe the
impeovement of sanitaey sewee, watee, stoem sewee and steeet
impeovement along Jay Steeet between 133ed Avenue noeth to the
peoposed Commeecial Boulevaed. Most of the peopeety in that vicinity
is being consideeed foe ueban development. The Council must decide
whethee to do the impeovement now oe wait until the developments ace
in. This peoceduee allows the Council to establish an estimated
assessment aceoss those ten-acee paecels that ace developing into
plats so the peopoetionate shaee can be assessed when they ace
plqtted. The City would then hold that money in esceow until the
steeet is impeoved.
Me. Davidson explained the peeliminaey design of the peoJect is based
on poposed steeet configueations on, both sides of Jay Steeet. The
estimated total peoJect cost is $189,400, which would be assessed on a
lineae feont footage basis because of the multiple owneeships of the
peopeety. The assessment would applY to a typical ueban lot depth
along both sides of Jay Steeet and would be appeoximatelY
$8.010.65/unit foe an aveeage 80-foot feontage lot.
The heaelng was then opened foe publiC testimony.
Hubeet Smith. 13309 Jav Steeet NW - was conceened about the peopeety
behind him. The land was taken as easement fo~ the 100-yeaeflood and
was not meant to be a wet pond. It woeked beautifullY foe the fiest
yeae: howevee, it has not been maintained and now is not deaining
peopeelY. He talked to Public Woeks about it and eecognizes they do
not have the staff to keep eveeything maintained. If the stoem sewee
feom the noeth is consteucted to deain to this pond, he feaeed it
would staet to flood his peopeety. Me. Davidson stated they can
do the final pipe design so it will not flood that aeea. They will
not Just dump watee into the pond without having some assueance that
i t wi II woek.
Jeeey Windschitl. 3640 152nd Lane - complimented the Council and
Staff foe staetlng this peoject. All except the Smith peopeety is
eithee owned by developees oe is being negotiated foe development, so
these plans ace impoetant to them. He asked if the Council is looking
foe a petition feom the developee to p~oceed. Mayoe Oettel felt that
may be helpful feom a teaditional standpoint of wanting a maJoeity in
favoe of a peoJect: howevee, the Council is undee the impeession that
most of the peopeety is owned by developees who want and need this
peoject foe theie developments.
Me. Windschit1 - felt the peoJect should go in befoee the
developments. Me. Scheantz stated the City would like to see all of
them done togethee.
Regulae Andovee City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 18. 1992
Page 3
(Public Heaeing,'IP92-18/Jay Steeet. Continued)
Me. Wlndschltl - explained when the stoem sewee assessment was
levied In 1989. the amount passed on to Andovee feom Coon Rapids
diffees feom what Andovee assessed the eesidents. The assessment also
included a lateeal assessment. so It appeaes the aeea was assessed for
lateeal woek that is yet to be consteucted. Theee is a geeat deal of
confusion on this assessment. It appeaes the cost of $3,200 pee lot
foe stoem sewee does not include pondlng. Me. Wlndschltl undeestands
that Coon Rapids will give Andovee ceedit foe the lot expendituees on
these paecels. He stated It will be helpful If the two cities would
come to an undeestanding of what is expected of the cities and the
developees. He also undeestood that he and Me. Stanton should not be
assessed foe any lot chaeges whatsoevee foe stoem sewee.
Me. Scheantz stated Coon RapidS will give Andovee ceedlt for woek that
was not done. He will look Into the issue fuethee.
Me. Smith - eeviewed the past events eelative to the consteuction of
133ed. the puechase of the pond. and the development possibilities as
it affected him. Now he is a single-family home on a laege lot in
this aeea which cannot be subdivided. He is not asking foe the
peoject. but he is not opposed to It elthee: howevee. he felt he
should be teeated the same as any othee single family unit. If
assessed on the size of his lot. he would have to pay almost $17.000.
while the other lots in the aeea will be assessed $8.000. As a single
lot. he didn't feel he could eecoup the $17,000 cost of the peoject
and asked to be teeated like the othee units In the aeea.
Me. Davidson stated It has been the policy of the City to teeat
eveeyone equally foe equal benefit. Council thought that because It is
an undividable lot. the assessment should be equivalent to one unit.
Sue Hurst. 13440 Jav Steeet - eespected the eight of othees in the
aeea to develop. but they have a ten-acee paecel and they do not feel
it Is feasible to entee into a conteact with a developee at this time.
They have 328 feet of eoad feontage. which would amount to about a
$30.000 assessment. That Is In addition to the $17.000 aleeady levied
on theie paecel foe stoem sewee. At the July meeting. she was told
the Council did not want to foece anyone to develop: but she felt that
they would be foeced .to do something they don't want to do with that
type of assessment. She didn't know If it was feasible to defee the
assessment foe theie paecel oe stop It at theie southern lot line.
Me. Davidson thought the entice aeea could be seeved with sanitaey
sewee feom the south and could stop at the southeen lot line. Mayor
Oettel noted the peoblem if Commeeclal Boulevaed Is consteucted. it
does not seem feasible to leave 300 feet of steeet incomplete. He did
undeestand the peoblem of the laege assessment against that paecel if
they did not wish to develop.
Regulae Andovee City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 18. 1992
Page 4
(Public Heaeing/IP92-18/Jay Steeet. Continued)
Ms. Huest - asked if theie peopeety would be assessed foe Commeecial
Boulevaed if it euns along theie noeth peopeety line. Mayoe Oettel
didn't think theee would be an assessment because theee would be no
access to it. The southeen eoute would peovide a buffee between the
eesidential peopeety and the businesses theee now. and that is why
that location is being consideeed. HopefullY the Council will eeceive
the appeaisals in the next few weeks so a deteemination can be made on
the location of Commeecial Boulevaed.
Ms. Huest - stated they are a single peopeety ownee and they pee fee
to 'live in theie home, consideeing It a full-developed lot. She would
like to see theie assessments defeeeed until the time is eight for
them to develop. She didn't want to have to sell theie home to pay
foe the assessments.
Jim Stanton. 1926 127th Lane. Coon Rapids - owns the peopeety east
of Jay Steeet dieectly aceoss feom the Huests. It is not a 10-acee
paecel. but he does want utilities peovlded to it. If it is not
peovided with this peoject as was peoposed to Ms. Huest. he would have
to wait until the utilities come feom the noeth. He felt It is moee
prudent to being the sewee up feom the south and to finish Jay Steeet
up to Commeecial Boulevaed. He is also willing to combine that paecel
with othees in the aeea foe development pueposes.
Clarence Wiekus. 14345 Jay Street - owns a 7.5-acee paecel and is
woeking on a sale to Tony Emmeeich. who is designing a sketch plan foe
ueban lot development. One of the issues is the location and
consteuction of Commeecial Boulevaed. He ageees with the need foe
this peoject and having the utilities available.
Tony Emmeelch. developee - owns oe is negotiating foe most of the
land east of Jay Steeet. He stated they will have lots feont on Jay
Steeet and will need the sewee in theee. This will take caee of all
of the peopeety up to one of the peoposed alteenates foe Commeecial
Boulevaed. He will be beinging in a sketch plan within one oe two
weeks. Me. Davidson again stated that entice aeea could be seeved with
sanltaey sewee feom the south. He said it would be veey helpful if
they had the sketch plans of all the popeeties to woek with In
designing the peoJect.
Council discussion was that a decision on the location of the proposed
Commeecial Boulevaed needs to made veey soon, as its location affects
this peoject, noting the peos and cons of locating the eoad to divide
the eesidential and commeecial peopeeties.
Mr. Wirkus - has been thinking about the location of Commeecial
Boulevaed. He would not be opposed to have the eoad as a buffee
between eesidential and business, feeling it can be made to woek.
Regulae Andovee City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 18, 1992
Page 5
(Public Heaeing;'IP92-18/Jay Steeet, Continued)
In discussing the possibiiity of closing off Jay Steeet feom the
commeecial aeea, Me. Scheantz eecommended it eemain open unless it
becomes a peoblem. Then the City can considee closing it.
Because of the past and peesent clecumstances, Councilmembee Peeey
peoposed that theee be no fuethee assessment to the Smith peopeety.
Me. Smith appeeciated the consideeation but said it wouid be faie that
he pay foe one unit Just like all the othees. The only assessment he
felt he shouldn't have to pay is the one foe stoem sewee.
Council also noted that the situation on the Huest peopeety seems to
change all the time. The CIty eeceived a sketch plan foe subdivision
a month oe so ago but now they ace being asked to considee the ten
acees as one paecel.
Ms. Huest - explained the negotiations with the potential developee
b.oke down because of theie gaeage being located in the peoposed
eoadway of the plat and because of the conceen of not being able to
get financing foe the lots that would abut the junkyaed. Council felt
the location of Commeecial Blvd. would impact that heavily. Also, it
may be possible to woek aeound the gaeage with the eoadway.
Council summaeized that the location of the peoposed Commeecial
Boulevaed must be deteemined, that the assessment to the Huest
peopeety must be consideeed. and that the assessment to the Smith
peopeety would be foe one unit because it is an undividable paecel.
If oedeeed this evening, theee would be a pending assessment on the
peopeeties. Council felt that any sale of land would be Inc.eased to
covee the pending assessment, so it would not penalize those still
negotiating to sell thele land. The peoJect would not be assessed
until some time in 1993.
MOTION by McKelvey, Seconded by Peeey, to close the public heaeing.
Motion caeeied on a 4-Yes, 1-Absent (Jacobson) vote.
MOTION by Peeey, Seconded by McKelvey, a Resolution oedeeing the
impeovement of sanitaey sewee, wateemain, st~eet and stoem deain foe
the aeea of Watt's Gaeden Acees, Peoject No. 92-18. as peesented: but
ask that the Minutes cleaely eeflect the conceen of the Council fo~
the peopeeties held by the Smiths and the Huests. (See Resolution
R145-92) Motion caeeied on a 4-Yes, 1-Absent (Jacobson) vote. 9:06 pm
SPECIAL USE PERMIT/REAL ESTATE SIGNS/MEADOWS OF ROUND LAKE
MOTION by Smith, Seconded by Peeey, a Resolution geantlng the
Special Use Peemit eequest of Nedegaaed Consteuction Company, Inc., to
eeect two eeal estate signs to be locateed at 14325 Round Lake
Boulevaed NW and 14661 Kiowa Steeet NW as peesented. (See Resolution
R146-92) Motion caeeied on a 4-Yes, 1-Absent (Jacobson) vote.
Regulae Andovee City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 18, 1992
Page 6
SPECIAL USE PERMIT/AREA IDENTIFICATION SIGNS/MEADOWS OF ROUND LAKE
MOTION by Smith, Seconded by McKelvey, the Resolution geanting the
Special Use Peemit eequest of Nedegaaed Consteuction Company, Inc.,
to eeect two aeea identification signs as peesented. (See Resolution
R147-92) Motion caeeied on a 4-Yes, l-Absent (Jacobson) vote.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT/AREA IDENTIFICATION SIGN/WEYBRIDGE
MOTION by McKelvey, Seconded by Smith, a Resolution geanting the
Special Use Peemit eequest of Ashfoed Development Coepoeation, Inc.,
to eeect an aeea identification sign on the peopeety located at 14485
Xeon Steeet NW, as peesented. (See Resolution R148-92) Motion caeeied
on a 4-yes, l-Absent (Jacobson) vote.
Councilmembee Peeey stated that some of the tempoeaey identification
signs to the developments ace staeting to look shabby. She asked that
in those cases, the developees be notified and asked to coeeect the
peoblem. Me. Caelbeeg ageeed.
VARIANCE/1332 137TH LANE NW/S. HAM
Me. Carlbeeg eeviewed the vaeiance eequest to allow foe the
consteuction and placement of a deck enceoaching into the eequieed
10-foot sideyaed setback feom an inteeioe lot line. He suggested the
Planning Commission could look at eequieing a laegee setback in cases
wheee the deck will be built on the side of the house so it does not
enceoach in the setback. Mayoe Oettel felt it may be bettee to handle
it theough the Building Depaetment eathee than by eequieing setbacks.
Dave Almgeen, Building Official, stated they can look at eequieing a
laegee setback on the side when the building plan calls foe a sliding
glass dooe on the side assuming a deck will be built at some time. Oe
they may eequiee the deck to be built at the time the house is built.
He will eeview it fuethee.
MOTION by McKelvey, Seconded by Smith, a Resolution geanting the
vaeiance eequest of Susan Ham to Oedinance No.8, Section 6.02, which
eequiees a ten-foot sideyaed setback feom the inteeioe lot line to
allow foe the placement of a deck enceoaching foue feet into the
eequieed sideyaed setback. (See Resolution R149-92) Motion caeeied
on a 4-Yes, l-Absent (Jacobson) vote.
ADOPT ORDINANCE/DEFERRED ASSESSMENT POLICY
MOTION by Peeey, Seconded by Smith, Oedinance No. 101 peoviding foe
the defeeeal of special assessments foe senioe citizens and eetieed
disabled homeownees as peesented. Motion caeeied on a 4-yes, l-Absent
(Jacobson) vote.
Regulae Andovee City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 18. 1992
Page 7
CONTRACTOR PROBLEM/IP92-8
Mayoe Oettel explained the conteactoe has decided not to do the sewee
teunk peoject coming out of Coon Ceeek which has been delayed because
of the elght-of-way acquisition. The peoblem the City has is to get
the peoject in the geound befoee the pumping begins at the landfill.
The Attoeney has stated that technically the conteactoe has defaulted
and that legal peoceedings should begin. The suggestion is to
negotiate with the second lowest biddee about doing the job.
Me. Davdison also asked that the Council considee Change Oedee No.1
to the conteact to extend the completion date.
MOTION by Smith, Seconded by McKelvey, to declaee Hank Weidema
Consteuction foe Peoject 92-8 in default of the conteact and that we
dieect Staff and City Attoeney to take the appeopeiate measuees: and
have the consulting engineee begin negotiations with the second
biddee. (See Resolution R150-92) Motion caeeied on a 4-Yes, l-Absent
(Jacobson) vote.
MOTION by Peeey, Seconded by Smith, inteoducing Change Ordee No.1
to Peoject 92-8 extending the final completion date to the peoject to
Novembee 6, 1992, with the undeestanding that the Hank Weidema
Consteuction wil I be deleted and the appeopeiate consteuction fiem's
name inseeted. Motion caeeled on a 4-yes, l-Absent (Jacobson) vote.
WDE SITE/TEMPORARY STRUCTURE
Mayoe Oettel explaIned that those cleanIng up the Waste DIsposal
Engineeeing SIte ace asking to be allowed to consteuct a temporaey
buIldIng to house the pump. The steuctuee would be eemoved as soon as
the peemanent building is installed, which is expected within two
yeaes. Though the City has no jurisdiction. the question is whethee
they should be eequieed to go theough the Special Use Peemit peocess,
which they ace wil ling to do.
Aftee some discussion, the Council ageeed to have them go theough the
Special Use Peemit peocess so the City knows the size and location of
the steuctuee. etc.
NON-DISCUSSION ITEMS
MOTION by Smith, Seconded by McKelvey, a block motion for Items:
9. Appoint Election JUdges (See Resolution R151-92 - NOTE: the
Revised Resolution befoee the Council)
11. Road Committee Repoet
12. Functional Reclassification of Minoe Aeteeials (See Resolution
R152-92)
Regulae Andovee City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 18, 1992
Page 8
(Non-Discussion Items. Continued)
13. Awaed Bid/IP92-10/Pheasant Meadows (See Resolution R153-92)
14. Awaed Bid/IP92-15/Hidden Ceeek East 5th Addition (See
Resolution R154-92)
15. Appeove Plans & Specs/Well #4 (See Resolution R155-92)
16. Appeove Final Payment/IP91-19 (See Resolution R156-92)
17. Appeove Final Payment/IP91-25 (See Resolution R157-92)
18. Rescind Resolution R78-6 (See Resolution R158-92)
20. Designating Depositoey (See Resolution R159-92)
21. Receive July Financial Statements
Motion caeeied on a 4-yes, l-Absent (Jacobson) vote.
APPROVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT/WIATRAK VS J. LUND CONSTRUCTION
Dave Almgeen, Building Official, explained in Lund's 5th Addition.
theee weee theee lots that didn't comply with the oedinance for
buildability of 39,000 squaee feet. The City held back $12,000 out of
the 4th Addition foe vaeious eeasons. which the City still has. This
settlement means the City ageees to the buildability of the theee lots
with less than 39,000 squaee feet. This is no cost to the City. but
it allows the three lots to be build with only 6,000 feet of buildable
aeea.
The Council had some conceens and questions about the proposed
settlement, wishing to discuss it with the City Attoeney. It was
ageeed that the item be tabled to the next eegulae meeting.
APPROVE NEWSLETTER CONTRACT
Council noted the price inceease feom $75 to $125 pee page to publish
the Andovee City news in the Andovee Expeess. It was noted that many
residents identify with the Andovee Expeess as the City's newsletter.
Council then ageeed to the peoposed conteact: howevee. the numbee of
pages pee month is to be eeduced to one or two pages.
MOTION by Smith, Seconded by McKelvey, to appeove the new newslettee
conteact foe the Andovee Expeess and dieect City Staff to see what we
can make the amount of actual peint we ace putting in the Expeess less
to hold the costs down. Motion caeeied on a 4-Yes, l-Asent (Jacobson)
vote.
ADOPT RESOLUTION/PIR FUND REIMBURSEMENT
MOTION by Peeey, Seconded by Smith, the Resolution as peesented
teansfeeelng $68,721.78 feom the Peemanent Impeovement Revolving Fund
to the impeovements unfinanced fund. (See Resolution R160-92) Motion
caeeied on a 4-Yes. l-Absent (Jacobson) vote.
Regulae Andovee City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 18, 1992
Page 9
SPECIAL MEETING DATE/INTERVIEW FINANCE DIRECTOR CANDIDATES
Council ageeed to inteeview the Finance Dleectoe candidates on Tuesday
evening, August 25, 7:30 p.m. eithee at the City Hall oe Flee Station
No.1. Me. Scheantz was asked to schedule the meeting.
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
MOTION by Peeey, Seconded by Smith, the Schedule of Bills dated
8-14-92 in the amount of $463,484.15. Motion caeeied on a 4-Yes.
l-Absent (Jacobson) vote.
MOTION by Smith to adJouen. Mayoe Oettel declaeed the meeting
adjouened at 9:52 p.m.
Respectfully submitted.
~~~Ck-l
Marcella A. Peach
Recoeding Seceetaey
ANOKA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
1900 THIRD AVENUE SOUTH
ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303
612.421.0600
~t \ql
q ) 1 )
Colonial Hall- 1904
18, August, 1992
City of Andover
1685 NW Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Council Members,
What a fast year it has been! It doesn't seem
possible that it is BUDGET TIME once again.
We, at the Anoka County Historical Society, have
been very busy preserving history! As the Community
grows, so do our commitments. This is an important respon-
sibility and we need your help more than ever before. The
portion of our budget which comes from the County has been
cut 18%. This is a serious setback to our already limited
funds.
Your investment in
the historical society,
will be preserved.
your Community's history, through
is good insurance that YOUR history
"
We are actively seeking memberships which also help
to support our cause. Bookmarks listing the various member-
ship catagories have been included in this letter for your
convenience.
Thank you!
:i:Je~y, 0
~dalw~
'~at Schwappach
Museum Director
PS:ch
Enc.
~
e-Cql1lqy
. .
TKDA
TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
1500 MERITOR TOWER
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUl, MINNESOTA 551 01.2140
PHONE:61212g2-4400 FAX:61212g2-<J083
August 21,1992
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, MiImesota
Re: Engineering Matters
Regular Council Meeting 8-18-92
Andover,Mit1nesota
Commission No. 9140-992
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
The following is a summary of engineering matters discussed and action taken at the above
referenced meetiIlg.
1. Public Hearing - City Project 92-18 - Watt's Garden Acres - Jay Street - Comm. No.
10213
Mr. Davidson presented the feasibility report for the above referenced project. The
iInprovements to Jay Street from proposed Commercial Drive south to 133rd Avenue NW
would provide sanitary sewer, watennains, storm sewer and street improvement. TIle
benefit would be assessed to lots along the adjacent to Jay Street.
The estimated cost for a lot 80' x 150' size is $8,010.65.
Owners and developers of several lots affected were present and generally were in favor of
the improvement.
Property owner Hubert Smith was concerned that he be assessed for only one (1) benefitted
unit.
Property owner Susan Hurst indicated that they are not presently agreeable to subdivide
and requested a deferred assessment or no assessment until they subdivide.
Council Action:
The council received the revised feasibility report as presented.
The Council by resolution authorized preparation of plans and specifications for the project
as presented with sewer to extend from 133rd Avenue NW to proposed Commercial Drive.
The Council acknowledged the concerns of resident property owners Smith and Hurst.
Honorable Mayor and City Council
August 21,1992
Page 2
2. Trunk Sanitary Sewer to Pinewood Estates - City Project 92-8 - Corom. No. 10151
The contractor, Hank Weidema Excavating Company, has defaulted under his bid security
to process contract documents and accept award of contract, in accordance with Council
action oOune 16, 1989. (see attachments)
Council Action:
The Council took action to annul the Notice of Award and ordered the bid security of the
bidder (Hank Weidema Excavating Company) be forfeited.
The Council authorized City staff to negotiate with the second low bidder (Bonine
Excavating Company) to prepare contracts for their second low bid of $170,011.20.
The Council authorized the extension of the completion date for said contract to November
6, 1992.
3. Consent Agenda:
The Council approved the non-discussion items a.<: follows:
A. ProL 92-10 - Pheasant Meadows - Corom. No. 10174:
The Council approved award of contract by resolution to "Old is Gold Construction
Company" in the amount of their low bid of $155,206.50.
B. ProL 92-15 - Hidden Creek East 5th Addition - Comm. No. 10197:
The Council approved award of contract by resolution to "Hydrocon, Inc." in the
amount of their low bid of $184.547.60.
C. Proj. 92-13 - Water Well No.4 - Corom. No. 10212:
The Coullcil approved plans and specifications and set the date for opening bids at
10:00 A.M., Monday, September 14,1992.
D. ProL 91-19 - Crosstown Boulevard Watennain Exknsion - COllun. No. 9963:
The Council approved by resolution final payment to Erickson Construction
Company in the amount of $16,360.86; Compensating Change Order No.1 in the
amount of $12,661.30; and Change Order No.2 in the amount of $1,096.38.
The fmal contract cost is $229.168.96. The engineers feasibility report estimate
was $247,700 (4-29-91).
Honorable Mayor and City Council
August 21, 1992
Page 3
E. Proi. 91-25 - Hidden Creek East 4th Addition - Comm. No. 10055:
The Council approved by resolution the fmal payment to Mille Lacs Contracting,
Inc. in the amount of $9,601.42; and Compensating Change Order No.2 in the
anlOunt of $394.95.
The fmal contract cost is $85,492.89. The engineering feasibility report estimate
was $110,992.50 (10-24-91).
The engineer was excused at approximately 10:00 P.M.
Sincerely,
~e~
JLD/mha
,
4.3 On request Owner will provide each Bidder access to the site to conduct such
investigations and tests as each Bidder deems necessaJ)' for submission of his Bid.
4.4 The lands upon which the Work is to be perlormed. rights,of-way for access thereto
and other lands designated for use by Contractor in perlorming the Work are identified
in Section 01010. "Summary of Work".
4.5 The submission of a Bid will constitute an Incontrovertible representation by the Bidder
that he has complied with every requirement of this Article 4 and that the Contract
Documents are sufficient in scope and detail to indicate and convey understanding of
an terms and conditions for perlormance of the Work.
5. INTERPRETATIONS: All questions about the meaning or intent of the Contract Documents shall
be submitted to Engineer in writing. Replies will be issued by Addenda mailed or delivered to all
parties recorded by Engineer as having received the Bidding Documents. Questions received
less than four days prior to the date for opening of Bids will not be answered. Only questions
answered by formal written Addenda will be binding. Oral and other interpretations or
clarifications will be without legal effect
6. BID SECURITY:
6.1 Bid security shall be made payable to the Owner. in an amount of stated in the
Advertisement for Bids of the Bidder's maximum Bid price and in the form of a certified
or bank check or a Bid Bond. Issued by a Surety, meeting the requirements of
paragraph 5.1 of the General Conditions.
6.2 The Bid Security of the Successful Bidder will be retained until such Bidder has
executed the Agreement and fumished the required Contract Security, whereupon it
will be retumed; if the successful Bidder fails to execute and deliver the Agreement and
fumish the required Contract Security within 15 days of the Notice of Award, Owner
may annul the Notice of Award and the Bid Security of that Bidder will be forleited. The
Bid Security of any Bidder whom Owner believes to have a reasonable chance of
receiving the award (generally the second and third low bidder) may be retained by
Owner until the earlier of the seventh day after the "effective date of the Agreement"
(which term is defined in the General Conditions) by Owner to Contractor and the
required Contract Security is fumlshed or the sixty-first day after the Bid opening. Bid
security of other bidders will be retumed within seven days of the bid opening.
7. CONTRACT TIME: The number of days within which. or the date by which, the work is to be
completed (the contract time) Is set forth in the Bid Form and will be included in the Project
Requirements, Document 00820.
8. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: Previsions for liquidated damages. are set forth in the Project
Requirements, Document 00820.
9. SUBSTITUTE MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT: The Contract. if awarded, will be on the basis of
material and equipment described in the Drawings or specified in the Specifications without
consideration of possible substitute or "or-equal" items. Whenever it is indicated in the Drawings
or specified in the Specifications that a substitute or "or-equal" item of material or equipment may
be fumlshed or used by Contractor if acceptable to Engineer. application for such acceptance
will not be considered by Engineer until after the "effective date of the Agreement". The
procedure for submittal of any such application by Contractor and consideration by Engineer is
set forth in paragraphs 6.7, 6.7.1 and 6.7.2 of the General Conditions which may be
supplemented in the Supplementary Conditions or Project Requirements.
MS 12-89
00100,2
~fi"''''''''~
.
I
I
i
.
fj
I
I
g
II
4.2.4, ENGINEER"s Re,.;en':' ENGINEER will
promptly review Ihe peninent conditions. determine the
neeessity of obtaining additional explorations or lests with
respect thereto and advise OWNER in writing (with a copy
to CONTRACTOR) of ENGINEER's findings and con'
c1usions.
4.2.5. Possible Document Change: If ENGINEER
concludes that there is a material error in the Contraet
Documents or that because of newly discovered condi.
tions a change in the Contract Documents is required. a
Work Directive Change or a Change Order will be issued
as provided in Article 10 to reftect and document the
consequences of the inaccuracy or difference.
4.2.6. possiblr Pria and Time AdjuslmenTs: In each
such case. an increase or decrease in the Contract Price
or an extension or shonening of the Contract Time. or any
combination thereof. will be allowable to the extent that
they are allributable to any such inaccuracy or difference.
If OWNER and CONTRACTOR are unable to agree as to
the amount or length thereof. a claim may be made therefor
as provided in Articles 11 and 12.
Physical Conditions-Underground Facilities:
4.3.1. Slrown ()r Indicaltd: The information and data
shown or indicated in the Contract Documents with respect
to existing Underground Facilities at or contiguous to the
site is based on information and data furnished to OWNER
or ENGINEER by the owners of such Underground Facil.
itieS or by others. Unless it is otherwise expressly pro-
vided in the Supplementary Conditions:
4.3.1.1. OWNER and ENGINEER shall not be
responsible for the accuracy or completeness of any
such information or data:'and.
4.3.1.2. CONTRACTOR shall have full responsi-
bility for reviewing and checking all such information
and data. for locating all Underground Facilities shown
or indicated in the Contract Documents. for coordina-
tion ofthe Work with the owners of such Underground
Facilities during construction. for the safety and pro-
tection thereof as provided in pangraph 6.20 and
repairing any damage thereto resulting from the Work.
the cost of all of which will be considered as having
been included in the Contr1lct Price.
4.3.2. Not Shown or Indica ltd. If an Underground
Facility is uncovered or revealed at or contiguous to the.
site which was not shown or indicated in the Contract
Documents and which CONTRACTOR could not reason,
ably have been expected to be aware of. CONTRACTOR
shall. promptly after becoming aware thereof and before ."
performing any Work affected thereby (except in an emer-
gency as permitted by paragraph 6.22). identify the owner
of such Underground Facility and give wrillen notice thereof
to that owner and to OWNER and ENGINEER. ENGI-
NEER will promptly review the Underground Facility to
determine the extent to which the Contract Documents
should be modified to reftect and document the conse-
quences of the existence of the Underground Facility. and
the Contract Documents will be amended or supplemented
to Ihe extent necessary. During such time. CONTRAC-
TOR shall be responsible for the s)fety and protection of
such Underground Facility as provided in paragraph 6.20.
CONTRACTOR shall be allowed an increase in the Con-
tract Price or an extension of the Contract Time. or both.
to the extent that they are allributable to the e'tistence of
any Underground Facility that was not shown or indicated
in the Contract Documents and which CONTRACTOR
could not reasonably have been expected to be aware of.
If the parties arc unable to agree as to the amount or length
thereof. CONTRACTOR may make a claim therefor as
provided in Articles 11 and 12.
R rfrrtnet poinlI:
4.4. OWNER shall provide engineering surveys to estab-
lish reference points for construction which in ENGINEER's
judgment are necessary to enable CONTRACTOR to proceed
w'ith the Work. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for lay-
ing out the Work (unless otherwise specified in the General
Requirements). shall protect and preserve the established
reference points and shall make no changes or relocations
withoUllhe prior wrillen approval of OWNER. CONTRAC-
TOR shall report to ENGINEER whenever any reference
point is lost or destroyed or requires relocation because of
necessary changes in grades or locations. and shall be respon-
sible for the accurate replacement or relocation of such ref-
erence points by professionally qualified personnel.
1
ARTICLE 5-BONDS AND INSURANCE
PerfOnn/lnet and Othtr Bonds:
5.1. CONTRACTOR shall furnish performance and pay.
ment Bonds. each in an amount at least equal to the Contract
Price as security for the faithful performance and payment of
all CONTRACTOR's obligations under ihe Contract Docu-
m~nts. These Bonds shall remain in effect at least until one
year after the date when final payment becomes due. except
as otherwise provided by Law or Regulation or by the Con-
tract Documents. CONTRACTOR shall also furnish such
other Bonds as are required by the SupplementarY Condi-
tions. All Bonds shall be in the forms prescribed by Law or
Regulation or by the Contract Documents and be executed
by such sureties as arc named in the current list of "Com.
panies Holding Certificates of Authority as Acceptable Sure-
ties on Federal Bonds and as Acceptable Reinsuring Com-
panies" as published in Circular 570 (amended) by the Audit
Staff Bureau of Accounts. U.S. Treasury Department. All
Bonds signed by an agent must be accompanied by a certified
copy of the authority to act. :
5.2. If the surety on any Bond furnished by CONTRAC-
TOR is declared a bankrupt or becomes insolvent or its right
to do business is terminated in any state where any part of
h
~'X
\-l ,
,
,
~ (C
1/ / /q v
AGENDA
i
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRIC
BOARD OF MANAGERS
August 24, 1992
7:30 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Open Mike
POLICY ITEMS
4. Approval of Minutes
5; MAWD Resolutions
ECE1V
PERMIT ITEMS
6. Berg driveway to property (PAN 92-56)
7. Pheasant Meadows Utilities (PAN 92-57)
8. Hidden Creek 5th Addition (PAN 92-58)
9. CSAH 14: Between Radisson & Lexington (PAN 92-19)
10. Blaine Sr. Hi Athletic Fields (PAN 92-59)
11. Eagle Trail Crooked Lake Ele. (PAN 92-60)
DISCUSSION ITEMS
12. Creekview Pond Seeding and Mulching
13. Park Construction Issue
14. Budget Update
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
NEW BUSINESS
ADJOURN
",'
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS' MEETING
August 10, 1992
The Board of Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed District held
their regular meeting on August 10. 1992 at the Bunker Hills
Activities Center.
.}. '1'..':
~{;' .
,..-'..
, i.2;."
......
:';':
.r;
..-.
:i:-:.
.. .
Present: Bob Boyum. Reggie Hemmes, Paul Williams. Absent: Eldon ..;:'..~.'."
Hentges. LuEllen Richmond. '
. .
Staff: Tim Kelly. Kathy Tingelstad. Michelle Ulrich, Ed
Matthiesen.
~,:'.' :{:~i'
. :"'] . :./J!r (
. ~~~ . \ ~~
, "'~~'1-:~'
the Agenda: Moved by Williams. seconded by Boyum. ,,';c.-
with three yells (Hemmes. Boyum and Williams) and ,.... .3'!f/.-,-,:""~'~,~,
. . ;:>.....~j4,~iifi~i t:.;..~~.t~;~~~.~{~~.. ~
./ ..':~ ~"'~'." .l,O>'t~::I:.!t'~.~;:~~~.~.~-.
3. Open Mike: No one WllS present to speak on this item. "'" -:.:;.;:.,t~:V~:';~~'~l:~:i
~ 1 :::,:::~ of Jo 1 Y 27. "" HI 0"0" Ho" 00 to "","VO .1 OU~O~ f'~;;fl':';'''&\X!z'
including notes on the Executive Session, was moved by Williams,
seconded by Boyum. Motion carried with three yeas (Hemmes, Boyum
and Williams) and no nays.
~:~. ~::<:~:~~~.~~>.,":".'
. .'~:~'" -'f .
:..... . ..~''''':-~.. '.
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:37 p.m.
2. APproval of
Motion carried
no nays.
5. Receive Monthly Financial Statements: Kelly presented this
item. He noted that the District received the first tax
eettlement from the County and State. Motion to receive the
report was moved by williams, seconded by Boyum. Motion carried
with three yeas (Hemmes, Boyum and Williams) and no nays.
. , . seconded by Williams. Motion carried
: ;,:"'.,: Boyum and Wi 111 sms) and no nays.
';-4; ~: . ~. : ~.
.0 .. .:, Check
~'~~"" '~_, .. 3541
'..; L:;:~'iS~;~tf~: ~;:~
;:., ""'.~ "...<" '.~ ":""-3544
",. ""-'''.1-' ,,,, ,.;,.1'""
".." ,'; ,~. ''''''~;'''''~r3545
\,' ~ . " . :~".;~-:::"'~1' 354e
I "~.;.....,...&:;'. ..-" .' 3547
..... . 3548
3549
3550
3551
3552
3553
'3554
3555
3558
3~~7
3~~8
3~~9
3580
3581
~~:'. :::;~~:~'.: .
, " .
i~:~}~::;:. <: : .
..' r .
"'-",.'
'21'.
-' .
7;.;.-'.
c,..
,
. ,
"'.\ ,,,,~ '. ;
';';." "";;,~;:~ft:
. , .... . ..': '~"~~I':'
....~~... <' r:.:~?.~~~~~P:
J~ ':. ,~::tt,.,.;~. .~,
"-':.. " '" '. -. '~" -
";\~~ ,-.~:,~}~~r, :.:.
.~ - ;. ~}f' ~.~:...
, : ,; :-.K.i'"~' :~';"f~';;i~i'
'.~, < ~ ' ....'-~' :-....'4.__~:;(,~~. '4::
,.' ...;",', ~"'_""'k"~. "~
~,~ ,.. ",' , \ of w.~ 1.., . .-........ f,.
~; ........ \~... .rzir ~"t '.{"1..~-:~~~i..
.";.~'i .':::):':;:'~;'~: .'~::-~';~;~?
:..,.... ........r.:-..J. .
_..~'T~
:<~~~~ .:
',('" .
:--..~(,'
,~ '...
.~.::
. .,,~
. ~. "-'J -4.-1JP, J,
'/5i:
,~ "i.'~! ..~
:-..(':".
, .'...
','1.
.-~ "'..
't...
distributed
moved by Boyum,
yeas (Helml9s,
Amount
10,700.00
8,993.83
8,875.89
5,0811.98
.00
3,500.00
2,722.50
1,787.00
1,337.50
1.200.00
1,128.33
358.75
345.28
312.32
80.00
75.70
!5~.1~
52.81
19.92
44.00
10.30
TO
Dave Perkins contracting
DNR
JMM
Anoka County
VOID
Merv Prestebak
Ken Wiesen
M. Ulrich (May & June)
Independent Realty
Anoka Conservation District
Blaine Office Part.
Smith, Gendler. Shiell & Sheff
Rick Johnson
Bizmart
MASWCD
Tim Kelly
Kathy Tingel.tad
US West
Kinko's
US Water News
OfficeMax
7. LegiSlative Issues and MAWO Resolutions: Kelly presented this
item. He identifies three issues from last year and that have
been discussed over the last year: 1.) Relating revenues to the
runoff from property; 2.) Coordination and conformance of state
and regional facilities of Carlos Avery Wildlife Management Area.
......
",
..
"
~-1l.,'
. . -r~ ~'~:',~' ~~'0l:..
" ,", ....(~"
., ;, . ~ I. . ~ " ~.J:J.':
.; ~ ..;:j;
./~~. -
"'-\:,>;
>.,.'
'.
-.~J..
-.
~ ,~'j'~
.' .,~
"
"
'\'
.....
'.
.:; -}ir:
. ,~; ~:~J~
.:- .'.'~:~-
.,'
,,::
.~.
; l.'.
'-('-
'. '
Page 2. Coon Creek Watershed District - Auguat 10, 1992
~
"
.
Janes Field at the Anoka County Airport, and Bunker Hill. Park;
and 3.) Recovery or capturing coat. associated with the above
facilities. Kelly mentioned four other issues being discussed by
other watershed districts. Hemmes said that he didn't want our
District to get involved with these. Boyum agreed and said that
he is NOT in favor of increasing the per diem to $100/meeting.
Hotion was made to: 1.) Direct staff to prepare resolutions on
the three selected issues for possible adoption by the Board, and
2.) Direct staff to prepare a plan for distributing the Board'.
position to affected units of government and the legislative
delegation. Hoved by Williams, seconded by Boyum. Motion carried
with three yeas (Hemmes, Boyum and Williams) and no nays.
Permit Itema
8. Chester Wildlife Pond (PAN 92-55): Kelly presented the permit
review. The purpose of this project is construction of a 80 foot
by ao foot (1/10th acre) wildlife pond in Ham Lake. There was a
question concerning the District's liability if someone was to
fall into this six-foot pond; Ulrich stated that the District
would NOT be liable. Based on the findings in the permit review,
it was recommended to approve the permit without an escrow since
the pond would be wholly contained on the applicant's property.
Hotion to approve the permit was moved by Williams. seconded by
Boyum. Hotion carried with three yeas (Hemmes. Boyum and
Williams) and no nays.
9. Berg Driveway to Property (PAN 92-56): Hatthiesen presented
the permit review. The purpose of this project is construction
of a IS-foot by 300-foot driveway to a building site. There was a
discussion about if the applicant could avoid or minimize the
impact on the wetland by moving the driveway to the south. The
value of the mature trees in the area was also discussed. A
replacement mitigation plan was also discussed. Based on the
discussions. a motion was made by Hemmes to table the permit
until the various questions could be answered. Seconded by Boyum.
Motion carried with three yeas (Hemmes. Boyum and williams) and
no nays.
Informational Items
10. Receive Staff Report: Kelly presented this. Hotion to receive
the report was moved by williams and seconded by Hemmes. Hotion
carried with three yeas (Hemmes. Boyum and Williams) and no nays.
New Business
There was no new business.
Kelly updated the Managers on the situation with Park
Construction. He had told Park that the full Board wouldn't be
available until the August 24 meeting; so no decisions could be
made until that time.
Kelly stated that there is an effort at the local level to
preserve tree. and that wetlands sre becomIng a pivotal issue in
the natural resources arena.
The meeting adjourned at 8:22 p.m. on a motion by WIlliams.
seconded by Boyum. Motion carried with three yeas (Hemmes. Boyum
and Williams) and no nays.
'RegInald A. Hemmes. Preslcent
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
PERMIT REVIEW
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA NUMBER:
FILE NUMBER:
ITEM:
August 24, 1992
11
2-1-92-60
Eagle Trail Crooked Lake Ele.
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT: Tom Redmann, Supervisor of Sites and Grounds
Anoka Hennepin School ISD 11
11299 Hanson Bld.
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
LOCATION: Andover, Sec. 33, Crooked Lake Elem School and
Ditch 57
PURPOSE: After the fact permit for a nature/interpretive
trail for environmental education
APPLICABILITY:
Improvement of the bed, bank or shore of public drainageways
(1.10)
EXHIBITS: Permit application 8/7/92
Concept plan
Plant species list and report on trail by Eben
Davids 1991
1/2 section air photo showing project location
CONSIDERATIONS: Permit will be after the fact
FINDINGS:
Wetlands: Wetlands exist on the property. Fill has been
minimized and occurred before the WCA went into effect.
Floodplain: Project is within the floodplain, and is an
encouraged use of floodplains.
Soils: No erosion control needed
Stormwater & Hydraulics: No storm water issues
Groundwater: No ground water issues
Wildlife: Some enhancement of wildlife habitat with planting
Ditches: Adjacent to ditch 57 - is within the maintenance
easement
Utility line crossings: None
Erosion centrol escrow: Project is complete
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
":4i~!1f
...... ..
."
.'
, ,
. , ~"':. .
."..- ~ "~~'
.."....--.,..
.-'.
r,"' ..... ..;....
_~Io,.-....
.
..1-.-: "."
"
COON ClU:EK W ATERSlIED DISTlUC1'
PERMIT REVIEW
, ~~.
..: ..,;.~
"
,.... .-1.
- ';','. .?-.~. ;~)f i-~- :' ...
. .~!i~.~~~~:!:~~'~t..,>:
~- .
..-.,~
..:~:>:. ":~1
. .", ::~~.'.~J
.' < ~". 1-
. ". . . J..,.'
'. ,MEETING DA'l'i';: " ,.;:;~:,?: Auguat 24, 1992
AGENDA NUMBlm: '.7 Q 7
. FILENUMBEIt: '<-3-/4#.$ ",..
ITEM: PhesSllnt Mendowll Utlllty and Strcut Improvements.
of ^ndover Project 92.10.
.'j:' ....
'~~~;'<~;~;/r:...~i
... ~...- -".. , .
...> ,~, .~~ . ..
".l~'''''-: .
City
.. -'.
""': '
......;::.
. .
.... '"
LOCATION:
North of 133rd Avenue N.W. west or Jay Streot N.W. In
Andover.
.. :-.-,:. ~--/:.~;1 :i:.',: ,..... -.. '.'
,.,.' ,..., .:,,'" . PURPOSE:
..,,'." ,>;~'~"!..r; ..
J .~.
'.
~.';"..
.\
Utility llnd street Improvemonts.
APPUCANT:
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
. Andover, MN 55301
"
,_.
.,
,. ,
CONSIDERATIONS:
Control of erosion and siltntion from drainal;e (1.15).
Drllwinll:! and specifications by 'l'KOA dated July 21, 1992.
Permit Application dated August 3, 1992.
. Permit. ror the grading plan has not. been submit.ted.
,J
~;' .
APPLICABll.lTY:
.~. .......:.,
EXHIDITS:
.;,i ..~::.....
FINDINGS:
"\..' .
.;.... "
Wetlands
It appears thls crosses a portion or a wetland on the NWI
map, which is probably a Type 1 or 2.
. .~. ,'.: :::.,:;... .
,..::,:'..' '- '"" lo'tood In'
iC:'~~~~1~t,u ~..~ ":.;i; ...
I" .;,: '/ .~. ~~;::~?:> Stormwate\' and Hydraulics
:. ,'. -;~~.;))>.. ' .
This projoct does not. affect. creek or ditch floodplain.
Tho Anoka County Soilll Map shows the majority of this to
be SarteIl fine sand and a small portion of marsh.
'.
.' ~ ~. .
;<.,;. -.," .
..,-
A storm sewer enters a marllh at the west end of the
property. Pro sum ably, this marsh \s connectod to the
Hidden Creck East project and would drain throul;h a
seties of marshes and IItorm sewers, ultimntely reach
County Ditch 57.
..~;
. .
Groundwater
In the specifications, the contractor is roquired to obtllin a
dewatering pormlt.
I _~ _:". .,".. : .:'. . "
,....~~;. .."...... .4-..'-. ....W. lldllle ,.' 1 .:"',\1.'.""" <.,' ,"". .' '.X'-.....~j;::~::.,.." -......, ,.... ','.
~. -:!'\w. ~ .. ... -."-~'r.f'~ ,'.;.r~-~. .,1...... _ J': ~. ,,~ ~
,":{.;.~...:.l'.:~t,H'~ .':~4~~~ ~ '.-:'..>":' : .'l"'h"t..I:.,~~,-:..-t~It:~~,. ..,," ~.~)/'..~'I~~:~>:.~.~";.' '.: ," .'
~. :.,.'.:~<;:::~,\.' ~,~. ., ',' - ; "::. .'-. '"
, ".' .,'. .', Utfllt1LlDeCro.lln,. .' . "'. .-'..,
;. '~:..I1':'~'::.{:-)!~/" ~.....I ~ ~ ;.. .'-1i . ~.~. ...r .:.....~.::_.,.... ....... ;..
:~:l~.~.~;~ii~~ '~:;i~~~~~h&~.~$5'OO to"~~~1n~d i~m conLrllcto';': .
II; ~*" t ...;(a.M~ ":"~4 ,,~...;.. { ~x....:)2.~~<:'~l~. '" ~.... .__ ~ 'y:" f..'!r'l'i.~. 11 ,... ; .:
;. ,:,.~-q._' >< ."'r.~-,,)~, ......< .......;.,,,...,t~ ......".. . 'N'.,.""..~'I..i;"'';~'' ,'....'.."
.,. ~ ""'-r..,..... . "'IJ~);..-,.... ""....- .~J;..~..,::;....,. -.,' -.. .. t ''''-''i~' ' ~,
~'''-'''~''L''''''Ao~t..'''.'.: .;,..:.r.~~..........;tH)'~"'~" ~,.~.#. '-'l~~-"'-,!\,..._~..~.,,;..'~-' .. ~. . .....
.." .......-....:t',. ::"';'t". ."... ~.... ..-<" -~'1'" '. ....~ ~_~.) ?:J. ....... .. t" ,,,:,' . .
{::"f..;~1. r~~ ':-~ L. fit... .......... -(P' ''';-v'''",~;4" 14 ~l ~..... . .,..' ~ a-;:;(',,: :-:.... : "'. .' -
'u..r;..,~ -r, ~,~~f';..;~. ~ ",..~ ~~-tj? 4 ,.,{" :'" -f ~ :-.; ~;.~.. .";' , .. '. ~ ..~
:;,...\.,~. .. )"j"$;,t~~lI-,,('./.:~'~i)'~~ ~, ?f;~;;~','..~.....~'-.c';';'"'' ::'. '-.
'"'<(..~' ~'..-~;;;;...I.~iI:.J'~.-jI~..<:' . ':.. ~~l.q", ;-',,'r;..;';~'.,." :.,
.. "I"",~1;. t'l7 " ~".'t,'r..:..r. " y.:','-~'~: .:.~~~;t<,;-;.-; -- ,.'. :-',
_~~~f/~'"!:s~l,4'<'f . ~,.~?f':i~-4<"'. . .~~~,~~'\~~~:~~.: ..., ,.' (~
...~.~.~ ;:J~'"1;,.)'~" ."C!:...;'...,...,.~.j'~....,..,.
- -.i;..&; ..'\lk... ...~~. 't ......".~~ . .t.a..,-f4~..~;.-~~~~".1.. ~...~! .. ':,,,,. 'f. ...
~- ,,_ .....-y,~ ... _r?f... . -s..r. 't....-f- .. .~"'_-...~ ..,,(J'-" ...."... .... ~ .
~i:.:~~,k_O~~9.9;.2~.:.&l. 9nl!.,:-~1~..:y~:.~.:'~, ~~_~.~-~l~.-~~~: a I
... -;
, . .,' '..... . y,:. iI.
": }:.;:;;z.......' f ':! '\,.' ;-....'-:-.~!
~ '.,' ',' _,." .....,a .~~.:;,
. ~ ,-r-'
'.~'" , ';,!.~ '1: ':' . ~.., .;~':1.~4
.....,:...\.f..-.., "'~'-'-1k c..,.',..~
." ~~~~ i...~ .~~~i.':.;~,::.:fi
- ;:;~;f::~~ffi~j~
'. ._~J.o.... .-:-.-' "It:-
:~. ". ~~' ::/~T' ':~~{~i..t~\.~
, .'ilos;uuiw-'Hw(":i'~
. '.'. ....,,<........ ~'.'. _ _--io
::..-"'.
"_ .._'~'.;:'~,<i :,"
',':':}:-:H~~~~I~~~0':r~:-', .'
,: .;.";.... .':_.X:" ~'...
.\' . ....~...':"':
~ .-. - ., .'
. ~.: -;, .'
~ -~~ ':::_'~'~:~~
~.",
";
.:' :'-';~!~8J{r;:;~r~f~~:;:' '~:,
...". ~':,.
".. '
-4i.,......;~~::~
.........-...
. .*'-
.~.
:~...,:~.
-~ - .
...,... '. .._~ l."-':' -: :..' -.. ".
........
-'
,~:.~.._:_.oL~/: )',
"
......
;.:""..~
" ',.'
...., ~'),COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
"', ;c'},: ", ::'. PEltMIT REVIEW .
" ~,,~i::~:;ff::%:-';: :. l i:t'\:)!Ii;J,~:cf:;~;~~}~f; :~' (Continue,~
"'~':;~'C1~~v:r"-J'::,>"-<':';",~,~'r~~{#9~0i:::~>~ ,,:1:, "', ~ . . >~!t:'j
, '. ,:,:' </.-: MEETING DATE. ,f, ~" " . .'::, . August 24, 1992
..::~'" ~~'AGENDANUMBI<;R: ;,.'C' -'t.'.'.,<:._', ",
. . '~~':.; ",:: :.FILE NUMBE~ "r;~~!~~~~t;~:,... ..
. ITEM: .,-~.:,~'7t-;;~:;>,. _ Pheasant Meadows Utility and Street Improvoments.
~,',w,' .:...,." '. f A-d p./ t 92 10
.' -st...:~"".''':'''' 0 nil OVOl' rOJec '.
FioldInspection. "/':); ;.. Tim Kol1y, on an August 20, 1992 site inspQction.
. ,: :'. ':,f; . ;.';: ":dctormlned that the wetland outlet hilS been constructed
. ..-.'~'::~<'.:..~.</)(:-.an~ gTlldln!: oHMa project docs not llC1'ed any wetland.
.-.... "L;,~;.~~.~....l:~:t'.~"'(~'.~~r-{;:-:- ''It . - - .....~
. :". .... Approval with the eUpulatlon that tho contractor obtain 11
District Permit.
'.T."
,.
",.".\:-r~:
. '/i~ :7~;:~'.~-~'-:~~~;1
...i ,.:.,. ,.
(
'.;:~, ...
" .'.\. 'L'h~-~
1: "T"'t.:~'. ,1,,'..1
"::'''=~~~)~~~.1"~
{"!""'" ......~,~
: -'.~;. ;);\i.;~;SA~1t~
..:..t "'.,.~ .!-t.>..... .~~,
. c' . ~ ,; ';;:" ~.},
City'"'' '. ..' :7:
'. ~',~
'r:;:'."
~,~ " ~ !~..;..~-
.4
'. .-
-,
..-. .~~:: .i'~ ~_:
,.._A',
UJ.:COMMENDATION:
'.
...!' ....:
."
'..
...~. . '!.',
'. ";
..~..
...
-~
~
...!
'. :..
.'
"\'
..'. '.~
';'.;.;-.~
.
~
r
~
.
.-
'.. .
":r,
. .,..... :"'f:
. -
:.1,.
..:' ~
. .'
~.~,;'..... .'
"-t-""
~..~~>:>;;1~:~ .'
1 ''''.'
~'. :'~... ~.-
: ."
.. ;. '~:~:l~~'-;'" .....~~..
;. s":l/;;,>~\
..., ... %
.-. ~'-.;:~
,~ ....
, '.
,..:,,'~
'.; .,
- ........
"".:!;'i
';,!/f1
. :>:i".
:~';..ir
~~~
~;~!J
. '~i
.;~
"-1
",..;(
'. ->. J'- .
........-.....
'.. ir'; '. :~., ..;
.-"';' .
". -.-.-.
....~ ..'
. :: ~ ~.~~.: :-r' <~ <::'.
.'.
.'
'..
. '-. ,-I
/~. .
!,..r.
;.;.....:.-.....
~ _'. ~ ,i
.L'~ '::.
. ..';'
l '.,
:.......- '
'. '
',.-.
..... ) ~ ~.- :<.t,'. ~.'~.:_""",'
...': :,: '.':~: . :
':" -~, ~: ...~. -'. ~
..'" :~-;...,
I r -.,\"
.. ~'?~;~~f2;~~-"~ .'
",.
. '~;~-1":~'~~!i'~;'}?~1
'. ';. ....:<:.~~~t
~.-:';.... -., .,
. ..~("
":".,
',;f.~,:.,.
",;.:',:~;.:" "~: COON CHEEK WATERSHED DISTnICT
,;;;;,,< :', .' {':ii;; ""Rom REVIEW _ ..
j;';:-'.~b':-:' f MEETING DATE: ":''-''',i!'.~\> AUl;Ust 24, 1992 ,-
,.;.:?.';;:....~:."AOENDANUMBEn... '. h, 8
.. ;'. '-. f.:':-' l , . ..... "', . ~
_.,' -.';:.!~.;0~'~..;.~.:.:f~ Vll..E NUMDEJl1 ,.~~~:;~;~i~ ~'.".' .~. ..t-~ -9.-:e - s ~ ::r'o,~; .;': .~.:. ....:.
. _J~~r~:j,~8~).rEMI . .': ~:;{~:~::~, . Hidden Creek 5th Additio~ Utility
,<~~<.". ,-' , '. ., Improvoments. Andover City Project 92.15.
. \ " ..". _'.:.~
'.. .~.'l.'
.
I.
.' ..~;; ....::,.
, ,
.~.',.. :;::" .
..
,". \~- , . ..,':,' ".
: ;'fj'_\~~
~..:::'.;
";' .
. '," ~.
and Street
,.:',t'.
. .;. ~-' . ~ .;. :.
LOCATION:
"
North of 133rd Avenue N.W., west of Ni"htinl:ale Street
N.W. in Andover.
<.
,'.' . ::.;:;.," ~~ ,t..
.:_-:\;~!. ~. .<
~ PURPOSE:
'* . .'::~"'. ...,.,,;.:.~_:". ,- -.'F'
.' Utility and lltrcet Improvements to Hidden Cruek 'Oth~'"
Addition.
:.'~
",
-r'-'
."
APPLICANT:
City of Andovor
1685 Crosstown Doulovllrd N.W.
Andover,~~ 55304
: ~~,
. ."",
'. APPLICADn.ITY:
Control of erosion and siltation from drainage (1.15).
'. ...: ::~. ".. r ';"
~:XHIBrrs:
Drawings and specifications by TKDA dated July 21, 1992.
Ponnlt Application dated August 3, 1992.
. (,otter from Thomas A. SyfKo of 'rKOA noting that
contractor Is required to obtain a dewatering permit, dated
AUgllst3, 1992.
.....f
;" ::~...:..\ :': :....~
. ~;:.i: .'~~:~/~~. .
.- ; ....::.:--,~- ,j.
, ',.j
...-.... .
~" ..
.'; ......,; ....
:...;..:....'. :.:~' .....
. '." ....-.. , .
CONSIDERATIONS:
. '.:;-::: '.~;:' P.' .- FINDINGS:
. ,". ::: ::!;'~~"i.~'~'~>:~';7
,,'.~'.. ..\".:"':;-.~j,:",,: Wetlands
! .... . :.~ .. . :'.;'..~~~t=~~~..
. ~.,~~...~~.~.t1.~~.>~_ .
. .. '" ....._. F
': -'--'. . ':;,~:I<1oodplD.tn
.;.;.
." ~ ,,'
~ These are protected with ,ilt fence shown at the outlets of
cutvcrh. There are none affected accord in" to the grading
plan. "'..
t .
.... .
.J', _
,.- ;-:' r
..'."
,:.";'.<?'~'(.
~ .-;. . ~
. ~ .~: . .
On the wndin~ plan, the building pads Q~e' placed high '
enough to avoid any problem. Thoro i. no fi1llng In
floodplain pllln.
-'-~
, SolI.
The utilitios cross Sartell fine sand ant! Lino 10nmy fine
.and.
....
.~.( ';'.-
... .... h _
c',
.-~;:~.;.:~-~..,., :.
. ". .'
. Stonnwutcr and IIydraul~
.,
; . ~'. . .
I
... ...-.
..,t.
"'I'. ...:,....' )f"4 . . ,.'_.
~.f,)t::~fi ;;'t;:;jo~ .0...:....- .'wa......
i.+.~ :....1.)' ."~: ". X""-UU.l ~-
. to<~~~l~')~/: _~.-
. ; j...
~'. ':, ., .
~5~~~~~~:..~' WlIdllto . "~,;.
;,,'J.,~;~~..:xt.. ..Dltcne. ',' ...,.;.~,..... ',-'-'",'
~'.::;.:;"f~,.x:~.f~{' . ;"A.: .,ht......'?f~.
;~ ~~?\T'\>;,.~: Utili'" .. ,__ ~~',"'~ '1,:';":'"
~,:,"~:~,;",.I.. ;';.\t....,.,.~.. -J UUKJ '"'...~a&np .r;,!~.
t~~;~~~:f~?~._l.~:~l~~.~ . . ...s~~~~~~;~,:, ,',
}r"~....:1~..... .t.;;J-"~. . ,J......,j(_...l.o."- ~.
~~,~1~>~~~'~~:~~:;~>:." _::.:~\~i\E~'i_'
" '':.l~\''''t.", ,'.ft.... ., :..."......
:,l:.tl ,fO,",,>_~":"~4'~1".~';"" "; ~-,. 0, ~~:ito"'tt.~-~.
:"';:'J-._...o::~...;t:."1'_:~:,"r ,",.;~' .-;:.---.t::-... ":'
,', '.....'" ...".~.t. - " . . .> ._~
.; '-:.:.~'t~,--!'I,,~......,.~.. ,- t__- -.
! .:~~.~~?2_00. ON 9S: 6 '. ~~!-.Q~~~nll
.
.'
Of., - '''~,'f'
.....:~;.i_.l-= . ~
~ 0-,
,,-~: ::,.':~' .~ - .~':j:~t~~~\::~?#l
. ':-:..,-~ ~:i: 'ttt\}.
.-.. ~<."
"
-. ....
- .~.
.....
;"..,:,.'
. ~~'. ......... .
. . .---:'-"';'~...-:'~.~ .
#~':"~ .... '. . \'
~:. ::t~!:tjti {
'~.-'~:;~i:~,
"
. ...:t: '
...10...
.... 'f
., COON CltEt:K WATEHSHt:!) DtS'nUC'f
IJKRMlT REVIEW
"-:~. (C tin d) .. ~ ...,< ..-~:-.: . ..C._"
> ,~~:~:~:~~~ ~ ":; '::~~"'J'ZfJj~f~.i~;i;~
.,; ~ Hlddon Creak 15th Addition Utl1lty and Street .,,;,.,::.....
. ~ri~:~~~~~'ln:~roov~rt~;t:O~r~~~;r~2.HS. .-..,..,. 'f;.k:~K~'::;:' ',"~;
-.. ~ ~
:
. ~~:..~ ...:!..}}
. '. :# 'i. : ~-_ '
'. ;.~
.:..~
.".'
'. -~ -'f
.-
MEETING DAn::
. AGENDA NUMBHR:
FILE NUMBER:
l'fEM:
"
Erosion Control Escrow
Field Inspection
. ':{~ ~
.'.
An inspection by Tim Kelly on Augu9t 20, 1992 3howod tho
.' utilities aro in placo at the wetlnnd outlut.
SUMMARY:
Projoct ill consistont with tho stipulation thllt the contractor
ohtolin a District pennit with tho approved b'l'uding plnn.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval with tho lltipulntion thnt tho contractor obtain n
District pormit.
~i
i:
~'\':,~
:'.
~:
.;
..~ .
...J
'.
'". X~;~
~ ~-:
'.
';' ~ .!'~;
.-
. . -, J
~. ,.,1
.) ".-fi
.;,"',1
, ~'i
.....
<.~,~
:-.~:.t--: j~'
. .~l- !
). i ...~..~
: ..~~~\':~- .;.,' :"~'.:. ,,:= ;:.~. ..'.... ,:"';"",.' ," ".v .
't.~',;f.:}~..\i\~~~,~~.....-_.:,...f :.:.~~..~. ~~ ~ .~?:('~'n~_!t<~. "".'1>.:1'4" :~-
....,,' "~';."':->;:-':~-'I'_C:-. _.r;.:"".::"'~~'"f.'::)j ',' .f..'~ _ ~~r~.:.;.:... .
'.
"7
.!"'..
.' ..,.
~.'. . !.. "'_""":-\;~:'~-"~.1.:j .....~~- ~:~~.....~,(~ ~r:~~<~'r'~~~:'..-~:- ~'-'t;).j
'-,..~-.:- ,..... '.~;... ~~~...._.) \. ......;...-...f _'.s...."l"',.~<....~:~~i,;.,'."':\l
::. ,:,_,,1,... ~ ."._..,f ,_.'.. .'\: .._ ~.';~'.... .....~ ':.'--:'.;~..;.~:
..;; 'i' ~ . I .~
';. .. . :.'. '. "::~~1
..,., ......,..
.' ...,'~{o;i);;~:~' ,: ..~:{~~;:!>;\~~\~~!
.' .' ,,;'.;.~!-r.~' '~'~;0'io..';"~t.l."~""~';':'.\.~i'L~''''~~
. "<.: .'~' .,:t<lj.tr'.."".~ '.,~-, 'Q'" . .:.i;""-.'~ :.e' :.!,f
'~f ...............""" .~.-./~ .".\,v:~rat-'l . - ~ -!=l;~....
~ ',. .'. ". .~~;;;...,....'~:/-=;~,j!'. ,,'T.l! J....;l; t,~~~;:;..-;:...!j:. . J
. "-.. ....... .' "','- .:;......~ l.-:~~:J r:!~- C?.1...~.'t'.">'t.i:,..'t~~;"'~~
','d., ..... '.'" ,":t;..:,~~..!~ .'1'~>Y~1<:.".;f"7't"",
~::.' .J"-~:";'~.'J,,~' (.~:1~~/~":o:~~~"-&-.;...}.i~
. .. '" ;" _' ~....... . !I'~'" ~ ';..::-..'r.;y"i t-\,<r_ot
. ..~. '''';';'' ~ . ..1.... "'-"'\"'-1i:'.A:~ (
" '" .'"J~'t"''''''' .-.v,.clo'~"'r"'.\r':.jo~'\ .
,',- ;. . ':':,,:. ": ~_t "':~"~"i..:;t;"L;h:':}~' ';~:'~I~'~' .
, ~ ..~. ..~ 4"-R.- "",," l_ '?L" ~U:' ~ ~J.~ .~
..'-.~,. . "~'i~",~.,'<".i{;hi~'l.~~_t1;~....~;.; ;it' .'
.. ~.- ~~,...,-'-< . ".......,-"..,;,-: At~",,'~4~'J,:...f,tO ...~
VllV-~l ~-,i t 9: a~I"~?~~.!!11~~;J~~H::iw~
.
.'.~..:.. ~. ~_' ..-.--. ~. ~<.(~_~..~~'..~-~-.~--"'-~itt..~{~.
. 4. "". . ..... ' .. ~.,. ....-; '.. t.._ ~ ('-
-. .,' '1.. ..' "'. . . . . '1-..,. ~': .~';':~" '
, ..' ' . ' ,.'''-'-" ,.'...~1'\.... . c./" ~~ ..::to.... -,
1:'JA.tA~',,~l)~~~ ~~..~ "J1;~&1-~~~""'''''''''''!.J' ~. .~.r..:"~4':";"_
J,,; .J.~'''''"1':. .~. AL~~ ~ -'"' . ..... '"..
;;~':-:~~:l.;., ~..."::~"::""'ri'...kt",-tr r~;,~ i' ll' !sl~}.~~, '-:.'.
. ~r.' .:"'...~'\'SJ._. - '~. "..' ~.i-'tj->7<'fi.>s~,,,,,,,-,"J<~I!t.rn l!;:;:." ~',
~..., ,;......... '"';-'. ,.--.~ .."..~ a~ .. ~.~r;,., ",'" ..............,. " '. ......
..-"t ....t...t' Jt... ,," ~'~'r;;'ff:J' ..jII,-, .~".tl- . ,:;:...". ~ e<.
.... '. ~ ,. ~_. t J "'" . ,r -.I., ... .. ~ .c-'" "" 1 . t - ..
:_.....- \-"-:;"G~r~ ~ '..",' _ ,,~.~, ~. .. "" .~:;~. : -l~~ ......;.. '_. 1'~ -
"J"~.:"..,,,:.,~-~"':.t .... ""'_f. : ,~.,1o.",..,1'lt......~,.- .,........~t~. ~~~":..,......~ ~.
"'''l-r ~':::!'';'"';:''' .t~:I- .. . ..:J."~" .. .. ~ .' ..-.
~.),fI'!__t+..~~. .~, o/:-......f..;-.....~"''',.... {\./'...r....~ .ii-"'fir...~:'..
,"",; ."f.y-..~.,_. > (",' - ..i"~..!'~..,~ "''t;.-f....~ '~,.:, ','
--1"""'"$'" ~ f:,\ "'~...~:t~(.~...; t........... :0'.. .::ll"ll:-~ ~-t. >~.... :;""~"-10 ":"\.~ ~.. ."_ .
,r~"lf~.. -c.~..~t..;..~~~.~tfi->~f:~.~~..~:~.~-;,~Sfh*f';. ;. ;~ '.:
~ "t-., ~~~:>.: ... r C.. #4.:' J~.""':' ~-;:. f~'" '-n1io~."'~ . 100
~Ft.... "-l: ~ -,~,'~'';;~. ~'-:':."; ;'.~':':"'''~"'''\.~~t.;..""..,...... I
"'~;6.;If"O.d S' ~ ...." " . ~.
:1).ri;1:.~..::'_i;.._q,O*O~N J~,~6..::;:t,~~J~~..i9[l~ : ::."','
R ~~ ~lll~ ED ft.Nmv~
CITY OF ANDO~;R ~:I.a.r---"1Ii
August 27, 1992
Department of Army - Army Reserve
Commander of 367th Engineering Battalion
Attention: Mr. Jackson
Building 506, Fort Snelling
Saint Paul, MN 55111
727-5177
Dear Mr. Jackson,
The Andover Athletic Association, incorporated in the city of
Andover as a non-profit organization, sponsors youth sports for
approximately 4,000 boys and girls in the Andover area. Programs
sponsored this past year included: basketball, softball, baseball,
T-ball, and track.
The Andover Athletic Association is seeking assistance from the
Army Reserve to help in a major undertaking within the City of
Andover, which will not only benefit the general public but area
youth in particular. This project includes the construction of a
multiple playing field complex. It is anticipated that the Army
Reserve's role would include the leveling and grading of
approximately 25 to 30 acres near the Andover City Hall.
What makes this of great importance is the need to increase the
number of playing fields on an urgent basis to accommodate not
only the current requirements but immediate future needs as well.
This predicament has been brought on by the following:
o Community growth has greatly exceeded park facility
improvements
o Hyper expansion in all youth programs has exceeded
available field capacities causing use restrictions and
schedule problems.
o Major funding is not available to keep pace with demand
for field needs.
It is anticipated that the following people or groups (at a
minimum) would use and benefit from this complex:
o General public (city, county, state)
o Community School programs
o Andover Athletic Association's Youth Participants
o North Metro Association's Youth Participants
o Softball/Baseball Local and State Youth Tournaments
o Practice fields for all concerned
o Adult programs not connected with Athletic Association
o Joint-play activities with Ramsey, Anoka, Coon Rapids,
Ham Lake, and Soderville Youth Participants (minimum)
o other civic and communitv orqanizations
Page 1 of 2
Specifically, the Army Reserve is requested to complete the
following critical steps:
o Survey the project (near the Andover City Hall)
o Clear and level land (approx 25 to 30 acres)
o Install stubs for sewer and water from main lines to
designated locations on property
o Haul top soil to site and spread soil for seeding
purposes
o Construct building on property for storage, rest rooms,
and other public use functions
It is estimated that the grading project would begin in the summer
of 1993, with final preparations/seeding in September 1993, and be
ready to begin actual field improvements in April of 1994.
As a leader of youth programs in the Andover area, the Andover
Athletic Association continues to search for ways to improve and
operate quality youth programs for the reduction in juvenile
delinquency, general welfare of the community, and positive
recreational activities. This Association looks forward to working
with the Army Reserve to review with you this project feasibility,
define further all the requirements, and to establish a optimistic
completion schedule.
The Andover Athletic Association is looking forward to your
initial response within the next three weeks (Sept. 19, 1992).
Should you have any questions, feel free to contact us by writing
to the Andover Athletic Association, 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW,
Andover, MN 55304 or by phoning one of the numbers listed below
during evening hours.
Sincerely,
!lJ t;j) () ~
LW/J7.~
Linda Kerchner
ANDOVER ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
President
422-9644
Dave O'Toole
Project Organizer
427-5976
cc: Andover Park Board
Andover City Council
"
.....
I
I
I
'i
, f . .
,.-
:..! ," p
..
.1
..
, ';'
, . '
,~" :" ..t .
.: .: ,'t'.,!'
t . I ~ .
, . ',<."
,I
. .
P I I
I
"
."
~\ '
'I"~ I
U.' j
kK \
}'--.-
-~
~'" .
" "
o. . I' ".
.. ... .fl ..
t. . ,: ,:'
",'" '; It
. .
.,
~ \I
r ",
:. ,
..
, .
,f
:c
f-
e:
o
c-=.--J
, I
II" _1.
.,
f :1
. " ,
~\ ~ -:<;.
'I ' "'~"
,
,
,
"
~ ,
..
(FA'
\\1'\
.~'~,~" .,
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
September 1, 1992
DATE
ITEM
NO.
Approve Change Order
Andover Senior Center
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
i1
Planning l<!-
David L. Carlberg
BY: Ci ty Planner
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Staff, Committee, Comm
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to approve the change order
for the Andover Senior Center for a make-up air system and a four
(4) compartment sink.
MAKE-UP AIR SYSTEM
The Uniform Mechanical Code and the Anoka County Health Department
requires a make-up air system be installed. The make-up air
system will include a hood for the stove, duct work, etc. The
cost of the makeup air system installed, less roof work, less
electrical and plumbing is estimated at $14,825. Attached for
Council review is a memo from Jim Martin, SYSCO, Minnesota
indicating the cost of the system. The City will be advertising
for bids for the system as requested at the meeting tonight.
SYSCO, Minnesota will be crediting the City $4,390 for equipment
previously ordered for the make-up air system.
FOUR COMPARTMENT SINK
The Anoka County Health Department has reviewed the plans and has
indicated that a four compartment sink is needed. One sink is
equipped with a disposal system, one sink is for washing pots and
pans, one sink is for rinsing and the final sink is for food
preparation. The cost of the custom built four compartment table
and sinks is $4,020. The City will be credited $2440 for item
previously ordered.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
Page Two
Change Order - Senior Center
City Council Meeting
September 1, 1992
COST BREAKDOWN
Original contract with SYSCO
change in equipment sinks ($4,020 - $2,440)
Change in equipment make-up air
Total
$18,087.50
$ 1,580.00
$-4,390.00
$15,277.50
$14,825.00
Make-up air system the City will be bidding
The City has spent to date in addition to the SYSCO contract:
Equipment removal and preparation
Flooring
$ 900.00
$1,835.78
The kitchen will also have a new ceiling, the cost is as follows:
Ceiling $436.30
Total cost of the renovation at this time is estimated at
$33,274.58. Note this figure does not include electrical work and
plumbing.
SYSCO. Minnesota
~
I
! "
AUGUST 28. 1992
MR.DAVE CARLB~RG
CITY OF ANDOVER
ANDOVER. MN
\'
RE: EQUIPMENT QUOTATION
DEAR MR. CARLBERG:
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CUSTOM STAINLESS STEEL TABLE AND SINKS PER
APPROVED PLAN SUBMITTED TO ANOKA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AS
FOLLOWS:
1 EACH
"L" SHAPED FOUR COMPARTMENT SINK 11'6" X 4'0", (4)
TUBS. LEVER DRAINS. FAUCETS. DISPOSAL RING WELDED
IN, S/STEEL LEGS/CROSSRAILS, 4' S/STEEL WELDED
UNDERSHELF.
DELIVERED SET IN PLACE lESS FINAL PLUMBING AND
'ELECTRICAL.
THIS UNIT TO BE MANUFACTURED BY PREFERRED SHEEr
METAL.
TOTAL:
$ 4020.00
CREDIT FOR DEDUCTION OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS PR~VIOUSLY
ORDERED:
1. CUSTOM S/STEEL DISHTAELE 1070.00
2. CUSTOM "L" SHAPED FOOD PREP TABLE 1370.00
TOTAL CREDIT: $2440.00
c~.
,A!~TIN
?-$YSCO MINNESOTA
CITYA_JM:RCR
(612) 785-9000 · 2400 COUNTY ROAD J . ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55112-4507
c0'd
~c68SS~6
01
NW-'HJ~nd OJSAS WO~~ 01:vl c66!-R7-~nH
SYSco. Minnesota
~
AUGUST 28, 1992
MR. DAVE CARLBERG
CITY OF ANDOVER
ANDOVER. MN
~):;j)';1'~....~a,.3.
,.;..:.;;.,:-- \
RE: EQUIPMENT QUOTATION
DEAR MR. CARLBERG:
SPECIFICATIONS FOR EXHAUST CANOPY AND MAKE-UP AIR SYSTEM PER
APPROVED DRAWING SUBMITTED TO ANOKA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
AS FOLLOWS:
.1 EACH
STAINLESS STEEL FRONT DISCHARGE CANOPY ,18 GALLON AS
MANUFACTURED BV PREFERRED SHEET METAL.
6'X4' WITH (1) NFPA LIGHT FIXTURE. (3) STAINLESS
STEEL FILTERS, ANSUL FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM, STAIN-
LESS STEEL INSULATED WALL PANELS o'X6' (1) LOT 16
GA. WELDED DUCT WORK. INSULATED THIMBLEV FLAT METAL
ROOF CURB, 2400 CFM @ 3/4" SP, RUP? 2400 CFM MAKE-
UP AIR SYSTEM WITH CURB AND DUCT WORK.
ABOVE EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED, LESS ROOF WORK,
ALL ELECTRlCAL AND PLUMBING.
TOTAL:
14,825.00
CREDIT FOR DEDUCTION OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS PREVIOUSLY ORDER-
ED;
1. CUSTOM HOOD o'X 3'6"
1250.00
2. ANSUL FIRE SYSTEM
1075.00
3. EXHAUST FAN
690.00
4. EXHAUST SYSTEM INSTALLATION
1375.00
TOTAL CREDIT:
4,390.00
nS.
~TIN
SYSCO MINNESOTA
CITYA1JM: RCR
(612) 785-9000 · 2400 COUNTY ROAD J . ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55112-4507
m'd
[c68SS,!.6
01
NW-'HJ~nd OJSAS WO~~ 0t:pt c66t-8c-8n~
.
\ CO?1
CO\)~c~~
~ fJCltL ~ OO~no-'
J/~s AD f}UA.C!A tfD
'-1uL~ U-Q.- iucrh (jlUtJ
tJ.sti tuJr. lJJ.L ()JVLL
aJ)..tL to Jl..a..1A.L EfU&t
Ol.J-&; .:t~(JO.'
P LttUl). Ku-p U1- (/)L;
nt.,u1cL ~u-IlUL ~OV- /LutC....
lu.ip ~
~ ~CLA.dAJ,
~ o..iJJ 1ft t/i-Luu-6G
f!tUJ~ '1-L(-.L IJ-A J J.fiys rp ,
t1UkLu..cuLj
~,
V"-'
\'-J' .
THOMAS G. VALENTY
3400 152ND LANE NW · ANDOVER, MN 55304
cu,p\1"'
c\.,
· (612) 421,6975
COUNCIL COpy
July 22, 1992
Andover Fire Dept.
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
Attention: Mr. Bill Mashuga, Fire Chief
Dear Mr. Mashuga:
On Friday afternoon, July 17, a severe thunderstorm hit our area.
Following a lighting strike nearby, our home security system
indicated a fire in our home and the Andover Fire Dept. responded.
No one was at home, as I was with our daughter-in-law who was at
Abbott-Northwestern Hospital having heart surgery and my wife was
at her home tending her six children. My son's home is listed as
the place to call in case of a fire or burglary alarm. A call did
come to my wife there, but she had no car and couldn't leave the
children. She called our next door neighbor to meet with the
firemen and to see what the problem might be.
Three trucks and a sheriff's car responded to the alarm. There was
no external evidence of a fire, but of course the firemen wanted to
get inside the house to be certain there was no internal fire. They
had no way of entering and were contemplating what to do next when
I returned from the hospital. They checked over the interior of the
building, including the attic and found no sign of fire. They also
checked a large metal storage building at the rear of our lot and
found no evidence of fire.
The conclusion was that the nearby lightning strike had probably
set off the alarm. Subsequent investigation by Honeywell security
Systems confirmed this conclusion as the circuit board in the
security system had to be replaced. Honeywell is making
modifications to the system in an effort to minimize the
possibility of future false alarms.
I wish to complement the Andover firemen for theirquick':respons'e"t
to the alar.!L1_e.!1d, the if ~tho'roughri.ess.1 in seeking a posslbte cause.
They were professionalJ in their'approach, and considerate in their
actions. Even-thotlgh- there was no fire,and.theY~l1a(l:tci':)eave their
regular work to respond, they were~ee~~~~"_~~_P?~~!=~l
In recognition of its outstanding service, my wife and I wish to
donate $50.00 to the fire department to use for recreational
purposes, or in any other way they wish.
Thanks again for responding to the alarm.
~'- ~.J~
,
I
MINUTES OF THE ANDOVER STAFF RESORCE COMMITEE MEETING ON
AUGUST 10TH ,1992
PRESENT R. VIERKANT, J. NOYES, T. MILLER, STEVE BERHOW,
D. TERRY, M. SCHILLING
ABSENT:
J. NOYES, R. SOWADA,
c
O~
~
C
0;0;.
SECRETARY : D. SZYPLINSKI
CALLED TO ORDER: BY T. MILLER AT 7:05 PM
ITEM 1.) LEAVE OF ABSENTS
MOTION BY S. BERHOW THAT JIM PIERSON BE
GRANTED A 30 DA Y LEAVE OF ABSENTS.
SECONDED BY D.1ERRY. MOTION PASSED
ITEM 2.) PROCEDURE OF LEAVE OF ABSENT.
ST AR1ED ON IDEA'S FOR A FORM AND TYPES OF LEAVES
DAVE WILL COME BACK WlTI[ A FORM IDEA
ITEM 3.) TOM SUGGESTED THAT THE GROUP WORK ON IDEAS
TO DIVIDE UP THE TASK AMONG THE COMMITTEE.
ITEM 4.) WE HAVE FIVE APPLICANTS
STARTED ON IDEAS ON WHEN, HOW MANY PEOPLE WE WILL
BE purrING ON.
SUGGES1ED TIlA T WE GO TO A TWO TIME A YEAR SCHEDULE
TO FILL OPEN SPOTS. THE GROUP WILL CONTINUE WlTH THIS,
POSSIBLE TIME FOR TIllS FALL WILL BE ADDS IN THE PAPER ON
OCfBOBER 7TIl AND 14TH WITH TESTING ON THE 24TH OF OCfOBER,
ITEM 5.) THE GROUP HAS A CONCERN WITH THE NEW POLICY OF POINTS FOR
CANCLED CALLS AND TOM WILL BRlNG UP THE CONCERNS AT THE
NEXT OFFICER MEETING.
ITEM 6.) FIRE FIGHTERS THAT HAVE LEFT THE DEPARTMENT.
MOTION BY R. VIERKANT THAT ALL MONIES DUE TO FIRE
FIGIITERS TIlA T HAVE LEFf THE DEPARTMENT BE ISSUED TO THEM
AT TIllS TIME. SECONDE BUY M. SCHILLING
MOTION PASSED
ITEM 7.) OLD BUSINESS
NONE.
ITEM 8.) NEW BUSINESS
JUANITA PALO FROM EMS WOULD LIKE TO JOIN THE FIRE
DEPARTMENT AND IS MAKING APPLICATION TO US.
ITEM 9.) MEETING CALLED TO A CLOSE AT 8:45 PM
MOTION BY RANDY
SECONDED BY DENNIS
PASSED
RESPECfFULL Y SUBMITIED BY D. L. SZYPLINSKI.
jlJ7:J..
rIng TONE CALL SHBET
Andove~ rite Depart~ant
. -_..- _____..u --- . .____u ._.~ ____._.._ .._____ .__ _ _ ___.__. . , I ___ --"----- 4
':>'3..l-t. 1 (1/ ~ S M "e.11 71 - I, ,.,1 /5 Yi.
1:l161 ' J OO:/J-
1)/]0 S~30 Il.3 ~ t:.'l-f'lo) ,0\0'\ ij',r- PI: 5) tI /I{ I
.':U/71 11./ 003 'I I..\. /L 0 h... We...) ~ dol.)"'- 7( ~ II; l.{ 0 D Y -t
'i J./7 1- ..2 t, ld .s <..0-. tr.tf ll.. Ot" G-- r"-S1 ~j (~ 7( (, /b :/5 0 II I
,
, -- -
'j J Ii~' 41, 5 -,' /5'1 ~ il\I'" ,Co 0... dl ~".".. 7/ ~ 16: S f ~O ..2 0 J
'"
',- ,. .,. . 'i,
'12/7 V ). S 37 I 3.r a....... O-(zlf tt.{ ,....3...lj.. (L~..el-,.o", 13: j 5 1> 12- I
'1 ). In' <rVYO PI s- ~ 'Ala.............. 7/7 /q:l, fI[ .:2.5 j....-2-
9'). Of:, )Ol(/ IS-e, ~ , m f..t!it.c...1 1/ r 18 ).-'-
I v:~r D
V-crd h... - UI ' ~/I, ... I ~ ~
f.l/77 ~ " "1 r ;1.3: 3lf N
" G-(;.~ 'SM~/I 1/1 I~ I
b/7! J 3 ".1 </ Crook c J ll< 13! iJd 00:5 I N
'/.l/7~ .1 :U. I /I.fS ~, M:e.dlC~{ 7{ G Ib:31 D 11.0 I "
cJ.l. fJ'D )..}J, IV S ~ IYJ ~ d i c"- I /;q /7: oq D if J
ri .1. 1/'1 I Sf I 0 Foy 5t Vl.-l-e d i La.. I 7110 15:</g 0 t ,. )
.'-'
q~/rl. ;1.151 I '-to ~ U"cc. P"-h../ I';:" ii lJ'; 1 q II g J
~).J!J3 G.......lt.n. - R Q T f'G.tks V).,c. PI.. 7/ 1 .;L /):,s" 0 J-lf I
1 ). I ry 1'I000",so>'\. -Crc1s-+o<v",- GJ, .I "}/ J 1.,1.: 13 0 q k
- .2-
1.J. , Yj- )..3/3 1 t / CLv- 5 I I, >/13 J': 0 q p y I
Tl"tJILc.- J
'i' .J-/.rJ. H~o "- - 14 r' tH,...t., Smok~; ~c""ec... /11'( ).0: 17 N ,).. 3 !<
.2
'i ).1Y7 R-J L k -t3l...",krrl.k Ca. ,.. ~: rc... /; /(, /If : /1 tv /3 J/y
1) IYl 3;,)., /6 (, ~ 6>c.. l?- :L 7( /1 /3',). '3 D II I
1)./r'j 3'-100 . ~-- 6 ?-~ ~ 7/'7 / L{ : ?> ( 0 /3 ~
i j ~ -v",",
. . .....,.ff. ( , 7/17 f5-
'1 ~ 14 () ). S--": ! t. ~J '."1. . , . O'A~,' I !I:,: 10 D J.I
' - - -r ~........
-- --,
I
9) 14 t 17S-3G. Rd. l....k. ~'od pOS5\btn h e.",,+ '7( .1 2- Y:3Q D 9 }
1.1 1~2.. )sgoo ~oo.""ol<~ f-; .,.~ Q (M.... 1:L&, ) 0:/3 N / q ~
Cj.1. 1ft} L/7 "0 Ill-j~ ~ 7-;(~ ct.l t).r"" 7/;l.~ .)../: ).tj N ).~ J
//:.5 J~ a.l)(\."'ok~ &t 7/ ). q I
~;.J 1C,9 c...~.!i- fl".\'" 9;01 0 10 I
'/ J. / 'is /1/)t7 Pf"Co- i....i ~ tZ d. G...,.. ~,'r ~ >;31 /1,: b 1 0 /S /
q::J..lqt 3/lr /1./9 oJ..., ~ 4 I a. r ""'- // J I Iq :51 N II II
.2..
" ). Jli 7
'1)../~Y. f
7 ). l'i~
n. I