HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC August 18, 1992
,-)
~J
,- )
-..../
DATE:
August 18, 1992
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
','
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes - July 23, 1992
Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - July 28, 1992
Special Planning and Zoning/City Council Minutes - July 28, 1992
Tree Commission Minutes - July 30, 1992
Regular City Council Minutes - August 4, 1992
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes - August 6, 1992
Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - August 11, 1992
Letter from John Davidson, TKDA - August 5, 1992
July Building Department Report
Coon Creek Watershed District Information
Lower Rum River WMO Information
City of Andover Tree Preservation Policy 1992
Ordinance No. 29C
Schedule of Bills
What's Happening
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXI
AGENDA.
THANK vnTT_
~ ~,
. "\
i1l/,
v \"'/
~\ \~ '\'
0TKDA
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
August 5, 1992
TOLTZ. KING, DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
1500 MERITOR TOWER
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUl, MINNESOTA 551 01.2140
PHONE:&1212V2-4400 FAX:61212g2-OO83
Honorable Mayor and City Council
~dover,MUlnesota
Re: ~dover, MUlnesota
Commission No. 9140-002
Dear Mayor and Council:
The following is confirmation of engineering matters discussed at the regular Council Meeting of
August 4, 1992:
1. Right-of-way Acquisition, Project 91-27, Meadows of Round Lake/Eldorado Street
NW
The Council decided to table this item until the September 1, 1992 meeting, pending a
response from the MUlnesota Department of Natural Resources to the latest City of
~dover letter (July 27,1992) addressing alternative routes and overriding public need.
2.
Comprehensive Water Plan Supplemental Report
'\
'--~
Based upon the report and review by Finance Director, Howard Koolick, it was
determined that funds are available to construct the new well and pumphouse.
Council Action
The Council authorized TKDA to proceed with preparation of [mal plans and
specifications of Project 92-13.
3. Meadows of Round Lake, Project 91-27
The City has received complaints from residents that construction traffic and worker" are
driving too fast as they leave the site near 143rd Avenue NW. The Council directed
Public Works to install a temporary stop sign at the intersection of 143rd Avenue NW
and Xenia Street.
4. Consent Agenda
The following items were approved by the Council:
A. Final Plat for Pheasant Meadows
B.
Award Bid to SJ. Louis for Project 92-3, Pinewood Estates - Phase I in the
amount of $696,335.00.
"
o
o
, ,
'J
'\
o
I Honorable Mayor and City Council
August 5, 1992
Page 2
C. Hold Hannless Agreement/Winslow Hills 2nd Addition
D. Change Order No.1, Project 92-7, for Grace Lutheran Watermain in the amount
of $12,216.00.
5. Trunk Sanitary Sewer to Pinewood Estates, Project 92.8
A right-of-entry is to be signed Frida~st--7,-1992, by the property owners to allow
construction to begin wi~ easement between Andover Boulevard and Coon Creek.
In the event the property owners do not sign the right-of-entry agreement on Friday, the
Council authorized a re-bid of the project.
Sincerely yours,
:JZ~cP~
Thomas A. Syfko, P.E.
TAS:j
~
~
~J
\
',J
, ,
'-)
AGENDA
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS
August 10, 1992
7:30 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Open Mike
POLICY ITEMS
4. Approval of Minutes
5. Receive Monthly Financial Statements
6. Approve Bills
7. Legislative Issues and MAWD Resolutions
PERMIT ITEMS
8. Chester Wildlife Pond (PAN 92-55)
9. Berg Driveway to Property (PAN 92-56)
DISCUSSION ITEMS
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
10. Receive Staff Report
NEW BUSINESS
ADJOURN
~ Cc-
<3/1t!97,
,.~~ EC E~ VE-
HI HUG 6 1992 IU
,-
CITY OF ANDOVER
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS' MEETING
July 27, 1992
The Board of Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed District held
their regular meeting on July 27, 1992 at the Bunker Hills
Activities Center.
Present: Bob Boyum, Reggie Hemmes, Eldon Mentges, LuEllen
Richmond, Paul Williams.
Staff: Tim Kelly, Kathy Tingelstad, Harold Sheff, Michelle
Ulrich, Ed Hatthiesen.
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:32 p.m.
2. Approval of the Agenda: Amended so that item number 10, Park
Construction discussion, was moved to the end of the agenda. The
item will be discussed in executive session following adjournment
of the regular meeting. Moved by Williams, seconded by Richmond.
Motion carried with four yeas (Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and
Williams) and no nays. Boyum was absent for the vote.
3. Open Mike: No one was present to speak on this item.
Policy Items
4. Approval of July 13, 1992 Hinutes: Motion to approve minutes
was moved by Williams, seconded by Richmond. Motion carried with
four yeas (Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Boyum was absent for the vote.
\
'J
5. Lake and Stream Monitoring Contract (file 6-2-92-1): Kelly
presented this item. There was discussion on the use of the
information and about a change in a few of the contract
stipulations. Matthiesen said he uses the lake level information
for information on District hydrology. Motion to approve the
agreement was moved by Williams, seconded by Richmond. Motion
carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and
Williams) and no nays.
6. Proposed 1993 Draft Budget (file 3-3-92-2): Kelly presented
this item. The draft budget detail was distributed at the Board
meeting. It showed a 1.4X increase in the budget from 1992 and a
3~ increase in the amount levied through property taxes. The
limitation is that only six of the identified projects could be
funded: Creekview Pond, Pinger's Plaza Structure, Lower Sand
Creek, Sand Creek Rip-rap '1, Sand Creek Rip-rap '2, and Lower
Coon Creek Rip-rap. There were questions about insurance, debt
payment, fund balances, contingency reserve, stream order and
whether the levy increase could be higher than 3~. The central
discussion was about the possibility of funding the Ditch 39
project. There was no consensus on whether to fund a project like
this district-wide, or on a sub-watershed basis. Richmond
suggested that a one-evening workShop be held to only discuss
this topic. Staff was directed to investigate the hearing process
and the costs to pursue a sub-watershed district. In addition,
staff will investigate administrative fund balances to see if
there are any extra funds available. Motion was made to direct
staff to complete applications to the Anoka Conservation District
for cost-share grants on three projects. Moved by Richmond,
seconded by Boyum. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes,
Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Permit Items
\
~)
J".". z7
Page 2. Coon Creek Watershed District - ,k,.... rr. 1992
'1
'\.J
7. Pioneer Village Apartments 2nd Add. (file 2-1-92-51):
Matthiesen presented this item. The purpose of this project is
construction of three apartment buildings on about 6 acres in
Blaine. Mathiesen presented this application. The Board
expressed concern about the number of things that staff had to do
in the permit review for this project. Brian Munsetter from Sunde
Engineering was in attendance and explained the situation.
Matthiesen stated that the stipulations were straight-forward.
The Managers expressed their satisfaction with stipulation .4
about the skimmer, so that the current litter problem on ditch 60
might be addressed. Based on the findings in the permit review,
it was recommended to approve the permit with the following
stipulations: 1. Emergency overflows be constructed around catch
basins at Buildings Band C or these buildings be placed high
enough so that flooding of the buildings would not occur, or a
secondary pipe be installed at each low area, 2. The 100-year
elevation be provided for each building. 3. Hydraulic grade line
be shown extending through each of the catch basins to show that
the hydraulic grade line will be at least 1.5 feet below the top
of the casting, 4. Water Quality ponding be provided with a
skimmer for the one-year design storm for runoff from the entire
site, or skimmer be provided at the Pioneer Village Shopping
Center Pond, 5. Receipt of erosion control escrow of $800, and 6.
The applicant contact the HPCA concerning NPDES permit
reQuirements since the area to be graded is greater than five
acres. Hotion to approve the permit with stipulations was moved-'
by Williams and seconded by Boyum. Motion carried with five yeas
(Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
,
i
'-J
8. Pinewood Estates Utilities (file 2-1-92-52): Matthiesen
presented this item. The purpose of this project is utility and
street improvement installation for phase one in Andover. Based
on the findings in the permit review, it was recommended to
approve the permit pending 1. Receipt of a schedule defining
construction of the outlet, and 2. Receipt of erosion control
escrow of $625 from the contractor. Motion was moved by Richmond
and seconded by Hentges to approve the permit with stipulations.
Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond,
and Williams) and no nays.
9. Knoll--Ditch 41 Cleaning (file 2-1-92-53): Kelly presented
this item. The purpose of this project is to clean out
approximately 300 feet of ditch 41 downstream of 117th Street in
Blaine. It was noted that the adjoining part of ditch 41 would be
cleaned soon and that a public meeting for affected residents in
Blaine would be held before the end of August. There was a
discussion about waiving the erosion control escrow since the
project would be done in coordination with District staff. Based
on the findings in the permit review, it was recommended to
approve the permit, pending the following stipulations:
1. Project be done under close supervision of District staff,
2. Project be coordinated with the City of Blaine for locating
utility crossings and work on 117th, and 3. Excavation
approximate the depth and profile of ditch 41 according to the
approved plans. Hotion was moved by Hentges and seconded by Boyum
to approve the permit with three stipulations. Motion carried
with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams)
and no nays.
Informational Item
BWSR Session on Being Aware of District Responsibilities: An
information sheet on this August 18-19 training session wss
included in the Board packet. The Board appointed Williams and
Kelly to attend. Ho action was needed on this item.
'\
,
,-j
Hew Business
.
J,,<r" .27,
Page 3. Coon Creek Watershed District - 'YRa 1~, 1992
,~
There was a brief discussion about the August 10 Board of
Hanagers meeting and that Hemmes and Richmond will not be
present. Since Boyum, Hentges and Williams are all planning to
attend, the meeting will be held as planned.
Adjournment
Hemmes noted that the Hanagers would be going into executive
session. Due to the confidentiality of the discussion concerning
the contract with Park Construction, the public was asked to
leave. The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. on a motion by
Richmond. seconded by Williams. Hotion carried with five yeas
(Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Reginald A. Hemmes, President
'\
'J
'\
"-,.--I
" '
~
o
~ c_c.
r/r8jq :?-
2015
LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEl~NT
ANDOVER - ANOKA - COON RAPIDS -
MEETING NOTICE
~ursday, August 20, 19~- 8:30 a.m. - Committee Room,
. A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
\
0 F.
G.
H.
J.
AGENDA
Call to Order
Roll Call
Minutes of Previous Meetings (June 25, July 15, July 22,
1992)
Treasurer's Report
Payment of Bill s
Report of Officers
Consideration of Communications
Pending Projects/Permit Reviews
1. Second Quarter Reports Andover, Coon Rapids,
Rams ey
2. Update on LRRWMO Permit #92-15 - Ramsey
3. DNR Permit #92-6258, City of Ramsey
4. DNR Permit #93-6019, Dale & Violet Klungness
I.
Old
1.
2.
3.
Business
Rosella Sonsteby Wetland Issue
Water Quality Records/Maintenance
Andover's Storm Drainage Plan
- Jankowski
New
1.
2.
3.
Business
Engineering Contract Discussions - C. Pearson
Joint Powers Agreement Discussions - C. Pearson
General Discussions With Attorney, i.e. By-Law
Amendments/Publication
K. Adjournment
, '\
o
ATTENDANCE:
WMO Members
C. Pearson
REMINDER: THE BILL REVIEW COm1ITTEE WILL l~ET PRIOR TO THE
REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING
~~
~
, ,
o
LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
JULY 15, 1992
. Ef V E-
JUl 2 0 1!l92 D
CALL TO ORDER
.,-
Chairman Jim Schrantz called the meeting t ora6ry~A~~~R
a.m. in the Committee Room of Anoka City Hall. ~
ROLL CALL
Members present were Jim Schrantz, Scott Erickson, and Steve
Jankowski. John Weaver was absent.
Also present was Anoka alternate Ray Schultz.
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Schultz, to APPROVE
THE REGULAR ?1EETING MINUTES OF JUNE 17, 1992, AS PRINTED.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
TREASURER'S REPORT
Erickson presented the Treasurer's Report for the month
ending June 30, 1992. He noted there have been two or three
Barr Engineering bills whereby authorization was given the
Deputy Treasurer to cut the checks in preparation of payment,
but to hold them until the LRRWMO receives a more definitive
breakdown of expenses from the Consulting Engineer.
Account balances during this period showed: Money market
checking account, $10.00~ interest bearing savings account,
$4,830.29, less the permit account balance of $2,827.00, for
a total savings account balance of $2,003.29~ and a certifi-
cate of deposit account balance of $8,OOO.00~ for a total
balance of $12,840.29.
The billings to member cities requesting payment for the
second half year membership dues were handed out to each city
representative at the meeting for delivery to their respec-
tive cities. .
Motion was made by EriCkson, seconded by Jankowski, to
APPROVE THE TREASURER'S REPORT AS PRESENTED.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
July 15, 1992
Page 2
The board noted
Applications as
of $2,677.00.
the receipt of the Summary of Permit Fee
of June 30, 1992, indicating a total balance
PAYMENT OF BILLS
Erickson indicated there were no bills to be considered for
payment.
REPORT OF OFFICERS
Jankowski noted the receipt of a June 29, 1992, letter from
Jan Fa1teisek, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
(DNR), offering pollution sensitivity maps of Minnesota. He
recommended this board order a copy of this information which
~was expected to have a nominal cost.
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Erickson, to DIRECT
THE ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY TO ORDER ONE COPY OF THE POLLU-
TION SENSITIVITY MAPS FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES, AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF SAID INFORMATION
UPON RECEIPT.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Erickson reported he recently attended a four
on wetland delineation. He felt it was
conference.
day conference
an excellent
CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNICATIONS
The board noted a June 29, 1992, letter from the Metropolitan
Council which indicated an upcoming meeting to be held July
14, 1992, in the Brooklyn Park City Council Chambers,
Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. The meeting will address the
reduction of non-point pOllution to metropolitan water
bodies. The board members indicated they would check their
schedules to see if they" would be able to attend this
meeting.
Communications re Rosella Sonsteby Wetland Issue
Schrantz reported he met with Board of Water and Soil
Resources representative Bruce Sandstrom, LRRWMO Consulting
Engineer "Dean Ska1lman, Anoka County Soil and Water
Conservation District Technician Chris Lord, and Rosella
Sonsteby at the wetland site. It was determined Ms. Sonsteby
will probably have to mitigate if she disturbs the wetlands.
Schrantz indicated Ms. Sonsteby said she is not going to do
so.
LRRWMQ Meeting Minutes
July 15, 1992
Page 3
o
PENDING PROJECTS/PERMIT REVIEWS
First Quarter Report - Jankowski
Jankowski indicated the
from the City of Ramsey
a~ the August meeting.
Second Quarter Reports - All Members
first quarter report of activities
is not available. He will provide it
Schultz provided the second quarter report, indicating
construction activities are proceeding. with the Anoka
Technical Center expansion project involving the construction
o~ a detention pond.
The Cities of Andover, Coon Rapids, and Ramsey will provide a
written report of their quarterly activities at the August
meeting.
Update on Mobil Service Station Project
Schultz recalled that the LRRWMO, at its May 20, 1992,
regular meeting, moved to approve the Mobil Service Station
/ , application contingent on the ConSUlting Engineer's positive
~~ response upon review. According to Skallman's June 16, 1992,
review on this project, the water being pumped for the
purpose of cleaning the groundwater is passed through a
treatment system prior to discharge into the Rum River and
will be, essentially, clean water. Schultz reported he
informed Anoka County of Skallman's report.
The board was comfortable with this assessment. No further
action was taken.
Juniper Ridge Partnership - LRRWMO ApDlication #92-2
Jankowski updated the board on the status of LRRWMO Applica-
tion #92-2, the development of a plat involving the construc-
tion of roads and a storm sewer proposed to discharged into
the Rum River after first going into a sediment basin.
Skallman's July 8, 1992, project description and recommenda-
tion indicated previous plans submitted did not have a
skimmer on the outlet of the water quality pond, and the
outlet velocities did not meet the LRRWMO standards.
However, changes have since been coordinated with the
engineer to meet these standards which involve the inclusion
of the skimmer and the increased pipe diameters.
. \
~
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
July 15, 1992
Page 4
Jankowski confirmed the plan has been revised to include a
skimmer.
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Schultz, to APPROVE
LRRWMO PERMIT #92-2, JUNIPER RIDGE PARTNERSHIP.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
The board, upon preparation for telephoning Dean Skal1man
around 9:30 a.m., as previously arranged, reviewed all the
project reviews provided by the Consulting Engineer:
June 15, 1992 Reviews
DNR Permit #92-6219 - Dewatering for utility installation in
the Meadows of Round Lake. The project meets the require-
ments of the LRRWMO.
DNR Permits #92-6237 and #92-6238, LRRWMO Permit #92-15-
operation of dewatering wells and the construction of a storm
sewer outlet and a sedimentation pond with an outlet to a
Class B water, respectively. The velocity of the discharge
does not meet WMO requirements. The sedimentation pond is
not designed to WMO requirements.
Jankowski stated he was not aware Skallman had a problem with
this project. He indicated he will follow up on it.
July 8. 1992. Reviews
DNR Permit #92-6249 - Water appropriation permit for con-
struction of a forcemain in areas adjacent to the Mississippi
River. This application meets the requirements of the
LRRWMO.
LRRWMO Permit #92-03 - Anoka County culvert replacement on
County Road 58. The plan meets the requirements of the
LRRWMO with regard to the water quality permitting. The
permit should require that restoration in the area of the
culvert replacement be completed within the two week time
estimate to minimize the potential for erosion.
OLD BUSINESS
Water Quality Records/Maintenance
Jankowski stated he has
from Barr Engineering.
shall be carried over to
not obtained that
Schrantz indicated
the August meeting.
information yet
this agenda item
\J
~.J
\
,.....)
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
July 15, 1992
Page 5
Andover's Storm Drainage Plan
Schrantz reported Andover's Storm Drainage Plan is just about
ready to go to' the engineer. This agenda item shall also be
carried over to the August meeting.
Update on City of Ramsey Project #91-14
The board reviewed Skallman's June 16, 1992, updated review
on Ramsey . Project. -#9'1-14,-" referencing a letter. from Peter
Raatikkawhich reflects changes and questions discussed with
the Consulting Engineer. Skallman's recommendation indicated
with the changes in .the letter included in the project, the
project meets the requirements of the LRRWMO.
Draft Wetland Policy and Draft Letter to Anoka County
The board extensively discussed the proposed draft LRRWMO
policy addressing wetland mitigation projects for Anoka
County.
In answer to Erickson's query about whether the county would
be required to take out a permit for each project, Schrantz
stated that we have to pay for the project review someway.
Jankowski concurred; we had agreed that everyone, including
the member cities, would be treated the same and would be
required to obtain an LRRWMO application prior to project
construction according to established procedure. He felt it
was a reasonable pOlicy. Schultz concurred. Jankowski felt
that same pOlicy should be established for Anoka County until
it becomes a problem, and then the board can consider a
policy revision.
Discussion ensued relative to the replacement quality of
these wetlands upon construction given that the county would
be allowed to bank up to one acre of disturbed wetlands
before replacement construction would be required. Schrantz
stated the time will soon be here when wetlands will have to
be replaced at the highest quality level of said wetlands
when they were disturbed, as is proposed in the draft pOlicy.
Jankowski agreed that language should be left as it presently
reads, with the idea that the board can review the pOlicy and
make whatever changes it determines necessary at a later
date.
Erickson queried whether the policy should include a sunset
date when the accumulated wetland acreage must be replaced.
Schultz stated he would have no problem with leaving that
issue open ended. However, with regard to the LRRWMO
policies and procedures, he indicated he wants to see them
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
July 15, 1992
Page 6
organized in a manual, with LRRWMO review of them once ~
year. The other board members concurred that they should be
organized and indexed.
Erickson suggested, and the board concurred, a sentence
should be added to the bottom of the first paragraph of the
wetland mitigation pOlicy for Anoka County: "The LRRWMO
board shall review the mitigation plan when the project
occurs.".
Upon further discussion on the definition of the "highest
quality level of the wetlands", Erickson stated the LRRWMO
will have to make the determination on the quality of
wetlands to be constructed on a case by case basis. The
board concurred the policy and letter to Anoka County should
:include language near the end of the first paragraph
indicating, "Said quality level of the newly constructed
wetland shall be determined by the LRRWMO." The
Administrative Secretary agreed to make the appropriate
changes to the pOlicy and letter to Anoka County commission
Chairman Dan Erhart and provide a clean copy for the board's
review and Chairman's signature at its next meeting.
Motion was made by Jankowski. seconded by Schultz, to APPROVE
THE LRRWMO POLICY ADDRESSING WETLAND MITIGATION PROJECTS FOR
ANOKA COUNTY AS AMENDED.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Motion was made by Erickson, seconded by Schultz, to APPROVE
THE LETTER DRAFTED TO ANOKA COUNTY COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DAN
ERHART ADDRESSING THE LRRWMO POLICY ON COUNTY WETLAND
MITIGATION PROJECTS, AS AMENDED.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Schrantz stated, and the board concurred, after an LRRWMO
permit has been approved and signed, the Administrative
Secretary should see that a copy of same is sent to the
applicant for his/her information.
Jankowski conversed with Skallman via the telephone about a
number of concerns discussed by the board. His response was:
Permit #92-15 - Skallman could not find a where a check was
submitted with the LRRWMO application. He was unable to do a
thorough review due to a lack of information. Jankowski
stated he will see that an application and fee is provided
for this project review. Skallman's concerns will be
addressed in order to meet LRRWMO requirements.
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
July 15, 1992
Page 7
CJ
Anoka County Mitigation Policy - Skallman reportedly com-
mented that it was reasonable to require wetlands to be
restored to the highest quality. . His reasoning was the
LRRWMO is giving the county a break by banking the small
projects. Also, the county will have one big project where
it can pick and choose the optimum location for construction.
Review of the Dewatering Permit Review Procedure
The board discussed the draft Dewatering Permit Review
Procedure. Schrantz indicated these permits will be coming
through the DNR. He would prefer to let the DNR deal with
the majority of the dewatering permit reviews, unless we are
aware of something they are not, with the LRRWMO reviewing
DNR comments. Erickson stated the DNR will 'be sending them
to the LRRWMO Consulting Engineer for his review also.
:J
Considerable discussion ensued with regard to the proposed
procedure. The Administrative Secretary noted where an
addition could be made, second to last sentence of the first
paragraph, and recommended the fOllowing insertion: "... by
the Consulting Engineer. Upon discussion between the Consul-
ting Engineer and the aporooriate City Engineer. whereby a
concurrence has been reached that a project may proceed prior
to the full LRRWMO board's review and approval, the City
Engineer may inform the applicant of the permitted action.
The City Engineer shall provide a written report on this
activity to the LRRWMO. II
Discussion followed relative to, before an applicant is given
the go ahead to proceed with the dewatering project, how many
LRRWMO members should be involved in this decision along with
the Consulting Engineer.
The portion of the draft June 25, 1992, special meeting
minutes discussing the dewatering permit procedure was read.
Considerable discussion ensued on who would pay for the
review of the dewatering permits and how that process would
work. The board concurred as long as it receives an itemized
list of project reviews from the Consulting Engineer, assign-
ing the expenses to the proper project account should be easy
enough. The question arose on what to do should a dewatering
permit be reviewed but there is no project account against
which to assess the review expense. Schultz felt the LRRWMO
should establish a policy to either pay all dewatering
permits or bill them back to the cities. The LRRWMO could
bill the cities for these dewatering permit review fees
perhaps once every six months, maybe in conjunction with
payment of the membership dues.
. \
~
1- r
j'
, 'j'
'--...I
\
'--...I
o
if
'"
LOVlER RUM
DfCEiVE--
"(AUG 719921JJr
,-
CITY OF AN"OV~~
RIVER WATERSHED ~~GEMENT ORGANIZATION
SPECIAL MEETnlG OF THE
JULY 22, 1992
. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Jim Schrantz called the meeting to order at 8:30
a.m. in the Engineering Conference Room of Anoka City Hall.
ROLL CALL
Members present were Jim Schrantz, Scott Erickson, Steve
Jankowski, and John Weaver.
ACTION ITEMS
Contract for Consulting Engineering Services
The board discussed that the LRRWMO is required by law to go
out for bids for its Consulting Engineering contract every
two years. Schrantz recalled that before the board discussed
it would prefer to hire an engineering firm that does not
work for any of the LRRWMO member cities. Weaver indicated
Barr Engineering has done work for the City of Anoka;
although, he agreed he could see the importance of having a
non-participating consultant.
The board discussed some of the elements which an updated
contract should include, but not be limited to: the
Consulting Engineer should keep an accurate accounting of his
time, a detailed billing system should be maintained, review
permits sent to him from the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (DNR), review dewatering permits according to
LRRWMO policy, review and advise the board on LRRWMO permit
applications according to pOlicy, etc.
Schrantz noted that LRRWMO activities are continually becom-
ing more complicated. He queried whether the Administrative
Secretary or someone should be keeping the board abreast of
some of the things going on and remind the board about what
it should be doing. He further noted the board should have
gone through the Joint Powers Agreement and had that updated.
Weaver suggested the board invite its attorney to the August
meeting to help it address many of these issues. In the mean
time, we should refer to our attorney the LRRWMO engineering
services contract and have him prepare one that is up to
date, calling upon his extensive experience with other
watersheds and WMO's. Weaver further suggested perhaps
LRRWMO Special Meeting Minutes
July 22, 1992
Page 2
Person could,- at the August meeting, provide an update on
water policies.
Erickson recalled that the LRRWMO was holding off on having
its Joint Powers Agreement updated until the Minnesota Board
of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) comes up with its new
rules. Schrantz felt those BWSR rules will be a second
generation plan and will not be due until 1995. That should
not involve our Joint Powers Agreement. Schrantz suggested
the board discuss this with Pearson in August.
Motion was made by Weaver, seconded for discussion by
Jankowski, to INVITE ATTORNEY CURTIS PEARSON TO THE LRR~10'S
NEXT MEETING. PRIOR TO THAT MEETING THE LEGAL CONSULTANT
SHALL REVIEW AND PROVIDE AN UPDATED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
AND AN UPDATED PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES AND
ANY OTHER DOCUMENTS THAT IS RELEVANT TO OUR IMMEDIATE WORK
AND IN THE NEl-.R FUTURE. (See the amendment to the motion
later in discussion.)
Jankowski agreed with the need for the preparation of a Joint
Powers Agreement but indicated he was not sure that the
engineering contract needed to be prepared by an attorney.
He suggested, with regard to the engineering contract, that
requests be taken for qualifications from some of the firms
capable of providing engineering services; ~~en, upon
interviewing them, ask for a proposed contract. Jankowski
suggested letting the engineering firm do the ground work;
the LRRWMO can review and modify the firm's proposed contract
as we want.
Schrantz felt we should not advertise at this point in time.
He suggested obtaining a proposed contract for engineering
services from Barr Engineering and others, review them all,
and send them to our attorney to put together.
Weaver directed that the motion be amended, agreed upon by
Jankowski, to ASK THE LRRiVHO LEGAL COUNSEL TO WORK ON AN
UPDATED JOINT POWERS AGREE~m}IT, TO PROVIDE SAMPLES OF AN
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES CONTRACT, AND, FURTHER, TO
PROVIDE l-~ UPDATE ON WATER MANAGEMENT ISSUES FROM THE
ATTORNEY I S PERSPECTIVE AS OUR LEGAL COUNSEL. THE LRRWMO
ATTORNEY SHALL FIRST PROVIDE THE BOARD WITH A PRICE QUOTE FOR
HIS SERVICES IN UPDATING THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT, ALONG
WITH THE COSTS FOR HIS SERVICES IN UPDATING THE CONSULTING
ENGINEERING CONTRACT.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
'j.
~ I
..-
. '.~
1/
P
.
~.
\
,~
~)
LRRWMO Special Meeting Minutes
July 22, 1992
Page 3
Schrantz noted a JUly 15, 1992, memorandum from Ron Harnack,
Executive Director of the Minnesota BWSR, addressing the need
for developing Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) record keeping
procedures. Schrantz stated the board must start keeping
accurate records of staff time, mileage, and expenses locally
incurred for the duties listed in the memorandum: wetland
project screening, replacement plan review, WCA enforcement,
and general administration and maintenance of local records.
Dewatering Policy
The board discussed the proposed dewatering permit' review
procedure. Weaver queried whether the proper procedure
should include an LRRWMO review prior to approval by the
local municipality. Schrantz stated the DNR has been handl-
ing these dewatering permits for years. He felt it proper,
and expedient, that the board grant its ConSUlting Engineer,
and appropriate city engineer per project, administrative
authority for dewatering permits. The LRRWMO board will then
review those activities at its next meeting.
Jankowski indicated he feels that is a reasonable policy
because dewatering is temporary in nature.
Schrantz added the DNR responds to each dewatering permit
request because that agency issues a permit. Jankowski felt
it appropriate that the LRRt~10 engineer make comments on each
dewatering permit application on behalf of the board.
Erickson queried how the LRRWMO will collect the fees from
the applicant; prior to dewatering? Jankowski felt the cost
to review these permits, which will normally be minimal, will
be on a time spent basis. The Consulting Engineer will issue
a bill to the LRRvlMO identifying the city who is responsible
for payment. The board will have to go back to the
respective cities for additional monies. Erickson felt it
might be better to collect up front~ the contractor might be
long gone after the dewatering has been completed.
Schrantz raised the issue of what if the dewatering permit is
not a city, but rather a private project. Who pays for these
costs then? Erickson felt that dewatering permits should
take a maximum of one-half hour to review. Schrantz
suggested these dewatering permit review costs be included ~n
our project costs.
Weaver queried how Andover handles its entire project review
process, including dewatering permit requests. With
Schrantz's response that everything goes to the Coon Creek
Watershed, the DNR, Health Department, Metropolitan Council,
LRRWMO Special Meeting Minutes
July 22, 1992
Page 4
etc. , Weaver
collect a fee
review process.
determined that
for dewatering
perhaps
permits
the LRRWMO should
at the time of the
Jankowski and Schrantz indicated they had no problem with the
dewatering permit review process as first proposed. Erickson
stated dewatering should not be separate; it should be under
the full plan review. Weaver noted the minor changes as
submitted in writing by Anoka alternate Ray Schultz. The
other members felt these suggested changes would be accept-
able and would not change the basic intent of the proposed
dewatering procedure.
Jankowski stated the LRRWMO can try this dewatering permit
review procedure for awhile. If we find we are not able to
~ollect for this review process in some way, the policy can
be amended later. Erickson stated the success of this
procedure will depend on the Consultant Engineer keeping good
records. He felt when we actually go through the procedure
it will work itself out. Weaver added his only concern is
that every cost initiated from a specific community be paid
by that community and not come out of our LRRWMO budget.
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Schrantz, to ADOPT
THE DEWATERING PERMIT REVIEW PROCEDURE AS PROPOSED WITH THE
MINOR LANGUAGE CHANGES SUBMITTED BY RAY SCHULTZ.
Upon discussion the board concurred the Consulting Engineer
will not be doing anything different than he is doing now
when he reviews materials the DNR sends him. The only thing
different is we will send the bill on to the appropriate
city. The board confirmed its ongoing philosophy that
whoever uses LRRWMO services, pays for them.
VOTE: 4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Schrantz reviewed the updated letter to Anoka County
Commissioner Dan Erhart, as approved at the board's July 15,
1992, regular meeting, addressing the LRRWMO'S policy on
banking small amounts of mitigated wetlands for the county.
Weaver recommended the letter include by what authority this
board is assuming responsibility as a Local Unit of
Government over the interim regulation of wetlands.
Motion was made by Erickson, seconded by Weaver, to AMEND THE
LETTER TO ANOKA COUNTY COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DAN ERHART,
RELATIVE TO THE LRRWMO'S POLICY ON ALLOWING ANOKA COUNTY TO
BANK SMALL AMOUNTS OF MITIGATED WETLANDS, UP TO ONE (1) ACRE
IN SIZE, TO INDICATE THE BOARD ASSUMES ITS RESPONSIBILITY FOR
LRRWMO Special Meeting Minutes
JUly 22, 1992
Page 5
':~.
THE INTERIM REGULATION OF WETLANDS IN THE CAPACITY OF LOCAL
UNIT OF GOVERNMENT THROUGH THE 1991 WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Discussion continued on who would be keeping track of these
small accruals of 1-~oka County mitigation projects. Mikkonen
indicated she would set up some sort of record keeping file
for this on-going activity. The board went on to discuss
whether or not the county would submit a $500 fee each time
the board had to review a mitigation plan. Schrantz suggested
retaining an extra $50 from each little project to be used,
eventually, for mitigation plan review. He added if that
number does not work, the board would have to change it.
. Upon further discussion about the LRRWMO permit application
form, Mikkonen agreed to alter it to include a sign-off
portion on the bottom containing the Chairman's Signature and
date of the permit approval.
~.J
Policy Manual
The board discussed the need to establish a manual of some
sort to include the LRRWMO approved pOliCies/procedures, its
engineering and legal consultant contracts, the Joint Powers
Agreement, and any other important documents relative to the
operation of the LRRWMO. It was determined that one such
manual would be provided for each member city representative
and one for the LRRWMO main files. Should each member city
choose to provide said manual for its alternates, that city
will do so at its own expense.
Motion was made by Erickson, seconded by Jankowski, to
AUTHORIZE THE CREATION OF THIS "ADHINISTRATIVE MANUAL" AND TO
AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY TO PURCHASE THE
NECESSARY SUPPLIES IN ORDER TO PUT THIS ~roAL TOGETHER AS
DIRECTED.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Discussion on Changing the LRRWMO Regular Meeting Date
Weaver indicated he continues to have a meeting conflict on
the third Wednesdays of each month. He queried whether the
regular meeting dates could be permanently changed,
suggesting perhaps the third Thursday. Erickson, at this
point, announced that he would be resigning from the LRRW}!O
in order that he might assume a position in the City of
Fridley. It was noted that a permanent meeting date change
would require an amendment to the by-laws.
, '.
'-~
LRRWMO special Meeting Minutes
July 22, 1992
Page 6
Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Erickson, to AMEND
THE LRRWMO BY-LAWS TO CHANGE THE REGULAR MEETING DATE FROM
THE THIRD WEDNESDAY TO THE THIRD THURSDAY OF EACH MONTH
EFFECTIVE THE AUGUST 1992 REGULAR MEETING, SUBJECT TO THE
PROPER NOTIFICATION AS DETERMINED BY THE LRRWMO LEGAL
COUNSEL.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Budget Discussions - ADDE~IDu}!
Board members noted that this body needs to establish its
1993 budget and to let the member cities know their 1993
financial responsibilities to the LRRWMO. Erickson, LRRWMO
Treasurer, indicated he did not know who would be assigned as
the Coon Rapids representative to the LRRWMO in his absence.
Weaver and Schrantz suggested perhaps Coon Rapids might
consider reassigning Tom Mathisen, a previous Coon Rapids
representative to the LRRWMO, at the very least on a
temporary basis, in order to maintain fiscal continuity
during this budgetary period. Erickson indicated he would
make every attempt to bring the fiscal portion of this
board's activities up to date prior to his leaving Coon
Rapids's employment.
Upon discussion of what the LRRWMO's total budget would have
to be for 1993, it was noted there are no more reserves from
which to access; the budget will have to increase at least to
this year's level.
Erickson stated we might have to budget a little more for
attorney fees in order to get the LRRWMO's Joint Powers
Agreement updated and to get the board up to speed on the new
rules coming out. However, he noted $3,500 had been pre-
viously budgeted to cover costs of the Joint Powers Agreement
update; that may be enough. He also noted' there are still
checks that have been cut for engineering bills which have
not been sent out because Barr Engineering has not provided a
proper breakdown of expenses. However, he felt the
engineering budget line item was pretty good for next year.
In fact, Erickson stated the LRRWMO may be pretty close to
expenditures in each of the budget line items.
Jankowski recalled that $2,000 was used from reserves to pay
for insurance. Schrantz concurred, adding that the budget
was $14,600 plus a $3,000 carry over, for a total budget of
$17,600 in 1992. The board agreed to retain the same total
budget for 1993 as in 1992, but should add a three (3) per
cent inflation amount, which would bring the 1993 budget to
LRRWMO Special Meeting Minutes
July 22, 1992
Page 7
, ,
\J
$18,200. Schrantz indicated the inflationary percentage
might change depending on valuation. Erickson stated he
would contact Anoka County for valuation figures.
Weaver agreed with the proposed budgetary -plans and asked if
Erickson could provide each member city representative with
this information before he leaves, indicating that the
LRRWMO's 1993-94 bUdget will be $18,200, to be distributed
accordingly. The board will review this information at its
August meeting prior to being sent out to member cities.
Erickson's Resignation - ADDENDUM
The board offered Erickson congratulations on his career
advancement and expressed appreciation for his past efforts
as Treasurer and active member of the LRRWMO.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further discussion, Chairman Schrantz declared
the special LRRWMO meeting adjourned.
Time of adjournment: 11:00 a.m.
, !
" ./
Respectfully submitted,
1Z~ 71~
Mava Mikkonen
Administrative Secretary
~-)
'\
I
'~
'- )
\
'.J
**************************************
*****************************::************************************~.
*<<***************** ..
<<<< ..
<<<< ..
<<<< ..
<<<< ..
<<<< ..
!i . WHArS~A~PENING 1- ii
<<<< ..
<<<< ..
<<<< ..
<<<< ).~..
<<<< ..
<<<< ..
<<<< .'"
<<<< ..
<<<< August 18, 1992 ..
<<<< ..
<<<< ..
<<<< ..
:: - Filing dates for Mayor and Council - August 25, ::
<<<< 1992 8:00 a.m. to September 8, 1992 at 5:00 p.m. ..
<<<< ..
<<<< Filing fee for all offices - $2.00 ..
<<<< ..
<<<< ..
<<<< - The individual who hit one of our fire trucks ..
:: that was on a mutual aid call to Coon Rapids did ::
<<;c not pay the damages that were ordered by the ..
<<;c ..
;C;c Court. He was to appear in court again on ..
:: August 11 th and failed to appear. A warrant has ::
<<;c been issued for his arrest. ..
<<<< ..
;C;c ..
<<;c - Attached is a letter from Bill Hawkins ..
;C;c . . ..
<<<< dlscusslng procedures available to (Firefighter) ..
;C;c Steve Brown. ..
<<<< ..
;C;c ..
:: Bill is out of town until next week at which ::
;C;c time Dale and I hope to meet with Bill to review ..
;C;c . h ..
;c<< Steve Brown's suspenslon, is complaints against ",.
;c<< Dale and I, etc. ..
<<<< ..
-lei( .:1fo
<<;c ..
<<<< ..
<<<< ..
;c<< ..
<<<< ..
;C;c ..
<<;c ..
;C;c ..
;C;c ..
<<;c ..
<<<< ..
<<;c ..
<<;c ..
;c<< ..
';c<< ..
<<<< ..
<<<< ..
;C;c ..
;C;c ..
;C;c ..
;e;c ..
;e;c ..
;e;c ..
;e;c ....
;ele- .r ..
;e;c ..
;e;c ..
;e;c ..
;C;c ..
;e;e ..
;e;c ..
.;e;c ..
;e<< ..
;e;c , *******************************:
;e<<****************************~~...............................
.~~~~~......~~...~~~~~~~~~....
,- "
\_~
,J
'\
)
LAW OFF!CES OF'
Eurie Ilnd JlllwkiJts
JOHN M. BURKE
WTLUAM G. H.....WKINS
SUITE 101
299 COON AAPlDS BOULEVARO
COON AAPlDS. MINNESOTA 5~33
PHONE (6 12) 784-2998
August 10,
R'~" E c. r:"! iF"'--
. _~a!!t
!"JI~ 1 , 1;;7ll
Mr. James E. Schrantz
Andover City Hall
1685 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
.-
CITY OF' ANDOVEf?
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
I am writing in response to your inquiry concerning the proce-
dures available to Mr. steve Brown, a member of the Andover Fire
Department for his suspension. The Bylaws of the Andover Fire
Department are very specific concerning the suspension of
members and the procedures that must be followed. The Bylaws
provide that the Chief of the organization has the right to
suspend an individual. If such suspension is placed in effect,
the member has seven (7) days to appeal to the Grievance
Committee. Following action by the Grievance Committee, either
the Chief or the Fire Department has the right to appeal to the
membership. Two-thirds of the members must vote to lift the
suspension. It is my understanding that Mr. Brown has been
before the Grievance Committee and the Fire Department
membership as a whole and is still unhappy with the upholding of
his suspension. These are the procedures that are set out in
the Bylaws and there are no further appeals that are allowed for
suspensions therein. I believe Mr. Brown has been afforded due
process and unfortunately is not satisfied with the results.
There are no further avenues of appeal for him and he will have
to accept the suspension.
WGH: rnk
cc: Mr. 'Dale Mashuga
o
,~
....,
CITY of ANDOVER
Regular City Council Meeting-August 18, 1992
Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Discussion Items
1. Approve Revised Feasibility StudyjWatt's Garden Acres
2. Public Hearing/92-18/Jay Street
3. Special Use Permit/Real Estates Signs/Meadows of Round Lake
4. Special Use Permit/Area Identification Signs/Meadows of
Round Lake
5. Special Use Permit/Area Identification SignjWeybridge
6. Variance/1332 - 137th Lane N.W./S. Ham
7. Adopt Ordinance/Deferred Assessment Policy
Staff, Committee, Commission
,.J
8. Approve Settlement AgreementjWiatrak v. J. Lund Const.
9. Appoint Election Judges
10. Approve Newsletter Contract
11. Road Committee Report
Non-Discussion Items
12. Approve Resolution/Functional Reclassification of Minor
Arterials
13. Award Bid/92-l0/Pheasant Meadows
14. Award Bid/92-l5/Hidden Creek East 5th Addition
15. Approve Plans & SpecsjWell #4
16. Approve Final Payment/91-l9
17. Approve Final Payment 91-25
18. Rescind Resolution 78-6
19. Adopt Resolution/PIR Fund Reimbursement
20. Adopt Resolution Designating Depository
21. Receive July Financial Statements
Mayor/Council Input
Approval of Claims
Adjournment
" )
CITY OF ANDOVER
:]
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
August 18, 1992
ITEM
NO.
Approval of Minutes
Admin. .(~,
V. Volk I),
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Approval of Minutes
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
August 4, 1992
Regular Meeting (Jacobson absent)
'-
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
\.-
CITY OF ANDOVER
>,
,..J
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 18, 1992
DATE
BY:
Todd J. Haas
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering ~
ITEM Feasibili ty study/
NO. Watt's Garden Acres
The City Council is requested to approve the revised feasibility
report for project 92-18, Jay street in Watt's Garden Acres.
The addition made to the feasibility report is the area and
lateral storm sewer cost that was levied by the City of Coon
Rapids against the City of Andover.
The area west of Jay street was previously assessed. The area
east of Jay street will be assessed in accordance with the
formula on the attached pages.
The attachments to be included in the report are Page 4A and
Exhibit E.
'-
John Davidson of TKDA will be at the meeting to discuss the
addition to the report.
MOTION BY
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
~~l TO
~,J
'-.J
, )
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO. R
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING AMENDMENTS (PAGE 4A AND EXHIBIT E) TO THE
FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF STORM SEWER, PROJECT
NO. 92-18 IN THE WATT'S GARDEN ACRES/JAY STREET N.W. AREA.
WHEREAS, such amendments to the
received by the City Council on the
1992.
feasibility report were
18th day of August
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover that:
1. The City Council hereby accepts the amendments to
the feasibility report for Project No. 92-18 for the
improvement of storm sewer.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted
by the City Council at a
Regular
meeting this 18th
day of
August , 1992, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution and
Councilmen
voting against,
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Attest:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
.\
'-J
,J
, \
,~ )
--
Trunk Storm Sewer Rate
In 1989, the City of Coon Rapids levied an area and lateral storm sewer cost against
the City of Andover. The storm sewer and drainage improvements were provided with
the construction of 133rd Avenue NW. Rates were as follows:'
Trunk Storm Sewer
Lateral Storm Sewer
$ 881.24/ Acre
2.482.36/ Acre
$3,363.60/ Acre
Total
Average 80' x 150' Lot = 0.275 Acre
.275 Acre x $3.363.60/Acre =
$926.61
Note: Area west of Jay Street was previously assessed. The area east of Jay Street
will be assessed in accordance with the formula outlined above.
-4A-
1n?1q
--r-"l ---- - -__~~ __ --'- ------ --
------- ---.
--- .__._~~~~~~~- ..~_..~~=--=-=--.' --- -,.----.-..----.-- .
;J~~ .'...'=--=
,I ,.,.;.I:.::...,.~
'.;':..'... ,::C" I':;',} i. .
\'....', . . ""': i . ..'...:r' '. ,,:..
..",.... ,... ..- ,.:., , ".;"~::;'~:\.<'II"""':':i'~"\" ,.:,~ '-,
"" ..P'.l~:.{, .,', ..' :,'.1,(: ~~. .
,'" . I '., " '" l'~.., .i. '-HVlfJ
) .."," .', ....... i'. :'.,: :'?;'. . '~~;,r(
I .:. I I " ...:. .~' j' ,: . ,'. .,~:,.!J~~'~1'!\' I,\,J I.\'
(' " ' , .....1 I ,\~,I':''' ., Jr\ ' ,/~, Ii t' ~
I .:" I,' . ':" , I" :...';..jJ~'~ .""..,,1
..':';: :~. ;'i:I':~:"">>'V'{;'~"~"i";~I:'~':'r~!I:: 'i':L111" . ,/"
, I'''" ,I '. I It,'~' ~ j' .' .;" r. ~" , .' 1'. L,'T. \
1 ' ,I- '.' "l,rilI ' ,I '. ,1..~"" I ....r _,,,',..1 ~ ,~.' ,~
::;,~' ~..' . I:" . .'~'".'~lt\:~,:1:}l-6:, ~,' 'I'
1 11~J~ 'f ;'~:l :." .., .,r.:, ;<,.,,~, ~:'l\~~'~~"';) ,,.
; ::; . :"'1"; '. ". ' ..." ',.,:;.! ;" ~...,,:N' II
. . ",... f' )'~ "',, r~..t'(<{l'.n l',,~'f:,~ t:
..._1...., h...., , ' ",:""~" ,.l, {I:...~.r{.\.j,:;,j./,~'"'. Ii:
I -- -- .,.. '\:11' .,.1., :;7~y~j~i~1,~~~,~~; f;1;,:i':,~1~~~~:;i;;~.~~$S., "'),i (. ~i'&"" '
II I~'=~~fl'~;;ijtjjj~* ~fv'--" i {'..fr~!1 ~!~ r
~ l / " >";:~'.:~'~:'''~.t ,;~~:~,,;., .,; ~,~ '-
~ ("'I,!'.'~t.,~,\",.:, ',.'J":"l \~ipi " f. I --- .
. .... J'~"J""" "1;'-" I..J'~~ i
! ,;' /.~: ~)'.'l~1jlft.'s;~J r>i-Yi!~'..~' It . 1----- - ---".-
.. ,"'1 'ill: '~'VI:';.ttf" '.'f.:'\~,if.'" "',-':'. ,
_ 0 i",l",t.\ ,'\',t' :~l~ ,;'J,;".j .'.,jl::rlr:.!, '~r '.T. I
o ) ~l...~~.j.)i:,~~-",;,;,,,'.~:'Jt;:l1 . ,~~;i:1,~J)~;, It,~\ ,..: ;'1t:t,.,. '. ,\.
1 ID. tf~t:GJ.\l.~'\IWJ.J J.'.:i:\~sH. ':~~\;,d6~,.,,: ~'i\.,..,:.,~~'" !. 'l~".~~. '. I I .;
~r ....,;...-.".. ..,,:":,;'..",':.' ~".}~:~~~~~~~~~".~:.i~:,~; ''''1:-6 iJ; .
_ \ -,~.M, ""..... .' .... ..' , 'W'.'''''
i I I t I :. 'i.~" 'I~'~ ) i "~,fi~,1.\~i;;t~!,~:1t 'IIII-I.,..LL I ' J/
I ' 'I' k" ,.~~' ,,-,v ,. 111
If---.' i 'lloi;~l.'~"" 1 ~t.~ ~t J I [[I T~ [[I ----
I I I ~,.:.; ".. ,';Ii;"~" .....,', ~ ~ ,--
..; ,,~! 1\' ~ I f'O;..:,;' " : 0::. ~~, r:~.~i::' . fltl . ~H ,- -~ --
I. . i ~;~.! ,,'.1 '~'y:'I'::-I'id... ,"-.:.; ";i~.. .i~':<- ~; .--- .--
',~__ I ./1""" ,)l'll::, "F','~',\,'", \, ;";.i.~,"'" ,'~.i.'.'! I -,.A'
f i (-- j" '.'i' .". 1i.'~' ',". ',' ~"-'" .-77: --, :;':J:.:: ~'->-- ''';::::;
l '. i~ 1~~/~~~ ,~;1;i,r; _ ~ ~ if 'i;;!@ r: _ t L~~\
---r-' -.._,- II::-r - L2LLLLM / ;~.1 .Jj .:--. r ,L.~
" - -----r~~r "~'(' :,jrnt0 ihu T 1'7\ i'i/I:? ll:JI::
_. l i ef3' \ .,.....1 !il I ~ ~ : I 1:::.-r"'''l~'E1- '" j/
Q. en ) ]IJ;; --~' )...) Y -: t 1 I Ill~ - \
. <en . I I ~ 1-1-: 1- ., I II ..
~=.:::.r= I ~.__. i, ~~! I ~"",'1u'~~\-~H=~ ::iII .1~rTT1~~'>.
~ oce! ( ,.r.' ~I-~!~',Y~~~ "1 '/IIL', ')
3 . 0 OJ' ... -' 'r --'l . \" ..... ' 'I' .;z" .. I...
i ..i i ()... ~' ! /71<;]1 r~: ~ ,~,,-. .. ~"". ",~,,,,t\~' h
." ' '"'" 11t7'" : ,10' .,' ..r:'i \:', /.,/
, / JY' '. ~ 'ft':'...' ..1".'''' i"~' ...,. f
1----:"1: =r:c...L ,_..I. ,_ '.._ ,_ _. ,I . ,I" \','. ..... ...'.,,,;'! (. ',. ;,'
.. . i ~ - ,..-. 0 r -+- ,0," 'i"'J....}'.'" .,'1'. .
, .. ': >" ,". '. "'" " . ' . ~';V.~"I.~~~ d~ 'iI \
..-...'..,. ,./ li,t.; . i ') : I". I ',.;: "iliili..,'.Y~'..'..""....,"',,:J',_;~:;k, ..~:,.'.' .,or(',
. ::;h{~.r~' 1......... JJ
._ . i I .' . ,I I I I ! 1 I Iii I' 'i : ';.s'
"... "(...... ...:,~
. ' "I,.-r ."0( ..~ '. ,.',t..... f ''l'tt -
. ,""', w..I., I 1 I i 1'"1 I : :::;. 'f.! 1..1 t!t --
I ,. /.. I ,r..,,-,,,~, '. ,.' ,:;! ~~ '."~ 'L:1; -
I. \ .~:. ", ". ~I- '\i ,:.f':"'" -
.......}./, \"'\ ~ ~-i T:.: '~~
I' ;.'... .~T -i! ~
" \'! I." --j .C ,-,
Ii' .' /l . ,,,.
/
I li ./ .. ,'\"'E I . I 'I
I.' 1\\, ~ ;:
\ I; - II
.' T '.' I ,:
I 1\ .!.'" ~t-~
. :1' ~. Ii
I i I"".,. ' "I I ,IT: . ~ - I (-
I ' --j'.- /. \., ':
I'" /~ ~ --01'
I I ..., i. ,\. :..::. __-L__
I \ \: . . f-'-/"J _.' I
I ',."., ':;';' J
... Gl~ ! ...~! i! I I
! . ....., ~ .-.. I
' \ ~ I 1 I I ~I_,
I ~t--~~
1,,-/' i --.
~ I .
I ! 1-1-
. ,
..' I . =: ,:----..1
-,.. :' ,.. I "" ..'...---. ---- '--".'"): -- ct.'. ..i---
I ' .'. I
,) l !tt:E~~i;~\ }\
l~- I II a Ii -.-........r-,
I'--:-'''.:''''!,-~c'_'~~ .:, . ~~ ~.
I I _ __ -_ ........iii;;;;;:::,,_
I ,:: "- .;>. ~
\ ...::.::........
I :: . 0 ~<:.::--..
, 'I I " u.. "-
I l: llirn. -"-
I : I ft. .~..
~~ II IliI~
.M
ON
OJ,
<tea
Ct-
'-"- Z U
N '--.
W
en"')
wO
t-a:
<co.
hi-
ffiz
-JW
-J::E
wW
___'_." 3: ~
><a:
<co.
.,=~ ~ ~
-
.q:
lU
a:
.q:
ffi
m
~
lU
CI)
:I
a:
o
t-
CI)
. '
\,'\
';
U
'I
II
11'
I
: !:l
, I
.
1 !
I
; ii
"1
: I
: I
.1
I
, I
: !
I
, !
" I
, I
I.
I
. "
./.... - 11
,.J. ":'--/r~:'j "~"~I,r" >..
"\.,:.~- "T - ,-::>",~__.1___,
\ '.j i ~
.i "', \.
- r - -- -" -'1 _.--._~.
.. .
.... i
... "
~ \'ij'n..__
.,
..... ~ - . - -~
/--...--- :~...:;,.... .--
"
.
,
,
.
~.
~
; \.&.
~
i i
i
..~\
,
" .... I ..
. ,
-- ------
---- --- -.
-
..
."tr~
'r" "1
j I
- I '
I
__,-.1_
'r-~l
~US w~
<((( I
W<( G)
(91-
<(-
ztt
-z
<(W
~m
,
o
Z
W
(!)
W
...J
CJ)
CJ)<
<w
wa:
0::< I
<z ,,:...J<
zQ ,,:z~ffi
of- z::lwf-
'l= Z <::la: f- <
zwwa:f-<...J
wttl~f-a:...Ja:
t;jof-a:~a:~
oo_w>w>
L1.~W~w
o~~wCJ)wCJ)
~:r:wCJ):::;CJ):::;
:r:ual:::;a::::;a:
g5~8~8~
ofnwCJ)filCJ)o
~CJ)ClClCJ)Cl~
_o<zozo
f-a.. 6 i=a..i=a..
!!10<!!10!!10
xa:a:xa:xa:
w~~la..1 ~~
:il't j i
ii' q t
II t: i
.
I
....
I ~ f-~
<( ~ I~
8 f- I I~
Z w 1&
[I:
~d)O~ ~6~ Hi!!i .
(l)I-Z '1\:<' ~
00.. ~8~ 1")1 ~
0<( (1)<(0>:: li ~
::::s:::: .~ ,!
00: <(~g: ~!! ~
::10 A110 0 0) ~ (l.ji' ,J,
- l.L.I.r ....
.;.....1.&
, .' ....-: " . "~~l" .' \'
, ,., .,.--. I.
AA.~~-'1"':,",
X\
'"
y~
!>
L'
11
,">\ ~~l
'~'~~ '"
....0
'~.; .~.<-/
,,,:~."-,::'~:-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE August 18, 1992
Engineering
#
~OR
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
~5M Public Hearing/92-l8/
il. Jay street
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council has scheduled a public hearing at 7:30 PM for
Project 92-18, Jay Street located in Watt's Garden Acres.
The feasibility report was in your July 21, 1992 City Council
packet. Please bring this report to the meeting as your
reference (please include Pages 4A and Exhibit E from previous
item) .
John Davidson of TKDA will be at the meeting to discuss the
report.
Note: The City has received comments so far from Clearance Wirkus
and Hokanson Development, Inc. (developer of Pheasant
Meadows). See attached.
~-
"
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
'-
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
,
RES. NO.
/
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN,
STREET AND STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION FOR PROJECT NO. 92-18 IN THE
WATT'S GARDEN ACRES (JAY STREET NW)
AREA AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS.
WHEREAS, Resolution No.
the 2nd day of July
hearIng; and
135-92 of the City Council adopted on
, 19~, fixed a date for a public
WHEREAS, pursuant to the required published and mailed notice,
such hearing was held on the 18th day of August
1991 ; and
WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard were given such
opportunity for same; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby order improvement Project No. 92-18.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
, Andover to hereby designate TKDA as the Engineer
) for this improvement and they are directed to prepare plans and
. specifications for such improvements.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
the City Council at a
meeting this
and adopted by
day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution,
and Councilmen
voting against,
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria volk - City Clerk
)
'~
"t]\'
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
"-o-~
August 5, 1992
Re: Feasibility Report (Project 92-18) for the south 1/2 of Jay
street NW located in Watt's Garden Acres
Dear Residents, Property Owners and Developers:
,A feasibility report has been prepared to determine the estimated
cost to improve the south 1/2 of Jay Street NW located in Watt's
Garden Acres for the improvement of sanitary sewer, watermain,
streets and storm drains.
Discussion:
There has been interest from both property owners and developers
as to the location and who will benefit from the improvements on
Jay Street NW.
, , Estimated Cost:
, I
'-...../
( \
'-..J
Included in the report is a detailed estimate of construction
costs for the street and utility improvements. The costs quoted
within the report are estimates only and not guaranteed process.
The total estimated cost is $189,400.00. In addition, in 1989
the City of Coon Rapids levied an area and lateral storm sewer
cost against the City of Andover. The storm sewer and drainage
improvements were provided with the construction of l33rd Avenue
mq. Rates were as follows:
Trunk Storm Sewer
Lateral Storm Sewer
$88l.24/Acre
$2,482.26/Acre
$3,363.60/Acre
TOTAL
Note: Area west of Jay Street was previously assessed. The area
east of Jay Street will be assessed in accordance with the
formula outlined in the feasibility report.
The feasibility report is available for review at City Hall.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or my
assistant, Todd at 755-5100.
Sincerely,
.,;--
es E. Schrantz
ity Engineer/public Works Director
JES:ria
:J ,,(]}....
" ..d.~\.
, "
I
'J
,
I
, ~
CITY of ANDOVER
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 92-18
SOUTH 1/2 OF JAY STREET IN WATT'S GARDEN ACRES
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of
Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota will meet on the Council
Chambers, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW in the City of
Andover, August 18, 1992 at 7:30 PM to consider the making of the
following improvement:
Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Streets and storm Drains
The properties affected are the following:
S 1/2 of Watt's Garden Acres
The estimated cost of such improvement is $189,400.00 plus the
area and lateral storm sewer cost that will be levied to the City
of Andover by the City of Coon Rapids.
Dated:
,f- ~ f ;L
~I&
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
Publication dates: 8-7-92
r:;:\
\UJ
~
'\
, -....J
'\
~
Q2.-/8
Watt's Garden Acres
34 32 24 43 0004
Shamrock Builders
3200 Main Street
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
Jerry Windschitl
3640 - 152nd Lane NW
Andover Mn 55304
34 32 24 43 0003
Commercial Auto Parts
13576 Jay street N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
Tony Emmerich
Tony Emmerich Const.
2619 Coon Rapids Blvd.
Coon Rapids MN 55433
34 32 24 43 0002
Donald and Marion Boeke
13414 Jay Street NW
Andover, MN 55304
Roger Hokanson
Attn: Kirk Corson
9174 Isanti Street NE
Blaine, MN 55434
34 32 24 43 0001
Kurt and Susan Hurst
13440 Jay Street N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
34 32 24 44 0002
Hubert & L.A. Smith
13309 Jay Street NW
Andover, MN 55304
(Inactive account)
34 32 24 44 0003
William and Gloria Hunt
13321 Jay Street N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
34 32 24 44 0004
Milton and M.M. Mardaus
13350 Hanson Boulevard NW
Andover, MN 55304
34 32 24 44 0005
Gerry Wegner
13425 Jay Street NW
Andover, Mn 55304
34 32 24 44 0006
Clarence and Ellen Wirkus
13435 Jay Street NW
Andover, MN 55304
: '\
I
----. /-
(!
~ ;
" '.
\
'--.../
.-
CIT.Y-OF-ANDOVE~
I
I
.!
<J
'-J
,~
H-'" "'-\"....,.-...1....,...'.".-. ",""""'''':0-,,.- l?\oll'">
ru,.: '" '---U' 1'\ I '1- \J -i 1,~1j'i ,,:,- nIl '1'\"
l t'.r~:a~'\.""I . ,'-/::.- ;\-...."-". .]tj.,...' ..1 '1"'-1.
HOKANSON DEVELOPMEN"t INC.
HOKANSON DEVELOPMENt INC.
August 10, 1992
,-~ - C f= ~ V - D
lij t . ~
, I fi
_Jr-- t.
HI "u;; 1 2 lS~
.-
Todd Haas
Andover Engineering Dept.
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW.
Andover, MN. 55304
CITY OF ANDOVER
Re: Improvement of Jay street
As the new owners of the ten acres located at 13414 N.W. Jay street
(Lot 6, Watts Garden Acres Addition), Hokanson Development Inc.
supports the proposal to improve Jay street. We ask that the
assessments for this improvement be disbursed in a ubiquitous
manner.
,
It is our desire to create new lots abutting Jay street once public
improvements are made.
Thank you for considering our request.
srferelY,
~k'nson
9174 Isanti Street N.E., Blaine, Minnesota 55434
(612) 786-3130 Fax (612) 784-9136
@\",',)
.\.r\,,/
'-) ~:~::/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
Discussion Items
ITEM Real Estate Signs
NQ Meadows of Round Lake
DATE August 18, 1992
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT \)
Planning .~
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
BY: BY:
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to review the Special Use Permit request
of Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc. to erect two real estate
signs to be located at 14325 Round Lake Boulevard NW and 14661
Kiowa Street NW. Please consult the attached maps for the
location of the signs.
Each sign will be a thirty two square foot (32 s.f.), two-sided
sign. The sign will advertise lot availability in the Meadows of
Round Lake, a single family residential development.
RECOMMENDATION
'--)
The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their July 28, 1992
meeting, recommended approval of the Special Use Permit as
requested. Attached for Council review are the minutes and the
staff report from the Planning and zoning Commission meeting and a
resolution for Council adoption.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
()
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -92
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF
NEDEGAARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. TO ERECT TWO (2) REAL ESTATE
SIGNS TO BE LOCATED AT 14325 ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD NW (PART OF
GOVERNMENT LOT 4) AND 14661 KIOWA STREET NW (LOT 2, BLOCK 2,
DOSTALER HANE ADDITION.
WHEREAS, Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc. has
requested a Special Use Permit to erect two (2) real estate
signs on the properties located at 14325 ROund Lake Boulevard NW
and 14661 Kiowa Street NW, legally described above; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed
the request and has determined that said request meets the
criteria of Ordinance 8, Sections 5.03, and 8.07; and
,
-)
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the
proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was a
petition submitted citing opposition to the sign located at 14325
Round Lake Boulevard NW; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning and Zoning Commission to allow Nedegaard Construction
Company, Inc. to erect two (2) real estate signs on said property
with the following conditions:
1. The area for development is larger than five (5 a.)
acres.
2. The sign area shall not exceed two hundred square feet
(200 s.f.) in area.
3. The signs shall be located at least one hundred thirty
feet (130') from any residential structures.
,
,
. /
4. An agreement is made to remove the signs within two
years unless an extension of time is granted by the
governing body.
5. The signs shall be located ten (10') feet from
any property line.
, )
Page Two
Special USe Permit - Real Estate Signs
Meadows of Round Lake
August 18, 1992
Adopted by the city Council of the City of Andover on this
18th day of August, 1992
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
,J
'i
" /
(-'
. ,
...J
.,-=-~
,.--.-.,-..... .'
.~
CITY of ANDOVER
Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
July 28, 1992
The regularly scheduled Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting was called to order by Chairperson Bonnie Dehn at 7:34
P.M., Tuesday, July 28, 1992 at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., Andover, MN.
Commissioners Present:
Jonak, Apel, Jovanovich, Pease, Peek,
McMullen
None
Dave Carlberg, City Planner; others
Commissioners Absent:
Also Present:
Approval of Minutes - July 14, 1992
The following corrections were made:
Commissioner Jonak noted that he should only be listed as absent
rather than both absent and present.
Page 2, 1st paragraph, 9th line, Ms. Backer's comment should read
"..she would be happy to work with Andover...".
( ,
,~ Page 3, second line, the word "an" should be removed.
MOTION by Pease, seconded by Jovanovich to approve the minutes of
July 14, 1992 as amended. Motion carried on a 4 yes (Pease,
Jovanovich, Apel, Dehn), 3 absent (Jonak, Peek, McMullen) vote.
*-
Public Hearing - Real Estate Signs - Meadows of Round Lake _
Nedegaard Construction Company
Mr. carlberg explained that this is a request for 2 real estate
signs for the Meadows of Round Lake, being developed by Nedegaard
Construction Company. The locations of the signs will be 14325
Round Lake Boulevard and 14661 Kiowa Street N.W. Ordinances that
apply are Ordinance 8, Section 5.03 which regulates the Special
Use Permit and Ordinance 8, Section 8.07 (D)(2) which lists those
signs allowed by Special Use Permit.
Chairperson Dehn asked if any number of signs could be placed in
a certain vicinity. Mr. Carlberg noted that the ordinance
doesn't address the number of signs.
At this time Chairperson Dehn opened the hearing for public
testimony. '
C \
'\._)
Dan Bonneville, 3608 - l43rd Avenue N.W. - presented a petition
from property owners obJecting to the sign location at 14325
Round Lake Boulevard, stating that because of the increased
volume of traffic on County Road 9 and the large number of
accidents, the people turning left onto l43rd Avenue depend on
the alertness of the people driving behind them. The neighbors
(, ,
~~
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
July 28, 1992
Page 2
(SUP-Nedegaard Const., Cont.)
feel that a distraction created by this sign would compromise
their safety.
Mr. carlberg explained that the sign will be set back from the
property line; it's not going to be right up on the road.
David Newman, Nede aard Construction Com an - noted that to
t e property t ere 1S a e ge and the sign would be
a'little south of the hedge. The owners of the property don't
want the sign in front of their house. He appreciates the
concern about safety. The purpose for putting the sign there is
for directional purposes. The location for the other sign (14661
Kiowa street N.W.) is a vacant lot.
\
~J
Chairperson Dehn asked if there will be homes in the Meadows of
Round Lake in the Parade of Homes, and if so, will there be an
abundance of signs for these homes. Mr. Newman stated that they
are looking at grouping the signs for all of the builders.
Dan Bonneville felt that the sign will distract the people
going north who use the shoulder for passing.
Laura Minnihan, 3740 - l43rd Avenue N.W.- agreed that there is
a safety problem on County Road 9.
Mr. Carlberg noted that the County's concern is that the sign be
out of the right-of-way. Mr. Newman explained that it will be 30
feet from the edge of the road.
Commissioner Dehn asked how valuable that sign is because it's
going to be set back so far. Mr. Newman noted that for
southbound traffic it will be worthless but for those travelling
north, it will give them some idea of where to turn.
Commissioner Peek felt that whether or not the sign is there the
traffic will be. He thought the effect will be the opposite of
what was stated.
Mr. Bonneville recommended that they look for an alternate
10cat10n. '
Commissioner Apel stated that he would rather have people see a
sign then try to second guess where to turn. The property owner
has property rights and the developer has certain rights. He
noted that if we really feel it is a hazard, the request should
, \ be denied; however, he didn't think that is the case.
~~
MOTION by Jovanovich, seconded by Peek to close the public
hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
1
I
~/
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
July 28, 1992 - Minutes
Page 3
(SUP-Nedegaard Const., Cont.)
Chairperson Dehn felt that it is unfortunate that County Road 9
has been neglected. She agrees that it is a situation that is
hazardous but without having some sort of identifiction sign, she
felt it would become more hazardous.
Commissioner Pease felt that the real problem is County Road 9
and perhaps the people in that area should put pressure on the
County to upgrade the road.
( ,
I
,~
Commissoner McMullen suggested moving the sign to the southern
portion of the property. Mr. Newman noted that he considered
that but felt that it would block the visibility of people coming
south on County Road 9.
MOTION by Apel, seconded by Peek that the Andover Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the
Special Use Permit requested by Nedegaard Construction Company
for the 2 real estate signs as indicated. The Commission finds
the request meets the criteria established in Ordinance No.8,
Section 5.03, including 1) the use will not be detrimental to the
health, safety, morals or general welfare of the community; 2)
the use will not depreciate surrounding property; 3) the use is
in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. A discussion was held on
whether it significantly impacts the safety and if it would add
to the congestion. The concensus was that it was a wash.
The Commisson also finds that the request meets the criteria
established in Ordinance 8, Section 8.07. The Commission also
makes the following conditions in accordance with Ordinance 8,
Sections 5.03 and 8.07:
1. The area for development is larger than five acres;
2. Sign area is not over 200 square feet in area;
3. The signs are located at least 130' from any residential
structure;
4. An agreement is made to remove the signs within two years
unless an extension of time is granted by the governing body;
5. The signs shall be located 10' from any property line.
A petition containing 19 signatures was presented citing their
opposition to the sign at 14325 Round Lake Boulevard for what
they believe to be a traffic hazard.
'\ Motion carried on a 5 Yes (Pease, Jonak, Peek, Dehn, Apel), 2 No
,~) (Jovanovich, McMullen) vote.
, ')
'-J
~ 1 ~,. ·
WIJ t;ka ~~
,fJ}y~M'1; ~
~pV/~ ~ t
:t /13 M ti;, ::r;r;-n~
~~ ~I ~~o:1i,
\ ;;r!!htv ~'--R /1' /
Q, ~'1 ~~ i!J
3 ~l~~tuD 6)
, [frV'Wu-t/L
~ \)cu-\~ S~~l+2--
1 Ll ~g g- ~d L.tt k.D g /.. vd--
~ J--o \J ~y- \ ~ ~
- "
I
,-j
;:0.-'
6rMd-~
/'1:1. 7 y Z~ Jf.1'J 'J./, C3
~(1fl". ,(s:1o<f
~J
:,,_..,.
;'" r'j! ,,1/ . ~
\o~t1 vU 0- <<-- L oou)!t '
/ i/lz/g {f Ilzid! {l r SI IU. {u
Iffld ~ /{~/> r4/1J "00 Y
/
11-<1>
---UG.-CU - CC0,-~ -R~}-
\ <-{d-C,C\ L~(")derc\:M 'S+. {)L0
. ) P\0~uV~ .J \~~ SC; 304 GJ
~... \ ~ G. tV ~ ko..\AJ"l e.- ~o JJ I\J ~,,: 1/ e..
3608 I Y""5""'J.. Q.vlf I'JU tv
A4Jdov~ 1"7;J SC:;; 30 L\..
, )
.J
\\~ZJ~ &J
Ictd-.fc (j -ti.;(k ~
av~ 7?z-n... 5,S-::5 oy
/
\ Q 8; (!AU M00Y0
9c9J -1Q801Ju8 J1JuJ.
~I ILIn fE352/ V
(',- \'-\. IV 'CU/ 1
~1t;7J;;:t&fi}uJ
~/ /}vt{, ~~Jol-
,
,
,~
~J
\
\ "
\.....'
--:-J
/ {\/ '
,~,\'b~cL y-~~ \'
j6tJ g /r;c;~ (2ue.;J, uJ.
~) mjt}~3Ji
1') - 'dack- -:. J. .
~-2.~
~5:q.s- 1430f1~tJ0
~/ MI). 55004
C,-)
I'" bR~ ~ s "'- '-'.)10~ ...
I ~ ~l ~ V k0€e (.(",<\14 (9 ,
f\tJ 00\J\z.R fV\N bS ~
427-l1 \qs--
\.
~
~
JUL-06-1992 11:40 FROM CITY OF ANDOVER
r;;;- r~",
_V.
-: Ir;y
~
"
TO
7570649
P.02
~~
OF
I. ~~
ANDOVER
IT. C.,
~
,U/l
"
~ " ~I II)
.... ...
i
.>
.
I
J, ~ IIJJ .
!/ ,
I ('/-.j , a1';J
~ 1
~ (N;)
(/<11 ~
~ .(/1)
~, .~ . ---
~.
(f)
.....
'.1') ~
-
...J
U
. (19) , a::
~
Lt.l
C
(~) Z
=>
'~I M
II"
~
~
t"m.
~
(1-*)
~
(NJ
, (n
~ M
"
l M
N.W.
(5)
~r
:
. ,
, "
,
"
,""
"
~ .
..
OtJl
t'W
"n
I.'; ~ ....~d..
Q
JUL-06-1992 11:40 FROM CITY Of" HNJJUVI:.H - IU ,....,<.Ju~-' -r~<.J";)
~~a...iI~J.}j~~ --..r
, '\
\J
City of Ant(over
. .
~~
E
A
.',
. ,
\'.
\ ~I
"If
.',
, .
....
,...
!J
r"
:.)
,....
.....
North Line of the Southeost Quarter of the Nortllwe:rt Ouarter
of Sec.30,1:-32,R.~24,AnOka County, MiMftota
NSSOIS'IS"E
---609.09---
r-----nz.oQ'- 2 ~fr
., '~J ",I
N Nt
g: 5 ;1
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
67.5
1
I
- I
~
::,.
-~,.., I
..:. ~
g.:!1
-"
i~1
~~I
-;;:
~I
a::.
if
t!.: -5..:1
.....=~
- "
..... "'tc I
~: i.s
U\o. 0""0'
..... U tD
..~~~I
, ~~I
----~1
I
- -::~
~:: I I
;-,. I
...... J I
:.~ I
~.: I
~I
.....
50
_ __ ~:, ~z.Si
12.61--7 - ,
/
,/ /1 I
,/,/~/,/ I I
,'~/,/ / I
'o~'/,// I
~o~,/ ,/ r
~:y 6-~ I
" /-$ ,I
,/ ,/ I
,/ / .,.
...... // /" ~
V / <Ill
~~ ~V,' ~
'\~" ~.> 2' X
\ oe. ~ "1> 0.1
\~'~;
\ >.
\ I 4th I I
~o ~ K. olJl",- st' Nt.J I
~ ~__..ll8ao'2'46C___J
:z
~ - - ISlr.cm---,
2
r- - --Ta6,-ro:- ---..,
I I
I I
I I
I I
10 gl
10 I
I~ 4 ~
I"" "l!
I I
I I
I I
I I
r I
l ' .. I
__Jj~~.::&:___.J
t-
~
L&J
a::J=
....-:;;
(/).~
~
z
r----------,
I /'86,42 I
, I
I J
IQ 81
~ 5 ~
~ ""t
I r
I I
J I
I I
I I
I ,
L_ _ ~8o!t46".t..__..J
r---- --271:60------"1 r-- ------33e.09----
I I I
I ~ I
~ I ....' I
~ ~ ~
''::' ~1~o ~t> * .
J M"lo9ol)-t~ ~ ~
I /~-..'ilQ ~ ~
I I/...t> NaBol~'46"E I I (I)~ C.~49ol
~__ _____~Q&!._____...J ld=-~~~o~~""
I / -~
. "'-
g ~ 146TH LANE N.W. ~l
Ql NSSOl2'46" I
l~-----I~----, \-I69.73--1L>/~
I ':-..... \ \ I R ~ J..~~ '
r ,,4,',. \ \ ~~S1 ~';:-"\
I ' t~dO<5' \ \ o~ -a \
I ',-,,6'.9.;00 \ , .; 0_
I~, \ ,~ "'I. I
1<:0 ~J'... 10 I
0. ~ \0 I
il~ 7 ~ &. I
,IN ~ ~ I I
I \ ':i I
I \ \ rt)i
, \ INJ
I \ \ ~
I , \ -I
L_____N]~lg~6:e:_____J \ :
I r------Z2Z.00------, ~ [
I J 11<) N880,?'4""= ,
I I ....----....-"----....
, : I r---i&J.oo---l
110 I I I
I: 6 ~I I I
I~ <Dr I I
I ~I I r
I I I I
, I I I
I I I.~ ~ I
L____l!.~~Z~6"~____-J 10'::; =....01
/0."... 2 -:01
l~~ ii
I <: <: I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
L.._ !i8~g'~'~_-J
Si
I
I
I
'tIJ
<0:
<O,iO
(\'-'0
-~
rt)o 0
_0 ..,
I en ~
-
I i
J ~
I
l-.l
<:l:
-..! I
il.
..
..
.!
-:: '-I
~ <;
.. "-~I
..c; .... .,_
-:. ~.-
TOTAL P.03
,~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
July 28, 1992
DATE
AGENDA ITEM
3. Public Hearing
Special Use Permit
Real Estate Sign (2
Meadows Round Lake
,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the
Special Use Permit request of Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc.
to erect two (2) real estate signs to be located at 14325 Round
Lake Boulevard NW and 14661 Kiowa Street NW. Please consult the
attached location map.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the Special Use Permit
process.
". --'
Ordinance No.8, Section 8.07 (D)(2) lists those signs allowed
by Special Use Permit. Real estate signs may be allowed provided:
1. The area for development is larger than five (5 a.) acres;
2. Sign area is not over two hundred (200 s.f.) square feet in
area.
3. The sign is located at least one hundred thirty (130') from
any residential structure.
4. An agreement is made to remove the sign within two (2) years
unless an extension of time is granted by the governing body;
after approval of a Special Use Permit has been granted.
In reviewing a Special Use Permit request for any sign certain
criteria shall be used. The criteria of most concern are:
1. No sign shall be permitted that constitutes a hazard to
vehicular safety.
2. No sign shall be permitted that may tend to depreciate nearby
property values, be a detriment to scenic or pleasant views,.
or otherwise mar the landscape.
.~
Page Two
Special Use Permit - Real Estate Signs
Meadows of Round Lake
Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc.
July 28, 1992
COMMISSION OPTIONS
A. The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve the Special Use
Permit requested by Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc. to
erect two (2) real estate signs at 14325 Round Lake
Boulevard NW and 14661 Kiowa Street NW.
The Commission finds the request meets the criteria
established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, including: the
use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or
general welfare of the community; the use will not cause
serious traffic congestions or hazards; the use will not
depreciate surrounding property; and the use is in harmony
with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Commission also finds that the request meets the criteria
established in Ordinance No.8, Section 8.07. The Commission
shall also make the following conditions in accordance with
Sections 8.07 and 5.03.
/ '\
~
1. The area for development is larger than five (5 a.) acres;
2. Sign area is not over two hundred (200 s.f.) square feet in
area.
3. The signs are located at least one hundred thirty (130') from
any residential structure.
4. An agreement is made to remove the signs within two (2) years
unless an extension of time is granted by the governing body;
after approval of a Special Use Permit has been granted.
5. The signs shall be located ten (10') feet from any property
line.
B. The Planning and Zoning Commission may deny the Special
Use Permit requested by Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc.
to erect two (2) real estate signs at 14325 Round Lake
Boulevard NW and 14661 Kiowa Street NW.
The Commission finds the request does not meet the criteria
established in Ordinance No.8, Sections 5.03 and 8.07. In
denying the request, the Commission shall state those reasons
for doing so.
C. The Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item.
,
, )
~
. "
'J
...
,.......=:::;.
/I~'~.
~ '\
, .
\.l. )
',.~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
14325 Round Lake Boulevard
Property Address
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is apporpriate):
Lot
Block
Addi t i on Part of Govt. Lot 4
Plat Parcel PIN 29-32-24-42-0013
(If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal)
*********************************************************************
Reason for Request
Need for a temporary real estate sign in order
to direct people to The Meadows of Round Lake
If - 4- ~u~ Ls.k., k~,
~- z.. ~ ,.o~ sf Lcx:A/-w....
*********************************************************************
Section of Ordinance
P?o7
Current Zoning
Name of Applicant
Nedeqaard Construction Comcany, Inc.
Address
1814 Northdale Blvd., Coon Racids, MN 55448
Home Phone ~ !
Signature I jfl~
Business Phone
757-?,Q?li
Date
,T111 Y q 1 q q ?
*********************************************************************
Property Owner (Fee Owner) Floyd and Lola Sheccard
(If different from above)
Address
14325 Round Lake Blvd.. Andover
427-dOQli
Business Phone
\ Home Phone
o
Signature
Date
+++++++++++++***++++++++++++++++++**********++++++*********+*+*******
"
o
"
~
,
I
'-_/
AGREEMENT TO INSTALL A
REAL ESTATE SIGN
Floyd and Lola Sheppard, the owners of the property located
at 14325 Round Lake Blvd. N.W., Andover, hereby grants
permission to Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc., to install
one Real Estate directional sign of 4 feet by 8 feet in size on
the north end of their property near the intersection of Round
Lake Blvd. and 143rd Avenue. The term of this agreement shall
be for one year and thereafter shall continue on a
month-to-month basis. Provided however that the owners may
terminate this agreement upon 60 days written notice upon their
selling the subject property. Nedegaard Construction Company,
Inc., agrees to pay rent in the amount of $100.00 per month.
It is agreed that Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc., shall be
solely responsible for maintaining this sign in a first class
condition and to maintain it in accordance with Ordinance No.8,
section 8.07 of the City of Andover.
Dated: 'J-'VH..
Nedegaard Construction
Company, Inc.
'/-/ L) - :J.:1...
Dated:
!?y: ~~ p~
~ ts : v.f.
~~~~
F OYd Shep d
,;(~ ~~~
Lola Shep a d
(Sign)
07/13/92-----10:30
14~ I NHn'~C~N I e.l'<::>
-......-
~~
~'
I '\
1 '
\'!:."n.;7/
CITY of ANDOVER
16SS CROSSTOWN eOUl.EVAAO N.W. . ANOOV!!R. MINNESOTA 05304 · (81:2) 7~e,'tOO
.
SPECIAL USE PSRMXT
"
pro~.rty Address
l4661 Kiowa Street Northwest
Legal cescri~tion of ~rope'ty:
(fill in wnichove, 1a apporpriate)t
Lot
3
Block
1
Addition
Do~t41er !fane
flat parcel PIN 30-32-24-24-0004
(If metes and ~ounds, attach ~he ~ompl.t~ Ie9a1j
.**~.****.*********.***.*********.*.*...****.****.**.****...**.......
Raason for ~equest _Need tor a tamporary real estate aiqn in order
to_diract p$ople to The Meadows of Round LAke
'.
\j
Sect10n ot ordinance
c\,\rrent. zoning
********************.**********...****....****......*****.........*..
Na~e of Applicant ~edeqaard Constr~ction Company, Inc.
Addreu
1814 Northdale Blvd.. Coon Ra9id~. MN ~5448
Rome Phon.1~
Signature . ~
.Business phone
751.2926
Oat. JUlv 9, 1992
***...w********************.***w...****...******..****..*.***........
property owner (Fe. Owner) John & Dan1alle Borchert
(!f dlft,rent from above)
Addre$s 14300 - 34th AV9nue North, #302, Plymouth, MN 55447
Si'inature
"-
\
,
j
oate ~-)O-q~
**********************....********************...*****..*
~O.d ~OO.oN 01:LI ~6'~1 [n[
6v90-LSL-~19.0N 131 NOI1Jn~lSNOJ a~~~93a3N
,j
,"
AGREEMENT TO INSTALL A
REAL ESTATE SIGN
John and Daniell. Borchert, the owner~ ot the property located
at 14661 Kiowa StrGGe N.W., Andover, legally Q~ecribed as
Lot 3, BloCk 1, Costaler Hane, hereby 9rants permission to
Nedeqaard construction company, Inc., to install one ~eal E.~at$
directional 819n of 4 teet by 8 teet in size along 7th S.v$~th
Av~nue. The term of thi$ agr..m.nt shall be for ~n$ yea~ and
thereafter shall continue on & rnonth-to-month basi.. p~ovided
however that the owners may terminate this aqreement upon 60
days written notica upon their selling the subject property.
Nedeiaard construction company, Inc., agrees to pay rent in the
~mount a~ ~100.00 par month.
It is agreed that Nedegaard construction companr, Inc., ~hall be
solely responsible for maintaining this .iqn ~n a first clas.
condition and to maintain it in accordance with Ordinance No.9,
Section a.07 of th. city of Andover.
\J Dated: 1)-4.91.
Nedegaard Con.t~uction
Company, Inc.
BY: ~J~.."
its: IJ,P
, '\
(Sign)
, ,
-.-)
~O'd ~OO'ON 01:Ll G6'~1 In[
6v90-LSL-G19'ON l31 NOIIJn~lSNOJ a~~~93a3N
..~~
:o-ml.:l
,......0
=m
:.:af...,l
<n1\J
'"
...0:::>1\J
:;)0':-
CZ
>:>N
, ,
;: c: )
C '~
~O
...
~NI
...
c;.
~
-
-
r.o
,
m 'I :> e ~ ::: '- :0 m m I
~I,'I' z.:-m~ > O~ ~I', ~I'
o 0:::>':-,0 ~~=O 0 0
~ '1')1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ;:: ~ t; ~ ~ I' ~ t
N m ~N Z ON N, N
N :O~~N ~",ZN Nt I\J,
~ Ii ~ :0 ~ 0 (;1 ~ : b : i:
:1 22~ ;:~ ~I ~I
01 Z N e:ON ... ...1
-4 ~ _ e; ~ ~ ~ --/ ~ I y/N Ii
~ ~ ~ ~ m /,,\ ./ \ I~
::: I
.. ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ i:
II.... 1 \,. t;.. it;..;
, J!~ J! , I; r }!:
J _ ,\ ;, J ,___): ___,: ,_,. { ,
- - - - - -. - - - ~ ~, ,-f -..=-=- :=.~---=-- - -=--::.- - - - - - - - - ~-=.=::::=, - ==-=.:- - .- - --=-=-- -= - =,~- -- - .
! > >:0 II >"'111:0 >-4c;:a'I' m >-4I11:a 1.
::~;:""'I ::.........l.~ ,~c....". t-; :::~n\,.!
o ~ 0 o! Q -,j :: U 0:::> C;, l.~ 0 t..; 0 c, ::: e.;;
X~m O~= 0....= xwo
>o:ow <~o~ <~m~ ~ :>~mw
WN m ZN m:>N I\J ~N
"'0 :oxw :a _
.;;::N ~ ~ '-N ~ ON
~.... OQ~ -,jm.... . -,jm.
~C ~> ~~ ~~
=~~ ><r~ =~- - =~~
:>-4 H'" ~W W ~~
r~ ~O >nl >m
:::,0 ~ 0 <~O ~ <~O
me.;; ,u m c ~ m C
z -< \..... t.., ~... rl:"- ... :.: c:.
_ C ..J "'"" _..... L..;..:. r- \"...
~ t;;; ~C;.
"i _
~
>"'0:0
Z.:::w
coo-:oo
OI.HH
<"'cnlri
m-~N
:o~o
H~N
o=~
em
>:aN
VI':-
ZO
lC ZO
o
C::O
mVl
z
Z
~
CI1
~
....
"..
......
VI
vi
o
.
x
::
!
;
..~:o
;"~\.;;i
.' -1 ~
......
~ "; '-...
,N
- I...
... Cr-"",
':J~..
>
:;: C" r,J
:> ....
.;;r
..;rnc
C
~. ...
I.'
,- \
r-~
~
"
r-
/,'
H
::: X:a
~ ,....
, C;, ~ Co
C/)\.,o.i:::
...an,-..
""N
::>
C; '" t..;
.... ~
:0'-
omN
m;o....
c
III 30
~mo
t;..
..;; ~,
o
o
o
o
o
:> ",:0
Z~........,.
o:::>~n~
0""::;
< ""r 1...
m mN
;0 ....:;;;
~ - t.l ':
C'-i~
....:::
:::CN
:.::--
,:>
:':CIlO
C
:::S::l:.
:A: ,..#
""
~
m c:1
:.; c:.; - ,
--
- ::: - 0
c;) ;:;;
,-, IJ1 ....
VI l;l VI >
~ ""
... 0 '-
1..-0 ~
-_.---~------ ._----
v,::J :> n:o > >:0
:--=:\".... ;<;.,,-,, Z~'-'-"
::--mo CO.>O co .::00
;J::J OVlC O~X
;...<;"'" <:C'Jml..o , < ~ ,.w
:>I\J m ;;ON m ....N
.. ;;0'" ;o...m
:"oo;::]N .'-N ~::CN
"".... .::- 0'->. o-:o~
..n .... ~ ....~
:::::N :x:mN :x: N
>~ "l~ '- ~
- ;; , ,
= a 0 Z::CO ZllOO if
0 0 0
,~... Z Qo'" Z;;:JO ,
- - I
I:: ..... ~ ... ~:X:I.H f
..., , 0
m z f
- m a
:> ~ :0: >
Z. Z > Z f:
n Z
-< I VI Z VI
': VI m VI
... '~./'i Vol I.H
C :: C I!
~ ~ I,
I
I.
i-..
<...
c
c
'-
k' :>
~ ~ Z
Z n m
r-
,-, > 1..1
1.1 '-I .....
\'. \'.
a 0
.' ~
-.
-
::
,-,
\,;1
I..
c:.;
~
:to c:o :> <;tI > m:o
~~m\." Z~OVol Z .n'-" n
Q':-ZO o~ZO 0 VlXC
ONX ~N 0 1.1>
<OO~ >"'IIl'-" < N;tI ""
m "TIN ~N m aN
;0 ..... c..'1 ...:0 ;tI .......
':-"'N ~m N . N
-,jm. ....m ~ "">.
.... ....n -;,
=:Z;N =7\:N =......
>-4 m - :01..-0
,:0 ,Z :>m
Z~O Z C <a 0
0 ~O m O!
Zn~ ZHN m.
~ ' ... ~nc.. Z IJ1
go ~ S::110
:>
< m '-
:z ... ~ , :z ,0
Z ~ Z Z -<
~ IlO n
VI H VI VI m
VI VI co VI
"" ~ I.H I.H ~
0 0 c.. 0
~ ~ ~
\
L
c
c
\.....
x
o
c:.;
c:.;
o
t..;
,
i'
>-Z:O
Z~OI.H
CO C':o 0
000
<-,j~~
m-~N
:0 ;tI
ON
-,j~.
~
=m'"
"C~
>c:1
<mC
mZc
me I.
Z ... i:
E ~ - rl
::>: 11
::: I
I,
t:
I;
,
r
l
,
l
r
I,
I
I
I'.
f' '.
I.
f:
i
l
L
C.
I..
Vl
VI
I..
o
....
c
c
c:.;
t;;
c:;
I
I.
L
I.
r
..
L.
L
L
",
~
;...;
1;1
1..1
\..Ii
I..
o
+'
c
c:.;
c
C
l:.
m m > C~
"" I.H Z~OI.,
C 0 I: OI.H-<c.
"'.....CO
I.oi !"oj >0 I.,
N N c:1 r_
...>
N N ':-:Or.
->\; . -,j ~ .'
....
~ ... :X:::>:l-
Vol r,
,ll<>
0 0 !, Z '-
0 0 coc.
- 0 Z~-
~ C> IE: :> r,
'Z
m
~ ~
Z
0 VI
0 VI
0 I.H
0 C
0 .
.'
C C C C {
o
o
o
C
o
l
.._-- ..------- ----- - ----- ------- --+---_..
=-- __-:..~-- __ __ - - __ __ - - - ~ - _. __ - - __ __ __ - - __=--=-=-==== - __-==- ~-=-=- - - - - - - - ___ - - ____ ___ __-...A___
\, \ l' \,'
:::;:.m ::.=::.m ::'-"C:~! ~-"=:e f- m....<m ;:.....=-::e I ;:.....cn;o ;:. 0;;;:; I >-"C}:
C::N I" %:C::N =~m"" %....>N I r~>N ::~;:'N i, 4~0'>.l %I..lCN I' =~C:I
-c C -0 0 -< 0 -0 Q I..l ;0 '<J Q CJ ;0 ~ I "" rol ~1 -0 g 1'01 ::: -0 Q N r ~ 0 0- ;;:: '<ol! C ~. r .
"" '" '" C - GI 0 ~ "O! 0 '" 0 C\ Q 0 ~ OJ '" c; :0.; ! '" .... r
~>~ >o;:.~ c-m~ <~mw ~~m~ comw <'Om~ >~mY >~-<l
n N m N m;ON m ~N H N rn:eN m:eN <N I
~n ~n :C~ :e~ <-or ~~~ ~e~ -H em
~QN ~ON ~~N OON m~>N omN _ N ~rN :::or
c~ C~ eH~ ern~ :C~~~ c:m~ QQ~ ~r~ Oil:-
z ~~ =~ =~ _ m~ ~m m~
~~ oo~ QZ~ m~ O:C~ :c:c~ 0 ~;O:C'
~N ~N ~N W~N c~ nm~ Q~ ~o~
r= rcn ~n r~ rr > r
",,-eo '" c m~ >rne HOO <;:'0 ~:C~
,0 ",",0 Z c:.; "':cO ,." 0 m c.;; ." (
t.: :: ... c:... rn m c m -i ~ .., ." ~ ..~ .... -I ..... l
<;: -..J 0 0 0- (;.; CJ c;.;:: c:.; ... _
~ > o~ en~ ~r ZH
;::;:;1 r ~ :&
:&r <~ n ~
~ rn = Q %z-e ~
~ _ z ~ ~~~ _
m > '...
\..1 \J1 < V1 ~
1",,1 \,,1..... \"'1_
V. ~'.VI ~>
1".0 0 0
o ~ ~
=:>'""
C%N
-ca..o
""
~>I,,<
n N
'll
....
n
aN
c:~
Z
~~
J "
,~):
o
I,,<
N
~,:..
-eN
o
c:;
~
~.
)
'.~
>-OJ:>:l
::~ON
ol,,<e'-O
a 1;0:3:
<V1>1,,<
m %N
:C:>:l
acnN
C:~~
%rn
Q<~
rnN
rz
'" 0
ro
OJ ....
<:> N
%
~
;a;
-
V1
\J1
lJoj
c:..
....
I
i
"
!
o
o
~.
c
"'"
z
VI
VI
1,,0
o
1".0
> :::c
Zt..4mN
0\11:0:1'-0
",'OQ
>\J1;:.1A
..N
.... <-
~>N
I..ln~
:C""
o ~
ll"N
>
<r 0
rn~O
%-"
:ZQCO
IC>
;;
VI
\J1
I..l
C
~
3:
:&""
>
:0:1
H
I
I
I
1
I
i
I
I
I
,
;0 r:o
O....ON
cn....."....g
rn~VI
<~~Y
H":o:I N
r:oo
rC:3N
mC}'.~
c;1~
ra~
rnXN
en::: I
'0 I
:CO
-
ll" V1
Q
o
:0
H
'"
> ::0
ZI..lON
a~n'-O
""N:l:
;:. c. " ~.
:0 N
ClIO
%N
n>~
or
OQ~
% N
."
n 0
""Q<lO
o
0::.....
:0 "
.....
-
-
Z
,
i
Ji
\II
"'1
~
C
~
\J1
0",
lJoj
C
~
r
~
-
\J1
VI
-"
...
\..
"',
0,,1
\.,j
c.;;
~
I
,
I
-----.- ----
-- - ---- .------- ----.-.----.-.- - - --
>....r:o
::~~N
aNCIl'-O
"",""a
;:''O:O~
N
j
I
I
I
I"
I
eCII
Z-1N
Qm~
rn"O
:0=\,.4
nm....
r:::
~ ,0
.".,,0
." ~
~O>
%
C'"
I
I
,
I
I
!
>-r:o:l
Z ~> N j'
ONZ'-OI"
a'OC}
< '0 1",;'
~~~~ 'I:
o m ~ -
~~~ I:
~ iIO -: Ii
H 0
."no i,
~> ~ I
'. :e VI I
~~ I'
>-en;o
Z~nN
ON:::'O
o OJ::
<~;:'I..l
rn ,r N
:o:o~
aNN
c: ..~
:::~
o ... I,,<
3'"
r-o
"'~O
XOi
CJ-<ol,
~ > '0 I:
Ii><
::::&.
ZCO
,J>
:0
r
rn
z
m
!
I;
i
I' '.
t:
>-0
Z~'H
QlAen
ON=
< -00'
rn ."tl
:oc:
- Z~ r
<:1 rn,
rn:>:l
=:0:1'
n-<
r
H~
."
~Q<l
::
;0:
~
:;;:
~
L.
\J1
VI
lJoj
C
~
I,
~~
!
r
Vlrn
-1r
H
:1:ZN
;o:c>
" t:;:
rn
~
I;
I'
II
I.n
\J1
1".0
o
.;-
\.1
\J1
I",;
o
~
i
i
I
I'
VI
V1
I..l
o
~
1./1
...,
1".0
C
~
::
Z
V1
0",
lJo
o
.;-
j'
. .'-_.-- - -- ..- -----
--------------------------------
\
o
I.
= 10m >:::>rt1 >"'Q:O >"'n:o Ii. cr:e i, > == ;:.-"" :0 >-"'z:o i.: > rn n;
CZN Zil:ZN %~mN :z~aN ~ -ON Z C:N b z~rn N z~rnN IlZ~%"tlr
-<0 ..0 a-<o-o 0,-";0'-0 0, o~r-o ....,,-0 ! oor'-O i, ONm -0 :: ONVI'O . a 0.. VI '. ,
;1'; "" "" 0....C'l 1 ""01:Il "0 I..ltll ",om i ",o-z ""o-VI i""oa ~
~ >1,,< >Q>.... <"'rnl..l ;:'01'111".0 > ~~.... >Xc;11..l >'Ornl,,< >1>> I..l '>V1Z>'
en N m N m ::ON :eN e :eN ! >N N ;1 EN I :i: r
~ .... "On :C:o:l :0:1 -1 0 r :;;)0 > c:;c :0> ~. ... rn
-1 ON ~ON 0-1N 0 N !' C:'::N '-0 -;a N 2:0 N a-<N I' ~ VII
C~ C:~ c:...~ c: :o:I~ c;1 ~ ~O~ OOJ ~ c:%~ I,,<
Z Z %3 % > c:1~ mm zm i :e m
-1 ~ ....~ Oo~ Q %~ ro,:. r~ :0:::1 .... Q I..l 0 '-
-< N -< N ....N QN rn:l:N mN n~ ... :0-" l~ >.
r::: r-< enz r r - r > Z
0 0 ""-<0 "" .0 0 I: >0 ...e 0 H ""ll"0 < or
0 0 0 "'0 :co %0 ." 0 0 " I'll l
I,,< lJoj Qll"N OJ -" ... 00 ~Q<l~ CIl%~ i. CIl.
~ .- 0 0 Q ..... Q<l~ 0- ..... Q>~ ! :: >~
;1'; C'l %:;:: ;0 ; IC :0
I,
%> Z Q a:> %-< I; OJ
1C:o:I IC C :t:I i ~ >
:iI: i :iI: ... :iI: 3 = :iI: :iI: C'l I; :iI: ,:/: 1'3 :>:l
% I % % % H Z Z > % '~ ~ ...>
Ii> :c
V1 VI V1 V1 V1 V1 m I V1 11 ~ ~
i VI VI VI VI 3 \J1 VI -1 VI
" ...... .... .... -" ...... ...... rn 1".0 ;, I,,< VI
.J 0 0 0 -" 0 0 0 0 0 e
~ ~ ~ ...... ~ ;~ ~ ~
I
i r-
,
,
,
...--------- ---
i i (' ( (
~:!'
I I
> ~~ > ~~I > ~~ >~n%~
z~nN Z~~N, Z~~N ZN'ZN
g~:~ g~m~1 g~~~ O~O-~I
O~M- O~>. ON~ ~ ~ .,
<~~~ <~~W' <~~~ >m>~w
~~~N ~~~NI ~~~N 3~~Ni
~~N -~>N-~~N >~mNI
N-~ N~~ NO~ M>-~
ZQ Z~ ZZ Z 0
g>~ g"~ g.. ~ '-n~~ I
.. Z ~- IlO ~ . ~ ~ ~ 0 -, N I
~ ' > ~~ ~C....
,'c.;..::.",.,. '... -.. ~: ~ ~ g ~ I ~ ~ g ~: ~ !
,', '. ,.....- ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ I a: : ~ ~ ~ 0>
~ % ~ ~ I ~ i: i~ ~
m ~ I ;;l 1 0
= I ~ ~ ~ ~ I,~ ~ ~ E
~ ~ I.~ \.rj ....
I' i. i
.f~~._~~~;:iijL;:~c~l~~~~~~~~f~~i E~~~f~~~~~~~l?m~~~-~;
o~-t o~~ ~,,~ O~';l ~"~ 1 ~ ~ ~
<~-t~ <~~w ~Q>~ <-~\.rj >Q>...., >Q>1.r< >c
m N m ON m N m ON m N, m N r
~~~ ~~Z ~n ~~~ ~n! 3n
~ON ~ N -tON Q N -tON ~ON
N%~ NO~ C~ C~~ C~ ~~
Z> _> _ ~C ~ ~
O~~ O<~ -t~ v~~ -t~i -t~
C~ ....W ~W mN ~N ~N
~ ~O ~~
Z ~ C ZOO " ~ ~ 0
-0 no 0 ~
=~~ = ~ C ~~~
~ ~ _~~ ~ C ~
. :~'. ':-::
P" . .... ~., ;:-.
.~::::;';~:i~~;.:X~~a:;;~~;~~:i~}~~~~l
. . ,": . ..~::.:.~":'::~'~":~,~<:~~'''-'?:':-:'':':-.: ~.: .;~: "'.::;
~:~;~;l~::~~;~~f,~1ifJJf~&~:~;~;
.. ""." .J .... ...~.. ...~. ~..".~ .__ ,- .- ........
" :&;.HB~~~~'1?ffl~~;~~~'",
", ~/\.~~.~:.: :~'?\., ~:.. :~~~ r": :.'
\
f
'. ..:.: ~ .:' .~~ : . - .'.-
-..:..::-.
.:. -.:. .......~..
-'-.:
"
.'~:~ ';. ._~.~:~~:~;>:t?\~F~~~~:,~->~ ~~~.~?e.:l
-.. . ':;-' ::.;;.~_::..::. '.~~-...: :~":~ - -. ;.'..:;.:'::,~:: :.~., -J
. '. ". '-','
- . ""':",':." . <:.:.-.;~~};~:~~..:-?;/j ;~.:i\':~.~~.~::
'. .,~ .'. ,:--
.-' . ~~-, ;~. .,. ;:: .;~~:;-f.~:~;-::.~ "'.-;::~ :?~.. ;:;~;,
\
,..J
." .-
.-.:.;.-~:./:...~~(.<~.-::..-: . ...:. : "'
V1
V1
W
c::
....
'0
m
c::
::: :.:I -
....
- > ;.:
V1 0 ~
I.n V.
~ \..
a c:::.
~ ~
,
I
~
-<
==
rn
-t
-ol
m
:;:
,\
>O:c~ > ::::0
Zu.....N !: Z\"rl.ImN
O~~~ I CVl~~
oo-~ oom
<~....w <I..oZu.
m >N " m CDN
:a -":i: ~~Xl
"~N ...... N
N .. ,.' IVZ ~
:ZC: :zc:;)
l:7~"" 0 ~
M W< ^ W<
r-> ~m
ZZC Z....o
e -ole
;;:3:V1 Z:~
:c IV ~ -0
QQ ;:0
::
;;
V1
V1
....
C
""
i
'. ~ ,
, > = > m I.:
I. Z ~ Z N
i 0 ~ Oo.Q
~ " ~
> 0 > W i
m N
-e n
-ol 0 N
C ~
\ Z
':-1 ~
~ W<
e i
0
...
w
c::I g<l
:l: > :l: %
Z ~ Z t.. %
c::I >
VI > V1 Z Vl
~ ~ ~ m ~
..... > ..,. -t W<
C e 0
~ ~ .. ..,.
->:>m
ZCZN
o~o~
~ ,,~
>l:7>W
"' .., N
~n
-tON
..c~
Z
~~
-<N
3:
~
...
:c
-
....
-.:
::
;.:
1..,
v,
V.
o
~
1..,
1..,
1..0
o
W
i.
I,
I
i'
i
!
i
!
i
i
\
>"'-1::0 f>v.n::;:"T1
Z~~N ,ZN.....ZN
CNm~ ',o~o . ~
Oo-~ ,~ ~
<~lil"'" i >m>-tw
m mN Z>N
~~~ ::;:o-ol
0 ~..I '>~m N
cr-~ ....:> ~
%0 Z 0
CXl~ n~ ~
:.:I..... tnO N
~> ~CM
~....e ZZO
ZO -t 0
c::I me ~-t~
0 N ;;O~
CD >c:
% , C~
:c I l:I~
:l: i :0: ....
Z Z -t
I 0
Vl I VI ~
Vl i Vl
..,. W<
0 e
.. ..,.
>:>m
Z~ZN
o-<o~
~.. ~
>o>w
m N
~n
~ON
C~
Z
-t~
-<N
>:
z~
0-
~
>c
.. ~
o !I
~i
NI
I
I
o
o
v.
~
:l:
OJ:;
....
;;:;
~
~
1..0
c:.
I..
0 0
0 c.J
~ ~
\.. C
-
"' ;..
vl \.1
IJ1 1...
1.<. 1..0
c:. c....
I,..j I,..j
>=>m
ZCZN
O~O-O
~ ~
>0>,,",
m N
-en
-tON
c..
Z
-t..
-< r..l
>:
ZI
O.
~
> ~
r
o
e
~
~
:z:
Z
:z:
%
VI
IJ1
....
o
......
V1
IJ1
......
o
I,..j
o
/r~'"~'~"">"'\
'\JJ \
\.1.. )
',,-" '"
"?~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, July 28, 1992 at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the Special Use Permit
request of Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc. to allow for the
placement of two (2) real estate signs as defined in Ordinance No.
8, Section 8.07 located at 14661 Kiowa Street NW (Lot 3, Block 1,
Dostaler Hane Addition) and 14325 Round Lake Boulevard NW (part of
Government Lot 4).
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
A copy of the application and location will be available at
~ Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
~!-u;~, ia
Vlctorla Volk, City Clerk
publication dates: July 17, 1992
July 24, 1992
/ \
'-...-/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
~T5MArea I.D. Signs (2)
, Meadows of Rd. Lake
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT D
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
BY: Ci ty Planner
August 18, 1992
REQUEST
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Items
The city Council is asked to review the Special Use Permit request
of Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc. to construct two (2) "Area
Identification" signs (permanent monument) on lot 1, Block 1 and
Lot 39, Block 5, The Meadows of Round Lake.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their July 28, 1992 meeting,
reviewed the request and recommends to the City Council that the
request of Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc. be granted for the
construction of one area identification sign to be located at Lot
39, Block 5, The Meadows of Round Lake. The Commission also added
that in the event the City Council approves the amendments to
Ordinance No.8 and Ordinance No. 10 at the August 4, 1992 meeting
the Andover Review Committee make a recommendation to the City
Council on the second sign requested.
ANDOVER REVIEW COMMITTEE REVIEW
The Andover Review Committee met on August 11, 1992 to discuss the
additional sign requested by Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc.
to be located at Lot 1, Block 1, The Meadows of Round Lake. The
ARC recommends to the City Council that the applicant be granted
the Special Use Permit for the additional sign. The
recommendation for approval was based on the size of the
development (84 acres, 161 lots), number of entrances to the
development (2), and the location of the signs.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'-
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
, ,
~
RES. NO. R
-92
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF
NEDEGAARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. TO ERECT TWO (2) AREA
IDENTIFICATION SIGNS ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1 AND LOT 39, BLOCK 5, THE
MEADOWS OF ROUND LAKE.
WHEREAS, Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc. has
requested a Special Use Permit to erect two (2) area
identification signs on Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 39, Block 5, The
Meadows of Round Lake; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission has reviewed
the request and has determined that said request meets the
criteria of Ordinance 8, Sections 5.03, and 8.07; and
,
~~
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission finds the
proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was one
comment from a neighbor who wanted to make sure the sign was
appropriate; and
WHEREAS, the Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed
the request for the second sign; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission and Andover
Review Committee recommends to the City Council approval of the
Special Use Permit requested for the two (2) area identification
signs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning and zoning Commission and the Andover Review Committee to
allow Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc. to erect two (2) area
identification signs on said property with the following
conditions:
1. The area for development is larger than five (5 a.)
acres.
2. The maximum square footage of each sign shall not
exceed thirty-two (32') square feet in area.
3. The sign shall be located ten (10') feet from any
property line.
4. The Special Use Permit will be subject:,to annual
review and site inspection by Staff.
\
, )
, "
,
'- ./ Page Two
Special Use Permit - Area Identification Signs
The Meadows of Round Lake
Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc.
August 18, 1992
5. The applicant shall execute a written agreement with
the City for the maintenance of the signs.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
18th day of August, 1992
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
,
-.J
"
)
(' ~
~~
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
July 28, 1992 - Minutes
Page 4
~public Hearing - Special Use Permit - Area I.D. Signs - Meadows
~/\of Round Lake
Mr. Carlberg explained that the request is for two permanent
monument signs to be constructed at the entrances of the Meadows
of Round Lake. One sign will be at Lot 1, Block 1 and the other
at Lot 39, Block 5. The current ordinance allows only one sign
per development. If the amendments to Ordinance 8 and 10 are
approved, they would be able to negotiate for the additional
sign.
Commissioner Apel noted that this request is identical to the
request of Continental Development that was heard at the last
meeting.
Chairperson Dehn questioned whether Nedegaard would request an
I ~ ~ additional sign if the entrance off County 116 becomes a reality.
'~ Mr. Carlberg stated they would have to apply for an Amended
Special Use Permit.
Commissioner Peek asked if the applicant wishes for the request
to be for two signs. Mr Newman stated yes as they would not want
to have this item tabled. They would like to have everything
ready for the Parade of Homes which starts on September 12.
Chairperson Dehn opened the public hearing.
Mr., Newman explained that the signs are currently being designed
by a graphic designer. The signs will be sandblasted which tends
to be maintenance free. There will also be landscaping involved.
They will be creating a homeowner's association in the plat and
that association will have the right to maintain the signs. If
the entrance on County 116 is approved they will want a sign at
that entrance also.
Tom Minnihan - 3740 - 143rd Avenue N.W. stated that he doesn't
want th1s sign to be in his neighborhood.
MOTION by Pease, seconded by Jovanovich to close the public
hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
1
~/
MOTION by Apel, seconded by McMullen that the Andover Planning
and zoning Commmission recommend to the City Council approval of
the Special Use Permit requested by Nedegaard Construction
Company, Inc. to erect one (1) area identification sign
(permanent monument sign) in the Meadows of Round Lake. The
Commission finds the request meets the criteria established in
( ,
, I
'.-./
1.
2.
3.
4 .
5.
') 6.
, /
7.
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
July 28, 1992 - Minutes
Page 5
(SUP-Nedegaard, Cont.)
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 including: the use will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of
the community~ the use will not cause serious traffic congestion
or hazards~ the use will not depreciate surrounding property~ and
the use is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Commission also finds that the request meets the criteria
established in Ordinance 8, Section 8.07. The Commission also
makes the following conditions in accordance with Sections 8.07
and 5.03:
The area for development is larger than 5 acres~
There shall be only 1 sign per development~
The maximum square footage of the sign is 32 square feet in
area~
The sign is located ten feet from any property line~
The Special use Permit shall be subject to annual review by
staff~
The applicant shall execute a written agreement with the City
for the maintenance of the sign.
That in the event the Council approves the changes in
Ordinance 8 and Ordinance 10, that the developer should meet
with the Andover Review Committee to determine any other
signage and the Review Committee will make a recommendation
to be forwarded to the City Council.
8. There was one comment from a neighbor who wanted to make sure
the sign was appropriate.
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Apel,'seconded by Pease to change approval of Andover
Review Committee in the motion from July 14, 1992 to
recommendation of the Andover Review Committee to be forwarded to
the City Council. Motion carried.
Public Hearing - Area Identification Sign - Weybridge
Mr. Carlberg explained that this is a request for a Special Use
Permit for a permanent monument sign to be located at the
entrance of the Weybridge plat. The sign will be located at
14458 Xeon Street.
Commissioner Jonak asked how many acres this request is for. ~
Windschitl stated that it is for 148 lots. Mr. Jonak wanted to
make sure that it is for the entire plat and not just one phase
\ of the plat.
'. ./
Chairperson Dehn opened the public hearing. No one appeared to
give testimony.
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUESTF,OR PLANNING COMMISSION AcnON
July 28, 1992
AGENDA ITEM
4. Public Hearing
Special Use Permit
Area Id. Sign (2)
Meadows Round Lake
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
BY:
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BV'~
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review the
Special Use Permit request of Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc.
to erect two (2) "Area Identification" signs (permanent monument)
to be located at the entrances of the Meadows of Round Lake Plat.
The signs will be located on Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 39, Block 5,
the Meadows of ROund Lake. Please consult the attached location
map.
Note: the Commission should consider the proposed amendments to
Ordinance No.8, Section 8.07 reviewed at the last Planning
Commission meeting. The request in this report will be written
and reviewed according to ordinances on record.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
'-.-J
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the Special Use Permit
process.
Ordinance No.8, Section 8.07 (D)(2) lists those signs allowed
by Special Use Permit. An area identification sign may be allowed
provided:
1. The area for development is larger than five (5 a.) acres;
2. There shall be only one (1) sign per development;
3. The maximum square footage of the sign is thirty-two square
feet (32 s.f.) in area;
4. The sign is located ten feet (10') from any property line.
In reviewing a Special Use Permit request for any sign certain
criteria shall be used. The criteria of most concern are:
1. No sign shall be permitted that constitutes a hazard to
vehicular safety.
2. No sign shall be permitted that may tend to depreciate nearby
property values, be a detriment to scenic or plea~ant views,
or otherwise mar the landscape.
'-.-)
GENERAL REVIEW
The applicant is requesting the Special Use Permit to erect two
(2) permanent monument area identification signs for "The
o
Page Two
Special Use Permit - Area Identification Signs
The Meadows of Round Lake
Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc.
July 28, 1992
Meadows of Round Lake", a single family residential development.
COMMISSION OPTIONS
A. The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve the Special Use
Permit requested by Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc. to
erect two (2) Area Identification signs (permanent monument
signs) on Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 39, Block 5, the Meadows of
Round Lake.
~
The Commission finds the request meets the criteria
established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, including: the
use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or
general welfare of the community; the use will not cause
serious traffic congestions or hazards; the use will not
depreciate surrounding property; and the use is in harmony
with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Commission also finds that the request meets the criteria
established in Ordinance No.8, Section 8.07. The Commission
shall also make the following conditions in accordance with
Sections 8.07 and 5.03.
1. The area for development is larger than five (5 a.) acres;
2. There shall be only one (1) sign per development;
3. The maximum square footage of the sign is thirty-two
square feet (32 s.f.) in area;
4. The sign is located ten feet (10') from any property line;
5. The Special Use Permit shall be subject to annual review
by Staff.
6. The applicant shall execute a written agreement with the
City for the maintenance of the signs.
B. The Planning and zoning Commission may deny the Special Use
Permit requested by Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc. to
erect two (2) Area Identification signs (permanent monument
signs) on Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 39, Block 5, the Meadows of
Round Lake.
The Commission finds the request does not meet ,the criteria
established in Ordinance No.8, Sections 5.03 and 8.07. In
denying the request, the Commission shall state those reasons
for doing so.
, \
~ C. The Planning and zoning Commission may table the item.
~J
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
Property Address
4163 - l47th Ave. NW and 3810 - l43rd Ave NW
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is apporpriate):
Lot 3~ Block ~ Addition The Meadows of Round Lake
Plat Parcel PIN
(If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal)
*********************************************************************
Reason for Request This is a request for two Area Identification
Signs. One to be located at each of the two entrances to The
Meadows of Round Lake.
:J
Section of Ordinance
9.01
Current Zoning
Residential ~-1-
*********************************************************************
Name of Applicant
Nedeqaard Construction Comoanv, Inc.
Address
1814 Northdale Boulevard, Coon Rapids, MN 55448
Home Phone~
Signature ~
Business Phone
757-2926
Date
Julv 9, 1992
*********************************************************************
property Owner (Fee Owner) SAME AS ABOVE
(If different from above)
Address
\.
'J
Home Phone
Business Phone
Signature
Date
.....*....**.**........***.**********...*....***......*.**********.*.
s~~
("
-:)
,
':l:l
o
c:.
'%.
'=>
~
...
.,.,
"'
l"
, :c
:u
,-
"1
....
'-'i
I,
'"
.:
,~
",l
f
~
I,'
','",
,:"
--z= I
-fo- I
,.I-~ .
...---...... .
, ,
,
'~I..J
I,
,..
<-
.".'
'"
".'=-
~
'"
7'1--
.'
. ,
L.__
~ I
a
~
n
~'I~
n
l
'1
l
'"
"
t'
't
~,
-.
t."
.::
,:,
,.
..... . I ".I '.,"
.''''''1'' .....
"
'1 '1II'l'I'I'1
III"I'W,,,,
" 11111'1(1
I! I ,,,,,,,.j
I' "1111'1
! ' ,!/I.
I ,:'1'
,.!.,
[. ,
I
11" I''''
~~ 1!1I1
,., ~I '
I, '
il
"
'r.
..",.n
....- ....
.........
.'.'., .""
........... .:...,
"-
"
,
'.
\,
\
.-
'\
\
J
. ,
,.-J
~~O'd 800'ON 61:9116'81 nON
';'
f
-l
~
rtl
!!B:
~ ::r'1
= IICJ~N
t ~
~~;
;(f):
, '.~
n 1:0
:0
oC
H5
r
~
;;>r;
ITl
(,
6P90-lSl=ZI9'ON 131 NOI1Jn~1SNOJ
i
I
'I
.!
, ,
, i
\.J;'
!
i
I
I
l
, , Ii
01-
,0
I IU JI
.f~, III I
..II I
~II I
t Ii',
qu
r'il i
r r I
II ,I
u .f
r-
o
..
~
'"
0'
n
,..
,.
,II
I
~
:i!
'"
~
8
z:
VI
o
..,
'"
o
c
:z
o
,{T1
r-
D
o
.::0
J:,.
D
()
I
,
r-
. 0
ru .
N F
()I ~
6' \
I
/
!;:
7<
'"
~
~
f'1
f
'"
r;,i
~
i:
~
....
~
M
~
Z
-1
'1
'I f
I
1
,1
I
.~
, "
.J
10
.
"
~'
:0
,lJ , ;
~
N
fJ
~ .
,
!!
b"ae~~J~:;!a~~~
::~~g~~;~~~~re
, X:::J ~-a :],(11 "'" VI
.. .. :::1il ::: 8;l '< ~ ~ ~
~mfi.a~x: ui.::J.
;!.l.no~'E:V)~ ~~r+
'<........o.roO OfO....
fO _'V1"'T1r- _....,0
n I'D en n ri 0 _.....,
Or+o.CfO::ort 0
~ l'T1a:;:!.g_ ~.g S
to At ...., '< ;z:. :::t a..::J
""~br+oom .lQ~5
o rtO-f)r- 0. ~
""'tIO >0 III a.::J
"'~iQl,...n V1::Jrt
VI.. tTl;Jllf" n a..Dl
DIrt - ....,-
_.~ - - -
CLfO ::J.. 0""
-,C'D fO
a.
'.zp
:z
"'.
o '
'"
~
'"
o
n
o
:z
VI
;j
c
n
...
o
:z
::r:
, ~
, I!l ~ tj
;,~I3~Vl
, ;' J ~ i ~
'I~i p ~'
~I ~
~
.
II td~ DO
; I i f I J..I ~II ~s~
i if! J i i ip ~ ~
I :!I :!I !!! !i' . f g~,[
~ ~ J j' i i ~:,
"
I
!
3/1 o-a-. ~I 00 N
_ .00' sOG -'.
...., - "
i' )
.
,....;- , l '
.,.. L..J
, I "
'.j
....
..-..- .
,,">
., ".,
<. t
-I
...
..:rO
-
,
..
~ . ...-
. '
,
o'il
.
,
.
.
.
~ w .
. -
.r d:> i
~~. 1O ,~
· ZlS\ - r:
lOr---
~:cttD
, 0 .,...
: tJ ~
.<D
f/)
I
.
,
.
.
.
(b6 '0as fZ iC
-' .
..
-
-{.. <0" 0 0 - ~ b . ~ . '.
~ N . "
~-oCJ. ~~\ - -\ 0 d\ ~
-o-~ (1) ~'
-i' ...,- 1'0\ ~ '
\~ ~-~---\.-~~
; ,
Lt'~~.~~~s./ ...... -
'r':-'-o~~;-:~' ....~ :
\{O (X) \ _1" OJ
\ r' rO I <r. tri I!'I
\ei> ;~d)i
L~~~<'~~~~ ./...... ~
\
~
.
,
: 'r:.-:_- \~'i"il-l..-."'"
/ 0'
I 0 I 0
.. 1._.1\
.
.
I
, ,
v
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.w. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, July 28, 1992 at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the Special Use Permit
request of Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc. to allow for the
erectiori of two (2) "Area Identification" signs (monuments) as
defined in Ordinance No.8, Section 8.07 located at Lot 1, Block
1 (4163 l47th Avenue NW) and Lot 39, Block 5 (3810 143rd Avenue
NW), The Meadows of Round Lake.
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
) A copy of the application and location will be available at
'~ Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
4U
Victorla Volk, city Clerk
Publication dates: July 17, 1992
July 24, 1992
, ,,../
29 32 24 31 0069
Rosella Sonsteby
4151 - l41st Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
=:)2 24 31 0072
Courtney & Mary Lou Kuch
14298 Woodbine st NW
Andover, MN 55304
29 32 24 31 0067
Dennis Reinhardt
14279 Woodbine st NW
Andover, MN 55304
29 32 24 31 0073
steven Sonsteby
3755 - l43rd Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
29 32 24 32 0005
Joel & Kristine Blake
14332 Xenia st NW
Andover, MN 55304
2" ,32 24 32 0008
L, ~ence & Bonnie Hirdler
14308 Xenia St NW
Andover, MN 55304
file: Meadowrealsign143
, '\
V
29 32 24 31 0070
Rosella Sonsteby
4151 - 141st Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
29 32 24 31 0065
Richard Johnson
3740 l43rd Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
29 32 24 31 0064
Melvin & Ester Niska
3737 - 143rd Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
29 32 24 31 0074
Eugene & Colleen Gibson
14319 Xenia st NW
Andover, MN 55304
29 32 24 32 0006
Andrew Davis
14324 Xenia st NW
Andover, MN 55304
29 32 24 32 0010
City Park
29 32 24 31 0071
Rosella Sonsteby
4151 - l41st Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
29 32 24 31 0066
Harry & Ruth Moberg
14289 Woodbine St NW
Andover, MN 55304
29 32 24 31 0063
Mike & Nancy Nolan
14318 Woodbine st NW
Andover, MN 55304
29 32 24 31 0075
Sandra Torgerson
14329 Xenia st NW
Andover, MN 55304
29 32 24 32 0007
Bob & Lori Fox
14316 Xenia st Nw
Andover, MN 55304
29 32 24 32 0002
Rosella Sonsteby
4151 - 141st Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
30 32 24 11 0015
Occupant
14745 Guarani st NW
Andover, MN 55304
, "-
~. )2 24 11 0008
Gary & Dorothy Heglund
4175 - 147th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
30 32 24 13 0039
Jim & Colleen Haase
14651 Guarani st NW
Andover, MN 55304
: )
f~le: meadowsrealsign147
:.J
30 32 24 11 0009
Allen Wicklund
4180 - 147th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
30 32 24 11 0010
Peter Raun
4110 - 147th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
30 32 24 13 0037
Larry & Wanda Beckman
14683 Guarani st NW
Andover, MN 55304
30 32 24 13 0038
Stephen & Cora Allyn
14650 Guarani st NW
Andover, MN 55304
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
,
/
DATE
August 18; 1992
,
I
/
~5M Special Use Permit
~ Area ~.D. Sign
BY:
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to review the Special Use Permit request
of Ashford Development Corporation, Inc. to construct an "Area
Identification" sign (permanent monument) on lot 1, Block 1,
Weybridge. The property is located at 14485 Xeon Street NW.
BACKGROUND
\-.-
Ordinance No.8, Section 8.07(D)(2) allows one area identification
sign by the granting of a Special Use permit provided:
1. The area for development is larger than five acres.
2. The maximum square footage of the sign is thirty-two square
feet in area.
3. The sign is located ten feet from any property line.
Additional signs requested are required to be reviewed by the
Andover Review Committee (ARC) and the Planning and Zoning
Commission and approved by the City Council.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their July 28, 1992 meeting,
reviewed the request and recommends to the City Council that the
request of Ashford Development Corporation, Inc. be granted.
Conditions to the Special Use Permit are indicated on the attached
resolution. The Commission was most concerned that the request
for the sign be for the whole (148 lot) plat known as "Weybridge"
and not just one phase of the plat. Attached for Council review
are the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
SECOND BY
~fO
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
, \
~
RES. NO. R
-92
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF ASHFORD
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC. TO ERECT AN AREA IDENTIFICATION SIGN
ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14485 XEON STREET NW, LEGALLY DESCRIBED
AS LOT 1, BLOCK 1, WEYBRIDGE.
WHEREAS, Ashford Development corporation, Inc. has
requested a Special Use Permit to erect an area identification
sign (permanent monument) on the property located at 14485 Xeon
Street NW, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, weybridge; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission has reviewed
the request and has determined that said request meets the
criteria of Ordinance 8, Sections 5.03, and 8.07; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the
proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no
opposition regarding said request; and
\
'..J
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning and zoning Commission to allow Ashford Development
Corporation to erect an area identification sign on said property
with the following conditions:
1. The area for development is larger than five (5 a.)
acres.
2. There shall be only one sign per development.
Additional signs shall be reviewed by the Andover
Review Committee and the Planning and zoning
Commission and approved by the City Council.
3. The maximum square footage of the sign is thirty-two
(32 s.f.) square feet.
4. The sign shall be located ten (10') feet from any
property line.
5. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual
review by Staff.
~J
.' ,
,~ Page Two
Special Use Permit - Area Identification Sign
weybridge
Ashford Development Corporation, Inc.
August 18, 1992
6. The applicant shall execute a written agreement with
the city for the maintenance of the sign.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
18th day of August, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
victoria Volk, City Clerk
,
, j
"
, )
., ./J
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
'\
, .J 7.
Planning & zoning Commission Meeting
July 28, 1992 - Minutes
Page 5
(SUP-Nedegaard, Cont.)
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 including: the use will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of
the community; the use will not cause serious traffic congestion
or hazards; the use will not depreciate surrounding property; and
the use is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Commission also finds that the request meets the criteria
established in Ordinance 8, Section 8.07. The Commission also
makes the following conditions in accordance with Sections 8.07
and 5.03:
The area for development is larger than 5 acres;
There shall be only 1 sign per development;
The maximum square footage of the sign is 32 square feet in
area;
The sign is located ten feet from any property line;
The Special use Permit shall be subject to annual review by
staff;
The applicant shall execute a written agreement with the City
for the maintenance of the sign.
That in the event the Council approves the changes in
Ordinance 8 and Ordinance 10, that the developer should meet
with the Andover Review Committee to determine any other
signage and the Review Committee will make a recommendation
to be forwarded to the City Council.
8. There was one comment from a neighbor who wanted to make sure
the sign was appropriate.
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Apel, seconded by Pease to change approval of Andover
Review Committee in the motion from July 14, 1992 to
recommendation of the Andover Review Committee to be forwarded to
the City Council. Motion carried.
~ Public Hearing - Area Identification Sign - Weybridge
Mr. Carlberg explained that this is a request for a Special Use
Permit for a permanent monument sign to be located at the
entrance of the Weybridge plat. The sign will be located at
14458 Xeon Street.
Commissioner Jonak asked how many acres this request is for. ~
Windschitl stated that it is for 148 lots. Mr. Jonak wanted to
make sure that it is for the entire plat and not just one phase
, of the plat.
'. .J
Chairperson Dehn opened the public hearing. No one appeared to
give testimony.
\
,~
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
July 28, 1992 - Minutes
Page 6
(SUP-Weybridge, Cont.)
MOTION by Apel, seconded by Pease to close the public hearing.
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Peek, seconded by Pease that the Andover Planning and
Zoning Commmission recommend to the City Council approval of the
Special Use Permit requested by Ashford Development Corporation
to erect an area identification sign on Lot 1, Block 1,
Weybridge.
,
I
, /
The Commission finds the request meets the criteria established
in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, including: the use will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of
the community; the use will not cause serious traffic congestion
or hazards; the use will not depreciate surrounding property; and
the use is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Commission also finds that the request meets the criteria
established in Ordinance 8, Section 8.07. The Commission shall
also make the following conditions in accordance with Sections
8.07 and 5.03:
1. The area for development is larger than five acres;
2. There shall be only one sign per development;
3. The maximum square footage of the sign is 32 square feet in
area;
4. The sign is located ten feet from any property line;
5. The Special Use Permit shall be subject to annual review by
staff;
6. The applicant shall execute a written agreement with the city
for the maintenance of the sign;
7. A public hearing was held and no comments were received.
Motion carried unanimously.
Variance - Deck Encroaching Into Sideyard Setback - 1332 l37th
Lane - Susan Ham
Mr. Carlberg explained that this request is to allow for the
construction and placement of a deck encroaching into the
required 10 foot sideyard setback from an interior lot line on
the property located at 1332 - 137th Lane N.W. He noted that the
applicant purchased a model home believing they could construct a
deck as a sliding glass door exists six and one-half feet above
ground level where the deck is to be located. He stated that
this is a case of a house being too big for the lot.
\
~/ Chairperson Dehn asked if there is a fence or a hedge on that
side of the house on the property line. Susan Ham stated that
there is nothing between the two houses.
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
July 28, 1992
AGENDA ITEM "
5. Public Hearing
Special Use Permit
Area Id. Sign
Weybridge
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the
Special Use Permit request of Ashford Development Corporation,
Inc. to erect an "Area Identification" sign (permanent monument)
to be located at the entrance of the Weybridge Plat. The sign
will be located at 14485 Xeon Street NW (Lot 1, Block 1,
Weybridge). Please consult the attached location map.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the Special Use Permit
process.
Ordinance No.8, Section 8.07 (0)(2) lists those signs allowed
by Special Use Permit. An area identification sign may be allowed
, provided:
'--./
1. The area for development is larger than five (5 a.) acres;
2. There shall be only one (1) sign per development;
3. The maximum square footage of the sign is thirty-two square
feet (32 s.f.) in area;
4. The sign is located ten feet (10') from any property line.
In reviewing a Special Use Permit request for any sign certain
criteria shall be used. The criteria of most concern are:
1. No sign shall be permitted that constitutes a hazard to
vehicular safety.
2. No sign shall be permitted that may tend to depreciate nearby
property values, be a detriment to scenic or pleasant views,
or otherwise mar the landscape.
GENERAL REVIEW
The applicant is requesting the Special Use Permit to erect a
permanent monument area identification sign for "Weybridge",
,~
~J
Page Two
Special Use Permit - Area Identification Sign
Weybridge
Ashford Development Corporation, Inc.
July 28, 1992
,"
,
a single family residential development.
COMMISSION OPTIONS
A. The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve the Special Use
Permit requested by Ashford Development Corporation, Inc',to
erect an Area Identification sign (permanent monument sign) on
Lot 1, Block 1, Weybridge.
The Commission finds the request meets the criteria
established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, including: the
use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or
general welfare of the community; the use will not cause
serious traffic congestions or hazards; the use will not
depreciate surrounding property; and the use is in harmony
with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Commission also finds that the request meets the criteria
established in Ordinance No.8, Section 8.07. The Commission
shall also make the following conditions in accordance with
Sections 8.07 and 5.03. '
, 1.
~) 2 .
3 .
The area for development is larger than five (5 a.) acres;
There shall be only one (1) sign per development;
The maximum square footage of the sign is thirty-two
square feet (32 s.f.) in area;
4. The sign is located ten feet (10') from any property line;
5. The Special Use Permit shall be subject to annual review
by Staff.
6. The applicant shall execute a written agreement with the
City for the maintenance of the signs.
B. The Planning and Zoning Commission may deny the Special Use
Permit requested by Ashford Development Corporation, Inc. to
erect an Area Identification sign (permanent monument sign) on
Lot 1, Block 1, Weybridge.
The Commission finds the request does not meet the criteria
established in Ordinance No.8, Sections 5.03 and 8.07. In
denying the request, the Commission shall state those reasons
for doing so.
C. The Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item.
~J
:J
~
~
.,~~~.....
r(j\\
\!Y
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
property Address 14485 Xeon ST NW, Andover (Lot 1, Block 1, Weybridqe)
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is apporpriate):
Lot
Block 1
1
Addition Wevbridge
plat Parcel PIN
(If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal)
*********************************************************************
Reason for Request
Sign for new subdivision-Weybridqe
Section of Ordinance 8.0'7
,e --1-
Current Zoning
*********************************************************************
Name of Applicant Jerry Windschitl Ashford Development Corporation. Inc.
Address 3640 152nd Lane NW Andover, MN 55304
Home Phone A?7-9217 , BU:7;1sS ~hone
Signature '~A.:/ ~)'^^ L"..~^l,/ _. Date 7-02-1992
/.. 6 ..
*********************************************************************
Property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address
Home Phone
, ~Business Phone
>2~j (f\) 'MjL, L
Date
'7- ~- 12
Signature
*********************************************************************
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PAGE 2
\
",J
The following information shall be submitted prior to review by the
City of Andover:
1. A scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks;
adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures
wi thin 100 feet.
"
,
2. The names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet
of the subject property.
Application Fees:
Commercial
Residential
Amended SUP
Recording Fee
$190.00
$150.00
$ 50.00
$ 15.00
Date Paid "7-cb1-<,bS
Receipt It 4~7
'~
~
Rev. 1-07-92:d'A
Res. 179-91 {11-05-9l)
CRITERIA FOR GRANTING SPECIAL USE PERMITS
In granting a Special Use Permit, the City Council shall consider the
advice and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and:
1. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals
and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
2. Existing and anticipnted traffic conditions including parking
facilities on adjacent streets and lands.
3. The effect on values of property and scenic views i~ the
surrounding area.
4. The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan.
, \
",- -)
" ,- - - - -, r ~ - -
98 ' 90
~ '\ ~ -', r=~
~ \" =1 / I! :[:]' 2 '<11
,\, _0 I, ~';1-'
I 1 ,
;' 189/.01 I a9/.0 I
'1 .~ !
\ ~fi: ~C( ---1 ~_ _~~_ J
--
~R.. D,J
- - -/044.58 -=. - -= __ ~-=- ~
.._ ' _ --c-
Sf- )If)(jOS'5S''W
-
-- - - --- - - --- ---r- -----r ------,--
//
(
I
I
I
I
I
I
~:;', ~:: .-.
.< .. .... ... ..
. "
',-..I
.:o:..;v
':~
~
'\
)
;/, t:b-
" "L"\.
"
~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.w. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, July 28, 1992 at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the Special Use Permit
request of Ashford Development Corporation, Inc. to allow for the
erection of an "Area Identification" sign (monument) as defined in
Ordinance No.8, Section 8.07 located at Lot 1, Block 1,
Weybridge (14485 Xeon Street NW).
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
A copy of the application and location will be available at
Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
~/d
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
Publication dates: July 17, 1992
July 24, 1992
Wendy & Cameron Rabe
14484 Xeon St. NW
Andover, MN 55304
~'mler Homes
'~19 NW Coon Rapids Blvd
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
David Schneider
1211 NW Andover Blvd
Andover, MN 55304
)
J
file: weybridgesign
/
Ron & Cora Miller
14468 Xeon St. NW
Andover, MN 55304
Cathy & Dave Holcomb
14452 Xeon St. NW
Andover, MN 55304
Scot Olmstead Builders
1146 NW l37th Lane
Andover, MN 55304
Winslow Holasek
1159 NW Andover Blvd
Andover, MN 55304
"
Jerry Windschitl
3640 152nd Lane NW
Andover, MNS 55304
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 18, 1992
DATE
ITEM
NO.
ar1ance - Sl eyard
Setback - 1332 l37th
Lane NW - Susan Ham
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ~
Planning -1-J
David L. carlberg~
City Planner
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion Items
BY:
REQUEST
Susan Ham has requested a variance to Ordinance No.8, Section
6.02, which requires a ten (10') foot sideyard setback from the
property line to allow for the construction of a deck encroaching
four (4') feet into the required sideyard setback on the property
located at 1332 l37th Lane NW, legally described as Lot 4, Block
2, Hills of Bunker Lake.
The property is zoned R-4, Single Family Urban.
BACKGROUND
'-
For background information on the request, please consult the
attached staff report presented to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the minutes included in your packet materials from
their July 28, 1992 meeting.
PLANNING AND ZONING RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their July 28, 1992
meeting, recommended approval of the variance requested by
Susan Ham.
Attached is a resolution for Council review and approval.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
SECOND BY
~fO
o
~)
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -92
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE VARIANCE REQUEST OF SUSAN HAM TO
ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 6.02 WHICH REQUIRES A TEN (10') FOOT
SIDEYARD SETBACK FROM THE INTERIOR LOT LINE TO ALLOW FOR THE
PLACEMENT OF A DECK ENCROACHING FOUR (4') FEET INTO THE REQUIRED
SIDEYARD SETBACK ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1332 l37TH LANE NW,
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 4, BLOCK 2, HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE.
WHEREAS, Susan Ham has requested a variance to Ordinance
No.8, Section 6.02 which requires a ten (10') foot sideyard
setback from the interior lot line to allow for the placement of a
deck encroaching four (4') feet into the required sideyard setback
on the property legally described as Lot 4, Block 2, Hills of
Bunker Lake; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed
the request and has determined that said request meets the
criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04 in that a hardship
exists due to practical difficulties which would preclude the
property owner reasonable use of the property; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the variance request as it meets the
criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission and hereby approves the variance
requested by Susan Ham to allow for the placement of a deck
encroaching four (4') feet into the required sideyard setback on
the property legally described as Lot 4, Block 2, Hills of Bunker
Lake.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
18th day of August, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
i., \
. ~
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
July 28, 1992 - Minutes
Page 6
(SUP-Weybridge, Cont.)
MOTION by Apel, seconded by Pease to close the public hearing.
Motion carried unanimously.
~
MOTION by Peek, seconded by Pease that the Andover Planning and
Zoning Commmission recommend to the City Council approval of the
Special Use Permit requested by Ashford Development Corporation
to erect an area identification sign on Lot 1, Block 1,
W~ybridge.
The Commission finds the request meets the criteria established
in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, including: the use will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of
the community; the use will not cause serious traffic congestion
or hazards; the use will not depreciate surrounding property; and
the use is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Commission also finds that the request meets the criteria
established in Ordinance 8, Section 8.07. The Commission shall
also make the following conditions in accordance with Sections
8.07 and 5.03:
1. The area for development is larger than five acres;
2. There shall be only one sign per development;
3. The maximum square footage of the sign is 32 square feet in
area;
4. The sign is located ten feet from any property line;
5. The Special Use Permit shall be subject to annual review by
staff;
6. The applicant shall execute a written agreement with the city
for the maintenance of the sign;
7. A public hearing was held and no comments were received.
Motion carried unanimously.
~Variance - Deck Encroaching Into Sideyard Setback - 1332 l37th
Lane - Susan Ham
/ ,
'-)
Mr. Carlberg explained that this request is to allow for the
construction and placement of a deck encroaching into the
required 10 foot sideyard setback from an interior lot line on
the property located at 1332 - l37th Lane N.W. He noted that the
applicant purchased a model home believing they could construct a
deck as a sliding glass door exists six and one-half feet above
ground level where the deck is to be located. He stated that
this is a case of a house being too big for the lot.
Chairperson Dehn asked if there is a fence or a hedge on that
side of the house on the property line. Susan Ham stated that
there is nothing between the two houses.
"0
~
'. \
, )
. .
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
July 28, 1992 - Minutes
Page 7
(Variance - S. Ham, Cont.)
Commissioner Peek noted that about a year ago the Planning
Commission looked at a similar request on Crosstown Boulevard.
He believes the issue is access encroachment, not a deck
encroachment. He didn't think this is considered a hardship.
MOTION by Jovanovich, seconded by McMullen that the Andover
Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council
approval of a variance requested by Susan Ham to allow for the
construction and placement of a deck encroaching into the
required sideyard setback from an interior lot line on the
property located at 1332 - l37th Lane N.W., legally described as
Lot 4, Block 2, Hills of Bunker Lake.
The Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the
conditions established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04, citing
practical difficulties as a hardship.
Motion carried on a 5 yes (Jovanovich, Apel, Dehn, Pease,
McMullen), 2 No (Jonak, Peek) vote.
Other Business
Mr. Carlberg noted that Harefield Farms is exceeding the
conditions of their Special Use Permit. staff has not been able
to get Mr. Stuart to comply with any provisions of the ordinance.
Mr. Carlberg was instructed to send a letter to Mr. Stuart that
he has to clean up his operation or revocation of the Special Use
Permit will occur.
Mr. Carlberg also noted that a General Business district does not
allow live entertainment and wondered how a Special Use Permit
was issued for a bar with entertainment was issued for the
Commercial park. The only district that allows live
entertainment with liquor is a Shopping Center.
Chairperson Dehn declared the meeting adjourned. Meeting
adjourned at'9:44 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
u~
Vicki Volk
Acting Recording Secretary
CITY OF A1VDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLA.a\lNING COMMISSION ACTION
AGENDA ITEM
6. Variance - Sideyard
Setback - 1332 l37th Lane
NN - Susan Ham
DAT~ulv 28. 1992
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the
request of Susan Ham to allow for the construction and placement
of a deck encroaching into the required ten (10') foot sideyard
setback from an interior lot line on the property located at 1332
l37th'Lane NW.
The property is zoned R-4, Single Family Urban and is located in
the Hills of Bunker Lake subdivision.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02, establishes the mlnlmum lot
requirements for an R-4, Single Family Urban zoned lot. Section
6.02 requires a ten (10') foot sideyard setback from the interior
" property line unless the structure is a residential garage or
carport over twenty (20') feet wide.
'-
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04, establishes the variance procedure
and process. Variances may be granted where there are practical
difficulties or unecessary hardships in any way of carrying out
the strict letter of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. The
hardships or difficulties must have to do with the characteristics
of the land and not the property owner.
BACKGROUND & REVIEW
The applicant is requesting the variance to construct a deck
encroaching within six (6') feet of the side interior property
line. The applicant purchased a model believing they could
construct a deck. A sliding glass door exists six and a half
(6.5') feet above ground level where the deck is to be located.
Please consult the attached letter from the applicant for further
details.
Note: The applicant has indicated to Staff that she has consulted
their neighbor and their neighbor has indicated that they would
not have a problem with the placement of the deck as being
requested. It should also be noted that the neighbor's house is
nineteen (19') feet from the side property line.
'--
Page Two
Variance - Sideyard Setback
Susan Ham
, \
\-/' July 28, 1992
COMMISSION OPTIONS
A. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend
approval of the variance requested by Susan Ham to allow for
the construction and placement of a deck encroaching
into the required sideyard setback from an interior lot
line on the property located at 1332 l37th Lane NW, Legally
described as Lot 4, Block 2, Hills of Bunker Lake.
The Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the
conditions established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04.
B. T~e Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend
denial of the variance requested by Susan Ham to allow for the
construction and placement of a deck encroaching into the
required sideyard setback from an interior lot line on the
property located at 1332 l37th Lane NW, Legally described as
Lot 4, Block 2, Hills of Bunker Lake.
The Commission finds that the proposal does not meet the
requirements set forth in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04. The
Commission finds that no hardship exists due to the unique
shape or topography of the parcel and that the land owner
\ would not be precluded reasonable use of the property.
,~
C. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item.
)
~ /
"
'"
~
?
"
'"
to
,
, ;
.--..../
S ~'31'48' 11'
.__Z5:J.OOo,'
k, :
~'"
01<>
p~
"'~
lit ~~,
39 ? /
N~r....r
I =GO
'8 38
\~ Ii f4~~ ~ \ p
I JT." I ,~
'. ~
;.
": 37 I ~ ~ c; Drainage
\.:=I~'~
,.zt.
N.~.
XU" .
.=-~:Jt/Jf,- 36 I
2><0<
N8~'-
A
R
K
lo:
. ()
"'()
~'i
~~
""
",:
& Utility Easemen:
:
lu ;
. ()
~~
"''''
..-
():
",'
,J
I
I
;
ill
<:l
()
'"
...
~
;,.
li
'"
BOULEV~
_ _ _ II Bf046'4Z' ( ,,".19
. _. le6
.--=:
\
"-'- Sovlll L
1, ']t+~ La. Y1"'...-- -r\ . W,
r
~ -..--,--.,-..
/
;_TN
CJ
.t f<'
...
It,~1 s:1---- --r
. . ,. . '.. ~-t---_.L
~N-~~:~l~:~- ~ 1t11
~ -, - $' ~ .
.- ~
--J- ~__"___._' ____,_,__ _, ___..__,________,____
------'-e~~- ,,----,- .-.... ,--~-~<..~-..._=_.___u._...__.L 2 ----,-,---.
~.
~ -
'f"r......,:t
Jf.oQSe-
, ,
~J
,----" .. [\ ..--.'------t ,.;..J,
<tl ,
"
( I .?--
~-.-* ---~
.... c.,,~al ~,'-~
I .. ' , -~. -. ~_..
"
cl:.
I (
---- I
-. " -----
~
~ ---I
'"
( t
!
--
----~Ca..b~J ' .:::: ao I . I
,
- t I
, "'\1
----~-- -----
~
~
. _ ~~te.(' ~~ &lid
( u 1-1' : ~t i he.e; )
G.,~.
, .J. ~l
CITY of ANDOVER
(j
VARIANCE REQUEST FORM
Property Address /3.1-/ /37f,L L2/),J, /1/ l';/
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is appropriate):
L/
Block
j
Addition iL II ~ ()J r1,~",L I' L-t~
u
Lot
Plat Parcel PIN
(If metes and bounds, attach the complece legal)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
~
(/fA
_/It'/I~~ / ~
'ULt.L~ ~ R. ~
11f~1 4~
C(2.~ Az c;h
?dJ,C/o" P
Description of Request
specif~c Hardship ~l1~ /J1J-d;j J ~~ _ ~ ~
J --uJ;j~ u ~,u "1 ~ -~ </~, c~1..;
~ . J,) - . II' P {/ 0 11 /J
~\ l'IAYYJ../ - ~/ L. I:;l- UY'I".-- d./>.A'---<~I( .J..~.
c7' J
Section of Ordinance s: LJ 1- 'Current Zoning ~ - r
L~
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Applicant 6U:5 4n
Address /...13;2... /31h1... 10. n,;.
Home Phone 7..:rt.j- 771./ J--
Signature .+ -4- -,-L il~_.
I-h-rn
Il/w
Business Phone
l/.Jd. - .d- 753
Date 7- 11../_ ?~
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address
Home Phone
Business Phone
Signature
Date
\ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
,--)
~-.J
VAR IANeE
PAGE 2
I ~- /;
/u p~-:
& I r.Aaj6 d/tPt'~
/ -'
"35"" ;::;-'0 y1..'~ c;-cJ?
40' ~CC<Al/~....
prior to review by the
The following information shall be submitted
City of Andover:
1. A scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks;
adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures
'within 100 feet.
2. Application Fee: (Single Family
Otfle r Reqtie::. L s
$7~
$lOO.uO
Date Paid
7/t~/qz
Receipt jf
Rev. 1-07-92:d'A
Res. 179-91 (11-05-91)
CRITERIA FOR GRANTING A VARIANCE
In gcanting a variance, the City Council shall consider the advice and
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and:
, ') 1. I f the request is in keeping wi th the spi ri t and intent of
'--../ this Ordinance.
~)
2. If it finds that strict enforcement of this Ordinance will
cause unnue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
individual property under consideration.
3. If it finds that denying the request does not deny reasonable
use of the property.
4. Economic considerations shall not constitute an undue hardship
if reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of
the Ordinance.
o
, "-
o
, )
\..
July 14, 1992
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Andover
1685 NW Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
To Who it may concern:
I am addressing a problem I have encountered by buying a model home
in the City of Andover in December 1991. The home was built by Twin
Star Homes and is split-entry in design. A set of sliding glass
doors (6-1/2' from ground level) are off of the dining area. The
header for a deck is already built onto the house. I was only under
the impression with the sliding doors installed and the header on
the house that a deck could be built. Now, I am ready to build the
deck and I find out a deck has to be 10' from the property line and
there is only 12'. I feel it was very unfair for the builder to
have this in a model home when the average person would not knov
the variances until such time one would apply for a permit. Nov, I
have a home and can not utilize using the sliding glass doors. The
neighbors house is 19' from the property line with no windows on
that side of the house and the sleeping quarters are on the ether
side of the home. They have no problem with a deck being there.
I feel this problem has imposed a real hardship not being able to
utilize the home for the intended propose. Therefore, I am asking
the Commission for a 4' variance to be able to build a deck off the
side of the house.
Respectfully Submitted,
~~
Susan Ham
Property O\'mer
CITY OF ANDOVER
(j'
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Al1g11<:t- 1 R
, QQ?
Discussion Items
INTO EM Adopt Ordinance No. 101
.~ Deferred Assess. Policy
Finance
APP~~~Et50R
AGE~
~
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Howard D. Koolick ~
BY: Finance Director
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to adopt the enclosed
Ordinance No. 101 which establishes a policy for deferring special
assessments for senior citizens and individuals who are retired
due to disability.
The City Council is also requested to approve the publishing of a
summary of the ordinance in accordance with the city Council
directive from the August 4th meeting.
BACKGROUND
'-~
The City Council discussed the particulars of the policy at their
last meeting. Specifically, the following questions were
discussed:
1. How does the City desire to determine hardship? Should
it use an income limit, a property value limit,
combination of both or some other measure?
2. Should the term of the deferral be fixed or should the
deferral be effective until the property no longer
qualifies under state law?
3. Should the property owner be required to annually renew
the deferral or should it be the responsibility of the
owner to notify the City when the property is no longer
eligible for deferral?
4. How should interest be handled? At what rate and should
it be paid annually?
5. What payments should be required upon expiration of the
deferral?
COUNCIL ACTION
..
MOTION BY
\ TO
)
SECOND BY
'--
, ~
,~ It was my understanding that the City Council agreed on the
following aspects of the policy:
1. Hardship would be defined by an annual income of $18,000
or less.
2. The value of the property would not be used to determine
hardship.
3. The deferral shall be effective until the property no
longer qualifies for the deferral under state law.
4. The property owner shall be responsible for informing the
City when the property is no longer eligible.
5. Interest will accrue on the assessment at the rate
adopted for the assessment roll.
6. The interest shall be deferred along with the principal.
\
'J
7. Interest will cease to accrue as of the final date of the
assessment, hence the total due when the deferral ends
shall be the principal plus simple interest for the
number of years of the assessment. (For example, if
a $5,000, ten year assessment with a 6% interest rate is
deferred, after ten years the amount owed would be $8,000
($5,000 x 6% = $300 x 10 years = $3,000))
8. When the deferral ends, all amounts deferred shall be
due. Any future assessments shall be certified to the
County for collection as scheduled.
,
~)
')
'-J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 101
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE DEFERRAL OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
FOR SENIOR CITIZENS AND RETIRED DISABLED HOMEOWNERS.
The City Council of the City of Andover does hereby
ordain:
SECTION 1, SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEFERRAL. Pursuant to Minnesota
Statute Section 435.193, the City Council may defer special
assessments levied against the homestead property of a senior
citizens or retired disabled homeowner for whom it would be a
hardship to make the annual payments. The City Council will
act on all deferral requests once an application, as set forth
in Section 2, has been completed.
SECTION 2, ELIGIBILITY. Any person 65 years of age or older
or retired due to total or permanent disability may apply for
a deferral of special assessments provided the following
conditions are met:
\
'_.-J
1. Homestead. The property being assessed must be the
applicant's principal place of domicile. The classification
of the property as homestead on the County's tax rolls
combined with the applicant's name being shown as owner shall
be considered adequate proof that the property is the
applicant's homestead.
2. Annual Income. The applicant's income for the year
preceeding the year in which the application for deferment is
made shall not exceed $18,000.
The application, in a form to be prescribed by the City, shall
be completed and filed with the City Clerk, who will verify
that the applicant meets the above conditions. Any additional
forms required by the County of Anoka for recording the
deferral shall also be completed.
SECTION 3, INTEREST ON DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS. All deferred
assessments shall be subject to and charged simple interest at
the rate established by the Andover City Council in the
resolution adopting the assessment roll. This interest shall
accrue over the life of the assessment. No interest shall
accrue past the date at which the assessment would have been
fully paid if not deferred.
SECTION 4. TERMINATION OF DEFERRAL STATUS. Special
assessments deferred pursuant to the eligibility requirements
, \ set forth herein shall terminate and become payable, together
'_ ) with accumulated interest, upon the occurrence of anyone of
the following events:
Paqe 1
,
\J
)
. /
\
I
'.~
1. Transfer of ownership. The property is sold,
transferred, subdivided or in any way conveyed to another by
the individual for whom the deferral was granted.
2. Death of owner. The death of the owner qualified for
the deferral unless a surviving joint tenant or tenant in
common is eligible for the deferral benefit provided herein.
3. Non-homestead property. The property loses its
homestead status for any reason.
No hardship. The City Council determines that there
no hardship to require an immediate or partial
4.
would be
payment.
It shall be the duty of the applicant, their heirs or legal
representative to notify the City Clerk of any event which may
affect eligibility for deferment.
At the time of termination of the deferral, the City
Council may provide for payment of the deferred amounts in
installment payments in accordance with the original terms of
the special assessments.
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be effective
from and after its passage and publication according to the
law.
Adopted this 18th day of August, 1992, by the City Council of
the City of Andover.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel,
Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
Page 2
o
o
~)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 101
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE DEFERRAL OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR
SENIOR CITIZENS AND RETIRED DISABLED HOMEOWNERS.
Summary of Ordinance
Ordinance Number 101 makes available to senior citizens and
retired disabled homeowners the option of having special
assessments deferred if making the annual payments would be a
hardship. The deferral of the special assessments and interest on
them needs to be approved by the City Council after an application
is completed.
The ordinance requires the assessments be levied against the
applicant's principal residence. In order to qualify for this
deferral, the applicant's income in the prior year cannot exceed
$18,000.
The deferral remains effective until applicant transfers ownership
of the property, dies, the property is no longer their principal
place of residence or the City Council determines there is no
longer a hardship.
The full ordinance is available for inspection by any person
during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard Northwest, Andover, Minnesota.
@\'~'A
, ~'~}'.
:...
.v..
"
~~
if
0'~,:::.,~,~,,).l
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 18, 1992
DATE
BY:
Jim Schrantz
A
A
AGENDA SECTION
NO. ff .
Sta , Commlttee, Comm.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
ITEM Agreement/Wiatrak v.
NO. James Lund Const.
The City Council is requested to approve the attached Settlement
Agreement that was part of the wiatrak v. James Lund
Construction, et ale court case. The City was represented by our
insurance companies attorney George Hoff of Hoff and Allen.
George Hoff recommended a settlement.
The agreement limits the buildability of the lot to 6,000 square
feet with soil boring on each corner of the pad.
"-
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
'--I
,
\J
-)
'-_./
LAW OFFICES OF
Burke oud .JIowkius
JOHN M. BURKE
WlLUAM G, HAWKINS
SUITE 101
2119 COON ....PlOS BOULEVARD
COON RAPlOS. MINNESOTA S~33
PHONE Ul121 78421198
\
o EC1Tf! E
n( MAY 7 19921D
..-
CITY OF ANDOVER
May 4, 1992
Mr. Stephen Nash
Babcock, Locher, Neilson & Mannella
118 Main Street
Anoka, MN 55303
Re: Wiatrak v. James Lund Construction, et al.
Court File No. C9-90-4707
Dear Mr. Nash:
Enclosed please find a draft copy of a Settlement Agreement
between the City of Andover and James Lund Construction. This
pertains to our discussions held on the day of trial whereby the
City would issue building permits for construction of homes on
three lots which currently would be considered unbuildable. I
believe the agreement accurately reflects our discussions. If
it is agreeable, please advise and I will have the agreement
placed into final form.
Sincerely,
William G. Hawkins
Andover City Attorney
WGH:mk
Ene.
cc: Mr. James E. Schrantz
\
~~
~
'\
~.../
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF ANOKA
TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
----------------------------- CASE TYPE: CIVIL/PROPERTY DAMAGE
Stephen P. Wiatrak,
Court File No. C9-90-4707
Plaintiff,
'vs.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
James Lund Construction, Inc.,
a Minnesota corporation~ James
Lund~ City of Andover, a
Municipal corporation~ and
Douglas Maciaszek,
Defendants.
WHEREAS, the undersigned are parties to the above
captioned lawsuit~ and
WHEREAS, Lund Construction, Inc. also has before the
City of Andover that certain plan known as Lund's Evergreen
Estates 5th Addition (hereinafter 5th Addition) which is subject
to a Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A~ and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to settle the foregoing
matter with the Plaintiff and also settle certain areas of
dispute between them with respect to the 5th Addition~
NOW, THEREFORE, THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY AGREE AS
FOLLOWS:
1. That the provisions of paragraph 1 of Exhibit A
shall be satisfied with respect to Lots 1 and 2, Block 3 and Lot
4, Block 2, in the 5th Addition, by James Lund Construction,
-1-
. ,
C)
. ,
'J
~J
Inc. providing a building pad on the site with a minimum area of
6,000 square feet, at finished grade, with a minimum width of
100 feet and minimum depth of 60 feet. Within the building pad
area, there shall be sufficient area for the location of a
septic tank.
The area within the building pad and septic tank
area shall be shown by survey prepared by a registered surveyor
and shall be staked on the lot. All construction of structures
shall be done within the building pad, with septic tank
constructed wi thin the septic tank area.
Lund Construction,
Inc. shall cause to be recorded against Lots 1 and 2, Block 3
and Lot 4, Block 2 a restriction, running with the land,
restricting construction of the structure to the building pad
area and the tank to the septic tank area. Said restriction to
be in a form approved by the City Attorney for Andover.
The City shall be provided with a soil boring at each
corner of the building pads and one soil boring from the septic
tank area to a depth of 25 feet and certification by a
registered engineer other than James Lund or an employee of
James Lund or Lund Construction, Inc. or Merila & Associates,
Inc. that the area within the building pad and septic tank area
and the soils thereunder are suitable for intended construction.
The agreement set forth herein shall have no binding
effect on the City's consideration, administration or
interpretation of the remaining provisions of Exhibit A or the
Ordinances of the City of Andover, including without limitation
Ordinances 10 and 37.
-2-
I.' ~
2. James Lund and Lund Construction, Inc. hereby
. "-
~ jointly and severally, agree to defend and indemnify the City of
Andover, its officers, agents and employees from any and all
claims which may be brought against them related in any way to
the soil conditions in the 5th Addition, on Lots 1 and 2, Block
3, and/or Lot 4, Block 2.
3. Except as modified in Paragraph 1 above the
Developer's Agreement between the parties remains in full force
and effect.
CITY OF ANDOVER
LUND CONSTRUCTION, INC.
By
Its Administrator
By
Its President
, "
\.~
James Lund
I \.
,..-J
-~-
@\--
~.C''t'..',..
\~~
,'1
U,,,,,.,,,,../)l
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Auoust 18. 1992
ITEM
NO,
Appoint Election Judge
Admin.
V. VOlk~.O.
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Staff, Committee, Comm.
BY:
The City Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution
appointing judges for the Primary Election to be held on Tuesday,
September 15, 1992.
V:Attach.
~-
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'- - ~
, "-
, \
V
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO. R
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE PRIMARY ELECTION
TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 15, 1992 IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains:
The persons as shown below are hereby appointed judges for the
Primary Election to be held on Tuesday, september 15, 1992 in the
City of Andover.
Precinct 1, Andover Fire Station *2
Leone Struwve - DFL
Jeorgette Knoll - DFL
Shirley Sanborn - IR
Precinct lA, Grace Lutheran Church
Verna Hennen - IR
Carol Bradley - DFL
Ann Lown - IR
!
'-.../
Precinct 2, Riverdale Assembly of God
Diane Patchen - IR
Alice Gelling - IR
Marian Heidelberger - DFL
Mabel ottenstroer - DFL
Quinley Free - DFL
Rosemary Kirkevold - DFL
Maureen Bushard - DFL
Precinct 3, Andover Elementary School
Mary West - DFL
Nancy Kramp - IR
Violet Erickson - IR
Mary Sullivan - IR
Geraldine Erickson - DFL
Eleanor Apel - DFL
Loretta Sunderland - IR
precinct 3A, Andover Fire Station *1
Sharon Rzeszutek - IR
Delores Meyers - DFL
Cindy Ryhn - DFL
Barb Collette - IR
Carole Hibbard - IR
Susan Wood - DFL
"-
;
'. /
Jan Greer - IR
Sylvia Volk - IR
Wanda Grant - DFL
Barb Alto - DFL
John Johanson - DFL
June Ellison - IR
Rene Kroll - DFL
Darlene Stone - IR
Cleo Smith - DFL
Susan Wallace-Nelson - DFL
Kathy Tingelstad - IR
Mary Jo Bonin - IR
Lew Richards - IR
Barb Bassing - IR
Ruth Maus - IR
Peggy Olson - DFL
Lorraine Malamen - IR
Maureen Grailer - DFL
Carol Riecken - DFL
Lois Spadgenske - IR
Mary May - DFL
Terry VanNote - IR
, Precinct 4, Family of Christ Lutheran Church
\J
Sue Rylander - DFL
Judy Snyder - IR
Ruth Johnson - DFL
Marlene Palm - DFL
Mark Kalk - IR
Marlye Riddel - DFL
Cindy Brostrom - DFL
Loretta Boyum - DFL
Mary White - IR
Susan Beal - DFL
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
18th
day of
August
, 1992.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Attest:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
,
)
-'- /
, ,
,
-'- ../
@\"-.'
~';;\\
\~,
[ ~
1/
U'~ j{
."~ ,,'v'
<;:,,~ .~-;:'/
- '~'~':''''""f.''
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
August 18, 1992
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee, Comm.
ITEM Approve Newsletter
NO. Contract
I/J.
Administration
Rhonda Anderson~
~~~~ QS
BY:~
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the Contract from
Express Advertising & printing for the publication of the Andover
Express.
Under Item #6. Payment. The price per page has increased from
$75.00 a page to $125.00 a page.
Note that the contract is for a one year term as stated in Item
#7.
Attached: Contract
'-
MOTION BY
'fO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CONTRACT FOR CITY OF ANDOVER NEWSLETTER
Page 1
7/9/92
o
This agreement made and entered into this 9th day of July, 1992, by
and between the City of Andover, a Municipal Corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "City" and Express Advertising & Printing
Services at 2006 First Avenue North, Anoka, Minnesota 55303,
hereinafter referred to as "Contractor".
WITNESSETH:
The Contractor has submitted this contract to the City of Andover
for the production and distribution of a monthly newsletter. The
parties wish to reduce to writing the terms and conditions regulating
the production and distribution of said newsletter.
Based upon the mutual considerations contained herein, the parties
agree as follows:
1. Purpose of ANDOVER EXPRESS. The Andover Express is intended to
provide a major resource for communication to the citizens of the
City of activities within the general Andover area and to promote
a positive image of the area by providing concise, timely, accurate
c=) and useful information from and about the City.
2. Criteria
A. Size. The Andover Express shall be published in a tabloid
form, 11 1/2 inches by 13 1/2 inches in size, on better quality
newsprint or recycled paper. Express reserves the right to increase
or decrease the number of pages from issue to issue depending upon
the availability of news articles provided the Contractor has
acquired adequate advertising to cover their costs.
b. Advertising. The Contractor may sell space to advertisers
on such terms, conditions and prices as the Contractor may determine.
The Contractor also has the right to insert quality advertising as
a separate insert.
c. Content. Non-profit, community organizations and
individuals will be given an opportunity to submit articles. Each
contributing organization shall be responsible for the preparation
and submission in a timely fashion of articles for publication and
for the proof-reading of its articles.
C)
CONTRACT FOR CITY OF ANDOVER NEWSLETTER
Page 2
7/9/92
o
3. Publication Dates. The Andover Express will be published on the
third Friday of each month, with the exception of the December and
January issues. Deadlines and publication dates for this twelve
month contract period are as follows:
Deadline Date
July 8
August 12
September 9
October 7
November 11
December 2
January 13
February 10
March 10
April 7
May 12
June 9
Publication Date
July 17
August 21
September 18
October 16
November 20
December 12
January 22
February 19
March 19
April 16
May 21
June 18
,/-\
V
4. Distribution. The Andover Express shall be distributed by the
Contractor by mailing through the U. S. Mail at the Anoka Post Office.
Distribution shall be made within four days after the publication
date. The Andover Express shall be distributed to each residential
unit, including apartments, townhouses and condominiums and to each
business located within the community.
5. Production. The Contractor shall be responsible for all aspects
of production of the Andover Express including, but not limited to,
the typesetting, layout, printing and distribution.
6. Payment. Cost is determined per page, based on actual per page
cost to produce the Andover Express. Pages will be charged at $125.00
per page. Invoicing will be done the first of every month for that
month's issue. Copies of the Andover Express will be delivered to
the City on the date of pUblication.
7. Term. This contract will be in effect for one year from the date
of this contract.
'::J
o
CJ
':J
CONTRACT FOR CITY OF ANDOVER NEWSLETTER
Page 3
7/9/92
8. Termination. The City reserves the right to terminate this
Agreement if the City, in its sole discretion, determines that the
quality of the newsletter fails to meet the standards as contained
in this Agreement and in the understandings reached between the
parties or for any other reason. Termination shall be effective 30
days after the City gives notice in writing to the Contractor. The
Contractor may terminate this Agreement effective 30 days after
giving written notice to the City.
9. Independent Contractor. It is understood and agreed that the
Contractor is an independent contractor and is not an employee of
the City or any other participating organization. As such the
Contractor agrees to save and hold harmless the City and the
participating organizations from any and all claims which may arise
out of the Contractor's performance of this Contract.
In witness whereof the parties hereto have entered into this
Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
EXPRESS ADVERTISING
& PRINTING SERVICES
~~YS~;:;; 1!::i~'::.;L
CITY OF ANDOVER
By
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
By
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
... .'.... ,"
. .- -' .
.... ,." .,.- .."
I~~~~
, "
\J ,,' ,'.',' ,,' ,,' ,,'
APYERTISING & PRINTING SERVICES
August 13, 1992
Rhonda Anderson
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
Andover, Minnesota 55304
Dear Rhonda:
Thank you for the opportunity to continue working with the City of Andover
through the Andover Express. It has been a pleasure this past year and we
look forward to another successful year.
The only change that has been made in this contract as compared to last year
is in the cost per page to the city. Our actual cost to produce the Andover
Express exceeds $1500.00, or $125.00 per page based on a 12 page issue.
This cost includes the printing, labeling and mailing expense, but does not
include our actual labor, sales commissions or overhead costs. I feel it fair to
charge the city the actual cost per page stated above, as the addition of the
City Newsletter is beneficial in the readership of our paper as well as the
recognition.
Thank you again for this opportunity.
Best regards,
~j''> t.J ~ '-- ~~
Crystal Bennek
President
North. Anoka,Minnesota 55303.612-422-8110. fax612-422-0413
@\'...'
'. ~'"
~~\
"\
\\
,:.)
",
.\\~I
'--.../ '~~"","
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. ff .
Sta , Comm~ttee, Comm.
ITEM Road Committee Report
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
August 18, 1992
Engineering
#
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to discuss the items that were
presented to the Road Committee on August 5, 1992. Attached is
the Road Committee agenda and the minutes of the meeting.
Councilmembers Perry and MCKelvey are on the Committee and will
discuss the items with the City Council.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
\.- -~
. ')
\,J
-)
, "\
'--/
Q) "',
,..l'\, ;'
"":.. ,/
"..........._- .-/
.'.-.--""
5:00 P.M.
CITY of ANDOVER
"
Road Committee Meeting
August 5, 1992
1. Minimum Maintenance Roads
2. 1993 MSA Street Construction
3. Sealcoat/Crackseal Program
4. unpaved Street Program
5. Reconstruction of City Street 20 Year Program
6. Njordmark-Dale
7. Road Classification
8. Capital Equipment
9. Other Business
10. Adjournment
. \
U
,J
\
'--,j
(~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
ROAD COMMITTEE MEETING - AUGUST 5, 1992
MINUTES
".
'''-'''''''>--:~''b~.-''
The Road Committee Meeting was called to order by Chairperson
Perry on August 5, 1992; at 5:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W., Andover, Minnesota.
Members present:
Also present:
McKelvey
City Engineer, Jim Schrantz and Public Works
Superintendent, Frank Stone
Item #1
The Committee discussed the possibility of having the following
streets as minimum maintenance roads:
- Jivaro Street NW north of the intersection of County Road 158
and CSAH 7.
- Xeon Street NW north of Andover Boulevard.
- 149th Avenue NW east side of Round Lake Boulevard.
Recommendations of the Committee are as follows:
- Request City Attorney to research to determine if there is
the right-of-way or road easement for Jivaro Street NW' If
the right-of-way or easement does not exist, can the City
eliminate this from the street program (for example,
snowplowing and road grading).
- Designate Xeon Street NW and 149th Avenue NW as minimum
maintenance roads.
Item #2
The Committee has discussed the 1993 MSA Construction Program.
The recommendation and the priority is as follows:
1. University Avenue south and north of 157th Avenue NW.
2. Tulip Street NW north of 161st Avenue NW to 169th Avenue NW.
3. Ward Lake Drive near the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks.
The Committee did recognize that Eldorado Street NW to County
Road 116 may be a possibility depending on the outcome of the DNR
permit.
o
~
~
Item #3
The Committee reviewed the reque~t by Public Works Director and
recommended that the maintenance program be placed back on
schedule for all city streets. The streets would be crack sealed
and seal coated which will help maintain the strength of the
pavement section. If the cracks in the existing system do not
get filled, moisture enters and works its way down the base which
becomes saturated losing its strength. From there, the pavement
begins to crumble causing more to form.
Item #4
The Committee discussed the issue regarding the streets that are
unpaved. The City Staff has received calls from property owners
requesting a unpaved section to be paved. For example, property
owners in Cedar Hills River Estates 2nd Addition (which is paved)
have to drive on a little section on 178th Lane NW which is
unpaved to get onto a paved road in Cedar Hills Estates.
Another example is Grow Oak View Estates. The property owners
have to drive a gravel road prior to getting to their subdivision
which is paved. The Committee did feel that this is important
enough to discuss with the City Council.
Item #5
The Committee discussed the possibility of a program with regards
to a total reconstruction of city streets when the streets
become to a point that they are beyond repair (fix Potholes,
cracksealing and overlays).
A good example is Njordmark Dale. How should these projects be
initiated? Options are by petition or have the City do the
project with the possibility of having the projects financed in
the following manner:
- Benefitting property owners pay 100% of the reconstruction.
- participation by both the City and property owners.
- The City pay 100% of the reconstruction costs.
The Committee felt the City Council should discuss this.
Item #6
The Committee will hold an informational meeting this fall with
the property owners. Item #5's outcome will determine how the
project will be paid for.
Item #7
The Committee reviewed the Functional Reclassification of Minor
Arterial and recommends approval.
Item #8
/ \ The Committee reviewed the request for Capital Equipment that has
'-/ been proposed by the Public Works Department for 1993.
The Committee recommends the equipment purchases be discussed
with the City Council.
Respectfully submitted,
~/~
Todd J. Haas
Recording Secretary
~
" )
@\~"'."'..:;\
x:-\
~~
!~
it
O ~ _!:i
'."',. - ...<,.::.>-
--.:.:..,':':'~":":"::>
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
August 18, 1992
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Non-Discussion Item
ITEM Functional Reclassificat on
NO. of Minor Arterial BY:
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
Jim Schrantz
APPROI~XJ FOR
AGEND~
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the attached resolution
approving Anoka County Functional Reclassification of Minor
Arterial.
The letter and map were part of the packet on July 7, 1992.
The County has asked that the City Council pass a resolution.
Note: The Road Committee reviewed the reclassification at their
meeting of August 5, 1992 and has recommended approval.
Attached: Resolution
'--
/
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
'-
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING ANOKA COUNTY FUNCTIONAL RECLASSIFICATION OF
MINOR ARTERIAL AS PART OF ANOKA COUNTY 2010 PLAN.
WHEREAS, as the Andover City Council has reviewed Anoka County
2010 Plan concerning Functional Reclassification of Minor Arterial;
and
WHEREAS, the Andover City Council concurs with the County
recommendation; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Andover
approves the County's recommended Reclassification Plan as presented
with the letter dated June 28, 1992 by Jon Olson, Deputy County
Engineer.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted
by the City Council at a
regular
meeting this
18th day of
~J
August 18
, 19~, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution and
voting against same
Councilmen
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
'\
, )
AA'....'.
'"i:~\
\;
~:
"'~)
: i ")'
,/ '-." -. ............~,/.
----- ...,'::::'-- ..'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
August 18, 1992
AGENDA SECTION
NO. . .
Non-D~scuss~on
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering ~
BY: Todd J. Haas
APPROV~EOR
AGE~A
( )
BY:!
/
ITEM Award Bid/92-10/
N~~.Pheasant Meadows
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
bids and awarding contract for the improvement of Project 92-10
for sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm drain in the area
of Pheasant Meadows.
The bid opening is scheduled for Monday, August 17, 1992.
Information on the bids will be presented at the meeting.
"
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
\. -'
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
,
)
-~/
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 92-10 FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN,
STREET AND STORM DRAIN
CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF PHEASANT MEADOWS
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in
Council Resolution No. 127-92, dated JUla 21
19 92 , bids were received, opened and tabulate according
wi~esults as follows:
,
to law
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate
as being the apparent low bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into a contract with the
~ amount of for construct~on of the
~ ~ improvements; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until
the contract has been executed and bond requirements met.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
meeting this 18th day of
City Council at a
August
regular
, 19~, with Councilmen
voting in favor of
the resolution, and Councilmen
voting
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Ortte~ - Mayor
ATTEST:
/ ,
~/
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
@~~'
\0:"-
"'\
\c."
'"
~~
'~
};
, fA !.'
u~r\,
,. " .
. '-, ,j')
"", "'.-'-
,.,-'-,..:"......,..,~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 18, 1992
DATE
Non-Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
~
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ITEM Award Bid/92-15/Hidden
NO. Creek East 5th Addn.
BY:
Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
bids and awarding contract for the improvement of Project 92-15
for sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm drain in the area
of Hidden Creek East 5th Addition.
The bid opening is scheduled for Monday, August 17, 1992.
Information on the bids will be presented at the meeting.
'-
MOTION BY
) TO
~-
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
o
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 92-15 FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN,
STREET AND STORM DRAIN
CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF HIDDEN CREEK EAST 5TH ADDITION
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in
Council Resolution No. 126-92, dated JUla 21
19 92 , bids were received, opened and tabulate according
wi~esults as follows:
,
to law
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate
as being the apparent low bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into a contract with the
" '\ amount of for construction of the
,~ improvements; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until
the contract has been executed and bond requirements met.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
meeting this 18th day of
City Council at a
regular
August
, 19~, with Councilmen
voting in favor of
the resolution, and Councilmen
voting
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
ATTEST:
, \
''-..../
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
August 18, 1992
AGENDA SECTION
NO. .
Non-Discuss~on
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
~
lTci'M Approve Plans &
NJ~ SpecsjWell #4/92-13
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving
final plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for
bids for Project 92-13 for Well #4 construction.
The plans and specs are available in the engineering office for
review.
,
'-
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
'-
u
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 92-13, WATER SYSTEM
WELL #4
CONSTRUCTION.
FOR
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 138-92 adopted by the City
Council on the 4TH day of August , 19 92 , TKDA
has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 92-13
for Well #4 construction; and
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications
the City Council for their review on the 18th
August , 19 92
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to
hereby approve the Final plans and Specifications .
were presented to
day of
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as
required by law, with such bids to be opened at 10:00 AM
Monday, September 14 19 92 at the Andover City Hall.
,
~~
MOTION seconded by Councilman
by the City Council at a
regular
meeting this
and adopted
18th day of
Councilmen
, 19~, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution and
voting against same
August
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel -Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/ ~
~
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion Item
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE August 18. 1992
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
'0
ITEM Approve Final
N~b.payment/91-19
Engineering
~*
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
work and directing final payment to Erickson Construction for
Project 91-19 for the improvement of trunk watermain in the
following area: Crosstown Boulevard.
Also attached is a letter from TKDA recommending final payment.
Engineers Est. was $232,640.00
Contract was $215,411.00
Final Contract is $229,168.96
'-
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
'-
()
, )
1
, /
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND DIRECTING FINAL PAYMENT TO
ERICKSON CONSTRUCTION FOR PROJECT NO. 91-19 FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
OF TRUNK WATERMAIN
IN THE FOLLOWING AREA: CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written
Andover on Februart 18
Construction of Burnsvil e, MN
the construction in accordance with
contract signed with the City of
, 19 92, Erickson
has satisfactorily completed
such contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover,
Minnesota that the work completed under said contract is hereby
accepted and approved; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby
directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such
contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
18th day
City Council at a
regular
meeting this
of
, 19 92 , with Councilmen
August
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was
passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria volk - City Clerk
:0 TKDA
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
1.
2.
0
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
TOlTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
1500 MERITOR TOWER
..... CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUl. MINNESOTA 55101.2140
'p'HONE'S12t.202-44ll0 FAX:812t.202.Q083
August 11, 1992
Mr. James Schrantz
City Administrator
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
llndover,~esota 55304
Re: Crosstown Boulevard Trunk Watennain Extension
Project No. 91-19
llndover, Minnesota
Commission No. 9963
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
Attached are the following documents for the above referenced project:
TItree (3) copies of Certificate No.3 (Final) in the amount of $16,360.86.
TItree (3) copies of Change Order No.1 (Compensating) in the amount of (Add)
$12,661.30.
Three (3) copies of Change Order No.2 in the amount of (Add) $1,096.38.
Consent of Surety to Final Payment.
Lien Waivers from suppliers and subcontractors.
~esota State Income Tax Withholding Form IC-134.
Maintenance Bond effective August 3,1992 to August 3,1994.
The work has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications. We recommend
fmal payment to the contractor in accordance with warrantee provisions of the contract.
The fmal contract cost is $229,168.96.
Sincerely yours,
/~~~
JLD:j
Enclosures
, '0,
\.-.-/
@\" ""~<:'i;:",,\,,\,
:'l.
'1
f,:
I,
~
~ b
'j" .:'
\...J-"'';.~,,:,:..::::t~;--'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. . . t
Non-D~scuss~on I em
DATE Auqust 18, 1992
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering ~
\
ITEM Approve Final
J'1. Payment/91-25
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
work and directing final payment to Mille Lacs Contracting,
Inc. for Project 91-25 for the improvement of sanitary sewer,
watermain, street and storm drains in Hidden Creek East
4th Addition.
Also attached is a letter from TKDA recommending final payment.
Feasibility Estimated Contract was $110,993.00
Contract amount was $83,098.00
Final Contract is $85,492.89
-~--'"
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
'I
(J
"J
)
~ /
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND DIRECTING FINAL PAYMENT TO
MILLE LACS CONTRACTING FOR PROJECT NO. 91-25 FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STREET AND STORM DRAIN
IN THE FOLLOWING AREA: HIDDEN CREEK EAST 4TH ADDITION
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of
Andover on Februar~ 4 , 19 92, Mille
Lacs Contracting of Wah on, MN nas-satisfactorily
completed the construction in accordance with such contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover,
Minnesota that the work completed under said contract is hereby
accepted and approved; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby
directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such
contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
18th day
City Council at a
regular
meeting this
of
August
, 19 92 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was
passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
\~ TKDA
TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
1500 MERrTOR TOWER
44< CEDAR STREET
SAlNT PAUL, MINNESOTA55101-2'''''
PHONE:812fZQ2-4400 FAX:812fZQ2-<l083
August 11, 1992
Mr. J ames Schrantz
City Administrator
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, Minnesota 55304
Re: Hidden Creek East 4th Addition
Project No. 91-25
Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 10055
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
Attached are the following documents for the above referenced project:
1. Three (3) copies of Certificate No.3 (Final) in the amount of $9,601.42.
)
2.
Three (3) copies of Change Order No.2 (Compensating) in the amount of (Add) $394.85.
3. Consent of Surety to Final Payment.
4. Lien Waivers from suppliers and subcontractors.
5. Minnesota State Income Tax Withholding Form IC-134.
The work has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications. We recommend
rmal payment to the contractor in accordance with warrantee provisions of the contract.
The rmal contract cost is $85,492.89.
Sincerely yours,
JLD:j
Enclosures
,
\
... .J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Non-Discussion Items
Finance
HK
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
Rescind Resolution
Number R78-6
BY:
Howard D. Koolick
Finance Director
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to adopt the enclosed
resolution which rescinds resolution number R78-6 which provided
for the deferral of special assessments for senior citizens.
BACKGROUND
Resolution Number R78-6 (a copy of which is attached) was adopted
in 1976 and established the policy for deferring special
assessments for senior citizens. Earlier on the agenda, the City
Council will have discussed and hopefully adopted Ordinance No.
101 which would conflict with resolution R78-6.
The enclosed resolution will rescind the 1976 resolution.
'---
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
'-
u
:J
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -92
A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NUMBER R78-6 WHICH PROVIDED FOR
THE DEFERRAL OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Andover has adopted
Ordinance No. 101 which establishes the policies and procedures
for deferring special assessments for senior citizens and retired
disabled homeowners; and
WHEREAS, City of Andover Resolution Number R78-6 now
conflicts with Ordinance No. 101.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover the Resolution Number R78-6 is hereby rescinded.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
day of August, 1992.
18th
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
CITY OF .<\J.'mOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
No. K78-6
;-Y
_/\
" \
'--./ A RESOLUTION PROVI.I?ING FOR THE DEFERMENT OF SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS FOR PERSONS 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER FOR WHOM
IT WOULD ,BE A HARDS"rlIP TO MAKE PAYMENTS.
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes authorize the City of Andover
upon proper application, to defer the payment of special assessments against
any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older on
January 1 of the payment year and for whom it would be a hardship to
make the payments, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the deferral of
assessments should be granted to any person otherwise qualified who shall
make proper application claiming that the a=ual principal and interest
due on an assessment is in excess of 2.,1 t2"/0 of his current a=ual income
and, therefore, a hardship for him. The proper application form shall be
provided by the City. .Any homestead parcel with an Assessor's Market
Value in e.~cess of $65,000 shall not qualify.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the .Andover City Council
that special assessments against any homestead property owned by a person
65 year s of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payment
. '\ be deferred subject to the aforementioned income and property value conditions
",-, I
'-/ upon submission of the appropriate application signed by the qualified person.
FUR.THER BE IT RESOLVED that an interest rate of 6% be applied
to the principa.l and interest of the assessment to be deferred and shall be
payable in accordance with the terms and provisions of Minnesota Sl:atutes.
FURTHER B-E IT RESOLVED that the right of deferment is
automatically terminated as provided =der Minnesota. Statutes.
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that applications for deferments for
a. particular year must be submitted by October 15 of the preceeding year.
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of the current Minnesota
Statutes relative to deferred assessments for senior citizens is made a part
of this resolution by reierence.
Adopted by the Andover City' Council this 7th day of October
, 1976.
\~jcL:e~u~
eider - Mayor
@\""~~'
~.
\\.
'-:'
\~
ii
\J'~ if
. ; ..' ,~-::y
",,,,;,:-..:.~.,,:,~~,,,
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE lI"g""'+-
1 R w
'991
Non-Discussion Items
Finance
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM Adopt Resolution
NO. PIR Fund Reimbursement
I .
Howard D. Koolickff)(
BY: Finance Director
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to adopt the attached
resolution which reimburses the Improvements Unfinanced Fund
$68,721.78 for costs incurred relating to four projects that
should be funded out of the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund.
BACKGROUND
On August 4th, the City Council sold $4.8 million in bonds to
finance a variety of projects. The following four projects were
intentionally not included in the bond issue:
'--
89-22
89-17
89-15
90-3 &
90-16
Wandersee Addition
Hidden Creek East Second
Kirby Estates
Kensington Estates Fifth
and Sixth Additions
Projects 89-17 and 89-22 were not included in the bonds since
under U.S. Treasury regulations they could not be financed by tax-
exempt bonds since they had been in service for more than one
year. Kirby Estates was not included since the assessments are
fully paid. Projects 90-3 and 90-16 were excluded from the bond
issue since there are only four lots remaining and I anticipate
that these will be paid before the end of the year.
When the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund was established, a
Public Improvement Account was included to account for the costs
of assessible projects as well as receive the assessments when
paid. Since all four projects above were assessed, I would
recommend reimbursing the Improvements Unfinanced Fund with money
from the Public Improvement Account in the Permanent Improvement
Revolving Fund.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
SECOND BY
~r TO
o
The Public Improvement Account's balance as of 7/31/92 is
approximately as follows:
Balance as of 12/31/91
1992 special assessment
collections
Estimated interest earnings
Estimated Balance as of 7/31/92
$706,698
37,250
17,000
$760,948
The cash balance and assessment balance of each project is as
follows:
Cash Assessment
Balance Balance
Project 07/31/92 07/31/92
89-22 -$7,987.20 $ 8,971
89-17 -$32,255.22 42,080
89-15 13,624.75 -0-
90-3 & 90-16 -$42,104.11 20,582
Totals -$68,721.78 $71,633
The difference between the cash and assessment balance for project
, \ #90-3 & #90-16 relates to the City's share of street and storm
o drainage work done outside the project. In March of 1990, the
City Council agreed that the City would pay for the portion of the
work outside the plat with bond funds used to finance the sewer
and street work in Red Oaks. Since these bonds were part of the
bond call that established the PIR Fund, the costs should be paid
by the PIR Fund.
, ')
'J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -92
'0
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING $68,721.78 FROM THE PERMANENT
IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING FUND TO THE IMPROVEMENTS UNFINANCED FUND TO
FINANCE FOUR COMPLETED PROJECTS AND ASSIGNING THE FUTURE SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT COLLECTIONS FOR THESE PROJECTS TO THE PERMANENT
IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING FUND.
WHEREAS, the City has sold $4.8 million in improvement bonds
to finance a number of projects; and
WHEREAS, projects #89-17 and #89-22, known as Wandersee
Addition and Hidden Creek East Second Addition respectively, were
not eligible for inclusion with the bonds under United States
Treasury regulations; and
WHEREAS, project #89-15 known as Kirby Estates was not
included in the recent bond issue since the assessments for this
project have been paid in full and, together with interest
earnings, total more than the costs incurred; and
WHEREAS, projects #90-3 and #90-16, known as Kensington
Estates Fifth and Sixth Additions were excluded from the bond
issue since all lots should be sold by the end of 1992; and
'\
WHEREAS, the City has established a Permanent Improvement
Revolving Fund containing a Public Improvement Account designed to
finance construction and receive revenue from assessable projects.
''-..../
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Andover hereby approves the transfer from $68,721.78 from
the Public Improvement Account of the Permanent Improvement
Revolving Fund to the Improvements Unfinanced Fund to reimburse
this fund for past construction costs incurred.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all future assessment collections
for Projects #89-22, #89-17, #90-3 and #90-16 be credited to the
Public Improvement Account within the Permanent Improvement
Revolving Fund.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
August , 1992, with
voting in
city Council on this
18th
day of
Councilmembers
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
\
,
'--/
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
'0
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Auaust IS. 1992
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Non-Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
ITEM Adopt Resolution
N~ Designating Depository
DCD,
Howard D. Koolick H:K
BY: Finance Director
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to adopt the attached
resolution which designates Smith Barney as a supplemental
depository for investment purposes.
BACKGROUND
On January 7, 1992, the City Council approved resolution number
ROOl-92 designating the City's official depositories and
supplemental depositories for investment purposes. The resolution
included all the organization's with which City dealt. Smith
Barney was not included because did not have a public funds
department.
'-
On Monday August 3, Smith Barney opened its public funds
department by hiring Barbara Roche, who was previously a Vice-
President with Marquette Bank. Barbara has worked with the City
of Andover since 1985. She left Marquette in July since her
position and potentially her department was being phased out as
part of the purchase of Marquette by First Bank System.
The resolution, if approved, will authorize the City to use Smith
Barney as a supplemental depository for investment purposes. The
potential benefits of adding this additional supplemental
depository include the following:
1. Potentially slightly higher rates due to increased
competition.
2. Working with an individual who is familiar with the City
and its staff.
3. An additional source of economic information.
4. An investment outlet for the Treasurer where she knows
and feels comfortable with the person she is working with
until a new Finance Director is found.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'-
;~
, '\
\.J
, '\
,--j
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -92
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS UPHAM & CO.
INCORPORATED AS A SUPPLEMENTAL DEPOSITORY FOR INVESTMENT PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 118 sets forth the
procedures for the deposit of public funds and requires the
Andover City Council to annually designate official depositories
and supplemental depositories for investment purposes; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Andover has
previously adopted resolution number ROOl-92 designating which
depositories may be used for investment purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover that Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. Incorporated is
designated as a supplemental depository for investment purposes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Treasurer is hereby
authorized to sign all documents required to open an account with
Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. Incorporated.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
day of August, 1992.
18th
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
@\~",.'
;.~,
u~)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 18, 1992
DATE
ITEM
NO.
.:1.
Receive July
Financial statements
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
Howard D. Koolick ~
Finance Director
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion Items
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to receive the July 1992
financial statements for the General, Water and Sewer Funds.
Please note that these statements include only the expenditures
and receipts that relate to 1992. Expenditures made and revenue
collected in January thru July which relate to 1991 have been
charged to 1991 in accordance with accounting policies.
Should there be any questions about an item, please contact me
prior to the meeting so that I may have adequate time to research
the question..
COUNCIL ACTION
/' '
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'----
"
" .../
CITY OF ANDOVER
YtA~ 10 UAlt 0UMMA~lt0
FOR
GENERAL, WATER AND SEWER FUNDS
As Or-TDUI82
Revised
l1udEjet
Year to Date Percentage
Ac"'tlJa 1 ~ema 1 n 1 nEj
-------------- ----------
G ENE R A L FUN D
REV E N U E S
-----------------------
-----------------------
,
',J
GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES
BUSINESS LICENSES AND PERMITS
NON-BUSINESS LICENSES & PERMITS
BuildinEj Related
Other
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
Stt'eet Li Ejht i nEj
Other
COURT FINES
0PtCIAL AS0tS5M8rrS
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
Interest Ear'ned
Retunds and Relmbursements
Other
TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS
Fr'ori'lJtdmin. Irllot. Fund
From TIF 1-1 Fund
From TIF 1-2 Fund
6~00.OO
24,000.00
6,000.00
1,113,714.00
2-0~325. 00
247,723.00
6,250.00
61,4,326.00
599,431.04
4,469.65
235,328.96
3,!J92.~ti
336,717.37
46
78
5
3ti
47
56,900.00
23,300.00
40,000.00
1,000.00
54,600.00
20,221,.00
9,300.00
33,967.70
27,611.71
17,438.44
1, ~ I ti.;:l ti
14,360.52
9,6~1l:J
10,032.45
40
( 18)
56
( ~ I )
73
03
(7)
100
100
100
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 2,336,962.00
1,294,621.94
~~ -- -----
------------
114
--- ----- --
------------
')
--------------------- ----- - --------
'\
" .../
CITY OF ANDOVER
YeAR 10 DAlt SU~~t~
FOR
GENERAL, WATER AND SEWER FUNDS
As of 31Ju192
Revised
Budget
---------------
Year to Date Percentage
Actual Remalnlng
-------------- ----------
G ENE R A L FUN D
E X P E N D I T U RES
-----------------------
-----------------------
, \
,V
CITY COUNCIL
NEWSLETTER
~1A YOR
ELECTIONS
ADMINISTRATION
FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION
AUDITING
ASSESSING
ATTORNEY
PLANNING AND ZONING
DATA PROCESSING
CITY HALL BUILDING
FIRE STATION BUILDING
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
SENIOR CITIZEN'S CENTER
EQUIPMENT BUILDING
EN~,lNEERIN('
POLICE PROTECTION
F IRE PROTECTION
RESCUE SERVICE
PROTECTIVE INSPECTION
CIVIL DEFENSE
ANIMAL CONTROL
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
SNOW AND ICE REMOVAL
STORM SEWERS
STREET LIGHTING
STREET SIGNS
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
STREET LIGHTS-BILLED
PARK AND RECREATION
TREES AND WEED CONTROL
RECYCLING
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
UNALLOCATED
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
OTHER FINANCING USES
52,723.00
20
34,297.00
4,771.00
4,521.00
13,900.00
126,8/2.0U
96,717.00
10,000.00
38,289.00
50,800.00
54,166.00
21,248.00
45,375.00
31,564.00
17,388.00
8,075.00
2,975.00
0::' , 84,--;-o-u
411,737.00
267,435.00
3 ~38()~0
145,703.00
2,647.00
10,235.00
192,533.00
119,112.00
22,688.00
14,450.00
31,508.00
10,680.00
42,264.00
233,903.00
9,715.00
37,398.00
18,307.00
54 , 7 311 . 0 0
F \
. ~
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
2,336,962.00
_.~ --------
------------
16,159.25
2,026.15
2,608.50
2,705.71
80,:U::>.7o
58,359.16
10,497.75
39,047.00
27,780.16
28,649.44
9 , 04 7--:6 7
33,069.28
18,409.73
12,299.35
3,845.37
660.00
3"4----;-8 og-;-3 1
205,833.76
72,432.64
14,167.43
83,229.72
834.50
5,642.30
110,904.27
35,358.50
1 1 , 161 .37
8,657.58
8,443.55
j-;4T1:TI
24,999.19
101,930.75
5,816.15
19,414.83
10,122.78
27,454.00
41,757.31
1,171,881.35
52
57
42
80
30
39
(4 )
( 1 )
45
47
57
27
4 1
29
52
77
4 I
50
72
56
42
68
44
42
70
50
40
73
68
40
56
40
48
44
48
--
---------- -
------------
49
~-)
CITY OF ANDOVER
YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES
FOR
GENERAL, WATER AND SEWER FUNDS
As 01' 31Ju192
Revised
BUaget
Year to Date
Actua 1
Percentage
Remalnlng
W ATE R FUN D
REV E N U E S
-------------------
-------------------
WATER SALES
METER SALES
PERMIT FEES
MI~~tLLANtuUS REVENUE~
127~154 .45
30,365.00
12,300.00
~S
33
( 5 1 )
(23)
13
191,186.00
20,000.00
10,000.00
12,000.00
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r'~/
I
TITTA~ER FUND REVENUE
233,186.00
180,214.90
22
------------
------------
-------.-----
----------.--
W ATE R FUN D
E X PEN S E S
-------------------
-------------------
SOURCE, STORAGE AND TREATMENT
o I STR IBU nON
ADMINISTRATION
70,674.00
1 OL-;-T9'8 . 00
59,714.00
19,843.06
ljlj,!.>~41
31,656.62
7 1
3!.>
46
TOTAL WATER FUND EXPENSES
233,186.00
118,053.15
49
------------
------------
------------
------------
\
'-~
\
./
CITY OF ANDOVER
YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES
FOR
GENERAL, WATER AND SEWER
A s of 3 1 ~I U 1 92
FUNDS
:1
:1
Revised
Budget
Year to Date
Actua I
Percentage
"ema1 n1 n'J
SEW E R FUN D
R E v-r-N U E :::
~I
",
-------------------
-------------------
SEWER CHARGES
INTEREST
REFUNDS AND REIMBURSEMENTS
TRANSFER FROM SEWER CONN. FUND
396,300.00
2,000.00
199,831.77
2,705.05
49
(35)
:1
'I
:1
'I
'I
r,-)
:1
'I
TOTAL SEWER FUND REVENUE
398,300.00
203,422.69
48
------------
------------
------------
------------
SEW E R FUN D
E X PEN S E S
--------------------
--------------------
COLLECTION
Metropolitan Waste Control
Other' Expenses
ADMINISTRATION
248,242.00
68,498.00
81,560.00
165,496.00
9,740.11
17,966.87
33
85
I 7
IUIAL ot~ER FUND EXPENSES
398,300.00
193,20T:'1f8
b ,
------------
------------
------------
------------
:1
I /-"
:
I
'.J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE August 18, 1992
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Items
........"'.....u<.;I...LUU UJ. rump
~5M House - Waste Disposal
. Engineering Site
Planning
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
~
AP~R
AG '\~
BY:
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY:
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to review the request of Conestoga-
Rovers and Associates (CRA) on behalf of the responsible parties
to construct a pump house on the property known as the Waste
Disposal Engineering (WDE) site. The request is a part of the
cleanup process. The 20' x 40' building will be temporary (2
years maximum) in nature and will be demolished upon completion of
the groundwater cleanup or construction of a permanent building if
further treatment of the groundwater is warranted.
The Council should consider whether a Special Use Permit is
necessary. On July 2, 1991, the City Council granted a Special
Use Permit to Dahl and Associates to construct a block building
for purification and product recovery. The Special Use Permit was
deemed necessary, because the request was considered a public
utility use or structure. Conditions added to the permit insured
the City that:
1. If contaminants were found the City would be notified.
2. The building will be removed from the site within 90 days of
the MPCA final approval.
3. The building shall comply with Ordinance No. 78, the
Commercial Building Construction Ordinance.
At this time, Staff asks for direction from the City Council as to
whether the Special Use Permit is necessary.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
~t:, qJ'
It'
l'
Andover City Council,
Enclosed is an article from the Star and Tribune about a
hag farm in Ramsey that is creating a public nuisance. It is
obvious that the Ramsey City Council does not tolerate the
public nuisance of the smell of pig manure. I am wandering
if the Andover City Council does?
I am currently building a new home at Majestic West of
which I will pay dearly in real estate taxes and now have
found aut just by being there and smelling the air that your
city has a hog operation down the road from us that pollutes
the air so bad I could still smell it on my clothes when I
got home in St. Francis! I will never be able to open the
windows of my new house with that odor in our neighborhood.
This is totally unfair and is an invasion my private right to
breathe clean air.
I have worked on a hog farm that had several hundred
hogs and 't1e did not seem to have such a stench. Wha t
measures of proper waste disposal are being used? That hog
farm may have been there a long time ago, but Andover is now
a city and owes the community a responsibility to allow a
proper city lifestyle. Having a hog operation in the middle
of a city is unacceptable! Those days are over.
On behalf of all the citizens within a 1 mile radius of
that hog farm, please take care of the problem now so we are
not forced to take care of it later.
;;;;;;Joncern,
Gregory J. Deal
/?s
j~ /~ .~ 1f i SU4A<< daA:<- , ? J~~
7'8' I. 5' .~_-? ~ ~J4. _
q/~ d,0~ -:f<-t :ty; .V~ ?
~
SUBURBS
RAMSEY
Pig farm is nuisance;
charges are Possible
A Ramsey hog farmer whose
neighbors have complained of
foul odors faces Possible criminal
charges after his farm was de-
clared a public nuisance Tuesday
by the Ramsey City Council.
The COuncil voted 5-0 that Jake
Barthold's 58-acre farm is a pub-
lic nuisance.
t
a
b
c
(l
aJ
W
BI
01
iu
co
wI
stt
The farm, on Hwy. 47, is across
from the Rum River Boy Scout
Camp.
During a hearing before the vote,
some of the estimated 80 people
there said the smell of pig manure
from Banhold's farm is so nox-
ious that they cannot open their
windows or eat when the wind
blows the scent their way.
Others said the smell was barely
detectable or did not bother them.
Sit
~
cor
dis]
one
diSI
~n
will
mOl
Atil
Cou
aWllJ
WaS'
dispc
Criminal charges of creating a
public nuisance may be filed in
the next 10 days, said City Attor-
ney William Goodrich. The city
also may seek a coun order to
force Banhold to reduce his herd.
Banhold said he would leave
Ramsey if the City Council and
MetrOPOlitan Council agreed to
rezone his land so he can sell it in
2 l'2-acre lots.
-
Pe
V
t;1
Under CUrrent zoning in his area,
lots cannot be smaller than 10
acres.
Ne:
Ede
WOI