Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-26-241685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda November 26, 2024 Andover City Hall Council Chambers 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of Minutes — November 12, 2024, Regular Meeting 4. Public Hearing: Sketch Plan Review for a residential subdivision using a Planned Unit Development (PUD) — Lakeview at Sloth Farms - 13624 Gladiola St NW; PID# 33-32-24- 31-0042 — General Contractors of MN, Inc. (Applicant) 5. Public Hearing: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Amendment for a drive -through use at 2184 Bunker Lake Blvd NW; PID# 34-32-24-31-0154 —The Architects Partnership Ltd. (Applicant) 6. Other Business 7. Adjournment 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes DATE: November 26, 2024 REQUEST The Planning & Zoning Commission is requested to approve the November 12, 2024, regular meeting minutes. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING — NOVEMBER 12, 2024 The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Godfrey on November 12, 2024, 7:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners present: Chairperson Karen Godfrey, Commissioners Scott Hudson, Nick Loehlein, Chuck Naughton, Jon Shafto, Pat Shuman Jr. and Ryan Winge. Commissioners absent: None. Also present: City Planner Peter Hellegers and Associate Planner Aidan Breen 23 PLEDGE OFALLEGIANCE 24 25 APPROVAL OFMINUTES 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 October 8, 2024, Regular Meeting The consensus of the Commission was for approval of the minutes from the October 8, 2024, Planning Commission Meeting as presented. Motion carried on a 6-ayes, 1-present (Naughton), 0-nays vote. PUBLIC HEARING. Consider Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Meadows East — Unaddressed Property 16 = Ward Lake Drive NW; PID# 11-32-2441-0003 — SW Wold Construction, Inc. (Applicant). City Planner Peter Hellegers stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review a Conditional Use Permit (CUP)/Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Hartmans Meadows (formerly known as Meadows East. The proposal contains 15 rural residential lots. The request is by SW Wold Construction Inc. The applicant previously provided a Sketch Plan which was reviewed by the Andover Park and Recreation Commission on July 18, 2024, the Planning and Zoning Commission on July 23, 2024, and the City Council on August 8, 2024. Based on that feedback the applicant is now proposing a development of 15 units over 33.7 acres. The current PUD request was reviewed by the Andover Park and Recreation Commission on November 7, 2024. Mr. Hellegers reviewed items from the staff report, noting that the PUD involves some deviations from City Code including lots ranging from 1.5 to 2.56 acres where 2.5 acres is the minimum and lot widths of 130- 336 feet where the minimum is 300. According to City Code 13-3: Planned Unit Development, the purpose of a PUD is to encourage more efficient allocation of density and intensity of land use where such arrangement is desirable and feasible by providing the means of greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design than provided under strict application of the standards set in code. City Code 13-3-9 regulates the findings that are required for a PUD to be approved and 13-3-11 identifies desirable PUD design standards that are sought in any PUD proposal. As part of the PUD Narrative, the 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2024 Page 2 applicant addresses the design qualities they believe the city seeks when granting a PUD proposal as identified in City Code 13-3-11. Those findings and the applicants' narrative with responses to those findings is included in the staff report packet that is before the Planning Commission. Mr. Hellegers reviewed items from the staff report packet: Street Improvements As part of the PUD request, the applicant is asking for flexibility with street construction standards. The city standards and PUD proposal are as follows: City Standard PUD Proposal Right of Way width 60 feet 50 feet Rural Street Pavement Width 31 feet 28 feet Rural Street Pavement Width including curb (no ditches) 31 feet 31 feet City staff supports the proposal for a 50-foot right of way. This still allows enough space for snow and storm water storage. There will be additional dedicated drainage and utility easements outside the right of way. This proposal is consistent with what has been conducted in the Petersen Farms development. This would provide a 20-foot front yard drainage and utility easement. Staff supports the proposed 28-foot pavement width and 18-inch ribbon curb on each side of the road. This allows for parking on both sides. The applicant is proposing a 31-foot width which includes 18 inches of ribbon curbing on each side. The 18 inches of concrete ribbon curbing on each side of the street will maximize the protection of the edge of paved surface from the wear and tear of vehicle parking and snow removal. Since storm water will be treated within the ditch area, the ribbon curb will allow the flow of water into the ditches yet support the edging of the paved area. Lot Standards Lot standards in the RI -Single Family Rural district require 2.5 acre lots with a 300-foot lot width at the front yard setback. The PUD proposes lot sizes ranging from 1.52 — 2.56 acres and widths ranging from 120- 336 feet. Each lot will exceed the minimum requirement of 8,600 square feet of buildable area. The standard R-1 requirement allows for 3,600 square feet for a home location and 5,000 square foot locations for septic systems. Each of the lots will be served by individual septic systems and wells. City Code Requirements PUD Proposal Lot size/Gross Density 2.5 acres/0.4 units per acre 1.5 — 2.56 acres/.44 units per acre Lot Width 300 feet 130 — 336 feet Lot Depth 150 feet 150 feet 2.5 acres/33.7 acres 13.48 15 proposed Each lot will exceed the minimum requirement of 8,600 square feet of buildable area. The standard R-1 requirement allows for 3,600 square feet for a home location and 5,000 square foot locations for septic systems. Mr. Hellegers reviewed the conformance with Local and Regional Plans and Ordinances. The Site Characteristics were reviewed in detail including access, block length, zoning and lot size, utilities, tree preservation plan, and wetlands/floodplains. The sketch plan and proposed PUD were shown. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —November 12, 2024 Page 3 Mr. Hellegers reviewed the Interagency Coordination including Coordination with other Agencies and Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization. The process includes the Andover Review Committee, public notice, Park and Trail Dedication, and PUD. PUD Review — the following City Code standards for PUD Review that the proposed development would need to address at the Preliminary Plat/PUD review stage include: Applicable Ordinances. City Code 13-3-9 regulates the findings that are required for a PUD to be approved: 1. The proposed development is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan for the City. 2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. 3. The proposed development demonstrates how each modified or waived requirement contributes to achieving the purpose of PUD. City Code 13-3-11 identifies Desirable PUD Design Qualities that are sought in any PUD proposal as listed below: A. Achieves efficiency in the provision of streets and utilities and preserves area to achieve the elements of design qualities described in this Chapter. — The development is proposed to be a low impact development with use of ribbon curb and ditching. B. Provides convenient and safe access for vehicles and pedestrians and all types of activity that are anticipated to be a part of the proposed development. The location to Ward Lake Drive will be designed to meet city requirements. The extension of Sycamore Street NW will provide a secondary access to Deerwood Estates. C. Provides a buffer between different uses, adjacent properties, roadways, between backyards of back-to-back lots. The applicant is proposing to add additional tree buffer from the railroad tracks. The applicant is proposing lots of 2.5 acres on the north, south and east side to blend into the rural development. D. Preserves existing stands of trees and/or significant trees. The applicant is proposing to preserve a 50-foot conservation easement along the southern edge of the property to preserve trees. E. Provide considerable landscaping treatments that complement the overall design and contribute toward an overall landscaping theme. The applicant is proposing to add additional trees greater than City Code requirements. The proposed tree variates proposed are acceptable to the Cityof Andover. F. Preserves significant usable space on individual lots or through the provision of open space within the development. The minimum size lot is 1.5 acres. The property does not have wetlands according to the Nation Wetland Inventory and the Wetland specialist that reviewed the property. G. Provides an attractive streetscape using undulating topography, landscaping, decorative street lighting, decorative mailbox groupings, retaining walls, boulders, fencing, area identification signs, etc. The applicant is proposing several trees in the front yards of the properties. The road will be designed in a manner to take advantage of the existing topography. H. The proposed structures within the development demonstrate quality architectural design and the use of high -quality building materials for unique design and detailing. The HOA will be responsible for approving design considerations prior to construction of each new home. Minimum house sizes will be 1,600 for ramblers and 2,000 square feet for two -stories, with a minimum garage size of 720 square feet. Roof pitches will be 7:12 or greater. The exterior will be finished with maintenance free siding and a minimum of 150 square feet of stone or rock on the front. Mr. Hellegers reviewed the proposed conceptual PUD standards comparing the City Code Requirements and the PUD Proposal. The Planning Commission is asked to hold a public hearing, take public feedback on the proposed CUP for a PUD and provide a recommendation to the City Council. In addition to the staff report and city codes, other items included for the Commission review were: a draft resolution of approval, draft resolution of denial, location map, Comprehensive Plan goals, applicants responses to City questions dated October 2, 2024, City Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —November 12, 2024 Page 4 1 Council meeting minutes from Sketch Plan review dated August 7, 2024, Planning and Zoning Commission 2 meeting minutes from Sketch Plan review dated July 23, 2024, Park and Recreation Commission Meeting 3 Minutes from Sketch Plan review dated July 18, 2024, the applicant's PUD Narrative, and PUD plan layout. 4 5 Commissioner ShaBo asked when Ward Lake Drive will be upgraded. Mr. Hellegers stated it is planned for 6 2030. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Chair Godfrey opened the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. Mr. Dean Marquette, 727 170' Lane NW, just off Ward Lake Drive, would like to stay with the 2%z acre minimum lot sizes. He does not see a need to add more roofs to the area as there are plenty of new roofs being added off Prairie Road. He does not want to saturate the density with small lot sizes. There are no walking or bike paths, and it is dangerous on Ward Lake Drive. There are no parks or playgrounds in that area. He proposed keeping it at 2'h acre lots with 13 properties maximum. Ms. Elizabeth Foerg, 16527 Sycamore Street NW, is thankful the lot sizes are getting closer as to what they should be. They did not receive any notification of this meeting. A street is being put through their block which will increase the traffic in the neighborhood. She does not think there is any reason to increase the density in this area. This is the reason she moved there for 2%z acre lots. She does not want the density increased, more septic and sewer than the property can handle. A 1'/a lot is not large enough for a septic system. She wants to leave their area untouched. Mr. Jeff Sims, 16526 Sycamore Street NW, asked staff about the zoning and how a proposal for 15 lots is before us. There should only be 13 lots all 2%z acres per City Code. Mr. Josh Delich, 17265 Ward Lake Drive, engaged in the building process with the City when building his home. There are codes and compliances that are applied when new homes are being built. He hopes the standards are continued to be maintained regarding building. There are family changes with younger kids in the neighborhood, there are safety concerns. He is concerned with the speed of traffic. He asked the Commission to adhere to the 2%: acre lots. Mr. Craig Wensmann, Bogart Peterson, Civil Engineers/Surveyors, Applicant, stated the developer was receptive to the comments from the last meetings. For a 40-acre parcel that would be 16 units with 2%x acre lots. The County has the parcel mapped as 33.7 acres. The fee title is not represented properly, the actual parcel size is 38.2 acres with 15 lots at 2%z acres. Mr. Wensmann stated his is the reason that the 15 lots were determined. Ms. Elizabeth Foerg, 16527 Sycamore Street NW stated she is interested in hearing how they came up with 1 %: acres vs 2%: acres. It should be 2%z acres per lot. Mr. Joel Anderson, 16622 Sycamore Street NW, moved into their house in 2002. There was a sign on the cul-de-sac stating this is a temporary cul-de-sac. They knew at some time they would be adding on. They moved into that area because the lots were 2 %z acres. He would like to see all lots at 2 %a acres. Mr. Hellegers stated one comment was received via email from Mr. Dan Hefmder, 17011 Ward Lake Drive. They would like to see 2'/a acre lots. He suggested a park with a playground be constructed. Bike and walking paths are also requested. The wooded area should remain as a buffer. Trees on Ward Lake Blvd should remain. Chair Godfrey closed the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. Mr. Hellegers stated the public hearing notices were sent to properties within 700 feet of the subject parcel. Signs for the public hearing were installed and the notice was also in the newspaper. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —November 12, 2024 Page 5 Commissioner Loehlein asked Mr. Hellegers about Mr. Wensmann's math which does not agree with the City's pertaining to size and number of lots. Mr. Hellegers stated Staff looks at it based on the acreage from the survey and how that is going to be calculated out. Mr. Wensmann referred to different acreage. Staff looks at the overall acreage presented to calculate the number and size of lots. Commissioner Loehlein asked if there is a consistent methodology used. Mr. Hellegers stated they consider the overall acreage rather than the net acreage. Mr. Wensmann, the applicant, stated he agrees with the comment of being consistent across the City. Typically looking at it from a survey side when a development comes in on the overall boundary of the property based on fee title. As part of the process the roadways and easements are dedicated to the City. They started with the net property to the center of the road. The precedent has been set by the City to use the gross area to determine the lot count. They could look at this more closely with City Staff. The next step is the preliminary plat, and those areas could be verified. Adding 15 more taxpayers to the tax base may get Ward Lake Road done sooner. The cost of the homes will be $750,000. Chair Godfrey asked about the lot width and the Code says 300 feet measured at the setbacks. Godfrey asked if the proposed 130 feet is from the street and not the setback. Mr. Wensmann stated that 130 feet width is measured from the setback line. Commissioner Winge asked about the right-of-way and City Code has it at 60 feet and the proposal is 50 feet. Mr. Wensmann stated they provide a narrower roadway to reduce the imperviousness. A larger easement is used to allow the 80-foot corridor for utilities. Chair Godfrey asked about Ward Lake Road and what type of road that is and who determines when it will be updated. Mr. Hellegers stated he believes it is a residential road so the City would determine when it will be updated. The 2030 upgrade is per the City's plan. Commissioner Winge asked what the standard lot width has been typically in the recent developments. Mr. Hellegers stated for Peterson Farms there were the same type of issues. There is similar type of design and roadway and is a decent comparison. Commissioner Shuman asked Mr. Wensmann for his perspective on the purpose of the PUD. He read the purpose of the PUD aloud. Mr. Wensmann stated the intent is to provide a better -quality development by using lower impact standards. They are able to reduce the length of roads, reduce stormwater runoff, and more trees are preserved with the PUD flexibilities to meet the Code. Commissioner Shuman asked if the Code was adhered to would that change the lots. The main driver is road length. Commissioner Shafto stated he appreciates the developer coming back and taking the Commission's input. We are really close. He stated it is difficult to put in a park and justify the maintenance cost for a small development. The Parks Commission recommended taking cash in lieu of land for park dedication. He is concerned about the road and noted it is not in good shape. This development only has Ward Lake Drive as an access. He would like to see 13-14 lots and possibly 15 lots. The road needs to be addressed now. Commissioner Loehlein stated he appreciates the comments from the public and respects the desire to stay with a 2.5-acre minimum. He is struggling with the "math" used to calculate the number of lots. If it was clear cut that would be less desirable. He does not support the proposal. Commissioner Hudson stated he would like this to be 13 lots, but a revised plan could remove all trees, build the road wider, and have a cookie cutter design that would not be desirable. Fifteen is much better than the 21 originally proposed. Two houses are affected. Commissioner Naughton stated there would be 7 lots at 1.5 acres. We should not support the cookie cutter approach and that would be wrong for the area. A lot of the charm of the area would be lost. Parks and walking trails should be addressed to the Park Commission. A park would not normally go into a small 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —November 12, 2024 Page 6 development as many properties would have on -site play structures. He thanked the residents for their comments. Chair Godfrey stated this is one step in a very long process. Motion by Loehlein, seconded by Shuman, to recommend the City Council deny the Conditional Use Permit / Planned Unit Development for Meadows East — Unaddressed Property 16xxx Ward Lake Drive NW PID 11-32-24-41-0003 - SW Weld Construction Inc (Applicant) on the basis the applicant has not demonstrated compliance with City Code with the increased density. Motion carried on a 5-ayes, 2-nays (Godfrey and Hudson) vote. Staff is requested to create the resolution with the reasons for denial. PUBLIC HEARING. Consider Interim Use Permit (IUP) Request —Mining & Land Reclamation — 83 Old Constance Blvd NW; PID# 13-32-24-11-0004 — Chris Hogie & Katelyn Kiekbusch (Applicants). Associate Planner Aidan Breen reviewed the request, noting that the applicants are looking to construct a driveway to their property for an accessory structure and future home at 83 Old Constance Blvd NW. This process falls under the land reclamation application, which is an IUP. Since the applicant is proposing land reclamation utilizing in excess of 400 cubic yards, an IUP is required pursuant to City Code 12-13-1 and 12-15-8. Staff is proposing a completion date of November 19, 2025 (5 years is the longest amount of time an IUP can be granted under City Code 12-14-12-E). If at that time, the applicant has not completed the work identified with the driveway -grading plan the applicant will need to obtain the IUP again. The applicant is required to provide a hard -surfaced driveway apron in the right-of-way. The current proposed plan calls for a 25-foot asphalt section while the applicant has indicated they plan to pave as far as their budget will allow. Flood Plain Impacts — as part of this driveway project, the applicant is proposing to fill 205 cubic yards of the flood plain. In order to fill the flood plain the applicant is required to "create floodplain" at a 1 to 1 ratio. The applicant is proposing to construct a pond as shown on the driveway -grading plan located in the northeastern portion of the property. This proposed pond is the flood plain mitigation required and meets or exceeds the 1 to 1 ratio for replacement and will provide 213 cubic yards of flood storage. Wetland Impacts —The proposed wetland impacts are 4,272 square feet. Coon Creek Watershed has indicated that this falls under the de minimis amount of 0.1 acres. The applicant currently has conditional approval for a CCWD permit but has not yet received a permit. Type of Fill Permitted — The applicant is expecting to have fill material suitable for the driveway delivered to the property during business hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Haul Route — No haul route is required, as material will be delivered to, and within the site. The property will have one entrance for delivery of materials. Erosion Control — Silt fencing will be required around the area until vegetation has occurred to control any erosion. The applicant will be required to ensure proper vegetation across disturbed areas within 7 days of inactivity. Coordination with other Agencies — The applicant is responsible for obtaining all appropriate and necessary permits. The applicant has been working with the City Engineering Department and Coon Creek Watershed District. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —November 12, 2024 Page 7 Interim Use Permit Standards — The Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend an interim use permit, and the Council shall issue such interim use permit only if it finds that such use at the proposed location will not create an excess burden on parks, streets, and other public facilities. The proposed project will not create an excess burden on parks or other public facilities. While material will be delivered to the site the road is expected to handle the traffic. Will not be injurious to the surrounding neighborhood or otherwise harm the public health, safety, and general welfare. The applicant shall establish vegetation and ensure proper erosion control to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The applicant is required to observe all noise and similar type of regulations during operation. Will not have a negative effect on the values of property and scenic views. The driveway will be permanent and will facilitate future development of the site for a single-family home and accessory structure. Will not impose additional unreasonable costs on the public. The applicant is required to obtain all necessary permits. Any material that falls outside of the property line or right-of-way is the responsibility of the applicant to remove. The Draft Resolution of Approval, Draft Resolution of Denial, Site Location Map, Review #2 Staff Comments and Proposed Grading Plan were provided for Commission review. The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the interim use permit request. This item will come before the City Council on November19,2024. Commissioner Hudson asked about driveway width and length discussed last month and is that applicable to this situation. The driveway length is over 300 feet. The driveway width and length fall under the current recommendations. Mr. Hellegers stated the City Council decided not to continue with that proposed Code language, but the guidance is 12 feet wide for driveways. Chair Godfrey asked what the approximate duration of this construction will be. Mr. Breen stated he does not know but it needs to be completed by November 19, 2025. She asked what consideration has been given for parking for construction vehicles during construction. Chair Godfrey opened the public hearing at 8:01 p.m. Mr. Chris Hogie, applicant, 19296 109th Avenue SE, Big Lake, the construction vehicles will be parked on the first portion of the driveway when it is completed (200 feet). The driveway length will be approximately 600 feet from the road to the house. There will be some construction equipment that might be parked on the road on the shoulder for the first portion of the driveway construction. It should not create a burden on Old Constance Blvd. They will follow the silt fencing, vegetation, and erosion control which is included in their plans. Coon Creek Watershed has given their approval. They started the process in March and closed on the property in August. Chair Godfrey asked what the estimated time of construction is and Mr. Hogie stated they would like to get the middle portion over the wetlands completed by the end of 2024 before it gets too cold or wet. The driveway will be constructed by Spring 2025. The accessory structure will be constructed prior to the home construction and will be used for storage. They plan to have everything done by November 2025. Mr. Breen stated one public comment was received via email from James and Deborah Berry at 43 Old Constance Blvd NW stated they have no issues with the plan for the driveway or the accessory structure. Ms. Sandie Rundle, 198 Old Constance Blvd. NW, stated she just heard about this. She asked what kind of company will be brought into the property. She heard it was for a construction company. She has lived in her home for 40+ years. Chair Godfrey stated this request is for the construction of the driveway. Mr. Chris Hogie applicant, 19296 109'h Avenue SE, Big Lake, stated this will be their residential home with no business involved. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2024 Page 8 Chair Godfrey closed the public hearing at 8:14 p.m. Motion by Hudson, seconded by Loehlein, to recommend the City Council approve an interim use permit for mining and land reclamation 83 Old Constance Blvd NW at PID 13-32-24-11-0004 — Chris Hogie & Katelyn Kiekbusch (Applicants). Motion carried on a 7-ayes, 0-nays vote. This will go before the City Council at their November 19 meeting. PUBLIC HEARING. Consider Interim Use Permit allP Request — Construction of an Accessory Structure Prior to Principal Structure — 83 Old Constance Blvd NW, PID# 13-32-24-11-0004 — Chris Hogie & %atelyn Kiekbusch (Applicants). Mr. Breen reviewed the request, noting the applicants are looking to construct an accessory structure prior to their principal structure at 83 Old Constance Blvd NW. The property is zoned R-1 — Single Family Rural Residential. This process falls under an IUP. The applicant desires to construct a 50-foot by 80-foot steel building with a sidewall height of 16 feet. This is covered under Title 12 Chapter 6 regulations concerning Accessory Structures and Temporary Structures. The applicant's site layout shows the accessory structure and proposed home location. This would place the accessory structure behind the proposed home (constructed later). The accessory structure would meet the setbacks as proposed. Setback Required Proposed Front Yard 60 feet Approximately 820 Side Yard 5 feet 10 feet Rear 5 feet 280+ feet City Code would allow for an existing accessory structure to remain without a principal structure for 12 months with an IUP. The applicant has acknowledged a 12-month time period to construct their home. If at that time, the applicant has not constructed their home, the accessory structure would need to be removed from the property or seek another IUP. The applicant is aware. the new home will need to be as tall as or taller than the accessory structure. The applicant has been made aware that City Code 12-9: Home Occupations, restricts the use of the accessory structure for residential purposes only. No commercial or business -related activity is permitted within the structure. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend an interim use permit and the Council shall issue such interim use permit only if it finds that such use at the proposed location will not create an excess burden on parks, streets, and other public facilities; will not be injurious to the surrounding neighborhood or otherwise harm the public health, safety, and general welfare; will not have a negative effect on the values of property and scenic views; and will not impose additional unreasonable costs on the public. Also provided for Commission review were Draft Resolution of Approval, Draft Resolution of Denial, Site Location Map, Proposed Grading Plan and Proposed Building. The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the interim use permit request. Chair Godfrey opened the public hearing at 8:19 p.m. Mr. Chris Hogie applicant, 19296 109' Avenue SE, Big Lake, stated this accessory building will be done prior to the main structure. They currently have two homes, and they are trying to consolidate into one Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2024 Page 9 1 home. They need a place to put all their belongings after their house sells rather than renting a commercial 2 storage facility. 3 4 Commissioner Loehlein asked if his intent was to have any commercial business and Mr. Hogie stated it is 5 only for residential use. 6 7 Commissioner Hudson stated Mr. Hogie has 1 year from the date of approval to complete construction and 8 Mr. Hogie stated he understands he has until November 19, 2025, for completion of all. Mr. Hogie stated he 9 had hoped to have this already done. They have gone through many hoops to get to this point. 10 11 Mr. Breen stated one public comment was received via email from James and Deborah Berry at 43 Old 12 Constance Blvd NW stating they have no issues with the plan of the accessory structure. 13 14 Chair Godfrey closed the public hearing at 8:26 p.m. 15 16 Motion by Shafto, seconded by Naughton, to recommend the City Council approve the interim use permit 17 for construction of an accessory structure prior to the principal structure at PID 13-32-24-11-0004 — Chris 18 Hogie & Katelyn Kiekbusch (Applicants). Motion carried on a 7-ayes, 0-nays vote. 19 20 This will come before the City Council at their November 19, 2024, meeting. 21 22 PUBLICHEARING. Consider an amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) —Incorporate 23 new Uses — unaddressed property located at Bunker Lake Blvd NW and Tfi Avenue NW; PID# 30-32-24- 24 43-0072 — Colliers Engineering and Design. (Applicants) 25 26 Mr. Hellegers reviewed the request, noting Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review a 27 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for an Amendment to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to amend the 28 commercial uses for the property at Andover Crossings. 29 30 On December 28, 2021, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the Planned Unit Development 31 be approved by the City Council, and on January 4, 2022, the City Council approved the PUD for this 32 project. A plat was approved for the development known as Andover Crossings, and Commercial Site Plans 33 were approved for the apartment building and senior building on the east side of Inca Street NW and for the 34 Taco Bell located just north of the site. While the subject property was included as part of the PUD, it was 35 left as "Outlot A" on the Plan and thus requires the outlot to be platted prior to development. Currently, the 36 staff is reviewing the Commercial Site Plan, the request for the Preliminary Plat and a CUP for an 37 automobile service station are on the agenda. 38 39 The subject property is located at the northeast quadrant of Th Avenue NW and Bunker Lake Blvd NW. Mr. 40 Hellegers indicated the location on a map. The property is currently guided for Neighborhood Commercial 41 and zoned NB: Neighborhood Business. 42 43 The proposed amendment to the PUD layout provides the following: 44 • Elimination of .92-acre restaurant with drive-thru use. 45 • Replaces the .92-acre restaurant/drive-thm use with 2.0-acre automobile service station use (use 46 requires separate CUP). 47 • Elimination of 2.75-acre (22,500 sf) retail use. 48 • Replaces the 2.75-acre retail use with 1.71-acre retail use. 49 • Elimination of 1.19-acre (8,400) retail use. 50 • Replaces the 1.19-acre retail use with 1.15-acre retail use with drive-thru (separate CUP required). 51 • The three commercial uses in this proposal would also utilize a shared access easement to allow 52 flow between the commercial properties and access points. 53 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2024 Page 10 Mr. Hellegers reviewed Trees/Landscape, Utilities, and Signage. The PUD criteria was also reviewed. The City Code 13-3-9 states the following required findings for the Council to consider when approving a PUD. 1. The proposed development is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan for the City. 2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. 3. The proposed development demonstrates how each modified or waived requirement contributes to achieving the purpose of PUD. 4. The PUD is of composition and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation are feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. The City Council will need to determine if the developer's proposal satisfactorily meets these required findings. The proposed PUD Standards were reviewed including Zoning and Lot Standards, Parking, Shared Access & Private Streets, Other Standards, and Owner's Association. Also provided for Commission review were Draft Resolution of Approval, Draft Resolution of Denial, City Code 13-3 Planned Unit Development, Location Map, Applicant's Narrative and Overall PUD Site Plan. The Planning Commission is requested to hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council for their consideration on November 19, 2024. Chair Godfrey asked if this is still falling under the neighborhood business district and all of the requirements and Mr. Hellegers confirmed it is. Commissioner Loehlein asked if this master plan was approved but this is just a change in design and Mr. Hellegers confirmed that is correct. The standards have not changed. Users are not yet identified for the other businesses other than the automobile service center. Commissioner Hudson asked when the retail businesses are identified for the other lots will this come back before the Planning Commission. Mr. Hellegers stated potentially, if a Conditional Use Permit is required, it will come back to the Planning Commission. Chair Godfrey opened the public hearing at 8:35 p.m. Mr. Hellegers noted there were some people on Zoom but due to audio problems, they cannot be heard. Mr. Kasner Sturm, representing Circle K at 6000 Clearwater Drive, Hopkins, MN, stated they are putting in a Holiday Station Store with gas and a convenience store. He is the development manager for this project. He has engineering staff available via phone for any questions he cannot answer. Chair Godfrey closed the public hearing at 8:37 p.m. Mr. Hellegers noted there were no emails or correspondence on this issue. Motion by Hudson, seconded by Loehlein, to recommend the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit / Planned Unit Development requested Colliers Engineering for Andover Crossings PID 30-32-24- 43-0072. Motion carried on a 7-ayes, 0-nays vote. PUBLIC HEARING. Consider a Preliminary Plat —Andover Crossings II— unaddressed property located at Bunker Lake Blvd NW and 7h Avenue NW; PID #30-32-24-43-0072 — Colliers Engineering and Design (Applicants). 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2024 Page 11 Mr. Hellegers reviewed the request, noting the Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review a Preliminary Plat for the undeveloped property at the northeast corner of 7a' Avenue NW and Bunker Lake Boulevard. This property was left as Outlet A in the Andover Crossings plat, so the property needs to be platted prior to being developed. Mr. Hellegers indicated the access points for the lots. Public street access to development would be provided from Inca Street NW and from a northbound right -tam shared access drive that runs between the Taco Bell site and the northern edge of the site. Mr. Hellegers reviewed Street Access, Sewer and Water Access, Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization, Coordination with other Agencies, Tree Preservation/Landscaping, Park and Recreation Commission Recommendation and proposed lots. City Lot Lott Lot Requirement Lot Area .52 acres 2.0 acres 1.7 acres 1.2 acres Lot Width 150 ft 330 It 180 ft 170 ft Lot Depth 150 ft 260 It 440 ft 295 ft The Commission is requested to hold a Public Hearing and make a recommendation on the proposed Preliminary Plat to the City Council for their consideration on November 19, 2024. Also provided for Commission consideration were a draft resolution of approval, draft resolution of denial, location map, staff review comments and Preliminary Plat plans. Chair Godfrey opened the public hearing at 8:43 p.m. Chair Godfrey closed the public hearing at 8:44 p.m. Motion by Shuman, seconded by Shafto, to recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat of Andover Crossings II — unaddressed property located at Bunker Lake Blvd NW and 71' Avenue NW PID 30- 32-24-43-0072 — Colliers Engineering and Design (Applicants). Motion carried on a 7-ayes, 0-nays vote. PUBLICHEARING. Consider a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) —Automobile Service Station /Bulk Fuel Storage /Exterior Storage — unaddressed property located at Bunker Lake Blvd NW and 7Avenue NW; PID# 30-32-24-43-0072 — Colliers Engineering and Design (Applicants). Mr. Hellegers reviewed the request, noting that the Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for an Automobile Service Station with bulk fuel storage and exterior storage, for the property located in the northeast quadrant of Th Avenue NW and Bunker Lake Blvd. NW. The subject property is currently guided for Neighborhood Commercial and zoned Neighborhood Business. Mr. Hellegers indicated the location on a map. Parking — Parking for commercial uses varies depending on the use within the structure. Currently the applicant is providing two parking stalls at each of the eight pumps (2/service stall) plus 1 parking stall per 200 square feet of floor area for the retail/convenience store building. Parking is reviewed in commercial areas as each use obtains a permit for the building. City RequirementPronosed Site Required Proposed Stalls Stalls Fuel Pumps 2/service stall 8 service stalls 16 Retail Store 1/200 sf floor area 5,200 sf floor area 26 Mr. Hellegers reviewed plan elements from the staff report including parking, building setbacks, building exterior, trash enclosure, rooftop mechanical equipment, traffic circulation, liquid storage tank, hours of operation, lighting, exterior storage and sales, landscaping, and signage. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2024 Page 12 Also included for Commission review were draft resolution of approval, draft resolution of denial, location map, City Codes 12-12-2, 12-12-4, 12-14-3, and 12-14-5, applicants' narrative, Staff Review Comments and Preliminary Site Plan set / elevations. Commissioner Hudson referred to the Site Plan and asked if at that third access point there would be a temporary road to use that access point. Mr. Hellegers showed the third access point on a map and noted where the pavement will stop. It could either be paved to that access point or fenced off. There would likely be a plan to pave that to facilitate trash removal. Chair Godfrey asked if the convenience store would only have have propane cylinders for exchange in the cage outside. Mr. Hellegers stated that is correct propane cylinders would just be in the cage for exchange, there would not be an exterior tank for propane filling. Chair Godfrey opened the public hearing at 8:53 p.m. No comments were received prior to the public hearing. Chair Godfrey closed the public hearing at 8:54 p.m. Motion by Loehlein, seconded by Hudson, to recommend the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit — Automobile Service Station / Bulk Fuel Storage / Exterior Storage — unaddressed property located at Bunker Lake Blvd NW and 7th Avenue NW PID#30-32-24-43-0072 — Colliers Engineering and Design. Motion carried on a 6-ayes, 1-nay (Winge) vote. This will come before the City Council on November 19, 2024. OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Hellegers stated two items from the Planning Commission meeting on October 8, 2024, went before the City Council and were approved. The code amendment item on driveway minimums was not approved, that was directed to be guidance. Commissioner Winge asked staff if there was an update on the AT&T antenna. Mr. Hellegers stated some information has been received from AT&T stating they are interested in changing out some antennas at a different location. AT&T is planning to come back with a new application for the water tower site. Chair Godfrey congratulated Commission Shafto on winning the election for City Councilmember. ADJOURNMENT Chair Godfrey adjourned the meeting at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Debbie Wolfe, Recording Secretary Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Joe Janish, Community Development Director SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Sketch Plan/Conditional Use Permit (CUP)/Planned Unit Development (PUD) Review —Lakeview at Sloth Farm DATE: November 26, 2024 INTRODUCTION The Planning Commission is asked to review a sketch plan for a single-family PUD residential development as proposed by Doug Schultz/General Contractors of MN Inc. The applicant submitted a narrative for the proposed Sketch Plan which is attached for your review. What is a Sketch Plan / PUD Concept Plan? A Sketch Plan / PUD Concept Plan is used to provide feedback to the developer through Andover Review Committee (ARC), Planning and Zoning Commission, Park and Recreation Commission, and City Council but formal action is not taken at this stage. The intent of the Sketch Plan process is to view the concept plan for a proposed development and to discuss big picture concerns or areas of consistency with code. An applicant would need to develop detailed plans that address the concerns prior to their application for Preliminary Plat and PUD. Purpose of PUD? The purpose of a PUD is to encourage more efficient allocation of density and intensity of land use where such arrangement is desirable and feasible by providing the means for greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design than provided under the strict application of this code. It must be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City Council that a higher quality development will result than could otherwise be achieved through strict application of this code. PROJECT SUMMARY The City has received an application for a sketch plan showing a 7-lot single-family development. The site is located at the southwest corner of Bunker Lake Boulevard and Gladiola Street NW, just east of the boat landing on Crooked Lake. The property falls within the shoreland district. ��r� 4y�riir Figure -Aerial photo DISCUSSION This section will review some of the site characteristics and processes for the proposed development shown on the sketch plan. For this concept to move forward, several actions would need to occur including: • Preliminary Plat • Conditional Use Permit /Planned Unit Development (CUP/PUD) • Final Plat • Building permits GENERAL Conformance with Local and Regional Plans and Ordinances 1. The 2.4-acre property (33-32-24-31-0042) is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary. 2. The property is guided in the 2018 Comprehensive Plan as URML Urban Residential Medium Low, a designation that calls for densities of 4 to 8 units per acre. The proposed 7-lot development does not currently meet the 4 units per acre (minimum net density) as it shows 3.65 units per acre net density. 3. The property is within the Shoreland Overlay District. 4. The proposed development includes deviations from City Codes that are proposed to be addressed through the PUD process. 2 Zoning 7T R-4: Single Family Urban Residential Figure 2 - Zoning and FLU Maps Future Land Use M i: Net Residential Density Range by Land Use Land Use Density Range Net Devel Acres VIILVNq R«q«MILOw IbLUNY q•Rm JH9 {RYL'LYWn RnlgrtlYYMu•n LewOb•unlh q•«n JpL unite qr «h b l - IRK-40•n Rwwq«CY MYY Lem 1]le'AUM p«Ltw YL - UIY-WM ReOYwn`I Mlyl Ato MYYY p«Lm 100 SITE CHARACTERISTICS Access The proposed sketch plan shows driveway access to Gladiola Street NW. Gladiola Street NW is an existing street. Figure - Access ]es 8 i �J rEFfi- F L 3 Utilities Each of the lots will be served by municipal services. The Engineering department has provided the following in regards to comments to achieve municipal services: City water main and sanitary sewer are only available for a portion of this parcel. Refer to marked up plan (applicant was provided marked up plan). There are two existing 4" sanitary sewer stubs near Lots 5 and 6 to this parcel and no water main stubs. An existing 8" water main is located under the easterly portion of Gladiola Street that would need to be connected to with 1 " water services for each parcel. An 8" sanitary sewer pipe would need to be extended in Gladiola Street from the existing sanitary manhole north to the middle of Lot 1. Based upon the current layout, this new sanitary sewer line would include 4 - 4" service stubs with one new 4 " stub connecting into the existing 8" sanitary sewer pipe. Due to the disturbance required with the utility connections, the existing street section would need to be removed and replaced from the southerly removal limits for utilities to the new northerly sanitary sewer manhole. ' I O J n p $j Figure — Utilities Redline Plan Provided to applicant. Shoreland Management Crooked Lake is near this development and is classified as a General Development Lake. This places the property within 1,000 feet of the Crooked Lake within a Shoreland Overlay District. The applicant has provided a "PUD Development Plan Shoreland Density" map. As part of the Shoreland Ordinance, the applicant is required to verify the proposed density by creating a tier 0 system of 267 feet. Density is then compared to City Code within these tiers. The Shoreland Ordinance also allows for a density increase if a developer provides a larger setback (125 feet vs. 100 feet from the waterbody Ordinary High Water (OHW)) and placing vegetation requirements around the recreational lake. The applicant is not seeking additional density, as the chart below shows they are allowed 7.2 units and they are proposing 7 units. -- BUVYE6 LaxF 6bAFVAip NW IC.6116) TI@ E �� s — .—_ , 7 CYM.ED LME LLLIII �1 f oenalty Data T.dTin Mw (Sit n.) �Mw (sit y1.) hN (s4 ml I''L�• sa>< fcc.a)(e nTN, kP7 Daet� (I len) FN^uJ 4a1e ".111 p eD.T'� tI.WJ ea Op f 2 U.. a 1}m nA00 1.] x♦ ] rcy 1p4.1p ] 1a5..1a D.w • Strircly. 11. 1. I Pe GIW mun ee v11nn sp4 P.len mP me ..m+a. tn. r^va• � m. iWewi w�1 a�avrt w`.wl�..q.rmrm � P..W. • M. vkarl b P�Imme26S P^.1^ mm ms a MYr'u� ,vMas PUD Development Plan Shoreland Density WCEVIEW AT SLOTH FAR Due to the Shoreland Overlay District and seeking a PUD, additional responsibilities are required of the developer. These include a Mandatory Home Owners Association (HOA) and City code provides requirements of the HOA. e Residential Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) within a shoreland area requires a property owner association agreement (for residential PUDs) with mandatory membership, and addresses the following within City Code 13-4-9 F: 1. Maintenance and Design Criteria; Each home will incorporate high -quality materials and architectural features that reflect the character of the area. The homeowners association will ensure maintenance and use guidelines. 2. Open Space Requirements: Planned Unit Developments must contain open space; The development will include common areas and landscaping. Existing trees will be preserved for screening and privacy. 3. Erosion Control And Storm Water Management; and The City of Andover and Coon Creek Watershed District (CCWD) will review erosion control and storm water management as part offuture applications. 4. Centralization And Design Of Facilities. The proposed homes will be connected to municipal utilizes (sewer and water). OTHER Shoreland Management Items: 25% max impervious coverage for each lot. 25-foot max building height. 50% open space preservation within the Shoreland Overlay area. Zoning and Lot Size (w/in Shoreland Management) The subject property is zoned R-4 Single Family Urban Residential. The property is within the shoreland overlay district. Shoreland regulations include additional regulations for lots. Shoreland Regulation Proposed Lot Area **Riparian Lots 15,000 13,497 Nonri arian Lots 11,400 14,213 Lot Width "Riparian Lots 80 56 Nonriarian Lots 80 56 **City staff has had a discussion with the DNR in regards to if the lots are riparian or not. DNR has indicated that the property is not riparian as there is a parcel to the west which would preclude the property from being riparian. The Ordinary High Water Level location makes no difference to the determination. The proposed lots (5, 6, and 7 do not have the right to dock across another parcel to gain water access. Currently the applicant is proposing an ingress/egress easement being recorded for lake access across lots 5-7 benefiting lots 1-4. Setbacks Pro osed PUD Standards (Sketch Plan): Proposed No. Item City Code Notes Standards: (R4: Single PROPOSED Family Urban) City Code 11-3-6: Lots D: Comer Lots: shall be minimum of 100' 1)* Lot Width (min.) 80' min. 56' wide as measured at the building Lot Width (corner) 100' min. 80.94' setback line or 90' wide for back to back lots. Lot Width — on cul-de-sac 160' min Lots will be served by City services 2) Qacking municipal sanitary sewer (max 2 lots of this N/A and no streets are proposed. max 2 lots reduced) width on the CDS) 3) Lot Depth (min) 130' min 230' + 11,400 square 13,497 square Exceeds R-4 standard/ Exceeds 4) **Lot Area (min.) feet feet Shoreland Nonriparian standard. 5) Block Length (max.) 1,320' max. N/A No new streets are proposed. 6) Cul-de-Sac Length (max.) 500' N/A No new streets are proposed. 7) Front Yard Setback (Shoreland) 40' 40, Shoreland requires a greater setback. 8) Side Yard Setback — 40' N/A Shoreland requires a greater Adjacent to Local Street (min.) setback. 9) Side Yard Principal Structure 10, 10, from Interior Lot Line The applicants floor plans show Side Yard Principal Structure living space behind the garage 10) for Garage over 20 feet wide 6' 6' which would technically need a 10 from Interior Lot Line foots setback for the living space from the property line. 11) Side Yard Setback - Interior 10, 10, (min.) Shoreland requires a greater 12) Rear Yard Setback (Shoreland) 50' 50, setback. Shoreland requires a greater 13)* Setback — County Road 50' 35' setback. Standard R-4 would have a (Shoreland) 40' setback. 14) Max Structure Height 25' 25' Shoreland 15) Max Lot Coverage (structure) 20% 20% 16) Impervious Coverage 25% 25% Shoreland 17) Right of Way (local Waal city 60' N/A No new roads proposed. Existing street) Street meets or exceeds 60' of ROW 18)* Driveway Access (from an 60' 54' As shown on Lot I. intersection) *Red text indicates deviation from City Code **See staff/DNR discussion comment on page 6. Wetlands/Floodplains The sketch shows a wetland buffer along the western boundary of lots 5,6, and 7. -------------- ------ ----- 3391_ _ 1 r rj �..m3 saea 0.]SAr \ __________ jy\1 1 r 2492.___ 12 1 I ( F 589 JTJ2 W EU9e 0f pNlneataa wenma er sEN ,ti � II` r._ - '} 6 a i l Js.019i sort. Edge of water-,� ') ' O.SRS Awn (06/24/24) , i dClna14(N Wolx-_.R3 _) 1,_ .�_ _� R39.60 ________. _� �rv.w8621 (NAtl)86) i 6185 c` . r Ylnna.-Oepartmnt ,_____ ___ ____a+__ _ ________ 01 NaWml R.;Z;rn ,t -R41S 599]]b3 W eeae Flood --_ Oev.=663.3 (NAW66) 7 Ir' ,ana. sway 1 ,3.499x S%Ft. �j-16 5' wellona 9'rIG malt Acres " one 234± 989'37'32'W INTERAGENCY COORDINATION E< Coordination with other Agencies The developer and/or owner are responsible to obtain all necessary permits (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Coon Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and any other agency that may have an interest in the site). Initial contact shall be made with the City Engineering Department regarding this item. PROCESS Andover Review Committee The Andover Review Committee (ARC) conducted an initial review of the sketch plan and has submitted these comments to the applicant. Staff suggests the comments be reviewed as part of the sketch plan process. These comments have been attached for review by the Planning and Zoning Commissioners. Public Notice In accordance with the City Code, public hearing notice is published in the Anoka County Union Herald and mailed notice was provided to properties within 350 feet of the site located within the MUSA boundary, using GIS data provided by Anoka County. Ih addition, signs have been posted on along Gladiola Street NW to alert passersby of the proposed public hearing. The City's practice is more generous than Statute which only requires the published notice and mailed notice to properties within 350 feet. Sketch plans in many communities are treated as internal reviews. The City's process of holding the public hearing at this level is helpful to generate discussion before the Preliminary Plat process. 0 Park and Trail Dedication — (Park and Recreation Commission) The Park and Recreation Commission will review the request on December 5, 2024. The current Master Park Plan does not identify parkland in this area. PUD Review The following City Code standards for PUD Review that the proposed development would need to address at the Preliminary Plat / PUD review stage. Applicable Ordinances City Code 13-3-9 regulates the findings that are required for a PUD to be approved: 1. The proposed development is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan for the City. 2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. 3. The proposed development demonstrates how each modified or waived requirement contributes to achieving the purpose of PUD. 4. The PUD is of composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation are feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004) City Code 13-3-11 identifies Desirable PUD Design Qualities that are sought in any PUD proposal as listed below. A. Achieves efficiency in the provision of streets and utilities and preserves area to achieve the elements of design qualities described in this Chapter. B. Provides convenient and safe access for vehicles and pedestrians and all types of activity that are anticipated to be a part of the proposed development. C. Provides a buffer between different uses, adjacent properties, roadways, between backyards of back-to-back lots. D. Preserves existing stands of trees and/or significant trees. E. Provides considerable landscaping treatments that complement the overall design and contribute toward an overall landscaping theme. F. Preserves significant usable space on individual lots or through the provision of open space within the development. G. Provides an attractive streetscape through the use of undulating topography, landscaping, decorative street lighting, decorative mailbox groupings, retaining walls, boulders, fencing, area identification signs, etc. H. The proposed structures within the development demonstrate quality architectural design and the use of high -quality building materials for unique design and detailing. I. The lasing quality of the development will be ensured by design, maintenance and use guidelines established through an owners' association. In Summary: This sketch plan would require the following: • Amendment to Comprehensive Plan or work on net density to achieve 4 units per acre. • Preliminary Plat. • Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development. • Final Plat. NEXT STEPS The Sketch Plan would be forwarded to the Park and Recreation Commission for their feedback (December 5, 2024) and City Council for their feedback (December 17, 2024). Based on the feedback received throughout the sketch plan process, the developer would modify the layout and make applications for Preliminary Plat, PUD, and Final Plat and submittals to seek their desired outcome. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning Commission is asked to hold a public hearing, take public feedback on the proposed Sketch Plan/Concept PUD, and informally advise the applicant through feedback on the proposed project. Attachments 1) Location Map 2) City Staff Engineer Comments, dated November 12, 2024 3) Public Comments Received — (None) 4) Sketch PUD Narrative 5) PUD Development Plan Shoreland Density 6) PUD Development Plan Shoreland Open Space 7) Conceptual Home Plans 8) Sketch Plan / PUD Concept Plan Community Development Director CC: Doug Schultz, General Contractors of MN Inc. (Email) 10 AN-MMAA Site Location —13624 Gladiola Street NW (Parcel ID: 33-32-24-31-0042) Date heated: November 15, 2024 Dhxkim .. The provrdermokesrw mpre rurion or warsnries wkh respect to dre reuse oJMis Ovro. Please notethis a rmtosurvey Prapertyline kmtionsareapproximate and provided only to show a general krodoo oftheproperty reloVw m adjocent roodsuMpraaerties. 1585 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 • (753) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8023 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV MEMORANDUM TO: Joe Janish, Community Development Director FROM: David Berkowitz, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Jason Law, Asst. City Engineer DATE: November 12, 2024 REFERENCE: Lakeview at Sloth Farm I Sketch Plan / Review #2 The following comments are regarding Review #2: 1. (Review #1) Proposed minimum lot sizes do not comply with City Code for R-1 zoning. The City Council will need to approve proposed PUD standards to deviate from City Code requirements. Acknowledged by developer, comment kept for tracking purposes. 2. (Review #1) The developer is responsible to obtain the necessary permits from the CCWD, MnDNR, MPCA, MCES, MDH or any other agency that is interested in the site. Acknowledged by developer, comment kept for tracking purposes. 3. (Review #1) Stormwater design shall meet requirements of the City's Stormwater Management Plan and CCWD requirements. Acknowledged by developer, comment kept for tracking purposes. 4. (Review#1) With it's proximity to Crooked Lake, shoreland regulations come into play with review from the MnDNR. Acknowledged by developer, comment kept for tracking purposes. 5. (Review #1) City water main and sanitary sewer are only available for a portion of this parcel. Refer to marked up plan. There are two existing 4" sanitary sewer stubs near Lots 5 and 6 to this parcel and no water main stubs. An existing 8" water main is located under the easterly portion of Gladiola Street that would need to be connected to with 1" water services for each parcel. An 8" sanitary sewer pipe would need to be extended in Gladiola Street from the existing sanitary manhole north to the middle of Lot 1. Based upon the current layout, this new sanitary sewer line would include 4 - 4" service stubs with one new 4" stub connecting into the existing 8" sanitary sewer pipe. Due to the disturbance required with the utility connections, the existing street section would need to be removed and replaced from the southerly removal limits for utilities to the new northerly sanitary sewer manhole. Acknowledged by developer, comment kept for tracking purposes. A street and utility plan will be provided with preliminary plat submittal. 6. (Review #1) City Fee Schedule for Sanitary Sewer and Water is attached. Required fees related to the sanitary sewer and water are a lateral change for the existing water main that is in the road, water area charge, water connection charge, sanitary sewer area charge and sanitary sewer connection charge. Costs associated with the required improvements identified in Item 5 will be the responsibility of the Developer. Acknowledged by developer, comment kept for tracking purposes. 12 7. (Review #1) Refer to Engineering Design Standards and Engineering Plan Review checklist for miscellaneous required items if plans evolve beyond sketch plan. Acknowledged by developer, comment kept for tracking purposes. 8. (Review #1) The Park & Recreation Commission will need to review if land should be dedicated for a park or if a cash dedication will be recommended in lieu of land. Acknowledged by developer, comment kept for tracking purposes. 9. (Review #1) When beginning the platting process, the plat, grading plan and all other plans must utilize the Anoka County coordinate system and datum so the information can be transferred to the City's GIS mapping. Acknowledged by developer, comment kept for tracking purposes. 10.Additional comments pending further review. Note: It is a requirement that the Developer respond to each of these items in writing loot digital copy from City and type responses below original comment) when re -submitting the revised plat to the City. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Jason Law, Assistant City Engineer at (763) 767-5130 or David Berkowitz, Director of Public Works/City Engineer at (763) 767-5133. 13 Sketch Plan Narrative for Lakeview at Sloth Farm City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 Introduction This narrative outlines the proposed development of "Lakeview at Sloth Farm," a residential project consisting of seven new patio homes at the corner of Bunker Lake Blvd and Gladiola St. in Andover, Minnesota. This development aims to enhance the local housing market by providing attractive, low -maintenance living options tailored for residents 55 and better. Site Context The site is currently zoned for residential use R4 but will require adjustments to accommodate the unique characteristics of the patio home development. The site is 2.4 acres, this limited size does not allow for achieving the Urban Residential Medium Low (URML) density rate of 4-8 units/acre. Lowering the width of each lot from 80' to 56' allows for more density while preserving the open space on the West side of the property. Development Overview Type of Development: Lakeview at Sloth Farm will consist of seven single -story patio homes, designed for energy efficiency and low -maintenance living. Each home will feature open floor plans, private outdoor spaces, and accessibility features, catering to a wide range of residents. Density and Layout: The proposed layout will require a Planned Unit Development (PUD). A combination of landscaping and natural buffers will enhance the aesthetic appeal and provide residents with a connection to the surrounding environment. Zoning Changes To move forward with this development, a PUD application will be submitted, as the project may necessitate modifications to existing zoning regulations. Key considerations for the PUD application include: Density Adjustments: We are looking to change the lot widths from 80' to 56'. We are asking to have all lot sites at 14,000 SF overall. We have three lots that are riparian which is a minimum of 15,000 SF and four lots that are non -riparian which is a minimum of 11,400 SF A Comprehensive Plan Amendment would allow for a slight increase in density to accommodate the seven patio homes and adding open spaces. Setback Variances: The design of the patio homes require adjustments to standard setback requirements. We are proposing a reduced side setback from 6' to 5' on the garage sides and along Bunker Lake Blvd reduced from 50' to 35' ensuring that homes are positioned to maximize views of the natural landscape while maintaining privacy. PUD Qualities and Design Characteristics In compliance with the PUD qualities and design characteristics outlined in the City Code, the following elements will be addressed in the application: 1. Integration with Surrounding Land Use: The development will be designed to blend harmoniously with existing residential neighborhoods and the natural environment, promoting community cohesion. 2. Setback Variances: The design of the patio homes may require adjustments to standard setback requirements, ensuring that homes are positioned to maximize views of the natural landscape while maintaining privacy. 3. Quality of Design: Each home will incorporate high -quality materials and architectural features that reflect the character of the area. The homeowner Association will ensure maintenance and use guidelines. 4. Open Space Preservation: The development will include common areas and landscaped buffers, preserving the natural beauty of the site and providing spaces for residents to gather and enjoy the outdoors. Existing trees will be preserved for screening and privacy. Conclusion . Lakeview at Sloth Farm represents an opportunity to add housing options while preserving the area's natural beauty. By addressing the specific PUD qualities and design characteristics required by the city, this development aims to create a vibrant, sustainable community that meets the needs of current and future residents. We look forward to collaborating with city officials and the community to bring this vision to fruition. BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD NW (C.S.A.H. NO. 116) N Y � .GA CROOKED LAKE Density Data Total Unsuitable Suitable Min. Lot Size Base Bonus Base Tier Arco Area Area 15,000 Sq.Ft. Density Density Proposed (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. FL) (Sq. Ft.) (Sewered (a lots) (H lots) Lots C.G.D.) 1 90,711 0 90,711 15,000 6.0 9.0 4 2 13,699 0 13,699 11,400 1.2 2.4 3 Total 104.410 0 104.410 7.2 11.5 7 *Bonus Base Density. To Quality. • Structure setbacks from the OHW must be at least 50% greater than the minimum setback, or, • The impact on the walerbody is reduced an equivalent amount through vegetative management, topography, or additional acceptable means, and the setback is at least 25% greater than the minimum setback. Open Space Data Item Shorelond Overlay Development Gross Developable Area 104,410 Sq.FI. = 2.40 Acres Net Developable Area 83,524 Sq.Ft. = 1.92 Acres Open Space Area 82.225 Sq.FI. = 1.89 Acres Number of Lots 7 Percent Open Space in Shoreland Overland District = 78.8% From code Section 13-4-9 (F)(2) b. Dwelling units or sites, road rights -of -way, or land covered by road surfaces. parking areas, or structures, except water oriented accessory structures or facilities, ore developed areas and shod not be included in the computation of minimum open space; C. Open space must include areas with physical characteristics unsuitable for development in their natural slate, and areas containing significant historic sites or unplatted cemeteries; d. Open space may include outdoor recreationat facilities for use by owners of dwelling units or sites, by guests staying in commercial dwelling units or sites. and by the general public: e. Open space may include subsurface sewage treatment systems if the use of the space is restricted to ovoid adverse impacts on the systems: I. Open space must not include commercial facilities or uses, but may contain water oriented accessory structures or facilities; g. The appearance of open space areas. Including topography, vegetation, and ollowlable uses, must be preserved by use of restrictive deed covenants. permanent easements. public dedication and acceptance, or other equally effective and permanent means; and h. The shore Impact zone, based on normal structure setbacks, must be included as open space. For residential PUDs, at least fifty percent (50%) of the shore impact zone area of existing developments or of least seventy percent (70%) of the shore impact zone area of new developments must be preserved in its natural or existing state. For commercial PUDs, at least fifty percent (50%) of the shore impact zone must be preserved in its natural slate. 1,n vlw iw viyi iq.iT9 eN. bzk v4 ni aWni^3 uv �' V rvuWs frcw.N'R vw gbu. FRONT ELEVATION .0 w'.fo'pya ws rmr �vmwn rae iwarwnrE wrsvwn aar. >iy tli ew+nibm ti' eew,wy atl b n q All ala,w ff o", s A. . . . b °b w> Q a FNu.Apid w'y —A, '� �Q mm a rum.x,m°M�• ot 3 M �aw �• s _ Q a V N rpw.mu * 'v S a GRANDEMOORE HOMES D MAIN FLOOR PLAN ma,d 3�i y Bma n m d a 4RFAi RWFI w p O O Y \Llrr ! S B4iX Y6 u 5 Y 5• YE' ,'d' ra• vnR.4e _ 9 4 0 e o• _ i ,w, io-owuami .c. viY�nW .�e g nwa. bcr. v4 ul cpnvg. uvf M]O mrtlw in 8^aP 8�+ w Bsv ns. rps� mMw. non ss ru a+cu+. my ,rym r:wa rixwa � �m s ypys a rmi yme .uxw .icVaY iu1 anon L;l way. Y]' eq �s•w +Yl- p}µ' 'v x n Ge....,r.., G o oew� emRron 'o way p 9 GRFAiIR�n 4 pwp..ella aalrg waY G G� b o G o ` b a s IY✓_n 4 b xv xu � ba - purr pane • 66 KIi�9. q u.p u�N v BLiN NOtE .q k�l ® I lO m.eY� n RLOIM, U \ a ,Fpw�l� ruin Plrrrx xlll i • I Fy W .µcvulm Y y ••'e• _u. i GRY LWM.� ..... ......... e.f G✓ccb ^9. e.un q .. io• n c�J .. erab k .air. e..e. r.• rn� i emrzoon .q GAR Gr�l�a yy •� . 3I q GRANDEMOORE HOMES O 0 • e.. ao .ukw� w.w e wl.ew r rra v-.• MAIN FLOOR PLAN a_ I. em. 3y,.. .uu v. .lo'p.e.sa• °'I rPr. CJ 2 p I .. 5 (;) I (i) I 0M Y \� J li fags pf DabmtN-.1 ww.ume gr =11 0 tap .I ml.-_ 0 L -MI.] Q' (06/2./24) U PeMfy High Walw Eler..862.4 (HAWN) (pw Ya negl0 OepMmmt at xawrd anmrde eFlees-. D...MDN 33 wee) Inwrmce Sway s - BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD NW (C.S.A.H. NO. 116) 32'E 153.81 NwLh In, of saux 1, / LN(ENEW TERRACE JIOnt_____--- 1 j J R z0,5a1 Sg. R. �. -•i I OA] bee I 0 i n r — ` 509'J/ 12 w 1 I•��� 14.11399f1. R O.33 bee 3 ffi Miii JYw I Six J w OS -j _35J a1_ -_--qInI(Ctf[-1 =�.Fl. L. rll \L_VIL vv �. L_ __ ___-___---__________J n.D6 _]SJ61__________________ y SR9'])]]-w ' 1u213 o orb O p— a sg.r,. 1 o w 033 o 1 E Tr-1 D1 A /.r a b T — I l: L____-__.------- OB ____-__---- tx Filift- F ' ']J'J2 � � Sea w �' 11091 +,teJ.00 I 15J.81 V V M9'SYM-W _ 5 ,..a,3. eUL ;i6.xi -team ______-----_�I - 6 r(1 1 I _ ri� 1YY i fe.019S Sort. 0 0,]22 Aon I R g - t ; I %g - 1arum) I, - n $8-14 _ 7 I M 1 • 1 �,, eunnvn Ne11a 0,312 A I^ IF : =u.m, LI.. 2343 -- 589'37'32'W ' �I 1`-South me .1 Let n 3. L WQMEN TFARAQ 1 I I I (TJ 30 0 JO 60 SCALE IN FEET uuneNditr cur el AMowr EtlaM9 Zmn9 Re - Angie Fermi, Way Reabmtbi Pmpoava imN9 Pug Proomm UAc ST9V Iwn1Y ..I. Rma Yimgo 0 LP w 0,00 Yim shoat IiMu^9 n ,Nolan Promaea Yt91en: LaF MmlGp" sal MunRbtl Plat Mm: Tmm Area IwwlO Sg.a - z.e0 Avn P,. Ad. D Setif. - .00 Awe, Pi Area: 0 SaJL - 0.00 Ann tolling miluaMg 15.5' buffs: 2050 SA.Ft. . 0.05 bee St—ber, gone Inducting 16.5' Buffer ]eM Sal FI. - 017 Acme, Nel DeaNapmenl Arye' &1.SN Sg.FL - t91 Acres x,l Oand" Mne: 3L 0 .b/Ave n summ>y ) Wee.. Fvnlly RaJ1mtax at, LEGEND - UGHT POLE = UTUTY POLE = GUY WARE - SIGN = MAILBOX • = FOUND IRON MONUMENT 0 IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED WITH LICENCE N0. 49138 • - PK NAIL FOUND - - SETBAG( UNE - CONCRETE SURFACE - BITUMINOUS SURFACE - GRAVEL SURFACE 4 _I - 16.5 WETLAND BUFFER Rw4119 9tleoeYe: (Seems Family urban Rnie CR. Rma: 50 fee F.ml psis: w teal yEo Cwnw 35 feet Rew pre: w feet se. '1 10 feel Ldw 50 feet Omar Cmnd Cml.mlwe e1 Yee 2MI ION Lane HE ®sees.. 1..9 EdFu e, Dwg StlMff 2201 107In Lane RE Bane. 4N 5M19 (763) Ml-OM5 0wH;,A/su—,m. rLl.. P.em NWwm Moen— A— .01 fri A.Nv.e And.. HH 11.1 (]6]) 652-0e0, nknTm-MC<dn VICINITY MAP SEG.00. T.U. R.24 Ad SCALE O U Ax0 Omin diEN. A EAswDxrs ARE sx0xx THus: Ra o I ILNI\(g NE\(A I ry W O Ins I FY CPJ W 2� E" i Cd W (NOT TO SCALE) 1 9 O E een ai Net n ..to mg eaignim, as ' N col .400 f y IMn Am, nee I.t IAreA fight id sago thN 1+m a eaag sou Nat Inn dI Meer Il I A S41 \) A SE \ ' e J 3 n .Idle sees Dap. to. unlna .IAwrrlu P.rn m Nlf, plat 0 cif F%IS11N0 PR[PERtt OESCRIPTON: (PID NO 33-32-24-31-0042) Lots I, 1 ma ]. Bmk 2 LA%ENEW TERRACE. Ma. County, on .... He. E--E NOTES: 0 I. In ProukNg this suraey no attempt has been mass 10 obtain d' snow data cm eying exNtence, sine. death. cmdilim, oriental, or location of any utility the ry lW+ F site. ethe, wiwte. municbm or aublkwn Aed. exisiln9 Ml I,y O �' 2. Tie a,ofm,imd murxe en m hade no Investigation by independent search for t mta o1 record. encumbrance, reebidlw covenente, enneMb till. edence. vi easy or other facts Beat an accurate and .,.of this branch may dleekes. Q) 3. Bearing. are based on the Ames County COddnat. Bpter, 4. me edemas o1 this Property I. IM24 Orrick, sbe.l NW. Judgment. Minnesota 55304, 5. Ste benchmerF: Sauthrnt Waeanl of Bunksr Lana Bwlewrs NW and 0ladida Street NW. Elemtim-660.63 (NAMESIO 6. All existing structures including but LUAdinga, Imcn and dx4s to be fomoaM. 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. Y ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Consider a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Amendment for a Drive - Through Use at 2184 Bunker Lake Boulevard — PID#: 34-32-24-21-0154 - The Architects Partnership Ltd. (Applicants) DATE: November 22, 2024 INTRODUCTION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Amendment for a drive -through for the subject property located at 2184 Bunker Lake Boulevard. City Code 12-11 requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for drive-in businesses or businesses with a drive-thru window in the GB: General Business Zoning District. The applicant is proposing a drive - through window for a proposed fast -casual restaurant that will be in the Andover Station development on an area guided General Commercial. Land use guidance for the adjacent properties to the north is Urban Residential Low. The land use guidance for properties to the east, south, and west is guided for General Commercial. 31 -A— !A; BACKGROUND The proposed CUP Amendment would amend a previous approval from January of 2023 for a restaurant with a drive-through/pick-up window. The site has some history of proposed uses with drive-throughs. In 2005, the City approved a CUP for a 5-lane drive -up window to serve the proposed TCF bank; however, the bank was not built within one year of the approval so per City Code Section § 12-15-7-D (excerpt below): D. Time Limit on Implementing Conditional Use: If the City Council determines that no significant progress has been made in the first twelve (12) months after the approval of the Conditional Use Permit, the permit will be null and void. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970) As the previous approval was not built in the 17 years that followed that approval it did not meet the City's time limit for implementation. In 2023, the City Council approved a new CUP for a drive -through on the site for a proposed Chipotle restaurant with a pick-up window. The CUP would have expired in January of 2024, but the applicant requested an extension through January of 2025. The current proposal is being processed as an amendment to the 2023 CUP. The applicant is planning to build a new 3,500 square foot (appx.), one-story retail banking center with a one -lane drive -through for a drive -up ATM/AHD on Lot 2 of Block 1 from the Andover Marketplace 2nd Addition plat. The site is generally located at the southwest corner of Bunker Lake Boulevard and Quinn Street NW. Access to the site would come from the internal access drive to the shopping center which runs west of Quinn Street. Financial Institutions are permitted uses in the GB: General Business District, though a CUP is required for drive-in businesses or those with a drive -through window. In addition to the CUP for the drive -through window, the Andover Review Committee (ARC) is currently reviewing the Commercial Site Plan for the proposed bank site. Parking Parking for commercial uses varies depending on the use within the structure. The applicant is proposing a new parking lot serving the retail banking center with 25 spaces. There are 16 existing parking spaces from the shopping center on this property which would also remain on the west side of the property. Parking is reviewed in commercial areas as each use obtains a permit for the building. City Code 12-14-8 OFF STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS provides a list of uses and parking ratios, which offers two different use standards that the proposed parking can be evaluated against: City Requirement Proposed Site Required Stalls Proposed Stalls Drive -In Establishment/ 1/150 s.f. of floor 3,465 s.f. floor 24 25 Convenience Food area, not less than 15 area stalls Retail Store and Service 1/200 s.f. floor area 3,465 s.f. floor 18 25 Establishment area Building Setbacks The proposed building will comply with the GB: General Business Zoning District building setbacks required by City Code 12-3-5. The building will be set back 56 feet from the north property line and will be 45 feet from the trail (which is in an easement on the northern portion of the property). Building Exterior Building and dumpster enclosure elevations are attached. Exterior building materials are primarily a tan cast stone block and dark brick with some silver ACM (metal) accents, with windows shown on the north, east, and west sides of the building which provide additional architectural character. The building would also have a flat roof with parapet which may provide some screening of any rooftop mechanicals; additional rooftop screening may be required. Drive -Through The proposed drive -through ATM and after-hours deposit will be on the east side of the building with space for vehicles stacking around the east and south sides of the building. The applicant notes that the retail banking center is designed for 3-4 cars to be stacked but the proposed drive-thru appears to have enough space to accommodate two to three times that number before traffic from the drive -through would back into the parking area. The proposed user is a retail banking center which differs from some retail banks in that it does not have a drive -through teller window; the drive -through area would be limited to the ATM and after-hours deposit. This should also limit the number of vehicles stacked in the drive -through. However, it is important for the City to consider that a CUP would run with the property and a subsequent building occupant might use the site as a traditional drive -through, so the site should be designed to ensure the site also works for a traditional drive -through. The drive -through lane will be set back 24 feet from the north property line, which meets the City Code requirement. This is set back further than the 16 feet in the previously approved CUP. The existing trail on Bunker Lake Boulevard currently runs across the northern portion of the property in a trail easement and the paved area of the trail dips further south in the area of the drive -through. The proposal is to keep the trail in its current location as opposed to relocating the trail to the north as per the previously approved plan. The proposed drive -through lane will be 18 feet in width and widen out to 23 feet near the drive -through ATM / AHD space to allow space for the bypass traffic. As the drive -through lane turns around the north side of the building it narrows to 15 feet to allow more room between the trail and the curb line for landscape screening of the drive -through. Staff are currently evaluating the plans through the Commercial Site Plan process. Traffic Circulation The site is designed to allow vehicles convenient access into the site from the private Quinn Street NW. Internal circulation allows for easy access though the site whether using the drive -through or the standard parking area. The parking lot will have two connection points to the existing parking area and driveway from the shopping center, allowing for easy access without requiring people to exit onto adjacent streets to access other businesses in the shopping center. Trash Enclosure The trash enclosure will be constructed from the same materials as the principal building and is located near the southwest corner of the site, as shown on the site plan. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Any mechanical equipment mounted on the roof or ground will be required to be screened to comply with City Code 12-14-5. Lighting All lighting is required to be shielded to prevent glare. Additional details for each type of fixture are reviewed through the Commercial Site Plan process to ensure adequate shielding will be provided. Screening / Landscaping A preliminary landscaping plan is attached with the site plan. The proposed plant quantities meet the requirements of City Code 12-14-6 as shown in the notes on that plan. Final adjustments to the landscaping plan will be made through the commercial site plan process. As vehicles would enter the drive through facing northeast/north toward the single-family homes on the other side of Bunker Lake Boulevard, headlight glare if not mitigated through screening could be a nuisance for those residential properties to the north of the site. Coniferous landscape plant material of sufficient height should be used to provide screening along the north/northeast side of the property to control headlight glare and will be required through the Commercial Site Plan. Previous CUPS for drive - through uses have also included a condition requiring coniferous landscaping at the north side of the drive through. The landscape plan currently shows coniferous shrubs at the northern edge of the drive -through. Landscaping will also need to be kept out of the sight triangles adjacent to the intersections and at access drives. City staff are currently evaluating the plans through the Commercial Site Plan process. Signage A monument sign is shown at the northwest corner of the property and areas for potential signage are shown on the building elevations. All signage will be reviewed through a separate sign permit process and sign permits will need to be obtained before signs can be placed on the property. Timeline for Agency Action If the Commission determines that restrictions greater than what is currently required by City Code are needed, they may recommend those conditions to the City Council as part of the CUP. One of the typical conditions that is included on conditional use permits is a timeline for implementation as defined in Ordinance No. 8, Section 5.03 (D), which states that if substantial progress is not made within one year from approval, the City Council may revoke the CUP. CUP Review Criteria City Code 12-15-713 provides the following general review criteria to consider when granting a CUP. In granting a Conditional Use Permit, the City Council shall consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and: 1. The effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, moral and general welfare of the occupants of surrounding lands. Businesses with drive -through windows are regulated by City Code as conditional uses. Adjacent uses within the development include additional commercial space. CUPsfor drive -through windows have been granted for similar locations with drive -up banking or ATMaccess. 2. Existing and anticipated traffic conditions, including parking facilities on adjacent streets and lands. The proposed retail banking center with a drive -through ATMand after-hours deposit is located near the intersection of two roadways which were designed to handle commercial traffic. The proposed drive -through window on the retail banking center would not create trajf c beyond what these streets were designed to accommodate. Access to the site would come through the existing development and would not create new access points on Quinn Street or Bunker Lake Boulevard. 3. The effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. Financial Institutions are a permitted use within the GB General Business District and the area has been guided for commercial uses in the Comprehensive Plan. There are not scenic views in the surrounding area identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff believes the CUP will not have a negative effect on surrounding property values. PLANNING COMMISSION REOUESTED ACTION After taking public testimony at the Public Hearing, the Planning Commission is asked to make a recommendation on the proposed Conditional Use Permit Amendment to the City Council for their consideration on December 3, 2024. Respe ly s b it d, Peter r City Planner Cc: The Architects Partnership, c/o Terron Wright (email only) Andover Station 2016, LLP , LLC c/o Chris Moe (email only) Attachments Draft Resolution of Approval Draft Resolution of Denial Location Map Applicants Narrative Preliminary Site Plan Set: Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Exterior Elevations CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A DRIVE -THROUGH WINDOW, FOR THE PROPOSED BUSINESS LOCATED AT 2184 BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: Lot 2, Block 1, Andover Marketplace 2' Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota WHEREAS the City of Andover previously approved a conditional use permit amendment for a drive - through window at the subject property, through resolution # R009-23 on January 17, 2023, and; WHEREAS on January 2, 2024, the City of Andover approved a one-year extension for the same conditional use permit for a drive -through window at the e subject property, through resolution # R003-24, and; WHEREAS the City of Andover has received an application for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment from applicant The Architects Partnership, Ltd. for a drive -through window at the subject property, with authorization from the property owner, and; WHEREAS the Conditional Use Permit Amendment for a drive -through window at the subject property, involves a change in plans from the previous approval and will require additional time to implement beyond the current January 2, 2025, time limit, and; WHEREAS the Planning and Zoning Commission held a Public Hearing on November 26, 2024, pursuant to the requirements of City Code 12-15-3, pertaining to the public hearing process, and; WHEREAS the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of City Code, and finds the request would not have a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and general welfare, values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area, and; WHEREAS the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Conditional Use Permit request., and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the conditional use permit amendment for a drive -through window at 2184 Bunker Lake Boulevard (PIN: 34-32-24-31- 0154), subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall complete a commercial site plan review process with the City in compliance with City Code 12-15-4. 2. All other permits shall be obtained, including but not limited to Building, Department of Health, etc. 3. The applicant shall provide coniferous/evergreen landscaping to screen headlights from vehicles in the drive -through from residential properties to the north. 4. The Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to a time limit for implementation within twelve months after approval of this Conditional Use Permit Amendment, or the permit will be null and void, as per City Code 12-15-71). Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this _ day of 2024. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Michelle Hartner, City Clerk Sheri Bukkila, Mayor CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R A RESOLUTION DENYING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A DRIVE - THROUGH WINDOW, FOR THE PROPOSED BUSINESS LOCATED AT 2184 BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: Lot 2, Block 1, Andover Marketplace 2nd Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota WHEREAS the City of Andover previously approved a conditional use permit amendment for a drive - through window at the subject property, through resolution # R009-23 on January 17, 2023, and; WHEREAS on January 2, 2024, the City of Andover approved a one-year extension for the same conditional use permit for a drive -through window at the subject property, through resolution # R003-24, and; WHEREAS the applicant is The Architects Partnership, Ltd. and has requested an amendment to a conditional use permit for a drive -through window of the subject property, with authorization from the property owner, and; WHEREAS the Planning and Zoning Commission held a Public Hearing on November 26, 2024, pursuant to the requirements of City Code 12-15-3, pertaining to the public hearing process, and; WHEREAS the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request does not meet the criteria of City Code, and finds the request would have a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and general welfare of the City of Andover, and; WHEREAS the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council denial of the Conditional Use Permit request, and; WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Andover agrees with the Planning and Zoning Commission, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby denies the conditional use permit amendment request for a drive -through window at 2184 Bunker Lake Boulevard (PIN: 34-32-24-31-0154); for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this day of 2024. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Sheri Bukkila, Mayor Michelle Hartner, City Clerk Site Location -2184 Bunker Lake Boulevard NW (Parcel ID; 34-32-24-31-0154) f PEI — j4pI M r , Ap± Date Created: Novem"r 15, 2024 Disclaimer: Toe provider makes no represenradonor warrwries with respect ro Me reuteo/Mu dam pkm note tree is rrot a sumyy Pr p ny tiM Warions art approtimare aM provided onN ro sMw a grnerW beatlan of the property rtkmse ro adjaatnrroods aMproperdet. The Architects Partnership, Ltd. 200 South Michigan Avenue, Suite 1020, Chicago, IL 60604 RECEIVED 401P OCT S'u2024 CITY OF ANDOVER Peter Hellegers City Planner City of Andover Andover City Hall 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, MN 55304 October 18, 2024 Re: Project narrative for the property 2184 Bunker Lake BLVD NW Dear Mr. Hellegers, This letter is to detail our application for Commercial Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Amendment to construct a new retail banking center. As part of the development of this site, we are looking to contribute to the goal of improving the appearance and function of Bunker Lake Blvd. The process of engaging the neighborhood and community through this project will help Bunker Lake Blvd. as a distinctive place that builds on the strengths of its culturally diverse businesses and neighborhoods. SITE, LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN For the new building we are proposing to add a through the wall ATM/AHD at the east side of the building. The proposed bank equipment will be facing away from the main view along Bunker Lake Blvd. throughfare. A new masonry trash enclosure will be located at the south west corner away from the bank main entry and view of Bunker Lake Blvd. The roofing system will consist of wall parapets and entry tower to provide visual variety and screening for roof mounted equipment. The building cladding will consist of brick in colors 'Midnight Black' and 'Platinum' and manufactured 'Harvey Stone'. All materials will be durable, high -quality and appropriate for external use. New storefront system will be provided in color black anodized with energy efficient glazing. All four facades have been designed and enhanced with landscape and design elements such as architectural lighting, and metal awnings that complement the view from the right of way and Quinn St. NW. Also, awnings, canopies, and landscaping at the street level create a more comfortable pedestrian scale and character to the site. The configuration of the existing car park will remain except the west side of the building, which will be modified to provide the best vehicular path for additional parking and the drive-thru ATM lane. New landscaping will be provided throughout the site, specifically an abundance of landscaping foundation plantings and groupings of shrubs will be provided to comply with the landscape ordinance. A conditional use permit is requested for the use of the previously mentioned attached ATM drive - through. This proposed use will not have any negative impacts to the health and safety of the public. Since the proposed drive -through is confined to the interior of the lot and does not have any direct access onto a public right of way. All vehicular circulation is contained internally. We are proposing a pedestrian path of travel from Quinn Street NW to the main entrance along the west side of the building. Pedestrians will traverse through the entrance of the drive through lane, however, we are providing a striped The Architects Partnership, Ltd. 200 South Michigan Avenue, Suite 1020, Chicago, IL 60604 meo crosswalk for safe access. Additionally, a bike rack will be incorporated to the project for customer and bank employee use. The proposed site plan has a well thought landscape and screening design to enhance the aesthetic of the site, and complements the existing landscaping found within Quinn Street NW in the surrounding development. Lighting Design and Locations: To provide the best and most efficient lighting design and locations, a photometric study has been developed and included in this submittal. A fully new layout of site lighting will be proposed along with complementary architectural lighting within the building which will enrich the architectural design of the site at night and will also add to the security for the users during night hours. Sustainability Components: The project will contain the following components which would contribute to sustainability practices the City is encouraging: Installation of additional trees/landscaping within development area LED lighting The proposed schedule has construction commencing by April 2025 (pending regulatory approvals) and an anticipated occupancy date of late Fall 2026. Parties Involved: Applicant Terron Wright The Architects Partnership, LTD (TAP) Architect of Record Timothy Meseck The Architects Partnership, LTD (TAP) Property Owner Andover Station 2016 LLC. Zoning Classification: Civil Engineer/landscape Matt Lingham Kimley-Horn and Associates, INC. Lease Holder Theodore Foggy JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The property in question is in a zoning district classified as GB General Business. Type of Business: The type of business is a retail banking center with one (1) drive -through service lane for use of an automatic teller machine (ATM) through the wall. The hours of operation will be Monday— Friday 9 AM — The Architects Partnership, Ltd. 200 South Michigan Avenue, Suite 1020, Chicago, IL 60604 rr • 6 PM and Saturday 9 AM — 2 PM. The total number of employees and any one time will be nine. The nine employees will consist of two (2) teller, (1) lead teller, two (2) bankers, one (1) branch manager, one (1) mortgage loan office, one (1) financial advisor and one (1) business banker. Timothy R. Meseck The Architects Partnership, LTD. 5 E s` S w 0 a S EISACK BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD NW (COUNTY ROAD NO. 116) (120 FOOT MIDE PUBLIC RIGHT OF VJAY) PROPERTY SUMMARY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 1.32 AC 157.297 SF DISTURBEDAREA 1.04 AC 145,492 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.03 AD 11.337 RE 12,94% EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 1.01 AC 44.155 SF 197.06% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.5]AC /25.219 SF/55.44% PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 0.4]AC/ 20.2]3 SF/ 44.56% NET INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.54 AC 123,882 SF SITE DATA EXISTINGZONING GB-GENERALBUSINESS PROPOSED LAND USE FINANCW.INSTTUTION PARKING SETBACK$ FRONT-20' SIDEPREAR=IV RIGHTOF WAY-20' BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT=40' INTERIOR SIDE =IV STREET SIDE=30' REAR=2T COUMY ROAD SIDE= S0 LEGEND — — — PRov9R,uNE EEIBACROM OMINME AND NIUW EASEMENT PRWPSEDEENCE PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER STANDARD DUTY ASPNALTPANAENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION I... '., HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION CONCRETE EWAL SIDK CONCRETE 11 SFORSECTION ROVEG LNG RAN FOR WATERS SEE GRADING PLAN FOR OETSILS REA SITE PLAN NOTES 1. REFERTOMEARCHITECNPALPWiSFORFXACTLOCATTONSANDOIMEROCKS CF STOOPS, TRUCK DCCKC, TMSH ENCLOSV RES S PRECISE SOLOING E R EN SIONS REFER TO ENE SM ELECTRICAL PENT FOR LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LIGHT POLES. CONDOT%MID ELECTRIM EQUIPMENT. 2. REFERTOCERTFIEDSMOURMTOR PLAT FOR FXACTLOCATION OFEUISTING NDARYOIMENNOM ANDADNCENTRIGM-0E-WAYe PARCELINFORMATON. 3. DIMENSIONS AND RADII ME DRAKN TOME FACE OF CURB. UNLESS OTREMASE NOTED. DMENSONS ARE ROUNDED TO NE NEAREST TENTN FOOT. AND AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO ME NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 4. UNLESSOMERNI3E NORD,MECOXTMCTORSNALLBE RESPoNSIBLEFOR RELOCAP INCLUDING SITE IMFROVEN TRVNCTCONFLIGYTMLEA PROPOSED VARK INCLV DING GOT T' NOT L W ITED TO TMF Fk SkHS. LIGNT POLES. ABOYEGPOVNOUTUDIES.ETCPERFORNr KINAMORDANCEANN C RNIHGAUTMMESREQUIRFMEMSANDPRWECTSREMRK SPECIFICATIONS COS BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. S. TY%COL MRONG STALL MMENSIONS SR>LL BE TOFEET IN WATT AND IBFEET IN TENGTHUNLESSOTMNGSSFIXO1GNTED. 6. MONVMENTSIGNISIAREPUAMDONTHEARCHRE=N PU SMDME B. FOR GRAPHIWLMNFORIMTONALPURPoSES ONLY. CONTRACTORTO VERIFY SIGN DIMEMOBIS. LOCATON AND REQUIRED PERINTS W.Ti TIE OMIER. T. ALLPAVEMEMMARRIMONNWOHALLBEMITEPAINT. S. THE CURBSOJRERANDCONCRETEANEELSTOPSLOCATEOMFRONTOFTHE PROPOSEDADA STMLSE MSLEPRETOEE VAIMED SKEWYELLOW. KEYNOTELEGEND QcwwTElE0— Q 1TNCAETERUEDVIPB.D Oc wrcxcTsl xDEwEOEVAVEu[xNCLaDenmER 0 Ixaun—OONDRETE'—.ATON PR.Y.EYDC ..EE Eax rexw3. TAN—TEDDD.TM SEEDLT®.. DD. pO WW.F IEEE4GW SnETNV Fpt CETM51 W PX ED MeaMM . ® ENOPECEDT 4OiuER. ttMRETE E...5Sp4RDq PE R EP g CMR ® m.6HExawuRE ISFE.DW PI.xs FAR CETarm 17 BNEE— ASSOCIATEDCONCAETEP.DRMwDRK,BEEMQH Q—SE-Ecrzasswnu OY xMuueNT sKN REE KW R MR RTNL[I CIP...AAQP,G�AF IPw MFOET.U, ULNG DATA 3,46ssF KnowwhaPsbelOw. MAC Call before you dig. BUILD TOTALBUILDINGAREA PERCENT OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA PARKING SUMMARY REOUIREOPARKING 14 SPACES ®1 SPACE /250 SF TOTAL PROPOSED PARKING 25SPACES REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING 2 STANDARD SPACES 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING 2VANACCESSIBLE GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 "A E • ,BBIBBINI, `1 Z lD W Tn a U Z J a w C400 LANDSCAPE LEGEND EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.) REED WTH MNDOTWET DITCH(WD) )' I EXISTINGDECIDUOUS TREE (rvP1 STATEVIDE SEED MIX (rvPJ EDGER(TYPJ y? SEED WITH ECO£SSENOALS-TALL PRAIRIE GRASS MIX BY PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, INC. Know what'Sbelow. \ ♦��� ALL ,, (TYP) Cell before you dig, ■� DISTMATEDMITSOFSEEDINGSEEDING ALLDIGTURBEDPRFAS/TYP.) � SOD (TYP.) ZS EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE(TYP) N IIID1m�aUUM�4///// SEED/SOD EDGE (TYR) BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD NW (COUNTY ROAD NO. 116) 4DIST/NG TRAIG E \^ Wm LEASIMOWN OOORNMENOMERMU■ 25-SBA A pi 17-SLBBGL 2-PEE 2-BDL Y C PEE 5-BC 12-SR 33-W/L' C 2-FF 10-GL BOL SBA BHB HMS ■ `5-NSG ■ ��uuu■uu�■ -BCJ -ANH SBA KBE 2 I y. T Iw mp��cn T SBA -BHB' m O 1-NI -AFD -SLB Illle ECH I HMS A PROPOSEDSYRFACED FRTRAlM VSN n O / 5 0 V 1 NORTH I ' O v/ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET , I � I / O 10� LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES O LANDSCAPE SUMMARY Q EDGER(rYP.) LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS -GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE O DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH(rYP.) REQUIRED: 14 TREES 1,02D L.F. SITE PERIMETER /]5 L.F. © SOO (TYP.) PROVIDED: 14TREES REOVIRED: 68 SHRUBS =1,030 L.F. SITE PERIMETER/15 LF. TO REMAIN D PROVIDED: 73 SHRUBS OTREE PROTELTIN PIALE REQUIRED: 18 SHRUBS=263 LF. BUILDING PERIMETER/ 15 LF. O PRESERVE EXISTING LAWM (TYP.) PROVIDED: IOSHRUBS (D EXISTING SHRUBS/PERENNIALS TO REMAIN(TYP.) PARKING ISLAND REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED: T TREES -1,6]1 S.F. ISLAND LANDSCAPE AREA 1270 S.F. PROVIDED: T TREES IS PROPOSED I i EXISTING) REQUIRED: 55 SHRUBS =1,671 S.F. ISLAND LANDSCAPE AREA /30 S.F. PROVIDED: 55 SHRUBS 1:.IS I4 A TOTAL REQUIRED TREES: 21 TREES TOTAL PROPOSED TREES: 22 TREES 12 EXISTING. 22 PROPOSED) S TOTAL REQUIRED SHRUBS: U2 SHRUBS TOTAL PROPOSED SHRUBS: 189SHRUBS =(95 SHRUBS NdORNAMENTAL GRASSES) PR CREDIT FOR EXISTING TREES: EXISTING HEALTHY DECIDUOUS TREES GREATER THAN 4 CAL. IN. OR yti 11 t EVERGREEN GREATTHAN 6 IT. HT., AND NOT IDENTIFIED ON CITY 'S PROHIBITED PLANT UST MAY BE CREDITED TOWARD MINIMUM REpUIREOTREES ON SITE PLANTSCHEDULE / SYMBOL CODE QTY COMMONNAME BOTANICAL NAME CONTAINER CAL. I OVER^STO)fR)Y TREE / BOL 4 8OULEVARDUNDEN TILWAMERICANA'BOULEVARD 88B SSCAL. i/ FFM 3 SUGAR MAPLE -ER SACCNARUM'FALL FIESTA' B8B 3.5'CAL. HAC 3 COMMON HACKBERRY CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS B&B 2.5-CA-. / O' KCY 2 ESPREGSO KENTUOKY COFFEETREE GYMNOCLADUS DIOICA'ESPRESSO' BBB 2.5'CAL. ( • f NPO 4 NORTHERN PIN OAK QUERCUSELLIPSOIDALIS B&B 2.5.OAL. DPEE 4 PRAIRIE EXPEDITION AMERICAN ELM ULMUS AMERICANA'LEWIS B CI -ARK- TM ESE 1.5-CA-. SYMBOL CODE OTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONTAINER SPACING I DECIDUOUS SHRUBS OAID 32 ARTIC FIRE DOGWOOD CORNUS SERICEA'ARTIC FIRE YS CONT. 3' O.C. ANH 5 ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA ..RAN.- ARBORESCENS'ANNABELLE' #5 CONT. 4'D.C. L. 21 GR—OW FRAGRANT SUMAC RHU3 AROMATICA'GRO-LOW #S CONT, d'O.C, \ EVEERGRREEN SHRUBS (DBCJ 12 BLUE CHIP JUNIPER JUNIPERUS HORIZONTAUS'BLUE CHIP' #5 CONT. 5'D.C. \vrD SER 11 SPARTAN EASTERN REDCEDAR JUNIPERUSMRGINMA'SPARTAN' #6 CONT. 3'00 OFNAMENTALGRASSES HMS 27 HEAVY METAL SWITCHGRASS PANICUM VIRGATUM HEAVY METAL' 01 CONT. 3-D.C. J0 NSG 15 NORTHWIND SWITCH GRASS PANICUM VIRGATUM WORTHWIND' #1COW. 24.0.0. SLB 33 STANDING OVATION LITTLE BLUESTEM SCHMACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM'STANDING OVATION #1 CONT. 26'O.C. SYMBOL CODE Ott COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CTNR. SPACING I SHE 66 BIRCH HYBRID BELLFLOWER CAMPANULA X'BIRCH HYBRID' #1 CONT. 18'O.C. ECH 36 RUBY STAR CONEFLOWER ECHINACEAPURPUREA'RUBY STAR #I CONT. 18'O.C. KBS ID KOSOLD BLAZING STAR SppPINNCCCATA'KOBOLD' LIAT(CRIISpp511M #1 CONT. 18.O.C. N SYgERS�B��IER BEAUTY�YQNIDN AALLIUMXMEF BEAUTY' 91 CONT. IS-O.C. 15. Up SU%APP✓R,06dI�rn✓riTr-HEIGHT MIIN[Y i�Bi A �rl(I�it '.inwSP.=8PEC1ES a�QTrYu40UAh{�Ii r. `a z I a W a ♦a♦�� ,V V! Z J L100 q 4 3gk�} 8 fl NORTH ELEVATION (M]Q5-515 O BUNKER LAKE BLVD. AND QUINN ST. 2184 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW. ANDOVER, MN 55304 WEST ELEVATION ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 09.06.2024 L_ I STOREFRONT ACM PANELS CASTSTONE COLOR: BLACK ANODIZED COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED COLOR: LIMESTONE ALUM. yy HEWN STONE METALCANOPY&SUNSHADES BRICK BRICK COLOR BLACK ANODIZED COLOR: PLATINUM COLOR: MIDNIGHT BIICK ALUM. INTERSTATE BRICKS INTERSTATE BRICKS - COLUMN CLEAR GLASS COPPING CAP COLOR: CLOUD WHITE COLOR: MATTE BLACK STEEL PETERSEN ALUMINUM DECEIVED CITY OF ANDOVER SCALE: }•=T p 5 IR 1T ArchitecNDesigner The Architects Partnership, Ltd. 200 South Michigan Avenue Chicago, IL 60604 t: 312.583.9800 f: 312.583.9890 TAP Project Number: 24036 0 20 In SOUTH ELEVATION T: Uz-k5-5 E O BUNKER LAKE BLVD. AND QUINN ST. 2184 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW. ANDOVER, MN 55304 I _ STOREFRONT ACM PANELS CASTSTONE COLOR BLACK ANODIZED COLOR CLEAR ANODIZED COLOR: LIMESTONE ALUM. HEWN STONE M IPA. 1♦ METAL CANOPY B SUNSHADES BRICK BRICK COLOR: BLACK ANODIZED COLOR-. PIATINBM COLOR: MIDNIGHT BLACK 7 ALUM. INTERSTATE BRICKS INTERSTATE BRICKS 1 COLUMN CLEAR GLASS COPPING CAP COLOR: CLWD WHftE COLOR MATTE BLACK STEEL PETERSEN ALUMINUM EAST ELEVATION ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 09.06.2024 SCALE i'= I* 0 5 10 15 Architect/Designer The Architects Partnership, Ltd. 200 South Michigan Avenue Chicago, IL 60604 t: 312.583-9800 f: 312.583.9890 TAP Project Number: 24036