HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC February 16, 1993
o
~~
CITY of ANDOVER
"-
/
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - FEBRUARY 16, 1993
Call To Order - 7:30 p.m.
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Community School Report
Discussion Items
1. Lot Split/Variance - 159th Ave. & Narcissus Street
2. Lot Split/Variance - 159th & Goldenrod street
3. Discussion - zoning/Emmerich Property
4. Amend Ordinance 8, Section 7.03/Special Uses
5. Approve Survey Consultant/92-27
6. Order Condemnation/Pheasant Glen
7. City Hall Park Complex #2 Discussion
8. Approve Signal/Crosstown & Bunker Lake Boulevards/93-1
\ HRA Meeting
J
9. Public Hearing/1993 CDBG Budget
Staff, Committees, Commissions
10. Planning Consultant Reimbursement Request
11. Northern Metro Mayors' Association Discussion
12. Schedule Meeting/Round Lake & Bunker Lake B1vds.
Reconstruction
Non-Discussion Items
13 .
14.
1 ~
_:l.
16.
Award Bid/Well *2/93-3
Approve change in Spec Requirements/Urban Area
Accept Petition/93-5/Winslow Hills 3rd
Accept Feasibility Report/93-6/Bunker & Round Lake Blvd.
Watermain
Reduce Letter of Credit/Northglen 2nd Addition
17.
Mayor-Council Input
Aoproval of Claims
Adjournment
"
, /
@\'.
~-''::t;~,....
\~
'f
J;
if
'\ ,\.... < ,~P'
) ~;:";%";t;":~/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Fphrl1"ry 111
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Approval of Minutes
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
Approval of Minutes
Admin. l rr
V. Volk ,UI
BY:
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
February 2, 1993
Regular Meeting
I
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
SECOND BY
" TO
@\~'~
.''''
"' "?,
;1
, \ <</I
/ ~ ./
',....:,;:;.;,'7'"~.::-:::;i<C-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO D' , t
. lSCUSSlon I ems
ORIGINATING
Planning
David
BY: Ci ty
DATE
DEPARTMENT
~
L. Carlberg,
Planner
February 16~ 1993
,-''1
ITEM Lot Spli t/Variance
NO. 159th & Narcissus st.
/'''^J..~ r U~, ~ ,'..:I
....
APPROVEDlFQR
AGEND~ >v
I JJJ
Jv
BY:
~
REQUEST
The Planning and Zoning Commission at its regular meeting on
January 26, 1993, reviewed the request for a lot split/variance
by John and Valerie Reynolds located at 159th Avenue NW and
Narcissus Street NW. The applicants are requesting to split a
9.94 acre parcel into two parcels. The variance request is for
lot frontage on Parcel B. Please consult the attached staff
report dated January 26, 1993 and the minutes from the Planning
and Zoning Commission meeting for further information.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the lot
split/variance request with conditions as indicated on the
attached Resolution.
Note: The Council will need to decide how park dedication fees
are to be collected as indicated in the Planning and Zoning
Commission minutes. Staff has been requiring $400.00 for each
dwelling unit that could be constructed upon the proposed
subdivided property. Legal staff may need to be consulted at the
meeting.
MOTION BY
, TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
"
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
)
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE LOT SPLIT AND VARIANCE REQUEST OF
JOHN AND VALERIE REYNOLDS TO CREATE TWO (2) PARCELS PURSUANT TO
ORDINANCE NO. 40.
WHEREAS, John and Valerie Reynolds have requested a lot
split and variance to create two (2) lots for the sale and
construction of single family homes on the property located at
159th Avenue NW and Narcissus street NW (PIN 17-32-24-44-0002)
legally described as:
The North Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter
of Section 17, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota,
except the East 660 feet thereof; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission has reviewed
the request and has determined that said request meets the
criteria of Ordinance No. 40 and that based on Section IV, the
City Council may vary the application of any of the provisions of
the Ordinance; and
. )
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission finds the
request is consistent with the comprehensive plan and would not
have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and
general welfare of the City of Andover; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no
opposition to said request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the lot split and variance as
requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning and zoning Commission to allow the lot split and variance
on said property with the following conditions:
1. That the applicant pay a park dedication fee pursuant to
Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07.
2. That the lot split/variance be subject to a sunset clause
as defined in Ordinance No. 40, Section III(E). approval.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
16th day of February, 1993.
CITY OF ANDOVER
J. E. McKelvey, Mayor
'.
ATTEST
/
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
,
(
\
/
~,i
CITY of ANDOVER
. ._/ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - JANUARY 26, 1993
MINUTES
The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and zoning
Commission was called to order by Acting Chairperson Steve Jonak on
January 26, 1993, 7:30 p.m, at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown
Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota.
Commissioners present:
Maynard Apel, Bev Jovanovich, Becky Pease
(arrived at 7:36 p.m.)
Bonnie Dehn, Marc McMullen, Randy Peek
City Planner, David Carlberg
Others
Commissioners absent:
Also present:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
January 12, 1993:
Page 7, Variance: Ordinance 10, 9l06a(3). Correct
to indicate the applicant Twin Star Homes
requested the item be tabled,
Page 8, Fourth line, change "order" to "other".
Page 8, Other Business, 2nd paragraph, 2nd line,
change "8.01" to "8.02".
,
/
MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Jovanovich, to accept the Minutes as
corrected. Motion carried on a 3-Yes (Jonak, Apel, Jovanovich), 4-
Absent (Dehn, McMullen, Pease, Peek) vote.
(0
PUBLIC HEARING: LOT SPLIT/VARIANCE - 159TH AVENUE NW AND NARCISSUS
STREET NW, JOHN AND VALERIE REYNOLDS
7:32 P,M. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the lot split and variance request of
John and Valerie Reynolds to split a 9.94-acre parcel into two separate
lots of 4.55 acres and 5.39 acres. The variance would be from the 300-
foot lot frontage requirement on Parcel B. Staff is recommending
approval with the conditions that park dedication fees be paid for each
lot (total of $800) and that it be subject to a sunset clause.
(Commissioner Pease arrived at this time; 7:36 p.m.)
Commissioner Apel questioned the amount of park dedication fee. It was
his understanding that in the past, park dedication fees applied to each
new resulting parcel. In this case, a house could be constructed on the
entire parcel without having to pay park dedication. The lot split
creates one new additional parcel; and in the past, park dedication was
paid only for the newly created parcel.
"
,
J
Mr. Carlberg argued the interpretation since he has been with the City
has been to collect park dedication based on the number of additional
dwelling units created. Neither parcel has a house constructed on it;
therefore, park dedication would be required on both parcels.
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 26, 1993
Page 2
/
(Public hearing: Lot Split/Variance, 159th & Narcissus, Continued)
The Commission asked for Council interpretation on the park dedication
fees, as they did not know of any cases in which both parcels were
required to pay park dedication.
Acting Chairperson Jonak opened the hearing for public testimony. There
was none.
MOTION by Pease, Seconded by Apel, to close the public hearing. Motion
carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Dehn, McMullen, Peek) vote.
MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Pease, recommend that the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend the Resolution granting the lot split and
variance request of John and Valerie Reynolds to create two parcels
pursuant to Ordinance No. 40 as compiled and presented by Staff. Motion
carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Dehn, McMullen, Peek) vote. 7:43 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING: LOT SPLIT/VARIANCE 159TH AVENUE NW AND GOLDENROD STREET
NW, OMAR AND JODIE DIZAYEE
\ 7:43 p.m. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the request of a lot split and variance
J by Omar and Jodie Dizayee to split a 4.89-acre parcel into two parcels
each of 2.44 acres. Variances are needed from the 300-front foot lot
frontage requirement on Parcel A and the 2.5-acre lot area requirement
for both parcels. There is a question as to where Goldenrod Street NW
has been constructed, It is thought the street has not been constructed
to where it is shown on City documents. If that is true, a decision
needs to be made as to who will construct and pay for that extension,
There is also some concern about the large variance needed for lot
frontage on Parcel A, which is a very large departure from the
requirement. Mr. Carlberg also noted the Commission may wish to
eliminate the variance for area requirement on Parcel A by subtracting
the needed acreage from Parcel B. Staff is recommending denial of the
lot split because of the large variance to lot frontage, the issue of
construction of Goldenrod Street and the issue as to whether Parcel B is
buildable. The building pad on Parcel B would have to be across the
drainage ditch. If the Commission recommends approval, Staff suggests
the conditions of park dedication and a sunset clause. The park
dedication issue raised in the last item will apply to this lot split as
well.
Acting Chairperson Jonak opened the hearing for public testimony.
"-
J
Lvle O'Neal, 14303 Lexinqton Avenue - owns the property to the east of
the lots in question. He asked if the intent is to extend Goldenrod
Street to the end of the easement. Mr. Carlberg stated the idea would
be to make Parcel B have frontage to at least where the cul-de-sac
should be. Staff did not discuss extending the whole street down the
side of the property.
,
I
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
January 26, 1993
AGENDA ITEM
3. Public Hearing: Lot
SplitjVariance - 159th Ave
& Narcissus - Reynolds
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
BY:
APPROVED FOR
AG.~
BY~
The Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review the lot
split/variance request of John and Valerie Reynolds to split a
9.94 acre parcel into two (2) separate lots of 4.55 acres and 5.39
acres. The applicant is requesting a variance from the three
hundred (300') foot lot frontage requirement on Parcel B (see the
attached diagram). Parcel B has two hundred twenty-five (225')
feet of frontage on 159th Avenue NW. Therefore, a variance of
seventy-five (75') feet is requested.
The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Rural.
Applicable Ordinances
Ordinance No. 40 regulates the division of lots. A lot split is
defined as any division of a lot, parcel or tract of land into not
more than two (2) parcels when both divided parcels meet or exceed
the minimum requirements for platted lots in the applicable zoning
district.
Ordinance No. 40 also allows the City Council to vary
from the provisions in the Ordinance.
Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 establishes the provlslons for
minimum lot width, lot depth and lot area in an R-1 zoned
district. The minimum requirements in an R-1 district are as
follows:
Lot Width at Front Setback
Lot Depth
Lot Area Per Dwelling
300 feet
150 feet
2.5 acres
Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07.10 establishes the mlnlmum area of
land dedicated to park and open space. For all subdivisions by
metes and bounds description the subdivider or developer may elect
to pay, in lieu of the park. dedication requirements, the sum of
four hundred dollars ($400.00) for each dwelling unit that could
be constructed upon the proposed subdivided property. In the
event the developer elects to pay said four hundred dollar
($400.00) charge, the city may collect additional park fees if the
developer re-subdivides the property in the future.
Review
The purpose of the lot split is to create two lots for the
construction of single family homes.
Page Two
Lot Split/variance - J. & V. Reynolds
159th Ave NW & Narcissus St. NW
January 26, 1993
/
Commission Options
1. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval of
the lot split/variance request of John and Valerie Reynolds
located at 159th Avenue NW and Narcissus Street NW.
The Commission finds that based on Section IV of Ordinance No.
40, the City Council may vary the application of any of the
provisions in Ordinance No. 40 and that the variance request
is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and
would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the City of Andover.
2. The Planning and zoning Commission may recommend denial of the
lot split/variance request of John and valerie Reynolds
located at 159th Avenue NW and Narcissus Street NW.
The Commission finds the request does not meet the
requirements of Ordinance No. 40. In denying the request, the
Commission shall state those reasons for doing so.
3. The Planning and zoning Commission may table the item pending
further information from Staff.
i
staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the lot split requested by John and
Valerie Reynolds located at 159th Avenue NW and Narcissus Street
NW with the following conditions:
1. The applicant pay a park dedication fee pursuant to
Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07.
2. That the lot split/variance be subject to a sunset
clause as defined in Ordinance No. 40, Section III(E).
,
- - .,,\~ . '~\}'i-c '\~ '.,\V ---'--J'.~~ .-.-: ['~TH:s'I"'l !. . .J_'..: -Jr;:. :;\!_ :
- ! ~ ~ ..... \'\.1 ~ 'l\. / _ 4 ,,:r- ~:i . . 3' '. r---- c:;;-i~.,:~L,j~~~ I . w O~~ '
.' / ~ . ~:) ~. ';'''i;''I>,'cR~<r ,..,', f-,..,"", ,,~~~.<ai,!:Str.r-, "~r
' . -= , @I" . .. 'I' '.,. 7-ir."1;.<i~.W 0 ''0
~,'" , "---= '~s. ~,"".'''~'f!AT<~''''''I'''''1 ,0.-+1, ", ..' _ 0".', ,. '_';
. F4 " --- II ' ,.' I ~'2NO AOO'4.T'1 ~, ---,....-.. '",':--::,
' fk ~ ' ,.~ ''''FCAR "'REsrt.!Esr~rES' . (' ',.J ' '.;..>'
I .'1 \L . ..... l..r...7. ',-r E7/,.r_~I' ..~
' -. _.. - - -, ~,'. .'J.:,. ~."'ol F..,.,.",,,,,, . .. ,..,.... ,. '''.. _ _ _ _. _
~. ~[ ",""~" ~', ,,-~;;<-.~ ~Rl{, ""vAiu~~/e.'f":"" , " . _____ _~ ___ '
,,~<;, '1'..\1; [f""( '\..~ '\(:. '\ J ~ 'J.,.ESm~S'E1"'4.. ii, i
J /: ~~~. ~~~~lV "'I"'/":'}I"'I'" __"I ~ I ! I 1 ~ "
'---'i ,or. , .,' X"~T ,".;,I)L&':'VJliWj.'.. 'i-!, . 'r ,,:.
~ /. ' ?~ ,-~, \, ~ '" ", I
i:X~:q ,;,.,. .'.,,,: - L.,t:';:(~'I:;fi;t.'i, (t'/, ,,' :6^ . " . I, I--;PRA/R!E.I ./1 , t:d'1 I 'x;~ 0 d- C '/ '
' , :;:':".: r. ';::' " . " PINE . ; I. .
!:i;>'.:~:~:)i" < ._ :"., ii:.. '.1", , ''J'/ I' CREST' . I ' ! '4 ,,~, MEAqOIt'S:s il ' i . , ,!O'OIT/ON '
h:.:.:e;:':':"""','j,iit'! 'j"'j' ";>['<~;}~,'"fo.'~.:;'.:{:}:';;;}_:\;ji:i~G:"O~~"Qj "&" 1 '\ I , ,: J;'; :....;;; ;
~::;~:..,/'"..::',:( .: ";, '}:,:,~\..}:~: - ~ .... -- ~ I 2l'I I ! [I I I
1/':':';';": l' :;;::::':' ", -;....\ _ _ _.~! '
,.<"~":'f:',::',;,))::.;...L.',,, II....:~ _ r"...~ :! : T .iL/ i " i !
i-.~,;,:",:.,:>.. -"":',".'> ....11 ~'" j; -\"",1 , 1''''''-( I !
'..' <,->:. 'r, ',.\],ri I! -F'/I'I, II, I! ",,-' \, I I ' -{ ~ (_~ !_
::.,'c: :~/'::'.': .;~:.<..)(;.;} :-:t- ~ ' ,,! 'f-" Ir'I I" ~~~...~.
:'''<'-::'<''':','':;;'",,!:'~:>: .' ' 'if.1'11": '1'" '.' -; ~ ! If)l "or
',:' '. I .~ ' , ,: - C,....c.:-~ \ ... I / t:
. ,,: ;:.,. .1. , I " ,
1'00...::.' '. .'. ,. ..,....,..,.. " -. -- ~ 'j , ,A~y ~
_. i=-I : j- ' - ~ -)- ',\ ' ,/ ~ . - \.l
-. " " .... - . '" ... \'
i i f--- -. " !--f. ~." / - r=tJ_~. (\.
CASTNER! _:- ,-- . _.' I--- f-. ~ _'0' : , T'''\~ -to Eo,::..:L- I....t
Al)OIT/~N I . -REGISTE!lfO " . " I--- - \ ~,r./j, .1'" ._ ,- ..:. ",. H .
',I -.. l~ - - R~GIST~R~O , -;..,I(r,/. _ ~'t;; _
' .--=:..J. '-' 't:'V' )- _.. / ~ .. 1_ .. _ _ _
'.. . -. f"::-=-' - - t.AN1J.. _SJIRV... L -'~'. --= . . t" Y. ....~_~_ ____; ,
:. '. "-, ~~ViL.-~ NO. 68,,-' · ~/I.'tY-",L.- ',- -=--:J., -(,' ,'~~:~.~
~ _L-_-:~,-' ,-=--~ R 1 : ~ ~~ ~.)\~j Ly---\\ ;, ..'ifi-' Ii: I~. !
~:.-.;!~:. =~u~ v;~ ~ - i d3Ai. :.',UiJ,'J;J;r,J/", I-,r" _:ihJ i; ;, ~;' ',=-
~J~~J::.'!~. ;/,(';;. ':,~~-C '~RiJf-"~ ~HP;NiJI," "~;
, i.t" --.' "~ 11._,)' \ . \, - " I -~-,- I'! HtI!.L.S~:H- -:- :--" .- ,.
Wll -j"r_:~/ ~RLS.', 6J:' .' FO~;' f. TrlfEE -=1: ='!~ r:-'!lA.bn;I~ I [ I
I II i--J ""'-... NO Ti 1---;'; '---'--- _/ . '\..'''n.l i I
' I.lL ~ _ _, 'C'_ ,,, .:T1lt-t 7''1''7[,' ]-r ,
i
: I I
, I.
l~ I/O r:~ 5 . . I. 'I" I I -:; 7 1 'l I..
l v '" - \"\. INp}AN- ,MEAOC/WS n _ . '- . I ',:,:,
!JJ~..) ~ ;-... ~ ... ':'/' :'!' I' . I I I "" '-----'- ~ 4' ,:L;,,;(,;':'
,,1),)(, '-."-. ,I Ii' ~',\",-\-~5_ I lIE.......,::o:.
il/( ~~."',~ ,~'-.t-'-~;_.- ~~~f------_ :~' ..~ ~-;, ;'? ,/. /, t'f 'i'l'~'~'~ '., -'}"c'i,};fi'):Ci;:",',/w':;!u'''''''':;','.
,-~v~ '/~. ' I ,,,- /< _r, ~ .,:......-,...:.::
\~0'~: 'rr.)., R-I f I.A'~'I~~i0\ ~'~lk{.:~.".l!i) ;
" .~. 1">IlI:' m...~_ -- ~'~"-'-'~~' '_'\\,9 .,.. _':: 'A- "-!~~~,~~~;" .." .:'/,"'_ ,
' ; tp,,' "/I"';l":~'~~ 5~~'~--O'~""';J' ";u rp~~'.r L ',' -~ '~(7"~==:j :..:~"'-j:.:::;:-:,:.
J}1jl'": ,I. :\/ ~\ ,: ~~ '~S~ATES '<:..'- z . i ' I' ' ,~CJ;0:.i t ,:,~,,;;.,j:';:,~;!.e
@ ~. : ,.. \1 '....:.-'--J"': ~ I' 111/.'.1 I . ,:/.12 ' ;. g . ':::'~H'-';::~::~.r;~.
'~ /J Ij, . I -. ''---/"T'-_J' I ~ ,:,-,'c\~'.r~~:':\
')~ f...I. ;,~' \' 3! I ~', I """,-o! .'."
,..::::.....- 4~~ "..~~~{~..:..l~.- -r ,)tI. -)' ___ ---",:",01...~ -'- T 1/:, ",: -::<~':,',i~:
RU/J --1?..tEl.s,'" . \ ': rES,T, ",I __ 'Y, I . ,,;,r). ~ ' '."":
\ ':-s.,~ !,.~,' .J '< \ I
!
I
.
, ,
\
:.
'"
I _
~ or -
M N~
I ~
~
(1) VI)
(;}) 2 7
2
..
..
\
)
~
'\
;t".
'"
~
~
"
. .~'1 -'
" . .. -.
~
'.~
i
M
(9)
\ .' t:J
..\Of\ ".
,,~~~. ..,;:
....,,, .
....
U
s t;~..
.",,'
.,""
,
'.
AVE.
J,/-#.II
~.Z?
"360/
~.....
"
)
(u)
;
:--L
A.
~~
p(.
."
. a-v"
M
(~)
I
B
. (\.
~ ,.,.
vf"
ft ZI
_.~~...s;&.$'-_, ;r.H.J4.-I:f JrI..
(8-poq) (8)
)J
./ If ....,.,._1
.:j c.c..l.l = , = WJ
L J3''7.1dr
&~7q)
,..J'(.=,.'
------- ---r--- - ----- - ----
(9of-lo) /65
1~cI:r.;,~' .'
(5j
'\
- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- --
/
/7-
14-)
(;)
~ (9+60)
",
"
,,~
~~
4
-.... ." .z# /
,
.
~~
l ..... ~
.... ~~
~.II Jtl'kw'
_~ I
5
(t1J
.
,
",,./
JJr.''?
6 fe)
<
.
.
e:J
. I
, !
_.
~
.... .,.
~~-
~ ..'
...:L
~,
\:
-x - - - - - -
/".s..
(~)
.ItJ~'"
i. ". ~..,-
~ i'r.~'~ .~ ( :::i...~~cz rr~
A-li.:.
"._c,> --,..
(]),.
,."L"\.
CITY of ANDOVER
, /
LOT SPLIT Jt
"
LOT SPLIT REQUEST FORM
Property Address
15qf0 /f!J-t. Nw f Na.y-(",' Ss-us -Sd- ~
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is appropriate):
Lot
Block
Addi tion
Plat Parcel PIN t< 17 - 32 -';;'-1'- Vl/ -oooz-
(If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason for Request
.~
~ .t? /, '-I
I
b><-;, Jj .41/..
o,ve.
9.9 'I
Ac
/(> .j
i,t/~
jwo
!r,t.
,
, )
Current Zoning
~ ~ i
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Applicant ~L<J k!~,/UJ ids
Address j .is-YO YA~/H-14 5'1 /l/:..J
Home Phone 7 \' J-o:!::J.J Business Phone
Signature ~~ 4<-'~ Date j- ~ - 9,-~
-------------------------------------------~-------------------------
Property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address
Home phone
Business Phone
\ Signature
Date
J _____________________________________________________________________
LOT SPLIT
PAGE 2
Attach a scaled drawing of the proposed split of the property showing:
\ scale and North arrow; dimensions of the property and structures;
) front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent street names;
location and use of existing structures within 100 feet.
The date the property became a lot of record, the n~mes and addresses
of all property owners within 350 feet of the property proposed to be
split, and the complete legal description of the subject property must
also be provided.
I hereby certify that this property has not been subdivided within
the last three years.
~4~Plioant
~._--~
Lot Split Fee: l$l00.00!
Recording Fee: $ 15.00
~"
Receipt It
Date Paid
Park Dedication:
Date Paid
Receipt It
\
)
Rev. 1-07-92:d'A
Res. 179-91 (11-05-91)
;/(j) .
\1'\. "
CITY of ANDOVER
. /
.....--
VARIANCE REQUEST FORM
Isttj#V Itv.(.... JJw d- Nar-ci'S51A '5 ~..J. Alu~
"
Property Address
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is appropriate):
Lot
Block
Addi tion
Plat Parcel PIN r< f7 J;) ;:;>'1 t.;y
(If metes and bounds, attach the comp ete legal)
t>oo"L.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of Request
1/ J!J-,( /4 ,<Ie.....
0-1
r.".n(r/,..-~Jt,.,t?J J1...-
!
;"J.I N/J uA i /. I-
;? ~tJ '
,>(AJ4d
..P w '. ~,.{A. ...4-
..J
JJ....
~..1 cL
) :"1:::;s;~:/;:f~:;:~ah;:~fir
Section of Ordinance [('.0 l. ~ Current Zoning ~-I
-----------------O~~--~~--~-------------------------------------
Name of Applicant ::ro~"/
Address JJ'S'IO VA J:"/......-+
t d.~~/...
Rey.vc jJ,.
AA/&'~ #'tv
".
S.r.3C03
.5'1 A/.u.
Home Phone 7#' Business phone
Signature ~ _ 4~A Date /- & - f7""f,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address
Horne Phone
Business Phone
Signature
Date
\ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
, )
VARIANCE
PAGE 2
\
J
The following information shall be submitted prior to review by the
City of Andover:
1. A scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks;
adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures
within 100 feet.
2. Application Fee: Single Family $ 75.00
Other Requests - $100.00
Date Paid
Receipt #
Rev. 1-07-92:d'A
Res. 179-91 (11-05-91)
CRITERIA FOR GRANTING A VARIANCE
In gr.anting a variance, the City Council shall consider the advice and
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and:
1. If the request is in keeping with the spirit and intent of
, j this Ordinance.
2. If it finds that strict enforcement of this Ordinance will
cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
individual property under consideration.
3. If it finds that denying the request does not deny reasonable
use of the property.
4. Economic considerations shall not constitute an undue hardship
if reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of
the Ordinance.
\
i
PRINTER'S AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
"':"NOTICEOFPUBUC-HWINC'.' '9\~)
. .::il::tr.;'{'fttr~~$~~fl.:'.{\j~\:l
" ....... STATE OF MINNESOTA.- -;: ,,,,..:..:t1
.~: :.;" :-~ ',:,.,:~~-. t:, '; '. .:'_ '., ;' ~-~r; :~:.., > '!:- ',~- _~.:.,'~'-;.' :~~"I
'.; ~ P1~nnjng'.,;d zilnirli t:ofimilisiMOithe. i
.' CitY-'cjtAridOye(.wiILholp.i1 Publlc;~eaiinij:'~j
.. 7:3!l' p.m.. 0.' .s.. soorl)~e(e.(te<:... far>, be,
o he:mt" 0", '1;~d'Y<l'.ou'l)? 2~i ..1993:.t-.th.~
'. . AndOver C'l1il;t.ltt.6SS:.Cro"to'Nn.Bl'P:'NW.~:
. Atido~~;;..~No_,t~i~ieWf\he,:lc?t:.splitJva_Ranu~
reques~of.lol1n'.nd.:V.leri..; ReynoldS" located.
, on thefollowi"g ie9aIIYdew;bed property: :'.
i1r\p!~lte<f~Th~Southeisit Qu.rtero('tlie
. ~.Ist'QUarteiol'Sictrori' 7;ToWn'hip'32; .
: "llail~2.,'Anoka, COun!l'1: M\rineiot";.:...~.pt:
;"I~ ouartet:';svlijtii:i: tq:Hfghi"y..s.i',
. me"~lo;.<;OUftY:o~Al'!,~;'~~r:~_ C~61~,~(~~;
(rx~17.0) (EX.'9200). l~ i., ~~t_,~ ,:..\~ -~ ';:;~J.
l\U ,w'ltt~I)' _''1Il'~erb~t,com''1eQI'' wUl; b.
~"'t-thatti~.~atlotl'f It;. :". 'f'~-'
'J;cop'l: ofth.....ppliCatl~.1)d proposec:l.Jo~
",Ut;~~.v.ir.bl".at;Ariclov<!! City, H~1t .ror
. ;~~JT~~~~~~!~'~';;"~{~~,}~-k~~\~~J
.Vocto.naVoI1(!CIty<CIerll,"",....:H",.,.>-'., i
. alXdefg~ijkl~nopqrSt~:\;:'..~;:.>,,!' :~t-->':~.:_;
':"'>PubHsh~i~ AnOlcJ County Union;';::: ~ j
;:~\.:~-:.:.~ :,; ':'::;'.~J~~J~Jt..~; ~_~~i::':;.::_ :;~ :Et~':
/
/
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
ss
County of Anoka )
Peter G, Bodley, being duly sworn. on oath says that he is the managing editor of the
newspaper known as the Anoka County Union, and has full knowledge of the facts which are
stated below:
(A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification
as a qualified newspaper. as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02. 331A.07. and other
applicable laws. as amended.
(B) Theprinted,. ,NOnCE. .OF.. P.UStIC . HEARING. ..........................,.
. , . . , . . . . . . . . . , , . , . . Reyon 1 ds , , , , , . . ' , ' . . . . . . . . . , . . . , , , , , , , , , , . , . , , . , ' , . . . , . , . ,
which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper. and was printed and
published once each week, for, , . t.WO. . , successive weeks; it was first published on Friday,
the ....15th...... day of ,J.anuary...... 19.93.. and was thereafter printed and
published on every Friday to and including Friday, the ..... 22nd. , . ,. day of
. . .J anua ry, . ., 19. .93; and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabetfrom A to Z.
both inclusive. which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the
composition and publication of the notice:
abcdefghi i kl mnopqrsfuvwxvz
a bcdef ghij klmnopq rs t uvwxyz
BY'
:\lanaging Editor
Subscribed and sworn to before me on
RATEl:'liFOR:\lATION
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by
commercial users for comparable
space
$ 7.00
(Line, word, or inch rate)
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for the
above matter
$ 7.00
(Line, word, or inch ratel
(3) Rate actually charged for the above
matter
4.80
$
(Line, word, or inch rate)
~ ~-::_-.'-
,./QJ~".'..'\
; .l.. ;
\ :
~ i
i ~~
CITY of ANDOVER
"
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, January 26, 1993 at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the lot
split/variance request of John and Valerie Reynolds located on the
following legally described property:
unplatted - The Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter gf
Section 17, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota,
except the South Quarter - Subject to Highway easement to
County of Anoka per F C 6/24/63 (Exi9470)(EX#9200).
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
./
A copy of the application and proposed lot split will be available
at Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
if '. {4~
'_.u-Z:-~ i- "O..(;L./
Victor~a Volk, City
Clerk
Publication dates:
January 15, 1993
January 22, 1993
'.
/
Darin R & Deborah J
Upham
15874 Round Lk Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
Sr ,ley W Knoll
1. ~9 Round Lk Blvd
Andover, MN 55304
Arthur R & stella
Reynolds
15835 Tulip st NW
Andover, MN 55304
stanley W & Barbara
Colburn
15961 Narcissus st NW
Andover, MN 55304
J
file: Lotsplitreynolds
/
Gary W & Joy R Sarner
15820 Round Lk Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
Robert A & patricia Rewey
3470 - 159th Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
Phillip Blake & Pamela
Gatten
15941 Quay st NW
Andover, MN 55304
Duane E Faulkner
15921 Narcissus st NW
Andover, MN 55304
Jeffrey S & Jeorgette
Knoll
3301 - 157th Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
Daniel J & Nancy
3430 - 159th Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
Myron D & Carol C
Moen
15940 Round LK BD NW
Andover, MN 55304
Bryan J & Kristi M
Seline
3353 - 159th Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
February 16, 1993
DATE
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT D
Planning ~
David L. carlberg,
BY: City Planner
APPRO)V~EDf1F R
AGEND.
I
1-
BY: )
\./
ITtM"J Lot Spli t/Variance
'0' 159th & Goldenrod St.
~ ~ -,. -'
...
REQUEST
The Planning and zoning Commission at its regular meeting on
January 26, 1993, reviewed the request for a lot split/variance
by Omar and Jodie Dizayee located at 159th Avenue NW and Goldenrod
Street NW. The applicants are requesting to split a 4.89 acre
parcel into two parcels. The variance request is for lot frontage
on Parcel A and lot area on both parcels. please consult the
attached staff report dated January 26, 1993 and the minutes from
the Planning and zoning Commission meeting for further
information.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and zoning Commission recommends to the City Council
denial of the lot split/variance request.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
, J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION DENYING THE LOT SPLIT AND VARIANCE REQUEST OF OMAR
AND JODIE DIZAYEE TO CREATE TWO (2) PARCELS PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE
NO. 40.
WHEREAS, Omar and Jodie Dizayee have requested a lot split
and variance to create two (2) lots for the sale and construction
of single family homes on the property located at 159th Avenue NW
and Goldenrod Street NW (PIN 13-32~2q-42-0009) legally described
as:
The South Half of the West Half of the West Half of the
Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13,
Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota; Except Roads;
Subject to Easements of Record; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission has reviewed
the request and has determined that said request does not meet the
criteria of Ordinance No. 40; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission finds the
request should be denied for the following reasons:
\
1. That Lot B would not have adequate frontage on a maintained
city street;
I
2. There is a question as to whether or not Lot B would have the
necessary 150' x 150' building pad area as required in Ordinance
No. 10, Section 9.06(a(3);
3. Subject to percolation tests, there is a question as to
whether Lot B is buildable at all;
4. There might be a very problematic situation in crossing
wetlands on the north of the land that is buildable on Lot B; and
5. The request for the variance on Lot A is too large of a
discrepancy from the requirement; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was
opposition to said request; and
,
/
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council denial of the lot split and variance as
requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning and zoning Commission to deny the lot split and variance
on said property.
\
, j
I
,
J
Page Two
Resolution - Lot SplitjVariance
159th Ave. and Goldenrod st. NW
Omar and Jodie Dizayee
February 16, 1993
Adopted by the city Council of the City of Andover on this
16th day of February, 1993.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST
J. E. McKelvey, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
,
, I
i
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 26, 1993
Page 2
\
J
(Public hearing: Lot Split/Variance, 159th & Narcissus, Continued)
The Commission asked for Council interpretation on the park dedication
fees, as they did not know of any cases in which both parcels were
required to pay park dedication.
I
I
I,
Acting Chairperson Jonak opened the hearing for public testimony. There
was none.
MOTION by Pease, Seconded by Apel, to close the public hearing. Motion
carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Dehn, McMullen, Peek) vote.
MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Pease, recommend that the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend the Resolution granting the lot split and
variance request of John and Valerie Reynolds to create two parcels
pursuant to Ordinance No. 40 as compiled and presented by Staff. Motion
carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Dehn, McMullen, Peek) vote. 7:43 p.m.
M. PUBLIC HEARING: LOT SPLIT/VARIANCE 159TH AVENUE NW AND GOLDENROD STREET
\.2!J NW, OMAR AND JODIE DIZAYEE
7:43 p.m. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the request of a lot split and variance
by Omar and Jodie Dizayee to split a 4.89-acre parcel into two parcels
/ each of 2.44 acres. Variances are needed from the 300-front foot lot
frontage requirement on Parcel A and the 2.S-acre lot area requirement
for both parcels. There is a question as to where Goldenrod Street NW
has been constructed. It is thought the street has not been constructed
to where it is shown on City documents. If that is true, a decision
needs to be made as to who will construct and pay for that extension.
There is also some concern about the large variance needed for lot
frontage on Parcel A, which is a very large departure from the
requirement. Mr. Carlberg also noted the Commission may wish to
eliminate the variance for area requirement on Parcel A by subtracting
the needed acreage from Parcel B. Staff is recommending denial of the
lot split because of the large variance to lot frontage, the issue of
construction of Goldenrod Street and the issue as to whether Parcel B is
buildable. The building pad on Parcel B would have to be across the
drainage ditch. If the Commission recommends approval, Staff suggests
the conditions of park dedication and a sunset clause. The park
dedication issue raised in the last item will apply to this lot split as
well.
Acting Chairperson Jonak opened the hearing for public testimony.
Lvle O'Neal, 14303 Lexinqton Avenue - owns the property to the east of
the lots in question. He asked if the intent is to extend Goldenrod
Street to the end of the easement. Mr. Carlberg stated the idea would
be to make Parcel B have frontage to at least where the cul-de-sac
/ should be. Staff did not discuss extending the whole street down the
side of the property.
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 26, 1993
\ Page 3
.'
(Public Hearing: Lot Split/Variance, 159th & Goldenrod, Continued)
Mr. O'Neal - wouldn't want a road all the way down the side of his
property. He is not concerned with the split, but noted the land is
quite swampy on the north end. He agreed with the Staff recommendation
and did not want more roads in order to have more lots.
Cordell Moe, 37S 1S7th Avenue NW - was not concerned about the parcel
being split, but it does raise some questions about the location of his
home. The house was built about ten years ago in the northeast corner
of the property facing north with the permission of the Building
Department, facing the easement that he was to have access to. He
currently accesses his property from 1S7th Avenue. If a house is located
in the lower southeast corner of Parcel A facing 1S9th, he will be
looking at the back of someone's house permanently with no way of
accessing 1S9th or Goldenrod. It will be a big expense to construct
Goldenrod, and no one will be happy; but if it isn't constructed, they
don't get access and Mr. O'Neal cannot subdivide his property. Plus he
will take a large decrease in value because his home sits backwards on
the property. He felt these issues need to be addressed.
Commissioner Apel stated both his parcel and the one to the north are
lots of record, but the owner should recognize these problems and
/ discuss the location of the house with Mr. Moe and possibly work out
some easement arrangements.
Mr. Moe - stated even if 1S9th were brought across, it would not give
him access to the north. He was told ten years ago that Goldenrod would
come south. The Commission and Staff felt it makes sense to run
Goldenrod south to 157th; however, as a practical matter it probably
cannot be done because of the wetlands in the area.
Jane Godfrey, 16069 Goldenrod NW - asked if Staff is saying the existing
cul-de-sac on Goldenrod does not extend to the property of Parcel B.
Mr. Carlberg stated it appears the cul-de-sac stops short of the
property to provide the necessary frontage.
/
Ms. Godfrey - was concerned with splitting the land. She felt a house
could be built on Parcel Ai but Parcel B is all swamp and, in her
opinion, unbuildable. She also didn't see the necessity of extending
Goldenrod at this .time, not wanting to see it extended. She felt it
would be extremely expensive to. construct. The Commission again noted
the difficulty of constructing roads through wetlands because of recent
legislation protecting wetlands. .
Jim Canfield, 16021 Goldenrod NW - stated the cul-de-sac has a 56-foot
radius and is centered exactly on the property lines with a quarter pie
on each lot. Staff noted then the cul-de-sac is short and would not
provide adequate frontage for Parcel B.
Mr. Canfield - stated he split his 10-acre parcel and was required to
pay park dedication fees for only one additional lot, not for both lots.
Neither lot had a building on it at the time.
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 26, 1993
",page 4
, j
(Public Hearing: Lot Split/Variance, 159th & Goldenrod, Continued)
Ken Berqerson, 360 Constance Boulevard - agreed the lot should not be
split at this time. Possibly Goldenrod will be constructed at some time
in the futurei but the way it is now, there is a lot of low land making
the property unbuildable.
Arnold Peterson, 331 lS7th Avenue - asked if an easement can be given to
build on Parcel A. Commissioner Apel indicated a house could be built
on that parcel now with access from l59th.
Mr. Peterson - asked if lS9th will be extended eastward to University
Avenue in the near future and how that would impact Parcels A and B.
Mr. Carlberg stated that would have to be studied to see if it is
feasible. A lot of parcels could be subdivided if the road went to
University Avenue, but there has been no discussion of extending lS9th.
Mr. Peterson - was concerned about the cost of IS9th, plus they would
prefer not to have it go through. The plans don't call for sewer to
that area until 2010 to 2020. They would like to keep the wilderness
back there. There is beautiful lowland back there. They are opposed to
the proposed lot split.
\MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Jovanovich, to close the public hearing.
)Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Dehn, McMullen, Peek) vote.
MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Jovanovich, that the request for lot split
and variance at IS9th Avenue and Goldenrod Street requested by Omar and
Jodie Dizayee be denied for the following reasons: 1) That Lot B would
not have adequate frontage on a maintained City Street; 2) There is
really a question as to whether or not Lot B would have the necessary
ISO x lSO building padi 3) Subj ect to peculation tests, there is a
question as to whether Lot B is buildable at alli and 4) There might be
a very problematic situation when it comes to getting across that
wetland that appears to be north of the land that is buildable. Public
hearing was held. There was a great deal of input, most of it
questioning the lot spliti and nobody speaking in favor of it. Staff
recommends that we deny it. One of the things that Staff was concerned
with is the large variance on lot frontage on Parcel A. Motion carried
on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Dehn, McMullen, Peek) vote. 8:20 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 7.03, SPECIAL
USES - TOWING SERVICES/IMPOUND LOTS
8:20 p.m. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the regulations for towing services and
impound lots in the cities of Minnetonka, Fairbault, Anoka, Blaine,
Minneapolis and St. Paul. All allow the use, some with Conditional Use
\Permits. Those allowing the use without Permits have suggested to Mr.
jCarlberg that the use be allowed with a Conditional Use Permit.
Conditions in the permit vary among the cities but include such items as
fencing and screening, asphalt parking lot in one instance, number of
"
CITY OF ANDOVER
j
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
January 26, 1993
AGENDA ITEM
4. Public Hearing: Lot
SplitjVariance - l59th Ave
& Goldenrod - Dizayee
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
.
BY:
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY'~
1\equel>L
The Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review the lot
split/variance request of Omar and Jodie Dizayee to split a 4.89
acre parcel into two (2) separate parcels or lots. The
applicants are proposing to create two (2) 330' x 322' lots each
consisting of 2.44 acres. Note that these figures are
approximated; a survey will establish the true figures. The
applicant is requesting a variance from the three hundred (300')
foot lot frontage requirement on Parcel A (see the attached
diagram) and the 2.5 acre lot area requirement on both Parcel A
and B.
The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Rural.
Applicable Ordinances
Ordinance No. 40 regulates the division of lots. A lot split is
defined as any division of a lot, parcel or tract of land into not
more than two (2) parcels when both divided parcels meet or exceed
the minimum requirements for platted lots in the applicable zoning
district.
Ordinance No. 40 also allows the City Council to vary
from the provisions in the Ordinance.
Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 establishes the prov~s~ons for
minimum lot width, lot depth and lot area in an R-1 zoned
district. The minimum requirements in an R-l district are as
follows:
Lot Width at Front Setback
Lot Depth
Lot Area Per Dwelling
300 feet
150 feet
2.5 acres.
Ordinance No. lO, Section 9.06(a)(3) requires lots which abut
cul-de-sacs to have a width of at least 160 feet at the front
setback line.
Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07.10 establishes the minimum area of
land dedicated to park and open space. For all subdivisions by
metes and bounds description the subdivider or developer may elect
to pay, in lieu of the park dedication requirements, the sum of
four hundred dollars ($400.00) for each dwelling unit that could
, be constructed upon the proposed subdivided property. In the
event the developer elects to pay said four hundred dollar
($400.00) charge, the City may collect additional park fees if the
developer re-subdivides the property in the future.
Page Two
Lot SplitjVariance - O. & J. Dizayee
159th Ave. NW & Goldenrod St. NW
January 26, 1993
/
Review
The purpose of the lot split is to create two lots for the
construction of single family homes.
The Commission should be aware that there is a question as to
whether Goldenrod street NW has been constructed to where current
City maps show the street. If Goldenrod Street NW has not been
extended or constructed to where it is shown on City documents, a
decision will need to be made by the City Council as to who shall
construct and pay for Goldenrod street NW.
The Commission should consider the variance to the lot frontage
requirement on Parcel A. The variance would be 233 feet. Staff
is unaware of a variance ever given with such a departure from the
requirement.
The Commission should also consider eliminating the variance for
the area requirement on Parcel A by subtracting the needed acreage
from Parcel B.
Commission Options
/
1 .
The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval of
the lot split/variance request of Omar and Jodie Dizayee
located on 1S9th Avenue NW and Goldenrod Street NW.
The Commission finds that based on Section IV of Ordinance No.
40, the City Council may vary the application of any of the
provisions in Ordinance No. 40 and that the variance request
is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive plan and
would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the City of Andover.
If the Commission chooses to approve the lot split/variance
request, the commission should include the following
conditions:
1. The applicant pay a park dedication fee pursuant to
Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07.
2. That the lot split/variance be subject to a sunset
clause as defined in Ordinance No. 40, Section III(E).
2. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend denial of the
lot split/variance request of Omar and Jodie Dizayee located
on 159th Avenue NW and Goldenrod Street NW.
The Commission finds the request does not meet the
requirements of Ordinance No. 40. In denying the request, the
Commission shall state those reasons for doing so.
3. The Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item pending
further information from Staff.
,
Page Two
Lot Split/Variance - o. & J. Dizayee
159th Ave. NW & Goldenrod st. NW
January 26, 1993
j
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the lot
split/variance request due to the following reasons:
1. Parcel A requires to large of a variance to the lot frontage
requirement. The only solution is to construct a cul-de-sac
to city standards.
2. Issue of the construction of Goldenrod Street NW.
3. Issue as to Parcel B being buildable.
Staff recommends the applicants
lot as is presently configured.
prove the lot is buildable.
apply for a building permit on the
The applicant will be required to
\
/
/
I71TI1 .a.vE. NW
--L! II ~~-_It'" - 'A-, j', ,-,-\
"---.\ : ... , I '\ ""O""1I} '( I' P. t ~"'f - CO / i '~';.. -r- '------': < 1
. ", l.o ~ .,.. --____ 76TH AVE. NW
-, (~RO~~~ ~, 1;\ ,\... T ~....)o."" _ y', - .,::
\ I : I ('10, ,"" ~ :-- ' t' /-.
' ,:. r- I' ~
:--:1. \ I ~~ I .; II I \ '7
--,- - , .... -----rn.. ~'7~ i r'
,-,I, -')""~-:''';:'oI~,,~~~-.x_ ",Ij /; WARO\ : I "-~"'v~ c\'r....~~~ ".TH'VUW
,.-1 \,. J)... ~! r>/ \ j)/ 'i\I,II; _ <----- LAKe i : ~~::-,I- r1 ~.l
~''1'\ rlt~:;'.J ,1!....J.: ~\J.J,\~ ~~ rt~ I~ (0 'nROAvE.NW
.~" ,"~ /.... t_'" \ V -;1/ I ~
~,:p ).'< I.! I i'l , 1./ ....J~' I
I ~., , I' I ill - ~ ' ~:', 'J-K y ,12NUUW
:~~:[; _~__L__-fR~~ ,~,-~I\ :~w "n.'.
I" : "11 I :l! I ~~~~" I I r+-
- -~L 1 'r ".... ~ I Ii 1......(,.. ,L~E~ I ~ I ",' ~OTH AVE NW
r ~ I,ll ' \~. ,81RCH1f{)()Q.J;;:;=
~ I I III ! '<" ) '---../ /)', lPOf{Q , t.
"( ! (.. I ~! I I ~ .-.' // Ii" \ 16~TH AVE. HW
~ (";"\, ~i \;;'1 ~ -? Fl/ :
t! -... II, C);' _.I (; Y // I " ...TH AVE. NW
"J llf[ I'" g:, --.L.~ // 1 ."
).., >-, :::'1 1:1 - ~-i/./:
-A-l J J '- I ..L 161TH "YI- NW
'.L ~\. :J,;i;>~! ~.. I il!', '''''' ------T------. ;;~;~i~;--- ...TH AVE. NW
"\ Jv-Il ---:':~:-::'>~l ili ~~ '! '/ 'I r '___\')di 2 '
i- !~~ I : ~~~-;:,~~-..,J: _:,~' r~~S;-, ~11'" / -/1 ' ~, , . n. \{, , ~ "OTH AVE. NW
~.. ;. (~ ..." oJ. '- \>. ~ II' ""<',,-: "_# ~ I --- (/\ \ '
.: n ,t~") I . ,"""-W' i i ! ~ I ,~TH A'" NW
----:I~ : ,.' 'I C "I II [i~ .L::':"C':, i '- I I I \- I
,;;t : ill ~ I ;y~ ....'1.:..... '" ; I I i '\ I _~: I6JROAVLNW
~~, : i I )/'(-----rlf- ,1/ I." """'-. "~ ':: 'I i. i I I.~!. .
.. ( -' I !I Ii' ,\l >'" " ':... . I U #f \1 . ' v
Ji~ :::, ' ~ -~" I' 'I rl ~ ' I ; "',~"," ~1'1f. ~ -K'" " ....0 AVE-'W
I ...- ': , I ' I' ~\', I, 1 :.,
1.- "l~1 c~ [ Ie. h I n I r''-'H,~ ",.'--'~ ~I$T AVE.'W
I II "-~J Iii c '-l\ : ! -'..:~ -j I ""'~~'_~~7~,
! II, I III 1"11' :' I'" I ' 1 '::' ;:t:~:~i\ I, . ... I -~:~'~"Y~{RJ.t?:;
. I : ' . ... .~:~:{:: - lOITH Ave. JfW. .
~ '.:'--/ ---- I:. :-'a;)J~ -; .. "l~ ~ I
I I, i ':~ I' ,I "'''L- ,
Ii It:w. l ' :' I----'Hoa-o~) ! I I.- i ~TH AVE- 'W
i II 'C I" 'ir--, '~'I :.' 2-i I I ~~II
I I 1- 1-1 .~" I! -2. . I ~ -4' ,000HAY..O.
I _ 1.1, ~~~I '~7 ~ I, ~ \ ~.'~! X'.:... \ ,:';);;'~X~ II ~ I "4TH AV" NW
i \ "~;/"' ~~: ". ;Ni-;:c( 'i I H~.
~ I ~ f-Lj' L ..,; ~~~~Q.I~PNrt..,.:-,. ~.;~. I, . .
"'" ---- 1 _____ __ _, . !--l"' :-T'''''''~~'''- "';" I ffiiS...T..........
=-, ~..~, 1R-1 I r.." 11 ~~..~'~,'.,~ I L-ljT _:"" ~~ ~,.): I' 81~
-~ ~t _ I /'.' l'IV'lom, ' t~1" \....) "I :1~~TH.........
T I~ ~J/\': II1I \ J } ^^/ vt~\_! _ ..~
c:-~~-"l': 7> \ II .Itjl: I.r~\\' .'t-,: Il ,~,. ~,,~'" .,~,~~
.., :.: ,'~ I ,III! 1'1.'.( ';I "i' ~ _ "1JA:""~?;.~~
; : ,~;" , .. I ! ,r 1 \\ ....... ~ \ \. ~ ,,'" '"
I
-----j
--'"
--"
I
I
115TH .6.vE. NW
"". . .
-,
~. .. ..... ...... .. .... .
CENTER
SEC. /3
) : ,/r'" , 111
-(eOUN-TY ROAf>-NO. 60 1'~-'-"<;Y~'7w71---~.-;:~1t vVKA:
J.J' I
. .......'#4#:.. ' [ I I
.....1<1. . I A"J~_f"""" ~_. :.,,..otl'~-~"-'J"..
I 1 /!i/~~ '. .....JZ7',,?' 1
I :
..-------..,
)
.,
(251
~,..~'
,tI€'.'~'''''-
,,,r
... I
<(Q::.,
.,
......'i,..,.
...J
/~-------,:I
..," 11
_(.1'--'---.---- ..::h \1
,,--,)A,f ,.,"
.1;"" /11 (.
-.;, , I
. .#{.,t- ". _...___..._....................
.- \ /~?,~.. " .1
,. .-$74dt:J
.
~f~.f,y.J:2.1 JV:-~
(I)
.'
k-
--
3ZZ.'
#"
PARK
~ "-
, ~
~ l"
B.
M
I
I
.s.Y,z"r ;Pl'. ~{' Iv'Yr.1
_ (L _I
Y ;,
-prO-posa"" L: S .
(. I ""-'
I
,
.. ~ -~~. ~ ....,.'
M
3
JJ:.f~l-
III ,\
....\
A
3Zz. I
.i:::i=--
"
. )
h/
(1/)
I
~
iI
~
Z
3
\.
~...
~
\!
...
-'
J;,',.,
j" .1;' flU
.,..4.,.~~~;,;;;~:
;:.;';-~";;f.o "..' U.I-f>
1-
!u.,..., a~~-
-Ib~l-
-COUNTY' R/
.t'ill-l".,:u" W
.. 7',"
/.:,)
"
~
"
~ l
.,
(T)
(7855)
E"Q~fl.R,,,7'.,... e
,. ,
(4)
(;m)
"-;";f ,(r/r .1:;W"4.IN~
,
i
-f- 50
f3J
I
"I
-I'
r
.0 ~.
~,~"\.
CITY of ANDOVER
/
~"-",_._.,-
LOT SPLIT #-
"
LOT SPLIT REQUEST FORM
Property Address
~
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is appropriate):
Lot
Block
Addition
PIN /3- ~z - 24 -4z- ODO 9
attach the comp ete legal)
Plat Parcel
(If metes and bounds,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason for Request
~1~~fY ,,'?{ -+
~rf
J
~~::::~-~::~:~_~:J~:_~::~~~~~~~-~~!-------------------____
Name of APPlicantOtVlrl..-r- d- Juefl'e :D;Z:4. yPf?_ ,
Address I \q 75 EVf',vj r P Off\ S+ C Don k?1(J1 cLS.
Home Phone ~/- 7 / :S~ Business Phone 7S7 - q 83/
~~~::~:::~:':~-~~::--~::~~~:_____~:(:z~~::_____
Property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
,
i.
Address
Home Phone
Business Phone
"', Signature
J
Date
_____N_______________________________________________________________
_.
('
, "'
LOT SPLIT
PAGE 2
;'
Attach a scaled drawing of the proposed split of the property showing:
scale and North arrow; dimensions of the property and structures;
front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent street names;
location and use of existing structures within 100 feet.
The date the property became a lot of record, the names and addresses
of all property owners within 350 feet of the property proposed to be
split, and the complete legal description of the subject property must
also be provided.
I hereby certify that this property has not been subdivided within
the last three years.
~~~
~t"ff. 0 APP~
Lot Split Fee: $100.00
Recording Fee: $ 15.00
Date paid
Receipt It
Park Dedication:
Date Paid
Receipt *
/
Rev. 1-07-92:d'A
Res. 179-91 (11-05-91)
/
PRINTER'S AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
J ,
'"-'" ',N~!I~~~F ,",~,~U~H~'ft:. :~-:', 1
~~< "...~} .: ;arror ANOOVER;'t!:- ,.~ ~,1:~ ,..~
~;~:i;'"';,1~~~i8~~Ng~~~~;:;H{1t,j
; ~T_~~>-p~~n_ni~9;a~d~Zo~ing;_tofr1~~iO_~,or'j
the:,.City o~:~~d#rtw)l~ ~~:ip~bI,k~.~~M':~
.t:7i~~'p:~i:~. i~,i)<>?.I>.'th~'''~=ca'''be:1
. he'~.d....on... ;1:u..~. d."Yr"~.'.~art..., 2.~",. 9.9,. 31.,..t..lh.~'.l
And~vet CltY' .la"':l6M-~ro"~':"" 81v\l~N~d
.. ARdOve;l~~ t~.'revie'i"t~e ..Iot;'pr.tf...n.'~c"l
request ?~.o.m.!:.n(f,l#" PlZay~~ ~t~.~~)
, th,folfowiriglegally descri~ i>,operty-,,,,,, .;.. \
~;T1)" ,outlt ,/l',lt ott~e. \"e.'9'.1I pI th.., west
. . ,~.If o'#>';:N<irt'!w,.'t.,Qua\le~,QI;t/1~South...~
, Qu.rtd:;olSe,:t!oli...3"t<m'~I1ip.},t~'ng<;,24,
. .Ariak.;CouritY~'M\nrt~~ii!.xc"eil ~,o~~:
. SubJe~ to elSel'l1e~_Of. (~~7'~ 'S~~7 it'"!'.~.:, "~~
, ,~~lr.~ittte"N'~i\~fti;~'~~'~~l11en~:!~~;~
:rec~ixN.~l:.and-l9<lliO!', :'.'."""'''.,
:,...~. ' "'. r. tion'and .proJ1'i'.s,ed" t.
',c Ac, .. F'" "llWr . .i\fj~.Mt
"l~:~1dk5.,:L~~~~f1;~K~..
VI(tOM VQlk:City,C.~ri,",c-'l. '''.'''....'..'.'';'; ."'c. "..,1
.~tialefghiiklm!lOpq~~siyz.f;.., ~ ;,':";';;;'1;;'.1
, '>.. u:'~,~.~c., Publisnid i.n'Anob Co; Unlo":.;~ c~:,;.-!
,. ~t';c:ji~:;:~:)]~~)~J~ ~2;lml~;::~.2i~~S~
STATE OF MINNESOTA
County of Anoka
ss
Peter G. Bodley, being duly sworn, on oath says that he is the managing editor of the
newspaper known as the Anoka County Union, and has full knowledge of the facts which are
stated below:
(A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification
as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 33IA.02, 331A.07, and other
applicable laws, as amended.
(B) The printed .... .NOTICE. OF.. PUBLIC. .HEARING...........................
........,............ .Di.zay.ee...............................................,..
which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and
published once each week, for. . t.Wo. .. . successive weeks: it was first published on Friday,
the ....1.~.f:b"..... day of ..~il.lJPQr.Y...., 19.93, and was thereafter printed and
published on every Friday to ~nd including Friday, the .... 22nd. . . . .. day of
. .~il.lJqar.Y. . . ., 19. . 9.~ and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z,
both inclusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the
composition and publication of the notice:
abcdefghi i kl mnOPQl"sIUVW)( vz
abCdefghijknn:pqr~~uvwxyZ
BY: \~ L
~gEdit~r
.,..",
Subscribed and sworn to before me on
. . 22nd. . "'~anuarY
.,1993
RATE INFORMATION
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by
commercial users for comparable 7.00
space $
(Line, word, or inch rate)
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for the 7.00
above matter $
(Line, word, or inch rate)
(3) Rate actually charged for the above 4.80
matter $
(Line, word, or inch rate)
)
,~
CITY of ANDOVER
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, January 26, 1993 at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the lot
split/variance request of Omar and Jodie Dizayee located on the
following legally described property:
The south half of the west half of the west half of the
Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13,
Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota; Except Roads;
Subject to easements of record.
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
A copy of the application and proposed lot split will be available
at Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
,l' ~- d~
~~I.I
Victor~a Volk, City
Clerk
Publication dates:
January 15, 1993
January 22, 1993
Clayton H & M W Orttel
428 Constance Blvd
Andover, MN 55304
'11 T & Kristen A Knock
"-..1833 Ilex NW
Andover, MN 55304
Neal D & Jane A Godfrey
16069 Goldenrod NW
Anoka, MN 55304
David E & Pamela J
Breyen
275 - l57th Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
'\
file: Lotsplitdizayee
"
/
Richard D & Lisa M Blackwell
475 - l59th Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
Lyle D & Lavonne O,Neal
14034 Lexington NE
Anoka, MN 55304
James A & Virgene Canfield
16021 Goldenrod NW
Andover, MN 55304
Arnold A Jr & D J Peterson
331 - 157th Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
Charles J & A Loegering
15883 Ilex NW
Andover, MN 55304
David & Loretta
Sunderland
260 Constance Blvd
Andover, MN 55304
Kenneth R & J A
Bergerson
360 Constance Blvd
Andover, MN 55304
Cordell R & Marliss
Moe
375 - 157th Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE
February 16, 1993
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
Discussion
~5.M Emmerich property
~~ Watts' Garden Acres
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
~
David L. Carlberg
City planner
APPRO. (AE FOR
AGQ~A
BY:!
/
BY:
The city Council at their February 2, 1993 meeting discussed, as a
part of the rezoning for Echo Ridge, the zoning of the property
owned by Tony Emmerich located east of the Echo Ridge Plat, south
of the proposed Commercial Boulevard and west of Hanson Boulevard
NW. The Council questioned whether the zoning on the property
should remain I, Industrial or be down-zoned to be more conducive
with the residential area to the south and west.
Attached is Section 7.0l, Permitted Uses and Section 7.03, Special
Uses in regard to GB, General Business and I, Industrial zoning
classifications. The Council should note the differences between
the two districts in both permitted and special use sections. In
Section 7.01, Permitted Uses, the I, Industrial district includes
uses that are permitted in the GB, General Business District and
in addition allows building materials or lumberyards and school
bus terminals. In Section 7.03, Special Uses, both districts
allow similar uses except in the GB, General Business District,
drive-in businesses and used vehicle sales are allowed by the
granting of a Special Use Permit, but are not allowed by Special
Use in the I, Industrial District. The Industrial District under
Section 7.03 allows by Special Use Permit, retail trade and
services and the sale and storage of new and used auto parts
within a building only. It should be noted that retail trade in
services, allowed by Special Use Permit in the I, Industrial
District, is a permitted use in the GB, General Business District.
Based on the following facts the Council should make a decision at
thi s time.
Note: The zoning of the property owned by the Mardaus' in
question at the February 2, 1993 meeting is zoned R-4, Single
Family Rural and not I, Industrial as believed by the applicant.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
I I ,r
FZD I
30 ::.
-; -
Lc::>i DIMEN:5ICJN
?' ReAR 'lA
::. T 3p..c. K
J
liS!. .._T<O)
TYPICAL LOT DETAIL
. - - --
p..ogc.r D, f D...rlc.nc A: Strc.lc.h.
r-,....,..-'.
I EX"" I
I 13LPG.. t I I
L___:.J
JlJ' [)"i~iVti'''o/ er,,:.(; ~ -- +
r-l '5 '5.
I- J
t \
\ 7 1
'- 0_1
I .j::. -
, :~ ~
, 1", i 'I), .
/ :;. \L ..~
~: () ..lfl
.I"'WI
"
" Z :t:'
/: :i F2
f>~ I r- 0
: ',.()Z,
" <I{:' l
/- ill. ' f-
I
I
I
1
., ,"
I
1''-.-. '-.
\ "
I
T
I
1
\
I
I
I
I
\
\
\.
-I
I
--1f()tJH'17' DI"
T AIVa.c4.. ,
IZON1hO: HI
I
I
I
I
.'. R-4
-: 1l.' '.i!.i;';::t2~i?
- ..,.;........~,,~~,+...
'.:. ~:. t7~.~ .;,; . ,~~.-.. :- :.t,
.'
o
>
..1
CD
~'.
.,. -'
.' ~,..----=--
" .. ''::I,.,. ...c'
i~:~b
f:.~~:}.J.. i;;. \
~--
,~... .
... ,-. "'l"~- .
:~~;.~\~~:~ ~ .
'...TOi,.
. .... <: / -~~...::
,:~;:r: ~ C
'.' """-c'
.. 1'1---
.. ~...
.~.
."t ..-" -
.!'.rBenCt
., . . ...
...--'1<:>
~:. Totsl
;::~
"
. -
.....:.~..,;H
. :.;)klter
.::C:~J,~
, :~:pijir(
~~.~
~~.
ProposedZc
."
Ordinance No.8, Section
SC Shopping Center District
.~}; 1.01
, 'or\.
( , 5
.~ U~ GB
1'~r~J "
All uses permitted in "NB" District.
Drop-in Child Care Center (SQQ, 5-19-S7)
General Business District
Agencies selling or displaying recreational
vehicles, boats and marine equipment.
Commercial recreation, not including massage parlors
Day Care Centers
Financial institutions
/
Hotels and Motels
Manufacturing (limited)
Medical and dental clinics
Mini-storage
Mortuaries and funeral homes
New vehicle sales
private clubs, lodges, and assembly halls
professional offices
Professional studios
Public owned and operated property
Rental businesses
Repair services
Research laboratories
Restaurants
Retail trade and services
Service stations
Theaters .
Vehicle wash establishments
veterinary clinic or hospital with no outside pens
vocational trade, business and technical schools
(, /
-
Warehouses
Wholesale businesses (SWW, 10-6-S7)
Page 54
Ordinance No. S, Section
(SVVV, 12-17-91)
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS:
/
I Industrial District
~ Building materials or lumber yard
"
Manufacturing (limited)
Medical and dental clinics
Mini-storage
Professional offices
Professional Studios
Rental businesses
Repair services
Research laboratories
Service stations
Q8School Bus Terminal (8VVV, 12-17-91)
Vehicle wash establishments
Veterinary clinic or hospital with no outside pens
Warehouses
Wholesale businesses
Veterinary clinic or hospital with no outside pens
(SYY, 11-03-S7)
7.02 Permitted Accessory Uses
Within the following districts, the listed uses shall be permitted
accessory uses:
In All Residential Districts
Keeping of domestic animals (three [3J or less except in
R-1)
.Open, off street parking space (8BBB, 5-17-S8)
Gardening and other horticultural uses
Keeping of not more than two (2) boarders or roomers by
a resident family with no private cooking facilities
l
Private garages
Home Occupations, not requlrlng the use of an accessory
structure and/or exterior storage. (8MMM, 5-15-90)
Page 55
Ordinance No. S, Section
Liquor License (SL, 7-21-S1)
Motels (SZZ, 3-15-SS)
/
"
NB Neighborhood Business
Outdoor display only during operating hours
Service station after minimum 2,000 sq. ft. of
retail floor space is constructed.
Veterinary clinic or pet hospital with no outside
pens
SC Shopping Center
Car Wash after a minimum 25,000 sq. ft. of retail
floor space is constructed
Drive-in businesses or businesses with a drive-thru
window (8zz, 3-15-SS)
Liquor, dancing, tavern or live entertainment
,
\ .
/
1.03
L /ltt };ol\
:J ~ UseS ~B
~tf-il1'
Liquor License (SL, 7-21-S1)
Outdoor display, sales or storage during operating
hours only
Service station after minimum 25,000 sq. ft. of
retail floor space is constructed
Veterinary clinic or pet hospital with no outside
pens
General Business District
Adult Use Businesses as defined in Ordinance *92 and
as amended. (SNNN, 7-17-90)
Advertising Signs (8JJJ, 5-16-S9)
4D Drive-in businesses or businesses with a drive-thru
window (8WW, 10-6-87)
Liquor License (SL, 7-21-81)
Outdoor display, storage and sales
Public utility structures
Repair 'garage (8WW, 10-6-S7)
~Used vehicle sales (Sww, 10-6-S7)
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS:
,
(.:... /
I Industrial Districts
Adult Use Businesses as defined in Ordinance *92 and
as amended. (8NNN, 7-17-90)
Page 58
Ordinance No.8, Section
7 - ~//';_ 0 i [c. 0
.O~ c;:/~ v..Y'-
,
,
/
Advertising Signs (8JJJ, 5-16-89)
Liquor License (8L, 7-21-81)
Outdoor display, storage and sales
Public utility structures
~epai-r garages
~Retail trade and services
~sale and storage of new and used auto parts within a
building only (8Y, 6-05-84)
IN ALL DISTRICTS:
Antennaes in excess of thirty-five (35') feet in height.
Ar~a identification signs in all projects of five (5 a.l
acres or more. (8JJJ, 5-16-89)
Blacktop or crushing plant for highway materials.
Commercial animal training.
Decorations, banners, and other temporary signs
advertising a bazaar, special sale, sporting event or
other similar situation. (8JJJ, 5-16-89)
,
Excavation, except when a building permit has been
issued.
)
Marquees of any type, with or without signs. (8JJJ, 5-
16-89)
Planned Unit Developments meeting the requirements of
Section 4.18 and minimum standards required by this
Ordinance.
Public utility structures or uses except when conducted
upon public ,right-of-way. (8zZ, 3-15-88)
Real estate signs over thirty-two (32 s.f.) square feet
per lot frontage and exceeding other sign area limits in
business and industrial areas shall require a Special
Use Permit. (8JJJ, 5-16-89)
Signs on benches (not in City Parks), newsstands,
cabstand signs, bus stop shelters and similar places.
(8JJJ, 5-16-89)
The use of sea~ch lights, banners and similar devices.
(8JJJ, 5-16-89)
7.04 Uses Excluded
\
I
In All Districts:
Auto reduction yards
Page 59
Andover Planning and zoning Commission
Minutes - January 26, 1993
Page 4
/
(Public Hearing: Lot Split/Variance, 159th & Goldenrod, Continued)
Ken Berqerson, 360 Constance Boulevard - agreed the lot should not be
split at this time. Possibly Goldenrod will be constructed at some time
in the futurei but the way it is now, there is a lot of low land making
the property unbuildable.
Arnold Peterson, 331 IS7th Avenue - asked if an easement can be given to
build on Parcel A. Commissioner Apel indicated a house could be built
on that parcel now with access from IS9th.
Mr. Peterson - asked if IS 9th will be extended eastward to University
Avenue in the near future and how that would impact Parcels A and B.
Mr. Carlberg stated that would have to be studied to see if it is
feasible. A lot of parcels could be subdivided if the road went to
University Avenue, but there has been no discussion of extending lS9th.
Mr. Peterson - was concerned about the cost of IS9th, plus they would
prefer not to have it go through. The plans don't call for sewer to
that area until 2010 to 2020. They would like to keep the wilderness
back there. There is beautiful lowland back there. They are opposed to
the proposed lot split.
,MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Jovanovich, to close the public hearing.
IMotion carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Dehn, McMullen, Peek) vote.
MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Jovanovich, that the request for lot split
and variance at IS9th Avenue and Goldenrod Street requested by Omar and
Jodie Dizayee be denied for the following reasons: 1) That Lot B would
not have adequate frontage on a maintained City Streeti 2) There is
really a question as to whether or not Lot B would have the necessary
ISO x ISO building padi 3) Subject to peculation tests, there is a
question as to whether Lot B is buildable at alli and 4) There might be
a very problematic situation when it comes to getting across that
wetland that appears to be north of the land that is buildable. Public
hearing was held. There was a great deal of input, most of it
questioning the lot spliti and nobody speaking in favor of it. Staff
recommends that we deny it. One of the things that Staff was concerned
with is the large variance on lot frontage on Parcel A. Motion carried
on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Dehn, McMullen, Peek) vote. 8:20 p.m.
I\{). PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 7.03,
t!Y USES - TOWING SERVICES/IMPOUND LOTS .
SPECIAL
8:20 p.m. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the regulations for towing services and
imoound lots in the cities of Minnetonka, Fairbault, Anoka, Blaine,
Minneapolis and St. Paul. All allow the use, some with Conditional Use
,Permits. Those allowing the use without Permits have suggested to Mr.
) Carlberg that the use be allowed with a Conditional Use Permit.
Conditions in the permit vary among the cities but include such items as
fencing and screening, asphalt parking lot in one instance, number of
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 26, 1993
'Page 5
/
(Public Hearing: Amendment/Ordinance 8, 7.03/Towing-Impound, Cont.)
cars, hours of operation, etc. The proposed amendment before the
Commission would allow vehicle impound lots in Industrial Districts by
Special Use Permit. It is limited to impound lots since towing services
are consider an accessory use to a number of uses such as repair
garages, auto recycling yards, etc.
The Commission discussed the requirement of Minneapolis for an asphalt
parking lot to keep the liquids leaking from wrecked cars from getting
into the soil. They noted the new regulations the auto recycling yards
are facing to contain the liquids from vehicles they dismantle.
Robert Lund, 13929 Ouinn - stated he is the one requesting permission to
operate an impound lot. He stated cars that have been in accidents are
already low on fluids. If there are drippings when a vehicle sits for
30 days, that would eat away the blacktop. He didn't know the answer but
felt that something else will probably have to be done. Commissioner
Apel thought the recyclers are dismantling the vehicles on concrete
floors, then moving them. Possibly the towing lots will also have to
have a special staging area for this. No decisions were made on the
specific items to be included in a Special Use Permit.
MOTION by Pease, Seconded by Jovanovich, to close the public hearing.
:Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Dehn, McMullen, Peek) vote.
MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Pease, that we accept and recommend to the
City Council approval of the amendment to Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03,
Special Uses in Industrial Districts as presented by Staff, specifically
to add to that list "Vehicle Impound Lots." Motion carried on a 4-Yes,
3-Absent (Dehn, McMullen, Peek) vote. 8:38 p.m.
SKETCH PLAN--KADLEC CONSTRUCTION INC., SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21
Mr. Carlberg reviewed the sketch plan of Kadlec Construction located
east of Round Lake Boulevard in the vicinity of l53rd Avenue. The plat
will consist of 14 lots, 2.S acres in size. One lot will face Round Lake
Boulevard and will require a variance. The back portion of the plat is
presently in Ag Preserve which will be decertified on February 27, 1993.
The only question by the Staff is where IS3rd Avenue enters at Round
Lake Boulevard, as there may be a jog to the street coming from the
west. The City and county will work on this item. The developer will
also be required to do a Tree Protection Plan.
Harvev Kadlec, Develooer - stated 1S3rd is within 10 feet of the
entrance from the west. Because Round Lake Boulevard is such a highly
traveled road, the Commission was concerned that the intersection at
IS3rd meet properly. Otherwise they generally agreed with the sketch
': plan as proposed.
Mr. Carlberg stated this will be on the February 16, 1993, City Council
agenda.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
February 16, 1993
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
BY: Ci ty Planner
?OR"
ITEM Amend Ordinance No. 8
N~ Section 7.03
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to review the proposed
amendment to Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03, which would allow
vehicle impound lots in an I, Industrial District with the
granting of a Special Use Permit. The Council should review the
attached minutes and staff report from the January 26, 1993
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning & Zoning Commission on January 26, 1993 made the
motion to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance amendment.
Attached for Council review and approval is the amendment to
Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03, Special Uses.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
\
~
,
.J
,
)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORD NO. 8
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, KNOWN AS THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No.8, is hereby amended as follows:
SECTION 7.03
SPECIAL USES.
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS:
I Industrial Districts
Adult Use Businesses as defined in Ordinance #92 and as
amended.
Advertising Signs
Liquor License
Outdoor Display, Storage and Sales
Public Utility Structures
Repair Garages
Retail Trade and Services
Sale and storage of new and used auto parts within a
building only
Vehicle Impound Lots
NOTE: All other sections of the zoning Ordinance shall remain as
written and adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 16th day
of February, 1993.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
\
)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
January 26, 1993
AGENDA ITEM
5. Public Hearing
Amend Ordinance
No.8, Section 7.03
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
BY:
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
l;L
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review the
proposed amendment to Ordinance No.8, Section 7.0s, Special Uses.
The amendment would allow towing services/impound lots by the
granting of a Special Use Permit in the I, Industrial District
zoning classification.
REVIEW
This item was tabled at the January 12, 1993 meeting pending
further information being received from the League of Minnesota
Cities (LMC). Staff received other city ordinances regulating
towing services/impound lots from the LMC on Thursday, January 21,
1993.
Ordinances received from other cities include: Minnetonka,
Faribault, Rochester, West st. paul, Shorewood and Madison.
Of these ordinances, the City of Minnetonka and the City of
Faribault seem to be the only useful documents.
The City of Minnetonka requires within a I-l, industrial district,
a conditional use permit for towing businesses. However,
Minnetonka does not allow the impounding of vehicles at the
location of the towing service. Attached are the sections of the
ordinance that apply.
The City of Faribault requires a conditional use permit in a C-2,
commercial district for vehicle storage associated with towing
businesses. Attached is the portion of the ordinance indicating
the conditions or requirements of the permit.
The Commission should consider the conditions imposed by both
Minnetonka and Faribault. Those of most importance are the
screening of the vehicles, fencing, landscaping, number of
vehicles associated with the operation, hours of operation,
percent land coverage and location of the impound lot.
Staff will be presenting additional information from a phone poll
of other cities in the area who have impound lots at the meeting.
I The proposed amendment is attached for Commission review.
)
i
~11 n ~ -feJ f7 Ie CL
Zoni~g Ordi~~ce
Sec-=ion 300.2'3.
?aee 82
SZCTION '300.20.
I-1 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
SUEDIVISION 1. PURPOSE. T~e purpose o~ ~he I-1
d~s~ric~ 1s to provide a dis~ric~ ~or indus-=rial uses in
areas so desi~ated in the comprehensive plan. Development
y~thin the district shall be re~lated ~h~cugh ~he
per~ormance standards outlined in section 300~28 o~ this
or~nance to promote sensitive site desi~ and to mitigate
external site impacts.
SUEDIVISION 2. P~~~ITT~ USES. Within the I-l distric~
no s~ruc~u:e or land s~all be used except ~or a warehouse,
storage, man~acturing, processing, service, Wholesale or
research use occurring wit~1n an enclosed bUilding, except
as provided ~or in subdivision +.
SUEDIVISION 3.
the rollo....~ng
subordinate to
ACCESSORY USES. Within the I-1 distric~
uses shall be permitted provided they are
and associated ....ith a permi~ted use:
- \.
o~~ices not exceeding ;0 percent of the gross ~lccr
area o~ the principal st:,uc~ure; ,
b)
living quarters for
are lccated ~thin the
security pe~sonnel, provided ~hey,
principal s~~ucture:
c) overnight, outside storaee of vehicles,. provided ~he
vehicles are associated with the business and ar e
screened from view ~:'cm residential prope:'ties or
public vie....s;
d)
outside storaee, including fuel storaee,
screened ~rom general public view;
provided
" ..
.. ~
. -
-""
.~ }
retail or service uses not exceeding 2S percen~
gross ~loor area o~ the principal structure;
'" '"' ..
\"..-
c~
~) receive-only" satellite dish antennas and other antenna
devices subject to 'the requirements ~ound in section
300.28, subd1v~sion 13;
g) other uses customarily associated w~~h but subord1na~e
to a permitted use, as deter:1ned by the city.
SUEDIVISION 4..' CONDITIONAL USES. >fWi thin. the ~ ")_v
district no land or structure may be used ~or the ~ollo __~' 71
except by conditional use permit and in'con~oT:ance with
the standards contained in section 300.21 or this.
ordinance:
a)
heliport;
~
Zoni.:g Or di.:
Sec-::ion 300.20'
Page 83
b)
retail,
~~:'cen~
or service
o~ the gr.oss
uses occupying bet~een
area o~. the. principal s~ruc1:ure; .
c) ce:reteries;
c..) ~ ~~as ;
e) pUblic b~ldings or :acilities;
~) transient sales;
vehicle tcwi"g businesses;
auto oocy re?air ~.~ painting businesses; or
(added 6/6/88 by Ord. 88-500)
i) other uses similar to those permitted in this section, as
determined by the city.
SU3DIV!S!ON 5. D!STR!CT
1~' ~~e !-1 ~S~~~C~ s~all
~ith tl:le ~0110~1ng:
STA..~A..tt!lS . No building or land
ce usee except in con=or~~"ce
c) sic.e and rea: yard setbacks: m:!.n~um setbacks shall ce
in accor~ce with the :ollowing ~hen ceas~e~
~rom land.desig:ated accordingly in the comprehensive
plan:
1,) 70 ~eet from lo~ density res1d.en:tial ;
.
2) 50 teet f~OCl cedium and .high densi t7- residen-::ial;
3) 30 ~ee't ~rom ccc:ercial, o~fiee and institu-::10nal;
4-) 20 :-ee't trcm 1:1cius-;:-ia.l and public park.
d)
e)
~loor area ratio: caximuc of 1.0.
lct coverage: cax:!.:u: lot
and shall be calcula-::ec. -::0
parking areas; d..r1ve~ass;
areas and O1:her areas
sur~ace .
coverage shall be 85 percen~
include building t'ootprin-::s;
loading, storage and tras.::.
covered by any icpervious
t') access: bY. percit t'rom the appropriate public!,
authorit7 ~ith principal access from a collector or .
arterial, road~as as designated in the,comprehensive
plan or a st:eet speoi~icall.7 designed to accoc:odate
industrial tr~t'ic.
l
,
I
I
I
I
./
I
,
,
I
I
,
.,---"-- -
/
~
i
,
Zoning Ordinance
Section 300.21
Page 97A
. STn:D!V!S!ON' 6. .S?=:C!:;'!C S'rAlrnA..':crJS IN I-i INDUSTRIAL
D!S~R!C~. ~~ ~d~~~on ~o ~~e s~andar~ spec~~~ed l~
sub~v~sion 2, no con~~ion~ use pe~~i~ shall be g~a=ted
,~~~ss ~~~ =~~J ce~=~~ ~e~s:~=~s ~=a~ eac= c~ t~e
:f'ollow:.~g s~and..ard..:s W'i.ll be met:
/ ,
,
. ,
a)
. ,
I
heli~or~s: ~he
subdiVision 3 g)' 1)
section sh~l app17.
b)
same s ~ and..ar d..:s
th:ougll 5) ,
as . speci~ied i=.
1~clus1ve, of ~his
ret~l or serVice
pe~cen"t of' ~he gross
uses ccc~~y~:g bet~een 25 a=d 50
area of' ~he pri:cip~ st~uctu~e
sh~l be
bUild.i~g:
2) shall, ha.ve no outside storage or displ2.7 a.r.d no
accessory struo~ures; and
3)
-=)
1)
exterior
no
Qodi:f'ica~icns ~o the
shall have s~:f'icien~ park1:g, consis~e:c.~
stand..ard..:s specified i~ section 3~~.28
or~~ance .
'J""f.""" -,"" Q
_...,_ 1.__
c~ th:..s
cemeteries; ~he
sub~vis10:c. 3 k) 1)
section sh~l applJ.
d)
same s ~ andar ds
.'~"ou-;., A)
-..... 6- .. I
as specified i~
i=clusive, of this
mari~as; "the same sta.r.d.ards
subdivision 3 1) 1) "throug: 5),
section shall apply.
e)
as specified i=.
i~clusive, of this
,ublic bu11di~gs or facilities:
spec1~ied i: subdivision 3 c)
app ly .
the same s~a.::.d..ar d as
of' this sec~:!.on shall
'f) t:-ansient sales: the same standards as specified in
subdiv~sion 4. 0) 1) ~hrougll i~), inclusive, if this
section shall apply.
,
j
,vehicle towi~g busi~esses
there shall be no i:pou:c.d lot on the proposed
location:
2) no e~erior storage ot unlicensed and i~operat1ve
vehicles:
3)
4.)
5)
any 'exterior storage of'
aw~ti~g service shall
adjacent properties:
towed vehicles or vehicles
oe screened f~om view o~
sh~l not
reSidential
be looated
zon1~g district;
W'i.th1n
a=d
20~
feet
0::'
hours of
council
residential
impacts.
opera~ion 'cay be limited by the city
if deemed appropriate to protect
properties i~ "the area from adverse
_ hrii:au)f
I~~___f~ll~~iQg___~~~~__~~g__g~Q~~~~l~__Q~~~iQitgQ__iQ__~Q~__:~=g:
Qi~!~i~t~__e~i~~~~__~~t~il_-1Q__f~~~_~t~QQiQg_~!~H~!~~~~~_~~~n_~~~
~l~tning___~tQ~~~~__~S~Q~s~g~__g~Q~g~~~__~QQ__Qt~~~__~imils~__Y~~~
~~~~~~~g_f~~_tn~_:~=~:_~~~~HQit~_~~mm~~~i~l_Qi~!~i~t~
21 Re~ai11Isa1e$lllexa~~1eiIIIIS~~e~~a~~e~zlll~e~a~~~en~1Is~~resl
Ma~dwa~elland/3pe~ia1~tlsaZes1/
31 Sery io:esl I lex a~~1ei I l~e'2lio:aZ 10:1 i'.ni~sl Il1an~$1 Ipar~in!ll 1.z:i~zl Ire""
~ai't'/st>i0~91/
~1 ~0d;in!lllexa~p1eill~0~elsll~0~e1s1
51 ~n~er~ain~en~lllexa~~leiIIRes~a~ran~sll~arslldinne~/~t>iea~~es1/
l~rd/I~0/177""S{IS~~seo:~i0n/71
(c) Permitted accessory uses.
1) All permitted accessory uses as allowed in a "e-1" Neighbor-
hood Ce.rllmercial District.
2) Off-street parking as regulated by subdivision 4 of this
ordinance including semi-trailer trucks.
~~ Q~~--~s~~__fs~ili!~__s~__sn_s~~g2~Q~~_H~g_t~_s_Q~in~iQsl_s~!i-
~i!~~Q~Q~~Qing__~~~~iSg__~~Sl~~i~~1~__tQ_~~Q1Q~gg~_Qf_t~st_s~-
~i~i~~~
~~ e~~g~2~~~__~gtsil__s~__s__~~~~nQs~~__s~~~~itit~_te_S_Qg~~it!gQ
use.
~-r ~ondit ional -Llses:) /""':'
~ ~t~t~~Q~-~=s:_Qi~t~i~!~_Q~_~t~~~t~~g_Q~_lsQQ_~n~ll_Qg_Y~~Q_fQ~
!ng__f~11Q~iQg__~~~~__2~__y~g~__QggmgQ_~i~ils~_Q~_t~g_~i!~_~Q~QSil
~itnQ~t__~Qt~iniQg_s_SQQQi~i~Qsl_~~g_Qg~mi!_~~sQ~QiQg_tQ_tng_~gg~-
l~!iQQ~_Qf_~HQQi~i~iQQ_g~_Q!-!ni~_Q~QinsQs~~
/
~
!~0ndi~idna111~$e$71Ire~~irellaII0:0ndi~i.z:inaZ/~$e/per~i'~/~ased/~~dn
pr00:ed~re$llse~llf0r~t>illi'n/and/re!l~1a~e'2l/~YI$~~'2liYi'$i0n/22/.z:if/~t>ii$
0rdi'nanlZ!ei
1) Dr'ive-in and convenience food establishments provided that:
a) The architectural appearance and functional plan of the build-
ing and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing build-
ings or area so as to cause impairment in property values or
constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance.
of the lot.
b) At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not
less than five (5) feet shall be landscaped and screened in
ce:.mpliance with subdivision 3, (J) of this ordinance.
c)
Each light standard island and all islands in the parking lot
landscaped or covered.
/
d)
Parking areas and driveways
abutting residential districts
.:., (J) and 4 .=,f th is ordirlance.
shall be screened from view of
in compliance with subdivision
j
The es~ablishment of an outdoor enclosure, beer garden or
patio as an accessory use to a bar, restaurant or club licens-
ed to sell intoxicating e.r nonint':,xicating liqIJ<:.r, provided
that:
a) The structure shall be contiguous ~o the principal building
which is licensed to sell intoxica~ing or nonintoxicating
liquor and conform to the same setbacks of the principal
bui ld ing.
b)
The conditional use
or deFined area and
tions of the property,
permit shall only aoply to the approved
shall not be transferable to other por-
without prior approval of the city.
cl The primary access and egress shall be from the main premise
or structure and no other access or egress. shall be allowed
other than those required emergency exits.
d) The premise shall be deFined or structurally constructed so
as to prohibit the free passage of any person or substance
fre,m the area.
e)
The
wood
asphalt,
area shall have a permanent surface of concrete,
or other fabricated construction material.
f)
The area arId
as to screen
cor,stitute a
ties.
surroundings shall be so landscaped or designed
the enclosure from the outside area and not to
blighting influence from the abutting proper-
g)
An employee shall
responsibilities of
area.
be assigned at all times of operation the
supervision of the activities within the
h) Sound equipment which amplifies music or voice shall not be
permitted within the outdoor enclosure, and all other noise
shall be so controled in a manner which is not objectionable
due to intermittence, beat, frequency, shrillness or volume
and shall be in compliance with and regulated by the State of
Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, Minnesota Code of
Agency Rules, as subsequently expanded, modified or amended.
il If any prc.visic,ns or cor,ditiorlS e,f the c,rdinance arS! Y'Je,t filet
as it relates to outdoor areas serving intoxicating liquor,
the chief of police can administratively suspend the ~ondi-
tional use permit. Upon suspenSion, the city council and/or
planning commission shall hold a public hearing and consider
revocation or suspension of the conditional use permit.
JI The provision of S~lbdivisie'n 33(bl, (51 e,f this c,~'dirlaY'lce are
considered and satisfactorily met.
ehicle storage associated with, but not limited to vehicle re-
pair shops, towing businesses and motor fuel stations, provided
that:
~
)
~
Not more than ten (10) inoperable vehicles may be stored at
any time on the premises.
The premises is screened according to SUbdivision 3(J) of the
Zconing CC'de.
Fencing and Screening is absolutely required whereever vehi-
cle storage is within view Or adjacent to a public right-oF_
way, ay,d wherever vehicle storage is within c.y,e hUndred (101i))
Feet of a bUilding on an adjacent property.
The city may determine that Fencing and screening is not re-
quired along Open space areas, wood, or otherwise unsable or
unoccupied land, however the boundary must be then landscaped
or planted with vegetation in a manner determined acceptable
by the conditional Use permit.
e)
Fences eXisting in good repair
a conditional use permit, but
height, may Serve to meet the
however, that the ninety (90)
tained Or achieved.
at the time of application For
which are only six (6) Feet in
Fencing reqUirements, prOVided,
percent opaqueness can be main-
F) Vehicle storage operations existing at the time of the pass-
age of this ordinance shall be required to provide on halF of
the amount of required Fencing and screening designated in
the conditional use permit within one (1) year. Within two
(2) years the entire designated amount shall be prOvided.
/
g) All vehicle stc::.rage takes place iy, the rear yard.
h) The premises provides adeqllate drainage.
i) The premises is grassed, treated or otherwise surFaced to
provide adequate dUst and weed control.
J) No vehicles or parts thereoF shall be placed For any time
upon pUblic property.
k) The city reserves the right to impose any Further particular
conditions which it deems necessary is a given situation.
1~ ~~~~~-_li9~2~__~~!~Eli~Q~~~E~~_Q~_~~Q_~ff=~~1~_li9~Q~_2EQ~~~_~Q~~~
!Q~-Q~i~SiQ~1_~S!i~iE~_i~~21~~2_1i9~Q~_~Slg~~_Q~Q~iQ~Q-in~El
~1 Qff=~i~~~i__Q~~~i~9__i~_E~Q~ia~Q_in_SQ~Qli~nS~_~iEn_~~EQi~~iQn
~-_2f_ini~_S2Q~_Qf_Q~gin~ns~~_~nQ_i~_f~1~_~~~!SS~a_~i!Q_Ei!~-
minQ~~__QC_SQns~~!~_m~!g~i~l~~_~!~iQ~Q~_snQ_lignigQ_in-SQ~Qli-
snS~-~iEQ_~~EQi~i~iQn_Jlh1_Qf_!Qi~_2~Qinsns~~
E1 e~~~ing__s~~~~--s~~_f~n~~Q_Q~_~s~~~n~Q_f~~@_!n~_~i~~_Qf_n~igQ-
Q~~ing_~~~i~~n!isl_Y~~~-QC_~n_~E~E!i~9_~8~_Qi~!~iS!_i~-S~~Qli-
snS~_~i!Q-~~EQi~i~i2n_~1~1_Qf_tni~_Q~Qin~~~~~
4>
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - December 8, 1992
, Page 4
)
(Discussion - ATV/Snowmobile Ordinance, Continued)
"
Mr. Barber - wanted no more rights than the snowmobilers. He suggested
they talk to the dealerships in the geographic area about riding in
Andover. They would like to ride in the northern portion of Andover to
access Oak Grove or Sherburne County, to places where they can ride.
Mrs. Richner - stated they have to trailer their ATV two blocks to be
able to ride because it is illegal to ride in Andover.
Commissioner Peek did not support relaxing the ordinance for ATV's but
did support being more restrictive on snowmobiles, especially in the
southern portion of the City. Commissioner Jonak felt it is inevitable
that snowmobiles wil1 have more restrictions. He felt ATV's tear up the
ground in this kind of weather. With the possibility of further
restrictions on snowmobiles, he couldn't see.being less restrictive on
ATV's. Chairperson Dehn understood the desire to ride ATV's, but also
saw the damage caused in boulevards, yards that go to the road, etc. She-
also sympathized with the noise issue raised by Mr. Sullivan.
Residents present stated they did not initiate the discussion to place
more restrictions on snowmobilers. There is talk of more restrictions
and the damage they cause, but nothing is being done. They just want a
few privileges that snowmobilers have and have a legal riding area in
the City.
MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Pease, that the Planning and
Commission recommends no change regarding ATV's in the
ATV/Snowmobile Ordinancei however, it strongly recommends
greater restrictions on snowmobile usage within the City.
carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Apel, Jovanovich, McMullen) vote.
Zoning
current
creating
Motion
OTHER BUSINESS
@ Towing Service/Impound Lot in Industrial Area - Mr. Carlberg explained
the Council has asked the Planning Commission to consider allowing the
operation of a towing service in the Industrial Area. Lund's Towing
Service has been operating at Eddie's Auto Body, Bunker Lake Boulevard,
for a year. The use is not permitted under the ordinance, and Council
thinking in the past has been to not allow any more automobile related
uses in the City.. Others who have inquired about opening a towing
company have been told no.
Robert Lund, 1329 Quinn - stated he has been towing for the Sheriff's
Department in Andover for accidents. Cars are only there until the
insurance company adjusts them, and then they go to other body shops.
The number of cars at anyone time is not more than 2S. He does not buy
or sell junk. He also provides 24-hour service for starting cars in
Andover. He has been operating as a business for a year. Since the
area is fenced and closely related to the other uses in the area, he
thought it was permitted.
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - December 8, 1992
Page S
,
,
(Other Business, Continued)
"
The Commission noted it is not a permitted use at this time.
Commissioner Jonak felt this use could be allowed in the Industrial area
by Special Use so the size and some other things can be controlled. As
long as the size is controlled, he did not have a problem with the
number of towing/impound lots in the Industrial area. They would look
better than the auto body shops if guidelines are established. There
could be no selling of parts. Commissioner Peek felt the City should
have control over how long the cars will be in the yard.
Mr. Lund _ stated 90 percent are dealt with by insurance companies.
They are responsible for the car. If he picks up snowbirds on the
highway, he sells them to a junkyard if they are not claimed within 30
days.
Mr. Carlberg was asked to research what controls other cities have on
towing and impound lots and to schedule a public hearing on the issue
for the first meeting in January, 1993.
Commissioner Terms - Mr. Carlberg stated the terms of Commissioners
Peek, Jovanovich, and Pease expire on December 31. If they wish to be
reappointed, he asked that they make their request in writing. The
Commission recommended Mr. Carlberg check with the Council as to whether
they wish to reappoint existing Commissioners or to advertise for and
interview other applicants.
There being no further business, Chairperson Dehn declared the meeting
adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
~~C;;-~~
Recording Secretary
/
\
)
?:~'--~~::;:::::--;'_..".,
.; ~\
i .
. .
'.. .L :'
, -.,
. '
-', ,
, J
........ ,:./
CITY of ANDOVER
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 1, 1992
MINUTES
The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to
order by Mayor Ken Orttel on December 1, 1992, 7:30 p.m., at the Andover
City Hall, l68S Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota.
Councilmembers present:
Councilmember absent:
Also present:
McKelvey, Perry, Smith
Jacobson
City Attorney, William G. Hawkins
TKDA Engineer, John Davidson
Public Works Supervisor, Frank Stone
City Planner, Dave Carlberg
City Finance Director, Daryl Sulander
City Administrator, James Schrantz
Others
RESIDENT FORUM
Robert Lund, 13929 Ouinn - asked to get a license to operate an impound
lot at Eddie's Auto Body at 1786 Bunker Lake Boulevard. It would
involve the towing and storage of vehicles. Mr. Carlberg explained the
ordinance has no provision for the towing and storing of cars. Mayor
Orttel noted towing is a natural part of the automotive recycling
businesses in that vicinity. Attorney Hawkins agreed the existing
businesses tow vehicles, which is incidental to their business; but
there is nothing in the ordinance that would be close that this could be
considered incidental.
Mr. Lund _ stated there is no addition. There is a 10-foot fence
shielding it from Bunker Lake Boulevard. No cars will be stored in
front. with the growth of Andover, there is a need for this service.
North Star Towing now has a virtual monopoly on this use. He stated he
has been towing for a year, not realizing there was a problem with iti
so he has established himself in the area. He has bid for Coon Rapids,
but cannot take the contract without a place to store the vehicles. Mr.
Lund stated he has had a lot of compliments from people and has many
letters from residents that have complimented him on his service. He
has towed for the Sheriff's Department, the State patrol, residents,
etc. He estimated a maximum of 2S cars would be impounded at one time,
but there is a fast turn over. Most are there no longer than a week, and
they are sold to North Metro in East Bethel if they are unclaimed after
30 days. He asked for a temporary permit until something is resolved.
Councilmember McKelvey stated he goes by that vicinity many times a day
and never realized the towing business was there. Mayor Orttel agreed
there is.a problem with the competitive towing business in this area.
He didn't think a temporary permit could be given, but recommended the
/ Planning Commission look at allowing this type of use with a Special Use
Permit. No action would be taken against Mr. Lund until the Council
acts on a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Council agreed
to add the item to the Agenda.
(.'./~~" .."'":"7"',.,\....)
, .L '
\: ./
"1>,....", >.;/
;v,~~";;.:;.,,..
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW, . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, January 26, 1993 at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to discuss and
possibly amend Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03, Permitted Uses.
Said amendment would allow towing services/impound lots by the
granting of a Special Use Permit in the I, Industrial District.
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
/
u~u
V~ctor~a Volk, c~ty
Clerk
Publication dates:
January l5, 1993
January 22, 1993
I
\
)
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Discussion Item
ITEM Approve Survey
NO'l),consultant/92-27
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
February 16, 1993
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
APPROVED~
AGENe bD
BY: /
j
~
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the surveyor that will
prepare the right-of-way plat for Commercial Boulevard, Project
92-27.
The City Engineer will be receiving proposals on Tuesday,
February 16, 1993. A recommendation by staff will be made at the
meeting.
MOTION BY
, TO
J
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
,
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE
February 16, 1993
~6M Order Condemnation/
'0,pheasant Glen
~
APPROVED FOR
AGE~~
BY: / tp
J
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to order the condemnation of PIN
34-32-24-43-0001 (Hurst property) for sanitary sewer and
watermain construction.
Due to time constraints and not having the ability to having
prior easements executed and the plat has not been reviewed and
approved by the City, we recommend the condemnation be ordered.
In addition, we are concerned that the preliminary plat of
Pheasant Glen may not be approved by the City because of an
agreement between the developer and the property owner on the
garage location.
The condemnation starts the time, so if we can not negotiate the
easement acquisition the project will not be held up waiting for
the 120 days that the City Attorney needs to get access to the
property.
The easements are needed to complete the sanitary sewer and
watermain for Commercial Boulevard and Echo Ridge/Jay street
projects.
Also see Item 13 from the February 2, 1993 meeting for additional
information regarding the Hurst's garage.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
,..........1.
. ,.
"1
I
; j
)
~
~
~~.
/
.il
"'
.I
..l
I
Un.. -->> ~~~.;~=~ ll~;~_~~~~z~_~_.~.
=.:;af?~Q~~~:Z- ~~~~- -=I:;--D--~~ T! 1
~ -I' ': I '! -]~ I _ '!
. I:" ~u_. \ hI" r"l= I Lh_J,
~h_h"""'U , , I L._
:, . :'f?\ \ \ '\": Nt~.'~~'~_
. . II~ NL-L\-:\ - ~ ~ "J i 1----.
.-- -,I L___h~ __ ~ ' . "..... ..,____.._'_,'--,
!L~~.-_::ii,::~7 ~_, ~ " '"
I' "r , , ., , ,'. .:,,~"
I~ ni 'r;;;' /.1' II " \ ..' ~(~_"<"''''.
I : /' t! "WI' I __ "".... "-
' L" ,,~ ' ,'. d ,:;--.. , " \
~..r-Q:-'~ ; ~( 1-" ~s~::=R1 r '>\~\. ~
II 1 d',' '_'h='.,~. ,L.___u_" \,
_h ---..J , ! I:; Fl ! N.! ,
' -j=f'=l ; J ! ['! bl-Lh==",
~:L-~~ I Grfl -Jl-"=c,,_
'I 'Q I:;,! ! : d ___J ~ r~'-- .
'" I~ ~: .. ! I I Lh=......--fi ~, ~
~ ,,~:~- ! -1 i /, I:; CJ :""'1 * L.~____
~ '" 'I',(~r: I :!! ~ZU-:f<_
J: ;oj I' '"' ., ~ I ' I -, ::.........-1 I '"
~ ~.,r-E::~";I': r .~trlll '~: .,~
...t:i--ro I h 'I II:; , ." m L "'>_.10
z "', _-.1" ~ 'N. -3 _
' "/r"i'"J'" i i. _J rc"="'u'
g II I.. .!, :-.----.;r-'---., r ~ 0
~:r "'L:"\ ! i ! ! I:; D'-L'IL :.~ l~L
l.!... h ---~ I " 8 , .'i?~.lL
11---=-'<' I, I;; ---.l LU_:&"F- 9
g' .I! Q ;',: ! f-o['r-i-./'.. r.. ~ ~ '"
~ 'I m, d, I : I:; ! '"" 'n (fJ
- II L,,~,,-, i I' ! I " t...:,,~_
fj----- ., ., , '. -..J 1-- u-:r:
" ,.~;; i I ~'---:~--l-' I Q
I e: ~', i : CJ l~j : N
IfL;._:.j i fi ,,~n 1=",_
r!F:" I:; I I ~. -'..-- ~ I :
I' 1l I) ~ .' , '~ I I : _ I
,,:1'1\ ~I' I ~ :"'1 L
r · _~, ...-J 'I h_
i
j
-/
,
...."..:-
. ~~
"
"
AA~.'~~~
.~;};.
"~
f)
#
\ \. .&.4'
. ;' ,.'::.:~~~<;;v
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
February 16, 1993
BY:
Todd J. Haas
ITEM City Hall Park Complex
NO'-1. #2 Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
~
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Discussion Item
The City Council is requested to discuss City Hall Park Complex
#2 and options that have been submitted to the City by the North
Metro Soccer Association of a indoor soccer complex and by the
Andover Athletic Association of a indoor batting cage center for
baseball and softball.
Attached is information provided by both associations.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
'. TO
SECOND BY
"
;:
, -
l}jl
i.
(!'
,.It
W
. ,Iii
, ~
~,
,1tI
,:Ii
~-t=
i
..,
.-
..~",
I
/ J
I
-(
\
J
=
~
ot=
~
i <.
110
@,o
COt) 0 ,
.~ g'l,!
@R) g I
@,g
= 0
~~
,~i-
6(5
r;;::'J
~@)~
~~ ;
~~ :
iJ,l
~i '
r;;::'J~-:"J!
~ '
_ l
~ !
6:
I
~;t
,
J
"
J
. ~ 114
tllle""
~8.: lll.
....~~
~z~~ ~
s~z.~
~",iiJ l5."', ...
.s's
~D~
'~~". .
lli~l!lf .
ih~i
w~Hll
l5 c; '. 9
ug'l.
~....8
~h~
j. ~
fj.~..
~}j 0
.~H
~U~.
to.~
, c~.!;; ~~
~~~~
~~~H p~~
.~h. ~~l'
~~~H~ ~ni
clllal.g~~
H ~..~:~ ..
o~n~~@ !~~~i
i~iB! g~ii'~
L~~~il. i5~ 0
iu~e.~ I"~ \I'
"ljH~.. h~2~
Hi~U . HU
!~~UH ~h"
S~zRm~~ l"(iR."
alii e ..Si~ . -ll,l/i
~!3~!~~c g~j-o
~C-==Bll"~f:(' e~~.9
c~ J,e:: ~ ~ o~o.U
U~~!-~~ H~O:
><Jj! f~ Dl~~
:> 10.. ' J! U ell
j~16~ 0 i~<G~
U~",i"'OCl;; ~",,9~
~q'~
gl>.
..H~
~~H
"'~h
5 0 'j
OJN
~5.t
l?-@'i .
~.!i
H~~
I
II '1111
~t
. ...
Ii Ii
lH"~
~ .~~~~~
"' '~~ E~ .
g;~o .~!
"~il"U
l!I u c-i <II
!1i ~ ~~"'i~
-J ~.i!:S l:",g
filP~~[li~
t- CI 13 n .'0" ~
5 E U ~~ ~ u
CO w..e~B;; ~
f"'l:?oVIPEP &Y
!/terlf /AEr,ea
, >ou,G,c...
i~ j:i.~I~a~~K i~~~~g i!~~
~u oi;'lij-5o.] ~c:lB ul~o~!'6 31llj
n ~H~:~)!!~ ~HHI n;~
~ti'I tlE~ ~!3sIs'" c.U fill:' eiijC
. ~ ~"'~~~;ow~g ~'~~H' .~:;E
€ i€.!~E5i:g~~~ ';~~i-i~ ~~~~
.g~ =z:OiatJi1Ii~a.go EC~R-OC~ moot:
tD ~:;r~H...."BI" ~!lI;;O: ~I"~"
~ "hS~~~o o'j ..0-2< .ll~~
u~ 5.~8<~' H~ :~ .~~~ ;~5~
!~! Hdnh!H ~~~Hil ~gi:~
!~!~ r~~i~i~~
I:H!i~ :51: ~ .~.~OI
~j~'go a:6:a1g",l!!~
.~;; ~~~~~H'
~~ii,.. .Et:~i~o~l
ille.o =:!l!!E!!ii:",~
t)~;~ ; ~~g~ ~ ~~
.. ~ . ~ '" ~
Ei'eie . ~ :?~gli:g'",:i .
SEc.a: .cOI..a:iltl ~
i ! I: 5 i ~I: g5 ~i 1l ~
g'..~D :'f~;gOEJ::<1IE
.l;iaiJ~ a:iJ!!E~.mali5o
>- au
c c. 02
.~ J~~
E g ~ ~ t!
~~~ ~; I
~a.~ : ~ae
., l~ti ~~&
~tll f.l~ ,:,~lll
cl~~~ j si~
~.cJ!... ~~;;
~ 'Q-ll~~e .
E~~~~l ~!
]IIE"?ltIi-~
~~~~it:~~iil
~s~~g!o~~
'~"~.igg:;r!\
010 c. 01 .m ~ CC
~~~~~ !'~;;~
~~ .~o ,g.
osl?'lJ~ili 5~-g
5~i~g~~h;
~-~ll~~~~w~
:~~~~jEjKB
ia!1'.:e~~
.<~~.l'll~
;&: g !.!ii< y
~~"J~~o~ .
~ll9~".pll
h. ~.9,g~
5~!~IO:::Ii:...~
H8H~~iz
~~~~~~i~g
~ [' .Oouu
oli "ii~g~j!
H -0.. 0
~2. !~~E 8
~~
H
~~
_i.
~g~
hl
, ~ 0
15~!1
~~i
.. ,,~
~E"
g~~
1~~~ g15.~V
<~~I:'B~~~
~~q8iriiii
~.~ r. ~~~ ~~
... i:> 2'~'W.3
8' ~::J.~"'~::I
n;;~i~"~li~
!! ';;;; ~::I"';- '" ~ l?
Kh",! F~~
!7~~: ~.~j
li~KEOhi;
c(~ "'~ 8."i1i: ft~
-0:
"'Ul
~~
EOZ
~~~
..as<
it~g :
- ~~ffi
s~:~CJ
c..g~
w.c_..J
I-
~Ill$' ";1<;- '~i<!!<'<
Ela l'" ~o ~d~~.
~~Q~H~i )=..H~jj~
Q : _ ~~. O.~ s: ~15J!!
~~ilgB.~~ ~~~;iin
h fOhh ~~IQllR~B~
~~~ ;i.EEft ~i5~2'~~~i'D
~.,i gs "" ~ ";:.-Sa~3~.~g
~"~g~g~i", .aii,(,lIll~rg
~~~EGl~~~~ s~,~~~g~15i
s~~~~e~~g D~g"2[ja.ijQ~
u ~.t:: ~::. ~ I- i5.J!! ~ ~ -= ~ I- ..t" g ~ ::I
:: lfoa~~~~~~
~ ~1';;"5h,\!l'
C -0 Of! ::Il:LllI CIlia
_ <liMe e. J! III "2
.!ill i"~'-~S.ii~.
ii:.. : s:~..~il2 .g~
",.~~~1l~!~~1i.
~';!~li~i~ag&~
. !!::! ~$~Z~"'~';~
0:;:0 g.. !: po '" kl ~ s
:5..i~~&?iQt.13~~
~55 ~Z~~~~ ~l Ii.
HIli
:.~~"2
,,~o9 r'~
~o: i~!
'" oU
'55 a"
~o f
~~~~
::..c€
w~F.2 ~
~~~~i
:~~~J!!
8 ~
h I
~ ~ !~ 1
i t ~ Jt r
! I Hi ~s
tjQI p II
iHi~ .iloi
!H~ ls~ Is
!
n
;~ .
'i~g
~~B
md
.D.
"ii2~
~jl
h~
1-.c2
'55n~~
.o~ i Ii"
}~~E~~
U ~g.2i
~~~'TiI
~h ~ ~t
~~ ~QE!l
...lI>'
. - ~~ K
iill~i
u..~;o;: ::>1- >0
\
/
,
;I
"
;I
.
t
~
270'-00'
i
CLUIl HOUall!
SEI! PlAN
!Ii
,
IM]O[Q)WIE~lf' ~rQliE;iE;1E1Rl iE;rQllM] ~1L1a\
"".U..,_ /
)
f'~ovIPEP /1)1
A0.eTH M~T;/!d
.$Ot'C~,e.
/
~
<t
"
J
~
-O!
~
'\
)
"
J
11'-11'
RETRIL saus
-
-
,
..
N
J:
..
..
M-
z_
it:
u
..
~
,
-
-
,
~
......., ,--
'\ /'"
-I
~ .-1
':;1
~
....
...
.. ........
....."...
.......
........
....
.....
......
w
u
it
..
....
.....
..
...
,.........
.. .,.......
w
u
;::
..
..
.~
IHflJ'IllIm~1I:IE
i w
IE
- -
I ~
.
i !!
. ..
!
Ii
34'-00'
t.i
Z
~
o
~;-......
...
...
CD
CI
...
C1~
Z'"
:z:~
u;r
1::::19
Zy
IC~
~...
ICy
...y
1:19
IC"'"
...[:>
......
~E
U =
=;r
I!:
...
a:
IC
f'J2tJVIPE-P ,By
,).//HZTIf I'1E;;;eo
5J1??t;lZ.-
;>~cSF'</TEP py
TIfE AIIp~vG.z
fJihle+"~ ,d!S~a f,CN
DONATION OPTION
RECEIVED
FEB 09 1993
CITY OF A(\jI.JOVER
ANDOVER'S FIELD OF DREAMS
/
· AREA CONTRACTOR WILL DONATE $2SK TO PARK COMPLEX,
PROVIDED THE CONTRACTOR:
· CAN ALSO CONSTRUCT AND DONATE ANOTHER 60' X 120'
BLOCK BUILDING ($150K) ON COMPLEX, THEN
IN RETURN:
· LEASE BACK THE DONATED BUILDING FROM CITY FOR A
10 OR 15 YEAR PERIOD ($l/YR), AND BE ALLOWED TO:
· OPERATE AN INDOOR BATTING CAGE CENTER FOR BASEBALL
AND SOFTBALL.
· AFTER 10/15 YEAR AGREEMENT, THE CITY CAN OPT TO
CHANGE THE USE, REISSUE THE LEASE AT A NEW RATE,
OR SIGN WITH NEW PARTY.
· IN ADDITION, IF CONSTRUCTION SAVINGS CAN BE ARRANGED
THROUGH DONATED MATERIALS, ETC., AN EQUIVALENT AMOUNT
OF DOLLARS SAVED WILL BE ADDED TO THE $2SK.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
.
Identical arrangement in process at another metro
location.
, /
· All city approvals/agreements in place for that site.
· Andover park board agrees with conceptual proposal
(2/4/93)
· Members of Volunteer Task Force support the proposal.
· Provides vital funding resources, plus an opportunity to
increase that amount through donated materials.
· Sufficient user basei but no guarantees required during
the lease; contractor also responsible for insurance.
· Similar to AAA Building arrangementi City Celebration
ventures, and civic organizations in community.
ACTIONS NEEDED
· COUNCIL SUPPORT OF THE CONCEPTUAL PROPOSAL
· ALLOW THE PARK BOARD AND TASK FORCE TO INTEGRATE
IDEA INTO PARK COMPLEX PLANS
, ,
.
ESTABLISH AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY AND CONTRACTOR
COMPARABLE TO OTHER LOCATION.
/
$fr~..
.~
;
;~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
February 16, 1993
DATE
ITEM Approve Signal/Crosstow1
NO'R. & Bunker Lk. Blvds./93-
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
#
Todd J. Haas
BY:
APPROVED t. R
AGE~V
CA'
r!'.
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Discussion Item
.
The City Council is requested to reconsider the motion of January
19, 1993 regarding the traffic signal located at the intersection
of Bunker Lake Boulevard and Crosstown Boulevard and reconsider
making it a permanent signal.
Jon Olson of Anoka County Highway Department has told us the
intersection does meet warrants and is wanting to reconstruct the
intersection with necessary turn lanes to allow for the
intersection to function properly.
See Item 12 from the January 19, 1993 City Council meeting for
backup material.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
SECOND BY
,
ITO
CJ3-!
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - January 19, 1993
Page 7
\
/
(Non-Discussion Items, Continued)
~ 11. Approve Water Resource Management Plan
16. Approve Kennel License Renewal/Hobnail Dalmatians
17. Declare City Hall Smoke Free
18. Boundary Commission (appoint Ken Orttel as resident
representative and Larry Dalien as Council representative)
Appoint Election Judges (See Resolution ROlS-93)
Approve Summary of Garbage Hauler Ordinance
Receive December Financial Statements as amended, noting the
change that the Council received this evening
22. Amend 1993 General Water and Sewer Fund Budgets (See
Resolution ROI6-93)
Accept Kob's 1st Addition Streets (See Resolution ROI7-93)
Accept Easement/Lot 1, Block 5, Meadows of Round Lake
Approve Speed Limit/University Avenue north of County Road
60 (See Resolution ROl8-93)
/26. Approve Revised Grading pian/Pheasant Meadows (See
Resolution ROl9-93) .
'27. Approve Plans and Specs/IP92-20/Woodland Creek 3rd (See
Resolution R020-93)
/28. Accept Petition/Echo Ridge/IP92-29 (See Resolution R02l-93)
/30. Approve Final Payment/IP91-l0/IS9th Lane, Swallow, Quinn
(See Resolution R022-93)
/ 32. Release Escrow/Holmberg Addition
19.
20.
21.
/23.
/24.
/ 2S.
Motion carried unanimously.
~
APPROVE SIGNAL/CROSSTOWN AND- BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARDS h)")
'--
The Council questioned the. need fqr a signal at this intersection,
feeling there are other areas in the City that are more of a problem.
Also, since the county plans to upgrade Bunker Lake Boulevard within the
next few years, if a signal is to be placed there, it should be a
temporary one. Council asked for some justification for a signal at
that intersection as opposed to other intersections such as 143rd and
Round Lake Boulevard and l47th and Seventh Avenue. Also, it was
suggested if a temporary signal is accepted, the City should start
budgeting for the permanent one.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Perry, Council approve the installation
of temporary signalization at the intersection of Bunker Lake Boulevard
and Crosstown Boulevard on the condition that the county provide the
City with justification that it does meet warrants. Motion carried
unanimously.
APPROVE BIDS/RECYCLING PICK UP
;
Cindy DeRuyter, Recycling Coordinator, reviewed the bids for removing
recyclables from the Recycling Building. The cost of the low bid will
actually result in less cost to the City than the current pickup with
Staff help. There are sufficient funds to do this.
,
. ~fo
CITY OF ANDOVER
,
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
February 16, 1993
/
BY:
ITEM 1993 CDBG Projects
NO, q, & Budget
REQUEST
ORIGINATLNG DEPARTMENT
-Plannlng ~
David L. carlberg~
city planner
AGENDA ~TW~ting - Public
NO, .
Hean.ng
The Andover City Council is asked to review the following 1993
CDBG Projects and Budget including:
1. Continuation of the Andover Comprehensive Plan.
2. Grants to Public Service Agencies - the process would be
similar to the 1992 process.
3. Continuation of Neighborhood Revitalization Projects.
1993 BUDGET
The City has received the official word from JoAnn wright,
Community Development Manager of the Anoka County Community
Development Block Grant indicating the amount the City will
receive for conducting the 1993 projects listed above. The City
should receive $50,618 for 1993. There will be a deduction of
$1,000 for administration costs by the County. The total below
indicates this deduction. The City is requesting the following
amounts to be allocated towards the 1993 projects.
Comprehensive Plan
Public Service Pool
Neighborhood Revitalization
Contingency
$15,000
25,000
5,000
4,618
Total $49,618
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
\
)
,
/
,
J
Page Two
1992 CDBG projects & Budget
HRA Meeting
February 16, 1993
Attached for Council review and approval are the preliminary
project request forms for each project and a resolution.
The Council may wish to change the projects or the amounts
allocated to each project. Upon approval by the County, Staff
will inform the Council on the amounts allocated for each project.
,
J
,
J
,
)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -93
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1993 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT BUDGET TO BE USED TO CONDUCT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF
ANDOVER FOR THE BETTERMENT OF ANDOVER RESIDENTS
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the need to use
Community Development Block Grant funds for the betterment of
Andover residents; and
WHEREAS, the County of Anoka makes said funds available to
the City through the Department of Housing and Urban Development
following guidelines established for the use of Community
Development Block Grant funds; and
WHEREAS, the City will receive funds distributed by Anoka
County to conduct projects for the residents of the City for the
1992 fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing notice was published in the
Anoka Union indicating a translation service would be provided as
deemed necessary; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no
opposition to the proposed 1993 projects and Budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby approves the 1993 Community
Development Block Grant Projects and Budget.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 16th day
of February, 1993.
CITY OF ANDOVER
J. E. McKelvey, Mayor
ATTEST
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
PROJECT il
/
PRELIMINARY PROJECT REQUEST
Anoka County Community Development Block Grant - 1993
I. PROJECT NAME
Andover Comprehensive Planning
II. PROJECT ACTIVITY
/
The proposed project is the continuation of the 1989
CDBG Program and will update and improve long range
planning efforts within the City. The current Andover
Comprehensive plan was completed in 1980 and approved
in 1982. It addresses few if any housing, (low and
moderate income) issues. Because of the rapid growth
experienced by Andover, the Comprehensive Plan should
address public services and facilities. Administrative
costs will be included in this project.
All residents of the City of Andover will benefit from
the update and improvement of the City's Comprehensive
Plan. As the City continues to grow, residents will be
better served if the City has long range goals and
plans with which to guide development.
III. &
IV. PROJECT DURATION
The Comprehensive Plan was projected to take three
years to update, including plan preparation, public
input, City approval, Metropolitan Council approval and
publication. However, with recent difficulties
encountered receiving Met Council approval the project
will need to be continued. The City Comprehensive plan
will guide development and City improvement for the
next five to seven years and if implemented properly,
into the next century.
v. This project would address the problems of housing,
sewer and water capacity planning, parks and
recreation, public facility development, commercial
development and other development and growth issues.
VI. The Andover City Council proposes to use $15,000 in
1993 for the continuation of the task of updating the
Comprehensive Plan. Total dollars spent will depend
upon the resources needed to resolve the issues imposed
upon the City by Met Council.
,
J
Page 2
Andover CDBG Proposal
February 16, 1993
,
J
VII. 1992 Planning Costs
$ 15,000
VIII. Because this project will be a City-wide effort, it is
impossible to determine at this time the number of
households that will be served by this project.
However, it is expected that the project will impact
the community as a whole.
IX. Andover believes that planning long range growth is
vital to the proper use of resources within the City,
including finances and land. As the City continues to
improve long range planning efforts within the City,
all residents will benefit from a better living
environment.
X. David L. Carlberg, City Planner is the project contact
person.
XII. David L. Carlberg, City Planner, Daryl Sulander,
Finance Director and William G. Hawkins, City Attorney
are the individuals authorized to request
reimbursements for project expenses.
XIII. PROJECT SCHEDULE
/
January 1993
Metropolitan Council
Review & Recommendation
February - March 1993
City Council Review
March 1993 to July 1994
Transportation Study?
)
PROJECT #2
j
PRELIMINARY PROJECT REQUEST
Anoka County Community Development Block Grant - 1993
I. PROJECT NAME
Andover Public Service Assistance Program
II. PROJECT ACTIVITY
The proposed project will continue as it did in 1992 to
assist several local public service programs that serve
low and moderate income families or individuals. The
City will designate a portion of the CDBG funds for
programs that meet CDBG criteria. An application
procedure, approved by Anoka County, will be used to
determine which programs receive funding. The
application will be similar to the one used in 1992.
All public service programs must serve low and moderate
income individuals. Administrative costs will be
included in this project.
J
III. &
IV. PROJECT DURATION
This will be an on-going project. The Andover City
Council believes that programs that serve low to
moderate income families/individuals should receive
some level of funding from the CDBG funds annually.
V. This project would address the problems of services for
senior citizens, handicapped individuals and services
for the homeless.
VI. The Andover City Council proposes to use at least
$25,000 in 1993 for public service programming. Total
dollars spent will depend upon the number and amount of
the requests received by the City.
J
Page 2
Andover CDBG Proposal
February 16, 1993
, J
VII. Advertising for proposals
$
50
Amount of Public Service Funds Requested
$25,000
VIII. Because this project will be a City-wide effort, it is
difficult to determine at this time the exact number of
households that will be incorporated into this project.
The actual figures will be determined once awards have
been made and reports from subrecipients have been
received. It is expected, as in past years, that a
number of Andover and area households being affected.
IX. Andover believes that its financial involvement in
public service program funding is vital to the growth
of services required for a growing community. Andover
recognizes the need for programs that serve both local
and regional clientele and this effort is part of the
overall effort to fund public service programs
throughout the Twin Cities metropolitan area.
X. David L. carlberg, City planner is the project contact
person.
XII. David L. Carlberg, City Planner, Daryl Sulander,
Finance Director and William G. Hawkins, City Attorney
are the individuals authorized to request
reimbursements for project expenses.
XIII. PROJECT SCHEDULE
June 15, 1993
Receive Applications,
City Council Review
Funds Awarded to
Public Service
Programs
April 1, 1993 - May 7, 1993
PROJECT *3
PRELIMINARY PROJECT REQUEST
Anoka County Community Development Block Grant - 1993
I. PROJECT NAME
Andover Neighborhood Revitalization
II. PROJECT ACTIVITY
,
The proposed project is an on-going continuation of the
City's effort to clean up blighted properties. rhe
project will include the identification of blighced
properties, the acquisition of the properties, possibly
the demolition/removal of blighted and/or substandard
structures and the resale of the property for new, more
energy efficient single family homes or commercill
properties. Administrative costs will be included in
this project.
The total number of persons receiving benefit fr~m
this project is unknown at this time. These fig'Jres
will be determined by the number of blighted pro?erties
identified and cleaned. Neighbors living in close
proximity to the proposed acquisition sites will
benefit from the removal of substandard and blig~ted
structures and from the clean up of the surrounding
neighborhood.
III. &
IV. PROJECT DURATION
This is an on-going project in the City of Andov~r.
The identification, acquisition and demolition/r~moval
will continue through the duration of the project. The
City will evaluate the project in the near futur~ to
determine the program's effectiveness and if the
program will continue.
V. This project would address the problems of neigh~orhood
blight, substandard housing and energy efficient
housing.
VI. The funding for the Andover revitalization proje:t
will come from the project income from the sale )f lots
acquired in the past. The City is also requesti~g
$5,000 be allocated toward the project for the 1~93
fiscal year.
Page 2
Andover CDBG Proposal
February 16, 1993
\
)
VII. The cost of acquisition of the property and/or
demolition of the blighted structures will be
determined with the appraised value of the properties
and agreed purchase prices.
VIII. Because this project will be a City-wide effort, it is
impossible to determine at this time the number )f
households that will be served by this project.
IX. The acquisition of property and or demolition of
blighted structures is anticipated to be a long
term project for the City of Andover. The City
recognizes the need to remove substandard and bllghted
structures from the City's housing pool and in
addition, to improve the quality of housing within the
City.
X. David L. Carlberg, City Planner is the project c0ntact
person.
,
XII. David L. Carlberg, City Planner, Daryl Sulander,
Finance Director and William G. Hawkins, City Attorney
are the individuals authorized to request
reimbursements for project expenses.
/
XIII. PROJECT SCHEDULE
May 1, 1993 - July 1, 1993
Identification an1
inventory of blig~ted
properties or
substandard structures.
July 1, 1993 - June 30, 1994
Property acquisition,
structure demolition and
removal, property
resale.
\
)
'I~f"~, -
/ ....~
; \
i ~
)\UJ
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
DATE ~wbrY.ry
19, 1991
ORIGINATING DEPARTMEN~
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee,
ITEM
NO, 10, Planning Consultant
Com . Plan Contract
REQUEST
J
The Andover City Council is requested by the Consultant, Robert
Wuornos of Urbanalysis to reimburse him fifty percent (SO%) of the
remaining contract for the Andover Comprehensive Plan. The City
Council on October 15, 1991 made the motion to hold the remaining
$1,980.07 of the contract until the Comprehensive Plan is
completed (completed being final product after Metropolitan
Council approval).
It is common business practice to hold five (5%) percent of the
total contract amount to assure the project will be completed.
Note: Mr. Wuornos was last paid for his contractual services in
August of 1991.
,
MOTION BY
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
jTO
\
}
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE F",hr""rl' 1~. 19!il3
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
staff, Committee, Commi
Finance
~JMII Membership Funding
, . Northern Metro Mayor's
Daryl E. Suland
Finance Director
REQUEST
The City Council is requested to discuss the membership and
subsequent funding for the City of Andover to join the Northern
Metro Mayor's Association.
Funding possibilities:
1) Use the extra allocation of $3,306 for Local Government Aid
received from the Local Government Trust Fund on Dec. 26, 1992.
2) Allocate a portion of the 1993 Budget from contingency. The
current balance available here is $11,670.
3) Place a surcharge on development fees.
Current Preliminary Plat Fee is $50.00 plus $7.50/acre.
Current Final Plat fee is $20.00.
To place the surcharge in perspective, the 1993 budget
for plat fee revenue is $1,000.00, therefore to raise
an additional $3,000.00 the current fees would need to
quadruple.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
\ TO
)
SECOND BY
/fA')
\ \~~ ~1'\\d
; " /v
/ '-'~, . ,.,......-"'",-,~.,.<>'~
-~,........,....,
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
February l6, 1993
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Staff, Committee, Comm.
ITEM Schedule Meeting/Rd. Lk.
NO~. & Bunker Lk. Blvds.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering ~~
,.f-
BY: Todd J. Haas
This is an informational item for the City Council regarding the
reconstruction of Round Lake Boulevard (91-22) and Bunker Lake
Boulevard (91-28).
A Special City Council meeting has been scheduled for March 11,
1993 at 7:30 PM with Anoka County Highway Department. The County
will make a presentation of the plan along with the City's
approximate share of the construction cost.
Also included is a memo and drawing from Dale Gelling and Dale
Strassburg for consideration. A copy of this has been sent to
the Anoka County Highway Department for their review.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
RECEIVED
q/-~B
;
FEB 09 1993
CITY OF ANDOVER
MEMO
From: Dale Gelling
3432 136th Ln. NW
Andover, -MN 55304
Phone: 421-9632 (H)
Dale Strassburg
3422 136th Ln. NW
Andover, MN 55304
Phone: 427-2071 (H)
481-2566 (W)
To: Anoka Co. Highway Dept.
Jack McKelvey, Mayor
Marjorie Perry, Council
Don Jacobsen, Council
Mike Knight, Council
Larry Dalien, Council
cc: Grace Luth. Church
Date: February 7, 1993
Subject: Street Option
136th Ln.@ Bunker
Attached is an alternative proposal to the current drawing
for a through street at 136th Lane and Bunker Lake Boulevard.
We believe it is a good option because it should satisfy the
concerns of all parties living in the area. More
specifically, it provides the following:
, I
1. The church is provided an entrance from eastbound Bunker
into their parking lot. There also is accesibility to the
De,wnte,wy, Cey,ter from exit iy.g the church' lot.
2. The medical building tenants have a quick and easy
entrance and exit to the Bunker intersection. They also
pick up a few extra parking stalls in the existing
driveway which would be closed off.
3. The residents in Chapman's addition are protected from
the unsafe conditions generated by excess traffic in the
neighborhood. If a natural berm is constructed along 136th
Lane, it would further protect the neighborhood from
excess noise and lights from traffic. This would be a
natural extension of the berm by Grace Lutheran and Big
Wheel Auto store.
We would appreciate your prompt consideration of this option.
We feel it benefits all concerned parties. If you would like
to discuss it in person, please call. Our phone numbers are
listed abc.ve.
8i y.cerely,
"
J
dw~
Dale Gelling
Chapman's Addition
/U
,
)
_. _ C> ~_"")
_m; ~
-ct)
Q:f
iJ
_0
..
~
~
V\
~ :~
?>'9
,
~.... 'r.,
. y \,-
. ~~
" L -
--::"1 -<;-7,.-
\f)
.
~
~ ..J-.
deb.-
0.--
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
'\:5
~
.u
,~
O'YL
~~
:t
I !.
,
~
-
~~
....
c:f
~~
III
~~E
"~
..
-~ ~
~~ ~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Non-Discussion Item
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
February 16, 1993
Admin.
APP,R~O~~~OR
AGEN ~
BY:
../
ITEM Award Bid/Well it2/
NO,. 93-3
\,3.
BY: Jim Schrantz
The City Council is requested to consider the bids for
maintenance of Well it2, Project 93-3, that will be presented at
the meeting. This is a public utility budgeted project.
The bid opening is scheduled for 10:00 a.m., February 16, 1993.
We are anxious to start this project so the maintenance work can
be completed before the high water use demands in May. The
completion date is May 1, 1993.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
..~. -- --- -----.
;{~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
February 16, 1993
ITEM Approve Change in Spec
NO'I~, Requi rements/Urban Area
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
#
BY:
Todd J. Haas
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Non-Discussion Item
The City Council is requested to approve the change in policy
regarding construction testing which in the past has been part of
the contract with the contractor but now the City will pay for
those tests and charge them back to the project. The resulting
cost to the project should be the same.
The City, under this
the following areas:
bacteria testing.
change of policy, will do testing in some of
compaction, gradation, bituminous and
Attached is a memo dated January 20, 1993 from TKDA addressing
the problem resulting from the current specifications.
The City Engineer has received this request and/or changes and
recommends approval.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
SECOND BY
,
,
; TO
t
Q,0>
I
/
.-1-- ji"J I)
10/
, TKDA
/
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
1500 MERlTOR TOWER
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUl., MINNESOTA 55101.:!1'"
PHONE:e12f2g2...uoo FAX:8121202.o083
January 20,1993
Mr. Jim Schrantz
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, Minnesota 55304
RECEIVED
JAN 22 1993
CITY OF ANDOVER
Re: Revision to Construction Testing Policy
City of Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 9140-002
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
As discussed, the current policy regarding construction testing being paid by the contractor is
causing some problems.
"
Currently, it is the Contractor's responsibility to select a testing company, schedule on-site tests,
coordinate distribution of reports, and pay for the testing services, The motivation to hire the
cheapest testing company and take the least amount of tests is always present. Some of the
problems resulting from this policy we have encountered are as follows:
1.
Late or improperly scheduled tests.
2.
Incorrect results on reports.
3.
Incorrect testinl! urocedures.
~ .
4,
Distribution of reports and results being late.
5,
No consistency in reporting procedures due to numerous testing companies working in
Andover.
G.
General lack of control interacting with numerous testing companies.
\
, )
\
)
'\
j
Mr. Jim Schrantz
January 20, 1993
Page Two
We feel that it would be a benefit to the City of Andover to revise the current policy to have the
City select and pay for construction testing as a project cost. This cost would not be an
additional engineering cost because it is currently being paid as part of the construction bid
prices. We suggest it be identified separately as a construction testing item.
If you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely yours,
~tJ-4fk-
Thomas A. Syfko, P.E.
TAS:j
cc: John Davidson
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
February 16, 1993
~JMAccept Petition/93-5/
H:LWinslow Hills 3rd
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering~
BY: Todd J. Haas
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
Non-Discussion Item
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring
adequacy of petition and ordering preparation of a feasibility
report for the improvement of sanitary sewer, watermain, streets
and storm drains, Project 93-5, in the Winslow Hills 3rd Addition
area.
Note: The feasibility report will not be prepared until the
developer provides all the information that is required in
ordinances and the City's Water Resource Management Plan
that was recently approved.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
,
/
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STREETS AND STORM DRAINS
PROJECT NO. 93-5 ,IN THE WINSLOW HILLS 3RD ADDITION
AREA.
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition, dated
January 25, 1993 , requesting the construction of
improvements; and
WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to represent the
signatures of 100% of the affected property owners requesting such
improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover that:
1. The petition is hereby declared to be 100% of owners of
property affected, thereby making the petition unanimous.
2. Escrow amount for feasibility report is $1,000.00
\
)
3. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to TKDA
and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a
feasibility report.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
regular
Meeting this
16th day of
February
1993 ,with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victor~a Volk - City Clerk
\
/
.~
-I
lfl-5
Winslow Hills Properties
\ 9016 Collins Drive N.W. · ADoka, Minnesota 55303
J Gary M. Gorham: 421-0998 Winslow Holasek: 434-5812
January 25, 1993
James E. Schrantz
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
RECEIVED
JAN 27 1993
CITY OF ANDOVER
REI PROPOSED WINSLOW HILLS 3RD ADDITION
Dear Mr. Schrantzl
Winslow Hills Properties does hereby petition for improvements by the
construction of water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and streets
with concrete curb and gutter with the costs of the improvements to be
assessed against the benefiting property which is described aSI
WINSLOW HILLS 3RD ADDITION
Said petition is unanimous and the public hearing may be waived.
We request that a feasibility report be prepared as soon as possible.
J We have enclosed a check for $1,000.00 for the feasibility report
expenses.
(THE $1,000 WILL BE CREDITED TOWARD 15% IMPROVEMENT ESCROW.)
Sincerely, ~ rw ~I-o..;w-J
Winslow Hills Properties Partnership
3538 Mississippi Dr. NW
Coon Rapids, MN 55304
Gary M. Gorham - President
Gorham Builders, Inc. - Partner
Winslow I. Holasek - President
Holasek Properties, Inc. - Partner
"
,
/
@\'"
''':~
) !}))
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
February 16, 1993
DATE
BY: Todd J. Haas
APP:~!lVRD FOR
AGE.y...A",\
I,D
"I U
BY: I
V
ITEM Accept Feasibility
NOI~~ Report/93-6/Bunker & Rd.
lY 'T\' t:I 1 ~.-'l u. .
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
~
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Non-Discussion Item
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
feasibility study, waiving public hearing, ordering improvement
and directing preparation of plans and specifications for the
improvement of Project 93-6 for watermain in the following areas:
1) Approximately 300 feet east of Round Lake Boulevard on Bunker
Lake Boulevard.
2) Along the west side of Round Lake Boulevard between Bunker
Lake Boulevard and 139th Avenue NW.
3) Along the east side of Round Lake Boulevard between 134th
Lane NW and 136th Lane NW.
) The feasibility report is in your side pocket of this packet.
Note: By approving the resolution the city will not assess the
adjacent properties until such time a petition is received
or the City requires the watermain to be assessed to
benefitting properties.
The project is to be paid for by utilizing trunk watermain funds.
If the City Council wants to consider assessing the watermain
along the west side of Round Lake Boulevard north of Bunker Lake
Boulevard a public hearing will be necessary and will need to be
initiated by City Council action.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
, TO
/
SECOND BY
----------------- --- ------- ------~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
j
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING,
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT 93-6 FOR
WATERMAIN IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS
1) APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET EAST OF ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD ON BUNKER LAKE
BOULEVARD 2) ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD BETWEEN
BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD AND 139TH AVENUE NW 3) ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF
ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD BETWEEN 134TH LANE W~ AND l36TH LANE NW
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 2nd day of February,
19 93 , order the preparation of a feasibility study for the
improvements; and
WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by TKDA and
presented to the Council on the 16th day of February ,l9~; and
WHEREAS, the City Council waives the right to a Public Hearing;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and
declares the improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of
$ 79,500.00
"
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the
Andover to hereby receive the feasibility
total cost of improvements of $ 79,500.00
Hearing and order improvements.
City Council of the City of
report with an estimated
, waive the Public
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City
firm of TKDA to prepare the plans
improvement project.
Council to hereby direct the
and specifications for such
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
Meeting this 16th day of February,
City Council at a
regular
19-21, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
\ Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
~
/
RES. NO.
MOTION by Coun~ilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 93-3 FOR MAINTENANCE OF WELL AND
PUMP *2 CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF THE CITY WATER
SYSTEM
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids, bids were received,
opened and tabulated according to law with results as follows:
Bergerson-Caswell, Inc.
E.H. Renner & Sons, Inc.
Traut Wells
$10,890.00
$11,375.00
$11,618.00
,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate
Bergerson-Caswell, Inc. as being the apparent low bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into a contract with Bergerson-Caswell, Inc. in the amount
of $10,890.00 for construction of the improvements; and
direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the deposits made
with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder
and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until the contract has
been executed and bond requirements met.
)
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
meeting this l6th day of
City Council at a
regular
February
, 19~, with Councilmen
voting in favor of
the resolution, and Councilmen
voting
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/
BID TABULATION
WELL #2
PROJECT 93-3
Bergerson- E.H. Renner
Caswell, Inc. Traut Wells & Sons Layne Minn
l,475 1,750 1,400 1,500
800 1,250 500 600
20/60/4 5,780 5,540 6,860 7,760
B.C.
10/50/4 4,230 3,890 4,960 5,4l0
Traut
20/50/l0 5,600 5,400 6,550 7,450
EHR
2,835 3,078 2,615 2,805.50
----- ----- ----- --------
20/60/4 lO,890 ll,618 11,375 12,665.50
B.C.
lO/50/4 9,340 9,968 9,475 10,3l5.50
Traut
20/50/10 10,710 11,478 11,065 12,355.50
EHR
Estimated Units:
.= Surge / Material Removal / Test Pumping
Hrs. C.Y. Hrs.
Item 3 $95/Hr. $115/Hr. $120/Hr. $165/Hr.
Item 4 $60/C.Y. $50/C.Y. $70/C.Y. $70/C.Y.
Item 5 $70/Hr. $60/Hr. $65/Hr. $65/Hr.
i
@\
~"
. .,~.\.....
,.~
':{
jj
',,;- \\. ,..fll
/' ',,,,:,:"%7/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Fl'!hrll:'lry 1 h
1qq':l
Non-Discussion
Finance
::,~
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
~5M Reduce Cash Escrow
, \1.Northglen 2nd Addn.
BY:
Daryl E. Sulande~~O~
Finance Director ~
REQUEST
The City Council is requested to authorize the reduction of
the cash escrow held as a special assessment guarantee for the
Northglen 2nd Addition.
BACKGROUND
Cash deposits totaling $126,608.00 were received from Good value
Homes on May 27, 1983 establishing an escrow account for the
Northglen 2nd Addition.
Subsequent refunds of $114,729.37 and credit of $6,304.37 for
interest earnings have reduced the balance to $l8,183.00.
The current escrow requirement for unpaid special assessments is
$13,822.08, therefore, $4,360.00 should be released to Good Value
Homes.
SUMMARY:
Original escrow balance:
$126,608.00
Less: Refunds
6,304.37
114,729.37
Add: Interest credit
Current Balance:
18,183.00
Less current requirement:
13,823.00
Requested Refund:
$ 4,360.00
-----------
-----------
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
; TO
SECOND BY
MEtllNG _cX!-jt -1 3
I..GENDA !Tnl" :L
Cordell R Moe
37S IS7th Ave NW
Andover, Mn SS304
February lS,1993
Dear Andover Council Members
On January 26, 1993 a hearing was held at the Andover City Hall
requesting the sub-division of Omar Dizayee property bordering the
lS9th street cul-de-sac on the west with Goldenrod cul-de-sac to
the north east, and my property to the south.
What an owner does with his property is generally between the owner
and the city planners. However, in this situation what is or isn't
permitted will affect the property owners along the lS9 corridor
from Ilex to University.
Ten years ago I was allowed to situate my passive solar home facing
to the north with the promised easement with Goldenrod in the near
future. As events went on this did not develop for several
reasons, one of which was the expense of traversing the wetland
areas to the south of Goldenrod.
The alternative to the Goldenrod access is the IS9th street cul-
de-sac to the east of Ilex. This cul-de-sac lies just 60 feet north
of my property line, because One Hundred and Fifty Ninth does not
follow the lot lines at this point.
At present I understand that Mr Dizayee is selling his property
and the new owner is planning to build. This would not normally
present a problem except the location. of the recent perk test
suggest the building site of the new home lies directly in the
projected path of the extending IS9th. At present there are no
plans of extending IS9th that I am aware of, however, if the IS9th
extension is blocked by building a home at that site, the future
sub-division of my ten acres and the sub-division of the properties
to the east of me will be eliminated.
It is the =ight of a property owner to build a home, however, ~his
should not be out of harmony with the future needs of neighboring
land owners. This real estate holds ~he key to ~he ga~e of our
future neighborhood. The building site of any dwelling should take
into consideration the needs of our neighborhood.
Sincerely,
f ~I/?' /L ~<'
Cordell R Moe
DATE: February 16, 1993
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Tree Commission Minutes - January 25, 1993
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - January 26, 1993
City Council Minutes - February 2, 1993
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes - February 4, 1993
Letter from John Davidson, TKDA - February 3, 1993
Letter from Cynthia Vogt
January Building Department Report
Ord. No. 42B
Coon Creek Watershed District Information
Feasibility Report/Bunker & Round Lk. Blvd. watermain/93-6
Schedule of Bills
What's Happening
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT
AGENDA.
THANK YOU.
, *********************************
*********************::::::::::::::*******************************~*
*.*********** **
:~ **
~ "'"'
~~ **
~~ **
~~ "'"'
~~ _WHAT'S~AEPENING ?3OJ ~~
~~ February 16, 1993 *"'
~~ "'*
~~ *"'
~~ WDE Si te **
~~ "'*
~~ The executed agreement has been mailed back to "'*
~~ the PRP Group. "'*
"'~ **
~~ **
:: I have mailed by certified mail the attached ::
:: letter and map to Tony Emmerich of Hills, Inc. ::
"'~ concerning the area that within 500 feet of the **
:: landfill has institutional controls applied to ::
~~ it per the l06 order of the U.S. EPA and the **
~~ "'*
~~ access agreement. There are at least 5 houses *"'
:: existing in the Hills of Bunker Lake 4th ::
~~ Addi tion in the 500 foot area. *"'
~~ **
"'~ *"'
~~ N The contractor for the WDE site is just about **
-tcof( .*
"'~ finished installing the forces main for the well *"'
~~ water pumping. **
"'~ *"'
~~ "'*
:: N Bids are being taken for the cap and wall along ::
~~ Hanson Boulevard. It is going to be a large *"'
:: project. 2 feet of clay will be hauled in from ::
:: wherever, not anywhere in Anoka County, plus the ::
~~ cover materials. "'"'
~~ *"'
~'" *"'
"'", They need large quanti ties of water for dust **
:: control and to get the moisture content right ::
~~ for the spreading and compaction of the clay. **
~'" "'"'
"'~ **
:: I have the plans in my office if the Council is ::
~~ interested in reviewing them. .*
~~ "'*
"'~ .*
~~ **
"'~ **
"'~ .*
~~ *"'
~ *
.~: :*
"'~ **
"'~ **
"'~ **
~~ "'*
~~ "'.
~~ .*
"'", ."'
"'~ ..
~~ .*"
"'", .*
"'~ .*
~~ **
~~ **
"'", *.
~~ .*
"'~ *.
~~ .*
~~ .*
~~ ' ************************ ,..
~~******************************~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
'. . 'f.
,r~"~'=~.\
I~ i
~\{y
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW, . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
February 12, 1993
Tony Emmerich, Vice President
Hills, Inc.
2619 Coon Rapids Blvd. NW
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
Re: WDE Landfill
Dear Tony:
The U.S. EPA along with the PRP's for the WDE landfill are
proceeding with the final closure of the WDE site.
The U.S. EPA has issued a 106 order (July 26, 1991) which
outlines restrictions on the property that they call the
facility. Along with the restrictions on the site the U.S. EPA
has placed restrictions on the properties within 500 feet of the
toe of the landfill. Thes. properties include 10 lots in the
Hills of Bunker Lake 4th Addition along 140th Lane NW.
These restrictions were presented to you in a letter (dated March
4, 1991, Certified Mail P 911 813 451) with attachments from the
MPCA.
I also called you December 12, 1991 at 2:50 PM to remind you of
the above mentioned letter and attachments.
Recently the City of Andover entered into an agreement with the
PRP's for the WDE landfill where the city agrees to enforce the
restrictions in the area within 500 feet of the toe of the
landfill.
I have enclosed a map showing a line that represents the 500 foot
distance line.
The restrictions are' called Institutional Controls in the
agreement. These controls are to protect the improvements on
the property from the infiltration of landfill gas that can
cause a potential explosion and/or fire hazard.
The EPA requires that if houses are built on the restricted area
they must be protected from the possible infiltration of the
landfill gas.
?
I'
I have received from the MPCA and EPA various reports discussing
how a house can be protected from radon gas that the agencies
believe will also protect the house from landfill gas
infiltration.
If we at the City can be of any help in solving the situation,
please contact Dave Almgren or myself. I have the names and
phones numbers of the people that may provide additional help in
the design of the protection of houses from landfill gas.
CITY OF ANDOVER
::~2
ames E. SChra~tz ~
City Administrator/City Engineer
JES:rja
Encl.
Certified: P 911 813 317
cc: Bill Hawkins, City Attorney
.-:, ,..
v
(4 ) A prohibition,
approval of U.S.
" groundwater :/:'or
the purpose of
maintaining the
(5) A requirement that any building constructed
within 500 feet (line F, Figure A) of the
limit of refuse (line D, Figure A), excluding
any land lying north of Coon creek, be
constructed so as to protect occupants from
infiltration of landfill gas.
.'
CITY OF ANDOVER ACCESS AGREEMENT
-8-
~~ ! r--: ;-
.~. J
i I . .
!
,
~. . j' IL - ~ ~ - !
I ' ; I , I
..--~.~ i i !
I I i""'l---
I ,r --....'
.
x
,,-- . ---". A r \
~- ---i %'1
~--- <">~
'CP
. .-.....
......... .
1-"
..--..---
: I'bt1t :
'. ."..
'I
r
I
I
,
1
,
, ..J
~
TKDA
cc...- o-l(o~3
TOLTZ. KINO. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
1600 t.lERITOR TOWER
0144 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101-2140
PHONE:612f.2n-4400 FAX:612f.292-0063
February 3,1993
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Andover, Minnesota
Re: Regular Council Meeting
February 2, 1993
Anuover, Minnesota
Commission No. 9140-993
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
1be following is a summary of engineering matters discussed and action taken at the regular
meeting of the City Council held February 2, 1993,
L City Project 92-24 - Andover Boulevard Street and Utility Project, Public Hearing
Comm. No. 10312
Mr Davidson made a presentation of the Feasibility Report dated December 10, 1992,
Home owners east of the in-place trunk: sanitary sewer had not been advised of the petition
as submitted. The petition was signed by owners of 31 % of the frontage. The project
would require a 4/5 majority vote of the Council to proceed,
Council Action:
The Council authorized the Engineer to proceed with preparation of final design plans,
The plans should be presented for approval at the March 2,1993 Council meeting.
The Council continued the hearing to March 2,1993.
The Engineer is directed to work: with the City Finance Director to detennine adequacy of
funds for this project.
2. Comprehensive Plan Approval
The Metro-Conncil has directed the City join with other North Metro Area communities
and affect an updated thoroughfare plan with emphasis on the T,H. 110 corridor.
TIle City of Andover would be granted 100 acres of expanded MUSA boundary in return
for withdrawal of its present updated plan until the T,H. 10 plan is completed.
/
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FeblUlliY 3, 1993
Page 2
"
Council Action:
The Council directed City staff to contact the Cities of Coon Rapids, Blaine, Ramsey and
Ham Lake to cooperate in a tnmsportation plan update, They are to request agenda time at
the respective next City Council meetings,
In the interim, the City of Andover will withhold acceptance of the Metro Council
proposal.
3, City Project 92-29 - Feasibility Report - Echo Ridge Addition - Utilities and Streets
Comm. No. 10348
The Council received the Feasibility Report dated January 29,1993; accepted waiver of
hearings and authorized preparation of final plans and specifications,
4. City Project 92.27 - Feasibility Reports Commercial Boulevard Comm. No. 10340
and
City Project 92-16 - Pheasant Glen - Comm. No. 10198
The City Council at the suggestion of staff, set a public meeting work session for 7:30
P.M" Wednesday, FeblUary 10, 1993, to review the Feasibility Reports in detail.
The condemnation of easements and right-of-way will be reviewed in detail as well.
5. City Project 92-13 - Pumphouse No.4 - Comlll. No. 10212
The Council approved the final plans and specifications and set the date for opening bids at
10:00 AM., Friday, February 26, 1993,
6, City Project 93-6 . Feasibility Report, Round Lake Boulevard and Bunker Lake
Boulevard Trunk Watermain Extensions
The Council authorized the Engineer to prepare a Feasibility Report for the above
referenced project.
7. Consent Agenda:
The Council approved agenda items as follows:
27, Citv Proiect 92-17 - Meadows of Round Lake. Commission No, 10066-05 - Street
and Stom} Sewer
The Council approved Change Order No, 2 and fmal payment to Hennen
Construction in the amount of $41,091.19,
28. City Proiect 91-27 - Meadows of Round Lake. Commission No, 10066-02 -
Sanitarv Sewer and Watennain
The Council approved Change Order No.3 and fmal payment to Hennen
Construction in the amount of $56,346.24.
Honorable Mayor and City Council
February 3, 1993
Page 3
r
29. City Proiect 92-2 - Weybrid~e 2nd Addition, Commission No. 10102 - Street and
Utilities
The Council approved fmal payment to Weidema Construction Company in the
amount of $23,980.51.
TIle Engineers were excused at approximately 11:30 P,M,
Sincerely,
~~
John L Davidson, P.E.
JLD/mha
~ CC,
2/10/15
/Qn6--/ ~ ~ -i2. ~.- --<-~L
~ ~ /
\J/ ~_L--'" ~.7: . 7 ~ ~
~~. ;1. -7.. <<- ~----0
~X'~~L7~~ ~.~
--..-J~' ..J~~
~~.(~~
L~~~ ;~.~. '" .J
~ ~.) /J /J
V~~~.-c---F~
~CL.- . ~
. '-"<----"' ~ ' _ J It
~~- ~
~o- r'
4
RECEIVED
I
, FEB 0 4 1993
CITY OF Ai,mOVER
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW, . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
MEMORANDUM
\'
Mayor & City Council
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
Departments
David Almgren
February 3, 1993
JANUARY 1993 MONTHLY BUILDING REPORT
I hereby submit the following report of the Building Department for
the Month of January 1993:
BUILDING PERMITS
16 Residential (15 Sewer/l Septic)
2 Chimney/Stove/Fireplace
-! structural Changes
19
APPROXIMATE VALUATION
$ 1,533,000.00
3,800.00
5,000.00
$ 1,541,800.00
PERMITS
19 Building Permits
25 Heating Permits
14 Hook Up (sewer)
21 Plumbing
73 Pumping
1 Septic
14 Water Meter
16 Certificates of Occupancy
53 Contractor's License
15 License Verification
13 Health Authority Form
14 Sewer Administration Fee
14 SAC Retainage Fee
1 Reinspection Fee
FEES
$
Total Building Department Income--January 1993
Total Valuation--January 1993
Total Number of Houses YTD (1993) - 16
Total Number of Houses YTD (1992) - 23
$
$
COLLECTED
10,270.90
755.00
350.00
2,191.00
182.50
35.00
700.00
64.00
1,325.00
75.00
65.00
210.00
105.00
30.00
16,358.40
16,358.40
16,358.40
DA/jp
~u.
YJ~
i \
FE3-04-1993
1 .
?
-.
15:22
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
i
I
CALL TO ORDER
Approval of Agenda
Open Mikel
!
FROM COO~I CREEK WATERSHED D I ST
TO ANDOVER
P.01
AGENDA
18 cc'
:-j - f0 ~q3
../
COON CREEl< WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF HANAGERS
"
February 8, 1993
7:30 PM
POLICY ITEMS i !'nit fax; J sS -0 is
4. Approval bf Minutes _---------
5. Receive HbnthlY Financial statement:---
6. Approve 5Hlls
7. Re~uest f'rcm JMM for Permission to Bid on NPOES Work in the
o i ,,~ ... C ~I
-Y" i
PERMIi ITEMS I
I
S. Renew Peterson Slack Dirt Mining Permit # 507
9. Hid~en C~eek 3rd Add. Utilities (PAN 93-02)
I
i
I
DISCUSSION HEMS
I
10. Receive Staff Report
Post.ltN brand tax transmittal memo 7671
"":Ji rn Se tz. rl'Oflt!;, m ~cfl
co. -Af) fJOV6R..- eo. CC W b
PIlOn<! t
Otrpl.
3.
i
i
,
I
INFORHATIONA~ ITEHS
I
11. Hinnesot~ Sustainable Growth Initiative
12. ACQ Wet13nd Educational Hodel
13. Update o~ SWSR and Wetland Rules
I
NEW BUSINEssl
ADJOURN
. FE3-04-1S93 15:23
FROM COON CREEK WATERSHED DIST
TO ANDOVER
CooH CREEK WATeRS~eO OISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS' MEETINO
January 25. 1993
The Board 0' Mana~trs of ene Coon creeK Watershed Oist~lCt nel~
tnelr re;ular mett,ng on January 25. 1993 at the 8unke~ HIlls
Activlt,e. Ceneer.
i
pre..nt:j Req9'. Hemmes. eleon Hentges. LuEllen Richmond. Paul
Willlamsl Bo~ soyum.
I "
St.f': Tim Kelly. Karen potttr, Hlchelle Ulrich.
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:37 PH
I .
2. Aoproyal of the Aqenda: Kelly aSked to add an update from the
'WQ~kShOPI on January 21. 1993. Hoved oy Richmond to aPProve the
agenda. seconded ~y w,lllams. Hotion carried with fIve yeas
(Soyum, HemmeS. Hentges, RIchmond, and williams) and no nays.
I
3. OQen MIke: No one for open mike.
I
Policy tUms
4. APprdval of January 11. 1993 Hinutes: Hoved by Richmond
approve lthe mInutes. seconded ~y WillIams. Hotion carrIed
five yeas (80yum, He~.es. HentgeS. R1Chmon~, and WIllIams)
nays. I
Permit Itell\S
I
5. MajeStIC Oaks North 2nd Add: Kelly presented the permIt
reVIew. i A portion 0' thIS plat waS prevIously Oefore the Soard
on J~neI24. 1991 as ~~rt of "3J6S~IC OakS North as a concept
pl~n. A~ that ~Ime, ,t ~a$ ~IVQn approval. ~ot si~es fan~e from
I acre eo 3.5 acres. The F!S ShOWS thl$ area to have a flood
elevstl~n of apprO~lmately aso. ~c~ever, the overf10w for 143rd
is elev~elon 885.3 and for 141st ~ane, IS 890.0. BUIlding
elevatIons ~etween 14Jrd and 141$t Lane should be 888 ~nd above.
FOr south 0' 141st Lane. a9~ and. a~ove. ThIS should be made
clearerlon the gradIng plan that these are the minImum bUilding
elevatIons. There are no OHR wetlandS affected by thIS prOJect.
Hemmes QuestIoned whether a one foot elevat,on dIfference eetween
ehe 1001 y.ar elevstion ana ehe bu,ld,ng pad was accuraee.
Hentgosl.responded that when you see tl'le ter~a'n in the arell. ; t
should not ~e II pro~lem and a one foot elevatIon is okay. Byron
Westlund stated there IS a culvert at each road, and there IS a
lot of capacIty for draInage. A new culvert was installed on the
Sueklui oroc.rty. Hoved Oy Hentges to reCOlMlllnd aoproval o.ndlng
rec.'o~ 0' .roslon control .scrow o( $3,511.00 and olan 'how,ng
m'n'mu~ eUlld,ng cad .levstlon according to the .tlltament under
flnd'n~.. Secone.a ~y w,ll'a~.. Hotlon carrIed ~'th ('v. y.a.
(Boyum.! H.,....,es. Hentges, RlCM,ond, and wIlllll"'a) and no nays.
I
CI.cu..lon Item.
i
&. Ace :Reouest for ~;nanclal Support (or a Grant to Oev.loo a
Wetland EducatIon ~odel: '-.lly stat.d that th. ACO II loo~ln9
for contrlCutor.. The Quest,on eo tne Board IS whether the
O,.tf,ct I. Inter..t.d In contr'cutlnq. ~,'11aml asked what kind
Qf , ~d.l ~hll would ce. ~elly re'oon~ed that It II .
CleMIg\a.. model w'tn 12 cartr,dg.. tnat can Oe In.erted to
IImute'e dl'ferent I.nd u.... wetland type. and w.tland ah'O.'.
Rlcnmond ...ed wn.t the aIle 0' ~ne model would be and would I~
~e tr.o,oeftacle. (elly not.d ~nat It I. .tlll In the plannln9
at'ge, ICut tne ~del wOuld proOaO!y ~e In a tran.port'bl, c....
H.~' fe.oonded th.t ne wovld Ilk. to .e. . cl.n 0' the .odel.
to
...,tl'l
and no
P.02
FEB-04-1993 15:23 FROM COON CREEK WATERSHED DIST TO ANDOVER
I
I
Boyum SU1~ested C~rls ~ord Irom ~CO come to t~e ne~t Board
meetIng ~~d 9've a presentatIon for the Soard. The Soard
agreed. ~.lly wIll contact ChrIS ~ord and set UP a tIme for the
presentat Ion.
7, pptentlal e?~ Grant for Wetland Management Plan: ~elly noted
thAt tnl,r Item was dl,cussed brIefly at the last Board meetIng.
~elly noted that he nad t~l~ed wlt~ Bruce Sandstrom of SWSR, and
receIved ~ne informatIon on t~e gr3nt. The Crant would have two
goals: 1.\ Wetlsnd M~nagement Plan: Tne wetl~nd plan would be
coordInated wlt~, and become a portIon of. the DistrIct's
COmorehenSlve Plan. T~e plan would be developed In cooperation
wltn the BwSR and coordInated wIth the CAC, TAC, COE. ONR and Het
Councll.l:L Federal 404 PermIt Oehqatlon: A l>econdary goal
would be ~o Implement t~e plan In a manner that would allow the
COE to ls~ue a general or regIonal permIt tnat would certIfy the
Olstrlct ~etland permIttIng program as complIant wjt~ lederal 404
and 401 ~ermlt/certl'lcatlon reqUIrementS. Hemmes stated he
lIked tn~ wetland Management olan's Ide3. Hemmes stated further
that Whljle there IS value In wetlandS. we need to qet the
informAtl,Qn across as to wllat 15 ~ractlcal for Ano}o,;! COunty.
Hent;e, asked what tile ellances were Of tile COE delegatIng
autIlQ~lt~ to the Olst~lct. roelly res~onded that It 1$ unknown,
It would Ice a Federal deCISIon. and at thIS pOInt ,t Should be
VIewed as navlng a ~o/~O Chance. RIChmond a~~ed how tne DIstrIct
could flrtQ out more detaIls. r.elly responded tnat the DIstrIct
can Sl1cw!tlle,r ,nterest an: tee what haocens. Boyum stated that
If tile D1strlct has re;ulatory control. tnls IS a goOd ,de3. if
not, the:DIstrlct should not get In~olved. Hentges and RIchmond
agree':!. :
a. Introduce Drsft PolICY: Wetland Ju~Isdlctlon DelineatIons:
Kelly noted we have had eases wllere areas were uncer or over
delIneate':!. TillS draft qlVe tMe DIstrIct a gulce for what 15
nee~ed fer wJDs. Tne speclllcs and standards are rIght out of
the 19$9IManual. Boyu~ as~ed If everytnln~ In tile draft w~s
recutreel (or all dellnoatlons. ',e111 re!:oonaed It 1$ can of the
permIt revIew. DelIneatIon revIews are part of ~he cac~a;e.
Hent;es noted there could De a lot of latItude In the tIme of
year wnen WJOS are done. tMe 5011 and water taCles can vary, It
csn De very tl~e conSV~lng arc e~cens,ve. ~el1y resoonded ~hst
tnese re~ulatlons are involvec ard tlley snould Ce, Hemmes agreed
tllat ~hel Wetland Jur1Sdlctlon OellneatlQn Draft 1$ a cractlcal
appll=~t~on. r.elly aaCed t~St tnls drsft oolloy would be a tIme
savIng tool for tne Qlstrlct, Nu~cer e o( the draft oollcy
ststes t~e ex,lratlon d~te$ f~r WJOS, thIs InformatIon w~s
Qetalne~ from feedoac~ snd tr.e twO yeer exolratlon date 1$
relsons=le. WillIams es~ea _r.St the WJD ~raft oolrey would
accc"'ollisl1. ~el1y resoon:led tllat It wIll tell prIvate
~.'lnea~~r$ wl1st the Olstrlct exoacts. ~oved oy Boyum to accIPt
tile crs~t p~1 ley, seeonaed ~y ~Ic~mond, Motton csrrled with fIve
ylaS (Sorum. Hammes. Hen~;e$. Al~lImond. and WIllIams) and no
I
naY$. I
9. UC~ite en CeRE: The CO~I$sion on A.'or~ and Ef'ICI,ncy met
Jenusryjl2 to r.vlew tne c~ollc co~nts and vote on ltl final
r.co~e~d3tlOns. January I~ wSS tll. dat of tn~ snow s~orm.
Accordl~g to ClIff A1Chlnq.r, 1.1' tnln hllf of tn. Commlsslon.r.
..'. O'.s.nt. Cllff also Indlcatld tnlt tne Commlsslon.rs tnat
w.~. ertSlnt vot.o to .CPCP' Int r.l.r.ne. or dllCUlllon of lQcsl
.nv'~cn~.ntal s~.nc..s. Tnl CCPi w.ll no. pUblISh tnelr final
r.oo~t/~.c~.ndst'ons. He~.S not.d thst tne Olltrlct wIll
cont'n~1 to monItor tne CC~lsslon on r.lorm ~nd Efflcllncy.
I
10. VO~.tl on ~I.tln? wltn Rlc. Cr..~: At tn. January II BOlrd
~.tln1\ t~1 Soa'd IndlCltld & d",r, to m..t .,tn tn. SOlrd of
tn. AI'I Cr..~ ..tlrlnl~ Dlltrlet If . ~.snlngful .~.nd. COuld b.
i
I
I
P.03
FE3-04-1993 15:24
FROM COON CREEK WATERSHED DIST
TO ANDOVER
developed. W~"Iama has been in contact with aerry Sande to
dlac~Ss t~e ide.. Rice creek will be m.eting January 27th and
t~ey wIll 1get back to wllllama.
I .
II. Update on PublIC workshOO held January 21, 1993: ~.lly
stated t~at fIve people came to the workanop. Rich~nd alao
attended. \ lhe Olstrict received 4 phone calla r.lat;ng to thia
project. Rlc~~nd noted that one ger'On at the workshop was
concerned with t~. no;ae. Overall everyone was very supportive
of the project.
\
HEw' BUSINESS
Meeting a~joUrned at 9:02 PH, Hoved bY RiChmond, secOnded by
willIams. ~otion carrIed with five .yeas (SOyum. Hemme., HentgeS,
RIchmond, and WillIams) and no nays.
RegInald A. Hemmes, President
P.04
J
]
~
J
ROUND LAKE BOULEV ARD-
BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD
WATERMAIN EXTENSIONS
CITY PROJECT 93-6
~
J
J
..,
,
cJ
~
J
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
J
I
LJ
~
J
..,
J
J
COMM. NO.1 0369
..,
J
J
J
J
TKDA
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
1500 MERITOR TOWER
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-2140
PHONE:6121292-4400 FAX:6121292-0083
~'\
J
..
. J
""
. J
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS-ARCHiTECTS-PLANNERS
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
FEBRUARY 10,1993
--"
_ J
--"
" J
--"
.j
FEASIBILITY REPORT
..
FOR
.!
-"
ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD. BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD
_ J
WATERMAIN EXTENSIONS
- 1
. J
CITY PROJECT 93-6
..
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
" J
..
COMMISSION NO.1 0369
_J
..
. [
-,
--.J
-,
--.J
I hereby certify that this Feasibility Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I
am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota,
-,
ThO~~
Registration No, 15266
--.J
.....,
..J
-,
..J
.....,
..J
..,
10369
..J
. ,
,1
.~
. J
ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD - BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD
WATERMAIN EXTENSIONS
CITY PROJECT 93-6
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
-,
_ J
-...,
- )
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- ,
_ J
-,
_ J
Project Location
-,
Introduction
_ J
- ,
Initiation
_ J
Improvements
-,
.j
Feasibility
-,
_ J
Right -of -way/Easeme nts
.,
Permits
.J
.,
Financing
- 1
Estimated Project Cost
-,
..J
Future Assessments
--,
Proposed Project Schedule
_J
.,
Preliminary Cost Estimate
-1
Future Preliminary Assessment Roll
-,
..J
Improvement Drawing
--,
....J
--,
....J
-,
_1
Pages
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
4
5
6
7
10369
"
_ J
"
_ J
ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD - BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD
WATERMAIN EXTENSIONS
CITY PROJECT 93-6
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
-,
- j
-,
. J
Project Location
-,
The proposed project includes three (3) separate watermain extensions near the
intersection of Round Lake Boulevard (CSAH 9) and Bunker Lake Boulevard (CSAH
16).
.J
-l
.J
The three areas are as follows:
..,
1.
The west side of Round Lake Boulevard from Bunker Lake Boulevard to 139th
Avenue NW.
. J
.,
2.
The East side of Round Lake Boulevard from the existing watermain north of
134th Avenue NW to 136th Lane NW along the west side of Chapman's
Addition.
.J
-,
.J
3,
A crossing of Bunker Lake Boulevard about 400 feet east of Round Lake
Boulevard.
-,
~ J
Introduction
--,
Anoka County is proposing roadway improvements on Round Lake Boulevard (CSAH
9) and Bunker Lake Boulevard (CSAH 16) this construction season. Watermain
improvements constructed in conjunction with the Anoka County improvements would
eliminate restoration and jackings for utilities crossing the County roadways.
. J
--,
.J
--,
Initiation
.1
This feasibility report was initiated by Andover City Council action.
-,
- j
Improvements
--,
The proposed improvements would be in three separation locations as mentioned
previously (see Improvements Map).
_ J
-,
1,
Round Lake Boulevard (North of Bunker Lake Boulevard)
.1
--,
-1
An 8" watermain would be extended north from the existing watermain near
Bunker Lake Boulevard (CSAH 16) to the existing watermain on 139th Avenue
NW.
--,
. J
--,
-1-
10369
. J
--,
_ J
-~
_J
All lots that do not have water presently would be serviced by 1-inch copper
services with curb stops located at the property line.
Fire hydrants would be installed to provide adequate fire protection.
Note: This 8" watermain extension is required because Anoka County will not
allow 1-inch services to cross Round Lake Boulevard from the existing
watermain on the east side of the road.
-,
_ J
--,
_ J
-,
_J
2.
Round Lake Boulevard (West Side of Chapman's Addition)
-,
An 8" watermain would be extended north from the existing 6" watermain north of
134th Avenue NW to 136th Avenue NW. 8" watermains would be stubbed on
135th Avenue NW, 135th Lane NW and 136th Avenue NW for future connection
to Chapman's Addition.
3. Bunker Lake Boulevard Crossing (East of Round Lake Boulevard)
_J
....,
_ J
-,
A crossing would be constructed to loop the existing watermains north and south
on Bunker Lake Boulevard.
....,
....,
Restoration costs have not been included in this report. It is assumed that Anoka
County would be responsible for restoration as part of their roadway
construction.
_J
. J
-,
Feasibility
The project is feasible.
_ J
-,
_ J
Rig ht-of-way/Easements
-,
It is proposed to use existing right-of-way for the watermain construction.
. J
....,
Permits
_J
--,
Permits will be required from the Minnesota Department of Health for watermain
extensions and approval from Anoka County will be required as all of the work will be
within County right-of-way.
_ J
....,
_ J
....,
--1
-,
_ J
-,
-2-
10369
.J
-,
_J
-.,
_J
Financing
-,
It is proposed to finance the project with City of Andover Trunk Watermain Funds.
_ J
-,
Included in this report is a future Preliminary Assessment Roll showing proposed
assessments for the construction along the west side of Round Lake Boulevard north of
Bunker Lake Boulevard. The assessments would be levied in the future at the time of
connection.
, J
-,
-,
It is proposed that the City of Andover be responsible for the construction along the east
side of Round Lake Boulevard abutting Chapman's Addition at this time. In the future
when watermain is extended in Chapman's Addition, the project cost would be split as
follows:
_J
. J
-.,
50% City cost.
50% Assess to Chapman's Addition
The crossing of Bunker Lake Boulevard east of Round Lake Boulevard would be a City
cost.
_ J
-,
_ J
-,
.J
Estimated Project Cost
-,
1.
Round Lake Boulevard (North of Bunker Lake Boulevard)
Round Lake Boulevard (West Side of Chapman's Addition)
Bunker Lake Boulevard Crossing (East of Round Lake Boulevard)
$25,245
31,540
4.390
$61,175
4,890
10,400
610
610
1.815
$79,500
. J
2.
3.
-,
_ J
- ,
Estimated Construction Cost
_ J
Contingencies
Engineering
Legal
Fiscal
Administration
-,
_ J
-,
_ J
Total Estimated Project Cost
-,
- ,
J
-,
- I
-,
- I
--, -3- 10369
--,
_ J
--,
. J
- ,
. J
-,
. J
-,
_J
--,
. J
--,
. J
-,
, J
--,
_J
-,
_ J
--,
. j
-,
_1
--,
_J
-,
. J
-,
_ J
-,
-,
.J
-,
_J
-,
_ J
Future Assessments
1.
Round lake Boulevard
(North of Bunker Lake Boulevard)
Round lake Boulevard
(West Side of Chapman's Addition)
2.
50% x ($31,540.00 x 1.3)
$32,571.92
$20,501.00
-4-
10369
-,
_ 1
-,
_ J
-,
_ J
-,
_ 1
-1
_ J
-,
_ J
-,
_I
-,
, J
-,
_ 1
-,
_ J
-,
_ 1
-,
.J
-,
_ 1
-,
-J
-1
_ J
--,
-,
.J
--,
_ J
--,
PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE
Round Lake Boulevard-Bunker Lake Boulevard
Watermain Extensions
City Project 93-6
Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 10369
1.
City Council Receives Feasibility Report and
Orders Public Hearing
February 16, 1993
2.
City Council Waives Public Hearing and
Orders Project and Authorizes Engineer
to Prepare Plans and Specifications
March 16, 1993
3.
Engineer Submits Plans for Council Approval and
Receives Authorization to Advertise for Bids
April 20, 1993
April 23 & 30, 1993
April 23 & 30, 1993
May 14,1993
May 18,1993
May, 1993
4.
5,
6.
7.
8.
Advertise in Official Newspaper
Advertise in Construction Bulletin
Open Bids
City Council Receives Bids and Awards Contract
Contractor Begins Construction
9.
Contractor Completes Construction
June, 1993
-5-
10369
-,
_ J
--,
_J
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
--,
Round Lake Boulevard-Bunker Lake Boulevard
Watermain Extensions
City Project 93-6
Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 10369
. j
--,
. J
--,
--,
WATERMAIN - ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD (NORTH OF BUNKER LAKE
BOULEVARD)
Item Unit
No. Description Quantitv Price Amount
1 Mobilization 0.33 LS $1500.00 $ 500.00
2 Connect to Existing Watermain 2.00 EA 300.00 600.00
3 6" DIP Class 50 Watermain 15.00 LF 15.00 225.00
4 8" DIP Class 50 Watermain 1,220.00 LF 15.00 18,300.00
5 6" MJ Resilient Seat Gate Valve 1.00 EA 400.00 400.00
6 8" MJ Resilient Seat Gate Valve 3.00 EA 500.00 1,500.00
7 6" MJ Hub Hydrant 8'-6" 1.00 EA 1,100.00 1 ,100.00
8 MJ CIP Fittings 280.00 LB 1.50 420.00
9 1" Type K Copper Service 120.00 LF 10.00 1,200.00
10 1" Corporation Stop 8.00 EA 50.00 400.00
11 1" Curb Stop with Box 8.00 EA 75.00 600.00
Estimated Construction Cost $25,245.00
_ J
.J
-,
_J
--,
, j
--,
. J
-,
. j
-,
. J
-,
W A TERMAIN - ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD (WEST SIDE OF CHAPMAN'S
ADDITIONS)
. J
-,
Item Unit
No. Description Quantity Price Amount
1 Mobilization 0.33 LS $1,500.00 $ 500.00
2 Connect to Existing Watermain 1.00 EA 300.00 300.00
3 6" DIP Class 50 Watermain 30.00 EA 15.00 450.00
4 8" DIP Class 50 Watermain 1,630.00 LF 15.00 24,450.00
5 6" MJ Resilient Seat Gate Valve 2.00 EA 400.00 800.00
6 8" MJ Resilient Seat Gate Valve 4.00 EA 500.00 2,000.00
7 6" MJ Hub Hydrant 8'-6" 2.00 EA 1,100.00 2,200.00
8 MJ CIP Fittings 560.00 LB 1.50 840.00
Estimated Construction Cost $31,540.00
. j
-,
. J
- ,
-,
--,
-,
_ J
-,
-6-
10369
J
-,
_ J
-,
_J
WATERMAIN - BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD CROSSING (EAST OF ROUND LAKE
BOULEVARD)
-,
_ J
Item
No. Descriotion
Unit
Quantitv Price
-,
_ J
,
. J
-,
- j
,
_ J
-,
_ J
-,
- j
-,
- j
- ,
_ J
,
_ J
- ,
-1
-,
. J
- ,
_ J
-,
-,
_ I
-,
_ J
-,
_ J
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.33 LS $1,500.00
1.00 EA 300.00
1.00 EA 1,200.00
120.00 LF 15.00
1.00 EA 500.00
60.00 LB 1.50
Mobilization
Connect to Existing Watermain
8" Wet Tap on 12" Watermain
8" DIP Class 50 Watermain
8" MJ Resilient Seat Gate Valve
MJ CIP Fittings
Estimated Construction Cost
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
-7-
Amount
$ 500.00
300.00
1,200.00
1,800.00
500.00
90.00
$4,390.00
$61,175.00
10369
--,
_ J
--,
_J
--,
. J
-,
.J
--,
- J
,
_J
~,
_ J
-,
. J
-,
. J
--,
. J
--,
--.J
--,
_ J
--,
_ J
--,
. J
-,
_ J
--,
_ J
- ,
--,
..1
--,
..J
-I
-I
o
IX:
I-
Z
w
:E
(f)
(f)
w
(f)
(f)
c(
>
a:
c(
z
:i
:::i
w
a:
l1.
w
IX:
::l
I-
::l
u..
"E
CU
>
C])
::J
o
(D
~
CU
....I
.....
C])
~
C
::J
(D
I
-o(/)
..... c
lUO cuC'?
>._ _0
C]) (/) 0......
::J C CO (/) .
o~ I C]) 0
(DxC'?CZ
Wenc
C]) .- c
~c13:::Eo
cu.- C]) .-
....Icu.~..::g
~ e C]).-
-ot: >E
cC])l1.oE
::J 1U ~-o
o:>._co
lI::>O<(O
c
C])
E
(Jl
(Jl
liiC])
C5:g
1-<(
c
.2@J
13
c])C])1{)
c ~ C\I
ccu......
oJ::......
00
c ~
.itj ~
E C]).......
..... C) to
C])cu....C'?
cuQ)CUo
~<5"""
@J
C])
g>u..
-....I
e~
u..
-CU
c-
e8
u..u..
en
CO
en en en en en en en en
~~~~~~~~
T-"-'-'-"-'-'-'-
t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--
00000000
..,f..,f..,f..,f..,f..,f..,f.q
~
00000000
00000000
LriLriLriLriLriLriLriLri
C\IC\1C\1C\1C\1C\1C\1C\1
,....,....,-,-,-,....,....,....
....---..-
,....,-,....,....,.......- ,....
~
en en en en en en en
~~~~~~~~
""''''-''''''''''''''''''-''''''''''
to to to to to to to to
I{)I{)I{)I{)I{)I{)I{)I{)
~
00000000
00000000
LriLriLriLriLriLriLriLri
COCO CO co co CO co
C'?C'?C'?C'?C'?C'?C'?
NNNNNNNC\I
~~~~~~~
t--t--t--t--t--t--t--t--
C\IC\1C\1C\1C\1C\1C\1C\1
C\IC\1C\1C\1C\1C\1C\1C\1
I{)I{)I{)I{)I{)I{)I{)
"..:"..:"..:"..:"..:"..:"..:"..:
0000000
,....,....,....,....,-,.... ,...-
o
Z
C])
~
lU
l1.
...-... ..-... ...-...--
<0..-...-_0,-0')0
C\I.qC'?C\I............cot--
--""-'----
C])
E
lU
Z
-
Cl
c ::J
cC]) :::c
.... o~ -
~ ~cu....-15
c C]) += C]).-
lU J:: -o.~ c E CD
-C]) CU C .... t: J:: .- .
"",o.lUJ::OUO
..:::;CJ)CJ)ou..CJ)(D
C'l
CO
C'?
o
,....
C\I
en
......
t--
I{)
C\I
C'?
~
I
to
I
Iii
-
o
I-
I C
ca:z !c:t
a:~o CD om
~w- I
w...JCI) M (1)CD
...J:Jz 0) WM
:JOW I-~~
omt<
mww frl:EO
W~Z (3 "' Z
~<(- a:D: .
<(...J<( c.W:=
:= ~:=
...Ja:a:
OWW >00
z~~ t::zU
:JZ3: U <(
O:J
a:m
z z
<! <!
~ ~
0:: 0::
W W
l-~
~ ~
(!) 0
ZW
_ en
I- 0
(f) a.
- 0
x a::
W a.
I
-
- I
I I
6"
139TH AVE. NW
SUN YWAY
COURT
~
~ to
OJ
~
<t"
~
~
-
f')
~
N ~
C\J
-
138T LN. NW
~
0 Z 0:.
- ~ w
~ 0 \-
- to \- Z
-
- w
z
~ ~ U
en
\D C\J 0
- -
0
12
OJ
a"
I
-I
12"
-
I
BUNKER
AKE BLVD.
Q
::i
CD
~
<(
...J
Q
::::>
o
0::
136TH
N. NW
.
OJ
OJ
5 XT
13
AVE
.
lJJ = 01 10
~ A
J:'
I-
lO UJ
134 TH AVE..
L 1 c.J rz tJ r 1 LJ II r= =1
rl L I ~ II L r-1
1
NW
NW
["1 r 1
C!.c
,;I-It - ~.3
Cordell R Moe
375 157th Ave NW
Andover, Mn 55304
February 15,1993
Dear Andover Council Members
On January 26, 1993 a hearing was held at the Andover City Hall
requesting the sub-division of Omar Dizayee property bordering the
159th street cul-de-sac on the west with Goldenrod cul-de-sac to
the north east, and my property to the south.
What an owner does with his property is generally between the owner
and the city planners. However, in this situation what is or isn't
permitted will affect the property owners along the 159 corridor
from Ilex to University.
Ten years ago I was allowed to situate my passive solar home facing
to the north with the promised easement with Goldenrod in the near
future. As events went on this did not develop for several
reasons, one of which was the expense of traversing the wetland
areas to the south of Goldenrod.
The alternative to the Goldenrod access is the 159th street cul-
de-sac to the east of Ilex. This cul-de-sac lies just 60 feet north
of my property line, because One Hundred and Fifty Ninth does not
follow the lot lines at this point.
At present I understand that Mr Dizayee is selling his property
and the new owner is planning to build. This would not normally
present a problem except the location. of the recent perk test
suggest the building site of the new home lies directly in the
projected path of the extending 159th. At present there are no
plans of extending 159th that I am aware of, however, if the 159th
extension is blocked by building a home at that site, the future
sub-division of my ten acres and the sub-division of the properties
to the east of me will be eliminated.
It is the right of a property owner to build a home, however, this
should not be out of harmony with the future needs of neighboring
land owners. This real estate holds the key to the gate of our
future neighborhood. The building site of any dwelling should take
into consideration the needs of our neighborhood.
Sincerely,
f ~17 /L ~~c
Cordell R Moe
....
--"'"
~.".. .
:7 \
" \
! .~
\ .1
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
February 16, 1993
AGENDA SECTION Approve
NO. Surveying Consultant
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
ITEM
NO.
5.
Todd Haas
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve Caine & Assoc. as survey
for Project 92-27, Commercial Boulevard.
We received two proposals from the following consultants:
Caine & Associates
$1600.00 (not to exceed)
includes Mylars and checking fee.
John Oliver & Associates, Inc.
$2950 plus $300 for mylars
and county checking fee.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
JEFFREY N. CAINE
R.l.S.
~
~
eaiJle .t Associates
J:aJld SlIrve!lors,' JJlC.
17720 HIGHWAY 65
HAM lAKE, MINNESOTA 55304
434-7646
February 11,
1993
DECEIVED
FEB 1 2 1993
CITY OF ANDOVER
Mr. Todd Haas
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard
Andover, MN. 55304
NW.
RE: Estimate for R/W plat for part Df Commercial Blvd. (Project
92-27 )
Dear Mr. Haas:
At your request, have prepared the following estimate of the
cost to provide the City oT Andover with the surveying services
necessary to prepare a plat of the right-of-way of a portion of
Commercial Boulevard:
I will prepare a plat of the.right-of-way of that part
of proposed Commercial Boulevard lying between Hanson
Blvd. and the west I ine of the Southeast Quarter of
Section 34, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County,
Minnesota, for $1300 to $1600, not to exceed $1,600.00.
The survey will include preparation of the plat,
setting iron monuments at al I plat boundary corners and
curve points, write legal descriptions for portions of
underlying properties that lie within the right-of-way
and mylar copies for recording.
We are assuming
existing legal
project.
that the City of Andover wil I provide us with the
descriptions for the parcels adjoining this
We will complete the work within
authorization to proceed.
3 weeks
of receiving
Thank you for the
have any further
please feel free to
opportunity
questions,
contact me.
to
or
submit this proposal. If you
need additional infor~ation,
Yours truly,
Caine & Associates land Surveyors, Inc.
~~~~
Jeffrey N. Caine, President
FAX 6124415665
JO~ OLI\CR ASSC
POI
C;lvfl fngln~~rlng
Lind SurveyIng
lDnd PlannIng
John Oliver & Associates, Inc.
51 0 Dodg~ AWIW~, flJc RIHr, MN SS 330
(61j) 441-j/J'12 . FlU: 441-5665
"
February 16, 1993
RECEIVED
FEB 1 6 1993
CITY OF ANDOVER
Mr. Todd Haas
City of Andover
1685 Northwest Crosstown Boulevard
Andover, Minnesota 55304
Re: Commercial Boulevard Plat
Dear Todd:
Thank you for the request for proposal on the above named plat. We
have reviewed the available information and estimate the following:
1. Prepare right-of-way plat as shown on the sketch.
2. Monument plat at PC's and PT's on right-of-way.
3. Supply underlying legal descriptions for the affected
parcels.
Estimated cost $2,950 plus approximately $300 for mylars and the
County checking fee for the plat document.
Our time frame to start the.project is approximately one week and
completion would be in approximately three weeks from the start.
If there are any questions please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
& Associates, Inc.
. Caswell
"'
OfZtC;
COUNTY OF ANOKA
Depanme1lt of Highways
Paul K. Ruud, Highway Engineer
1440 Bunker Lake Blvd. NW - Andover, Minnesota 55304
Telephone (612) 754-352Q .
FAX (612) 754-3532
Date: z...!II,! '1 ':>
Number of Pages
Including Header
10
PLEASE DELIVER THIS TRANSMISSION TO:
Name:
Company:
Address:
~\M Sc..~~~
Phone: 7s'S - 3'"1 t:lO
C-I \'-1 O~ ..J:...N 00\J~
I
FAX Number. -'SS - .g~'Z-?
From: -.JoJ Ol.-~N
Comments: ~~ 11'-- Q ChJ..'r+-l'O(C.f2.. l~- Mf:eT ~e- ~I.-L.OWIt-J'-
""~ ~ )\o~ ~~I- I~ ~Q.S
W~'f2-~ \ -. ~ ~iZ~
Pe=ta.~ ~R- 'N~- Z. H-~'S
Lt t\oulL W~(L.t:> A,../'J-r - Lt UQ.S
'. 02.16/93
..
16:31 r.ll 0'1_"
75~ 3532
~~
. 0
z
00
C\I
"
~~I NM.U$SO~'?)
., 'v'S? O('lI1Q~ H.l2l0N
. -1 q (.J,., f-
.-ISO!\..\ CO fi1'i DPT
~002
o
~rs
-~
-l::O
cl$
~5
~~
S~
t\;~
~:J~
C')
>;.
\"
o
~
00
I
T
\ t
o In <
tp~~
\",;0.+
q-N<r
., t. '"t~
..-
10
r-
eo
~.:.
~
=(:1)
1+~aLI ~~
c..l
Ztl!
~uJ
o:!:
0)2
~~
. . ....l
J.
~
.
-
c. OJ
QJ c:
C .-
c
>. ....
::I
cu I- >.
:: "0
.c "C ::J
,01 c: -
'- cu CJ)
:c
C]) .-
>. ... c:
- C QJ
C ::J E ,
I
::l 0 I
0 Q)
() > > I
0
cu 0 :::E
'-
--
..ll:: -
0 cu I
c: ...
<( l- I
I
-..3
i'"
\S)
~. 6 N~97G1?J/'\
\ ~ ,:1('.1 1\0 gttJ,il ~
[ID
~
~
~
~
-l 11.,1 r--
..J
<
~ ~ rJ
0 - tc'I
t-
- CIl
- ::w
u.
< C::z - r-\
0 :1:< - -
a: t-..J
Q.
Q.
<
U. ~::w
0 LI. a: ::i a a
w:: <, 0 a
CIl ..J t- ..J i
w
z
< t: % wi
..J
- a: ZI 0
~::l <I - - -
a: ~ ..J\
I \ .. c>l CO)
1- '"
'" 1- ~