The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC January 19, 1993 -----~----------_._---- CITY of ANDOVER j Regular City Council Meeting-January 19, 1993 Call to Order Swearing-in Ceremony Resident Forum Agenda Approval Approval of Minutes Discussion Items 1. Lot Split/1101-161st Avenue N.W. 2. Lot Split/16416 Valley Drive 3. Variance/14471 Bluebird Street N.W. 4. Extend Special Use Permit/Riverdale Church 5. Comprehensive Plan Discussion 6. ATV Ordinance Discussion 7. Eidelweiss Street Discussion/92-21 Staff, Committees, Commissions 8. Appoint Standing Committees 9. Appoint Commission Chairs 10. Appoint Economic Development Committee Members 11. Approve Water Resource Management Plan 12. Approve Signal/Crosstown & Bunker Lake Boulevards ~ 13. Approve Bids/Recycling Pick Up ) 14. Manning & Maintenance of Recycling Center 15. Approve License Fees/Garbage Haulers 16. Approve Kennel License Renewal/Hobnail Dalmatians 17. Declare City Hall Smoke Free 18. Boundary Commission 19. Appoint Election Judges Non-Discussion Items 20. Approve Summary of Garbage Hauler Ordinance 21. Receive December Financial Statements (Unaudited) 22. Amend 1993 General Water & Sewer Fund Budgets 23. Accept Kob's 1st Addition Streets 24. Accept Easement/Lot 1, Block 5, Meadows of Round Lake 25. Approve Speed Limit/university Ave. North of County Road 60 26. Approve Revised Grading Plan/Pheasant Meadows 27. Approve Plans & Specs/92-20/Woodland Creek 3rd 28. Accept Petition/Echo Ridge/92-29 29. Approve Revised Grading Plan/Hidden Creek East 5th 30. Approve Final Payment/91-10/159th Lane, Swallow, Quinn 31. Approve Change Order *1/92-4/Winslow Hills 2nd 32. Release Escrow/Holmberg Addition 33. Approve Change Order *2/92-2/Weybridge 2nd / Mayor/Council Input Approval of Claims Adjournment @i. ~;;~..'. ~\~ ;~ i" A"Y 'j'~~ .,:;i9' '::<_0;';:1,...,-'"'"-- CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APP~OR NO. AGE Approval of Minutes ITEM Admin. t ~ NO. Approval of Minutes V. Volk ~, . BY: The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes: January 5, 1993 Regular Meeting January 5, 1993 Special Meeting January 6, 1993 Special Meeting COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY SECOND BY TO DATE January 19, 1993 @\" ~,c>';\. >,;. \f). ~~ '1 1:' ii . ; ~\': ~ ,i'l , ~i:::".~'::~- CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION January 19, 1993 DATE AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT~ Planning ~ David L. Carlberg, BY: City Planner APPRO~V. OR ::7r i/ ITEM NO. I. Lot Spli t 1101-161st Avenue NW ~ .~~.. REQUEST The Planning and Zoning Commission at its regular meeting on December 22, 1992, reviewed the request for a lot split by Gary and Susan Johnson located at 1101 161st Avenue NW. The applicants are requesting to split a two and one half (2.5 a) acre parcel from a large tract of land owned by Loretta Mary Boyum. Please consult the attached staff report dated December 22, 1992 and the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting for further information. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the lot split request with conditions as indicated on the attached Resolution. , COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE LOT SPLIT REQUEST OF GARY AND SUSAN JOHNSON TO CREATE TWO (2) PARCELS PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 40. WHEREAS, Gary and Susan Johnson have requested to split a two and one-half (2.5 a) acre from a large tract of land to construct a single family home on the property generally located at 1101 161st Avenue NW, legally described on the attached Exhibit A. WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No. 40; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request is consistent with the Comprehensive plan and would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of Andover; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no opposition to said request; and WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the lot split as requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and zoning Commission to allow the lot split on said property with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant pay a park dedication fee of $400.00 pursuant to Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07. 2. That the lot split is subject to a sunset clause as defined in Ordinance No. 40, Section III(E). Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 19th day of January, 1993. CITY OF ANDOVER J. E. MCKelvey, Mayor ATTEST Victor~a Volk, City Clerk '\ ) EXHIBIT A That part of the Northeast Quarter lying westerly of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way; Except the West 300 feet of the South 363 feet thereof; Also except that part as described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast Corner of said tract, thence South along said railroad right-of-way 528 feet, thence West at right angles 49.5 feet, thence North at right angles 528 feet +or- to the North line of said Quarter, thence East along said North line to the place of beginning; Except Roads; Subject to easements of record. '\ ... ~'~ 1/0. .) CITY of ANDOVER /\1'\j ~LANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - DECEMBER 22, 1992 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and zoning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Bonnie Dehn on December 22, 1992, 7:30 p.m. at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners present: Maynard Apel, Steve Jonak, Bev Jovanovich, Marc McMullen, Becky Pease, Randy Peek None City Planner, David Carlberg Others Commissioners absent: Also present: APPROVAL OF MINUTES December 8, 1992: Correct as written. MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Pease, approval of the Minutes as presented. Motion carried unanimously. . .;'PUBLIC HEARING: \J9 JOHNSON LOT SPLIT, 1101 161ST AVENUE NW - GARY AND SUSAN 7:31 p.m. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the request of Gary and Susan Johnson to subdivide a 2.5-acre parcel from a large track of land located at 1101 161st Avenue NW. It meets all ordinance requirements, and Staff recommends approval contingent upon the payment of $400 in park dedication fees and the surveying of the lots within one year of City Council approval. He also noted the future planning of the larger tract that was done by the owners to meet ordinance requirements for road frontage, road access, and lots. Chairperson Dehn opened the public hearing. There was no testimony. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by McMullen, to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by McMullen, to recommend to the City Council the approval of the lot split of Gary and Susan Johnson to create two parcels per Ordinance No. 40 as presented by the Staff. Motion carried unanimously. This will be on the January 19, 1993, City Council agenda. 7:38 p.m. , PUBLIC HEARING: LOT SPLIT, 16416 VALLEY DRIVE NW - LARRY EMMERICH 7:38 p.m. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the lot split request of Larry Emmerich to subdivide a 7+-acre parcel into two parcels exceeding the minimum lot requirements of Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 located at 16416 Valley ". CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE December 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM 3. Public Hearing: Lot Split - 1101 161st Avenue NW - Gary & Sue Johnson ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning ~ David L. carlber~ BY: City Planner APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: Request The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the lot split request of Gary and Susan Johnson to subdivide a two and one-half (2.5 a.) acre parcel from a large tract of land. The property is located at 1101 161st Avenue NW. The property is legally described on the attached resolution. Applicable Ordinances Ordinance No. 40 regulates the division of lots. A lot split is defined as any division of a lot, parcel or tract of land into not more than two (2) parcels when both divided parcels meet or exceed the minimum requirements for platted lots in the applicable zoning district. , Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 establishes the provisions for minimum lot width, lot depth and lot area in an R-1 zoned district. The minimum requirements in an R-1 district are as follows: Lot Width at Front Setback Lot Depth Lot Area Per Dwelling 300 feet 150 feet 2.5 acres Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07.10 establishes the m~n~mum area of land dedicated to park and open space. For all subdivisions by metes and bounds description the subdivider or developer may elect to pay, in lieu of the park dedication requirements, the sum of four hundred dollars ($400.00) for each dwelling unit that could be constructed upon the proposed subdivided property. In the event the developer elects to pay said four hundred dollar ($400.00) charge, the City may collect additional park fees if the developer re-subdivides the property in the future. Review The purpose of the lot split is to create a lot for the construction of a single family home. Page Two Lot Split - Doug and Sue Jonson 1101 161st Avenue NW December 22, 1992 / Commission Options 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval of the lot split requested by Gary and Susan Johnson located at 1101 161st Avenue NW, legally described on the attached resolution. The Commission finds that based on Section IV of Ordinance No. 40, the City Council may vary the application of any of the provisions in Ordinance No. 40 and that the variance request is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of Andover. 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend denial of the lot split requested by Gary and Susan Johnson located at 1101 161st Avenue NW, legally described on the attached resolution. The Commission finds the request does not meet the requirements of Ordinance No. 40. In denying the request, the Commission shall state those reasons for doing so. " 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item pending further information from Staff. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the lot split requested by Gary and Susan Johnson located at 1101 161st Avenue NW, legally described on the attached resolution with the following conditions: 1. The applicant pay park dedication fees in the amount of $400. 2. The applicant shall have the lots surveyed and pay the park dedication fees within one year of City Council approval. \. CITY of ANDOVER LOT SPLIT I LOT SPLIT REQUEST FORM " Property Address /101 I&/sr IkE-.tfluJ./Ik1>>IJ6f',AiAJ55.-ifJc! Legal Description of Property: (Fill in whichever. is appropriate): Lot Block Addi tion Plat Parcel PIN j//~ ~"'4 d~ /2- 0,1,1-3. (If metes and bounds, attach the comp ete ega --------------------------------------------------------------------- Reason for Request M 7?/iu1 .5f/k(tE ;;:kmiUl-::JJtf/fLIIAJy -(.iY:Jt/CflffR!J Current Zoning /{-I --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of Applicant t:4/ty r' $;~'A-rI/ <JiHltlS1Jt! Address L1~ /~~ ~f. 4/11./. /.),/$)('(IZJIA) ~Oy' Home Phone '1- 9 Bus. ness Phone B - &55 (fcLYf1'!) Signature Date 1/-/Q-9z_ --------- ---------------------------------------------- Property Owner (Fee Owner) dRs, &!LOll/J uJ~ ~1.llltf.1 ~;('(iTT# j,~.) (If different from above} 'I ~ Address /101 /t'o/,,/. ~f. AJ.dJ J .,ftt;f(JJJ{Pykilj 55-1P( Home Phone /SV-j, 7~ Business Phone ,11/4 . ~~~::~:::_~~~~::_---------~:~:_-~~~:=::~-------- LOT SPLIT PAGE 2 Attach a scaled drawing of the proposed split of the property showing: scale and North arrow; dimensions of the property and structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent street names; location and use of existing structures within 100 feet. ~ . ~The date the property became a lot of record, the names and addresses ~ of all property owners within 350 feet of the property. proposed to be split, and the complete legal description of the subject p~operty must . also be provided. 1ZI-47~O I hereby certify that this property has not been subdivided within the last three years. Lot Spli t .. .~ ~. ~ ;:::::~pp nt - .j{'r~ Recording Date Paid 1\/30h7.Yecel~t # 4~~f f. Park Dedication: Date Paid Receipt # ... Rev. 1-07-92:d'A Res. 179-91 (11-05-91) -p .:01/: if lei 3:<. . , ;?/ / Z- oocJ3 -Pt?O~CX71j J)6;SCKIPII~t): /itAI 7/(1 OF '3 N Rlf OF .s- 0"'&3 fJr ;11~ f{; LVt I-I/I:.-Y RfiVj eX IN' ~OD fT F T ;1/ € I? t5 t1.f.J ./~\ c~~~~~ &t~) I -.....,;1 \.,_ i ill I 1.1 III . I Ii I I ;~: ' Iii I "il l I I J ,i!1 I 0' Ilil 0' l 1"1 ~,' ~i_ --------__...._______ _ L___ iJ --\ ::::::::::::::----io=~.:::::::::::- i~ ':,~,oo' _ '~orL _ I u~.. I I ',. : ' --:::- -_ I' '31.; - , " I --~Go::-:J'i?'" ',E ,)ITF', / I \ i /'/ I~ I ~~ --~il( ,-,_:>~,~ ~ ~ . -/'!. I ~, Ii n : ~ r ',',', >"~~ i ; - I / ~ I CI--'IA.r-- J I ! 't ~ : ' ) '( "--:t~ ~I-' ,_,Hf?" 1"',"..', "- , ! ; i ~ ! i 11)~ II 'J-c/ ~ ~"""r~~L:~. I ' I' n.,' I H.:..i I', '_c . : ! .1:1 HI ~ n Ir' ~_L1-::t :-:.1 I ! J i i -L~ Ill' _~' r-J r ~-p~!~, : . Ii I J. -...,.,.J " rn I, :: Ii ,r ,I~. ~ i i \' "j '--! I I lil:i I' , LJ' :.. T' ~l ~ I I -I 1'=, -- -, -: J~~~~i -I: I ~ 1 I I I I ,r'I'T I .~ p, : I ," I~ I' i . ---: I I " I I '--'. ..:1 -+ .:.. -:- ~. I , -i ~ --------, I ---- .... -" I I ~ .I iy/ -' " I _ ~~ v' f-- ~- -...-; I ~ : - I ib;:~ I R:.'~ J ~ ~" ! " V\ I--i I '="kW,t.~, ~H --~- -~ ~... ---+1 ----Ti- .-J ~. ~.~'~,... I I_T NIGHnNG'ALE I ~ i ,...., ,II _~EST;~, ~ I' 1 ~ I I'l--:"l . ' /o~K.1 ' = :-- I / ~ I ~,I , ' ..~ -- JI~: .~.~.~ i . Ii" ! I I ........ ""''-'-: : /' ! . ''"'. ,I. I ':t';a'H/I' I: ,I ;t.,j,Ur i \l ' t,' ?i-/ r----- ( ---~- ~- .- , ~. , - ~ ~ !~'I' \I~ ~,;;/;' I ,\ ~~' ~. ~ j1,AI.C ~ "'" ,~ '~-. I' . I 011 I --~,' "" ' 'tt -, t,- r-:- i I : ,,,,I ., ,. I .' .\.'\." . I ' ~.G..~ II I j ".:'7-~--"~1_------~#-~.: I -:-::_~ - 1----::-::. ~========,:;;~f_-------- I '" I I; I I I " "I ',', I i ~ I ',', I . I I i ',~, I ~ I I ' ,', :! 1 ' , -, 't I SftOrHERSl1 / I '[I , ff I i i T. I ': III : \ I I !II ,/N :11 :d " ~ I U1Br-.'~~j.~" I I' 81 "~'. I ~ I ':J', !' I ~>~',I i I I II ~,II \ \ ~ 1- r-- i 1 , , C ---- / L i ~'QE'" ,LEEMAN. \~: II' . I .~~~ . , -.,." ; ',~ Et"MTW, .;;. ~OOJ7;'Ip.y~t: ~"";"'''''..T:+'$to''''''I'''lr'T ---L ~I I , ! , I I I I V 7:f. . l , ...L ........... .......--....---.. , , / ' ......- j-.. I i I -.X.. ~ -/~''''1 I i I , . :.. '. / '. j'otO (z) ..WAY --~ ENTER SEC./4 ...--" " '" -! r " \ t; . , .' (.3) ~ ~ ~ ~:/ ;1.~ /'~!li ~" ~ .-!! ~ A.~l..r../.~. .V;',.10"" ,;'- _'7:: Co; .' 161 5T. AVENUE ,',,/5<?' _ _"'c.".~' ..:"t'<,." t_" (13) .. V. N ..- ........ '. r.~,..b-'f.'.!!"'" . - , ". P~.A T N.W. .,' " , " . I , ..--' --=L ........................ 1-4-0/ .' " '. JD:.....-......J ~ ~? . /\ Z.S':3 '3, I , , . , , 'to- 'z .... :2i '.... '<1), ,<ell I....' 'i :1 Ii II : i I z a: W ,.~..::J:..- :.- :a: :0 :z I , , , , , I I 1 , , , I , I , , , , , , , , I I I I, ! I I, I I I, , I : I : I : I I ....., 'z' ~; :~I ,~ I: : ;1 : I Z o r- ~ z J .' , , ! , i / ..:L ! , , " -t _"_" I (t) ST~ "bel ~. ~ A.~/,N'I ~75""1' ";../;::~' Ni I E t eJlAdA!. !Z~ D-WI [. . J (lroJ..J I :r..c. ......, I \4 . IX o I " ~ "- '\ ~) J: 11 _==::- .---?- - '" - ~'~o \ -~\ ~\ - \ -- . " . \ , 'I I ...;'''''"'~.... (~) ~/ CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W, . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday, December 22, 1992 at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the lot split request of Gary and Susan Johnson located on the following legally described property: That part of the Northeast Quarter lying westerly of the Burlington Northern RailRoad right-of-way; Except the West 300 feet of the South 363 feet thereof; Also except that part as described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast Corner of said tract, thence South along said railroad right-of-way 528 feet, thence West at right angles 49.5 feet, thence North at right angles 528 feet +or- to the North line of said Quarter, thence East along said North line to the place of beginning; Except Roads; Subject to easements of record. (Generally located at 1101 161st Avenue NW) All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and location. A copy of the application and proposed lot split will be available at Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting. ~/dO Victor~a Volk, City Clerk Publication dates: December 11, 1992 December 18, 1992 Burlington Northern Inc 777 Main St Fort Worth, TX 76102 'vid E & Geraldine dorst 1292 - 161st Ave NW Anoka, MN 55304 David J & Judith A Luoma 16572 Sycamore St NW Andover, MN 55304 Merrill J & V Putnam 718 Polk St Anoka, MN 55303 Mary A White 971 - 161st Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 ~~mes L & K A Stelzig , )3 - 161st Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 ~~g~ Reynold N & Sharon JOrstad 16034 Crosstown Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 Durwood H & Lorna J Sagvold 1092 - 161st Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 Thomas L & Jane L Banken 16526 Sycamore St NW Andover, MN 55304 Perri J Medin 16440 Ward Lk Dr NW Andover, MN 55304 Ricky & Joan Davis 1177 - 161st Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 Dorothy E Aasness 16425 Hanson Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 Allen L & Janie M Hemmelgarn 1054 - 161st Ave NW Andover, MN 55304 Allen Palo 16608 Ward Lk Dr NW Andover, MN 55304 Dick Kuiken 7718 Knollwood Dr Mpls, MN 55432 Lila M Sanders 10101 Dupont Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55431 Merrill J & V. Putnam 718 Polk St Anoka, MN 55303 " / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '. ,. ....;::;--":,":~ January 19, 1993 DATE AGENDA SECTION NO, D' . t ~SCUSs~on I ems ITEM NO, .R. MOTION BY \ TO ,- ,':::'r'......... 16416 Valley Drive Larry Emmerich ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT~ Planning ~ David L. Carlberg, BY: Ci ty Planner ~'PRO~D ~'R G~Nj~~ BY/V V REQUEST , The Planning and Zoning Commission at its regular meeting on December 22, 1992, reviewed the request for a lot split by Larry Emmerich located at 16416 Valley Drive. The applicant is requesting to split a seven (7 a) acre parcel into two (2) parcels exceeding the minimum requirements of the R-l, Single Family Rural zoning district. Please consult the attached staff report dated December 22, 1992 and the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting for further information. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the lot split request with conditions as indicated on the attached Resolution. COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY . , J CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE LOT SPLIT REQUEST OF LARRY EMMERICH TO CREATE TWO (2) PARCELS PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 40. WHEREAS, Larry Emmerich has requested to split a 7+ acre parcel in half to construct a single family home on the property generally located at 16416 Valley Drive, legally described on Exhibit A. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No. 40; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of Andover; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no opposition to said request; and ; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the lot split as requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission to allow the lot split on said property with the following conditions: , 1. That the applicant pay a park dedication fee of $400.00 pursuant to Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07. 2. That the lot split is subject to a sunset clause as defined in Ordinance No. 40, Section III(E). Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 19th day of January, 1993. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor Victoria Volk, C~ty Clerk / EXHIBIT A That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota which lies westerly of the center line of County Road No. 58 (aka Valley Drive) and lying northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the interior of the north line of said Quarter, Quarter with the center line of said road; thence southerly along said center line 749.2 feet to the place of beginning of the line to be described; thence westerly to a point on the west line of said Quarter, Quarter, 570 feet north of the southwest corner thereof; Except Roads, Subject to easements of record. , , -'-='~''''''''' /;tj}.~\] \1'\ J ..~';::;Y%LANNING CITY of ANDOVER , / AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - DECEMBER 22, 1992 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Bonnie Dehn on December 22, 1992, 7:30 p.m. at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners present: Maynard Apel, Steve Jonak, Bev Jovanovich, Marc McMullen, Becky Pease, Randy Peek None City Planner, David Carlberg Others Commissioners absent: Also present: APPROVAL OF MINUTES December 8, 1992: Correct as written. MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Pease, approval of the Minutes as presented. Motion carried unanimously. -' PUBLIC HEARING: JOHNSON LOT SPLIT, 1101 161ST AVENUE NW - GARY AND SUSAN 7:31 p.m. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the request of Gary and Susan Johnson to subdivide a 2.5-acre parcel from a large track of land located at 1101 161st Avenue NW. It meets all ordinance requirements, and Staff recommends approval contingent upon the payment of $400 in park dedication fees and the surveying of the lots within one year of City Council approval. He also noted the future planning of the larger tract that was done by the owners to meet ordinance requirements for road frontage, road access, and lots, Chairperson Dehn opened the public hearing. There was no testimony. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by McMullen, to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by McMullen, to recommend to the City Council the approval of the lot split of Gary and Susan Johnson to create two parcels per Ordinance No. 40 as presented by the Staff. Motion carried unanimously. This will be on the January 19, 1993, City Council agenda. 7:38 p.m. @PUBLIC HEARING: LOT SPLIT, 16416 VALLEY DRIVE NW - LARRY EMMERICH ~' 7:38p.m. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the lot split request of Larry Emmerich to subdivide a 7+-acre parcel into two parcels exceeding the minimum lot requirements of Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 located at 16416 Valley Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - December 22, 1992 Page 2 (Public Hearing: Lot Split, 16416 Valley Drive NW, Continued) Drive. Permission will be needed from the Anoka County Highway Department for a driveway access, but Mr. Carlberg did not see a problem with that. Staff recommended approval contingent upon the payment of $400 in park dedication fees and the surveying of the lots within one year of City Council approval. Chairperson Dehn opened the public hearing. There was no testimony. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Jovanovich, to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Pease, Seconded by Jovanovich, to forward to the City Council with the recommendation of approval as presented in the Resolution for the lot split with two conditions, that being Numbers 1 and 2 at the end of the Resolution. Motion carried unanimously. This will be on the January 19, 1993, City Council agenda. 7:43 p.m. VARIANCE: ORDINANCE NO. 10, SECTION 9.06a(3), 39,000 SQUARE FOOT REQUIREMENT FOR A BUILDABLE LOT - 17539 FLINTWOOD STREET NW, TWIN STAR HOMES, INC. \ Mr. Carlberg explained the request of Twin Star Homes, Inc., to vary from the 39,000-square-foot requirement to construct a home at 17539 Flintwood Street NW. The request is to vary 3,300 feet from the requirement, as the lot has 35,700 square feet of contiguous land which meets the minimum width and depth. The reason for the variance request is because of the wetland. As long as he has been with the City, there have been no variances granted for this requirement; however, the DNR has since become much more restrictive on the filling of wetland. Soil borings have already been done. Commissioner Apel acknowledged that in the past this was not a problem because the areas were filled to meet the 39,000 square-foot requirement; however, that cannot be done today. He questioned the intent of the 39,000 square feet, asking how much land is really needed to change the septic system twice. In this case, to deny the request would deny the owner the right to build on that lot. If there is no other problem with the lot, he would recommend the variance be granted. Commissioner Peek preferred to table the item to get more information from the Building Department requiring the minimum requirement, possibly a recommendation on the percentage range in which a variance would be allowable. Commissioner Janak felt the 39,000 square-foot number must also be addressed as to whether it is a realistic number or whether something smaller is acceptable. He did not want to create problems in the future with more variances from this provision. Ralph Pearson, 2201 198th Avenue, Cedar, Twin Star Homes, Inc. - stated the lot is sold, and the owners would like to build. The survey has been done for the property, plus soil borings. Placing the basement "- , / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUESTF,OR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE December 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM 4. Public Hearing: Lot Split - 16416 Valley Drive Larry Emmerich ORIGINATING DEPARTMEN~ Planning ~ David L. Carlberg BY: City Planner APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: Request The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review the lot split request of Larry Emmerich to subdivide a 7+ acre parcel into two parcels exceeding the minimum lot requirements of Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02. The property is located at 16416 Valley Drive. The property is legally described on the attached resolution. Applicable Ordinances Ordinance No. 40 regulates the division of lots. A lot split is defined as any division of a lot, parcel or tract of land into not more than two (2) parcels when both divided parcels meet or exceed the minimum requirements for platted lots in the applicable zoning district. Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 establishes the provisions for minimum lot width, lot depth and lot area in an R-l zoned district. The minimum requirements in an R-l district are as follows: Lot Width at Front Setback Lot Depth Lot Area Per Dwelling 300 feet 150 feet 2.5 acres Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07.10 establishes the minimum area of land dedicated to park and open space. For all subdivisions by metes and bounds description the subdivider or developer may elect to pay, in lieu of the park dedication requirements, the sum of four hundred dollars ($400.00) for each dwelling unit that could be constructed upon the proposed subdivided property. In the event the developer elects to pay said four hund~ed dollar ($400.00) charge, the City may collect additional park fees if the developer re-subdivides the property in the future. Review The purpose of the lot split is to create a lot for the construction of single family home. Page Two Lot Split - Larry Emmerich \ 16416 Valley Drive / December 22, 1992 Commission Options 1. The Planning and zoning Commission may recommend approval of the lot split requested by Larry Emmerich located at 16416 valley Drive, legally described on the attached resolution. The Commission finds that based on Section IV of Ordinance No. 40, the City Council may vary the application of any of the provisions in Ordinance No. 40 and that the variance request is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive plan and would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of Andover. 2. The Planning and zoning Commission may recommend denial of the lot split requested by Larry Emmerich located at 16416 Valley Drive, legally described on the attached resolution. The Commission finds the request does not meet the requirements of Ordinance No. 40. In denying the request, the Commission shall state those reasons for doing so. 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item pending further information from Staff. staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the lot split requested by Larry Emmerich located at 16461 Valley Drive, legally described on the attached resolution with the following conditions: 1. The applicant pay park dedication fees in the amount of $400. 2. The applicant shall have the lots surveyed and pay the park dedication fees within one year of City Council approval. \ / -' CITY of ANDOVER " " LOT SPLIT It LOT SPLIT REQUEST FORM Property Address !HI/6 Va. lie v {)/yJe ;1J W I Legal Description of Property: (Fill in whichever is appropriate): Lot Block Addi tion PIN ~ tJ~AeA attach the complete egal) eEr-ftp,(A-fto J2-f:~ Plat Parcel (If metes and bounds, --------------------------------------------------------------------- Reason for Request ~p h d- (\" \ ~, S?H Current Zoning --------------------------------------------------------------------- Emm-er/~ Address Vw H~me p,hon. ~LfZ?'- L/j't~ _~ Busine..' Phon. s~gnat~ ,_ '~-:-9' J CJ1#1 .p Date / /- 2,j -/2- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Property Owner (Fee Owner) (If different from above) Address ~t11~ tt5 a Go O.e ~ Home Phone Business Phone Signature Date --------------------------------------------------------------------- " ( LOT SPLIT PAGE 2 J Attach a scaled drawing of the proposed split of the property showing: scale and North arrow; dimensions 01 the property and structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent street names; location and use of existing structures within 100 feet. " The date the property'became a lot of record, the ,names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet of the property proposed to be split, and the complete legal description of the subject property must also be provided. I hereby certify that this property has not been subdivided within the last three years. ~ Lot Split Fee: $100.00 Recording Fee: $ 15.00 Date Paid /!-Z7-9z. Receipt Jt 4*'1-2 Park Dedication: Date Paid Receipt Jt I Rev. 1-07-92:d'A Res. 179-91 (11-05-91) " /a\~~~ r I,~~- - /~'~ .~'; ~'~I):-;----"-;-~~-J--rl' p ~ \ \.\';- all.(~\ H;LL!k~,1 ',' ,,' ~ I I ' , '.",,,~,, ;;;a'~ ,2 ~Gl 'I '. ' I /1'1l - ~ Y l:;'. , . , "! .. ," - I I" ! : \~ ~f. :,,,,~'Q7!..,. ,~, , I I I I ;' __ _' ~J-;- _~_' ;'.. I, I I '-,-' I I ~ tr " - : IL:A-=irH~I"', , ~ I ' 4~'(", . 13' I' I' . "tf.: 'rt '., '~~ ., :--:""''','I'i''CEOA'' ",'Ris,'r, 1'",.",., ~~o.is,.' _;",?-.P(N~~:!j! / , ~'( ..~ ., .. o. ,<,,.. " .,,~ , I, I,' ""-'1i!..' ....."...'f'"''A.E,~.,i.......'''''.I, I 0 .~. .,.. ',,, , l--l . IZf'l " J ""'."0. ~ ~ _ ___ J ,.~ ! _ " _ , ,~~',:_~~~O~:'>fC;;: ;~"_;: ' ,) '.',' ~~_'". ~~OA O::,,~; : "ll';;t~:~" ~ '-- tr :'-l '\\ I '~2:S"i~A~~~r~E~:,:~:::: - - i ---I; , L ---L_ 2;~1~. ~ r-:- ';'I"'2"'I'~'I""'li : !- (n'''' --- I ~_mh) ~~. : ';.~~~hml---L I j I U \ -~i~2M" . ~1'~' -. i'~:~ ,~I I I . c/o, ' ,:'. "'~ ' 1"1 './ ',PRAIRIE.,' .21 11' "'~' P;NE ,=--. , , I ----f------ __________ ' .~. 7, !,;//"CREs,r' ! ,I, ,.,1 ': ~'MEAqOWS I I I I WViI I I I: I I I ~I L-L-J f'i"" ~ ! I L------L---- ____ ! Wf-l '" I Ll II ~::::// "i, I t-~~'/I!!II." : I 1 r---:t ~ '"'!I'IL. L I ~,~., I ,"I, I I '; I ,I '-" fF\i~'~.~d~r!:.~- ~'--;/ I I H -. NO. 6 -. I,' /1 L. NO_~ ~ II I :: -,~ -. i~~~: "',Ii ' I" _ I I _.Sf.J. v;;'- ~ i /!-----i.4iDi~,' ....." - I I I' -. ~ ,ij, _ _ _ A, ~1--1 Yf---j,H~E,S,\').;\ - - -. I - - r i- """ h'sr--!," . / / ' I i "L_ ~ '- _. _ ,It.L-, .... .., -.. / /. ~ .. ~' , ~~----: I-- I, ~ - ',1 -~M72-' ~~. 7~ '1)--' ~ I 'I~ ';L. "€I~'\'\' '''I~,: ~i = L W- J-(/-. ~ '/jy~!d)(4l-;' I I jli : I: c' '-- ~,,-~~ ~_ T _' ~'.f~ -,,,\-,-A ~r-r ,I. H ':-r- I' .' ~RtIA/'f"'PfJ, f-:-, I' .;. , 1/ ' ...' ':-:..~-J[:7:.:Jr ,MEA WS, ',"",.I 1-..../ ff/. ... ~\RAM:HESTATES ~- I a ~!P; ,,:'.. J r } J : . ~--.:... [;;;t M . . "T. _ " ~ r-- I I U' ;,! ~ ' ~. rr 3 '....'rER~1 ~ I.' 5 ", = I-- i I -- ~,,~ .~' u,.J-.....JL, I- I" . - I-- I; : ri ......-m", ---. .~.y 'I/;-j - I-- I I "- ~' ~. -\'~~. _', .:.! . J;,. '- I -/ I -.-';--;- -- '~"i,r--,\ 5 'J fI T ,4 7 J ..a v~'! ~ ....:.... ";D."}A~ MEADC1;"~ ~ n 'I", /i.:Zc: ~. ~'i.L;~~~.J __ I I:; : : .: \~";OR" T' :i I[ I :-.~' . ~ ",71././ , /..:: '.' i " ~~, ';,' ", i .' :-.., '\ ~ I,~_I;' -A'4' K. . ~\IJ/ . \";' ~J.:E \' ',t.l!:~;;~,i*'.s~~::~Up~Jg~::::~+~ I R:c ..", \" {, ,F1, I ESTArEsl~ ~Gfr I ' . , / I I --i V!fL IL , ~'il~~ I I II ! I II I _ I. , ,~,,.: '.l... . ___t-+- rP/fj.., ..-:: . , r.;.;;;/iS>t V, ~ H~J, - ~.1~H '~ 1I ~ I - -,-- ) / " ~. ''-..!...' , - , t t-- .~, r~' i ",',7.' , L , - f., - L"_'_ t.-.~.;. :. ";. ....._, ~ ~. ... I tiJ " ;> - a: 1 .JJ ..u ~ I (0 +1 'P. ~.s ~ 6C) I :l: 0 <r (!) a: >l- I+- ~ ~ (!) ClJ - i,. .... .0 -:>- {\ 2' lJ -_ tJ, ~:2t "'. ('C'\ 13:;1,0' l r- J-..9 ' t') I ~ ~ -- .. t:.. ~I 1', 9.; , '25"-'7 ::- t (.1/ ' '" 2. III ,T ~-0 ... " , " , ...,. 4-Z7JO ~C30) I ;.....,I..J. TobU.< Ifo'fv-VtI) u.J.~ I/e Sw (5) '.. @ 8 . --1. ,t' 89.J~'=~. ';'/ J~ '( Q..,1. ~~ l()) . ," ~i ! --- J.;.....,....;:: ..,~~.:~. ~.. ,':.' ';:'Q:~)'.;; "'<h'",.," 4. ..~5o M ..JCo.,~ SOT. .L (If) (#40) ; '" '" co, RD. NO. 58 '" '" €' or co. ~D. ,va. 58) ~ TH'€ NdKTN t'/A/e t'T n,-c NW y~ "/,,, TNe N"WY4 dF SEC. /7/ TJZ, A'. Z4 N49.47'ZS"C 4".79 ({}N(Y ~ET ToICN.TKIW) { 1V89- ,o'E 4{)fI.'l7 33 P--,:' R/W {lAIc o.&' co. No. Nt). 58 1.11' "'...., \ "'''.05 . t:'ORNE..e../ .'W~4 dF /4 o~ S~C /7 ~4- ,. .MON.) ,,'? 3~ ( <:Q It) ~ ". ... () oS W '" '" r'"l I t'- ;: ~I t') ~ 0 ;Q '" ~ <\ ~ " ~ '" '" '" ~ , I ~ I ~ 0, " ... ... ~ , ~ r: ~ ~ ~ ~ }.. ~ " " " ... .,. " "- ~ ~ ~ " , ~ ::l ... ,- ... '" . '" ~ '< " j \.. ~ >i. '" I' ~ . q:o' '" o '" ... " \0 N @ ~.. ~ ~ _. ------..--.: - '", ~ Ii;, '" '"' \(\ o tv) r-- (i) ~~-_. .; <>1-7$- , ~ ~~ r ... <:---, C<s:' -... " ;\ \ '3 ';1\ I \ "'!i I \ ~ ~~! ~tL,_ __ ___ _ 4'/fm.J.IJ.''''rl - " I rl ~ < lj) <Xl '" ~ ~ ~ Q '{ " " " ~! \ \ , , , \ f ~ I ~ 3'.93. 7~ N89'4S'S4-e:: 33.Z8 4Z7-0e:. rr -ir C"THE NO;r{TJI lJA/!: or TNt!: SdUTI'( .57C].ao -II'S 'C; ~ ~ " ~ C). ~ ... \ , ~3 '" ~ ... .,; '" ~ ~ ~ " o '" '" '" "* --. .. ~ '" ... .. li! I ... .... ~ '1 '. '1 , " -- "3 '" '" 'I; ~ Q ~ ,'<} " , . "- ~ 33 / "'.',',1,' ;rJ:~'>'~'"O:'C''''\,....,\ \ J \f'Y ~~~.. CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW, . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday, December 22, 1992 at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the lot split request of Larry Emmerich located on the following legally described property: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota which lies westerly of the center line of County Road No. 58 (aka Valley Drive) and lying northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the interior of the north line of said Quarter, Quarter with the center line of said road; thence southerly along said center line 749.2 feet to the place of beginning of the line to be described; thence westerly to a point on the west line of said Quarter, Quarter, 570 feet north of the southwest corner thereof; Except Roads, Subject to easements of record. (Generally located at 16416 Valley Drive NW) All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and location. A copy of the application and proposed lot split will be available at Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting. ~ta V~ctor~a Volk, City Clerk Publication dates: December 11, 1992 December 18, 1992 n ~,1 Julia A. & Ronald H. 13165 Meadwood Curve #30 Coon Rapids, Mn 55433 - -'id P Brotzler - 449 Winnetka Ave N Brooklyn Park, MN 55445 Ed & Elaine Kovar 15710 Dakotah st NW Andover, MN 55304 Thomas & Janis Redman 16541 Valley Dr NW Andover, Mn 55433 Palmer W & K M Nelson 4048 - 165th Ave NW Anoka, MN 55304 Marvin & Pearl Tobeck 16390 Valley Dr NW Andover, MN 55304 Robert & Elizabeth 16357 Valley Dr NW Andover, MN 55304 Richard Snyder 16445 Valley Dr NW Andover, MN 55304 John B & Lilian Heinen 6370 - 143rd Ln NW Anoka, MN 55303 ~~+~ , ~~. "<~;:,.'>.\~; (A 'P\ i ,\,~ ," I '.. ~"~'i / --':"-:'::""'r"......-"" CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION January 19, 1993 DATE AGENDA SECTION NO, Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT~ lanning David L. Carlberg, City Planner BY: ~~ct\r BY/V ITEMvar~ance S~oeyard NQ Setback - 14471 Bluebird -f. st. NW - Builders Plus REQUEST Builders Plus, Inc. has requested a variance to Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 to allow for the construction of a deck encroaching nine (9') feet into the required sideyard setback on the property located at 14471 Bluebird Street NW, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Old Colony Estates. The property is zoned R-4, Single Family Urban. BACKGROUND For background information on the request, please consult the attached staff report presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the minutes from their December 22, 1992 meeting. ! PLANNING AND ZONING RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their December 22, 1992 meeting, made the motion to recommend to the City Council approval of the variance request. The motion was however defeated by a 3 YES, 4 NO vote. Therefore, the recommendation to the City Council by the Planning and Zoning Commission is to deny the request. Attached is a resolution for Council review and approval. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY " CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA / RES. NO. A RESOLUTION DENYING THE VARIANCE REQUEST OF BUILDERS PLUS, INC.TO ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 6.02 WHICH REQUIRES A FIFTEEN (15') FOOT SIDEYARD SETBACK FROM THE INTERIOR LOT LINE ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14471 BLUEBIRD STREET NW, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 1, OLD COLONY ESTATES. WHEREAS, Builders Plus, Inc. has requested a variance to Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 which requires a total setback of fifteen (15') feet from the side interior property line when the plans for the principal structure accommodate an access for a deck on the property located at 14471 Bluebird Street NW, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, OLD COLONY ESTATES; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request does not meet the criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04 in that no hardship exists due to practical difficulties which would preclude the property owner reasonable use of the property; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council denial of the variance request as it does not meet the criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04. "- ) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and hereby denies the variance requested by Builders Plus, Inc. located at 14471 Bluebird Street NW, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, OLD COLONY ESTATES. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 19th day of January, 1993. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk " J Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - December 22, 1992 '\ Page 3 / (Variance: Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.06a(3), 39,000-Square-Foot Requirement for a Buildable Lot - 17539 Flintwood Street, Continued) above the mottled soils is not a problem, plus the foundation will be four feet above the street. The driveway is in place; the utilities are in the street. The problem is the wetland around the area, and the DNR doesn't want the wetland filled. In addition, there are quite a few mature trees on the lot, and they will have to work with the Tree Preservation Policy to avoid filling to save them. They would prefer not to fill the additional 3,300 square feet necessary to meet the 39,000 square foot requirement. He stated the county's criteria for a buildable lot is 11,000 square feet, which is considerably smaller. The Commission discussed the 39,000 square feet, questioning how that number was determined. Is it realistic or would another number be adequate to meet the septic system needs. They felt someone should be able to tell them what is the very minimum requirements for rural septic systems and still meet the health, safety, welfare issues. Chairperson-Dehn summarized the Commission's desire to table the item to allow Staff to get more information as to what is really required for rural septic systems. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by McMullen, to so move. Motion carried 'unanimously. This will be back on the Planning and Zoning Commission / agenda of January 12, 1993. (-;tx VARIANCE: DECK ENCROACHING INTO REQUIRED SIDEYARD SETBACK - 14471 lJ BLUEBIRD STREET NW, BUILDERS PLUS, INC. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the request of Builders Plus, Inc., to allow for the future construction of a stairway and deck encroaching into the required IS-foot sideyard setback from an interior lot line at 14471 Bluebird Street NW. The reason for the variance would be because of the large setback requirement from Andover Boulevard. The house is constructed but not yet occupied. The stairway and deck would encroach within six feet of the side interior property line. The stairway and deck would face a garage which is on the parcel to the south. A variance was granted in a similar situation a short time ago; however, last fall the ordinance was changed to require a IS-foot sideyard setback if the house plan calls for a future deck facing the sideyard lot line, which should eliminate this problem in the future. This house was constructed prior to the IS-foot sideyard setback requirement. The developer is trying to resolve the problem prior to selling the house. MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Jovanovich, the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the variance request by Builders Plus, Inc., to construct a 4' x 10' landing and '\ stair encroaching into the required 15-foot sideyard setback, reducing ) it to 6 feet; that the hardship demonstrated is one of without the variance the property owner is denied reasonable use of the property; and that this variance is only for the landing and stair and would not apply to any other sideyard encroachment. DISCUSSION: Andover Planning and zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - December 22, 1992 .. Page 4 (Variance: Deck Encroaching into Sideyard Setback, 14471 Bluebird Street, Continued) Commissioner McMullen stated the reason for the other variances is people bought the houses with the understanding that they could build decks. In this case, the house is not yet sold; and he felt the builder has an obligation to construct the house according to the ordinance requirements. Though he didn't know the layout of the house, his first choice would be to require the builder to move the sliding glass doors to the back of the house so the stairs would not have to be built along the side of the house. Mr. Carlberg stated with the change in the ordinance, this will not be a problem in the future. This was not looked at by the Building Department when this house was built; they are looking at it in plats now. He commended the builder for wanting to resolve the problem rather than leaving it for the new homeowner to deal with. Chairperson Dehn felt the problem can be resolved before the house is sold; Commissioner Peek didn't feel that is reasonable. VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Apel, Jovanovich, Peek; NO-Dehn, Jonak, McMullen, Pease. Motion failed. The item will be placed on the January 19, 1993, City Council agenda. .. There being no other business, Chairperson Dehn declared the meeting / adjourned at 8:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, \,:~~L Recording Secretary .... '\ j CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE December 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT 6. Variance - Construct Sta rs 14471 Bluebird Street NW Builders Plus, Inc. Planning ~ APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: David L. Carlberg City Planner BY: REQUEST The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the request of Builders Plus, Inc. to allow for the future construction and placement of a stairway (deck) encroaching into the required fifteen (15') foot sideyard setback from an interior lot line as required by Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 on the property located at 14471 Bluebird Street NW. The property is zoned R-4, Single Family Urban and is legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Old Colony Estates. APPLICABLE ORDINANCES Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02, establishes the m~n~mum lot ~ requirements for an R-4, Single Family Urban zoned lot. I Section 6.02 requires a ten (10') foot sideyard setback from the interior property line unless the structure is a residential . garage or carport over twenty (20') feet wide. A six (6') foot sideyard is then permitted on the side of the garage. Section 6.02 also requires that an additional five (5') feet be added to the setback when the plans for the principle structure accommodate an access for a deck. (8YYY 9-15-92) Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04, establishes the variance procedure and process. Variances may be granted where there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in any way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. The hardships or difficulties must have to do with the characteristics of the land and not the property owner. BACKGROUND & REVIEW The applicant is requesting the variance to allow the future homeowner to construct a stairway (deck) that will encroach within six (6') feet of the side interior property line. The applicant believes a hardship exists due to the location of Andover Boulevard NW. Attached is the variance request form indicating the specific hardship stated by the applicant. j Page Two Variance - stairway(deck) , 14471 Bluebird street NW / Builders Plus, Inc. December 22, 1992 COMMISSION OPTIONS A. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval of the variance requested by Home Builders Plus, Inc. to allow the future homeowner to construct a stairway (deck) encroaching nine (9') feet into the required fifteen (15') sideyard setback from the interior property line on the property located at 14471 Bluebird street NW, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Old Colony Estates. The Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the conditions established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04. B. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend denial of the variance requested by Home Builders Plus, Inc. to allow the future homeowner to construct a stairway (deck) encroaching nine (9') feet into the required fifteen (15') foot sideyard setback from the interior property line on the property located at 14471 Bluebird street NW, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Old Colony Estates. / The Commission finds that the proposal does not meet the requirements set forth in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04. The Commission finds that no hardship exists due to the unique shape or topography of the parcel and that the land owner would not be precluded reasonable use of the property. , C. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item. '\ / ", j ,.'r~~""'."": " 4 . . .... . /,\, ~. CITY of ANDOVER VARIANCE REQUEST FORM Property Address /Ll"-l"1/ Ru.N BIRt:) ~ I Legal Description of Property: (Fill in whichever is appropriate): Lot Block Addition D \~ C~~~ E"~-b~ Plat Parcel PIN (If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Description of Request Tni~ J {f1 -/-0 t" trL j 'Z-f> -Pa i-~n .p-. I?"'- \-\ 0 ~e oa.. (- #..:J 6k. ( ,'tJP. hUt? of. dooR. ~C\.t".L 1J~e.k, -AW A,,/h~ oft. -Rtf,'a doof'. ThiS w=.lJ. Be- 5b..\I~ *u {(~-e~ (g f:+ nON' ~6 .L:a :~e. 0 IV \~ s; J -<? $a {. Bo.c \:: " {J~ +- %~i'e 6QCO"Cl.,L (').c+~e.. CacJ. ~.J~ Rca.J Eas+~,Qi<-w~. ~.- s 5i z.~ kOff"lP ~~ 1A)~~ .Q tclU ~\S ~_ (u~-lh 4h~ IS. f'\Jo<t- t<co('('... -Co" c..N ~sc:; <:) +- ~~o deeR. . Specific Hardship Current Zoning \<.-' Section of Ordinance --------------------------------------------------------------------- . Name of Applicant _f3ui ~c\-e\?~ plus INC. , / -::)'i..FF WQ.R.N~R. Address ~rn ('n')(\J Ro..~iJs B-\vd <su..i+~ 7CJ~ Home Phone 02L.\1-'l30d.. Business Phone lRt..\-\'-{OO Signature ~ C0~ Date ct- \\-ctri... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Property Owner (Fee Owner) (If different from above) Address Hoine Phone Business Phone Signature Date \ --------------------------------------------------------------------- I 7/1;5 1.5 .JOr ~ --Cv./-aRe. ~ k 't lucQ(cl. ~ ~~t-+ Or.e:( cJ2 OJooJ ttU lk.c.ackfVc.e w;~h r!iJ. f!.'J IJ-k1~(jN'3 ~ +o.,:I-uJ~ home... OWN..2.\<... VARIANCE PAGE 2 '\ / The following information shall be submitted prior to review by the City of Andover: 1. A scaled drawing of the property and structures affected showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures within 100 feet. 2. Application Fee: Single Family g$ 75 .-~* other Requests - ~100.0 Date paid ;2-7- 9Z Receipt # 11-(g() 4- Rev. 1-07-92:d'A Res. 179-91 (11-05-91) CRITERIA FOR GRANTING A VARIANCE In gr.anting a variance, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and: ; 1. If the request is in keeping with the spirit and intent of this Ordinance. 2_ If it finds that strict enforcement of this Ordinance w:ll cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property-under consideration. 3, If it finds that denying the request does not deny reasonable use of the property. 4. Economic considerations shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of the Ordinance. / ,.~ ~:JI ~''>.. i </' I .'. 'i!I:<'f/~/'" .. "-...~, I IIV I /0;"'$1 . ll_ : '~K' Iii \ :~ ~~ iliA"'. Iii ~ ~ liT _ ~\!~:L--J-n-'t",__. L----l I ~ ~~~ I ~~. I I' ~~ i - I , ,,"".,il.... I /~ '~I : ':h ,=:.. ,: :rii.:..,;' u, , II I P-i ~: ~ :~ ~,; n( --, ! i ~. :>-'''''.HI~Z",IJi I!: I "" "'''' . I - 'f "> ,:"".., '['1.' '/'/ />~ ,.~ .' )-_0.':::;. I!L~I'I I ,.,/ . I ~ I.. ~- 1#2# 1.\ 1 [. f' ~ : t:t:;::/.;.:,~.:..,~~,.~,.; i I:.".:, ,1-:,'_' . : ~ 1 'J:: ' 'i~ ~~: ~:" F ' i if-7- BARNE<;II ROl.bilN , : :~YERJf! eN ;! ,~,,:~:.... ;;~;;-:_', " : I I~ f:dAK.L~'.4w~tif4 . : !8S~A~e-:7 ' l.I:~I~'~:~i~~! !. ~ -~I; r ' ~~I-:i~ r~ . 1 '.' --. --~g I ~~ III !~'. "," '" l..-y 0 I :' '-~' , t I ,~~~';;,:j]~ ~ '1' 'Ini...J' ~' ] ~I.~ ,'" -I' ,/ ','I. . l~ I I r I E$7.~ ) ;I'.~" / 'J I ": ,L;: ~ " ! II .. "'"I ~):, " -L .: "! . I, '!I' 1 . ~\'''''':, .. '.:i~~~- 'lr"II' ,~ ~.~~.. I~ 11:1 t -, U1i ~ <~ 1>.. I "...~ I'~I ""'; '~~".,,,,:.. ~I ___ ~ ,.~ il :i ' i= ~ ~., - ~i_.7.0...:' I" ~ ~ ~"~~~~ ~'< -- (WI ~-- ~- -- : 1,[ ~,'~ .4..: ',~,:.,:;GI':t I ~ ....... "'I":.~~Y I 11/ ;(../.'l-' "'-;' ,,' ,. ';'iii'i.Lir.r,,!!~. ~ ~ -': W " ;''''// \ '\. " '." '.."mON .,. 1 ~..cAr.f;-,~'.^rI............ I , ,I II : . 3 .... ,,;.~ -: "I"'I"".~~" - , ; ~ '''".c.{!l.', '~-~g' A" II 0.' :>-. ~. '('" -~ .i.',. 1ft; ~~,. ..,' i ,,~ ; /1 , ""'~:'" ~:;.":.y, ..: :~","'; i I: R::' "~'~'~;'~"":::-~-7;i: ,"'," II : . ",,"_"S.. 'J." . '. ".' '. i:);;'. ,= x' I' (Y.f0 ~.,. .' ""I~lf,~ I ' : -=~c . II 1 'lI."".o/~ y~.. I'" Q... . ill l'q",'..r - "t,. ~J.;..,...~., : .; I ~;S ~3'/I~TJ:t~ ..,';h~' ~. II... I. t 'H ';",,,,,~..; ; " .::: : ! :. '..'" 801~.'''' ''''''''/< i I I f1 -. ~.,., ~.. ..- - - i - T'#'" 'i,I...."+~;:"N ~.":~_I ,- I ~\ J " :it-'f}t-AD-;'~ ~r(' " :1 BUN. . "i3o<>lol", I ~".I..t~~~ LP .", i '. I i i ~. \..,...... ,,,,, 11: . l~i..l:t.:.~~ ~ '~I ',. t"1 .- '%'I.. I' I " RE:'^'J>;, ;,: . '.... . ' ,-,- .." ' I 1 Oil'" . ';1:1 I' .b....... I ~ ..J I . .;.. I' ''''',''1,...,. .. i ,..f\' , J. ....". '.'" . .'.""'<I'n.", I I---}-';""A--....:.::;.'".............'. '"!I1'I._ - -..!. . ' I , MANO' ..... " ~;':i~ : v.~! ~ ---""" I ~:::'lo : ~: ;;~:",::~ ~~ : : 1.;~r!~::-',!.;...:~...,..":~.~.!I~:;.:..:,~:~2'/: i ..-0:. ~.~. .." ~~.'"~' . . i-. '!'!'- 'I'" J!~-:l t"'~~.1 I r-- I <1-.....,. ~,. -. ~.;~~I AOD -:-_ \;" :/ / \ I.,' , /,f:i,I~".iol.I."'." -"~,,, 'f'\ "J! " " ~,B: I U Ilf -c= ',.':";""",:.00": ..c' 'I" .........: BUNKER; --- ~.ANiJ9' " _,' .,' ,:" ..~ LAKE/' '_.'.' 'f' I .,l." I',! ~,., I"'-~. ~- .~c~~~~ JAL I+- , W" T'S' . , "" .. '.."- "'~'Y":~'J,'J'...;"; I ~I; I I ~. \:--.~, ~~; , ,-/,-. j " \ ,- ...." ~"~;:,~.,;~,,'ARK IU,.,-J 'GARI'';'ENf. 1 >i;. . J t. '\ I ""':=-~" I~~~F~ u . Ii ..i.. ~ --jl-r--- 71 ~:.' . i.~~,,~g~~I~1-' 'AC II~ES',; I I! /'"." ,I:/II{BUNKE' \,:" HIL :i ~'I.,::"'P.IP.=l!~\~~I(<NDO~ER ~OlWA!!.Y ",JIH'_""" I _~ ,~ ~ --...rf'If+i;:. i ,t. ~.. I '" Q~r ~ ~__.. ~-............. .. ~........, _~._,...~.. ~..w..,.. MOo' Ir--;-~~ i ".......:~ :..--.: .L':::', ::'~-:V;.'M'.~ :...;~.).~-----.- '-NiGHTINGALE I -;''iii:iNJAiJDifjON'';1 I~ _ ESTErs I NIGHTINGALE I ~ I I J -i: 1 . I' ES~TES, I ell ., RD. '___ ~ I . ~I~;. Uu ~ y':"....-.-." '. I , I I , ! / / ." -. -'J'NrJC]; J/. " '- \ / :Jim 2(!/,o & c:ftHodatu, !fno. SURVEY FOR: Me, J.ff W.~nee DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1. OLD COLONY ESTATI;S, CiLy ur Allllov(!l". Auol\C1 Counly, Minnesota. _on'IIOt\IAL LAND IU_I(VO", AHO '-"'NO C'>c........O........T CONSUl. T....T. 13621 V'N~WOOO !..ANl!: o Denotes Iron Monument x Denotes S~ike Set for Bldl. Control xxx x . x Dcnotp.s Exis tine. Grouno El cva t i ow.. [xxx.x] Uellotes rrovo~ed Fillal Grades. B.M. S~nitart sewer marlhole as showI' Ilelow. PROPOSED TOP FOUNDATION ELEVATION 139'10 --;;~POS~ GARA~E F~OOR ELEVATION JV)3, (, - ~~P~SED LOWER,FLOOR ELEV, Lr90,S~~--- fl't.'\\!l',:::' :':":":':T,-t:~~~\\:J;f.Y .). '.: 1:' . I ~ ....j ", ? "'.' 'I'~'~~~~~.~ CO (~12) 421,9126 ,./...'-00''''; _ J..f' '" '" - / II ~ . j~ !: '. f . ;. li~.,!I..-I,r,l U' '. ';',"! \':ll!l : II'Pwlf.:1 c./( ~~" "" co) -::."'~ L1 ~', t', .\. Iv i.' ..,.vf fI'"'' .~ . " III /.1 I , , O;,~." ~"" eo) iY o ~ o o ~ '1 ) ~ / \'J<l> , I ~~I ,1'1. .......... 9 t'1 8~,1 8'lO' ; ~ ~ I Iii '" zo 7 / ~ ~ '" . to.. ............"'- -t-, \ I / \ - J Y .; I N ',- I ZI,t.1 )1/.~ ~ r~ If',:J.Y) .'" , \ \ , 0/ \ j () - I , '.... ~ ) ,/. EfZ. 8f.. 5<f-"3" I<!. eO <f-.I'! lc.\..Ja a~,a"" I' . ____ s~*...:.:.:"'''''L.~G... c...~\) ., 0.': .50 ~8'l.'O ~ -=-----=:::-:::.=.. T. sn . 8' 1= e'-4-,.S ~Il, ! :-,'. 6LUE:Blf<,O STRE.ET -y-' -,-- L I 0 r~ - , hcrehy cQrtify that this 5UCVCY - __..__ was prel'aced hy me or_ under my diloect SIlIH~l'Vl~dull-:;;;d tha.t I" am i\ dull Het.isterecl 1'['or(!:i~.ioHaL L<J1lt1 SUl"V(!yor ulldt!r thl! law:. of t1w :ta~to of Millllll"ota'~h'" I'lth day ", ~l.,,"'h, 1')?~, Y ~. _____. ~1inll{!~wta l,il:P'IISC No. ~:!267 " . ~,' ~HJ'" O.VTO~ .....,.,.SSlZ' "1<), 't '))1' .0 '" ~ /AI ~:?: ;: oJ ,9 -: (b I IV '" 0 ... '" 0';' ;....A ' ,'3 -.!l 1\ .' , " ; ( J~ ," ~ , :;c ~u~' ... . . ~' , - . ~ \j g,..+ '" -.9 I) r\. N\ e.,'" "'1.- g,.' <\' 7"" ., '-" N,W, CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION J AGENDA SECTION :' NO. Discussion Items DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT '~ Planning .~ David L. Carlberg City Planner January 19, 1993 ITEM Riverdale Church NO~ 1657 161st Avenue NW BY: REQUEST The City Council is asked to renew the Special Use Permit granted to the Riverdale Church on November 5, 1991 which permitted the church to construct a church at the following described property: 1657 161st Avenue NW (PIN 15-32-24-14-0001). Attached is the resolution approved by the City Council on November 5, 1991. Note that condition No.1 requires renewal of~ the Special Use Permit by the City Council. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA , RES. NO. R 153-91 ) A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF THE RIVERDALE CHURCH TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CHURCH TO BE LOCATED AT 1657 161ST AVENUE NW (PIN 15-32-24-14-0001), LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: ' UNPLATTED GROW TOWNSHIP SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, EXCEPT EASEMENTS OF RECORD. WHEREAS, The Riverda1e Church has requested a Special Use Permit to allow for the construction of a church located at 1657 161st Avenue NW (PIN 15-32-24-14-0001); and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance 8, Sections 5.03 and 7.03; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands; and , j WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no opposition regarding said request; and WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission to allow the Riverdale Church to construct a church on said property with the following conditions: 1. The Special Use Permit will be subject to a sunset clause as defined in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(D) unless a renewal is granted by the City Council. 2. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual review and site inspection by City Staff. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 5th day of Novembe~,1991 ATTEST: ~ta V~ctor~a Volk, City Clerk (9' ~. ~" .~ \\ &0 ;', f: I;' , ~ if ,~ ~,,~..-( )i' ""-"-..'<" ----~-- ---~------ -----.~--- ----. - CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE January 19, 1993 AGENDA af~~\9~ion ORIGINATING DEPARTMEN~ APPROVED FOR AGENDA NO, Planning ITEM Compo Plan/ Met David L. Carlberg NO, ..s: Council Discussion BY: City Planner BY: This item has been placed on the agenda to inform the Council of the current status of the Andover Comprehensive Plan. The Council was last briefed on the status of the Comprehensive Plan at the December 1, 1992 Council meeting (attached). The following is a chronological report of the events that have taken place since the December 1, 1992 Council meeting. Metropolitan and Community Development Committee Meeting November jU, 1992 On November 30, 1992, staff received the Metro Meetings, a weekly calendar of the meetings and agenda items for the Metropolitan Council, its advisory and standing committees and various commissions. Under the Metropolitan and Community Development Committee (MCDC) the City of Andover'S Comprehensive Plan was scheduled. Staff, upon attending the meeting, found the item on the Andover Comprehensive Plan had been removed. An error had been made on the part of Met Council Staff . Staff Meeting with Met Council Staff December 10, 1992 On December 10, 1992, City Staff and Met Council Staff met to discuss the report that was to be presented to the MCDC on December 14, 1992. Attached is the initial Met Council staff report dated December 8, 1992. Council should note page five ( 5 ) under No. 2(a-d) of the recommendations. These four items are what Met Council Staff was recommending that the City must do to receive Met Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan. As a result of the meeting these four recommendations by Met Council Staff changed. The revised report, dated December 14, 1992, that COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY SECOND BY TO , J Page Two Discussion - Comprehensive Plan City Council Meeting January 19, 1993 was presented to the MCDC has been attached for Council review. Note that two of the items were removed. Staff had also requested that the City at least receive 60 acres of Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) expansion to finish projects that the City had investments in. Staff requested 40 acres in Pinewood Estates and 20 acres in Weybridge be included in the MUSA in the interim of the completion of the transportation study. Met Council Staff agreed with the City's request. Meetin \ ) On December 14, 1992, the Andover Comprehensive Plan went before the MCDC. Please note that Met Council Staff had changed their recommendation from the City withdrawing all MUSA expansion requests to the City withdrawing all MUSA expansion requests with the exce tion of 60 acres in Pinewood Estates and in the We brid e Pat. T e C~ty a requeste t at t e acre MUSA expans~on e granted based on the investment the City had in those named subdivisions. Staff, an hour prior to the meeting, requested an additional 40 acres be included for the Winslow Hills Plat to also cover the City's investment in the project. Met Council Staff recommended at the meeting 80 acres of MUSA expansion be allowed. City Staff requested during the meeting that the MCDC grant the City 100 acres of MUSA instead of the 80 acres. The recommendation made by the MCDC to the Met. Council is attached for Council review. Note that the three subdivisions indicated above have been included in the recommendation of Staff and also the MCDC. Again, City Staff's rationale for choosing those named subdivisions was to insure the City covered what investments we had in the projects. Metropolitan Council Meeting December 17, 1992 At the December 17, 1992 Met Council meeting, the Council approved the following recommendations from the MCDC and the resolution included with the December 17, 1992 report (attached). The City, in order to put the Comprehensive Plan Amendment into effect, must adhere to No. 2(a-b) located on the second page of the report dated December 17, 1992. , ) The City, since the December 17, 1992 meeting, has been contacted by a developer who disagrees with City Staff's choice of the developments who should receive the 100 acre MUSA. The developer will be present at the meeting to discuss this with the Council. Staff has informed the developer, as it has the Council in this report, that the three subdivisions were chosen because of the investment the City has made in those subdivisions. The Council may agree or disagree with Staff's decision. The Council should also decide if the Council agrees with the decision of the Met Council. Please note that the City can still develop 2.5 acre lots outside the MUSA. , 'I I. J CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Compo Plan/ Metro. Council Discussion DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT.~ Planning ~ David L. Carlberg BY: City planner December 1, 1992 ITEM NO, .3. AGENDA diffc!bmion NO. / This item has been placed on the agenda to inform the Council of the current status of the Andover Comprehensive plan. As the Council is aware, the City submitted the Comprehensive plan in December of 1991. The Plan has been with Metropolitan Council Staff for nearly a year now. The City in this time period has made revisions to the Plan and has submitted information promptly upon the request of Met. Council Staff. Requests and changes to date include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Adoption of management standards for the protection of wetlands and area surface water quality. The Council should remember the resolution passed at the June 2, 1992 meeting which adopts these standards even though Met. Council does not require this in any of their policies. 2. Conducted a transportation study of the Highway 10 corridor, evaluating the effect and impact of the future growth of Andover on Highway 10. The City in the study was asked to show alternative routes of traffic when Highway 10 reaches its capacity. The City's consulting engineer, TKDA, prepared the study. The cost of the project to the City was $2,500. 3. The City, as requested by Met. Council, has prepared a section by section analysis of the number of lots of record to indicate Andover's rural density. This is a part of the 4 for 40 issue. 4. The City has granted a time extension of 10 days due to Met. Council Staff scheduling problems. The plan is to be before the Metropolitan Community Development Committee (MCDC) on November 30, 1992 and Met. Council on December 17, 1992. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY '\ J TO SECOND BY Page Two , Compo Plan - Met. Council Discussion ) City Council Meeting December 1, 1992 5. Met. Council Staff on November 23, 1992 requested a 30 day extension to the now 100 day review period. The request is based on findings by Met. Council on a recent 44 acre MUSA expansion request by the City of Ramsey. As part of the recommendation of the Metropolitan Community Development Committee (MCDC), a corridor study on Highway 10 was mandated. Attached is a letter from Ryan Scroeder, City Administrator giving greater detail. A meeting has been scheduled for December 9, 1992 at the Blaine City Hall to discuss the transportation issue(s). Met. Council Long Range Planning Department Staff believes that the City will not receive any future MUSA expansion at this time. But, if the City grants a 30 day extension, the first meeting of the communities under Met. Council jurisdiction having an impact on Highway 10 will have met and this may allow the City to receive some MUSA expansion based on having one meeting of the communities under our belt. City Staff in discussing our options believes that the 30 day extension should be denied and let the Plan appear before the necessary committees and air our differences, and also give the City the opportunity to show how the City has bent over backwards to accommodate all Met. Council requests to date. , / \ ~.) OLe, City of Ramsey 15153 NOWTHEN BOULEVARD N.W., RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 . (612) 427,1410 .' R". E C El'V t~- , I "iO, 1 8 1992 D ,- November 17,1992 James SchrantzL City Administrator City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Dear Mr. Schranz: CITY OF ANDOVER On Monday, November 9, 1992 the City of Ramsey met with the Metropolitan Council Community Development Committee to review a request from the City of Ramsey for a 44 acre MUSA expansion. At the Committee meeting there was a recommendation for approval which now goes to the full Council on Thursday, November 19, 1992. As part of the recommendation from the Community Development Committee there were a few policy statements related to transportation. Within the staff report ratified by the Committee was the statement that it was mandated that there be a corridor study on Highway #10. It was stated that this study is to include Hennepin and Anoka Counties as well as all corridor communities. Further, that additional comprehensive plan amendments are contingent upon an implementation schedule of study recommendations. ,/ Given the above, the City of Ramsey has requested that the Metropolitan Council facilitate and participate in such a study. Further, that it include a broader brush of transportation issues beyond Highway #10. At this point, the City of Ramsey will be requesting that the Metropolitan Council Long Range Planning Department provide for the mechanism to pull all of the pertinent bodies together to discuss the issue. We look fornrard to your interest and cooperation. Sincerely, ~YOF Ryan R. Schroeder City Administrator RRS:ccr cc: Ramsey City Council Steven Jankowski, Ramsey City Engineer Ken Kunzman Lyle Schwartkopf Barb Senness CarlOhrn Steve Schwanke .' ~ , ) Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area Mears Park Centre, 230 E. 5th St. St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612-291-6359/IDD 291-0904 DATE: December 8, 1992 TO: Metropolitan and Community Development Committee FROM: Richard Thompson, Research and Long Range Planning SUBJECT: City of Andover Comprehensive Plan Amendment Overall Plan Revision Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 14206-5 Metropolitan Council District No.9 INTRODUCTION The city of Andover has developed a comprehensive plan that provides for orderly development and management of land uses within the city. The plan contains an inventory of background information necessary for the city to make decisions regarding future land use and phasing. Elements of this plan include goals, a utilities plan, analysis of housing and residential, commercial, industrial land uses and parks, recreation and open space. The plan also reviews transportation and aviation and provides an implementation program. For each of these elements, the city evaluated its current status and developed a set of goals and policies. The time frame of the plan is twenty-years to the year 2010. REGIONAL POLICY ISSUES Several regional policy issues are associated with this plan amendment. These issues relate to satisfaction of criteria in the appendix to the rural service area guidelines of the MDIF and expansion of the MUSA as it relates to the impact of the planned land uses on a metropolitan highway system. The city of Andover continues to adhere to a rural area density policy of four units per 10 acres (2 l/2-acre minimum lot size), which is inconsistent with the Council's rural area density policy (Policy 18 of the MDIF). As part of this plan amendment, the city prepared an analysis which demonstrates that the city has existing development patterns that are inconsistent with the Council's rural area policy. The city has addressed all of the criteria in the appendix to the rural service area guidelines except criteria 7, 10 and 11. It has not completely addressed number 7, which calls for "the amount and location of wetlands, with information demonstrating how such areas will be protected from development." The city has, however, adopted a resolution adopting the recommendation of the Metropolitan Council to incorporate management standards for the 1 protection of wetlands and area surface water quality into the Andover Comprehensive Plan and Official Controls. The city will also need to respond to Criteria 10, which states that "additional information that may be necessary to bring the local comprehensive plan into compliance with metropolitan system plans." The city must address impacts of its proposed MUSA expansions on TII 10. The city must also address Criteria 11, which calls for a schedule for implementing the plan amendment. / '\ I The city of Andover has policies related to private wastewater treatment plants, industrial development in the rural area and inspections which are inconsistent with the Council's Wastewater Treatment and Handline: Poliey Plan. The staff recommends that the city modify its plan and city ordinances to exclude any further use of private wastewater treatment plants consistent with policy 1-12 of the Wastewater Treatment and Handline: Poliey Plan. The city allows industrial uses in the rural area that are not consistent with the Council's policy for the General Rural Use Area. The staff recommends that the city modify its plan to assure that its industrial uses area consistent with Council policies. The city of Andover is requesting an expansion of the MUSA In the Council's review of the Andover plan amendment, the staff requested the city to re-evaluate the impacts of forecasted development on TII 10. The city forecasted traffic on TII 10 given anticipated land development in the city by the year 2010. The analysis indicated that a significant increase in traffic would occur on TII 10. The capacity of TII 10 would likely be exceeded should the forecasted development take place. Policy 12 D of the Council's Transoortation Poliey Plan states that the Council will approve expansion of the urban service area, including the urban service area of the freestanding growth centers, only when the state and/or appropriate local unit of government demonstrate that adequate highway improvements will be provided when needed to avoid exceeding the capacity of the affected metropolitan highway. / " Since the city of Andover contributes many commuters to TII 10, it is critical that all the additional affected communities (Anoka, Champlin, Dayton, Blaine, Coon Rapids) as well as Anoka and Hennepin Counties, MnDOT and the metropolitan Council meet to consider a transportation study before the demand far outpaces the capacity of the roadways. AUTHORITY TO REVIEW The Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act of 1976 requires local units of government to submit comprehensive plan amendments to the Metropolitan Council for review (Minn. Stat. 473.864, subd. 2, 1978). The Act also gives the Council authority to establish guidelines governing the amendment review process (Minn. Stat. 473.854). The city of Andover submitted its proposed comprehensive plan amendment on December 17, 1991. On January 2, 1992, the Chair sent a letter to the city informing it that the plan as submitted was incomplete. The city since submitted additional information so that on September 14, 1992, the Chair sent a letter to the city indicating the plan amendment was complete. The 90- day review period ends on December 7, 1992. The city has sent a letter requesting an extension to December 17, 1992. '. 2 ) Documents submitted in support ofthis plan include: 1. Andover Comprehensive Plan (December 19, 1991). 2. Resolution Adopting the Recommendation of the Metropolitan Council to Incorporate Management Standards for the Protection of Wetlands and Area Surface Water Quality into the Andover Comprehensive Plan and Official Controls and Incorporate them in the city's Local Stormwater Management (June 4, 1992) 3. Letter to Richard Thompson from David Carlberg dated September 4, 1992, including map and land use calculations for rural density exception. 4. Letter to Richard Thompson from David Carlberg dated September 16, 1992, regarding updated phasing of the urban expansion of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. 5. Wetlands Map for the city of Andover, November 23, 1992. FINDINGS 1. The Andover Comprehensive Plan forecasts 7,585 households in the city in 2000 which - are inconsistent with Council forecasts of 7,150 for the same year. 2. The city needs to fully satisfy exception criteria 7, 10 and 11 in the appendix to the rural service area guidelines. The Council cannot approve an exception to the rural area policy, until the city responds to all of the criteria in the appendix to the MDIF rural area service area policy guidelines. I 3. The Andover Comprehensive Plan shows only 905 jobs in the city in 1990, whereas the Metropolitan Council shows 2,278 jobs in the city in 1990. The Council forecasts moderate growth in employment to 3,150 in 2000. 4. The supply of developable land within the MUSA in Andover in 1992 is 402 acres. Based on Interim Council forecasts, the Council anticipates a demand with overage of 1,711 acres in the city in 2000. The city can justify adding 1,309 acres to the MUS A based on land demand and supply. 5. Sufficient capacity exists in both the Coon Rapids interceptor and Metropolitan WWTP to accommodate sanitary sewer flow from all of the city's growth as projected in this amendment through the planning period ending in 2010. 6. In March of 1992, the city submitted a formal request to the MWCC for provision of metropolitan sanitary sewer service to the western portion of the city through the CAB interceptor. 7. This amendment indicates that service through the CAB interceptor would be needed to accommodate development planned to occur during the 2000-2005 planning period, but , 3 segments of the CAB interceptor have not been constructed to enable metropolitan service through it to the city of Andover. '\ ) 8. The demonstrated level of need in this amendment for metropolitan sanitary sewer service to Andover's CAB interceptor service area is inadequate to warrant the MWCC's proceeding. with the necessary planning and construction of the CAB interceptor extension at this time. Presently, neither the Council's Wastewater Treatment and Handling Policy Plan nor the MWCC's implementation plan recommend the construction of the CAB extension during the period to 2010. 9. The city states that there are no existing or proposed municipal wastewater treatment plants within the city, but it does not have specific policies and ordinances in place to prevent or restrict their future siting within the city. 10. Over 2,600 on-site septic tank systems are in operation within the city providing sanitary sewer service to individual residences in the rural service area. The city relies on individual property owners to perform biennial inspections. Council staff is concerned about reliance on self-inspections by citizens for solids removal and system integrity. 11. The city adopted a resolution on June 2, 1992, indicating it will adopt National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) design standards or their equivalent for new stormwater ponds and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's urban best management practices titled Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas or their equivalent standards for use in managing stormwater runoff from all future development within the city, consistent with the Council's Interim Metro-wide Nonpoint Source Pollution Implementation Strategy. / , 12. The plan indicates that peak hour congestion exists along Round Lake, Hanson and Bunker Lake Boulevards and Seventh Avenue N.W. This congestion occurs within the community on Bunker Lake Boulevard and outside the community at the intersection of Round Lake Boulevard and TII 10 and Hanson Boulevard and TII 10. Increased development as proposed in the plan will increase this congestion. / 13. A deficiency of east-west corridors creates inefficient travel across the city and inefficient access to Highway 65, which lies east of the city limits in the city of Ham Lake. 14. A lack of public transit within the community requires that commuters use a more personalized mode of transportation such as the automobile. 15. Andover has no principal arterials within the city. TII 10 which serves the city of Andover is a1ready experiencing some congestion problems. TII 65 also serves the city. Policy 12 D of the Council's Transoortation Policy Plan states that the Council will approve expansion of the MUSA only when the state or appropriate local unit of government demonstrates that adequate highway improvements will be provided when needed to avoid exceeding the capacity of the affected metropolitan highway. 16. City forecasted traffic on TII 10 as a result of anticipated land development in the city by the year 2010 found that a significant increase in traffic would occur on TII 10. The capacity of TII 10 would be exceeded should the forecasted development take place. . , 4 / I / 17. It is critical that all affected communities, Anoka and Hennepin Counties and MnlDOT and the Metropolitan Council meet to consider a transportation study before demand far outpaces the capacity of the roadways. 18. The city recreation element is consistent with the Council's Recreation Open Space Development GuidelPolicy Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS That the Metropolitan Council: 1. Adopt the above findings and the staff report as part of these recommendations. 2. Inform the city of Andover that pursuant to the Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minnesota Statutes Sec. 473.175, Subd. 1), before it can put the plan amendment into effect it must: a. withdraw all MUSA expansion requests in the plan until a comprehensive traffic analysis that evaluates the potential impact the planned land uses will have on TH 10 is completed and all parties have agreed to an implementation schedule. b. modify its plan and city ordinances to specifically exclude any further use ~f private wastewater treatment plants within the city. / c. modify its plan to restrict industrial development in the rural service area to those land uses that are consistent with the Council's policy for the General Rural Use Area, consistent with policies 1-10A and 1-10B of the Wastewater Treatment and Handlin!! Policy Plan, and that generate only domestic-strength wastewater. d. modify its plan to reinstate its (dropped) on-site sewage system ordinance requirement of solids removal from all systems "not less than once every four (4) years" (or more frequently), and that the city revise its ordinance to specify that all on-site systems are to be inspected at least biennially by an inspector licensed and certified by the MPCA 3. Recommend that the city of Andover participate in a joint city/county comprehensive traffic analysis that evaluates the potential impact planned land uses will have on TH 10. Land use strategies should be developed in conjunction with highway system management strategies to ensure that locally generated traffic does not exceed the metropolitan highway system capacity. 4. Recommend that the city amend and submit its comprehensive sanitary sewer plan to include the following: Design criteria for the temporary flow diversion facility, to include its average daily and peak hydraulic capacities, the municipal sanitary sewer system capacity limitations within , , / 5 which it must operate, its expected design life, and its capability of also providing service ( '\ to the other areas within the city's CAB interceptor service area that are planned for / development during the 2000-2005 planning period. / " 6 r ) " SUPPORTING ANALYSIS / Description or the Plan Amendment The city of Andover Comprehensive Land Use Plan is a complete revision of the city's 1980 Land Use Plan adopted in 1982. The purpose of the city of Andover's revised Comprehensive Land Use Plan is to manage the land use components associated with the growth anticipated in the city. This comprehensive plan is intended to control or influence the type, rate, amount or geographic pattern of land use within the city's jurisdiction. The underlying reason for Andover's comprehensive plan is to control the cost of providing public seIVices, to foster a lifestyle and to preserve the physical environment. The goal of the city's plan is to guide an orderly and economically efficient development of land within the city. As part of this plan, the city has incorporated a series of goal statements that address issues raised in the planning process. These goals address community identity, the city's rural setting, environmental protection, economic balance, controlled growth, housing opportunity, parks, recreation and open space, transportation, industry and commerce and community facilities. The plan proposes a staging plan for MUSA expansions in five year increments from 1990-1995, from 1995 to 2000, from 2000 to 2005 and from 2005 to 2010. The five-year phasing increments assume an expansion rate of approximately 225 sewered units per year. Thus, the plan proposes the following additional growth to the sewer system: / 1991--1995 1996--2000 2000--2005 1,051 lots 1,125 lots 1,125 lots The objectives of this plan are to allow for in fill of the existing MUSA and to encourage orderly expansion of development into the Future Urban SeIVice Area. The planning horizon is 20 years, and it is prudent for the community to plan for this time frame. However, the Council can only consider MUSA expansions to the year 2000, since that is the planning horizon of the current Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework (MDIF). Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework The city of Andover is located in central Anoka County. It is surrounded by Ramsey on the west, Oak Grove Township on the north, Ham Lake on the east, and Coon Rapids and Anoka on the south and southwest (see Attachment 1). Andover's -surface topography is generally flat or gently rolling. The city is characterized by a high water table, and shallow lakes, bays and swamps occupy many low depressed areas where the water table is at or near the surface or where ground water is exposed. Surface water drainage generally follows either the Rum River or Coon Creek which eventually empty into the Mississippi River. The natural drainage system has been augmented by a county ditch network and privately owned ditches. , , / The city of Andover was incorporated in November 1974 from Grow Township. As a result of incorporation, the city acquired all the land on the east side of the Rum River from the city of 7 Ramsey and in turn transferred all the land on the west side of the Rum River to the city of Ramsey. ,-" J The city is primarily residential in nature with limited commercial development in a few areas in the south central part of the city. The city has no freeways running through it, although it is served by trunk highways 10, 169 and 65. Bunker Hills Regional Park is located in the southeastern part of the city. The population of the city has grown rapidly in the last decade, from 9,387 in 1980 to 15,216 in 1990. This number exceeded Council forecasts for the city by 2,216 people. The number of households grew by 1,961 during this same period, which exceeded Council forecasts by 630. The city estimates that about 75 percent of this recent growth has come within the urban service area. ANALYSIS Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework (MDIF) Forecasts (Michael Munson) Andover's comprehensive plan amendment presents population forecasts that are slightly below those of the Metropolitan Council for the year 2000. The plan contains a projected average household size of 2.8 persons per household for the year 2000. This results in a forecast of 7,585 households in 2000, which is inconsistent with the Council's forecast of 7,150. The city averaged about 100 residential permits from 1980 to 1984, and about 315 per year from 1985 to 1989. Although recent building activity is down--269 permits in 1990 and 143 in the first half of 1991, / '\ this is still a fairly rapid growth rate. ) The city's forecasts indicate some increase in growth of households in the 1990's (2,282) over the 1980's (1,961). The growth in the next decade is then forecast to decline to 1,800. Given the sharp slowdown in regional growth anticipated for the 1990's and beyond, few if any cities are likely to surpass the growth they experienced in the 1980's. The only ones that have any chance of doing so are communities on the edge of development (emerging suburbs). They will continue to experience rapid growth as closer-in suburbs fill up. Whether they can actually increase the amount of growth they receive will depend on how fast the region grows. Given the volatile trends shown in regional growth over the past several decades, it does not appear to be something that can be forecast with certainty. The Twin Cities 1990 census showed nearly 84,000 more people in the region than the Council had forecast in 1985. However, the 1990 census household number was quite close. It is the household number that is of most concern because it more directly reflects the demand for land and urban service expansion needs. The comprehensive plan shows a decreasing average persons per household from 3.43 in 1990 to 2.80 in 2000. When calculated, this yields a forecast of 7,585 households, compared to the Council's forecast of 7,150. Employment estimates used by the city are quite low. The plan shows only 905 jobs in the city in 1990, whereas the Council estimates 2,278. Moreover, the Council shows moderate growth in employment in Andover to 3,150 in 2000, which is almost three times the employment forecasted in the plan. 8 " \ / , / The Council continually monitors household and job growth and it will be revising its forecasts in approximately five years, The Council also has established an Interim Forecast Process to address growth changes between forecast revisions. If Andover appears to be growing at a rate different from the Council's forecasts, it will make an appropriate adjustment. Rural Use Area Policy The MDIF identifies Andover as part of the general rural use area and as part of the developing area. The developing area is that part of the region in the path of urban growth. Council policy supports the preservation of agriculture in the general rural use area; it will also support residential development at a maximum density of one unit per 10 acres on a 640-acre basis. The city of Andover continues to adhere to a rural area density policy of four units per 10 acres (2 112 acre minimum lot size), which is inconsistent with the Council's rural area density policy (Policy 18 of the MDIF). As part of this plan amendment, the city staff prepared a section-by-section analysis which demonstrates that the city has existing development patterns that are inconsistent with the Council's rural area policy. The city has addressed all of the criteria in the appendix to the rural service area guidelines except criteria 7, 10 and 11. It has not completely addressed number seven, which calls for "the amount and location of wetlands, with information demonstrating how such areas will be protected from development." It has, however, adopted Resolution No. R-084-92: A Resolution adopting the recommendation of the Metropolitan Council to incorporate management standards for the protection of wetlands and area surface water quality into the Andover Comprehensive Plan and Official Controls and Incorporate them in the City's Local Stormwater Plan. This resolution meets the protection requirements of Criteria 7. The city will also need to respond to Criteria 10, which states that "additional information that may be necessary to bring the local comprehensive plan into compliance with metropolitan system plans." The city will need to modify its transportation plan and sewer plans to make them consistent with the Council's Wastewater Treatment and Handlin!! Poliey Plan and Transportation Policv Plan. The city must also satisfy Criteria 11, which calls for a schedule for implementing the plan amendment. The plan would allow commercial and industrial land uses in the rural area. Neighborhood commercial uses are allowed under the Council's Policies for the Rural Service Area of the MDIF, but industrial uses are limited. The city should modify its plan to assure industrial uses it allows conform to the Council's Policies for the Rural Service Area. Land Supply and Demand When local governments request an expansion of their MUSA lines, the Metropolitan Council reviews those requests based on several criteria. The local unit of government must demonstrate a regional need and there must be adequate capacity available in the metropolitan sewer and highway systems. The Council initially reassesses land supply and demand based on a comparison of figures provided by the city and current Council forecasts. If the city's land supply is below or " , I 9 approaching the five-year overage and regional facilities are adequate, the Council will agree to service the area expansion. '\, Based on information presented in the plan, the city has a total area of approximately 22,272 acres. Of this area, approximately 21,848 acres are designated for residential use according to the zoning ordinance. 'Rural large lot (R-l and R-2) designations account for approximately 18,328 acres. Urban residential (R-3, R-4, M-1 and M-2) designations account for approximately 3,520 acres. The urban residential designations lie within the existing MUSA line. This land is near full development. Based on development trends, it is expected that the current MUSA will be fully developed within five years. The rural residential areas have experienced substantial development of large lots ranging from one acre to ten acres. Most of this development has occurred in the western and northwestern parts of the city. Of the approximately 18,328 acres, the city estimates that one-third (6,100 acres) is available for development. This estimate is based on total acres less the various development constraints. The plan indicates that two parcels are designated for industrial uses. One parcel of 150 acres is located within the MUSA, the other is a 40-acre parcel located outside the MUSA The city also has four commercial land use designations. One of these, neighborhood business areas are designated for eleven parcels in the southern part of the city. Three of these areas are proposed in the rural area, one is proposed in a future MUSA expansion area. These sites average five acres in size., / Based on the analysis of Council staff, the city of Andover has 258.6 acres of developable land within the MUSA Of this land, 138.6 acres was designated residential and 120.0 acres was designated commercial. The recently approved Hay Addition added 84 residential acres and the three minor plan amendments for Weybridge, Winslow Hills and Pinewood Estates added another 60 acres to the supply. Thus, as of November, 1992, the supply of developable land within the MUSA in Andover is 402 acres. Land demand is based on household forecasts for the city of Andover. The Council forecasts 7,150 households in Andover in the year 2000. This represents an increase of 2,720 households between 1990-2000. Applying land demand factors, the demand for the city for the different land uses-will be 906 residential acres (3 units per acre), 10 commercial acres, 50 industrial acres, 5 public acres, 135 acres for streets, and 35 acres for parks. This yields a total demand of 1,141 acres whic~ with overage yields a total demand of 1,711 acres in 2000. Taking the available acres from the available supply indicates the city can justify adding 1,309 acres to the MUSA The plan breaks down the MUSA expansions into phases with phase I (1992-1995) requesting 559 gross acres and Phase II (1996-2000) requesting 492 gross acres. Phase ill would have the city requesting to add 638 acres to the MUSA after the year 2000. Since the current MDIF only uses the year 2000 planning horizon, MUSA expansions beyond that year cannot be considered. From a land supply and demand standpoint, Phase I and II expansions are justified. However, for a MUSA expansion to be placed into effect, it cannot result in a system impact on sewer or transportation systems (see following systems discussion). ,--\ , I 10 / Sewers and Surface Water (Jim Larsen) The city of Andover currently receives metropolitan sanitary sewer service only through Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) interceptor MSB 7035, also identified as the Coon Rapids interceptor. Flow into this interceptor is conveyed to the Metropolitan wastewater treatment plant (WWfP) in St. Paul for treatment and subsequent discharge to the Mississippi River. While the current municipal flow projections significantly exceed those found in the Council's Wastewater Treatment and Handling Policy Plan as shown in the table below, sufficient capacity exists in both the Coon Rapids interceptor and Metropolitan WWfP to accommodate sanitary sewer flow from all of the city's growth as projected in this amendment through the planning period ending in 2010. The capacity allotted to Andover in the Coon Rapids interceptor is approximately 770 million gallons per year. Segments of the CAB (Champlin-Anoka-Brooklyn Park) interceptor have not been constructed to enable metropolitan service through it to the city of Andover. In March of 1992, the city submitted a formal request to the MWCC for provision of metropolitan sanitary sewer service to the western portion of the city through the CAB interceptor. This amendment indicates that service through the CAB interceptor would be needed to accommodate development planned to occur during the 2000-2005 planning period. The Council has granted only one 84-acre expansion of the MUS A within Andover's CAB interceptor service area, Referral File No. 14206-3 approved in October, 1991. That amendment indicated that the city will pump all sanitary sewer flow from the 84-acre area via municipal sanitary sewer facilities into the city's Coon Creek interceptor service area until such time as service is available to the city through the CAB interceptor. The remainder of the land within the city's CAB interceptor service area is outside the MUSA in the rural service area. TOTAL SANITARY SEWER FLOW PROJECITONS (million gallons per year) I INTERCEPTOR I 1990 2000 2010 ANDOVER COON RAPIDS 180 362 538 CAB - 15 34 TOTAL 180 377 572 MET COUNCIL TOTAL · 140-173 155-199 171-225 - TOTAL.. 205 368 560 wastewater lreatment ana Hanalmg i'Ollcy i',an, 19&1 .. MWCC/Metropolitan Council 1992 Interim Forecast The demonstrated level of need in this amendment for metropolitan sanitary sewer service to Andover's CAB interceptor service area is inadequate to warrant the MWCC's proceeding with the necessary planning and construction of the CAB interceptor extension at this time. Presently, neither the Council's Wastewater Treatment and Handling Policy Plan nor the MWCC's implementation plan recommend the construction of the CAB extension during the period to 11 2010. In an effort to more adequately demonstrate the level of need, the Council recommends that the city amend and submit its comprehensive sanitary sewer plan to include Design criteria for the temporary flow diversion facility, to include its average daily and peak hydraulic capacities, the municipal sanitary sewer system capacity limitations within which it must operate, its expected design life, and its capability of also providing service to the other areas within the city's CAB interceptor service, area that are planned for development during the 2000-2005 planning period. '1 Following submission of the sewer plan by the city and its review by the Council and MWCC, the Council and the MWCC will be able to evaluate the issues of need, timing, and possible alternatives to an extension of the CAB interceptor to provide service to the western portion of the city during the current planning period ending in 2010. The city states that there are no existing or proposed private or municipal wastewater treatment plants, within the city, However, the Council approved a comprehensive plan amendment in the spring of 1992 (Referral File No. 14206-4) for the Waste Disposal Engineering Site within the city that will involve the construction of a wastewater treatment plant in the future to treat ground water extracted from a series of wells on the site. The plan also indicates that land has been zoned for commercial and industrial development within the city's rural service area. Council staff is concerned that the failure of on-site sewage disposal systems or private wastewater treatment plant that will be providing sanitary sewer service to those developments could lead to the unplanned, premature extension of municipal or metropolitan sanitary sewer service to those - locations. Policy 1-12 of the Council's Wastewater Treatment and Handlin~ Poliey Plan states that "Private wastewater treatment plants should be permitted only if they are provided for in Metropolitan Council-approved local comprehensive plans and are in full accord with the local comprehensive plan." Staff recommends that the city modify its plan and city ordinance(s) to , '\ specifically exclude any further use of private wastewater treatment plants within the city. Staff recommends that the Council require Andover to modify the plan to restrict industrial development in the rural service area to those land uses that are consistent with the Council's policy for the General Rural Use Area, consistent with policies I-lOA and I-lOB of the Wastewater Treatment and Handling Policy Plan, and that generate only domestic-strength wastewater. Policy 1-lOA states that "metropolitan sewer system facilities should serve only lands inside the metropolitan urban service area...", and 1-lOB states that "metropolitan services will not be extended to the rural service area, and any pollution problems resulting from development activity or inadequate management of existing sewer facilities must be resolved and financed by the local governments involved." City implementation of this recommendation would help to prevent the possible need for prematurely extending municipal or metropolitan sanitary sewer service into the city's rural service area. The plan indicates that there are an estimated 1,200 existing on-site septic systems within the city. Subsequent communication with city staff indicate that there are actually in excess of 2,600 on-site systems in the city. The city's on-site system ordinance does include the requirement of following the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) Chapter 7080 Rules for the design of systems in the city. While the ordinance does not specifically require the dedicated siting of two drainfields during the platting of lots, each new developable lot must contain approximately one acre of land suitable for the siting of on-site drainfields, which would typically accommodate at least one replacement drainfield site should the primary site experience failure. 12 '\ ,I ) The city allows development in its rural service area on 2Y2-acre lots. Historically, development was allowed on one-acre lots. The current extent of development is such that throughout most of the city, the average development density by section exceeds the Council's recommended maximum standard of four units per 40 acres as presented in the Council's Wastewater Treatment and Handling Policy Plan policy 1-2. While the city is to be commended for it's on-site system ordinance that has-since the mid-1970's included the requirement of post-installation inspection of all on-site sewage disposal systems in the city, the ordinance allows each property owner to make the determination of their own on-site system's integrity and need to remove accumulated solids. The city of Andover is located in an area identified regionally as the Anoka sand plain where soils have been characterized as sandy and rapidly permeable, and are known to be susceptible to possible contamination of underground supplies of water when allowed to develop through the utilization of on-site septic systems. The city has developed an extensive portion of its area utilizing on-site systems while relying on over 2,600 individual property owners for the biennial determination of each system's integrity. The Council staff is concerned about reliance on self- inspections by citizens for solids removal and system integrity. City records indicate that approximately one out of five systems had solids removed during 1991, indicating that the average system has its solids removed once each five years. The Minnesota Extension Service recommends the removal of septic tank solids by pumping every one to three years for a typical home without a garbage disposal. To avoid the unplanned, premature extension of municipal or metropolitan sanitary sewers and municipal water to areas of past development in the rural service area to resolve potential ground water contamination problems, Council staff recommends that the city reinstate its (dropped) ordinance requirement of solids removal from all systems "not less than once every four (4) years" (or more frequently), and that the city revise its ordinance to specify that all on-site systems are to be inspected at least biennially by an inspector licensed and certified by the MPCA to promote uniformity and a higher degree of environmental protection. Surface Water Quality The city adopted a resolution on June 2, 1992, indicating it will adopt National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) design standards or their equivalent for new stormwater ponds and the MPCA's urban best management practices titled Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas or their equivalent standards for use in managing stormwater runoff from all future development within the city. This action is consistent with the Council's Interim Metro-wide Nonpoint Source Pollution Implementation Strategy. Transportation (Carl Ohm) The transportation element of the plan is concerned with assuring an appropriate and efficient transportation system to its residential and business communities. To this end, the city's first goal is: to ensure adequate internal and external transportation access and links for efficient movement of people and goods throughout the transportation network and incorporating a variety of transportation modes. The road network within the city of Andover consists of minor arterials, collectors and local streets. The city has no principal arterials within its limits. 13 The plan indicates that the city is primarily a commuter-oriented community. Most people living in Andover work elsewhere. This fact raises several issues: . Peak hour congestion exists along Round Lake, Hanson and Bunker Lake Boulevards and Seventh Avenue N.W. This congestion occurs within the community on Bunker Lake Boulevard and outside the community at the intersection of Round Lake Boulevard with TH 10 and Hanson Boulevard and TH 10. . A deficiency of east-west corridors creates inefficient travel across the city and inefficient access to Highway 65, which lies east of the city limits in the city of Ham Lake. . A lack of public transit within the community requires that commuters use a more personalized mode of transportation such as the automobile. As noted, the city has no principal arterials within its borders, and TH 10 is already experiencing some congestion problems. TH 10 is a metropolitan highway that runs through Coon Rapids south of Andover. TH 65 is a metropolitan highway that runs through Ham Lake east of Andover. Since Andover is requesting an expansion to the MUSA, it is the city's responsibility to demonstrate that the proposed development will not generate traffic that exceeds the capacity of TH 10 or TH 65. Policy 12 D of the Council's Transoortation Policv Plan (TPP) states that the Council will approve the expansion of the urban service area, including the urban service area of freestanding growth centers, only when the state and/or the appropriate local unit of government demonstrate that adequate highway improvements will be provided when needed to avoid exceeding the capacity of the affected metropolitan highway (See Page 29 of the TPP). \ In the Council's review of the Andover plan amendment, staff requested the city to re-evaluate the impacts of forecasted development on TH 10. The city forecasted traffic on TH 10 given anticipated land development in the city by the year 2010. The analysis found that a significant increase in traffic would occur on TH 10. The capacity of TH 10 would likely be exceeded should the forecasted development take place. The only solution presented was to increase the capacity of Coon Rapids Boulevard. The city of Coon Rapids objected to this solution. Policy 9 of the city's Transportation element states that the city should .coordinate transportation planning and implementation with neighboring affected jurisdictions." Since Andover contributes many commuters to TH 10, it is critical that all the additional a(fected communities (Anoka, Champlin, Dayton, Blaine, Coon Rapids) as well as Anoka and Hennepin Counties, Mn/Dot and the Metropolitan Council meet to consider a transportation study before the demand far outpaces the capacity of the roadways. Parks (Aorence Myslajek) The city's planning is consistent with plans for regional recreation open space. The city's plan properly recognizes the two regional recreation open space facilities within its boundaries, Bunker Hills Regional Park and Rum River Central Regional Park. In the case of Rum River Central '\ ) 14 / Park, the plan should make clear that at present there are only minimum facilities there, although more are planned. The map with proposed facilities might lead people to believe there is more development there than presently exists. The plan does not include a statement that recognizes that Anoka County Parks and Recreation is the agency that owns and operates the two regional parks. The plan includes a 1981 version of the classification system for local and regional recreation open space that is part of the Council's Recreation Open Space Development GuidelPolicy Plan. Differences between the 1981 version and the current version are: A conservancy lands category has been added to local facilities. Historic parks have been dropped as a special category and included under Special Features, which replaces Special Use. In its final plan, the city should use the newer version of the classification system. This is included in the new version of the Recreation Open Space Development GuidelPolicy Plan, which was mailed to local units of government. The city should explain more fully that it has modified some of the site size recommendations made in the classification to fit the local community's preferences. Andover has a large number of local parks. Many of them are small and were acquired as part of developer agreements. The city now intends to take cash rather than land where appropriate. / The city may find it expensive to maintain so many separate sites and may need to consider consolidating some of these facilities. The city's policies for protection of state, local and regional parks give good protection to those lands. An excellent inventory and very complete 5-year eIP is included within the plan. The trails plan is quite ambitious, but having the plan may increase the city's chances to acquire and develop segments. 15 ATTACHMENT 1 DRAFT - 1211/91 GENERALIZED METROPOLITAN URBAN AND RURAL SERVICE AREA -........I . Urban Service Area o Rural Service Area -- ..e:. -c-.e-. _,_....ea- - -- ---,. - --- .....--,...., _1.......----. _~ --- ~ .../ Nor!: Areas are showl'\ aI of M~. 1988. This mao m~ be changed through the procen Of amendin~ local comp~hensive plans. A. precise location of th~ umn service area for any community is available from the Metropolitan CounCil 0.11.1 Cenler. 612 291-8140. Some communilies h~ further slaged development within r"eir loal urb.in service .uea. This is nOI rerlt'Cted on lhis map. 11-2 \ '\ \ METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612291-6359 TDD 612291-0904 , DATE: December 14, 1992 TO: Metropolitan and Community Development Committee FROM: Richard Thompson SUBJECf: City of Andover Comprehensive Plan Amendment Overall Plan Revision Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 14206-5 Metropolitan Council District No.9 RECOMMENDATIONS (Revised 12/14/92) That the Metropolitan Council: 1. Adopt the above findings and the staff report as part of these recommendations. 2. Inform the city of Andover that pursuant to the Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minnesota Statutes Sec. 473.175, Subd. I), before it can put the plan amendment into effect it must: a. withdraw all MUSA expansion requests with the exception of 80 acres in Pinewood Estates. Winslow Hills and in Wevbridge in the plan until a comprehensive traffic analysis that evaluates the potential impact the planned land uses will have on rn 10 is completed and all parties have agreed to an implementation schedule. b. revise its ordinance to specify that all on-site systems are to be inspected at least biennially by an inspector licensed and certified by the MPCA 3. Recommend that the city amend its plan to reinstate its (dropped) on-site sewage system ordinance requirement of solids removal from all systems "not less than once every four (4) years" (or more frequently). 4. Recommend that the city amend its plan and city ordinances to specifically exclude any further use of private wastewater treatment plants within the city. 5. Recommend that the city amend its plan to restrict industrial development in the rural service area to those land uses that are consistent with the Council's policy for the General Rural Use Area, consistent with policies I-lOA and I-lOB of the Wastewater Treatment and Handling Policy Plan, and that generate only domestic-strength wastewater. 6. Recommend that the city of Andover participate in a joint city/county comprehensive traffic analysis that evaluates the potential impact planned land uses will have on rn 10. Land use strategies should be developed in conjunction with highway system management strategies to ensure that locally generated traffic does not exceed the metropolitan highway system capacity. / " ) '\ / - /. Recommend that the city amend and submit its comprehensive sanitary sewer plan to include the following: Design criteria for the temporary flow diversion faciiity, to include its average daiiy and peak hydraulic capacities, the municipal sanitary sewer system capacity limitations within which it must operate, its expected design life, and its capability of also providing service to the other areas within the city's CAB interceptor service area that are planned for development during the 2000-2005 planning period. Metropolitan Council Meeting of December 17, 1992 Business Item: B-2 '\ ) METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth St., St, Paul, MInnesota 55101 612/291-6359 REPORT OF THE METROPOLITAN AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Referral Report 92-72 DATE: December 17, 1992 TO: Metropolitan Council SUBJECT: City of Andover Comprehensive Plan Amendment Overall Plan Revision Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 14206-5 Metropolitan Council District No.9 BACKGROUND At its meeting on December 14, 1992, the Metropolitan and Community Development Committee discussed a staff report and recommendations dealing with the review of the city of Andover's Overall Comprehensive Plan Update and MUSA expansion request. ISSUES AND CONCERNS I Richard Thompson, Council staff (ext. 6457) presented a summary of the report and regional policy issues. He noted that the letter from the city requesting an extension of the deadline was at the request of the Metropolitan Council. He also explained that there was a major discrepancy between the city's employment numbers and the Council's. In 1990, the city showed 905 jobs, whereas the Council showed 2,278 jobs. He explained that the source of the data for the Council is the Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training. Generally, data for Andover is aggregated with data for Ramsey. In 1990, the data showed an unusually high percentage of construction jobs in the cities. These jobs may not be apparent in the city because many workers report directly to the job. Thompson explained that Council staff met with city representatives in Andover on Friday and as a result of that meeting, were recommending several changes in the recommendations. He handed out a set of revised (12/14192) recommendations and explained the changes. The changes involved the plan modification recommendation No.2. In 2 (a) he recommended that the phrase "with the exception of 80 acres in Pinewood Estates, Winslow Hills.itnd in Weybridge" be added. This would result in the city's being allowed to add these 80 acres to the MUSA He explained that this would be consistent with what was done in Ramsey and Blaine and would not appreciably affect traffic on TH 10. Both 2(a) and 2(b) were based on a 40-acre parcel outside the urban service area that was designated Industrial in the city's plan. Both 2(a) and 2(b) addressed vacant industrial land. However, city staff pointed out that the land is almost totally developed with only one small parcel left to be occupied, For this reason, he recommended that 2(a) and 2(b) be designated recommendations 4 and 5. "- / He further recommended that the first part of 2(d) be revised to "Recommend that the city amend its plan to reinstate its (dropped) on-site sewage system ordinance requirement of solids removal from all systems 'nOl less than once'every four (4) years" (or more frequently) and made recommendation no. 3. The second part of 2(d) would remain as 2(b), part of the plan modification: "revise its ordinance to specify that all on-site systems are to be inspected at least biennially by an inspector licensed and certified by the MPCA" Andover city manager Jim Schrantz and city planner Dave Carlberg spoke about the plan review and the 2(a) of the recommendations. Schrantz said that several studies of traffic impacts of additional development on TH 10 had already been done. He said that the city completed a study with the recommendation of widening Coon Rapids Boulevard, which is a county road. He said the city of Coon Rapids opposed this alternative. Schrantz also addressed the exception language in 2(a). He said that since city staff spoke with Council staff, another developer had come forward. He made reference to a letter from Gary Gorham of Gorham Builders and indicated the city thought the exception should be raised from 80 acres to 100 acres. He also requested that the word "withdraw" be changed to "delay". , '\ / Schrantz then caIled on Jerry Windschitl, a contractor and developer in Andover. Windschitl expressed concern with the Council's proposed action. He feared that shutting down development in Andover would result in homebuyers leaping over Andover either to the rural area or to areas outside the region such as Elk River, The chair caIled upon Carl Ohm, Council staff (ex. 6507) to explain the impacts of this MUSA expansion request on TH 10. He explained the process that was used to determine the extent of the impact. He indicated that some parts of TH 10 already appear to be congested, but the analysis was based on 2010 forecasts. He indicated that there is some margin for error in these calculations, and indicated that a 100-acre MUSA expansion would not greatly impact TH 10 at this time. He spoke about the meeting with affected communities in Blaine the week before. He indicated the Council would be willing to cooperate with the communities in preparing a study of the corridor or an update of part of the County's transportation plan, In response to a question regarding satisfaction of policy 12 D, he said that if adequate improvements were programmed by the state. county or city, it would be sufficient for the Council to aIlow further MUSA expansions. Jim Larsen, Council staff (ext. 6404) explained the need for 2(b). Schrantz questioned whether this requirement was being made of all communities in the region. Larsen indicated that it was a requirement in Medina and Hassan Township. It was a recommendation in Victoria. RECOMMENDATIONS '\ 1. Adopt the above findings and the staff report as part of these recommendations. 2. Inform the city of Andover that pursuant to the Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minnesota S\atutes See. 473.175, Subd. 1), before it can put the plan amendment into effect it must: a. withdraw all MUSA expansion requests with the exception of 100 acres in Pinewood Estates. Winslow Hills and in Wevbridee in the plan until a comprehensive traffic analysis that evaluates the potential impact the planned land uses will have on TH 10 is completed and all parties have agreed to an implementation schedule, b. revise its ordinance to specify that all on-site systems are to be inspected at least biennially by an.lnspector licensed and certified by the MPCA 3. Recommend that the city amend its plan to reinstate its (dropped) on-site sewage system ordinance requirement of solids removal from all systems "not less than once every four (4) years" (or more frequently). 4. Recommend that the city amend its plan and city ordinances to specifically exclude any further use of private wastewater treatment plants within the city. 5. Recommend that the city amend its plan to restrict industrial development in the rural service area to those land uses that are consistent with the Council's policy for the General Rural Use Area, consistent with policies I-lOA and 1-10B of the Wastewater Treatment and Handline PolicY Plan, and that generate only domestic-strength wastewater. r '\ / . ) \ / ) 6. Recommend that the city of Andover panicipate in a joint city/county comprehensive traffic analysis that evaluates the potential impact planned land uses will have on rn 10. Land use strategies should be developed in conjunction with highway system management strategies to ensure that locally generated traffic does not exceed the metropolitan highway system capacity. 7. Recommend that the city amend and submit its comprehensive sanitary sewer plan to include the following: Design criteria for the temporary flow diversion facility, to include its average daily and peak hydraulic capacities, the municipal sanitary sewer system capacity limitations within which it must operate, its expected design life, and its capability of also providing service to the other areas within the city's CAB interceptor service area that are planned for development during the 2000-2005 planning period. Respectfully submitted, Susan Anderson, Chair .~ ' METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 250 E. 5th Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612-291-6359 j RESOLUTION NO. --.. RESOLUTION REQUIRING MODIFICATION OF A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CIlY OF ANDOVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Andover, by letter submitted December 17, 1991, transmitted a proposed amendment to its adopted comprehensive plan regarding the city of Andover Overall Comprehensive Plan Update, in accordance with the Metropolitan Land Planning Act and the Council Guidelines for Reviewing Local Comprehensive Plan Amendments; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on December 14, 1992, the Metropolitan Council reviewed the city of Andover's plan amendment and adopted a plan review report, Referral Report 14206-5, in accordance with the Metropolitan Land Planning Act and the Council Guidelines for Reviewing Local Comprehensive Plan Amendments; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment has been reviewed for impacts on metropolitan systems, apparent consistency with other adopted Metropolitan Development Guide chapters and compatibility with plans of adjacent local units of government; and , ) WHEREAS, the Council has concluded that the amendment as proposed constitutes a substantial impact on or substantial departure from the Council's Transportation Policy Plan and the Council's Wastewater Treatment and Handlin~ Policy Plan, and that a plan modification is required prior to Council approval. NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that: A The Metropolitan Council finds that: 1. The Andover Comprehensive Plan forecasts 7,585 households in the city in 2000 which are inconsistent with Council forecasts of 7,150 for the same year. 2. The city needs to fully satisfy exception criteria 7, 10 and 11 in the appendix to the rural service area guidelines. The Council cannot approve an exception to the rural area policy until the city',responds to all of the criteria in the appendix to the MDIF rural area service area policy guidelines. 3. The Andover Comprehensive Plan shows only 905 jobs in the city in 1990, whereas the Metropolitan Council shows 2,278 jobs in the city in 1990. The Council forecasts moderate growth in employment to 3,150 in 2000. 4. The supply of developable land within the MUSA in Andover in 1992 is 402 acres. Based on Interim Council forecasts, the Council anticipates a demand with overage of 1,711 acres in the city in 2000. The city can justify adding 1,309 acres to the MUSA based on land demand and supply. ' '\ / 1 5. Sufficient capacity exists in both the Coon Rapids interceptor and Metropolitan WWfP to accommodate sanitary sewer flow from all of the city's growth as projeCted in this amendment through the planning period ending in 2010. 6. In March of 1992, the city submitted a formal request to the MWCC for provision of metropolitan sanitary sewer service to the western portion of the city through the CAB interceptor. , '\ / 7. This amendment indicates that service through the CAB interceptor would be needed to accommodate development" planned to occur during the 2000-2005 planning period, but segments of the CAB interceptor have not been constructed to enable metropolitan service through it to the city of Andover, 8. The demonstrated level of need in this amendment for metropolitan sanitary sewer service to Andover's CAB interceptor service area is inadequate to warrant the MWCC's proceeding with the necessary planning and construction of the CAB interceptor extension at this time. Presently, neither the Council's Wastewater Treatment and Handling Policy Plan nor the MWCC's implementation plan recommend the construction of the CAB extension during the period to 2010. 9. The city states that there are no existing or proposed municipal wastewater treatment plants within the city, but it does not have specific policies and ordinances in place to prevent or restrict their future siting within the city. 10. Over 2,600 on-site septic tank systems are in operation within the city providing sanitary sewer service to individual residences in the rural service area. The city relies on individual property owners to perform biennial inspections. Council staff is concerned about reliance on self-inspections by citizens for solids removal and system integrity. , '\ 11. The city adopted a resolution on June 2, 1992, indicating it will adopt National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) design standards or their equivalent for new stormwater ponds and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's urban best management practices titled Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas or their equivalent standards for use in managing stormwater runoff from all future development within the city, consistent with the Council's Interim Metro-wide Nonpoint Source Pollution Implementation Strategy. 12. The plan indicates that peak hour congestion exists along Round Lake, Hanson and Bunker Lake Boulevards and Seventh Avenue N.W. This congestion occurs within the community on Bunker Lake Boulevard and outside the community at the intersection of ,_ Round Lake ,Boulevard and TH 10 and Hanson Boulevard and TH 10. Increased development 'as proposed in the plan will increase this congestion. 13. A deficiency of east-west corridors creates inefficient travel across the city and inefficient access to Highway 65, which lies east of the city limits in the city of Ham Lake. 14. A lack of public transit within the community requires that commuters use a more personalized mode of transportation such as the automobile. 15. Andover has no principal arterials within the city. TH 10 which serves the city of Andover is already experiencing some congestion problems, TH 65 also serves the city. Policy 12 D of the Council's Transoortation Policy Plan states that the Council will approve expansion of the MUSA only when the state or appropriate local unit of government "- , / 2 demonstrates that adequate highway improvements will be provided when needed to avoid exceeding the capacity of the affected metropolitan highway. " , J 16. City forecasted traffic on TII 10 as a result of anticipated land development in the city by the year 2010 found that a significant increase in traffic would occur on TII 10. The capacity of TII 10 would be exceeded should the forecasted development take place. 17. It is critical that all affected communities, Anoka and Hennepin Counties and MnJDOT and the Metropolitan Council meet to consider a transportation study before demand far outpaces the capacity of the roadways. 18. The city recreation element is consistent with the Council's Recreation Open Space Development Guide/Policy Plan. B. The Metropolitan Council concludes that: 1. Adopt the above findings and the staff report as part of these recommendations. 2. Inform the city of Andover that pursuant to the Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minnesota Statutes Sec. 473.175, Subd. 1), before it can put the plan amendment into effect it must: a. withdraw all MUSA expansion requests with the exception of 100 acres in Pinewood Estates. Winslow Hills and in Wevbrid~e in the plan until a comprehensive traffic analysis that evaluates the potential impact the planned land uses will have on TII 10 is completed and all parties have agreed to an implementation schedule. / b. revise its ordinance to specify that all on-site systems are to be inspected at least biennially by an inspector licensed and certified by the MPCA 3. Recommend that the city amend its plan to reinstate its (dropped) on-site sewage system ordinance requirement of solids removal from all systems "not less than once every four (4) years" (or more frequently). 4. Recommend that the city amend its plan and city ordinances to specifically exclude any further use of private wastewater treatment plants within the city. 5, Recommend ,,that the city amend its plan to restrict industrial development in the rural service area 'to those land uses that are consistent with the Council's policy for the General Rural Use Area, consistent with policies I-lOA and I-lOB of the Wastewater Treatment and Handlin!! Policv Plan, and that generate only domestic-strength wastewater. 6. Recommend that the city of Andover participate in a joint city/county comprehensive traffic analysis that eviiluates the potential impact planned land uses will have on TII 10. Land use strategies should be developed in conjunction with highway system management strategies to ensure that locally generated traffic does not exceed the metropolitan highway system capacity. '. 3 7. Recommend that the city amend and submit its comprehensive sanitary sewer plan to include the following: ' Design criteria for the temporary flow diversion facility, to include its average daily and peak hydraulic capacities, the municipal sanitary sewer system capacity limitations within which it must operate, its expected design life, and its capability of also providing service to the other areas within the city's CAB interceptor service area that are planned for development during the 2000-2005 planning period. \, , Adopted this 17th day of December . 1992. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL By Dottie Rietow, Chair By Sandi Lindstrom, Secretary \ .' .:..(", "- / 4 ~~- ~" ~\'t\ \"'), ~{ ; ~ jf ) \;;:=<,/ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE January 19, 1993 Engineering AGENDA SECTION NO, Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM ATV Ordinance Discussio NO, BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to discuss the possible amendment to Section 3 Operating on Public Property relating to all-terrain vehicles. This has been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission at both the November 24, 1992 meeting and December 8, 1992 meeting. After the Commission reviewed the request from ATV operators and information provided by City staff the recommendation is as follows: The Commission recommends no change regarding ATV's in the current ATV/Snowmobile Ordinance, however, it strongly recommends creating greater restrictions on snowmobile usage within the City. Note: Due to the number of complaints regarding snowmobile usage in the City, staff has contacted the Anoka County Sheriff's Department and DNR to patrol those areas on snowmobile where there is a problem. Round Lake Boulevard and Kelsey-Round Lake Park are high on the list. Note: Staff has altered the normal newsletter article that is published to inform the operators of ATV's and snowmobiles that the State Law and the Ordinance will be enforced. We hope this will gain control of the problems that have happened recently. There is a lot of backup material on this issue. If you need additional information please contact me at City Hall. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY " CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / DATE December 8, 1992 AGENDA ITEM " ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA 6. Discussion - ATV/ Snowmobile Ordinance -(~ BY: Todd J. Haas BY: The Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to continue discussing a possible amendment to Section 3 Operation on Public Property relating to all-terrai~vehicles. The City Staff has researched, as requested by the Commission, other cities in Anoka County as to the regulations/operations pf all-terrain vehicles. The cities researched are as follows: * City of Blaine - regulated by ordinance. Comments - Basically recreational motor vehicles are allowed on public right-of-ways lying east of Highway 65 between the north and south corporate limits. ATV's would not be allowed lying west of Highway 65. * City of East Bethel Comments - All-terrain vehicles are not to be operated upon public lands, waters or property under the jurisdiction of the City or upon streets and highways within the City. * City of Ham Lake Comments - No ATV shall be operated within the right-of-way of any public roadway within the City of Ham Lake. * Township of Oak Grove Comments - regulated by state Statute. * City of Ramsey Comments - regulated by State statute. The ordinances of the cities are enclosed for your reference in addition to the State Statute requirements. , I , Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - December 8, 1992 Page 3 .I DISCUSSION - ATV/SNOWMOBILE ORDINANCE Mr. Carlberg reviewed the research regarding the regulations and operations of all-terrain vehicles in other cities of Anoka County. Jerry Barber, 14443 Raven Street - explained that Andover is below the agriculture zone designated by the State; therefore, ATV's could not be driven on any State or county roads between April 1 and August 1. The State also regulates who can and cannot ride in the ditches, He also noted a handout from the various ATV organizations as to what they stand for. They are not out to do destruction to property. If there is a problem, they are available to take care of it. Harold Sullivan, 15300 prairie Road - stated the authorities feel Andover's ordinance are not strong enough in defining noise pollution. He noted the problem of both snowmobiles and dirt bikes and their infringement on his life style. He felt noise is the biggest objection to allowing the ATV's. Serqeant Campbell, Anoka Countv Sheriff's Department stated the problem with snowmobiles on Round Lake has been excessive speed. That seems to be less of a problem as the speed trials have been moved to more northern lakes. He felt Mr. Sullivan had a legitimate point. Dirt , bikes are a problem in Andover, but they don't have many complaints on ATV's or snowmobiles. He presumed if ATV's were allowed, they would receive more complaints on them. Kari Richner, 17750 Uplander - sympathized with the noise problem raised by Mr. Sullivan. She lives on the back of 58, and there is noise there too. She doesn't ride past 9 or 10 at night or try to make noise with her machine like she knows snowmobilers do. She suggested putting a restriction in the ordinance that they cannot ride after 10 o'clock at night. But she didn't know what a happy medium would be for the noise issue, questioning how to tell thousands of snowmobiles and four- wheelers that they can't ride because it interferes with another's lifestyle. A representative of the Anoka County Director of ATV's stated Mr. Sullivan has a point. But in the last few years, the DNR has required spark arresters for dealing with dry grasses and fields. Each year they have lowered the decibels on the ATV's and snowmobiles. Mr. Barber - stated they are asking for permission to ride in the northern portion of the City only such as north of CoRd 20. Last time it was brought up that the ordinance might be written to allow only Andover residents to ride ATV's or riding with an Andover resident. .He thought that was a good idea. Serqeant Campbell - thought it was a good idea in theory, but advised seeking legal counsel on the matter. One of the problems in the past is that dealerships would tell buyers to go up to Andover to ride their ATV's. After issuing many tags over one or two years, the problem was resolved. ' Andover Planning and zoning Commission Meeting , Minutes - December 8, 1992 ) Page 4 (Discussion - ATV/Snowmobile Ordinance, Continued) Mr. Barber - wanted no more rights than the snowmobilers. He suggested they talk to the dealerships in the geographic area about riding in Andover. They would like to ride in the northern portion of Andover to access Oak Grove or Sherburne County, to places where they can ride. Mrs. Richner _ stated they have to trailer their ATV two blocks to be able to ride because it is illegal to ride in Andover. Commissioner Peek did not support relaxing the ordinance for ATV's but did support being more restrictive on snowmobiles, especially in the southern portion of the City. Commissioner Jonak felt it is inevitable that snowmobiles will have more restrictions. He felt ATV's tear up the ground in this kind of weather. with the possibility of further restrictions on snowmobiles, he couldn't see being less restrictive on ATV's. Chairperson Dehn understood the desire to ride ATV's, but also saw the damage caused in boulevards, yards that go to the road, etc. She also sympathized with the noise issue raised by Mr. Sullivan. \ ) Residents present stated they did not initiate the discussion to place more restrictions on snowmobilers. There is talk of more restrictions and the damage they cause, but nothing is being done. They just want a few privileges that snowmobilers have and have a legal riding area in the City. MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Pease, that the Planning and Commission recommends no change regarding ATV's in the ATV/Snowmobile Ordinance; however, it strongly recommends greater restrictions on snowmobile usage within the City. carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Apel, Jovanovich, McMullen) vote. zoning current creating Motion OTHER BUSINESS Towing Service/Impound Lot in Industrial Area - Mr. Carlberg explained the Council has asked the Planning Commission to consider allowing the operation of a towing service in the Industrial Area. Lund's Towing Service has been operating at Eddie's Auto Body, Bunker Lake Boulevard, for a year. The use is not permitted under the ordinance, and Council thinking in the past has been to not allow any more automobile related uses in the City.' Others who have inquired about opening a towing company have been told no. ) Robert Lund. 1329 Quinn - stated he has been towing for the Sheriff's Department in Andover for accidents. Cars are only there until the insurance company adjusts them, and then they go to other body shops. The number of cars at anyone time is not more than 25. He does not buy or sell junk. He also provides 24-hour service for starting cars in Andover. He has been operating as a business for a year. Since the area is fenced and closely related to the other uses in the area, he thought it was permitted. , - -------~-_._-~---_._-- ---- --- ---, ------ CITY OF ANDOVER \ J REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION January 19, 1993 DATE ITEM Eidelweiss street NO. Discussion/92-21 BY: Todd J. Haas AGENDA SECTION NO, Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering This is an informational item for the City Council. Two meetings have taken place. A recommendation from the Task Force has not been made. The Task Force should meet one more time to look at the options and make a recommendation to the City Council. Staff will discuss this with Mayor Jack MCKelvey, who is also Chairperson of the Task Force, to schedule a meeting. Woodland Development is in the process of recording the plat of Woodland Creek 3rd Addition. They also sent a letter indicating their intentions to continue looking to resolve the issue. I COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY SECOND BY \ TO I , ) - - W.-..d b...d.. c.,~e}: ,..J.. Add/f/c'" - E:,'.JQ(v.;dH:$1'" f'h,jec.+ 9.t:.-;~ " RECEIVED JAM 1 3 1993 " January 12, 1993 CITY OF ANUOVER The Honorable Mayor Andover City Hall 1685 N.W. Crosstown Andover, Minnesota Jack McElvey Boulevard 55304 Dear Mayor McElvey, I am writing you this letter to advise you that Woodland Development is holding lots three and four in Woodland Creek Third ..Addition until a decision is made regarding the new road. We are doing everything possible to work with the city regarding this matter. I Sincerely, B~~Westlund ~r~np~esident BDW: jah 830 West Main Street Anoka, Minnesota 55303 (612) 427-7500 FAX: (612) 427-0192 @\.......,',.,. "~ " ,..., 'i'\ ~~ " \:i j} ", If . /~>:! / "''''', ". ....,.. -.. ~-,",.",.~--- CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE January 19, 1993 Appoint standing Committees Admin. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT NO, staff, Committees, Com. ITEM NO. MOTION BY TO BY: V. Volk This item was continued from the last meeting. Council is requested to approve the committees as recommended by the Mayor. COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY @\~. "'~'~':.'~\...-- ,,.; :i 11 )'~ ,:' " ,~/ <<',,,.,,, . .,.._..,.,....-f.~_:~/ -.......,.ri ."- _._-._-------~ ~---------~._-- ---------- ---~---------- CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE January 19, 1993 ~g:NDA ~f~~ Committee ITEM Appoint Chairperson N09. P&Z and Parks ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT~ Planning --t:C.- David L. Carlberg BY: Ci ty planner APPRO~~ED FOR AG\, " BY} v REQUEST The City Council is requested to appoint a chairperson for the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Park Board. Bonnie Dehn has served as chair for the Planning and Zoning Commission for the past year. The Council may wish to reappoint Ms. Dehn or appoint a new chairperson. Jeff Kieffer has served as chairman on the Park Board for the past three years. The Council may reappoint Mr. Keiffer or reappoint a new chairperson. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY @\) ~ \~ .:/ J .'\""._...."'_<~.__ -',.<..... CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE January 19, 1993 AGENDA ~&!~~ Committee, NO, C . . omm~ss~on ITEM NO, /0. Economic Development Commi ttee Appointment I BY: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ---rJ Planning ~ ~ David L. Carlberg, City Planner APPRO~~OR ::jUu J REQUEST The Andover City Council is asked to consider appointing the following Andover residents to the Economic Development Committee: Robert N. Nowak Lyle Muehlbauer Kevin Martin Attached are the applications received for Council review. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY ;(~) CITY of ANDOVER '.......,J ~~ ADVISORY COMMISSION APPLICATION Name: J<obe,<tt N. NOvJIlkJ S~. Address: 13oCt> N.W. II/I!! LAlliE' Home Phone: '1.1'1-11"71 Work phone: ~7S- 75"~ Commission Preference: Planning & zoning Economic Development >< Park & Recreation Charter Commission Public Safety Committee Cable Comm. Equestrian Counci1____ Tree Commission Please state your reasons for requesting to be on the advisory commission checked above: T6 hal..f fH..t\'tJ t.kc... eeoN' M\'c:.. cL~V'cFt.UpM~~r O} ~'- e:,- to. ittN',..t.+ A,,,'),,.,eh i... fht.. ~~+y. Describe your education/experience which qualifies you to serve on this commission: 13.5. Of" ~ /111tc.~~4-eN lDlle e-~1I~5 IN Ac.t:(G- F'fVlil\Jt.. Tif-X. D,v,),.,j (kN17IN~CJf'J-'iju..J INe- - J If 7e/tfL~ U1 "IIS,"'C.', 'C,'(f v, ef(~. Describe your professional, civic or community activities which may be relevant to this commission: N/ffTfJlI,f[, lhutJ""'~ .,~ AeCAtlM1t'ofA /lIfeNlbtr/.; ~ ~J-J<S/cJ,Itr';t.;n~ d~ c;,,,rtKJ 1;"j,~e" MG-r toM,.,,/fd " r/ldJ "U~ fJt:;. V'N/~ p;. ;;;'~t7FA: Dated, 1;'-,ti-9~ :;.?~ f. uuu S 9 / CARGill PO Bo, 9300 Minneapolis, .W.N 5~9300 612/475-7592 Robert N, Nowak Corporate Finance and Special Projects Manager Lyle Muehlbauer 0~~:ce 2':.::-::(;,,;r,: ) ($" 1 ,1'\.. '~~C':':C>:' /J CITY of ANDOVER FJRsrl1.R ~- Firstar Bank of Minnesota, N.A. ;:"-.~.J'.er O'i:,:,:: 3":"':'5 Bunker Lc::':e 2c'..;:svard l\r.r~O'i8r, ;"i1:r,r.8so:iJ 55304 ~1':' '::-:-:'-C".::: - -',. - ~ ADVISORY COMMISSl___ Name: Lyle Muehlbauer FIRSTAR BANK OF MINNESOTA, N.A. Address: 3445 Bunker Lake Blvd.. Andover. MN 55304 Home Phone: 427-4612 Work Phone: 421-0198 Commission Preference: Planning & Zoning Park & Recreation Economic Development x Charter Commission Public Safety Committee Cable Comm. Equestrian Council____ Tree Commission Please state your reasons for requesting to be on the advisory ... ) commission checked above: To allow me to become more familiar with commercial development in the City of Andover and offer what advisory service I can to other commit.t.ee members.d. . h' h l' f' Descr~be your e ucat~on/exper~ence W lC qua ~ ~es you to serve on this commission: Community bank management expe~ience since 1964 in Anoka County. Describe your professional, civic or community activities which may be relevant to this commission: Board member Alexandria House, Inc., member Anoka area Chamber of Commerce and Anoka County Chamber of Commerce. and Office President of Firstar Bank Andover, Dated:/~~;9~~ :I~1o//~a&--I--tp\- -sl7ture ,~c(J , " ,L71 , ~~\. .......---. .,.......~/~" CITY of ANDOVER ADVISORY COMMISSION APPLICATION Name: ! .... I -< l:jJi .V , rv\AVrl J Address: 131.957 'f../tvi5 Home Phone: ? s/f-Y'7 9 'I ST N vJ ~c)Je.iL Work Phone: ~5(-~~60 Commission Preference: Planning & Zoning Economic Development Park & Recreation Cj Charter Commission Public Safety Committee Cable Comm. Equestrian Council____ Tree Commission Please state your reasons for requesting to be on the advisory commission checked above: ,<5 kJ -fL.}- 4 r3cy tV~') -;:;p i~IkA/ Ie; t!0-s.-//Y,bSs" '/tfV I~ Atv":> Wh/-r 7Z-' d-ff A- P4f:--r t.-r ~-if 6.covol( Describe your education/experience which qualifies you to serve on this commission: ;J~ G!('~'I.IJ'>1[tS /n'l.-it'l('K!- c;ei&.v~rF I Describe your professional, C~V1C or community activities which may be relevant to this commission: ;11t9Y/;3,tR. ~{')O~Z </,Lee /' / Dated: /?_IP-'?2- / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION : ) AGENDA SECTION NO, Staff, Committees, Comm. DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT January 19, 1993 Admin. ~~oi6R .jfY- \~ ITEM Approve Water Resource NO, Management Plan 1/. BY: Jim Schrantz . The City Council is requested to approve the Water Resource Management Plan. We started revising the Management Plan in 1989. The plan has been approved by the Coon Creek Watershed District and the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization and satisfies the statutes on a local water management plan. If the City Council approves the plan we will have TKDA bind the plan in a 3 ring notebook to allow for future changes. The plan is in the front of the packet. Dan Fabian from TKDA will be at the meeting if the Council has any questions. Dan did the work on the plan. The Council has looked at parts of this plan before and also this plan is consistent with the Watershed and WMO plans that the Council has approved. MOTION BY COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY ) TO CITY OF ANDOVER \, J REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO, ff . Sta , Comm~ttees, Comm. ITEM Approve Signal/Crosstown NO, & Bunker Lake Boulevard 1#1. DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT January 19, 1993 Admin. APPROVED FOR AGErA I~ lfid BY: Ie( - J BY: Jim Schrantz The City Council is requested to consider the County's plans to install a signal at CSAH #18 (Crosstown Boulevard) at Bunker Lake Boulevard. We request Council's approval of the priority of the signal in Andove r . Attached is a letter outlining the various options. If Council is satisfied with the location, staff will work with the County Highway Department on the type of signal and the related costs. Attached is a letter from Jon Olson, Deputy County Engineer. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY ) TO , SECOND BY COUNTY OF ANOKA Department of Highways Paul K. Ruud, Highway Engineer 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 612-754-3520 December 22, 1992 City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, ~. 55304 Attention: Jim Schrantz, City Engineer Regarding: 1993 Signal Projects Dear Jim: Anoka County is currently in the process of defining signal system installations for 1993 and one of those installations will affect your City. Currently, we are obtaining proposals for the design of six (6) signal systems county wide and the sigJ.!al system at Bunker Lake Boulevard and County State Aid Highway Number 18 (Crosstown Boulevard) will affect the City of Andover. -~--- ,,', E--C El'v En HI DEe 3 ; 199ZlU ,- CITY OF ANDOVER Project Number 93-10-18 is located at the intersection of CSAH #18 and Bunker Lake Blvd. and the Office of State Aid has assigned an Andover Project Number of 198-020-10. We are currently determinin~ whether or not a permanent signal or if a temporary signal will be constructed at this intersection. If a temporary signal is installed, the cost to the City of Andover will be the cost of power as well as the cost of the installation of the initial service for power. If it is determined that Bunker Lake Boulevard can be widened sufficiently at this time to allow for the construction of a permanent signal, the cost to the City of Andover is estimated at an additional $40,000.00. / We are providing this information to you at this time so that you may budget for these costs at your earliest convenience. Because of the late date, we anticipate that you may not be able to budget for these costs until 1994 and if this is the case, that would be acceptable to Anoka County provided we can count on reimbursed for these costs in January of 1994. If a temporary signal is indeed installed, we anticipate that a permanent si~al will be installed at this location with the reconstruction of CR 116 withlO the 5 year period, In the event a temporary signal is installed at this time, we would look for the City of Andover to share in the cost of the construction of the permanent signal. .I Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer ~"-......,.....___._""t'a COUNTY OF ANOKA Department of Highways Paul K. Ruud. Highway Engineer 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 612-754-3520 " -2- If you have any questions regarding this information, please feel free to contact either myself or Jane Pemble. Sincerely, oL Jo G. Olson, PE Deputy County Engineer I xc: Commissioner Nick Cenaiko xc: Commissioner Elect Sue Green xc: Jane Pemble xc: Doug Fischer dmh/lANDOVER "- I , Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer CITY OF ANDOVER \ J REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION JanuafilT~9, 1993 AGENDA SECTION NO, Staff, Committee, ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Recycling @ , e)\L- Cindy DeRuyter BY: Recycling Coordinator BACKGROUND For the last two years, Ace Solid Waste has let the City use their roll off recycling dumpsters once a week for the purpose of emptying the recycling building of glass, plastic, and metal cans. Public Works' employees have been doing the labor. This cost, including city equipment, comes to over $5000. yearly. Ace Solid Waste has recently come under new ownership and they no longer want to leave the roll-offs at the center, because it is not cost effective for their company. We have received four bids for the purpose of removing recyclables. They are from: Ace Solid Waste, Super Cycle, Peterson Brothers, and Johnson Sanitation. At the present we have Super Cycle taking the magazines for $25/ per pick up using four containers. It seems to average two times a month for this service. Pretzel Sanitation picks up cardboard for $90/ per month, which is two containers/ twice a week. The bids are as follows: Ace $355.00 per month ($ 4260.00/year) to include: plastic, glass, metal cans, magazines, and cardboard Super Cycle $225.75 per month ( $2709.00/ year) to include: plastic, glass, metal cans, magazines. We would still need to use Pretzel for cardboard which is $1080.00/year. So the total cost would be $3789.00/year. Peterson Brothers 300.00 per month ($3600.00/year) not including cardboard. Total cost: $4680.00/year. The Johnson Sanitation bid did not meet our requirements and was also more costly. Staff recommends that we contract with Super Cycle for 12 months, continue with Pretzel, and review the contracts in January, 1994. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER '\ ) REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION JanualiArk9, 1993 AGENDA SECTION NO, Staff, Committee, __... ,~~...uu ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Recycling ~ :~YE2)R B~I ITEM NO: / /'f. Manning and Maintenanc ,~- -, . ~ -J Cindy DeRuyter BY: Recycling Coordinator BACKGROUND Most Anoka County Cities' recycling centers remain open 24 hours with maintenance handled by a hired person. Andover'S Recycling Center has been attended by two area Boy Scouts troops on Saturdays for five hours for the past two and one half years. They have been paid $25. per week for this service. Many times the Boy Scouts did not have adult supervision and this is a potential safety hazard. Also, since this past summer of 1992, Wayne Patchen, a retired public work's employee, has maintained the Center clean-up for an hour each morning. REQUEST , , The City Council is asked to consider hiring Wayne Patchen to maintain the Recycling Center on a regular basis approximately six hours a week. Sometimes it can easily be less and sometimes a little more. We feel that this would service using a retired City employee. time by regular city employees, equipment. our recycling program better, by This would reduce the amount of since Wayne can operate the The funding for the recycling program comes from Anoka County, the SCORE tax bill and the Metropolitan Council. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY \ TO , SECOND BY (Qi") \ ~r\D ...-:;r' ) <" ,'.>' ~'--':^..li:"".~':.~-- CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DAT~anuary 19, 1993 AGENDA SECTION NO, Staff, Commi ttee, Comm. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Recycling Cindy DeRuyter ~f- By~ecycling Coordinator APP~~E R AGENrA /t' OlY: ITE~pprove License Fees/ NQ Garbage Haulers /S'. BACKGROUND Andover City Council has approved to license garbage haulers operating in the City of Andover. The following are fees charged by area cities, using the open hauling system. Anoka $50.00 / year per license, $25.00 each additional truck. Coon Rapids $25.00 / year per license per company, $15.00 per truck. Ramsey $25.00 / year, $15.00 per truck. } Columbia Heights $50.00 per hauler with submission of proof of insurance. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY @\~<" ":}~... .,::", 't~ ;~ \,~j ) '",c:~.;<'i CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO, APP_ECRC VED FOR AGE ~ BY, ;I)b J The City Council is requested to approve the kennel license renewal for Hobnail Dalmatians, 16326 Verdin Street N.W. DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT January 19, 1993 Staff, Committees, Com. ITEM NO, /". Approve Kennel Lic. Renewal/Hobnail Dalma iB~~ Admin. V. Volk The appropriate documents have been filed and the fees have been paid. We have received no complaints regarding this operation over the past year. MOTION BY : TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION , I DATE AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT NO, Staff, Committees, Co January 19, 1993 ITEM NO, /'7. Declare City Hall a S Free Workplace Admin. ke BY: V. Volk Attached is a petition from all of the employees at City Hall requesting that City Hall be declared a smoke free workplace. This would not include the Senior Citizen Center. Section 4620.0300 of the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act states that smoking shall be prohibited in all sections of public places or public meetings except in areas designated as smoking- permitted areas. Also, with the EPA's findings that second hand smoke causes cancer, we feel that this is something that should be done. Also, Frank Stone would like to have smoking prohibited except in designated areas at the public works building. If Council approves of this, signs will be installed in accordance with the Clean Indoor Air Act. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY , ) The following city employees request that the City Council declare City Hall a Smoke Free Building: dJJ<--tL- ~ f?;J ~ (!.f1CLk1,"~~ II J R1L<- b~F~s::~~a_~ M~J'"" ~/A'-';;;:(,....,.J I' /5:7t-.~ u'ldL \&~ ~{'J6Ol\.- j/fJ&. &.Ic'L,L W / I/tt~ ;3~(91~ ?~~#:L /{llcJ 7iU~.J/A fl.' } ~;~ --- ,/ '/~~///4~~~ / ;/1' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO, DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT January 19, 1993 ITEM NO, /8. Building Staff, Committee, Comm Boundary Commission BY: D. L. Almgren The Boundary Commission consists of three residents (David Chad, George Kerr and Larry Dalien), Ken Orttel representing the Council, and Dave Almgren. Since Ken Orttel is no longer the Mayor, staff suggests that he remain on the Commission as a resident and Larry Dalien remain on the Commission as the Council representative. Ken has agreed to remain on the Commission as a resident. All of the terms expire on October 2, 1993. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER " ) REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE January 19, 1993 Appoint Election Judge!; BY: APPRO~ED OR AGEIjB. I BY:'} V The City Council is requested to approve the attached resolution appointing election judges for the special election for County Commissioner. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT AGENDA SECTION NO, t ff . Sa, Comm~ttees, COlI In. ITEM NO, /e;. Admin. V. vOlk6,~' The Primary Election is to be held on Tuesday, February 9, 1993 and the General Election will be Tuesday, March 2, 1993. V:Attach. , ) MOTION BY , TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY '. CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA J NO. R A RESOLUTION APPOINTING JUDGES FOR THE SPECIAL PRIMARY ELECTION TO BE HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 1993 AND THE SPECIAL GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD TUESDAY, MARCH 2, 1993 IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby resolves: The persons as shown below are hereby appointed judges for the Special Primary Election to be held on Tuesday, February 9, 1993 and the Special General Election to be held on Tuesday, March 2, 1993 in the City of Andover: Precinct 12 - Riverdale Assembly of God Church Diane Patchen, Chief - IR Alice Gelling - IR Rosemary Kirkevold - DFL Cleo Smith - DFL Darlene Stone - IR Mabel Ottenstroer - DFL Rene Kroll - DFL '. Precinct 13A Andover Fire Station 11 J Sharon Rzeszutek, Mary May Terry VanNote Delores Meyers Cindy Ryhn Chief - IR - DFL - IR - DFL - IR Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 19th day of January , 1993. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk \ I I @\'"'-"";'." .~'\ " ~~ .~ u ) ,\.... (;'J '~:.':'':7~::~:/' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE January 19, 1993 AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning ~ David L. Carlberg BY: City Planner APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. 6/.0, Approve Summary Garbage Ordinance BY: REQUEST The City Council is requested to review and approve the attached summary to Ordinance No. 102, Garbage Ordinance. The summary will be published in the Anoka Union in place of the ordinance to decrease the publishing costs. Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.191 gives the City the authority to publish summaries if ordinances are lenghty as long as the summary clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY \ CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA / ORDINANCE NO. 102 SUMMARY TITLE AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE STORAGE, COLLECTION AND TRANSPORTATION OF GARBAGE, RECYCLABLES AND REFUSE WITHIN THE CITY OF ANDOVER. SUMMARY It is the purpose of this Ordinance to protect the public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City by requiring each residential, commercial or industrial property to properly store and dispose of garbage, recyclables and refuse as defined in this Ordinance. The Ordinance will also require that all garbage, recycling and refuse collectors operating within the City be licensed. GENERAL REGULATIONS / Refuse in Streets, etc. No person shall place any refuse, recyclables and yard wastes in any street or public place upon any private property except in proper containers for collection. No person shall throw or deposit refuse, recyclables and yard waste in any body of water or in such manner as to cause litter or contamination of the environment. Scattering of Refuse; Composting. No person shall bury any refuse in the City except in an approved sanitary landfill. a. Compost upon private property. Yard waste and easily biodegradable, non poisonous garbage may be composted on the premises, where such yard waste/refuse has been accumulated or on private property with the owner's consent. Disposal Required. Every household or occupant or owner of any residence, commercial or industrial establishment shall, in a sanitary manner, dispose of refuse and recyclables that may accumulate upon the owner or occupant's property through a collection service licensed by the City on a weekly basis or by other methods approved by the city. Recyclables shall be collected at a minimum on a biweekly basis. \ License Required for refuse collection. It is unlawful to collect, haul or convey refuse from any premises in the City, other than from one's own residence, without a valid license thereof. Each such vehicle so used, except for personal disposal, must be licensed for such activity. Applications for a license hereunder shall be submitted to the City for review and recommendation. If the Council is satisfied that the public need, convenience and good order will be served \ ; Page Two Ordinance No. 102 Summary thereby, it may grant a license to such applicant. Licenses shall be issued for a period of one year, expiring on March 31st of each year. The license fee shall be established by Council resolution and may be adjusted. Each licensee shall provide weekly collection and removal of refuse from residences within the City and complete collection of all refuse which normally results from day to day use of the type of property, except furnishings, appliances, construction waste and similar bulky waste for which individuals shall make special arrangements. Each licensee shall provide curbside recycling to each residential property within the City on at least a biweekly basis. The licensee shall provide monthly pick-ups of at least four broad types (plastics, glass bottles, metal cans and newspaper) of recyclable materials. Any license issued hereunder may be revoked or suspended by the City Council if false statements have been made in the application therefor and may be revoked upon failure of a licensee to comply with the requirements of the ordinances of the City of Andover. The City Administrator or his authorized representatives shall have the primary responsibility for the enforcement of the provisions of this Ordinance. Any person, firm, or corporation who violates any of the provisions of this Ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor, and each day in which such person continues to violate the provisions of this shall constitute a separate offense. This Ordinance shall be effective from and after its passage and publication according to law. Adopted this 15th day of December, 1992, by the City Council of the City of Andover. A Printed copy of Ordinance No. 102 is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk or at the Andover Branch of the Anoka County Library. / COC',) \ ,~r\.! ) "- .'/ '~-. . " ." -~.?"-...,~~'- .1,,_ ,~. ,_ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION January 19, 1993 DATE AGENDA SECTION NO. Non-Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Finance APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM NO, / b(. Receive December Financial Statements BY: Daryl E. Sulander A()" Finance Director)~ BY: REQUEST The Andover City Council is requested to receive the unaudited preliminary December 1992 Financial statements for the General, Water and Sewer Funds. Please note: 1) These statements include the amended revenue and expenditure budgets adopted by resolutions R130-92 and R226-92. 2) These statements are preliminary reports, prior to the recording of various year end transactions. The final unaudited reports will be completed by March 15, 1993, at which time the auditors will begin their review. 3) The C.P.A. firm of Malloy, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A., will perform the audit for our 1992 operations. This is the third year of a three year agreement them. 4) The Water and Sewer Funds revenue includes only the first three quarters service charges. The billing for the fourth quarter service is in process. Fourth quarter revenue figures will be available for Council information at the meeting. Should there be any questions regarding the information presented, please contact me prior to the meeting so I may have adequate time to research the question. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY ) TO SECOND BY CITY OF ANOOVER YlAR TO DAIl SUMMARIES I-uk GlNERAL, WATER AND SEWER FUNDS As of 31Dec92 / RE,vi s€.d eudqet Y€'E1r' to D.:lte Actual Per' c €. n t 0'1 '~1 E' I<ern,:; in in.? G ENE R A L FUN 0 ,:::VE~JUES ---------.-------------- --------------._____0__-- 2 '" GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES SUSINESS LICENSES AND PERMITS NON-BUSINESS LICENSES & PERM1TS e.uildin:~ Related ot h€. r' INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVtNU~ CHARGES FOR SERVICES str'eet l.iqhtinq OthE'r' COURT FHJES 5; F' Eel {I, L A 5; E; E 5; 5; M E rrr 5; Ml~~tLLANtuU~ ~~VtNUt lnter'e=": ECElr'ned Refunds and Reimbursements . / I.....Jt r1€'r' TRANSFERS FROM OTH~R FUNDS Fr()ffi A0min. Trust Fllnd I-r'om 111- 1-1 I'und Fr.om TIF 1-2 Fund 1,113,714,00 20,325.00 305,546.00 G.2S0.00 606,067.00 73,600.00 23.300,00 hO.OOO.OO 1,00(1.00 ~;L.GOO.OO 28,h31.00 ~i . j U lJ . U U C<:,300.00 24,UUU.IJU (:,0(10.00 1,091,217,60 14,634,65 413,663.09 G.65h,10 bo3.ULL.Lb 53,517.l~l~ [,:',028.99 32,463.63 lJ-~?[)6.8~) 18,126.41 1,7, 182. 17 ~:~.Llbo.1~l (:3.:'00,00 i4,UUU.UU 6,000,00 ( 3 ~; 'i ( (;) U 27 { 93 ) 1 8 ( 3:;> 5) G6 ( (5) ( /:::; ) TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 2,~25.h33.00 ( 2 ) ..----------- ----------..- 2.~86.0S5,3~ u.____________ -----------.. \ / CITY OF ANDOVEF; YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES I- U,"": GENERAL. WATER AND SEWER FUNDS As of 31Dec92 R8Vi 5E,d E.ud'Jet Yeer to Dete PerC8ntege Actual Remaining -------------- ----------- G E rJ ERA L ~. X >, E rJ D I F U r,1 Co T U R E ::: 5 ( 10) ------------------------- ----------------------- CITY COUNCIL N'OWSLETTER MAy.....},< ELECTIONS ADMHJ I ~:n:ATJ ON FII.AI"~l.AL. AUIVIII>I.;"RAIIOIJ AUDITING ASSESSING AIIO:,:NEY PLANNING AND ZONING D A T A >'~: 0 C E ~: ~: 1 rJ G CITY HALL BUILDING FIRE STATION 8UILDING 'PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING ~ ~; E: N J c) ~: C I I J. : t l'J I ~:; l....:~. )\1 I !: ~: EQUIPMENT BUILDING ENCiHHFRIrJCi FUL.I(,2 ~"OTc'_-,-Iu" FI R E P ROTECTIGrJ RESCUE SERVICE f' r.: u Ill, I 1 V t. ). N :;, f' t '- I J. U r, CIVIL DEFENSE nn~1A.L CONTF;OL ~IKtcl~ ANU H~uriWAY~ SNOW AND ICE REMOVAL STORr" SEWERS :;, 1 r.: l l ILl ,_, ti I 1 N '.:J STREET SIGNS TRAFFIC SIGNAL.~: '" Keto I Ll'.:JH '" bILL.EC! PARK AND RECREATION TREES AND 'wEED CONTROL r~ !:--I....l.l..... L l~~t."l ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT UNALLOCATED IM~kuv~MtNI ~KUJ~~I~ OTHH: FINANCING USE~: 34,297.00 4.771.00 ,l~ . :':'':': 1 . U u 16.107.00 126.872,00 100.74".00 10,000,00 38.289,00 ::)u.bU(J.UU 54.166.00 Ll t; . -Ill c; .00 Lf.~).j/~.UU 31,':>64,00 17.388.00 (.: . U I ~ . (J l-' 2.975,00 'c'~' . El[, -/ . 00 411,737,60 274,976.00 32,380,00 I I I. ! ~ll . UU 6,362,00 10.235,00 IS.2, ::>:>.3 ,00 118,112,00 22.688.00 14,450,00 31,508.00 10.680,00 54,514,00 233,903.00 9,715.00 .:;/~':'So.uu 18.307,00 39,261.00 72,723.00 32.[,37,26 5.286.73 4. . ~ j 1 . :. ~, 15.831..50 121.,2[,2.0:) 104,987.15 10.497,75 39.047.00 :,lj. 0'04. .:U 51.377.83 1t:,211..OO 4 I , 1 b t: . I I 32.285,82 19.'519,89 ~).bU,i.13 1.97~:.55 (~1,::)?3.()4 4ilJ.855,34 247,622,81 30,717.16 1 I 1 . 'O/. I , I :;; 7,850.69 ~J,712,30 198,30$,04 59,970,54 16,793.69 1~.40u.~;; 22,583.31 '/ .261.89 52. 333. 70 157,512,54 7,923.60 ,:. L. . ~) , ~ . 6 tJ 17,438.12 27.454,00 66,512,69 u ( i, ) (II) ( 1 ) ( 1 i I 5 r=; ') (.3) (2) ( 12) jU -:-:;. ~ -' :) I,) 8 5 u (:23) :) ( :> ) 49 25 ( Ij) 28 32 2 32 18 4 30 8 El , ) TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 2.1.25,433.00 ------------ -------------- 2,196.269.58 ~------------ ------------ CITY OF MOOVER YE~~ TO DATE SUMMARIES f-uk GENERAL. WATER AND SEWER FUNDS As of 31Dec92 " F'~' r' CE: nt Elge F:ern,03;n;nq F:ev i 5E'ci C',ud,?,"t Yea r' toO 21 t E' Actu,,," 1 W ATE R FUN D REV E N U E S ------------------..-. -------------------- WATE:::: ~:AL U: tlIETEi~ S,ALES ?I,1 . 18 G .00 20.000.00 10.000.00 12,000.00 ~, c' ~~ M ~- ~:' ~- E :. ~: MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 220.162.12 50~59S.00 20.600.0D 12~85G.39 8 152 ) '\ (J 6) (7) TOTAL WATER FUND REVENUE 283,186.00 (7) .' -- - - - - -. ." - - - .- -- ." - - - - - - - - - - 304,213.51 ------------ ------------- W A T t ~ ~ U N U E X 0 ENS E S ------------------.. ------------.-------- -'I ,:. ..~ J ~:OURCE. ~:TORAGE AJJCi TREATME rH DISTRIBUTIC'N t"DMINl~;TRATIOrJ -; () . 6;' t, . 0 (, 102,798.00 108, 11". 00 l\ () ~ ? 3 1 . l~ 0 1 t, 1. '277 .21 I!.:! is. 'ob (37) 3Ll ',' 0:; T A ,_ .i ATE R F U tW E XF' UJ ~: E ~, 283,186.00 8 -----.----.--- -.-------.----- ?~,8.838.,_; ----.------.---. - - -. - - - .. .. - - -- - ~'\i " CITY OF MJDCNER YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES t-Ok GENERAL. WATER AND SEWER FUNDS As of 31Dec92 Revised Year to Date 8udget Actual e' e, I"' (: e fit .::;'~e Rem.3 ill i n'~; SEW E R FUN D f;EV::rJU[~: ..------------------- --------------.----- ~:EVER CHAJ;"GE~; HHtREST 396,300.00 2,000.00 303.269.22 3 1 :? :) i . j ~ 23 ( f:5 i+ ) TRANSFER FROM SEWER cOrm. FUND 30.500.00 ~) 0 . I, 9 61,000.00 ( 100) ~E:~'J~JC;~: AN[\ REI~1E~l!RSE~1ENT~: TOTAL SEWER FUND REVENUE 428,800,00 368.422.80 13 -- -, - - - - - -" -. - - - - - .. - - - - - - - -- - -------------- -.--------.--- ~ t ~ t ~ ~ U N U EXF'ENSE~: --------------------- -------------------- / COLLECTION 1'1':.'tr'oPo.litdrl Wcl::.,l_>:.: l.....on(I.0-) other' Expen:3':;:s ADMINI~;TRATION ",,,8.242.00 68,1,98.00 112,060.00 :i,[..244,OO 21.039,83 77,413.1/1 (, 69 30 TOTAL SEWER FUND EXPENSES i,2[:.800.00 3u6.()96.9~1 1 9 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE ,'rlnllrlry 1 Q 1 QQ~ AGENDA SECTION NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion Items Finance ITEM NO. Amend Budgets-General Water and Sewer Funds BY: Daryl E. Sulander Finance Director REQUEST The city Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution amending the 1993 budgets for the General, Water and Sewer Funds. BACKGROUND The City Council has approved the 1993 salary schedule and the implementation of the Central Equipment Fund since adopting the 1993 operating budget for the General Fund. This amendment does not change in total, the expenditures previously adopted. However, it does transfer the allocation of the City's resources between operating departments. In addition, I recommend two changes to the budgeting and reporting departments within the General Fund as follows: 1) Consolidate the Mayor and City Council budgets and expenditures into one reporting entity titled, "Mayor and Council". 2) Separate the Trees and Weed Control budget and expenditures into individual reports, one titled "Tree preservation and Maintenance" and the other titled "Weed Control". The consolidation of the Mayor and City Council reports will streamline the recording and reporting tasks of these two areas for the Finance Department. Currently, the only activity budgeted and recorded into the category "Mayor" is the Mayor's salary and benefits, all other expenditures are budgeted for in the City Council category. The separation of the Trees and Weed~ functions will allow the Public Works Superintendent, the Tree Inspector, and the Park Board to better identify the costs associated with, and subsequently budget for, these two activities. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY \ J , J , ) CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -93 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1993 GENERAL, WATER AND SEWER FUND BUDGETS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Andover has adopted Resolution Numbers R220-92 and R227-92 which established the 1993 budgets for the General and Enterprise Funds respectively; and WHEREAS, the City Council has taken action to reallocate the distribution of resources between the operating departments within the adopted budgets; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Andover deems it necessary to amend the adopted budgets so that financial reports properly state the effects of these actions. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that the 1993 budgets for the General, Water and Sewer Funds are hereby amended as shown on Attachment A. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 19th day of January , 1993. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk ATTACHMENT A GENERAL FUND AMENDMENTS , ======================= I Amendment Purpose 1. Implementation of 1993 Wage and Salary plan...... Breakdown by Function: General Government Public Safety Public Works Park and Recreation Recycling Economic Development Contingency 2. Implementation of Central Equipment Fund , ) Breakdown by Account: Gas - Vehicles Diesel Fuel RIM Supplies-vehicles Insurance-Vehicles RIM Labor-Vehicles Rental of City Equip. 3. Consolidation of Mayor and City Council Reporting Breakdown by Classification: Mayor Ci ty Council 4. separation of Tree and Weed Control Breakdown by Classification: Trees and Weed Control Tree Preservation and Maint. Weed Control Total General Fund '\ ) Increase (Decrease) in Revenue $ -0- --------- --------- $ -0- --------- --------- $ -0- --------- --------- $ -0- ========= $ -0- --------- --------- Increase (Decrease) in Expenditures $ -0- --------- --------- 36,464 6,502 12,830 3,301 542 1,448 (61,087) $ -0- --------- --------- (8,826 ) (14,150) (40,291) (19,081) (23,345) 105,693 $ -0- --------- --------- (3,984) 3,984 $ -0- --------- --------- (27,018) 18,509 8,509 $ -0- --------- --------- ATTACHMENT A (Con't) WATER FUND AMENDMENTS ====================== / Increase (Decrease) in Revenue Amendment Purpose 1. Implementation of 1993 Wage and Salary Plan...... $ -0- --------- --------- Breakdown by Function: Distribution Contingency 2. Implementation of Central Equipment Fund $ -0- --------- --------- Breakdown by Account: Gas - Vehicles Diesel Fuel RIM Supplies-Vehicles Insurance-Vehicles RIM Labor-Vehicles Rental of City Equip. Total Water Fund $ -0- I SEWER FUND AMENDMENTS ====================== Amendment Purpose Increase (Decrease) in Revenue 1. Implementation of 1993 Wage and Salary Plan...... $ -0- --------- --------- " ) Breakdown by Function: collection Contingency 2. Implementation of Central Equipment Fund Breakdown by Account: Gas - Vehicles Diesel Fuel RIM Supplies-Vehicles Insurance-Vehicles RIM Labor-Vehicles Rental of City Equip. --------- --------- $ -0- Total Sewer Fund $ -0- ========= Increase (Decrease) in Expenditures $ -0- --------- --------- 6,055 (6,055) $ -0- --------- --------- (650) (1,000) (2,000) (225) (1,500) 5,375 $ -0- Increase (Decrease) in Expenditures $ -0- --------- --------- 1,216 (1,216) $ -0- --------- --------- (950) (570) (2,000) (1,460) (2,500) 7,480 $ -0- @\" "'2;-,~, ~~; ;~ , ~ rj\j ~ ,'" J '~""'~::'~.'(~::;~"" CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. Non-Discussion Item DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT January 19, 1993 Engineering ~ APP~~~\) FOR I,J~ ITEM Accept Kob's 1st NO. Addition streets <<3. BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving the street construction for Kob's First Addition as being developed by Kenneth M. & Beverly A. Kobs in Section 8, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. I The street construction is nearly complete and it is recommended to approve the improvements. By approving the resolution the development contract escrow will be reduced. $2,200 plus interest will be returned. $1,200 will remain in escrow for some minor grading, seeding, street maintenance and erosion control. The development contract should remain in place until such time all items have been completed and the developer makes a request to release the remaining escrow. Maintenance bonds from the contractor are in place and will expire June 10, 1993. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY ) TO SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANORA STATE OF MINNESOTA J RES. NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL STREET CONSTRUCTION FOR STREET AND STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION FOR KOB'S FIRST ADDITION AS BEING DEVELOPED BY KENNETH M. & BEVERLY A. KOBS IN SECTION 8-32-24. WHEREAS, the developer has completed the rural residential street construction consistent to the Standard Specifications for Rural Residential Street Construction for 5 Ton Bituminous Surface on 2.5 Acre Lot Development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the final street construction of Kob's First Addition contingent upon the following: 1. That the 1 year maintenance bonds include all improvements made but not limited to, the following: subgrade, Class V, bituminous, storm sewers, topsoil, seeding, etc. are in place until June 10, 1993. Adopted by the City Council of the city of Andover this 19th day of January , 19 93. \ I CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk \ J CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE January 19, 1993 AGENDA SECTION NO. N D . . It on- ~scuss~on em ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Admin. Accept Easement/Lot 1, Block 5, Meadows of BY: Jim Schrantz The City Council is requested to accept the attached easement on Lot 1, Block 5, The Meadows of Round Lake. This is a street and utility easement across the front of the lot. The street was modified after the plat was filed due to a MSA change in the plans. This has all been worked out with the developer and his engineers many months ago. We are finishing up the paper work. Attached: Nedegaard Letter Easement MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY I NEDEGAARD CU8TOM IfOME8 1814 NORTH DALE BLVD. COON RAPIDS, MN S5448 (612) 757-2926 FAX 757-0649 " December 15, 1992 Ms. Theresa Haeg Chicago Title 3200 Main street Coon Rapids, MN 55448 RE: Lot 1, Block 5, The Meadows of Round Lake Dear Theresa: It is my understanding that you are going to be conducting the closing on the above parcel for Dean Zaudtke on December 21, 1992 at 10: 30 a.m. Enclosed you will find a Quit Claim Deed from the buyers to the City of Andover. This Quit Claim Deed grants to the City a utility easement extending twenty feet back from the front lot line. I This easement is being provided at the request of the City of Andover. I have been advised that the City is issuing a certificate of occupancy conditioned upon the Hake's executing this Quit Claim Deed at the time of closing. Upon the Hake's executing this Quit Claim Deed, I would appreciate it if you would forward it directly onto the City of Andover, attention Todd Haas, 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW Andover 55303. If you should need any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. f\~1 y yours, ~id ~. ewman Vice President DPNjja /1107 ELDORADo sr Enclosure cc: Todd Haas I (Oll"~ ..0....000 o..o.r"",,,1' A DIVISION OF NEDEGAARD CONS1RUCTION COMPANY, INC. lie. NO. 0002068 ~@ I Quit Claim Deed Individual to Corporation " No delinquent taxes and transfer entered: certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. , 19 County AUditor by Deputy STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Date: December d9 , 1992 FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, James H. Hake, Jr. and LuAnn H. Hake, husband and wife, Grantors, hereby convey and quitclaim to the " city of Andover, a municipality under the laws of Minnesota, Grantee, J real property in Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: An easement for street and utility purposes over the Southeasterly 10 feet of the Northwesterly 20 feet of Lot 1, Block 5, THE MEADOWS OF ROUND LAKE, except the Northeasterly 5 feet thereof and also except the Southwesterly 5 feet thereof. together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, subject to the following exceptions: " I .I ) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of December, 1992 by James M. Hake, husband and wife, Grantors. .r-'\.^\/~..A~...*",^\...~";,,,\,;\ .;. /11..-\ ::.. t).,~,'A ~\i'}, '."\..~~\ ~ -:-" (,; -<0,;'>, r-::: q;.::" , ~~ H".-....,:.. . ,. J. " o;.'{ :-r~ :.~. '-' .....~f"' 0. ""'_~ " ~ ii.jfiD .,::::~ry:;;~~:~~~ :i~;~~sct: ~ <1. ,...-.::~..... .1:./ '..on,ll",:,,-.,!";,' .: .,....1 ~'~ 10.'31/:,,5 ..~ VV'V"Y YV:1-""'o/ \'1 '.,/\/,; ?',_. ,:,"";'r.'.Jl'_'f\~"':II\"'f"I.'''_-'JVV~ ~ ,,'. I " -. v ... .." y '''I -" V " H~' and LuAnn H. N~dC~/ Tax Statements for the real property described in this instrument should be sent to: Grantee: city of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard Andover, Minnesota 55304 , ) THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Nedegaard Construction Company, Inc. 1814 Northdale Boulevard Coon Rapids, MN 55448 \ I @\) \ ~r\.,~ I '~ ,,_"",/' J ...~.!:'~~.' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. . Non-D1scussion Item DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT January 19, 1993 ITEM Approve Speed Limitl NO. Univ. Ave. North of ':>,s". , Engineering BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to approve the resolution which allows the speed limit to be posted at 40 MPH along University Avenue Extension from Constance Boulevard (County Road 60) and 166th Avenue NW. The speed limits are authorized contingent upon curves and hazards being signed with the appropriate advance curve or warning signs including appropriate speed advisory plates. warning signs and speed signs shall be in accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The authorization from the Office of Traffic Engineering will be out to the City within a few days. This is a joint speed limit with the City of Ham Lake. i COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY , TO ) SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. I A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 40 MPH SPEED LIMIT ALONG UNIVERSITY AVENUE EXTENSION BETWEEN CONSTANCE BOULEVARD (COUNTY ROAD 60) AND 166TH AVENUE NW IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER. WHEREAS, 40 MPH speed limit signs contingent upon curves and hazards being signed in accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices~ and WHEREAS, MNDOT has given authorization to lower the speed limit to 40 MPH~ and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the 40 MPH speed limit be posted along University Avenue Extension between Constance Boulevard (County Road 60) and 166th Avenue NW. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 19th day of January , 19 93. CITY OF ANDOVER " / ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk \ ) " ..f~ ~ -liPtivet$/"gJ A~ E;.t J,~~ Minnesota Department of Transportation ~",j~"~ p~ ~ 1M rt-h. A-v~; Metropolitan District Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 Reply to 5801 Duluth Street Golden Valley, MN SS422 591-4618 Telephone No. f(~\~NE~So'4 \ :xl t: .-\ It" ~1t ~~ \ 'l' OF T?<\>." / December 3, 1992 R.. E C t-fVHt n , r DEe 9 ~99~U ,- Doris A. Nivala, Clerk City of Ham Lake 15544 Central Avenue NE Ham Lake, Minnesota 55304 Re: Speed Zoning - City of Ham Lake University Avenue NE, 3rd Street NE CITY OF ANDOVER Dear Ms. Nivala: '\ / A speed zoning study has been completed for the above referenced roads as requestecr-- in Ham Lake City Council Resolution No. 92-74 and your November 9 letter. Based on the study results and as discussed with you previously, we have recommended authorization of the following speed limit for the two streets: 40 mph - between Constance Boulevard (County Road 60) and Crosstown Boulevard (County State Aid Highway 18) This recommendation is currently being reviewed by our office of traffic engineering in St. Paul which will make the final speed limit determination. As soon as the review has been completed, you will be informed of their decision. Before implementing any approved speed limits, the road should be reviewed to ensure all needed signing is in place, in good condition, visible, and in conformance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Particular attention should be given to warning and advisory speed signing for spot locations where the speed limit can't be safely maintained. When making the review, we suggest you consider installation of STOP AHEAD signs in advance of all STOP signs and moving the in place REVERSE CURVE sign for southbound traffic from just north of to just south of 167th Lane. Also, TURN signs should be considered for the curve just south of Crosstown Boulevard and we would suggest the first SPEED LIMIT 40 sign for southbound traffic be located just south of this curve. " / <-~ ~MINNESOTA ~ 1990 An Equal Opportunity Employer Doris Nivala December 3, 1992 Page 2 " I have enclosed some general information concerning speed limits which you might find to be helpful in understanding why we have recommended increasing the existing 30 mph speed limit on 3rd Street. If there are questions concerning either the information or our recommendations, please contact Ed Brown (591-4617) at the above Duluth Street address. Sincerely, .. . ~;~~7A!l.k<t<. ~k~u'z Sue Scharenbroich Division Traffic Engineer SS:pl:EB / cc: Todd Haas - City of Andover "'. / "- ) @\" r;\' ';'i\ '. ,. :0", ;1 ., \!\'. /)1;; I ~ ~. -'v~~~,.,-.",..., "'''_~I'' ," CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE January 19, 1993 ITEM Approve Revised Grading N,.. PlanlPheasant Meadows BY: Andover Review Committee AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT NO. Non-Discussion Item The City Council is requested to review and approve the revised grading and drainage plan for pheasant Meadows. The developer has requested a change to allow the minimum basement floor for Lot 4 & 6, Block 1 to be lowered. The Andover Review Committee has reviewed the revised grading and drainage plan and is recommending approval. The grading and drainage plan is available in the Engineering Office. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY :' TO SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING PHEASANT MEADOWS HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. THE REVISED GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN OF AS BEING DEVELOPED BY IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 32, WHEREAS, the Andover Review Committee has reviewed the revised grading and drainage plan~ and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 090-92 continues to be in force regarding the preliminary plat~ and WHEREAS, the City Council approves the revised grading and drainage plan with a revision date of December 17, 1992 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the revised grading and drainage plan. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 19th day of January , 19 93. CITY OF ANDOVER I ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria volk - City Clerk ~ / -.......... I--~--~ -- '- .- - - I ~7 I - - - - c= -=-_ --- 7- _----1\ , \ ~ -+--J t\ ~ Q) /" \i~ ~()~ \ ~ ~ / Cl. / I \~ (J) I ' ~ ,> ~ !~ >- I ~ 0 IS J '-.... J 5 ,J ;iJ~\\ ~ I I Iii <n'l I ~ I J ~ \ r- ,\ ) ~L \\ en \ \ }/- f \ \ . 904 . J \ \ . . . .. . .. .. .. .. .. rie x--\' \ \ p___~--_-..a....~-l..~.... ......... ..../__...._ ___ I I \ -~---:----:--~----~---)- --- ! - \. I J { I ./ \ ) - - - -1 " - - x~ " / '- I '::----' .0 o. 0lX) 010 ~Ol 1Il~ -=- BLO K '1-- ~fi.Il '6 ~e:: , 1Il<( L_ .0 , .I o ,--- - - o "':0 0"; 010 ~Ol 1Il~ ale" '5 1 {f- " J CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE January 19, 1993 ITEM Approve Plans & Specsl NO. 92-20;Woodland Creek 3rd BY: ~ Todd J. Haas AGENDA SECTION NO. Non-Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving final plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for Project 92-20, Woodland Creek 3rd Addition for streets and storm drain construction. The sanitary sewer and watermain construction was approved under a change order with Project 91-27, The Meadows of Round Lake. The bid opening is scheduled for Friday, February 12, 1993 at 10:00 AM. The plans and specifications are available in the Engineering Office for review. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY ; CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANORA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 92-20, WOODLAND CREEK 3RD ADDITION FOR STREETS AND STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 191-92, adopted by the City Council on the 6th day of October , 19 92 , TKDA has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 92-20 for STREETS AND STORM DRAIN construction; and WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications the City Council for their review on the 19th January , 19 93 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to hereby approve the Final plans and Specifications . were presented to day of BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids to be opened at 10:00 AM Friday, February 12 , 19~ at the Andover City Hall. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 19th day of January , 19~, with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmen voting against same whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION , ) DATE January 19, 1993 AGENDA SECTION . NO. Non-Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering ~ ~JM Accept PetitionlEcho .;;6'. Ridge/92-29 BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring adequacy of petition and ordering preparation of feasibility report for the improvement of sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm drains, Project 92-29, in the Echo Ridge area. MOTION BY \ TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. I MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STREET AND STORM DRAINS PROJECT NO. 92-29 , IN THE ECHO RIDGE AREA. WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition, dated December 30, 1992 , requesting the construction of improvements; and WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to represent the signatures of 100% of the affected property owners requesting such improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover that: 1. The petition is hereby declared to be 100% of owners of property affected, thereby making the petition unanimous. 2. Escrow amount for feasibility report is $1,000.00 , / 3. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to TKDA and they are instructed to provide the City Councll with a feasibility report. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the City Council at a Regular Meeting this 19th day of January 1993 , with Councilmen voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk \ _J ;;; --, 7.~-.'. -'-77 .0_ - -..... . -~.... ,. .. ~; . TONY EMMERICH HOMES ) " December 28, 1992 R'~-:- E C Ell{E--"- , / DEC ~~911D ,- James E. Schrantz City Engineer City of Andover 1585 Crosstown Boulevard Andover, MN 55304 CITY OF P,NDOVER RE: PROPOSED ECHO RIDGE SUBDIVISION Dear Mr. Schrantz: Tony Emmerich Construction, Inc. does hereby petition for improvements by the construction of water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and streets with concrete curb and gutter with the costs of improvement to be assessed against the benefiting property which is described as: " ECHO RIDGE / Said petition is unanimous and the public hearing may be waived, (OPTIONAL) . We request that a feasibility report be prepared as soon as possible. We have enclosed a check for $1,000.00 for the feasibility report expenses. (THE WILL BE CREDITED TOWARD 15% IMPROVEMENT ESCROW). , J 2619 Coon Rapids Blvd., Suite 101, Coon Rapids, MN 55433 CITY OF ANDOVER \ I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION January 19, 1993 DATE AGENDA SECTION NO. . . Non-D~scuss~on Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENpA ~ ~ ITEM Approve Revised Grading NO. Hidden Creek East 5th q. lanl BY: Andover Review Committee The City Council is requested to review and approve the revised grading and drainage plan for Hidden Creek East 5th Addition as requested by Good Value Homes, Inc. The developer has requested to excavate approximately a 7000 foot square area that will be for mitigation for a development in the City of Blaine. Under the current Wetland Conservation Act this may be allowed and will be contingent upon approval of the Coon Creek Watershed District. The CCWD is designated as the LGU. The Andover Review Committee has reviewed the revised grading and drainage plan and is recommending approval. Note: ultimately the City most likely will need to construct the existing pond to a much larger pond due to the large amount of runoff from 136th Avenue NW (known as Commercial Boulevard) and the adjacent commerical properties. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY ) TO SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA \ , I RES. NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REVISED HIDDEN CREEK EAST 5TH ADDITION GOOD VALUE HOMES, INC. RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN OF AS BEING DEVELOPED BY IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 32, WHEREAS, the Andover Review Committee has reviewed the revised grading and drainage plan; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 167-86 continues to be in force regarding the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the City Council approves the revised grading and drainage plan with a revision date of January 19, 1993 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the revised grading and drainage plan. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 19th day of January , 19 93. CITY OF ANDOVER I ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk \ ) " p" 1 (0-.'') ,:e'-"", r:'-l \:j +.,-",,1 1"..). .1,,:.,.1 .-r\:-.'.' ~~-"'.' " ~ . -'.. "='1 . ~ ",...., ~ ,.. -.,. .">, 'I"~ /,.\ 1. t.) :::: I . "",'.:...l;._ _..I _.. ~...;_:.;..:I J.,:j (~}X~Y~Cf~~~:,f3 .. ) Date: December 29, 1992 To: Todd Haas From: John Peterson Re: Hidden Creek East Wetland Mitigation , i The attached drawing shows the area we would like to use as wetland mitigation. We would like to enlarge the existing pond in the spring of 1993. We understand that the Coon Creek Watershed would also be involved in the process. Please have this proposal considered by the appropriate people. " / GOOD VALUE HOMES. INC. . Registered Builder' 1460 93rd Lane N.E.. Blaine. MN 55434-4396 . Phone: (612) 780-5510 \ / s:: a l-t .0. tn t..'1 ~ ..... .......... ----------.... ---- \ ,. " , ..... "- ...... ." .............g . (j-........ ~......... , '" .... "- ...."-f:::....~~d5-: ------ ...' - -------- ,- {2Evf~~P :r"!NIAIIJ2.v /0 . .-. / .,,1193 /. 'I j JI :dl >: I ,>: ) : loi '":.,' ::, Q:: '\)! ~ ; ! r:::l ... . ::-' Z - o ~ ::c E-- ~ ("'"\ \ I i ,........., ~ ~ ....,:..1: hi'. I.::~ ._' \")~...CC' it ~......:..!.._- .~, . __ . /I" I:;. ------ .... ~ C . ~ ~ . :;-- ." Ol~ ~e .- -0 ~e c ~ 8: II l .' Ii;, i'Qf J~:= lir: ..1 ~i.i :..~, !~lj-: .!.. ~ -~ ~ p . f; i ! . ~~ ! ~~; ~ ;:6 f HI ; . . " - '" " < ; I - . . I 1,_ .'. =,j= ii:! u 1~.""'4 :;.=::~::..... -- -- ..\~ h~ '" i tt7~ '" i~ . , ~~i": I .iE : ~I ~~1~-~ ~ , ) -0.;".- _.. -10111.. .. .. -_'!!'.!- ;--LZC<<.ili .. .. ~ ~_--II!l:!f.. J r--~---1 ~ ~ ~___.l"l .. ~ co ~~ ~...: .~ i~ '... ~ ..- I~ .-.P. ..- 'Q. i .. . i. -~ l..:c. ~;: ~t '-"" "'" ." ~;C ;:: ~6 ;1 -- S!:.: "! .. ... t~ ~~i ~. Ii ~ :n ~.... '..,..,-- " ...,. .'; ~~-''' \.. ~~,,_. N .. . N o N ~:1 ~::;.. !! ~!~ !: t I'; :!! :: ,.. . . .: .":~.~ ~.' ~.. "" ~.. on .i I ~ ~ l .. .. !:: .1 It: mr ,(""-' " . .' ,." ~~ ..-.! <<. :; ~; .011 I". l~ .d) 1>- ,III ,. I~ i.. I~ .. 0- I: 11; I I ! i I "1 ..1 I I 1 i I I \,1 -:'. ; ~~ - f'~p l=-r",,-<-' ~.A- 4.7 AL. 3.4 L4c... fl. .... " " "- 'h.. " " , , \ \ \4 t \:::lOO ) 1- '\ .''1C,I- ...........;...~~.. I I ._~,.~ - ';~. ~ ~\ 71111- ..... - "-~ -~ I f"s~("~ p4l1J. .w Bonestroo Rosene -- 1\11 Anderlik & ) Associates Engineers & Architects " December 28, 1992 City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Attention: Mr. James E. Schrantz City Administrator Otto G. Bonestroo. P.E. Robert W. Rosene, P.E.. Joseph C. Anderlilc, P.E. Marvin l. Sorvala. P.E. Richard E. Turner, PE. Glenn R. Cook. P.E. Thomas E. Noyes. PE. Robert G. Schunlcht PE. Susan M. Eberlin, c.PA. -Senior Consultant Havvard A. Sanfon:t, PE. KeiCh A. Gordon. PE. Robert R. prefferle. PE. Richard W. Foster, PE David Q. loslcma, PE. Robert C. Russek. A.lA Jerry A. Bourdon. PE. Mark A. Hanson. PE. Michael I Raurmann. P.E. Ted K. Field, P.E. Thomas R. Anderson, AlA. Donald C. Burgardt. PE. Thomas E. Angus. PE. rsmaef Martinez. P.E. Re: 159th Lane N.W., Swallow Street & Quinn Street Street Improvements, Project 91-10 Our File 17150 Dear Jim: \ ) Michael P Rau, P.E. .-.gnes M. Ring, A.I.C.P Thomas W. Pererson. PE. Michael C. LynCh. PE. James R. Maland, PE. Jerry D. Pertzsch, P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson, PE. Mark R. Rolfs. PE. Mark A. SeiP. P:E. Gary W. Marien. P:E Daniel J. Edgerton. P:E. Daryl K. Kirschenman. P:E. Philip J. CaS\Nell. P:E. Mark D. Wallis. P:E. Miles B. Jensen. PE. L. Phillip Gravel Ill, P:E. Karen L. Wiemeri. PE. Gary D. Kristofirz. P.E. F. Todd Foster. P.E. Keith R. Yapp. PE. Shawn O. Gustafson, P.E. Cecilia Olivier. PE. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawe/sky Harlan M. Olson James F. Engelhardt o EC El'V E'--' 811 eEe 2 91992 il -,-- CITY OF ANDOVER Enclosed please fmd three (3) signed copies of the 2nd and Final Request for Payment for the above referenced project. The project overran the original contract amount by $1,131.61 or 1.2 %. The principle reason for the overrun is minor variations in plan quantities as compared to actual constructed quantities. TItis work has been satisfactorily completed and we recommend the City Council accept the project and make fmal payment. If you have any questions please contact me. Yours very truly, ~' ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Harlan M. Olson HMO:lk Enclosures / 2335 West HIghway 36. St. Paul. MInnesota 55113.612-636-4600 JI1J BonestroQ Owner City of Andover, 1685 Crosstown Blvd NW, Andover, MN 55304 Date November 25, J 992 -=- Rosene 1\J1 AnderlUc & For Period Oetober31,1991to November 25, 1992 Request No. 2 & Final Associates l.~..",,"chItecU Contractor Central Landscaping, 13655 Lake Drive, Forest Lake, MN 55025 Sf. 'MIl. ~ \ I REQUI~"T FOR PAYMENT 159th Lane NW, Swallow Street & Quinn Street Street Improvements Project No. 91-10 File No. 17150 SUMMARY I Original Contract Amount $ 93,298.00 2 Change Order - Addition 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand $ $ II AMOUNT DUE TIllS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 2 & Final $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 93,298.00 9~,429.61 0.00 94,429.61 0.00 94,429.61 79,879.61 14,550.00 7 Amount Earned 8 Less Retainage 9 Sub-Total '10 Less Amount Paid Previously / Approved by Contractor: CENTRAL LANDSCAPING, INC. Approved by Owner: CfIY OF ANDOVER, MN ~# /(,?z;?~ ~ Specified Contract Completion Date: NOVEMBER 15, 1991 Date: ) t7t50.RFI' J 17150.RFP RP-l PRomcr PAYMENT STATIlS Owner Project ) Project No. FileNo. Contractor City of Andover 159th Lane NW, Swallow Street & Quinn Street Street Improvements 91-10 17150 Central Landscaping, Inc. \ \ CHANGE ORDERS No. Date 2 3 Total Change Ordcrs - Add No. , PAYMENT SUMMARY Period Start 10-31-91 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Paymcnt to Datc Retainage, Payment No. Total Value Completed \ I 17150.RFP 10-31-91 11-25-92 2 & Final Payment $79,879.61 14,550.00 Retainage $4,204.19 0.00 $94,429.61 0.00 $94,429.61 Original Contract Change Ordcrs Rcvised Contract RP-2 " Amount Complcted $84,083.80 94,429.61 $93,298.00 0.00 $93,298.00 CITY OF ANDOVER ) REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE January 19, 1993 AGENDA SECTION NO. Non-Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Admin. INTEM Approve Final payment/91 101 ~O. 159th Ln, Swallow, Quin BY: ~O. Jim Schrantz The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting work and directing final payment for Project 91-10, 159th Lane, Swallow Street and Quinn Street. The final payment is $14,550. The project overran the original contract amount by $1,131.61 or 1.2% . The project was assessed November 5, 1991. The final contract is less than the estimated amount used in the assessment. \ / Attached: Resolution Recommendation Letter/BRA Final Estimate MOTION BY COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY \ TO J ) / ) '\ ) CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilman to adopt the following: WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Andover on September 16 , 19 91 , Central Landscaping Inc. of Forest Lake, MN has satisfactorily completed the construction in accordance with such contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, Minnesota that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full. MOTION seconded by Councilman and adopted by the 19th day City Council at a meeting this regular of , 19 93 , with Councilmen January voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen voting against, whereupon said resolution was passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk @\,._'\." ~\\ \'\ '1 ;. \'~ "if . '.~.,. : " ..~.:;'I' _ J '_...;..,,?:,-:;.$';~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE January 19, 1993 ITEM Approve Change Order #1 NO. 92-4/Winslow Hills 2nd I. BY: Jim Schrantz AGENDA SECTION NO. Non-Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Admin. The City Council is requested to approve the Contract Change Order #1, Project 92-4, Winslow Hills 2nd Addition in the amount of $11,835.00. The Contract Change Order is attached. The Contract Change Order items were mainly caused by a change in a intersection alignment and some curb and gutter and catch basin mis-alignment that needed to be changed. I recommend approval. MOTION BY \ TO I COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY ) TKDA TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 1500 MERITOR TOWER 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL. MINNESQTA55101-21" PHONE:61=-W>O FAX:612/2ll2.oo83 December 28, 1992 Re: Winslow Hills 2nd Addition City Project 92-4 ~dover,~esota Commission No. 10127 CITY 0 ---. F ANDOVER Kenko, Inc. 1694-91st Avenue NE Minneapolis, Minnesota 55434 Gentlemen: Enclosed please fmd Change Order No.1 for the above referenced project in the amount of $11,835.00. Please sign all copies where indicated and return all copies to this office. If there are any questions, please contact me. \ ) Siricere1y, ~I! Thomas A. Syfko, P.E. TAS:j Enclosures cc: Jim Schrantz, City of ~dover I CHANGE ORDER " J TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED Engineers-Architects-Planners Andover, MN December 23. 19~ Corom. No. 10127 To Kenko. Inc. for winslow Hills 2nd Addition (92-41 for City of Andovp.r. ~nn~~cta Change Order No. 1 You are hereby directed to make the following change to your contract dated June 16. , 19~. The change and the work affected thereby is subject to all contract stipulations and covenants. This Change Order will (increase) (c;!Q\;u;QaeQ) (Fl." ,L ;Ie) the contract sum by E1"ven Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty-five and - - - no/100 Dollars ($ 11.835.00 ). 1. Remove and Reinstall Existing Hydrant, Tee and Gate Valve 2. Insulate between Watermain and StODn Sewer 149th Lane \ 3. Excavate Existing 12" Sanitary Sewer on 150th Lane and Extend RCP Line short of Intersection 4.. Adjust Manhole 3-1 and Drop Tee Section due to Conflict with Existing StODn Sewer 5. Remove 36" Apron and Extend StODn Sewer to the South 6. Reconstruct Existing StODn Sewer Manhole on 149th Lane , 7. Install Fence Posts at Manholes and Curb Line +$ 814.85 +$ 25.39 +$ 1,848.03 +$ 246.75 +$ 227.96 +$ 348.92 +$ 662.01 8. Replace Concrete Curb and Gutt~r damaged by Bui1d~=s +$ 690.00 9. Control Discrepancy: Original Control not consistent with Property Irons: A. Jackhammer and Remove 117 LF,Concrete Curb and Gutter B. Remove 48" Diameter Catch Basin-Manhole and Replace with 72- Diameter C. Haul Out Manhole Sections and Curb & Gutter D. Replace Concrete Curb & Gutter TOTAL ,. . ~ ... l'J.c.;' :\ ~ +$ 569.22 +$ 3,394.55 +$ 316.32 +$ 2.691.00 +$11,835.00 ".... r "n ) Amount of Original Contract $ Additions approved to date (Nos. $ Deductions approved to date (Nos. $ Contract amount to date $ Amount of this Change Order (Add) (b'e8tist) (lT8~ EihaRged) $ Revised Contract Amount $ 528.229 36 0.00 0.00 528.229.36 +11.835.00 540.064.36 Owner TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCI TES, INCORPORATED By By Approved CITY OF ANDOVER. MN Date Approved KENKO. INC. White - Owner* pink - Contractor* Contractor By Date \ ) .,; .~. '.',1' ~~_.~ ' @\- -~-< .P .)~ \ \ fA) ) '--, ""~:::7-:;":~~'~"-' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. Non-Discussion Item DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering January 19, 1993 ITEM Release Escrowl NO. Holmberg Addition S.P . BY: Todd J. Haas ~ APPRO~.~ ED,/ OR AGEQ&6 By! The City Council is requested to release all remalnlng escrows that have to do with engineering, attorney, signs, etc, plus interest to Wayne Holmberg, developer of Holmberg Addition. The project is complete. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION January 19, 1993 DATE ITEM Approve Change Order #2/ ~~. 92-2/Weybridge 2nd BY: Jim Schrantz AGENDA SECTION NO. . . Non-D~scuss~on Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Admin. The City Council is requested to approve the Contract Change Order #2, Project 92-2, Weybridge 2nd Addition. The Contract Change Order includes placing Class V aggregate base on the sanitary sewer service road. This service road is used for maintenance access. We also requested a water service be added to the end of Vale Street NW so the contractor could flush the last section of watermain. I recommend approval. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY .TO SECOND BY JAN 13 '93 09:40 TKDA, INC. 292-0083 P.2 , )TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS TO~TZ, KINQ,IlUVA~~. AND!R'OH AND "'"ocrATES, IHCORPOR"retl , 500 IIERlTOR TOWEll ...... OI!DAR 8'n1EET SAINT PM/\., M'HNs;aOTAIS10'oI1~ PHONIl'.'1lm2-44QO FAX:5121282-OOU January 11, 1993 Mr. James Schrantz City Administrator 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, Milmesota 55304 Re: Weybridge Utility and Street Improvements City Project 92.2 Andover, Minnesota Commission No. 10102 Dear Mr. Schrantz: Enclosed please f"md Change Order No.2 for the subject project in the amount of $4,296.22. This change order is sent to you for your review and City Councll approval. If you have any questions, please call Sincerely, :a~~ Thomas A. Syfk:o, P.E. T AS/mha Enclosure ,.', /. JAN / ~. 13 '93 09:41 TKDA, INC. '..,' 292-0083 P.3 j' ,\ .- , , CHANGT. ORDER \ ~OLT%, KING, DUVALL, ~~RSON .. AN%) ASSOCIATES, :INCORPOAATED En~ineera-~chiteeta-Plannera Andove:l:, MN lTl:lntJ"-~V 4 19-1l Comm. No. ~n1n'- Change Order No. 2 ~o M~n~ w~~~@~ ?x~~v~~inn fo:!: W~ybrid~e IQ2-2\ for ~n~ov~r ~nn~An~~ ~ou are hereby directed to make the follow!ngcbange to your contraoedated May 19. , 19~. Tbe chaoge.and tbe work .flected thereby is subjeot to 811 oontraot stipulations and OOYenants. This Change Orde:!: will (inorease) (~le.6AS.) (ao; G~aRge) the oontraot sum by Four Thou8an~ Two Hundr~d ~in~tY-RiY Rnd 22/100. Dollars ($ 42Q6.22 ). The following is extra work performed by the contractor: 1. Aggregate aase, Class 5 placed on Sanitary Sewer Service aoad: 302.3 TN 8 $11.40/Ton $3,446.22 \ ) 2. en Core Drill in MR 5-1 1.0 LS @ $400.00 $ 400.00 3. aemobi1ization to Add ~.ter Service for ~luahing on Vale Bt:eet 1. 0 LB 9 $450.00 $ 4!\O 00 NET CHANG! - (Add) $4,296.22 Amount o~ O:iginal Contract $ Additions approved to date (Nos. 1 $ Deductions approved to date (NO$. $ Contract amount to data $ Atnount of this Change Orde: (Add) ~edl1l.tt) oW*" ElhaR!fea). $ Reviaed Cont:aot Amount $ 393.202.77 *28.52Q 40 o 00 421.732.17 ;-4.29S '-2 42S 028.39 By: Owner ~OLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIA ES, INCORPORATED" (). By Approved CITY OF ANnOV~R MN Date Approved HANK WEln~MA ~XCAV~TrNG .J TJA , J I D Contraotor Byl , VLf....6 ~. ~J~J -./-'f;"15 O!l.te White - Ownerll Pink - Contractor* I; , **************************************************************** *<<************************************************************~* .. ** ..<< *'" <<<< .* <<<< .* <<<< *. <<'" .* :: _ WHAT'S_-1iAEPENI_NG/iA? :: <<lC *. <<'" ** ..'" **. <<<< January 19, 1993 ** <<'" ** ..'" *. :: - Andover's newsletter was rated the worst in the :: "," County - Not for content but in how it is ** :: presented-=-part of the Andover Express :: :: Newspaper. The Anoka County Union stated that :: ",'" we are loosing readers because we are part of ** :: the Express. Are we?? I don't know. :: ",'" ** :: - Conferences - In the past Staff has not attended :: :: a national conference - but Daryl has attended :: <<'" in the past and believes-rt to be worthwhile. ** :: Attached is a memo from Daryl explaining the :: ",'" conference and his proposed cost sharing. .* ",'" ** ~~ .. :: - Group 28 will be starting work on the WDE site :: ",'" soon. They have scheduled a pre-construction ** :: meeting for the 20th of January for the cap :: ..'" work. I should be receiving a letter on it ** ojICiC .. ",'" soon. ** <<'" ** ..'" .* <<'" - primary Election for County Commissioner .* :: District 5 is February 9, 1993 and the General :: ",'" Election is March 2, 1993. .* ",'" .* <<'" ** ..'" THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF .* :: EIDELWEISS STREET NW access Wetland 610W is :: :: scheduled for February 9, 1993 at 10:00 AM in :: ..'" the City Council chambers. If the Council plans .. :: to speak, please fill out the form attached to :: ..<< the notice in the front of the packet (notice .* ..'" ** ..'" from the Attorney Generals Office). ** ..'" ** <<'" .* <<'" We (Bill Hawkins, John Davidson, Ted Frostman .* .:: from STS and myself) _plan to meet at 9:30 AM :: <<'" January 19, 1993 to discuss the presentation to ** ..'" .* ..'" be made at the hearing. .. <<<< .* <<.. .. <<'" I have contacted Lee Warneka, the president of .* :: the Andover Neighborhooa Preservation :: ..'" Association and sent Notice of Appearance forms *. ::. which art! due by January 26, 1993. ::: <<'" .. <<'" .. ..<< CONTINUED *'" ..'" .* <<<< .. ..'" .. . ..'" .. .... .. <<:********************************~*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We will be presenting information that has been previously prepared. The city's costs will be for Bill's, John's and Ted's time. We welcome all the ideas and help from the city council that you can provide - your appearance will add to the credibility of our presentations. I have been told that Mrs. Sonsteby will be opposing the crossing because she believes it will prevent her from getting a connection to *116 (Bunker Lake Boulevard) from her high ground that runs between 143rd and Woodbine and the curve on Bunker Lake Boulevard just east of the city's proposed crossing. - Staff will be meeting with a representative from ASATI (Air structure American Technology, Inc.) who would like to construct a domed complex soccer facility in Andover on park property. -, C}\ CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 MEMORANDUM Mayor and council TO: COPIES TO: FROM: DATE: REFERENCE: Jim Daryl~i( January 12, 1993 G.F.O.A. 87th Annual Conference REQUEST The City council is requested to approve the registration for the Finance Director to attend the national conference of the Government Finance Officers Association in Vancouver, British Columbia, May 1st through May 5th. BACKGROUND The conference presented by the national G.F.O.A. provides an educational opportunity in several areas of financial administration designed to enhance daily operations and planning methods. Over 70 concurrent sessions and roundtable discussions will be available to chose from, covering topics in the areas of: Accounting and Financial Reporting Budgeting and Financial Planning Capital Financing and Debt Administration Cash Management and Investing Computers and Technology Financial and Performance Auditing Financial Management procurement Insurance and Risk Management Intergovernmental Relations Pensions and Employee Benefits The vendor exhibit hall will feature over 100 firms offering management and finance related products and services for state and local governments. v Conference Request Page 2 Ai COST AND FUNDING Airfare: Lodging: $250 $280 $295 $375 $78 to 108 per (paid by 1/29/93) (paid by 3/12/93) (after 3/12/93) or; or; Conference Registration Fee: night; 4 nights. Estimated Cost $859 to $1057 The 1993 budget has $355 for seminars planned for by the former Finance Director. with council's approval for attendance at this conference and the use of the $355 available in the Finance Department Budget, I am willing to provide my transportation to Vancouver and share half the cost of lodging. The conference registration is included in the list of claims under vendor number 282, Gov't Finance Officers Assoc. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. Non-Discussion Items DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Finance January 19i 1993 ITEM Receive December Daryl E. Sulande NO. Financial Statements BY: Finance Director \ REQUEST Correction to Item #21. The City Council is requested to replace page 4 of the preliminary December 1992 financial statements for the Sewer Fund with the corrected statement. The journal entry recording the transfer from the Sewer Connection Fund for $30,500.00 was erroneously posted twice. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY '^, CITY OF ANDOVIOF; YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES I-UK GENERAL. WATER AND SEWER FUNDS As of 31Dec92 RevisecJ Ye~;r to D~}t~ P~rcent~ge Budget Actual ~emaining SEW E R FUN 0 R t. Ii E NUl E; -. .- _. -~ .- - -. ... - - - ------------------- E;E'v!EJ: CHARGEE; nHiOREST 396.300.00 2.000.00 303.269.22 3.29i.3:) 23 ( 6L,) TRANSFER FROM SEWER CONN. FUND 30.500.00 80. L" 9 30.500.00 ~E_Fll~[)~: AN:~ ;:~lM8ll~SEM~NT~: TOTAL SEWER FUND REVENUE l,28. 800.00 338,922.80 20 -. _. -' - - - - .. - .. -' - - - - - - - - -" - - -- - -- _. - .. .. -.. .. - - - - - .- - - -. -- - - - - - - ~ t W t k ~ U N U E X PEN ~: E ~; -------------------- ----------------.---- C:Oll Lei"IClt.J Metropolitan Waste Control Other- Expenses ADMINIE,TRATJON ~) L 8 . 2 Lt 2 . 0 0 68,L,98.00 112.060.00 248.244.00 21,039.83 n.~13.1li o 69 30 TOTAL SEWER FUND EXPENSES 1,28.800.00 ::46,696.9-1 1 r: .....---.-------- ---------_.~- -----.-------- ------------ DATE: January 19, 1992 ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL Planning and zoning Minutes - December 22, 1992 Special City Council Minutes - January 5, 1993 Regular City Council Minutes - January 5, 1993 Special City Counc il Minutes - January 6, 1993 Park and Recreation Minutes - January 7, 1993 Memo from El Tinklenberg, City of Blaine - January 5, 1993 Letter from Jennifer Park, State of MN - January 6, 1993 productivity ReportlAnoka County Sheriff - November 1992 Building Report - December 1992 Letter from MN Dept. of Health Regarding Andover Public Works Letter from MN Dept. of Health Regarding Andover City Hall Lower Rum River WMO Information Coon Creek Watershed District Information Invitation from Family Life Mental Health Center What's Happening Schedule of Bills PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT AGENDA. THANK YOU. ~ -;0 cc /lcrj93 nECEIVED JAN 7 1993 CITY OF AND OVER " City of Blaine (612) 784-6700 FAX (612) 784-3844 9150 Central Avenue N.E.. Blaine. Minnesota 55434-3499 MEMORANDUM DATE; January 5, 1993 TO: Elected Officials and Cityffownship Managers/Administrators in Anoka County FROM: El Tinklenberg, Mayor, City of Blaine SUBJECT: Anoka County Local Government Officials Meeting We are convening the first meeting of the new year of our local governmental units. Elected .. officials, city managers, administrators and appropriate staff are invited to attend this meeting which will be on Wednesday, January 27,1993 at 7:00 p.ns. at the Majestic Oaks Country Club in Ham Lake. We have had very good feedback from our previous meeting and there have been requests for regular meetings and some form of organization of this group. It is our goal to have all local governmental units represented at this meeting and to begin to organize our efforts to deal with our issues and work together cooperatively to meet our many challenges. Tentative A~enda . Organizational Structure . Transportation Issues . State . F edera1 . LGA . Regional Governance . What to do about the Metropolitan Council . Legislative Issues for 1993 Session Bring concerns and issues with you as well as ideas and suggestions for the organization. Joe Strauss, Executive Director of the North Metro Mayors Association, will be attending to discuss that organization's goals, objectives and work program. There will be light refreshments and social time beginning at 6:30 p.m, Adjournment will be no later than 9:00 p.m. I hope all governmental units can be in attendance. . ET:mp .' ~C.- ,J u)& r' c_qJ )/11 STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Pl:BUC RE:iOCRCES SECTIO:-.l . q; ITE :011 ~:o L'FA" [TTE ROAD --T. P.-\LL. \1" 5~]~5 TELEPHO'\,[: IM2l 2..f:"-I'J":I' F.\CSI:\lIlL 16121 Z9:-l1~9 HUBERT H. HUMPHREY III ATJ'QRNEY GENERAL January 6, 1993 RECEIVED JAN 8 1993 CITY OF ANDOVER Re: In the Matter of the Application of City of Andover to Place Fill in Dehn's Pond (2- 610W) to Construct Eldorado Street N.W., Anoka County OAR Docket No. 2-2000-7247-2 To the Persons Named on the Attached Service Ust: Please find enclosed and served upon you the following described documents regarding the above-referenced matter: 1. Notice and Order for Hearing; 2. Notice of Appearance of the Department of Natural Resources; and 3. Form Notice of Appearance. Very truly yours, '/ . J/, /) / ~~ /') (~~ JENNIFER K. PARK Special Assistant Attorney General (612) 297-4393 Enclosures PARK.Al7 Equal Opportunity Employer ._~ SERVICE LIST * Kent Lokkesmoe, Director DNR-Division of Waters 500 Lafayette Road, Box 32 St. Paul, MN 55155-4032 U.S. Corps of Engineers General Regulatory Branch 1421 U.S. Post Off. & Custom House St. Paul, MN 55101-9808 *Rodney W. Sando, Commissioner Department of Natural Resources 500 Lafayette Road, Box 37 St. Paul, MN 55155-4037 * Charles W. Williams, Commissioner Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Attn: Assessment & Planning Sec. 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155 *John Fax DNR-Division of Waters 500 Lafayette Road, Box 32 St. Paul, MN 55155-4032 Chairperson, Env. Quality Board State Planning Agency 3rd Floor, Centennial Office Building 658 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55155 Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W. Aldover, MN 55304 t6im Schrantz City Administrator City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N. W. Andover, MN 55304 Jennirer K. Park Special. Assistant Attorney General Suite 200, 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MIl 55155 *Uoyd Knudson, Acting Reg. Hydro. DNR-Division of Waters 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 *Tom Hovey, Area Hydrologist DNR-Division of Waters 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 Anoka County SWCD 11931 Highway 65 N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 Anoka County Auditor's Office Anoka County Courthouse 325 East Main Anoka, MN 55303 Lower Rum River WMO 2015 1 st Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 Judge Bruce Campbell Office of Administrative Hearings 100 Washington Square, Suite 1700 Minneapolis, MN 55401-2138 *Dave Leuthe, Regional Administrator DNR-Metro Region 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 LEGAL NEWSPAPER Attn. Karen Segar Anolta Union ABC Nevspapers P.O. Box 99 Anoka, MIl 55303 William G. Hawkins, Esq. 299 Coon Rapids Blvd., Suite 101 Coon Rapids, MIl 55433 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Application of City of Andover to Place Fill in Dehn's Pond (2-61OW) to Construct Eldorado Street N.W., Anoka County NOTICE AND ORDER FOR HEARING OAR Docket No. 2-2000-7247-2 There will be a public hearing on the above matter on Tuesday, February 9, 1993, at 10:00 a.m., in the Council Chambers at the City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in Andover, Minnesota. The issue for the hearing is whether the City of Andover should receive a permit to construct Eldorado Street N.W. through Dehn's Pond, state-protected wetland 2-61OW. The relevant law and rules include, but need not be limited to, Minn. Stat. ch. 103G, with particular attention to sections 103G.245, 103G.301, 103G.311, 103G.315; Minn. Stat. sections 103A.201, 103A.202, and 116D.04, subd.6; and Minn Rules pts. 6115.0150 to 6115.0272. The hearing will be conducted before Administrative Law Judge Bruce D. Campbell, 100 Washington Square, Suite 1700, Minneapolis, MN 55401-2138, telephone (612) 341- 7602. The hearing is held pursuant to the Commissioner of Natural Resources' authority in Minn. Stat. ch. 103G and will be conducted pursuant to Minn. Stat. ch. 14 and Minn. Rules pts. 1400.5100 to 1400.8400, which provide for the parties' procedural rights, and which may be purchased from the Minnesota Bookstore, 117 University Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55155, telephone (612) 297-3700. Parties to the hearing must file notices of appearance within 20 days of the date of the service of this notice. Others wishing to be parties may petition to intervene under Minn. Rules pts. 1400.6200. The parties must bring to the hearing all documents, records, and witnesses they need to support their position. Subpoenas may be available to compel the : ' attendance of witnesses or the production of documents, pursuant to Minn. Rules pt. 1400.7000. The person to contact to discuss informal disposition of the case pursuant to Minn. Rules pt. 1400.5900 or discovery procedures pursuant to Minn. Rules pts. 1400.6700 and 1400.6800 of the above described rules is Jennifer K. Park, Special Assistant Attorney General, Suite 200, 520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155, telephone: (612) 297- 1075. All parties have the right to be represented by themselves, by legal counsel, or by a person of their choice if not otherwise prohibited as the unauthorized practice of law. All persons who are affected by the proposed project will have an opportunity to testify and introduce exhibits, whether parties or not. If non-public data is admitted into evidence, it may become public unless a party objects and asks for relief under Minn. Stat. 5 14.60, subd. 2. The failure of a party to appear at the hearing may result in issues set out herein being deemed proved, resulting in a permit denial. After the hearing, the administrative law judge will issue findings of fact, conclusions and recommendations to the Commissioner of Natural Resources, who will then issue a final decision. The Commissioner's final decision may then be appealed to the Minnesota Court of Appeals. Dated: 1- 'i - r..t J~"'J' ~$ ROD Y W. SANDO Commissioner Department of Natural Resources PARK,Al2 -2- I ./ STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES In the Matter of the Application of City of Andover to Place Fill in Dehn's Pond (2-610W) to Construct Eldorado Street N.W., Anoka County NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES OAR Docket No. 2-2000-7247-2 TO: Bruce D. Campbell, Administrative Law Judge, 100 Washington Square, Suite 1700, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-2138 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned intends to appear at the hearing in the above matter to be held on February 9, 1993 at 10:00 a.ill., in the Council Chambers at the City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in Andover, Minnesota. The hearing in the matter has been ordered by the Department of Natural Resources. The information required by Minn. Rules p1. 1400.5700 concerning the party filing this notice is as follows: Party's name: DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Party's current address: 500 Lafayette Road S1. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Party's telephone no.: Name of party's attorney or other representative: (612) 296-4800 JENNIFER K PARK Special Assistant Attorney General , " Address: Suite 200, 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Telephone: (612) 297-4393 Dated: January 6, 1993 HUBERT H. HUMPHREY III Attorney General State of Minnesota ~~ k/U JENNIFER K PARK Special Assistant Attorney General Atty. Reg. No. 17757X 520 Lafayette Road, Suite 200 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 (612) 297-4393 ATTORNEYS FOR DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PARK:A14 -2- " STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES In the Matter of the Application of City of Andover to Place Fill in Dehn's Pond (2-610W) to Construct Eldorado Street N.W., Anoka County NOTICE OF APpEARANCE OAH Docket No. 2-2000-7247-2 TO: Bruce D. Campbell, Acimini~trative Law Judge, 100 Washington Square, Suite 1700, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-2138 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned intends to appear at the hearing in the above matter to be held on February 9, 1993 at 10:00 a.m., in the Council Chambers at the City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in Andover, Minnesota. The hearing in the matter has been ordered by the Department of Natural Resources. The information required by Minn. Rules pt. 1400.5700 concerning the party filing this notice is as follows: Party's name: Party's current address: Party's telephone no.: Name of party's attorney or other representative: Address: TelephOne: Dated: ,1993 (Signature of Party or Attorney) r \' , I 1( 1- Office of ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF Ole \2 'C3 \-6-1 KENNETH G. WILKINSON MONTHLY 325 Jackson Street. Anoka, Minn :f;5&C-;:-,-fj-E-.OI 612-421-4760 FaJ: 612-422-11J -- " ! CITY OF ANDOVER 'DE C 3 0 1992 /: CONTRACT PRODUCTIVITY REPOR CITY OF ANOO;~ - , 1992 MONTH: November This report reflects the productivity of the Andover contract cars, 3125, 3135, 3145 and 3155. It does not include activity by Sheriff I s Department cars wi thin the city during non-contract hours, nor, activity by other Sheriff's Department cars within the city during contract houra. Arrests: Traffic 29 DWI 1 2 Radio Calls 508 Complaints 352 Medicals 19 P.I. Accidents 3 P.D. Accidents 30 Domestics 10 House Checks 73 Business Checks 370 Arrests: Felony G.M. 5 Misdemeanor 15 Arrests: Warrant 8 Papers Served: o ~ Warnings: 44 Aids: Public 46 Other Agencies 45 TOTAL MILES PATROLlED: 10,068 CAPTAIN LEN CHRIST ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT PATROL DIVISION -7- Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 MEMORANDUM TO: COPIES TO: FROM: DATE: Mavor and Citv Council Departments " David Almgren January 4, 1993 REFERENCE: nRrRMflRll 1 qq? MON'I'HT,V fI!TTr.nTNr. llRPOll'l' I hereby submit the following report of the Building Department for the Month of December 1992: BUILDING PERMITS 28 Residential (21 Sewer/7 Septic) 1 Addition 1 Garage 4 Chimney/Stove/Fireplace 1 Structural Change 4 Porches/Decks 39 PEIDIITS 39 Building Permits 44 Heating Permits 4 Heating Repair 21 Hook Up (sewer) 47 Plumbing Permits 354 Pumping Permits 9 Septic Permits 22 Water Meter Permits 28 Certificates of Occupancy 42 Contractor's License 26 License Verification Fee 9 Health Authority Form 21 Sewer Administration Fee 21 SAC Retainage Fee 2 Reinspection Fee TOTAL Building Department Income--December 1992 TOTAL Building Department Income--YTD 1992 TOTAL Valuation--December 1992 TOTAL Valuation--YTD 1992 Total Number of Houses YTD 1992 - 484 Total Number of Houses YTD 1991 269 APPROXIMATE VALUATION $ 2,718,000.00 8,064.00 7,680.00 5,700.00 200.00 14,500.00 $ 2,754,144.00 -FEES $ COLLECTED 18,412.70 1,435.00 145.20 525.00 4,655.00 885.00 315.00 1,100.00 112.00 1,050.00 130.00 45.00 315.00 147.00 60.00 $ 29,331.90 463,941.87 2,754,144.00 49,367,259.00 DA/jp !~ '\'\1 \~ \ ~. m Minnesota Department of Health 717 Delaware Street Southeast P.O. Box 9441 Minneapolis, MN 55440-9441 (612) 623-5000 Andover City Council c/o Ms. Vicki Volk, City Clerk Andover City Hall 1685 Crosstown Boulevard Northwest Andover, Minnesota 55304 Dear Council Members: JAN 6 1992 . ~ ~ ') Q; qJ"I rl Subject: Andover Public Works Department, Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota, PWSID 5020345 We are enclosing a copy of the report of our district office covering an investigation of your noncommunity water supply. The chemical results do not exceed the maximum contaminant levels established under the Safe Drinking Water Act. This report should be placed in your records and a copy maintained on or near the water supply premises and available for public inspection for not less than ten years. If you have any questions concerning the information contained in this report, please contact Carol Kephart, Public Health Sanitarian, at 612/627-5175. Sincerely, Sj+ ~ ~JS Douglas J. Mandy, P.E., Supervisor Noncommunity Water Supply Program Section of Water Supply and Well Management DJM:CAK:sjw Enclosure cc: Marina McManus, Administrator Anoka County Community Health Services An Equal Opportunity Employer MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH '(.' REPORT ON INVESTIGATION OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY Name of Water Supply PWS 10 Number Andover Public Works Department 502034 P Street Telephone Numbers: 1785 Northwest Crosstown Boulevard 612/755-5100 City State Zip Code City: Andover MN 55304 Operator: 612/755-8118 County District Engineer: Anoka Metro Other: Water Superintendent Classification Plant Classification Owner Type ~..."nlr P"" 1 i,. Wnrk <; SlJopr; n . Municinal Other Operators Classification Plant Type Plumbing Permits and 0 0 P-Nontransient Inspections Required Yes No Date of Previous Survey Date of Survey 10/18/90 10/12/92 City Engineer Survey Cycle: 36 months SERVICE AREA CHARACTERISTICS: o Municipal o School or College o Recreation Area o Mobile Home Park o Hotel/Motel o campground o Company Town o Resort o Housing Development o Institution o Restaurant ~Other Publ ic Works Population Served ,~~ Service Connections Storage Capacity: E-~ontransie~t = 1 (List Separately) ,,,n; ." - Design Capacity (gal/day) Average Daily Production (gal/day) 200 gallon pressure tank Emergency Capacity (gal/day) Highest Daily Production (gal/day) Total: 200 gallons TREATMENT WELL DATA c C ~ C "0 e .c " C .S! o c 0 .S! c .2! " .c C. "0 .~ C :; Uo "0 .g E a. c .c 0; C " 0 .S! .S! c c"';; C>. 0 .~ ~ .. " " a. c: > ;:: 0. U c: 0 " > u C .. .S! 0" .!? c .. i5 c -' " 0')'';; -' 0 ~ " .c " .S! :; " 'iii.~ C c<l 0 :S! c '" c C ~.~ E "0 u 2! C ~ .~ ~ 0:-= E :; ~ '" " .~ ;:: 0. '" ~ ~ ~ c .~ :; ... .. "0 ~.c E .c '" " 0; -..~ '" E > ~ " 0 o~ "0 ~ -'! " .;;; .. t; " " 0 '" " Source Name 0 i5 " 0 .. ;: u; c II) <( <( U II) U. UII) II) <( u. >- U U II) ;: al u. Q. 1979 6" lle 204 rt. 16 SUB Wpl1 #1 G P Tc awrence Remarks: Hail ing Address: Andover City Council Surveyed by: Carol A. Kephart c/o Ms. Vi cki Vol k, City Clerk Andover City Hall Approved by: !6~5 Cros~town ~2ule~~~g.Northwest H E-VUll4~'U~ , v Andover Public Works Department PWSID 5020345 October 12, 1992 Recommendations: 1. No water supply well, plumbing system, or on-site sewage treatment system serving the public shall be constructed, altered or extended until complete plans and specifications have been submitted to this department for review and approval in accordance with Minnesota Rules, p. 4720.0010. No work shall take place except in accordance with the approved plans. 2. The operator should keep the following records: a. Bacteriological test results as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act. b. Maintenance and repair. Comments: 1. Enclosed please find a copy of the most recent maximum contaminant levels established under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Ccutd~ Carol A. Kephart Public Health Sanitarian Section of Water Supply and Well Management Andover Public Works Department, Kitchen Bath Tap, PWSID 5020345, Date Sampled: 10/12/92 .' MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHEMICAL LABORATORY , REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS FINAL REPORT - CLIENT COPY PROGRAM NAME: NON-COMMUNITY - NON-TRANSIENT ANALYSIS/COMMENTS -------------------------------------------- UNIT: BACTICHEM 69 Nitrite + Nitrate Nitrogen 327 PA TOTAL COLIFORM-DW (COLILERT) Absent PROGRAM: SAMPLE: PAGE: DATE RECEIVED: DATE GENERATED: DATE REPORTED: RESULT HW 9222915 1 10/12/92 10/23/92 ----------------------- 0.02 A mg/L /100 ml - ,....._--.___..."._.."'._.. .,....~._. ,._. __....~_~,._......-..._,_~.~..~_"_' -c' .__'"'_,.,~_~...,.__.,..........--.. ,.... _.._,_ "'.,,'____or-__ Andover Public Works Department. Kitchen Bath Tap. PWSID 502034~ Date Sampled: 10/12/92 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHEMICAL LABORATORY ," REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS FINAL REPORT - CLIENT COpy PROGRAM NAME: NON-COMMUNITY - NON-TRANSIENT ANALYSIS/COMMENTS -------------------------------------------- UNIT: BACTICHEM 29 Total Fluoride -------------------------------------------- UNIT: METALS 110 Arsenic H20. Tot, SDWA 645 Sodium, SDWA, Total PROGRAM: SAMPLE: PAGE: DATE RECEIVED: DATE GENERATED: DATE REPORTED: RESULT HW 9222919 1 10/12/92 10/23/92 ----------------------- o. 15 ----------------------- mg/L .c 5.0 3. 7 ug/L ug/L ___w_..____.._.._...... __""__'._ _. __.._..__.._____.... __.'.____n...______._.~._____._._.__._. -- .-'---'---'- ~ ... ~ndover pUblic Works Department, Kitchen Bath Tap, PWSID 5020345, Date Sampled: - . . 502.4 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH - CHEMICAL LABORATORY . VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS (code 465) 10/12/92 1 -' SAMPLED: 10/12/92 LAB SAMPLE # : 9222917 i ~ ~ANALYZED: 10/16/92 , j REPORTED: 10/19/92 FIELD BLANK # : NONE , ~ P REPORTING AMOUNT REPORTING AMOUNT j' : LIMIT FOUND LIMIT FOUND " COMPOUND (UG/L) (UG/L) COMPOUND (UG/L) (UG/L) ~~T===================================================ca=======a==a======== oibhlorodifluoromethane< 1.0 I 1122-Tetrachloroethane< 0.2 Ch~oromethane < 2.0 I 123-Trichloropropane < 0.5 Vinyl Chloride < 1.0 I Bromobenzene < 0.2 Bromomethane < 2.0 12-Chlorotoluene < 0.5 Chloroethane < 1.0 14-Chlorotoluene < 0.5 Dichlorofluoromethane < 1.0 Il,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.2 Trichlorofluoromethane < 2.0 11,4-Dichlorobenzene < 0.2 Ttichloro- 11,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.2 trifluoroethane < 0.2 11,2-Dibromo- 1,1-Dichloroethene < 0.5 I 3-Chloropropane A~lyl Chloride < 0.5 124-Trichlorobenzene M~thylene Chloride < 0.5 Hexachlorobutadiene t-1,2-Dichloroethene < 0.1 l23-Trichlorobenzene l,l-Dichloroethane < 0.2 Ethyl Ether 2,2-dichloropropane < 0.5 Acetone c~1,2 Dichloroethene < 0.2 Methyl tertiary- Ch~oroform < 0.1 Butyl Ether Br6mochloromethane < 0.5 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 1,1,1-Trichloroethane < 0.2 Tetrahydrofuran l~l-Dichloropropene < 0.2 Benzene C?rbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 Methyl Isobutyl 1~2-Dichloroethane < 0.2 Toluene T~~chloroethene < 0.1 Ethyl Benzene t~g-Dichloropropane < 0.2 m+p-Xylene BG9modichloromethane < 0.2 o-Xylene D;bromomethane < 1.0 Styrene c,1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.2 Isopropyl Benzene t~1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.2 n-Propyl Benzene 1,1,2-Trichloroethane < 0.2 135-Trimethylbenzene 1,3-Dichloropropane < 0.2 tert-Butyl Benzene Tetrachloroethene < 0.2 124-Trimethylbenzene Chlorodibromomethane < 0.5 sec-Butylbenzene . 1,2-Dibromoethane < 1.0 p-Isopropyltoluene Chlorobenzene < 0.2 n-Butylbenzene 1~12-Tetrachloroethane < 0.2 Naphthalene Bromoform - < 1.0 < < < < Ketone< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < COMMENTS: ., f i I \; t ~egend: .i < t,i'2.; PP = t. ..., I, ,. I': less than peak present < < < < < < 2.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.0 20 2.0 10 10 0.2 5.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 . r-:- \::>\ .;,-;'....:: ' ~:- }..;. ..... ,.c-""-,.",,-,, ~"""~,-",""",,,:~-_..~.,.,. ---..'--', ~ . . , Compiled June 1991 Updated December 1991 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DRINKING WATER STANDARDS PRIMARY STANDARDS' , CHEMICAL INORGANICS CURRENT MCL 1 10 Ant i mony . . . . . . . . .. . Arsen i c. . . 50 119/1 Asbestos . . . . . . . . . Barium. . . . . . . . . 1000 119/1. Beryl ium. . . .. . . . . . - . . . Cadmium. ........ 10 119/1. Chromium. . . . . . . . . 50 119/1. Copper ~ . . . . . . . * 1000 119/1. Cyan i de . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . Fluoride , 4000 119/1,* 2000 119/1 Lead. . . . . . . .. 50 119/1. Mercury. . . . . . . . 2 119/1 Nickel . . . . . . . . Total Nitrate/Nitrite. Nitrate. 10000 119/1 Nitrite. .., . . Selenium . . 10 119/1. Silver. . n 50 119/1. Sulfate . . . .. .... ... Tha 11 ium. . . . . . . . . . - . . . .' NEW MCL / EFFECTIVE DATE 19 6 119/1 / September 1993 7 MFL2 / July 1992 2000 119/1 / January 1993 . . 4 119/1 / September 1993 . . 5 119/1 / July 1992 . . 100 119/1 I July 1992 .t 1300 119/1 / December 1992 . 200 119/1 / September 1993 .t 15 119/1 / December 1992 . 100 119/1 / September 1993 10000 119/1/ July 1992 .1000 119/1 / July 1992 50 119/1 / July 1992 * 100 I1g/ I / Ju ly 1992 500 mg/l / September 1993 . 2 119/1 / September 1993 1 MCL - Maximum Contaminant Level: Enforceable standard. 2 Million fibers per liter longer than 10 microns. . Secondary standard: Non-enforceable standard. , t Action level: Owner is not liable if action level is violated, however treatment can be enforced, (Primary standard) , Fluoride has a Primary and Secondary standard associated ,with it IX Silver is still a Primary Standard but is not monitored any more, and will become a secondary standard in July 1992. '. CHEMICAL CURRENT MCL NEW MCL / EFFECTIVE DATE ORGANICS Volatile Organic Chemicals 8 5 J.1g/l 5 J.1g/l 75 J.1g/l 5 J.1g/l 7 J.1g/l 21 Benzene. . . . . . . Carbon tetrachloride o-Dichlorobenzene. . para-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane . 1,1-Dichloroethylene . . cis-1,2 Dichloroethylene . trans-l,2 Dichloroethylene Dichloromethane . . 1,2-Dichloropropane. Ethylbenzene . . . . Monochlorobenzene. . Styrene. . . . . . . Tetrachloroethylene. Toluene. . . . . . . Trichloroethylene. . . 1,1,2-Trichloroethane. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Vinyl chloride Xy 1 enes . . . . . . . . Pesticides . 600 J.1g/l / July 1992 * Alachlor . . . . . Aldicarb . . . . . Alrlicarb sulfone. Aldicarb sulfoxide Atrazine . . . . . Carbofuran . . . . Chlordane (banned) Dalapon. . . . . . . . . . . Dibromochloropropane (DBCP). Dinoseb. . . . . Diquat . . . . . . 2,4-0. . . .. . . Endothall. . . . . Endrin (banned). . . . . Ethylene dibromide (EDB) Glyphosate . . . . Heptachlor (banned). . . . . Heptachlor epoxide (banned). Lindane (banned) . Methoxychlor . . . Oxamyl (Vydate). . Pentachlorophenol Picloram . . . . . Simazine . '. . . . Toxaphene (banned) . . . . 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) (banned) . . .70 J.1g/l / July 1992 * 100 J.1g/l ! July 1992 * . 5 J.1g/l / September 1993 * . 5 J.1g/l / July 1992 * ,700 J.1g/l / July 1992 * 100 J.1g/l / July 1992 * 100 J.1g/l / July 1992 * . 5 J.1g/l / July 1992 * 1000 J.1g/l / July 1992 * 5 J.1g/l / September 1993 * 9 J.1g/l / September 1993 * 10000 J.1g/l / July 1992 * 26 2 J.1g/l / July 1992 3 J.1g/l / January 1993 2 J.1g/l / January 1993 4 J.1g/l / January 1993 3 J.1g/l / July 1992 40 J.1g/l / July 1992 . 2 J.1g/l / July 1992 . 200 J.1g/l / September 1993 0.2 J.1g/l / July 1992 . 7 J.1g/l / September 1993 20 J.1g/l / September 1993 . 70 J.1g/l /July 1992 100 J.1g/l / September 1993 2.0 J.1g/l / September 1993 0.05 J.1g/l / July 1992 700 J.1g/l / September 1993 0.4 J.1g/l / July 1992 0.2 J.1g/l / July 1992 0.2 J.1g/l / July 1992 40 J.1g/l / July 1992 200 J.1g/l / September 1993 . 1 J.1g/l / January 1993 500 J.1g/l / September 1993 0.4 ~g/l / September 1993 . 3 J.1g/l / July 1992 50 J.1g/l / July 1992 .. .' . . 5 J.1g/l . 200 J.1g/l 2 J.1g/l 6 . ... 100 J.1g/l. . 0',2 J.1g/l. . 4 J.1g/l. 100 J.1g/l. . 5 J.1g/l. .10 J.1g/l. . These chemicals are currently monitored but compliance with the standards cannot be enforced until the effective date. I . .' Treatment Techniques Acrylamide . . . . . Epichlorohydrin. . . o NEW MCL / EFFECTIVE DATE 7 0.5 ~g/l I July i992 0.2 ~g/l I September 1993 400 ~g/l I September 1993 . 4 ~g/l I September 1993 . . 1 ~g/l I September 1993 . 50 ~g/l I September 1993 3*10~ ~g/l I September 1993 2 0.005% dosed at 1mg/l I July 1992 0.01% dosed at 20 mg/l I July 1992 Synthetic Organic Chemicals CURRENT MCL o CHEMICAL Polychlorinated biphenyls(PCB'S) (banned). Benzo(a)pyrene . . . . . . . . . Di-(ethylhexyl)adipate . . Di-(ethylhexyl)phthalate . . Hexachlorobenzene . . . . ------- Hex~chlorocyclopentadiene 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxin) Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM's) . . . . . . 1 100 ~g/l 1 DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS TURBIDITY Turbidity. . 1 NTUI as monthly average or,' , 5 NTU based on an average for 2 consecutive days. New turbidity I June 1993 treatment technique, Filtered,water turbidity must at no time exceed 5 NTU. 91 ~0.5 NTU' in 95% of monthly measurements ' ~1 NTU in 5% of monthly measurements. 92 ~1 NTU in 95% of monthly measurements. MICROBIOLOGICAL CONTAMINANTS 1 3 Total Coliform. Giardia lamblia. Presence ~ Minimum of 3 log removal (99.9%) ~ Minimum of 4 log removal (99.99%) I'June 1993 , I June 1993 Viruses. . . . RADIONUCLIDES 4 6 Radium-226 5 pCi combined with 20 pCi I January 1996 radium 228 Radium-228 5 pCi combined with 20 pCi I January 1996 radium 226 Radon-222. . . . . . . . . 300 pCi I January 1996 Uranium. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 pCi I January 1996 Adjusted gross alpha emitters. . 15 pCi body) Gross beta and photon emitters 4 mrem/year (any organ or whole 1 NTU. Nephelometric turbidity unit (unit of measurement for turbidity). ~1 Systems using conventional treatment or direct filtration. ~2 Systems using slow sand filtration or DE filtration. ' <I> The Surface Water Treatment Rule (SWTR) has J'Stablished performance standards that require the use of treatments techniquJ'S to achieve the dJ'Sired removal and/or inactivation of Giardia and viruses. I . SECONDARY STANDARDS 13 NEW SMCLl / EFFECTIVE DATE 15 50-200 ~g/l / July 1992 CHEMICAL CURRENT SMCL Aluminum Chloride Color. . Copper . . . Corros i v ity. Fluoride . . Foaming Agents Iron. . . Manganese. Odor. . pH . . . Silver. Sulphate TDS. . Zinc. . . 250000 ~g/l . . rs-tolor Units . 1000 ~g/l. non-corrosive 2000 ~g/l r (* 4000 ~g/l) . 500 ~g /l 300 ~g/l . . 50 ~g/l 3 threshold odor number . 6.5 - 8.5 . Xl 50 ~g/l. 250000 ~g/l 500000 ~g/l . 5000 ~g/l t 1300 ~g/l / December 1992 . . . . 100 ~g/l / July 1992 1 SMCL. Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level: Non-enCorceable standard.. . Fluoride has a PrimaI)' and SecondaI)' Standard, and an optimum level of 1500 Ilg/l. ~ Silver is still a PrimaI)' Standard but is not monitored any more. t Copper will have an Action level and be<:ome a Primary Standard in December 1992. ) . CHEMICAL INORGANICS UNREGULATED CONTAMINANTS EFFECTIVE MONITORING DATE RAL1 (u.a/l) Sodium. . . . . . . . . .ACTIVE ORGANICS Aldrin. . . . . . . . Bromobenzene. . . . . Bromodichloromethane. Bromoform . . Bromomethane. . . . . Butachlor . . . . . . Carbaryl. . . . . . . Chlorobenzene . . . . Chlorodibromomethane. Chloroethane. . Chloroform. . . Chloromethane. o-Chlorotoluene p-Chlorotoluene Dibromomethane. . m-Dichlorobenzene o-Dichlorobenzene Dichloromethane . . 1,I-Dichloroethane. cis-I,2-Dichloroethyle~e. trans-I,2-Dichloroethylene. 2,2-Dichloropropane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,3-Dichloropropane I,I-Dichloropropene 1,3-Dichloropropene . Dicamba . . . . . . Dieldrin. . . . . . 3-Hydroxycarbofuran Methomyl. . Metolachlor . . . . Metribuzin. . . . . Propachlor. . . . . 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane . 1,2,3-Trichloropropane. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene. .January 1993. .ACTIVE .ACTIVE. .ACTIVE. .ACTIVE. .January 1993 .January 1993. .ACTIVE. .ACTIVE. .ACTIVE .ACTIVE. .ACTIVE .ACTIVE .ACTIVE .ACTIVE .ACTIVE .ACTIVE * .ACTIVE, . . . . . . . . . . . . .50.0 .ACTIVE .ACTIVE * .ACTIVE * .ACTIVE .ACTIVE * .ACTIVE .ACTIVE .ACTIVE. .January 1993 .January 1993 .January 1993 .January 1993. .January 1993. .January 1993. .January 1993. .ACTIVE .ACTIVE .ACTIVE , . .ACTIVE, ... . . . . : . . . . . . 3.0 .ACTIVE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40.0 .ACTIVE * .0.02 . 3.0 .40.0 . . 0.1 700.0 100.0 .10.0 .60.0 5.0 . . . . . . . . . . . 2.0 200.0 100.0 200.0 .90.0 1 RAL. Recommended AlJowable Unlit: non-enforceable standards developed by the Minnesota .Department of Health primarily to provide an exposure guideline for private water supplies. . Regulation of these chemicals as primal)' drinking water standards will begin in July 1m. , Regulation of ,these chemicals as primal)' drinking water standards will begin in September 1993. m Minnesota Department of Health 717 Delaware Street Southeast P.O. Box 9441 Minneapolis, MN 55440-9441 (612) 623-5000 ~t- qJi3 I~J JAN 6 1992 Andover City Council c/o Ms. Vicki Volk, City Clerk Andover City Hall 1685 Northwest Crosstown Boulevard Andover, Minnesota 55304 Dear Council Members: Subject: Andover City Hall. Andover. Anoka County. Minnesota, PWSID 5020020 We are enclosing a copy of the report of our district office covering an investigation of your noncommunity water supply. The chemical results do not exceed the maximum contaminant levels established under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Although one volatile organic chemical was detected, the level found was well within health standards. This report should be placed in your records and a copy maintained on or near the water supply premises and available for public inspection for not less than ten years. If you have any questions concerning the information contained in this report, please contact Carol Kephart, Public Health Sanitarian, at 612/627-5175. Sincerely, O~'~y~p~r Noncommunity Water Supply Program Section of Water Supply and Well Management DJM:CAK:sjw Enclosure cc: Marina McManus, Administrator Anoka County Community Health Services Ron Swenson, Site Assessment Unit Minnesota Pollution Control Agency An Equal Opportunity Employer . MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REPORT ON INVESTIGATION OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY Name of Water Supply pws ID Number Andover City Hall 5020020 Street Telephone Numbers: 1685 Northwest Crosstown Boulevard 6l?/755-5100 CitY State' Zip Code CitY: fi 1? /7l;l;_A1 iR Andover MN 55304 Operator: County District Engineer: Anoka Metro Other: Water Superintendent Classification Plant Classification Owner Type Dave Almqren, Building Official Municipal Other Operators Classification Plant Type Plumbing Permits and 0 0 P-Nontransient Inspections Required Yes No Date of Previous Survey Oate of Survey - 09/25/89 10/12/92 City Engineer Survey Cycle: 36 months SERVICE AREA CHARACTERISTICS: o Municipal o School or College o Recreation Area o Mobile Home Park o Hotel/Motel o Campground o Company Town o Resort o Housing Development o Institution o Restaurant [Xl Other ri TV H'" 11 Population Served Service Connections Storage Capacity: E-Nontra~~!~~~ ~ t~~ 1 (List Separately) Design Capacity (gal/day) Average Daily Production (gal/day) Emergency CapacitY (gal/day I Highest Daily Production (gal/day) Total: 200 gallons TREATMENT WELL DATA c " C "0 .. .<: .. c .2 o c 0 .2 c ~ ;; .t:: ;, "0 .~ C :;; Uo "0 .2 E C. c ..<: ;; c .. 0 .2 .9 1:': '" 0 ;; ~ .. .. .. c. c > Co U ti c C c ;; 0 .. ~ > ii ;; .2 0" .S ." 0 0 ..J .. C)';:: ..J I- " " .2 " ._ N oll :2 .: "5 0:': c 0 '" ' c 0 Qi'E E "0 u 2! ~ ~ '" .S ~ ~ ~ E 0 :;; '" c " .!1 ;: Co :; '0; ~.c ~ c '; . " E '" ..<: '" ~..~ :;; '" 0 > " 0 "0 ~ '" "0 '" E ~ " ~ ~ ;; "'''0 :J Source Name 0 " o ~ c5 .. s: s: CD u.. en C en <{ <{ U en u.. Uen en I- <{ u.. >- U U en C1. I WE'll #1 G P 1973 4" 126 Rock 50 SUB . I Rema(ks: Mailing Address: Andcver City Council Carol A. Kephart Surveyed by: C/O Ms. Vicki Volk, City Clerk Andover City Hall - Approved by: 1685 Northwest Crosstown Boulevard ". .... . "".,nll H E-OOSll:2".o:r , , Andover City Hall PWSID 5020020 October 12, 1992 Recommendations: 1. No water supply well, plumbing system, or on-site sewage treatment system serving the public shall be constructed, altered or extended until complete plans and specifications have been submitted to this department for review and approval in accordance with Minnesota Rules, p. 4720.0010. No work shall take place except in accordance with the approved plans. 2. The operator should keep the following records: a. Bacteriological test results as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act. b. Maintenance.and repair. 3. A backflow preventer shall be installed on the waterline for the irrigation system. The type of device installed will be dependent on the highest outlet or sprinkler head elevation, location of zone valves, and the degree of hazard associated with the system, such as the injection of fertilizer and/or chemicals. (See attachment.) Comments: 1. Enclosed please find a copy of the most recent maximum contaminant levels established under the Safe Drinking Water Act. (}u;J ~ Carol A. Kephart Public Health Sanitarian Section of Water Supply and Well Management AridbverLltY--Hall; 'wOmen (~ ~ath i-ap; PWSI.r-5020oio::-'iiate"'sa~pl'ed~iO/i2;92 - 502.4 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH - CHEMICAL LABORATORY VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS (code 465) SAMPLED: ANALYZED: REPORTED: 10/12/92 10/16/92 10/19/92 . - . .'.- .---.------ 1 LAB SAMPLE #: 9222916 FIELD BLANK #: _ NONE COMPOUND REPORTING AMOUNT LIMIT FOUND (UG/L) (UG/L) COMPOUND REPORTING AMOUNT LIMIT FOUND (UG/L) (UG/L) =========================================================~==~~~_=ac=~====== Dichlorodifluoromethane< 1.0 Chloromethane < 2.0 vi~yl Chloride < 1.0 Bromomethane < 2.0 chioroethane < 1.0 Di~hlorofluoromethane < 1.0 Trichlorofluoromethane < 2.0 Trichloro- -- ~trifluoroethane < 0.2 1,1-Dichloroethene < 0.5 Allyl Chloride < 0.5 Methylene Chloride < 0.5 t-l,2-Dichloroethene < 0.1 1,1-Dichloroethane < 0.2 2,2-dichloropropane. < 0.5 c-1,2 Dichloroethene < 0.2 Chloroform < 0.1 Bromochloromethane < 0.5 1i1,1-Trichloroethane < 0.2 1,1-Dichloropropene < 0.2 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 1,2-oichloroethane < 0.2 Trichloroethene < 0.1 1,2-Dichloropropane < 0.2 Brmmodichloromethane < 0.2 Dibromomethane < 1.0 cT+,3-Dichloropropene < 0.2 t~t,3-Dichloropropene < 0.2 1~1,2-Trichloroethane < 0.2 1,3,-Dichloropropane < 0.2 Tetrachloroethene < 0.2 ChIorodibromomethane < 0.5 1,~-Dibromoethane < 1.0 Chlorobenzene < 0.2 1112-Tetrachloroethane < 0.2 Bromoform < 1.0 COMMENTS: Legend: < = less than PP = peak present r r j !~ .' .} ,- 1 l.. ~. ~, I ;., :a' li122-Tetrachloroethane< 1123-Trichloropropane < IBromobenzene < 12-Chlorotoluene < 14-Chlorotoluene < 11,3-Dichlorobenzene < 11,4-Dichlorobenzene < 11,2-Dichlorobenzene < 11,2-Dibromo- I 3-Chloropropane I 124-Trichlorobenzene IHexachlorobutadiene I 123-Trichlorobenzene IEthyl Ether IAcetone IMethyl tertiary- I Butyl Ether IMethyl Ethyl Ketone Tetrahydrofuran Benzene Methyl Isobutyl Toluene Ethyl Benzene m+p-Xylene o-xylene Styrene Isopropyl Benzene n-Propyl Benzene- 135-Trimethylbenzene tert-Butyl Benzene 124-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluene n-Butylbenzene Naphthalene < < < < Ketone< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.0 < < < < < < 2.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.0 20 2.0 10 10 0.2 5.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 /" '"';:>, \ Andover City Hall. Women's Bath Tap. PWSID 5020020. Date Sampled: 10/12/92 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHEMICAL LABORATORY PROGRAM: SAMPLE: PAGE: DATE RECEIVED: DATE GENERATED: " REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS FINAL REPORT - CLIENT COpy PROGRAM NAME: NON-COMMUNITY - NON-TRANSIENT DATE REPORTED: ANALYSIS/COMMENTS RESULT UNIT: BACTICHEM 29 Total Fluo~ide 0.12 UNIT: METALS 110 A~senic H20, Tot, SDWA 645 Sodium, SDWA, Total 5. 1 2. 1 HW 9222918 1 10/12/92 10/23/92 mg/L ug/L ug/L Andover City Hall. Women's Bath Tap. PWSID 5020020. Date Sampled: 10/12/92 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHEMICAL LABORATORY . REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS FINAL REPORT - CLIENT COPY PROGRAM NAME: NON-C0l1MUNITY - NOl\!-TRANSIENT ANALYSIS/COMMENTS lINIT: BACTICHEM 69 Nitrite + Nitrate Nitrogen 327 PA TOTAL COLIFORM-OW (CoLILERT) Absent PROGRAM: SAMPLE: PAGE: DATE RECEIVED: DATE GENERATED: DATE REPORTED: RESULT .:.: 0.01 A HW 9222914 1 10/12/92 10/23/92 mg/L /100 ml Compiled June 1991 Updated December 1991 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DRINKING WATER STANDARDS PRIMARY STANDARDS CHEMICAL INORGANICS CURRENT MCL 1 10 NEW MCL / EFFECTIVE DATE 19 6 ~g/l / September 1993 7 MFL2 / July 1992 2000 ~g/l / January 1993 . . 4 ~g/l / September 1993 . . 5 ~g/l / July 1992 . . 100 ~g/l / July 1992 .t 1300 ~g/l / December 1992 . 200 ~g/l / September 1993 .t 15 ~g/l / December 1992 . 100 ~g/l / September 1993 10000 ~g/l / July 1992 .1000 ~g/l / July 1992 50 ~g/l / July 1992 * 100 M/7 / Ju7y 1992 500 mg/l / September 1993 . 2 ~g/l / September 1993 Ant imony. . . . . . . . .. . Arsenic. . . 50 ~g/l Asbestos . . . . . . . . . Barium. . . . . . . . . 1000 ~g/l. Beryl ium. . . .. . . . . . - . . . Cadmium. . . . . . . . . . 10 ~g/l. Chromium. . . . . . . . . 50 ~g/l. Copper. . . . . . . . * 1000 ~g/l. Cyan i de . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . Fluoride , 4000 ~g/l,* 2000 ~g/l Lead. .. . . . . .. 50 ~g/l. Mercury. . . . . . ~ . 2 ~g/l Nickel . . . . . . . . . . Total Nitrate/Nitrite. Nitrate. 10000 ~g/l Nitrite. . . Selenium . . 10 ~g/l. Silver. . n 50 ~g/l. Sulfate. ........ ... Thallium. . . . . . . . . . - . . . 1 MCL - Maximum Contaminant Level: Enforceable standard. 2 Million fibers per liter longer than 10 microns. . Secondary standard: Non~nforceable standard. . t Action level: Owner is not liable if action level is violated, however treatment can be enforced, (Primary standard) , Fluoride has a Primary and Secondary standard associated with it tl Silver is still a Primary Standard but is not monitored any more, and will become a secondary standard in July 1992. CHEMICAL ORGANICS Volatile Organic Chemicals Benzene. . . . . . . Carbon tetrachloride o-Dich1orobenzene. . para-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dich1oroethane . 1,1-Dich1oroethy1ene . . cis-l,2 Dich1oroethy1ene . trans-1,2 Dich1oroethy1ene Dich1oromethane . . .' 1,2-Dich1oropropane. Ethy1benzene . . . . Monoch1orobenzene. . Styrene. . . . . . . Tetrachloroethylene. Toluene. . . . . . . Trichloroethylene. . . 1,1,2-Trich1oroethane. 1,1,1-Trich1oroethane. 1,2,4-Trich1orobenzene Vinyl chloride Xy1enes. . . . . . . . Pesticides Alach10r . . . . . A1dicarb . . . . . Aldicarb sulfone. Aldicarb sulfoxide Atrazine . . . . . Carbofuran . . . . Chlordane (banned) Oalapon. . . . . . . . . . . Dibromochloropropane (DBCP). Dinoseb. . . Diquat . . . . . . 2,4-0. . . .'. . . Endothal1. . . . . Endrin (banned). . . . . Ethylene dibromide (EDB) G1yphosate . . . . Heptachlor (banned). . . . . Heptachlor epoxide (banned). Lindane (banned) . Methoxychlor . . . Oxamyl (Vydate). . Pentachlorophenol Pic10ram . . . . . Simazine . '. .. . Toxaphene (banned) . . . . 2,4,5-TP (Si1vex) (banned) CURRENT MCL 8 5 119/1 5 119/1 75 119/1 5 119/1 7 119/1 .. . . 5 119/1 . 200 119/1 2 119/1 6 . .. . ... 100 119/1. . ... 0.,2119/1. NEW MCL / EFFECTIVE DATE 21 . . . . 600 119/1 / July 1992 * .70 119/1 / July 1992 * 100 119/1 / July 1992 * . 5 119/1 I September 1993 * . 5 119/1 / July 1992 * .700 119/1 / July 1992 * 100 119/1 / July 1992 * 100 119/1 / July 1992 * . 5 119/1 / July 1992 * 1000 119/1 / July 1992 * 5 119/1 / September 1993 * 9 119/1 / September 1993 * 10000 119/1 j July 1992 * 26 2 119/1 / July 1992 3 119/1 / January 1993 2 119/1 / January 1993 4 119/1 / January 1993 3 119/1 / July 1992 40 119/1 / July 1992 . 2 119/1 / July 1992 . 200 119/1 / September 1993 0.2 119/1 / July 1992 . 7 119/1 /September 1993 20 119/1 / September 1993 . 70 119/1 /July 1992 100 119/1 / September 1993 2.0 119/1 / September 1993 0.05 119/1 / July 1992 700 119/1 / September 1993 0.4 119/1 / July 1992 0.2 119/1 / July 1992 0.2 119/1 / July 1992 40 119/1 / July 1992 200 119/1 / September 1993 . 1 119/1 / January 1993 500 119/1 / September 1993 0.4 119/1 / September 1993 . 3 119/1 / July 1992 50 119/1 / July 1992 . 4 119/1. 100 119/1. . 5 119/1.. .10 119/1. . These chemicals are currently monitored but compliance with the standards cannot be enforced until the effective date. . CHEMICAL CURRENT MCL o Treatment Techniques Acrylamide . . . . . Epichlorohydrin. . . DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS o NEW MCL / EFFECTIVE DATE 7 0.5 ~g/l / July 1992 0.2 ~g/l / September 1993 400 ~g/l / September 1993 . 4 ~g/l / September 1993 . . 1 ~g/l / September 1993 . 50 ~g/l / September 1993 3*10~ ~g/l / September 1993 2 0.005% dosed at lmg/l / July 1992 0.01% dosed at 20 mg/l / July 1992 Synthetic Organic Chemicals Polychlorinated biphenyls(PCB's) (banned). Benzo(a)pyrene . . . . . . Di-(ethylhexyl)adipate . . Di-(ethylhexyl)phthalate . Hexachlorobenzene . . . . Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxin) .. Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM's) 1 100 ~g/l 1 TURBIDITY Turbidity. . 1 NTU1 as monthly average or,' '5 NTU based on an average for 2 consecutive days. New turbidity treatment technique / June 1993 " Filtered,water turbidity must at no time exceed 5 NTU. ~l ~0.5 NTU in 95% of monthly measurements , ~l NTU in 5% of monthly measurements. ~2 ~l NTU in 95% of monthly measurements. MICROBIOLOGICAL CONTAMINANTS 1 3 Total Coliform. Giardia lamblia. Presence ~ Minimum of 3 log / 'June 1993 removal (99.9%) ~ Minimum of 4 10) / June 1993 removal (99.99% 4 6 5 pCi combined with 20 pCi / January 1996 radium 228 5 pCi combined with 20 pCi / January 1996 radium 226 . . . . e. . . 300 pCi / January 1996 . . . . " . . . 30 pCi / January 1996 . 15 pCi body) 4 mrem/year (any organ or whole Viruses. . . . RADIONUCLIDES Radium-226 Radium-228 Radon-222. Uranium. . ... . . Adjusted gross alpha emitters. Gross beta and photon emitters 1 NTIJ - Nephelometric turbidity unil (unit of measurement for turbidity). U Systems using conventional treatment or direct filtration. ~2 Systems using slow sand filtration or DE filtration. ' <l> The Surface Waler Trealment Rule (SWIR) has established perfonnance standards that require the use of treatments techniques 10 achieve the desired removal and/or inactivation of Giardia and viruses. SECONDARY STANDARDS CHEMICAL CURRENT SMCL 13 NEW SMCLI I EFFECTIVE DATE 15 50-200 ~g/l / July 1992 Aluminum Chloride Co lor. . Copper . . Corrosivity. Fluoride. . . Foaming Agents Iron. . . Manganese. Odor . pH . . . Silver. Sulphate TDS. Zinc. . . 250000 ~g/l . . 15 Color Units . 1000 ~g/l. non-corrosive 2000 ~g/l, (* 4000 ~g/l) 500 ~g/l 300 ~gl1 . . 50 ~g 11 3 threshold odor number . 6.5 - 8.5 . J:l 50 ~g/l. 250000 ~g/l 500000 ~g/l . 5000 ~g/l t 1300 ~g/l / December 1992 . . . . 100 ~g/l / July 1992 1 SMCL. Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level: Non-enforceable standard. . Fluoride has a Primary and Secondary Standard, and an optimum level of 1500 IJ-g/I. XI Silver is still a Primary Standard but is not monitored any more. t Copper will have an Action level and become a Primary Standard in December 1992. CHEMICAL INORGANICS UNREGULATED CONTAMINANTS EFFECTIVE MONITORING DATE RAL 1 (110/1) Sodium. . . . .ACTIVE ORGANICS Aldrin. . . . . . . . Bromobenzene. . . . . Bromodichloromethane. Bromoform . . Bromomethane. Butachlor . . . . . . Carbaryl. . . . . . . Chlorobenzene . . . . Chlorodibromomethane. Chloroethane. . Chloroform. . . Chloromethane , o-Chlorotoluene p-Chlorotoluene Dibromomethane. . m-Dichlorobenzene o-Dichlorobenzene Dic~loromethane . . 1,1-Dichloroethane. cis-l,2-Dichloroethyle~e. . trans-l,2-Dichloroethylene. 2,2-Dichloropropane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,3-Dichloropropane . l,l-Dichloropropene 1,3-Dichloropropene Dicamba . . . . . . Dieldrin. . . . . . 3-Hydroxycarbofuran Methomyl. . . . . . Metolachlor . . . . Metribuzin. . . . . Propachlor. . . . . 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane . 1,2,3-Trichloropropane. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene. . . .January 1993. .ACTIVE .ACTIVE. .ACTIVE. . ACTIVE. .January 1993 .January 1993. .ACTIVE. . ACTIVE. .ACTIVE .ACTIVE. .ACTIVE .ACTIVE .ACTIVE .ACTIVE .ACTIVE .ACTIVE * .ACTIVE, .... . . . . . . . . .50.0 .ACTIVE .ACTIVE * .ACTIVE * .ACTIVE .ACTIVE * .ACTIVE .ACTIVE . ACTIVE. .January 1993 .January 1993 .January 1993 .January 1993. .January 1993. .January 1993. .January 1993. .ACTIVE .ACTIVE .ACTIVE , .ACTIVE, ... . . . . ~ . . . . . . 3.0 .ACTIVE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40.0 .ACTIVE * .0.02 . 3.0 .40.0 . 0.1 700.0 100.0 .10.0 .60.0 5.0 . . . . . . . . . . . 2.0 200.0 100.0 200.0 .90.0 1 RAL - Recommended Allowable Limit : non-enforceable standards developed by the Minnesota Department of Health primarily to provide an exposure guideline for private water supplies. . Regulation of these chemicals as primary drinking water standards will begin in July 1992 , Regulation of .these chemicals as primary drinking water standards will begin in September 1993. tj7l5.2110 Reduced Pres sure Zone [3ackflow Preventer Reduced Pressure Zone Backflow Pre venter I _t_ i i ~,\t/ ..~u...cJ'-9:{:L~~~'. ,.' .,' :Y ..\./ / 'II .'" -If-~\::~V ~~~!l~ . ( A Reduced Pressure Zone Type Backflow Preventer must be installed on lawn sprinkler systems when any sprinkler outlet is higher than the backflow preventer. (Maybe subject to constant static pressure, back pressure, and back syphonage.) \. 61-A 4715.2l5e ., Vacuum Breakers Atmos pheric Type - Control Valve Manual or Automatic ( ~/ \!Y v\ .,.,...( _ w "'.....-. . . . . '. . . . -. ~ . : Atmospheric vacuum breaker on lawn sprinkler system must be installed at least 12 inches above highest sprinkler outlet and on the non-pressure side of the last control valve. \ \ 60 4715.2150 Vacuum Breakers Pressure Type ~ Pressure Type i Vacuum Breaket \ I NT t><l --- --r 12" M~'1/ \.~~ \ / I ," ~~/ ~ ~~ ~~"_.,..,. \ Control Valves Pressure type vacuum breaker on lawn sprinkler system must be installed at least 12 inches above highest sprinkler outlet and may be subject to constant static pressure. ) ~. \ . ;0 (-", ;f/1/5 LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION ANDOVER - ANOKA - COON RAPIDS - RAMSEY 2015 1ST AVE., ANOKA MN 55303 RECEIVED JAN 7 1993 CITY OF ANDOVER MEETING NOTICE Thursday, January 21, 1993 - 8:30 a.m. - Committee Room, Anoka City Hall AGENDA A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Minutes of Previous Meetings D. Treasurer's Report 1. Discussion of LRRWMO Budget E. Payment of Bills F. Report of Officers 1. On-site Project Inspection Form - Jankowski 2. Report on Replacement Agreement for Sunny Ponds Jankowski G. Consideration of Communications 1. Assessment of Groundwater Questionnaire for Anoka County Protection Needs H. Pending Projects/Permit Reviews 1. Permit Application Evaluations - All Members 2. Additional Riverdale Development - Ottensman 3. Mitigation of Ramsey Meadows Phase II Plans Jankowski 4. Mineral Pond Sixth Addition - Schultz I. Old l. 2. Business Water Quality Records/Maintenance - Anoka Co. SWCD Refund for Seechi Schrantz Jankowski Disk Readings- J. New Business 1. Review Proposals for Engineering/Legal Consulting Services K. Adjournment ATTENDANCE: WMO Members REMINDER: THE BILL REVIEW COMMITTEE WILL MEET PRIOR TO THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION DECEMBER 17, 1992 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Jim Schrantz called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. in the Committee Room of Anoka City Hall. ROLL CALL Members present were Jim Schrantz, Steve Jankowski, and Anoka Alternate Ray Schultz. Bill Ottensman and John Weaver were absent. Also present was Deputy Treasurer Jim Knutson. PAYMENT OF BILLS Knutson presented the bills for payment consideration: A $175.00 bill from Barr Engineering, invoice #15102-390, dated November 25, 1992, for professional services during the period October 4 through October 31, 1992. He also discussed the LRRWMO partial payment withheld, during the November 19, 1992, regular LRRWMO meeting, from the August 30 through October 3, 1992, Barr Engineering bill for engineering work done on the Mineral Pond Sixth Addition project. Knutson reported discussing this with Skallman by telephone and recommended the board authorize payment of this $56.00 expenditure. Knutson also presented a bill payable to the Minnesota Book Store, Department of Administration, in the amount of $31.20 for advertising for consulting services in the State Reqister. Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Schultz, to AUTHOR- IZE PAYMENT OF THE BILLS PRESENTED: BARR ENGINEERING FOR $175.00 AND MINNESOTA BOOK STORE IN THE AMOUNT OF $31.20, AS WELL AS THE $56.00 TO BARR ENGINEERING FOR PAYMENT OF ENGINEERING WORK DONE ON THE MINERAL POND SIXTH ADDITION PROJECT, AS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED AT THE NOVEMBER MEETING. 3 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES Schrantz noted in the November 19, 1992, meeting minutes where a question had been raised about whether or not the fiscal year 1993-94 final cost assessments were based on total valuation of each member city without deducting tax increment financing. Knutson indicated he contacted Anoka County officials about this matter and confirmed that the LRRWMO Meeting Minutes December 17, 1992 Page 2 figures provided the LRRWMO from the county were the gross value including tax increment financing. Schrantz also noted on page minutes where the Engineering and Anoka were to respond requested SWLRB Model Survey. neither city has yet completed four of the November meeting staffs of the Cities of Andover to the Metropolitan Council It was noted that apparently the survey. Schrantz further queried whether Jankowski has developed an on-site inspection form, as discussed on page five of the November meeting minutes, to be utilized for uniform project inspections throughout the LRRWMO area. Jankowski indicated said form was not yet prepared. However, he would make one available for LRRWMO consideration at the January 1993 regular meeting. Motion was made by APPROVE THE NOVEMBER PRINTED. Jankowski, 19,1992, seconded by Schrantz, to REGULAR MEETING MINUTES AS 2 ayes - 0 nayes - 1 present (Schultz). Motion carried. TREASURER'S REPORT October and November Financial Reports Knutson presented the Treasurer's Report for the periods ending October 31, 1992, and November 30, 1992, showing respective account balances of: checking account, $10.00 and $10.00; interest bearing savings account, $6,459.16 less the permit account balance of $1,423.00 for an,available interest bearing saving account balance in October of $5,036.16 and in November an interest bearing savings account balance of $5,983.25 less the permit account balance of $1,610.00 for an available November interest bearing savings account balance of $4,373.25; and certificate of deposit balances of $10,000.00 and $10,000.00; for current total balances ending October 31, 1992, and November 30, 1992, of $16,469.16 and $15,993.25, respectively. Knutson stated all budget line items look to be in good shape; we will be carrying over a good balance to next year. Jankowski noted that Ramsey's assessments were increased approximately $3,000-$4,000. Knutson confirmed that is because last year's insurance premium costs were taken out of reserves. It had been the board's decision to increase the budget to cover future insurance premium costs plus the normal increase in expenditures during the year. '.-:!.-. LRRWMO Meeting Minutes December 17, 1992 Page 3 The board members and Knutson reviewed the Summary of Permit Fee Applications spread sheet provided for the period ending December 17, 1992. He explained that the balances shown at the bottom indicate the project expenditures exceeding the $500 permit fee submitted which have been charged to the respective cities. Knutson also noted that some of these projects are closed out and recommended the appropriate LRRWMO member from those respective cities confirm the projects' completion status and submit written confirmation thereof to the LRRWMO board, recommending that the remaining permit fee balances be refunded to the appropriate applicant. Schrantz concurred it is the responsibility of each city to notify this board when these projects are closed. He directed that the board evaluate these permit applications at the January 1993 meeting to determine which fund balances may be returned to the applicants. Knutson acknowledged that just this week he received the Mineral Pond Sixth Addition permit application. Motion was made by Schultz, seconded by Jankowski, to ACCEPT THE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTHS OF OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER 1992 AS PRESENTED. 3 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. Jankowski requested an explanation of the budget line items in order that he might pass on the information to his Ramsey Budget Committee. The budget was discussed. Both Schrantz and Schultz indicating that, as with most budgets, the amounts indicated are just estimates; the budget is intended to be flexible. Schrantz stated the LRRWMO budget is minimal as it is. We must ensure we do not go in the hole. Schultz indicated he is comfortable with the existing approved budget. Jankowski stated his only concern was in not carrying over a large surplus balance to the following year. He suggested perhaps using the year-end surplus balance to pay bills. Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded for discussion by Schrantz, that BEFORE WE SEND OUT THE REQUEST FOR SECOND PAYMENT MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR 1993 WE REVIEW THE YEAR-END BALANCE FROM 1992 AND CONSIDER WHETHER WE WANT TO APPLY THE SURPLUS TO REDUCE THE SECOND HALF 1993 MEMBERSHIP DUES. Knutson reminded the board of each year. Also, if 1994, each city would have cities have already levied an audit is done in the LRRWMO lowered to reduce the levy. for the 1993 budget. April or May the budget in However, the LRRWMO Meeting Minutes December 17, 1992 Page 4 In defense of his motion, Jankowski stated he is not suggest- ing the board change its 1993 budget. Just that before we send out the second half bills that we take a look at the budget. Jankowski concurred he felt the LRRWMO is operating under a conservative budget. Schrantz agreed the board could take a look at it in August and see if we want to use the surplus in 1994. Schultz cautioned that this board should also keep a surplus to cover unknown contingencies. Knutson concurred there may be state mandates coming about which we are unaware. Schultz indicated he was not comfortable voting in favor of this motion without a recommendation from the Deputy Treasurer on what kind of budgetary surplus this organization should carry. . Schrantz stated he would be willing to review the budget balances in August. VOTE: 3 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. The Administrative Secretary informed the board she will be receiving a 2.5 per cent wage increase from the City of Anoka effective January 1, 1993. Since this board has historically approved her salary concurrent with that paid her by the City of Anoka, she requested the board's consideration of the upcoming wage increase for LRRWMO-related activities. Motion was made by Schrantz, and unanimously seconded, to APPROVE A 2.5 PER CENT WAGE INCREASE FOR MAVA MIKKONEN EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1993. 3 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. Consideration of Fidelity Bond Insurance Knutson referred to a November 16, 1992, letter from Conway Olson, Vice-President, T. C. Field & Company, reminding the board that it presently carries no fidelity bond insurance coverage. Knutson indicated that what is at risk is the cash available. There is a minimum cost for this insurance. However, Knutson also reminded the board that checks drawn on the LRRWMO account(s) must have more than one signature. In addition, he is bonded through the City of Anoka. Motion was made by Jankowski, seconded by Schultz, to NOT PURCHASE FIDELITY BOND INSURANCE COVERAGE. 3 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. LRRWMO Meeting Minutes December 17, 1992 Page 5 Knutson queried who is responsible for putting together the wetland regulations annual report and the audit report. Schrantz indicated the board should ask its attorney to attend a few meetings to tell us where we are and what we should be doing. Knutson added that an annual activity report should also be done. No formal action taken. REPORT OF OFFICERS Consideration of Joininq the Watershed Association Schrantz reported he attended the November 24, 1992, meeting hosted by the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources, which solicited the input and interest of WMO members and metropolitan Watershed Districts in the formation of a Metropolitan Association of Watershed Management Organizations. He reported that unfortunately approximately 60 per cent of those present did not seem to care; therefore, no vote was taken. Schrantz reported he recommended at the meeting that we join the Watershed District organization because it is already formed. However, nothing was settled. Schrantz requested the LRRWMO's consideration of joining the Watershed District organization ourselves. Jankowski stated that joining an organization comprised of people doing the same function we are would be valuable. However, he queried which group the LRRWMO should join. Schrantz's response was he did not think the WMOs will form an organization. They did not want to do anything. Jankowski stated in that case the LRRWMO should join the organization who has it together. Schultz indicated he had no problem with that. However, he queried whether or not there were dues expected in order to join. What if the member cities can not pay? Schrantz responded that either the current WMO works, under a Joint Powers Agreement, or the county will take over and form a watershed. In any event, Schrantz stated he must complete a questionnaire he had responding to this WMO's position on the issue. Upon discussion of the questionnaire, the board concurred the LRRWMO will join the watershed districts. Schrantz indicated he would fill out the questionnaire in accordance with the discussion during this meeting. Other Jankowski reported having contact with Cathy Brehm, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, who has indicated we are in non-compliance with the Ramsey Gordon Oftedahl. LRRWMO Meeting Minutes December 17, 1992 Page 6 matter. follow-up reminded restore a Ms. Brehm has requested letter to Mr. Oftedahl. the board that the LRRWMO wetland. that As an order Jankowski send a update, Jankowski this developer to Jankowski also reported Ms. incident whereby there was reportedly requested that violation also and that we Brehm has indicated there is an a wetland filled in Andover. She Jankowski inform the board of that would be hearing from her. Schrantz stated Andover will be looking at Rosella Sonsteby's situation again also. CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNICATIONS Local Water Manaqement Rules Jankowski reported attending a Metropolitan.Council meeting on December 15, 1992, which had many City Engineers in attendance. He stated he did not know how much discretion we have in complying with the Local Water Management Rules. Schrantz stated they have already been approved. Jankowski indicated we have to adopt an ordinance making use of the best management practices as contained in the manual developed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (PCA). This manual is available for $25.00; however, there may be an opportunity to obtain copies of the manual free of charge through the municipalities. Schrantz stated that information is already part of our plan. It had been the board's decision to use the Water Management Plans of the Minnesota PCA and the Board of Water and Soil Resources in our plan. Schultz stated he did not necessarily agree with the stan- dards set out by those agencies in that they may impose too much of a burden on the communities. In addition, he felt it was wrong to insert something in the Water Management Plan which will not be implemented. Schrantz directed that this issue be carried over to the January 1993 regular meeting agenda. Wetland Conservation Act Rules It was noted that the meeting at the State Building to discuss the Wetland Conservation Act Rules was scheduled for this evening at 8:00 a.m. Unfortunately, no one was able to attend. Schrantz noted this board has five days in which to respond to those rules after said meeting. ~ LRRWMO Meeting Minutes December 17, 1992 Page 7 A December 15, 1992, memorandum from Coon Rapids Planner Kevin Ringwald stating that city's position on the proposed wetland rules was discussed. Schultz stated that, according to this memorandum, the budget impact to implement these rules will be $20,000 per Local Governmental Unit. Jankowski suggested this board write a letter expressing the same concerns as that of the City of Coon Rapids. The board concurred. The Administrative Secretary was directed to compile a letter to Allen Klein, Office of Administrative Hearings, over the Chairman's signature, immediately following this meeting. Wetland Conservation Act Public Hearinqs The board discussed the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources scheduled Wetland Conservation Act public hearings, indicating they would see if anyone could attend. Other A December 8, 1992, letter to Chairman Schrantz, from Robert M. Hutchison, Director of Environmental Services, Anoka County Human Services Division, was reviewed. Said letter requested the board's assistance in the county's completion of an assessment of groundwater protection needs for the Anoka County Board of Commissioners by completing an attached questionnaire. The board agreed to place this matter on the January 1993 regular meeting agenda for further consideration. PENDING PROJECTS/PERMIT REVIEWS Ramsey Meadows Update Jankowski reported been completed. presented. the Ramsey Meadows restoration project has A brief summary of project details was Additional Riverdale Development It was noted that Ottensman was not present to discuss this issue. Schultz indicated no permit application has been submitted. This agenda item will be carried over to the January meeting. z o E= <c N - ~~ ClZ o::~ O~ E-oen z~ ~...... ~~ ~<c ClE-o <cen zO <cU ~Cl o::~ ~E-o E-o<c <Co:: ~~ o::e... ~O >0:: -~ O::o:l :2~ ~:2 0:: ~ ~ o -l o "5 "::::lM 00\ ~ , U~ en o::l ... I:: OM SO\ >.' <a.... e...N '<t" 0\ 0\ .... ... eo I:: I:: 0 '''::; * ~ e ~ ~ o '" '" 0..0'" OU<c .... M >< 0:: <c ;:J z <c ..., , M C\ C\ .... I::~ .90 ,E~ U ::l ~ I-::ao <c>lr) .... >< 0:: <c ::> 0:: o:l ~ ~ * I::~ .9 '" ... I:: 5 .9 co 0- >:2 ... I:: I;) I;) l- I;) e... '" I;) I- <a U o <a 1-0 <c'<t" I- o .0 S >. I;) _ :20 ... I:: o U I- <:) e... o::llr)",," M N N NNM lr) lr) M \O",,"o::l N"N"M" o::l lr) """ MN N NNM lr)lr)M \O",,"o::l N"N"M" \OO\o::l r---""",,,," "';'''';'...0 00\0 MO\\O lr)" -.:i r---" lr)lr)N .... 0\ .... .C'i ...0 N NN",," .... """ \0 oq"""oc N"';N N",,"M C'!~\O lr)Mr--: lr) \Q \Q N",,"M o::l\QO\ "<1;"""<'1 lr)N...... M ...... lr) O\NN .... ...... \0 M...... """ I- <:) > o '0 o ::l :::l > "0 c:J ~ ~ <:) ... '" ~ o ..<:: ... eo I:: 'r:;; ::l CIl U ~ <:) ..<:: a "::::l I:: <a '" I- . <:) c:J o..~ .2 ~ c:J c:J > '- <:) > "0 c:J ... I- <a I- .::~ eo I:: I:: e 's '"5 ::l u '" '- ~c. "::::le.. I:: <a '" I:: " '" ~ >. "'.0 8 ~ eo'" I:: 0 ._ u ... eo E! I:: 0'- o..ti o u <:) .5 > eo "= c CIl c:J '::"0 .~ = .5 ~ .5eh e;:~ '" u CIl ~ I- ... '" I- U ~ >..:= o >. o <a . N e.. ey:;" '" ...... ... ~C5 c u o I- "0 U ~ .5 '" ,.... t:O..::: ... <:) ..:.: I- '" :2 "::::l <:) ... e;: s - on ~ * * * on - on <:) o ~ U ... ... = c:J U .... >. I- =.0 U <:) e..Su <:) <:) :5'i >'0' "::::l 8 I- =c..e.. '" S..<:: c "- ~ c ~ 11.) 0":: 0 """ .... ti .q ::l <:)_ ...... .... ;> 0 = I- <:) i:e...s c:J e.. U ::: 0 ti .9 e:J e.. (;j ti S;; '2 "0 ~ '" <a ::: /:.0- _ I- ::l "::::l 0 S u <:) I- ~..<::2 ..c=~ e ;:j ~ on E c:: I;) '" ~ .;:; '" l:: <a <:) c.:::"O~ ~ 5 ~ eo - ~ = 0 0 '_ .0 I- ~ <:) <a ......<:: c "::::l .... <a c:J c: eo c -.5 .9 - :t:l E ~ ;::] -'0>' e..I;).o e...... '" ~ ~.~ ....Q1:: e;: 0 ",.?;>e.. ... 0 '" = l- e ::l c.. uJ:eo ~ a .S co.;: r::: u ~ I- 0 - I;) = c...o u "::::lE.o = <:) U u E .: .~ -fi ... CIl E: <:) .; '0 = CIl E e -g ~ u '" ES fo .~ 0'0 ... I- '0 <a <:) 0 eot:O a'O - I;) u..<:: U ~ ..0,= '" ~ .... <:) I- ::l '" <a <:) ~ >. ... ::l 0.. <:) Cl C o '" .... ::l ~ E ;.:; N" C\ , C\ "0 I;) l- e;: e.. c:J l- e... Lower Rum River Water Management Organization Treasurer's 1993 Budget Report February 1, 1993 Paid Year This To 1993 Report Date Budget Balance Engineering: DNR Permit Review $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Administration 800.00 800.00 Commission Meetings 1,500.00 1,500.00 Surveys & Studies 1,000.00 1,000.00 Management Plan 1,000.00 1,000.00 Miscellaneous 1,000.00 1,000.00 Reimburseable Expenses 0.00 0.00 LRR WMO Permit Review 0.00 0.00 Enginerring Total 0.00 0.00 6,300.00 6,300.00 Miscellaneous: Legal 3,800.00 3,800.00 Audit 500.00 500.00 Professional Services 2,000.00 2,000.00 Postage, Copying, Etc. 400.00 400.00 Travel & Annual Meeting 200.00 200.00 Insurance 3,000.00 3,000.00 Newsletter 1,000.00 1,000.00 Contingencies 1,000.00 1,000.00 Miscellaneous Total 0.00 0.00 11,900.00 11,900.00 Total $0.00 $0.00 $18,200.00 $18,200.00 Note: The 1993 Budget consists of $18,200 from assessments to member Cities. Fiscal Year runs from February 1 through January 31. ,bl > > :t: :::: r. :e .-, .::.. =- .- ::: :r. '" ~ -' r... - ...J1 =' ..... .....; 'J' :r. = ::: 30''; :.r. "" . -.:: - ~ "....J N ,.' :e '- .-, -..J :>0 ;;c - =: = C': (") r. r:;' '" =' =' .~ '.!"' x ::: z '"' , <: '" '"' F. .., ::: =: '" r. <> <..oJ N N \C - ::: = =: <: ~ ~ > - ~ n n ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ - N s;;: ~ :::; 0-: '"' ~ ,- , . ..: -< T': ~ N \C '- '=' ....., x '-' '../> -..J .:.. C r:-:" :t: ~. ;r. r> <: ;::- '"' :r. '-' - c ~ ~ -..J '..J1 '-' -..J ,- - - =' -. :e -..J N ::: .- ::: > ~ - ... - t.J\ - s;: '../> - - '- '::" N ;:: ;.; S N VI - - s;;: C'\ s;;: t.J\ ...... t.J\ - - - "'3SWt<<~ =0 f~l I~ x ... .J' :e = - = ,- ==:- ~ ;r. C'\ VI :::c N C'\ '..1> =' .- N '..1> <:: = ~ :r. - tL r> ~ '" c ::: ~ -'- 'J'": ,.., r> i'.,; .- ~ ::: - ;:: '..J1 ,- ::: - - ::: == == :.r. - ;;; ;:. :.r. <: '"' '< :r. ~ ,- \C :e t.J\ .- - - - - ,- - c VI - ::: =: ::: '" iQ.. :;:- '~ ..JI '= -.J ......l - '..1> :::: J' = eltoT L:t- Zi'? ~ :? '" :- ,- = - '- VI ,~ :::c x :::c N N ..J1 ..... -.J = X ::c = sa: II ~' ~ n .., ""' r.: ,... n <: (;. ~ 1;= '-= ~- ''';: ..., - - '- (..:.:; =--= :.:- -..J VI I~~ g~ - - c,...- :-..,: - ~-..: - - == ._r-... 1=:= 1- - - - 1- _ r.:= .: I":' r6....~J/(O :... - - < -- ,... - ~ .... < - .... ~ ....- 2:=: 2~ - -- >::: --'- ::>' => - -~ -"'- ;:> .ol~ ..-~~ ~?' ~= ,'. Z -: ,... - -- - . . > Z :-; > - ,... - z , . Construction Financial Services, Inc. 14525 Highway 7, Suite 145 ~1innetonka, Minnesota 55345 (612) 930-5149 Sc:r.:ing Financial Needs of Builiie7'S & Developers IRREVOCABLE LETTEK Or CREDIT NO lCl-:Z5 Dated December 23, 1992 Lower Rum River ~at2r Ma~~gemerlt Qrganizat~an Attention: Steven J. JanKcwski 15153 Nowthen Blvd NW Ramsey Minn. 55303 Gentlemen: we hereby establish ~ut IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT, numbered as indicated above, and effective immediately, in favor of the Lower Rum River Water Management OrganizatiJn (~he City) at the request and for the account of North Suburban Development Inc., a Minnesota Corporation (the Developer) in the amount of and not to exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and no/cents (25,000.00) as s~ch a~~ur.t is decreased as provtded below, available to you by your sight draft or draf:s drawn upon us in connection with Replacemen~ Agreement for the subdivision known as 5unny Ponds. It is understood that ~cr~h Suburban Development, Inc., has agreed to p~~vide this Letter of Credit as c s~rv~y to guarantee that all Gf the ter~s an~ :cnditions of ~ne Rep~ace~ent A;reement, which is attached neret~ end i~ccrpcrated herein by reference 2S ~xhibit ~IA:I, are p2~fcrmed by the Gevelcpe~ purs~a~t te the terms thereef. Each draft drawn unde: :~e L~TTER CF CREJIT Must be accompanied by: A. ,he originel 07 :his LETTER OF CREDIT. B. A notarized draft executed by the ~ha~rman, stating that the Dev21ope~ is in defau1~ sf ~~e .~ep1acemen: Agreeme~t, that the Devela:er ~~S failed to ce",~le:2 the I~provements in accordar;ce with the terms cf t~a Replacement ~gree~ent, and that the City is entitled to dra~ up:n the LETTER OF CR::DIT. Such statement shail set forth the work not comp~e:ad, the respect in wr.icr. the worK has not been comoleted and the a~CJnt required to cure such failure. Each draft drawn under :r.is LETTER Or CREDIT must: . 1. 6e signed or. behalf of the Lower Run RIver Water Management Organ1zation by the Chairman or his/her designee 2. Be in an a~our:t :0 cure the default by the Oeveloper to co~p:ete the Improvements, wr.i:h amount shall not exceed 525,000.00. 3. Bear on its face the clause "DRAWN UNDER LETTER OF CREDIT NO. lGI-225 Dated December 23, 1992. ~1/~5/~: 1::05 ~ 61: 4~7 t~:~ ':- ! T ',' ': F' ,~ H ~1 :5 E 'I P. ~); Construction Financial Services, Inc. 14525 Highway 7, Suite 145 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 (612) 930-5149 Serving Financial Needs of Builders & DerJelapers ~ Se presented for payment during regular business hours at our offices at 14525 Hiway 7, Suite 145 Minnetonka Minn. 55345, no later than 2PM on July 1, 1993. In the event of a withdrawal of all or"a portion of the aggregate funds referred to herein, it is understood that the Lower ?um River Water Managemer.t Organization shall use such funds for the purpose of meeting the Developer's obligations pursuant to the aforesaid Replacement Agreement and any excess funds shall be returned to this institution after the total fulfilment of the Developer's obligations as set forth in the said Replacement Agreement. We hereby agree that drafts drawn under and presented in conformity with the terms of this LETTER OF CR~GIT will be duly honored upon presentation. Except as otherwise expressly stated, thi5 L~7TER OF CREDIT is subject to the Un Horm Customs and Practi ce for Documentary ered its (the II Un Horm Customs II j . This LETTER CF CREDIT shall be deemed to be a contract made under the laws of the State of Minnesota and as ",atters not governed by the Ur.ifor~ Commer:ia1 Coce as in effe:t in the State of Minnesota. ihis LETTER OF CREDIT is not trar.sf~r5ble or c5signabl~ and is not issued for the benefit of any third p~r:y claimant. We sha1; not be called upon to resolv2 issues of fact or law between the Lower Rum River Water Management Organization and the Develo~er. ~O/'S-"" r-'o" -'N^'.C A' '-RWI"'-<:; I"C L. ., It,u~;;;"~~i. Co ~~ ,.1,,;:'_, ". BY 4~~dq- Pres.ident ~ --~ -'.--. ..----- f .: . I 7 L I ...I : , :. s: ~ .- e- . ~ .- ~ ~ 9L z ~ .A01.LflO I : =II:'C-- =~~ ;;;;r-:'- ......... 4Ci~':; r~ ;'3Ij;:;~~ ;: ~ 3S~!: "!-<.._t Q=~.; ~: :r~~:; ~ ~ .:~i'" .. h.J =~~..! ,'" j. >olS- , f' .c",~o" :J: .J Qt,a~: : E~=.~ Q ,fi~i~ g! ~~ii; _' -i'.. ~ ~ : I . _0 I ::2"~:'"~- :E.~"<~i ~. t.._c . 2.:1"" ~;5:: ::.g.n~ . .... ;'~~C. .~t~S 5;":''';' := It · :t ",.0. a,:% -0 CD 0..... !;.f". : 'Cc, ~ t'~~~ :: ~..;-~ .. ; ~~ ~ I ;=~~ Q ~ '" - . c: c 0 0." -. . . . ;;'" c . '" 1:"" :'"'< . ~ c. c ,~ ~ ..~ ~:2.. < .- . - '< - . ~ . . , . . c.. ~ i ~ ! :. ~ o ~ IR '- ' \~ ....... 1'.. "\ f "- 0. \, .- '----.. I I I I :;"=~nco := ~ g. ~ :.! o ,.;..6 -.::! ,.,. ~~ ;-~: : <:: . · c . . ~::J ~ r- '" "'. . o!. at::"....::-: : lie 1(;:"" . . . .. en"'~= ~!.:-~f <:I:J_- :.~~ ~.t't.= .. i1,;; ~ i ,'" ~!.~~ 0::-= _..:. _c Q. C2 ,... ...'" . -_.- ,QC'r.' c". .. '" "' . . "' . . \ \,J ;::;: '< o - ~ :rJ en i3 c cg Z ~'< Z 'V -<~ ~ Z m .... E .~ C') \J; sg 0 ,::::2Z ~~C So(/) ~~ o ; t:~ ~ r~"" = : ""'~ :~.. . ~S~ .. I oQ ~,.~~ . H ~CIJ - -_~r".' ~O,... ,:;u- " r_~ ~ --~ ~ :.....;: :<=tI) ::~ " . ~~ ~~ ~~ -e- C;~i ... -Q o. r.' "" . 0.... "", "". .. ;,...~ ~ :1= = = ;; ~= .~: "f :~.:. '; ;;...... .. -= ~ E-..2. -'" .- o.r . .. -;.;:. ;- ;, ..c:w;:_~ 0.4 --:e :ai~ . ,.. ,.. c. c . - ,..- _"C .- - . - " Co... c: "' [ ,.. 0", <: ,.. n "....~,'=' .0 ':),_ ..._, ~~j,~ (r T',.' O~ ~~NSS'..' ,=-. ::)4 REPLACEMENT AGREEMENT North Suburban Development, Inc., 8741 Central Avenue r-:.E., Blaine, MN 55434. hereinafter rcferr-...c to as the Developer, has filled 55.628 square feet of wetland located in ~-rw 1/4 of the KW 1/4 of Section 25, TO....l1ship 32N, Range 25W. The filling occurred under the cir.:u.4lSt2IlCeS which the Develope: felt were allowable under a nationwide permit administered by the Ann)" Corps of Engineers covering such activities. Nonetheless, the filling occurred witiiout a prior replacement agre.::ment required by the Minnesota Wetlands Conservation Act of 1991. The LRRWM:O has received and. reviewed a wetland delineation prepared by ?-ok John C. Anderson of W dands Data, 5 t. Louis Park Minnesota dated October 2. 1992. The afore mentioned ddjrleancn was quantified bj' Mr, Jeffrey Caine Rl.S as ShO....l1 on the attached Ex..hibit A. The deli!leation and qua.r:tification was reviewed at a meeting held on October 6, 1992 \I,:ith Steven Jankowski, the Ramsey City Engineer, Mr. Chris Lord of the Anoka County Soil a.'ld Water Conservation Service and Mr. Jeffrey Caine. The result of this meeting ended with concurrence of the delineation and a....-..a quantified as defined in Exhibit A with the exception of a darkened soil ar-...a appea...ing on aerial photo A.1\iO.925 which was utilized by Mr. Anderson in performing the: delineation. A request for review of wetland determination on this questionable area was made of the Board of Soil and Water Resources and was received in a letter from ~.r. Bruce Sandstrom d.1ted Novemba 9, 1992 recommending tha: the deputed area be considered for replacement at 5,445 square feet, roughly one half of :he ques:ionable area. Based on the above, the LRRWMO he:::by certifies that lost area is the amount of 61.073 square feet be replaced as follows: The Develop:: agr:es to i:n."l1ediately constr'Jet a sibtion pond encompassing 5.090 square feet as iden:ified on the attached Exhibit A er.titled Wetland Replacement Plan prepa.-ed by Jeffrey Caine RLS. In addition, the Deveioper ag:-ees to sub:nit a plan to the LRRV,:},lO by December 31, 1992 identifying the replacement of an additional 55.983 square feet elsewhere in the cL-air:age basin. Fol!owing approval of this additional replaccrrent ar: by the LRR\\:vfO, me Developer agrees to compiete the m.i:igation by June 14, 1993. Tne Developer agr-ees to provide a letter of credit in the amount of $25,000 to ensure performance of this agreement. Upon receipt of the le!!e: of credit, the LRR.WMO will lJ~fyrePla~men~'6r) ~ ~~ 'J-;vC i .., I r jZ-2.z--9z ~ II /1 Y Cj 7..- DaJ:: / ~t----- .~- . ,t. .. . , Permit Date Received LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED M1\NAGEMENT ORGANIZATION ANDOVER - ANOKA - COON RAPIDS - RAMSEY Permit Application for Construction A $500 escrow deposit shall accompany this permit. Applicant aCknowledges familiarity with LRRWMO rules, regulations, and ordinances. Permits are to be processed with the site plan, plat application, and approval of the city in which the project is located. OWNER TIlE ASTRA PROOECTS INCORPORATED PHONE 424-8525 ADDRESS 8525 Edinbrook Crossing, Brooklyn Park, MN.55443 APPLICANT THE ASTRA PROJEX:TS INCORPORATED PHONE SAME NOTE: The applicant assumes all responsibility for compliance with permit conditions. PROJECT NAME MINERAL POND 6th ADDITION ADDRESS/LOCATION McKinley Street and Chase Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE Residential and Park Development " PROJECT SUBMITTALS X Run-off Calculations X GRADING PLAN: InCluding contours and boundaries of waters. existing and proposed all wetlands and surface X STORM SEWER/DRAINAGE PLAN: drainage features and all features. Including permanent all permanent water quality EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Incl uding all temporary measures proposed to maintain all sediment on site. MITIGATION PLAN: Quality level of mitigated wetland(s) shall be determined by the LRRWMO. START OF PROJECT 1993 ESTIMATED END OP PROJECT 1996 PROJECT APPROVAL DATE: SIGNATURE OF LRRWHO CHl~IRMAN 4344 THE ASTRA PROJECTS, INCORPORATED 8525 EDINBROOK CROSSING. NO. 101 PH. 424.8525 BROOKLYN PARK, MN 55443 PAY II 'A.- ~ !,',lm" uJ;;:J<--"h u..~ kfi~ ~ ~ tJlu, /I 9 11-3/910 19~ $ ~ Q'O~ .~;;- 0-0 I C/'o- DOLLAI ...... Norwe.r Senk Mlnne.ole, N.A. ..... Mid/end Ol/lce NO"nA"BANKS 401 S.cond Av.nu. Sourh ::~:: Mlnnoepolle, loiN 8S41P . ron _ltL~c....~ 9'....1b.-ll-k..:;-- _~!oYJA G. C7V-~ ... M'" ., t t "' ,- n t'] 1 n n fl n , r: ,- ;J n t ? :t n :t II' WILLIAM G. PETERSON" L'r.IIN J. STARKMAN MICHAEL C. MJOEN JAI\1ES M. PALMQUIST DONALD J. SKEFFINGTON JR. WILLIAM PETERSON & ASSOCIATES;LTD~ ATTORNEYS AT LAW ~. DECErVfD III DEe 1 81992 8400 Lyndale AvellUe South, Suite 7 BIOOtningum. Minnes<>ta 55420 (612) 888.2400 ,- CITY Or: ANDOVER . Also admJllcd la Wisconsin FAX (612) 881.0129 December 17, 1992 Mr. James Schrantz Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization l685 Crosstown Boulevard, N.W, Andover, MN 55304 Dear Mr. Schrantz: . , Thank you for your courtesy when our office recently contacted you regarding providing of legal services to the Lower Ru~ River Watershed Management Organization. We are pleased to submit our proposal to you. We believe that: the enclosed package sU!lIIllarizes our background and what we could provide to your WHO. Mr. Mjoen of our staff formerly served as a legal adviser to the Wild Rice Watershed District in northern Minnesota up until 1987. As former chief counsel for the Minnesota Water Resources Board and as a former state legislator, I have a good grasp of many of the legal and technical issues which face a h~O such as yours. We understand that you will be establishing a deadline sometime in the future, At such ti~e, we would appreciate the opportunity to meet with the members of your board to discuss the needs of the Lower Rum River WHO and the services that our firm can provide. '. ( , r Thank you for your consideration. WGP/dmp encs. Attorney @ TOTHL P.Ol .JHN-~7-1993 14:44 FROM COON CREEK WATERSHED DIST TO ANDOVER ......:':...;.~.........:.'. - ..', ,.,'\\: - :. ';'. ........: .' P.Ol AGENDA .--:-/.;,. ....;.C.. .'. .,.,...(:;;;. ,.: ..0.:...:....:.::.:.........:.:. .:/1/'11 ?~ .",::. . . '~. " COON CREEK WATERSHED OISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS January 1" 1993 7:30 PM POLICY ITEMS Post.lt'" brand fax transmittal memo 7671 TD (J-t-k.~ co. A~?1c..NL Dept, PM"e . 1. Call To Order 2. Approval of Agenda 3, Open Mike fax, Fax. 155- 0975.. 4. Approval of Minutes ___ .' 5. Receive Monthly Financial Statements 6. Approve Bills 7. Designation of Anoka'County Union Shopper, Inc. as the Official Newspapers. 8. Designation of First Bank Coon Rapids as the Official Depository 9. Renewal of Engineering Contract 10. Renewal of Attorney Contract 11. Annual Review of Administrator 12. Anoka Conservation Oistrict Gauge Reading Annual Report PERMIT ITEMS ..DISCUSSION ITEMS " ...., .," . ' . ..:....'.. .....;... 13. Reconsider Involvement with the Urban Wetland Management Coalition Quarterly Objectives .. .14. ." INFORMATIONAL ITEMS . ,".'.'. . 15. Request from DNR for input in evaluating the Use of SONAR in Controlling Eurasian Water Milfoil 16. Update on Project 93-02: Lower Coon Creek Tree Removal 17. Rece;ve Staff Report . .. 1 a.. Update on CORE Recommendat ;ons: ..... . 19. Comments on Met Council Non-Point Policy and Program ;~20. BWSRPosit;on on Watershed Oistrict Boundaries '21. 1993 Wetland Conference: Friday, Februar'Y..5..1993 '., .;.:,"./::...:', Cloud; . R; nke-Noonan Law Firm . -' '. '. , t~f]~\~f~~~~:INess .. . .. '~.~~:.~ .'. . . >~.~~,~~~ ~..:r~;.: .:' ":", ..... .' "':",,' . .. ~.~ I U ril'lJ...'U'v'Cr"i. COON CREEK WATERSHEc DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS' HEETING December 29. 1992 The Boar~ of H4nagars of the Coon Creek Watershed District held their regular meeting on December 28. 1992 at the Bunkar Hille Activities Center, Present: Reggie Hemmes. Eldon Hentges. LuEllen Richmond, Paul Williams, Bob Boyum. Staff: Tim Kelly, Karen Potter, Ed Mathiesen, Hiehelle Ulrich Harold S1l9H, 1. The meeting was called to order at 7:39 PH Z. Aceroval of the Agenda: Richmond raised the issue of discussing Park Ccnstrvction in executive session. Richmond requested we a~d item .12 Metro ASSOciation of WHOa for discussion. MovGd. t:y Richmond, seconded by Boyum. Hotion carried with .flve yaas (Boyum. Hemmes, Hentges, RiChmond. and Williams} and no nays. 3. Ocen Hike: No one for ocen mike, Pol icy Items 4. Accroval of Oacemeer 1~, 1992 Hinutes: RiChmond noted a correction to the December 14. 1992 minutes for item .e, Aperove Bills it Should read that wllliams aSked about the times RiCk Johnson is paid. Hoved oy WillIams. seconded Dy Aichmond, Motion car~1ed ~it~ five yeas (Soyum, Hemmes. Hentges, Rle~mond. and WiIJia~s} and no nays. 5. 1993 Mee~in~ Dates: Y.elly explained the 1993 meeting dates at the Bun~er Hill ^ctlvitles Center noting that the July 13th date is a TueSday evenIng, this waS changBd Dy Bunker Hill Acttvitles .center. Y.elly also noted the 1993 meeting dates would be faxed to ABC news on Tuesdsy, Aichmond asked if it was necessary to schedule two meetin9s in December and if it was possiDle to cancel if necessary. SQecifically the meeting on Oecember 27th, Kelly ~eplied that the eoa~d can esncel if necessary. Moved Dy RiChmond to approve the meeting dates. seconded by Williams. Hotion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, RiChmond, and Williamsl and no nays. S. 1993 COSt of LIving Adjustment: Y.elly stated as part of the employ~ent a9ree~nt wit~ the District, an annual ~eview should be conducted ~y the B05rd. and a J~ cost of living adjustment aeproved to be effective January " 1993, For thiS to take effect the 905rd ~ust acp~ove t~e adJustment and forward it to the County. r.elly stated the COLA adJustment is secarate from the merIt inc~8ase, The District does have a new emcloyee, That emeloyee will be ellgiDle for a J' aala~y increaae at the end of the six ~nth proCatlon ceriod. Williams moved to spcrove the 3' COLA adjustment. seconded by RIchmond, MOtion Carrled ~itn five yeas (Boyum. Hemme.. Hentges. Richmond. and williams) and no nays. Soyum sug,eSted the annual review be discus.ed with the Personnel Comm'tte.. Wllllams stated h. ha. been involved With the hiring of r.elly and with the Personnel Co~itte. and at thl' tIme ht would step baCk, Boyum moved that RiC"mond be on the Perlonn.1 C~;ttee to replac. Williaml. A ~etln9 will be IChedultd witn Kelly, Richmond and Hemmes. HOved by Boyum.secondtd by Hentge.. Hotion csrrled WIth five yea. (Boyum, Hemme.. Hentgel. RiChmond, 'Ind Will 1_.) .nd no nays. .-;u.:;, " -JRN-07-1993 14:45 FROM COON CREEK WRTERSHED DIST TO RNDOVER Paqe ~. Coon Cree~ wa~er3~ed 013trict - Oe~embe~ 26. 1993 7. Park Construction Response: T~is was moved to the executiv8 ses~ion. Moved by Williams. seconded by Richmond. Motion carried with five yeas (Soyum, Hemmes, Hentges. Richmond, and Williams) and no nays. " Permit Items 8. Shield Pattern: Matthiesen ~resented the cermit review. Matthiesen stated the application is for eommercial development on 2.3 acres. The National Wetland Inventory Map shows this location as oossibly having a protected wetland on it. However, the aporoved qrading clan for Blaine Industrial Park second addition for 1979 shows extensive grading over this lot and it is unlikely that the NWI map indicates correct representation of this site. r.elly inscected the site and did not find any wetlands. Matthiesen stated he is concerned with the aocrova1 of the plan s'nce there Should have been a control structure built on the site which would control soil drainage. MatthIesen talked to the CIty of alaine and they wIll t~ke responsibility. for d9ter~ining t~e n3~ura of this structure at the Cities e~cense. RiChmond asked if there would ce any-water prOblems. Matthiesen res~onded ~h3t there is a IS' e~lvert fo~ overflow and it should no~ have any wate~ orOblems. Matthiesen recommended acproval pending a letter from the City of Blaine st4ting they will bUIld the control structure per the 1979 olano Also a draWIng Showing notatIon where the county dItch and the crivate dItCh meet and ~ 50 foot easement from the center lIne of the county ditCh is needed, Recommend:tlon for aporoval was moved by Wl111ams. seconded by Richmond. Hotien carried WIth five yeas (Boyum. He~es, Ment~es. RiChmond. and WIllIams) and no nays. Discussion Items 9, ReconSlder Involvement with-the Urban Wetland Management Coalition: y.elly gave an uodate from the meeting he attended on Oeee~oer 15th of the UrOan Wetland Management CoalItion. Hentges reouested that the Board fUrther discuss contributing financ;~lly to this eOalition. Hentges Stated this is a worthwhile organizatIon that is used for receivln1 and giving information. Richmond as~ed how many organizatIons the District needs to be a oart of and is concerned with stretching the District too far. r.e11y saId to think of the Urosn Wetland Management Coal1t;on as a tas~ force where we get alternatives and additional detail infor~atlcn with Some 10bOying. r.el1y stated Linda FiSher IS a land use at~or~ey and does lobOyin9 for the Urban Wetland Mana~e~nt Coalition. Wllli~ms resconded tnat we only have a genera1 descrIPtIon of the coalition and its goals,' and would li~e to nave more detailed Information on tne coalition. ~elly noted t~e UrOan Wetland M3nagement Coalition handout a~win9 theIr &tate~nt of issues. Boyvm moveo to table this until the Board can fur~her InveSti9ate the Issues. Seconded by WIlliam.. ~otlon Car~led WIth fIve yeaS (Boyum, Hemmes, MentQes, RiChmond. and WIllIams) and no nays. 10. COntInue DIScvsslon en Tenure and Rotation of OffIcers: Hemmes h19hl17hted the two ISsues IdentIfIed in tne eoa~d Me~; Ti~lng of tlectlons and tenure of the office. RIChmond Stated It would ma~e sense to apPoInt officers 'n May. tnen there IS tlM4 far t"e offIcers to get aCQuaInted WIth Issues of the Board. Hent1e. s9reed wltn RIchmond. will Isms Stated it is ~ard to rotate officers. keePlni s,mpl. rotatIon avoids hard feelIngs. _H.~s noted that we have a uniQue Board In that everyone i. ~tre and Inter,sted In tne ISlues at hand. BOyum mOvtd to elect offIcers In May of every Year. .econded Oy RIchmond. Motion carried with five yeas (BOyum. H'~I, Hentge., RIChmond and wIlliamsl and no naYI. P,03 ~~~" "G"'''''' ~vH I t.r<~HI:.D D I ST TO ANDOIv'ER P5ge J. Coon Cree~ Watersh~d Dis:rict - December 28, 1993 Hemmes re~iewed two actions for addressing the tenure of Officers. First to put the ~erson in charge who will get the jOD done: seCond. to rota:e positions. Harola Sheff spake on the legality of Changing officers and noted it should ~e reaffirmed every year. Hent~es noted a desire to have officers elected annually with no predeter~ined rot3ticn. Williams e~pressed concern that the District Chair not be personified and suggested UPdating the poliCy manual documenting what has been done witn the officers. Richmond moved to table the tenure issue at this time, seconded by Williams. Motion carried with five yeas (BOyum, Hemmes. Hentges. Richmond and Williams) and no nays. Informational Items II, UPdate on Pinger's Pla:a Structure Project: Matthiesen reported he held a pre~construc:ion meeting with representa:lve of M.B. Hiller Inc, ana Royal Concrete Produets. The concern IS the frost in t~e ground and the" time to meet the reQUIrements of the contract. ~3:thie!en sta:ed they agreed to ~hange t~e comoletion date of the contract to May 30. 1993 pending the Board ac~roval. Motion :0 aporove the compl@tion date to May 30. 1993 was moved ~y Boyum. seconded by Richmond. Hotion carried wit~ five yeas (Boyum. Hemmes. Hentges. Richmond, and Williamsl ana no nays. 12. Metro ^:socia:ion Of ~YOs: ~;chmond contacted the BWSP. and sCQy.e with 3 Jim regardIng the ~uestions on the QuestIonnaIre the board received. JI~ suggested :he Questionnaire be filled out with the concerns o~ the Board and state that another meetIng needs to be scheduled. He~~es moved that RiChmond WIll fill Out the Questionnaire and return It, seconded by RIChmond, Hotlcn Carried with five yeas (~oyvm. He~~es. Hentges. RIChmond, and Williams) and no nays. Heetlng adjourned a: 9:43 PH on a motIon by WIllIams. seconded ~y RiChmond. Hotlon carrIed WIth fIve yeas (Soyum. Mem~es. Hentges, Rlch~nd. and WillIams) and no nays. Pe,lnala ^. Memmes, PreSIdent P,04 TOTAL P.04 Family Life Mental Health Center Board of Directors and Staff . cordiaIlr,invlfi:ytitl'tlta reception 'I<i'l-:, . . , '''~,.c-?'i:" to celebra(~':fhe open~g of oaF~c;.w facility . i1~~~: . '. . '. . at . \~0{~\ 1428 Fd'th Avenue South. Anokt'Mfunesota r:~~A_ ! _' . /:':'!"-~r \WeCUiesday, January 27, 19931 ; ~<lt~rf~~;:":'~r"" J :("'~::_-,t-,, / "A:Od to 7:00 in the evenfug.'{ '-, " ':"V'Naklie Haas-Stclcct&;F: ..' r",) ;'-"~'~:"_''''~ _ , '_ _ c~_"';<',~~ " /. '. State of Minnesota Cb~ssioner of Htu~h ~nd Human' s~iVl~es ' ,- will officiate at the ~pCilii1g ceremony at 6:00 p.m. Your attendance would be a great pleasure. ."> " ...."