The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC September 19, 1995 " >' CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW, . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 Regular City Council Meeting - September 19, 1995 Call to Order - 7:00 pm Resident Forum Agenda Approval Consent Agenda Approval of Minutes Discussion Items 1. Public Hearing/Liquor License Fees 2. Public Hearing/Verdin Acres/95-22 3. Woodland Terrace Traffic Discussion, Cont. 4. variance/14015 Partridge Street NW 5. Livable Communities Act 6. Approve Removal of Illegal stop Signs/Green Acres & North- woods . 7. TIF Modification Resolution 8. TIF Bond Sale Presentation '\ V " Non-Discussion/Consent Items 9. Request for Proposals/Insurance 10. Delinquent utility Billings 11. Update for Anoka Electric Transition 12. Accept Withdrawl of sup Application/1714 Bunker Lk. Blvd./Bendtsen 13. Approve Encroachment Agreement/Lts 1-4, Blk 2, Jonathon Woods 14. Approve Driveway Access Agreement/95-8 15. Approve Plans & Specs/94-32/well #5 (Phase II)/pumphouse 16. Approve Final payment/SuperAmerica utilities/93-10 17. Declare Cost/Order Assessment Roll/94-11/Andover Center 18. Set Hearing for proposed Assessment/94-11/Andover Center 19. Declare cost/Order Assessment Roll/94-21/13920 Crosstown 20. Set Hearing for Proposed Assessment/94-21/13920 Crosstown 21. Declare Cost/Order Assessment Roll/94-27/14268 Woodbine 22. Set Hearing for Proposed Assessment/94-27/14268 woodbine 23. Declare cost/Order Assessment Roll/94-29/1519-148th Lane 24. Set Hearing for Proposed Assessment/94-29/l519-148th Lane 25. Accept Petition/95-6/ACCAP Properties 26. Accept Feasibility Report~Jaive Hearing/95-6/ACCAP Properties 27. Declare cost/Order Assessment Roll/95-6/ACCAP properties 28. Set Hearing for Proposed Assessment/95-6/ACCAP properties 29. Approve Feasibility Report/95-19/13748 Round Lake 30. Declare Cost/Order Assessment Roll/95-19/13748 Round Lake 31. Set Hearing for Proposed Assessment/95-19/13748 Round Lake 32. D. Brown Change to Permanent Fulltime Status 33. Assessment Contract Renewal 34, Successful Probation Period/D. Winkel 35. Rescind Assessment Agreement/Andover Partnership 1 Mayor-Council Input Payment of Claims Adjournment CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 19. 1995 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED ton FOR AGENDA Approval of Minutes ITEM City Clerk ton BY: Approval of Minutes Volk ~1 pl V. The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes: September 5, 1995 Regular Meeting , ) , / MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION DATE Senr~mhpr lq. lqq~ AGENDA fo.O SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Discussion Items ITEM fo.O City Clerk BY~ ~ J- Public Hearing/Increase Liquor License Fees v. volk ~~. I. The City Council has scheduled a public hearing for 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of a proposed increase in the fees for on-sale and off-sale intoxicating liquor license fees. The proposed fees are as ~ollows: \ ) On-Sale: From $3,500/year to $4,000/year Off-Sale: From $150.00/year to $200.00/year State Statute 340A.408 regulates the fees for off-sale licenses. Cities with a population over 10,000 can impose a fee of $200.00 per year. This fee would apply to JJ's Liquors and G-Will Liquors. The on-sale licenses can be determined by the city but cannot exceed the costs of issuing and inspecting and other directly related costs of enforcement. This fee would apply to Pov's Sports Bar. Attached is a resolution setting the new fees and a copy of the public hearing notice. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NO. R A RESOLUTION SETTING FEES FOR ON-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSES AND OFF-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSES. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: The following fees are hereby established for the year 1996: Liquor Licenses Off Sale $4,OOO/year $ ZOO/year On Sale " Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this I day of I 1995. CITY OF ANDOVER Attest: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk / \ J CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City Council of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard on Tuesday, September 19, 1995 to consider an increase in the license fees for on-sale intoxicating liquor and off-sale intoxicating liquor. All persons. desiring to be heard will be given the opportunity at the above time and location. written comments will be accepted prior to September 19, 1995. l(I~ ~~ V~ctor~a Vo - City Clerk j CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE !~~L~illb~~ 13, 1~~5 AGENDA t-n SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Discussion Item scot~ Eri~kson'hf Englneenng rfL ITEM t-n Public Hearing/Verdin Acres/95-22 BY: l?F/' 61.. The City Council has scheduled a public hearing for 7:00 P.M. for project 95-22, for the Verdin Acres area. Attached are the following: , * Resolution ordering improvement * Letter to property owners * Public Hearing Notice * List of property owners * Copy of original petition and map received by City / Note: The feasibility report was in the September 5, 1995 packet. Please bring this to the meeting. The original petitioned area had the following information: Proposed total number of lots - 11 Number in favor of improvements - 7 Number against - 0 Number unavailable - 4 The original petition also noted that the cost per resident was not to exceed $4,000 per lot. The estimated cost per lot is $4,651.00 which was based on actual contract costs provided by Bauerly Bros. currently under contract with the City. If the City Council proceeds with this project it will be necessary to approve a change order to the existing contract with Bauerly Bros. to include this work under their contract. , , MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ',' J CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W, . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 September 8, 1995 Re: Proposed 1995 Street Construction/Verdin Acres/Project 95-22 Dear Residents: A feasibility report has been prepared to determine the estimated cost to pave the streets in the above mentioned area. Discussion: The City of Andover has received a petition from your neighborhood to consider reconstructing the streets within your area. The reconstruction would consist of paving a 24 foot wide asphalt surface 2.5" thick on 4" of gravel base. The streets in the area presently exist as 22-26 foot wide rural section roadways consisting of fine sand and gravel. A public hearing has been set for 7:00 P.M., September 19, 1995, with the Andover Ci ty Council. / Estimated Cost: The estimated assessment to each lot is $4,651.00. This cost could be assessed over a 10 year period at about 7.0% interest or the assessment can be paid in full within 30 days with no interest. The petition which was submitted identified a not to exceed price of $4,000/per lot. Based upon the limited number of assessable properties at this location, the $4,000 estimated assessment per lot was not achievable. Assessment Period/Cost: The annual assessment payment over 10 years at 7.0% interest would be approximately is $54.00 per month or $648.00 per year. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or Todd Haas at 755-5100. Sincerely, a:Jd~ Scott Erickson, P.E. City Engineer SE:rja Encl. ') / CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 155-5100 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 95-22 VERDIN ACRES NOTICE is hereby given that the City of Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W. in the city of Andover, on Tuesday, September 19, 1995 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the making of the following improvements: Street Construction The property to be assessed, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429, for the improvement is within the following described area: - / All that area of Verdin Acres located in Section 4-32-24, Anoka County, Minnesota. The estimated cost of such improvement is $51,155.16. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed. improvement will be heard at this meeting. CITY OF ANDOVER .{~ 'db . Victor~a Volk -City Clerk publication Dates: September 8 & 15, 1995 04 32 24 42 0005 Paul & ~enelope Schreck 2760 - 177th Ave. NW Andover, MN 55304 v _ /32 24 42 0002 John & Donna Druley 2632 - 176th Ave. NW Andover, MN 55304 04 32 24 41 0005 Mark & Cynthia Storlie 2525 - 176th Ave. NW Andover, MN 55304 04 32 24 41 0008 Randy & Cathy Bates 2518 - 176th Ave. NW Andover, MN 55304 labels95-22 (Rhonda) , / 04 32 24 42 0006 Donald & Valarie Holthus 17680 Arrowhead St. NW Andover, MN 55304 04 32 24 42 0001 Allan & Debra Zembal 17651 Arrowhead st. NW Andover, MN 55304 04 32 24 41 0004 Paula Marshall 2544 - 176th Ave. NW Andover, MN 55304 04 32 24 41 0009 Thomas & Lanis Curtis 2538 - 176th Ave. NW Andover, MN 55304 04 32 24 42 0007 Nadine Brouillet 2690 - 176th Cir. NW Andover, MN 55304 04 32 24 41 0006 Terry & Sandara Kirchner 2557 - 176th Ave. NW Andover, MN 55304 04 32 24 41 0007 Gary & Carol Natterstad 2436 - 176th Ave. NW Andover, MN 55304 i (jj. ". --\,1'\.j . """-,,.~_.J:: CITY of ANDOVER ," Date: (fi:~lc?o No. Gentlemen: We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described area: Verdin Acres do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved by Constraction of City c:to,.PPtoc: ton h.. p"ved "t the cost of no greater than $4,000.00 per owner, and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota. ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION YES NO '-' This petition was circulated by: Valerie Holthus~ cal'Cl ~a.Hu-:<;}(J({/ Address: 0 17680 Arrowhead St. N.W., Andover, MN 553d4 , j :;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :;: ~ " ~ " ~ ~ c 2 ~ ~ in ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :0 in '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ x .. ~ " " ~ ~ ~ ~ in ~ ~ ~ U o ~ u ~ ::: ~ ~ ~ ;;; " C ~ x ~ ~ ~ C in ~ ~ ~ ~ in ~ ~ ~ o ~ " ;; U ~ " ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ K ~ :; o z !l 8 ~ ~ .. K o << ~ ~ ;;; ~ ~ .. ~ x c " '" ~ in " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z z " ~ ~ . > ~ ~ c. z .. ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ c ~ in w c ~ ~ G Z ~ ~ z o ;;; z ~ ~ ~ ! z ';: C K z z 5 " ~ ~ ;:, " ~ ------ ~ i@-.~~ ~ --I' IT!": ,-,11-, ,- '." ,.. ,- - -", 0 _~~..\..- ..' lit fC ,- -'--- 's- ~ "::- - - ,"- '00>, '- ., v:ll .,< .:;' i 'c \17U" "CIllO '800, i . _ _I Wrl r' "" / I Vik,..., : '" '" on," ~ \. 'm. "", ~ I;, ~ I ....:::::::: _80_ ~ ,,<iP ::oaso/,NSJ '" l I.""! \\ "I:; ,.,Ut' 2 \ ~ , ",,. ,.,u~ . rl -"'.w' ,...-', p' ' 1 .~... ~ I! ~ I ~ I 0 ~ 17"Ito I'''''' I ~'.1 ~ ~ "... I "... ".... "I.. "...' ! I ~ I ~ "... ".., ~ r: ' '::: ,~, ,~ _n --. "'.. . ,'.... m,. "n, ",... - ,,-::-~ ; I ~ I~. ~ ,,,.,, ~ ~ ,,- """ I '-1"',"&' . ; ,"'. ~ = t ~~ I ,,:;:. I'~ ."'~ 'a I. '/; -= rs, ~ "'L.",c:i'=' "If ' ol /71Z5 i: t . .:: E E ,_ ~ -I i__ "'.. .'h. .., .w , l ...!i,'" '" ',," ~ :- ;( '~~r:"" 4_ .., !.. 1._ .,:: L u"" j' I .... .. I! "" ;< I f';J"<f"; 1;>. '_ ~"'J ". _ _ ~ ' :".., II~I, cl ~ - .~,~.. , IL i I."~. I I : ~~. I ".,. ~ ~ <:::" !' c ! _, " r;117~ ,if!!' m);,,,. ::, 1'/ ! ~"1 , '';' .', ~ Xl ~,L~' i..,;,/::,//_ ill!I:.~ :,;;,,,w. I ~ \ ~ . 7' ,. _ ! ]) -'! ';'ij;i~! .\ni~m . ., '... "'- '..]- ,.'" -- "'1"" \,... ,," ~85 i!SJ5~,.. ::: ~"I E J....~ I~'" ;7/ ,::::' _ - ~,~-",... :;.... ! Iii. 7J;'. ~ ,,... ~ ,,.,.., I ,.., I--- . ..,.~{---. ;- .: "- . I ~ ~ I', - VI! ,6+6 '5" ,.38 ~..!..., . ."", .,0.2, , - fjf.::~~~ ~ -.. ! ! - 1 ~! 1"1 ~ ~ ";7+4 I~n y~ f-- ..", -1 y ~\.O.' . --' """ > S _'~ r f ~ ! I f Ii" ...i\ ~ _" <770 tt'mn ,6J1 ,,7< Z ")0 _ r:: ,/ ~"0I01 ! N_' ~~I~~lm 61>1......, ,"'I Inn I ! I .il _E "'" ,'y ~ "" ,~" L J .,...' '>... """. ,.'. . 1.-'1 ....,-" "",-,-~ .< I '. """ m., 1u7!-- . ';j .. ~ ,618 '51>2 25/~ \ ~ -. -:- ~...,~ ,...,// I' i' .. ~I ...,.....,.....,-""":: ":. I i I · ~-rJZ2,\> 'I '.,~ ..,{ '7roo ,...., ,..... IUA~" "'" )"'7' "':0' n.., '> .,. 'l' ","0 ~"'" ",. "'''_~,..o " ..... 1 r ,; , ::: 1,1. "'''' / .,n., , '''<'' i.! · I ~ ~ J':-Z; r; ;' 'o....c ~ :::,,," :" t .J... I~,.." I... ;;'''~~ i-... ' ~ b ',~ ; ,- ~'. "..... "", : n,,"J ~.,- J~ m.... ~I'r-. :: '_..__<:"" j~"'_" .". I - I ,- .".1._ \1 ..." "" r -I L ... '[." I~ I.." \(... ,--- e: """'- - I '/.." 'I':.. U ~ ,7o.ll n~ ~ ,UJ&{ I7f>>,.O ~117(UIO ~ 170" Ittz.,. '''h ..", ".71 ,~ '."'T- i- .".'" '.41f 16170 :Uh ~ . > ! ~-.......:::7f I i ~ I! I ~ ~X) . 11...1 ~ f I ~ I I I , I J-i1~..... !,..... ! ",- I,." ! 1m i 1''' ~ I ~ I r I f ~J I ! i : ,,.. In~~ --..J ~ i In ;; -=--aw - 'I , ~ -'''j! i I ! ~ _ I - ~ '..' '-- ,,"', ~ / .-..- ' o ~ :Z'u~" 31" 51 ,- ; .._~,t. 1; "'1' ~i1: ".. .- ~! '....~ I ~ ,="c-: 1- I J( "-'0 ~;:.. ~ ~ ":11) -- . ~ .; 13S1 J2~S ; :1219 ""'17 r t" !,." ~ I :... jt.~- '.,J" I"..n' I ---- i I 1! e c c (\. i ,-", CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION September 19, 1995 DATE AGENDA N:>. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Discussion Item Scott Erickson, Engineering J~ BY: WJch ITEM N:>. Woodland Terrace Traffic Discussion, cont. 3. On September 11, 1995, a meeting was held with representatives of the Woodland Terrace neighborhood to discuss the traffic issues in this area. Fourteen neighborhood representatives from various locations within the development attended the meeting along with Councilmember Jacobson. \ / The neighborhood representatives identified the main concerns to both traffic speed and traffic volumes through the neighborhood. discussed were the lack of sidewalks in the area and the problem traffic not coming to a complete stop at the stop signs. be Also of A number of possible options to control the traffic were discussed amongst the representatives. It was a general concensus of the group to implement some of the least costly options and to also install temporary traffic control devices and monitor their effectiveness. It was also noted that this is only a temporary trial and depending on its effectiveness and the response from the neighborhood other options may need to be evaluated at a later date. The request from the representatives is a two (2) phase request to be implemented as follows: Phase I 1. Install temporary speed bumps throughout the neighborhood (see Exhibit A for layout). 2. Provide additional enforcement (see Exhibit B). 3. Install additional signage in the area. * Traffic counts will be taken by the City approximately two weeks after installation. CONTINUED j MOTION BY: SECOND BY: j Phase II 1. After Phase I and traffic counts are taken temporary barricades will be installed at the locations noted on Exhibit C. 2. Approximately 2 weeks after the installation of the barricades traffic counts will be taken by the city. It was also requested that the City fund any costs associated with the temporary installation (see Appendix D for estimated costs of temporary installations). The neighborhood representatives, City Council and City staff will then evaluate the effects of the temporary installation after the data is collected. j L)(h,61 'f I} J . l I COUNTY -sTATE--A\IW4iiG"if.1'Av. n. 16) ",""..._",,,.. BUNKER-4:-~ ~lM>: '" 4">>:-':~.~. = -(;fi~-- - --~} t>.J 11~~' -~ ; t-: ,.i~~ ~'"":;:~~Y~~f.~ ~::~ -- - - ~ .., ~.--' f{} J.,..",. l~' ..!....$",A,O IT'l ~ _.s- t~ ,t cnl~! Z ~ ~A'..'~ "(!#:.",,:,'" . I _ - ~. - t- ~ - .- H \:.. :J,., ""MN I\.~.... 4_, --"f!:;~'~:'. i) (......r -/..,.". \; _. (V I ~ ~.. .._~,' -';';'iN ~h" .'1'. p'~::J.g~' (rJ. .~ ~"'." J.. "I't.nV;J.::: ---or llio"AY --~ ~ ,,1 ,CCl j~~"J; -", ,/ir'.' ntijr ~ , ,. ...(4)2~.~~ ~'\ -;J#,I"' ~:,. ~~ ~ - ~~: · :'.(ANE N.W. l,i . (I),.. iK ,,'.:~J::::~ I ~I~:)~t~~.:'....,., _" " '" ~ ~ . '5'(l~r. 7,,~$'~ ' (J,) ~~{;;J~ ,JI A, 'C'~ (.)..~ ~.. '., .+ l:l' '~..f It ~. ""'H' II:'IJ'II ~('.) 5 (4):"::S', " .. "" ... ~ ~~l/, n ~,"~' vl (J1{ I l' ('_') I ~~.. . -... .(") ... ~ "'L~V'':'I' " ."lI;J'"~ ~ ;:"'~f .~ I')." :~,ol". ~\' .) "I \ (t~;!oo. "0'2,' - 2"" ,~~ t~ ~J.J'';D :l)I~:J?.~~,: (r) m"~ , .'~" ,:~ '. ...... ~ ! ,'Q.,) " _' , ~. .......t .' '.... ...,":...." !;;.~..I \. ~.,1;:fl' .. '. ~.... ,01 15..1 ~)., oS. ;;.i.-- - NW. . M.. <"J {~ ., - JI... ....., r;'T.:';L ~'.., (7,') ~ 2' Il~-'Nf. 5-' ~... ~.' [ I' (.2"') . ~- ./lA ,(1C""o. ,:.:~ -.~ ...:.;~~; ~~"'" --- ;':CU' 116 ......... '~ K it ~., ~ $ U) ..~ ~ :....,.; ~ ~ 'M' '~,:1.., f\..tJ P,YJ, ',. " ,,) IIp,1 "ftf' " , ," ~.,,~, .'~', t - ';" . .r .... ~-> HI (~)'i (i1) I' f/ (0.). . '-(.. "I (.,~ fll) ~ t;'1 t~S;>J..~g J~ ~~..Io~!':"'{~ ;"f2,,~t ()O.:'J ;j. 24) (2J) i. 1 ~ /) (II) I' r'\J:'l >- (lJ I,~' .,T"~';I!"'" ..,,, _: .O<!~. ~~ '0 ' 0 -r,O'N 7 · " o~.,:u" 7 A Jt:/. R: ~~~l,1!,!' , ,I<{.oj)~ ~t,(l')7 I ...., ~ Al f?' 'I '(g) -~ (;,) (;.)' ~ j-:' o~"R j 0$') M ~ ($>) 0 ' ("J I' " (0) ~ l"{'-C. 1. ... ... 0.. ....- 1"~';-'~~1'rq riD~1t ~ It ~~)~l.V1)~ ~ ,.,.- ~:~. _ _ ~ TH~ \; L ,NE N.~. _ _ t~. : .'iOQ,I1 '~t~~. -9.'._";)0 .pn_~ ~(lI~~. I \ (0') ~ too (t.l) I k ,) (,,) (i1) 1($') (ir) \. '<lJ. .'PRA~f oi'': \.;. -".' \~ ~,)o MfI. '. ,.('.,. Iltl" 2' le4 $ . ',~I~..,lI',"~."~'l:.,.. "...~..~(~~, 4),';, (""._ I . _ 1 A "I ~ ' ",: ,;"yrN ~ ,\ ,~nJ'o..<"~,i-~ ~ i~ ,', J/O "'- .. _1. ",-I. . ..,~ ~nv ~~ __ :--~.-:'" ,,(.1. ...., 'IH"_ '" ~ !, 'U'",- ~"JIJ/:">'..."!~I' (.,T' '~:;~I")/':' '.~'o _ ~iif--ftJ-T~~~..h" 4 li '-(I) - -r-----~..-' t,,,\'~~),~D..tf~~~ ~:~ -.~:'~~ .~(-'~~t 'Mr./I'.l'~;A;1' l.;rn. ~. " ~S~/) In ' ,~ :U ' ff1" Il' 1""/ ,~ H 12 .";'A7 _, II 12.. L~ J4w '/:,f ~.'IL.' .~___J... '" -Ii)' (I:) ... C_,r. Pn ~,.) f'J (~J ."""'.-1"/~~~~~ ..-,j~MIIt' (.t'..JV.11l1 ~~~.'''':.":It~ ,'~.1;;~ :s ,,1't- - ~ - r_,' r,' - III t I'JAR( ~ . ~,.... f.\ ,-} , I I .:: if 135 T~ to E. N, W. 'M J- I . (,;:"'~ ~MARIGOJ.n: '-'" t: .~:~~"< l.--::" ti .f1.) ;;')', (;), (.;;) tl(';') ":-; ~, (~) ,~r'&l (,;): ~~.- 1 ;. ~'~d:';/~:". ..~. '.SF J'~,.~> ;'r, f ~I) C ('. ,. .;::1 I' I..) . >) 5 .~ .~,~: 14 (It)....: ..~...~~ ;/~ gll I nl{)fr oN 4 ~ ~ $ ~ A 'D't)'~ .; 4 c.. $ ~ ~! ole (I) It ..r_ 9 /~ (If) ..' v.;"'.... ... :~,~~ . ~ ..... . "4. ~J .. '.l' 6 l A... /2(11,~ J If"~: ~~. '::'!;~:.-_. ~ JUd ~ "Y') ~ c,~ #. ~CJI) ; .~" J"'~'" '"" " /8r;.) I; ~~ ~"t" 1:<':;: r-.,-;"-- ,::.; " "'I II "'j J;;'id (_) · T A~. .. .~J,'1r(l1) ~ IO,~~' 11(-I9~ _'~ ~...- ~ r'-" I; .,,~ -. ,n ..~ n'~, 1 . ~ PARK ,'., 'r 5,"' ~ ,_. ' ~iJ:~,i' (J) "'" ~;'" ,~,'" .~..~ ''')'~''''.l'''~'\ I (;oj - r "~ ~ .~~: . 0 -' 1 ,'r-~ ~- · ~ It' _-:' I l'~..l'l':::;J 4 !l $ '.' ~~ 8 e, I ~, ,", ~-~ .....781"_\. P ...,:0".;1 ~ .1 .'~ ", - . . _,; '. .' 'I " (.) t ';',". lSS"1";,"., ~ _ ,S"'''.'7f''- _:://.- I~ 2~~. ,.)...~ ~. t .,/, .. "~~": 41:l' "'''P''~.' /Pd:/j V 06'" ~ O'~ }cr\~ O~, ",. L- - - -, .,1:~" r:\ ii' -,.L:' .. - j _~...~ l (" .4 '\.' (} l.,+ ~ -;;':~::. .~:,. cM'~ 8 t, J.. I{:'fj .. ~ ,,: .... J I ~:. '.M--,r.__ ~.tI4TH I ~4'" : ", \. ,I~t .....$ ~~ ~~jJ-,I.'I......,~r:~., .:~ .:'-'..1' ~ ::r lIT JIll #I: <I:IU :'..,~ ,.;,~-r.:,,:'':.1 ,.~~ I.W.~. ~: "",," u'~.A .~ ~" . _ 6)~ TI'J ,I ,"'''II. ,I /1 'f11 .,;;- - \: I~ 0' 11_:I'J~r;, IJ p",...... ~ ,OJ" j- I~."I'I "'S-'.,.. rn ,:I', -'" '~l I, I .~~"'.o(l ""'-, fo!.'''t ~~~ <p.j~ '~~'11~I.i~!J 'tio ~ ~J '''" ..... ~. Jt"rl2,. l, ~~:cJ.. "'".l' .' ~"'O'4-1 ." ~, tl ..,- ~lt I Z "',;.1"" 5 '}' ~ .., 1M) ~~ P.)\t ,V' ~ ""~J]'(' ~ ",~~I) ~~, ,~:....t ~ oj;.. '"' l "'"'... 1'("" .,..,-'" ., ~ .....J ~.I""; -. .. \,1..., tI ',t> \1i,Z3 li"'~ 1W1.~\" ......,J .~.; .,'T $."'" ..,"~ I' .tPtIJ',. l-!' I (fl'~!-cJ H ~~ ~6 I,..,' .... I. .If_ -"_",; ,,1 ...q""J,.... ~ fA) ~ ,,'~ "f'(4fj J.J~, ~"'-10~ ~,~ f . toO..: l. 9 i!J 10/:.... If: .".:, of. ~.; ". ._~ ." f'?7 oIl\".....;:...)~ .11' 'I,'" -.. t (iI)1 . 2 l ,.w" 't. ......,; ~ ,. :n? IU~~ ;"I~f"'l .,,'.... /",. ,.,...... !' '4.1) .q- '2':2.:) 11#) Mf:;t':'~~'=~\I7~ '''~ !!~,/~It h ,.... . ~?!.6~"'\~ ~ ~ ... ....~~...~~. ..1~~~f l'6; -<..:t't""-A",:!I.J1:; ;~~ :h("'~~ IU'~J, "21'20;) "Jr~"'q "J,~,. ,^~%7' 1;1' ~'4.'" 't ,.,,'. '.n. "of .J "~ ~ ,. ~ f~ ~ 18.. ~'_~I;'II':fl_',,;Ji:J,II"d' ,,,~ IS;' -..., I ~ I~.'.i# '~\:1#4 e.\'l \'l'~":'~. 1a~,~,^ t .'~ JlI ..... u)o- ~ ,. ,.,:s.... I~~-,...' ~ 1'.1'1' .c.. .... 'M~N.'" ,~... ", v ,0 ~,- ~". ;1', ~ , ,. ,. ,. . ,. ....... i"-~'" ~, ':1(- !~ -C-p, ..........---,. tlL.A'" tI9' I:......... (),# OV...iI("'J~~ ,'19 ':"'~, ~ f,'t.... .... !lL'__::J33 RD. LANE N,W. '~:.L".J.~tr-n'="~:"33~ · .,,11 f&1J(R.~CE: ,:M) . _ ..afldJ...; 'i ~'I'.:..g". .'" ..'I,i ". ~.:.~- 4"'''''''' ~"'_qJ __::;':~~.\~J'~';_~i"i.1 ~.)...... 4 .'{P) ,~~ . if't 'J. ~~ C' ~...,"jI7~ '(f~ ~ .--.. :.''''/,(1'.:, S! i':f~-~ ~..; n,;~ ~~!\J8F:" I 9 tl'f"~~~':~\O~~~ l. ''', '<t '~". ,'~llr11.' .~ II"', ~'~~r IJ).1.:'I,; I \c, ~~ lJ!. .., ~~~_,.t! ~ :~"'i" 1'r.'Io" ..."..,. M',7J '\ '!"". ~ ., ___ . "'~s,~ "n_1I I I g'" 'll'H=J(' I.. ,I ...,. ~ t' ,It ..~t; -;:':.. j1i .:i:'-:'~:". ..,0,::,00 I~" "u; 1.1 .-..... G . ....ft ~ . i I ',. ......._/a... '". )(i,~s.~",t ,.... "101- I" i ,CJ I -""~ .~ ," a' . ~'.a:,' 'of:' l 'J'.-'7".!l'.R" -"'j." "'15/ 1II f-7.-.i I:! -.?/'f '.,. f1i.. .' 4'7",,' j...:"~i 'I _u.~ ,i.2N..j ~~, .: ,~.: : t \./ ,..l'!~ T.......~~~ r~: "i~~. ~ I. ~,.v:m ~...Ij::,~iI ' I /.,.~,,: -... '.0',. r..~. "t (l) I" ~ ~ -'~\ ~: -/ t....'~ 7(.:~d.. 0/ ,~ l!t'; (/l ...t~.. ~"IJI~:i",;:.:,,\ojl" 1:' 2~ ~?1.1If1E':t-........;.;< ~ I ~ ,,: ~'r._ /~~. "II: ~ ~.. .' _:p)...'S I ...... 11'1!~:":"'.... (AI). . ~ l /I) ,.,~ ;fl~:;~ .~14.jtl'4 " . * ~."',;.;. ~.":I" t '-;" I" v '>~ I"/.~!(' i~j~! : ~ ~,l t., "'''-rJ>.~L::Jl: ,',,. ';;-1. u;. ....~ vI "~"';3" . :.;._ ':. l,' . '4 "" ~ r-' ^ ~lI,~.JI" N' ~ ,~~f j, 41 ... '\.:~ FT 11<0#1.....'...1 0: \~ ~ In., II .. It '\ <,.~ "..~ # ' J{~) ~v t' f t. ,",.,~ ~'l ~i t . I ~.,.;'(~,f\o \10~"'" i1t.I IS '\.tI!' .!.:n. I~ ..'I..... _ _ ~ ,.-; I~I __, tt St ~... _ _ \. .__... .~_w.. ,LIt'IIS 1'~'F 1 T'Y 12, F(~'AN ,,;-.v. .<t.Z _~ \..."n ",-,$ t f ,,. ,it'" ,.Il.....,w~ JO*::"._ 4j" ,." 1'I..~1f "VI..J. ..... .. "'" ~... fd",t,..I? "" ~_ III ~ .. -- ... @:L - -- 8 P"":."~"..., @ @ E. I~) '~4 .........,....1' .1't....II,....:L.Y, _ ::Trod- '" I, -s r;.v,P~ t',-I -7"........1 s...,.......p L~(.c.I,::-'- (7e:~I'O"O-7 ) . EXHIBIT B / CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W, . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 September 14, 1995 . Captain Len Christ Anoka County Sheriff's 325 Jackson Street Anoka, MN 55303 Office Re: Woodland Terrace Development Dear captain Christ: The City of Andover is currently experiencing excessive speeding in the above mentioned development. On behalf of the Mayor and City Council I am requesting that periodic speed controls are done. Consider this a priority objective of the city. Let me know what can be done by our department regarding the speeding in this area. Please contact me as soon as you are able to discuss this situation. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, chard Fursman City Administrator RF:rja Encl. cc: Larry podany, Anoka County Sheriff's Office LIX L OIL' Z I I ADD TION I . Y HI Y ~ ~ ,/ ~~~L~ JL II I;,.:: ">ILJ, ,. C1Iuff:II ~ u I!i..: !.L ........ 1T.~.1 I' ...l"""":~1 I' ~ll:"~~:S 'c.' , ':S ~,a~~ --1..:.~ ~.,., 1 ,1'1 "C!I~ltr~,--\ ~ 'M ifl '] .,JR, lD.I - i nr~ "- ~ Anon L ^.... ,,.L - ~;~~ - ~ "'. · ,. .,..,. I":),.' ~ ~ NHmb{f.. ...::--i.' 7r;j ~ "'1' \ ~ :"'ANI.S . = I-"'.~' ~..;- ,t ~ ..::_liif-.... ~ :II~ rj~-~ ~- ~ ).. D Ifjf'j" TH 1nIJ,7 -, ;t;!:;1t ~ - I ] ~ ~ I" IP -I'" . Ii,'. "'.. ,T. ''D'':; ~;;1 lC:, H l"~;;; "~;;~~i ,~,~; ~;:;~;.~: =-:" ~ ~".:: ;=~~ ;t fl '~. . . :".;:':;;;: ::;:;;;:;;: ;1..' ~;.E!. '- z ~ ~ ~.T l..t ~ ~~. · · I)i,.,a ,j:~:;. :{if' ;;;1 :;~.!!rm ~-~ ~ ~''Di!~' ~!::> :~I' ~i~~r'~d~ /33 ~ ( l: ~..~ ~'.~ ~~; , ~~'_~QJ ;~~ \: IW~~. rz~r I.r ~ ~. ~ , "!l ~. ~ I ~~ ~~p.~t} -Hi\z I,a ~"'~ z -" r" ~ A , 1-'/ ~ ~ "r . , f..!-I ~/~;~I ~gfZ,mv*tLg~L;;1H4 .:i=l ~J( '"' u,. '" . -~~L\lEROO Cl. ., ,.--u, ~ . ~.~ I ~'~ r-4-I . " Il ~ It:( ~ ~~\,," ,," '/7 ~ I QI oF_,_ .\".....,. ,. -J' ~~ ~~o ~~ ~,I.~A;, 21(,'" I ~ -LzJ I' .. -" I" ,-_. _.,_.,-- '"'2111"1"'1)'132\.1'1,,, .- ,..... .T'+[I1112 1\ 10 9f. 71d2l1.ol"jra;: ....... , Hi ~ . 1 ~I' · ) ,~:' 1.121')~fk,~lj. .. , ~ rtWOOOL:4NO eRE. :;;I~ ) -1;"1,,00\,,,"'71 iijiior~' 7 . 4 H IN l-- l\- ~pll : · I, IzlJT4T. ~ . ) 4 S" r . !i4 I e t is 1" S , oeEPTr:- )'!t41'11\7 ~ '4 ;.'u- i7t '3" t. ,1'."1 ~_. ~dJ..,.. T.:'tT ~ ~ ~"" . a . CnxJk<<l Lat. .. Sc/IoQ/ ~ 4 - M<<1dorr en.tt /JqIfiof C1Iuff:II - ,- - , , . --=-- 6\ ~ f 'Ii) a ~ '\. .0 l~ ~ \J oJ 0 \J ~ '...{ '" ~ .... "'<) .J Il "i V) ,oJ l;j ~ ~ ct~ ~ o BUMPS/HUMPS CHAPTER 24 " Speed Bump Speed bumps and speed humps are raised areas in the roadway surface which extend across the roadway perpendicular to the traf- fic flow. Speed bumps are generally 3 to 6 inches high with a length of 1 to 3 feet (shorter than the wheel base of an automo- bile). They are typically used in low speed parking lots and alley situations. Speed humpst on the other hand, are generally 3 to 4 inches high with a length of approximately 12 feet (longer than the wheel base of an automobile). Ejfects Volumes. Speed bumps and speed humps will often reduce traffic volumes on the streets where they are employed. The degree of traffic reduction is dependent upon the number and the spacing of the bumps/humpst the amount of cut through traffic, and the availability of alternate routes. Speed bumps/humps have been used to deter trucks and larger vehicles from using a street. Speed. A speed bump causes significant driver discomfort at residential traffic speeds Neighborhood Traffic Control Januarv 199.\ / 24-1 and generally results in vehicles slowing to 5 mph or less at the bump. At high speedst bumps tend to have less overall vehicle im- pact because the vehicle suspension quickly absorbs the impact before the body can react. At typical residential speeds, speed humps cause some driver discomfort and result in most vehicles slowing to 15 mph or less at each hump. At higher speedst the hump tends to act as a bump and severely jolts the vehicle suspension and its occupants or cargo. Speed bumps or speed humps should only be installed on streets where the prevailing speed limit is 30 mph or less, These devices generally have a continuous effect on vehicle speeds if spaced at less than 800 feet. Once spacing exceeds 800 feett the effect on speed is only in the immediate vicinity of the bump/hump. Traffic Noise, Air Quality and Energy Con- sumption. Traffic noise is generally reduced slightly between the bumps/humps on low volume local streets. At the speed bumps/humpst experience has shown ~~"/-'r" ..........'.'.'...".....'ii.>;.:<...... .. i;h~;';"--' . . ~~ '- / -, ~:" // / -/ / r / ,- anywhere from a slight reduction in noise level to an increase in noise level. The noise level at the bumps/humps is dependent upon the speed at which the vehicles traverse them. Because of their effect in slowing traffic, bumps/humps tend to have a negative im- pact on air quality and energy consumption. Traffic Safety. Traffic safety has not been found to be compromised with speed bumps and speed humps as long as proper design and installation procedures are followed when they are installed. Traffic safety benefits can be gained if speeding is involved. Community Reaction. The initial reaction of the people living in the area of the installation is generally positivet while negative reaction can occur from those people who produce through traffic trips in the area. The reaction of the people living in the area can change over time. Legal. As defined by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, speed bumps and speed humps are not traffic control devices. They are geometric design features and should be designed and installed accordingly using accepted engineering principles and judgement. Cost The cost of constructing a speed hump has been found to be in the range of $1,000 - . $2tOOO. Speed bumps cost approximately $500- $1,000. Neighborhood Traffic Control January 199-1 24-2 Additiollal COllsiderations The impact on maintenance activities such as snowplowing and street sweeping is mini- mal. Speed bumps/humps can significantly im- pact large truckst transit and school buses. If used on regular routes of these vehicle typest attention should be given to informing these drivers of proper operation necessary to min- imize impacts. Case Study A series of three speed humps were installed on Homestead Drive in Appleton, Wisconsin. From a technical standpointt the speed humps were effective in reducing the 85th percentile speed from 34 mph to 26 mph. One year and five inonths after the installation of the speed humps, they were removed. The removal was prompted by a survey of the neighborhood residents who directly abutted the street that the speed humps were on. This experience allowed for two winters of main- tenance and found that their presence did not create any unusual street maintenance problems. It is interesting to note that the vehicle speeds found to exist prior to the installation of the speed humps returned after the speed humps were removed. References Institute of Transportation Engineers Residential Street De5ign and Trarfic Control A Proposed Recommended Practice of th. Institule of Transporu- tion Engineef5 by tlle Tedmical Council Speed Humf'9 Ta5k Force Guidelines for the Design and AppliGllion of Speed Hum~. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 19, 1995 AGENDA SECTION NO Discussion ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA 4. Variance Fence Height 14015 Partridge st. NW Loren Kuch Planning ~ David L. Carlberg Planning Director BY: ITEM NO REQUEST The City Council is requested to review the variance application of Loren Kuch to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.21, which allows a maximum height of a six foot fence located on property line. Mr. Kuch has a nine (9') foot fence that was constructed in 1983 located on property line. The property is located at 14015 Partridge Street NW, legally described on the attached resolution. For further background information, please review the attached / staff reports and minutes from the August 8 and 22, 1995 Planning and Zoning Commission meetings. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW The Planning and zoning Commission on August 22, 1995, made the motion to recommend to the City Council approval of the variance request. Attached is a resolution for Council review and approval that reflects the motion made by the Commission. / MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -95 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VARIANCE REQUEST OF LOREN KUCH TO ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 4.2l WHICH REQUIRES A FENCE IN EXCESS OF SIX (6') FEET IN HEIGHT TO MEET THE MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK IN THE ZONING DISTRICT IN WHICH IT IS LOCATED TO ALLOW FOR THE CONTINUED PLACEMENT OF A NINE (9') FOOT FENCE LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY LINE ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14015 PARTRIDGE STREET NW, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 3, BLOCK 4, RED OAKS MANOR 4TH ADDITION. WHEREAS, Loren Kuch has requested a variance to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.21 which requires a fence in excess of six (6') feet in height to meet the minimum required building setback for the Zoning District in which it is located to allow for the continued placement of a nine (9') foot fence located on property line on the property located at 14015 Partridge Street NW, legally described as Lot 3, Block 4, Red Oaks Manor 4th Addition. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request does not meet the criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04, however, due to safety considerations regarding the pool the commission feels the variance is warranted; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the variance requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and hereby approves the variance requested by Loren Kuch to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.21 which requires a fence in excess of six (6') feet in height to meet the minimum required building setback for the Zoning District in which it is located to allow for the continued placement of a nine (9') foot fence located on property line on the property located at 14015 Partridge Street NW, legally described as Lot 3, Block 4, Red Oaks Manor 4th Addition. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 19th day of September, 1995. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk R~gular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting '~inutes - August 22, 1995 /:'age 4 @ VARIANCE CONTINUED - FENCE HEIGHT AND DECK ENCROACHMENT IN REAR YARD _ 14015 PARTRIDGE STREET NW - LOREN KUCH Hr. Carlberg reviewed the discussion at the August 8, 1995, meeting =egarding the variance request for a 9-foot fence along the property line at 14015 Partridge Street NW. The fence was constructed in 1983, 'but Staff could find no documentation on the deck or fence. There is a permit for the pool, and there should have been one for the deck. The Commission questioned the setback of the deck at the August 8 meeting. Staff has found that the deck is located 7 feet from the rear lot line. ~he minimum setback requirement is 10 feet; however, at the time it was built, the minimum setback requirement was 5 feet. The change in ~equirements occurred in 1990. Technically the deck is a legally non- r.onforming use. If the Commission agrees with that interpretation, no "ariance is required for it. Mr. Carlberg stated the question still remains with the issue of the 9- :oot high fence. The maximum height for a fence located on the property _ine is six feet. This was built at 8 feet and another 9 inches added. :f the Commission is in favor of a variance, Staff's only concern is ~hat it may open the door for additional fence issues. )~oren Kuch, 14015 Partridqe Street NW - stated he is not the original o~ner of the property but is of the house. He installed the pool and ~ence around it because of the issue with youth getting over it. If the :'ence is lowered, children will be able to get over it as they did Lefore. The rationale for the additional 9 inches was to place a spike on top so children couldn't grab it and climb over. Commissioner Apel was still in favor of the variance, feeling this is an issue of one r:eighbor trying to get back at another. The fence was to\- keep the children out. He did not want to be a part of requiring him to lower it -::0 six feet, creating the possibility that someone will get hurt. Consideration must be given to the safety aspect. Commissioner Luedtke did not feel a variance should be granted just because the fence has been there for 12 years, but he is not in favor of cutting it to six ieet around a pool just so it is in compliance with the ordinance. I10TION by Apel, Seconded by Luedtke, that the Planning and Zoning Commission forward to the City Council a Resolution approving the ',-ariance request for Loren Kuch. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission determined that said request does not meet the criteria of ~rdinance No.8, Section 5.04, we do feel, howev~r, that even though it does not meet the letter of the law pertaining to the ordinance, the safety aspect of the fence remaining there is so important to the issue ,,_t hand that the Planning and Zoning Commission feels that the fence should stand. The Planning and Zoning Commission hastens to add, i:owever, that the only reason the variance is being considered is the / safety aspects of the situation. The Planning and Zoning - Commission coes not condone fencing being built contrary to the ordinance. This particular case is a very special case, however. Motion carried on a 5- -'-es, I-No (Squires), I-Absent (Peek) vote. This item will be placed on -he September 5, 1995, City Council agenda. \, CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION August 22, 1995 DATE AGENDA ITEM 6. Variance Continued - Fenc Height & Deck - 14015 partridge St. NW - Loren ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning _uch BY: David L. Carlberg Planning Director APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY~ REQUEST The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission tabled this item at the August 8, 1995 meeting and requested staff to research the deck setback and if a variance is necessary for the deck in addition to the nine (9') foot fence. The deck in question is located seven (7') feet from the rear lot line as stated by Mr. Kuch at the August 22, 1995 meeting. Staff has found the following: 1. No permit was obtained for the construction of the deck around the pool. The Building Department believes a permit was never granted for the deck. ',2. A permit was granted for the pool only on July 7, 1983 (permit attached) indicating the pool must be fenced during construction. No permit was issued for the nine (9') foot fence and no other record exists regarding the fence. A permit was issued in June of 1983 for a cement patio and roof. / 3. 4. A permit ~as issued for a 12'x30' shed on August 1, 1993. APPLICABLE ORDINANCES Ordinance No.8, Section 4.06(B), Permitted Encroachments, states, "In side and rear yards (not along a street): detached outdoor picnic shelters, living rooms or patio decks may extend to within ten (10') feet of a side or rear lot line except that no structure shall exceed five hundred (500 s.f.) square feet". This Section was amended on November 6, 1990. Previously, a five (5') foot setback was required. Ordinance No.8, Section 4.21, Fen~es and Walls, states that, "Any fence, hedge or wall in excess of six (6') feet in height shall meet the minimum required building setback for the zoning District in which it is located". In this case the setback would be ten (10') feet. ,Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04, establishes the variance procedure )and process. Variances may be granted where there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in any way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of the zoning Ordinance. The hardships or difficulties must have to do with the characteristics of the land and not the property owner. Page Two 'Variance - Fence Height & Deck /14015 Partridge street NW Loren Kuch August 22, 1995 COMMISSION OPTIONS The Commission must make a recommendation to the City Council on the fence variance. The Commission should also determine if a variance is needed for the deck based on the discussion at tonight's meeting. A. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend approval of the variance requested by Loren Kuch to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.21 to_allow for_ the continued placement of a fence located on the property line exceeding the maximum height requirement on the property located at 14015 partridge Street NW, Legally described as Lot 3, Block 4, Red Oaks Manor 4th Addition. The Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the conditions established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04. B. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend denial of the variance requested by Loren Kuch to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.21 to allow for the continued placement of a fence located on the property line exceeding the maximum height requirement on the property located at 14015 partridge Street NW, Legally described as Lot 3, Block 4, Red Oaks Manor 4th Addition. The Commission finds that the proposal does not meet the requirements set forth in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04. The Commission finds that no hardship exists due to the unique shape or topography of the parcel and that the land owner would not be precluded reasonable use of the property. C. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends Option B. j CI':'YOF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -95 A RESOLUTION DENYING THE VARIANCE REQUEST OF LOREN KUCH TO ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 4.21 WHICH REQUIRES A FENCE IN EXCESS OF SIX (6') FEET IN HEIGHT TO MEET THE MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK IN THE ZONING DISTRICT IN WHICH IT IS LOCATED TO ALLOW FOR THE CONTINUED PLACEMENT OF A NINE (9') FOOT FENCE LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY LINE ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14015 PARTRIDGE STREET NW, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 3, BLOCK 4, RED OAKS MANOR 4TH ADDITION. WHEREAS, Loren Kuch has requested a variance to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.21 which requires a fence in excess of six (6') feet in height to meet the minimum required building setback for the Zoning District in which it is located to allow for the continued placement of a nine (9') foot fence located on property line on the property located at 14015 partridge Street NW, legally described as Lot 3, Block 4, Red Oaks Manor 4th' Addition. WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request does not meet the criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04; and ( WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council denial of the variance requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and hereby denies the variance requested by Loren Kuch to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.21 which requires a fence in excess of six (6') feet in height to meet the minimum required building setback for the zoning District in which it is located to allow for the continued placement of a nine (9') foot fence located on property line on the property located at 14015 partridge Street NW, legally described as Lot 3, Block 4, Red Oaks Manor 4th Addition. Adopted by the City Council of the city of Andover this ____ day of , 1995. CITY OF ANDOVER J. E. McKelvey, Mayor ATTEST: V1ctoria Volk, City Clerk l. / N~ 3598 PERMIT # " 0 ;; . . CITY OF ANDOVER . Jurisdiction of . . . 0 ~ 1685 Crosstown Blvd. - Anoka, Minnesota 0 : ApI-. .ant to complete n/lmbered spaces only. "7;'; _ 1;1 nn . . ,JO. ..oa. liS ~ ":"til,'O<_ tV. l'-fo,1)" .5"\ ' Lv' _:11' ..0. ... ~ \,..c. ."" I 'Csce. "1'1'''(M[O s..elTI 10t,c-, 0"""'(_ L tx:l..,..J P:~'T .,. ".O"l 2 o <)"0 - 3'1q~ CO..UU,CTO. ....I.. 4DOltIESi- ~L'l-e ....0...1. I.ICENSE NO. 3 ..c..ITle'" o. :JlS,G..r.1II ""'.1'- "DoaI.SS ....0..1. ...1(1....'( ..0. 4 ....G:...Cl. ......... AC:"tss ....o..c ....(1....,1[ 1010. S ...[NOt" ....,.. "'DO"tSS .......c.. 6 .,lIt Oil' .UII.DI..G 7 8 Class 01 work: ONEW o ADDITION o ALTERATION o REPAIR o MOVE o REMOVE 9 Describe work: 5w' . I ~~'- - . "?.:::J I v' //.. I ""'..... ~ (J / 10 Change 01 use from //1//.>/ BL ~rA/c/!/J LJv;lZ/;V~ a/7.d - , Change of use to Occupancy fee I Su rtax I,~~ 11 ,Valuation of work: S .J ~OD.- PLAN CHECK FEE PERMIT FEE _ ~ 4"7 ..s SPECIAL CONDITIONS, Tyoe of OccuPAncy Const. Group Division Size of Bldg. No. of Mil., (TaUI) SQ. Ft. Stories Occ. LOAd . Fire U.. Fire Sprinklers ..P~l'C"TION "'CCE~TEO II" 'C'7.n~ ...qO~O. ~ O' Zone Zone ReQuired Dves DNa ;k ']...J14$3 7. ~ I. No_ of OFFSTREET PARKING jPACES' . --' I V Dwelling Units Covered Uncovered. NOTICE . Special Approvals Required Received Not Required SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMB- ZONING ING. HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. HEALTH DEPT. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC, TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR FIRE DEPT. IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED SOIL REPORT FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS OTHER (Specify) COMMENCED. I HERESY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. AI-I- PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TVPE OF WOAK WILL BE COMPI-IED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANV OTHER STATE OR I-OCAI- I-AW REGUL..ATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION, SI~N"''''\"IIIIC 0" CONTIt"C'fOlll 0111 "UT...glllIZCO ..c:.C""T tOATC) .f~ ';;/J ~~ 8 -I-g 3 s';.....'!'J.c :Iii" ~.......[III ,.iI" ow...[It ."...:.::[1111 0" 't[ I BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN CHECK VALIDATION WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED ON THIS SPACE) THIS IS YOUR PERMIT~ CK. M,O, CASH PERMIT VALIDATION if c:..- M.O, CASH TOTAL FEE COLLECTED s..3t.. 7S by d1- II <Is-I flJb .' " -rl.z.' r , -.. - ~.__._- - -<0 --I . ! . \ ._~~-_.- ----- , ._--~ \ " /. / N~ jS2S PERMIT 1/ .. . ~ . . . Jurisdiction of CITY OF ANDOVER . . . . ) 1685 Crosstown7~k~~i on Anoka. Minnesota . . Ap".,canr ro camp/ere nllmbered spaces only, . . ..01 .1.00. [.~s . /";O/S ~r 1-,. ; d <; C- $./-. NuJ ...~,. 0010. \'" \'"'' 'Cser. ATTAC"lO .am I '.ClTI 101.5c", :1""'''1.11 k(u:.~ ......1.. AOO"IS5 ". ...OHe 2 L,.,re^ CO..T....CTO. ......11" AOOIIC'S ... 0... c \'ICC"'SC NO. J _<...~.~ (J ".'MITce" 011 ~l',GJiIIl. ......11. ACO"CS' "...o..c ,"ler.NSI. NO. 4 c:..GHlllr.11l ......I~ "0;.['55 -..0,.1- ....Cr.....l NO. S ~1...0C. ......1. AOO"1.55 ...."'CM 6 ..Sl Oil' '",IIl.0''''," 7 8 Class of work: ONEW o ADDITION o ALTERATION o REPAIR o MOVE o REMOVE 9 Descnbe work: 'J ib-A-,'b ..;. ;-"".p (,~;,._. + I to Change of use from ~ I Change of use to II Valuation of work: S J 00. 0 0 Occupancy fee I Surtax ~-c PLAN CHECK FEE PERMIT FEE /O.C~ SPECIAL CONOITIONS, Type of Occupancy Const. Group DiVision Size of 81d9. No. of Mlx~ (TOUI) SQ. Ft. Stories Occ. LOld Fir. US, Fire 5Drinklers .......IC.. TIO" ..CCEPTED 8'1 ~I."'''IS CI-lECI(E 08'1 .PpqO\/'ED FO" ISSu"'''''CE !lY Zone Zone Required DVes DNa f tft~/~ No. of OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: Owellin9 Units Covered I Uncovered. NOTICE Special Approvals Required Received Not Required SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMB. ZONING ING. HEATING. VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING, HEALTH DEPT, THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL ANO VOIO IF WORK OR CONSTRUC- FIRE DEPT. TION AUTHORIZEO IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 OAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDEO OR ABANOONEO SOIL REPORT FOR A PERIOD OF 120 OAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED, OTHER (Soecify) I HEREBV CERTIFV THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIEO WITH WHETHER SPECIFIEO HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITV TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. SICO"ATy"C 0' CO"TlIIACTO. 0_ A",".OilllZID AGI.IroT ID.TEI f~ .....J) ~p . ~ 51 co.. A"'. ill !)II' ~W..l" 'III' :)W"l. .~I..::lt'" .::l,,"(l BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN CHECK VALIDATION WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACE I THIS IS YOUR PERMI CK. M.O, CASH PERMIT VALIDATION M,O. TOTAL FEE COLLECTED $ /C.SV I by l dJO =:;:::-- / W1 t 4.06 Permitted Encroachments The following shall not be considered as encroachments on setback and height requirements subject to other conditions hereinafter provided: (A) In any yards: posts, flues, belt course, leaders, sills, pilasters, lintels, cornices, eaves, gutters, awnings, open terraces, open canopies, steps, flag poles, chimneys, ornamental features, open fire escapes, sidewalks and window wells. (8PPP, 11-06-90) @ All projections shall not exceed thirty-six (36") inches as measured at ground level. (8PPP, 11-06-90) (B) In side and rear yards (not along a street): Detached outdoor picnic shelters or living rooms or patio decks may extend to within ten (10') feet of a side or rear lot line except that no such structures shall exceed five hundred (500 s.f.) square feet. (8PPP, 11-06-90) (C) On a corner lot: Nothing shall be placed or allowed to grow in such a manner as materially to obstruct vision between a height of two and one-half (2 1/2') feet and ten (10') feet above the centerline grades of the intersecting streets and within fifteen (15') feet of the street intersecting right-of-way lines. (8PPP, 11-06-90) (D) In no event shall off-street parking space, structures of any type, buildings or other features cover more than seventy-five (75%) percent of the lot area resulting in less than twenty-five (25%) percent landscaped area in Residential Districts. (E) In rear yards: Laundry drying equipment, outdoor eating facilities, picnic tables, and recreational equipment, provided these are not less than ten (10') feet from any lot line. (8PPP, 11-06-90) (F) Height limitations shall not apply to barns, silos and other structures on farms, to church spires, belfries, cupolas and domes, monuments, chimneys and smokestacks, flag poles, public and public utility facilities, transmission towers of commercial and private radio broadcasting station, television antennae, and parapet walls extending not more than four (4') feet above the limiting height of the building . except as hereinafter provided. (G) In any yards: Terraces, steps, exposed ramps (wheelchair), stoops, or similar features provided they do not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal structure or to a distance less than three (3') feet from any lot line nor less than one (1') foot from any existing or proposed access drive. Yard lights and name plate signs in Residential Districts, trees, shrubs, plants, floodlights, or other source of light illuminating authorized illuminated signs, or light standards for illuminating parking areas, loading areas or yards for safety and security reasons, provided the direct source of light is not visible from the public right-of-way or adjacent residential property. (8PPP, 11-06-90) Page 26 / 1;;;6 - 90 of. c.I.u CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA / Ordinance No. 8PPP / AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA. The City of Andover does ordain as follows: Section 4. General provisions: 4.06 Permitted Encroachments. The following shall not be considered as encroachments on setback and height requirements, subject to other conditions hereinafter provided: ~ v In. G' (A) In Any Yards: posts, flues, belt course, leaders, sills, pilasters, lintels, cornices, eaves, gutters, awnings, open terraces, open canopies, steps, flag poles, chimneys, ornamental features, open fire escapes, sidewalks, feaees, wa~~ e~ Aee~es ae~ eHeeeeiR~ SiH +6~+ fee~ iR Aei~A~ ~~eYieee ~Rey de Re~ e~ea~e a ~~affie Aa9a~e7 aRe see eRe s~e~y ~~ejee~ieRe e~ eYe-AaR~e e~ ~eef ~~ejee~ieRs Re~ iR eHee55 ef ~Ai~ty +~G~+ iReAes and window wells. All pro~ections shall not exceed thirty-six (36ft) inches as measure at ground level. (B) In Side and Rear Yards (not along a street): detached outdoor picnic shelters e~, living rooms or patio decks may extend to within fiye +5~+'ten (10') feet of a side or rear lot line, except that no such structures shall exceed five hundred (500 s.f.) square feet. (C) On a Corner Lot: Nothing shall be placed or allowed to grow in such a manner as materially to obstruct vision between the height of two and one-half (2 1/2') feet and ten (10') feet above the centerline grades of the intersecting streets and within fifteen (15') feet of the street intersecting right-of-way lines. (D) In no event shall off-street parking space, structures of any type, buildings or other features cover more than seventy-five (75%) percent of the lot area resulting in less than twenty-five (25%) percent landscaped area in Residential Districts. t' (E) In Rear Yards: Laundry drying equipment, outdoor eating facilities, picnic tables, eetaeaee e~tdee~ ~iyiR~ ~eeme, and recreational equipment, provided these are not less than iiye +5~+\ten (10') feet from any lot line. (F) Height limitations shall not apply to barns, silos and other structures on farms; to belfries, chimneys, church spires, cupolas, domes, flag poles, monuments, public facilities, public utility facilities, smokestacks, Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - August 8, 1995 Page 5 / (Public Hearing: Special Use Permit/Variance - Home Occupation in an Accessory Structure - 719 157th Avenue NW - Peter,.King, Continued) Commissioner Jovanovich asked when a service has outgrown the home business. Mr. Carlberg explained it would be when the conditions in the Resolution can no longer be met, such as the size res iiceions, the number of employees, traffic generated, etc. Mr. King ated he had no proQlem with the conditions listed. Commissioner A 1 suggested the hours of operation be extended somewhat to be able meet rush orders or deadlines without being in violation of the Spe al Use Permit. Mr. King then suggested the hours of operation be fro 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. on weekdays. The Commission stated they would not pport that, countering with 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., Monday through Friday. Mr. King agreed. MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Jovanovich, t Motion carried on a 6-Yes, 1-Absent (Put the public hearing. 8:10 p.m. Commissioner Peek and Commissioner Do ette felt it is a similar use to wood working, which has just bee the ordinance. Also, Commissioner Peek recalled in the p st that the interpretation has been that if the activity takes place utside of the required setbacks that a variance is not required. Co ~ssioner Apel agreed that the proposed use is in line with what has een allowed in the past. Also, he'd ) prefer it be without a varia ceo The Commission agreed to leave the decision for a variance req st with the applicant. Mr. King stated he would rather have a varian e granted. MOTION by Peek, Second d by Doucette, to forward the requ'est for a Special Use Permit for metal sawing business at 719 157th Avenue NW to the Andover City Co cil with the recommendation for approval. The Planning Commission inds it meets the criteria established in Ordinance No.8, Section 4. and Section 5.03, and that the use is permitted by Special Use unde Ordinance No.8, 7.03 in residential districts; and that the Speci Use Permit contain the 12 conditions outlined in the Staff report, ~n addition add Condition 13 which is hours of operation should be li ited to 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., Monday through Friday. A public hearing wa held and there was no negative comment. Motion carried on a 6-Yes, -Absent (Putnam) vote. MOTION y Peek, Seconded by Doucette, the Planning Commission recommends appr al of the variance request, a variance of 13 feet to the 50-foot rea yard setback. Motion carried on a 6-Yes, 1-Absent (Putnam) vote. T s will be placed on the September 5, 1995, City Council agenda. 8:13 .m. ~ VARIANCE - FENCE HEIGHT IN REAR YARD - 14015 PARTRIDGE STREET NW - LOREN KUCH .. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the variance request of Loren Kuch to~allow for the continued placement of a 9-foot fence exceeding the maximum height requirements at 14015 Partridge Street NW, Lot 3, Block 4, Red Oaks Manor 4th Addition. The ordinance requires that any fence in excess of Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - August 8, 1995 Page 6 / (Variance - Fence Height - 14015 Partridge Sstreet - Kuch, Continued) 6 feet in height should meet the building setback for the zoning district, which is a 10-foot setback in this case. The City became aware of the fence height violation through a complaint. The property owner is opting to request a variance to Section 4.21 instead of bringing the fence into code compliance. The Commission has a letter from Mr. Kuch stating the fence was constructed in 1983 with the approval of the building inspector. Mr. Carlberg stated he spoke with the Building Official, who did not recall approving the fence, nor is there any documentation in the files. Commissioner Peek asked if the deck around the pool is encroaching into the rear setback, as it appears to be on the sketch. Mr. Carlberg didn't know for sure; but if it is, a variance would be required for the deck as well. Loren Kuch. 14015 partridae Street NW - stated the fence is solid wood. The deck is 7 feet and was added at the same time the pool was installed. The building inspector inspected the pool, but not specifically the fence. Before putting up the fence, he talked with the building inspector to be sure it would be within the requirements. The building inspector indicated it was. Then the inspector came out a second time just to see how he was doing, and still everything was ) satisfactory. He called the inspector to ask about the 9-inch addition to the top of the fence and received a verbal okay over the phone, after which the inspector came out again to look at it. Dave Almgren was the inspector each time. He had no paperwork on the fence, but he did have some for the pool because a permit was required for that. He also explained that the state only requires a 4-foot fence around a pool, but that was not high enough to keep children out. Mr. Carlberg stated the ordinance regulatin the height of fences was adopted in 1979 and has not changed. ("'""~ was Ii i"9r a 00 ~g m~n~mu round poo,L_s...::;) Commissioner Apel felt one must be careful when talking about safety around a pool. This was installed to keep the children from climbing over, and a difficult situation could be created if forced~to cut it down to six feet and there were subsequent problems. It is a safety issue which apparently has worked for 12 years. It appears that this gentleman really tried to do the right thing and received the needed information, and he didn't care to deny the variance. Commissioner Peek saw a reasonable hardship if the building official stated the fence was okay. He did question the location of the deck, the type of deck and whether a variance is needed for it. Commissioner Jovanovich agreed that the fence has been there for 12 years enclosing the pool. She saw no reason to have it taken down or changed. Commissioner Doucette also agreed. She's read about several lawsuits with children trespassing and something happening even though there were fences around pools. She , \lQuldn' t want to be a part of that. Since the fence was. up for 12 j years, since the building inspector and zoning officer were the same person, because of the way the fence is constructed and because there has only been one complaint with no other neighbors considering this an issue, she favored the variance. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - August 8, 1995 'Page 7 I ... (Variance - Fence Height - 14015 Partridge Sstreet - Kuch, Continued) " Mr. Carlberg explained the complaint was on the fact that bees build hives in the fence, plus the massive size. Chairperson Squires didn't think a 6-foot versus a 9-foot fence would make a difference with regard to bees. Mr. Kuch - stated he is normally out of town during the week and at the residence only on weekends. If a child climbs over the fence during the week, there would be no one to stop them or find them if there was an accident. Commissioner Apel again stated that the fence stood for 12 years without complaint until someone moves in and takes a different view of things. The City has granted many variances on things that were done contrary to ordinance requirements. He didn't recall the City ever asking anyone to tear down anything. Also, he didn't agree with a 4- foot fence around a pool. Chairperson Squires felt that just because it was built 12 years ago, in his mind, did not justify a variance. Health and safety would be something to focus on. He wondered if there is going to be another variance coming for the deck. Mr. Carlberg stated Staff would have to do more research. ' ... In a straw vote, the Commission was in favor of approving the variance for the fence; but they suggested the applicant may wish to table this I variance until it is known whether or not another one is needed for the deck. If it is needed, doing both of the variances at one time would save the applicant time and fees. After some discussion, the applicant asked that this item be tabled to the next meeting to allow the Staff to look at the deck issue. The Commission agreed. The item was tabled to the August 22, 1995, meeting. DISCUSSION CONTINUED - ORDINANCE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SEED/SOD REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Mr. Carlberg explained the proposed ordinance includes the changes requested by the Commission to include a definition of topsoil, add a provision for wetlands, and add a retroactive clause in Section 5. One issue still remaining is whether the time period for turf establishment should be one or two years after the Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. In further discussion, Mr. Carlberg explained the intent is to prevent open bare spots after construction of a house. This does not prevent general landscaping but is trying to get yards established. It relates to urban lot development only. .. There was a difference of opinion as to the length of time needed to establish the turf. Commissioners Jovanovich and Doucette supported two years because it is expensive to add topsoil and sod or seed. Commissioner Luedtke supported one year. He felt a lot of damage could be done to neighboring yards within two years and that the cost of the yard work will just be included in the builder's package. Mr. Carlberg explained the problem the City has wlth dirt getting into the storm sewer system when turf is not established. That was addressed when Ordinance 10 was changed to require turf establishment in the boulevards CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION August a, 1995 DATE AGENDA ITEM 5. Variance - Fence Height 14015 Partridge Street NW Loren Kuch ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning, David L. Carlberg Planning Director APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: BY~ REQUEST The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the variance request of Loren Kuch to allow for the continued placement of a nine (9') foot fence exceeding the maximum height ' requirements located on property line pursuant to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.21 on the property located at 14015 Partridge Street NW, legally described as Lot 3, Block 4, Red Oaks Manor 4th Addition. The property is zoned R-4, Single Family Urban. APPLICABLE ORDINANCES . nrdinance No. a, Section 4.21, Fences and walls, states }at, "Any fence, hedge or wall in excess of six (6') feet in neight shall meet the minimum required building setback for the Zoning District in which it is located". In this case the setback would be ten (10') feet. Ordinance No. a, Section 5.04, establishes the variance procedure and process. Variances may be granted where there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in any way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. The hardships or difficulties must have to do with the characteristics of the land and not the property owner. BACKGROUND ~ REVIEW The City became aware of the fence height violation by a complaint received. The property owner is opting to request a variance to Section 4.21 instead of bringing the fence into code compliance. Attached is a letter from the applicant with his request. Page Two "uiance - Fence Height .015 partridge street NW Loren Kuch August 8, 1995 COMMISSION OPTIONS A. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend approval of the variance requested by Loren Kuch to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.21 to allow for the continued placement ofa~x~ fence located on the property line exceeding the maximum'~~;:' "~',:(i;')]':, ) height requirement on the property located at 14015 pattridge};';;,);:~;1iiVc~'~~ Street NW, Legally described as Lot 3, Block 4, Red Oaks Manor~/;:>(' ::.' 4th Addition. --r ,-', '.. ~:. I . -.. ~~;~.. , ; ~! .;~'y~~.~ =..", The Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the conditions established in Ordinance No.8, section 5.04. '. :.-...: .~~ . . .... -"-'.-. ',-1 ". ,~:. B. . The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend .1,.,. denial of the variance requested by Loren Kuch to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.21 to allow for the continued placement of a fence located on the property line exceeding the maximum height requirement on the property located at 14015 partridge Street NW, Legally described as Lot 3, Block 4, Red Oaks Manor 4th Addition. " ( / The Commission finds that the proposal does not meet the requirements set forth in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04. The Commission finds that no hardship exists due to the unique shape or topography of the parcel and that the land owner would not be precluded reasonable use of the property. C. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may table the item. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends Option B. @ " .~"7J" --lj'1Ji -- 00. .'0 .;<J I .:C ,,\ ,-- ,'i) " 15.' (1/ (z) I" ,"' I .3 .. Z .... ~ ~ -:::... ~ ~ .... ".. 114.' "" N 1/4 CORNER SEC.34 " ~~ -- .- &.I~ ..'~ "" ~'.f I_I' ~ \" fI J '" " " """ I .le -- , " . .' , .' I) ~ ~ '" ~ z z ::> ~ 0 ~ , ':ll '.. .~ 4.~'.f~f. .. (~4) !: ~ ; I' (~I/ ;: ~ 5:, '" ~ z ~) ~ 1 ~ I .-; I'~ (I) (~) ''''It ", .. :~ 8 ~ ~;. " ';'~ W I ....J <t ~ C) Z /~# I- (~7) J: , 10 :t C) I~ Z (~I,) !t If ,. ~ 1M fJ l .. 't7fi&4. 1'0 ., :t II ..t'1"" _ ~ '< r. JI ,., .., ~ (;'j) ~ I .,.., ",iJ'..'~ 1 (.1~) :i - -. I - ;i,}" ~;:~'~~ "I~'SJ .:~ ::> ; .& i':'- ,1 .. "' I ~ I .:C: U j I ~ '" /4. ~ !,: .:y .V !1/J/ 11 ~I~ 18! :: (Jr.) ;" .... 4 - ... ~ , "'':<;' ... I '=: (nJ 4 .'!~ 'k~ :5; '" ... "'... " 7~') " r ,it ~.J" ;'z.,) , .-' ., .'~ . ., ,~ (J4) .. :> 1 . .~ < .. . .. ;.: ..../ .'~.I l,}l,/ r '" :; .; ~ ~ ::l'~ N :".J,;..'(~ (4: .. il .,! :'1 :, ,- \ .f,! ~ .':... 138TH AVE. NW ," PAR rR/Dc~ Sr ( Hou s<:, GA.(~G'E ~I ~~2"~~ POR.C,J( POOL.. /6 )(3<. ~ 'v 'V \0.... ~lo(' \Co ~.., ~ N J / ::s II _ l' 6.4f. J 0 I SET8I1CJ<. - ~ '..,J " f~7')c.E ( s; [ u--'----l ( ~ ~ -z- - -J fA ..~: .L } , ; . . CITY of ANDOVER VARIANCE REQUEST FORM Property Address l'-1ed 5" PA R1..Rl0GE S, Nw Legal Description of Property: (Fill in whichever is appropriate): . Lot 3 Block Lf R () M Tf1 Addi tion ED A~ I IItN6R..) Y - ADf)/T; Plat Parcel PIN (If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Description of Request ALLOW S. X JSTIN6 r:E;NC'~ TO RD1AIN. S.l;t= 4TTAoJ~ Sf/EST Specific Hardship ~E€ A7TACHE/) SHE!; 7 Section of Ordinance Lf,21 Current zoning I<. - ';b t< ESI D~N I-'fL ----------------------------------------------------------------- Name of Applicant L 0 /{E N J< uCH Address ILJ{))5 PAltrRJ{')(:,F ST N(,j Home Phone 757- 34'75"' Business Phone Signature ';:;/J~ ';/! o;(J Date (bOg.) 5/"5- 7200 7 - 23-9S ----------------------------------------------------------------- Property Owner (Fee Owner) (If different from above) Address Home Phone Business Phone Signature Date ----------------------------------------------------------------- VARIANCE PAGE 2 / The following information shall be submitted prior to review by the City of Andover: l. A scaled drawing of the property and structures affected showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures within 100 feet. 2. Application Fee: Single Family Other Requests - $ 75.00 $100.00 Date Paid -?/n-;4S- Receipt I 02.4- 70..;1.... Rev. l-07-92:d'A S-23-94:bh Res. 179-91 (1l-0S-9l) CRITERIA FOR GRANTING A VARIANCE In granting a variance, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendation of the Planning and zoning Commission, and: ! '. 1. If the request is in keeping with the spirit and intent of this Ordinance. 2. If it finds that strict enforcement of this Ordinance will cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. 3. If it finds that denying the request does not deny reasonable use of the property. 4. Economic considerations shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of the Ordinance. The fence was put up in 1983 to encLose the back yard. A pooL was also installed at that time and the state required a fence. I checked with the city inspector at that time to be sure everything was ok. He came out and inspected the construction when it was nearly completed. The original fence was 8 ft. high. After the pool opened, I had a problem with neighborhood kids climbing the fence and using the pool while I was at work. I added a 9 in. cap to the top of the fence. The cap has a top which is hard to grab and with its added height put a stop to the trespassing. Again, I talked to the building inspector and got his ok before adding to the fence. He came out and looked at it as we were installing it. The neighbors on both sides of me have attached their fences to my fence so they wouldn't have to put up their own fence over that distance. The neighbors on lot 4 want the fence to stay as is(I haven't spoken to the others). If the neighbor behind me is the complainer, I suspect he wants the fence lower so his kid will be able to trespass on my property to retrieve balls, etc. i ~ As shown on the drawings, if the fence were 10 feet from the property line, I would have almost no back yard left. The previous owners had the SE corner of the property moved in by 10 feet. The city failed to notify the county of this change, so the county maps showed the back yard as 10 feet bigger at the time I purchased it. If moved, the fence would be on top of the pool deck. In addition, the fence would be very difficult to move - it's supported with 4x4's and is covered with overlapping cedar boards on both sides. To lower it would take a chainsaw and would be quite an eyesore when done. Eliminating it is not a possibility as long as the pool is inside. The fence has been there for 12 years. If the city didn't allow it, they shouldn't have approved of it at that time. Almost every house on Partridge St. has been sold since the fence went up, so people knew the fence was there when they moved in. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 19, 1995 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED t>O. FOR AGENDA ni.,,..,,.,.,i,.." ITEM ~ t>O. Planning BY:, J) fJJ Metropolitan Livable Communities Act David L. Carlberg 51 Planning Director The City Council is asked to discuss the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. The City must participate in the Metropolitan Council's Housing Incentives program to be eligible to apply for grants as a part of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund administered by Met. Council. The MLC Fund consists of three accounts: the Tax base Revitalization Account, which provides grants for polluted site cleanup; the Livable Communities Demonstration Account, designed to fund community development projects; and the Local Housing Incentives Account, which provides grants to assist cities in achieving affordable and life cycle housing goals through a voluntary program. Attached is documentation provided by Met. Council giving a background on the Livable Communities Act, Housing Incentives Program and the Livable Communities Fund. Staff met with Mark Filipi and Tom Caswell, Met Council on Thursday, September 14, 1995 to discuss the Livable Communities Act and Andover's participation in the Metropolitan Council's Housing Incentives Program. Staff was updated on the Act and it's provisions and was also informed that an annual report on the program will be submitted to the State Legislature. The report will indicate which communities are participating in the program and the progress to date as well as which communities are not participating. Those communities who do not choose to participate, in addition to being ineligible for funding, may also suffer negative reviews in regional investment decisions by Met. Council. The Council should also be aware that funding is available through the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development for the Contamination Cleanup Grant Program. However, the city of Andover must participate in the Metropolitan Council's Housing Incentives Program to be eligible. Attached is documentation on the DTED program. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: i' F MINNESOTA DEPAKIMENT OF mADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SOO Metro Sq~ ' 111 7th Place East St. Paul, MN 55101 Cootllct: Meredith Udoibok, 611/297-4132 " CONTAMINATION CLEANUP GRANT APPliCATION The Contamination Cleanup Grant Program runs on a semiannual cycle. Deadlines for application are either November 15 or May 15 of each year. Applications must be received by the Department of Trade and Economic Development (DTED) by 4 p.m. on either date or must be postmarked by the application deadline date. You must submit the original application along with 2 copies. NOTE: An applicant can apply for more than one site. However, an application must be completed for each site individually. Please fill out the entire application. All applications must be complete upon submission in order to qualify for a grant PURPOSElBACKGROUND: The Contamination Cleanup Grant Program was established by the 1993 legislature to provide funds to clean up contaminated sites and provide a greater opportunity to convert contaminated property into a marketable asset The main objective of this program is to serve the best interests and needs of communities by removing pollutants from sites within those communities in order to provide developable land and reduce the potential threat to public health and the environment This grant program will provide a suitable means for parties to clean up and develop contaminated sites and allow for redevelopment The total legislative appropriation for this grant program is $7.8 million of general fund monies for fiscal years 1996 and 1997. With semiannual grant cycles, this allows $1,950,000 to be available per cycle for the biennium. Proceeds from the contamination tax are also applied to this program. Therefore, funding for grant cycles could increase depending on when DTED receives the contamination taxes from the Department of Revenue and depending on the amount collected. The legislature has designated that 25% of available funds be spent on sites in Greater Minnesota unless sufficient applications are not received. This allows the grant program to assist with cleanup efforts statewide. I EUGmLE APPliCANTS: Eligible applicants for this program are statutory or home rule chaner cities, economic development authorities, housing and redevelopment authorities, or port authorities. ~ QUALIFYING SII'FS: A site must meet each of the following criteria in order to qualify for the Contamination Cleanup 0ant Program: 1) A grant cannot be given to a municipality in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area unless it is participating in the Metropolitan Council's Local Housing Incentives Program. For information on how to participate in this program, call Hal Freshly at the Metropolitan Council at 612/291-6467. 2) A site qualifies for this grant program if it is nQ1 scheduled for funding under the Federal Superfund Program (United States Code, tide 42, section 9601 et seq.) or the Environmental Response and Liability Act (MN Statutes 115B.Ol to 115B.24). To check if your site is on either of these lists and is receiving funding. contact Ron Swenson at 612/297- 1793 or Rich Sandberg at 612/296-7201 with the Preliminary A"~entlSite Investigation Unit at the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). 3) If the site contains contaminants. pollutants or hazardous substances as referenced in Minnesota Statutes 115B.02, it qualifies for this program. Minnesota Statutes 115B.02 excludes petroleum as a qualifying substance and therefore petroleum sites are not eligible for this grant program. Asbestos is also excluded. However, most other contaminants, pollutants or hazardous substances will qualify. If you have any questions about specific substances and their eligibility you are encouraged to call the Site Response Section at the MPCA at 612/296-7758 or Pat Matuseslci at 612/297-8337. 4) A site qualifies for this grant program if the appraised' value of the site with contaminants (pre-cleanup) is less than 50% of the estimated cleanup costs (the cost of implementing a response action plan) or is less than or equal to the estimated cleanup c:osts for the site and the cleanup costs equal or exceed $3 per square foot. Accepted appraisal methodology and independent appraisers must be used in appraising the site. 5) Finally, a site will qualify for this grant program if it is expected that the site will be improved with buildings or other improvements and that these buildings or improvements will provide a substantial increase in the property tax base or will be used for an important publicly owned or tax exempt facility. The above criteria are aligned with the major goals of this program; public benefits, redevelopment and economic development. In order to disburse monies to a wider range of contaminatecisites, we will not fund sites already receiving federal or state funding under the Superfund program nor will we duplicate efforts by funding sites already receiving funding under any other state program (i.e. Department of Agriculture's ACRRA program. other MPCA programs including Petro fund, etc.). II j r REQUIRED BUDGET/SQlEDULE: It is required that you submit a detailed line item budget outlining the cleanup cost as well as the total project cost for the site as outlined below. The line item budget must outline the cleanup cost. which means, by definition for this program, "the costs of developing and implementing a respon~e action plan, but does not include implementation costs incurred before the award of a grant unless the application for the grant was submitted within 180 days after the response action plan was approved by the commissioner of the pollution control agency." This means site assessment/testing and cleanup are eligible for grant funds. It also means that you can begin to implement your approved response action plan (or cleanup the site) before you are awarded a grant if you applied for the grant within 180 days of the MPCA approving your response action plan and have those implementation costs eligible for reimbursement if you receive a grant This is done, of course, at the discretion and risk of the applicant Implementation of the RAP prior to a grant award doesn't obligate DTED to reimburse the costs incurred nor provide funding to complete the RAP if a grant is not awarded. All approved response actions md site assessment costs should be itemized with a comspondinl expense. The line item budget must also include the project cost. defined in this program as, "the cleanup costs for the site (see above definition), and the cost of related site acquisition, demolition of existing improvements, and installation of public improvements necessary for the applicant to implement the response action plan." These costs must also be itemized with a comspondinl expense. NOTE: Project administration is not a grant eligible expense. You must also submit a detailed project schedule outlining the individual tasks and schedules of the overall project (this will include the cleanup of the site as well as the timeline for development after cleanup). Please keep in mind, however, that the grant can only be used for the cleanup of the site. This will include, but is not limited to, schedules on site assessment/testing, cleanup, demolition, construction, or any other project activities. A project schedule fonn is provided on page 9. LOCAL MA TOI REQUIREMENT: It is required that the municipality in which the site is located pay for one-half of the project cost as a local match to obtain a state grant The municipality shall pay an amount equal to 12 percent of the cleanup costs from the municipality's general fund, a property tax levy or other unrestricted money available to the municipality. Tax increments may n2S be used for this purpose. Unrestricted money may be spent for project costs, other than cleanup costs and still qualify for the local match payment equal to 12 percent of the cleanup costs. The rest of the local match may be paid with tax increments, regional, state or federal money available for the redevelopment of brownfields (including money from the Metropolitan Council's Tax Base Revitalization Account for metro applicants) or any other money available to the municipality. If the applicant establishes a TIF district or hazardous substance subdistrict on the site to pay for part of the local match requirement, the district or subdistrict ill / is not subject to the state aid reductions under MS 273.1399. In order to qualify for the exemption from the state aid reductions, the municipality must elect. by resolution, on or before the request for certification is filed. that all tax increments for the district or subdistrict will be used exclusively to pay (1) project costs for the site and (2) administrative costs for the district or subdistrict The district or subdistrict must be decertified when an amount of tax increments equal to no more than three times the costs of implementing the response action plan for the site and the administrative costs for the district or subdistrict have been received. after deducting the amount of the state grant LOCAL MATCH EXAMPLE: Expenses: Cleanup Cost Total Project Cost Demolition Cleanup Cost (see above) $100,000 $ 50,000 S100.000 S150,OOO Funding Formula: 1/2 of Total Project Cost = S75,OOO (this is your local match) 12% of Cleanup Cost = S12,OOO (must come from property tax levy, etc. as described above) S75,OOO - $12,000 = $63,000 (must come from TIF, etc. as described above) / Please note that the grant can pay for up to 75% of the cleanup cost, not to exceed 50% of the project cost. Therefore, while the statute requires the applicant to demonstrate a local match of 50% of the project cost, the municipality !!lAX end up paying more, depending on how their cleanup and project costs fit into this formula. In other words. if the applicant receives a grant. the amount of the grant will either be 75% of the cleanup costs or 50% of the project costs, whichever is less. Thus, the municipality either pays 25% of the cleanup costs or 50% of the project cost, whichever is more. APPRAISALS: An appraisal of the current market value of the property (with contaminants) and an appraisal of the site after cleanup are required. Both values may be included in a single appraisal. The required appraisal must be prepared by a qualified independent appraiser using accepted appraisal methodology. No other appraisals will be accepted. A WARDING GRANIS: Due to environmental contamination that has affected many communities throughout Minnesota. a large number of applicants are expected to apply for the contamination cleanup grants. The law allows the Department of Trade and Economic Development.to malee grants for sites that provide the highest return in public benefits for the public costs incurred and that meet all the statutory requirements. In order to evaluate the applications for public benefits with respect to the costs incurred. the law specifies priorities which DTED must consider. To fulfill this requirement of reviewing applications in an IV ~ objective and fair manner, the following required criteria have been assigned maximum point values in order to systematically award grants. All assigned scores will be relative to scores awarded to other applications. 1. The potential increase in the property tax base of the local taxing jurisdictions relative to the fiscal needs of the jurisdictions, that will result from developments that will occur because of completion of each of the approved response actions. Maximum = 30 points. 2. The social value to the community that will result from cleaning up and redeveloping the site. In order to evaluate social value, the application requires that you indicate the estimated number of jobs that will be created through developing the site after cleanup, the value of the public and private investment, removal of blighting influences and the reduction or elimination of health threats. Maximum = 30 points. 3. All applications will be forwarded to the MPCA. MPCA staff will review and rank each application according to the potential threat to human health and the environment that would be reduced or eliminated by completion of each of the response action plans. Maximum =0 30 points. 4. The likelihood that each site will be cleaned up without use of government money in the reasonably foreseeable future. Maximum = 10 points. s. The amount of cleanup costs for each site in inverse relationship to the public benefits derived from the cleanup. Maximum = 20 points. 6. The amount and level of the commitment of municipal or other local resources to pay for the cleanup costs. Maximum = 10 points. IMPORTANT: Some of the information required on the following pages may be included in your MPCA approved Response Action Plan (RAP) or, if you are applying for Metropolitan Council money, the Metropolitan Council's Tax Base Revitalization Program. Rather than duplicate this information on DTED forms, you may simply attach excerpts from your approved RAP or Tax Base Revitalization application. Be sure to highlight the applicable information and indicate on this application which information you are submitting excerpts for. For your convenience, an application checklist has been included on page 14. .(. v CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION September 19, 1995 DATE AGENDA 1\0. Discussion Item Todd J. Haas, Engineering ~ d( APPROVED FOR AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM 1\0. Approve Removal of Illegal Stop Signs/Green Acres & Northwoods BY: ~ Co. The City Council is requested to order the removal of illegal stop signs at the following intersections as requested by the Road Committee: 1. Flora Street NW at 141st Avenue NW 2. Crocus Street NW at 139th Lane NW I The stop signs at these locations do not meet the Warrants for Installation of Stop Signs as identified in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Devices (see attached). Although stop signs are often installed to reduce speed, studies have shown that a reduction in speed is usually insignificant. Also, improperly installed signs may have legal implications for the City. We did send out letters to the property owners within 350 feet of each intersection of the possible removal of the stop signs (see attached). I MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ":ri~ I __ I. ! ~ I ! 1:1 bA II: .II,:'J.'~~~~\~;. :H4~U"r~!_ ~~ti,3:" ;0:' ~ ! i _, J .. \-.i ",Il!'h,~~ : '\\'" ' , '(";;~&~.... ~ ;:..,"'~ I \ //li'~~'~ ~"("' \ " I \ 1.1 ~~~ ...:-: [C ~~ :;. 'lri~~.::. " -, I ~ ,... IIIN!III/!iBlmllllif!I:litn ,.... ~,~.C:5 ~ v~,. rflT ~ ~ \\I':~.-1. ~r.rl:iIllllrll1l!l-' ~ :t~. ~~. ':' III 7 f- -j ~ ,""" ~'-'JI~!!lilf LffiLH ~~_.~ ~ ..T:rr; · I ""'0 ':;. ~~ :;. ' 17 = Te:". <'< ~~ ~ \<,;",... ,.. ,_.' 'fJI n I ~ "9,(' ",' _ lii"ll .I~ >;,j!: ""I'~JT" ~s..; "+ Z... ~ ~.ll: LOG&.I-Ic. ~ . ...~;?::<...,,\ ,1m i'il ~--'_oo G'a. "''.,tJ'; ~t!. '",;"A. \ 11"':1\.1 _ U! --. w;.- ~","v !;~. It'~ a' gIHI!I!~""~.y~. ;\'iii' " lill@ ~ " - ~ 9<.. > !!. _W>r" ! ,I~I~!". 1;;-' rr.g, ~'.!!!!II:1 [~~~'O'lilllill~~ i.,.,. ,'I!" '~Jrlll.~1~1U!aI~~' ~ s ~! fi~ ~ :FiP,'.,' I~rml I ;liD'l... ~",<..., ...... _HI~flnj;iiWl'I:,S ! r ,!!! ~ . .,1- .It 1- -If! ~ ~:;,,".. '~;"'" ~ 1 ";!i~"'", e ~ v I... it ;;;1. '!;i;;..!:!!! '~ !~~:i , --~:. I I_:I~ .~ 1,....'~'Z)..y-~~:;... - ~'" ;M'" '~'I....- ~r,-E!t;~~~i. -:a -t "', II llliJ ~Illi TJ):i/.I'/;, ~ -, ~ ~I'.. ,'" --. ~ ~ "... 'JY', o' l\ /Om 0' '"_ ~.rt'l,l . """ ~IIJ ' -', Si '" _ . _. . :. _ _ , .. =- ;;: -, ill JjJ I mi~, 1- - ~ '!I:~ ~I /..- ~JtOOI(...n "'~ 'l1~::; ~ V;f:.. - - -,': - - ~~-.;. - > _:. I 'i..... - ~ m "'I ;-= ~~ I==~'i!"" '&- "1' - ",_ .~ It . -~~~ 'JI'1l'II.Y1J1i1~: ~ /::;~"~' ~.-\~~0"'..~~ 'm~ii : 1r' ~:>: ~~ . ' --:=l """~ i~ 0;.,..>" r f:iIJ ~I ~i iii - - 1-::..1'- _. 1.- -~'.Il . fl~, ~ ~~ ~I Iff.,11 ~, ,~" "",' g 1-1~ljiSi ~"". -- '--'-'i!I~~lli~ll!I~!I~'H!n~ ~ "" '7":":' -====- ....,., It I.A'" L\1D ~ ,..,-;1 .I'j~ h It'-o.i '::' '-'L~. J.'~ ! ~ ~ ,. ~' r ~ ~ , I I ~~: ij !I~I~I!~) 1~IUVL~ iij m !I;I ~ I\JS~ ....r.. ~~~ ;: ; P-"~" "I ;;; ~ ~ L' , " . ",;j~~ ')!:.c.t;~ ~ ~ '\ ,_ ,...., ,.... ~ ~ - S~~' It I,. "". -:..!..."";' A..,,"'. ~~W 1= ""'~')~ ~,;;;:p>.; '.J :::;,,".,. I ' " "'"",,~~, ....- , 11_ -, ~ - ~ . .- ,_ _ , ....,'7..... I '... '--,- il.ilt ',. ~!iil! I~ ~ ;'UK::;;;;o; ,_ "':' "'~',,' ~ ,.._ , .. '1-'- r-::.- IDn .. ~ !:!~ = \( "of' ~- 11,:1, . '.... I ~1 ~~~:. ,- r. '. ~L~ ~ ,r~;l :'':: ~ ~ ~ ~ '~'~'~i;.~: . ~~:":i~:';" i '/:~~. '. . .~, _ I ,. , , " '7." ':',1 l'''''::1.:; - """" ~...... I!I~I, ili .' F;;;;:\"(. ., i"'~ i~ ~"~~:'!i:I:':E'fL!" ~ ,FAA ! =-r ~ .- ,.' ~.. '''-J.i' "1iI11: . S" ri~ ,=.,..r (7' "!,"" .;.:; .' c' ~li:!1 ""lJt4i'!f::;~ .,- r "! 1oW.!!", ::..~ ,:~,:t~ r~ ~"f,;;;""'=",,:l':'fIiililil:':~"'''''''',: ~ij;: ~~~:;I ",~ 1'1'.. > . ".~. I~~I:I~:~: ,if;;; ....'~ ",,- ro............!.L.,- "",("".,1 '""""'- ~~.~' ,.,.!.;~"."""",,,s;=\~{~ ~,_ir__....l i..., "" "::. - ,,,j'';'''''''I''-=. ~.~ '" .~tl:~ ;,. {':/i::. ": . <:>"v_,'O.2!:A'-'~" = _ -i"-Ji,,,,,,I~I,,:",.,.. Iffill7'~ """"'~-; ~.I< . "<';$!!i1.1~"" Crooked \- -- e:i'!'! " ...... ..-:.lll~i~!!I!li!~~ h '. . :;'.. m: ~..'t ~~Il7:1!~, .,.~'':;~ '''''-..11' Lake ~ilc~ m,o- --b0"IWlil!IEill~ <_ -~Iml!'\! ,~, .~~~ '" ....-.~.: ~"""'" ..,./ , --n;!o , · - ,~,.._-~ (' 1_", .. , , -1... --. '. - - - If.: ". ~r I ~ R I - -. : i , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ in ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ in ~ in ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ in ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 > :; .. z z ~ z ~ l; ~ > 0 .. ~ z 0 ~ ~ " ~ z " ~ ~ ~ z ~ x ~ ~ ~ c > c " 0 ~ !l ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ c 5 ~ 0 ~ :; ::! " ;; > x ~ > ~ 0 0 e~____.... -'- ~ ~~- ~ -. - ~,:.::.-._' -:::- -- =-=:-= :::.-:.':':.._~'~:::=~' ""~ CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W, . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 September 12, 1995 Owner/Occupant Re: Consideration of Removal of Existing Stop Signs Dear Owner/Occupant: The City Council will be considering the removal of stop signs at the intersection of Flora Street NW and 141st Avenue NW at their September 19, 1995 meeting starting at 7:00 PM at the Andover City Hall. unfortunately, the existing stop signs do not meet warrants as identified in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. j If you would like to make any input to the stop signs that are being considered to be removed, please attend the meeting. Otherwise, feel free to contact me at 755-5100. Sincerely, ~/~ Todd J. Haas, E.I.T. Assistant City Engineer TJH:rja r , ~:~ ,.",~~~~~:~z;,';~~ '.r:':"'~"r~ ~'_, ",,',,1~' .~_' ," _~."L~ '_'_.,."'''_~" "'~, ... _~ 't ~, ,;.., '.~.. .'.... -.I' ~ _........ " ...... ~ CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 · (612) 755-5100 September 12, 1995 Owner/Occupant Re: Consideration of Removal of Existing Stop Signs Dear Owner/Occupant: The City Council will be considering the removal of stop signs at the intersection of Crocus Street NW and 139th Lane NW at their september 19, 1995 meeting starting at 7:00 PM at the Andover City Hall. Unfortunately, the existing stop signs do not meet warrants as identified in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. If you would like to make any input to the stop signs that are being considered to be removed, please attend the meeting. Otherwise, feel free to contact me at 755-5100. Sincerely, ~~~ Todd J. Haas, E.I.T. Assistant City Engineer TJH:rja , , ;1 ~ ~'-""'~;.""" ~'...~. . ~, '\'\\..'. '\?: ALL-WAY STOPS The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and Traffic Engineers Handbook (fEH) have established specific warrants for installation of 4 way or all way stops. These warrants were developed to assist in determining whether or not 4 way stop signs could help assign right of way at higher volume intersections reduce an acci- dent problem, or fill in as an interim measure until traffic signals could be installed. Con- siderations outside established warrants are restricted intersection sight distances, and school crossings. Studies have shown that 4 way stop signs are not an effective technique for controlling speeds and should not be used to reduce traffic volumes, or simply to satisfy citizen demands. It should be remem- bered that stop signs constitute one of the most significant means of separating and controlling traffic movements and should be carefully considered. Effects Volumes. Four-way stop signs produce no net reduction of traffic volumes if traffic is primarily local in make-up. Where there is existing shortcutting thru traffic, stop signs may reduce volumes; however, the effective- ness of the 4-way stop as a deterrent to thru traffic is dependent on stop sign saturation, heavy enforcement and the availability of useful alternative routes. Often the alterna- tive route is another adjacent residential street, and problem traffic is merely dis- placed, not eliminated. Neighborhood Traffic Control January 1994 15-1 a_ CHAPTER, 15 Speeds. Studies have typically shown 4-way stops do not have a significant impact on vehicular speeds. Overall area speeds have shown minimal reductions near the intersec- tion. In midblock areas, where most acci- dents involving young pedestrians occur, speed increases are frequently the result. Safety. It is not clear whether 4-way stop signs will improve safety when they do not meet established warrants. In some cases accidents actually increase, possibly due to the stop signs being unexpected or deemed unnecessary thereby encouraging rolling stops, or by instilling a false sense of security in crossing motorists and pedestrians. Studies have shown that stop signs that do not meet warrants are basically ignored by many drivers. Also as mentioned before, speeds tend to increase in the mid block areas where most young pedestrian accidents occur. However, if warrants are met or where sight distances are poor - an all way stop may increase safety. / 1"raffic Noise, Air Quality; Energy Consump- tion. Noise is increased near the intersectio"n due to the increased activity of acceleration (many drivers speed up to make up for time lost at the stop sign) and added braking. Ad- jacent residents may complain about the addi- tional noise. Air quality is worsened and fuel consumption is increased due to added deceleration, ac- ,; celeration and idling. Unnecessary stops reduce the efficient movement of traffic flow, by increasing travel time on the route. Community Reaction.. Mixed. Some resi- dents would feel "anything is better than noth- ing" or are misinformed about the potential impacts. Some view this measure as a safety improvement. Others view this measure as an unnecessary impediment to reasonable move- ment thru the area and an encouragement to ''blow the stop signs" in the area. Many resi~ dents in the immediate vicinity of all~way stop signs view them in a positive manner. It is up to traffic engineers or other governing agents to responsibly determine the best traffic con- trol under the specific circumstances based on reasonable guidelines. Additional Considerations Installation of all-way stop signs is often used by a governing body as an immediate, tan- gible and inexpensive response to a neighborhood's concern about safety on a local residential street. The use of stop signs creates a solution which is one of perception rather than effective improvement. This misuse of stop signs should be resisted by the local traffic engineer and governing body. Some studies have shown that the warrants for stop signs can be expanded to include other considerations such as presence of Neighborhood Traffic Control January 1994 15-2 designated school crossings and sight dis- tance problems. The failure to follow the es- tablished warrants, to install stop signs without specific justification, may have legal implications to the local government agency. ............ ..... ......... ":.:.:.:.::::'" .................... ......... ....:::::::.... ............ :;,.. h::::::.:. ..-.......:........-.:............-...........-................................................. ......................... ...'~%'~W%li~~t~~1~~9W~Wti#;ttt. .'..,.,'., .<:r:::::.:',.. ................-......................................................................-.................. -~~................ ............................-..........--.-..........................................................,... .... -.......... ......--.................................... ..................................................... .. ............... ............-....... ..................... '~)...,..~Ufuj:r;1fg~Y*~1Jfu~~~.{..::.{....}.{: ....:.{.:}} .. ........-.......... ...-.... .......... ...........:::-.....................h.....::::::::. :::::::::::::::::::::: ........:::::::::::::::::::::....:::::::.. '.'::::::::::::::::::.'::::.'::::.':.':.':.':::":...:......::::..::..:..:::::..:::::::: , .:'"...:.ftt,:l#:i.met:8~NZ:i.t:f.%1i##t.ii.#i#:2&~WglliYfM .-::~~$i?rtfffi.fu:&t~~kffefh~#.fu.VM5f-~ti.~~.~H~~... tt!l,ttIlli!i[IIII..'flllli(@lil ........................,................ ........... ...n...... ........ ......:...iiib)'t:he~~ntb.ihe~"y~i\i~m$!an.d..p.e.d~t#.##::...:tt::: ........ .._-....... ......-._.-.......... .... ............ ...... .............. .... ,........ .- - ......................................... ..................................-....-.-....-...-................................-......-.......................................n. %t;t;,i~t~~~i!!!i~!;!ili .....................-.........-............... ...-............. ............-. ,.. ~~Cf\'~1:e'll:1freInen1s~.....', ,ii........, '" .:...'::: .. . .......... -... .. .... ...... ... ...........-... .................. ................. ...... ...................... ....................... ..... ................-.... ,. . ...... .........--.........--....--........-.... .... ...-..........--...........-..-...................... ..... .... . ...... .. .... ,-.. . .....-.-.. ....... ......... ......... ..-................. ......-........... Reference Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ~_.;v,-5.a"i.'... ~ .," ';-....,." "i..-' . /" ~.;.. .' STOP " [~J [~] Rl-l 30" x 30" Rl-3 12"x 6" Rl--4 T8"x 6" 2B-4 Stop Sign (Rl-I) STOP signs are intended for use where traffic is required to stop. The STOP sign shall be an octagon with white message and border on a red background. The standard size shall be 30 x 30 inches. Where greater emphasis or visibility is required, a larger size is recommended. On low- volume local streets and secondary roads with low approach speeds, a 24 x 24 inch size may be used. At a multiway stop intersection (sec. 2B-6). a supplementary plate (RI-3) should be mounted just below each STOP sign. If the number of approach legs to the intersection is three or more. the numeral on the supplementary plate shall correspond to the actual number of legs. or the legend ALL-WAY (RI-4) may be used. The supplementary plate shall have white letters on a red background and shall have a standard size of 12 x 6 inches (RI-3) or 18 x 6 inches (RI-4). A STOP sign beacon or beacons may be used in conjunction with a STOP sign as described in section 4E-4. Secondary messages shall not be used on STOP sign faces. fa . . . 2B-S Warrants for Stop Sign Because the STOP sign causes a substantial inconvenience to motorists, it should be used only where warranted. A STOP sign may be warranted at an intersection where one or more of the following conditions exist: 1. Intersection of a less imponant road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule is unduly hazardous. 2. Street entering a through highway or street. 3. Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. 4. Other intersections where a combination of high speed. restricted v~ew. and serious accident record indicates a need for control by the STOP . sIgn. Prior to t~e ~pplication of these warrants. consideration should be given I to less restrictive measures. such as the YIELD sign (2B-7) where a full R.... 9/84 28-2 estop is not necessary at all times. Periodic reviews of existing installations may be desirable to determine whether. because of changed conditions, the use of less restrictive control or no control could accommodate traffic demands safely and more effectively. STOP signs should never be used on the through roadways of expressways. Properly designed expressway interchanges provide for' the continuous flow of traffic, making STOP signs unnessary even on the entering roadways. Where at-grade intersections are temporarily justified for local traffic in sparsely populated areas, STOP signs should be used on the entering roadways to protect the through traffic. STOP signs may also be required at the end of diverging roadways at the intersection with other highways not designed as expressways. In most of these cases. the speeds will not warrant any great increase in the sign sizes. STOP signs shall not be erected at intersections where traffic control signals are operating. The conflicting commands of two types of control devices are confusing. If traffic is required to stop when the operation of the stop-and-go signals is not warranted, the signals should be put on flashing operation with the red flashing light facing the traffic that must stop. Where two main highways intersect, the STOP sign or signs should .ormally be posted on the minor street to stop the lesser flow of traffic. Traffic engineering studies. however, may justify a decision to install a . STOP sign or signs on the major street, as at a three-way intersection where safety considerations may justify stopping the greater flow of traffic to permit a left-turning movement. STOP signs may be used at selected railroad-highway grade crossings only after their need has been determined by a detailed traffic engineering study. Use of the STOP sign at railroad-highway grade crossings is described in Section 8B-9. Portable or part-time STOP signs shall not be used except for emergency purposes. Also, STOP signs should not be used for speed control. 11-48 (c) ROY. 3 VIII-S (c) ROY. 2 2B-6 Multiway Stop Signs The "Multiway Stop" installation is useful as a safety measure at some locations. It should ordinarily be used only where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal. A traffic control signal is more satisfactory for an intersection with a heavy volume of traffic. Any of the following conditions may warrant a multiway STOP sign installation (sec. 2B-4): _ 1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the ~nultiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to . control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installation. 28-3 Rev. 9/84 ... ' 1'.:."'., "':'~1'';'''.~....+'' "'S'-~ 'A " ' ~ 1_, ','j,~~... " ."" "'~ '. <;..!"~.' ' CITY OF ANDOVER AGENDA /'.0 SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED Finance FOR AGENDA Discussion . ITEM /'.0 TIF Modification Resolution ~ Jean D. McGann Finance Director BY~~ '1. On September 5, 1995 the city Council held a public hearing regarding the TIF modification. At this time it was agreed to accept the TIF modification. The Andover City Council is requested to pass by resolution the TIF modification as presented on the following pages. By passing the resolution tonight, it in no way affects the TIF \ bond sale set for September 19, 1995. I MOTION BY: SECOND BY: BXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF lINDOVBR, MINNESOTA HELD: September 5, 1995 Pursuant to due call and notice thereOf, a regular meeting of ~he City Council of the City of Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota, was duly held on the 5th day of September. 1995, at 7:00 p.m. The following members of the Council were present: and the following were absent; Member resolution and moved its adoption; RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MODI PI CATION OP THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.1, AND APPROVING THE MODIFICATION OF THB TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NOS. 1-1 AND 1-2 introduced the following WHEREAS: A. It h~a been proposed that the City of Andover, Minnesota (the "Citylt), modify the development program for Development District No.1, and modify the tax increment financing plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 anu 1-2 within Development Dist~ict No.1, under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134 and 469.174 to 469.179 (collectively, the ltAct"); and B. The City council has investigated the facts and has cau5ed to be prepared a proposed modification of the development program for Development District No.1, and has caused to be prepared a proposed modification of the tax increment financing plan for Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 and 1-2' uefining more p~ecisely increa~ed public costs to be included in Development District No. 1, and C. The City has performed all actions required by law to be per!ormed prior to the propose~ modification o! the development program fo~ Development Di~trict No.1, and the proposed modification of the tax increment financing plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 and 1-2, including, but not limited to, notification of Anoka County and Independent School District No. 11, and the holding of a public hea~ing upon published notice as required by law; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Andover as follows: 1. Development District No 1. The City is not modifying the boundaries of Development District No.1. 2. Modirication or the Development proqram. The Development Program for Development District No. 1 is amended as set forth in the Modification to the Development Program. 3. Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos 1-1 and 1.2. The City is not modifying the bound~ries of Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos_ 1-1 and 1-2_ 4_ Modification of the Tax Increment Financinq Plans. The Tax Increment ~inancing Plaus for Tax Increment ~inancing Districts Nos. 1-1 and 1-2 are amended ag set forth in the Modification of the Tax Increment Financing Plans. The City Council makes the following findings with respect to Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 and 1-2; (a) Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 and 1-2 when established were established as redevelopment districts as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd_ 10. The City reaffirms the findings previously made with respect to the establishment of Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 and 1-2. (b) The proposed redevelopment in the opinion of the City Council, would not occur solely through private inveatment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefore the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. The reasons supporting this finding are thest; Private investment will not finance these development activities because of prohibitive costs. It is necessary to finance theSe development activities through the use of tax increment financing ao that other development by private enterprise will occur within Development District No.1. (~) The Tax Increment Financing PlanS for Tax Incremsnt Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 and 1-2 conform to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City of Andover as a whole. The reasong for supporting this finding ara that: (i) Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 and 1-2 are properly zoned; and (ii) The tax increment financing plans will generally compliment and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's comprehensive plan. (d) The Tax Increment F~nancing Plans will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs ot the City of Andover as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of Development District No. 1 by private enterprise. The reasons supporting this finding are that: The development activities are necessary so that development and redevelopment by private enterprise can occur within Development District No.1. / 5. Public puroose. The Modification of the Development Program for Development District No.1, and the MOdification of the Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts NoS. 1-1 and 1-2 conform in all respects to the requirements of the Act and ~i11 help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up to provide employment opportunities to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. 6. Filino_ The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the Modification of the Development Program and MOditication or the Tax Increment Financing plans tor Tax Increment Financing Districce Noe. 1-1 and 1-2 ~ith the commissioner of Revenue_ The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the follo~ing voted in favor thereof: and ehe !ollowing voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNn OF ANOKA CITY 0];' ANDOWR I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Andover, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIPY that I have compared the attached and forssoing extract of minutes with the original thereot on file in my office, and that the same is a rul1, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City COuncil of said City, duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the City's development district. WITNESS my hand this 5th day of september, 1995. City Clerk / / 297458.1 MODIFICATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM POR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND MODIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT PINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NOS. 1-1 AND 1-2 CITY OF ANDOVER. MINNESOTA ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995 The City has heretofore established Development District No. 1 and adopted a Development program thereto. The capital and administration costs identieied in the Development Program and the property to be acquired, as adopted are amended to include the public costs and additional property set forth below. The City has established Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 and 1-2 within Development District No.1. The Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 and 1-2 are amended to reflect the following bUdget increases: $ 3,000,000 11,400,000 1.600.000 land acquisition and site improvements public improvements and public facilities administration expenses and costs of issuance tl16 000.000 total project costs and maximum principal amount of bonds to be issued In addition, the City intends to acquire the rOllowing property, PIN NUMBER 34-32-24-31-0012 34.32-24-31-0022 34-32-24&31-0003 34-32-24-42-0006 34-J2-24-4~-0001 34-32-24-42-0004 34-32-24-42-0005 34-32-24-42-0010 34-32-24-32-0005 34-32-24-32-0006 34-32-24-31-0014 34-32-24~31~0017 34-32-24-31-0018 34-32-24-31-0015 34-32-24-31-0009 34-32-24-31-0016 34-32-24-42-0003 34-32-24-42-0007 34-32-24-42-0002 34-32-24-14-0001 34-32-24-42-000B 34-32-24-42-0009 The City reserves the right to acquire any other prope~ty located within Development District No.1. 297458.1 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION September 19, 1995 DATE AGENDA SECTION NQ Discussion ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED Finance FOR AGENDA ITEM NQ TIF Bond Sale ~'" Jean D. McGann Finance Director BY'~t K Mr. Robert Thistle is here tonight to present the bids for the TIF Bond sale of $6,055,000. The City Council is requested to review this information and award the bid for the Bond sale. A resolution awarding the sale of the $6,055,000 TIF bond follows. ) j MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION September 19, 1995 DATE AGENDA 00. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Finance APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-discussion ITEM 00. Request for proposal City Insurance ~\)"" Jean D. McGann Finance Director BY~ q, City staff is requesting Council approval to request proposals for insurance coverage. An actual request has not been for several years and City staff feels.it would be in the City's best interest to obtain proposals from several insurance agents to determine if we have the appropriate insurance coverage at a reasonable cost. , j ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION September 19, 1995 DATE AGENDA f\O SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion Finance APPROVED FOR AGENDA Delinquent utility Bills -X' ~' Jean D. McGann Finance Director BY" - bid- ITEM f\O 10. On September 27, 1995 City staff will be sending notices to residents with delinquent utility bills. These.individuals with delinquent utility bills will have until November 7, 1995 to pay the delinquent amount. If the delinquent utility is not paid by November 7, 1995 it will be certified to the County Department of Property Tax Administration for collection. ) A listing of delinquent utility billings will be presented at the City Council meeting on October 3, 1995. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACflON September 19, 1995 DATE AGENDA SECnON NQ Non-discussion ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Finance APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM NQ AEC Update ~ Jean D. McGann Finance Director BV~ I\, BACKGROUND: The City of Andover has entered into a contract with Anoka Electric to perform the task of billing our residents for water, sewer 'and street light usage. CURRENT STATUS: , At this time the transition process is moving along fairly quickly. Anoka Electric is planning to complete a shadow billing for the 2nd quarter of 1995 by September 15, 1995. At this point City Staff will be analyzing the billing done by Anoka Electric to determine if it compares with our actual 2nd quarter billing. It is anticipated that City Staff will continue to post payments through September 25, 1995. On September 25, 1995, City Staff will perform the final download of information for Anoka Electric. On September 28, 1995, Anoka Electric will begin to read the meters for Andover residents. We expect Anoka Electric to be mailing statements to our residents on October 15, 1995. I City Staff will be doing a shadow billing for the 3rd quarter billing. By doing this, we can be assured that operations are being performed as expected. We will keep you updated as the transition process continues. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION September 19, 1995 DATE AGENDA tn SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-discussion Items Planning ~ \t., David L. Carlberg Planning Director ITEM t\O. Accept withdrawal of SUP Application - 1714 Bunker Lake Blvd. NW - Bob Bendtsen la, REQUEST The City Council is asked to accept the withdrawal of the Special Use Permit application of Robert Bendtsen to operate a repair garag,e on the property located at 1714 Bunker Lake Boulevard NtL Mr. Bendtsen is in the process of selling his property and will no longer need said Special Use Permit. The recording fee of $34.50 paid by Mr. Bendtsen will be reimbursed to him. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION September 19, 1995 DATE AGENDA f\O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-Discussion/Consent Item Scott Erickson, Engineering ~l ~ct ITEM f\O. Approve Encroachment Agreement/ Lots 1-4, Block 2, Jonathon woods ~3. . The City Council is requested to approve the attached encroachment agreements for Lots 1-4, Block 2, Jonathon woods development. , The encroachment agreement allows for the construction of a deck or patio within the drainage easement (maximum 12 ft. encroachment) at the rear of these lots. The agreement provides a hold harmless for the City and also allows for any future maintenance by the City of the ponding area. This agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney and found to be acceptable as written. J / MOTION BY: SECOND BY: tal.... LAW OFFICES OF S. TODD RAPP A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 1035 INTERNATIONAL PLAZA 7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVE BLOOMINGTON. MINNESOTA 55425 S, TODD RAPP ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN TELEPHONE (612) 854-5602 FACSIMILE (612) 854.5609 TIMOTHY A, NETZELL OF COUNSEL CERTIFIED AS REAL PROPERTY LAW AND CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN MINNESOTA AND ARIZONA August 25, 1995 Scott Erickson City of Andover 1685 NW Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 'I--'~ E r. fE' ~ \l i iF .- t'l.' .Itg~!ir"! ~ "~Mo.b u.-. t I1GUG 28 1;;;11 - RE: Lots 1 through 4, Block 2, Jonathan Wood My File No. 1135/01 CITY OF ANDOVER Dear Scott: I am enclosing three duplicate original encroachment Agreements relating to the above-referenced lots and a copy of the fax transmittal exchange between this office and William G. Hawkins and Associates. As you will note, the enclosed originals have been ; revised from that sent to Mr. Hawkins and approved only with respect to the identification in the second WHEREAS clause of the actual date of recordation of the final plat and the specific document number thereof. In all other particulars, the originals enclosed are identical with the document reviewed and approved by Mr. Hawkins. Tom Belting of Jonathan Woods, Inc. has requested I forward these to you for execution by the City of Andover. When this is complete, I recommend that you contact Mr. Belting via phone (494- 8101). It is my understanding that Mr. Belting will see that the Agreement is executed by Jonathan Woods, Inc. and properly recorded. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact this office or Mr. Belting. Very truly yours, ~R~ STR/tkg Enclosures cc: Tom Belting (via facsimile - 494-8191) ~ J AGREEMENT This Agreement dated this ____ day of , 1995, by and between Jonathan Woods, Inc., a Minnesota corporation and the City of Andover, a Minnesota municipal corporation. WITNESSETH; WHEREAS, Jonathan Woods, Inc. is the owner of certain real property located in the City of Andover, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, legally described as Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 2, Jonathan Woods; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the final plat for the said Jonathan Woods subdivision recorded on November 1, 1994 as Document No. 1141746, the City of Andover approved the said plat including said Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 2, subject to certain public drainage and utility easements all as shown and depicted on the said Plat; and WHEREAS, pursuant to applicable municipal codes and ordinances, permanent residential improvements may not permissibly be located or constructed upon or within a designated drainage and utility easement; and WHEREAS, given the size and configuration of said Lots I, 2, 3, and 4, Block 2, Jonathan Woods, the drainage and utility easements located thereupon render it impractical to construct residential improvements on said lots without appurtenant rear decks and patios encroaching upon' the designated drainage and utility easements located on said lots, NOW, THEREFORE, Jonathan Woods, through. their authorized and undersigned, agree as follows: Inc. and the City of Andover, designated representatives, 1. It is agreed that with respect to said Lots I, 2, 3 and 4, Block 2, Jonathan Woods, and no other lots within the said subdivision, the construction of appurtenant decks and rear patios, but no other improvements of any kind, shall be permitted to encroach upon the designated drainage and utility easements located on said lots to a distance not to exceed 12 feet, and provided that no such encroachments of any kind shall be permitted within any front-yard or side-yard set back areas or drainage and utility easements. 2. It is herewith acknowledged that it is an express condition of the City of Andover's permission as granted in !1, above that the same shall constitute no waiver of whatever kind or nature, expressed or implied, of the City of Andover's rights to use, maintain, enter upon, repair or otherwise benefit from any designated drainage and utility easement situated upon said Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 2, Jonathan Woods, and Jonathan Woods, Inc., or its successors and assigns, shall indemnify and hold the City of "l' / Andover harmless from any and all damages, claims or causes of action, including any e~p~nses associated with any said claims or causes of action, arlslng from the City of Andover's use, maintenance, or repair of the said drainage and utility easements. 3. It is further agreed that in the event any encroaching decks or patios are, or are required to be, disturbed, removed, damaged or affected in any way by reason of any use, maintenance, or repair of the subject drainage and utility easements by the City of Andover or its employees, agents, or contractors, all costs associated with any such removal, disturbance, or damage shall be incurred and paid for by the fee owner of the said lot upon which any such damaged, removed, or disturbed deck or patio shall be located. 4. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of any Woods, Inc. run with the land and shall bind and successor or interest to Jonathan JONATHAN WOODS, INC., a Minnesota corporation CITY OF ANDOVER, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: By: Its: Its: Dated: Dated: STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of , 1995, by , the of Jonathan Woods, Inc., a corporation under the laws of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public 2 / STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS COUNTY OF ) foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this , 1995, by ~ of the City of Andover, a municipal laws of Minnesota, on behalf of the municipal The day of the corporation under the corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: S. TODD RAPP, P.A. 1035 International Plaza 7900 International Drive Bloomington, MN 55425 (612) 854-5602 .' 3 .. -.<.:....... '\WEV '\ . "\ J';:;UU LNW UrrJI..ol:.::l rfiX NU. IH42::lUb P.Ol ,. " WILLIAM G. HAWKINS AND ASSOCIATES 299 Coon Rapids Boulevard, Suite 10 1 Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55433 'Bus. (612) 784-2998 Fax (612) 784-2305 ,./ ";','}' .~,.; .f TELECOPIER TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 23, 1995 TO: S. Todd Rapp FlRM: FAX #: 854-5609 FROM: Bill Hawkins OPERATOR: Wendy DeZelar TOTAL PAGES INCL1JDlNG THIS COVER SHEET: 5 COMMENTS: Re: Jonathan Woods, Inc.: the draft is acceptable as written. ORHilNAL WILL BE WILL NOT BE X MAILED The information .::onl";,,..d ;11 lhi.. facsimile menwe is atfomt-'J!.-DnviJef!ed and corrfidentlal information intended unlv (Of' the use of the individual 01' tmtitv named ~ If th~ reader of this mcssq;a i$ not th~ intended r~dpl",,'. )Jnu Cll'Il herebJl notified that ony dissemination. distribulion or copying of this communication is strictly pl'Ohlblted. If yOIl have received thies l:'lftw,ulIicafio1l in error, pleasc immediaiuly notify us by lctlephone and return the original message to us at the address listed above via the U.S. Postal S~7Victt. Th(llk you, IZ""'..;n.M:I' ~ , WED 12:01 ,uI,v ~HPP, P.R. LAW OFFICES TEL:612-854-S602 FAX NO. 7842305 Rug 22'95 P. 02 3:28 No.002 P.Ol '. I.jIl,W en'le,!'S Qf' S. TODD RAPP If, "'~O"ft"fO"'-"'~ ".'OCI"~IQ'" IO~ IN'TI"""A"'~N^l -I.A;rA 7.r.a IhlT'''''''^TrONAL DAIVI "LOQM'NGTON. """,N&;50TA 55.2' 8. T(,>DD RA"" I\O"'ITTl!.tJ "oe> "fIlIAO""t;t: ,.. ..IN.....O".. ....D ""'lte~flI!;JtN ""'."""'0"''1 It-., ..."....". "AC""""" ,.'"J "'''.i!I'~. TIMOTloIv ^, NlitZELL OJ' ~~V"'.'f. C1........'ItJ' ~ fIIML ,...C,."nTT l.^- AHO CWn.. ........l ....,c:lA,I.,.,. ey MtHHI'QTA .r/llT" ."tIII ".'00.''''10" ,""OM"""" TO ~lIII"C..tCt ... ...,NNlI!!80"" "NO ,.,.IZO'NA. }O"ACSIMILE COVER 511r::E'1' VQ NO'! U'Ap'_TItE MA'I'EI\11LLS,_HJU..G,H COLt-Of\' ilHLES5 'IJIIS coyER SHE.~:t 15 ADDRESSED 70 YOV~ TOI h/'/! 7I-Mh~~ FAC$IMUE * I 75''1-:J.3c5' OAtE: L.IZ Z I ,'1$- FROMI S. :rODJ2 R1\PP, P.1\. 4 , TotAL PAOES SENT: J\tl I&fr::, 1- 'I. AtK Z, ~ i1'l.<_L-;::~~ ,cJ,i,}<; 'V '. . tI " ~ ~1'1<AA,hJ f,tl of?/K/~~...? ~/lA-A".I'~_ ~.l4AA./J.J lI.J/ do ~'~ ~a,;I- -- ,~:W~~ ./ht.l~tL..l,~ Ad ~ 4iC,..1 'b? -10 (1~'-"~ ~ a.~ ~_. , . -----. ~ ThQ InforlllAH nn f!nnl',ai.ned in the facsinlj,1e me6sage j,5 attorney privlleged snd confldenti~l lnformaLion intended only for the u;e of the Indi..,l-du<ll or cn~.l..ty n81ned abov~. IJn1e66 the :nader of this mellllage is the 1P~ende(A. recipient, you at"e het'eby :lottrled that. ;our dlllDemlnation, diGtribution, or ~opying of ~hi; communication is ;trictly prohibited. If you nove received this ~u~"unicatlort in error, immediately notify the sender by t.Blephone Md nturn the original meS88Qe to us at the above nuu~~s6 vi~ th~ v.t. ~oct31 Service. :.., ~'" -'<. SW 1/4 SEe 28. --..., .................. ~ SW 1/4 SEe 26. ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ( I I I I I ~~ on -~ :tJ[>,- II II II 0;<-<0 0010 , o. 0-0 o~cn -; '...... ........- .;T :z: :;:: ...., ::ot>r- _ II II II ~~:i: ~ o~ I 0<:;;0 0::( f o 1!;:::; ;t7::/ (.; <0 n,' ~,- 111\ _ I~ ~~l ~ ~_~ r g. t '~-%l' o o ..: V4 ,..., <-< (Jl '" -:::> --. C> ?--, 01_ ~.:'" I 0> -... O>-J. .... ..j:>. ~'->I I?! ~ ~(1l I ~ r--:J -J / -- /~ ~ -=::::; -~ --...... ~ ..,: ~ -=; -~ -' -- -:-...... -; """ => ,..., (J1 ~ <-< .... / ~ ~ '" l'rl I 'l.", ~ ,of I ~,/<r"''' ......."""" 'Ci::i '-0'.,.......'\ /1/0'" , . r}~11 I I t..", (. if I ......' -""l,....,..... 0,..... '<: -#,'" ...,...,." 'r-,' ~ C) (') -rl -n :::Ot>'- /... ""- II II II () r.., N~N c,') rq ~~..... en;~ <.o(J1t,.,~=; (Jl-.-ex.: - <' (J'l .......... It (jI fo;... ....u,=:; =\J ...1: c, ~ , (, .'" '", :tJe>'- II II II -<-<<0 ~N~ to otQ (Jl~0 (Jl <.}. -7 "'- <- ~" ' '-JJ F'l -. c_ ............... - ...... ...... 'I I 00f'Tl ~~> Vl ...... ..... II f'Tlf'Tlr Ulf'Tl z ~ f'Tl -.........0 .........,...,~ .... 0... O~I ~ f'Tl ... UlI f'Tl f'Tlf'Tl () .Ul......... ~'" '" 01- ......... .... /11" '-' ~~ / \;\2 ~ ~ \J l' J' ~ C') -1 -< o 'TJ )> Z Q o <' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 19, 1995 AGENDA t-n SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-Discussion/Consent Item Todd J. Baas, Engineering ~ ~ ITEM t-n Approve Driveway Access Agreement/ 95-8 14. The City Council is requested to approve the driveway access agreement which was prepared by the City Attorney and executed by Patrick A'Bern. Attached with this item is the item that was presented to the City Council at their June 20, 1995 meeting. In the minutes the City Council requested that staff research to determine if the road has \ been accepted or maintained. In our research, we were unable to find ) any records that it has been maintained nor did any Public Works employees recall that it was maintained. We can tell you that the right-of-way does exist and was accepted when the plat was recorded. Based on previous agreements made by a previous City Council that was approved in 1992 on Poppy Street NW south of 173rd Avenue NW, we do request to reconsider this item for approval. , I , MOTION BY: SECOND BY: LAw OFFICES OF William G. Hawkins and Associates WILLIAM G. HAWKINS BARRY A. SULLIVAN Legal Assistants WENDY B. DEZELAR JEANINE KUZMICH SUITE 101 299 CooN RAPIDS BLVD. CooN RAPIDS, MINNEsarA 55433 PHONE (612) 784-2998 " June 27, 1995 Mr. Patrick Ahern 3620 157th Avenue N'N Andover, MN 55304 Re: Driveway Access Agreement Dear Mr. Ahern: Enclosed please find a proposed Driveway Access Agreement which would allow you to construct a driveway across 155th Avenue NW and use for access to your property. This type of agreement has been used in the past where one property needs / to access a public street. If this is acceptable, please sign and return three copies and I will have the City sign the Agreement and return one copy to you. rIJi' Willliam G. Hawkins WGH:vvbd Encs. cc: Mr. Todd Haas (w/enc.) DRIVEWAY ACCESS AGREEMENT ~ ~. 1- THIS AGREEMENT made this ~ day of '--y>" I , 1995, by and between the City of Andover (hereinafter referred to as "City") and Patrick Ahern (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owner"). WHEREAS, the City is the owner of dedicated street and utility right-of-way known as 155th Avenue NW; and WHEREAS, Property Owner is the owner of the following described property within the City of Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota: The South Half of the East 330 feet of Section 20. Townshio 32. Ranoe 24. Anoka Countv. Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as "Property"); and WHEREAS, Property Owner needs access to a publicly improved roadway over 155th Avenue NW in order to obtain a building permit for the Property; and , WHEREAS, the City of Andover has agreed to allow driveway access over 155th Avenue NW which would provide access to the Property Owner's land. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOllOWS: 1. The Property Owner is given the non-exclusive right to construct a driveway over the portions of 155th Avenue NW dedicated to the City as street and utility easements and shown on the map attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A. 2. The plans and specifications for the construction of the driveway must be submitted for approval to the City Engineer prior to commencement of any construction on the Property, 3. Nothing herein shall prohibit the City from allowing other parcels of property to use said street right-of-way for access purposes. If, in the future, the City deems it necessary to improve such street right-of-way in accordance with its street " standards, it shall be entitled to remove all improvements constructed by the Property Owner without reimbursement to the Property Owner for same. 4. Property Owner agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from any and all claims damages, suits, causes of action, or actions of any nature whatsoever which pertains to Property Owner's use of the City street right-of-way. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF ANDOVER / By By P~ERTY OW~ER l/dC(~ Patrick Ahern / 'I' .11 OF ANDOVER 65920 ...--..... - ,34 ~xC~ ~~~~ @ @ " ;:6.!1~OJO ~.._._ Ne CORNeR ~~ 20 ~~. - 157 TII A'ie. NW _ .-..- ,<<I~ .=- i~. .,. -- n~ "':"---!.'--' fJ) ($) ;- (dJ~ ,/~~ f.+) J .1 I .-.- .._,/ -,- '_M f>) ,,~ I . : \ ,. ; f') . (N; .; ~~ ~:I" \~ (I) ~ : ~ w w I 0: ~ (# CI) z M /!) ....---. ~- -- ~ r"j (,oj ~_..tO.~ _...._n. ~ F,/Jci"'.. ~ ~J)... i .' fJ) . l ~ M w (8) w , 0:, (;) I{ 7 li;\ 3 z .,,,..' ~ ',f '. '156TH AVE; 2 [j QJ , (1) f<,) . p,) . lJ , ~, it( => 0 , , / M; .___ _;0 Z I !~ i ! . ;~ " .." ...............;--:.--'" -"".'----' tr_..~ (:1) ~ ~~ l ('?J I' M\i ~, / --Q ~ m w " < ...J Q Z => o 0: ~i~: ~;t ~ ~ ,-- log_.M .. . ~N ..,.-NoIF ,,.~-Jlr I (,) r<; '~.. , J..' . l , >- LANE N.W. " ~ l " a;~ ~.II-'" ,C) , ".~.~ g~ ._- (8; ~~ <- 'e , &) /t) !lC I" . ~a~ 8 \:i:~ -!:!~ <;;: fa) W . !;;[>- ........ CI)~ >C) ....u z => o~ uCl -<: _ <t \-i~ I,' ; '- I': , ""'-- T(Hi . (i1I . " M -~ - i~o r~ -J , --I / / Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - June 20, 1995 / Page 16 (Amend Ordinance 8, Therapeutic Massage/Cabinet Making and Adopt Ordinance 109/Therapeutic Massage, continued) " MOTION by Dehn, Seconded by Kunza, to accept the ordinance amendment for Ordinance 8 other than therapeutic massage, that it not be included as a home occupation, but include cabinet making/woodworking as a home occupation. DISCUSSION: Mr. Carlberg explained as amended, no Special Use Permit would be required for the cabinet making/woodworking. The Council preferred that the use be limited to the R-l district and a Special Use Permit be required. Councilmember Dehn amended motion to allow cabinet making/woodworking as a Special Use only in the R-l district. Second Stands. Motion carried unanimously. ~155TH LANE/LAKERIDGE/IP95-B/DISCUSSION Mr. Erickson explained Pat A'Hern has inquired on the status of 155th Lane NW west of Silverod Street NW in Lakeridge. The right of way and subgrade exists, but it was never paved. Mr. A'Hern is concerned with who is responsible for having this 300 feet of street paved. Pat A'Hern, 3620 157th Avenue NW - stated that road was put in for / access to his property when Lakeridge was developed. He attended the meeting 17 years ago for that project and agreed with the Class 5 because the road was not needed and he had no plans to develop. It was his understanding that money was escrowed for paving in the future. The road was built but asphalt was not put on it. It was maintained for several years, then the maintenance stopped since no one used it. Now he would like to do a lot split and have l55th Lane as the access, and he'd like the promise made at the original hearing fulfilled. Mr. Erickson did not believe the City had money in escrow to pave that street. The Council felt if development is desired, there ~ust be a street constructed to City standards and maintained. Frank Stone, Public Works, did not recall maintaining that street in the 17 years he's been in the City. It is grown up with grass, and the Class 5 is gone. Mr. A'Hern - disagreed, arguing it was maintained when the development went in. There was a street sign there and it was plowed for the first five years. It has not been maintained since then at the choice of the City. Attorney Hawkins advised this situation is no different than the sketch plan earlier this evening. The City does not have an obligation to construct a street to benefit a developer. Mr. Erickson stated he will verify if the escrow has been released. The Council agreed to table the item to allow the Attorney and Staff investigate the original plat and the maintenance records and send a letter of the findings to Mr. A'Herns within a few days. If the records show. the road has not been accepted or maintained, the Council's position would be Mr. A'Hern's back parcel could not be built upon until the road is brought up to current standards. If it were to be blacktopped, the costs would have to be assessed. , ...---' . . CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION June 20, 1995 DATE AGENDA r..o. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Discussion Item Todd Haas, Engineering / BY: ITEM r..o. 155th Lane/Lakeridge/95-8 Discussion /rJ . The City Council is requested to discuss a problem that mayor may not exist on 155th Lane NW west of Silverod Street NW, Project 95-8, as requested by Pat A'hern. The right-of-way and subgrade for 155th Lane NW does exist but was never paved. We believe the property owner is concerned with who is responsible for having this paved now and/or in the future. We believe the removing of trees is also an issue. The street is , currently not being maintained by Public Works. Wi 1. Options Order Public Works to remove the existing trees from the street and boulevard and haul the necessary Class V to stabilize the subgrade. This would solve the problem of access to the site. The street could be paved in the future when Lakeridge streets have failed and will need to be reconstructed. 2. Require Mr. A'herns to remove trees and haul in Class V to stabilize the subgrade. Do nothing. 3. Staff recommends option 1. Note: If you recall in May 1992, this same situation came before you on 156th Avenue NW east of Quay Street NW in the same Lakeridge development, which was that the developer did not construct a bituminous pavement nor did the City keep an escrow for the construction because the City had agreed to accept the streets as they were and the escrows were released. /iI:I1"1 MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ..~~- - ~. .. " RECE~'V~.D .... . / MAR 1 3 1995 CITy V,-' Mi"o...ivvER Hr. Todd Haas City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd Andover. Minnesota 55304 - 3-) b - '1 ~ Dear Todd. I am sellinq 10 aC1:'es or mv proPl'!rtv at 3';20 lL,-Jr.h. This property is accessed by a road tor Lake R1dqe which is 155th. This road was put in to qive access tn the property when Lake Ridqe was developed by Larrv Carlson. I n~erl to know the City's position on the status of the road. I beleive ~t to be a public dedicated and maintained road but 1n my conversations with David Carlberq it appears that the city has some work to do or needs to blacktop the property to be consistent w1~h current procedures. Please prov1de me with the status of the road on whether the city consider 155th ott ot Silverod to be publiclY dedicated and maintained. Thank you My current address is 3620 157th,Andover,Mn.55304, e Sincerely 0v~ Pat A'Hern ,-- . \0 i I , I r '3 I I , ~ ~ I r I--- H / " / ' 104 LA". ......... . h Io. - .. ':~ isiATE,S4 ~ r .'~ - -;. . I' A 9( .\"OI,l>1l ' __ ....El>OO~S ~ 2,,0 ~o. 5,' - -i I ,. ,. . _ .A9 .rn I '/ \. 2, . : '<:: . I ----: I _____' LUNO'S -ROUNO.-LAKE. "E'STATES ~ '- ' ~,'.,' --,-_oj: '_ ~ : : f' .. ~J~~ , ;,',,' '!'- .. , ."~ . L ( ~ I z~zl/l.' . ?II t .0.11 II//!l ,,\'1':' ~_l:~'(' ,....- '. ~..."/ ~ -'-'5 1 4--', ~""7/.A' ',. \ , ,"1 O'H~50~. :. : -;- ,;,' I',. \,., .~';~. "~j , ,~T :,.L 1l1l;~P.{r':I\\',f-] .'S --iIj ~i~i. ,.1 -.- . rl' .",..,;T ,.-. ~"r\ \ ~'\/ J ~ ^A}C~LL!..:-.! 4 ZO ,'I '.UTi.., \ ,.!I'll,' :..... ".ZZ'11 ~'/Hi ~ h ' vr-: Z' .- "..( ,~. _""'":~"l',,--,,, L'-' '-, : .) . ...... ~ U :nz~_ t~., . I I ..... I ~ _I" . -.:--,..=' "... 61 - - . ,,!, "".i/'- _ I. I I' ~~CfJ . 4 "~~,'" "... -- ~ ANDOVER ' ....~t1 _" ' " -Tf:~'<:':" ~ "( ~" ' . I' I,.- ~ . ii: , / ~ .. 'I' ~_---;;--"-~~~\ItHZ\l)r.... 9/ :, '~~"-:';:l '11 ~~ _ :- ~ ,,_ "l"(.. I '" '"' '''I, -, . - r, - I- - "" .... 7 I f-, :oi ~ ~ ! "re.:-i ~.'EkN'S:'- F-.i/ ~~~.. ff/' ";'!... "".IMi'" i""fj! I' i~,C; T, :BqIJND~Y~ ~.'9'~ !!~~" .r.t1,'f;----~t:::J ' '....., ~'. ~' ~ ,." 'I'r,,~' ;r-..j '~QQ'2' ,.... oS,;', . u "~. 1.i\~~,O~. 'cot.iM1'ss;~~ ~~::...L':'" ;HN'S 2ND "lOll. ,. .. r A's. "" 1"J:fj.l-;-'.L . '. '.~ , ,',' '~' "j _.' "'\"'''''''\'.. S"''','' ..w, ,'" I .,1;1,;00, "I' " · .. I :, X:-~ ,r 'lrl~ '0179. J. r ::;...' . I i~1L' /,. >.... -.... ~+.,,(~\. I.NP~ rI:::.!, l -, I _: ~,~ ,.U_ Ail...... I .....! ' ~ Ii"; 5"" , Tl, ,\ I ' I ~/o/:. 6' ,-~., ,. r f 6 : I 7'"4 +J~ 1 --T---- ~ ~ H'lA1/}~ i I'!';K~DLEC'",~ <=== ~ v:':l "'1 F Z;"D';:~::;D',;~m:,:- '-t, :(,~;.'.1. ~r'l ROUND , -- LAKE - - , : : 'y/ ...;-... I. . . ,,;.... " ~ ," . .;''/1 :\ oS "r""''' .. -4 ~ I- .2...,U ~ 1 ~.:~ ~J~'\~ ~ ~~~ -'0 :. , ::;;',0 ~ t" . "!-u ~ --.;- ~~'- '" l ~ IJ ~ .: ~'_ ,,4 ~ ~..'.~.~. '~;~ .f '" 'I~': . + ~ j :~.~"<:,! ~ ! " .. : .1 "....-...........::: - b p.t<C OOO\" ,~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 19, 1995 AGENDA f\O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA u ...., __..__, __ ,~ L Tt-om Scot~ Eri~kson,~( Eng~neer~ng ~v ITEM f\O. \0, Approve plans & Specs/94-32/Well #5 (phase II)/Pumphouse BY: . ~ The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving final plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bids for Project"94-32, Well #5 (Phase II) for pumphouse construction. The pumphouse was originally discussed as a submersible-type of pumping facility. After reviewing the costs associated with a submersible-type system as compared to a pumphouse facility, a pumphouse facility was found to be more cost effective to construct and operate. The drilling of well #5 (Phase I) has been completed by E.H. Renner & Sons. The test pumping of the well indicates a productive well for the City with a pumping yield exceeding 1,000 gallons per minute. I MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 94-32, WELL #5 (PHASE II) FOR PUMPHOUSE CONSTRUCTION. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 015-95, adopted by the City Council on the 7th day of February , 19 95, TKDA has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 94-32 for pumphouse construction; and WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications the City Council for their review on the 19th September , 19 95 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications . were presented to day of BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids to be opened at 10:00 AM Thursday, October 12 , 19 95 at the Andover City Hall. MOTION seconded by Councilmember adopted by the City Council at a and regular meeting this 19th day of September , 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmembers voting against same whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk / - .. ~'.-...'. O. tl-~.,...",'c_"" '"-. 71-..:1 .. -.,.,'" ........... ...~..__. ,--.~~~ TKDA TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED ENGINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS 1500 PIPER JAFFRAV Pt.AZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUl, MINNESOTA 55101.2140 PHONE:612f202-4400 FAX.:612/202-00B3 June 29, 1995 .RECEIVED :Mr. Scott Erickson City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, Minnesota 55304 JUL 05 1995 CITY OF ANUOVER Re: Well Purnphouse No.5 City of Andover, Minnesota Commission No. 10833-02 Dear :Mr. Erickson: Attached is the cost estimate that was discussed at our meeting with Frank Stone and Brian Kraabel on June 13, 1995. The estimate compares the costs of a submersible pump installation with those of a pumphouse and vertical turbine pump and motor installation. The fIrst costs of the pumphouse installation is the most economical. From an operating standpoint, the effIciency of a submersible motor is 84% while the effIciency of a vertical hollow shaft motor is 94%. The pumphouse installation will result in approximately $1,OOO/year electrical energy savings over the submersible installation. TIlls is based on the pump being operated 8 hours per day average and doesn't include energy demand savings. TKDA recommends that a pumphouse be build for Well No.5 in lieu of the submersible pump installation. Per th.e di..-cction received at the meeting, we are proceeding with the pumphouse design. If there are any questions, please call. 0~~ David L. Moore, P.E. DLM/mha cc: John Davidson, TKDA Dave Kirkwold, TKDA .--- (It . ANDOVER WELL NO.5 Submersible Pumphouse Installation Installation Site Work $5,000 $5,000 Excavation and Backfill 1,500 3,000 Building 25,000 Pump 4,000 5,000 Motor 19,800 9,000 Pitless Adapter 32,000 Piping and Valves 2,900 5,600 Meter 1,800 1,800 Meter Manhole 2,000 Electrical 10,000 10,000 Mechanical H&V,A.P. 2,500 Controls 5.000 5.000 $84,000 $71,900 10% Contingency 8.400 7.190 $92,400 $79,090 .' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION September 19, 1995 DATE Non-Discussion/Consent Item Scott Erickson~ Engineering ~u APPROVED FOR AGENDA AGENDA ton SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM ton Approve Final payment/SuperAmerica utilities/93-10 BY: JiL J.._ \lo. The city Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting work and directing final payment to Ro-So Contracting for Project 93-10, SuperAmerica, for the improvement of sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer construction. \ j \ , / MOTION BY: SECOND BY: I CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING RO-SO CONTRACTING OF SANITARY SEWER, IN THE FOLLOWING AREA: WORK AND DIRECTING FINAL PAYMENT TO FOR PROJECT NO. 93-10 FOR THE IMPROVEMENT WATERMAIN AND STORM SEWER SUPERAMERICA WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Andover on February 15 , 19 94, Ro-So Contracting of Centerville, MN has satisfactor~completed the construction in accordance wlth such contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, Minnesota that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full. / MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 19th day of September , 19 95 , with Councilmembers and Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, voting against, whereupon said resolution was passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED Engineers-Architects-Planners Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PADO:NTS Estimate Project Location Contractor FINAL No.-3- Period Ending August 7, 19~ Superamerica Utilities 193-10) City of Andover. Minnesota Ro-So Contractina Page 1 of 1 Comm. No. 10406 Original Contract Amount $ 32.677.20 Total Contract Work Completed Total Approved Credits Total Approved Extra Work Completed Change Order No. 1 $ + 7 293 20 Approved Extra Orders Amount Completed $ 36.496.45 $ $ 7.293.20 Total Amount Earned This Est~ate $ 43.789.65 Less Approved Credits Less ~% Retained Less Previous Payments Total Deductions $ $ 0 00 $ 43.351.75 $ 43.351. 75 Amount Due This Estimate $ 437.90 Contractor ~ :Do.J3~ Date 8- 110- 95 Engineer Date ~~~~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 19, 1995 AGENDA t-n SEcnON ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-Discussion/Consent Item Scott EricksonV Engineering cPG ITEM t-n Declare Cost/Order Assessment Roll/94-11/Andover Center BVO)- l'1. The City Council is- requested to approve the resolution declaring cost and directing preparation of assessment roll for the improvement of sanitary sewer and watermain, for Project 94-11, Andover Center. ) , , MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN , FOR ANDOVER CENTER A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 94-11, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $ 38,433.50, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ 38,433.50 and work previously done amount to $ ~O- so that the total cost of the improvement will be $ 38,433.50 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 38,433.50 2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1995, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 19th day of September, 19 95 , with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor vlctoria Volk - City Clerk " CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION September 19, 1995 AGENDA r-o SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item ITEM r-o Set Hearing for Proposed Assessment/94-ll/Andover Center \~, DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA scot~ Eri~kson,~ Eng~neer~ng ()fL-' ~(Y The City Council is requested to approve the resolution for hearing on proposed assessment for the improvement of Project 94-11, Andover Center. I j , / MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ) RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR PROJECT NO. 94-11 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on September 19, 19 95 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improvements for Project No. 94-11 ; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN: 1. A hearing shall be held the 17th day of October, 1995, in the City Hall at 7:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper ,at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice ;the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular Meeting this 19th day of September , 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ! ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 19, 1995 AGENDA t-n SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-Di :;nn/Con!':ent Item Scott Erickson,/ Engineering a,'L W: . J :'\ . ~l_ I:Y ITEM t-n Declare Cost/Order Assessment Roll/94-2l/13920 Crosstown Blvd. ,q. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring cost and directing preparation of assessment roll for the improvement of watermain for Project 94-21, 13920 Crosstown Boulevard NW. , j / MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN , FOR PROJECT NO. 94-21, 13920 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $ 3,688.26 , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ 3,688.26 and work previously done amount to $ -0- so that the total cost of the improvement will be $ 3,688.26 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 3,688.26 2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 5 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1995, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 19th day of September , 19 95 , with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION September 19, 1995 DATE AGENDA t-O SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Scot~ Eri~kson'^r Englneerlng (JJ Non-Discussion/Consent Item ITEM t-O Set Hearing for Proposed Assessment/94-21/13920 Crosstown Drive NW y ~, The City Council is requested to approve the resolution for hearing on proposed assessment for the improvement of Project 94-21, 13920 Crosstown Drive NW. / MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR PROJECT NO. 94-21 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on September 19, 19~, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improvements for Project No. 94-21 ; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN: 1. A hearing shall be held the 17th day of October, 1995, in the City Hall at 7:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice /the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular Meeting this 19th day of September , 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER / ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk AGENDA t-.O. ITEM t-.O. ex\. , I I j CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION September 19, 1995 SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item Declare cost/Order Assessment Roll/94-27/14268 Woodbine st. NW DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT scot~ Eric;:ksony EngJ.neenng CJR APPROVED FOR AGENDA ~ The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring cost and directing preparation of assessment roll for the improvement of watermain for Project 94-27, 14268 Woodbine Street NW. NW. ' MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. J MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN , FOR PROJECT NO. 94-27, 14268 WOODBINE STREET NW THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $ 3,587.92 , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ 3,587.92 and work previously done amount to $ -0- so that the total cost of the improvement will be $ 3,587.92 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 3,587.92 2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 5 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1995, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 19th day of September , 19 95 , with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 19, 1995 AGENDA r-..o. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ".-- _T\~ .,,..,,.,.,~ "n -- .. Tt-..m scot~ Eri~kson?,( Englneenng rI'L ITEM r-..o. Set Hearing for Proposed Assessment/94-27/14268 Woodbine Street NW BY: ~ M. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution for hearing on proposed assessment for the improvement of Project 94-27, 14268 Woodbirie Street NW. ) , / MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. I MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR PROJECT NO. 94-27 WHEReAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on September 19, 19 95 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improvements for Project No. 94-27 ; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN: 1. A hearing shall be held the 17th day of October, 1995, in the City Hall at 7:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice ,the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be ,given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular Meeting this 19th day of September , 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION DATE September 19, 1995 AGENDA 1\0. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-Discussion/Consent Item Scot~ Eri<;=kson'n( Englneenng (}'L ITEM 1\0. Declare Cost/Order Assessment Roll/94-29/1519 - 148th Lane NW BY: ();P M. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring cost and directing preparation of assessment roll for the improvement of sanitary sewer for Project 94-29, 1519 - 148th Lane NW. Note: The proposed assessment is ~ of this lot only. \ ) ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. I 'MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER, FOR PROJECT NO. 94-29, 1519 - l48TH LANE NW THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $ 5,852.32 , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ 5,852.32 and work previously done amount to $ -0- so that the total cost of the improvement will be $ 5,852.32 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 5,852.32 2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 5 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1995, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 19th day of September, 19 95 , with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION september 19, 1995 DATE AGENDA t-n SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-Discussion/Consent Item Scot~ Eric;:ksont/( Englneenng (1L ITEM t-n Set Hearing for Proposed Assessment/94-29/1519 - 148th Lane NW 7);v al.\. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution for hearing on proposed assessment for the improvement of Project 94-29, 1519 - 148th Lane NW. ) \ ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. / MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR PROJECT NO. 94-29 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on September 19, 19~, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improvements for Project No. 94-29 ; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN: 1. A hearing shall be held the 17th day of October, 1995, in the City Hall at 7:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice ~he total co~t of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be ,given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular Meeting this 19th day of September , 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER .ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION September 5, 1995 DATE AGENDA f\O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion/Consent Item Todd J. Haas, Engineering ~ APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM f\O. Accept Petition/95-6/ACCAP Properties ~ 80, ) The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring adequacy of petition and ordering preparation of a feasibility report for the improvement of watermain, Project 95-6, in the area of 3541 - l35th Lane NW, 3542 - l36th Avenue NW and 3543 - l36th Avenue NW (ACCAP properties). These are the properties the City and ACCAP would share the assessments equally. unfortunately, the City must by law proceed through Minnesota Statute Chapter 429 proceeding. We have discussed this with ACCAP and they do not have a problem with the process. Attached is the petition. I MOTION BY: SECOND BY: . CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN , PROJECT NO. 95-6 , IN THE 3541 - 135TH LANE NW, 3542 - 136TH AVENUE NW AND 3543 - 136TH AVENUE NW (ACCAP PROPERTIES) AREA. WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition, dated September 14, 1995 , requesting the construction of improvements; and WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to represent the signatures of 100% of the affected property owners requesting such improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city Council of the City of Andover that: 1. The petition is hereby declared to be 100% of owners of property affected, thereby making the petition unanimous. 2. Escrow amount for feasibility report is -0- I 3. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to the City Engineer and he is instructed to provide the City Council with a feasibility report. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular Meeting this 19th day of September 19 95 , with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor victoria volk - City Clerk SEP-14-1995 16:35 P.01 I I ANOIctA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM, INC. 1201 S~AvQnuQ NE. Sullo 346' Sl~i".. MN 65434. Phone 783~747' FAX 7834700'l1Y 763-4724 G A_.., "90.... September 13. 1995 Sfl :+- J ?~~ 13( ~ 13)#7 - I I Andover City EJ~' =- 1685 Crosstown Ivd. NW /.;<- Andover, MN 304 I PhcnA /I PIlone , RE: MunicipaIllmprovements fa.. Faxf 1. 3S42 ~36th Avenue NW 2. 3541 ~3Sth Lane NW 3. 3543 ~36th Avenue NW I , i Dear City En~: I We do hereby ~tiOD for improvements of watennain with the costs of the improvement to be assessed ~lIlilt my benefitting property. . Said petition is uhanimous and the public bearing may be waived. We would like to be assessed over a 4ve year period. ! . Sincerely. ~~~ Executive Direc:tor I Property Owner:\ ACCAP. Inc. Address: 1201. 9th Avenue NE. Slolite 345 Bl' . MN 55434 Phone: 783-474 .. ~~l / AN J;OUAL OPPOi=lnJNITY EMPLOYER TOTAL P.Bl CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 19, 1995 AGENDA t-O SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-Discussion/Consent Item Todd J. Haas, Engineering ~ ~c1 ITEM t-O Accept Feasibility Report/Waive Hearing/95-6/ACCAP properties 8..Co . , / The city Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting feasibility study, waiving public hearing, ordering improvement and directing preparation of plans and specifications for the improvement of Project 95-6 for watermain construction in the area of 3541 - 136th Lane NW, 3542 - 136th Avenue NW and 3543 - 136th Avenue NW (ACCAP properties). Feasibility Report The proposed assessment for each lot is as follows: Water Area Charge 75 ft. x 150 ft. = 11,250 sq. ft. x 1 Acre x $1,110 = $284.00 43,560 Acre sq. ft. Water Connectio~ Charge = $1,190.00 Lateral Charge 75 ft. x $22 Per Lot - $1,650.00 TOTAL $3,124.00 (Assessment Per Lot) Note: Per the agreement made at the July 18, 1995 City Council meeting, the City of Andover is responsible for half of the assessment for each lot. \ , MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING, PREPARATION OF PLANS AND OF PROJECT 95-6 FOR IN THE FOLLOWING AREA AVENUE NW AND 3543 - 136TH AVENUE A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT WATERMAIN 3541 - 135TH LANE NW, 3542 - 136TH NW (ACCAP PROPERTIES) WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 19th day of September , 19 95 , order the preparation of a feasibility study for the improvements; and WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by the Assistant City Engineer and presented to the Council on the 19th day of __ september, 19 95 ; and WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a Public Hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and declares the improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of $ 9,372.00 / NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Andover to hereby receive the feasibility total cost of improvements of $ 9,372.00 Hearing and order improvements. City Council of the City of report with an estimated , waive the Public BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City City Engineer to prepare the plans improvement project. Council to hereby direct the and specifications for such MOTION seconded by Councilmember the City Council at a regular and adopted by meeting this 19th day of September, 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - c~ty Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 19, 1995 AGENDA rn SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-Discussion/Consent Item scot~ Eri7kson,b~ Englneen.ng IJ ITEM rn Declare Cost/Order Assessment Roll/95-6/ACCAP Properties y &'1. The city Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring cost and directing preparation of assessment roll for the improvement of watermain for Project 95-6 for 3541 - 135th Lane NW, 3542 - 136th Avenue NW and 3543 - 136th Avenue NW (ACCAP properties). ) \ ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. / MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT WATERMAIN , FOR PROJECT NO. 95-6 , - 136TH AVENUE NW AND 3543 - 136TH AVENUE A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF 3541 - 135TH LANE NW, 3542 NW (ACCAP PROPERTIES) . THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $ 4,686.00 , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ 4,686.00 and work previously done amount to $ -0- so that the total cost of the improvement will be $ 4,686.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 4,686.00 2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 5 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1995, and shall , bear interest at the rate of 7 percent per annum from the I date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 19th day of September, 19 95 , with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER , J ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 19, 1995 AGENDA tn SEcnON ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-Di ion/Consent Item Scott Erickson'l Engineering ~'L ~ ITEM tn Set Hearing for Proposed Assessment/95-6/ACCAP properties 8.&'. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution for hearing on proposed assessment for the improvement of Project 95-6 for 3541 - 135th Lane NW, 3542 - 135th Lane NW and 3543 - 136th Avenue NW (ACCAP properties). ) ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR PROJECT NO. 95-67 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on September 19, 19 95 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improvements for Project No. 95-6 ; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN: 1. A hearing shall be held the 17th day of October, 1995, in the City Hall at 7:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice ~he total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be ,given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the as.sessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular Meeting this 19th day of September , 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER -ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 19, 1995 AGENDA t-O SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-Discussion/Consent Item Scott Erickson, Engineering ~t ~ ITEM t-O Approve Feasibility Report/95-19/ 13748 Round Lake Boulevard GA. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting the feasibility report, waiving public hearing, ordering improvement and di~ecting preparation of plans and specifications for the improvement of Project 95-19 for watermain in the area of 13748 Round Lake Boulevard NW. \ I Feasibility Report The proposed assessment is based on 1995 rates as follows: Area Charge 107.5 ft. x 230 ft. = 24,725 square feet x 1 Acre x $1100 = $624.37 43,560 Acre sq. ft. Connection Charge = $1,190.00 t~~~~a~t~h~r~~2 _______________________________________ = $2,365.00 ========= TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $4,179.37 The property owner has waived his rights to a public hearing. I MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA / RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING, AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT 95-19 FOR WATERMAIN IN THE FOLLOWING AREA 13748 ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD NW WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 5th day of September, 19 95 , order the preparation of a feasibility study for the improvements; and WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by the City Engineer and presented to the Council on the 19th day of September, 19~; and WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a Public Hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and declares the improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of $ 4,179.37 , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Andover to hereby receive the feasibility total cost of improvements of $ 4,179.37 Hearing and order improvements. City Council of the City of report with an estimated , waive the Public / MOTION seconded by Councilmember the City Council at a regular and adopted by Meeting this 19th day of September, 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE September 19, 1995 AGENDA 1\0 SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non-Discussion/Consent Item scot~ Eri~kson,A( EngJ.neenng qJ7.. ITEM 1\0 Declare Cost/Order Assessment Roll/95-19/13748 Round Lake Boulevard NW ~~ 60, The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring cost and directing preparation of assessment roll for the improvement of watermain for Project 95-19, 13748 Round Lake Boulevard NW. \ / ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. / MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN , FOR PROJECT NO. 95-19, 13748 ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD NW THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $ 4,179.37 , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ 4,179.37 and work previously done amount to $ -0- so that the total cost of the improvement will be $ 4,179.37 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost to be assessed against beneflted property owners is declared to be $ 4,179.37 2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 5 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1995, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7 percent per annum from the , date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. I 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 19th day of September , 19 95 , with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: / J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION September 19, 1995 DATE AGENDA N:l SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED Scott Erickson,) FOR AGENDA Engineering ~~ Non-Discussion/Consent Item ITEM N:l Set Hearing for Proposed Assessment/95-19/13748 Round Lake Boulevard NW ~ <31. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution for hearing on proposed assessment for the improvement of project 95-19, 13748 Round Lake Boulevard NW. \ / '1 ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA \ RES. NO. / MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR PROJECT NO. 95-19 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on September 19, 19~, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improvements for Project No. 95-19 ; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN: 1. A hearing shall be held the 17th day of October, 1995, in the City Hall at 7:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice ,the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be ,~iven to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular Meeting this 19th day of September , 19~, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE "9pt ,~. '99~ AGENDA t-.O SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion Richard Fursman City Administrator APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM t-.O Permanent Status - D. Brown j);L 361. The Council is requested to take action position of "Secretary B" as permanent. serving in that capacity since 1992. The .position was established as full-time temporary in 1992, with the thought that work may slow down. The years between 1992 and today have been the busiest ever. There is no doubt that the position is warranted. to formally declare the Dorothy Brown has been ) '\ ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE !l9pt 1~, H"; AGENDA t\O. SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion Richard Fursman City Administrator APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM t\O. Assessment Contract Renewal :D/~ 33. The Council is requested to renew the contract for assessment services with Anoka County for the years 1996-2002. The contract for 1996 for the amount of $67,000 represents a 14.7% increase over 1995. (See budget on following page) The budget for assessing is growing, and would appear to be "too high." One might think that the City could do it's own assessing for the same cost or possibly cheaper. I have investigated the costs associated with assessing and have concluded that we are better off contracting with the County. , ) I have included a copy of the City of Anoka's budget for their assessing division for your review as a comparison. \ I MOTION BY: SECOND BY: FUND GENERAL CODE NO. CLASSIFICATIONS Purchased Services 301 Professional Services CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 1996 ANNUAL BUDGET DEPARTMENT GENERAL GOVERNMENT 1994 ACTUAL $ 53,853 GRAND TOTAL $ 53,853 Page 3 DIVISION ACCOUNT ASSESSING 101-41550 1995 BUDGET 1996 BUDGET ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED $ 53,860 $ 58,400 $ 67,000 $ 53,860 $ 58,400 $ 67,000 CITY OF ANOKA, MINNESOTA 1996 ANNUAL BUDGEr I FUND DEPARTMENT DIVISION ACCOUNT '--../ GENERAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT ASSESSING 101-4053 CODE 1993 1994 1995 BUDGET 1996 BUDGET NO. CLASSIFICATIONS ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED Personal Services 1010 Full-time Reg. Hr. Earnings $101,020 $125,793 $112.300 $112,300 $112,300 1060 Interdept. Labor Services (7,222) 1091 PERA Contribution 4,464 5.442 5.200 5,200 5.200 1092 F.I.C.A. Contribution 6.936 8,175 9.000 9,000 9.000 1093 Hospital Contribution 7,309 8.535 9.000 9.000 9.000 1094 Term-Life Insurance 630 555 700 700 700 Total 120.359 141.278 136.200 136.200 136.200 Contractual Services 1120 Communications 3.371 5,247 3.100 4.100 4.300 1128 Data Processing Charges 1,200 1,200 1,200 1.200 2.100 1139 Continuing Education 443 354 1.000 1,000 1.000 1150 Insurance 3.600 3,600 3,600 3,600 2,400 1154 Maintenance & Repairs 328 140 200 200 200 1158 Memberships & Subscriptions 111 369 500 500 500 , / 1160 Mileage 1,041 1.036 1.200 1.200 1.300\...-/ 1186 Taxes and Licenses 110 100 100 100 Total 10,094 12.056 10.900 11.900 11.900 Supplies 1340 General Supplies 41 1,098 200 200 200 1358 Office Supplies 854 882 1.000 1.000 1,000 Total 895 1,980 1.200 1.200 1.200 FUNCTION TOTAL $131,348 $155.314 $148,300 $149.300 $149,300 "--.J 11 CITY OF ANOKA, MINNESOTA ," ""'\ ANNUAL BUDGET ASSESSING FUNCTION' This division is responsible for assessment for all real and personal property for valuation purposes. " / r '\ 10 , I CI1Y OF ANOKA, MINNESOTA ( J ANNUAL BUDGET ASSESSING FUNCTION' This division is responsible for assessment for all real and personal property for valuation purposes. ( J l / 10 Anoka County Contract No. 900375' / JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF ANDOVER AND COUNTY OF ANOKA FOR ASSESSMENT OF PROPERTY THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of 1995, by and between the City of Andover, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard Northwest, Andover, Minnesota 55304, hereinafter referred to as the "Municipality," and the County of Anoka, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, 2100 Third Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, hereinafter referred to as the "County. " WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, pursu.ant to Minn. Stat. ~ 273.072, any county and city, lying wholly or partially within the county and constituting a separate assessment district, may, by agreement entered into under Minn. Stat. ~ 471.59, provide for the assessment of property in the city by the county assessor; and , WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. ~273.03, subd. 2, the agreement may provide for the abolition of the office of the city assessor when the assessment of the property within the city is to made under an agreement by the county assessor; and / WHEREAS, it is the wish of the county to cooperate with the municipality to provide for a fair and equitable assessment of the property within the Municipality; and WHEREAS, said work will be carried out in accordance with the provisions of Minn. Stat. ~ 471.59. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed as follows: I. That said Municipality constitutes a separate assessment district which lies wholly within the county and that all property in the geographical boundaries of this district shall be assessed by the County Assessor of the County beginning with the assessment year 1997, provided this Agreement is approved by the Commissioner of Revenue. II. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. ~ 273.072, subd. 2, the office of the city assessor in the Municipality shall cease to exist on January 16, 1996, but not before the end of the term of the current city assessor, if serving for a fixed term, or when an earlier vacancy occurs; provided, however, that , ~ '\ ) upon the termination of this AEreement, the office of city assessor shall be automatically reestablished and shall be filled as provided by applicable law or charter in accordance with Minn. Stat. ~ 273.072. III. The term of this Agreement shall be from January 16, 1996, through assessment services performed in the year 2002, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. IV. In consideration of said assessment services, the Municipality shall pay to the County an annual payment as follows: 1997 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1997 1998 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1998 1999 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 1999 2000 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 2000 2001 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 2001 2002 Assessment services payable on or before January 15, 2002 V. For 1997 assessment services, the Municipality shall pay the County as follows: A. Eight Dollars and 37/I00s ($8.37) for each improved parcel of residential, seasonal recreational residential and agricultural type property B. Fifty-Two Dollars and 23/loos ($52.23) for each improved and unimproved parcel of commercial, industrial and public utility type of property C. Fifty-One Dollars and 18/1oos ($51.18) for each improved and unimproved parcel of apartment and mobile home park type property D. Two Dollars and 62/100s ($2.62) for each unimproved residential, seasonal recreational residential and agrlcultural type property The same procedure shall be used, as described above, in the computation of the assessment payments due in 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002, provided, however, that the cost for each type of parcel shall be increased according to the County Assessor's increase in operating costs, cost of living and merit adjustments established by the Anoka County Board of Commissioners for January 1 to December 31 in the year prior to the date of the assessment. VI. Notwithstanding Section III. above, the County and/or Municipality shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by providing, at a minimum, two years written notice by certified mail, J - 2 - " which notice shall be sent prior to January 2 of any year to terminate assessment services to be performed ) two years from such date (Le. to terminate this Agreement for assessment services in the year 2000, the party must provide written notice of termination by not later than January 2, 1998). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunder set their hands on the dates written below. COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF ANDOVER By: Dan Erhart, Chairman County Board of Commissioners By: Title: Dated: Dated: ATTEST By: John "Jay" McLinden County Administrator By: Title: Dated: Dated: , , J APPROVED AS TO FORM By: Dan Klint Assistant County Attorney By: Title: Dated: Dated: The above Agreement is hereby approved by the Commissioner of Revenue this ,19 day of By: Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue dklcontmctlandover.aop - 3 - CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Sept. 19, 1995 AGENDA t-.O. SECTION Non-Discussion ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Richard Fursman City Administrator APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM t-.O. Probationary Period/Fire Chief c3~. BY: -\j~ The Council is requested to acknowledge the successful completion of the 6 month probationary period for Fire Chief, Dan Winkel. Mr. Winkle has demonstrated competence and composure under difficult circumstances. He works well with City staff and fire fig~ters alike. His experience and thorough understanding of running a volunteer fire department will benefit Andover for years to come. I I ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Sept. 19, 1995 DATE AGENDA f\O. SECTION Non-Discussion ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED Richard Fursman FOR AGENDA City Administrator ITEM f\O. Rescind Assessment Agreement/ Andover partnership -v &. The Council is requested to take the necessary action to resclnd the assessment agreement with Andover PartnerShip. (Downtown Center) The agreement was first drafted to ensure a taxable value of $3,~00,000 was maintained on the property. This was done to guarantee that enough tax increment would be generated to payoff the original bonds. , ) As it now stands, the agreement once drawn to protect the City, will now hurt the City. If the agreement stands, the new bonds will have to be sold as "taxable." This means about a 2% interest increase to be paid on the bonds being sold to purchase the salvage yards. By rescinding the agreement, the bonds can be sold as "tax free" with the interest savings. The present value on downtown center is greater than the amount identified in the agreement, and with the improvements underway it is unlikely the agreement will have any value to us in the future. ENCLOSED: Copy of original assessment agreement to be rescinded. NOTE: Bill Hawkins will be providing procedural information at the meeting. .' \ ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: " ) ", I ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT and ASSESSOR'S CERTIFICATION By and among THE CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA, \ ANDOVER LIMITED PARTNERSInP and COUNTY ASSESSOR OF THE COUNTY OF ANOKA This Document was drafted by: HOLMES &: GRAVEN, Chartered 470 Pillsbury Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 ':) ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT / THIS AGREEMENT, made on or as of the day of , _' and among The City of Andover, Minnesota, a municipal corporation (the "City"), Andover Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership (the "Redeveloper"), and the County Assessor of the County of Anoka (the "Assessor"). WITNESSETH, that WHEREAS, on or before the date hereof the City and Redeveloper have entered into a Contract for Private Redevelopment (the "Redevelopment Contract") regarding certain real property located in the City of Andover, pursuant to which the City is to acquire certain property, hereinafter referred to as the "Redevelopment Property" and legally described in Exhibit A hereto and convey said Redevelopment Property to the Redeveloper; and WHEREAS, it is contemplated that pursuant to said Redevelopment Contract the Redeveloper will construct an approximately 105,000 square foot shopping mall upon the Redevelopment Property (the "Minimum Improvements"); and WHEREAS, the City and Redeveloper desire to establish a minimum market value for said Redevelopment Property and the Minimum Improvements tp be constructed thereon, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76, Subdivision 8; and ~) / WHEREAS, the City and the Assessor have reviewed the construction plans and specifications for the Minimum Improvements which it is contemplated will be erected; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to this Agreement, in consideration of the promises, covenants and agreements made by each to the other, do hereby agree as follows: . 1. The minimum market value which shall be assessed for the Redevelopment Property described in Exhibit A, for ad valorem tax purposes, shall be the percentage completed of the Minimum Improvements on the January 1 following the start of construction, based on a market value for the Minimum Improvements of $2,626,535, and $3,600,000, representing the completed market value of the Minimum Improvements, each January 1 thereafter. The City shall certify to the Assessor the date construction begins and the percentage completed before such January 1. 2. The minimum market value herein established shall be of no further force and effect and this Agreement shall terminate on the date when the tax increment bonds issued by the City and referred to in the Redevelopment Contract as the Bonds have been paid in full and retired. The events referred to in Sections 2(a) and 2(b) of this Agreement shall be evidenced by a certificate or affidavit executed by the City. ') C-l ", " 3. This Agreement shall be promptly recorded by the Redeveloper with a copy of Minnesota Statutes, Section 213.16, Subdivision 8, set forth in Exhibit B hereto. The Redeveloper shall pay all costs of recording. 4. Neither the preambles nor provisions of this Agreement are intended to, nor shall they be construed as, modifying the terms of the Redevelopment Contract between the City and the Redeveloper. 5. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties. 6. Each of the parties has authority to enter into this Agreement and to take all actions required of it, and has taken all actions necessary to authorize the execution and delivery of this Agreement. 1. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid and unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision hereof. ') / 8. The parties hereto agree that they will, from time to time, execute, acknowledge and deliver, or cause to be executed, acknowledged and delivered, such supplements, amendments and modifications hereto, and such further instruments as may reasonably be required for correcting any inadequate, or incorrect, or amended description of the Redevelopment Property or the Minimum Improvements, or for carrying out the expressed intention of this Agreement, inclUding, without limitation, any further instruments required to delete from the description of the Redevelopment Property such part or parts as may be included within a separate assessment agreement. 9. Except as provided in Section 8 of this Agreement, this Agreement may not be amended nor any of its terms modified except by a writing authorized and executed by all parties hereto. 10. This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 11. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. THE CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA By '1- ~:. /' ,--V Its _ ~~_./ B~u ~.~~ ) C-2 (su6!S dwng paads ~ SapE~!~~Eg III adAili) 000'1$ OOZ'E$ .' (0 x!puaddv) ~SO;) pa~-em!~s:;I a6EU6!s {PES 08$ x OV sdwng paads t' ., .. '~UO;) 'uolssn~s10 ~l}}-e~ili a~-e~~aili pu-elpOOM .~ ma~I Item 14. Approve Driveway Access Agreement/95-8 " staff requests that the City Council table this item for further review by staff. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.. ~~ 1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1Jj11~~::::'. ............................. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~::::::. . ............. ........... :::::::.. .... .' - .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: ~~~~i~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 111111111111111j1111111j1j1j1j1j1j1j1j1j1j1j1j1j1j1j1j1j1j1j1j1j1~1~1~1~1~1~1j ~~~~~.~~~~~............................ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~ .............................................................................. ~~~1~111~~~1~1~1~1~~~111~1111111111~1~1~~~~~~~~~~1~1~1~~~1~~~1~~111~~1~1~~:::: ...................................................................... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~::::.. ........................................................... F'" :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.. ................ .............. ~~~~~~::::.. :.. August 1995 Population and Household Estimates April 1, 1994 for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area ~ Metropolitan Council " . '. " :~ . MetropoUtail Counell . Mears Park Centre. . 230 East Fifth Street .. , St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1634 . . ESTIMATING POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLDS IN THE lWIN CUlES AREA The Metropolitan Council has prepared annual population and household estimates for the municipalities in the seven-county metropolitan area for over two decades. These estimates are used for a variety of purposes by state and local governments and the private sector. The following is a brief explanation of the Council's responsibility for producing the estimates and the process used to complete them. Estimates Are a State Requirement In 1971, the Minnesota Legislature passed the Metropolitan Revenue Distribution Act (fiscal disparities) mandating that the Council annually estimate the number of persons and households for each municipality in the seven-county metropolitan area. The State Demographer's Office was designated as the agency to produce estimates for cities and townships in all other Minnesota counties. The intent of the legislation was to provide the State Department of Revenue with annual municipal-level estimates for calculating local aids and fiscal disparities. The Council recently submitted numbers for April 1, 1994; the April date is used because it corresponds to the date of the decennial census. The formulas for calculating local aids can change from year to year, also changing the impact of the estimates on this process. The Census Provides a Starting Point The Council's yearly work on the estimates begins with the detailed housing and population data from the most recent decennial census. The estimates are calculated using a "housing unit" method supplemented with Council data, such as surveys of mobile home parks and group quarters facilities. A housing unit method is used because the detailed residential construction data that is fundamental to this type of method is annually supplied to the Council by communities in the region. Vacancy assumptions are applied to calculate the number of occupied housing units (households). An estimated persons per household rate for different types of units, along with the number of persons living in group quarters, is then used in estimating the population. Council Numbers Have Many Uses In addition to the legislatively mandated uses of the estimates, they are also used for a number of research and planning purposes. The Council uses the estimates to monitor its own forecasts. Funding for recycling plans and residential sewer flow calculations are based on the estimates. In areas where services-such as police and fire protection-are shared by several municipalities, the estimates are-used to determine costs per resident. The Council's Office of Research regularly distributes the estimates to private businesses, developers, consultants, government agencies, the media, academic institutions and others. For more information about the estimates contact Kathy Johnson at 291-6332. (. - / Publication no. 74-95-058 APRlL 1, 1994 POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD ESTIMATES ANOKA ~~ff~W~~ COUNTY April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 Census Estimate Census Estimate Census Estimate Andover 15,216 19,465 4,430 5,917 3.43 3.28 Anoka 17,192 17,509 6,394 6,681 2.57 2_50 Bethel 394 429 130 142 3.03 3.02 Blaine (Pt) 38,975 41,658 12,825 13,802 3.04 3.02 Bums Twp. 2,401 2,903 754 925 3.18 3.14 Centerville 1,633 2,101 519 688 3.15 3.05 Circle Pines 4,704 4,695 1,562 1,603 3.01 2.93 Columbia Heights 18.910 18,882 7,766 7.824 2.42 2.39 Columbus Twp. 3,690 4,021 1,129 1,242 3.27 3.24 Coon Rapids 52,978 58,991 17.449 20.337 3.01 2.89 East Bethel 8.050 8.702 2,542 2,823 3.17 3.08 Fridley 28,335 28.104 10.909 10,972 2.58 2.54 Ham Lake 8,924 9,825 2,720 3,048 3.28 3.22 Hilltop 749 774 410 413 1.83 1.87 Lexington 2,279 2,234 829 832 2.75 2.69 LinoLakes 8,807 12,266 2,603 3,671 3.25 3.17 Linwood Twp. 3,588 3,926 1,146 1,295 3.13 3.03 Oak Grove 5,488 5,997 1,638 1,866 3.35 3.21 Ramsey 12,408 14,907 3,620 4,505 3.43 3.31 St Francis 2,538 2,796 760 865 3.24 3.14 Spring Lake Park (Pt) 6,429 6.528 2,302 2,411 2.79 2.71 COUNTY TOTAL 243.688 266.713 82.437 91,862 2.93 2.88 CARVER COUNTY Benton Twp. Camden Twp. Carver Ch~nh~.~ (Pt) Chaska Chaska Twp. Cologne Dahlgren Twp. Hamburg Hancock Twp. Hollywood Twp. Laketown Twp. Mayer New Germany Norwood San Francisco Twp. Victoria Waconia Waconia Twp. Watertown Watertown Twp. Young America Young America Twp. COUNTY TOTAL PPIlIICAllV.EST APRIL 1, 1994 POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD ESTIMATES April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 Census Estimate 895 925 910 951 744 760 ll,732 14,316 ll,339 13,721 174 180 563 583 1,296 1,373 492 502 364 381 1,060 1,100 2,232 2,285 471 510 353 368 1,351 1,367 773 888 2,354 2,926 3,498 4,147 1,287 1,359 2,408 2,517 1,349 1,415 1,354 1,535 916 916 47,915 55,025 April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 Census Estimate 276 293 287 308 262 282 4,016 4,829 4,212 5,1I6 60 64 216 230 394 429 184 193 1I0 1I7 327 349 601 642 166 183 138 147 515 534 244 287 756 981 1,401 1,727 407 432 848 910 439 464 457 541 285 294 16,601 19,352 , . ".. ....-........".'.....'........-"-..,.,.,.....--. -" ......--.-.--,----.,-.~c---...,..,...,.,.,..,..... .....-....,-.....,.,-......_.....-,...,'._.,-.._....'........... ... ..........'.. //...PERSONSPER (........i.. -.......-.---...--.-,-.............,......... .",............. ..-..-...--..,...,......,,-....,...,..-.-,-...,..............'.-....----................ tuousmow ...... .i i April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 Census Estimate 3.24 3.16 3.17 3.09 2.84 2.70 2.92 2.96 2.67 2.67 2.90 2.81 2.61 2.53 3.29 3.20 2.67 2.60 3.31 3.26 3.24 3.15 3.16 3.11 2.84 2.79 2.56 2.50 2.62 2.56 3.17 3.09 2.97 2.87 2.40 2.32 3.16 3.15 2.74 2.67 3.07 3.05 2.96 2.84 3.21 3.12 2.84 2.81 APRIL I, 1994 POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD ESTIMATES LEO, ;.................................. ..... M~~;~6g DAKOTA ..< II ~..,.' ...-. COUNTY April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 Census Estimate Census Estimate Census Estimate Apple Valley 34,598 39,188 11,145 12.981 3.09 3.00 Bumsville 51,288 54,525 19,127 20,592 2.67 2.64 Castle Rock Twp. 1,480 1,537 460 481 3.22 3.20 Coates 186 182 66 66 2.82 2.76 Douglas Twp. 670 723 192 212 3.49 3.41 Eagan 47,409 54.957 17,427 20,298 2.72 2.70 Empire Twp. 1,340 1,412 426 452 3.15 3.12 Eureka Twp. 1,405 1,502 447 485 3.14 3.10 Farmington 5,940 6,870 2,064 2,390 2.85 2.85 Greenvale Twp. 685 634 228 212 3.00 2.99 Hampton 363 388 118 128 3.08 3.03 Hampton Twp. 866 891 260 275 3.33 3.24 Hastings (Pt) 15,473 16,195 5,401 5,807 2.76 2.69 Inver Grove Heights 22,477 25,243 7,803 8,814 2.85 2.84 Lakeville 24,854 32,978 7.851 10,401 3.17 3.17 Lilydale 553 499 297 288 1.86 1.73 Marshan Twp. 1,215 1,332 373 394 3.26 3.38 Mendota 164 160 69 70 2.38 2.29 Mendota Heights 9,381 10,636 3,302 3,889 2.85 2.73 Miesville 135 134 47 48 2.87 2.79 New Trier 96 97 29 30 3.31 3.23 Nininger Twp. 805 843 241 256 3.34 3.29 Northfield (Pt) 170 285 54 90 3.15 3.17 Randolph 331 343 111 117 2.98 2.93 Randolph Twp. 448 494 158 175 2.84 2.82 Ravenna Twp. 1,926 2.152 546 634 3.53 3.39 Rosemount 8,622 11,086 2,779 3,551 3.10 3.12 Sciota Twp. 252 273 86 95 2.93 2.87 South St Paul 20,197 20,396 7,914 8,015 2.53 2.53 Sunfish Lake - 413 458 138 157 2.99 2.92 Vermillion 510 501 157 158 3.25 3.17 Vermillion Twp. 1,201 1,257 354 380 3.39 3.31 Waterford Twp. 485 499 182 191 2.66 2.61 West St Paul 19,248 19,332 8,441 8,528 2.24 2.23 COUNfYTOTAL 275,186 308,002 98,293 110.660 2.78 2.77 HENNEPIN COUNTY Bloomington Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Champlin Chanh.~""U (Pt) Corcoran Crystal Dayton (Pt) Deephaven Eden Prairie Edina Excelsior Fort Snelling unorg. Golden Valley Greenfield Greenwood Hanover (Pt) Hassan Hopkins Independence Long Lake Loretta Maple Grove Maple Plain Medicine Lake Medina Minneapolis Minnetonka Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista Mound New Hope Orono Osseo Plymouth Richfield Robbinsdale Rockford (Pt) Rogers Sl Anthony (Pt) Sl Bonifacius Sl Louis Park Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Wayzata Woodland COUNTY TOTAL APRIL 1, 1994 POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD ESTIMATES ,.:.:.':.....,.. '. ','. ".. ..1.... '. ':<:".:':'::::: ''''::' '. .."." , A ~.lULA TTnN" .... .'. .. .... " ...................' ...................................~~r~~~'...........:.................. April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 Census Estimate Census Estimate Census Estimate 86,335 28,887 56,381 16.849 o 5,199 23,788 4,392 3,653 39,311 46,070 2,367 97 20,971 1.450 614 269 1,951 16.534 2,822 1.984 404 38,736 2,005 385 3.096 368,383 48,370 573 3,439 9,634 21,853 7,285 2,704 50,889 35,710 14,396 440 698 5,278 1.180 43,787 5,917 1,571 1.472 3,806 496 1,032,431 86,683 28,484 58.471 19,030 o 5.508 23,703 4.883 3,621 44,189 46,841 2,367 97 20,947 1.572 664 340 2,326 16,536 2,952 1,951 494 43.542 2,094 373 3,628 366,480 50,569 578 3,758 9.592 21,651 7444 2,594 57,391 35,261 14,255 449 978 5,374 1,192 43,641 6,613 1,755 1,460 3.860 482 1.056.673 34,488 11,226 20,386 5,423 o 1,545 9,272 1,359 1.324 14,447 19,860 1,160 7 8,273 457 250 82 585 7,973 925 747 167 12.531 696 169 1007 160.682 18,687 204 1,195 3,710 8,507 2,613 995 18.361 15,551 6,008 163 259 2,208 398 19.925 2,026 741 577 1,715 176 419.060 35,220 11,133 21.528 6,239 o 1686 9360 I.5SO 1,339 16,175 20,632 1,155 7 8,315 513 271 105 710 7.920 995 759 202 14,341 745 169 1,182 160,453 19,962 208 1~314 3,755 8.528 2.682 974 20,856 15,491 6,066 170 357 2,351 412 20,008 2,298 843 592 1,765 172 431.508 2.47 2.56 2.76 3.11 0.00 3.37 2.55 3.23 2.74 2.71 2.30 2.00 3.00 2.45 3.17 2.46 3.28 3.34 2.04 3.04 2.59 2.42 3.09 2.79 2.28 3.07 2.19 2.56 2.81 2.88 2.60 2.44 2.79 2.46 2.72 2.29 2.34 2.70 2.69 2.39 2.96 2.16 2.92 1.85 2.55 2.22 2.82 2.41 2.43 2.55 2.71 3.05 0.00 3.27 2.51 3.15 2.69 2.72 2.25 2.00 3.00 2.44 3.06 2.45 3.24 3.28 2.05 2.96 2.51 2.45 3.04 2.71 2.21 3.07 2.18 2.52 2.78 2.86 2.55 2.41 2.78 2.40 2.71 2.27 2.30 2.64 2.74 2.29 2.89 2.14 2.88 1.83 2.47 2.19 2.80 2.39 RAMSEY COUNTY Arden Hills Blaine (Pt) Falcon Heights Gem Lake Lauderdale Little Canada Maplewood Mounds View New Brighton North Oaks North Sl Paul Roseville Sl Anthony (Pt) Sl Paul Shoreview Spring Lake Parle (Pt) Vadnais Heights White Bear Twp. White Bear Lake (Pt) PPHIIIlAMS.EST I APRIL 1, 1994 POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD ESTIMATES April 1, 1990. April 1, 1994 Census Estimate 9,199 9,426 0 0 5,380 5;2.97 439 449 2,700 2,718 8,971 9;2.25 30,954 32,903 12.541 12,552 22;2.07 22,328 3,386 3,644 12,376 12,809 33,485 33,674 2,449 2,565 272;2.35 271,660 24,587 25,957 103 100 11,041 11.968 9,424 10,236 24,306 25,398 485,783 492,909 April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 Census Estimate 2,904 2,944 0 0 2,016 2,057 140 144 1,166 1,180 3,902 4,091 11,496 12,473 4,702 4,770 8,523 8,815 1,085 1,199 4,447 4,650 13,562 13,996 1;2.45 1,311 110,249 110,347 8,991 9,703 41 41 3,924 4,321 3,205 3,593 8,902 9,403 190,500 195,038 ... ".-......-....-.--.......'..-.............. , . ..'...'....-..-..,..- ..-.,....,.....,.....--.....-_.....,..-,..__... ..-.-...-----.-----............. ----...--....... ._,_......."., .. .. ..PERSONS PER . .... . .... ..............>..nOUSEHOLD// April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 Census Estimate 2.81 2.75 0.00 0.00 2.45 2.39 3.06 3.04 2.32 2.30 2.30 2.25 2.62 2.57 2.67 2.63 2.57 2.49 3.06 2.97 2.78 2.75 2.37 2.31 1.85 1.84 2.37 2.37 2.73 2.67 2.51 2.44 2.81 2.77 2.94 2.85 2.71 2.68 2.47 2.45 '. APRIL 1, 1994 POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD ESTIMATES I........ :;q~. .......... ..i. ............i .......................PERSONSPEiim.. scon l:tQPSEHQ't.J}I .... ....: COUNTY April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 Census Estimate Census Estimate Census Estimate Belle Plaine 3.149 3,240 1,092 1,169 2.72 2.62 Belle Plaine Twp. 691 725 211 229 3.27 3.17 Blakeley Twp. 456 465 140 146 3.26 3.18 Cedar Lake Twp. 1,688 1,945 523 609 3.23 3.19 Credit River Twp. 2,854 3,490 864 1,065 3.30 3.28 Elko 223 256 75 88 2.97 2.91 Helena Twp. 1.107 1,235 352 406 3.14 3.04 Jackson Twp. 1,359 1,450 459 497 2.96 2.92 Jordan 2,909 2,982 1,042 1,089 2.79 2.74 Louisville Twp. 910 989 278 302 3.27 3.27 New Marlcet 227 225 82 82 2.77 2.74 New Marlcet Twp. 2.008 2,400 627 756 3.20 3.17 New Prague (Pt) 2,356 2.566 870 961 2.57 2.55 Prior Lake 11,482 12,559 3,901 4,300 2.94 2.92 Sl Lawrence Twp. 418 485 122 144 3.43 3.37 Sand Creek Twp. 1,511 1,557 412 444 3.28 3.20 Savage 9,906 13,703 3,255 4,551 3.04 3.01 Shakopee 11,739 13,041 4,163 4,708 2.74 2.71 Spring Lake Twp. 2,853 3,272 899 1,040 3.17 3.15 COUNTY TOTAL 57.846 66,585 19,367 22,586 2.95 2.92 " APRil.. 1, 1994 POPULATION AND. HOUSEHOLD ESTIMATES i........./<.. . ..... .sz22si\" /................~h--. (PERSONS PER. i/ ................. ii. WASHINGTON ........... ~, Ii "nul /HOUSEHOLD. . COUNTY April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 April 1, 1990 April 1, 1994 Census Estimate Census Estimate Census Estimate Afton 2.645 2,816 890 977 2.97 2.88 Bayport 3,200 3,225 743 786 2.33 2.25 Baytown Twp. 939 1,114 302 369 3.11 3.02 Birchwood 1,042 1,031 364 362 2.86 2.85 Cottage Grove 22.935 26,675 6,856 8,313 3.35 3.22 Dellwood 887 885 301 309 2.95 2.86 Denmark Twp. 1,172 1,273 367 410 3.19 3.10 Forest Lake 5,833 6,397 2,292 2,551 2.48 2.46 Forest Lake Twp. 6,690 7,048 2,132 2,289 3.14 3.07 Grant Twp. 3.778 4,009 1,173 1,283 3.20 3.11 Grey Cloud Island Twp. 414 404 165 165 2.51 2.45 Hastings (Pt) 5 5 2 2 2.50 2.50 Hugo 4,417 5,208 1,416 1,712 3.12 3.04 Lake Elmo 5,903 6,072 1,973 2,084 2.97 2.89 Lakeland 2.000 1,994 645 662 3.10 3.01 Lakeland Shores 291 330 101 117 2.88 2.82 Lake St Croix Beach 1,078 1,120 415 445 2.60 2.52 Landfall 685 622 300 273 2.27 2.26 Mahtomedi 5,633 6,353 1,874 2.126 3.00 2.99 Marine on St Croix 602 609 234 238 2.57 2.56 May Twp. 2,535 2,688 820 894 3.09 3.01 Newport 3,720 3,720 1,323 1,354 2.81 2.75 New Scandia Twp. 3,197 3,443 1,060 1,148 3.02 3.00 Oakdale 18,374 22,933 6,699 8,575 2.74 2.67 Oak Park Heights 3,486 3,721 1,322 1,427 2.35 2.33 Pine Springs 436 434 135 135 3.23 3.21 St Mary's Point 339 372 126 139 2.69 2.68 St Paul Park 4,965 5,032 1.749 1,830 2.83 2.75 Stillwater 13,882 15,350 4,982 5,582 2.71 2.66 - Stillwater Twp. 2,066 2,452 639 763 3.23 3.21 West Lakeland Twp. 1,736 2,362 524 731 3.31 3.23 White Bear Lake (pt) 336 406 168 169 2.00 2.40 Willemie 584 570 227 228 2.57 2.50 Woodbwy 20,075 28,627 6,927 9,925 2.86 2.86 COUNTY TOTAL 145,880 169,300 49.246 58,373 2.91 2.85 METRO AREA TOTAL 2.288,729 2,415.207 875.504 929,379 2.56 2.55 'frj\';:'-'''''''''''''''''''' ",,1 '~}. eLl ~';;" ~~ \;\ ;l ~ :'\ .J. 1.1 -;,;~-~ ~:-;; ~"", ......... "".~,...~t't:''-'' CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 · (612) 755-5100 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council COPIES TO: City Departments FROM: n",,; n II 1 mqrpn DATE: September 7, 1995 REFERENCE: AUGUST 1995 Building Department Report I hereby submit the following report of the Building Department for the Month of August 1995: BUILDING PERMITS 35 Residential (28 Sewer/7 Septic) 5 Additions 7 Garages 2 Remodeling/Finishing 2 Pole Buildings/Barns 2 Sheds 1 Swimming Pool 6 Chimneys/stoves/Fireplaces 1 Structural Changes 36 Porches/Decks 7 Re-Roofs APPROXIMATE VALUATION $ 3,811,000.00 119,000.00 52,800.00 132,000.00 21,432.00 3,100.00 3,200.00 10,600.00 500.00 113,763.00 15,300.00 4,282,695.00 FEES COLLECTED 47,082.12 75.60 1,501.81 305.00 700.00 10,841. 70 295.00 51.00 245.00 105.00 1,350.00 148.00 325.00 160.00 20.00 420.00 238.00 120.00 63,983.23 PERMITS 104 Building Permits 1 Renewal Permits 43 Heating Permits 14 Heating Repair 28 Hook Up (sewer) 45 plumbing Permit 19 Plumbing Repair 17 Pumping Permits 7 Septic Permits 3 Septic Repair 27 Water Meter 37 Certificates of Occupancy 13 Contractor's License 32 License Verification Fee 4 Health Authority Form 28 Sewer Administration Fee 28 SAC Retainage Fee 4 Reinspection Fee AUGUST 1995 Report September 7, 1995 Page Two Total Number of Houses YTD (1995) - 210 Total Number of Houses YTD (1994) - 290 Total Va1uation--August 1995 - $ 4,282,695.00 Total Va1uation--YTD 1995 - $49,162,192.00 Total Building Department Income--August 1995 - $63,983.23 Total Building Department Income--YTD 1995 - 418,134.19 DA/jp PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION (3 year terms) CHAIRMAN Tom Anderson 1269 - 148th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 H-434-8941 Term Expires 12/31/97 " " COMMISSIONERS PACKETS: AGENDA TODD HAAS FRANK STONE JEFF KIEFFER TOM ANDERSON PARKS SUPERVISOR ROGER PAULSON DAVID O'TOOLE DAVID ERICKSON JIM LINDAHL AL GRABOWSKI RECORDING SECRETARY NANCY KNOP Jeff Kieffer 3975 - 149th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 H-427-4668 W-397-6684 Fax *341-7750 Term Expires 12/31/97 Jim Lindahl (Acting Chair) 17275 Tulip St. NW Andover, MN 55304 H-753-3449 Term Expires 12/31/95 Roger Paulson 13336 Gladiola St. NW Andover, MN 55304 H-757-9714 3 Term Expires 12/31/95 David O'Toole 13429 Jonquil St. NW Andover, MN 55304 H-427-5976 Term Expires 12/31/96 David Erickson 745 - 140th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 H-757-8461 W-643-3006 Term Expires 12/31/96 Al Grabowski 1266 - 146th Lane NW Andover, mN 55304 H- w-574-8110 Term Expires 12/31/97 RECORDING SECRETARY Marcie Peach 15830 university Avenue NW Andover, MN 55433 H-434-9358 * Todd Haas H-754-1009 (Revised 9-8-95) parkboardaddresslisting (Rhonda) 0L ~~lq-q6 CITY HALL. 2015 FIRST AVE. NO. . ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303-2270 PHONE (612) 421-6630 . FAX (612) 421-9194 . TTY (612) 422-0442 Office of the Mayor August 30, 1995 Dear City Official: I wish to extend a cordial invitation to attend the League of Minnesota Cities regional meeting hosted by the City of Anoka on Thursday, September 28, 1995, at Greenhaven Country Club (map enclosed). The afternoon program will begin at 2:00 p.m. and cover a variety of subjects. These discussions will include subjects of an important nature, both locally and statewide. The Regional Meeting program is enclosed. There will be adequate time in the afternoon program for open discussion of local issues -- bring your questions or concerns to the meeting for discussion. The afternoon program will conclude by 5:00 p.m., followed by a social hour. Dinner will be served at 6:00 p.m. Following a welcome to our city, LMC President Karen Anderson will address the audience regarding the organization's focus for the coming year. After the president's message, the League will present its new video on dealing with difficult personnel situations, followed by a discussion on personnel issues. To make reservations for your city, please return the enclosed registration form as soon as possible. In case of cancellations, please notify Deb Young or Jessica Morgan at Anoka City Hall at 421-6630 by Monday, September 25th. Unless registrations are canceled, it will be necessary to bill your city for those who did not attend and did not cancel. If anyone from your city needs special accommodations or has special dietary needs, please advise us so special arrangements can be made. I look forward to seeing you on Thursday, September 28th! On behalf of the Anoka City Council, p~-t. ~ rkPx Peter M. Beberg i Host Mayor Enclosures (dyllmc-invitation) - AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER - .g. 0..- Q)U ~ c -E~ Q) ~ ~ 0 e,:)U "00 CIS"'" 0"0 IY~ ~IY > e:: CIS Q) .I: > e:: CIS Q).I: Q) e:: .... Q) (!)~ ".E(!) Oae:: -.......0 >- >'.I: Q) ClSCIS-e(/) ~;:og OJ.I: e:: .I: .- .2> 0 .0 J:I(!):J E Q) . 13 o~~Q) a.. CIS X.I: LLI-Q)..... .' . CIS a CIS ~"""'Q) e:: >. ~ <{~~Q) .I: C) .I: ..I: C)~ ..... :J._ X 0 OI Q)..... .... .I:Q)"O"O ""'~CISCIS .I: CIS 00 -e1-c:::1Y o . e:: e:: "Z(;)Q)Q) ~ffi:2~~ .......>..c::.I: >- >. 0 e:: e:: ;CIS.......~~ .c::-=>.........Q) OJ..c CIS (!) (!) (/) :.;: . C);: 0 e:: g .....I.I:.....O.... C)..... ...... E Q).- (/) ..... .0 o~IQ)~:J a.. CIS 0 > .;:: 13 LLI-.....> ;r .. City of Anoka. Thursday, September 28., 1995 We will have city officials attending the regional meeting in Anoka and we agree to pay for these meals unless the City of Anoka is notified of any changes by Monday, September 25, 1995. NAMES/TITLES OF PERSONS ATTENDING: (please furnish names of people attending so that name tags can be prepared) PERSON MAKING RESERVATlON(S): CITY: PHONE: ( ) * Number of attendees x $10.00 registration fee Number of attendees x $15.00 dinner TOTAL PAYMENT ENCLOSED $ Please make checks payable to CITY OF ANOKA and return with registration form to: Deb Young CITY OF ANOKA 2015 First Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 * $10.00 registration fee applies only to the fIrst ten registrants. There is no charge for more than ten registrations from one city. WANT TO GOLF NINE HOLES BEFORE THE DAY BEGINS? ... Call Jon Bendix, 427-3180, at the Greenhaven Golf Course if you are interested. Let him, or anyone on his staff, know you're with the LMC group so they can set you up with other LMC players. League of Minnesota Cities 2:00-2:30 p.m. 2:30-3:00 p.m. 3:00-3:15 p.m. 3:15- 3:35 p.m. 3:35-4:00 p.m. 4:00-5:00 p.m. 5:00-6:00 p.m. 6:00-7:00 p.m. 7:00-7:15 p.m. 7:15-7:30 p.m. 7:30-7:45 p.m. 7:45-8:30 p.m. 8:30-9:00 p.m. 9:00 p.m. 3490 Lexington Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55126-8044 1995 REGIONAL MEETING PROGRAM AFTERNOON PROGRAM LMC Information Systems Updateffelecommunications Barb Gallo, LMC's Director of Technology Services Liability Issues Involving Contracts LMCIT Staff Break Legislative Issues at the Upcoming Session IGR Staff Tobacco and Smoke Free Communities for Children Minnesota Department of Health Staff Discussion by cities attending of City Achievements Moderator: Tom Thelen, LMC Field Representative Social Hour Dinner EVENING PROGRAM Introduction by Jim Miller, LMC Executive Director Welcome by Host City Mayor Presentation of LMC's Strategic Plan (LMC 2000: Service and Leadership) Karen Anderson, Mayor, Minnetonka President, League of Minnesota Cities A video dealing with difficult personnel situations Roundtable discussions of difficult personnel situations Response to roundtable discussions questions Adjourn AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER (612)490-5600 1-800-925-1122 Fax(612.49QcOO72 TDD (612) 490-9038 3490 Lexington Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55126-8044 League of Minnesota Cities 1995 REGIONAL MEETING SCHEDULE DATE CITY LOCA TION/CONT ACT PERSON September 26 ELY Kennedy Cafeteria Facilities 600 E Harvey Street Ely, MN 55731 Patricia Wellvang 218/365-3224 September 27 AITKIN American Legion Club 20 First Avenue NW Aitkin, MN 56431 Ross Wagner 218/927-2527 September 28 ANOKA Greenhaven Country Club 2800 Greenhaven Drive Anoka, MN 55303 Mark Nagel 612/421-6630 October 3 GREEN BUSH Greenbush Community Center 244 Main Street North Box 98 Greenbush, MN 56726 WyAnn Janousek 218/782-2570 October 4 MC INTOSH Centennial Community Center 115 Broadway NW Mcintosh, MN 56556 Ann Lohse 218/563-3043 October 5 HENNING Henning Public SchooUCommunity Room Henning Community Center/Evening 607 2nd Street Henning, MN 56551 Wilma Morse/Sarah Ebeling 218/583-2402 (OVER) AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 12) 490-5600 1-800-925-1122 TDD (612) 490-9038 Fax(612)490-00~2 PAGE 2 . . 1995 REGIONAL MEETING SCHEDULE DATE CITY LOCATION/CONTACT PERSON October 17 STEWARTVILLE Stewartville Civic Center Intersections of Highway 63 & Highway 30 Stewartville, MN 55976 Cheryl Roeder 507/533-4745 October 18 OWATONNA Ramada Inn 1212 North Interstate 35 Owatonna, MN 55060 Jim Moeckly 507/451-4540 October 19 WINTHROP Community Center 305 North Main Street Winthrop, MN 55396 Samuel Shult 507/647-5306 October 24 FAIRMONT Holiday Inn-Fairmont Junction 1-90 & Highway 15 Fairmont, MN 56031 David Schornack 507/238-9461 October 25 WILLMAR Holiday Inn 2104 E Highway 12 Willmar, MN 56201 Kevin Halliday 612/235-4913 October 26 PIPESTONE Pipestone Country Club 1003 8th Avenue SE Pipestone, MN 56164 Joan Lange 507/825-3324 r at q-tQ-q5 ~ ~ TKDA TOLTZ. KINO, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNl::RS 1500 PlPERJAFFRAYPLAZA _ CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUl., MINNESOTA55101-2140 PHONE:e1 =2-4400 FAX:e121202-0083 September 6,1995 Honorable Mayor and City Council i\ndover,~esota Re: Engineering Matters Regular Council Meeting i\ndover, ~esota Commission No. 9140-959 Dear Council Members: The following are engineering matters discussed and action taken at the regular Council meeting held September 5,1995. 1. Consent Agenda The Council by single motion approved engineering related items as follows: A. Proj. 95-19 . 13748 Round Lake Boulevard Assessment for water service connection. 2. Proj. 94-33 - Commercial Boulevard Extension Thrush Street to Nightengale Street Mr. Davidson did present the Feasibility Report dated 7/27/95. Generally the property owners affected are opposed to the assessments. Council Action: The Council by resolution directed that Commercial Boulevard (only) be constructed as Phase ill improvements. The Engineer is directed to prepare plans and specifications and a supplemental feasibility report. 3. Proj. 93-5 - Winslow Hills - 3rd Addition, Comm. No. 10365. Mr. Winslow Holasek did appear to present the following: a. A letter from the City Attorney indicated a deficiency in the "N oticc of Hearing" , related to the time of mailing of notices. b. A packet of documents was furnished to Council Members. Transparencies of storm sewer areas previously assessed were shown. c. i\ny future public hearing would be waived in return for Council reconsideration of storm sewer assessments. d. Mr. Holasek requested that the storm sewer assessment of 4 cents/S.F. be reduced to 2 centslS.F. Council Action: The Council suggested that an independent third party be hired to audit previous assessments for storm water facilities in the watershed and the cost shared 50%/50% by the City and Mr. Holasek. The audit would then determine if the assessment is justified. Mr. Holasek would be required to waive all rights of appeal to the imdings of the audit. The Council meeting was adjourned at approximately 12.30 A.M. 9/6195. JLD/mha DATE: September 19, 1995 ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL City Council Minutes - September 5, 1995 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes - September 7, 1995 Letter from Peter Beberg, City of Anoka - August 30, 1995 Letter from John Davidson, TKDA - September 6, 1995 August 1995 Building Dept. Report - September 7, 1995 Park and Recreation Commission Listing Ordinance No. 111 TIF Bond Sale Item Information Livable Communities Act Item Information Schedule of Bills PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT AGENDA. THANK YOU. CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANORA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANC~ NO. 111 AN ORDINANCE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LAWN REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: Section 1. Purpose. To provide protection to all natural terrain features of the residential site, which if preserved as required herein, will add to the attractiveness and stability of the site. Standards set forth in this ordinance will increase the desirability of residences, encourage investment or occupation in the city, optimize use and value of land and improvements, increase the stability and value of the property and add to the conditions affecting health and welfare of the city. Section 2. Definitions. TOp Soil: For the purpose of this Ordinance, top soil shall be defined as soil/dirt that has sufficient amounts of organic material to establish a suitable foundation for vegetative growth. Section 3. Top Soil Requirements. Top soil shall be inches of cover. and/or soqding. Section 4. 'Soil and/or Seed Requirements. spread so as to provide at least four (4) The site shall also be stabilized by seeding All boulevards are required to be sodded in areas served by municipal sanitary sewer and/or water. On grades or exposed areas which are not sodded, lawn grass seed shall be sown at not less than four (4) pounds to each one thousand (1,000) square feet of land area. The seed shall consist of a maximum of ten (10) percent rye grass by weight and a minimum of ninety (90) percent of permanent bluegrass and/or fescue grass by weight. All residential lots with municipal sanitary sewer and/or water shall be sodded or seeded from the boulevard edge to a distance of thirty (30) feet behind the principal residence on the lot. Wetlands shall be exempt from the sodding and seeding requirements as determined by the City, Department of Natural Resources, Watersheds, or Conservation District. The spreading of soil and seeding of lawn shall be completed within one year of the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. \ J Page Two , Turf Establishment Ordinance September 5, 1995 Section 5. Retroactive Clause. All properties in violation of th~ provisions of this Ordinance shall have one year to comply with the requirements set forth in this Ordinance. Section 6. Enforcement. The Code Enforcement Officer of the City of Andover shall enforce this Ordinance. Section 7. ~enalty. A violation of this Ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor as defined by State Law as amended. Section 8. Separability. Should any section, subdivision, clause or other prov~s~on of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any part other than the part so declared to be invalid. Adopted by the City Council this 5th day of September, 1995. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: c' 4-. )77C/ )(~ (I. E. McKelvey - Ma r ~1f4- Victona Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Seotember 19. 1995 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT t-n Approval of Claims Finance ITEM ~ Jean ~cGann t-n Schedule of Bills Finance Director APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: REQUEST The Andover City Council is requested to approve total Claims in the amount of $ 761,186.71. BACKGROUND Claims totaling $ 56,104.08 on disbursement edit list *1 dated 9/12/95 have been issued and released. Claims totaling $ 258,702.63 on disbursement edit list *2 dated 9/19/95 will be issued and released upon council approval. Claims totaling $ 446,380.00 for wire transfers will be sent 9/29/95 upon Council approval. AUTHORIZATION The schedules of bills payable as described above were reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 9/19/95 Approved By: MOTION BY: SECOND BY: