Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-26-249 C I T Y O F �NDOVEA 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda March 26, 2024 Andover City Hall Council Chambers Workshop Meeting - 6:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Discussion — Planning & Zoning Commission Training 3. Adjournment Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting - 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of Minutes — February 28, 2024 Regular Meeting 4. Public Hearing: Planned Unit Development — Andover Senior Campus — PID# 23-32-24- 32-0006 and 23-32-24-33-0002 (Applicant — JA Wedum Foundation) 5. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat — Andover Senior Campus - PID# 23-32-24-32-0006 and 23-32-24-33-0002 (Applicant — JA Wedum Foundation) 6. Other Business 7. Adjournment 9 LNNDOVE 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV TO: Planning and Zoning Commission Members COPY: Joe Janish, Community Development Director Jake Griffiths, Associate Planner FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner SUBJECT: Discussion: Planning and Zoning Commissioner Training DATE: March 26, 2024 DISCUSSION For informational purposes the following topics will be reviewed during the workshop: A. Planning and Zoning Procedures B. Open Meeting Law and Remote Meeting Participation Policy C. Meeting Cadence D. Other Topics/Questions Respectfully submitted, ;Peten geee" Peter Hellegers, City Planner C I T Y O F NNDOVE^ 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV Planning and Zoning Commission Procedures (Revised 2024) A. General Information 1. Role of the Planning and Zoning Commission The Planning and Zoning Commission serves as an advisory board to the City Council. The seven -member board makes recommendations to the City Council based on the city's Comprehensive Plan, City Code, and public input. The City Council makes all final decisions. A summary of the types of items reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission is shown in a subsequent section within this packet. 2. Procedures The Commission abides by the rules of parliamentary procedure known as "Roberts Rules". A brief overview is provided within this packet as well. Please keep in mind that the Commission does not follow Roberts Rules "by the book" and instead uses them as guardrails to help run an orderly and efficient meeting. A meeting cadence example is also provided within this packet to explain procedures within the meeting. 3. Meeting Dates and Times The Commission typically meets on the second Tuesday and sometimes on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Meetings are held in the City Council Chambers at City Hall. The meetings begin at 7:00 p.m. and typically last between one and three hours. On occasion there may be other meetings, such as workshops or open houses, that do not occur at the regular meeting time. 4. Length of Term Commissioners are appointed to serve three-year terms beginning in January. Members may reapply to serve consecutive terms. At the expiration of a term, Commissioners serve until the City Council fills their seat. 1 5. Staff Reports Staff reports will be prepared for each item on the agenda. The reports will include general information, applicable ordinances as well as information provided by the applicant. A packet including all the materials for each meeting will be delivered to Commissioner's homes on the Friday before the meeting by an Anoka County Sheriff's Department Community Service Officer. 6. Attendance If you are unable to attend a meeting, please contact a staff member in the Planning Department. This is important to ensure that a quorum (majority) of Commissioners will be present at each meeting. Three consecutive absences will result in automatic removal from the Commission. 7. Payment Commission members receive a small stipend per meeting that they attend. Payments are made quarterly. Commissioners are asked to fill out a W-4 form prior to receiving compensation. 8. Public Hearing Notification Process Approximately 10 days prior to the meeting: A Public Hearing Notice is mailed to all property owners within 350-feet of the site if it is urban, and 700-feet of the site if it is rural. This follows the requirements established by Minnesota State Statute for notification distances. A sign stating "Proposed Change" is placed on the site to inform interested residents of the public hearing. The sign has a phone number that residents can call for information on the public hearing. The public hearing notice is also published in the City of Andover's official newspaper which is the Anoka County Union Herald. This is also required by Minnesota State Statute. 9. Recusal From time to time a member of the Commission may have a conflict of interest in an application being reviewed, in these situations Commissioners may need to recuse themselves from the agenda item. Please contact City staff prior to the meeting if you feel you have a conflict of interest in a specific application. Please note that living in close proximity to an application alone is generally not a conflict of interest. 10. 60-Day Rule Commissioners should generally be aware of Minnesota State Statute 15.99, commonly referred to as the "60-day Rule", which requires a City to make a decision on all zoning applications within 60-days of the date of submittal, or 120-days if the City issues an extension. If a City fails to act on the request in that amount of time, the request is automatically approved. The underlying purpose of 2 the rule is to keep governmental agencies from taking too long in deciding land use issues. City staff monitor each application for compliance and will inform the Commission if its motion, especially motions to table, may conflict with the rule. B. Summary of Items Reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission The graphic below, the "pyramid of discretion", is provided as a way to visualize how much discretion the City has when considering different types of land use applications. Generally the City has the most discretion when creating law (the areas in green at the base of the pyramid), some discretion when they are acting in a quasi-judicial role of applying the law (yellow section in the middle of the pyramid), and the least discretion when acting in an administrative capacity. The Planning Commission does review some items where they are establishing laws, such as comprehensive plans amendments and rezonings. However, many of the items reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission will be from applying law and will require particular attention to the scope of what can be considered for that item under City Codes and State Statute. yA er � PQ Plan, Review � Variances f QQv Conditional 0� QUse Permits F Subdivision Applications Zoning/Subdivision �Q Ordinances L� Comprehensive Plan 3 1. Comprehensive Plan A "road map" for the community. This document establishes the vision and goals for the future of the community and City Code is required to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As the City of Andover is part of the seven -county metropolitan area, our Comprehensive Plan is required to be consistent with Metropolitan Council (Met Council) Policy Statements and guidance from the Met Council. This plan provides the foundation for all land use regulation in the city. Overall the information within a Comprehensive Plan follows three basic questions: a. What is the state of the community today? b. What should the community be in the future? c. How will the community get there? 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Most Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPA) involve changes to the Future Land Use Map. This map provides a land use designation for each property in the city. These designations regulate the types of activities that can occur on a property; such as residential, commercial, or industrial development. In other cases, a CPA may involve a change to the text of the plan to more accurately reflect changing times and conditions. Criteria for the review of these amendments are provided in Chapter One of the Comprehensive Plan. STATE LAW. All Comprehensive Plan Amendments require a 4/5ths vote of the City Council to be approved rather than a simple majority. Comprehensive Plan Amendments also must be approved by the Metropolitan Council. 3. Zoning Ordinance This is a tool to implement the comprehensive plan. Zoning is a method of establishing a land use pattern by regulating how land is used by owners/renters. Zoning ordinances include area standards (size, setbacks, height, etc.), various zoning districts (residential, commercial, industrial) with standards and allowed uses within those zoning districts. 4. Zoning (City Code) Amendment City Code amendments typically involve changes to the text of the City Code. These requests can be initiated by an applicant or the city. In many cases changes to existing regulations are made to 4 reflect changes in times and conditions or to address situations that have not previously been contemplated. 5. Rezoning A rezoning is a change (amendment) to the city's official zoning map. These change the zoning district of one or more properties. Zoning districts prescribe land uses that are allowed as well as dimensional standards for lot size, building setbacks and other items as detailed in Title 12 of the City Code. STATE LAW: When property is rezoned from residential to commercial or industrial, a two—thirds majority of all members of the city council is required. Other zoning changes only require a simple majority and rezoning should be consistent with the comprehensive plan land use map. (Applying Law) 6. Lot Split A Lot split is a division of one property into two properties. A survey, legal descriptions of the proposed properties and other information is required depending upon the circumstances surrounding the subject property. City Code Title 13, Chapter 1 provides the review procedure for lot splits. 7. Sketch Plan A sketch plan allows input from the Commission on a conceptual development proposal. The purpose is to allow a discussion between the Commission and applicant to help determine whether a concept has merit and what types of adjustments are needed before proceeding to a formal recommendation by the Commission. This is an inexpensive way to determine if what a person is asking for is viable. 8. Ghost Plat Typically this is a reference to a conceptual development layout for surrounding properties. It is used to show how the properties around a proposed development could develop, and the proposed development still leaves options for those property owners. 9. Preliminary Plat Preliminary plats involve the subdivision of one or more properties into more than two properties. These items are more complex than lot splits and require additional application materials including a grading plan, storm water management plat, geotechnical report and tree protection plan. City Code Title 11 provides the specific regulations for preliminary plats. w 10. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Conditional use permits (CUP's) are required for land uses that have the potential for adverse impacts on adjacent properties. CUP's allow the city to place reasonable conditions on the approval of a project to mitigate these impacts. In some cases, with sufficient findings, the Commission can recommend denial of a CUP if reasonable conditions are deemed not to be sufficient to adequately address adverse impacts on adjacent properties. The burden of proof is the applicant's responsibility. The criteria for considering conditional use permits are provided in City Code 12-15-7. Criteria for granting Conditional Use Permits (CUP)• a. In granting a Conditional Use Permit, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and: i. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. ii. Existing and anticipated traffic conditions, including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land. iii. The effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. 11. Interim Use Permit (IUP) The purpose and intent of an Interim Use Permit (IUP) is a temporary use of property until a particular date, until the occurrence of a particular event, or until zoning regulations no longer permit it. IUP's include uses such as mining, home occupations, interim performance standards (for the Hughs/Westview area), land reclamation, storage of construction highway materials, subordinate classroom structures, and other uses that the City establishes a sunset clause, a date of expiration. The criteria for considering interim use permits are provided in City Code 12-15-8. Review Criteria: a. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend an interim use permit and the Council shall issue such interim use permit only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: 10 i. Will not create an excess burden on parks, streets, and other public facilities; ii. Will not be injurious to the surrounding neighborhood or otherwise harm the public health, safety, and general welfare; iii. Will not have a negative effect on values of property and scenic views; iv. Will be subject to, by agreement with the owner, any conditions that the City Council has deemed appropriate for permission of the use, including a condition that the owner may be required to provide an appropriate financial surety to cover the cost of removing the interim use and any interim structures upon the expiration of the interim use permit. b. Termination. An interim use permit shall terminate upon the occurrence of any of the following events, whichever occurs first; i. Five (5) years from the date of approval; or ii. The date or event stated in the permit; or iii. An amendment to the City Code that either no longer allows the interim use or now permits the interim use; or iv. The use has been discontinued for six months. 12. Variance Variances are essentially a waiver of a specific City Code requirement that may be granted when unique circumstances are demonstrated by the applicant. The Commission is asked to compare an applicant's request to the Zoning Code and the criteria of City Code 12-15-9 to determine if a recommendation of approval or denial is appropriate. Review Criteria: a. Variance shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the official control and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. b. Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the official control. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means: 7 The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by an official control; Means the landowner would like to use the property in a particular reasonable way but cannot do so under the current ordinance. It does not mean that the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. For example, if the variance application is for building too close to a lot line, or does not meet the required setback, the focus of the first factor is whether the request to place a building there is reasonable. ii. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The uniqueness generally relates to the physical characteristics of the property. iii. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; Will the resulting structure be out of scale, out of place or inconsistent with the surrounding area? iv. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations can be considered, however cannot be the sole factor. 13. Planned Unit Development (PUD) CITY CODE 13-3-1: PURPOSE: The purpose of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) is to encourage more efficient allocation of density and intensity of land use where such arrangement is desirable and feasible by providing the means for greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design than provided under the strict application of this code. It must be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City Council that a higher quality development will result than could be otherwise achieved through strict application of this code. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004) 13-3-6: ZONING AND SUBDIVISION STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS: All standards and provisions relating to an original zoning district shall apply, unless otherwise approved as part of the PUD. All standards may be modified or waived provided the applicant demonstrates harmony with the E': purpose of the PUD and the findings described in Section 13-3-9 of this chapter. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004) If the PUD does not change the underlining zoning, then the standards still apply. For example in the R-1 Single Family -Rural zoning district, the following are lot standards: • Lot size of 2.5 acres • Lots 300 feet wide at the front yard setback line • Lot depth of 150 feet • Density of 0.4 units per acre 13-3-9: FINDINGS REQUIRED: In order for a PUD to be approved, the City shall find that the following are present: A. The proposed development is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan of the city. B. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The proposed development demonstrates how each modified or waived requirement contributes to achieving the purpose of a PUD. D. The PUD is of composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation are feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004) 13-3-11: DESIRABLE PUD DESIGN QUALITIES: The following design qualities will be sought in any PUD: A. Achieves efficiency in the provision of streets and utilities and preserves area to achieve the elements of design qualities described in this chapter. • Minimizing soil disturbances for the construction of roadways? • Minimizing impacts to wetlands? • Openness to modifying design standards, such as street width, setbacks, lot dimensions, lot sizes? B. Provides convenient and safe access for vehicles and pedestrians and all types of activity that are anticipated to be a part of the proposed development. • Review of access into and out of the development? • Review of multimodal traffic within the development? • Review of multimodal traffic to connect to existing amenities? E C. Provides a buffer between different uses, adjacent properties, roadways, between backyards of back-to-back lots. • Tree stand preservation? • Landscaping plans? • Restrictive Easements? • Home Owners Association (HOA)? D. Preserves existing stands of trees and/or significant trees. • Tree stand preservation? • Moving roadways to avoid trees or significant trees? • Smaller lots than the 2.5 acres are considered in order to place a roadway in an area to preserve trees? E. Provides considerable landscaping treatments that complement the overall design and contribute toward an overall landscaping theme. • Additional trees for each lot? • Monument entrances? • Rain gardens? F. Preserves significant usable space on individual lots or through the provision of open space within the development. • R-1 zoning requires a total of 8,600 square feet of upland (3,600 sq ft for home and 5, 000 square feet for primary and secondary septic location); would a half (5) acre of upland or more per lot be considered "significant usable space? • If a developer could provide more upland per lot vs. 8,600 square feet, would council consider a smaller lot than 2.5 acres? • If a developer provided open space either as HOA owned or provided additional parkland or preserve to the City, would council consider smaller lots than 2.5 acres? • Clustering? G. Provides an attractive streetscape through the use of undulating topography, landscaping, decorative street lighting, decorative mailbox groupings, retaining walls, boulders, fencing, area identification signs, etc. • If "Undulating topography" creates lots that are less than 2.5 acres, is that acceptable? • If minimizing the impact of construction creates smaller lots, is that acceptable? 10 H. The proposed structures within the development demonstrate quality architectural design and the use of high -quality building materials for unique design and detailing. • Custom home sites? • Limitations on building materials? • Color restrictions? • Home style restrictions (ramblers, two story, patio/slab, etc.)? I. The lasting quality of the development will be ensured by design, maintenance and use guidelines established through an owners' association. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004). • If the HOA restricts uses that the City Code allows, is that acceptable? • Limit home occupations? • Not allow for accessory structures, additional limits on accessory structures size, • Restrict parking in driveways? • Require additional landscaping? • Other code restrictions? 13-3-12: APPROVAL OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: The developer must demonstrate that the amenities and qualities of the Planned Unit Development are beneficial and in the public interest to allow the development to be approved. A substantial amount of the design qualities identified in Section 13-3-11 of this chapter shall be found to be present in order to approve a PUD. The amount of amenities and type of qualities that constitute an acceptable PUD are at the sole discretion of the City Council to determine. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004) 11 General Applications Process Applicant meets with City Staff ARC Staff Review Planning Revisions Eng. PW Fire Bldg. Admin 100 Nat. Res. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting - Hold Public Hearing - Recommendation to City Council City Council Meeting — FINAL DECISION to \l T� • 1 Applicant submits Application O SUENnIen Sr'Can" Staff Comments - Develop PZ Agenda Item - Schedule Public Hearing Develop CC Agenda Item including Planning and Zoning Commission Comments 'L 1-NIED < -, 1% 12 Making Recommendations Based on Findings of Fact Working with municipal land use regulations can be difficult for both city officials and residents. Sometimes cities need to make controversial decisions, and no matter what the result, someone will be unhappy. An important part of the process is developing and adopting written "findings of fact" that explain the decision. Carefully and thoughtfully developing written findings of fact can help solve a contentious problem because it forces officials to focus their review on the merit of an application. It also produces a record that makes it easier for a court to uphold the decision if it is challenged. This is especially important when making a recommendation to deny an application. Findings of fact should explain to the reader how and why the City reached its decision and should: • Identify the relevant legal criteria, such as City Code or Comprehensive Plan requirements. • Explain the relevant facts relating to the particular application. • Apply those facts to the legal criteria. For example, a finding of fact for denial could be: City Code 12-3-5 requires a minimum lot size in the R-4 zoning district of 11,400 square feet. The proposed application is proposing a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet. Since the proposed application is located in the R-4 zoning district and does not meet the minimum lot size established by City Code 12-3-5, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends denial to the City Council. Please keep in mind that the findings must be facts, and not opinion or hearsay. For example, if the Commission wanted to recommend denial of an application but as part of the application a traffic study was conducted showing that the amount of traffic created would not burden adjacent streets, the Commission should not cite traffic concerns as a finding for its recommendation of denial as the facts would not support its recommendation. Additionally, the findings should only relate to items under the City's jurisdiction. For example, denying a proposed residential development out of concern that it could increase classroom sizes at a school is not a good finding of fact as schools are outside of the City's jurisdiction. The same is true for private utility infrastructure such as power or natural gas. Resident opposition alone also cannot be a reason for denial. City staff are available during the meeting to assist with creating findings of fact. The Commission, through its recommendation, can also allow City staff to review the entirety of a meeting and come up with findings to be forwarded to the City Council based off the Commission's discussion. G:IPlanninglPlanning CommissionlPlat PUD Review Training/P&Z Procedures — Revised 2024 - 03-20-24 13 • Increa of levy for an EDA. • Continu ttion of a municipal liquor store after a net loss for two of three consecutive years. • Adoption r amendment of a zoning ordinance. • Subdivision\on�ditional ions. • Granting ouse permit. Adoption or amendment by ordinance. There are othens that may require public hearings. Contact the League's Research Department at(6Si)281-12o) g2S-1122 for further information if you are unsure about a particular situation. The open meeting law The Minnesota open meeting law generally requires that all meetings of public bodies be open to the public. This presumption of openness serves three basic purposes: • To prohibit actions from being taken at a secret meeting where it is impossible for the interested public to become fully informed concerning decisions of public bodies or detect improper influences. • To ensure the public's right to be informed. • To afford the public an opportunity to present its views to the public body. The open meeting law also contains some specific notice and record -keeping requirements, which are discussed in detail in later sections of this document. ■ Groups to which the law applies The open meeting law applies to all governing bodies of any school district, unorganized territory, county, city, town or other public body, and to any committee, sub -committee, board, department or commission of a public body. Thus, the law applies to meetings of all city councils, planning commissions, advisory boards, firefighter relief associations, economic development authorities, and housing redevelopment authorities, among others. The Minnesota Supreme Court has held, however, that the governing body of a municipal power agency, created under Minn. Stat. §§ 4S3.51-453.62, is not subject to the open meeting law because the Minnesota Legislature granted these agencies authority to conduct their affairs as private corporations. ■ What is a meeting? There is no statutory definition of the term "meeting" for the purpose of the open meeting law. Minnesota courts have generally ruled that a meeting is a gathering of a quorum of public officials to discuss, decide or receive information on matters over which they have authority. Because the term "meeting" has not been clearly defined, the issue of whether or not a meeting has been held must be decided on a case -by -case basis. Some examples of cases are discussed in further detail in a later section of this memo. ■ Gatherings to which the law applies The open meeting law applies to any gathering of a quorum or more of public officials where the members discuss, decide or receive information as a group on issues relating to the official business of the public body. A "quorum" is a majority of the members of a statutory city council. A majority of the qualified members of any board or commission also constitutes a quorum. Home rule charter cities may have different quorum requirements in their charters. Thus, the open meeting law would apply to any of the following types of gatherings: • Regular and special meetings. • Public hearings. • Executive sessions. • Work sessions. • Retreats. A Good Start to Good Governance League of Minnesota Cities ■ Exceptions and the procedures to use them There are some exceptions to the open meeting law. Under certain circumstances, some meetings may be closed. There are also some meetings that must be closed. Before a meeting can be closed under any of the exceptions, the council must state on the record the specific grounds permitting the meeting to be closed and describe the subject to be discussed. All closed meetings, except those closed as permitted by the attorney -client privilege, must be electronically recorded at the expense of the public body. Unless otherwise provided by law, the recordings must be preserved for at least three years after the date of the meeting. 1. Meetings that may be closed The public body may choose to close certain meetings. The following types of meetings may be closed: Meetings to consider strategies for labor negotiations under PELRA. Although a meeting to consider strategies for labor negotiations maybe closed, the actual negotiations must be done at an open meeting if a quorum of the councit is present. Procedure. The following must be done to use this exception: — Before closing the meeting, the council must decide to close the meeting by a majority vote at a public meeting. — Before closing the meeting, the council must state on the record the specific grounds permitting the meeting to be closed and describe the subject to be discussed. — A written roll of all people present at the closed meeting must be available to the public after the closed meeting. — The meeting must be tape-recorded. — The recording must be kept for two years after the contract is signed. — The recording becomes public after all labor agreements are signed by the city council for the current budget period. If an action claiming that other public business was transacted at the closed meeting is brought during the time the tape is not public, the court will review the recording privately. If it finds no violation of the open meeting law, the action will be dismissed and the recording will be preserved in court records until it becomes available to the public. If the court determines there may have been a violation, the entire recording may be introduced at the trial. However, the court may issue appropriate protective orders requested by either party. • Meetings to evaluate the performance of an individual subject to the public body's authority. Procedure. The following must be done to use this exception: — The public body must identify the individual to be evaluated prior to closing the meeting. — The meeting must be open at the request of the individual who is the subject of the meeting, so some advance notice to the individual is needed in order to allow the individual to make an informed decision. — Before closing the meeting, the council must state on the record the specific grounds permitting the meeting to be closed and describe the subject to be discussed. — The meeting must be electronically recorded, and the recording must be preserved for at least three years after the meeting. — At the next open meeting, the public body must summarize its conclusions regarding the evaluation. The council should be careful not to release private or confidential data in its summary. • Attorney -client privilege. Meetings between the governing body and its attorney to discuss active, threatened, or pending litigation may be closed when the balancing of the purposes served by the attorney -client privilege against those served by the open meeting law dictates the need for absolute confidentiality. The need for absolute confidentiality should relate to litigation strategy, and will usually arise only after a substantive decision on the underlying matter has been made. This privilege may not be abused to suppress public observations of the decision -making process, and does not include situations where the council will be receiving general legal opinions and advice on the strengths and weaknesses of a proposed underlying action that may give rise to future litigation. A Good Start to Good Governance League of Minnesota Cities 9 Procedure. The following must be done to use this exception: — Before closing the meeting, the council must state on the record the specific grounds permitting the meeting to be closed and describe the subject to be discussed. The council should also describe how a balancing of the purposes of the attorney -client privilege against the purposes of the open meeting law demonstrates the need for absolute confidentiality. — The council must actually communicate with its attorney at the meeting. • Purchase or sale of property. A public body may close a meeting to: determine the asking price for real or personal property to be sold by the public body, review confidential or nonpublic appraisal data; develop or consider offers or counteroffers for the purchase or sale of real or personal property. Procedure. The following must be done to use this exception: — Before closing the meeting, the public body must state on the record the specific grounds for closing the meeting, describe the subject to be discussed, and identify the particular property that is the subject of the meeting. — The meeting must be tape-recorded and the property must be identified on the tape. The recording must be preserved for eight years, and must be made available to the public after all property discussed at the meeting has been purchased or sold or after the public body has abandoned the purchase or sale. — A list of councilmembers and all other persons present at the closed meeting must be made available to the public after the closed meeting. — The actual purchase or sale of the property must be approved at an open meeting, and the purchase or sale price is public data. Security Briefings. A meeting may be closed to receive security briefing and reports, to discuss issues related to security systems, to discuss emergency -response procedures and to discuss security deficiencies in or recommendations regarding public services, infrastructure, and facilities — if disclosure of the information would pose a danger to public safety or compromise security procedures or responses. Financial issues related to security matters must be discussed, and all related financial decisions must be made at an open meeting. Procedure. The following must be done to use this exception: — Before closing the meeting, the public body must state on the record the specific grounds for closing the meeting and describe the subject to be discussed. When describing the subject to be discussed, the public body must refer to the facilities, systems, procedures, services or Infrastructure to be considered during the closed meeting. — The closed meeting must be tape-recorded, and the recording must be preserved for at least four years. 2. Meetings that must be closed There are some meetings that the law requires to be closed. The following meetings must be closed: • Meetings for preliminary consideration of allegations or charges against an individual subject to the public body's authority. While the law permits the council to announce that it is closing a meeting to consider charges against an individual, it is still the best practice not to refer to that individual. by name. The council should state only that it is closing the meeting to give preliminary consideration to allegations against someone subject to its authority. However, if someone requests the name of the employee who is the subject of the closed meeting, the name will probably have to be furnished since the existence and status of any complaints against an employee are public data. Procedure. The following must be done to use this exception: — Before closing the meeting, the council must state on the record the specific grounds for closing the meeting and describe the subject to be discussed. — The meeting must be open at the request of the individual who is the subject of the meeting. Thus, the individual should be given advance notice of the existence and nature of the charges against him or her, so that the individual can make an informed decision. — The meeting must be electronically recorded and the recording must be preserved for at least three years after the meeting. A Good Start to Good Governance League of Minnesota Cities 10 — If the public body decides that discipline of any nature may be warranted regarding the specific charges, further meetings must be open. (Note: There is a special provision dealing with allegations of law enforcement personnel misconduct; see next discussion*.) • Portions of meetings at which any of the following data is discussed. — Data that would identify alleged victims or reporters of criminal sexual conduct, domestic abuse, or maltreatment of minors or vulnerable adults. — *Internal affairs data relating to allegations of law enforcement personnel misconduct or active law enforcement investigative data. — Educational data, health data, medical data, welfare data or mental health data that are not - public data. — An individual's medical records governed by sections §§ 144.291 to 144.2.98. Procedure. Before closing the meeting, the council must state on the record the specific grounds for closing the meeting and describe the subject to be discussed. The meeting must be electronically recorded, and the recording must be preserved for at least three years after the meeting. ■ Notice requirements Public notice must be given of all meetings of a public body. The notice requirements differ depending on the type of meeting. However, if a person receives actual notice of a meeting at least 24 hours before the meeting, all notice requirements under the open meeting law are satisfied, regardless of the method of receipt. It should also be noted that statutory cities have some additional requirements for mailing notice to their councilmembers regarding special meetings. There may also be additional notice requirements for home rule charter cities to consider. These cities should consult their charters for more information. 1. Regular meetings A schedule of the regular meetings must be kept on file in the city office. If the city decides to hold a meeting at a different time or place, it must give the notice required for a special meeting. Cities must keep a schedule of the regular meetings of the council on file at the primary office of the council. This requirement can be complied with by posting the regular meeting schedule in a convenient public location. 2. Special meetings A special meeting is a meeting that is held at a time or location different from that of a regular meeting. A city must post written notice of a special meeting on its principal bulletin board or on the door of its meeting room if it does not have a bulletin board. If notice is posted on a bulletin board, the bulletin board must be located in a place that is reasonably accessible to the public. The notice must give the date, time, place, and purpose of the meeting. It must also be mailed to each individual who has filed a written request for notice of special meetings. As an alternative to posting the notice, the city can publish notice in the official newspaper at least three days before the meeting. A city must post written notice of a special meeting on its principal bulletin board or on the door of its meeting room if it does not have a bulletin board at least three days prior to the meeting. In statutory cities, the clerk must mail notice of special meetings to all councilmembers at least one day before the meeting. In calculating the number of days for providing notice, do not count the first day that the notice is given, but do count the last day. If the last day is a Saturday, Sunday or a legal holiday, that day is omitted from the calculation and the following day is considered the last day (unless, of course, it happens to be a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday). A Good Start to Good Governance League of Minnesota Cities 11 3. Emergency meetings An "emergency meeting" is a special meeting called because of circumstances that, in the judgment of the public body, require immediate consideration by the public body. Posted or published notice of an emergency meeting is not required. However, the city must make a good faith effort to notify each news outlet that has filed a written request for notice. Notice must be given by telephone or any other method to notify members of the public body. The notice must include the subject of the meeting. 4. Recessed or continued meetings No additional notice is needed for a recessed or continued meeting if all of the following criteria are met: • The meeting is a recessed or continued session of a previous meeting. • The time and place of the meeting was established during the previous meeting. • The time and place of the meeting was recorded in the minutes of the previous meeting. S. Closed meetings The same notice requirements apply to closed meetings as to open meetings. Additionally, advance notice to an individual who will be the subject of such a meeting is needed under certain circumstances (such as to employees who are the subject of performance evaluations or disciplinary proceedings). ■ Written materials At least one copy of the materials related to agenda items that are made available to the council at or before the meeting must also be made available for inspection by the public. However, this does not apply to not -public data or materials relating to the agenda items of a closed meeting. Common problems In applying the law There are many situations for which the open meeting law is unclear. This section provides an overview of some of the more common situations and how the law may be applied. 1. Data practices Generally, meetings may not be closed to discuss data that is not public. However, the public body must close any part of a meeting at which certain types of not -public data are discussed (such as active law enforcement investigative data, police internal affairs data, medical records data, and certain victim, health, medical or welfare data). If not -public data is discussed at an open meeting when the meeting is required to be closed, it is a violation of the open meeting law. Discussions of some types of not -public data may also be a violation of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (MGDPA). However, not -public data may generally be discussed at an open meeting without liability or penalty if both of the following criteria are met: • The disclosure relates to a matter within the scope of the council's authority. • The disclosure is necessary to conduct the business or agenda item before the public body. Data that is discussed at an open meeting retains its original classification under the MGDPA. However, a record of the meeting is public, regardless of the form. It is suggested that not -public data that is discussed at an open meeting not be specifically detailed in the minutes. 2. Executive sessions The attorney general has advised that executive sessions of a city council must be open to the public. 3. Committees and liaisons The attorney general has advised that standing committees appointed by a governing body also are likely subject to the open meeting law. Many city councils create committees to make recommendations to the council. Commonly, such committees will be responsible for researching a particular area and submitting a recommendation to the council for its approval. Such committees are often labeled as advisory, and the council is still responsible for making the final decision. The law is not clear when these types of committees or citizen panels are subject to the Open Meeting Law. Courts often do a fact analysis when reviewing Open Meeting Law challenges involving so-called "advisory" committees to determine if the committee represents a standing committee whose recommendations the council generally or always follows, or if the committee acts in more of an ad hoc advisory capacity. Many cities err on the side of caution and follow Open Meeting Law guidelines for all its citizen advisory committees. A Good Start to Good Governance League of Minnesota Cities 12 YOU'LL WANT KNO`N THIS City councils routinely appoint individual councilmembers to act as liaisons between the council and particular committees. These types of meetings may also be subject to the open meeting law if the committee contains a quorum or more of the council or has decision -making authority. In addition, notice for a special council meeting may be needed if a quorum of the council will be present at the meeting and participating in the discussion. For example, when a quorum of a city council attended a meeting of the city's planning commission, the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled that there was a violation of the open meeting law, not because of the councilmembers' attendance at the meeting, but because the councilmembers conducted public business in conjunction with that meeting. Based on that decision, the attorney general has advised that mere attendance by additional councilmembers at a meeting of a council committee held in compliance with the open meeting law would not constitute a special council meeting requiring separate notice. The attorney general warned, however, that the additional councilmembers should not participate in committee discussions or deliberations absent a separate notice of a special city council meeting. 4. Chance or social gatherings Chance or social gatherings of a quorum are not considered meetings under the open meeting law V N11. and are therefore exempt from it. However, a quorum may not, as a group, discuss or receive TO information on official business in any setting under the guise of a social gathering. KN ow THIS In 1982, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that a conversation between two councilmembers over lunch regarding an application for a special -use permit did not violate the open meeting law because a quorum was not present. S. Serial gatherings The Minnesota Supreme Court has noted that meetings of less than a quorum of the public body held serially to avoid public hearings or to fashion agreement on an issue may violate the open meeting law. In short, this type of situation is a circumvention of the statute. As such, councilmembers should avoid this type of practice. 6. Technology trouble The open meeting law does not address situations that may occur as a result of communication through telephone calls, letters, email or similar technology. The Minnesota Supreme Court found that the open meeting law did not apply to letters or to telephone conversations between less than a quorum. While it is possible that a similar decision might be reached concerning the use of email and other forms of technology, it should be stressed that if a quorum of members is involved in the communication, it would likely be considered to be a violation of the open meeting law. In addition, serial discussions between less than a quorum of the council that are used to deliberate matters that should be dealt with at an open meeting would likely violate the open meeting law. Therefore, city councils and other groups to which the open meeting law applies should not use letters, telephone conversations, email, and other such technology if the following circumstances exist: • A quorum of the council is involved. • Information relating to official city business is being discussed. The use of social media by members of a public body does not violate the open meeting law as long as the social media use is limited to exchanges with all members of the general public. The open meeting law does not define the term "social media," but this term is generally understood to mean forms of electronic communication, including websites for social networking like Facebook, LinkedIn, as well as blogs and microblogs like Twitter through which users create online communities to share information, ideas, and other content. The personal use of social media by councilmembers could still be used to support other claims such as claims of defamation or of conflict of interest in decision -making. As a result, councilmembers should make sure that any comments they make on social media are factually correct and should not comment on issues that will come before the council in the future for a quasi- judicial hearing and decision, such as the consideration of whether to grant an application for a conditional use permit. A Good Start to Good Governance League of Minnesota Cities 13 City -owned social media accounts and social media accounts of elected officials (being used in their role as an elected official) must keep in mind First Amendment protections when considering policies about comment moderation and the blocking of users. Policies that restrict comments to the topic or delete negative comments — and practices of blocking or restricting friends or followers — could face challenges. Councilmembers unable to make a meeting may ask to attend meetings through interactive technology, such as Skype, Zoom, Teams, or other technology where the user can be seen and heard. There is an exception to the open meeting law where a member can be in attendance through the use of interactive technology. The remote location must be a public place unless the councilmember qualifies for one of the limited exceptions — which includes the current military service exception or for the health exception for 6o days after the removal of a previously declared emergency under Minn. Stat. ia.31— both of which only can be used three time per year. Additionally, when one or more members join remotely, then notice must be posted at least three days before the meeting indicating the location from which the remote attendee or attendees are joining. We encourage interested cities to develop a policy for using technology like Zoom with the assistance of your city attorney ■ Intentional violations of the open meeting law A public officer who intentionally violates the open meeting law can be fined up to $300. This fine may not be paid by the public body. In addition, a court may also award reasonable costs, disbursements, and attorney fees up to $13,000 to the person who brought the violation to court. If a plaintiff prevails in a lawsuit under the open meeting law, a court shall award reasonable attorney fees if the court determines the public body was the subject of a prior written advisory opinion from the commissioner of the Department of Administration, and the court finds that the opinion is directly related to the lawsuit and that the public body did not act in conformity with the opinion. A court is also required to give deference to the advisory opinion in a lawsuit brought to determine whether the open meeting law was violated. If a public official is found to have intentionally violated this chapter in three or more separate actions, the public official must be removed from office and may not serve in any other capacity with that public body for a period of time equal to the term of office the person was serving. However, removal is only required If the conduct constitutes malfeasance or nonfeasance. The statute does not address whether actions taken at an improper meeting would be invalid. The Minnesota Supreme Court once held that an attempted school district consolidation was fatally defective when the initiating resolution was adopted at a meeting that was not open to the public. However, in more recent decisions, Minnesota courts have refused to invalidate actions taken at improperly closed meetings. In an unpublished decision, the court stated that "even a violation of the open meeting law will not invalidate actions taken at that meeting." A public body may pay any costs, disbursements or attorney fees incurred by or awarded against any of its members for an action under the open meeting law. A Good Start to Good Governance League of Minnesota Cities NDL '1' Y O F OVEA 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVE RMN.GOV Remote Meeting Participation Policy SECTION 1: SCOPE A. BACKGROUND: The City of Andover seeks to develop guidelines to promote transparent and orderly use of electronic technology that allows Council and Commission members to attend meetings from a remote location. Electronic audio/video attendance options continue to advance and evolve, along with the laws that govern such attendance. The city may adopt regulations that are more restrictive (not more lenient) than those provided by state law. B. PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to create guidelines governing the remote attendance and participation of members at Council and Commission meetings. Advance notifications and limits are established to provide proper notification to the public, and to allow the City to arrange the appropriate technology to cover the meeting. The general expectation is that individuals will make every practical attempt to be physically present and that the purpose of this policy is to allow for exceptions when the member is unable to physically attend a meeting. C. OTHER MEETING PARTICIPANTS: City staff, applicants, and other meeting participants may attend meetings remotely and are not subject to the policy or statutory limitations outlined within this policy. SECTION 2: CRITERIA/PROCEDURE A. ELIGIBLE USERS: Members of the City Council and members of any formally established Commission of the City. B. APPLICATION: Eligible users may attend and participate in any regular meeting of their respective Council or Commission in accordance with this policy. C. NOTIFICATION: Eligible Users wishing to participate via interactive technology shall notify the City Clerk or Commission Liaison, in writing, no earlier than ten (10) days, and no later than 72 hours prior to the meeting. In the event of an emergency, or unforeseen need, the City Clerk or Commission Liaison will seek approval from the Mayor or Commission Chair. The name and location of eligible members attending a meeting via electronic medium shall be posted in conjunction with, and in the same manner as, the regular agenda. D. MAXIMUM REMOTE ATTENDEES: There will be no maximum number of remote attendees so long as at least one (1) City Councilmember or member of a formally established Commission of the City is physically present. If all members request remote attendance, eligible participants for any meeting will be determined by the order in which notification was received by the City Clerk or Commission Liaison. E. ANNUAL USE: An eligible user may attend via interactive technology, an unlimited number of times per year, contingent upon the general expectation that individuals will make every practical attempt to be physically present. F. OTHER: Remote attendance and participation at any public meeting shall be in full compliance with the Open Meeting Law (OML), Minnesota Statutes section 13D.02, subdivision 1. All members of the public showing up at a remote location must be able to see and hear all discussion and votes. All members of the body must be ableto see and hear one another, as well as the public. G. EXCEPTIONS: The requirements of this policy may be waived in the event of an emergency as defined by state statute. H. DECORUM: It is expected that all members attending remotely will conduct himself or herself in a professional manner and attend only from a meeting location that is suitable for the proper conduct of professional business. I. EXPENSES: Members attending remotely will cover all extraordinary costs necessary for the connection. J. TECHNOLOGY: Remote meeting attendees shall comply with all technological and security standards as established by QCTV and the City's Information Technology staff. 2 Typical Planning and Zoning Meeting Cadence revised Feb. 2023 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of Minutes (Motion, Second, Majority Vote) Chair may assume motion and approval if 4. Public Hearing(s) no objection and all the same 4.1. Introduction by Chair commissioners identified as present in the 4.2. Presentation by Staff minutes are in the meeting. 4.3. Questions for Staff from Commission (Clarifications) 4.4. Open the Public Hearing (Motion, Second, Majority Vote) Chair may assume motion and 4.4.1. Presentation from Applicant approval if no objection 4.4.2. Questions for Applicant from Commission Ask Staff for any public comments 4.4.3. Statements/Questions for Commission fromrVNI11i8 prior to Public Hearing 4.4.4. Questions for Public from Commission 4.4.5. Recall Applicant (Repeat 4.2 thru 4.5 until all facts/opinions are obtained) 4.5. Close the Public Hearing (Motion, Second, Majority Vote) Chair may assume motion and 4.6. Discussion on topic from Commission approval if no objection 4.6.1. Questions for Staff from Commission during Discussion. 4.7. If no recommendation is requested, the hearing is completed when the Commission ends Discussion. The meeting agenda advances. 4.8. If a recommendation is requested, one of two motions are typical: 4.8.1. A motion to APPROVE is offered from a Commissioner 4.8.1.1. The motion is seconded 4.8.1.2. The motion is discussed. 4.8.1.3. A vote is called (Majority required to succeed) 4.8.1.3.1. If the motion succeeds, the hearing is over. 4.8.1.3.2. If the motion fails, return to item 4.6. 4.8.2. A motion to DENY is offered from a Commissioner 4.8.2.1. A motion to DENY must include reasons for denial that align with city code. 4.8.2.2. The motion is seconded 4.8.2.3. The motion is discussed. 4.8.2.4. A vote is called (Majority required to succeed) 4.8.2.4.1. If the motion succeeds, the hearing is over. 4.8.2.4.2. If the motion fails, return to item 4.6. 5. Other Business 5.1. Statements from Staff 5.1.1. Questions from Commission 5.2. Statements from Commission 6. Adjourn (Motion, Second, Majority Vote) Chair may assume motion and approval if no objection Note: A motion to TABLE is technically possible, but rare and not advised. It requires a date certain or specific event that will trigger advancement of the issue. Tabling may have unintended consequences jeopardizing compliance with timing requirements of MN Statutes. The preferred approach would be to Recommend Deny and City Council may elect to approve, approve with conditions, deny, or table to a stated time and/or event. 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Jake Griffiths, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes DATE: March 26, 2024 ACTION REQUESTED The Planning & Zoning Commission is requested to approve the February 28, 2024 regular meeting minutes. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING — FEBR UARY 28, 2024 9 10 The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was 11 called to order by Chairperson Godfrey on February 28, 2024, 7:00 p.m., at the Andover 12 City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. 13 14 Commissioners present: Chairperson Karen Godfrey, Commissioners Scott Hudson, 15 Bert Koehler IV, Nick Loehlein, Jon Shafto, and Pat 16 Shuman Jr. 17 18 Commissioners absent: Commissioner Ryan Winge 19 20 Also present: Community Development Director Joe Janish, City Planner 21 Peter Hellegers 22 23 24 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 25 26 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 27 28 February 13, 2024 Regular Meeting 29 30 Mr. Janish noted on page 4 line 1 should be Mr. Lucas Dickens at 17203 Tulip Street. 31 32 Motion by Loehlein, seconded by Hudson, to approve the minutes of the February 13, 33 2024 Regular Meeting as revised. Motion carried on a 5-ayes, 0-nays, 1-present 34 (Koehler), 1-absent (Winge) vote. 35 36 PUBLIC HEARING: Consider a Planned Unit Development Amendment to amend the 37 Petersen Farms Planned Unit Development to modify portions of the phase known as 38 Legacy at Petersen Farms and plat a portion of the property (Applicant — JD Andover 39 Holdings 40 41 Community Development Director Janish reviewed this request will modify the PUD as 42 approved on June 6, 2023. Changes to the Master Plan and each preliminary plat require 43 an amendment to the PUD. The applicant's narrative summarizes the reason for this 44 request: 45 Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — February 28, 2024 Page 2 1 During the approval process of phase 3 — Legacy at Petersen Farms, there was a 2 tremendous amount of work involved in the configuration of the Southwest corner 3 of the plat. This work was completed in conjunction with the County efforts to 4 construct one round -about directly to the Southeast of the project, and another 5 possible future round -about to the Southwest on Highway 7 to mitigate traffic 6 concerns on Highway 7 and included significant efforts to provide adequate 7 interim accommodations for the unknown timing and configuration of those 8 roadway improvements, and future development. 9 10 Following approvals on August 15, 2023, the applicant reviewed the approved 11 conditions that included multiple roadway configurations, two gated emergency 12 access points onto Highway 7, multiple temporary and permanent easements to 13 accommodate a variety of potential future improvements, two dead-end roadways, 14 a temp cul-de-sac, and several less -than -ideal lot configurations to accommodate 15 those unknown conditions. Ultimately the applicant realized all this reflected a 16 patchwork quilt of solutions presented by all involved to reach a workable solution 17 that would gain approvals and did not necessarily reflect a solution would have 18 been reached if all these constraints had been identified from the beginning. 19 20 After approval the applicant stepped back and re-evaluated potential solutions 21 given the concerns and conditions that came about during the approval process. 22 This resulted in more thoughtful design options that more effectively 23 accommodated the conditions that became more apparent as they moved through 24 approvals earlier. The applicant entered negotiations and reached an agreement 25 with the family to obtain the additional land necessary and are proposing a revised 26 configuration for this area. 27 28 Mr. Janish reviewed the definition of a Planned Unit Development and indicated the 29 property on a map. The property is not located within the Metropolitan Urban Service 30 Area Boundary. The property was formally removed from "Agricultural Preserve" by the 31 current landowner in April 2018. In order to remove the property the land owner 32 submitted a request in April 2010. A Visual Comparison of the previously approved 33 layout to the Proposed amendment layout. Adjustments have been made to lot lines 34 resulting in larger lots. The data behind the request was reviewed. The gross density has 35 increased by .01 %. The original farmhouse was pulled out of the PUD. The PUD requires 36 amendments for each Phase of Development. 37 38 Mr. Janish stated if the amendment tonight is not approved the applicant will still be able 39 to move forward with the proposal as presented in the past. However, as the applicant has 40 been working through the development process, they believe a better layout has presented 41 itself. If this is approved, it would be considered Legacy at Petersen Farms 2nd addition. A 42 drawing showing the County Road Intersections was displayed. Anoka County is in 43 process of designing the roundabout on County Road 7. The Shoreland Management 44 Density Data chart has not changed. Screening along County Road 7 was displayed for the Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — February 28, 2024 Page 3 1 Commission. The Applicant is requesting the builder/owner installs the screening from 2 County Roadway. 3 4 The proposed amendment to the PUD layout provides the following: 5 • Elimination of a permanent emergency access. 6 • Elimination of a temporary emergency access. 7 • Elimination of a permanent cul-de-sac. 8 • Elimination of a temporary cul-de-sac. 9 • Lot configuration. 10 • Additional lot along Quapaw Street NW. 11 • 32 lots in Legacy phase compared to 36 lots currently approved. 12 • Applicant requests homeowner/builder to provide screening along 71h Avenue NW. 13 14 The requested PUD Amendment does not address future phases as they remain the same. 15 The request also does not address the length of the future 1701h Avenue NW cul-de-sac. 16 The PUD narrative submitted by the developer was provided for Commission review. 17 18 Commissioner Loehlein asked Mr. Janish to clarify on page 10 the number of lots going 19 from 33 to 36 and on page 2 the number of lots going from 36 to 32. Mr. Janish stated 20 there would be 3 lots added in a future phase. There is not a net increase in total number of 21 lots. 22 23 Commissioner Koehler IV asked about screening being handled by builder/homeowner. 24 He referred back to PUD where screening has been required by applicant. Mr. Janish 25 stated this was typically done in an urban situation. Commissioner Koehler asked about 26 berming. The type of trees were determined by staff. If the City was to ask for berming 27 there would be almost 1.2 miles of berm to be constructed. This was to be a low impact 28 PUD. If berming was done stormwater ponds would need to be created. Commissioner 29 Koehler asked what happens if the owner wanted a fence or berm. Mr. Janish stated they 30 would need to get permits from the City. Commissioner Koehler is concerned about 31 consistency. 32 33 Commissioner Hudson referred to the future connection shown on the map, how is that 34 going to be handled. Will there be a stub or an easement. Mr. Janish stated the 5 acre 35 piece still has the rights. The Petersen family would be required to maintain that area. It 36 will be clear it will not be part of someone's yard. 37 38 Motion by Loehlein, seconded by Koehler, to open the public hearing at 7:22 p.m. 39 Motion carried on a 6-ayes, 0-nays, 1-absent (Winge) vote. 40 41 Mr. Janish summarized comments received in emails regarding this matter. Email from 42 Hope and Jud Ludtke 16932 Gevaro indicating they had questions about the PUD 43 regarding number of lots, tree removals and the community space getting smaller. Also the 44 number of wells and septic systems being put in these lots is concerning, and water usage. 45 The second email received was from Steve and Ellen Untz 4700 165`h Avenue NW, Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — February 28, 2024 Page 4 1 indicating they would like the applicant to consider berms and landscaping along Roanoke 2 St and 165th Avenue. This would also reduce road noise in the development. 3 4 Mr. Jason Osberg, 15356 Yukon St NW, JD Andover Holdings, representing the 5 applicant. He stated Mr. Janish was correct in saying a better solution was found. This is a 6 better layout for everyone. Commissioner Koehler stated he appreciates the looped road. 7 He asked how the screening would be handled by the builder. Mr. Osberg stated they do 8 not have water on site to water anything that would be planted. It is a maintenance issue. 9 The developer's agreement will be maintained. Mr. Osberg stated they are open to ideas 10 for screening. The trees would need to be installed within a certain time period. 11 12 Commissioner Loehlein asked that the chart on page 10 be displayed. He asked about the 13 number of lots during the various phases. He asked if the number of lots will change. Mr. 14 Osberg stated the original PUD contemplated 138 total lots when Phase 1 was started. 15 After doing the environmental research the number of lots has dropped. He does not know 16 how that will all work out. We are now down to 130 total lots. Mr. Janish stated Staff has 17 looked at gross density. The Code allows for .4 overall density. 18 19 Commissioner Hudson asked Mr. Osberg if there is some middle ground where a certain 20 design standard is agreed upon. He wants to see consistency across the board. He feels the 21 current plan is better than the past plan. Mr. Osberg stated they would be open to working 22 with Staff to create the meet in the middle language. 23 24 Motion by Loehlein, seconded by Shafto, to close the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. Motion 25 carried on a 6-ayes, 0-nays, 1-absent (Winge) vote. 26 27 Commissioner Koehler stated he likes kicking it to the builder as far as landscaping but he 28 is still concerned about the consistency and that it gets done in a reasonable time period. 29 30 Chair Godfrey asked if there is a way they could recommend putting in the developer's 31 agreement with the City accountability for the developer to assure the screening is done 32 according to the landscaping plan not specifying who is paying for it and who is putting it 33 in. This would ensure consistency and that the work would get done. Mr. Janish stated that 34 can be accomplished by adding section regarding landscaping. 35 36 Commissioner Koehler suggested within a year of occupancy the trees would need to be 37 planted. This would need to be included in the resolution. He supports the PUD with some 38 tweaking of the language regarding landscaping. 39 40 Commissioner Loehlein referred to item 19 on the approval resolution do the blanks need 41 to be filled in. 42 43 Motion by Loehlein, seconded by Koehler, to recommend the City Council approve the 44 Conditional Use Permit Amendment/Planned Unit Development Amendment requested by 45 Landform, on behalf of JD Andover Holdings, as shown as PUD Development Plan Phase Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — February 28, 2024 Page 5 1 3 Legacy at Petersen Farms, directing staff to craft the developer's agreement to specify 2 the developer is accountable to ensure the screening occurs by a date established by Staff 3 per the landscaping plan and striking item 19. Motion carried on a 6-ayes, 0-nays, 1-absent 4 vote. 6 PUBLIC HEARING: Consider a Preliminary Plat for Legacy at Petersen Farms 2"d 7 Addition (Applicant — JD Andover Holdings 8 9 Associate Planner Jake Griffiths reviewed the Commission is requested to review a 10 Preliminary Plat for Legacy at Petersen Farms 2nd Addition. This is an adjustment to the 11 third phase of a planned multi -phase development. Mr. Griffiths noted the property is not 12 located in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area and is part of a Planned Unit 13 Development. Mr. Griffiths reviewed Street Access, Emergency Access, Anoka County 14 Highway Department review, Sewer and Water Access, Lower Rum River Watershed 15 Management Organization review, Coordination with other Agencies and Tree 16 Preservation/Landscaping. The Park and Recreation Commission recommends cash in 17 lieu of land for Legacy at Petersen Farms 2nd Addition. A drawing showing the stormwater 18 information was presented. 19 20 All lots meet the minimum lot width, depth, and area requirements of the PUD as 21 approved by the Andover City Council. 22 23 Chair Godfrey asked if there are any remaining temporary cul-de-sacs in this Phase and Mr. 24 Janish stated there are not. Mr. Janish was asked to explain again drawing C.6.1. the future 25 roadways, ditches and culverts. Item 3 should be stricken from the resolution. Mr. Janish 26 stated the draft resolution will be reviewed and re -worded if necessary. Commissioner 27 Hudson asked about the five acres and the accessory structures. 28 29 Chair Godfrey assumed a motion to open the public hearing at 8:00 p.m. 30 31 Mr. Janish summarized the two emails received prior to the public hearing. 32 33 Mr. Janish summarized comments received in emails regarding this matter. Email from 34 Hope and Jud Ludtke 16932 Jivaro Street NW indicating they had questions about the 35 PUD regarding the number of lots, tree removals and the community space getting 36 smaller. Also the number of wells and septic systems being put in these lots is concerning, 37 and water usage. The second email received was from Steve and Ellen Untz 4700 165th 38 Avenue NW, indicating they would like the applicant to consider berms and landscaping 39 along Roanoke St and 1651h Avenue. This would also reduce road noise in the 40 development. 41 42 Mr. Jason Osberg, 15356 Yukon Street NW, JD Andover Holdings, thanked the 43 Commission for recommending approval to the previous PUD item. He looks forward to 44 working with the City on this proposed amendment. 45 Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —February 28, 2024 Page 6 1 Chair Godfrey assumed a motion to close the public hearing at 8:02 p.m. 2 3 Motion by Hudson, seconded by Koehler, to recommend the City Council approve the 4 Preliminary Plat of Legacy at Petersen Farms Second Addition striking item 3. Motion 5 carried on a 6 -ayes, 0-nays, 1-absent (Winge) vote. 6 7 This will come before the City Council on March 4, 2024. 8 9 OTHER BUSINESS 10 11 Mr. Janish stated the Lot Split recommended for approval at the last meeting was 12 approved by the City Council. 13 14 Commissioner Koehler asked if there was an update on the antenna that was scheduled to 15 be constructed back in October by AT&T and Mr. Janish stated it is estimated to be done 16 in April 2024. 17 18 ADJOURNMENT 19 20 Motion: Chair Godfrey assumed a motion to adjourn the meeting 8:08 p.m. Motion 21 carried by unanimous consent. 22 23 24 Respectfully Submitted, 25 26 27 28 Debbie Wolfe, Recording Secretary 29 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 9 CN T Y O F DoW 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Joe Janish, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Planned Unit Development — Andover Senior Campus — PID# 23-32- 24-32-0006 and 23-32-24-33-0002 (Applicant — JA Wedum Foundation) DATE: March 26, 2024 INTRODUCTION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Property that will be known as Andover Senior Campus. On May 24, 2022, the Planning and Zoning Commission and on June 7, 2022 the City Council reviewed a Sketch Plan for this project. Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council also saw a revised sketch at time of the most recent Comprehensive Plan Amendment which was reviewed in November, 2023. On March 4, 2024 the City Council amended the Comprehensive Plan and rezoned the property. The property is located at the southeast quadrant of Hanson Blvd NW and Crosstown Blvd NW. The proposal tonight follows the plan seen as part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The PUD is requested by J.A. Wedum Foundation. The property is currently planned for a senior residential project with an age restriction of 55 years or older. At this time staff is reviewing the Commercial Site Plan, the request for the Preliminary Plat is also part of tonight's agenda. Overview of Proposed project: 0 1.5 acres of Neighborhood Commercial, up to a 10,000 square foot building. • A total of 217 age restricted units are proposed. o Two brownstone buildings (16 units each). 0 9 slab on grade cottages. 0 176 units in a single, multi -story building; consisting of 110 independent living units, 40 assisted living units, 24 memory care units and 2 guest suites (visitors). Andover's 2018 Comprehensive Plan indicates that properties for multi -family developments are to be a Planned Unit Development (PUD). City Code 13-3-9 regulates the findings that are required for a PUD to be approved and 13-3-11 identifies desirable PUD design standards that are sought in any PUD proposal. As part of the attached PUD Narrative, the applicant addresses the design qualities they believe the city seeks when granting for a PUD proposal. What is a Planned Unit Development (PUD) City Code 13-3-1: PURPOSE: The purpose of a PUD is to encourage more efficient allocation of density and intensity of land use where such arrangement is desirable and feasible by providing the means for greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design than provided under the strict application of this code. It must be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City Council that a higher quality development will result than could be otherwise achieved through strict application of this code. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004) DISCUSSION Street Improvements Internal Roadways: The applicant is proposing private drives as part of the development. These private drives would include a width of 24 feet across or larger. Construction, and maintenance will be the responsibility of the owners in this area. Similar to Clocktower Commons to the north, easements will be recorded to allow ingress and egress of the parcels over each lot. Crosstown Blvd NW: The applicant will construct a right in right out. The applicant will also construct a right turn lane along Crosstown Blvd. NW. 150" Lane NW: A right turn lane exists on Hanson Blvd. NW for the access to 150' Lane NW. The applicant is proposing a full access, parking and access to the underground parking from 150' Lane NW. Bluebird Street NW: This will be a full access. Crosstown Blvd NW and Bluebird Street NW: The applicant will provide coordinated participation in the construction of a roundabout at this location. 2 y L �• V` •� �� • e y CIOCKTOWER COMMERCIAL ' • fV, RIGHT IN RIGHT QU7 4 FUI� ; �. ff • •,f /ai J. Z 0 Trees/Landscape The applicant has provided a tree study. Due to grading and stormwater requirements many of the trees will be removed. The applicant is currently proposing landscaping that exceeds the requirements for the development. The applicant is providing landscape buffering along the southern property line. The applicant is also currently proposing landscaping between the proposed commercial lot and properties to the east. Screening will continue to be reviewed as part of the Commercial Site Plan process. At this time it is possible the berm as shown along Bluebird and the Commercial parcel may have to be removed due to storm water requirements related to the round about construction. Utilities Each of the lots will be served by City of Andover municipal water and sewer. Signage: A double -sided, lit monument sign will be located at the entrance to the site off Crosstown. There will also be small unlit signs (approximately 48"W x 60"H) on the property to direct visitors to the appropriate buildings on the site (main senior building vs brownstones vs cottages), including off 150' noting that entrance is for staff, deliveries and authorized visitors only. At the intersection of Crosstown and Hanson, there will either be a combination sign attached to the corner of the building, or an illuminated wall sign located on the building itself. This signage is anticipated to be above 10' tall, but not to exceed 47'. All other signage is expected to meet City Code requirements. Area Identification Sign Standards: Size: Shall not exceed 300-square feet. Height: No taller than the highest outside wall or parapet on the property in which it is 3 located or twenty-five feet, whichever is less. Setbacks: Must be setback at least 10-feet from right-of-way. Location must be identified on preliminary plat or commercial site plan. Neighborhood Business District Sign Standards: Size: The aggregate footage of sign space per lot shall not exceed the sum of three (3) square feet per front foot of building. No single sign shall exceed 100 square feet except for area identification signs (see above). Height: No taller than the highest outside wall or parapet on the property in which it is located or twenty-five feet, whichever is less. Setbacks: Must be setback at least 10-feet from right-of-way. Residential District Sign Standards: Number: One per lot frontage. Size: Residential Uses — 4 square feet per dwelling. Institutional Uses — 32 square feet. Height: No more than ten feet (10') above grade. Signs need to be 10 feet from property lines and outside drainage and utility easements. PUD CRITERIA According to City Code 13-3 Planned Unit Development, the purpose of a PUD is to encourage more efficient allocation of density and intensity of land use where such arrangement is desirable and feasible by providing the means of greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design than provided under strict application of the standards set in code. Attached for your review is City Code 13-3. City Code 13-3-9 regulates the findings that are required for a PUD to be approved and 13-3-11 identifies desirable PUD design standards that are sought in any PUD proposal. As part of the attached PUD narrative, the applicant addresses the design qualities they believe the City seeks when granting a PUD proposal as identified in City Code 13-3-11. City Code 13-3-9 states the following required findings for the Council to consider when approving a PUD: 1. The proposed development is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan for the City. The recent Comprehensive Plan Amendment allows for the proposed uses. 2018 Comprehensive Plan Goals that may be relevant which are found in Chapter 1: Foundation of the Comprehensive Plan (see attachment for additional goals). Overarching Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal 1: Maintain and enhance the quality of life in Andover Land Use Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal: Encourage appropriate economic growth and redevelopment. Goal: Reduce maintenance and energy costs for public facilities and infrastructure. El Housing Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal: Provide a variety of housing types to accommodate the life cycle needs of all residents. Goal: Remain responsive to housing market demands through implementation of the Land Use Plan Transportation Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal: Provide a safe and efficient transportation system that is cost effective and serves the existing and future access and mobility needs of the City. Goal: Minimize impacts of the transportation system on the natural environment. 2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. The applicant is proposing residential uses and one neighborhood commercial lot of 1.5 acres. The applicant has designed the structures in a manner that complements the surrounding residential site context, and is proposing building materials for each component that complements each other. Private drives will be constructed and maintained by the development. Landscaping will be utilized to buffer the development from existing single family homes to the south. The applicant has provided shorter buildings closer to the single family homes. The applicant will utilize density averaging to achieve the overall desired density of over 20 units per acre within the residential development. 3. The proposed development demonstrates how each modified or waived requirement contributes to achieving the purpose of PUD. Each deviation to the requirements will allow for a higher density within the range allowed by the comprehensive plan. The deviations to parking will remain in the range allowed by our surrounding communities. The senior age restriction, coupled with assisted living and memory care units reduces the need for the standard parking requirements. Setback deviations will allow for a campus style development and grounds keeping will be managed through an association. Height deviation allows for a more condensed building footprint. This allows for less impervious surface and shorter interior hallways. A three story pitched roof would have an overall building height of 54 feet. The proposal with a flat roof has an overall height of 49 feet 5 inches. Andover City Code 12-3-5: Minimum District Requirements: B. Maximum Height, allows principal buildings to exceed the height limits imposed by provisions provided it is determined that: a. Adequate fire protection and other safety features are provided. a. The building will be fully sprinkled with an NFPA 13 system, include standpipes at every stairwell and on both sides of any firewall. b. Applicant has coordinated with and will continue to coordinate with Andover Fire on appropriate access for their equipment and appropriate distances. b. The height and bulk of the building will not destroy a scenic or appropriate view, will not shut off light and air from surrounding properties, or otherwise be detrimental to the public. a. A shadow study had been conducted and does cast shadow onto existing homes or current buildings. b. The building uses several stories to minimize massing near residential properties. For example, near existing homes the building is I and 2 stories high. c. The independent, assisted living, memory care building meets or exceed the minimum setbacks for the zoning district. C. In no event, however, shall any building occupy more than the permitted percentage of lot area as provided in this title. a. It does not as the independent, assisted living memory care building occupies 16.2% of its lot and including all buildings and lots the residential buildings occupy 23.4% of the lots area, when 30% is allowed. Lot Area Per Dwelling deviation under current City Code requirements the development would not have a density above 20 units per acre. Under City Code the site would need an additional 4.26 acres, which means the development would have a density of 14.4 units per acre. 4. The PUD is of composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation are feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. This development will provide connections to the public roadways and the applicant shall provide coordinated participation in the construction of a roundabout at Bluebird Street NW and Crosstown Blvd NW location. The applicant will establish an Owners Association for the repair and maintenance of shared items such as private roadways, and landscaping. All residential units will be age restricted. • The City Council will need to determine if the developer's proposal satisfactorily meets these required findings. X PROPOSED PUD STANDARDS The applicant is requesting flexibility in the bulk area standards including size, dimension, and density. The following table depicts the proposed conceptual PUD standards: Proposed Conce tual PUD Standards No. Item City Code City Code Proposed Residential() Proposed Standards: M3 Standards: NB Commercial (NB) 1 ILot Width 150' 150' 150'+ 150'+ 2 Lot Depth 150' 150' 150'+ 1501+ 3 Lot Area 2,150 - 5,000 s.f. 22 500 s.f. 2,430 57 729 per bedroom per bedroom ' 4 Front Yard Setback 40' 40' Exceeds Exceeds 5 Side Yard Setback 30' 10' / 30' 10' Cottages 10' / 30'+ 10' Brownstones 6 Rear Yard Setback 30' 25' 10' Cottages 25' 7 Setback County Road 50' 50' Exceeds NA 8 Max Lot Coverage (structure) 30% 40% Meets Meets 9 Right of Way 60' 60' 60' 60' 10 Parking Stall Width 10, 10, 10' - surface 10' 9'- underground 11 umber of Underground/ 1 per unit N/A 1 TApts.) N/A Gara e Parking Stalls None AL/MC 12 umber of Parking Spaces ) 2.5 per unit (Elderly) 11.5 (Elderly) varies 1.4 per unit 1 per 250 Sq. ft. Shared Access & Private 13 Streets NA Shared Shared 20' — Front 20' — Front 14 Parkin Setbacks g 20'— ROW 20'— ROW Meets Meets 10'— Side int. 10'— Side int. 10' - Rear 10' - Rear 15 Building Height 35' 49' S" (IL/AL/MC) 35' *Red text indicates deviation from City Code Zoning and Lot Standards Lot Area Rezoning has already occurred on the property. The 1.5 acres of Neighborhood Business (NB) and the Multiple Dwelling High Density (M-3) exist today. The subject property includes property zoned NB: Neighborhood Business and property zoned M-3: Multiple Dwelling High Density. City Code requirements for the NB zoning district include a minimum lot size of 22,500 square feet (approximately half an acre) and a minimum lot width of 150 feet measured at the front yard setback line. City Code requirements in the M-3 zoning district include a minimum lot 7 size of 2,150 per 1-bedroom apartment or 5,000 per 2-bedroom apartment, Single Family attached units require 2,100 square feet. Based on the lot sizes for the multifamily dwelling units the applicant is proposing to deviate from the M- 3 standards. The following explains the lot size deviations for the multifamily dwelling units. The City of Andover Comprehensive Plan indicates the area should have a density of 20 to 25 units per acre. As like our last multi -family projects, density is spread over the development. Currently City Code for M-3: Multiple Dwelling requires lot area per unit of 2,150 square feet for a one -bedroom apartment and 5,000 square feet for a two -bedroom unit. The cottage product is considered a single family attached product and requires 2,100 square feet a unit and is not based on bedrooms. The bedroom/unit count is below: Unit Type Cottages Brownstones IL/AL/MC Total Single Family Attached 9 0 0 9 1 Bedroom - - 116 116 2 Bedroom - 32 60 92 Sq. Ft. Per Code 18,900 137,600 549,400 705,900 S . Ft. Provided 92,550 103,384 319,973 515,907 Difference 73,650 -34,216 -229,427 -189,993 Over/Under Per Unit Entire Site -876 Compliance with City Code would only provide a density of 14.4 units per acre which is inconsistent with Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use guidance of 20-25 units per acre, as presented this evening the applicant is providing 2,389 square feet for unit ((116 + 92) units / (515,907-18,900) square feet). Out of the 217 units; 24 units are memory care and 40 are assisted living. The applicants experience with past communities under team ownership and management has found the tenants within these units tend to not utilize the outdoors as an independent living tenant would. Removal of these 64 units within the above counts would provide the site a shortage of 363 square feet per unit. Adherence to City Code with the current 1 and 2 bedroom count would require the residential site areas to be an additional 4.26 acres in size lower the site density to below the 20 units per acre and have a density of 14.4 units per acre vs the expected 20.8 units per acre as Met Council would calculate the density. The applicant believes Senior living is different from Market Rate apartments in the use of outdoor space. Memory Care has its own outdoor space that is self-contained and enclosed by a fence and all activities are guided by employees as this is the only outdoor area that these residents can access. Assisted Living, as well, is mostly organized activities within the facility or on a bus going to another destination. Independent living residents do utilize the outdoor spaces and community facilities. Those can include the YMCA, Community Center, and Parks such as Sunshine. In addition the applicant has extensive spaces within the building that their residents use on a scheduled and open basis. This includes a 7,300 sq. ft Wellness Center with a large lap pool that also includes scheduled aquatic programs such as water aerobics classes and an entire land based work out area with machines tailored to Senior use. This senior campus will also have an indoor Pickle Ball court that can be used by our residents year-round. Side Yard Setback The Proposed Conceptual PUD Standards Chart on page 7 shows the changes to the Side Yard Setback. The proposal is being developed as a "campus" plan and maintenance of the landscaping will be completed by the association. Rear Yard Setback The Proposed Conceptual PUD Standards Chart on page 7 shows the changes to the Rear Yard Setback. The proposal is being developed as a "campus" plan and maintenance of the landscaping will be completed by the association. Parking Stall Width As was found with a past underground parking proposal, staff has been informed that due to structural support locations needed it is more efficient use of space to utilize 9 foot parking stalls between supports. The applicant is requesting that they are also allowed to utilize a 9 foot parking stall width for the underground parking. Number of Underground/Garage Parking Stalls Parking Commercial Parking for Commercial varies depending on the use within the structure. Currently the applicant is providing 1 parking stall per 250 square feet. Parking is reviewed in commercial areas as each use obtains a permit for the building. While City Code 12-14-8 OFF STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS provides a list of uses and parking ratios, some examples are provided below: 1. Office buildings and professional Offices Retail sales and service business with 50 percent or more of gross floor area devoted to storage, warehouses and/or industry 1 space for each 250 square feet of floor area or fraction thereof, but not less than 3 spaces per lot design 8 spaces or 1 space for each 200 square feet devoted to public sales or service, plus 1 additional space for each 500 square feet of storage area; or at least 8 spaces or 1 additional space for each employee on the maximum shift, whichever is greater Shopping centers: 1. Basic requirement: a. Small centers — 400,000 square 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of feet or less of gross leasable floor GLA or portion thereof area (GLA) Cottages The Cottages are providing for a 1 stall or two stall garage and space to park in the driveway. This would meet the requirement of having at minimum of two parking locations. Brownstones & IL/AL/MC BuildiM This particular projects units will be age restricted to 55+ in age. According to the applicant the actual 0 age of residents living in the brownstones is about 75 and the Independent Living is seeing an average age of 83. The brownstones are proposed with 32 units. The applicant is providing 48 underground stalls and 38 surface stalls. This provides a ratio of 2.6 per unit. At this time City Staff would conclude that the Assisted Living and Memory Care Facility would be considered "Elderly (Senior citizen housing) and would require Preservation of 1 space per unit but only''/z would need to be constructed with showing an area for the other half as "proof of parking". The proposal includes 60 units under this category. Elderly (senior citizen) housing Reservation of area equal to 1 space per unit. Initial development is, however, required only'/z space per unit, and said number of spaces can continue until such time as the City Council considers a need for additional parking spaces has been demonstrated IL/AL/MC: Currently City Code would require 2.5 parking stalls per an apartment unit. The applicant is proposing 81 surface parking stalls and 111 underground parking stalls. This provides a 1.1 parking per unit or with memory care and assisted living excluded, provides 1.7 parking spaces per unit. Again this is an age restricted development (55+) that will have access to additional parking at the brownstones. The applicant has indicated based on past experiences that the average age of tenants in this building will be 83 years old. Residential, multiple -family dwellings 2 spaces per unit, at least 1 of which spaces shall be in an enclosed garage, plus t/2 space per unit for visitors' parking The apartment building is proposing 9 foot wide stalls in the underground parking area. This allows the parking to fit within the structural design. The 9' will be free of columns or structure within the stalls. A nine foot stall width is common among many communities. With an age restriction of 55+ years or older over all residential units the applicant is proposing a parking ratio of 1.4 stalls to a unit spread over the Brownstones, IL/AL/MC units. This appears to fall between the parking range of existing age restricted (55+) buildings in Andover. Other 55+ Buildings in Andover Arbor Oaks (IL/AL/MC) — 42 constructed — .6 parking space per unit 24 proof of parking - .9 parking space per unit The Farmstead (IL/AL/MC) — 1 parking space per unit Andover Senior Campus (IL/AL/MC) —1.4 stalls per unit Estates at Arbor Oaks — 1.5 parking space per unit Shared Access & Private Streets Shared access and private streets allows for a more dense and unified development. The private streets will remain under ownership of the property owners and the association will maintain the roadways into the future. 10 Building Height The maximum height allowed in the M-3 is 35 feet. As part of the 4 story building will have a roof structure at 47'-2". Overall with the 2 to 3 foot parapet the building will be 49'-5" from grade, overall height. If the building had a 3 story pitched roof the overall height of the building would be 54' from grade. As noted with the last apartment building in Andover (Aurora Vista) today's apartment buildings have been constructed with 9'-0" ceiling vs a traditional 8"-0" ceiling heights to meet market demands and increase living experience. The applicants are proposing 9' ceiling heights on residential floors two and three. On the first and fourth floors, ceiling heights will be 10'-0" in order to accommodate mechanical systems in soffits while maintaining the higher ceiling heights. The building will have required fire suppression system internally, fire access lanes onsite and standpipes will be located in stairwells and on both sides of firewalls. Height deviation allows for a more condensed building footprint. This allows for less impervious surface and shorter interior hallways. A three story pitched roof would have an overall building height of 54 feet. The proposal with a flat roof has an overall height of 49 feet 5 inches. Andover City Code 12-3-5: Minimum District Requirements: B. Maximum Height, allows principal buildings to exceed the height limits imposed by provisions provided it is determined that: a. Adequate fire protection and other safety features are provided. i. The building will be fully sprinkled with an NFPA 13 system, include standpipes at every stairwell and on both sides of any firewall. ii. Applicant has coordinated with and will continue to coordinate with Andover Fire on appropriate access for their equipment and appropriate distances. iii. b. The height and bulk of the building will not destroy a scenic or appropriate view, will not shut off light and air from surrounding properties, or otherwise be detrimental to the public. i. A shadow study had been conducted and does cast shadow onto existing homes 11 or current buildings. ii. The building uses several stories to minimize massing near residential properties. For example, near existing homes the building is 1 and 2 stories high. iii. The independent, assisted living, memory care building meets or exceed the minimum setbacks for the zoning district. C. In no event, however, shall any building occupy more than the permitted percentage of lot area as provided in this title. i. It does not as the independent, assisted living memory care building occupies 16.2% of its lot and including all buildings and lots the residential buildings occupy 23.4% of the lots area, when 30% is allowed. Other Standards With a PUD all standards apply as typical, unless otherwise specified in the PUD request. The applicant is asking for deviations from the minimum standards as noted above. All other regulations will still apply at time of development. This PUD will still require the Preliminary Plat process (next agenda item), commercial site plan process (internal review) and amendment to the PUD for future phases of this development. Amendments may arise, in the future that the Planning and Zoning Commission, and City Council would have to approve. The development is proposed to be phased into the future based on product type with the IL/AL/MC being constructed first. Amendments to the PUD will be required as each product is brought to development. Applicant(s) at that time may ask for items or may request a change to architecture etc, as part of the PUD Amendment process. Owners Association The applicant will have an owners association with the seller as the declarant in the association documents. Park and Recreation Commission Review The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the request on March 21, 2024. Staff will provide an update on the direction of the Park and Recreation Commission at the meeting on March 26, 2024. PLANNING COMMISSION REQUESTED ACTION After taking public testimony at the Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing, the Planning Commission is asked to make a recommendation to the City Council for their consideration on April 2, 2024. Respe y sub ' , Joe Ja ish Community Development Director Attachments Draft Resolution of Approval .14 Draft Resolution of Denial .18 2018 Comprehensive Plan Goals .20 City Code 13-3 Planned Unit Development .32 Applicants Narrative .36 Staff Comments. .48 12 Chapter 11 Neighborhood Business Uses Building Height Comparison. Brownstones Elevations. Cottages Elevations Commercial Elevations . IL/AL/MC Elevations Overall PUD Site Plan . Preliminary Plat Plan Sheet Cc: SilverCrest Development, LLC (Via Email) J.A. Wedum Foundation (Via Email) Kaas Wilson Architects (Via Email) .55 .58 .59 .60 .61 .62 .71 .72 13 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONDITION USE PERMIT / PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REQUESTED BY J.A. WEDUM FOUNDATION, PRESENTED AS ANDOVER SENIOR CAMPUS, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: PIDs: 23-32-24-32-0006 and 23-32-24-33-0002, legally described as follows: Parcel A: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south and east of County Road 18, also known as Crosstown Blvd.; except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Winslow Hills 2nd Addition and Winslow Hills 3rd Addition. Parcel B: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, JA Wedum Foundation has requested a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Andover Senior Campus, and; WHEREAS, JA Wedum Foundation is proposing a senior campus development that will be age restricted, and; WHEREAS, Age restricted developments have different demands on public/private systems, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request does meet the criteria of City Code and would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, general welfare, values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area, and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request does meet the criteria of City Code and 13-3-9; as the proposed PUD is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan for the City; and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council the approval of the Conditional Use Permit / Planned Unit Development request, and; WHEREAS, the City Council of Andover has reviewed the request and has determined that said request does meet the criteria of City Code and 13-3-9 because: 1. The proposed development is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan for the City. The recent Comprehensive Plan Amendment allows for the proposed land uses. 2018 Comprehensive Plan Goals that may be relevant which are found in Chapter 1: Foundation of the Comprehensive Plan (see attachment for additional goals). 14 Overarching Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal 1: Maintain and enhance the quality of life in Andover Land Use Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal: Encourage appropriate economic growth and redevelopment. Goal: Reduce maintenance and energy costs for public facilities and infrastructure. Housing Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal: Provide a variety of housing types to accommodate the life cycle needs of all residents. Goal: Remain responsive to housing market demands through implementation of the Land Use Plan Transportation Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal: Provide a safe and efficient transportation system that is cost effective and serves the existing and future access and mobility needs of the City. Goal: Minimize impacts of the transportation system on the natural environment. 2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. The applicant is proposing residential uses and one neighborhood commercial lot of 1.5 acres. The applicant has designed the structures in a manner that complements the surrounding residential site context, and is proposing building materials for each component that complements each other. Private drives will be constructed and maintained by the development. Landscaping will be utilized to buffer the development from existing single family homes to the south. The applicant has provided shorter buildings closer to the single family homes. The applicant will utilize density averaging to achieve the overall desired density of over 20 units per acre within the residential development. 3. The proposed development demonstrates how each modified or waived requirement contributes to achieving the purpose of PUD. Each deviation to the requirements will allow for a higher density within the range allowed by the comprehensive plan. The deviations to parking will remain in the range allowed by our surrounding communities. The senior age restriction, coupled with assisted living and memory care units reduces the need for the standard parking requirements. Setback deviations will allow for a campus style development and grounds keeping will be managed through an association. Height deviation allows for a more condensed building footprint. This allows for less impervious surface and shorter interior hallways. A three story pitched roof would have an overall building height of 54 feet. The proposal with a flat roof has an overall height of 49 feet 5 inches. Andover City Code 12-3-5: Minimum District Requirements: B. Maximum Height, allows principal buildings to exceed the height limits imposed by 15 provisions provided it is determined that: d. Adequate fire protection and other safety features are provided. a. The building will be fully sprinkled with an NFPA 13 system, include standpipes at every stairwell and on both sides of any firewall. b. Applicant has coordinated with and will continue to coordinate with Andover Fire on appropriate access for their equipment and appropriate distances. e. The height and bulk of the building will not destroy a scenic or appropriate view, will not shut off light and air from surrounding properties, or otherwise be detrimental to the public. c. A shadow study had been conducted and does cast shadow onto existing homes or current buildings. d. The building uses several stories to minimize massing near residential properties. For example, near existing homes the building is I and 2 stories high. e. The independent, assisted living, memory care building meets or exceed the minimum setbacks for the zoning district. f. In no event, however, shall any building occupy more than the permitted percentage of lot area as provided in this title. f. It does not as the independent, assisted living memory care building occupies 16.2% of its lot and including all buildings and lots the residential buildings occupy 23.4% of the lots area, when 30% is allowed. 4. The PUD is of composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation are feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. This development will provide connections to the public roadways and the applicant shall provide coordinated participation in the construction of a roundabout at Bluebird Street NW and Crosstown Blvd NW location. The applicant will establish an Owners Association for the repair and maintenance of shared items such as private roadways, and landscaping. All residential units will be age restricted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover does hereby approve the Conditional Use Permit/ Planned Unit Development for Andover Crossings on the above legally described property with the following conditions: 1. Residential units shall be restricted to seniors (55 or older). 2. Applicant shall address all staff comments and outside agency comments related to the Preliminary Plat, Commercial Site Plans, and all applicable permits to the satisfaction of the City. 3. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from appropriate agencies. 4. Upon approval of Andover Senior Campus Preliminary Plat, it shall be incorporated into the PUD. 5. This PUD is contingent upon approval of the Andover Senior Campus Preliminary Plat approval. 6. The following deviations shall be permitted within the PUD, any items not addressed within this resolution shall adhere to City Code: 16 Proposed Conceptual PL-D Standards No. Item Cite Code Cin Code Proposed Residential proposed Standards: \I3 Standards: \B (:NI-3) Commercial B 1 Lot Width 150' 150, 150'+ 1501t Lot Depth 150' 1�0' 1501— 150'- 3 , ,: 2,1 22,500 2,430 57,729 per bedroom bedroom 4 Front Yard Setback 40 40' Exceeds Exceeds 5 ride Yard Setback 30' 10' / 30' 1 ' o` �es 10' / 30'+ 10 6 Rear Yard Setback 10' - I Cottage_ )5' 7 Setback County Road 50' 50, Exceeds NA 8 Max LotC'overage 300o 4000 Meets 1\deeU I. itfllCiLlre} 9 Right of Wav 60' 60' 60' 60' l0 1 '�ild6u 10 10 10' - surface 10' 9'- underground it umber of Underground/I 1 Pa twit N/A per unit (Apts.) �A e P Stalls None ALAK 12 Nurnber of Parkme'paces 2.5 per trait (Apts. '.5 (Elderly) 1 s.�1e` }per unit 1 per 250 Sq. ft. Shared Access & Private 13 Streets NA NA Shared Shared 20' — Front 20' — Front 14 Parking Setbacks 20'—ROW 20'—ROW Xteets Meets 10' — Side int. 10' — Side int. 10' - Rear 10' - Rear 15 Wldin He ht 35' 35' 49' 5" (IL/AL/MC) 35' 7. The applicant shall provide coordinated participation in the construction of a roundabout at Bluebird Street NW and Crosstown Blvd NW location. 8. All lots shall follow and adhere the Commercial Site Plan process and review, and city comments related to said review shall be appropriately addressed. 9. Future phases will require an amendment to this PUD. 10. If the City Council determines that no significant progress has been made in the first twelve (12) months after the approval of this resolution, the PUD, will be null and void. 11. An Owners Association is created. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 2nd day of April, 2024. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Michelle Hartner, City Clerk Sheri Bukkila, Mayor 17 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R A RESOLUTION DENYING THE CONDITION USE PERMIT / PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REQUESTED BY J.A. WEDUM FOUNDATION, PRESENTED AS ANDOVER SENIOR CAMPUS, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: PIDs: 23-32-24-32-0006 and 23-32-24-33-0002, legally described as follows: Parcel A: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south and east of County Road 18, also known as Crosstown Blvd.; except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Winslow Hills 2°`j Addition and Winslow Hills 3rd Addition. Parcel B: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, JA WEDUM FOUNDATION has requested a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Andover Senior Campus, and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request does not meet the criteria of City Code and would have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, general welfare, values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area, and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and determined that said request does not meet the criteria of City Code and 13-3-9; as the proposed PUD is in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan for the City; the proposed development is not designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries; and the proposed development does not demonstrate how each modified or waived requirement contributes to achieving the purpose of a PUD; the PUD is not of composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation are feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit, and: WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council the denial of the Conditional Use Pernut/Planned Unit Development request, and; WHEREAS, the City Council of Andover has reviewed the request and has determined that said request does not meet the criteria of City Code and 13-3-9 because: 1. 2. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover does hereby deny the Conditional Use Permit on the above legally described property for a Planned Unit Development for Andover Senior Campus due to the following findings: 1. 2. 3. IR Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 2❑d day of April, 2024. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Michelle Hartner, City Clerk Sheri Bukkila, Mayor 9CN6MROP� _ 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update 1-3 Goals, Objectives and Policies The following pages describe the goals of the community and the strategies that are employed to achieve them. The goals, objectives and policies are structured according to the topic that they address. However, it is important to remember that these statements are interrelated. As a result, the cause and effect for each topic must be considered when decisions concerning the Comprehensive Plan are made. For the purposes of this plan these terms are defined as follows: Goal: A statement that expresses a desired outcome or state of affairs. Objective: A statement that provides direction on how the goal will be achieved Policy: A specific action that will be taken or a general rule that will be applied to a specific situation Overarching Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal 1: Maintain and enhance the quality of life in Andover Objective: Efficiently provide basic services to improve all aspects of the city that contribute to quality of life including land use, public safety, transportation, recreation, health, education, and resource preservation Policy: Prepare, implement, periodically evaluate and update local controls such as: • Comprehensive Plan • City Code • Capital Improvement Plan • Water Resource Management Plan • Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program • Parks and Open Space Plan Objective: Preserve the rural character of the community Policies: • Preserve the Rural Residential Planning Area Designation Identified by the Metropolitan Council 2040 Regional Development Framework • Plan the efficient expansion of municipal sewer and water through implementation of the Land Use Plan • Preserve natural areas through implementation of the Parks and Open Space Plan 20 Akb-W-^2018 Comprehensive Plan Update 1-4 Goal 2: Maintain a high degree of community planning and involvement Objective: Ensure an open and accessible local government that is responsive to the needs of residents Policies: • Provide access to information in a variety of forms including the newsletter, official newspaper, web site and televised meetings • Maintain healthy relationships with residents, businesses, community groups, school districts, and government agencies to ensure all points of view are represented • Promote participation in citizen advisory committees • Consider all available information and the potential impacts on all aspects of the community when making land use decisions • Maintain a mix of land uses, including schools, professional and medical office, retail, community and park facilities to provide a vital node of activity in the vicinity of City Hall, as well as along major corridors • Encourage resident involvement through the public hearing process and utilize a variety of public hearing notification methods including direct mailing, publication in the official newspaper and signs placed on subject properties Goal 3: Maintain the Comprehensive Plan as a relevant official document Objective: Consider Comprehensive Plan amendments that better achieve the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan Policies: • Adhere to the goals, objectives and policies of this Comprehensive Plan to prevent incremental decision making that adversely affects the intent of the plan • Review Comprehensive Plan text amendments with the following criteria: o A public need for the proposed amendment can be identified o The proposed amendment is the best way to satisfy that need o The amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan 2� ANLM-A 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update 1-5 o The amendment is in the best interest of the City of Andover as determined by the City Council Review Comprehensive Plan amendments concerning a proposed land use change with the following criteria: o Conditions have changed since the present land use designation was established such to warrant the proposed amendment or the present land use designation is in error o The proposed land use is compatible with surrounding land uses and with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan o There is capacity of public systems, facilities and services to serve the proposed land use and capacity of these systems to serve other planned land uses is not adversely affected o Agreement can be reached for the applicant of the proposed land use to pay for any increased capacity of public systems, facilities and services required to serve the proposed land use o Potential impacts by the proposed land use on natural resources including vegetation, wetlands, floodplain and other natural features can be avoided or sufficiently mitigated as determined by the City Council o To ensure a transition or buffer between urban and rural residential zoning districts Land Use Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal 4: Allow residential growth while maintaining the quality of natural resources and amenities Objective: Clearly define areas for urban and rural residential development Objective: Promote orderly growth to ensure efficient utilization and delivery of community services Objective: Prevent extension of infrastructure that is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan Objective: Work cooperatively with resource protection agencies and organizations to minimize the impact of development on natural resources and amenities Objective: Create opportunities for the city to preserve open space, nature preserves and natural amenities through review of development proposals and implementation of the Parks and Open Space Plan 22 AN61�� _ 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update 1-6 Policies: • Maintain a Municipal Urban Service Area (MUSA) Boundary to define the boundary between the Developing Community and Rural Residential planning area designations of the 2040 Regional Development Framework • Stage urban development within the MUSA Boundary to ensure orderly growth and cost-efficient expansion of infrastructure • Review and update the staging plan periodically to address changes in times and conditions • Prohibit platting of property without municipal sewer and water within the MUSA Boundary; except for properties that cannot be feasibly developed at an urban capacity. • Restrict lot splits without municipal sewer and water within the MUSA Boundary • Encourage infill development within the MUSA Boundary with appropriate transitions to existing neighborhoods • Allow rural development outside of the MUSA Boundary consistent with the Rural Residential Land Use Designation • Require existing conditions information to be provided during the development review process to allow evaluation of opportunities to preserve and protect natural features and open space • Engage local watershed management organizations and other appropriate agencies and organizations in the review of development proposals Goal 5: Encourage appropriate economic growth and redevelopment Objective: Develop a diversified tax base through balanced development of commercial, light industrial, and residential properties Objective: Create cohesive vibrant retail hubs to serve the community by aggregating commercial land uses along Bunker Lake Boulevard Objective: Select strategic locations for neighborhood and community commercial sites and establish design performance standards for such uses that promote quality site design and compatible land use arrangements Objective: Prevent the intensification of neighborhood commercial areas that may negatively affect surrounding residential properties Z3 Akb-VWA- 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update 1-7 Policies: • Maintain the existing commercial nodes along Hanson Boulevard, Bunker Lake Boulevard, Round Lake Boulevard, Crosstown Drive and 7th Avenue as cohesive, interrelated nodes of commercial activity • Prevent fragmented, uncoordinated and linear commercial development away from these locations • Provide limited opportunities for commercial development in other areas of the city only when demand is demonstrated with a professionally prepared market study • Ensure that new development and redevelopment has a positive impact on the community by providing appropriate transitions and demonstrating compliance with the City Code • Promote redevelopment of existing industrial zones to accommodate industrial development, enhance community appearance and tax base • Allow limited industrial development within Andover Station North when the use, site design, and building architecture are compatible with the existing and planned uses within this commercial center • Encourage continued investment in the Andover North regional shopping area Goal: Protect and develop access for alternative energy systems Objective: Preserve reasonable access to all parcels so that alternative forms of energy can be used to supplement or replace conventional forms of energy Policies: • Encourage and support educational programs and research that focuses on alternative or renewable energy systems such as offered by Metro Cities, University of Minnesota Extension Services, Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance, Anoka County and other organizations • Encourage the possible use of solar energy in future housing developments • Encourage future site and building plans to design for efficient use of solar energy including such elements as the location of windows, shade trees, and driveways Goal: Reduce maintenance and energy costs for public facilities and infrastructure 2q ANL66W2018 Comprehensive Plan Update 1-8 Objective: Where feasible, use low energy design elements for future public facilities and infrastructure development Policy: • Explore alternative energy sources when replacing systems in public facilities Housing Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal: Provide a variety of housing types to accommodate the life cycle needs of all residents Goal: Remain responsive to housing market demands through implementation of the Land Use Plan Objective: Utilize the existing housing stock to provide a portion of the affordable housing demand projected by the Metropolitan Council Objective: Utilize local controls to provide opportunities for a variety of housing types, including affordable housing Objective: Continue to work with agencies that provide affordable housing and housing for residents with special needs Policies: • Work with property owners to identify sources of funding for home improvements to prevent deterioration of the city's older homes • Support Anoka County's efforts to implement the Five -Year Consolidated Plan • Utilize the planned unit development review process for medium and high -density residential projects to encourage more efficient allocation of density and intensity of land use and get higher quality development while providing amenities not otherwise achievable with existing zoning classes. • Support public service agency applications for the Community Development Block Grant Program L5 Akb—W-^ 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update 1-9 Transportation Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal: Provide a safe and efficient transportation system that is cost effective and serves the existing and future access and mobility needs of the City Objective: Ensure adequate internal and external transportation access and links for efficient movement of people and goods Objective: Provide a transportation system that enhances quality economic development within the City Objective: Provide a transportation system that meets the varied needs of Andover residents Objective: Consider the mobility needs of all persons in the planning and development of the transportation system Objective: Continue to support Anoka County Transportation Department applications for safety improvements of roadways Policies: • Provide for early and continuing citizen involvement in transportation planning and implementation of projects • Provide a roadway system within a functional hierarchy that accommodates existing and future travel demands by providing the necessary design features to satisfy the roadway's intended use • Provide sufficient roadway capacity through the construction of transportation system improvements that accommodate existing and future demand • Require construction of transportation system improvements in conjunction with new developments when the need is created by the new development • Require payment for future transportation improvements as a part of development approval proportionate to the demand created by new developments • Ensure that all components of the transportation system are maintained and developed to the highest standards to insure against detrimental impact upon community growth • Utilize the Capital Improvement Plan to schedule projects that increase public safety by minimizing hazards and correcting poorly designed intersections and access points 2Cc; I 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update 1 - 10 ANLb6qRJ P P Goal: Provide a coordinated transportation system that is compatible with adjacent municipality, Anoka County, Metropolitan Council and State of Minnesota transportation plans Objective: Coordinate transportation planning and transportation system improvements with other government agencies to increase efficiencies Objective: Increase opportunities for funding of local transportation system improvements from federal, state and county funding sources Policies: • Coordinate grant applications and other funding requests, when appropriate, with neighboring municipalities, as well as state, regional and county agencies • Coordinate participation of Anoka County and adjacent cities, where appropriate, in the provision of Transportation Plan elements Goal: Provide multi -modal transportation options whenever and wherever feasible and advantageous Objective: Periodically evaluate potential ridership and feasibility of joining the Metropolitan Transit Taxing District to provide additional transit options for Andover residents Policies: • Identify locations for park and ride facilities and preserve the ability to implement these facilities in the future • Promote ridesharing and increased vehicle occupancies throughout the City Goal: Minimize impacts of the transportation system on the natural environment Objective: Ensure environmentally sensitive implementation of the transportation system through the planning, design and construction of improvements Objective: Consider the impacts of improvements to the existing transportation system on land use, environmental, social, historic, and cultural resources 2-7 ANLMAYOP` 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update Policies: • Adhere to best management practices and all components of the Implementation Plan during the planning, construction and maintenance of the transportation system • Separate non -motorized traffic from arterial and collector roadways • Encourage joint parking facilities to conserve land Goal: Enhance accessibility by providing an interconnected multi- use trail system Objective: Provide an accessible trail system that links residential neighborhoods, commercial developments, and park areas Objective: Utilize multiple funding sources to complete the regional and local trail systems Objective: Coordinate trail construction with street improvement projects, new development, expansion and redevelopment projects Policies: • Maintain a map of existing and future local and regional trails and coordinate trail planning, construction and maintenance in the Capital Improvement Plan • Fund regional trail system improvements adjacent to residential properties with trail fees collected from new residential developments • Require regional trail construction adjacent to commercial and industrial properties, where shown on the trails plan, in conjunction with development, expansion and redevelopment projects • Require local trail construction adjacent to residential, commercial and industrial properties, where shown on the trails plan, in conjunction with development, expansion and redevelopment projects • Develop trails in accordance with the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards • Coordinate trail and sidewalk improvements, where appropriate, with Anoka County and neighboring cities 28 ANLbbq^ 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources Goals, Objectives and Policies 1-12 These goals, objectives and policies are included within the City of Andover Water Resource Management Plan and Water Supply Plan. These are separate documents that have been adopted as a component of the Comprehensive Plan. Parks and Open Space Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal 1: Provide parks and facilities that meet present park needs and plan for the future needs of the city Objectives: a. Maintain and upgrade current park facilities b. Evaluate existing conditions and future growth projections to determine the types of parks and facilities needed to complete the park system C. Provide more passive recreation opportunities d. Provide for a balance among active and passive recreation areas and activities e. Provide recreation facilities for all age groups and abilities within the city f. Design and maintain recreation areas with appropriate lighting, landscaping, parking, and shelter design g. Consider the Site Selection Criteria established in the Parks and Open Space Plan and the standards of the National Recreation and Park Association in the planning and design of the park system Policies: • Implement a maintenance schedule for the grounds and facilities within the current park system • Aggregate resources from local, state and federal sources to complete planned improvements as scheduled in the Capital Improvement Plan • Maintain and Update the Park Study as a guide for the number, size, type and location of parks and facilities needed to complete the park system to serve the needs of residents Zq Ax�_b_w2018 Comprehensive Plan Update 1 - 13 • Accept only lands suitable for park and recreation purposes as fulfillment of the parkland dedication requirements. • Utilize the Capital Improvement Plan to schedule replacement of existing park facilities and installation of new facilities • Utilize the Park and Recreation Commission to advise the Council on matters relating to parks, recreation and park facilities • Provide regulations and policies for park use and park dedication • Consider the adopted Guidelines for Field Usage by Youth Athletic Associations • Work cooperatively with other organizations and government agencies to enhance local and regional park systems Goal 2: Promote, protect, preserve and enhance the City's natural resources and open space for the enjoyment of residents, protection of water and air quality and the preservation of wildlife habitat Objective: Consider development of passive, nature -related recreation or conservancy areas on sites found to be suitable for these purposes Objective: Identify appropriate areas for preservation through analysis of natural features, the Site Selection Criteria established in the Parks and Open Space Plan and the Land Use Plan Objective: Plan for and provide connections with the park and trail systems in a manner that both preserves and allows public enjoyment of natural areas Objective: Seek to provide buffer areas adjacent to significant natural resources and parks Policies: • Work collaboratively with property owners in the preservation of open space • Permanently protect open space with conservation easements, even when fee title acquisition and other methods are used • Prepare, implement and monitor the effectiveness of conservation plans that address the specific characteristics of the various types of natural areas • Utilize the Open Space Advisory Commission to advise the Council on matters concerning preservation of open space 30 AN�66W _ 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update 1 - 14 • Prevent incompatible land uses from locating adjacent to parks and open space areas through implementation of the Land Use Plan and zoning regulations • Work cooperatively with other organizations and government agencies to acquire and enhance open space areas within the city • Recognize preservation of nature preserves and open space as a benefit in Planned Unit Developments 3r CHAPTER 3 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) SECTION: 13-3-1: Purpose 13-3-2: Utilization of PUD 13-3-3: PUD Concept Review 13-3-4: Uses 13-3-5: Density 13-3-6: Zoning And Subdivision Standards And Requirements 13-3-7: Approval Process 13-3-8: Fees And Costs 13-3-9: Findings Required 13-3-10: Revisions And Amendments 13-3-11: Desirable PUD Design Qualities 13-3-12: Approval Of Planned Unit Development 13-3-1: PURPOSE: The purpose of a PUD is to encourage more efficient allocation of density and intensity of land use where such arrangement is desirable and feasible by providing the means for greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design than provided under the strict application of this code. It must be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City Council that a higher quality development will result than could be otherwise achieved through strict application of this code. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004) 13-3-2: UTILIZATION OF PUD: Planned Unit Development (PUD) regulations may be allowed by the City Council to be applied and/or utilized for all developments including the following: townhomes, single- and two-family homes (both urban and rural), apartment projects, multiuse structures, commercial developments, industrial developments, mixed residential and commercial developments and similar projects. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004) 13-3-3: PUD CONCEPT REVIEW: Any person or persons who may apply for a PUD may request a concept review with respect to land which may be subject to a PUD. The purpose of a PUD concept review is to afford such persons an opportunity, without incurring substantial expense, to have the general feasibility of a PUD proposal considered. PUD concept reviews shall follow the sketch plan procedures provided in Section 11-2-1 of this code. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004) 13-3-4: USES: Planned Unit Developments shall be required to conform to the permitted and conditional uses set forth in Title 12 of this code pertaining to the applicable zoning district. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004) 3Z 13-3-5: DENSITY: The density of residential developments shall be required to conform to the applicable land use district. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004) 13-3-6: ZONING AND SUBDIVISION STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS: All standards and provisions relating to an original zoning district shall apply, unless otherwise approved as a part of the PUD. All standards may be modified or waived provided the applicant demonstrates harmony with the purpose of the PUD and the findings described in Section 13-3- 9 of this chapter. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004) 13-3-7: APPROVAL PROCESS: An applicant for a PUD shall submit in the application all of the material required by this chapter. Each PUD requested must adhere to the following process: A. Permitted and conditional uses shall follow the Conditional Use Permit procedures provided in Section 12-14-6 of this code to establish the development standards for the PUD. These uses shall also complete the commercial site plan process once the Planned Unit Development has been approved. (Amd. 2/20/07, Ord. 341) B. Applications involving the subdivision of land shall complete a preliminary and final plat under the procedures provided in Title 11, "Subdivision Regulations", of this code. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004) 13-3-8: FEES AND COSTS: Applications for a PUD shall be filed at the office of the City Planner along with a nonrefundable application fee for the approval process specified in Sections 13-3-3 and 13-3-7 of this chapter in the amount established by the City Council to defray administrative costs. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004) 13-3-9: FINDINGS REQUIRED: In order for a PUD to be approved, the City shall find that the following are present: A. The proposed development is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan of the city. B. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The proposed development demonstrates how each modified or waived requirement contributes to achieving the purpose of a PUD. D. The PUD is of composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation are feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. (Ord. 298, 84-2004) 33 13-3-10: REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS: Administrative approval of incidental changes in the PUD may be authorized by the City Planner upon review and approval by ARC. Such administrative approvals shall not substantially alter the character of the approved PUD and shall be limited to landscaping (not including quantity reduction), color schemes (not including materials), association documents, fencing, entrance monuments and decks. Changes in uses or development/design standards must be submitted for a full public hearing review process. (Amended Ord. 314, 10-4-2005) 13-3-11: DESIRABLE PUD DESIGN QUALITIES: The following design qualities will be sought in any PUD: A. Achieves efficiency in the provision of streets and utilities and preserves area to achieve the elements of design qualities described in this chapter. B. Provides convenient and safe access for vehicles and pedestrians and all types of activity that are anticipated to be a part of the proposed development. C. Provides a buffer between different uses, adjacent properties, roadways, between backyards of back-to-back lots. D. Preserves existing stands of trees and/or significant trees. E. Provides considerable landscaping treatments that complement the overall design and contribute toward an overall landscaping theme. F. Preserves significant usable space on individual lots or through the provision of open space within the development. G. Provides an attractive streetscape through the use of undulating topography, landscaping, decorative street lighting, decorative mailbox groupings, retaining walls, boulders, fencing, area identification signs, etc. H. The proposed structures within the development demonstrate quality architectural design and the use of high quality building materials for unique design and detailing. I. The lasting quality of the development will be ensured by design, maintenance and use guidelines established through an owners' association. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004) 13-3-12: APPROVAL OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: The developer must demonstrate that the amenities and qualities of the Planned Unit V Development are beneficial and in the public interest to allow the development to be approved. A substantial amount of the design qualities identified in Section 13-3-11 of this chapter shall be found to be present in order to approve a PUD. The amount of amenities and type of qualities that constitute an acceptable PUD are at the sole discretion of the City Council to determine. (Ord. 298, 8-4-2004) 13:3-13: REDEVELOPMENT PUDs: A property owner may apply for a redevelopment PUD for their property, if the property meets the criteria outlined in this section. Such redevelopment PUDs shall only be used for lot splits. PUDs on all other subdivisions shall follow the normal PUD requirements laid out in this chapter. All provisions of City Code chapter 13-3 shall apply to redevelopment PUDs except for section 13-3-11. A redevelopment PUD may be permitted if the subject property meets the following standards: A. The existing principal structure on the property is at least 30 years old, or does not meet current building codes, or has a blighting effect on the surrounding neighborhood, and will be removed as part of the redevelopment of the property. B. The houses built on the new lots would be similar in size and architectural design to those in the surrounding neighborhood. Architectural plans must be included in the application for a redevelopment PUD and approved by the Council. (Amd. 2/20/07, Ord. 341) 35' Andover Senior Campus TO: Joe Janish I Community Development Director I City of Andover RE: Andover Senior Campus FROM: Jay Portz, J.A. Wedum Foundation Mike Gould, SilverCrest Properties, LLC DATE: February 6, 2024 Legal Description: PIN 23.32.24.32.0006 THAT PR OF NW114 OF SW114 OF SEC 23 TWP 32 RGE 24 LYG SLY OF SLY RIW LINE OF CSAHNO 18, EX PR PLATTED AS WINSL0W HILLS, ALSO EX PRTS PLATTED AS WINSLOW HILLS 2ND ADD & WINSL0W HILLS 3RD ADD PIN 23.32.24.33.0002 SW114 OF SW114 SEC 23 T32 R24; EX PRT PLATTED AS WINSLOW HILLS; ALSO EX RD; SUBJ TO EASE OF REC Overview of Proposed Proiect: J.A. Wedum Foundation and SilverCrest Properties, LLC propose to construct a Senior Campus at the intersection of Hanson Blvd NW and Crosstown Blvd NW. The project will consist of- * 1.5 acres of Neighborhood Commercial, which would allow for approximately a 10,000 square foot commercial building to be constructed. • Two brownstone buildings consisting of 16 units each for a total of 32 units. • 9 slab on grade, single level living, cottages. • 176 units in a single, multi -story building. The building will consist of 110 independent living units, 40 assisted living units, 24 memory care units and 2 guest suites. The residential units for the project will be limited to seniors that are 55 years old or older. Multiple market studies have been conducted showing a large demand for senior housing in Andover and surrounding cities. The location provides convenient access to major arterials, retail and medical facilities that seniors desire when looking for housing. J.A. Wedum Foundation currently has a purchase agreement with the property owner that allows us to obtain the required city approvals for the project. Background of Development Team: J.A. Wedum Foundation: The J.A. Wedum Foundation is a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, formed on January 30, 1959, for the general purpose of using its resources to promote the well-being of mankind. The mission of the J. A. Wedum Foundation is to develop and utilize the resources of the Foundation to help organizations and individuals change and improve people's lives in the spirit of stewardship and generosity exemplified by John A. Wedum, the grandfather, and carried forward by John A. Wedum, the grandson. The principal office of the J.A. Wedum Foundation is located at 2 Carlson Parkway N, Suite 11Page 3(4:1 Andover Senior Campus #335, Plymouth, MN 55447. Wedum is a 501(c)(3) organization as determined by the Internal Revenue Service in November 1963. The Foundation has a long history of dedicating substantial portions of its resources and energy to furthering its varied charitable purposes allowable under its broad charitable charter. A special emphasis has been placed on providing high -quality, reasonably -priced housing for seniors. Other examples of charitable purposes include: making education more accessible to young people by providing scholarships and assisting other non -profits in supporting their charitable purpose. Jay Portz is the Foundation's President and Brian Myres serves as Chairman of the Board. The Foundation currently owns six (6) senior housing properties in Minnesota and Texas totaling over 700 units and 850 residents. The senior properties consist of a mixture of independent living, assisted living and memory care units. Management and health care services at the properties are provided by third party organizations (Silvercrest Properties, Presbyterian Homes and Services, and Great Lakes Management Company) that have substantial experience in their field of expertise. Organizations like Allina Health, The University of Minnesota, The City of Rochester, the Alexandria YMCA, Alexandria Community and Technical College and Knute Nelson have been recipients of major grants from the J.A Wedum Foundation. Since 2010, the Foundation has provided over $21,700,000 in financial support to other non-profit organizations to fulfill those organizations charitable purposes. SilverCrest Properties, LLC: SilverCrest Properties, LLC founded in 1986, by Michael F. Gould who is currently President and CEO, is a privately -owned senior housing management and development company. Through Mr. Gould's strategic vision, SilverCrest has grown into a strong regional provider of senior housing with exceptional service. Today SilverCrest has become a company comprised of over 550 employees and 8 different properties presently under management in two states. SilverCrest prides itself in maintaining a dedicated staff that makes a difference in the lives of the seniors we service by practicing our Core Values of R.E.S.P.E.C.T. which is an acronym that stand for the following: R — Residents First •E — Equity S — Safety and Security P — Professionalism E — Enriching Lives, Energy and Enthusiasm C — Community T — Team Work Through this Residents First mindset, SilverCrest continues to develop and manage "Senior Communities of Excellence" that focuses on our resident's total health through its Wellness Centers in key communities. Kaas Wilson Architects: Kaas Wilson Architects was founded in 2007 to bring a fresh approach to architecture for multifamily housing and senior living. Since then, they strive to create unique designs using a team approach to better understand and create successful environments for living, working, and aging. 2 1 P a g e 3� Andover Senior Campus Land Use: With the recent Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the site is currently guided for Urban Residential High (URH) and a 1.5 acre parcel for Neighborhood Commercial. Re -zoning has also occurred to accommodate the development with the residential portion zoned M-3 Multiple Dwelling High Density and NB -Neighborhood Commercial. Due to the reduction in lot area for the residential, by creating a 1.5 acre commercial lot, we have also proposed increasing the allowed density for the residential to Urban Residential High (URH). The need for the change is due to the total amount of land being reduced, even though today's proposal of 217 residential units contains fewer than what was proposed previously (232 residential units) back in June of 2022. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The development team is focused on delivering: • High quality designed housing to ensure compatibility between residential and commercial uses. • Creating attractive, community -oriented development that positively reflects on the image and identity of Andover. Independent Living/ Assisted Living/Memory Care: The proposed design consists of a 176 residential unit building in varying floors, ranging from 1 story to 4 stories. The 4 story portion of the building will have a flat roof with parapet. The 1 story memory care wing and 2 story assisted living wing will have a pitched roof to blend in with the existing neighborhood and proposed Brownstones on the site. The building will have the following amenities available: • Indoor pickle ball court, bistro, salon, club room, multi -purpose room, golf simulator, crafts room, underground parking, and a wellness center including a warm water pool, group fitness, fitness equipment room and therapy spaces. • Memory Care has studios and lbdrm units, Assisted Living has studios, one bdrm units and two bdrm units and Independent Living has one bdrm, two bdrm and two bdrm + den units. Brownstones: Units in the brownstone buildings will have larger unit sizes consisting of 1 bdrm+den to 2bdrm+den with underground parking. Residents that live in these units would have full access to the amenities within the larger senior living building. Cottages: Units in the single level cottages will consist of either 1 or 2 bedroom units with either a single or double garage. Residents that live in these units would have full access to the amenities within the larger senior living building. Neighborhood Commercial: 1.5 acres is reserved for neighborhood commercial occupancy. A 10,000 sf building pad has been conceptually shown for this portion of the site. Site Design and Placement: Each building for Andover Senior Campus has been oriented on the site for multiple reasons: • Eliminate cast shadows on adjacent structures. • Limit/prevent headlight protrusion on other properties. • Fewer stories adjacent to existing residences. • Provide for pedestrian circulation throughout the site. • Allow for underground parking. Exterior Design: The development and design team are proposing an apartment building with a contemporary upscale look, while complementing the surrounding residential site context; single family homes, Clocktower Commons commercial area, Andover Elementary, and Andover City Hall. 3 1 P a g e ? Andover Senior Campus • The colors chosen draw inspiration from the existing neighborhood homes and nature surrounding the site and city of Andover. We've used subtle color blocking to break up the building and avoid the look of a repetitive building fagade. • Durable materials are used to ensure maintenance free design that should keep it looking new throughout the years and Minnesota weather. • The prefabricated suspended decks will continue the building layers for more depth and visual interest. • The main entrance with port cochere welcomes residents and guests. The front entry incorporates textures and glassy exterior that allows others to see into the building common amenity spaces and encourage them to step inside. This exterior design incorporates materials such as brick, glass, vertical and horizontal lap siding. The use of vertical and lap siding provides a residential feel to the exterior while the brick compliments the tones of siding planned for a timeless expression that mixes traditional design with a twist of modern. Landscape Design: The current development phase landscaping features ornamental accent planting, buffering, native seeding of infiltration basins, and foundation planting that exceeds City minimum quantities. Plant selection for trees, shrubs, and perennials focuses on hardy and durable plant materials that are native and adapted, reasonable to maintain and provide year-round interest. Included in this plant pallet are select specialty plantings for sheltered areas such as the Memory Care Patio, Dining Patio, and Main Entry. Species such as pin cherry and serviceberry are dappled around native seed areas to attract birds for residents to enjoy. Landscape buffering is concentrated at parking areas and adjacent to existing single family residential homes. A combination of deciduous & evergreen shrubs, site walls, and existing trees serve as the buffer between on -site parking and adjacent properties and streets. The SE side of the proposed building is buffered from single-family residential by existing woods and supplemental planting —a combination of evergreen trees and double row of shrubs at the loading area. A higher concentration of trees are proposed in the NW corner of the site to buffer resident views of the Hanson Blvd and Crosstown Blvd intersection. A 4' berm with screening vegetation is proposed between the neighborhood commercial and existing neighborhood to minimize views of the commercial property and provide an attractive visual screen from cars and headlights in the commercial parking lot. Areas that are to be mass graded for future development will be seeded with temporary cover until construction begins. Future phase landscaping will continue a similar plant pallet and buffering strategy to create a cohesive campus. Civil Engineering: As part of the proposed multi -family project, a proposed storm water management system will be constructed to meet the water quality and rate control requirements of the City of Andover, as well as the Coon Creek Watershed District (CCWD). Runoff from the proposed multi -family building and parking lot areas will be directed to four proposed infiltration basin via surface drainage and proposed storm sewer. The proposed infiltration basins are designed to collect and infiltrate the entire runoff volume generated from 1.1-inches of runoff off proposed impervious surfacing (the water quality event). Furthermore, the proposed infiltration basins are designed such that overall proposed site runoff rates do not exceed overall existing site runoff rates from the 24-hour — 2, 10, and 100-year storm events. It should be noted that one proposed infiltration basin (along the north wall) will be regional, and receive runoff from the adjacent street, as well as nearby assisted living facility site. Pre-treatment for the proposed infiltration basins will consist of grass swales, sediment forebays and/or storm sewer sump structures. The proposed infiltration basins will outlet into existing storm sewer in Hanson Blvd, 150" 4 1 P a g e 39 Andover Senior Campus Ln. and Bluebird Street. Proposed private storm sewer is sized to convey runoff from the 24-hour — 10- year storm event. Private sanitary sewer and water service will be provided to all buildings via sanitary and water stubs connected to public sanitary and water main. Hydrants will be included as needed to meet Fire Code. We have been in close contact with Andover Fire on designing the site to accommodate their needs by verifying hydrant placement and providing vehicle access to critical locations. The Commercial Building, Brownstones, and 176-unit building will be required to have fire suppression. Site Coverage and Green Space: The `green space' goal for our apartment community focuses on a design plan that supports its residents, their pets and those actively using Andover's walking paths and public parks. We believe that our design will encourage our residents to fully utilize the apartment green space amenities, as well as city parks and trails. Taking into consideration the site green spaces, the development will include 306,035 sf or 52.6% of green space. Site Area Calculations SF Acres % Code % Site Area * 582,154 13.364 n/a n/a IL/AL/MC 94,561 3.300 16.2% Brownstones 27,200 0.624 4.7% Cottages 14,814 0.340 2.5% Commercial 10,000 0.230 1.7% Parking & Driveway 106,855 2.453 18.4% Sidewalk, Trails & Patios 22,689 0.521 3.9% Landscape 306,035 7.026 52.6% Impervious 276,119 6.339 47.4% * After 25 ft dedication for R/W on Hanson and 60 ft dedication for R/W Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit (Square Feet) Deviation: The lot area per dwelling unit for our development meets the 20 to 25 units per acre within the M-3 zoning district. Currently the comprehensive plan requires a density that is difficult to meet with the Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit requirements. Under City Code requirements, the site is considered to be short per unit by 893 square feet. We are proposing a deviation over the entire site of 893 per unit. Unit Type Cottages Brownstones IL/AL/MC Total Single Family Attached 9 0 0 9 1 Bedroom - - 116 116 2 Bedroom - 32 60 92 S . Ft. Per Code 18,900 137,600 1 549,400 705,900 S . Ft. Provided 92,550 103,384 319,973 515,907 5 1 P a g e 7 Andover Senior Campus Difference 73,650 -34,216 -229,427 -189,993 Over/Under Per Unit Entire Site -876 Out of the 217 units; 24 units are memory care and 40 are assisted living. Our experience with past communities under team ownership and management has found the tenants within these units tend to not utilize the outdoors as an independent living tenant would. Removal of these 64 units within the above counts would provide the site a shortage of 363 square feet per unit. Adherence to City Code with the current 1 and 2 bedroom count would require the residential site areas to be an additional 4.26 acres in size lower the site density to below the 20 units per acre and have a density of 14.4 units per acre vs the expected 20.8 units per acre as Met Council would calculate the density. As we look at the lot area per dwelling unit we feel that Senior living is different from Market Rate apartments in the use of outdoor space. Memory Care has its own outdoor space that is self-contained and enclosed by a fence and all activities are guided by employees as this is the only outdoor area that these residents can access. Assisted Living as well is mostly organized activities within the facility or on our bus going to another destination. Our independent living residents do utilize more of the outdoor spaces and community facilities. Those can include the YMCA, Community Center, and Parks such as Sunshine. In addition we have extensive spaces within the building that our residents use on a scheduled and open basis. This includes an 7,300 sq. ft Wellness Center with a large lap pool that also includes scheduled aquatic programs such as water aerobics classes and an entire land based work out area with machines tailored to Senior use. This senior campus will also have an indoor Pickle Ball court that can be used by our residents year-round. Parking Stall Deviation: Current Andover City Code requires 2.5 parking stalls per unit. We are proposing 125 surface stalls and 159 garage stalls between the main senior living building and brownstones for a total of 284 stalls on site. This is an average of 1.4 parking stalls per unit (total of 208 units on site; 176 main senior living + 32 brownstones). Although the minimum age for this campus is 55+, the actual age of residents living in the brownstones is about 75 and the main senior living is 83. For the commercial portion we are proposing 41 stalls. Andover requires 1 stall per 250sf for office buildings and professional offices, which this commercial building is expected to be, requiring 40 stalls. No parking deviation for the cottages complying with parking regulations for single family homes. SilverCrest has a current community, Summit Place, in Eden Prairie. The campus is one main building with Independent Living, Assisted Living, and Memory Care. The number of units are 170 Independent Living, 63 Assisted Living, and 32 Memory Care for a total of 255 units. The parking at this community is 119 exterior surface parking stalls and 104 indoor garage stalls, which is a 1.3 ratio. Assisted Living and Memory Care residents are not driving and are not using a parking stall. This is the reason we do not run into issues with parking available at our communities and the reason the city of Eden Prairie accepted this ratio. Storage lockers will also be available inside the building for residents to rent for an additional charge. While evaluating the overall site design, we spent significant efforts seeking the optimal balance of the size of the building footprint, achieving pedestrian circulation around the site, beautifying the site landscaping/greenspace, and providing adequate parking to accommodate residents and guests, along with reducing headlights from leaving the property. 61 Page 4�l Andover Senior Campus Below grade parking stall size: Current Andover City Code requires 10'-0" wide x 18'-0" deep parking stalls. Our development is proposing 9'-0" wide x 18'-0" deep parking stalls in the below grade garage due to structural design. The 9' stall width does not include the columns or structure within the stalls. This means the 9' underground stalls will be 9' clear with no obstructions. This size allows us to provide 1 stall for each unit per city code. In our surface parking lot, we will provide code required parking stalls of 10'-0" x 18'-011 . 176-Unit Building Height Deviation: The maximum height allowed in the M-3 Multiple Dwelling District is 35' (proposed zoning district as part of the rezoning request). Our development team is formally requesting a building height deviation from 35'-0" to 47'-2". The 176-unit residential buildng will have a flat roof with a 2'-3" foot parapet (parapets under 4 feet are not counted towards overall building height according to City Code. If the structure was three stories and included a "pitched" roof the overall building height would be 54'. • In today's apartment buildings, it has become common practice to provide 9'-0" ceiling vs traditional 8'-0" ceiling heights to meet market demands and provide an exceptional living experience. We are proposing 9'-0" ceiling heights on residential floors two and three. On first and fourth floors, ceiling will be 10'-0" to accommodate mechanical systems in soffits while maintaining the higher ceiling feel. • We are providing the required fire suppression system internally, as well as fire access lanes on our site. Standpipes will be located in stairwells and on both sides of firewalls. Andover City Code 12-3-5: Minimum District Requirements: B. Maximum Height, allows principal buildings to exceed the height limits imposed by provisions provided it is determined that: a. Adequate fire protection and other safety features are provided. a. The building will be fully sprinkled with an NFPA 13 system, include standpipes at every stairwell and on both sides of any firewall. b. We have been coordinating with Andover Fire on appropriate access for their equipment and appropriate distances. b. The height and bulk of the building will not destroy a scenic or appropriate view, will not shut off light and air from surrounding properties, or otherwise be detrimental to the public. a. A shadow study has been conducted and does cast shadow onto existing homes or buildings. b. The building uses several stories to minimize massing near residential properties. For example, near existing homes the building is 1 and 2 stories high. c. The buildings meet or exceed the minimum setbacks for the zoning district. c. In no event, however, shall any building occupy more than the permitted percentage of lot area as provided in this title. a. It does not. • In the design of our site, we have placed the 176-unit building in order to not cast shadows on other structures. Setbacks Front County Rd * Side* Rear* M3 Std. 40 50 30 30 IL/AL/MC 42.9 57.9 NA 30 Brownstones 40 NA 10 142 Cottages 50 NA 10 10 NB Std. 40 50 30 25 Commercial 78 NA NA 25+ * After 25 ft dedication for R/W on Hanson and 60 ft dedication for R/W 7 1 P a g e L-I z Andover Senior Campus • Our development has 52.6% of green space. Signage: A double -sided, lit monument sign will be located at the entrance to the site off Crosstown. There will also be small unlit signs (approximately 48"W x 60"H) on the property to direct visitors to the appropriate buildings on the site (main senior building vs brownstones vs cottages), including off 150' noting that entrance is for staff, deliveries and authorized visitors only. At the intersection of Crosstown and Hanson, there will either be a combination sign attached to the corner of the building, or an illuminated wall sign located on the building itself. This signage is anticipated to be above 10' tall, but not to exceed 47'. Desirable PUD Design Qualities: A. Achieves efficiency in the provision of streets and utilities and preserves area to achieve the elements of design qualities described in this chapter. Independent Living/ Assisted Living/Memory Care: The proposed design consists of a 176 residential unit building in varying floors, ranging from 1 story to 4 stories. The 4 story portion of the building will have a flat roof with parapet. The 1 story memory care wing and 2 story assisted living wing will have a pitched roof to blend in with the existing neighborhood and proposed Brownstones on the site. The building will have the following amenities available: • Indoor pickle ball court, bistro, salon, club room, multi -purpose room, golf simulator, crafts room, underground parking, and a wellness center including a warm water pool, group fitness, fitness equipment room and therapy spaces. Memory Care has studios and lbdrm units, Assisted Living has studios, one bdrm units and two bdrm units and Independent Living has one bdrm, two bdrm and two bdrm + den units. Brownstones: Two separate brownstones are proposed on the site as a future phase. Each building will consist of 16 units, spread out over two levels with underground parking. Units will be accessed via a central corridor or via an outside entry for 1 st floor units only. The buildings will have limited common area spaces. Cottages: Four cottage style buildings, totaling 9 units, are proposed for a future phase. The single story units will have attached double car garages. Their design will look very single family like and will be a nice transition for the single family along Bluebird to the two story brownstones to the west. Commercial: A single story, 10,000 s,f. commercial building is proposed for a future phase at the corner of Crosstown and Bluebird. This building will likely consist of a day care or medical clinic. B. Provides convenient and safe access for vehicles and pedestrians and all types of activity that are anticipated to be a part of the proposed development. 8 1 P a g e 4{3 Andover Senior Campus The development will continue the city path that is currently on Hanson, all along the Crosstown Blvd. NW side of the site. Concrete sidewalks to promote pedestrian traffic throughout the site will also be installed. The development will install a single lane roundabout at Bluebird and Crosstown to facilitate traffic in and out of the site. C. Provides a buffer between different uses, adjacent properties, roadways, between backyards of back-to-back lots. Landscape buffering is proposed between existing neighborhoods and the senior campus. Between the commercial site and existing neighbors, a 4' berm with screening vegetation is also proposed. D. Preserves existing stands of trees and/or significant trees. Where existing trees will be removed, privacy and screening are a main priority with landscaping whether it be leaving existing trees where we can, or planting new vegetation buffers. A tree inventory was completed and found many of the existing trees not in good shape. The current landscape plan incorporates buffering to screen adjacent properties. E. Provides considerable landscaping treatments that complement the overall design and contribute toward an overall landscaping theme. Independent Living/ Assisted Living/Memory Care: The proposed Landscape plan will feature native tree, shrub, and perennial plantings. Plantings around the perimeter of the site will help to screen adjacent properties to reduce the impact of the new development and provide new residents with screening and privacy from the street. A 4' berm with screening vegetation is proposed between the neighborhood commercial and existing neighborhood to minimize views of the commercial property and provide an attractive visual screen from cars and headlights in the commercial parking lot. Brownstones: As these buildings are part of a future phase, the area where these proposed buildings would be built will be seeded until development occurs. We anticipate that once developed, the landscape plan will be like what is proposed for the Independent Living/Assisting Living/Memory Care building and feature native trees, shrubs, and perennial plantings. Cottages: As these buildings are part of a future phase, the area where these proposed buildings would be built will be seeded until development occurs. We anticipate that once developed, the landscape plan will be like what is proposed for the Independent Living/Assisting Living/Memory Care building and feature native trees, shrubs, and perennial plantings. Commercial: As this building is part of a future phase, the area where the proposed building would be built will be seeded until development occurs. We anticipate that once developed, the landscape plan will be like what is proposed for the Independent Living/Assisting Living/Memory Care building and feature native trees, shrubs, and perennial plantings. We intend to use the same landscape designer for the future phases so there is one consistent landscape theme for the property. 91 Page 41q Andover Senior Campus F. Preserves significant usable space on individual lots or through the provision of open space within the development. Independent Living/ Assisted Living/Memory Care: • A large dining patio is located in the `courtyard' of the building along Hanson. • Memory Care has their own dedicated patio with landscaping, fenced for the safety of residents. • Concrete walking paths will be provided throughout the site connecting the various buildings and amenities, encouraging residents and visitors to enjoy the site. • Stormwater retention ponds will be located on site and landscaped to be visually appealing throughout the seasons. Brownstones: Parking for these buildings will be located underneath the building which will allow more green space on the site. Surface parking like the IL/AL/MC main building will be constructed along the main drive to that building. Sidewalks to connect these buildings to other parts of the property. Stormwater retention will be handled by ponds located on the site. Cottages: Access to the cottages will be via a driveway from the internal roadway. Each unit will have direct sidewalk access to the driveway. Stormwater retention will be handled by ponds located on the site. Commercial: A separate lot for the commercial component is planned along Crosstown. A 4' berm will screen any headlights pointing toward houses along Bluebird. Any outdoor courtyard or play area, will be constructed on the west side of this building away from Crosstown and Bluebird. G. Provides an attractive streetscape through the use of undulating topography, landscaping, decorative street lighting, decorative mailbox groupings, retaining walls, boulders, fencing, area identification signs, etc. Independent Living/ Assisted Living/Memory Care: • Interior mailboxes eliminate the need for additional structures on site. • Site lighting will be designed to minimally impact neighbors while meeting code requirements. Building is set back from Hanson 100' for deeper visibility on the road and for more green space for residents facing Hanson. Retaining walls will be block that matches the exterior building materials on site in color and style. Brownstones: These buildings are proposed for the interior portion of the site. Retaining walls that match the building exterior materials will be utilized to allow drive lanes for the underground parking to be constructed. We anticipate that mailboxes will be located within each building. Cottages: We anticipate using a pedestal box for mail service for these 9 units located in a central area near these buildings. The landscaping for these units will look like what you find with a single-family home. 101 Page y5 Andover Senior Campus Commercial: A 4' berm will screen the east side of the building from the neighborhood. The building is 62 feet from the ROW on Bluebird and close to 100 feet back from Crosstown which allows for more green space and parking. H. The proposed structures within the development demonstrate quality architectural design and the use of high quality building materials for unique design and detailing. Independent Living/ Assisted Living/Memory Care: The development and design team are proposing an apartment building with a contemporary upscale look, while complementing the surrounding residential site context; single family homes, Clocktower Commons commercial area, Andover Elementary, and Andover City Hall. • The colors chosen draw inspiration from the existing neighborhood homes and nature surrounding the site and city of Andover. We've used subtle color blocking to break up the building and avoid the look of a repetitive building facade. • Durable materials are used to ensure maintenance free design that keep it looking new throughout the years and Minnesota weather. • The prefabricated suspended decks will continue the building layers for more depth and visual interest. • The main entrance with port cochere welcomes residents and guests. The front entry incorporates textures and glassy exterior that allows others to see into the building common amenity spaces and encourage them to step inside. Brownstones: The design and colors for these buildings will complement the main IL/AL/MC building. Balconies will be provided for 2°d floor residents that look residential. The garage entries will be clearly identified as will the main floor guest entry. Cottages: The design and colors for these buildings will complement the main IL/AL/MC building and the brownstones. These units are residential looking, very similar to a single-family home. Commercial: The commercial building will have durable materials like other commercial buildings located near this property. I. The lasting quality of the development will be ensured by design, maintenance and use guidelines established through an owners' association. The property is being purchased by the J.A. Wedum Foundation. Separate LLC's controlled by the J.A. Wedum Foundation will ultimately own the parcels. The neighborhood commercial will likely be sold to a 3'd party for development. The non-profit organizational documents does not allow the J.A. Wedum Foundation to own and operate commercial property. Common area maintenance agreements will be in put place as part of developing the property. The J.A. Wedum Foundation will maintain control and assess the commercial property their pro- rata share of common area costs. Each resident's lease will have the following language. "Certificate of Age: 111 Page L/(P Andover Senior Campus NAME OF COMMUNITY is an equal opportunity provider of housing for persons age 55 and over. Except with respect to age, as allowed by law, NAME OF COMMUNITY does not discriminate based on any status protected by law in the rental or advertising of its housing units. By signing this Assisted Living Contract, you certify that all of the Residents listed above are at least 55 years of age on the first day of tenancy at NAME OF COMMUNITY." 121 Page L/'7 i"llimms _;§j 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV MEM0"NAVOM TO: Joe Janish, Community Development Director FROM: David Berkowitz, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Jason Law, Assistant City Engineer DATE: March 6, 2024 REFERENCE: Andover Senior Campus / Commercial Site Plan / Review #2 The following comments are regarding to Review #2• 1. (Review #1) Need to obtain the necessary permits from the Coon Creek Watershed District (Grading, Storm Water Design and Erosion Control), MPCA and MCES (Sanitary Sewer), MDH (Water Main), DOLI (utilities), Anoka County Highway Department, and/or any other agency that may be interested in the site. Provide copies of permits to City. Noted, kept for tracking. Plans submitted to ACHD and CCWD by developer. Submit updated plans / stormwater report to ACHD and CCWD. Submit copy of comments received by each agency to City. 2. (Review #1) Provide an O&M agreement for the storm sewer sump catch basins as well as all on site infiltration basins and ponding areas. Noted, kept for tracking. To be provided upon approval of stormwater management plan. 3. (Review #1) When site grading is completed an as -built grading plan shall be submitted to the City for review using Anoka County coordinates and elevation datum. Developer's engineer shall certify the site is in compliance with the approved grading plan prior to City approval. Noted, kept for tracking. 4. Sheet 24.0014PP and all applicable sheets: ROW corner radii at northwest, northeast and southwest corners of site shall be 30' radii (minimum) or greater to encompass existing utilities. Radius at northeast corner to be revised to include future trail around round about (see sheet C1.5). 5. Sheet 24.0014PP: Delete "Future" from Proposed Right of Way note along Crosstown Blvd. Label "Proposed Right of Way" along Hanson Blvd over the existing road and utility easement. 6. Sheet 24.0014PP and all applicable sheets: Include Drainage and Utility Easement in northeast corner of the site to encompass a storm sewer stub to future round about. 7. Sheet C1.1: add "Fire Access" to note for grass over reinforced mat. 8. Sheet C1.1: Label "Future Roundabout (Conceptual). 9. Sheet C1.1: Phasing note refers to red lines and shading, no red lines or shading on sheet? 10. Sheet C1.1: For the proposed right turn lane on Crosstown Blvd, add dimension labels as marked up, as well as width of proposed right in/right out pavement widths. 11. Sheet C1.3: Show turning movements for fire truck into and out of right in/right out on Crosstown Blvd. These were shown in the previous submittal. 12. Sheet L1-L5: Don't show trees that are to be removed. Keep trees and shrubs above the proposed 100-year flood elevation within all drainage and utility easements and out of the sight corner for Hanson Blvd and Crosstown Blvd and the sight triangle of the new road and Crosstown Blvd. 13. (Review #1) Sheets C2.1-C2.3: Identify areas of fill with a hatch pattern, identify in legend. Noted, to be addressed in next submittal. 14. Stormwater calculations in Hydrocad utilized amended CN values for disturbed areas. Need to address somewhere in plans how soils are to be amended in disturbed areas. 41 15. Sheet C2.1: General Notes are cut off on bottom. 16. Sheet C2.2 and all applicable sheets: For Low Area 4 label proposed and existing HWL's. 17. Sheet C2.2: Basin 3 and Areas 604 HWL elevations don't match Hydrocad model. 18. Sheet C2.2: For Basin 4, label the EOF as OCS rim. Currently it's called out as overland but the trail on Hanson Blvd is higher than the EOF elevation listed. 19. Sheet C2.3: Add EOF elevations for paved area low points at areas identified (all low areas). 20. Sheet C2.3: Add spot elevation for elevation between pre-treatment cell and Basin 1. 21. Sheet C2.3: Berm proposed in north corner of site may need to be removed or adjusted if ponding needs to be expanded to incorporate additional drainage area along Crosstown Blvd for future roundabout. 22. Sheet C2.3: Retaining walls over 3 feet shall have "Decorative" fences instead of split rail. 23. Sheet C2.3: Show sight corner (different from sight triangle) for the southeast quadrant of Hanson Blvd and Crosstown Blvd. No trees or shrubs are allowed in this area. 24. Sheet C3.1: Review water main under retaining wall near low area 4. Wall appears to be 13' high, which will make water main 20'+/- deep in parking lot prior to angling upwards. May want to consider a steel casing pipe under the wall in case this pipe ever has a leak or needs to be replaced in the future. Discuss with City staff. 25. Sheet C3.1: Label size, slope, and inverts for sanitary stubs to brownstones and commercial pad. 26. Sheet C3.2: For storm sewer connection into Anoka County storm sewer system on Hanson Blvd, County comment referenced preferring tying into the existing stub further south if possible. Not sure if there is enough grade to route Basin 4 there, but it may be better to route Basin 6 to the southerly stub, or also look at discharging Basin 6 into Basin 4 as marked up. 27. Sheets C3.2 & C3.3: Update pipe grades and IE's into OCS structures to improve skimming. 28. Sheets C3.2 & C3.3: Change storm sewer pipe in Crosstown Blvd ROW from 12" to 15". 29. Sheet C3.3: Storm sewer configuration between Basin 3 and Low Area 4 outlets will tend to push water south to Low Area 4. Review redlines, changing angle of pipes would promote flow north in storm sewer versus south. 30. Sheet C3.3: Provide a storm sewer stub in the north corner to the future roundabout. Extend pipe 10' past right of way. Provide calculations for 10 year flow rate in this pipe assuming all of Subcatchment INT drains to this pipe. 31. (Review #1) Sheet C4.1: There are numerous details missing from the plans, including but not limited to: typical sections / pavement insets (internal and external to site), sidewalk / trail, ped ramps, curb and gutter, concrete medians, pipe bedding installation, hydrants, gate valves, water main insultation, water main offset (if needed), water services, sanitary sewer details (MH, cleanout, pipe, etc.), rock construction entrance, retaining wall, fencing, mailbox cluster detail and concrete pad, handicap parking stalls and signage, etc. Most added, additional details as needed to be included in next submittal. 32.Sheet C4.1: Recommend changing Light Duty Bituminous Inset to 2-1.5" lifts as the 1" wearing course as currently proposed is difficult to construct. 33. Sheet C4.1: Add pavement inset for Crosstown Boulevard Turn Lane. Current pavement section for Crosstown Blvd is marked up in plans. 34. Sheet C4.1: Add column headers to Storm Sewer Structure Schedule (Structure #, Size/Detail, and Casting). 35. Sheet C4.2: Add pipe sizes to all details. Revise inlet pipes to have steeper reverse grade for skimming. Maintain minimum of 1' of concrete between front rim elevation of OCS and top of inlet pipe. Make sure changes reflected in Hydrocad models. Elevations and orifice size for Basin 3 do not match Hydrocad model. 36. Refer to redlined plan sheets for additional minor comments or those not addressed herein. 37. Identify in comment letter any changes made to plans since previous submittal not addressed in response comments. 38. Additional comments pending further review. y9 K The following Comments are regarding the Stormwater Report Review #2 1. In the Proposed Tributary Area Map and stormwater models, include additional area shown into Subcatchment INT for future roundabout drainage. This area is for the north half of Crosstown Blvd west of the intersection that currently flows to a French Drain in the northern ditch between the road and trail west of Bluebird Street. This area will need to be picked up with storm sewer in the ultimate condition. Update text (area) in report on Page 2 of 5 under Basin 1 paragraph and associated flow rate summary tables. Show storm sewer stub in maps to Subcatchment INT. 2. In Proposed Tributary Area Map, correct labels for CB 602 and B6 low areas to match Hydrocad. Label Subcatchment 1 area as well. 3. In the proposed Hydrocad models, update inlet pipe reverse grade elevations as marked up (or something similar) to provide skimming in proposed basins. Pipe grades as proposed nearly flat into OCS structures will not provide skimming in basins. Maintain 1' of concrete (minimum) between top of inlet pipe and front rim elevation of OCS structures. Make sure revised elevations and pipe grades match plans. 4. The proposed HWL for Basin 3 and orifice diameter for Basin 3 OCS do not match the plans. 5. In the Proposed Conditions Model (Basins Starting at Bottom), carry thru above comments from HWL model. 6. Refer to marked up stormwater report for additional minor comments. 7. Additional comments pending further review. Note: It is a requirement that the Developer respond to each of these items in writing hoet dicjital copy from City and type responses below original comment) when re -submitting the revised plans to the City. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Jason Law, Assistant City Engineer at (763) 767-5130 or David Berkowitz, Director of Public Works/City Engineer at (763) 767-5133. 5'O C I T Y O F NDOVE^ 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVE RMN GOV MEMORANDUM To: Joe Janish, Community Development Director From: Kameron Kytonen, Natural Resources Technician Date: March 11, 2024 Reference: Andover Senior Campus CSP Comments l . Please show the proposed plants being planted on the actual landscape plan. This makes it easier to read to see what species are being planted where. 2. Columnar Swedish aspen is not a recommended planting choice. a. A couple recommended planting choices in its replacement includes but is not limited to blue beech and pagoda dogwood 3. Additional comments pending further review. S'( NDOVE •'AN A 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVE RMN.GOV TO: Michael Gould, SilverCrest FROM: Joe Janish, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Review #2 — J.A. Wedum Foundation/SilverCrest Andover Senior Campus DATE: March 12, 2024 Review #2 Comments: 101. City Council took action on March 4, 2024 related to the Comprehensive Plan. The 60 day review period has now started. 102. Provide a copy of the CCWD permit to City once approved. 103. Continue submittals and review by Anoka County Highway Department. 104. Activity within the power line easement will require approval by Power Company. 105. Luminaire/Photometric Plan is missing. This will need to be submitted as part of the Commercial Site Plan. 106. Fencing or some alternative will be required at top of retaining wall in SE corner of parking lot for IL/MC/AL facility. This fencing will have to be of quality and design to block headlights from reaching homes to the south and southeast. 107. It appears as though lots consist of each "use". The PUD will need to note that multiple structures will be on one lot. 108. An easement will need to be recorded for the private roadways. 109. A unit count (1 bedroom, 2 bedroom, etc) for all residential structures will be needed to calculate lot size to unit requirements. 110. See PUD Review comments. 111. Additional comments pending further review. LANDSCAPE PLAN 112. Please see Memorandum from Kameron Kytonen, Natural Resources Technician. AS -BUILT SURVEY/FINAL PLAN SET REQUIRED 113. An as -built survey shall be prepared showing that the site has been constructed to the approved utility and grading plan. 114. The approved final plan set must be submitted in paper and in a digital format (.dwg or .dxf). BUILDING PERMIT 115. See Commercial Building Plan Requirements handout. Also available on the Building Department web page at www.andoven-nn.gov. FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS 116 Additional comments pending further review. 5Z Anoka County TRANSPORTATION DIVISION Joe Janish City of Andover February 14, 2024 1685 Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 RE: Preliminary Plat — Andover Senior Campus Deal -Joe, We have reviewed the Preliminary Plat for Andover Senior Campus to be located east of CSAH 78 (Hanson Boulevard NW) and south of Crosstown Boulevard NW within the City of Andover, and I offer the following comments: • The existing right of way along CSAH 78 is 75 feet east of centerline which should be sufficient for future reconstruction purposes. • As proposed, the plat will not introduce and new access points onto county roads. Any existing driveways or field entrances within the boundaries of this development are required to be removed and the ditch section restored to match existing depth, slope, and grades. No access points onto CSAH 78 will be permitted and the right of access along CSAH 78 should be dedicated to Anoka County. • Internal site grading shall not commence until the requested ACHD Engineering plan approvals are received and the applicable permits can be issued. • Any utility relocation in the CSAH 78 right of way will be required to be coordinated directly by the city/developer. • Please note that no plantings or private signs will be permitted within the county right of way and care must be exercised when locating private signs, building, structures, plantings, berms, etc. outside of the county right of way, so as not to create any new sight obstructions for this section of CSAH 78. ACHD would like to work with local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and the county highway system. It should be recognized that residential land uses located adjacent to County highways often results in complaints about traffic noise. Existing and/or future traffic noise from CSAH 78 could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCA's Noise Area Classification (NAC) where establishment of the land use would result in violations of established noise standards. It is advised that the City and the Developer assess the noise situation for this development as it is proposed to be located directly adjacent to CSAH 78 and take the level of action deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise by incorporating the appropriate noise mitigation elements into the design and phasing of this plat as applicable. Our Passion Is Your Safe Way Home 1440 Bunker Lake B , ul vard 11 b`,' ♦ f l 1553ii 1 of}i} cif 703-324-310,) ♦ ra 763 33-)2i, r ,tiv;, anokacount'y us"highway ss Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer The ACHD Engineering Plan Review process will apply to this site. The following items should be submitted to Brandon Ulvenes, Engineer II, Brandon.Ulvenes(c�anokacountymn aov (checklist and payment information are available on our website: https://www.anokacountymn-gov/4072/Development-Review): • Construction plans • Utility relocation plans ■ Traffic Control plans • Grading and erosion control plans ■ Drainage calculations — Note that the post -developed rate/volume of runoff must not exceed the pre -developed rate/volume of runoff for the 10-year critical design storm • ACHD Design Requirements Checklist • Engineering plan review fee (estimated at $150.00) If any work will be performed in the County Right of Way, a Permit for work within the County Right of Way ($150.00) must be obtained prior to the commencement of any construction. License permit bonding, methods of construction, design details, work zone traffic control, restoration requirements and follow-up inspections are typical elements of the permitting process. Contact Sue Burgmeier via phone at 763.324.3176 or via email at HighwayPermits(a�anokacountymn qov for further information and to coordinate the ACHD Permit process. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this review. Sincerely, Logan Keehr Traffic Engineering Technician xc: CSAH 78/Plats+Developments/2024 Jerry Auge, Assistant County Engineer David Zieglmeier, County Surveyor Sean Thiel, Traffic Engineering Manager Sue Burgmeier, Traffic Technician Brandon Ulvenes, Engineer II sy CHAPTER I I -- i1Ju ''1l ik' '►1f�O !z' us', l2 S5 Usc-S COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PERMITTED, PERMITTED ACCESSORY, CONDITIONAL, INTERIM AND PROHIBITED USES P — Permitted Use NB —Neighborhood Business PA — Permitted Accessory Use SC — Shopping Center C — Conditional Use GB — General Business I — Interim Use I - Industrial PUD — Planned Unit Development X — Prohibited Use If Use Not Specifically Listed or Provided for Elsewhere in the CityCode, It Is Prohibited Uses Zonin Districts AUTO RELATED USES NB SC GB I Automobile service stations in compliance with City Code 12-12-4 C3 CZ C C Car wash automated X C X X Car wash self service X X P P Car wash accessory to automobile service station x P P P School bus terminal X X X P Transportation terminals or motor freight terminals X X X X Vehicle sales new in Compliance with City Code 3-8 X X C C Vehicle sales used in Compliance with City Code 3-8 X C C LIQUOR NB GB I Liquor licenses in compliance with CityCode 3-1 C6 ECC C C Liquor License, On -Sale Wine in compliance with CityCode 3-1 C C C Liquor stores, off -sale in compliance with CityCode 3-1 C6 C X RETAIL TRADE AND SERVICES NB SC GB I Adult use business as defined in Title 3 Chapter 7 of the City Code X X C C Barbershops and beauty salons P P P X Campgrounds, gun clubs and ranges, archery ranges, racetracks X X X X Christmas tree sales I I I I Commercial recreation, indoors P P P P Commercial recreation outdoors C C C C Commercial riding stables X X X X Crematorium in compliance with definition under City Code 12-2 X X C C Daycare centers Commercial P P P P Daycare centers(drop in PA PA PA PA Drive in businesses or businesses with a drive through window C C C C Dry Cleaning Processing (Amended Ord. 323, 2-7-2006) in compliance with defmition under CityCode 12-2 X X C C Financial institutions P P P P Hotels and motels C C C C Lumberyard X X X C Medical and dental clinics P P P P Medical clinic - continuous operation C C C C Mortuaries and funeral homes without crematorium P P P P Pawnbrokers- as defined in Title 3, Chapter 4 of the City Code X C C C Precious metal dealers -as defined in City Code 3-4 X C C C Professional studios P P P P Recreational vehicle, boat, and marine a ui ment sales X P P P Rental businesses (Equipment) P P Repair services as defined in City Code 12-2 P P P P Resorts X X X X Restaurants/cafes P P P P Restaurant with live entertainment X C C X Retail trade and services P P P C Secondhand goods dealers as defined in Title 3, Chapter 4 of this code X C C C 55 Theaters Indoors X P P P Theaters Outdoors X X X X Veterinary clinics no outside pens or animal storage) C C P P SCHOOLS NB SC GB I K-12 X X X X Post -Secondary Schools C C C C Schools exceeding height maximum up to 45 feet in height C C I C C STORAGE NB SC GB I Bulk fuel storage (tanks greater than 1,000-gallon storage capacity) in compliance with City Code 12-8-2 C C C C Highway construction materials (temporary processing and storage) in compliance with City Code 12-16 compliance I I I I Mini storage indoor storage only) X X I C C Outdoor display, storage, and sales C C C C Outdoor display, storage, and sales- during operating hours only C C C C Tires - Exterior storage of waste tires X X X X Tires - Interior storage of more than eight 8 waste tires C C C C Toxic waste storage X X X X UTILITIES NB SC GB I Private utilities as, electric, phone, cable, etc. in Compliance with City Code 8-2 P P P P Private utility structures and/or uses electrical transmission lines gas pipelines, etc. C C C C Public utility uses for local service P P P P OTHER NB SC GB I Any incidental repair, processing, and storage necessary to conduct a permitted commercial or industrial principal use but not to exceed thirty percent (30%) of the floor areas ace of the principal building. PA PA PA PA Antennas in excess of thirty-five feet (35') in height in compliance with City Code 9- 12 C C C C Buildings (Principal) exceeding height maximum subject to City Code 12-3-5 C C C C Contractors' Shops and Storage YardS5 C5 X P P Religious Institution X C C X Clubs and lodges X X P X Continuous operation of a business P P X4 X4 Excavation (Mining) greater than 400 cubic yards when no building permit has been issued in compliance with CityCode 12-13 I I I I Golf courses and driving ranges X X X X Group Homes as regulated by State Statute X X X X Junkyards X X X X Land Reclamation in compliance with City Code 12-13 I I I I Landfills X X X X Manufacturing X X P P Marinas X X X X Offices P P P P Publicly owned and operated property except as herein amended P P P P Research laboratories X X P P Swimming pools and recreation areas or structures PA PA PA PA Uses which may be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons residing or workingin the vicinityX X X X Wholesale businesses X X P P Wind Energy Conversion Systems (WECS)-as defined in and in compliance with Title 9, Chapter 13 of this code. WECS are prohibited on WIDE site. C C C C Solar Energy Systems(ground mounted X X X X Solar Energy Systems roof mounted PA PA PA PA Activities involving the storage, utilization or manufacture of materials or products such as TNT or dynamite. I I I I Notes: 1. Conditional use permits for uses not listed herein shall not be granted except where the city council determines that said uses are similar in character to those listed herein. Within any of the following districts, no land or structure shall be used for the following uses by districts except by conditional use permit and in accordance with the criteria as stated in subsection 12-15-61) of this title. 2. Provided a minimum of twenty-five thousand (25,000) square feet of retail floor space is constructed, except as otherwise approved as part of a Planned Unit Development. 3. After a minimum of two thousand (2,000) square feet of retail floor space is constructed, provided the site is two (2) acres or larger. 4. Sec 12-2-2 for definitions of "Continuous Operation and Non -continuous Operation". From November 15th to January 1st continuous operation will be allowed in the General Business and Industrial Zoning District. 5. Contractors' Shops and Storage Yards within NB — Neighborhood Business districts shall be located on properties outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary. 6. Provided the use is located within a contiguous NB -Neighborhood Business District that is at least 5-acres in size. (Amended Ord. 552, 5-2-23) SECTION COMPARISON Andover Senior .-� n n i n ONE I y.. ,• ORR. w �iittnEH :-�s� 1 6�6 e:'-� 4iS.5 1. �i l�ditxF CONCEPTUAL COMMERCIAL Andover Senior ---MINN V, vlk MOPOL4 , , AM r■ ou RENDERING Andover Senior Material Mark Description 4.1 BRICK - CHARCOAL 5.2 ALUMINUM BALCONY - COLOR: BLACK 7.0 ROOF SHINGLES - ASPHALT - ARCHITECTURAL GRADE 7.1 LAP SIDING - GRAY 7.2 LAP SIDING - WOOD TONE 7.3 LAP SIDING - COPPER 7.4 VERTICAL LAP SIDING - WHITE 7.5 VERTICAL LAP SIDING - DARK GRAY 7.6 LAP SIDING - DARK GRAY 8.0 WINDOWS AND PATIO DOORS - BLACK 8.1 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 8.2 ALUMINUM PERGOLA - BLACK Image M .9 M ill ii ii iiii Iltmog"�® iiii'mrs-mm t-60--- iii M.M.N.ii iii ill MEMO. mum. M.N.M.N.M.N.: illii ii iii ii ii iii gmgffijj; I'll mono ill ummmm ii �01 iii 1gim iiii ii ii iii cm ii ou M.E.E.M.N.:, mu ii'', ii ii M.N.M._ii�■ii iii 0.1 ii SEEMS i 0 Ilill�ll II�� � ■■ �mm ■■ ■■ ■■■M no: onM■■�■01 ■■■ .I ■■no' IId ■ MON■■■No ON ■■■ ■■ ■■ INS Iklllllll ■ ■■ son �iEWOMW � u— On ■■ ■■ ■■■ ■MEN ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■r ■■■■■ ■■ ■■"on■ : ■■■ ■■ ■■I'm on AL - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Andover Senior MEN .. •r•r1 ^ttr•ltrs r• ..NON .. MONO ll%.. III MONO. MONO. mom ■.■ .■■ . ■ Il..!■. ■■ ��� �.Am Sol G. r.G...1,, mmons MC - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS m ;..niFl ■mI ■■■ t , ■..iI ■.■ I ■E ,1,1 ... �� M.M.M. • �Il ... l�•..Il ... MONO. �� . . . . . . . . . . . . Andover Senior iii ii i ii iii ■■ iii 1i iii_-- ■■'mW01,11,11011,IIIIIIIIINII IIIInIINII ■■■ ■■ ■■■ ■■ ■ ,, ■ ■■ ■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ - ■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■ _ IIINIIIII � ii:NlliVil IIIV�Ililll INIIIIINItf iii ii i ii iii ■■ iii iii iii. iii iii ... iii ■!" iii iii ■ ■ INI■I IIIVlllil IIIIIILI _ IN ii _ ii ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ on ■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ �■ lei NMI ■■■ ■■■ ON no ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■■ ■■ ■■■ Tn■■ ■■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■ ■■■ ■ME■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■ � IINNNII� _ I IIIINIII� IINI INIII son ,.■■ mom MMM _■■ mom ■■ MO - oil - - IIIIIIIIIN ■■e ! .. ■■■ . ■■m ■■ ■■■ ■■■ ON ■■■ - ■n MEN■ ■■■ ■■■ Illl hlll IN IN IIII ININ iii ■ iii iii ■■ iii iii ■■ IINI ININ I, mom ■■ MEMNO MEMO monI �� Imli - iNlll!Ilm: I! ■ ■ - i iii ■■ ■■■ ■■ ■■■ ■■ ■■ MEMO ■ !11111111111 R ■. ■ ■ ■ I ■■■ ROM■■■ on ■■■ ■■ ■■■ ■■■ IIINIkIIINIII II ■■■ on ■■■ on ■■■ IL - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Andover Senior J ■■ iCG iii iiC ■` iii iii h1 Ci iii iii` ■■ Elm iii rl noC■ ill Cnono !■ iiino �■ YYIINI q!II!!Y d■■.a ININIIIII Y■■i so on in MEN Ion Mom Mom won MEN IIIIIIINI in ■� no ..■ ■■i MIIY ■■■ Y■■':! INIIIIIIII IIINIIINII .■■ II■■li ■■ U! mom won L �■ ConIN 111- ONE an on ■■ Conon .■. ■■ .._ ... ■■ _ onll ononon ond� I® MOM MEN mom ��■ ■■■ ■■■ . ... ..■ ... .. ...- ■ ■■, IIIIIIIIII ■ IWIIII!II ■ all®IIIII ■ IVIIIIIIII . �IVINIVNY ■ ■YIt ■ NIIINWIs Ion ■■ MEN CCC noon: ■■ now ONE ■■ MEN Conno CCC ■■ CMon Con: ■■ CCC CCC noon: ■■ OCC ■■ YYIIVI IIIIIIYIY Y�IIIII IIIIIIIIIII VININIIII IVINIIII IYII�Y .0 so ANN ICI II!!1� 'ml�m I fl►n■s ■■ ■ n■ ■■ ■■on' son 1 oil RE HIM MR Hol ME Ul ■■ IIIY { �� IOglll! so i ii nonon ili■- ■■■ iii nono 11 11 11 N 11 11 11 11 1111 MEN MEN won Ono 9 11 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. I MEN MEN ONE MEN 0 ■■I YYNNII V.V�;I:: N on I11I IL - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Andover Senior ■■ EME EDE ■■ 11 ■�NI�111 �� ��� a IIIrVI �■� ��0 -I ME II II ■M E1 ME MM ME ■■■ �IIIIIIIII IIII IIIII 11 I Mrs �� •II• Wh ii iii ■■,,■■ ii ii v■ VI■IIN6� llllllllll on ■■ ■■■ ■■■d �� ■■■■ =3■■OF. ■ -' ■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ .■■ ■■■ ON on - IIINIIIIII ii ii: �� ism_ ■■ �� ■■� ■■■ 111 ON I I I I No iii iii ■■ ii iii =�■ ■ iii VIIIIIIII II■■L iii ■■ ii iii qe iii iii NIIIAII II■INI,: ■ iii ■■ ii iii ■■ iii iii IIIPII IIIII IVII IIIVI IL - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS NNo ME on ii ii ii ii ■■s on Illill 111 ME ■■ oil on ■■ Ad Andover Senior 111 �� �jj II 11 tI 1111�� , 111 j11 II ill 11 ve^°� P'�� 111 31 I III �.` •_. � _ '•. '•— CROSSTOWN RENDERING _Mae jam~ Andover Senior FRONT ENTRY Andover Senior lye. r 0 0 ca < m 70 m Fl- OK5 m - 0 -7 44M r . f o sma ill 1 4041 � dk4NETSTq'Nw' API PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: TYPICAL h /� DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ANDOVER SENIOR CAMPUS I DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: / , FUTURE ROUND-A00UT •� -` Mx x°. v"fix"x°"naoM ' —__ MAY REQUIRE MDIIIOIUL 'I O 1 RIGM OF WAY OEDIUTION DEVELOPER ENGINEER ARCHITECT I I - - - - - - = - BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING ALL RIGHT J.A. WEDURLSON FOUNDATION PLOWS ENGINEERING KAA1301 MIRK ARCHITECTS OF WAY AND EXTERIOR LOT LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE 2 CARLSO ,PARKWAY, $TE 335 6776 LAKE DRIVE NE, STE 110 1301 AMERICN, BLVD E, 5 100 I SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. \ / - JAYMOUTH, MN 55447 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 SARAH KERN,A MN 55425 .4/ i �df \ ]AY PORTZ ADAM GINKEL SARAM ERN, AIA, CDT 612-789-3363 651.361-8234 612.285-3891 I I I -! I`- \ / / aQ.�P r- • y JAYPORTZOWEDUM.ORG ADAMOPLOWE.COM SARAHK@KAASWILSON.COM -',r_' y`" ♦/ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: <t That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south and east of County Road 18, also known as Crosstown Blvd.; except that part platted as __" Winslow Hills, Winslow Hills 2nd Addition and Winslow Hills Addition. / ;a' \\ � ' I NORTH and GRAPHIC SCALE PARCEL B: I I / • ° \ �-{a y I I 60 0 Ja 60 120 The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, except that part platted asSPQv Winslow Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota. LOTS =%'' rZ I ' I 1 INCH = 60 FEET 65,31 NOTES 1ASF' �A<, '," ,sS.• 1�1. BENCHMARK Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 5/11/2022, 5/12/2022 and 1/8/2024. I ovy/o-� ��i .' \ pNOKA COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. 2031 r. 6 o�yeo !j/ ' \� ' 5\ a ELEVATION: 898.60 (NAND DATUM) f - Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum. I w � �I I / e" � /� ¢ 1• �\ ZOCA. v - Parcel ID Number: 23-32-24-32-0006 (Parcel A) and 23-32-24-33-0002 (Parcel B). � / � / ope�vdf' •,� / \ 'o `�,ya�m \\ �. \ _ K� s \ - Total boundary area = 655,508 sf (15.04 acres) I m I � �c°� ` / /- \ � Parcel area less proposed right of way dedication = 582,154 sf (13.36 acres) I ^ I / •6i/� °h // ".K, \ �a Surveyed premises shown on this survey map Is in Flood Zone X (Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.), according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Comunity No. 270689 Panel No. 0306 Suffix E by the Federal Emergency Management o°� Agemncy, effective date December 16, 2015. Q v\e4' / / �a f l,•` ' / V•I \ /? 'io - Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. This surve was reared using a commitment for title Insurance :N ��y���F Y prepared 9 prepared by Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Commitment No. 680387, dated effective June 20, 2023. Site Plan by Kaas Wilson Architects li 1 Civil Plan by Plowe Engineering.c\' LEGEND • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELEDUrt�EgNO \ 11- �•i',�-'' 9r — — R MONUMENT O DENOTES IRON MMENT SET, MARKED RLS:P 41578 AREAS ♦ DENOTES SET MONOK AIL Q I>� p¢Yyc'�y \— PROPOSED LOT 1 - 319,653 SF t `? e, J/` '�t' yNdaPy \ %,y\ ... - /// L,' '0 \ ❑ DENOTES CATCH BASIN PROPOSED LOT 2 = 103,384 SF�` - .arigy --- ----- "--'- I l0 II D DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX PROPOSED LOT = 65,3415E o�A` ¢Eye pltio \ ��� --------+�/ at m DENOTES ELECTRICAL MANHOLE PROPOSED LOT 4 = 92,550 SF LOT PRO POSED RIGHT OF WAY =74.5805E Ye�v o°�n \ \ __ „.� "'--""7"'----x�• �[D D DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOX II o rP '" / "` --- - --� -+�- TOTAL PARCEL AREA = 655,508 SFg�tiA' AREA \ >- \ 0 DENOTES LIGHT POLE I `\In 1`M1'.po1 (7.35 AclF ♦ \\ I : .aa =,•s '�\ / / \ ° \ . rcy DENOTES POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES n PROPOSED I r %'� \ m DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE �'� _ j BUILDING) I o'�. $✓�"� B T \ r DENOTES SIGN ZONING III o W GARAGE FLOOR: 897.00 ux. DQ DENOTES GAS VALVE 57 Ila £ i FIRST FLOOR = 908.25 Per City of Andover Zoning Map dated -all DENOTES STORM SEWER APRON November 2023 this site is currently zoned M-2 bd DENOTES WATER VALVE (Multiple Dwelling High -Low Density). i m DENOTESTELEPHONE PEDESTAL M-2 Building Lot Standards: I (%Jn_ I n0 \ \ sJe NP c DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE Min. Lot Width =ISO fee[ r t —�— DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE Min. Lot Depth = 150 feet I > I - \\ / DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER Max. Building Height = 35 feet i •�/ \ \ �/ \ !9 , - I • +' " �' `� Max.Building overage = -y>/i - /Mr; p+ \ —> DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER BildiC30% /, \ �y � 3 ���+� O � DENOTES IXISTING WATER MAINEA M-2 Building Setbacks: srMFN, u 3 - J DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE Front = 40 fee[ o 1 Side (Interior = 30 feet L '::J DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE Side (street) = 30 fee[ e° DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION Rear = 30 feet -� ! DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS Any yard from County Road = 50 fee[ �I.. _ \ - - •y j\��i �/ / I • a `' `I1r .. : `. ` ' , ` ' I DENOTES ADJACENT PARCEL OWNER INFORMATION EXCEPTION (PER ANOKA COUNTY TAX INFORMATION) r _- _PERMANENT ROAD AND MLRY ___ EASEMENT PER WC. NO. iea086 / " ! . _ --�� ;-/ ....:— J rouse VICINITY MAP PART OF SEC. 23, TWP. 32, RNG. 24 I hereby certify that this survey, plan 38�"20'2$"E' "N I or report was prepared by me or under I / h Q I -' `" .. `- . I my direct supervision and that I am a t� a �� I 1 I q I I `E X C E Ph I O N ' duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ¢� -4a I ._ w� ---- _ JAso 3/18/2024 Dale: License No. 41578 a' Nax I 320 1— i= 1 1507}4 LANE NW — G. Rlin P. SONS € Imn Professional Land Surveyors ® "x-x.w ilukS 6776 Lake Drive NE Suite 110 I DMWNSY: JER JDe NO: ::BWW PATE: 2/6RDl, WWW.egrud.com CNEIX 211 JER FIELD CRE CO!M1 Lino Lakes, MN 55a14 CrrY OF ANDOVEI2 3/1812024 ��� �a ANOK Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701%l COLNTY, MMESOTA , (NO SCALE) NO. DATE I DESCRIPTION BY KT Y O F DOVE -A 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW_ANDOVERMN.GOV TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Joe Janish, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Public Hearin: Preliminary Plat — Andover Senior Campus - PID# 23-32-24-32- 0006 and 23-32-24-33-0002 (Applicant — JA Wedum Foundation) DATE: March 26, 2024 INTRODUCTION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review a Preliminary Plat for Andover Senior Campus. DISCUSSION Conformance with Local Plans and Ordinances 1. The property is located in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). 2. The applicant has proposed 1.5 acre Neighborhood Business (NB) lot and the remaining property is Multiple Dwelling High Density (M-3) District. This is consistent with the most recent Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed a Planned Unit Development for this property as the prior agenda item and the Preliminary Plat (if approved) will be incorporated as part of the PUD. Street Access The proposed street access is consistent with the PUD. Internal Roadways: The applicant is proposing private drives as part of the development. These private drives would include a width of 24 feet across or larger. Construction, and maintenance will be the responsibility of the owners in this area. Similar to Clocktower Commons to the north, easements will be recorded to allow ingress and egress of the parcels over each lot. Crosstown Blvd NW: The applicant will construct a right in right out. The applicant will also construct a right turn lane along Crosstown Blvd. NW. 150'h Lane NW: A right turn lane exists on Hanson Blvd. NW for the access to 1501h Lane NW. The applicant is proposing a full access, parking and access to the underground parking from 1501h Lane NW. Bluebird Street NW: This will be a full access. Crosstown Blvd NW and Bluebird Street NW: The applicant will provide coordinated participation in the construction of a roundabout at this location. Sewer and Water Access Each of the lots will be served by City of Andover municipal water and sewer. Coon Creek Watershed The applicant has submitted their information into Coon Creek Watershed and continues to work through their process. Coordination with other Agencies The developer and/or owner are responsible to obtain all necessary permits (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Coon Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and any other agency that may have an interest in the site). Initial contacts shall be made with the City Engineering Department. Tree Preservation/Landscaping The site currently has many trees. The applicant has provided a tree inventory as part of the development process and found many of the trees are not considered "significant' trees. Grading and Stormwater requirments will alter the topography which will require the removal of many of the trees. The applicant is proposing to install trees and plantings meeting our landscaping requirement and buffering requirements. Stormwater Requirements The applicant is meeting the stormwater requirements as required. Park and Recreation Commission Recommendation The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the project on March 28, 2024. Staff will provide an update on the recommendation of the Park and Recreation Commission. Lots The lots are in compliance with the PUD. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to hold a public hearing related to the preliminary plat and to make a recommendation to the City Council. Attachments Resolution of Approval 4 Resolution of Denial 6 Staff Review Comments 7 Preliminary Plat Plan Set .15 2 Respe fully 54mitted, Joe Janis Community Development Director CC: SilverCrest Development, LLC (Via Email) J.A. Wedum Foundation (Via Email) Kaas Wilson Architects (Via Email) CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO XXX A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "Andover Senior Campus" FOR PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS; PIDs: 23-32-24-32-0006 and 23-32-24-33-0002, legally described as follows: Parcel A: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south and east of County Road 18, also known as Crosstown Blvd.; except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Winslow Hills 2nd Addition and Winslow Hills 3rd Addition. Parcel B: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, JA Wedum Foundation has requested approval of a preliminary plat for "ANDOVER SENIOR CAMPUS"; and WHEREAS, the Andover Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing on said plat; and WHEREAS, as a result of such public hearing, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat to the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the Preliminary Plat of Andover Senior Campus with the following conditions: 1. City of Andover staff comments are addressed, as determined by City Engineer. 2. The applicant shall be responsible for the cost of construction of all improvements proposed as a part of the preliminary plat, unless otherwise agreed upon by City Council. 3. Prior to final plat recording at Anoka County, a development agreement acceptable to the City Attorney must be executed by the Developer. 4. Separate documents shall be required for each Vehicle Maintenance Access Area. 5. This Preliminary plat shall be part of the PUD. 6. Applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from appropriate jurisdictions and agencies in order to develop the property. 7. Applicant shall provide Association documents at time of final plat. 8. All comments from the Coon Creek Watershed District and Anoka County Highway Department (ACHD) shall be appropriately addressed. 9. For "Andover Senior Campus" the Developer shall pay Park Dedication for the commercial n property at time of final plat. 10. The residential portions shall pay Park Dedication and Trail fees by the end user prior to issuance of building permit and fee shall be based on the year the building permit is issued. 11. For "Andover Senior Campus" end users shall be required to pay sewer area, sewer connections, water area, water connections fees at time of building permit and fee shall be based on the year the building permit is issued. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 2nd day of Aprils 2024. ATTEST: Michelle Hartner, City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER: Sheri Bukkila, Mayor 5 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO XXX A RESOLUTION DENYING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "ANDOVER SENIOR CAMPUS" FOR PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS; PIDs: 23-32-24-32-0006 and 23-32-24-33-0002, legally described as follows: Parcel A: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south and east of County Road 18, also known as Crosstown Blvd.; except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Winslow Hills 2"d Addition and Winslow Hills 3rd Addition. Parcel B: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, JA Wedum Foundation has requested approval of a preliminary plat for "Andover Senior Campus"; and WHEREAS, the Andover Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing on said plat; and WHEREAS, as a result of such public hearing, the Planning Commission recommends denial of the preliminary plat to the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and denies the Preliminary Plat of "Andover Senior Campus" due to the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 2nd day April, 2024. ATTEST: Michelle Hartner, City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER: Sheri Bukkila, Mayor 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV NENORi4NDDM TO: Joe Janish, Community Development Director FROM: David Berkowitz, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Jason Law, Assistant City Engineer DATE: March 6, 2024 REFERENCE: Andover Senior Campus / Commercial Site Plan / Review #2 The following comments are regarding to Review #2• 1. (Review #1) Need to obtain the necessary permits from the Coon Creek Watershed District (Grading, Storm Water Design and Erosion Control), MPCA and MCES (Sanitary Sewer), MDH (Water Main), DOLI (utilities), Anoka County Highway Department, and/or any other agency that may be interested in the site. Provide copies of permits to City. Noted, kept for tracking. Plans submitted to ACHD and CCWD by developer. Submit updated plans /stormwater report to ACHD and CCWD. Submit copy of comments received by each agency to City. 2. (Review #1) Provide an O&M agreement for the storm sewer sump catch basins as well as all on site infiltration basins and ponding areas. Noted, kept for tracking. To be provided upon approval of stormwater management plan. 3. (Review #1) When site grading is completed an as -built grading plan shall be submitted to the City for review using Anoka County coordinates and elevation datum. Developer's engineer shall certify the site is in compliance with the approved grading plan prior to City approval. Noted, kept for tracking. 4. Sheet 24.0014PP and all applicable sheets: ROW corner radii at northwest, northeast and southwest corners of site shall be 30' radii (minimum) or greater to encompass existing utilities. Radius at northeast corner to be revised to include future trail around round about (see sheet C1.5). 5. Sheet 24.0014PP: Delete "Future" from Proposed Right of Way note along Crosstown Blvd. Label "Proposed Right of Way" along Hanson Blvd over the existing road and utility easement. 6. Sheet 24.0014PP and all applicable sheets: Include Drainage and Utility Easement in northeast corner of the site to encompass a storm sewer stub to future round about. 7. Sheet C1.1: add "Fire Access" to note for grass over reinforced mat. 8. Sheet C1.1: Label "Future Roundabout (Conceptual). 9. Sheet C1.1: Phasing note refers to red lines and shading, no red lines or shading on sheet? 10. Sheet C1.1: For the proposed right turn lane on Crosstown Blvd, add dimension labels as marked up, as well as width of proposed right in/right out pavement widths. 11. Sheet C1.3: Show turning movements for fire truck into and out of right in/right out on Crosstown Blvd. These were shown in the previous submittal. 12. Sheet L1-L5: Don't show trees that are to be removed. Keep trees and shrubs above the proposed 100-year flood elevation within all drainage and utility easements and out of the sight corner for Hanson Blvd and Crosstown Blvd and the sight triangle of the new road and Crosstown Blvd. 13. (Review #1) Sheets C2.1-C2.3: Identify areas of fill with a hatch pattern, identify in legend. Noted, to be addressed in next submittal. 14. Stormwater calculations in Hydrocad utilized amended CN values for disturbed areas. Need to address somewhere in plans how soils are to be amended in disturbed areas. 15. Sheet C2.1: General Notes are cut off on bottom. 16. Sheet C2.2 and all applicable sheets: For Low Area 4 label proposed and existing HWL's. 17.Sheet C2.2: Basin 3 and Areas 604 HWL elevations don't match Hydrocad model. 18. Sheet C2.2: For Basin 4, label the EOF as OCS rim. Currently it's called out as overland but the trail on Hanson Blvd is higher than the EOF elevation listed. 19. Sheet C2.3: Add EOF elevations for paved area low points at areas identified (all low areas). 20. Sheet C2.3: Add spot elevation for elevation between pre-treatment cell and Basin 1. 21. Sheet C2.3: Berm proposed in north corner of site may need to be removed or adjusted if ponding needs to be expanded to incorporate additional drainage area along Crosstown Blvd for future roundabout. 22. Sheet C2.3: Retaining walls over 3 feet shall have "Decorative" fences instead of split rail. 23. Sheet C2.3: Show sight corner (different from sight triangle) for the southeast quadrant of Hanson Blvd and Crosstown Blvd. No trees or shrubs are allowed in this area. 24. Sheet C3.1: Review water main under retaining wall near low area 4. Wall appears to be 13' high, which will make water main 20'+/- deep in parking lot prior to angling upwards. May want to consider a steel casing pipe under the wall in case this pipe ever has a leak or needs to be replaced in the future. Discuss with City staff. 25. Sheet C3.1: Label size, slope, and inverts for sanitary stubs to brownstones and commercial pad. 26. Sheet C3.2: For storm sewer connection into Anoka County storm sewer system on Hanson Blvd, County comment referenced preferring tying into the existing stub further south if possible. Not sure if there is enough grade to route Basin 4 there, but it may be better to route Basin 6 to the southerly stub, or also look at discharging Basin 6 into Basin 4 as marked up. 27.Sheets C3.2 & C3.3: Update pipe grades and IE's into OCS structures to improve skimming. 28. Sheets C3.2 & C3.3: Change storm sewer pipe in Crosstown Blvd ROW from 12" to 15". 29. Sheet C3.3: Storm sewer configuration between Basin 3 and Low Area 4 outlets will tend to push water south to Low Area 4. Review redlines, changing angle of pipes would promote flow north in storm sewer versus south. 30. Sheet C3.3: Provide a storm sewer stub in the north corner to the future roundabout. Extend pipe 10' past right of way. Provide calculations for 10 year flow rate in this pipe assuming all of Subcatchment INT drains to this pipe. 31. (Review #1) Sheet C4.1: There are numerous details missing from the plans, including but not limited to: typical sections / pavement insets (internal and external to site), sidewalk / trail, ped ramps, curb and gutter, concrete medians, pipe bedding installation, hydrants, gate valves, water main insultation, water main offset (if needed), water services, sanitary sewer details (MH, cleanout, pipe, etc.), rock construction entrance, retaining wall, fencing, mailbox cluster detail and concrete pad, handicap parking stalls and signage, etc. Most added, additional details as needed to be included in next submittal. 32.Sheet C4.1: Recommend changing Light Duty Bituminous Inset to 2-1.5" lifts as the 1" wearing course as currently proposed is difficult to construct. 33. Sheet C4.1: Add pavement inset for Crosstown Boulevard Turn Lane. Current pavement section for Crosstown Blvd is marked up in plans. 34. Sheet C4.1: Add column headers to Storm Sewer Structure Schedule (Structure #, Size/Detail, and Casting). 35. Sheet C4.2: Add pipe sizes to all details. Revise inlet pipes to have steeper reverse grade for skimming. Maintain minimum of 1' of concrete between front rim elevation of OCS and top of inlet pipe. Make sure changes reflected in Hydrocad models. Elevations and orifice size for Basin 3 do not match Hydrocad model. 36. Refer to redlined plan sheets for additional minor comments or those not addressed herein. 37. Identify in comment letter any changes made to plans since previous submittal not addressed in response comments. 38.Additional comments pending further review. The following Comments are regarding the Stormwater Report Review #2• 1. In the Proposed Tributary Area Map and stormwater models, include additional area shown into Subcatchment INT for future roundabout drainage. This area is for the north half of Crosstown Blvd west of the intersection that currently flows to a French Drain in the northern ditch between the road and trail west of Bluebird Street. This area will need to be picked up with storm sewer in the ultimate condition. Update text (area) in report on Page 2 of 5 under Basin 1 paragraph and associated flow rate summary tables. Show storm sewer stub in maps to Subcatchment INT. 2. In Proposed Tributary Area Map, correct labels for CB 602 and B6 low areas to match Hydrocad. Label Subcatchment 1 area as well. 3. In the proposed Hydrocad models, update inlet pipe reverse grade elevations as marked up (or something similar) to provide skimming in proposed basins. Pipe grades as proposed nearly flat into OCS structures will not provide skimming in basins. Maintain 1' of concrete (minimum) between top of inlet pipe and front rim elevation of OCS structures. Make sure revised elevations and pipe grades match plans. 4. The proposed HWL for Basin 3 and orifice diameter for Basin 3 OCS do not match the plans. 5. In the Proposed Conditions Model (Basins Starting at Bottom), carry thru above comments from HWL model. 6. Refer to marked up stormwater report for additional minor comments. 7. Additional comments pending further review. Note: It is a requirement that the Developer respond to each of these items in writing (get digital copy from City and type responses below original comment) when re -submitting the revised plans to the City. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Jason Law, Assistant City Engineer at (763) 767-5130 or David Berkowitz, Director of Public Works/City Engineer at (763) 767-5133. ft • •l�.�F•%�1 N DO VE 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV MEMORANDUM To: Joe Janish, Community Development Director From: Kameron Kytonen, Natural Resources Technician Date: March 11, 2024 Reference: Andover Senior Campus CSP Comments 1. Please show the proposed plants being planted on the actual landscape plan. This makes it easier to read to see what species are being planted where. 2. Columnar Swedish aspen is not a recommended planting choice. a. A couple recommended planting choices in its replacement includes but is not limited to blue beech and pagoda dogwood 3. Additional comments pending further review. 10 9 L C I T Y 0 F NNDOVE^ 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV TO: Michael Gould, SilverCrest FROM: Joe Janish, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Review #2 — J.A. Wedum Foundation/SilverCrest Andover Senior Campus DATE: March 12, 2024 Review #2 Comments: 101. City Council took action on March 4, 2024 related to the Comprehensive Plan. The 60 day review period has now started. 102. Provide a copy of the CCWD permit to City once approved. 103. Continue submittals and review by Anoka County Highway Department. 104. Activity within the power line easement will require approval by Power Company. 105. Luminaire/Photometric Plan is missing. This will need to be submitted as part of the Commercial Site Plan. 106. Fencing or some alternative will be required at top of retaining wall in SE corner of parking lot for IL/MC/AL facility. This fencing will have to be of quality and design to block headlights from reaching homes to the south and southeast. 107. It appears as though lots consist of each "use". The PUD will need to note that multiple structures will be on one lot. 108. An easement will need to be recorded for the private roadways. 109. A unit count (1 bedroom, 2 bedroom, etc) for all residential structures will be needed to calculate lot size to unit requirements. 110. See PUD Review comments. 111. Additional comments pending further review. LANDSCAPE PLAN 112. Please see Memorandum from Kameron Kytonen, Natural Resources Technician. AS -BUILT SURVEY/FINAL PLAN SET REQUIRED 113. An as -built survey shall be prepared showing that the site has been constructed to the approved utility and grading plan. 114. The approved final plan set must be submitted in paper and in a digital format (.dwg or .dxf). BUILDING PERMIT 115. See Commercial Building Plan Requirements handout. Also available on the Building Department web page at www.andovermn.gov. FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS 116 Additional comments pending further review. Note: It is a requirement that the Applicant respond to each of these items in writing when re -submitting the revised plat to the City. A digital copy will be emailed to you so that so that you can type responses below the original comments. If you should have any questions, please contact me at j.janish@andovermn.gov or 763-767-5140. Anoka County TRANSPORTATION DIVISION Highway Joe Janish City of Andover February 14, 2024 1685 Crosstown Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 RE: Preliminary Plat — Andover Senior Campus Dear Joe, We have reviewed the Preliminary Plat for Andover Senior Campus to be located east of CSAH 78 (Hanson Boulevard NW) and south of Crosstown Boulevard NW within the City of Andover, and I offer the following comments: • The existing right of way along CSAH 78 is 75 feet east of centerline which should be sufficient for future reconstruction purposes. • As proposed, the plat will not introduce and new access points onto county roads. Any existing driveways or field entrances within the boundaries of this development are required to be removed and the ditch section restored to match existing depth, slope, and grades. No access points onto CSAH 78 will be permitted and the right of access along CSAH 78 should be dedicated to Anoka County. • Internal site grading shall not commence until the requested ACHD Engineering plan approvals are received and the applicable permits can be issued. • Any utility relocation in the CSAH 78 right of way will be required to be coordinated directly by the city/developer. • Please note that no plantings or private signs will be permitted within the county right of way and care must be exercised when locating private signs, building, structures, plantings, berms, etc. outside of the county right of way, so as not to create any new sight obstructions for this section of CSAH 78. ACHD would like to work with local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and the county highway system. It should be recognized that residential land uses located adjacent to County highways often results in complaints about traffic noise. Existing and/or future traffic noise from CSAH 78 could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCA's Noise Area Classification (NAC) where establishment of the land use would result in violations of established noise standards. It is advised that the City and the Developer assess the noise situation for this development as it is proposed to be located directly adjacent to CSAH 78 and take the level of action deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise by incorporating the appropriate noise mitigation elements into the design and phasing of this plat as applicable. Our Passion Is Your Safe way Home 13 1440 Bunker Lake Boulevard N. N ♦ Andover. NIN 55304-4005 Office: 76:3-324-3100 ♦ Fax: 763-324-3020 ♦ wjvw anokacounty.us!highway Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer The ACHD Engineering Plan Review process will apply to this site. The following items should be submitted to Brandon Ulvenes, Engineer II, Brandon. UlvenesCcDanokacountvmn.gov (checklist and payment information are available on our website: https://www.anokacountymn.gov/4072/Development-Review): • Construction plans ■ Utility relocation plans ■ Traffic Control plans ■ Grading and erosion control plans ■ Drainage calculations — Note that the post -developed rate/volume of runoff must not exceed the pre -developed rate/volume of runoff for the 10-year critical design storm ■ ACHD Design Requirements Checklist ■ Engineering plan review fee (estimated at $150.00) If any work will be performed in the County Right of Way, a Permit for work within the County Right of Way ($150.00) must be obtained prior to the commencement of any construction. License permit bonding, methods of construction, design details, work zone traffic control, restoration requirements and follow-up inspections are typical elements of the permitting process. Contact Sue Burgmeier via phone at 763.324.3176 or via email at HighwayPermits(o)-anokacountymn.gov for further information and to coordinate the ACHD Permit process. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this review. Sincerely, Logan Keehr Traffic Engineering Technician xc: CSAH 78/Plats+Developments/2024 Jerry Auge, Assistant County Engineer David Zieglmeier, County Surveyor Sean Thiel, Traffic Engineering Manager Sue Burgmeier, Traffic Technician Brandon Ulvenes, Engineer II i q PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: ANDOVER SENIOR CAMPUS DEVELOPER ENGINEER ARCHITECT J.A. WEDUM FOUNDATION PLOWE ENGINEERING KAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS 2 CARLSON PARKWAY, STE 335 6776 LAKE DRIVE NE, STE 110 1301 AMERICAN BLVD E, STE 100 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 JAY PORTZ ADAM GINKEL SARAH KERN, AIA, COT 612-789-3363 651-361-8234 612-285.3891 JAYPORTZ@WEDUM.ORG ADAM@PLOWE.COM SARAHK@KAASWILSON.COM PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south and east of County Road 18, also known as Crosstown Blvd.; except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Winslow Hills 2nd Addition and Winslow Hills 3rd Addition. and PARCEL B: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota. NOTES - Feld survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 5/11/2022, 5/12/2022 and 1/8/2024. - Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum. - Parcel ID Number: 23-32-24-32-0006 (Parcel A) and 23-32-24-33-0002 (Parcel B). - Total boundary area - 655,508 sf (15.04 acres) Parcel area less proposed right of way dedication = 582,154 sf (13.36 acres) - Surveyed premises shown on this survey map Is In Flood Zone X (Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.), according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Community No. 270689 Panel No. 0306 Suffix E by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date December 16, 2015. - Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. - This survey was prepared using a commitment for title Insurance prepared by Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Commitment No. 680387, dated effective June 20, 2023. - Site Plan by Kaas Wilson Architects • Civil Plan by Plowe Engineering. LEGEND • DENOTESIRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED Pius DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS* 41578 ♦ DENOTES SET PKNAIL PROPOSED LOT 1 = 319,653 SF O DENOTES CATCH BASIN PROPOSED LOT 2 = 103,384 SF 13 DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX PROPOSED LOT 3 = 65,341 SF m DENOTES ELECTRICAL MANHOLE PROPOSED LOT 4 = 92,550 SF 13 DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOX PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY = 74,580 SF d DENOTES LIGHT POLE TOTAL PARCEL AREA = 655,508 SF IL DENOTES POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES m DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ZONING v DENOTES SIGN pd DENOTES GAS VALVE Per City of Andover Zoning Map dated 4, DENOTES STORM SEWER APRON November 2023 this site Is currently zoned M-2 P4 DENOTES WATER VALVE (Multiple Dwelling High -Low Density). m DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL M-2 Buildino Lot Standards: E DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE Min. Lot Width = 150 feet —�— DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE Min. Lot Depth = I50 feet DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER aBuil Mx. dinHeight 9 Hei9 t = feet —> DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER Max. Building Coverage = 30% i DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN M-2 Building Setbacks: r —1 DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE Front = 40 feet --( Slde (interior) = 30 feet L-_._7 DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE Slde (street) = 30 feet DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION Rear = 30 feet - .�'•-_^': DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS Any yard from County Road = 50 feet DENOTES ADJACENT PARCEL OWNER INFORMATION (PER ANOKA COUNTY TAX INFORMATION) I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. JASON,L_BJ.O Date: 3/18/2024 License No. 41578 Professional Land Surveyors www.egrud.com 6776 Lake Drive NE Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55614 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 VICINITY MAP PART OF SEC. 23, TWP. 32, RNG. 24 ® BtuEe arNh_ ioir �xa` de Nax 4� sm u � +sorv.x CITY OF ANDOVER ANOKA COLNTY, AMESOTA NO SCALE) I I I I I II �I TYPICAL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS / DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: -_ BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING ALL RIGHT \ / OF WAY AND EXTERIOR LOT LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. R P \ LOT 3� AREA < o oer'4pt1 OJT '� L I �• AF' 4, yt�A9tYP"L3O QqP jeSGYPj.os� i L 1 - Ns 9 � SJ. IIiI uvfi£w I _ I I I I I .I ? I I I I I E 1 _ I I FaI4AGE AND DTILItt EASENErv' / T ROAD AND UrlU M. DOC. W. 78808E __�_ FUTURE ROUND-ALKx/T ADDITIONAL IMY REQUIRE I RIGNf OF WAY DEDIGTION 1 1I I ea I I NORTH c I ti I N GRAPHIC SCALE 0 30 60 120 1 I I INCH = 60 FEET 1 BENCHMARK ANOKA COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. 2031 ELEVATION: 898.60 (NAVD 88 DATUM) �///y/�,•L <b �.Hf' \ \ 11 AC P�3rE (.-r is \ { _ Ir —Tpvy — r LOT AREA \ ___,,.____ ,,:_-___�.,��-____..•... `` fA 01 / op 1•.33 319,973 SF PROPOSED `� i 'wr" .937.24 BULONG 3) 'R"2x S8MO-29S GARAGE FLOOR = ) I \ T / \\ .. \ 62 \ -r •- / FIRST FLOOR=908.25 8.25P1. ,��\ / i \ !•\\ f Op`J%�/ M E marwc `\ •`EXCEPTION I , xovs See-2021 s • ..._ �� I • E%`CEP •ION I I I sr _ T 4 -Zp; - $ 150TN L %=- NW (PUBLIC ROAD) DMWN BY: BAB JOB NO: 3W016PR DATE: J/W20N II CHECK BY;" JE0. DEID ORFN: BN/y — A•A RL.1a�.ylli�•I#Y4:lly1pl0 15 ANDOVER SENIOR CAMPUS TITLE SHEET & LEGEND ANDOVER, MINNESOTA LEGEND 0 DENOTES DUSTING CATCH BASIN 0 DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX 0 DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL MANHOLE 0 DENOTES EXISTING FIBER OPTIC BOX Q DENOTES EXISTING LIGHT POLE lb DENOTES EXISTING POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES ® DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE T DENOTES EXISTING SIGN DENOTES EXISTING GAS VALVE 4$ DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER APRON N DENOTES EXISTING WATER VALVE M DENOTES DUSTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL —E-- DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE —r✓s— DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS LINE —�— DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER —>� DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER —I— DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN L r - J DENOTES DUSTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE )--a DENOTES EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE •aM.M DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES PROPOSED WATER PIPE DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PIPE DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE ® DENOTES PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE 0 DENOTES PROPOSED CATCH BASIN Q DENOTES PROPOSED FLARED -END SECTION = DENOTES PROPOSED GATE VALVE DENOTES PROPOSED HYDRANT 5 DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR 0. 0 DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (G—ERLINE, SMMINOUS SU—M, OR GROUND 40Y SURFACE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED) DENOTES PROPOSED DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FENCE •— DENOTES PROPOSED TREE PROTECTION FENCE DENOTES PROPOSED BIOROLIS DENOTES MAINTENANCE ACCESS ROUTE ® DENOTES PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION ® DENOTES PROPOSED RIP -RAP ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD 88 DATUM GRAPHIC SCALE 80 0 as 80 180 I. —.FEET (w a N') VICINITY MAP ( NOT TO SCALE) AN MPCA NPDES CONSTRUCTION PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION ALL PERMITS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PERMITS FROM CITY OF ANDOVER, MNOOT, AND THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, SHALL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO ORDERING OF MATERIAL AND STARTING OF CONSTRUCTION. NO INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES SHALL BE PERMITTED UNTIL ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS ARE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES SMALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND CITY STANDARDS AS IDENTIFIED IN THE PUBLIC WORKSIENGINEERING STANDARDS. SHEET INDEX CO TITLE SHEET 6 LEGEND CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY / TREE INVENTORY - SHEET 1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 1 TREE INVENTORY -SHEET 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT CIA CIVIL SITE PLAN C12 REMOVALS PLAN C7.3 FIRE TRUCK MOVEMENTS C1A CURBING PLAN C1.5 CONCEPT ROUNDABOUT L1-L5 DETAILS C2.1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN - OVERALL C22 GRADING DETAIL - 1 C2.3 GRADING DETAIL-2 C2A SWPPP C3.1 UTILITY PLAN -SANITARY 6 WATERMAIN C32 UTILITY PLAN - STORM SEWER - SHEET 1 C32 UTILITY PLAN - STORM SEWER-SHEET2 C4.1 -C4.6 DETAILS CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY/ TREEINVENTORY I -for- J.A. WEDUM FOUNDATION -of- ANDOVER SENIOR CAMPUS II I PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: That part of the Northwest Quarter of me Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south and east Of County Road 18, also known as Crosstown Blvd.; except [ha[ part platted as Winslow Hills, Winslow Hills 2nd Addition and Winslow Hills 3rd Addition. and PARCEL B: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, except that part platted as Winslow HMIs, Anoka County, Minnesota, NOTES Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 5/11/2022, 5/12/2022 and 1/8/2024. - Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum. - Parcel ID Number: 23-32-24-32-0006 (Parcel A) and 23-32-24-33-0002 (Parcel B). - Total boundary area = 655,508 sf (15.04 acres) Parcel area less proposed right of way dedication = 582,154 sf (13.36 acres) - Surveyed premises shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone X (Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.), according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Community No. 270689 Panel No. 0306 Suffix E by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date December 16, 2015. Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. - This survey was prepared using a commitment for title Insurance prepared by Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Commitment No. 645244, dated effective August 20, 2021. Tree tagging and inventory completed by lacobson Environmental. LEGEND • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLSx 41578 ♦ DENOTES SET PKNAIL I " ❑ DENOTES CATCH BASIN El DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX m DENOTES ELECTRICAL MANHOLE El DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOX 0 DENOTES LIGHT POLE , n], DENOTES POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES ® DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE — DENOTES SIGN DENOTES GAS VALVE ADJACENT HOUSE ELEVATIONS ( DENOTES STORM SEWER APRON ' log DENOTES WATER VALVE MAIN = MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION 133 DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL L/= LOWEST OPENING ELEVATION (LOOKOUT BASEMENT) I E DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE LIFO - LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION (WALKOUT BASEMENT) —aAs— DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE NOTE: THE LOCATION OF THE ADJACENT HOUSES/SHEDS DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY ARE APPROXIMATE PER AERIAL —> DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER PHOTO. THE MOUSES/SHEDS WERE NOT LOCATED IN THE ' DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN FIELD' I r — DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE L_ J r -� DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE •+six DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES ADJACENT PARCEL OWNER INFORMATION ,M•r:wiar'� (PER ANOKA COUNTY TAX INFORMATION) TREE DETAIL -------- DENOTES TAG NUMBER (SEE SHEET 2 FOR TREE INFO) I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. JASOkZjiWb Date: 2/7/2024 License No. 41578 Professional Land Surveyors wwW.egrud.com 6776 Lake Drive NE Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55614 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361.8701 C:WSErS\BDY,.- r)PRENOtE JC:'. ,J4PP.OWG � •.�•: •' ,P' ;/:`ems• ; ,, _•ram; - \ \ lob. � � � •,! y` � . � �` �A �•Y. � \\ ffi NORTH 1 7i w . � r., > c GRAPHIC SCALE EO 0 30 :i0 120 II S 7 rl ».,». nix-x.-sxaoxs :'J' ..''•...... :. t .,»., .cox a-°,•:^� s ,,, '�°�•••�• 1 INCH = 80 FEET yea 't BENCHMARK � w ANOKA COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. 2031 ♦y' ' r �i ,�' ffi' '� ••" ELEVATION: 898.60 (NAVD 88 DATUM) '�":;�` ` � w • � � •�`' � AM- ), � / .t��ose .�e;,o�o .rx ',..$ > �..'q.� �� ff ;` . :r�. • .,». .cow w. r, \:'...,_, - w., 6 J Jr .ems' sY>' .` NG � � ��y? •w.s .:ww.s • � r! .ra .wa • ,\ \ C J 1 - R � •��'„ jT��C tt .s, .»u .cow • �'`�j .w„ �� \ ,D~ _ /�,$� ``) ` --� o/ , .ra t•�O. /, .cox ..w, • .rA .rx .wa ,� O �' w,a - � 7 \ , , ..,WAY' EA-G"' FaR s, •NOW .»:a .»u I .w,: •r, '0 q1p 11t6' ROADWAY, DPAIrWGE, UTILnY,. r, • ) . '•`SLuK, SIDEwAiJ . TRAIL SNOW .»„ t ` - ._ •' �* / . 'op STOMGE. SIGNING AND STORM .,ma __SOUnf5 E OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE r •w„ • • a _ _ SEWER PER DOC NO. 2202724.007 .; •"' AND 2202724,008 i SW 1/40F SEC. 23, T.32,R2.•»„ g`• ;sp.r.r, 'b .w. .r.s .»°, __NORTHUNEOFTNe+4111/40fTHE , ........` . g •` : SW 1/4 OF SEC. 23, T.32, R.24 e PERIM..!..._ F7 +y� Hi x ~NENT EASEMEFOR �] 0 } \ DRNNAGE;ySLOPE, SIDEWAIJL%'�sw .»„ • ` ,-9a 'Mffi y�,�..' ,»aW TRAIL SNOW.4TORAGE, •r, •»w°., I ,: •�.........`�.. '....' 'Y \ , s jj .cow AND STORM SEWER PER DOC NO: .w r .wr, •wa \� IIn 2202724.Dm ANU'j202)2L,0pa ,ry .' •f0.• % ... - 9oa' pp da _ .. cTN" s wwN� iwa :, r. i !! ® ...... - _... a,wr �'c1,7 P,rrx : ffi.. r u 7— Milli, k / cox �j 10 »� cox ffi ffiffi ffi, 9R xg, P \ / Tt�t \ •'¢ 18. IRe » » .s i / S^ .t I • E xCE PTI'ON ::._._.. F� : r yr p1Op..»!4...._......_.. _. ... g .ra �; 7A +�� edh �.•�. ,' rap , � , _... o'Y�, �, CE -F\ *YG��e z` .,»., _�j ••I� ms� �iI I I.,:' Ex fIION a, a ��'�' / , L�...---9M--._.. w: :e: b'ax:x�liaos7 w r. xsv.ztvayse ..•r. J}.w5i-M4 .� -- ........... -- 15OTP LANE NW �� — — [MAWN BY; BAB JOB NO: 240011PP DATE: 1/9/2024 CHECK BY: JER F1BDCREW: BN/al 1 277/2024 I CITY COMMENTS 9AB aJ 4PP a RJR 3SSSSSB'm'm. $;S �8SS888888&8'=''=8S P�n�mmP����bnsssp�a�����s•�n ��a mg ... NN N.N.N NNNm+ ....... rvN b.NNNNN.NNNm.NMNNNN.NNNN. e NTN NNNNMN..N...M..NNNNNNNNNNNbNMNNNN.NN.N.NN 0 88888888888882228882888888829892 882828292888822222888888888888888888888 $888888222882288822288888 ! P man ,•,smsn�.c�smPzpa�mbsb msn+ nabaP�b�b�sm ..an Psnsam msn�b PssP ns�.aPaPam «ab nannaP o z �E yYY �ap fpCC W pp�� gg f�y1 yy�� yyi�pp �(qq 4qI�QQ �y f�¢QC gg pp �y�y CQBppqq YYyy��QQ ,q¢� pp pp!!��gY pp;;QQrr ggpp ��pp pp gy�ypp 8gppggm QQ f�L( f��Q gp SCp N N N N. N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 8885888882S8888888 88888S8S29222222888888588888892888888822222888822 828882222222222222S2S8888S222 ro$e' c '�m P�.+ b.bj. � m nsn bsP,'�ysPaaPs.�b n� �P�mn ^,�m b',f' P b�n baaasP .niaab^�abPn ,ny �.� sn O E A ����MMMM�mmwaiTmme'n�min �pC g�@ gg ryry $ii in�nii yy�� pppppp��qq��Q i�in in Ml i+l ��yyppY r�i i.f in i+i g �i:f "wZ �i+1 QQQ i71«�� e� Y �i71�«��Fi u�g QQ !!yy Y.iin:r{�X���i.{in ;;]] y r;;]]¢¢g aS�fi !ny q�p �7R ;;QQrr �fifi yp aS �Qpp aS Mi c�+ M in Min�nmm��A{r7i pp (��yg Ai�a{�r7{r7i�tX gpp QQ Xi �'Ai�?'A y �i 71i��'%i gp qQp Xi i u C C 0 N88822298 8922988828828S28282282282SS224292S2 S XBS1!SSSSS88SSSSSSSMBSSSS88S°888S88S8888888888885882 e n n P ,may m n O T E y. iC }y yyip 74 F �q N gp 76 {p N s N n n n n r�i r"i rv� gg i� �y n N '7 �pq i� ggqq��QQ `ri N M7 iJ ��yy "� iV �@g iJ qgpQQ eJ iJ rvg .+�. n $ r�v� r3 �ry gg N ryry IQ N ygyy��qq W N N ap i� N ,qQqq N F y 1$ ni y A �Q Ff rrap@@ F Ff F iv r�i « H �n };, @@¢� N Fr p iV TJ gyp }9 R Yang TJ F A TJ g7 TS pQ Fi Xl �+Y Fl XI �p �Q XI Ml CC �q¢p N iV XI of a .mmNNN Pv a vN P vPa-- .v �n N N N b N P N N. a N P N N .. N. N m a. N N N. N N N N N N N a .. a ..... m. m .. m. N N w� P m N m ....... e 6 NaSS3�SS8S�SSS5SS8S8888S88S8888S�8S8SSS8a'�da��a8aaaaaasaaaaas�BSSS�S8S888S88S8SYS88SS8SSSS�SSSSSSSSSSS �nx::abas�eaNaa�Paaanaasmnn «sanmT�snn ma.n bsmmnbnsPmRmsnamssass�as asassabn 8 E W N E N O Z O r O 1. Q Qtjo z Q (y7�n _ c $ ��_ CnLL, =erg;� o O cmZ Z`n R a O CC_0 E �axu?a6�wom o� 8 x Z o c W Wog=k Z w �aa3��3m3ua u 28u > x f LL W nnn �CCa = N �g3un3m3ua L LL a N — u NP G � W o � o viN j W U)Mm p �JJ O'n 0 r- C -- Q ac~cJ W� T E W O 1 u 0 ca PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: ANDOVER SENIOR CAMPUS DEVELOPER ENGINEER ARCHITECT J.A. WEDUM FOUNDATION PLOWE ENGINEERING KARS WILSON ARCHITECTS 2 CARLSON PARKWAY, STE 335 6776 LAKE DRIVE NE, STE 110 1301 AMERICAN BLVD E, STE 100 PLYMOUTH, MN S5447 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 JAY PORTZ ADAM GINKEL SARAH KERN, AIA, CDT 612-789-3363 651-361-8234 612-285-3891 JAYPORTZ@WEDUM.ORG ADAMOPLOWE.COM SARAHK@KAASWILSON.COM PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south and east of County Road 18, also known as Crosstown Blvd.; except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Winslow Hills 2nd Addition and Winslow Hills 3rd Addition. and PARCEL B: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota. NOTES - Feld survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 5/11/2022, 5/12/2022 and 1/8/2024. - Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum. - Parcel ID Number: 23-32-24-32-0006 (Parcel A) and 23-32.24-33-0002 (Parcel 6). - Total boundary area - 655,508 sf (15.04 acres) Parcel area less proposed right of way dedication = 582,154 sf (13.36 acres) - Surveyed premises shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone X (Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.), according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Community No. 270689 Panel No. 0306 Suffix E by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date December 16, 2015. - Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. • This survey was prepared using a commitment for title Insurance prepared by Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Commitment No. 645244, dated effective August 20, 2021. - Site Plan by Kaas Wilson Architects - Civil Plan by Plowe Engineering. LEGEND* DENOTES IRON ELED MONUMENT FOUND AS BRLSF AREAS O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED 41578 • DENOTES SET PKNAIL PROPOSED LOT 1 = 319,973 SF ❑ DENOTES CATCH BASIN PROPOSED LOT 2 = 103,384 SF ID DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX PROPOSED LOT 3 = 57, 729 SF m DENOTES ELECTRICAL MANHOLE PROPOSED LOT 4 = 101'068 SF O DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOX PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY = 73.354 SF 0 DENOTES LIGHT POLE TOTAL PARCEL AREA = 655,508 SF `d. DENOTES POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES m DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE T DENOTES SIGN ZONING pit DENOTES GAS VALVE Per City of Andover Zoning Map dated 4E DENOTES STORM SEWER APRON November 2023 this site is currently zoned M-2 04 DENOTES WATER VALVE (Multiple Dwelling High -Low Density). m DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL M-2 Building Lot Standards: t DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE Min. Lot Width = 150 feet —us— DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE Min. Lot Depth - 150 feet — DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER Max. Building Height - 35 feet —> DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER Max. Building Coverage = 30% DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN M-2 Building Setbacks: r — DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE Front = 40 feet r-=1 Side (interior) = 30 feet L_ =, j DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE Side (street) = 30 feet . rsx.x DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION Rear = 30 feet "•�`^�"' DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS ..... ............... Any yard from County Road = 50 feet D„a,�,"y'Au°4'00v DENOTES ADJACENT PARCEL OWNER INFORMATION Amy: ulrPr (PER ANOKA COUNTY TAX INFORMATION) I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under ".laws of the State of Minnesota. JASOkZ_a1JD Date: 2/28/2024 License No•41578 Professional Land Surveyors www.egrud.com 6776 Lake Drive NE Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55614 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-6701 VICINITY MAP PART OF SEC. 23, TWP. 32, RNG. 24 ,JEe Jr4M1 x eA J^Y 9RE � rai > FA r54M •-� CITY OF ANDOVER ANOKA COINTY, M NESOTA (NO SCALE) TYPICAL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: — — — — BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING ALL RIGHT ' �- OF WAY AND EXTERIOR LOT LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. \ /` _ J J�A SRrO•ae'p�zs `�p�P�Vy�fp��"9 yar �iI JL II �OZ�Ol 1 I� II 0M 0;' I l57.911° j,- i1 II I' I I I I I I I I I I — — F — DRAINAGE AND III I H, EASEMENT ID UnLTTY MO.]88o86 / 4,,f LOT 3 ARFA .33 AC) 1 / cpsN 6>i \ 32 PCy� ____/_ / ` RJiURE 0.0l1t1D-ABOUr MAY REQUIRE ADDmONAL I RIGHr OF wAv DEDIUnON 1 _ I I I I NORTH I y I I GRAPHIC SCALE 6J o 30 60 120 I I 1 INCH = BO FEET 1 BENCHMARK wT*P. ANOKA COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. 2031 ELEVATION: 898.60 (NAVO 88 DATUM) /Oy 1 vv �T" , � s / LOT.---- ' 319,973 SF \ \ I 1 .291 PROPOSED p.35 AC) \ i tL0-AEA4 / •} I I 537.24 BUILDING RAGE FLOOR 900 FIRST FLOOR =08.25 \ I ab 1= q .Ili i EXCEPTION I ry 21 �xovse` _I A� EX�CE PITION i II --�- A=1'07'S7- 0 . $ 150714 L4AE NW 1 1 (PUBLIC ROAD) /1 DRAWN BY: BAB JOB ND: 240014PP DATE: VW2024 CHECK BY: JER FIEU)CREW: aW. 1 r2s/20241 CRv COMMENrS eAB 3 Nc. 1 DATE DESCRI—N BY LEGEND ❑ DENOTES EXISTING CATCH BASIN 0 DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX m DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL MANHOLE 0 DENOTES EXISTING FIBER OPTIC BOX d DENOTES EXISTING LIGHT POLE •O, DENOTES EXISTING POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES ® DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE v DENOTES EXISTING SIGN p0 DENOTES EXISTING GAS VALVE 41 DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER APRON N DENOTES EXISTING WATER VALVE III DENOTES EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL —r— DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE —� DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS LINE —� DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER —>� DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER —I— DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN r DENOTES EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE . x,x DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS - - - - - - DENOTES EXISTING EASEMENT LINES MISCELLANEOUS NOTES 1. THERE ARE NO WETLANDS ONSITE. 2. THERE IS NO FLOODPLAN ONSITE. 3. EXISTING ZONING: M2 -MULTIPLE DWELLING LOW DENSITY 4. SITE AREAS 4.1. 'TOTAL SITE AREA = 582,154 SF (13.364 ACRES) 4.2. BUILDING COVERAGE = 146,575 SF (3.300 ACRES) 25.18% 4.3. BITUMINOUS COVERAGE - 106,855 SF (2.453 ACRES) 18.36% 4.4. CONCRETE COVERAGE : 22,689 SF (0.521 ACRES) 3.90% 4.5. PERVIOUS COVERAGE : 306,035 SF (7.026 ACRES) 52.56% • TOTAL SITE AREA ASSUMES DEDIC4770N FOR 60-FT R/W ALONG CROSSTOWN BLVD AND 2S-FT FOR WIN ALONG HANSON BLVD GENERALNOTES 1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO SE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL IS LEVEL D PER Cl I ASCE 38-02. 2. CALL'811" FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE. ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATKNIS. 4. INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES (MOST CURRENT EDITION) AND MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (MOST CURRENT EDITION). 5. STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR "THIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 6. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 7. ALL STREET SIGNS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD.) a. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. DEVELOPER J.A. WEDUM FOUNDATION TWO CARLSON PARKWAY STE 335 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 JAY PORTZ 612-789-3363 IAYPORTZ@WEDUM.ORG ENGINEER PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC 6776 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 ADAM GINKEL, P.E. ES1-361-8234 ADAM@PLOWE.COM SURVEYOR E.G. RUD S SONS LAND SURVEYING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRNE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 JASON RUD 651-361-8225 JRUDOEGRUD.CDM ARCHITECT SARAH KERN, ALA, CDT KAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS 1301 AMERICAN BLVD E STE 100 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 612-285-3891 SARAHK@KAAS W ILSON.COM LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south and east of County Road 18, also known as Crosstown Blvd.; except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Winslow Hills 2nd Addition and Winslow Hills 3rd Addition. and PARCEL B: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota. >/ / GRAPHIC SCALE / 60 0 ( 30 60 120 / / 1 N0N Fa0 1 1Rr '. 4vvivc I cN R PLOWE 1PROVIDE ' ENGINEERING, INC. TRUNCATEDDOMES - _ - - FOR THESE PED RAMPS AT SITSUIT CROSSTOWN BLVD / / �\ I BTIB LANE DRIVE 110 / INTERSECTION\`¢ / y'•,. - I LINO LAKES. MN S`A14 LINO AK P1 11381 FAX: (151)31d0I I - /DRAWN A3° I BY: AGG MOE BY : EXISTING MEDIA o / '� / A I I JOB NO: DATE STRIPING: IT") / , / ,( .R / \ o - I 22-2050 12/11/23 I DASHED RED U NO I EPRESENTS I RE SIR \ \ STRU ON I II I I PROPOSED 8-FT WIDE / /'i \ % BITUMINOUS TRAIL ALONG CROSSTOWN BLVDa BLUEBIRD ST- � i f \ 15TdtY JYw' \ 2IIra13 N '14.0 Q / RETANNG 138UMT5 ) i \ • yr/ ...YYY \ / �y UNITED I Q / I f ' R36 M. R2S ♦ �\ ... = I// noRW \ \ --• �---- ---- *a ----_"'— ----- -----• ItV' I All 33 _< .I PROPOSED BFT WIDE ) ri' a / \ , / 3 Z w NCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP. FOR RETANNG \ / C Z. w a'1 1�. rI INTERNAL WALKWAYS) I -� wALI I, I Iony Z_ >QT . < k EXCEP ION \ S .` .� ARE TO BACK GRASS OVER REINFORCED �/� ` ga\ i \ /,/ j .• ,�ma \ / 1P OI , MAT (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DETAIL) _/_ //' j I ,.. I I a. �i —n , e---- -- y--.---- __ I I I o Z F .e>: ----lr---------- Z — —r I — — — — — — — — — — — -� I (A J o Uj I 2i 1 id i� w I I E X C E P� 10 N' ® I xaiu rE I Z I € I PrR W r (5 uj I I v I I I 'o j o LUZ U a EXISTING PEP H RHOOD _ — MO M PIT SIGN ��- • STOP SKIN — 0 —I a Z 150TW LAI\E NW Q (PUBLIC ROAD) — — — — — — — — — — — — — - 2- ! I ( C1.1 LEGEND I / GRAPHIC SCALE ❑ DENOTES EXISTING CATCH BASIN 0 DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX I I / / 1 NCB W FEET m DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL MANHOLE EI DENOTES EXISTING FIBER OPTIC BOX �) ° O DENOTES EXISTING LIGHT POLE I - / • /'ys / II ✓ 77/ DENOTES EXISTING POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES i ® DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES EXISTING SIGN DENOTES EXISTING GAS VALVE ( DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER APRON I I ' •\ • ' ♦ I ... •s• - \ I� D0 DENOTES EXISTING WATER VALVE / •' �� ,• s I M DENOTES EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL - \ P' `•dl.. —e— DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE `` y 1t``•y� •� - \ snE aunnwc �+•s— DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS LINE I _ sb� . i1� �,. •+°' 1 DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PLOW Ei DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWE0. ENGINEERING, IN( I _ _ y' •f s�', �- I —I-- DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN xlp°•`` • - I O � — J DENOTES EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE I �°, S��>� 87I6 LAKE ORME �? 110 DENOTES EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE I ® ® ' ,woe ' .0+. SURELINO LAKES. MN SSD' ..?+. I AK — � J i ' 1 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION --_-__ DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS Fvlcriur. ruww eun rlirrvo _ • I'°"� ... ` / :BP.Y ' I I FAX: 1A5i1361A7o1 GENERALNOTES 1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL IS LEVEL D PER Cl I ASCE 3842. 2. CALL •811' FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS. 4. INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CRY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES (MOST CURRENT EDITION) AND MNOOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (MOST CURRENT EDITION). 5. STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 6. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 7. ALL STREET SIGNS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE M94NESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD.) 8. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE. AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTLITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTUTY COMPANY. GRADING, DRAINAGE & ESC NOTES 1. PROJECT LIES WITHIN COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT (CCWD.) A CCWD PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY SITE DISTURBANCE. 2. PROJECT DISTURBS MORE THAN ONE (1) ACRE. AN NPDES PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY SITE DISTURBANCE. 3. THERE ARE NO WETLANDS ONS(TE. 4. THIS SITE IS LISTED IN FLOOD ZONE •X• PER FEMA MAPPING. 5. TREE TAGGING AND INVENTORY BY JACOBSON ENVIRONMENTAL. 6. FIELD SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY E.G. RUD AND SONS LAND SURVEYING, INC. ON 541-2022 AND 5-12-2022. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE CATCH BASIN INLET SEDIMENT PROTECTION PRIOR TO WINTER FREEZE AND REPLACE N SPRING IF SITE STABILIZATION HAS NOT BEEN ACHIEVED, OR AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY ENGINEER. 8. DEVELOPERICONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT VEGETATION. 9. DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SITE STABILIZATION, INCLUDING ON ANY STOCKPILES. WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF GRADING COMPLETION OR INACTIVITY. 10. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE 4:1 OR FLATTER. 150774 L AE NW PU ( L - 6UC ROAD) D G� - — EXISTING CURB AND — — TO BE REMOVED FOR NEW 1 / ENTRANCE PAVEMENT REMOVALS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER TO BE REMOVED FOR NEW ENTRANCE T _ 22-2050 LEGEND ❑ DENOTES EXISTING CATCH BASIN 0 DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX (D DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL MANHOLE 13 DENOTES EXISTING FIBER OPTIC BOX O DENOTES EXISTING LIGHT POLE `D+ DENOTES EXISTING POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES ® DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES EXISTING SIGN p0 DENOTES EXISTING GAS VALVE DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER APRON K DENOTES EXISTING WATER VALVE III DENOTES EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL e DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE — DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS LINE —>— DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER —>�— DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER —I— DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN r — DENOTES EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE •.=s>' DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS GENERALNOTES 1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAXNG HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL IS LEVEL D PER Cl IASCE 3M2. 2. CALL'811' FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SEE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS. <. INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES (MOST CURRENT EDITION) AND MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (MOST CURRENT EDITION). 5. STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 6. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 68 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 7. ALL STREET SIGNS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MNNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD.) 8. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. a.er snT i +sc (1- Ar Im• (+bT (3NT (bT (tar) o aoiN 4s°r (e7.2)) °�eoP`B0°7maXl�¢rwarla � i3.�iT iwac ao1H e.� +w7 -,D-IDCR 1ML Purmbra. -1— Cr A. f 1' Ade Tf— 62 92 n WPeel oft L .68. Tm WgBy. 18.3 n. _ _.... _ •.. r.... cI,— D—,.v 78 n. • AtlBkaW Bi Deem Fran) U'emn9. 133.1 n Caicul.wd Turning Radii: tr Tum 251 10 n. cu w c 41 R. 8 n. �• WrwiuY 488.5n .....w �oPLwD Oa.uiptiorlo.klipwn Axle From. Gu+tam 0506808 Ask. Fmn OMMnri TANJ. Non Drrvc. 24 DOO E. Ve y Wieela FrM 0019511 Wtx F— Aka. 22 S7 x 1225' Autn,a H , P,o Tres. Front Oer7592 Tees Flom. Gcod— G296 MSA 42S65R22 W 20 Ply. Fae S— L—I 9rnpms 0123525 9Vmper. IV E— A—,D— 0657jo1 AarW. 100 P— ft"— 35 MPH .- Raey dOGtF T;, L-A Albwn+u CITY OF ANDOVER AERIAL LADDER TRUCK 1/10/22 STANDARD DRAWING CITY OF NO 522 Z C 'wg'o m Q' / GRAPHIC SCALE / 60 0 30 60 120 / 1NI=60FEET 1\/ A, 1 I I I I I \ Y04 - \ . I / \b \ I li \ EXCEPTION aasan � I `I I I — -- — — ,I --——T—_----�I I�! i -- — — — — I — — — — — msnw I I EX`CEPIf ION nv I ® a L � I I I 50TW LAI1E NW (PUBLIC ROAD) — — — — — — — — — — — I I LEGEND 0 DENOTES EXISTING CATCH BASIN 0 DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX m DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL MANHOLE 0 DENOTES EXISTING FIBER OPTIC BOX d DENOTES EXISTING LIGHT POLE IL DENOTES EXISTING POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES ® DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES EXISTING SIGN DENOTES EXISTING GAS VALVE DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER APRON N DENOTES EXISTING WATER VALVE 0 DENOTES EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL -e- DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE w DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS LINE —� DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER —>� DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER —I— DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN r — DENOTES EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE . m.x DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION _�- DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS — — — — — — DENOTES EXISTING EASEMENT LINES MISCELLANEOUS NOTES 1. THERE ARE NO WETLANDS ONSITE. 2. THERE IS NO F'LOODPLAN ONSTTE. 3. EXISTING ZONING: M2 -MULTIPLE DWELLING LOW DENSITY 4. SITE AREAS 4.1. TOTAL SITE AREA =655,508 SF (15.D4 ACRES) 4.2. BUILDING COVERAGE = 148,066 SF (3.40 ACRES) 4.3. BITUMINOUS COVERAGE - 117,821 SF (2,70 ACRES) 4.4. CONCRETE COVERAGE - 23,396 SF (0.54 ACRES) 4.5. PERVIOUS COVERAGE = 366,225 SF (8.40 ACRES) GENERAL NOTES 1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL IS LEVEL D PER Cl IASCE 3M2. 2. CALL'611' FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS. 4. INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES (MOST CURRENT EDITION) AND MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (MOST CURRENT EDITION). 5. STORAGE OF MATERNLS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 6. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 7. ALL STREET SIGNS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD.) 8. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SWILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. DEVELOPER LA. WEDl1M FOUNDATION TWO CARLSON PARKWAY STE 335 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 JAY PORTZ 612-789-3363 IAYPORTZOWEDUM.ORG ENGINEER PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 ADAM GINKEL, P.E. 651-361-8234 ADAMOPLOWE.COM SURVEYOR E.G. BUD B SONS LAND SURVEYING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 IASON BUD 651.361-8225 IRUDOEGRUD.COM ARCHITECT SARAH KERN, ALA, CDT KARS WILSON ARCHITECTS 1301 AMERICAN BLVD E STE 100 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 612-285-3891 SARAHKOKAAS W ILSON.COM LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south and east of County Road 18, also known as Crosstown Blvd.; except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Winslow Hills 2nd Addition and Winslow Hills 3rd Addition. and PARCEL B: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota. GRAPHIC SCALE 60 0 1 30 60 120 1 "FT2 FEEi 1LM ) \ ZERO C `••,CONCRETE Y1IAN - - -8412 CONIC. C4, - 1D-FT TAPER TO ZERO CURB HT �\ Nb ALL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER R B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED EXCEPTION EXCEPM1ION ' L® I •p4R �! I I I II � I IF1107IM-11, I 150T14 LIME NW (PUBLIC ROAD) -- - - - - - - 1 � I I I LEGEND ❑ DENOTES EXISTING CATCH BASIN ® DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX m DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL MANHOLE El DENOTES EXISTING FIBER OPTIC BOX C DENOTES EXISTING LIGHT POLE `O+ DENOTES EXISTING POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES ® DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES EXISTING SIGN pd DENOTES EXISTING GAS VALVE ( DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER APRON DG DENOTES EXISTING WATER VALVE m DENOTES EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL -t DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE — DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS LINE —>— DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER »— DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER I DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN r — 1 DENOTES EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE •m> DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS — — — — — — DENOTES EXISTING EASEMENT LINES / / / / / / / / / / / GRAPHIC SCALE / 30 0 15 30 60 ]0 FEET -I-,- / / / / A_GNEERNG / PLOWE ENGINEERING, N 6776 SURE�EDRNE LM LAKES. MN 550 / PHONE: (651) 361-0 FAX, (651) 361A101 DRAWN BY:j AGGNo CHECK MOE / D121111 22ATE -m / / / / / / / / / / / / 5.0 / / / I z_ D m< � w-w 0 a�= aw =10wN ULLF CZ >>OI I o J x I W plow a I D_ y I a Z) I < 0 am Uo Q m 0 I oZ � I z� o w il� EL I Ld I >< z 0 0 0 U Z I Q I 2 I SHEET \ C1.5 PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER CITY CONIFERS —0AB Ables balsamea Balsam Fir b' Hgl. B&B 5 01. Pi... glauca' Densata' Black Hills Spruce 6Hgt. B&B 13 DECIDUOUS OVERSTORY TREE OAS Acer+freeman. -Sienna' Sienna Glen Map. 2' Cal. B&B 11 BR Belula nigra River Bitch 6' Hgl B&B 8 CO Cellls occidentalis Common H.ckbeny 2' Cal. B&B 6 �..A� 011 GWditSW-aca.t!i i—ts-Skycole TM Skyline Thomless Honey Locusl T Cal. B&B 8 PE Populus Iremula' Erect,' Columnar Swedish Aspen 2' Cal. B&B 5 PT PoWlus tremuloides Quakirg Aspen 2'Ca1. B&B 7 US ll- amoncana'St Croix' Sl. Croix AmMcan Elm 2.5'Cal, B&B d + �LJ c' ORNAMENTALTREES Al Amelanchier grandlflora' Autumn Brilliance' Autumn Brilliance Sendcebeny 6'Hg1. B&B 7 MS Malus x' Spring Snow Spring Snow Crab Apple 1.5' Cal. B&B 7 PP Prunus pensylvanica Pin Cherry 1.5' Cal. B&B 7 SI Syringa retkulala' Ivory Sllk- Nory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac 1.5' Cal. B&B 13 SHRUBS ( Am Aroma melanocarpa -Morton- TM Iroquis Beauty Black Chokeloi ry 5 gal. Pot 62 �h Ci Comus --- Isanti Isanli Redos. Dogwood 3 gal. Pot 117 ODI D.-IW bolter. Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle 3 gal. (Min 18' Height) Pot 136 0 He Hydrangea arborescens Annabelle Annabelle Hydrangea 5 gal. Pot 86 x J! Junlperus chlnensls -Sea Green- Sea Green Juniper 5 gal Pot 169 ORg Rh --tic,' Gro-L-' Gro-Lox Fragrant Sumac 5 gal Pd 80 OTb Thujaoccidentalis Bail John- Technito Arborvitae 4' Height At kistallation Pot 24 TI2 ThutIaoccideniMis' Techny Gbbe- Techny Globe Arborvitae 5gal.(Min. 18-Height) Pot 30 yam® ( • ) W Vlbunum Irlloburn Bailey Compact Compact American Cranberry Bush 5 gal. (Min. 18- Height) Pot 64 ANNUALS/PERENNIALS OEp Echmaces purp— Purple Cor Jbwer 1 gal. Pot 115 0 Ho Hemerocallis x -Stela de Oro' Stella de Oro Dayfy 1 gal Pd 233 ! e 1 H. Hosta+-T-Re. T-Rex Hosta 2gal Pot 35 OX Nw Nepela x laassenii' Walkers Lox' Walkers Low Catmint 1 gal Pot 121 GRASSES '17 1(`•��L Cl Calamagosils x acutifora' Karl Foersler' Feather Reed Grass 1 gal. Pot 252 • l+� Mk Mlscanihus slnenst,'Klelne Fontaine' Kleine Fontaine EuWPa Grass 1 gal. Pot 91 -_—T (PUBLIC ROAD) _ — -- •--. OVERVIEW PLAN: SCALE: I" = 60'-O" NORTH w� CALYX DESIGN GROUP -Arm x6nH��,�E 475CLEVELAND— SURE 101A ST. PAM. MN 55— PHONE: (651) 7-sun6 y+a.swrwra�P_ a� ru14,Nc wproeeawD PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE W" 110 LWO LAXES. MN 55014 PHONE:(651) 361412/0 FAX:(651)3614701 DRAWN BY: CHECK BY: HL BH JOB NO: DATE: 22-2050 02rM4 $l� =gao ae�= ¢a'g� in j ao IJ; p5 1i rs X KA Z f KF N 7 IL aszo � a W Q J O� _Z a Z o Z LU 3 W� < y LU ul o 0 00 a W 0 a O Q a 0 Z a Z� SHEET Ll / / / / / WORK / N^\ LIMIT UNE WALL PER CNIL PLANS o o'°o o00 44 o° wig 88'''SDVV osACCENT BOULDER e ' • ,�'-eeio, s;, 90 ACCENT BOULDER PEI NOTES eq o L � 1.�. O b• j oN� ' �j''�r!'K �. a 000a • 1' • 1 : 1 . E0 oa' ••% MCA p e f o Sr FUTURE PHASE PA'IING PER CIVIL PUNS INDOOR POOL FUTURE PHASE / Xz / L Z !C C OVERSTORvTREE } EXISTING WOODS 3 G .�(= —• _. _ 1 MATCH IRE _• A� MATCH LINE --- General Notes: 1. Landscape contractor to provide a new irrigation layout plan for the property. See Irrigation Notes. 2. See Civil Engineer's plans for utilities, grading layout and requirements. 3. Contractor to coordinate any work in the right-of-way with City of Andover Public Works Department. 4. Place a minimum of 6" topsoil or slope dressing on all areas disturbed by construction,induding right-of-way boulevards, unless specified otherwise. 5. Refer to builder's specifications for additional requirements. 6. Landscape contractor is responsible for verification of soils and graded condition prior to mobilization and shall notify the General Contractor if earthwork is not acceptable. Landscape contractor is responsible for fine grading, or grade to within 1" of final set elevation. 25' 50' Knor Mutt bC101K LANDSCAPE PLAN - NORTH: sc41�: ry = �s-o" NORTff cowN PEft CALYX DESIGN GROUP 475 OLEVELAND AvE sunE 101A ST. PAM, MIN 55101 PHONE:(651) 7B&9018 �rr.ae:y�y�U:P.wm, 6 ENGNEE6'ING PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 6rr6 U DRNE su nE 110 LINO LAKES, W 55014 FH (65t65114701 0 FAX (851) M1dr01 Cl) D ca C = � o UO Z Q WW Z Z 2 _Z g z a 3 W LIJ N> Q o O o L L) 0¢ g 0 z a SHEET CALYX DESIGN GROUP Gener a I Notes: 1. Landscape contractor to provide a new irrigation layout plan for the property. See Irrigation Notes. 2. See Civil Engineer's plans for utilities, grading layout and requirements. 3. Contractor to coordinate any work in the right-of-way with City of Andover Public Works Department. 4. Place a minimum of 6" topsoil or slope dressing on all areas disturbed by construction,including right-of-way boulevards, unless specified otherwise. 5. Refer to builders specifications for additional requirements. 6. Landscape contractor is responsible for verification of soils and graded condition prior to mobilization and shall notify the General Contractor if earthwork is not acceptable. Landscape contractor is responsible for fine grading, or grade to within 1" of final set elevation. O 25, 50' 15, LANDSCAPE PLAN -SOUTH: sG�: I" = 2s-o° NORrr+ ■row al balm "s �Mw•re•a 475 CLEVELANO AVE SURE 101A 31. PAM. MN 551 W PHONE: (851))88-9018 ullPtlaspnVa9.mm 6 ENGNEERIING PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 8)r8 LAKE DRIVE SURE 110 LM LAKES. MN 5501♦ PHONE: (851) 381d210 FM. (651) 35-701 N a Qa 00 y �w ° Z Z OZ g o Z2 a 3 W IY a i Q o j ii O o W rc Oa Z w a c Z Q 2? SHEET l3 CALYX DESIGN GROUP WIDTHS MAY VARY 1'4' (MN.) SEE PLAITS FACE OF WALL OR BACK OF CURB. ULCM PER NOTES 1---- —E WEE ANO BUPIA➢FEOY THE EDGER PER NOTES TOP4IAF OF THE ROOT BOLL AND DISPOSE OF OFF-$ B WITH STARS EVERY IB' (MIN). REMOVE THE WRE BASKET DOWN TO T E SECOND HDRFONTAL WEE FROM THE BOTTOM MO DISPOSE OF IMSHED GRADE OFF -SITE. NOTE'. 7 OL ALTER FABRIC. NRNAIP CONIFER TO HAVE SHREDDED AT EDGES, OVERLAP SEAMS 4'. 8 OT�HWISE MNO MULCH TO BE O PITCH SUBGRADE TO DRAIN AWAY ley CONTACT WITH TRUNK. I FROM BUILDNG WALLS A CURBS. 0. PLACE ROOT BALL SO THAT BASAL FLARE 6 1' ABOVE SURROUNDING NOTES: SEE RAN FOR CROSS SLOPE DIRECTION. GRADE. MAINTENANCE STRIP WIDTH VARIES, SEE R.W. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMIT MULCH SNARES FOR OWNER APPROVAL. ENSURING THE TREES ME N A PLUMB POSITK)N THROUGHOUT THE WMRANTY C11TYP. ROCK MULCH DETAIL PERIOD. .O L4 NOT TO SCALE ROOT BALL TO SIT ON MOUNDED SUBGRADE, REMOVE BURLAP F O FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL c0 WOOD MULCH PER NOTES ON CENTER STAGING M STATED ON PUW w PLANTING SOL WIDTH OF HCLE EXGW, SHALL OOENOA MNNAA G8 TOPSOIL Nd1ES LEYO„O TIE RUNTS ROOTSYSTEM. / Iv SOD RERAREORANTEG soL BED P MN. FFR Nines. y Y DEPMWATERNO Nz.SN '� X. �E UBGRADE YACN PEt,pTEB TOMAHAVM TREE STABLQER STAKES. MINIMUM (2) PER TREE. FNFm� DRAIN SYSTEM IS NECESSMY FOR HEAVY CLAY SOLS. / 4' DIAMETER AUGERED HOLE, RAM ACCDRDNG iDPVMNG OETALR FIXt EQATEO R.NT)r,GLOGmN5N1Tx TxE EXCEPTION OF REpK.EO 42' MIN. DEPTH. AIN ROCK.COVE xalE WloTN. TWICE BALL DIAMETER W)6'FIDIAMETERR FABFUIC. COVER WI 6' FILTER FABRIC. r1TYP. SHRUB PLANTING - SECTION \,L4j NOTTOSCALE i1C0NIFEROUS TREE PLANTING — SECTION L4 NOT TO SCALE STNE—ESASRFErtDTOMM'FANAN aM NDR N N BENDN MEMORY CARE PATIO ENLARGEMENT: SCALE 1:10 ,REE�UYWExMx�ANN���sDRsrAN r. E°� ERw PINE b� ATM�E �Ew ONLY ARUM DEAD BR.WCHFS TIE FRSTYEAR rwz wv.�u .Twnva rwa w.c RW1TN0 wwssrr[t az.¢e owv.vEz .>r r s TExz —FE RA1G: A'DMMeTER MINIMW.6DWEIER PREFERRED. m +vEz .x�uTmrmz SIMA TNEKMMSOEOAT1ET.III Esaga EMMGEMEHT CPEN BLEIM T EEXCESS SOl IR,TR THE TOP ff THLINE FRS) MARE ROOT B NSBIE. PLAM i0*ET----R--L—F-1-1-T NURSERY tiNOE MfR01AV TEE nAlas. tlrs IXPfN )o KELP PRBveNrnne.ra. EN:YrXNO ROOTS. ROm BN1 =60URROTREeS EDF£CF Yg00 MILW. W NO RACE MIILCN N gILYI. CONTACT WITIITRFE IRU,K 4W)ANRB,GYEALL 1WNE. ROPE AID'MIE. AI9 BLRN lIE MACN WEEPFRFE FCRAFIERFROM TY TROOP ROOT BNL RUMNG. Rom ENSRYREEFFSTIUUh U,soL FROMTHETGPa N.wFaaor,wNaaa RANTNCN+FwsseEES FESENsuRETxE FRS)M..I— Roo)IsvATTw, Twn sa••ACFnLsxAU IE GARDEN MIBIDEsaFN SNBDCNeoE wFTxour lxaEwxc FlwsxFnm of =(!U- (OFCOIi0.5),SNOr80t ITERv AI, Tom. DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING - SECTION L4 NOT To SCALE ,�M„.� PERwIai RANT t 1AL MIaaI PER NOTES Ftt,E caaraN vAREs-SEE RAN. MTL NAxoaDosEn amTs aF caxrANxTb¢o TwTF MMI:TwLs. - RAxrnD SOA PIn Noreslr Mx. DErnL Y•.. , HI. _ - COxRMCTOP E3EPNiED SUBDR40E %41TYP. PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL \,L4j NOT TO SCALE a�xN.waaENz (I __TUTU=I=_=III nrowzo. wxwwn. wa ae� III— III- �� 1-111= _TUTU ry cZ: SECTK)N VIEW B REINFORCED TURF DETAIL 1-4 NOT TO SCALE MMQIr FA r F I& pILv.4Lelt below. LANDSCAPE DETAILS, NOTES, + SCHEDULES: Call betoreYOU dig. 475 CLEVELAND AVE SUITE 101A ST. PAM, MN 55104 PHONE:(851)]88-R018 UI A d n o P a S RENEGPNL AErEe a4IN NGG PLOW NC MI . 6]]8 LAKE DRIVE SUffE 110 LNOlAKES. MN 55014 PHONE: 1651)381-0210 FAX: (651)361-0]01 DRAWN BY: CHECK BV: JOB NO: IDATE: 22-2050 022924 SHEET 14 SCAPE Notes & REQUIREMENTS: 1. Tree saucer for individual trees outside of a plant bed to be four inches (4') depth Western Red Cedar wood mulch for trees outside of a plant bed. Install per tree planting detail. Do not place mulch against tree trunk. Remove wire and burlap from top third of root ball before final soil back -fill and mulch. 2. Refer to civil plan sheets for grading, drainage, site dimensions, survey, tree removal, proposed utilities & erosion control. 3. All plant material shag comply with the latest edhion of the American Standard for Nursery Stock, Amercan Association of Nurserymen. Unless noted otherwise, deciduous shrubs shall have at least 5 canes at the specified shrub height. Plant material shall be delivered as specified. AN deciduous trees are measured at 48' from finished grade to determine tree diameter (DBH). All coniferous trees are measured from finished grade to the top of the central leader. If no central leader is present on comfercus trees, that plant is rejected and must be replaced immediately. 4. Plan takes precedence over plant schedule if discrepancies in quantities exist. 5. All proposed plants shall be located and staked as shown. 6. Adjustment in location of proposed plant material may be needed in field. Should an adjustment be required, the client will provide field approval. Significant changes may require city review and approval. 7. The project landscape contractor shall be held responsible for watering and property handling all plant materials brought on the site both before and after installation. Schedule plant deliveries to coincide with expected installation time within 36 hours. 8. All plant materials shag be fertilized upon installation as specified. 9. The landscape contractor shall provide the owner with a watering schedule appropriate to the project site conditions and to plant material growth requirements. 10. N the landscape contractor is concerned or perceives any deficiencies in the plant selections, soil conditions, drainage or any other site condition that might negatively affect plant establishment, survival or guarantee, they must bring these deficiencies to the attention of the landscape architect & client prior to bid submission. Plant bed drainage concerns during plant installation shag be brought to the attention of the Owner and General Contractor immediately. 11. Contractor shall establish to his/ her satisfaction that soil and compaction conditions are adequate to allow for proper drainage at and around the building site. 12. Contractor is responsible for ongoing maintenance of all newly installed material for the duration of the plant warranty, with the exception of turf sold, which shag be maintained for 30 days after Installation or until the first mowing, whichever canes first. Contractor must bag clippings from initial mowing and remove from the job site. Any acts of vandalism or damage which may occur prior to warranty start shag be the responsibility of the contractor. Contractor shall provide the owner with O&M information, including (but not limited to), written instructions w proper lawn mowing height, yearly lawn maintenance recommendations, proper plant pruning information, plant & lawn fertilization schedule, and disease/pest control. 13. Warranty: The contractor shall guarantee newly planted material through one calendar year from the date of written owner acceptance. Plants that exhibit more than 15% die -back damage shag be replaced at no additional cost to the owner. The contract« shall also provide adequate tree wrap and deer/rodent protection measures for the plantings during the wamanly period. 14. This layout plan constitutes our understanding of the landscape requirements listed in the ordinance. Changes and modifications maybe requested by the city based on applicant information, pudic input, council decisions, etc. 15. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for obtaining any permits and coordinating inspections as required throughout the work process. 16. Plant size & species substitutions must be approved in writing prior to acceptance in the field. 17. Irrigation: The landscape contractor shag furnish an irrigation Layout Plan for head -to -head coverage of all tree, turf and shrub planting areas. Use commercia4rade irrigation equipment and provide product cat -sheets and (4) copies of the proposed layout plan to the landscape architect for review and approval prior to installation. Coordinate irrigation connection point, controller, back -flow and valviZ locations with the mechanical engineer, architect, & general contractor. Include 1 fall shutdown and spring star -up in irrigation bid. Sch 80 PVC sleeves are required to be placed under paved areas. This effort is to be coordinated between the landscape contractor, irrigation contracor, excavator, paving contractor, and General Contractor. 18. All edger shall be professional grade black steel edger, 1/8" thickness. Anchor every 18' on -center (minimum). Submit sample. 19. Landscape Contractor is responsible for coordination with the General Contractor, to protect the new improvements on and off -site during landscape work activities. Report any damage to the General Contractor immediately. 20. Unless otherwise notedfindicated, building foundation plant beds shall receive 4" depth of local granite rock mulch. Install over fabric weed mat, per detail. Submit mulch sample for Owner approval. Do no, install weed mat under perennials, with the exception of ornamental grasses. Where noted per plan, specialty planting areas to receive 4" depth of Westem Red Cedar wood mulch over fabric weed mat. per detail. Submit mulch sample for Owner approval. Do not install weed mat under perennials, with the exception of ornamental grasses. 21. All planting, seeding, and sodded areas shag be prepared prior to installation activities with a hadey power box rake or equal to provide a firth planting bed free of stones, sticks, construction debris, etc. 22. Turf Sodding activity shag conform to all miss and regulations as established in the MnDOT Seeding Manual. 2014 edition, for turf bed preparation, installation, maintenance, acceptability, and warranty. 23. The Landscape Contractor shag furnish samples of all landscape materials for approval prior to installation. 24. The Landscape Contractor shag clear and grub the underbrush from within the work limits to remove dead branches, leaves, trash, weeds and foreign materials. 25. The landscape contractor shag contact Gopher State One Call no less than 48 hours before digging for field utility locations. 26. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for the removal of erosion control measures once vegetation has been established to the satisfaction of the municipal staff. This includes sift curtain fencing and sediment logs placed in the landscape. 27. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for visiting the site to become familiar with the conditions prior to bidding and installation. Coordinate with the general contractors on matters such as fine grading, landscaped area conditions, staging areas, irrigation connection to building, etc. 28, See Site and Civil plans for additional information regarding the project, including infiltration area soils and sub -surface drainage requirements and performance. 29. The Landscape Contractor shall establish to his/ her satisfaction that the earthwork is complete, topsoil spread to w act depth, and compaction conditions are adequate to allow for proper drainage at and around the building site. Notify the General Contractor immediately O soil conditions left by the earthwork subcontractor are not satisfactory. No additional compensation will be pail for discrepancies due to earthwork once the landscape contractor begins plant material installation. 30. Topsoil Requirements: All graded areas of the site that are designated on the plan set for turf sod shall have no less than 6' of imported top soil, areas designated for shrubs, trees, and perennials shall have no less than 12" of imported top soil, meeting MnDOT classifications for planting sod for trees, shrubs, and turf. Slope away from building. 31. Landscape contractor must prove the open sub -grade of all planting areas after their excavation is capable of infiltrating a minimum requirement of 1/44nch of water per hour prior to installation of plant materiels, topsoil, irrigation, weed mat, and mulch. Planting areas not capable of meeting this requirement shag have 4' diameter X 48' depth holes augured every 36" on -center and filled with MnDOT Free -Draining Coarse Filter Aggregate. Re -test sub -grade percolation for compliance to infiltration minimum requirement. 32. Landscape contractor to provide nursery pull list (bill of lading) including plant species and sizes shipped to the site. Additionally, the landscape contractor shah provide nursery stock traceability, proving none of the materials provided contain or are genetic strains of the neonicotinoid family including acetamiprid, dothianidin, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, mthiazine, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam. 33. Modular block retaining wall layout & elevabons per civil plans. Manufacturer, block type, and color to be determined by the Architect. 34. Landscape Accent Boulders: Duluth Trap Rock Boulder, approx. 3'Lx3Wx3'H. Install where shown per plan. Submit images of boulders to Owner/Architect for approval. Quantity. 8 IRRIGATION Notes & REQUIREMENTS: 1. LAYOUT WORK AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE TO THE CONTRACTOR PROVIDED AND OWNER -APPROVED IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR MAY MAKE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LOCATION AND SPACING AS NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE ACTUAL CONDITIONS. HEAD LOCATIONS SHALL BE FLAGGED AND REVIEWED BY THE OWNER-S REP. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. COORDINATE SLEEVING AND IRRIGATION PIPE / HEAD / INTERNAL PLUMBING INSTALLATION WITH THE WORK OF OTHERS. 3. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS DETAILED ON DRAWINGS. (HOWEVER IF THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS ANDIOR SPECIFICATIONS DO NOT THOROUGHLY DESCRIBE THE METHOD OR TECHNIQUES TO BE USED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE INSTALLATION METHODS ISSUED BY THE MANUFACTURER. ALL SUCH LITERATURE MUST BE SUBMITTED 2 WEEKS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.) 4. CHECK AND VERIFY ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE CONDmONS, UTILITIES AND SERVICES PRIOR TO TRENCHING. 5. LATERAL PIPING TO BE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES DEEP AND MAINLINES A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES DEEP. 6. ALL MAN LINE PIPING AND LATERAL PIPE OF 1-1/T AND LARGER SHALL BE PVC ($DR 26 / CLASS 160). ALL OTHER LATERAL PIPE OF 1-IM' AND SMALLER MAY BE POLYETHYLENE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. BUILDING CONNECTIONS ARE TO BE COPPER. TRACER WARE IS REQUIRED ON ALL MAN AND LATERAL LINES. SLEEVE LOCATIONS ARE TO BE MARKED ON THE SIDEWALK OR CURB, SO THEY CAN BE FOUND AFTER FINE GRADING. 7. ALL TEES AND ELBOWS ON MAIN LINES SHALL BE PVC (160 PSI). 8. IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT SHALL HUNTER, RAINBIRD, OR TORO BRAND HEADS, VALVES, AND ROTORS. MATCH EXISTING EQUIPMENT BRAND ON -PROPERTY. 9. ADJUST HEADS FOR GRADE, AS NECESSARY, AFTER TURF GRASS HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AND ALL SETTLEMENT AT HEADS HAS OCCURRED. 10. SUBMIT IRRIGATION PRODUCT DATA TO OWNER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. It. USE TEFLON TAPE ON ALL THREADED JOINTS. 12. CONDUCT PERFORMANCE TEST IN THE PRESENCE OF OWNER AND ARCHITECT FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF SYSTEM INSTALLATION. 13. CONDUCT AND DEMONSTRATE WINTERIZATION AND SPRING START-UP PROCESS TO OWNER IN THE FALL OF COMPLETION. 14. IRRIGATION LINE LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE IN THE FIELD, AS CONTRACTOR DEEMS NECESSARY. is. OVER -SPRAY OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM ON TO ADJACENT WALKS AND ASPHALT PAVING IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. DO NOT INSTALL ANY IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT OUTSIDE OF THIS PROPERTY LIMITS, UNLESS APPROVED BY THE CITY. 16. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTING A COMPLETE IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN SET AND SUBMITTING TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF FIELD INSTALLATION. 17. SUBMIT LAYOUT PLAN AND PRODUCT DATA TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 18. IRRIGATION BD SHALL INCLUDE (1) FALL SHUT -DOWN AND (1) SPRING STARTUP. 19. PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS -BUILT PLAN, INCLUDING THE EXISTING SYSTEM AS WELL AS NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS. 20. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WATER PRESSURE FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING UTILITIES. ADJUSTMENT OF PPE AND VALVE SIZES MAY BE REQUIRED, BASED ON ACTUAL GPM AND PSI AVAILABLE. 21. PROVIDE A PRINTED 8.5x11 MAP OF ALL ZONES AFTER NEW CONTROLLER IS WIRED AND TESTED. 22. IRRIGATION MECHANDALS TO INCLUDE BOILER DRAIN BEFORE BACKFLOW DEVICE FOR WINTERIZATION. 23. IRRIGATION DESIGN TO INCLUDE A QUICK -COUPLE VALVE ON THE MAIN BEFORE THE FIRST VALVE FOR WINTERIZATION. 24. A WIRED RAN SENSOR IS REQUIRED AS PART OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. VERIFY LOCATION WITH ARCHITECT. 25. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO INCLUDE COST OF CITY PERMIT N IRRIGATION BID. MUNICIPAL Landscape REQUIREMENTS: Site Data: Site Perimeter (current phase only): approx. 1,930 lineal feet Building Perimeter (current phase only): approx. 3,290 lineal feet Parking Island Area (current phase only): approx. 2,400 sq ft Loading Dock Screening: 6' hgt. (at maturity) screening required from public streets & residential properties with a combination of berming, fencing, and landscaping Ground Mounted Mechanical Screening :Screening required from public streets & residential properties with landscaping or fencing Parking Areas: 6' hgt. (at maturity) screening required between parking and residential. 3' hgt. (at maturity) screening required between parking and public right-of-way with a combination of wall, fence, landscaped berth, or two staggered rows of evergreen trees. Minimum Plant Quantities (1) Site Tree (1.5" cal. or 6' hgt.) per 75 lineal feet of site perimeter 1,930 / 75 = 25 - 36 credits" = 0 Site Trees (1) Parking Island Tree (1.5" cal. or 6' hgt.) per 270 sq fit of island 2,400 / 270 = 8 Parking Island Trees (1) Site Shrub per 30 lineal feet of site perimeter 1,930 / 30 = 64 Site Shrubs (1) Foundation Shrub per 15 lineal feet of building perimeter 3,290115 = 219 Foundation Shrubs (1) Parking Island Shrub per 30 sq It of island 2,400 / 30 = 80 Parking Island Shrubs Credit for Existing Trees: Existing healthy deciduous trees greater than 4 caliper inches or existing healthy evergreen trees greater than 6 feet in height and are not identified on the City's prohibited plant species list may be credited toward the minimum required trees on site. Existing Healthy Trees to Remain as Credit (Current Phase Only)`: 36 'Refer to civil plans for tree inventory lu LANDSCAPE DETAILS, NOTES, + SCHEDULES: It. a"ii9llievez.a CALYX DESIGN GROUP 475 CLEVEI xND AVE SUITE 101A ST. PAM, MN 55104 PHONE: (651) 788-9018 cayxd.WQ,o p.can it Nn v relic GI4:E- PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 L xKE DRNE SUITE 110 LINO LAKES. MN 55014 PHONE:(651) 361-8210 FA (651)3614701 ;AVM BY: CHECK BY: JOB NO: IDATE: 224050 02/29/24 fn M a aFzo J a V O Q LU W o 0 ZLu o W Q 4 j fn o 0 z c LLJ Q a a 0 a 0 Z Q 9 SHEET 2 L5 LEGEND ❑ DENOTES EXISTING CATCH BASIN ® DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX (D DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL MANHOLE 13 DENOTES EXISTING FIBER OPTIC BOX d DENOTES EXISTING LIGHT POLE w DENOTES EXISTING POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES ® DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES EXISTING SIGN pd DENOTES EXISTING GAS VALVE DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER APRON D4 DENOTES EXISTING WATER VALVE m DENOTES EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL r DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS LINE —>— DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER —>D— DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN r — DENOTES EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE x esxx DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION -`--'�--_�- DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES PROPOSED WATER PIPE DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PIPE —— DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE ® DENOTES PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE Q DENOTES PROPOSED CATCH BASIN Q DENOTES PROPOSED FLARED -END SECTION DENOTES PROPOSED GATE VALVE DENOTES PROPOSED HYDRANT S DE NOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR 9 D. DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (GUTTERLINE, BTNMINOUS SURFACE, OR GROUND 44 0% SURFACE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED) DENOTES PROPOSED DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE — DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FENCE •— DENOTES PROPOSED TREE PROTECTION FENCE DENOTES PROPOSED BIOROLLS DENOTES MAINTENANCE ACCESS ROUTE DENOTES PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION ® DENOTES PROPOSED RIP -RAP ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD SS DATUM GENERALNOTES 1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL IS LEVEL D PER Cl I ASCE 38-02. 2. CALL *811' FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION. AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS. 4. INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES (MOST CURRENT EDITION) AND MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (MOST CURRENT EDITION). 5. STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 6. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 7. ALL STREET SIGNS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MNNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD.) 8. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY GRADING, DRAINAGE & ESC NOTES 1. PROJECT LIES WITHIN COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT (CCWD.) A CCWD PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY SITE DISTURBANCE. 2. PROJECT DISTURBS MORE THAN ONE (1) ACRE. AN NPDES PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY SITE DISTURBANCE. 3. THERE ARE NO WETLANDS ONSITE. 4. THIS SITE IS LISTED IN FLOOD ZONE 'X• PER FEMA MAPPING. 5. TREE TAGGING AND INVENTORY BY JACOBSON ENVIRONMENTAL. 6. FIELD SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY E.G. RUD AND SONS LAND SURVEYING, INC. ON 511-2022 AND 5-12-2022. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE CATCH BASIN INLET SEDIMENT PROTECTION PRIOR TO WINTER FREEZE AND REPLACE IN SPRING IF SITE STABILIZATION HAS NOT BEEN ACHIEVED. OR AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY ENGINEER. 8. DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT VEGETATION. 9. DEVELOPERICONTRACTOR SHPLL PROVIDE SITE STABILIZATION, INCLUDING ON ANY STOCKPILES, WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF GRADING COMPLETION OR INACTIVITY. 10. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE 4:1 OR FLATTER. LEGAL DESCRIPTION DEVELOPER ].A. WEDUM FOUNDATION TWO CARLSON PARKWAY STE 335 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 ]AY PORTZ 612-789-3363 ]AYPORTZ@WEDUM.ORG ENGINEER PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 ADAM GINKEL, P.E. 651-361-8234 ADAMOPLOWE.COM SURVEYOR E.G. RUD 3 SONS LAND SURVEYING, I 67761AKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 ]ASON RUD 651-361-8225 ]RUD@EGRUD.COM ARCHITECT SARAH KERN, AIA, CDT KAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS 1301 AMERICAN BLVD E STE 100 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 612-285-3891 SARAHKOKAAS W ILSON.COM PARCEL A: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south and east of County Road 18, also known as Crosstown Blvd.; except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Winslow Hills 2nd Addition and Winslow Hills 3rd Addition. and PARCEL B: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota. GRAPHIC SCALE 60 0 30 60 120 1 NCH . a0 FEET 130' x 24•J p0 o \ � C CAD%2050 SILVERCREST BASE 12.DW7 \V®/ \ �tFe-m slwL seF.1 PROVIDE INLET 1003.100 SEMMENT , 90x.xs \ 900.]0 '!. I PRE-TREATMENT CELL GRAPHIC SCALE /' / a/ v• CONTROL FOR ALL NEW STORM C /I \, \ '1 EOF RIM / =i 3:1 CONTOURS BELOW EL 6% SEWER INLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS \ \ I. ^• BOTTOM = 894 00 40 D 20 w 80 •/ • / OF STRUCTURE INSTALLATION w2.is �• \ .1 " \ I ' ' • 9w.z0 •� \ 1 NCH • QFEET 96' / • AFs / I / %' ~ ' �' 90).w ' � m � \ \ 0 l6 (a2d•) GARAGE 897.00 ��jjMl 9ox.w / t 9ox.zs SLAB ON GRADE �, / �900 f FIRST FLOOR 90825 wz.so T 9 FFE 902.9 j%�� / / > � z e9).w -_ ,,,, 9os .fi> \ \� ) • \ ' \ � Fi' � 1 �t _ v._,H, �c SLAT E902RAD - / 'p p/w zs �4 9o).w •\\ 9p .9p \\\` y � PLOWEI. •nn '_.3. -'.�. �` // ♦ __ /' �l 9R.� ' / / \ / w).x0 .w�.a '` � 90135 5 / R99.60 9w.05 \ 2 � 'fir-1 / mx.70 / \ a 900.t\\ firIfi UKE DRNE BOTTOM BASIN 2(SEE DETAIL) SURE BOTTOM 696.0 LINO LAKES. MN 5E014 GARAGE 897.00 , ..., 9oL)0 \ / 9wso e99 - NWL89r.5 w v - / mx901.t0 ' �\ 00 / 9�. T%-YRHWL 699.z PHONE'(651)%1dz10 r.+ ` / . i/ n7oo 8 • wx zs / FIRST FLOOR 90825 ^ \ / E f \ \\� \ FAX. (651) U14701 INF. BASIN 4(SEE DETAIL) \ /vt • wz.ls w w Y wAO «+ ' mtmo.7fi 'm / o mp \ Z BOTTOM 897.0 DRAWN BY: CHECK BV: NWL 898.0 / / .• / wz. mt ,` Nx.)0_ 900 85 \ /900.50 +� \ \♦\\ ` \ \ AG MOE tOD-YR HWL 899.E NO: DATE: CL)X(� PRE-TREATMENT CELL / / /// -9p0 B 9az.t5 •I'+ '+ // `` \ i '/ \- \ ZZ.zOFq 1z/1123 ]:1 CONTOURS BELOW EL 6% j / / ( wt.)5 wt x / / \ , �•� . \ 1 \ BOTTOM • 694.% Lm _ •\ \ \ SLAB ON GRADE- / _ OFFE ¢ • /y //i ILl O 9m ep� / 9os.w N (SEE DETAIL) 0 � � ....> /fie / ee)s 9M1- _ -.r•e - t - «� - - \\ woes � ..) SLAB ON GRADE ' ( � ,• � EOFto / � -_ � �{ a `l f ..f'.' a°' e \ / yogi • - - FFE 902. m 0 I / `� r // - t `.\ • \\ LLl- /!1 s // � ,/ •••,s BE5 90R.)0 9a6.15 9M.90 901.10 \ / \ - ` � �. . -20 \.«•a«�. yp Q� BID e98 899 `` `ti• s� .I I •I I `♦ 1 I ♦ 899.w „ ♦♦`. ``a ' .« w6.da w).50 906.50 B31 ' 9ad) \\ �- 90d.w _ 901 901 901 901 � -�' •``�`�\ 4' EOE op a $ m• t .«an + w5.w \ /\ NCL �+ ' B 9W 906 GARAGE 897.00 FIRST FLOOR 909.Do EDE RIM -"' - LOW AREA 4 a ••«• _ = ,906.2a m 7o wT 1%-YRHWL897,0 + � \ 000 m ♦j wd"1 :«n ALL WALLS WITH 3 OF EXPOSED FACE MUST' ' \/ ` F`)c - w g E BE DESIGNED BY A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ' / tl, ` _ / i 0 _ _ m7.m .I II} AND PROVIDED WffH A FENCE (SPLIT RAIL OR w t1t♦'�� ♦_ - ^ _ `•FiR I OTHER( INSTALLED ALONG THE TOP. ' / ,` AREA '! sa9.00 r) i♦ ♦ \ NousEG t .L '-------v. cp , I Yt `�n)` �• �ar,` \ / � ma ci'I%1 JI,mp EXCE PI`ION 902 w +s 901 R e9s.m I _ 1 ,` `` \ 1 1 � � l l l l\ I `` I I ♦1 tl I I I L -1 I � 0ET"RI 11. I _ F.:' EOF RIM eOT• / `• i .«,. I i II 1 1 � „F.' / \ _ � _ ♦ � � � w Z 't68!YA HwLfN •�yM1 // PROVIDE TWO ROWS e98 ' O .«,• \` /J i'1 i tt\4�2 Z 1 p0 // OF SLT FENCE ANDIOR e97.80 t , u L 8 )ROLLS AROUND FILTRATION BASIN / P Z Z 908 �(ISTING I I c st Da u j z M WSE Z. \ 11 I -- -----------------J �`� � - \ Lu L - - - - - - - - - - Q " RIP WI GEOTEXTL FILTER f7) E .n I 9pi' ' ``� -- \ w5.w FABRIC I 7 d `r(' LU oj 905.00 ___' I I ,'II/ I'I\I .� I _'. i'I •r r`�__ H41 I'- L- • I - I I I U O _% Z. Ex,mNc I EXCEPRtON'I I I'�rl' _�� /°DG� I Z w W a got so'� r HOUSE I `♦,` O z A Z �J� q $ E%1571NG EXISTING `�-- EXISTING `�i " uL Z � Q 3 ,' e t I ' HWSE I .HOUSE I HOUSE EOim •.R I II I W O 0 0 L --_ �? za r= 150TW LANE NW 31 (PUBLIC ROAD) _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ SHEET SEE SHEET C2.1 FOR LEGEND AND NOTES C2. ;:_VERCREST BASE ,2.DWG T = TOP OF WALL B = BASE OF WALL AT GROUND /- •\ / / I I I� \ IB RETAINING WALL - TOP AND BOTTOM SCALE = 1:30 - THESE DETAILS ONLY i I _`I ♦ . ROCK CONSTRUCTION I` ENTRANCE j / GRAPHIC SCALE V / ao o zo /o so O/ / 1 NCH = 90 FEET / (-X 24•) / / ' ':.'. • • 903.00 90Z.50 9p1.B0 •w+ I � .. � .:' •♦F .� •. .' >b 90 9a SLAB ON GRADE FFE 903.0 ALL WALLS WITH 3FF OF EXPOSED FACE MUST ' +': !: •':: • / ' \ \ BE DESIGNED BY A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER / VVV%• �,: '••••• ,/ I '1°^' s4 AND PROVIDED WITH A FENCE (SPLIT RAIL OR d,:/ ••�' /. \ .�.1 �' qo0 6 OTHER)INSTALLED ALONG THE TOP. - %: :•'•'• / -_ \ .�, 1 eA / � � •.'.'c 9°°.°' •. �ib �o� i 9oz.00 / F � eonai e 1 esEE IoErrLl I / _ !i .•'909.99 • :0z II \ \ "`1oo-ra'HwL goo I LATCHING REPRESENTS AREAS TO BEDIMENT KEPT CLEAR OF TREES AND OTHER /•• CONTROL FOR ALLNEW STORM C\ 35♦ \\ EOF RIM SEWER INLETWIHM 24 HOURS VISUAL OBSTRUCTIONS OVER 2-FEET /; = ; ':' ;:;: ` ,/ OF STRUCTURE INSTALLATION IN HEIGHT (STREET SIGNS EXEMPT) j�f, �` // ,,' 1 (TYR) �•: k �` / ;!ll / qPb GARAGE 897.00 I \ Z. / � mZ.ss SLAB ON GRADE \\ E d.. yba •. / �• FIRST FLOOR 908.28 / `•b EOF / \ ®� INF. BASIN I (SEE DETAIL) 4 PRE-TIiJEATMENT CELL Co ... , I• i� I/ 1 61ENGNEERNG \ PLOWE r ENGINEERING. INC. \ M. LA1fE DRIVE SUITE 110 IGLASS 3 RIPRAP WI MNDOT TYPE { GEOTEXTILE 1 FABRIC (SEE DETAIL{? IS FOR QUANTITIES) . TYP PRE-TREATMENT CELL 3:1 CONTOURS BELOW EL ON IBOTTOM = ON." m.. v I II I II I I_ I PROVIDE TWO ROWS OF SILT FENCED D/OINFILTRATION RATIBIORO LS AROUND INFILTRATION BASINS lT'/PI B IIPRE-TREATMENT CELL CONTMRS BELOW EL ON BonoM - es{.00 I I C - '--r !O R 1 sue\ \ y 11+^1 \ I 899.60 900 U r INF. BASIN 2 (SEE DETAIL) + NWL MEUF `\ 100-YRH WL 999.2 \ SLAB ON GRADE__ FFE 901.20 \ `re \ SHEET C2.1 FOR LEGEND AND NOTES PROJECT NAME ANDOVER SENIOR CAMPUS PROJECT LOCATION NO ASSIGNED ADDRESS" SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CROSSTOWN BLVO NW AND HANSON BLVD NW MOOVER, MINNESOTA, 55304 AND" COUNTY PID: 23-2-2433-0002 23-32-2"-0806 LATITUDE: 45244678 LONGITUDE:-93.303959 DEVELOPER 3.A. WEDUM FOUNDATION TWO CARLSON PARKWAY STE 335 PLYMOUTH, MN 55.7 CONTACT NAME: JAY PORTZ CONTACT PHONE: 612-789-3363 OFFICE CONTACT E-MAIL: )AYPORTZ®WEDUM.ORG GENERALCONTRACTOR TBD A INDMDUAL WHO PREPARED THE SWPPP: ADAM GINKEL PLOWS ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES MN 5Wl4 (651)361-8234 edam@pbwe.cam B. INDIVIDUAL(S) OVERSEENG IMPLEMENTATION OF, REVISING MDIOR AMENDING THE SWPPP AND INDIVIDUALS PERFORMING INSPECTIONS FOR THE PROJECT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUALS MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY THE MPCA. IMNN. R. 7090j CONTACT NAME CONTACT PHONE CONTACT EWAL: C. INDIVIDUAL(S) PERFORMNG OR SUPERVISING THE NSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF BMPS. PAWN. R. 70901 CONTACT NAME CONTACT PHONE CONTACT E-MAIL: THE PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FEATURES FOR THIS SITE INCLUDES MULTIPLE INFILTRATION BASINS - THESE WILL BE OPERATED AND MAINTAINED PRIVATELY. SE 'STORMWATER DRAINAGE REPORT' FOR INFORMATION AND NARRATIVE OF REVEGETATION SPECIFICATIONS PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. SITE IMPERVIOUS AREAS BEFORE AFTER CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION TOTAL SITE AREA 15D4i ACRES TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPERVIOUS OACRES 8.61 ACRES TOTAL ESTIMATED PERVIOUS 15DM ACRES 8.40 ACRES TOTAL DISTURBED AREA -13.7ACRES SITE MAP W/ EXISTING AND FINAL GRADES AND DESIGN CALCULATIONS SEE'STORNWATER DRAINAGE REPORT' FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED AREA MAPS. DENOTING DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARIES. DIRECTIONS OF FLOW, AND DISCHARGE POINTS WHERE STORMWATER LEAVES THE SITE. RECEIVING WATERS WITHIN ONE MILE NAME OF WATER BODY TYPE OF WATER BODY SPECIAL WATER IMPAIRED WATER COONCREEK DITCH NO YES BUFFER TO SURFACE WATER ❑ ❑ X IF THE SITE SURADEWINSTOA SURFACE ATER WATER, IS 50-FT NATURAL BUFFER ADJACENT TO YES NO WA NOTE: NATURAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED ADJACENT TO ROAD DITCHES, JUDICIAL DITCHES, COUNTY DITCHES, STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS, STORM DRAIN INLETS, AND SEOI MINT BASINS. A) THEREARENOWETIANDSOR SURFACES WATFRS MTNINSOFEETOF PRO_T DUTURMNCE LIMITS. TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION WINS ES ❑ ❑ IFTEN (10)ORMOREACRES OF DISTURBED SOIL O LOCATION,ISATEMPORARYSEDMENT BASIN PROVIDED FOR TREATMENT OF VIES NO WA THERUNOFFBEFORE IT LEAVES THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR ENTERS SURFACE WATERS? A) MECONI MRWILLPROWMMMPORARYSEOLMENTATiONSASINSIFIO ORMOREACRESOFDISTURBEDSOILDRAINTOACOMMONLD MN. INFILTRATION FEASIBILITY ❑ 6 ARE THERE MY INFILTRATION RESTRICTIONS FOR THE SITE (SEE 15.14 YES NO WA THROUGH 1621? A) TIIESREIMSILSG ASOILSANDAWATFRTABLEELEVATIONTHATALUD S FOR /AIFlLTRATpN. ❑ O ARE THERE MY STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES PER: YES NO ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW DOCUMENT? • ENDANGERED SPECIES REVIEW? • ARCHAEOLOGICALREVIEW? • OTHER LOCK. STATE OR FEDERAL REVEW7 IF YES TO ANY OF THE ABOVE, DESCRIBE THE MITIGATION MEASURES. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS PERMIT, MITIGATION MEASURES MEANS ACTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID, MINIMIZE, OR MITIGATE FOR IMPACTS RELATED TO EROSION PREVENTKN, SEDIMENT CONTROL, THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM, POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES AND DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION ACTMTY. [MINN. R. 7090] REM MOOT SPECIFICATIONANOTES SOD M78 SEED M76 ' FOR TURF ESTABLISHMENT COMMERCIAL TURF MNDOT MD(2513/(220 LBS/ACRE) RESIDENTIAL TURF MNDOT MIX 25-131(120 LBSIACRE) TEMPORARY FALL COVER MNDOT MIX 21-112 (IN LBS/ACRE) SPR94WUMMER MNDOT MIX 21-111(IN LBS/ACRE) SOLRUILDNG COVER MNDOT MIX21-113(110 LE&ACRE) 1-2 YEARS COVER MNDOT MIX 22-111 (W.5 LBS/ACW) 25 YEARS COVER MNDOT MIX 1112111) MULCOH 3882 (TYPE 1 -DISC ANCHORED) HVDRMULCH 38M FERTILIZER 3881 WOOD FIBER BIJWKET 388S (CATEGORY 2) MOWAMNMUMOF: RESIDENTIAL TURF - OMCE PER 2 WEEKS COMMERCIAL TURF -ONCE PER 4 WEEKS " SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE EITHER MULCHED OR COVERED BY FIBROUS BLANKETS TO PROTECT SEEDS AND LIMIT EROSION, OUMTITIES - ESTIMATED QUANTITIES FOR EROSION MD SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SILT FENCE LNEAR FEET BIOROLLS EACH RIPRAP W. GEO-0ABRq CUBIC YARDS CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION EACH STABILIZED (SODDED) OVERFLOW EACH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SQUARE YARDS SEED L MULCH (GENERAL) ACRE ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 1. A COPY OF THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN MD SWPPP MUST BE AVAILABLE ON THE PROJECT SITE AT ALL TIMES. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON PLAN. 2.1. ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE MAY BE NECESSARY IF LOCAL CONDITIONS REQUIRE. 22. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN SILT FENCE, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT, THROUGH COMPLETION OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. 2.3. SILT FENCE SHALL REMAIN N-0LACE UNTIL SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC WILL ENTER/EXIT SITE. 4. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING (IF APPLICABLE). 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM SITE GRADING ON AN AREA-BYAREA BASIS TO MINIMIZE UNSTABLRED AREAS. 5.1. STRP MD STOCKPILE TOPSOL NECESSARY FOR USE N RESTORATIONS. ALL STOCKPLES MUST BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY WITH TEMPORARY SEEDING AND MULCHNG F NOT ACTIVELY WORKING WITH THE MATERIAL 5.2. CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY NITIATE STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED SOIL AREAS. AS DESCRIBED N DEM BA OF THE PERMIT, MD COMPLETE THE STABILIZATION WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY N THAT PORTION OF THE SITE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES. 5.3. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14.1 THROUGH 14.10. 6. CONTRACTOR TO SHALL PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES TO ENSURE THE EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES NPLACE N THOSE AREAS PREVENT MIGRATION OF SEDIMENT ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 7. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR IMPLEMENTED IN THE FIELD SHALL M N ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY MO NPDES PHASE II PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. B. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SLT FENCE. BIOROLLS, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, OR OTHER APPROVED EQUAL FOR MY SLOPES THAT APPEAR TO BE FAILING 9. CONTRACTOR TO STABILIff SOL STOCKPILES; STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL FINAL GRADE MALE AREAS UPON STABILIZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS. NPDES DEFINITIONS 'REST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPSY MEANS THE MOST EFFECTIVE AND PRACTICABLE MEANS OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL, AND WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES THAT ARE THE MOST EFFECTIVE AND PRACTICABLE MEANS OF TO CONTROL, PREVENT, AND MINIMIZE DEGRADATION OF SURFACE WATER, INCLUDING AVOIDANCE OF IMPACTS, CONSTRUCTION?HASNG, MINIMIZING THE LENGTH OF TIME SOIL AREAS ARE EXPOSED, PROHIBITIONS. POLLUTION PREVENTION THROUGH GOOD HOUSEKEEPING, AND OTHER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PUBLISHED BY STATE OR DESIGNATED AREA -WIDE PLANNNG AGENCIES. [MNN, R. 7090] 'CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY' MEANS ACTNITIES INCLUDING CLEARING, GRADING. AND EXCAVATNG, THAT RESULT N LAND DISTURBANCE OF EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN ONE ACRE. NCLUDNG THE DISTURBANCE OF LESS THAN ONE ACRE OF TOTAL LAND AREA THAT IS PART OF A LARGER COMMON PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT OR SALE IF THE LARGER COMMON PLAN WILL ULTIMATELY DISTURB EOUAL TO OR GREATER THAN ONE ACRE. THIS INCLUDES A DISTURBANCE TO THE LAND THAT RESULTS IN A CHANGE IN THE TOPOGRAPHY, EXISTING SOL COVER. BOTH VEGETATIVE AND NONVEGETATNE, OR THE EXISTING SOIL TOPOGRAPHY THAT MAY RESULT N ACCELERATED STORMWATER RUNOFF THAT MAY LEAD TO SOIL EROSION AND MOVEMENT OF SEDIMENT. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY DOES NOT INCLUDE A DISTURBANCE TO THE LAND OF LEW THAN ENE ACRES FOR THE PURPOSE OF ROUTINE MAINTENANCE PERFORMED TO MAINTAIN THE ORIGINAL LINE AND GRADE, HYDRAULIC CAPACITY, AND ORIGINAL PURPOSE OF THE FACILITY. ROUTINE MAINTENANCE DOES NOT INCLUDE ACTIVITIES SUCH AS REPAIRS, REPLACEMENT AND OTHER TYPES OF NON -ROUTINE MAINTENANCE. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION THAT DOES NOT DISTURB THE UNDERLYING SOILS (E.G., MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECTS) IS NOT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. [MINN. R. 7090] MEWATERING' MEANS THE REMOVAL OF SURFACE OR GROUND WATER TO DRY AND/OR SOLIDIFY A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO ENABLE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. DEWATERING MAY REQUIRE A MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WATER APPROPRIATION PERMIT AND, IF DEWATERING WATER IS CONTAMINATED, DISCHARGE OF SUCH WATER MAY REQUIRE AN INDIVIDUAL MPCA NPDESSDS PERMIT. [MINN. R 7090I 'EROSION PREVENTION' MEANS MEASURES EMPLOYED TO PREVENT EROSION SUCH AS SOL STAB LQATION PRACTICES PERMMENT COVER OR CONSTRUCTION PHASING. MINN. R. 709DI 'GENERAL CONTRACTOR' MEANS THE PARTY WHO SIGNS THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH THE OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE ENTIRE PROJECT DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL PLANS AND SPEC IFICATONS. WHERE THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT INVOLVES MORE THAN ONE CONTRACTOR, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGING THE ENTIRE PROJECT ON BEHALF OF THE OWNER. IN SOME CASES, THE OWNER IS THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. IN THESE CASES, THE OWNER SIGNS THE PERMIT APPLICATION AS THE OPERATOR AND BECOMES THE SOLE PERMITME. [MINN. R. 70901 'GROUNDWATER' MEANS THE WATER CONTAINED BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH IN THE SATURATED ZONE INCLUDING, WITHOUT LMfTATION, ALL WATERS WHETHER UNDER CONFNED, UNCONFNED. OR PERCHED CONDITIONS. IN NEAR SURFACE UNCONSOLIDATED SEDIMENT OR REGOLITH, OR N ROCK FORMATIONS DEEPER UNDERGROUND. [MINN. R. 7060] 'HOMEOWNER FACT SHEET MEANS AN MPCA FACT SHEET AVALABL E ON THE MPCA CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER WESSITE FOR PERMITTEES TO GIVE TO HOMEOWNERS AT THE TIME OF SALE. IMINN. R. 709D) 'INFEASBLE' MEANS NOT TECHNOLOGICALLY POSSIBLE OR NOT ECONOMICALLY PRACTICABLE AND ACHIEVABLE N LIGHT OF THE BEST INDUSTRY PRACTICES [MINN. R. 70%] 'INIT WTED IMMEDIATELY MEANS TMNG M ACTION TO COMFAENCE $OIL STABILIZATION AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE, BUT NO LATER THAN THE END OF THE WORK DAY, FOLLOWING THE DAY WHEN THE LANDDISTURBING ACTIVITIES TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASE, IF THE PERMITTEES KNOW THAT CONSTRUCTION WORK ON THAT PORTION OF THE SITE W ILL BE TEMPORMLV CEASED FOR 14 OR MORE ADDITIONAL CALENDAR DAYS OR 7 CALENDARDAYS WHERE REM 23.9APPLES. PERMFTEES CM INMATE STABILIZATION BY: A PREPPING THE SOL FOR VEGETATIVE OR NON -VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION, OR B. APPLYING MULCH OR OTHER NON-VEGETATNE PRODUCT TO THE EXPOSED SOIL AREA: OR C. SEEDING OR PLANTING THE EXPOSED AREA OR D. STARTING ANY OF THE ACTIVITIES N A -C ON A PORTION OF THE AREA TO BE $TABLIZEO, BUT NOT ON THE ENTIRE AREA. OR E. FNALQNG ARRANGEMENTS TO HAVE STABILIZATION PRODUCT FULLY INSTALLED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE DEADLINE FOR COMPLETING STABILIZATION. [MINN . R. 70901 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE' MEANS A CONSTRUCTED HARD SURFACE THAT EITHER PREVENTS OR RETARDS THE ENTRY OF WATER MO THE SOL AND CAUSES WATER TO RUN OFF THE SURFACE IN GREATER QUANTITIES AND ATM INCREASED RATE OF FLOW THAN PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT. EXAMPLES INCLUDE ROOFTOPS, SIDEWALKS. DRIVEWAYS, PARKING LOTS. MO CONCRETE, ASPHALT, OR GRAVEL ROADS. BRIDGES OVER SURFACE WATERS ARE CONSIDERED IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. [MINN. R. 7(INJ NATIONAL POLLUTMT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDESY MEANS THE PROGRAM FOR ISSUING, MODIFYING, REVOKING, REISSUING, TERMINATING, MONITORING, MD ENFMCING PERMITS UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT, AS AMENDED (33 U.S.C. 1251 ET SEC. SECTION 1342 MD 40 CFR PARTS 122. 123, 124 MD 450). [MINN. R. 7090] NATURAL BUFFER' MEANS AN AREA OF UNDISTURBED COVER SURROUNDING SURFACE WATERS WITHIN WHICH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE RESTRICTED. NATURAL BUFFER INCLUDES THE VEGETATION. EXPOSED ROCK, OR BARREN GROUND THAT EXISTS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF EARTH -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. [MINN. R. 7D901 NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT)' MEANS THE FORM (ELECTRONIC OR PAPER) REQUIRED FOR TERMINATING COVERAGE UNDER THE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT. [MINN. R. 70901 Im —KI Streams: Coon Craak Arse- U 't 0701020F530 App d TMDL PI f B-ft.anvMebretes Laassesurents; p A,W A cIE.cd) PAdR 11 imrant Fish b ssassmMmts New Imps mrents: Fish Soassessmenls Special waters and impaired waters The MS4 General Pemul M MS4' near specialy-protected waters require additional contra', rorMidon' or -.—I permit MS4s that diuh,W near Waters with qualities mat wamam ex1r4 protec ('petal waters) must use additional best management practices arM enM1ancetl runoff oontrN' (see -d Part 23.1). -OPERATOR' MEANS THE PERSON (USUALLY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR), FIRM, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, OR OTHER ENTRY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER WHO HAS DAY TO DAY OPERATIONAL CONTROL AND/OR THE ABILITY TO MODIFY PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RELATED TO THE SWPPP. THE PERMIT APPLICATION MUST LIST THE OPERATOR AS A PERMITTEE. SUBCONTRACTORS HIRED BY AND UNDER SUPERVISION OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR ARE NOT OPERATORS, [MINN. R. 7090] 'OWNER' MEANS THE PERSON, FIRM. GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY. OR OTHER ENTITY POSSESSING THE TITLE OF THE LAND ON WHICH THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WILL OCCUR OR. IF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS FOR A LEASE, EASEMENT, OR MINERAL RIGHTS LICENSE HOLDER, THE PARTY OR INDIVIDUAL IDENTIFIED AS THE LEASE, EASEMENT OR MINERAL RIGHTS LICENSE HOLDER OR THE CONTRACTING GOVERNMENT AGENCY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. (MINN. R. 70%) 'PERMANENT COVER' MEANS SURFACE TYPES THAT WILL PREVENT SOIL FAILURE UNDER EROSIVE CONDITIONS. EXAMPLES INCLUDE GRAVEL, CONCRETE, PERENNIAL COVER, OR OTHER LANDSCAPED MATERIAL THAT WILL PERMANENTLY ARREST SOIL EROSION. PERMITTEES MUST ESTABLISH A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER (I.E., EVENLY DISTRIBUTED. WITHOUT LARGE BARE AREAS) WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OF THE NATIVE BACKGROUND VEGETATIVE COVER ON ALL AREAS NOT COVERED BY PERMANENT STRUCTURES, OR EQUIVALENT PERMANENT STABILIZATION MEASURES. PERMANENT COVER DOES NOT NCLUDE TEMPORARY BMPS SUCH AS WOOD FIBER BLANKET, MULCH, AND ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS. [MINN. R. TOW) `PERMRTEES' MEANS THE PERSONS, FIRM, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, M OTHER ENTITY IDENTIFIED AS THE OWNER AND OPERATOR ON THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA AND ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. [MINN. R. 7090] TROJECT(S)' MEANS ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY PLANNED AND/OR CONDUCTED UNDER A PARTICULAR PERMIT. THE PROJECT OCCURS ON THE SITE OR SITES DESCRIBED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION, THE SWPPP AND IN THE ASSOCIATED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. [MINN. R. TONI YUBLO WATERS' MEANS ALL WATER BASINS AND WATERCOURSES DESCRIBED IN MINN. STAT. SECT. 103G.W5 SUBP. 15. [MINN. R. 70901 'SEDIMENT CONTROL' MEANS METHODS EMPLOYED TO PREVENT SUSPENDED SEDIMENT N STORMWATER FROM LEAVING THE SITE (E.G. SILT FENCES, COMPOST LOGS AND STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION). ]MINN. R. 7090I 'STMILIZE'.'STABLQED'.'STABILIZATION' MEANS THE EXPOSED GROUND SURFACE HAS BEEN COVERED BY APPROPRIATE MATERIALS SUCH AS MULCH, STAKED SOD, RIPRAP, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, MATS OR OTHER MATERIAL THAT PREVENTS EROSION FROM OCCURRING. GRASS SEEDING. AGRICULTURAL CROP SEEDING OR OTHER SEEDING ALONE IS NOT STABILIZATON. MULCH MATERIALS MUST ACHIEVE APPROXIMATELY 90 PERCENT GROUND COVERAGE (TYPICALLY 2 TOWACRE). [MINN. R 7090I 'STORMWATER' MEANS PRECIPITATION RUNOFF, STORMWATER RUNOFF, SNO—ELT RUNOFF, AND ANY OTHER SURFACE RUNOFF AND DRAINAGE. [MINN. R 7090] 'STEEP SLOPES' MEANS SLOPES THAT ARE 1.3 (VAJ (33.3 PERCENT) OR STEEPER IN GRADE. [MINN. R. 709M 'STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)' MEANS A PLAN FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGE THAT NCLUDES ALL REWIRED CONTENT UNDER IN SECTION 5 THAT DESCRIBES THE EROSION PREVENTION, SEDIMENT CONTROL AND WASTE CONTROL BMPS AND PERMANENTSTORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS. [MINN. R. 7090] SURFACE WATER OR WATERS' MEANS ALL STREAMS, WILES, PONDS, MARSHES. WETLANDS, RESERVOIRS, SPRINGS. RIVERS. DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, WATERWAYS, WATERCOURSES, AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS WHETHER NATURAL OR ARTIFICIAL, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, EXCEPT THAT SURFACE WATERS DO NOT INCLUDE STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTED FROM UPLAND. THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONSIDER STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTED N WETLANDS AND MITIGATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 22 AS SURFACE WATERS. [MINN. R 7090] 'WATERS OF THE STATE' (AS DEFINED IN MINN. STAT. SECT. 115.01, SUSP. 22) MEANS ALL STREAMS, LAKES, PLAIDS, MARSHES ,WATERCOURSES. WATERWAYS, WELLS. SPRINGS, RESERVOIRS. AQUIFERS, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND ALL OTHER BODES OR ACCUMULATIONS OF WATER, SURFACE OR UNDERGROUND. NATURAL OR ARTIFICIAL, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, WHICH ARE CONTAINED WITHIN, FLOW THROUGH, OR BORDER UPON THE STATE OR ANY PORTION THEREOF. [MINN. STAT. 115,01. SUBP. 221 'NATER QUALITY VOLUME' MEANS ONE (1) INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE NET INCREASE N IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT (CALCULATED AS M INSTMTMEOUS VOLUME). [MINN. R. 70901 'WETLANDS- (AS DEFINED N MINN. R. 7M).0106, SUBP. tABJ MEANS THOSE AREAS THAT ARE NUNDAMD OR SATURATED BY SURFACE WATER OR GROUNDWATER AT A FREQUENCY MD DURATION SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT, AND UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES DO SUPPORT, A PREVALENCE OF VEGETATION TYPICALLY ADAPTED FOR LIFE N SATURATED SOL CONDTKNS. WETLMDS GENERALLY INCLUDE SWAMPS, MARSHES, BOGS, MD SIMILAR AREAS. CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS DESIGNED FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENTARE NOT WATERS OF THE STATE. WETLANDS MUST HAVE THE FOLLOWING ATTRIBUTES. 1. A PREDOMINANCE OF HYDRO SOILS: MD 2. NUNDATED OR SATURATED BY SURFACE WATER OR GROUNDWATER AT A FREQUENCY MD DURATION SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT A PREVALENCE OF HYDROPHYTO VEGETATION TYPICALLY ADAPTED FOR LIFE IN A SATURATED SOL CONDffgN: AND 3. UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES SUPPORT PREVALENCE OF SUCH VEGETATION. [MINN. R. 7050.0186, SUBP. tABI MAP OF SURFACE WATERS A I t_7 / THERE ARE NO SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATERS WITHIN ONE (1) MILE. 00.5E 12.DWG 22-2050 LEGEND ❑ DENOTES EXISTING CATCH BASIN 0 DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX 0 DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL MANHOLE 13 DENOTES EXISTING FIBER OPTIC BOX d DENOTES EXISTING LIGHT POLE •Oz DENOTES EXISTING POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES ® DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES EXISTING SIGN DENOTES EXISTING GAS VALVE E DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER APRON Dd DENOTES EXISTING WATER VALVE m DENOTES EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL —e— DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE �z— DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS LINE �— DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER >�— DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER I— DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN r — DENOTES EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE z zzzx DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES PROPOSED WATER PIPE DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PIPE —� DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE ® DENOTES PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED CATCH BASIN Q DENOTES PROPOSED FLARED -END SECTION Z DENOTES PROPOSED GATE VALVE DE NOTES PROPOSED HYDRANT 5 DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR 920.60 DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (GUTn RUNE, BITUMINOUS SURFACE, OR GROUND 4.016 SURFAOE UNLESS OTHERWISE IND—D) DENOTES PROPOSED DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FENCE •— DENOTES PROPOSED TREE PROTECTION FENCE DENOTES PROPOSED BIOROLLS L T — — 1 DENOTES MAINTENANCE ACCESS ROUTE 0 DENOTES PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION ® DENOTES PROPOSED RIP -RAP ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD 88 DATUM GENERALNOTES 1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL IS LEVEL D PER CI I ASCE 38-02. 2. CALL'811' FOR EXISTING UTLRES LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS. 4. INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES (MOST CURRENT EDITKJN) AND MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (MOST CURRENT EDITION). S. STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 6. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 7. ALL STREET SIGNS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MNNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCDJ 8. ALL ELECTRIC. TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTKKJS SMALL BE COORDINATED WRH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS. WATERMAIN NOTES 1. PROPOSED WATERMAIN PPE SHALL BE: 1.1. MAN: DIP CLASS 52 1.2. SERVICES TO TOWN HOMES: COPPER TYPE K. 2. PROPOSED WATERMAN FITTINGS SHALL BE MECHANICAL JOINT DIP MEGALUGS. 3. FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING WATERMAIN AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. 4. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 8.0 FEET OF COVER OVER ALL WATERMAIN PIPE. S. PLACE HYDRANTS AT S-FT OFF BACK OF CURB. 6. PROVIDE PREFORMED INSULATION, PPG FOAMGLASS, OR APPROVED EQUAL WHERE SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER CROSSES WITHIN THREE (3) FEET OF WATERMAIN. 7. WATERMAJ SHUTOFF REQUIRES AMIN. 48 HOUR NOTICE TO PUBLIC WORKS AND ALL AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS. 8. CITY REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT DURING TESTING. SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1. PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PIPE MATERIAL SHALL BE: 1.1. MAIN: PVC SDR 35 12. TOWN HOMES: 4' PVC SCHEDULE 40 1.3. FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION AND LOCATION OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. 2. CONTRACT OR TO CONTACT CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONNECTION TO EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER 3. CITY REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT DURING SANITARY SEWER TESTING. 4. INFISHIELD OR APPROVED EQUAL REQUIRED. DEVELOPER J.A. WEDUM FOUNDATION TWO CARLSON PARKWAY STE 335 PLYMOUfH, MN 55447 JAY PORTZ 612-789-3363 JAYPORTZ.WEDUM.ORG SURVEYORI E.GE.G. RUND SURVEYING, INC. 6776 TAKE DRIVE LINO LAKE MN 14 JASON RUD 651-361-82 5 ENGINEER ARCHITECT PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE SARAH KERN, AN, CDT KAVS WILSQN ARCHITECTS LINO LAKES, MN 55014 1301 AMERI N VD E STE 100 ADAM GINKEL, P.E. BLOOMINGTON, Mr 55425 651-361-8234 612-285-3891 ADAM@PLOWE.COM SARAHK.KrWIISON.COM LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest , Section 21, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south and jalart ast of County Road 18, also known as Crosstown Blvd.; except that part platted as Winslow dills, Winslow Hills 3rd Addition. I Tinslow Hills 2nd Addition and and PARCEL B: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, that part platted as Winslow Hills, Anoka County, L CONNECT TO EXISTING 8' DIP — WATERMAIN STUB WITH 8' GATE VALVE (EXISTNG WAI. STUB SRE NOT VERIFIED) GRAPHIC SCALE 60 0 30 60 120 1 NGH = 80 FEET (W.24') CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY 8' PVC SEWER STUB W1 MANHOLE (EX E-891.8) SAN MH 1 RE 900.45 E 891.80 CUT INTO EXISTING 8' DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAN STUB WI DEG. BEND 8 8' GATE VALVE (AREP CE ND CURB) DISTURBED STREET EXCEPTION \ Y f i 22-2050 LEGEND ❑ DENOTES EXISTING CATCH BASIN ® DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX m DENOTES EXISTING ELECTRICAL MANHOLE D DENOTES EXISTING FIBER OPTIC BOX Q DENOTES EXISTING LIGHT POLE 'O. DENOTES EXISTING POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES ® DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE T DENOTES EXISTING SIGN DENOTES EXISTING GAS VALVE DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER APRON M DENOTES EXISTING WATER VALVE M DENOTES EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL -E- DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE DENOTES EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS LINE DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER >� DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN r L- J DENOTES EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE r } DENOTES EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE x DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS -�� DENOTES PROPOSED WATER PIPE DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PIPE ��- DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE ® DE NOTES PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE Q DENOTES PROPOSED CATCH BASIN 0 DENOTES PROPOSED FLARED -END SECTION DENOTES PROPOSED GATE VALVE DENOTES PROPOSED HYDRANT S DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR l( 920.60 DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (WTTERLINE, B TJMINOUS SURFACE, OR GRWND OX SURFACE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED) DENOTES PROPOSED DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FENCE �- DENOTES PROPOSED TREE PROTECTION FENCE DENOTES PROPOSED BIOROLLS r . DENOTES MAINTENANCE ACCESS ROUTE DENOTES PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION ® DENOTES PROPOSED RIP -RAP ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD 88 DATUM GENERAL NOTES 1. THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES 6 NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL IS LEVEL D PER Cl / ASCE 38-02. 2. CALL'811' FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS 4. INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES (MOST CURRENT EDITION) AND MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (MOST CURRENT EDITION). 5. STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 6. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 7. ALL STREET SIGNS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MNNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCO.) 8. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. INF. BASIN 4 (SEE DETAIL) \ z BOTTOM 697.0 NWL 898.0 100-YR HWL 899.6 \/ C) �\ ('(1 PRE-TREATMENT CELL -wv 3:1 CONTOURS BELOW EL 896 BOTTOM = 894.00 i - � t Om M � W Q a STORM SEWER NOTES 1. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE: 1.7. REINFORCED CONCRETE PPE (RCP) WTRt R<GASKETS. 1.2. DUAL WALL HIGH -DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPE): DUAL WALL HOPE PIPE SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM SPECIFICATION F 2306. PIPE JOINTS, FITTINGS, AND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE WATER TIGHT. JOINTS SHALL RE BELL AND SPIGOT TYPE WITH A JOINT MEETING ASTM SPECIFICATION F 477. 2. FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING STORM SEWER AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. 3. STORM SEWER LENGTHS INCLUDE THE LAVING LENGTH OF THE FLARED -END SECTION. LAYING LENGTH OF APRON TO BE DEDUCTED FROM PAYMENT LENGTH OF -" PIPE. 4. o. TRASH GUARDS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL FLARED -END SECTION (SEE DETAIL 419A). 5. RIP -RAP IS REWIRED AT ALL PPE DISCHARGE POINTS. RIP -RAP SHALL BE TYPE III WITH TYPE IVGEOTEXTLE FABRIC. SEE DETAIL 411 B. 6. ALL HOPE OR METAL APRONS SHALL BE GROUND ANCHORED PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. �I I I I I I 1 I AIREA 60 GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 Bo 1 NOH: ]0 FEET J/ F INF. BASI PLOWE BOTTOM NWL 697. t ENGINEERING. INC. 100-YR M K O LAZE DRIVESUIT SURE 110 \L LINO LAKES. MN 55014 / PHONE (651) W14210 \ FAX (651) Ml 4701 \ DRAWN BV: CHECK BV n !_/ JOB O50 D12I11/23 H LOW AREA 4 HWL 897.0 I AREA 602 �100-YR I HWL 906.0 I I I I I I AREA 308 I I I I HWL 905.5 < / ' O O I \ I INF. BASIN 6 (SEE DETAIL) ' I BOTTOM 901.0 '. NWL 902.5 F \ 100-YR NWL 204.6 / J L / ---------------------------\\\ /'///-----------------� i I I I -I I I / I I � i I / I - � I \---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -ll EXCEPITION 20 EXISTING / HOUSE I I 7 EXISTING" I EXISTING I EXISTING HOUSE I HOUSE I HOUSE 's a � LLI I aQU)< Uo N�N U LL O LU 0z0o Z E u) Lu 1 () w Z o O J o W z 0_ 0 ¢ u Z Z) SHEET C3.2 22-2050 I-\ / BASIN DETAIL) BOTTOM BOTTOM 896 0 NWL 897.3 100-YR HWL 899.7 / L . \ \ ,a \ LOW AREA 4 100-YR HWL 897.0 GRAPHIC SCALE \ _ \ 30 0 15 30 60 \\ I \ I NCH=30 FEET \ I 1 1 \ 4I PRE-TREATMENT CELL v I 3:1 CONTOURS BELOW EL 896 I BOTTOM = 894.00 I /i' I I 6RE oaRRIR� // I 6EN� RNA PLOWE I I I i ENGINEERING, INC. \\ I I I z 6776 \\\\ I I \\ LAKE ORNE SUITE LINO I _ LINO LAKES. MN SSOIa \ \\\ II I I PHONE:(651) W14210 \\ I FAX'.(651)361d701 \\ I DRAWN BY: CHECK BY )) I I AGG MOE JOB NO: DATE: 22,2060 12JI1723 I 4 I I I I I I I I INF. BASIN 1 (SEE DETAIL) BOTTOM 896.0 I \ \ I NWL 697.5 100-YR NWL 900.3 I 1 I - PRE-TREATMENT CELL CONTOURS BELOW EL 896 BOTTOM = 894.00 e/ o INF. BASIN 2 (SEE DETAIL) \ BOTTOM 896.0 NWL 897.5 100-YR HWL 899.2 J / I I \ c / / o� 22-2050 NOTES 1. MARK -OFF BASIN AREA (E.G. FENCING, SILT FENCE, ETC.) TO PREVENT CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC FROM ENTERING BASIN AREA. 2. USE LOW-MPACT, EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT (WIDE TRACK OR MARSH TRACK EQUIPMENT, OR LIGHT -EQUIPMENT WITH TURF -TYPE TIRES) WITHIN BASIN. 3. PROTECT BASIN FROM RUNOFF DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITH TWO ROWS OF SILT FENCE AND/OR BIOROLLS. 4. DO NOT EXCAVATE BASIN TO FINAL GRADE UNTIL UPSTREAM DRAINAGE AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. 5. REMOVE ANY TOPSOIL AND/OR UNSUITABLE SOILS WITHIN INFILTRATION BASIN FOOTPRINT. ANY SEDIMENT THAT IS WASHED INTO THE BASIN SHALL BE REMOVED. 6. NO MINING OF SANDY SOILS ALLOWED IN BASIN AREA- 7 . EXCAVATE BASIN TO FINAL GRADE ONLY UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS. ALLEVIATE ANY COMPACTED SOILS DUE TO FINAL GRADING OPERATIONS PRIOR TO SEEDING. PROVIDE NATIVE SEED MI((E.G. MNDOT 33-261 Q 35 LBS/AC) ALONG BASIN BOTTOM EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SUITABLE FOR SEED94G (E.G. STRAW -COCONUT BLANKET)' "INSITU SOILS "ALLEVIATE ANY COMPACTED SOILS (BY USING A PRIMARY TILLING OPERATION SUCH AS A CHISEL PLOW, RIPPER OR SUBSOLER) TO A DEPTH NECESSARY TO ALLEVIATE COMPACTION INFILTRATION BASIN N.T.S. 1.0- WEAR COURSE (SPWEA240C) MNDOT 2360 TACK COAT, MNDOT 2357 2.0' NON -WEAR COURSE (SPWEB240C) MNDOT 236D 8.0- AGG. BASE, CLASS 5 MNDOT 2211 APPROVED GRANULAR SUBBASE AS DETERMINED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER (1) REMOVE ANY EXISTING TOPSOIL OR FILL DEEMED UNSUITABLE FOR INFILTRATION (GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO REVIEW ON -SITE SOILS) (2) N AREAS OF FILL, PLACE SALVAGED ON -SITE SANDY SOILS SUITABLE FOR INFILTRATION WITH <5% FINES (AS DETERMINED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER) 1. PAVING SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF MNDOTS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION 2. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO REVIEW PAVEMENT SECTION FOR MATERIALS PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. 3. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY CHOSEN VALLEY TESTING, INC. (91132022) FOR ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT INFORMATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS. BITUMINOUS — LIGHT DUTY N.T.S. 2.5' TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE SPWEA230B 4.0- AGG. BASE, CLASS 5 MNDOT 2211 APPROVED GRANULAR SUBBASE AS DETERMINED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER 1. PAVING SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF MNDOTS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION 2. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO REVIEW PAVEMENT SECTION FOR MATERIALS PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. 3. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY CHOSEN VALLEY TESTING, INC. (9/132022) FOR ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT INFORMATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS. HANSON BLVD — TRAIL REPLACEMENT N.T.S. SECTION B - B 12' DEPTH VARIES PER SLOPE SECTION A - A GRATE ELEV PER PLAN USE STAINLESS STEEL GRATE, SLOPE NEENAH R 4999CX HEAW-0UTY GRATE, OR EQUIVALENT PIPE OUTLET PER NEENAH BOOK, THIS PER PLAN CASTING HAS 0.4 SF OPENING PER LINEAL FOOT A Imo-- PER PLAN �I A ED 00000000 000000000000nnnM0000ol m PLAN VIEW 14' TRENCH DRAINS N.T.S. 2.0' TYPE SP 12Z WEARING COURSE MIXTURE SPWEB34OF 2.0' TYPE SP 12S WEARING COURSE MIXTURE SPWEB34OF 2.0' TYPE SP 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE SPNWB330B S.C' AGG. BASE, CLASS 5 MNDOT 2211 APPROVED GRANULAR SUBBASE AS DETERMINED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER 1. PAVING SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF MNDOT'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION 2. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO REVIEW PAVEMENT SECTION FOR MATERIALS PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. 3. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY CHOSEN VALLEY TESTING, INC. (9/I32022) FOR ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT INFORMATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS. HANSON BLVD PAVEMENT SECTION N.T.S. DEFLECTOR PLATE OVERFLOW 1a CENTER OF FILTER ASSEMBLY r OVERFLOWO2 -TOP OF CURB BOX - 10' FILTER ASSEMBLY CURB wklklq%N�l HIGH -FLOW FABRIC MIRAFIFF101 WIMCO INLET PROTECTION N.T.S. STORM SEWER STRUCTURE SCHEDULE 101 102 48" DIA. NEENAH R-3067-VB 103 2 x 3 NEENAH R-3067-VB 104 48" DIA. NEENAH R-3067-VB 105 27" DIA. NEENAH R-2577-A TYPE C 106 48" DIA. NEENAH R-3067-VB 107 2 x 3 NEENAH R-3067-VB 108 109 48" DIA. NEENAH R-3067-VB 110 48" DIA. NEENAH R-3067-VB 111 112 113 48" DIA. NEENAH R-3067-VB 114 2 x 3 NEENAH R-3067-VB 301 302 60" DIA. NEENAH R-3067-V 302A 2 x 3 NEENAH R-3067-VB 303 48" DIA. NEENAH R-3067-VB 304 48" DIA. NEENAH R-3067-VB 305 48" DIA. NEENAH R-3067-VB 306 48" DIA. NEENAH R-2577-A TYPE C 307 27" DIA- NEENAH R-2577-A TYPE C 308 27" DIA. NEENAH R-2577-A TYPE C 401 402 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 403 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 404 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 405 2 x 3 NEENAH R-3067-VB 501 502 48" DIA. NEENAH R-3067-V 503 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 504 2 x 3 NEENAH R-3067-VB 505 48" DIA. NEENAH R-3067-V 506 12 x 3 NEENAH R-3067-VB 601 602 27" DIA. NEENAH R-2577-A TYPE C 603 604 27" DIA. NEENAH R-2577-A TYPE C A 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 B 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 C 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 D 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 E 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 F 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 G 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 H 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 I - NOT USED - J K 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 L M 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 N O NOT USED P 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 Q R 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 S 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 S-1 12 x 3 NEENAH R-3067-VB T 48" DIA. NEENAH R-1733 U FA I '-REST A-VER\21150 CAD%20S l SILVERCREST BASE 12. DWG 22-2050 60' DIA. HAALA PS60-72H GRATE ELEV=901.05 ELEV-9W.30 TOP WALL=900.10 ORIFICE 1 - 6' DIA. INV 89750 - . O•' ORIFICE 1 NLET PIPE OUTLET PIPE INV 896.10 STRUCTURE INV 8%.10 WEIR WALL PROFILE VIEW FRONT VIEW BASIN 1 - OUTLET STRUCTURE N.T.S. 60'DIA. ELEV-900.35 ELEV=899 60 TOP WALL=899.. ORIFICE 1 -6' DIA. - INV 898.00 - O'.. ORFICE i INLET PIPE NV 897.10 OUTLET PIPE LA STRUCTURE INV896.00 WEIR WALL PROFILE VIEW FRONT VIEW BASIN 4 - OUTLET STRUCTURE N.T.S. 6P DIA. HAALA PS-72H GRATE ELEV=897.75 ELEV=897.00 TOP WALL-897.00 ORIFICE 1 - 8' DIA. INV 895.50 _ cy, ORIFICE INLET PIPE OUTLET PIPE e INV 893.90 STRUCTURE INv 693.90 WEIR WALL PROFILE VIEW FRONT VIEW MH K - LOW AREA OUTLET STRUCTURE N.T.S. 60' DIA. 60' DIA. HAALA PS60.]2H GRATE ELEV-9X).45 HAALA P560.72H GRATE ELEV=899.95 ELEV=899.70 TOP WALL=M.70 ELEV=899.20 TOP WALL=899.20 ORIFICE 1 - SDIA. ORIFICE 1 - 8' DIA. INV 097.50 INV $97.30 - - • ORIFICE 1 _ _� O: ° ORIFICE 1 - I�'_ . INLET PIPE ' INLET PPE OUTLET PIPE OUTLET PIPE e INva9s.30 STRUCTURE INV896.30 WEIR WALL INV 896.10 STRUCTURE INV89600 WEIR WALL P PROFILE VIEW FRONT VIEW PROFILE VIEW FRONT VIEW BASIN 2 - OUTLET STRUCTURE BASIN 3 - OUTLET STRUCTURE N.T.S. N.T.S. 60' DIA. HAALA PS60.72H GRATE ELEV=901 65 ELEV-9M.90 TOP WALL=900.80 ORIFICE 1 -6' DIA. INV 898.50 INLET PPE NV 89710 OUTLET PIPE STRUCTURE INV 896,00 PROFILE VIEW BASIN 5 - OUTLET STRUCTURE N.T.S. WEIR WALL FRONTVIEW HAALA PS60-72M GRATE ELEV=905.35 ELEV=904.60 TOP WALL=9O4.60 ORIFICE 1 -6' DIA INV 902.50 ORIFICE 1 INLET PIPE OUTLET PIPE a - INV 901.15 STRUCTURE INV. A WEIR WALL PROFILE VIEW FRONT VIEW BASIN 6 - OUTLET STRUCTURE N.T.S. 22-2050 O.D.+2' O. HDPE STORM SEWER PIPE INSTALLATION TOP OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT PIPENAL Dl4 WIDTHH WATERMAIN HYDRANT GATE VALVE SIR h BOX N 1 " W. C TI -IN NUM � COMPACTED BACKFILL — '�'I HACKFlLL® 4 CO70Z.NE BCURBFO.D.+2' L EiACKFlLL® PLOWEVARIES 00 2'-6" VARIES ENGNEERNG. NC. COMPACTED O.D COr� SAND OR PR /2 RUN GRANULAR MATERIAL 0.0 /4 (A- MIN) 9111111 COMPACTED BACKFlLL (N CORROSIVE SOILS USE GRANULAR ENCASEMENT) - CH/PIPE Q BEDDING Q r TRENCH WIDTH Q OUNDATION 0 75• "FUEXS REO FLD(STAKE" MARKER ON HYDRANT WITH a BLACK RUBBER CURB 24- BASE 6n6 WtE ORNE SUITE 110 LNO LAKES. MN 55o1a FAX, (6 (65t14701 0 FAX: (651)M1-0]O1 RA DRAWN BY: CHECK By HOE GRANULAR MATERIAL BEDDING COMPACTED O.D/2 1 1/2-CRUSHED ROCK O 1Q MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH: Minimum trench width shall be 1.25'OD+12" or a minim m or 16' plea the outside diameter, whotever is greater. See table. ® FOUNDATION: Mesa of unstable trench bottom shot] be excavated to o depth determined by the Engineer and replaced with suitable foundation material to 3' 6• NO: 22.2M DATE 12/11/23 BACKFlLL ,I 1� 12• _ _ DEPTH /S NEEDED TO STABIUZE TRENCH MIN. O.D./4 BUT NOT LESS THAN 10'. t the requirements of Note 8 below. ® meet �EIEDDIBedding Uickness shall be o minimum of 4' !or pipe diameters through 24 inches. Bedding thick— shall be 6' for d'—ts. larger than 24 inches The material shall meet the requirements of Note 8 below. ® HAUNCHING: This material is placed and compacted evenly on both sides of the pipe, from the top of the bedding elevation to the top of the pipe. The hounch/pipe zone material shall meet the requirements of Note 8 below. ® INITIAL BACKF1 Initial backfill is from the top of the haunch/pipe zone elevation to 6 inches above the top of the pipe. For traffic areas, initial COVER AS COVER WITH SPECIFIED PLASTIC (3 MIL.) r GATE VALVE CONCRETE ADAPTOR BLOCK _ REACTION BACKING FOUNDATION FOR backfill material shall meet the requirements of note 8 below unless roadway requireentsSPECIAL ® FINALnkment LL BACKFIFor trafficuappliccations, final backfill material and compaction 1/2 O.D. EARTH FOUNDATION PVC PIPE INSTALLATION STABILIZING OR DEWATERING OF TRENCH efforts shall be consistent with the Engineers parameters for the sob grade of the pavement cross-section which is 95% of Standard Proctor Density from the encasement zone to 3 feet below the surface and 100% of Standard Proctor Densit in the y piper 3 feet. MINIMUM COVERu Minimum cover shall be 18" for pipes 12"-42" in diomter and 24� for pipes 48"-60' in diameter for H-25 loadings measured from the bottom Class 5e flexible pavement or top of rigid pavement. Temporary ramping may be needed during construction to maintain cover depths for construction vehicles. ® TI Material meeting and installed per ASTM 02321 Claaa 1, u, a n as approved by the Engineer. MECHANICAL RETNNER GLANDS (MEGALUGS OR 1 1/2" WASHED APPROVED EQUAL) ON 8�(B"Xl6" ROCK ALL CONCRETE ALL JOINTS AROUND BLOCK MIN. 1/3 C.Y. (MIN. 1 C.Y. IN TYPICAL HYDRANT LAYOUT IMPERVIOUS (VALVE IN BOULEVARD) SOILS) 5/22,106 5/22/06 2/25/10 7/28/1a C I T Y O F STANDARD DRAWING NO. C I T Y O F STANDARD DRAWING NO- C I T Y O STANDARDNO_ DRAWING C I T Y O F - =_=': _-• FDOVE 101B DOVE 105A DOV9 t06 DOVE 201 D a w o U I I 6 Z 1.5' WHMUM COVER REQUIRED OVER >f w < W O (OR _ APPROVED N0. f:860 TOP OF la' OR LARGER WATERMAIN. 4• y TEES IGLJ as F 8 EWAL) &0' WNIMUM COVER REQUIRED OVER TOP OF 6' TO 6' WATERNNN. MADE TOP ADJUST TOP TO V BELOW TYLER NO. 6860 26' GRADE. BOX TO BE SET TO (OR MPR01E0 PROVIDE 12 OF AD.VSIIIEIIT MIN. 2 - 2- THICK INSULATION 6" COMPACTED GRANULAR FILL LAYERS WITH JOINTS STAGGERED AND EXTENDING A MIN. OF 4' EACH DIRECTION FROM WATER MAIN C/L ATM M t V MAx, B. s�ElI---I FENCE L I PNNIFD BLUE PROPOSED OR EXISTING 4 4QADWAY i <oO 3 w r4' a rc h U+ ,n a CI F to N O Uuf EQUAL) TYLER M0. 6960 OR APPROVED EOMYALENT EXTENSIQN MINIMUM 2 - 2" THICK INSULATION DYERS WITH JOINTS STAGGERED AND EXTENDING A MINIMUM CURB Box 8.5' 8' MN LONG AT NLL COVER EXTENSION C > O C w u) - w w o J x cI ? j 3 uJ i TYLS No. 5e 14' (OR APPROVED N0� 60 24' EQUAL) OF 4' EACH DIRECTION FROM WATER MAIN C/L MECH. COMPACTED COVER AS SPECIFIED W OR COI SERVICE A5 EXPECTED •• rc O o C p g LL E ow o - -� aF GATE VALVE ADAPTER BO CN mm NO. "W erU) BACKFlLL 6 SEWER $fLE, LENGTH. ANQ TYPE O CURB OF WTEIBAL FOR SEiMCE '�UNE A$ S LTtFIEO (SEESPEC) T11yryyTl LM III (OR wvacvm wAtERWs 2500 SERIES OR EQUAL) APPROVED EWAL AND CONFORMING TO AWWA MEGALUGS MEGALUGS BEND 2' BEND Loaf u--a SHQ,LD BE Na SUPPORT cuRe RICHER THPN TOP OF wATERMAIN 8BL0�1XYITH CONC. DENOTES !� YCC C-509-60 STANDARDS 3/4- GALVANIZED CORPORATON STOP WSULATE SERVICE IF <3' L o BASE J� r Cow-BLM GATE VALVE AND BOX TIE RODS OR MEGALUGS BEND BEND WATER MAIN INSULATION NOTE: INSULATE 4' WIDE ON CENTER FOR SERVICES SEWR, A N FROM STOWBELOW $EWER, ABOVE OR BELOW WATER SERVICE TO BE 3' FROM SWRNn' SERVICE. 4' THICK. 4'xB' SHEETS. WATER SERVICE DETAIL DENOTES I MEGALUGS BENDS BO]F5: Q 0 o ° O LLI LU J o Z Q W W :I) LU LU a 6/19/12 5/22/06 2/27/17 1. MEGAWGS m BE USED AT ALL MECIW�(YL JOINTM . 2. PLACE CONCRETE ROD( UIWER ALL GATE VALVES NW WMANTS 17F1RM 111D0KI1G AT ALL TEES, BOWS. MW AT HYDRANTS EVES SLE4_ ALL SOILS, T-BOLTS AND NUTS INSTALLED BOOW GRADE 3/6/08 9M11 BE "Cor-Blus OR APPROVED EQUAL 153. 0 O W Z O Q z o a C ITY O F DOVE STANDARD DRAWING NO. 202A C ITV OF DOVE STANDARD DRAWING No 203A CITY O F DOVE 37ANDARD OHAWINI Nf. 208B C [TY O F DOVE STANCAFD DFAWIN'_ Nn 210 39 SHEET C4.3 22-2050 INFI-SHIELD C:ATOR WRAP, OR RINGS (2 MIN., A APPROVED EOUPL, I' MAX. OF FROM CASTING RINGS & OVER RINGS TC ---� MORTAR) STRUCTURE. 1/2" MORTAR 27" ON OUTSIDE r AND BETWEEN T RINGS, CASTING HP AND MANHOLE. I �' FINISH SMOOTH ON THE INSIDE. A PLAN MANHOLE 14 W SLEEVE i 10 SEE DETAIL . N MIN. 2' i MIN 3 PIPE i •�,': 6• STAINLESS STEEL L 48, --� STRAP .• FLEXIBLE SECTION A —A SLED MANHOLE SLEEVE NO WOOD SALL BE USED FOR AD.VSTNG CASTING; CEMENT MORTAR ONLY. CAST IRON MANHOLE FRAME t COVER AS PER SPECIFICATIONS OBA2 B). -OLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON. N.UYYRAL OR STEEL RENFORCED PLASTIC. PER AST. C11F, LOCATED OVER ODYNSTRENA PIPE. PRECNST REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS PER ASTM 0473, FURNISHED WITH 0-RING GASKETS k LUBRIC.INT EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SPEL'f1ED. LIFT HOLES NOT PERMITTED IN MANHOLE SECTIONS. A 12- OR 16' BARREL SECTON SHALL BE INS ALLED UNDER THE CONE WHENENER POSSIBLE. PIPE CONNECTq TO YAINNIOIE SMALL BE MADE WATER TIGHT BY CAST INPLACE RUBBER SLEEVE 4 CEMENT MORTAR. INSIDE SURFACE SHALL BE FLASHED SMCCTH. PLACE -NAM-NECk' DfTSOE OF O-RING CASIFET AND WRAP LH SECTION JOWL WITH INFI-SHE W10R WRAP. OR APPROVED EGUAI, ON ALL LM40LE Jp BELOW WATER TABLE. AL MORTAR SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C210 AND MEET THE REOWREMENTS OF IVI Z506.28. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE, TYPE 301 '2j10/2021 (PIPES 27" OR LESS) _TANCARD GNAWING TY 0 F No CI . D OVE 301 E 1/2" MORTAR BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING AND MANHOLE. FINISH SMOOTH INSIDE. SURROUND RINGS WITH INFI-SHIELD GATOR WRAP, OR APPROVED EQUAL, FROM CASTING OVER RINGS TO STRUCTURE. RINGS (2 MIN., 7" 1.0' MAX. OF RINGS & MORTAR) SECTION A A A —A ALL STORM DOG HOUSES WRAPPED CEMENT WITH GEOTEXTILE MORTAR FABRIC. TYPE 4. y OVERLAP FABRIC -�1 � 12" ONTO ITSELF I I 6' PRECAST NOTES NO WOW SMALL BE USED FOR ADJUSTING CASTING; CEMENT MORTAR ONLY. A 12' OR IV BABEL SECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDER THE CORE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. CAST NON MANHOLE ERNE t COVER AS PER SPECIFICATIONS (1842 0). STEPS SNALL BE CAST ION, AUJI NUM DR STEEL REINFORCED PLASTIC, IDCATION AS SOWN. PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS PER ASTM C478. FILL OPENING BETWEEN PPE AND NNHOIE WALL WITH CEMENT MORTAR, GEOM SURFACE 91ALL BE . OVERU I FARM WRAP O ITSELF. DOGHOUSE WITH GEOTEXTIIF FABRIC. TYPE 4, OYERIM FMRIC 12' ONTO ITSELF. ALL MORTAR SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C270 AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MHOO] 25OB 2EL STANDARD 4' DIAMETER STORM SEWER MANHOLE '2/10/21 (PIPES 27" OR LESS) TY CISTANDARD DRAW MS 0 F DOVE " 407E NCTES: SAN SERVICE PIPE 6' NFTAI. FENCE Q - 4' METAL FENCE TO BE 3' FROM POST 1' BELOW WATER SERVICE FIN, GRADE POST MARKER 3• PAINTED GREEN SERVICE PIPE AND WYE MIN. t' TO BE ASTM D1785, SCH. 40 PVC PRESSURE STUB T TOP OF PLUG PIPE ABOVE " - ALL JOINTS TO BE 45' BEND CURB STOP SOLVENT WELDED. 45' WYE MIN 1' SERVICE STUB WYE a p 17. MIN GRANULAR BEDDING 1 AIR TIGHT CAP OR PLUG MATERIAL WITHOUT RISER R �4' METAL FENCE POST MARKER 3 PAINTED GREEN 6 METAL FENCE POST <_ 1' BELOW FIN. GRADE TOP OF MIN. I. STUB NOTES: SAN SERVICE PIPE PLUG 3' ABOVE F TO BE 3' FROM 450 BEND CURB STOP WATER SERVICE 45° WYE� MIN 1' SERVICE PIPE AND WYE STUB TO BE ASTM D1785, I IN. SOH. b PVC PRESSURE PIPE ALL JOINTS TO BE a SOLVENT WELDED. AIR TIGHT CAP o GRANULAR OR PLUG BEDDING MATERIAL SERVICE MIME WTRi RISER MAX 450 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WYE TO BE SERVICE DETAIL EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE (WITH CLEANOUT) 5/22/06 (2 BAGS MINIMUM) STANDARD DRAWING C I T Y O F N0. 9 DOVE 3 126 RINGS (2 MIN.. 1.0' MAX. 1/2" MORTAR BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING OF RINGS & MORTAR) AND MANHOLE. FINISH SMOOTH INSIDE. SURROUND RINGS WITH INFI-SHIELD GATOR WRAP. OR APPROVED EQUAL. FROM CASTING OVER RINGS TO STRUCTURE. PRECAST COVER ` TYPE II SLAB ..• 27- VARIABLE 2 STRIPS BTNMASNC (48" MIN.) SEAL ON SLAB JOINTS w� I U J O ALL STORM DOG HOUSES WRAPPE t M1/2- FT..' WITH GEOTEXTILE BASE 1 FABRIC, TYPE 4. MH SLAB -O ! OVERLAP FABRIC 12" ONTO ITSELF. DIA THICKNESS �, s4•-1o2" e" 108• 70' 120" 12" NOTE: NO WOOD SIVLL BE USED FOR ADJUSTING CASTING; CEMENT MORTAR ONLY. CAST NOW WNHOLE FRAME h COVER AS PER SPECIFICATIONS (1642 8). STEPS CALL BE CAST NON. ALUMINUM OR STEEL REINFORCED PLASTIC. LOCATION AS SHOWN. PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTORS PER AStM C478. FILL OPENING BETWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE WALL WITH CEMENT MORTAR, INSIDE SURFACE SHALL BE FINISHED SMOOTH. WRAP OUTSIDE OF 000OUSE WITH GEOTEXOLE FABRIC. TYPE 4, OVERLAP FABRIC 12' ONTO ITSELF. AIL MORTAR SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C270 AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNOOT 25%628. SHALLOW STORM SEWER MANHOLE 12/10/21 STANCARC C-AWING C I T Y O F N`' DOVE 409E 1/2' MORTAR BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING, AND SURROUND RINGS CONE FINISH SMOOTH WITH GEOTEXTILE ON THE INSIDE FABRIC. TYPE 4. WITH MINIMUM 6' CONCRETE COLLAR OVER FABRIC. 27' RINGS (2 MIN.. 11-0' MAX OF RINGS AND MORTAR) r ALL STORM DOG HOUSES GROUT INVERT TO WRAPPED WITH GEOTEXTIII: FABRIC. TYPE 4. OVERLAP ,. TORAH/PI2PE BENCH D FABRIC 12" ONTO ITSELF _ b CEMENT 40RTAR 6' PRECAST GONG. BASE NOTE NO WOCO SHMNL BE USED FOR ADJUSTING CASTING. CEMENT MORTAR ONLY. TYPICALLY USED FOR REM YARD DRAINAGE AREAS AND PAR W LOYS. CST IRON CATCH BASIN FRAME ! COVER CASINGS R-3250A UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. CAST IRON CATCH BASIN fRAME A COVER CASTINGS R-MODC SMALL W USED WHEN NEEDED IN A DRIVEWAY OR wRYOUNTABLL CURB. CAST RON CATCH BASIN FRAME k COVER CASTING R-3WW SHALL BE USED WHEN NEEDED N A COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY OR VALLEY GUTTER. CAST RON CATCH BASIN FRAME AND COVER CASTING R-2561A OR R-2535-A SMALL BE USED WHEN NEEDED IN A GREEN SPICE OR BACKYARD DRAINAGE AREA. WRAP FROM CASTING OVER RNGS TO STRUCTURE WITH INFI-SHIELD GATOR WRAP, ON APPROVED EQUAL. INSTEAD OF CONCRETE COlAR IN GREEN AREAS. PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE CONE SECTION AND PRECAST BASE PER ASTM C418, FILL OPENING BETWEEN PIPE AND YMHOLE WALL WRN CEMENT MORTAR. 04DE SURFACE SHALL BE FINISHED SMOOTH. WRAP OUTSIDE OF OOGHO SE WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. TYPE 4. OVERLAP FABRIC 12' ONTO ITSELF. ALL MORTAR SHALL CONFORM TO ASIM C270 AND MEET THE REWIREMENTS OF MNDOT 2508.28. 12/10/21 CATCH BASIN, TYPE 401 STANDARD DRAWING C i T Y O F NO. DOVE 401L 2O PULVERIZED TOPSOIL & STRAW FIBER BLANKET I FOR PIPES 48' & LARGER. USE 2.0'. re 4 2O THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE t RIPRAP, PULVERIZED TOPSOIL, Cn SEED, AND STRAW FIBER BLANKET IMMEDIATELY AFTER 2' A PIPE IS INSTALLED, EXTEND AREA TO MATCH UNDISTURBED SOIL. ODQO QSILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED AROUND THE TOP OF APRON 9 l 00 AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. ADD RIP -RAP 5D OVER TOP OF USE EOUIV. D " PIPE FOR ARCH PIPE 2• SECTION B-B � DITCH OR BASIN GRADE i 1 2' RIPRAP (MNDOT 3601) 6" THICK GRANULAR - Z� - FILTER (MNDOT 3601) SECTION A -A. MNDOT TYPE 4 GEO FABRIC (MNDOT 373 DID -DAD nnsMnnrc FrvY PIPE IA. I- A I IA. I A I IA. IP RAP 12" 6 24" 14 42" 35 15" 8 27" 17 48" 43 18" 9 30" 21 54" 50 21" 12 36 28 60" 58 NOTE REQUIREMENTS FOR RIP -RAP SIZE, THICKNESS, AND GRANULAR FILTER WILL BE DESIGNATED IN THE PLANS. GRANULAR FILTER AND FABRIC ARE INCIDENTAL TO RIP-RM. 11/17/2020 RIP -RAP AT RCP OUTLETS STANDARD DRAWN N0. TT)rl QN411E SURROUND RINGS 1/2" MORTAR BETWEEN- WITH CEOTEXTILE RINGS, CASTING, / FABRIC, TYPE 4, WITH AND TOP SLAB. MINIMUM 6- CONCRETE FINISH SMOOTH ON COLLAR OVER FABRIC. THE INSIDE. RINGS (2 MIN., 1.0' MAX. OF RINGS AND MORTAR) 27 PRECAST TYPE II COVER SLAB Z 2 STRIPS BITUMASTIC SEAL AI ON SLAB JOINTS "♦ I O CEMENT MORTAR PRECAST BASE •: . ° • ^ <' : `;7 MH SLAB VAR. Dlh TWCKNESS 4" 4 MIN. 48 6' VARl48LE 54"-10 8 108 10 ALL STORM DOG HOUSES WRAPPED 120 12 WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE 4, OVERLAP FABRIC 12" ONTO ITSELF NOTES: NO WOW SHALL BE USED FOR ADNSTING CASTING; CEMENT MORTAR CV{Y. CAST RON FRNE R GRATE CASTINGS TWE R-3250-A UNLESS OTHERWISE ARPROVED BV THE CITY ENGINEER. MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST ROW. ALUMINUM. OR STEEL REINFORCED PLASTIC PER ASTM CA IL LOCATION STALL BE EASILY ACCESSIBLE PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BASE SLAB A COVER SUB PER ASTM C478. PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS PER ASTM 0478. FURNISHED WITH O WNG CASKETS .LUBRICANT. FILL OPENING BETWEEN PIPE MO MANHOLE WALL WITH CEMENT NORTH. INSIDE SURFACE SAL BE PNISHM SMOOTH. WRAP OUTSDE OF DOGHOUSE WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. TYPE 4. OVERLAP FABRIC 12' ONTO ITSELF. ALL MORTAR SH LL CONFORM TO ASTM C270 AND MEET THE REOUREuENTS OF MNODT 2508.28. IT REFER TO PUNS FM SUMP DEPTIN, F ANY, CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE WITH SUMP, TYPE 405 1/10/20 STANDARD DRAWING 9k C [TY OF No. D 0VE 405K 2 FA 1/4-X1.5- MT BAR 516" $1Ap01H BAR O 2 O.C. EACH 'NAY 114-XI.S MT EM WING 1/4'X 41X 4' CLWS(4) f/z' SS ARCHON 'Ah BOLM SCREEN �, s 5` SCREEN B' MN. ABOVE DOGHOUSE TO 100 YEAR PRECAST STRUCTURE. FLOOD ELEVATION 5• i A4� NRVL 01VTL� PW IS P (YIN.) (1B• RCp ...+.r ) ANHIf 10'.1 WILT PIPE .� (OME P,pE POND ELEVATION TNAAI °WFDE�rE DER POUR INVERT TO LEI VEST PIPE INVERT ELEVATION 1' TO OUTSIDE OF MH FROM MT BAR (TPA) V5 SMOOTH BAR O 2 O.C. EACH WAY RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON SLOPE WITFI 1/41 S• SILT FENCE. NILVERIZED FIAT BAN RYW: TOPSOIL AND STRAW FIBER BLANKET AS 1/4-X4-U' CLRS SHOWND ONEO PLANSBy OR AS 1/2'SS ANCHOR BOLTS PLAN THE ENGINEER. 1/4"Kt r MT BARB POND 1W YR ARYL mu III YREf EL OIIRET • OIfRET EL CURET 1E STRUCTURE TABLE 2/06/22 POND SKIMMER STRUCTURE C I' T Y O <TANCAFD L.RAW'hi; N'_ DOVEF 417F 22.2050 wOR WALL TO BE CONNECTED To 2 EA. 1/4lI I.S' MT BAR SIRVCIURE @Y PRE -UST KEYED SLOT 5(8' O.C.ACH BAR O OR BY 3' X 3' ANGLE IRON ALONG EAcr 2 . EACH WAY SIDE OF THE VERIW:IL LENM OF THE WN SURROUND RINGS WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. TYPE 4, WITH MINIMUM 6" CONCRETE COLIAR OVER FABRIC. CONNEOTION sNAEL USE 4-}/4• , }/4• S5 WEDGE ANCHOR BOLTS SPAC D 6' O.C. JOINTS 1/4'X1.5' MT BM RING CONCRETE MAY BE POURED WITH CURB AND GUTTER. SHALL BE OROVTtD AM SEALED TO BE WATER PROOF. V42')f 4'X 4' CUPS(4) 1 2 SS ANCHOR / BOLTS(4) See City Plate No. 411A for Riprap placement. RINGS (2 MIN., 1.0' '� MAX. OF RINGS AND�� ) 3 t11 MORTAR BETWEEN ___ RING RINGS, CASTING. 1W YEAR ROOD ELEYATKIN SCREEN AND TOP STAB. FINISH SMOOTH ON THE INSIDE. ,- nlErEicHEEalw+c PLOWE ' NWL ,�F, 50' ` 9r •, ' h' Anchor Clip 5' PRECAST MWORCED CONCRETE / , // IXIST. BIT. ENGINEERING, INC. •'i ' %-StTEEN WEIR WALL p1FOW` W YEAR PIE -GIST CONCRETE to() WEIR WALL WITi ORIFICE. R000 ELEVATION (W. AS SPECIFIED) s4. e ? SV"' NW s` 6• V,Pt' ZA 4 �+ ALL STORM DOG HOUSES WRAPPED WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE 4. OVERLAP FABRIC 12" ONTO ITSELF j BIT. yrtgR / / ) (\ 6]]6 LAKE DRIVE surrE llo LINO LAKES. MN 55014 PHONE (651)361JI210 FAX.(651) M14701 DRAWN BY: CHECK AGO By MOE JOB NO DATE: 222050 12111/23 OUFIET RCP (.) (1$. 1p1 15' '. :._ ( RCP yR.) IWET POND ATUR INVERT < H SATE) LEVATION 1)NII OMF7C j E LARGER iU PIPE INVERT ELEVATION Tie last 3 pipe Joints. Use 2 tie bolt fasteners per Joint. Instalt at 60' from top or bottom 6� of pale. 6� NOTE: USE 4 FOOT DIAMETER 3' CATCH BASIN MANHOLE (421) WHEN DEPTH EXCEEDS 4.5 FEET. ` �...ti _ -- -- IT. BASE I' TO OUTSIDE OF FTlp1 Mr But (Tw.) h(8' SYOOTN U4R o 2 O.C. EACH WAY RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON SLOPE WRH Provide 3 anchor clips to foster, Trnsh Gunrd to Flared End Section H Hot dip gnlVaniit after f¢bric¢tion. NOTES: NO WOOD SHALL BE USED FOR ADJUSTNIG CAS11N0: CEMENT MORTM ONLY. IN NEW OEVELOPLNEMS CAST RON GiUME AND GRATE CASTINGS TYPE R-]501 -TB SHALL BE USED. CAST RON iRAME AID CFUTE CARIINGS tYPE R-}D6]-Y (ON A GRADE) OR R-306]-YB (LOW POINTS) SHALL BE USED IN RECONSTRUCTION AREAS OR AS CALLED OUT IN RUNS. MILL EXISTING BTTUMINIOUS 12" WIDTH K 1.5• DEPTH SAWCUT EXISTING FULL DEPTH 1/4'Ki3' SILT FENCE, PULVERIZED MT 8AR RtIC TOPSOIL AND STRAW FIBER BIANKEf AS PRECAST RUNFORCED CONCRETE BASE SUB PER ASTM C4]8. FILL OPENING BETWEEN APE AND MANHOLE WALL WITH CEMENT MORTAR. 1/4'X4'%4' CLIPS SH WON PLANS Y OR 1/2^s ANCHpt BOLTS THE ENGINEER. ISOMETRIC INSIDE SURFACE SHALL BE FINISHED SYOOM. WRAP DE SOF DOGHOUSE WITH %D OEOTELE FMRIC. TYPE 4, pVERIM FABRIC 12' ONTO RSElEL F. 1/L'X13' MT BARS PLAN ALL MORTAR SHML CONFgW TO ASTM UM AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT 25 28. DOGHOUSE SHALL BE GROUTED ON BOTH THE OUTSIDE AND INSIDE POW 100 YR NWL ORIFICE ♦ INLET ♦ INLET EL. OUTIET • OIfREi EL Ol1RET S MAXIMUM DIAMETER RCR STORY SEWER APE IS 15' ON THE SNORT SIDE AND 18' ON THE LONG SIDE OF CATCH BASIN. FLARED END SECTION e+ou SUMP TO PPE INER A 5UA6 CALLED «T IN PANS MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS STRUCTURE TABLE POND SKIMMER STRUCTURE WITH WEIR WALL 2108/22 3/4/10 CATCH BASIN, TYPE 420 2/22/16 3/08,09 TY OF �ND jTANDARD ➢RAVING ND 418F TY OF DOVE STANDARD DRAWING ND 419A CITY OFN" DOVE �'ANCARD DRAWING 420F C I TY O F DOVE STANDARD DRAWING NDOVE 520 o N U 0 a 0 m i 8 44Q(IMUM 5' METAL OR 2'K2IWOOD FENCE POST 'm¢ rc d o ¢p iy GEOTEXTILE WITH NET ` � � Y`r'O JgJG ? F N y O s W Q £ w § x rc Z w BACKING III DF �CIA I I BACKFILL MiN 6'MiN � _ U z U J Y w Lu a, g o ° s�a� a IS,¢artlrA Itt ar .s n.KL =axles IPIrxAx� II WASHED ROCK —' Z. GEOTEXTILE TO I OVERLAP TRENCH. THROUGH ,lN N II12 (� roia TYPES: STRAW. WOOD FSER, OR COIR ¢ U O z fi MIH WI,r NOTE -SILT FENCE SHALL CONFORM TO MNDO7 3886. TYPE B. n„$ ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Z U O Z J o Z 3 -FENCING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG CONTOURS OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER. SILT FENCE 12/26/00 I,za/z; ©m ®°u�¢°F,xtl1$az R'MiN®Frr`m M T`w,oNoNr a r x. T.I \ su.L a rN TYPES: WOOD CHIP, COMPOST, OR ROCK SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS .2/26/00 (/) UU Q I� 2 NL 0 Lu a a O G C ID STANDARD DRAWING CITY OF STANDARD DA.v: .'. � CITY 0 F STANDARD EIRAWIN7 N,=� 0VE 601 DOVE 602 DOVE 605 za 1 SHEET C4.5 22-205U i Px0➢ERINETER OF THE LIRE TECAMD AT T (DEALER x LxATEo AT THE ourER PERIMETER DE THE DRRLINE TREE PROTECTION DELINEATION NOTESTANDARD RN' HIGH ORANGE SNOV FENCE ON ONANDE SILT FENCE REM D STEEL IR Will. FENCE POSTS AS NEEDE➢ DELINEATION OF THE LINE PROTECTION 9 EXTEND CONTINLWSLY HROGN PROTECTION AREAS, TOTALLY SUtIA.N➢ IN➢IVIDIM SPECIKNS AS NOTE➢. IR EXTEND TREELME ACROSS THE FACE AND THE ENDS SHALL EXTEND WT. WX FOR TREE LINE PROMMOL 1 VOCOS 1 ELEVATION VIEW TREE PROTECTOR ' TREE PROTECTION DELI—TIE,DF..:NEPTION TREE PROTECTION FENCING 1/6/C4 STANDARD DRAWING 9 T l O F ND LDOVE A 610 NOTES I) WIXINW EXPOSED HEIGHT WT TO A) RETAINING WALL LOCATION SWVN W EXCEED 3.D' PLANS. 2) FILL ALL VOID AREAS IN WDILAR BLOCK 51 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP INKS WITH COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE DRIVE FOR PROPOSED NODIA-M (RnDOT 31 492HI BLDCK WITS 3) NODULAR BLOCK WITS MKT HAVE INTERLOCKING LIP OR PIN CONNECTIONS CAP WIT ♦ INCHES TOPSOIL E SOD �F BACXFILL WITH EXISTING SOIL CONST. ADHESIVE L TOP TWO CORSES — WIF LL WITH COARSE FILTER 5 t0 8 II —TE DOT�3149.2H) FIN, GEOTEXTILE TYPE I —DOT 37331 RIII 16' NAIL 6'o BACKFILL WITH EXISTING SOIL REIN P 6' 16N wfF CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE —DOT 2211) RETAINING WALL 3/17/14 STANGARG CRAWIN� C T T �' O DOVE 6>,A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: ANDOVER SENIOR CAMPUS niuii nnrn euP111111111eeo ■nnUITEnT 2 CARLSON PARKWAY, STE 335 6776 LAKE DRIVE NE, STE 110 1301 AMERICAN BLVD E, STE 100 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 JAY PORTZ ADAM GINKEL SARAH KERN, AIA, CDT 612-789-3363 651-361-8234 612-285-3891 3AYPORTZ@WEDUM.ORG ADAM@PLOWE.COM SARAHK@KAASWILSON.COM PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south and east of County Road 18, also known as Crosstown Blvd.; except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Winslow Hills 2nd Addition and Winslow Hills 3rd Addition. and PARCEL B: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, except that part platted as Winslow Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota. NOTES - Field survey was Completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 5/11/2022, 5/1Z/2022 and 1/8/2024. - Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum. - Parcel ID Number: 23-32-24-32-0006 (Parcel A) and 23-32-24-33-0002 (Parcel B). - Total boundary area - 655,508 sf (15.04 acres) Parcel area less proposed right of way dedication = 582,154 sf (13.36 acres) - Surveyed premises shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone X (Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.), according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Community No. 270689 Panel No. 0306 Suffix E by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date December 16, 2015. - Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. - This survey was prepared using a commitment for title Insurance prepared by Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Commitment No. 680387, dated effective June 20, 2023. - Site Plan by Kaas Wilson Architects - Civil Plan by Plowe Engineering. LEGEND* DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED Bolt AREAS O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLSir 41578 ♦ DENOTES SET PKNAIL PROPOSED LOT 1 - 319,653 SF ❑ DENOTES CATCH BASIN PROPOSED LOT 2 = 103,384 SF 13 DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX PROPOSED LOT 3 = 65,341 SF m DENOTES ELECTRICAL MANHOLE PROPOSED LOT 4 - 92,550 SF E) DENOTES FIBER OPTIC BOX PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY - 74,580 SF 6 DENOTES LIGHT POLE TOTAL PARCEL AREA = 655,508 SF `n, DENOTES POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES ® DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE r DENOTES SIGN ZONING D4 DENOTES GAS VALVE Per City of Andover Zoning Map dated 4DENOTES STORM SEWER APRON November 2023 this site is currently zoned M-2 Dd DENOTES WATER VALVE (Multiple Dwelling Nigh -Low Density). m DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL M-2 Building Lot Standards: E DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE Min. Lot Width = 150 feet —�As— DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE Min. Lot Depth - 150 fee[ DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER Max. Building Height = 35 feet — DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER Max, Building Coverage = 30% DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN M-2 Building Setbacks: r DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE Front = 40 feet r - Slde (Interior) = 30 feet L--i] DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE Slde (street) = 30 feet • Ps.s DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION Rear= 30 feet -�."-� DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS ....... .........._. County _ 50 feet An and from Road - K.. DENOTES ADJACENT PARCEL OWNER INFORMATION (PER ANOKA COUNTY TAX INFORMATION) I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. JASOILE—R.WO Date: 3/18/2024 license No. 41578 "" Professional Land Surveyors www.egrud.com 6776 Lake Drive NE Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55614 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 VICINITY MAP PART OF SEC. 23, TWP. 32, RNG. 24 eivral s Nq �w,w vpr` i N^4 srrE N4 _ ,mRLx.w CRY OF AADOVER ANOKA COUNTY, MMESOTA (NO SCALE) I r' 3 u a TYPICAL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: -------------- / •/ BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING ALL RIGHT \ ' •- / c �/ OF WAY AND EXTERIOR LOT LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. \ / O O♦ � � LOT 3� j / • -�_ MTURE RGUND-ABOUT Ar REQUIRE ADDmoraL /� \ O 1 RIGHT OF WAr DEDIUTION 1 1 III 3 ° NORTH Q I GRAPHIC SCALE N 0 3o 60 120 I INCH = 60 FEET BENCHMARK ANOKA COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. 2031 5 • i 5� ``` m v ELEVATION: 898.60 (NAVD 88 DATUM) OT110. ' l� j�i�/ �.. �o '// Y� , uDr1"uGe•4ND (—iO3wNuw1E.././ _ f 0$. p� �G g� eo ' • LOT o �o 0o AREA p101D1 319,9135E wyt PROPOSED i I 1i°" ,,,�'�, 337.24 025 BUILDING \88'20'28"6 GARAGE FLOOR o = 897.00 1 1 r FIRST FLOOR • 908.25 NW h \ 11-1 E 9q`°aJ'. \ \ rsr ' -• i - DRAINAGE AND N /f -� \fro I I I • p \ 8E I � I a • //%•rEXCEPTION I ._•_.. PERMANENT ROAD AND UTILRY / / / \ / \ \� R ^ .., EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1B808fi / �! \ \ �/ .— J ^ S - � z S88'20 2$'S I'„ 1 I 1 a n, I I .. EXLC E Pr 10N ® I MOD Ji I I13 6.17 e_1 07'Sy' _ I �—�T 150714 LANE NW (PUBLIC ROAD) 44 DRAwN BY: BAB ]oB NO: 240o14-P DATE: 2/6/2024 CHECK BY: 3ER FIELD CREW: B1VB3 1 2/z8/z024 CRY COMMENt5 BAB 2 3/IB/2021 CITY CO.-- BAB 3 NO, I DATE DESCRIPTION BY