HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC December 17, 1996
"
/
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
ular City Council Meeting - December 17, 1996
agenda
6:00 - Annual Review of City Administrator
Bookmark
~
/
Call to Order - 7:00 PM
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Consent Agenda
Approval of Minutes
Discussion Items
I. Public Hearing/Amend Ordinance 56/Sunday Liquor
2. Adopt Resolution/Sunday Liquor License Fee
3. Police Report
4. Lot SplitIVariance/17841 Bluebird St. NW/JiIl Spurgin, Continued
5. Review 1997 Developers Schedule
6. Bills SuperettelHanson Blvd. NW
7. Discuss Public Hearing for Tree Preservation Ordinance
8. Discuss "No Wake" Policy
9. Discuss Request/GOR-EM, LLC/Additional Building PermitslShadowbrook
10. Present Findings/Winslow Hills 2nd Add.! Calculations
II. Accept Feasibility Report/Order Plans & Specs/95-12/Well #6
12. Accept Feasibility Report/Order Plans & Specs/96-26/
Trunk S. Sewer & WMlWoodland Estates
13. Approve Funding for 1997 Calendar
14. Discussion on Non-Conforming Home Occupations
EDA Meetine
15. Adopt 1997 EDA Budget
16. Discuss AcquisitonlMistelskelHeidelberger
Non-Discussion/Consent Items
17. Adopt 1997 Fee Schedule fee
18. Adopt 1997 General Fund Budget genfund
19. Adopt 1997 Debt Service Budgets debtservice
20. Adopt 1997 Special Revenue Fund Budgets revfund
21. Approve 1997 Sewer Rates, Continued sewer
22. Adopt 1997 Water, Sewer, Central Equipment & PIR Fund Budgets watersewer
23. Approve Cabling Quote/94-30/City Hall Building cabling
24. Adopt 1997 Risk Management Fund Budget risk
25. Establish Fund Reservations fundres
26. Adopt Records Retention Schedule records
27. Approve 1997 License Renewal license
28. Approve Construction Change Directive/Adolfson & Peterson/City Hall Project/94-30 ap
29. Septic Ordinance Chapter 7080 as Amended chapter
30. Repeal Ordinance. 37/Septic Ordinance repeal
31. Lot SplitlVariance/4040 S. Enchanted DrivelKaldahl kaldahl
32. Relocation of Structure/I 705 I Crosstown Blvd. NW relocate
33. Approve GIS Contract gis
34. Order Bids/Fumiture Contract furniture
35. Award Bid/96-28/Well #3 Maintenance bid9628
Mayor-Council Input
Payment of Claims
Adjournment
minutes
phearing
adopt
sheriff
spurgin
schedule
bills
tree
nowake
shadow
winslow
acpt9512
acpt9626
calendar
home
mistelsk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
\
DATE: December 1 7. 1996
Approval of Minutes
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
City Clerk\\,
AGENDA SECTION
ITEM NO.
Approval of Minutes
The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
December 3, 1 996
Regular Meeting
December 4, 1996
Special Meeting
December 4, 1996
Truth in Taxation Meeting
. /
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
i
DATE: December 1 7. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Discussion Items
City Clerk
J.o '
ITEM NO.
Amend Ordinance 56/Sunday Liquor
\ .
A Public Hearing on the attached ordinance amendment has been scheduled for 7:00 p.m.,
December 17, 1996.
The ordinance amendment would allow Sunday liquor sales in establishments holding on-sale
intoxicating liquor licenses.
At the November 5th general election, the residents of Andover voted in favor of issuing Sunday
/ liquor licenses. This ordinance amendment is the next step in the process.
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
.I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The City Council of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:00 pm or as soon
thereafter as can be heard on Tuesday, December 1 7, 1996 at the Oak View Middle School,
15400 Hanson Boulevard NW, Andover, MN to consider an amendment to Ordinance 56, an
ordinance licensing and regulating intoxicating liquor licenses.
Said amendment will allow for on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses on Sundays in the City of
Andover.
All persons desiring to be heard will be given the opportunity at the above time and location. A
copy of the proposed ordinance amendment is available in the office of the City Clerk, City of
Andover, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, MN.
u~ fdL
Victoria V olk-City Clerk
. j
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
)
ORDINANCE NO. 56B
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 56, AN ORDINANCE LICENSING AND
REGULATING THE LICENSING, SALE AND CONSUMPTION OF INTOXICATING
LIQUOR WITHIN THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains:
Ordinance No. 56 is hereby amended as follows:
SECTION 2. LICENSE REQUIRED
Subdivision 6. Sunday Liquor Sales. On-Sale Sunday liquor licenses shall be issued only to hotels.
clubs. and restaurants which hold an on-sale intoxicatinl! liquor license onlv in conjunction with the
servin~ of food and which has facilities for serving at least 100 guests at one time. The hours of
the sale of intoxicatinl! liquor shall be between the hours of 1 0:00 am on Sundays and 1 :00 am
on Mondays.
An establishment serving intoxicating- Iiauor on Sunday must obtain a Sunday On-Sale liquor
license from the City in the same manner as applications for other licenses to sell intoxicating
) liquor.
SECTION 4. LICENSE FEES
Subdivision 1. Fees. The annual fee for a liquor license shall be as set by Council resolution for
an "on-sale" license, an "on-sale wine" license, and "off-sale" license, an "on-sale Sunday" license.
and for a special club license the fee shall be the maximum as provided for in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 340.11, Subdivision 11.
All other sections and subsections of the ordinance shall remain as written and adopted by the
Andover City Council.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 17th day of December, 1926...
CITY OF ANDOVER
Attest:
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria V olk, City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
)
DATE: December 17, 1996
Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
City Clerk ~. ~ '
AGENDA SECTION
ITEM NO.
Adopt Resolution/On-Sale
Intoxicating Liquor Sunday License.
~.
The City Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution establishing a license fee for
Sunday Liquor.
The proposed fee is consistent with what the surrounding cities charge and is the maximum
allowed by state law.
. /
)
CllY OF ANDOVER
COUNlY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
. )
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE FEE FOR ON-SALE INTOXICATING SUNDAY
LIQUOR LICENSES.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby resolves:
The following fee is hereby established for the year 1997.
License Fee
Ordinance
$200.00jyear
56
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 17th day of December, 1996.
CllY OF ANDOVER
/
J.E. McKelvey, Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
'. /
DATE: December 1 7. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Discussion
Administration
Richard Fursman
ITEM NO.
Anoka County Sheriff Monthly Report
8.
BACKGROUND:
The Anoka County Sheriffs Department will be present to provide the Council and the citizens of
Andover an update on happenings around the City.
)
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE December 17,1996
ITEM
Nl LS\ V AR 96-08
17841 Bluebird Street NW
Jill Spurgin
l-{.
K
Planning ~ \IV
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
AGENDA SECTION
Nl Discussion Item, Continued
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY:
John Hinzman
Request
The City Council is asked to review the lot split and variance request of Jill Spurgin at
17841 Bluebird Street NW. The applicant proposes to split the southern 2.05 acres
(Parcel B) from a 4.2 acre lot (Parcel A) in order to construct a new home. Variances are
being sought from the minimum lot size for both parcels, and from the minimum lot
width at front setback for Parcel B.
J
At the December 3, 1996 City Council meeting, the Council voted to table the item to
allow the applicant the opportunity to acquire additional acreage from adjacent land
owners. Results of the applicant's search will be presented at the meeting.
Please consult the attached staff report and Planning and Zoning Commission minutes
dated November 12, 1996, as well as the minutes from the from the December 3, 1996
City Council meeting for further information.
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - December 3, 1996
Page 6
"
Water and Sewer Rates, Continued}
It eed that more education needs to be done with the residents
regarding w er conservation. Mr. Fursman also pointed out that the
proposed rate ructure would apply to both residential and commercial
areas, which cou be a detriment to wet industries.
MOTION by Dehn, Seco ed by Kunza, to accept the Finance Director
directive for increasin water charges as well as incorporate some
written message to the com nity on conservation practices. Motion
carried on a 4-Yes, 1-No (Jaco on) vote.
Ms. McGann also reviewed the Staf to increase the
sewer rates in Area A $3 per quarter a increase them in Area B by $1
per quarter. This would generate appro' ately $22,000 of additional
revenue for 1997 to be used for future 1 rastructure maintenance.
Mayor McKelvey explained the difference in th two sewer areas was to
make up for an overcharge in Area A. That diffe nce was to be for a
20-year period, and he didn't know if they coul et unequal rate
increases for the two areas. He felt they have to be t same, even if
it means a large increase for Area A in 1999.
Ms. McGann stated she will recalculate the budget
increase for each area.
, J
LOT SPLIT/VARIANCE/17841 BLUEBIRD STREET 1M/JILL SPURGIN
Mr. Hinzman reviewed the request of Jill Spurgin to split 2.05 acres
from a 4.2-acre lot at 17841 Bluebird Street NW. Variances are being
sought from the minimum lot size for both parcels and from the minimum
lot width at the front setback for Parcel B. The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended denial based on the lack of evidentiary hardship,
the public testimony opposing the proposed use, the possible drainage
problem with the drain field of the septic system, that the denial of
the application does not preclude the property owner reasonable use of
the property, and that the newly created parcels would not be consistent
with the pattern of development in the neighborhood. Since the Planning
Commission meeting, the applicant submitted a letter to the Ccuncil
asking that they reconsider the Commission's recommendation.
Councilmember Knight questioned what is the hardship, which is the legal
reason for granting the variance.
Jill SDurqin. 17841 Bluebird Street NW - stated she is planning to build
a new home on Parcel B and to sell her existing home. She felt the
hardship is that this is the only oversized buildable lot in the
neighborhood. The only other use for the portion of the lot would be to
clear the trees and construct a pole barn. It is a beautiful lot, and
she didn't believe it would be possible to tell that the lots will be
\less than 2.5 acres. It seems a shame to waste the whole two acres.
JCouncilmember Jacobson agreed there does not appear to be a hardship,
especially since the area was platted and developed after the adoption
of the ordinance.
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - December 3, 1996
Page 7
\
'- )
- (Lot Split/Variance/17841 Bluebird Street NW, Continued)
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Dehn, the Resolution of the Planning and
Zoning Commission and concurring with their findings. DISCUSSION:
Attorney Hawkins advised the legal reasons for granting a variance are
hardship due to the physical characteristics of the land and an owner is
denied reasonable use of the land. It cannot be due to economic
reasons. Council noted the only way to increase the size of the two
parcels would be to purchase land from the adjacent property owners.
Rather than deny the request at this time, Mayor McKelvey suggested the
item be tabled to allow Ms. Spurgin time to check with the neighbors to
see if she could buy additional property to be able to create two 2.5-
acre parcels. The Council agreed.
Councilmembers Jacobson and Dehn withdrew the Motion and the Second.
MOTION by Jacobson,
regularly scheduled
carried unanimously.
Seconded by Kunza,
Council meeting on
to table
December
this to
17, 1996.
the next
Motion
PRESERVATION POLICY
Eric Ison, Forestry Intern, stated the draft Tree Preservation
\Ordinan before the Council is similar to the existing policy except
/for the e orcement portion. Fines would now be imposed if there is
encroachmen into a tree protection area. This policy is also much
shorter and e ier to read than the policy viewed by the Council in
September. The ree sections apply to development, to residential home
construction and ~ Special Use Permit applications.
Page 3, IV, B, clarify he last sentence to read: As a guideline, tree
removal in areas on tfl development site where the aforementioned
activities are not schedu d to occur should be limited to 10% of the
total remaining forested are on the project site.
Councilmember Jacobson asked if t 's policy had been in effect, would it
have prevented what happened in the hadowbrook development. Mr. Olson
stated no. It is more complex than j t saving trees. Other components
of the site development must also be co idered such as the grading and
drainage requirements. Mr. Erickson plained there was a soils
balancing issue in Shadowbrook, plus the City is now working with
developers to do custom grading in an attempt avoid such massive tree
removal in developments.
Winslow Holasek - didn't see much difference in policy from the
present policy. There is a big difference between the "shalls" and the
"shoulds" . Even the trees that aren't the most desir Ie are better
~~an no crees. He wanted to know if the policy will stop e situation
\c~at occurred in Fox Woods where the trees were destroyed to ~commodate
/the storm sewer system. If the concern of the Council is to reserve
trees, he didn't think the current policy does that. ~
'.."
,
,
, J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -96
A RESOLUTION DENYING THE LOT SPUT\V ARIANCE REQUEST OF JILL
SPURGIN TO CREATE TWO PARCELS PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 40
AND VARYING FROM THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 6.02,
MINIMUM DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17841
BLUEBIRD STREET NW (PIN 02-32-24-24-0001).
WHEREAS, Jill Spurgin has requested a lot split\variance to create two parcels pursuant
to Ordinance No. 40 and varying from the provisions of Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02,
Minimum District requirements for an R-l, Single Family Rural District on property
located at 17841 Bluebird Street NW, legally described as follows:
, \
That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 32, Range 24, in
Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point on the
South line of said Northwest Quarter, distant 1400 feet East of the Southwest
comer of said Northwest Quarter; thence North, assumed bearing, and parallel
with the West line of said Northwest Quarter a distance of 631.00 feet to the point
of beginning ofland to be described; thence continue North on same described
line a distance of245.78 feet; thence northeasterly on a curve to the right having
radius of248.59 feet a distance of243.11 feet; thence North 56 degrees, 02
minutes, 00 seconds East a distance of210.57 feet; thence South 22 degrees, 47
minutes, 44 seconds East a distance of 298.45 feet to a point which is 1800 feet
East of the West line of said Northwest Quarter as measured along its South line
and 930 feet North of the South line of said Northwest Quarter as measured along
its West line; thence South and parallel with the West line of said Northwest
Quarter a distance of298.83 feet; thence westerly and parallel with the South line
of said Northwest Quarter a distance of 400.01 feet to the point of beginning.
. J
Subject to an easement for road purposes over the westerly and northwesterly 33
feet thereof.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has
determined that said request does not meet the criteria for granting the request pursuant to
Ordinances No.8 and 40.
i
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would have a
detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of
Andover; and
\
I
/
\
. /
,.
Page Two
LS 96-08 Variance
17841 Bluebird Street NW
December 17, 1996
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was opposition to the request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council
denial of the lot split\variance as requested for the following reasons:
I) Lack of evidentiary hardship according to the use ofthe property.
2) Possible drainage problem with the drain field of the septic system.
3) Public testimony of adjacent neighbors in opposition to the proposed use.
4) Denial of the application does not preclude the property owner reasonable use of the
property .
5) Granting the variance would have significant impact of the neighborhood; that the size
of the newly created parcels would not be consistent with the pattern of development in
the neighborhood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover
hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and
denies the lot split\variance on said property.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this.l1ili day of
December, 1996.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey, Mayor
Victoria V olk, City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE December 3, 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Nl Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
ITEM
Nl LS\ V AR 96-08
17841 Bluebird Street NW
Jill Spurgin
Planning -SVJ.~
John Hinzman
BY:
Request
The City Council is asked to review the lot split and variance request of Jill Spurgin at
17841 Bluebird Street NW. The applicant proposes to split the southern 2.05 acres
(Parcel B) from a 4.2 acre lot (Parcel A) in order to construct a new home. Variances are
being sought from the minimum lot size for both parcels, and from the minimum lot
width at front setback for Parcel B.
/
At the November 12, 1996 Planning Commission meeting, two neighbors spoke in
opposition of the proposed lot split and variance. They expressed concern for the loss of
trees, lowered property values, and setting a precedent for the division of other lots in the
neighborhood. The applicant has provided a letter addressing those concerns.
Recommendation
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial of the lot split request. Please
consult the attached staff report dated November 12, 1996 and the minutes from the
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting for further information.
/
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
\
\. j
(Public Hearing: Special Use Permit - Real Estate Si
Estates, Continued)
, Timber Ri ver
Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - November 12, 1996
Page 2
The Commission noted it is troublesome that is sign plus several
others have been erected before receiving t proper permits. In this
case, the applicant is a developer who has orked in the City and should
know the regulations. Commissioner Pee felt it is a policy decision of
the Council as to whether to remov the signs until the Special Use
Permit is issued. Chairperson ires concurred with that issue and
felt it should be addressed ut he also felt the sign meets the
cri teria for the Permit. mmissioner Wells was concerned with the
developer selling lots ore the property is platted. Commissioner
Peek pointed out the ntent of the sign indicates it is not platted.
Chairperson Squires ndicated if contracts are signed, it is between the
person and Wood1 di the City is not involved.
MOTION dtke, Seconded by Peek, to forward to the City Council for
approval e Resolution prepared by Staff for the request for a sign by
Woodl d Development, with an attention to the City Council to review
th policy of signage. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Apel,
rry, Putnam) vote. This will be placed on the December 3, 1996, City
Council agenda. 7:23 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING: LOT SPLIT/VARIANCE - 17841 BLUEBIRD STREET 1M - JILL
J SPURGIN
7:23 p.m. Mr. Hinzman reviewed the request of Jill Spurgin to split the
southern 2.05 acres from a 4.2-acre parcel at 17841 Bluebird Street.
The existing home was constructed in 1972 and was purchased by the
applicant in 1992. Parcel A is proposed to be 2.15 acres containing the
existing home, which would be sold. Parcel B would be 2.05 acres and
would be retained by the applicant for the construction of a new house.
Variances are being requested to the minimum lot size and lot width at
the front setback. Staff has looked at other options to split the
parcel so one lot would meet the minimum size requirements, but it
appears the split as proposed would have the least impact to the
property owner to the south and would provide the least amount of tree
. loss. The current septic system is located on the south side of the
house and the well is in the front. The septic system would have to be
updated to current standards before it is sold. Borings have been taken
for the relocation of that system. No variances would be needed for the
existing house if the lot is split as proposed.
MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Luedtke, to open the public hearing. Motion
carried on a 4-Yes, 3-ADsent (Apel, Barry, Putnam) vote. 7:28 p.m.
Jeff Zinnecker, 17745 Bluebird Street NW - is located immediately south
of this parcel. He is concerned with the variance and with setting a
precedent in the neighborhood of subdividing lots. The entire street
has lots of 2.75 acres or more. The homes are staggered down the road.
The concern is the subdivision to smaller lots will decrease their
property value. From their property, they are able to see Ms. Spurgin's
Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - November 12, 1996
Page 3
\
.I
(Public Hearing: Lot Split/Variance - 17841 Bluebird Street, Continued)
house now that the leaves are gone. Another house between them would
mean they could see it all of the time. Their house is on the north end
of their lot. He is against the variance. Commissioner Peek noted almost
all of the other lots have 300-foot frontages, and this seems to be a
unique lot in terms of its size. As for precedence, this is a differenc
situation from all of the other lots which are basically rectangular and
could not be subdivided.
Lori Zinnecker. 17745 Bluebird Street NW - stated it is also a privacy
factor for them, which was the biggest reason they bought their house.
She felt the quality of that woods and privacy would definitely go down
in that they would be able to view a house looking out the side window.
They also have a pool in the back in a private area, and this would
definitely decrease the value of that privacy as well. They purchased
their house in 1990 before Ms. Spurgin.
Jill Souroin. 17841 Bluebird Street NW - stated she has the same concern
as the Zinneckers. That is why she is asking for a variance. She too
enjoys the trees. It would be her intent to keep as many trees for her
own privacy as well. That is why she likes living out there.
Vione Luikens. 17844 Bluebird Street NW - built their house in 1972.
She has the same concerns as the Zinneckers. If everyone started
\ subdividing their lots, it would ruin the aesthetics of the development.
\ J They expected their privacy to be maintained, which is the reason they
moved out there. They get a lot of comments about how beautiful
Bluebird Street is, and she felt it would take away from the value of
the properties if the lots were subdivided to build more houses.
MOTION by Luedtke, Seconded by Wells, to close the public hearing.
Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Apel, Barry, Putnam) vote. 7:36
p.m.
Mr. Hinzman reminded the Commission that one of the criteria for a
variance is that the owner is denied unreasonable use of the land due to
a hardship caused by the characteristic of the land. That term can be
elusive because the hardship cannot be created by the property owner nor
be an economic factor. One of the determinations being considered for
a variance is the significant frontage along Bluebird Street of the lot,
which would allow adequate room for another house to be built if the lot
was split in two. Commissioner Wells noted the newly created lot would
be smaller than all of the other existing lots. Doesn't that create a
hardship on the other end for all of the other property owners? She
felt the construction of a new house would mean a significant amount of
tree loss. There is also the issue of oak wilt through that area, which
could preclude existing privacy.
Commissioner Peek asked if this area was platted under the current City
ordinance or before it. In the past they have considered variances
) similar to this primarily because the properties were developed prior to
the adoption of the platting ordinance. If this area was platted prior
to the adoption of the ordinance, it would be consistent with variances
Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - November 12, 1996
Page 4
'j (Public Hearing: Lot Split/Variance - 17841 Bluebird Street, Continued)
approved in the past. This hardship is primarily one of the platting
process. He doesn't see this as an issue of setting a precedent for the
subdivision in the rest of the development. If this was platted under
the ordinance, is it pushing it in terms of lot acreage with the 20
percent variance on lot size for Parcel B.
Mr. Hinzman suggested the Commission table the item temporarily while he
goes to City Hall to research the date this area was platted. The
Commission agreed. This item was continued later in the meeting.
DISCUSSION - REVIEW OF ORDINANCE NO.4, MOVING OF BUILDINGS
Johnson explained Staff will be placing three to five ordinances on
lanning Commission agenda for discussion of updating and revision.
The f st one is Ordinance 4, Moving of Buildings. All references to
Grow To ship will be changed to City of Andover. Staff feels the
ordinance requires a lot of red tape and that the requirements for
insurance, onding and cash deposit should be deleted. Many other
communities 0 not have a moving ordinance because of the regulations
under the Uni rm Building Code and State Statutes. There is also a
provision in Or 'nance 8, Section 4.11 that addresses the relocation of
structures. Sta is recommending that provision be moved to this
ordinance. It is so the Staff's recommendation that an applicant
should go through a ecial Use Permit process, so the residents of an
area where a structure ill be brought to will be notified.
j
Chairperson Squires state that the provisions of Ordinance 4 and the
section in Ordinance 8 are ifferent, in that Ordinance 4 relates to
moving the structure, and Or ' ance 8 deals with the requirements once
the structure reaches its final estination. Though they are different,
he thought they could be comb); ed to one moving and placement of
buildings ordinance. He also fel that since 1968 when the ordinance
was adopted and 1979 when it was ame ded, State law has regulated many
of the things this ordinance tried to dress. Any conflicts with State
law should be removed from the ordinanc including the entire Section
4 dealing with cash deposits, bonds and i surance.
The Commission generally agreed to the
outlined by Staff.
to the ordinance as
DISCUSSION - REVIEW OF ORDINANCES NO.6, REGULA TIN
Mr. Johnson stated Staff feels there is a need to keep e ordinance in
olace even thouah there are no areas zoned for mobile hom parks in the
Cicy. He also s~gges~ed Staff contact several of ~he 5urro ding cities
to compare ordinance requirements. The Planning Commissio suggested
the League of Minneso~a Cities be contacted and that the City
\ be contacted to be sure the ordinance is in line with other or
~ / and current State law.
FILE No.010 11/26 '96 08:21 ID:CRUSADER PROGRAM
FAX:
PAGE 2
, j November 22, 1996
Mayor J. E. McKelvey
City of Andover
Andover City Hall
16B5 Crosstown Boulevard N.w.
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Mayor McKelvey,
My name is Jill Spurgin and I have lived in Anoka county all my life and at 17841
Bluebird Street, N.W. In Andover for over four years. The reason for this letter is
to ask for your favorable consideration of my lot spllVvariance request at tha next
meeting of the City Council.
. )
After meeting several times with Andover City officials, I submitted an application
to split my oversized 4.23 acre property into two parcels of 2.15 acres, with my
current home on it; and 2.05 acres. where my new proposed modified two story
home would be built. Both parcels are heavily wooded.
At the November 12th Planning Commission meeting the City Staff
recommended the lot spllVvarlance be granted. However, the Planning
Commission recommended not granting the variance. Following are their
reasons along with my reply to the concerns:
1. Drainage - The proposed new parcel was deemed absolutely "buildable" by
Building Official Dave Almgren. Mark Tradewell. who did the soil borings,
also said there would be no problem.
2. Neighbor concern - Two neighbors attended the meeting. the neighbor
directly across the street and the neighbor directly south of my current home.
Their Issues were:
a. Loss of privacy - I, too, am concerned with privacy. I fully appreciate
the privacy and beauty the trees in our neighborhood provide. that is
exactly why I want to stay in my current neighborhood. I believe a new
home nestled in the middle of two plus acres of trees would not deny
myself or any neighbor the privacy we now enjoy.
I believe denying my request because my neighbors are upset about tree
loss on MY property places an unfair burden on me to provide them
privacy and does not allow me to fully utilize my own property.
~
)
FILE No.Ol0 11/26 '96 08:21 ID:CRUSADER PROGRAM
FAX:
PAGE 3
\
/
2
Ma)'ol' J. E. McKelvey
City of Andover
Nllvcmber22,1996
b. Lowering of Property Values - The home I am hoping to build would be
valued in approximately the $150,000 plus range. I believe this would
place my new home at 1110 high end of the neighborhood valuation scale
thereby putUng only myself at risk If either lot Is subsequently deemed not
as buyer-attractive. Our neighborhood is made up of many different
styles of homes positioned in all different directions on the various lots. I
feal the positions of the homes in the neighborhood and the fact that most
of the other lots are rectangle in shape make it almost impossible for the
casual looker to discem where property lines are. Furthermore, I believe
most home buyers are more Interested in the amount of land their
prospective purchase would include rather than in the amount of land
each neighbor owns.
c. SerrJng a Precedence - Since I believe my lot is the only oversized,
buildable lot on our block, I do not believe the granting of this variance
would set a precedence. At least one member of the Planning
Commission also recognized this.
, /
3. Hardship - I believe my circumstance is unique in that J have the only
oversized buildable lot on my block. I do not believe the granting of this
variance will alter the neighborhood aesthetics. 25 years ago my
neighborhood was zoned for (rural) 2.5 acres. With all of the growth Andovor
has experienced in the past several years, and with the different zoning
throughout tile Cily, I do not believe the splitting of this 4.23 acre parcel
would stand out as a negative overall. The granting of this lot split/variance
request would allow for good, practical usage of the two plus acres to the
south of my current home.
This request was not made on a whim. I gave it considerable thought and spent
a fair amount of money to even validate the request was a possibility. Prior to
my purchase my home had been left vacant after being rented for some seven
years and the home and lot were left in shambles. At the time of purchase I was
married to a carpenter so the purchase of a "fixer upper" was not a problem.
Since purchasing this home I have spent some $15,000 plus in renovations.
However, the home Is stili 24 years old and In need of ongoing repairs/updates.
My reason for wanting to build a new home is that I am now a single parent and
find the upkeep of an older home that uses off-peak electric heat supplemented
by a woodstove just too burdensome.
I am not requesting a variance to squeeze a house into a neighborhood where
homes are spaced eQually apart so that it would stick out like a "sore thumb",
Both parcels would still be two plus heavily wooded acres each, a nice piece of
'I property in any suburb.
FILE No.G1G 11/26 '96 08:21 ID:CRUSADER PROGRAM
FAX:
PAGE 4
3
Mnyor J. B. McKelvey
City of Andover
, / N ovelllber 22. 19%
. /
I hope you'll find that all things considered fairly my lot split/varlance request is a
reasonable one. I truly believe that at worst there will be a net no difference to
my neighbors and at best could possibly increase the property values.
Additionally, it would be a positive for the city In that It Increases the tax base in
an existing neighborhood. Although I know schedules are hectic and busy I urge
you to drive down Bluebird street and see for yourself. I do not feel white paper
with black property lines do this property justice.
I know that change makes some people uncomfortable and variance requests
are about change. However, this shouldn't in and of itself make change a
negative. I am hoping you will consider and accept the City Staffs
recommendation to approve my lot split/variance request on December 3rd.
Sincerely,
a~~~~
tZ".-sPUrgin
434-0570 (home)
572-6610 (work)
cc: City Council Members
. I
. z z
. . z :;; . . . .
. . z z :;; z z . . . z
z . . . ~ ~ z ~ z z
z :;; ~ :; ~ z
z z z ~ w . . ~ ~ ~ :;; ~
~ . ~ z z z ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~
~ z ~ 0 :;; ~ ~ i: << y w z ~ ~
w ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ u << i ~ . c c
~ t; z << ~ . . ~ ~ 0 c
~ ;; w w w :: w ~ ~ ~ ~ << ~ ~ . :; << 0
~ ~ . z u z w . ; ~ 5 ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ . . 3 0 ~ z ~ 2 ~ << C
C ~ << << ~ ~ Z
C u m j ~ ~ ~ << ~ ~ 2 is :;
~ ~
I I' I" !' !
I' . '2' ., , . I'
--t:-' ,If--'--' ,~
:~~~+Iirs~
.f. ~-....,'Y ,-
, I , '
, '\;;; :'1 '- ' I
\..,H,i, i :
, i V f-- I
/:,1
::t.~7l(. i ![
i III
T-..;.,.7j 'I
I "
. ,
\ l\ II ill
YA. I i'l
/ \ ~,I-
1 i ~ I II ,[
I I I I
_______ _' ! I !
'17t~------ I I t
- -"- -=-=--~~---~ _. ::j
I ,'" ----r----- !i
/ I ' I I I IIi
I I!. .i
I ~ II Ii,:,
~ II'
,,11
I I,.:
.)-, l 1 ;:;~ Iii':! g I' ~ r-'
,', I co 0
',',I 1 i':;;:; 1 ~ //
''::;:;:;:;: ~ ---- ii, I -/~
j O<O;oooL~_c-~ !f'-;~,,~. ___m_m--_~_---~#o~
: --::::.... _ II LJI:5 I ' 1 . I I '
',~ : _ -I"""''E;:''''''<:J'~''''',J .' ~ f~l< ' In',' \' Ii "=
-~ ~" ! r~.:.-:-, [91!"" ~
i I I Iii ~---<-~ I
.:t I ! ' _..r'J
," " _ /.v -~~- I
I~I T ---': 1-1.l? 1 ~~.:t.-_ ......... ·
I'll - :/ ~h' ---<'~_.,
r---, ii"
,- ~ ~. I i I! , '....'....
t ,~'i ""
I
': ' ~ 3 --1
= '-::
. " )
-, -uc-__
, i(
~'
I
I :-
!
r
, :,
1
--- -- r
, --- ----
!
~~
'"
ii:
:
~
p~
i
,
L
:di:
"""'-1 I
/ I
L_
, -
I ~. _.
~ \ ~: G Ii
~ r\ ci- LJ:
I: .~ I
----_-1__ ~
--- ll: ---
__ i i i
. \(~ ';J
~~,~
if n!
~ 7
. '
-j; -7
f -7,"-
~, ,
. I
>J.' ,
').,.AI c;'
'.
-
---
.; J 10
~"
=~
~- .: J.
. ,
rJ()W$
~'- I,'
ADD. '
, '
,
, ,
. -,
, ,
, "
1 I ..... " I
~ I ""1,
~-~--6 ____..2',',
II g "":....',
i ~I I '
,j)
I
--j
,
,
.... , ;
,
,..
, l
i
i
,
---
---f ~:A~
~ . ~ .
1'",-
, - ".-~
',I - '.11
-
..'.....t..
I
! -
It--
I !.-----
,
I I
I I
I
i!
,
I '
LI
,
~
~
n
u
L
---I--
: !
r==
L~. :ARO \,1 \
.. LAKE (' I
~' ~:
'"'" ~ T
I
I
I
I
-- -~
/'
/
I ~O'-.M8r:~ . ./
~~~~~:
,~~ I.~~-
",~J ,.
~.. ESf~
.;
l
I A'oo.~1 B .
I ,
I
I
c-----j , .
~
~ I l~
I ,~!-
'Li':~1\
~~~ /
.-
--I
'-",
-- - I
r
..._~........ .........' .~t' ..-J _, ~
'_..~""t:.!.!I~ ~ ~::,:'.;.... -
~.:""''''~'~';.2'
1 ..,.....~'-J')O' ~ 'f .
~:.:"'~: ';;;,~~: ~~ I ;..;
/r;r~/~-",;;';'-
... ': ~-jr' -
",
. :,j ~".
..
".
~
..~~"',M.,
.......'........
!.~..- ..:.:-:~..
',,- ..~~~. >"
1'_ A'.._
.0
._~~_. ......../
;.jJ~ ..... .
.;;~..~':: ::#::.. j
0_ d. .ft .... ,.<
~..' ..,~ ~. ,JIt:.,.. . _.
. ~r, ~~,t$, ..1;..-J,1f ~-
.." .......,..~ ~.... -' ..-"
~:';:Vi."~,'~,~ ..
...-;~:~....,~.~.~ -
~, .;:~~~:~f.
': t' ~;~)?~'~-..:.;AI;. i.-" ..,.
. ...~ ~ :;;;; ';:-;'I!:{lGI ,," ~ i .,
_ ~ .. ~ _. ~~ ~. "'" i<YZ
~~...t&" . \"'{~"-.,~.. . I sg
r?r_._. .. "".o;...~~" - :9
- 'I~."
. ,
. .-
,-
-:. . :"'-'t';~,j; '<
.. :.-~j..: :';-.- ,-
i: ".. .:... .
-." ~
......
." ..
. .,-(J',r...,c1:"-
,.1('1._
".! dJ".
.1"
-...
~f.i
---..--~"~,.'
~. ~~ ,,-~' ..~
~.
...
.1
.
.,
. d"~; JI'
. ';
-- -
- '~'-' '..
-'.'.~'
. .
< ..7
.., ,
-i~;:~.' ' .~.
... .,.-..;....- ...
.~"!:'
.-
.. .
..
"
(-1' ....
,
frO"
;C
,
;;.
..
.-.fi
....
.,
,.
.... ..
,-":bl~IVE"~~:
'"
~~.... ..,;.~....".. ,.. .,j/T
,.... 1., -. -"
~.S .,~. - "'.,,,'
.:":':.:. ~ ...~,'_.. ~ - .
_, '.#:'~. .0 '.'
,....ll.~'" ,"
w.~_ ..:-,;~~..
~t;-~._~~. . :_.~
\.. . . . '::~-~'.~':.1'~-;' <.
...':.;'- , .'-
.._ -. . ~ ...:---t _ . ,--
#'~~ \-
..~., I
....;
<
.,.
",
~
~~
-r.__fIl
,
..,..
~
...
..
,.'
,.
.'-If"; ,
-'
/'
J
/'
"
/'
/'
/'
/'
/'
,/
.-1
--
,/
/' ,\~.
--
/'
/
/
".,
/
-'.
<
y
I'..i'l,l
""
"J ;i
)~,
ll:J
'.
r
I
r
~~G~~
"\I~' ..,
?
."..j.
'"
N
..
".,~J <to
+....1.
_ ~jM'
,'ll
.- -.-. ---
+'.;141
- Y')4 ~
~.,.
. .
"C. .' -. --
:J:
>-
IS
z
.....""1..
..~l . l
'.
.~('" H
- 9C: - -
+.'1l <.'1
...~ ,
j
+.." ~t
:.
1:
,
'"
o
z
.. ~'I .,
_ "00.
.. 'JY~ '..
.' -+tt: :"
.. ,~tl..~
.....,.111
.' ..,;;".~n--\.:)
!
I
I
_ _.4'~~.
. .
.. ~
III
~
..;
...
'"
~
<
"
'. . CS\; ''''. '
~~ -.10,. o,<~"~..
9,:,
,
,
+....: M
--'
..
t-
.,
!'
...
o
d
o
...
.....0<1...
.'
--
/
"
I
I
1
I
I .nol
-
''''' t'
~.
+.(.1
/
/
,
+~~f ~J
.
~.
......:..
- A14_
-----
"'oJ.-..
tn. Y.. -- -.~ .
367.00
/
1 ~ .
.....,-
400.01
',~'~ -:
5 89.12'07"( - -
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE:
December 17. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Discussion
Planning
~
v;J
ITEM NO.
Review 1997 Developers
Schedule/Projects
D
David L. Carlberg
Community Development Director
The City Council is asked to review and discuss the 1997 developers schedule as well as discuss and
give direction on the provision ofthe Development Policy Guideline requiring improvement
petitions/preliminary plats for urban plats of more than 20 lots to be approved by the Council on or
before December 31 of each year (Section 3, Subd. A.).
Developer's SchedulelProject Phasing
/
Attached for Council review is the table of developments agreed upon by developers at a meeting held
July 12, 1996. Please note that this table has not been approved by the City but is merely a guide for the
phasing of developments within the five year (1995-2000) Metropolitan Urban Service Area time frame.
Please also note the acreage estimates on the table do not accurately reflect what is being proposed for
each development The acreages listed on the table reflect the "buildable acres" as determined by the
developer as opposed to the gross acres of the plat The gross acreages have been determined with the
development and design of the preliminary plats.
The following developers met on Thursday, December 12, 1996, at the request of staff, to discuss the
table and the scheduling/phasing of developments. They are as follows:
Tony Emmerich - Emmerich Construction/Bunker LLC
Byron Westlund - Woodland Development Company
Don Jensen - Kenco Construction Co./Center Oaks
Bruce Waage - H&H, Inc.
Mike Quigley - Gorham Builders/Bunker LLC
Rossella Sonsteby - Rosella Realty
The following were invited and were unable to attend or did not attend the meeting:
Jerry Windschitl - Ashford Development Company
Gary Gorham - Gorham Builders/Bunker LLC
/
The following could not be reached:
Representative - Cambridge Capital, Inc.
,
/
The Council should note the following projects were slated for development in 1997 as agreed upon by
the developers at the initial meeting. Staff has included an explanation of the status of the projects.
Shadowbrook
The developer, Bunker LLC, received sketch plan approval May 2, 1995. Preliminary plat approval
was received one year later on May 7, 1996 consisting of 433 lots/units (260 acres), Shadowbrook
(phase I) final plat was approved by the City Council on August 6, 1996 and consists of 175 lots/units
(107 acres). The developer will be making final plat submittal for phase II which will consist of 258
lots/units (153 acres). Phase II ofthe project is on schedule for 1997 construction.
Note that the project was to be split into two phases of 86 and 105 "buildable" acres per phase in 1996
and 1997 respectively.
Timber Oaks Estates
The developer, Woodland Development Company, received preliminary plat approval from the City
Council on November 6, 1996. The project consists of 26 lots (16 acres) and is on schedule for
construction in 1997.
Crown Pointe East Second Addition
/
The developer is Ashford Development Corporation, Inc, The preliminary plat, consisting of 70 lots
(31 acres), has been reviewed and a public hearing has been held before the Planning and Zoning
Commission on November 26, 1996. The City Council was scheduled to review the preliminary plat on
December 17, 1996, however the developer and landowner have requested in writing (letter attached) the
item be placed on the January 21, 1996 Council agenda. Council needs to discuss/address the date for
the preliminary plat approval.
Woodland Estates
Woodland Development Company is the developer. The preliminary plat, consisting of 163 lots (77
acres), has been reviewed and a public hearing held by the Planning and Zoning Commission on
December 10, 1996. The Council is scheduled to review the preliminary plat on January 7,1996.
Note that the first phase was planned (35 acres) for 1997. Council needs to discuss/address the date for
the preliminary plat approval.
The developers also discussed allowing the project to be developed in its entirety in 1997. The 39 acres
indicated on the July 12, 1996 table would be moved from 1998 up to 1997 as shown on the December
12, 1996 phasing table. This change or modification is based on the assumption that the first phase of
Chesterton Commons (45 acres) would not develop in 1997,
j
Chesterton Commons
\
Ashford Development Corporation is the developer of the project The Council reviewed the sketch plan
on August 6,1996 which consisted of345 lots/units (183 acres). The preliminary plat was submitted to
the City for review on December 2,1996 and consists of219lots (104 acres). The Andover Review
Committee will meet on Tuesday, December 17, 1996 to discuss and comment on the preliminary plat
Council will review the preliminary plat sometime in 1997, however, the actual date of Council review
is unknown at this time. Council needs to discuss/address the date for preliminary plat approval.
/
The City has been informed by the developer that the north 60 acres of the property has been sold to
Cambridge Capital, Inc, As stated, staff was unable to reach this company to inform them of the
meeting with developers on Thursday, December 12, 1996.
Note that the project was to be split into three phases of 45 "buildable" acres per phase from 1997 to
1999.
Rosella's Property
The City has not received any development plans for this property/project Ms. Sonsteby indicated at
the December 12, 1996 meeting that this project will most likely occur in 1998.
Direction
Staff asks for direction at this time on the following:
I. The December 31 deadline for petitioned improvements of more than 20 lots for an urban
plat/preliminary plat approval.
2. Based on the above, the phasing of the projects for 1997.
J
-., ~
Development Phasing
\
12-Jul-96
Development 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Shadowbrook 85 105
Timber Oaks 16
Woodland Estates 35 39
Crown Pointe East 2nd 25
Chesterton 45 45 45
Rosella 10 35
Fharnam 35
Nova 7 7
Camp 9 9
W. Hills 4th 40
Sophie South 25
Nightingale Misc. 38
1011 220 1591 159
/
Page 1
Development Phasing
\
12-Dec-96
Development 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Shadowbrook 85 105 20
Timber Oaks 16
Woodland Estates 74
Crown Pointe East 2nd 25
Chesterton 45 45
Cambridge Capital 45
Rosella 10 35
Fharnam 35
Nova 7 7
Camp 9 9
W. Hills 4th 40
Sophie South 25
Nightingale Misc. 38
101 204 130 159 65
/
/
/
Page 1
'\
-'
ARTICLE I - ANNUAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Article is to establish an outline of the procedure to be employed
in the City of Andover for considering improvements originating either through petition,
or Council initiative. This Article also provides an outline of developer responsibility
and guarantees.
SECTION 2. INTENT
It is the intent of the Andover City Council to consider public improvements only once
during each calendar year, except as otherwise provided in this policy.
Subd. A. Justification
, I
1.} The location of Andover in the metropolitan area and the projected
growth patterns, will result in a change from a basically rural to an urban
character. It is necessary and advisable that this transaction occur in an
orderly process. An orderly process must be of prime concern to ensure
that proper planning, safety, financial consideration, citizen participation
and reorganization of change is accomplished and understood.
2.} This policy is not intended as a vehicle to impair growth and
development; rather it is to assure that the growth and development,
where it occurs, will be in an orderly manner utilizing proper planning
and sound fiscal management.
SECTION 3. PROCEDURE
Subd. A. Petitioned Improvements
1.} Petitions for streets, sewer, water and storm sewer, etc. must be
received by the City on or before December 31 of each year for an
urban plat consisting of 20 or more lots and on or before January 31 of
each year for an urban plat consisting of fewer than 20 lots. Petitions for
improvements in new subdivision will be accepted only if a preliminary
plat has been approved by the City Council with all conditions having
been met.
;'
2.} All petitioned public improvements must be presented to the Council on
or before the last regular Council meeting in December for urban plats
/
,
/
Subd. B.
2.)
consisting of 20 or more lots and January for urban plats consisting of
fewer than 20 lots of the year preceding the implementation of the
desired improvement. Upon receipt, the Council shall refer the petition
to the City Engineer for preliminary study and report.
3.) The City Engineer and/or Consulting Engineer shall prepare and submit
to the Council, a feasibility study and report on all proposed
improvements by the second regularly scheduled Council meeting in
January.
4.) Upon completion of the hearings, the Council will decide to order or to
abandon each proposed improvement. For those improvements
ordered, the Council shall:
a) Order preparation of final plans and specifications, approve them,
call for bids and may award contract(s).
b) Authorize Attorney to acquire all easements through
negotiations or condemnation.
c) Approve bond form, authorize and award sale of improvement
bonds. The Council may authorize sale at any time total
improvement cost estimates are known; however, delivery of bond
monies cannot be made until after improvement contracts are
executed.
Council Initiated Improvement Considerations
1.)
As part of its role, situations arise whereby the Council desires to
consider projects on its own initiative. Similarly, it is an administrative
responsibility to bring needed or visible improvements to the attention of
the City Council.
The procedure for this method of improvement origination and
consideration follows the same pattern as outlines for petitioned
improvements, except that the initial petition form is not required. In
place of the petition, either a member of the Councilor the
Administration presents a proposed resolution referring proposed
improvements to the City Engineer and/or Consulting Engineers to
prepare a feasibility report.
Subd. C. Non-Assessable Projects
)
1.) Non-assessable projects can generally be described as those which
provide a general benefit to the entire community rather than direct or
2
\
I
areal benefits to a specific portion of the City. Examples of such
improvements would be municipal wells, interceptor sewer lift stations,
water storage facilities, and water treatment facilities. Such
improvements are normally financed from funds dedicated for the
specific purposes intended.
2.)
Initiation. Non-assessable projects would typically be Council initiated,
as scheduled in the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program(CIP). Due
to the generally unique nature of these projects, combining as part of an
annual improvement program would serve no useful purpose,
3.)
Procedures. The procedures for implementation of a non-assessable
project shall be the same as those prescribed herein for Council initiated
projects, except that the schedule shall be as established by Council as
part of the CIP process.
4.)
Hearings. Public hearings are generally not required for those projects,
and will not be held unless specifically required for a given project.
SECTION 4. DEVELOPER RESPONSIBILITIES
Subd. A. Development Agreement
Thirty (30) days prior to ordering improvements for a proposed
subdivision or development, an agreement with the developer which
details the nature of the development, the schedule for implementation,
the role for the developer, the role of the City and other affected
agencies, and other items as may be deemed advisable by the City
Attorney shall be entered into by the City and developer. The
development agreement shall become effective at such time as the
Council orders the improvement(s). No improvement shall be ordered
without a mutual agreeable agreement in place.
Subd. B. Developer Guarantees
As stipulated in the development agreement, the Developer shall post
with the City surety(ies) in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, and in
amounts approved by the City Engineer for the following purposes:
1.) Developer's improvements (grading, lot staking, erosion control,
street lighting, etc.),
"-
)
2.) Assessments for Public Improvements:
a.) Street Grading and Drainage,
b.) Utilities (Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm Sewer),
3
,
c.) Street Construction (Concrete Curb and Gutter, Gravel Base and
Bituminous Pavement).
d.) Boulevard Restoration.
3.) Relocation and/or Protective Improvements for Non-Municipal
Utilities (Cash Deposit Only).
4.) Developer-Constructed Public Improvements if so approved by the
City.
SECTION 5. ENGINEERING OPTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The City Engineer shall have the option and be responsible for expanding petitions to
provide for continuity and rational extension of proposed improvements. Whenever
this occurs, it shall be brought to the attention of the Council in the feasibility study
and report. The Council shall then give consideration to altering the proposed
improvement from petitioned improvements to Council-Initiated.
In the interests of economy, the City Engineer shall combine like-type improvements
in developing the final plans and specifications to reduce improvement costs.
SECTION 6. IMPROVEMENT AHEAD OF SCHEDULE
/
The Council may give consideration to advancing developer financed improvements
subject to the following:
Subd. A. Applicant(s) shall state intention with the petition for improvement and
may include a request for waiver of hearing.
Subd. B. Council shall refer petition to the City Engineer for feasibility study and
report. and shall determine whether or not a public hearing is required or
warranted. If a public hearing is required or warranted, the City
Engineer shall indicate to Council how long the feasibility report will take.
and shall set the public hearing date accordingly. If there is no public
hearing. consideration will be given upon submission of the feasibility
study and report.
Subd, C. Council shall consider improvement proposal after receipt of feasibility
study and report. If Council approves the proposed improvement.
preparation of final plans and specifications will be ordered upon receipt
of a security deposit of one and one-half (1 %) times the City Engineer's
cost estimate to prepare the plans and specifications.
/
4
/
Subd. D. Council then shall approve final plans and specifications, order call for
bids, receive bids and award contract. Any easements necessary will be
so authorized for acquisition by the City Attorney.
SECTION 7. RURAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS
All new development located outside the MUSA will require to meet the Standard
Specifications for Rural Residential Street Construction.
The City shall not construct rural streets under public contract where a new
subdivision is being or has been created unless the benefiting property owners
petition the City and proceed as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota. The
City may, at its option, consider public contract construction of rural street
improvements where an unimproved rural road presently exists. This option shall be
exercised on a priority basis with rural roads having the potential to become routes of
collector classification or higher, given the highest priority. The second priority will be
given to other streets where the best interests of the general public are served.
SECTION 8. NON-MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
Where non-municipal utilities, such as pipelines and electrical lines cross a
subdivision, it shall be the responsibility of the developer to pay the costs necessary
for the relocation, realignment, and/or protection of such non-municipal utilities. The
developer will have the following option:
Subd. A. The developer may have the utilities relocated, realigned, and/or
protected by the appropriate utility company in advance of Council
ordering any public improvement project.
Approved by the City Council on November 16, 1993.
Revised: July 16, 1996
5
\
J
\
,
, /
PETITION:
Council Declare Adequacy, Order Report
Receive Report
Public Hearing Process
Plans and Specifications
Bidding Process
Award Bid
Construction
Total Time
Assessment Process
devpguid.doc
.-...... . ., ...... ".... -............
::}??:~:~~ttttJ::~::~~::~~~~:~t~~}::}\>):::>>/:(<{:::<t?>t:\:)}~
";:;:::;:;:::;:::::;:::::::::;:::::;:::;:::::;:::::::;:;:::;:::::;:::;:;:;:::;:>;:.;;:.:::;:::;:::::::.:::::::::;:::::::::::::::;:::::::;::::::
5 to 6 months
3 months
8 to 9 months
2 months
10 to 11 months
6
2-3 weeks
5 weeks
3 weeks
4 weeks
5 weeks
2 weeks
22 weeks
12 weeks
34 weeks
8 weeks
42 weeks
" /
i
,
,
I
l,
,
I
I
I
" ~CX1
~~~~~ l:; I
to' N!?!~ -..
I ;0 ill;o <0_:
I "" VI U1
__ ,. S.
----- ,""
.~-- .~\
':.'" ",'!"I......... "",,,~.
, ' ,., ~---- /,. ,
, ~ ' ~ : ,'M,' -:r " .
.....
rt
" ~
h <:l
:>; ~
"1 i:i
\
J
I.
~ \~
~.~
{'"
","i
~.)-: ...
q
I
"
\
J
I I
Fil'!'
G Xr':= I
'iI~Li
___ I
,I. ----~l
+- . I
I
,
.,:--,../
.
.~
.-
,~ g '~!r"'l :Eo
~-~ I~~~' )> mO
\h.\~l':., :D<
N N
0 .... cnm
0 0 <0 Z
0 <0 )> m:D
en 0 en Q ::0
.
N . . m :00
N N
0 0 0 en )> <0
.... !B
0 0 0 )> "3:
en 0 < c m"
i") c
m )>:D
.-:::-=r---- "'" m c
-----. ,"" --_11111111111 )> :om
------- ,"" OJ m:l:
_--r--=- ~~~~~ ~ )>m
N N -~
0 "tI 0 -
.... 0 c: z
en .... 0 en 3:<
. 0 OJ ~ -
N . C .m
0 N 0 !="
0
N .... - -
0 en Z :! cnr-
~ c 0)>
c: !:z
;:i ~
:oc:
m"
<~
m~
l5m
~
,\
I.'
I
"j
1--4.:
.,
\
{. "
L ~~.
., -
:JIll ....
i .\,
, .
4 . -'
I,.' ,...
'.'" "
.
~ .:;
,j
J
".'
0-
',.
-t
a;
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE:
December 17. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM NO.
Bill's Superette - Hanson Store
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
Community Development Director
Discussion
to.
The City Council at the November 19, 1996 meeting had indicated that the Council had an interest to
bring the development of Bill's Superette back for discussion. Staff received formal submittal of the
Commercial Site Plan Application on December 10, 1996 from Rademacher and Associates for the
development of the site. The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has scheduled a meeting to review the
plans at their December 23, 1996 meeting. If the Council would like to review the plans, staff can make
them available to the Council and/or schedule the item for the January 21, 1996 Council agenda, If not,
the Andover Review Committee will continue the standard review process.
,
,
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
, J
DATE: December 17.1996
AGENDA SECTION
Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson,cJ.L
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Discuss Public Hearing for Tree Preservation Ordinance
I.
At the December 3, 1996, City Council meeting the City Council reviewed the revised tree
preservation policy and made recommended changes. The requested revisions have been
incorporated into the policy. The next step is that the tree preservation requirements will be
included in a revision to Ordinance 29. The revision to this ordinance does not require that a
public hearing be held. A public hearing on this ordinance revision is not proposed to be held
unless the City Council deems it to be necessary.
\
, /
. )
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE: December 17,1996
AGENDA SECTION
Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Todd J. Haas, ~
Engineering~' .
ITEM NO.
Discuss "No Wake" Policy
I~I
The City Council has requested to discuss the possibility of creating a "No Wake Zone" along
the Rum River within City limits.
We have done some research on this issue for the City Council and this is what was found.
The City did hold a public hearing and passed a resolution (see attached) establishing erosion
controls and limiting the wake from boats and water skiing on the Lower Rum River and
establishing quiet water areas.
Unfortunately, this will be difficult to enforce because the City of Ramsey never passed a
resolution or ordinance. The resolution passed was sent to Anoka County for adoption but
/ was never approved. But to make the resolution effective, the City of Ramsey would need to
pass a resolution similar to Andover's resolution.
If the City Council is interested in still pursuing this issue, we would recommend the Andover
City Council request a meeting with the Ramsey City Council. If both sides agree that
something needs to be done then hold a public hearing as one forum for both cities or hold
separate hearings, one for each City.
If both sides agree after the hearings that an ordinance needs to be in place then both sides
will need to approve an ordinance.
Note: The City of Anoka has approved an ordinance within their limits regarding Rum River
Speed Restrictions. Attached is the ordinance, .
If you have any questions or need additional information, feel free to call me.
.. /
,
I
, J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R51-89
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO ESTABLISHING EROSION CONTROLS AND LIMITING
THE WAKE FROM BOATS AND WATERSKIING ON THE LOWER RUM RIVER AND
ESTABLISHING QUIET WATER AREAS.
WHEREAS, the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization
has been contacted by property owners living on the Lower Rum River
who are concerned by erosion of banks and shorelines abutting the
River; and
WHEREAS, boats creating a heavy wake have a negative effect on
the safety of people canoeing, swimming, or passively using the
River; and
WHEREAS, the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization
has contacted the County of Anoka which has indicated that the County
Board is willing to consider an ordinance limiting the wake of boats
using the river and prohibiting waterskiing and if the County Board
knows specifically what the Cities comprising the Lower Rum River
Watershed Management Organization want the County Board to adopt; and
WHEREAS, the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization
,has studied the issue and has recommended to this Council a draft of
/a model ordinance to be presented to the Anoka County Board for
adoption; and
WHEREAS, this Council has reviewed the proposed ordinance and the
provisions contained therein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover as follows:
1. The recommendations of the Lower Rum River Watershed
Management Organization for adoption of an ordinance establishing
erosion controls and limiting the wake from boats and waterskiing
behind boats operating on a portion of the Lower Rum River is deemed
to be in the best interests of the public.
2. The attached proposed ordinance is hereby returned as is to
the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization and the model
ordinance should be sent on to Anoka County for adoption. This City
Council approves the terms contained therein and agrees with the
necessity for adopting such an ordinance.
3. The area to be designated as a quiet water with the corporate
boundaries of the City of Andover is as follows:
From 149th Avenue NW to 181st Avenue NW
/
.,
) day of
Adopted by the city Council of the City of Andover this 7th
March
ATTEST:
&~u&
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
\
/
\
J
, 1989.
CITY OF ANDOVER
\ Regular City Council Meeting
) March 7.1989 - Minutes
Page 3
(The regular meeting recessed to conduct an HRA meeting; the Council
meeting reconvened at 7:57p.m.)
v
"NO-WAKE" ORDINANCE PUBLIC HEARING
Mr. Schrantz explained the Lower Rum River Management Organization is
proposing to have each of the City Councils hold pUblic hearings on
the recommended ordinance. They also want each of the cities to
recommend where they feel "No Wake" signing should be posted. He
stated there is an erosion problem in Anoka, thinking they will
recommend "No Wake" and "No Skiing" on the river within their city
limits. He didn't know whether Andover wanted to post everything or
Just specific sensitIve areas.
Bob Dillon - stated there are
changing around 159th Avenue.
skiing that far north.
several places where the water is
But it is very dangerous to be water
LeRoy Grandstrom - objected to the original proposal of limiting the
speed limit and motors to 5 horsepower. He didn't feei a boat wake
i would affect the river bank, as a river will choose its own course.
/
Mark Guoesbero. Andover Resident for 14 years - is a science
teacher with an aquatic biology background. He felt the appropriate
use for this river would dictate restricted speed and horsepower. He
stated there is some natural river erosion which happens seasonally
and cannot be prevented: but manmade causes are accelerated by boat
use. He owns a 30 hsp motor, and this ordinance would eliminate his
using it on the river. He aiso owns a canoe. He supported the
ordinance to restrict both speed and horsepower. Mr. Schrantz
explained the first proposal was to restrict speed and horsepower:
however. the ordinance before the Council now is to post "No Wake"
signs in the areas that are of concern or sensitivity.
Mr. Guoesbero - felt the entire river through Andover should be
posted "No Wake" because it is so unique. The appropriate use is
canoe. Obviously the nothern area doesn't need an ordinance to
protect it because it is so shallow. He did feel it would be
possible to operate a pontoon boat with a larger horsepower and not
create a wake.
Gordon Enoles. 5555 159th Avenue - agreed with Mr. Schrantz that the
posting should be only where there are wake problems, not along the
entire river. He stated most people are courteous on the river. He
felt Just posting "No Wake" is too vague. At the meeting in Ramsey,
\ another science teacher stated a no wake provision would have no
\ I effect on the river. Ramsey tabled the ordinance stating it is too
vague and unenforceable. and a majority of the residents at that
meeting were opposed to the ordinance. He felt Andover should leave it
up to the Engineer to decide which sensitive areas to post,
but not post the entire river.
Regular City Council Meeting
I March 7. 1989 - Minutes
Page 4
("No-Wake" Ordinance Public Hearing, Continued)
Lyle Bradley. 15202 Seventh - loves the Rum River feeling it Is a
very unique resource. There were at least 20 snowmobIles along the
river today, which doesn't hurt It at all. He's sklied on it both
wInter and summer; but he will no longer ski in the summer because the
river is too small and cannot handle motorboat traffic. He explaIned
how the shore soli Is dIssolved for as far out as 10 feet as a motor
boat passes by. This has a great effect on the bank over a periOd of
time. He read the results of research done on erosIon caused by
wakes, generally done by smaller vessels with high-speed motors. One
of the key problems Is the use of the small Jet skIs on the river. So
he was glad the prOblem Is beIng addressed.
Mr. Bradley also explained the State's "Adopt a RIver" program where
dIfferent groups wIll adopt sectIons of the Rum RIver to clean it and
plant some of the heavily eroded areas.
? - didn't have a problem restrictIng the Jet skIs or water
skIing. but she didn't care for the "No Wake" provIsIon thInkIng It Is
dIffIcult to enforce. She questioned who would make the determInation
on a wake and how It Is done.
Councllmember Knight agreed, asking how it Is enforced in other areas
where such a provision Is In force. Mayor Elling stated on lakes where
there are no wake provisions. the DNR enforces It; and the speed must
be very slow to get through those channels. Attorney Hawkins didn't
know the definitIon of a wake. Councilman Jacobson felt that a
common sense approach must be used to enforcIng the ordinance and that
no one should be harassed; only flagrant vIolations would be tagged.
Dick SzYPllnskl. 155th - stated the Jet skIs are the worst. There
hasn't been much activity with Jet skis or skiing thIs past year
because the river Is low, but there has been in past years. Those on
Jet skis very often are not very courteous and they create hugh wakes.
He also noted the weight on a pontoon or boat rather than the motor
size will determine the amount of wake.
Council discussion with several residents was on the prOblems caused
by Jet skis, feeling most of those users are not from the Immediate
cIties. They also discussed the enforcement of a "No Wake" provIsion
and whether .It should be posted only at sensitive areas or along the
entIre river In Andover. It was Indicated that both Andover and
Ramsey would need to agree In order for anything to be effective. Mr.
Schrantz stated the ordinance would eventually have to be passed by
Anoka County, and the enforcement would be done by Anoka County.
probably the Sheriff's Water Patrol.
/
Carl Christenson. 157th - stated by posting a "No Wake" zone, the
Jet ski problem would be eliminated.
Regular City Council Meeting
./ March 7, 1989 - Minutes
Page 5
("No-Wake" Ordinance Public Hearing. Continued)
Mr. Grandstrom - felt that erosion on the river is different from a
channel because as one side looses. the other side gains: it will not
go flat. Counclmember Jacobson felt that because there is nothing
to protect the river at this time. this ordinance should be approved
and the sensitive areas signed. If it is not solving the problem, the
Council can then consider something stronger.
? - stated if there is a no wake provision along the entire
river. it would take hours to travel up from Anoka to go fishing.
Others asked the definition of "minimum wake", concerned about how it
will be enforced.
Mr. Bradley stated they have a no wake policy on the St. Croix River.
and the DNR has stated it has worked very well. He also stated the Rum
River is much shallower now than it was at the years ago. Any erosion
on the river goes to the bank, some goes downstream, and some of it
ends up on the bottom: so the river is gradually getting shallower.
The soil in this area is so sensitive that it erodes very easily.
Another gentleman was concerned that the ordinance would not be
enforced. citing an incident where he felt there was poor response and
lack of action on the part of the Anoka County Sheriff's Department.
./
MOTION by Jacobson. Seconded by Knight, to approve the Resolution
relating to the estabalishing of erosion controls and limiting the
wake from boats and waterskiing on the lower Rum River and establish-
ing quiet water areas as presented: the area to be designated as a
quiet water shall be the entire length of the river within the
corporate boundaries of the City of Andover: and pass this resolution
on to the Anoka County Board for their consideration. (See Resolution
R051-89) DISCUSSION: Councilmember Orttel felt the testimony this
evening was for signing only the sensitive areas, not the entire
river. He asked Mr. Bradley If it would be reasonable to protect only
certain zones of the river, even If they had to be changed yearly, and
still leave other areas open for usage with a wake.
Mr. Bradlev - felt the areas can be Identified. He would not be as
concerned if it could be policed in some way, otherwise he felt some
will not pay any attention to the sign. He was skeptical.
Council discussed several options, including limiting the no wake
provision to the lower portion of the river in Andover to about County
Road 20. Above there. it is not feasible to water ski and it is above
the City park so Jet skis could not be put in the river at that point.
, \
/
Jerrv Herr. 157th - thought there must be other no wake ordinances
in the State or the DNR that the City could look at to determine a
definition for "No Wake". Council suggested if an a restriction is
enacted and it is not working, the residents should let the Council
know so further action can be taken.
)
Regular City Council Meeting
March 7, 1989 - Minutes
Page 6
("No-Wake" OrdInance PublIc Hearing, Continued)
Motion carrIed unanimously.
Councilmember Orttel also recommended asking the county that all
landings be posted. Council agreed to walt with the posting until the
County acts on an ordinance.
Public Hearing closed at 8:52 p.m.
ORDINANCE 10 AMENDMENT/PARK DEDICATION
\
J
Park Board Commissioner Ron Ferris explained the Park Board has
reviewed their recommendation and the Council/s proposal at the last
meeting. It is stili their opinion that $466 per lot Is reasonable,
showIng JustificatIon for It. He noted that based upon all the
transactIon of the past few years, the average park dedication per lot
is $464: so the number they are aIming for Is no different than the
present ordinance except it is a smoothing of the urban and rural
areas. Secondly, the reason less per lot is charged In the hIgher
denisty areas is because it is required that those areas have their
own park. So there is less usage of the parks from those areas.
Thirdly, Councilmember Orttel had thought the $466 dedication in the
rural area was too low since no further dedication can ever be
collected if the land is subdivided. But they are recommending the
dedication be $466 per lot or 10 percent of the fair market value,
whichever is higher. So if the per-lot dedication is too low, the 10
percent factor would be applied.
/
Attorney Hawkins reviewed the statutory framework that authorizes
cities to Impose these requirements on developers. For park
dedication, the City may choose an equivalent amount to the land
dedication based on the fair market value of the land no later than at
the time of final approval. It was his opinion that if land is not
desired. the City can require cash In the amount equivalent to the
amount of land given at the time of final approval. He dldn/t think
the per-dwelling unit cash dedication complies with the State Statute.
WIth the varying land values in Andover, he felt the per-dwelling unit
of cash park dedication is inequitable.
Mayor Elling stated at the last meeting the developers testified the
park dedication may be too low, but the proposed amount is too high.
Attorney Hawkins thought the value of land being used to determine
park dedication is too low. Mr. Ferris stated they have not been
able to determine what much of the land is worth. Attorney Hawkins
then suggested to determine the fair market value at the time of
\ approval. the Commission wIll have to go to an appraisal method.
/
(v) Emergency Orders. When nece..ary to protect the
public health, ..fety or ~elfarer tbB chief of
police i. authorized to ia.ae reasonable temporary
ordB~. concerning ~he uge of parks on matters not
gpecifically addr..sed in this Article or the
policie., procedure., rules, or regulation. adopted
hereunder by resolution.
violation of Section 24-2 (a) (b) (C) (d) (e) (9) (b)
(j) (k) (1) (m) (q) or (tl .ball be . petty misdemeanor,
and violation of Section 24-2 (f) (1) (n) (0) (p) (r) or
(u) ahall be a mi.demaanor under this code.
12/12/1995 10:45
"
/
612-421-8245
CITY OF ANOKA ENG
PAGE 01
section 24-2 (v)
section 24
Fees. To
~edurB., ,
polioi
in tll
by re
recoJIDS
Board.
facilities
ity council
r fol1QWing
n' Advisory
Section 24-4.
Rum River Sneed Restriction..
(al
p~o.e. pur.uant to Minnesota statutes 378.32
and 459.20 and Minn Rules Part. 6110.3000 through
6110.3800, it i. the purpo.e of the city of Anoka
to regulate th~ op.ration and sp.ed of watercraft
on the Rum River fram its confluence with the
Mississippi River upstream to the southern horder
of the City of RamlIey. The limitations contained
in this ordinance are designee to prevent and limit
the e~osion whicb i. occurring ~o the banks and
sahoreline of the R= River, within the city of
Anoka. The heavy wake froll waterakiinlJ r jet skiing
ana speedboat1ng create. WAve Action which i.
eroding the .bo:_line, bank., and bluff. along tbe
river, is adver.. to the public'8 interest in
maintaining and pre.erving the shoreline, an~
swimmers, people canoeing and other people using
the river more p..siv.ly are placed ift jeopardy by
waterskiing, jet skiing and speedboating. This
ordinance i. de.lqned to protect the health, safety
And general welfare of the public.
Sec. 24-2 added by Ord. 19~O-'8S5, Sec. 1, effective 3-9-90.
Sec. 24-2 amended by Ord. 1991-'883, Sec. 1, effective
5-24-91.
Sec. 24-3 added by Ord. 1990-'863, Sea. 1, 8ffe~ive 6-8-90.
Sec. 24-3 ~end.d by Ord. 1991-1885, Sec. 1, effective
5-24-91.
Sec. 24-4 renumbered (formerly Sec. 24-3) by Ord. 1991-'885,
Sec. 3, etfective 5-24-91.
,
, /
12/12/1995 10:45
512-421-8245
PAGE 02
.
(b)
CITY OF ANOKA ENG
Section 24-4 (b)
Definition.. ~he tollOwUl9 warda AIld phr.se. when
uBed in this ordinance have the meanings let forth
below.
)
(1) .per.on" includes an individual, partner.hip,
corporation or any boc!y of persons, whet.her
incorporated or formed into an Association or
not.
(2) .Operate" mean. to navigate or otherwise use a
watercraft.
(3) "Watercraft" is defined in M.S. 361.02, subd.
7.
.Slow-no wak.- meanll the operation of a water-
craft at the .lowelt po..ible .peed nece.sary
to =aintain ateerage and in no c..e greater
than 5 mph.
. RWII. River" 1II8aDS the body of water located. in
the City of Anoka from its confluence with the
Missis.ippi 1U.ver upstream to tho 1\lLlDIIay city
11JDit..
(c) Raqulation. No person shall operate a watercraft
at greater than. a slow-no wake speed on the RWIl
River fram its contluence with the Mississippi
River upatreUl to the 1\amaey city liJDita. Any
per.on who .hal.l violate this provision shall 1Je
Quilty of a petty misdemeanor.
(4)
(5)
"''''SO n-wcl
~ ra. vJ.R.
,Jk0,LP-t
-fV" .'0 ~-"~,
lctk ~4P. /1'"
~v-".~ ~ (fl
(d) Exetnl)tions.
(1) Authorized r..ource management, emergen~ and
enforcement peraannel, when acting in the
performance of their du~i-., .hall be exempt
from the provision. of this ordinance.
( 2) 'l'emporary ex.mptionl from. th1s ordinance m4Y ba
granted by 1:.11e Chief of polioe.
Marunq. The city of Anoka police Department
shall be re.pon.ible for info~ng the public,
posting notification at all public Bece.... and
marking or buoyiDg o.r00.8 a.ffected by this ordinance
&S neces8ary to.9ive reasonable notice of the .peed
reatrietion of this .ection.
<e)
\
'- }
Enforcement. 'the city of ADoka }Ialice Department,
the Anoka County Sheriff'a Department and other
lioon..d peace officers, including Con.ervatian
Officers of the Department of Batural Resources of
the State of H1~esota are authorized to enforce
this ordinanoe.
2'-4 renumbered (fo~rly Sec. 24-3) by Ord. 1991-1885,
Sec. 1, effective 5-26-91.
S_c.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
"
/
DATE: December 17.1996
AGENDA SECTION
Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson~t
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Discuss RequesUGOR-EM, LLCI
Additional Building Permits/Shadowbrook
q.
The City Council has been requested by GOR-EM, LLC, to allow the issuance of building
permits for Lots 2 thru 11 of Block 4, Lots 4 thru 21 of Block 5, Lots 2 thru 7 of Block 6, Lots 1
thru 10 of Block 7, Lots 1 thru 9 of Block 8, Lots 1 & 2 of Block 9, and Lots 7 thru 12 of Block
10, of the Shadowbrook development.
Shadowbrook can currently receive up to 72 building permits as the streets, watermain,
sanitary sewer, and storm sewer have been installed, inspected and tested for these lots.
Per the development contract, building permits can not be issued until the asphalt has been
installed on the streets or a separate service road is constructed to access the lots (see
,.J attached reference from the development contract). As the Council is aware, the development
policy was recently updated to allow for some building permits to be issued within a
development but to restrict their number and location so the City utility contractor can
complete their work in a orderly and timely fashion. This also increases the quality of the City
improvements as it eliminates the traffic and damage that can be caused by the building
activity in the areas where the City improvements are being installed.
Also, the City contract was not set up to have the streets and utilities completed at the
locations being requested. (The extent of the areas to be completed and ready this year,
1996, were worked out with the developers at the time of the development of the project
specifications.) In addition to the streets not being paved in these areas, the water and sewer
mains have not been tested or the final work completed on them. This would need to be
completed.
1
j
GOR-EM, LLC
10732 Hanson Blvd. NW.
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
; Mike Quigley
Director of Developement
Tel (612) 767-3965
Fax (612) 755-1117
R~::: ~ .~-. .~ -
~lEt
1 n .'one:
~_ : I..... '::1 { .-,
December 6, 1996
CITy,.:, -'.
Honorable Mayor
City Council
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
We are requesting the issuance of building permits for Lots 2 thru II of Block 4, Lots 4
thru 21 of Block 5, Lots 2 thru 7 of Block 6, Lots 1 thru 10 of Block 7, Lots 1 thru 9 of
Block 8, Lots 1& 2 of Block 9, and Lots 7 thru 12 of block 10, of Shadow brook.
,
I
/
These lots are served by utilities but the street is not blacktopped at this time. We assume
responsibility for the plowing of the streets serving these lots and the repair of any
resulting damage due to plowing or home construction until the streets have been
surfaced.
It is understood that this request does not include the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
Thank you for your consideration.
A:d~
:/ .
/./;/:~ 7' '/-
Mike Quigley.-Y' ,./
Bunker, LLC.
.'
j
,\/~
(J. "(f' 0&:\ . 6.
. ,/ -\,r"-
I t r:/'
the City Building Official may issue building permits for up to a maximum of 15% of
r
.
BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY.
,
Where a platted street intersects an existing publicly maintained road,
the lots within the development for lots contiguous within the intersection. The 15%
of the lots can be separated to multiple intersection locations or established at one
location. The Developer shall construct a service road to provide access to these lots
as required by the City._ The Developer shall submit a plan to the City for approval
identifying the location of the proposed access roads and the lots being requested for
building permits. Building permits an be requested for the remaining 85% of the lots
within the development after the first lift of the asphalt has been installed on the
street.
The City building official will issue a cease and desist order for violation of silt
fencing, erosion control and tree protection.
7. CLEANUP. Developer shall promptly clean dirt and debris from
streets that has resulted from construction by the Developer, its agents or assigns.
8. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work
and construction required by this contract and acceptance by the City, the
improvements lying within the public easements shall become City property without
further notice or action.
9. INSURANCE. Developer and/or all its subcontractors shall take
out and maintain until one (1) year after the City has accepted the private
"
improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury,
including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the
J
Developer's work or the work of his subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly
11
J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
.'
DATE: December 17,1996
AGENDA SECTION
Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson, ~ <-
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Present FindingslWinslow Hills 2nd Addn.lCalculations
10,
At the December 3, 1996, City Council meeting the City Council directed staff to calculate the
area below the 100 year ponding elevation for the Winslow Hills 2nd Addition development.
The Engineering Department utilized a planimeter measuring devise to calculate the area
which exists below the 100 year flood elevation. The area was measured from the grading
plan designed by the developer's engineers. The attached table provides a comparison of
these areas as identified by three separate sources: TKDA, Winslow Holasek (from
information provided by his surveyor Hyland Surveying), City of Andover Engineering
Department.
\
As you will note under the column labeled "Area Below 100 yr. Ponding Elev. (City
Engineering Department)" the total area below the 100 year ponding elevation that was
identified on the developers grading plan is approximately 2.81 acres. There is also a low
area adjacent to Lots 2 & 3 of Block 6, which was not identified on this grading plan which has
an area below the 100 year elevation. This area amounts to approximately .2 acres for a total
area of 3.01 acres. Mr. Holasek's calculations identify an additional .4 acres which is not
identified on the grading plan.
'. /
A copy of the attached assessment worksheet indicates that the ponding areas were not
deducted from the area charges for Winslow Hills 2nd Addition.
ITEMS OF CONSIDERATION
'.
1. The City followed the legal assessment process (State Statute 429) to assess the costs to
the development
/
2. The developers received the assessment information to review with their engineers prior to
adoption of the assessment role.
3. A public hearing was waived for the project by the developers.
4. If the Council adopted a policy of reimbursement for inconsistencies in assessed projects,
how far back would we go?
5. If an inconsistency is found in the benefit of the City, would the developer be required to
reimburse the City?
6, If a reimbursement were made, would it be made to the developer or the individual who
purchased the lot?
\ j
/
..'.....'.....'.......'.....'.........'...'.....'.........'............
.....................................................................
..-,.-.................................
3m
.0
\
)
~~~~<(.~
N-.:tO .....
~~~~~
..... .....N
II II II II
<(cooo
"0 "0 "0 "0
e e e e
o 0 0 0
a.. a.. a.. a..
()
<(
-.:t
('I)
o
~ ~
III III
.e e
() .- .-
<( .5 ---..5 ---.
N~ro~~ro
It:! a. a. a.a.
~ E E
o 0
..... .....
l.L. l.L.
- -
en
/
"0
e
N
en
I
$:
o .
en e
e"O
.- "0
$<(
~j
en
-.....
"Owe
o w a...!!1
1Il.....!Eoa..
~ccw>C>
<(ww e
() "0 W .-
". 1Il'- 0"0
:> ......"...... CO
o "0<( 0 e ,'n
...J e 0 ~
() . .
<(()()
<(<(
0"'.....
. U"lN
('I) . ,
('I)
U
<(
('I)
.....
'U
.:i,<(
('I)-.:t
"'~
.-.:t
II II II II
<(CO 0 (!)
"0 "0 CO "0 t::'"O
eeoeoe
000000
a.. a.. - a.. - a..
U
<(
-.:t
co
-.:t
U
<(
-.:t
CO
-.:t
~
III
e
.E
0.-_
<(wro
.....-
..... a. a.
('I)E
o
.....
l.L.
-
'E
('I)
en
I
$:
o .
en e
e"O
.- "0
$<(
"0 ~ ---.
e-o~
IIlIll.....W
m-()"Oen
'" I>- C> W III
. e"O 0
~ E ":;.":; I
o w 0 "
U: ~ a.~
_::l
C/)
-
Winslow Hills Properties
-
oa4--
Winslow Holasek: 434-5812
/ Gary M. Gorham: 421-0998
September 9, 1993
RECEIVED
Hr. Todd Haas
Assistant City EnGineer
Andover City Hall
1685 Crosstown Blvd. m~
Andover, HN 55304
SEP 1 0 1993
CITY OF ANDOVER
Her \Hnslow Hills 2nd Addition
Dear Hr. Haas:
Please be advised that on behalf of Winslow Hills Properties, we
are in agreement with the assessment and hereby waive all rights
we might have to a hearing on this assessment pursuant to llinnesota
Statutes Annotated, Chapter 429.
'.
If you should need any further information, please do not hesitate
to contact me. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
"
Sincerely,
WINSLOW HILLS FHOPEl\TlES
d .1'.. ,<j J
~~-"J- /" ;; 'ry":7'.,(,rF-"";
Gary 11. Gorham
.'
'.
J
~.'.
..
.
/P/;?7 ~
IJ~I
11;/.
ANDOVER SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
, /
PROJECT NAME Winslow Hills 2nd Addition
PROJECT NO.:
92-4
FEASIBILITY STUDY: Date Aoril 21. 1992
Amount $ 630.462.00
CONTRACT AWARD: Date June 16. 1992
Amount $ 528.229 36
FINAL CONTRACT COST
$ 543.41489
Engineering:
Aerial Mapping (1% of street)
Drainage Plan (0.3% of street/storm)
Administration (3%)
Assessing (1%) rnvoice
Bonding (0.5%)
Legal & Easement
Advertising
Other: Public WorKs
Construction Interest (4.0%)
From 6/92 to 9/93 Months:
$ 102.824.67
$ 1.164.38
$ 6.958 62
$ 16.302 45
$ 5.434 15
$ 2.717 07
$ 566 50
$ 242.56
$ 638 62
$ 27.170 74
15
TOTAL EXPENSES (% of Final Contract Cost = 1.301832)
+ $ 164.019.76
TOTAL CONDEMNATION COSTS
+ $
N/A
Trunk Source and Storacre:
$
.~ TOTAL PROJECT COST
Watermain: Connection Charge $
Area Charge $
Lateral Charge $
Sanitary Sewer: Connection Charge $ 15.399 00
Area Charge $ 28.737 00
Lateral Charge $
Storm Sewer: Area Charge $ 54.014 40
(--..fi.lL Uni t
31 0 Acres
(_LF
(--..fi.lLUnits
(.3..l......O.-Acres
(_LF
(31 0 Acres
@ $1. 070
@ $ 988
@ $
@ $256.65
@ $927.00
@ $ )
@ $1. 742 40)
TOTAL TRUNK SOURCE AND STORAGE
+$ 192.978 40
City Share:
$16.275.58 x 1.301832
-$ . 21.188.02- ..-
Work Previously Done:
N/A
$
Subtotal
$ 171. 790 33
TOTAL TO BE ASSESSED
$ 879.224.98
Current Assessment per Lot:
$879.224 98
60 Lots
$14,653.75
"
,
ft.,....
-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
, )
DATE: December 17.1996
AGENDA SECTION
Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson,~t
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Accept Feasibility ReporUOrder Plans &
Specs/95-12/Well #6
II.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting the feasibility study,
ordering improvement and directing preparation of plans and specifications for the
improvement of Project 95-12, Well #6.
As the City Council may recall, the proposed site is the previous location of one of Andover's
original school houses. The lot is currently vacant and the school house was relocated to the
Anoka County fairgrounds for its historical benefit a number of years ago, As the site has
some historic value to the City, we have discussed the possibility of designing the well house
/ (Phase II) architecturally to resemble the old school house. We can maintain the same
functionality of a well house and at the same time preserve some of the past history of the
City.
,
If the City Council is interested in seeing this occur, we can incorporate it into the Phase II
design of this project. (Phase I is the drilling and development of the well.)
,
)
, /
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO,
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
J
,
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 95-12 FOR WELL #6.
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 18th day of July, 19 95, order the
preparation of a feasibility study for the improvement; and
WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by TKDA and presented
to the Council on the 17th day of December ,19~; and
WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a Public Hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and declares the
improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of $ 482 500.00 .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby receive the feasibility report with an estimated total cost of
improvements of $ 482.500.00 . waive the Public Hearing and order improvements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the firm of_
TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such improvement project.
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
,
,
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
\
)
DATE: December 17.1996
AGENDA SECTION
Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson'~1
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Accept Feasibility Report/Order Plans & Specs!
96-26fTrunk S. Sewer & WMlWoodland Estates
18,
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting feasibility study, waiving
public hearing, ordering improvement and directing preparation of plans and specifications for
the improvement of Project 96-26 for trunk sanitary sewer and watermain in the area of the S
% of SW % of Section 22 (Woodland Estates).
The funding for this project will be from the City Trunk Water and Trunk Sewer funds.
)
..,
'. J
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO, 96-26 FOR TRUNK SANITARY
SEWER AND WATERMAIN IN THE FOllOWING AREA S Y2 OF SW Y4 OF SECTION
22 (WOODLAND ESTATES).
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 6th day of November ,1996,
order the preparation of a feasibility study for the improvement; and
WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by TKDA and presented
to the Council on the 17th day of December ,19~; and
WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a Public Hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and declares the
improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of $407.550.00 .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby receive the feasibility report with an estimated total cost of
improvements of $407,550,00, waive the Public Hearing and order improvements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the firm of_
TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such improvement project.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
City Council at a regular meeting this 17th
Council members
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
and adopted by the
day of December ,19~, with
voting
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J,E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
, J
DATE:
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Funding - 1997 Calendar
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR
AGE~
BY:
Recycling
ITEM
NO,
\5
Cindy DeRuyter, c.:~~
Recycling Coordinator
A 32 page community calendar is in progress to be given to each Andover residents.
Information from each city department has been requested. This is so that the
residents can understand the workings of their city. Also, Fire and Police
information and youth program information is included. Pictures from residents
have been submitted to depict varying aspects of our city.
)
The calendar, costing about $ 8,000.00, will be funded by Recycling and other
departments.
A request is made for additional funds to be paid from the general fund contingency.
'. /
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
J
/
DATE:
December 1 7. 1 996
AGENDA SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Discussion
ITEM NO.
Non-conforming Home Occupations
Planning D
David L. Carlberg Z
Community Development Director
~q,
The City Council is asked to give direction to staff on how to proceed with the non-conforming home
occupation provisions in Ordinance No.8, Section 4.30, Home Occupations. The City Council on
December 4, 1996, directed staff to not enforce the provisions related to non-conforming home
occupations until Council either determines the changes that need to be made or are made to the
ordinance. The discussion did include the possibility of establishing a resident committee to review that
portion of the ordinance and make recommendations.
Staff asks for direction at this time.
'_/
'\
'. _/
')
/
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 4, 1996
MINUTES
A Special Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by
Mayor Jack McKelvey on December 4, 1996. 8:00 p.m., at Oak View Middle
School, 15400 Hanson Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota.
Councilmembers present:
Councilmembers absent:
Also present:
Dehn, Jacobson, Knight, Kunza
None
City Attorney, William G. Hawkins
Building Official, David Almgren
City Code Enforcement, Jeff Johnson
Fire Chief, Dan Winkel
Community Development Director, Dave Carlberg
City Administrator, Richard Fursman
Others
DISCUSSION ON NONCONFORMING BUSINESS ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
Mayor McKelvey explained the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the
first application for a Special Use Permit under the new ordinance.
,amendment regarding nonconforming businesses which began operating in
)the City prior to 1990. He stated he was very upset with what happened
.... at that meeting and over some of the things done by Staff. At the.
Commission meeting, there was talk about a full inspection for building
codes and fire codes, which was not anticipated. He did not feel that
was the intent of the Council when the ordinance was passed. The Mayor
stated many other businesses are watching to see what happens with this
one. They feel the City wants to get rid of them; and if this first
application is not approved, he predicted none of the other
nonconforming businesses will come forward to apply for the Special Use
Permit. Then all of the Council's efforts will have been wasted.
Mr. Carlberg stated the Planning Commission brought up the issue of
building and fire codes relating to nonconforming home occupations going
through the Special Use Permit process and were disappointed that the
Building Official and Fire Marshal had not inspected the Cardinal Auto
Body shop prior to the meeting. The issue of building and fire codes
was not discussed by the Council when the ordinance was amended. Staff
is looking for direction on that issue.
Councilmember Jacobson felt the ordinance is clear that all building
codes must be met and that life safety issues must be addressed. He
felt the ordinance clearly states that inspections must be done
regarding building and fire codes issues. Mayor McKelvey stated at the
Planning Commission meeting the Building Official stated this home
business would have to comply to all commercial building codes. If that
jis the case, Mr. Cardinal will be put out of business and the City might
as well stop wasting its time with any of the other nonconforming home
occupations. And which codes will be used since this particular business
was started in 1983?
,
I
Special Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - December 4, 1996
Page 2
"\
J
(Discussion on Nonconforming Business Ordinance Amendment, Continued)
Councilmember Dehn felt the ordinance is very discriminatory against
blue collar workers, as there are many more restrictions for those types
of home businesses and little against the white collar type home
businesses. Attorney Hawkins stated the City is obligated to enforce
the codes uniformly and on those businesses coming in under the permit
process in the same manner as those legally established. If the City
has knowledge of a dangerous condition, it cannot ignore that. If Staff
knows of a violation of the codes, then they must take action. The Fire
Chief has to perform the same inspections for these permit applications
as he does for everyone else. The standards in effect at the time the
business was created are the ones that are applied. He used the example
of Councilmember Kunza's operation. Because the City knew about the
business in the zoning for many years, it is very difficult to close it
down based on zoning. However, if there is a life safety issue on that
premises and the City is aware of it, the City has an obligation to act
and to enforce the code.
Chief Winkel stated once they are advised of a problem, they are
obligated to enforce the fire code. There is no variance from it. They
will discuss the appropriate changes with the property owner and work
with them to bring the premises into compliance in a reasonable manner.
The intent is to be user friendly to get them into compliance, not to
)put the people out of business. Even if these nonconforming businesses
~ do not make application to the City, if the Fire Department is aware of
a problem, they are obligated to do an inspection.
Considerable discussion ensued on what should be required of those
nonconforming home occupations making permit applications, on the
liability issue and the need for the City to do inspections and enforce
the code when a known life safety issue exists, and on the concern that
some of the nonconforming businesses would be forced to stop operating
because they will not be able to meet all of the building and fire
codes. Most of the Council felt that common sense and reason has to
rule and that the attitude should be to work with the business owners to
try to make it work rather than to try to get them out of business.
There were differences of opinion as to how much should be investigated
prior to the permit application coming before the Planning Commission
and Council.
Mayor McKelvey stated Mr. Cardinal did withdraw his request for a
Special Use Permit, and he will be asking for a refund of the fees paid.
The Mayor was not happy with the way Mr. Cardinal's permit application
was handled by Staff and was concerned that others will not apply out of
fear that they will be put out of business by having to meet all
building and fire codes. He suggested a committee of residents be
formed to review the ordinance for nonconforming home occupations and to
make recommendations for changes. The committee should include residents
\who have permits or who are legally operating home occupations.
, )
Special Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - December 4, 1996
Page 3
)
(Discussion on Nonconforming Business Ordinance Amendment, Continued)
Councilmember Dehn suggested a guide sheet be composed to be given to
anyone who makes application for a permit for a nonconforming home
occupation. The guide sheet would be user friendly and would spell out
the goals and specific steps that will be taken. She felt that
compromise and communication are needed but are often lacking.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by McKelvey, that the City Council
authorize Staff to not enforce Ordinance No.8, Section 4.30 (D),
Nonconforming Occupations, Pages 4-7 dealing with nonconforming home
occupations; do not enforce that section of the ordinance until the
Council either determines the changes that need to be made or are made
to the ordinance. The first part of the ordinance would be preserved
and enforced. DISCUSSION: The Junkers have made application for a
permit for a nonconforming home occupation and the discussion was on
whether or not that request should go through the process. After some
discussion, the Junkers agreed to keep their request on hold until the
issues with the ordinance are resolved. While there was some sentiment
to forming a resident committee to review that portion of the ordinance
and make recommendations, no specific direction was given this evening.
Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-No (Jacobson as he felt the ordinance says
the proper things, that Staff 's motives are proper and that the
ordinance shouldn't be changed to make it easier to get a permit) vote.
--'
MOTION by Kunza, Seconded by Dehn, to adj ourn.
unanimously.
Motion carried
The meeting adjourned at 9:22 p.m.
Respectful~<Sub~.
'\\\ ~ Cc~ E~l_
Ma~~lla A. Peach
Recording Secretary
J
)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 8RRRR
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, THE ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF AL~DOVER
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains:
Ordinance No.8 is hereby amended as follows:
4.30 Home Occupations
(A) Intent:
Planning principles protect the public interest in part by avoiding land use conflicts. One
such conflict involves differences between commercial and residential activities. This
confrontation has commonly been resolved by relegating commercial activities to
commercial zoning districts. However, some limited commercial activities have been
allowed in residential areas, and have had no negative impact.
The purposes of this Section are to:
"
I) allow such limited passive commercial uses as would not detract from the
character and integrity of residential neighborhoods;
2) identify conditions under which such uses may be permitted, and
3) continue to require all other commercial uses to be located only in commercial
zoning districts.
(B) General Provisions
Home e€el:lpatiea uses may iaellide offiee uses, repair serviees, photo or art srndia,
elressmakiIlg, or teaduBg limited to three (3) students at 1Hfj' eee time and similar ases.
S1:l.eh heme eeeupatiofl5 are saejeet to the f-ollewiag eeadhieas:
All home occupations which conform to the followini standards may be conducted in a
residential zoned district without a Special Use Permit:
I) The number of employees shall be limited to one (I) person on site in addition
to family members.
)
I
\
/
2) The area within the principle structure used by the home occupation shall not
exceed twenty (20%) percent of the dwelling's livable floor area. Basements
may be included if they meet all Uniform Building Code requirements for
ingress and egress.
(
3) On-site sales shall be prohibited. except those clearly incidental to services
provided in the dwelling.
4) Any interior or exterior alterations of a dwelling for a home occupation shall
be prohibited. except those customarily found in a dwelling.
5) Vehicles associated 'With a home occupation shall be limited to one (1)
vehicle on the premises and as stated in Section 8.08.
6) Unusual parking and traffic patterns shall not be created, which are not
normally found in the neighborhood, and in no case, shall the need for
more than three (3) additional vehicles be created on the property.
7) Signs shall be regulated as set out in Section 8.07.
\
8) Home occupation uses mav include office uses. repair services. photo or art
studio. dressmakini cabinet makin~/wood workinl: or teachin~ services
limited to three (3) students at anyone time or similar uses.
/
8) .\ Speeial Use Peffilit shall be reql::lirea fer any heme escuI3atien that is lecatea
in an aCcessery structui'e and/or that reEt1::1H-es e~Herisr storage. These Reme
eccl::lpatiens shall be subjest te the fellewing eORditioas:
9) In aetiBg 12flea aa =Ilplieati011 fer 8peeial Use Peanit, the City shall eeasider:
a. The effeet ef the prepesea use upell the health, safety aBa geneFal welfare
efthe Cit;,. illShiaiRg Ol::lt net limite a te the facters e[nsise, glare, eaer,
eleetrical mterf.zrenees, vibratien, al:i5t ana ether 11l:lisaRces; fire ana safety
B~arc:l.s; e~cistiE:g and anticipated traffie sCJRaitiolls; and parlci:eg [aeilities eft
adjaccllt stree5 and laBa.
b. The effect ell sl::lITeundin;; properties, iReh:iaing ....a!uatien, aestheties and
seems vie'.\"s, land uses, charaeter ana iRtegrit;,. e[me neigboorheea.
s. Censiztcaey 'Aim the .\naever CempreheRsive Plan ana DevclepmeRt
Framewerk.
a. The impa.:t on ;;oyemmental fadlities aRa ser;iccs, including roads, sanitary
sewer. water, and poli.:e and fire.
\
)
\.
2
e. The effeet aa seasiti...e eaviraR:ffieatal features iaelusiag laI(es, sW'faee aae
uasergral:lfls water sl::Iflflly aas Elliality, 'Netlanss, slape:>, geed fllaias lHlS
seils; aas ether [aeters as [aliRs releYaRt by the City.
)
I Q) THe Speeial Use Peffilit is ';alia fer ene (1) year trem the eate ef iS$\:Iaaee
lHlless etherv;ise speeifies ia the Reseh:ltiea fur apflrayal aae thereafter shall
ee al:itomatieally reaewea <:aeh y<:ar \:Hlless ebjeetieas ar e:emplaiRts are
reeei';ea fram aeigheenn; flroperty eV.Rers, the City Ca1..l:Beil ar City staff and
a reElllest fur revie.^' is made.
(C) Iaspeetioa ana Re...ae:atiOR
I) The City may at any time inspeet the Heme Oee1:ipatiaa te seteffiline if the
aflfllieant is strietly aehena; ta the Speeial Use Permit aRa the eeaaitians
thereaf. If it is fal::l8d that the permit aaa the eaRditians af the permit are Rat
beiRg adheres te, the aflfllieaat shall ee Ratifies ia v:ntiRg by the City and
gh'en ten (1 Q) Sllj's ta seme inte striet eeffifllianee. If semflliaase is nat
aehieves after that ten (10) sllj' penea, the Ci~' Caaaeil shall hald a p1:Hllie
heariag ta sSR5iaer the matter ana may revske the Sfleeial Use PeRBit.
(C) Home Occupations Located in an Accessory Structure or ReQuirini Exterior Stora2e
"
/
A Special Use Pennit shall be required for any home occupation that is located in
an accessory structure and/or requires exterior storage. These home occupations
shall be subject to the following conditions:
1) The size of the lot or ~ ofland shall be three (3 a.) acres or larger.
:!) The speeitie leeatiaa aaa size sf an aeeessery sffiis~e ane/er a~iele stemge
area shall Be as alle.....ea by the City.
2) The combined square footage of the accessory structure and/or outside storage
area utilized bv the home occupation shall not exceed eight hundred (800 s.f.)
square feet.
3) Setbacks of the accessory building and outside storage area shall be ofa
magnitude found necessary by the City, but in no case shall it be less than one
hundred (100) feet front yard setback, thirty (30) feet side yard setback and
fifty (50) feet rear yard setback or as required in Section 6.02.
4) The outside storage area and all vehicles, materials and equipment being stored
~ on-site shall be fenced, landscaped and screened in such a manner as to
prevent it from being visible at any time of the year from road right-of-ways,
public propenies and surrounding propenies.
,
J
3
5) All provisions in Section 430(8).
D)
Vesteel Rights:
(
J
}orEl Heme Occl:IflatieR allElweel ey the Special Use Permit shall cElafer l:iJlea any
flerSOR Elr te the eeRefit Elf an:- flropert:: an)" vested rigHt te that use, rather the l:Ise
shall remaiR sl:leject te all cClRelitiElRS Elf the pefffiit as estaeli5he~ BY the City_ The
City ma:: fiad it Recessary frem time te time te reyiew the eeReitieRs efthe
permit as they rzlate te the prEltectiElR afthe geReral v;elfare efthe eammWlity.
(D) Non-ConforminQ Home Occupations
All residents that are conducting a home occupation or business that do not
conform to the standards contained in Section 4.30(B) and (C) and h;ve
conducted such business at their residence in the Ci~ prior to May 15. 1990 must
make application for a Special Use Permit. but may c~ntinue to conduct su~h
business pending final determination of their application. Should the citr
Council deny the Special Use Permit request. all such persons shall i~;diately
cease their business activities from such residential premises or complv wiiliili;
provisions in Section 4 30(8) and (C).
These home occupations are subiect to the followin~ conditions:
./
1) The applicant shall demonstrate proof that they have conducted
business at their current address or residence prior to Mav 15 1990
2) A.n on-site inspection will be conducted by City staff with the cooperation of
the property OMler conducting the home occupation The inspection sh~II ~
conducted ten (I Q) days prior to the public hearin2
The inspection bv staff will document the following conditions on-site that are
associated with the home occupation.
a) Number of emplovees
b) Number and types ofvehic1es. along with their respective V'oss vehicle
weii'hts
c) An inventorY of all equipment and machineIY
d) Location and area within the principle structure and accessory buildin2s
utilized bv the home occupation.
e) Location and size of exterior stora2e
f) Hours of operation
~) Life safety issues
h) Anv other relevant activitv or issues.
)
4
J
Upon completion of the inspection staff will prepare and present to the
Planninl: and Zoninl: Commission and City Council a detailed report of the
home occupation that describes the conditions as stated above pursuant to the
procedures established in Section ".03 Special Uses and General Statement.
These conditions will be outlined in the Special Use Permit If the Special Use
Permit is approved bv the Citv Council the conditions as stated must be
adhered to and cannot be increased or enlarged. The home occupation shall not
increase in extent. number volume or scope from anv of these conditions or the
Speciall Tse Permit will be subiect to revocation.
All home occupations which were conducted bv residents after Mav 15, 1990
are required to complv with the provision in Section 4.30(B) and (Ct
(E) Special Use Permits and Provisions
1) Special Use Permits l:ranted bv Section 4.30(C) shall follow the criteria
established in Section 5 03 Special Uses General Statement. These permits
shall be valid one (I) vear from the date of issuance unless otherwise specified
in the Resolution for approval and thereafter shall be automaticallv renewed
each vear unless obiections or complaints are received within a one (1) year
period from anv three (3) residents within 350 feet of that parcel where the
home occupation is bein~ conducted. the Citv Council or the Planninl: and
Zoninl: Department
Special Use Permits ~ranted bv Section 4.30(0) shall follow the criteria
established in Section" 01. Special Uses General Statement shall be
temporay:v in nature and shall be l:ranted to a desi~ated person who resides at
the address the home occupation is bein~ conducted. These permits shall be
automaticallv renewed each vear unless objections or complaints are received
within a one (1) vear period from anv three (3) residents within 350 feet of that
parcel where the home occupation is beini conducted. the Citv Councilor the
Plannini and Zonini Department Ifa Special Use Permit holder who was
iranted a permit under Section 4.30(0) dies or moves to a new location the
existinl: permit shall automaticallv terminate except in the case of death a
survivinl: spouse residin~ at the same address desires to continue the home
occupation. 'written notice to that effect shall be ~iven to the Plannin~ and
Zoninl: Department and the Citv Council mav authorize continuation of that
permit without further hearing.
2) There mav be one (I) annual inspection each vear bv the City Administrator or
'\dministrator"s desi~nee of the property covered bv the Special Use Permit
In addition, the Cit'" Administrator or the ~dministrator's designee shall. upon
reasonable request enter and inspect the premises covered bv said permit for
compliance purposes. If it is found that the permit and/or conditions of the
5
/
permit are not beinl: adhered to the applicant shall be notified in writinl: by the
City and ~iven ten (10) davs to come into strict compliance If compliance is
not achieved after the ten (I Q) day period the City Council shall hold a public
hearinl: to consider the maner and ma\! revoke the Special Use Permit.
(
3) Vested Ril:hts: No home occupation allowed bv a Special Use Permit shall
confer upon an\! person or to the benetit of any propertv o\vner anv vested
ri~ht to that use. rather the use shall remain subiect to all conditions of the
permit as established bv the Citv The Cit\! mav find it necessary from time to
review the conditions of the permit as thev relate to the protection of the
I:eneral welfare of the community.
4) Special Use Permits. once I:ranted. may be revoked bv the City Council for
cause after hearin\: before City Council. Complaints seeking revocation of
such permit shall be filed with the City Clerk and may be initiated bv the
Plannin~ and Zonin~ Department if it has reason to believe revocation may be
warranted. and/or any three (3) residents within 350 feet of that parcel where
the home occupation is beinl: conducted All such hearin~s shall be conducted
in accordance with Section 4 30(F)
5) All home occupations bein~ conducted at a property zoned for residential use
on the effective date of this ordinance shall have one hundred eiihty (180)
days thereafter to apply for the necessary Special Use Permit.
6) Persons who are conducting a business from property zoned for residential use
on the effective date of this ordinance must make application under this
Section but may continue to conduct such business pending final
determination of their application. Should the City Council deny the petition
for a Special Use Permit all such persons shall immediatelv cease their
business activities from such residential premises or complv with the
provisions in Section 4 30(B)
(f) Request for Hearinji
All requests bv residents or staff seeking revocation of a Special Use Permit for a home
occt\1lation shall be made in \Joiriting to the City Clerk. The City Clerk shall refer the
request to the Planning and Zoning Department. A staff report will be prepared and
discussed at a City Council Meetinl: within thirty (30) days from the date the wrinen
request was received. All property owners and occupants within three hundred and fifty
(350) feet of the property in question will be notified bv mail at least ten (10) days prior
to the City Council meeting. Failure of an\! property owner(s) or occupant(s) to receive
such notice shall not invalidate the proceedinl:s
At such hearing, the City Council shall determine whether revocation of the Special Use
Permit for the home occupation is warranted and shall issue ""Tinen Findings of Fact
Conclusions of Law and an Order pertinent to revocation. The Findings of Fact
6
Conclusions of Law and an Order shall be filed with the City Clerk and shall be mailed to
all interested parties appearin~ or represented at said hearinll
\. )
The City Attornev shall furnish such assistance and advice to the City Council as said
Council shall request.
(G) Revocation of Special Use Permit for Home Occupation
\Vhen the City Council determines that the puhlic interest so requires it may revoke or
suspend the Special Use Permit of a home occupation when it fi~ds after due
investillation and a public hearin~ that.
1) The permit holder or any of his or her employees have concealed the receipt of
stolen propertY or have knowinlllv received stolen property
2) The permit holder for the permit hac; not complied with the provisions oflaw
applicable to the premises. equipment or operation of the home occupation
3) The permit holder has obtained a permit throullh fraud or misstatement
4) The home occ~ation or activity is bein~ conducted in a manner found to be
detrimental to the health safety. or Ileneral welfare of the public or is a nuisance.
or is beinll operated or carried on in any unlawful manner
5) The home occupation has not been operatinll or in business for a period of six
(6) consecutive months.
(m Illeial Home Occupations
All home occupations that are beinll conducted in violation of this Section are
illellal and are subject to punishment defined bv State law
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this b1 day of October, 1996.
CITY OF ANDOVER
J~ /.~"L
, 'I ~:j
J" z" tr7~ ) k;J
J.E. McKelvey, Mayor
Attest:
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
, )
7
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
)
DATE: December 1 7. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Discussion Items
EDA Meeting
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
Jean D. McGann
ITEM NO.
Adopt 1 997 EDA Budget
15.
REQUEST:
The Economic Development Authority Board of Commissioners (Board) is requested to review and
adopt the attached resolution of the 1997 operating budget in the amount of $82,674.
BACKGROUND:
The Economic Development Authority operates as a separate legal entity and adopts an operating budget
independent ofthe City. City staff services can be shared by the EDA and the City. Staff time proposed
to be allocated to EDA functions in 1997 include the Administrator, Community Development Director
and the Finance Director.
,
j
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R- 96
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1997 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND
BUDGET.
WHEREAS, the preparation and adoption of operating budgets is recognized a
sound financial practice; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners has the responsibility to appropriately
and efficiently manage the funds of the Authority;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Commissioners of
the Andover Economic Development Authority hereby establishes the 1997 Economic
Development budget as submitted in the amount of $82,674.
Adopted by the Andover Economic Development Authority Board of Commissioners on
" this 17th day of December, 1996.
1. E. McKelvey, President
ATTEST:
Michael Knight, Secretary
, /
. /
CITY OF ANDOVER
Revenue/Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
12/6/962:57 PMECONDEV.XLS
\.
J
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPECIAL REVENUE
Revenues
Revenue Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget
~ 1993 1994 ~ film 1997
31050 Current Tax Increments $ - $ - $ - I $ 4,000.00 $ -
..... Subtotal. n, $ ...................... .. $ , . ... $'.. ........ ...~. $ 4,000.00 $ . ....
. - - -
34101 Rental Fees $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
. ....."",. "$' . . ." $.L...... .~....... '$- ....$ ..... ,.. $ .' '..
..... - .... .... '.' ... - -
..... ... .,....... ..... .........,.......
36240 TIF Admin. Fee $ - $ - $ 35,400.00 $ 78,200.00 $ 78,200
36210 Interest Earned - 938.39 330.28 1,500.00 1,500
36255 Sale of Land - 53,040.90 10,000.00 - 2,974
39201 Transfers from Other - 2,000.00 - - -
... Subtotal . $ "r $ , 55,979,29' $. 45,730.28 $ 79,700.00 82,614
-
... "."" I r
I
~'[()'[All!;~EVENUESJtrJi!jit~~.)rFl.~~l&)"i. j;;;11~5~19;2$t0i$;,451r~Q;~8X.jl$jr~l;\83;7.00;OO,'W~$t;;:t;;;;'T82:~Z~J
! I
Expenditures
Object Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget
~ ~ ~ ~ 1.9.9.6 I 1997
I Personal Services
101 Salaries $ - $ - $ 48,159.61 $ 53,460.00 $ 58,637
121 PERA - - 2,096.60 2,566.00 2,627
122 'FICA - - 2,879.23 i 3,315.00 3,636
125 Medicare - - 673.35 ! 775.00 I 850
131 Health Insurance - I - 2,776.28 3,454.00 I 3,890
132 Dental Insurance - - - i - 262
133 Life Insurance - i - 17.381 11.00 ! 112
'. ,
Subtotal $ - $ - $ 56,602.45 $ 63,581.00$ 70,014
I I I i I I
I I I I
! Supplies and Materials i . ;
I
i ! I ,
,
I
201 :General Office Supplies ! $ - I $ - I $ 1,292.14 , $ 4,000.00 $ 2,000
i
Subtotal $ - $ - $ 1,292,14 $ 4,000.00 $ 2,000
i I I i I I
I I
,
J
CITY OF ANDOVER 12/6/962:57 PMECONDEV.XLS
Revenue/Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
Object Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget
'. ~ ~ 19.9! 1995 ~ 1997
Purchased Services
I
301 Professional Services $ $ 3,827.90 $ 157.50 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000
304 Attorney I 3,126.45 2,100.00 2,100
322 Postage 250.00 I 500
330 Transportation 34.00 1,500.00 I 1,600
351 Publishing 980.00 2,000.00 i 2,000
352 Rate Programming 5,000.00 i
360 Insurance 165 00 165 00 I 190
Subtotal $ $ 6,954,35 $ 1,336.50 $ 14,015.00$ . 9,390
I
I
Other Services and Charges
416 Computer Services $ $ $ $ 170
433 Dues/Registrations 195.00 1,000.00 1,000
499 Contingency 1 104 00 100
... SlIbtotid ..... $ $ 195,00 $ .....2,104.00 $ 1,270
I
Equity Transfers
'.
, /
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
I
DATE:
December 1 7. 1 996
AGENDA SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM NO.
Acquisition of Mistelske and
Heidelberger Properties
lb.
Administration & Planning
J)ldv
Dick Fursman
City Administrator
1L
David L. Carlberg
Community Development Director
EDA Meeting
The Economic Development Authority is requested to discuss the acquisition of the Charles Mistelske
Property located at 13576 Jay Street NW and the Richard Heidelberger Properties located at 2052
Bunker Lake Boulevard NW (house) and one acre parcel located at 197x Bunker Lake Boulevard NW.
Charles Mistelske Property (Commercial Auto Parts)
The City contacted Mr. Mistelske by letter in September of 1996 to discuss the acquisition of
Commercial Auto Parts. Mr. Mistelske responded in early October indicating he was interested in
discussing the acquisition. Mr. Mistelske had indicated that he would have an appraisal done of his
\ property. Staff contacted Mr. Mistelske on December 10, 1996 inquiring on the status of the appraisal.
Mr. Mistelske indicated that an appraisal had been done but was tied up in court. He indicated that he
did not agree with the appraisal and that he felt it was low because it did not account for relocation
costslbenefits or the purchasing of his license to operate the business. He also indicated that he would
not accept what Wilber's Auto Parts was acquired for and that that was too low as well. He indicated he
is still interested in an offer in the right amount.
The EDA should determine what course of action needs to be taken to acquire this property. It does not
appear the City will be able to meet the expectations of Mr. Mistelske. Eminent Domain remains an
option for the Council to consider for the continuance of the redevelopment of the area.
Richard Heidelberger Property (House)
Staff has been informed that Ms. Heidelberger sold her property (house and a half acre of land) to her
son, Richard Heidelberger. Based on this action, it appears that the City will not be able to acquire the
property through negotiations. Eminent Domain remains an option for the Council to consider for the
continuance of the redevelopment of the area.
Richard Heidelberger Property (1 acre)
The City has made numerous attempts to discuss the acquisition of this parcel with Mr. Heidelberger,
but he is unwilling to sell the parcel. Eminent Domain remains an option for the Council to consider for
the continuance of the redevelopment of the area.
, /
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE December 17.1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance . ,\D-r'"'
Jean D. McGann
I ITEM NO. \ 1.
1997 Fee Schedule
REOUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to review the 1997 Fee Schedule and adopt the attached resolutions
related to these fees for 1997. The resolutions are as follows:
. A RESOLUTION SETTING RATES FOR PERMITS, CONNECTIONS FEES, SERVICES AND
WATER USAGE PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 55, SECTION 3 AND RESOLUTION NO. 101-81.
. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SERVICE CHARGES TO BE COLLECTED IN 1997.
. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PERMIT FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES TO BE COLLECTED
BY THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
. A RESOLUTION SETTING FEES FOR PERMITS, REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMITS,
V ARIANCES, PLATTING LICENSE FEES, LOT SPLITS, RENTAL FEES AND VARIOUS OTHER
FEES.
. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING USER FEES FOR THE USE OF FIELDS AND HOCKEY RINKS
WITHIN THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
BACKGROUND:
Each year the City of Andover reviews the fees charges for services, Based on this review, City Staff is
recommending the changes indicated on the following page.
)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
}
DATE:
December 17. 1996
Non-Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
Jean D. McGann
AGENDA SECTION
ITEM NO.
A 1997
Request:
The Andover City Council is requested to:
I. Adopt the attached resolution for the 1997 General Fund Budget as reviewed
and presented to the citizens at the public hearing on December 4,1996,
2. Adopt the attached resolution establishing the 1997 Property Tax Levy as presented tot he
\ citizens at the public hearing December 4, 1996,
BACKGROUND:
The City Council set priorities and goals for City programs and service delivery for 1997. Through a
series of meetings the City Council reviewed the operating budget, staffing requirements, the property
tax levy and other various revenues needed to support the delivery of the city services in 1997.
The various study sessions conducted by the City Council with staff established the proposed budget and
tax levy presented to citizens of Andover at the public hearing on December 4, 1996. The summary
budget is attached for your reference,
,
/
Sewer
Sewer Availability Charge
Sewer Usage Rates
Area A
Area B
Water
Water Meter Charges
2" Meter
Special Sizes
Water Usage Rates
Billed Quarterly
$ 950.00
$ 31.50
$ 43.50
$ 630.00
Cost plus 25% handling
$7.30 plus gallonage
$0.98 per 1,000 for 1 st 10,000 Gal.
$1.01 per 1,000 for 10,000 thru 20,000
$1.05 per 1,000 for 20,001 thru 35,000
$1,12 per 1,000 for 35,001 thru 60,000
$1.20 per 1,000 for 60,001 thru 100,000
$1.35 per 1,000 for 100,001 thru 200,000
$1,60 per 1,000 for 200,001 and above
Page 1 of2
, /
$900.00
$ 30.00
$ 42.00
$618.00
Cost plus 10% handling
$6.30 +1.01 per 1,000 gal.
CITY OF ANDOVER
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
1997 AND 1996 FEES
12/13/968:10 AMFEES.XLS
Fire:
Burning Permit
Building Reinspection Fees
Fire & Pyrotechnics Special Effect
Home Occupation Inspections
Other Inspections as Requested
Permits outline in Article 4, 1991 UFe
Special Investigation as Requested
'.
, /
;
$ 20.00
$ 42.00 based on UBe code
$ 250.00
$ 42.00 based on UBe code
$ 42.00 based on UBe code
$ 25.00
$ 42.00 based on UBe code
Page 2 of 2
$ 10,00
$
$
$
$
$
$
CITY OF ANDOVER
1997 Fee Schedule
FEES.XLS12/13/968:08 AM
Administrative Fee: 25% of total labor charges per hour (min. $13.00)
. Approval of Deeds:
Abstract Property $25.00
Torrens Property $40.00
Bad Check Fee $25.00
Cigarette License $25.00 per year
Copies: (per sheet)
Up to 8 1/2"x14" $0.25
Oversize $0.50
18"x24" $2.50
24"x36" $3,00
Larger Sizes $6.00
Copies of Surveys:
Up to 11"x17" $5.00
Requested by Owner $1.00
Demolition Permits:
Single Family Structures $30.00
Two Family Structures $40.00
Single/Double Garages $10.00
Barns $10.00
Multiple Family Structure
First Two Units $40.00
/
Each additional Unit $10.00
Commercial Units - minimum Fee $10.00
($2.00 per $100.00 Demolition Costs)
Dog License $5.00 per two years
Commercial Kennel $150.00
Recording Fee:
Abstract $25.00
Torrens $34,50
Renewal $25.00
Private Kennel $25.00
False Alarm Fine $75.00
Fire Hydrant Use Meter Cost (deposit) plus standard water rates
Flood Zone Search $15.00
Garbage Hauler License $25.00 per year + $15.00 per truck
Health Authority Certification . $5.00
Hockey Rinks:
Miscellaneous Youth Leagues $0.00 per team, per season
J Miscellaneous Adult Leagues $50.00 per team, per season
(including practices) + $10,
additional non resident fee
Page 1
CITY OF ANDOVER
1997 Fee Schedule
FEES'xLS12/13/968:08 AM
I Hockey Rinks continued:
Rink without Lights (Adults) $25.00 (fee per day)
Rink with Lights (Adults) $12.00 (fee per hour)
Horses:
Boarding $10.00 per day
Impoundment of Horses $25.00 per hour per person
Transportation (trailer rental) $40.00
Stable Fee $3,00
Junkyard License:
License $200.00
First Reinspection Fee $150.00
Second Reinspection Fee $200.00
Third Reinspection Fee $250.00
Liquor:
Non-Intoxicating
Off Sale $40,00 per year
On Sale $200.00 per year
Intoxicating: Sunday Liquor $200.00 per year
On Sale Liquor $4,000,00 per year
On Sale Wine $500.00 per year
Off Sale Liquor $200.00 per year
'. Maintenance Cost Recovery Union Scale + 25%
J Maps:
City Maps $2.00
Zoning Maps $3.50
Topographical Maps $11.00 per acre
Moving of Buildings
Up to 350 Square Feet $15.00
351 to 600 Square Feet $25.00
601 to 824 Square Feet $50.00
825 Square Feet & over $75.00
Notary $3.00
Ordinances: $1.00
Ordinance 8 $25.00
Ordinance 10 $10.00
Outdoor Party Permit $5.00
Pawnbroker License:
New $5,000.00 per year
Renewal $5,000.00 per year
Removal of Sediments & Debris from $80.00 per hour minimum charge 1/2 hour)
Streets subject to New Development & Building Activities
, Rental Housing License: $50.00 per unit (except owner occupied)
I Reinspection Fee per Call (2nd) $30.00
Research by Staff $25.00 per hour
Page 2
CITY OF ANDOVER
1997 Fee Schedule
FEES.xLS12/13/968:08 AM
Softball:
Adult Rec Play
Field without Lights
(Private Use)
Field with Lights
(Private Use)
$75.00 per team, per season
$10.00 additional, per player, non resident fee
$0.00 per team, per season
$0.00 additional, per player, non resident fee
$15.00 fee per hour
$75.00 fee per day
$20.00 fee per hour
$100.00 fee per day
Youth Rec Play
Softball (continued):
Rental of Equipment for Tournament
Limer $3,00 per tournament
Lime $3.50 per bag
Drag $1.50 per tournament
Hose and Nozzle $1.50 per tournament
Batter's Box $1.50 per tournament
Weekend Tournaments $150.00 per field with no maintenance
$300.00 per field with maintenance
Special Assessment Searches $12.00
Street Opening Permit $10.00
Sign Permit $1.00 per Square Foot
/ $3.00 per Square Foot Erected without Permit
Therapeutic Massage Establishment (all fees include investigation fee)
Single Application Fee $200.00
Corporate Application Fee $300.00
Partnership Application Fee $300.00
Renewal Fee $150.00
Therapeutic Massage Therapist $150.00 Annually
Trail Fee (Bikeway/Pathway) $250.00 per house
Transient Merchant License $50.00 per six (6) months
Tree Trimming:
License Fee $25.00 per year
Plan Check Fee for Trees $55.00
Building. Engineering. & Planning:
Agricultural Building Permit $5.00
Air Conditioning Installations $15,00
Building Reinspection Fee $42.00
Certificate of Occupancy $4.00
Commercial Site Plan Review $750.00
'\ Contractor Licenses:
. Contractor Verification Fee $5.00
Contractor License $25.00
Escrow Inspection Fee $25.00
Page 3
CITY OF ANDOVER
1997 Fee Schedule
FEES.XLS12/13/968:08 AM
Building. Engineering. & Planning: continued
/ Footing to Grade $15.00
Gas Fireplace Permit $40.00 per unit
Grading Inspection Fees:
First Inspection No Charge
Second Inspection No Charge
Third Inspection $35.00
Fourth Inspections $75.00
Fifth and any subsequent Inspections $100.00 each
Heating Installations (furnace) $25.00
Lot Split Fee:
Lot Split $100.00
Recording Fee/Lot Split
Abstract Property $25.00
Torrens Property $34.50
Plan Check for Trees $60.00
Plan Check/Residential 65% of permit fee
Plat Fees:
Preliminary Plat Filing Fee $60.00
, Preliminary Plat Per Acre Fee $22.00
J Final Plat Fee $20.00
Plat Escrow Deposit
Urban Lot $100.00 per lot
Rural Lot $450.00 per lot
Plumbing (per opening) $8.00 minimum fee $15.00
Rezoning: $250.00
Recording Fee for Rezoning
Abstract Property $25.00
Torrens Property $34.50
Special Use Permit:
Commercial $200.00
Residential $150,00
Amended Special Use Permit $100.00
Recording Fee/Special Use
Abstract Property $25.00
Torrens Property $34.50
Variances:
" Single Family $100.00
/ Other Requests $125,00
(minimum fee) $20.00
Page 4
CITY OF ANDOVER
1997 Fee Schedule
FEES.xLS12/13/968:08 AM
, e:
I
Building Reinspection Fees $42.00 per hour
Burning Permits $20.00
Fire & Pyrotechnics Special Effects $250.00
Home Occupation Inspections $42.00 per hour
Other Inspections as Requested $42.00 per hour
Permits outlined in Article 4,1991 UFC $25.00
Special Investigation as Requested $42.00 per hour
Septic:
On-Site Septic System Installation $35.00
Septic System Pumping $3.00
Septic Dumping $5,00 per load
Sewer:
Sewer Availability Charge $950.00
Sewer Contracting
" Equipment Fee $80.00 per hour
/ Labor Fee Union Scale plus 25%
Sewer Usage Rates:
Penalty/Late Payment $0.10
Area A $31.50 per quarter
Area B $43,50 per quarter
Sanitary Sewer Installation $25.00
Sanitary Sewer Rates
Sewer Area Charge $1,065.00 per acre
Sewer Connection Fee
(Commercial Connection Fee
Rate = 1 connection fee for
each SAC unit) $290.00 per unit
Laterals $24.00 per F.F. (estimate)
Hookup Permit Fee (Sewer) $40.00 plus surcharge
Sewer Availability Charge (Metro) $950.00
Plumbing Homeowner contracts for
Page 5
CITY OF ANDOVER
1997 Fee Schedule
FEES.XLS12/13/968:08 AM
I
, '.'ater:
- / Water Installation (public) $50.00
Water Permit Fees:
Service/Connection $50.00
Tapping Main $30,00
Disconnection/Reconnection Requests $20.00
HVAC $15,00
Underground Sprinklers $15.00
Re-Inspection (all) $25.00
Service Charges:
Testing
Up to 6" meters Cost plus 20%
Violation Penalties
Shut-off (7 a.m. - 3 p.m.) $50.00
Shut-off (after hours) $50.00
Water Meter Charges:
5/8" meter $125.00
3/4" meter (short lay length) $150.00
1" meter $265.00
1 1/2" meter $452,00
, 2" meter $630.00
/ Special Sizes Cost plus 25% handling
Laterals $24.00 per F.F. (estimate)
Unit Connection Charges:
Residential $1,225.00 per unit
Non-residential, per REC $610,00 per unit or $6,100. whichever is higher
Water Area Charges:
Residential and Commercial $1,130.00 per acre
Water Usage Rates:
Minimum Charge $7.30 plus gallonage charge
$0.98 per 1,000 for 1st 10,000 Gal.
$1.01 per 1,000 for 10,000 through 20,000
$1.05 per 1,000 for 20,001 through 35,000
$1.12 per 1,000 for 35,001 through 60,000
$1.20 per 1,000 for 60,001 through 100,000
$1.35 per 1,000 for 100,001 through 200,000
$1.60 per 1,000 for 200,001 and above
Minimum per Quarter $8.30
Penalty/Late Payment 10%
Well and Septic Locate $30.00 per hour
,
/
Page 6
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
/
RESOLUTION NO. R - 96
A RESOLUTION SETTING RATES FOR PERMITS, CONNECTION FEES, SERVICES
AND WATER USAGE PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 55, SECTION 3 AND
RESOLUTION NO. 101-81.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION 1. WATER PERMIT FEES
REF. ORDINANCE 55
I. Service/Connection
2. Tapping Main
3. DisconnectionlReconnection Requests
4. HVAC
5, Underground Sprinklers
6. Re-inspection (all)
$50.00
30.00
20.00
15.00
15.00
25.00
Section 21 and 22
Section 9
Section 12
Section 20
SECTION 2. SERVICE CHARGES
1. Testing
o to 6" meters Cost plus 20%
2. Violation P
Shut-off (7:00 AM - 3:00 PM) 50.00
Shut-off (after hours) 50.00
'.
, J
SECTION 3. WATER METER CHARGES
1. 3/4" Meter (Short lay length)
2. 5/8" Meter
3. I" Meter
4. 1 1/2" Meter
5. 2" Meter
6. Special Sizes
7. Laterals
$150.00
125.00
265.00
452,00
630.00
Cost plus 25% handling
$24.00/F.F. (estimate)
SECTION 4. UNIT CONNECTION CHARGES
1, Residential
2. Non-Residential, per REC
SECTION 5. WATER AREA CHARGES
I. Residential and Commercial
$1,225.00 per unit
610.00 per unit or $6,100,00 whichever is
higher
$1,130.00 per acre
SECTION 6. USAGE CHARGES
1. Water:
Billed Quarterly
Minimum per quarter
PenaltyILate payment
$7.30
.98 per 1,000 for 1st 10,000 gal.
1.01 per 1,000 for 10,001 through 20,000
1.05 per 1,000 for 20,001 through 35,000
1.12 per 1,000 for 35,001 through 60,000
1.20 per 1,000 for 60,001 through 100,000
1.35 per 1,000 for 100,001 through 200,000
1.60 per 1,000 for 200,00 I and above
8,30
10%
/
2. Sewer:
Area A
Area B
PenaltyILate payment
$31.50 per quarter
43,50 per quarter
10%
SECTION 7. SANITARY SEWER RATES
. ,
1. Sewer Area Charge $1,065 per acre
2. Sewer Connection fee
(Commercial Connection
Fee Rate=l Connection
Fee for each SAC Unit) $290,00 per unit
3. Laterals $ 24.00/F.F (Estimate)
4. Hookup Permit Fee (Sewer) 40,00 plus surcharge
5. Sewer Availability Charge (Metro) 950.00
6. Plumbing (Homeowner contracts for)
~, -'
SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE
The rate charges as shown shall be effective January 1, 1997.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 17th day of December, 1996.
CITY OF ANDOVER
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria V olk, City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R- 96
, J
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SERVICE CHARGES TO BE COLLECTED IN 1997.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby resolves:
The following service charges are hereby established for the year 1997.
, /
SERVICE
Flood Zone Search
Well and Septic Locate
Special Assessment Searches
City Maps
Zoning Maps
Copies (per sheet)
Up to 8 Y2X 14
Oversize
18" X 24"
24" X 36"
Larger sizes
Copies of surveys
Up to 11" X 17"
Requested by owner
Ordinance 8
Ordinance 10
All other ordinances
Notary
Bad check fee
Topographical Maps
Approval of Deeds
Abstract property
Torrens property
Maintenance Cost Recovery
Research by Staff
Administrative Fee
CHARGE
$15.00
30.00 per hour
12.00
2.00
3.50
.25
50
2.50
3.00
6.00
5.00
1.00
25,00
10.00
1.00
3.00
25.00
11,00 per acre
25.00
40.00
Union scale + 25%
25.00 per hour (min. 13.00)
25% of total labor charge
Adopted by the City Council ofthe City of Andover this 17th day of December, 1996,
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J, E. McKelvey
/
Victoria V olk, City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R- 96
J A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PERMIT FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES TO BY
COLLECTED BY THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby resolves:
The following permit fees and service charges are hereby established for the year 1997.
/
TYPE OF PERMIT
Certificate of Occupancy
Plan ChecklResidential
Plan Check/Trees
Heating Installations
Air Conditioning Installations
Plumbing (per opening)
(minimum fee)
On-Site Septic System Installation
Sanitary Sewer Installation
Septic System Pumping
Water Installation (public)
Agricultural Building
Footing to Grade
Health Authority Certification
Footing to Grade
Health Authority Certification
Escrow Inspection Fee
Building Reinspection Fee
Grading Inspection Fee
FEE
$ 4.00
65% of permit fee
60.00
25.00
15.00
8,00
15,00
35.00
25,00
3.00
50,00
5.00
15.00
5.00
15.00
5,00
25.00
42.00
First Inspection No Charge
Second Inspection No Charge
Third Inspection $ 35.00
Fourth Inspection 75,00
Fifth and above 100.00 each
Septic Dumping 5.00 per load
Gas Fireplace Permit 40.00 per unit
The permit fee schedule for the Building Department for 1997 shall be as follows:
I. State of Minnesota Building Valuation Data, cost per square foot, dated February, 1987.
2. Fees for Commercial Buildings shall be computed on the contract bid price. Plan check
fee shall be 65% ofthe permit fee.
3. Permit fee shall be based on the 1994 Uniform Building Code Schedule lA.
The above fees apply to repairs and alterations requiring inspections as well as all new installations.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 17th day of December 1996.
CITY OF ANDOVER
,; ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria V olk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R- 96
\.
J A RESOLUTION SETTING FEES FOR PERMITS, REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMITS,
VARIANCES, PLATTING, LICENSE FEES, LOT SPLITS, RENTAL FEES AND VARIOUS
OTHER FEES.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby resolves:
The following fees are hereby established for the year 1997.
, ~
TYPE OF FEE
Moving of Buildings
Up to 350 Square Feet
351 to 600 Square Feet
601 to 824 Square Feet
825 Square Feet and Over
Rezoning
Recording Fee for Rezoning
Abstract Property
Torrens Property
Special Use Permit
Commercial
Residential
Amended Special Use Permit
Recording Fee/Special Use
Abstract Property
Torrens Property
FEE
ORDINANCE
$ 15.00
25.00
50.00
75.00
200.00
4
8
25.00
34.50
8
200,00
150.00
100.00
25.00
34.50
Variances
Single Family
Other Request
Minimum Fee
Sign Permits
Erected Without Permit
Plat Fees
Preliminary Plat Filing Fee
Preliminary Plat Per Acre Fee
Final Plat Fee
Plat Escrow Deposit
Urban Lot
Rural Lot
Commercial Site Plan Review
Sewer Availability Charge
Fire
8
100.00
125.00
20.00
1.00 per Sq. Ft
3,00 per Sq. Ft
8
10
60.00
22.00
20.00
100.00
450.00
750.00
950,00
-'
Building Reinspection Fees
Burning Permits
Fire & Pyrotechnics Special Effects
Home Occupation Inspections
Other Inspections as Requested
Permits outlined in Article 4,1991 UFC
Special Investigation as Requested
42,00 per hour
20.00
250,00
42.00 per hour
42,00 per hour
25.00
42.00 per hour
Demolition Permits 13
Single Family Structures 30.00
Two Family Structures 40.00
Single/Double Garages 10.00
Barns 10,00
,
J Multiple Family Structures
First Two Units 40.00
Each Additional Unit 10,00
Commercial Units - Minimum Fee 10.00
($2,00 per $100.00 Demolition Costs)
Contractor Licenses
Contractor Verification Fee 5.00
Contractor License 25.00
Boarding of Horses 23
Boarding 10.00 per day
Impoundment of Horses 25.00 per hour per person
Transportation (trailer rental) 40.00
Stable Fee 3.00
Non-Intoxicating Liquor 28
Off Sale 40.00 per year
On Sale 200.00 per year
Tree Trimming 29c
License Fee 25.00 per year
Plan Check Fee for Trees 55,00
Street Opening Permit 10.00 35
Lot Split Fee 40
Lot Split 100.00
J
Recording FeelLot Split
Abstract Property 25.00
Torrens Property 34.50
Junkyard License 44
License 200.00
First Reinspection Fee 150.00
Second Reinspection Fee 200.00
Third Reinspection Fee 250.00
Cigarette License 25,00 per year 45
Outdoor Party Permit 5.00 51
Dog License 5,00 per two years 53
Commercial Kennel 150.00
Recording Fee:
Abstract 25.00
Torrens 34.50
Renewal 25.00
Private Kennel 25.00
Fire Hydrant Use Meter Cost (deposit)
+ Standard Water Rates 55
Intoxicating Liquor 56
; On Sale Liquor 4,000.00 per year
On Sale Wine 500.00 per year
On Sale Sunday 200.00 per year
Off Sale Liquor 200.00 per year
Transient Merchant License 50.00 per six months 79
Pawnbroker License
New
Renewal
Therapeutic Massage Establishment
Single Application Fee
Corporate Application Fee
Partnership Application Fee
Renewal Fee
Massage Therapist
Annual License Fee
75.00 96
50.00 per unit (except owner occupied)
30,00
25.00 per year
+ 15.00 per truck 102
104
False Alarm Fine
Rental Housing License
Reinspection Fee per Call
Garbage Hauler License
5,000.00 per year
5,000.00 per year
110.00
200.00
300.00
300.00
150.00
110
150.00
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 19th Day of December, 1995.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey
Victoria V olk, City Clerk
" J
. ,
)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R_96
J A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 1997 USER FEES FOR THE USE OF FIELDS AND
HOCKEY RINKS WITHIN THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
The City Council ofthe City of Andover hereby ordains:
The following fees are hereby established:
TYPE OF FEE
FEE - Flat Rate
$75 per team, per season
$10 additional, per player, non-resident fee
$ 0 per team, per season
$ 0 additional, per player, non-resident fee
Note: Includes the use of fields for both lighted and non-lighted.
Adult Rec Play
Youth Rec Play
Field w/o Lights
(Private Use)
Field w/Lights
(Private Use)
$15 Fee per hour
$75 Fee per day
$20 Fee per hour
$100 Fee per day
. J
Miscellaneous Adult Leagues
$ 0 per team, per season
$50 per team, per season
including practices
plus a $10 additional non-
resident fee per player
Miscellaneous Youth Leagues
Rental of Equipment for Tournament
Limer
Lime
Drag
Hose and nozzle
Batter's Box
Weekend Tournaments
Rink Without Lights (Adults)
$ 3.00 per toumament
$ 3.50 per bag
$ 1.50 per tournament
$ 1.50 per tournament
$ 1.50 per tournament
$150.00 per field with no
maintenance
$300.00 per field with
maintenance
$25 (Fee per day)
Rink With Lights (Adults)
$12 (Fee per hour)
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 17th day of December, 1996.
CITY OF ANDOVER
, J
ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey
Victoria V olk - City Clerk
J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R-_96
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1997 GENERAL FUND BUDGET
WHEREAS, the preparation and adoption of operating budgets is recognized a
sound financial practice; and
WHEREAS, the City of Andover receives significant financial support from its
residents through the payment of property taxes; and
WHEREAS, the Andover City Council has the responsibility to appropriately and
efficiently manage the funds of the City;
WHEREAS, the City of Andover complies with the State of Minnesota Truth in
Taxation requirements including soliciting public input through a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Andover passed Resolution Number
establishing the 1997 Levy;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Andover City Council hereby
establishes the 1997 General Fund Budget as submitted, with revenues and expenditures
each totaling $4,571,536.
Adopted by the Andover City Council on this 17th day of December, 1996,
CITY OF ANDOVER
1. E. McKelvey, Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria V olk, City Clerk
.I
)
J
CITY OF ANDOVER
Budget Summary - General Operating Budget
Budget Budget
1996 l221
REVENUES
Property Taxes 2,200,924.00 2,412,301
License and Permits 343,820.00 344,430
Intergovernmental Revenues 759,484.00 810,805
Charges for Current Services 310,100.00 470,900
Fines and Forfeits 37,000.00 39,100
Miscellaneous Revenue 161,800.00 166,900
Transfers 71.000.00 327.100
111h.i:UllmNl!~II ~~~~~~~~~l~U W$mf5~6
::::Hr:r~~~:: ::;:::::;:::;:;:;:::;:::::::::::::::::::::;:::;::::::::::::::."::;:: ",.;;.;:::;. ";". .::;:;
... """"""';';""';';';';';;;';;;;;;;;;';;;;;;;;;;;;';;;;",...I..:i..';':....~,:.:,',:..,',..:..;',',
EXPENDITURES
General Government 1,058,687.00 1,287,380
Public Safety 1,236,076.00 1,439,916
Public Works 1,450,418.00 1,741,792
Other 138.947.00 102.448
....mO'ilhtn..ENltmMDlttrtrrmS..N................ ~~$.$,;t~lt~Ja ;';';';';';';';';';""';';"""""""""';"';';'";';';';';';';'ijt5ttt"'5!Uf"
". . . ... . .. . ........... :;:;:;:::;:;
.:.:.......:. ....:....;..;.;.;.; :',;' ..... :. .:;....:.:... . ;.:.:.;.;.:.;.;.:.:.;.;
.... .... ... . .... .. . . . .' ,..... .. .. ...........
... . . . .. . . '" ... .. . ...... . ........... ;:::::::;::;
...... ..... .... . .... . ... .... .. ............ {:::::::;:t!:::;::::t:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::f... .~.'.. ::: .:::. .J:', ::.::.....f
... .. ... . .... ............
.....................................................................,..............................................'.
...............................................................................
[:[:IIII[:(IIIlIB1ISDlIm::::[::I:j[!:[ ~~~jj~~~~j~~~j~~~~~1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1~~~~j~~~\1~~~~~~j~~~;~;;;i;;;i;~;i;~;i;;;i;;;;~~~1~~~~~~~~~~~j~~~~j~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1~~~1~~~: ~~~1~1~~~~lj~~~jj~~~~~~j~~~~~j~~~~~j~~~~~~~~~1~~~~~~~~;i;;;;;~;;;i;;;;;~;;;i;~;j~1j~j~~~j~~jj~~~1j1~~jj~j~~~j~~j1~~~~~1~~~1j~~~~1~~j1~1~
j
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
"\
RES. NO. R- 96
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE 1997 LEVY TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATION BY THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
The total non-bonded indebtedness levy is hereby set at $2,256,917. Of this levy, $2,240,288 is of
general purposes and is levied against all taxable property within the City of Andover. The remaining
$16,629 is levied against the properties located within the Lower Rum River Watershed Management
Organization Taxing District for the City of Andover's share of costs for this organization.
The total bonded indebtedness levy is hereby set at $515,044 to fund the following indebtedness:
1992 Certificate of Indebtedness
1994 Certificate of Indebtedness
1995 Certificate of Indebtedness
1991 Fire Station Bonds
$ 37,704
33,262
119,107
324971
Total
515.044
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER FURTHER RESOLVES that the scheduled
levy of$21,541 for the FHA/G.O. Improvement Bonds of 1977 is hereby canceled for 1997 per
R68-81.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 17th day of December, 1996.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J, E. McKelvey, Mayor
Victoria V olk, City Clerk
"
J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
, )
DATE: December 17. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
Jean D. McGann
ITEM NO.
Adopt 1997 Debt Service Budget
\q.
REQUEST:
The Andover City Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution setting the 1997 budget for the
Debt Service Budgets,
BACKGROUND:
The City Council set priorities and goals for City programs and service delivery for 1997. Through a
series of meetings the City Council reviewed the operating budget, staffing requirements, the property
tax levy and other various revenues needed to support the delivery of the city services in 1997.
The various study sessions conducted by the City Council with staff established the proposed budget and
tax levy presented to citizens of Andover at the public hearing on December 4, 1996. The Debt Service
Budget is attached for your reference.
,~ J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R-_96
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1997 DEBT SERVICE BUDGET
WHEREAS, the preparation and adoption of operating budgets is recognized a
sound financial practice; and
WHEREAS, the City of Andover receives significant financial support from its
residents through the payment of property taxes; and
WHEREAS, the Andover City Council has the responsibility to appropriately and
efficiently manage the funds of the City;
WHEREAS, the City of Andover complies with the State of Minnesota Truth in
Taxation requirements including soliciting public input through a public hearing; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Andover City Council hereby
establishes the 1997 Debt Service Budget as submitted.
.'
Adopted by the Andover City Council on this 17th day of December, 1996.
J. E. McKelvey, Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria V olk, City Clerk
\
}
~
o
en I-
Ww
z(!)
~o
:2:=>
_Ill
'\ 0:: ....I
w~
;> =>
Oz
Oz
z~
~r-
u.o>
00>
..-
~
t5
/
w
o
~
zw
OC/)
-I-
~m
~w
00
C/)
c
z
o
Zlll
OZ
-0
~i=
O~
i:i:Cl
Ci5::::i
enm
::SO
0....1
~
W
Z
W
Cl
~i
=>w
u.C
o
-l~
~w
0C/)
1-1-
m
w
c
III
'C
C
CO 0
~m
e
u.
g)
w
ggj
en
z
o
~
o
i:i:
::s
o
r-M'","
0> r- r-
","0 "'"
MM as
..-r- N
M ..-
<I) <I) <I) <I) <I) <I)
co <0 I ,.....
(00) 0
"'""'" 0
.....- as lC)
0>"," <Xl
..-
<I)
m,..... I,.....
Nr- (0
Ol() "'"
N"'<i M
NN "'"
..-
<I)
Q)
~
C
Q)
>
Q)
0::
-c
<(
"'C~
:{l ~ ~ ~
X .C c: 0
co CO <u "0
1-g.><1l
~O~"*
CD - CD
a.<1l(ij E
e .~ 0 0
Q.u...9:r:
OO..-NOO
.....""tOOT"'"T"'"
OO","","NN
__"f""" ("I') ("I')(Qm
M M M M M M
...
CD
3=
CD
en
-C
c:
<1l
...
CD
g:,~
c
.2 E
... 0
<1l ...
w-
...
- CD
III _
CD en
... c:
2~
EI-
III
e
~
~
'C
c:
Q)
Co
)(
W
ONO
0","0
00..-
cD ~ T"'"-
l()N
M ..-
<I) <I) <I)
o l()0
or-l()
o M l()
o l()
l() <Xl
N
<I)
or-
0(0
0(0
cD.n
o M
..-
<I)
Q)
lJ
.~
Q)
C/)
..
..c
Q)
c
-
c:
CD
(ij-~
a. en
'0 ~ co
c Q) ~
~EU:
o
o
o
r-
"'"
..- ..- 0
O..-N
(0(0(0
CD
CD
U.
/
0
z c(
Q W
cnl-
-c(
;:::1-
Oil)
II)
0
zZ
00
_m
~z
uQ
-I-
~ !:!::c(
cnC)
0 cn-
(1)1- :5~
Ww UO
ZC) ..J '1.0 , 01.00
~O i2 w N or- 1.0
::!::) CD Or-CD
w (,) oc!S
~m z ..J~ CD
n::...J CD 1.0
W
'<( ~W
,:) Oil)
UZ 1-1-
Oz m
Z< w
<.... c
u..en ~ ~
Oen
.... '1.0 , 0 1.0 0
>- w I N 0 r- 1.0
!:: I- CD 0 r-CD
() ~ c!S 0 c!S
CD 1.0
II)
o 1-1 .-
zm lD
=>w M
u..C ~ ~
.?;o
i:3~
,U (/)
- , .?;oc
ro_ca>
o.(/):JEu
'0 ~ 0 .-
.~ JY () ~ <( enOl
- o2c:
a.. :: en c:x j!! 'c
cc:c: U)(ij
Q)Q)Q)~row
E E E _ 0.-
(/'J U'J W c: .- <n
m ~ m ~ .g ~
UJ (/) UJ '- c: Q)
m(f)UJ=,:::::I-
<(<(<(u::!!:.!:
.-NMOr-O
00 0 LO..........
T"'"..........O~N
<0(0(0.....('1')(0
MMMMMM
:5
u
CD
:J
C
CD
>
CD
a::
w
8 gl
en
CD
..
:J
~
'C
C
CD
C.
><
W
CD
U
.~
CD
II)
-
.c
CD
o
C
C
c
r-
"'"
ro_
O.(/)
.13 ~ ro
'2 JY ~
a..!:ii:
...... ......0
O......N
CD co CD
Q)
Q)
u..
-
c
Q)
01
<(
/
C/l
I-
Z W . LO o LO 0
W 0 N Ol'-M
::!E ...J~ (0 O. .,..._ l{).
W '<I" o ON
a:: I5w CO I'- N
Z 0 CO M LO
0 Z OC/l
C/l- 1-1-
->< llJ
;:::< W
01- 0 (I) (I)
I I'- 0 LO I
u..: (0 0 N
W I'- 0
C/l a:: CO cicri
0 en 0 0>'<1"
Z ..... llJ N
~ 2 M '<I"
QllJ en
en
0 ~Z .... (I) (I)
t/) I- uQ
w w -I- llJ I co I 0 00
Z C) !:!::< M M 0 OM
Zc enC) co en M o MM
en cici
:g;:) en- ..... .... 0
:5ffi M N LOa
~a:l LL LO M
C::::,...J UO i= (I) (I)
<C ...J ~ I 0 ; OLOO
, ~ ~
u' N ON'<I"
c~ LO 0_ (0_ I'-
W ..... LO o ..-
Z<( Z '<I" LO '<I"N
<(..... W M ..- ..-
LL en C) (I) (I)
0 en
....
~ ~ 0 LO 0
~] 0 NM
0..-1'-
U ..... cicri
'<I"
M 0'<1"
..-
(I) (I)
llJ 0 0
'<I" 0 M
..... en J 0 I'-
o 1-1 .., en ci
2llJ M .... 0>
::::>W LL
LLO i= (I) (I)
iG
-
~ 0
.- ~ 1-0
U .-
,U oo
(ij I ~"E
en - c Q)
0. oo ::J E -c
2 '0 2! 0 Q) <(
c 2 U ~ oo Q)
'C U Q) Cl Q)
I- a. E oo E 10 .5 Ul CD LL
<( - - c CD -
C c "E >< Ci5 ~ ~ u c
u: Q) Q) Q) t1l t1l ::2 .~ Q)
CD E E E I- (ijW ~ Cl
::2 - 0.- "C CD ~ti~
\ en c oo oo oo c .- oo c C/l
en oo oo oo .2 ~
/ CD Q) Q) Q) 2! CD - .- Q) t1l
:5 > oo oo oo ~ C Q) c.. .c u ~ u
CD oo oo III ::J ::l_ >< CD .5 Q) oo
s.... c.-
U a:: <( <( <( U ::2:E W 0 a._LL
W ..- N M 0 I'- 0 0
0 ~1 0 0 0 LO ..- ..- 0
0 ..- ..- ..- 0 '<I"N 0 ..- ..- 0
(0 (0 (0 ..- M(O ..... 0 ..- N
U M M M M MM .., (0 (0 (0
I a> (0 co , ~I 0 '" 0
~ (0 N 0 0 '" a>
I- LO N """- 0 0 0
m 0 cD r-: ~ ci .0 <i
~ LO LO ~
/ W I- '" a> '"
0 m
Y) , ., Y)
~ 0 , 0 ~: 0 0 0
il (0 """ 0 0 0 0
r- CO N ~ 0 LO CO
.., cD a> " 0 ci
.., N N: 0 0
'" ~
Y) Y)
l- i , (0 , 0 ~'I 0 LO 0
'" 0 0 '" 0
Z '" '" 0 N r-
W .., oi ~ ci cD
::!: ..,
M 0 ~ ~ co
en ~ ~ N
en
W Y) Y)
en
en , """ , 0 ~1 0 0 0
oct '" 0 0 """ a>
Z ...J ~I (0 co 0 """. (0
0 :$ 0 (0 ci '"
M LO LO LO
(f) (.) M ~
5 w
a..
0 en Y) Y)
< , '" , 0 ~i 0 '" LO
l- LL '" 0 0 '" N
0 W r- co o. r- (0
en 0:: a> ~ 0 oi
(f) I- 0 a> ~ a> N
W W Z N m N ~
Z C> z 0 M ..,
Z 0 a>
C m a>
::!: ~ ~ z ... Y) Y)
llJ U 0 t
ri...J u:: ~ a.. ~ """ r- 0 ;1 0 LO LO
'< ::!: ~ co co 0 0 r- r-
(j) Cl co ~ r- (0 , (0 0 '" co
,~ (f) N oct cD .0 '" oi LO co
U Z ::s ::i M .., ~ N
C Z m co
z < u 0 a> Y) Y)
...
< """ ...J ~I
~ ; ~ """ ~ 0 0 0 0
Ll- en r- r- LO 0 0 0 0
0 en ~ r- , ~ 0 0 """
.... W M to: cD ci c<i
~ Z N
M N
W
CJ Cl Y)
Y)
; (0 co r- 0 ~! 0 0 ,
N N (0 0 0 LO
... """. ~ N ~ 0 r-
0 ~I N ~ ~ ci oi LO ~
Z M ~ """ CD t LO '"
::J Y) Y)
LL
~
G~
,U rn
- ,~c
~ (;) [: Q)
.u!lli5E:2
-"~<(rn
.~ 2 \oJ Cl
- IOjBc
~ = 2 c:x jg 02
c: c: r::: (J) ro
QlQlQl~liiW
E E E ~ a.~
(/) VJ (/j c .- en
~ ~ m 2? .~ ~
~~~552
<(<(<(U::2;E
c;;
-
{2
rn
G)
..
::s
~
'tl
C
G)
Co
><
W
G)
CJ
.~
G)
en
-
.c
G)
o
Ql
Ql
LL
~
C
Ql
Iii~~
a.rn
.- Ql Iii
u ~ u
.5 Ql rn
0::5u:
::s
U
G)
::s
c
G)
>
G)
0::
W
Cl
8 ~1
~N"'Or-O
OOOLO~T'""
"If"-T'"""f'"-O"l:tN
<OCOtOT'""MCO
'" '" '" '" '" '"
o
o
o
r-
"""
~ ~o
o ~N
(0(0(0
W ~ co N , 0 0 I'- 0 I'-
I (.) <0 C') 0 0 0 <0 CO 'It
~ CO ~ ~ <0 0 '<t 0 II)
...J I.() ~ N ~ ci lli r-: .N
~ W I'- ~ I'- '<t m 0 0
VJ N_ I.() ~ C') <0 N
0 l- N lli cD
I- m
W E/) E/) i/t
0 i
I N 0 '<t , 0 0 '<t 0 ~i
~ ~ ~ m 0 0 I.() I'-
I- ~ m co <0 0 '<t m .'It ..
r-: M ci '<t ci ci N M
m I.() N '<t '<t m
W l- N N ~ '<t '<t
0 m N ~
::l
VJ E/) E/)
VJ ; , C') 0 I.() 0 ,m'l
I-
z 0 0 '<t 0
<0 0 N I.()
W CD cD 0 r-: ~ CIO '
::E 'It I'- I.() N I'-.i
VJ M
VJ
W E/) E/)
VJ
c( ; co , I'- , 0 0 C') 0
co I'- 0 0 co co
c( Z ...J I.() <0 0 0 C') '<t
0 :!!; II) '<t ci I'- I.() I.()
I- en .., N ~ ~ 0 N
e (.) M C') N ~
5 W
VJ l- ll..
W W C5 VJ E/) E/)
z C)
z c I I'- ~ , 0 0 ~ 0
I'- I'- 0 0 I.() I.()
:i5 ::J VJ ~ co_ I'- 0 I.() C')
Ii co 0 ; ~ N r-: I.() I'-
N .., ~ I.()
,...J M ~ ~
c(
~::l E/) E/)
v z
c Z ll.. 0 , 0 0 0 0
z <( 0 0 0 C') ~
<( c( ~ 0 0 0 '<t_ C')
to. M ci <0 lli 0
LL. en .., 0 0 ~ 0 I'-
e en M .., <0 ~ I'- ~
.... en M
~ en ~
.... E/) E/)
(3 0 0 C') , 0 0 I.() 0
I I'- ~ '<t 0 0 co I.()
I.() m C') ~ 0 <0 C')
N ci M <0 ~ I.() m
'It ~ <0 co 0
M C') ....
E/) E/)
OI-l
zm
::lW
LL.C
/
~ ~o
o ~N
co coco
~
0~
,C) <Jl
- I ~c
COi_CQ)
,Q.~:>E"O
o,-oQ)<(
"e 2 u U ~
a.-=~-=JB.5
___ .!!!c
aiaiaiX(f.lro
EEE~(ijW
~ ~ ~ C .9- (;)
Q) Q) Q) ~ .~ Q)
U'J UJ U) "- c <u
fnU)UJ::J:J-
<(<(<(C):2E
-
c
Q)
C)
lliii~
'0 ~ rl
.~ 2 (/)
'- c.'-
a._LL.
VI
Gl
..
::s
:!::
"C
r:::
Gl
c.
><
W
Gl
U
.~
Gl
VJ
-
..c
Gl
o
LL.
(f.l
(f.l
:5
C)
Gl
::s
r:::
Gl
>
Gl
e:::
w
o
8 ~1
o
o
o
I'-
..,
..--NMOr-O
OOOLO..--..--
..--..--..--ovC'\l
<0<0<0..--("1')(0
C') C') C') C') C') C')
Q)
Q)
LL.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
"-
/
DATE: December 1 7. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Non-Discussion
ITEM NO.
Adopt 1997 Special Revenue Fund Budgets
ft).
REQUEST:
The Andover City Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution setting the 1997 budget for the
Special Revenue Fund budgets.
BACKGROUND:
"-
)
Special Revenue Funds are established to justify revenue sources that finance particular functions or
projects. The City of Andover has four Special Revenue funds that are listed below.
1. Drainage and mapping: To maintain and develop new mapping information systems.
2. Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization: To provide for conservation of
water and natural resources.
3. Forestry: To preserve forest resources and develop control plans to ensure preservation of
these resources.
4. Capital Equipment Reserve: To provide funding for Capital Expenditures.
'\
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE December 17.1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance ~\)""
Jean D. McGann
I ITEM NO.c::x \ .
1997 Sewer Rates
REOUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to review the 1997 Rate Schedule for quarterly Sewer charges.
BACKGROUND:
, At the regular City Council meeting on December 3,1996, the Andover City Council reviewed the proposed
Sewer rate changes for 1997. At this time the Council directed staff to recalculate the rate changes to have the
same amount of increase for Area A and Area B. City Staff has done this recalculation and determined that to
generate the same amount of additional revenue proposed in the first rate change calculation, the following rate
changes need to be made.
1997 Rates
1996 Rates
Increase
Area A
$31.50
$30.00
$1.50
Area B
$43.50
$42.00
$1.50
"-
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
,
DATE: December 17. 1996
)
Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
Jean D. McGann
AGENDA SECTION
ITEM NO.
REQUEST:
The Andover City Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution setting the 1997 budgets for the
Sewer, Water, Central Equipment and PIR Funds.
BACKGROUNDS:
"-
For the budget year 1997, there is an increase in the Water and Sewer rates as indicated in the 1997 Fee
Schedule.
/
The PIR (Permanent Improvement Revolving) Fund has expenditures in the amount of $31 0,000. The
funds are being proposed to be spent on office equipment forthe proposed new City Hall complex and
as a reserve for the future painting of the Andover Water Tower. The Water Tower will have to be
painted within approximately five years and City staff is recommending starting a sinking fund for this
project so as to avoid having to issue debt to make this approximately $350,000 expenditure.
The Central Equipment Fund has not changed significantly from the 1996 budget. Increased budgeted
amounts in some areas are reflections of having more equipment to service and having added an
additional full time mechanic in march of 1996.
\
)
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
,
RES. NO. R- 96
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1997 SPECIAL REVENUES FUND BUDGETS.
WHEREAS, the preparation and adoption of operating budgets is recognized a
sound financial practice; and
WHEREAS, the Special Revenue Funds were established to justify revenue
sources that finance particular functions or projects.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Andover hereby establishes the following Special Revenue Fund Budgets;
Drainage and Mapping
Lower Rum River
Forestry
Capital Equipment Reserve
Adopted by the Andover City Council on this 17th day of December, 1996.
CITY OF ANDOVER
J. E. McKelvey, Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria V olk, City Clerk
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
Revenue Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
12/6/963:06 PMDRAINMAP.XLS
DRAINAGE & MAPPING FUND SPECIAL REVENUE
Revenues
Revenue Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget
~ ~ 1lllM ~ ~ 1997
34136 Drainage Revenue $ - $ - $ 2,810.57 $ - $ 13,350.00
34137 Mapping Revenue - - 6,866.85 - 34,375.00
36210 Interest - - - - 700.00
I" ,.^. .~w__ ..~ . Subtotal . ''''$ ........ $ $ 9,677.42 $' $ "48,425:00
- - -
T" . ....- "T' .. . . l ..
~ - - liUUAl
Expenditures
Object Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget
~ 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
Improvement Proiects
201 General Office Supplies $ 446.49 $ 3,435.44 $ - $ - $ 5,000.00
210 Operating Supplies - 335.48 - - 1,500.00
301 Professional Services 3,195.25 3,467.37 - - 33,300.00
303 Consulting Eng. - General 8,831.71 2,391.96 1,756.81 - 5,000.00
330 Transportation 76.57 39.51 - - -
401 Inspections - 1,116.25 1,277.40 - -
416 Computer Services - - - - 2,125.00
433 Dues/Registrations - - 50.00 - -
580 Equipment - - - - 1,500.00
~....^.__ '_'~'W~'" ... SubtotaFr' .. "$'12,550.02 $ 10.786.0f $ 3,084.21 $ $ 48,425.00
-
T .
~ ~~~ ~ + ..
..
-'"~~- -
"",;>,-,,-_.,}:g,:&;.~;'j+", ' , - ," , "" ' ' , """'-~
J
/
\
/
/
Revenue
~
31010
31040
33402
36210
36260
~
Object
~
\, J
101
121
122
125
131
132
133
. .,
201
210
"
...
,
J
CITY OF ANDOVER 12/6/963:24 PMLOWERRUM.XLS
Revenue/Expenditure Budget Worksheet
BudQet Year 1997
LOWER RUM RIVER MGMT. DISTRICT ISPECIAL REVENUE
Revenues
I
I
i
i
Actual
~
Actual
~
Permits
General Property Tax
Fiscal Disparities
Homestead/Ag Credit
Interest
Refunds/Reimb.
. Subtotal
I" .
~
$ 10,491.22 i $
1,156.06
3,470.00 I
22.34 i
392.00 I
.'. I
15,531.62
9,020.36
3,102.55
3,474.66
35.31
649.62
16,282.50
I
'I"''''''.'
Expenditures
Actual
1993
Actual
1lllM
Personal Services
I
I
$ 8,645.00 I $
387.00
535.00 !
125.01
409.68
8,255.24
369.76
511.75
119.81
476.18
Salaries
PERA
FICA
Medicare
Health Insurance
Dental Insurance
Life Insurance
Actual
~
Budget
W.2
Budget
1997
$ 11,300.19
1,279.20
3,481.25
20.12
(649.62)1
15,431.14
I
$ 10,395.00 $
3,000.00
3,470.00
100.00
10,935
3,155
2,539
105
. 16,734
16,965.00 $
I
16;96sE ..
il34~
Actual
ll9.5
Budget
W.2
Budget
~
$ 9,258.22 $
405.62
500.33
117.01
521.60
9,544.00 $
428.00
592.00
138.00
498.00
9,742
436
604
141
521
49
20
11:514
3.551
"$ 10,105.24$
i
3.60 I 3.88 5.00
. 9;736.34$ 10,806.66 $ 11,205.00i"$
. .
-
303 Consulting Engineer
304 Attorney
Subtotal
I I
i Other Services and Charges
I
433 i Dues/Registrations $ - $ - I $ - $ - i $ -
454 I Lower Rum River 5304.76 5251.08 I 6998.40 I 4205.00 I 4205
Subtotal $ 5,304.76 $ 5,251.08 $ 6,998.40 $ 4,205.00 $ 4,205
i I! I i I
.'. ""rOT'<<'~I:XPEN[jlTUR'E~, ':l:'..." " $ -.UI;64M6Jr.$: ~'.1s;rm2.'l$.,.n:900:-27;::f7-1T,'<<5:01f":"~$ " .:--::r6;1~T
...;.:...;,:". '.....r...=- ..'..~; ""." "1='"'"" """"'''''i--'' .,......-- 'r .. ....... ...1'''.................. 'I.... ...... ......
ESS.OFREVENU~~-:".;:.~
."\ .'.9yE~~~P~N~..!U_
Supplies and Materials
General Office Supplies
Operating Supplies
Subtota'- ... ... ..
$
106.50 I $
13196.1.
238.4Er' . $'" ...... . ,..
r
- $
24 00
24.00 $
$
Purchased Services
$
i
- $ - $
- I 127.50 I
- $' .... '127.50$ ...
. . I
$
:
,
- $ - $ -
- 555 00 555
$ 555.00 $ ------c- 555
-
I
95.21 $ - $ -
- 1 000.00 460
95.21 $ 1,000.00 $ ... 460
I I ".-
:
! i
I
!
CITY OF ANDOVER 12/6/963:32 PMFORESTRYXLS
Revenue/Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
FORESTRY SPECIAL REVENUE FUND
"
,.~evenue Actual Actual Actual Budget Proposed
Code ~ 1lllM ~ 1996 1997
I KeVenUes
33422 Other Grants $ 20,000.00 $ 8,550.00 $ 7,040,00 $ - $ -
34122 Site Plan Review - Trees - i - - - 4,000,00
34144 Forestry Intern Fees - - - - 3,000.00
36210 Interest Earned 219 1,677 2,549 - 1,200.00
36260 Refunds & Reimbursements 1,119 2,360 179 - -
,jtfLUI I ransrers Trom orner Tunas 4, (UO - - - -
~D)'0:'i\i\i:;~.4J~'!\!j!iO',:I.!"i.!.QJ!.~;~~J~"\'!~~ ,V~~iU"'i ~2:586'55> ' ,'91768'37!'+'v"" ';C\~;!;';'0f{f!8~200;00~
, , ,__" .._ _1~'!'u:ti-i,h;;~',_.' ,/, - __~__ _-_._i_;'tdijtJi!i%,:;:;:'~~j{{\\;f;;fe
',bF -~i-'"
I t:xpendltures
Object Actual Actual Actual Budget Proposed
~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1997
I Personal Services
101 Salaries $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,000.00
121 PERA - - - - -
122 FICA - . - - 496.00
125 Medicare - - - - 1 16.00
131 Health Insurance - - - - -
132 Dental Insurance - - - - -
133 Life Insurance - - - - -
, . . $"" $"'H$' $ ..j.'.'. .
., ".' "'-' ......, .'~ ....... - . - $ 8,612:00
.... ... f -c< .
Supplies and Materials i
201 General Office Supplies $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500.00
210 Operating Supplies - - - 1"$" ' - 500 00
I, Subtotal ""~ . ''''$ $ $'" ;"/ '$"':'.1,000:00
I' - - - -
I,"" r _u,'._ " C.o'-,,,-' , -""--- H ,,-"
I Purchased Services
301 Professional Services $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
330 Transportation - - - - -
353 Publications - ! - - - 500.00
360 Insurance - I - - I - -
... Subtotal $ . .. ....- $ '. $ - $ .. ~... $ 500.00
I .' .
IOther Services and Charges
406 : Contractual Services $ 6,350,00 $ 8,550.00 $ 7,040.00 $ - $ 10,000.00
433 : Dues/Registrations - - I - - I 500.00
435 I Subscriptions i , I I 100.00
- I - - -
442 : Meals/Lodging i - I - I - I - I 100 00
Subtotal $ 6,350.00 $ 8,550.00$ 7,040.00 $ - .. $ 10,700.00
.': I . I i I
i ; I
I I i i
T"-:-:-"'''':-TOTAL EXPENDITU~ES'::,~~",~' ,$~F.';6;350:00~]'$.I'ii 8,550.00 "$; ;,7 ,040:60': '$'~-~~""":-$-~'20,812:OO'
/ ____;h~""""_";;_kJ""~=~~, ~ , 'Ji <'" > I~ ~m_ _._ '.~.. ._._.~_..___.__...J.klw::_^, ~,'~ ^' '''~;'''~''_-;';~--~--''''--'~-_._'''-*~''--' :"-:-:. '- ...._N. ..'..H.._....... ......~i{r-..'.^.~...--.d_... .___.."..'_."~' -- __..OM';'
! I! i I
t),'jY"C)YER)~Xe~~p):rU:~~.$\:\,1, .;;\".." '" ;. ;'L.;:; .. . ;,..,';..... ':'..12;61'2;00'
CITY OF ANDOVER 12/6/963:43 PMCAPEQUIP.xLS
Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT SPECIAL REVENUE
, ,
Revenue
~
Actual
~
Actual
~
Actual Budget
Wl5 I ~
Budget
1997
39201
Revenues
Transfer From Other Funds
..<:l.,......
,
$ - $ - $ -
$ . .. , $ -" $ . -
$
$
I
$364,800.00
$364,80():00
,
I
"-
j
I
Object
~
Actual
~
Actual
1994
Actual
1995
Budget
1996
Budget
1997
Expenditures
CaDital Outlay
550
580
Vehicle
'-'i"'t-''''''''''., _
$ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000.00
- - - - 89 000.00
'$ $ ^,^,..~ $ oO' $ ,..,.., '$109,000.00
- - - -
,".." .. I
.. .. "
. ,
I
,
I
$ - $ - $ - 1$
'$' $ - $ - $ -
I I -I i I I
(,;:..,"0..:"r ~.:~ ;TOTAl EXPENDITURES ri'$ .~~:.' >;./;,{.."$';,r,. ,.." _~.,;i ._I_:$"d;,~'i''-;~ ;.,;i:$::";:;';' t,.;;:::Jf$3552001jij''
~.,;.}.,rrq "I;"("'"" ,'."..:..-.;.:....."'..l,.:...m'..- '"h". ....., '-"j"" .... '. '. '.. ''I';.':' 'oO' . . ...: "1'.) L. :.::-.. .. ,y:... ,:,:....".:.::.-:t,oO ,.... .:
I_I
~~CESS(rF REVEN -., -., -::":~~:7--"::
. :',.::;; Y{.:~\(~R, E~P'~ND ,.:. ,... . .. ..' ., . . $ . 9.600:00'
Other Financing Uses
I'
720 Transfer To General Fund
'..' ....,..
$246,200.00
$246,200.00
I
, /
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -96
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE 1997 WATER FUND, SEWER FUND,
PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING FUND AND CENTRAL
EQUIPMENT FUND BUDGETS.
WHEREAS, the City of Andover Water and Sewer Funds are primarily supported
by user fees;
WHEREAS, the Central Equipment Fund is primarily supported by internal user
fees charges to operating departments of the City; and
WHEREAS, the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund was established to
provide for the acquisition of equipment of financing of improvement projects deemed
appropriate by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the preparation and adoption of operating budgets is recognized as
sound financial management for planning and monitoring financial condition; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of City of
Andover hereby established the 1997 budgets for the Water Fund, Sewer Fund,
Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund and the Central Equipment Fund.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 17th day of December, 1996.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey, Mayor
Victoria V olk, City Clerk
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
Revenue Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
12/9/962:25 PMSEWER.XLS
SEWER
I
34133 Sewer Dept. Fees $
36103 Assmt. - County
36110 Certified Bills
36210 Interest Earned
36211 Market Loss on Invest.
36230 Contributions
36260 Refunds & Reimburse.
I "".",""';7Tr'$ubtotiF";';'';';7T$''
38.10 48.00 -
29;365.39'""$"'E(1e9:02': $'31,047.39 '''$
Budget Proposed
~ 19H
- 1,000
- -
22,000.00 8,000
7,200.00 7,200
- -
- -
- -
29;20l):OO 16,200
.
Revenue
~
Actual Actual Actual
19.93 1lllM ~
- $ - $ 1,959.22 $
- - -
20,106.22 (662.33) 21,606.30
9,221.07 6,783.35 16,351.23
- - (8,869.36)
- - -
37210 Sewer Charges - Gen. $ 488,002.95 $ 542,342.40 $647,608.00 $ 665,000.00
37240 Sewer Charges - Other - 13,306.40 48,974.22 -
37260 Penalties - Sewer 9,749.57 11,115.27 11,222.22 11,000.00
:EE;'J:.J;'JJFJ~J','J.'JS~.b!~t~i,J~..1JJ;~E'1JS"~977~2.~2JCS.'."..566J764()7".'J~'70;r864'44' $ 676' 000 00..
719,785
6,500
. .. 72E>'285J
[mUH,
39204 Trans. Sewer Conn. $
,. - ,- ~,~., :'Subtotal~T~JZ77I~r:'$
....,.. ..... ..' T' ""...,..,. .. ...... d, ,...
~~7
- $
.:' "$'
- $ 30,500.00 $ 30,500.00 30,000
., "..,..",. $ 30;500:00' $ '30;500.00 ~30,OOO
-
"' .".h
/
3.09~~~S-76~~700(OO!.,i;.~'i'i".bn2;~8s;.
I
'\
,
I
CITY OF ANDOVER
Expenditure Budget Summary -
Budget Year 1997
12/9/962:27 PMSUMMARY.XLS
Sewer
'.
, /
Actual
~
Budget
~
Actual
~
Actual
1lllM
Sewer - DeDartment # 49490
Administration
Personal Services
Supplies and Materials
Purchased Services
Other Services and Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfer
..,..". ..., ....."TotafAdmlnlstraHon~..7"'$
$ 43,153.10 $ 43,341.63
1,712.48 764.27
4,466.05 5,409.37
264.43 5,555.88
- -
$ 28,929.00 $
1,800.00
7,775.00
2,900.00
1,800.00
7,590.00
..., $"SO;t94:00
$ 35,086.71
1 ,206.25
4,315.64
271.97
1,000.00
37,630.00
. 79;510:57
37,630.00 37,630.00
C $'S7,22S:otfT$T92,701:1S
'$' y~." 53,571"
'~:J<~ ,~.._;~"":iG~",~:"~~L~:~:Z;'_i~~__,,;':;_,"'''-;':'''~;_';'o:J,,,:,: ~;..~. _ _ n
, "
Collection
Personal Services $ 22,604.96 $ 30,097.07 $ 55,546.33 $ 91,276.00 $
Supplies and Materials 5,177.99 3,696.49 4,530.37 10,750.00
Purchased Services 351,624.47 365,700.69 425,768.43 526,960.00
Other Services and Charges 221,536.07 248,880.63 256,570.30 24,595.00
Capital Outlay (1,000.00) - - 31,125.00
':,...:......., "'"....'...Totargollectlon":c..?c."S.S99,943:4If"$'648;374:880"' $'....742;41S:433c'f"$6S4,IOS:nlf'$....
. ...:.'. ",."" 'r' . ""r ....." P "r' ,..",, . .., . "f' . ,.....,."....'"1'
~9i~i I _.. ~~~~_
;~
"~
\
)
Budget
1997
30,603
1,800
8,625
10,743
1,800
100,777
11,250
538,007
33,880
35,000
'T'T'718,914'
CITY OF ANDOVER
Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
12/9/962:25 PMSEWER.XLS
\
)
SEWER - COLLECTION DEPARTMENT # 49450 ENTERPRISE FUND
Object Actual , Actual Actual Budget Budget
~ ~ 1lllM ~ 1M6. 19.9Z
Personal Services
101 Salaries $ 18,724.51 $ 24,534.57 $ 44,420.49 $ 75,169.00 $ 78,658
121 PERA 679.55 1,009.16 2,108.99 3,332.00 3,524
122 FICA 1,264.19 1,550.35 2,703.30 4,660.00 4,877
125 Medicare 295.64 362.99 632.25 1,090.00 1,141
131 Health Insurance 1,629.06 2,622.42 5,647.96 7,000.00 6,826
132 Dental Insurance - - - - 534
133 Life Insurance 12.01 17.58 33.34 25.00 217
151 Workers Compensation - - - - 5,000
.. Subtotcil...._7,...cT.s.i.T..22.604:96.$ ...~..30;09t:01..$.'. 55,546.33 . $ 91;216:00:"$ m 100;171
~,...,~c~.~ "C" ".o_,~ '-"""^, ;c.",~".,_.,=.,_o,.~ f',."- "-',,i.i ,,_~."..',W.'_'~"_ ^ >,.~., .. _ ~._ '~_". ~._"., ....0._:.,.....' ~.._~ ,,^ ^ ~. ".. .. ..
Supplies and Materials
210 Operating Supplies 1,180.26 1,477.10 2,330.86 2,500.00 $ 3,000
212 Gas - Vehicle - - - - -
218 I Diesel Fuel - - - - -
220 Repair/Maint. - General 1,540.46 2,098.34 2,150.34 5,000.00 5,000
221 Repair/Maint. -Veh. - - - - -
224 Repair/Maint. - Streets 2,124.47 - - 2,500.00 2,500
240 Small Tools 332.80 121 05 4917 750 00 750
Subtot8f....... .....<,."."0.,.,"",.".>>" $"'; . 5;111.99 $' . . '3;696049 '$ . 4,530.37 $ 10,750.00' $ 11,250
,_.,,"~,...., c.,_",_,.."-""",,, ."i>'"",,;;.:~,,,.;;>4;;>'; "'~:~'-'="--""'--;";"" ".~.." .",",- ,,~ ',.:,"_...'""", ..
Purchased Services
303 Consulting Engineer - 618.32 - 8,500.00 $ 8,500
314 Gopher One-State Call 853.87 317.99 308.02 500.00 700
316 Contractual Sewer Syste 280.00 685.00 - 5,000.00 5,000
321 Telephone - - - 300.00 300
360 Insurance 736.00 794.00 1,900.00 1,960.00 2,100
381 I Electric 295.60 405.38 439.41 500.00 500
385 ..1 Metro Waste..Control.c;om 349 459 00 362 880.00 423 121.00 510200.00 I 520 907
... Subto.tal" .... $ 351,624.47 $ ,. 365,700.69 $ 425,768.43 $ 526,960.00:$ 538,007
....
)
CITY OF ANDOVER
Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
12/9/962:25 PMSEWER.XLS
J
Object Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget
~ ~ 1lllM ~ ~ 1i9I
Other Services and Charges
401 Repair/Maint. - General $ 1,571.14 $ 6,594.47 $ 1,917.50 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000
403 Repair/Maint. - Streets - - 718.00 845.00 2,000
404 Repair/Maint. - Impr 190.00 - - 2,000.00 2,000
405 Repair/Maint. - Vehicle - - - - -
410 Rentals 18.43 - 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000
415 Equipment Services 7,480.00 10,000.00 16,000.00 16,000.00 24,130
420 Depreciation 211,936.50 231,704.72 236,427.80 - -
433 Dues/Registrations 340.00 581.44 507.00 750.00 750
499 Contingency - - - - -
"........' ;".'~~77SuTitotiI7;;tij'rTrr'rJ)$'.'F221',53l)';01'~T$"24g;880~63'.j$"'T256;51'0:30J'. $....... 24;595:00~...$'.." 33,880
.. o,'.,~,:: '.".":t.\",,'."''''"~;':;~_'~' ,"',>"o':.>",..);c",ii~"," ".:~< ~,- ...-. ._._~.,..- . ~. '."", .. .-.--- ~--"",._.._,._~.". '".-~.<<,.,"._..._,--~,,_..,..,' .;,~-~-;. ,,- -'c....,., w,,__. . . .-.
CaDital Outlay
570 Office Equipment -$ 1,000.00 $ - $ - $ 750.00 $ 750
580 Equipment - - - 20,375.00 24,250
582 Capital Maintenance Res - - - 10,000.00 10,000
..7..,..... .' j-j 1.'<..'......... '. ':$",/1'nnnnn .$ ....... ..... ~..,$..... ...,.../"" ../$ /31.125.00"':$T^""~I;;~
..' ...,L:.. ....... - .... ........
~ ~ , .~
J
"
. /
CITY OF ANDOVER
Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
12/9/962:25 PMSEWER.XLS
>
SEWER - ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT # 49450 ENTERPRISE FUND
Object Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget
~ ~ 1lllM ~ ~ ~
Personal Services
101 Salaries $ 29,070.96 $ 35,959.87 $ 36,649.78 $ 23,795.00 $ 25,243
121 PERA 1,347.29 1,611.17 1,586.90 1,066.00 1,131
122 FICA 1,808.53 2,123.15 2,118.97 1,475.00 1,565
125 Medicare 422.90 496.59 495.66 345.00 366
131 Health Insurance 2,420.62 2,940.71 2,471.10 2,241.00 2,090
132 Dental Insurance - - - - 148
133 Life Insurance 16.41 21.61 19.22 7.00 60
-~,.".,~.,.... -, - ^~o>
... SubtotafC' 7 , ""T~1"$'t'35,oa6:tf/$F43,153TfO ' $ 43,341.63. $ '28;92IfOlj'j[ij$"? . 30,603
,"', ~._;',.;',~.;,.,~.,",,'" ".' ,,',0; ;o.f""_"-",,:..,,,,,''''.w''", .,',__,"..._n_ "'"- '~',"" .. C__..,"
Supplies and Materials
201 General Office Supplies $ 1,006.25 $ 1 ,712.48 $ 764.27 $ 1 ,500.00 $ 1,500
210 Operating Supplies 200.00 - - 200.00 200
220 Repair/Maint. - General - - - 100.00 100
Subtotal "-"~ ,- -""",,,,,,,,,,,,,=,,-"""-'-,"~ '$"',"1:206.25/ '$~'" 't,712:48.....$...,',..r.....r764:27'.'$. 1:800.06 $.... 1:800'
...,..,"'."'-~,"".~.,. ;- '~."~';o.."~::";.;,,,,,~,::~:.,::,,,,,,,,,,,-,,,,,,,,,,_~,,,,-",,.~:~.,,,-,,.~.~,, ._O'...;""'.'-'.....~,~".,.~ .,.- ,..."""",,~~, .'~,'-..,,-,_.,- "_n.' ..._- -";"_"""'-'W ..._"''"._.,,',>>..',_.,.v..~.c "'-'--'-Y'-' ,-.,,,~,.; ~'...<<o,.;_''''y --._" .~
Purchased Services
301 Professional Services $ 2,001.11 $ 1,978.00 $ 2,730.58 $ 3,600.00 $ 5,000
303 Consulting Engineer - - - 200.00 250
322 Postage 1,650.35 1,657.50 1,844.49 2,225.00 2,225
330 Transportation 106.58 289.55 215.10 600.00 600
351 Publishing 97.60 - 19.20 400.00 400
352 Printing - - - 150.00 150
360 Insurance 460.00 541.00 600.00 600.00 600
."T..' 'SutitotalTT . '?'.. ',.'7$'" .' 4,315.64 $'"? 4,466.05' $ ~~'..._, 5:409.37' $ 7,775.00 $' ,.. a;625
",' .~.,""-- '. ,-,,- "-"'" ''''''I'' ' .. ,', .~ , .... ' ....
Other Services and Charges
401 Repair/Maint. - General $ 64.47 $ 46.93 $ 47.68 $ 300.00 I $ 300
406 Contractual Services - - 5,386.70 1,000.00 7,000
410 I Rentals - - - - I -
416 I Computer Services - - - - 1,743
433 Dues/Registrations 207.50 217.50 121.50 - 100
442 I Meals/Lodging I - - - I 100.00 100
499 I Contingency ! - I - - I 1,500.00 1,500
I I
\
/
"
CITY OF ANDOVER
Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
12/9/962:25 PMSEWER.XLS
Subtotal
Actual Actual Actual Budget
~ 1lllM ~ jll2
$ 271.97 $ 264.43 $ 5,555.88 $ 2,900.00
,- ;.<.."-~..,.,,,-
/
Capital Outlay
$
$
$
$
712 Transfer - Cert of Indebt 37,630.00
727 Transfer to Other Funds
........ '.' -. ..' Subtotal~-::.~~.'~':~.~:~:~.:$'-::'37;630.Q(j
37,630.00
37,630.00
7,590.00 $
"$ -37:63Cfoif '$'"'~' 37,630.00" "$" -. '7:590.00 .. $'-.... .
"TOTAU~DMINISTRATiot'r"'-' $~79,510:S1~i~$ .87:22€fOEf'$~""792:n5f.15' ~$:'50:794:00 : $' '53,51f
r-,
". )
"
CITY OF ANDOVER
Revenue Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
12/9/961:57 PMWATER.XLS
,
/
WATER
Revenue Actual Actual Actual Budget Proposed
~ ~ 1lllM 1>>5 ft9.6 1997
341 32 Water Dept. Fees $ - $ - $ 3, 1 03.83 $ - 3,500
361 1 0 Certified Bills - - - - -
3621 0 Interest Earned 16,201 .92 1 6,773.79 43,051 .65 14,000.00 1 4,000
3621 1 Market Loss on Invest. - - (25, 1 68.83) - -
36230 Contributions - - - - -
36245 Sale of Used Equip. - - - - -
36260 Refunds & Reimburse. 3,616.48 3,744.01 25.00 - -
~~.~, '"'"co',.."7..'"...., S""bt .., ....r...~....~.,~....~.$'..~".f98f840.. '$"''' 20,517:80',,$ ....2..1;Of'l.65'j$'..'14;OOO:OO "'CT" "17;500
..,................... U ota....'..'."', .
-...'''-c. .-CC.,.,"".~.,_........~~."'",.~" .. ..., "."" _. ",....,~..,.......,c<.. co, ....... ~.~~_".__v .>",v'__m .. .~--_....._',-~ w..__."".,c",...____, _~.."J."";',,< ,,,,,-,_,.._,_ v.._w."'-" ""-- -,'. ,..__-.c~_wC_..~'N..."..._.,_.; ~-'-"
371 1 0 Water Sales-General $ 275,583.96 $ 406,371 .08 $448,252.22 $ 440,000.00 539,400
37140 Water Dis/Reconnect - 25.00 - - -
371 50 Water Permit Fees 22,982.50 1 8,200.00 1 3,600.00 1 5,000.00 1 2,000
371 52 Other Fees - Water 965.00 365.00 1 05.00 - -
371 60 Penalties - Water 5,681 .1 8 8, 1 63.95 7,081 .95 - -
371 70 Hydrant Rentals 65.00 - - - -
371 71 Meters 53,935.00 48,238.00 44,723.20 45,000.00 30,000
--.. -,..-~-, ....,. .'....,'T"......'.'..siJbtotal....?...,..Y"'S"'!r..3"t'59..2'1264""'$"'481'363:03'["$513'76237''''''$'.'500000'00T.'.'.'" "'''S81"40tf
~',' ......,...............".. "'h"'~""~"""T"" . ... ... .. .. . . .. ... .... .... ... .. ............,
r-<< .~.9,Q31if! .1f501;880;83y~f,~$~34.''l'l4-:O ':~ii> .. 'OOOMO;W Th\.TT~h*'?.!'R.5~8,~OO.1
I
CITY OF ANDOVER 12/9/962:27 PMSUMMARy.xLS
Expenditure Budget Summary - Water
Budget Year 1997
)
Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget
1m ruM ~ ~ ~
Water - Department # 49490
Source, Storage, & Treatment
Supplies and Materials $ 16,238.71 I $ 17,670.10 $ 17,622.27 $ 22,100.00 $ 27,800
Purchased Services 31,093.70 34,868.94 38,609.42 40,600.00 43,400
Other Services and Charges 22,703.42 3,390.89 3,771 .84 35,000.00 35,000
I Capital Outlay 5,101.17 - - 31,000.00 77,000
,-,- Total'Soliree; Stofci1ie'etc: "'7 $7"'75,137:00 $" 55,929.93' .$ , 60,003.53 $128,700.00 $ 183,200
;,.-'", _,--,.~"",^'.";_"c,_"'.""~,c,._c,_,",~,,,,"',,,,"".,,,'_" I ......._~_._..
Distribution
Personal Services $ 85,394.54 $ 88,053.66 $ 104,838.23 $ 94,680.00 $ 101 ,319
Supplies and Materials 9,835.12 12,004.77 8,062.59 18,300.00 19,500
Purchased Services 2,593.93 I 3,355.92 3,565.55 6,150.00 7,650
Other Services and Charges 202,475.02 219,662.21 258,394.18 19,600.00 27,673
l;apltal outlay 46-;84{[75 270.00 - 81,075.00 104,80lf
'''''''=~''~'''~"''-''"'N''''_ ....Total Distiib'lltion or""',, ,'( ',";'$ 347;139:36' '$~r323;346:56'<'$314;86lr.55 $219;805:00"$ '260;9'42'
-....- c._~..._..'_._",~ ~,' ,';~~C';;""""".,"'''':.''.,._,''_''h< h"",".~"_' ... -",-d.. h'" -,' .,",~,,~., ,"'"
Administration
Personal Services $ 35,855.57 $ 43,532.82 $ 43,424.37 $ 28,929.00 $ 30,615
Supplies and Materials 1,172.05 2,000.90 517.81 1 ,900.00 2,200
Purchased Services 14,526.68 17,670.73 20,848.41 36,350.00 19,600
Other Services and Charges 708.98 709.55 3,956.70 41,576.00 44,643
Capital Outlay - - 159.74 1 ,700.00 1 ,700
Transfers 20,000.00 20,000.00 - 55,040.00 56,000
~,.t"rotaIAdiniriistfcitiori;''''n'F$'" 72;263:28' $'F' 83,914.00 $'68,907.03 $ 165,495:00F'$ " 154,758'
""-- ' _- ki,=,,;, .,.",>, +:J;__,. .. _,,;,,'_'.' .::~ :,~,";"~,:'~:,.::';;,;C',';;;:",:, <'=;,":"",~);__"'~;3;~,C.,:,,;:,"~"""O.,,, ""'_".,,,,~ ,^,",^,"._ ,um """,,,..",-,,.."^,',^ .."''''; """ .~^ w"''', .:,. .;",....,,,-,,,cC" 'o~""" ^_"'''.
~i~}1f'}i}23:,~@i!;ji;': Grana;totllrWllteri~.4""!'i}4!).u$~'il!!"iC94iS39:6'4-"$];!i463'190'(49,,'J'$503'j'7,1"111.'Gz'$rS14' OOOOO'i!~i$j:iiit598;900)
'-!'""~'.Cf:'pid:;~;;~d,""~':nt. . . ..' .. ...'^, "..- _. _'>'.. . .". .... ...."';.. ;~~i!lffif~++ii'Hjl ,"i+-jih".-...- . ..L .J . . . ,.. ~ '-". .~-,,-.., <:'7..... t, . -- ": ". .fi~' . .,..... .... . .J.- ..' .ir",'lIo., ".>t.,.-".. ,,: ., .- . '. ., .. . ..- .-' ..".~,..,.. .. >p,-;.,:~ --.- -- ,. .' .',. >-
"
j
12/9/961:54 PMWATER.XLS
CITY OF ANDOVER
Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
)
WATER-SOURCE STORAGE
DEPARTMENT #
Object
Code
\
"
Actual
~
Supplies and Materials
201
210
216
227
General Office Supplies
Operating Supplies
Chemicals
Repar/Maint. - System
,. . Subtotal" ." 'T .',
$ 55.07 $
853.13
14,603.38
727.13
$ -16,238.71' $
49400
ENTERPRISE FUND
Budget
1997
500
1,800
23,000
2500
'27,800
2,500
1,300
500
2,800
32,000
2,000
2300
... 43,40b'
401 Repair/Maint. - General $ 1,407.00 $ 1,367.50 $ 2,848.37 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000
402 Repair/Maint. - Building 600.81 442.72 162.50 I 2,000.00 2,000
403 Repair/Maint. - Well/Pump. 20,000.00 245.17 - 25,000.00 25,000
404 Repair/Maint. - Improvements 307.61 806.00 324.00 2,500.00 2,500
406 Contractual Services - - - 500.00 500
433 Dues/Registrations 388.00 529 50 436.97 1 000.00 1 000
I"", Subtotal "^","'''''':>-., ,.~ ,..-..., ." $ 22,703.42 '$ :3,390.89 . ":$ '3,771.84 $'35,000.00 '$ ,,,.-' 35,000'
_"'w. ,...:'-.-' ,',:n -".---'~-"^'---- = .,....-..., ,..~- ,.:...~_._w ~"., ',' --,-. .., I _""',_"',y,'__w_, ,. "." -~-,^
Capital Outlay
Purchased Services
301
315
321
360
381
383
386
Professional Services $
Professional Service - Lab
Telephone
Insurance
Electric
Natural Gas
Water Permit - DNR
Subtotal'.' c'."...,"...:.:'r.'C?zc:-..:-.T,,....$
- $
230.00
24.90
1,939.00
26,898.67
1,050.13
951 00
"3UI93.10"'$
Actual
1lllM
Actual
~
Budget
~
12,000
65,000
2,831.23 - - i
2,269.94 I - -
$ 5,101.17 $ -'" $-
r I' :
: I I I i
Fa~'.:g0.....q!~~s.q~,B9,~;.~.I2a!~~~3:l~I.;~~$..f:75;13"l:00.fi;.$.~:1~5.55:929:93:~:j$h.60,003.53;11$128;700.00':;3$\: ,(:.:J:183,200 ,
Other Services and Charges
580 Equipment
582 Capital Maintenance Res.
603 IAssessment Principal
613 IAssessmentlnterest
Subtotal' ,
$
I
I
- I $ 500.00 $
1,041.19 1,600.00
13,016.54 17,500.00
3 564 54 2 500 00
, $ 17,622.27 $ 22,100.00$
I
25.68 $
401.21
16,034.09
1 209 12
17,670.10
179.74 $ 200.00 $ 2,000.00 $
444.00 630.00 800.00
868.17 - 500.00
2,474.00 2,500.00 2,600.00
29,529.82 32,398.06 30,000.00
1,373.21 1,418.94 1,700.00
- 1 462 42 3 000 00
"'34,868.94":$'r38,S09.42.,r'$'J40,600:00 '$
$
$
I $ 6,000.00 $
I 25,000,00
I
,
$ 31,000.00 $
'[
77,000
CITY OF ANDOVER
Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
12/9/961:54 PMWATER.XLS
/
WATER-DISTRIBUTION DEPARTMENT # 49430 I ENTERPRISE FUND
Object Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget
~ ~ 1lllM ~ ~ 1997
Personal Services
101 Salaries $ 71,724.10 $ 73,112.98 $ 86,260.21 $ 77,965.00 $ 78,658
121 PERA 2,892.92 3,112.09 3,841.04 3,493.00 3,524
122 FICA 4,529.10 I 4,487.09 5,178.04 4,834.00 4,877
125 Medicare 1,059.17 1,049.78 1,211.00 1,131.00 1,141
131 Health Insurance 5,146.93 6,244.44 8,297.20 7,225.00 7,296
132 Dental Insurance - - - - 585
133 Life Insurance 42.32 47.28 50.74 32.00 238
151 Workers Compensation - - - - 5,000
" . Subtotal" ~.. ~.~ $ 85,394.54 $ "88,053.66 $104.838.23 $ 94,680'00 $ '101,318.90
__......N....'._.._. c_c_~.C"":""""'_"'.O'_''''';_'''_'~',''_C'-'''-''..~., . " I" '0. . .
Supplies and Materials
201 General Office Supplies $ 253.56 $ 193.17 $ 237.95 $ 300.00 $ 300
210 Operating Supplies 4,700.51 3,795.82 3,584.52 4,500.00 4,500
214 Meter Repair Supplies 480.01 909.62 181.06 2,000.00 3,200
219 Hydrant Repair Supplies 916.00 1,015.20 790.51 2,500.00 2,500
220 Repair/Maint. - General 1,633.38 I 4,794.55 1,829.18 3,000.00 3,000
224 Repair/Maint. - Streets 1,218.45 - 398.04 3,000.00 3,000
227 Repair/Maint. - System 633211 1 296 41 1 041 33 3 000 00 3000
., ,.,.,""".-, . 'Subtotal'. ,,' , ".":::' "'i$ ,.. "'9,835:12, ..,'. $ >12,004.77:$' "8,062'59 $ '18,300:00' $ ..'..'<19;500.
'u"', .'.," -,....,.'....",..'- i I 'O.
Purchased Services I I
301 Professional Services $ - i$ - $ - I $ - $ 100
303 Consulting Engineer - I - - I 500.00 500
I
314 Gopher One-State Call 853.88 I 327.26 306.23 I 500.00 700
I
321 Telephone 114.18 126.48 160.51 500.00 500
322 Postage 20.37 416.03 50.99 50.00 1,000
351 Publishing 111.50 210.59 47.82 1,500.00 1,500
360 Insurance 1 494 00 2 275 56 3 000 00 3 10000 3350
Subtot.ll'7 . ~.. .~""\,,,., ,- $ "2,593:93 $ ", 3;355.92' $' '3,565'55 $ e,15(J:OO ,"$' 7,65()
'-'0' ~ "f:;;; ''''''''1' ~, - '" I "[ , ,,' "-~.,~
Other Services and Charges
401 Repair/Maint. - General $ 220.00 ! $ 1,698.27 $ 1,205.00 I $ 800.00 $ 800
403 Repair/Maint. - Streets - I - 1,317.00 I 1,000.00 1,000
I I
407 Meters - Labor 372.75 I - - 500.00 700
408 Hydrants - Labor - I - - ! 500.00 500
,
410 Rentals 474.56 - 37.61 i 700.00 700
415 I Equipment Services 5,375.00 8,000.00 15,075,00 15,100.00 22,773
420 Depreciation I 195,640.06 , 209,328.16 240,096.57 - -
I I
433 I Dues/Registrations I 392.65 . 635.78 663.00 I 1,000.00 1,000
442 i Meals/Lodging I - - - I - 200
Subtotal $ 202,475.02 $219,662.21 $ 258,394.18 $ 19,600.00 $ 27,673
I I I
I ! I
Object
~
)
560
580
581
Capital Outlay
Furniture
Equipment
Meters/Horns
. ':'Siibtotar~'~-~"T ,"..
1 "~," ........ ..... H ,,,,,
12/9/961:54 PMWATER.XLS
CITY OF ANDOVER
Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
Actual
~
Actual
~
Actual
1lllM
$ 328.85 -$ 328.85 $
4,140.06
42,371.84 598.85
"$"'46;840.757$"". r:Z7IfOO"$"
'I' ..nT' ,..."....,. ""'1
...".:...._..T...'$.
I.'.'
...- --,
\. /
Budget
~
$
500.00 $
19,275.00
61,300.00
81,'075:00'.$
.. .T'
Budget
.wIT
500
43,000
61,300
104,8Cj(r
;i- ^
CITY OF ANDOVER
Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
12/9/961:54 PMWATER.XLS
,
WA TER-ADMINISTRA TION DEPARTMENT # 49440 ENTERPRISE FUND
Object Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget
~ ~ 1lllM ~ 199.6 1m
Personal Services
101 Salaries $ 29,674.84 $ 36,276.33 $ 36,719.17 $ 23,795.00 $ 25,243
121 PERA 1,374.45 1,625.26 1,590.06 1,066.00 1,131
122 FICA 1,845.83 i 2,142.43 2,122.75 1,475.00 1,565
125 Medicare 431.60 501.03 496.50 345.00 366
131 Health Insurance 2,511.76 2,965.99 2,476.57 2,245.00 2,090
132 Dental Insurance - - - - 160
133 Life Insurance 17.09 21.78 19.32 3.00 60
151 Workers Compensation - - - - -
~c" ",'y" , Su6total..."',."....'.......'.'..T.'.7.."...."$ "..""35,855:57',.".'..$.'." "43;532:82 '"$'43,424:37 ,$" 28,929:00 .,.. ,", 30,615
$
" '-,..'~"'>' ,~_,.".~".,_."'_:"'"C~,~"'_:~;.C,,,'_: ,cO ___T._.~""" '.: ,,~ - -"-~
Supplies and Materials
201 General Office Supplies $ 623.77 $ 1,186.81 $ 477.81 $ 700.00 $ 700
210 Operating Supplies 463.08 814.09 40.00 1,000.00 1,000
220 Repair/Maint. - General 85.20 - - 200.00 500
,., '..:< ~:":_' ,... _, ""'~"'" .'........ ~.: ..:.~:,~..,.___.:. ,..,._.^'..,.."~_."",.~,,,....-,:.:.""'.,.."',...._._"'.'_:~_"',.'"". "~',_ ,,', '._ ~"'>"_ """"",.,,,v... '~_'_"".'.,~_'". Yo.'" ,.... ,"_ .y'..... .......,"'_/'..._.._~__.,,' '511:817\'$'") . ';1;900:00' $.... '2,20Cf
'. Subtotal.." '.'.,."'...,'.'</(...$.,1.172.05$\..2,000.90 '..'.$ ',,'
, '" '.',., ,--~ i _"" .,:;_,-~,....., ,~,.:._.,-,_.- .-,...-,-,.-.-," . .. .-'-'
Purchased Services
301 Professional Services $ 2,001.11 $ 1,978.00 $ 2,466.39 $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000
303 Consulting Engineer - - - 200.00 200
322 Postage 1,352.19 1,969.82 2,037.64 1,800.00 2,000
330 Transportation 106.58 239.00 204.46 200.00 200
351 Publishing 48.80 82.91 19.20 600.00 600
352 Printing - - - 100.00 100
353 Publishing - - 299.00 500.00 500
360 Insurance 826.00 981.00 1,000.00 1,300.00 1 ,400
386 Water Quality Fee 10,192.00 12,420.00 14,246.00 15,000.00 15,000
390 Taxes - - 575 72 650 00 650
I, ,..',".'., Subtotal . ,..'S:-"."o'T$ "'14,526:68 $' '17,670:13 $20;848:41' $ .',' '36,350.00 $' ,.,_,.,,'_n 19',600'
I -c_..",^,,-,,_~-_,.,~ .. ""'OW
! Other Services and Charges
401 Repair/Maint. - General $ 138.06 $ 46.93 $ 47.68 $ 300.00 $ 650
406 Contractual Services 363.42 I 356.25 3,750.52 17,000.00 17,000
410 Rentals - i - - 450.00 I 450
416 I Computer Services - - - - 1,743
433 Dues/Registrations 207.50 279.45 158.50 500.00 500
442 : Meals/Lodging - 26.92 - 300.00 I 300
,
499 ! Contingency - I - - 23,026.00 , 24,000
-c I i
Subtotal $ 708.98 $ 709.55 $ 3,956.70 $ 41,576.00 $ 44,643
I I ! I
.
Capital Outlay ! i
1 I
560 ' Furniture $ - . $ - $ 159.74 i $ 500.00 t $ 500
570 ,Office Equipment - I - - I 1,200.00 I 1,200
\
)
"
J
CITY OF ANDOVER
Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
12/9/961:54 PMWATER.XLS
Transfers
720 Transfer to Computer Reserv 20,000.00 20,000.00
727 Transfer to Other Funds
,""'"r~"Su6totar""'" <"'$~"'20,000:00'$20;0Q(j.OO' "$'''''''''::'
, " ,p, r' ".." ""'''' , , , ,""", """,,,,,,,,',,.. '""1 ' ,"'" '" 'T " ..' , roo "
25,000.00 $
30,040.00
, 55;040:00 '$
.. r
25,000
31,000
". 56:000
~,
\.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Revenue/Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
12/9/962:33 PMCENTEQ.XLS
CENTRAL EQUIPMENT FUND
-,
,
Revenues
Revenue Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget
~ 1m 1lllM ~ ~ ~
Charges for Services
38400 Equipment Rental $ 143,948.00 $ 166,770.00 $ 187,800.00 $205,880.00 $ 310,500
I' " Siibtcital ,__","_'"..'N,~",,''' $ -'143,948.00 - ;$ 166,77():00 -'-$ - 187,800:00 '$20S,880:OO --$- 310:s00-
, N'~"~.";"~""'. "'o..-~~,<,.___,_,~ _..e~ -- -- --~"~
Miscellaneous Revenue
36210 Interest Earnings $ 3,757.00 $ 925.00 $ 581.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 616
", ",,' ',' ,,"' . =- '" ,rr;;$'. '.3,757.00'$.-' ~;'$"-'.'."""""'" ,S81.00 '$' "'., .$.,""T" '616
'"", "..",.., :-;,',- -, ---=-
"S'-TOT AI.: REVENUEs"rr , ';'"'CYT7Y$:'r1'47;70S]10",1'$167;69S:00:,] $",,188:381 :00'" $208,08():00"'<'$..-;"\"'-;'31'1;U6"
~.~,.",...""-,,, ~ ,~~__,',.__"",,^,,",<,:i"'..';;;;'i~_.',",,h.,._'.',_,,,,,____, ;'" r
, Expenditures
\ ,
Object Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget
~ 1m ~ 1995 1996 1997
Personal Services
101 Salaries $ 26,531.74 $ 35,689.54 $ 48,386.60 $ 37,130,00 $ 77,095
121 PERA 1,169.17 1,597.00 1,881.77 1,663.00 3,454
122 FICA 1,718.18 2,244.46 2,697.76 2,302.00 4,780
125 Medicare 401.85 525.20 630.90 538.00 1,118
131 Health Insurance 2,827.86 3,898.88 4,358.50 4,094.00 7,600
132 Dental Insurance - - - - 517
133 Life Insurance 18.29 22.92 23.31 33.00 210
---"-'-~-" ,- .~. - .~ " Subtotal '~.,x,~ - ~ =-~,",._,' $":32,667.09' $ 43,978:00 $ - 57,978:84 - $ 45,760.00" $ 94m3
Supplies and Materials
201 I General Office Supplies $ 19.65 $ 1.99 $ - $ 100.00 $ 200
210 I Operating Supplies 3,536.10 3,912.08 6,626.49 5,100.00 5,100
212 IGas - Vehicle 9,766.53 7,956.66 9,065.98 15,000.00 I 15,000
218 !Diesel Fuel 15,884,46 21,469.62 22,719.54 25,000.00 I 25,000
220 ' Repair/Maint. - General 497.57 - 453.34 500.00 ! 500
221 I Repair/Maint. - Vehicle 25,741.44 I 46,147.49 64,279.43 45,000.00 I 50,000
, 240 iSmall Tools 1,764.41 I 1,295.99 1,426.97 2,000.00 I 3,500
Subtotal $ 57,210.16 $ 80,783.83 $ 104,571.75 $ 92,700.00$ 99,300
I I T I I I I ,
CITY OF ANDOVER
Revenue/Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
12/9/962:33 PMCENTEQ.XLS
Object
~
/ Purchased Services
Actual
19a3
Actual
1994
Budget
~
Budget
WIT
$ 17,354.49 $ 20,218.00 $
14,838.73 18,439.16 20,000.00
., "'_$'32,193;22Z'r$~".38.,651.16'T$"20.000:0IF$'.'7
'."'..'.."T'..". ,....",.... ,.~."."'r " ."r'" r ' '"I I
"'10TALEX~ENDITURES,...T..7"$'.125/i.65:86]$'r199;452:76:'l;'239;:.w:aS"$268;680.66 '$"7"
,...."'1"'.."11' r I
550 Vehicles
,580 Equipment
\
"':,,', ,'" ''''subfotiir''
334
360
361
401
405
406
409
410
433
499
Actual
~
Vehicle License $ $
Insurance 16,603.00
Insurance Deductibles
"Subtotil"'T'"''"'''''E7$' 16,603;00'$
$ 39.50 $ 600.00 $
22,286:00 19,100.00
$ '";22,325.50 $ 19,700.00 $'
650
37,221
37,811
445.50
15,195.00
500 00
16;140:50
Other Services and Charges
Repair/Maint. - General $
Repair/Maint. - Vehicle
Contractual Services
Inspections/Emissions Test
Rentals
Dues/Registration
Contingency
" " Slibtotal'''')c..,\'''.....',.$''
73.34 $
18,135.27
350.00
72.00
$
$
15,441.90 24,000.00
1,000.00
80.00 120.00
$
25,325.15
575.00
80.00
24,000
1,000
150
500
2,500
4422
"32;512'
55.00 377.00 387.50 2,100.00
2 700 00
"18;685:61'" $" 26;357:15""$"" :1!'i;909:4If'$ " 29;920:00" $""'"
"'"",;,",.0"',_,"-,,",,_'''''_' .". -< '~'.' ",e.,","".;;" .."",,;;o;_,,~,; ~..,...,~,'-""<;._. "'''''_~'
~,_,.' ..'-'_"''-'_'~>'~'' . . ,",,,,,,...,, " ",_.y.'-_.' c~. . c.-','.. ""'_,~~'" S'" ....;c.N..."'_._"."..,...<_'-_~. ~.c"""."...,"~,_.,.c,' ..<.C~_c_",,,,^ ""'.~. ','_C,.__," __.", '_', _ .~,^,~ '~',",,_w~.~~",,-,O""'; "..c..,'
Capital Outlay
$
$
12,000
34,600
46;€lOQ,
. .. ,. ,,'",':' .. ....,.. $' ..
',' 311J16
CITY OF ANDOVER
Revenue/Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
12/9/962:56 PMPIR.XLS
\
PERM. IMP. REVOLV. CAPITAL PROJECT
Revenues
Revenue Actual Actual Actual Budget Proposed
~ ~ 1lllM 1m ~ 1m
36101 Assmt. Prin. - City $ 63,234.00 $ 91,244.17 $ 91,281.23 $ 40,000.00 $ 190,000.00
36102 Assmt. Int. - City 9,498.73 9,278.33 8,846.88 - 10,000.00
36103 Assmt. - County 69,250.01 88,862.88 80,549.23 80,000.00 50,000.00
36104 Assmt. - County - Del. 3,558.98 6,286.84 1,622.67 - 1,000.00
36210 Interest Eamed 37,898.09 20,767.50 66,815.77 20,000.00 59,000.00
36260 Refunds & Reimbursement - - - - -
I' Subtotal ~..~w $183,439.81 ' $ 216,439.72 $ 249,115.18 $. '140;000: (j(j '$ .,'...310,000.00
^.".",",.,'" ,.>-, ~ w_' ^ ,', "''''-'''~'''''^
39201 Transfers from other funds $ 31,401.06 $ 20,000.00 $ - $ - $ -
39202 Residual Equity Transfer - - 2,377,951.60 - -
'u, '_V'~_"_ " Subtotal ,."~",,",,," $31,401:06"$ 20.000:00' ,$2;377,951.60 " "$'" ,."', '.:'7'$ <"~"'-"""'"""-' ,.......-.,
-
, """""1..' ,....",..." "''''d, .. ,. u "r T "'\" . "'1 1
~Q, , , 6 ,-,." Z;(JU!,,9,' I.iQ~4jJ~~~~i,i,10;(JOQiQ.O~
Expenditures
Object Actual Actual Actual Budget Proposed
~ 1993 1994 1ill ~ 1997
CaDital Outlay
530 Improvements $ - $ 23,506.30 $ 7,240.27 $ -
532 Overlays - - - - 200,000.00
570 Office Equipment - 11,809.47 - -
580 Equipment 50,342.78 23,452.55 I - 1 10,000.00 110,000.00
Subtotal .''''''' $ 50,342.78 $ 58,768:32 .,.". $ ',' 7,240.27 '$ '110,000.00 $ .' ' 31 O,OOO.C)()
.. .. ,~",.," ;'~""-"" ,-""'...".,." .. .,," -<....,~,._,-,.,-,,~"",".,
Public Improvements
303 Consulting Engineer 3,037.16 - - -
304 Attomey - 205.00 - -
351 Publishing - 47.06 - -
401 Inspections - - 978.15 -
406 Contractual Services 19,464.80 I - - -
570 Office Equipment - - 107,441.02 -
580 Equipment - - 13,793.63 30,000.00
711 Transfer to Debt Service 452,544.42 - I -
810 I Refunds/Reimbursents 15,175.00 - I I -
~..._., $".
Subtotal" " $ 490;21f38 252.06 $ 122,212.80 .,'. $ 30,000.00 $ '.,',.
" I I r T , T
I
I Equity Transfers I I I
710 ! Residual Equity Transfer i - - 267,882.37 I -
711 I Transfer to Debt Service I - I 228,752.92 - . -
727 [Transfer to Other Funds I - , - ,I 1,250,217.59 ! - I
I I
Subtotal $ - $228,752.92 $1,518,099.96 $ - $ -
I I I I I I
!HJ{~;~:E?:111TOT~UEXeENDITURE~:~~:3.'.~..$540,564~16:<.r$,:287;773:30t,1'$.1,647,553;03:.;i$:~(~,140,OOC);OOI1:!$:..'t310;C)OO.Oo;
...".1"'/..".,,",.""..,..'""".7.'.'....r'..-.--.....'.-! -'..-.......-'1 ,.. "...=''1.."...., ..'1'......".... .........~
I~g~~[~
, J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE December 17.1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance ~\:)~
Jean D. McGann
I ITEM NO. f). ~ '
Cabling Quotes
REOUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to review and approve the cabling quotes indicated below;
Phones
,
1. TELETEK
$7,240.00
2. CADY Communication
$8,621.00
Computer and Phone cabling
1. American Engineered Communications, Inc. $14,793.40
2. DATA COM Connections
$16,800.00
3. CADY Communications
$20,787.78
4. ESI Communications
$17,138.00
City staff has reviewed all proposals and is recommending TELETEK for the phones and American
Engineered Communications, Inc. for the Computer and Phone cabling.
BACKGROUND:
The original contract for the City Hall Building construction does not include and phone or data cabling.
Therefore, City staff has obtained quotes to provide this service.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: December 1 7. 1996
'. ./
AGENDA SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Discussion
Finance
Jean D. McGann
ITEM NO.
REQUEST:
The Andover City Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution setting the 1997 budget for the
Risk Management Fund.
BACKGROUND:
The Risk Management fund was established to provide funding for compensated absences, safety,
training, loss reduction and insurance deductibles.
\
I
For the budget year 1997, the Risk Management has revenues and expenditures of $26,000.00.
\
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
-'
RES. NO. R- 96
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1997 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND BUDGET.
WHEREAS, the preparation and adoption of operating budgets is recognized a
sound financial practice; and
WHEREAS, the Risk Management Fund was established to provide self insurance
for insurance deductibles, separation from service pay and other unforeseen losses.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Andover hereby establishes the 1997 Risk Management budget as submitted in the
amount of $26,000.
Adopted by the Andover City Council on this 17th day of December, 1996.
CITY OF ANDOVER
1. E. McKelvey, Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Yolk, City Clerk
,
CITY OF ANDOVER
Revenue/Expenditure Budget Worksheet
Budget Year 1997
12/9/963:23 PMRISK.XLS
'.
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND TRUST & AGENCY
1\
/ Revenues
Revenue Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget
Code 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
36210 Interest Earned $ 275.62 $ 338.28 $ 328.42 $ 500.00 $ 500
36230 Contributions 3,045.73 8,914.75 14,466.93 2,500.00 2,500
36243 Flex Benefit Plan Revenue 6,745.00 - - - -
36246 Workers' Compo Refund - 7,624.00 - - -
36260 Refunds and Reimbursements - - 17,935.00 17,000.00 17,000
39201 Transfers from other funds 3 000.00 3 000.00 8000.00 - 6000
.. ~...~ =,,~"''''''''~^ " ""'Subtotilr' 0'_ m'm"~'^ ^^^~, ~.,.., 0,=" , 13166635 . . '1987763 '-46.736.35 -26656.66 $: ~ "~".W'^ ,.'w"., ..,.......~
26000
I '>r~ ~.fm:m. I I I I ."""""'1
Expenditures
Object Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget
Code 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
Personal Services
101 Salaries $ - $ - $ 4,216.18 $ 4,320.00 $ 4,612
104 Salaries - Separation Acct. . - 1,030.06 - -
121 PERA - - 167.10 194.00 207
122 FICA - 315.79 268.00 286
125 Medicare - - 73.82 63.00 67
, 131 Health Insurance - - 184.84 207.00 207
132 Dental Insurance - - - - 20
133 Life Insurance - - 1.53 5.00 8
...."..,; ...'. ;,. 7$.".""".....: '~"$-.['::[.,.$....t:i'iOi'i.,.., "'.$.51657.d6[$T." ,'" """',' 5,406.,
'.., ...."""..",.."""",.... '.', ,;co-, ", ,,',',' ;,;",.., ",',,",",',',',','
SUDplies and Materials
207 Training Supplies $ - $ - $ - $ 500.00 $ 500
210 Operating Supplies - - - 1,000.00 1,000
;.. '.... = ,[$""",..,.... - .$,...<........:.....$""'."~ $ft:hiinn$ '.;'--;1,500
;::iUDlola......,
..', ; ,....;, ..',,' "",."", "."".... ',...", ""..""""""",
Purchased Services
301 Professional Services $ 524.00 $ 434.75 $ 114.75 $ 1 ,000.00 $ 1,000
302 Health & Wellness - - - - 5,694
360 Insurance - 3,839.59 14,539.22 - 4,000
,."..", .".F.. .$[,; ~'lA nn '$'.a.,7d"ld $'.'14)35:'3:97[$ ,1, ooo:ou"!$- ~n etaA'
"",;, == =,' =
Other Services and Charges
433 Dues/Registration 100.00 886.68 780.00 3,000.00 $ 1,500
499 Contingency - - - 9,443.00 6,900
811 Flex Benefit Plan,::~~:-;'.'::,:-; et ".,n "" - - - -
T" .......'. 'F$"'.'.""'fifO&:. . $ RRI::I::R'.$..... "''70r\hhn~12:aa:r06 $ ""8,400'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
'\
DATE: December 1 7. 1996
/
AGENDA SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Non-Discussion
Finance
Jean D. McGann
ITEM NO.
;:):6 ~stablish Fund Reservations
BACKGROUND:
The Fund Reservations Document is still being reviewed and will be faxed to you on Monday.
, I
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
/
DATE: December 1 7. 1996
Non-Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
City Clerk \ ~.
\"
AGENDA SECTION
ITEM NO.
Ilt\dopt Records Retention Schedule
?l () I
The City Council is requested to adopt the attached Records Retention Schedule. This is an
updated version which will replace the schedule adopted in 1983.
Even though we do not have some of the departments for which there are retention schedules
(such as assessing, library, courts) it is recommended by the State Department of Administration
that we adopt the entire schedule.
The retention period is the minimum number of years that we need to retain a document.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
"
/
DATE: December 1 7. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Non-Discussion Items
City Clerk
~~.
ITEM NO.
~:prove 1997 License Renewals
The City Council is requested to approve the following license renewals for 1997:
Ciearette Licenses
/
MelWin Drug
Oasis Market
G-WiII Liquors
Bill's Superette #7
Non-Intoxicatimr Off-Sale Liquor Licenses
Oasis Market
Bill's Superette #7
Non-Intoxicatine On-Sale Liquor Licenses
Tasty Pizza
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: December 17.1996
, /
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson,~(
Engineering
ITEM NO.
Approve Construction Change Directive/
iN.~lfson & Peterson/City Hall ProjecU94-30
The City Council has been requested by Adolfson & Peterson to approve the attached
construction change directive formally identifying the maximum project cost of the City Hall
Addition and the renovation of the existing structure to be $1,300,000.
DEC-II-96 WED 10:12 AM
ADOLF SON PETERSON
FAX NO, 6125252333
P,OI
CONSTRUCTION
CHANGE DIRECTIVE
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER-ADVISER EDITION
AlA OOCUMENT G714/CMa
\
" )lslrUt'tions on fL.'"Vcrse ~idc)
OWNER
CONSTRUCTION MAl\AGHR
ARCHlTEcr
CONTRACTOR
FJELD
OI"HIiR
o
o
o
o
o
o
PROJECT: M.IDOVER CITY HALL
Cltv of Andover
(,vmll<' ""'/ '''/''"."r 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
TO CONTHACTOH:ADOLFSON & PETERSON, INC.
(N",n:' "11'/'''''''''",) 6 701 W. 23rd St.
Minneapolis, MN 55426
DIRECTIVE NO.: 111
DATE: Nov. 3D, 1996
PROJECf NOS.: 113410
CONTRACf FOR: Construction ~nagement
CONTRACT nATE~~pdl 4, 1996
You an: hcreby directed to make tht: fullowlng change(s) in this Contracl:
To renovate the existing City Hall at 1685 Crosstown Blvd., N.W., Andover, MN 55304.
This directive stipulates a maximum project cost of $1,300,000, with architectural fees
included.
Sign:alU:e by the Contr:lCfOr indk"'.ltc(lt the: -1
Contractor's aRi\.-cmL"tlt with rI~c praJposcll
3dJusuncnu in Contr2ct SUol aDG C()nlr.ll~t
Time Set forth in thi. Conslrue,;"n Change
Directive.
PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS
I. The pn1lx "'."tl ha$ls of adjustment to the Contract Sum or Guaranteed
M:"imum Prk'c is: $l,300,00J.OO
/ DC I.Ul11p Sum (innease) i(~of' 320,000.00
CONTRACTOR
D Unit Prh:c of S
per
Add=.
o '" pmviJed in SUhp",",lgraph 7.3.6 of AlA Do<:ument A2011CMa, 1992 edition,
o 'I.S follows:
BY
2, TI1l" COl1[raet Time is proposed to (~(remain unchanged), Tht: DATE
propns(:(1 "dinsllnent, if any. is (all increase of fIT I A day.) (a decrease
of 0 tl~ys).
Wht,n signed by the Owner, (,ollMruetion Manager and Architect and received by the COnlnctor, this document becomes effective
IMMEDIATELY a.s" Construction Ch'"gc Directive (CeO), and the Comranor shall prueet:o with the change(s) descnhcd ahove.
()\'(lNEH
CONSTRUCTION M.'\NAGER
ARCHITIiCT
,\tldl"(....S
Addrt:'s~
Address
BY
fly
BY
DXIE__
DAre
D.\TE
)rI!
.1.
.. ..
-... ,.-
-
CAUTION: You should use an original AlA document which has this caution printed In red.
An original assures that changes will not be obscured Ba may occur when documents are reproduced.
AlA DOCUMENT G7141CMa . UlNS1'HUGI10N CHANGE DIRECTIVE . CON~"TRt!('TION MANAGER....rNliPR FDn'loN . !'Jg!
1'1>ITI(lN . .\IA. . (,1\WI . TIlE AMERICAN INS""llTIITE OF ARClnTECTS, 173~ NEW YORK AVPNl"F. NW. WASIIIN(;IUI'. J),c.
!""".'!'>l . WARNING: Unlicensed photoc:opytng violates US. COPrr1ghl .... 100 w11lUlject the vldmor to legal pmsecutIon.
G714/CMa-1992
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE:
December 1 7. 1 996
/
AGENDA SECTION
Non Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
David Almgren ~;r;:?./
Building Official ~
ITEM NO.
Ordinance Chapter 7080
~~ended
The City Council is requested to approve Septic Ordinance Chapter 7080 as amended. The
City agreed with Met Council that we would adopt the new 7080 by January 1, 1997.
/
, ,
SUMMARY OF CHAPTER 7080 The Septic Ordinance
\
/ Adopting Chapter 7080 by Reference, Minimum Requirements with more
Restrictive Standards. Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 parts 7080.0060,
7080.0130,7080.0170,7080.0175,7080.0305, 7080.0700, 7080.0900,
7080.0910 relating to individual sewage treatment systems are hereby adopted
as amended and made a part of this ordinance as if fully set forth herein.
The above adopted rules are hereby amended as follows for the City of Andover:
1. The owner must upgrade or repair a system within 6 months from notice
of non compliance.
2. Minimum size tank-- 3 bedroom or less is 1250 gallon.
3. Minimum size tank-- 4-6 bedroom is 1500 gallon.
4. Minimum size tank-- 7-9 bedroom is 2000 gallon.
5. Gravelless drainfield pipe shall not be used because of a history of
failures.
6. Maintenance report forms shall be sent to property owners, 1/2 each year
to be filled out and returned as to the condition of their systems. This part of the
ordinance has been in effect since 1976.
7. A requirement that all lots created after January 23, 1996 have two 5,000
S.F. areas for drainfield design for a four bedroom home.
8. That no person, firm or corporation shall design, evaluate, install,
maintain, pump or inspect unless certified by MPCA as an individual sewage
treatment system (ISTS) professional.
9. The Building Official is responsible for the administration of this
ordinance.
10. Any system which allows effluent to percolate from the ground shall abate
such nuisance within thirty days as set forth in this ordinance.
11.' No experimental or alternate system except at city discretion.
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
An ordinance repealing Ordinance #37, adopted August 3, 1976 known as the
"septic" ordinance.
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION,
ALTERATION, EXTENSION, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF INDIVIDUAL
SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS: REQUIRING PERMITS FOR AND
LICENSING OF PERSONS ENGAGED IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND
SERVICING THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE INSPECTION OF SUCH
SYSTEMS, AND THE ABATEMENT OF NUISANCES; PROVIDING FOR THE
INSPECTION OF PRIVATE WATER SYSTEMS, AND PRESCRIBING
PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF: IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER,
COUNTY OF ANOKA, STATE OF MINNESOTA.
BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANDOVER, STATE OF MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS:
An Ordinance adopting Chapter 7080 Rules relating to individual sewage
treatment systems program.
SECTION 1.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby adopts "Individual Sewage
Treatment Standards, Chapter 7080" as amended.
SECTION 2.
7080.0060 subp.4 Required Upgrade
...owner must upgrade, replace, or discontinue use of the system within six
months from notice of noncompliance.
SECTION 3.
7080.0130 Sewage Tanks
Amend Table II
# of Bedrooms
Liquid Capacity (gallons)
/
3 or less
4 to 6
7 to 9
1250
1500
2000
SECTION 4.
, )
7080.0170 Final Treatment and Disposal
B. (3) Gravelless drainfield pipe
Delete entire section
SECTION 5.
7080.0175 Maintenance
The City is divided into two areas for the purpose of biennial reporting by
property owners. The area west of CSAH NO.9 shall report on odd years and
the area east of CSAH No.9 on even years,
I
Each property owner shall complete the maintenance report of his on-site
sewage disposal system and submit the form by September 1st of that year. The
City requires that each property owner has his on-site sewage disposal system
pumped as often as required by inspections, but no less frequently than every
three years. Failure on the part of the property owner to have an on-site sewage
disposal system cleaned when said system is found to require cleaning shall be
cause for the City to provide for the cleaning service and provide the property
owner with an advance notification of the date the system will be cleaned. The
cost of this service shall be assessed to the property owner.
SECTION 6.
7080.0305 Requirements for Local Ordinances
subpA
E. A provision that requires all lots created after January 23, 1996 shall have
two (2) 5,000 square foot areas designated and staked for the primary and
secondary on-site septic drainfield based on design criteria for a four (4)
bedroom home. The designated drainfield locations as stated above shall
comply with Chapter 7080 as amended. The location of the primary and
secondary sites shall be indicated on the preliminary grading plan and the design
specifications for the drainfields shall be submitted at the time of the submittal of
the preliminary plat.
/
SECTION 7.
, J 7080.0700 Licenses
subp.1
1. No person, firm or corporation shall design, evaluate, install, maintain, pump
or inspect an individual sewage treatment system unless they are certified by the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) as an Individual Sewage Treatment
System (ISTS) Professional.
2. No person, firm or corporation shall engage in the business of designing,
evaluating, installing, pumping or inspecting such systems in the City without first
obtaining a license from MPCA and present this to the city for verification.
3. Any installation, construction, alteration or repair of a sewage disposal system
by a licensee in violation of any provision of this Ordinance or refusal on the part
of a licensee to correct such defective work shall be cause for revocation of or
refusal to renew a license. Said license may be revoked or its renewal refused.
The licensee shall be given a hearing by the City Council to show cause why
such license should not be revoked or refused. Notice of the time, place and
purpose of such hearing shall be in writing.
SECTION 8.
/
7080.0900 Enforcement
subp.6. Any person, firm, corporation or voluntary association which violates any
provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction
thereof shall be punished as defined by state law.
8.... Enforcing Officer. The Building Official shall be responsible for the
administration of this ordinance.
a. Issuance of Permits. No building permit for any building requiring an on-site
disposal system shall be issued until the required on site disposal design has
been completed by a Certified ISTS person.
.c... Inspection
J
1. The Building Official shall make such inspection or inspections as are
necessary to determine compliance with this Ordinance. No part of a newly
constructed system, or an existing system which has been altered, extended or
repaired shall be covered until it has been inspected and approved by the
Building Official. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant for the permit to
give twenty four (24) hours prior notice to the Building Official that the job will be
ready for inspection or reinspection. It shall be the duty of the owner or occupant
of the property to give the Building Official free access to the property at
reasonable times for the purpose of making such inspections.
"
2. If upon inspection the Building Official discovers that any part of the system is
not constructed or operating in accordance with the minimum standards provided
in this Ordinance, he shall give the owner or applicant written notification
describing the defects. Such notice shall prescribe a reasonable time within
which such defect must be corrected. If, after such written notice is given, and
the owner or applicant neglects or refuses to correct such defects or fails to
make the system conform to this ordinance within the time specified in said
notice, the City shall then repair the defective system. The City would acquire
three bids from certified installers with the lowest bidder repairing the system.
The cost shall be assessed against the property upon which the defective
system is located. No system shall be placed or replaced in service until all
defects have been corrected or eliminated, and a reinspection has been made.
The applicant shall pay an additional fee for each reinspection that is necessary.
3. Any system which allows septic tank effluent to percolate from the ground,
contaminating ground or surface waters, or causing noxious odors, or which
because of its operation or construction imperils the health, safety or welfare of
the public, is declared to be a nuisance. Upon receipt of notice of
noncompliance setting forth facts that a system constitutes a nuisance. The
owner shall abate such nuisance within thirty (30) days. Upon the failure of such
owner to abate said nuisance within the prescribed time. The city shall proceed
to abate said nuisance as prescribed in Section C.2.
4. In addition to the specifications herein provided, the City may cause regular or
periodic inspections of any or all systems within the City to insure that all
systems are in proper operation and in compliance with this ordinance. It shall
be the duty of the owner or occupant of property to give the inspector free
access to the property at reasonable times for the purpose of making such
inspections. If the owner does not give free access, the City may obtain a
search warrant for the purpose of determining health or safety violations on
private property.
SECTION 9.
7080.0910 Alternative and Experimental Systems
No experimental or alternate systems except at city discretion.
\
)
SECTION 10.
Validity
In the event any word, phrase, sentence, clause or section is found to be in
conflict with the provision of this ordinance, the most restrictive interpretation
shall apply.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this _ day of
1996.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J. E. McKelvey, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE:
December 1 7. 1 996
,
/
AGENDA SECTION
Non Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
David Almgren " W .-/
Building Official ~
ITEM NO.
Repeal Ordinance 37
~p-tic Ordinance
Irv;O.
The City Council is requested to repeal Ordinance 37 Septic Ordinance.
,
'\
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACflON
DATE December 17, 1996
ITEM
r-n Lot SplitWariance 96-09
4040 South Enchanted Dr NW
James & Linda Kaldahl
()l,
Planning ~~~
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
AGENDA SECnON
r-n Non-Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY:
John Hinzman
Request
'.
The City Council is asked to review the lot split and variance request of James and Linda
Kaldahl at 4040 South Enchanted Drive NW. The applicant proposes to split a 0.15 acre
portion of a 2.66 acre parcel to relieve an encroachment of a garage and satellite antenna
of the eastern adjacent property owner. The split parcel would then be sold to the
neighbor to the east. Variances are needed due to the size of the split parcel. Staffhas
included provisions to bind the split parcel with the adjacent property so it cannot be sold
separately.
Recommendation
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the lot split and
variance request. Please consult the attached staff report dated November 26,1996 and
the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting for further information.
')
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -96
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE LOT SPLI1\V ARIANCE REQUEST OF JAMES
AND LINDA KALDAHL PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 40 AND VARYING
FROM THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 6.02, MINIMUM
DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4040 SOUTH
ENCHANTED DRIVE NW (PIN 18-32-24-44-0015).
WHEREAS, James and Linda Kaldahl have requested to split a portion of Lot 2, Block 3,
Fox Meadows Addition, pursuant to Ordinance No. 40 and varying from the provisions of
Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02, Minimum District requirements for an R-l, Single Family
Rural District on property located at 4040 South Enchanted Drive NW, Lot 2, Block 3,
Fox Meadows Addition, legally described as follows:
That part of Lot 2, Block 3, FOX MEADOWS, according to the recorded plat
thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows:
. '.
Commencing at the northeast comer thereof; thence South 15 degrees 12 minutes
25 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the easterly line thereof a distance of
119.86 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 33
degrees 52 minutes 23 seconds West a distance of 31.78 feet; thence South 03
degrees 34 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 152.67 feet; thence North 89
degrees 00 minutes 13 seconds East a distance of 56.51 feet to the easterly line of
said Lot 2; thence North 15 degrees 12 minutes 25 seconds West along said
easterly line a distance of 184.23 feet to the point of beginning. Said parcel
containing 0.15 acres more or less.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has
determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No. 40 and that based on
Section IV, the City Council may vary the application of any of the provisions of the
Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a
detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of
Andover; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no opposition to the request; and
'\
,
Page Two
LS\V AR 96-09
4040 South Enchanted Drive NW
December 17, 1996
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council
approval of the lot split\variance as requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover
hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and
approves the lot split\variance on said property with the following conditions:
1. That the lot split be subject to a sunset clause as defined in Ordinance No. 40, Section
III(E).
2. That a covenant be recorded that legally binds the aforementioned portion of Lot 2,
Block 3 with Lot 3, Block 3, Fox Meadows Addition so they cannot be sold separately.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 11ili day of
December, 1996.
. "
CITY OF ANDOVER
A TIEST:
I.E. McKelvey, Mayor
Victoria V olk, City Clerk
"-
)
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
- November 26, 1996
(
/(Public Hearin. Preliminary Plat - Crown pointe East Second Addition
Section 25 - Ashfo Development Corporation, Continued)
Commissioner Peek noted t is whether denial of the variance on
the access to Prairie Road w~ y the reasonable use of the lot. He
did not think reasonable use 0 he parcel would be denied, as it is
possible to access 142nd Avenue and '11 meet all setback requirements.
The other Commissioners generally agre
MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Wells, to fo rd the Staff prepared
Resolution to the City Council with the recommenda 'on for approval with
the following change: Strike Item No. 1 and move e numbers of the
other items so it becomes Items 1-5. Motion carried a 4-Yes, 3-
Absent (Apel, Barry, Luedtke) vote. This will be placed on December
17, 1996, City Council agenda unless the developer formally sts it
be continued to the first meeting in January. 7:55 p.m.
PUBLIC HBARING: LOT SPLIT/VARIANCE - 4040 SOUTH BNCHANTBD DRIVX - LINDA
AND JAMBS XALDAHL
7:55 p.m. Mr. Hinzman reviewed the request of James and Linda Kaldahl
to split a .15-acre section from a 2. 66-acre parcel at 4040 South
Enchanted Drive and to vary from the lot size on the newly created lot.
'~ garage and TV satellite dish were mistaken constructed on this parcel
-by the eastern adjoining property owner. The intent is to sell the
split parcel to the neighboring property owner. Simply moving the
interior lot line is prohibited on platted property, necessitating this
proposed lot split and variance. Both lots will exceed the minimum
district requirements for an R-1, Single Family Rural residential lot
upon approval of the lot split. A covenant will be recorded that
legally binds the split .15-acre parcel with the neighboring parcel sa
they cannot be sold separately. The applicant is requesting this
procedure to be able to obtain a clear title so they can sell their
property. Staff is recommending approval with conditions. Commissioner
Wells asked about the time line and title to the parcel.
Linda Kaldahl. 4040 South Enchanted Drive NW - believed their house was
built in 1984 and the neighboring residence was built between 1984 and
1986. She also thought the garage was constructed in 1990, and they
have been unable to find out when the satellite dish was erected. They
moved to this parcel only two years ago, and the garage and satellite
dish were in place when they purchased the property. She assumes that
means they didn't have clear title when they bought the house.
Chairperson Squires stated the Kaldahls are trying to sell their
property and cannot because of the encroachments. While there may be
other options, such as suing the neighbor to remove them, this is the
request the Commission is to consider. Mr. Carlberg stated the City'S
requirements have changed since the garage was built so this type of
~istake does not happen again.
)
MOTION by Wells, Seconded by Putnam, to open the public hearing.
Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Apel, Barry, Luedtke) vote.8:04 pm
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - November 26, 1996
Page 5
/(Public Hearing: Lot SplitjVariance-4040 South Enchanted Drive, Cont.)
Ms. Kaldahl - stated they have been dealing with the situation for the
past 18 months to try to come up with an amicable agreement. It became
very clear to them that that was ~ot going to be a possibility, as the
neighbor was not willing to finis~ the deal without this much property.
They do not want to go to court. They purchased the property not
knowing the condition. About nine months after purchasing it, they did
a survey and found out the property lines. That is when they found the
encroachment on the property. They did not have title insurance. Mr.
Carlberg stated the satellite dish is a large one, mounted on a pole.
Staff would treat it like a structure and require that it be 10 feet off
the property line. This is 47 feet from where it should be. They want
to sell their property but are unable to do so until this is resolved.
Commissioner Wells asked if the City has legal recourse to have the
satellite dish removed. Mr. Carlberg believed it is a private issue
that would have to go through the court system to be resolved.
MOTION by Putnam, Seconded by Wells, to close the public hearing.
Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Apel, Barry, Luedtke) vote. 8:10
p.m.
Commissioner Putnam felt this is an unusual way to solve this dilemma
and was concerned with setting a precedent. He was not as concerned
,~ith the garage encroachment as with the satellite dish. Mr. Carlberg
stated the Commission has dealt with similar situations regarding garage
or home encroachments, but he is not aware of one involving a satellite
dish. Commissioner Peek stated he would be more concerned if the parcels
would not conform to the setbacks and acreage requirements after the lot
split. It would be somewhat arbitrary to force another procedure upon
the applicant who made the decision based on more knowledge that the
Commission has. They are not creating a nonconforming situation by
giving the variance. Commissioner Wells disagreed, stating the garage
is in, but the satellite dish is movable. She felt the City is setting
precedent. The dish is set back 47 feet more than allowed in a rural
area. If it was an urban area, it would be in the middle of someone's
back yard.
Mr. Carlberg cautioned the review is of the lot split and variance, not
the structures and their setbacks. It is a process of carving a small
piece of land and joining it legally to another parcel. Chairperson
Squires noted the covenant would require the split parcel be attached to
the neighboring lot, so two conforming lots are left. There would be no
setback problems.
MOTION by Peek, Seconded by putnam, to forward the Staff prepared
Resolution to the City Council with a recommendation for approval.
DISCUSSION: Commissioner Wells stated she agrees with the lot split but
-disagrees with its size. Motion carried on a 3-Yes (Squires, Peek,
)utnam), I-No (Wells), 3-Absent (Apel, Barry, Luedtke) vote. This will
be on the December 17, 1996, City Council agenda. 8:11 p.m.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
,I
DATE November 26, 1996
AGENDA ITEM
5. Public Hearing: LS 96-09 Variance
4040 South Enchanted Drive NW
James & Linda Kaldahl
ORIGINATING DEPARTME~T ,W
Planning ~VJ\ \
John Hinzman
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
BY:
Request
The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the lot split\variance request of
James and Linda Kaldahl to split a 0.15 acre section from a 2.66 acre parcel located at
4040 South Enchanted Drive NW (PIN 18-32-24-44-0015), legally described as Lot 2,
Block 3, Fox Meadows Addition.
The property is zoned for R-l, Single Family Rural.
Applicable Ordinances
Ordinance No. 40, regulates the division of lots. A lot split is defined as any division of a
lot, parcel or tract of land into not more than two (2) parcels when both divided parcels
meet or exceed the minimum requirements for a platted lot in the applicable zoning
district. Section IV also gives the City Council the power to vary or modify the
application of this ordinance provided such variance or modification is consistent with
the letter and intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
Ordinance 8, Section 5.04, establishes the variance procedure and process.
Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02, establishes the provisions for minimum lot width, lot
depth and lot area in a R-I, Single Family Rural zoned district. The minimum
requirements in a R-l district are as follows:
Lot Width at Front Setback
Lot Depth
Lot Area Per Dwelling
- 300 feet
- 150feet
- 108,900 square feet (2.5 acres)
Background
The applicant is requesting a Lot Split and Variance to alleviate an encroachment created
by the eastern adjoining property owner at 4020 South Enchanted Drive NW (Lot 3,
Block 3, Fox Meadows Addition). A garage and TV satellite dish were mistakenly
, constructed, transgressing upon the applicant's property. Upon execution of the lot split,
J
,
,
r
Page Two
LS\V AR 96-09, Kaldahl
4040 South Enchanted Drive NW
November 26,1996
the Kaldahl's would sell the split parcel the neighboring property owner.
The movement of interior lot lines is prohibited on platted property, necessitating the
creation of a substandard lot and the need for a variance. Both lots will exceed the
minimum district requirements of Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 upon approval of the lot
split. Staffwill require that a covenant be recorded that legally binds the split 0.15 acre
parcel with the neighboring parcel so they cannot be sold separately.
Determination
Staffhas determined that strict enforcement of the provisions of 6.02 would preclude the
applicant reasonable use of the property, creating an unnecessary hardship, not created by
the property owner, and reason for granting a variance, as stipulated in Ordinance 8,
Section 5.04.
Commission Options
. /
1. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City Council approval
of the lot split\variance requested by James and Linda Kaldahl on property located at
4040 South Enchanted Drive NW, legally described as Lot 2, Block 3, Fox Meadows
Addition. The Commission finds the request meets the requirements of Ordinances No.8
and 40
2. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City Council denial of
the lot split\variance requested by James and Linda Kaldahl on property located at 4040
South Enchanted Drive NW, legally described as Lot 2, Block 3, Fox Meadows Addition.
The Commission finds the request does not meet the requirements of Ordinances No.8
and 40. In recommending denial of the request, the Commission shall state those reasons
for doing so.
3. The Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item pending further information
from Staff.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the lot split\variance as requested with the following
conditions:
.-1
Page Three
LSW AR 96-09, Kaldahl
4040 South Enchanted Drive NW
November 26,1996
1. That the lot split be subject to a sunset clause as defined in Ordinance No. 40, Section
III(E).
2. That a covenant be recorded that legally binds that part of Lot 2, Block 3 with Lot 3,
Block 3, Fox Meadows Addition so they cannot be sold separately.
Attachments
A-I Resolution
A-2 Legal Description of Split Parcel
A-3 Area Location Map
A-4 Site Location Map
A-5 Site Plan
A-6 Lot Split and Variance Applications
A-7 Notice of Public Hearing
,
,
J
Attachment A-2
Proposed Parcel Split
Legal Description
That part of Lot 2, Block 3, FOX MEADOWS, according to the recorded plat thereof,
Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the northeast comer thereof; thence South 15 degrees 12 minutes 25
seconds East, assumed bearing, along the easterly line thereof a distance of 119.86 feet to
the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 33 degrees 52 minutes 23
seconds West a distance of 31.78 feet; thence South 03 degrees 34 minutes 50 seconds
East a distance of 152.67 feet; thence North 89 degrees 00 minutes 13 seconds East a
distance of 56.51 feet to the easterly line of said Lot 2; thence North 15 degrees 12
minutes 25 seconds West along said easterly line a distance of 184.23 feet to the point of
beginning. Said parcel containing 0.15 acres more or less.
/
\----------H "\. 7'/'}'/ "Qfcs.r'
I I ~ // I,
I Attachment A-3
I LS\ V AR 96-09 ~
_ _ _ _ I Area Location Map ~
6-~~;::::::: I
~~L~ I
ICASLR\ ,_.I._ M' ~ [l: I ~ ~v ! I
!ADO~TION \ -.. _II ~
I,' . \'" f-.-REGI. TEEfD I ' - f--- 1---,-.1/ H
~ _. REGIS'{EREO ' - I I
" "., _ j~ _-' _ _ . __ ~.4NLL~ltR~,frl-. _- I - I
I I H --::-r)lN~ ~ NO. ~9-,-"\/'~ i : ~il - !~f'
, I I! _. . -., I '.,' I,,,--V, /' ~,\ /
! 'I I i -. ~ '. ,. J 'i' ~\
_ ~, .. _.SLJ VEr- ~ : l/---Llii'!"\"' :~ 't; I : ~ '();
- I 1 I I -'. ' ,y i" - ,
/ ~ f-- --,- 1-- -~-~ _- .r-,-B,tf yf----j..,'~t;s.,,!- h_. ~ ' '
, ) ,;L...- ,1Il.L-Si "I" a -.
I I _. 3. A I I 1/ ~ h 'I-.
I I '-~-~~ 72-' i. . /' f '\ " "if-- " --,-
'L ~ ,: I I- I 1 _, '.-. ~L, 81f' ,\.'\'~' ---'--'~ ,:
'~; fi\': I >- + - -. ~. '. Fd~/ ./. ,:::T " "
~~~~J:::-I'I ~ ' 1J:~1"- ii' , ~rTrV ~i~lviE.,ijj --\... .......,i-'o--j;J l--- i
7' ,_., I ~, ,-~.' ' 'Q'l/7r.UJ ,""- ';""~ 1
, I ~~ jro/" . . "';;'-, ,~. :1: ". ~ ::"v,~, -:
I I /, ~ ' wi 3, . ~lRRA ~: ,1\ I
,\-- // ~ ,~~z:~ff:- ',',. ' 5, ".-r?' ) H i i ~ ,
\8:/' ~'I .\,\ ,'".::. ".\ :"/! i i
. . \. :'t-::; ~ I ~ I I
...J. ,VER I-=-- ' .. I ' Ii , " ,4 i i I
, . I " f-- INlJ(AN--{lwEADaW:i I ,
~'!:1'-;t" 7 ~ .':/. n :' \ . I. \- ~--I
\ j I I! :.1'.1 I, ~ '
, "'-;i.;:.l!I"i:i::":'!':'__.~.::::h_'_:-__-_::":--"0J.~_'f;"
(f;1) r-,--,' i ':3' ~~~ bf\~ ,~!'~:.~ " "1~?i~~ -
"J ' ' ,,<, , " ii' WATES ~~
R~:0~f\ !/ ~~'{~ ' ,~~ _ 3 ,.l-.:..~~:. ii'
7 /j.WiJ.~' ~~. ,~ "4': :~~T'5' r:s~ i ' -
~r/i\/yywoo ~~AfE~~ e- "~~o;.1 Iii
~/'L. .,2"0..00., I I
~/ .. -~'
~is\--'" ...... -:..~.:,,,:....~.Cr~>,'O~P:i _' I 'I ,2. -; _:'
__ _ ",,'''' _ LU/;IO'7l'-R"OUND-LAKE.ESTAT'cS
c: fL-'" . -----', -' )
. i,!. -. ,- . " '.4' ~,' ~: .~' , ' , . ~
,':' .".. . ., I _.4-_
'"' ,,:..,.. ....~.. ..!I 6'. I ---
,'" ~~L' B '~\;cr~j:::':'~ .-:" :
...., '," ~r~ ..-'''~'' I/O
':.' ," ',z!,:- '.sD",.\ ..'.."~.'"V'
:~-.~ ~~~~ ~.:~ :,;" ;~;~{:'r'~~ :
:::,,"~' Ti''',,,,,,~ f- .,;jo>!'~n' ".,.~..".~. :,.,1","
,-;o\-;j-:-- ::1-"'11-' \,----,l- ..=' d.,<4.~"~'~7 -
~-:l" i"':"" .. . C:l." ~~. ,~ ~' ... n..~....._ ;: -:;:=... -- ---
c . ' . . . ,: ,~_,'''~F4..::~:r.;.~;;:'.- ~':--:--:-:ID'
0..-....:. -, '1::::\l,Ot-HN'S'JU 7"/ -:~;!1:' -"":;'':~~r~"L'~~~~' ~:i:: ~~
~~+AI)O;H.:1 .:: ':: .;~~ I' ~ l' 801,1NO'fY ~ '.J' . ~:
~_ _ _ .... . i~ I t" ~. _11 "- .,...
,~~ .~..~~ ..r'~ ~!:;~~~~~~~l-CO";'1s~,O!( 'zj~r.:
l--
f-'-;
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
_I
o
o
...
~
'I------~---
,
1
I
I
I I
L j------i----
I
I
I
(;
o
CD
~
n.-H
~'
~ '~
....;,...)... -
~~ \~.
.... i~ 'I
;2 /.Q.
o
~
I-.-
I-
-I-
r-
!~
,
,
-.;:
',_ ,~ 1
~'" --a- I
::E'~
.s:( , x
a: >-1 I
,."
..
a
.. ~ !
E \~-- '
'~~~J
/
N
w~ ANOKA ........
....... COUNTY ........E
SU~R
5
.'
\
/
,
I !
~
i I
R
L
::",-~",""''-''~''''_Yn'::;;<'';''; :'"-'i,~,,.~' " _,~..;x :,;:':~:;;i'c'.1.~ "Cc;" ~~t~;:;~':d:!J.]. i-b.~';iiTI;~:1i~
36
T.'.12 R.24
Attachment A-4
LS\ V AR 96-09
Site Location Map
659/8
WER
@
".'.--
-..J.,_......._..
.,. ~ . I'..,
@
"
r v.4 CORNEll
$EC. /6
{f}
TRACT -A'"
I 'fJ)
'"
~
I:
LANE
,~
I
I
I
I
I
I
\-
\
\
s ~
(I) ..
'l;,
~~
, (1)
2
l
,
"
,
(q)
ENCHANTEQ _
-\
....'
";-'
, .~
,
........> rf;
'AIII~
M
s
(w)
,
Ii)
II
. .
, .
.......':--.;.:~;
'"'1-.-
..: '1~7 Tn PJlJr:::Ilw.-:= ~tffl'F~~tGHWA~ :.iL":'::.. . ';''':':'':':''c' m_'
\
/
1 r -.. 2660./T RES.---
1 r
s.E. CORNCIf
SEC.'S
@
8
~15<15< S
G.~~~~
~w
... ~~~l'i~
o 0 "
0 "" ~o1io""~n J ~~~~JE
{l:;- - u u s:I u
... . ~ '~ il 5 II ~ tb of! l:l ' )-DlI(~
N o 51 II'ICII~aI
S 8 " 1l...~~.~o.:J S i" ~i o~
id ~~ 51l~1l"~"'J! 11 ~ ~~~
.... of! ~ ~ o!! II fl" .:J' g~~ :
l2 .... ~~ 't' ;;:bl~~::f ~~I5S,E
I 0 "
;z; ~~ M"o"'d.a'z~ tlb e~~gh "-
V' 0 of!tfll.8""'Il"'~ .! ~I-Q~ ~
?'I ~ llWJS~R5B~=a. )-~~\ol~ ct
=> Ce.!!:1X
:t -. ><~ fl~'"" -SJ8 llI::.:O)ool.J 0
--_./ I ~3~~F <0 z
..... \0 ~ l2~ 8 g -= Jp:: ll"'. 5 g'e 0
s:: 0\ ~;:: t!~o"~",,ll -SOlo ~
Q) 00 ..... :l b oS =:; M ~ ..... ii
~ s:: ~~ '" 0
S ... " ~ ~ of! ':l 'm il ~ 14 3 ~ '8-
tI:l ~ g II
..s:: -< a1:Ui gr:OtlONO~~ u
U ;> p.. ~~ N-a~ ,,;l:ll'l~rIl;;:~=a.:g-s
tI:l -- Q) ... of!.m.a-. ~ II 0" I S
..... (/) ..... 0 ~""= t;l N H ~ ~~ 8 ~ ~ t;
< .- ~~ jutE
~ (/) ...""~ tIO_ ~ t..,. II a 0 ~
~~ o ~ .. .~ ~ u 0"" 1i ~ ::UI ~ ;:!
~~ ;8-0 a t: D.a~l.H' ~~:: .
:;!o e " ~ ~;,&.-S~.. ~ ii:;~
... ~ C-U]
0" \:lu ~of! 8 ; ~ .s ~ ;;: ~ .n ! .m 'S
:d ~~ ~ 0 " .~.. 'a. /~oO 'r-
~""
-- 71i' '/Z'P --
~, 'f ~
~
~ < 'C'\
~ ~ .1
~ t--~
lJ I' " ,~
.... ~..
. I , ,~
~o I. !..,.
. 0
~ "'I,oi ~~
0;.'1- ~~
k:: ~~ . . ,
~ I 1) .~
'""
~ '-j I ~ ~'"
q:-' ~
::t: ~ 'I
Iv \
~ t!j ..
.~
.
:-
~II ..
/ ..
? I ~
~
.
,
/
...
C>
. .,
~t..>:::
r_~ .
e::"'"'i~
~ .. ~
tj~~
Q~~
~~...~
~ 5:e
~~ ~~
~~(
~~~
0.,.; 6'
::::;~l
_~,S'
t3:s~
..
\
I ,..;>0....,
t- 't - ~ - ~ <c.,
I
I
-~'.
~.. o.'.~2
I : ~~~
i ~-:>____ -
.L--,-_-1_~_
..
...
..
. '"
.. ,
... ,
-~..,
'" I'
"'ff\ ;
.. ..
~~I
~
do' "
~- "
~ ci
C> ~
"
It\
;
- __ I
I..
<)
"
0'
.'" ,
<J ,
.....
'" ,
... .
. '0
~~
<\),
'i'
r:-
'l..
.~.
S". ..
-. 'Z5 e.
'\' SO/Z
-:. .s I 8-~
..... _ ~ 4-/4,1
l
I"H
"-oii
<;:)..
.J~
~
';:'
~~
.
~ ~
:,; ~
'< ~
, ,
t: ~
.. ~
"
~"
""'
...'
~~
~
~
- - "
"'-< s ," "1' ,
, , ,-S 'tJ,1
'( JI..
~"
...",'
~.;
~...
.
~
"i
~~
1~
, ,
o~
<> .
'<)
I:l <)
"'.
"'0-
,":1
'<-j
:~
0'
9 ~
<5.'
'" ~
N.
0-
'"
'oj
b,"",
~~
t;l'~~~
~.~
~~L
za~
'~al
0-10..0
;aaili
-con
~ee'
~o.~
"I'"
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
Property Address
LOT SPLIT REQUEST FORK
1-/ 0 4 D So. ~ "\.<:..h Go.."'- .k d i) (' .
. , '
....'^-.i
AV\~~~"I (11."""'. s~3t'1
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is appropriate):
Part of Lot ~ Block.3 Addi tion "::c'J.... l'\..\\?,^-ck\.oJS
more fully descr~ on Certif~cate ot Survey dated September ~, 1990, attached hereto.
PIN ,,-3J.-8-4-L/L/-CG/5 (If metes and bounds, attach the
complete legal description).
Is the property: Abstract )( or Torrens ? (This
information must be provideafina can be obta1ned from the
County) .
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Reason for Request
To convey a .1S-acre parcel to the owner of Lot 3, Block 3, FOX MEADOWS, in
order to resolve an encroachment problem created bv the neiqhbor's qaraqe and
TV satellite dish.
/
Current zoning ~I
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Applicant :)C.""""~ CA",d L~t'\.do-. y\o..\dl:.,-k \
Address Lj.oyo S~. (ro.c:.ll;1o.V\.+~<! Dr. ""';v0
Home Phone ?, d3 - ~ \ \ Ie
Signature ~..\tv"<.;~h.\..\.tt~ .;~ ~(' ~ ~'fA r. if Date November 12, 1996
II ~
-----------.-----------------------------------------------------
..'
A\t\c\ t:~ €' ~ ,
"'^ oM 5.>-3 c 't
Business phone
Property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address
Home Phone
Business Phone
Signature
Date
-----------------------------------------------------------------
/
LOT SPLIT
PAGE 2
Attach a scaled drawing of the proposed split of the property
) showing: scale and North arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent
street names; location and use of existing structures within 100
feet.
The date the property became a lot of record, the names and
addresses of all property owners within 350 feet of the property
proposed to be split, and the complete legal description of the
subject property must also be provided.
I hereby certify that this property has not been subdivided
within the last three years.
Lot Spli t Fee:
Recording Fee
Abstract property
Torrens property
~oy
~
'ii:SO
Date
Paid jj J;J jqb
Receipt
EV
.03-;035
/
Park Dedication: VJAIVED Date Paid
Rev. 5-06-93:d'A
5-25-94:bh
2-0l-95:bh
Res. 179-91 (11-05-91)
Receipt .
\
\ ,/
(j\
CITY of ANDOVER
VARIANCE REQUEST FORM
Property Address
4 0 '-I 0 ~c. ~c kc... '" +e c:l Dt: N vJ
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is appropriate):
part of Lot d-.. Block .3 Addi tion F ex }'\,H v...cti:,,-.::~
more fully described on Certificate of Survey dated S~ember 5, 1996, attached hereto.
plat Parcel PIN l~- -ffl-l/L/-CO'p
(If metes and bounds, attach the comp ete lega )
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Description of Request
That the renmant parcel be qranted a variance from minimum district
reauirements of Section 6.02.
Specific Hardship :; +,,'C+ efl.foaeme//+ of +Ae... Pl"dU15;'0i15 o-f
~ec+ b .0;;" lAJJulri p(eclucle +he Pl'oAzI"+y Ol#nel' l'eC{50/I~6k
.
(,{:e d f- + he- '=/I'1d
/
Section of Ordinance ~ 5ec-l, ~ .0.).
Current zoning r<:,- I
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Name of
Applicant T~\I\A.es v..~d.
L\ 0 L\ 0 S:.c. t",c. ~.o...\^ ~ ~
L\ v\ d IJ.. M d v...h \
b ('. A ",d f: ~ e. f, \lV'\ 1M .
.
Address
5S3C,-/
Home Phone 3").3 - 0 \ \ '0 Business Phone
~~~::~::~~~~!~-~~~:~~~.-~~:~~~:~:-~:~~:-1~~-~9~~---___
Property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address
Home phone
Business Phone
Signature
Date
-----------------------------------------------------------------
, /
,
,
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing
at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday, November 26, 1996 at the
Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Blvd NW, Andover, Minnesota to review the
lot split and variance request of James and Linda Kaldahl to subdivide a 0.15 acre parcel
from a 2.66 acre parcel located at 4040 South Enchanted Drive NW (pIN 18-32-24-44-
0015) legally described as the following:
/
Lot 2, Block 3, Fox Meadows Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota; except that
part described as follows: Beginning at a point on the westerly line of said Lot 2,
232.2 feet southeasterly of the Northwest comer thereof, said westerly line is
assumed to bear South 28 degrees, 33 minutes, 43 seconds East; thence South 41
degrees, 26 minutes, 47 seconds East 28.37 feet; thence South 15 degrees, 40
minutes, 39 seconds East 28.37 feet to said westerly line of Lot 2; thence North 28
degrees, 33 minutes, 43 seconds West along said westerly line 55.32 feet to point
of beginning; subject to easements of record.
. ,
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and location. A copy of the
application and location will be available at the Andover City Hall for review prior to
said meeting.
~j~
Victoria V olk, City Clerk
Publication dates: November 15,1996
November 22, 1996
,
)
I
PIN: 173224320022
SCHAUER ROBERT R & J M
3961 S ENCHANTED DR NW
f "'DOVER MN 55304
,
PIN: 173224320023
FORSCHEN WALTER W & PATRICH
3962 S ENCHANTED DR NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
PIN: 173224330007
PORTUGUE ROBERT S & SUSAN A
3931 158TH AVE NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
PIN: 173224330008
LEE DIANE A
3934 158TH AVE NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
PIN: 173224330009
SHERRICK DEAN L & DAWN W
3932 158TH AVE NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
PIN: 183224410006
MULVILLE GARY J & MARGARET
15921 DAKOTA ST NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
PIN: 183224410007
GROTH DAVIDT
4130 160TH LN NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
PIN: 183224410011 '
CZECKAMY F
4021 S ENCHANTED DR NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
PIN: 183224410012
BORDWELL LOIS E
4041 N ENCHANTED DR NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
PIN: 183224410013
BEDNARCZYK T & NEISES G
4101 S ENCHANTED DR NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
. ,
t ..,': 183224440003
GAMMELGAARD EARL J
4020 S ENCHANTED DR NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
PIN: 183224440004
LINDGREN RANDALL C
15801 DAKOTA ST NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
PIN: 183224440005
KNUDSON MICHEL G & WANDA G
15741 DAKOTA ST NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
PIN: 183224440010
MORTENSEN ROBT & CONSTANCE
15740 DAKOTA ST NW PO BOX 21062
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MN 55421
PIN: 183224440011
NEWBERGER SCOIT A & GENS L B
15800 DAKOTA ST NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
PIN: 183224440012
GRUSSING DELTON W & RUTH C
15820 DAKOTA ST NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
PIN: 183224440014
WOODS DAVID G & SANDRA M
15831 DAKOTA ST NW
Ac'JDOVER MN 55304
PIN: 183224440015
KALDAHL JAMES A & LINDA M
4040 S ENCHANTED DR NW
ANDOVER MN 55304
/'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACflON
DATE December 17. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
f\O.. Non-Discussion Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
FOR AGENDA
ITEM
f\O.. Relocation of Structure (MP 96-01)
17051 Crosstown Blvd NW
Denise Deziel
bJ.
Planning ~\NW
BY:
John Hinzman
Request
The City Council is asked to review the relocation of structure request of Denise Deziel at
17051 Crosstown Blvd NW. The applicant proposes to move an existing 1,300 square
foot building onto a 2.58 acre parcel.
Recommendation
/
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the application at the
December 10, 1996 meeting. Comment on the application was limited. Please consult
the attached staff report for further information.
'\
j
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -96
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE RELOCATION OF STRUCTURE REQUEST OF
DENISE DEZIEL PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 4.11 ON
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17051 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW (pIN 12-32-24-
14-0016).
WHEREAS, Denise Deziel has requested to relocate a home on a vacant lot pursuant to
Ordinance No.8, Section 4.11, said vacant lot to be located at 17051 Crosstown Blvd
NW, legally described as follows:
That part of the Southeast 1/4 ofthe Northeast 1/4 of Section 12, Township 32,
Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows:
, J
Commencing at the Northeast comer of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4;
thence West along the North line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 a
distance of 550.65 feet to the point of intersection wit the center line of said
County Road No. 18 as it is now laid out and traveled; thence Southwesterly
along the center line of said County Road No. 18 a distance of284.03 feet to the
point of beginning of the tract ofland to be herein described; thence continuing
along said center line of County Road No. 18 in a Southwesterly direction for a
distance of225.00 feet; thence Southeasterly along a line having a bearing of
South 46 degrees 35 minutes 14 seconds East a distance of 500.00 feet: thence
Northeasterly on a line parallel with the center line of said County Road 18 a
distance of225.00 feet; thence Northwesterly on a line parallel to the
Southeasterly line ofthis tract 500.00 feet to the point of beginning.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has
determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 4.11; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a
detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of
Andover; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council
approval of the lot split\variance as requested.
/
/
Page Two
MP 96-01, Deziel
17051 Crosstown Blvd. NW
December 17, 1996
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover
hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and
approves the lot split\variance on said property with the following conditions:
1. That the relocated structure comply with all applicable City Ordinances including but
not limited to Ordinances No.4, 8, and 10.
2. That the relocated structure be subject to review of the Building Official and Fire
Marshall.
3. That the relocated structure shall be placed on a permanent foundation within (30)
thirty days of the issuance of building permit.
4. That the moving permit be subject to a sunset clause as defined in Ordinance No.8,
Section 5.03(d).
5. That the Building Department ascertain that the lot is buildable.
'.
. /
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 11th day of
December, 1996.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey, Mayor
Victoria V olk, City Clerk
J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE December 10, 1996
AGENDA ITEM
11. Discussion - MP 96-01
Relocation of Structures
17051 Crosstown Blvd NW
T"\_ ,;ro - ..
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT, \/
Planning ~\\l~
John Hinzman
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
BY:
Request
The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the relocation of structure
request of Denise Deziel to move a home onto a 2.58 acre parcel located at 17051
Crosstown Blvd NW (pIN 12-32-24-14-0016), legally described on attachment A-2.
The property is zoned for R-l, Single Family Rural.
Applicable Ordinances
'\
Ordinance No.8, Section 4.11 states that before any house or other structure is moved
onto a vacant lot, the Planning Commission shall report to the City Council whether the
structure will be compatible with other development in the area, and conform to all
Andover City Codes and Ordinances. If the City Council concurs with the decision of the
Planning Commission that a structure would depreciate the area into which it is to be
moved, it may withhold issuance of a permit for such relocation.
'. /
Background
The applicant, Denise Deziel, proposes to move a 1,300 square foot, 1 3/4 story house
onto a vacant lot at 17051 Crosstown Blvd NW. The vacant lot was created through a lot
split granted in February, 1996 to Alan and Edna Brunkow, who have retained the parcel
to the east. The home was constructed in the City of Edina in 1939, and had an assessed
value of $1 00,000 at that location.
A 625 square foot expansion is planned for the home once on site that would include a
440 square foot attached garage. Assessed value for both land and buildings is estimated
to be between $150,000 and $200,000. The value compares favorably to other homes in
the area. Photographs of the existing home, the proposed expansion, and vacant lot appear
as attachment A-5.
Commission Options
\
,
/
)
Page Two
MP 96-01, Deziel
17051 Crosstown Blvd. NW
December 10, 1996
1. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City Council approval
of the relocation of structure request of Denise Deziel on property located at 17051
Crosstown Blvd. NW, legally described on attachment A-2. The Commission finds the
request meets the requirements of Ordinances No.8, Section 4.11.
2. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City Council denial of
the relocation of structure request of Denise Deziel on property located at 17051
Crosstown Blvd. NW, legally described on attachment A-2 . The Commission fmds the
request meets the requirements of Ordinances No.8, Section 4.11. In recommending
denial of the request, the Commission shall state those reasons for doing so.
3. The Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item pending further information
from Staff.
Staff Recommendation
/
Staff recommends approval of the relocation of structure as requested with the following
conditions:
1. That the relocated structure comply with all applicable City Ordinances including but
not limited to Ordinances No.4, 8, and 10.
2. That the relocated structure be subject to review of the Building Official and Fire
Marshall.
3. That the relocated structure shall be placed on a permanent foundation within (30)
thirty days of the issuance of building permit.
4. That the moving permit be subject to a sunset clause as defined in Ordinance No.8,
Section 5.03(d).
5. That the Building Department ascertain that the lot is buildable.
,
Attachments
A-I Resolution
A-2 Legal Description
A-3 Area Location Map
A-4 Site Location Map
A-5 Home, Proposed Addition and Site Photographs
A-6 Relocation of Structure Application
Attachment A-2
\
) Proposed Parcel Split
Legal Description
That part of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 12, Township 32,
Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4;
thence West along the North line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 a
distance of 550.65 feet to the point of intersection wit the center line of said
County Road No. 18 as it is now laid out and traveled; thence Southwesterly
along the center line of said County Road No. 18 a distance of 284.03 feet to the
point of beginning of the tract ofland to be herein described; thence continuing
along said center line of County Road No. 18 in a Southwesterly direction for a
distance of225.00 feet; thence Southeasterly along a line having a bearing of
South 46 degrees 35 minutes 14 seconds East a distance of 500.00 feet: thence
Northeasterly on a line parallel with the center line of said County Road 18 a
distance of225.00 feet; thence Northwesterly on a line parallel to the
Southeasterly line of this tract 500.00 feet to the point of beginning.
/
,
)
I
I
r-
I
l --
,
.
t-
i
I
------
I
I
I
i
\
/'
,
r
,
-
'I I
~./~
.-
-
/
w ! 1:
I
-1 I
I
I
I:
:'
I
"
,I
:1
I
\ I
,
- .--:z;
. 1;;OH '
~,:.
.j~c:::
#,OI,iDS1-; '--1
"\
-~
-'-1
1-----,;<
-,---
I
L
I:: ""TM........
=-' 177'fl'I AvE. NW
(1ITH AvL NW
IT5TH "vr.. NW
lT4TH AVE. NW
InRD AVE. NW
mHO AVE. NW
mS'1 AVL HW
_1M AVE. NW
I
.; I.,TM AVE. lOW
1!l9TH AVE. NW
-
158TH AvE. NW
....'-
~ ~7TH AVE. NW
~
I~TH AvE. NW
=..:4 d l5~TH "'vE. NoM
5\ ,~
>"..;(
81 ''''
~ i~ 15"TH AvE. NW
.:J
~..-,-,~...._..'-"
>l_ -.._~....--.;.~.--.....
-; 32, R. 24
1 .'''flS ;S A CO,'.lPll",:;,jN OF ~'=COIl:OS AS I
l'nCl' A.PPEA. ..... T"'fE ANOICA COUNTY
OFFICES A.FFECTJ".:; THE AREA SHOwN. i
THIS ORAW/Nt; IS TO BE USED OMY fOR
::EFERENCf ~'-'KPOSES ",NO THE COL'N.
ry 13 NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR "'NY 'N-
"'CCUUCIES HEREIN ':.:'NTAINED.
')OVER
...
.,
~_. '. .....--
,..~,.
...~..-?'.
I", .,
,\
2
PONDS
@
2
-,1-.
,;)
,.
I.','
l/~
" . t. .L
, ~t
~{(9)
.,
.,' , ~.
l~r;'
~'-I' .' -
::u -.'
Z
c:
,.... ,
. .
~I ". ":
~" . .~:
""
.,
'<)
.,.
.,,",,_J
~
,,;,,,!
:.<"
.,
..,)
J' '/)
~~
:.Q
y
...,
("
L
.L.
, .",---
~-
(,)
""'l:;..~
-.~
~
~.. . II
-'r)
]J ;:;
paN 0 }
-'.J
2:/
"~:"",. . ...._L~ ._..
,~~
:;
.~ ~
'l
)
@
@
S'-\f ~~ ,,) I
.. ._....i".... <....L~ .j
659/2
NECORNEII
SEC_12
"
':.
:1
~ ::J
~;I_;_'"
(A'""._"
......,.-
~u...
:.,,;-.-::t:.=
(.J
.
o
;.
.
/
€ 1/4 CORNER
SEC. 12
''-.-
23
.'
$i,.,jf
~ {~-).l
l-'; -,,4.e
MUsS"
5+''''''j..
i
fnl'6hfl}
I~ f1( 1~7
O..\d(h::"ti
I?L n,:(:~-(-7,~ 5
ft I ~
. l' I -
I..J. rf Ij~.~
\ --------::;-
---- "(,, /' /' - ." l- ." 'I{
35L{l .Jet'l r
C(/CL<F-- ~Lfc
, ~
'_ J
DtZlceA
prUpc-' Ad
H~Ihk!-,
Cvoscs-tcat)
Bruj
--l
\
~ :~1...:L
" SSEa -- "."\L,
' I . ... =
A'Y ~-''i'
~~-1;-r ,. ~--I~!~:I- .'-I-~--~~
~~ '~ :-:-~_:~~~L~ - ~; '--' --~
-----
-~-~~-=-~-=:~ .,-:-=-':_~.,"::""" - : ~ -
-=-._~ -
?;~ ~- --- ~
-.- -------
, .
-i-r . "-f;-
J '-/'.......
h~ Ij 1-
.- .....-
-- -
.- -
.'
.-.-....---;.1;1
___ .... _ b..
,-- ...
-~':_-,
.:.;........:....~-'.-
'1
b{.tdL ,~ I " ,- r-
oo i "LI ,-...1 I' r {;1 ",~;,l(
lee qLI_Cl-- -y.. L;-' " r '- I V _/J I, \ t"
S(~ 1'(._- {ll ~ C, r · ( '-....
-HC(,L<<~ k. IlL
/
:;o'~
'.
j
,,",,
.~ -
C. !
, ;"!.I
-/ , '- ,"",---'
" ' .
", L1 \ " ,-
I_ \ tl./.-'
c I.,
,)(h.._
0tCU.LCf' (.
,J ~
\,J L " <::.e,;.:.' J
I i. L ---' { / -/-
OJ
L S ;d-c-
... . -., .i"'"
CCcllJ \1- 0[- -
..)11C k
I
I
('.\
lie -
IV*
~
J
-'-s:
I
--..:....
,', i ;ij: +', "~
...........\.. .' I .,
" _1_-' ~:' i r,
{".;' 71,:; ..l.rl:-
LO,-~
)
&//11 cuill
bd11r/~-
["
L.:\..
~\~~
I
I" ,-\
I \..._l,'
,
/
- I"
-
i- .: J'T!
,.,~, _.~;..~
.)
"-. iy.
.) c....
.~ ~.
p~;l;~;~~:"'~''''-_'
:;; . ,
s..::~~~'~.~-=~ ~,.: ~.--- _.-
.'
~~~::--':"-
,".--.... -
" . .-
(;1
f-..; ~n
,
r....... ~ , -, .t +-
..) i : '..... -..1
( ~V~', \
\ 'J .)
.~~ :...:;.. f
i~~{{): i
'~.iJ."
......
J
~1 r J~l
! ... t.:y\
;" i"Uul-!
, J
I-..\" '- ..-
<1i~ \
~....c
)
,(tE~
~~.;'.~~.
L IT ifC (i'1
( IWUCc) I
C<. L(~
t. ""
Nt
/
\
.'
J
;,,"
}'.
. ~ ~
.,;
.; ,:'
"
I,
,\
n ,. . c,...
'-'\.1....1 ~ ,,)~
~'.L
-- i , .
~/ l1"'.(Lr
(Iv ]
LeI
C;-.
'6<' ( j ':' ,(f"
I.c~,:""_.....\...J'"
\"t...... ,1
5\
,
J Plan: AHP-9507
Classic Country
This country home features a classic exterior and a
luxurious interior design in an economicallloor plan.
Stylish windows brighten the spacioo IS IMng room,
where a handsome recessed fireplace crackles.
The dining room and the effICient kitchen share a
stylish sefVing bar.
The secluded master suite is graced by a 12-1l
cathedral ceiUng. A French door opens to a private
tenace.
,
,
BecIrcoms: 3
Living Area:
FIocn
Main Iloor
Other IloorlI
Total LMng Area
Standard basement
Footprint:
Width
Depth
Exterior wan Framing:
Foundation Options:
Crawlspace
FuU Basement
S"'b
Plan Category:
Traditional
Plan Style:
CountrylFarm~
Ranch
Special Features:
Fireplace
Porch
Patio
Main Floor Master Bedroom
Designer: American Home Plans
(All plans can be built with your c;hoil::e of foundation
and framing. A generic conversion diagram is
available.)
, BLUEPRINT PRICE CODE: A
Baths: 2FuD
1
1232 sq. Il
o sq. Il
1232 sq. Il
1183sq.1l
611l
361l
2x4, 2x6
)
.'
\
60'-4.
.
N
I
ic
C')
BED
12'-4.
ftrwplace ,.
IJVING Rll '\
19' x 13'-4.
hJlh eel.1la.
ORC
railiaa
First Floor Plan
.--
-7
i;
STORAGE
~
~.
...--
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
Existing location of structure
RELOCATE STRUCTURE
Property
Address
i~- 3'< -~4 -1'-/ -(jOlt;,
proposed location of structure
Type of Structure ~)1s..Sl-
, 1"~ I
~~~'Y'>J(
~fiJsl-rtiYI S1 uJ, I And otJ.Rr
Size of Structure
/k~J (~hry)
* * * * ..
Moving Contractor ~~+ lkl..t)e flb;p~
Address q~d) - CO 5111 t\J.Q.v\Lt-L txro/jJ/f) Rif~ rntJ 55'-/Lls
Phone No. tf.;?.s-d~ State License No. I
1Ion5(97 I1It/d ro
Proposed use of structure _liJ~ in
Route along which
rod! III do
structure will be moved
Iv 0I2y::;5h //7
, , ~
~. ~7( Qi'
AP~cant's 51 nature
Permit Fee:
fS.CD
Date Paid
f;)}., jCfb
Receipt
~
No0<,74:'75 \
All apvlications shall be made pursuant to the regulations set
forth 1n Ord1nance No.4 "Regulating the Moving of Buildings",
Ordinance No.8 "The zoning Ordinance", Section 4.11, Ordinance
No. 19 "Adopting the Uniform Building Code", and any applicable
State Law.
\
. I
DA:d'A 12/90
blh 6/1/94
EscrQ/J ArrOvl'1f $5Q]
Dcde. raid Id./L/jcib
receipt
6tt
I,j), OS 7-f 4 <z;.
, -
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
r \
,I
DATE: December 17. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Non-Discussion
Administration
Richard Fursman
ITEM NO.
Approve GIS Contract
33.
REQUEST:
The Andover City Council is requested to approve the GIS Contract as presented.
"
\ /
~~
"'.
12/11/95
08: 15
LAW OFFICES 2140 4TH AVE ~ 755 8923
NO. 142 ~02
j
.
CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Contract is made and entered into between the Tri-CitY GIS Joint
Powers Organization, consl:sting of the eitioll of Fridley, Columbia Heights end
Andover, hereinafter -Tri-City- and Plan Site Company, Suite 2, 1406 South
Greeley Street, Stillwater, Mlnnesote, hereinafter "Contractor."
WHEREAS. Tri-City requires services to be provided for the ~taffing of a GIS
Range Rider to provide GIS technical assistance to the Cities of Andover, Columbia
Heights and Fridley;
WHEREAS. Contractor desires to and is capable of providing the necessary
services according to the terms and conditions stated herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, fn consideration of tho mutual promises and agreements
contained herein the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM
1 .1 !.emu.
The term of this Contract shall be from January 1. 1997 to and including
December 31, 1997 unless earlier terminated by law or according to the
provisions of this Contract.
2. CONTRACTOR'S OBLIGATIONS
2.1 General Descriotion.
Contractor shall provide the following services generally described as:
Fifty weeks of full time onsiteGIS technical assistance to the communities
of Fridlev, Andover and Columbia Heights. The services will be in the
form of one or more GIS Range Riders that would spend an average of 50
- 60 hours per month in each community over the course of the Contract.
1
, l
12/11/95
08: 15
LRW OFFICES 2140 4TH RVE ~ 755 8923
NO. 142
[;103
2.2 Conformance to Soecification.
Services provided shall meet or exceed the tasks outlined In the Trl-Clty
GIS Technical Assistance Request for Proposal set out in Exhibit A which
is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
3. PAYMENT
3.1 Total Cost.
The total amount to be paid bV Trl-City pursuant to this Contract shall be
~40,OOO.OO.
3.2 Invoices.
Contrector shall, within fifteen (151 working days following the last day of
each calendar month in which services were provided, submit an Invoice
and request for payment on an invoice form acceptable to Tri-City.
This invoice shall itemize 1) the hours of services rendered listed by
classification, 2) the dete such services were provided, 3) a general
description of the services provided, 4) the name of client receiving
services, 5) the amount and type of all reimbursable expenses being
charged to the Contract, 6) the dates of the performance period covered
bV the invoice.
3.3 Time of Pavmlj!nt.
lri-City shall make payment to Contractor within thirty-five (35) days of
the date on which the invoice is received. 11 the invoice is incorrect,
defective, or otherwise Improper, Trl-City will notify Contractor within ten
(10) days of receiving the Incorrect invoice. Upon receiving thg corrected
2
12/11/96
08: 15
LAW OFFICES 2140 4TH AVE 7 755 8923
NO. 142 [;104
"
/
invoice from Contractor, Tri~City will make payment within thirty-fIVe (35)
days.
3.4 Payment of Unauthorized Claims.
Tri-City may refuse to pay any claim which is not specificaUy authorized by
thb Contract. Peyment of 0 claim shell not preclude Tri-City from
Questioning the proprietY of the cleim. Trl-Ciw reserves the right to offset
any overpayment or disallowance of claim by reducing future payments.
4. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS/STANDARDS
4.1 Gp.np.ral.
Contractor shall abide by all Federal, State or local laws, statutes,
ordinances, rules and regulations now in effect or hereinafter penaining to
this Contract or to the facilities, programs and staff for which Contractor
is responsible.
4.2 Minnesota Law to Govern.
This Comract shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
sUbstantiv~ and procedural laws of the State of MiMesota, without giving
effect to the principles of conflict of laws. All proceedings related to this
Contract shall be venued in the State of Minnesota.
5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS
Contractor is an independent contractor and nothing herein contained shall be
construed to create the relationship of employer and employee between Tri-City
and Contractor. Contractor shall at all times De free to exercise Initiative,
judgmont and discretion as to how to best perform or provide services.
Contractor acknowledges and agrees that Contractor is not entitled to receive
3
/
12/11/96
08: 15
LAW OFFICES 2140 4TH AVE ~ 755 8923
NO. 142
GJ05
any of the benefits received by Tri-City emplOYH$ and is not eligible for
. ;
workers' or unemployment compensation benefits. Contractor ilIICknoWkKtgH
and agrees that no withholding or deduction for State or Federal income taxes,
RCA, FUTA, or; otherwise, will be made from the payments due Contractor and
that it is Contractor's sole obligation to comply with the applicable provisions
of all Federal and State tax laws.
6. IND~MNlFl~ATlON
Any and all claims that arise or may arise on behalf of Contractor, Its agents.
servants or employees as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of
Contractor or its agents, servants, employees while engaged in the
performance of the Contract shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility
of Trl-Clty. COntractor shall Indemnify, hold harmless and defend Trl-Clty, Its
members. officers and employees against any and all liability, loss. costs.
I damages, expenses, claims or actions, including attorneys' fees which Tn-City,
il$ officers or employees may herei:lfter sustain, incur or be required to pay,
arising out of or by reason of any negligent or willful act or omission of
Contractor. its agents, servants or employees, In the execution, perfonnance,
or failure to adequately perform Contractor's obligations pursuant to this
Contract.
7. INSURANCE
7.1 General Terms.
In order to protect itself and to protect Tri-City under the indemnity
provisions set forth above Contractor shaU, at Contractor's expense,
procure end m8intain policies of insurance covering the term of this
Contract, as set forth below. Such policies of insurance shall apply to the
4
12/11/96
08: 15
LRW OFFICES 2140 4TH RVE ~ 755 8923
NO. 142
[;106
\
)
extent of, but not as a limitation upon or In satisfaction of, the indemnity
provisions herein. All retentions and deductibles under such policies of
insurance shall be pald by Contractor. Each such policy shall not be
canceled by the Issuing Insurance company without at least ten nO) days
written notice to Trl.Clty of Intent to cancel.
7.2 Coverage.
The policies of Insurance to be obtained by Contractor pursuant to this
section shall be purchased from 8 licensed carrier and shall include the
following: ,
A) Professional liability
(1 ) A professional liability Insurance policy covering personnel of
Contractor, if any. who provide professiOnal services under this
Contract, which shall include the following coverages at a
,
/
minimum:
Personallnjury/Dsmage:
. 200,000 per person
$ 600,000 per occurrence
B) Workers' Compensation
If applif;able, Contractor shall prOGure and maintain a policy that et
least meets the statutory minimum.
7.3 Certificates.
Prior to or conc;urrent with e~ecution of this Contl'oct, Contractor shall file
certificates or certified copie& of such palicies of insurance with Tri-City.
5
12/11/96
08: 15
LRW OFFICES 2140 4TH RVE ~ 755 8923
NO. 142
[;107
/
7.4 Failure to Provide Proof of Insurance.
Trl-CIty may withhold payments or Immediately terminate this Contract for
failure of Comractor to furnish proof of Insurance coverage or to comply
with the insurance requirements as stated above.
7.5 Non-waiver.
Nothing In this Contract shaU constitute a waiver by Tri-City of any
statutory limits or exceptions on liability.
8. SUBCONTRACTJN~
Contractor shall not enter Into any subcontract for the performance of the
services contemplated under this Contract nor assign any interest in the
Contrect without prior written conaent of Tri-City.
9. DEFAULT
/
9.1 Inabilltv to ~edorm.
Contractor: shall make every reasonable effort to maintain staff, facilities.
and equipment to deliver the services to be purchased by Tn-City.
Contractor shall immediately notify Trl-City in writing whenever it is unable
to. or reasonablv believes it Is going 10 be unable to.. provide the agreed
upon quality of services. Upon such notification, Tri-City shall determine
whether such inability requires a modification or cancellation of this
. ,
Contract.
9.2 Duty tn Mitioate.
Both parties shall use their best efforts to mitigate any damages which
might be" suffered by reason of any event giving rise to a remedy
hereunder.
6
12/11/96
08:15
LAW OFFICES 2140 4TH AVE ~ 755 8923
NO. 142
[;108
/
10, TERMIr,lATIO~
"
10.1 With or Without Cause.
Th~ Contract mey be terminated. with or without cause. by Tri-City
upon thirty (301 days written notice.
10.2 Notice of Default.
Either party may terminate this Contract for cause by giving ten (10)
days written notice of its intent. Said notice shall specify the
circumstances warranting termination of this Contract.
10.3 Failure to Cure.
If the party in default falls to cure the specified circumstances as
described by the notice given under the above paragraph within the ten
C 1 0) days. or such additional time as may be authorized by the party
giving notice, then the whole or any part of this Contract may be
terminated by wrinen notice.
10.4 Notice of Termination.
Notice of Termination shall be made by certified mail or personal
delivery to the authorized agent of the party. Notice of Termination Is
deemed effective upon delivery to the address of th9 party as stated in
paragraph 12.
10.5 Effect of TermInation.
Termination of this Contract shall not discharge any liability.
responsibility or riaht of any party which arises from the performance of
or failure to adequately perform the terms of this Contract prior to the
effective date of termination.
7
, ,
12/111'96
08:15
LRW OFFICES 2140 4TH RVE 7 755 8923
NO. 142
[;109
, /
11. CONTRACT RIGHTSIREMEDfES
11.1 Riabts Cumulative.
All remedies available to either party under the terms of this Contract
or by law are cumulative and may be exercised concurrently or
separately, and the exercise of anyone remedy shall not be deemed i:1n
election of such remedy to the exclusion of other remedies.
11.2 Waiver.'
Waiver for any default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any
subsequent default. Waiver of breach of any provision of this Contract
shall not be construed to be modification for the terms of this Contract
unless stated to be such io writing. and signed by authorized
representatives of Tri-City and Contractor.
12. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
j
Notification required to be provided pursuant to this Contract 5hall be
provided to the following named persons and addresses unless otherwise
stated in this Contract, or in a modification of this Contract.
To Contractor:
To Tri-City:
Richard Fursman
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd
Andover, MN 55304
Jerry Happel
Suite 2
1406 South Greeley Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
13. MODIFICATIONS
Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of the provisions of this
Contract shall only be valid when they hilve been reduced to writing. Clnd
signed by authorized representatives of Tri-City and Contractor.
8
j
12/11/96
08:15
LAW OFFICES 2140 4TH AVE 7 755 8923
NO. 142 [;110
i
14. SEVERABILITY
The provisions of this Contract shaD be deemed severable. If any part of this
Contract is re.ndered void. invalid, or urmnforceable, such rendering shall not
affect the validity and enforceability of the remainder of this Contract unless
the pan or parts which are void, invalid or otherwise unenforceable shall
substantially impair the value of the entira Contract with respect to either
party .
16. MERGER
15.1 Final AgrMment.
This ,Contract is the final expression of the agreement of the parties
and the complete and exclusive st6tement of the tenns agreed upon,
and shall supersede all prior negotiations, understandings or
agreements. There are not representations, warranties, or stipulations,
either oral or written, not herein contained.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the panies hereto have executed this Contract on
the date(s) Indicated below.
/
.
TRI-CITY GIS ORGANIZATION
By:
Title:
Date:
CONTRACTOR
By:
Title~ Prl~sidAnt
Date:
BV:
Title:
Date!
9
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
, /
DATE: December 17. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Non-Discussion
Administration
Pat Janssen
ITEM NO.
Request:
The Andover City Council is requested to order bids for modular furniture for the new City Hall.
Background:
City staff has met with a number of office furniture dealers. Attached are copies of 3 (three) typical
office scenarios that were prepared by DesignWise, Inc. If the City Council approves the request to
/ order bids on these typicals, the company that gets the bid will be doing a final needs analysis to
determine what furniture each individual will need so we can incorporate existing furniture with the
new.
,
/
/
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. -96
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR
PROJECT NO. 94-30A ,FOR Furniture Contract for New City Hall.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby approve ordering advertisement for bid.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids
to be opened at 10:00 AM . January 6 , 19 97 at the Andover City
Hall.
)
MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 17th day of December , 19 96 , with
Councilmembers voting in
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
said resolution was declared passed.
voting against, whereupon
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: December 17.1996
AGENDA SECTION
Non-Discussion/Consent Item
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Scott Erickson,~t
Engineering
ITEM NO.
~~ard Bid/96-28/Well #3 Maintenance
8u.
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting bids and awarding the
contract to Alberg Water Services in the amount of $29,622.00 for Project 96-28, Well #3
Maintenance.
The bids received are as follows:
Contractor
Alberg Water Services
E.H. Renner & Sons
Bergerson Caswell
J Keys Well Drilling Co.
Bid Amount
$29,622.00
$30,463.00
$35,004.00
$38,062.00
The funding for this project was budgeted in the 1996 Public Works Operating Budget for the
Water Department.
\
)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 96-28 FOR WELL #3 MAINTENANCE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in Council
Resolution No. 251-96 ,dated November 6 , 1996, bids were received, opened
and tabulated according to law with results as follows:
Alberg Water Services
E.H. Renner & Sons
Bergerson Caswell
Keys Well Drilling Co.
$29,622.00
$30,463.00
$35,004.00
$38,062.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover
to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate Alberg Water Services as being the
apparent low bidder.
\
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk to enter
into a contract with Alberg Water Services in the amount of $29.622.00 for
construction of the improvements; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the
next lowest bidder shall be retained until the contract has been executed and bond
requirements met.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 17th day of December ,1 9~, with
Councilmembers
the resolution, and Councilmembers
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
voting in favor of
voting
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
J.E. McKelvey - Mayor
/
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
0 0 0
l 0 ~ 0
~ N M
0 CO CO
0 q ~
uf CO 0
M M M
~ ~ ~
,
,
;
0:::
w
>
o
c
z
<(
u.
o
~
o
w
coO
NZ
,<(
COz
~W
01-
ZZ
1-<(
O:!!i
WM
"''1:1:
O...J
O:::...J
c..w
~
I-
CI)
...J
Z
o
i=
<(
o
u.
o
W
c..
CI)
~
Z
<(
...J
c..
11~
}}}"O, N
I It! ....
~
~
~
co
Q)
I
o
....
I
N
....
co
Q)
I
Q)
I
N
....
co
Q)
I
o
....
I
N
....
.... ....
N r--
.... CO
C? ~
Q) CO
r-- ~
~ CO
N N
.... ....
CO CO
- -
o
o
....
CO
I
r--
N
~
N
....
CO
-
Q) .
o ~ ~ 0
M 1I)..lil:~ M
~M~II)c..O M
Z II) CI) C .... II)
II) ZOIl)~1I)
~ Z .!'!! :!!i c, II) CI) Z
... ~CZ0,"=,
. :!!i Ui C._ .- 0:::
~ - ::I'; ~:!!i [: ~
::... -... ClI'"
J:Q)'Cc.....J-=..,Q)
> C .::1 >
o .- - Q) Z ClI CO .-
oO:::II)c.. c..coO:::
~~:::1~~~~
....WII)o:::~CI)....w
o
Q)
U
.~ Q)
Q) ~
CI) 0
... ClI
Q) 0
..
ClI C
~-~
C) Q) ...
... > ...
Q)Q)C)
..a"'"
- CI) Q)
<(-m
o
o 0
C) C
C 0
CI)
=E ~
C_~
_0_
- >--
~Q)C_
>::S::Q)'"
o :t: 0::: g,
>-Q)Z;O
Q).., .0:::
::s::-W-
o
o
c
~
en
::::i
CIO
N
CD
en
@
@
@
" -Petition to stop development of Bill's Superette
@
We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Andover City Council to stop the pending
development of Bill's Superette, Lot one, Block six, Hills of Bunker lake 3rd addition, as
it will adversely impact our property values, impact the safety of residents and children
with the increased traffic, and impact the adjacent ponding system and the environment
with the removal of all trees. We strongly believe that this is not an appropriate
development in a residential neighborhood.
Name
~
Address
Telephone
(j)
~ .
/l
@ ~ 7k
;4
JQ C ~
reJc j/)
. Petition to stop development of Bill's Superette
We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Andover City Council to stop the pending
development of Bill's Superette, lot one, Block six, Hills of Bunker lake 3rd addition, as
it will adversely impact our property values, impact the safety of residents and children
with the increased traffic, and impact the adjacent ponding system and the environment
with the removal of all trees. We strongly believe that this is not an appropriate
development in a residential neighborhood.
""
\It,
Name
Address
Telephone
98'''' /.5. 9 -VI L N.
VI. - 139'117 ~
7-5-7 - /S~
157-7S-9'
7sy -7<-t'3l.
~.,.)n.sl/ II hfJ
S,J-f1Jw 7jy_)Ir..g
\ ~r ~1..,r-'
W /'::;':"'--5','.1"
7&' .:f4:~J
7.,'LJ-;J;; /
jJ7J'(
J.~ C; '3 (I
/'). -
'/J LVUJ i M' ..t"'r jJ...J
IS"" -si:..
, S7 -LS 7 j'-
57 031;;-
.Petition to stop development of Bill's Superette
We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Andover City Council to stoo the pending
development of Bill's Superette, Lot one, Block six, Hills of Bunker Lake 3rd addition, as
it will adversely impact our property values, impact the safety of resideqts and children
with the increased traffic, and impact the adjacent ponding system and the environment
with the removal of all trees. We strongly believe that this is not an appropriate
development in a residential neighborhood.
Name
Address
.Petition to stop development of Bill's Superette
We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Andover City Council to stop the pending
development of Bill's Superette, lot one, Block six, Hills of Bunker lake 3rd addition, as
it will adversely impact our property values, impact the safety of residents and children
with the increased traffic, and impact the adjacent ponding system and the environment
with the removal of all trees. We strongly believe that this is not an appropriate
development in a residential neighborhood.
\SL10 \3ct-+t-o
Telephone
I~~lp ,--
Name
Address
/"" .....; I.....;~ /
' ;' :,- /'(- /) /
/ ;'.'
L---j" -?-/"-'
7) ~/:-.lt7
, 10 ') I
I) ~ S- 'J.. W jt-J~c
/ 5 voW: I] -I Pr .
/ .3.f>(/
7t.-.
L,Y1 L
(; ;Zb5J
7 ~- 1/- 3JP
7~5s-YJ7S
y<,-
7)~- )h/
.l 1. CJ.
Petition to stop development of Bill's Superette
We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Andover City Council to stop the pending
development of Bill's Superette, lot one, Block six, Hills of Bunker lake 3rd addition, as
it will adversely impact our property values, impact the safety of residents and children
with the increased traffic, and impact the adjacent ponding system and the environment
with the removal of all trees. We strongly believe that this is !!!!! an appropriate
development in a residential neighborhood.
Name
Address
Telephone
lif34 13'6~ LA NtJ
13 (;-r1-1-A )...I,vI.!
757'iN'f D
.......,5.7~g4LfO
7)~ - -tC?
'7~7-/. ~j. 7
7slf -'[370
.Petition to stop development of Bill's Superette
We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Andover City Council to stop the pending
development of Bill's Superette, Lot one, Block six, Hills of Bunker Lake 3rd addition, as
it will adversely impact our property values, impact the safety of residents and children
with the increased traffic, and impact the adjacent ponding system and the environment
with the removal of all trees. We strongly believe that this is not an appropriate
development in a residential neighborhood.
Name
Address
I,
l....l ,IJ!"// :'./-. ../ IV
I
to;/l 1<-.. l b1...
/~::l:)" /-Y'c,.?,? ~
/f'C/~ ;~ (,J
/otlr fLit /'1-.. L.. NkJ
101G' / '-{ (j(1\ IJ. IV kJ
\
It\~i.., ~\~ \LX'
L
Telephone
75t/- ~
) b 7 - )' 77 /
J - '6/~
5 )-'1SI:r
757/S4u
75-7IJ}i)
?C?..7JP
15;- 79;
7C;-~ - '762.....6
',$L1. (ot{Jl
'lS'5-T!~ :;'{
. Petition to stop development of Bill's Superette
We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Andover City Council to stop the pending
development of Bill's Superette, lot one, Block six, Hills of Bunker lake 3rd addition, as
it will adversely impact our property values, impact the safety of residents and children
with the increased traffic, and impact the adjacent ponding system and the environment
with the removal of all trees. We strongly believe that this is not an appropriate
development in a residential neighborhood.
Name
Address
Telephone
....
~ / / // ~ <;;. ~r
" ~~/S4i-/""-/< J3'6~9 bnf1'/~ -7 S:~- 3(;, 30
_ /r-- i.~_
/
. Petition to stop development of Bill's Superette
We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Andover City Council to stop the pending
development of Bill's Superette, lot one, Block six, Hills of Bunker lake 3rd addition, as
it will adversely impact our property values, impact the safety of residents and children
with the increased traffic, and impact the adjacent ponding system and the environment
with the removal of all trees. We strongly believe that this is not an appropriate
development in a residential neighborhood.
Name
Address
Telephone
IS?S
155/6
3~ fA Lmlc?
/ 3d ~ NW
)3rf/~ ~1U. )UiU
13b77 Dvd-tc- 9. N W
55-5tr22-
7S5- 22
707 -() to .f 3
ST t\ll..u
iI", ,-} .
G' -'/:f(.7 A\, c,c......
- '..... ~, r
Petition to stop development of Bill's Superette
We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Andover City Council to stoo the pending
development of Bill's Superette, Lot one, Block six, Hills of Bunker Lake 3rd addition, as
it will adversely impact our property values, impact the safety of residents and children
with the increased traffic, and impact the adjacent ponding system and the environment
with the removal of all trees. We strongly believe that this is not an appropriate
development in a residential neighborhood.
Name
Address
Telephone
1,f^-L0VR.J0uJ 4crD- ~'-I~
;;
.:1vc'" "A/v,/
'757- 9f;77
i 341/' 4V1v /.J l;J
\5\8' \J~LA~~NU0
755 -~'
i5S ,._~~
".,j
- Petition to stop development of Bill's Superette
We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Andover City Council to stop the pending
development of Bill's Superette, lot one, Block six, Hills of Bunker lake 3rd addition, as
it will adversely impact our property values, impact the safety of residents and children
with the increased traffic, and impact the adjacent ponding system and the environment
with the removal of all trees. We strongly believe that this is not an appropriate
development in a residential neighborhood.
N..nie
I
!
Telephone
"-J0
138~ ~.1tftw
~' 'LJ,' . Petition to stop development of Bill's Superette />{r
:.' Jir);r.?
J1 {v We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Andover City Council to lli!I! the pending ,rf
development of Bill's Superette, lot one, Block six, Hills of Bunker lake 3rd addition, as A
it will adversely impact our property values, impact the safety of residents and children v
with the increased traffic, and impact the adjacent ponding system and the environment
with the removal of all trees. We strongly believe that this is not an appropriate
development in a residential neighborhood.
Name
Address
Telephone
107-{f} 0
S-7- 2/9
79(- '31
7S"lf--3/ ~ ~
? S-~ 5.:2-0 ?"
'75'1- 7.;25:L
( ,
, l
, ,
/)j
I k 4-1]
/ 'v
/'15K
.,
u
...,
LJ
...,
u
..,
FEASIBiliTY REPORT
lJ
-,
L..J
.,
L..J
,
TRUNK UTILITIES
TO WOODLAND ESTATES
u
.,
L..J
.,
L..J
~
CITY PROJECT 96-26
CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
-,
LJ
LJ
-,
;..j
---,
L..J
-,
L..J
-,
LJ
December 17, 1996
Camm. Na.11235
,
L.J
TKDA
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
...,
L..J
ENGINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS
1500 PIPER JAFFRA Y PLAZA
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-2140
PHONE:6121292-4400 FAX:6121292-0083
L..J
1
u
...,
-....J
-,
-....J
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
...,
DECEMBER 17, 1996
u
..
L..J
'-'
.J
FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR
TRUNK UTILITIES
TO WOODLAND ESTATES
CITY PROJECT 96-26
CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
COMMISSION NO. 11235
...,
....J
....,
'-.J
~-,
-.J
...,
...J
-.
--J
. ,
~J
..
-.J
I hereby certify that this Feasibility Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I
am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
...,
w
...,
l1l~ffl ~
Ffichard M, Odland, P,E.
Registration No. 23763
-.J
"
w
....,
....J
--,
....J
'1
-.J
.,
...J
11235
..-,
L..J
..-,
~J
u
..-,
L..J
....,
L..J
Location
..-,
--J
Initiation
--,
L..J
Feasibility
-,
Right-of-way/Easements
-....J
Permits
--,
....J
..
Completion Date
-....J
....,
Estimated Project Costs
....J
--,
Project Schedule
-.J
Preliminary Cost Estimate
-;
Location Map
....J
...,
-1
~,
L..J
--,
-1
-,
-1
-,
-.J
--,
-.J
TRUNK UTILITIES
TO WOODLAND ESTATES
CITY PROJECT 96-26
Table of Contents
South 1/2 of Southwest 1/4 of Section
22, T32 W, R24W
Council Action
Project is Feasible
No Easements Required
Anoka County Highway Department
MPCA, MCWS, Minnesota Department
of Health
May 31,1997
$407,550.00
Woodland Estates Share -$1,170.00
11235
Paqe
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
4,5
...,
-....J
-,
--1
FEASIBILITY REPORT
TRUNK UTILITIES
TO WOODLAND ESTATES
CITY PROJECT 96-26
'-1
--,
...,
'-.J
Location
-1
The proposed project covers trunk sanitary sewer and trunk watermain located in the
South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22.
--,
...,
Improvements
-1
1. Sanitary Sewer
--,
..-,
An 18" sanitary sewer is to be extended to the west along the south side of
Crosstown Boulevard (C.SAH. No. 18), then to the north along the west side of
Nightingale Street (County Road No.1 09),
L..J
-1
-,
An 8" sanitary sewer is to be extended to the west to serve the proposed
Woodland Estates Project (see attached exhibit).
-.J
..
It is proposed to jack a 30" steel casing pipe under Crosstown Boulevard to avoid
closing down Crosstown Boulevard for construction.
-....J
--,
The 18" sanitary sewer proposed will carry enough capacity to ultimately serve
the gravity service district to County Road 20 at Nightingale Street.
-....J
-,
2. Watermain
_1
-~
A 12" watermain is to be constructed parallel to the proposed 18" sanitary sewer
as shown on the attached exhibit.
-1
...,
It is proposed to jack a 22" steel casing pipe under Crosstown Boulevard to avoid
closing down Crosstown Boulevard for Construction.
-1
Initiation
...,
'-.J
The project was initiated by Andover City Council action.
...,
Feasibility
-1
The project is feasible.
--,
-1
RiQht of Way/Easements
-,
Utility easements will not be required.
-1
--,
1
11235
'-.J
-,
'-.J
.--,
u
Permits
.--,
-....J
Permits will be required from the Anoka County Highway Department for work within
County Highway right-of-way, from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA),
the Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services (MCWS) for Sanitary Sewer extensions,
from the Minnesota Department of Health for Watermain extensions.
.--,
L..J
....,
-....J
Completion
...,
Completion date for the project is May 31, 1997.
-....J
Estimated Project Cost
...,
...,
Attached to this report is a detailed estimate of construction costs for the improvements.
The costs quoted herein are estimated only, based on current construction prices, and
are not guaranteed, Final contracts will be awarded on a unit price basis. The
contractor will be paid only for work completed.
-1
-l
-,
Total Estimated Project
u
Estimated Construction Cost
--,
-....J
Sanitary Sewer and Restoration
Watermain
$258,000.00
55.500.00
.--,
-....J
Total Estimated Construction Cost
$313,500.00
--,
- 1
Engineering
Administration
Bonding
City Expenses
Testing
Construction Interest
Miscellaneous
62,700.00
9,500.00
1,600.00
5,000.00
3,000.00
4,500.00
7.750.00
-....J
....J
..
u
-,
*Total Estimated Project Cost
$407,550.00
-1
*Project costs to be paid from City of Andover Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Watermain
-, Fund.
-.J
-,
-1
...,
-1
.--,
2
11235
-....J
-,
-1
...,
...J
PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE
...,
-1
Trunk Utilities
To Woodland Estates
City Project 96-26
City of Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 11235
--,
~~
...,
-....J
u
1. City Council Receives Feasibility Report December 17,1997
2. City Council Orders Project and Authorizes
Engineering to Prepare Plans and Specifications December 17, 1996
3. Engineer Submits Plans for Council Approval and
Receives Authorization to Advertise for Bids February 4, 1997
4. Advertise in Official Newspaper February 7 and 14, 1997
5, Advertise in Construction Bulletin February 7 and 14, 1997
6. Open Bids February 28, 1997
7. City Council Receives Bids and Awards Contract March 18, 1997
8. Contractor Begins Construction April 15, 1997
9, Contractor Completes Construction May 31, 1997
.--,
...J
.--,
...J
...,
-1
...,
l~J
....,
_ J
..
..
-....J
...,
u
...,
u
-,
-....J
--,
..J
...,
-....J
--,
--1
...,
3
11235
..J
....,
-....J
--,
w
--,
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
Trunk Utilities
To Woodland Estates
City Project 96-26
City of Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 11235
'-.J
...,
L..J
....,
-....J
TRUNK SANITARY SEWER
-,
'-.J
Item
No. Description
Unit
Price
Quantity
--,
-....J
1 Mobilization
2 Connect to Existing Sewer
*3 8" DIP
4 18" PVC ASTM F679 WT 0.536"
5 30" Steel Casing Pipe
6 Standard 4 Dia. Manhole 10' Depth
7 Extra Depth Manhole
8 Outside Drop
9 Trench Stabilization Rock
10 Televising
11 Traffic Control
12 Rem/Rep. Exist. Sprinkler System
13 Seeding
14 Topsoil Borrow
Subtotal
1,00 LS $10,000.00
1.00 LS 5,000.00
30,00 LF 30.00
1250.00 LF 110.00
100,00 LF 300.00
6.00 EA 1,400.00
100.00 LF 80.00
1.00 EA 1,100,00
1000.00 LF 6.00
1300.00 LF 1.00
1.00 LS 5,000.00
1.00 LS 7,500.00
4,00 AC 900.00
2200,00 CY 7.00
...,
-....J
--,
'-.J
--,
~J
..
-....J
....,
u
...,
Contingencies
-....J
Total Estimated Construction Cost - Trunk Sanitary Sewer
...,
-1
*Woodland Estates Share:
....,
LJ
30.00 LF - 8" DIP @ $30.00/LF = $900,00
$900.00 X 1.3 = $1,170.00
...,
-.J
...,
;..j
...,
-1
...,
4
~J
Amount
$10,000,00
5,000.00
900.00
137,500.00
30,000.00
8,400.00
8,000.00
1,100.00
6,000.00
1,300,00
5,000.00
7,500.00
3,600.00
15,400.00
$239,700.00
$18,300,00
$258,000.00
11235
..,
~
..
LJ
...,
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
Trunk Utilities
To Woodland Estates
City Project 96-26
City of Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 11235
~
..,
-....J
..
u
TRUNK WATERMAIN
...,
L..J
Item
No. Description
Unit
Quantity Price
1.00 LS $1,000,00
1500,00 LF 22.00
40.00 LF 15,00
50.00 LF 140.00
1,00 EA 800.00
4.00 EA 425,00
4.00 EA 1,200,00
1250.00 LB 2,00
...,
1 Connect to Existing Watermain
2 12" DIP Class 50 Watermain
3 6" DIP Class 50 Watermain
4 22" Steel Casing Pipe
5 12" MJ Butterfly Valve
6 6" MJ Gate Valve
7 Hydrant
8 MJ DIP Fittings
Subtotal
u
..,
-....J
..,
LJ
..,
LJ
Contingencies
..
Total Estimated Construction Cost - Trunk Watermain
LJ
...,
LJ
...,
u
...,
w
..,
u
...,
\.-1
...,
;..j
...,
-....J
..,
5
\.-J
11235
Amount
$1,000.00
33,000,00
600.00
7,000,00
800.00
1,700.00
4,800,00
2,500.00
$ 51,400,00
$4,100.00
$55,500.00
- - - - - - -
- - - - -
- - - -
- - -
---------------
-------..-------
/' -
/' -r---
/' --- ---
/ ~ ~ -----------------
0; ~' ,,/
/ / r NlClll1EN<lAl.E ST. NW (co. AD. 109)
. / /'
/ /' ,
/ / '
:1:/-,
/ I
/ N. /
/ / N I
~ I
I
(J)
(J)
-l
-l
fT1
fT1
fT1
fT1
r
r
()
0 ,
)>
)> I
(J)
(J) I
z
z
G)
G)
\J ,
\J
,
\J
\J
fT1
fT1
,
,
I
,
,
I
,
,
I
I
I
1
,
,
I
.
,
,
,
-' \
~
, .
,
.l \
,
I
r \
'"
~
<I
~ ,
,
~ \
,
I
. I
I \
I
I
\
I
,
\
,
,
~
\
0 t-3
,
I
)> 0 ~
\
86 \J~ ~" -. .
I
;;::0 2l~ Zj;
,
s:: < (j)
. fTlo L ~ -
:;;0 - fTl CD
Z v -I 0 t::t t-3 j=
.
,
9 s::-< -I O~ ~
\
.... -0 (() t-3
.... z.,., (j) t:rj too-o4 (j) -'
DATE
December 17 1996
lIEMSGIVENTOTHE CITYCOUNCII..
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - November 26 1996
City Council Minutes - December 3. 1996
Special City Council Minutes - December 4. 1996
Truth-In-Taxation Minutes - December 4 1996
Letter from Wayne Nelson Met Council - November 26 1996
Letter from Jean Hanson MPCA - December 2 1996
Regional Capital Planning & Management for Local Governments
Feasibility Report - Well #6
Feasibility Report - Woodland Estates
Schedule of Bills
~ ~=n~~o?t~~~~~~nn~~~::~~!e
c ,c.... (~/7li'
November 26, 1996
~ ~\
: -~ :"--"'"\. ";.':" ~- ?;.' ~,
Richard Fursman, City Administrator
Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
)
Dear Mr. Fursman:
Thank you for submitting a grant application for Tax Base Revitalization Account
funding of a polluted site cleanup. Unfortunately, your city is not participating in the
Metropolitan Livable Communities Housing Incentives Program, which is established in
MN Statutes Chapter 473.252 as an eligibility requirement.
While I was not able to conduct a thorough review of the application, it appeared to be
otherwise eligible. It would likely have achieved a low ranking due to a relatively small
increase in projected net tax capacity and the need to extend public infrastructure. In a
funding cycle not fully subscribed or with only a few proposals outside the center cities,
however, it may have qualified for funding.
I hope your city will reconsider participating in the Housing Incentives Program. This
program encourages cities to plan their future growth to accommodate a diversity of
housing types and affordability levels consistent with their employment and residential
population.
Sincerely,
N~ )J~
Wayne Nelson
TBRA Administrator
230 East FIfth Street Sl. Paul. Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TDD/TIY 291-0904 Metro Info Une 229-3780
An Equal Opportunity Employer
~..
L
c. C. ~5 1:1-(17(9.4'
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
December 2, 1996
RECEIVED
DEe 0 3 1996
CITY OF ANDOVER
Ms. P. Colleen Herrmann
Assistant County Attorney
County of Anoka
2100 Third Avenue
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
RE: Notice of Future Construction at the WDE Landfill
Dear Ms. Herrmann:
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) by this letter is notifying Anoka
County (County) that MPCA is planning on construction of an additional corrective action
at the WDE Landfill some time during the summer of 1997, MPCA is required by the
Binding Agreement to: 1) notify you of future construction and, 2) provide advance
notice, explanations and an opportunity to comment on any significant modification to the
remedy.
The MPCA site team is proposing installation of an active gas extraction system, The
main reason for doing so is to remediate the ground water more effectively and efficiently
in a shorter period of time than the present ground water pumpout system is able to
address. We are hopeful that by shortening the present system's operation time and being
able to discharge treated ground water into Coon Creek we would greatly reduce the
State's cost of operating the system. In addition, this would also reduce the possibility of
odors and landfill gases impacting the nearby residents,
MPCA is presently preparing to issue a request to three or five consulting firms who will
submit a proposal to do the design and construction oversight for the project, We are
planning on sending this request out in January 1997, Prior to finalizing the design, we
will arrange a meeting with the County staff who are interested in providing comments for
this project. I will contact you at that time to arrange the meeting (around April).
520 Lafayette Rd. N.; 81. Paul, MN 55155-4194; (612) 296-6300 (voice); (612) 282-5332 (TTY)
Regional Offices: Duluth. Brainerd. Detroit Lakes. Marshall. Rochester
Equal Opportunity Employer. Printed on recycled paper containing at least 10% fibers from paper recycled by consumers.
I..
Ms. P. Colleen Herrmann
Page 2
December 2, 1996
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 612/296-7390,
Sincerely,
J~
Project Manager
Administrative Assistance Closure Unit
Solid Waste Section
Ground Water and Solid Waste Division
JH:lek
cc: Dick Fursman, City of Andover
Alan Williams, Attorney General's Office
~
C.c.. M-t-S' p.j/7ilC.
Standard & Poor's presents:
Regional Capital Planning and Management for Local Governments
Thursday, December 19, 1996
Marriott Bloomington, Mall of America
2020 East 79th Street
Bloomington, Minnesota
RECEIVED
DEe 0 9 1996
CITY OF ANDOVER
Local governments are challenged increasingly to enhance service delivery with limited financial resources, Join
Standard & Poor's and experts from the public and private sector, in a discussion of regional cooperation in tax-sharing,
capital budgeting and debt management. The speakers will address the regional economic and financial challenges which
make capital planning unique in Minnesota. Discussions will identify the broad political and institutional constraints and
make practical recommendations for successfully achieving infrastructure goals.
8:00 a.m. Registration/Coffee Service
Martha Larson, Director of
Finance, City of Saint Paul
Dr. David Wettergren, Superintendent,
Stillwater School District
Patrick Hentges, City Manager,
City of Mankato
Daniel O'Neill, Executive
Vice President, Springsted, Inc.
8:30 a,m, Welcome & Introduction
Sarah Eubanks, Director,
Standard & Poor's, Chicago
8:45 a.m. The Regional Economic Environment
& Challenges
· Competitive issues
· Role of the public sector
· Economic alternatives
· Benefits of interdependency
· Coordinated approach
Lyle Wray, Executive Director,
Citizens League
Paul Anton, President,
Anton & Associates
11:00 a. m. The Coordinated Capital and
Debt Management Plan
. Organization and use
. Debt structuring
David MacGillivray, Principal,
Springsted, Inc.
9:45 a.m. Coffee Break
11:30 a.m, Regional Credit Considerations
· Credit ratings outlook for the region
· Factors supporting stronger ratings
. Comparisons to other regions
Joseph O'Keefe, Director,
Standard & Poor's, Chicago
10:00 a,m. Practical Efforts in Regional
Capital Planning
· Components of coordinated regional
capital planning and debt management
· Professional perspectives
John Moir, Director of Finance,
City of Minneapolis
12:00 p,m. Luncheon: Legislative Issues Overview
Wayne Simoneau, Commissioner of
Finance, State of Minnesota
Registration Infonnation: A non-refundable $20 registration fee per person, Pre-registration is mandatory. Simply
complete the registration form and return it to us with payment in the enclosed envelope, or fax your registration to
(212) 208-0076 and forward payment separately. For additional information, please call Donna DiGrandi at
(212) 208-1999.
REGIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING REGISTRATION FORM
Please enter _ reservation(s) for the December 19, 1996 conference in Minnesota.
The registration fee of $20 per person is enclosed.
Please type or print:
Name (I)
Additional Attendees:
Title
2.
Company
3.
Address
4.
City
5.
State
Zip
6.
Telephone
Fax
..,
u
...,
L..J
...,
u
...,
L.J
FEASIBILITY REPORT
.,
u
n
L..J
WELL AND PlTMPHOUSE NO.6
..,
L..J
CITY OF ANDOVER, IvIINNES01'A
n
L..J
..,
L..J
..,
L..J
City Project No. 95-12
..,
L..J
,..,
L..J
..,
L..J
DECEMBER 1996
COMM. NO. 10980-!H
...,
L..J
...,
L..J
...,
L.J
...,
u
TKDA
TOL Tl. KING, OUVALL. ANOER30N
AND ASSOClATF.S. INCORPOf'ATED
...,
U
ENGINEERS 0 ARCHITECTS' PLANNERS
1500 PIPER JA!=FRAY PlAZA
t.44 CEDAR & TRF.ET
SAINT PAUL. MINNtSOTA Sl)'01.2,...t
PHCNE::61~1292-440' FAY:612~J2-t)0IJ3
..,
L..J
...,
u
...,
u
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS-ARClllTECfS-PLANNERS
SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA
...,
LJ
DECEMBER 5, 1996
...,
u
..,
u
FEASIBILITY REPORT
WELL AND PUMPHOUSE NO.6
...,
~l
CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
...,
~
CITY PROJECT NO. 95-12
COMMISSION NO. 10890-01
'I
U
...,
u
...,
u
...,
u
..
LJ
I hereby certify that this Feasibility Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a
duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
...,
-....J
...,
L.J
K~:!~
Registration No, 13860
..
LJ
...,
L..J
..,
U
...,
LJ
...,
U
n
LJ
..,
L..J
..,
L..J
..,
L.J
..,
I
tJ
..,
L..J
..,
LJ
..,
L..J
n
LJ
n
LJ
n
L.J
..,
LJ
..,
L.J
..,
LJ
..,
LJ
..,
,
u
n
L..J
..,
LJ
..
LJ
FEASIBILTY REPORT
PROPOSED WELL NO.6
CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
Project History
The City of Andover has drilled five municipal wells to supply water to its residential and commercial
customers. The f'rrst three wells were drilled into the Mt. Simon sandstone at a depth of approximately 600
feet. These wells typically produce 700 gallons per minute (gpm) of supply with acceptable water quality,
Wells No.4 and 5 have been drilled into bedrock and f'mished in the Franconiaflronton-Galesville formations,
at a depth of approximately 300 feet. The lronton-Galesville formation is separated from the deeper Mt.
Simon formation by the Bau Claire formation or confining bed. Wells No.4 and 5 are each capable of
producing over 1,000 gpm of water.
Wells No. I, 2 and 3 have been difficult to develop to a sand-free condition and have resulted in higher
operating cost, when compared with Wells No.4 and 5. The reduced operating cost of Wells No, 4 and 5
result from their higher specific capacity's and shallower static water levels.
Project Description
This feasibility report has been prepared for consideration of construction of a new municipal water well, This
well will increase supply to the Andover municipal water system to keep pace with continuing growth. The
need for construction of Proposed Well No.6 has been anticipated and documented in the 1987 TKDA report:
"Comprehensive Water Plan Update". This report has estimated that Andover will need approximately seven
(7), 750 gpm wells to reach full development of the city planning area defIDed in this report,
The Project will be developed in two successive phases with each phase requiring a separate contact(or). The
frrst phase will consist of drilling and developing the actual water well. The second phase will follow
immediately after the f'rrst phase and consist of the construction of a well pumphouse and supporting
appurtenances. Included in these appurtenances will be a deep well pump and motor; chemical equipment for
I
10980-0 I
.,
LJ
.,
L..J
.,
L..J
,.,
u
..,
LJ
.,
u
...,
u
..,
u
..,
u
.,
u
..,
u
..,
LJ
.,
u
..,
LJ
.,
L..J
..,
LJ
..,
L..J
..,
LJ
,.,
u
wellhead application of fluoride, chlorine and polyphosphate; electrical switchgear and controls; heating,
plumbing and ventilation equipment and, fmally, site development.
Project Location and Suitability
The location of proposed Well No.6 will be in the northeast comer of the intersection of Andover Boulevard
and Xeon Street NW. A map showing its location is bound at the back of this report. Specifically, the well
location is in the extreme southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 23, Township 32 North, Range
24 West. This location is approximately 1.0 miles southeast of City Hall
The well site selection is important for two major reasons. First, the well must be located hydraulically, within
the distribution system, to allow efficient delivery of water to customers and elevated storage; avoid
interference with other wells in the system and balance pumping operations during tank. refIll periods. The
City completed a water distribution system model this summer, which confirmed the location with respect to
the noted hydraulic considerations.
Secondly, the well must be drilled in conformance with Minnesota Department of Health (MnDH) standards
(Well Code). The City must, as a part of these standards, own or control all property within 50 feet of the
well. The site must also be located such that known sources of contamination will not be withdrawn in the
well water. The site ownership has been confmned and it appears that all provisions of the well code will be
met.
Description of Construction Elements
The project consists of the drilling and construction of a municipal water well and the construction of a well
pumphouse, including water pumping and treatment facilities. The total project will withdraw ground water
and treat the water in conformance with MnDH requirements (disinfection and fluoridation) and current City
practice (polyphosphate), Additionally, the provision will be considered in the design of the pumphouse to
accommodate future treatment for removal of iron and manganese.
2
10980-01
..,
L..J
..,
L..J
The well drilling will be performed by a MnDH licensed well contractor, utilizing a cable tool well drilling
machine. The contractor will drill and install steel casing(s) and develop the well to permit the withdrawal of
sand-free water for potable supply to the City of Andover. It is anticipated, from development of Well's No.4
and 5, that the yield of Well No.6 will be approximately 1,000 gpm.
..,
LJ
..,
LJ
~
LJ
The well construction will not require the construction of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer,
watermain, storm sewer, street, etc..
~
LJ
..,
LJ
Geology
n
LJ
The geology present within the City of Andover is typical of the northern metropolitan area. It consist of an
glacial till mantle overlying sedimeiJ.tary rock formations. The stratigraphic classification of these formations
begins with the upper Cambrian series. To a very limited extent, Jordan sandstone can be found within the
City, however, the primary bedrock contact below the till is the St. Lawrence dolomite. Below the St
Lawrence formation, the Franconia and Ironton-Galesville formations provide the fIrst rock aquifer suitable
for capacities necessary for municipal supply. The Eau Claire formation is found below these units. The Eau
Claire formation is considered a confIning bed between the Franconia and Ironton-Galesville and the deeper
Mt. Simon/Hinkley sandstones.
n
L..J
,.,
L..J
,.,
L..J
n
LJ
n
LJ
There are numerous channels which have been eroded into the bedrock below Andover. These channels
become very significant in the location and drilling of deep wells. If a well is located over a deep channel, it is
possible that the upper water bearing formation could be missing. Also, conf"ming layers which have been
eroded will reduce the protection against migration of pollutants into lower water bearing strata.
..,
LJ
..,
u
The bedrock geology and topography have been mapped by the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) and
copies are bound at the back of the report. Additionally, six sections of land surrounding the well location
were searched for bedrock well logs under the MGS County Well Index data base.
..,
I
LJ
..,
L..J
Design Basis - Well Construction Phase
..,
u
,.,
3
10980-01
LJ
.,
LJ
..,
L..J
Based on the City's experience drilling Mt. Simon and Ironton-Galesville wells it has been recommended that
the City drill and develop proposed Well No.6 as an Ironton-Galesville well. Furthermore, the design basis
should be identical to Well No.4 and Well No.5.
..,
LJ
..,
w
During periods of glacial activity, the bedrock geology in southern Minnesota became eroded and channeled in
many areas. As a result of this activity, the bedrock beneath the City shows many channel which have been
cut into the rock. This situation could affect the design, cost and ultimately the conformity to required MnDH
well standards. For this reason, it is recommended that a 4-inch pilot well be drilled through the bedrock
formations to verify the completeness of these geological units. The information obtained from the pilot well
will provide actual geology to design the well, resulting in more accurate quantities and better bids from the
well contractors.
..,
u
..,
L..J
..,
U
..,
L..J
Assuming there are no significant anomalies in the bedrock, construction of proposed Well No.6 will consist
of drilling and driving a 30-inch outer steel casing through the glacial drift and into bedrock.. The bedrock is
expected to be the St. Lawrence formation. The St. Lawrence is comprised of dolimitic siltstone and
sandstone and is considered as a confming bed The casing must then be driven 10 feet into the formation or to
refusal.
..,
u
..,
L..J
~
L..J
Once the outer casing is seated into bedrock, it will allow a 29-inch open hole to be drilled through the St.
Lawrence, Franconia and lronton-Galesville formations. After completion of the open hole, a 24-inch inner
casing will be set into the 30-inch casing and open hole and grouted into place. The location of the bottom of
the inner casing will be determined from the drilling samples and observations or testing performed on-site.
..,
LJ
..,
U
.,
u
The final step in the construction process will consist of development of the water bearing formation(s) with
air surging, explosives, pumping or a combination of all these items, The development process is intended to
improve the efficiency of the well to yield water and to reduce, to an acceptable level, the amount of rme
sandstone present in the water.
..,
u
..,
u
..,
L..J
..,
L..J
..,
L..J
4
10980-01
..,
LJ
..,
LJ
Cost Estimate
..,
LJ
The estimated project cost is tabulated below for the implementation of Wen and Pumphouse No.6. An
cost should be considered estimates at this time and not guaranteed pricing. No costs have been included for
property acquisition.
..,
LJ
...,
L..J
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
WELL AND PUMPHOUSE NO.6
...,
L..J
...,
;.j
Wen No.6 Construction
Pumphouse No.6 Construction
Contingency (10%)
Total Estimated Construction Cost
$94,000
$265,000
$36,000
$395,000
..,
u
..,
,
LJ
Engineering
Administrative Costs (3%)
Bond Costs (0.5%)
Capitalized Interest (2.5%)
Testing
$62,000
$12,000
$2,000
$10,000
$1,500
..,
LJ
..,
LJ
..,
L..J
Total Project Cost
$482,500
..,
L..J
..,
LJ
..,
L..J
..,
LJ
..,
;.j
...,
LJ
...,
;.j
5
10980-01
n
L..J
n
L..J
n
LJ
n
LJ
..,
LJ
n
L..J
..,
LJ
n
L..J
,.,
LJ
..,
L..J
,.,
LJ
n
LJ
..,
u
n
LJ
,.,
L..J
n
L..J
..,
LJ
..,
LJ
...,
c.J
The detailed construction costs for proposed Well and Pumphouse No. 6 are tabulated below. For
comparative purposes, Wells No.4 and No.5 cost $69,153.00 and $56,394.\0, respectively. Well No.4 was
completed in 1993 and Well No, 5 was completed in 1995. Well Pumphouses No.4 and No.5 were
constructed after their respective wells were completed. The contract price for Pumphouse No. 4 was
$192,600 and No.5 was $177,500.
COST ESTIMATE
PROPOSED WELL NO.6
Description Quantity Unit Price Extension
Pilot Well 1.0 $6,250 $6,250
Mobilization 1.0 L.S. $6,000 $6,000
Drill and Drive 30-inch Casing 150 Ft. $150 $22,500
Drill 29-inch Open Hole 2\0 Ft. $70 $14,700
Install 24-inch Inner Casing 175 Ft, $50 $8,750
Install Neat Cement Grout 15 Cu. Yds. $200 $3,000
Explosives - Development 200 Lbs. $5 $1,000
Remove Rock - Development 250 Cu, Y ds. $40 $\0,000
Mobilization Air Compressor 1.0 L.S. $1,000 $1,000
Air Surging - Development 60 Hrs, $125 $7,500
Additional Mobilization Air Compressor 1.0 L.S, $500 $500
Mobilization Test Pump 1.0 L.S. $3,500 $3,500
Test Pumping 50 Hrs, $\00 $5,000
Additional Mobilization Test Pump 1.0 L.S. $1,500 $1,500
Chemical and Bacteriological Testing 1.0 L.S, $$550 $550
Video Record of Well Casing and Open Hole 1.0 L.S, $1,250 $1,250
Gamma Logging 1.0 L.S. $1,000 $1,000
Total Construction Cost - Proposed Well No.6 $94,000
6
10980-01
,..,
L..J
,..,
L..J
n
LJ
...,
LJ
...,
L..J
...,
LJ
...,
LJ
...,
L..J
...,
L..J
...,
LJ
...,
LJ
...,
L..J
...,
LJ
...,
L..J
...,
LJ
..,
LJ
...,
u
...,
LJ
...,
LJ
It should be noted that the cost of a 4-inch pilot well, estimated at $6,250, has been included in the estimate
above. Construction of the 4-inch pilot well should be performed prior to designing and bidding Well No.6.
COST ESTIMATE
PROPOSED WELL PUMPHOUSE NO.6
Description Quantity Unit Price Extension
Mobilization 1.0 L.S. $15,000 $15,000
Site Utilities 1.0 L.S. $9,500 $9,500
Building Construction 500 S.F. $210 $105,000
Plumbing, Heating and Ventilation 1.0 L.S. $7,500 $7,500
Chemical Feed Equipment 1.0 L.S. $9,500 $9,500
Process Piping and Valves 1.0 L.S. $21,000 $21,000
Well Pump and Motor 1.0 L.S, $17,500 $17,500
Electrical, Controls and Master Modifications 1.0 L.S. $65,000 $65,000
Site Improvements and Landscaping 1.0 L.S. $15,000 $15,000
Total Construction Cost - Proposed Well Pumphouse No.6 $265,000
Project Schedule
The construction of proposed Well No.6 is expected to require approximately four months during winter
conditions. Allowing a month for advertisement and award of a contract, the project can be completed in
early spring to allow construction of a well pumphouse and facilities during the summer months.
A pilot well can be drilled in several days time with the geological results available almost immediately.
The pilot well, if considered, should be completed and the results made available to the well contractors
bidding proposed Well No.6.
7
10980-01
...,
L..J
n
u
Findings and Recommendations
...,
L..J
The construction of Well No.6 is a feasible project in all respects. Therefore, it is recommended that the
City solicit quotations from several experienced well drillers and hire one to install a pilot well on the site.
Concurrent with this work, the City should order the preparation of Contract Documents for construction of
Well No.6, advertise for public bids and contract with a licensed well driller to begin construction of the
well as soon as possible.
...,
L..J
n
U
...,
u
...,
L..J
n
L..J
...,
u
...,
L..J
...,
J
...,
u
...,
,
u
...,
J
...,
L..J
n
L1
...,
I
L..J
...,
I
L..J
...,
8
10980-01
,
u
t!d"'" ," , II I" /. I
": / I' ',' ~ . I~ [Ii i; I I h:.lic+"",,,r " !Ct'
~~ I ' , ---1 I i I J I ~
I " ..~ I 0
-- ------' -r' c_ =:: '.-'- ---- . '1--+- ~~ f--, --- ",I, ~. fa
- ~ ! /I ~ ~R IA" i Z
1 ~ ' ",' )' I .'.:::: m f5'~ ~, Z
kA ' .~ ~,,: .. 7 I : '~f-:- .~ ~ ~ 'I ~
~ \ ~~i '''1. ~:\ ::"fil ~ ",' ,,1 ,~;I~i ~. ..'....'. iii'" __ _I ri
I \ ..~.~ i ~ cni , ~ ~O'\ \~~~\~J~:J'" ."R; "~". '" W
I /. .~"l--s.:-7'c., 0 ~ ~ ~.~ .' ,', . ~ ::;;.
I /' .....os:.: - D.:J I ",' ."... ,,": .:' ": ~ a. 0
I . . ~ . <: I ,ow - I JI>' .' '. ~-. . <C
' . a: 3: I " :~ '? . ," . C
~_____J._-/~____~_,- I_,-o_{___._ D. - .._.. _:.._ 'i," . h,.. :!: <0 Z
'. ' . '"1 . . . .". <C
. -. ~-1'-' '. z .
V I 1\ .. . " ... '.- ~'<..,"~\... "EI'I"" '-, .~.=-=, 0
I I \ . '. .. . . '. - " ' 0 Z U.
;{'I I ~ d ,,~~ g) ,!,~ . ~: '. '-~, 0
':"'ti'll.~~ . "1'" '.-
.~o I r ,..w *. . ";'~: ~: : ". jjf.l <c ...I
-I- - ^-' '.'t.I.'.I..\ \ -. . 1 . . ~ ~ .. ,~, ,:' .~ "'~ t 0 ...I >
. . "11.- . '"I"" . '. l
--- '9 ~'1"'1f-:- . . ."" ''', ~ ..f./;i~:!! .c',"'" ':ii'. . ;'~ 0 WI-
...~....~.....I!JI-t .:..:..", It'" _ 2 ~- .. -.t~Vt~r.. t..... ~: ,,\I . -
~~~.. >.!i.,"i.~ "'1" ~ ~~~,'I",\\~~~~,~': ~ I !~:I .~., : it,;:'" .: :. '''r:;r. : ;~";': ~ ;: ()
. . ~.' .,"~. ~,I .,,~(\~'fh;j,~l.c..,. ., ~ . ...-,~ R' I
' ;;c:..W'x..... '.,,~ -~ . ?'"\. '" il.. . '.X' "'-, a ' ' .';;ts"\c~ :. . - t:!ll;l' "
:\ .. ... "\.[" ""-If~ ,... .. ..~..., ~J..~.. .. 9t::3'..
-.l "\ -~.. ,-l:"Ji,. .\It" I. .. ~ - II. C '" ~Pl./"'I"I~ ;; . .. ...... ... - ~ > .~"\......: "".. : .. - ..
11:111.( C "'1l.CI .. .. .... N~"NOI' If,.. , -,,~
.. It ~'" "'Q~' ' .. .. "2;;1:1 ....... ~J1 II:. I
.. If\ I: 11 ~ :c ~ ...... ...... : .. -a: ......~ Ii' 'ItI I
I ~"'~ :+: "1"1>.. '~.: :'I~~'" . ..'. . .:'Ill!1.l\~' I
I .... .. :.. :: ..V,JT'l'lnh.: t... _.... ~ ~ " : ~ ~..~ , .
I ....... ...... !'NT J . if}" ~ III 0; n \ I
.. :. /J.Y ~ ...... . ~(;.. : - .'" PI Q$" ~,
. .. ","" ..... . I. ..,~~t.. " ..,.,.x. . b. _ _________ .
- ~'~~..~.~~' - ~ - ..~."~.:--~:: ~~~~~~'~liir:"''''''::';;'''~::~:'-;:':''''''':'::'':r;'' . .~........__::--.--.i'.~::: , L I :.1 ~w..~ M"~_ ~.L,J ; ~V~. -::-I~;
I I .. "..: ~ U:l!.! .. ....... ..~.-... I: i~: lI'~ l~ :~~
, Ii. '" ~. ~. ON, Ii: ,i l-~ ~~_ J.. tiil,
,I, i~1 :. .... ". '. .p.. ~ Ii; . ~~, .., ..~
I .. .." !il. ~ I! ~ ;...'lIJ . I . \
r .. .. t; So" ~ It I7F I" !'\II "J'" \
J ~ .. . _I~. ;..~'- ,/ -----_____1--_______ ~'_' ~'~:':: '~i
I ~ 0 'i>'>---' 'll'" i ""..
: !~ 1 Z - . 'fii: . f . (t' " I ' "< 1 ~ . "':"/_
I ~~! " I I :.: ~ I .. .
I It) ~f-- I.J '~(5~~!'" f I \'- I. I . '" .
, .J' ':S' '~I' ~ . f . I:; I : i= . r- <1;" . .
I d ~I-- ~ ~ ~ I ~ l ';;'
: z n I-- -'" \IJ: .' 1'/ ~, I I ' ' .,J;;;II . c'
I -I '-; If" I' i i:. I "m[:. ..... /)
.....".. "............. '--1- .L.... U"~u_~' ., . .1 ~ .n, -'. fl-, ''it)... .... ..... --r"--- - ...'fiJ,. .::
-t ~ ;.\ rlt&!- . . ---' .. ~ ,. "!
"""W ' \" '/" ~~~ 'Jfl..!; .. -II t , .. $ Jrl ~
I >><-. .~.= ~.- (dO
3: 'e' ..' ,..-., ","."",. --" . ..... ':'- .,..
l i . " . . .. . . . ']I , ~ - :~ ..-
, .. .... .. .. --:' . ." o/.'f'
~. ........ ".. .." .. "" .., , ;:; .. III .' ...
- I :-!l.'.:&.'~~' '; _'~ u;~. ~ : ~ -,ii~~' 'Nj.):.
, R II'L"'/' "^~" r.r.r.t.~f.. ~.. " I~ :\-~!O
- ,y" .,-: '!' I ....::..
-1------1----- ----- --_ '.. .~. .~\.... .. ........;; I _L...J' e; .,\ '),
I . "0 It ~~:;J;'7 ~ I"... ". l.f..I'" II I; IItlltt .." .. ....1 ~
.. It" .. .. .... ..:
- I . · .,~." ~''- .' . .: I-'; , ,..,,' i'~ 'oTrJi' ru= -.
'too .. It!: II " "-. .... .. .... .. .. ......: -" ....It) Q,:; .. " ~~.~ ~:.~
- I ~ : "'1I:-':'l!I.', -" :. : . ". . . !l:,... ~~ ;l I ~.,
.. .." .. .. .... ",,, .." .. .,,7.. C)
t I : . . .' : . .' . '. '. '-': I.' ~ 1~_I:.I2.,.~:) :'. '. ,. u
..., . . ..' . . i '\., ..:s ".v.. m
.... ...... :eO:i ....."'. !"N \ ."" II
'!,ii1I. X7.~ ,-,~ " .....~I. ~/'" liT- ''\1- f< --no - ~1!;5
"!!ll I <.(j ~I --"'---' ......., ~L.
I ~_ ,..~ j." " .-.
: J tJ ,~I ~ l!:. ,'," ':;"1 i:
I C I ~-'b "e' .... ~"'. <.)
I ',~ . # ..I:\. ~ ,-"1.\' ;:::
I . ~ ~ ..I.J.. .. ~ .. . ::
I " . }>,.+. ..lil il .
"'" . " '''', .' . . . .
I ': 'm"'h' : '. :. ~~\-::-i I,.' . . ~ ~ 1
' --- : :: . "1"::;: - ' . "'~ .....O'
I " ..... ~ -'. . :~;o, ,-
I ' : i- I-':' ~ '. ~. '~"""?5" ,'.' , .
I .... .. 'ow, Il\.~."
I .. . , ... .. .. :r:f.1'. ~. -- .
I ' . . '.f .' '.
I ' '.. i;...... 1-" ..._
/- i : : g.: ,-~i-. if 1':'::j",,,>",,"V~~ilI~
--.. '" .. '1"'11.'" =.~ ::>
~ . . , "'?
_______ ...hh.... rtf;j~'~' ~ I ,N <1>.
" .- 1.1 ~-11 I. ~/. ~ . ~""[ij [
" 0- . . ~ . ." """ ,. .1~-F.!.....
Q '~IJ.: " . ftlIj- I ;K" ..
. cs. ~..... h, 1" '::;: ~ JU . : . . .
- . .~..., 1-::- I~ .. I
'l/>' .......:::::1 . :-.,' :.~ -;- ~ .
Q ::....... !! l,) .. . A" .. .;: i : ".. ....
"'. '" ~. jL...';: : ".! . .
---. -",...- --- -~>...-~. .c::----...~ ~-j
'-=- ... . . ,./~, : I . . '~"'/<" 1m, ~""""':lJlrr1 03J1IJOY:;
~ ,".,- . ' ,y ~- ~ ~'
~ ~~ . ~ ~. e' ~' ~~ .~. ~ \ I '\ ~ " ~ 'I IT '/7';.\
.>e .:J.." ~ I i ~ ~ ~ ,~.> I<\;.\,(,' f' '-L1 <-\.\ C'I
MI. .' '\.' ~ i: "'1li"ti (~ I ~ ~ ~I.,! i 'II IY.Ai.: "0'
.,l"i, ~ :, ~ I f-ff'X ~I'l I ,.'f I :l. II'
.. "N;uui " . _. _______dlih..__..... Ii z
I I \ \lIlT ., .. ..." .
.:1 .. .. .. I \~., ~ r....., 1 Il"'\\ ..
ll, . I /' - -. J..,,'~~~ ~ i . u'.: ~ - I llu . ,..:J
I... "T 4. 1;t. 1 -.- Rj~ .... W
......: .. I J'" .. ... .. .. ..
I, . __ I ",... . '", <> l.rB -L.... . - .' .\"". . .. ..~.:>
:I~....r "'~,~<(& t':Io)'t Iil::t ......... 00 ..\'" Ifl-::::".: 10 ."-::(;: ......... -....,,":.__
" (\, " .... "-'~ l [i':io, ..... , ".".-. ;;:;' '.!
~ .. "~'t, .. tl! - ~"'--.::::. ~. <..~." ~ .. - . -:. 'Y;:1li ~ .; '"' . t! ....
k;r.--~- -~ ' ..:s-W".... ..-. .& . - ..,... .. ~ . 1;<. ...... .'
, >i ,,K~; ...."'. ......... ......., '.,
\:,. . \ . 11 ~ ' ~~!'-<~,. ......!:. .-. ':< ." . :~~ --- . -;;E;J '11" "
' ~ I.. x;,;, . "'I ". ";.' . _' . . .11El . ". '.
I' ~ v" \;oj 51 1"'11'11. . . . ....'::i1... .. .... 1t~" .... ..
. .. .. .. '\.~ ~ .~ .. t' , ... .. .. . .. .. . . .. """'- - .. .. ..
j.: .- ...... ~ '<< Jf<'-V ~~.: : : :...~...: ','M:! e.J ' ..~..!Ol." .' ''''
;' . . '" ~ ~'-".J' ,,". ." ~:lRl....... .~....' .\
,.... ~ ; ''''- ~.... . ,r .~, '.... . "'. . . .
. v ~ . ... .. - . . " , ....,... I... _" ..
'. . . n.. ~, 'W:~ . . .. :. : I !.:\" 73 ~t~~ ~ ~-:- ~.... I ....
- . ....... ~ ..(~ ~"-2 ;.......11_',,'.. ..-..-----.".'----.-,-........."""- .' . ." . r-' ;M.. .' ....
j/'[rj"" -"~ .11I;1 r.\. , . . ..... " II'ffi~
. ::~ ~ : ...... .~.~... :.n.;L ~~: .....~.. ~ ll'l..~
-::~~t? : . .........I......f.j: .' ~~. I~ \r.)-~0-/.'." II.JIIII~~ ...
.0);, '" It::;;: ." . .-." .~'( . ~ . ...... . .
-,<, ~ l'> _ . . " '<.:1" .. . .~,. ' .
, ';' s ~. . II ... .' .. . .. .. -.: . -' . . "J' I 0
~ ""!lj . I ..... "', .
--;. ..:q: . lfl'lli:OIll .. - .. ..... ...... '-Z
'. I . . ~
'," \i~7:'" . . . 1Do' <I>
. . " --- --- :. . J;\' - .. .J ~
'. .... i ; :. . '/.. .J 0
: . I '_ .: : : : . ~ '! W ~:l
"--- ,I l-.- --:!. ! == "'"
1:-..(\,1 }...;: I .,NM-lI/r. I:~~ .... .: (!; i ~<C
:'>-_ .. R .,) . {,1}lFrJ. I ~ S! N/HU .. ~ <C~
17\U', .~~. . Il,.."", 1 ,-: I.N =. . ... I o~
, -~'- .. :rq.. .... - .. I/! - . f.t'." . ... '" ",,0.;
R~. .' . ~ - . ' ''!:f i - 0
-' ,ii\- ---J' --I-' .' ~..... - .. .. i!
:: \1:- -". :. '^~ "" . ". '/;!<!J <I>
:1' ' .~. "!.:i!/...- . I
:: 1<. : '.. 1"
'I' - . . :.~ . " *1. " . ~ I WIi'
:: - ",-'ii) ,~ ~"i ,.. 'I'I.D>. "
.....,: 0.' '-\oJ . ,1+ ;. ~. ~r' ,~ .
':.' <C . .", 1,""'::' H' s----- . 'JiI: . >;'~I I
' '.'. .'~ .~~'''~ .. "
'I). \rl .. ~.I:::: /-.1;-.-'
: :: . -.Jf.;.. .k- '::: . ~ :!'I~/'1.'i'Y.,... I ._ _. '. __ :1,,,,..,,,,.#
_ ~. "!..- . .:"'"_ . ~..J";::~,''''~~!~ .. '~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
i~~~~~~~-I04""~~~ 0 i!~~"'90~7 "'Ai~~t>~&~-e: ',_ ~~'~-.~~ ~I_ ~~_- L----..
-.~~V ~"Iq.:~ ~~~ _'~ 0 :i~ ~"~~ D --:3 . \ ()/>c;~~~ .:14:-~~ ~~.. 8'4
~~~~~'m '2;'~t:.~ ,~~J f1'o"~~v' c:.'e', ,~~~~~
lG\-~-anhm~.~y a\~,oo.~~~D ~~,\:) t~'-*S: ~'~l~~~~.,.\r
~ ~'i--l~~-:~-~~";"-""--' ..~"~I.~ (-
,(~ or:- 0 f\ "') "'--':,::_)~ ~(J{--~~~'o r~,;, :.~-~- \;iZ IS.:7.- ":.',-!,"I."')'~~\
l,J, ~~'-1'J\ -;..!V:V \\J 1" . l' (~I'- ,,~, - ~ ~\-A ~- ~ ,~. . /-' 1-\ ~
1 t;( J '2~',n ,.0' l)-:l;,\, , .'::-': ~\ ~ j8.., . . 1& .....~_\~l ..WL.......\. ~~ ., II ~ ~"{ \
..., , ~...A..~CJ(J i !:~:.r:'- ..~~-~: "~I ~~. ~, ~::-t-~-)).). I '7~~~v
, n. ., ~., '1'=2l.3'C"'\ ( 'II :~.I~ . "'QO~ii~ /' : \?\ h~dAl~. . ~ ~~ ~
~ ()" ~\j", - 00".) 0 \; ..J1'29~: ~:;p(! '. ~ ~;:ib__- .c...oo.2,;:R -s..i'~.,(, . .c--i,vr ~Pfi\)
IfDO, -<,-:::>' 1',0 III' ..... '1: \J ~: ~~""'-s;;- . . ^" ~ID /"~'1. ,~_ J>-;:. I,:"~ ..~-
__.....'-' &-(flIO.' '-. l..J 15511 ~.o.... ffi ~ I C)~'~ ~/'I bJ ../ I;;; I-ul\,~~ _
~ L -------- ,,\, '. 1tn6'I' - -~.., .: ~'0 ...... 115 ~(f!; 130 I II-
I ::::---'Z'("K II "A'>I'...... 0 A~~"-t '(;--.., . \..<:: 111 'I'
~~~ ~7 ,87""""" . )"2:,,,-- ..A~D'II:' .2~ 1.1. 8., . ",\ I ~~ . .... K ....
'. .. ~ ~. ~ '~r~~~ ~ p 'A~lndO"'I>~~r f'.~2.:.,~i";; ~~~i .~t5::
1 ~~ ~ t'<f - - ~ ", \: \:i '\J: :,:JfJ'-.o A 0 ',- ,~}J . 204' ~ /pi \~!;:~}2 '1
~ &, ~~ ~ 11 ,liZ,---,'~ ,~~~~~ 0 ~Q ~'-.~~~~~~e~~~~~~" g-__
\L~I_~a ~ PROPq~ED WELL NO.:-6 ~o~ I~ if'-" \J:L~. \;7 0 ~~-
}}"M': )50'-. r::::!i--. ~~/'l r-,':/ ).::::-.. -://.~ P~l :-
?-' Ffi~'0:.. -.:: -if ~ ~ ~c '-/1, /~I\ oit"C\ c; .r--.-rr:Q. /' ...._
I (~"<) ~ . ')/ ~ S ~ c--'/ iB~Fo 3> . 0//8', .:::-.. ~ v~ ~p
f(~ " 7' ~,' '" "" "' = ~ <:: y ~ ~ 0\ 0 ~~. \ \...J - o~ ,~_,/)Z::1/00 ~ ..;{ .-
, ,f:S; <i:J' h J[ ~~'"" ' F":"?~, - 1,(' ~ l' 0 ~ --<>-2-~':
- _ _ - >X?' (/ 00 900_~~ ~iJ~ '- . ~ \ <:) ~ --_' \-Po ~1f :: ~"':~ ,~
~ _ ~" "c;'V _ ..... _ " . ,_ .r -Cl -",'\.C' ~(.gc:V ," ~~ '>~ - _,~ .,~>~ ~\~~il L
--- ')<:,A"dlt ---.- -J) 1_/) _'Jx=.li 'lTl, 0 '\J~~/_---:: - ~.,..~--/, '1+ '~0~ l
li~"8':jj0~'(J?"~!4.-ts'~ ~~ '~~ob!. I '---'35 N' . ~'~~>~.(~~~D_-:_-:_~~\~71'G1~' r~~:>i' _:~:'" \
'II~ ~ -~ II .\.~ / - - e), I 895 -. P \. I -~-:?- --= _..J \...r......<I -=-- ~
> ~. ,~. c' - - -()I 'D~ \S'~~Gl '~-i:~-I )~'; <::0($l ....-~
:l\'~ -_:. I\(i)"; 0 ': ~= ::::__-~. .0.0 CI,OJ2 ~ .,~ '~-=--~" C~ /:..--:. ')' ~ ~~~
l~ -~ '-J U~ . - ~ I GII 0 ~~~i V G(l9~ -?;:=:''];., ~~(:::v ~-.~
J (Q.. f\ f?<::I ~. II 0 I b,' t::;'-' ./ ~ ",-01,
~l .>' ;R~ "" ~~.-~.: ~,~ Buw<\tC H' n 0 0 0.,: .~~,/)~b"'1:"",~-i~:"~O _...~-~~t---:
, 7": ,11"';::1/ \ ~ - 01- \' ~!1~, , ~ ",,~<J ~AY",.t.:ti~ - .,...--
~ :~~~ ~;;,'r~ l~:lA '-.'0 - .erl\as .:'~ Qg; "~~~ ~~:-<7:~ ~?1f?~;:-~--- ~~-ttlf-
~ "" ". "h--:.:~~/), 1 G '0' D'''r~ ~0 -~ v~~?\~~~~~ o:...~l[5
i" ,{" I.,'~'-N: ~)5~ 7r--0..':~~. \l1~~~ ~ 0 \L70; 0'" ~~~,v~~,..-:--~?-:+~~
~' !~-"".:" ~,-", (t;"t"'_'---~J'o 1,,~V1 O'<\lr ~ ~~ ;;:.--:::-~ -.--.l~-!""....
~/. -, . ~,;" r.:~ )1 ~ 0 .~~. ((;>) ~B ~N~lE.R R}" f I ~ '-' ~. e9~; ::-;;:;~~. :
. ~ ,<.' -::? t' 5" r".i..C ..,-
~ ~~ " - ~ ~ :~~\ ~~o < ~- \ Golf E z:..~'\! ~~ 7r ___==/ " ~I ::<
L>I :1""', > " ,.' > ;;._ \'-'\ ~~ ~I~ ~ \)~ 00 '\ ~:S~~;"--~ ~ ~;- ~
~~'~r." '~..:, .~.~~ ~'~,.J ~~l:,o''iI ~ .~: ~~'" _".:'":.6;, . ---:1--'"
,:':'~<:.H .. ,d>,.,;-,;,= ,:.' · "_.;;.. "~ .;;*'~ ~./J, _... ~' .0 . ~ '( "" "" \~. . ::;;j ;'-~J:;"':;' , .,1. <::::
1:_: .',1 : :'~~ ~ ~ ~ _. oft: 900L.l., .. ---- "='....."'!- CI
d i: ,; p ..;;, "- - ~-, I.~ - ':':. :~ ~ul~~ D .....=~~ ::--I\\;....~.... '---' " ===j'
, : r /c- - ;.=--"'"'..... +.-, '1- ~~ JJ(' /': '"'!:: -- - -~~=-ra-!t
~".,<. ~_--",.:--::: f, ""~; (/ ~ ,_ ~~ J .... ~-;'-"~~~~I.'t4kea
- '5 _ 2 r--,('-! -<( :;... If f.,~ :o.__~ ....:--~~...::~' ," .-, ", 9 ='
" DG/ ~~, ~-~L '~/" ~
= <(\j~z ~~ }:,.... :<:'\tt~';~i~~~~ ~~~~);'tt:;,"'" ~-~~~~:7~;G"'i,j~, ~ '~~'
'o/~~ ~\~, ;: "'''01. 'l~~~",'r"" ;;,:,";'~.'~, to\ ~.,-.",::_~--,-.'.,.~ ~}.S"~,:-~_,,, ,~-.f~,;, '"" !f:~ ~~5L(j F~ -~. I
:j 1~-4",: ;:0.&1 i"'(' "\7 t:J,"'n' ....::;,-~.. ',,' "~ ...,'~V(.~,,,.. ~- -=,...1
..., /' ~:-: ,_~==="~, i~':~'1A LJ ~I 01 ,'=--...~\, ~ EXISTING BEDROCK WELL
~t1/ ~~?-.:- JS;nd~'~~'::, I '~:1r:;,h4~ \ ,'''' n ~~h C LOCATIONS IN SECTIONS 22-27
...,
L..J
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
MISCEllANEOUS MAP SERIES
M-SS. PLATE 1 OF 2
BEDROCK GEOLOGY
...,
L..J
rt
,
R 24 W
R 23 W
I I .' . , - -. R 22 W
'l "fJ !ll "'Minard} (Ice" \0 \-'} ,.".~... ~( ',\ ,i^""..a..A.-K'A'7"
ri..l ~) ~b/ " Bi~'H't€J.\ P ~'92;:ID\~1. -aJ(~) lD..~.~(_l:>. 90.?,u....
~ ~ (f~, ~'\ O1:.S :c '~ .'.1~JOl r-'~~.,. f.-. I V~ i . 'Y'" '\J :--~k.~
L~ lS'-i. J~ l\ i '- "\ ~ ,,~CO~l ~'r ~qreyt-.g.2:; / ~'. '1Sl--- t.'~", P:.b';:'
n' ~ ~OC._R 2r."A\ 1\\1 c. /ii;> \~ c. h'" ,'r-S\23 \'<,1 6;.r! 1-1arli~ ~~1I1_'2.~
'~,~' s' re~\, ~~~ 66 C>/!~ ~l ;51: ~F C.{'1~~\ ,6{---66}2'i!!i' ~f ' :A; r;..~.t~ '/5'~
r;r~ ''i.N- L~" ~ \. ,~Ii L '93/1 '-:-=-1 <:i...L" " 'If :,..' ~
~.,~ ~ V;-;:::<l. / ~~ I c;)~ r1 c-, ,~ .} ~l' ,l[/!\ <,.-'= ~~vc. ---~ ~f6' <(
/', ~j~ \t2GJCeJ.~or '- lv~~"J,~,a .o.e~J-' .' ''!!lJ-~~'''., '~'~19'r ~ -Jr.,::;~U T>.~~"~,
~ :'lIt ,~9S 't':/,..... 6 .2.t ':" ~ . ~,!n':o Lmwood~ ' fc
J '\1\~~'t 1:::,-,,). {; (~ ^ 'I 'll \~ Y #. ~ ~o;f,fa qe .? 'V?( ~ 9/0 ,,o'-
) C n~l ~ '\ ~ ~ ak~ ~~ 'J ,,'t,-\; :~m ,L'-'... /?:- \.' "
~~ ~ 6?s -l ,C ~/ ):1: {J /, ~~\ ~~ ~ ~~o.l";':;'Ys
tJ),...,:.} ,.' ~ \ ~1Ui1" 'i-.~~.c. f / ( /+""=1' c. 6 C, Sf(\ ,.... ,'1,"./" ":0,' '~
, "'~'""'~\ '. ~1i1C. / \-r' ) ~ Cem,' V ~ 920::;./"j:: \-.L"-
1~'- .~~ 'S ~ ~ * 1('. r.J'.-1",>\ "'~~~I),):-p.:--:'~t. -:0~{
Lf~,~ ~ '~::. ,~"'<, ~Cltl ,lo/4G~n6L~.L' ~_* yr", _:,',~ ~~,,~~.;/ --'/'J~4"\ "".-.,.:',,'.o~:~~ '=':i'
'/ . 1:---: . "'" V r . ~ '.. ~::-:::Y?'-./~-"; .....- 1-' \ .. \\
r-' fL '1 0'" ........~;v """ .-~f) I V' ___ t. ,-. -.-,.. !?. """"~ --' "~",' ,.1. - .
:, '. cet~}r'- ., IS' , . ''Lr'' S...:<~-'~,;'fr," 0.:,.: ~ ';tt! '" .' ~
u! 8~ ^ /7("np; . .{/~ 6 920 '. ~,-; '~~i'S'<lfl 0 '3-;.,-~_-;r, ~l.c '6 ,,-~ ~
. .... ~. l'.6 il( ~ 'I. . ~,,"I,' " r'A-:- .....'Y J J~lJ~J ,.,6 T ::F'" ~ 7 ~
~w 1A 6 r ;-. . ~6':J ~T~~~LJ! 907 i,,=-~'~~-'-6 /~./. 66--;:&'
rt -!J I-~ 6 ; ( / ,-. ^ r'9.' -;1 ~ }-.... 'v.. ~ '-.., ~-/ , 6 - /"'
C 6 ~~~~. ~e e 't \ IJt~.~ \ I ' ,~ " ~6 ,.',
6~; c. 69.!8 . 0 ~7r, ~K~~.l c,.j,...,'.c,;;,( ~~t\etf~~"..:,.,..,.~92~ (!
rt:\\~~06. .' "', ).~ I ~~~t ~~~?/;j, ~~'~.J};l<:'o~}~'/ _"',.,.,'~ "c,.~.J>./1
r' < :1 ~~V I ,,) ..~(/ ~I~L' i' .' $l ;;r..\<
~'hJ! ~ j~lJ5~ ':rw'~~ ~;tl /j:.~; Il1 )/,,~l~waru A~
L;~~~C.~ '\ ~ O)'{~~ ~ 6 ~I c.'1\ ~ i7~ al~~~' ':....lj- c\. tJj Ii-P.~ '-- l--- r"~'
~ in.~. ~ ~?--' ~~ .~ I )~11 ',', "..L,.fU" :'\.
,~ , lfiOUn;X' 'fll!(! _ . '\. ' c ?':J. ~ ~, ~, ", ",',.., ',",.. , ~i~\
~L,f ", c,c. Il. .t:: i · ~~ liB ~ " .,~ 'V~ ~ '7/ - .:'... ("I",~", r t ",'
", ",{ '..L(/A~ "-X ~"'" \' ~ ~.' .1,. ~ ~ rv) "~C--~~ ~"" - "-8, 9,0,.." Cl IY(
r ' .,'1~.' ~(/ /' ,...~l i~.'\ '"I --u \'\ ~( ., ,.1., .1. .,1..
l, ''N ~ .,\,\,t'jl) I "~'c::'--.... n20' ~.- ,.1, =-..
L i-A- ~i~., '" ~ (' """i'.\ \ "~PROPOSED WELL NO.6 C (,. /0 ';.-.n "',..,., ::', ,..,",',~'c,,' "'. -1-1 ,:
{Jf>P'~, ~ {1"I1lC J" P-~.t~~~ .If,.JIl..IU''/ c. - ,7=-,6 ,.,......---r . \_~ ..,':;."".. ' ~'c:::r ~, ....,W
,'1 JIIII~ ""- ~""-JJ~rl"-t<.'lLa"-q\-'.v II .... r-J...., ....... 7"'1 ,,' ",y,,/\(!-';'" V{
~' II I II-~,L,-,; . L." ,~,.~,~,'~ -:::I ~'-f'J' -=/ .,,; \ (c. t.J I D/~ -Z /1~) ~'~J?I
~ "-V e>Gyo l- : ("~~ (65 6~ .~.. I ~ _V <3 -" / 1<( 717'
" .----; ~:~~(4:,..-; ~~ 10 ( . .~ mnnsville I ;~! r IV ~ tn'Ojr.a. 'xSEV~~!9/
, 1,1:-0. ~~ C~ ~I "c....~ 1 c,., " .~ :/~j-'~' ')...JC-;( ,~?~
L~~" Anl~ . '-. l"...,~ '';r ~~e~il./ CC==S'".- .. .... +(;.sl ) } r-{~ f-i: c. '""";/; [p."", ~,'
~ ~;~ 0- ~ ",.,.(. 't9" ~ <:" l.- ' ,I.. r L., .r::=i;} , I ~~ 11..., /','
." 11 \j G . t r ( I J-ut""l ,.'~RR~ ,J '
1,)19~ 'a~toV<<IT :~~f-~~q' ~l ?",'J.:' '908.,..A e?fg,qIfV-;=~ ~~l", ~.88~:~~
,~' c,.'6\"*.IR'''O. of '''Ii )~ ,'" . 1'-..., ~I xi, '), v;: I~t
,c'\o l), c,\ \d' CilO ~ I }. __t.k<llt, ~A "i 'II'~~'
:~~~~~@~~r:~t~r~~~f6 \ /6 l~iti~A.~b~~~r~
..~~~ ,,,,,-~k\c,~t 61/1^ 6n~\-;"""'--; L~ff~~' / I~~~)l
r-,
LJ
UNIVERSIlY OF MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
MISCEllANEOUS MAP SERIES
M-SS, PLATE 2 OF 2
BEDROCK TOPOGRAPHY
..,
L..J
'; R 24 W I R 23 W
, 'rI' L jJI." '", R 22 W
t1 ~~' '/1,,:':"_ ("'Mt'nar~)Jfke~\)"'l V~" ~~"~~,,,~.g: ~'~ I'::~, "-,. . ~ :;;'~""\I '~,'
M ))' ~~ ,<:' '.Be'tL .Y- ~.r< ...... .I..,,'~ (),,~, ~ &f1.-.
" .'\\ ~'l' , 93'tJ"" l{t;7("l ".' J ~? ' "~~' I, ~"" II) / , ~;\.
LJi\~ -'" .0.0 ,~ :> '-! y- ",r--; i/h / C \
~~~ 'u ~~ ,/4'~ ho rJ""\ ~ ~ ~ t:~.2! ~'r C(JT~~~.gt<) \\ . ~c.'-_!Eoo,:1 ~L D";~
}-S. . R ~1/K\\%,- /~(" t~ ~,." fb\Z3 v( i \A; ~r~~~~~~;~._..
):,) .'~)(~~~ ~R !~"lf1;(r::~.~:V-D~~~= :~
1, J~~ '/', f>,V ,f'---') ) // i-...r0~ J ~.}tY f\\",' ~ 750 1_ ..l/,:' ......, , /:,0, ~,~~,) \, ~ ~" I/I'
~~-j/Ym 'y )r O-o-::-Y ,(/ / ~'<J... 1,-/..= ": -+ ?'.o~~ '=-<::-. " ~'/ )~
~ Ill..!' /A r::S::-:cJ(eJ~oh > Sj'J'I' ~,-, ~----. ,..,p,.' "1,([n~.,.,
, ~ ~ ~~ \U~ j. ')MI ~~ ':1J:Atc:t'L 1. D'-..-:t<;O>,:,:" ~\\
.1 l:. ~ . . tl...vG1( -1 ?I\l~ ~ I r t' ~ ~" ~~",..... ;/1,.""", ,:,,~ .\~
) ,~Y\2 f1?s J: ,...... ~\1~" "" t::Y'IV... '.'.j -/,-J
.!o'jYj.II...........:>rI~ '~~-; ,I. ___""~..::;i IG /v/ {JT....... ~ '-':-~, /J "l:~.L/' I,S
y ~ .... f\ I _~, ~~ / kJ......1 ~::~q''>A,FA I .. ./.", Y\j----}
t?\l:;:. ~""\.-.\' Il L....' ;'{ (/'/" /"i .1 I ' L \~c m .,. 1/(.",,/ ;Z , ~
. ~-'>; 'W ) ') , \. ~~ N '~I DrA- ~~I ('. r./1.....~ .. \ ," \. ,;;:;:;;: '- '/~" .,., -r ",.~(Jj'-, ..
LP II ~4j, ,:t. ~~ e~ 7;01'::;- ~ '~'~. Q )V Y ~I~ >..~"/ (.>S:'~ ~ """:, '~ J~: ,:,"
'.',J f-tr) tl ~,~~~~" -~ ~~-i~ ~~. ';,,~~.,)-":.,',!.2::~~-:c-;,T,""""', --",<FTs.~U , " "'"',, =:~\.\\,,~ "',' , (
~'v r-l CCL~~~'\\'~ '/ " ~ _ ~C;l'-.i.~,,:,;'.",...t--..I ~"'-.; ,'. ,-;. o~~
LJ"~ P-ijif z"- 92~) ,X: ".-'-..y~rl920F" '~".\.~~(f'~
'\ ~. _ ,,/ t.-;;:;;"t;' "r{:E;1/7r'-:" ~7 \Y\"'""~'V/O~ I,
':Y!. \ '\j .~~ ~ ro ~ly'.~~IJ~,~/T.,,':/~,.~,':'lOO'lJ/~
l,.~~ iJ (J If!!!/j~~ ~ l' rf, ,'e ~~iJ5.l....,Jf~,a~~ " '/~~:~~~
) 0 93 '" f-J. ~ar ~'Ii ~f~ ~ ~--"-'--J/Y" ,...- .(' ,...,..1920 ,--I
fr'\H ~ I"~ ' \.-;: ~ . ../.'1'". '," /
~.,../.., ,01"','" ~ --}. " f- /i ._lJ .~'-( ~/)y'~1? ~ ~/ _,,!,.,",,:,.;.,' ';: "',::,.~.'I ..J,-1-
~ ,~ ~ ~ 0<\ A V I(~~ JEI ) '---l~iV J.- ~~7Z;Y; V.,., ," ,d , " 1-1-
~ ~~J::-:A I y\ c.:rt ~ \ ,.KJ....~r~/~'\~ ~:I/ ~')-"" ",':~',',' 'Jb;':ra d ~
L.!:-" 1S,~ \ '" ~ .J/J/; J~ ~ I ~ I U , ,., 0a 1 ~.. ~.' 1 '7 .,..- "'~ - ~ ' '
/ c ~...!~ /\ / , ---.- - -..".' ~ I-=:.:::: -
, . r " .' frke .. ~ i' 'A7(v ' I ..... > ,I., ":,..L,", (
J5 \)J tit ~ '/ .-L. '89 ~~n / ,JJ.-"-:/~ ~:~, ':~':,j.::"A 'I'
~ 'F-- - ..................... ~ ' ~ 0', ~ ,.:::]-..." ,', ,', '-"", .....' ,". "'
~~ ..J.~~'0~~ ~-:UI;-- .~\~ E2a/1: rjJ ;,i;,~ / ,,":~;,:..,~,;=;,~:..=2~~i,f.,-::"'.'8q , c ,~~,':
L1... );t....r ~ ? ~ '(' ......-\j....\>-.. \' \ ~<" .J ( .\Ji7h /.:r -'lB(Y(O ~:O'~'~':~"'-,;~!!, - ~ '1
'tN. ~"Cl:;:;::?' '1.1: '.r' ,~\'{ 1..'\ ~ i r., 19/7' ' ' eO :0.,..............., '?'~--;/"\ >,:j \r/
r"- ~ T!; '/ .'" .' ~1 l' - ---- ....;r./ Y) 'Ii,
',m(;6 ~- I-~~ u"'-6j.o ~ ''--''''",:... /::J/~' -;rrq ~ ./~ I )q".. VA -<: ,; r.
I ~ oJ \;'\ Q . '_ ~ .o~ ~ "-..../(1.5 '- ," .,1., I ',- r-- , d (;1:. , /'~./ /<7:-:-;'
-;'II"". ,I_--"-.j~'. Y =-~ >...C'.::s v.=,.... \; K1sville / (~ /i~ "'-.1110 t"~~.Jd{
r'- J "~' 'V,.'-' (f:~AAlLA " - ~ ,"::'~'
!d ~ An ~,~q;- '" ~ 'X:o ~<J.."~'" 7Jo_ '- J ~/tf( /'O-iI' ff;/'-J~W'(
l~ ~ tlll ~6 I / K&'. ~ A ~ <." ,6'~ .".t-.,.- J1'~~~~.fo~':Gl, ':" \
~ .........'-.< ~ .~ ./ /V:. ~\ _C'::2 " ~ .....) 'JljJ~
u'~' ~~~o\n~(~",~! ~"~~w..
',1.:~,~ '-rt ~ ~dr ~~h.~S\xr ~,..I' ~\ ~ ~~' ..-?'::;'Ol~~~l: .~~",~~~t.
LJ
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: December 17. 1996
AGENDA SECTION
ADD-ON TO ITEM #27
ITEM NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
City Clerk
Approve 1997 License Renewals
The City Council is requested to add the following 1997 license renewals to Items 27:
Cie-arette Licenses
Tom Thumb Store
Off-Sale Non-Intoxicatine- Liauor Licenses
Tom Thumb Store
. DEe 17'% 03: 18PM PETERSEN TEWS & SQur
.~.
P.2/6
~w OfFICES
PETERSEN, TEWS a SQUIRES
Jao__orEtSSIOt..lAL A.SSOCIATION
4800 I OS CENTER
80 SOUTH EICHTH STREET
MINNE^PO~I$. MINNE50T^ 0::1402-2206
TELEPHONE (612) 344-1600
f^CSIMILE 1612) 344-'B50
JOHN P^UL M^R.T1N
December 17. 1996
David L. Carlberg
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
Andover, rv1N 55304
COPY VIA FACSIMILE
755-8923
ORIGINAL VIA U. S. MAIL
Re: Bill's Superette
Our File No. 1576-35
Dear Mr. Carlberg:
Enclosed is a letter which responds to Correspondence dated December 2, 1996, authored by
Timothy 1. Keane. Please distribute the attached to the Mayor and the members of the City
Council of Andover.
Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.
Yours very trut)',
JPMw,I/IS76-3;~02
Enclosure
cc: Rademacher Companies, Ioc,
. DEe 17 '96 03:19PM PETERSEN TEWS & SQUI
,. '
P.3/6
LAW OFFICES
PETERSEN, YEWS B SQUIRES
P~O'IESSIONA.L ASSOCIA.YIO..,
4800 IDS CENTER
60 ~OUTH EICHTH STREtT
I.IINNf^PO~'S, MINNE30T^ 0:l402-?Z08
TELEPHONE i612) 344-1600
fACSIM'~E (612) 344-10:10
JOHN P^UL MAII.TIN
December 17. 1996
Mayor Jack McKelvey and
City Council of the City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W,
Andover, MN 55304-2612
Re: Correspondence of Attorneys for Hills of Bunker
Lake Homeowners' Association I Rademacher Companies, Inc.
Our File No. 1576.53
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council of Andover;
We are counsel for Rademacher Companies, Inc. which holds a Special Use Pennit ("SUP")
with respect to development of property located at 138th Street N.W. and Hanson Boulevard
in the City of Andover (the "Property"). It has COme to our attention the City has received a
letter (dated December 2, 1996) from attorneys representing certain homeowners in the
vicinity of the Property in which the attorney advoclItes reconsideration (and presumably
revocation) of the SUP held by our client.
Please consider the fallowing in response to the letter from Attorney Timothy], Keane which
we believe is somewhat incomplete in its factual presentation and without legal support
whatsoever.
FACTS:
The Property is part of ll. plat known as Hills of Bunker Lake Third Addition. The Property
was platted in 1988, in a manner that clearly indicates an intention to develop our client's
Property for commercial purposes, Although it is suggested that the character of the
neighborhood had changed in the last ten years, the plat has essentially remained the same
since its original filing. As such, the land which comprises the Hills of Bunker Lake Third
Addition has been developed much as originally contemplated, heavily residential with
complimentary commercial spaces adjacent to Hanson Boulevard.
. DEe 17'96 03:19PM PETERSEN TEWS & SQUI
P.4/6
, .
PETERSEN,TEWS.q SQUIRES
"'~OF"f;SSION"'L ,.I4S0CIATfON
Mayor Jack McKelvey and
City Council of the City of Andover
December 17, 1996
Page 2
In August of 1988, a Special Use Permit was considered by the Planning Commission for the
City of Andover at a public hearing. There was no opposition to the proposed Spc;cial Use
Permit for the installation of gas tanks, fuel and propane tanks. The Planning Commission
gave its conSent to the use on a unanimous basis and sent the matter on to the then-City
Council.
In September of 1988, the City Council for the City of Andover considered the Special Use
Permit application and concurred with the recommendation of Planning Commission, voting
on ~ 4-0-1 basis to approve the Special Use Pennit.
In October of 1989, the Rademacher Companies requested that the Special Use Permit be
extended. By document dated October 24, 1989, the City responded to the request of the
Rademacher Companies that the approval by the City Council of September of 1988 did not
establish a time limit for development. That response also noted that the City had the
authority to impose a time limit, if it had chosen to do SQ. As there was no time limit
established, there was no need for an extension to be granted by the City Council.
Until 1990, the City of Andover had no "automatic" expiration on the special use permits
granted to property owners to implement development projects in the City of Andover. In
March of 1990, the Planning Commission considered, for the fIrst time, limits on special use
permits tmder ilie auspices of a so-called "sunset clause". The concept was that, if after 12
months of the grant or approval of a special use permit, no significant progress had been
made on the development, the City would declare the permit null and void. Once again, the
Planning COmmission held a public hearing on whether to implement a sunset clause as part
of the standing ordinances of the City of Andover. At the public hearing of March 27, 1990,
the citizens were advised that the sunset clause ordinance, if approved, would not affect
special use permits already in place. There was no retroactive language in the proposed
ordinance and, as such, presently-existing special use pennits would remain unaffected.
In April of 1990, the City COWlcil p~sed a sunset clause-type ordinance without adding any
language to that which was C<lnsidered by the Planning Conunission on the subject of
retroactivity. Ordinance ~o. 8. LLL was passed in 1990, amending ordinances relating to
special use permits and variances.
In May of 1995, our client requested confirmation that the SUP of 1988 was still in force and
not voided by the so.called sunset claUSe amendment added in 1990. In June of 1995. the
City Council instructed staff to prepare a letter confmning that the SPU of 1988 is still valid
and not subject to the sunset clause.
. DEe 17 '96 03:19PM PETERSEN TEWS & SQur
P.5/6
PETERSEN,TEWS.g SQUIR.ES
PFlOfl"CS.srO"'~L AS.$OcrATION
Mayor Jack McKelvey and
City Council of the City of Andover
December 17, 1996
Page 3
Contrary to what is asserted by counsel for the homeowners, Rademacher Companies has
undertaken substantial plans for development of the Property. Drain~e plans have been
submitted, as well as landscape plans and grading plans for review by City staff. Further,
environmental studies have been completed with respect to the site. Our client has worked
closely with City staff to ensure that the Property is developed in a manner that is consistent
with City ordinances and regulatory codes. Architectural expenditures. as well as survey
expenditures have been made and our client has attended numerous meetings and held
conferences to move the project to completion. Among the efforts that have been made by
Rademacher Comp<mie5 have been telephone and in-person conferences with certain of the
neighbors in the area. Rademacher Companies is ready to move forward and has expended
considerable time, effort and money in doing so.
DISCUSSION:
1. It is suggested that the sunset clause is clear on its face and that Rademacher
Companies should be "precluded" from asserting any rights in a SUP. _ A
more complete review of the legislative history of the so-called sunset clause
helps explain why the legal position of Mr. Keane is not well founded.- The
issue of whether the sunset clause would be applied retroactively was the
subject of at least one public hearing and there is a direct reference to the fact
that the sunset clause would not be applied retroactively. Further, there is no
retroactivity language in the clause i~lf and, consequently, the sunset clause
ordinance is inapplicable to our client's SUP,
2. It is suggested by Mr. Keane that where a properly owner has made no
investments in reliance upon a pennit or approval. no rights should vest in the
permit. - Conversely, where investments ~ been made in reliance of a permit
or approval, perhaps Mr. Keane would argue that rights do vest in the permit.
Because Rademacher Companies has made expenditures in reliance of not only
the original approval, but subsequent revisiting of that issue in 1989 and again
in 1995, the right; in ,the SUP <lIe very well vested in our client.
3. It is suggested that changes in land use necessitate 11 revisiting of the SUP. It
should be pointed out that the plat has been in effect for many years and that
land use changes in the immediate neighborhood have not occurred. Rather,
there has been implementation of contemplated land use that has been planned
for nearly a decade. The traffic volumes that have increased since 1988. are
assuredly a result of the implementation of the very land uses that were
r;ontemplated when the SUP Was originally considered. (Further, there is no
indication that traffic volumes cannot be adequately handled along Hanson
Boulevard where other commercial development is located,)
. DEe 17 '96 03:20PM PETERSEN TEWS & SQUI
P.6/6
PETER.SEN,TEWS 8 SQlJIR.ES
PRCFES~IONAL ASSOCIA.TfON
Mayor lack McKelvey and
City Council of the City of Andover
December 17, 1996
Page 4
4, It is suggested that the original approval of the Sup was somehow defective
because there was no site plem incolpOrated as pan of the approval process
which is now required. Certainly, site plan approval by the City Council is
required in SOme communities, but Andover is not one of them. Andover has
adopted a more policy-oriented role for its City Council, relying On staff to
review site plans for compliance with zoning and other regulatory requiTements
of the City. Be assured that Rademacher Companies will, as it has in the past,
continue to provide information and cooperation to City staff in bringing this
new development to a completed stage.
CONCLUSION;
In conclusion, the City of Andover has acted appropTiateIy in its review of the SUP request
by Rademacher Companies. The City Council that considCTc:d the matter in 1988 did so based
upon the criteria then in effect for development proposals in the City of Andover. 'When
another City Council had the oPPOrtunity to review the initiation of a sunset clause in 1990,
that City Council determined that it was in the best interest of the City of Andover not to
retroactively apply the new standard on special Use permits to those already held by property
owners. When the issue was revisited, again, in 1995, the City Council recognized that it had
certain obligations to the landowner that held the SUP and decided to live up to those
obligations.
Based upon a long-standing history of good relations with the City of Andover and based
upon assurances that the SuP was still in effect, Rademacher Companies has been proceeding
in good faith to develop the Property, Nothing in the recent part has convinced our client that
it should not proceed to complete the development and continue its ongoing contribution to
the tax base of the City of Andover.
The Council should reject any suggestion that good faith determinations made by past City
Councils should be reversed under the guise of the sunset clause. Especially when the
suggestion is not well supported in legislative history or in law.
Respectfully submitted,
PETERSEN, TEWS & SQUIRES
P FESSJPNAL ASSOCIATION
{twq .411~
Pa lM~ fl<
CC: Rademacher Companies, Inc.
William Hawkins, Esq.