The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC March 4, 1997 CITY of ANDOVER Regular City Council Meeting - March 4, 1997 agenda MEETING IS BEING HELDATFIRE STATION #1. 13875 CROSSTOWN BLVD. NW Call to Order - 7:00 PM Resident Forum Bookmark Agenda Approval ~ Consent Agenda Approval of Minutes minutes Discussion Items 1. Rezoning/Jeff Leadens, Cont. lead ens 2. Special Use Permit/J. Leadens, Cont. sup 3. Declare Biting Dog dog 4. Rezoning/Chesterton Commons rezonecc 5. Preliminary Plat/Chesterton Commons ppcc 6. Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Adolfson & Peterson compplan HRA Meeting 7. Public Hearing/CDBG/Award Public Service Agency Grants cdbg EDA Meeting 8. TIF Report tif . / 9. Request AssistanceIMedical Clinic medical Reports of Staff. Committees. Commissions 10. Appoint Comprehensive Plan Task Force taskf II. Schedule Special MeetinglFunding for Reconstruction Projects projects 12. Award Bid/94-30NFurniture Contract, Cont. bid9430a 13. Discuss Alternate Street Alignment/Bunker Lk. Blvd. Service Rd. (Phase II) bunker Non-Discussion/Consent Items 14. Rezoning/Hamilton Property rezoneh 15. Approve 1997 Park Dedication Expenditures parkded - 16. Approve 1997 Park Capital Improvement Bud get 17. Approve Plans & Specs/97-3/Cracksealing ps973 18. Approve Plans & Specs/97-4/Sealcoating ps974 19. Approve Plans & Specs/96-30/Timber Oaks Estates ps9630 20. Approve Revised Grading PlanIWoodland Estates woodland 21. Amend Ord. 59/Extending Cable TV Franchise ord59 22. Traffic Signal Warrants traffic 23. Award Bids/Engineering Vehicle & Water Dept. Vehicle vehicle 24. Adopt Ord. 15A (Repeal Ord. 15) ord15a 25. Adopt Ord. 19Q (Repeal Ord. 19) ord19q 26. Adopt Ord. 205/Adopting Minnesota State Building Code ord205 27. Adopt Ord. 17E (Repeal Ord. 17) ord17e 28. Adopt Ord. 204/Establishing Elevations & Standards/Bldg. & Driveway Const. ord204 19. Approve Resolution/Post Office Request postoff 30. Authorize to Solicit for Bids/Rescue Vehicle rescue Mayor-Council Input Pavment of Claims CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 4. 1997 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Approval of Minutes City ClerkJJ ITEM NO. Approval of Minutes The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes: February 18, 1997 Regular Meeting (Kunza absent) February 18, 1997 HRA Meeting , i / ;' CITY OF ANDOVER AGENDA SECTION r-o Discussion Item REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE March 4, 1997 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM r-o Rezoning 96-05, cont. Rezone R-l to GR, Sections 9 & 16 Jeff Leadens . Planning ~\jJW John Hinzman City Planner BY: /. Request The City Council is asked to review the rezoning request of Jeff Leadens to rezone approximately 34 acres from R-l, Single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation. The property is located at the terminus of 1 66th Lane NW, east of Round Lake Blvd. NW, and is part of the Terry's Turf Landscaping business. The applicant proposes to operate a golf driving range and putting course upon approval of the rezoning. A special use permit application for the golf facility has been submitted in conjunction with the rezoning ) petition. Background The rezoning request was tabled at the February 18, 1997 City Council meeting on the request of the applicant. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the application at the January 28, 1997 meeting. A number of people spoke in opposition of the proposal concerned about the potential increase in traffic, devaluation of property, and setting a precedent for other GR uses to occur on the site. The Commission voted unanimously to deny the rezoning application citing a negative impact on existing traffic conditions, property values, deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, and objections of the neighboring residents. Attached for your review are the staff report and minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and an amendment to Ordinance No.8. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ) CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO.8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 6.03, ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: Ordinance 8, Section 6.03, The Zoning District Map of the City of Andover is hereby amended from R-l, Single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation on the following legally described land: , ) Unplatted City of Andover the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County Minnesota (except the north 500 feet thereof) and (except the south 2 rods of the west 2 rods together with an easement over the west 1 rod of the north 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Southwest and over the south 1 rod of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the west 1 rod of the south 1 rod of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter for access purposes.) AND The northern 440 feet of Lot 6, Block 3, HUNTERS HOLLOW ADDITION lying west of County Ditch No.6. NOTE: All other Section of the Zoning Ordinance Shall remain as written and adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 1th day of March, 1997. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: lE. McKelvey, Mayor / Victoria V olk, City Clerk J If You or your family are concerned with any of the following issues please sign the Petition: #1. Rezoning would have a adverse effect on property values surrounding area rezoned. #2. The future expansion of commercial enterprises in the rezoned area. #3. The increased traffic potential through 164th Ave, Arrowhead St., 166th Ave. & Round Lake Blvd. , / #4. The changing of the City Of Andover's comprehensive development plan to rezone a residential area. #5. Potential commercial advertisement signs changing neighborhood aesthetics. #6. Commercial use of residential designed streets. #7. Potential environmental changes such as noise, pollution, etc.. J . , . j , / PETITION This is a petition against rezoning of residential (Rl) area to commercial recreation (GR) involving the properties described in SW Quarter of Section 9 & NW Quarter of Section 16 (See attached map for details) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NamelFamily Address Phone# Representing Signature , ) -Jpj;~~k----~;;6'2 g/!/y?.f"tlje2 ~~Jv. ---;S3 /;~b -------- (': -;cn.-I /'Y,a-f1!tf.J!1 Z 74 2 ,(p4 A-tt~ l,},,(,' '?53SS'5'.;L -),AIv iE il.'io H1lLlf. \_,hQ ~ \ ,,\'<'.E"> _ '<1::.f'J 1L,,~Mt:::~ Ii.cSo'z.. ~Rl~Ou)\-I~I~\) .st~'W 0- !..fp)..'i Ct'l.()CtlS 5/ II./W /' I icHfa3 6,'ffV-5b:eefChU tJ L.B-ur; e.. 6' 5e(1'SC,^er..1{. Arllll(rt-- 753-4/~{ :fia~!l. t.~/~~ ) PETITION . J This is a petition against rezoning of residential (R1) area to commercial recreation (GR) involving the properties described in SW Quarter of Section 9 & NW Quarter of Section 16 (See attached map for details) NameIFamily Address Phone# Representing Signature ------------------------------------------------TL ~ Io rYJ Wisf'er lidflVBJh.f\lJld Ct 7S3-'fn!t,\ b ~MuA.. " ., ~_ ~ ,....'--...... ,':>1:. - . . ~..........'--~ ~,'-"'-~ \ ~"-i,,\ \ ~,"~~~""""...c...~ s~~"\ .d(c>.,---~ ~~ ~ ' - J .' ) CITY OF ANDOVER AGENDA SECTION t-n Discussion Item REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 18,1997 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM t-n Rezoning 96-05 Rezone R-l to GR, Sections 9 & 16 Jeff Leadens Plmming i w<< APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: John Hinzman City Planner Request The applicant, Jeff Leadens has requested that this item be tabled until the March 4, 1997 City Council meeting. A copy of his request is attached. / , J MOTION BY: SECOND BY: / , / - '." i: i.I:' I , , I ---.) , /I /It (1)/.ul/ v? !})dy (h &:.l/L . ., .~J LiL&ld Li~r~ i ~af1L \LJ~ J.--0/u.i.a'~ / Z,j I~. )'Y'.LLZ5. ~J 7 t~/~. -{fLu ~U; ~f 1a~/ Y)Ulti~~ .. 'yLJ77 - 1t,.;("oLIt aUL} ~. ~ /lJa.:._du 11.. /} /;..1 ~ '.. .L<.7 LIU/LGt-L /~. . / 1~, //~ / CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 J PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - JANUARY 28, 1997 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Randy Peek on January 28, 1997, 7:00 p.m. at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners present: Maynard Apel, Lynette Barry, Mike Gamache, Jeffrey Luedtke, Jay Squires, Lorna Wells None Planning Intern, LaDawn Osmundson City Planning, John Hinzman City Planning, Jeff Johnson Community Development Director, Dave Carlberg Others Commissioners absent: Also present: APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 14, 1997: Correct as written. \ / MOTION by Luedtke, Seconded by Barry, to approve the Minutes as written. Motion carried unanimously. -;f PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: REZONING - R-l SINGLE FAMILY RURAL, TO GR, GENERAL RECREATION - SECTION !J - JEFF LEADENS 7:02 p.m. Mr. Hinzman reviewed the request of Jeff Leadens to rezone property located east of Round Lake Boulevard from R-1 to GR. The applicant is concurrently seeking a Special Use Permit to operate a golf driving range and putting course on the property. The southern portion of Lot 6 would remain R-1 for a homesite for the applicant. Access to the golf driving range would not be from 164th Lane. The property is surrounded by residential property on the east, south and west and vacant land to the north. It is not adjacent to a collector or arterial roadway, so traffic would enter along 166th Lane NW in Hunter's Hollow. The rezoning would lead to an intensification of the use that is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan because the property is designated for rural residential. There was a discussion on the permitted uses in a General Recreation zone, plus those uses allowed by Special Use Permit. The only other property zoned GR in the City is the Sunshine Park area south of City Hall. The only golf course in the City is Woodland Creek off South Coon Creek Drive, and Staff thought that zoning was R-4. J MOTION by Luedtke, Seconded by Wells, to open the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. 7:15 p.m. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 28, 1997 \ Page 2 ) (Public Hearing: Rezoning, R-1 to GR, Section 9 - Leadens, Continued) John Pouchak, 16462 Bittersweet Court and Tom Widhalm, 2742 164th Avenue - addressed the Commission on their reasons for opposing the proposal. Mr. Pouchak stated they were not aware that only the northwestern portion of Lot 6 was included in the rezoning request. He presented a list of concerns of the rsidents of commercial property in a residential area, those being the potential for lowering property values, traffic problems through residential areas, increased noise pollution because of the traffic, and the possibility of any number of other uses on that property in the future once it is rezoned. At the time of the petition there was also concern of access to the commercial property from 164th, as they did not know about the partial rezoning of Lot 6. They understand there is not a lot of buildable area. When Hunter's Hollow was being developed, the residents had asked that the low area through there be considered as a wildlife area. The City has said it is too expensive to maintain many small parks. They are concerned with any expansion in the area and feel the development of that area has not been thought out. They have a petition opposing the proposal. They have substantial data from the county assessor's office that property values would be lowered, and the recommendation from the assessor's office was not to proceed with this. Realtors have told them the same thing. Also,. this is outside of the Comprehensive Plan. There has been a lot of ;activity in the area with the construction of Hunter's Hollow, and they . understand change. But they feel to expand the area to commercial activities would be very detrimental to their neighborhood. They called Great Northern Driving Range on Highway 65 to determine a typical day's activity. Great Northern has 16 to 20 stations, and this proposal is for up to 32 stations. They are estimating 585 cars would drive through the residential area on a typical day based on the golf driving range only. If other activities were added, traffic would increase accordingly. They were told when Hunter's Hollow was being proposed that the house values would be $300,000 to $400,000. This proposal would be a detriment to those types of investments because of the concern of what that land could potentially be used for in the future. Cvndv Hatlestad, 3021 164th Lane - felt the same way, especially about what could become of the property in the future. Mike ? . 2720 164th Avenue - felt another concern is the bright lights at night coming from the golf driving range. They live out in the country, and having thousands of watts of light would be detrimental. Mr. Hinzman explained no lighting is being proposed for the use. Stenhanie Yant, 16489 A~rowhead - was the first one to move into the area when it was a deadend. Since the Leadens moved in, there has been '3 steady flow of crucks down the streets. She is concerned wich any /commercial use that would invite more traffic in and out of the neighborhood plus additional noise. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 28, 1997 Page 3 , , , (Public Hearing: Rezoning, R-1 to GR, Section 9 - Leadens, Continued) Jeff Leadens - stated the trucks will continue if this is not rezoned to a golf driving range. Their proposal is to build their house on Lot 6, so there will be no traffic to the golf driving range from 164th Lane. It is a matter of having cars or trucks coming down the street. There is not quite enough property to have a 9-hole golf course. Traffic would only come through 166th, and those people buying the lots would be told about that. That was in the agreement with Gold Nugget when they developed Hunter's Hollow. MOTION by Wells, Seconded by Barry, to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. 7:38 p.m. Mr. Hinzman explained that golf courses and golf driving ranges are treated differently. A golf course is a permitted use in the GR zone; a golf driving range is a conditional use. If rezoned, the Comprehensive Plan would have to be amended. Commissioner Wells stated she lives on the other side of Round Lake Boulevard and she is against this proposal. She feels this will only be a detriment to the area. She anticipated that the DNR would designate the ditch area a wetland. / From a pla~ning perspective, Chairperson Peek agreed with the comments of the neighbors. It doesn't make a lot of sense to landlock a commercial use surrounded by residents. It is not consistent with the Comorehensive Plan; and if it were rezoned, he felt it would have a neg~tive impact on the neighboring area. He didn't know if the data presented was accurate, but there would be an intensification of traffic through the residential area where the roads are not designed for commercial use. He is not in favor of the rezoning. Commissioner Apel agreed. His main concern is with the broad rezoning and the types of uses that are allowed. This is not a good place for it. Commissioner Squires felt when looking at the standards, the anticipated traffic and the'imoact on Hunter's Hollow, the broad uses that would be allowed under that zone, plus that it is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, two of the four criteria to be considered are not met. It may even be spot zoning. Commissioner Luedtke would not be in favor of the rezoning. The other rezonings that have been approved have been consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. This is not. Commissioners Barry and Gamache agreed with the others. Mr. Leadens asked if the property could be rezoned to GR and the use be restricted to a golf driving range. The Commission and Staff explained that cannot be done. MOTION by Wells, Seconded by Barry, to forward a denial to the City Council based upon the crit~ria of the rezoning of ~he land. It does have whac we feel is a negative impact on existing traffic conditions, property values, is against the Comprehensive Plan and based on the objections of the res:dents of the surrounding la~d. Motion carried una~imously. This will be placed on the February 18, 1997, City Council agenda. 7:55 p.m. , ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION January 28, 1997 DATE AGENDA ITEM 3. Public Hearing: REZ 96-05, cont. Rezone R-l to GR, Sections 9 & 16 Jeff Leadens ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT . ,/ Planning -j vJ{'\ John Hinzman BY: Citv Planner APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: Request The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the rezoning request of Jeff Leadens to rezone property from R-l, Single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation. The application was tabled at the January 14, 1997 Planning and Zoning Commission due to the applicant revising his plans to incorporate more land into the proposal. The property is located east of Round Lake Blvd. at the terminus of I 66th Lane NW in the Hunters Hollow Subdivision and is legally described on the attached ordinance amendment. The applicant is concurrently seeking a special use permit and proposes to operate a golf driving range and putting course on the property. Applicable Ordinances ) Ordinance No.8, Section 5.02, establishes the procedure for changing zoning district boundaries (rezoning). Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(B), establishes the criteria for granting a Special Use Permit. These same criteria have been utilized by the City in considering rezoning applications in the past. The criteria include the following: the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the occupants of surrounding land, the existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on _ adjacent streets and land, the effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. Ordinance No.8, Section 6.01, defines the General Recreation District as providing a location for all types of commercial recreation uses such as golf driving ranges, outdoor theaters, race tracks, and snowmobile areas, most of which require large amounts of land and good separation from residential uses. / Page Two Rezoning - R-I to GR Jeff Leadens , January 28, 1997 ) Land Use Plan The land use plan designates this area as RR, Rural Residential. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use North East South West R-I, vacant land R-I, Lund's Evergreen Estates 2nd & 3rd Additions R-I, Hunter's Hollow Addition R-3, unplatted residences R-I, Hunter's Hollow Addition General Review The proposed area is surrounded by single family homes and vacant land and is not adjacent to a collector or arterial roadway. Traffic could increase along I 66th Lane NW between the entrance to the proposed area and Round Lake Boulevard NW. Rezoning of the parcel would lead to an intensification of use that is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. / Commission Options 1. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning request of Jeff Leadens to rezone property from R-I, Single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation, legally described on the attached amendment to Ordinance No.8, Section 6.03. 2. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City Council denial of the rezoning request of Jeff Leadens to rezone property from R-I, Single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation, legally described on the attached amendment to Ordinance No.8, Section 6.03. The Planning and Zoning Commission finds the proposal does not meet the requirements of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(B). 3. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item pending further information from the applicant or Staff. Attachments J A-I Ordinance Amendment A-2 Area Location Map A-3 Land Use Plan Map A-4 Application for Rezoning A-5 Notice of Public Hearing () -; -< o IJ '" ~ :r> 0 Z ." CJ o < JTI :;u , olL.. .-;!!! J' '! , ) I """I I. ~ " i " I JHI"J I '~l '~LLl IiI... 1- I- II [] ~ ,I II I / ". ~. / >0"1:1(;1 -n~~1:J Vl ::: iO"l:l 5' :<l:<l~."g. n.Q!lIl~ .go=< t;;~~~~E.V1o on""""." '-<! ""1 t1. C. g'l:j ~ !l. ~ Eo ~ n n Eo'i'". , ? ;;::C:<l na-~ E!: g ~ ~ Vl n 6' ~re. El n _. 'T1 ~[ '< =:'.1 _0. ~ =:: 1 -.~ ~ ~ ~ c: ~ ~ ~ "d '" ~ ~ 11! ..... Vo '" . ..... , I T , I I ~. .. I - - T - .-.'-. 7' I - - , 1/2 S CI4 K'W oo1;~\ f"...... ........ --.XiiW/i /~ , I~ 4 'I .L ,. ... - r-" 0.. .- . -' I- _ 2, E~*A T~S " 2 S~ -:s- I II ~. . riAl...' Tj V .. ..._. ~ I & 10 " S t~14 7;~S7 " , / K r 'I 21( 'iA {; p- E C. "2 -'1 DP:' T! 0 ft( s -; I .. 2 3 ! , '" 'S '" /2" - ,s K - I i I .. . -- I I 'I . I c I iulV,ds, \ 3E~, -Rff1EfN E$TATESI1 3,1 I ~ I [ , , 5'(lL ~i ' ~)~O~ J ~ 4 J ~: fl"'f, 1-;-' ~ 12 ,C./',ffl'G 1,.p.,.>t:5z_ 2 . I~ E 5 ., ,.. LU~ ' J !~~ ~~ 2 4 1;,/h.;- ~ r E~ATES t 7 ~51" -'RD, 2 II 5' ~ t~ · \ -' A~ '- ~~~ , ; tI~poJt;. ~ ~O? ;U\ ~1)Ll \ s Z. "'. -......_, 7 & 32 , i 3 i 3 I J OR' I 6 I :II I I ,. . I \2 I I 22 3 ".ill' M~ADb~ 3 6 I :131 4 i . I K LA. ~ ~ z i " 8 I I : /: 5 3 I 4 I :I 1 4 I 5 I ". .\9~~' 3' , .. 'X- ~' -(,jl . I ' ir:- ( ~'J ''':4 :':~ - :\ ~5 ~.,\ ri ' 1:5/400 'I \17~ ~ 6 ..16.~ itA . ~~~o ~~;~ ~ ,.. ~ ~_ ~ ' , ;0 4 8 ~;/ /3 I ) \ \ \ ,&,. N. . ' ~ ~ \ ., -,-;..-' / 2 I 1."sL. - LA..;l.' - - - - '\.... Y "'! 5 ~ AOOl" 2 " / '" ! ftl.... I/~~ ~~ kp~k \\~9; 4 3 ~ 'T 21+ -' & 7 8 gi~E .. = L . ... I " ~- 0: , 00' .... ~ ~~ /2 2 ,.~,._ I;; s~ ~~~" I . 2 2 3 s 3 . . - QlTLDT A ~ I --:; 2 421 0: ...~\ftO! I 3 I .oaJNOANT LIF>: I ALLIANCE I ! ! ~ I , I \"\ ~ II :\ II " ,I :I - 3 ,.. . .......... . . ..'" _........ v.. .. - .c ';1 8 , I 2 - ~PI(fE- o6O'"~'.. r- ~ Ht4L~V' ~~. I::: J _~- 5 ~\ I \.. . ,....,,..,,. '.,?,\ ! l I I , I i I \ ! ! , I , ! 'VO'U~.fI( I , I . ----.: . I . , I I 1 , , i YArUHAL GAS '""Pf"L,NE : II 'CEV-EII4.//'IIE/ / \~ -~ -:'to "'::":.-. CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 REZONING REQUEST FORM Property Address ;),977 - /&& LA-1.J~ ANdIJL/e.I0 Legal Description of Property: (Fill in whichever .is appropriate): Lot Block Addition PIN m -3J.-d.l\-- 34- cco''1- Q@- Is the property: Abstract I~ information must be provide~ County) . (If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal description). or Torrens ? (This can be obtained from the -_._-------------------------------------------------------------- dA.uu..Af Jt t:L 11 elL . .J (lit Il"f 1/1 f 1.1 ALl 17 ; .J A f: t1 j~' ~l ^-k14, a. .Lrd _ _ 1-nA.r/J Reason for Request , / f . f2-- 1- SII1(J I e~; (,/ a~ Me t"':'b ~~::::~-~::~:~-~-~-~~~~:~~~~~-_::~~::~:~-~::~:~-~~~~~ Name of Applicant Jelf L f'o~/?5 Address d.77&.. /r...,.;~ /.).U~ 11...1(_;) AndtJJeJ? , Horne Phone '753 - 3113 Business Phone '753 -1ii5z'1Q Signature /7r:? -.7.- ~~,..--- Date t7'~~/9 r(' -----------------------------------------------------------.------ .' --.-----.-.. , J Horne Phone /~--- . -----~. 5 l,gR-a-t u r e Business Date ----------------------------------------------------------------- , I CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday, January 14, 1997 at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Blvd. NW, Andover, Minnesota to review the rezoning request of Jeff Leadens to rezone a parcel from R-1, Single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation on property located at 2977 166th Lane (PIN 09-32-24-34-0004) legally described as the following: ) , Unplatted City of Andover the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County Minnesota (except the north 500 feet thereof) and (except the south 2 rods of the west 2 rods together with an easement over the west 1 rod of the north 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Southwest and over the south 1 rod of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the west 1 rod of the south 1 rod of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter for access purposes.) All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and location. A copy of the application and location will be available at the Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting. The above information will also be available for public review at the Oak View Middle School on the evening prior to the meeting. k~u. Q.i{;,A:-'z-.-J Shirley CJ(nton, Deputy City Clerk Publication dates: January 3, 1997 January 10, 1997 ) '\ , I CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.w. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday, January 28, 1997 at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Blvd. NW, Andover, Minnesota to review the rezoning request of Jeff Leadens to rezone a parcel from R-l, Single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation on property located at 2977 166th Lane (PIN 09-32-24-34-0004) legally described as the following the following: , / Unplatted City of Andover the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County Minnesota (except the north 500 feet thereof) and (except the south 2 rods of the west 2 rods together with an easement over the west 1 rod of the north 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Southwest and over the south 1 rod of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the west 1 rod of the south 1 rod ofthe Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter for access purposes.) and Lot 6 Block 3 HUNTERS HOLLOW ADDITION All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and location. A copy of the application and location will be available at the Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting. The above information will also be available for public review at the Oak View Middle _School on the evening prior to the meeting. Publication dates: January 17, 1997 January 24, 1997 ) PIN: 093224330001 GOLD NUGGET DEVEL INC 8857 ZEALAND AVE N ~ . ')OKL YN PK MN 55445 , / PIN: 093224340002 SNYDER ROBERT K & JUDY 2858 167TH LN NW ANOKA MN 55304 PIN: 093224340004 LEAD ENS JEFFREY J & THERESA 2776 164TH LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 093224430006 BENSON THEODORE A & LAURA D 16552 ARROWHEAD ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 093224430012 RINGER STEVEN C & JOYCE J 16652 CROCUS ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 , J PIN: 163224120007 EISENSCHENK JAMES & LAURIE 16463 BITTERSWEET CT NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 163224120009 POUCHAK JOHN G 16462 BITTERSWEET CT NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 163224220002 HATLESTAD TROY A & CYNTHIA M 3021 164TH LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 163224220010 MICKLEY TODD J & RUTH C 3020 164TH LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304 J PIN: 093224340001 NEUMANN JACK L 2934 167TH LN NW ANOKA MN 55304 PIN: 093224340003 GOLD NUGGET DEVEL INCL 8857 ZEALAND AVE N BROOKLYN PARK MN 55445 PIN: 093224430005 THOMES KENNETH B & DIANE R 16582 ARROWHEAD ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 093224430011 DILLING KEITH E & LINDA M 16682 CROCUS ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 093224430013 WINFIELD RICHARD & BARBARA 16624 CROCUS ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 163224120008 WISNER THOMAS N & CHERYL B 16476 BITTERSWEET CT NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 163224210001 GOLD NUGGET DEVEL INC 8857 ZEALAND AVE N BROOKLYN PARK MN 55445 PIN: 163224220003 GALVAN SHIRLEY M 3041 164TH LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304 , / CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - JANUARY 14, 1997 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Mo ly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called order by Chairperson Jay Squires on January 14, 1997, 7:04 p.m. at the 0 15400 Hanson Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners present: Maynard A 1, Lynette Barry, Jeffrey Luedtke, Randy Peek, None City Planning, Jef Commissioners absent: Also present: APPROVAL OF MINUTES December 10, 1996: Correct as written. MOTION by Luedtke, Seconded by Wells, approval as presented. carried unanimously. I I PUBLIC HEARINGS: REZONING {R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RURAL, TO GR, GENERAL RECREATION - SECTION 9} and SPECIAL USE PERMIT {GOLF DRIVING RANGE AND PUTTING COURSE} 2989 166TH LANE NW - JEFF LEADENS Mr. Johnson explained the applicant has revised his plans to incorporate more land into the proposal; therefore, public hearing notices must be mailed to other property owners. The items are tentatively scheduled for the January 28, 1997, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. MOTION by Wells, Seconded by Luedtke, to table Items 3 and 4 to January 28 due to notification. Motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCES - ORDINANCE NO. 200, MOVING OF BUILDINGS Mr. Johnso explained the proposal is to repeal Ordinance 4 and Section 4.11 of Ordin e 8, and Staff has drafted a new Ordinance 200 and an amendment to Or J.: nce 8, Section 7.03, Special Uses. Special Use Permits will now be ired for homes to be moved onto residential properties in the City. He en highlighted the sections of the proposed Ordinance 200. A public he . ng before the Planning Commission is scheduled for January 28, 1997. .' Commissioner Peek asked if this only a building off a person's property. Mr. Johnson stated no pe . 't would be needed for a building to be moved to another location on the s property as long setback requirements are needed, but a new buildin needed if a foundation is added. J --.... ') '. ' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION January 14, 1997 DATE AGENDA ITEM 3. Public Hearing: REZ 96-05 Rezone R-1 to GR, Section 9 Jeff Leadens ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT . \ ./ Planning -5\\JX\ John Hinzman BY: Citv Planner APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: Request The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to table the rezoning request of Jeff Leadens to rezone property from R-1, Single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation. Due to the applicant revising his plans to incorporate more land into the proposal, public hearing notices were not mailed to all property owners within 350 feet of the proposed rezoning area, as required by state statute. The application is tentatively scheduled for the January 28, 1997 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. , I I CITY OF ANDOVER AGENDA SECTION Nl Discussion Item REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE March 4, 1997 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM Nl Special Use Permit 96-27, cont. Golf Driving Range & Putting Course Sections 9 & 16, JeffLeadens Planning \y 6W John Hinzman City Planner BY: ~. Request The City Council is asked to review the special use permit request of Jeff Leadens to operate a golf driving range and putting course. The proposed area is located at the terminus of I 66th Lane NW, east of Round Lake Blvd. NW, and is part of the Terry's Turf Landscaping business, and is currently zoned R-I, Single Family Rural. An application to rezone the land to GR, General Recreation has been submitted in conjunction with the special use permit petition. J Background The special use permit request was tabled at the February 18, 1997 City Council meeting on the request of the applicant. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the application at the January 28,1997 meeting. A number of people spoke in opposition of the proposal concerned about the potential increase in traffic, devaluation of property, and setting a precedent for other GR uses to occur on the site. The Commission voted unanimously to deny the special use permit application citing a negative impact on existing traffic conditions, property values, deviation from the Comprehensive Plan, and .objections of the neighboring residents. Attached for your review are the staff report and minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and resolutions for denial of the application. j MOTION BY: SECOND BY: '. J CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -97 A RESOLUTION DENYING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF JEFF LEADENS TO OPERATE A GOLF DRIVING RANGE AND PUTIING COURSE PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 7.03 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2977 I66TH LANE NW (pIN 09-32-24-34-0004). WHEREAS, Jeff Leadens has requested a Special Use Permit to operate a golf driving range and putting course pursuant to Ordinance No.8, Sections 5.03 and 7.03 on property located at 2977 166th Lane NW, legally described as the following: . / Unplatted City of Andover the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County Minnesota (except the north 500 feet thereot) and (except the south 2 rods of the west 2 rods together with an easement over the west I rod of the north 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Southwest and over the south I rod of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the west 1 rod of the south I rod of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter for access purposes.) and The northern 440 feet of Lot 6, Block 3, HUNTERS HOLLOW ADDITION lying west of County Ditch No.6. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request does not meet the criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 and 7.03; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the City of Andover; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council denial of the Special Use Permit as requested. j NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and denies the Special Use Permit on said property for the following reasons: ; Page Two SUP 96-27, Jeff Leadens 2977 166th Lane NW March 4, 1997 I) That the proposed application would have a negative impact on existing traffic conditions. . 2) That the proposed application would have a negative impact on surrounding property values. 3) That the proposed application is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this ~ day of March, 1997. CITY OF ANDOVER . J ATIEST: J.E. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk j . . ) If You or your family are concerned with any of the following issues please sign the Petition: #1. Rezoning ~ould have a adverse effect on property values surrounding area rezoned. #2. The future expansion of commercial enterprises in the rezoned area. #3. The increased traffic potential through 164th A ve~ Arrowhead St., 166th Ave. & Round Lake Blvd. , ~ ) #4. The changing of the City Of Andover's comprehensive development plan to rezone a residential area. #5. Potential commercial advertisement signs changing neighborhood aesthetics. .... #6. Commercial use of residential designed streets. .' #7. Potential environmental changes such as noise. . .... ' pollution, etc.. . ) PETITION This is a petition against rezoning of residential (R1) area to commercial recreation (GR) involving the properties described in SW Quarter of Section 9 & NW Quarter of Section 16 (See attached map for details) NamelFamiIy Address Phone# JpJV'~h1k Representing Signature /61./t2 /5/m=;€.f'tlj€ercr:Nw, 7j-3/s;fb -K7'Z->' f/Y'Q./AGJ!1 Z 74 Z 'G74 A-ttcr 1..: vl./ .-:,,;,iuvG. iC\Oi-\1ll.:'l \..; ,0.. 'l'::,/ \ ,\,,, 1'\.....,,') _ I<:c,"; . (it.~4-tt:.) I~S'iS'2.. AS~..I~cu;\-I~,\.i) .st ~~ i~:...I.4.. f.}A~/.> t..' I .".: ('d I:f. ..J) ! " Iv). 'f C lx" C t1 S 5 I /'v' U/ ~ / / u.l 30,').1 1(; II I_Q^ e- 2,(;;).0 l ~/ ~lYLe , PETITION ;' This is a petition against rezoning of residential (RI) area to commercial recreation (GR) involving the properties described in SW Quarter of Section 9 & NW Quarter of Section 16 (See attached map for details) Name/Family Address Phone#- Representing Signature TL F ~,!/1 I Ui'S0Qr -:-v~ ~'.....'--a............ ~,.....\.....- ~, '-"'-"- ~ ,', , C-t 753-. 1& ,~~- \ ~""\ \ ~'t'~~~\.........c...~ S":...~"', , j .' .' , .I CITY OF ANDOVER AGENDA SECTION t\O. Discussion Item REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 18,1997 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM t\O. Special Use Permit 96-27 Golf Driving Range & Putting Course Sections 9 & 16, Jeff Leadens Planning .....<. t+- - jJJ BY: John Hinzman City Planner Request The applicant, Jeff Leadens has requested that this item be tabled until the March 4, 1997 City Council meeting. A copy of his request is attached. \ j ., ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: , / "::{j" // Fit; i ik /L:kl/Ir' v? IJJdy (2 aL,'- ' -, J 1/ /. / . ' - . , UL/0..t4.. J-u~ u 'f-a~ \LILt...' Jdki.(.~ /2"17 v}'Y'~~J t~v' -t./Lv did; ~f 1)a~/ Jj~ _ . ,~q77 - 1t;~1~" aLIL) v6 ~ ma.J.....dLJ 11. /1 . /j . 1 . , '~ LIUA.u-L /r~. J 1<-L'~ ' //~ , / Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 28, 1997 '-Page 4 ) it! PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: SPECIAL USE PERMIT - GOLF DRIVING RANGE AND ~ PflTTING COURSE - 2989 166TH LANE NW - JEFF LEADENS 7:55 p.m. Mr. Hinzman reviewed the request of Jeff Leadens to operate a golf driving range and putting course on property located east of Round Lake Boulevard on the' existing Terry's Turf sod farm location. The existing building would be utilized for office and storage space, and the boxes would be constructed to the south, facing southeast. Fencing would be providing along the perimeter of the driving area, and the complex would not be lit. MOTION by Squires, Seconded by Luedtke, to open the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. 7:58 p.m. Tom Widhalm. 2742 164th Avenue - turned in the petition opposing the proposal. MOTION by Squires, Seconded by Apel, to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. 8:00 p.m. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Luedtke, using the Resolution provided by Staff, to deny the Special Use Permit request of Jeff Leadens to operate, a golf driving range on the basis that they are recommending denial of .~he rezoning, that it would adversely affect existing and anticipated traffic conditions and it is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried unanimously. This will be placed on the February 18, 1997, City Council agenda. 8:03 p.m. LIC HEARING: AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT CONSTRUCT ACCESSORY TURE PRIOR TO PRINCIPAL - 16473 VALLEY DRIVE NW - MICHAEL AND SUSAN 8: 03. p. m. Osmundson reviewed the request of Michael and Susan Bleeker for Amended Special Use Permit to construct an accessory structure prior t the principal structure at 16473 Valley Drive. The structure would be nstructed of metal and utilized for storage of equipment and machiner The Bleekers currently operate a commercial greenhouse on the propert . She reviewed the ordinances and criteria to be considered, noting the Ci Council approved a Special Use Permit to operate a commercial greenhous on the property in June, 1995. The Bleekers have agreed to build a p . cipal structure within one year of the construction of the accessory st cture. open the public hearing. MOTION by Luedtke, Seconded by Gamache, Motion carried unanimously. 8:10 p.m. Sue Bleeker. 16473 Vallev Drive - stated they aske years before they would have to build a house on th_ 'would like more time to arrange for that construction. a period of two roperty. They MOTION by Barry, Seconded by Wells, to close the public hearin carried u~animously. 8:12 p.m. \ , / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE January 28, 1997 BY: John Hinzman City 1" 5wK APPROVED FOR AGENDA AGENDA ITEM 4. Public Hearing: SUP 96-27, cont. Golf Driving Range & Putting Course Sections 9 & 16, JeffLeadens ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning BY: Request The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the Special Use Permit request of Jeff Leadens to operate a golf driving range and putting course. The application was tabled at the January 14, 1997 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting due to the applicant revising his plans to incorporate more land into the proposal. The property is located east of Round Lake Blvd. NW. at the terminus of I 66th Lane NW in the Hunters Hollow Addition and is legally described on the attached resolution. The applicant is concurrently seeking to rezone the parcel from R-I, Single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation. I Applicable Ordinances Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, regulates the Special Use Permit process and outlines the following criteria for review: I) The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding land. 2) The existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land. 3) The effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area. 4) The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03 allows golf driving ranges and putting courses via a special use permit in a GR, General Recreation District. / Page Two SUP 96-27, JeffLeadens 2977 I 66th Lane NW January 28, 1997 Adjacent Zoning and Land Use Adjacent zoning and land use iriclude: North East South West R-I, vacant land R-I, LWld's Evergreen Estates 2nd & 3rd Additions R-I, HWlter's Hollow Addition R-3, Wlplatted residences R-I, HWlter's Hollow Addition Background The applicant proposes to construct a golf driving range at the existing Terry's Turf sod farm location. The existing building would be utilized for office and storage space. Approximately 50-60 tee boxes would be constructed to the south of the existing building, facing southeast. Fencing would be provided along the perimeter of the driving area, and the complex would not be lit. ., J The proposed area is surroWlded by single family homes and Wldeveloped land and is not adjacent to a collector or arterial roadway. Traffic could increase along I 66th Lane NW between the entrance to the proposed area and ROWld Lake Boulevard. Rezoning of the parcel would lead to an intensification of use that is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. Commission Options I. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City COWlcil approval of the Special Use Permit request of Jeff Leadens on property located at 2977 I 66th Lane NW, legally described on the attached resolution. The Commission finds the request meets the requirements of Ordinance No.8. 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City COWlcil denial of the Special Use Permit request of Jeff Leadens on property located at 2977 I 66th Lane NW, legally described on the attached resolution. The Commission finds the request does not meet the requirements of Ordinance No.8. In recommending denial of the request, the Commission shall state those reasons for doing so. , / Page Three ) SUP 96-27, JeffLeadens 2977 166th Lane NW January 28, 1997 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item pending further information from Staff. Attached please find resolutions for approval and denial of the Special Use Permit. Attachments A-I Resolution Approving the Special Use Permit A-2 Resolution Denying the Special Use Permit A-3 Area Location Map A-4 Site Plan A-5 Special Use Permit Application A-6 Notice of Public Hearing I , J ,nlUr IIlUII IIIl1tt .I 1''''''1 ".. II i " I "'1"1 () -l -< o "TJ~ 1; ):> 0 Z ." o o oiL .-;l~J' -, ) I .;'ll ,E:(~ 1..11- Il,- I o ,I " I , >O"<l@ -n;>:l;>:l;>:l In -< ;;::C;>:l .. i. 0'" SO """ 'O~ ~~~ ~.g. .g ~\ E B ~~~E.(nn ~ ~ g a. g. ~ -g :J. ,,. e. e. n 11 e!.fc;""tl n ~ ~ a e:[ ;1 a In n Er ~~. a n _. ." -<[ '. ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ '::! "<l ~ ~ J g ~ - u. ;a - uLul__u_ ~__ 1. . ._.'f--.. --------- I ......"'............."...........:.:...,..;:::.~....t~- -- . .......,..:................ ....-.:::..-.::...:..:.:.:..~.. 4 ....\.. .:.....:.:...,....\,:.... S I I.! - ,_ 4 ~!:IiI{-> ~ l- I-- , , \/2 S ~~ K'W 001'\\ " \ 2, E~1A T~S " 2 I s~ I 2X~~D~EJ s2 ,I .. I AoiO/T/ON , I 6 J ~ I , 4 I I i I I ; I i :1 I 4 ,_7L. Urn V " ,...~. ~..t 6 J r~ I~ 7;c,"S' " 3 I 12,., -... IJ r~R1IRLE' I ,2 , : .. I ; I i: ~4: " s MEADOWS '3 ~ I, I Z 1 = , ~ '- 31 ,I 2 21 3 i .,. 8 41 1 I :5' I n ~. - i.uNdszI3E~ fRGREt , I I · i ' H .. - ! I I I i a .. ESTAfES\ 3 3 ; Ij I i I I I tQi I - \ ~ I)L 5 ~ I I ' C\JI I JtlO~ !. 4 L../ - I I .;J, \.. . ;;;;' . ~ f; I i "... I - -- - I, ;fG fl , 5. r-- l- S 3 ! 4 I :5 i ! I I: i 1 12 ,€V~ fS'r~r~ z 3 ! 2_-:- 14 i 5 i ~'I ~U~1 1 J b , .. v- J .:; ~;,. I. , ~ ~e~~' 13' !-: I "U' j'-"l ~ m~=s 5' \t ',&/ ~5l ; < .) 7'1 6 [5 17' I r-f\. "-.... '---J,. A~ .\ ~~~ I . OOTH UoNe, ..w. ' 4n~t!:'l~.........: I 4 f' 44 : $ - I$\O~ 5 ~. .\ j , "-., ' ~O' ~ '~o I "I \171i6J \ ~ z.:.. .:.: 6 ~E.~ IIA ~ 4 \ s ;-ztl.. '/,tlO ~:~r~d~ \= 7' 4 8 ~~.J 3. " . L I I ~ ~ ' .,.. ~ I I 2 I 1101151 CA. .1 - - -l " Y ~ i I 5 ~~?~__~_., t I "\ / ~ "I I ~.IIJ" I~ ~ Jx;,d ),.l~~ ~ p~k 6~\~e~ 4 3 !;1 2 '\J 4 ~ 6 ,\s 'lc1: I :5 \ I ~ · c." I ___ ~~ ~ - .. I 3 2-1 o. .... 2 4 ~o ~~ o 2 :;:'-' /2 - 3 ",\~ ! ~~~ 1 3 I ~~~ _' ,... .... ...... . ......::;;0_.... ......_.......- ...d..._._...._............ ........-.. ..... .... ... ...-............. ................-.-. ~~/~/~ I /_ ~ 1 \ I : I I - rll.W'c;;.- >60''''.!-,...)--. l \ 2 i / ' .r.......'. I YO!O<,,€.y V4r/lRAL GAS "...l'~E .. HIIlLS, V' 4, '. ~ i !""Y'HUY'; -:::\ J /6 (,,1 I : ,.. """,..., I,:: C 1 t 31 l /. i I..., d , .04 I '...... " ,'. i 3 ' ! :R 6 ! , ~MEADb~ 3 6 ! :5 31 4 12 i 221 .! I I 1 I , 56TH I..1Nf 3 4 1M ",-y OUnoT A r- I r- i """""'"" "FE AUlANCE I i , i ! r' I \'\ ~ _____.IVr.' / l. .... ~ ... ------ _.~ / r--;. . Lj 1\ L L 1\ f.. C 1\ / I'I[I/.I . I !::-,(. I II, (" Ed [-/ l v' ~V .on} \ U '\ 1)., I I I , i _._._._._p _i .~\ ", " '\ '~, '" CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. · ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 / SPECIAL OSE PERMIT Property Address ;;fi77 /(,{,--fl-LN Legal Description of Property: (Fill in whichever is appropriate): Lot Block Addition PIN q- 32-2Y-?f-OUO<{ (If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal description.) Is the property: Abstract ~ or Torrens ? (This information must be provide~ can be obtained from the County. ) ;:::::-;::-;:;:::~-~-r~~--;s--i€~idi;~"HO~7i-~~~~CJ-- It te. -tv Or(/Z...-k ~ 90 t-( diiVtfl7 tZvt7- u,uJ ,o.--+n~ (ld../fre I Section of Ordinance No.. ~, ~cf5.o3 Current Zoning t-! __________________________~~i_l~ol_:~~i~-~~-------___________ LeO-dPfl5 Name of Applicant Address Q.'lI(., Je+F IG L{-ft- Home Phone Business Phone Signature ~if~ /); "-j~._,.._..,,.l...---=- Date (.J--/1/ ~f.' /:/.:'. .r .....- . . ------------ -.-------------------------------------------------- r1 o-l~/ J: ~." ,-L~.,.v~ r / I .. v / " Property Owner (Fee Owner) (If different from above) Address .?- ') 7 f. / ~<j~J.. c-.&t.:-< /1-/ /:..-- /7 ~'---=- .' Home Phone 75-5 -? "i'/ ) Business Phone 757-5;2 '7 '/ Signature /}#~~~'7/7"- Date I ?7i/7f.' /.'; ,/ . ----------------------------------------------------------------- J / CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 553D4 . (612) 755-5100 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday, January 14, 1997 at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Blvd. NW, Andover, Minnesota to review the rezoning request of Jeff Leadens to rezone a parcel from R-l, Single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation on property located at 2977 166th Lane (PIN 09-32-24-34-0004) legally described as the following: , / Unplatted City of Andover the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 9, TO\\mship 32, Range 24, Anoka County Minnesota (except the north 500 feet thereof) and (except the south 2 rods of the west 2 rods together with an easement over the west 1 rod of the north 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Southwest and over the south 1 rod of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the west 1 rod of the south 1 rod of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter for access pUIposes.) All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and location. A copy of the application and location will be available at the Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting. The above information will also be available for public review at the Oak View Middle School on the evening prior to the meeting. k:.4~ M~~ Shirley Cr(nton, Deputy City Clerk Publication dates: January 3, 1997 January 10, 1997 / . " CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday, January 28, 1997 at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Blvd. NW, Andover, Minnesota to review the rezoning request of Jeff Leadens to rezone a parcel from R-l, Single Family Rural to GR, General Recreation on property located at 2977 166th Lane (pIN 09-32-24-34-0004) legally described as the following the following: '. / Unplatted City of Andover the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County Minnesota (except the north 500 feet thereof) and (except the south 2 rods of the west 2 rods together with an easement over the west 1 rod of the north 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Southwest and over the south 1 rod of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the west 1 rod of the south 1 rod of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter for access purposes.) and Lot 6 Block 3 HUNTERS HOLLOW ADDITION All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and location. A copy of the application and location will be available at the Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting. The above information will also be available for public review at the Oak View Middle ,School on the evening prior to the meeting. Publication dates: January 17, 1997 January 24, 1997 .' ) PIN: 093224330001 GOLD NUGGET DEVEL INC 8857 ZEALAND AVE N "ROOKL YN PK MN 55445 . J PIN: 093224340002 SNYDER ROBERT K & JUDY 2858 167TH LN NW ANOKA MN 55304 PIN: 093224340004 LEADENS JEFFREY J & THERESA 2776 164TH LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 093224430006 BENSON THEODORE A & LAURA D 16552 ARROWHEAD ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 093224430012 RINGER STEVEN C & JOYCE J 16652 CROCUS ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 ., . / '~IN: 163224120007 EISEN SCHENK JAMES & LAURIE 16463 BITTERSWEET CT NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 163224120009 POUCHAK JOHN G 16462 BITTERSWEET CT NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 163224220002 HATLESTAD TROY A & CYNTHIA M 3021 164TH LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 163224220010 MICKLEY TODD J & RUTH C 3020 164TH LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304 ) , PIN: 093224340001 NEUMANN JACK L 2934 167TH LN NW ANOKA MN 55304 PIN: 093224340003 GOLD NUGGET DEVEL INCL 8857 ZEALAND AVE N BROOKLYN PARK MN 55445 PIN: 093224430005 THOMES KENNETH B & DIANE R 16582 ARROWHEAD ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 093224430011 DILLING KEITH E & LINDA M 16682 CROCUS ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 093224430013 WINFIELD RICHARD & BARBARA 16624 CROCUS ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 163224120008 WISNER THOMAS N & CHERYL 8 16476 BITTERSWEET CT NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 163224210001 GOLD NUGGET DEVEL INC 8857 ZEALAND AVE N BROOKLYN PARK MN 55445 PIN: 163224220003 GALVAN SHIRLEY M 3041 164TH LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304 .' , ) CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - JANUARY 14, 1997 MINUTES The egular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commiss was called to order by Chairperson Jay Squires on January 14, 1997, 7:04 at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Boulevard NW, Andover, M~ esota. Commissioners Maynard Apel, Lynette Barry, Jeffrey Luedtke, Peek, Lorna Wells Commissioners absent: Also present: None City Plan . g, Jeff Johnson December 10, 1996: Correct as written. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION by Luedtke, Seconded by Wells, approval as presented. carried unanimously. ',./ PUBLIC HEARINGS: . REZONING (R-1,. SINGLE FAMILY RURAL, TO GR,GBNBRAL RECREATION - SECTION 9) and SPECIAL USE PERMIT (GOLF DRIVING RANGE AND PTJTTING COl1RSE) 2989 166m LANE NW - JEFF LBADBNS Mr. Johnson explained the applicant has revised his plans to incorporate more land into the proposal; therefore, public hearing notices must be mailed to other property owners. The items are tentatively scheduled for the January 28, 1997, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. MOTION by Wells, Seconded by Luedtke, to table Items 3 and 4 to January 28 due. to notification. Motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCES - ORDINANCE NO. 200, MOVING OF BUILDINGS Mr. Johnson lained the proposal is to repeal Ordinance 4 and Section 4.11 of Ordinan , and Staff has drafted a new Ordinance 200 and an amendment to Ordinan 8, Section 7.03, Special Uses. Special Use Permi ts will now be requ d for homes to be moved onto residential properties in the City. He the . hlighted the sections of the proposed Ordinance 200. A public hearing fore the Planning Commission is scheduled for January 28, 1997. Commissioner Peek asked if this only affects m person's property. Mr. Johnson stated no permit wou e needed for a ) building to be moved to another location on the same prope as setback requirements are needed, but a new building permit needed if a foundation is added. '\ I '. / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE January 14, 1997 AGENDA ITEM 4. Public Hearing: SUP 96-27 Golf Driving Range & Putting Course Section 9, Jeff Leadens ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning APPROVED FOR AGENDA Jeff Johnson BY: Zonin!! Admini BY: Request The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to table the special use permit request of Jeff Leadens to operate a golf driving range and putting course in Section 9. Due to the applicant revising his plans to incorporate more land into the proposal, public hearing notices were not mailed to all property owners within 350 feet of the property, as required by state statute. The application is tentatively scheduled for the January 28, 1997 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION J DATE: March 4. 1997 AGENDA SECTION Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT City ClerkJ ~. ' ITEM NO.3. Declare,Biting Dog On February 19, 1997 a rottweiler owned by Leo Kimmel attacked a cat owned by Jacqueline Neville and caused such extensive injuries that the cat had to be put to sleep. The cat was on the front steps of the Neville residence and the Kimmel dog was running at large. Mrs. Neville's young daughter (the actual owner of the cat) happened to witness the attack. A "biting dog" is one which, without being provoked, has bitten, ) scratched, or caused other injury or threatens such injury to a person or another domestic animal, under circumstances where, at the time of the threat of attack, the person or domestic animal was lawfully on the premises upon which the victim was legally entitled to be..... Both parties involved in this incident have been notified of the time and place of the meeting. Attached is a resolution declaring the dog a "biting dog" if that is the determination of the City Council. Also attached are the police report and the veterinarian's report. ;' CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NO. R j A RESOLUTION DECLARING A DOG OWNED BY LEO KIMMEL, 3146 - 167TH LANE NW AS A BITING DOG. WHEREAS, a dog owned by Leo Kimmel attacked a cat owned by Jacqueline Neville; and WHEREAS, the injuries received by the cat were so extensive that the cat had to be euthanized; and WHEREAS, City Ordinance 53 permits the City Council to declare such an animal as a "biting dog". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby declares a Rottweiler dog owned by Leo Kimmel, 3146 - 167th Lane NW a "biting dog". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if another attack or threat of an attack occurs, the dog may be declared a nuisance and will be required to be destroyed or removed permanently from the city. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this ~ day of March , 19.2.2.... CITY OF ANDOVER Attest: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk ) Anoka County Sheriff's Dept. Incident: 9703g156 INcrDE~T CAS~ R~PORT Call for service Isn: In ) ill activity: cfs activity: date-tm rptd: operator Id: mi~c numbor. time received: time dispatch: timE! arrived: timo compl.ete. evidence: 1 0 C i!l ti 0 n : addr nurn 11igh: 1621 1621 1652 1702 no -No Ent..y 5000~ -Dog complaints 2/19/97 1621 how recvd: arnus disposition: Llnit tI~:!'l1d: off1 i'lssnd! off2 assnd: piltrol <11"1101: ~ ,'lll: juri.., 167 l1lne n..... P 51::117 e..00'3 I I I I I I I I I a4000 -andover hanson)co 9,161st)181 .1 -mnaa2120x - Ahdover I apt: city: andover I st: mn zip: 55304-0000 I I -No Entry -pending -Andover cso -eso StQvQn Fischer -No entry -no entry 3145 Offense isn: 01 -- None -- Person Reporting nallle: nevIlle. Jacqueline lee dab: 3/31/55 agg, 41 <ldclress: 31015 167 lane n\oJ andover mn 55304-0000 seK: f -fEPlALE I"'.acoa w -WHITE hgt Ii wgt;;; eyes: -No Entry ph. 612-753-299a emp1/parent: work ph: 612-506-2743 , ion: 1 pan: 9 a~tivity. 5aaa4 -Dog oomplainta ~uv Person Reporting None Victim None Juv Victim None Adult Arr"..tod None Juv Contact None , ) Run: 2/24/97 11:09 10."1 (contInued) page 1 si9nod: , t 1'(, #: S'(,S9 S9L~OISIAla lO~Vd Sl: II LS-t'(,-'(, ddl~S 'J'V:AS lN3S Anoka County Sheriff's Dept. Incident: 97030156 INCIDENT C~SE REPORT Person With Knowledge / nsma: forcier. kara 100 address: 3146 167 l8n8 nw sax: f -FEMALE r'clee: w -WHIT!; ~yo~. -No Entry dab. 3/1G/71 age, 2S 5ndoV9r mn 5530~-0000 I1gl: & wgt: ph; olZ-7~3-<l761 isn: 1 psn: 2 activity: 50804 -Dog complaints Owner namQ' kimmel. leD berne rd dob: 7/26/70 age: t!G address: 3146 167 lane nw andovor mn 5S304-CHUlJ sex: m -MALE roace: \oJ -WHITE hgt & \.Ig 1:: eyeut: -No entry ph: 612-753-4781 isn: I psn: 3 activity: 50004 -Dog complaints .. Vehicle 1000n, 01 None / STOLEN property ist!: 81 None EVIDENCE property r"n, e1 Non.. / Run: 2/24/97 11:09 lori (comploto) pago :2 csw-print20r05tl10951 t IS # ~ S~6g SSLrNOISIAIU lO~lVd 61:1[ L6-t6-~ d.:II}8HS 'J'V:AI! lN3S Anoka County Shertff's Dept. Incident: 97030156 tNCIDENT NARRATXVE REPORT Writer: amua ) Action Date-Time: 82/24/97 09:45:00 ..-------------- Received a dog complaint from Neville at Andover City Hall. Nevillg state~ her neighbor'. dog. a black rottw&iler, came over to her house that morning 12nd c:lt;t<lcl~tld tier C.:lt. The cat was tak;~n to the vet h06pital where it had to be put to ~lQwp bQC~UG. of $cr~OUe injurie~. Neville Bl~o st6tcd t~at the dog is always outside without a leash. r recelvod information on the dog owner and informed her that I would follow up with him. I attempted to make contact with the owner but no one home. CSO Fischel" 07.-24-97 On a2-23..97 at 16'3.;1 nours, I made oontact .....Lth Ktlro Lee forcier', 3-16-71, at 3146 167 Lane N.W. on a follow up t~ a rioa complaint. In speaking with Forcier I learned she was ~ware that ~er dog killed ehe complainant'S cat on 02-19-97. She stated that she and her boyfriend Loo Born~rd Kimmel. 7-26-7e. gavti the complainant a Check to cover the vet bills incurrod when eomplainant'c c.t ~aa put to &leep ~t the vet hospital. I Inform~d rorcler of tne 10 day quarantine law regarding dog bite situations and that raporte woro being completed and ~ent to Andover City Hall Tor their records. She was also informQd that thrao complaints will re~ult , / in a citation, as well as the Andcver Ordinance regarding the leash law. CSO Fischer 02-24-97 ---------------------------------------- , / Run: 2/24/97 11:09 lori (complete) pllge 3 n~w-print20r0S~LLe951 t It #~ G~69 99L~OISI^Ia lOMlVd 61: II L6-tG-~ .::I.:lI~S 'J"V:AH lNdS ****************************** 1 V ACC I G I 0.1 I DHPP 1_1_1 1 RAB I I I I # I CVR 1_1_1 I FELV 1_1_1 I BORD I I I I LYME I I I I_COR_I_I_I , I *10 CHIP* ~?____./~~r GIVEN I_I I CHCKD I_I 1----------- 1 I 1/~ ~~ ~j ~,,- HWO/MINI P / N / 0 EAR SMEAR DIET/OBESITY I_I PHONE: R-Y ++++ I_I TIME: R-B ++++ EAR PROGRAM I_I FEC PP / P / N / ~ L-Y ++++ HOUSEBREAKING I_I FEC SMEAR P / N / D L-B ++++ 10 CHIP I_I POS: SKIN SCRAPE DENTAL CARE I_I FELV/FIV P / N / 0 I + I - I FLEAS/TICKS I I ****************************************************************************** I LAB/X-RAY I REQUESTS: I ':7- ,6..-4. r,' k I I I I I I I I I I I /l/e vIii=- HISTORY: .tJ ~ - l$t ut7 .JOy-~~ -r~/.~/ ) **************************************** GEN APPEAR INIAl M EYES EARS , p~~ ~a~. ORAL CAV ITY I N I A I /#T,{. ,J"'" , LYMPH NODES ~IAI INIAl ,/U) ,~ , v:tj~/~~~ ~ .~ SKIN MUSCULO/ SKELETAL NERVOUS INIAl INIAl DIGESTIVE ANAL GLANDS ~IAI UROGENITAL ~IAI CT~~ULATORY INIAl d;1' He h-r- ~k ~~/~ '. / RESPIRATORY INIAI~N7 ~-; sA.;l ;' ~~ ~ 'j<",,_.-.h ****************************************************************** LAB: DISCUSSION: --------------------------------------- DX/PLA~~ -'0 ;:~~' ;: .. .. . _ .:...~. :...... A.<u'"'7 =. ~.- /,.~ ".L~"h_ . I-?are ~r,v, t7 " -. / I ,,,,VC .....7" DATE: ,..)-17- 97 APPT: If' . .;Jr- "1 ,2'/"-' (; ~'JOj I ~. NAME: h k' ARRIV: WT: MM: r.;!dlf, -07 ~ T: / /~/ P: R: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL AcrION DATE March 4, 1997 AGENDA fID SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA n.: ~~n Tto~ ITEM flDJj. Rezoning - R-l to R-4 Chesterton Commons Section 23 Ashford Development Corporation Planning ~ David L. Carlberg C mmunity Development Director BY: The City Council is asked to review and discuss the rezoning request of Ashford Development Corporation to rezone property from R-l, Single Family Rural to R- 4, Single Family Urban on the property legally described on the attached amendment to Ordinance No.8, Section 6.03, Zoning District Map. The property is to be platted and known as "Chesterton Commons". / Background For background information on the rezoning request, please consult the staff report and the minutes from the February 11, 1997, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Also attached is a letter from William G. Hawkins, City Attorney regarding the Metropolitan Land Planning Act of 1995 as it relates to the rezoning request. Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the rezoning request on February 11, 1997 and is recommending to the City Council denial of the proposed rezoning. The Commission's recommendation of denial is based on the inconsistency of the rezoning request with the Andover Comprehensive Plan. '\ , MOTION BY: SECOND BY: / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO.8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: The District Zoning Map of the City of Andover is hereby amended as shown on the attached map, showing the following rezoning: The property legally described as follows is rezoned from R-l, Single Family Rural to R-4, Single Family Urban. The Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, Except the following described parcels. ; That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Southeasterly of the centerline of County Road No. 18; and That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest Comer of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 2,3; thence east on the south line thereof to the centerline of Anoka County Road No. 18; thence northeasterly along said centerline a distance of 551.50 feet; thence northwesterly at right angles to said centerline a distance of 404.00 feet; thence southwesterly at right angles to last described line 675.26 feet, more or less, to the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence southerly on the west line thereof to the point of beginning, according to the United States Government survey thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota; and The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County. Minnesota. \ Subject to restrictions. reservations and easement of record. if any. / j / , . / Page Two Ordinance Amendment Rezoning - R-l to R-4 NOTE: All other Sections of the Zoning Ordinance shall remain as written and adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this , 1997. day of City of Andover ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk \ / \ , .I l.AW OFFICES OF William G. Hawkins and Associates } Le.l!.ul rt.BislUf/l WENDY B. DEZELAI{ 2140 FOURTH AVENUE NORTH A:--IOKA. MINNESOTA 55303 PHONE (612) 427.8877 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS BARRY A. SULLIVAN February 21, 1997 ,....,,.... (: ~ . , -. 1.' ~ \ J '....-- .... 1ft- b"i'-I~ r'l , \ =- oJ L- i "/ ;.~:.. L.: ....E"" "7 J"~-' r DC: ~}jl The Honorable Mayor McKelvey and Council Members City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 r.:..'1 (')'-' \..i fl. \..1 r ~~ ['.J ~~'; ! -'; i -' C'" c: Re: Inconsistencies Between the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan Dear Mayor McKelvey and Members of the City Council: You have asked me for an opinion regarding an issue that has arisen involving inconsistencies between the Andover City Zoning Ordinance and Andover Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the question is whether the City can rezone property to a zoning classification that is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan designation for the same property. In my opinion, the answer is no. Factua/ Background. .1 understand the relevant facts of this situation .to be as follows. The applicant/developer owns 104 or so acres along Hanson Boulevard near City Hall which is suppose to be platted as Chesterton Commons. The property is currently zoned R-1, single family rural. Sewer and water services are being extended to the area and the developer is proposing to rezone the property to R-4, single family urban. Portions of the property in question are subject to three different designations under the Andover Comprehensive Plan. The first is residential- urban, single family (RU), the second is residential-medium density (RM), and the third is open spaces-planned unit development (OS-PUD). The requested zoning amendment from R-1 to R-4 would be consistent with the RU designation under the comprehensive plan but would not be consistent with the RM and OS-PUD designations. The developer has requested that the City approve a proposed preliminary plat and rezoning without going through the process of amending the comprehensive plan. Lega/ Ana/ysis. In 1995, the legislature amended the statute that controls and regulates municipal comprehensive plans. That amendment prohibits a city from adopting any official control which is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. Further, that amendment compels the city to review its comprehensive plan and related ordinances and remove inconsistencies. A zoning amendment would be an "official control" within the meaning of that statute, Consequently, it is necessary for the city to amend its comprehensive plan prior to rezoning the property. Mayor and Council Members February 21, 1997 Page 2 It is necessary to briefly review the applicable statutes. Minnesota Statute Chapter 462 contains those statutes which authorize cities to engage in zoning and land use planning. This chapter also authorizes cities to adopt comprehensive plans. Under Chapter 462, a comprehensive plan is intended to reflect the city's recommendations for future development. It is intended as a general statement of objectives and policies and not as an official control. Minnesota Statute ~ 462.357, Subd. 2, clearly states: "If the comprehensive municipal plan is in conflict with the zoning ordinance, the zoning ordinance supersedes the plan." Minnesota Statute Chapter 473 is the set of statutes that e~t3blishes and organizes the Metropolitan Council. This chapter contains statutes regulating development in the metropolitan area. Under this chapter, municipal comprehensive plans are mandatory. Prior to the 1995 amendment, ~ 473.858, Subd. 1, contained language that was very similar to the portion from ~ 462.357 that was quoted above. ~ 473.858, Subd. 1, formerly provided: "If the comprehensive municipal plan is in conflict with the zoning ordinance, the zoning ordinance supersedes the plan." / Based upon these similar and consistent statutes, a whole body of court case law developed which stood for the proposition that a designation of land in a city comprehensive plan was advisory and did not unalterably bind the city. See, e.g., Amcon Core. v, Citv of Eaaan. 348 N.W.2d 66 (Minn. 1984); State, Citv Rochester Association v, Citv of Rochester. 268 N.W.2d 885 (Minn. 1978); A.A. Putnam and Associates v. Citv of Mendota Heiahts. 510 N.W.2d 264 (Minn.Ct.App. 1994). Under that line of cases, a decision by a city to rezone land in a manner inconsistent with its comprehensive plan would at most be viewed as some evidence that the city had acted arbitrarily. Nonetheless, the city's decision would still be presumed valid and would be upheld as long as some rational basis existed to support its decision. Putnam. suora. However, the 1995 amendment to ~ 473.858 was a complete change. That relevant section now reads as follows: "If the comprehensive municipal plan is in conflict with the zoning ordinance, the zoning ordinance shall be brought into conformance with the plan....After August 1, 1995, a local government unit shall not adopt any fiscal device or official control which is in conflict with its comprehensive plan...." / Mayor and Council Members February 21, 1997 ) Page 3 Consequently, ~ 462.357 (municipal planning) and ~ 473.858 (metropolitan government) are contradictory. The legislature has resolved that inconsistency by providing that the sections in Chapter 473 dealing with metropolitan government and comprehensive plans for cities within the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Council "shall supersede the provisions of the applicable planning statute wherever a conflict may exist." Minn. Stat. ~ 473.858, Subd. 1. As a result, the statutory provision from ~ 462.357 which provides that the zoning ordinance supersedes a municipal plan does not apply to the City of Andover. The City is bound by the provisions of ~ 473.858 which prohibits the City from adopting any official control which conflicts with its comprehensive plan. Conclusion and Recommendations. In my opinion, the City may not amend a zoning classification for land in a manner that is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan designation for the land. The City must first amend the comprehensive plan. The legislature, in its 1995 amendments, directed every municipality to undertake a review of its comprehensive plan and zoning ordinances not later than December 31, 1998 and to update and eliminate any inconsistencies. It is my understanding that there are a number of inconsistencies between the plan and the zoning ordinance. In order to avoid the issue of superiority of comprehensive plan designation over the ,/ zoning ordinance, I would recommend that the City begin an immediate effort to reconcile these inconsistencies. If you have any questions or comments regarding this opinion, please feel free to contact me. William G. Hawkins BAS:wbd cc: Mr. Richard Fursman Mr. Dave Carlberg Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 11, 1997 Page 3 ( 'PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING - R-l, SINGLE FAMILY RURAL TO R-4, SINGLE IFAMILY URBAN - SECTION 23 - ASHFORD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 7:28 p.m. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the request of Ashford Development Corporation to rezone 104.1 acres west of Hanson Boulevard and generally north of Crosstown Boulevard from R-l, Single Family Rural, to R-4, Single Family Urban. The,location is .the proposed subdivision to be known as Chesterton Commons. As of August 1, 1995, the City cannot adopt an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance which is in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan shows this area as Open Space, Residential-Medium Density, and Residential-Urban Single Family; therefore, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is needed to allow the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. The property is in the MUSA and is in the 1995-2000 development time frame. Commissioner Squires asked why they don't have a Comprehensive Plan amendment before them at the same time. Mr. Carlberg stated during the sketch plan process, the proposal was consistent with the Comprehe~sive Plan. The preliminary plat has changed from the sketch plan. This is the first rezoning since the August, 1995, law requiring an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for any rezoning that is in conflict with the land use map. First the Commission needs to decide if the proposal is indeed in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan; and if so, do they want to amend the Comprehensive Plan. That amendment can be initiated by the property owner as well. " /Commissioner Apel argued when the Comprehensive Plan was being drafted in 1991, the theory was that gravity municipal sanitary sewer was not able to service the area beyond Ditch 37. Also, the Plan was developed with the intent that it was a guide, not the rule. He questioned the legality of the law to require retroactive enforcement and noted that issue has not yet been challenged in the courts. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the anticipated uses in the Open Space zone, which does encourage PUDs with housing clustered while preserving the surrounding wildlife areas. Chairperson Peek recalled when the Comprehensive Plan was being developed, the discussion related to the development around the City Hall site as a city center with commercial and recreational development. There was also concern with housing to allow life cycle variations in the City, and the RM housing density was chosen to provide higher density apartments or townhouses for that life cycle housing. The commercial rezoning earlier this evening was consistent with the discussion when the Comprehensive Plan was developed for facilities to support the government core of the City. The RM zone was to provide a buffer between the commercial and singl~ family residential areas and to provide alter~ative housing. The RM zone is for multiple housing and this proposal is for single family density. From his perspective, whae is being proposed is not consistent with the intent of the Comp Plan. The C':>r.'!'Tlission debated whether or not the pub:::"ic hearing for the \rezoning should be continued or tabled until the public hearing for an /amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is held. Commissioner Squires seated given the law, they cannot vote on the rezoning until consideration is given to ehe Comprehensive Plan amendment. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 11, 1997 Page 4 I (Public Hearing: Rezoning, R-1 to R-4, Section 23/Ashford Development, Continued) Jerrv Windschitl. Ashford Develooment Corooration - stated this has caused a great deal of frustration. On December 2, 1996, they submitted the plan for Ch~sterton Commons. This issue should have been resolved by now, but he first received the agenda materials for the hearing this morning. Another plat in the City was submitted on October 28, 1996, and had complete approval by the City Council on December 30, 1996. Yet it is February 11 and this plat is not close to being finished. Both plats had the same engineering firm and same engineer working on them. Concerning the land use map in the Comprehensive Plan, Mr. Windschitl stated the RM zone is not an official zoning district in Andover's ordinances, with the only reference of a definition in the draft of December 1, 1991. It states that RM is intended for residential development with a gross density of six units per acre or less. He argued his plat meets the district requirements with slightly over two units per acre in density. He is not a density builder but rather is wanting to build a first-class development. ~ Mr. Windschitl stated the OS district shown in the Comprehensive Plan affects the 40 acres to the north. On that property they have set aside a substantial amount of open space; and in that zone they feel they also meet the definition of the zoning as proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. \There is no den t requirement in the definition of Open Space. He )asked Staff last" to get the City Attorney's position on whether or an amen ment 0 e Comprehensive Plan is needed. He had hoped that would be available this evening. His concern is with the amount of time it takes for the Comprehensive Plan amendment process and still being able to do the proj ect this year. Mr. Carlberg stated there is no written opinion, but he did talk with the City Attorney about this issue. The Attorney indicated a Comprehensive Plan amendment is necessary to proceed. In reply to the allegations that it is taking more time en the Chesterton Commons plat than on others, he explained a comparison was done at the request of the Council which found that all plats are treated in a similar time frame. The reason Mr. Windschitl did not get a copy of the agenda material last Friday was that his engineer did not drop off the plans for the packet until mid-afternoon on Friday, so the packets were not prepared and delivered until late Friday afternoon. Mr. Windschitl stated his point is this plat has been discussed and reviewed by Staff since December 2, and this issue should have been resolved by now. He asked if the Commission feels the Staff position is correct, again arguing the proposal of Chesterton Commons meets the definitions of the land uses shown in the Comprehensive Plan. He stated the sketch plan and proposed plat are virtually identical. They changed the street in the RM area to eliminate a variance. The area covered by the GS zone is virtually identical to the sketch plan. The townhouse~ . were taken out and replaced by single family houses because at every /meeting, Staff kept talking about all the things the City can require under a PUD development. As a developer, those uncertainties made it very di f f icul t to cost the proj ect . I f the ordinance had more Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 11, 1997 Page 5 ) (Public Hearing: Rezoning, R-1 to R-4, Section 23/Ashford Development, Continued) definition on what is required in a POD, it would simply be a matter of swapping the townhomes for what is being proposed now. If the Commission wants him to develop at a higher density, they should tell him so. Commissioner Squires asked Mr. Windschitl if he is willing to make an application for the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Mr. Windschitl stated they do not feel it is needed. It is a City issue, but it would have been extremely nice to have it raised earlier in the process. Knowing the past performance of the Metropolitan Council, it could take months and years to get approval; and there is no guarantee. At this point he would not be willing to table the rezoning application to allow time to make application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment. Mr. Carlberg stated the frustrations with the Metropolitan Council are valid, but the law has changed and there have been changes in the Met Council staffing. Mr. Windschitl again asked if the Commission wants him to develop to the higher density. At this point, there is no zoning district in Andover for RM. He would have to come in under an M-2 or M-1. Discussion continued as to how to proceed at this point. Since the developer is not willing to table the item, the 60-day rule is still applicable. MOTION by Barry, Seconded \Motion carried unanimously. ) Mr. Windschi tl asked that without a recommendation. by Gamache, to open the public hearing. 8:28 p.m. the item be passed onto the City Council Don Peterson, 1374 161st Avenue - asked what specific law the Commission was discussing and asked for clarification on what the land use designations mean in the Plan. Commissioner Wells explained the law requiring that the Zoning Ordinance cannot be changed to conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan must first be amended. Mr. Carlberg explained when the Plan was adopted, it was to be used as a guide and the ordinances were law. Since then, the law has been changed that the Plan is what the City must go by. The sketch plan of the development generally met the Comprehensive Plan land use proposals with the proposed PUD. The discrepancy arose when the preliminary plat came in without the FUD. Mr. Windschitl then stated he is trying to develop at a lesser density than what the Comprehensive Plan calls for. Richard Fursman, City Administrator, explained the Staff's position is the appropriate discussion for the zoning ~s with the Planning Commission. Possibly the question should have been brought up earlier. Staff is not supporcing higher density. It appears there is an inconsistency, and Staff is asking the Commission for direction. Ron 3eckelman, 1261 Crosstown Boulevard - asked why the people weren't ,in=orned of the proposal for higher density in that area when che Plan )was developed in 1991. Until receiving notice for this meeting, he has never received information from the City. Mr. Carlberg explained the process including a task force, public hearings, announcements, etc. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 11, 1997 Page 6 ) (Public Hearing: Rezoning, R-l to R-4, Section 23/Ashford Development, , Con tinued) Kathv Beckelman. 1261 Crosstown Boulevard - asked if there is any way to stop building stores so close to the schools. So many people have been killed on Crosstown and Hanson Boulevard. The stop signs don't mean anything, since people run,right through them. She is afraid to let her children ride their bikes on. the road, and it is only going to get worse with a shopping center. Build the stores further south away from the schools. The Commission and Staff explained the legal rights of the property owner, the ordinance regulations and her ability to voice her opinion to the Council. MOTION by Wells, Seconded by Luedtke, to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. 8:54 p.m. Commissioner Apel felt the proposal and rezoning request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In reading the definitions of the proposed land use zones in the Comprehensive Plan, other than the PUD statement, the proposal meets the definitions. Commissioner Luedtke also felt that the definitions of RM and OS are met by the proposal. For the RM district, the plan meets the definition of less than six per acre for density. The OS definition encourages PUDs with housing clusters but doesn't necessarily require them. He didn't think an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is necess~ry and would be in favor of the rezoning. ;Commissioner Squires felt the proposal and rezoning is inconsistent with / the intent of the OS to allow the City to work with the developer, perhaps under a PUD, to allow flexibility. The portion slated for RM was intended for multiple family. Only the 20-acre parcel is consistent. With three different classifications on the 104 acres proposed in the Comprehensive Plan, the developer is presenting only one particular type of land use, that being single family. In his mind that seems inconsistent. That's not to say he wouldn't support a change if it gets to that point, but it must be dealt with one step at a time. Chairperson Peek also felt the rezoning is inconsistent. Commissioner Barry stated she felt the proposal is inconsistent with three classifications in the Comp Plan and only single family use now being requested. Commissioner Wells agreed, stating she would not vote to violace the law. She read from the August 6, 1996, City Council Minutes which stated there is a possible conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, so this was brought up early in the process. Commissioner Gamache agreed with Commissioner Apel that the open space area would be consistent because clustered housing is not required, but he did feel the RM zone is inconsistent because of the intended use for multiple housing. MOTION by Squires, Seconded by Wells, to forward to the City Council the teccmmendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission that the rezoning r::::quest be denied on the grounds that it is inconsiscent with the C0mprehensive Plan, with the request that these differences try to be ,workei out, and perhaps before the City Council meeting there can be /some effort to get the Comprehensive Plan amendment in the works so thac we can deal with the problem, Motion carried on a 5-Yes, 2-No (Apel. Luedtke) vote. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 11, 1997 Page 7 '- )Public Hearing: Rezoning, R-l to R-4, Section 23/Ashford Development, Continued} Mr. Windschitl asked if he brought back a rezoning that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, would it be approved. If the single family zoning is not acceptable, he is trying to find out what he can do with his property. The Commission stated an application is needed before an answer can be given. It is not necessarily that the single family zoning is not acceptable; it is that it is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and that issue must be dealt with first. This item will be placed on the March 4, 1997, City Council agenda. 9:05 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING: PRELIMINARY PLAT - CHESTERTON COMMONS - SECTION 23 - ASHFORD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 9:05 p.m. The Commission discussed how to proceed given the recommendation to deny the rezoning request for the proposed plat. Jerrv Windschitl. Ashford Development Corporation - asked that it be processed to go with the rezoning. He was not willing to waive the 60- day time requirement. Mr. Carlberg then reviewed the request for the preliminary plat of Chesterton Commons which consists of 219 single family residential lots. :he property is curren~ly zoned R-1, Single Family Rural, and is within the MUSA. The Commission has just found the land use is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, so an amendment to that Plan is necessary to develop as proposed. Mr. Carlberg then discussed five issues regarding the plat as outlined in the agenda material -- the question of whether or not an Environmental Assessment Worksheet should be required, conformance with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan, sidewalks and trails within the plat, and the extension of the trunk watermain and sewer service to the property. The issue of a pedestrian way to connect the proposed subdivision to the trail along Hanson Boulevard has been eliminated. Mr. Carlberg also noted the comments of the Andover Review Committee on the variances being requested, the question on lot remnants and outlots and corrections to the preliminary plat as listed in the agenda material. No application was made for an area identification sign for the plat. Chairperson Peek asked if the City is comfortable that the ownership of the property sold to Cambridge Capital since the sketch plan stage is a totally separate entity from Ashford Development Corporation. Mr. Carlberg stated the City ha3 not been provided documentation that it is a separate entity. He does not know who Cambridge Capital is. MOTION by Lued~ke, Seconc.ec. by Barry, to open the public hearing. ~otion carried unanimously. 9:37 p.m. / Jerrv Windschitl. Ashford Development Corporation - believed the Staff did have some informacion on Cambridge Capital. Neither he nor his wife CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION February II, 1997 AGENDA ITEM 4. Public Hearing: Rezoning -(97-0: R-I to R-4 - Chesterton Commons Section 23 - Ashford Development DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning David L. Carlberg Community Development Director BY: APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY~ Request The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the rezoning request of Ashford Development Corporation to rezone property from R-I, Single Family Rural to R-4, Single Family Urban. The property is located west of Hanson Boulevard NW and generally north of Crosstown Boulevard NW and is legally described on the attached amendment to Ordinance No.8, the Zoning Ordinance. The property is the location of the subdivision to be known as "Chesterton Commons". Applicable Ordinances Ordinance No.8, Section 5.02, establishes the procedure for changing zoning district ',oundaries (rezoning). , Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(B), establishes the criteria for granting a Special Use Permit. These same criteria have been utilized by the City in considering rezoning applications in the past and determining the granting of a rezoning request. The criteria include: the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the occupants of surrounding land, the existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land, the effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. The Commission will need to discuss this issue as the proposed rezoning is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan. Attached is the Land Use Plan for J , Page Two ) ~ Rezoning - Chesterton Commons Ashford Development Corporation Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting February 11, 1997 Commission review. As the CommissIon may know, when a conflict exists between the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance, the Comprehensive Plan prevails. As of August 1, 1995, the City cannot adopt an official control (amendment to the Zoning Ordinance) which is in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan (see attached Chapter No. 176). Therefore, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is necessary to allow the rezoning. General Review The property to be rezoned and known as "Chesterton Commons" is located in the MUSA (Metropolitan Urban Service Area). The area to be rezoned is approximately 104.1 acres in size. , I Commission Options A. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning request of Ashford Development Corporation to rezone property from R-I, Single Family Rural to R-4, Single Family Urban, legally described on the attached amendment to Ordinance No.8, Section 6.03. B. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City Council denial of the rezoning request of Ashford Development Corporation to rezone property from R-I, Single Family Rural to R-4, Single Family Urban, legally described on the attached amendment to Ordinance No.8, Section 6.03. The Planning and Zoning Commission finds the proposal does not meet the requirements of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(B). C. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item pending further information from the applicant or Staff. . , 4-+. .; (J.l..J1j , ) ~ ~\. ~ ~:/..r CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 Property Address REZONING REQUEST FORM ISO 1l.. f H""J'..J ~I"d 1 C.Y~JJ'Tv.....,.) 11/v'J. A....dov... , ;'".1 Legal Description of Property: (Fill in whichever is,appropriateJ: Lot Block Addition PIN See .+rr~.d t...,~...l O~u:'''~/r;()-J Is the property: Abstract X information must be provide~ County) . (If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal description). or Torrens ? (This can be obtained from the -----------------------------------------------------------------. Reason for Request 70 RA :7."N~ -n........ f..... !4 ~ '7j -nJ '" to- b If J 71-.L P_t:_ ~"kr1 PIA-" 0 P s, .......d c... F.......: I '1 70 .4l1ow ;:P__ C. kes T~v 7'7;,.) Q.o.... __. N.,S " / Current Zoning ~ -I Requested Zoning R.-L/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- Name of Applicant Ash..;:;,.... d Do:. .,0:./0 1'_"-,,,.,:',/ , <2".... P,...,. ..........J , :z=,v c.. Address :?rc'fc /S .;J...vd .L4-o/'L A/ IV Business Phone ~;21- o'l..i..r Home Phone L.t17_ Q~ 1-' I 7-- I ........ I Signature (1,._/_/..1/.-.0 JJ.,._~ Date /;!I7J9&, ---_______il__~____________________________________________.______ Property Owner (Fee Owner) (If different from above) Address Home Phone Business Phone j Signature Date ----------------------------------------------------------------- REZONING PAGE 2 / The following information shall be submitted prior to review by the City of Andover: 1. A scaled drawing of the property and structures affected showing: scale and North arrow; dimensions of the property and structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures within 100 feet. 2. The names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet of the subject property . Application Fee: $200.00 \ Recording Fee Abstract property $25.00 /" Torrens property $40.00 IJ :;, ~S'. D 0 Date Paid ).. - 4- - 9 7 Receipt # 3010 Rev. 5-05-93:d' A 5-06-94:blh 9-30-96:blh Res. 179-91 (11-05-91) I " lr - --"--l:. I I OA~1 ;,1 [I HOLLOW . ~ :"_-=,:~,l - . ""'j? ;] ,,-:;::---''-C ~ e - 1-; 2. , . ( . /7 -'~-: I';!;!' .--~'~-- ~~/. -R~ 3 I~ ;';~R;;U~;'.~'2 /. - , . ~ AOOIT:'lO'(. ,;. _ # -. - -' - --=--"\ ,-' /' . I p;...,.,,; I - ~ "f' --; -."\r ') ,'" , ~ \- (J... \ I / I c...-....... j , . ""1\ tl^^/^~'~- ~ I I '\ "'\ , .... -\ '< \ Y /~ < ~ \. -t-..J (J..I f'.,.,'" ...,....\1 T ( , ~... .... ,,~ ~~ "< ( '" ""j i\\ 'wi ''''<. ... \\ ~ - .....' \ \ r .~. .2 . \ I \. -...;, _ \ ~ r . ,! . f-. -.BARN~ I BOLLING .~-c, _.J )10f1~: 1;'~;~OO- __ ,__ IH. i> -5 ~~. ! I :' . I ~ I ~ \ ~ -,. ,..~ '! BARNES ROLLING ..~, . , 7 . OAKS t? ..to::, - -- ~ : '1.J' l.J' -- '\ -' l~: r ..{ ~, \ ~') ". 'A Map .....,:. \ ',. :C'~- -- ~ T~ " '- "'- _. , i1 \ . -\ \ , ) h .I I i ').,c )\ / I II" -( ~ i '\ / \ \ _....A. ,y -:_-;.k~~... .. /I '. J Zoning i /(. ;.I ~y \ v "'\ / -c:: ~ 1;) ).., 'XC ...,~c'-\ ^ r\ ( ~~ -I J.. -< c~ ).... "i ' : h~...L. -- -,J,; ~ -i_ :: ::_-~ ; . '___ r ~... -74'-:;:~-,: r , i! " v ~ -< ~ ~ ....; 1'~1J' ~~~-:--l' .-.. i. :..-.." ~ , I , ,~, .....J " I I i __.__........J CITY HALL, 'J GR ., - ~ R-I r..\. . : \\-o{.o. ~.: ~ "'~J' -t... lC'.jl......:.l,~."..I',.,.1 ; \2r.'.~1rp~ II " "',."" r:--.-, ~ (.,sr~i-e~;.' i:'-: ;. , l.~;.: _:'-1-:'" JYII~..=-t -.. ~..: I-.~" :,~ ,."E,,"J~E...., ... ~~;:~_~~;..' .... :~:i ~:/'': : r:.<. :,~- :'~'''sc'DM' ";!. " -~~.O!I/~r~~r':~~~- -- '""" . --<-.~ "III " "- ::."~~~~. '__~' " ,,:_ ~'~_~:~~_'? J '-,I~:" " ::~!"::"'__u_ ROLLING FO~.: ! L I ;:~;~1'SS --.,.- -~-'-<=-:- .2 / f ~ -dIb- 1 ~ Ifi .' '. I. i' I ~ ~. . . - . -.. -- fii , ~~ .-.:;:',:;:J'. , , :i ~-- "';";;-n. .. ," ,. " r(~ c, \ .-\ " \ \ . I I~ ,. b-~.--= i ; I ""Po .\~~..->- --! . "'<",'0.:,,, 'So. , ~O'\\I$' . o' , : ~-~-r~~ ~:- i :' _ ; j..r i : , ~ . i I I I I~-: J-::!~ ) <2 ',/', R-4\,\ /# J~:~ . -S.,;, 0 ,..d--. --' -""... . ':'*' .-/ .', /r;::;<::/ ,'.......e,t.. .. -~. '!! ~. '8 '"~ ~ .- " a COo " .5 1: '" 8 0"01;,2 :::>~:;-e'H ,,~0..'7:;>~_ u u ~ c; c; ta .~ [[;::1':-:';:1 ~ ufl)(I)3~5flub' :.=ccu"O"O"Oe~ .0" ,,'''';;;';;;';;; 8" ~o..c..60uuuo'a o..OO<~~~U.s ;;.: "'~ ~::J~ ~o..OO<~~~U_ oj , / I- U. <( a: o ": :: <oJ " ;:> '-' <;: ;" :s 0.. <oJ VI ;:> Q ;" j ; i I I I j' ~ I I , .1. I , / I~ .~.;. . -,s:: i~ . a:: w > o o "- z o <t .. :l LL o >- l- t) ~I- I "II! ' I;, II. I: / ' ;;j,;;. I .. L"ii i ; Jijl-lt . ~ :. :." !,;;." r r::-: .-\.:'Y:::: :.;). :-:..==-. ~:.). 5;-;':' ~~e ~et==?O:t~3n ;:S~~ sc~~~~en:, ~ve=1 :~cal gove~~Qnt~l ~~i~ : / j ~ '; 5 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 , - -, :'5 :'1 18 l3 / 20 3r~1: ~a'l~ ?reparcd 1 C==p=~~en~~7e p130 ~~ ~cccrddnce ~ic~ 3ec~~=:1:; ';52.355, ,;~tw:,:,7is':'=::: ~. ~-;'3.~75r a.:-:d .l7J.8S1 ::) J73.371 a~d ~~e applic~l~ ?l~~:~~q 3~~~~~9 a~d shall h3?e ~u~~i~:ac :~e pl.1:: to ~~e c.et=~?Ol;'::1:l coucci1. ~or :-e";,,," ;:lU:~u"n-: ~" sec-:i::r:. ~7J.l7S. ~~e provt9io03 oE aec~io~ ~62.J55. 9ubdivisioo 4, ~73.17S. and 473.351 ~o 473.871 SC3~~ SUpe:3ed~ ~e provision3 of ~~e applicable pla~ni~g s~3tu~e wherever a ooaf11~ ~y exist. ~e ccopr~h.n~ive :uniclpal plan :'$ in co~~lic~ vl~~ ...;.::e so"ninq ordinance, ~ '%or.inc; ord1n.ance ~':1poe-=3"e.:~-e~e :~~~ shall be b:cuc~e L~to ~nt~~nce wieh" :~~ ~~n bv lOC2l qover~C ~nit5 in c~aiunc~ion ~i~~ :~e r~~i~. a~d. i~ necessa~v, amen~e~t of it5 c:mo=eh~nsive olan r ~i=~d unde= sec:':icn 473.954.. subCLvision 2. After '\UC'.:S: 1, 1.995,.3 local cover~ent unit sna11 no~ adact anv ~lsC31 device or o!~~cia1 COQ:~~l whic: is i~ co~~~L=t ~it~ i~ c~~eh~ngi7e ~lan,~ l~cl~di=c anv ~~~~n~9 to ~~e ~lAn, 6~ vhich ce~~S a~i7i~~ ~~ ~nflict vi~ ~~~=~=oll:~ ~ys~ea cl~as, ~ d~f~:~ bv s~:ion 413.852. 9~~i~isicn 9. ~2 c~r~ensive ol~ sha11. ~=cvide ~~tdeli~eg === -~e ~~~a and seauence of --e ac~ticn .,. .- of'official cont=ols ~o ensure cla:ned. orderly. ~d:staced" 22 develc~en= L~d ~~dev~lc~Ba~ ccnsistene ~i:~ ~e c:co~eo~~iv~ ?o: =u~~se9 0: ~~is 5ec~ton. a fiscal cev~C9 or oE~~=i3i Z~ ccc:::l snaIl ~o: :e ~=s~c~red ~~ be ~n c~nElict with a local 23 :>la:>. ~s co~er~~~n~ uni:1s c~=~hen5i~e ~14n or ~o ~r:it an a~i~~~v ~~ 15 ccn=:i=~ ~i:~ =ec=:oolita~ ~'see~ ~la~ i= ~uc~ ~i~c31 ~evie~ or J7 o~=1=i31 eon~=ol i~ ~dcot~d to ~~~r~ t=~ ~lA~~. orde~l~, a~d 28 S~qed develcccen: o~ ~:ba~l:~tioa or ~~e~elcccea: are.. 29 desianated'r~ ~~. ~rehe:siv. plan ~~~&n~ to $&Ctlon 30 473.35~. ~bdi~ision 5. Sec. 5. ~i~~8~c:a S~a~~tes 1994. .ec~ion 473.959. J: 3: 3~cdi~i~ion 1, ~~ ~ecced ~o :~ad: 33 S~bdl'Ji"io:t :. ~cc~~._s.: ~~Q =~=eh8a~~~e ;~a= ~~~ll J4 =~n~3~~ cbj.c~i7~S, ?Ol~c~ea, st4~d~rdA a~d ~=Og:42S := q~id. 35 rubl~= ~~d ;~~?Q~~ :~~~ ~2e, :~V~:~~:, :~~8vql~n~ ~n~ ~~ ;:~5.~"a:lo~ ~=: 3:: :~~cs L~d ~.:e:~ ~~:~l: :~o :~::;~~c~~o~ of , J 3 >. CITY of ANDOVER lll'r Ill' .-\.\'UU\it:.l<. ; / CUU.JT'Y OF .-\NOI0\ STATE OF \lI:-.i?\iESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARI;'IlG The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard. on Tuesday. February 11. 1997 at the Oak View Middle School. 15400 Hanson Boulevard NW. Andover. Minnesota to review the rezoning request of Ashford Development Corporation to rezone the property located on the east side of Hanson Boulevard NW and generally located north of Crosstown Boulevard NW from R-l, Single Family Rural to R-4, Single Family Urban. The property is legally described as follows: The Northwest Quaner of Section 23. Township 32. Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. Except the following described parcels. That pan of the Northwest Quaner of Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County. Minnesota, lying Southeasterly of the centerline of County Road No. 18; and , / That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 32, Range 24. Anoka County. Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest Comer of the Southeast Quaner of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 23; thence east on the south line thereof to the centerline of Anoka County Road No. 18: thence northeasterly along said centerline a distance of 551.50 feet; thence northwesterly at right angles to said centerline a distance of 404.00 feet; thence southwesterly at right angles to last described line 675.26 feet. more or less, to the west line of said Southeast Quaner of the Northwest Quarter: thence southerly on the west line thereof to the point of beginning, according to the United States Government survey thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota; and The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter ofSectiori 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to restrictions. reservations and easement of record. if any. The property is the location of the subdivision to be known as ''Chesterton Commons". All \vritten and verbal comments wiII be received at that time and location. A copy of the application and location wiII be available at the Oak View Middle School for review prior to said meeting. fr~- ( Ik..~..: . IJ' /;? " ....&.--'_.. ':.-/.;~L-" Victoria Volk. City Clerk \ ) Publication dares: January 31. 1997 & February i. 1997 PIN 143224310002 HORST DAVID E & GERALDINE M 1292 161ST AVE NW ,A' ''lOVER MN 55304 PIN: 143224310003 PETERSON DONALD H 01374 161ST AVE NW ANOKA MN 55304 PIN: 143224330001 WINDSCHITL GERALD G & CAROL A 3640 152ND LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 143224340001 LASHINSKI JAMES M & JANET L 1326 161ST AVE NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 143224430001 BOYUM LORETTA MARY 1101 161ST AVE NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 223224110001 CENTER OAKS 13736 JOHNSON ST NE HAM LAKE MN 55304 PIN: 223224140006 ANOKA HENN IND SCHOOL DIST 11 11299 HANSON BLVD NW COON RAPIDS MN 55433 PIN: 223224140007 AN HENN IND SCHOOL DIST NO 11 11299 HANSON BLVD NW COON RAPIDS MN 55433 PIN: 223224140008 AN HENN IND SCHOOL DIST NO 11 11299 HANSON BLVD NW COON RAPIDS MN 55433 PIN: 223224410001 GROW CITY OF 1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 I PII'l:233224120001 KOZLOWSKI SOPHIE 1021 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224130001 KOZLOWSKI SOPHIE 1021 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224130002 ERICKSON CURTIS G & G 0 1155 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224130003 GOSWICK EARL G 1140 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224210001 WINDSCHITL GERALD G & CAROL A 3640 152ND LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224220001 WINDSCHITL GERALD G & CAROL A 299 COON RAPIDS SO NW COON RAPIDS MN 55433 PIN: 233224230002 WINDSCHITL GERALD G & CAROL A 3640 152ND LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224230003 WINDSCHITL GERALD G & CAROL A 3640 152ND LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304 F '233224240002 . , Kwl"'lS CHESTER A & DOROTHY J 1296 CROSSTOWN SL VD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224240002 KOPIS CHESTER A & DOROTHY J 1296 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224240003 WHALSTROM BETTY J 1260 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW t. ''lOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224240004 VANHEEL GENE 1220 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 '- ~~ PIN: 233224240005 WINDSCHITL GERALD G & CAROL A 3640 152ND LANE NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224240006 BECKELMAN KATHERINE M 1261 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224310025 HOLASEK WINSLOW I 1159 ANDOVER BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224310027 RODS CONSTR INC 1357 152ND LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224310028 HOLASEK WINSLOW I 3538 MISSISSIPPI DR NW COON RAPIDS MN 55433 PIN: 233224310029 OHLAND COMPANY INC 13800 SYCAMORE ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224320002 HAMILTON LORA G 6615 HWY 10 NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224320007 WINSLOW HILLS PROPERTIES 3538 MISSISSIPPI DR NW COON RAPIDS MN 55433 / \ . j Pin: 14-~2-24~33-0002 Cambridg~ Capital, Inc. 941 HillWind Road NE, Suite 301 Minneapo)is, MN 55432 " Pin: 23-32-24-22~0001 Cambridgb Capital, Inc. 941 HiI1~ind Road NE , Suite 301 Minneapdlis, MN 55432 / ; CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION DATE March 4, 1997 AGENDA ITEM No. S. Preliminary Plat Chesterton Commons Ashford Development Corporation The City Council is requested to review and approve the preliminary plat of Chesterton Commons located in Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota as requested by Ashford Development Corporation. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Andover Review Committee General Comments , / . The proposed preliminary plat is currently zoned R-l, Single Family Rural. Rezoning ofthe property is necessary as being proposed. The proposed plat is currently within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) (1995-2000 Phase). Municipal sanitary sewer and water is proposed to serve the site. . The land use of the proposed plat is inconsistent with the Andover Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Plan. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is necessary to develop the land as being proposed. . The proposed subdivision consists of219 single family residential lots. . The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary permits (DNR, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coon Creek Watershed District, LGU regulating the Wetland Conservation Act, MPCA and any other agency which may be interested in the site.). Issues Requiring City Council Discussion and Interpretation 1, Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W). The Council will need to determine whether or not an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) is required. The attached sketch plan reviewed by the City Council on August 6, 1996 showed a much larger area to be platted (all under ownership of Ashford Development Corporation) which proposed the development of 345 lots. According / to the Environmental Quality Board, Chapter 4410.4300, Subp. 19, a mandatory ) EA W is required for residential development ifthe total number of units that may ultimately be developed on all contiguous land owned or under an option to purchase by the proposer, and is zoned for residential development or is identified for residential development by an applicable comprehensive plan, equals or exceeds a threshold as specified in this subpart. Subpart 19A.(4) applies and indicates that the City of Andover is the RGU (Responsible Governmental Unit) for the construction of residential developments of 250 unattached units. The 345 units proposed on the sketch plan exceeded the 250 unit threshold which triggers the preparation of a mandatory EA W. However, since the time the Council reviewed the sketch plan, Ashford Development Corporation sold 60 acres to Cambridge Capital, Inc. (see attached letter dated from Pete Raatikka, Hakanson Anderson). The plat submitted and being reviewed by the Council now shows the development of 219 residential units which does not exceed the threshold for a mandatory EA W. The Environmental Quality Board, Chapter 4410.4300, Subpart 1. Threshold test, states that an EA W must be prepared for projects that meet or exceed the threshold of any subparts 2 to 34. Multiple projects and multiple stages of a single project that are "connected actions" or phased actions must be considered in total when comparing the project or projects to the threshold of this part. I Chapter 4410.0200, Subp. 9b, defines connected action. Two projects are "connected actions" if a responsible governmental unit (RGU) determines they are related in any of the following ways: A, one project would directly induce the other; B. one project is a prerequisite of the other; C. neither project is justified by itself. This is further explained by the Environmental Quality Board's, "Guide to the Rules of the Minnesota Environmental Review Program". An example or scenario is given of a "connected action" which describes two independent landowners with adjoining properties jointly planning a residential project whose design is done basically without regard to the ownership boundaries. Due to this interconnected design, joint projects of this sort will likely meet conditions Band/or C cited above and hence be "connected actions" . In reviewing the issue ofthe need for an EA W the following questions should be considered: . Can the development of Chesterton Commons be considered as a part of a "connected action" as explained above? / / . Is there a "connected action" relationship between Ashford Development Corporation and Cambridge Capital, Inc.? . Does the selling or sale of 60 acres to Cambridge Capital, Inc. by Ashford Development Corporation effectively eliminate the need for an EA W? . Should an EA W still be required? The Council will need to consider these and possibly other questions in determining the need for an EA W. 2. Conformance with Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Plan. The plat is proposed to be developed for residential-urban single family development. The Land Use Plan indicates the area to be developed as OS *, open space/ planned unit development, RM, residential- medium density and RU, residential- urban single family. The plat as being proposed is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Plan. Therefore, an amendment the to Comprehensive Plan is necessary. Attached is the Land Use Plan and excerpts from the Comprehensive Plan related to the land uses. 3. Sidewalks/trails (internal and external) should be discussed (Ordinance No. 10, Section 10.12) by the Council. Discussion on trails did occur at the sketch plan level (see attached minutes). Attached please find the Andover Trail Plan. / 4. The extension of trunk watermain and sewer service to the property needs to be discussed with the Council. These utilities would be crossing private property to service this development. Easements may need to be retained from the current landowner or condemned. Comments of the Andover Review Committee The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the preliminary plat and their comments are as follows: 1. There are variances being requested with the proposed preliminary plat. The list of variances are as follows: A. The developer is requesting a variance from Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 for the following lots: 1. Lot 1, Block 1, (Phase I) requires width variance (90' required). 2. Lot 1, Block 2, (Phase I) requires depth variance (130' required). 3. Lot 2, Block 2, (Phase I) requires depth variance (130' required). 4. Lot 1, Block 1, (Phase II) requires depth variance (130' required). 5. Lot 4, Block 3, (Phase II) requires depth variance (130' required). 6. Lot 7, Block 3, (Phase II) requires depth variance (130' required). 7. Lot 8, Block 3, (Phase II) requires depth variance (130' required). J / 8. Lot 9, Block 3, (Phase II) requires depth variance (130' required). 9. Lot I, Block I, (Phase III) requires depth variance ( 130' required). Note: Those items above in bold were not listed as requested variances by the developer on the plat. B. The developer is requesting a variance to Ordinance 10, Section 9.03(G), which requires a maximum cul-de-sac length of 500 feet. The proposed length of Bluebird Street NW is 512.2 feet. C. The developer is requesting a variance to Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.05(A), which requires the maximum length of blocks shall be 1320 feet. Pedestrian ways at least ten (10') feet may be required at the approximate center of blocks over 660 feet. D. The developer is requesting a variance to Ordinance No.1 0, Section 4A, Buildable Lots/ In Areas Served by Municipal Sanitary Sewer. All lots are required to have the front 100' buildable. The following lots will require variances due to the existing wetlands: I. Lot 6, Block I (Phase III). 2. Lot 7, Block I (Phase III). E. The developer is requesting a variance to Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.03(G) which requires the construction of a temporary cul-de-sac on all new subdivisions that make provisions for the continuation of future streets for adjoining areas when the length of the street exceeds 210' from the centerline of intersecting streets. Crane Street NW in Phase II exceeds the 210' requirement by 20 feet (230 ft). 2. There are lot remnants and outlots being proposed on the plat. Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.06(1) requires lot remnants which are below the minimum lot area or dimension to be added to adjacent or surrounding lots rather than be allowed to remain as an unusable outlot or parcel. The developer indicated at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting that the remnant lots are to be conveyed/deeded to Cambridge Capital, Inc. as agreed upon by contract. The Council may wish to request a copy of that contract be submitted to the City by the applicant. 3. The Council will need to discuss Lot 26, Block 3 & Lot I, Block 4 (Phase II) as to whether these lots should be considered back to back lots. Also Lot 6, Block 3 (Phase III) will need to be discussed as well. / 4. The developer is proposing to use a geotechnical engineer to allow a separation of less than 3' for the lowest floor above the seasonal high water mark as provided in Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.06A3. The City received the report prepared by the developer's engineer on February 26, 1997. The City will submit the report to an independent geotechnical engineer at the expense ofthe developer to review and J certify that a lesser separation can be achieved as provided in Section 9.06A3. The report is pending. 5. Custom grading is being proposed on portions of the site. 6. The entrance to the plat from Hanson Boulevard NW at 154th Lane NW interferes with the Northern Natural Gas Company's (Northern) pipeline facilities and prevents Northern from having access to the pipeline for maintenance and/or repair. Northern objects to the plat and has requested the plat be revised to provide for the relocation of the street entrance at 154th Lane NW. Attached is the letter dated February 12, 1997 from Northern for Council review. 7. Due to the late receipt ofthe Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, the Engineering Department and TKDA have not had the opportunity to review the changes and make comments. Comments and recommendations will be presented at the meeting. These comments/recommendations will need to be incorporated in the resolution. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation J The Commission is recommending denial of the preliminary plat as it is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. This is also based on the fact the Commission recommended denial of the rezoning for the same reason. Attached are the minutes from the February 11, 1997 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and a resolution for Council adoption. Park and Recreation Commission Recommendation The Commission reviewed and discussed the preliminary plat at their February 20, 1997 meeting for determination of park dedication. The Commission is recommending that Lot 1, Block 6 located in Phase II and a 30' strip to the south located in Phase I be accepted as park and the remaining balance be cash in lieu of land as determined in Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07. GENERAL PRELIMINARY PLAT DATA 8.01 IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION a. Proposed name is Chesterton Commons. d. Scale is 1" = 100' J g. The preliminary plat and the grading, drainage and erosion control plan were prepared by Hakanson-Anderson Assoc., Inc. 8.02 EXISTING CONDITIONS . ) b. Total acreage is 104.01. c. The existing zoning within 300 feet of the proposed plat has been shown. f. Location of all existing telephone, gas, electric and other underground/overhead facilities are shown on preliminary plat per ordinance requirements. g. The boundary lines within 100 feet ofthe plat have been shown along with the names of the property owners. h. A Tree Protection Plan has been submitted for review and approval. j. A soil boring report has been received by the City. 8.03 DESIGN FEATURES a. The proposed right-of-way as indicated is 60 feet. . J c. The sanitary sewer, watermain, storm drains and street will be designed by the City's consultant. g. The setbacks for each lot are shown for the single family urban residential area. h. The proposed method of disposing of surface water has been shown on the grading, drainage and erosion control plan. The most recent plan will be reviewed by the Engineering Department and comments will be presented to the City Council at the meeting. 8.04 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION b. Sewage disposal facilities will be municipal sewer. d. Rezoning of properties will be required. f. Flood Plain Management is regulated by the City and the Coon Creek Watershed District (see Section 9.04(b) for additional information regarding the 100 year flood elevation). g. Street lighting is required and the installation costs will be paid for by the developer. j. The total linear road mileage for the proposed plat is 2.40 miles. ; k. Location of Area Identification Signs. An application for a Special Use Permit was not ' applied for in conjunction with preliminary plat as required. / 9.02 STREET PLAN a. The typical section, right-of-way and grade are indicated on the preliminary plat. 9.03 STREETS a. The proposed right-of-way is shown as 60 feet which conforms to standards by classification. n. Boulevard is required to be topsoil and sodded. 9.04 EASEMENTS b. A drainage easement has been shown to follow the 100 year flood elevation. 9.06 LOTS e. The developer is responsible to obtain all necessary permits from the Coon Creek Watershed District, DNR, Corps of Engineers, LOU regulating the Wetland Conservation Act, MPCA, and any other agency that may be interested in the site. j 9.07 PARKS, PLAYGROUNDS, OPEN SPACES Park dedication as recommended by the Park and Recreation Commission. , / ) CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO A RESOLUTION DENYING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CHESTERTON COMMONS BY ASHFORD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LOCATED IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Andover Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, as a result of such public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial of the plat citing the following: 1. The preliminary plat is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. This is also based on the fact that the Commission recommended denial of the rezoning request for the same reason. -' Adopted by the City Council ofthe City of Andover this 4th March , 19...2L. day of CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria V olk, City Clerk Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 11, 1997 Page 7 / (Public Hearing: Rezoning, R-1 to R-4, Section 23/Ashford Development, Continued) - oning that is consistent approved. If the single family is ing to find out what he can do with stated an application is needed before an not necessarily that the single family i is that it is inconsistent with the issu ust be dealt with first. This item 4, 1997, City Council agenda. 9:05 p.m. t::;l PUBLIC HEARING: PRELIMINARY PLAT - ~ ASHFORD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 9:05 p.m. The Commission discussed how to proceed given the recommendation to deny the rezoning request for the proposed plat. CHESTERTON COMMONS - SECTION 23 - Jerrv Windschitl. Ashford Develooment Corporation - asked that it be processed to go with the rezoning. He was not willing to waive the 60- day time requirement. Mr. Carlberg then reviewed the request for the preliminary plat of Chesterton Commons which consists of 219 single family residential lots. / The property is current.ly zoned R-1, Single Family Rural, and is within the MUSA. The Commission has just found the land use is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, so an amendment to that Plan is necessary to develop as proposed. Mr. Carlberg then discussed five issues regarding the plat as outlined in the agenda material -- the question of whether or not an Environmental Assessment Worksheet should be required, conformance with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan, sidewalks and trails within the plat, and the extension of the trunk watermain and sewer service to the property. The issue of a pedestrian way to connect the proposed subdivision to the trail along Hanson Boulevard has been eliminated. Mr. Carlberg also noted the comments of the Andover Review Committee on the variances being requested, the question on lot remnants and 'outlots and corrections to the preliminary plat as listed in the agenda material. No application was made for an area identification sign for the plat. Chairperson Peek asked if the City is comfortable that the ownership of the property sold to Cambridge Capital since the sketch plan stage is a totally separate entity from Ashford Development Corporation. Mr. Carlberg stated the City has not been provided documentation that it is a separate entity. He does not know who Cambridge Capital is. MOTION by Luedcke, Seconded by Barry, to open the public hearing. ~ Motion carried unanimously. 9:37 p.m. .I Jerrv Windschitl, Ashford Develooment Corooration - believed the Staff did have some information on Cambridge Capital. Neither he nor his wife Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 11, 1997 Page 8 ( / (Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Chesterton Commons Ashford Development, Continued) have any interest or ownership, either direct or indirect, in Cambridge Capital. Any inquires about the corporation should be directed to that company. Commissioner Squires stated Phase 3 of Chesterton Commons shows a connection of the road up through the property of Cambridge Capital. Has there been efforts to coordinate that with them? Mr. Windschitl stated the only reason that piece exists is because the ordinance requires it. That parcel will not be developed until something happens west of Hanson Boulevard. Mr. Carlberg stated Staff will continue to do research on Cambridge Capital and have that information for the City Council. He also noted that the Commission does not have to make a decision on an EAW, though they can make a recommendation to the Council. It is a Council decision. Mr. Windschitl addressed the variances, pointing out there appears to be a different interpretation of the ordinance. He was measuring the depth from the center of the lot, which then exceeds the 130 feet; but Staff is interpreting these to be variances because of the unusual shape of the lots. The variances for Lot 1, Block 4 in Phase 1, and Lot 1, Block 1 in Phase 3, is not needed. One variance is to be added, and that is for the Crane Street cul-de-sac. He didn't think it exceeded the temporary cul-de-sac length, but Staff's interpretation is that it does. " ) Typically they don't build cul-de-sacs on the short stub streets. Their review of the variance shown under Item D in the agenda, Lot 7, Block 1, Phase 3, indicates a variance is not needed. Mr. Windschitl stated the variance on the maximum length of blocks noted under Item C in the agenda material was not determined to be variances for many, many years. There are identical blocks in Hills of Bunker Lake, Hidden Creek, Woodland Terrace, Woodland Creek and North Glen. There has been a major effort in the plat to try to save trees. Some revisions this week were designed to save trees. The issue of an EAW is a source of frustration. Staff raised the EAW question some time between December 16 and 20. He answered on December 31 that an EAW was not required by statute. Generally this issue is brought to the City Council for a decision, which he felt should have been done by Staff in January to get resolved. It is frustrating to have this left until now and brought to the Planning Commission which can potentially cause another delay in the plat. Mr. Carlberg responded the EAW was mandatory from the sketch plan phase, and he explained normally that is done prior to the preliminary plat being submitted. Four months later a preliminary plat has been submitted. Staff is raising the issue of whether the selling of the 60 acres to Cambridge Capital, Inc., by Ashford Development Corporation eliminates the need for an EAW or should one still be required because the development of Chesterton Commons can be considered part of a " "connected action" where multiple projects and multipll~ stages of a I single project must be considered in total when comparing the project or projects for the threshold of mandating an EAW. Mr. Carlberg stated throughout the process the developer has been informed of the EAW process. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 11, 1997 Page 9 .J (Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Development, Continued) Chesterton Commons Ashford Mr. Windschitl argued the determination of whether or not an EAW is needed should be done in a timely fashion. This has nothing to do with the preliminary plat and is something that should be resolved by the City Council. Responding to a question on remnant lots in the plat, Mr. Windschitl stated the ordinance requires remnant parcels to be attached or conveyed to adjacent property owners. In their contract with Cambridge Capital, it states the outlots would be deeded to them. To attach them to adjacent lots would create some very unusual shaped parcels, but he would be willing to do that. He has been having conversations with the DNR to give them title to the wetland. There is some question as to whether they can convey it to the DNR; and if that cannot be done, it will deeded to one of the conservation clubs. They are making no alterations to the DNR wetland. 'The Commission noted that historically the City Council decides the issue of whether or not an EAW is required, and they agreed to forward this issue to them without comment. MOTION by Barry, Seconded by Wells, to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. 9:58 p.m. \ Mr. Haas then reviewed the comments of the Engineering Department as '- J outlined in a memorandum.. dated February 11, 1997. The housekeeping items will be reviewed with Mr. Windschitl tomorrow. Items still pending are internal sidewalks and bikeway/walkways, the outlots, the location of the park in Phases 1 and 2 which will be reviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission, and the need for the developer's geotechnical engineering report to evaluate the proposed low floor elevations. The Andover Review Committee is also recommending an 80- foot wide right-of-way to accommodate left and. right turn lanes at the intersection of 154th Lane and Hanson Boulevard and Avocet Street and Crosstown Boulevard. Other issues to discuss with Mr. Windschitl are those items listed in the February 10, 1997, letter from TKDA. The Commission asked if these items should have been resolved prior to the public hearing. Mr. Carlberg explained one of the issues the Andover Review Committee will be discussing is the completeness of these documents. While timing is an issue and Staff wants to be cooperative, the completeness of a plat before coming to the public hearing is an issue. Staff is trying to create a processing schedule on commercial site plans and plats, a table and checklist of items to be done. The ordinance does state what needs to be done, and the City could take the hard line and not go to the public hearing until everything is done; but they are trying to work with developers to keep the process going. Mr. Windschitl stated the changes on the plat were requested by the Coon , Creek Watershed Board to eliminate an impact on adj acent property. ) .~other was to eliminate a variance the City had raised. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 11, 1997 Page 10 ( - / (Public Hearing: Preliminary Development, Continued) Plat Chesterton Commons Ashford Commissioner Wells asked about the possibility of having a trail along both sides of Hanson Boulevard. Mr. Haas stated there is always that possibility, but it is a ~estion of cost. If the trail is located on the west side, the crossing would probably be at the intersection with Crosstown Boulevard, which at some point will be signaled. The area to the north of this has high buildable land. Mr. Windschitl stated a trail on the east side of Hanson Boulevard will come to an abrupt halt because of the DNR wetland. There is no possibility of getting a permit to go through it. Looking at the flow of a trail between the parks and the schools, the west side might be a better choice for the movement of pedestrians. MOTION by Squires, Seconded by Luedtke, gi ven the fact that the Commission recommended denial of the rezoning, move to recommend denial of the preliminary plat application on the grounds that it is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. If, in the event that the Comprehensive Plan were amended to allow single family housing as envisioned by the preliminary plat, in that event recommend approval with the sidewalks and. trails preserved.as noted in the February 11, 1997, memo that was handed out to us and with the variances as noted in ( the Staff report and qualified by Mr. Windschitl to the extent that he / was correct that certain variances won't be needed and one that wasn't mentioned would be needed as well.. Include comments from the two memos from the Engineering Department and TKDA. Include the developer's requirement to get all necessary permits from other agencies. Motion carried on a 5-Yes, 2-No (Apel, Peek) vote. This will be placed on the March 4, 1997, City Council agenda. 10:28 p.m. ORDINANCE REVIEW MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Gamache, to table Item 6 to the next meeting. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Luedtke, Seconded by Wells, to adj ourn. unanimously. Motion carried The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, . -\\ Cl~~(\ V:L , Mar~lla A. Peach I Recording Secretary ;"\ \ - ,~~' ~ ",,'I ~. :1/ -/0 'J ROLL/N~ FOf Zoning Map I /( 'r" >' ,) Y i~ \ " I~ r ' '" I: i.:: 1"1 ~ 1;) ~ i5:, ( - \ ~...L \ :~: f..'< r\ I (- -.) I~I t,J. -( 1~~!1 :,.t; c<;L., , .;t., ~"").~I 1 ._," , ~~.- . Ir-~ ! I II ,/;1i J::J~.t-'- ~\ , ; 'f ' . 2 " , -\ ) C,/ /~ ~ -db- ( ~ I I -1 I -_._-~ i '-::"i If Ii II -II - '--~l:! i:l. d "I 1'1 n. 'C?)- )' . ~I ~~ 'I '-'r-~ Ie . _'_ . , \\ ,.~ ',;. ~ . .~..~..r-..3 -;1 -...., ..c' '.1 PR...,c I . .- .~.. ,r . ,"'." ".,." ~ J( "'... '-';::;"- .. :) ,/ ./'/ /' I I I , CITY MALL I ~ (" ("\ \ .-\ '\ \ GR ,. . , . .. J : : . .. _ I' r Ii! " . .~r--';'-~~'_a.o:~-,~' ,....iJ'!' ------------ \'0/, I ':'l . I .'''~ ~~g: I __ ~;O~ ~'J I ~ a;fii'{::;.,I --- . - CO ~ " I I I , L, I I : !f:c L Ji{,~,~::g" _ _. ~:;;~~~ili:a:..... T :l: ~ ;; -~, ti ,..: ~ ~ C i; ~ - - ~ 0 ::i m 0 ~ 0 c. 1111111111'-- ;....:.., , f : <. I, I, I n ;'. t . "..:;., . \ ": ~... ~ . \. I .~.._, "',_r. ~ ~ ,." j ~ ~ Ll N N ,. "'" --...: ~ .... .. "'" -...,j-- ' "'" ---- ~~~~~ :=:=t=:: . - <::l ~ ~ Cl ~ <t " , ; J) o o o N I II) 0) 0) ... II) o o N . o o o N ,I '.';' ,..'\ .,;~ " ;l:~f"~ ,}.I.. '- ::",'i.1 j'. ~ ...:..... . 'j'" i h . -'I yri\ . d'~, \. I. ~.)' ~-:-''-17 .J..:__ ! ! ,.. . '.~ _".~I . _~' d._ .s.~' !-::1~'1.:;. ...'~.::... ::Zr-i... '.' . ,', ".' "'<-r 1 ~'t.. ' '/ .1. JJ . .f' 'I. ..., .,~ ',' "j.. ~ 'rJi, ~~:-..> "~ .. r.'~-..'I .~l . i ,~ -.-' '\:\~ t"j1;i I , ...J'~' ,t._J f ~; ...... , o ... o N . II) o o N fII' .' '~'l , ..... '&S' <X>. ... N ) listed in 'Hill be opolitan RGU. te aste fill municipal solid waste or refuse-derived fuel, with a capacity of 30 or more tons per day of input. E. Construction or expansion of a mixed municipal solid waste compost facility or a refuse-derived fuel production facility with a capacity of 50 or more tons per day of input. F. Expansion by at least ten percent but less than 25 percent of previous capacity of a mixed municipal solid waste disposal facility for 100,000 cubic yards or more of waste fill per year. G. For construction or expansion of a mixed municipal solid waste energy recovery facility ash landfill receiving ash from an incinerator that burns refuse-derived fuel or mixed municipal solin waste, the PCA is the RGU. Subp. 18. Sewage systems. Items A and B designate the RGU for the type of project listed: A. For expansion, modification, or replacement of a municipal or domestic sewage collection system resulting in an increase in design average daily flow of any part of that system by: (1) 500,000 gallons per day or more in a first or second class city and in any city served by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission System or the Western Lake Superior Sanitary Sewer District System; (2) 100,000 gallons per day or more in a third class city not served by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission System or the Western Lake Superior Sanitary Sewer District System; (3) 50,000 gallons per day or more in a fourth class city not served by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission System or the Western Lake Superior Sanitary Sewer District System; or (4) 50,000 gallons per day or more in an unincorporated sewered area, the PCA shall be the RGU. B. For expansion or reconstruction of an existing municipal or domestic wastewater treatment facility which results in an increase of 50 percent or more of its average wet weather design flow capacity, or construction of a new municipal or domestic wastewater treatment facility with an average wet weather design flow capacity of 50,000 gallons per day or more, the PCA shall be the RGU. ~---:7 Subp. 19. Residential development. An EAW is required for residential development if the total number of units that may ultimately be developed on all contiguous land owned or under an option to purchase by the proposer, and that is zoned for residential development or is identified for residential development by an applicable comprehensive plan, equals or exceeds a threshold of this subpart. In counting the total number of ultimate units, the RGU shall include the number of units in any plans of the proposer; for land for which the proposer has not yet prepared plans, the RGU shall use as the 1 those be ;nold ;t be the :e the RGU :ility J le air II equ ipment, for :cept tha t , which is la, subpart I, 21, or 22. lte the RGU LS waste !ssing per month, .ng or "'-'e, the , I . tha t ~ other than on of a 'Hill be e facility strict, or shall be acility for pal ic yards per pal or the :>n of mixed \ ) 53 number of u~'t3 the product uf tne numb~r GE ~crcs ~ultiplied by the maximllm ~umLe[ .:f ~r:i~~ ;~~ acr~ 2ji,-~Jabl_~ under the applicable =oning ordinance. LE t~~ t0t~1 pr<Jject req~i=e5 review but ~uture phases a:e ~~cercaln, t:~~ RGU ~ay revi~w the ultimate projec~ -;equentially in 3ccQ[danc~ ~:t!1 part ~~lO.lUI)Q, subpart 4. If a project consists of mixed unattached and attached units, an EAW m~st be prepared if the sum cE the quotient obtai~ed by dividing the numcer of unattacned units by the applicable unattached unit threshold of item A or B, plus the quotient obtained by dividing the number of attached units by the applicable attached unit threshold of item A or B. equals or exceeds one. Items A and B designate the RGU for the type of project listed. ~ A. The local governmental unit is the RGU for ~ construction of a permanent or potentially permanent residential development of: (1) 50 or more unattached or 75 or more attached units in an unsewered unincorporated area or 100 unattached units or 150 attached units in a sewered unincorporated area; (2) 100 unattached units or 150 attached units in a city that does not meet the conditions of subitem (4): (3) 100 unattached units or 150 attached units in a city meeting the conditions of subitem (4) if the project is not consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan; or ~_____:? (4) 250 unattached units or 375 attached units in a city within the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area that has adopted a comprehensive plan under Minnesota Statutes, section 473.859, or in a city not located within the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area that has filed with the EQB chair a certification that it has adopted a comprehensive plan containing the following elements: (i) a land use plan designating the existing and proposed location, intensity, and extent of use of land and water for residential, industrial, agricultural, and other public and private purposes: (ii) a transportation plan describing, designating, and scheduling the location, extent, function, and capacity of existing and proposed local public and private transportation facilities and services; (iii) a sewage collection system policy plan describing, designating, and scheduling the areas to be served by the public system, the existing and planned capacities of the public system, and the standards and conditions under which the installation of private sewage treatment systems will be permitted; (iv) a capital improvements plan for public facilities: and (v) an implementation plan describing public programs, fiscal devices, and other actions to be undertaken to d ~ c c ~ C 1 P 5 V u: r t . - t R c: t. 2. le t e ~ t_ a a. : 54 ), - - ~[,: >:C"':; .....:!..:)se l:Ttpal;:s :"'.a";e be>?!"'. .:'..:r.; i.j'~:ec: .r'. t:;,e -;en~= ic EI3. :~r~ l~.~~~J~l~e :e"/iew ~='Jposal scnt3:~ed ~~ a ~e~e=~c ~rs ~ust ::~..': c:,..,j; be 3pp=s~ed by ~~e 2QB ~~der part ~~l'J.J60C p=i~:: :~ use. Sub~. ,. Relationship to project-specific review. ?:~pd:a:~Gn ae 3 ge~e:~c S:S does ~.~c 2xempc 5pec~~ic acti~ities E=Q~ ~r0ject-specific envircGrnent31 :evie~. Projec:-spec~~ic e~~iran~ent3: review 5~a:l us~ ~~E0rmaticn in the generic EIS ~y tiering and stall reflect the recommendations ccntalned in the ge~eric S:S if the SQB determines that the generic ~IS remains adequate at the time the specific project is subject :0 revie~. Subp,~. Relationship to projects. The tact toat a ~e~ecic 2IS is being prepa,ed shall not preclude the undertaking and completion of a specific project ~hose impacts are considered in t~e generic EIS. SA: MS s 116D.0.; 116D.0.S HIST: 13 SR 1.37 ::r-,~~':; ': ..e .::-.Lr..;e :"'. do ers:3.~d ~~:) 1 ic 0: such ,i I I ented in c planning; ..;-... . \.. -'-.., the 4410.3900 JOINT FEDERAL AND STATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS. Subpart 1. Cooperative processes. Governmen~a1 units shall cooperate with federal agencies to the :ullest extent possibLe to reduce duplication bet~een Minnesota Statutes, chapte, 116u and the ~ational 2nvironmental Policy Act, United States Code 1976, title .2, sections .321 ~o .361. Subp. 2. Joint responsibility. Where a joint federal and state environmen~al document is pcepared, t~e RGU and one or mo=e Eederal agencies shall be jointly responsible :or its p=~pdraticn. ~here fede=al laws ha7e en~ironmen~al docume~t requirements in additicn to but not in conE~ic~ Ni,:h those in ~innescta 3tatut2s, section l16D.O~, gove=~~ental u~i~s 5~all cooperate in fulfilling these requirements as Nell 35 chose oE state ~a~s so t~at ~ne document can comply Nit~ a1: applicable l.a',,;s. ch ~=oject5; the ed :n a affect nti31. for 'ped. den. 'F.'I the .;e;.,_ /..... :.~;:). ,a c: 1.10. 21 rJ 0 :;.::rmat ion ;e re::1ents ,ha:: contain Subp. 3. Federal EIS as draft EIS. ~~ a federa: EIS Hill be or has been prepared fOe a project. the RGU shall utili=e the dra:,: or Einal federal EIS as the draft state EIS for the ~roject i: the :ederal EIS addresses the scoped issues and satisfies the standa,ds set fo,th in pact ..10.2300. SA: MS s 1160.0. subd 5a . results .t cf the MANDATORY CATEGORIES ~, .3.:-~d ,:he .0 pr :duce t~e ~410.~JOO MANDATORY EAW CATEGORIES. S~bpa~::. Threshold test. An SA~ must be prepa:~d tor project5 ~~a: ~eet ar exceed the :h:eshold of any Gf ~ubparts 2 to 3~, ~nless t~e ~roject meets ~r exceeds any t~re5holds of ~art ~~~O.~~GO, in ~r.ich case an srs ~us~ be ~repared. ~uiti~le projects a~d mu:t:ple stages of a single ~roject ~~at a,e~connected ac:ion~~or phased actions mus~ be considered :n ~0tal ~nen ccmparing the project or projects ~o :~e tnresho~d5 of ~ni5 part and part ~~:~.t~GQ. :C':.:.':~; :e : icn ~:1d .':~ :1..:t in a ~at:.:e ~'~. 5;:,eci::.c :acility ~sed to compos: Q~ co-compos: solid ~ast~, :ncl~di~g: M. st~uctures and processi~g eq~ipme~t ~se~ tC contro~ c=ainage or collect and trea: leachate; and B. storage areas for incoming ~aste, the f:nal product, and residuals resu~ti~g from the composti~g process. Subp. 9b. Connected act ions. T'.o'o pro ject 5 are "connected actions" if a responsible governmental unit deter~ines :hey are related in any of the fOlloNing ~ays: A. one project would directly i~duce the other; B. one project is a prerequisite for the other; or C. neither project is justified by itself. Subp. 10. Construction. "Construction" means any activity that directly alters the environment. It includes preparation of land or fabrication of facilities. It does not include surveying or mapping. Subp. 11. Cumulative impact. "Cumulative impact" means the impact on the environment that results from incremental effects of the project in addition to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects regardless of what person undertakes the other projects. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant projects taking place over a period of time. Subp. 12. Day. "Day" i~ counting any period of time shall not include the day of the event from which the designated period of time begins. The last day of the period counted s~all be included, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or a legal holiday, in wnich event the period runs until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday. When the period of time prescribed or allowed is 15 days or less,. intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays shall be excluded in the counting of days. Subp. 13. [Repealed by amendment, L 1983 c 283 s 115 5ubd Subp. = t~;E t0t2.~ a:1tici;Ja:e 0f the E:~ Subp. ::: ur..expec:e-.: cle=.= a:1:: or m:tig2.: esse!;tia~ .....'incsta[T.. Subp. : faci2..it:'j1O solid -",.:as: heat by d:. into an ie. facilities Subp. : conditions propesed ;:. flora, fa~: natural fe: significa::- Subp. 2- "Environrr.e:'" which is cc determine... to initia':c. 1 ] Subp. 2: means EAW, other envi: Subp. 2, impact sta: by Minnesc: Subp. 2~ Subp. 2, the capabl~ existi:lg c.;. net i:lcreas Subp. 2~ rr:earllng gl' Subp. ,. ;i'.'e:1 iI". ~_ Su~p. 3:" plain o~dir. flood p:a ie. Minnes':'ta S commiss:'Q:1~ ''J:: the Depa Suop. J: ':122.:-, ~ :.g ~:. Subp. 14. Disposal facility. "Disposal facility" has the meaning given in Minnesota Statutes, section 11SA.G3, subdi",ision 10. Subp. 15. DNR. "DNR" means Department of Natura: Resources. Subp. 16. OOT. "DOT" means Depa=:ment of Transpc.:-ta':ior.. Suop. 1..7. EAW. "EAW" means env~=0nrr:enta: aSSeS3r:1e::: worksheet. Subp. :8. EIS. "EIS" mea:15 envi=c~me:1tal impact stateme:1t. Subp. 13. EIS actual cost. "SIS actual cost" means ~he total of all allowable expenditures i::curred by the RGU and the proposer in preparing and distrlbuting the EIS. Subp. 20. EIS assessed cost. "EIS assessed cost" means that portion of the EIS estimated cost paid by the proposer in the ferm of a cash payment :0 the EQB or to the RGU for t~e sallection and ana:ysls of technical data incorporated ~n t~€ E::S. 4 /, ,/ j, cr [_{ Ide I r/ Ci.~ .H '-~ f{c 1!' I . ( ;' c ../-~(~.< ~\ \ ..." '.V '~, (. '1-:-,,- f-:=. v''-'' "~v,'''V''-'- -,~\ () . ,-, -;? '- ,'C-'-- .~~ ("', r ('~ l-'t.,- / Connected Actions Rcganlk.....;.\ of .,hcu..-r hy 1)..- '~lllIC ;'f\1~'\,:r. pmjL"b 1!Ill'! h: c., 'll'l.lcfL'<1 [XUl, "I ~l lll',;.:r. '1l1~k' pmj..'<:[ I(ir Pllf!X)SCs of ~mimnl1l.:nt.:d r.~..,c',' if dlc)' an: Inl<:rrdall'd ill 'IllY "I' dlc \lays (1l\:\cnlx:d in thL' ddinitim of "COIlllL'ClCtl :.r.:tions." This lCrrn '>.as 'KltlL~1 to lOC rub ill 1l)S" '~Id in part, rcph:c:; dlc 1l'n1l "r~lllixl actiulls," which was Jd:lCd The~ = ~c types of intcn:onll\.'ctilJl1S tx:l'>.ecn prujX:L> thall1lakc them '\:onn\.'Cl<:u actions: " 1. One ....ill iJulua llle oilier (ths is tile alpeCl of tile furmJ:r term "related actions" ',hich is covered by "connected oclions" ); 2. One is a prerequisite for IIIe other; or 3. Neither is juslified by itlelf Wlx:never two (or more) {XOjects are related in any of th= ways, tl-ey must be considerro as if one project, re~ess of owrership or timing, ani must be trc3ted in xcomance with pans 441O.HXXl. 441O.2OCO. 4410.4300. subpart 1 ani 4410.4-100, subpart 1. , ) One example of a "connected xtion" which may occur with somc frequency is the following. Independent Iandowrers with adjJining IJOpcrties sometimes jJintly pbn a residential cr commercial project whose design is done OOsica1ly without regard to tl-e ownership ooundaries. Because of the interconnected design, joint projects of this son will likely meet cooclitions 2 and/or 3 cited above and hence be "connected xtions." It is not intended that the coocept of "connected actions" be interpreted to require th;a emirorunental review of public infraslructur:ll projects (e.g., a highway or sewer) fully sari3fy all review requirements that may apply to specific fu1ure developments that would be served by the infulsou:tur:ll project, unless the infrastructure is planned primarily to serve a specific project rather than to sUPJ:On developnent generally. (However, this 00es not relieve the RGU of its ~llSlbility to cmsi<kr induced development in a generic way in its enviraunemal review of tl-e infrastructure project) Joint Review of Independent Projects Trere are siwations in which independem projects - i.e., projects which are neitl-er "phased actions" nor "connected xtions" - may be test considered jJintly for pUlJXl5es of environmental review. Decisions about joint review of truly in~ndent projects are at the d&retion of the RGU. with the general provisos that jJint review may not unduly delay the review of one project compared to the estimared time for review on its OW11 and that an RGU always has an obligatioo to consider cwnulative irnpxts from other projects in determining the need for an ElS on any given project (see part 4410.1700, subpan 7, item B). Joint review may be appropriate in the following circwnstances: 1. Each of a group if projeclS planned for lhe same vicinity requires prepararion of an E4W and the RGV believes lhat review could be completed mtJre efficieruly, or polential cumulalive impaclS could be assessed mtJre effectively. by prepararion of a joint E4lV. 2. Each of a group if prOjeclS requires an ElS and the RGV believes lhatlhey will have potential cumulative impacts on the same area and lhat review could be accomplished mtJre effectively or efficiently by a joinl ElS, An ElS which jointly reviews independent projeClS which cumulatively affeCllhe scure geographic area has hislOrically been referred 10 as a "related aClions ElS." This 111111 , 9 / .111 Hakanson Anderson 1 Assoc..lnc. 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, Minnesota 55303 612/427.5860 Fax 612!427.J~Ur 0520 , December 2, 1996 / Mr. Dave Carlberg Community Development Director City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard Andover, MN 55304 RE: Chesterton Commons Preliminary Plat Dear Mr. Carlberg: Please accept this letter as our formal submittal of the preliminary plat of Chesterton Commons. Enclosed with this letter are six full scale copies of the preliminary plat and three full scale copies of the grading and erosion control plan, utility plan and tree protection plan. Also, enclosed is a hydrology report, soils report and a wetland delineation report and addendum. {Since the review of the sketch plan, the adjacent 60 acres to the northwest of the plat have @ / ~een acquired by Cambridge Capital, Inc. Therefore, the total number of lots in the plat is 219 _lots. ) Please review this preliminary plat as soon as possible and place it on an upcoming Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda. Also, please acknowledge receipt of the plat and attachments by signing this letter. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~~~ Peter R. Raatikka, PE kas Enclosure cc: Jerry Windschitl , Ashford Development, Inc. 2054.16.c I acknowledge receipt of the preliminary plat of Chesterton Commons and items listed in this > letter on December 2, 1996. Dave Carlberg Engil1t'Pl"s Landscape Architects SurVt'yors ~. ~,.. .-.6, ~I j' ~P\ .:, fA --. .. ). , _<:;:1 . t) lA:~ j --'-- '. ~'Ij:)! 1iTi'd ~ II, ~~ !L.!.:;.,c.. _ ,.' I I:' I ' "J I ..-IT-1, I" I i'loll r'n ' ' r,... ' 1 ="i-,,-_ ,\ I:~ ~ ~ ='--. .l~ ~; ~r, '.11 r?! : I! 1,',11 t ; n~".' ';'h' ti:f .."",' , "I'~;l'G' ; : '~Il' ~-./ - I-':Jl'! ,'1.: '.1-':&..,. "~..TI ':T 1J- I ,,-. . ~~_~.J.'::!1::l I ,. rt.1 r~ ("'1',,"1'111: I, : <=': _~t-.:. _ IDJWk'fiL~ ~ "It ~ : It ~.' , ail;i. i. ' r-! I~~' r - ~ : 'i ,[. ::1. . ~I"I1'i -~! ~ .1 I ~ : \o!tJ }" :n I .' iJ' . . '-.- ell ' .AL ,~:\ - _ t- c: - _ _' 4=l1.r~~ I-I!"\~ f ( : I ~~..~ ~.~: ~ ~ :! :~};~~il'YL" i i J"":'l.Jit:.;;-~'l/rlif' 1'1T--rp:.'t1llf~~ft [~T;.~\'r;r:n~~. ! (~~J\ ,-1-', . -'en . [ . rnrWV' -- ,.1111 lI:.\,f:l . ,;_.. 1 - ~: !lI~..'. ,I~' ,~::t~l' ~'"'; . ~Ur - 1_: ~~l, ffil~\!) ~\; 1:.) ~;F [~!_ :, _.. :;'~}I,,'I~ 't~1B.~~11'FUll:6~~ ~ il J '. ; njt~1 'll -~-, _m nn'l-'lr' ;., I' ~11~lci! ,',1,1)1'1 I " Iltnl~1~~~ j-,. ~:. \ i ''1 --( roo 6;:i6: ~~~~,~5l>~':1--'- ~ki~ ;,1J " ~- PI'" _.~ ~~I~q ~'I'I ~-' : Jt l'II~~fV~~~'ll ,I:", ' ~'~~~"lc'7 'PI!I.J-I,,~~--_uL:l.-__1:-~11Iltl- .~~I l ~~!; l~n~~,}tA'~~ II,J l \ ,L:::t r ~~ / <i~ I 7~it: ~ J~l;! ;;: ,., I~j jh:~-111' 1 I "'-I '-i-7\i;- -- __u + --' , :Tilt. ~ \ 1l~' l j ~ ['"... d..,~~~;;{:,,~~~!~ I .- I !' J I \/I~Z:. .11 II ~l~ '0'1 il;-' ',~:~~: !'~~~llf;{~{.~l':~:; 1 ,"I: f-, ~-If.'-~i \,~'~;{! l~:I-lr ;~/r'h}t~,!,U 01''''''' ~, '~\I' '" t--~ - -..... I I I ~., m+ 'J ~ . ..'(..: .- ~~~..lt ~. _ - il. ~_ ,__:D _' VI -'7-' _ ':c--r\- ,_ "1 ;. ~~'~\\Il i :U1J.~ ; ',,:y)' I' tI q 1;(, v.l" _ c: - il~'r / ,it --' -- i:f. ~,...;s - I'J ': I l' '~UL ij I 'Jr, - ___ ....;._ 2rr":.,/(..,0 ... \ '\-.11: jlL) ! i (~~. ,{.r;j 'jH: g. IL /Il~{ r.r J-l' Ii - -: ,.' (' : .. ~lh . - 0 --' :titt1. 1'\/ u '-... - ~,~L.:.-', I . j~f,!I~. ~I"I' n. "'I/JI,': '1"1 ~<15-.. _.. /' . nn -- 1""''''':' .... . 'i . '7: : -~" r- ,iIl'I, I, ,1.. I '-~,: I t;~" :':!'. _~. ,c. :;;-'C!.=17j .' "'!\n~ 'IL~:trt:' "r= c~--.l . . i. ~I~'<;;lf.' "J"~~ c ~ n )!:~: I"J~-." ... ", \ I I :u !m~ . 4_ ___ ~ L"': .L,__ I I //I I 1 I' 11. L .....:a ~, - . I I E l'~,-: II j Lm"! h J-?(-. ~~' ,'. ~-"r! -"-{~ ,.' no ~ ,. 7h. '1--' .~~~' IIlN I' \ 11 I 1 . ~" ,'J f!:' ft. ~ ". - I'" Willi I .,...,.,.,---- 'I !, :\1 j '". , - . nn or--.r Yj.. nn . ~ .."" ';,f,' ?il.';".lll I IIII :, , ,: ~f~'-J .11 LL ' r ,,' ,--'q , III{ >< , --- '. -.,..- II rr - ., " '. - : .."v,',.1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " I "1"1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I : : : : : : ~ : ~ wmj 11'1'[; U'J1l1 f !'!'ui !'. " II " \ ) I I'U'U .. I f /., ~ I t ! i Ill. ~ 1/ , J , , ; () -I -< o "TJ'" ,. ... l>o Z ... o o < fTI :u [ I . I . . -n~~!:l>~Sl"'~ ~ ~ [gi;'i;'i;'>O-a'ci' ~ ~ Ii: 13 ~.~, ~.~,] n ~ ~"', r+a~~fi'g::l=o' <; -<n==::Jrl~cn "'d~'" a.~.c.a.E; ~11 E.~~p;'n ~ R ~ ~~1?::!'o:a 0 c..a'..,nc :n ,J' !P~. 1l tl )> El '" :! 2J 5' n ;;'ra .. ~.~ ~ q~. ~ -< DRAFf - 12/1/91 are extended, land may be developed into urban lot sizes in accordance with zoning ordinances. (j) 3. Urban Residential-Multiple Family The Urban Residential-Multiple Family land use is defined as land within the MUSA and FUSA that is designated for medium density residential development. Residential development in these areas is intended for a gross density of six units per acre or less. There are four areas within the city designated as Urban Residential-Multiple Family (Figure V-A). Of these areas, one thirty acre site located at Bunker Lake and Crosstown Boulevards is nearly fully developed. The other three sites are: 30 acres near County Roads 7 and 116, 40 acres a quarter mile north of Hanson and Crosstown Boulevards, and approximately 20 acres southeast of Hanson and Crosstown Boulevards. The three undeveloped sites (90 acres) could accommodate approximately 540 units. This would yield approximately 1,240 additional people (based on a County average of 2.3 people per rental unit. 4. Housing and Residential Land Use Policies The City of Andover recognizes the following policies related to housing and residential land use. a. Disparities between supply and demand for housing, including low and moderate income housing, shall be recognized and dealt with in an appropriate manner. b. The City encourages the development of a variety of housing types within the community, including multi-family and life-cycle opportunities. .' V-20 " " ~ (\.... ~t.' .,~ .... ~ , :J: . 1- ~. } / @ \ .J DRAFT - 12/1/91 e. Open Space The City of Andover currently has many large parcels of land in addition to existing municipal park land that should be preserved as open space. These areas are scattered throughout the city and appear on the 1991 Land Use Plan as agricultural Preserve (A) or Open Space. The nature of this land is such that it should not be developed into an intensive urban use. It is the objective of this plan to preserve, protect, and enhance the open space character of all Agricultural Preserve and Open Space Land within the City. The plan designates seven open space areas within the city, each having a specified future function. These include: 1. Ward Lake and surrounding land of approximately 115 acres is designated for use as a natural preserve with appropriate passive recreational opportunities. 2. Kelsey Park is approximately 99 acres of land currently being developed as an active/passive recreational area. ,., ". Two parcels in the vicinity of City Hall, approximately 80 acres, are designated for future development as a community park for active recreational use. 4. A 160-acre site along the east side of Hanson Boulevard and northeast of City Hall is set aside for future development. The intent is to encourage a planned unit development with housing clustered in the developable areas while utilizing the remaining areas for parks, trails, public recreational development, and/or wildlife areas. 5. The old city land fill, approximately 134 acres, located along the west side of Hanson Boulevard imd south of Coon Creek, is designated to be unused for an indefinite time period due to potential adverse effects associated with hazardous waste deposits. 6. Bunker Hills Park is approximately 700 acres of land located in the southeast corner of the city. This land is currently used and will continue to be used as a regional park. 7. All areas identified on the City's zoning map as general flood plain and floodway for recreational purp'oses. VIII-18 ---..,~-- . I / @ DRAFT - 12/1/91 b. Open Spaces (OS). Areas designated for open space include existing major park facilities and lands set aside for future recreational purposes. (OS. indicates intention to incorporate open space with a Planned Unit Development.) c. Agricultural Preserve (A). Agricultural preserve lands allow agricultural and horticultural uses, and single-family residential use with a minimum lot size of 10 acres. d. Residential-Rural (RR). These lands are defined as lands outside the newly designated Metropolitan Urban Service Area and Future Urban Service Area. This land is designated for large lot development (2V2 acre lots or larger). Developers are advised to subdivide land in this area for potential future subdivision. A "ghost platting" technique is appropriate whereby land can be further subdivided in a cost efficient manner. e. Residential-Urban Single Family (RD). These areas are designated for future urban expansion. The phased development of these lands is guided by the extension of municipal services as provided in the Utilities Plan. The plan requires further restriction on the subdivision of land within this district until such time that sanitary sewer can be extended in a cost efficient manner. As sanitary sewer services are extended, land may be subdivided into urban lot sizes in accordance with zoning ordinances and subdivision regulations. f. Residential-Medium Density (RM). These lands are designated for development into multi-family residential housing. These areas are incorporated into the Plan to provide for density trade-off of development in the vicinity of City Hall as a planned unit development. Residential development in this area is limited to a gross density of six units per acre. g. Commercial (C). These areas are designated for commercial development in accordance with the City's zoning ordinance. h. Industrial (1). These areas are designated for industrial development in accordance with the City's zoning ordinances. .' XI-3 """I mllU Willi (") ! """/ -l . ,. , II ''"'ii~. I II -< ." \ "''''I 0 ! " -.: I ,. " 1'lJSJ l> 0 Z ... I .1', 0 I 0 1_ ~L. < -4'- rrI I :0 [] ,I " I i " n ~ e :=l ~ C'l Oe! ~ ao!l "d s:! U' ~ OJ 8- r!l ~ :!l l I. ~ ~ Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - July 23, 1996 Page 7 ) (Sketch Plan - Round Lake Site - Section 29, continued) remain undisturbed, The outlot to the south will not be allowed to be developed because of the new state law that tax forfeit properties cannot be used other than for open space areas. The Commission had a concern with the flood plain and traffic on Round Lake Boulevard. Mr. Haas stated the flood boundary is defined at 869, but the engineers will double check the contours when the preliminary plat is done. The traffic volume is high on Round Lake Boulevard, but someone's house would have to be removed to make a full intersection with South Coon Creek Drive. Again, the county will review the proposal, but they do not comment on the capacity of the roads. Commissioner Barry had a concern that a traffic study is not done when these developments are presented. Commissioner Wells had general concerns with the high traffic count on Round Lake Boulevard and with the jog at South Coon Creek Drive. Also, there are a lot of children riding bikes on the side of that road. How does this tie into the trail system? She was also concerned with the water level on the lake. Mr. Haas stated the Park Commission will be setting up the guidelines for trails and recommending a master trails plan. There is a potential for a separate bike lane through the area, plus there is the potential that Round Lake Boulevard will some day be widened to four lanes. They will be following up on the water levels during the preliminary plat stage. There were no further comments from the Commission. I SKETCH PLAN CHESTERTON COMMONS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC. SECTIONS 14 AND 23 ASHFORD Mr. Carlberg reviewed the proposed sketch plan of Chesterton Commons, a Planned Unit Development which consists of 345 units. It is currently zoned R-1, Single Family Rural; and is proposed to be rezoned to R-4, Single Family Urban. The property is located within the new MUSA area. Single family homes, townhomes and a commercial area are being proposed. The Comprehensive Plan proposes the area for senior housing and open space, potentially a golf course. The developer is looking at developing 45 acres in 1997 as the first phase. An environmental Assessment Worksheet will be required to be done by State Statute. The Andover Review Committee has requested the developer provide a sketch of possible development of adjacent properties. He understood Mr. Windschitl has done that, though the Committee has not had an opportunity to review it. The ARC is also recommending a second access be provided to the townhome area and that there be no ponding along Hanson Boulevard. Sewer and water does not abut the property but are located a few feet to the south. The Committee is also recommending the outlot be eliminated, plus trailways need to be discussed. Commissioner Wells wondered if the school district has looked at this. \ She was on the boundary committee for the new middle school, and they ; had no idea these 300+ lots were being proposed a Had they known, they may have made different recommendations. Mr. Carlberg did not believe the school district has reviewed this, though the City has kept the Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - July 23, 1996 Page 8 \ ) (Sketch Plan - Chesterton Commons - Sections 14 and 23, Continuec) school district informed of its proposed and potential growth over the last few years. He also reviewed the proposal of the Comprehensi'le Plan Task Force in 1991 to designate this area for recreational development, though the actual designation of a golf course was removed from the Plan. Jerry Windschitl, Ashford Development Corporation, stated the golf course was removed as a result of a joint meeting of the Task Force and the City Council. In referencing the ARC's proposal to eliminate the outlot, he explained the outlot exists for the wetland. They are proposing no alteration to the wetland. It is proposed as an outlot because the LGU doesn't want them to have radial lines from the lots carried back to the wetlands. If the lot lines are carried back through the wetlands, the people feel they own the wetland and have a right to go into them. The Watershed Board does not want that to happen, so the City and the Watershed will have to discuss what they want him to d~ with this issue. If the City's only concern with the outlot is maintenance, he would propose looking at some donation of that land to a conservatory or the DNR once all easements are satisfied for the City. He felt the ownership of the outlot could be resolved without extending the lot lines back into the wetlands. / Mr. Windschitl stated the plat was designed to contain no variances. Many of the lots are larger. The traffic patterns have been planned to prevent the problems occurring in Woodland Terrace. The Hamilton property to the south is planned for commercial development. There will be quite a bit of ponding required for the plat, and he felt ponding along Hanson Boulevard will be unavoidable to satisfy the Watershed Board. He felt the ponds could be landscaped. It would be possible to provide another access to the townhome area by going to the north, but for aesthetics and the view of the townhomes, it would be preferable not to add that road. He asked if the Commission felt it is necessary to provide another access. Mr. Windschitl also reviewed a draft proposal for the subdivision of the adjacent properties to the east and north. The property to the east is not included in the MUSA area recently received by the City; however, he felt may be able to be served with sewer in the future. He asked if th~ Commission wanted him to show that as an urban or rural subdivision. After some discussion, the Commission felt that if the Engineers determine that area can indeed by served by utilities, that it should be shown as an urban subdivision. If not, then the proposed subdivision should be to the rural standards. Mr. Windschitl noted the 40 above this property has been divided in a number of lots. He has a purchase agreement to purchase the parcel to the north, and there will be a lot split coming in. He will be trying to clean up some of the parcels, possibly blending the northern parcel with , the plat so a remnant is not left. There is wetland to the east on the / bottom portion of the plat, plus the property that is in the 1991 MUSA designation for smaller lot resubdivision. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - July 23, 1996 Page 9 "- j (Sketch Plan - Chesterton Commons - Sections 14 and 23, Continued) In further discussion with the Commission, Mr. Windschitl explained the townhomes, done by association, are not being designed for senior housing; but the intent of the market is for the empty nesters such as seniors. Off-street parking will be provided in that area. The location is the nicest part of the plat. He anticipated tying th2 park and the common area together with a trail system, though he did not know if they would be successful because of the DNR wetland. There is an existing old farm road and crossing. He also felt the park area should not compete with the activities around City Hall, envisioning there be more picnic, volleyball, horseshoe, etc., activities. The bulk of the park is high and dry with trees all the way around. The plat accesses two major county roads, and the exists on Hanson Boulevard match the driveways of the middle school. The Commissioners liked the idea of doing something with the remnant parcel to the north. They also liked the central park idea and placing activities in the park that do not compete with the City Hall parks. The Commission did not see a benefit to providing another road to the north from the townhome area. The reason people like the development ad proposed with only one access is for privacy and security reasons. / The Commission also felt it would be nice to incorporate some kind of trail system through the development to accommodate pedestrian traffic flow, but nothing specific was discussed. They felt an overall master trails plan needs to be developed so these trails would tie into an overall system. They encouraged the Park and Recreation Commission to consider a system through this plat. Mr. Windschitl noted people do not like to have trails through their back yards, so it becomes difficult to get a trail through a development. There will be some trails in the common area. He also explained the reason Andover does not have a trail system is that 12 to 15 years ago a Task Force decided not to have one. There was some concern with having a commercial district across from a middle school, noting the problems that can be created with convenience stores near schools. The preference of the Commission was to see an area with more restrictions such as the Light Business zoning with office or medical/dental buildings. They suggested the school district be asked to comment on the location of the proposed commercial area. They noted a commercial zone is inconsistent with the future land use map in the Comprehensive Plan. They did not see the need to review the sketch plan again after the Andover Review Committee has looked at th~ sketches for the development of adjacent property. The item is to be forwarded to the City Council. OTHER BUSINESS \ Mr. Carlberg updated the Commission on the actions taken by the City , / Council at its July 2, 1996, meeting. There was also a discussion on protocol, the airing of concerns, the treatment of residents by Staff and the Commission, and appropriate actions as Commissioners. Park Commission Minutes - August 1, 1996 Page 2 \ j Chesterton Commons Sketch Plan Jerry Windschitl, Ashford Development Corporation explained that the plat is 182 acres with a substantial amount of wetlands. They would be agreeable to an entire cash contribution in lieu of park land as across Hanson Boulevard are about 3/4 miles of park. There is, however, a 6 acre parcel that they would consider for park. The parcel is surrounded by trees. Todd Haas noted that based on the Comprehensive Plan, a park could fit in this area. The people in Winslow Hills have expressed concern that they do not have a park in their area. He asked the Commission to seriously consider developing a park in this plat. He then discussed a trail system with a central park location. The Park Commission discussed the trail system and open space and encouraged the City Council to look at that as part of the P.U.D. After some discussion, the Commission suggested a park be located in the southern portion of the plat with a trail system. The park should be no more than a one half acre parcel. Staff was directed to work with the developer to select the appropriate site. , J Sunshine Park Water Usage Discussion MOTION by Kieffer, seconded by Anderson to request the City Council to order a feasibility report which will identify the costs for a well to be installed at Sunshine Park. Motion carried unanimously. Commissioner O'Toole questioned whether the fire stations are billed for city water. Mr. Haas will check into this item. Commissioner Blackstad noted that there are people golfing in the City Hall Park Complex while tournaments are going on and he didn't feel that this was very safe, Mr, Haas will mention this to the Sheriff's Department so they can tell people that golfing is not permissible. Commissioner O'Toole requested the numbers for the concession stand at Sunshine Park. MOTION by Kieffer, seconded by Anderson to adjourn. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. \ i' / Respectfully submitted, I ~ /V!L-/ Victoria Volk Acting Recording Secretary " ) / J / /1'''- " , ~ jr .J ',Ill I'. ,I, 'jI 'II ;1' I Jr' ..1 'I iii {. " r.Jk'.::.- . .~, ,,=_-,-dJ} I : y' "( ," .1 ~,J)/E) ,J')" \ '--'"' . ;.--r" "'-.... .' ,.~ " a'oJ : I _.I'\.,~ . . ~!i '\ , --~l~~:l ~ - ~ ~ . .:;" ~. 2i~ : .~.: ~: It: Iil."" ~_n~-;n ---~;--~ It ~~ ! i<-ir r"ir 1 e . . . (!i r'i i! [If rr . I f j il f .J JI i f .r d f dn f nuf II r II Ii If r Iff ~I l~ h .".~ Utllll r ~ ! . a>> 0 '11f ;1;1 ~I ~ " , un r , i n . lilt l~ 1 I J ~ II f !hl J! [ E ;1 ;= . I~ I I J ~ I ~ r . I \ , / "I~:7 II, II :Ij[p'= !It~~i d · S r old . '~ . ~ I . I j ~ X Ii )(~ ~ > U) ::I:l "%j o ~ t:l t:l t<:l1 <-a- t<:l "' 8 1 '1:l is:: t<:l Z ~ ...... Z (,"') (11 ~ e.. Q:j U'J. ~ Q:j ~ ~ o 2: (1 o ~ ~ o 2: U'J. C/) ?i" (\) <-+- (") ~ ~ ~ ~ Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - August 6, 1996 Page 3 I (Anoka County Sheriff Monthly Report, Continued) vicinity to resolve a dirt bike problem they were having, Councilmember Dehn praised the Department for their quick response to a call they made. Mr. Fursman asked if the Sheriff's Department would be willing to work wi th the City and the Sno Dragons Snowmobile Club on establishing a program to resolve the snowmobile problems in the City. Mr. Christ stated they would be happy to do so. ANNUAL FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT Fire Chief Dan Winkel summarized the 1995 Andover Fire Department report, dedicating it to the fire fighters and their families. He highlighted the mission statement, organizational chart, responses, calls in 1995, year-to-year comparison of calls, calls by day a~d by station, estimated cost per capita, duties performed by the Fire Marshal, fire protection activities, 1996 and 1997 goals and objectives for fire protection, training, and a 20-year apparatus replacement plan. The number of calls in 1995 increased by about 11 percent from 1994, and he expects that to increase by another 11 to 12 percent in 1996. , \ / SKETCH PLAN/CHESTERON COMMONS " ) Jerry Windschitl, Ashford Development Corporation, Inc., presented the sketch plan to the Council. He noted several corrections to be made to the Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of July 23: Page 7, sixth line, that the Comprehensive Plan makes no reference to a senior housing or potential golf course for this area. Page 8, second paragraph, 5th line, "...proposing no alteration to the DNR wetland." (add DNR). He explained the sketch plan is designed with no known variances with th" possible exception of one cul-de-sac which is borderline in length. They spent considerable time with the street and traffic flow because of the commercial area to the south and the two county roads on either side to avoid the cut-through traffic problems being encountered in Woodland Terrace. The exists onto Hanson Boulevard exactly match those of the Oak View Middle School to the west. The Park and Recreation Commjssion has requested a one-half acre park in the southern area that is wooded or partially wooded and to be able to get a trail between the two streets. He felt that request is workable. There was also some discussion by the Park Board for trails. He noted they are not asking for a 20-percent increase in density. Many of the single family lots are over Andover's minimum requirements. The townhome area is being designed and will be marketed for the empty nesters. They are not intending to market it as senior housing. At the present time, he did not think it would qualify for lower-income affordable housing, They are showing five acres of commercial land. Their main thrust is to create a place in Andover for office buildings. They do not intend to compete with the large commercial area to the south. Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - August 6, 1996 Page 4 ) (Sketch Plan/Chesterton Commons, Continued) Mr. Windschitl noted the MSA designation through this area; but after looking at the traffic flow and the design, they feel there is no need for an MSA road through the project. They are trying to force traffic to Crosstown and Hanson Boulevards, not through the residential area. Staff as suggested there be no ponding along Hanson Boulevard. He felt it is almost impossible not to pond along Hanson. If aesthetics is a problem, he would look at presenting a landscaping plan to make them more attractive. The county has said there is enough existing easement to expand Hanson Boulevard to four lanes without disrupting any of the ponding or homes. He also noted he is in the process of purchasing several of the parcels to the north with the intent of combining at least the little remnant parcel to this plat in some fashion. Councilmember Knight stated commercial areas across from a middle school can be attractive to students, which could create a bad situation given the traffic on Hanson Boulevard. He asked if water would be added to the DNR wetland. Mr. Windschitl stated they would comply with the very strict requirements of the LGU because of the potential downstream affect on farms. The size of the ponds in the project will be very large. Also, he did not want to create a problem for the school and students in the commercial area. '\ / Councilmember Dehn felt the trails are necessary, should connect to a trail system within the community itself and should be installed prior to the lots being sold so the residents know where they are before moving in. Mayor McKelvey was told by the school district that they would bus everyone and not have students walk to the middle school because they do not want them crossing Hanson Boulevard. Councilmember Dehn also had a concern with an increase in the water table, not wanting to increase the flow down stream. People should also be made aware of possible standing water before they buy lots. There are many large trees in the area, and she wanted them preserved if possible. She liked the idea of landscaping around the ponds and developing open spaces. Mr. Windschitl stated they have divorced the ponding area from the lower areas so there isn't a mix between them. He also noted the Staff has asked that the lot lines be extended to the wetlands to avoid an outlot. The LUG does not want them to do that under the theory that if people own the wetlands, they will go into them. He stated once the City's easements are satisfied, he would look at ways to satisfy the City's concern with liability of an outlot by asking the DNR to take possession of the wetlands or possibly donate them to a conservancy. They are organizations that accept wetlands so the City does not have to own the outlot or accept the liability for it. The Council asked that he research that option further. '\ / Discussion was on the potential subdivision of adjacent properties. Councilmember Dehn was concerned with the long road to the east on the northern portion of the project, as it does not seem to go anywhere. Mr. Windschitl stated he has a purchase agreement on parcels to the north, but they are not in the MUSA. No entrances are proposed to the southern commercial area to avoid through traffic in the residential area. Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - August 6, 1996 Page 5 , / (Sketch Plan/Chesterton Commons, Continued) Mr. Carlberg then reviewed the Staff report on the proposed sketch plan of 301 single family lots, 22 twin homes and one commercial area. A discussion of the task force for the City's Comprehensive Plan was the potential golf course with senior housing in this area; however, that was removed from the final draft of the plan. The Comprehensive Plan does call for a portion of the area as open spaces and a portion as multiple housing. An EAW will have to be done for the proj ect. The Review Committee is recommending a secondary access to the townhome area; however, the Planning Commission did not feel one was warranted. The Review Committee also recommended the outlot be eliminated, that a trails system be discussed, and that the developer show potential development of adjacent properties. , Mr. Erickson explained two options to providing sanitary sewer and water to the project. One would be to run lines from their current location directly to the edge of the proposed plat, which would require obtaining easement from one or two property owners. The other option would be to extend the trunk lines northward along Crosstown Boulevard and enter the project at the street connecting the plat. Several private residents adjacent to the extension would be affected and easements would have to be purchased. After discussing the options, the Council asked that the developer and Staff attempt to negotiate the necessary easements to run the trunk lines the shortest distance to the plat. It was the Council's feeling that the trunk lines could be run along Crosstown Boulev~rd in the future, possibly in conjunction with an upgrading of that county road, since there is no immediate need to extend the lines now. They also noted the policy of not leap frogging, though this would only be a short distance to extend the utility lines to service the plat, nor did they want to force assessments onto the larger developed lots. I Mr. Erickson explained the plan for the trunk would be to cross the plat and come out to Hanson Boulevard, with the plat being serviced with laterals. He asked if the Council wished to size the trunk for possible extension north to service up to 161st Avenue even though that northern area is not included in any future urban service area. Or is it the intent only to develop the area designated as urban and the remaining area as rural? That decision will affect the size of the pipe. Mr. Windschitl estimated there is 15.5 acres between his plat and 161s~ Avenue along Hanson Boulevard. After some discussion, the Council agreed if that area can be serviced in the future, the trunk should be enlarged at this time to be able to service it. Mr. Erickson stated they will look at that when designing the sewer system. He thought the service for 161st was about the extent of the gravity system. Either the line would stop there or consideration would have to be giveil to a lift station if the desire would be to extend urban development beyond that point. \ / Several Councilmembers indicated a desire to see a second access to the townhome area for fire and safety purposes. They also wanted to be sure the road shown as potential development lying to the east of the northern portion of the project is able to connect on both ends for Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - August 6, 1996 Page 6 -' (Sketch Plan/Chesterton Commons, Continued) traffic flow. There was agreement that an MSA road through this project would not be desirable and would only encourage traffic and create problems through a densely developed area. They agreed that the ponds that are created should be enhanced aesthetically. The Council also agreed that there should be a trail system within the plat. Councilmember Knight indicted this plat accentuates the need to establish a park and ride facility down Hanson Boulevard. Mr. Carlberg stated that is being considered as a buffer with the landfill area, and Staff will be contacting the bus transit company about that issue. There were no further comments. SKETCH PLAN/ROUND LAKE SITE Mr. Erickson reviewed the sketch plan for the proposed development of five urban residential lots. The sewer and water trunk lines, which are two or three lots south of the area, would be extended to the plat. The trunks are relatively shallow, so this would be about the end of those lines. The Planning Commission has concurred with the Staff report. Mr. Carlberg stated the one lot on Round Lake Boulevard is tax forfeit, and the other has a house that faces 144th AveEue. He did not believe any house would be assessed with the extension of the utilities. The \ Council generally concurred with the Staff report on the proposed plat. ) PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING Craig Kronholm, Adolfson and Peterson, reviewed their proposal to provide professional construction management services for the proposed Public Works Building. Their pre-construction fee would be $34,052 to add an additional 30,000 square feet to the existing building and would take care of everything up to the first shovel in the ground. Phase 2 is services during construction and post construction for $58,698. They would handle this construction the same as what is being done with the City Hall project, getting direction from the Council and Staff, reporting back and proceeding to the next step. If the project should be scaled back, the fees would be adjusted accordingly. They are estimating about $2 million for the addition, but that could change depending on the type of equipment desired in the building. The Council was concerned with where the funding will come from for the building. Mr. Fursman stated he presented a report a short time ag~ with possible funding sources, noting the $35,000 for the first phase is available. The Council must set priorities for those funds, decide the specific sources for this proj ect, plus determine how to fund the building itself. There are several options for funding that will not involve a referendum or raising the tax levy. He can have a more detailed report for the Council by the next regular meeting. " / The Council agreed to meeting but noted the facility available hear the report on financing at the next regular need to proceed immediately in order to have the to house equipment in late 1997. Mr. Fursman /~"p:z,",,~_.,,\ I \ ! \ , I j I \.1.. ) "',./ ~..-:.:..:-,... CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 " POLICY February 1988 Building Pad Construction details for R-3 & R-4 1. All organic material shall be removed between the side lot lines and removed to at least 100 feet from the front property line. 2. Fill used shall be of clean, buildable material such as, sand and shall be placed and compacted to acceptable engineering standards. All fill placed shall conform to attached X-Section. 3. All areas of excavation shall be inspected by a soils engineer prior to filling. ~-_.... Northern Natural Gas Company Suite 210, 1600 West 82nd Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 (612) 887.1700 Ms. Amy Gurski Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc, 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 RECEIVED FEB 181997 CITY OF ANDOVER February 12, 1997 Re: Preliminary Plat of Chesterton Commons Gerald Windschitl/Ashford Development Corp. NNG Tract #877-1-57, Anoka County, Minnesota Dear Ms, Gurski: Per our telephone conversation today, attached is a copy of a preliminary plat for a similar project that I am working on for your information and use. As we discussed, the proposed street entrance at 154th Lane NW and Hanson Boulevard would interfere with ) Northern Natural Gas Company's (Northern) pipeline facilities and would prevent Northern from access to our pipeline facilities for maintenance and/or repair. You should also be aware that Northern has a casing vent at this location which would require the relocation of Northern's pipeline facilities in order to accommodate the proposed construction of 154th Lane NW, Any relocation and/or modification of Northern's pipeline facilities would be at the expense of the landowner, Ashford Development, For your information, one of Northern's primary concerns is for pipeline safety and its compliance with the federal pipeline safety regulations governing interstate gas transmission pipelines. One of the primary incidents of Northern's pipeline easement is that the pipeline and appurtenances thereto be accessible for maintenance and repair as required by the Department of Transportation Office of Pipeline Safety, Construction of structures or improvements (such as a public street) over the area of Northern's easement rights creates a risk of danger that the pipeline might be damaged, and obstructs Northern's right of access for maintenance and repair. Northern is the best judge whether a proposed structure or improvement in the easement right-of-way is safe. Any encroachment hindering the safe operation and maintenance of the pipeline is expressly prohibited in the easement. Therefore, Northern must raise an objection to the above referenced plat, and requests that the plat be revised to provide for the relocation and/or modification of the street entrance at 154th Lane NW and Hanson Boulevard so that it will not interfere with Northern's pipeline facilities. \ ) An Affiliate of Enron Corp. Ms. Amy Gurski February 12, 1997 Page 2 I It is my understanding that you are currently working on revisions to the above plat and will provide me with a copy of the revised plat as soon as it becomes available. I have received a copy of the storm sewer plans and as we discussed, the manholes will be removed off Northern's easement. To date, no sewer and water or other utilities are designed. Please refer to my letter dated January 14, 1997, to David Carlberg (I previously sent to you) with regard to general restrictions that apply to Northern's easement. If the plans are approved by Northern, an Agreement in the form of an Encroachment Agreement will be drafted and must be executed by both Northern and Ashford Development. Please be advised that no construction activities can commence on Northern's easement without our written permission. I appreciate this opportunity to clarify Northern's easement interest in the above referenced development. If you have any further questions or need additional information, please feel free to call me at (612)887-1730. " I Your cooperation and assistance in this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, NORTHERNNATlJRAL GAS COMPANY ~4k( 1/:1vJ0Y\ Christa Johnson ?' Right-of-Way Agent cJ Enclosure( s) cc: Clark Dahlin - North Branch Office (w/o enclosure) Gerald Windschitl- Ashford Development (w/o enclosure) David Carlberg - City of Andover (w/o enclosure) Jane K. Pemble - County of Anoka (w/o enclosure) , H1DAT A/WORDILETrERSIWINDSCHT.DOC , , / Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Metro Waters - 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106-6793 Telephone: (612) 772-7910 Fax: (612) 772-7977 January 17, 1997 Mr. Merland Otto Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 RE: Chesterton Commons, Ashford Development, Inc., SWl/4 of SWl/4, Section 14, and NWl/4, Section 23, T32N-R24W, City of Andover, Anoka County Dear Mr. Otto: We have reviewed the site plans dated December 1996 (received January 6, 1997) for the above- referenced proposal (parts of Sections 14 and 23, T32N-R25W) and have the following comments to offer: 1. Public water wetland 2-704W is on the proposed site. Any activity below the ordinary high water (OHW) elevation, which alters the course, current or cross-section of protected waters or wetlands, is under the juri~diction of DNR and may require a DNR protected water~ permit. " 2. The site is not within a shoreland district. 3. There is no mapped floodplain on the site, 4. Stormwater sedimentation/treatment ponds, or other appropriate stormwater treatment features, should be included in the plan. "",C,_.: . 5. There'shouldbe some type of dedicated easement, covenantor'deed'restriCfion' foi the properties adjacent to the wetland areas. This would help to ensure that property owners are aware that the DNR, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the City of Andover, and the Coon Creek Watershed District have jurisdiction over the areas and that the wetlands cannot be altered without appropriate permits, !~',;.,."'" ' 6. There may be wetlands on the site that are not under DNR jurisdiction. The U. S. Army Corps of Engineers should be consulted regarding pertinent federal regulations for activities in wetlands. In addition, impacts to these wetlands should be evaluated by the city in accordance with the Minnesota Wetlands Conservation Act of 1991. , , , D'R Int"urmallon: nI2-2%.11 I Si, 1.:<1111- ihl1-nlHHI . TTY: 11 12.29h-)-I:<';, I.XIIfI.h,-..;Q2'J \11 Equ.d \)PI1'lrlUl:,I\ El11;'i'I\~'! \....It" \'.dll~" [)I~~'r~il\ ft. P~lnto.:d ''II rL.....,.;.:d I'.q''''; ( "fll."i\lil":.1 c.J \lli1lll~Ulll .'l 01'1'. 1''''1-C''lhdl:1<.:f \'\.-I";~' ~.,~ .', .. , , .f Mr. Merland Otto January 17, 1997 Page 2 7. The following comments are general and apply to all proposed developments: a, Appropriate erosion control measures should be taken during the construction period, The Minnesota Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook (Board of Water & Soil Resources and Association of Metropolitan and Soil and Water Conservation Districts) guidelines, or their equivalent, should be followed, b, If construction involves dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons per day or I million gallons per year, a DNR appropriations permit is needed. You are advised that it typically takes approximately 60 days to process the permit application. c, The comments in this letter address DNR - Division of Waters jurisdictional matters and concerns, These comments should not be construed as DNR support or lack thereof for a particular project, Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have questions. Sincerely, ~A.~ /~, Tom Hovey Area Hydrologist THIll! c: u.s. Army Corps ofpngineers, Tim Fell City of Andover V Coon Creek Watershed District Anoka Conservation District '. f ANOKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 16015 Central Ave. NE, SUite 103 Ham Lake, MN 55304 Phone: (612) 434-2030 Fax: (612) 434-2094 January 31. 1997 Mr, Merland Olto Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. 360 I Thurston A vcnuc Anoka, Minnesota 55303 Re: Preliminaty Comments for Chesterton Commons. Andover, i\linnesota Dear Mr. Otto. The following letter outlines the preliminary comments for Chestenon Commons, This application was received on January 6. 1997 from Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc,. an authorized agent of Ashford Development. The application describes the proposed filling of4,300 sq, ft. of Type 1 and 2 wetlands, and 9,770 sq, ft, ofType3 wetlands for a total of 14,070 square feet. This proposal would utilize the 5,000 square foot deminimus for the Type I and 2 wetlands and the 400 sq, ft. deminimus for the Type 3 wetland, The wetland impact that would be mitigated would be 9,370 sq, ft. This would be a~complished by creating 9,700 sq, ft. of Type 3/5 wetland and 101,956 sq, ft. of storm\vater r~tcntion ponds. Under MN Rules Ch, 8420, 0510 Subp. 3, the Anoka Conservation District's responsibility is to comment on the public value, location. size, and type of wetland for replacement applications, In this case, the application was not received from the LGU (Cuon Creek Watershed District) so the comments.should be considered as preliminary. / The District reviewed the application and have the following comments: The ~pp:jcant Can!1Ol cumaine tne dcminimus amounts from Basins 6 and 8 with Basins 9 and II, Under IVIN Rules Ch, S420,O I 22 Sub!" 9 Letter B it stales: 'Thc amounts listed in item A may not be combined on a project." Thus, a project can only utilize only one deminimus, The applicant could combine the amounts fonn Basins 6 and 8 and still fit under the 5.000 sq. n. deminimus. Note: The applicant will need to contact the City of Andover to cl'nfirm that the impacted wetlands arc not within any shoreland wetland protection zones; which would decrease t:,e deminimus to 400 sq. ft.. . It is the applicant's responsibility to demonstrate to the Coon Creek Watershed District that the fill within Basins 9 and II is unavoidable. Economic considerations alone does not make an alternative not feasible and prudent. . The request for sequencing flexibility does not seem to correlate with MN Rules Ch. 8420.0520 Sub;:" 7a requirements, For example: L Basins 6 and 8 are already exempt; 2. the applicant has not demonstrated fully that other alternatives to filling Basin 1 are not feasible or prudent; 3. the ~torrr:.v.,'~ter por.ding p~hHc Value credits wouid not be a factor if #2 above cannot be demonstrated. lespectfully, ~ec.J~ 'j.M~ Becky L. Straub District Technician cc: Todd Haas, City of Andover Tim Kelly, Coon Creek Watershed District Gerald Windschitl. Ashford Development, lnc, III Hakanson Anderson 1 Assoc., Inc. 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, Minnesota 55303 612/427-5860 Fax 612/427-}-4eT- 0520 I , / February 7, 1997 Mr. David L. Calrberg Community Development Director City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, MN 55304 RECE1VED FEB 071997 CITY OF ANDOVER RE: Chesterton Commons Preliminary Plat Dear Mr. Carlberg: Attached are ten revised copies of the Preliminary Plat and Grading Plan for Chesterton Commons, As discussed, we have made an alignment change on Eagle Street, as requested by the City, and an alignment change on Avocet Street in Phase III. The Avocet Street change was requested by the Coon Creek Watershed District to minimize wetland fill. / Due to time constraints, we were unable to change the Grading Plan to reflect these alignment changes. However, we will correct all Plans to correspond to these changes as soon as possible. Thank you for your cooperation and understanding, Sincerely, HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Ar:k~;LhA jig cc: Jerry Windschitl .' 2054-16.dc3 / Engineers Landscape Architects Surveyors I CITY of ANDOVER CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF i\lINNESOT A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m" or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday. February I I, 1997 at the Oak View Middle SchooL 15400 Hanson Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota to consider the Preliminary Plat of "'Chesterton Commons" consisting of 2 19 single family urban residential lots as being requested by Ashford Development Corporation located east of Hanson Boulevard NW and generally located north of Crosstown Boulevard NW. The property is legally described as follows: The Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, Except the following described parcels, That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Southeasterly of the centerline of County Road No, 18; and That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 32, Range 24; Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest Comer of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 23; thence east on the south line thereof to the centerline of Anoka County Road No. 18; thence northeasterly along said centerline a distance of 55 I .50 feet; thence northwesterly at right angles to said centerline a distance of 404.00 feet; thence southwesterly at right angles to last described line 675.26 feet, more or less, to the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence southerly on the west line thereof to the point of beginning, according to the United States Government survey thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota; and The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 32. Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to restrictions, reservations and easement of record. if any. All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and location, A copy of the application and location will be available at the Oak View Middle School for review prior to said meeting, ~ta Victoria Volk. City Clerk , / Publication dates: January 31,1997 & February 7,1997 PIN: 143224310002 PIN: 143224310003 HORST DAVID E & GERALDINE M PETERSON DONALD H 1292 161ST AVE NW 01374 161ST AVE NW , ;'lDOVER MN 55304 ANOKA MN 55304 PIN: 143224330001 PIN: 143224340001 WINDSCHITL GERALD G & CAROL A LASHINSKI JAMES M & JANET L 3640 152ND LN NW 1326 161ST AVE NW ANDOVER MN 55304 ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 143224430001 PIN: 223224110001 BOYUM LORETTA MARY CENTER OAKS 1101161ST AVE NW 13736 JOHNSON ST NE ANDOVER MN 55304 HAM LAKE MN 55304 PIN: 223224140006 PIN: 223224140007 ANOKA HENN IND SCHOOL DIST 11 AN HENN IND SCHOOL DIST NO 11 11299 HANSON BLVD NW 11299 HANSON BLVD NW COON RAPIDS MN 55433 COON RAPIDS MN 55433 PIN: 223224140008 PIN: 223224410001 AN HENN IND SCHOOL DIST NO 11 GROW CITY OF 11299 HANSON BLVD NW 1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW - COON RAPIDS MN 55433 ANDOVER MN 55304 " , / PIN: 233224120001 PIN: 233224130001 KOZLOWSKI SOPHIE KOZLOWSKI SOPHIE 1021 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW 1021 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224130002 PIN: 233224130003 ERICKSON CURTIS G & G D GOSWICK EARL G 1155 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW 1140 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224210001 PIN: 233224220001 WINDSCHITL GERALD G & CAROL A WINDSCHITL GERALD G & CAROL A 3640 152ND LN NW 299 COON RAPIDS BD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 COON RAPIDS MN 55433 PIN: 233224230002 PIN: 233224230003 WINDSCHITL GERALD G & CAROL A WINDSCHITL GERALD G & CAROL A 3640 152ND LN NW 3640 152ND LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304 ANDOVER MN 55304 N:233224240002 PIN: 233224240002 , KOPIS CHESTER A& DOROTHY J KOPIS CHESTER A & DOROTHY J 1296 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW 1296 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224240003 WHALSTROM BETTY J 1260 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW :NDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224240004 VANHEEL GENE 1220 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224240005 WINDSCHITL GERALD G & CAROL A 3640 152ND LANE NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224240006 BECKELMAN KATHERINE M 1261 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224310025 HOLASEK WINSLOW I 1159 ANDOVER BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224310027 RODS CONSTR INC 1357 152ND LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224310028 HOLASEK WINSLOW I 3538 MISSISSIPPI DR NW COON RAPIDS MN 55433 PIN: 233224310029 D H LAND COMPANY INC 13800 SYCAMORE ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224320002 HAMILTON LORA G 6615 HWY 10 NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 233224320007 WINSLOW HILLS PROPERTIES 3538 MISSISSIPPI DR NW COON RAPIDS MN 55433 , , / Pin: 14-~2-24-33-0002 Cambridg~ Capital, Inc. 941 HillWind Road NE, suite 301 MinneapoJis, MN 55432 Pin: 23-32-24-22-0001 Cambrid9b Capital, Inc. 941 Hil1~ind Road NE , Suite 301 Minneapolis, MN 55432 . ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DA TE March 4, 1997 AGENDA SECnON 110. Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM 110. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Round Barn Site /e,. Planning -5vJ~ BY: John Hinzman City Planner Request The City Council is asked to review an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to create a RM-2, Residential - Multiple Density land use district and to change the land use designation ofa 9.15 acre parcel at 3331 Round Lake Blvd, NW, commonly known as the Round Barn site, from C, Commercial and RU, Residential- Urban Single Family to RM-2. A senior citizen housing development consisting of 130-140 units is proposed to be built on the site by Adolphson & Peterson and Presbyterian Homes of Minnesota, , I Background The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the proposal at the February 25, 1997 meeting, A number of neighbors gave testimony in opposition of the request. Concerns of the residents included a devaluation of property, an unexpected change in land use, preservation ofthe Round Barn site, potential use of the site for non-senior rental units, and increased traffic, The Planning Commission recommended denial of the comprehensive plan amendment for the reasons reflected in the attached draft minutes. Attached for your review are the staff report and draft minutes from the February 25, 1997 Planning, a petition from surrounding neighbors and Zoning Commission meeting, " ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: rt: 7J 1,\ M lYlJ'\\~~u U I I Public Hearing/Comprehensive Plan Amendment DRAFT Mr. Hinzman reviewed the request for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to create a RM-2, Residential Multiple Dwelling land use district and to change the land use district from RU, Residential Urban Single Family and C, Commercial to RM-2, Residential Multiple Dwelling for the property at 3331 Bunker Lake Boulevard, The purpose of the proposed amendment is to accommodate senior citizen housing as proposed by Presbyterian Homes and Adolfson and Peterson, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 473,858 states "If the comprehensive municipal plan is in conflict with the zoning ordinance, the zoning ordinance shall be brought into conformance with the plan,..after August 1,1995, a local government unit shall not adopt any fiscal device or official control which is in conflict with its comprehensive plan," , Mr, Hinzman explained that the development will be a 130-140 unit senior housing facility on the Round Barn Site. At the present time, the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates this area as C, Commercial and RU, Residential Urban Single Family, The property is currently zoned SC, Shopping Center and R-4 Single Family Urban, The applicant proposes to rezone the parcel to M-2, Multiple Dwelling and to develop the parcel as senior housing under the planned unit development ordinance, A rezoning to M-2 would be inconsistent with the current land use designation; therefore, an amendment to the comprehensive plan is necessary. Dave Carlberg noted that a Special Use Permit was issued several years ago to allow the operation of the Round Barn, Commissioner Gamache asked if the developer is looking at this site because of the proximity to the Downtown Center, Mr, Hinzman stated yes, the seniors will be able to walk to the Downtown Center and there is also a bus line nearby, Commissioner Squires noted that changing the Comprehensive Plan doesn't mean that we're opening up the whole city to that zoning district. Mr, Carlberg explained that if you have an RM-2land use district you can designate what is going to be in those specific areas, He also noted that if this amendment is approved it will then go to the City Council and the Metropolitan Council and if it is approved, the applicant can then apply for a rezoning and a Special Use Permit for the Planned Unit Development, MOTION by Barry, seconded by Wells to open the public hearing, Motion carried unanimously, DRAfl Tim Casey, 3312 -139th Lane NW is opposed to the amendment. He stated that when the people in Woodland Creek bought their homes they purchased them at a premium price. The value of their homes will go down if this is allowed to go in, The commercial piece of property was zoned for neighborhood conveniences, He didn't' feel this use belongs in this area, Mike larek, 3321-138th Avenue NW didn't think this use belongs in this area. He stated there is a lot of land in the city that is better suited for this type of development, Shelly Chapin, 3132 -139th Avenue NW thought this is a good idea for the city but felt the location was wrong. It's an ideal place for seniors but it's not a good fit for the neighborhood, Mr, Carlberg explained that based on the current zoning it can be single family homes on 80' x 130' lots. Charles Kemp, 3322 - 138th Lane NW stated that the amount of traffic would increase and he is opposed to the whole proposal. '. Mark Madden, 3363 - 138th - when he moved here they were told that all of this area was going to be single family homes, He is concerned with the traffic, He asked what the next step in the process is, Mr, Hinzman explained that the Metropolitan Council has to approve it and the City Council. If it is approved, it goes through the rezoning process, This item will be on the March 4th City Council agenda. It was noted that the Metropolitan Council requires a 60 day review period but it can take less time. Mark Madden thought that the property values would go down if this is allowed, He also noted that there are some huge trees that would have to be cut down.. A resident asked what would happen if the senior citizen died and willed the apartment to him. Would he be allowed to live there? lohn Mehrkens, Presbyterian Homes explained that he would not be able to live there unless he is 55 years old, These properties are going to be rentals, Several residents felt that because they are going to be rentals and if Presbyterian Homes can't rent out the complex they could end up with something that is not desirable. . / D~Afu / Joel Eberle, 13794 Orchid Street NW presented a petition requesting that the property remain single family, He noted that previously the Mayor had asked the developers to find a different location for this project, Phyllis Erickson, 13824 Orchid Street stated that she is not necessarily against it but was sympathetic with the neighbors, She felt that there could be worse things than a senior housing project in the area, She would be against apartments, Bonnie Kleese, 13782 Orchid Street stated that there are a lot of trees in her backyard that will be cut down if this project goes in, She would be sad to see this project put in this area, Tim Casey didn't think it would be justifiable to the homeowners in Woodland Creek to allow this to go through, John Mehrkens, Presbyterian Homes explained that they were brought into this project because they felt this would be a perfect site for a senior housing complex, They have developed projects in areas surrounded by residential in the past. He noted that the Round Barn is an integral part of the project, He further noted that a neighborhood meeting was held several weeks ago and the residents in the area requested that they do a study to determine if the property values in areas where they have other projects have gone down, He noted that is a difficult study to do because there are a number of variables involved. MOTION by Barry, seconded by Wells to close the public hearing, Motion carried unanimously. " . I The Commission was asked to take a straw vote to indicate their feelings on the project, Commissioner Apel stated that he couldn't go along with the proposal. He stated that there are a lot of people in the city who want senior housing but not in this area. Commissioner Barry noted that with all of the opposition that has been heard she would agree with Mr, Apel. However she didn't think that this would create a lot of traffic. She felt that a single family housing project would create more traffic. Chairman Peek stated that his concern is the multiple . housing, The Comprehensive Plan at this time indicates this area as a single family site, Commissioner Gamache felt that if Presbyterian Homes backs out within a year we don't know what we will end up with, He would be against this change, Commissioner Wells stated that due to a conflict of interest she would not comment, Commissioner Squires felt that the property would be a good site for a senior housing project if the existing housing was not already there.. Commissioner Leudtke suggested that the soon to be formed Comprehensive Plan Task Force look at where this project would fit in the city. /i'\ 10) II rr-.....U Uli~v-~U" I \ ) MOTION by Apel, seconded by Leudtke that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council that the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan not be forwarded to the Metropolitan Council and that they should not pursue this amendment at this time, Motion carried on a 6 yes, I abstain (Wells) vote, This will go to the City Council on March 4,1997. / \ J / I \ J To The Honorable Council of the CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA Date: f/X3f!7 No, Council Members: We, the undersigned. owners of real prope.rty in the City of Andover, Minnesota do hereby petition/request your honorable body to consIder the followmg : I. That the subject site retain its single-family zoning (R-4) II: In the event that the proposed site is rezoned. we do hereby petition/request your honorable body to consider the following lIsted conditions as part of the final approval for the proposed Presbyterian Homes Senior Housing project (the Adolfson property): A) That a substantial earthen berm, topped with substantial spruce/pine trees ten feet or greater in height. shrubs and other landscaping be constructed along the northerly edge of subject site in the area lying between OrchId Street NW and Quay Street. B) That some of the healthier trees between 13782 Orchid Street and the earthen berm be left and the unhealthy ones be removed, for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the homeowner. C) That the northerly and easterly edge of the proposed visitor parking area be shielded from the residence to the north of the subject project by utilizing tall landscaping and/or shrubbery, That the project use four-inch or larger diameter deciduous trees for landscaping. D) That the driveway for the proposed twin homes and for the proposed visitor parking area be directed to \1arigold Street ~W and that the other senior housing residents utilize Quay Street, for the purpose of gaining green sp'ace between the project and the homeowners. E) That the exterior coloration/siding material of the proposed complex shall be neutral or earth tones. F) That the senior housing complex be fully taxable by the city. We trust your honorable body will grant the same. Respectfully submitted, Property Owner Property Address II :..... /..../ ,,(c'~:. II , ) I Date: ) -.J5-Q7 No. To The Honor~ble Council ofthc CITY OF ANDOVER, t\HNNESOTA Council Members: We, the undersigned. owners of real property in the City of Ando\'er, t\linnesota, do hereby petition/request your honorable body to consider thc foI1O\\in,!!. : I. That the subject site retain its single-family zoning (R-4) II. In the event that the proJ?osed site is rezoned, we do hereby petitionlrequest your honorable body to consider the following listed conditions as part of the final approval for the proposed Presb)1erian Homes Senior Housing project (the Adolfson property): A) That a substantial earthen benn, topped with substantial spruce/pine trees ten feet or greater in height, shrubs and other landscaping be constructed along the northerly edge of subject site in the area lying between Orchid Street NW and Quay Street .~ B) That some of the healthier trees between 13782 Orchid Street and the earthen bem. be left and the unhealthy ones be removed, for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the homeo\\TIer. C) That the northerly and easterly edge of the proposed visitor parking area be shielded from the residence to the north of the subJect project by utilizing tall landscaping and/or shrubbety. That the project use four-inch or larger diameter decIduous trees for landscaping. D) That the driveway for the proposed twin homes and for the proposed visitor parking area be directed to Marigold Street NW and that the other senior housing residents utilize Quay Street, for the purpose of gaining green space between the project and the homeowners. E) That the exterior coloration/siding material of the proposed complex shall be neutral or earth tones. F) That the senior housing complex be fully taxable by the city. We trust your honorable body will grant the same. Respectfully submitted, Property Owner }>roperty Address <--...) Date:$ /2L No, To The Honorable Council of the CITY OF ANDOVER. MINNESOTA Council Members: , J We. the undersigned. owners of real property in the City of Andoyer, Minnesota. do hereby petition/request your honorable body to consider the following: I. That the subject site retain its single-family zoning (R-4) II. In the eyent that the proposed site is rezoned, we do hereby petition/request your honorable body to consider the following lIsted conditions as part of the final approval for the proposed Presbyterian Homes Senior Housing project (the Adolfson property): A) TIlat a substantial earthen benn, topped with substantial spruce/pine trees ten feet or greater in height, shrubs and other landscaping be constructed along the northerly edge of subject site in the area lying between Orchid Street NW and Quay Street. B) That some of the healthier trees between 13782 Orchid Street and the earthen benn be left and the unhealthy ones be removed, for the purpose of protecting the privacy ofthe homeowner. C) That the northerly and easterly edge of the proposed visitor parking area be shielded from the residence to the north of the subject project by utilizing tall landscaping and/or shrubbery. That the project use four-inch or larger diameter deciduous trees for landscaping. D) That the driyeway for the proposed twin homes and for the proposed visitor parking area be directed to Marigold Street ';\.W and that the other senior housing residents utilize Quay Street, for the purpose of gaining green space between the project and the homeowners. E) That the exterior coloration/siding material of the proposed complex shall be neutral or earth tones. F) That the senior housing complex be fully taxable by the city. We trust your honorable body will granl the same. Respectfully submitted, '\ ) Property Owner Property Address II /1 ~ t" 2 " cJ .;,; y ,,/,"-- V I ? " " J Date: ;:2 ..;)5 -17 No. To TIle Honorable Council of the CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA Councill\lcmbers: We, the undersigned, O\\11ers of real property in the City of Andover. Minnesota, do hereby petition/request your honorable body to consider the following: I. That the subject site retain its single-family zoning (R-4) II. In the event that the proposed site is rezoned, we do hereby petition/request your honorable body to consider the following lIsted conditions as part of the final approval for the proposed Presbyterian Homes Senior Housing project (the Adolfson property): A) That a substantial earthen berm, topped with substantial spruce/pine trees ten feet or greater in height, shru~s and other landscaping be constructed along the northerly edge of subject site in the area lying between OrchId Street NW and Quay Street. . B) That some of the healthier trees between 13782 Orchid Street and the earthen benn be left and the unhealthy ones be removed, for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the homeowner. C) That the northerly and easterly edge of the proposed visitor parking area be shielded from the residence to the north of the subject project by utilizing tall landscaping and/or shrubbery, That the project use four-inch or larger diameter deciduous trees for landscaping. D) That the driveway for the proposed twin homes and for the proposed visitor parking area be directed to Marigold Street NW and that the other senior housing residents utilize Quay Street, for the purpose of gaining green space between the project and the homeo\',rners. E) That the exterior coloration/siding material of the proposed complex shall be neutral or earth tones. F) That the senior housing complex be fully taxable by the city. We trust your honorable body will grant the same. Respectfully submitted, , I Property Owner 'Property Address \ \ / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUESTF,OR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE February 25,1997 AGENDA ITEM 4, Public Hearing: Comprehensive Plan Amendment relating to Senior Housin! Proposal -- Round Barn Site . ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: John Hinzman Citv Planner BY: Request The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to create a RM-2, Residential Multiple-Dwelling land use district and to change the land use district from RU, Residential Urban Single Family and C, Commercial to RM-2, Residential-Multiple Dwelling on property located at 3331 Bunker Lake Boulevard NW, commonly known as the Round Barn Site, legally described as follows: The west 715,02 feet ofthe south 487,38 feet of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 32, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County Minnesota, subject to easements of record and Lot 1, Block 4, Andover Community Shopping Center Applicable Ordinances Minnesota State Statute Chapter 473,858 states "If the comprehensive municipal plan is in conflict with the zoning ordinance, the zoning ordinance shall be brought into conformance with the plan.., after August 1, 1995, a local govemment unit shall not adopt any fiscal device or official control which is in conflict with its comprehensive plan," Because the zoning change needed to accommodate the proposed use would be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, an amendment to the plan is needed, Adjacent Zoning and Land Use Southwest West R-4; Residential- Woodland Creek Addition R-4; Marigold Street NW, vacant R-4; Bunker Lake Blvd, NW, Residential- Woodland Terrace 1st & 2nd Additions, Tutor Time Day Care NB; Big Wheel\Rossi Auto Parts SC; Quay Street NW, Firstar Bank of Andover North East South \ ) Page Two Comprehensive Plan Amendment Senior Housing, Round Barn Site February 25, 1997 Background Adolphson & Peterson and Presbyterian Homes of Minnesota propose to construct a 130- 140 unit senior housing facility on the Round Barn site, The Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates this area as C, Commercial and RU - Residential - Urban Single Family, The property is currently zoned SC, Shopping Center and R-4, Single Family Urban, The applicant proposes to rezone the parcel to M-2, Multiple Dwelling and develop the parcel as senior housing under the planned unit development ordinance, A rezoning to M-2 would be inconsistent with the current land use designation for the site, therefore an amendment to the comprehensive plan is necessary, The Comprehensive Plan does not include a land use district that would accommodate the senior housing proposal. In order for the proposed development to be constructed, an amendment to Chapter V, Section E of the Comprehensive Plan would be needed. The creation of a RM-2, Residential- Multiple Density land use district would reflect the use and density levels of the senior housing development and consistent with the M-2, Multiple Dwelling zoning district. Following is the proposed amendment: , / 3 RM-2. Residential - Multiple Dwelling The Residential - Multiple Dwelling land use is defined as land within the MUSA that is designated for the development of multiple family structures Residential development in these areas is intended for a gross density of 13 units per acre or ~ Commission Options I, The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to create a RM-2, Residential - Multiple Dwelling land use district and to designate the following parcel RM-2 accordingly: The west 715,02 feet ofthe south 487.38 feet ofthe southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 32, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County Minnesota, subject to easements of record and \ Lot 1, Block 4, Andover Community Shopping Center .' \ Page Three Comprehensive Plan Amendment Senior Housing, Round Barn Site February 25, 1997 2, The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council denial of an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to create a RM-2, Residential - Multiple Dwelling land use district and to designate the following parcel RM-2 accordingly: The west 715,02 feet of the south 487,38 feet of the southeast quarter ofthe northeast quarter of Section 32, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County Minnesota, subject to easements of record and Lot I, Block 4, Andover Community Shopping Center 3, The Planning and Zoning Commission can table the item pending further information from staff. Attachments A-I General Location Map A-2 Site Location Map A-3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application \ / ;0- o 73 ~ D ~ I - - 1 "''''j II ~ I~II I 1111111 "- ) h ~ ''''''i -1(") Ii:: -< '''''''I :;__ '41!f-' I C- ~j~m[~,_,,- g II' ~ ~",,, ~ l,l.m .[... ,', < ,',N>- ~ + . ,,'-. '*'~ =. !:J " ' '~ ,. ;~ " 41,;' ~ .. ~3t i i l,,,, "' Til7f CO, il ~),,~ '~,~ ,WI!J'~" 1,','$, 'l;:i..~ = I ~ ,~4>! Nl' _";",,/'.~ ,...' "'1" ,'-: ~ j I ~O,..,' .' c;:'f.;:~-1' _ J.J;;\iri'.' , ",: 1,ir;l1!: ltI'I"".~:i<, ~ (!;I_"!;__i--' ',mr Jillf" I ' ! ' - ri'I';' ".~. . ' = ill,' r ' ~ , " :~ L~,' ~~. :;?:",,~ ~ ~l ' . t1:I~ :rw/H~. . , ,,~. . ". ",., , ~ I rl ,'"m! ' . m ,\"" " ~ "lil'u'(c'" ~~~ ~, " -J:T W ,1, ' = , ~ ,.. "k;"'~~' C- ~ )it f.I n', . ,'....,.-' I" IJl;JIII'H iIT ::= J ,I ! I o~ I II-r;.- -, I\.,;q- l I rei! tmrJ ft1ml '1 .1 ~~' m\~j -!~ ~:: , ' _.. L ~ f-".' d-" .1E1.tIP!l1l1) ,~"I'I" ~ =c I ' . ~,,_ -~~- rE VI';:'~' I u II ::::"" . ,,' . _ . i m_ +_LL :.;', ~" . I ~: _:: 0" .-E'}' " _ ' _) , "/- _ II \/r~c ' r:'" ' r - n ".~,~. . - , ..' .. .. ',,If'' +-i- Y M-_u I ~!' '~~ .' "'~'~'~I~~' \E~'" I r:ru>-- .-11 tAr i" '-' .~TIJ;;1 J=;' ,iJl! jJ" . .. I I" +- ".~ . ,fIiIl!j. . ." ~~'I;j.thl ,~ . ,L~'I1~WJ 0 ,ruJm~V / 'll' \ O:::::I~ --~l~,:'.; (fJi~m.mI '--=~: " II I =i 'V'-". > lIT -~ ~ "'" E'..."....". -M.' ,:,}, "~I ~~;_:iI~~::l " .'1 'l . - . _,6 L - ,,'Ell} IF'' 'I: '.I~~~'rr~: =:~" , 'r:~:I' - ~VL--'1h lj:;;:';;,t :'ih\.,i",o a) II . C .h II J=l' -, 'I~' --'If/'.Jjll:f: " "f.,_, =~:"! I ...1 ' ' ..." . "" ~ 'I . ," I ,,, , ".; __: ,[,' _ : ~ __ 0 ::::J U,;: ..... ! ----- ~I~ _ . !,_n, 'I ''"' II // u.I = ,- ,-- .u~ 111' I i iT@---:"' vo"" .' -' "" -' ' ."" ' ' ~i"A'---! "'[0::".'- _, I l ~,\ ,1" 'T"-\~ --" <'.- =:: .,y , ,,,< '" ' .. " T'" "" n,fTi'-L1 --i:J ,n " XT'" " ' " 1 ' !>II n "'. ,II.'I<'IJI~ f.\i,." .\ ! ~ If- I" - +--. ___.1/ I I ~'o ::::: e~._1 ,'I I!Lji:~ ",'11 . ~ "1'1f5'D ' . ,be.:=!-" ... . ' 1/" ", ",' " ~ " ' - " 'i;-';'I -'- u.IlL/.j.,E ;JO,' ; ","'_ ,," ~ '" ~F?' ~ It ~~ I I II =., "~,_I ~I I Xc.; iii' ,.,\,.,J- .~~I!l1Jtl ~'O 1 JT[ ~\ I .... 1 :: I . ,I i' !, :-I~"Y~i~I' I. . ",;,~I. 'C"....... ,J .'4 - ,,," . . ~.,,,.--,-\ =.. -----,..J. , =r'l"1 0 .' . "."" .'" ~ '~I J, -" L !!!!!!!! II' ; :-~' ;:mn' :,,,,,,-;],,,,,,,', 1;~IIJN,JlIlLlIlI",'- -\' ~ ","" I! I""" "'''~ ,--,"","'" ",JIl'TI " ~ """"""" "., ~ ' ".11"': .,11 . - ~I \.- . . , , I I I . I 1 I I I . .-- , . I : ~ I I 1 I I I I I -- _ .., : I.: III ~ . . . . -=:: I ILhi.;'lj II t1~l j)L. 4/- 1 " ) .J .' \ / 7'0 3:: -0 iJ ~~~>SlSl"df';1 S'Q:<l:<l:<l . ~ ~ ita rUl.ll~~~cl' ~ ~ ~ "ft fr ~ ~. g g g; CL '"1 t::J t::J 0::.. c.n 0 Q_ s. g. [ p, ~ ""0 .w ~ -7'I~e.~~ :!"'. ~c::~.,,~n ~ g.cre!.aC ~ :k- ~' ~ ~ tj ~ So t) 5' _~ n~ ::- _ i;l n ~''<>' ~''>1 ('S' [ '< ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M <: ~ ~ ~/ /.4 ...,.,.;//~~.... ~iI ~Q /.4 /~~:f:'4.~'" /8 _,~ '.1'..{:-'" 24 171 ;;;; , . '>.. ~ 141':<,1 ., 13 >-'~ 2~ 16 r;z1 16 I-- R ~ IT 22 ~ ~ /8 2/ ~; I 9 '20 12 l---~- - ;7 II --11> ~ ..+ 10 ~ <>: ~ :~~~ ~ ,~ " ";;l:" 17 2 "q rD'/~, " i4DLEC'I,.I", T 14 LN N. ~ 0 I , 2ND'" 'on),' · I\~ -::7 ~ -..... \..or I z:.. ~DLAND ~!,12 P"N~ f' ZND 000 --1 2!h 1....('" ADD" ~'74 ~ I ef"'i '5' 71. 1lo!I141,s 31 ~'f.. I . AVE Q~V I---T I "QUICKSTho'M ' . ~ G p 1,:";%" ' 3'". .. .1.wtJfTION ".. :K o~ ~iI S IW.'54 ~ ~ GREEN :....I I;-r;r..-I,.- . ~"'. ,. I : llIJTl.llT ' ~~ 4 ~A,CI~ES ",,",0' < ,;, -:" ' , . I.. . . , . ,',1.**. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,., J"' 4-'"". ~ roT" t'!;;ifi~~w~ : Go~f XJ'~;1 ~ :... ~ ~tfoE: ,\.. '""'" ~Q~::.;f, Vf~'~}~~~ il. . 00~5~~,tCb: \ \ Fj-~-7 -" -- !.. ~ ~ ~ : " "',":'" I ~'.:'f~ ,0 G · ':!tC.J;;I1"< ' '''". ~. i, I't-; . . . .. ' 4 icll~i,~' /. . c IE' .:1. II " ~... ,7 ~ 'Ii ~.' . \.\'. . '3 .= ~lu 10 ~ '(:) -. I~ 'J ~o. '1M LA NW. ''''',014: 1 \20.11.\" 10 1~I'4 :~Izr" .. ~ . 4' , rr ,.., . ~ ,. _ /. ... . . .. .1-" :;-..!.. 13 7 't. 19 ...!!.... ..J ;-- _00 ", U,v Gi. ~ . I I. ~ADD'3~I,lf' 2 'ADi .s:i. 7 \.1ii '4" '1l-;- ~-1>o 7 20J C'-1><'l ~ JRH .. - ~l. J · ~,.. 2 L.JiIrI...'_I." ...:..... 5 """--~ 16 5 ~.~'(21 <""..,." ....... , . . , HA NW ' ~ Id.3 I~. I' .'14171:17 .I.I~" ", 4 ~"T~~").''c'2.~ ,. ~L~ I~ ll: + ..... f4.,,:, r r ~1. .~ A ~ -" ~ " ~ ._ I ~ l -+- "" '.~"!" .' 2. ., 22,'3 ""*'v\20~~3N}.."""II:., ,? 1~/3.4111 '-\7 1124 :1 ~ ~~ · I ~ i:j C 1'..:,. "'-" . .,w I 11210 '0.. 7Id2'120119I'87,7 ~j ~.. J ",2 hlu\"" ~L u. ...... ~ R ~l' ~. .., " -:- ~ . I ~I, 213.!.~" 1~21J3fI4~' U ,I :ijl z?Ii ~ _ ,',!.. :> ~tWa?DU4NO C~--" ~ .J~ · ~ l~'; ~ "7 : ~'..;'~~:~~~tr~'~ em;::;-: ~'- 7 .q~07' 4/~ -:; , l'~'I\C.t",~J.;. C. ~ ~ li4 i - M<<1dow 1 0 ~W "rJ I 2 r'! ,EXCEPTIO"' i:;;!., ~ .. ~ . ~ II CI/un:II A Ii !- ~ = · ~!f%):~ .. ffT7/11/,,:' -I, .. ,:'\ _'O~-': ! v. iLl./ ~ lD/},I '-_'17 I I x: ~ ~t( .,J. b~ -!....( :1 , ...... "l" "1'1' '- 11$ J. 1:: 4:;;J:.. 7; f-7'c~ r/'Tft'<<-.~'" i ~ ~ T I!- ~~ ~~' Ic~".. 'J: . - 07 to"T [)~ Chu",1I 1 '.('..: .~.. J;:\, ~ iD ,. ~H '::10~ '- II ~-,t" ~ --r J /,' I .. 1'.. ...tn." V, =~....., ..1tII .1.1'. ': /I ~; ;". I-~ -/~ ...._ ~ /IAl1Il , oJ 2 ~f~~~'\Pl IJ. . 'It Ie:"'';' u; ~~ 'I 10 II T __c... 1m AV' ;W,...., IS ~J \. ~ . '- _ .,.. 1___. 'A1~ <I ,i' Y I' ..., 'l'ALD.$l.8 '~o. 102 ~ H"'.JI ..., ,:(. Fl'7' ~:I,,::~Ii~.. I~I 10 ~/II ., _ T= ..... I', . ~LW~'I SUB: , ~ ',',.. .N, 4.;;:.,J " ,% 1 ,...- . rT.ilill j ..1.. .I'l,"}:::': :::'}" I. ~ 10 --I + "l C'\ '\~"",.,.,;r.T.. I 4 5~~ , JIl ~~ . ~~ .l::. f1~ 7'>.."" 7:'" 11c:t~~, ~,Il:i~ o.L.A .... . ~ *34 ..!.lm'~ ' , 7 .....:... 3 -. ;+YI ~il i--!- ,..!... fJ. EEsj --' ~ I -I - --=I ~ ~ OUTLOT A ~ CREEKRIDG. ~Z'l ~LD'S .AD?'; - - - frE;- ~... ,- 5 \;'\", I' 1\ , ' I' \ I , \ , . I I \ , ,\ , , I' \ I I' \ ' ,\ ~ '\~L.--____:~-:~i \ , \ \ \ \ \ I \ I " \ . \ \ \ \ , , , 4 ~ I 5 I EST~TES\ I " 1,1,' A: '. ! :1--::"- .. % N ~ (, \ ) Information Summary for Comprehensive Plan Revisions and Plan Amendments This form summarizes key information about your comprehensive plan revision or amendment that the Metropolitan Council needs for its review. Please complete the form as directed below and submit it to the Metropolitan Council with each comprehensive plan revision or amendment. (See Item C, page A74 for a list of the information to be included with your submittal.) t/ NOTE: If your plan amendment is a simple "housekeeping" change, you 'need to complete only Part I of this fonn (uGenerallnfonnation," pages A73-A74). Please be as specific as possible in your answers. If the staff of your local governmental unit prepared a report for your Planning Commission or City Council regarding this plan revision or amendment, please attach it as well, IMPORTANT: Provide complete answers. This fonn is used to enable staff to detennine completeness within 10 days. If the response on the fonn references an attached plan, the reference must include the appropriate page, paragraph(s), tables, maps or figures. If you do not clearly reference where infonnation can be found and Council review staff cannot find it, your plan may mistakenly be considered incomplete. If you would prefer, you may request a diskette of this form (available in WordPerfect 5.1 or 6.1 and in ASCII). You may also submit a reasonable facsimile of this form from your word processing system, , '. Please send plan revision or amendment to: Lynda Voge, Referrals Coordinator Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre 230 E. Fifth Street; St. Paul, MN 55101-1634 I. General Information A. Sponsoring governmental unit City of Andover Name oflocal contact person David Carlberq. Communitv Develo];)mp.nt n;rp.ctor Address 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW. Andover. MN 55304 Telephone number 755-5100 FAX number 755-8923 Internet address (if applicable) NA Name of preparer (if different from contact person) John Hinzman, City Planner Date of preparation 2/13/97 B. Check all that apply and fill in requested information: _ Overall plan revision Name of amendment Adolphson & Peterson Senior Housinq ~ Revision of a plan chapter or element _ "Housekeeping" text change (If so, complete only Part I of this form,) -L Land use change (describe) From RU, Residential Urban Single Family & C, Commercial Size of affected area in acres 9.15 Ac. to RM -2, Residential Multiple Dwelling _ Urban service area expansion (Applies only to amendments submitted before you submit your revised comprehensive plan due in 1998. Page 4.1 describes the information on development staging and timing.) Size of expansion in acres _ Other (please describe) A73 July 1996 J If you are submitting an amendment, briefly describe the amendment: Petition to change the Comprehensive Land Use Plan map designation on a 9.15 acre parcel from RU, Residential Urban & C, CommerClaL to' a newly created RM-2, Residential Multipl.e Dwell1ng dlStn.ct. C. Please attach seven copies of the following: ( 1. Completed Information Summary for Plan Revisions and Plan Amendments form, 2. Your proposed plan revision or amendment. 3. A citywide map showing the location of the proposed change. 4. The current plan map, indicating areas affected by the revision or amendment. 5. The proposed plan map, indicating areas affected by the revision or amendment. ~ NOTE: If your community has access to a geographic information system (GIS) or other automated mapping technology, the Council would appreciate it if you would submit your land use map and staging boundaries in digital form (one copy), in addition to the hard copies you send. The "Arc Export" format is preferred, but we can also use the "DXF" format. Putting this information in digital form will help minimize map discrepancies between your data and data maintained by the Council. D. What is the official local status of the proposed plan revision or amendment? (Check all that apply.) ---1L Acted upon by planning commission (if applicable) on 2/25/97 (date) Approved by governing body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council Review on (date) Considered, but not approved by governing body on (date) Other (Please describe) \ J E. List adjacent local governmental units and other jurisdictions (school districts, watershed districts, etc,) affected by the change that have been sent copies of the plan revision or amendment, if any, and the date the copies were sent to them (required by Minn, Stat. 473,858, Subd. 2). . . Anoka County Highway Department, Coon Creek Watershed DlStnct, Anoka Conservation District, City of Ramsey, City of Oak Grove, City of Ham Lake, City of Blaine, City of Coon Rapids, City of Anoka, Anoka-Hennepin District No. 11. ~ Note: Please review the information requests in the following handbook sections for a . complete description of information to accompany or to be included in your comprehensive plan revision or amendment: Wastewater, page 5.8 Transportation, page 5.1 Aviation, page 5,7 Recreation Open Space, page 5.10 Land Use, page 4,1 Housing, page 4,8 Water Resources, page 4.20 Implementation Program, page 6.1 Water Supply, page 5.11 ,. A74 July 1996 II. Impact on Regional Systems I. I A. Wastewater Treatment 1. Total flow for community based on existing plan: 0.82 million gallons/day (mgd) year 2000; 1.59 mgd year 2010 2. Will the proposed plan revision or amendment result in a change in the projected sewer flows for the community? ~ No - If not, skip to question 7, ' _Yes - Indicate the expected change: 3. Total flow for community based on plan revision or amendment: mgd year 2000; mgd year 2010 4. If your community discharges to more than one metropolitan interceptor, indicate which interceptor will be affected by the revision or amendment. 5. Will flows be diverted from one interceptor service area to another? No _Yes - Describe the change and volumes involved in mgd: 6. Is any wastewater flow an intercommunity flow to an adjoining community's sanitary sewer system? No _Yes - If yes, enclose a copy of the inter-community agreement. 7. Has your community adopted a comprehensive program for the management of on-site septic systems including biennial inspections? No ~Yes _ Not applicable- Please explain: B. Transportation 1. Does this plan revision or amendment potentially increase existing trip generation (use Institute of Transportation Engineers trip-generation manual)? --1L- No - Ifnot, skip to question 3, _Yes - If yes, how much average daily traffic? How much peak hour traffic? 2. Does the existing local and regional road network (including metropolitan interchanges) have the capacity to accommodate planned land use(s)? No -2L-Yes a. If not, will this plan revision or amendment require improvements to local or regional roads or interchanges? No _Yes Specify: Explain who will pay for these improvements: .I A75 July 1996 , I Will these improvements be in place to accommodate the proposed development? No _Yes ( Are these improvements included in a capital improvement program? No _Yes b. Will this plan revision or amendment require implementing traffic demand management (TDM) strategies or land use and urban design measures? -LNo _Yes - If yes, How? (For example, park & rides, flexible work hours, mixed land uses,) 3. Does this plan amendment impact transit service or facilities? X No _Yes - How? 4. Does the proposed plan revision or amendment affect pedestrian or bike systems? No X Yes _ How? Internal trails are planned as part of the senior housing proposal. There is a potential for linkinq this svstem to the proposed regional trail on Bunker Lake Blvd. C. Aviation 1. Do your community's plan or codes/ordinances include a "notification" element to protect regional airspace? ~~ ( _Yes 2. Do the proposed changes in the plan revision or amendment involve areas within an airport influence area or airport search area? -L No - Ifno, skip to "D," "Recreation Open Space." _Yes 3. Are the proposed changes in the plan revision or amendment consistent with guidelines for land use compatibility and aircraft noise guidelines and approved airport Long-term Comprehensive Plan? No Yes -X- Not applicable D. Recreation Open Space 1. Does the plan revision or amendment affect existing or future federal, state or regional parks, park reserves or trails? No X Yes _ If yes, describe: Internal trails are planned as part of the senior housing proposal. There is a potential for linkmg thlS system to the proposed regional trail on Bunker Lake Blvd. 2. Does the plan revision or amendment include a trail segment or connection to a regional trail or park? No ~Yes See attached map A76 July 1996 ill. Impact on Land Use ( A. Plan Revision If you are submitting a plan revision and you are using your own community's land use data, please attach copies of the land use tables you completed on pages AI7-AI8, A37-A39 in the handbook appendix. B. Plan Amendment Questions 1, 2 and 3 below apply only to plan amendments involving a land use change and urban service area expansion. Describe the following, as applicable: 1. For the area in the amendment: a. Existing land uses in acres: Commercial 1.0. Residential 8.15 ac. b. Proposed land uses in acres: Residential Multiple Dwellinq - PUD 9.15 ac. , ) 2. For residential use amendments: a. Number of residential dwelling units and types (single, multi-family) involved under existing plan 16 single Under proposed revision/amendment 140. multi-family b. Density under existing plan. 26 unit$Jhder proposed revision/amendment 15.30 units/acre acre 3. For commercial/industrial/institutional use amendments: a. Square footage of commercial structures under existing plan 0 Under proposed revision/amendment 0 b. Square footage of industrial structures under existing plan 0 Under proposed revision/amendment 0 c. Square footage of institutional structures under existing plan 0 Under proposed revision/amendment 0 d. Number of employees under existing plan' 0 Under proposed revision/amendment 0 IV. Impact on Housing 1. Will the plan revision or amendment affect the availability of affordable or Iife-cycle housing in your community? _ No - Ifno, skip to "V," "Environmental Resources," ---1L- Y es If this change favorably affects your community's ability to achieve housing goals under the Livable Communities Act or goals stated in the housing element of your comprehensive plan, please describe: The chanqe will enable construction of life-cycle housing to meet the needs of a rapidly growing senior population. If this change negatively affects your community's ability to meet your housing goals, what provision has your community made to compensate for this impact? v. Environmental Resources 1. Will an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) be prepared for the plan revision or amendment? ---1L- No _Yes - If yes, what is the schedule for completion of the EA W? , 2. Does the plan revision or amendment affect a state, federal or locally protected wetland? J --x-No _Yes - If yes, please include a map showing the location of the wetland, Describe the type of wetland A77 July 1996 affected and how it wilI be protected or how impacts will be mitigated. ( / 3. Will the plan revision or amendment potentially affect the quality of any surface water body? --1L- No Yes Identify which ones and describe the impacts: Indicate how any negative impacts wilI be mitigated: 4. Has the community adopted the Council's Interim Strategy to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution to All Metropolitan Water Bodies? No ~Yes - If yes, has the community implemented the strategy? No X Yes 5. Does the plan revision or amendment affect the Mississippi River Critical Area planning standards and the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area Comprehensive Management Plan? ---X...- No _Yes. Describe: _ Not Applicable .' 6. Does your community have an adopted water supply plan that meets the requirements of Chapter 186 of 1993 Session Laws? _ Not Applicable No --X..- Yes - If yes, wilI the proposed plan revision or plan amendment affect your water supply plan? X No Yes - If yes, how? ( 7. Has your community adopted a local surface water management plan? No ---1L-Yes - If yes, will the proposed plan revision or plan amendment affect your local surface water management plan? X No Yes - If yes, how? VI. Implementation Program 1. Will the plan revision or amendment require changes in zoning, subdivision, on-site sewer ordinances or other official controls? No --LYes - If yes, when? ASAP Describe proposed changes: Zoninq chanqe from R-4. Single Family Urban & SC. Shopping Center to M -2. Multiple Dwellinq (PUD). J 2. Has your community adopted a capital improvements program? -2LNo _Yes - If yes, what changes will be needed in your community's capital improvement program to implement the plan revision or amendment? (, " A78 July 1996 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION t>n HRA Meeting ITEM t>n Public Hearing Award 1997 CDBG Funds Public Service Agencies 1. Request DATE March 4, 1997 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning John Hinzman City Planner -jWY\ APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: The Andover Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is requested to determine how the 1997 Public Service pool funds are to be awarded to public or social service agencies requesting funding. The City has allocated $30,000 to this project, however agency requests exceed that amount, totaling $44,037, The HRA is asked to determine how the $14,037 shortfall will be cut. Staff recommends funding only those agencies allotted funds during the previous year, totaling $31,037. The remaining $1,037 deficiency would be deducted from those agencies requesting funds higher than their 1996 allocation, Deductions would be determined based on the percentage increase between 1996 allocations and 1997 requests. Following is a list of requests by social service organizations, 1996 allocations, and staff proposed allocation amounts, as well as the applications for funds, describing the organizations activities, , I Organization Alexandra House Anoka County Brotherhood Council Anoka County Community Action Program ARC of Anoka and Ramsey Counties Community Emergency Assistance Program Family Life Mental Health Center North Anoka Meals on Wheels North Suburban Counseling Center Northwest Suburban Kinship Nucleus Clinic Opportunity Services Rise TOTAL MOTION BY: 1997 Request $2,000 $2,500 $6,804 $2,500 $4,500 $4,000 $3,733 $3,500 $2,500 $3,000 $5,000 $4,000 $44,037 SECOND BY: 1996 Allocation $3,000 $0 $5,869 $0 $3,500 $3,878 $3,733 $3,500 $2,520 $0 $0 $4,000 $30,000 Staff . Proposal . $2,000 $0 $6,334 $0 $3,999 $3,934 $3,733 $3,500 .' $2,500 $0 $0 $4,000 $30,000 . , / CITY OF ANDOVER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDING REQUEST FORM PROJECT YEAR 1997-1998 Community Development Block Grant funds are available to organizations that provide special services to low to moderate income individuals and families. The City of Andover receives CDBG funds through Anoka County and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. The application deadline is February 21,1997. Funds will be awarded at the City CouncillHRA meeting on Tuesday, March 4, 1997 at 7:00 pm at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Blvd. NW, Additional information may be obtained from John Hinzman, City Planner at 755-5100 (TDD 754-8826). Name of Organization Alexandra House, Inc. , Address P. O. Box 49039 Phone 780-2332 Blaine. MN 55449 / Contact Person Pat Prinzevalle Title Executive Director Please describe your organization's goals and programs, and how they will benefit Andover residents: Alexandra House, Inc., provides 24 hour temporary emergency shelter"support services and community advocacy to battered women and their children/youth in Anoka County. Our mission is to eliminate domestic violence by ensuring accountability for our community while providing support services to battered women and their children/youth through: safe temporary shelter; crisis intervention; individual and systems advocacy support networks; education for battered women and their children/youth; and community education. The following services are emergency shelter. support groups. volunteer involvement, professional training, h~~l~h care ~ervices. intervention services and an emergency food shelf. Services will benefit Andover residents by providing services that can assist families in living violence free lives. Attach additional sheets. if necessary. ************************************************************************ / Amount of CDBG funds requested S 2,000 J !lag\: :2 CDSG R~qu~st Form City of Andover Name of Organization Alexandra House. Inc.. Special Project Description: We are reQuestine CDBG fund~ to pay for thp ro~~ of prnvi~ing pmprgpnry shelter, support services and community advocacy. In 1996 services were provided to 345 residents of the City of Andover. These services include: emer~ency shelter, crisis intervention phone lines. violence prevention services, intervention services, childcare. teen advocacy. general advocacy including legal, welfare. housing. walk in support and support groups Does your Organization serve low to moderate income families or individuals? If you answer no, your organization will not receive funding. X Yes No What percentage of persons served are low/moderate income individuals? 90 % ; / Does your organization currently serve residents of Andover? X Yes No Has your organization served Andover residents in the past? X-- Yes No Will these funds be used for the expansion of an existing program? Yes y No Will these funds be used for the creation of a new program? _Yes y No PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWI~G INFOR.\>fA TION WITH YOUR APPLlCA TIO~: x 1997 Or!!anization Bud!!et - - x Proposed Budget for CDSG Funds ~ Schedule for Expenditure of CDSG Funds July 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998 j ---1L Name(s) ofindividual(s} authorized to receive CDBG reimbursement ch~cks. Pat Prinzevalle, Executive Director CITY OF ANDOVER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CD~<PT Y FUNDING REQUEST FORM PROJECT YEAR 1997-1998 RECEIVE:: FEB 141997 , OF ANDOVER Community Development Block Grant funds are available to organizations that provide special services to low to moderate income individuals and families. The City of Andover receives CDBG funds through Anoka County and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. The application deadline is February 21,1997. Funds will be awarded at the City CouncillHR.A. meeting on Tuesday, March ~. 1997 at 7:00 pm at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Blvd, NW. Additional information may be obtained from John Hinzman, City Planner at 755-5100 (TDD 754-8826). NameOfOrgani~tion~ (~ ~-~U~~ Address:;' 10 / ~ 9..;6. /J;)fJ AJ 0 Phone tjj t2 - 0 0 i./ (p , IJ/!.JO ~ wAJ 8J3CJ 3 Contact Person CD ..h ~-P G 1) ~ TitleJ'l1~ Please describe your organization's goals and programs, and how they will benefit Andover residents: Attach additional sheets. if necessary. ******************************************************.***************** -, ,I "a'~ frO Amount ofCDBG funds requested $ S 00.- / , J Page 2 CDBG Request Form City of Andover If: ~ Name of Organization 1\ J . \ C~~,&~~~ (f- Special Project Description: ~~ ~~~. ~:;!:;;-i;,/f}5:::;. Does your Organization serve low to moderate income families or individuals? If you answer no, your organization will not receive funding. t:-- Yes What percentage of persons served are low/moderate income individuals? No J~ % , , Does your organization currently serve residents of Andover? :t.-Yes No Has your organization served Andover residents in the past? ~Yes No / Will these funds be used for the expansion of an existing program? "X--Yes No Will these funds be used for the creation of a new program? Yes A-NO PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION Willi YOUR APPLICATION: 1997 Organization Budget Proposed Budget for CDBG Funds Schedule for Expenditure ofCDBG Funds Name(s) ofindividual(s) authorized to receive CDBG reimbursement checks. ,- CY~ WJ~ ~ 1t~8C!. 9~- '\ J RECEI""" FEB 191~~{ CITY OF ~"DOVER r: 'TY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CD~G OF ANu\.:,:~ R FUNDING REQUEST FORM PROJECT YEAR 1997-1998 NAME OF ORGANIZATION Anoka Countv Communitv Action Proqram, Inc. ADDRESS 1201 89th Avenue NE #345 PHONE 783-4741 Blaine, MN 55434 CONTACT PERSON Cathev Weidmann TITLE Coordinator of Senior Proqrams & Volunteer Services PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR ORGANIZATION'S GOALS AND PROGRAMS: "The mission of Anoka County Community Action, Inc. is to be a catalyst in creating tools and opportunities for, and. ~TT1powering lower income Anoka County residents to achieve their aspirations. and dreams." This agency "'\ttempts to assist people who are economically disadvantaged or who have ,.ther limitations to become or remain self-sufficient. The Senior Outreach Program is a part of this larger mission by assisting Andover clients in accessing supportive services which help them remain in their homes in a healthier and safer. manner through nutritional, medical and social programs. *************************************************************************** AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED $ 6,804.00 SPECIFIC PROJECT DESCRIPTION:. The Senior Outreach Worker identifies and meet with vulnerable and isolated seniors and disabled aduJts, assisting them in obtaining financial, nutritional, social, and medical'services. These often include food programs, Public Health Nursing, chore services, medical assistance, energy assistance, etc. Due to physical or mental limitations, mobility problems or intimidation of the system, clients often need special assistance with paperwork completion or advocacy. The Outreach Worker is able to act as a case manager with clients and assists them in seeking long term solutions. , ) ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM, INC, \ ) Does your Organization serve low to moderate income families or individuals? _~_Yes No What percentage of persons served are low/moderate income individuals? 84 % Does your organization currently serve residents of Andover? x Yes No Has your organization served Andover residen~s in the past? X Yes ~- No Will these funds be used for the expansion of an existing program? x Yes No PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WITH YOU~ APPLICATION: ':;:nclosed , ) Enclosed Enclosed 1997 Organization Budget Proposed Budget for CDBG Funds Schedule for Expenditure of CDBG Funds Name{s) of individual{s} authorized to receive CDBG reimbursement checks. Enclosed " / ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM, INC, \ I I CITY OF ANDOVER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK (CDBG) FUNDING REQUEST FORM PROJECT YEAR 1997-1998 Community Development Block Grant funds are available to organizations that provide special services to low to moderate income individuals and families. The City of Andover receives CCBG funds through Anoka County and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. The application deadline is February 21,1997. Funds will be awarded at the City CouncillHRA meeting on Tuesday, March 4, 1997 at 7:00 pm at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Blvd. NW Additional information may be obtained from John Hinzman, City Planner at 755-5100 (TDD 754-8826) Name of Organization: Arc of Anoka & Ramsey Counties Address: 1201 89th Avenue NE Suite # 305 Phone: 783-4958 Blaine. MN 55343 , \ , / Contact Person: Marianne Reich Kent Campbell Title: Executive Director Title: Director of Development Please describe your organization's goals and programs, and how they will benefit Andover residents: Arc of Anoka and Ramsey Counties is an advocacy organization consisting of people with developmental disabilities, parents, professionals and concerned citizens of the communities we serve. The agency has a membership of over 1,000 and serves over 15,000 people yearly. Arc of Anoka and Ramsey Counties is committed to building inclusive communities and providing advocacy and support for people with developmental disabilities and their families. Developmental disabilities include conditions such as mental retardation, autism, and cerebral palsy. Arc provides an array of programs such as Toy and Adaptive Equipment Library; Affordable Housing Program; Leisure Camperships; Support Groups; Individual and Systems advocacy; information and referral; and community awareness programs. Attach additional sheets, if necessary. ** '*********************************************************************** . / Amount of CDBG funds requested $ 2,500 Page 2 "3G Request Form . , l..1.ty of Andover Name: Arc of Anoka & Ramsey Counties Special Project Description: Funds will be used to support the most essential services offered to residents of Anoka County and specifically the City of Andover. These services encompass a wide range of activities including leisure services, information and referral services; family support; one-to-one advocacy and problem solving with adults with disabilities and the Toy and Adaptive Equipment Lending Library. Arc has over 500 members in Anoka County and provides services to an estimated 800 to 1,000 people in the county. Approximately 100 people from the City of Andover use Arc services. Does your organization serve low to moderate income families or individuals? If you answer no, your organization is not eligible to receive CDBG funds. Yes What percentage of persons served are low/moderate income individuals? Estimated at 20 to 40% . , y.,uJ.t percentage of low/moderate income persons served are Ramsey residents? Estimated at 20 to 40% Will these funds be used for an expansion of an existing program? X YES NO Will these funds be used for the creation of a new program? YES X NO PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WITH YOUR APPLICATION: ~1997 Organization Budget ~Proposed Budget for CDBG Funds X Schedule for Expenditure of CDBG Funds ~Name of Individual(s) authorized to receive CDBG Reimbursement Checks V ~ianne Reich; Executive Director I x A copy of the organization's articles of incorporation \. / CITY OF ANDOVER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDING REQUEST FORM PROJECT YEAR 1997-1998 Community Development Block Grant funds are available to organizations that provide special services to low to moderate income individuals and families. The City of Andover receives CDBG funds through Anoka County and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. The application deadline is February 21,1997. Funds will be awarded at the City CouncillHRA meeting on Tuesday, March 4, 1997 at 7:00 pm at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Blvd. NW. Additional information may be obtained from John Hinzman, City Planner at 755-5100 (TDD 754-8826). Name of Organization COllllllunity Emergency Assistance Program, Inc. CEAP Address 1201 89th Avenue NE Suite 130 Phone 783-4930, 566-9600 Blaine, MN 55434 7231 Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center MN 55429 \ / Contact Person Karen Neis Title Director of Administration Darleen Simon Site Manager-Blaine Please describe your organization's goals and programs, and how they will benefit Andover residents: (See Attached) SERVICES: FOOD SHELF-Families recelve food to meet basic needs. Priority given to families with dependent children. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE- These funds used to help pay for transportation, school, work-related, child care, uncovered medical, emergency electric, emergency rent, and other emer- gency related expenses. CLOTHING CLOSET - Families throughout the Twin Cities may use the Closet, There is a wide variety of children's, as well as adult clothing. The Closet is free. REFERRAL- CEAP also acts a referral source for other agencies and services. CEAP collaborates with many other community and government agencies in order to ensure that clients' needs are fulfilled. This will be even more important in the wake of welfare reform. Attach additional sheets, if necessary. ************************************************************************ "- I Amount of CDBG funds requested $ 4,500 '. J Page: 2 CDBG Request Form City of Andover Name of Organization Community Emergency Assistance Program, Inc. (CEAP) Special Project Description: See attachments. Does your Organization serve low to moderate income families or individuals? If you answer no, your organization will not receive funding. xx Yes No What percentage of persons served are low/moderate income individuals? 100 % / Does your organization currently serve residents of Andover? ~Yes No Has your organization served Andover residents in the past? xx Yes - No Will these funds be used for the expansion of an existing program? _Yes xx No Will these funds be used for the creation of a new program? Yes - xx No PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING fNFOR.\ilA TION WITH YOUR APPLlCA nON: \ ) x x x x 1997 Organization Budget Proposed Budget for CDBG Funds Schedule for Expenditure ofCDBG Funds Name(s) ofindividualls) authorized to receive CDBG reimbursement checks. FEB-21-1997 16:29 FAMILY LIFE MENTAL HEALTH 612+427+7976 P.02 \ ; CITY OF ANDOVER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDING REQUEST FORM PROJECT YEAR 1997-1998 Cummunity Development Blo<:k Grant funds are available to organizations that provide special services to low to moderate income individuals and families. The City of Andover rec~ives COBO funds through Anoka County and the United. States Department of HllUSing and Urban DevdQPlllrnt. The application deadline is February 21,1991. Funds will be awarded at the City CouncillHRA meeting on Tu~day, Man:h 4, 1991 at 7:00 pm at th~ Qalk View Middle School. 1 $400 Hanson Blvd. NW. Additional information may be obtained from John Hinzman, City Plann~r at 755.5100 (TDD 754-8826). Name of~anization FAMILY LIFE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER Address 1428 FIFTH AVE S Phone 427-7964 '. I ANOKA MN 55303 ConmctPernon BOB SULLIVAN Title DIRECTOR Please describe your organi7.ation's gools and programs, and how they will benefit Andover tC$idents: The goal of Family Life Mental Health Center is to provide the full array of quality outpatient mental health services to those in need without regard to income. Also, see attached. In the 1995-96 F.Y., we provided services to 106 persons/families who listed their residence as Andover, most were low income and were treated for chronic problems of mental health which improved their ability to function at home, work, school or community. A ttach additional sheets. if necessary - ..................**...................*...................~.........*.. , ) Amount ofCDBG funds requested $ 4,000.00 r~~-21-1997 16:29 FAMILY LIFE !'ENTAL HEALTH 612+427+7976 P. 03 ,......X.;..I_. , , ; Pagl:2 CUB<.i RCl]\I.:st Form City of AIIl.1o"'~r N:1mc ofOrl1.:lJ!i7alion _.~AMILY. .PFE..~ENTA~, fJEALf:H CE:NTER Spt.'I;ial PmJ\.~t Description: In t~e 1997-96 F.Y., we are requeeting $4,000.00. $2,000 _t.o be. u_sed !,-~ sUbc'idiz~ :~-;re f~r lo~ -:i'~~~~~di6abie~ residents of 'Andov~r:;an~ -~OO )o--as.sist in upgr~crrng"o1ir outda~ed data processing .~nd ~~P~~~y's~e~~o ~~_:esid~n~s ...!!!ore efficien~~y. Does your Oqpl1izatiotl ~er\'l;: low ItllllodelOlle inclllm: filmilie. III il1l.h\'iduals? II' you anSWt:'r no. yuur organiLulion will Dol receive funding. X Yt:s Nu What percentage (If ~rs()11.' :OC'I,,"cd arl: low/moderate' im:om~ imliYillual:>7 'for: ._% , DoC's yClur oq;lani:(.<!liol1 ~ulTl:llll)' lit:f\'~ n::slllenl!> of An,lllv~r" / -LYe::; _No Hils YOllr organizatioI1 scrwd AndtlvCI rcsidellt:. ill the p.1,~t? _u .X, Y l:S 'fO --"" Will these fumb be: u...cd {Of the l:~pllmj(ln lJfUlIl:xil>lIllg prlJlll'anf? _Ye:: __.f. Nn Willlhcse fl1nd~ be m~d for the crcati"l1 (If:\ W~UI pwgram'? _Yes -LoN 0 I'Lf.ASE I'ROVJDE fHt ~OLLUWING INFOM.1A nor-: WJTJl YOUR API'L1CA lIUN: _.._. t 997 Orgnmo::\\lI\ln l3uJ):ct _ Prnpu"".J RlIllgt!1 t,)( CDH<,; J:llml" _._ Sche:dule: for Expenditure l1f CDBG F Wlds _ r-Iamc(s) of individu;1!fs) 3uth<.lrize:d III n:c:civl: CDBG relmburscment \:l1c\:ks. ) Jean Brownell Carol Reugs TOTAL P,03 RECEIVED \ FEB031997 / CITY OF ANDOVER COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENTBLOCKGRANT(CD~TY OF ANDOVER FUNDING REQUEST FORM PROJECT YEAR 1997-1998 Community Development Block Grant funds are available to organizations that provide special services to low to moderate income individuals and families. The City of Andover receives CDBG funds through Anoka County and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. The application deadline is February 21,1997. Funds will be awarded at the City CouncillHRA meeting on Tuesday, March 4,1997 at 7:00 pm at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Blvd. NW. Additional information may be obtained from John Hinzman, City Planner at 755-5100 (roD 754-8826). Name of Organization North Anoki'l Mp"',, n" l.Jhpp' " AddresslS62 Viking Blvd. .Cedar. <;<;011 Phone 1.11.-fd 17 J Contact Personwaggi Ngnak Title ni rp,.t-nr Please describe your organization's goals and programs, and how they will benefit Andover residents: North Annk:1. Mp;:l'~ on tJ'hpI201c: C::P.,."7PC:: 'hn~J "l1"',...;r;n"~"y "";ll'i'tl~tid. mQ~lf: 1:0 the homebolln" pl nprl Y ::Inn n::.nni ~::tppprl in Anrln'\TClT" ~n":' iUrrQ.nHii.ng communities. These meals meet the requirement of one third of thpir daily nutrition,,' rpquirp",p"t- UP "l"n <:hp'<:,k gR gur slients BE. a ,4 !:I'; 1~,. b4f:ie 3.REI ae l'ef(::ral~ wln::::u. U.t;;:~t:.::S~dry. Attach additional sheets, if necessary. ************************************************************************ / Amount ofCDBG funds requested $ 3,733 , \ I Pag\: 2 COSG Request Form City of Andover Name of Organization North Anoka Meals on Wheels Special Project Description: }Torta ^nok:i MQ:ll~ OR WhQQ1~ i:Qr"Qi: primarily the elQ<>rly o"er 60 years of aie and the under 60 handicaooed. one nutrtionallv balanced meal per day. We serve meals 5 days per week Monday thru Friday nn ~PP~pnrl~ n~ hnli~~y~ u~ m~~~ f~n7pn mp~'Q ~'T~i'~h'p fn? ~~no~ days. Does your Organization serve low to moderate income families or individuals? If you answer no, your organization will not receive funding. --X- Yes No What percentage of persons served are low/moderate income individuals? '\ .I 85 % Does your organization currently serve residents of Andover? --:L...- Yes No Has your organization served Andover residents in the past? --X- Yes No Will these funds be used for the expansion of an existing program? -X....- Yes No Will these funds be used for the creation of a new program? Yes - l[ No PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFOR.\-IA TION WITH YOUR APPLlCA TION: , , X 1997 Organization Budget + Proposed Budget for COSG Funds Schedule for Expenditure ofCOSG Funds 'I Name(s) ofindividuahsl authorized to receive COSG reimbursement checks. J RECEIVED FEB 111997 CITY OF ANDOVER CITY OF ANDOVE. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDING REQUEST FORM PROJECT YEAR 1997-1998 Community Development Block Grant funds are available to organizations that provide special services to low to moderate income individuals and families. The City of Andover receives CDBG funds through Anoka County and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. The application deadline is February 21,1997. Funds will be awarded at the City Council/HRA meeting on Tuesday, March 4, 1997 at 7:00 pm at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Blvd. NW, Additional information may be obtained from John Hinzman, City Planner at 755-5100 (TDD 754-8826). Name of Organization North Suburban Counseling Center Address 425 Coon Rapids Boulevard Phone 784-3008 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 / Contact Person Jacky Baker Title Director Please describe your organization's goals and programs, and how they will benefit Andover residents: This agency has been providing out-patient mental health services in Anoka County for 24 years. The problems most often treated are depression. anxiety. rela- tionship problems and childrens' behavior problems. Our goal is to provide high quality, affordable and timely services which include individual, couple and family counseling as well as psychiatric evaluation and medication management for persons with serious mental illness. Our goal is to enable people to function more successfully within their families and communities and on their ;obs. Attach additional sheets. if necessary. ************************************************************************ ) Amount of CDBG funds requested S 3,500.00 , , I I'agl: :2 CDBG R~quest Form City of Andover Name of Organization North Suburban Counseling Center Special Project Description: To provide counseling and psychiatric services to Andover residents. We will utilize funds from Andover to enable uninsured and underinsured and low income persons to attend counseling. The client will be responsible for a payment based on gross household income and number of dependents. Thiss a~ency is a provider for many insurance companies as well as Medical Assistance and MNCare and any possible payment from any third party payor will be diligently .....oursued 60 su.bsi.dize thll low income counsel:Lng ,1}rogram . . uoes your rgamzaflon serve lOW 10 moaerate mcomelamllles'Or malVlduals? If you answer no, your organization will not receive funding. x Yes No What percentage of persons served are low/moderate income individuals? 100 % Does your organization currently serve residents of Andover? ----X..- Y es No Has your organization served Andover residents in the past? ___Yes No Will these funds be used for the expansion of an existing program? Yes -1L-No Will these funds be used for the creation of a new program? Yes y No PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOllOWING rNFOIU..IA TION WITH YOUR APPLICA TION: 1997 Organization Budget Proposed Budget for CDBG Funds -included within the Organization Budget Schedule for Expenditure of CDBG Funds - included within the Organization Name(s) ofindividual(s) authorized to receive CDBG reimbursement checks. Jacky Baker, Director Budget ; i. ,'" ~.., ,;r)i":;\}Ci':; RECEIVED : -, -Ii 'r II :;\jL 1 Y r-,I i"li DE \i E: L.. fJ !:::' 1':"1 E:. r',~ 'i' ::':i I ._ "M' . I', .... ',':~: !,::-.' !,-. ; I j F7 :~3 T !::;' Ci j ~-:- ~.. ,l (.: r:~ I :".11": , .. ::; :::;. f~'i :....j ~i' ( r::D'j"~':;'.: FEB 201997 J >(j , ,:: i::J, 'j' E~:' ..... i:". ".., ~..., ..'.',..:..... CITY OF ANDOVER ('::. "i "':';:'"! ; ,i .~, i. .. .'i".':,', \...' ..~ ......". ." .....'-.._.. .. .'., :.;.-: ;--,;."i: ... :.:.1" ':'.i:;..." : ,....i,.. ':";;"'.:'i, < '. :', .: i_~, .... ....: . ;.J:...: ,'M' "):.... :";;,::ini',;:' .M,._'__,'_'. ' ;"". '.-i',' "ii'..!. '.J! : ., ..- ,- ;:::' ;,~::. ;'''::.:; ;:Ji" j 1.,_,_,.'.. ..' ;-', ", "....--. '.J'I._, ,_.I '.... ;-, I, ._ i':::i ;._,;- F 1 (-=.;' i. '.:::- ~.:.: c~ ::::.~ -:~:. C j'- l h;:? ~'-4 ,~. i. .t ~~~ ~:.-:: n E' 'r . '-- "_'-1 ,':00 i"J. ;:~ (1 i :,;:: .::\ t .1. (] 11 -"-/C,Ui-'-, ~_ r'e'~.l C e;-j -:.:: ':-;.:; ~ :;.. ,': ;rr"',dC-"/j=:r- "1,_, q;':j'::;\ .~.,-i,: ; cJ p'!"-Oqi :'-.;'; "C;i,-, i i"1~? r.ICJ r- t: hv~es t :3 u !:.:i 1..,'. f- ;J .-=:.; n Kin':"3:'l.l p !=' r'-G~] r'- diTi '::;0. i l ..c. -:2n..:!';::.:-"!:1. i::ij' .:~ ;".::::';.m tj'-iEt ': s. e V" V 1:3 '::-; 'iOU -!::h 3-.17 .;;.1f1d their'- -rami 1 i::e'3 '" ~i~5hip_~~~~~~~~~~~_9 ----- ~-.- ,:,1': 'C~ 1M..... \..'... ,:':;if1;,::!: r ;"~:i. t:?n d'::;;""!.i P ;t through ;'-j.::.;1\,." .1.n::,:] .;,i"-' ,:'JdL 1 t s p~--:::r: d tirf<2 d!Jinq th,i.i~;i;1":::' i:::h{";."."; i- , f .L '::...~n :<.1 r;.::; ~-, .:_ :...i CJ -f'f;;:'2 j""-':;; ~'1 . . '....... CiU,':3':.f-ii:::.';::.'::;;. lnf::i-' .t:c (- ';j..,-:::; .\/ l.eE: 'j" Ci I""' \" ,:::',_\ :.: ,n ~ .~ "- -: ..,.. '.- ~ .... .',:;} ....;., '..;i.,:;\ 'j ~':: ~~::. 1.' .:' "-/.::-u 1-,... '.-' , :_1;.... i. 1 i..... ;"'i ":-::'::::.-,::t ;:,::oC~ ::.-:;(--: .i::'::': ......... '....,.. ;-,,: :,::,'n :::!:_: (' ";.~ .~.:.: i"l~~',=.(.:::' i"'i:::,~: f'; ,.. ~... ", '... .'j..:.;,;,'..-"" j';;':'l l i"'\:'.~ '~ <:: j' , " I ":'::-;.: ,'f! ' V,.j;"'i,:"'::" ..1._, ",., "_'ii.:::'.;, ;:;.I"'il:'::,:':'::' ii .. ... .:;:' '-::. ; .~ " .:':..:.:,...'. " ;,__;, ;':.7 '::.~ , ,-.' ': ,:Jrn:n,: .....::;{.'{ ;-'::t" ':.:;:.:i'~i'l.:a,g,? Dr !:.Jr::?i'''':::,i~:;n:::.:; ';;et'-\l2C 3.i"-:? lClfJ/rncd.:.:?i-ati::0 .,-:;1..:.,..:" 17.._ to':7:'.;" '-' .. ,t.';'..J " "'.'j'. r. . 'f'."-;'.:'f'. :n:'nij" ..i_ f"i cj __L ,/ .1. d l.,':.. . !. ~;:> . Does your organization currerltlv serve residents C:J'r Al'1dover H..:;;.':::, ;--.t;": . I ; ~,.., ;..'--- .1_;::.:': ':::ii ('\ '....:-, ," ;""" ,: ...: ,..i' ....;..::'.I! ,.'_ ':_':::'. '....<-.'_'.; './c,L( '-:'.f i .._ '\Ii'~', C} ;1 "'CH) ;m 'J ,". '~/'CjU;:" c ;,,"q,:.~,n 1.:z. .;::;'( t.:l. C;"; ';-":f:7!::::i.-":.:" : L\' : '_I ,__ '..;-....i ,J,;i"i '-:;(:?i" (ii CJ I:j :~.? i.... ...;. _._ 1. .....,;..\; i ; " 'j] :';?,i"": ~:. ,:.:.:'. i., ;"""1 ~~ 77 h. .~/ F~ S ...... '-:.-:: !~l p.~nd(:../E?:--.. '..) ; ,'ii ',7::' 1'.1.-. !'.;:..J ..,;:::.: i.J .:::-" :~'. ,..Ji ;; -.,. I ::.; F?CJ"_..' : .r~.~r~- F'CI.. :.~.CL..!:;: i....l::::~: I r\lj:::.J':;;~.:~'.'i:; r T C::I"-..' t..:.;.r ....1.... ....L.., .. 1" ~..!' i..,.:,.,..,.::.. ::::; c: h E:;< '.::; i. ~ : 1:::' ~J '..' '., .. . , .i. .:~ c, '. c :..... i.:jl...:.r::iq;,..;!':. l -r \ 1 'M" ~.. 'c::3 ("i..:.j".'i .- ., '. : ;':.~': ; I L 'j" t 1,.:' .:, .~:';"in '7::;' ,Pj L. .. .... .... ..~ I i_I i':':.';._.;-. .~. Cj 1'""" [);:.:.:-:nd.i tu,: .._ J~Jly 1997 to JL:r10 1998 .::)U .C.;".:C I ...., ... t.' ; CD E.: C? fl..\riU.::::. ~ !-. 1._ .. ~~ i '.~ .::t i I: '::: --..----.---------~-.----..-----________M____ i..j ; .7.. nci.1. LCJi:.=:. DC..iDd\' Ldl. .:::\ .~ ,':J.J...t .;:hCi;.'~.i zed .t:o f-,~.?C;:;:':' - -,-.-- -, .. .1.-."_.:';,:;', .. '.- ... ,- . . i._ii!-;-;:'i._.:-. -----------------------..--.---.---------.---.--------.------ / 1_ .:<Li.._i. C.l. Dit'''ector-. C.'.,h. . ,.:,'.j - l..... \ ) RECEIVED FEB 181997 CITY OF ANDOVER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBGj TY OF AN DOVE R FUNDING REQUEST FOlUvl PROJECT YEAR 1997-1998 Community Development Block Grant funds are available to organizations that provide special services to low to moderate income individuals and families. The City of Andover receives CDBG funds through Anoka County and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. The application deadline is February 21,1997. Funds will be awarded at the City Council/HRA meeting on Tuesday, March ",1997 at 7:00 pm at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Blvd, NW, Additional information may be obtained from John Hinzman, City Planner at 755-5100 (TDD 754-8826). Name of Organization Nucleus Clinic Address 1323 Coon Rapids Blvd. Phone 755-5300 \ Coon Rapids, MN. 55433 Contact Person Jerri Loughry T~e Clinic Manager Please describe your organization"s goals and programs, and how they will benefit Andover residents: p'~~qp q~~ ~~~~~npn ~npp~~ Attach additional sheets. if necessary. ************************************************************************ .' Amount of CDBG funds requested S S" 0 0 0 . " ) Page .2 CDBG R~quest Form City of Andover Name of Organization Nucleus Clinic Sp~cial Proj~ct Description: See attached narrative Does your Organization serve low to moderate income families or individuals? If you answer no, your organization will not receive funding. -*- Y es No \\!hat percentage of persons served are low/moderate income individuals? 100 % Does your organization currently serve residents of Andover? ----X- Y es No Has your organization served Andover residents in the past? X Yes No Will these funds be used for the expansion of an existing program? Yes x No Will these funds be used for the creation of a new program? Yes x No PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOW(1'G INFORMATION \V1TH YOUR APPLICA TION: X 1997 Organization Budget ~ Proposed Budget for CDBG Funds ~ Schedule for Expenditure ofCDBG Funds ~ Name(s) of individuahs) authorized to receive CDBG reimbursement checks. / To: City of Andover ) From: Jerri Loughry ~ Manager, Nucleus Clinic Re: CDBG Funding Date: February 14, 1997 " I would like to take this opportunity to introduce you to Nucleus Clinic. Nucleus Clinic is a public nonprofit family planning clinic currently located in Coon Rapids. The clinic provides low cost medical services to teens and young adults in areas such as family planning services and education, pregnancy testing, and testing and treatment for sexually transmitted diseases. The clinic began providing services in November 1971, Over 16,000 people have received medical services at Nucleus Clinic since that time. In September 1976 Nucleus Clinic moved into the Family Service Center building, owned by the city of Coon Rapids, where it is located today. The clinic is open four nights per week, plus one to five afternoons per month, In 1996 the clinic provided services for 1394 unduplicated clients, of which 159 were residents of Andover, The total number of client visits for 1996, which includes first visit plus subsequent visits, was 2828, The target population served at the clinic is women between the ages of thirteen and twenty-three who are considered to be low income and at an increased risk for unplanned pregnancy, Their male partners are also provided medical services, Clients older than twenty-three are seen if they fall within the low income guidelines, Over 70% of the clients seen at Nucleus Clinic are at or below 100% of the poverty level. All clients are requested to pay a small fee for their services, though clients are not refused services based on their inability to pay, In 1996 the clinic implemented a sliding fee scale as part of its grant requirement. This means that the majority of the clients seen at Nucleus Clinic qualify for free services, with a recommended donation of $12, This change will significantly impact the amount of revenue received through patient fees; the revenue received from patient fees supplements the budget in the area of personal services, which provides for nurse practitioners, clinic coordinators, and lab technicians, J '\ I Current funding for the clinic comes from two sources; a federal Maternal Child Health (MCH) grant supplies the majority of the funding, with a state Family Planning Special Projects (FPSP) grant supplying the rest. The City of Coon Rapids currently provides in-kind support to the clinic in the form of rent, utilities, and administrative support. The funds received from COBG would help cover the costs of direct patient medical and educational services for low income Andover residents, 1997 BUDGET Expenditures Personal Services Charges & Services Supplies Capital Outlay 1997 131,289 29,670 16,820 Activity Total 177,779 Related Revenue 1997 , Anoka County Grant Clinic Fees State of MN (FPSP Grant) 78,885 36,000. 51 293 Total Revenue 166,178 · This reflects an estimate based on previous years revenue, The current sliding fee schedule will result in a decrease of clinic fees, The goal of the clinic is to continue to provide quality medical care and educational services to young women and their partners with regard to birth control, unplanned pregnancy, and sexually transmitted diseases, and to increase community awareness of Nucleus Clinic services. Nucleus Clinic requests funds in the amount of $3000 from the COBG, which will subsidize the cost of services to approximately 165 Andover residents at the rate of $18,00 per patient. Information on patient residence will be provided to Anoka County on a monthly basis, Thank you for your consideration, " , / ') / RECEIVED FEe 0,* 1997 CITY OF ANDOVER CITY OF AN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) DOVER FUNDING REQUEST FORM PROJECT YEAR 1997-1998 Community Development Block Grant funds are available to organizations that provide special services to low to moderate income individuals and families. The City of Andover receives CDBG funds through Anoka County and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. The application deadline is February 21,1997. Funds will be awarded at the City CouncillHRA meeting on Tuesday, March 4, 1997 at 7:00 pm at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Blvd. NW. Additional information may be obtained from John Hinzman, City Planner at 755-5100 (TOO 754-8826). Name of Organization Oooortunitv Services Address 1618 W. Thi rd St. Phone 222-0887 (Metro Line) Red Wino. MN 55066 ConmctPe~on Nancy Gurney Title President Please describe your organization's goals and programs, and how they will benefit Andover residents: Oooortunitv Services orovides iob trainina. iob placement and support services to persons with disabilities. Our mission is to assist people to work and contribute to their communities. We orovide service to Anoka Countv and have been requested to build a new facilitv to meet the service needs of youno adults oraduatino from hioh school and needino emolovment. Attach additional sheets, if necessary, ************************************************************************ / Amount ofCDBG funds requested $ 5.000 '. Page 2 CDBG Request Form City of Andover Name of Organization Opportunity Servi ces . Special Project Description: Funds wi 11 be used to bu i1 d a new multi purpose servi ce fad 1 i ty to serve all of Anoka County. Does your Organization serve low to moderate income families or individuals? If you answer no, your organization will not receive funding. ....L- Yes No What percentage of persons served are low/moderate income individuals? 100 % , J Does your organization currently serve residents of Andover? ~Yes No Has your organization served Andover residents in the past? ~Yes No Will these funds be used for the expansion of an existing program? -X- Yes No Will these funds be used for the creation of a new program? Yes x No PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFOR,\1A nON WITH YOUR APPLICA TION: _ 1997 Organization Budget _ Proposed Budget for CDBG Funds Schedule for Expenditure ofCDBG Funds _ Name(s) ofindividual(s) authorized to receive CDBG reimbursement checks, ) CITY OF ANDOVER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBGl FUNDING REQUEST FORM PROJECT YEAR 1997-1998 Community Development Block Grant funds are available to organizations that provide special services to low to moderate income individuals and families. The City of Andover receives CDBG funds through Anoka County and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. The application deadline is February 21,1997. Funds will be awarded at the City Council/HRA meeting on Tuesday, March 4,1997 at 7:00 pm at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Blvd. NW, Additional information may be obtained from John Hinzman, City Planner at 755-5100 (TDD 754-8826). Name of Organization Rise, Incorporated Address 8406 Sunset Road NE Phone 786- 8 3 3 4 \ Sprinq Lake Park, MN 55432 Contact Person John J. Barrett Title Pres ident Please describe your organization's goals and programs, and how they will benefit Andover residents: See attached "Goals and Proqrams" Attach additional sheets. if necessary. ************************************************************************ " . ) Amount ofCDBG funds requested S 5,000 " / Page: 2 CDBG Re:qut.:st Form City of Andover Name of Organization ~i ~p Tn~(')rp(')rrlt-pn Special Project Description: See attached "Project Description" Does your Organization serve low to moderate income families or individuals? If you answer no, your organization will not receive funding. X Yes - No What percentage of persons served are low/moderate income individuals? , 1 nn % / Does your organization currently serve residents of Andover? X Yes No Has your organization served Andover residents in the past? -'1L- Yes No Will these funds be used for the expansion of an existing program? Yes x No Will these funds be used for the creation of a new program? _Yes x No PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING lNFOIU"IA nON WITH YOUR APPLICATION: '\ / x x x x 1997 Organization Budget Proposed Budget for CDBG Funds Schedule for Expenditure ofCDBG Funds Name(s) ofindividual(s) authorized to receive CDBG reimbursement checks. Rise, Incorporated , City of Andover Community Development Block Grant Funding Request 1997 / Goals and Prog-rams Rise is a private, nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation established in 1971 to support people with disabilities in attaining their personal measure of vocational achievement, self-sufficiency, and belonging in their communities. Rise is dedicated to building a community which is more accepting of its citizens. Rise supports the development of creative partnerships with businesses, governmental agencies, and the general public to meet this objective. Rise provides job training, employment, transitional housing, and supported living services to persons with mental, physical, developmental, emotional, learning, and mental health disabilities, who are unemployed, underemployed, and dependent upon public sector support. In 1995 Rise served a total of 1,703 persons: 55 percent (941) of Rise clients were Anoka County residents, 31 percent (521) Hennepin County residents, 9 percent (158) Ramsey County residents, and 2 percent (31) Chisago County residents, .' Requests for Rise services continue to increase as does the severity of the disabilities of the persons Rise provides services to, In the last several years Rise has developed new programs for individuals with traumatic brain injuries, persons with severe/profound disabilities from the Faribault Regional Treatment Center, students with severe emotional disabilities in the Anoka- Hennepin School District, people with disabilities who are seeking competitive job placements in our Projects with Industry (PWI) program, people who are deaf or hard of hearing in our Minnesota Employment Center (MEC) program, people who have both mental illness and developmental disabilities, and a career development/employment program for members of minority groups, Because of this growth, Rise's average daily census increased to 957 persons in 1995. Although our figures for total number of people served in 1996 are not complete, we do know that we served 19 residents of Andover. These individuals received job training, placement, and were employed in supported and community-based jobs doing productive work and earning wages. Eleven were transported to their jobs with Rise vehicles, Proiect Description Rise continues to meet the needs of the community through its individualized and innovative programs and services. It provides job training and helps people secure community-based or competitive employment jobs. Rise clients depend on transportation to meet their individual needs and the requirements of their jobs, therefore, transportation is integral to the success of Rise programs, .' Many Rise program participants do not drive or own a vehicle and depend on public transportation. Unfortunately, public transportation is often not accessible to many people or in some cases is not considered an appropriate option for some vulnerable adults with disabilities, \ .J ~ ) " '~ .' It is because of this, that Rise entered the transportation business in 1983. Today Rise provides transportation to over 250 persons daily with 24 vans which take them to their jobs efficiently and in a timely manner, Rise vehicles transport people to over 20 job sites in the community, some as close as Pizza Hut in Spring Lake Park and others as far as Cater Air in Bloomington. Two of the vans Rise uses each day have over 200,000 miles on them and need to be replaced. Rise's transportation system needs are ongoing. Each year several vehicles need to be replaced and/or sometimes one or two additional vans have to be purchased to accommodate additional participants and their needs. Rise is seeking fInancial support from the Anoka County CDBG program because the funding Rise receives from the government for program service fees does not cover the purchase of capital equipment or other program-related items, Proposed Budg-et for CDBG Funds The total cost of a 15-passenger van and one with a chair lift is $55,000. All CDBG funds approved for Rise by the City of Andover will be used toward the purchase of the replacement vans. Schedule for Expenditure of CDBG Funds This is a one year project and the termination date of it is 12/1/97, Individual Authorized to Receive CDBG Reimbursement Checks John J. Barrett, President, Rise, Inc. .' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION , / DATE: March 4. 1997 AGENDA SECTION EDA Meeting ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. TI F Report g. Dick Fursman, Administration Staff will be presenting a detailed report on TIF spending, reserves and allocations. ! , ,I CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACTION ~ ' DATE: March 4. 1997 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO q. Request Assistance Medical Clinic Planning David L. Carlberg ~ Community Development Director Discussion The Economic Development Authority (EDA) is requested to consider offering financial assistance to a medical clinic for the development of a clinic north of Hanson Boulevard NW and Bunker Lake Boulevard NW (north of Super America). Attached is a letter from Michael F, Hurley of Bama, Guzy & Steffen, L TD representing the group of physicians developing the clinic. The letter outlines the proposal and development of the site. The following are some of the highlights of the proposal . Site consists of 4,5 acres at a cost of $1.65 a square foot. The asking price with $10,000 in special assessments is $333,000,00, . Phase I consists of the construction of multi-level building with a footprint of 12-15,000 square feet with an estimated construction cost of $1,9 million, In addition, it is estimated that it will cost $750,000,00 to equip the clinic in Phase I. " ) . Phase I staffing would include 5 primary physicians and 20-25 support positions, . Phase II consists of the completion of the second floor with an estimated construction cost of $1.6 million, In addition, it is estimated that it will cost $320,000,00 to equip the clinic in Phase II. . It is anticipated that an additional 5-7 doctors would be added with 3-4 support staff per doctor within 2-3 years. . Total estimated cost for land acquisition, construction (Phase I & II) and equipment will be approximately $4,9 million, The medical group is requesting for the initial financial outlay for the clinic, The EDA is asked to underwrite the cost of the land in the amount not to exceed $300,000,00. Staff will discuss what means or options are available to provide assistance with the Council at the meeting, , / Rl'I1ERT A. (a 'II' I1ERNAl\n E. :.;TUTEN RIClIARn A. MERRILL nARRELL A, JENSEN JEFFREY S, JOIINS< 1N RUSSELL H. CRownER JON P. ERICKSON L:""'~"NCE R. JOHNSON l~ A, COSSI Th~...!AS r. MALONE MICHAEL F. HURLEY VIRGIL C. HERRICK HERMAN L. TALLE BGS CHARLES M. SEYKORA DANIEL D. GANTER, JR. BEVERLY K, OODGE GREGG V. HERRICK JAMES D. HOEFJ' JOAN M, QUADE SCOIT M, LEPAK ELIZABETH A. SCHADING MARTHA K, SIEBER WILLIAM F. HUEFNER BRADLEY A, KLETSCHER Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. ATIORNEYS AT LAW 400 Northtown Financial Plaza 200 Coon Rapids Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55433-5894 ROBERT C. HYNES 1935.1993 (612) 780-8500 FAX (612) 780-1777 RECEIVED FEB 181997 CITY OF ANDOVER Writer's Direct Line (612) 783-5117 February 14, 1997 Mr. David carlberg Community Development Director City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 Re: Request for Assistance on Development Costs/Andover Economic Development Authority Dear Mr. Carlberg: , I This letter is to follow up to our conversations regarding the proposed development of a medical clinic within the city of Andover. I represent a large group of physicians which currently have clinics located in the northern metro area. The physicians I represent would like to better serve their existing patients and expand their base of new patients. Upon review of the demographics and proposed growth of the northern metro area, it is my client's opinion that the City of Andover is in need of a medical clinic to serve its residents. , My client would like to construct a clinic located in the area of Hanson and Bunker Lake Boulevard. The facility to be constructed would be a multi-level building with a "footprint" of approximately 12-15,000 square feet. My client anticipates staffing the clinic initially with up to 5 primary care physicians and associated support staff. It is anticipated that within a 2-3 year period the patient volume will grow substantially and an additional 5-7 doctors will be needed at the clinic's Andover office. In addition to family physicians, numerous medical and surgical specialists are also members of the group practice I represent. As soon as an adequate patient base is established in Andover, my client intends to have some of its specialists practice part-time at this office. Therefore, Andover area residents would be able to get both primary and some specialty services locally. We feel that a "close to home" source of high quality medical services would be a great benefit for local residents, and make Andover ~ / :\n Equal ('ll,('prruniry ElIlrlllYl'f February 14, 1997 \ Page 2 ) even more attractive to young a move to Andover. families and businesses considering The purpose of this letter is to request that the Andover Economic Development Authority (EDA) consider assisting the clinic with some of their initial financial outlay. More specifically, we would like the EDA to consider underwriting the cost of this land. The cost of the land is $1.65 per square foot plus special assessment which are approximately $10,000. The parcel would be a four and one-half acre site. The asking price for the land is approximately $333,000.00. Although we do not have plans and specifications for the clinic building prepared, the preliminary estimated cost of facility construction is $1,900,000.00. The project will be constructed in two phases. Phase I of the construction entails a 12-15,000 square foot facility. The second floor of the facility will be constructed but not built out. The estimated cost for construction of Phase II of the facility is $1,600,000.00. Phase II of the facility would be completed in the second or third year after construction of Phase I, depending on new patient base at the clinic. , ~ . In addition to the hard cost for the construction and development of the parcel, my client estimates it will cost approximately $750,000.00 to equip the clinic in Phase I and $320,000.00 to equip Phase II of the clinic. The cost for acquisition of the parcel, construction of Phase I and II of the building and equipping the facility will be approximately $4,900,000.00 total. In addition to the hard cost outlined above, my client project's an operating expense deficit of $500,000.00 for the first two years of operation. The clinic estimates it will take approximately 24 months to obtain the necessary patient base to break even on operating expenses. I would also like to point out that this project in addition to benefiting the tax base for the community, will also generace a substantial amount of new jobs in the community. The clinic estimates that approximately 3 1/2 to 4 nursing, lab, x-ray and reception staff are needed per physician. Therefore, we would expect that at least 20-25 support people will be employed at the facility during Phase I. We also assume that some of the support people and/or physicians may relocate in the Andover area in order to be close to their work. As you can see from the above numbers, my client envisions a substantial cash infusion into this project. In order to ensure that the project is successful, we would like the EDA to consider helping my client with some of our initial capital outlay. My client asks that the EDA consider underwriting the cost of the , > ~ } , ) , February 14, 1997 Page 3 land in an amount not to exceed $300,000.00. Please accept this letter as a request to consider the above-referenced help in financing the project. My client and I will be willing to meet with the EDA to give them more specifics regarding the project and show you our cost estimates for construction and equipping the facility. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincerely, MFH:has 1 J CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DA TE March 4, 1997 AGENDA SECTION r-o. Discussion Item, cont. ITEM r-o. Comprehensive Plan Task Force Appointments If). Request ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA --)wW John Hinzman City Planner Planning BY: The City Council is asked to appoint ten (10) members to the Comprehensive Plan Task Force Committee. At the January 7, 1997 City Council meeting, staffwas directed to advertise for positions and contact former members of the Committee, Those interested in serving on the Committee were asked to fill out an application indicating their experience, background, and reason for serving, Sixteen applications were sent out, and seven were returned, In selecting members, the Council should consider balancing the geographic, social and economic diversity in the City, including urban and rural interests, Following is a list of those interested in serving on the committee, a map indicating the area of the city in which they reside, and those applications received as of February 26. Additional applications may be forthcoming, and will be distributed at the meeting, " / 1997 Comprehensive Plan Task Force Applicants 1. Maynard Apel, 1781 I 57th Lane 2, Brian Barringer, 2938 l42nd Avenue 3. Lynette Barry, 14436 Xeon Street 4. Mike Gamache, 2815 134th Avenue 5. Al Grabowski, 1266 146th Lane 6, Don Jacobson, 14826 University Avenue 7. Jeff Kieffer, 3975 149th Avenue 8, Jim Lindahl, 17275 Tulip Street 9, Rebecca Pease, 3300 152nd Lane 10. Randall Peek, 13405 Uplander Street 11. Marjorie Perry, 17337 Roanoke Street 12. Gretchen Sabel, 3540 153rd Avenue 13. Byron Westlund, 3318 167th Lane 14. Leonard J. Groen, Sr., 4048 Genie Dr. 15. James Knoll, 14817 Round Lake Blvd. 16, Tom Widhalm, 2742 164th Lane Numbers correspond to map. Attached applications appear in italics, ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ;; <: '" 'U '" " " ....; 0 ij; CO '0 ~ 0 0 -E 0 .0 Cl .c 00 'u j z ... ~ ~ j " 0 '" " t.l " " =:: z. Cl ;;", ~ I " 0 t;: N . . . . I . . . , . t I . . , , I . I . . . . . . I I . I , 1 ; i '-.:~: I' ::=:\ \ -E;\ / :~...~, \ I ::=~ f; :.-: :~~ ll,j.i';~'.l'" . -.0:'-:.: J...~';-~_ . r ".-_:.-' ,..... I . . . , , .,..., 1[0',1 -_:=~ ~ .';-.:; I . ii I \0-;.~- i "'. r~. , a: \ I 0:: W > o o .. z u <( Q, ~ LL o >- l- t) '. / ;f ... 1 ~ ~ i "Z\ H i : :' :. w w..... ~ 111 -l VI iA "' _N~ . . , E E E 1 :; VI z z i!!6~~i ~:;f o~ ". " ~ 8 '. ,;~. ~Si. ~ i '1 H .i: ;f ;' ,,t ~.?" ~" ~ s il · : ~ :i ~ ," ~~_~! ~ H n ~ 1']- ['I' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H ffi . . . . . . ; i i i i I I, " ~l i /1-.1 -I~ 1 , , -I ; If'" / ~ !,,"" , " , /;;,,,,3'; 11"111 I1I'iil L"O' I)..... '.' ~,.' '. ~ _ ~,_:, i _ -.I. "j:tl[f'tJ':oE --f'~IJ'LCJ'~E ~'AI~E 0:':: \ ) CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWiIl BOULEVARD N.VI, . ANDOvER, MINNESOTA 5.5304 . (612) 755.5100 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TASK FORCE COMMITTEE Name: Lynnecte M. Barry Address: 14436 leon Scree~ N.W. An~over. MN 55304 Home Phone: 434-:5316 Work Phone: ~Z~-1l49 x2.5 Please state your reasons for desiring to be on the Comprehensive Plan Task Force Committee: S~rving on this committee would enable me to better understand the Comprehensive Plan for ~he City of Andover in more depth. It will also \ @nable me to ba involved in another proee9~ for establishing policy within the city level of government. Please describe your education/experience which qualifies you to serve on this committee: 15 plus years 1n the mortgage. real estate industry. During those years w~tn~n th~t ~ndu~try, exteu61ve exposure to new construct~on. prOject development. I have also ~upervised departments~of 20 plus employees. C'r"....ant'y I I .m pl~~1R8 to,o,1npnY"i:t..y .1"\,.1 p"~I'\~t.rJ" f"t'\ 1-.<1.... bmpl,..y~lto(t f." t'PE' mor~gage, banking, real estate areas. I Pkase describe your professional, civic or community activities which may be relevant to till;, committee: Mave served on the ~ity hall task forcQ. planning and zoning commiss1on~ and the task force tormed.,to address the issue ot "family" .tor occupancy Within the residential area of Andover. Always active 1n issues concerning the city, school district, and as much as possible the county level issues. Dated: February 3. 1997 / ) CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 COivlPREHENSIVE PLAN TASK FORCE COMMITTEE Address: 4f G;J,~.sf7 /c.j&, "if ,LAJ Name: Home Phone: /..20>y. 1-3'-1-1"'3 Co Work Phone: s- 7c.f- ~ /Ju Please state your reasons for desiring to be on the Comprehensive Plan Task Force Committee:,...--- /J /' /0 ~~ /)rOv,.vYe .5rCt-.f~e;.'c dfrt"J~a~ ~ 1''''"-'-1'1' 1'&1 -,tie- 67 ~ ~A~ ; Please describe your education/experience which qualifies you to serve on this comml% fie. ,../(:I ~ g.~J:-~J t!.OY"1rz,Oss,~;</) ~;,.dZv-- ~,,{/.~ 1:>........ ,$" n--4../t"'o; .'c. .:l;{.".h~w -ex ~~..-.I,.....,P ~ /' I' 71 Please describe your professional, civic or community activities which may be reievant to this committee: ~ See::..-- a / /6 7ec...-- res? ~~ f- ;2../.;2./97 / /2Jp 46-/ Signature ( Dated: \ / \ ) CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TASK FORCE COMMITTEE . . . Work Phone: .. fl~ou t2 It- 3o-~-I'l'Y~ ~lJ , .. . , Please state your reasons for d~mng to be on the Comprehensive Plan Task Force . , . Committee: , . 10 Cedl1f-t..-i'L. @fi:..ec.ll'("J plA-'t A.-; J II--- ru cvl' I h~ C/1'r PA.rl(~ T rA,( ~ / /' / Please describe your education/experience which qualifies you to serve on this committee: Y' -I- r Ar .. n+ PA r' K c C..-- -1"1 I.... rr,,~ /J Q () A . (,VI"" h / ~outt, /~-.. t'k/..a/ r-'5,...r.-f j.!;'y..."f~/ ,t-c.tt",-,~/..y, ,.,..,(.6!t. <t,; , ~(~"S "'., ...",". Please describe your professional, civic or community activities which may be relevant to this committee: S./d K.''':':l ~J?;~r........ ~~ T8 ~ ~ "CiY1n-r-J r ' ;/ ~ciA....<J r ,,(..<;~/-, e~;h I .4rhc...... ./ Dated: d;~ 4~/>~ " , ) CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TASK FORCE COMMITTEE Name: ("'.:7 ( e. +C V\ E?_ ,-- ~)~~ ~:..-"" e - \ ':'--, ~ ;c\ ' Address:5S 4 <J _ ~ +\ \.~ \' \ - .. \...; Home Phone: 4 Z I . S S q ~ Work Phone: ZCi 1 . 7 S '7 ~ Please state your reasons for desiring to be on the Comprehensive Plan Task Force Committee: . --- . . <, ~ /" -'- ""',,.- ,,', . ". '7 /7 - - .' ',',' '....,. (-\ ~ i'\C....'..L ..;>"-~_....'- ~'\l"~C'---r t__.v.t.'-~"-"~.J ....... '"'"t""""-..\.- \...... _'"Ll...1.. '::l....I.....c..'~'"'C..... .. - ,- .J -\-'-X:\i..'"c. T C~..\ Illest C.lli.:;;. t.,-,-(~ l,-'\""~\ ;:c: ~C:\\..L\ ':'l "'....\...(..i,-+--, . r. J '.' ;' d, L,-\~ c-,,'Cl -5cf;\.'.-\~,c,--t (_ X-hI ,.(,1,_,.:." (,,'(, 0'_Li",-,<cl c~'0 Please describe your educatioriJ~xperience which qualifies you to serve on thisC:" ~ \(~ "C'f :':-'1, '.' . r\'-', ......~l.. ->'~"""~.'- commIttee: _.,... .- v' - "" ' .....'\..- '( .- ;-!,t..i,~\~i-r6 l~t...\v:- \1'....."'.:1....(. -~1;CL+~.....~"-\. (c.j 7Z ~:-"~ ~,-....i -~+=:b.;. I .,.i.... rlrd.:~1i'-l C,-\ _\1,,__ ~l...:\l...'\\.;.-.. L....'Y\4-<i..:\ ~:)...""~.t. c....:q.e::.....:"'t"~"'\ S'-...:.:......v-.~,-...t -tl~....,.."~'(""".....cl\.__..:...~ ~--(-\'-- 'Tc._,-'T'I''-'-*' '::"I')'tt.,,,.. L.';T. C......-tl{\"C'\ e\C,,~(\e; - ~'I'-i.. ,tc............ (Vl~-nt-,,+e.... 'tf.; C..('-n'~E..v\. P\(~,\'h:r> fcl"u\..-t,,\ -6s ,- t.1~,lc;~,,\, C\:~ (t C"Ct'.li~. Please describe your professionai, civic or community activities which may be reievant to this committe~: _~___, t\. '- :;...._~....:.. (~i..(;.l({ ,~~.'~'~ .L.t.' - L" ,-. -f ~ _ "\ . i-I, t , '<:~:' "1_ -. .'.... ~, - ..t:- ,"'+' (_' _"_ ,-I, \...'-.... ,"::.'.:' 4\_.::,..... ~ ,,',",. -"'c. ":'''.. l::. r... if.: C1 ".4,.-. ....: y':.... ..',:" _ _ ...,-t...- \("-.~,.... -r;:- l.II.... t .;\ j',.(.- -... 'C< , .:--;. .', 'J .' '",' -,,51- , 'rt:., ~';~~~?'~;;"~' LOr' , ,8ignature .\..... Dated: ;-e~b 3, Iqerl , ) \ CITY of ANDOVER , ; 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW, . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 5530~ tC7E-rV ED FEB 04 1997 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TASK FORCE COMMlTTEIC IT Y 0 FAN 0 0 V E F Name: " Ij~KOtj , \ lu E,sl"wr-.J.D Address: '~.~ 19 \L;1.-1-'- {.A~\Cc f'J \;J Home Phone: 1C7 '~- !? (I i; C, Work Phone: Y-2-1-1000 Please state your reasons for desiring to be on the Comprehensive Plan Task Force Committee: -<1 LUl)tU&.Qt.L ~ Cfy. Vl^-p-Lr t.<A- b '"tt..... Jt.l.-u.d~ '~D ~ Q.~ I \/I",\I",~,- ~ tl-'Y\.-'- a.~~,,-r "D' . / Please describe your education/experience which qualifies you to serve on this cRmmittee: Iltl\ 21f'W.~ ,0.- tL tYj,I..~~ ~1 0vV.- }ill.LU W~~ u:~ m{1 ~ ~ ~ Lta~F~Hn-. q u.,1-L-- {..ii-, JJ1E ~ ' , Please describe your professional, civic or community activities which may be relevant to this committee: ~. di a.1;\",- ~;l.ll,-'~~<"4/' VL\H\. t{u... (,l) fx(,J. cu.,,-- ~:--CA.....L~'Y'-.. , T.()'1I'- [~-I tU..,u,--. tf~ {U<...w.p~_A_ &'U'f"'~' HLL Dated: ;J~A/ -tf 7 . &~1'^,hLJ'LU~ Slgnatur , \ . j \ , ) CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TASK FORCE COMMlTIEE Name: L€VN~{l,i) ,]", G-P>c::;.-=:N ">r" Address: 4(') 1- 9 ("',~ ~'-~ ,"),< N L.." ..4-Nr)o \r'~,z. Home Phone: 3".:2 3 - / 3 C 2. Work Phone: 944 - If,:q.o Please state your reasons for desiring to be on the Comprehensive Plan Task Force Committee: T L,,;e.:...... A""dcc;i';- "~......c V\"V" (~S:-e.,.,-+ c.cnc.e.ri\ S:c:- -J-l",02.. C.Oi'Y1(yh;I'\,J-V/~ C..:. L -.:.. 0-.S u.; ~ II c".s .ccf'"' -\-'-" e.. ~ r ,'Y"\; l; e..> ..u..,,~ 't- \; 'J -L 'r. e..' e.. W \ U-- lY1 e.. . \ / Please describe your education/experience which qualifies you to serve on this committee: ke.c..e.n ~l,1 ("e.,.\., ('~~ ( ). 5 A ('(Y)}' ~J;.C-if<' ~ T L i oJ L he....... CLi'\ C. !: I . C ('~('~ w""'c_\- ~C~?~ e.n <; ; 1"'\ (VI" ("i"nil''''h)''';~. -n:.c~+;'" o.-LL +h~ q vo..L. ~ i c..:-\-, cf'\ S n e..c.~ss."-("y 4 Ie. 'I: b <l..l i e..v ~) Please describe your professional, civic or community activities which may be relevant to this committee: I jv,.;<, 6'r_t- Crt <:>-n ~ ('C"rv-\vc.~~c!. IIC~P:-b"'~ r C"(Y')(Y'l;+fees CA.'" d bcCU"ds . (~k, \. l ':'.:2 r,l; "'5 MY (~u(')~tr)l, f"h; c, I.\("....:/,.J. 6 0 (Y'I '/ -Ci (' s + c...pc,-,+ ~rciY'\ +"'~ MiL. tc..<"y. ~I ~ Dated: 0:;' h. c;-/9 ~ . ~ Ignature .' \ J U4/~~/~~J( ~~.~( ~O.LL"'L.O"';"JtJ N'IUL.J..- rf--ll'l"-' \ ; CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARO NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 553G4 · (612) 755-5100 COMPREHENS1VE PLAN TASK FORCE COMMITTEE ' Name: ::1fi me:} *"('101..'- Address: /~J'/'7 f(JllHO ~E: Bl-lJ 0 Home Phone: 4:11- 33r::1.. wort Phone: 42/- .l.fl.t8 PlellSe state your reasons for desiring to be on the Comprehensive Plan Task Force Committee: 1': LU"uLn ./.I.r,r 10 ~~ IJ I:fA!T "T T#~ f':fIlAlAlI,A.I6- Itll/) f)E()eMjJlh~NT ()"f rH,; (!/TY illY rli'l1tlL.Y h'/flS L../f)$~ J.N F,/l ove.e. .yo y,(,s. / Please describe your education/experience which qualifies you to serve QI1 this committee: 8/fe.IIG'JLJR /Jc6.ea:- 6T eJ.,DUtJ / Bus "v~s~ Q~"~~ ~. EdfPuY~~ , ~ \ //11 rJl~ f!. , -ry Please describe your professional, civic or community activities which maybe relevant to this committee: 1/)/0.1:.4 (!{.fU!JT'I u.:r~.A<; 'DR ~ y~S - tl./lIfIR 4YRS .. h1 /## ~ . 3 YCAJeS- AI/A'R FJlu,rJL.I!U 6=Rcw&.R.s ~~;(RO ~~'t~$ '. /~ ~'/es f Dated: ;/-::J ~ 47 4~~ Si ' \ / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \ ) DATE: March 4. 1997 ITEM NO. Schedule Special Meeting/Funding for Reconstruction Projects If. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Scott Erickson, Jf- Engineering AGENDA SECTION Reports of Staff, Committees, Commissions The City Council is requested to schedule a special meeting to discuss funding policies for street reconstruction and overlay projects. \ / " / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '\ , DATE: March 4, 1997 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Reror.ts of Staff, Committees, Commissions ITEM NO. Award Bid/94-30A/Furniture Contract, Coni. J~, Dick Fursman, Administration The bid opening for furniture for the new City Hall, Project 94-30A, is scheduled for Monday, March 3, 1997 at 10:00 AM. The results of the bid opening will be provided at the meeting. , / \ / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '\ DATE: March 4 1997 ITEM NO. Discuss Alternate Street AlignmenUBunker Lake Blvd. Service Road (Phase II) /3, ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Scott EricksonJL Engineering AGENDA SECTION Reports of Staff, Committees, Commissions The City Council is requested to review and approve a revised street alignment for the next phase of the South Andover Site redevelopment project. The original proposed street alignment identified a service road running adjacent to Bunker Lake Boulevard set approximately 250 feet south of the County right-of-way to provide for lots abutting Bunker Lake Boulevard. In order to reduce the amount of wetland impact, this alignment will need to be adjusted around the wetland areas. The revised alignment will minimize wetland impacts, maintain lots along Bunker Lake Boulevard and maintain the curvilinarity of the streets as requested by the City Council. The drawing of the revised alignment will be presented at the meeting. ) TKDA is currently working on the feasibility report for this phase of the project. '\ / CITY OF ANDOVER AGENDA SECTION N), Discussion Item REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE March 4, 1997 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM N), Rezoning 97-0 I Rezone R-l to SC, Section 23 Edward and Lora Hamilton Planning ~~<< BY: John Hinzman City Planner /1 Request The applicants, Edward and Lora Hamilton have requested that this item be tabled until the March 18, 1997 City Council meeting. A copy of their request is attached. , J \ ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: \ I February 25,1997 RECEIVED FEB 271997 CITY OF ANDOVER Mr, Dave Carlberg Community Development Director City of Andover 1685 Northwest Crosstown Boulevard Andover, MN 55304 Dear Mr. Carlberg: We request the public hearing, regarding the rezoning of our parcel, to be postponed from March 4, 1997 to March 18, 1997. This change in date would allow us to coordinate our activities with potential land buyers, We appreciate your consideration regarding this request. Sincerely, ) - ' e_-{.'-LcH" ,t- ~'; ~~nt.-l~L Lora G. Hamilton ". /~/oC'lL~ Edward L. Hamilton \ I CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ., I DATE: March 4 1997 ITEM NO. Approve 1997 Park Dedication Expenditures /5'. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Todd J. Haas, / Parks Coordinator AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item The City Council is requested by the Park and Recreation Commission to approve the 1997 Park Dedication Expenditures as follows: $250,000 - Coon Creek Trail ($50,000 DNR) ($200,000 City Cost) $15,900 - Sunshine Park - Site Furnishing in and around building. Still Pending - Woodland Estates - Bikeway Route Projects approved for expenditures to date. $52,000 - Shadowbrook - Bikeway/Walkway Trail \ ) Note: $30,000 - Hills of Bunker Lake 5th Addition Park development would use the donation funds available from Andover Lions, \ ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION " ) DATE: March 4. 1997 ITEM NO. Approve 1997 Park Capital Improvement Budget /1.. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Todd J, Haas, ~ Parks Coordinator AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item The City Council is requested by the Park and Recreation Commission to approve the 1997 Park Capital Improvement Budget as follows: . $7,500 - Oak Bluff - New Playground (ages 2-5) . $7,500 - Langseths Park - New Playground (ages 2-5) . $7,500 - Pheasant Oaks Park - New Playground (ages 2-5) . $4,500 - Sunshine Park - 2 sets of small soccer goals . $7, t 00 - City Hall Park Complex # t - Install irrigation system for soccer field/south side of water tower . $ t 2,000 - Sunshine Park - 3 sets of bleachers for soccer fields . $6,000 - Sunshine Park - 3 concrete pads for bleachers \ . $2,5000 - Pine Hills Park - outfield fencing for t baseball field ) . $ t ,500 - Pleasant Oaks - fence along west property line as recommended by Berkley Risks. . $3,900 - Sunshine Park - outside fencing for the 2 small softball fields . $2.000 Unexended t 996 Park Capital Improvements (Sunshine Park - outfield fencing for the 2 small softball fields) $62,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE '\ / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 1 j DATE: March 4. 1997 ITEM NO. Approve Plans & Specs/97 -3/Cracksealing /1 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Scott Erickson,~t Engineering AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 97-3, cracksealing for City streets. Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review. , ) \ ./ 1 J CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO, 97-3 ,FOR CRACKSEALlNG. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 020-97 ,adopted by the City Council on the 21st day of January ,19----9I., the City Engineer has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 97-3 for cracksealing; and WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City Council for their review on the 4th day of March , 19~. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications, j BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids to be opened at 10:00 AM , Thursday. March 27 ,19 97 at the Andover City Hall. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this ~ day of March , 19 97 , with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers _ voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J,E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk \ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '\ J DATE: March 4 1997 AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Approve Plans & Specs/97-4/Sealcoating ./~. Scott Erickson,~l Engineering The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 97-4, sealcoating for City streets. Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review, \ J '\ CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA , / RES, NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO, 97-4 ,FOR SEALCOATING, WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No, 021-97 ,adopted by the City Council on the 21st day of January ,19~, the City Engineer has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 97-4 for sealcoating; and WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City Council for their review on the 4th day of March , 19....9L, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications. / BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids to be opened at 10:30 AM , Thursday. March 27 ,19 97 at the Andover City Hall. MOTION seconded by Council member and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this..A1h.- day of March , 19 97 , with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers _ voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed, CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk " CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION j DATE: March 4 1997 AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Approve Plans & Specs/96-30/Timber Oaks Estates /9. Scott Erickson,~t Engineering The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications and ordering the advertisement for bids for Project 96-30, Timber Oaks Estates for sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm sewer construction. Specifications are available in the Engineering Department for review. / 1 / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 97-4 ,IN THE AREA OF TIMBER OAKS ESTATES FOR SANITARY SEWER. WATERMAIN. STREET AND STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 015-97 ,adopted by the City Council on the 21st day of January ,19~, the City Engineer has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 96-30 for sanitary sewer. watermain street and storm sewer. WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City Council for their review on the 4th day of March , 19--9L. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications. " I BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids to be opened at 10:00 AM , Wednesday April 9 ,19 97 at the Andover City Hall. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this -A1tL day of March , 19 97 , with Council members voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers _ voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 1 j DATE: March 4 1997 AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Scott Erickson,~l Engineering ITEM NO. Approve Revised Grading Plan/Woodland Estates ,;;10 The City Council is requested to approve the resolution revising the grading/drainage/erosion control plan for Woodland Estates as requested by the developer, Woodland Development. The developer's engineer has raised the lot elevations and street grade to provide for the required cover over the sanitary sewer line at the southwest corner of the plat. , / 1 j CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REVISED GRADINGIDRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL PLAN OF WOODLAND ESTATES AS BEING DEVELOPED BY WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. . WHEREAS, the Andover Review Committee has revised the revised grading/drainage/erosion control plan; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 297-96 continues to be in force regarding the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the City Council approves the revised grading/drainage/erosion control plan with a revision date of February 25 1997 . , / NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the revised grading/drainage/erosion control plan. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 4th day of March, 19 97. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk " CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ') j DATE: March 4. 1997 Non-Discussion/Consent Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT City Clerk J ~ AGENDA SECTION ITEM NO. Amend Ordinance 59/Extending Cable TV Franchise ;If. The franchise between the City of Andover and Group W of the Quad Cities, dba Meredith Cable was due to expire this spring. Because of the sale of the system and subsequent purchase by U.S. West, the Cable Commission felt that we would have better bargaining power if we extended the renewal date. This way the larger Cable Commissions will renew their franchises before we do and we may be able to save considerable money in the development of documents and negotiations. The extended renewal date is September 9, 1998. ) Attached is an ordinance amendment for your approval. j CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ) I ORDINANCE NO. 59D AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CABLE FRANCHISE ORDINANCE NO. 59, ARTICLE II, SECTION 4, FRANCHISE TERM. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 59, Article II, Section 4, Franchise Term, is hereby amended to read: Section 4. Franchise Term This Franchise shall commence upon acceptance by Grantee and shall expire on September 9, 1998. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective upon passage and official publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 1tI1.day of March. 199L / CITY OF ANDOVER J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Attest: Victoria V olk - City Clerk Accepted by Grantee this day of , 1997. GROUP W OF THE QUAD CITIES, INC. By: j CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION / DATE: March 4 1997 AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Traffic Signal Warrants d~ Scott Erickson, ~ Engineering At the February 18,1997, Road Committee meeting the Committee requested that information be provided detailing what criteria is used by the Anoka County Highway Dept. in order to determine warranted signal locations. Attached is a copy of the warrant requirements and a typical intersection study (This example is from the intersection of 133rd Ave.lCompost Site Road which was performed by the County Highway Department.) Although there is not a simple way to break this information down, the attached description of the warrant requirements provide a fairly good definition. ;' J . I . _ J \ . j EXAMPLE: 133RD AVENUE NW & COMPOST SITE ROAD TRAFFIC STUDY ... C ell E C) 1:: c 1 III .- / c. C ell .. Z617 C ::::l >- ... 'C >- 'C ::::l III ... M ~ C rn .c C 'll: III ... 't: a: oJ: ell C 0 W C) E ell Z !:: :J: E ::::l III ~ 0 ell I- > III C > 0 0 E17Z ::::l 0 :!: c.. 0 !E :E () 0 III III .. U '<t en ..liI: ... a:I co ... N '<t 0 3: co M ... N C <C ClJ:-' ~ 9969 III co ..... M N 17a ... 'll: :l 0 M Ea179 / co 3 CD E9Z Q aL H'lfS:> as Ua:I<l: CD co en N M III N '<t ..... N '<t @) - c ci 6ZL > W -I c:: > :!!: ED W <l: c.. z !:: c CD 0 a: en co tI) tI) M - M co .... Z l- 'll: ... N CD oCt tI) - en 0 a:I to- :I: W (.) - c.. :!!: co :!!: 9917L :!!: I- to- O oCt :I: (.) CD oCt - en tI) W - .... ... (.) :J CO') CI) z - .0 W to- E > '" ::l C oCt z 0 ... ;; c CI) C III c:: ... ::l U M III 0 0 CO') c (.) -I .... aL H'lfSO aN 9EL ..... 6099 co ... ..... CD Zt>V M N '<t '<t 'll: ... 6170L ~ ...J <l: I- ... ... ... ... 0 I- J: =>(fl a:w u J:z ... ... ... ... <l: I-<l: 0 ...J a: c.. c.. <l: u.. 0 I-ZW (fl u..a:Z 0 0 0 0 W w=><( Z ...JI-...J <( ...J I-zw J:a:z 0 0 0 ~=><l: 0 a:1-...J - N M '<t 'll: 'll: 'll: 'll: W.ather tMoatly Clear C......t.c! by.Aml &Dc! ClaI:>. Beare! . 'r ) ANOD. COCHTr BJ:QJI1Q,Y DDAltTXZNT T1lA7P%C DQDmDDfQ SKCT%OJl T1lA7P%C snlDY I CSAII 71 (&an.0Il Blvd) I Prom North Icompoat Sit. Rd. I Prom .&at Vehicl. group 1 ICSAII 78 (lI&naon Blvd) Iprom South 1133rc! Ava. NIl Iprom W.at Stuc!y N__. 'IXC"18 Sit. Cod. . '6180202 Start Dat.. 07/2"'6 Page I 1 Start I %ntvl I ZXclu I %nclu Tim. laiqht Thru Left BEAVYIRiqht Thru Left BEAVYIRiqbt Thru Left HBAVYIRiqht Thru Left BXAVYITotallTotallTotal I 07/2"" 06.001 06.151 06.301 051451 Houri I 07.001 07.151 07.301 07.451 Houri I 08.001 08.151 08.301 08.451 Houri 1 0,.001 0,.151 0,.301 0,,451 Houri I 10.001 10.151 10.301 10.451 Houri I 11.001 11.151 11.301 11.451 Houri I 12.001 12.151 12.301 12.451 Houri / 1 1 1 3 6 149 1" 228 239 812 1 3 4 2 10 188 234 119 161 772 4 5 4 2 15 126 107 116 121 470 4 2 5 5 16 1 7 2 3 13 4 3 1 4 12 4 5 2 6 17 92 88 88 80 348 84 98 n 83 358 91 105 104 84 384 72 80 10' " 357 o o o 1 1 1 1 o 1 3 1 1 o 1 3 2 1 o 1 4 2 1 2 3 8 2 1 1 1 5 o 1 2 1 4 I 31 41 31 21 121 1 41 111 81 01 231 I 71 31 81 101 281 I 21 51 41 41 151 I 51 'I 71 131 341 I 'I 31 21 31 171 I 31 41 71 71 211 o o o o o o o 1 o 1 o 2 o 1 3 o 3 3 2 8 1 4 4 o , 4 1 o 2 7 1 o 3 2 6 o o o o o 1 o o o 1 o o o o o o o 1 o 1 o 2 o 1 3 o 2 o 1 3 2 o o 1 3 o o o o o o o 1 o 1 3 2 o o 5 1 4 3 3 11 o 2 3 2 7 3 6 2 3 14 2 3 2 2 , 1 01 01 01 01 01 1 01 01 01 01 01 I 01 01 01 01 01 I 01 01 11 01 11 I 01 01 01 01 01 I 11 01 01 01 11 I 01 01 01 01 01 o o o o o o 1 o o 1 4 1 o o 5 5 5 3 3 16 o 8 o 3 11 6 4 5 2 17 o 3 4 1 8 28 39 78 74 219 53 58 53 " 253 70 41 5' " 246 58 47 53 75 243 77 70 71 " 297 19 77 81 101 348 " 77 n 88 324 1 o 1 1 3 5 3 3 4 15 1 2 2 5 10 1 3 1 4 , 2 2 2 2 8 5 5 4 2 16 8 4 6 6 24 I 01 31 31 61 121 I 41 41 51 61 191 I 41 31 71 4 , 181 I 51 81 31 3 , 191 I 51 71 41 41 201 I 41 41 81 81 241 I 21 41 81 41 181 12 8 17 26 53 21 15 19 17 72 8 3 8 7 26 12 6 4 6 28 3 5 6 7 21 4 5 6 1 16 6 4 , 6 25 o o o o o o o o o o o o o 1 1 o 1 o 1 2 2 o 2 1 5 o 1 o 1 2 1 2 1 o 4 2 2 6 3 13 I I 01 1"1 01 2531 01 3371 11 356 1 11 11421 I I 01 2911 11 3371 11 3011 o 1 2651 21 11941 I I 11 2301 11 1771 01 206 I o 1 2311 21 8HI I I 01 1851 01 1751 11 1861 01 1921 11 7381 I 1 01 1851 01 2171 11 2031 11 2061 21 8111 I I 01 2221 01 2221 01 2181 21 2181 21 8801 I I 01 1721 01 1191 11 2531 o 1 2241 11 8381 3 6 7 5 21 1 6 2 3 12 3 2 6 5 16 3 2 6 4 15 o 5 4 3 12 5 2 6 4 17 I 31 193 71 246 61 331 , I 347 251 1117 I 81 283 161 321 141 287 6 I 25' HI 1150 I 121 218 71 170 151 191 141 217 481 "6 I 71 178 131 162 'I 177 71 185 361 702 I 101 175 161 201 121 191 181 188 561 755 I 141 208 71 215 10\ 208 131 205 HI 836 1 51 167 81 181 161 237 111 213 40 I 798 W.atb.r lKo8tly Clear C......tad by.Aml &Dc! _ Beare! . or / ANOD. COCHTr BJ:c:B1Q,Y DDAltTXZNT nAPnC DQDmDDfQ SKCT%OJl T1lA7P%C STCDY I CSAII 71 (&an.OD Blvd) I Prom North ICampo.t Site Rd. I Prom But Vehicle ~p 1 I CSAII 71 (BaD'OD Blvd) Ipr<>a South 1133re! Ave. IlW I Prom w..t Study N.... TXC'611 Site Code I '6110202 Stert Date. 07/2'/'6 Pa5J. 2 Start \ I Intvl I Exelu I Inclu Time IRicht Thru Left HllAVYIRicht Thru Left HllAVYIRicht Thru Left HllAVYIRicht Thru Left HllAVY I Tot.l ITotal ITotal 13.00 I 13.151 13.301 13.451 Houri I .141001 14.151 141301 14,451 Houri I 15.001 15.151 15:301 151451 Houri I / 161001 16.151 16:301 16:451 Houri I 171001 17.151 17.301 17.451 Houri 1 11:001 11.151 11.30 I 11.451 Houri I 19.001 19.151 191301 19.451 Houri j 4 16 3 15 3 102 4 " 14 372 4 12 1 '0 7 " 5 73 17 324 1 10 2 93 2 '2 4 102 , 367 3 93 2 13 7 105 10 7' 22 360 I 17 7 114 5 11 7 123 27 405 6 96 3 127 3 73 7 15 19 311 5 74 6 7' 7 54 4 14 22 291 5 2 2 5 14 2 1 3 1 7 2 1 o o 3 1 2 3 2 I 1 2 2 o 5 5 3 3 3 14 1 3 1 o 5 I 1 51 6 I 31 31 171 I 61 21 31 51 HI I 01 41 51 21 111 1 41 51 41 11 141 1 11 41 51 41 141 I 21 21 21 01 61 1 01 11 01 21 31 3 5 1 5 14 o o 4 1 5 1 o o o 1 1 1 5 2 , 1 2 1 2 6 4 1 4 3 12 2 2 2 o 6 o o 1 o 1 o o o o o 2 o 2 1 5 o 2 1 3 6 1 1 o o 2 o 1 1 2 4 2 o o o 2 2 6 5 2 15 1 4 2 1 I 3 3 o 1 7 o 2 3 5 10 1 5 1 3 10 5 6 5 2 11 6 1 2 o , I I 01 01 01 01 01 1 01 31 01 01 31 I 11 01 01 01 11 1 01 01 01 01 01 I 01 11 01 01 11 I 01 01 01 01 01 I 01 01 01 01 01 3 70 5 12 5 '5 5 '5 11 342 2 12 1 16 3 10 2 11 I 32' 1 130 1 132 1 134 o 169 3 565 3 167 5 141 4 229 2 197 14 741 3 207 2 232 3 1,. 5 212 13 IU 5 211 4 151 2 152 5 141 16 662 5 133 o 120 o 95 o 103 5 451 2 3 7 5 17 6 5 7 6 24 I 11 4 13 36 13 I l' 19 5' 14 20 24 20 71 19 13 11 14 57 I 6 , 10 33 I I '1 41 71 " 291 1 61 51 21 51 111 I 31 II 31 31 171 1 21 31 31 31 111 I 41 41 11 41 131 I 11 21 21 11 61 1 01 21 01 01 21 6 3 6 7 22 3 3 4 6 16 5 7 2 5 l' 1 4 7 6 11 , 4 13 7 33 6 I 3 11 21 5 6 4 3 11 1 o 2 o 3 o o o o o 1 o 1 1 3 o o o 2 2 1 o o o 1 2 o 2 1 5 1 o o o 1 5 3 6 2 16 I I I I 01 2011 01 2071 01 2451 01 2411 01 8941 1 I 01 1951 11 2061 11 2011 01 1911 21 "31 I I 01 2421 11 2611 01 2411 01 3011 11 105'1 I I 01 2901 01 2661 01 3961 01 3381 01 1290 I I 1 01 3421 01 4041 01 3341 o I 3931 01 14731 I I 01 3711 01 330 I 01 2661 01 2171 01 12611 I I 01 2521 01 2321 01 1771 o I 20' I 01 870 I 1 4 6 5 16 4 5 2 o 11 2 1 6 7 16 4 6 o 6 16 16 , 3 5 33 10 6 3 3 22 1 I 141 117 101 197 10 I 235 121 22' 461 841 I 121 113 111 195 61 195 10 I 181 391 754 I 41 238 131 255 81 240 51 296 301 1029 I 6 I 284 II 251 71 389 4' 334 251 1265 I 51 337 , 1 395 6 I 328 81 385 211 1445 I 31 375 41 326 41 262 11 216 121 12U I 01 252 31 229 01 177 21 207 51 165 ANOD. COCHTr BJ:QJI1Q,Y DDAltTXZNT Weather lXo.tly Clear T1lA7P%C DODlZDDltl SKCT%CIlIl Study N.... TXC"lI C......tec! bylAml &Dc! ClaI:>a T1lA7P%C snlDY Site Cod.e I ,UI0202 Beare! . Start Date. 07/U/" u Ita;-e I 3 ) Vehicle group 1 1 CSAII 71 (&an.0Il Blvd) IC~.t Slte Rd. 1 CSAII 71 (&an.0Il Blvd) 1 133rc! Ave. N1f 1 Pro. North I Proa ....10 I Pro. South Iproa We.t Start ,- IXntvllZXclul%nclu Tu.. , U..ht Thru Left BKAVY Illl..ht Thru Left BKAVYllll..ht Thru Left BKAVYllll..ht Thru Left EEAVYITotallTotallTotal I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I 201001 10 U 0 11 0 0 0 01 0 II , 01 , 0 . 01 ltOI 11 lU 201151 3 51 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 ,. 10 01 6 0 2 01 1661 01 166 20.301 . U 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 It 10 21 5 0 2 01 1611 21 166 20..51 6 53 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 " 7 11 4 0 . 01 1721 11 171 Houri 23 234 0 11 0 0 0 01 0 351 36 31 24 0 12 01 u61 .1 U2 I I I I I I I 211001 6 57 0 11 0 0 0 01 1 " 2 11 1 0 0 01 1661 21 164 21.151 . 5' 0 01 1 0 0 01 0 124 6 21 7 0 . 01 2071 21 205 21.301 . 74 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 U 7 01 1 0 5 01 1101 01 110 21..51 7 51 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 67 2 21 . 0 1 o 1 1411 21 13' Houri 21 241 0 11 1 0 0 01 1 377 17 51 13 0 10 01 U.I 61 611 I I I I I I I Total I 251 6413 I. 2331 II 31 124 71 136 660' 442 2341 442 U 251 141154771 4I111.,U " Apr. I 3.7 n.7 1.1 3.21 35.2 12.. ".6 2.11 1.1 U.O 5.' 3.11 5'.. 3.' 34.7 1.11 -I -I " %nt.1 1.6 41.1 0.5 1.51 0.5 0.2 0.1 -I 0.1 .2.7 2.1 1.51 2.1 0.1 1.6 -I -I -I '. / " J PC.Warrant8 Traffic Signal Warrant Analy.i.. Version 3.04 Page 1 Warrant Study Data File, C:\PETRA2\~TAF%LE\TMC9618.WAR; Time of Report: 08/02/1996; 08:28:42 Major Street Approaches: 'hbound: , ,-..ri 78 (Hanson Blvd) Data File: C:\PETRA2\~TAF%LE\TMC9618.PDF Count Type: IMC. Channel: o. Count Date: 7/29/96 Number of Lanes: 1 Approach Speed, 55 Total Approach Traffic: 7187 Sout.hbound: CSAH 78 (Hanson Blvd) Data File: C:\PETRA2\DATAFILE\TMC9618.PDF Count Type: IMC. Channel: o. Count Date: 7/29/96 Number of Lanes: 1 Approach Speed: S5 Total Approach Traffic, 6830 - , Minor Street Approaches: Eastbound: 133rd Ave. NW Data File: C,\PETRA2\DATAFILE\TMC9618.PDF Count Type: IMC. Channel: O. Count Date: 7/29/96 Number of Lanes: 1 Approach Speed: 40 Total Approach Traffic: 729 Westbound: Compost Sit.e Rd. Data File. C:\PETRA2\DATAFILE\TMC9618.PDF Count Type: IMC. Channel: o. Count Date, 7/29/96 Number of Lanes: 1 Approach Speed: 0 " Total Approach Traffic: 243 / Analysis of 8-Hour Volume Warrants (criteria refers to high volume side street for that hour) : Hour I Main Side Warrant 1 I Warrant 2 I Warrant 8 Begin (Total) Vol. Dir. Rank Meets? Criteria I Meets? Criteria I Meets? Criteria 0 0 0 W 17 105 I 52 I 84 1 0 0 W 18 105 I 52 I 84 2 0 0 W 19 105 I 52 I 84 3 0 0 W 20 105 I 52 I 84 4 0 0 W 21 105 I 52 I 84 5 0 0 W 22 105 I 52 I 84 6 1041 76 E 2 MAIN 105 I--BOTH-- 52 I MAIN 84 7 1054 93 E 1 MAIN 105 I--BOTH-- 52 --BOTH-- 84 8 749 39 E 10 MAIN 105 I MAIN 52 MAIN 84 9 636 46 E 5 MAIN 105 I MAIN 52 MAIN 84 10 695 41 E 7 MAIN 105 I MAIN 52 MAIN 84 11 782 30 E 15 MAIN 105 I MAIN 52 MAIN 84 12 734 46 E 6 MAW 105 I MAIN 52 MAIN 84 13 777 41 E 8 MAIN 105 I MAIN 52 MAIN 84 14 709 32 E 14 MAIN 105 I MAIN 52 MAIN 84 15 983 33 E 13 MAIN 105 I MA%N 52 MAIN 84 16 1204 36 E 11 MAIN 105 I MAIN 52 MAIN 84 17 1377 50 E 4 MAIN 105 I MAIN 52 MAIN 84 18 1149 66 E 3 MAIN 105 1-- BOTH-- 52 MAIN 84 19 807 41 E 9 MAIN 105 I MAIN 52 MAIN 84 20 656 36 E 12 MAIN 105 I MAIN 52 MA%N 84 21 664 23 E 16 MAIN 105 I MAIN 52 MAIN 84 22 0 0 W 23 105 I 52 84 23 0 0 W 24 105 I 52 84 PC-Warranes Traffic Signal Warrane Analysis, Version 3.04 Page 2 Warrant Study Data File: C,\FETRA2\DATAFILE\TMC961B.WAR; Time of Report, OB/OZ/1996; OB,ZB:4Z Warrane SUmmary: Rural values apply. w~ nt 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volumes ) SATISFIED. Required values reached for 0 hours. Criteria--Main Se.: 350; Side St.: See Volume Summary. Warrant 2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic NOT SATISFIED. Required values reached for 3 hours. eriteria--Main St., SZS; Side St., See Volume Summary. Warrant 3 - Minimum Pedestrian Volumes NOT SATISFIED. ped volumes too low. eriteria--190 Peds in peak hour. 100 peds in 4th high hour. Warrant 4 - School Crossing NOT APPLICl\BLE. Gap data has not been defined. Warrant 5 - Progressive Movement NOT SATISFIED. Adjacent signals closer than 1000 feet and/or not part of coordinated system. Warrant 6 - Accident Experience NOT SAXISFlEO. 0 correctable accidents is fewer than required S. Correctable Accidents: 0: Right Angle Accidents: 0; Left Turn Accidents: 0; Other Accidenes: o. Warrant 7 - Systems Warrane NOT SATISFIED. At least one street has no major approaches. Peak hour eotal entering volume: 1445. _ ApproaChes which are part of the principal through traffic roadway network. _ Approaches which include rural or suburban highways outside. entering or traversing a city. _ Approaches which appear as a major route in an official transportation plan. Warrant 8 - Combination of Warrants NOT SATISFIED. Required values reached for 1 hours. Criteria--Main: 420; Side: See Volume Summary. Warrant 9 - Four ~\SATISFIED. ) Warrant 10 - Peak Hour Delay NOT SATISFIED. Peak hour (1700 hoursl volume not adequate. Criteria--Main St.: 800 (4 approaches), 650 (3 approaches); Side St.: 100. Hour Volumes Required values reached for 3 hours. Warrant 11 .. Peak Hour Volume SAT%SFIED for Z hours. j , ~ - - D - lJl lJl 1lI 1lI E E :J \0 :J .-4 ""'" ,...-- .-4 0 % 0 :) :) l... - l... :J :J 0 0 I r Dol; I I I .::.I. LD - l... IU L:> :J 1lI 0 0. u.. ... -;--:- ... -' 0') .... +-' +-' / (J) c C r'1IlT< - IU IU 7 "1)t) l... l... /~; l... l... IU IU f-- ::I ::I / s:-' ao~ - / 'I / / - / 7 / / / - / / ~ .. ~ ~ ~ i ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ \0 il -' . ~ 1; .. s j 0 i 0 ~ '" , T I ~ ..... 0. :) '0../ lJl 1lI 0 J: 0 U N IU -' 0 l... 0. n. <J: 0 J: +-' 0 0 0 m -' '+- 0 .-4 IU 0 ..... 0 0 l- ea . ..... (f) l... 0 0 '--' 0 IU \0 I: o o T o o \0 o o LD (Hd() ) o .0 T LfJeO .Add~ o o ("') . IO() o o N . ~S o o o o c5'l ..... } ~D~H .AOU~W ~ COUNT NORTH APP. #1= NB CSAH 78 ,PP. #2 =EB 133rd Ave APP. #3- SB CSAH 78 APP. #4=WB Compost Site Rd. DATE: 7/31/96 LOCATION: CSAH 78 (Hanson Blvd) @ 133rd Ave.lCompost Site Rd. I APP'L ~40 ~2pH APP. APP. #1 #3 55 MPH 55 MPH I:P'I HEAVY VEHICLE- ANY VEHICLE HAVING MORE THAN FOUR TIRES TOUCHING THE PAVEMENT A. TRUCKS- A HEAVY VEHICLE INVOLVED PRIMARILY IN THE TRANSPORT OF GOODS OR IN THE DELIVERY OF A SERVICE. B. RV- A HEAVY VEHICLE OPERATED BY A PRIVATE MOTORIST AND INVOLVED IN THE TRANSPORT OF RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT OR FACILITIES. C. BUSES- A HEAVY VEHICLE INVOLVED IN THE TRANSPORTATION OF GROUPS OF PEOPLE. PEDESTRIANS HEAVY VEHICLES TIME APP.#l APP. #2 APP. #3 APP. #4 15 MIN TOT TRUCKS RV BUS 6:00-6:15AM 2 1 6:15-6:30 5 1 6:30-6:45 5 1 6:45-7:00 6 2 HOURLY TOTAL HOURLY TOTAL 23 7:00-7:15 4 4 7:15-7:30 1 1 2 8 8 7:30-7:45 9 1 4 7:45-8:00 5 1 HOURLY TOTAL 2 HOURLY TOTAL 44 8:00-8:15 9 3 8:15-8:30 7 8:30-8:45 1 1 13 2 '. 8:45-9:00 12 1 1 tiOURL Y TOTAL 1 HOURLY TOTAL 48 9:00-9:15 6 1 9:15-9:30 10 1 9:30-9:45 9 9:45-10:00 7 HOURLY TOTAL HOURLY TOTAL 34 10:00-10:15 7 1 10:15-10:30 13 1 3 10:30-10:45 10 2 10:45-11 :00 7 11 HOURLY TOTAL HOURLY TOTAL 55 11:00-11 :15 14 11:15-11:30 2 5 11 :30-11 :45 9 1 11:45-12:00 12 1 HOURLY TOTAL HOURLY TOTAL 44 12:00-12:15 4 1 12:15-12:30 5 1 3 12:30-12:45 12 4 12:45-1:00 10 1 HOURLY TOTAL HOURLY TOTAL 41 1:00-1:15 14 / 1 :15-1 :30 10 1 :30-1 :45 8 1 1 :45-2:00 11 1 HOURLY TOTAL HOURLY TOTAL 45 COUNT ~ NORTH APP. #1= NB CSAH 78 , ,.PP. #2 = EB 133rd Ave. APP. #3- SB CSAH 78 APP. #4= WB Compost Site Rd. DATE: LOCATION: CSAH 78 (Hanson Blvd)@ 133rd Ave/Compost Site Rd. I APPoL ~40 ~PH APP. APPo #1 #3 55 MPH 55 MPH 1:.01 7/28/96 HEAVY VEHICLE- ANY VEHICLE HAVING MORE THAN FOUR TIRES TOUCHING THE PAVEMENT A. TRUCKS- A HEAVY VEHICLE INVOLVED PRIMARILY IN THE TRANSPORT OF GOODS OR IN THE DELIVERY OF A SERVICE. B. RV- A HEAVY VEHICLE OPERATED BY A PRIVATE MOTORIST AND INVOLVED IN THE TRANSPORT OF RECREATIONAL EaUIPMENT OR FACILITIES. C. BUSES-A HEAVY VEHICLE INVOLVED IN THE TRANSPORTATION OF GROUPS OF PEOPLE. PEDESTRIANS HEAVY VEHICLES TIME APP.#1 APP. #2 APP. #3 APP. #4 15MINTOT TRUCKS RV BUS 2:00-2:15PM 11 1 2:15-2:30 10 1 2:30-2:45 5 1 2:45-3:00 9 1 HOURLY TOTAL HOURLY TOTAL 39 3:00-3:15 4 3:15-3:30 13 3:30-3:45 9 1 3:45-4:00 5 HOURLY TOTAL HOURLY TOTAL 32 4:00-4:15 6 4:15-4:30 8 4:30-4:45 6 1 \ 4:45-5:00 4 1 r10URL Y TOTAL HOURLY TOTAL 26 5:00-5:15 5 5:15-5:30 9 5:30-5:45 5 5:45-6:00 7 1 HOURLY TOTAL HOURLY TOTAL 27 6:00-6:15 3 6: 15-6:30 4 6:30-6:45 4 6:45-7:00 1 HOURLY TOTAL HOURLY TOTAL 12 7:00-7:15 7:15-7:30 2 1 7:30-7:45 7:45-8:00 2 HOURLY TOTAL HOURLY TOTAL 5 8:00-8:15 1 8:15-8:30 1 1 8:30-8:45 1 8:45-9:00 1 HOURLY TOTAL 1 HOURLY TOTAL 3 , 9:00-9:15 1 1 / 9:15-9:30 2 9:30-9:45 9:45-10:00 2 HOURLY TOTAL HOURLY TOTAL 6 ) WARRANT REQUIREMENTS r , , J r " . J I4i 001/013 02/26/97 11:54 FAX 612 754 3532 ANOKA CO HWY DPT '1 c. WARRANTS 4C-l Adyancr Engllleerillg Dall Requlml . \ comprehensive Invesligation of traffi~ conditions and physical '....iraclrristies of the IOClllioll b required to c1etermlne the necessity for a signal installation and to furnish Ilecessary data {or the prOper dC3iSllllnd operation of a signal that is found to be warranted. Such data desirably 5hould include: 1. The number of vehIcles entering the intersection in each hour from each approach during 16 consecutive houCI of a rcpmemative day. The 16 hours selected should contain the iCeatest percentage of the 24-hour traffic. 2. Vehicular volumes for each traffic movement from each approach. classified by vehicle type (heavy trucks, passenger cars and light trucks. public-tran5it vehicles and, In some locations, bicycles), during each I S-minute period of the two hOllrs in the morning and of the two hours in the afternoon durms which total traffic !lItering the intersection is sreatest. 3. Peclestrian volume counts on each crosswalk during the same periOdS as the vehieular counu in paragraph (2) abOve and also during hours of . highest pedestrian volume. Where young or elderly persons lIced spccJal " iconsideration, the pedestrians may be classified by Iteneral observation aM recorcled by age groups as follows: (II) uncler 13 years (b) 13 to 60 years (c) over 60 yean. 4. The as-pereentile speed of all vehicles on the uncontrolled approaches to the IDeation. S. A conditions diagram showing details of the physical layout. Inr-,.'cting SUch features as intersectional geometries, channelization, B-_ ). si8ht-distllnc:c remictions, buS nops Md routings, parking conditions, pavement marlcingt. street lighting, driveways, loc::atlon of nearby railroad crossings, distance to nearest sillnals. utility poles and fixtures, and adjacent land use. 6. A collision diagram showing accident experience by type, location, direction of movement, severity I time of day, date, and day of week for at least one year. The fOllowing data are also desirable for a more preeise undcntllnding of the operation of the intersection and may be obtained dmini the periods speci fied in (2) above: :} I. Vehicle-seconds deJay determined separately for each approach. MN 4C-1 2/11 .-.....,.,.._~_. . . ~:} . " , . ~<I' 7671 ~ I:S a.<./ " J '" ..r." EdlOllloI Change R....6 :;':'::.h'::/t;..:;\~::~: ;i'.:;~; ~. 'l:. ':::.:.: ..1.:.. ,":" . ,.... ,., . "'I'::~~:;:. :il;:~:..,i;!.(:H\:': . . . ,. ." .'I...~. ...., .... . :" I",.. .:::.1--1; ': .::......~. :.~'.; i .: . .:.~ '::. i';' .. l<l.~;.~:.<.,_'..~~)~::"'~':' ::'n.~./:;. I:' ',. ...... ... 02/26/97 11:55 FAX 612 754 3532 ANOKA CO HWY DPT 2. The number and distribution of saps in yehicuhu traffic on the major street when minor-street traffic rmds it possible to UH the intersection safely. '). The ll.5.percentile speed of vehicles on controlled approaches at a . . vOint near to the intersectioQ but unaffected by the control. 4. Pedestrian delay time for At least two Jo-m1nute pcak pedestrian. dday periOds of an average weekday or like periods of a Saturday or a Sunday. Adequate roadway capacity at a signalized intersection is desirable. Widening of both the major Street and the minor street may be warranted to reduce the delays caused by assignment of riglu-o"r'way at Intersections controlled by traffic signals. Widenina of the minor lUeet is often beneticial to operation on the major street because it reduces the green time that must be assigned to minor street traffic. In urban areas, the effect of widetlins can bc achicycd by elimination of parking at intersectional approaches. It is always desirable to have at least two lanes for moving traffic on each approach to a signalized intersca:ion. AdditIonal width may be necessary On the leaving side of the intersection, as well as the approach lidc, in order to dear traffic through the intersection effectively. Before an intersection is widened. the additional green time needed by pedestrians to cross the widened streets should be checked to ensure that it will not exceed the green time saved through improved vc:hiculllt flow. 4C-1 WarnlllS for Traffic SlgIII' Installation Traffic control signah should not be installed unless one or more of the ligna} warrants in this Manual are met The satisfaction or a warnmt or warrants is not ill itsel! justification for a 5igtlll. Wormation should be ' "ned by means of engineerinl: studies and compared with tlae require- J......u set forth in the warrants. The engineering study should indicate tbe installation of II traflic ligual wiIJ Improve tbe overall safcry ~d/or OperatiClll of tbe intersection. If theses requirements are not lDel, II lTaffic IipaI MlOllld neither be put into opention nor contUlued in operation [If already insWlc:d), See Section 4C-12. Cnteria for Retaining or Removing ExIsting Signal Control. For Iht purpose of warranting ~igna\U:ation. a wide.medlan intersection should be considered as one intersection. When a traffic control signal is indicated as beine warranted, it is presumed thaI the signal and all related traffic control devices and markings are installc:d according to the standards set forth in this Manual. II is further presumed that signal indication. ar(l properly phucd. that roadways are properly designed. that adjacent traffic !Ianals are properly coorClinated. that there is adequate superviSion of the operation and maintenance or the ligna! and aU of Its related devices. and that the traffic loiN 4C-Z 2181 :_.",,-...~. n;,..:' " j , 1V.101,e) "'.5 '. IV-II '0) ..... :I 'n , I I4J 0021013 .~. ? .. :.:.... " . .f'Zo.i~" .,-:...... .;.....:1 : ~~ ;.:~~U~. ..: ':., '. . '. *W~~f;~~i::i';.:>;~'~:);:: ~~.:;,..::. '. :...i:r~~"'~ ij;.:....;',. ...., ..... 02/26/97 11:~6 FAX 612 754 3532 ANOKA CO HWY DPT '] signal controller will be selected on the basi$ of ensineerinl study aud judgment. . An in~estiption 01 the need for traffie signal control should include 'ere Appli~blc, At lea.st an analysis of the factors contained in the ' .\lUOWinll warranu! Warrant I-Minimum vehicular volumc. Warrant 2-Interruption of continUOl1$ traffic. Warrant 3-Minimum pedestrian volume, Warrant 4-SchooJ crmsing5. Warrant S-Progrcssive movement, Warrant 6-Accident experience. . Warrant 7-Systcms. Warrant 8-Combinatlon of warrants. Warrant 9-Four Hour Volumes. IIV-alcl Warrant IO-Peak Hour Delay. ~-ao.(.) Warrant Il-Peak Hour Volume. IV. The analysis $hould consider the effec:ts of the right turn vehicles from the minor Jtr~t approaches. Engineering judgmen( should be used to determine what. if any. panion of the risht turn traffic Is subtracted from IV-II leI a...s . ... the minor Street traffic coun( when evaIuatinll the count a,Ainlt the abovc , warrants. 4C-3 Warrant 1. Minimum Vehlelllar Volumc The Minimum Vehicular Volume warrant is intended for application where the volume of intersecting traffie is the principal reason for COnSideration of signa) installation. The warrant is satisfied when, for eaeh of any 8 hours of an avemge clay, the traffic volumes given in the table below exist on the major strcct and an thc higher-volume minor- street approach to the intersection. An "average" day is defined as a '-day reprcsenting traffic volumes nonnally and repeatedly found at t. .ocation. , MINlMt.lM VEHICULAR. V Ol..1JMES FOR. W AltRANr 1 Numbtr 0( lines ror IllO\'in, tnme on eaeh apprc.ch Major Sl~el Mi..". S'NO' V.hidet per hoor Oft major Sl~t (lOIII1 01' both epp.-<b..) V.hicla per hour on hip.MlDlume minor- II~.I IPJlI'*dI (on. di=1iol1 only) 10% 709lo ) 1..__'_M" 1______ .soD 3SO 150 IllS ~ or IflQCV. 1.._.__.... 600 420 150 105 2 Or more. :Zorm~ 600 42D ~ 140 1...._._-.. 1 Or more. .soo 350 :zoo 140 MH 4C-3 2111 .:'I;~....~.- .... ..~- ~-'/":' ! ': ;~-~~ . . _. 141003/013 . . I(~ . ~ :: : ., '. ~Il"th\.. . '.' . "''','''-1:.'. i.m"'~.:.:" ~. . ~~~-f~~':" t..;'."; I . .';,,.. , d. ',' ..... . I::": ",', .'. . , .' ;..:. . . " it. . ',.,'f ~ . ~. ..: " 02/26/97 ANOKA CO HWY DPT 11:56 FAX 612 754 353% These major-street and minor-street volumes are for the same 8 houTS. During those 8 hours, the direction of higher volume on the minor street may be on one approach durins some hours and on the opposite approach ' IrinS other hours. I . "When the lls.perccntilc speed of major-5U~~t 1nl1Iic: exceeds 40 mph in either an urban or a rural area. or when the inter~etiDll lies witIUA the built-up area of an isolated community havicg a populalioD of less ChID 10,000, the MinimubI Vehicular Volume warranl is 70 pcrCCQt of the requiremenLS above. 4C-4 Warrant 2, Interruption of Contlnlloas T~ftic The InterruJltion of Continuous Traffic ....arrant Bpplies to operating conditions ""here the traffic volume oc a major meel is 50 heavy that traffic on a minor intersecting street suffers excessive delay or hazard in entering or croumg the major street. The warrant is satisfied when, for each of any 8 hours of an averas. day, the ustfie volumes giveJI In the table below exist on the major street and on the hiRher-volume minor- street approach 10 the intersection, and the signal installation will not seriollsly disrupt progressive traffic: now. MINlMIJM VEHlCtJL\R VOLUMes POR WAJUWa' 2 Number or lines ror mclYinc traer!: 01 carh Ippm.arh v.Il;.... pe' ....ur ... IIIljor strcet (IOlal of barh IJ'Proarhc:s) Vehicles per hour Oft Ilipcr...xumc mlnoz. street IJlllroa~h (OIIe CliRClion onJ1) Mijor Stnet Miaor Sercel "ltlS "K 1____. 1.,._.__ 7SO m 'IS n , 2 or more. 1._..._ 900 630 7S 52 / 2 Or more. I Dr /lIOn:.. 900 630 100 70 1.._.____ 2 or llIore. 7SO 515 100 ?O ThBI! major-street and minor-street volumCIII are for the same 8 hours. During those 8 hours, the direction of highl!t volume on the minor street may be on one approach durin: some hours. and on the opposite approach during other hours. When the 8S-percentile speed of major.street traffic: exceeds 40 mph in either an Urban or a rural area, or when the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated communlty having a population of less than 10,000, the Interruption of Continuous Traffic warrant is 70 pert;cnt of the requirements above. MN 4C-4 2191 .... ...._......,......I.~1*""' _......."~..:_.., ........ ...., . J "' '.' . :i~'~i . '::-,', ...., . ) I4i 004/013 ... .';}i~):;'4N~~ '; :'h]:'::~,;r'i, . L ..,' 1 :,' \:".., ',:(:' ;:<:.\j~:,\, . ;' ~ !:!~':.'i:.'!':;'" .. ~ I '. . . ",... l.j:t.: .~-~,;. . . ,. ~.~; ~i:' f. " . .' '. '~:\oj,., .;, .' ,. :"::":',' " .... ."" .. '-!::Il' ' ~ ~ i} . ..:~ . 'i.~,~~,,~: .; .... .' ~:::;':::.~':..;:',;' ':,;~:~;?';i;<,,' . :.1 02/ 26/97 11:56 FAX 612 754 3532 ANOKA CO HWY DPT J 4C-5 Warnnt 3, Minimum Prdestrian Volume A trafl'ic signal may be warranted where the pedestrian volume crossing the major streel at an intersection or. mid-block IDeation during an average 'is: j " 100 or more for tach of any fOur hours; or 190 or more during anyone hOur The pedestrian volume crossing the major street may be reduced u much as ~O percent of the values given above when Ihe predominanl pedestrian crossing ~peed b below 3,~ (eet per second. In addition to a minimum pedestrilln volume of thai stated abOVe. Ihere shall be less than 60 gaPS per hour in the traffic stream of adcq\late Icngth for pedestrians to CrOss during Ihe same period when the pedestrian volume crllerlon is '3tisfied. Where there is a divided street having a median of sufficient widtn for the pedestrlan(~) to wail, the requiremellt applies separately 10 each direction of vehicular Iraffie, Where coordinated traffic signals on each side of the Itudy location provide for platooned Iraffic which result in fewer than 60 gaps per hour of adcquate length for the pedeslrians to cross the street, a traffic signal may nOI be warrantcd. -'. This warrant applies only 10 those 10c:aliollS where lI'Ie di:iUlnce to the l.carest ttafiic signal along the major street is greater thaD 300 feet and '. where it DeW lraffle signal at the study location would Dot uDduly restrict platooned flow of traffic. Curbside paridDg at non.intCI"sectlot1 locations should be prohibited for 100 feet in advaDcc of and 20 feet beyoad the crosswalk. A signal installed under thIs warrant should be of the traffic-acluated Iype wilh push buuons for pedeltrians crossing the main street. If such a signal is installed wilhin a signal syslem. it should be coordinated if the signal system is coordinated, "'~'lals installed according to this warrant shall be equipped with p'. /rian indications coMorminll to requirements set forth in other seclions of this Manual. 4C-6 Warrant of. S~hooI Crossing A traffic conlrol signal may be warranted at an established school crossing when a traffic enaineerins study of lhe frequcncy and lIdeqllilCY of gaps in the vehicular traffic stream itS related to the number and size of groups of school children at the school crossing shows that the number of adequate saps in the trafflc sU"eam during the period whelllhe children arc usina the crossin, is less than the numbor of minuta in the same period (sec. 7A-3). ") When traffic control signals are installed entirely under this warrant: I. Pedestrian indications shall be provided at least for each crosswalk established as a school crossing. M~ <IC-S , j '''-410 te) _.5 2/91 ;l> ~005/013 ::~~:~':!' . .'::" ,..;,' : ~7'-':. , ;:'~~;~,,~.~..: I ! . -. i.':" :', ... . : : ": ~.~ " . . . i~f:f~f> " . . ,." .....:' . ".:.,!~~:r~:~(:'. :'" "::'.J 02/26/97 11:57 ~~ 612 754 3532 ANOKA CO HWY DPT 2. At an intersection, the silIlal normally should be tTllffic-llc;tUtcd. As a minimum, it should be semi.traffic-actuall:d, bUI (u11 actuation with detectors on aU approacnes may be desirable. Intersection illSlallations 'lat Clln be fined into progressIve sIgnal systems may have pretimed " .ontrol. 3. At non-intenection crossings. the signal should be pedestrian- actuated, parking and other obstructions to view should be prohibited for at least 100 feet in advance of and 20 feel beyond the crosswalk, and the installation should include suitable standard signs and pavement markings. Special police supervision and/or enforcement should be provided for a new non-intersection installation. 4C-7 WarrantS, Procressin Movemellt ProgresSive movement control somcrimes necessitates traffic signal innallations at Intersectlons where they would nOI otherwise be warranted. in order to maintain proper 1l'0upinA of vchicles and efrectlvely regUlate group speed. The Progressive Movement warrltnt is 'tasfied when: 1. On a one-way street or a street which has predominantly unidirectionaltraftic, the adjacent signals are so far apan that they do nOI provide the n=ary degree of Vehicle platooning and speed control, or 2. On a tWO-way sttee:t, adjacent signalS do not provide the necessary degree of platoonina: and ~~d control and the: proposed lIl1d ildjllCmt signals could constitute a progressive signal system. The installation of a signal according to this warrant should be based On the I"-percentile speed unless an engineering study indicates tl1at another speed is more: d~irablc. The installation of a =isnal according to this WllfTant shaull! not be considered where the resultant sia:nal spacina: would be less than rooo feet. i ..C-8 Warrant 6, Accldtllt Experience The Accident Experience warrant is satisfied when: I. Adequate trial of less restrictive remedies with satiSfactory observance anl! enforcement has failed to reduce the accident frequency; and 2. Five or more reportod accidents, of typa susceptible 10 correction by traffic signal control, have occurred within a 12-month period, each accident involving personal injury or propeny damage ilpparently excc:cding the applicable requirements for a reportable accident; and 3. There: exists II volume or vehicular and pedestrian traffic not less ihan 80 percent of Ihe requirements specified c:ithcr in the Minimum Vehicular Volume warrant, the interruPtion of Continuous Trame warrant, or the Minimum Pedestrian Volume warrant; and MN 4C-& :.... .--:.-..:".,.".. ""..' "" \ J , 141006/013 ~..,: ,i." ,; . ;", . : t....:.~ . :.).~..::; :":.::';~:' . :.r:~:'1 ~::.;,~~!~!::,,:~,'j, T"~ ." ; ; :11~1:;H' : '.: . ;' ~. :.:: :1 ~~~- : .. .. .:;. ;':~ . . '/-~.~,:, ~ .... . " . . ,!t~~~i~~~'~::g!~~,;:,;: '." ~.. I', . '. I . .;':. . !'" '- .... 1Y-17 Ie) II... S .-') 2IlI t 02126/97 11:57 FAX 612 754 3532 ANOKA CO HWY DPT "') 4. Th~ sisnal irmaUation will not serioll5ly dIsrupt progressive traffic now. Any traffic signal installed solely on lhe Accid~nt Experience warraDt should be semj.traffic-acluated (with control devices which provide Dreper ')ordinatlon if Installed at an intersection within a coordinated system) .!'nd normally should be fully traffic-ar;:tuated If Installed at an isollUcd intersection. MlNIMtlM VElUCULAR VOUJMES FOR WAJlII.ANT 6 NlIllIbor or laMa rot -villa IrIftic VoWelea 1"1' Uw oa on eaclllPllmodl VoIlIolao,..1oour OIl ~1llQmr ~ -- (\oIal or _appnllCll M~ Sift.. w-, s_ boCb "1'1'.-...) (- dincniaa OIlIy) MN 70" ~ Rev.2 II 1................. I.................. <100 * 120 ... 2 or 1IIDl". J.................. 410 336 120 &.4 MN :2 ormo.... 2ot_ .caD 336 160 112 R.v., 1.........-...... 2 or 1IlOn. <100 210 I~ 112 lNTaur.umON 01' CoN'I1NlJOUS Tumc FOR W /t.11.V.Nr 6 Numbetaflanea tor ~ tnlfic VeIliclct per flour CD on """ IpplDlcll Vehkr............. .... Ill................. .... ~or _ (\oIal or -~ M.jor SIRcI ldi......S_ 1NloIa ..-.s-) (aao dUadioa oa/y) LlN /. lOll 70" lev.2 , ................. 1.................. 6lJJ 420 60 41 MN , ... Of 1IIU'rS. I.................. 720 504 60 42 I :2 or _..., :2ormon. 720 504 10 56 I.v.' 1_............... :2 or 1IlDfe. 'llO 420 10 ~ MINIMUM PEDFSl'RlAN VOLUME !'OR W AIlRAN'I' 6 80 or more pcdUln.ns ror In1 rour houn; 0.- m or llKlfC pedCilrilns durin~ Ill)' one !lour. MN 4C-7 111M . . ,'~ . '':1 ". "::~'~ ~ : \ ./ I4J 007/013 . '" . ", ~ : 'i ~';""7' ~ ' . I ". ..,.. . , ,:,':f!i~,:;'~~,M,,'if,;,: .. .,~,: ::.,~..:...::\"::~.;" :.';r,LI.I~~~.-... ,/,. :!.../:j~~: :;,.::.:., ~.~:).,; ':'.~ ., ~.; <:' :,;~,~~~l!~;~! .' r.: I': .~.~: .:'. ':.:, ~; . '" ~ I . . : ~.. ~ ~: :;..: : ;. I .,,;. ,".:,"," ':'~:"~'~ .: , .l :'''!f!::. ....~ ~ : I '. ~I. 'i,', " '.. ...... :-z ;; ,~~ . :":~. ~. . 02/26/97 11:58 FAX 612 754 3532 ANOKA CO HWY DPT 4C-9 Wama. '. Sntems Warraat .~ traffic signal installation at some intersections may be warranted to encourage concentration and organization of traffic: now networltl. The ''StmlS WUTant is applicablc when the common Intersection of two or ...ore major routes: (I) has a totlll mstins. 01' immediately pr-ojcctcd, entering volume of at least 1000 vehicles during the peak hour of a tYDica1 weekday and has five year projected traffic volumes. based on an ensineerins study, which meet one or more of Warrants I, 2. 8, 9, and II during an average weekday: or (2) has a total exi,tinl or immediately projected enterins volume of at least 1000 vehicles for each of any five hours of a Saturday andlor Sunday. A major route as used In the above warrant has one or more of the following characteristics: I. It is pan of the nreet or hish...a)' system that SCrves 1I5 the principal network for through traffic now; 2. It includes rural Or suburban high""ays outside. entering or trBversllll! a city; 3. II appears as II major route on an official plan such as a major street plan in an urban area traffic lInd transporlation study. IV-IS reI "".5 4C-10 Warrant 8, Combination or Warrants In exceptional cases, signals occasionally may he justil'ied ~hC1"e no single warrant is satisfied bUI where Warrants 1 and Z are satisfied to the cxtcn~ of 80 percent or Inore of the Slated values. Adequate trial of other remedial meuures Which cause less delay and inconvenience to traffic ~hould precede installation of silnals under this warrant. '\ I\I-eo ICl n....5 I M%N1MUtoC VEIUCUl.AJl VOtmcES FOR WNWtNr 8 Na_. at Ianu fo. mavinc ~1lIo VoIoiolcepor_aa oa _II &ppn>a;II VebiolM per hour 011 hi~__ _jo< _ (lacoI ot _.ppm1411 ,_ Major Sttecl MiIIOt SIRcI bath applOlObca) C- ditMloa....y) ~.21 -,oS 70" J..........".... 1................. 400 280 120 14 .. 2 Cl_. 1...........1...... 4&0 n6 IZO 14 t. , 1 or 1IIOft. 2or~. 410 336 160 111 " 1...._.......... 1 or 1tWlte. 400 110 IllO 111 I MN .C-B 1/94 . ~ ;:., -. J 141008/013 "' ',' . ~~. .:. ":J:.", . :,- ;!~.:::;~;...: ~::::i.:.:.1~f.:~:{:'r':' :i .,;", . 'r. '. ": r;~ " ", . . . ~::T~Fi;::\;:;~:.;::h .' .' ". .:< ,jj;' :~;. 'i:', ~i::: 'i:i;~~:;~b!~l\~ii:~lt:;!;}~'< ':j\ li',:,;D1i:' :\;.;. :}~~~;~!:,!:'()jl:~~~!'lt1!:::'j:;: . ',', ",' ,'I.. ", ':.:-:' '.: ....t.... '1:":" " ":"\:. '~+f .:1[:;: '\. V'::/'::Ol II I 11:51$ flU Ill:.! 754 3532 ANOIA CO HWY DPT "1 I~VI'TJO/'f tIP Co/'mNUOU~ TlAPflJc FOil W ARlAHT 8 NIIl1lber or lane. ror 1nOYm.lnlllie 011 l.Ieh applDKll VclaiclH pet IIov De ...y.r _ (lo0oi ..r balb AfPl'*1lct) 70" 600 420 710 50C 710 504 600 4~O VoIll.I..... _... ~... ....... - approaoIl (... dlteolioG only) 70S 6Q 42 60 0 10 ~ to .:Id M~or Slftet Mioor SlIMt MN Rev.21 MN Rov.1 l...h............ 2 or 11)0"'. 2 Or mo",. I................ 1...._.......... 1................ 2 or 1IlOtI. 2 Or mono 4C-10.1 Warrant 9-Four Hour Volul1les Ih~ Four Hour Volume Warrant is satisfied when each of any four hours of an average day the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major StTeel (tollll of both approaches) ana tile corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher volume minor streel approllch (one direction only) all fall above the curv~ in Figure 4-7 for the exisIina combination of approach lanes. When lhe 8'th percentll~ Speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour or when the intersection lies within II buill-up area of an isolated community having a population less than 10,000, the four hour volume requirement is ,atisfied when the ploUed points referred to fall above the curve in Figure 4-8 for the e~istinll combination of approach lanes. 4C-IO.2 Warrant 10, Peak Hour Delay The peak hour delay warrant is i!ltendcd for application where traffic conditiom are such that for Otic hour of the day minor nfCCl traffic suffers ' 'ue delay in entering or crossing the major 5trl!et. The peak hOIlf delay '. -. rant is satisfied when tbe conditions given below exist for one hour (any four consecutive I S-minute periods) of an average weekday. The' peak hOllr delay warrant is met when: 1 The IOla; delay ellperienced by the traffic on one mll'o" street 3pproa~rl (one ;IircCiian onM controlled by a STO)) 'isn equals .... ':xcC(:d~ four '.'chicle-hours for a one-lane approach and live vehiclc ilO.l 'I for a :wQ-!anc approach, and 2. The volume on the same minor stre~t approach (one direction only) equals or excl!ech 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or HO vph for twO moving lanes, and 3. The total entuing volume serviced during the hour equals or exc~ds 800 vph for intersections with four (or more) approaches or 650 vph far inlrrseclion. with three approaches. MN 4C-a.1 1194 .. ........__...-.~...........~.... .... .1-1> " '" ) IV.4S (C) Row.. N_!Ill(el Iln4 0'. r..:;: . I . :~.; :.: I- ". 141009/013 - . ;:.':l\'~ ~ ;/;':.:. ....., .:: :;~: ~::' !'. ,. .::j . . . ! ~:: .;:: I ....., ".: '. :.' ,",:': . ~.' .;. '. .::~~. '..'-,;. . Of:':,:,[:;:::, i;'::WiJihA,;:';:i;;;~ ;:;r,.:;,. .'. 0:(1... .~...~r-18b:I:.F.I'..:'"h~":~,-.J:.I.:, '. .... '.: .'. ';.:;'11"."'....:,: "":;j';; ..;..... . ;. ''''1 t'.~I.... -I!..: !I:'II'! '.'~ : .. . .::~.!t:~.:.~:<~; ~;1';.;.(:~":: ..~~.I'I'll.~:.l.... .I....:~. 1.~11 . ~ .~~':;~.tir:!.: :''!.':'~~'Y..\: ..1....; . ..(~~~I;t,:?',i;,: "'.; " V~, ~VI 01 iL.v~ r~ O~~ 1~4 J~J. &'IUIU\ I..U tun 111'1 4C-l0.3 Warranl 11, Peak Hour Volume The peak hour "oJum~ Warrllnl Is also Imended for application when traffic conditions are such that for one hour of th~ dllY minor 5trCCltraffIc suffers undue traffic delay in entering or c:rossina the major street. ) The peak hour volume warrant is satisfied when the plotted point representing Ille vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both apllroaches) and the c:orrcsponding vchlcle Pff hour Of the higher volume minor street approach (one direction only) for one hour (any fgur consecutive IS-minute periOds) of an avcra&c day flllls above the eUTVC in Figure 4-5 fOr the existing combination of approach lanes. When the 85th pc:rcclldle speed of major street traffic exceeds 40 mph or when the intersection lies within a built-up area of an i$o1atcd commWlity having a population less thllll 10,000, the peak hour volwne requirement is satisfied when tbe plotted point referred to above falls below the curve in Figure 4-6 fOr the exaling combination of approach IlUll:S. 4C-11 Factors GO'\'rning Selection of Type of Conllol The principal factors thaI maylcad to the favorable consideration of uartic-actualed conlrol in the selection of the lype of signal control include: I. Low, fluctuating or unbalanceclttaffic volumes. 2. High side SHeet Irame volumes and delays only during the peak hours. 3. The pedestrian l'lr accident ""arrant i~ the only warrant Which is met. 4. The inSlallaliCln is 10 provide for one-way mOVemCJ'l1 of two-WilY name. 5. The installation is at a non-intersection locatil'ln. , GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE MN 4C-8.2 '/83 " J IY-2Q tel R.._ .. IgJU1U/U1J , . .~"f: I' . :':'. :", , .' ":'\:".:' ::....i:. ".~.... ,,"~:" .~.:i'~~i;~I':t,I. .,'. .. ..,;. " '.' ".' . . . 't1!ij~ll'i~i~~I~!~~r;'-ii'. 02/26/97 11:59 F.~ 612 754 3532 JUly 1,1994 ANOK:\, CO HWY DPT "'l TRAFRe ENGINEERING MANUAL ) 9-4.00 (Continued) 94.03.04 Flxf!d-tJmefPretimsd) Sign.als A fixed-time signal is Ol'lt in which all the Intervals have a predetermined length, Therefore, the phase lenglhli and the cycle length are also fixed, Fixed.time signals are generally used in downtown Or urban areaG where epeads all:J IQW and the traffic demand is lairty constant. 9-4.03.05 ActListed Slenals An actuat9cl signal Is one whoe operation varies, within limits, according to input Irom vehicle detectors. Some IntervalS are of fixed length, and some are variable. For instance, the green interval can be extended by detector input. A iuD-actuated signal is one which has traffic detectioll on all approaches to the intersection. A semi-actuated signal is one which hu detection on liome, but not all, approaches. Actuated signals are used on arterial routes or on high-speed routes. where trallic demand varies significantly by time of day. Without actuated signals, Intersections with widely varying demand would lIllperillnce long delays during times when controller timing could not be adjusted 10 actual trftffic demands. , 9-4.03.06 Signal Coordination (See also J Section 9.6.04) It is often necessary to Consider the movement of traffIC throuoh a system of consecutive intersection$ or through an entire network, rather than throUgh a sing Is Inter1:llction. In this ~e, each signal Is considered a dependent part of a system; the goal Is to maxlmlze the emClency Of the whole system rather than anyone intsrsectlon in thll system. Types of Signal Systems A &)'51em 01 lramc signals can be made up of a number of fixed.tlme controllers. a number of actuated controllers. Or a combination of both kinds. A grouj) 01 intersection controllers Is usually interconnected by wire ortelephone circuits, though liometlmes time-Cased coordination or wireless interconnect is used. A system may hove only one operating mode, or it may have several sets 01 interval timings, combinations and/Or changes of phase sequences. automatic or manual flash control, or preemption lor emef!lency vehicles or railroads. In very sophisticated systems, the entire system and all Individual controllers can be controlled by a computer which mceives information from detectors and adjusts the signal system according to traffic demand. 1 Guidelines for Signal Coordination In general, two or more signalized intersections can be COOrdinlltlld if they erc 19$1I thftn half a mile apart, or II the travel time between them is less than a cycle length, A timlntl miSmatch of even a lew seconds between two Intersections can result in considerable delay to traffic. A time-space diagram can be constructed to show and to help coordinate signal timing at adjacent intersections. An example of a time-space diagram will be found in Figure 9.5. There are also computer programs which help plan and execute $Ignal coordination; these are diSCUSSed In section 9-11. The selection and use 01 speclfic eoordinalion equipment should take into account the nature of the area. the traffic characteristics of tile roadway, and the available capital and operating budget 9-5.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL JUSTIRCAnON AND APPROVAL PROCESS 9-5.01 General Proceclure The general prOcedure for justifying. approving. and planning the installation of a traffic signal is as follows: Engineering studies are made. The types are listed later in the chapter. :26 weeks before letting, ft signal Ju=;tiflC8tlon repcrt is submitted to Central Office Traffic for wncurrence. The Signal justification repcn may be accompanied by the projll<:t memo If tile project is just for the installation or revision of a signal. 18 weeks before lenlng, the final signal plan is submitted to Road Plans. A copy 01 the plans, the request for State-fUrnished matllrials, rllquost for special provi:!;ions, and request for agreement are submitted to Central Office Trame. 7-112 week.s before letting, the signal plan is reviawed, cOlTected. and approved by District or Metro Division persomel. The special provisions. the engineer's estimate, and the agreement Is preparud by Csntral Office Traffic personnel. , The contract is let. 9-5.02 Engineering Studies for Traffic Signals If signals are proposed for tu'l inte~oction, enough study Should be done to demonstrate the need for II signal. 9-12 141011/013 " 'J -', I .' "1 ) () .....il ') 02/26/97 12: 00 FAX 612 754 3532 l July 1, 1594 ANOIA CO HWY DPT 141 012/013 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING MANUAL 9-4.00 (Continued) j ") Studies which will be helpful in assessing and demonstrating the need lOr a signal are the following: :') Volume studies, including approach volumes, tuming movements, and peak hour detail counts; Pedestrian counls, Including any unusual numbers of children, handicapped, and elderlYi Traffic gap studies: Speed Sludies: Accident studies; Intersection delay studies. Procedures for doing various traffic studies are found In the InSlIMe of Traffic Engineers' Manual of Traffic Engineering Studies llnd in Cha~l.r 6 of Ihe Traffic Engineering Manual. The studies which ere required to be included in a sl9n~ IUS11flcalion report are discussed below, and In se~on 4C-l of the MN MUTeD. g.6.03 Werrants end Justlficlltion for SIgnals and Flashing Beacons 9-5.03.D1 Trame Signal Warrants Warrants ha-..e beon developed to delermlne /I an intersection needs some type of Intersection control. "\ JustlncaUon lor a Signalized intersection should be J based meeting one or more 01 the .stabliahed warrants as stated in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control devices. Traffic SignalS should not be installed unless one or more of the Signal warrants in the MN MUTeD are meet, but the meeting of a warrant or warrants dogs nO! alone justify the installation of a signal. The data thaI was collected as part 01 the engineering studies should be used in combination with the warrants 10 justify tho noed to install the traffic control device. The enQlneering study shOUld chow that the intersection w,lI benafrt In Improved safety and/or operation. The traffic signal warranls aro stat~ in section 4-C of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The atetemenls that follow gives Intents and interpretations of the warrants. WARRANTS 1 AND 2: Warrants 1 and :2 are the warrants that pertain to volumes, and are the most common warrant3 for jUlitlfying Intersection control, Tne same eight hour period musI be used lor both the Major and IhP. Minor StroClU. MnJOOT policy on lhe use 01 the speed reduCllon factor is that If a mainline has a pOsted speed limit of 70 km/h (45 mph) or above, that is sufficient evidence thalthp 851h percentile i:peod is above SO kmlh (40 mpn). and a speed study is not required. ) ) \ J I ) ~ ) ) ~ , , J The population reduction factor mentioned in Warrants 1 and 2 states that an intersection lying .wllhin the bUilt-up araa of an Isolated community having a population of less than 10.000..... In Ihe seven-county metropolitan area, it is often a Judgmont call whether a community ill isolated or not. There are no strict criteria on this. Geometries play an important pan in delannining tne volume requirements for Warrants 1 and 2. WARRANT 3: This warrant allows the installation of II. traffic $ignAI if there Is a consloeratlle number of pedestrians. To meet warrant 3 there must b. pedestrian voh.rnes of at least , 00 pedestrians for any of tour hours, or a peak hour volume of 190 pedestrians. These volumes can be reduced by SO percent if the CfOS$lng speed 01 the peclestrians is predominantly below 1.1 meter per second (3.5 feet/sec). A gap study must be completed to determine that lh.re are lese than 60 gOI>> of adequate length in an hour. If a signal Is warranted. the signal shoUld be traffic actuated with pedestrian indications. WARRANT 4: The Institute of Traffic Engineers' Program lor School CroSSing ProtectIOn contains the method MnlDOT recommends for addressing Warrant 4. Werram 5: A signal justification rapen addressing Warrenl 5 lihould contain a time-space diagram of the proposed intersection and nearby signals. helping 10 demonstrate thai a progressive syStem wiD help maintain platooning and group Ilpoed. Signals are installed under Warrant 5 on the basis of the 85th percentile speed, so a sp@ed study is necessary lor this warrant. It Is expected that any signal inctalllld under Warrant 5 would include interconnect. Warrant 6; The 80% requirement is not the same a5 the 80% required for Warrant B. For Warrant 6. the requirement i. 80% of Warrant 1. Werrent 2, or Warrant 3. Signal justification reports which address Warrant G are 10 include an accidenl diagram. A time-space diagram showing tho proposed lIignel sy5tem will not seriously cisrupt progressive traffic flow should be included. Discussion of the failure 0/ less restrictive remedies is also required by the MN MUTeD. Current MnlDOT policy is that in general, Warrant 6 1$ nol applicable 10 an InlersectiOn wnlCtI is ~ready signalized. 9-13 U"".. ""01 ~I ~,:u~ tftA Ol~ IJ4 J~J~ July 1, 1994 ANUM I;U !ilH lI1'T IgJU13/U1J TRAFFIC ENGINEERING MANUAL I 9-5.00 (Continued) j Warrant 7: Curren! MnlDOT inletrpretlltion of Warrant 7 is that its intent is the use of a signal to pull lrafflc away from OUler intersections. 10 encourage concentration and organization 01 traffic flow networks: Therefore, policy is that Warrant 7 does not apply 10 isolated Inter,ections, but rather to intersections in urban grid systems. Warrant 8: Warrant 8 allows the combination of any two of Warran:s 1, 2. and 3. Therefore, if a report acfdresses the combination of WarraF\t 1 Ilnd Warrant 2, the mainline criterion of Warrant 2 with the cross- street combInation of Warrant 1 is the proper combination. Note lhe MN MUTeD requiree 'adB9uale trilll of less restrictive remedies' before signalization under Warrant 8. Warrants 9-11: These warrants may not be addreued by projected or hypothetical volumes. or for as.yet-unbuilt intersections. Actual on-site sludles are required. There is not enough evidence at hand to determine a mean valu9 or 85th percentile valuu for peak hour and fourth-highest hour, particularly for sites with sharp-pllalllng dlstrlbutlons. 1) Justification for revision, of existing Traffic Control SIgnals " I A SIgnal Jusllflcatlon report snail De prepared for existing signals that are: Completely rebuilt Revised: updating to meet current IlUlndard; phase chanSles or coordination changes requiring rewIring, pOle or mast arm changes and controller change out; adding or removing an approach or turn lane to an intersection A Signal Justification Reports are not required for. Minor work caused by road construction: pole or cabinet relocation Addin.ll nlOW loops for detection ReviSing a signal head Changing out controller cabinet only for maintenance reasons . Adding Emergency Vehicle Preemption aF\d it is cbvioU3 to the traffic enjlineor that the signal meets one of the MN MUTCD warrants. Signal Removal Justification Reports shall be prepared for all existing signals that are detsrmined to be removed 2) Justlflcatlon Cnteria: Signalized intersections that meet 80 percent of the volume requirem~'"tll of MN MUTeD Warrant 1 or 2 should be considered justified, \ J Signalized Intersections mat ao not meet 80 percent of the volume requirements of Mill MUTCD Warranl 1 or 2, but meet 60 percenl of the vol\Jrne requirements of Warrant 1 lire in the gray area and should be considered for signal removal. Aadltlonal stuai&S, findings, engineering iudgement and dOCUmentation beyond the volume requirements will be needed to JU$lify retaining the signal. 51gnallzed Intersections that ao no meet 60 percent of the volume requirements of MN MUTeD Warrants 1 and meet no other Warrant chould be consid,nKl unjustified traffic control signals and shOUld be removed. The lraffic signqJ removal decision process shall be followed as sel forth in the .User Guide for Removal of Not Needed Traffic Signals,FHWA. IP-SO-12. NOVGmber 1080. In lhe traffic sllilnal removal process, the traffic engineer conSIders all the findings and the decision is made whelher or not to remove the trllffle signal. The final decillion ccmcemlng signal removal is a blend of analytical proceclure:5 lInd political consideratiOns coupled with professional judgement. However. the technlcsl findings from the anelysis should provide a S1I'Ong factual basis for reaching, supporting and defending the final decision or recommendation. All findings of the decision process shall be cummarizgd by the traffio engineer in a $ignal j'ustiflCatiOn report or a signal removal U5l1flcation report. If so determined. Ail traffic signals that are determined to be retained shall be revised to meet current standards. These traffic signalS should be prforltlzed along with other traffic signal projects and scheduled for revision as permitted. 9-5.03.02 F/lIShing BeaCOn Warrant$ flashing beacons in dude DeaCOns mounted on span wire directly over an intersection, and beaCOns mounted on pedestal above stop signs (red) and Inttrcections ahead symbol, signs (yellow), eath overhead pedestal mounted beacons have advantages and dlsaovantages. Overhead beacons maybe confused with all way flashing red signals indicating or may distract the motorist from roadway signing. but they eid the motorist in locating the intersection. Pedestal mounted beacons help draw attention to stop anlllntersection ahead signinQ, but do not help locate the intersection for thQ malnlino driver lNho sees only flashing yellow mounted on an Intllrsoction ahead sign, somewhere in advance 01 the intersection itself. Sight distance or geometry may also tend 10 favor one system over anofher. In any case. any flashing beacon must be justifiQd under ona or more of the following warrants. 9-'4 r\lnt"l.eI"W!ll61't ..n.,....... ...L..___ 6__U_ .1 -i .) '\ , 'I , .1 " i .! CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ) DATE: March 4. 1997 ITEM NO. Award Bids/Engineering Vehicle & Water Dept. Vehicle 013. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Frank Stone, fifi) Public Works AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item The bid opening for the purchase of two pickups, one % ton pickup for Engineering and one % ton pickup for the Water Department. Specifications where mailed out to 11 different dealer and we only received one bid for the % ton pickup from Main Motors. Due to only one bid, we ask that the City Council reject this bid from Main Motors for $21,032.43 for the purchase of this % ton pickup We will check with the other dealers to see why they did not bid and then re-advertise these vehicles as soon as possible. \ 1 " / TABULATION OF BIDS JROJECT: BIDS OPEN: P & S BID Ret'd BOND '.-- '.f /~ I tnv-' l' j J.f I ~' ,- TOTAL BID d / U 3 ;{. '-13 CONTRACTOR ~~ ~/l1;t"0 j Engineer's Estimate ~ .I Chevy Trucks Main Motors Sales '5 West Main Street r,noka MN 55303 612-421-2700 PREPARED BY: DUKE WEISBROD Model er11}:;)} 15s 151 A:;' (6v '" 't.~, V;:3 vn WINDOW STICKER REPORT Factory Options 4WD K2gular C;O! 8.0' SOX~ 131.5U WB Preierred Ecuip"ent Group lSH Preierred Ecuipment Group uiscount Tire Weight Ta~ - Model Cheyenne Decor Fleetside Body Code 6100 Ibs 6VW? Federal Emission Requirements No Emission O,erride Desired Vcr-tee 5(1\)0 SFi r;a (305 Cu. in.) 4-Spe2d Automatic wfGD 3.42 Rear A~le Ratio Standard Manual Shift Transier CasE Locking Diiferential Hea,y Duty Front Sorings Two Front Tow Hooks Oii-Road Skid Flate Front and Rear Hea,y Duty Shocks Cold Climate Package SEu,Singie 770 CCA Battery Standard Silver Painted Wheels P245i75R-16 Ail Terrain Blackwall Tire Weight Ta~ - Front Tires P245/75?-16 All Terrain Blackwail Tire Weight Tax - ?ear Tires 5:are Tire (Matches Rear Tire) Tire Weight Ta, - Soare Tire Cioth Eench Seat Air Ccr.di honing Coior-Keyed Rubber Floor Covering AM/PM Stereo ETR wfS&5. Digital Ciock F2inted Rear Step Bumper Biack Break-A-Wav 05?V Mirrors Front License Fiat: Bracket Fieet incentive Invoice Credit I"fl TFD R~t;ii h~;nity Dei~te ... .., ... . . ;:.0110 j'.'ali!t 1 M2:iu~ ROY21 Bite tMet) No Lower Coier HY3iiabi~ A/VtJ",,,,,,,,- (10.1> (;1:.. /0 '1<J 3 Pi;_ 1 of 2 0211111997 MSRP $ 11,242.0<:- I 0.00 NfC N/C Fackage NfC N/C N/C NiC $ 495.00 $ 970.00 N/C NfC I 252.0(1 i 63.(ii) N/C '1 95.00 $ 40.00 $ 33.00 I :,6. (I') tile ruc Nle N/C NfC NiC lifC Nie '$ t.V:'.t.HJ . . NfL NfC L>J,""J NfC liiC NiC N/C NfC 1".. IV I.- Chevy Trucks PREPARED BY: DUKE WEISBROD , j WINDOW STICKER REPORT Model Factory Ootions ,- _. - '. - i~: Jtrl~E H;~l~~:l~ Gr2';' Cloth ." .-. ~. " -... :l~ :trlOe ~Olcr H~~113ble -"._...~, ~u: I U I HL I I I . . I . I I I . . I I . . . . . I . . . I . I I . I , . . I I . . . . . . . ADJUSTMENTS ...................................... DESTINATION CHARGE............................... TOTAL FRICE II......... ,.1...." 1'1'"1"'" I...... :~. ":: ,r:; Hlgr,W;";' ... 13.~:) JIG; ar:J S:~cif::;ti:ns 3~D}E:: to Cha~g= without _,._,......1:. FeC2ral. '3t;:~ '. . - - ~: ~c:al i ;'::.;25 :.xtra. ;E';i;e:: '~2il:;~7 / . .. ) ~m ~ Of , 02/11/1997 MSRF ,L c n,"('" 1'1..' iii L $ 22.181.0(' $ $ 0.00 625.00 ----------- ----------- $ 22,806.00 MAIN MOTORS FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS Chevrolet. Cadillac dealers since 1919 = 435 West Main Street, Anoka, Minnesota 55303 = Phone (612) 421-2700 Addendum list * Color will be (96) Quicksilver metallic with gray interior-NC * Manuals for service, emmissions, driveability and electrical- $98.00(incl.) \ * Whelen model U800C high dome, flat mounted strobe-$230.00 (incl.) with a light switch- non installed * Rustproofing included at the factory-NC * Manufactures GVWR rating of 6100 may be upgraded at an additional cost of approximately $1000.00 by adding bars and springs-not included Option: ) Whelen Model #800C High Dome, Flat Mounted Strobe With a Light Switch. BIDS MUST BE STATED ON THIS FORM Failure to supply completed information called for on this form maybe cause for rejection. Total Price of Truck: Options: $ 7 . 1 ?., ",? ex / (J.J ,-,.t. "7 .;, Whelen #800C Strobe with lighted switch or equal installed. $ //Vc/ (~3c ) ~("i I...H"',,,"~ / Bid Prices Shall Include Taxes. Make {!hevLot.eT Model k600 J./>tL/ 12':'1 CJlf3- CJ:./o<j.;'; Delivery i-I;;' wecf-s (Final delivery date for completed unit) Bidder Sign Here" 2).ub VL<<./t--I Bidder Name (YIlt'''' ,.n", /'<.,-" S,!-US d:..""P."""f Address "i,5) (.k;. ~HI~ /-},,;.;iA, ..,,'" 55"3.: '? Telephone Number (r::-i;;J) ~.JI - ;17(..'C- ') State Warranty Chevy Trucks "ain "otors Sales ~ West "ain Street , ...ka"N ssm 612-421-2700 PREPARED BY: lain lotors STANDARD EQUIPMENT REPORT Order Code Description (?,L/o9'c .5 Pag, 1 of 3 0211111997 / ? k'7 {'I/IJ -------- -------------------------------------------------------------- Model C~"1(:-~(j3 ~~D ~5;cla~ C~~. 3.0" ~~~. 131.5N WB Standard Equipment CHASSIS FEATURES Battery: Heavy-Dut? 600 CeA Brar.es: ~-WhEel Anti-LacK \ Engine: Vortec 4300 Vb SFi Exnaust System: Stainless ,teei Fuel TanK: 34 Gallon Generator: 100 Amp Steering: Speed Sensitive, Power (EVa, Susoension Frt: Indeoendent Torsion Bar Suspension Rr: Multi-Leaf Springs Transmission: S-Speed "anual wiOD EXTERiOR TRiM & FEATURES Air Da~: DarK Argent Bum:e' Frt: Chrome Sumoer Rr:NOT INCLUDED WiCHEYENNE DECOR Grille: Melded, F;inted Argent He3dl;m~s: Single Rect~ngu13r H310gen Horn: Singie Note LamDs: uaytime R~n,inG Mirrors: Slack BreaK-A-Way OSRV Namepiate: Cheyenne Ba:ge on B-Pillar Plint: Single Tone Snare Tire: Full Size Tire anti Wheel Tailgate: ~erncvaDle Tc" H~Dks: Two Front ~neei;: ::l~e~ ~2inte1 ~fBlac~ Ctr. CaD Wip=r~: Int=~mi:::~t windshiEld \lii:-e H~r:1e;=: :_==-:: !:~:l=r~";; prtRI~F ,.' ,. '. -- .-.',.,-- -:-1'jKt.: & F3==e~q2r ::~:. Frcn: Chevy Trucks PREPARED BY: lain aotors ) STANDARD EQUIPMENT REPORT Order Code Descriotion Page 2 of 3 02/11/1997 -------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ~s=is: HEndl~s: ?ass:ncer Cu:~::d?r=~ - . . - . .::.' .,., .'j:", ---- _.. ~~- ~ - ~. - . :oor C2;ffiS: jlJ2 1mr3~! Deor 7riT.: MJloed ~la~:~c ~!~r~r9st Floor Ca~e~ing: CQlcr-K2~ed Rubb~r 2=j;~=: Trio Gdameter. Oii ?re;s~re alass: Solar Ray Tinted. All WIndow: He3dli'~r: CGlor-~eYed Cloth insul~ticn: UnOer Dash & Floor Covering Jacy,: With Wheel ~re~ch Lighting: uarne WiLM & PH Door Switch Man PO:KftS: Pas;e~~~r t Jriler"s UJsr Pawer Points: Dual Covered R3dio: AMjFM 3tereJ w;S&S. Clock Scotchgard: ~il Cloth & Caroet Surfaces Seat Belts: Adiu5t~bie Height. Front Seating: Vinyl Bench Steering wheel: Simuiated Leather Sunshades: Cloth Covered w/RH Mirror Warning Tone: Key-In-ignition Buzzer SAFETY FEATURES Active (Manual) Front Lao/Shoulder Belt Active (Manual) Rear Lap/Shoulder Belt Air Bags. Dual Anti-LQc~ Bra\Es~ 4-Wheel Brake Audible Wear indicator Brake/Transmission Shift int2rioc~ Center High-~ounted Stpo Lamo Child Seat Safety BElt ~etractor Crush Zones. Front and Rear Daytime Runnlng Lamps Dis: Srake;. Front Dual Hood Latcn Em~rgent~ Belt Locking Retr~ctors Energy-Absorbing Steering Column Haipgen Headlamos Head Restraints. Front L3mina!ed Wind:nieid ala:; Side Door ~eam5 Side wir.dow G~foggers. ~rcnt Slngl= . . :wc-:::e~ \ey ~YSlell \ '" Chevy Trucks PIO' 3 of 3 02/11/1997 PREPARED BY: lain lotors \ STANDARD EQUIPMENT REPORT Order Code Description -------- -------------------------------------------------------------- Windshield wioers. Intermittent SOEciiications Suoject to Ch~~ge With~ut Notice. Revised: 02/12/97 " " ) Chevy Trucks Main Motors Sales . ; West Main Street , I ""oka KN 55303 612-421-2700 PREPARED BY: lain aotors CAPACITIES Pi;' 1 of 2 02/11/1997 MODEL ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- M ~ . )' ;:DuEl ,~a!le- ............ I...... 4WD Regular Cab. 8.0' Box, 131.5' WB m0903 Mode I Cc.de ................... ~assenger Caoacity ........... ~ wEiGHT iNFORMATiON ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Front Gross Axle wt Rating ....................... Front Curb Weight ................................ Front Ootion Weight.............................. Front Reserve Axle Caoacity ...................... "'ar Gross Axle Wt Rating ..,..................... .;r Curo Weight ................................. Rear Ootion Weight ............................... Rear Reserve Axle Capacity ....................... Gross Vehicle Wt Rating .......................... As 50eced Curb Weight ............................ As Speced Payload .........,...................... Gross Combination Wt Rating ...................... 3262 1 bs 2678 los 81 Ibs 503 los 3686 I bs 1751 ios 109 Ibs 1526 Its 6UO Ibs 4619 Its 1481 I bs 10500 Ibs TRAiLERiN5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ?ail Hitch ~a:~ Trailer Weight.........."......."........ Max Tongue Loa: ..........,..................... Fifth Wheel Hitch Ma); irailer weight .........................,1,. Max !.lngoln Load............................... ., J 5~}.;(f 1 b; ,S,-)() 1 bs ::::'t::~) 1 bs 1;)00 Ibs CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL AcrION March 4, 1997 DATE AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED ~ Non-Discussion FOR AGENDA ITEM P"'nning r ~ Adopt Ordinance No. 15A BY: (To Repeal Ordinance No. 15) lore I01n=(]A .;? 4- REQUEST The City Council is asked to adopt Ordinance No. 15A. As proposed, this ordinance (MN State Building Code) would be deleted. For further information, please refer to the November 26,1996 Planning and Zoning Commission minutes , I ~ J MOTION BY: SECOND BY: Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 26, 1996 Page 9 \ ; I ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 15, MN STATE BUILDING CODE - REPEALED @ Mr. Johnson stated the Building Official has recommended this ordinance can be repealed, as that portion of the code has been incorporated with Ordinance 19. The Commission agreed. ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 17, DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS Mr. Johnson stated the Building Official and City Engineer have reviewed the ordinance. The Building Official had no comment other than the ordinance is necessary; however, the City Engineer made the following recommendations: reference to basement floor elevations should be revised to the current standards per Ordinance 10. Section 4, Surfacing: be revised to include urban and rural surfacing. Section 5, Culverts: all culverts shall be corrugated metal or equivalent. Culverts within the right of way shall meet all provisions and permit requirement from the Anoka County Highway Department. Also, the City Engineer would re3erves the right to determine the size of the culvert. Commissioner Wells suggested that large culverts be required to be screened to prevent debris from going through and to prevent children from crawling through them. Mr. Almgren stated that any culvert in the county right of way must be approved by the County Highway Department. \ This ordinance deals strictly with residential driveways. Something could be added that if the culvert is over a certain size that trash guards would be required. The Commission had no further comment. ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 18, STREET NAME CHANGE Mr. Johnson stated the City is required to make street name changes via an ordinance. The intent is to consolidate this with other street name ordinances. No change is being recommended. The Commission agreed. ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 19, MN STATE BUILDING CODE Mr. Johnson stated the intent is to consolidate Ordinance 19. The Commission agreed. OTHER BUSINESS Permanent employee Mr. Carlberg announced the City Council has authorized the permanent full-time position for a planner, so Mr. Hinzman will go to permanent full-time status as of January 1. One of his main duties will be update the comprehensive Plan. A survey of 'the residents is being planned. " / December 24 meeting: Mr. Carlberg announced that the December 24, 1996, Planning Commission meeting is being cancelled due to the holidays. \ . ORDINANCe: NO. / c~- TOYlNSHIP OF' GrtOW COUNTY OF A..."JOKA STATE OF ~INNESOTA . l~ OrtDINA..."JCE ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE.' 'The Tf)\~n Board of Grow .Township ordains: SECTION 1. ADOPTION OF STATE BUILDI~G CODE BY REFERENCE. The Grow Town Board hereby adopts by reference the MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE and all a?pcndixes thereto as filed with the 1.jinncsota Secretary of State and tne COl7u-nissioner of . A~ministration on January 6, 1972. Three copies of. said code shall be marked "OFFICIAL COPY", ke?t on file in ~he Town Cle~~'s office, and shall be open for public inspection. SECTIO~ 2. PENpLTY. Any person violating any provision of. this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and ~?on / conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine of not more ~han. three hundred ($300.00) dollars or imprisonment in .t~e County Jail for not more than ninety (90) days, or' both, plus the costs of prosecution in either or both cases. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ora~nance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. PASSED BY THE GROW .TOIYN BOARD THIS I:fv / () . day of c;~ t , 1973. Town Board Chairman . A?':lEST: .. Clerk " J Published in the Anoka County vnion on the day of ' 1973. J / \ .J CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 15A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 15 ADOPTED THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 1973, KNOWN AS AN ORDINANCE REFERENCING THE MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: Ordinance No. 15 is hereby amended as follows: Ordinance No. 15 adopted April 10, 1973 is hereby repealed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this _ day of 1997. ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER Victoria V olk, City Clerk J. E. McKelvey, Mayor CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DA TE March 4, 1997 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED toO. Non-Discussion FOR AGENDA ITEM Plmmg {~{; toO. Adopt Ordinance No. 19Q BY: (To Repeal Ordinance No. 19) Jeff Johnso as. v REQUEST The City Council is asked to adopt Ordinance No. 19Q. As proposed, this ordinance (MN State Building Code) would be deleted. For further information, please refer to the November 26, 1996 Planning and Zoning Commission minutes. , I '\ J MOTION BY: SECOND BY: Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 26, 1996 Page 9 '\ ) ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 15, MN STATE BUILDING CODE - REPEALED Mr. Johnson stated the Building Official has recommended this ordinance can be repealed, as that portion of the code has been incorporated with Ordinance 19. The Commission agreed. ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 17, DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS Mr. Johnson stated the Building Official and City Engineer have reviewed the ordinance. The Building Official had no comment other than the ordinance is necessary; however, the City Engineer made the following recommendations: reference to basement floor elevations should be revised to the current standards per Ordinance 10. Section 4, Surfacing: be revised to include urban and rural surfacing. Section 5, Culverts: all culverts shall be corrugated metal or equivalent. Culverts within the right of way shall meet all provisions and permit requirement from the Anoka County Highway Department. Also, the City Engineer would re3erves the right to determine the size of the culvert. Commissioner Wells suggested that large culverts be required to be screened to prevent debris from going through and to prevent children from crawling through them. Mr. Almgren stated that any culvert in the county right of way must be approved by the County Highway Department. This ordinance deals strictly with residential driveways. Something / could be added that if the culvert is over a certain size that trash guards would be required. The Commission had no further comment. ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 18, STREET NAME CHANGE Mr. Johnson stated the City is required to make street name changes via an ordinance. The intent is to consolidate this with other street name ordinances. No change is being recommended. The Commission agreed. @ ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 19, MN STATE BUILDING CODE Mr. Johnson stated the intent is to consolidate Ordinance 19. Commission agreed. The OTHER BUSINESS Permanent employee Mr. Carlberg announced the City Council has authorized the permanent full-time position for a planner, so Mr. Hinzman will go to permanent full-time status as of January 1. One of his main duties'will be update the Comprehensive Plan. A survey of the residents is being planned. "- / December 24 meeting: Mr. Carlberg announced that the December 24, 1996, Planning Commission meeting is being cancelled due to the holidays. CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ; ORDINANCE NO. 19N AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE: PROVIDING FOR ITS ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT: REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, ENLARGEMENT, ALTERATION, REPAIR, MOVING, REMOVAL, DEMOLITION, CONVERSION, OCCUPANCY, EQUIPMENT, USE, HEIGHT, AREA AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL BUILDINGS AND/OR STRUCTURES IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER: PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES THEREOF; PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF: AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 19 OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER. The City Council of the City of Andover does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. APPLICATION, ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT. ) The application, administration, and enforcement of the code shall be in accordance with Minnesota rule part 1300.2100 and as modified by chapter 1305. The code shall be enforced within the extraterritorial limits permitted by Minnesota statute 16B.62 subdivision 1 when so established by this ordinance. The code enforcement agency of this municipality is called the City of Andover. A Minnesota certified Building Official must be appointed by this jurisdiction to administer the code (Minnesota statute 16B.65). SECTION 2. PERMITS AND FEES. The issuance of permits and the collection of fees shall be as authorized in Minnesota statute 16B.62 subdivision 1 and as provided for in chapter 1 of the 1994 Uniform Building Code and Minnesota rules parts 1305.0106 and 1305.0107. Permits fees shall be assessed for work governed by this code in accordance with Resolution *R307-94 and as amended by the city council. In addition, a surcharge fee shall be collected on all permits issued for work governed by this code in accordance with Minnesota statute 16B.70. SECTION 3. VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES. A violation of the code is a misdemeanor (Minnesota statute 16B.69). SECTION 4. BUILDING CODE. The Minnesota State Building Code, established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 16B.59 to 16B.75, is hereby adopted as the building code for this jurisdiction. The code is hereby \ incorporated in this ordinance as if fully set out herein. ) \ j Page Two Adoptive Ordinance - Building Code A. The Minnesota State Building Code includes the following chapters of Minnesota Rules: \ J 1. Chapter 1300 - Minnesota Building Code 2. Chapter 1301 - Building Official Certification 3. Chapter 1302 - state Building Construction Approvals 4. Chapter 1305 - Adoption of the 1994 Uniform Building Code including Appendix Chapters: a. 3, Division I, Detention and Correctional Facilities b. 12, Division II, Sound Transmission Control c. 29, Minimum Plumbing Fixtures 5. Chapter 1307 - Elevators and Related Devices 6. Chapter 1315 - Adoption of the 1993 National Electrical Code. 7. Chapter 1325 - Solar Energy Systems. 8. Chapter 1330 - Fallout Shelters. 9. Chapter 1335 - Floodproofing Regulations. 10. Chapter 1340 - Facilities for the Handicapped 11. Chapter 1346 - Adoption of the 1991 Uniform Mechanical Code 12. Chapter 1350 - Manufactured Homes. 13. Chapter 1360 - Prefabricated Buildings. 14. Chapter 1365 - Snow Loads. 15. Chapter 1370 - Storm Shelters 16. Chapter 4715 - Minnesota Plumbing Code 17. Chapter 7670 - Minnesota Energy Code B. This municipality may adopt by reference any or all of the following optional appendix chapters of the 1994 Uniform Building Code as authorized by Minnesota rule part 1305.0020 subpart 2: 15, Reroofing; 33, Excavation and Grading. The following optional appendix chapters of the 1994 Uniform Building Code are hereby adopted and incorporated as part of the building code for this municipality. 1. 15, Reroofing 2. 33, Excavating and Grading C. This municipality may adopt by reference any or all of the following optional chapters of Minnesota rule: 1306, Special Fire Protection Systems with option 8a (Group M, S, or F occupancies with 5,000 or more gross square feet); 1335, F1oodproofing regulations parts 1335.0600 to 1335.1200. \ j page 2 Page Three ) Adoptive Ordinance - Building Code The following optional chapters of Minnesota rule are hereby adopted and incorporated as part of the building code for this municipality. 1. 1306 Special Fire Protection System with Option 8A. 2. 1335 Floodproofing regulations parts 1335.0600 to 1335.1200. SECTION 5. 1. Architectural Design, Exterior Facing The application for a building permit, in addition to other information required by applicable laws or regulations, shall include exterior elevations of the proposed structure amd drawings which will adequately and accurately indicate the height, size, design, and appearance of all elevations of the proposed structure and a description of the construction and materials proposed to be used. 2. Referral of Application by Inspector in Certain Cases when an application is filed with the City for a building permit for any structure to be built, enlarged, or altered within, or moved into the City, the Building Official shall review such application and accompanying documents to determine whether the exterior architectural design, appearance, or functional plan of such proposed structure, when erected will be so at variance with, or so similar to the exterior architectural design of any structure or structures already constructed or in the course of construction which is within three hundred (300') feet of the lot upon which the structure is located, or so at variance with the character of the applicable district as established by the zoning ordinance of the City as to cause a substantial depreciation in the property values of the neighborhood. The three hundred (300') foot restriction shall be determined by measurement along the street upon which the structure fronts (19K, 11-15-88) If the Building Official finds that the exterior architectural design of the proposed structure, when erected, may be so at variance with, or so similar to, the exterior architectural design, appearance, or functional plan of structures already constructed or in the course of construction in the neighborhood, no building permit therefore shall be issued and the Building Official shall within ten (10) days after receipt of the application of the building permit application and supporting documents, file the same and such opinion in writing, signed by the Building Official, with the Secretary of the Board of Design Control, which shall review the determination of the Building , Official. (19J, 3-15-88) J Page 3 J \ Page Four Adoptive Ordinance - Building Code 3. Board of Design control Created The Andover Review Committee of the City of Andover shall be and is hereby appointed as the Board of Design Control. The Board shall review all building permit applications referred to it by the Building Official upon his determination that the exterior architectural design of the proposed structure would violate the provisions of this ordinance. The Andover Review Committee shall act upon all applications or other matters referred to it within twenty (20) days from the date such application was originally filed with the Building Official. It may approve, conditionally approve or disapprove the exterior design of any proposed building or structure, enlargement or alteration and may modify, request such modifications as it may deem necessary to carry out the purpose and intent of this section. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the Andover Review Committee may take an appeal therefrom to the City Council. Such appeal shall be taken within five (5) days after the decision of the Andover Review Committee. The City Council shall act upon all application or other matters referred to it within forty-five (45) days from the date of appeal. (19I, 2-02-88) SECTION 6. A. The general contractor or home builder shall meet the improvements required under Ordinance *10 as: 1. provide four (4") inches of topsoil and sod on all boulevards in areas served by municipal sewer and water, and four (4") inches of topsoil and seed on all boulevards in other areas, and the conditions regarding hard surfaced driveways and erosion control. B. If any of the improvements required under Section 6A are not completed at the time of the final inspection by the Building Inspector, the general contractor or home builder shall furnish to the City, a security agreement in an amount equal to 150 percent of the Building Official's estimated cost for such improvements. The improvements shall be completed within 30 days of the furnishing of the security agreement, except between October 1 and May 1 and all work shall be completed by June 1. Requests for the release of any security agreements provided hereunder may be made by the general contractor or home builder upon completion of all improvements covered by the security agreement. The Building Official shall approve or deny the request. If denied, the Building Official shall state in writing the reasons for such denial. The general contractor or home builder may appeal the decision to the City Council by filing with the Building Official a written request for such appeal within ten days after receiving the Building Official's notice. The appeal shall be placed on the , agenda of the next regular Council meeting. The general , / contractor or home builder shall be notified of the time and place of such meeting. The Council may affirm or reject the decision of the Building Official. page 4 Page Five \ Adoptive Ordinance - Building Code ) C. The security referred to in this ordinance may be in the form of cash, money order, cashier's check or irrevocable letter of credit. D. If the improvements for which a security agreement has been given are not completed within a thirty (30) day period, the builder shall forfeit the security agreement and the City shall proceed to complete the improvements and collect the costs thereof from the security. E. If proof of other security is provided by the general contractor or home builder the above security will not be required. F. For the purposes of this ordinance, the term "boulevard" shall mean the area of a public right-of-way extending from the back of the curb, or the edge of a roadway where no curb is installed, to the right-of-way limit. (19H, 1-12-88) J This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 4th day of April, 1995. CITY OF ANDOVER If !::lC~ Mayor ATTEST: v~vfr(& City Clerk Amended thru 19N, 4- 4-95 " / page 5 , , ) \ , / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE No. 190 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 19, AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: Ordinance 19 is amended as follows: Section 3.C. ds. Section 3. D. If any of the improvements required under Section 3C are not completed at the time of the final inspection by the Building Inspector, the general contractor or home builder shall furnish to the City, a security agreement in an amount equal to 150 percent of the Building Official's estimated cost for such improvements. The improvements shall be completed within 30 days of the furnishing of the security agreement with the exception of rovidin four (4") inches of to soil and sod on all boulevards in areas serve y munlclaa sewer an jor water an our 4') inches of topsoil and see on all boulevards in other areas at time of certificate of occupancy, except between October 1 and May 1 and all work shall be completed by June 1.... Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 5th day of September , 19 95. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: . :: r ff'e.' J( ~./ /0 E McKelvey, Mayor U~t!LL Victoria volk - City Clerk \ j ('il~ of .\ntlm IT ('ounty of .\noka St..tc of :\Iinncsot.. Onlin..nce 191' / AN ORI>1NANCE AMENI>1NG ORDINANCE NO. 19N, KNOWN AS THE BUILI>1NG ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: Ordinance No. 19N, is hereby amended as follows: Section 7, WDE site L-No l:nclosed structure shall bl: built within 200 feet of the limit of refusl: disposal at the WOE Qualitied Facility as depicted as Line F in the Attached Exhibit A (Exhibit A is a drawing of the WDE Qualitied Facility). l:xcept for anv propertv north of Coon Creek. \ ~For any enclosed structure to be erected \vithin 200 feet to 500 feet of the limit of refuse disposal at the WDE Qualitied Facility as depicted in Exhibit A. excludin(: propertv north of Coon Creek. (the line 500 feet distant from the limit of refuse disposal is depicted as Line F) the property owner shall. prior to construction of the structure. install a soil gas monitoring probe located between the structure and the limit of refuse disposal at the WDE Qualified Facility. The soil gas monitoring probe shall be of a design approved by the Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ("'Commissioner"). and shall be installed in a location approved by the Commissioner. The soil gas monitoring probe shall be installed by a water well contractor licensed in the State of Minnesota. Installation of a soil gas monitoring probe pursuant to this paragraph shall not be required if the Commissioner. in his sole discretion, determines that an existing soil gas monitoring probe located in between the proposed enclosed structure and the limit of refuse disposal at the WDE Qualitied Facility provides adequate monitoring. The property owner and his/her/itsltheir successor(s) and assign(s) shall grant the Commissioner and his designates access to the property in order to conduct sampling of the soil gas monitoring probe until such time as the Commissioner determines further monitoring is unnecessary. Within 30 days of the Commissioner's determination that the soil gas monitoring probe is no longer required, the property owner at the time the determination is made shall have the soil gas monitoring probe abandoned in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health water well abandonment requirements. including having a licensed \vater well contractor perform the abandonment using grout tremied from the bottom up and cutting the monitoring probe riser below the ground surface. \ I ~For all enclosed structures to be erected within 200 feet to 500 feet of the limit of refuse disposal at the WDE Qualified Facility, excluding propertv north of Coon Creek, the property owner shall, immediately upon / c"ml'klill~ c"llslruclj"ll "rlhc L'llcl",nl ,lruclurL'. ill,l;d! illlhL' h,ISL'111L'1l1 "I' lh<: 1"\\I.'SI k\d ,,1' Ih<: <:lld"SL'd slruclurL'. a millimum ,,1' 011<: ":"1l1illu"us <:xplosi\<: ~as monitor <:4uipPc:d with an alarm set to sound at an <:XpIIISi\<: gas <.:on<.:c:ntration of 20 pc:r<.:c:nt of thc lowcr cxplosive: limit (LEL) for methane:. The: prope:rty owner shall be re:sponsiblc for thc <.:ost of installing and for maintaining said monitor. 4. Th<: extra<.:tion of llroundwater for any purpose other than bv the Commissioner as he deems necessary to carry out his duties and authorities under the Landfill Cleanup Act. Minn. Stat. ~~ I I 55B.39-46rAcn and the Landlill Cleanup Allreement between Anoka County, the WDEPRP Group and its members. and the Commissioner ("Agreement") from the Upper Sand Aquifer within a distance of 500 feet from the limit ofrefuse disposal at the WOE Oualified Fa<.:ilitv is prohibited. This prohibition shall not applv to the repair or replacement of existing wells provided there is no material increase in the quantity of groundwater extracted from the repaired or replaced well as compared to the existing well. and that the water used for drinking water purposes from the repaired/replaced well complies with all applicable drinking water standards. Anv dewatering required for the installation of a public utilitv or for the repair reconstruction, or expansion of public roads or highways within the area <.:o\'ered bv this prohibition shall be subiect to the advance written approval of the Commissioner and, if approved. shall be excluded from this prohibition. "\ 5. The extra<.:tion of groundwater for any purpose without the prior \\Titten approval of the Commissioner other then bv the Commissioner as he deems necessarv to carry out his duties under the Act and the Agreement from the Lower Sand Aquifer within the area designated bv line G on Exhibit A is prohibited. This prohibition shall not apply to the repair or replacement of existing wells provided that there is no material increase in the quantity of groundwater extracted from the repaired or replaced well as compared to the existing well and that the water used for drinking water purposes from the repaired/replaced well complies with all applicable drinking water standards, . j Note: All other sections of the Building Ordinance shall remain as written and adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 16th day of January, 1996. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: L~ d~.-L , Victoria V olk, City Clerk -' , , CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 19Q AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 19 ADOPTED THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 1974, KNOWN AS AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE ADOPTION OF THE MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE BY REFERENCE. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: Ordinance No. 19 is hereby amended as follows: \ Ordinance No. 19, adopted April 9, 1974, Ordinance No. 19A adopted March 16,1976, Ordinance No. 19B adopted May 3,1977, Ordinance No. 19C adopted October 10,1978, Ordinance No. 19D adopted October 21, 1980, Ordinance No. 19E adopted January 6, 1981, Ordinance No. 19F adopted September 6,1983, Ordinance No. 19G adopted March 3,1987, Ordinance No. 19H adopted January 12, 1988, Ordinance No. 191 adopted February 2,1988, Ordinance No. 19J adopted March 15,1988, Ordinance No. 19K adopted November 15, 1988, Ordinance No. 19L adopted August 7, 1990, Ordinance No, 19M adopted December 21, 1993, Ordinance No, 19N adopted April 4, 1995, Ordinance No. 190 adopted September 5,1995 and Ordinance No. 19P adopted January 16, 1996 are hereby repealed. . j Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this _ day of 1997. ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER Victoria V olk, City Clerk J. E. McKelvey, Mayor , J CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACflON March 4, 1997 DATE r AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED /'.0. Non-Discussion FOR AGENDA ITEM ~~ /'.0. Adopt Ordinance No. 205 Planning BY: MN State Building Code Jeff Johnspn, r ~ J i9'~ v REQUEST The City Council is asked to review and adopt Ordinance No. 205 - An Ordinance Adopting the Minnesota State Building Code. Please advise staff in regards to any recommended or proposed changes. \ j ~ ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: '- , , , / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 205 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE: PROVIDING FOR ITS ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT: REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, ENLARGEMENT, ALTERATION, REPAIR, MOVING, REMOVAL, DEMOLITION, CONVERSION, OCCUPANCY, EQUIPMENT, USE, HEIGHT, AREA AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL BUILDINGS AND/OR STRUCTURES IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER: PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES THEREOF; PROVIDING PENAL TIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF: The City Council ofthe City of Andover does ordain as follows: Section 1. Application. Administration and Enforcement. The application, administration, and enforcement of the code shall be in accordance with Minnesota rule part 1300.2100 and as modified by chapter 1305. The code shall be enforced within the extraterritorial limits permitted by Minnesota Statute 16B.62 subdivision 1 when so established by this ordinance. The code enforcement agency of this municipality is called the City of Andover. A Minnesota certified Building Official must be appointed by this jurisdiction to administer the code (Minnesota Statute 16B.65). Three (3) copies of said code shall be marked "OFFICIAL COPY", be kept on file at City Hall, and shall be open for public inspection. Section 2. Permits and Fees. The issuance of permits and the collection of fees shall be as authorized in Minnesota Statutes 16B.62 subdivision 1 and as provided for in chapter 1 of the 1994 Uniform Building Code and Minnesota rules parts 1305,0106 and 1305.0107. Permit fees shall be assessed for work governed by this code in accordance with Resolution #R307-94 and as amended by the City Council. In addition, a surcharge fee shall be collected on all permits issued for work governed by this code in accordance with Minnesota Statute 16B.70. , , I 1 Section 3. Building Code. \ '. / The Minnesota State Building Code, established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 16B.59 to 16B.75 is hereby adopted as the building code for this jurisdiction, The code is hereby incorporated in this ordinance as if fully set out herein. A. The Minnesota State Building Code includes the following chapters of Minnesota Rules: 1. Chapter 1300 - Minnesota Building Code 2. Chapter 1301 - Building Official Certification 3. Chapter 1302 - State Building Construction Approvals 4. Chapter 1305 - Adoption of the 1994 Uniform Building Code including Appendix Chapters: a. 3, Division I, Detention and Correctional Facilities b. 12, Division II, Sound Transmission Control c. 29, Minimum Plumbing Fixtures 5. Chapter 1307 - Elevators and Related Devices 6. Chapter 1315 - Adoption of the 1993 National Electrical Code 7. Chapter 1325 - Solar Energy Systems 8. Chapter 1330 - Fallout Shelters 9. Chapter 1335 - Floodproofing Regulations 10. Chapter 1340 - Facilities for the Handicapped j 11. Chapter 1346 - Adoption ofthe 1991 Uniform Mechanical Code 12. Chapter 1350 - Manufactured Homes 13. Chapter 1360 - Prefabricated Buildings 14. Chapter 1365 - Snow Loads 15. Chapter 1370 - Storm Shelters 16. Chapter 4715 - Minnesota Plumbing Code 17. Chapter 7670 - Minnesota Energy Code B. This municipality may adopt by reference any or all ofthe following optional appendix chapters of the 1994 Uniform Building Code as authorized by Minnesota rule part 1305.0020 subpart 2:15, Reroofing; 33, Excavation and Grading. The following optional appendix chapters of the 1994 Uniform Building Code are hereby adopted and incorporated as part of the building code for this municipality. 1. 15, Reroofing 2, 33, Excavating and Grading C. This municipality may adopt by reference any or all of the following optional , chapters of Minnesota rule: 1306, Special Fire Protection Systems with option 8a I 2 ) (Group M, S, or F occupancies with 5,000 or more gross square feet); 1335, Floodproofing regulations parts 1335.0600 to 1335.1200. '\ The following optional chapters of Minnesota rule are hereby adopted and incorporated as part of the building code for this municipality. 1. 2. 1306 Special Fire Protection System with Option 8A 1335 Floodproofing regulations parts 1335.0600 to 1335.1200 Section 4. Architectural Design (Structure). A. Architectural Design, Exterior Facing The application for a building permit, in addition to other information required by applicable laws or regulations, shall include exterior elevations of the proposed structure and drawings which will adequately and accurately indicate the height, size, design, and appearance of all elevations of the proposed structure and a description of the construction and materials proposed to be used. B. Referral of Application by Inspector in Certain Cases When an application is filed with the City of a building permit for any structure to be built, enlarged, or altered within, or moved into the City, the Building Official shall review such application and accompanying documents to determine whether the exterior architectural design, appearance, or functional plan of such proposed structure, when erected will be so at variance with, or so similar to the exterior architectural design of any structure or structures already constructed or in the course of construction which is within three hundred (300) feet of the lot upon which the structure which is located, or so at variance with the character of the applicable district as established by the zoning ordinance of the City as to cause a substantial depreciation in the property values of the neighborhood. The three hundred (300) feet restriction shall be determined by measurement along the street upon which the structure fronts (19K, 11-15-88). If the Building Official finds that the exterior architectural design of the proposed structure, when erected, may be so at variance with, or so similar to, the exterior architectural design, appearance, or functional plan of structures already constructed or in the course of construction in the neighborhood, no building permit therefore shall be issued and the Building Official shall within ten (10) days after receipt of the application of the building permit application and supporting documents, file the same and such opinion in writing, signed by the Building Official, with the Secretary of the Board of Design Control, which shall review the determination of the Building Official (19J, 3-15-88). \ .' C. Board of Design Control Created 3 , , , The Andover Review Committee of the City of Andover shall be and is hereby appointed as the Board of Design Control. The Board shall review all building permit applications referred to it by the Building Official upon determination that the exterior architectural design ofthe proposed structure would violate the provisions of this ordinance. The Andover Review Committee shall act upon all applications or other matters referred to it within twenty (20) days from the date such application was originally filed with the Building Official. It may approve, conditionally approve or disapprove the exterior design of any proposed building or structure, enlargement or alteration and may modify, request such modifications as it may deem necessary to carry out the purpose and intent of this section. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the Andover Review Committee may take an appeal therefrom to the City Council. Such appeal shall be taken within five (5) days after the decision of the Andover Review Committee. The City Council shall act upon all application or other matters referred to it within forty- five (45) days from the date of appeal (191, 2-02-88). Section 5. Improvements Required. A. / " .' The general contractor or home builder shall meet the improvements required under the ordinance establishing regulations and procedures for the subdivision and platting of land as: L Provide four (4) inches of topsoil and sod on all boulevards in areas served by municipal sewer and water, and four (4) inches of topsoil and seed on all boulevards in other areas, and the conditions regarding hard surfaced driveways and erosion control. B. If any of the improvements required under Section 5A are not completed at the time of the final inspection by the Building Inspector, the general contractor or home builder shall furnish to the City, a security agreement in an amount equal to 150 percent of the Building Official's estimated cost for such improvements. The improvements shall be completed within 30 days of the furnishing of the security agreements with the exception of providing four (4) inches of topsoil and sod on all boulevards in areas served by municipal sewer and/or water and four (4) inches of topsoil and seed on all boulevards in other areas at time of certificate of occupancy, except between October I and May I and all work shall be completed by June. Requests for the release of any security agreements provided hereunder may be made by the general contractor or home builder upon completion of all improvements covered by the security agreement. The Building Official shall state in writing the reasons for such denial. The general contractor or home builder may appeal the decision to the City Council by filing with the Building Official a written request for such appeal within ten (10) days after receiving the 4 , , I C. D. E. F. '\ , / Buildings Official's notice. The appeal shall be placed on the agenda ofthe next regular City Council meeting. The general contractor or home builder shall be notified of the time and place of such meeting. The Council may affirm or reject the decision of the Building Official. The security referred to in this ordinance may be in the form of cash, money order, cashier's check or irrevocable letter of credit. Items to be escrowed for but not limited to, driveways, steps, brickwork, stucco, siding, garage floor, grading, deck footing, retaining wall, sidewalks and drainfields. If the improvements for which a security agreement has been given are not completed within a thirty (30) day period, the builder shall forfeit the security agreement and the City shall proceed to complete the improvements and collect the costs thereof from the security. If proof of other security is provided by the general contractor or home builder the above security will not be required. For the purposes of this ordinance, the term "boulevard' shall mean the area of a public right-of-way extending from the back of the curb, or the edge of a roadway where no curb is installed, to the right-of-way limit (19H, 1-12-88). Section 6. WDE Site A. No enclosed structure shall be built within 200 feet of the limit of refuse disposal at the WDE Qualified Facility as depicted as Line F in the Attached Exhibit A (Exhibit A is a drawing of the WDE Qualified Facility), except for any property north of Coon Creek. B. For any enclosed structure to be erected within 200 feet to 500 feet of the limit of refuse disposal at the WDE Qualified Facility as depicted in Exhibit A, excluding property north of Coon Creek, (the line 500 feet distant from the limit ofrefuse disposal is depicted as Line F) the property owner shall, prior to construction of the structure, install a soil gas monitoring probe located between the structure and the limit of refuse disposal at the WDE Qualified Facility. The soil gas monitoring probe shall be of a design approved by the Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ("Commissioner") and shall be installed in a location approved by the Commissioner. The soil gas monitoring probe shall be installed by a water well contractor licensed in the State of Minnesota. Installation of a soil gas monitoring probe pursuant to this paragraph shall not be required if the Commissioner in their sole discretion, determines that an existing soil gas monitoring probe located in between the proposed enclosed structure and the limit of refuse disposal at the WDE Qualified Facility provided adequate monitoring. The property owner and their successor(s) and assign(s) shall grant the Commissioner and their designates access to the property in order to 5 , I C. \ \ ) conduct sampling ofthe soil gas monitoring probe until such time as the Commissioner determines further monitoring is unnecessary. Within 30 days of the Commissioner's determination that the soil gas monitoring probe is not longer required, the property owner at the time determination is made shall have the soil gas monitoring probe abandoned in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health water well abandonment requirements, including having a licensed water well contractor perform the abandonment using grout tremied from the bottom up and cutting the monitoring probe riser below the ground surface. For all enclosed structures to be erected within 200 feet to 500 feet of the limit of refuse disposal at the WDE Qualified Facility, excluding property north of Coon Creek, the property owner shall immediately upon completing construction of the enclosed structure, install in the basement or the lowest level of the enclosed structure, a minimum of one continuous explosive gas monitor equipped with an alarm set to sound at an explosive gas concentration of20 percent of the lower explosive limit (LEL) for methane. The property owner shall be responsible for the cost of installing and for maintaining said monitor. D. The extraction of groundwater for any purpose other than by the Commissioner as he or she deems necessary to carry out their duties and authorities under the Landfill Cleanup Act. Minn. Stat. SS 1155B.39-46, ("Act") and the Landfill Cleanup Agreement between Anoka County, the WDEPRP Group and its members, and the Commissioner ("Agreement"), from the Upper Sand Aquifer within a distance of 500 feet from the limit of refuse disposal at the WDE Qualified Facility is prohibited. This prohibition shall not apply to the repair or replacement of existing wells provided there is no material increase in the quantity of groundwater extracted from the repaired or replaced well as compared to the existing well, and that the water used for drinking water purposes from the repaired/replaced well complies with all applicable drinking water standards. Any dewatering required for the installation of a public utility or for the repair, reconstruction, or expansion of public roads or highways within the area covered by this prohibition shall be subject to the advance written approval of the Commissioner and, if approved, shall be excluded from this prohibition. E. The extraction of groundwater for any purpose without the prior written approval of the Commissioner, other then by the Commissioner as he or she deems necessary to carry out their duties under the Act and the Agreement from the Lower Sand Aquifer within the area designated by line G on Exhibit A is prohibited. This prohibition shall not apply to the repair or replacement of existing wells provided that there is no material increase in the quantity of groundwater extracted from the repaired and replaced well as compared to the existing well and that the water used for drinking water purpose from the repaired/replaced well complies with all applicable drinking water standards, 6 , J , 1 ~ , / Section 7. Violations and Penalties. Any person who violates any provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to applicable fines and imprisonment defined by State law. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this _ day of 1997. CITY OF ANDOVER lE. McKelvey, Mayor ATTEST: Victoria V olk, City Clerk 7 Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 14, 1997 Page 4 , ) ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE 204, DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS Mr. Johnson explained Ordinance 7 would be repealed and Ordinance 204. The revision includes language from ordinance about the lowest floor elevations. replaced with the Platting Commissioner Peek asked if there was a definition of "hard surfaced driveway". Mr. Johnson stated he would check the ordinance. Commissioner Barry asked the reason for the three-foot separation between the high water mark and the lowest level of the house. FHA requires only a one-foot separation. Mr. Johnson felt the City falls in line with what other cities are requiring. Commissioner Apel disputed that, thinking Andover has one of the highest separation requirements. No change was recommended. Commissioner Wells suggested the garage apron be required to avoid a drop from developing between the driveway and the garage. Mr. Johnson stated hopefully the grading, drainage and erosion control plans are reviewed so there are no problems. Commissioner Peek felt that is a part of the building, not the driveway. No change was recommended. I Commissioner Wells asked acout the suggestion to require grates over the ends of culverts. Mr. Johnson stated the City Engineer would issue permits for culverts. After some discussion, Chairperson Squires stated Section 5 provides the Building Official the discretion to determine when a grate is necesRary. He felt that determination should be left with Staff and not dictated in the ordinance. Other Commissioners agreed. No changes were recommended to the proposed ordinance. "' ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 205, MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE @ Mr. Johnson explained Ordinances 15 and 19 would be repealed and replaced with Ordinance 205. The Building Official has reviewed the proposed Ordinance 205. Commissioner Peek asked about the date of the Minnesota State Building Code by which it must be referenced. Mr. Johnson stated he will check that out and confer with the City Attorney. No corrections were made by the Commission. OTHER BUSINESS Snowmobiles - Commissioner Wells complained about the lack of respect by snowmobilers on her property and other private properties. Mr. Johnson explained the Andover Sno-Dragons Snowmobile Club is working with the Ci ty and Sheriff's Department, and they are also trying to provide trails out of the City. He suggested she contact the Snowmobile Club if there are further problems. \ J CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION March 4, 1997 DATE '. AGENDA Non~~JI~n ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED f\O FOR AGENDA ITEM Adopt Ordinance No. 17E Planning V f\O (To Repeal Ordinance No. 17) "ff'm w BY: d7. REQUEST The City Council is asked to review and adopt Ordinance No. 17E. As proposed, this ordimince (Driveway Construction Standards) would be deleted. For further information, please refer to the November 26,1996 Planning and Zoning Commission minutes. " ) , \ ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 26, 1996 Page 9 ) ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 15, MN STATE BUILDING CODE - REPEALED Mr. Johnson stated the Building Official has recommended this ordinance can be repealed, as that portion of the code has been incorporated with Ordinance 19. The Commission agreed. @ ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 17, DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS Mr. Johnson stated the Building Official and City Engineer have reviewed the ordinance. The Building Official had no comment other than the ordinance is necessary; however, the City Engineer made the following recommendations: reference to basement floor elevations should be revised to the current standards per Ordinance 10. Section 4, Surfacing: be revised to include urban and rural surfacing. Section 5, Culverts: all culverts shall be corrugated metal or equivalent. Culverts within the right of way shall meet all provisions and permit requirement from the Anoka County Highway Department. Also, the City Engineer would reserves the right to determine the size of the culvert. / Commissioner Wells suggested that large culverts be required to be screened to prevent debris from going through and to prevent children from crawling through them. Mr. Almgren stated that any culvert in the county right of way must be approved by the County Highway Department. This ordinance deals strictly with residential driveways. Something could be added that if the culvert is over a certain size that trash guards would be required. The Commission had no further comment. " ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 18, STREET NAME CHANGE Mr. Johnson stated the City is required to make street name changes via an ordinance. The intent is to consolidate this with other street name ordinances. No change is being recommended. The Commission agreed. ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 19, MN STATE BUILDING CODE Mr. Johnson stated the intent is to consolidate Ordinance 19. The Commission agreed. OTHER BUSINESS Permanent employee Mr. Carlberg announced the City Council has authorized the permanent full-time position for a planner, so Mr. Hinzman will go to permanent full-time status as of January 1. One of his main duties will be update the Comprehensive Plan. A survey of the residents is being planned. , , , December 24 meeting: Mr. Carlberg announced that the December 24, 1996, Planning Commission meeting is being cancelled due to the holidays. CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA , ) ORDINANCE NO. 17 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING MINIMUM ELEVATIONS AND STANDARDS FOR BUILDING AND DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION. The City Council of the City of Andover, Minnesota does hereby ordain: SECTION 1. SCOPE AND PURPOSE All buildings and driveways constructed in City of Andover subsequent to the effective date of this Ordinance shall meet or exceed the minimum standards established by this Ordinance. The purpose of the minimum standards imposed by this Ordinance is to insure that proper drainage is maintained and to prevent public liabilities being caused inadvertently. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this Ordinance, the meaning of certain words and terms shall be defined in the Minnesota State Building Code as adopted by City of Andover Ordinance 19 at amended. (17A, 11-6-79) SECTION 3. ELEVATIONS AND SLOPE / The minimum grade at the front of any building constructed on any lot within the City of Andover will not be less than one and one-half (1 1/2') feet above the elevation of the street directly in front of the building. If construction plans are submitted substantiate that proper drainage can be elevations, the City Building Inspector vary the terms of this section. in sufficient detail to maintained at lesser may, in his discretion, Any party aggrieved by a decision of the Building Inspector shall have the right to appeal said decision pursuant to provision 5.04 to City of Andover Ordinance No.3. No fees shall be required for such an appeal. The elevation of all garage floors shall be above grade at the vehicular access door. All driveways shall slope downward from the garage for a distance of fifty (50') feet. All driveways shall slope upward for a distance of fifty (50') feet from the shoulder or curb of the street. , , J The slope of all driveways sha~l not be less than one 1% (one percent) nor more than 8% (elght percent) overall rise. The garage floor shall be a minimum of 18" (eighteen inches) above the finished centerline street elevation. The driveway slope for the first 8' (eight feet) from the curb to the house shall not exceed a 2% (two percent) rise. (17B, 6-16-87) (17D, 3-21-95) Basement floor elevation shall be at least three (3') feet above the highest known and/or recorded water table in area of construction. (17A, 11-6-79) SECTION 4. SURFACING All driveways and sufficient amount of surfaces will remain conditions. access erosion intact drives shall be surfaced with a resistance material so that driveway during normal usage and weather An access drive or driveway shall be provided to every principal building and shall be constructed according to the minimum standards of the city. When said building is one hundred fifty (150') feet or more from a thoroughfare or street, an access drive shall be constructed with a clear cut width of sixteen (16') feet and shall have a built up base twelve (12') feet wide consisting of four inch (4") Class 5 gravel (or equal). Said drive shall also have variable ditches for its entire length. (17C, 2-15-94) SECTION 5. CULVERTS Where driveways are constructed across ditches or swales, culverts shall be installed The culverts shall be of such size deemed Building Official to carry the expected flow and shall not be less than twelve (12") inches drainage or road under the driveway. necessary by the rate of storm water in diameter. SECTION 6. SEPARABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance for any reason is held invalid or unconstitutional, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. SECTION 7. PENALTY Any person violating any guilty of a misdemeanor punished according to state provision of this Ordinance shall be and upon conviction thereof, shall be law. SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force upon its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the Andover City Council this 11th day of September, 1973. CITY OF ANDOVER " JERRY WINDSCHITL Mayor ATTEST: ) PAT DAHL Clerk Amended: 17A, 11-06-79 , , ) '\ ; , '" 17B, 6-16-87 17C, 2-15-94 1 7D, 3-21-95 .' , , ) \ ;' '\ / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTYOFANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 17E AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 17 ADOPTED THE 11 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1973 KNOWN AS AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING MINIMUM ELEVATIONS AND STANDARDS FOR BUILDING AND DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: Ordinance No. 17 is hereby amended as follows: Ordinance No. 17 adopted September 11, 1973, Ordinance No. 17 A adopted November 6, 1979, Ordinance No. 17B adopted June 6, 1987, Ordinance No. 17C adopted February 15, 1994 and Ordinance No. 17D adopted March 21, 1995 are hereby repealed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this _ day of 1997. ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER Victoria V olk, City Clerk J. E. McKelvey, Mayor CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION March 4, 1997 DATE AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED /10. Non-Discussion FOR AGENDA ITEM ~::~~~~ /10. Adopt Ordinance No. 204 BY: Driveway Construction Standards ;;2. 1. REQUEST The City Council is asked to review and adopt Ordinance No. 204 - An Ordinance Establishing Minimum Elevations and Standards for Building and Driveway Construction. Please advise staff in regards to any recommended or proposed changes. , ) \ ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 204 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING MINIMUM ELEVATIONS AND STANDARDS FOR BUILDING AND DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION. The City Council of the City of Andover, Minnesota does hereby ordain: Section 1. Scope and Purpose. All buildings and driveways constructed in City of Andover shall meet or exceed the minimum standards established by this ordinance. The purpose of the minimum standards imposed by this ordinance are to insure that proper drainage is maintained and to prevent public liabilities being caused inadvertently. Section 2. Definitions. I For the purpose of this ordinance, the meaning of certain words and terms shall be defined in the Minnesota State Building Code as adopted by City. Section 3. Elevations and Slope. The minimum grade at the front of any building constructed on any lot within the City of Andover will not be less than one and one-half (1 'h) feet above the elevation of the street directly in front of the building, If construction plans are submitted in sufficient detail to substantiate that proper drainage can be maintained at lesser elevations, the City Building Inspector may, in his or her discretion, vary the terms of this Section. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the Building Inspector shall have the right to appeal said decision to the City Council. The elevation of all garage floors shall be above grade at the vehicular access door. All driveways shall slope downward from the garage for a distance of fifty (50) feet. All driveways shall slope upward for a distance of fifty (50) feet from the shoulder or curb of the street. i The slope of all driveways shall not be less than one (1) percent nor more than eight (8) percent overall rise. The garage floor shall be a minimum of eighteen (18) inches above , " ., the finished centerline street elevation. The driveway slope for the first eight (8) feet from the curb to the house shall not exceed two (2) percent rise (17D, 3-21-95). / Basement or low floor elevation shall be a minimum of three (3) feet above the seasonal high water mark or one foot above the designated or designed one hundred (100) year flood elevation, whichever is higher unless evidence is submitted and certified by a geotechnical engineer hired by the City at the expense of the developer and approval by the City Council that a separation ofless than three (3) feet can be achieved and is warranted. Section 4. Surfacing. All subdivisions with municipal sanitary sewer and/or water shall have hard surfaced (concrete or bituminous) driveways. All subdivisions without municipal sanitary sewer and/or water shall have driveways that are hard surfaced from the street to the property line. All access driveways shall be surfaced with a sufficient amount of erosion resistance material so that driveway surfaces will remain intact during normal usage and weather conditions. '. An access drive or driveway shall be provided to every principal building and shall be constructed according to the minimum standards of the City. When said building is one hundred fifty (150) feet or more from a thoroughfare or street, an access drive shall be constructed with a clear cut width of sixteen (16) feet and shall have a built up base twelve (12) feet wide consisting offour (4) inches of Class 5 gravel (or equal). Said drive shall also have variable ditches for its entire length (17C, 2-15-94). j Section 5. Culverts. Driveways that are constructed across drainage or road ditches or swales, culverts shall be installed under the driveway. The culverts shall be of such size deemed necessary by the Building Official to carry the expected flow rate of storm water, shall not be less than twelve (12) inches in diameter, and shall be corrugated metal or equal. Culverts located within the right-of-way of the Anoka County Highway Department shall meet all of their permit requirements, Section 6. Separability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance for any reason is held invalid or unconstitutional, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. , ) \ / , , , j Section 7. Penalty. Any person who violates any provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to applicable fines and imprisonment defined by State law. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force upon its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the Andover City Council this _ day of ,1997, ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER Victoria V olk, City Clerk J, E. McKelvey, Mayor Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 14, 1997 Page 4 @ ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE 204, DRIVE'.iAY CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS Mr. Johnson exolained Ordinance 7 would be reoealed and Ordinance 204: The revision includes lang-uage from ordinance about the lowest floor elevations. replaced with the Platting Commissioner Peek asked if there was a definition of "hard surfaced driveway". Mr. Johnson stated he would check the ordinance. Commissioner Barry asked the reason for the three-foot separation between the high \'later mark and the lowest level of the house. FHA requires only a one-foot separation. Mr. Johnson felt the City falls in line with what other cities are requiring. Commissioner Apel disputed that, thinking .~dover has one of the highest separation requirements. No change was !:ecommended. Commissioner Wells suggested the garage apron be re~uired to avoid a drop frcm developing between the driveway and the garage. Mr. Johnson stated hopefully the grading, drainage and erosion control plans are reviewed so there are no problems. Commissioner Peek felt that is a part of the building, not the driveway. No change was recommended. Commissioner \",el15 asked atout the suggestion to require grates over the ends of cui verts. Mr" Johnson seated the City Engineer would issue \ permits for culverts. After some discussion, Chairperson Squires stated ; Section 5 provides the Building Official the discretion to determine when a grate is necesBary. He felt that determination should be left with Staff and not dictated in the ordinance. Other Commissioners agreed. No changes were recommended to the proposed ordinance. ORDINANCE REVIEJT.i - ORDINANCZ NO. 205, MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE Mr. Johnson explained Ordinances replaced with Ordinance 205. The proposed Ordinance 205. 15 and 19 would be Building Official has repealed reviewed and the Commissioner Peek asked about the date of the Minnesota State Building Code by which it must be referenced. Mr. Johnson stated he will check that out and confer with the City Attorney. No corrections were made by the Commission. OTHER BUSINESS Snowmcbiles - Commissioner Wells complained about the lack of respect by snowmobilers on her property and other private properties. Mr. Johnson explained the Andover Sno-Dragons Snowmobile Club is working with the Ci ty and Sheriff / s Department / and they are also trying to provide trails out of the City. He suggested she contact the Snowmobile Club if there are further problems. , 1 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION , -' DATE: March 4. 1997 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO.o" '1 . Resolution US Postal Service Planning David L. Carlberg ~ Community Development Director -tC..-- Non-discussion The City Council is asked to approve the attached resolution requesting the United States Postal Service construct and operate the "retail" portion ofthe postal operation to be located on the northeast comer of Hanson Boulevard NW and Crosstown Boulevard NW (Hamilton property). The Council may be aware that the post office is proposing to construct a distribution center on said property with the future operation of a retail facility. The retail facility is for over the counter type postal services to the residents of the City. Staff has been informed that if the City has an interest in seeing the retail portion of the facility being operated with the opening ofthe office than we need to make this known. The Council's approval of the attached resolution will serve as notification of the City's interest. "- / , , , l '\ ) CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -97 A RESOLUTION STATING THE CITY OF ANDOVER'S SUPPORT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE "RETAIL" PORTION OF THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE FACILITY TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER. WHEREAS, the City of Andover has been informed that the United States Postal Service is proposing to construct a postal facility on the northeast comer of Hanson Boulevard NW and Crosstown Boulevard NW; and WHEREAS, The City of Andover understands that the "retail" portion of the facility may not be constructed and operated at the time of the initial opening of the postal facility; and '\ / WHEREAS, the City of Andover requests and supports the construction and operation of the retail portion of the facility to provide a service to the residents of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council ofthe City of Andover hereby declares the City's interest in the construction and operation of the "retail" portion of the postal facility. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this _ 4th_ day of March, 1997. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST ],E. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk , " ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION DATE 1\1" ~rroh a 1007 - I~A SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Non -Discussion Item. Fire Department ITEM b.uJ. f\O . BY: Authorization to Solicit Bids Dan Winkel, for Fire Department Rescue Vehicle Fire Chief 3" . I , I j I , i , i The Fire Department is requesting City Council authorization to solicit quotations for a , , . . , , , ) ; , , new rescue truck. The rescue truck 1S located at StatiOn No. I and was ongmally scheduled to be replaced in 1995. Please note that the grass vehicle at Station No. I is budgeted for replacement in 1997. At the January Officers' meeting, a discussion was made to replace the rescue truck this year rather than the grass truck. The current rescue truck is a 1984 Ford Van that responds to approximately 150 incidents a year. The proposed vehicle will be a four-wheel drive pic1..Llp truck chassis with an aluminum or fiberglass rear body. MOTtON BY: SECOND BY: --- J .,.,. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION I \ \ \ \ \ DATE: March 4. 1991 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Administration Richard Fursman/Pat Janssen ITEM NO. I &. Award Bid/Proj. #94-30AIFurniture Contract, Cont. Request: The Andover City Council is requested to consider for approval the furniture contract for the new city hall addition. History: On December 19,1996 the City Council requested City Staff to obtain bids for furnishing the city hall addition. Prior to that directive, a budget of $11 0,000 was set during the 1996 budget planning session in anticipation of the new addition. Once a floor plan of the addition was approved and the project budget established, a staff committee was formed to research needs and evaluate product lines. Committee members took several tours, met with numerous factory representatives, and weighed various options. Bid specifications were finally drawn for typical works stations and offices, enabling the City to go for competitive bids. Andover requested bids on four typical offices matching the space of the addition. The following are the results of those bidders who met bid requirements: Company Manufacturer COfporateExpress HonCompany~Terrace System Design Wise, Inc. T eknion Richard Nash & Assoc.ALLSTEEL Facility Systems ' Ethospace Interiors Bid $105,244 $109,470 $162,349 $143,774 Design Wise and Corporate Express were requested to do a cost refinement as the two companies were nearly identical in cost. Subsequent design refinement indicated little cost differential between the two companies with Design Wise slightly lower. The staff committee convened to discuss the pros and cons of each system and recommended that Council reject previous bids (February 18 Council meeting) and rebid with tighter specifications. The bids which met bid specifications are as follows: Company Design Wise, Inc. Wagers Manufacturer Teknion Rosemount Office Systems, Inc- Velocity System 1llil $ 83,709 $105,012 The Council is requested to award Design Wise, Inc. as provided in the attached resolution. CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 94-30A FOR FURNITURE IN THE AREA OF CITY HALL . WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bid let for Monday, March 3,1997, as authorized by the City Council, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law with results as follows: Company Design Wise, Inc. Wagers Manufacturer Teknion Rosemount Office Systems, Inc.-Velocity System Total Bid $ 83,709 $105,012 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate DesilV1Wise Inc. as being the lowest responsible bidder. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into a contract with DesilV1 Wise Inc in an amount not to exceed $ 90.000 for purchase, design and instaIlation of Modular Panel Systems Furniture for the new City Hall addition. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a re~lar meeting this .Alh..day of March , 1921, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilinembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria V olk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER \' ~. ::", REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION March 4, 1997 DATE AGENDA Add_~CTlON ~ ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM ~ Adopt Resolution Amending Resolution No. 294-96 Victoria V olk City Clerk d. 6 . REOUEST The City COWlcil is asked to review and adopt the attached resolution (A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 294-96 - A Resolution Setting Fees for Permits, Rezoning, Special Use Permits, Variances, Platting, License Fees, Lot Splits, Rental Fees and Various Other Fees. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 294-96 (A RESOLUTION SETTING FEES FOR PERMITS, REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMITS, VARIANCES, PLATTING, LICENSE FEES, LOT SPLITS, RENTAL FEES AND VARIOUS OTHER FEES. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby resolves: The following service charges are hereby established for the year 1997. TYPE OF FEE FEE ORDINANCE Rezoning Recording Fee for Rezoning Abstract Property Torrens Property $25,00 $34.50 $40.00 8 Special Use Permit Recording Fee for Special Use Permit Abstract Property Torrens Property $25.00 $34,50 $40.00 8 Lot Split Recording Fee for Lot Split Abstract Property Torrens Property $25.00 $34,50 $40.00 40 Kennel License Commercial Kennel License Recording Fee: Abstract Property Torrens Property Private Kennel License Annual Renewal (Kennel License) Private Kennel $150.00 53 $25.00 $34.50 $40,00 $100,00 $25.00 $25,00 Page Two (Resolution) Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 4th day of March, 1997. ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER Victoria V olk, City Clerk J. E. McKelvey, Mayor . . ord 5""3 CIlY OF ANDOVER COUNlY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. 130-96 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEES FOR PRIVATE DOG KENNEL LICENSES. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: The following fees are established for 1996: Private dog kennels $100.00 Renewal for private dog kennels $ 25.00 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 2nd day of .h!h:.., 1996. CIlY OF ANDOVER Attest: ..l ;a-~ .E. McKelvey - Mayor dL IlLL/ Victoria Yolk - City Clerk J .' CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF CLEANUP OF CONTAMINATED LAND IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER. The City Council of Andover supports the cleanup and development of contaminated areas. WHEREAS, the City Council seeks assistance for the elimination of Hazardous Wastes in Andover; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Andover supports H.F.692 and S.F.567 requesting funds for the elimination of Hazardous Waste Contamination and Blight in Andover. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at regular meeting this .4lh day of March 1997, with Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria V olk - City Clerk ~R-03-97 14:08 From:HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 6122963949 T-120 P.02/02 Job-293 "'\ H.F. 692: Cleanup of Contaminated Land in the City of Andover v,{.f Economic Dev. & International Tra~e. mm., March 5, 1997 0~ a-iJ... -0(f tJ{5 ~=:'::on ..... _,000 in '_ri.tion _..... $10 4>1::~ Ind~~..d development project (mostly pooled tax increment funds). The cleanup funding is needed in order to complete an economic development project which will increase the City of Andover's tax capacity by over 40% and add over 100 jobs to the community. Background . Andover (population 23,000) is a third-ring metro suburb, located east of the City of Anoka. It is II. "bedroom community" with little industry. The current tax capacity is $12 million for existing busi- nesses. The project referred to in this legislation is a series of old salvage yards, located on the "main drag" of Bunkl'r T .11 kl' Blvd; it is located next to residential neighborhoods. The City of Andover has been purchasing the salvage yards in an effort to develop the ~acre site. Much of the site was listed as a Federal Super Fund site with large amounts of hazardous waste buried beneath the surface. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EP A) spent about $1 million to clean-up the site. (See Problem below for more details.) Problem In 1994 the EP A wrote a letter stating their clean-up of the site was over. In 1995 the Livable Communities Act (LCA) was enacted. (Note that this was AFTER the EPA had signed off on the cleanup project.) The Andover City Council voted to not participate in this "voluntary" Metropolitan Council program. In 1996 the City of Andover began purchasing sites and discovered the area had not been "cleaned" as the EP A has indicated. A large amount of contaminated and hazardous waste was unearthed by the City. The EP A and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) have indicate that the mess is now the City's responsibility because the City purchased the property. The fRet that such a large amount of contamination was missed by both agencies is of no fiscal concl'T1I to them. . Andover has continued to cleanup after the federal and state agencies, with no assistance. Recently, Andover applied lor two related State grants offered through the Department of Trade and Economic Development (DTED) and the Metropolitan Council. In both instances the City was turned down because Andover elected not to participate in the "voluntary" LCA. (pursuant to MN Statute 116J.554, subdivision 1a; of the local housing incentive program under section 473.254.) Current Status Andover is left "holding the bag," so to speak. with hazardous waste cleanup that the EP A should have done; the site includes PCBs, lead, petroleum products and arsenic. The City-at its own cost-is using due diligence to protect the site and avoid potential groundwater contamination. Andover has saved the EP A and MPCA millions of dollars. However, because the waste is more toxic than the City originally thought. and waste will have to be transported out of state to federal landfills, the additional expenses have been too much for the City. With this H,F. 692 legislation the $500,O()() will enable the City to finish the clean-up, so that the site can be developed. Once completed this economic development site will add $5 million to the City's tax capadty. \ \ To The Honorable Council of the CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA Date: .JjiiS h7 No. Council Members: We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the City of Andover, Minnesota, do hereby petition/request your honorable body to consider the following: I. That the subject site retain its single-family zoning (R-4) II. In the event that the proposed site is rezoned, we do hereby petition/request your honorable body to consider the following lIsted conditions as part of the final approval for the proposed Presbyterian Homes Senior Housing project (the Adolfson property): A) TIlat a substantial earthen benn, topped wilh substantial spruce/pine trees ten feet or greater in height, shrubs and other landscaping be constructed along the northerly edge of subject site in the area lying between Orchid Street NW and Quay Street. B) That some of the healthier trees between 13782 Orchid Street and the earthen berm be left and the unhealthy ones be removed, for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the homeowner. C) That the northerly and easterly edge of the proposed visitor parking area be shielded from the residence to the north of the subJect project by utilizing tall landscaping and/or shnibbel)'. That the project use four-inch or larger diameter deCiduous trees for landscaping. D) That the driveway for the proposed twin homes and for the proposed visitor parking area be directed to Marigold Street NW and that the other senior housing residents utilize Quay Street, for the purpose of gaining green space between the project and the homeowners. E) That the exterior coloration/siding material of the proposed complex shall be neutral or earth tones. F) That the senior housing complex be fully taxable by the city. We trust your honorable body will granl the same. Respectfully submitted, Property Owner Property Address /( /1 ~:v /:--- 'Y '. To The Honorable Council of the CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA Council Members: Date: ;2 .-;)5 -1 7 No. We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the City of Andover, Minnesota, do hereby petition/request your honorable body to consider the following: I. That the subject site retain its single-family zoning (R-4) II. In the event that the pro{losed site is rezoned, we do hereby petition/request your honorable body to consider the following listed conditions as part of the fmal approval for the proposed Presbyterian Homes Senior Housing project (the Adolfson property): A) That a substantial earthen berm, topped with substantial spruce/pine trees ten feet or greater in height, shrubs and other landscaping be constructed along the northerly edge of subject site in the area lying between Orchid Street NW and Quay Street. B) That some of the healthier trees between 13782 Orchid Street and the earthen berm be left and the unhealthy ones be removed, for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the homeowner. C) That the northerly and easterly edge of the proposed visitor parking area be shielded from the residence to the north of the subJect project by utilizing tall landscaping and/or shrubbel)'. That the project use four-inch or larger diameter deCIduous trees for landscaping. D) That the driveway for the proposed twin homes and for the proposed visitor parking area be directed to Marigold Street NW and that the other senior housing residents utilize Quay Street, for the purpose of gaining green space between the project and the homeowners. E) That the exterior coloration/siding material of the proposed complex shall be neutral or earth tones. F) That the senior housing complex be fully taxable by the city. We trust your honorable body will grant the same. Respectfully submitted, Property Owner Property Address To The Honorable Council of the CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA Date: ) -;;I5-q7 No. Council Members: We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the City of Andover, Minnesota, do hereby petition/request your honorable body to consider the following: I. That the subject site retain its single-family zoning (R-4) II. In the event that the proposed site is rezoned, we do hereby petition/request your honorable body to consider the following hsted conditions as part of the final approval for the proposed Presbyterian Homes Senior Housing project (the Adolfson property): A) That a substantial earthen berm, topped with substantial spruce/pine trees ten feet or greater in height, shrubs and other landscaping be constructed along the northerly edge of subject site in the area lying between Orchid Street NW and Quay Street B) That some of the healthier trees between 13782 Orchid Street and the earthen berm be left and the unhealthy ones be removed, for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the homeowner. C) That the northerly and easterly edge of the proposed visitor parking area be shielded from the residence to the north of the subJect project by utilizing tall landscaping and/or shrubbery. That the project use four-inch or larger diameter deciduous trees for landscaping. D) That the driveway for the proposed twin homes and for the proposed visitor parking area be directed to Marigold Street NW and that the other senior housing residents utilize Quay Street, for the purpose of gaining green space between the project and the homeowners. E) That the exterior coloration/siding material of the proposed complex shall be neutral or earth tones. F) That the senior housing complex be fully taxable by the city. We trust your honorable body will grant the same. Respectfully submitted, Property Owner Property Address Date: ':;-k3h7 No. To The Honorable Council of the CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA Council Members: We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the City of Andover, Minnesota, do hereby petition/request your honorable body to consider the following: I. That the subject site retain its single-family zoning (R-4) II: In the event that the prol'osed site is rezoned, we do hereby petition/request your honorable body to consider the following listed conditions as part of the fInal approval for the proposed Presbyterian Homes Senior Housing project (the Adolfson property): A) That a substantial earthen berm, topped with substantial spruce/pine trees ten feet or greater in height, shrubs and other landscaping be constructed along the northerly edge of subject site in the area lying between Orchid Street NW and Quay Street. B) That some of the healthier trees between 13782 Orchid Street and the earthen berm be left and the unhealthy ones be removed, for the purpose of protecting the privacy of the homeowner. C) That the northerly and easterly edge of the proposed visitor parking area be shielded from the residence to the north of the subJect project by utilizing tall landscaping and/or shnibbeI)', That the project use four-inch or larger diameter decIduous trees for landscaping. D) That the driveway for the proposed twin homes and for the proposed visitor parking area be directed to Marigold Street NW and that the other senior housing residents utilize Quay Street, for the purpose of gaining green space between the project and the homeowners. E) That the exterior coloration/siding material of the proposed complex shall be neutral or earth tones. F) That the senior housing complex be fully taxable by the city. We trust your honorable body will grant the same. Respectfully submitted, Property Owner Property Address DATE March 4.. 1997 ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - February 11, 1997 HRA Meeting Minutes - February 18 1997 City Council Minutes - February 18, 1997 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes - February 20. 1997 Seasonal Road Restriction Notice Preliminary Plat/Chesterton Commons Revised Grading Plan/Woodland Estates Schedule of Bills PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS THE NEXT AGENDA. CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 NOTICE CITY OF ANDOVER SEASONAL ROAD RESTRICTIONS ON CITY STREETS (LOAD LIMITS) Effective Monday March 10 , 1997, residential streets are restricted to 5-ton axle weight limit with some residential streets posted for 4-ton axle weight ~ limit. City collector streets are usually posted at 7-ton. f/ri#% Lh~ Scott B. Erickson City Engineer SBE:rja cc: Anoka Union Mayor and Council Anoka County Sheriffs Office Andover Deputies City Hall