The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC February 18, 1997 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 Regular City Council Meeting - February 18, 1997 agenda Call to Order - 7:00 PM Resident Forum Bookmark Agenda Approval ~ Consent Agenda Approval of Minutes minutes Discussion Items 1. Public Hearing/95-14/Crooked Lake Boulevard ph9514 2, BiII's Superette Traffic Study Discussion bills 3. Non-Conforming Home Occupations, Cont. nonconform 4, Award Bid/Proj. #94-30A/Furniture Contract, Cont. furniture 5, 1997 Union Contract union 6. Approve Change Order #l!94-30/City HaIl Addition co19430 7. Approve Change Order #2/94-30/City HaIl Addition co29430 8, Schedule Joint Council Meeting with City of Ramsey/April 29 ramsey 9. Rezoning/R-l, Single Family Rural to General Recreation/Jeff Leadens rezone 10, Special Use Permit/Golf Driving Range & Putting Course/2989 - 166th Lane NW/JeffLeadens golf 11. Adopt Ord. #56C, Intoxicating Liquor, Cont. liquor Reports of Staff. Committees. Commissions 12. Update of Public Meeting/95-24/Schedule Special Meeting' proj9524 13. Appoint Comprehensive Task Force Committee Members taskforce / 14. Approve Authorization for Advertisement/Engineering Technicians engtechs 15. Anoka County Highway Dept. Traffic Study Results traffic HRA Meeting 16, Appoint Officers officers Non-Discussion/Consent Items 17. Reduce Letter of Credit/HiIls of Bunker Lake 5th Addition hills5 18. Reduce Letter of Credit/Echo Woods echo ' 19. Appoint Park & Recreation Commission Member pkrec 20. Adopt Ord. # 4A(Repeal Ord. #4) ord4a 21. Adopt Ord. # 200IMoving of Buildings/Public Right-of-Way ord200 22. Amend Ord. # 8/Sect. 4.11 (Relocated Structures)& Sect. 7.03(Special Uses) ord8 23, Adopt Ord, # 6C(Repeal Ord, #6) ord6c 24. Adopt Ord. # 201IManufactured Home Parks ord201 25, Adopt Ord. # 7A(Repeal Ord, #7) ord 7a 26. Adopt Ord. # lIE (Repeal Ord. #11) ordlle 27. Adopt Ord, # 202 (Planning & Zoning Commission) ord202 28. Adopt. Ord. # 13C (Repeal Ord. #13) ord 13c 29, Adopt Ord. # 203/Sewer Service Connection Charges ord 203 30. Update of Coon Creek Watershed District Representative Position ccwd 31. Special Use Permit/Accessory Structure/16473 VaIley DriveIMichael & Sue Bleeker sup 32. Approve Storm Sewer Maintenance Quotes/97-16 quote 33, Approve Change Order #l!WeIl #3 Maintenance/96-28/Include Maintenance of We II #4 co9628 34. Approve AuthorizationlPhase II Wetland Replacement Plan w/Professional appr972 Engineering Consultants/97-2 Mayor-Council Input Payment of Claims Adjournment CITY of ANDOVER CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 18. 1997 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Approval of Minutes City Clerk D. 0 \ ITEM NO. Approval of Minutes The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes: February 4, 1997 Regular Meeting J '\. / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION / DATE: February 18. 1997 ITEM NO. . Public Hearing/95-14/Crooked Lake Boulevard \, ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Scott Erickson~t Engineering AGENDA SECTION Discussion Item The City Council is requested to hold a public hearing for the Crooked Lake Blvd, reconstruction project, Project 95-14, The preliminary assessment role remains the same as presented at the public hearing held for this project last year. (See attached preliminary assessment role). The proposed assessments are for watermain and sanitary sewer improvements, Similar to last year, it is proposed to defer the assessments without interest until the property owner requests connection. Also, it was indicated last year that there may be some interest in having a concrete sidewalk installed along the west side of Crooked Lake Blvd. from the Coon Rapids border north to Bunker Lake Blvd. ) \ , ,/ / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO, MOTION by Council member to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF STREETS. WATERMAIN. STORM AND SANITARY SEWER PROJECT NO. 95-14 IN THE CROOKED LAKE BOULEVARD AREA AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 140-95 adopted the ~ day of_ August, 19 95, a Feasibility Report has been prepared by Maier-Stewart and Associates for the improvements; and WHEREAS, Resolution No, 026-97 of the City Council adopted on the 21st day of January, 19--9L, fixed a date for a public hearing; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the required published and mailed notice, such hearing was held on the 18th day of February, 19--9L; and WHEREAS, all persons desiring to be heard were given such opportunity for same; and J NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby order improvement Project No, 95-14 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer is to obtain all the necessary drainage and utility easements before construction, MOTION seconded by Council member and adopted by the City Council at a regular with Councilmembers meeting this 18th day of February ,19 97, voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J,E. McKelvey - Mayor . / Victoria Volk - City Clerk .. ,.CITY of ANDOVER' 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 553q4 . (612) 755-5100 January 29, 1997 Re: Crooked Lake Boulevard Reconstruction/Project 95-14 Dear Resident: The Andover City Council will be holding a public hearing for the Crooked Lake Boulevard Street and Watermain Project at 7:00 PM, Tuesday, February 18, 1997 at the Oak View Middle School. . j As you will probably recall, this project was put on hold last year in order to resolve a drainage issue on the project. This issue has since been resolved and the project has been rescheduled to occur this summer. The scope of the project has not changed from what was presented to you last year, The estimated assessment to each property remains the same also. A copy of the preliminary assessment role for this project is attached. During the development of the project there was some renewed interest in the possibility of installing a sidewalk along the west side of Crooked Lake Blvd.. This possibility will be further discussed with the Council and the neighborhood at the public hearing. If you have any questions prior to the meeting, feel free to call me at 755-5100, ext. 130. Sincerely, oJuL Scott Erickson, P.E. City Engineer .' SE:rja Encl. ',. ./ . . , .' -.~,;r J / - .. - .:!g~~~~~~ g~~~8~~~~~~g~~~~~~~~~ 0 ~ ,......,""...C01MC"I ~~~:S~g~~~~~~:~~~:~~: ~ OOW)VlNWllil)V) ~ l..- ~- - .. -- c: . .; ~OOOOO~OO~5~~00000OOO c'oo~ooo 0 ~ ... :2 - 3 0 f-- .. ~ooo~ooo oooooo~oooooooooooooo 0 ~ .. N N N :. ~ J c: . c: ~ fill! 0000000 000000000000000000000 0 u . 0 - ~ '0 . . ~.t- .:t c:... 'iiooo~ooo 800000000000000000000 8 . ~ ~. ., E. S ..: . > ..l! ~ . ~ .0 ~Ol 1~3 o~~g~~~ 000000000000000000000 0 o~~~o~o~V)V)V)V)~~V)~V)V)V)~V) 0 :~ ~ _~~:riS::: _MMM~M~Mc")MM~MM""l'1MMMMM .... NV)V)~OV)Ow)V)V)w)V)~V)V)W)W)V)V)V)~ ~ - '" 30 - .. -- .0 o- Il: 2~ .... u go~~~~~~ 000000000000000000000 0 V)~V)V)~V)V)V)V)W)V)V)V)W)V)W)V)V)V)V)V) ~ .~ ~~~~~.~~ NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN N, .- ~p~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ c: l! c: ~c3" 0 0000000 ggggSgSSgSgSgSggSgggg 0000000 0 tIIMMC"'IC"lMC"It'J MMMMl'1C"1C"1l'1MMMl'1MMMMMMMl'1M .. . .:t.. 'isgggggg 000000000000000000000 0 000000000000000000000 0 _ co G:).<<l.CIO_CQ_CI)_~ CIOCOClOCIOCOCOClOCOQQ<<lClOCIOCIOCOCOC\OCO<<l<<lClOCIO '" SrriC"lP1t')~P1c") MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM~MMMM ..; ,:I" :I r~N_""'N___ '01 I I .. - -- - . G___N_N______________ I' I I d . i . <-; E .lL! ~-QJ-I'" faQJ2tnci"" ~~:~"'_i c(::t~~O: ~80~~~u,j ~c~ct:t:E =.J::~eca<c'O c:U.!!u..~I~ ~w ~ ~ ~11! 49 .8 ; s :~E~~~~i u.><nmc(I](1]0 ~ -i ~ z ~ ~..~ ~ 4 ~~ :caui "'2:E-e lD' ~. -ie! :::ilD~f ~~ ~QJG~ c0 m~ I~~' ~CO O.."e S;em.C~m ~ca I~~C .,,~~ .e U~~..,,- lD C ~ ~ W~ ~~ca O~ W."e ~C U""~ .~~C .B~~ ~""~~Z-i~-~8 ""~~~t:~OO ~~~~-i~liwdB~.."~~..,,O-i~~~~~~ G~ ~e~t:C> .~O-i~-~ ~oc~ ~~~~Ea~~a~~~G~~G~~ci~~~~ OlD~ ~ CC~C oelDoEo~"~o~O ~1~~~s~iEE8~fi~~~~~~~~~;i~N ~ c: ~ .- .Jill: e c '5 E C E N - CD E 1~.JIlI: 0.. """ ca'5~~C~~=~~- ~ C~~ ~lcOlDOCO ~<n~:~~(/)~~::Bo~~~~!~~~~~~ >< ~~~'O'O'O'O ~~ '0 ~ ~'O'O'O'O ~ ~'O ffiffi~ffi~ffiffi ffi~ ffi~ffi~ffiffiffiffiffi~~~ffi ~ffiffi lD Q) QJ lD Q) II Q) G II lD Z cu Z G QJ I) Q) lD Z 2: ZIQ) ~ Z G lD ~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~Z~~~ _1_1_1_1_1_1_1 _I_I~~~C-lC-l-l-l-l~CCC-IGC-l-l ~ ~ 'C '0 'C '0 'C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lD ~ lD '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 lD QJ lDl"'l C G ~ ~ lD Q) CU lD lD G CU .= ~ u U ..:.! ~ ~ ~ ~ .= ~ ~ .: ~I~ ~ 2Il ~ ~ ~ 2Il1 g ~ g g g '8 "8 g g = 5 ~ 5 g = g ~ :3 ~ g 515 :: g -e -e g g :: 0 Q U <'3 0 <'3 (3 (3 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ (3 ~ 0 U U 0 0 ;!;I;J; P'; Ol~ ~ u (3 II co . 0 ,.... N 0 0 M (Q - - M .... M .... M 0 CO) CD en -1- -[0 .... .... 0 U"I ~.N_O ~ N~OO....~O.MN_O~. M_MNO ~(Q(Q(Q~~U"I~ ~~__~.....N~..~.~!;~M,....-MM c( ~ ~ ~ ~ ::: ~ ::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ re .... ::: ::: _ ::: rel~ ~ ::: NI~ ~ ~ Ib ~ ~ :8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :: :: ~ ;0 ;r; N ; ~ 81~1~I;o :; ~I~ ~ ~ OOOlgOoooooo8ooooo8r~oi~i~!~IOOOOOO 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In R-tij}.ij ~ ~ ~I~ ilriilM M .. M .. ..~ '1;!~~~ \1 ~Ji:11~ ;f. _ N'~ll~ljN N M ~ R ~ s:J n M M M n n n r".I ~~n Mln M M M M .!:'I~ M f") CO) M[M CO) CO) CO) MIM M f") M M M M M MIM C"11~~E!~il::ll~ ~ ~ ~ l1.,IX: 0:: a: cr cr cr Q: a: IX: a: 0:: I%. 0:: a: a: o::.rx: IX cr I%. o:::~!~ IX: 0:: cr 0::,1%.,1%. ). .' - ';:1 - - - - ;;v - - !III' - .. N ... M o z -" ~ Ul '" ~ -< .. o .. o a o M .. .. N N M M M a: c;r .. - c::,; , ' ~ . .... '-.-...... ~-.- , - ,~ . (- r I" CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 95-14 CROOKED LAKE BOULEVARD NW ANDOVER, MINNESOTA NOTICE is hereby given that the City of Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Boulevard NW in the City of Andover, on Tuesday, February 18, 1997 at 7:00 PM, or shortly thereafter to consider the making of the following improvements: Watermain, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer and Street Construction .' The property to be assessed for the watermain and sanitary sewer improvements, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429, is within the following described area: From the south City limits of Andover, 133rd Avenue NW to Bunker Lake Boulevard, Anoka County C.SAH. 16, Section 33, Township 32, Range 24, City of Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota. The estimated cost of such improvement is $619,100.00, Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. CITY OF ANDOVER ~/~ Victoria Volk - City Clerk .' ....._ J~ Publication Dates: 1-31-97 2-7-97 2-14-97 33 32 24 31 0007 33 32 24 31 0034 33 322431 0035 Charles & Mary Veiman Clarence & Celc Smith Frank & Karol Bentley 13646 Crooked Lake Blvd, NW 13624 Crooked Lake Blvd, NW 13610 Crooked Lake Blvd, NW Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 \ 33 32 24 42 0056 33 32 24 31 0037 33 32 24 31 0039 ~i Wayne & Rosemary Davids Arthur & D.L. Steinberg Thomas & J,E, Stevenson 13607 Crooked Lake Blvd. NW 13562 Crooked Lake Blvd. NW 13550 Crooked Lake Blvd, NW Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 33 32 24 31 0040 33 3224420047 333224310010 Edith Carlson 33 32 24 31 0053 Marvin or HG Schnickels 13540 Crooked Lake Blvd. NW Carrie Jirasek 13526 Crooked Lake Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 13563 Crooked Lake Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 333224310046 33 32 24 34 0065 333224420011 Gayle & Gary Howard-Rolli James & Tammy Petrik James Junker 2815 - 135th Circle NW 2816 - 135th Circle NW 13503 Crooked Lake Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 333224340011 33 32 24 43 0002 333224340061 Glenn & Connie Harmon Jeffrey & Catherine Swenson Kurt & Larae Dallmann 2811 - 135th Avenue NW 13453 Crooked Lake Blvd, NW 2820 - 135th Avenue NW Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 33 32 24 43 0034 33 32 24 34 0062 33 322443 0047 John & Barbara Baucom Norma Holland Wayne & Diane Patchen \ 13443 Crooked Lake Blvd. NW 8308 Cty Rd 37 NE 13423 Crooked Lake Blvd. NW , Andover, MN 55304 St. Michael, MN 55376 Andover, MN 55304 333224340018 33 32 24 43 0006 333224340019 ill & Laine Domiano Mabel Ottenstroer Michael & Beth Gamache 13418 Crooked Lake Blvd. NW 13409 Crooked Lake Blvd. NW 2815 - 134th Avenue NW Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 33 32 24 34 0040 333224430061 333224340041 John & Donna Kunza Tamara TheIl Michael & CheryIl Buda 2814 - 134th Avenue NW 2764 - 134th Avenue NW 13330 Crooked Lake Blvd, NW Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 33 32 24 43 0064 33 32 24 34 0043 33 32 24 34 0042 Stephen & Laura Nemeth Lane & Marcia Moll Judean LongbeIla 2771 - 133rd Lane NW 2813 -133rdAvenueNW 13320 Crooked Lake Blvd, NW Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 33 32 24 43 0049 333224430001 ~ ~ Robert & MM Hockinson Henry & Elaine Sheppard 13305 Crooked Lake Blvd, NW RR I Box 159A , Andover, MN 55304 Sandstone, MN 55072 \ / 95-14 (labels) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 18. 1997 / AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Planning =t? <-- ITEM NO. I" Bill's Superette - Hanson Store t:X.Traffic Study The City Council on February 4, 1997 discussed the Commercial Site Plan for the proposed Bill's Superette located on the east side of Hanson Boulevard NW between 138th Lane NW and 139th Lane NW. As a result of the discussion, the Council directed staff to contact Rademacher Companies, Inc. and the Anoka County Highway Department and obtain any information that is available in regard to a traffic assessment. David L. Carlberg Community Development Director Traffic Patterns - Bill's Superette Attached is a letter dated February 13, 1997 from Terry Schander & Dave Pilon, Rademacher Companies, Inc. explaining the traffic patterns associated with the Bill's Superette operation, The letter addresses the majority of the issues raised at the council meeting in regard to the amount of traffic anticipated, the peak traffic periods, delivery truck traffic, etc. Traffic - Anoka County Highway Department The Anoka County Highway Department has responded to the Commercial Site Plan of the Bill's Superette. Attached is a letter dated February 10, 1997 from Jane Pemble, Traffic Engineer. Ms, Pemble addresses the Site Distance Requirements for 138th Lane NW, 139th Lane NW and Hanson Boulevard NW (County Road No. 78) and indicates they can be met. Ms. Pemble also indicates the access scheme is acceptable as being proposed and that Anoka County Policy is that access not be allowed to a county highway if access can be made to a city street. Independent Traffic Engineer - Study The City Council discussed the issue of a traffic study being conducted by an independent traffic engineer. In discussing this issue with Rademacher Companies, Inc., it is staffs understanding that Rademacher Companies, Inc. is not willing to pay for the study. A letter is forthcoming from Rademacher Companies, Inc. in regard to this issue. Based on the information provided, does the City Council wish to proceed with a traffic study being conducted by an independent traffic engineer or has th~ letters submitted by Terry Schander & Dave Pilon, Rademacher Companies, Inc, and Jane Pemble, Anoka County Highway Department satisfy the Council's concerns. If the Council wishes to proceed with the study then their needs to be discussion and direction as to who will pay for the study. / Rademacher Companies, Inc. -' Thursday, February 13, 1997 Andover Review Committee Andover, MN 55304 Dear City Staff. Attached is our company's internal traffic study for the Bill's Superette on Hanson Blvd, per your directive from our meeting on Tuesday, February 11, 1997. We have estimated trip counts, individually, for vehicles and for delivery trucks, Counts are projected for each drive entrance/exit, in 30 minute time intervals, Our company thanks the city staff for their time and efforts during this site plan review, Please contact me with any questions concerning the attached study, , ) Sincerely, ~~~ )JML Terry Schander Vice President of Store Operations ~~i,,-- Dave Pilon Area Manager, Bill's Superettes .' AMIPRO'DOCS\ARC,TRAF,SAM REVlSED: 02:1:3197 TAS . ,/ TRAFFIC STUDY - Internal Vehicle Flow and Estimated Trip Counts * CUSTOMER VEHICLES ONLY Bill's Superette - Hanson Blvd. Andover ) , Monday. Friday Drive A Drive A Drive B Drive B Drive C Drive C IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT Satur~ay - Sunday ~_Holidays Drive A Drive A Drive B Drive B Drive C IN OUT IN OUT IN DriveC OUT 05:30 AM 05:59 AM 2 2 06:00 AM 06:29 AM 4 7 5 5 6 3 ..__n_ .______ 06:30AM 06:59AM 6 11 9 9 10 5 ------- _._--- -.------------.-- -- _._---~_. 07:00AM 07:29AM 8 14 11 11 12 6 -----_.._----. 07:30AM 07:59AM 8 14 11 11 12 6 ...- -.--.-.--. -- --.-- ...--..-....----.----.------------ 08:00 AM - 08:29 AM 7 13 10 10 11 6 ________,_________ ___._....___ ...__0- u____________.___ 08:30 AM - 08:59 AM 6 11 9 9 10 5 . _._~ -- -- .. -- .- --~. -. - . --------..-- - --- - -- 09:00 AM - 09:29 AM 5 8 7 8 4 ---- 09:30 AM - 09:59 AM 4 7 5 ._-----------~---_._- ,-----~---- , 10:00 AM 10:29 AM 3 6 '5 5 10:30 AM - 10:59 AM 3 6 5 5 .------ 11:00AM - 11:29AM 4 7 5 5 6 3 -- . --.----- ----.-_. --.----".--.. -.. --------_.__._---~- -----. ------- ------'---- -------------- - ------- 11:30AM - 11:59AM 5 9 7 7 8 4 -------------- . --.--- --- ....----------... 12:00 PM - 12:29 PM 5 9 7 7 8 4 9 12 5 5 12 9 ----------...---- ._n_______.__ _________._ 12:30 PM - 12:59 PM 4 7 5 5 6 3 9 12 5 5 12 9 - ~----_.__. -- ---- --------- --- --_._-_._----~------------ ------- ---------------- 01 :00 PM - 01 :29 PM 4 7 5 5 6 3 9 11 5 5 11 9 --------~--~---_._---- ~-- -----.----------- --- -----_.~--------- 01 :30 PM - 01 :59 PM 3 6 5 5 5 3 8 10 5 5 10 8 - -- -.--.----------- ----------.---- ---------- -----..-----------------.----.--.------.- 02:00 PM - 02:29 PM 4 7 5 5 6 3 7 10 4 4 10 \ ..n ._____ _,___ ___.________ ..,---------,-------'- -----------,--------------'----' , /02:3Q..F'/.il-=-_02:,5.?l'M_ ___~~ 7 7 8 4__....-2__ __9_______~_ u _<I. _._9___ 7 03:00 PM _ 03:29 PM 14 8 10 7 4 13 8 8 5 7 7 5 ___.___u_ on ._____. __.__________________._____________ ____~________________________.______ __n___________ ~--.. 03.:.3Ql'M_:_~~S.~,=M_ ___.!i__~_-.!O_____!..____~_~ __,__~__!l__ ____,5.__,_ J.,,___L_ 5 ..24:00 PM -,,_9.4:29 PM 15 9 11 8 5 14 8 8 5 ?.._,__..:!.__J._ 04:30PM 04:59PM 16 10 11 8 5 14 9 9 6 8 8 6 Time Period 05:00 PM - 05:29 PM 05:30 PM - 05:59 PM ------- ~- ----~--- 06:00 PM - 06:29 PM ____ __ _u_._ ____ ____ 06:30 PM - 06:59 PM ---------.------------------- --- 07:00 PM - 07:29 PM 07:30 PM - 07:59 PM 08:00 PM - 08:29 PM ------- - - ---- 08:30 PM - 08:59 PM - --~-------_._- - 09:00 PM - 09:29 PM 09:30 PM - 09:59 PM ---.------~---- ----- ---- . 10:00 PM - 10:29 PM 10:30 PM - 10:59 PM 11:00PM'1129PM 05:30 AM 11:29 PM 16 16 16 10 10 3 4 2 3 4 2 --------~_.._--- - ----- 3 4 2 2 5 7 3 3 -----------~---------- --. - 6 7 3 3 ---------~----_._-_. -- ---- 7 9 4 4 --._~-----~- 7 10 4 2 3 3 8 - - -- -- --- 8 10 8 7 5 5 4 3 222 " . All figures are estimated at end of first 12 months in operation J '_,_____ ,', 10 16 10 ------- --- - . 16 10 14 8 n'_' _.______ __ 11 7 9 6 8 5 - --- ------ 8 5 6 3 5 3 2 288 277 4 2 4 4 3 7 7 5 6 9 7 4 10 7 6 3 10 8' 10 5 11 11 11 11 11 11 263 8 8 8 7 6 5 3 5 3 5 14 14 14 14 14 13 5 5 5 5 4 3 10 --- ----------.---- 3 8 4 4 3 2 200 2 2 2 4 ----- --- 250 10 10 10 10 9 9 7 7 7 7 5 2 242 9 9 5 5 11 12 9 12 5 7 9 7 9 6 8 4 ---------- 7 7 4 4 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 278 144 5 8 5 9 5 5 9 11 12 9 5 9 12 7 6 6 9 9 8 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 7 7 6 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 1i3 199 264 II I ........., o --.J en - .- co o +-' z en c.. r: __ .....J: s.... Z i I- 01 I "'7""'ll: (/) I \oJ W i (l) ....J i +-' U i CO Ii E ~I I +-' 0::: [ en W [ 21 W 01 1-1 ~I >- ul o i ::> I- CJ) U - u.. u.. <( ~ I- o N 10 ..- pO!Jad alnU!w DE Jad - a^!JP lpea ol NI sd!JJ. /// ,// // ~~/ ~ \ \ I c;:J o ..- 10 - co - oo;;t - N - ..- - 0) - co o ..- ..- o ..- - 0) s ,!:: - 0) C"') ...... -' t-- u Q.) > .;:: o (0 l() , , , -I W' I I , ,!::I -I co , ~l ~I Q.), >' .;:: I 0, I i I -I sl ~l co C"') , ...... (") N ..- ..- ..- o ..- - t-- <( Q.) > . .C o I (0 c;-I ~ I o >-1 ~ ~I ro ';::1 :r: u.: I ,! (!) >- I :::: rol (!) '0 I '- cl (!) 0' a. 0:::::: i ::J 00:::::' C/) ! I (/) co II II I ~ 0 / .,... ---' CJ) 0 ...... ," - - - I S I CO / ' - 0> " " , ..c 4- , , - 0 ///' co (j) C"') ...... l- /' _. .. ( I"- U ::J Q) 0 > - CD ";:: 0 CJ) >-: - LO 0..--1 i .- z s.....o -I ~ W I I-(f) - i I I "'C w ..cl --I ('I') - . - 001 Q) U C"'), +-I J:. ...... ' 1 rn w. - N -I E >. aJl Q) I 0:::' > 1 wi - ...... ";:: I +-I CJ) 2l 0 I UJ 01 N I 1-1 ...... I (f)l I , - ::)j ...... S >- UI ...... 0 I 0 ..c - ::J I ..- 00 I C"') ~!l l- I ...... I I I I - 0> - "C I I (f) : <( > ! Q) a:l i co > I:: i 0 ";:: 0 >-1 0 C/l rol I::"C - l"- I ro .-, LL J: ....! lJ..i LL I I I Q) >- <( to = ro r Q) "C I .... 1::1 cr: <t Q) oi -- ------- ---..--- g- ~I I- 0 \!') 0 \!') 0 Cf) I I N ..- ..- C/l I popad alnU!w O~ Jad - a^pp lpea jO .Lno sdp.L a:l ....... o ---' CJ) - ," co o +-I z CJ) 0.. >- : __ ...J; s..... Zi J- 0 I ~ (f) I \,J W I Q) --I! +-I U I rn J: I E ~I +-I 0:::: CJ) WI UJ ~I I ~f >- [51 o I ::J . I- (f) o - LL LL <( cr: I- ...... ~ ...... - ---- ~ -.-p.- .- 0 ...... 0> - CO r-- -- to .n~ U ! I Q) i - LO > ! ";:: 0 - ~ I - C") a:l Q) > ";:: - N 0 I I - ..- I <( ! N Q) > ..- ";:: 0 ..- I ..- 0 ..- - en - CO - f'- -- to _ ._..._____.__n_ ___. ____..___.____~__ __ ___ _..i.._. \!') ..- o ..- \!') pOp ad alnu!w O~ Jad - a^pp lpea Ol NI sdP.L o ;J a:l rol c:Q o 01 ~ J: I ro - J: >., I ~I ~ 31 Q) Cf) ! .... i Q) -' c. >.. ::l rol Cf) "C I ~I _C/l m I = Cf)! a:l . . I ! ....... 0 ...... ---' ~ ...... ,.- .- CJ) I 0 ...... - ," - i , CO I .. 0> I 4- ) 0 - co / , l- i r-- ::J 0 - to I , U I CJ) . Q) r 0.. >- ' - \!') > I --I ' .- Z I ";:: s..... 0: 0 I- if) l - ~ I "'C W. a:l --Ii - C") Q) U' Q) +-I -I > rn J:[ ";:: W. - N 0 E >f I 0:::' +-I wi - ..- CJ) 2' <( UJ 01 N Q) > 1-1 ..- ";:: if)l ---, 0 ::)f ..- I >- oi ..- , , - 0 ; , , 0 I ---' ::J f ..- - ~ l- I f - en (f) I , I a:l rol ! ~ co c:Q 0 I o of ~ J: I - f"- ro - u.. J: >., I ~i u.. Q) c to :::: :J, <( Q) Cf)! .... , cr: Q) _! C. >.' -- -- --~--- . . -- -- ----- ------ -..-. ::I roi I- Cf) "C, \!') 0 \!') 0 .... : ::Ii ..- ..- _C/l m I popad alnU!W O~ Jad - a^pp lpea jO .Lno sdP.L -Cf) ii5 ! ! I> o o o o o I',: r: : _ _:> ~..~_ C::$ '=~ Z I> '~UI 'saluedwo:> Ja4~eWape~ :I\q pamdaJd o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 --.-----.--.--.-------------------- -- a 0 0 0 0 o o o . o o o 0 0 0 0 0 -----~----_._------_._---- o 0 0 0 0 0 ------ ---~---~----- --~-------- -------.- o 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 o 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o L u o 0 0 0 .- .-----..-.---.---- o 0 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o n o o o -- a o o o o o o 0 o 0 o o ---~--- o o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 - --. ----~--~--- -_._-~---------- o 0 0 0 0 0 . ---..----------- -.- _..~----- - ------------------.--- o 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o - -------- --------------.-----------_._.._-~ o 0 0 0 0 0 - .---- --.--- ----~_. ----~-------- o 0 0 0 0 0 . -- -------------~.- ------.-- o 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o ~no ~ a^IJO o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 ~no NI NI o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ~no NI 'cIa^IJO :> a^IJO 8 a^IJO 8 a^IJO 'cI a^IJO sAep!lOH - Aepuns - AepJ"les J :-...',' .:: =~.r .'!'_,,,'=I::=_ ~I:::'!" _'.os!::::. uOljeJado UI S4lUOW Z ~ jSJU )0 pua je pajewljsa am saJn5!) 1I'c1 . 9 I> l o Wd 6Z:~~ W'o' Ot:SO t o o o ," 0 o o o V\Id 6Z: ~ ~ V\Id 00: ~ ~ V\Id 6S:0 ~ - V\Id Ot:O ~ ------------ V\Id 6Z:0 ~ - V\Id 00:0 ~ ---------- --- V\Id 6S:60 - V\Id Ot:60 V\Id 6Z:60 - V\Id 00:60 o o o 0 0 o 0 0 .---------------..--. o 0 0 o o o o o o o o V\Id 6S:eO - V\Id Ot:eo ---------------- V\Id 6Z:eO - V\Id oo:eo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 .----------------- o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 --. o 0 0 0 o V\Id 6S:LO - V\Id Ot:LO -~-----------_.. V\Id 6Z:LO V\Id OO:LO V\Id 6S:90 V\Id Ot:90 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o V\Id 6Z:90 V\Id 6S:S0 V\Id 6Z:S0 V\Id 00:90 V\Id m::so - I'\Id OO:SO I'\Id 6S:1'O - I'\Id Ot:I>O I'\Id 6Z:1>0 - I'\Id 00:1>0 o 0 ..--- ------------ o 0 0 0 0 0 -------- - --- a 0 0 0 0 0 I'\Id 6Z:tO - I'\Id OO:tO ------------- .- - --- ~--- - o 0 0 0 I'\Id 6S:Z0 - I'\Id Ot:ZO -~--------------_._- --.-- --.- ---------------. .-- o 0 0 0 I'\Id 6Z:Z0 - I'\Id OO:ZO --~----~-- ------- ------------.- ------..-.----- ------ - -----.-. o 0 0 0 0 I'\Id 6S: ~O - I'\Id at: ~O --_....-- .------------.-- o 0 0 0 0 I'\Id6Z:~0 - I'\IdOO:W --_._._~ -. -. ----._- ---~- ----. --- a 0 0 0 0 0 I'\Id 6S:U - I'\Id Ot:Z~ _._-_._--------~-------_. -.-.- _.- -- -------.-..--.----- o 0 0 0 0 0 I'\Id 6Z:U - I'\Id OO:Z~ ---~---- ---_._--~---- --- ------- -----.------ o 0 0 0 0 0 1'\I'cI 6S: ~ ~ - 1'\I'cI at: ~ ~ o o o o I'\Id 6S:tO - I'\Id Ot:tO o 0 -------- - o 0 o o o 0 0 1'\I'cI 6Z: ~ ~ . 1'\I'cI 00: ~ ~ --- --~_._-- -----. - ----------.- o 0 1'\I'cI6S:0~ - 1'\I'cI Ot:o~ o 0 0 0 0 1'\I'cI6Z:0~ - 1'\I'cI00:0~ _________.__~____.__________._________ ___u.__. __._____.___ _._ o 0 0 0 0 1'\1\1 6S:60 - 1'\1\1 Ot:60 ----------_.---------- --------- ---.--- ------------. ------ a 0 0 0 0 0 1'\1\1 6Z:60 - 1'\1\1 00:60 o 0 0 0 0 0 1'\1\1 6s:eo - 1'\I'cI o>;:eo o o o o o o o o o o o o o 1'\1\1 6z:eo 1'\1\1 6S:l0 1'\1\1 6Z:LO 1'\1\1 6S:90 - 1'\1\1 oo:eo . 1'\1\1 Ot:LO 1'\1\1 OO:lO 1'\1\1 0>;:90 o 0 o o o o o o 0 o 0 o 0 o o 1'\1\1 6Z:90 - 1'\1\1 00:90 1'\1\1 6S:S0 - 1'\I'cI ot:SO pO!Jad aw!~ o o o 0 ~no NI :> a^!JO :> a^IJO . - o o ~no NI ~no 8 a^IJO 8 a^IJO 'cI a^IJO AeP!J:l - Aepuow NI 'cI a^IJO Ja^opu,," l\eplJ.::l - I\epuol'\l 'I\ep Jad (Z) OMl aq \I'M juno~ ~al!eJ~-!was. pajew1ls3 .. "P^18 UOSUl!H - anaJadns S.1I!8 .. A lNO s)I:>mu AH3^1l30 . SlUnO::> dpl paleW!lS3 pue Mal:! ap!4a^ leuJalul - AOnlS ::>I:!:!'v'~l , , +-I 0 ..- --.J 1 ..- en 1 0 ...... - - - S I I CO en I . I ..c I - t 0 (j) , . co C"') I +-I ...... i . -I I Z t-- U , l Q) > to ";:: CJ) 0 0.. -I< \!') I -I< . .- j s..... >-, I I- -I . _I zl '<:t W I "U 01 I t . ..c Q) (f)i C") - I 00 +-I ~: C"') , rn Ul ...... l ::)i '-'" ! E N i 0:::: a:l i I-i Q) . i 1 .pJ >-! ...... > I ) en ";:: I 0:::1 0 UJ Wi t >1 N I ..- -. -Ii WI - >- 01 ..- S I ..- 0 I , I l ; I 0 ..c ::J ..- - 00 I- C"') ~--l ...... (f) en - ..) <( "> "- cl Q) a:l I ~ . co 0 p. > I:: '1 ";:: 0 0 >'1 - C/l ro' LL / t-- ! I:: "C I ,/ co .t::1 LL 1 J: lJ..: I . <( CD Q) >.' .... ro: - 0::: Q) "C I Qi I:: I- "' c. o. \!') LO LO 0 :J ~: ..- Cf) f"- 0 N 0 0 C/l ) popad alnU!W O~ Jad - a^pp 4::>ea Ol NI SdP.L a:l ./ '\ ) ; , ) i j +-I o --..J (/) - - i I I 1 ; I ! I CJ) ~ l c.. ~ .- >- s.....--I I-Z o "UU) Q)~ ro ~l .~ I-! en ffi t UJ > I >- g I o i :::> I- (f) o - LL LL <( 0:: .' I- ..- - .- co '+- o I- ::J o LO I""- o \!') o \!') N o ..- ..- ..- o ~i - N o popad alnu!w O~ Jad - a^pp lpea 10 .Lno sdP.L -I Sl en co ..c - (j) C"') ...... - f"- u Q) > ";:: o I to \!') - ~w C") ..c - 00 C"') ...... - ...... a:l Q) > ";:: o I N ...... - ..- ..- S o ...... ..c - 00 C"') ...... - <( .~ f .... o I CD ;l a:l I g >.1 ~ rot ro :Q I J: L.. i l.L.i I 11 Q) >.1 ::::: co: Q) "C! .... c' ~ .g: ::I 0::::' Cf) i C/l (I) / '., " I I i i I f :'1 .:<j "I ( , '.~ " ,', '- ./ ~ , ,-', 'Y. , . - --- --.. -- -- - -... . , , , , , , , , . , , .~.~;.. -. ~.q~Ln-- ~ ~ ~ 'I :1) , :i, .., l --'111"'- ~.~ y . .. : ~ r~ m;~ "" -'1~ (~)--- . , , , , . . ~.- 0::-==0 . . -I u: , . , , , , , , , , , , - - -- -: ~- - h..:J ;"// .I ..,;. . .' '..... -I' III , l'"t " : ., ." " ~~ .. II ,,,'I 'j : ..'~ v.l': Ii ~~ ::1 ,J , II "".11-' j .== lft..t,tttt'f L_. J II .-(-- I A,. ~ " /" i .;. ", . '. ~; .-.,..,}.. _1'--.. ~ '. '. x.. .jl'-" . '-....' ." ;- :,' '<"'7~ t ,.' . ,J"~"I,'I/ .,..... . ~..../ -~ ~ ~ ~1~1~'~;dH:- . )' iD 8 ~ 8 ~ ;:.:- -~I "~,. - 3d ,;' ~ N{\fr'),J".,1I/ 'W I- V \\ ':. '~:. u "'o>[J.. 't) '. .1}-,:'},J . y.:'. u ~ - ~1~- ~. ~i --pI, . l"Il...~l Ui '~ " i.::;'Jii:n ~~ ;;.: :,'! ~~: J ,," :~ ;:: 8i z_~( ~ 0 ,~ ",""10' . --1-- / tl:!i ., COUNTY OF ANOKA Public Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 (612) 754-3520 FAX (612) 754-3532 JANE K. PEMBLE Traffic Engineer -:--., .-- ....."; "-' .........". . February 10, 1997 Todd Haas City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, MN. 55304 RE: Preliminary Plat Bill's Superette - Hanson Site Dear Todd: . I',., , ./ We have reviewed the site plan for Bill's Superette - Hanson site, to be located east of CSAH 78 (Hanson Boulevard) and north of 138th Lane within the City of Andover, and I offer the following comments: Existing right-of-way adjacent to CSAH 78 should be adequate for future reconstruction purposes (75 feet total R/W width east of CSAH 78 centerline). It appears that all Sight Distance Requirements can be met for this development. The City and the Developer shall ensure that development of this property will not create sight obstructions for either intersection (138th Lane/139th Lane). Signs and plantings must be relocated to where they will not interfere with sight distance. The access scheme for this site is acceptable as shown. Anoka County Policy dictates that if a parcel has access to a county highway and a city street, access for that parcel is to be made entirely from the city street. Since this parcel has access to a city street, no accesses will be permitted along CSAH 78, and right- of-access along CSAH 78 shall be dedicated to Anoka County. Calculations must be submitted along with a grading and erosion control plan that delineates the drainage areas. The post-developed rate/volume of runoff must not exceed the pre-developed rate/volume of runoff from the 10 year, 24- hour storm, utilizing the "SCS Method" with a curve number determined using Group C soils as a minimum. A permit for work within the County Right-of-Way is required and must be obtained prior to the commencement of any construction. Contact Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator for this department, for further information regarding the permit process. Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer -2- Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, -\.\ ') . '\. i . / \~\\~ } .' Jane Pemble Traffic Engineer .1 xc: Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator xc: Skip Anderson, County Surveyor dmh/lBILLS .' . .I Regular Minutes Page 4 Andover City Council Meeting February 4, 1997 / COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN/BILL'S SUPERETTE/HANSON BOULEVARD NW Mayor McKelvey informed those present that the legal opinion from John Bannigan of Bannigan & Kelly, P.A., the independent attorney selected by the City and residents of the Hills of Bunker Lake, basically agreed with the City Attorney's opinion that the Special Use Permit was in effect. He also noted a list of recommendations regarding the site plan from the residents; and Rademacher and Associates, Inc., has agreed with many of them. The Mayor explained the size of the structure is allowed per ordinance in that district. Rademacher and Associates has changed the celor scheme to blend with the area. They have tripled the amou~t of money for landscaping to provide barriers and buffers. They have said it may be possible to move the building five feet forward to provide more buffer in the back. However, they were net willing to pay for the cost of installing a pump for storm water. Rademacher and Associates has said they will build a monument sign on the road rather than the standard high sign, and they would wor~ as much as possible to make it blend into the community. \. / Mr. Carlberg stated the signage on the building itself has not been discussed, but: they will be required to comply with the regulations. Hayer McKelvey st:aced at this point. the project is allowed to move ahead. He didn't know what else could be done, other than negotiate to have them move to the west side of Hanson Eoulevard. But the State is not willing to sell the property to the City at this point. He was told by Rademacher and Associates that if the City does not have that land by i\pril, they wi].l proceed with tl:e construction on the east side of Hanson Boulevard as planned. Patrick J. Fugina, Attorney at Law, stated the residents made 21 suggestions regarding the site plan. He highlight.ed three major ones. First, they are concerned with the size of t:he building, as the propesed size exceeds what is needed to serve the neighborhood. By definicion, the Neighborhood Business zone may be used for ret.ail sales and services to serve the surrounding neighborhood. p~ 8,400 square-foot grocery store is more than a neighborhood business and is clearly designed to attract customers from other areas. Their second concern is with the ingress and egress. They are designed to use residential streets of 13Sth and 139th Lanes. Those roads were designed to residential standards, not commercial standards. He has not been able to find other businesses located on major roads that do not have direct access to the main road. There are concerns because of the traffic problems at the intersections of 138th and 139th Lanes and Hanson Boulevard, the line of sight and safety hazards accessing Hanson Boulevard, and the safety concerns because children will be attracted to the facility. Their solution is that the access to Bill's Superette be directly from Hanson Boulevard and that 138th and 139th Lanes would remain residential streets. In speaking with the county about this, he understands they do not: want it; but it is also the City's decision. The third maj or concern of the residents is the necessity of a buffer between the rear of Bill's Suoerette and the residents that live behind it. With th~ size of the .structure and parking lot plus the construction of two large holding ponds, no trees will be left as a buffer. / , / , , / Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - February 4, 1997 Page 5 (Commercial Site Plan/Bill's Superette/Hanson Boulevard NW, Continued) buffer. A potential solution is to install a pumping station to pump water directly into the pond so the ponds will not be needed or coul~ be made smaller. He felt the City bears some responsibility to paying for the pump because some of the houses were allowed to be built below grade, so the water from the project site cannot be diverted into Pond C. If the pump was installed, the ponds would not have to be constructed, and a large stand of trees could remain to provide the buffer to the residents. As it is, the tree plantings will take years before they provide an acceptable buffer. He urged the Council to work to preserve the stand of oak trees as a buffer. Mr. Fugina felt the Council has the authority and the obligation to provide the relief the residents are seeking and to protect the health, safety and welfare of the residents. Council discussion was on the residents' proposal of a direct ingress and egress from Hanson Boulevard. Staff stated they are not ma~ing that recommendation. If the City streets are destroyed' as a result oi the heavy commercial traffic, the properties on either side will be assessed for the reconstruction. In this case, it would be Bill's Superette. Mr. Carlberg stated the Special Use Permit stated the City will review the site plan; there is no reference to the City Council doing that review. The size of the building is allowed per ordinance. Rademacher and Associates is attempting to screen the facilities as much as they can. The normal setbac~ from the residential property line is 35 to 40 feet. This structure will be over 100 feet back from the property to the east. This area is also higher than the adjacent property to the east. Councilmember Orttel felt there should be something more objective in the ordinance as to what area the zone should service, which could then relate to the size of the building. Hanson Boulevard has the pctencial of being a divided highway, so the business could potentially have only a right-in and right-out access. His concern is the traffic issue. It is 585 feet between the two streets, and he understands the county has the 60Q-foot rule. But adding traffic to 138th and 139th Lanes when the traffic today is dodging cars on Hansen Boulevard will create an unbearable situation. He wondered if just a northbound right-in lane off Hanson Boulevard would help alleviate some of the problems. Also, he has observed that in similar situations, many of the 9arking stalls are empty most of the time. He wondered if any of the hard surface for the parking area could be reduced. Mr. Carlberg stated 40 parking stalls are being proposed, and they are required to have 34 spaces per the ordinance. He is not sure what a difference that would make to the green space and ponding if those five or six parking stalls are eliminated. .' Councilmember Orttel felt there.'is a massive blacktop area and wondered if the matter deserves further consideration. He also questioned the size of the ponds, stating it looks as if they are 10 to 11 feet deep. He felt the ponds could be more contoured, leaving more green area. Mr. / Erickson explained the watershed requirements and restric~ions and sloping requirements. The ponds are designed to the lOa-year storm. Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - February 4, 1997 Page 6 J (Commercial Site Plan/Bill's Superette/Hanson Boulevard NW, Continued) Mr. Boyum explained the Coon Creek Watershed Board has taken the position that projects should not affect adjoining properties. Post development drainage is to remain the same as pre-development runoff. The water will stay on site longer but will not leave the site anv faster than before the development. The system is designed to the worse: case scenario, which is the lOO-year event. Discussion continued with several residents in the audience clarifying the storm drainage issue. Discussion then returned to the traffic situation. Councilmember Dehn was very concerned with the truck traffic coming in at l38th Lane and leaving via l39th Lane, the problem with the sharp curves those trucks have to make to get onto the City streets and then onto Hanson Boulevard and the potential congestion along the City streets with trucks, potential customer and residential traffic in the same area. While she understands the county's position for not wanting an access directly onto Hanson Boulevard, she felt in this case it would be advisable to alleviate some of the traffic concerr.s into the neighborhood. Mr. Erickson stated the residential roads would be posted for weight restrictions in the spring, and all vehicles ccmir.g to and from the site will need to meet them. He will check with Rademacher and Associates to be sure they are aware of that. I \. / Councilmember Knight stated he has witnessed the terrible visibility problem on 13Bth Lane. If that is to be the main entrance to this project, he didn't know what the City could do about it. Mr. Ericksen stated typically site distances are taken care of when the streets are built, but that should be looked at again. Staff would not like to see the access off Hanson Boulevard, but the county has agreed to a right-in only accesses in the past. Mayor McKelvey stated if the City installs a cul-de-sac on l38th Lane as has been suggested by some residents, the traffic would be using l39th Lane, which is farther away from the curve. That, of course, would not make the residents along l39th Lane very happy. A resident asked if the business would be open 24 hours a day. If so, it would be doing a disservice to the immediate residential area. It would only be serving those people who live north on Hanson Boulevard. They felt the City should be able to dictate the hours of operation. The Council did not know the proposed hours of operation, but the City has nothing that would regulate the 24-hour status. There was a debate on the Council's ability to set the hours of operation, as the residents and Mr. Fugina argued the City has the ability to protect the health, safety and welfare of the residents by setting hours of operation, the size of the operation, traffic flow, etc. Attorney Hawkins pointed out the ability to regu;Late hours of operation is not governed by the ordinance. Many of the other issues have already been addressed and th~ City's position confirmed by an independent attorney. The site plan review is to address traffic, landscaping, buffers, etc., which is what the Council is addressing now. / Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - February 4, 1997 Page 7 J (Commercial Site Plan/Bill's Superette/Hanson Boulevard NW, Continued) Councilmember Orttel explained the history of zoning the site before the property was developed so everyone moving in would be aware of those plans. A resident agreed, but they were told there would be a large buffer of trees, not the site clear cut and two ponds established. Another resident stated just because the ordinances are being meL. doesn't make it right. The residents disagreed with the opinion that the 1988 decision still stands. When the Council stated the Special Use Permit was still in effect, it did so withouc involving the neighborhood. which they felt was a big mistake. Still another resident felt a traffic assessment needs to be done to support restrictions to the development. Their position is the improvement is significantly harmful to their neighborhood, their property values and potentially to their children. i , I Further discussion was that the county has already done a traffic study for Hanson Boulevard and in all likelihood, Rademacher and Associates ~as done one for the proposed project. Some residents and Councilmernbers felt an independent traffic asse:3sment should be dcne. Specific quescions to address would be amount of traffic anticipated eac~ day and the times of the day of the highest vo:Lume, the numlJer of delivery tr~J.cks each day, the amount of t.raffic increase and cOl1ges~ion that will be added to the residential streets of 138th and 139th Lanes, the visibility and site distance problems on Hanson Boulevard from 138th and 139th Lanes and any other safety issues. Rademachercand Associates should also be able to provide projected daily traffic, peak hours of business and from which direction that traffic will be coming. Mr. Carlberg stated the developer has said they are gearing more toward pea~~ evening hours when people will be coming hone from work. The Council pointed out that any decision to block off IJ8th Lane to the residential area is a local issue and not that of the developer or the county. Residents noted the reason for the suggestion was to eliminate traffic from cutting through the neighborhood to access Bunker Lake Boulevard. They also argued the traffic study could be used to place restrictions on the development such as reducing tl:e size of the building and locating the ingress and egress points. The Council cautioned that a study would not stop the development. Mr. Erickson stated it is doubtful the intersection of 139th Lane and Hanson Boulevards meets warrants at this time for a traffic signal, but ir. probably will in the future, especially if there is commercial development on the west side of Hanson. Councilmember Dehn asked if the restrictions applied to che fuel ta~ks for the SuperAmerica station on the corner of Hanson and Bunker Lake Boulevards can be applied to this project. Mayor McKelvey stated all stat'e requi~ements and the same type of tanks will be used. .'A.. residen:: stated she spoke on behalf of the people in the neighborhood that no'll they feel no one is advocating what is in their besc incerest. They are not going away; and unless the people are heard, this is only going t~ , / get worse. illlother also hoped after this is over that the Council will update the ordinances and incorporate more restriccions to protect the Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - February 4, 1997 Page 8 , / (Commercial Site Plan/Bill's Superette/Hanson Boulevard NW, Continued) residents so something like this does not happen again. Councilmember ~,ight stated the Council is sympathetic but has legal obligations as well. Mayor McKelvey stated he will be working and negotiating with Rademacher and Associates to the last day in an attempt to have the business located elsewhere in the City. Attorney Hawkins advised that if the Council feels a traffic study is warranted because of the safety concerns with the ingress and egress to one county road, they have the authority to requlre one. It was not required on the SuperAmerica and Spur developments because there were two accesses onto two different county roads in each of those cases. This is a different situation. While the Council was open to an independent traffic assessment, Staff was asked to first contact Rademacher and Associates and the county to obtain whatever information is already available. Independen~ engineers may have already been hired to do the studies. Also when reviewing the site pl~n, an effor~ must be made to minimize the drainage issue and to save as l~any trees as possible to buffer the residential area. NON-CONF0R11ING HOME OCCUP.~TIONS, CONTINUED .. / Mr. Carlberg asked for direction on how to proceed '.vi th the non- conforming home occupations provision of Ordir.ance 8, Section 4.30, Home Occupations. Cot::lcil;ne:mber Gretel stated he j.s :i.n favar of elim.inating the need for inspections on property that doesn't anticipate public traffic. Chief Winkel explained the Uniform Fire Code recommends inspections on an annual basis, but it does not require them. They are obligated to inspect places once they know about them and to be sure they meet code. Mr. Almgren stated the Building Department does inspections once construction is started. When it is completed, inspections are not done unless they know of a health, safety and welfare issue. .' Mayor McKelvey asked if "public traffic" applies to the person who plCKS up a finished cabinet from the home cabinet shop. If the neighbors haven't complained about a home occupation, should the City get involved? He preferred just grandfathering all of the non-conforming business that were in existence prior to May 15, 1990, when the ordinance was modified and then strictly enforced. If there was ever a question as to whether the business operated before that time, documentation would be required to prove it such as tax statements, receipts or personal testimony of others. Other Councilmembers tended to agree but '"ere concerns that something may be grandfathered that would be a problem. There was also a suggested that two vehicles be allowed for business use. "_J After further discussion, the Council generally agreed to grandfather all non-conforming businesses operating in the City prior 1:0 May 15, 1990, with the condition that the provision on outdoor storage be CITY OF ANDOVER AGENDA SECTION r-n Discussion REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 18, 1997 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM r-n Non-Conforming Home Occupations Planning 4 BY: Jeff Johnson 3; REQUEST ;:'"-.., ,-c ,~.,;'! ., . '.- "''r-._'~ ;:,_~ i,;. The City Council is asked to table this item. Staffh3s reviewed the ordinance arid ...., ..... requests that this item be discussed at the next Stafli'Council Workshop. . . \ I , '_ J MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION , / DATE: February 18. 1997 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Administration Richard Fursman/Pat Janssen ITEM NO. L/ 0 Award Bid/Proj. #94-30A/Furniture Contract, Cont. Request: The Andover City Council is requested to consider for approval the furniture contract for the new city hall addition. History: On December 19,1996 the City Council requested City Staff to obtain bids for furnishing the city hall addition. Prior to that directive, a budget of $11 0,000 was set during the 1996 budget planning session in anticipation of the new addition. Once a floor plan of the addition was approved and the project budget established, a staff committee was formed to research needs and evaluate product lines. Committee members took several tours, met with numerous factory representatives, and weighed various options. Bid specifications were finally drawn / for typical works stations and offices, enabling the City to go for competitive bids. Andover requested bids on four typical offices matching the space of the addition. The following are the results of those bidders who met bid requirements: Company Manufacturer Corporate Express Hon Company-Terrace Design Wise Technion Richard Nash & Assoc. ALLSTEEL Facility Systems Ethospace Interiors Design Wise and Corporate Express were requested to a (see print insert as two companies were nearly identical in cost. Subsequent design refinement indicated little cost differential between the two companies with Design Wise slightly lower. The staff committee convened to discuss the pros and cons of each system and has made the recommendation to select Design Wise. Advantages of Design Wise were in design, adaptability, looks, simplicity, quality, product history and representation. The modified bids indicate a price of approximately $85,000 for the system. Staff is requesting the council authorize a bid amount not to exceed $90,000 so minor changes which are needed can be made to the layout. If the order is placed February 19, delivery will be sometime around April 5-10. , , A preliminary cost estimate for chairs is at $10,000. Once this item is more refined it will be brought back to the Council. )0] Q~E~19~~~~~ February 12, 1997 Ms. Pat Janssen City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 Dear Pat: On behalf of Teknion and Design Wise, I want to personally thank: all of you for the opportunity to work with each of you on your future space and overall working environment. The enclosed proposal is a sell price that closely represents the final space plan and design for your future space. Upon your approval in selecting Teknion as your product of choice, I will need to individually meet with each department head to discuss any final changes before ordering. 'j In addition, this bid was quoted using grade A pricing for the fabric panels. If you were to select a pattern with a higher grade, your panel cost would be priced incrementally per the grade specified. Also, in these meetings we will be able to determine product that may be unnecessarily proposed or specifications that may need upgrading suchas, tempered glass as opposed to plexi-glass, white board inserts, paper management or changing the position of a complete office. I look forward to your decision in this matter and for the opportunity to see the outcome of our design. I am confident that when all is completed, your city hall will project a positive image for both the citizens and employees ofth~J2ity of Andover.]/ / encl. ) 1375 Wolters Boulevard, Suite #103/ Vadnais Heights, Minnesota 55110 / 612'481'9027 / Fax 612'481'9088 February 12, 1997 , / City of Andover - Furniture Plan and Final Procurement Total Teknion Retail: $ 183,389.00 Add-Ons: (Not included in the following bill of materials) 26 Articulating Keyboards wI Mouse Pads $ 3 Comer shelves, Laminate, mounting Brkts $ 3 Power Module Panels: 2 @ 42 x 81 Ht. 1 @ 42 x 66 Ht. 275.00 180.00 $ 7,150.00 $ 540.00 $2,582.00 $ 2,582.00 Subtotal: $ 193,661.00 Less 62% Discount: Installation: $ 73,591.18 $ 4.200.00 Total: $ 77.791.18 ) Note: Upon your request a breakdown bill of material will be made available for each area along with a enlarged layout. Sales tax will be applied during invoicing (if applicable). Color samples and catalogue pictures available upon request. , / 7rl.D~ CITY OF ANDOVER - FURNITURE PLAN 2110/97 2:50:21 PM , / Qty Product List Price Unit Extended Panel Twe: 42A 42 HIGH GRADE A Top Trim Upper Access Door Base Element Inner Outer Frame 1R..-? PAA06..-A? AD..-An PAA26..-A? PAA06..-A? AD..-A?? PAA26..-A? 2 PE4236, E, 42A Power Panel Frame, 42"h x 36"w 447.00 894.00 2 PE4248, E, 42A Power Panel Frame, 42"h x 48.w 535.00 1,070.00 Panel T}pe: 51A STANDARD Inner Outer Frame Top Trim 1R..-E Upper PAAI5..-A? PAAI5..-A? Access Door AD..-A?E AD..-A?E Base Element PAA26..-A? PAA26..-A? 1 PM5136, E, 51A Modular Power Panel Frame, 51"h x 36"w 535.00 535.00 / Panel T we: 51P PASS-TIIRU UPPER I Inner Outer Frame Top Trim 1R..-E Upper PTKI5..E Access Door AD..-A?E AD..-A?E Base Element PAA26..-A? PAA26..-A? 2 PM5136, E, 51P Modular Power Panel Frame, 51"h x 36"w 520.00 1,040.00 . / INVALID FINISHES \ PRELIMINARY DWG Page: 7rG~ CITY OF ANDOVER - FURNITURE PLAN )Qty Product Panel Type: 66A 66 IDGH GRADE A Inner Outer Top Trim Upper 2 PAAI5..-A? PAAI5..-A? Upper I PAAIL-A? PAAI5..-A? Access Door AD..-A7? AD..-A7? Base Element PAA26..-A? PAA26..-A? 4 PM6624, E, 66A Modular Power Panel Frame, 66"h x 24"w 4 PM6636, E, 66A Modular Power Panel Frame, 66"h x 36"w 2 PM6642, E, 66A Modular Power Panel Frame, 66"h x 42"w 4 PM6642, E, 66A Modular Power Panel Frame, 66"h x 42"w 3 PM6648, E, 66A Modular Power Panel Frame, 66"h x 48"w i . , 9 PM6648, E, 66A Modular Power Panel Frame, 66"h x 48"w 1 PM6660, E, 66A Modular Power Panel Frame, 66"h x 6O"w I 1NV ALID FINISHES \ PRELIMlNARY DWG 2110/97 2:50:21 PM List Price Unit Extended Frame 1R.-? 608.00 2,432.00 733.00 2,932.00 787.00 1,574.00 787.00 3,148.00 835.00 2,505.00 835.00 7,515.00 942.00 942.00 Page: 2 7rtE~ CITY OF ANDOVER - FURNITURE PLAN 2110/97 2:50:21 PM /Qty Product List Price Unit Extended Panel Type: 66G GLASS IN UPPER I Inner Outer Frame TR..-E Top Trim Upper 2 Upper I Access Door Base Element PAAI5..-A? PTSI5..E5 AD..-A?E PAA26..-A? PAAI5..-A? AD..-A?E PAA26..-A? 1 PM6660, E, 66G Modular Power Panel Frame, 66"h x 6Q"w 981.00 981.00 Panel Type: 66G1 66 HIGH GRADE A Inner Outer Frame Top Trim TR..-? Upper 2 PAAI5..-A? PAAI5..-A? Upper I PTSI5..?5 Access Door AD..-A71 AD..-A71 Base Element PAA26..-A? PAA26..-A? 4 PM6648, E, 66G1 Modular Power Panel Frame, 66"h x 48"w 871.00 3,484.00 / Panel Type: 66G2 66 HIGH GRADE A Inner Outer Frame Top Trim TR..-? Upper 2 PTSI5..71 Upper I PTSI5..?5 Access Door AD..-A71 AD..-A71 Base Element PAA26..-A? PAA26..-A? 1 PM6624, E, 66G2 Modular Power Panel Frame, 66"h x 24"w 672.00 672.00 3 PM6648, E, 66G2 Modular Power Panel Frame, 66"h x 48"w 907.00 2,721.00 INVALID FINISHES \ PRELIMlNAR Y DWG Page: 3 7rtE~ CITY OF ANDOVER - FURNITURE PLAN 2110/97 2:50:21 PM ,; Qty Product list Price Unit Extended Panel Type: 66GT GLASS ON TOP ELEMENf Inner Outer Frame TR..-E Top Trim Upper 2 Upper I Access Door Base Element PTSI5..E5 PAAI5....,A? AD..-A?E PAA26..-A? PAAI5..-A? AD..-A?E PAA26..-A? 4 PM6636, E, 66GT Modular Power Panel Frame. 66"b x 36"w 760.00 3.040.00 Panel Type: 66T 66 mGH GRADE A - TACKABLE Inner Outer Frame Top Trim TR..-? Upper 2 PAAI5..-A? PAAI5..-A? Upper I PTAI5..-A? PAAI5..-A? Access Door AD..-A?? AD..-A?? Base Element PAA26..-A? PAA26..-A? 3 PM6630, E, 66T Modular Power Panel Frame. 66"h x 30"w 648.00 1.944.00 . .J 3 PM6636, E, 66T Modular Power Panel Frame. 66"h x 36"w 732.00 2.196.00 1 PM6642, E, 66T Modular Power Panel Frame. 66"h x 42"w 788.00 788.00 1 PM6648, E, 66T Modular Power Panel Frame. 66"h x 48"w 838.00 838.00 1 PM6660, E, 66T Modular Power Panel Frame. 66"h x 6O"w 949.00 949.00 / !NV ALID FINISHES \ PRELIMINARY DWG Page: 4 7rtE~ CITY OF ANDOVER - FURNITURE PLAN 2110/97 2:50:21 PM I' ..1 Qty Product List Price Unit Extended Panel Type: 66TT 66 HIGH GRADE A - T ACKABLES Inner Outer Frame TR..-? Top Trim Upper 2 Upper I Access Door Base Element PAAI5..-A? PTAI5..-A? AD..-A7? PAA26..-A? PAAI5..-A? PTAI5..-A? AD..-A?? PAA26..-A? 2 PM6648, E, 66TT Modular Power Panel Frame, 66"h x 48"w 841.00 1,682.00 Panel Type: 81A STANDARD Inner Outer Frame Top Trim TR..-E Upper 3 PAAI5..-A? PAAI5..-A? Upper 2 PAAI5..-A? PAAI5..-A? Upper I PAAI5..-A? PAAI5..-A? Access Door AD..-A?E AD..-A?E Base Element PAA26..-A? PAA26..-A? 2 PM8142, E, 81A Modular Power Panel Frame, 81"h x 42"w 897.00 1,794.00 / Panel Type: 81T TACKABLE UPPER I - INNER Inner Outer Frame Top Trim TR..-E Upper 3 PAAI5..-A? PAAI5..-A? Upper 2 PAAI5..-A? PAAI5..-A? Upper I PTAI5..-A? PAAI5..-A? Access Door AD..-A?E AD..-A?E Base Element PAA26..-A? PAA26..-A? 1 PM8142, E, 81T Modular Power Pand Frame, 81"h x 42"w 898.00 898.00 / INVALID FINISHES \ PRELIMINARY OWG Page: 5 . . 7rtE~ CITY OF ANDOVER - FURNITURE PLAN 2110/97 2:50:21 PM jQty Product List Price Unit Extended Panel Type: 81 IT TACKABLE UPPER I -INNER + OUTER hmer Outer Frame TR..-E Top Trim Upper 3 Upper 2 Upper I Access Door Base Element PAAI5..-A? PAAI5..-A? PTAI5..-A? AD..-A?E PAA26..-A? PAAI5..-A? PAAI5..-A? PTAI5..-A? AD..-A?E PAA26..-A? 1 PM8142, E, 81IT Modular Power Panel Frame, 81"b x 42"w 899.00 899.00 13 BFK8T72, A Base Feed, 8-wire isolated ground 221.00 2,873.00 15 BP625 Flush Support Plate 26.00 390.00 8 BSE29, E Side Support Bracket, 29"b 32.00 256.00 j 38 BU100, E Universal Mounting Bracket 20.00 760.00 1 CC4218, E, D Comer Cover Three-Way 180., 42"b 75.00 75.00 3 CC6618, E, A Comer Cover Three-Way 180., 66"h 81.00 243.00 8 CC6690, E, A Comer Cover Two-Way 90., 66"h 65.00 520.00 33 CL29,L,E C-Leg Support, 29"h x 22"d 104.00 3,432.00 26 CL29, R, E C-Leg Support, 29"h x 22"d 104.00 2,704.00 INVALID FINISHES \ PRELIMINARY DWG Page: 6 .' 7rtE~ CITY OF ANDOVER - FURNITURE PLAN 2/10/97 2:50:21 PM List Price , /Qty Product Unit Extended 8 CM29, L, E Intermediate C-Leg Support, 29"h x 22"d 117.00 936.00 2 CM29, R, E Intermediate C-Leg Support, 29"h x 22"d . 117.00 234.00 24 CT22, L, E Handed Cantilever Support, 22"d 33.00 792.00 29 CT22, R, E Handed Cantilever Support, 22"d 33.00 957.00 19 DLS36, E, D1, K Workstation Lateral File Unit with 2 Stacked File Drawers, 27"h x 36"w x 18"d 770.00 14,630.00 10 DP150, E Pencil Drawer, 19"w x 14"d 42.00 420.00 5 DSF1330,E,D4,-A,?,K,- Overl1ead Cabinet, Panel.mounted, 15"h x 30"w x J3"d 474.00 2.370.00 . 16 DSF1336,E,D4,-A,?,K,- Overl1ead Cabinet, Panel-mounted, 15"h x 36"w x J3"d 503.00 8.048.00 9 DSF1342,E,D4,-A,?,K,- Overhead Cabinet, Panel-mounted, 15"h x 42"w x J3"d 565.00 5.08500 12 DSF1348,E,D4,-A,?,K,- Overl1ead Cabinet, Panel-mounted, 15"h x 48"w x J3"d 607.00 7,284.00 17 DSF1360,E,D4,-A,?,K,- Overl1ead Cabinet, Panel.mounted, 15"h x 60"w x J3"d 668.00 11.356.00 25 DS16612, E, D1, K, - Pedestal Storage Unit with Box, Box, File Drawer Configuration, 27"h x 15"w x 22"d 487.00 12,175.00 5 DS030, E Shelf, On-Module mounted, 6"h x 30.w x B"d 109.00 545.00 ) rNVALID FINISHES \ PRELIMINARY DWG Page: 7 .' 7rtE~ CITY OF ANDOVER - FURNITURE PLAN 2/10/97 2:50:21 PM /Qty List Price , Product Unit Extended 11 ED11, A Outlet, Duplex., Circuit I 36.00 396.00 8 ED22, A Outlet, Duplex., Circuit 2 36.00 288.00 6 ED33, A Outlet, Duplex, Circuit 3 36.00 216.00 16 ED55, A Outlet, Duplex., Circuit 5 36.00 576.00 1 EF8T,A Four-Way Connector, 8-wire isolated groWld 74.00 74.00 4 EH8T66, A Panel Pass- Through Harness 66" long, 8.wire isolated groWld 61.00 244.00 26 ES8T66,A Receptacle Harness, 66" long, 8-wire isolated groWld 111.00 2,886.00 " 49 FCA36, E Single Component Vertical Wall Adapters, 36"h (21pkg) 34.00 1,666.00 4 FCA66, E Single Component Vertical Wall Adapters, 66"h (21pkg) 61.00 244.00 1 FCB66, E Double Component Vertical Wall Adapters, 66"h (21pkg) 71.00 71.00 12 FCH360, E Horizontal Wall Adapter, 36"w 45.00 540.00 14 FCH420, E Horizontal Wall Adapter, 42"w 50.00 700.00 8 FCH480, E Horizontal Wall Adapter, 48"w 53.00 424.00 \NV ALID FINISHES \ PRELIMINARY DWG Page: 8 " 7rtE~ CITY OF ANDOVER - FURNITURE PLAN 2/10/97 2:50:21 PM )Qty list Price Product Unit Extended 9 FCH600, E Horizontal Wall Adapter, 60"w 61.00 549.00 1 FF2030, E, 01, K Lateral File Unit with Two Stacked File Drawers, 27"h x 30"w x 18.d 6l7.00 617.00 2 FF2042, E, D1, K Lateral File Unit with Two Stacked File Drawers, 27"h x 42"w x l8"d 687.00 1,374.00 1 FF4036, E, D1, K, - Lateral File Unit with Four Stacked File Drawers, 51"h x 36"w x 18"d 1,008.00 1,008.00 1 FF4042,E,D1,K,- Lateral File Unit with Four Stacked File Drawers, 51"h x 42"w x 18"d 1,060.00 1,060.00 1 FS2130, ED1, K Storage Cabinet with Doors and One Shelf, 27"h x 30"w x 18"d 439.00 439.00 2 FS2136, ED1, K Storage Cabinet with Doors and One Shelf, 27"h x 36"w x 18"d 496.00 992.00 , ) 2 PET 42, E End Trim, 42"h 13.00 26.00 1 PET51, E End Trim, 51 "h 15.00 15.00 20 PET66, E End Trim, 66"h 22.00 440.00 2 PET81, E End Trim, 81"h 28.00 56.00 1 PIT09, E Intermediate Trim, 9"b 4.00 4.00 3 PIT15, E Intermediate Trim, 15"h 7.00 21.00 '~ i !NY ALID FINISHES \ PRELIMINARY DWG Page: 9 7r6~ CITY OF ANDOVER - FURNITURE PLAN 2/10/97 2:50:21 PM , List Price /Qty Product Unit Extended 1 PWA51 , E Wall Adapter, 51 "h 50.00 50.00 11 PWA66, E Wal\ Adapter, 66"h 58.00 638.00 57 TU200,A,E Universal Light, 12"w, Standard Plug 183.00 10,43\.00 2 WC1536, MW, 1, Bl, 8, E Rectangular COImtertop, 36"w x 15"d 127.00 254.00 2 WC1548, MW,1,Bl,8,E Rectangular Countertop, 48"w x 15"d 154.00 308.00 2 WG300 Wire Grommet, 3"dia. 25.00 50.00 13 WPS3624, MW, 1, Bl 900 Comer Worksurface, 36"w x 24"d 24\.00 3,133.00 ) 4 WPS4224, MW, 1, Bl 900 Comer Worksurface, 42"w x 24"d 386.00 1.544.00 8 WPS4230, MW, 1, Bl 900 Comer Worksurface, 42"w x 30"d 386.00 3,088.00 1 WS2430,MW,1,Bl,- Rectangu\ar Worksurface, 30"w x 24"d 127.00 127.00 6 WS2436, MW, 1, Bl, - Rectangular Worksurface, 36"w x 24"d 143.00 858.00 9 WS2442, MW, 1, Bl,- Rectangular Worksurface, 42"w x 24"d 188.00 1,692.00 8 WS2448, MW, 1, Bl, - Rectangular Worksurface, 48"w x 24"d 20\.00 1,608.00 INVALID FINISHES \ PRELlMINAR Y OWG Page: 10 7rLE~ CITY OF ANDOVER - FURNITURE PLAN 2/10/97 2:50:21 PM / List Price , Qty Product Unit Extended 18 VVS2460, MVV, 1,BL,- Rectangular Worksurface, 60"w x 24"d 256.00 4,608.00 4 VVS2472, MVV, 1, BL, - Rectangular Worksurface, n"w x 24"d 297.00 1,188.00 1 VVS2484, MVV, 1, BL, - Rectangular Worksurface, 84"w x 24"d 446.00 446.00 1 VVS2490, MVV, 1, BL, 2 Rectangu1ar Worksurface, 9O"w x 24"d 600.00 600.00 1 VVS2496, MVV, 1,BL,- Rectangular Worksurface. 96"w x 24"d 575.00 575.00 4 VVS3030, MVV, 1, BL,- Rectangu1ar Worksurface. 30"w x 30"d 150.00 600.00 2 VVS3036, MVV, 1, BL, - Rectangular Worksurface, 36"w x 30"d 175.00 350.00 ) - ~ 1 VVS3048, MVV, 1, BL, - Rectangular Worksurface. 48"w x 30"d 254.00 254.00 2 VVS3060, MVV, 1, BL, - Rectangular Worksurface, 60"w x 30"d 293.00 586.00 1 VVS3066, MVV, 1, BL, - Rectangular Worksurface, 66"w x 30"d 356.00 356.00 6 VVS3072, MVV, 1, BL, - Rectangular Worksurface, n"w x 30"d 356.00 2,136.00 1 VVS3096, MVV, 1, BL, - Rectangular Worksurface, 96"w x 30"d 713.00 71300 1 VVSD24, MVV, 1, BL, 1, E D-Top Worksurface, 24"d 483.00 483.00 INVALID FINISHES \ PREL1MINAR Y DWG Page: II 7r tE%l'J:E:i!J CITY OF ANDOVER - FURNITURE PLAN 2110/97 2:50:21 PM List Price /Qty Product Unit Extended 1 WSK4824, MW, 1, BL 90. Comer Worksurface with Cut-Out, 48"w x 24"d 399.00 399.00 1 WSP3060, MW, 1, BL, L, 1, 1 P-Top Worksurface, 6Q"w x 30"d 574.00 574.00 2 WSP3072, MW, 1,BL,L, 1,1 P-Top Worksurface, n"w x 30"d 625.00 1,250.00 1 WSP3084. MW, 1, BL, R, 1, 1 P-Top Worksurface, 84"wx 30"d 695.00 695.00 1 WSP3084, MW, 1, BL, L, 1, 1 P-Top Worksurface, 84"wx 30"d 695.00 695.00 4 WSR3072, MW, 1, BL, 1, 1 Bullet Top Worksurface, n"w x 30"d 478.00 1,912.00 3 WSR3672, MW, 1, BL, 1, E Bullet Top Worksurface, n"w x 36"d 558.00 1,674.00 , 1 WSS3066, MW, 1, BL, L Semi-Suspended Desk., 66"w x 30"d 1,030.00 1,030.00 Subtotal: 183,389.00 Total: $183,389.00 COA\ARCH.DWG JAN97CA T. / INVALID FINISHES \ PRELIMINARY DWG Page: 12 1233 West County Hoad "E" Arden Hills. Minnesota 551 12 (612) 636-2250 Fax: (612) 638.88li8 \1 ,.", E--I>.~RESSQD , , / February 7,1997 Ms. Pat Janssen City of Andover 685 Crosstown Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 Reference: Project 93-30A Systems Proposal Below is our proposal for the total systems layout for your new office/administrative offices. Please see the attached Andover Terrace Specifications for the listing of standards included in this bid proposal. Pricing as shown reflects Grade ill Panel Fabric. Although two accessory items, namely the shelf'fiIes with doors and the small conference table are not depicted in the CADD layout, a line item price has been included in the total project price. All RON product ships in three to four weeks after factory receipt of an order, so we are confident that we can meet your move-in deadline. Given those aggressive lead times, we would also welcome the opportunity to quote on your seating and table requirements. '. I -- ,,# Below is your pricing re-cap: Installation Charges $178,304.00 $76.670.72* $ 1.830.00* $ 175.50 * $ 479.00 * $ 5.900.00 * TOTAL LIST PRICE - SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT: Your net purchase price.......................................... Shelf Files (6 Each) for Offices 113C,113B,113A, l11C,111B,I11A @$305.00/Net Ea Table,42" Diameter W/Pedestal Base (111C) Custom Lock Option - All Locks Keyed Alike/Station TOTAL PROJECT PRICE: $85.055.22/NET INSTALLED ** , / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION / DATE: February 18. 1997 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Administration Richard Fursman ITEM NO.5. 1997 Union Contract REQUEST: The city council is requested to consider the 1997 union contract, which will be put into effect retroactive to January 1, 1997. The proposed contract modifications by the union and administration recommendations are outlined one by one in this memo. 1. Compensation '. .J Union Request: Step increases on January 1, 1997 and each January 1st thereafter. Administration Recommendation: For those who have satisfactory work performance as reflected in year-end reviews, a step increase will be awarded retroactive to January 1, 1997, and then each January 1st thereafter, provided a new contract is ratified. Status: Both parties agree with administration recommendation. Union Request: Five percent (5%) cost of living on January 1, 1997. Administration Recommendation: Wages adjusted 2.9%, reflecting the cost of living increase for 1996. This is the same increase given to non-union employees and approved by the Council in November. Status: Both parties agree with administration recommendation. Union Request: When assigned Lead Supervisory duties, employees shall be paid an additional $1.50/hour. Administration Recommendation: Concur with Union. Union Request: All union employees shall be placed on the same salary schedule as the Mechanics. Administration Recommendation: Employees will maintain their present schedules and not be placed at the same level with the mechanics. Schedules were developed in 1995-96 according to standard pay throughout the metropolitan area. Mechanics are separated by job title, qualifications and duties, and shall remain that way. , / Status: Both parties agree with administration recommendation. 2. Holidays Union Request: One additional floating holiday. .' Administration Recommendation: The floating holiday will remain the same until such time that it is applied universally to all staff in the City. Status: Both parties agree with administration recommendation. Union Request: Holiday pay shall be compensated for the time worked at two (2) times the employee's regular base hourly rate of pay for those hours actually worked on such holiday, in addition to their holiday pay. History: The present union contract allows for one holiday (either Christmas, Easter or Thanksgiving) to be paid at two (2) times the employee's regular rate of pay, in addition to their holiday pay when applicable. All other holidays are paid at a rate of 1 y, times the employee's regular rate of pay, in addition to their holiday pay. Administration Recommendation: If a non-exempt employee is scheduled to work on Christmas, or Thanksgiving, the employee shall be compensated for the time worked at two times the employee's regular base hourly rate of pay for those hours actually worked on such special holiday, in addition to their holiday pay. Additionally, if a non-exempt employee is scheduled to work on Easter, the employee shall be compensated for the time worked at two times the employee's regular base hourly rate of pay for those hours actually worked. Status: Both parties agree with administration recommendation. Union Request: Give employees choice of annual leave or vacation/sick. J History: In 1996 the new personnel policy was adopted by the City. The new policy dropped sick leave and vacation, combining the two into a hybrid 'annual leave' benefit. The annual leave yearly allotment of days begins with 15 days to be used as vacation or sick. The old policy started workers at 10 days vacation, and 12 days of sick. Annual Leave 0-2 years: 3 weeks.................... (15 days) 3-4 years: 3 weeks and 3 days.. (18 days) 5-9 years: 4 weeks ..................(20 days) 10 years: 5 weeks ...................(25 days) Sick/V acation 0-5 years: 2 weeks vac/12 days sick....(22 days) 6-10 years: 3 weeks vac/12 days sick...(27 days) II years: 4 weeks vac/12 days sick.....(32 days) Previously hired staff were given the one-time option of choosing between the two plans. New hires are not given the choice. New hires are covered under the annual leave provision. Administration Recommendation: The council needs to reconsider making the provisions optional. The union had not been given the opportunity to negotiate this change. Status: Same as above. Union Request Aunts and Uncles be added to the funeral leave policy. , , ) Administration Recommendation: Aunts and Uncles will not be added to funeral leave. Funeral leave will remain as is. Status: Both parties agree with administration recommendation. Union Request: Pager Pay. Enhance pager pay from the following: / Present 1 hour pay for regular weekday 1.5 hour regular pay Saturday 1.5 hour regular pay Sunday 1.5 hour regular pay Holidays Proposed 1.5 hours regular pay for weekday 1.5 hour regular pay Saturday 1.5 hour regular pay Sunday 2 hours regular pay holidays 4 hours regular pay for New Years, Independence day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day History: The proposed appears to be consistent with other Cities in the area. (See attachment) Administration Recommendation: Recommend Change. Union Request: Employee shall pay the increase in cost, each year of the contract. Administration Recommendation: Any further contribution to insurance premiums will be negotiated at the time of the next (1998) budget. Status: Both parties agree with administration recommendation J '- J (J u ON CALL PAY , , BARGAINING UNIT PAGE CONTRACT LANGUAGE ANOKA 11,12 1 hour pay for every 8 hours on call duty An employee on standby assignment on a holiday shall be given a compensatory day off. MOUND 8 4 hours pay at 1-1/2 x regular base pay for 24 hour shift 4 hours pay at 2-1/2 x regular base pay for Sunday 4 hours pay at 3-1/2 x regular base pay for Holiday CHAMPLIN 13 2 hours pay for Saturday 2 hours pay for Sunday 4 hours pay for Holiday 1 hour pay for regular weekdays COON RAPIDS 8 1 hour for every 8 hours on-call , NEW BRIGHTON 10 9 hours on-call pay at 1-1/2 x regular base pay , per week L.O , ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION I DATE: February 18 1997 AGENDA SECTION Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. (~~prove Change Order #1/94-30/City Hall Addition Scott Erickson,~l Engineering The City Council is request to approve Change Order #1 for the City Hall improvements. The itemization of the change orders for the various contractors has been submitted by A&P and is attached for your review. Also, attached is a detail of the project cost to date for the project. Craig Kronholm from Adolfson & Peterson will be at the meeting to answer any questions the City Council may have. ; . / FEB-14-9( rid UO: 46 AM RIJULrSON Ptlt~UN I'fl}{ NO. j b lc~c~cj4U P.Uc W]J~L. ':'Toeal Construction Services" " 6701 West 23rd Street Minneapolis. Minnesota 55426 (S12)54~t6S1 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9377 Minneapofis. Minnesota 55440 FAX (612) :;25.23:3:3 FAX (612) 525-2334 ANDOVER CITY HALL BUDGET STATUS AS OF FEBRUARY 13,1997 Contract Budget Bid Awards Soft Costs Estimate $1,300,000 1,146,713 1:53287 1,300,000 Work out~de ofcomract in Bid Awards (Site Work) (59 438) $1,240,562 Change Order 1 31.688 Revised Project Total $1,272,250 . , / - 0' 0 0' 000 u; d 0 III 0 C 2a~ e o~.8 0 0 coo 0 0 ai ~ 0 a.ri d to !?l 9 Ol Ol t; ~ ~. -.: t- ...-- .. ri e ~..u 00 o 0 g g o '"', ,.:: ..... ~~ <:> ""' ~ .~C! zz ~ < o ::I: :J5 (.) <: II. o gg g ag g g g a~~ ti~~~ """"C't .....0>"" ~t#).C"'I .".~~~ ~ o 0 o 0 ~ :e .... 10, N ..... ~ .... g g g cO c:) __ Ln 0 CO ~. :. ::. .... ~ j .... .... ~ .... ~ " w C!) z ! (.) II. o .2 o f a:: " I/') ~ -' ...J <( :I: ~ o cr w > o o z <( III GI Cl "to Qi III ... ... U CI c: .:.:: 0 l .2 ~E 'jij ... ~ .~ Cl III C ... ~ ... C oS! 'u :c <II c:; r5 lJ ~ II: ~ <3 '8 g a E '- c CD :s .! E 4:.. (.) ::J III x: RI ~ .:.:: u o :E ... o ... 't: <> '" o x E II> to. -8 lLt:: "tl 0 Co. c: .c 0 ~ ! ~ 0 ~ ;; ~ c s :8 i J i i i ft ; is- " 5 -:> .. -a ... III 'EjE~ 1II 'ts Cl .0 oE e' ~ .... .. III ~ .. " .s:: 0(,)0 .... ail "0 "i:: o I!! 'lO X. E Q. III g Z 0.. .a - . ;.. .~ ! ~ C N 8 :J .e "0 oS '1: III 4l) o :g 'ii .R-5 0 ~ "0 C "i ... ..2 Q "g :5 III lJ 0.. " 4; :0 E "0 i ~ 'C ~ ~ ; ~. III = .. i ! -. Q '2 .- III ~ .. -e ~ ~ i .Q C Cl II .!!-.&:; D.. 0 =: c;, ~ CD CI j; > Cl ~ 1 1! n. 1II ~ -a f.;l 1: ~ .8 ! "0 "tl ~ ~ ... o 15 lJ ~ (.I o Z ~. 'i .... .t: a.= III :E .11 E '" Co il , g ., .. Vi .. .. II ; fa D .c ~ "ii 0(,)0 ] ... 1:: o ;;; oS! ~ ~ -~ .. 'iii E ~ "iii Cl ~ g e .... "tl ~ ~ Z ~ ., "tl .", II . ... . ! o z z Q Q t- t- g g 0: 0:: t- t- rJ) rJ) z z o 0 ci J: (.) (.) ~ M (.) (.) >-" .1- ~ ~ ~ :5 ~ ~ g o W W ::I 0: ~ ~ :! ~ ~ ~ ~.~. -1.~ ir ti 0::1 ~ ~ ~ s z z z W t- t- t- ~ t- t- 0 0 0 Q 0 (.) (.) (.) (.) (.) 0 0 (/) <: <: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~< < s Q:; tr.o:: 0:: 0:: ct: 0:: :; :i - ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~.~ z z z Oz z'z Z Z ~.~.~ (.) < ~ < < .< g g g o E E Q Q lJ) I/) rJ) ~ a: a: 0::. 0:: CIJ fI} en uJ w UJ uJ uJ 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ g g g ~ ir.ir ir ~ ir z z z z z: z o 0 0 0 0 0 ~~~~~i ;!: ~ z z z z S:S~~~~ g ~~.~ g g (/) 9.! I/) (J) lJ) en ~ -. (/) (/) (/) (/) o 0 0 0 0 0 0:: 0:: II::: 0:: 0:: 0:: o (.) (.) (.) 0 0 ~ z o (/) 4: :E z z. !; :!: g g (/) rJ) (/) CIJ o 0 . a::: 0:: (.) 0 :::: :::: >- >- z z ~ ~ 000 0 (/) en (/) en ~~:i~ ~.~.~ J: g g g M U) rJ) lJ) t- (/) .(/) If) II.. o 0 00 II: a::: 0:: 0 (.) (.) (.) 0: IU .... CI II::: z w <C 0 X 0:: 0 0 ,.. .... .... ... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ... .... ,... .... .- ... ... 0 d d '0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ci 0 ci 0 0 ci 0 ci 0 0 0 z z z .Z z z :z :z :z :z :z :z z :z :z z z :z z , , ~ ~. N .... 0 ~ . m',t 'nt>~?G?G?HH 'mJ ~\j~ NO~1.1.::;rl NOS.flOOI! WI! 917:80 I~.l L6-t>1-83~' 0 :5 6' ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 c 0 111 0 ~ C> 0 0 (;) 0 0 0 0 q 0 a q q '" 0 0 j l- e ri .... oj 0 ttj ('oj cD I'- co C') ci ..j. .... .... ,.; ... .... N N 0 I'- en Q) II:) 0 0 (;) II'l ~ ;!. .... U1 ... ~ I'- '0> ~ ~ 0 ~ ..... ~ ::z :i '" :& ~. ~ -. Cb ~ ~ e r- ~ .... - :;) .... .... .... .... .... .... .,. .r> ~ CO> N' ...... lI't --- 0 :I: ih ~ .... 64 ... ..,. - - :Ie (.) -- ct II.. " 0 . J / ...J ...J .<t :t: ~. U 0:: W > o o z <( w f.!) ~ :t; (.) ~ z o. E e (.) II) oJ C an .... .... E o <> co It:: ". ~.5 ~. g ~ w.....o C ,... II:: o ClI c: <> .! - rr "i "i E :I: ~ = c ..... t!! = Q ,: ::: -0 ~. ~ II.. :!Z -' .5 "0 1IO fl) ~ J!l (II .r= c: .tll 0 ~~ .. !. ... g 1: "E ~ lI.I~:2 i i e1DoO'C.. "0 1Ilc;<c1i.2E~ ~~~"Dg! ] ID .- -2 U " 0 0.._"'-0 .~"o.QQ."O ~ 0 ~ I "i ~ J! "9&..~Dt$1:S ....c;:iQ.-:::s::s ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ zzzzzzzz o 0 0 0 0 0 00 . 1=0 1='.1= Fo F .1= F F ~o 0 0,0'0 0 e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~.~ < ~ z ::z ::z 2 Z Z Z 2 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 20 0 0 0 0 0'0 0 8 ~ ~ ~ ~.~. ~ ~ ~ ~ i2 i2 ii: i2 ii: c: ii: a:: a:: a:: a:: rr a:: a:: 0" W 111 W W 'W W W iiJ :!~:l::r~~~~ a III .... .. .- E III eo · ~ :r:: ell _ 0 ~.~ ;:: .c .. CII ... <> E .!! .g 0 ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ g z z z o Q 0 i= .... F g g g II:: 0:: II:: I- ..... ..... (/) (/) (/) 0 z :z: Z III o 0 0 a:: 0001- o O' 0 (II ~ ~ ~'g 220::6; 0:: o::.a::'~ W W'W en ~ ~ :E ~ 0::- ~ .B .. D ~ 'Z Co .. ftI U C .. " :=. .0. c ::s o o ~ t: .. <C ~ II C') III R ~ e !::: ~ ,g .. .. <> <> 0'11) ~--O' iiga. 'II "i ... c: a ~ t! .! E III .r: o Cl c ~ :B ~ ~ '"" 0 4 >- Cl> '5 ~ .5 e.. E CD .! 0 !2 .D "8~ ~ or 0 C 4D 9 ~ ~ c; ~ u: o..!. CII ; ~ c: Ci Co.ft 0 C 0 · ~ QOO..cns. c: !e! ! .... ;; 9"Ol'!.."E: WJ"O-"'E.; ~1lI'g.~8 ! .2. ~ ::s ... "0 ..,. .., "Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z z g S .t ~ 15 ffi ~ z II) CJ) II) I- I- ~ <t W UJ 'ILI u.J W :z:: x - - - Q. Q.. 0 (,) I!: I!: ~ ... ~ UJ w rnrnv,ZZ :::E~' ::l ~ ~ 0 O. ::l .....% Z aOOCl)(IIct<(l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J: 0:: a:: :; ~ ~ 8 8 ;! 0: a: ~ :::E :! 0( <: > !fJ U) ~ ~ '5 . 0( ILl - CI ~ ~ ~ x II: U 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ _ "tJ oe:: 1l e ~ .c - E .s III ~ B 11 ~ .!! c: l& ~ :;;. - 0 E ; .5 ~ .~ i ; e .5 :. ~. -oo! .. ~ .JIl Q ~ Q. -' ..J '" 4( o Q Z z ;f ~ C,) (,) au ILl ~ ~ Z. ;;t; ~ ~ 0:: 0:: a: ~ rn II) o (.) ~ it: I-- l- S S --I ..J W W ..J ..J ~ ~ n: a:: I- I- m II) ::I ~ C C -~ !;; .si 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci 0 0 0 ci 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z ~_~ bn''! nbPc;7c;71Qj 'mJ j/tl~ Nn~1.l.1rl Nn~~lnat! lJ13 l.v:80 J~.:1 L6-~1-83.:! , / '. -1. '-J <: :I: ~ () .0:: W > o o' z c( / ~ ~ 'tl :! c 0 0 c W 0 0 ~ 0 0 rO lD c 00 .N .- 0> CD .,... '.... "", CO. .... ... It) ... ~ ~ l') (J ... lI.. 0 l0- CI!' (') .- ~ - 0 : .. ..J ! ~ C- O f! to- .co Ii c ~ 0> ... .D '" II> . ::s Co ~ ~ ~ 0> ::s :s co :;? ~ III u ... >- ~ .c II e u } '" C II III ... "V ... .Q ~ '0 I ~ () () 0 a: ~ ~ I- 0 (J. ~ ~ W -' ..J I1J lU W ~ ;;J. ;;t ~ a: ~. Iii l- I- (f) (/) ::J :;) ;:) 0 0 0 Z Z ~ .- ..... ... .... D 0 d d Z Z Z Z to- .~ ~ o ::: :E' ot " w ~ ~ (,) u.. o '2 Q to- '" II: U ~ Q c= e ~ ~ I- Z o (J UJ "" Cl << ~ ~ (J 0 GO',! Ollf-:?G?G?llll on>> XH4 Nn~:jJ:jrl >>OS-nOOH UH Rll: RO HH J6-171-83~- CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER #----1- TO PROJECT NO. 94-30. CITY HALL. WHEREAS, the City of Andover has a contract for Project No. 94-30 with the following: Adolfson & Peterson of Mpls, MN American Structural Metals, Inc. of Hugo, MN Crosstown Masonry of Ham Lake, MN Merrimac Construction of Anoka, MN Roof Tech, Inc. of Stillwater, MN W.L. Hall Company, Inc. of Eden Prairie, MN Mulcahy, Inc. of Oakdale, MN MSA Industries of Eagan, MN Spartan Mechanical, Inc. of Eden Prairie, MN Industrial Electric Company of Mpls, MN NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to hereby approve the change order to Project No. 94-30. MOTION seconded by Council member and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 18th day of February ,19.JIT.., with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk 1 / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION / DATE: February 18 1997 AGENDA SECTION Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Approve Change Order #2/94-30/City Hall Addition I. Scott Erickson~l Engineering The City Council is requested to approve Change Order #2 for the City Hall improvements, Project 94-30. The items requested are as follows: 1. Upgrade the roof repairs to the existing City Hall from sealing the joints to installing a new rubber membrane roof system. The cost of the upgrade is $39,810.00 and would be added as Change Order #2 to our roofing contractor's (Roof Tech, Inc.) contract. 2. The second item is to include exterior building lighting for City Hall. The exterior lighting would be similar to the lighting used to light the exterior of the Oak View Middle School and includes entrance lighting bollards for the main entry into City Hall. The cost for this improvement is $13,768.00 and would be added as Change Order #2 to our electrical contractor's (Industrial Electric Co.) contract. , ) If the City Council wishes to include these items with our existing contracts the funding sources will need to be specified. Craig Kronholm from Adolfson & Peterson will be at the meeting to answer any questions the City Council may have. " , / III ~ 0 Z / ! i:;j '0 U ~ GO'd / '. , / .;.J ...;J <( :c ~. - () c:: w 6 o z <( 8 0 0 0 0 ,;;) ,;;) co co d- N cO to ~ co ~ ~ r- (\I. 1ft m ~ &l ~ ri t/lo ~ i ~ 't; :a .,. ~ !:: ~ 4) f! :::J C .c 0 ~ :I: Do .~ G) '1:11. j c: "C os c 4). = 01 '"' :::J 2' .3 .A dJ ~ 01 i tIl .. :a c .e i (II ; .,:g li c .g -6 '" .g - .. l ~. 0 ... u 0. ; :;,. ~ - ~ ~ ~ tIl Z Z ~ 8 8 8 0 0 0 ~ ii C2 ti b I- 0 0 w w ~ !,; iil -I ILl ILl :r ~ -I ~ ~ ~ ".0: Q: t- ti ti ti IL. 8 :::) :::) :::) 0 0 ~ _It z z N N l'I l'I .... .. ci ci ci ci % Z :i! z z III ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ... o w C) :2 < :z: u ll- e :z o i= D. ii2 o en w Q ll: o 1&1 ... ~ ~ ... !Z o u 'II: ll: W o ~ o OvEG929G191 'ON XV~ - NOSH313d NOS~10aV WV EE:ll I~j L6-v"1-83j , I CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER #.2.... TO PROJECT NO. 94-30. CITY HALL. WHEREAS, the City of Andover has a contract for Project No. 94-30 with Roof Tee. Inc. of Stillwater MN and Industrial Electric Co. of Minneapolis. MN NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to hereby approve the change order to Project No. 94-30. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the J City Council at a regular meeting this ...181h day of February ,19-9I., with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk \. j CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION , / DATE: February 18. 1997 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Administration Richard Fursman ITEM NO. ~ Schedule Joint Council Meeting with City of Ramsey/ April 29 Request: The Council is requested to schedule ajoint meeting with the City of Ramsey for April 29. Andover wishes to discuss issues involving the Rum River and the use offire arms during the hunting season. Anoka may also attend. \ I , / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 18. 1997 AGENDA SECTION fo.O Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM fo.O Rezoning 96-03 R-1 to GR Sections 9 & 16, JeffLeadens i, ct Planning \ V --S i/vll John Hinzman City Planner BY: Request The applicant, Jeff Leadens has requested that this item be tabled until the March 4, 1997 City Council meeting. A copy of his request is attached. " j \ , I MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ) IX' (Ckll'l(' ~ / }/d(! (~ell. ~/L . J ,--J LiiE-{J_t~L Ll~i.-L i ~a~ lLJ~ Ii '7'/ _....,l ' I: '-'tuJ/Lii.a,~ It,' ~ fJ-'!.L,!.u ~17t&-'0' l.JC.u J;~J ~f ;)a~/ J)ca.b;~ . yC.}77 - I&(.,>L/, aUL J ~, ~ /7/a.;_dL/ /1.. .{];Ur 0UAU-i. /y~~- , I 1<>>4 · :;/~ ",/ _ i CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACflON DATE February 18, 1997 AGENDA SECTION fo,[), Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM fo,[), Special Use Permit 96-27 Golf Driving Range & Putting Course Sections 9 & 16, Jeff Leadens ~. /tJ. Planning ~W~ BY: John Hinzman City Planner Request The applicant, Jeff Leadens has requested that this item be tabled until the March 4, 1997 City Council meeting. A copy of his request is attached. , , I ~. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: l ...:::<':...,< /i'..' / /J;' ({itt!"/{. ~. /)/0/ /-' ( !.. &L/L . <, ......J LiUutd J:'/~ i r!a~ 0'~ J..t/;/u.LOA_0 /%./17 V}-Y'~/Ui, ...;{~/r../' -{.fLU fl, f) :l . ~ / /)t .dJdj ~f 1a~.I' JU~ . . 'yq77 .. 1t,;,,<L1r at.../L} ~, ~ //Ja.+-dLJ jlf.. /1. /j . 1 . '. <~ L;uA.~L /~j->' , , 1<-v~, //~ . , CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Februarv 18, 1997 AGENDA SECTION 1\0. Discussion Item, cont. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM 1\0. Amendment Ordinance No. 56, Intoxicating Liquor Sunday Liquor Sales Restrictions /in Planning --:5"\1\).\\/ John Hinzman City Planner BY: I Request This item was tabled at the February 4, 1997 City Council meeting due to the length of the meeting. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACflON DATE Februarv 4. 1997 AGENDA SECTION /10. Non-discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM /10. Amendment Ordinance No. 56, Intoxicating Liquor Sunday Liquor Sales Restrictions Jwt\-- John Hinzman City Planner BY: Planning Request At the January 7,1997 City Council meeting, staffwas directed to research the Sunday liquor licensing policies of surrounding cities as they relate to food sales. Staff has contacted neighboring cities and has drafted an amendment to Ordinance No. 56, Licensing ofIntoxicating Liquor. Following is a summary of community policies and ordinance amendment for your review. '. HAM LAKE: Seating for at least 100 persons per floor must be provided within the establishment. ) ANOKA: Liquor service can begin at 1 0:00am, to accommodate Sunday brunches. Establishments are required to be at least 3,000 square feet in area, and able to seat 150 persons or more. COON RAPIDS: All establishments serving alcohol are required to serve food, but the City has no set food to liquor sales ratios. PL YMOUTH: No additional requirements from State Statutes. INVER GROVE HEIGHTS: No additional requirements from State Statutes. MINNETONKA: All establishments serving alcohol, must derive over 50% of total sales from food as opposed to liquor. Any establishment complying with the above requirement, and the Minnesota clean air act, is eligible to purchase a Sunday liquor license for $200 ( the maximum amount allowed according to Statute 340A.504 Subd. 3; c). MOTION BY: SECOND BY: Regular Andover' Ci ty Council Meeting Minutes - January 7, 1997 Page 11 I AMEND ORDINANCE NO. 28/NON-INTOXICATING LIQUOR; APPROVE SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE/POV'S SPORTS BAR; ACCEPT PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT/IP97- 5/WOODLAND ESTATES; and ACCEPT PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT/IP97- 6/SHADOWBROOK 2ND ADDITION Councilmembe~ Orttel recalled the intent when the liquor licenses were first allowed in the City was that they only be allowed for restaurants that served alcohol, with the majority of the revenue to be from the serving of food. That was to eliminate having bars in the City. Mayor McKelvey thought Pov'S intends to serve food on Sundays starting at 10 a.m., with 35 to 40 percent of the business from the serving of food. Councilmember Orttel thought it was to be at least 50 percent from food. He also assumed the City has never asked for an audit of the receipts from Pov's. Councilmember Dehn stated the ordinance does not deal with that issue. After further discussion, the Council agreed the request before them meets the requirements, but they felt that the ordinance should be revised to impose additional conditions relating to the percentage of revenue being generated from serving food. Staff was asked to research what other cities require. Mr. Carlberg stated they will research other cities and propose a revision to the ordinance for Council consideration. , / Because of th~ Council action in Item 7, Mr. Windschitl had no objection to the Council acting on Items 15 and 16. MOTION by Dehn, Seconded by Ort tel, the Ordinance Amendment 28E as presented, plus Items 14, 15 and 16. (Grant Sunday Liquor License for Pov's Sports Bar; See Resolution R009-97 declaring adequacy of petition and ordering preparation of a feasibility report for utilities in IP97- 5, Woodland Estates; and Resolution ROI0-97 declaring adequacy of petition and ordering preparation of a feasibility report for utilities in IP97-6, Shadowbrook 2nd Addition) Motion carried unanimously. APPROVE HIRING/ACCOUNTANT I / Councilmember Orttel did not recall the Council discussing Shis position as was agreed to in the initial budget meetings. The Council noted the additional staff was discussed at a meeting in Nov~m6e~. ../ ----- Councilmember Orttel was concerned witq/t~hiring practices in the City, specifically that the Council_no-longer interviews the candidates and that residents are not being-.-hired. He wants to be involved in any further hiring in the City--as well as involved wit.h the selection p~oce~s of a~plicant~ to_b~~in~ervi~wed. He really ~elieve~ the Counc~~ ~no~~a b~ dOl~g~ the lnte~v~ewlng 0: ~ew h:r~s and ~na~ prlorlty ~hOULC ;:;e g:,v~:1 ~'::: .~...;'.1:::'C'(I-=~ res:..de::.::s. :v1ayol:" McKe.Lvey as:<ec. :cr 3. ri"lS::lon t.'o 3pprove c~e ~iri~g 0: M~c~e:e We~:1ing for ~he posi~ioc ~f Accou~ta~~ I. I MOrION ;:y =ehn, S-::conded by Kc:.nza, to so move. . , :...:::'"'~ar::.mol.ls.;...i. . Mc:.icn ::ar:!.~i~d , / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA Ordinance No. 56C AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 56, AN ORDINANCE LICENSING AND REGULATING THE LICENSING, SALE AND CONSUMPTION OF INTOXICATION LIQUOR WITHIN THE CITY OF ANDOVER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: Ordinance No. 56 is hereby amended as follows: Section 2, License Required , , / Subdivision 6, Sunday Liquor Sales. On-Sale Sunday Liquor licenses shall be issued only to hotels, clubs, and restaurants which hold an on-sale intoxicating liquor license only in conjunction with the serving of food and which have facilities for serving at least 100 guests at one time, Over fifty (50) percent of an establishment's gross receipts must be derived from the sale of food. subiect to an annual audit of total sales receipts by the City Administrator. or Administrator's designee. For this section. the "sale of food" shall include gross receipts attributable to the sale of food items. soft drinks and nonalcoholic beverages It shall not include any portion of gross receipts attributable to the nonalcoholic components of plain or mixed alcoholic beverages. such as ice. soft-drink mixes or other mixes. The hours of the sale of intoxicating liquor shall be between 10:00 am on Sundays and 1 :00 am on Mondays, An establishment serving intoxicating liquor on Sunday must obtain a Sunday On-Sale Liquor License from the City in the same manner as applications for other licenses to sell intoxicating liquor. All other sections and subsections of this Ordinance shall remain as written and adopted by the Andover City Council. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this lM1 day of February, 1997. CITY OF ANDOVER J.E. McKelvey, Mayor ATTEST: / Victoria Volk, City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION / DATE: February 18. 1997 ITEM NO. Update of Public Meeting/95-24/ . Schedule Special Meeting . /Dl. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Commissions Scott Erickson,l Engineering AGENDA SECTION Reports of.Staff, Committees, The Park and Recreation Commission held a public informational meeting on February 20, 1997, with the residents adjacent to the proposed Coon Creek Trail. Of the 74 properties adjacent to the proposed trail approximately 12-14 of these properties were represented there. The majority of the property owners who showed up for the meeting were either not in favor of the trail or preferred a different alignment of the trail (there were a few present who were in favor as proposed). The Park and Recreation Commission has requested that a joint meeting be set up between the City Council and the Park and Recreation Commission to discuss this project along with the following items: ) 1. Discuss the Coon Creek Trail. 2. Allocate funding source for the Coon Creek Trail. 3. Discuss the section of trail proposed along Bunker Lake Blvd. east of Prairie Road. 4. Discuss trails and sidewalks as they relate to new developments. The neighbors adjacent to the proposed trail will be notified of the meeting. The City Council is requested to hold the meeting with the Park and Recreation Commission on Feb. 27th, 1997, if possible. , ./ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACITON DATE Februarv 18. 1997 AGENDA SECTION r-o. Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM r-o. Comprehensive Plan Task Force Appointments Planning -'5 vlJ~ John Hinzman City Planner BY: _13. Request ) The City Council is asked to appoint ten (10) members to the Comprehensive Plan Task Force Committee. At the January 7, 1997 City Council meeting, staff was directed to advertise for the positions and contact former members of the Committee. Those interested in serving on the Committee were asked to fill out an application indicating their experience, background, and reason for serving. Thirteen applications were sent out, and six were returned. Following is a list of those interested in serving on the committee, a map indicating the area of the city in which they reside, and those applications received as of February 13. Additional applications may be forthcoming, and will be distributed at the meeting. 1997 Comprehensive Plan Task Force Applicants 1. Maynard Ape!, 1781 157th Lane NW 2. Brian Barringer, 2938 1-12ndAvenue NW 3. Lynette Barry, 1.J./36 Xeon Street NW 4. Mike Gamache, 2815 134th Avenue NW 5. Al Grabowski, 1266 1.J6th Lane NW 6. Don Jacobson. 14826 University Avenue NW "7' Jeff Kieffer, 3975 l.f9th Avenue NW 8. Jim Lindahl. 17275 Tulip Street NW 9. Rebecca Pease, 3300 152nd Lane NW 10. Randall Peek, 13405 Uplander Street NW II. Marjorie Perry, 17337 Roanoke Street NW 12. Gretchen Sabel. 35.J0 153rd Avenue NW 13. Byron Westlund. 3318 167th Lane NW ?\umbers correspond to map. Attached applications appear in italics. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: I I' "',l'a !II ::::::; """j , 1 I ' .Ill ! I , i 'il_ l -I' 1 . , j I , I . - ~ r !ll"H'&/i~\), . ~r I ..~ 'Ii I,., ' "'~J. 1.1 '::r J ;/, ~ r . ,. '~I i, ~.: I ';--;. . ,"-" ( I , ~: '1 I ~ I , ~ I .1, ., " () -l -< 0 TJ V " ):> " Z ~ 0 0 < rrl :u I i II :;",~:;,~ '" .; ~ ;' ;' ~ ~ ~ Ij i P n ! i !~! ! I !ll~ N o z - z G) II ,I ,! '! ;p ,I ... Z o ::l .j;'\ ~ \.u) ~ i' -., :1 il. I o 'j ~ ~.~: :u , C;l' ,,~. l.!., .! 1 I 1_.. I I, . ,1~L' _.. '; 1:1\.'::: . I I ! CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULE'.JARD N W . ANDO'JER. MINNESOT'" 5530~ . .612) 755-5100 / COMPREHE~SIVE PLAN TASK FORCE COMMITTEE Name: -:Sf' FF k.; r;. rF e ("' Address: '39" 71J I'll 4f ,.qu ~ Home Phone: Lf1'7 - '1 L.b i Work Phone: f}~ou (? \r 38-3- I V? ~ Please state your reasons for desiring to be on the Comprehensive Plan Task Force Committee: If) ,h-c Cc,;t 1f1.-~L. C /1 'r / c;> A. r 1(.5/ r?f4c. ""l''-~ pI A~ ..-t.-; J T,V'AJ $. Tj.-- ru ct.;,. / Please describe your education/experience which qualifies you to serve on this committee: Y -f-- r Ar... r-;L pA- r ~ (' c~. '11 .... ,",,~ /7 Q . U../ ,-"" h J ~C&tt, (./ -"I (" /..a,- r ~'5' J.-"" i.!;;y... .....__/ 4<:.//,--, I ~/ 1,-4. '- t" ib. \-. $~( 't~ Please describe your professional. civic or community activities which may be relevant to this committee: s..r;" K...,.., ,,c7..; ,'5 r.-'-' C.....- ') 8 ;/V7 c..-c-? ,-J c.t'" rz-'T_ 7 , ' .., ,I' , ,r , ~ , CU ""~ -- f.A <; ~ /" - , / 'I - Ii t:A-) /'L i .4!!/1c-... Dated: ~~ ~'A~ ~tur ~ / CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CP()SSTOWN BOULE\/ARC' ~ W . ANC'C,::R. MINNESC-:-A 5530-1. /612) 755-5100 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN T.-\SK FORCE COMMITTEE Name: 4f Ga-b<77#.sf7 /Vtp f!! ,LA.! Home Phone: /..26>0 1-3 t.f- / t.? -;3 &, Work Phone: :) 7r.(- ~ //u Address: ) hf O,-ov,.JIe $r6-f,;;,'c df'-rn,~'o"'" r<n.Jl:./' f'N -1-'-"-- 67 ~ ..4..A~ Please describe your education/experience which qualifies you to serve on this committeel /7 f-{,-/( i !fee: t!.D_I'4-z/oS5,~,J oJ /~ve.- /r4f~/.t::... .b.~.--. g~~;~J ::;'-rY"tLIt'.;.'c. tl~,c,..,~ .e~~..Jt"",P "/ (' Please describe your professionai, civic or community activities which may be reievam to this committee:. / See:.- ~ j.;:.~ ,-- r ~ /~ 7~ ,es:tk'e,..J 7 Dated: .;t/.;t /e; 7 / r0 p~~/ Signature ( ! / CITY of ANDOVER 1085 Cf'.OSSTOWN BOL!LEJARO~, -..v . A,'JDU/ER. MII\,I\,ESO~A 55304.1612) 755-5100 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TASK FORCE COM~lITTEE Name: (--:::; (e +c ~-'. E_ ,-- : )~\.; -' ~-:~ Address: --;- - (j- ::::>':..J '~-' - .- -..\ '::)~'~ -:.-\\~,~ \ \ \__.~ Home Phone: 4 Z 1 5 ~ Cf ~ Work Phone: ZCf I 7</--+ Please state your reasons for desiring to be on the Comprehensive Plan Task Force Committee: ==-~\:~'.L 'S'-~'I-.;/~\-~(',--r C~~CI..~\_<..~: -,~~ ;,2./"7-'-(~l...' ':;:',.,,,-1::. .......__ ''-;-C.'\ ~-;'l''''''(I..L''-''C. - 1- C~'l\,\ ..11~',~'t" CL-}\\.:...... L.,,-,-;:.\ L~_."--~..\ t ~c.~ \ \... ' \. \ .....l ,'. f"l,~. .~ - ,- 'I ,; '- - ',~ "", -::.. l :..., \ L\ '-: ':~ -:: '. \.. '. ~ I, c._ ~ .... . _ {\. i ,_'I':':" .~ \...:. \_ '_...~.., \_'-<.L l (\. ~0 Please describe your educationlexperience \vhich qualifies you to serve on this~~ . , committee: :..... ;'_CL::"'~ ,:>.( ::.~, ':: -, ' .'"::_~'__ - i'''--". L -: --: ~ ;...._;.~, .:.. '.... -' v _~ \"__ .(__,\\ .}'\\......__ L.. -,\4-. \". \ -".,~..:,--:--\....-~.~~<...,.:-: 7: ~._ ~ ~,"--...\.- ~~'_~-_1.~ .-( ,.... I"";').;"~:. :..... '. ~0".--~~ "--,-"j ':'H'""t"'--\ ~_"--"'I..,:-""" ..-r' --.:.. \"~(\.\"'-.(~\."'-'~~ ""':;"'~"""""'\"- \ . t... ..:. ~~.......~.......;:_r ~"l'~\"'" i.....~ "'.\\"':. (_11-",-T'\1...'c:\, ()\(..,.;\t:': - -\-,~~ ~(:.......-_ (l/l...j-nt-...iE::-. ( D ~,i .-. '1\' '. -;:!, .' (' '."llo;--+' '...... ",- ,. - I'" ... ~ '-\' ,'-\' r.,-_ . ~l C~ ( -n, ~ (J ,k,-, \, \ .:, '-'-- -. . , .~-~ ,- . :-1 ' 'C Piease describe your professionai, civic or community activities which may be reievant to this committee: " " ' ',.", ,.' :'rt . -,'is ? '---./ r I{ . . Y!.-'_ , Signature _.',.. _, c....;,.",'\'>'- _'_ < \ f: !Ui..'-- ? (>..~ i:~'. - _\_1""" t.: Dated: ;- E"_ b 3,IC(C(i :.... _it.. I / CITY of ANDOVER '685 CROSSTOW'I BOULEVARD NW . ANDOvER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (6'2; 755.5100 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TASK FORCE COMMITTEE Name: l.ynnecte M. Barry Address: 14436 leon S tree~ N. W. And.over. MN 55304 Work Phone: 52.5-1149 xZ5 Home Phone: 434-531!l Please state your reasons for desiring to be on the Comprehensive Plan Task Force Committee: Serving on th15 ~ommlttee would enable ~e to better understand the Comprehensive Plan for ~he City of Andover in more depth. It will also @nable me to bG involvGd in anoth9r pro~es~ for establishing policy within the city level of government. Please describe your education/experience which qualifies you to serve on this committee: 15 plus years in the mortgage, real estate industry. During those years with~n th~t ~ndu6try, ex~eU6~ve e~pOBure ~o new conB~ruct~ou, proJec~ development. I have also supervised departments~of 20 plus employees. rtl"""'filntl~.... I am. Fla~11l8 "o.1't'IpO"'oT~P a""d tA""P""....tI..y 1::1"'l lot",... ~pl"'yAAo "1"11 i"'htl mor~gage, banking, real estate areas. Please describe your profc:ssional, civic or community activities which may be relevant to thi:l committee: Have served on the city hall tagk forcQ, planning and zoning commission. and che task force tormed.to address the 1ssue ot "tamllY" .tor occupancy within the residential area of Andover. Always active in iSSues concerning the city, school district, and a6 much as possible the county level issues. Dated: February 3, 1997 , / '. CITY of ANDOVER / 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVAF<D N 'N . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 5530k fllJr755-5100 r\c.vE/VED FEB 041997 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TASK FORCE COMMITTEEC IT Y 0 FAN D n V 1=" c ..... . -I- ,1 Name: t;) ~ ([I tJ , \ \'U C sl"U-i.~ .D 3" ~ Address: '~I, 11..;1 ~'- L/n::'L. ~ \/J 1 r'~ r C. . ,- Home Phone: Q ~- ~ I~''''' Work Phone: Y-2-1-1'Sc-o Please state your reasons for desiring to be on the Comprehensive Plan Task Force Committee: d lL'cuf& .QLL -\c c~u-y. C'l^-p.ct L.V1- (-.o ~'''''' iL~~~ '~b ~ Q.~ I I/,-\,-~jk- ~ ~'- 'l.~~,-~ .~. Please describe your education/experience which qualifies you to serve on this cR~ittee: . . ". . . ,I ~L) 2'Ji: f'-I..A.i.1.''-l..{. ,,0. tc l.v.(..t.~~ ~J 0v\J... }-iLLU U-)~& (;f;M'\.. mtl ~ t~ &vI'\. ttdL"t~~~ q u...iL- 'f.-l...., ...Y-jt~. , Please describe your professional, civic or community activities which may be relevant to this committee: ~. <' i' tL1'-'- ".:l~lv~..(...(.<d,' l.A.-d--1\. t{.V,. ~(.....l(('L..:,",- U~:-c.-<...!.~"",-- If\...{ , {UlW-p'-.... u..'U7'-0 "2) ;-(.... /.0.11"- l<.!u.f (l,u.,,-. () n !iif"",,[l LJ .L u-Q.--x Signatur~ . Dated: .J-AI -1- 7 / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION / DATE: February 18. 1997 ITEM NO. Approve Authorization for Advertisement! Engineering Technicians /II. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Scott Erickson~t Engineering AGENDA SECTION Reports of Staff, Committees, Commissions The City Council is requested to authorize the City Administrator to advertise for the Engineering Technician positions. The two positions that have been budgeted for are an Engineer Tech 4 and an Engineer Tech 4 (Surveyor). Attached is backup information that was previously provided during discussions regarding these positions. The main duty of these individuals is to perform construction inspection on both new development and City initiated improvements. Also, attached for your review is a list of some of the projects the Engineering Department is working on. This list is by no means complete, but it does identify a typical year of activity and some of the additional projects that would be assigned to these individuals. \ .J In addition to providing consistent inspection during construction and assisting with the noted projects these individuals will provide engineering support for new park improvement projects. The Engineering Department does not charge the Park Dedication Funds for the engineering services it provides thus stretching out the limited park funding which is available. Previously outside engineering firms have been hired for various park improvements with their fees being billed to the Park Dedication Fund. The addition of these two positions would provide a maintenance level engineering department for the City. The department will be able to perform some of the engineering and inspection services the City currently contracts for with outside consulting firms. In addition, the department will be able to address many of the issues and projects which are currently backlogged or not able to be addressed at this time. In the last two years the Engineering Department has become self funded and with the addition of inspection staff will continue to do so. The funding for the positions does not come from additional fees applied to projects but is a result of services provided that would have been paid to consulting engineering firms to perform the same tasks. This staffing level is typical of a City the size of Andover and will provide the general engineering services the City requires to continue to maintain our streets and infrastructure at a quality level. '\ J 1997 ENGINEERING PROJECT LIST 1. , / 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Develop, design, and administer the Coon Creek Trail Project. Work with Consulting Engineers to design and develop municipal well #6. Work with Consulting Engineers to design and develop municipal well #7. Work with Consulting Engineers to design and develop water storage facility. Chesterton Commons plat review and project administration. Woodland Estates plat review and project administration. Timber Oaks plat review and project administration. 8. Hunters Hollow project administration. 9. Nightingale Ridge project administration. 10. Timber River Estates plat review and project administration. 11. Commercial Blvd. Extension construction, site clean up and development. / 12. Bunker Lake Blvd. Service Road extension including additional site clean up and development. 13. Andover Blvd. watermain project design and project administration. 14. City Hall Addition coordination with A&P. 15. City Hall parking lot design and project administration. 16. City Hall parking lot lighting. 17. Sunshine park irrigation well evaluation. 18. 1997 sealcoat project design and administration. 19. 1997 crackseal project design and administration. 20. 1997 misc. concrete curb and gutter design and administration. 21. Shadowbrook Phase II plat review and project administration. 22. Shadowbrook Phase I project administration. '\ '. / 23. 1997 overlay project design and administration. 24. Municipal State Aid street reporting and updates. 25. Intersection improvements at Prairie Rd. and Bunker Lake Blvd. 26. Crooked Lake Blvd. reconstruction. / 27. 1997 misc. park trail reconstruction. 28. Parks irrigation system for city hall soccer field. 29. Parking lot lighting for sunshine park. 30. Hamilton Property plat review/street and utility installation. 31. Trunk sewer and water extension to Woodland Estates. 32. Trunk sewer and water extension to Chesterton Commons/Hamilton Property. 33. Park Improvement Projects . Oak Bluff - New Playground (ages 2-5) . Langseths Park - New Playground (ages 2-5) . Pheasant Oaks Park - New Playground (ages 2-5) . Sunshine Park - 2 sets of small soccer goals . Sunshine Park - 3 sets of bleachers for soccer fields . Sunshine Park - 3 concrete pads for bleachers . Pine Hills Park - outfield fencing for 1 baseball field I . Pleasant Oaks - fence along west property line as recommended by Berkley / Risks. . Sunshine Park - outside fencing for 2 ball fields 34. Well #3 maintenance project. 35. Commercial Site Plan Reviews - Bills Superette on Hanson - Bills Superette on Round Lake Blvd - New Businesses on Hamilton Property - New Business in Commercial Park - Child Care facility on Bunker at Hanson - Child Care facility on Bunker at Narcissus - Apt antenna installation 36. Indian Meadows Fourth Addition plat review and project administration. 37. Meadowlark Heights project administration. 38. Rolling Meadows project administration. '\ 39. Compo Water Plan Update with MSA ) 40. Well Head protection plan with Bonestroo 41. Bunker Hills Park and parking lot development. 42. Implement pavement management system (software is purchased) 43. Develop a 5 yr. Capital Improvement Plan for the City. i 44. Strootman Park pond development project. 45. Complete Zone 1 traffic sign updates with public works. 46. Complete Zone 2 traffic sign updates with public works. 47. Update the City Address Map. 48. Update all City Utility Maps. 49. Update the development plan review checklist for engineering. 50. Implement with public works the sign inventory system. 51. Work with consulting engineers/MPCAJEPA on contaminated soil clean up at south Andover site. 52. Review state aid reimbursement for the Round Lake Blvd. project. 53. Review street easement request for Xeon St. in Forest Meadows. ) 54. Represent the City of Andover on the Lower Rum River Watershed. 55. Continue to perform lot by lot grading inspections. 56. Administer tree preservation policy. 57. Perform erosion control inspections. 58. Evaluate a irrigation well for Hawk Ridge park for the park board. 59. Make grant applications, design, and administer the second phase of the KelseylRound Lake park improvements. 60. Attempt to develop a wetland banking program for the City. 61. Resolve drainage issues in the city. (On-going) 62. 1997 pavement striping contract. 63. Investigate the development of a surface water management fund. / 64. Prepare various grant application requests. 65. Assist in evaluating the implementation of right-of-way usage charges for the city. 66. Pursue reimbursement request with the City of Coon Rapids regarding project 93-11. 67. Prepare Council Agenda items. (on-going) ) 68. Respond to citizen requests (on-going) 69. Inspect/administer projects with in-house inspector. 70. Coordinate with County on initiating County improvement projects in the City of Andover. 71. Provide engineering support on 1997 misc. storm sewer maintenance. projects. 72. Process new water and sewer hook up requests and assessments. 73. Provide additional inspection on rural development projects. 74. Provide park coordination with the Park and Recreation Commission and administer the use of the playing fields. (Assistant City Engineer approximately 25% of his time.) 75. Nightingale Preserve storm sewer improvements. 76. Woodland Creek 2nd Addition backyard drainage. 77. Echo Hills 2nd Addition plat review and project administration. / 78. Nightingale Preserve plat review and project administration. This project itemization list is not in any particular order. It does indicate some ofthe projects we are currently working on or are in our back log. .' ,_ J ENGINEERING TECH FUNDING SUMMARY $34,000 X 1.15 = $39,100.00 = $19/HR BILL OUT RATE = $19 X 2.9 = $55.10/HR , ) Example: 1. Bill Out 1/2 the time 1040 hr x $55.1/hr = $57,304.00 2. Bill out full time 2080 x $55.10.hr = $114,600.00 3. Minimum bill out 710 hr (4mo) x 55.1/hr = $39,121.00 . , / / PrimarY 1. Construction Inspection - Urban Developments 2. Construction Inspection - Rural developments 3. Construction Inspection - City Projects . Overlays . Reconstructs . Park Improvements . Sealcoat . Crackseal . Miscellaneous Concrete Curb & Gutter . Capital Improvements . Other '-, ) 4. Primarily responsible for implementation of Pavement Management System. 5. Project Design/Drafting (CAD) 6. Assist on maintaining Municipal State Aid System. . Needs Assessments . Project Management . Etc. 7. Assist in Grant Writing 8. Easement Writing Other 1. Provide Engineering assistance for City Public Works projects. 2. Provide inspection support for Park Capital Improvements. 3. Assist on implementation of a utility information system. 4. Respond to citizen, City Council and developer requests. 5. Other duties as assigned. -' CITY OF ANDOVER 9/9/962:47 PMSTANTON.XLS 1997 STEP PROGRAM 1997 BUDGET PROCESS j ENGINEERING TECH 4 - (312 POINTS) I DESCRIPTION: . Senior or lead position including complex duties involving directing, coordinating and participating in the most difficult non-professional engineering work requiring extensive 1 specialized knowledge and experience. Must use level and transit, establish and I compute grades and handle inspection assignments on projects. Can also include j Lead responsibilities on projects. I , ! MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: ! Completion of an approved technical training program or technical education equivalent of 2 years vocational school or college in highway construction or civil engineering at least 5 - 6 years experience or equivalent. , , '- / * Hire 31,995 Six Month 33,210 1 Years 34,425 2 Years 35,640 3 Years 36,855 4 Years 38,070 5 Years 39.285 6 Years 40,500 .' .1 / Primarv 1. Construction staking for new development and City construction projects 2. Project Design/Drafting 3. Inspection - New development and City construction projects 4. Inspection - Rural Development , \.. / 5. Maintain City Maps . As Builts . City Street Map . City Address Map . Water, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer Maps 6. Maintain City Bench Mark Book 7. Assist in Pavement Management System 8. Assist in Grant Writing Other 1. Provide design and survey support for Park Capital Improvements. 2. Provide Engineering assistance for City Public Works projects. 3. Implement and maintain storm sewer ponding dictionary. 4. Respond to citizen, City Council and developer requests. 5. Assist on implementing a utility information system. 6. Other duties as assigned. , J ~,,~ .~~ ~,. ~. ~-.-- ~7,7,:7 ,7\~~7Ti[f:~'.'~;0t'~tI~?:1:~}~:::~r~J?;~e , -~..'- ~.',:-- .., -i. .... 9/9/962:47 PMSTANTON.xd~ <". J SENIOR ENGINEERING TECH 4/SURVEYOR - (312 POINTS) L DESCRIPTION: . . i . First level supervision over Engineering Aides and technicians, but not professional : engineers. Assigns, supervises and directs the work of Aides and Technicians in the J department. Plans and supervises project work overall, but may delegate some project elements to a Senior or Lead Technician. Evaluates progress on projects and redirects efforts, if required. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Technical education equivalent to 2 years vocational school or college plus at least 5 years practical experience in technical engineering support work and ability to supervise. " * Hire 33,970 Six Month 35,260 1 Years 36,550 2 Years 37,840 3 Years 39,130 4 Years 40,420 5 Years 41,710 6 Years 43,000 .' : CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \ DATE: February 18 1997 ITEM NO. ."inoka County Highway Dept. Traffic Study Results F.i$. IS. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Scott Erickson, ~~ Engineering AGENDA SECTION Reports of Staff, Committees, Commissions Attached is a copy of the 1996 warranted signal list provided by the Anoka County Highway Department. The intersections of Hanson Blvd.lCrosstown Blvd. and Hanson Blvd/Andover Blvd. were previously discussed with the County and identified as a high priority for the City. These two intersections not only require signalization but will also need to be reconfigured with additional turn lanes. The other identified intersections would warrant signalization only. A priority listing will need to be made by the City Council to forward to the County Board. A suggested priority listing is as follows (if the Council does not desire to recommend signalization for any of the intersections at this time that should also be noted): The intersection of Crosstown Blvd. (CSAH 18) @ 133rd Ave. NW was identified as a warranted signal from the 1995 study and was recommended for installation last year and is , , planned to be installed this year. 1. Hanson Blvd. (CSAH 78) @ Crosstown Blvd. (CR 18) 2. Andover Blvd. (CSAH 16) @ Hanson Blvd. (CSAH 78) 3. Hanson Blvd. (CSAH 78) @ 133rd Ave. NW (Compost Site Road) * 4. Round Lake Blvd. (CSAH 9) @ 157th Ave. NW (CSAH 20) * 5. 7th Ave. (CSAH 7) @ 157th Ave. NW (CSAH 20) * * indicates signalization only If the City Council would like to request additional intersections to be evaluated, we can forward that information to the County. Staff will request a traffic study be performed at the intersections of Prairie Road, Andover Boulevard and Crosstown Boulevard/139th Ave. NW. / r , / COUNTY OF ANOKA Public Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 (612) 754-3520 FAX (612) 754-3532 January 10, 1997 ~, ~--, .'--- " ~- ~ Scott Erickson City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd NW Andover, MN 55304 1/1 ',' .' ~ 1-": 1 S i . ,i ~/.. t.... , '/ :... .__ i'".>, ,;,,:: RE: Traffic Studies in Andover Dear Scott: Enclosed is a copy of the ADT (Average Daily Traffic) Map of Anoka County, a list of 1996 warranted signal locations, and copies of the Manual Traffic Counts completed in 1996 within the City of Andover. Results of the Traffic Studies are summarized as . '\ follows: " ) Location Date Results CSAH 7 (7th Ave) @ CR 58 (Valley Dr) CSAH 116 (Bunker Lake Blvd) @ Prairie Rd CSAH 116 (Bunker Lake Blvd) @ Crooked Lake Blvd CSAH 9 (Round Lake Blvd) @ 143Rd Ave NW CSAH 78 (Hanson Blvd) @ 133Rd Ave/Compost Site Rd 7/16/96 7/22/96 6/17/96 8/13/96 7/28/96 No Warrants Met No Warrants Met No Warrants Met No Warrants Met Peak Hour Signal Warrant Met Of the intersections counted without existing traffic signals, one location, CSAH 78 (Hanson Blvd) @ 133Rd Ave/Compost Site Rd warrants signalization. This location has been added to our list of warranted signal locations. The Anoka County Publics Works Committee will soon be prioritizing these locations along with other warranted signal locations on the County Highway System, to determine which signals will be designed and let as construction projects in 1997. " ) Please contact Jane Pemble, Traffic Engineer, to discuss the results of these traffic studies, and your views on the City of Andover signal priorities. We anticipate that our '97 design/construction schedule will be decided by early February, and we would appreciate your input prior to February 5, 1997. In addition, let me know the locations within the City of Andover that you would like Traffic Studies conducted during 1997. Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer ,'" . , J / / ;Z~~ Randy Bettinger Traffic Engineering Technician rlb/ad96sig ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1996 WARRANTED SIGNAL LOCATIONS / A CSAH 9 (Round Lake Blvd) @ CSAH 20 (157th Ave) B CSAH 23 (Lake Drive/I-35W Ramps) @ CR 105 (Naples St) C CSAH 51 (University Ave) @ Four Seasons Mobile Home Park Ent. D CSAH 17 (Lexington Ave) @ I-35W South Ramp E CSAH 7 (7th Ave) @PostOffice Exit/Van Buren St. F CSAH 10 (Birch St) @ CSAH 49 (Hodgson Road) G CSAH 35 (Old Central) @ TH 10 H CSAH 78 (Hanson Blvd) @ 129th Lane NW I CSAH 7 (7th Ave) @CSAH20 (157th Ave) J TH 288 (7th Ave) @ CR 79 (North ST) K CSAH 7 (7th Ave) @ Bob Ehlen Dr./Tyler St. v[L .. CSAH 78 (Hanson Blvd) @CSAH 16 (~_dov~!..!3J~91 1\1:--- C:RT(r(89tli Aver@-polKSt---~ N CSAH 1 (Coon Rapids Blvd) @ Ibis St (L.a. Jacobs School) o CSAH 17 (Lexington Ave) @ CSAH 10 (North Road) ./ P CSAH 78 (Hanson Blvd) @ CR 18 (Crosstown Blvd) J .' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACTION DATE: February 18. 1997 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT HRA Meeting Planning J:L ITEM NO. Appoint HRA Officers /J. David L. Carlberg Community Development Director The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is asked to appoint the officers of the HRA. The officers were last appointed on March 19, 1996. The officers appointed at that time are as follows: Chairman - Jack McKelvey Vice-Chair - Don Jacobson Sec./Treas. - Bonnie Dehn The support staff are as follows: Treasurer - Shirley Clinton Secretary - Marcie Peach The HRA will need to appoint a replacement to fill Mr. Jacobson's position. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION , / DATE February 18.1997 AGENDA SECTION Non-discussion ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Finance ~'-J-0' Jean D. McGann lITEM NO. &. 17. Reduce Letter of Credit - Hills of Bunker Lake~ 5th Addition REOUEST: The Andover City Council is requested to approve the reduction ofletter of credit # 13-94 in favor of the City of Andover provided by Northeast State Bank on behalf of Hills, Inc.. This letter of credit is in the amount of $226,000.00 and should be reduced to $77,872.95 as this is the remaining amount of special assessments on J this project. BACKGROUND: On June IS, 1994, Hills, Inc. submitted a letter of credit to the City of Andover. This transaction transpired due to the development contract. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 18. 1997 AGENDA SECTION Non-discussion ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Finance Jean D. McGa.rnRJ-r<> lITEM NO. 18. Reduce Letter of Credit - Echo Woods REOUEST: The Andover City Council is requested to approve the reduction of letter of credit # 1 0-93 in favor of the City of Andover provided by Northeast State Bank on behalf of Hills, Inc.. As of January 2, 1996 this letter of credit has a balance of$51,562.45 and should be reduced to $24,909.42 as this is the remaining amount of special assessments on this project. " , / BACKGROUND: On April 28, 1993, Hills, Inc. submitted a letter of credit to the City of Andover. This transaction transpired due to the development contract. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION , , ; , DATE: February 18 1997 AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Appoint Park & Recreation Commission Member Iq, Todd J. Haas, / Park Coordinator The City Council is requested to appoint Brian Barringer to serve on the Park and Recreation Commission. Brian's term will expire December 31, 1998. He will serve the remaining term vacated by Roger Paulson. / .' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION February 18. 1997 DATE AGENDA ~CTlnN N on-'U1SCUs:lltm t--O. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ( /)/ Planning JJ \A Jeff Johnson v1 ~L ' I I BY: ITEM t--O. Adopt Ordinance No. 4A (To Repeal Ordinance No.4) dO, REQUEST The City Council is asked to adopt Ordinance 4A. Ordinance No 200 - An Ordinance Regulating the Moving of Buildings Over Public Rights-of-Ways and the Placement of Such Buildings on Parcels of Land in the City of Andover will replace this ordinance. ) / MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 4A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.4 ADOPTED THE 3RD DA Y OF DECEMBER, 1968, KNOWN AS AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE MOVING OF BUILDINGS OVER STREETS AND ALLEYS IN THE TOWNSHIP AND PROVIDING FOR PROTECTION TO THE TOWNSHIP FROM DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF SUCH OPERATIONS. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: Ordinance No.4 is hereby amended as follows: Ordinance No.4 adopted December 3,1968 is hereby repealed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this _ day of 1997. .' ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER Victoria V olk, City Clerk J.E. McKelvey, Mayor ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL AcrION February 18. 1997 DATE AGENDA Non1ffigf~n 1'00. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM 1'00. Adopt Ordinance No. 200 Moving of Buildings Over Public Rights-of- Ways.... Planning Jeff Johnson BY: " (. REQUEST The City Council is asked to review and adopt Ordinance No 200 - An Ordinance Regulating the Moving of Buildings Over Public Rights-of-Ways and the Placement of Such Buildings on Parcels of Land in the City of Andover. Please advise staff in regards to any recommended or proposed changes. / . ./ MOTION BY: SECOND BY: . ) CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 200 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE MOVING OF BUILDINGS OVER PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WA YS AND THE PLACEMENT OF SUCH BUILDINGS ON PARCELS OF LAND IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER. The City Council of the City of Andover does hereby ordain: Section 1 PUI:pose and Objectives: The purposes and objectives of this ordinance are to provide for protection of damages that result from the moving of buildings over public road right-of-ways and to minimize the adverse impact on surrounding properties after a building has been moved to such property. Section 2. Definitions: '. / Accessory Building - a structure or a portion of a structure subordinate to and serving the principal use or structure on the same lot and customarily incidental thereto. Building Mover - a person, corporation, or other entity who raises, supports off the foundation, and moves buildings on and over public streets and highways. Building - any structure having a roof (roof area to exceed 120 square feet) which may provide shelter or enclosure of persons, animals or chattel. Dwelling Unit - a residential building or portion thereof which is used exclusively for human habitation but not including hotels or motels. Road Authority - the commissioner, as to trunk highways; the county board. as to county state-aid highways and county highways; the town board, as to town roads; and the governing bodies of cities when the governing bodies or city streets are specifically mentioned, Section 3. Required Permits and Regulations: The follO\ving pertain to information that is required by the City from the building mover: 1. No person may operate as a building moyer in the City unless licensed by the State as a "building 1110\er", , / 2. If a building or dwelling unit is to be placed on a parcel of land in the City. the building mover will be required to obtain a building permit before the building or dwelling unit is moved across any public street and/or highway. 3. The building mover shall provide the City the following: a. Information in regards to the date and time the building will be moved over public streets and/or highways. b. A map showing a list of designated streets over which the building shall be moved to assure safety to persons and property in the City and to minimize congestion and hazards on public streets. The Building Official may refuse to issue a permit if: a. The building is too large to move and may endanger property or person(s) in the City. b. The building is in such a state of deterioration or disrepair or is otherwise structurally unsafe that it could not be moved without endangering property or person(s) in the City. c. The building mover's equipment is unsafe. d. Any other life/safety reasons as determined by the Building Official. 3. The dwelling unit along with all other accessory buildings (attached or detached) shall be removed from the residential parcel of land in the City if the dwelling unit is moved to another parcel ofland, unless the City receives in writing from the property owner that a dwelling unit will be constructed or placed on that parcel within one (I) year from the date the building permit was issued to move the dwelling unit from that parcel. All rubbish and materials shall be removed from the building or dwelling unit removal site and all excavations to existing grade shall be completed. The premises shall be left in a safe and sanitary condition. 4. The building mover shall notify the Building Official of any and all damages done to property that may result in the moving a building within twenty-four (24) hours after such damage has occurred. The building mover shall be liable for any damages and expenses incurred. , ./ The following pertain to information that is required by City from the ownerls) of the J buildinl,; or dwellinl,; unit to be moved: 1. A special use permit is required prior to any dwelling unit to be moved on a residential zoned lot in the City. The dwelling unit shall meet the minimum requirements for floor area per dwelling unit as stated in the Zoning Ordinance. The special use permit will be reviewed by the governing bodies of the City to determine if the building is compatible with other development in the area and will not depreciate surrounding property values. 2. The owner of said moved dwelling unit shall submit along with the special use permit, photographs taken from two (2) or more angles of the dwelling unit to be moved and photographs of the lot on which the dwelling unit is to be located. Photographs of all dwelling units and lots abutting lot where dwelling unit is to be located shall also be submitted. 3. The owner of said moved building or dwelling unit will have one hundred and eighty days (180) from the date the permit was issued to move the building or dwelling unit to the desired location and comply with all applicable City ordinances, the Uniform Building Code and State laws that involve the moving of buildings or dwelling units over public right-of- ways and the placement of such buildings or dwelling units on parcels of land in the City. Section 4. Penalties. Any person who violates any provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to applicable fines and imprisonment defined by State law. In addition to the penalties imposed by this ordinance, the City may exercise. with or separately from such penalties, all and any other legal and equitable remedies then available to the City by this ordinance, or by statute, or by other ordinances of the City, or by applicable rules or regulations. to enforce this ordinance. including, without limitation. injunction. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this _ day of 1997. ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER , / Victoria Volk. City Clerk J. E. \1cKc!\'cy_ \layor CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE Januarv 28.1997 AGENDA ITEM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT~ APPROVED FOR AGENDA 7. Discussion: Ordinance No. 200 - Regulating the Moving of Buildings... Jeff Johnson Zoning Administrator BY: BY: The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review Ordinance No. 200 - An Ordinance Regulating the Moving of Buildings Over Public Rights-of Ways and the Placement on Parcels of Land. Ordinance No.4 will be repealed. For more information, please refer to the attached minutes from the November 12, 1996 and January 14, 1997 Planning and Zoning Commission meetings. . I I I I I I I ., ~ , / TOWNSHIP OF GROW COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA Ordinance No. 4 REGULATING THE MOVING OF BUILDINGS OVER STREETS AND ALLEYS IN THE TOWNSHIP AND PROVIDING FOR PROTECTION TO THE TOWNSHIP FROM DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF SUCH OPERATIONS. SECTION I. Definitions. 1.01 For the purpose of this Ordinance, the following terms, phrases, words and their derivations shall have the meaning given herein. A. "Building" is a structure designed, built or occupied as a shelter or roofed enclosure for persons, animals or property and used for residential, business, mercantile, storage, commercial, industrial or recreational purposes. A structure of less than one hundred (100 s.f.) square feet floor area shall not fall within this definition. B. "Building Inspector" is the Building Inspector of the Township of Grow. C. "Township" is the Township of Grow. / D. "Person" is any person, firm, partnership, association, corporation, company or organization of any kind. SECTION II. Permit Required. , ' 2.01 No person shall move any building over, along or highway, street or alley in the Township without first a permit from the Building Inspector. across any obtaining SECTION III. Application. 3.01 A person seeking issuance of a permit hereunder shall file an application for such permit with the Building Inspector. A. Form. The application shall be made in writing, upon forms provided by the Building Inspector, and shall be filed in the office of the Building Inspector and shall contain such information as the Building Inspector shall find necessary to a determination of whether a permit should be issued. B. Accompanying Papers. (1) Tax Certificate. The owner of the building to be moved shall file ~ith the application sufficient evidence that all real estate taxes a~d special assessments against the building and lot from ~hioh it is to be moved are paid in full. / Page 2 / (2) Certificate of Ownership or Entitlement. The applicant, if other than the owner, shall file with the application sufficient written evidence that he is entitled to move the building. (3) Consent of Public utility Company. The applicant shall file with the application prior to issuance of permit, written evidence of arrangements with all public utility companies whose wires, lamps or poles are required to be removed, for the removal thereof by the company. C. Fee. The application shall be accompanied by a permit~ determined according to the following schedule: / Square Footage of Building Up to 350 square feet 351 square feet to 600 square feet 601 square feet to 824 square feet 825 square feet and over SECTION IV. Security Requirements. 4.01 Cash De~osit. Application hereunder shall be accompanied by a cash depos~t ~n the sum of five hundred ($500.00) dollars as an indemnity for any damage which the Township may sustain be reason of damage or injury to any highway, street, or alley, sidewalk, fire hydrant or other property of the Township, which may be caused by or be incidental to the removal of any building over, along or across any street in the Township, and for any expense incurred by the Township under subdivision 7.02 of Section 7. Amount $ 15.00 25.00 50.00 75.00 4.02 Bond. Any person filling an application hereunder shall file w~ the Township Clerk a bond, approved as to form by the Township Attorney, executed by a corporate surety company authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota in the amount of five thousand ($5,000.00) dollars conditioned upon the compliance by the applicant with this and other applicable ordinances and laws, and payments to the Township of all fees, fines and penalties required by said ordinances. 4.03 Insurance. Any person filing an application shall also file w~th the Township Clerk a liability insurance policy or certificate of such insurance, issued by an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota, and approved as to form by the Township Attorney. The policy shall insure the applicant, and the Township as an insured, in the sum of at least $100,000 for injury to one (1) person, and $300,000 for one (1) accident, and at least $25,000 property damage, and the policy shall be kept in effect until after the building has been moved. SECTION V. Duties of the Building Inspector. , I 5.01 Inspection. The Building Inspector shall insgec~ the building and cne applicanc's equipment to determine wnecner che following standards for issuance of a permit are met. Page 3 5.02 Standards for Issuance. The Building Inspector shall refuse to lssue a permit if he finds: / A. That deposit ban with; any application requirement or any fee or or insurance requirement has not been complied B. That the building is too large to move without endangering person or property in the Township; C. That the building is in such a deterioration or disrepair or is otherwise so unsafe that it could not be moved without persons and property in the Township; state of structurally endangering D. for the That the building is structurally unsafe the purpose for which moved, if the location building is to be moved is in the Township; or unfit to which E. That the applicant's equipment is unsafe and that persons and property would be endangered by its use; F. That zoning, building code or other ordinances would be violated by the building in its new location; G. That for any other reason Township would be endangered building. persons or property in the by the moving of the J 5.03 Fees and Deposits. A. Return Upon Non-Issuance. Upon his refusal to issue a permit, the Building Inspector shall direct the Township Clerk to return to the applicant all deposits, bonds and insurance policies. Permit fees filed with the application shall not be returned. B. Allowance for Ex ense. After the .building as een remove, t e BUl lng Inspector shall furnish the Township Clerk with a written statement of all expenses incurred and of all damage caused or inflicted upon property belonging to the Township by reason for the removal. The Township Clerk shall return to the applicant all deposits after deducting a sum sufficient to pay for all the costs and expenses and for all damage done to property of the Township. Permit fees deposited with the application shall not be returned. 5.04 Designate Streets for Removal. The Building Inspector shall procure from the Townshlp Councilor its designated representatives a list of designated streets over which the building shall be moved. The Building Inspector shall reproduce the list upon the permit in writing. Determination as to designated streets shall be made to assure maxi~um safetv to persons and property in the Township and to ~inimize congestion and hazards on public streets. I Page 4 , / 5.05 Tests by Township Engineer. In those cases in which the Building Inspector 1S doubt:ul about soil conditions or water tables, he is hereby authorized and instructed to arrange for tests by the Township Engineer and any cost thereof shall be born by the property owner. SECTION VI. DUTIES OF PERMITTEE. 6.01 Every permittee under this Ordinance shall: A. Use Designated Streets. Move a building only over streets des1gnated for such use in the written permit. B. Notify Inspector in and hours as of Revised Moving Time. Notify writ1ng of a desired change in proposed in the application. the Building moving date C. Notify of Damage. Notify the Building Inspector in writing of any and all damages done to property belonging to the Township or any public utility within twenty-four (24) hours after damage or injury has occurred. J D. Displar Lights. Cause red lights to be displayed during the n1ght time on every side of the building, while standing on a street, in such manner as to warn the public of the obstruction, and shall at all times erect and maintain barricades across the streets in such manner as to protect the public from damage or injury by reason of the removal of the building. Warning lights with open flame shall not be used. E. Street Occupancy Period. the Township streets after two unless an extension is granted Remove the building from (2) days of such occupancy, by the Township Clerk. F. Comply with Governing Law. Comply with the Building Code, and Zoning Ordinance and other applicable ordinances and laws upon relocating the building in the Township. G. Pay Expenses of Officer. Pay the expense of a traffic officer ordered by the Township Clerk to accompany the movement of the building to protect the public from injury. H. Clear Old Premises. Remove all rubbish and materials and fill all excavations to existing grade at the original building site if within the Township so that the premises are left in a safe and sanitary condition. I. Remove Service Connection. The Permittee shall notify gas and electr1c serV1ce companies to remove their services from the premises and shall remove and disconnect all othe" utility connections. In the event that the property is served by sanitary sewer, the Pe"mittee shall plug the sewer line with a concrete stopper. , / J. Comoletion of Remodelin~. Complete promptly, and within ninety (90) days atter removal, all remodeling, ?age 5 additions or repairs as shown on the plans accompanying the application. / SECTION VII. Liability of Permittee to Township. 7.01 Permittee Liable for Expense Above Deposi~. The permittee shall be llable for any expenses, damages or costs in excess of deposited amounts or securities. 7.02 Original Premises Left Unsafe. If the original building site is wlthin the Township, the Township shall proceed to do the work necessary to leaving the original premises' in a safe and sanitary condition, where Permittee does not comply with the requirements of this ordinance, and the cost thereof shall be charged against the cash deposit. SECTION VIII. Penalty. 8.01 Any person, firm or corporation violating this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a $100.00 fine or ninety (90) days imprisonment. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect after its passage and publication. Adopted by the Township Council this 3rd day of December, 1968. ) /s/ Louis Appleby Louis Appleby, Chairman J :.:; ,,- '.](;:' '/{ i \x~lL;'{'-.. i'!;';-, j~. . ;~ .,' ; 1- ;-<' ~ v.![nlfl lL"n \ia:') :nt're;J(tc;, ...,i.:rH ,~~. mJ.li i)~, thl" :-';~t:I:tJtr tu the Jdl'nJant J.t tht.: J~f~';-: dant's last known address and the plellntd!'> alliclavll ,,(compliance with the provision, of this section and sections 221.60. 221.65. and 22 I .63 is attached to the summons. History: 1963 c 399 s 7: 1981) c 5./1 s 3: 3Sl' 1 ')81 L' :: art 1 s 30: 1985 c ::99 s ::9: 198,., l' 44./: /OS-: L" '+1)-4 s 15-: !I;,:)() (' 335 .Ir[ f .. f\'~ 221.68 vrOL\TIOl'S: PE-"'ALTIES. Any person who violates or procures. aids. or abets violation of. or fails to compi'. with. the provislOns of Laws 1935. chapter 290. sections 2"' to 29 or any valid order or rule of the commissioner or board issued hereunder shall be guilty of a misdemean- or: and. additionally, shall be subject to a penalty of$50 for each and every day of such failure to so comply. to be recovered for the state in a civil action. Each distinct viola- tion shall be a separate offense. History: 1963 c 399 s 8: 1971 c::5 s 67: 19-6 c 1665110: 1980 c 534 s 85: 1985 " ::99 s 30 :\IISCELL\NEOt:S 221.71 COM:\It:TER VA;\;S; DRIVER LIABILITY. Subdivision I. Employment relationship. ;\;otwithstanding any other law to the contrary. the services performed by a driver of a commuter van shall be deemed to be those of an independent contractor and not those of an employee acting within the scope of employment. unless provided in writing to the contrary. Subd. 2. Standard of care. .-\ driver or owner of a commuter van shall not be held to the standard of care applicable to dnvers or owners of common carners. nor shall they be subject to ordinances or rules which relate exclusively to the regulation of driv- ers or owners of automobiles for hire or other common carriers or public transit carri- ers. History: 1976 c ::33 s 10: 1985 c 148 s 70: 1986 c 444 221.81 BUILDI;\;G :\IOVERS. Subdivision I. Definitions. For the purposes of this section. the terms used in this section have the meanings given them in this subdivision. (a) "Building mover" means a person. corporation. or other entity who raises. sup- ports off the foundation. and moves buildings on and over public streets and highways. Building mover does not include a person who moves manufactured homes or modular homes. farmers moving their own farm buildings. or persons moving buildings which are less than 16 feet wide by 20 feet long. (b) ~Political subdivision" means a city, town. or county. (c) "Road authority" has the meaning given it in section 160.02. subdivision 9. Subd. 2. License. :-10 person may operate as a building mover in this state unless licensed by the commissioner. The commissioner may inspect a building mover's vehi- cles or records to determine compliance with this section. Subd. 3. License application. To obtain a license to operate as a building mover an applicant shall file an application with the commissioner specifying the name and address of its officers and other information as the commissioner may reasonably require. The commissioner shall issue the license upon compliance by the applicant with insurance requirements and payment of an initial S 150 filing fee. .-\ license once granted continues in full force and effect. subject to a $ 100 annual renewal fee and com- pliance with insurance requirements. unless revoked or suspended. The commissioner. upon approval of a license for a building mover. shall issue a sufficient number of cab cards to each licensed mover to provide one cab card for each power unit used in moving buildings. The fee is S I 0 for each cab card issued. The cab card must be carried at all times in a readily available place in the cab of the power unit -. '.--;~-".~.:;._~,:- ~ <~~;,I':7.;'r\~r::'-~.~::",=->.'~"'<-;:,~_!~,,,,_-~~ ~~-"r'~-"l'....- 'l~ :\-IOTOR C-\RRlERS; PlPELl:\E C\H:H:IFHS ::::UII '-I; :0 t~e defendant at the deren- C1iTl:- 'ce with the provisions IS a . ned to the summons. rl 1 s 3U,' 1985 c 299 s 29; I<J86 for which it was issued. The building mover may also purchase up to live !loater cab ords for a fee of 5100 (or e:lch nO:lt':r (:lrd issued. Cab cards Jre e1fcctive f,)r a 12. month penod :lnd continue from ~e:lr to ye:lr thereafter upon payment of the requircd i'ce. C:lb (;lrds are onl\ good t~Jr the penoJ for whIch the license IS etfecti\e. Subd. 3a. Insurance. Each building mover shall have in etfect the following: (al comprehenSIve general II:lbility insurance including completed operatIons. underground property damage. and collapse coverage in the amount of at least 5500.000 for bodily injury or property damage: and (b) motor vehicle liability insurance in the amount of at least 5500.000 for bodily InJury' or property d:lmage. The insurance must be written by an insurer licensed to do business in the state of :-'1innesota. Each building mover shall Ii Ie with the commissioner a certificate evi- dencing the insurance. The insurance policy must provide that the policy may not be canceled without the insurer Iirst giving 30 days written notice to the commissioner of the impending cancellation. On request of the commissioner. the insurer must furnish a duplicate original of the policy and all endorsements to the policy. Subd. 3b. Local permits. A building mover may not move a building on or across :l street or highway without Iirst obtaining a permit from the road authority having jurisdiction over the street or highway. A permit for the movement of a building may not be granted to a building mover who does not possess a current license issued by the commISSIOner. Subd. 3c. Local regulation. No license to move buildings or bond. cash deposit. or insurance coverage may be required by a political subdivision of the state other than the license and insurance coverage required by the commissioner. A road authority may charge a fee for services performed and may require a permit which reasonably regu- lates the hours. routing. movement. parking. or speed limit for a building mover operat- ing on streets or highways under its jurisdiction. A building mover shall comply with the state building code in jurisdictions which have adopted the state building code. and with local ordinances which regulate the moving or removing oibuildings..-\ building mover may not be required to pay a route approval iee to. or obtain a permit for the movement of a building on streets or highways from. a political subdivision which is not also the road authority. This section does not prohibit a political subdivision from charging a permit fee for regulation of activities which do not involve the use of pub- lic streets or highways. Neither the state nor a political subdivision may regulate rates charged by building movers. Subd. 3d. Identification. (a) A building mover's name and address must be dis- played on the power unit of a vehicle used to move buildings and on buildings being moved. (b) Vehicles and buildings must show the name or "doing business as~ name of the license holder operating the vehicle and the community and abbreviation of the state in which the license holder maintains its principal office or in which the vehicle is cus- tomarily based. If the building mover operates a leased vehicle. it may show its name and the name of the lessor on the vehicle. if the lease relationship is clearly shown. If the name of a person other than the building mover appears on the vehicle. the words "operated by~ must immediately precede the name of the building mover. (c) The name and address must be in letters that contrast sharply in color with the background. be readily legible during daylight hours from a distance of 50 feet while the vehicle or building is stationary. and be maintained in a manner that retains the legibility of the markings. The name and address may be shown by use of a removable device if that device meets the identification and legibility requirements of this subdivi- sion. Subd. 3e. Safety rules. (a) .-\ building mover must comply with the rules adopted in section 221.031~: (I) subdivision 6 fOT' driving of motor vehicles: (2) subdivision ~ for parts and accessories necessary for the safe operation. except JS provided In para- fiolation of. or fails to complv s 2 i to 29 or any valid orde'r ~all be guilty of a misdemean- or each and every day of such {II actIon. Each distinct viola- . 110; 1980 c 534 s 85; 1985 c an ding any other law to the :er van shall be deemed to be employee acting within the :ontrary. ~muter van shall not be held t common carriers. nor shall ,ely to the regulation of driv. Irriers or public transit carri- J :ction. the terms used in this other entity who raises. sup- pubhc streets and highways. ufactured homes or modular Jns moving buildings which mt~.. :ion 160.02, subdivision 9. Ig mover in this state unless ect a building mover's vehi- 'perate as a building mover er specifying the name and Imissioner may reasonablv :m~liance by the applican't )0 hlIng fee. A license once .nnual renewal fee and com- spended. lilding mover. shall issue a JVlde one cab card for each :h cab card issued. The cab In the cab of the power unit :21..'11 \11 iI 1)1.< ( \K~IFR~; I'II'FI.l.....1-, 1 \:.<:UFa.'-, '" graph (b): (3) subdivision 10 for Inspection. rep3ir. 3nd mainten3nce: (-I) subdivision 8 for accident reporting: and. (5) on and after-\ugust I. 199..\. subdivisions 2 to 5 for driver qualifications. (bl .-\ towed vehlc!~. other than a fufl trailer. pole trailer. or semitrailer. as thos~ terms are defined :n COlle of Federal RegulatIons. title ..\9. sectIon 300.5. used by a building mover to move a buiiding on a highway is not required to comply with rules for parts and accessories ne::essarv tar ,3fe operation. Subd. -I. License revocation. suspension. denial. The commissioner, after notice and a hearing, may revoke. suspend. or deny a license for: (a) failure of the 3ppiic3nt or license holder to reimburse the road authority for damage to public highways. roads. streets. or utilities that are not paid tar by the license holder's insurer: (b) conduct of the applicant or license holder th3t endangers the health and safety of users of the public highways. roads. streets. or utilities: (c) conduct of the applicant or license holder that obstructs traffic in a manner other than as authorized in the permit: (d) violation of this section: (e) failure to obtain or comply with required loc31 moving permits or permits required by section 169.86: (f) placing or leaving a building on propeny without the permission of the owner of the property or in violation of local ordinances: or (g) abandoning a building after it is first moved under the road permit. For pur- poses of this subdivision. "abandon" means conduct that shows that a building mover has failed to use reasonable diligence in moving a building to the location described in the road permit. Subd. 5. Suspension by commissioner. The commissioner shall suspend a license without a hearing for the following reasons: (a) failure to pay the renewal fee: or (b) failure to comply with insurance requirements. The suspension continues until the fees are paid and the insurance requirements are satisfied. Subd. 6. Penalties. .-\ person who violates. or aids or abets the violation of, any of the provisions of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor. Every distinct violation is a separate offense. Subd. 7. [Repealed. 1983 c 293 s S-I] Subd. 8. [Repealed. 1983 c 293 s 8-1] Subd. 9. [Repealed. 1983 c 293 s 8-1] History: 197ge III 5 1; 1981 e2095 12; 1981 c365 59; 1982e6175:!l; 1983e293 584; 1984 e 520523; 1985 e 299531; 1988 e 544 526; 1992 e 578548-51; 1993 e 117 529 221.82 RECEIPTS CREDITED TO TRU:'<K HIGHWAY FUm. \!oney received by the commissioner under the provisions of this chapter shall be paid into the state treasury and credited to the trunk highway fund. History: 1983 e 293 5 85 221.83 COSTS PAID FRO:\I TRU;\iK HIGHWAY Fl.:;\iD. The costs of administering the provisions of this chapter shall be paid from the trunk highway fund. History: 1983 e 293 5 86 p~-- ..':-:':'T,'~~':"- r~ -,!';'J '::3 a:-2d ZC'J?~':;,q =-~;~LjU:S.? ~ ,,-:1 ,\'-~~. t ~ :;''J i\1~Jl u:' ,-=:.= ,) . ~ n U_1. l-}" . " - , , .l~::fl ~_T~ ~ / DISCUSSION - ORDINP-NCE NO. 200 - AN ORDIN.~CE REGULATING THE MOVING OF ~, BUILDINGS OVER PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND THE PLACEMENT ON PARCELS OF LAND Ml.-. ....IC<:1:1SCr~ asi:.e~ fe.r r:...nal corr::nents or: t.he d::-3.::~ Or::.i:lallCe 200 L~egulc..ti~s the mC'"Jing of bu:.ldings before fcr\~'ardi:1g l::' :.c the Ci tv Council. The consensus of the Commission was to forwa~d t~e ordinance to th~ C~t\' Cc~ncil with a reccmffiendatian ~cr aDD~oval. ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 22, LICENSING OF CONTRACTORS Mr. Johnson stated the City Clerk and Building Department proposed no changes to this ordinance. The proposal is to update the language. Comrr.issioner Wells suggested drywall contractors be licensed by che CJ. ty. Commissioner Squires stated in 1974 the State pre,::luded City reg~lacion of some professions, which may pre-empt local licensing. He s'-lggested Staff check with the Scate to be sure the City is stil~ allow~Q to license. Mr. Johnson stated he will check with the State and he will also check with surrounding cities as to whether or not they licens"" dr-ywall c::>r:;::ractors. It was noted the word "conditio=-Ial" should be corre.:t:e::i to "conditior.ing" in the title of SectiCln ::. ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 23 - REGULATING AND KEEPING OF EQUINES , , Mr. Johnsen explained the ordinance is working extremely well, and he e:.::p=':-l.ir1o?d t.he p~~o.:.:ess ~:::::F::d cc )":~sula::e t.he kf:ep:.ng cf. .3qui:-J.es i7l the Ci ~}". C~ly rrli.r:c:.~ 2.&.n9-~;~ge changes \\:Till 0e :-L3~~. C:13..irperson P-2-=K suggested input be ~eceived from the Equestrian C0u~cil bef~re maki~g any c~an5es. Also, the spelling of "burro" muse be corrected. ORD.fN.~CE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 24 - PROV:WING SALARIES OF THE [>.!AYOR P.ND COUNCIL MEMBERS Mr. Johnson stated no changes are being proposed. The ordinance will be renumbered. The Commission had no comment. ORDTN.l-..NCE REVIEW ORDINANCE CLERK/TREASURER A.WJ CRE.1l.TING TR.E-~S<,'RER NO. THE 26 ABOLISH THE POSITION OF CITY POSITION OF CITY CLERK AND CITY ~':l. . '. : ...-.:.:: sc:~ .::-xo =- 5. i~.~ j : hi:::: nee.js :..:-) be TL2i r: r_~.=:..:-. .=:<~ =::.5 a. :=::::[ .:l: F~ t-::- ,-.,-.-..' ..-, -' -- ~ -. . -... - - . T~>-~- '::':"::-:-.r.;_:3S i 0':.: r~~d :-.:.-: COr:1rriel"l~. OREINARCE REVI!~W - ORDINANCE NO. 27 - STREET llJ_.,{E CHANGE - CHJ.NGING THFI: }..'!']J{E :F' 169r:H _~\r'"'E}rJE ]...~A: TO 169TH L~__VE ~-rvv. IN .s'y~\,rES'TER' S c.~..D!)IT~CN , I ~. \..' - " ~ :- :1-= .. .~ ~'. . 1. ~ ~ " ..: - , , CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 \ I PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - JANUARY 14, 1997 MINUTES The Regular Bi -Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Jay Squires on January 14, 1997, 7:04 p.m. at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners present: Maynard Apel, Lynette Barry, Jeffrey Luedtke, Randy Peek, Lorna Wells None City Planning, Jeff Johnson Commissioners absent: Also present: APPROVAL OF MINUTES December 10, 1996: Correct as written. MOTION by Luedtke, Seconded by Wells, approval as presented. carried unanimously. Motion , PUBLIC HEARINGS: REZONING (R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RURAL, TO GR, GENERAL RECREATION - SECTION 9) and SPECIAL USE PERMIT (GOLF DRIVING RANGE AND PUTTING COURSE) 2989 166TH LANE NW - JEFF LEADENS Mr. Johnson explained the applicant has revised his plans to incorporate more land into the proposal; therefore, public hearing notices must be mailed to other property owners. The items are tentatively scheduled for the January 28, 1997, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. MOTION by Wells, Seconded by Luedtke, to table Items 3 and 4 to January 28 due to notification. Motion carried unanimously. ~, REVIEW ORDINANCES - ORDINANCE NO. 200, MOVING OF BUILDINGS Mr. Johnson explained the proposal is to repeal Ordinance 4 and Section 4.11 of Ordinance 8, and Staff has drafted a new Ordinance 200 and an amendment to Ordinance 8, Section 7.03, Special Uses. Special Use Permits will now be required for homes to be moved onto residential properties in the City. He then highlighted the sections of the proposed Ordinance 200. A public hearing before the Planning Commission is scheduled for January 28, 1997. Commissioner Peek asked if this only affects moving a building off a person's property. Mr. Johnson stated no permit would be needed for a , building to be moved to another location on the same property as long as / setback requi.rements are needed, but a new building permit would be needed if a foundation is added. Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 14, 1997 Page 2 / (Review Ordinances - Ordinance No. 200, Moving of Buildings, Continued) Commissioner Wells was concerned about the height of a building and th~ safety of the moving equipment. She proposed the movers submit proof that the equipment has been inspected recently. Mr. Johnson stated other ordinance provisions regulate the height requirements. The movers must be licensed by the state, so the safety questions are addressed by the state. The other Commissions agreed it would not be necessary to add further requirements for the movers. The Commissioners were comfortable with the ordinance as proposed, though the items under Section 3 must be corrected to be in numerical order. ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 201, REGULATING MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS Mr. Johnson explained the intent is to repeal Ordinance 6 and adopt the redrafted Ordinance 201. The new ordinance is in line with those ordinances of Ham Lake and Ramsey. He briefly reviewed the sections of the ordinance, noting this only applies to manufactured home parks. If a manufactured home is placed on a single family lot, the single family lot regulations would apply. / Commissioner Barry suggested the sentence in Section 4 be amended to state, "The owner of the manufactured home park shall furnish a copy of covenants, restrictions, and by-laws of the manufactured home park to the City." The Commission agreed. There were no further comments. ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE 202, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Mr. Johnson explained Ordinance 11 would be repealed and replaced with Ordinance 202. In reviewing the proposed ordinance, the following comments and recommended changes were made: Section 3, Membership and Composition: Change "shall consist of seven members from the City" to "shall consist of seven residents from the City" . There was some question as to whether a provision on membership should be that the member be an eligible voter. There was no consensus for that change. Commissioner Wells wondered if consideration had been given to having minor representation or student members, though they would not vote. After discussion, the Commission noted that is sometimes done for councils or school boards, but they were not aware of such members serving on commissions. There was no consensus for that idea. Section 4, Absences: The Commission discussed the issue of absences. A concern raised by Commissioner Wells is when only two members show up for a meeting and there are important items to consider, which happened / once last year. Possibly there should be some provision for the person who will be absent to fax or mail their opinion on the items. Commissioner Apel stated there is always that problem when dealing with Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 12, 1996 Page 4 , j (Public Hearing: Lot Split/Variance - 17841 Bluebird Street, Continued) approved in the past. This hardship is primarily one of the platting process. He doesn't see this as an issue of setting a precedent for the subdivision in the rest of the development. If this was platted under the ordinance, is it pushing it in terms of lot acreage with the 20 percent variance on lot size for Parcel B. Mr. Hinzman suggested the Commission table the item temporarily while he goes to City Hall to research the date this area was platted. The Commission agreed. This item was continued later in the meeting. ~ DISCUSSION - REVIEW OF ORDINANCE NO.4, MOVING OF BUILDINGS Mr. Johnson explained Staff will be placing three to five ordinances on the Planning Commission agenda for discussion of updating and revision. The first one is Ordinance 4, Moving of Buildings. All references to Grow Township will be changed to City of Andover. Staff feels the ordinance requires a lot of red tape and that the requirements for insurance, bonding and cash deposit should be deleted. Many other communities do not have a moving ordinance because of the regulations' under the Uniform Building Code and State Statutes. There is also a provision in Ordinance 8, Section 4.11 that addresses the relocation of structures. Staff is recommending that provision be moved to this ) ordinance. It is also the Staff's recommendation that an applicant should go through a Special Use Permit process, so the residents of an area where a structure will be brought to will be notified. Chairperson Squires stated that the provisions of Ordinance 4 and the section in Ordinance 8 are different, in that Ordinance 4 relates to moving the structure, and Ordinance 8 deals with the requirements once the structure reaches its final destination. Though they are different, he th.)ug::t they could be combined to one moving and placement of buildings ordinance. He also felt that since 1968 when the ordinance was adopted and 1979 when it was amended, State law has regulated many of the things this ordinance tried to address. Any conflicts with State law should be removed from the ordinance, including the entire Section 4 dealing with cash deposits, bonds and insurance. The Commission generally agreed to the revisions to the ordinance as outlined by Staff. DISCUSSION - REVIEW OF ORDINANCES NO.6, REGULATING MOBILE HOME PARKS Mr. Johnson stated Staff feels there is a need to keep the ordinance in place even though there are no areas zoned for mobile home parks in the City. He also suggested Staff contact several of the surrounding cities to compare ordinance requirements. The Planning Commission suggested the League of Minnesota Cities be contacted and that the City Attorney / be contacted to be sure the ordinance is in line with other ordinances and current State law. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL AcnON February 18. 1997 DATE AGENDA Non~9.!ltm t>O. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM t>O. Amend Ordinance No.8 Section 4.11 - Relocated Structures & Section 7.03 - Special Uses BY: 1~. REQUEST The City Council is asked to approve an amendment to Ordinance No.8 (Zoning Ordinance). Section 4.11 - Relocated Structures i Said amendment would delete this entire section of this ordinance. Section 7.03 - Special Uses Said amendment would require a special use permit for relocated dwelling units moved onto a residential zoned lot in the City. Please advise staff in regards to any recommended or proposed changes. " / MOTION BY: SECOND BY: J CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 8VVVV AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: Ordinance No.8 is hereby amended as follows: Section 4.11 - Relocated Structures This Section will be deleted in its entirety. Section 7 03 - Special Uses Special use permits for uses not listed herein shall not be granted except where the City Council determines that said uses are similar in character to those listed herein. / Within any of the following districts, no land or structure shall be used for the following uses by districts except by special use permit and in accordance with the criteria as stated in Section 5.03 (B): Residential Districts , J Barber Shops Beauty Shops Cabinet Making/Wood Working in R-I District Only Cemeteries Christmas Tree Sales Churches Clubs and Lodges Colleges and Similar Institutions Commercial Dog Kennel in R-I District Only Commercial Greenhouse Craft and antique businesses in R-4 districts in buildings designated as historical sites by a county, state, or nationally recognized historical organization Day Nurseries (thirteen {13} or more children) Excavations except when a building permit has been issued Golf Course Highway Construction Materials (processing and storage) J 4.08 Vacated Streets (M.S. 462.358, Subd. 7 and M.S. 412.851) \Vhenever any street, alley, easement or public way is vacated by official action, the zoning district abuning the centerline of the said vacated area shall not be affected by such proceeding. 4.09 Platting All buildings hereafter erected upon unplaned land shall be so placed that they will not obstruct proper street extensions or other features of proper subdivision and land planning. All subdivision of land shall be in accordance with existing planing Ordinances. (SA, 2-14-75) 4.10 Dwelling Units Prohibited , / No cellar, garage, tent, travel trailer, basement with unfinished structure above, or accessory building shall at any time be used as a dwelling unit. Mobile homes shall be located in a mobile home park approved by the City and the State of Minnesota, except as otherwise permined by Ordinance. -4:1-1 ReIoeated--Struetuf'es- ~ing~ll-eomp~reg1:tlating--the-nw-ving-e-f btllidings ovcr stree:s and alleys ill the City. (g,'.,2 11 75) ~e-or-ether-strueture-ts-~nte-tr-va€af1t lot, the-Planning &mmiss-too--shaH-reporHo-ilie-Gity-Betmei!-wftether-the-strueftlre-witl-ee compatible v.ith-ether de\'elo~t--in-the-area, and eonform to aH-AfldtwerGtfy codes frI1.d OrdiflB:flees. If the City Council eOfleU:f3 .rith the decision afchc Plar~-llI1; Commissiol1 that a strueture \';ould depreciate the area into whieh it is mo,oed. it may '1.itl-.hold issuanci! ofa permit fOf sych f@location. The aj3J31icant shall Jubmit photo;raphs tahn from tv.-a (2) or :nore :illf;les efthe strueture te be moved and photos of :he lot In wfiich the structure is :0 be !ocat2d tog~,La ,.itll. adjac~ut lot3 J:I.d jtrlH.:tun.:s. T:;c:~c rC"luircm':':uts do flat apI'll:; :0 consmJction Jhzds :r otb:. t:mr:Ofw' :trucrurc:s :0 be loeat:d on :1 :ot :Jr :i:::::,t.::.:n . ... -- (18~ months Jf :..ss. ~.l~ Front Setbacks . / :Q \ ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA ITEM 6. Public Hearing: Amend Ordinance N Sections 4.11 and 7.03 - Amendment Related to Relocation of Structures DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT 8. January 28. 1997 BY: APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to hold a public hearing to review the following amendments to Ordinance No.8. Section 4.11 - Relocated Structures This Section as proposed would be deleted from the Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 8). Information and requirements pertaining to relocated structures is included in Ordinance No. 200 - An Ordinance Regulating the Moving of Buildings Over Public Rights-of- Ways and the Placement on Parcels of Land. , , Section 7.03 - Special Uses This Section as proposed would require a Special Use Permit for all relocated dwelling units (homes) in residential zoned districts. / R-=:guJ.al' ,;nCio'v'er Plar;ni!Jq and Zoning Cornmission Meeting MinuteD . ~-.'i.ll.1ary 2::', 1997 Page c: / (Public: Hearing: St~.ucture Prior to .:'..mel1ded Special Use Permi t: Cons tl.-uct Accessory Principal - Bleeker, Continued) Mr. Johnson noted Staff has received no complaints on the existing use. Some concern has be9n raised concerning the movement of dirt on the property, that is pushing and grading. That will be discussed with the property owners further to be sure there is no interference with the wetlands. Fill will probably be needed to establish a building pad, but the Bleekers are working with the Building Department to establish the pad fer the principle structure. He noted the Bleekers are asking for two years to build the principal structure, but typically the City has only 2llowed one year. Commisisoner Wells wondered if this should be tabled until it can be determined that there is a buildable site for the principle structure. Mr. Johnson didn't think there would be a problem, though some fill may be needed. The Bleekers are working with the Building Department. I:1 discussing condition 2 on the prepared Resolution, the Com:nission felt the wording needs to be changed to reflect the sunset clause. Mr. Johnse':1 explair.ed c:;ndi tion 5 is an agreement reached with the Bleekers that the greenhouses would be relocated to the rear of the house when the principal structure is constructed. Also, another condition could be adced or, a sunset clause for the accessory building, that construction shall ~egin wi thin on":: year of approval of the Amended Special Use Permit. MOTION by Squires, Seconded by Luedtke, to ::::'ecommend approval of the Special Use Permit request in the attached Resolution with the deletion of the c:urre!lt #2 and inserting in its place a provision that simply states, "The ccnstruction of the principal structure must be initiated within O~~ y~ar of the granting of the Condj.tional Use Permi~". Motion carried on ct 6-Yes, j,.-Abstaln (Wells) vote. This will be placed on the February 18, 1997, City Cou~cil agenda. 8:25 p.m. ~ PfJBLIC HEARING: J..MEND ORD INANCE NO. 8 I SECTIONS _~,{ENDMENT RELATED TO RELOC.itTION OF STRUCTURES 4. .11 AND 7.03 8:~~. p.~.. Mr. ,Joh~e~~ ~eviewed the propose~ R~e~dmeD:2 :!>?~.=:~i!1a -~ ~~ the ~e:SC~:lon .Jf s~~~c~~res. MOTIeK::-:y ~\el:si S-::-c::;::d~d b'.J 3ar:::.-y, :.-.) oper:. ~~.ne p1..:.~lic '. . - ca~~le~ ~~a~1~~~:2~~r. 3: 27 p. ;-:"L. T:le:::.-e was l:C public r.cS::i~712.!1Y. . . !-.ea~ ::-.:.9- . \.tir,+- ~ '1" l . -' '- _. '__1.. J.\!';)TION t-.,. ~\.=.~~s, -. - ',,...,..- ..... - .... ,'4. ......s'.... _'. S~.J.i2..--=s , ~_c ,~ ":';,::,S.:?- ::'_~~=,~ i.~ . . ......== ,~i.. ~- _1. :-::; . \1:-::-::'-",,,,": -'-'-1"!'~-:-7-"':' _..~._-:-:-L,~y~:~.:....:. C : '-_ ' '-. .. :(0'7'1 ':':./ ~.. .- :: -. - .~ ,.... ::. .- .... 7'"" ~ - ~ ...:: . ~- \/,-,':'" -, / '- / CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday, January 28, 1997 at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota to discuss and amend the following Seetions of Ordinance No.8, the Zoning Ordinance. Section 4.11 - Relocated Structures Said amendment would delete this entire section of the ordinance. This section of the Zoning Ordinance will be replaced with a new ordinance, Ordinance No. 200 - An Ordinance Regulating the Moving of Buildings Over Public Rights-of-Way and the Placement of Such Buildings on Parcels of Land in the City of Andover. Seetion 7.03 - Special Uses Said amendment would require a special use permit for relocated dwelling units moved onto a residential zoned lot in the City. All wrinen and verbal comments will be received at that time and location. A copy of the ordinance will be available at the Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting. The above information will also be available for public review at the Oak View Middle School on the evening prior to the meeting. 1/ +- I // ~-<-tl.~ (:' .-cL..- Victoria V olk, City Clerk Publication Dates: January 17, 1997 January 24, 1997 / \ CITY OF ANDOVER AGENDA Non~g}mt>n r-.o. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM r-.o. Adopt Ordinance No. 6C (To Repeal Ordinance No.6) Planning Jeff Johnson d3: REQUEST The City Council is asked to adopt Ordinance 6C. As proposed, this ordinance (An Ordinance Regulating Manufactured Home Parks) would be deleted. For further information, please refer to the November 12, 1996 and January 14, 1997 Planning and Zoning Commission minutes. .. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: BY: , , CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 6C AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 6 ADOPTED THE 11 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1970, KNOWN AS AN ORDINANCE REGULATING MOBILE HOME PARKS AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: Ordinance No.6 is hereby amended as follows: Ordinance No.6, adopted August II, 1970, Ordinance No. 6A adopted August 15, 1987 and Ordinance No. 6B adopted July 20,1982 are hereby repealed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this _ day of 1997. ) A TIEST: CITY OF ANDOVER Victoria V olk, City Clerk J. E. McKelvey, Mayor / CITY OF ANDOVER AGENDA Non.u~9.Atm r..o. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Febfuary 18. 1997 DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM r..o. Adopt Ordinance No. 201 Regulating Manufactured Home Parks Planning Jeff Johnson BY: d4. REQUEST The City Council is asked to review and adopt Ordinance No 201 - An Ordinance Regulating Manufactured Home Parks. Please advise staff in regards to any recommended or proposed changes , J \ , ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: , I CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 201 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: Section 1. PU(J)oses. The purpose of this ordinance is to allow manufactured home parks in permitted zoning districts in the City with appropriate design and site requirements. Section 2. Definitions. The following words and terms shall have the following meanings in this ordinance. Dwelling Unit - a residential building or portion thereof intended for occupancy by a family. It shall include manufactured homes. Manufactured Home - a dwelling unit, transportable in one (1) or more sections, which is eight (8) feet or more in width, or forty (40) feet or more in length, or when erected on site complies with the minimum floor area requirements as stated in the Zoning Ordinance, and which is built on a permanent chassis and designed to be used as a dwelling with or without a permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities, and includes the plumbing, heating, air conditioning, and electrical systems contained therein; except that the term includes any structure which meets all the requirements and with respect to which the manufacturer voluntarily files a certificate required by the Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and complies with the standards established under the Minnesota State Uniform Building Code. Manufactured Home Park - Any premises (minimum acreage 20 acres, which is contiguous) which has facilities (public sewer and public water) to accommodate more than one (I) oceupied manufactured home on a parcel ofland and is properly zoned for such use. . J Unit - a seetion of ground in a manufactured home park that meets the minimum lot area per dwelling unit and other minimum fequirements as stated in the Zoning Ofdinance and complies with all other requirements as stated in this ordinanee. No more than one (1) manufactufed home shall be placed on any single lot or unit. Section 3. Manufactured Home Park Standards. , / A manufactured home park plan shall show and comply with the platting ordinance which establishes regulations and proeedures for the subdivision and platting of land in the City and all other applicable City ordinances. The manufactured park plan shall also include and comply with the following site requirements and design standards: 1) Additional minimum setback requirements: a) Minimum distance between manufactured homes is 30 feet. b) Where a manufactured home park abuts a commercial, industrial or residential zoning district, there shall be a setback of at least one hundred (100) feet which shall be landscaped and maintained (landscaping and design to be approved by City Council). 2) Decks and Patios a) A concrete patio (four inch thickness) or deck shall be constructed on the ground not less than five (5) feet from each manufactured home. The patio or deck shall not be less than 200 square feet in area. , / 3) Landscaping a) At least one (I) tree shall be placed and maintained on each lot (tree type and location to be approved by the City). b) Each lot shall be sodded and maintained with grass with the exception of areas covered by the home, patios, sidewalks, decks, parking areas and off-street parking areas. 4) Access, Parking and Garages a) An off-street parking area of at least two hundred and twenty (220) square feet and a garage (minimum 220 square feet) shall be provided for each manufactured home lot. The parking area shall be asphalt or concrete and meet City construction and design standards. \ ) b) Two (2) or more parking areas (guest/overflow parking) shall be provided in the manufactured home park. One (1) space for each manufactured home lot shall be provided. c) Each manufactured home shall have driveway access to a street. 5) Refuse eontainers I a) All refuse containers that are shared by the residents in the park shall be screened from view of adjacent properties and roads by wood fenee or other material approved by the City. 6) Exterior storage of boats and trailers a) All boats and trailers located in the park shall be stored within an enclosed structure. 7) Parks/Open Space a) A minimum often (10) percent of the total manufactured home park shall be devoted to park and recreation and/or open space. 8) Office, Laundry, Recreational Facilities, Storm Shelter and Civil Defense a) Each manufactured home park shall contain one or more enclosed facility buildings with space devoted to office, storm and civil defense shelter (basement), laundry, sanitary and recreational facilities. The building shall be designed to accommodate at least fifteen (15) square feet of space per manufactured home lot, but in no case shall the building be less than 2,500 square feet. Section 4. Covenants and By-Laws The owner of the manufactured home park shall furnish a copy of covenants, restrictions and by-laws of the manufactured home park to the City. Section 5. Exemptions. The provisions contained in this ordinance shall not apply to manufactured homes or travel trailers that are used for offiee spaee by construction companies or firms while in the process of working on approved projects by the City. Such units shall not be allowed to be utilized for the purposes of habitation for a period not to exceed six (6) months. Section 6 Penalties. Any person who violates any provision of this ordinanee shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to applicable fines and imprisonment defined by State law. ;' In addition to the penalties imposed by this ordinance, the City may exereise, with or separately from such penalties, all and any other legal and equitable remedies then available to the City by this ordinance, or by statute, or by other ordinance of the City, or by applicable rules or regulations, to enforce this ordinance, including, without limitation, , J injunction. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this _ day of ,1997. ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER Victoria V olk, City Clerk J. E. McKelvey, Mayor , -' Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 14, 1997 Page 2 J (Review Ordinances - Ordinance No. 200, Moving of Buildings, Continued) Commissioner Wells was concerned about the height of a building and the safety of the moving equipment. She proposed the movers submit proof that the equipment has been inspected recently. Mr. Johnson stated other ordinance provisions regulate the height requirements. The movers must be licensed by the state, so the safety questions are addressed by the state. The other Commissions agreed it would not be necessary to add further requirements for the movers. The Commissioners were comfortable with the ordinance as proposed, though the items under Section 3 mUjt be corrected to be in numerical order. @ ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 201, REGULATING MANUFACTl1RBD BOMB PARKS Mr. Johnson explained the intent is to repeal Ordinance 6 and adopt the redrafted Ordinance 201. The new ordinance is in line with those ordinances of Ham Lake and Ramsey. He briefly reviewed the sections of the ordinance, noting this only applies to manufactured home parks. If a manufactured home is placed on a single family lot, the single family lot regulations would apply. , J Commissioner Barry suggested the sentence in Section 4 be amended to state, "The owner of the manufactured home park shall furnish a copy of covenants, restrictions, and by-laws of the manufactured home park to the City." The Commission agreed. There were no further comments. ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE 202, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Mr. Johnson explained Ordinance 11 would be repealed and replaced with Ordinance 202. In reviewing the proposed ordinance, the following comments and recommended changes were made: Section 3, Membership and Composition: Change "shall consist of seven members from the City" to "shall consist of seven residents from the City". There was some question as to whether a provision on membership should be that the member be an eligible voter. There was no consensus for that change. Commissioner Wells wondered if consideration had been given to having minor representation or student members, though they would not vote. After discussion, the Commission noted that is sometimes done for councils or school boards, but they were not aware of such members serving on commissions. There was no consensus for that idea. .' Section 4, Absences: The Commission discussed the issue of absences. A concern raised by Commissioner Wells is when only two members show up -' for a meeting and there are important items to consider, which happened once last year. Possibly there should be some provision for the person who will be absent to fax or mail their opinion on the items. Commissioner Apel stated there is always that problem when dealing with Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 12, 1996 Page 4 I (Public Hearing: Lot Spli t/Variance - 17841 Bluebird Street, Continued) approved in the past. This hardship is primarily one of the platting process. He doesn't see this as an issue of setting a precedent for the subdivision in the rest of the development. If this was platted under the ordinance, is it pushing it in terms of lot acreage with the 20 percent variance on lot size for Parcel B. Mr. Hinzman suggested the Commission table the item temporarily while he goes to City Hall to research the date this area was platted. The Commission agreed. This item was continued later in the meeting. DISCUSSION - REVIEW OF ORDINANCE NO.4, MOVING OF BUILDINGS ) Mr. Johnson explained Staff will be placing three to five ordinances on the Planning Commission agenda for discussion of updating and revision. The first one is Ordinance 4, Moving of Buildings. All references to Grow Township will be changed to City of Andover. Staff feels the ordinance requires a lot of red tape and that the requirements for insurance, bonding and cash deposit should be deleted. Many other communities do not have a moving ordinance because of the regulations under the Uniform Building Code and State Statutes. There is also a provision in Ordinance 8, Section 4.11 that addresses the relocation of structures. Staff is recommending that provision be moved to this ordinance. It is also the Staff's recommendation that an applicant should go through a Special Use Permit process, so the residents of an area where a structure will be brought to will be notified. Chairperson Squires stated that the provisions of Ordinance 4 and the section in Ordinance 8 are different, in that Ordinance 4 relates to moving the structure, and Ordinance 8 deals with the requirements once the structure reaches its final destination. Though they are different, he thought they could be combined to one moving and placement of buildings ordinance. He also felt that since 1968 when the ordinance was adopted and 1979 when it was amended, State law has regulated many of the things this ordinance tried to address. Any conflicts with State law should be removed from the ordinance, including the entire Section 4 dealing with cash deposits, bonds and insurance. The Commission generally agreed to the revisions to the ordinance as outlined by Staff. r:J') ~ISCUSSION - REVIEW OF ORDINANCES NO.6, REGULATING MOBILE HOME PARKS Mr. Johnson stated Staff feels there is a need to keep the ordinance in place even though there are no area~ zoned for mobile home parks in the City. He also suggested Staff contact several of the surrounding cities to compare ordinance requirements. The Planning Commission suggested the League of Minnesota Cities be contacted and that the City Attorney ,/ be contacted to be sure the ordinance is in line with other ordinances and current State law. J CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 6 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING MOBILE HOME PARKS AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF. Be it ordained by the City Council'of the city of Andover, Anoka County, Minnesota: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this Ordinance, the terms defined in this Ordinance shall have the meanings given them in this Section. ~~ i) a. Manufactured Home. A manufactured home means a structure, transportable in one (1) or more sectiona, which in the traveling mode, is eight (8) body feet or more in width, or forty (40) body feet or more in length, or, when erected on site, is three hundred twenty (320) or more square feet, and which is built on a permanent chassis and designed to be used as a dwelling with or without permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities, and includes plumbing, heating, air. conditioning, and electrical systems contained therein; except that the term includes any structure which meets all the requirements and with respect to which the manufacturer voluntarily files a certificate required by the Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and complies with the standards established under Minnesota Statute 327 including the Manufactured Home Building Code adopted therein. (6B, 7- 20-82) b. Mobile Home park. A mobile home park shall be any premises which has facilities to accommodate one (1) or more occupied mobile homes. c. Unit. Unit means a section of ground in a mobile home park of not less than five thousand five hundred (5,500) square feet of unoccupied space in an area designated as the location for ~ne (1) mobile home, off-street parking space for two (2) automobiles and other uses considered pertinent to the establishment and use of a mobile home residence as permitted by this Ordinance. d. Person. Person shall be construed to include persons, partnerships, firm, company, corporation, tenant, owner, la3see, their agents, heirs, and assigns. / . . J ( , . J permit. Application therefor may be made to the Building Inspector as in the ease of original permits, and must be submitted to the Council prior to the expiration of the r-- original ninety (90) day period. One (1) renewal permit may be granted upon good cause shown, but in no event shall a renewal permit be granted for a period in excess of ninety (90) days and not more than one (1) such renewal permit shall be granted. e. The provisions contained in this Section shall not apply to mobile homes or travel trailers that are used for office space by construction companies while in the process of working on projects within the city. Such mobile home or trailer shall not be allowed to be used for such purpose for a period in excess of six (6) months without obtaining from the City Council, a permit therefor. This permit shall be in addition to any permit allowed by this Section. (6A, 8-15-78) SECTION 3 PERMIT a. Application for a special permit to establish, construct, and maintain a Mobile Home Park under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be made to the City Council of the City of Andover. b. The application for a permi.t shall be accompanied by four (4) copies of the Mobile Home Park plan showing the following, either existing or proposed: 1. The extent and area proposed for Mobile Home park purposes. 2. Roads and driveways. 3. Location of sites or units for mobile homes. { ~ 4. Location and number of sanitary conveniences. 5. proposed disposition of surface drainage. 6. proposed street surfacing and lighting. 7. Off street parking. 8. Patios. ! 9. Location of community building. 10. Location of recreation facilities. 11. Location of sidewalks. 12. Location of setback lines. 13. Location of screenin3' planting, green areas, etc. L b. Each unit shall have a gross area of not less than five thousand five hundred (5,500) square feet. ( .' r c. Each unit shall have a minimum width of fifty ( SO' ) feet , / measured at right angles to its side lines. d. , ~ J Front setback of Mobile Home shall be no less than twenty (20') feet from the curb and no less than five (5') feet from the sidewalk. e. There shall be not less than twenty-five (25') feet of space between Mobile Homes in all directions. A patio shall be constructed on the ground beside each Mobile Home parking space; this patio shall be not less than two hundred (200) square feet in area constructed of concrete with four inch (4") minimum thickness or approved equal. At least one (1) deep rooted shade tree (minimum diameter two [2] inches at time of planting) shall be placed and maintained on each unit. f. g. h. Except for the area used for the Mobile Home, patio, sidewalk and off-street parking space the entire unit shall be sodded and maintained with grass. Each unit shall abut on and have access to a street. This street shall be constructed of a minimum of one and one- half (1 1/2") inches of bituminous surface material on a suitable base of at least four (4") inch thickness. ( '. 1. j. An integral concrete curb and sidewalk shall be constructed on each side of the street and the face of this curb shall be at least sixteen (16') feet from the centerline of said street. The sidewalk shall be not less than thirty-six (36") inches wide. The curb design shall be of a type approved by the City Engineer. k. There shall be an unused area of not less than thirty-five (35') feet in depth along each public street or way and fifty (SO') feet in depth along each trunk or county highway and this area shall be sodded and planted. 1. Every Mobile Home site shall provide for a minimum setback of at least twenty five (25') feet on all sides except where abutting upon a public street, way or residential area. This area shall be planted to provide a screen between the Mobile Home Park and adjacent property. A chain link fence of at least five (5') feet in height shall be constructed inside the live buffer. m. Where a Mobile Home Park site abuts upon a residential area, there shall be a setback of at least thirty (30') feet and this area shall be landscaped. ~,- n. The parking of more than one (1) Mobile Home on any single unit shall not be permitt~d. , \ J z. Overflow parking (other than on-lot parking) shall be provided throughout the mobile home park, a minimum of one (1) space for each three (3) mobile home lots. (- aa. There shall be no retail sales of mobile homes or accessories thereto in the limits of the mobile home park. bb. The mobile home bottom shall be enclosed with a commercially produced fireproof material of the same color, material and configuration as the mobile home itself. The enclosure shall cover from the frame or bottom of the chassis of the mobile home to the concrete pad or ground. cc. No building or structure shall be added to a mobile home except an unenclosed or unheated porch or a car port. The total square footage of all additional structures shall not exceed one hundred fifty (150) square feet and no structure shall extend from the mobile home more than eight (8') feet. SECTION 6 MOBILE HOME PARK FACILITIES BUILDING a. Each planned mobile home residential development shall contain one (1) or more enclosed facility building with space devoted to offices, storm shelter (basement), laundry, sanitary and recreational facilities. The building shall be so designed so as to provide at least twelve (12) sq. feet of space per mobile home lot, but in no case shall the building be less than two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet. SECTION 7 REGISTER OF OCCUPANTS It shall be the duty oE each licensee and permittee to keep a register containing a record of all mobile home owners and occupants located within the park. The register shall contain the following information: a. The name and address of each mobile home occupant. b. The name and address of the owner of each mobile home. , c. The make, model,../year and license number of each mobile home and motor vehicle. d. The state, territory or county issuing such licenses. e. The date of arrival and of departure of each mobile home. The park shall keep the register available for inspection at / all times by law enforcement officers, public health officials and \ other officials whose duties necessitate acquisition of the information contained in the reaister. The reaister record for . . - / , J Passed, adopted and approved by the City Council this 11th day of August, 1970 CITY OF ANDOVER Louis Appleby Mayor ATTEST: Carol pinheiro ele rk , , , / (- ( '- CITY OF AN DOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 6A , / AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.6 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING MOBILE HOME PARKS AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 2 - Mobile Ho:ne Location is hereby amended to include: Subsection (e). The provisions contained in this Section shall not apply to mobile homes or travel trailers that are used for office space by construction companies while in the process of working on projects within the City. Such mobile home or trailer shall not be allowed to be used for such purpose for a period in excess of six (6) months without obtaining from the City Council, a permit therefor. This permit shall be in addition to any permit allowed by this Section. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 15th day of .\.l<O"ust , 1973. _'2..:__________ 0-' .____ \ / CITY OF ANDOVER ---_..._~. ".- ATTESTI:\ i../ "~'--- '.... .~X-' ,"-./' . j" t . ----:=>':{,/i('iL' \ .,/ / - :A:,. t,:...t.,;..t..-a--j.- Patricia K. - Lind.qi.list" - Clerk ~ W-.J..lMd Je y W' schitl - Mayor .. " , J , CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA J ORDINANCE NO. 6 B AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.6, ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE REGULATING MOBILE HOME PARKS, ADOPTED AUGUST 11, 1970. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: Ordinance No.6 is hereby amended as follows: Section 1. Definitions is amended to read as follows: a. Manufactured Home. A manufactured home means a structure, transportable in one or more sections. which in the traveling mode. is eight body feet or more in width. or forty body feet or more in length. or. when erected on site. is 320 or more square feet. and which" is built on a permanent chassis and designed to be used as a dwelling with or without permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities. and includes the plumbing. heating. air conditioning. and electrical systems contained therein; except that the term includes any structure which meets all the requirements and with respect to which the manufacturer voluntarily files a certificate required by the Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and complies with the standards established under Minnesota Statute 327 including the Manu- factured Home Building Code adopted therein. , J e. Wherever the term "mobile home" is used throughout this ordinance. it shall be amended to "manufactured home". Section 2. Mobile Home Location is amended to read as follows: c. No person shall park or locate or occupy any manufactured home on any premises or lot unless such manufactured home meets the requirements of the zoning district in which it is to be located or is within an approved manufactured home park pursuant to this ordinance; except the parking of only one travel trailer less than 200 square feet in floor area is permitted provided no living quarters shall be maintained or any business practiced in said travel trailer when such trailer is so parked or stored. No manufactured home which does not meet the definition and standards required in Section 1, Subdivision a, shall be allowed within the City of Andover unless such manufactured home was located within the City prior to adoption of this ordinance. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 20th day of July 1982. CITY OF ANDOVER Q~~,.' ~ Jer/y Win chi1:1, Mayor . J CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION February 18. 1997 DATE AGENDA Non~9.M:m f\O. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM f\O. Adopt Ordinance No. 7 A (To Repeal Ordinanee No.7) Planning Jeff Johnson cXDI REQUEST The City Council is asked to adopt Ordinance 7 A. As proposed, this ordinance (An Ordinance Regulating the Quantity and Type of Materials Used For Building Construction and Setting Certain Construction Standards) would be deleted. / For further information, please refer to the November 12, 1996 Planning and Zoning minutes. " , / MOTION BY: SECOND BY: BY: / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 7A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.7, ADOPTED THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1971, KNOWN AS AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE QUANTITY AND TYPE OF MATERIALS USED FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND SETIING CERTAIN CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: Ordinance No.7 is hereby amended as follows: Ordinance No.7, adopted January 29, 1971 is hereby repealed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this _ day of 1997. ATIEST: CITY OF ANDOVER " J Victoria V olk, City Clerk J.E. McKelvey, Mayor . I Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 12, 1996 Page 5 / LOT SPLIT/VARIANCE - 17841 BLUEBIRD STREET NW - CONTINUED Mr. Hinzman reported the Zoning Ordinance was adopted October 21, 1970. The plat for the area including Bluebird Street was recorded December 9, 1971, about one year into the present zoning Ordinance. Commissioner Luedtke stated the lot in question is large compared to the other ones, but he would be opposed to a lot split because someone wants to build a new house in a development that requires 2.5-acre lots. He did not see the hardship. Commissioner Peek stated because the property was platted after the adoption of the ordinance, the issue of grandfathering does not apply. From his perspective, the question becomes does the degree of the variance alter the other quantities and qualities of the neighborhood. He felt the magnitude of the variance does impact it. Commissioner Wells noted from the public testimony of existing neighbors definitely opposing this and that the granting of the request might create more problems in the neighborhood, she too is against it.' Chairperson Squires stated in looking at the standards the City has in the ordinance and the hardship required when dealing with variances, it comes down to whether there is a reasonable use of the property without the variance. There is nothing that suggests any factors that there would be an undue hardship created if the variance wasn't granted. The only thing that would have been significant to him is if this plat would have predated the ordinance. That is not the case here. " ./ MOTION by Wells, Seconded by Peek, to recommend denial to the City Council of the lot split and variance at 17841 Bluebird Street NW for the following reasons: 1} Lack of evidentiary hardship according to lot usei 2} possible drainage problem with the drain field of the septic .systemi 3} public testimony of adjacent neighbors were definitely against it as recorded for the public hearingi 4) denial of the variance does not preclude reasonable use of the propertYi and S} granting the variance would have significant impact on the locale, namely that the size of the newly created parcels would not be consistent with the neighborhood pattern. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Apel, Barry, Putnam) vote. This will be on the December 3, 1996, City Council agenda. 8:10 p~m. ~ DISCUSSION - REVIEW OF ORDINANCE NO.7, MATERIALS USED FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Mr. Johnson stated the Building Official has reviewed this ordinance and recommends that it be removed entirely because all of the information given is also in the Uniform Building Code. The Commission agreed. " DISCUSSION - REVIEW OF ORDINANCE NO. 11, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Mr. Johnson stated Staff is recommending more information be placed in . J the ordinance about the duties of the Commission, plus do general housekeeping of the ordinance to make it flow properly_ The Commission discussed the following: '. / 1 ., / , \ \ \ --) _.J - " - . - . - .: ~ ~ = i -" C e = ~. .... DC oW :.!;,,) II~C ~- ~- .-- ..,-- .. D.. .- ...-11- ~. =r.~ -.. -Ii c:. .~ ~~.= ~~ .,< C. .; .7i ~! .- "':. ='5.: :!~ w- D. E': _0 Do_O- Z_ ~: .... "0-- .....- ... ..... Q*A; 1 !" 1: 20 I C 2 10" U :0 I C 3 - 12 :IA 10 C 'tO~SBIP OF GlLOW OJlJ)n:~"lC1: NO. ~ AA ordin"''' rccu1atld the QU.... I1tT. "ualltT and ~ of _tuw,s W1ed fer: bUUclmC constnlel1on ...d .e=C eerWn eona=CUOll .....d. ar<lS. 'rhe To- BOUl! of Gro'" d_ orel"'" : A. )laurlala 1. 1nS1llatlou _\erl&1 W1ed fer: the -p1"'O'leC'tlCJ1::1. 01 a iJuilc1Ul1 a~ boat ...d eolel shaJ1 tie ~ecl upOn -0,. 'the ~ct.Ora :. Stueeo on me outSide of traXDe bUUcun,s shall be O~ !Datal mdh W&1rtunr 'Dot leIS 1bAD 3.41 -po\JDc1S per &elua." ,..rd.. aDd. an,. o~e.r plaStC _ II huell,. prol>1bnecl- _~~"NO 'oul1d\1lC 'PA~ 01 ...,. lI:lDd ana- .. 'De used. tot' "Ute J.3~eJ11, OUU1DC amsn on aza b . 4. All 'oUlldIDC 1r\aterlals allall tie c: ,_004 QU."Utl'. CODfonruAl1.0 Ie.- .ralJ~ accep'le4 SlaDc1&rc1S. z:zecP\ as ot.he~e proY'lOed. '1'11 laC'. 0: lD th1S code. or m CSul,. l'TOIDw.raucS rc~tlons. tile epeeiAC&U"" 01 the "",en"" SOCletY tor Tes=f )la- 1.&".1.15 01" other rue.raU,. a~'Pted S\.IoDI1&rC1S . ~ eq1J.a1 value.. shAll 'De deernecl u> tie cenorall3' a_pte4- $. AU materials used. U .I~ptt 1n the t:\1.XU1C of eoncrete snall be clean &Dd tree tt'Om lOam &D~ other loJ'tlrn Jna t.\U. S. Mi]C'tU%tS tor eoncret.l &hall be as follows: pUn: co~ou:n: - 1 'PArt portl...e cement. 0< eQual. 3 p..... Sauel. , parts Gravel. ~'TOJlCI:P CO~~ - 1 'Pan. po1"t1J.ud. Ce.meD\. or equal. : pa.nl SaDd. ~ par<l Gravel. -V:A-rrR c:O~~-: - ~ct 'lftore than j ~ ,.UoDS of water par 'ba& ot eetneD't. ~. StrUcmu1 neel ad \TOn shall com'P1Y with the recommeDOI1.1ons o! 'tne Anlenc&n lDSUtUte of Steel CODSU'Uetlou. I. Sot': woocl Iwn<>e~ sDaJ1 ",eet the rradJnl' nQUlftIncnu at we ,.,SSOct.at1on reeo~d m the trade as covenne tne. species under wnos. rral:1lJ1C rules tt ..as produced. ThlS reQU1re.meDt shall DOl. applY to mill- work: 0:' sntU10r fU1ish. 9, J,.um'oer .nall be. 4n" anel ",ell seasonec.. 3. A. J'0U%lel.t10U ..alIs allall N" aeroSl &Del unC1U all ,ual. ooo.t' o'Pe1UD's. :cxcepUOA: Fo\1Zlc1auaD. wallJ ~ exPOsad. on the msu11' or extendm.f _ not more tha.n ~'\.. courses ))elO- rrac1e m&7 be cd eicl1' ,.,ell' \1") tnlcl<Doss. . 11. Ace_o"," 'oul1ll1nP tna,. 'oe constNC'tecl upOu a 1I00=C sla II or othU approved j;OlJJ:1c1.1uon on .,oil tteC o!' orpzUc mauna! when 'DO~ cs~ ~1O ."uar& faet ,., ..... 4. A. l"OU%lelatlons ...el 1J>IUlatlou: Where cnwl rpacel art used, me JrOuDl1Snall be leveled. anc1 CO".ced. with a .va~or ban"C:' UAlUS o'Den \0 '\be 'bUe...-neDt aDd. beated.. The per=etu 01 lUell Slla- shall tie juul&tecl ..ntll .,. jDIUIatlOll unper- "<nOUS \0 D\olSNJ"C &Ad. ..nth a JIUAi- zn"'" 01 ona ",ell. \1-1 .tl1ielmaaa. B. C....een.sla'o 1I00n tor ruI' aenet eoO" aD rraa.t snan be: ua- suiatecl w,tIl ",atU>allUlpe1"'flOWl to lI\olSt\1" aul! a mJ1U1Dlaft'l at OIl- ,.,ell \1-\ wclC>-' Tlt>S Utsulatlon InaU a",...d a """"""", 01 11" be1o.... the surface of 'U2,& ~OOf at tIla pen1rIetc of wel floor. C. noon 01 aUAellall ranCes U> be _. 1DUJ,="U%f\ 01 4" beloW' aDY UVUlf area 1\00:' 5. !;ven' elweUlnC Ilouse Ilereaftc erected. txe<<pt ~no$t consu-u-cted on a "'... 'feJ.D1oreea. concrete sU'D ShaD. tiUler ba...e a 'DaSaneAt ot aD excavated ,.paee 'UDder tne G- tlTO lint lloor at lUSt ....0 (21 feat in de1>tl1. o~ lUell nuild\DC 111&11 tie elevated abOve U\e JtO\I%l.d aD 'that tnef't!: ",ill 'De . clear all' IJlIICt of at. }e~ twO c:\ tHt between the lOP 01 'the rrounc1 and. tne bOttom o! the flOCI' lOlSU. Such spaees in al~ cases 'be enclosed. 'Du't ~ro"'c1ed. ..--sm am-ple veD.WaUOU Pc. proper- lY ctra1Jlecl. 6.. 1n aU cUltS where b&J&II'It.D'lS are cQDS':Ncte~ in ~UDd w!\lcb eoDu.1J1I 'Waur. cuiuo1e 'Pt"OVUlODS lnall lie ",ad' to pr1>pcl,. carr1 of! the tn01SWfe !rOm. sucn IOu.. ':'. A11ean twO (2., f~da1:iOD ".11 venu ~V\nC a ~ow. encct area of one square loot 'tor ear:h ~~en lmul teet of eXttno!' w&ll shall be 1DSu.Ued. in ..e.""\ bAlctne.ntless space. Ve.n\s shall 'be ClOvueli 'With 1:-1" mesh noneofTOCUble ~enUl&:. vent- UlI' 1S 110'1. reQl,UJ'cd ..,nen k>&SCl'T'eDt- less space 15 open to a venti1&"C 'tla.5ement. I. 'Basement o!' cell;.!" nODT' Ilabs shaU not be less: th~ ~ee t3l men concrete ~ nzushcd. monoUUUC: om.,...nse tnrCe (3\ inch coDe"te ano ODe (1) men '\Oppml. '-9. wooel posts ID .halement swl 'bIU:' on a cement baSe whicn snall e.xtend. not less: tDP tau:' (") mchu abOve \he fnnshed. 1\001" which In turn shan Test on tOP of a eonae'le fOOunr at least 2'" bY 2". '0,. a". ToP of posu snaU 'be securely taS'L- enec!. 'to 'the (1rCers. lei. 'Bue.ments ,;,h.al! be ~rO"'loec!. w.-=:h mUns 0: 11':t.':. anc ....e.."'l.tUatlOr. o! not leSS tnan t'A'0 :pe:-e~n::. (2r;:'c J o! the f\00:' area.. 1~. 'Beam t.lllnC will 'be reautred. around an va,erior Cl'Pe.:01nl'S ~:-. ma.sonr~. venee'!" wa.Us and. aU lnter. secuons 01 ,,",ooC and. muonr-'. ~:. An acCUF open1nr of not \rSS th...:'\ 18" oy :2".'. 0':' lb eo\l1,,'a\e'n~. ..nall be ~ro"'lde~ 'to eac:n Ca5t:me:'1"- ieU S:l:ac:e ,,;nce.:- wcoe. II: IrleUi t\oo'!" CCr.str.:ctl0n. 1:. "nle waUs c! ch!JnDeTS u.acd tar noves. raJ1ta. ~t'C~laee".s. beat- 1%11 ~. or otber beaun.1 ap. pllances us1AC tuel otller tl1arI t.1' o~. natunl ps anall lie 'oWlt o~ bndt. ~:Dcre\e.. 6tOne.! 0: hOUOW tne 01 1Ucl1 th1elCl- .,.d cottJtr1le- UOI1 II II h~ ~ecl. 14. 14etal'oaSUl"'! ~e1I .....,. be uaecl ..ntll ~Nr-l .,.el t.:P Cas. U. SoUd 'oriel< or """crew chl=' Deya al1aJ1 uo' be I_ thai> tour I ~ I Ulell.d UJ1e1< csc1ualft 01 ~ue UDiAC. A .....cl1T'i aide 'oriel< laid lIa..".e shaU be Il"",ecl U> tulllII UWI requ>ram....' tor brlCl< -- -ya. lL SUlIle anll bOU- tlJe cl1lZrI- De". al1aJ1 lla"e a mi%1lJDUDl thlcl<' n_ crt eJSl1' I) Ulell.u. 1':. BoUo<< t1le maY be uae4 111. tile """"""~ crt a .-eT 01l1Y ....here aa1d ~eT II par\ 01 aD _or tlJe _all. 11. 'rhe toUDdatlnu of aD cstOrlll1" _eT .l1&ll stan bal- \ba -"' 1m&. 11. 1%1 =e 'oul1diDJ1. tha cll.lnt. De,. shaJ1 u.ra'" be iNUt U_ \be rro=el ul> or res' upOA \be - roeJ1'1.""aJls.. :0. ChlftlDe". .11a11 be 'oUllt at lean 'three C31 feet abOvc fta1. roots aDd. ~o (:) tee.\ a bOve 'the rtdZeI 01 peal<ecl rooU. n. 1.rOn bTaeKeu 0: st1rNl'I at. tached U> wood'" eousU"'el10U aA&ll n.. tie ""ec1 U> .,.ppOrt _ey&. =- ClUJ'DDeyI a}\aU -DOt rest U1)O. wooden ~oon, be&DIS or ~ndCeu o~ lie llUUC ='" ....oocl.... ra!tUS Ul _'1 llu>lclmC. 23. All chl:m"e'" sllan be pro"ul1' cappe~ W'1th &11 approved. =atUi&1- 2~. corbalecl cblJlUleY' ",ust .... IUPpO"eel ll,. a ....aJ1 ..rtU a znl1li- 1r\"'" uucJCIl- al TWelve (12) lDcl>es. :l. All corl:>e1lnC shall not ,;rolact more man a1X (6) 1,Dches tram U1e lace of an" waD.. 21. Cor'oell%1C ,Ilall eonstrt of at least ~V. (5) .coursd 01 brlck. :':. Tne use of . smoke. pipe "ther Ul- I clU%D'ley sb,aU tie proll.1'oltecl. 21. 1'10 ..ooclen 'oO&'I1S. jolsU or Taf'ten sh&ll De ~laeed. w1UW1 'tWo (%) =ehes of the ouuifle ta" of · cn.:mne~ wnetDCT' 1t be tor s:tnokt., a1.: I or for an,.. oULcr purpose.. 29. 1'1 0 wooclwo~1< slt&U be 1>Iacecl ,.'1= toU: (~l lDcI1d of the t>aclt ....aJ1 01 ~ llrepl&CO. 3C- 'nle ""cis of all ..ood lOIlU ...el 'oe1Ut\l IUPpOruel II,. bnCI< ,..aU& snall be ~re c:ut.. 3':.. The 1\oor constr\1CQon of aU o.,.,eu.~t hOUSes snall be buUt to .u,S'taln a llve load. 01 DOl. less than !O~ f 40' poundS pet SQuare toot.. hl:. :-oofs shaU be acsts:Dcc1 to SUl>- 'Po~ a. rt".:.n.J,mU1T\ at toro. '40) ~c1s per' ."uart 100t ",ul 1Jve Z:. AU ftoo:' )011\1 sha~ nave a ~a.:-:.nl' o:! Dot leSS than toU!' (4.l 1,Dc::.es a~ eae.."\ enC o! tne. wall or bea...'":'l. s'U?por':ml sa.:nr aDc.. nO wood. ~oc-: )OlS'"..S shall be leSS m s.ue tn.an :.. ~~. e", O:D~ s'Paced. more tn~ n:neen (16', lncnes on centeT'S. 10. APproved buUt UP roollnC. ver. Uea.l. or ed-Ie rr:aJn ..004 shu::L,les. tnU1eral surlaeec.. asbes\DS, slate Of t'nCU' eqUivalent Will b& accepwc.. 1~. ~&D.S f~ attacl"Jnf !'Oo! cov- erUlC sl1al1 lie coPpc or bot-cl1ppad .alvan1%&d. uailS. 1:. Ta:' paper is herebY 'Prohibited 1.oT' use as T'oo~ eoverml matltnal OD TOots o~ aU oUlldinCS, wlth the u. CC-ptlOJ:l. ot un m bWlt-l1P roots. B. COI1Sa'UcUOl1 ':.. ~o cwellinf shaU be coJ:1SU"Uct. ec' upon any 10UDc1auar... the :toO\.. me o~ wkUcn is leSS UO&I:. three and one.nal! 13~ 1 fed 'oeJ.o~' cnQe. unlesS bui1~ u~Otl solle!. TOC:~' atld no 100tmf shall rest \1'Pon ~Ued. or loos.e ea..rtl'- :. ^~1 'bul1dinU shall 'nlve ~o\JT\d.- nor. ""al.i5 o! bncio>.. stOne: 0; eon- c:re.~e.. 'Q~ S".l.."!lclet:': S\:e 0':" S':.Tt:n2t:-. to s",J~t)o1"'t. trJe v."eu:n~ ~--n'Po!eci. ~tU1- unurr. reCl.Ul.remen~ Are: CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION February 18. 1997 DATE AGENDA Non~~~n N:l ()G, ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED ,/ r/ FOR AGEHDA PI"",,"," ;; L 1// BY: Jeff Johmoo V(II/. ITEM N:l Adopt Ordinance No. lIE (To Repeal Ordinance No. II) REQUEST The City Council is asked to adopt Ordinance lIE. As proposed, this ordinance (An Ordinance Establishing a Planning and Zoning Commission and Setting Out the Composition and Their Duties) would be deleted. For further information, please refer to the November 12, 1996 and January 14, 1997 Planning and Zoning Commission minutes. '\ . -~ MOTION BY: SECOND BY: I I . / . I CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. lIE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 11, ADOPTED THE II TH DAY OF APRIL, 1972, KNOWN AS AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DUTIES THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: Ordinance No. 11 is hereby amended as follows: Ordinance No. 11, adopted April 11, 1972, Ordinance No. lIA adopted February 4, 1973, Ordinance No. lIB adopted August 19, 1975, Ordinance No. lIC adopted April 18, 1978 and Ordinance No.IID adopted June 21,1988 are hereby repealed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this _ day of 1997. ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER Victoria Volk, City Clerk J. E. McKelvey, Mayor CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION February 18, 1997 DATE AGENDA Non~~~n r-.o. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA ITEM r-.o. Adopt Ordinance No. 202 Establishing a Planning and Zoning Commission...... Planning Jeff Johnson BY: REQUEST The City Council is asked to review and adopt Ordinance No 202 - An Ordinance Establishing a Planning and Zoning Commission and Setting Out the Composition and Their Duties. Please advise staff in regards to any reeommended or proposed changes. \ , J " , ,/ MOTION BY: SECOND BY: / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 202 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND SETTING OUT THE COMPOSITION AND THEIR DUTIES THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Andover does hereby ordain: Section I. Generally. The City Council perfonns the duties and exercises the powers of administrative boards or commissions. However, the City Council may establish boards or commissions as set forth in this ordinance to investigate subjects or to perform quasi-judicial functions. Additional administrative boards or commissions shall be established as required by law or for the administration of a municipal function jointly shared with another political subdivision. Section 2 Establishment ofPlanninl: and Zoninl: Commission. , ) The Planning and Zoning Commission is established pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Planning Act, and has the powers and duties assigned to it by that Act and by this ordinance, State law and the Charter. Section 3. Membership and Composition. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consist of seven (7) members whom are residents of the City. The members shall be appointed at large and may be removed by a majority vote by the City Council. Members of the Commission are appointed by the City Council for staggered terms of three (3) years, expiring January 1st of each year. Original and successive appointees shall hold their offices until their successors are appointed and qualified. Vacancies during a term shall be filled by the City Council for the unexpired portion of the term. All members shall serve with compensation as established by City Council resolution. The City attorney, engineering, community development, planning and building department staff shall attend meetings of the Planning and Zoning Commission in an advisory capacity at the request of the Chairperson. Section 4. Absences. , / Three (3) consecutive unexcused Planning and Zoning Commission meeting absences of a member shall constitute an automatic resignation from office. A leave of absence for medical reasons in excess of two (2) consecutive meetings may be granted at the / discretion of the Chairperson for up to three (3) months, inclusive of consecutive time away from duties, at which time the leave shall be reviewed and the member may be diseharged. Section 5. Officers: Meetin~s. The Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the Planning and Zoning Commission are appointed by the City Council, for a two (2) year term. All members of the Commission may vote on all questions before the Commission. No member of the Commission may vote on any question in which the member is directly or indirectly interested. The Commission shall hold at least two (2) regular meetings on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month. The Commission shall hold as many additional meetings per month as the City Councilor Commission shall deem necessary. The Commission shall determine by rules, the date and time of its meetings and shall set such public hearings as are neeessary and desirable or required by law or ordinance. Records of resolutions, transactions, and findings shall be a public record. Section 6. Powers and Duties. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall have the powers and duties allowed under / the Charter and State law. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this day of 1997. ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER Victoria Volk, City Clerk 1. E. McKelvey, Mayor , / Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 14, 1997 Page 2 / (Review Ordinances - Ordinance No. 200, Moving of Buildings, Continued) Commissioner Wells was concerned about the height of a building and the safety of the moving equipment. She proposed the movers submit proof that the equipment has been inspected recently. Mr. Johnson stated other ordinance provisions regulate the height requirements. The movers must be licensed by the state, so the safety questions are addressed by the state. The other Commissions agreed it would not be necessary to add further requirements for the movers. The Commissioners were comfortable with the ordinance as proposed, though the items under Section 3 must be corrected to be in numerical order. ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 201, REGULATING MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS Mr. Johnson explained the intent is to repeal Ordinance 6 and adopt the redrafted Ordinance 201. The new ordinance is in line with those ordinances of Ham Lake and Ramsey. He briefly reviewed the sections of the ordinance, noting this only applies to manufactured home parks. If a manufactured home is placed on a single family lot, the single family lot regulations would apply. / Commissioner Barry suggested the sentence in Section 4 be amended to state, "The owner of the manufactured home park shall furnish a copy of covenants, restrictions, and by-laws of the manufactured home park to the City." The Commission agreed. There were no further comments. ~ ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE 202, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Mr. Johnson explained Ordinance 11 would be repealed and replaced with Ordinance 202. In reviewing the proposed ordinance, the following comments and recommended changes were made: Section 3, Membership and Composition: Change "shall consist of seven members from the City" to "shall consist of seven residents from the City" . There was some question as to whether a provision on membership should be that the member be an eligible voter. There was no consensus for that change. Commissioner Wells wondered if consideration had been given to having minor representation or student members, though they would not vote. After discussion, the Commission noted that is sometimes done for councils or school boards, but they were not aware of such members serving on commissions. There was no consensus for that idea. .' Section 4, Absences: The Commission discussed the issue of absences. A concern raised by Commissioner Wells is when only two members show up " for a :neeting and there are important items to consider, which happened / once last year. Possibly there should be some provision for the person who will be absent to fax or mail their opinion on the items. Commissioner Apel stated there is always that problem when dealing with Regular Planning and zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 14, 1997 Page 3 , , / (Review Ordinances - Ordinance No. 202, Planning and zoning Commission, Con tinued) appointed, basically volunteer, positions. He felt common sense must prevail. Commissioners can contact City Staff now with their opinion on any agenda item if they cannot attend a meeting. It doesn't have to be made part of the ordinance. It was then suggested that possibly a quorum should be required to prevent the situation noted by Commissioner Wells. But in further discussion, it was noted that there is very seldom less than a quorum present and that attendance has not been a major problem. The consensus was to amend the first line to "Three consecutive unexcused Planning and Zoning Commission meeting absences..." With that change, determine whether would be required. they have resolved with attendance. Chairperson Squires suggested the Council be asked there are problems such that alternative language He has observed that where there have been problems, themselves and that there is not an on-going problem ,~ , Section 5, Officers, Meetings: Mr. Johnson stated as written the intent would be that the Commission would make a recommendation for Chairperson and Vice Chairperson, subj ect to City Council approval. There was considerable discussion on this item, as Commissioners Apel, Peek and Luedtke did not feel the Commission should be involved in that decision. There was a concern that it could create factions, and they felt the procedure of a recommendation by the Mayor has worked well. They preferred staying with the current method of selection. Commissioners Barry and Wells felt that a secret ballot could be taken to nominate the Chair and Vice Chair, or some method used to provide input that would not be confrontational. Chairperson Squires leaned toward giving the Council total discretion for the appointments; however, when this is presented to the Council, he suggested Staff inform them of this discussion that a majority are in favor of leaving the practice as is but there is some sentiment to giving the Planning Commission some input. There were no further comments on the proposed ordinance. ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 203, SEWER SERVICE/RESERVE CAPACITY COSTS Mr. Johnson explained the proposal is to repeal Ordinance No. 13 and replace it with Ordinance No. 203. There are no major changes in the new ordinance other than updating Section 4 relating to penalties. The Building Official 'and City Engineer are comfortable with the ordinance as proposed. The Commission discussed the SAC charges but recommended no changes. I Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 12, 1996 Page 5 . / LOT SPLIT/VARIANCE - 17841 BLUEBIRD STREET NW - CONTINUED Mr. Hinzman reported the Zoning Ordinance was adopted October 21, 1970. The plat for the area including Bluebird Street was recorded December 9, 1971, about one year into the present zoning Ordinance. Commissioner Luedtke stated the lot in question is large compared to the other ones, but he would be opposed to a lot split because someone wants to build a new house in a development that requires 2.5-acre lots. He did not see the hardship. Commissioner Peek stated because the property was platted after the adoption of the ordinance, the issue of grandfathering does not apply. From his perspective, the question becomes does the degree of thE'! variance alter the other quantities and qualities of the neighborhood. He felt the magnitude of the variance does impact it. Commissioner Wells noted from the public testimony of existing neighbors definitely opposing this and that the granting of the request might create more problems in the neighborhood, she too - is against it. Chairperson Squires stated in looking at the standards the City has in the ordinance and the hardship required when dealing with variances, it comes down to whether there is a reasonable use of the property without the variance. There is nothing that suggests any factors that there would be an undue hardship created if the variance wasn't granted. The only thing that would have been significant to him is if this plat would have predated the ordinance. That is not the case here. " MOTION by Wells, Seconded by Peek, to recommend denial to the City Council of the lot split and variance at 17841 Bluebird Street NW for the following reasons: 1) Lack of evidentiary hardship according to lot use; 2) possible drainage problem with the drain field of the septic .system; 3) public testimony of adjacent neighbors were definitely against it as recorded for the public hearing; 4) denial of the variance does not preclude reasonable use of the property; and 5) granting the variance would have significant impact on the locale, namely that the size of the newly created parcels would not be consistent with the neighborhood pattern. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Apel, Barry, Putnam) vote. This will be on the December 3, 1996, City Council agenda. 8:10 p.m. DISCUSSION - REVIEW OF ORDINANCE NO.7, MATERIALS USED FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Mr. Johnson stated the Building Official has reviewed this ordinance and recommends that it be removed entirely because all of the information given is also in the Uniform Building Code. The Commission agreed. ~ " DISCUSSION - REVIEW OF ORDINANCE NO. 11, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION , J Mr. Johnson stated Staff is recommending more information be placed in the ordinance about the duties of the Commission, plus do general housekeeping of the ordinance to make it flow properly. The Commission discussed the following: Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 12, 1996 Page 6 \.. /1 (Discussion - Review of Ordinance 11, Planning and Zoning Commission, Continued) Section 1, subdivision 1, note the City Attorney, engineering, planning and building. inspector shall attend meetings at the request of the Chairperson. It was suggested that provision remain. Section 1, Subdivision 2, was adopted when the Planning Commission was created. After that, it doesn't specify the terms of office. It has been the understanding that each term is for three years. That should be specified. Section 2, appointment of chairperson for a term of one year. The term should be consistent with Council policy, which has been to serve two- year terms. Also, make the ordinance gender neutral. Because the Chairperson is no longer required to attend all regular Council meeting, that sentence should be deleted. Section 3. Commissioner Wells expressed a desire to see something more on this issue to avoid having only two or three Commissioners at a meeting. Possibly when a Commissioner is going to be absent, he/she should provide comments to the Staff on the agenda items. No change was recommended. Section 4. Mr. Johnson stated the thought was to list the duties of the Commission. Chairperson Squires stated the Section references Minnesota 1965, Chapter 670. That may be outdated and should be updated to include only a reference to the name of the statute. The State Statute also talks about the powers and duties of the Planning Commission. Chairperson Squires stated most other cities have a Board of Appeals and Adjustments that deals with variances. He has never seen a process like that of Andover, as typically a separate body handles variances and appeals from determinations made by Staff. He doesn't disagree it may make some sense to have this body involved, but State law says the final authority over the granting of variances has to be done by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. Maybe the City Council can be designated that Board. He suggested Staff look into that and consult with the City Attorney. Possibly something must be added to the ordinance to allow the Commission to do what it is doing. Or possibly the City Council, given the growth of the City, wants to have the Planning and Zoning Commission be the final authority over variances. Discussion was also on the appointment process of Commissioners. That process has changed over the years from interviews by the Council, to interviews by the Commission, to no interviews at all. The general feeling was that applicants should be interviewed prior to appointment to the Commission. Generally, the Commissioners stated they would be receptive to interviewing the applicants, then make a recommendation to \ the City Council. While there was some discussion on the requirements J to become a Commissioner, the general feeling was that the only qualification is that the person be a resident. That point is not mentioned in the ordinance and probably should be. CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 11 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND SETTING OUT THE COMPOSITION AND DUTIES THEREOF. The Andover City Council does ordain: SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMISSION. A City Planning and zoning Commission for the City of Andover is hereby established. SUBDIVISION 1. COMPOSITION. The Planning and zoning Commission shall consist of seven (7) members. The members shall be appointed by the City Council and may be removed at any time by a majority vote of the City Council. The City attorney, engineer, planner and building inspector shall attend meetings of the Planning and zoning Commission in an advisory capacity at the request of the chairman. SUBDIVISION 2. TERMS OF OFFICE. Of the members of the Commission first appointed, three (3) shall be appointed for a term of one (1) year, two (2) for a term of two (2) years and two (2) for a term of (3) three years. Terms shall expire on January 1. Original and successive appointees shall hold their offices until their successors are appointed and qualified. Vacancies during a term shall be filled by the City Council for the unexpired portion of the term. Every appointed member shall, before entering upon the discharge of his duties, take an oath that he will faithfully discharge the duties of his office. All membe.rs shall serve with such compensation as may be set from time to time by resolution of the City Council. (llA, 2-4-75) SUBDIVISION 3. ABSENCES. Three (3) consecutive unexcused absences of a member from duly called Commission meetings shall constitute automatic resignation from office. Determination that an absence is unexcused shall be in the discretion of the Commission Chairman. (llC, 4-18-78) \ / SECTION 2. ORGANIZATION MEETINGS, ETC. The City Council shall appoint a cha1rman from among the appointed members for a term of one (1) year; the Commission may create and fill such other offices as it may deem necessary for its own administration. The Commission Chairman or his designated representative shall attend all regular City Council meetings. SECTION 3. REGULAR MEETINGS. The Commission shall hold at least two (2) regular meet1ngs on the second (2nd) and (4th) fourth Tuesday of each month. The Commission shall hold as many aQditional meetings per month as the City Councilor Commission shall deem necessary. It shall adopt rules for the transactions of business and shall keep a record of its resolutions, transactions, and findings; said record shall be a public record. / Except where different time requirements are specified in Andover City Ordinances, the agenda items from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held on the second (2nd) Tuesday, shall be scheduled for the City Council on their first (1st) Tuesday meeting of the following month; and the items from the Planning and zoning Commission meeting held on the fourth (4th) Tuesday shall be scheduled for the City Council on their third (3rd) Tuesday meeting of the following month. (lIB, 8-19-75; 110, 6-21- 88) SECTION 4. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION. The Planning Commission shall be the City Planning Agency and shall have the powers and duties given such agency generally by Laws of Minnesota 1965, Chapter 670. It shall also exercise the duties conferred upon it by this Ordinance. SECTION 5. PLATTING AND ZONING. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall carry out such functions and duties as are assigned to it under the provisions of the City of Andover Ordinance No. 8 relating to zoning and No. 10 relating to platting. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication as provided by law. Passed by the Andover city Council this 11th day of April, 1972. CITY OF ANDOVER / /s/ Richard Schneider Richard Schneider, Chairman ATTEST: /s/ Mary West Mary West, Clerk 11A, 2-04-75 lIB, 8-19-75 11C, 4-18-78 110, 6-21-88 / Page 2 , J CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. llA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 11 ADOPTED APRIL 11, 1972, AND ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNING AND ZONING COHMI5S1 k.~D SETTING OUT THE COl1POSITION AND DUTIES THEREOF." SECTION 1. The following Subdivision of Ordinance Number 11, adopted on A?ril 11, 1972 and entitled "AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANIHUG AND ZONIHG COMMISSION AND SETTING OUT THE COHPOSITION AND DUTIES THEREOF" is amended to read as follows: / Subdivision 2. TEID1S OF OFFICE. Of the members of the Cornnission first appointed, three shall be appointed for a ter~ of one year, two for a term of two years and two for a term of three years. Terms shall expire on January 1. Original and successive appointees shall hold their offices until their successors are appointed and qualified. Vacancies during a term shall be filled by the Town Board for the unexpired portion of the term. Every appointed member shall, before entering upon the discharge of his duties, take an oath that he will faithfully discharge the duties of his. office. All ~embers shall serve with such compensation as may be set from time to time by resolution of the Town Board. Passed by the City Council this J-f .~ effective from and by law. day of :t.{'PY1MLL1\.l...1 d- after SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become its passage and publication as required , 1975. CITY OF ANDOVER 1/ / n .1c..~ ~ r€< .[r~..A //1 \. '.~ Richard s~rne~der, Mayor ,,,/ ATT,T: ~0d~ Arthur JV '\ / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDL~CE NO. IlB AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 11. ADOPTED APRIL 11, 1972, AND ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MID SETTING OUT THE COMPOSITION AND DUTIES THEREOF". SECTIJN 1. The following subdivision of Ordinance No. 11, adopted on April 11, 1972, and entit led "AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING :\ PLANNING AND ZONING CO}!MISSION A1~ SETTING OUT TrIE COMPOSITION AND DUTIES THEREOF" is amended to read as follows: 3ECTION 3 - REGULAR MEETINGS. The Commission sl-all hold at le~st t~o (2) regular meetings on the second and fourti Tuesday of each month. The Commission shall hold as many additio~al meetings per reonth JS the City Councilor Commission shall deem ne~ess~ry. It shall adopt rules for the transactions of business and shall keep a record of its resolutions, transactions, and findings; said record shall be a ,lUblic record. The agenda items from the Plan'ling and Zoning Co~~ission mep.ting held on the second Tuesday, shaLL be scheduled for the City Council on their first Tuesday meeting of th~ followin~ month; and the items from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held en the fourth Tuesday shall be scheduled for the City Council on their third Tuesday meeting of the following month. J SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective fr~m and after its passa~e and publication as required by lau. Passed by the City Council on this ~ day of AURtlSt , 1975. CITY OF ANDOVER Richard J. Sch~eider - Mayor ATTEST: .-.-~-. . ..' ") i/j " // : .-, I ,.. //..' / / c1- ...~ , ~ , . ". - .,./..! /' . ~.J-+- '.~4>.v..,-?j Patrida ':. L'i'ndqd~f Clerk!Tre:sure.- {/ .' " / \ , J CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. llC AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 11, AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND SETTING OUT THE COMPOSITION AND DUTIES THEREOF. BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER: The following subsection shall be added to Section 1. of Ordinance No. 11: Subdivision 3. ABSENCES. Three consecutive unexcused absences of a member from duly called Commission meetings shall constitute automatic resignation from office. Determination that an absence is unexcused shall be in the discretion of the Commission Chairman. , ; / Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 18th day of April , 1978. ATTEs<R) " /. ' -~. ,~-<-,? '-- /'.. '.', -, ---:' \ AJ_ .,t.-:, '. ".-1 Patricia'K: Lindqui;t; City Clerk .' \ / . , / CITY OF ANDIVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. lID AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 11, AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION and SETTING OUT THE COMPOSITION AND DUTIES THEREOF BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER: The following subsection shall be amended: . I Section 3. Regular Meetings. The Commission shall hold at least two (2) regular meetings on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month. The Commission shall hold as many additional meetings per month as the City Councilor Commission shall deem necessary. (paragraph break added fot cIa ri ty) . It shall adopt rules for the transactions of business and shall keep a tecord of its resolutions, transactions, and findings; said record shall be.a public record. (Paragraph break added for clariti') Bxcept where diffetcnt time requirements ate specified in Andovcr city OrdInances, the agenda items from the Planning & Zoning - Commission meeting held on the second Tuesday, shall be scheduled .for the City Council on theiL first Tuesday meeting of the following month; and tha items from the Planning & zoning Commission meeting held on the fourth Tuesday shall be scheduled fer the City Council on their third Tuesday meeting of the following month. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this ?l~~ day of .Tllnp , 1988. '-'-)/- ;iJe.try ,,. , I ,c"' ,- winds~hltf, ~ayor ATTEST: ,I; \- ;' I '.,. .;("'.u.... j) -' L.. Victoria volk, City Clerk .' I / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL AcrION DATE Ff'hnmcy 1 R 1 QQ7 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED f\O. N on-Discussion (iJtlY FOR AGENDA ITEM f\O. BY: Adopt Ordinance No. 13C Planning ~. (To Repeal Ordinance No. 13) Jeff Johnson REQUEST The City Council is asked to adopt Ordinance 13C. As proposed, this ordinance (An Ordinance Establishing Sewer Service Availability and Connection Charge to Pay Reserve Costs of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission) would be deleted. , J For further information, please refer to the November 12, 1996 and January 14, 1997 Planning and Zoning Commission minutes. , ) MOTION BY: SECOND BY: . l CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 13C AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 13, ADOPTED THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1973, KNOWN AS AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SEWER SERVICE AVAILABILITY AND CONNECTION CHARGE TO PAY RESERVE CAPACITY COSTS OF THE METROPOLITAN SEWER BOARD. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: Ordinance No. 13 is hereby amended as follows: Ordinance No. 13, adopted January 9, 1973, Ordinance No. 13B adopted February 2, 1988 and Ordinance No. 13A adopted December 20, 1977 are hereby repealed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this _ day of 1997. , J ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER Victoria Volk, City Clerk 1. E. McKelvey, Mayor , J CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION February 18, 1997 DATE AGENDA Non~~9.MJn t-O. ITEM t-O. Adopt Ordinance No. 203 Establishing Sewer Service Availability and Connection Charge to Pay Reserve Costs of the MWCC ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning ( r Jeff Johnson !J ~ vfJ APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: c5A. REQUEST The City Council is asked to review and adopt Ordinance No 203 . An Ordinance Establishing Sewer Service Availability and Connection Charge to Pay Reserve Capacity Costs of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Please advise staff in regards to any recommended or proposed changes , , MOTION BY: SECOND BY: j CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 203 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SEWER SERVICE AVAILABILITY AND CONNECTION CHARGE TO PAY RESERVE CAPACITY COSTS OF THE METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION. The City Council of the City of Andover does hereby ordain: Section I. Recitals '\0... / The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has determined to reserve unused capacity in the metropolitan disposal system each year eommeneing in 1973 for local government units in which new buildings to be connected to the system and new connections to the system are connected during such year; and to allocate the debt service costs of such unused capacity for the year among such local government units as provided in Metropolitan Sewer Board Resolution 72-225 and Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Resolution 77-193. In order for the City to pay such costs allocated to it each year, it will be necessary to establish sewer service availability and connection charges for all buildings to be constructed or connected to the metropolitan disposal system on or after January I, 1973, Section 2. Establishment of Charges. For the purposes of paying costs of reserve capacity allocated to the City each year by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, there is hereby established a charge for: a. The availability of treatment works and interceptors comprising the metropolitan disposal system, and b. Connections, direct and indirect, to the metropolitan disposal system. , / The charge is imposed on each building or strueture in that portion of the City of Andover lying within Metropolitan Waste Control Commission District Number 2 and each connection to the metropolitan disposal system directly or through the City's system, construction of which is commenced on or after January 1, 1973. The charge shall be payable upon the issuanee of a building permit or a connection permit, whichever shall come first. The charge for each building or structure shall be equal to the number of units of sewage volume which it shall discharge multiplied by $275 for 1973, $300 fOf 1974, $325 for 1975, $350 for 1976, $375 for 1977, $400 for 1978 and $425 for 1979. The charge for future years will be set by council resolution per the Metropolitan Waste Control \ J Commission's directive (Ordinance No. 13 - 13A, 12-20-77; 13B, 2-2-88). A unit of sewage volume shall be 100,000 gallons per year and shall be assigned as follows: a. Single family houses, townhouses and duplex units shall each comprise one unit; b. Condominiums and apartments shall each comprise 80% of a unit; c. Mobile homes shall each eomprise 80% of a unit; d. Other buildings and structures shall be assigned one unit for each 100,000 gallons for flow or part thereof which it is estimated they will discharge; e. Public housing units and housing units subsidized under any federal program for low and moderate income housing shall be counted at 75% of the unit equivalent for that type of housing; f. Units existing or for which building permits were issued prior to January I, 1973, shall be counted as one-half the unit equivalent for that type of housing, if connected to the Metropolitan Disposal System prior to January I, 1974, and shall be counted at the full rate thereafter. Section 3. Administration. The City Building Official or their designee shall prepare or revise building permit or sewage connection permit application forms to provide information necessary for the computation of the number of units assignable to the building or structure in question, and shall collect the applicable charge before issuance of a permit. The Building Official shall make such information available to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission upon request. Of upon filing a report covering such permit with the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, the Commission determines that a greater number of units is assignable to the building or structure in question, any additional amount of eost alloeated to the City as a result shall be paid by the person or company to whom the permit was granted. J ". / \ ) " , ; Section 4. Penalty. Any person who violates any provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to applicable fines and imprisonment defmed by State law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this _ day of 1997. A TIEST: CITY OF ANDOVER Victoria Volk, City Clerk J. E. McKelvey, Mayor , ) @ , / Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 14, 1997 Page 3 (Review Ordinances - Ordinance No. 202, Planning and Zoning Commission, Con tinued) appointed, basically volunteer, positions. He felt common sense must prevail. Commissioners can contact City Staff now with their opinion on any agenda item if they cannot attend a meeting. It doesn't have to be made part of the ordinance. It was then suggested that possibly a quorum should be required to prevent the si tuation noted by Commissioner Wells. But in further discussion, it was noted that there is very seldom less than a quorum present and that attendance has not been a major problem. The consensus '",as to amend the first line to "Three consecutive unexcused Planning and Zoning Commission meeting absences..." With that change, determine whether would be required. they have resolved with attendance. Chairperson Squires suggested the Council be asked there are problems such that alternative language He has observed that where there have been problems, themselves and that there is not an on-going problem / Section 5, Officers, Meetings: Mr. Johnson stated as written the intent would be that the Commission would make a recommendation for Chairperson and Vice Chairperson, subject to City Council approval. There was considerable discussion on this item, as Commissioners Apel, Peek and Luedtke did not feel the Commission should be involved in that decision. There was a concern that it could create factions, and they felt the procedure of a recorr.mendation by the Mayor has worked well. They preferred staying with the current method of selection. Commissioners Barry and Wells felt that a secret ballot could be taken to nominate the Chair and Vice Chair, or some method used to provide input that would not be confrontational. Chairperson Squires leaned toward giving the Council total discretion for the appointments; however, when this is presented to the Council, he suggested Staff inform them of this discussion that a najority are in favor of leaving the practice as is but there is some sentiment to giving the Planning Commiss ion some input. There were no further comments on the proposed ordinance. ORDINANCE REVIEW - ORDINANCE NO. 203, SEWER SERVICE/RESERVE CAPACITY COSTS Mr. Johnson explained the proposal is to repeal Ordinance No. 13 and replace it with Ordinance No. 203. There are no major changes in the new ordinance other than updating Section 4 relating to penalties. The Building Official and City Engineer are comfortable with the ordinance as proposed. The Commission discussed the SAC charges but recommended no changes. 0f) .' Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 12, 1996 Page 7 DISCUSSION - REVIEW OF ORDINANCE NO. 13, SEWER SERVICE/RESERVE CAPACITY COSTS Mr. Johnson stated the Building Official and City Engineer have recommended no change to the ordinance, that it should remain on file as is. The Commission felt Section 4, Penalty, should be updated to reflect current law. They also questioned whether the rates in Section 2 need to be updated. "Metropolitan Waste Control Commission" mentioned in the first paragraph is to be corrected to the current name of that board. OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Johnson noted the terms of Commissioners Luedtke and Putnam expire at the end of 1996. He encouraged them to write a letter to Mr. Carlberg by November 26 if they wish to be reappointed to the Commission. Mr. Johnson also reported the actions taken by the City Council on Planning Commission items at its November 6, 1996, meeting. There was a brief discussion on the criteria to be considered when reviewing requests for Special Use Permits on nonconforming home occupations. The Commission suggested the Fire Marshal or Building Official be involved in the inspections of the sites so they will be given expert opinions in those areas prior to the public hearings. / MOTION by Luedtke, Seconded by Wells, to adjourn. Motion carried on a 4-Yes, 3-Absent (Apel, Barry, Putnam) vote. The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, I ~""-.i~ _..J "~~ \ ~:-L-<: '-- .- Marcella A. Peach Recording Secretary J / Q,;t.dt71a.no/#13 ORD~~A~CE ES~ABLISH~~G SEWER SERVICE AVAILABILITY A~~ CONNECTION CHARGE TO ?AY RESERVE CA?ACI~Y COSTS OF METROPOLITAN SEWER BOARD BE IT ORDhINED by t~e Tow~ Board of t~e Township of Grow, County of A.~o~a, Mi~nesota, as follows: 1. Recitals. The Metropolitan Sewer Board has d~termined to rese~~e unused capacity in the metropolitan disposal system each year cOIT~e~cing i~ 1973 for local governme~t uni ts ...~ w;~ich new buildings to be connected to tl-.e system a:.-:d ;;.e\.; con~ec~ior,s ~o the system are commenced during such year; and to allocate the debt service costs of such unused capaci~7 for the ye&r ~~ong such local government units as provided i:.-: ~,,~.tropoli t.:.n Se;'ler Board Resolutio~ 72-225 adopted December €, 1972. I~ order for the Towns~ip to pay such costs allocated to i ~~ eac~ ye2..::: I -it will be necessary to establish sewe~ se::vi~~ av~i:a~ili~y and co~nection charges for all buildi~gsto be constructed or co~~ected to the metropolitan disposal system on o~ a=~er ~anuary 1, 1973. I 2. Establis~~ent of C~arqes. For the purpose of ~ayi~s costs oZ reserve capacity allocated to the Township each year ~7 the ~etropolitan Sewer Board, ~~ere is hereby established a charge for: (a) the availability of trea~~ent works and interceptors comprising t~e metropolitan disposal system; and (b) connections, direct and indirect, to t~e metropolita~ disposal system. T:,e charge is imposed on eac;., buildi~g or structure in tha 'C po~''::''v:~ 01. Grow ~ownship-lying within Y>etropolitan Sewer Board Distr:.c~ Nu~er 2 and each connection to ~~e metropolitan disposal sys'Ce~ directly or through the ~owns::'i? I s system, construction 0::: ;v'~ic:'. is corr~~nced on or after January 1, 1973. ~he c~arge shall be :>avable upon the issuance of a building permit or a conr.ection pe~mi~, as ~~e case may be, bu~ no charge shall be due upon ~.e issuance of a connection permit if a charge was paid upon issuanc~ of a building permit. .' ~he charge for eac~ building or structure shall be equa: to 'C..e numl:Jer of units of sewage volu:.-.e which it will discharse, ~~:~i?:iad by $275 for 1973, $300 for 1974, $325 for 1975, $~5C ~O~ 1976 anc. $375 :::or 1977. A u;:.:.-.:. of sewage volu.~e sha:l be :'CC,CCC sa::o;:.s per year and shall bc assisncc. as =ollows: -' (a) Single family ~10uses, townhouses and dup::;'e;, units shall each comprise one unit; / (b) Condominiums and apart~ents shall each COffip~~~a 80% of a \:.nit; (c) Mobile homes shall each comprise 80~ of a ~~i~i (d) Othe~ builci~~s and struct~=es shall be aS5i;~e~ cne unit for each 100,000 gallons of flc~~ o~ part ~!ereof which it is estimated they wi:: discharge; (a) Public housi~g uni~s and housing units subsidized u::-.c.er any fec.eral program fa::: ::.C~,; and ~oderate income ho\:.sing shall be cou~t~d as 75~ of t:.a un:.J~ e~uiva:ent :for t:."-1a't. .CV":J~ of housL"lg; '..: "- \-J Units exist~~g or for w~ich buildi~g ~e~~~~~ we=a i55~ed ,~ior to ~anua~y 1, ~973, s~~:: ~~ counted as c~e-~alf ~he unit e~uivale~t ~C~ that ~ype of ho\:.sing, if conn~cted ~o '~,e Metropcli~an ~isposal Systam prio~ to J~~~~~~ 1974, a~d shall be cou~ted at ~.e full ra~~ thereafter. -/ I ..'. The Administra;:ion. The Tmmship B\:.ilding I::S:J~C-;:0~ .5(,,2..~~ p==~p":l.:""e or revise ~uild.:..::.S' per;;l.i"t 0::" sewage conneC1:.:"o~1 per~it application forms to provide information necessary fo::: ~~a cor:-.pu.";:<::.-:.io:-. of t:-:e nlli'1'be= of t:..nit.3 assig:lable to the bi.:.iic.:.:-..g c:: st~~ct~re in q~estion, and sha:: collect the applicable cha~s~ ~~~C~~ issuance of a permit. Tha 3~ilding Inspector shall iliake such infor~a~ion available to the Sewer 3oa~d upon request. If ~?O~ ~ili::g a report covering such perilii t with the Metropoli 'tan Se\l.2;~ ~oara, ~~e Board determines ~~at a greater n~~~er of units :'5 as~ig~a~le to the buildi~g O~ st~uc~~re in g~estion, any adci~ional ar.;ount of cost allocated to ~e Township as a ~2SU~;: Si1&:: ba paid by t,,~e person or ccr;lpany to whorr~ the ::?e~~~i t. \'/;;'8 g::anted. 4. Penalty. Any person vio:a~ing any provision o~ ~-_~ or~~nance s~all be g\:.ilty of a ~isdemeanor and upon convic-;:io~ t~c=eof, shall be fined in a S~~ ~ot to exceed $300.00 O~ ~~?~~~~~~C ... w. :?~~l:.c ja:..l ior ~ot ~.c:::a 't.::.an 90 c.ays, or both. 5. 3ifective Dat~. This crdi~ance s~all take e=~~c~ ana De in force upon its passage and p~b:ication a3 ~equi~ad ~~ :a~!. - -,., Cr""t:, Adc:J'~~c.. ~y t.~e G::ow . Tc\r:. .,joa=c. c...'1:'S . day oi ~a~~a~YI -~.~. / '. ,:'~!I"._J- ; _ ___:_:".;_-2_~~~_. .;.::.:..;c, ~":~I~.~\. "'/\ ~ ! : ; f~ fl l.../'{ /'...... " I ':'G~i:\S~:;:? c:: GRCt'l ~ o OJ \-. I.^.",~ / ."1.-.-'( ~ /."/~j',-,:- .. r-tM":.'-r"'1. i...... .........:1_ . CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. l3A , , "- ~I AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 13, AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SEWER SERVICE AVAILABILITY AND CONNECTION CHARGE TO PAY RESERVE CAPACITY COSTS OF THE METROPOLITAN SEWER BOARD. BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Andover: Hereinafter the Metropolitan Sewer Board shall be called Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. The following sections of Ordinance No. 13, adopted January 9th, 1973, are hereby amended to read as follows: (Amendment underscored) Section 1. Recitals The Metropolitan Waste Control Commis sion has determined to reserve unused capacity in the metropolitan disposal system each year commencing in 1973 for local government units in which new buildings to be connected to the system and new connections to the system are commenced during such year; and to allocate the debt service C06ts of such unused capacity for the year among such local government units as provided in Metropolitan Sewer Board Resolution 72 -225 and Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Resolution 77-193. In order for the City to pay such costs allocated to it each year, it will be necessary to establish sewer service availability and connection charges for all buildings to be constructed or connected to the metropolitan disposal system on or after January I, 1973. / Section 2. Establishment of Charges. For the purpose of paying costs of reserve capacity allocated to the City each year by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, there is hereby established a charge for: a. the availability of treatment works and interceptors comprising the metropolitan disposal system, and b. connections, direct and indirect, to the metropolitan disposal system. The charge is imposed on each building or structure in that portion of the City of Andover lying within Metropolitan Waste Control Commission District Number 2 and each connection to the metropolitan disposal system directly or through the City's system, construction of which is commenced on or after January 1, 1973. The charge shall be payable upon the issuance of a building permit or a connection permit, whichever shall come first. The charge for each building or structure shall be equal to the number of units of sewage volume which it shall discharge multiplied by $275 for 1973, $300 for 1974, $325 for 1975, $350 for 1976, $375 for 1977, $400 for 197-Sand $425 for 1979. \ Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 20thday of December, 1977. ;' . .~-~-. ~ '- .:....- / / / .-:._.-:7 Jerry Wintlsch-it-l - Mayor , 'J \ \ ' J \ , \ \ CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA / ORDINANCE NO. l3B AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 13 AND NO. l3A, AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SEWER SERVICE AVAILABILITY AND CONNECTION CHARGE TO PAY RESERVE CAPACITY COSTS OF THE METROPOLITAN SEWER BOARD. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: Ordinance No. 13 and No. l3A are amended as follows: The charge for each building or structure shall be equal to the number of units of sewage volume which it shall discharge multiplied by $275 for 1983, $300 for 1974, $325 for 1975, $350 for 1976, $375 for 1977, $400 for 1978 and $425 for 1979. The charqe for future years will be as set by council resolution per the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's directive. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day 2nd of , 19JJL. Februarv CITY OF ANDOVER J ATTEST: . .,. "'-- --- - - ".-/' J~rry Windschitl - Mayor , .-'" -'. Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION , } DATE: February 18. 1997 AGENDA SECTION Reports of Staff, Committees, Commissions ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Approve List of Candidates to be Submitted to County Board for Coon Creek Watershed District Representative Position -..3 (l. Scott Erickson,~L Engineering Staff has discussed with the Anoka County Administrator the vacancy and re-appointment procedure for the Coon Creek Watershed District appointment. The County has indicated that they will be advertising the position opening and directing all interested candidates to contact Andover City Hall for consideration. From this list of candidates, or other candidates the City Council may wish to recommend, the Council will need to forward a minimum of three names to the County Board. This list will need to be presented to the County no later then March 27, 1997. The candidate selection will be included on the March 18, 1997, City Council agenda. " " . , CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 18. 1997 AGENDA SECnON 110 Non-Diseussion ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA 81. Amended Special Use Permit Accessory Structure 16473 Valley Drive NW Michael and Sue Bleekef Planning (RY ITEM 110 Jeff Johnsoy( ,-U \ REQUEST The City Council is asked to review and approve the request for an Amended Special Use Permit by Michael and Sue Bleeker to eonstruct an aecessory structure prior to the construction ofa principal structure on the property located at 16473 Valley Drive NW. \ Please consult the attaehed staff feport and minutes from the January 28, 1997 Planning and Zoning Commission for further information. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the Amended Special Use Permit request with conditions. A resolution is attached for Council approval. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF MICHAEL AND SUE BLEEKER TO CONSTRUCT AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16473 VALLEY DRIVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT A. WHEREAS, Michael and Sue Bleeker have requested a Amended Special Permit to construct an accessory structure prior to the construction a principal structure on the property legally described on Exhibit A; and Use of WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance 8, Sections 4.05, 5.03 and 6.02; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no opposition regarding said request; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Amended Special Use Permit requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the request of Michael and Sue Bleeker to construct an accessory structure prior to the construction of a principal structure on said property with the following conditions: 1. All conditions stated in Resolution R098-95 shall be met. 2. The construction of the principal structure shall be initiated within one (1) year of the granting of the Amended Special Use Permit. 3. The applicant agrees to keep all equipment and machinery within the proposed outbuilding or screened so as not to be visible from adjacent properties prior to, and after business hours. 4. The Amended Special Use Permit shall be subject to a sunset clause as established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(D). 5. The applicant shall re-Iocate (if necessary) any accessory building(s) and comply with Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05 - Placement of Accessory Structures, prior to the construction of a principal structure. 6. Placement and construction of accessory building shall meet all applicable City Ordinances and State (building and fire) Codes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this ~ day of February, 1997. CITY OF ANDOVER / ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk ) EXHIBIT A L29234 That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: \ Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 17; thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds East, assumed bearing along the North line of said North line of said Section 17 a distance of 439.84 feet to its intersection with the centerline of Valley Drive; thence South 3 degrees 45 minutes 42 seconds East along said centerline a distance of 235.40 feet; thence South 461.35 feet along a tangential curve concave to the west, having a radius of 2204.18 feet and a central angle of 11 degrees 59 minutes 33 seconds; thence South 8 degrees 13 minutes 51 seconds West tangent with said curve 289.39 feet; thence South 81 degrees 46 minutes 09 seconds East 300.30 feet; thence North 14 degrees 56 minutes 26 seconds East 342.35 feet; thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds East 247.86 feet; thence North 0 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds East 70.09 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 0 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds East 322.18 feet to a point 300.00 feet south of the north line of said Section 17; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds West 572.25 feet to the centerline of said Valley Drive; thence Northerly along the centerline of said Valley Drive to the North line of said Section 17; thence easterly along said north line to the northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 17; thence Southerly along the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17 to the intersection with a line Which bears South 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds East from the point of beginning; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds West 270.16 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating. Said parcels contains 7.81 acres more or less. Subject to Valley Drive. J ~ ~ ~ .' .' \ ) Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Comnission Meeting Minur:es - Janua1:Y 28, ].997 Page 4 J PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: SPECIAL USE PERMIT - GOLF DRIVING RANGE AND PUTTING COURSE - 2989 166TH LANE NW - JEFF LEADENS 7:55 p.m. Mr. Hinzman reviewed the request of Jeff Leadens to operate a golf driving range and putting course on property located east of Round Lake Boulevard on the existing Terry's Turf sod farm location. The existing building would be utilized for office and storage space, and the boxes would be constructed to the south, facing southeast. Fencing would be providing along the perimeter of the driving area, and tile complex would not be lit. MOTION by Squires, Seconded by Luedtke, to open the public hearing. MotioE carried unanimously. 7:58 p.m. Tom Widhalm, 2742 164th Avenue - turned in the petition opposing the proposal. MOTION by Squires, Seconded by Apel, to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. 8:00 p.m. MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Luedtke, using the Resolution provided by Staff, to d~ny the Special Use Permit request of Jeff Leadens to operate a golf driving range on the basis that they are rec~nmending denial of the rezoning, that i~ would adversely affect existing and anticipated ,/, traffic conditions and it is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried unanimously. This will be placed on the February 18, 1997, City Council agenda. 8:03 p.m. @AUBLIC HEARING: ...-"'fF STRUCTURE PRIOR TO BLEEKER AJK.ENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT CONSTRUCT ACCESSORY PRINCIPAL - 16473 VALLEY DRIVE NW - MICHAEL AND SUSA."1 8 : 03 p. m. Ms. Osmundson reviewed the request of Michael and Susan Bleeke:t: for an Amended Special Use Permit to construct an accessory structure prior to the principal structure at 16473 Valley Drive. The structure would be constructed of metal and utilized for storage of equipment and machinery. The Bleekers currently operate a commercial greenhouse on the property. She reviewed the ordinances and criteria to be considered, noting the City Council approved a Special Use Permit to operate a commercial greenhouse on the property in June, 1995. The Bleekers have agreed to build a principal structure within one year of the construction of the accessory structure. MOTION by Luedtke, Seconded by Gamache, to open the lJublic hearing. Motion carried unanimously. 8:10 p.m. " Sue Bleeker, 16473 Vallev Drive - stated they asked for a period years before they would have to build a house on the property. would like more time to arrange for that construction. of two They MOTION by Barry, Seco~ded by Wells, to close the public hearing. Motion carried u~ani~oualy. 8:12 p.m. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 28, 1997 Page 5 / (Public Hearing: Amended Special Use Permi t - Construct Accessory Structure Prior to Principal - Bleeker, Continued) Mr. Johnson noted Staff has received no complaints on the existing use. Some concern has been raised concerning the movement of dirt on the property, that is pushing and grading. That will be discussed with the property owners further to be sure there is no interference with the wetlands. Fill will probably be needed to establish a building pad, but the Bleekers are working with the Building Department to establish the pad for the principle structure. He noted the Bleekers are asking for two years to build the principal structure, but typically the City has only allowed one year. Commisisoner Wells wondered if this should be tabled until it can be determined that there is a buildable site for the principle structure. Mr. Johnson didn't think there would be a problem, though some fill may be needed. The Bleekers are working with the Building Department. In discussing condition 2 on the prepared Resolution, the Commission felt the wording needs to be changed to reflect the sunset clause. Mr. Johnson explained condition 5 is an agreement reached with the Bleekers that the greenhouses would be relocated to the rear of the house when the principal structure is constructed. Also, another condition could be added on a sunset clause for the accessory building, that '. construction shall begin wi thin one year of approval of the Amended /j Special Use Permit. MOTION by Squires, Seconded by Luedtke, to recommend approval of the Special Use Permit request in the attached Resolution with the deletion of the current #1 and inserting in its place a provision that simply states, "The construction of the principal structure must be initiated within one year of the granting of the Conditional Use Permit". Motion carried OIl a 6-Yes, 1-Abstain (Wells) vote. This will be placed on the February 18, 1997, City Council agenda. 8:25 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING: AMEND ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTIONS 4.11 AND 7.03 AMENDMENT RELATED TO RELOCATION OF STRUCTURES 8:25 p.m. Mr. Johnson reviewed the proposed amendments relating to the relocation of structures. MOTION by Wells, Seconded by Barry, to open the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. 8:27 p.m. There was no public testimony. MOTION by Wells, Seconded by Squires, to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. 8:27 p.m. , /. MOTION by Wells, Seconded by Luedtke, to forward to the City Council the zoning amendments as stated by Staff. Motion carried unanimously. This will be placed on the February 18, 1997, City Council agenda. 8:27 p.m. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUESTF,OR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION '- /" January 28, 1997 DATE AGENDA ITEM 5. Public Hearing' Amended Special Use Permit Accessory Structure 16473 Valley Drive APPROVED FOR AGENDA Jeff Johnson ..K~zoning Administrator ~~~~LaDa~ Osmundson KJ' Planm.ng Intern BY: BY: REOUEST The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the Amended Special Use Permit requested by Michael and Sue Bleeker to construct an accessory structure (see attached drawings) prior to the construction of a principal structure on the property located at 16473 Valley Drive (PIN 17-32-24-22-0009), legally described on Exhibit A. The proposed accessory structure is constructed of metal and will be utilized for the storage of equipment and machinery. The Bleekers currently operate a commercial greenhouse on the property. The lot is approximately eight (8) acres and is zoned R-1, Single Family Rural. " APPLICABLE ORDINANCES Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05 states that, "No accessory building or use shall be constructed or developed on a lot prior to the time of construction of the principal building except by Special Use Permit." Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05 also regulates the location of accessory buildings in relation to the principal structure on a lot, stating that, "No detached garages or other accessory buildings shall be located nearer the front line than the principal structure except as herein provided: (1) On residential parcels with a lot area of one acre or more, a detached garage or accessory building may be constructed closer to the front lot line than the principal structure, however, the minimum distance it may be from the front lot line is sixty (60) feet. (2) All detached garages or accessory buildings constructed nearer the front lot line than the principal structure shall be similar in design and exterior finish material so as to be compatible to the principal structures." Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 regulates the size of accessory buildings, stating that square footage of all buildings may not exceed 20% of the total square footage of the property. / Page Two ASUP - Accessory Structure 16473 Valley Drive Michael and Sue Bleeker January 28, 1997 Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the Special Use Permit process. In granting a Special Use Permit, the following criteria shall be examined. 1. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. 2. The existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land. 3. The effect on the values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area. 4. The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. GENERAL REVIEW J Bleeker Landscaping applied for, and was granted a Special Use Permit to operate a commercial greenhouse (Approved by City Council - June 6, 1995). Two greenhouses, which collectively cover approximately 2,000 square feet, now exist on the property (as shown on the attached drawing). Michael and Sue Bleeker have agreed to build a principal structure within one year of the construction of the proposed accessory structure. The proposed accessory structure is 60' x 84' (5040 square feet), and will be utilized for the storage of equipment and machinery. COMMISSION CONSIDERATIONS The Commission should consider the status of the two existing greenhouses, as related to the future existence of a principal structure, as regulated in Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05, (F). COMMISSION OPTIONS 1. The Planning and zoning commission may approve the Amended Special Use Permit requested by Michael and Sue Bleeker to construct an accessory building for storing equipment and machinery, prior to the construction of a principal building on the property located at 16473 Valley Drive (PIN 17-32-24-22-0009), legally described on Exhibit A. / Page Three ASUP - Accessory Structure 16473 Valley Drive Michael and Sue Bleeker January 28, 1997 The Commission finds the request meets the criteria established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, including: the use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the community; the use will not cause serious traffic congestion or hazards; the use will not depreciate the surrounding property and the use is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. The Commission also finds that the use meets the provisions specified in Ordinance No.8, Sections 4.05, 5.03 and 6.02. 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission may deny the Amended Special Use Permit requested by Michael and Sue Bleeker to construct an accessory building for storing equipment and machinery, prior to the construction of a principal building on the property located at 16473 Valley Drive (PIN 17-32-24-22-0009), legally described on Exhibit A. The Commission finds the request does not meet the criteria established in Ordinance No.8, Sections 4.05, 5.03 or 6.02. In denying the request, the Commission shall state those reasons for doing so. 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item. j CONDITIONS OF AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT If the Commission chooses to recommend approval of the request, Staff recommends the following conditions to be added: 1. All conditions stated in Resolution R098-95 shall be met. 2. There is a sunset clause in the event the property is sold. Construction of a principal structure on the property shall be initiated within one (1) year of the sale of the property. 3. The applicant agrees to keep all equipment and machinery within the proposed outbuilding or screened so as not to be visible from adjacent properties prior to, and after business hours. 4. The Amended Special Use Permit shall be subject to a sunset clause as established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(D). 5. The applicant shall re-Iocate (if necessary) any accessory building(s) and comply with Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05 - Placement of Accessory Structures, prior to the construction of a principal structure. \ / 6. Placement and construction of accessory building shall meet all applicable City Ordinances and State (building and fire) Codes. CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA J RES. NO. R A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF MICHAEL AND SUE BLEEKER TO CONSTRUCT AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16473 VALLEY DRIVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT A. WHEREAS, Michael and Sue Bleeker have requested a Amended Special Permit to construct an accessory structure prior to the construction a principal structure on the property legally described on Exhibit A; and Use of WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance 8, Sections 4.05, 5.03 and 6.02; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no opposition regarding said request; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Amended Special Use Permit requested. / NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning commission and approves the request of Michael and Sue Bleeker to construct an accessory structure prior to the construction of a principal structure on said property with the following conditions: b~1. All conditions stated in Resolution R098-95 shall be met. 2. There is a sunset clause in the event the property is sold. Construction of a principal structure on the property shall be initiated within one (1) year of the sale of the property. 3. The applicant agrees to keep all equipment and machinery within the proposed outbuilding or screened so as not to be visible from adjacent properties prior to, and after business hours. 4. The Amended Special Use Permit shall be subject to a sunset clause as established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(D). 5. The applicant shall re-Iocate (if necessary) any accessory building(s} and comply with Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05 - Placement of Accessory Structures, prior to the construction of a principal structure. 6. Placement and construction of accessory building shall meet all applicable City Ordinances and State (building and fire) Codes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this ___ day of Februarv, 1997. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. · ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 SPECIAL USE PERMIT Property Address I C:'i 7 ~ \.l tillC"j V)r\c.:~ Legal Description of Property: (Fill in whichever is appropriate): A", <1",-,<", I fv\ />...\ S-~~C <-f Lot Block Addi tion PIN J7 .~~ ~4 ),J cocFl Is the orooertv: information must County. ) ----------------------------------------------------------------- (If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal description. ) Abstract \ /" or Torrens ? (This be provide~ can be obtained from the Reason for Request TO ('()"-lst'l'Ct' ~u ("",uI",,-J':\Q.''-'j f='_, '5"t"""~J""(';~ ct(,J"rl'l'Y'<'l; tro.c.rn("'.s. Dr/or +0 COI1'7+/~cJ,a'1 of +he pr/ftlah S'4fdcJ.u/(? I ~ t. J / Section of Ordinance del )),i,% Current Zoning 12- I --------------------j,~-~gc--------------------~------------- Name of Applicant rn I C:.h ae. I AA)'u Sll<.: ~Iee ~r- Address l"O~ \ \ 'R T'-\ L ~ J...)(> ,I": -"- , - C~',0 Q -"F,d~. I\'\,l..\ S.y'-t"t;] Phone 7 3 5 - 3 3 do C, Date J -/-/- 96. Home Phone 7SS' - OS'7,,/ S. t .,.~~: If I3J.. 19na ure //u...".'.L 6./ ~ < L Business ----------------------------------------------------------------- Property Owner (Fee Owner) IliA/..\ He; ,'e ,~ (If different from above) Address ~~7e> ..../.f/:; ~ h,v</ . Home Phone Y-A 7- 7', Phone .4;r4/Sf3oJ bf/~ b 4/6~ O'd4-",v9? Signature /'731/P/(A Date ------------- ISPECIAL PAGE 2 USE PERMIT The following information shall be submitted prior to review by the City of Andover: / 1. A scaled drawing of the property and structures affected showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures within 100 feet. 2. The names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. Application Fees: Commercial $190.00 Residential $150.00 ;-_~mend-eo SUE) ~_5...:r:r.O 0 /----' ~ Recording Fee ._~__ ./ Abstract property ~5.~Oj Torrens property $34.50 Date Paid :/ l'i I~I 03ff/ 7 Receipt # Rev. 5-06-93:d'A 5-04-94:bh 2-0l-95:bh 3-22-95:bh Res. 179-91 (11-05-91) / CRITERIA FOR GRANTING SPECIAL USE PERMITS In granting a Special Use Permit, the City Council shall consfder the advice and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and: 1. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. 2. Existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and lands. 3. The effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area. 4. The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. / / EXHIBIT A L29234 That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 17; thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds East, assumed bearing along the North line of said North line of said Section 17 a distance of 439.84 feet to its intersection with the centerline of Valley Drive: thence South 3 degrees 45 minutes 42 seconds East along said centerline a distance of 235.40 feet; thence South 461.35 feet along a tangential curve concave to the west, having a radius of 2204.18 feet and a central angle of 11 degrees 59 minutes 33 seconds: thence South 8 degrees 13 minutes 51 seconds West tangent with said curve 289.39 feet: thence South 81 degrees 46 minutes 09 seconds East 300.30 feet; thence North 14 degrees 56 minutes 26 seconds East 342.35 feet; thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds East 247.86 feet; thence North 0 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds East 70.09 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described: thence North 0 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds East 322.18 feet to a point 300.00 feet south of the north line of said Section 17; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds West 572.25 feet to the centerline of said Valley Drive: thence Northerly along the centerline of said Valley Drive to the North line of said Section 17; thence easterly along said north line to the northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 17; thence Southerly along the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17 to the intersection with a line Which bears South 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds East from the point of beginning: thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds West 270.16 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating. Said parcels contains 7.81 acres more or less. Subject to Valley Drive. ~ ~ .' \ / C0-.1LJJ::' '.' I '; .~' F\ '"""'':: ': ~~'" ')l1 ~frC$~~~~' ~~~\ '.' . Q':, ' -- '~)io"-:}" ~ -. . Pi;~. :,~tI~. ~~f--L ~~~:~.'!- ...~-:~.~~~ ~C~ J~ 4~'(": 3"~ . .,::-;"" .;~ '- '- ' . .~,~.. -, CFnARI.CR;'C'r"-''''''I 6 f.Sf.""l t.~i.!l! PINE ';-:;1:- ~ '"/ ~ .. .4 , .. Ol.. "'"V' a :)l-llo" I~: . ,. .;.tjjr)- _h ,_ . c: ... . $, . ,..,. PiTA E'; '. . ".,. I, .' ,>-+-, , , . C , = .~~. r.-; ,;:c<o.;. C';Si:~5~~"S '" I ;.'" ", jj 2NO'AOO.";T'.. . ._~':"-;:2 ,~'~~~~~ ~;:~~,~r;:' i,'~'~:._'_.~~' _ _____ ------ ~. ~. ~ ~~ ~~A~~~~~~ni~~_L.___~__h___ ",'" ,.~~~ \~--~~~~~,..;_.) "-- R 2 \ Ku..: 2.~" 'AD. _ 1--';7"':'11, U ' - _.1\\ (I '/. "6:',;'/ ,,' : I I ~-;PRAIRIE, .z~ . . ~N~ " , ~7I... ~.;""';" I' CREST' " "4' ,,' MEA,?OWS .3 I '- ~U I.. i,' "" ~' ,2', I .trf:~~6~~ '. ....II.O.OOWS..; 81 I \ f'~ -~ -,' ~, ER~, ~. l 'II' ~l'"'oO- 1 Jltl' . . , ~. , . - -.,.....~ - ,,' // ~:: ~_ _': ~, . 5' . . : , ~//-. ., -,", \ _?"O/I )- ~'i ~, "'" -\.\ _-;-~f'_--h__-~ A\\\ ~--" ~ ~\ . ,,' , .' r ~ R-3 I' ("''-~ \ \ r~ CASTNER ~ ~ ~ _~ ~ -==- ~h~ ~) ,~_/ :AD,O~ITlON'1 -~GrE'=:O REGISTERED i-- ~-:--...~ -*J.""J"';;_ ..?-" _ , ' _.;. . LAND SURVEY _, - 1-,. I' ,/ - '" : ~F5=~ ------NO,-6~~.--- ,-__ ~~5~"<~/~1, ~7 ,- I -' ~ R--t ~ ~s.B ~,~, ~ " SUR';;~ Ib.;,..;:;,,,~,, y' - r ~ ..---:\' '\. " __-: .' - _. I :..!~ - II : - , L.J:.i..' ~ /L _J ACRES.' - II ' ~~~., ',' ~ " - ~-r-~u - ~- I ~~_~~~;;~:-: _. ~:' }:~' ',): '. ~-, ,,=~ I ~ : ~ --C ~~/N.I"i.- ~~ J ~l ~ . ,_, ,"""/'. A' II '~HIlJ.LS'" .-1 .' -~7 "I~ . FOX'" -:-:f-c..1j ~_?~~bo .~ -11 ...J - ~_~ -. --Ii =IF=-1 _n ':?~.1 ~,~.,~ql, ~ ,,~ ~,~ ,L"v:;;::::;r; ~=- - ,ME'A~~WS;-' -J, '---/1- i '2. l~~N~~~ ~ -;"'~.-: ~~~,~~,;",~.. 0-.~ ;~= '. (~~Iy~' 2" ~~ -:----'r'ili~7Af~'~ - \5, " . IE- ~= I ~" ~ ~ "._il ... l----f- - - ' '- . ~ z' ; '-1' I.. . if . t , - :.... _ . f.<f!!o ......... - ""- ' ~ . ", . ".. _ .,1 _ I " -~{, ~:\ '\.. . r' . y. . \\ "",\.;; -. ~"""2\ J. ; r-J~=-':"" -y. ~ I;'OIA;.JM~AOO'w~U' , ~ ~."\,,' " ,'" .' II ", I - r!;.~-:s _'S _I_"_~___~L_~+___ t~'lI .~ i \~_..~~~, ~ R-I ~~.,. '14.'1 .,:.. - -:- ;-;- - " I'.. , .' , .. i-I I: ~ -".. , . .!' II, . . :, . : _ lll~' ,. .'\: "'. . '. ' I ~. ___.__:.....____J. ", J ..; i ., " ~ - ,', "i AG. , .. ,'. r PRESERVE .. .,: - iA , ~L J . ~ "!, b 3 , . . I . =17~,~ L- A <2.'~,1~.:t"' ::~, ():'E~ ;Y: 4 '~.~ . I . ____, ...'~ .6., ~--':"':"i /"). ~--...., J. " : -~ ,- I T\ ":} ~~} 4J .:> - a: o , it ~ ',.. ..:;a; I CO 10 o Z o <f o :r .. .. '" @ I (9) .l. ___. .__. ,(. S9.J.<'~, ~. ;, --4~',,=,'.~ :::.~ ". 'a,.. ;; 4'.' ,- a.,. p',s..~ t;. __ ~ ".)0 (.2) ..,]00.,...... 5#7. '. S .!'....,4. '=:~ E J'~..-t~ ..:L l/)l i 1 !~ ! ,I i I ('0) " ::J ~ ..... /?~.~., (I;) '" :.; "."\.: ~' ~t " /?~,g~ .t.4vr"'/?C6' C,' ........ ~, ,~ )~. '. ..~..... /'~ ' y -.!- J"d ~~v'll .,' /7'" "..- ~~ "> ", , , , , ~, ~. '" h'e . 'd' I '( 't. :....L I L I '.:> :1 s. :I 0 hI \ r" N :i 0 hi! '" ('/ ~ 0 ::I t'J \ -, .l. os '" '3. ~'{. , "e 'C. '? '\ f I l ~! I ;/ I !n f Ooj , i- -J 1--- f ~"<>=~I ! L_ITIl I 1: :: ! _i In! . I j! I ,~or o I ~I l f -; ~~ a ; ~~ ) -~...- (--,<f1J - cf. "'l'" ,. O"J hf Chbtl '--- ~ w -I: o J <:- < --+ 'b ~ 3^\ClG h'.sn~ -;] "th, >'h o't: <; (Yl " L. e . Ie: 0 0 N jn ;" ia-: 1M tv) ,001 -) 1 ; A~ " <;;; \"" [\J dnl~C; ,J..3"yn 'CLh"J! b (,.) 0 - 'e-e - h'C - 'e ~ . 1....\ I I I I 1 I I j i "3 G In :r o It- ;)0> 2. gl' ~'e'<: J J 6 ~ "3 \.Jl \J) :r o ... 'P '2. :3 hO 1->1 ooN " I I = ,,0<;>/1, , :l.JV~ 1/9/1997 ! * * * This sheet MISt be fm. to Mi.west Maufacflril! for castOM mili-prilt * * * , e are the materials you have selected: '?U have selected a 60' x 84' X 16' post frame building_ The options you have chosen are: ../ Truss Spacing, 4SIb Truss Load, 4 x 12 Pitch - Miscellaneous Service Doors And Windows The Pro-Rib Panel Colors You Have Chosen Are: - 4' Eavelitels) - Walls = = > Forest Green - Roof = = > White - Trim = = > White Ri dgelite Galvanized Neoprene Washer Screws for the Roof (Best) Galvanized Neoprene Washer Screws for the Walls (Best) Bottom Trim 24" Front Sidewall Overhang, 24" Back Sidewall Overhang 24" Front Endwall Overhang, 24" Back Endwall Overhang Bronze Soffit Color Inside Closure Strips 2 - Insulated Ribbed White Overhead Ooor(s) Contractor Trim For Overhead Ooor(s) Custom Mini-Print To Aid In Construction Front View: Back View: * Sahstihtim are lee~e~ 'or the 'OllOl/'I!: SKU QTY Descriptiol 109&299 % 6X&-30' RIS GREEN TREAT60SPEC ORDER 1093309 1 6X&-U' RIS GREEN TREAT60SPEC ORDER ) .[~=-n -r -- rm Si~ewlII : - 10' X 10' OYlrhll~ 396" DP EdwIII: - No Doors Si~ewlII : - No Doors Ear-III: - 16' X 14' OYlrhll~ %64" DP ** DP ==> (D)oor (P)lecement, from thelelt lide olthe will (in Inchell. ** DP ==> (Dloor (Plllcement, from thelelt lide olthe wllIlin inchell. Door plteelllllt is hlSl~ 01 Mi~wlSt M""lchr'l! specilicltim hat Clft he ClSto.lll~ to ,oar specificltim It the BaiWI! Mlterills cmter. Alk I B.i1~ia! Mlterills lUocilte 'or ~ehilsl For Midwest Mlnu'lcfuring use only: Selection Code : 03600841601FOWHWHO%0000000%0%010UmBZ01010%W140000EOOOO00NOOOOOOS0600000%0%00 Options Code: 000%03000000000000000000 DW Code: D%03W60% , ., T btAay'S cost for materials estimated in this design with options: $23649.73 *Th~ ~m ,rice ilelo~u: '1Itllile~ steel si~ia! II~ roolia!, !lltllilt~ ri~!e ",, W (BAS E price) · $16747 47 white eeraer II~ !1~le tnlll. · · .ATE OF MINNESOTA 1172887 J COUNTY OF ANORA CITY OF ANDOVER 1'/- 3;) -aC{ -;).. if - OOC9 ct~ I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Andover, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached Resolution No. R098-95 aoorovin a s ecial use oermit for 16473 Vallev Drive with the original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be a true and correct transcript of the whole thereof. , , ) IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my hand this 20th day of June , 1995. lc %7'- d.;'.!' V~ctor~a Volk - C~ty Clerk (SEAL) \ / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ) RES. NO. 098-95 A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF MICHAEL AND SUE BLEEKER TO OPERATE A COMMERCIAL GREENHOUSE ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16473 VALLEY DRIVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT A. WHEREAS, Michael and Sue Bleeker have requested a Special Use Permit to operate a commercial greenhouse on the property located at 16473 Valley Drive, legally described on Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance 8, Sections 5.03 and 7.03; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was opposition and concerns regarding traffic patterns associated with said request; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of ; the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission to allow Michael and Sue Bleeker to operate a commercial greenhouse on said property with the following conditions: 1. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual review and site inspection. 2. The Special Use Permit shall be subject to a sunset clause as specified in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(0), unless a renewal is granted by the City Council. 3. Two (2) satellite lavatories be on site and maintained in a usable sanitary condition. 4. The parking facilities shall not be expanded any larger than it already exists (8-10 car max). 5. The grade for the parking and access driveway onto Valley Drive shall be improved and reviewed and approved by Staff. j / / / " , J Page 2 Resolution Special Use Permit - Commercial Greenhouse Michael & Sue Bleeker 16473 Valley Drive. 6. Hours of operation shall be limited to 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., Wednesday through Sunday. 7. A Building Permit shall be required for the greenhouse. 8. The wetlands shall be delineated and the impact of the operation on the wetlands shall be disclosed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 6th day of June, 1995. ATTEST: ~tI~ Vlctorla Volk, City Clerk ((/1 ~\~)~ CITY of ANDOVER (r\ 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 ~ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - MAY 23, 1995 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and zoning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Jay Squires on May 23, 1995, 7:10 p.m. at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. May 9, 1995: Maynard Apel, Catherine Doucette, Bev Jovanovich, Jeffrey Luedtke, Randy Peek, Jerry Putnam ' / None / Assistant City Engineer, Todd Haas City Planning Director, David Carlberg Others // , / ,/ / / Page 4, First~p~ragraPh, change to: "Commissioner Jovanovich was/ concerned with placing the signage on Round Lake B~levard far enough in advance..." , / )TION by Peek, Seconded by Jovanovich, amended. Motion c~a unanimously. PRESENTATION: R17SULTS FROM TASK FORCE ON AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE 8 Charlie veima ~i3646 Crooked Lake Boulevard - reported_ the Task Force meetings and has reviewed every word in Ordinance 8. Several ch ges have been recommended, including the areas of allowing people 0 private property without permission, who can bring a complaint against someone in the neighborhood, storage in the urban area, etc. He discu ed many of the changes with residents in his neighborhood, and the unanimously approved of the recommended changes. Chairperson S ires thanked Mr. Veiman for the efforts of the Committee. approval of the Minutes as Commissioners present: Commissioners absent: Also present: APPROVAL OF MINUTES ~PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL USE PERMIT - COMMERCIAL GREENHOUSE, 16473 ~VALLEY DRIVE - MICHAEL & SUE BLEEKER (BLEEKER'S LANDSCAPING) 7: 15 p. m. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the Special Use Permit request of Michael and Sue Bleeker to operate a commercial greenhouse and noted the applicable ordinances and criteria to be used when examining Special Use Permits. The Bleeker's are able to sell products grown on their property without this Permit, which is considered an agricultural practice. The .commercial greenhouse comes into play when they bring products from ')ther locations to sellon site. The concern of the Staff is with whether to require a paved parking lot and with providing bathroom facilities. The other commercial greenhouse, Knolls, was not required to pave the parking lot because of the desire retain the residential character of the site. This site does not have a residential structure on it. There is a commercial green house on site, but no office space. Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 23, 1995 --age 2 / (Public Hearing: Special Use Permit - Commercial Greenhouse, Bleeker, Continued) MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Leudtke, to open the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. 7:25 p.m. Sue Bleeker - stated they have operated a landscaping company for the last five years and have decided to have a place where the clients can look at the plants. They started growing shrubs three years ago and have had some sales. They intend to sell trees and shrubs and to operate a small greenhouse. About 20 percent of their products would be larger items brought to the site, mostly shrubs, lilacs, some potted trees. They are brought in once a year by semi truck from Bailey's Nursery. They do not have continuous deliveries. Hours of operation are Wednesday through Sunday from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. On a busy day, they have maybe five or six vehicles; sometimes two at the same time. They would like that to increase up to 10 to 20 people in a day. There is a sign that says Bleeker Landscaping which has been there for five years. Sales are mostly in the spring. There is some landscaping equipment on the site, but it is not visible. The parking lot is recycled concrete which can park about eight cars at a time. There is a well on site. Declan O'Brien. 3992 165th Avenue NW - has lived there since October 1, ~993. Valley Drive is basically a residential street. Any increase in traffic would have to corne across the front of his property and down Valley Drive. He questioned what-benefit is a commercial site to him and his neighbors. He didn't think the residents would be paying less taxes, and he saw no benefit to the community. He stated it would be a loss to him because he pays taxes that grants him peace and tranquility. Bud Holtz, 4176 164th Avenue NW - recalled a request for a Permit for a group home on Valley Drive recently, and the big concern was the traffic on that curvy section of Valley Drive. It is a real safety factor there with the curves and no shoulders. Several times in the last month since the business has opened they have observed cars parked on both sides of Valley Drive. In his opinion, that is a safety hazard. Also, the property is lower than the road at that point, so the driveway has a steep incline. When wet, the driveway is greasy and cars have to gun it to get onto Valley Drive. Visibility is poor there because of the curves on Valley Drive in both directions; and people travel at a high speed through there. Also, there is no permanent structure for retail trade; and the need for public restrooms needs to be addressed. Rob-Lvn Hiltz, 16541 Vallev Drive NW - has been there all spring and on weekends, and they do not hear anything from the greenhouse. She has never seen traffic parking on valley Drive. The few people she's seen go to there drive to the parking lot. Tulip is a curvy road, but she ~felt that should be addressed as a separate issue. people drive faster ~than they should and the Fire Department has emergency vehicles. She didn't see a reason not to grant the permit. The business doesn't cause a problem, and she lives next door. She didn't think there would be a noticeable increase in noise. A neighbor had a garage sale last weekend -- it's not that big a deal. Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 23, 1995 '-7e 3 . / (Public Hearing: Special Use Permit - Commercial Greenhouse, Bleeker, Continued) Dick Snyder. 16445 Valley Drive - lives just south of the greenhouse property. The garage sale brought in more traffic than the nursery. He didn't see a problem at all. He's lived there since 1988 and hasn't seen an increase in traffic other than occasional youth driving too fast. He saw no problem with this request. There is a fire station, then a dog kennel, then the nursery, then a small engine welding shop along that road. The nursery is not out of character with the neighborhood. Chairperson Squires read the letter of May 22, 1995, from Bob and Bonnie Dehn expressing concerns with the request~ MOTION by Leudtke, Seconded by Jovanovich, to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. 7:40 p.m. The Commission deliberated the request noting the other commercial type uses which are allowed in residential areas that are located on the neighboring parcels. Ms. Bleeker stated they were there before the other permits were granted. They also plan to construct a house on that ~rcel in the future. They are already allowed to sell what they grow . _.1 the land. She felt it would be better to be in compliance with the bathroom facilities and parking lot. Commissioner Leudtke stated he is familiar with the road and is concerned with the safety of pedestrians and bike traffic. There are curves on the road with no shoulders and no turn lanes. He was also concerned with the lack of restroom facilities. Commissioner Jovanovich noted there would be more advertising, creating an increase in everything by granting the Permit. Chairperson Squires felt this is more in tune with the surrounding neighborhood as opposed to a "commercial operation". Eighty percent of what takes place on that site is not affected by what happens tonight. The question is whether the other 20 percent of what takes place on the property creates enough of a problem that the Special Use Permit should be denied. Mr. Carlberg stated the Permit can be approved based on the facilities as shown. If they want to add to the parking or more bathroom facilities or expand in any way, they would have to come in for an amended Special Use Permit. Commissioner Peek noted this is an agricultural based use, and it doesn't make sense to build bituminous parking lots in the middle of the field. Mr. Carlberg stated he does have some concerns with the parking facilities and the incline to the adjacent street. Engineering will have to look at it, and maybe they will have to upgrade the parking facilities. It should be measured to be sure ample parking is provided. 'so Bleeker stated they could use more grade on the driveway. They need ....;0 add more recycled concrete to it. They will also add bathroom facilities. She stated the area on the south end of the lot has a lot of trees and is where they want to build a house. She wouldn't want to put the driveway and parking there. Mr. Carlberg stated the construction of a residence on the parcel will have no impact on the Permit. .,...---. Regular Andover City Council Meeting \ Minutes - June 6, 1995 / Page 7 (~lassify "Biting Dog", Continued) Councilmember Knight felt this incident was unprovoked. There is a concern any time a dog comes out of the yard to attack someone on the street. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Kunza, the Resolution on the Noll dog, to declare the dog known as "Mary Lou" as a "biting dog". (See Resolution R097-95) DISCUSSION: Ms. Noll's daughter stated the dogs are very gentle with them. They do not attack nor bark unless provoked. Mary Lou is only three years old, and this is the first time she has bitten someone. She is very playful, but never bites. She didn't know what happened this time. Motion carried on a 3-Yes, 2-Absent (Dehn, McKelvey) vote. In the case of the Morgan's dog, the Council felt the Morgans are making an honest attempt to keep the dog confined. CouncilmemberKunza asked if the dog is going to be permanently locked up in the fenced area. Mrs. Morgan stated yes. Councilmember Knight advised that the Morgans make sure the shots for the dogs are always kept up to date. .. MOTION by Kunza, Seconded by Knight, not to declare the Morgan's dog as a biting dog. Motion carried on a 2-Yes, I-No (Jacobson), 2-Absent (Dehn, McKelvey) vote. .ll.cting Mayor Jacobson felt if the dog bites I once, one must be careful; but he felt there were incidents before this that should have had a bearing on this action. ~SPECIAL USE PERMIT/COMMERCIAL GREENHOUSE/16473 VALLEY DRIVE Mr. Carlberg reviewed the Special Use Permit request of Michael and Sue Bleeker to operate a commercial greenhouse at 16473 Valley Drive. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval with conditions. Staff is suggesting two other conditions as well: Item 7, The applicant must secure a building permit on the greenhouse itself. Item 8, There be some delineation of the wetlands on the site. He also noted that any changes in the operation, even the hours of operation, will require an amended Special Use Permit. Sabreth Burns - lives near and isn't well maintained. that much difference. Valley Drive. It is a very high-traffic road But this is a part-time thing and won't make The Council noted the P & Z discussion on the traffic concerns and the parking lot. Mr. Carlberg stated Councilmember Dehn is concerned with the size of the parking lot in that there would not be enough room for a vehicle with a trailer to pull in and get back out. She felt a larger parking lot would be necessary -co facilitate the traffic. It was indicated at the public hearing tha~ the lot holds 8 to 10 cars. / Sue Bleeker - stated there has never been a problem with parking. It is a square parking lot. Acting Mayor Jacobson noted 80 percent of ~hat is being done on the site can be done ~ithout this ?er:ni-:. T::e only difference is that small portion of business which brings in ite~s from outside the property for resale. ~egular Andover City Council Meeting 'Minutes - June 6, 1995 -' Page 8 (Special Use Permit/Commercial Greenhouse/16473 Valley Drive, Continued) MOTION by Kunza, Seconded by Knight, to accept the Resolution as stated with the two additional conditions. (See Resolution R098-95 granting the Special Use Permit) Motion carried on a 3-Yes, 2-Absent (Dehn, McKelvey) vote. APPROVE AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 53jDOG ENCLOSURES Marqaret DuPont, 3463 133rd Lane - explained she. originally presented a petition with over 100 signatures who do not want dog enclosures placed between their homes. The Planning Commission has stated the intent of the ordinance amendment is to keep dog enclosures out of the side yards and to get them in the back yards. The proposed 40 feet from an adjacent residential dwelling does not keep it out of her side yard. In her June 3, 1995, letter to the Mayor she is proposing 50 feet, which she believes would follow through with that intent and would satisfy at least 100 petitioners. Mr. Carlberg explained everyone was in agreement at t:he Planning Commission that 40 feet as proposed would meet that intent. The 50-foot proposal was not mentioned at the Planning ,Commission meeting. There is not 40 feet between most houses in the ,'urban area, and he didn't understand why the proposal would. not work. The petition with Ms. DuPont's June 3 letter seems to be the same one presented at the beginning of the process. Ms. DuPont - stated her proposal would satisfy the petitioners. They feel they have already compromised enough by letting the dog enclosures be 10 feet from the back lot line. The proposed 40 feet from the adjacent residential dwelling does not keep them out of the side yards, which is the intent. She also felt she was treated rudely and cut off at the last Planning Commission meeting. This has been debated for four months, and the residents have compromised over and over. Mr. Carlberg explained this amendment will not cover existing kennels unless they become a nuisance. This is for the placement of new kennels. It was felt the 40 feet would accomplish the intent, and Ms. DuPont agreed at the May 23 Planning Commission Meeting. Now she is saying it must be 50 feet. Ms. DuPont - had agreed with the 40 feet at the meeting; but then she measured her yard and found that it was 52 feet between her house and the neighbor's. That would allow a kennel in the side yard, which is what she is trying to avoid. She is asking for a change. After some discussion on what had taken place, the Council suggested the Planning Commission once again look a': the item and consider th.e 50-foot requirement. MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Kunza, to let the Planning and Zoning /Commission look at 50 feet. Motion carried on a 2-Yes, 1-No (Jacobson), 2-Absen~ (Dehn, McKelvey) vote. , I ,-J \ o " ',~ CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW, . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday, January 28, 1997 at Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the Special Use Permit request of Michael and Sue Bleeker to construct an accessory structure on a lot prior to the construction of a principle structure pursuant to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05 on the property located at 16473 Valley Drive (PIN 17-32- 24-22-0009). The proposed accessory structure is an outbuilding for storage of equipment and tractors. All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and location. A copy of the application will review prior to said meeting. available for public review at prior to the meeting. be available at Andover City Hall for The above information will also be Oak View Middle School on the evening L~ d./L- Victoria Volk, City Clerk publication dates: January 17, 1997 January 24, 1997 ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. 2100 3RD AVENUE ANOKA, MN 55303 1/6/97 OFFICE: 612/422-7508 FAX: 612/422-7507 , " 'PIN: 083224330031 PIN: 083224330035 HILTZ ROB-L YN S & TIMOTHY J 16541 VALLEY DR NW ANDOVER MN FISHER JULIA A & RONALD H 3977 165TH AVE NW ANDOVER MN DEHN ROBERT J JR & BONNIE L 16485 TULIP ST NW ANDOVER MN DEHN ROBERT JOHN JR & BONNIE L 16845 TULIP ST NW ANDOVER MN MILLER ELIZABETH M 16357 VALLEY DR NW ANDOVER MN SNYDER RICHARD P 16445 VALLEY DR NW ANDOVER MN JAWORSKI JAMES J & SUZANNE M 16335 VALLEY DR NW RAMSEY MN HEINEN JOHN B & LILIANA G 1602 118TH LN NW COON RAPIDS MN OBRIEN DECLAN J JR 3992 165TH AVE NW ANDOVER MN WARREN STEVEN A & KARIN L 16416 VALLEY DR NW ANDOVER MN PIN: 083224340001 PIN: 173224210001 PIN: 173224220002 PIN: 173224220006 PIN: 173224220008 -PIN: 173224220009 J PIN: 173224220010 PIN: 173224220011 55304 55304 55304 55304 55304 55304 55303 55448 55303 55303 " , , / ) CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 January 16, 1997 Michael and Sue Bleeker 1602 118th Lane NW Coon Rapids, MN 55448 RE: RECEIPT OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bleeker, This letter is to notify you that the City of Andover has received your application for a Special Use Permit to construct an accessory structure (an outbuilding for storage of equipment, tractors) prior to the construction of a principal structure, on the property located at 16473 Valley Drive. " ) Your application has been tentatively scheduled for the January 28, 1997 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at 7:00 p.m. The meeting will include a public hearing where questions may be direeted to you from commissioners or the public. A recommendation from the Planning Commission would enable the application to be plaeed on the February 18, 1997 City Council Agenda for final approval. All meetings will be held at the Oak View Middle School, 15400 Hanson Blvd. NW. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns at 755-5100. Sinee~ely, '1'f ~l)(u,uJ-/') D:;'7~t(..r-rt/-V-1..- j( \ LaDawn Osmundson Planning Intern \ ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION / DATE: February 18. 1997 AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item ITEM NO. .;J,rove Storm Sewer Maintenance Quotes/97-16 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Scott Erickson, 0l Engineering The City Council is requested to award the quotation for the storm sewer maintenance of a flared end section on Winslow Hills 3rd Addition to Old Is Gold in the amount of $1 ,800.00. Quotes received are as follows: Contractor Quote Old Is Gold Volk Sewer & Water $1,800.00 $2,200.00 The funding for this project is from the storm sewer maintenance budget. ;' We have worked with Old Is Gold in the past and accept them to perform the work. / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ) DATE: February 18. 1997 AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Scott Ericksond l Engineering ITEM NO. Approve Change Order #1/Well #3 Maintenance/ 96-28/1nclude Maintenance of Well #4 ,3:3 The City Council is request to approve Change Order #1 for Well #3 Maintenance, Project 96- 28 to include maintenance of Well #4. The maintenance of Municipal Well #3, which included the removal and rehabilitation of the pumps, piping and motor, is nearing completion. A few of the minor parts had to be replaced due to normal wear but the facility was found to be in very good operating condition. The City's Public Works Department has requested that this contract be extended to include the maintenance of Well #4. This is one of the primary wells for the City and has pumped \ sand in the past when the system had been stretched to its limits (1994-1995). With the Well J #3 maintenance being completed ahead of schedule and adequate time remaining before all of the wells will be put in operation, it is recommended to perform the additional maintenance at this time. The change order will increase the original amount by $15,000.00. The funding for this project is included in the Water Source, Storage and Treatment Budget. , ) CHANGE ORDER -' CITY OF ANDOVER Andover, MN February ,19---9.L. Change Order No.---L To Alberg Water Services. Inc. For Proiect 96-28. Well #3 Maintenance For City of Andover You are hereby directed to make the following change to your contract dated December 17 , 19~. The change and the work affected thereby is subject to all contract stipulations and covenants. This change order will (increase) (decro::u;e) (no ch::mgo) the contract sum by Fifteen Thousand Dollars and 00/100 ($15 000.00 ). This change order provides for the following extra work: Maintenance of Well #4 '\ / Approval City of Andover Owner Approval Alberg Water Services. Inc. Contractor By By City Engineer Date Date \ ) I I , ) CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER #-1- TO PROJECT NO. 96-28. WELL #3 MAINTENANCE. WHEREAS, the City of Andover has a contract for Project No. 96-28 with Alberg Water Services. LLC of Elk River MN NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to hereby approve the change order to Project No. 96-28. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting this 18th day of February ,19----9,L, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION / DATE: February 18. 1997 AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Approve Authorization/Phase II Wetland Replacement Plan w/Professional Engineering Consultants/97-2 34, Scott Ericksoncll Engineering The City Council is requested to approve hiring Professional Engineering Consultants to prepare a wetland replacement plan/design for the salvage yard redevelopment and next phase of construction. PEC prepared the replacement plan for the previous phase of construction and completed that project in a timely and effective manner. The cost estimate for this project is not to exceed $6,000.00. \ ./ . J PROF. ENGR. CONSULT. 4909265 P.01 . , " .., '" III iF ~ l & 'i' ~ C "~OFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INCOR.PORATED ~ :a., t.ITTLa CANADA ROAD SVIU ~SO SAJl'fT , AUI. KINHJ<$OU J!1l7 TEL: U2.490-UGd PAX, U2.UO.~26' To: SeQt+ Er,eJ<fAn ':f~-6-~81.33 Fnowt: &~ I1uhjlotw~ ~1c-10l"t$" ~ ';'~~.s ;t\dvJnJ +{.~ ""'4. February 11, 1997 Scott B. Erickson City Engineer City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Subj: Phase II Wetland Replacement Plan I Design and Inspection Dear Mr. Erickson; '\ Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with a proposal on this project. The proposed roads in Phase II will impact wetland areas on the property. This will require another Replacement Plan as was done in Phase 1. Also, the mitigation for tbe wetland impacts in Phase I as well as Phase; 11 will need to be addressed at tbis time. The wetland that was graded without approval from Coon Creek Waters bed will need to be addressed as well. This is a touchy issue and will nor be taken lightly by the agencies. The following is an estimate to the cost for these services: Meetings and cOITespondence with agencies involved: Estimated - 28 hours Sequencing report I Replacement Plan for Phase II: Estimated - 35 hours Design and Field Inspection of mitigation wetlands: Estimated - 24 hours All work will be conducted by a Staff Biologist(Bob Fashingbauer) at a rate of $65.00 I hr. Mileage will be charged at $0.30 I mi. Total - 87 hours @ $65.00/hr. = $5,655.00 + mileage / PROF. ENGR. CONSULT. 4909265 . , '- / You will only be charged on a time and mileage basis with the total cost not to exceed $6,000.00. Thus, the final cost could be considerably less if all goes smoothly with the agencies involved. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to calL Respectfully, Professional Engineering Consultants, Inc. ~:I~ Robert Fashing'bauer Staff Biologist Accepted By: (Title) (Date) " -- / P.02 . To: The Mayor and City Council Members, City of Andover From: Greg Larson and Patty Lindstrom, Home Owners and residents adjacent to the north of the Nature area. 1294 141st Lane NW, Andover, MN Subject: Proposed Paved Path through City Nature Park located East of Hanson Boulevard. Present Usage: Non-Motorized - Horse and Walking Trail- Nature . Present Conditions: Gravel Bed Horse and Walking Trail. Pickar Fields, creek, trees and a whole lot of them dam moles. Various wildlife, geese, ducks, mink, fox, deer, raccoon, eagles, owls, weasel, bluebirds, cardinals, Orioles and a wide variety of other song birds. Dear Mayor and Council Members, By 'Yay of this letter it is our wish to bring to your attention our concerns and views regarding this proposed path through the Nature Park and its potential and possible effects it may produce for the residents and City of Andover as a whole. Patty and I are the sole authors of this letter. We do not want this to be taken in any way as representing anyone else other than ourselves. For all that follows, the words us or we refers to Patty and I solely. We wish to address the fairness of the proposed path. Its location, its cost, present and future, who will benefit, and who stands to loose. Is the present plan fair to the adjacent home owners, all other residents, of and the City of Andover? To ensure fairness to all parties, are we up to speed (present day) usage of these paved park paths, or, are we following a plan conceived and developed years ago which could not have possibly conceived the changes occurring in the next 8 years. Safety; we believe should be a major consideration in any plans of the City of Andover considers. We also believe the City of Andover is safety conscious and desires to incorporate this aspect into their considerations. We believe the publicized intent for this paved path is to provide safety, however, it leaves us to wonder if this is true. Or were the developers and or promoters of this path simply short sighted. We believe that safety has not been accomplished ifby providing a safety item it creates several other un-safe conditions. 1 .. ."--- ~.--,--, .- --"'~"".""';":M",,~,,;,"'~,'h"':"'--'...-*;-,.._.....";'I>o;~"r"""'-,J,.'"..~........."'-...-..~.:;;\> Is this project financially feasible at this time? We question this and where the money is coming from for the City's portion of the cost. If the City has appropriate money available for this project, perhaps alternate plans could be adopted that would save cost by making use of existing facilities already paid for and provide a greater measure of safety. Weare left to wonder if crime prevention is an aspect of safety that has been included in this updated, expanded version of the paved path or is that being left up to "Everyone Fend for Themselves"? When this subject was brought up at the informational meeting, it was suggested that this along with clean-up could become a neighborhood project. If the neighborhood is unable or unwilling to do this, will this then become the responsibility of the City or another tax burden for the residents. Is the City prepared for this or will this area become like so many other communities, "residents stay away." First of all lets start with the premiss that all adjacent landowners were aware or should have been made aware by their builders that at some point and time a nature tail was going to be built in this nature area. Although it may sound harsh, we agree with the City Engineer, Scott Erickson, that if we weren't told this by our builder, we should take this matter up with them and not the City. We believe it would be unfair to all residents of Andover if this area were to be left in its presept condition. It could be developed into a beautiful area yet still retaining its original intended use that all residents could enjoy and be proud of. It would be unfair to all residents of the City if it were left to become an accepted extension to the adjacent land owners back yards. Gary Gorham was the builder of our home. He and Tony Emerich were the developers of the property our home is built on. When we purchased our home and property from Gorham Builders, Gary thoroughly explained to us that the nature area would some day have a path running through it East to West. It would include access from the neighborhoods to the North and South of the area. This was clearly shown on the development plans in his office. What he couldn't tell us was the exact location, North and South, where it would be built. We paid a premium price for our lot to have our home located overlooking the nature park. We considered it a real benefit and a personal enjoyment to be close to nature. For the life of me, I couldn't remember any talk or information about this path going anywhere specific or being connected to anything else. It was shown and described as a nature path thorough a nature park. I called Gary to question him regarding this. He informed me that previously to and in 1992 when we purchased our property this expansion was not in the plan. Connecting this to future paths and Bunker Hills Park is a recent expansion of the plans that has come about in the last couple of years. We feel it is unfair to us too have the original plans greatly expanded without first contacting us for our input. Especially when it could have a drastic affect on the value of and the very reason we purchased this property. We believe fairness here can only be achieved by staying with the original plan and leaving this a Community Nature Park. 2 , . ",.., '-_';--'_-:"~"'!;-:.~-."'l>:'""--,""""'.":,,,....~..;.."'.,;,. .,......~~"'-~_,;,"'~_"'" ,"<.-l:I\ --":<K~'''''__''_~'J<<~ We question the fairness of the proposed location of the path. At present there is a non motorized gravel bed, horse and walking trail running East and West along the northern boundary of the area. Located directly under this is the City of Andovers' main water and sewer lines. If the paved path is placed here as proposed, is it fair to us (living on the northside) that all of our privacy is lost while property to the south retains all of their present privacy? If their is a negative or positive affect on property values is it fair that only one side shares, or is burdened with the brunt of this? We think not. Property owners on both sides should share in this equally. To achieve fairness here the path, if or when it is built, should be placed in the middle of the area running East and West placing the path down the middle. also creates a fair solution to the loss of privacy. A buffer zone is created on both sides of the path. These areas could be partially used to plant pine trees. These would provide a needed boost to the nature aspect of the area, enhance the visual value of the landscape and in time replace some of the lost privacy to the adjacent properties. Two weeks ago we received a notice for an informational meeting regarding this proposed path. Approximately 25 citizens took the time to attend this meeting. Granted they were all home owners whose property borders with the nature area, Of the people attending, one person was in favor of the path. One person said he would use it if it were put in but would rather not have it at the edge of his back yard. The balance were all strongly against it. The poin~ of this is that not one other person in favor or opposing the proposed path found it important enough to attend the meeting. This leads me to wonder how many people from our community would actually use this paved path. Are we building it for the residents and taxpayers of Andover or for people outside of our community (transients)? If it is for the latter, is it fair to the residents of Andover to use this land and spend money for this purpose? We think not. At this meeting we were expressing our concerns, asking for information, trying to develop solutions or alternatives to the present proposed path. It seemed we hit a dead end on every issue. After direct questioning, it was fmally revealed to us that this was far past the proposed stage. Construction was scheduled to begin within two months, May 1997 at the latest. The topics picked up some intensity at this point. We tried restating our concerns and were met by the response, "Tough' from Tom Anderson, I believe to be from the City's Parks Commission. The City Engineer, Scott Erickson, and the balance of the people from the Parks and Recreation supported their position 011 how much work has already gone intouthis plan and that it was going ahead as scheduled. We have all had to face disappointment when our plans have fallen through or we encounter opposition to them. Is this fair or unfair, I don't know. The question I didn't ask though is if all of them are volunteers, or is this the work they are being paid to do? I was amiss in this. 3 However, we do feel it is unfair of our City employees to present something as one thing only to find it is something entirely different. We feel it is unfair that we had to repeatedly ask the same and similar questions to fmally receive the facts. Is there some reason to hide or mask information? We feel it was totally unfair to change and expand the original plan and make preparations to proceed without fIrst contacting the parties who would be directly affected by these changes. We feel it is unfair to be verbally discounted, negated and dismissed by public officials. There is still a question as to motorized traffic on this proposed trail. The present gravel bed. horse trail is marked NON-MOTORIZED. We have experienced many problems with A TV's and motor cycles using this area during the summer. This past winter has been snowmobiles. Two members of the Sno-Dragons visited our next door neighbors after they had called to register a complaint. As talk got around to the new proposed paved path, these members stated that if they paid the additional cost to bring the pavement up to a class 5, snowmobiles would be able to use the trail during the winter months. They stated the source of this agreement to be the DNR. The City Engineer and park's people state this is not so, that i~ would be a non motorized trail. I fmd it hard to imagine that this snowmobile club dreamed this up. Has anyone closely scrutinized the DNR's agreement and conditions of their $50,000.00 grant for this project. We would consider it totally unfair if this trail were made seasonal motorized now or at any future date. The City Engineer stated the reason for this path is to create a safe corridor for the children of Andover to reach areas like Bunker Hills Park and Andover's Recreation Center. We question this, no provisions have been made to get the children safely across Bunker Hills and Hanson Boulevard, such as a tunnel under the road or a bridge over these roads. They did state they would be installing traffic controls, which after much direct questioning turned out to be small stop signs on the ends of these trails where they cross these busy roads. I know how well children pay attention to these signs. Hanson Boulevard has four way stop signs which will help. However Bunker Lake Boulevard does not. In fact it is a high speed thoroughfare. The west bound traffic approach comes out of a hill and a blind curve. Majestic Oaks Golf Course, which is located on a straight stretch, built a tunnel under Bunker Lake Boulevard. This is for adults driving golf carts to the course located south of Bunker Lake Boulevard. Yet we the City of Andover fmd it acceptable to encourage our children to cross this high speed, busy road without stopping traffic. Even if we put traffic lights at this crossing, would you want your children taking this risk? We certainly would not. If someone is injured or killed at this crossing with to days lawsuits, would the City of Andover be considered partly responsible and be liable for damages? If we are truly considering the safety of our children, we would not consider a tunnel as a safe alternative. 4 , k,,--.,'-;"-,7,,-~:;:,\,:t~:)::;\~;:::::C':;;~.~:~:t''T~-\':-;~~~;.~~~~~~~.r~ They are dark and a predator could use this condition to their advantage. I would think a fenced-in bridge would be the safest solution. Coon Creek which runs through the bottom, south side of the nature area, is not what we would think to be termed, children safe. The banks are loose, crumbling sand and are extremely steep. The water is often high and fast moving. When a dog goes into it, they are completely worn out from their efforts getting back out of it. Most children in the neighborhood are told to stay out of this area due to these conditions. However with this paved path we are now encouraging these children and children who are not aware of these conditions to go into this area. In light of all the problems, other communities are experiencing with Roller Bladers, Skate Boarders, high speed bikers and pedestrians tying to use the same path, are we are making a wise safe decision putting in a paved path? Most traffic using the paved path will be fast such as roller blades. Today mountain bikes travel at speeds in excess of 40 mph. These are certainly not conducive to pedestrians. In fact it may fall under the heading of dangerous to walk on these paths. Last summer the news was full of other communities experiencing these vel)' same problems. Must our City blunder into the same situation. What will be the future cost be ifwe have to build a second path to provide fair access for all the varied uses? If the path absolutely has to be paved, would it not be better to wait to see how other communities will resolve this dilemma before we blunder into the Same situation? The financial portion is the reason we were given to our question why the big push is on to get this project going, were led to understand a time window closes on the $50,000.00 grant by the DNR. We have been told that by using the existing horse trail located on the north side of the nature area the project will cost $250,000.00. We were also told it had not yet been determined how much of the remaining balance, $200,000.00 the City of Andover would be responsible for and how much the County Parks Board would pay. I'm guessing that if the trail is not connected to Bunker Hills Park and or other Anoka County Trails, the County would not contribute or world contribute less. Beyond that this project is scheduled to start in May at the latest according to the City Engineer. As citizens and tax payers of this community, we are wondering how can a proposed project be scheduled to start until costs are on paper in black and white? It was explained to us that Tax $ (dollars) would not be used for this trail but once again after repeated questioning, it was fmally revealed that Andovers money would be coming from a special tax, the Auto Junk Yards Pay. We believe Community Tax Dollars are tax dollars regardless of their origin.e As we mentioned before, the new proposed paved path is to be located on top of the existing gravel trail (which underneath lies Andovers main water and sewer lines). 5 ~, ". ,-,_.,,~.~ "'-'-.'.- ,...-._....~- -,-' '" ""''--,-...,..,''''",..-."'''.... -:"'._,.!;.,.~._,:'C.y~~""'l"'"':"'~tv'""",..),~........~;..,\H~"l:JIN~oQ;,~ ~_ilII- ~_ __ 'l!i'lIW.~""_""'~'''~~'\.a In the past we have asked permission for limited use that allows us to get materials and equipment into our back yards for landscaping projects. These requests were at fIrst refused and then limited to a small truck and or bob cat. The reason for this as explained to me by Scott Erickson, City Engineer, is "after the pipes were laid, they back filled the trench with common earth. This was not substantial enough to support heavy equipment." The back fIll used could allow the pipes to shift, which could result in damage to these lines. The question we have is fIrst of all, our contractors equipment is no heavier or lighter than anyone else. Which makes us think obviously, this project will have to be done with light equipment. How much does this add to the cost? We think it's reasonable to expect these water and sewer lines will age and need repairs. Obviously when this work is needed, we will fIrst have to remove the portion of the paved path to dig the hole to work on the lines. Wait a minute, how will we get heavy equipment to the area with the weight restrictions. Will we have to pay additional cost for light equipment or will we have to damage and repair other areas of the lines and pavement to gain access? ' Who bears the additional cost burdens for these repairs. Even if it is just the additional cost of removing and replacing the asphalt, will it be the City of Andover and the tax payers? Is it fInancially sound to place the cities future maintenance cost in this position? Are we being short-sighted (penny-wise and dollar foolish) by placing a paved path on top of the City's main water and sewer lines when it can be moved a short distance to the center of the area, thus eliminating this future maintenance quagmire. When considering future cost, isn't it financially sound to send the additional money now to provide a new gravel bed in the center of the area for the paved path? This also resolves many other potential problems. In summary we ask your attentive consideration to the fairness, safety, present and future cost of this proposed paved path through the nature park. Is it fair to all parties? The adjacent landowners, all residents and the City of Andover as a whole? From our experience we have to say, no. We already have more than enough paved roads to facilitate roller blading and biking, what is disappearing is places for time to slow down and nature to flourish. A place where people can get away from the high-speed drive of daily life. This area is a place where the residents of our community can experience that. If we pave this, connect it to other paths and parks, if we take outside money from other sources, this possibility will be lost to Andover forever. Is it fair that citizens of Andover are made to feel discounted when the City Government decides to expand the original plans, 6 ,. "0' '" ' ........,~': ,'_',- ,_,..-.~~ "'! - ~-~""-~.~~.~~~;-"-,,,,,':-,j!., ""~~.",' "~;f:.'i;'!~,!,~~.i;c''"':''''':"'~,1~~~JI~ft~s:,~~~'~~ doesn't contact the citizens who are directly affected before they place the plan in motion and then won't listen when concerns are raised? We feel that fairness to all parties is sticking to the original plan. Fairness is placing the path down the middle of the area so neither the north or south sides will stand to gain or loose more than the other side. If the City decides to proceed with the path as is presently scheduled, expanded from the original plan, then the City should be fair. The City should address and guarantee the concerns of the property owners who will be directly affected by their decision. Ifby our good intentions we the City are building this to provide safety for the children of our community, shouldn't we consider all aspects of this project to ensure we are truly accomplishing our goal. Are we truly providing safety for the children if we lead them to an extremely busy high- speed road, place the reward on the opposite side and then not provide the children with a way of safely crossing. Are small stop signs (traffic controls), the children are left to interpret for themselves going to keep our children safe? Have we provided for their safety if by providing this paved path we take them into a dangerous area? An area we have now made publicly accessible to predators. An area this City or any other could afford to provide proper police protection to ensure their safety and protection. Coon' Creek, which runs through this nature park, has what we would consider reasonable water running in it. However it is actually more like a Venus-Fly-Trap. This is due to the soft crumbling soil on the river banks. Have we achieved safety by providing this path when in other communities the cry is already being heard their paths are not safe anymore due to the high-speed activities taking place on them? Must we make the same mistakes? Must we blunder fOlward and provide the very same unsafe conditions other communities are trying to fmd a way out of? We question the financial feasibility of this project at this time. Yes of course, 20% or $50,000.00 is not pocket change. It is a respectable amount of money. However we do question what we are giving up for this and the counties portion. Is Andover selling its autonomy over this piece of land? Are we changing a nature area to a recreational area for -- . the price of asphalt? Are we jeopardizing citizens property values and safety to save some dollars now? Things look bright now. What if it doesn't work so well? What if the residents of Andover decide it was a bad idea? Will we be able to shut it down or will the county and the DNR prevent this because they have invested in it also? Will they at some later date be able to change the usage of this path because they provided funds? Who will bear the financial burden for clean-up, repairs and policing of this area? No matter how we look at it, it will end up being the tax payer. Regardless of whether it's the State, County or City, the tax payer will pick-up the tab. We are willing to bet in most cases or at least the largest cost will fall on Andovers back. Who 7 . - \.. "'.--c,',') ,',"'~"'."'..~<.>.l-.q:,..,'<. ~ :1,.,'-.."'""...,,........,~_...,!..Wlo!',...O:;'.~......,,..~~';l~, - .-" ~.::.YlI will be financially responsible for the additioinal policing cost. Who will be fmancially responsible liable and when the ambulance chasing attorneys point their fmgers at who provided access to an unsafe condition? Who will be fmancially responsible to the adjacent property owners if they experience a rise in crime due to assesebilty to their home this public path will create? Who will be financially responsible if the value of their property decreases or they have a harder time selling their property as a result of this paved, interconnected, path? Yes, outside money is available. Would it still be available if we didn't connect this path with the outside areas? We do not believe it is in Andovers best fmancial interest to commit itself to this at the present time just because outside money is available. Andover is risking all the future fmancial burdens this proposed paved path presents. Patty and I do not see where proceeding with this project is fair to all parties concerned. In fact we see it as "we are being treated very unfairly." In fact if this paved path proceeds as proposed, the property owners located to the north side of this nature area will bear the full brunt ofloss of privacy, the potentail for added crime and property devaluation. All of this because the City wishes to save the cost of providing a new gravel sub-base for the proposed paved path. This proposed paved path is unfair, unsafe and full of fmancial pit falls. Several other possi~le solutions were presented at the informational meeting by citizens. Solutions that may not be financially feasible this year but certainly will be in the future. These solutions included using our already well paved slow traffic, publicly visual, safe neighborhood streets. Plans like these relieve the financial burden of providing new services and facilities. Plans such as these help save tax payer dollars instead of promoting tax growth. We respectfully urge you to carefully review your poisition. Please give our concerns your undivided attention and decide for yourself if this proposed paved path meets the standards of fairness, safety and is it truly fmancially feasible and in the communities best interest. Thank you. Sincerely, !!:JJ:!d\M",- ~L~\#~ Patty Lt'dstrom 8 ';~", <'_L''''''''~':'''-'~''~__:;''''_''';>'''~';_'''~:'1'''''.~'';fji;".;,"".!'='f,,~lt.'~~......,~'Z~... Developed by: , 'Gorham Builders, Inc. 421-0998 , . Tony Emmerich Const.Inc. 755-6554 ................. ...... " " i-, SoC:{~/r': .' \-\,~\s--. O~ %LLL&-~R-lv+\c~ .-.. "---'C"_'""1'-",=""',-~"~_"'~'-'~^'(_'_'f,""F""~"Y".~~"'O!O~_~~~~'~"''''''~'''''''''''l'''''~:'~,:_ 900.00 8,100.00 TO:. \MaYOr and ~ity. Cou_ncil... _. FROM: David Almgren r I . .--.- --. - -- -.-. . - . RE: ,1997 Monthly Report Form JANUARY BUILD:r:,:::":~:bI4 S~1L'f Pf";;::::3.. ~,i2~~50 JO~.. ~962.43 --. [Additions .... ---.-- -.--.-.' . --.. - [ _ ._.._..__ .n__~ _'__"..'_ .__. ...____._._. .__~.__.n I Garages 1 \ Remodeling/Fin~h-in~g' .--. ~. _ I~TQi().53 - t~)4~()q_ '$---:J,O! 4.53 .\ ~~~~~~~k~~~I~ing- Sheds . [~~....:_____-= Swimming Po?ls_________.____ Chimney/Stove/Fireplace iStructural changes"- - _n' _u' ------ 11 Porches/Decks m - - -.- - - --$ 1!Repair Fire Damage .. ---'--$---.' .... IRe-Roof .. - ---- - u__ ---- - - ____ ___ ___ ..._ .-____0-_- Other l- I $ I i PERMITS 81~~i1~~1~i~:rmits- :~-~-'= I Curb Cut i Demolition \F(~ot~ng __ _____ . __ ___ __ _ 11 Ren~wal _$ 28.62 \MOVing .' _ _ -P . 1;1~::~:~~ Re~air~:=~_- _ _- =-=t~- ___~~~:~~ ::~~ ~ .4 (H-"ok Up '__n_~$__ 100.0ll.. __n____~~Q. $ 191 Plum.bing :.._ _n __J$ 2,381.15 9.5Q _t___2,390.6~- 51 Plul!lbing Repair . __I' $ 402.55 2.50 L__ --. -. 45! Puml'ing -i ___ $ 135.00 $ 1 [Septic . '_ u_ _ $ 35.00 $-- 0.50 $--- -- -.----- -. 1~\~~;;c~:~~f~::~p~ncY--~~ {:~. 2~~:~%._L_____ __u____--------... . 31lContractor's License-.r---- _$ - 775.00 4!License Verification Fee _ $ 20.00 :\E~:~~:~~ ~f== r ~~~ == - =1 :=-~~~ = - - \ Rein_spectio~ _FEle___ ' - - - 1 . - I - -- ___L -- - - -- I --. [Total Number of Houses YTD.I 1996 15 , -----.------- --+ --- - ------ -- ,Total Valuation YTD -j_1997i .. . .. ,$._668,000.00_- Total Valuation YTD -! 1996, ' $1,692,293.00 : -- - - - . - .. - - - - ..- Total Building Department Income YTD - 1997i i $ 14,117.27 i TTotalBuilding Departmenflncome YTD -1996i 1-$- 27,684~951-- I ., i. --- r c:. V "$.u:L ~ s-(c::p CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 Special City Council Workshop Tuesday, February 25, 1997 Meeting Location: Public Works Building (Use West Entrance) Call to Order - 7:00 PM 1. Discuss Public Works Building 2. Discuss future Public Works addition 3. Salt storage options for 1997 and beyond 4. Needs Assessment of Streets and Highways Department 5. Needs Assessment of Parks Maintenance Department 6. NeedsAssessment of Water and Sewer Department 7. Needs Assessment of Vehicle Maintenance Department ~ C. Q... mT':) . -F~/~/9?7 RECEIVED FEB 1 3 1997 CITY OF ANO(jVi:R Ando~el' MSNO-DRA6DNSw Snowmobile Club P.O. Box 671 Anob, MN 55303-0671 Infol'malion line: 767-2555 February 11, 1997 Dear Sno Dragons Member, On Tuesday, January 28th, both the Board of Directors and the General Membership voted unanimously to make a donation $100.00 to each of the memorial funds set up for Stacy Schlosser and Joshua Renken. Both Stacy, of East Bethel, and Joshua, of Big Lake, were struck and killed by snowmobiles earlier this season. During the meeting, it was also suggested that the opportunity to contribute to the donation be offered to all club members. This is a voluntary donation, and all money received by the club will be divided equally between both of the memorial funds, unless otherwise specified. If you would like to make a donation, please make your check payable to: The Andover Sno Dragons, and either mail it, by March 1st, to the address shown above, or bring it to the March 11th General Meeting at Majestic Oaks. T~ Rick Ericksen President P.S. This is just a reminder that our Annual Meeting will be held on Tuesday, March 25, 1997, at Majestic Oaks, at 7:30 p.m. Appetizers and hors d'ouvers will be served. Bring the entire family. See you there!! ~ ce. ~ -f~{Z;I'19'7 SHERIFF LARRY PODANY INVITES YOU RECEIVED FES 1 3 1997 CITY OF ANDOVER INFORMATIONAL MEETING VVednesday,FebruaryI9,1997 7:00 p.m. OAKVIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL 15400 Hanson Blvd. Andover Topic: Sex Offender Community Notification On January 1, 1997, a new law took effect requiring law enforcement agencies in Minnesota to provide adequate notice to the community concerning soon-to-be released sex offenders who will be living in their neighborhood. Providing appropriate community notification is not an easy task. It takes the cooperation of many agencies and individuals to carry this out. The Anoka County Sheriffs Office is sponsoring an informational meeting to learn more about the notification process: I I how it works, how it will affect you, and how it will affect your community. Please join us on the above date. The meeting will last approximately 1-1/2 hours. If you have questions or would like more information on the program c nt, please contact Investigator Karin Small, Anoka County Sheriffs Office, at 323-50 . DATE February 18. 1997 ITEMS GIVEN . TOTHECITY COUNCIL Special City Council Meeting Notice - February 25. 1997 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - January 28 1997 City Council Minutes - February 4. 1997 Park & Recreation Commission - February 6 1997 Letter from Rick Erickson Sno Dragons - February 11. 1997 Memo from Vicki Volk - February 12. 1997 Sheriff Larry Podany Informational Meeting Notice 1997 Monthly Building Report Form - January Ordinance No. 33G Ordinance No. 1 D8A Anoka County Public Officials Guide Schedule of Bills .. .... .. . PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING ORPUTTHEM ON THE NEXT AGENDA. . . THANKYOU. ..