The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC February 3, 1998 CITY of ANDOVER Regular City Council Meeting - February 3, 1998 agenda 6:15 PM - Park & Recreation Commission Interviews Call to Order - 7:00 PM Resident Forum Agenda Approval Consent Agenda Approval of Minutes Discussion Items 1. Anoka County Sheriff Report 2. Lot Split, Continued/17203 Tulip Street NW/Johnson 3. Discussion, Continued/Approve Final Plat/Chesterton Commons 2nd Addition 4. Timber River EstateslPark Dedication Discussion 5. Update of Drainage Issue/2776-164th Avenue NW/JeffLeadens 6. Sketch Plan/Andover Planned Unit Development 7. Sketch PlanlBurr Oak Run 8. Outlot AI Brandon's Lakeview Estates Staff. Committees. Commissions 9. Appoint Park & Recreation Commission Vacancy 10. Appoint Chair & Vice Chair/Park & Recreation Commission II. Appoint Chair & Acting ChairlPlanning & Zoning Commission Non-Discussion/Consent Items 12. Acknowledge Expiration Amended Special Use Pennit/96-I61l3727 Hanson Blvd NW/SA asupsa 13. Acknowledge Expiration Amended Special Use Pennit/96-25/I3476 Hanson Blvd NW/Shoberg asupshoberg 14. Approve MIS Contract/City of Champlin miscontract 15. Approve Change Orders/96-I5IPublic Works cos9615 16. Order Plans & Specs/98-3/Cracksealing ord983 17. Approve Plans & Specs/98-3/Cracksealing appr983 18. Order Plans & Specs/98-4/Sealcoating ord984 19. Approve Plans & Specs/98-4/Sealcoating appr984 20. Approve Supplemental Feasibility Report/97-44/Shadowbrook 3rd Addition appr9744 21. Accept Withdrawal ofComp Plan Amend/18Ist Ave and Round Lake BlvdJRademacher rademacher 22. Kennel Licnese RenewaVCleo Nehrt kennel Mayor/Council Input Payment of Claims Adjournment Bookmark Name sheriff Isjohnson fpchesterton timber drainage andoverpud burroak brandons p&rvacan chairpr chairpz 7 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '. / DATE: February J, 1998 AGENDA SECTION Approval of Minutes ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Citr Clerk ll.u. ITEM NO. Approval of Minutes The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes: January 20, 1998 Regular Meeting (Dehn absent) January 20, 1998 EDA Meeting (Dehn absent) January 20, 1998 HRA Meeting (Dehn absent) -' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \ '. ) DATE: February 3. 1998 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Administration Richard Fursman ITEM NO. I ' Anoka County Sheriff Monthly Report BACKGROUND: The Anoka County Sheriff s Department will be present to provide the Council and the citizens of Andover an update on happenings around the City and also introduce new officers. , CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 3. 1998 ITEM NO. Lot Split 97-08 17203 Tulip Street NW Tom & Shareen Johnson 2, ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning John Hinzman, 1~ City Planner AGENDA SECTION Discussion Item, Cont. Request The City Council is asked to review the lot split request of Tom and Shareen Johnson to split the northern and eastern +/- 7.9 acres from a 10.5 acre parcel located at 17203 Tulip Street NW (PIN 08- 32-24-12-0014), zoned R-I, Single Family Rural. A cul-de-sac intersecting Tulip Street is proposed in conjunction with Ihe lot split, eliminate the need for variances for lot width at front setback for both lots. The location of the lot in relation to street intersections on the west side of Tulip Street NW inhibits a full intersection with the proposed cul-de-sac (see attached maps). The applicant has approached the property owners to the north and south about constructing a joint access from 172nd Lane or 172nd A venue. Both parties stated a reluctance to participate. City Council Action This item was tabled at the request of the applicant at the January 20, 1998 City Council Meeting to explore whether the present road easement is private or public. Plannin!!: and Zonin!!: Commission Action The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 3-2 (2 absent) to recommend denial of the lot split at the November 25, 1997 meeting. The Commission cited poor road location, negative cost of road, and concerns over whether the application is a lot split or plat as reasons for denial. Attachments I Attached for your information are the following: . Resolution for denial . City Council Minutes, 1/20/98 . Letter from Tom Johnson, 17203 Tulip Street -- applicant. . Letter from Jim Lindahl, 17275 Tulip Street -- neighbor . Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes, 11/25/97 . Planning and Zoning Staff Report, 11/25/97 \ ) CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTYOFANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -98 A RESOLUTION DENYING THE LOT SPLIT REQUEST OF THOMAS AND SHAREEN JOHNSON PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 40 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17203 TULIP STREET NW (PIN 08-32-24-12-0014). WHEREAS, Thomas and Shareen Johnson, have requested to split the northern and eastern +/- 7.9 acres from a 10.5 acre parcel located at 17203 Tulip Street NW, legally described as follows: That part of the North 694 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 32N, Range 24W, Anoka County, Minnesota lying southerly of the north 330 feet thereof except the south 34 feet of the north 364 feet of the west 660 feet thereof, except road, subject to easements of record. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request does not meet the criteria of Ordinance No. 40; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of Andover; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was opposition to the request; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council denial of the lot split as requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and denies the lot split on said property with the following conditions: I. Poor road location; inability to service future lots. 2. Negative cost to the city for road construction; would only serve one person. 1998. Adopted by the City Council ofthe City of Andover on this 3rd day ofFebruarv. / . \ Page Two \~) LS 97-08, Johnson 17203 Tulip NW February 3,1998 CITYOF ANDOVER ATTEST: Victoria V olk, City Clerk , ,.j J.E. McKelvey, Mayor \ , ) Regu.'ar Alldol'e1" City Cvuncil.Heeling ,\fill/lti!,\ - .Ialluary ::0. /998 Page -' (j)LOTSPLlT/1720J TUUPST ~\.lr. Hinzman requested the item be tabled per the request of the applicant. Tom Johnson 17203 Tulip Street - explained they started this process in 1992 when they were requesting a variance to access their property on the east. That was denied. This year they drew up a plan, tim with a 34-foot strip to the north, then with a plan for a cul-de-sac which did meet all ordin~nce requirements, The Planning Commission was not in favor of the cul-de-sac and asked them to talk to homeo,^,ners to the north and south about building a road which conforms to the City stanJards. They did that. The homeoviOer to the south was interested at first, but then changed his mind. Over the weekend they looked at their abstract and found what they thought was a driveway to the house is actually a road easement. At this time it is a question as to whether it is a dedicated p~,biic or private easement. They are asking the item be tabled to research that question further. Counciimcmber Orttel stated it appears the City is asking Mr. Johnson to plat the entire area with his I O-acre par.:e1. He felt the simplest thing would be to allow' Me Johnson to split on Tulip and grant <1 v:lr.ance on wi~th. In his opinion there is no difference between a driveway and a cul-de-sac except t":'.( t:!~ City wo:.lid have to maintain a cul-de-sac, ,\INioll by Krjght. S;:condea ty Ortte!. to table this until the next meeting. ~[otion carried on a 4- Ye~. I-.-\bsent (Dehn) \'ote. APPRUVE FI.\A.L PIA FCHESTERTOS COJ/.\1OI'.iS 2SD ADDlTIOS Jt:~i \: s<.:hitl didn't understand what Item 10 of the stipulation (Contingent on Stafl' review and ai'P~:jva! for \; liance with City ordinances, policies and guidelines) was referring to, As far as he kncms. they have' mpleted everything they have been asked to do Councilmember Orttel also qL:~jtioned the stateme as it appears with this that Staff would have the final approval, not the Ct}L::1..:iL He thought the Ceil had asked that this statement be removed from Resolutions ap;1roving final pLus \!r. Carlberb x lained the reason for the statement is to allow Staff to look at t:l~ mylars and ask the dev'eloper to n .e any corrections. Co,,:lciimcrnber Knight was concerned with the na . a of 155th. It is very ditticult and fntstrating w:1en one street has three ditferem names. ~Tr. Windsc' and the other Councilmembers agreed. Mr Erickson explained the police and Fire Department worK m a grid system which eliminates pvtential confusion in tinding a specitic location. The grid also eh . ates the possibility of having 1\\0 idef1ticaI int~rs~ctions in the City. " , ./ \: r \VinJschitl also asked t(lr some help with the post office or the postal truck terml I. Apparently tht:r.:: is no landscape plan. no building plan. no lighting plan. nor a fencing plan in the Cit . The City Las :'c:t col!ected any tees !Tem the post office project nor is any1hing being inspected. Apparently the t;;,ler,lI g0vemmem has [he authority to do this. It is a huge building. As an adjacent property owner, \. Mr. Mayor and City Council members; January 15, 1998 On November 25, 1997 the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that our lot split application be denied. After much discussion it was determined that, even though it met all ordinance requirements, the proposal was bad from a planning perspective for two reasons. One. The proposed cul-de-sac does not match up with the streets to the west. Two. There was a concern about accessing the easterly portion of our land. After further discussion Chairperson Peek and Commissioner Gamache felt the logical place for access to the property was across from l72nd. Ave., that it would provide more flexibility for future development. We were advised by the commissioners to contact the landowners to the south to see about building a conforming road on the road easement servicing our house and two others. They showed an initial interest and we decided to table our scheduled council meeting to give them time to talk to city staff, contractors, builders,etc. They eventually decided that at this time they would not be interested in improving the road easement. Our neighbor to the north was also contacted and had no interest in improvements at this time. This brings us back to where we started. We came up with a proposal, with the guidance of city staff, to access our property. IT DOES MEET ALL TIIE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR LOT SPLIT. The fact that it doesn't look good for future development is the problem. We've asked city staff to provide other options but none have been offered. There seems to be no perfect solution. It was suggested by the Planning and Zoning Commission that, for now, access could be granted off the road easement and then a road could be constructed across from l72nd Ave in the future. This would solve both problems the P&Z offered as reasons for denial of the lot split. It would make good future planning sense and would also access the easterly portion of the property. It was also suggested that this option would require a variance. We have lived at this residence for 19 years. In 1992 we applied for a variance to access this property along the 34 foot strip to the north. We were denied because of footage requirements at setback on a conforming road. This decision was accepted with the understanding that what was needed was a conforming road. Our request to the City Council would be to either accept our lot split application or grant a variance to access the property off the road easement until the time comes when the road can be improved. If you should have any questions, suggestions, etc., please feel free to call us at 753-4755. This issue is extremely important to us. Thank you. \ \ / RECEIVED :tAN 1 51998 CITY OF ANDOVER Sincerel~ \. \.'1 \~L~'~ (' tV,- RECEIVED To all Andover City Council Members: JAN061998 CITY OF ANDOVER Re: Lot Split 17203 Tulip Street I would like to confirm my support of the planning and zoning commission in their recommendation for rejection of the above mentioned lot split as presented at the November 25, 1997 meeting. As the owner of the adjacent property, I reject the current lot split plan for the following reasons: · The development of a cul-de-sac to a distance of 150' in from Tulip Street is the approximate parallel equivalent of my family residence from Tulip Street This is a total change from the planned development of the area and causes a direct impact on my lot planning. . A cul-de-sac with the planned location and arrangement would continue to land lock several more potentially developable land parcels. This design of the lot split does not assist any long range city development plans. . This cul-de-sac will require on-going city maintenance (i.e. plowing, street sweeping & traffic control) for the favor of a single family. I bought my property with the understanding that 300' of road frontage would be required for development and as such with the current property arrangement; no building could occur on the south border of my property. This cul-de-sac could allow for a residence to be built where city ordinance originally identified that no building could occur. An alternate plan which would be more suitable to meeting the intent of Andover's comprehensive plan would require a street to be planned which would allow for potential future lot splits, thus providing a better cost ratio for the street maintenance fees. My lot design and building location does allow for a future extension of 172nd A venue to the east which would allow for better development of land parcels which would remain inaccessible with the allowance of the lot split which is currently in review. Please consider who benefits from this plan and also the future impact and costs which will incurred by the city for a single family to endorse this type of lot split. I feel the city is deviating from the comprehensive plan and creating a hodge podge of street designs which will reflect poorly on the city in future years. Again, I feel the city can reject this plan due to the intent of the comprehensive plan and in the interest of reducing areas of inaccessible land parcels which could potentially be developed in a planned fashion. Sincerely, r~~ ci-i; w /' ~ Jim Lindahl ... .' 17275 Tulip Street NW Andover, MN .~ ; .~ ~. " ~;~ ~ . :;. ~ 3J ~. ,... :t~~... \- '. - .~~" . . .~.~-~~ .. ~ ~ .~.... -t...~:._ 'f!;:'~' t~4 ~"'..... . ::,..._~~~-..- .~ '..rl $ ." -= / , ., , I , /1 '. " I ~.~ ., .....r.._1 :'-~--'A.r-. .,. . ~ ,'..... . ~ . " 'JJ ~ ~. .,. ... ~ i. ~.(~ ~s.. ~ , I / / / ~. '" I .i , I .....j...\... '. ._'~ ~ ~\ ~ .0..; '. '" ~ . L :" f' :-~::.~.-:;:~~j~-:J .... -*. , .-- .-:.::'C"~ ___ ~~ ~, 'i ... ~ -~ \~ ~ . tt- ~ '-.: r- "ST~ -1 I -;':s. */ ~~/ /,,- ~ ~I \j -, ~ .. ._~.~I ~r -S ":::r ~ .._~-."- <. '" . ~ ~ ~I . ~- , \' .. ./ , .... .,.. ,.~ o ~ ;."w;"'" i :~. ---- , , ~ . ' -,_ ....-'!t". J .-.-~,'- "'"'~ -.,. ,. ..._'....c.r..;;.... . . . ~ . ~_._-- . --il, '" t;.e . I I / J..,. ., . "" --..- . I. ,;t?L"''' - - 1 . . Ii , .. -.-..-"-_. ,... .1~ ......__......~__......_ ~__ ..__.,._._...__. '_"'u. I . ..__~~.yV\'~<.:>_-"'Q:iAJJ.l-(JG',:_.BE. Et.~ h _ ('I61L~--__t_6"_~~~, .~: ~Lt\,j('ie:v : uS'G." '.--03=.&:i'[A Gl~,:>~~ PuY 'In.r;-- c.:OMP-- H[.. f-t ~; L- <s'o ..'~ .. ____.". e.-f.1..- . '~--:fk'-'I:Sn~..~.pe;-,.~.O~'.JlO-rt1 J ""._'~~;.,\ ~'.:" ::.t(LO~\'d'.e"". .=?; A'oi-,s rrfst-e-r-rJ::O~ 1. vS"" 0'" IS _._ .' .... __. u __lor;; I rJd .._,~,~~~C=Nh--J __ rJOv0. t{OvJc.t/6-1i H rh~ I~Oad 0 Ff ~llp< 5r-:.;jcJ~/) t,itf;....ro. Sfll-ILI- ,,.J.. . fYly _L-1'1.U/'- T d-~ ,.JO r ,4,..;J, C-.jJlrJ.e= fh,5< ~64';;j(;- .. ~-'~'r;o.j YI }--"-IS~'"--7-0 ~''1'f4fl-S, - . 0- , I , 0 c '" .. I E .. .. ..' - 0 I '" .{. " ..J ClCe a: '" ~ Z . .~ ~ ~ '0 I _oar J ! -< "'.... ~ , " r-. '.. ~ " . t , . , ~ r I i I I I ~ -:::- ~ - :.._~l ..' :, ..' ,...... t .... .. ~.:..;;~~: .1 '.' I I i , i ; I ...;.... " ". '\ ,) Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 25, 199i Page 3 earing: Rezoning - NB to R-.J, 26xx 138th Avenue, C'Jntinued) Motion by Barry, Seconded by We s, rd to the City Council the Staff prepared Resolution presented (approving the rezoning). Motion carried on 7: 16 p.m. + PUBLIC HEARING: LOT SPLIT -17203 TULIP STREET NW - THOMAS AND SHAREEN JOHNSON 7:16 p.m. Mr. Hinzman reviewed the request of Thomas and Shareen Johnson to split the northern and eastern approximately 7.9 acres from a 10.5-acre parcel at 17203 Tulip Street NW. The property is zoned R-l, and the present residence would be located on the 2.6-acre parcel. It is being proposed that a cui de sac be constructed on the west end of the property to provide access to the split property. That cui de sac would be constructed by the applicant and dedicated to the City, and the City would maintain it, Mr. Hinzman reviewed the applicable ordinances. In 1992 the Council denied a variance request to the minimum lot width in order to split the parcel by creating a 34-foot wide s~rip for a driveway from Tulip Street. The application does meet minimum lot requirements with the construction of the cui de sac. The proposal has been submitted to the Anoka County Highway Department, but no comment has yet been received. The proposed lot arrangement may hinder future property subdivision to the eastern half of the property. Commissioner Wells noted the county road through there has deep ditches, plus there is a dangerous curve just to the south. She asked if the county intends to upgrade that road. Mr. Hinzman didn't think the county has indicated any improvements will be made to that street in the near future. Thomas Johnson - stated it is good road where the cui de sac would be located. Mr, Hinzman also explained there is a 34-foot strip that is a separate parcel and is owned by the applicant but is not a part of the application. It would remain as a remnant. The reason the cui de sac is not proposed at that 34-foot strip is that the location would not meet the distance requirement between 172nd Lane and l72nd Avenue. Motion by Barry, Seconded by Wells, to open the public hearing. Motion carried on a 5-Yes, 2- Absent (Luedtke, Squires) vote. 7:26 p.m. \ ) Dean Olson 17132 Round Lake Boulevard - asked why a cui de sac is needed. He felt that hinders future development of the rest of that property. which wouldn't have enough road frontage. Mr. Hinzman reviewed the ordinance requirements for lot width and how those requirements are being met with the construction of the cui de sac. He did not know the feasibility of being able to extend the cui de sac in the future for further development. It would be difficult to utilize the back portion of the acreage from Tulip Street. \ ) Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minlltes - November 25, 1997 Page -I (Public Hearing: Lot Split, 17203 Tulip Street, Johnson, Continued) Mr Olson - didn't think it was good planning to construct the cui de sac, suggesting alternate accesses be looked into. It is expensive, and the taxpayers em; up paying for the maintenance for something that is basically a personal driveway. He doesn't agree with the construction of a cui de sac. Mr. Hinzman stated the construction of the cui de sac would be the responsibility of the property owner. Thomas Johnson 17203 Tulip Street NW - stated they have been going through this process for quite a few years. The most he could ever get out of the eastern portion of the property is two lots because ofthe low land. It isn't economically feasible to install 1300 feet of road to subdivide the property. They have worked with the City to come up with a plan that meets all the requirements. That 34-foot strip of land to the north could be tied into the lot split. Motion by Wells, Seconded by Gamache, to close the public hearing. Motion carried on a 5-Yes, 2-Absent (Luedtke, Squires) vote. 7:31 p.m. Chairperson Peek questioned whether this is a lot split because a cui de sac is being constructed and dedicated to the City. He felt it becomes a platting situation. Mr. Hinzman stated Staff has been looking at as a lot split and a street dedication, with the provisions of the Lot Split Ordinance being followed. The cui de sac would be built to specifications and would have to be dedicated to the City before the lot split could be executed. Commissioner Barry noted there is a lot of undeveloped land to the east. She had a concern that the proposal prevents the possible future development of the eastern half of the parcel. Motion by Wells, Seconded by Barry, that this is bad public policy because of the road coming off CoRd 58. It is negative for the cost to the City, It is questionable whether this is actually a true lot split or a platting situation. She proposed the P & Z recommend denial. DISCUSSION: Commissioner Barry felt there needs to be more exploration of a possible road system through there. She didn't feel what is being proposed here is a good idea for the entire area. Mr. Johnson - stated they can't afford to construct a road all the way across the property for one lot. The rest of the land is low and unbuildable. Mr. Hinzman noted there is a pond in the northeast corner of the existing lot, plus the southern portion of the lot is wet. There was some discussion ",ith the audience about constructing a road at the location of the 34-foot parcel to the north, Mr. Hinzman explained the street jog requirements are not met at that location. ~-) Shareen Johnson - stated they have been going through this for quite a while. They can't put the road on the 34-foot strip. This is the only thing they came up with to split their land. They are trying to tollow the requirements, and this proposd does that. They would welcome any suggestions. Tthey do not own the easement to the south. Mr Olson - noted the easement to the south is the access for three dwellings in the back, but the City \ ,) Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 25, 1997 Page 5 (Public Hearing: Lot Split, 17203 Tulip Street, Johnson, Continued) doesn't maintain it. If the easement turned at the corner, it would provide a good access to the back of the lot in question. Mr Johnson - stated they have been told over and over by the City that that is not a road easement, only an ingress and egress for the three houses. That would be the more feasible and logical access the property, but it is not their land and it does not meet the requirements of the City. They are just doing what they have been told by the City. The discussion continued on alternative means of an access to the property rather than constructing the cui de sac as proposed. Commissioner Gamache felt the logical place for a future access to the property is across from 172nd Avenue. For now, all they would need is permission from the owner to the south. It would be cheaper than building a cuI de sac now, then a road could be built across from 172nd Avenue in the future. With the location of a cui de sac as proposed, there would be no way to build a road to get to the back. Mr. Hinzman stated the setback of the current house would have to be reviewed if a 60-foot right of way is dedicated to the south. A variance may be needed. The cui de sac cannot be moved to 172nd Avenue because it wouldn't be on the applicant's property. Also. he is not sure how a dedicated city street at 172nd would affect those properties in the back that are now being served by that easement. Chairperson Peek and Commissioner Gamache both felt a road going east at 172nd Avenue would prO\ide a lot more tlexibility for future development. Chairperson Peek felt what is being proposed is not a lot split because there will be street construction and roadway dedicated to the City, It is a band aid solution. It is the Commission's charge to look at this from a planning perspective, and a road alignment at l72nd pro\oides a much better layout. Conunissioner Bany felt the roads going east should be consistent with those coming from the west. Commissioner Wells was again concerned \\ith the safety of the road, especially with adding another access. Commissioner Gamache suggested the Johnsons talk with the owners to the south to develop a cui de sac at 172nd Avenue and possibly using the road easement as a driveway to the existing house, Or build the road to where the easement turns south to provide access to the back of their lot. lI.lotion carried on a 3-Yes (Peek, Barry, Wells), 2-No CApel, Gamache) vote. This will be on the December 16, 1997, City Council agenda. 8:02 p.m. ~ .----. . . : REGISTERED LAND SURVEY - SECTION 34 '. , ) 8:02 p.rn. NIr. Carlberg reviewed the r by Country Ridge, Inc., for a Registered Land Survey in the vicinity of Commercial Boulevard and a oulevard. In 1993 the City filed a plat for right-of-way for Commercial Boulevard which created tw els, one of which is substandard according to the minimum requirements for an I, Industrial lot. A Re . te[~and Survey is done on Torrens property. This property was torrens, so a metes and bounds descriptlcm-eall.llQ!be done. Mr. Carlberg stated it is his understanding the owner intends to combine Track C with the parcel-to the south for a future commercial/industrial site. Another option would be to grant a variance, as Tract C by itself does not meet the minimum lot requirements for the area. The area is zoned '\ , J CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE: November 25. 1997 ITEM NO. 6 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Public Hearing: L.S. 97-08 17203 Tulip Street NW Thomas and Shareen Johnson Planning John Hinzman % City Planner Request The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the lot split request of Thomas and Shareen Johnson to split the northern and eastern +/- 7.9 acres from a 10.5 acre parcel located at 17203 Tulip Street NW (PIN 08-32-24-12-0014) The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Rural. Applicable Ordinances Ordinance 40 regulated the division oflots. A lot split is defined as any division of a lot, parcel or tract ofland into not ore than two (2) parcels when both divided parcels meet or exceed the minimum requirements for a platted lot in the applicable zoning district. Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 establishes the provision for minimum lot width, lot depth and lot area in a R-I, Single Family Rural zoned district. The minimum requirements in a R-I district are as follows: Lot Width at Front Setback on a cul-de-sac Lot Depth Lot Area per Dwelling - 300 feet - 160 feet - ISO feet - 2.5 acres Ordinance 10, Section 9.07.10 establishes the minimum area ofland dedicated to park and open space. For all subdivisions by metes and bounds description the subdivider or developer may elect to pay, in lieu of park dedication requirements, the sum off our hundred dollars ($400.00) for each dwelling unit that could be constructed. \ ) , '\ Page Two LS 97-08, Johnson 17203 Tulip Street NW November 25, 1997 ~~ i Back2round The applicant proposes to split the northern +/- 7.9 acres from a 10.5 acre parcel. A cul- de-sac is proposed in order to accommodate the minimum lot provision for the existing and split parcel. In 1992, a variance was requested to the minimum lot width on the proposed parcel in conjunction with a metes and bounds subdivision ofland. The original proposal would have created a flag lot, with a 34 foot width at Tulip Street NW. The City Council denied the application based on lack of a hardship, and not abiding by the intent of Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 (minimum lot size). ' General Review The addition of the cul-de-sac is necessary to conform the minimum lot size requirements of Ordinance 8, Section 6,02, Anoka County Highway Department has been notified of the proposed cul-de-sac. Comments are pending. The lot arrangement as proposed may hinder future property subdivision to the eastern half of the property. Commission Options I. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City Council approval of the lot split request of Thomas and Shareen Iohnson on property located at 17203 Tulip Street NW, legally described on the attached resolution, The Commission finds the request meets the requirements of Ordinances NO.8 and 40. 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City Council denial of the lot split request of Thomas and Shareen Johnson on property located at 17203 Tulip Street NW, legally described on the attached resolution. The Commission finds the request does not meet the requirements of Ordinances No, 8 and 40. In recommending denial of the request, the Commission shall state those reasons for doing so. 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item pending further information from Staff " j \ '. J " ) Page Three LS 97-08, Johnson 17203 Tulip Street NW November 25, 1997 Attachments A-I Resolution for Approval A-2 Location Map A-3 Site Plan A-4 Lot Split Application A-5 Notice of Public Hearing , \ , i CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -97 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOT SPLIT REQUEST OF THOMAS AND SHAREEN JOHNSON PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 40 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17203 TULIP STREET NW (PIN 08-32-24-12-0014). WHEREAS, Thomas and Shareen Johnson, have requested to split the northern and eastern +/- 7,9 acres from a 10.5 acre parcel located at 17203 Tulip Street NW, legally described as follows: That part of the North 694 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 32N, Range 24W, Anoka County, Minnesota lying southerly of the north 330 feet thereof except the south 34 feet of the north 364 feet of the west 660 feet thereof, except road, subject to easements of record. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has detennined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No. 40 and that based on Section IV, the City Council may vary the application of any of the provisions of the Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of Andover; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no opposition to the request; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the lot split as requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the lot split on said property with the following conditions: 1. That the lot split be subject to a sunset clause as defined in Ordinance No, 40, Section III(E). '. 2. That a certificate of survey for the proposed lot split be submitted to the City of ) Andover. \ J Page Two LS 97-08, Johnson 17203 Tulip.NW November 25, 1997 3, That the applicant pay a park dedication fee of $400 as stipulated in Ordinance 10, Section 9.07,10, 4, That a cul-de-sac to provide access to the existing and newly split parcel be constructed and dedicated to the City. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 16th day of December, 1997. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: lE. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria V olk, City Clerk iJ fV ~I I I ,--;;:;:;; 7~~ 11.11~ CL - I-Hl /"" - 1-- r---l i . ~ R f"::::: v - '( Co - I- - - I~" >- il- ~ K _I-- ~~j ;:j ~ - 12 ~ - - I- - ~ m Z V ~ -,-- I-- I-- - - - l- '\. I-- - /~ $" I - ::: - . - -< -; f- >- -;;1 f- ~L I- - - - - f- rl '\ I-- l- f- ~ -... ~( ~ ~/ \ L:L.? e::- Ve I [0\.:. I, .' ~.... ...... .HI [2, /. I..: l..:'.......: /~ ~ f.' .:-:._>..,:.,L: "., 12 ~ ~ ~:i'.-1 ,)'. E~ ~ I>' ~'-'f V0.~-': t."< .... Irdt ,\ V2 " r I-- '1 \ [, I$-r..:..\. ,.....:i.,l';.;. ~:';;iP~t ;.... ~ ~ .. I.:. L.:..2 - - ...... G'. .... ~ .... ,;',: ....... : 1- l- \ L I-- 1-1.. . I I . ......::- j '<J< ..... '.' ~Ir 1_. ~ ......:.li. - -t..... ~. [f5j -- --::'. - :::r..... . I--- oN -~ . '---,-'::";'... '. 30 I--- l>>(,) .' reI- '. 7............. .. 1- 1Il-t I- ~I- --I. - I--- ~ l1<>=- , l'-~ ~r- c.:.:.. l'-, . ' . en-O' f- 1-'" 1 .... -.: I-- I--- ,.---- ,"7 ....::: :::ren I-.- . ..' -'- f.:- l. ; . l>>- .... 1 I-- (tlat I- f->- - 1-.-1.. z- - Cl)Cl) ~ ~WT I ~ '.. - ::l- I-- 1 c...Z .' o~ - - :::r ,-- , - ?J ::l r III - 0 ;.-.. .J ~ 2-... ~ I-.- '\ ,..- - - - - '-- - f-- - - - 17/ / ." - ~ // : \ - I--- ~ "~ f--- - . . . - f--- \ is iMAN\ F I-- - J J L- I I--- ~ -/ I~\ . DD~...~D~DDDDDDN """'~~ ~ ~~z -:tooo s: ;:9.~Gl-:-Glenzliis:s:;o;o;o;o;oo N\O() III ~~~_ooooo N~~~N~~~ ffi-:J~ 0 " ;:?; CD t ~ I I I I I I I I I )> I -. , -. 0 <DO o-oGlc:Gl(J)zC:S:S:(J)(J)(J)'~ ~=o III _ Cl)1IlCl):::r(l)3 -'-'-'S:- "t:I ~ :J:-.)o)>cn - ~ ::J ct::J.gc.Cr;:;:5.5..~~~ mcE = QC = (l) (J) ~ -0 ~ is'' :J ;:II ;:II 0 Cb iii"(t)"'C ~CD C!:c:r._--:::I-O --.. o a.. a. c -. ~ ~ ~~~g CD II) II) m m - OJ -. C'" c. "'2:2. CD CD CD c: CD (t) ::s I o~~~ I~ ii @ < _ -::lgm(l)(l)~~~-~ro "0 0 ::s::t., "~ ggJ2 ..... ;0 mcc :::r c: 0 ~ III III III ~ III (J) (TO 00::'= ~'~Q I -. .., - (l) c: 0 0 !!!. 3 3 3 3 -. ;a en ~ ~ ::I " (') o (l) O::l ~ -,_._,~~ CD _="0 - III < ~ N CD -0 __ COCD----' tlO~ I J~ (Jl 5' (II CD 0 (l) ~ 3. Co g :::: ='1 ""f ""f CD ""f :::s ::s ""l tI.l c '" ~ II) III !!. < - C 0~m<Jl::l::lCenmQ.;oQ) ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 a ..... (II ..... - 0- I ~ ::I (5' fA ~ CQCC a-6-~:I:S...... ~= ~~"" < ~ <0 :r C 5' ." iiJ a. ::l _, rille III 0 III -. .. <0 "0 ....::ti I '" ~ ..... II) ; O::l-octfji-O ~ (II ::I. o ~ [:;"::3 ~ ~ I a CD o l?::lCC(J) '" (II - - i - ! ::l \ , .; " I, ~~ ~ ~ " '" ~ ;0 , '1 ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I " n\......_:-rJ )U~ "",. " '., '.;.-;"; .:! --.&>rC - . ~.~ ~~ OFr '<;' ~ ;.0;;. .~.//....'" : . "'$:'" N.. .-S:. .'" .~ . ~.. .....:;~F At.... /;;/.' ~ i " . ~. ~..... I .... , - ....;~~:....:i.:~. --- ~:. \J 'I j" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " '. - - ---_ ""t..:- - __ ~"'.r. -. ... z ~ ~~ ~" ~ , H .loti. ~ 'J " - <\ - '. ----: , , *,....?l It I~..'/", H'.......?-:; .., ~ '. '- " ~ ~\ '. -.... ~..... . , < :-b ~ " ""-~~,~. ."r......:"I. ,';" " . I to ~ ~ I:' " . I 5\ ',,' I JO ~ \~I I I I I " ') ..I ~ ' , , . , , , " H -., -/,.".' ?"'J, ~ =-" ~ ,....C-:-: ~ ... ' e. , __:E!-Ef" OO,! ~ -;;::-. I I I I I I I I I --- I I .. I ~ '" .. .. I 0 I .. .. " I 0 i:: 0 ., .. I E .. ~ I .... b l:: T <,t7? j: J: en Z ,. ~ . ';.;, >- " I 0 I I .VOZ' ;-'1'-, '" I I h._._ __ ._':':~. I I I I I -.. ~ ~R ~-. I I ,::7",' d 11 nJ.-' ;~.:t;:..'J:"~~ .~:': --~"-'~..lS ".'v~"" . ",..,- !~: ,;+" ..TiS."'...:.?' I,W p~> ~ .;<{ ~ \ ' ... ','r- .". .,/"\ ~~ ~~ ~ '. ~~ ,<,. . ~~ ~'i , '\ " J CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 LOT SPLIT REQUEST FORM Property Address n c.b3 ~...J-\.. P -:-J"':' Legal Description of ~roperty: (Fill in whichever is appropriate): Lot Block Addi tion PIN tf6-~2-'Z..'"f-1z..- OO\y (If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal description). Is the property: Abstract)( or Torrens ? (This information must be providea-aDa can be obta1ned from the County) . ;::::~-;:;-;:~~::~-j~)-~-~~:---~--~-~~~-~~-~--- f'.V--\} ~ 1 Current Zoning k-i Sil1G,{e FQlYltI~. e(.1/ql , ----------------------------------------------------------------- N f A 1 . t ---T"\ - , ame 0 pp J.can \ n r) \f--;) .;; ~ shor.z.-ev\ ~~, VlSOV\ Address lIl.o?: ---r-..l i', P S'-r Home Phone '\ -; 3 Lf! 5"<5-: Business Phone Signature \~"'-<i:j. ~-t'~/,---- Date \ \ - '"\ -I l ----------------------------------------------------------------- Property Owner (Fee Owner) (If different from above) Address ... Home Phone Business Phone \ ) Signature Date ----------------------------------------------------------------- \ .J CITY of ANDOVER CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m" or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday, November 25, 1997 at Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota to review the lot split request of Thomas and Shareen Johnson to split approximately 5 acres from a 10.50 acre parcel located at 17203 Tulip Street NW (pIN 08-32-24-12-0014) legally described as follows: ' That part of the North 694 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 32N, Range 24W, Anoka County, Minnesota lying southerly of the north 330 feet thereof except the south 34 feet of the north 364 feet of the west 660 feet thereof, except road, subject to easements of record, All written and verbal comments will be received at that time, A copy of the application will be available for review prior to the meeting at City Hall. tbt~ t!~ Victoria V olk, City Clerk Publication dates: November 14, 1997 November 21, 1997 " ) P~;053224430004 MINNESOTA HOUS~G FIN AGENCY ~: :CHAEL T OBERLE ATIORNEY50 E 5TH STREET SlaTE 300 P~; 053224430005 COLBY ROBERT H 3434 173RD LN NW ANDOVERMN 55304 P~:053224430006 ELMQillST JAMES R & JUDITH R 3454 173RD LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304' P~: 053224430007 SWOBODA ROBERTA D 3510 173RDLNNW ANDOVERMN 55304 P~: 053224440052 PARIS EDWARD & COLLEEN 3348 173RD LN NW ANDOVER MN 55304 P~: 083224110002 PETERSON WILLIAM B & C L 17280 ROUND LK BD NW ANOKA MN 55304 P~:083224110003 ENGA LEE A & LORRAINE G 17214 ROUND LAKE BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 P~: 083224110005 OLSON DEAN J & PENELOPE J 17132 ROUND LAKE BLVD NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN; 083224120002 LARSEN JASON C 17151 TULIP ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 P~: 083224120003 SKAROLID WILLIAM F & JOSEPH W 17127 TULIP ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 083224120008 ANDERSON DOUGLAS B & RENAE L 17165 TULIP ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 P~: 083224120009 HENNESSEY MILDRED A 3254 NORTH 7TH AVE ANOKA MN 55303 PIN: 083224120010 LINDAHL JAMES R & KIMBERLY 17275 TULIP ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 P~: 083224120012 JOHNSON THOMAS J & SHAREEN 17203 TULIP ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN; 083224120013 JANZEN GREGORY T & KARIN J 3394173RDLNNW ANDOVER MN 55304 P~; 083224120014 JOHNSON THOMAS J & SHAREEN 17203 TULIP ST NW ANDOVER MN 55304 P~:083224210001 BASS ALICE 3615 172ND LNNW ANDOVER MN 55304 P~:083224210002 OSIECKI GERALD E & B C 3671172ND LNNW ANDOVER MN 55304 , , , I PIN; 083224210009 BRANCHAUD DAVID W & KRISTIN R 3614172NDLNNW ANDOVER MN 55304 P~; 083224210010 WESP RAYMOND J & MARY L 3634172NDLNNW ANDOVER MN 55304 P~:083224210013 KELLEY PAUL R & MARGUERITE 3' 'I72NDAVENW ... / ANDOVER MN 55304 P~: 083224210014 FIETEK STEVEN M & PAMELA A 3635 172ND AVE NW ANDOVER MN 55304 PIN: 083224210026 PORTER MICHAEL A & CATIIY L 3632 172ND AVE NW ANDOVER MN 55304 ' P~: 083224210027 PICOTIE MILES A & LAURIE K 3614172ND STNW ANDOVERMN 55304 P~:083224210028 KLENK RAYMOND L 00211 W 4TH ST WINTIIROP MN 55396 \ j CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \ ) DATE: February 3. 1998 AGENDA SECTION Discussion ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Approve Final Plat Chesterton Commons Second Addition 3. Community Development David L. Carlberg Community Development Director This item was tabled at the January 20, 1998, City Council meeting at the request of Jerry Windschitl, developer of the proposed project to be known as Chesterton Commons Second Addition. Mr, Windschitl raised an issue with item #6 on the resolution requiring the dedication of drainage and utility easements, The Council should note that during the discussion of the petitioning for improvements for the development on December 16, 1997, the Council made a condition of approving the petition contingent upon Mr, Windschitl dedicating the easements in question, This was a compromise to requiring Mr. Windschitl to plat the area to the south and west of this development and north of Hamilton Square. The December 16, 1997 City Council minutes are attached for Council review. If the Co.uncil chooses to approve the final plat, attached is a resolution for Council adoption. THE FINAL PLAT SHALL NOT BE RECORDED UNTIL ALL CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET. \ ) COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES, NO. R -98 \ / MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHESTERTON COMMONS SECOND ADDITION, AS BEING DEVELOPED BY ASHFORD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, IN SECTION 23-32-24, Anoka County, Minnesota, WHEREAS, the City Council conditionally approved the preliminary plat of the Development of Chesterton Commons ; and WHEREAS, the Developer has presented the final plat of Chesterton Commons Second Addition: and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed such plat for conformance with the preliminary plat; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the final plat of Chesterton Commons Second Addition contingent upon receipt of the following: 1, The City Attorney presenting a favorable opinion. 2. Security to cover legal, engineering, street sign and installation costs as determined by the City Engineer. 3. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site which is to be determined by the City Engineer or if the site is completed, a letter from the developer's engineer that lots and streets are graded according to the grading plan submitted and approved by the City. 4, The final plat not be signed by the Mayor and Clerk until there is an executed Development Contract, escrow paid (15% of the total costs for the improvements for the property {streets, utilities, etc.}), 5. Street light costs to be paid to Anoka Electric Cooperative, Costs to be determined by Anoka Electric Cooperative. 6. Receipt of all drainage and utility easements within and outside the plat if necessary as determined by the City, This includes the easements along Hanson Boulevard NW, 7, Developer is responsible to obtain all permits from U,S. Army Corps of Engineers, DNR, LGU, CCWD, MPCA and any other agency that may be interested in the site, 8, Park dedication as recommended by the Park and Recreation Commission, 9, Bikeway/walkway to be constructed along Hanson Boulevard NW, The developer shall pay 50% of the cost and the City shall pay 50% of the cost. 10. Contingent on staff review and approval for compliance with City ordinances, polices & guidelines. 11, Variance to Ord. No.8, Section 6,02, lot depth for the following: Lots 18 & 19, Block 2 . '\ Lot 1, Block 3, , J Lots 4,7,8,9, Block 5 \ ) '\ ; Page Two Resolution Final Plat - Chesterton Commons Second Addition February 3; 1998 12, Variance to Ordinance No, 10, Section 9.03G for length of cul-de-sac of Bluebird Street NW exceeds 500 feet (512,2 ft,). 13. Variances to Ord, No, 10, Section 9,03G for length of temporary cul-de-sac exceeding 210' (Crane Street is 230') 14, Construction of additional temporary cul-de-sacs as deemed necessary by the City if Cambridge Estates does not develop simultaneously, 15, Shall adhere to the geotechnical report accepted by the City. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 3rd day of Februarv. , 19-.mL, CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E, McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk o 0 ~i i +.-- .....- .-_.. -- --+ .-- - -. --- --- --- -".- -.--. -- I I ^ J\1~""r\"1 "<,,1 'I r'".\ r-)'-' "I lAI r Ir\1 ~ _,;VI" [...\JLJI I V '-'1"'\1 J I 'L ~ V. 9WI ~ ~ ,'\ ~- ^ I I .... 1'-' - , q \ ~ ~ iI \.. .J. ( ,..........,;.1-,.1 I. i..11 '1'.,1. I (.. I (II I I 0:: ... () ~ () -0 W..t IIn. Qr lh. N.W. 1/4 S.c;, 2~ Jwp. 32. ftg_. 24...... l~l::J-:,IM:, .=~:~ '01 ~)~ ~ \ ......... P" Oocl. No. aQ12~ \ ~ rH t:tj .: 111)1) 11 : ~ )" ..-,1 .. \ .... -.. ..'-"11-".'" lIt . " ----- --,,131189............. J~ " .. /" . 'N (fJ , - -- - - '7"-1 I.., !lrr N / ,,' - . , s g UI / , I I~l ,..-Jd,obI090 ond ~ i f~i .-. r--:J i .:;~~~ , ~ ~ [~ () ~ : - ~ -i ~ ! ()O -< , ~ u 111::0 0 ; l-- s:: )> ~ 'z - CDT) t-7 l'; 111-j ~~ ~ ~ Z I~ , -"0 0 .~ '. -, 0 , ~O < n 111 I I~I -.. lJ ~ ' ~g W-< 0 C W i ~ --J ~ I ~ o. ~ l/ o ~ C w" ...." 0 0 CJ C Ci ~Q ~~ 3 rJ ::z,yjs.~. 0 \ 0 .. ~ c".E~ p'1I no 1.\ -i ~ - ].....1 ~:. ~ Z n -. c It 0" )> fl-/..(J o.~ C - r I ".to o. :J ... 0 u ;t 5' a. t:~3 :rg 3 UJ. Q 0 s: 0 , ,_ ~ _ _.f.T :J 4:~:r ~~ 3 , , 8 _.ii' 3'" g '( ... -. r' . )> du1! o~ rr-. (') ~1~~~:T \J.J. II) NoT .a,' .' if ii'g () ~ 1 r'l'. d3 0 L......j ~:: g.o C N.... :3 ~ ,......., I "'S' ,,3 Z ,~ 11 0'" -i o ., -< '-1' -'CIl~ 0 I , ~:l 0 o 'TJ ~ () ~ ~ -.0 Z ~ COo.....-; ? ^ o ~ -, OJ > - t:j o c ~ ? 0.....-; ~ ~ () ~ ~ o "U I h I I) I .i'l f /- t-7 ~ 111\1 I I 1\ III I' ~ I w..t Iln. of lh. HE. 1/4 0' lh. ./ N.W, 1/4 S.c. U. h,p. J2. RlI" 24 / ,/ NOO'05'JO"W ,- -- --, -.- -445,51- ;'JUl ", OUTLOT D ~::-':', ~ ~ '(:!~,'~, l<}d"~ ' ' .1 ( I .: ""lJ . ." ..( '11 ' . (I I \ I .. .11 "I C) ("'r.] \ " \ ... -..' I u. '., --. >., ,~ " c.t> ", ., ~. '0 ( ::.1 ~-1.1 . <\ 6t(o() / J -., I o....d .I I >., I ~ &o~ I '-;] :J"....~ 5' 1 Ul ..) _. ~ 5' 5'''' I ('1 0 (. N -. 3' " UI LID :c ;0 I U1<o~ - - P1~ " r't ..... I Z - " .. -, Uo 0 It -i Z J,' ... I a~~'" I U))> S z 0': - I (;) ~()) o;.~::J 1 Iu. )>-fl1 c.n1D B - 0.: L_. . _ _l_ ;u.... (~, .- 0 ~ n 5' -. -. ,- r.=-=r= f'1 ~ (Jl , ao It tI 0. I Z CD . gUo~5 J I.Jl (1)0 ...... NiO c '0 "J: ( ) ,.------- I..! ~..::J5::J I ac.- -: 11'.'00 'l ~Ul1.. '" ;: ft . a. I ~ :::J 1 I,,,~ r" ~~/~ _,~""'''' ~ utJii.'o 1'0 ZC "t. 11!~._..,I~"~"1..1 1l.~I'.I<< I ::01 - .. n - -- -j - - 1<>1\ (Jl 'J'" "I VI ~ :ro' I :--f -< " r . .... 0.4i !)' ;"'1 _ . CI 5' I:.J;: I ..........., T- I ,,:' .. ::J _. C j. ". I m nJ I ~, I...... '-~..!jl_ ..J ( i 1 - , >-:1: . -' ~I ~/J ~ [~ / 236,51 0> r.1 il~ 0.. a 500"13'41"E L 8 / P':J 1\ roc, .10 _ ... en CA \ I ~ .. --00 . qq"V ~ :3 ::s '0" ()c. . ,to; ---..--.-------.......~.--.-,- _-_0._._- -..~...-..-------..- ___.__________.__.___.____._.______.____._.____ ...__________.. n._._.~,._~._..,__~._.__ ...". . _ ___.._____________ '_ -' Regular Andover Ciry Council/\,Jeering Jlinules - December 16, 1997 Page 10 (Discuss De~'elompem Polic.)' Guideline Phasing. Cominued) .'-lotion by Orttel that the 60-acre parcel ofFahrnam to the extent possible be included in the 1998 construction; that the property owned by the Pilot Development Company be included; the south 25 acres of Cambridge Estates be included; and on those three that the time for complying be extended to allow completion of the platting process; and Chesterton Commons 2nd Addition south of Cambridge Estates. There was no Second. Several Councilmembers struggled with the proposal of Chesterton Commons 2nd Addition because it excludes the development of the southwestern triangle in 1998, Councilmember Orttel did not think the City had the right to dictate to the developer which acres should be developed. The proposal is a logical extension of the sewer line and is a continuous development of the MUSA He did agree to delete that portion of the motion "south of Cambridge Estates" to avoid confusion, Attorney Hawki:1s advised the Council can tell a developer what can be developed as long as there is a reasonable basis for it. Jerry Winds.d1i1l - argued this proposal is no different than what is being done in Shadowbrook. There are no gaps; it is a continuous platting process. The Council wants to tell him he has to develop his worst lots. Gordon Jenson Attorney for the Hamiltons - stated they are tr;ing to find out whether or not that southwest corner will be included in the Chesterton Commons development. They have a significant concern regarding that issue because of the storm sewer system, and they are trying to determine what will and will not be developed in 1998. Because the issue regarding the southwest corner of the Chesterton Commons plat relates directly to Item 6, Ashford Development Petition for utilities/Chesterton Commons Phase II, the Council agreed to discuss that item at this time, then return to the Development Policy GuidelinelPhasing discussion, (i) DISCUSS ASHFORD DEVELOPMENT PETITION FOR UTILITIES/CHESTERTON Cm.,fMONS PHASE II \ , '- j Mr. Erickson reviewed the petition received from Ashford Development Corporation to order the preparation of a feasibility report for streets and utilities for the second phase of Chesterton Commons, IP97-49. It is a unique situation because two developers are involved with the phasing and timing relating to Chesterton Commons. Typically, the City hasn't directed the phasing of plats; but in this instance, the timing of Chesterton Commons directly relates to the development of Hamilton Square to the south. Hamilton Square was designed with an interconnection of storm water with Chesterton Commons, which is directly rated to the triangular piece being left out of that development. Another option for Hamilton Square would be to develop with on-site ponds. There are some grading issues if the storm water is all run down the ditch of Hanson Boulevard, plus the need for an agreement from the county. , , ) Regular AndOl'er City Council ;\"feeting !vlinlltes - December 16, 1997 Page 11 (Discuss Ashford Del'elopmmt Petition for Utilities- Chestertoll Commolls Phase II, COnfi1med) JetfSchopek Hamilton Engineer - reviewed the drainage proposal in detail to drain into a catch basin within Chesterton Commons and ultimately to Ditch 37, Hamilton Square has already been assessed for that connection to Chesterton Commons. When the Chesterton Commons phase for that southwestern triangle is being developed, the plan is for Hamilton Square to connect to the storm drainage system, It is a timing issue and they expected development in an orderly fashion. From a planning standpoint, he noted the proposal of Chesterton Commons 2nd is for a very long deadend street almost up to Hanson Boulevard with no connection to the southwestern triangular parcel. It would be better from a safety standpoint to do the entire project at one time, Mr Windschitl - stated the City is asking him to plat his worst lots. When the Hamilton Square project was approved, it was approved with two ponds. They can develop the entire parcel without his development. What is being asked of him is to his economic detriment for the gain of another. The Council discussion then returned to Item I. This item was discussed again later in the meeting. DISCUSS DE VEL OPJJENT POLICY GUIDELINE/PHASING, CONTINUED It was then suggested that the issue regarding the development of the southwest triangle in Chesterton Commons is not relevant to this discussion and should be considered further under Item 6, ,\.-Iotion by Orttel, Seconded by Dehn, that the 60-acre parcel cffahrnam to the extent possible be included in the 1998 construction; that the property owned by the Pilot Development Company be induded; the south 25 acres of Cambridge Estates be induded; and on those three that the time for complying be extended to allow completion of the platting process; and Chesterton Commons 2nd Addition. Motion carried on a 4- Yes, I-No (McKelvey) vote. @ ASHFORD DEVELOPMENT PETITION FOR UTILITIES/CHESTERTON CO,\fMONS PHASE II, CONTINUED , ./ Nfr. Erickson explained that with the approval of the development of Cambridge Estates, there will be an exit for Chesterton Commons onto Hanson Boulevard, which provides a second access assuming it all falls into place for 1998. Without the development of that southwest triangle in 1998, he felt that a temporary storm sewer system could be developed for Hamilton Square if the easements can be obtained through that undeveloped triangle. Staff would have to look at the additional costs. There could be an outlet pipe discharging to the ponding system. The ponds are constructed, but there is no connection between them in Chesterton Commons. The discussion continued with Jerry Windschitl, Ashford Development, arguing the Hamilton Square project was approved with ponding so his development does no: affect them. He didn't want to be " '- Regular AIIJowr City ('ol/lIcil ,"fef!ting Afillllll!S - Df!cemba f6, f997 Page 12 (Discuss Ashford Dewlopme/lt Petition for Utilities Chestertoll Commolls Phase If, Continued) forced to do something to his detriment to benefit another developer. Mr. Schopek, Hamilton's Engineer, explained the plat was approved with two storm drainage systems, the ponding and a proposal to outlet through the Chesterton Commons plat. Mr. Erickson stated from an engineering standpoint, the preferred option is to drain north. Easement will be needed from both Chesterton Commons and Cambridge Estates to the north to ultimately discharge to Ditch 57, Attorney Hawkins stated the City can require the developer to provide the easements from that southwest triangle as a part of the overall development scheme, It would be proper tc ask for the easement now to assist the development of adjacent property, Mr. Windschitl argued he will be flooded out if the storm water pipe is not built now, because there is a very large amount of water from the Hamilton Square area. He understands the Hamilton property is in the process of being sold to another developer, and now they want to develop it by dumping the \\iater on him. Gordon Jenson, Attorney for the Hamiltons, stated there is no option on the table; no purchase agreement submitted; no plans of development for the parcel to the south, The plat for Hamilton Squar~ was approved with two alternatives for storm water. They would like to have the opportunity to use the easement to the north. They have already deposited funds to drain to the north, Mr. Windschitl stated if there is no rush to develop the southern portion of Hamilton Square, then what difference does it make if that southwest comer is developed this year or a year from now. A/otion by Orttel, Seconded by Dehn. that the Council approve the petition from Ashford Development Corporation, to adopt the Resolution as presented with the condition that it is subject to the City obtaining the right of way for drainage easement on the adjacent parcel to the west of the proposed plat. (See Resolution R3l7-97) DISCUSSION: Councilmember Orttel noted the intent would be that Mr. WindschitI would provide the same utility easements that would be taken off the preliminary plat for that southwestern portion. Because they would be required as a part of the plat, he would not be paid for them. Mr. WindschitI argued the proposal goes through a large portion of a lot, not on a lot line. Mr. Erickson stated they would work with Mr. Windschitl and the county to place the pipe within county easements where necessary and to run it adjacent to the lots along the drainage and utility easement lines. l'vlotion carried unanimously. DISCUSS 1997 ANOKA COUNTY TRAFFIC STUDIESIWARRANTED TRAFFIC SIGNAL " The Council did not see a need for a traffic signal at Round Lake Boulevard and 14lst Lane, though they suggested that turn lanes on Round Lake Boulevard at 14lst Lane and 143rd Avenue would resolve the problem. The Council agreed with the traffic signal at Hanson Boulevard at Crosstown Boulevard and asked that the county study Hanson Boulevard at Andover Boulevard. They also agreed to request the county to study the intersections of Crosstown Drive and 139th AvenuelCrosstown Boulevard, CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \ j DATE: February 3. 1998 AGENDA SECTION Discussion Item ITEM NO. Timber River Estates! Park Dedication Discussion 4. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Todd Haas, ~ Engineering The City Council is requested to determine the Park Dedication requirements for Timber River Estates, The City Council at their March 18, 1997 meeting made a motion that the park dedication be negotiated by staff and Mr, Westlund, Consideration was to be given as to the appraised value of designated park area and then subtracted from the park dedication fees. The Park and Recreation Commission has reviewed the motion that was made by the City Council and has discussed this in detail. A motion was made "that the developer be given credit for the acres as shown for this park as being development as has always been done in the past on the overall value of the plat per the Ordinance and any excess acreage will be cash in lieu of land similar to what we have always done and not give special precedence in this case", Attached is the Park and Recreation Commission meeting minutes and the agenda items of December 4, 1997 and January 15, 1998 for your review, Woodland Development Company will be at the meeting to discuss the item with the City Council. Also, a representative of the Park and Recreation Commission will be at the meeting to address the City Council on this issue, Note: The appraiser hired by the City has indicated the value of the land along the river will be at least twice the value of the land not located along the river (it could even be more than that if a detail appraisal was done just for the land along the river), Woodland Development Company has indicated to City Staff they would agree to twice the value if the City Council proceeds on the original motion made at the March 18, 1997 meeting. \ '-- ----) , Regular Park and Recreation Commission Meeting ) Minutes - December -I, 1997 Page 2 ~ TIMBER RIVER ESTATEs/PARK DEDICATION DISCUSSION Mr. Haas explained the Council requested the Staff work with the developer to come to an understanding of the value on the six-acre Rum River property designated on the plat of Timber River Estates as park. An appraiser was hired by the City, The question in this case is whether or not the value ofthe land is equally valued throughout the property. In negotiations with the developer, it was concluded that the property along the Rum River is more valuable than the property on the interior of the plat. A letter from the City-hired appraiser confirms the property along the Rum River is at least twice the value of the interior property, However, it was the developer who chose the river property for a park; the City did not request it. The rest of the park dedication is to be cash in lieu ofland. The developer wants the City to give credit for the increased value of the park land on the river. The City Administrator has suggested the Commission may want to stay with the philosophy used the past eight or nine years of using the average raw land value to determine park dedication. Commissioner Grabowski did not want to vary from the policy, as it would set a precedent for other developers to ask for similar credit claiming high land or woodeclland, etc., has a greater value than some of the other areas of the plat, He also felt this is after the fact, and possibly the Park Board would not have chosen the river property ifit had been known up front that there was a concern with valuation and the amount of the cash dedication. There would be no objection to Mr. Westlund's request if the City had chosen the river lot. Chairperson O'Toole also agreed that the overall land value should be used. He felt the developer's proposal means the City, in effect, is ending up having to buy the lot back. Commissioner Anderson also felt it is a dangerous precedent to credit more for the river property. He too felt the Park Board may have taken interior property for the park. Byron Westlund, Woodland Development - stated the property had two different zoning districts on it. There ""ere two different values on the property; one for the Scenic River zone and one for the R-I zone. They paid more for the Scenic River zoning than for the R-l zone; but they recorded the average of both parcels, which is the valuation the assessor used. The park is a river lot, which gives the City almost instant equity. One river lot which is smaller in size sold for $100,000. His problem 'With the Commission's philosophy is he feels he is being punished because he gave the higher priced property as park. The City doesn't want wetland, so he offered a nice piece of ground. Now the City is not willing to increase the value, though it is considerably more valuable than the remainder of the property in the plat. " , / Mr. Westlund stated the issue did come up with the Staffat the beginning of the plat. They wanted to wait until the appraisal process was completed, but they agreed to keep the plat process going, He agrees with the appraiser that the river lot has a higher value. As proposed, the City is still getting cash and getting a prime piece of ground for less value, plus improvements. He felt the ordinance '\ " , , "'.., \" \ ) Regular Park and Recreation Commission Meeting !vfinutes - December -I, 1997 Page 3 (Timber River Estates, Park Dedication Discussion, Continued) needs to be reviewed for cases such as this where a portion of the land is twice the value of the remaining portion. He didn't think it is setting a precedent where there is something that is this obvious. They are asking that the City look at the value of the park, which is higher than the $6,800 per acre, and decrease the cash dedication they have given to the City for that difference. Mr, Haas also noted that it was the Council that asked the Staff to look at the park dedication when the PUD came to them because the park was prime land. Commissioner Lindahl wondered if the acreage along the river is included in the overall average of the appraisal. The parcel is a great gesture on Woodland's part, but he is looking for more clarification on how the appraisal was done and whether the lots along the river were included in the overaIl value the same as the park parcel which was dedicated. (Commissioner Barringer arrived at this time; 8: 18 p.m.) Mr. Westlund understood the proposed park area is prime land. He could have gotten two more river lots from it. He could have offered park land under the power lines, but he personally doesn't think the City would want it. He enjoys this the most because the residents are getting money or land. As the process moved along, they didn't get an appraisal for quite some time. It was after he was before the Commission about the curbing in the park, and at that time he noted he'd be back to discuss the appraisal. He agrees with the practice of averaging the cost of parcels for appraisals, but this is a very unique situation and he didn't think the appraisal reflects that. After further discussion, the Commission asked Staff to talk with the appraiser as to how she broke out the remaining river lots. They did not want to set precedent, but they were open to the possibility that the issue can be negotiated once further information is gathered. Mr, Haas stated he wiIl do the research on the appraisal and bring the item back for the first meeting in January, 1998. 1998 PARK CAPITAL IMPROVEUENT BUDGET DISCUSSION Mr. Haas stated Staff has not yet had an opportunity to talk to the City Attorney about using the trail fees that the City has been collecting with each building permit. He noted the funds that will be available for park improvements for next year. The funding for the fencing along the HiIls of Bunker Lake 5th Addition park has not been taking from the donation from the Andover Lions Club. The Commission generally felt it should come from that source. '. , ..) ANDOVER PARK COMMISSION REQUEST FOR PARK RECOMMENDATION DATE: December 4. 1997 ITEM #4 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Richard Fursman . . Administration, -' 4. Timber River Estates/Park Dedication Discussion The Park and Recreation Commission is requested to consider a resolution to the issue of Park Dedication fees for the Timber River Estates development. The Council requested staff work with the developers in coming to an understanding of value on the six (6) plus acre Rum River property so designated on the plat as park. Staff has met with the developers and the City hired appraiser to seek an answer, The City has historically practiced taking ten percent of the value of a development in either land or cash for contributions to the park system, The question in this case is whether or not the value of the land in this development is equally valued throughout the property, After considerable discussion, the group in n~gotiation concluded the property along the Rum River is, indeed, of more value than property on the interior of the plat. For purposes of Park Dedication fees equaling ten percent of value, it would stand to reason that river lot property would have a predevelopment value higher than the non-river lot property, The practice of exacting ten percent of property for park development does not necessarily entitle the City to take ten percent of the "most valuable" land any more than It would require the City to take the worst ten percent. A letter from the City hired appraiser confirms that the property along the Rum River is of at least twice the value of the property on the interior of the development. When considering remaining Park Dedication fees, the designated property on the plat should be valued not in terms of total acreage, but in terms of value, This value is deemed to be $93,400; the rest of the $124,400 Park Dedication will come in the form of cash, \ /~ . , , Integral Appraisal 1 '- J Residential and Income Property Valuations " RECEIVED NOV 1 0 1997 CITY, .,NDOVER Mr, Richard Fursman City Administrator City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW' Andover, MN 55304 November 6, 1997 . . RE: Timber River Estates Andover, MN 55304 File No,: 1-2104 Dear Mr, Fursman: " As you are aware, I performed an appraisal of the above captioned property for the . purpose of determining it's overall market value to ultimately determine the value ofthe park dedication, The fair market estimate was based on raw land value of the entire parcel and the standard "computations were utilized to determine the value of the park dedicatiGn, ~ \ At our November 5, 1997 meeting regarding Timber River Estates, a general consensus was established, It was agreed, not surprisingly, that the selected portion for park dedication, with it's river frontage along the Rum River, had superior value to the typical interior parcel. With that in mind, it is apparent that the overall estimate of value for the entire parcel is not an accurate estimate.offair market value for the actual portion ofIand being granted. It is this appraiser's opinion that the land with river frontage along the " Rum River has a value at least twice that of the interior parcels, If I can be of service to you, please do not hesitate to contact me at; 961-9337, R"P'ctfulJ>-S, ubmitt,d. ~' /2<- ~ . I I e:~, .~. q;( MN License #4001270 -., \.~ ~~ ... 450 Vadnais Road, Vadnais Heights, Minnesota 55127 (612) 486-8298 \ .~.r~ ...-.. .-.-"'S- . ',,', ,. "'.~ "_:.--'~ ~.......,'~" :,,,,-.~ ~'>_~_,- ,~..".............-~....,- -...-.......,.,.........--:;. ...~,.....'r- ..,~,-.....~............,~.':;.;.~. " 4 ......., ._~..., ~ _.!.. '\ , -' Reg/.-!ar AlidOl'er Park and Recreation Commission Meeting !\.finutes - .lalluan- 15, 1998 Page 2 (Approve Revised 1998-1998 Hockey Schedule, Continued) (Commissioner Kieffer arrived at this time; 7:40 p.m.) Acting Chairperson Grabowski noted that the ice in Andover's rinks is better than those of the surr::>unding cities. He also suggested the Anoka Hockey Association should be asked to make a donation to help the City with the upkeep of nets, etc. Mr. Haas noted the additional application to scnedule lhe Crooked Lake School rink on Thursdays from 6:30 to 8 pm. ,HOlion by Lindahl, Seconded by Kieffer, that we approve this revised schedule with one comment, that we should look at this for next year for time frames and try to get some structure or make some limits, ~fotion carried on a 6-Yes, I-Absent (O'Toole) vote. ~ TI.HBER RIVER ESTATES/PARK DEDICATION DISCUSSION/CONTINUED Mr. Haas reported Janet Staeheli of Integral Appraisal has responded to the Park and Recreation Conmlission's request to clari!'; the appraisal regarding the cost of the property along the river versus that property that is not on the river. She states in her January 2, 1998, letter that in her professional opinion, the land with frontage along the Rum River has a value of at least twice that of the interior parcels. The Council has asked Staff and the developer to negotiate the park dedication, Staff understands that to mean the Council wants to give some credit for the park dedication because the park iand along the river has a higher value. In discl!ssing the issues, the Commissioners remained unchanged in their opinion. They felt that any deviation from the ordinance in determining land value would set a precedent for future plats. They were also concerned that the issue was raised after the park land was accepted and over the fact that the developer offered the river property to the City for the park, the Commission did not request it. It was also felt that the parcel was a less desirable piece of property from a development standpoint and that additional value should not be given after the fact. If the Commission had known about this issue at the time the park property was first discussed, they may have chosen to take park land from elsewhere in the plat, not along the river. It was argued the river property is not necessarily a benefit to the City, but more of a benetit to the developer to provide river access to the residents of the devdopment. ? Motion by Anderson, Seconded by Barringer, that the developer be given credit for the acres as shO\IIn for this park as being developed as has always been done in the past on the overall value of the plat per the ordinance, and any excess acreage will be cash in lieu ofland similar to what we have aiways done and not give special precedence in this case. Motion carried on a 6-Yes, I-Absent (O'Toole) vote. " j , " ANDOVER PARK COMMISSION REQUEST FOR PARK RECOMMENDATION " --~' DATE: lanuary 15. 1998 ITEM #6 6. Timber River Estates/ Park Dedication Discussion/Cont. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Todd J. Haas,~ Parks The Park and Recreation Commission is requested to continue discussing the issue in the park dedication for Timber River Estates. If you recall, this item was tabled from the December 2, 1997 by the Park and Recreation Commission to allow the appraiser, Janet Staeheli of Integral Appraisal, to determine a definitive value for the river lots. Attached is Ms. Staeheli response letter dated January 2, 1998 for review. Also, attached are the meeting minutes of March 18, 1997 and April 1, 1997 of the City Council for you review. '- '" 01/85/1993 13:16 5124868298 INTEGRAL PAGE 02 Integral Appraisal Residential and Income Property Valuations '\ ~r, Todd Haas Parks Director City Of Andover 1.685 Crosstown Boulevard Andover, MN 55304 January 2, 1996 RE: Timber River Estates Andover, MN 55304 File No.: 1-2104 Dear Mr. Haas: Thank you for sending a copy of the minutes for the December Park and Recreation Commission Meeting, As noted in the minutes, the CommisSion WOUld like to know how I 'broke out the remaining river lots' in my letter dared November 6, 1997, As you know, a definitive value was not given in this letter. What was given was my professional opinion that the land with frontage along the Rum River has a value at least twice that of the Interior parcels. This opinion is supportea by market data comprised of land with water frontage througnout the entire metropolitan area and is not meant to be an estimate of market value. A value of twice that of the Interior parcels represents the least amount ttlat this land would sell for in the open market and It Is probable that It has a value that exceeds thIs amount. However, a complete analysis would be necessary to determine a viable estimate of market value, If I can be ot service to you, please do not hesitate to contact me at; 961.9337. 3anet R. Staeheli MN License #4001270 ,__ho Vadnais Road, Vadnais Heights, Minnesota 55127 (612) 486-8298 Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - March 18, 1997 /" Page 7 \ j SPECIAL USE PERMIT/PUD/TIMBER RIVER ESTATES Mr. Carlberg reviewed the request for a Special Use Permit of Woodland Development Corporation to develop a Planned Unit Development of 81 single family homes ranging in size from 1 acre to 8.85 acres. The property is being developed under the density zoning provisions of Ordinance No.8, Section 3.02. The trade off for the density increase are the improvement of the park with a ball field, playground equipment, shelters, fishing pier and trails throughout the development. They are also seeking a variance to the 150 x ls0-foot building pad, but they are meeting the requirements for a primary and secondary septic system. The Planning Commission had no interest in connecting the plat to the south, though access is a concern of the Fire Department. Bvron Westlund. Woodland Development - stated a footprint of each lot indicates the buildable. area. They have also purchased property to the north to avoid the DNR protected wetland. with the road. No streets from this development will go south. Eventually there will be a third exit from the plat to the north. Councilmember Dehn understood the concern with accesses to platted areas; however, in this instance she did not support the access to the south. That access would potentially disrupt the ambiance of the existing neighborhood. Councilmerr,ber Knight agreed. In discussing the proposed park on the river, Councilmember Orttel had a concern that there may be a problem with it becoming a party area because.of its isolated location. A resident noted Ramsey closed its park directly across from. this. _one. plus.,tbe'county park to .the. north is rarely open. Another indicated that part of the park has been a radish field which floods. Potentially the whole park could be under water at some point. Mr. Westlund acknowledged the rear area of the park is in the flood plain. The Council noted the county is in the process of developing the park to the north. After some discussion it was also noted that there will be houses around the park, so hopefully it woulu not become a problem area. Mr. Westlund - then reviewed the storm water drainage proposed for the area, assuring everyone that this plat will reduce the rate at which water will leave the site. A resident asked if there will be restrictions regardi~g heat pumps which will add water to the system. Councilmember Orttel understood they are now looped a~d do not add water to the surface. Fire Chief Dan Winkel stat.ed his position is in 8cmpl~ance with the Uniform Fire Code, which states that a seco~d access shc~ld be provided to subdivisions in the event that a single road could be block~u f(.r ~~y reason. As proposed, it is about a 4,OOO-foot deadend read. If th~re is a pro~lem along the front. they would noe he able co get any trucks to the bac~ of the d~velopment. ~ " ztr. Carlberg seated an.::;ther issue is whether /~mprovements around them must 1::", considered as wheeher they ar~ related to the density i~~rease, che <J'J.':lots and the p;.rk dedi.cation or Regular Andover Ci ty Council Meeting Minutes - March 18, 1997 ./ Page 8 \, ) (Special Use Permit/POD/Timber River Estates, Continued) Mr. Westlund - stated they are proposing to dedicate the landfor the park plus the out lots to the City. Outlot A is a retention pond, and they will be landscaping and providing trails around it. Outlot B will be an unimproved common area drainage system with a trail, observation blinds and nesting boxes. They are making about $100,000 worth of improvements to the parks. Chairperson Dave O'Teole, Park and Recreation Commission - explained the Commission was not familiar with the PUD ordinance, but they did not want to accept outlot areas for park dedication. Typically in an R-1 area they have accepted ca3r. in lieu of land. The improved park is a benefit to the City and they feel the proposal is a good plan, but they do not want to accept outlots for parks and for maintenance purposes. Typically the trails being constructed have been for the benefit of the entire City. They feel the trails within this development will primarily benefit the residents living the::e. Mr. Westlund - stated the Comprehensive Plan dees call for a park in this area, plus it was mentioned when neighboring properties were developed that park land would be taken on this property. He also argued th:lt the Compreh':=l1sive Trail s Plan shows tr::iils up CoRd 7, which could connect int.:; the.:-.:: tralls .:u:d be u:;:.;:od ::'y everyone. Wi.th the outlots and park, the tot;:.}. park dedication would be almost 20 percent. The de~elopment is not set up as an association. Councilme~~er Orttel stuted he would rather S7.e the.outlots ewned by the residents in the area. For all appearances, this is a very private area, so t.he trails would probably only be used by the people within the developmen':. Councilr.lemcer D",lm agreed, suggesting the outlots be a part of an association so ther.::: is prid,; ef ownership within the neighborhood itself. Councilmember Knight also agreed, not wanting to set a :;:>recedent for (Ither PUDs of accepting outlots for park. Council:nember Orttel sta.ted tl1e value of the property being dedicated as park along the river is higher than the rest cf the parcel. Hi? suggested the appraisal take that into con~ideration when determining the dollar amount of cR3h to be taken in lieu of land for the remaining 11+ acres f.::!r park deJ.icati::;n. ':'he value of the river lot could be factored by maybe eigh~ percent because it is along the river. Mr. Westlund stated that w0uld b~ ~greeable. MOTION by Dehn, Seconde'i ty 'Jrtt~::', t~e Resolu':icn granting the Special Use Permit requ-=st of t.'ccclar.d Development CQrpct'z.tic.n fo;: a Planned Unit D~velopment to develop single family ru~al ~e5idential lot3/ho~es to be k;1':'h'rl as the sub<iivi.~.:.cn Tirr.ber River Estal:es with caveats to :.!~.:luJ.E: cc~c.:i.r:i:~r:s tr~3.t: C,~t:lt'")!:s .:~ and 9 will b~ :aLdl~rd cr prc5-~rty ,~ssc',::ia:.i()r.. o~N!":ed a:ld cOri.t.rcllcd; t:lat the "Cal:"~~ dedi..:~~icn ~'iill b-== ~egQt~a~~d b\' Staff d~d Mr. Westlu~d ~n reg3rd co =h~ prCU2r ap~rais3l ":/=:.lue -:"1: ene Odr'K d-::-::.:..ca:':,,:a1 fee a:1(1 :.he !:"=r.1alr:del- p?id .i.r~ ;::~~ term C:'lt "~m.o:1etary e lcati0D.. S:..xt '" c. '( ndS c;:,e:l estaol~shed at 81 lets... ~otio~ ca~ried t.:.nanlrnously. "" Regular _.:t.!1dover Ci ty COllncil Meeting Minutes - March 18, 1997 Page 9 '-. /~ PRELIMINARY PLAT/TIMBER RIVER ESTATES Councilmember Knight was concerned with the storm drainage. In talking with Mr. Westlund, he was assured that it would not be a problem. Several residents expressed concern with additional water draining to the south and affecting their subdivision, as they have had problems in the past. They want assurances that there will not be a problem and wanted to know who is liable if there is a problem. ' Bvron Westlund. Woodland Development - again went through the storm water drainage plan, indicating which direction the drainage will flow, the ponding, and the rates of flow during the lOO-year event. They tried to change the drainage patterns so less acres will contribute to the ponding that goes south plus reduce the volume and rate of run off to the south. The plan has been agreed to by their engineering firm, the watershed engineers, the DNR and the City's engineer. The calculations are also based on the worst-case scenario. Ernie pfannschmidt - waa involved in the water problem eight or ten years ago. They were proposed to be assessed for resolving the water problem but were not because it was found that this property did not contri~lte to the prcblem. The water came frcm the eaGe and south ef this property. l'~ reside:lt stated with 81' homes on this property, it could beco;ne a problem. r.!ayor McKelvey felt that with all of the engineers reviewing the proposed drainage plan, there must be some degree' (If confidence that the 10.'// is met whic~ states that no more water can flow eff the sio:e than'before .the development. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Dehn, the Resolution approving t:he preliminary pla~ of the Planned Unit Development of Timber River Estates as being developed by Woodland Development Corporation as prepared with the additional condition 'chat: it meet all the requirements of the Staff memo dated March 18, 1397, which includes TKDA's nlcommendationsi and note that a geotech."'lical e~gineer' s report is tv be approved by an independent engineer. and reviewed by the City Engineer, and if there are ~ no questions, it may be approved by the engineer or come back to the d City Council. Park dedication will be as discussed hy rnp City Council &~ this evening. (See Resolution R066-97) Motion carried unanimously. <,") Council recessed at 9: 45 i reconvened at 9: 55 p. m. ),i.} 1" DISCUSS/ORDINANCE 110. 92/ADULT USES Mr. Carlberg explained Staff has recently recei'.red a reque5t about opening an adul,: n0v.21 ty Lt.:3iness in A..J.C:ov,~::-. The ordinance ~wuld allow Cills as retail crad~ and se:vic~ ~n the ~B. SC a~d GE ~istric~s; and ':hey a:Ci;: !lot .-:equi:::-ei to be licenso:::d. The Ci':i A~;:::;!'ney has also i:;,dicac-:d. :.na~ a 3:.:?rr?r.:e C.~'.;r:: decisi'Jn !"-:::quir.::::s :h5.l". ;.:i~i~s h.)'-l~J 3.~ 'le~st fiv~ pe~:c2nt of r.r~e cCITlniur1it.y zor..2d cc -~:'lc.'.... a::.u:.t '.lses. " 'Andover's total cOIT'.t:1erci.:il a!'-=i:', is about tl>'O :9-=rcent vi tb::: Cicy. Staff has prepared a draft ordinance si~ilar to the City of ~ridley wn1cn provides ~ore detail~d defiGi~iGns and licensing of ~hese businesses, .'--- Regular Andover Ci ty Council Meeting Minutes - April 1, 1997 Page 5 \ " , (Feasibility Report/Order Plans & Specs/IP97-9/Chesterton Commons & Hamilton Property/Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Watermain, Continued) John Cos rove Jr. The Westlake Grou Inc. reoresentin the Hamiltons - stated they have been working with the post office and Health Partners to provide the parcels to meet their needs. One of the things they have done to make this work is to conceptually isolate the wetlands and ponding on Lot 3 to allow for the remainder of the development. They don't know how large a ponding area they will be required to have nor where the utility lines will have to be run. If this is approved tonight, he wanted some flexibility in the lot lines and the utility lines. As proposed, the sketch this evening ultimately may not be the best configuration. Mr. Erickson stated this is a conceptual alignment, and Staff will work with the Hamiltons to work this out and still accommodate the needs of the development. MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Dehn, the Resolution as prepared, with the' amendment that it be subject to minor revisions in the alignment of the utility lines to accommodate the site subject to getting proper and legal easements for the construction of the utilities. (See Resolution R078-97) DISCUSSION: Jerrv Windschitl. Ashford Develooment - was concerned that as proposed the northern and eastern part of the City are being cut off from municipal utilities. They are willing to meet at any time to resolve the problems. Councilmember Orttel stated the two parties should work an agreement to accommodate the construction. Councilmember Kunza stated if the Hamilton property is not developed, the extension of utilities to Chesterton Commons would be leap frogging. Mr. Windschitl - stated the determination was made when the utilities were extended to Woodland Estates that crossing commercial property or that of another use does not constitute leap frogging because the use is different. Other Councilmembers tended to agree. Motion carried on ~ 4-Yes, I-Absent (Knight) vote. ~ TIMBER RIVER ESTATES PARK DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS DISCUSSION Mr. Erickson explained at the March 18 meeting, the Council indicated the value of the proposed 6. 87-acre park should be credited to the developer because it is a river lot that has a higher value. Staff has discussed this with the City Attorney. It was determined that the park property was proposed by the developer. The park dedication should be based on the appraisal of the entire development per the ordinance.. The Council debated whether the proposed park should be given additional credit because of its value on the river and because this is a unique situation or whether the valuation to determine cash park dedication in lieu of land should be based on past practice and the ordinance . 'quirements. ... / Bvron Westlund. Woodland Develooment stated the POD does allow flexibility to the ordinance. When the land to the north was developed, ,"" '. ._-=--~.!....- ' Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - April 1., 1.997 Page 6 " . (Timber River Estates Park Dedication Requirements Discussion, Cont.) the Park Commission took cash in lieu of land but stated they would take land for a regional park when this property develops. That is why the park was proposed, and it made the most sense to put it by the river. He is asking for an adjustment in. the park dedication because the City is taking land at the higher portion of the average. Park Commissioner Al Grabowski stated the land on the river was proposed by the developer. The position of the Park and Recreation Commission is that all of the improvements were done as a part of the PUD. Also, a substantial portion of the river lot is flood plain. In responding to a question from the Council on developing a park that close to a county regional park which is closed, neglected and vandalized, Commissioner Grabowski stated that park is secluded, whereas this one will have homes around it. Mayor McKelvey stated if the park were located elsewhere in the development, it would take at least three lots which would retail about as much as the value of the proposed park on the river. Mr. Westlund stated that could have happened if they had received that direction earlier in the development process. Mr. Fursman stated any improvements. in the park are being done as a part of the PUD which gave the developer the ability to develop more lots on the parcel. Mr. Westlund suggested the appraisal process be started to determine what the valuation will be. Possibly it will be determined that th~re is little difference. If there is a wide variation, he will come back to the Council. The Council agreed to start the appraisal process to determine valuation for park dedication of cash in lieu of land. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CHESTERTON COMMONS Mr. Hinzman reviewed the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to change the OS, Open Space/Planned Unit Development designation to RU, Residential Urban Single Family on 160 acres and to change the designation of 40 acres from RM, Residential Medium Density to RU in the proposed Chesterton Commons. In exchange for the elimination of the RM designation on the Chesterton site, the developer would agree to change the land use district designation of a 60-acre parcel on the west side of Hanson Boulevard from RR, Single Family Rural, to RM. Councilmember Orttel stated it is confusing that public hearing notices are being sent for both the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and then' the actual rezoning itself. He suggested the process be changed to consolidate the two to avoid the confusion and the need to notify twice, as there may be quite a few changes to the Comprehensive Plan in the future. Mr. Carlberg stated the public hearing for the rezoning could be held and approval of the rezoning made contingent upon Metropolitan Council approval. , , . , nuTION by Orttel, Seconded by Dehn, the Resolution R079-97 amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Andover relating to the Chesterton Commons rezoning to urban residential. (See Resolution R079-97) Motion carried on a 4-Yes, I-Absent (Knight) vote. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \ ,-j DATE: February 3. 1998 AGENDA SECTION Discussion Item ITEM NO. Update ot Drainage Issue! 2776 - 164th Avenue NW!Jeff Leadens 5. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Todd Haas, /' Engineering This is an update item in regards to the Jeff Leadens drainage issue and the retaining wall that was constructed in the City right-ot-way along 164th Avenue NW in front of Leadens' property. If you recall, this item came up as an issue with the Zoning Administrator due to a complaint that was made by a neighbor because the retaining wall was constructed in the boulevard (which is considered a violation ot the boulevard encroachment ordinance) and the drainage that has been blocked due to the retaining wall and the filling of the ditch which has caused water runoff to pond on Leadens' neighbor. We have identified two possible options for Mr, Leadens to consider to resolve this drainage issue. They are as follows: 1, Remove the retaining wall, regrade the ditch on both sides of Leadens existing driveway and install a new culvert under Leadens driveway (if a culvert does not exist). By doing this it would meet the intent ot the original grading plan that was approved by the City of Andover, 2. Have Mr. Leadens meet and discuss with his neighbor the possibility of regrading the ditch between their lots so the ditch drains easterly to the existing wetland located at the back of their lots. The existing driveway culvert for Lot 5 would need to be reconstructed so that it drains to the east (currently it drains to the west). , ) ~ ~ \ ) Ri < ii> g ~ o ~ &~ 0>: 0, ~,I:j 0 1 . "- ~ 00 ~~ <) ~ b ~ <'\Jj : ~~C; ~ ":0 ~ :-~~!~ I ~ W 3 ~~ ':-.0 ~ 1 ~~ tg ~ 10+- ~ I / - ------#---<1<>" ~\.. ..1 'ocj>q,I:fJ'oq,q,~ _______________________ ~~ Cl . \ <!) R>-j-_'o<O~q,_,::c, ,~,U c.,1.. '" O-i 'fo'o -----------------~ I I ~~y, -f.-'Ot~. \..q 1~ I I I I I I .,",'0 i- t~~q, 1.'0'" '0 I I I I I I I I <0'0 1-'O~q, <:;..;..<0 1.~' ,..- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I tI=j \f) c-i- ~ c-i- (\J \f) L' ~ ~ ~ \f) I ~ I o o ~ .-e~ ~;<: ~~, k... '1'/' ~ <?~ ~"5\ ~ ~ ~ tI=j c:. (\J ~ c..o. ~ (\J (\J ~ , I I I I J J ~ o c:-I- CJ\ N ~ ~ "I J' " i .tl!ll, ,- ;(J l' ;"'l 0 () CJ\; /1/ -- --- -- - - t: ..~ 1 j. ~<li / / / '/ / / / / // . exC) /// ~ ,// so. / ~/1 ~ ((, (\) ~ (\) c.c: ~ ~ ~ 1'" 1-" I", ' ,~" i ,~ 1 g. ~ 'o~.J_ .;~iff~ '-- )..t~:l>)>::r: ~"=l'lVJ::Ja orol'''' 0..'" '; ~ to co CI .~-~ r~ z:; ~ 1~;b;r-5"g 0 il!:~~~~ :::l . ~ i CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 3.1998 AGENDA SECTION Discussion ITEM NO. Sketch Plan - Andover PUD Section 22 Chesterton Partnership ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT (0. Community Development David L. Carlberg Community Development Director Request The City Council is requested to review the proposed sketch plan of the Andover Planned Unit Development located in Section 22 as presented by Chesterton Partnership, General Comments * The proposed sketch plan is located in an M-2, Multiple Family Zoning District. The property was recently rezoned from R-1, Single Family Rural to M-2. The zoning is consistent with the Andover Comprehensive Land Use Plan. * The property is proposed to be developed as a mixed use Planned Unit Development. The development will consist of 351 residential dwelling units providing for a mix of single family homes, townhomes and apartments. Commercial uses are also a component of the PUD. A convenience store and day care facility are also planned. A Special Use Permit will be required to develop a PUD on the site in accordance with Ordinance No.8, the Zoning Ordinance and Ordinance No. 112, An Ordinance Regulating Planned Unit Developments. A Special Use Permit is also required for the bulk storage of liquid fuels associated with the convenience store. * The property is currently located in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The property is split between two (2) development phases. The eastern portion is to be developed in the 1995-2000 time frame. The western portion is to be developed in the 2000-2005 time frame. The eastern portion of the property was scheduled to develop in 1998 in accordance with the Andover Development Policy Guideline. The City Council has agreed to allow the entire development to be developed in 1998 provided utilities are available. Sanitary sewer and water services to the property will need further evaluation, , / \, , ./ Page Two Sketch Plan - Andover PUD Section 22 Chesterton Partnership City Council Meeting February 3, 1998 * All lots shall be required to meet the provisions of Ordinance No, 10, Section 9,06a(l) which relates to lot size and buildability requirements. In addition, the front 100 feet of each lot must be buildable which is a standard the City uses for lots developed with municipal sewer and water. * The Water Resource Management Plan shall be implemented with the development. * The 100 year pond elevation shall be identified on the preliminary plat. In addition drainage and utility easements are required for the 100 year flood elevations. Flood fringe and floodway boundaries shall be indicated on preliminary plat. * The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary permits (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U,S, Army Corp of Engineers , Coon Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, LGU and any other agency that may have an interest in the site). Initial contact shall be made with the City Engineering Department regarding this item, * There are wetlands within the proposed development that must be delineated by agencies and indicated on the preliminary plat. The Local Government Unit is the Coon Creek Watershed District. The developer shall contact the CCWD to discuss the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act that is in effect. * The developer is required to meet the following City Ordinances and all other applicable ordinances: Ordinance No.8, the Zoning Ordinance Ordinance No, 10, the Platting and Subdividing Ordinance Ordinance No, 107, Flood Plain Ordinance Ordinance No. 112, Planned Unit Development Ordinance Ordinance No. 114, Wetland Buffer Ordinance Ordinance No. 214, Diseased Shade Tree Ord. & Tree Preservation Policy \ / " '. ) Page Three Sketch Plan - Andover PUD Section 22 Chesterton Partnership City Council Meeting February 3, 1998 Andover Review Committee Comments The Andover Review Committee (ARC) met on Tuesday, January 6, 1998 to discuss the sketch plan, Comments from the meeting are as follows: * Sanitary sewer and watermain extensions need to be considered and discussed. * Coordination ofthe entrance street to Hanson Boulevard NW is necessary with plat of Burr Oak Run to the south and Cambridge Estates to the east. * Review and discuss memo dated January 9, 1998 from Scott Erickson, City Engineer and Todd Haas, Assistant City Engineer. * The Anoka County Highway Department has reviewed the sketch. See attached letter dated December 29, 1997 from Jane Pemble, Traffic Engineer, Anoka County Highway Department. * The issue of private streets vs. public streets needs to be examined and discussed. Street access to Burr Oak Run on the western portion of the plan may need to be provided. * Trails and walkways need to be discussed. Trail along Hanson Boulevard NW is planned as a part of the Andover Comprehensive Trail Plan. Trails connecting development to Hanson Boulevard NW trail and to Burr Oak Run for access to the Oak View Middle School and should also be discussed. * Wetland buffer protection will be required per Ordinance No. 114, * TKDA comments pending. . / Page Four Sketch Plan - Andover PUD Section 22 Chesterton Partnership City Council Meeting February 3, 1998 * Northern Natural Gas Company review needed due to the proximity of the Northern Natural Gas Pipeline. United Power Association will also need to review plan. * The lot arrangement or layout needs to be shown. Setbacks for the structures will need to meet City standards. * The commercial components of the plan will need to be processed as separate commercial site plan applications. This will include lot sizes, setbacks, parking requirements, etc. * The Planning and Zoning Commission may wish to require the developer to sketch the area to the north of this development. It should be noted that some of the above listed items will need to be addressed as a part of the sketch plan review and some of the items will need to be addressed as a part of the preliminary plat application and review. The ARC is listing these items at this time for discussion purposes, The City Council should remember that this item has not been studied by staff in detail as most of the detail will be reviewed as a part of the preliminary plat. Planninl! and Zoning Commission Review The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and tabled the sketch plan at their January 13, 1998 meeting. The Commission requested additional information related to the MSA designation in the area, public vs. private streets, and road connections to the north and south, Other issues or items of discussion are detailed in the attached minutes from the meeting. The Commission on January 27, 1998 discussed those issues listed above. The Commission dismissed the MSA designation as the Council had ruled on that issue on , ) January 20, 1998. The Commission does recommend that the streets in the development , ) Page Five Sketch Plan - Andover PUD Section 22 Chesterton Partnership City Council Meeting February 3, 1998 be public streets and that a connection be made to Burr Oak Run to the south in the western portion of the development, The Commission requested the eastern street connection to Burr Oak Run be moved west of the daycare to align with the T intersection creating a four way intersection. The Commission suggested the parking lots of the convenience store and daycare be connected or a frontage road be constructed. The Commission also recommended the Park & Recreation Commission review the walkwaylbikeway trail system. Park and Recreation Commission Review The Commission was scheduled to review the sketch plan at their January 15, 1998 meeting. The developer has recently requested the Commission review the plan at their February 5, 1998 meeting. The Commission will be discussing and making a recommendation on the park dedication requirements per Ordinance No. 10, Section 9,07. ./ ~c./\ . ,0 rH. _~ I. Il ~ A --:..' . '1,i~" . 'I. ~!f. - '\ <'~~ ~c=nn:#:::::::~ I . ~Cp~ ' \ r:'oDLAj2D:DI~~!~(~ " ' i 1 'ADD.' '...., 1 "C /' t ','" I '" ~ I " ....'" I I '<'l, . ~ I' "- :'="=;-"8 ----- ""--'.... ; 0 " l I ' - \ j) I \ I I ,~ 1/ I r / I I -n I ' r= ~I~ r 1'/ ,I ! I , i --------- , I~ I ADaZ: Location Map lill Iill Iii! I'I I!i: Iii Iii l r- Ii i i :;C'_<oo l_~-- i 1 '-ooo:oo+<,",<;:~ Ii ~;.'~"; , I -~f'-~ i ,_, -- -<::J'i'"".', _') f~11 ' ~ ! J o o OJ = o o ~ ',', '-' ".. ---; I I , i , I I J , i I , I '- : .1 I I I , I , I , ' i ';.."y [ --u~ "'iI? , '/ ---- >- II -.-J \ h ' il I \ II! ~ ~!I :: i'i " i!1 -': I;:::: I ) / I ~ / 1IIIIIIhl 'I -"..~<t _."10 A/IiII!JtINI---C r- rl - -~t~~~ =~ ,.~\-L-~ 1". I '1'1/1 "I"",,~ ~ ,,-~ I! \ '" j \&"1 . .........- ~ ~.. I[ l'-.....I:~11 ~, '~ ," I ' ,.~, I .... " ~~ I, U 'o~ '^l" ~~~~~,\.:-..,;:"-~.,,,,~,'\:.. ---" I 17.;iG'1, \. . i' . :"'. ' i \ ,', rfl=- sinG!:: . ~ \.::\. ;", -, ,,: . I , . .: '1(\ ,3 f3Pj ~ _(l.:~'__ ',.,' 1_ '.. ,~:';', " I -- I "!3"!"\i- : ~~-l,_----T1I.. "', ~1..1_..I.. L ' nrnQ lilt . 1 . . ,""""-- ,Jl;f'Q;lNJ~_#).o I I I - CSTArC~ 1 ;YrIH i ~ I,~. ' " RD. i , ii, I I ~ '~l/ ' . ~i ~ , ::.-, u__u_ Lu L_ _ : ~:......' \ i : ~.~~ il!!, ~- : ~ ,~;., ~ I il~"""" : I~",,;'~ :g' '~"'!f'. ~ I ' . l.ir" \?li, f'>.~ ". : \; " ~ ,.. " 0 : _ =---- ,7..:~ . __~ 1-'----- -- , -l ",,:':-- or.. ,. , :1 1,'''h'..#''''~~riRi ~:: i ~ ,=~ ~ \' ..:"~ ~~ ;, ~.'~?l"l '!,III,~" ~'-...../b. ~ SCHOOl.: I I...: ... ""'1 ,...;.r ..., Ie: 'I. ,. -, ,[. " ,.'...".., "''''~/..I'''I'I' , .~,./ -!II':. ','. f'--,;", v....' I-HB'~" . , j I ' . tb~ .:;\'f*!; --,-I "i'I.,'4~ ',~/ 11" ~ ''':'~DAj~ :"':"'L' , , ;:::: "~...... fi. : : ~,,::;;; ':", ~/ /. / '\ ,....- /:IArTfvr,...' Hr JI : WN, ~ .'~ io; I . ' . . ", I' . 4. ':S L . L ' , ~.:"'.." 'I: : . ,. -2/U'ji: ~::-'... '. ' !' ~ ",-OAKS_;. ,WlP; ~. . "-.' 'Q'. ~ J"r,' I I- . III,\. '':-V':-RI: ..'J:'A/ . ,'''''_" '. ' ',,,......,.....1 .~" . __-" _,_ _____L_b1__A_ :_"""'::";... I , II ll-I i I ! I ,i~F !!n"""J it :\:' I' . I'; \ It, '..---- !I', , II i -1; i, '\E~'~IC. 1 I' ' " /' I" I :i1 --: I jOAKSi . II! I..J I I '3 i ~ , - --, : III, ; I. iii' .\--- i::J , I I F'flE ~RT'-ENT \ I .<,1:>. "P ;;!'''''''''''-~r.- '~;irH;&A -l :~.~ I 31' : ,.iF l 7 , I I I " ~CX) ~~~~~ ~ to) N ~ a1 -"'CD I _<0_ I :ll "':S: U1 -: &.;. ____ I' .~\ .='- ----- ,.,....,;, ~ ---- /., , I ........ -:;rr \ . , ' . " J i ,'.11' ~ ~\ I :.....'..;;:1. ,. __ ,. . ,( 3 _ I " If-~~--'-''': I\~', ~ '\\ I._ . ~... :~. ~..'... ~');J ,j:.;;,.. ,. !: ,...:'.J '.:t;'.' ., -.;, .. ,1::,1 (I) . _.'!!I... . '. ..~ J 1 .~. -1' ,,,;,,;,_,::,I..:~I ' 7 ...~ !I . ~~~..-:._.-.. \l\'\ I .,. !j.j'1 :- ..;. i)' I ,... ~ t '1: ": ~ , I ... . . .: ~ . i' li')I' ' ' '.:j.{ ~I:il:t: ,: f': 4r...... Z-o: I . ~ .~ ,~~ .- N N -" 0 0 CD 0 0 CD U1 0 U1 . N . . N N 0 0 0 -" 0 0 0 U1 0 ~ ,\ r- ~ h. Cl ~ ~ ~ :JIII i;..'_~ i ;.' J , ,\ i "., j.,....:'. . , . ". I ,: , " 'I ~ V! ~..~' {l" '" '" ~...~~ .... A r . ,~ " J: I Fil'!' [;; ::><]' =1 :",~-L'f ~f" ----,~ +- . :. I " ,_ ,I .-...,' , .~l..;~ l:'r,~~~~ "tlA.l'-\ z Q en m :::! (") m )> m In - z en - )> :Eo mO ::D< enm m::D ~o nO m~ )>::D :Dm m:E: )>m ~ -- 3:< .m !="C en.. ")> ,tz :DC: m"C <~ m~ om ~ )> :II m )> )> c C m C -.. l jJ ..,. ~ 1D ~ " , MEMORANDUM DATE: January 2, 1998 TO: David Carlberg, Community Development Director Scott Erickso~~ity Engineer and Todd J. Haa~ City Engineer FROM: RE: Andover PUD Sketch Plan/Review #1 1, Ashford Development had originally indicated they are proposing private streets for this development. A discussion of private versus public streets will need to be made with the Planning and Zoning Department and the City Council. It appears that a 60' right-of-way could be dedicated with minor realignment of the street and proposed building sites and parking lots, The setback requirements would need to be varied as a part of the PUD to accommodate this. 2. It is anticipated that the proposed internal trail system would be a private system maintained by the Association, If the internal trail system is proposed to accommodate multi-uses, pedestrians and bicyclists, the trail width should be at least 10 feet wide, It is also suggested that the proposed internal trao/path be extended to both Nightingale Street to the west and Hanson Boulevard to the east. The proposed trail/path from Andover PUD through Burr Oak Run will need to be discussed with that developer, A 10' wide bikeway/walkway along Hanson Boulevard will need to be extended from the south to the proposed intersection on Hanson Boulevard. A 50-50 cost split between the developer and the City would be proposed similar to the adjacent developments. 3. The proposed service road located on the east end of the sketch plan should be relocated further west between the daycare and convenience store to provide for a safer intersection, allowing for future signalization, providing for additional stacking of vehicles, and provide for better traffic movements at this location, This relocation will still provide an access to Burr Oak Run and will need to be coordinated with the developer of Burr Oak Run. See letter form Anoka County Highway Department. 4. We are recommending left and right turn lanes exiting the site provided at both ends of the development to allow for better traffic flow in and out of the site. Additional pavement width and (if applicable) right-of-way will need to be dedicated, 5. The City may want to consider a Municipal State Aid Street (MSA) route through this development due to higher traffic volumes, Anticipated traffic volumes from this area: not including Burr Oak Run 2,960 vehicles per day (vpd)/ including Burr Oak Run aproximately 3,200 vehicles per day (vpd), ~-) 6, We would recommend that a 32 foot wide street (City standard in urban areas) be constructed for all streets, If a reduced width street is accepted a minimum street width would be 26 feet with no parking permanently designated on both sides of the street. Ordinance also requires a 60 foot minimum for the right-of-way, 7, The Planning and Zoning Commission as allowed by ordinance should consider requiring the adjacent property to the north and south to be included as part of the sketch-plan to show how this adjacent. property can be subdivided. 8. The developer will need to meet and discuss with the City how sanitary sewer and watermain will serve this site. The timing of the street and utility improvements will be based on the availability of service to the site, 9. Need to meet the requirements of the City of Andover Water Resource Management Plan, 10, Need to discuss the possibility of future municipal wells in this vicinity. 11, The developer is responsible to obtain the necessary permits from the Coon Creek Watershed District, DNR. U,S, Army Corps of Engineers, or any other that may be interested in the site. 12. Need to discuss with the Coon Creek Watershed District the 100 year flood elevation and any other concerns they may have, 1:t, Need review and approval by the United Power Association (UPA) and Northern Natural Gas Company to be able to work within their easement. 14, Need to submit a tree protection plan with submittal of the preliminary plat. 15. The developer will need to petition for improvements (sanitary sewer, watermain, streets and storm sewer). 16, Need to meet requirements of Ordinance 8 & 10 and all other ordinances that apply to the site, 17, Wetland Buffer Ordinance #114 applies to the site, 18. Need review by the Park and Recreation Commission as to the park dedication requirements. 19. The proposed street intersecting with Hanson Blvd, needs to be aligned directly across from the proposed access to Cambridge Estates. An offset alignment as proposed is not acceptable to the City, ': .I 20. The location of the proposed access to Nightingale Street needs to reviewed by the developer, The other streets and driveways in the area will need to be identified for location and spacing. ~- ) COUNTY OF ANOKA JANE K. PEMBLE Traffic Engineer Dave Carlberg City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, MN, 55304 Public Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD, NW" ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 (612) 754-3520 FAX (612) 754-3532 R E eEl V (_ 0 "c~ '7 . ~Oq7 December 29, 1997 :-,'~"J :; 1 !..J-i 1 ('vITY r'c 1\ \:~"'-I\/C"O ....) ; t-, I \; '-IV .~ l- J \ RE: Sketch Plan Andover Planned Unit Development Dear Dave: We have reviewed the sketch plan for the Andover Planned Unit Development, to be located west ofCSAH 78 (Hanson Blvd,), east of Nightingale St. NW (incorrectly identified on the plan as CR 109), and north of Andover School within the City of Andover, and I offer the following comments: Existing right-of-way should be adequate for future reconstruction purposes (75 feet west ofCSAH 78 RIW centerline). It appears that all applicable sight distance criteria can be met at the proposed roadway intersection with CSAH 78. The City and the Developer shall ensure that all applicable Sight Distance Requirements are met for this development. As discussed in a previous meeting with representatives of the City, the Service Road is not to be constructed on County Right-of-Way. In addition, we would prefer that the Service Road be constructed with as much separation from CSAH 78 as possible, and that the access point onto CSAH 78 line up directly opposite the access point proposed for Cambridge Estates. Since there currently are no plans for reconstructing this section of CSAH 78, and this Planned Unit Development as well as the proposed development of Cambridge Estates on the east side ofCSAH 78 will create the addition of new turning movements along CSAH 78, we request that the City of Andover consider the construction of left and right turn lanes on CSAH 78 at the new access location for both northbound and southbound directions, in conjunction with these two developments, Construction of these turn lanes would be the responsibility of the Developer and/or the City, Design details for the turn lane construction are to meet State Aid Standards, and be reviewed/approved by this department, Since access is to be made via a local roadway, right-of-access along CSAH 78 is to be dedicated to Anoka County. Calculations must be submitted along with a grading and erosion control plan that delineates the drainage areas for this site, The post-developed rate/volume ofrunoffmust not exceed the pre- developed rate/volume of runofffor the lO-year, 24-hour storm, utilizing the "SCS Method" with a curve number determined using Group C soils as a minimum, I An access permit and a permit for work within the County Right-of-Way is required and must be obtained prior to the commencement of construction, Contact Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator for the Anoka County Highway Department, for further information regarding the permit process, Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer \ ; -2- It should be noted that residential land use adjacent to highways will usually result in complaints regarding traffic noise. Traffic noise at this location could exceed Noise Standards established by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Anoka County policy regarding new developments adjacent to existing county highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures, The City and/or the Developer should assess the noise situation and take any action deemed necessary to minimize associated impacts at this site from any traffic noise. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. The City or the Developer should contact me when construction of the new city street is near completion, so that a stop sign installation at CSAH 78 can be coordinated by this department. If turn lanes are constructed on CSAH 78, we will also likely coordinate the installation of the appropriate traffic control devices within the County Right-of-Way. Please keep this department informed as. more specific plans for this site are developed, Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~\'II" /' !'. \~ki/ ----~ Jane Pemble Traffic Engineer xc: File 1997 City of A.IJover xc: Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator xc: Mike Kelly, Chief Right-of-Way Agent xc: Skip Anderson, County Surveyor '\, ) dmh/ ANDOVERPLANDEVEL ""~...' ..~",.. -";-,"-. .'. . ...., ,) ,,-., ,', '\ 1J) .. .,....., ;a ....-... :'#. .... ... . .... . ... .. ... ..... __~ .f'..........:~..~,. ....... ..... _. ..............~. ...-~. . ..'~~_.::'......"". ."'...,; ~~.Iliol'.,,:...~ _ ........-. Rl!glllar Amlo\':!r Plalll/il/g and ZOl/ing Commission !Heelillg lviiI/illeS - .lWlllat). 13, 1998 Page :: / (Sk':l~-h PIal/ - Lal/g/eM A Jdlfiwl. COfltlll/lt!JJ Chairperson Peek asked if there is a need to anticipate further development to t east. Mr. Carlberg st:lted there is a -ery large \.\'erland from the eastern border to CoRd ~o C missioner Squires felt the only i~sue a~ide from ,he relocation of the drivev.'ay is whether the [ commendation in 1994 to extend the street to the western propeny line still holds. The only thi ::J he finds that has changed is the arrangement \...ith the propeny owner to the west in terms of st sharing. The City Staff, Fire Chief and Review Committee are all recommending the exten ' n of the street for safety concerns and to meet ordinance requirements, which were the same co ems in 1994. Because of that, he feels the road to the west must be prO\,ided for. Then the issue' whether there are alternatives that allow that to happen and at the same time mitigate the impact the propeny owner. The City's Engineers have sugge~ted the possibility of only providing th easement at this time and escrowing the funds to build the road when the property to the west' developed. \[r. Carlberg stated the suggestion to escro by the Engineers is just an option. It is not something that has been do ne before but was giv as an option because of a financial hardship. One of the concerns of both Staff and \lr Langf is providing a road which is intended to ultimately provide access .to Verdir:, but that extensio could be stopped by the subdivision of one or two lots off the end ~f the street and houses ilt to prohibit any further road extension, Metes and bounds subdivisions of five acres or m e need only abut a street, but the escrow option would prevent that. Then to split the ~ots, that pI' peny owner may have to pay for the street. Another option may be to assess the property owne to the west for the construction of the street. The Commission gen ally agreed that provisions should be made for the extension of the road to the western property Ii e. With that, they agreed a variance would be needed fo~ the area to Lot I and that the dnvewa 0 that lot should be relocated to access the City street. There was a concern that a metes and b unds subdivision to the west could potentially prohibit the ultimate extension of the street to th west. There was also concern that those metes and bounds lots would have access to a street ' out having to pay for the cost of the street. They suggested further research be done on going tough the special assessment process so the property to the west would be assessed for its share fthe benefit. Possibly that can be accomplished by petition by Mr. Langfeld. Commissioner Sq . res suggested it is a judgement by the Council whether to change the policy and allow the shifting o the cost of th~ street to an abutting property owner. The Commission agreed. Mr. Carlberg tated the sketch plan \.vill be before the Council at their regular meeting on January 20, 1998, SKETCH PLAS - A.VDOVER PLA,V:VED UNIT DEVELOPillB..T - SECTION 22 _ CHDiTERTO.\' P-tRTSERSHIP ~[r C~r1berg reviewed the proposed sketch plan of Andover Planned Unit Development located in Sect!on 22 a$ presented by Chestenon Pannership. The property is zoned .\1-2, Multiple Family Zoning. is \.'.ithin [\.\0 development phases of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area, and is proposed ~:.."". :.... . '..... . "'''.'..'. '. .::.. .......I!.......~... ...Jo....;,......;....l..'ID'''1.;lfl !'l'~ 'I \.~ / RI!(:Itlar .4 IIdon!r Plallllill,';? alld ZOlling Commissioll i'vfl!l!fing .I,linll"!.) - .fa/wary 13, 11)<)8 Page 3 rSkdlh Plal/ - ,-!.//(Iol't:r l'lanl/l!d Cilif Dl!l'Idvpmc'l1l, CVnfl/1/II!U} to consist of 351 residential d\',elling units of mixed single family homes, to\'..-nhomes and apartments. A convenience store and day care facility are planned in the southeastern portion of the development, He reviewed the options to serve the site with sanitary sewer, noting the Citv Council has agreed to .. -. - (1110\\ .he e~tire i.1c\elopmem La instail utilities in 1998 provided they are available The privatization of the utilities anu streets is also being discussed. The Staff is recommending that an easement be obtained o\'er the t;tilities and that the utilities remain public. The Andover Review Committee is recommotnding tr,e street access to Hanson Boulevard be coordinated with the plat of Burr Oak Run to the south and Cambridge Estates to the east. The Anoka County Highway Department has suggested the frontage road be moved away from Hanson Boulevard for safety purposes. plus turn lanes be provided in the City meet. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the background which lead to the rezoning of the propel1y to \ [-2. Because of discrimination issues, the zoning was not tied to senior hausilt!;?, h0\\ ever, the developer has stated the intent is to gear the project toward empty nesters. The issue of public rinancing or a partnership \vith a nonprotit association is still being considered, which would mean the development could be limited to seniors. The intent of the day care was that some of the senic,rs would be able to \',ork at that facility. It is something that is being done in these types ofdewlopment5. There is no density increase in the development. It is being developed as a PUD b~cat.;se oftr.e mixed uses. Meriyn OttO, Hakanson Anderson, engineer for the development - explained they are seeing a change in the demographics v,ith single parent households bringing children into the elderly setting. The commercial center \vould support a service station, barber shop, beauty shop and pharmacy. The se:1iors c~,ujd access the commercial center through the trail system. They are also proposing an il'!door R V storage tacility of 12 to 14 units in the northwest area. The intent of the development is t()r the elderly, b'.lt that designation depends solely on the financing. If it is privately financed, they can't have age discrimination, If public financing is involved, there can be age limits, There will be further discussion on this. There are 60 acres, 40 percent of which are wetland. The PUD has been developed to ma'\.imize the many trees and to take advantage of the other amenities on the site, They have created a loop system of private roads maintained to City standards. The reason for private roads is it provides tlexibility in terms of setbacks of buildings, and they could make smaller roads with no parking allowed on the streets. There would be at least two parking spaces for each unit either in a garage or in a parking lot. They agreed that the underground facilities would be part of the City infrastructure. Recreational activities would be provided such as shuffle board, horseshoe pit. tennis court, volley court, badminton, half-court basketball, and garden plots. The trail system would surround the development. They do not have a problem extending the trail to Nightingale and Hanson Boulevard. They ....il! also attempt to have a trail extended to the south to Oak View Middle School. The housing would primarily be owner-occupied, and more than likely the senior apartments \1 \',Otdd be rental :Jnits There would be one association to maintain the tacilities. , j \lr Klas stated Staff is agreeing \',ith the county's recommendation to move the frontage road lllrther back [t is estimated the development will generate 2,900 vehicles per day from west to east. Another possibilicy is to designate an \ISA street through the development, as the feeling is the road will be used as a major route between ~ightingale and Hanson Boulevard. [1' it would be an MSA . '. -... . . <i'- .~ ..;.r-r .... . 0lIo:.". .:..... . '.. ...~ - ..:.w,......-...........,..... \ ) Reglllar Ando\'t!r Planning and Zoning Commission ;\-'feeling ,l.fil/lIleS - Jal//lwy 13, 1998 Page .j (,<'k~'b.:h I'lal/ - At/dOl'':/' Plt/i/I/ed ( ilil De"e1opm!:!ll/, COll/il/lf!:!d) meet, the developer would pay for the road as it would normally be built. and the MSA funds would pay for the extra class five and thickness of bituminous. The Staff also has a concern with the e'ienn.:al reconstruction of the streets if they are pviate. The City \vould' want to have some input in the organization ot'~he association to be sure the maintenance and reconstruction are done according to City standards. Commissioner Luedtke felt it is important to have an :\IS,-\ street or collector street through there, as there is no other east-west road between ~ightingale and Hanson Boulevard from Crossto\vn Boulevard to the south and CoRd 20 to the nonh. Mr. Otto stated their biggest concern with an MSA or collector street is the increase in traffic. This concept is aimed toward an elderly community. The Commissioners felt the road itself would encourage cut-through traffic. :\-fr. Otto continued that because of the stacking concern and the access onto Hansor. Boulevard, they are in agreement with the proposal to move the link to the south between the cay car~ and convenience center. They will continue to work on that configuration. but they do not want to see a cur.ilinear comer Because of the \vetland to the nonh. it doesn't look like an access is called for to the north. Also. the last thing they want to do is encourage traffic coming thrvugh that site. Commissioner Squires was concerned that a development of this magnitude has so few outlets onto major roads. Mr, Carlberg stated the large number of wetlands limits those accesses. Staff did not explore other outlets to the nonh or south. NIr. Otto stated v..;th senior housing, there will not be the typical rush hour traffic The traffic will be staggered throughout the day. Commissioner Wells stated :Jublic transportation tor seniors and emergency facilities need to be addressed. Commissioner Barry suggested the trail system should go both north and south along Hanson Boulevard and along Nightingale. After some discussion, the Commission felt that recommendation should be made to the Park and Recreation Commission, Mr. Otto stated they could extend the trail north along Nightingale, but there is a wetland to the south, After discussing the issues further. the Commission also suggested further study be done to provide access to the north and south for more outlets to the development. They asked that Staff look at the private versus public street issue and make a recommendation. They'd like to see the trails extended to the property lines along both Hanson Boulevard and Nightingale, It was also suggested that more park amenities such as picnic areas be provided. Because of the potentially large number of users, it was suggested the Park Department consider requiring more park on the site. There was also some concern about the main access to the property to the south going between a day care and the com'erJence center. and they suggested the pedestrian traffic be looked at, especially the nonh-south \ " flow It was suggested that the scale be reviewed relative to the setbacks from the road and the effect ot"the volume ot'traffic through there. A iesident didn't understand hO\\I this could proceed when soil borings haven't been done to d~!ermine whether or not the land will support condominiums. Chairperson Peek explained the property is already zoned tor multiples This is a concept plan ,"...hich meets the use requirements of ...... ~ . ...". ." . ~ ~... - ~~.:-_..." ., ..,...-.... -,.....'~~-....... , ) R!;!gll/ar And01'1!r P/wmil/t( and Zoning Commission :\fel!ling "',,!i/lIIt.:s - .Ic/J!/Iwy 13, N9R Page 5 tSkdl.;!I Flail - .-IlId,)\'er Plaml!;!d Cili! DI!\'e1opmellf, COllfin/lt!d) the zone From the Planning Commission's perspective. it is part of the process so the developers knO\v where to do the soil borings. There is some gamble on the part of the developers. Another concer:1 raised by the Commission was the location of a convenience center with the potential of selling videos and liquor so close to the middle school. A suggestion was to have a small banking facility available in that area, .\-fr. Carlberg stated a representative from the school district was:\'t as concerned with the proposed convenience center as it would be if there was to be a strip mall. ~Ir. Ono stated the conUTIunity center would be about 10,000 square feet. It could potentially be a neighborhood library or video sharing, privately owned for the association members only, He a!so noted that they have used the lot dimensions for the M-2 zone rather than the traditional lot standard At this point tht: recommendation was that the sketch plan be fOr\varded to the City Council; however, after reviewing the sketch plan for Burr Oak Run. the adjacent development to the south, the Commission felt that StatT should review both developments together for such issues as road alignment, acces.~ points, vehicular traffic. trails, etc. The Commission then asked that this sketch plan come back to them tor filrther review at the next meeting after the Staff has looked at these items. further. SKETCH PLAS - Bl/RR OAK RUN - SECTIW.i 22 - PILOT LAND DEVELOPJJENT COJ/PASY Mr Carlberg reviewed the proposed sketch plan of Burr Oak Run consisting of 44 single family residential lots located in Section 22 as presented by Pilot Land Development. The property is zoned R-I and will need to be rezoned to R-4, It is located in the MUSA and was scheduled to develop in 1999. The City Council agreed to allow this development in 1998, It may be serviced by two different sanitary sewer trunk systems. The sketch plan was presented based on a frontage road scenario, but he Pooted the January 12, 1998, letter from Pilot Land Development Company showing a revision to that proposal. The revision is to have the access between the proposed day care and cLmvenience center of the Andover Pl'D development proposed to the north. The Andover Review Committee is also proposing the trails be constructed along Hanson Boulevard, Trails connecting the development to the trail on Hanson Boulevard and to Oak View Middle School must also be discussed. The Staff has asked for a proposal to develop the property to the south and west and how access to ~ightingale would be provided, Those options are also included in the January letter, A problem with extending the road straight through to Nightingale is the wetland area adjacent to , , l\ightingale '- I The Commission noted that with Concept B. which is the one they generally favored. the City would lon~go the oppor:unity to establish a collector street or MSA through the property. Without an MSA street in either this development or the Andover PUD to the north. a main road between Hanson Boulevard and Nightingale would never be realized. There was concern with that, as it was felt the CITY OF ANDOVER REQUESTF,OR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ) DATE January 27, 1998 AGENDA ITEM 5. Sketch Plan - Andover PUD Section 22 Chesterton Partnership ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Planning David L. Carlberg BY: Community Development Director BY: Request The Planning and Zoning Commission is again requested to review and discuss the proposed sketch plan of the Andover Planned Unit Development located in Section 22 as presented by Chesterton Partnership. The Commission tabled this item at the January 13, 1998 meeting. The Commission requested further information regarding the Municipal State Aid (MSA) designation in the area, north & south outlets from the development and the issue of private Vs public streets. Municipal State Aid (MSA) Designation The City has designated an MSA road from Nightingale Street NW to Hanson Boulevard NW in the area of 1 54th Lane NW (see attached map). The Commission requested Staff review the need and if needed the possible location for an MSA road through the area of the Andover PUD and Burr Oak Run. However, since the last Commission meeting, the developer, Jerry Windschitl appeared before the City Council on January 20, 1998 during residents forum requesting the Council to make a determination on the MSA road. The Council determined that an MSA road as designated is not needed. The Council also noted that an MSA road through the development, which is designed as a senior development, would be a detriment to the development. The development is intended to be a closed environment for seniors and access should be limited. North and South Outlets The Commission requested Staff look at the north and south outlets to the development. An outlet to the north is possible with future connection being made to 1 57th Lane NW. However, immediate access would not be available as the area between Andover PUD and 157th Lane NW is undeveloped. The Commission has the ability under Ordinance No, 10, Section 6.02 to require the subdivider to sketch the adjacent property to the north. ) Page Two Sketch Plan - Andover PUD Section 22 Chesterton Partnership Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting January 27, 1998 An outlet to the south is possible into the Burr Oak Run development which would equally provide access or an outlet for the Burr Oak Run development as well. The Commission raised the issue of the lengthy cul-de-sac during the review of the Burr Oak Run sketch plan and the need for this connection. The Commission may wish to consider the comments of the City Council regarding limiting access to the development as stated earlier. Public Vs Private Streets Since the issue of allowing private streets in the City is a relatively new concept, Staff contacted a number of other cities to determine the pros and cons of private streets. The cities of Coon Rapids, Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Plymouth and Woodbury were polled. In general terms, Staff has learned that the major issues with allowing private streets appears to be related to the quality of construction and maintenance of the streets. All cities contacted stated they had problems with the streets being maintained even though homeowners associations were in place. In addition, Staff highly recommends that all utilities (sanitary sewer & water) be public, All cities polled did not support the privatization of utilities due to problems they encountered. Attached is a memo dated January 22, 1998 from John Hinzman, City Planner who conducted the research on this issue. The Commission may also wish to revisit the location and coordination ofthe eastern access between Andover Planned Unit Development and Burr Oak Run as both developers are expected to attend the meeting. The Commission may also wish to revisit the location and coordination trailway/walkway through both developments to the Oak View Middle School. . , , _/ , \. MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: RE: January 22, 1998 David L. Carlberg, Community Development Director John Hinzman, City Planner Private Street and Utility Survey I have contacted several cities in regards to the advantages and disadvantages of private streets and utilities, All cities contacted have allowed private streets, half have allowed public utilities, Quality of construction and maintenance have been common problems; most cities do not require streets to be built to city standards, Cities that have allowed private utilities have experienced problems with quality and compatibility with public system. Coon Rapids . Allows private streets and utilities -- must be maintained by home owners association. . Problems with maintenance of streets and utilities -- below city standards. · No control over quality, problems with street ponding and sewer back-ups in some developments. Eden Prairie . Allows private streets and utilities. · Problems with maintenance of streets and utilities -- below city standards, · Pressure to take control of streets by residents because of poor conditions. Minnetonka . Allows private streets, do not have experience with private utilities, . Quality of streets is substandard to City requirements, . Pressure to take control of streets by residents because of poor conditions. . Homeowners have been assessed to bring streets up to city standards when private control is relinquished. Woodbury . Allow private streets. Prohibit private utilities. . Require private streets to be constructed to City standards, · Inspects private streets during construction process, · Maintenance a problem -- pressure from residents to maintain private streets, , , o 0 c -.---.--.-....-- .._._---_.._._------_._-----~-------~----------------------------.-------... I . I : I,,' I I : 1'/r;"1~/^: : : I (),. I /, lJ\r.~ -,...~ I I I I\/(;r\r' .;Ill \...)., , : : \J,,: . ~ I I: I I " , I' I 'I , I I I I' , I I , 0 ------------~---------------------- -- -- -. -- -.. .................~.- -' , \ I 7 / .....-.--- - --~ --.... / ---~~- '-'-- I ( __, -- I .. .....-~--~--~... I" I - --- ~ I I J I -\ I I ( ,/ I I ...------ -........ ~/ I I / I .... --- --.~ \ \ \............. J ' I 1 .......---, j , .... ",' /- I "" I I ',._ / I /;{ 1.J> ~ ...__......... ,./ '-_/ /-' / ......--....." ..--/' (--'---------, ", 1-' I \ .... ---, /....--- //......" ....- "",,, --- I f, I / . I I \ , ,/..- '~./ ../" ...'" ......., ---- /, /-- ... ../ ," ... -------- I \ , , ,....__....... _._--"J...::....... , ~-- ....- ') ) I I I I I 1 , / I .- " " " .,ry.- I " I I I I . ~N~ \~~ '\., , , ',-- \~\\ -- '\\, \ ,- '~'__-" . 'v I .. I , ' , ' I J I I , I J I I J ..._---._~. ....90<'......__._, , J ... ;,,-/ / I I I , " ~ \ , / , I I /-~_.... I I o ~ / " - ! " .- .- I . \ .. \ \ , I , / '--'" i I i ~ ~.~.~. C ---.-----------.- ~ S ilig l", ____ _, __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ ,. __, ~ ~ I ~ ~ , ::ii"~i-' ~ CI) ~~~i ..J:IJ \ "'~i~i '::;,:-" , ;3 ~"df -I I" )"-'r_ ~ SfB! . '>c 9 " ~ z - ~,o . ...., -- ",","~"',",;;j ~ :J: .... (lao ........c 00 U) ~ tfdllr~ Q < ~ ~> ~~~i!!101O" 0 (\) "1"( "'a..... jl,,,, -~ _~...$ ...... ....... Omo -l -I.... ..... 1- ~ ~ p-,,,, ~1 '" c: (') ..~ J- '" '" ~ <~ Tf i"'oo ~ ' 1- U~ p"'''' !:;- ~ '"'......"'N~ ($ ~ ~ ., ~ r ~ 0 !~ ~ ) ~ ~ i~ ~ ~~~N"'N~ 1. ~ "~Ul ~ ~ 0. "" o (I " . ~ < ... (Ion ~ ;....; p ~ ~ ~c 0 . c::-J b ::l /' b N N 0 8 8 ~ t ~ 2 - ~ . '" /' N _ 8 S to u ~ ~ . ~ ..- !il ..- IT> ~ S ~ -! 1'1 ! \ I , CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 3. 1998 AGENDA SECTION ITEM No.7, Sketch Plan - Burr Oak Run Section 22 Pilot Land Development Co. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Community Development David L. Carlberg Community Development Director Request The City Council is requested to review the proposed sketch plan of Burr Oak Run located in Section 22 as presented by Pilot Land Development Company. The proposed sketch plan contains 44 single family residential lots. General Comments * . The proposed sketch plan is located in an R-l, Single Family Rural Zoning District. The developer will need to make application to rezone subject property to R-4, Single Family Urban. * The property is currently located in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The property was scheduled to develop in 1999 in accordance with the Andover Development Policy Guideline. The City Council has agreed to allow the development of the property in 1998. The property will be or can be serviced by two different sanitary sewer trunk systems. Staffwill discuss this issue in greater detail with the Commission at the meeting. * All lots shall be required to meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.06a(l) which relates to lot size and buildability requirements. In addition, the front 100 feet of each lot must be buildable which is a standard the City uses for lots developed with municipal sewer and water. * The Water Resource Management Plan shall be implemented with the development. '\ J , , ) Page Two Sketch Plan - Burr Oak Run Section 22 Pilot Land Development Company City Council Meeting February 3, 1998 * The 100 year pond elevation shall be identified on the preliminary plat. In addition drainage and utility easements are required for the 100 year flood elevations. Flood fringe and floodway boundaries shall be indicated on preliminary plat. * The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary permits (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Coon Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, LGU and any other agency that may have an interest in the site). Initial contact shall be made with the City Engineering Department regarding this item. * There are wetlands within the proposed development that must be delineated by agencies and indicated on the preliminary plat. The Local Government Unit is the Coon Creek Watershed District. The developer shall contact the CCWD to discuss the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act that is in effect. * The developer is required to meet the following City Ordinances and all other applicable ordinances. Ordinance No.8, the Zoning Ordinance Ordinance No. 10, the Platting and Subdividing Ordinance Ordinance No. 214, Diseased Shade Tree Ordinance & the Tree Preservation Policy Ordinance No. 107, Flood Plain Ordinance Ordinance No, 114, Wetland Buffer Ordinance Andover Review Committee Comments The Andover Review Committee (ARC) met on Tuesday, January 6, 1998 to discuss the sketch plan. Comments from the meeting are as follows: ) * Sanitary sewer and watermain extensions need to be considered and discussed, '- ' Page Three Sketch Plan - Burr Oak Run Section 22 Pilot Land Development Company City Council Meeting February 3, 1998 . * Coordination of the entrance street to Hanson Boulevard NW is necessary with plat of the Andover PUD to the north and Cambridge Estates to the east. * Review and discuss memo dated January 9, 1998 from Scott Erickson, City Engineer and Todd Haas, Assistant City Engineer. * Anoka County Highway Department reviewed the sketch. See attached letter dated January 2, 1998 from Jane Pemble, Traffic Engineer with Anoka County Highway Department. * Street extension through plat to Nightingale Street NW needs to be examined. Developer has provided a sketch of how property to the south could develop. * Trails and walkways. Trail along Hanson Boulevard NW is planned as a part of the Andover Comprehensive Trail Plan, Trails connecting development to the Hanson Boulevard NW trail and to the Oak View Middle School will also need to be discussed. * Wetland buffer protection will be required per Ordinance No, 114. * Sketch plan should show general location of significant trees. * IdentifY ponding areas. * Northern Natural Gas Company review needed due to the proximity of the Northern Natural Gas Pipeline. United Power Association review will be needed as well. \. ./ Page Four Sketch Plan - Burr Oak Run Section 22 Pilot Land Development Company City Council Meeting February 3, 1998 . It should be noted that some of the above listed items will need to be addressed as a part of the sketch plan review and some of the items will need to be addressed as a part of the preliminary plat application and review. The ARC is listing these items at this time for discussion purposes. Plannin~ and Zonin!! Commission Review The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and tabled this item at their January 13, 1998 meeting. The Commission requested additional information regarding the MSA designation in the area and the examination of a northern street access to the Andover PUD in the western part of the plat. Other issues or items of discussion are detailed in the attached minutes from the meeting. The Commission on January 27, 1998 discussed those issues raised at their January 13, 1998 meeting, The Commission dismissed the MSA designation as the Council had ruled on the issue at their January 20, 1998 meeting, The Commission does recommend a northern connection from Burr Oak Run to the Andover PUD in the western part of the development. The Commission recommends the construction of bikeway/walkway trails along Hanson Boulevard NW, Nightingale Street NW and a trail to the Oak View Middle School Park and Recreation Commission Review The Commission reviewed the sketch plan at their January 15, 1998 meeting, The Commission is recommending cash in lieu of land per Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07, Attached are the minutes for Council review. The City Council should remember that this item has not been studied by staff in detail as most of the detail will be reviewed as a part of the preliminary plat. " J ", ~ '<t , I I ~ N ~~ ~ 0 <.l<.l<.l <.l $ ,,;..:,,; 1 . ~ ~ ( f I <(<(<( ~ "''''''' lil . - I L ~~~ ~ ~~~.!! 111 : I i '-- - - - - --1 - - - ~ ..::- J n ~ ~; I i ~II ell ~ /: -:; - lil 5 ~ II i:\ i:\ ~ J'.! 999 3 I ~~~!3 ~ ~lii~ ~ ! I ~>-~ ~ >- '!;~~ ~ . gso! g g ::J~<( " I I , .1". ~ . .. .. . () ...* () -~ -'- , ,> 0 ~ I ~ v M - (fl .., ~ I~ I! ~~ ~ . ~ . ":> .- ~ -.. ..- P: ,~/ , ~ ~ ~ () ~ ~ I I ~ ~ tJ 4 ~ ~ ~ 8 t ~ ~i Q; h ~!s ~ I:l.; C) , . I 'J; EI . ~ ~ \.I!. ~ 111,~i I~' i!j I '-.) ~ U 1. ~ U~I~ ~n b 15 I ~~. ~ ~~J I H ~~ : ~ I Vj ~ ~ Ii ) ~ ~ II ~ ~ Cl d J l!1 Jll! nJ ~ ~ l}! J II Ie b ~~ C'l""\ "1 ~ f II ~ U ~ h ~ 1111 ~ I U ~ I g ~l Ci: ' ~ : in ~'-' c\ I ni c~ 1111 · II ~ .11' II j I II J 0 M " Illjl I I I liJlilif ~f~ IJ ~l~I:~il:!j~~J;l i Ilf~.' II 11 113 tl"ltt"l)llilU I f J ll':"~ ~lr II .~Ii ~~i~tl!I;~~ 1 s ,'ll~"llfl ~Jl I 1l111~lllf!tl~ill ~ ! If!Iji;"!I~: !;I! :i!ilj!II~!lii I . I l,uIJ!h~l~ illlt~IJI;181~!~:It I :c ~ , ~llIUJU I II,if 1>11 II" IA " I I Ji;:!iljli~fi iJIJI~li~~~l~!lliJI t il!J!l!li!II~!JI~!;!I~!ill'~li~iJil!l!i ~I llNJ 'I J~ IJ~ II'Adl) I, Ij. '16 i 'J 111~~15~~J!i!~!I'~f~SI:II~'fJJ~~ljJi I, 1 I 1 lIJi~lljJfliIIJllil"'8"1111,i!'~! J, . ----------- ----- i'~ ~dhd ~.I,,~.I~h~1 ~ dlUd ~ (6 'ON J..V'Icl J. VM -.1fO-J..HDIlI~ ----""l\.~~-+ t ---:l --- ~t.... . .. Ii --,------------------:-~-==~---~~~,------r_--- _ _ _J.J..NflOO_VXONV) _ _ _ _ __ _ _ 60r ~ON !!"O2!..., J..J..NflOO./ _ __ 't'l.&cq"ft~........lUllllflMSJOt/l2HIOItllJl...,.,7 - i I r Il ~.it 0 .' . .LL': .. 'I''V~'''''''AAC'' , ~ '" ...... I \! ' H" I J1;,.. . I " I " " ; . "rY:I."",. j ! -.:;A" ~ . , . ., ~ I ,,'. I .~,~ " I ------- .L_ )J::~ ....~'O:::::..-'-..~-------,f-~,h-h---"-' ! . - ,- ~:'~-=-;-7,~' - -- ~----=-=----'~ f-----.,-____ \.. I I ---; , t/~. ' ',,000......,1' I I WOODLAND =::.:::;" J ! I I '~, . I SECOND! ;" .t. ADD. I " " / I . ','" i I : " '\. : ~ " " ! I I ',), .' I" , --.:--<: -----" I , ~ "" I :--, 8 "', : !!:! Ii' -1', I i i ~~'''--'' i i I [I 1 I II JJI I ,.// rV ./ " ./ , / :A' ....YI i/ I .~ ~~ I" " I " '....... i r Location Map J I !/I I II I II " , I' Iii J I~ '~ II' '" !.: I. ~ ; Ii II! 1:1 lili liii , ---- -----, ' "'~_n' --..:-;.:~--==:::---- I: I 1....lIf)UV I ---'::.::__ : I!U~' --~"""-- ".': ! -~'::~i;.-_ Ii ..: -J~",," '_'J~f:,' . & L~ 1 " "--"- !~, ill"" " I "'.. II~ J ........ I II '~~ Ii ,~~ ;1: !i(~ ---:[:-,--, v/ J I I il: II ~,',_ Lr ~II ,-U -. .... ,li~ I _lil ~ -------11- ii ~~A/~/C ~" i;:V I /0~K$! . I ~,~ : I :i!. " ' !Ii: '...... lili ~~ I Iii' ~ 0;,.~ I ,", A ,~' ,. '.,. I :I'! ' A>\. , '.,;.~" M' I, ; f ~rr.~ '.,~.~~ 1:/: ,-~~- ~~< ~~~?~__ill._____~_ ;1 I ~ . ~ ',.~ : ~ It : ~ ~ :~ i.......... " . , : : :: ?iR-- , -. : :~ ;i'~': ;, ,: '~'I' I ill,,, /' '=- :~,,:,:. ::~ '.~ :,.~: h 11 ; ......'" ,.":' '" ""~/"" '('1'11 ' /, (' / ,~1If 1:1'''. !.! .~b d HJl:J:W.):.;O!"!,'ib ~ m /, / / 1111 " '- ./ ~p.j2. I ' ~I o o '" := 5"!L - ,4 -8 .. , ~ - A ~. ~~ . iI frd --::-- -- .-- , i i'll .: I .i:n'i ~ r ~ ; i I I) \11 ""-.:.- I I : I I : I i i ! ' -, M---'=:f H;',~ 4::~,~, /~ · I-JL' ............ -r_::~ ,_. '0rJ. \- I ,">= ~ l" . ...... -' ~' ': ~// I "I"v'f r-- - >,---i~:, II! \." j ,.,~"~ '3( " - --.J -I', i .......J '--" '........ : ~ i , --,.--.+- I , i I I ! I '-. !----, , ,,; 1.l[.I,)...,'!----- t!:;iGf~N\ ' '1" i ------------- ~, Iff':. ~Gf; " . , . ~'(,3 ~I[) I ~ ( . . 13"1 .\L ~ r:lla 'w " 1 i ,I ~ ~ ~";::;:LE ~-;:; j" !r-- . I " ~1'if!;~, I ~ " 1>"'" ::._, ~ ,,;/\ ~'5' - lL ~ (JIIdt'*P ~-- . ~I~ I I I ---- -J ___ : i~ . i FIRE OEPAFlT'-EHl ') i I I i I - , , '.- i """"'TO- .~ .. .<,1:.. po q 1- Ll- HOuIt I I I, , ADC h o o ~ I. I" II, ,I 1-... r " ,I ,I 'I , , !'---' ~ I ==---1 I I . il~~F I, ~fL!/? --' if l:K" ,"/ !' d: =;-i . IIi i ~ , ..&i ~ .\- ~ Mr;. -.. .:.' .,..... : , 't ..,;" ---- ~-'--""""-'~~""'-- ~- , ---------- \~ I ' ''':-I'' . I ~.."'::: I co_~(., 5~::: " .."" ~ } , / I , L, I I I , I L___ 8 ~ .. \ ) II) ,- en ""- ,'<t -- CO ~ ~ 1'[ l ' \ ~ wQ ti~ c> Q,W ~a: z""':" e(e( ...Jo Q,CI.! W~ >~ -- ~e( Ww :r:a: We( a: Q,w :E~ 0> Oa: a:W wen >OlX w ~> .. c w C C < < w a: < < .'."~" :. '.. r , ij il'" . , ~ '" '" , ~.~ ,~\ ~ :'. ' . :.:, t " :: I '. ~ . .' \, ~ I .. lIi-r" - en Z - ~ ...: ::) ti c i!'; ;!; In 0 ,.. N -- -- 0 0 ~ 0 ::i N N I I lD 0 In 0 ::) ,.. ,.. 0 D- o 0 N N 11111III1I'_u "'" __L._- "'" -.....-- "'" ,---- ~~~~~ i=:=:==.:' J .j I ' ~ . ~. - ~.., , J Ll, I ',. " <:l ~ ~ Cl '<( Q: ..., W ..J lD < w Q > a: w en 6 z II) o o N I o o o N o o o N I In en en ,.. o ,.. o N I In o o N ~ . ': : . .,. , , ~ ~ : l~. ; -. , } i .tl' . '.. I ~'-.,.~ '~-J.~-~J : r- .s. Vi rr~1:; '!,::,.:;Z....,~- '~"'.. . """~ I "~~ '.;:".' '..,I'~~. :1' . I l" "~ . " " , -' -" \: ~ ...." :- ,.-ft!!!I_~. "~ I '. ~~t""~;-: I 1.'.r'I't., ~"l""t~ .~ ('. .1. " r.~"lt, l~ II' . 38,' '\ \.. j Memorandum DATE: January 9, 1998 TO: David L. carlb~f9' Community Development Director Scott EriCksorO'e!ty Engineer and Todd J, "H-::; Asst. City Engineer Burr Oak Run Sketch Plan/Review #1 FROM: RE: 1, It is recommended the easterly part of the sketch plan be reconfigured to allow the access to Hanson Boulevard from this plat to be located further west in the project. By doing this it will provide for a safer intersection, allow for future signalization, provide for additional stacking of vehicles and better traffic movements at this intersection, This relocation will still provide an access to Burr Oak Run and will need to be coordinated with the developer of Andover PUD, See letter from Anoka County Highway Department. 2, It is recommended that a dedicated park land for a multi-use trail access be provided at the east end to allow for residents to access the future Hanson Boulevard bikewaylwalkway trail. Also, the developer should coordinate the possible construction of a trail from the Andover PUD project through Burr Oak Run down to the school. The location of this aC,cess should be coordinated between the developer of Andover PUD, Oak View Middle School, and the developer of Burr Oak Run, 3, A 10' wide bikeway/walkway along Hanson Boulevard will need to be extended within the right-of-way along Hanson Boulevard. A 50-50 cost split between the developer and the City would be proposed similar to the adjacent developments. 4. The Planning and Zoning Commission as allowed by ordinance should consider requiring the adjacent property to the north and south to be included as part of the sketch plan to show how those properties can be subdivided, Maybe it would be a consideration of the Commission to request both or all property owners adjacent to this project meet and discuss how areas could potentially be developed, Note: The proposed street serving Lot 30 and 31 of Block 2 and Lots 12 and 13 of Block 1 will need to be evaluated in further detail to determine if this location is the proper location to serve the adjacent properties to the South. This will need to be evaluated in further detail at the time of preliminary plat submittal. 5, The developer will need to meet and discuss with the City how sanitary sewer and watermain will serve this site, The timing of the street and utility improvements will be based on the availability of service to the site, \ 6. Need to meet the requirements of the City of Andover Water Resource Management Plan. ) , ) 7. Need to discuss the possibility of future municipal wells in this vicinity, 8. The developer is responsible to obtain the necessary permits from Coon Creek Watershed District. DNR, U,S. Army Corps of Engineers, or any other that may be interested in the site. 9. Need to discuss with the Coon Creek Watershed District the 100 year flood evaluation and any other concerns they may have, 10. Need review and approval by the United Power Association (UPA) and Northern Natural Gas Company to be able to work within their easement. 11, Need to submit a tree protection plan with submittal of the preliminary plat. 12. The developer will need to petition for improvements (sanitary sewer, watermain, streets and storm sewer). 13, Need to meet requirements of Ordinance 8 & 10 and all other ordinances that apply to the site, 14, Wetland Buffer Ordinance #114 applies to the site, 15, Need review by the Park and Recreation Commission as to the park dedication requirements. 16, Need to request variance from Ordinance 10 for lots 25 and 26 on Block 2 to allow access onto Nightingale Street NW which is designated as a municipal state aid street. 17, Need to provide a 50 foot tangent between reverse curves as required by Ordinance, 18. Need to revise the existing street name on the west side of project and indicate as Nightingale Street NW, Also, this street is no longer a county road. 19, A connection to Nightingale Street is recommended. The evaluations of wetlands will need to be reviewed with the Watershed District and the developers at the time of preliminary plat design, 20, Additional comments pending further review, " J 2 01/08/98 l~:OO ~{X 612 75~ 3532 ANOKA CO HWY DPT 141001/004 COUNTY OF ANOKA January 2, 1998 Public Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD, N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 (612) 662-4200 FAX (612) 862-4201 JANE K. PEMBLE, TRAFFIC ENGINEER DIRECT DIAL NUMBER (612) 862-4231 Dave Carlherg City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, MN. 55304 -4f(" TO to-- \v ~\i-yV RE: Sketch Plan Ce~ks Dear Dave: We have reviewed the ~kctch plan for Center Oaks, to be located west ofCSAH 78 (Hanson Boulevard). south of the Andover Planned Unit Development, and north of Andover Middle School within the City of Andover, and I offer the following Comments: Existing right-or-way adjacent to CSAH 78 should be adequate for future reconstruction purposes (75 feet west of CSAH 78 RlW centerline). It appears that all applicable Sight Distance criteria can be met at the proposed roadway interscction with CSAH 78. As discussed in meetings with City staff, however. an access point to CSAH 78 is not acceptable to this dcpilrtment unless it is included in a p'lan to combine access Onto CSAH 78 with the plans for the Andover Planned Unit Development directly to the north, and the single aecess point lines up directly opposite the future access to Cambridge Estates. The City and the Developer shall ensure that all applicable Sight Distance requirements are met for this devclopment. As SUIted in a previous review, please nOle there currently are no plans for reconstructing this section of CSAH 78. Since this plat will create the addition of new turning movements along CSAH 78, the City of Andover may wish to consider the construction of turn lanes on northbound and southbound CSAH 78 at the new intersection point, in conjunction with this development. Construction of these turn lanes would be the responsibility of the Developer and/or the City. Design details for the turn lane constmction must meet State Aid Standards, and be reviewed/approved by this depllrtrnent. Since access for all lots is to be made via local roadways, right-of-accessing along CSAH 78 is to be dedieated to Anoka County. Calculations must be submitted along with a grading and erosion control plan that delineates the drainage arclls for this site, The post-developed rate/volume of runoff must not exceed the pre- developed rateJvolume of runoff for the Io-ycar, 24-hour stonn, utilizing the "SCS Method" with a curve number determined using Group C soils as a minimum. If any work is to occur within the County Right-of-Way, a penn it is required and must be obtained prior to the commencement of construction, Contact Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator for the Anoka County HighwlIY Department for further Information regarding the permit process, " ) It should be noted that residential land use adjacent to highways will usually result in complllints regarding traffic noise. Traffic noise at this location could exceed Noise Standards established by thc US Department of Housing lII1d Urban Development and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Anoka County policy regarding new developments adjacent to existing county highways Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer 01!08/9~ 14:01 FAX 612 754 3532 ANOKA CO HWY DPT I4J 00%/004 j -2- prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures. The City and/or the Developer should assess the noise situlltion and take any action deemed necessary to minimize associated impacts at this site from any traffic noise. Due to the proximity of the Northern Natural Gas Pipeline, the sketch plan must also be ~evjewed by the Northern Natural Gas Company. (Please see attached). ' Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If'tum lanes are constructed on CSAH 78, We will likely coordinate the installation of the appropriate traffic control devices within the County Right-or-Way. Please keep this department infonned as more specific plans for this site are developed. Feel free to contact me if you hllve any questions, Sincerely, -t/L ~~ Jane Pemble Traffic Engineer xc: File 1998 City of Andover xc; Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator xc: Mike Kelly, Chief Right-of- Way Agent xc:: Skip Anderson, County Surveyor xc: Northern Natural Gas Company dmh/CENTEROAKS '\ J .... ~ .... ...... -..:~.: ,4;';. . 4", ..,. ,. "...."'" ..-~. ''''~~'~.h~.h..-''J''''''''..>>.L................. I Regular .4./IdOl'er PlaJ111i/l~ and Zoning Commission !o.leeting i'v/ill/il/!S - Jauuary I J, 1998 Page 5 fSkl:'/c:h Pla/l - ..J/lduver PIa/lIle" Ullit Del'elopmt!llI. COlllillllt!d) the zone. From the Planning Commission's perspective, it is part of the process so the developers know where to do the soil borings. There is some gamble on the part of the developers. Another concern raised by the Commission was the location of a convenience center with the potential of selling videos and liquor so close to the middle school. A suggestion was to have a small banking facility available in that area. Mr, Carlberg stated a representative from the school district \vasn't as concerned with the proposed convenience center as it would be if there was to be a strip mall. Mr. Otto stated the conununity center would be about 10,000 square feet. It could potentially be a neighborhood library or video sharing, privately owned for the association members only. He also noted that they have used the lot dimensions for' the :\.1-2 zone rather than the traditional lot standard. At this point thl: rtcommendation was that the sketch plan be fomarded to the City Council; however, after reviewing the sketch plan for Burr Oak Run, the adjacent development to the south, the Commission felt that Stat'!:' should review both developments together for such issues as road alignment, acces.~ points, vehicular traffic, trails, etc. The Commission then asked that this sketch plan come back to them tor filrther review at the next meeting after the Staff has looked at these items. further. (\;) SKETCH PLA,\i - BURR OAK RUN - SECTION" 22 - PILOT L4J..'.fD DEVELOPII,IENT '0/ COMPANY :vlr Carlberg reviewed the proposed sketch plan of Burr Oak Run consisting of 44 single family residential lots located in Section 22 as presented by Pilot Land Development. The property is zoned R-l and will need to be rezoned to R-4. It is located in the i\tfUSA and was scheduled to develop in 1999. The City Council agreed to allow this development in 1998. It may be serviced by two different sanitary sewer trunk systems. The sketch plan was presented based on a frontage road scenario, but he noted the January 12, 1998, letter from Pilot Land Development Company showing a revision to that proposal. The revision is to have the access between the proposed day care and convenience center of the Andover PUD development proposed to the north. The Andover Review Committee is also proposing the trails be constructed along Hanson Boulevard. Trails connecting the development to the trail on Hanson Boulevard and to Oak View Middle School must also be discussed. The Staff has asked for a proposal to develop the property to the south and west and how access to )iightingale would be provided. Those options are also included in the January letter, A problem with extending the road straight through to Nightingale is the wetland area adjacent to \ l\ightingale. , I The Commission noted that with Concept B, which is the one they generally favored, the City would forego the oppor:unity to establish a collector street or MSA through the property, Without an MSA street in either this development or the Andover PUD to the north, a main road between Hanson Boulevard and Nightingale would never be realized. There was concern with that, as it was felt the ',IL"'. .. ..'--' . ....- ..... .'~' . ._. .. .......".,;.. '."!-,.:...,~~...,..,~..,,~ , Rt!gular Andover Planning alld Zoning Commission Afeeting ~\/il1ltl/!s - January /3. 1998 Pag/! 6 fSkt!!ch Plan - Barr Oak Run. Colltillut!d) traffic would naturally use the developments as a shortcut to Hanson Boulevard, However, they understood the desire of the developers to avoid through streets in the neighborhoods and the problem with the wetlands. The discussion continued on the reasons for MSA streets, the advantages and disadvantages and whether or not one is needed in either this development or the one to the north. The Commission then asked that Staff look at the issue and make a recommendation on the need: and ifit is needed. on a possible location, They also asked for the Staffs opinion on any north-south street alignments. The Conunission agreed \.\lith moving the service road further west, though there was some concern that that area could become a bottleneck for traffic with no other outlet for the development, They also agreed with the trail along Hanson Boulevard, plus a trail along Nightingale and a trail to the ~Ol!th to the school \[r. Carlberg stated they will work with the school district regarding an access location to the school property. Another concern of the Commission was that until the property to the south is developed, the street would be a tremendously long cul-de-sac. Because of that, it was felt there needs to be a link to the north to the Andover PUD. C ommis~i.:>ner Barry was concerned with safety because of the number of cars being added to the road system with this developed and the one to the north. No consideration is being given to signage, right and left turn lanes. etc. Leon Opatz. engineer on the project. explained the parcel is very narrow. and there is not a lot of ro(lm !i')f streets. storm water ponds plus mitigation. There are significant trees, and they would be intere:,ted in a variance for the front set back of 2S versus 35 feet for the southern iots along the school district property to save those t:-ees in the rear of the lots, They can look at providing a link to the nonh, They have proposed a cul-de-sac to the west so the wetland is not impacted, They will work with the Staff on the Commission's concerns, At this time the Commission suggested that Staff review both this sketch plan and the Andover PUD sketch plan together regarding those issues raised this evening and then both brought back to them. Mr. Carlberg stated they will place the sketch plans on the January 27 agenda. OTHER BUS/NESS Council appoilltmellt of Chair and Acting Chair - Mr, Carlberg explained the Council needs to '. appoint a Chairperson and Acting Chair and have asked if Chairperson Peek and Commissioner '. J Squires are interested in being reappointed. Chairperson Peek stated he believes in the policy of rotating the appointment every year and suggested if anyone is interested, they should contact the Statfto let the Coun.::il know. (/Jdate - January t5 City Council meeting - Mr. Carlberg reviewed the actions taken by the City Council at their January 6 regular meeting. " CITY OF ANDOVER / " AGENDA ITEM 6. Sketch Plan - Burr Oak Run Section 22 , Pilot Land Development Co. REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE January 27, 1998 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA Planning David 1. Carlberg BYCommunity Development Director BY: Reauest The Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to review the proposed sketch plan of Burr Oak Run located in Section 22 as presented by Pilot Land Development Company. The Commission tabled this item at the January 13, 1998 meeting requesting additional information regarding the Municipal State Aid (MSA) designation in the area and a northern street access to the Andover PUD. MSA nesi~nation As, indicated in the staff report of the Andover Planned Unit Development, the Council at their January 20, 1998 meeting indicated they do not support a MSA street in the area. The Commission may wish to discuss this issue further. North Access to Andover pun The Commission was concerned with the lengthy dead end cul-de-sac created in the development until the property to the south developments. The Commission stressed the need for a street connection from to the north to the Andover Planned Unit Development. Staffhas asked the developer's engineer to be address the best location for this connection based on wetlands, etc. The Commission will need to discuss this issue further. The Commission may also wish to revisit and discuss the western street alignment with the Andover PUD, trailway/walkway location to the Oak View Middle School and the request of the developer to vary from the thirty-five (35') foot frontyard setback requirement. \ ) ~". ,... " ~~, . I r .rv " J ''-- . , 'I.+- ,! 1'25, 0 I ~ I '_CUJ; . -':, ". V n h " I ;: t; 'I I_ -- r'- .-'-..'-- .. ___u,. - ,---+ -j~!--~kl:~~ , 'J -" -""-'-' -t -t '6 I ,~ G ; - ~ --"t.' ;::.:. : ~". ~ "--~ ~ '+'?~r6(it~~f[J- >';1 .. . .'; J 1 J 1 I Ca - . ~ Cl ~\' - to 11 ------- / \ ) .., .'~' .. . -; ';"0" --- - .. ~'-!,~ /~ wj?P>> 1- I CZ [J. A-~ aMI{ /vVYI [~ ~ I " ./ ~: /.'_~I f.r . ..." . -l- ","" 1 \ J<l!gll/L'J' Am/on:" j'oJ'k ol/d /'l!eJ'ewiol/ ('o/llmiss/lJI/.\leelil/g \ J/ !\/iilll!e.\' -.la/lilt""" i5. jfJt;-\ ~ '\ I I)({g~ .~ !JVRR OAK RCNSKETCll PI.AS \11', Haa~ reviev.ed the proposed sketch plan of Burr Oak Run located immediately north of the Oak V;e~\ ;\.l;ddle School. The property is proposed to be developed for R-4, Single Family Urban devdopment T1e Planning Commission has asked Staff to look at a potential ivISA street through either .his properTY or that of the Andover PlJD to the north. Access to the development will be through the Andover PUD to Hanson Boulevard. The road proposed to go sOllth which is shown in the \\iestern portion of the property \vill not connect with Tower Drive. The Planr.ing Commission had also suggested there be a road access north to the Andover PUD to\-\iard the western end of this plat. They also suggested that the Park Board consider requiring the construction of the trail along both Har.son Boulevard and ~ight;ngale to connect with the other trails, Andover PliD is also proposing a trail from their development south through this one to connect with the school. Because cf the school being adjacent to the development and the City Hall complex to the south, the Conmlission suggested cash be taken in lieu ofIand for park dedication. They also agreed with the construction or' the trails along both Hanson Boulevard and Nightingale plus one to access Oak View Midd!e Schon!. :VIr. Haas stated those trails would be tarred as a part of the street project. REVIEW ADUf. T SOFTBALL TOURNAME\T APPLICA TION FORlI/CO:\Tl1\'UED The Commission had a lengthy discussion on the proposed changes to the Adult Softball Tournament appliclt!on form that were discussed at the January 6 regular Council meeting It was generally agreed triat the damage deposit would not have to be submitted with the application, but there was a debate on whether the tees and deposit should be submitted eight weeks or four weeks prior to the tournament, It was tinally agreed that the fees must be received eight \\ieeks before a tournament. Tha: \'ould allow enollgh time to invite other tournament applications in the event one is canceled. It \-..as als0 agreed that applications received less than eight weeks before a wurnament date would be subject to a ~O percent penalty Toe Commission also discussed at length the issue of requiring an Anoka County Sheritfs Deputy to be at the tourn31:1ent at all times The Council had discussed the possibility of requiring Staff to be t1ere instead. StatT' would do maintenance, would have the authority to call games in case of ir:.c;e:m::~: weather. a:1J wot;ld call the police if there \vere violations of statutes and ordinances. Th~~ liked the idea ofha\ing Staff on hand but noted there may be an issue with the Public Works ll~j0" Ci)n~r2.ct and 'x:th the ,cheduEng of StatY if there are many weeke:1.d ti1urr.amer.ts. Another ict.l \, i.lLlid b~ to hire adults soeciticallv for tournaments, based on the same idea as the ice rink , ' altemjan:s \lr H.1,-'S stated the Public Works Depar.ment has ir.dicc.red the charge ofS300 per tield \\<::.i::1 co'e1' the City's cost 01' ha\ing !\\o Statr on hand during adult IOl:rnarnents CITY OF ANDOVER REQUBTFORCOUNOLACTION '\ j DATE: Febmary J, 1998 AGENDA SECTION Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT City Clerk 0.0. ITEM NO. ??', Outlot A, Brandon's Lakeview Estates Anoka County has requested that the city purchase Outlot A, Brandon's Lakeview Estates, which is tax forfeit. This parcel borders Round Lake and Chapter 319 of the 1996 Session Laws (a copy of which is attached) has set requirements on parcels bordering on public water. The law states that the county has determined that it would be best if the property were sold to the city. However, according to Subdivision I, section (d) of the law, there is nothing we can do with the parcel. The Park and Recreation Commission discussed this at their last meeting and agreed not to purchase the outlot but that it should remain as government land in its natural state, Attached is a copy of their minutes. If Council decides to purchase the parcel the cost would be $10.00 plus the recording fee of $19.50. Ch.31'1 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1'1'16 200 Sec. 2. CONVEYANCE OF TAX-FORFEITEIJ LAND BORIJERING ON PUBLIC WATER; ANOKA COUNTY. Subdivision I. SALE REQUIREl\IENTS. (a) Notwithstanding Minnesota Stat- utes, sections 92.45 and 282.018, subdivision I, Anoka eounly may convey the tax-for- feited lands bordering public water that are descrihed in subdivision 2 under the remain. ing provisions of Minnesota Statutes. chapter 282. --- (h) The county has determincd that the county", land management interests would best be served !.f the lands were sold ~ the cities iIl which they are located. (c) The conveyances must be in a fonn approved by the attorney general and must provide that the lands ~!.'! Ihe st'lte !.f they are not used for open space purposes. (d) No landscape changes. storm water discharge. or watercourse alterations that af- fect the hydrology and vegetative characteristics of the lands are allowed beyond those conditions that exist at the lime ()rthe transferor sale illOnJcr that tile wetland characlclis- tics and resulting wildlife Il.a~at~ a~ ~aillta;;,ed iIlperpetuity; Subd. 2. DESCRIPTIONS. The lands that may be conveyed are located in Anoka county andare legally described as follows:--- --- (I) City of Anoka (PIN No. 35-32-25-31-0(03), all that part of the Northeast Quar- ter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 35, Town\hip 32, Range 25, Anoka County, Min- nesota lying southerly of the centerline of a creek, said centerline being described as fol- lows: -- -- Commencing at a point on the cast line of Governmcnt Lot 2, Section 35, Township 32, Range 25 distant 120 feeillorth fromthesoutheast corner of said Government Lot 2; thencenortherly along Ihe east line of said Government Lot 2, said line having a bearing of North and South, for a distance o{T083.00 feet to the cemefiine of creek; thellce North 44 degrees 58 minutes 20 secondsWest a distance of '17.2'1 feet; thence North 67 degrees 56 minutes 46 secondsWest a distance of 138.64 feet; thence North 75 degrees 56 min. utes 46 seconds West a dista,!ee of 216:92 feet; thence South 8'1 degrees 39 minutes 55 seconds West a distance of ISO.IYfect; thellce South 57 degrees 56 minutes 35 seconds West a distance of 416.78feet; thence South 70 degrees 54 minutes-50 seconds West a distance of 283.00 feet, moreor less. to its intersection with the northerly shore line of the Mississippi River extended southeasterly across said creek centerline and there termlnat. mg. Also known ~ part ~Lot 26, Auditor's Subdivision No. 96, Anoka County, Minne- suta. And all that part of said Lot 26, Auditor's Subdivision No. '16, Anoka County, Min- nesota lying northerly"f said centerline of creek, lying southerly of the south line of Lot 31, said Auditor's Subdivision No. '16. and lying eastcrly of the west line of said i:Oi'31 ,,~tended southerl~ to sai~ ""nterline (~creek. - - - - - - - -- (2) City of Anoka (PIN No. 35-32-25-31-no(6), Lot 31, Auditor's Subdivision No. 96,' Anokacounty, Minnesota, according to the plat on file in the office of the Anoka County Recorder. ---------- (3) City of Anoka (PIN No. 35-32-25-34-{lOOI), all that part of Government Lot 2, Section 35, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota lying southerly of a line hereinafter referred ~ ~ line "B," said line "B" being described as follows: -- New langua~e is indicated by underline. deletions by slrikcout, 201 Beginni! sion No. '16. ;\ erly of the ,,;i, and liS soulfi" 45 degrees 00 ~ River anlE Except! Also eXl' Also exc Camlll('!! ka County, Ivt'i corder, said--z't "A"; thence S. sian of the m~1 41 mmutesOO East 31O.00r, degrees 07 n11 seconds East, feet; thence S. degrees 55 Iili south 21O,OlJ'1 erly along sail line "A:' as n' parallellilie ii, line "B"lOa-1' beginning:-- Also kn" (4) City, Quarter of the 35. Township, westerly right. tor's Subdivi" Except th 32, Range 25, Beginnin. 10. as the same' ier OTlhe SouII southeast cum 342.60 feet; Ih, 323,70 feet, ill, southeasterly-:: U.S. Highway Also klH)\ ~' '. -, " 201 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1996 Ch.319 ... ) .. ,.<lJERING ON '~~" ~,. Beginning at the intersection of the southwesterly line of Lot 14, Auditor's Subdivi- '('" lion No. 96, Anoka County, Minnesota and a line parallel with and ISO.OO feet northwest- -;:.c..: my of the southeasterly line ~ said Lot 14; thence southwesterly along said parallel line 'j'; and its southwesterly extension soruJO feet; thence southwesterly deflecting to the right ,', 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds 900.00 feet, more or less, to the thread of the Mississip- -r-------_______ I!! River and said line "B" there terminating. Except Lots 28 and 29, Auditor's Subdivision No. 96. Also except the south 120.00 feet ~ said Government Lot ~ Also exccpt all' that part ~ ~~I, 90vernment Lot ~ described ~ follows: " Commencing at the northeast corner of Lot 7, Dickenson's Mississippi Estate, Ano, ?:J bCounty, Minnesota, aceoruing to the plat on file in thc office of the Anoka County Re- ~{~:a;rder. said comer being the point of heginnin--g(lf":1lme hercil1.'lfter referred to as line I~:~') . .-A"; thence South 67 degrees 00 mimltcs 00 sccolliis East along the southeasterlY exten- f'_:-:.~________ _ ;:~".~' ~{""! I)fth;.~ north line of -;:lid Lot 7 ~md ~long line "^" 75.00 fect; Ibcllcc Sliuth 85 degrees t' 4lminiiies 00 seconJSEast 19S:00 feet; thence South 04 uegrees 19 minutes 00 seconus ~t 310.00 feet ~ the point ~ beginning ~ the lanu ~ be uescribed; thence South 33 '(, ,iltgrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East 213.10 feet; thence South 44 degrees 42 minutes 00 ~,;:~nds East 300.00 feet; thence South SI degrees IS minutes 00 secondS-East 230.80 ,G,,::fcet; thence South 37 degrees S3 minutes 00 seconds East 300.00 feet; thence South 44 ',aCgiees S5 minutes 00 seconds East 300.00 feet, more or less, to the north line of said 'iOiiiiiTlO.OO feet of Government Lot 2, and said line "A "there terminating; thence east- ',~ along said north line ~ ~ point on ~ line parallel with and 66.00 feet easterly ~ said ; Iiii "A," as measured at right angles to said line "A"; thence northwesterly along said '-lclTIne toa point on said line "B"described above; thence southwesterly along said "B"lOapoint on said line "A"; thence southerly along said line "A" to the point of lieginning.------- ------- i';"", Also known as a part of Lot 27, Auditor's Subdivision No. 96. :r.':'-'_>-------- - ,>:\r (4) City of Anoka (pIN No. 3S-32-25-43-000 I), all that part of the Northwest '1,~ ______ _____ :, Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section !.'3f.ToWiiShip 32, Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota lying southwesterly uftiie south- 'mlerly right-{)f-way line ~V.S. Highway No..IQ: Also known ~ part ~Lot ~ Audi. "'lOr's Subdivision No. 28. .1,." -- , ;:i;:' Excepllhat part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter uf Section 35, Township .(32, Range 25 described as followS:- 0~~- - 'ii:,' Beginning allhe point of intersection of the southwesterly line ofV.S. Highway No. ~ 0. as the same is now laid out and constrocted, with thc south linc of the Southeast Quar- Of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 35, which point is 1060.70 feet West from the , ,DIIlheast comer ~ ;,aid Secllon 35; thrnce westerly 'afongsaid sout/llme ~ distan.:e ~ ';342.60 feet; thence to the right, deflection angle 86 degrees, 24 minutes, for a distance of JD:7ii feet, more or less, to the southwesterly line of said U.S. Highway No. 10; thence 'ilClUlheaslerly, northeasteriY and again southeasterlyalong the southwesterly line of said ,U.s, Highway No. 10 to the point of beginning. - ,,--------- Also known ~ part ~ Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision No. 28. nding Minnesota Stat- "y convey the tax-for- 1m 2 under the remain. ----- ement interests would rc-Iocu~- !'/ley ~eneral and must p~ ~pac~ purposes. ,rse alterations that af- :dlowed beyond those (' wetland characteris- ; 'Jrt: ioculed in Anoka ---- ,fthe NurtheastQuar- . Anoka County, Min- cing described as 1'01- Section 35, Township Id Govemment Lot 2; ~ne having a bearing -f creek; thellce North nce North 67 degrees 117.,; degrees 56 mine ~'f!rces 39 minutes 5S -l minutes 35 seconds >',_. ':2' 50 seconds West a.AL 'Iefly shore line ofthc:' Ie and there termlnai:' 'Ioka County, Minne- " ---~~.? ,\noka County, Min~ ';,> tbc south line of Lot: , ,!TIne of said ((jill,' , -----.---.:.:-., '..~;~~~ ,jJitur's SubdivisioD-~>':~Y' : office ~ the Anolai ,it f Government Lot 2, -? 'g southerly of3ITiiO ,I; , follows: - -:;: .';;, h'out, New language is indicated by underline. deletions by strikeeut. Ch,319 LAWS of MINNESOTA for llJ96 202 (5) City of Lino Lakes (PIN No. 36-31-22-14-0(04), all that part of Government Lot 2-:5ection36, Township 31, Range 22, which lies northerly of the centerline of a cart- wayeasement two rods wide, the centerline of said cartway easement is described as fol- lows: Commencing at the northeast corner of Otter Lake Hills, thence North 89 degrees 08 minutes East along the north line of said Otter Lake Hills extended easterly, 1083.60 feet to the centerline ofTIald Eagle BllUlevard as traveled; thence South 24 degrees 28 mimrtes West, 418.80 feet; thence South 05 degrees 22 minutes East,395.65 feet on said centerline for point of beginning of said eartway; thence South 84 degrees 38 minutes West, 63.00 feet; thence South 35 degrees 38 minutes West:l8T'lJ4 feet; thence South 60 degrees 38 minutes West, 280JK) feet; thence North 59 degrees 22 minutes West, 350.00 feet; thence North 41 degrees 07 minutes West, 354.52 feet to the east line of said Otter Lake Hills and there terminating.----------- And all that part of said Government Lot 2 which lies northerly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Otter Lake Hills, thence North 89 degrees 08 minutes Eastalong the north line o[said Otter Lake Hills extended easterly, W33.60TeettotliC'centerline omalo Eagle BOulevard as liavclcd; the.lce South 24 de. grees 28 minUtes West, 418.80 feet; thence South 05 degrees 22 minutes East, 395.65 feet on saidCenterline for point of beginning of line to be described; thence East and parallel with the north line of Government Lot 2 to the east section line of Section 36, Township 31, Range 22, and there terminating. ------- Excepting therefrom that part ofthe south 325.00 feet of the north 534.00 feet of said Government Lot 2 lying easterly of the westerly 675.00 feet thereof; subject to and to- gether with that cartway easemei1thereinbefore described and to Bald Eagle Boulevard, and other easements and reservations of record, ~ any. (6) City of Ramsey (PIN No. 25-32-25-34-0061), Outlot 0, Flintwood Hills 2nd Addition, AnOka County, Minnesota, according to the plat on file mthe office of the Ano. ka County Recorder. (7) City of Ramsey (PIN No. 21-32-25-43-0(34), the east 290.0U feet of the west 1168JKl feet ,)fthe south 33lUKl reet of the north 1705.00 feet ofthe SoutheasiQuarterof Section 21, '1bwnship 32, Range 25;-Anoka County, Minnesota. And the south 165.00 feet of the north 1540.00 feet of the east 105.00 feet of the west 1273.00 feet of said Southeast QUarter. Subject to road easement over the north33.00feet thereof. - (8) City of Oak Grove (PIN No. 32-33-24-41-0001), all that part of the Northeast Quarter of the50utheast Quarter of Section 32, Township 33, Range 24;-Anoka County, MinnesOta lying southerly of the centerline of Cedar Creek and lying easterly of the fo\. lowing described line: - -------- Commencing at the southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Q'.Iar1'~r; thence North 89 degrees 37 minutes:?) seconds West along the South line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter 299.44 feet to the'point o(!ieginnTngofsmd line; thence North 18 degrees 06 minutes 51 secor1JSWeStlo saidcenterline of Cedar Creek and there terminating. - - - - -- - - (9) City of Andover (PIN No. 29-32-24-42-0055), Outlot A, Brandon's Lakeview Estates, Anoka County, Minnesota, according to the plat on file in the office of the Anoka County Recorder. -------- New language is indicated by underline. deletions by strikeout.- 203 Sec. COUNTY. Subdi\ tions 92.45 . bordering pI of Minncs~.)l (b) Th,' ~ the city ~ (c) Th,' Subd. : county and! Lots :1 Mimic Sec.4.: (a) Not St. Loui.scol sale undertl --- (blThe (c) The TOWI1(\ ~~ the pu]; Sec. 5. (b) The (c) The S!2 plat (2) pial (d) The best be servo .. .'..... .' ~.; , ..... _ '--~'." ~.. '..,. . .,~",.. . j.' '._.' '-". .', - ".. _~.. ..,- .f'.,... - .-_' > -..-~~ - _, ".... .. ,:., _. .'. ~"'~ . _ ." '" .... " ;~'-.-. 'l.-~' '_" ,......',...; _~"'~ """ - ......-: ..~. '.... . ,,_ ~'J#- ;~ ...,' "1" . ~ -.. _ ~ ..... '1-;.- ,.....:--1....",. ~. .".~ "_~, -","" ~"'''''''. '_ Rl!gular Andover Park and Recreation Commission Meeting lvlinutes - January 15, 1998 Pagl!5 (Rl!view Adult Softball Tournament Application Form, Continued) il-Iotion by Blackstad, Seconded by Lindahl, to set the fees for "No Maintenance, $200 tournament fee and $150 per field." "With Maintenance, $500 tournament fee and $150 per field." Delete the note on the county Sheriff's Deputy. The first "Note", add the word "penalty" to the end of the sentence. Page 2 to be changed as previously discussed (see paragraphs above). l\llotion carried on a 6-Yes, I-Absent (O'Toole) vote. REVIEW ISSUES LIST Acting Chairperson Grabowski asked that the Issues ListincIude who is responsible for the item and what d,ue it is expected to be completed. Mr. Haas stated the Redwood Park issue is being handled by Jeff Johnson and should be completed in the spring. Commissioner Blackstad suggested the separation in the fence in Pine Hills be added to the list. That would have to be done in the spring but hopefully before the baseball season. Mr. Haas stated that will be done as part of the fencing work in the spring. Acting Chairperson Grabowski suggested the problem with the cracks in the Coon Creek trail and along Hanson Boulevard be added to the list. Mr. Haas stated the trails will be inspected at the end of the one-year warranty period. Any repairs will be completed before the warranty period ends. The Commission and Mr. Haas agreed to add to the list as items arise. BRANDON'S LAKE VIE W ESTATES OUTLOT A Mr. Haas reported Outlot A has gone tax forfeit, and the county is responsible for taking care of it. The DNR had special legislation designating that that parcel can never be developed to prevent too much development from occurring on the lake. He asked if the Park Commission is interested in purchasing the parcel for park property and potentially developing a picnic area. The Commission discussed whether another park is needed, the difficulties incurred when trjing to develop a park in an already developed neighborhood, and the liability issue if nothing is done with the lot. It was agreed not to purchase the outlot, that it should remain as government land in its natural state. F , Regular Andover Park and Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes - January 15, 1998 Page 6 CHAIRMAN'S REPORT Soccer field by City Hall- Mr. Haas stated Arbor Day has been scheduled for April 25, and they will need to ask the soccer associations not to use the field by City Hall on that day. The Commission had a concern with using that field before the sprinkler system is installed. It was suggested that the field not be used for at least two weeks once the system is installed to allow the field to settle. Benches at Andover Elementary - Commissioner Blackstad stated he talked to Tom Redman at the Anoka Hennepin School District, and he agreed to install benches if the City wants to build them. Acting Chairperson Grabowski stated he has already talked to the Parks Department, and they have said they vvi1I build the benches this spring. The Andover AtWetic Association has agreed to pay for the cost of the materials. Letter supporting Commissioner Grabowski - Commissioner LindaW presented a letter to be signed by the Commissioners in support of Commissioner Grabowski's reappointment. Snml'mobiles - Acting Chairperson Grabowski stated the Oak Bluffpark has been used as a race track by snowmobilers. Also the Coon Creek trail was down to bare tar this morning. He has seen the information clips shown on cable TV by Captain Andersohn and the City Administrator regarding the snowmobile regulations. He didn't think it is helping. CDBG funds - Mr. Haas reported he has asked for more funds from the CDBG funds for handicapped parking and accessibility to the parks. Some of those funds will be used for handicapped parking and accessibility to the field at Northwoods East park, Red Oaks West parking - Mr. Haas stated Staff is looking at the reconstruction of the parking lot in Red Oaks West park. Acting Chairperson Grabowski recalled the Commission decided that because the park is used primarily by the neighborhood residents, a parking lot was not necessary. The Commission agreed. Motion by Blackstad, Seconded by Barringer, to adjourn. Motion carried on a 6- Yes, I-Absent (O'Toole) vote. The meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. \~~:::~'~~:ZL Marcefla A. Peach, Recording Secretary " " .' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '\ .I DATE: February 3. 1998 AGENDA SECTION Staff, Committees, Commissions ITEM NO. q . Appoint Park and Recreation Commission Vacancy ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Todd Haas, ~ Parks Coordinator The City Council is requested to appoint an individual from the interviews held earlier this evening to fill the vacancy that is available on the Park and Recreation Commission, This appointment is a 3 year term and will expire December 31, 2000. "- ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION " "-) DATE: February 3. 1998 AGENDA SECTION Staff, Committees, Commissions ITEM NO. 10. Appoint Chair & Vice Chair! Park and Recreation Commission ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Todd Haas, /' Parks Coordinator The City Council is requested to appoint a Chairman and Vice Chair to represent the Park and Recreation Commission for a one year term, David O'Toole was Chairman and AI Grabowski was Vice Chair during 1997. As the City Council recalls, the reason for the rotation every year is to give individuals an opportunity to learn to run the meetings and be the commissions representative at other various meetings that they may be requested to attend. '\ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION . '1 , ) DATE: February 3. 1998 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Staff, Committee, Commission Planning ITEM NO. / / . Appoint Chairperson and Acting Chairperson David L. Carlberg Community Development Director The City Council is requested to appoint a chairperson and an acting chairperson for the Planning and Zoning Commission. The City Council, at their December 16, 1997 meeting, directed staff to contact the current chair (Randy Peek) and the acting chair (Jay Squires) to see if they would like to be reappointed to the positions, Mr, Peek indicated to the Planning and Zoning Commission, at their January 13, 1998 meeting, that he believed the chair should be rotated on an annual basis, He suggested those interested in serving as chair contact staff. In the event no one contacted staff, he indicated that he would be willing to serve as chairperson for another year at the discretion of the Council. To date, no Commissioners have requested to be appointed as chairperson, Attached is a list of the Commissioners for Council review and consideration. The Council will need to appoint a chairperson and an acting chairperson. " i ': j CHAIRMAN , Randal Peek 13405 Uplander Street NW Andover, MN 55304 H-755-5249 Term Expires 12131/98 COMMISSIONERS Lynette Barry 14436 Xeon St. NW Andover, MN 55304 H-434.5318 Term Expires 12/31198 Lorna Wells 3348. 168th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 H-753-3383 Term Expires 12/31198 Jay Squires (Acting Chair) 1425 - 137th Lane NW Andover, MN 55304 H-755-1527 Term Expires 12/3112000 Jeffrey R. Luedtke 16932 Jivaro St. NW Andover, MN 55304 H-421-3385 Term Expires 12/31199 Mike Gamache 2815 - 134th Ave. NW Andover, MN 55304 H-757-6060 Term Expires 12/31/99 Maynard Apel 1781-157thLaneNW Andover, MN 55304 H-434-7805 Term Expires 12/31/2000 SECRETARY: Marcie Peach 15830 University Avenue NW Andover, MN 55304 H-434-9358 Revised 1/5/98 '. pzcomm - BH / P....tol.c..- (~f PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (3 year tenus) PACKETS: LORNA WELLS MAYNARD APEL JAY SQUIRES LYNETTE BARRY JEFFREY LUEDTKE RANDAL PEEK MIKE GAMACHE MARCIE PEACH STAFF DO NOT REMOVE AGENDA ONLY: SCOTT ERICKSON TODD HAAS DAVE ALMGREN RICHARD FURSMAN VICTORIA VOLK JACK MCKELVEY RECEPTIONIST CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 3, 1998 AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning ITEM NO. Acknowledge Expiration of ASUP Bulk Storage of Propane 13727 Hanson Blvd NW Super America I~, John Hinzman, :1""'" City Planner ReQuest The City Council is asked to acknowledge expiration of an amended special use permit in accordance with the sunset clause provision for bulk storage of liquid fuels (propane) at Super America, 13727 Hanson Boulevard NW. Backg:round Amended Special Use Permit (AS UP) 96-16 for storage of bulk liquid fuels was granted on November 6, 1996. Super America has informed staff that it will not proceed with a planned 1,000 gallon liquid propane tank at the aforementioned location, The sunset clause of Ordinance 8, Section 5,03(d) requires that: "If the City Council determines that no significant progress has been made in the first twelve (12) months after the approval of the special use permit, the permit will be null and void." Attachments. . Resolution acknowledging expiry. . Original resolution for approval - 11 \6\96, \ " ; CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES, NO. R -98 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RES. NO, R242-96 ACKNOWLEDGING EXPIRATION OF THE AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT OF SUPER AMERICA, INC, FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A 1,000 GALLON PROPANE TANK PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 4,26 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13727 HANSON BOULEVARD NW (PIN 35-32-24-23-0005), WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Andover approved Res. No. 242-96, on November 6, 1996, granting an amended special use permit (ASUP 96-16) for the installation ofa 1,000 gallon liquid propane for Super America, Inc. at 13727 Hanson Boulevard NW, legally described as follows: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 35, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south of the north 600,00 feet as measured at right angles to the north line thereof and lying west of the east 778,00 feet as measured at right angles to the east line thereof, except the west 150.00 feet thereof, also except roads; Subject to easements of record, WHEREAS, Ordinance 8, Section 5.03(d) states that "if the City Council determines that no significant progress has been made in the first twelve (12) months after the approval of the special use permit, the permit will be null and void."; and WHEREAS, Super America, Inc. has stated it will not install said propane tanks at said location. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby acknowledges expiration of said amended special use permit and considers the permit null and void, Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this3rd day ofFebruarv. 1998. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J,E. McKelvey, Mayor \. i Victoria V olk, City Clerk '1 / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R242-96 A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF SUPER AMERICA, INCORPORATED TO ALLOW FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A 1,000 GALLON PROPANE TANK FOR THE BULK STORAGE OF LIQUID FUELS PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 4.26 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13727 HANSON BOULEVARD. WHEREAS, Super America, Incorporated has requested an Amended Special Use Permit to allow for the installation of a 1,000 gallon propane tank for the bulk storage ofliquid fuels pursuant to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.26 on property located at 13727 Hanson Boulevard NW, legally described as follows: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 35, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south of the north 600.00 feet as measured at right angles to the north line thereof and lying west of the east 778.00 feet as measured at right angles to the east line thereof, except the west 150,00 feet thereof. also except roads; Subject to easements of record, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No, 8, Section 4.26; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission fmds the request would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the City of Andover; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no opposition to the request; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Amended Special Use Permit as requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the Amended Special Use Permit on said property with the following conditions: ,. 1) That the applicant shall provide to the City, in writing, proof that the tanks meet all State and Federal requirements and installation regulations. \ \ / Page Two Amended SUP - Storage of Bulk Liquid Fuels Super America, Inc. November 6, 1996 2) That the Andover Fire Marshall inspect the tanks and their installation, 3) That the Amended Special Use Permit be subject to the sunset clause as stipulated in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 (d). 4) That the Amended Special Use Permit shall be subject to annual review. 5) That operation of the liquid propane tank be limited to only properly trained individuals. 6) That loose or piled combustibles, materials and weeds not be stored within ten (10') of the tank. 7) That a parking space be designated by signage and pavement markings "for propane tank use only" within 90 days of installation, weather permitting. 8) That the applicant work with City staff to situate the tank so as not to conflict with heavily traversed areas of the parking lot. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this.Qili day of November, 1996. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: 7 , r )/k~ , ,E. McKelvey, Mayor L~I tf?b Victoria V olk, City Clerk '\ ) '- , J CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Februarv 3.1998 AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning ITEM NO. /3. Acknowledge Expiration of ASUP Automotive Detailing 13476 Hanson Blvd NW Russell Shoberg John Hinzman, 1 \f City Planner Request The City Council is to acknowledge expiration of an amended special use permit in accordance with the sunset clause provision for an automotive detailing operation at Andover Wheel and Frame, 13476 Hanson Boulevard NW by Russell Shoberg, Backe:round Amended Special Use Permit (ASUP) 96-25 was granted on January 7, 1997. Staff has been unable to make contact with the applicant and has been informed by the owners of Andover Wheel and Frame, that Mr. Shoberg does not intend to operate at that location, The sunset clause of Ordinance 8, Section 5.03(d) requires that: "If the City Council determines that no significant progress has been made in the first twelve (12) months after the approval of the special use permit, the permit will be null and void," Attachments. . Resolution acknowledging expiry. . Original resolution for approval- 1\7\97, ) , / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES, NO, R -98 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RES. NO. R003-97 ACKNOWLEDGING EXPIRATION OF THE AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT OF RUSSELL SHOBERG TO CONDUCT AUTOMOBILE DETAILING PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO, 8, SECTION 7.03 ON PROPERTY OWNED BY JAMES K RUNKE LOCATED AT 13476 HANSON BOULEVARD NW (PIN 34-32-24-44-0007). WHEREAS, The City Council ofthe City of Andover approved Res, No, 003-97, on January 7,1997, granting an amended special use permit (ASUP 96-25) to conduct automobile detailing on property owned by James K Runke for Russell Shoberg located at 13476 Hanson Boulevard NW, legally described as follows: The East 268 feet of Lot 12, WATTS GARDEN ACRES ADDITION, except road, subject to easements of record, WHEREAS, Ordinance 8, Section 5.03(d) states that "if the City Council determines that no significant progress has been made in the first twelve (12) months after the approval of the special use permit, the permit will be null and void."; and WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Andover has determined that no significant progress has been made in the first twelve (12) months after approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby acknowledges expiration of said amended special use permit and considers the permit null and void. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 3rd day ofFebruarv, 1998. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J,E. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk " / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO, R003-97 A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF RUSSELL SHOBERG TO CONDUCT AN AUTOMOBILE DETAILING FACILITY PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTIONS 5.03 AND 7,03 ON PROPERTY OWNED BY JAMES E. RUNKE LOCATED AT 13476 HANSON BOULEVARD NW (PIN 34-32-24-44-0007), WHEREAS, Russell Shoberg has requested an Amended Special Use Permit to conduct an automobile detailing facility pursuant to Ordinance No, 8, Sections 5,03 and 7.03 on property owned by James E. Runke located at 13476 Hanson Blvd. NW, legally described as the following: 3'1-- '3"J.. - 'd..'-j - 4'1 - 0007 1"- The East 268 feet of Lot 12, WATTS GARDEN ACRES ADDITION, except road, subject to easements of record. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No, 8, Section 5.03 and 7.03; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the City of Andover; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no opposition to the request; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Amended Special Use Permit as requested, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the Amended Special Use Permit on said property with the following conditions: I) That the Special Use Permit be subject to a sunset clause as defined in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(d). . \ Page Two '/ ASUP 96-25, Russell Shoberg 13476 Hanson Blvd. NW January 7, 1997 2) That the Special Use Permit be subject to annual review and site inspection by City Staff. 3) That the applicant secure a Hazardous Waste Generator's License as required from Anoka County and provide the City proof of such license. 4) That the site be subject to meeting the requirements of Ordinance No.8, Section 8.08, Parking, 5) That the building shall be inspected by the City Building Official and the Fire Marshal for code compliance. 6) That the hours of operation shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., and Saturday, 9 a,m. to I p,m. 7) At the end of each business day all vehicles under repair shall be kept either inside the building or parked in a fenced in area of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 11h day of January, 1997. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: r (' " W1 ii' /J '-/': , '.'v f( i/-N-~;? !fE. McKelvey, Mayor': !L t:.,,-, /.li:'/ Victoria V olk, City Clerk l CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 3.1998 AGENDA SECTION Non-discussion ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Finance ua0\ Jean D. McGann lITEM NO. I If-. Approve MIS contract with City of Champlin REQUEST: The Andover City Council is requested to approve a contract with the City of Champlin for MIS services, BACKGROUND: On January 20, 1998, Richard Fursman and I met with representatives from the City of Champlin to discuss the possibilities of sharing an individual to service our various computer networks, This individual would be responsible for daily computer operations, setting up new computers, maintaining Novell and Windows NT networks, assisting and training computer users, assisting in the installation of new computer systems, maintaining telephone system and recommending and implementing new technology. These functions are currently being performed by me and a consultant basis, The City purchases blocks of hours for services and when the block is used up, another is purchased, By sharing an individual with the City of Champlin, the City of Andover would not only be doubling the amount of service it receives but staying within the 1998 budget parameters. By implementing this contract, many hours spent by me on these duties will be reduced, The City of Andover would be contracting with the City of Champlin for a part time person. Therefore, the City of Andover would not be adding an additional employee to its' staff. This arrangement is similar to the one the City currently has for the GIS individual. The 1998 contract would run from approximately April I until December 31 with a cost not to exceed $21,300, The City currently has $22,258 budgeted for this purpose in 1998. J I CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \ .) DATE: February 3. 1998 ITEM NO. /5", Approve Change Orders/96-15/Public Works Expansion ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Scott Erickson~l Engineering AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item The City Council is request to approve the following Change Orders for Project 96-15, Public Works Expansion. o Change Order #1 - Gateway/ACG, Inc. o Change Order #1 - Grazzini Brothers These items will be funded from the contingency within the project budget. Attached are the change orders for your review, " ) '\ ,~ CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER #~ TO PROJECT NO, 96-15. PUBLIC WORKS EXPANSION. WHEREAS, the City of Andover has a contract for Project No. 96-15 with Gatewav/ACG. Inc, of St. Paul. MN , NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to hereby approve the change order to Project No, 96-15, MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a reqular meeting this 3rd day of February, 19...IDL, with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J,E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk '- / \ CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA / RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER #-1.. TO PROJECT NO. 96-15. PUBLIC WORKS EXPANSION. WHEREAS, the City of Andover has a contract for Project No, 96-15 with Grazzini Brothers of Bloominqton, MN, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to hereby approve the change order to Project No, 96-15, MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a reqular meeting this 3rd day of Februarv, 19 98 , with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk . / JAN-23-9a FRI 02:01 PM ADOLF SON PETERSON FAX NO, 6125252334 p, 02 - City of Andover 1685 Crossto'\\-n Blvd Andovcr. MN ':;':;304 Phone: 612-755-5100 Fax: 612.755-8923 CHANGE ORDER No. 00001 , ',-~ITLE: Replacement Panel PROJECT: Andover Public Works Building TO: Gateway/ ACG, Ine, 889 Pierce Butler Rd, St. Paul, MN 55104 DATE: 1/16/98 JOB: 4106 CONfRACT NO: 1 A'ITN: Kevin Swanson HE: To; From: Number: DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE Iliiifu'" "'D~;,r;ripri~ji...""",.,,; ~".:"""',...,:.';:.~i"'Sflkk#:~\.":"'i',.;<.";:;,'()iili#ttff.,.i.;;.tTriit~1;;::;;";;:~i:iirif'14ice'!1<.iifi~;'TiX'AmoiiDt:'>.;'N~,~1noo1it1 00001 ProWlcOll"(l)repl=tpmic 1.000 Lot $75.(10 0,0004 $0.00 $1S,(IO pwhpad Unit Cost: Unit Tax: Lump S.m: Lump Tax: Total: 575.00 $0.00 SO.OO ~.OO $75.00 The OrieinaJ Contrad Sum wu .._-.............._....._..,,,.,"..,........__.........~....,.___.H.... Net Change by Previously Authorhed Requests and Changes ..__,__..__.._ The Contrllct Sum Prior to This Change Order WlU ._ The Conh'act SlIIn Will be Increased ........_..."'...._",..................'.....~f_.._,............ The New Contra~t Smn Lleluding This Change Order The Contract Time W.II Not Be C'banaed ..."'..........'......nl"..III.I.'"'..............I".._~_................., The Date of Subst/liltial Completion as of this Change Order Therefol'C is $14,036.00 $0.00 $14,036.00 575.00 $14,111.00 ACCEPTED: Gateway/ACG, IDe. By: City or Andover By: AdolfSOQ & Peterson, Inc. Kevin Swanson By: Scott Erickson Tom Stone ~..e: .j _1Ioll* Date: Date: JAN-23-98 FRI 02:02 PM ADOLFSON PETERSON J!1rr g,-M II1U U (; ol! flJ1 GAIJ::WAY Aai INC. .. FAX NO, 6125252334 FAX NO, 6124885244 p, 03 P. 01 GATEWAY ACG, INC. 889 .J.>ierc:e BillieI' Route * 51. Palll, MN 55104 Pbone: (612) 48ll-OS74 Fax: (612) 488-5244 , ) CHANGE ORDER TO: AdoHson & Peterson 6701 West 23rd Stre~t Minneapolis. MN 55426 JOB #: G-480-97 DAlE: 1-14-98 JOBNAM6: Andover Public Works JOBLOCATtON: Andover, MN ......*........*.........................,......".................,...........*,.........,.. We hereby agree to make 111\:: change(s) s~ificd below: Provide (1) Replacem~nt panic push pad. Material & Tax: $75.00 Excludes Installation. Note: Thi~ ChllIlge Order becomes part orand in c:onfonnanee with the existing contraet. +...*.**..........*..**..**....*...~...*........................".......................... WE AGREE TO MA1)E THE CHANGE(S) SPECIFIED ABOVE AT rnrs PRlCE...........S 75.00 PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMOUNT..........,.............$ 14)036.00 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT,...................,......s 14,111.00 ACCEl'lED -The above prices and specifications ef lhis Change Order ate satisflCtory llnd are hereby ae.:epled. All work to b~ )"'ri'~ under ~ lemu and wnditions as specifi~.J in oriaUtal ~ntra~ W1I= othcrwIK slipulo./;..t.. , DATE ACCEf'lt:V: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: \ ) JAN-28-98 WED 04:13 PM ADOLFSON PETERSON City of Andover FAX NQ 6125252334 P. 02 168j Crosstown Blvd. . '\dove,. MN 55304 PhOlle: 612-755-5100 Fax: 612-75>892j CHANGE ORDER No. 00001 , I '-nUE: Tile Corridor tolD PROJECT: Andover- Public Works Building TO: Grazzini Brothers 1200 West 79th Street Bloomington,. MN 55420 DA TE: 1/28/98 JOB: 4106 CONTRACT NO: ATfN; Guido Gliori RE: To: Iii ON F lJ' NGF:"''''''''''''''''''c~"<''~'""""""",, ESCRIPTl 0 'C ;4, ",.",.."'w."..,, . . _,_,_."~..'...~-::,':~,,:..':..w,,.... :.:..:,....,.,.'.w. . From: Number: ,;'0\:ise':";#"~5: ":;:::;;''::,;;F,7;:i>~:':P::.ii:;~:;t':~X':e:;b",;;,,,j:;;;';~:;H';;';;,~;, ::;,;:.:;' 0'i,~:::,'?':;~';';":',::'~J This challse order is contin&cnt upon City Approval. IlteftJ""", I>escriDtioo". ';".":;,,,':',., "":::::';~?Li;>;;""':::'ooamf6i:;;":\Jm~'''';.,;::,'i'''i:i;tfiiti~r."rai~'Yt~"AJriOORt2.iiNtt'AriMlilMj Provi'~'('<7.mj<t;l.,t.of'OOlob 1.000 Lex $4,360,00 0.00% $0.00 $4.360.00 .:oniilor J 0 1 cMinuous inlo torridot 10lD Pcr_<4qurt" Unit Cost: Unit Tn: Lump Sum: Lump Tax: Total: $4,360.00 $0.00 $0.00 SO .00 $4,360.00 $15,920.00 $0,00 S15,920.oo S4,360.00 $20,280.00 The Ori2inal Contract Sum was ~__'_..~.............._......__.........._.._.._.......,_.._.._ Net Change by Pl'eviousJy Authorized Requests 4Dd ChllUgc3 _......,_....._................. The Contract Sum Prior to 1lli9 Change Order WlIS ......... The Contract SUDl Will be Increased ........._..._.______.._..._._..____...........-. The N@w Contract Sum Inclpding Thill Cban;e Order ..... The Contract Tune Will Not Be Changed ...",..__...._............___....._....._....._... The Date of Substantia! Completion as of thill Chan:e Order 1bereCore is ACCEPTED: Graxzini Brothers By: City of Andover By: Adolfson & PetersoQ~ Ine. \ OJ ) Guido ('..1iori By: Tom Stone Scott Erickson Date: Date: ~" CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \ '- j DATE: February 3. 1998 AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item ITEM NO. / t:, , Order Plans & Specs/98-3/Cracksealing ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Scott ~ricks.on,cl( Engineering The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement of the 1998 cracksealing, Project No. 98-3, in zone #4. See the attached map identifying the neighborhoods to be cracksealed. \ ) \ j CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 98-3 FOR THE CRACKSEALlNG IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, the City Council is cognizant of the need for the trail improvements; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council to order the improvement of Cracksealinq Improvements, Project 98-3; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the ....Q!y Enqineer to prepare the plans and specifications for such improvement project. MOTION seconded by Councilmember City Council at a reqular meeting this 3rd Councilmembers in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. and adopted by the day of February ,19.Jill.., with voting CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk '\ ) . \ , J ~~.LJI- ~-~ . \1. ~.~.~u . ~ .' ~ .. ~ ~ ~...L: . 0 ,.. ~ ..... _\. . . \ . '6 <(. . I ~ . J .f\, ''O'P.,...'....,. .. _~'. -~. r. '1."@"" . ~, . .. . l5f ;l J~.l ~ - -I: ~ I tIll '~ll r;;'[). -- .~ ~ ' : Ii.. :1: l ~:: -L'I I, ....' ,j',\" -~ -:: - !e <>' ~". I: -:1: " I; .>J ~'l~ V = == =.~~: ~51,li ':,111! ~.~ ~.~ ~.tl. hi ,~,.".u.. : l?" '/' ~':I: '/."> ",f:"f' 1'=<1....'.S ~:" . , ~~I"u",,,,, , y/' "'~j, L i ~ Z -'!>lh .!~+ ~d ' . ( .'.~. r:~~cl': 1 I . / '1'1': I. .,:: ~ ~ . ,'I~'\rl~ ' ',: ~' 1'..... J. '.".......... , '.J (:'.. ")--," >-, "11:.1] .~..j. .~I~'II.l.:; :;, ',~. ,~("';I..-. '" I~..._....... , I I If.' ~ f=, /' <o:<,.,.t::~ ,\., 'll (iO ','. ... "- ~'\:' . ~ t;,' i : . " ,~<>;:'. ,j ~ ....,\~ ;,J-'~ Ii ;'\ :~~~ 'I~'~ I ~I~;' "" '. .~ ,~'~~:~ : :'~ I~" /(H .:~: ~ ~;. -I '2~1'V'l . I. . ~ T~ . . ") j"I"" ." ~.' ",,' > f-._- f. j I~ '~. : '/ . i ~ " -~ ',~'~: ~ . i" I - i" :1- ''., ~' '..I"i .'I':'{~:~'~ ~ _1__ ~'I.l.:lo/h:;(~f.:>'t~~-~.~ ~ ~: '~.y,/~~ J I u I'U' .'1 [1 "/H(' ~'I I " I -----ll.-_ M': 1 "'.. j.._.... ,..{.. . .... ~ I. iIal I . , . . ' , . 'IV, . ..... - 11'.. 1'-' .[ ~ I ~ -- -. - I ~';.;' Iii I : 1[1 ._,_.~".. ~ .~ .~/ ~i I ::, .'. ~,~ II I " ~I:' - I i U -In:/ u -lfu'llr,..'1I !~ __. flAilS r M 1_ u ~\; lilT" - J~ ':~ : "'" ~ 'll.IP. :- ~ ',\... L I ',~ ~ I .............IT_ - .---.---;: "-..~. ";ii.' ....-...... """" '-=;:"c' i u::: '-cc li_~'" . , "1/ < l . ~- . ~ -},,;- - ~ "..~" ';..~ .... . ~ ~' ~ ~. 6,~lrlJ Jfi~!: .;~ 1.1 I ~t~11~ I, I ~. ;'~ I I I I I \ I ~ r- I "j' " ~ -t- . ~. 8r' ~ ---' ... 1.1 :1 I "'~ -\'-- i-J 'M-. ~c r, [j:/: -- :: I ..:" I ,i-' -. --------- :J "I /:1 - m - --i'.1..- ---1,'00' l I ... - 1 I ____ ' I .~ J~=~- '~" . I I ,.:- ,~ ~ .brn.. I 1 './/" ~~ , 1 ~Ll "~ ,r L __ _ i J _u/~~ i " , T ~.-:-:.~>; -- ~~i ] ) /J -:.; -T ';/1.'- r~'~~ i ~-c~~, "'[\1 :\'/'" ,'J "\ ..., I I""'" '~&~1~ J - - I ~.."I'" . "L '. ......~. , '. ~~. !-;.;:.::.::: -:;.' !!l ri' ::: -. . '~I' -N ft.:. . ,r'. - -. -. A'1' I ~ I~:'X !-; . / '., 1 -. .. -- '~i .~ ~~ )_., }-:. ~ I ...t~'" , , ! : .\y~. <<-. -:.... .. :r H I It" . 11 ~ . " ,,.,. . - ~T = >, '000' - Jt~ 'Y (( ~~ ) -.:-.-// . L .-...". - ___L ~ I JI ( ..J g. :! _.I 17 JU' -- -I rnrr- I TI '''.'_Ifll. " I . ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ " ~ ~ N o Z tr1 ~ :;j m "i CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION " DATE: February 3. 1998 '. j AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Approve Plans & Specs/98-3/Cracksealing /7, Scott EricksonJ L Engineering The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications for Project 98-3, cracksealing, \ J CITY OF ANDOVER '. ) COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES, NO, MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO, 98-3 ,FOR CRACKSEALlNG , WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. , adopted by the City Council on the 3rd day of February ,19 98, City Enqineer has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 98-3 for CracksealinQ , WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City Council for their review on the 3rd day of February ,19.Jill... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids to be opened at 10:00 AM, Thursdav, March 5 , 19JtLat the Andover City Hall. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a reQular meeting this 3rd day of February, 19 98 , with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J,E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk ; CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION r ) \ --.J DATE: February 3, 1998 AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Item ITEM NO. / :8'". Order Plans & Specs/98-4/Sealcoating ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Scott Erickson, ~l Engineering The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering the improvement of the sealcoating, Project No, 98-4, in zone #3. See the attached map which indicates the area to be sealcoated in 1998. '. " ) , ) CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES, NO, MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO, 98-4 FOR THE SEALCOATING IMPROVEMENTS, WHEREAS, the City Council is cognizant of the need for the trail improvements; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council to order the improvement of Sealcoatinq Improvements, Project 98-4; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the....Q!y EnQineer to prepare the plans and specifications for such improvement project. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a reqular meeting this 3rd day of February ,19.Jill.., with Councilmembers in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed, CITY OF ANDOVER voting ATTEST: J,E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk " , / ~ -:~ (~ i.~.\ ,l...,\'..\..:..:3' iP..~,: l: . CITI OF RAMSE'i", MIOKA CO; ~ ,-,,"\~I I / r.J. 'JI I -[)MITS TH T~~ Qoo..j ..-t' . "!fr:.3~~ .....r- 1 'I"~ -~. , ,J.J"I . .,;\:\.:'~",'f-:t,,:~, 1\ '~~~'" -';-r. .:.::;.c.. ,- -- -.... /" I ~ I .~- \. ~ ~! :- I - 1 I .1 L 1- ~oJ'~~c" . .;J.}': . ~: '/ ,1._ ' \. ~ ~ i;. (_I--T 11-_ ---- :111 ~~~ :rl 14000' ::. .', I,~ a, II -11 -... - .,- l_ . _ i: .~n-~IL- /"! i F=~n 11 L J~j / r; - - .i~ I I . ,. ~.___ K DD: ,- - J 11---:---- kJ i !~ ! ! ~ I ! j~! .. - ----~: ----i:. ~. ",';"~ ' .. ) I! 1 ~ !~ I ! I,:, ! I!~ I ! ~. r~r, <i I 'iiV! '+400' __. on_. _.--<c...., }' I ~ It, : l I. ~ tf/ ~~.I' I ~ -~: : Pi \') (to i'-' ! i!i:1::l ! r'l I I ~ ~ I <-~ ~ ,~~~,t.f-li ~' fl. ~~~. ~~: 'I, r '] '4000" ....-~, . .11, oj. aVI~ ".,. H'j~ ~Ir '" ~/ . ~ 'F '~;!6:t II.. d : V;..I : I ~.: . '. ~ d1:. ~s~:.' ': i ~' .:'~ IJJ.~1 ' JJ~ '~T' iljTJ~l1-2~~~,~~ :i,~~::,~,l~'~~ I,Ni~: :.~~I~~' o-l.L .) I ill..".~, ~::: ~ to ,.i)'X' ........ I . \ ! '~.. ~,\i:;2!." ,'" . .. ;:.!. .... . .'o'o u~'.:...:.....:.. ~'..'o ~fYY. -". III '/":'\<f~~~0.\t:Xl~~:: : I, < 1 ~ .': .~: f~. ,"~. ........ I \ \ ill . tGl !t:~~ i8-'~' ~ ~:. " .J. , : a:". .I~ --...... , I '"'" ~--/ ..~.- I: : Hi ill :": -:. 7i,i" \ j I, ' ' I I I ..._" . r f., ~~:= .i.. . . ',\:' ~ Ii r : 1/.\.'5- 13 -. 1" ' _ ,...- Q) " . rn . -;!.,'..~:>~ I: !; '}:i" : ~ml:~: f~'~*' ".' ',,\ ~ ~~~: ..,L ~ . ~ : I I' . ~~ \. "'.. ..~ "P. "'.....: ~- ~!'i\ I: ~. : ) .... ~ w1.'" ". .'. %. "i... :'" ".1 : f", %~ ",', ,<I- . . : ~ ~ .. .: ~ ~~; .' -1. .,).. ~ \9" 01 '... . .. - ...... , '.. ~~ TTlI~.'1..'-J.-1 . J)(.ll-r-- ....,- j~'. ':'1:' :: Ilt'p,l\ -\1 f :' ~$:t=r- =. ,;1f-:. ~ li-- : J ~:: -t:- 1 -... II' .I.f':'i'\ V.... ,~i~j!( - - :I~ .; ~.t* i IN.. ,-. I~t \ II / :.\ y~/.+' - -- . ~ :-.:5 ~'i' !I:-j ef','~ ~<:;,.. / f' . r~ r~ 'Ih" I _<r'. - - . '- " :1:, <:> . ' ~. ~ I ~ ~ ." :1: ,,,> , , ,. ~ " If; IIIVV: /~.~; -:'.i i.~~~; , ~..'I,I~.~' ~~~n '.~Lw '. '. . \ , '.~ . :: ~~ : [t.....".... ! J (:," 1~.~-.~ in" -6 ~. I .~',..~ '.'. 0,%..' -" , ~ -.~ . ,\ f_........ 1.-1 . ! < - / ~~.' ,.L~~J.g l~-I'~. ,. , . . 'tl~ :: ~~ '!:i/ -; .r.~, i~ ,~; w I I ~'R \\ ~ ' '/..' .'1 . I: . \\ ,1~ -:~: ~:---'.'. ' ,~), "': ,,~::, ~ ;;; I"" . .:..~l.~,' ~.' ,.1<. :~ ! : ';Y; ';l.~-': . ~= ~ ( ~ [f~"'. I ..' 'I(;J~ . "'0 "/. . _ .... .. g WI \ \U I . .1' ~J~ ~ I~ :~. .- ; ~~. ,'~; c.:. ~- ~ :1~~1~~ ~ \' ,: 1 I .--', .'", ". -or ~ .\{j' : ==- 'L?, ~~ . ~ J. 1 _ !'H' 1I1.lf . ~ _;\__> 'y 'D' '", _--..p-"", I . ) --.1. V cl\ N Q ~ fl'\ \>J , " I ._. ~~" I, :c~<~ I I r \ ) l!! ~ ~ ..~.,- ~ 'l~I1_" -....111.... ._"... _n... w..,....,... JTISI... IOIIIOn... ___n__ --II- ,.._"*111.... ~ __It.. ,.., __1011... ~ ~ ill l:l ..u n_ _It... -...,,- Il_AlIOIIIlII "-"".'OOt"... I'" () ~ Vi , CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '\ ) DATE: February 3. 1998 AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. /9. Approve Plans & Specs/98-4/Sealcoating Scott Erickson, & ~ Engineering The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications for Project 98-4, sealcoating, \ J CITY OF ANDOVER \ ) COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES, NO, MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 98-4 , FOR SEALCOATING . WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No, , adopted by the City Council on the 3rd day of February ,19 98, City Enqineer has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 98-4 for Sealcoatinq . WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City Council for their review on the 3rd day of February, 19.Jill... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as required by law, with such bids to be opened at 10:30 AM, Thursdav. March 5 , 19j!Lat the Andover City Hall. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a reqular meeting this 3rd day of February ,19 98 , with Councilmembers favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. voting in voting CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E, McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk " . j CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \ ) DATE: FebrualY 3, 1998 AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion/Consent Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. ~O, Approve Supplemental Feasibility Report! Shadowbrook 3rd Addition/97-44 Scott Erickson,d[ Engineering The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting feasibility study, waiving public hearing, ordering improvement and directing preparation of plans and specifications for the improvement of Project 97-44 for sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm sewer in the area of Shadowbrook 3rd Addition, \ J \ ) CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING SUPPLEMENTAL FEASIBILITY STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO, 97-44 FOR SANITARY SEWER. WATERMAIN. STREET AND STORM SEWER IN THE FOLLOWING AREA SHADOWBROOK 3RD ADDITION, WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 2nd day of December. 19 97 , order the preparation of a feasibility study for the improvement; and WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by TKDA and presented to the Council on the 3rd day of February, 19.Jill..; and WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a Public Hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and declares the improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of $ 638,911.39 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby receive the feasibility report with an estimated total cost of improvements of $ 638,911.39 waive the Public Hearing and order improvements, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the firm of TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such improvement project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby require the developer to escrow for the sum of $ 82.000.00 with such payments to be made prior to commencement of work on the plans and specifications MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a reqular meeting this 3rd day of February ,19.Jill.., with Councilmembers in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed, CITY OF ANDOVER voting ATTEST: '\ ) J,E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk \ I ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 3.1998 AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion Item ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning ITEM NO. ;;L/, Accept Withdrawal of Application Compo Plan Amend., RR to C Round Lk Blvd & 181 st Ave Rademacher Co. John Hinzman, '5 tf City Planner Request The City Council is asked to accept the withdrawal of a request by Rademacher Co, to amend the Comprehensive Land Use Plan from RR, Residential Rural to C, Commercial on 5,5 acres located on the southeast comer of Round Lake Boulevard NW and 181st Avenue NW, Attachment · Letter from Joe Nemo, Rademacher Companies dated January 28, 1998 '\ ..' JAN, -28' 98 (WED) 14 ;39 / January 28. 1998 if!~~, 'lite. 0272-74 BOONE AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN PARK. MINNESOTA 55428-2793 Phone 612.536-9600 . Fox 612.536.1198 Mr. David L. Carlberg COl1".munity Developmen Director City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulev Andover, MN 55304 Re: Pending Applicat' n to Amend Comprehensive Land Use Plan Dear Mr, Carlberg: We wish to notify you th t we have elected to withdraw our application to amend the Comprehensive Land Us Plan from Residential Rule to Commercial on the 5.5 acre parcel located on the south east orner of Round Lake Boulevard and lSlst Avenue NW. Sincerely, :-.. ~~// ' ~~~'':;?.1/ )'7' ~,....;~ p:JareprrM. N~mo. Jr:: i/ Senior Vice President & neral COWlsel JMN:sp " ) p, 002 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION , ,./ DATE: February J, 1998 ITEM NO. ;t ~ ' ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT City Clerk ~,~. AGENDA SECTION Non-Discussion Items Kennel Ucense Renewal/C. Nehrt The City Council is requested to approve the renewal of a kennel license for Cleo Nehrt, Hobnail Dalmatians, at 16326 Verdin Street NW Attached is a copy of the license renewal form, ,. ) " .I Name DOG KENNEL LICENSE RENEWAL AlE ff t\. 7 / & 3 ::<..(;, (/e /? D J /l/' N L<J l!Y1dOV-e~K Yin/ 7S-,3 c:0 c.f-o.6 /0 lJ-tJ 15 /t/ 1+) L- W A-A/71;q --r;;; /7/S tie 0 Address ,~~~CJI , Telephone Number Number of Dogs Kennel Name Type of Kennel: Commercial (any place where a person accepts dogs from the general public and where such animals are kept for the purpose of selling, boarding, breeding, training, or grooming) _ Private (any place where more than three dogs are kept for private enjoyment and not for monetary gain, provided such animals are owned by the owner or the lessee of the premises on which they are kept) ~ ************************************************************************ ************************************************************************ Fee: Renewal $25.00 Fee Paid: /.,..;; f ~99 .y8cx"lc? 7 Date Receipt Number Council Action: Approved Denied \ J 'pasnuo aAUl{ AUW S!l{l aOUa!UaAUOOU! AUll lO] A.uOS 'nOA Ol palaA!pp aq UllO Adoo U pUll IO I!; -L9L lU slIa1\\ q.rns: PlllUOO asuald 'ilu!laaw alp Ol lO!ld llodal al{l Ma!Aal Oll{S!M nOA]I 'ilu!laaW HOunoo ll{~!U Aupsanl al{llu arquHuAu aq II!M Aal{llnq 'AUPOl palaA!pp aq II!M lUl{l sla:ljoud I!ounoo alp l{l!M papnlou! lOU SUM OZ# Wal! lO] llodal Al!IN!sua] {llluawalddns al{l tt-L6fUO!l!PPV Pl( :ljOOlqMopUl{Sfl.Ioda~ Al!I!q!suad :a;)N:;nIad:;nI 8661 'O( A.renUllf :alva laaU!ilua Al!;) lfos:ljo!la llOOS It HOunO;) Al!;) '8 lOAUW :WO~d :Ol Wil<INVlIOW3:W H3^OONV JO All:) OO~S-SSL (us) . POf:SS 'v'.lOS3NNIV'l 'l:l3AOON'v' .'M'N Ol:l'v'A3ln08 NMO.lSSOl:l::l 9BS~ ~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 3. 1998 AGENDA SECTION ADD-ON ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Adopt Assessment RoII1/93-17/Crown Pointe Scott Erickson, ~~ Engineering The City Council is requested to approve the resolution adopting the assessment roll for the improvement of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer and street construction for Project 93- 17, Crown Pointe, The developer has waived the public hearing (see attached letter). ~ CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO, MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER. WATERMAIN. STORM SEWER AND STREETS FOR PROJECT 93-17. CROWN POINTE, WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvements, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA: 1, Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2, Such assessments shall be payable in semi-annual installments, together with principal and accrued interest, extending over a period of 10 years, The first of the installments to be payable on or before the 15th day of April 1998, and shall bear interest at the rate of _ percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution, 3. The owners of any property so assessed may at any time pay the whole of the assessment on such property with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a reqular meeting this 3rd day of February, 19.Jill.., with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed, CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk FEB-03-1998 10:27 ANDOVER SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 612 292 0083 P.02/06 PROJECT NAME 93-17 Crown Pointe FEASffilL11Y SWDY: Date 5-7-96 CONTRACT AWARD: Date 7-16-96 FINAT~CONTRACT COST Engineering: Aerial Mapping (1 % of street) Drainage Plan (0.03% of street/storm) Administration (3%) Assessing (I %) Invoice Bonding (0.5%) Legal & Easement Advertising City Costs Testing: Braun Intertec Sereo Labs Construction Interest (6.0%) $71,577.37 $1,395.65 $517.13 $11.875.49 $3,958.50 $1,979.25 $250,00 $313,92 $3.699.73 $5.708.77 $13,50 $8,184,31 PROJECT NO,: Amount $ Amount $ TOTAL EXPENSES (% Of Final,Contract Cost = 27.6554%) TOTAL CONDEMNATION COSTS TOTAL PROTECT COST Trunk Source and Storage: Watennain: Connection Charge "'Area Charge Lateral Charge Connection Charge "'''' Area Charge Lateral Charge Area Charge Sanitary Sewer: Storm Sewer. TOTAL TRUNK SOURCE AND STORAGE City Share: Sanitary Sewer and Watermain $~5.252,54+$2246,40)x 1.276554 Seal Coating 11.450 SY x $1.00/SY Subtotal TOTAL TO BE ASSESSED Current Assessment Per Lot: $575.711.93", $II,749.23/Lot (- 49 Lots Feasibility Repon $13.946,45/Lot '" 10,28 AC previously assessed under Project 92-2 $60.025,00 $13.243,60 $0.00 $14.210,00 ($6,201.63) $0.00 $0.00 + + = 428.370.00 420.621.25 $ 395,&49.68 $ 109.473.62 $ N/A s 505.323.30 ( 49 Units ( 11.72 Acres L-LF ( 49 Unit.~ ( (6,69) Acres L-LF ( Acres @ $ 1 225,00) @ $ 1.130,()() ) @$ ) @ $ 290,00) @ $ 927.(X)) @$ ) @$ ) +$ 81 276.97 .$ +$ $ $ 22338,34 11.450.00 70.388,63 575.711.93 b~.~.. RAFT 10676 Revised February 3. 1998 FEB-03-1998 10:27 612 292 0083 P,03/06 *~28.69 AC previously assessed under Project 92-2. The actual assessable area above the 100 year elevation for Project 93-17 is 22.0 AC. Project 93-17 shall be credited by 6,69 AC (22,0 AC - 28.69 AC) at the 1993 Sanitary Sewer Arearate of $927 per Acre. Construction Interest Crown Pointe City Project 93-17 City of Andover. Minnesota Commission No. 10676 Assessment Hearing Dale. January 21, 1997 $168.676.30 x 5/12 x 0.06 $110,416.60 x 4/12 x 0,06 $ 91.000.56 x 3.3/12 x 0.06 $25.756,11 x 2/12 x 0,06 Tolal $4,216.91 $2.208,33 $1.046.51 $257.56 $8.184,31 2 10676 Revised February 3.1998 FEB-03-1998 10:27 Assessment Roll Calculations 612 292 0083 P.04/06 Crown Pointc City Project 93-17 Andover, Minnesota Commission No, 10676 Lateral Benefit 1. Sanitary Sewer Final Construction Cost Expenses (21.6554%) Less City Share ($15,252.54 x 1.276554) $124,645.61 $34,471.24 - $19,470,69. $139,646.16 $139.646,16 49 Lots =- $2,849.92 A, City Share - 18" Sanitary Sewer 18" PVC in lieu of 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer 372 LF ;r; ($31.50 - $18.50) $4,836.00 B. City Share. Service Road Common Excavation - 485 CY @ $1.10/CY Class 5 Gravel- 429.8 TN @ $1.15fI'N Bituminous Wear Course - 78,86 TN @ $31.00fI'N 4" Bituminous Curb 610.0 LF @ $1.6SILF $82450 3,330,95 2,444,66 1.006.50 Total Construction Cost $7,606,61 The service road shall be split SO-50 between City Park benefit (the service road will eventually be used as part of the City's bike path system) and sanitary sewer benefit. The sanitary sewer benefit is both lateral benefit (to be paid by the developer) and trunk benefit (to be paid by the City). The City share for trunk benefit shall be prorated based on actual sanitary sewer construction costs. City Park Benefit - $7,606.61 .;. 2 = $3,803,30 City Trunk Sanitary Sewer Benefit $3,803,30 x ($31.50. $18.50).;. $31.50 '" 1.569,62 Total City Share. Service Road $5.372.92 C. City Share - Connect to existing Sanitary Sewer $4,900.00 - $1,000.00.. $3,900,00 D. City Share - 4' Diameter Manhole $1.110.00 x ($31.50. $18,50)';' $31.50.. $482,86 E. City Share - Extra Depth of 4' Diameter Manhole 1.2 l..F x $70.OOILF = $84,00 F. City Cost - Televising Sanitary Sewer 372 LF x $0.501LF x ($31.50 - $18.50) .;. $31.50 .. $76.76 3 10676 Revised February 3, 1998 FEB-03-1998 10:28 G. Remove Cone Section and Instal12' Barrell Section 1.0 LS x $500.00ILS '" Total City Share - Sanitary Sewer 2. Watermain Final Construction Cost Expenses (27,6554%) Less City Share ($2,246.40 x 1.276554) $123,291.00 49 Lots = $2,516.14 3. City Share - 8" watcnnain acrOss Burlington Northern Easement 156.0 LF x 14.401LF- Storm Sewer Final COnstruction Cost Expenses (27,6554%) $41,886.29 49 Lots '" $854.82 4. Streets Final Construction Cost Expenses (27,6554%) Seal Coating $189,611.71 49 Lots '" $3,869.63ILot 4 612 292 0083 P.05/06 $500,00 $15.252.54 $98.827.50 $27,331.14 - $2.867.64 $123,291.00 $2,246.40 $32.812.00 $9,074,29 $41,886,29 $139.56457 $38597.14 $178,161.11 $11.450,00 $189,611.71 10676 Revised February 3,1998 FEB-03-1998 10:28 T!ltal Lateral Charge Sanitary Sewer Watennain Storm Sewer Streets $2,849,92 $2,516.14 $854.82 $3.869.63 $10,090,51 Tota] 'trunk Source and Storage 5, Watermron Connection Charge Area Charge 11.72 AC @ $1.130 OO/AC 49 Lots 6. Sanit1l1'y Sewer Connection Charge (6.69 AC) @ $92700/AC 49 Lots Total Trunk Source and Storage SUMMARY Sanitary Sewer Lateral Watcrmain Lateral Storm Sewer Lateral Streets Lateral Trunk Watcnnain Connection Trunk Watcnnain Area Trunk Sanitary Sewer Connection Trunk Sanitary Sewer Area Total Unit Charge 612 292 0083 P.06/06 $l,22S.00lLot $270.28/Lot $290.00lLot ($126.56)/Lot $1,658,72/Lot $2.849,92 $2.516.14 $854.82 $3,869,63 $1.225.00 $270.28 $290,00 ($126.56) $11,749.23 5 10676 Revised February 3. 1998 TOTAL P.06 , CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION " DATE: February 3. 1998 AGENDA SECTION ADD-ON ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Declare Costs/Order Assessment RolI/93-17/Crown Pointe Scott Erickson, ~l Engineering The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring cost and directing preparation of assessment roll for the improvement of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer and streets, for Project 93-17, Crown Pointe. . ( , CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO, MOTION by Council member to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER. WATERMAIN. STORM SEWER AND STREETS FOR PROJECT 93-17. CROWN POINTE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $395.849.68 ,and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ 109.473,62 & 11.450.00 and work previously done amount to $81,276,97 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $598.050.27 . NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ 22,338.34 the amount to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 575.711,93 , 2, Such assessments shall be payable in semi-annual installments, together with principal and accrued interest, extending over a period of 1Q years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the 15th day of April 1998, and shall bear interest at the rate of Q percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution, 3, The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 4, The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof, MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a reqular meeting this 3rd day of February, 19.Jill.., with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Council members voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed, CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J,E, McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk '" CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION , DATE: February 3, 1998 AGENDA SECTION ADD-ON ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Adopt Assessment RoII1/92-19/Weybridge 3rd Addition Scott Erickson, dJ~ Engineering The City Council is requested to approve the resolution adopting the assessment roll for the improvement of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer and street construction for Project 92- 19, Weybridge 3rd Addition, The developer has waived the public hearing (see attached letter), . CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES, NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER. WATERMAIN. STORM SEWER AND STREETS FOR PROJECT 92-19. WEYBRIDGE 3RD ADDITION. WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvements, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA: 1, Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2, Such assessments shall be payable in semi-annual installments, together with principal and accrued interest, extending over a period of 10 years, The first of the installments to be payable on or before the 15th day of April 1998, and shall bear interest at the rate of _ percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution, 3, The owners of any property so assessed may at any time pay the whole of the assessment on such property with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a reqular meeting this 3rd day of February, 19.Jill.., with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed, CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E, McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: February 3, 1998 AGENDA SECTION ADD-ON ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. Declare Costs/Order Assessment RoI1/92-19/Weybridge 3rd Addition Scott Erickson,~~ Engineering The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring cost and directing preparation of assessment roll for the improvement of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer and streets, for Project 92-19, Weybridge 3rd Addition. CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER. WATERMAIN. STORM SEWER AND STREETS FOR PROJECT 92-19. WEYBRIDGE 3RD ADDITION, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES: WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is $203.563,67 , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ 58.641.98 and work previously done amount to $147,097.31 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $ 409,302,96 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover, MN: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ 3,709,67 the amount to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 405,593.29 , 2. Such assessments shall be payable in semi-annual installments, together with principal and accrued interest, extending over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the 15th day of April 1998, and shall bear interest at the rate of Z percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3, The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection, 4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof, MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a reqular meeting this 3rd day of February, 19.Jill.., with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed, CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk FEB-03-1998 15:40 ANDOVER SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 612 292 0083 P.02/05 PROJECT NAME PROJECT NO.: 92.19 Wevbridl!e 3n1 Addition FEASIBILITY STUDY: Date 4-1-96 CONTRACT AWARD: Date 5-7-96 $ 203.563.67 FINAL CONTRACT COST Engineering: Aerial Mapping (1 % of street) Drainage Plan (0.3% of street/storm) Administration (3%) Assessing and Bonding Legal & Easement Advertising City Costs Testing: Braun Tntertec Sereo Labs Construction Interest ( 6,0%) Amount $ 232.343,80 AmountS 209,060.22 34.000.00 746,94 292.26 6,106,91 2.320,00 300,00 603,99 5,116.60 2,510.32 13.50 6,631.46 + $ $ $ 58,641.98 TOTAL CONDEMNATION COSTS TOTAL EXPENSES (% Of Final Contract Cost'" 28,8077% N/A TOTAL PROJECT COST Trunk Source and Storage: Watermain: Connection Charge Area Charge Lateral Charge Sanitary Sewer: Connection Charge Atea Charge Lateral Charge Storm Sewer: Area Charge TOTAL TRUNK SOURCE AND STORAGE City Share: $ x 12" Watennain VS. 8" Watcrmain 120 LF x ($24.00 x 1.288077) Subtotal TOTAL TO BE ASSESSED Current Assessment Per Lot: $ 405.593,29 52 Lots '" $7,799,87/Lot Feasibility Report $8,574,64/Lot + '" 262205.65 63.700.00 ( 52 ) Units @ $ 1,225.00 1 20.701.60 (18.32) Acres @ $ 1,130.001 <--LF @$ ) 15.080.00 ( 52 ) Units @$ 290.001 19,510,80 ( 18,32) Acres @ $ 1,065.oon <-LF @$ ) 28.104.91 ( 16,13) Acres @ $ ] ,742,40) +$ 147,097,31 -$ 3.709,67 $ 143.387,64 $ 405.593.29 Revised February 3, 1998 10258 FEB-03-1998 15:41 Construction Interest Weybridgc 3'd Addition City Project 92,19 City of Andover, Minnesota Commission No, 10258 Assessment Hearing Date. January 2],1997 $75,923.05 X 75H2 llO.O6 $69.448,89 X 6.5'12 II 0,06 $43,589.40 )(5,5112 X 0,06 $14,602,331\ 45/121\ 0.06 Total $2,847.11 $2,257.09 $1. J 98,71 $ 32&,55 $6.631.46 612 292 0083 P,03/05 2 Revised February 3, 199& 10258 FEB-03-199B 15:41 612 292 00B3 P.05/05 Total Lateral Charge Sanitary Sewer $1.130.17 Watermain $1,427,78 Storm Sewer $562,91 Streets $1,850.21 Total $4,971 JJ7 Trunk Source and Storage 5, Watermain Connection Charge $1,225.00lLot Area Charge 18,32 AC @ $1.l30.00fAC $398.11/Lot 52 Lots 6. Sanitary Sewer Connection Charge 290.00lLot Area Charge 18.32 AC @ $1.065.00fAC $375,21 Lot 52 Lots 7. Storm Sewer Area Charge $540.48/Lot )6,13AC@ S1.742.40fAC 52 Lots Total Trunk Source and Storage $2,828.80 SUMMARY Sanitary Sewer Lateral $],130.17 Watermain Lateral $1,427.78 Storm Sewer Lateral $562,91 Streets Lateral $1,850.21 Trunk. Watermain Connection $1,225,00 Trunk Watermain Area $398,ll Trunk Sanitary Sewer Connection $290,00 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Area $375.21 Trunk Storm Sewer Arca $ 540,48 Total Unit Charge $7,799,87 4 Revised February 3, 1998 10258 TOTAL P.05 FEB-03-1998 15:41 612 292 0083 P.04/05 Assessment Roll Calculations Weybridge 3111 Addition City Project 92-10 Andover, Minnesota Commission No, 10258 Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer Final Construction Cost $45.625,10 Expenses (28.8077%) $13.143,54 $58,768.64 $58.76!Ui4 - $1,130.17ILot 52 Lots 2, Watennain Final Construction Cost $60,520.00 Expenses (28.8077%) $17,434.42 Less City Share ($2,880,00 x 1.288077) -3,709,67 $74,244.75 $74.244,75", $1,427 .781Lot 52 Lots City Share - Watennain 12" DIP Watermain Pipe 120 LF x $24.00 $2,880.00 3. Stonn Sewer Final Construction Cost $22,725.00 Expenses (28.8077%) $6.546.66 $29,271.55 $29271.55 = $562.91/Lot 52 Lots 4, Streets Final Construction Cost $74,693.57 Expenses (28.8077%) $21.517,50 $96,211.07 ~96,211.07 = $1.850.21ILot 52 Lots 3 Revised February 3, 1998 10258 CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.w, . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION INTERVIEWS TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 3,1998 6: 15 PM - Sharon Waters 6:25 PM - Mark Lonsky 6:35 PM - AI Grabowski 6:45 PM - Nancy Giancola PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION INTERVIEW QUESTIONS NAME: 1, What is the single most important issue related to parks facing the City of Andover in the next 5 years? 2, The Park & Recreation Commission meets up to three times a month, Will this be a problem for your schedule? 3. In regard to parks, what is the City's biggest asset? Constraint? 4, Is there anything that would prevent you from making fair recommendations as a member of the Park & Recreation Commission? 5. What do you believe is currently lacking in the City's park system? CITY of ANDOVER ADVISORY COMMISSION APPLICATION .-', Name :~) ('IN ~ Lx Ja::tEv:::<; - , Address: .L-\ t-( ~ (p \ t(J I Sr-/ Home Phone: ((p I ~) J.-\ ~ - I to I <= Omc4nl LOu {YJu Work Phone: commission Preference: ~" Planning & Zoning Park & Recreation Economic Development Charter Commission Public Safety Committee Cable Comm. Equestrian Council Tree Commission Please state your reasons for requesting to be on the advisory commission checked above: Describe your education/experience which qualifies you to serve on this commissi~n: vS-.t try, n$)c~ (s - ' --S:>OJ:'\l}Q J ~ ~ ~ OlV..01() (Q' ^-) n..0~A 1 O.0JJ-.-J Cl. ~^-~) ~~L 0--\ (2.Q ~_u...o..::tu.c}1A C-l. n Describe your professional, civic or community activities which may be relevant to this commission: 'r'(\()I'(\Q-'(Srl C>v-.e.A.J \00' ~D~ I 1-1 ~ o-c\o '* '1'1)..,\-" , Q\" "" (YUJ.!\UI, C\ n (' n-n-d: '-'.0 . a Dated:~ ~$~~..9 )~ Signature Date: To: From: Subj: Monday, January 5, 1998 Andover Park Commissioner Search Sharon Waters Park Commissioner position Please allow me to introduce myself, I'm Sharon Waters, mother of three and long time resident of Andover. My family moved to Minnesota 1 5 years ago to help set up recycling in this state. I have seen the accomplishment of recent park revisions and the great need to press on. I feel exercise, sports with team emphasis and individual accomplishment, conservation and preservation are key. Our parks need the artistic creativity of Frank Lloyd Wright, the wellness of Bally's, the spirituality of being in an outdoor arena and able to worship one's God. Andover is a beautiful community, full of professional people needing the bond of exercise, relaxation and beauty. It needs a community awakening and involvement in creating new area's of family togetherness, exercise and the feeling of getting away.....if only for an hour. I have headed Corporations and know of it's stress on families. I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to use my skills of organization, keeping within budget, managing volunteerism, telemarketing the community for assistance of time and energy to create an even greater place to live. Sincerely, ~QI0 Sharon Waters (612) 422-1616 ~ SHARON R. WATERS 4726 1615t Lane, Andover, MN 55304, (612) 422-1616 OUALlFICATION SUMMARY * Twenty years experience in direct sales and sales management * Consistent Top Seller and Top Closer * Experienced Manager and Motivator * Goal Driven/Self Starter * Team Player PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS BIGELOW CARPET SALES REPRESENTATIVE-Stone Mountain Carpet, Crystal, MN * Assistant Store Manager * #1 Sales representative in all area satellite locations * #1 Closing ratio in all area satellite locations-in excess of 80% * Resolved customer disputes * Showroom design and merchandising FURNITURE SALES/BIG TICKET SALES-Montgomery Ward, Blaine, MN * Top 4% in regional sales territory * $30 million annual department * Negotiated prices with customers * Showroom design and merchandising * Resolved customer disputes and warranty questions GENERAL MANAGER-Swanson's Art Galleries, Ltd., San Francisco, CA * Largest series of contemporary art galleries on the west coast( 1 00 employees) * Supervised store managers in San Francisco(3), Carmel, and Sausalito * Worked with ad department on all graphic designs and art production * Final authority on price negotiations; ranging from $500 to $40,000 * Designed and promoted art showings for nationally known artists * Negotiated contracts with artists * Clients were affluent individuals world-wide CORPORATE OFFICER-Central California Federal Savings and Loan Assoc., Paradise, CA * Over $1 billion in Assets-leading area mortgage lender * Recommended loans to Board of Directors * Worked extensively with area developers EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL TRAINING Simpson College, San Francisco, CA-majoring in Psychology Numerous seminars on sales, sales management, and merchandising CITY of ANDOVER ADVISORY COMMISSION APPLICATION Name: in o...r \L- ~v i d L,f\~ k \./ . I Address:J3g93 Jlea.-f)'-U-:5.1. .uw Home Phone: ''3;;)'3-6f?7'o/ Work Phone: 5"37- $15"3 Y &..)<1 S-S/ Commission Preference: Planning & Zoning Park & Recreation ;>( Economic Development Charter Commission Public Safety Committee Cable Comm. Equestrian Council Tree Commission Please state your reasons for requestin~ t9 be on t~ adviso~y / ~ commission checked above: r L/~ /;" ///2:/o~ a/Jd! ~ ~~ i-o li~ ~~ ~ /" tzl:!.e{> \ 'V \ t- CL L() OIJ:\~ f'd . P I~ &'0("" ~ k:\ \jf'U\. C1-",d ;JJJI--s, n this I~ 1&v:S C~I7/o~e. of (!,'-!-7, of ~o~/;'scla.1e- Wo{"6 ~~f+' rf\.(Jl~ Ia.r--b ~~I: Describe your professional, c~v~c relevant to this commission: 0\ to he, ,,,\It'll.(....J _ r kcuJ-e- a.'o~lc..r ..~ -..r: Dated: j. Lf 95 ~~ S' natur CITY of ANDOVER ADVISORY COMMISSION APPLICATION Name: 4/ ~ ffLbOk)s/C ," /;;2i.P~ /c.j& +_0 Lc.-.J~ t../ 3 </- ) L, 3 (.. work Phone: LjJ :5 - .:2 S-t:::, '/ Address: Home Phone: Commission Preference: Planning & Zoning Park & Recreation k Economic Development Charter Commission Public Safety Committee Cable Comm. Equestrian Council Tree Commission Please state your reasons for r~questing to be 0;' the advisory commission checked above: LCe.~t'JfAiI-'t!"~ Describe your education/experie~Which commission: q '1p.c..r 5> ;S, 1,A.-/1 5e~ ~JO\..J ~lifies you to serve on this J.)-:',..e~fav-- -~dv~ Atle--/.(::, Describe your professional, civic ~community activities which may be relevant to this commission: U:vt' OAJ ('JlN.s-frUI!-../'~OAJ Pc-/( a--f!- S vA..JSAf'IUt!:.- C-07/?'x. f)ve-r-"3 ~~o..r> ,:<,0 4N/love-.-- j/~/( t ec.. Co,...,... ,0$ > ,acW . -e;t.er':~ce ~Pl b.e..r- . tt.~ Dated: JJ.../~h7 / / 12/20/97 Dear City Council; I would like to be considered for the current vacancy on the Park & Recreation Commission, Al Grabowski CITY of ANDOVER ADVISORY COMMISSION APPLICATION N 11 \'\ ~I C'"11 Cln CD i a Address: 142{o2 \{-ellnul?;~. V\ ~0 Home Phone: 434~ 7 54 fc Work Phone: :s 7 ~-51 (4- Name: Commission Preference: Planning & Zoning Park & Recreation >< Economic Development Charter Commission Public Safety Committee Cable Comm, Equestrian Council Tree Commission Please state your reasons for requesting to be on the advisory , I[ commission checked above: (J@' A-i, rf 0~ Wr fA V Ie...) (lnrf '-I-- V/ , I(Of(Q;.~-l{JncJ1'lir(ljYO~S na(LQ~ sr-2rr,r ftAtln-h'u.C Gn c( ---L ~ \-O&z ( \ d ! \ L12- +0 LZ5~ /0-t- I t1 '---f-/~ i r ' 6.LUR-lOf<N.hT. 'II\VO/Uur ;n '-~(+s ~r 11'l().t1.~( ~(tr;s ,~f hcu.1Q, ()-j~(rr&.eud \\Wltl, ~~t~n S u1u'cl--J' I J 'fl.h cf- ~'Of\.{ LCL rnQnc/ d if~er-eht i-o 1M {!LCl nee cC 7; d. i:p I () 11, 0. h ( ate tf ' Describe your ~rofess~on~l, ci~ic ~ co~munity ac 'vities whic~ ma be A:::~~':>," A:;:;;;' Cvbv~~>P~~,{~i:'~'(~~r~' Lb~n110r ) ,Udwda(l( ~w',lh U ITA CiJ\c..Uk.e. ~v lu{p +Or k:lcQCXLf 'Ei (ou.) ;/'\c..o~ ~ , jnuo(v('../lU'1 t Qt- {jrO-CL,W!U(!.11 ~/U(fC~ Dated:-1 {Idq~ CtIA~ '- DATE . City Council Minutes - January 20, 1998 . Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - January 13, 1998 . Park and Recreation Commission Minutes - January 15, 1998 . Zoning Ordinance Review Task Force Minutes - January 13, 1998 . Economic Development Authority Minutes - January 20, 1998 . Housing and Redevelopment Authority Minutes - January 20, 1998 . Ordinance No, 11 OA . 1997 Building Department Report . Schedule of Bills , , ~ . CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION, DATE February 3. 1998 AGENDA SECTION Approval of Claims ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Finance ~\)'r<"\ Jean D. McGann I ITEM NO. Schedule of Bills REQUEST: The Andover City Council is requested to approve total claims in the amount of $ 167.559.13. BACKGROUND: Claims totaling $ 80.241.90 disbursement edit list #1 dated 01-27-98 have been issued and released, Claims totaling $ 87.317.23 on disbursement edit list #2 dated 02-03-98 will be issued and released upon City Council approval. Date: 02-03-98 Approved By: . . - ~ "'''' . . . . . . "''' . . :>< . . 00. . . "'" . . g . . . E . 0 . . "u . . 0 . . 0 . . >ON . 0 . ,. . . ~ ~ . . Uo . CT . :;- . . . . "'''' . . ~o 00 . . ...... ~.. . . u o~ . . ..,.., . . '" . "" . . . . . . ,. .'" . . z c'" . . . . . . '" ," 0 . . >: .., . . . . . . '" . . '" . . '" ~ . (II aI (DC>>" " 0.'" . . "' .., . . '" . O"lO"lO'\CI\it ~ . . " . . . . u .... . .......,.............. m .'" .... . . ~ a, ," . . --. '" "' . t"- t"'- t' C""". ... . . N 'tl ... . . --. .... 0 . <'\INN"'''' .... "''''''' Oz . . 0 E-"q-d..nO::::':: '" . . . ZZZUU " .... . ......,............... tz:ltz:ltzJtz:lM , . . :E:E:E:X::X: . 'tl . . rdOOrz:lUU " . . .-1.-4........... ,.; "''''''' C .c . . !5!Hl~~ ," u . . z " '" . 0000... '" allXlalOO .. . . >: ,. "'''''''H . . >: &1 ~~~ E . . . . . . 0 """ " . . u >: 0 . . . . . . >: COCOCO(llG) .. . . 0 0'10'\0\0\0\ . . u .................................... . . . m t"-l"1-0N . >: . . '" ~ NNNNN ," .... '" . . ... ............................ 0.0 "M . . N .............-l.... 0 "'0 . . .... " 00000 ..u >0 . . C 0 . "'N . . 0 M"",l.t'II"-CO C m M . . ," CJ\<1\0\0\0'l 0 '" .., . . " ..,......,..,...,. ," "--. <0 . . U I I I I I " .... ~.... . . . .. " (D(IICD(D(Il U CN U . . .... " ~ CJ\O\O\O\O\ , C--. :lm . . . 0 , O'Ia'\CI\O\a\ " ..... . . '" '" " .........-t.....-t "",0 Z", . . " .., r--r--r--ON . ~--- . . " ~ NNNNN C IJ' ..'" . . " 15 .............-4.... ~,Q.., N . . 0 00000 0 u--. . . a, '" oooxx C.., "'.... . . . " , ",0 . . . . . . '" '" "'~ "' 1; " ~"' ~ "0. o ~~ ~ ~ Uo ::- '" o .. '" '" " . ~ ~ ,~ en '" o . ~ ~ .., . -" u '" '" "' .... "'0 '" .. "''' M '" .. "0 ~~ U ~.. "'~ ~.... ..~ " U.... "'~ eno "' '" ~ '" " ~ 0. .... .. .. o 0. "' U ~ o ~ ~ '" ~ .. '" U .. ['5 o ,U U .. .. " ['5 .. "' ~ '" .. ['5 o u u .. .. ['5 o ~ '" o ~ .. 0. "'~ ~5 "'''' "' "''' o " '" "' > ~ o o o o M ~ .. "M 00 00 00 00 MM ~~ .... ~ ~ .... .... .... ~ ~ "" .... ~~ ~ ~ M M .. o M ~ ~ .. "... 00 .... 00 .... ~~ ~~ .... ~~ 00 ~~ ~ o ~ '" " o ~ .. .. '" .. '" ~ " "' '" .... '" "' '" " "'''' "'OJ UU ~ ~ >> "'''' ",OJ "'''' '" :i!:i!" DOt; titi" ....'" "''''0 ...." """ 00"' UU> . o o ~ ~ ~ 000 000 ~~o or-.. ~ ~ " '" '" ..'" "' "'''' U" ~.. "'~ '" ",en "'''' .. "" ".... ~.. ..'" ['5" 8 U .. ~ '" "' "'" ." u~.. ,,"'.. ~"'O ,:;1", "' '" .. .0 "'u", .."' "'".. ~ ". ~~~ 0.'" '" "' U .. .. o o o o M '" .. ~ .. ~ ~ ~ , .. .. r- .. ~ o .. o o " ~ .. ~ o ~ "' " "' ';' '" o en .. '" .. " ~ .... '" ~ .. 0. "' '" ~ o .. o ~ " " ..e1 a o 0.'" "'~ 0" uo. "' u'" ~ "''' tiiil "' "'"' "'''' '" ".. 8 '" ~ .. ~ o o o o M '" .. r-~ 00 00 00 00 MM "'''' .... o o '" ~ .. ~ '" ~ ~~ "''' MM r-r- ~ ~ r-~ r-~ o~ ~~ " M ~M .... "'OJ o ~ " o r- ~ M .. ~ o ~ ~~ MM ~~ 00 00 "" "" .... ~~ 00 ~~ '" "' ~ '" 0. 0. '" '" " " ~ "' 0. o '" ~ "''''0 "''''.. 6<5", ~~o "''''" "'''''' "''''"' 0.0.> . o ~ ~~o ~~~ ""'''' ..~~ ~~~ ~ " > '" o '" ~ ..en "'0 "'" ~o. ,,"' 0"' ..'" "'0 ~'" ~~ '" . "'''' ".. ~ . " "' :i! ~~ ~o "'u '" .~ "''''" "" , .."'''' ~:i!:i! "'uu ~~ "''''''' .."'''' ,.,"'''' "0.0. "' . . "''''''' .... .. . . " ~ '" '" .. .. o o o o M '" .. o r- .. o '" ~ M .. ~ o ~ u ~ " "' .. " ~ , '" .. '" " ~ '" .. "' "' '" .. '" M ~ ~ r- M '" .. '" " ~ '" .. ,"' 0."' 0'" 0.. u'" u'" ~'" "'''' ti~ ~~ "'''' ;:10 o ~ ~ o o o o M '" .. ~ .. r- ~ o ~ M o M ~ ~ .. M o ~ "' I '" " ~ o o .. ~ ~ ~ r- " '" " o "'~ u~ h "'"' "'" ~"' '" " "'" .." "0 ~en u o '" '" .. o ~ o o o '" '" ... N........................ ....................rt.... 0000000 0000000 0000000 MMMMMMM 0\0\ CTl 0'10'10\ 0\ ..,...,..,..,..,..,."" ~ .. ~ .. 0\.....................-1 ....NNMNNM \DOOOOOO COOOCOCO(D(IIlD 1.t'I.....................-l IDr"-t'-t'-t'-t"'-t"- ~ o ... o ... ~ ~ ... ~ o ~ 0........................ t"'-oooooo \I'INNNNNN 01.1'100000 \DN 0 """"0'1 0 O\....N...."""".-I ....,.,L.l'I\OO\O\M .,.""""..,""."...,. ....................N.... 0000000 .....-I........\D\O.... "' '" "' " '" o en .. '" tlJtlJU)tIltlltr.l c.:lrzJtLlt.:ltrJr:.:l HHHHHH ~~~...:l...:l...:l 0.0.0.0.0.0.. 0..0.0..0.0.0. 000000 E-<tIltlltlltlltr.ltll " OOOOtLlOOliiltzll>:J ::EtJuuuuu e;~~~~~~~ orr..r...rr..rz..rr..rr..E-4 00000000 "' .. ~~~~~~~i5 HlUc.:lr.Jt1lr.:lli:1Q ~fat;nJ~Sl~Ei3 OODDDDU> . .. " ~ .... '" ~ .. 0. "' '" o ... .. '" 0\ co M co..,.... t""-M O\\DoqiNt"-1.tlOr-- ro-..,.....OlDONM CO....llI....Mt"'NO'I ~ .. "' ~ '" " '" ~" .." ~ ~ .." "'"' "'0. ~~ 1::'" "' !l .. '" " ~:E:E::E:::E:::&:x 00888888 O::aJD:c:c:a:::a:::a::: 0. 2000000 Cz1HZZZZZZ ~tzzzzzz C&o...:lHHHHHH ~5c:ic:ic:ic:ic:ic:i DJ f-t E"'q... e-.q.-t E-< 00 .", I I ~ 0 f-q... E-< E-.q..q... "'~~~~~~~ 6h:i::i::i::i::i: "' '" ~ o en M ~ o o o M '" .. ~ " " ~ ~ ~ ~ " " o ~ ~ ~ ... " o r- ::- '" "' ~ '" 0. 0. '" '" .. " ~ .... '" ~ .. 0. '" '" ~ ~ " r- , ~ u~ ,,~ ~.. ~gj g> "'''' ..0 .. " "'.. 0'" .."' en '" "' '" o en ~ o o o o ~ ~ ... .. ~ M ~ ... o ~ o M o ~ " ~ ... ~ ~ ... '" "' u ~ 5; '" '" ~ o ~ '" '" '" .. o '" 0. M ~ '" M ~ '" "' ~u "'~ "'> "'''' ,,"' ~'" " ~:i! '" uo "'~ ..'" "'''' "'''' .... "0 ~'" 0. ~ en .. ~ o o o M '" ... ~ ~ o o o M ~ .. ~ ~ .. " ~ ~ o M ~ M ~ ~ M ~ " " o "' ~ ~ ... " o r- ::- '" "' ~ '" 0. 0. '" '" '" .. o "' u ~ '" '" ~ .. " ~ .. '" .... '" ~ .. 0. "' '" " o '" .. u o '" 0. ~ " o r- r- ,: r- ~ ... ~ ~ u ~ 5; '" '" ... o ~ u.. ~ "'''' tig ",0 "''' "' 0. ~~ .. '" "" 0>- ..'" '" " ~ '" en :i! " o ~ ~gj to"' "'.. 00 "'''' 0. " ~;. .. "'. " " ~ '" en O:N '" > '" ....'" .. 0 N ~ ~ N ~ ... '" '" ....'" .. 0 0 '" ~ ~~ ~ N 0 0 N N N N N N NN N ~ 0 " 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 ~'" H 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 ~ ,., 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 ..0. 0 ~ ~~ ~ ~ '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 H .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. 0 ... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...... ... ... >ON 0. " .... H'" .. Uo :;- 0: .. 0 0 ... 0. '" ,., '" 0 .. ~ .. ~ N ~ '" .. 0 " '" 0 '" .. 01 0 ... '" U ~O '" ~ ~ N ~ , H '" "'''' 0 .. '" , '" ... "'''' N ~ ... 0'" .... ~ ~ .. '" 0 '" "'''' 0 .. ~N 0 N '" ~ .. '" ~ 00 ... N ...... '" ~ ~ .. N .. .... NN , H '" ...... ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 .... N ~~ ... :E H < ,., U " ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 "'~ ~ .... N ~ 0 N N 0 ~ ~ ~ ON 0 N 0 N N ~ N N N N N ~ "'N N N .U U 0 ~~ 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 < '" 00 0 0 ~ '" '" '" N ~ 0 ... "'''' N 0 .. ~~ N ~ .... N .. N .. ... N ~ .... .. ... .. .. ...... N N ~ .. .. .. H .. N '" .... H .. ... HH ... N N ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...... ... ... 0 H .... '" H H H H ~ N NN H H N H ~ NN 0 00 0 0 0 ... 0 .. 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 .. .... ........ H H H ... .... ,., H '" H H ........ H '" > 0 :l! :;- 01 H> >0 . , " 0 " "', " " H " 01 >0 " 01 01" 01 , H 01 6 < " '" " H >'" H " ,~ H 0. 01 H 01 ,., , H ,., 01 10 ,., ,.,,., U ,., H 0. 0:'" 0. H 0. H H " " H 0. ,., 0. " " 00. 0. ,., .. 0. 00 01 >0 0 f< 0. 0. 0 01 01 100. 0 0. 0 0 ........ H " H 0 0. " H H <0 " 0. " "" ,., H t; 01 " 0 ,., ,., ,.,,, 0 . "" 0. ~ " " 01 0. 0. " 01 " H ~~~ 0. 0 ,; ,; U 0. 0. 0 U " 01 ",., 0 :E 0 ~ H 0 0 H "",., H " 'tl ~ ,,< " :E 01 " " .. " " ~ ""< .. " . H" , ," 0 0 " H H .. HH" .. H .<: " ~g >0>00 0 U 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~~g 0 ~ 0 0:0:" " ,., H " " 0: " " .... 00 H 0: < " .... .... ~ H H 0 ........ ~ .... ~ 0:0: ",,0: ~ '" H " 0: 0: ~ ~ 0. 0:0:0: 0: HO iii"O 1> " 01 H H " HHO H 8 <0 010 0 .. < < '" ~ <<0 01 < 0." iioiioiii 01 0 ,., 0 0. 0. " 01 01 0.0." " 0. U 0101 0. ~ 0 0: 01 '" '" 0. 0. 01"'''' '" 01 < 0:> HH> 0 U 0. 0: 0: 0 0 0 " 0:0:> 0 0: . . . " ....... ONN 0 0 ~ 0 ~ '" 0 N 0 N 0........ 0 .... ~ H~ ...."'~ '" 0 ~ 0 '" .. .... ~ 0 ... "'..... 0 '" 0 ...'" N....O '" 0 ... '" H '" N ... ... ... .."'''' H '" ::i HN .."'''' '" 0 N '" N N '" 0 ... '" .......... '" HN HN ~ '" '" N ~ '" ~H~ ~ " " " "" 0 " 0: !;; '" .; 0:0: U H 0: 01 " i!i ~ ~~ 0: .. 01 " 01 01 " "' 0: '" ,., U U H 0: ~ ~ 0 " "H H " H " 0 " """ "0 " H 01.. "''' iii" f< " >001 01 "' HOlOl <:1" uo 0 :E ".. 0:3: 0: "':E :E :E ~H H:E '" 0.0 ....H ~i!i '" 010 01 0. 0. H 0" :E 0: " HOl "'0 " '... "" " 0.01 H 01 0.01 01 t;~ "H 00: " UH Uo <H 0 00. 0 0: en>> 0:0 "... 01" '" ,Hi U:E .; "H 3:< " ,,< '" goo 8~ "0 010 ~~ 010: <01 H" 0 " 01 01 >0 .. " ,.,0. 01 01 0: " 0 'Ol ~ - ~ ~~~ '" "N 0 01 " >0'" >0" "0. '" ,0: 01" U" >0 "U U ~ H 3: 01 "" 1:15 '.. ,0 ~~ "H 0." U >001 " ,,< ~o " 00 "0: Ol< 01>0 uo ".. H'" ~~ " 0'" 0."" 010 00l 0. tJii: UH ..,., OlU r:;~ ,,0: " U 01 "H o.~~ 0:" 0'" HH OlH 0.. <.. 0. Ho. H'" 0':> ,;-~ 0" H:E <"" o.H 0"' U ::it') < ' 0: " " 0 ,.,0 ou "' ~" 0:01 U ~:l: .. ~'" 0: " . :E . ," 0: ' . " . " Ol> ..... >0 . . . "" "0 >00 ,,>0 0 ~gj "'>0 "'H ~1:: ~~ :E" :EO 0:>0 u>o>o H ~1:: ".. 01 0>0 >0"0 - .. "'" ".. 013: 0 01,., Ol.. ".... ~g; H.... 0:0 "'" 01'''' >0 . 00. H" 0: . Ol" o. ,.. "0 ~o ". 01. . >. .... 0 '" ,., 01 " " 0 " H 0: ~ 0 H N 0 0 " ~ " 0 ~ " ,., Ol 0: Ol " u.... " H 01 H ,., >0 :l "' ':> ~ 0: 01 0 " O:H 01 0: '" ,., ,., 0 0: >0 01 :E 01 Ol 100 > 10 U U U U U U U 0 0 0 01 .. .. "',., "' [; "' "'" ,., ..'" ..................-4....NNC"lNNN .. ~~~~~~~~~~MMMMMM~~~ ,.,,., ,., ,.,,., OOCOOOOOOOOo 0. 0000000000000000000 " Z eo. 0. co. 000000000000 0. 0000000000000000000 ;;]~ H co. 0. co. 000000000000 0. 0000000000000000000 '" co. 0. co. 000000000000 0. 0000000000000000000 '" "0, " ,.,,., ,., ,.,,., ~of""of"""""""""""'''''o:#' Ul ~~""""""....""""""""...""""""""."""""" 0 H .... .. .... a\ 0'\0\0\0'\ cnCl\cnO'l 0'\0\0\ .. 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ 0. .... .. .... ..;II """",.".".."of.,.<Qf.."..""" .. .."..,..."..".."..,...".."..".."..".."..".."..,...".."..".." ><'" 0, f< ... H'" .. 00. :> , '" .. 0. 0 .. 0, Ul '" " " 0. 0- 0. 0000000000000000000 "' .. '" O\M~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 "'.... a:!m(lQCOa:l<DNMNNNN .. ON~~~~~~~~OOOOOOOOO H .. "'.. NNNNNN..,..,..,..,...,..." Ul ~....oooooooo~~~~~~~~~ ~ '" .... NNNNNN\D\D\D\D\D\D .... aaN................................~~~~~~~~~ .. UlC COCOCOaJalalNNNNNN .. ""~\D\D\D\D\D\D\D\D\D\D\D\D\D\D\D\D\D ,., ,.,0. co o:lCXI aJ co aJ 0'1 0\0\ 0\0'\0'\ " 0000000000000000000 H " "'" LnI.l'tI.tlLlll.01.t'I1.I'IU'lU"lU'tU'lU'l Ul NNNNNNNNNNNC"IlNNNNNNN " H '" '" 0 f< ~ "'Ul '" "" 000000000000 0. ............................................................................ ,.,,., 0. "'''' .....................................-1........ " 0000000000000000000 0 .... .. "'''' NNNNNNNNNNNN '" NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . co. 0. eo. 000000000000 0. oooooooooo~oooooooo '" co. .. UlUl r--OMl.tlLnOr--OMLlIl.tlO 0. OON~OOOOMMNO~~~O~OO "'''' " .... .-IN~""CI'l""'.-IN""""CI'lI""l '" """"'CI'lCl'lO<d"N<d"l.tl<d"1""I N..-l..,."" I""ICI'lO",," .. "'''' '" .... l"'lI.tlCl'lO'lO'lMMlJ'ICI'lCl'lCl'lM '" NNI""II""INNI.tl.-lI""lI""lMLlI~CI'lCl'lMI""INN .... .. .... ..,..,..,.."..,..,..,..,...,..,.,...,. .. ..,..,...,..,..,..,...,..,..,..,..,..,..,..,..,...,...,..,..,. " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ " " " "'''' .-I.....-INN................NN..... " .....................................................................N................... co. 0. eo. 000000000000 0. 0000000000000000000 .. " " " ........ ..-t.....I.OI.Or--............\DIllr--..... " ...............................................................1.01.0.................. ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ <Il<ll ~~~~~~~~~~~~~oooooooooooo ~ "'OJ ~~H~HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH ,~ <Il HH ~~~~~~~~HHHHHHHHHHH "' "' "'''' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ U 0,0, tIltl1t11f1ltl1t1]CI)ClJtI)tI1t11t11 <Il ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ '" H 0,0, 0011100000000000000000000 "' ~~~~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 0 5: "" HHHHHHHHHHHH H tIltlltlltlltlltlltlltl1t1ltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltll <Il<ll H..:I...:l..:l..:l..:l..J..J..J..:I..:I..:l '" ~ "' 0.0..0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0. 0, 00000000000000000000000000000000000000 " <Il<ll <Il 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0. 0, UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU ~ "' i'ii'i~ !;!;~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~:a 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ '0 ~ ~ " ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . HHf< HHf< f< ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -" f<f<O ~~g OOO~~~OOOOOOo " 0000000000000000000 u o,o,f< t; ZZZZZZZZZZZZE-t Z <Il f< HH ...... ~~~~~~~~~H~~ H ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ "''''''' (;i "''''''' ~~~~~~~~~~~~g ~ 000 HHO 8 """ f< "''''" '" oooo~oooooooooo~oooo~~~~oo~~oo g)"'z Z o,o,z ~lZ10000~OOOO~OO~ooooz '" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 0", 0 "'"'OJ o.o.o.o.o.o.o.o.o.o.o.o.~ 0, '" <Il<ll:> 0 "'''':> 000000000000> 0 0000000000000000000 . . . f< UlUlC 0. ,.,..'" LIl\OLIlO....I""I..-IN1""'IOl7\l"-1""'I a> O....~....O~l"-Ml"-....N\01""'IM1""'I1""'ION~ ~ ...... '" 0..... a> ~~~~l7\l"-OOOO~O.... .. l"-LIlMLIl....\ON1""'IN....l"-LIlM~l"-1""'I1""'IM~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 ...... '" "a>.. ON01""'lO\O..-IM1""'INOl"-~ Ul 1""'ILIl~\ONO~""~N""\OM1""'INl"-l"-LIl~ ~ "",., .. ,.,"'Ul I""IM1""'IN1""'Il"-1""'IM1""'IN1""'It""N ,., '" ""'" " " "'" ,., oo~ooooooooo zzzzzzzzzzzz " 1-l1-l1-l~1-l1-l1-l1-l1-l1-l1-l1-l ~~~~~~~~~~~~ f< ..'" "'''' :<: "' H .... 8 z'" '" "" ~~~~~..::I..::I..::I..::I..::I..::I..::I <Il oz 0 .. .. uuuuuuuuuuuu '" t; HH >- 000000000000 f< " f<3: 0 .... 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "' '" "'" zzzzzzzzzzzz 0, c~~oo~~~~~~oooooooooooooooooooo f<.. [;j;;] "'Z OUlUl 1-l1-l1-l1-l1-l1-l1-l1-l~~I-lH <Il OI-lI-lI-lHI-lI-lI-l~I-l~I-lI-lI-l~HI-lI-lI-lI-l <IlC H z.... :'l:'l:'l:'l:'l~:'l:'l~:'l~:'l ~~~~~~~~..::I..::I..::I..::I..::I..::I..::I~..::I..::I..::I..::I >- .. Z " " "'''' H"" 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0. "'" 0 Z ' , "'0 .. .. OOOOOOCll~ 0000 00 ~ ;;; 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0. ,., H Hf<f< H>< ~~~..::I..::I..::I..::I..::I..::I..::I..::I..::I oo~~~~~~~~~oooooooooo '" .. f< "'0,0, f<U ti<ll<ll :> u~~~~~~~~m~~~m~~~~oo~ ,",0. 0, ",HH "' ",OJ cn~~~~~~~~~~::E::E H H" ",H "''''''' "'''' H:<::<: Cllo:::o:::o:::o:::o:::e::o::e::o:::o:::o:::o::: 0", ~oooo~M~~~~tzlMooootzltzltzltzltzlOOOO 0 ~ei zou f< "'00 uoooooooooooo z" ~uuuuuuuuuuouuuuouuu ;;]a> H<Il<ll "'"' ",f<f< 1-l~t..lZ.lZ.~lZ.lZ.lZ.lZ.rs..rs..rs.. HO 01-l1-l1-l1-l1-l1-l1-l~1-l~1-l1-l1-l~1-l1-l~1-l1-l Z<Il ~g)g) f<'" ~HH >1-l~I-lI-l~HI-lHI-lI-lI-lI-l <Il ~t..~rs..t..t..~~rs..rs..rs..rs..rs..rs..rs..rs..rs..rs..rs.. Z" "' <IlH 3:3: !g~~~~~~~~~~~ ,"' ~rs..rs..~~~rs..~rs..~~rs..~~~rs..~~rs..rs.. H'" "''' ",<Il<ll f<f< <Il<ll <Il'" 0000000000000000000 .... 0 "' " '" " "' <Il 0 '" "' 0... Z '" '" '" '" ~ Z "'" "' H H 0 .. "' ",0. :> .. .. .. " " "'.. .. l'i .. '<2''I!''<I''lI' ... ."" 0 ... "'''' .-IONM .. ... '" '" "''''''' 0000 0 00 ... ... 00 .-4.-1......-1 ... 0 ... ... ......... 0 Z 0000 0 00 0 0 00 0000 0 0 0 0 000 :i!" H 0000 0 00 0 0 00 0000 0 0 0 0 000 ~ ,., 0000 0 00 0 0 00 0000 0 0 0 0 000 ..'" 0 '<1'............ .. .... .. .. "'''' U"IU'1U'1U"1 '" '" '" .. "''''''' 0 H 0'\0'\a'l0'\ '" "'''' '" '" "'''' 0'I0\0\CJ'l '" '" '" '" "''''''' 0 ..""...."" .. .... .. .. .... ..,.""'0:1'.... .. .. .. .. ...... ,..'" '" E-< .... H'" .. Uo > .. '" 0 0 .. '" '" ,., 0 '" H 0000 .. 0: '" r--r--r--r-- "'''' '" "'''' U 0000 ..'" ... "'''' ... '" '" H U"IU'lU"IU'l '" 00 M "'''' '" .. 0 U"IU'lU'lU'I 0 00 M "'''' C:O....LlIU'l '" 0 ~ 1.01.0\01.0 .. "'''' ... "'''' od'U"IO'IO"I ... '" .. 0 UUU 0000 ... ...... '" "'''' ................ ... ... '" ...... H NNNN M ...... 0 ...r- MMMM .. 0 '" .., 000 '" H .. ,., U E-< 15 .-1..-1.-1.... '" .... ... '" ............"" 0 M ... ...... 0000 ... ...... 0 ... Nl"'4CO.... '" 0 '" "'.... e NNNN '" M M '" '" NNU"lN '" M '" M M M 0000 0 00 0 0 "'.. 0000 0 0 0 '" 000 .. OOMM M M'" M 0 00 OMMM '" '" '" '" 0"'" C\l""U'lo::I' .. .... .. .. r-r- ...."""""" '" '" '" ... "'...'" .. U'I............. '" "'''' ... '" ...... MO\CJ'IO"I ... '" '" '" "''''... """""""'" .. .... .. .. "'''' """"..,."'" .. .. .. M ...... 0 ... ... ... ... 15 ................ ... ...'" ...... .........-1.-1 ... '" ......... 0000 0 00 0 0 00 0000 0 0 0 0 000 .. ..............-1 '" "'''' ... '" ...... ....1.01.0\0 ... .. r- ... ......... ,.,'" ... '" '" ':' m tIltl)t')tI) '" '" ",., '" 0 Z ... tzlCzJt.111l .. .. ;;;';] , , .. '" ... 1-11-11-11-1 H ,.,'" H "'''' '" '" 'i' '" .~ o-1~...:I...:I '" ~~ '" ..,.. .... .. .. H " 0..0.0.0.. '" '" "'.. HH H H '" '" .. 0.0..0..0.. '" '" '" ,.,'" ,., ,., '" '" ~ .... ::J:J:>::J 0 0 .. "'''' '" '" .. '" Z Z 0 Cl]tI]tI]Cf.l '" .... tIl U" "'''' '" '" Z 0 tIl 0"0 ZZ ~U 00 0 0 H tIl tIl HUH . OOCzJtz1CzJ '" 00 '" tIltll tIl tIl 0 ;! tJ:i!tJ ... tJUUU H U ~~:1 ,.; fii ,.; 0 .. HI-lHH..J .. ~~:1 H ~e;CIJ~~ ~~~~ ." ~ l'ldkd~.r... 0< '" .. H"~"E-< Z Z U m r...r...r.z..r...E-l .. ....... .. ZtIlE-< H 0 H H ...:IE-1,,':U..' -" Z 00000 '" ......0 0 '" HZO ;!"'O"'O ;! Z ;! ~ 02000 U E-< tIltllE-< ~ HE-< r:a:I:r:.:l8 H t)HUE-+ tIl E-< ~~~~13 E-< ~ :1:1'" ......0::......0:: .... ... .... .. ..;!..'" 15 ~ "''''''' '" '" '" '" ,., '" '" ....0 H U 0 I-IC::C::C::O H 0 H ~ '" "'0 0 lIlC:.:lr:.::lCz:lQ 0:0:0 .. '" H"'O <t<Jto::IOOQ .. '" .. ::Jrz1::JC U ZZZZZ 0 "''''Z Z .. OZZ Cd.... ~...q.q:~ '" ~ '" .. ra..E-+er..Z U OOOOOOtz:lCzl ,.. 00'" '" 0 .."'.. rz:lt.:ltrJOOt.:l .. .. 0: OOHli::Jr.l .. l'l'ClO> 0: 00> 0 ::&:C~ P:~::&:::&:> '" '" E-< P::tIlo::> . . . . "'''' uu 0 0 O)U'INU"I E-< U'lf"-U"I1D1'""t '" 000 0 0 r-..... CONO'ICOM .. 0 15 U"If"oU'lM.... 0 "''''0 0 0 0...... r-f"'-NO\N .. 0 '" 0 ""CO<d4f"'- 0 M....MLIl.... '" 00... '" 0 M..r- oc:or-....t"- .. ... '" 0 OU'lMO'I ~ '" ... ......'" ... '" "'..r- N<1lO'lMC:O .. '" .. 0 C:O.-lr-lO '" .. ....M '" .... '" ... M N.-lNI.O '" "'..... i E-<E-< ~~r:J HH '" "'''' 00 ,.; '" "''''''' '" "'''' ~ "'''' "'''' U "''''''' '" H"'''' "'''' "'''' '" H "''''''' '" '" ...... ... '" UU ,..> '" tJ '" 3tH) Z '" :i!gJ '" "''''''' i Z '" '" E-<E-< 0 '" . 0 Cl 0 '" ::ltl) tIl tI1 tf.I ~oo '" '" z'" xoozz ... "'''' "'''' <<..co< '" Qr.Jc.JlIlCzJ ,.,'" '" ...'" HZ U>tzJU:J '" '" '" Z~ """ E-<" 01-11-11-11-1 "0 H ~~~~~ .. 0' H'" ~~~~ tIlO C::...:I..J...:i..:l E-< ,,..,.. 15 gj~ ~:1 ;;] u'" "'0 00 ,.. .. 15 ""0..0..0..0. O~ "'E-<E-< E-+a.>..c< tIl "'.. H'" C::OOO "'''' o..o..o..c. ZHH H E-<'" .. "'''' .... fii~ 1::", "'''' '" M H CzJO::JOO 0"'''' E-< 0 tIlHE-< I-4QCI1c:r:c:r: "'''' ..'" ,., :1,; E-< UCIltf.lCf.ltll UO HH '" "'''' ~fj~ U~E-<rdrd [i;;] "'0 ..'" 0 ......UUU '" H ,.. "'~~ H "'''' 00<>> "'''' "H '" .~ CI1C11 H'" "'H r~.cd CiI r:&:I CiI zo: !< '" E-<O 15"'0 tIlUOOO ....'" 00. '" "'''' ~QQQ U ~eJ to.UUUU 0 U .. ~ ... ... ... ... ..." "'''' HZ .., :i!.. 01-11-11-11-1 H' E-< . . 0'" ~. ~.;.; 0 ' . ~5 g . . . Z'" c..r..,r:r..c.. "',.. "',..,.. ;S~ ,.. )04)01)01)1 "'~ "',.. ~)oI )ol )01 Z'" '" ~r...~c...c... .. .... "'.. "''''.. ~c..r...r...c... "'.. .. H Zrz.rz.e:r.. H.... "'0 0000 "'. '" . . ~tIl Z' 0:.... ......... ... 0'" O' tIl" tIl'" 0'" ... ... ..'" 0 '" '" H ... ,.. ! '" '" '" 0 '" 0: 0: '" '" :1 '" '" '" 5! U.... " " '" '" l'i ~ " '" E-< 0 "'... '" '" 0 0 .. '" 0 Z 0 "0 > 0 0 0 0 '" 0: '" H .., .., "'''' '" i3 '" Mo:I'U'l\D " " .. .. '" '" 0 "'0" M .. .. NM of U'l\Df"o CO .-I..-t..-l.... .. .. .. .. .. .. '" "''''''' '" '" '" NNNNNNN " Z 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0000000 ~., H 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0000000 ~ ,., 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0000000 ..'" " ..,...,."""" .. '" '" .. .. '" .. "''''''' '" .. '" 0:1''''''''''''''''''''''''' 0 H C7\0'l0'la\ '" '" '" '" '" '" .. "''''''' '" .. .. 0'l0'la\0\0'I0"I0'\ 0 ..,..,...,."" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. .. .. ..,...,...,...,...,...,...,. "'''' '" .. ..... H'" .. Uo :;- '" '" 0 0 .. '" '" ,., " '" .. .. '" tl]Cf.lCf.lCl)tI]tI]tI] '" .. '" 0 ~~~~~~~ 0 , .. U '" '" .. '" .. fo.q..q...q...q-q...q.04 H '" M 0 M ....0 M .. tIltlltl]tIlC/101tI] ~ '" 0 '" '" " '" "''''''' 0 0 M M .. .. M .. "''''''' .. '" .. 00000000000000 .. 0 '" " '" .. "''''''' '" .. '" 00 00111 Ct1 tIlC.:Hd H '" '" .. '" .. .. "''''''' .. " .. tl)CI)tIltlltlltlltll >: H < tJ .. 13 ""''''''''''''' '" .. " .. .. .. 0 ...... M .. MMMMMMM .....-1.-1.... 0 '" '" '" '" '" .. 000 M '" ODCOC:OC:OCOCOC:O 0 \D\D\D1ll .. '" '" .. '" .. '" MMM .. '" MMMMf"'lMM lJ U 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 '" 0 0 OOOOOOU"l < 0000 0 '" 0 0 '" 0 0 "''''''' 0 M '" ""U'l\Dr-coocn 0000 '" .. .. M .. 0 '" "''''''' " .. ~ 0'\0'10'\0'\0'\'0::1'0'\ .. C"-r--r-r- '" .. '" '" '" '" '" "'..'" .. .. .. .-+.-l.-l.........O"Ir-I 'It''''''..,...,. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... '" .. .. ..,...,.""'''''''''..,.'''' 0 13 r--\Dt'0\ .. '" .. .. '" .. .. ....'" .. .. '" .....-Ir-l..........-I.... M""""'''''' 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 .."'''' 0 0 0 0000000 .. MMMM .. " .. .. " '" .. ...... .. .. " ....r-lr-l.....-lID.... > '" > ,., > . , '" , ~ , .. '" , '" " H 0000[1:100 '" '" '" "''''''' '" '" ,~ !5!5!5g; '" H '" H "''''''' < H "' '" ,., H ,., UUU '" ,., tl]tI]tIltl] U '" ,., '" " HHH " '" ... 0000 H '" '" '" '" ~~~ '" Z '" 0 tJcJdo 5: 0 '" 0 H U 0 0 '" 0 '" '" ,., "''''''' ~ H " . tf)tI]CIltl1 '" " '" '" "''''''' .. .. I-4HHH '" ,.; ,.; > '" g ,.; ~ '" """":;J .. H 0 :;J:;J:;J:;J 0 '" :Ji ~ Z Z Z '" " '" Z tl]tIl(l]tIlCll'CllOl . t!JUOOE-+ H H H ZZZE-t Z '" H o:(~..c.cC..c<or:C -" Z ZZZZo ;! ;! ;! ~ " 0000 H H ~ DlJOClOCJ" 0 I-II-II-ll-+E-+ !J Z I-ll-lH8 " '" .. 000::'1 ..... ..... ..... '" H "'''''' ~ '" ..... :;J~~~~~~ 13 ZZz;ZCt: i:i '" '" '" .. tIltlltllO: '" '" I-ll-ll-ll-+O H H H '" i:i OOOOtoJO ..... H g; 00 0 0 E-q..q..q",qJ .. < < " < '" raora.ra.O H '" < u t5~~~~ 15 '" '" "' '" ~ '" ~~~f5 " '" '" ~~~~~~~ U '" '" " '" '" '" 0 '" < tJUUU> U '" '" U '" ,., 0 0.."1.. 0. > >: " '" ZZZZZZZ . . .. U10C:OO\D '" .. '" .. " 0 " 0000 0 0 '" M""O\DU'l""'.... 13 \DLl'IU"l\DM .. .. '" " .. .. .. \0'0'00 M 0 .. \Dill 0 "'....r"'I 0 0 ""OM""'M .. .. '" .. '" .. .. MNMO"I 0 .. '" ""NOM\DCON :Ji N.-IO'It"-O .. .. M '" 0 .. .. COMCOO'l M .. '" U'IODO....Mt"oO\ N....""lJl..,. .. '" .. .. .. "'''' '" 0 '<I'CU(ll....NNr-l '" ",' ..< ..< ..< '" .. .. '" 5: '" '" '" >>> ..... tl]tI]tIltl] ,.; .. '" '" "''''''' '" E..q..q..q... '" Z~ '" H "''''''' .. o:::tt:Ct:O::: if ci .,'" '" ,., "''''''' "'..... 0000 .. H'" '" '" to.. .; 0.0.0.0. .", U'" ~:;J < '" :;J:;J:;J '" < ~r.J~r.J U '" 0 ~ ~~ U ~~~~~~~ >: ~~c:::~ Z "'H UZ .,'" '" " ZZZ H ., U H'" UO ,.,,., 00 ZH 000 H >'" OC.:H.?OOOO .... ,:;J z" "'''' "'H HO '" ~~ 1;1]1-41-41-4 >: .. "'~ "'0 ZI;I] 1;1] 1;1]1;1] H" "'''' "'''' :cO '" OtIJtI2tr.l ., <., "'.. :;J~:;J~~~~ '" .. Z HOOOO "'.. '" 0:> <lIl U'" 0 OrJ]l;I]l;I] '" "'''' "'''' "'''' 0 ..4..4..4..4 ,,'" ,.;'''' "'''' ., ;!3: HH ~~IIJla:l '" ~>: g; g; 0 0 M H ..u U U U HZ "'.. '" " ...... ,.,'" ,., .. .. ~tr.l(l}(I}(I} 3:H ZO .." "0 0 ., ,., llc:OOO "'''' Z "0 ~~~~!;C~!;C <0 0. QHI-4HH " .,.. ZZ "'" "',., "' ~~ ~~~~ ~::j ~g "'.. H" "'H OOCCO ,.,'" >: HH ~'" ,.,'" >: "''''''' ., ZZZZZZZ U :Jil'i 0 "'., "''' <.. :;J3: ., 00 ..:C H'" 0 ~.. ::E: .. .. .. .. OH Hf< "'Z "'. >: HU r..... .. .. "'''' HU "f< u.. .. ... .. .. .. .. Z'" ~~>O).l "'''' g~ H '" "0 "'" "''''>- u", 513 f<~ ~>O>O>O>O~~).I Z'" '" 1Jtra..ra..r...ra.. 0 "'< ".. Z .. "H CIlra..ra..ra.. '" ra..ra..tz.tz.tz.ra..r... H..... "''' . . . . ",u .,'" 0'" ~. "'''' 0'" >:>: 00 .. .. .. 5" "',., "'''' D.. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..'" 0 ~ ., '" ,., >: >: 0 '" ., '" " H 0 :c Z !:: 3: i'i 0 H '" 3: ~ u..... Z ~ ~ ~ 0 '" U " .. " "'.. ., ., H '" ;! U ., ., H H ",0 > " ,., ,., ,., ,., ,., >: >: >: >: >: "'''' .. [) '" 0 ... "' '" ..."'''' 0 ..." ,.,.."' " \DCIlO"lOr-- ... .. " ,., ,., " " """ ,., ,.,,., ,.,,.,,., ,., MMM""M .. " " 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 000 0 00000 0 :1" .... 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 000 0 00000 0 ~ ,., 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 000 0 00000 0 .... " .. .. .. '" '" "'"'"' "' "'"' "'"'"' .. t.I'ILnUlLnLll "' 0 .... '" '" '" '" '" "''''''' '" "'''' "''''''' '" O"\a'I 0\ a\O"t '" 0 .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. .... ...... .. """""""""" .. ,." .. " ..... ....'" .. Uo > .. .. 0 0 .. .. "' ,., " " " " .... "' '" , ., " ... 0 ... U " ,., ... ...'" "' '" "'00 ... .... " .. " 0..... 0 "''' "''''''' U'lU'l..-f..-fO " 0 '" 0 ... "''''"' 0 0"' "'"'"' MM\DIDM " i:; ., " '" '" "''''... ... 0'" ,.,.... 0"\0"\0"\0'\0 ... ., .... '" ,., ......... '" ...'" """ "'"''""'''''''.-IN ... .... " ~ .. '" ......... .. ...'" ...... \D\D\D\DID '" " .... " ,., U " !l ,., ,., '" 0 ... ......... 0 00 ......0 0 00000 '" '" ,., '" .... '" "''''''' .. ...... .......... '" .....'lI'..........,. 0 8 ,., .. .. '" '" "'''''' " "" "''''' '" NNNNN .. .U 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 000 0 00000 0 " "' 0 ,., 0 "' "'"'"' 0 "'"' .."'''' 0 Lnt.l'lU"lU'lt.l'l .. .., " " "' '" '" "'~'" " ~'" "''''~ 0 0"10\0'\0\0"\ ... '" '" ... " '" "''''''' '" "'''' .......... ... a't 0"\0'1 0\0'1 '" .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. .... ...... .. ..,."""""""" .. " !l 0 ... ,., ... '" "''''' ... "" ............ ,., C"lNNNN ... " 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 000 '" 00000 0 .. .. ... ... ... ... ......... ... ...... .......... ,., f""of""or--r--r-- ... . :;' >>> , , , .... " """ .... ., .,.,., '" .... ............ " "' ,., ,.,,.,,., ., " " .. ...... "" " " " U .. 15 .. .. ..0... .,., "".. " .. .. .... 0 .... " """ ........ WOOl-! ., .... .... i:; .... ,., " """ ,.,,., ........,., .. ,., ,., . " .. ..0. ,.,,.,.. .. .. 0. ., .... " .. ,; ..0. ...... .. 0. " ~ ., ,,~ '" " !;!;!;~ "",., g;g;~~ " ~tr.lt11gtr.l~ ." " " '" " " " """ " ~ . " ,H; " U .... HI-IH~ ,., " "" " ., ,.,,., ,.,,, '" " .... " " " Hi1!" 0 ""0 "0 ~ ~ooooo u " " .. " " 0 """ DOZfo1 ZOOZOE-4 !; " " ~~ .. " .... ..... ............... " ........ "".... "..q... t-4 I-!E." !l '" " ~ '" a:: a:: a:: a:: ""'" HHE-4O:: ~ " "'" ~ ..... .... .... I-lI-lI-lQ ,., ~~g :1:1~g <~~<...JO 0 "" " " " <<<0 ~ O::..:l..:lO::...:lO " U "" ., " ., .. o.o.o.z; ...." l'IJtI:lliJZ " ~i1!i1!~i1!1;1 is U "., " 0 .. .. OOl'lJl'IJl'IJ 0..... ..:l...:lo.td .... " ,,> " U 0 '" 0::0::0:::- " 00> UCJO> .. Ov.ltIJQtIJ;> U . . . . . " ..... 0 ... 0 ... U'lO'Ia'lM '" 0"'''' -iCl'l""'=" 0 N"".-4MNN 0 !l ..." 0 '" 0 0 0\0\0"" .. 0"'''' ......OCllO 0 MOC"lr--OO 0 0 "'" "' 0 0 .... N\DIDt.I'I ... "',.,'" UlNNO 0 f"oal""M""aJ 0 ~ 0"' '" .. '" '" ... '" ... "',.,'" O"\\D","O 0 "...... ,.,,, 0 "'"' '" ........ .. '" ........ ,., ,., ,.,... " U " " .. :1 " . " " ei 0 ..~ .... 8 '" .. " " . " ,., '" .... i!l .. ".. "'u U ~~ ., ~.. " ,.'" U .,'" '" " .. " ,.,....'" ;f "0 . U " " ,.., "" ....'" ""0 ,. "''' 0" " ,,~ ., " 8:1 ,. i1!:l .. .. ,., "0 u", " "., "' ..'" " " 0 .. ,,'" ., " ...." ..'" " " .... " ""''' " .. uu "'" ".. ., '" <0 ""' <'" ,., "''' ,.;;J!; ., " .... u., "0 ,., "'''' ".. "!; "'"' i';iiO .... .... !! " ,." 0.. '" .. " ~ ., !l~ 0" ~ "'" ~~5,., "'" ., "" "" 0 ".. u., .. ., .,., "" ...." "'~"":1 ".. ,., .... ...... ..,., ....'" '" E-ta::CIlCll "....'" !::E-t~8 "., ., !:::1 " " ~o " " ,gj .. ,.,.... ,.0 2000 ~;:::1 ., "u ~., "'~ .. O~ U" "''' "'.. I-Ier..X:r:: .. :1 '.." "'.. " "~ " ..., ........ .,.... U'" "" " " :Ii ....U" " " ~" U>Oa:l l:Q .." u ~el ., ..,., !l~ ~".,., " ""'''' ....,., '" " " :1", u. ""' ". ""'''' . . ...... "''' " 0. . . U ... "" "'" "" "'" :l~ 8~ t:;~~~ i'ii~ i'ii"'''' i'ii""" ., c..)ot>t~c:: '" "'" ., tl~ 0" 0" .... ...."" "" ~:Jer..t&.r:r.O "'.. ......... "''' "" ". "" .. .."'''' .,.... .,. . liJ..Ja.1;I'J "" U rJ)" .. ... E-t .,. ..'" 0 ., .. ., 0 " " " " " .. .... ., " " ii ii " .... " " " " " ~ '" " U..... " " " '" '" '" '" '" ~ 0 "'... .. .... .... .... " 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... ",0 :> " " " " " " " " " " .. .. "'... '" 1) ... ..'" M M\Ol"-Ul .. .. ... 0 .. ....N~M '" .."r--cocno '" 0 M" M ..,.MMM M M 0 .. .. <#'''''''''.... .. ..,..,..,."Lll " Z 0 00 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 00000 :!'" ... 0 00 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 00000 ~ ,., 0 00 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 00000 .... " .. .... .. Lll..,..,...,. .. .. ... .. .. ..,...,."'<$' .. l.l'I""'''''''''''' 0 ... .. .... .. 0'I(7'l0'l0'l .. .. .. .. .. 0'10'10'10"1 .. 0\(J'I0'I0'l(J\ 0 .. .... .. .,..,..,..,. .. .. .. .. .. ..,...,..,...,. .. ..,...,...,...,...,. )0", .. ... , ..... .. Uo :;- '" .. 0 0 .. .. .. ,., " \o("'o(Dl.tl (J'I(I'\O\\o '" r--r--r--O '" I.D\D\OOO U ...-I............. '" ... .. 0 """"..,."" U "'0 .. .. .. 0000 .. .."'... ... g;:; MU'lU'lID 0 '" .-.l.-l.-.4.... a:I....MMM ~ "",000 .. '" ... 0 ........................... ....1J't.............. 0... "' ....0........ ... .. '" ... >>>> IDalOOO .. '" ....U'lLllLtl .. .. 0 .. ................ caca a'I 0'10'\ ... "'M .. MCO<Xlca .. 0 M ... NNNN MMMMM " ... " ,., U ... .................... 15 00 0............ ... 0 ... 0 0 0.-10.... '" ...... CDNNN 0 ... 0 '" ... ""(',1..,.0 0 00000 S "'''' UlNNN .. '" .. '" '" NNNo:I' M MMMMM .(J .. 00 .. 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 00000 " 0 00 0 OLt)Lt)l.l'I 0 0 .. .. .. lJ'tU'lU'lU'l M NNNNN ... "'0 ... NO'\(J'IO"\ '" '" '" .. .. O'ICT\Q'\O'\ .. <f'la'lO'l<1'lO'l .. '" "'''' ... a'l0'I0'l0'l .. '" .. .. ... 0'10'10'\0"1 ... .......-1.........-1 '" .... '" ..,...,..,...,. .. .. .. .. .. ..,...,...,...,. .. ..,...,..,..,."" " ................"'" 15 ... ...... ... U'lNNN ... ... 0 '" ... NNNN M 0 00 0 ..,.000 0 0 '" 0 0 0000 0 00000 .. ... ...... ... Nf"-r"'-t"'- ... ... .. ... ... !"-r--r--r-- ... .................... " ~~~ '" '" '" :;- '" . z '" z z " z ... '" ,., "''''''' '" '" , '" '" ... ~ "' "''''''' ';' ';' '" '" " OlCf.ltf.lrt.lOO ,~ " ......... '" ... , [.::Ir':!r:'::1 rzJ r.:l "' ,.. ,.,,.,,., '" '" ... ,., '" '" UUUUU "'''' " ...... 0 '" 0 ,., '" .. 0 '" I-IHHHH .. ,.. "'''' .. ...... ~ '" ~ .. '" .. "' '" ~5n~~~ 0 ... ...... 000000 ... .. ... a " z ... ,.,,., "''''''' ,., ,., a ,., '" ,., ,., tLll:':!l::'::lr:LIr.LI . 15 .... " .. '" .. ,., tIl C'HI] CI} CIl ... .... ... ..: .. ..: ..: .. '" " '" " 5l5l~ ... !;:!;:!;:~ a a ",!;:",!;:~ '" ~~~~~~ 'tl ~ " '" z '" z z '" . 0 ... HHHE-4 ... ... ... ..::IH..::IHE-t " ZZZZZE-+ -" Z U ""0 .; !;:;lHg ;l " ;l ;l " 8;l8;lg :! 000000 0 zz... z Z HHHHHf-4 '" ... '" ...... z w.................. , ... , , ... E-+......E-+...... tIltf.ltlltllCIJ 15 '" ......'" ... :E:~~c:t:C:: '" ... '" '" ... '" "'''' " tIltlltllrJltfJO::: 1) ~~g PoHHHQ ... ~ ... ... ~ ..::11-1..::11-10 ... rzJr.::IrzJCz:lCz:lO S '" H,cCoeC,r:(O " " -: ~-:~-:" ,., l:&.. Czdl.d~ ~ a " "''''z .. oo.o.o..z .. '" .. .. '" ~ ~~ " oooooz U :! ....'" ... Qll':tJr.Jc.:lrsJ '" .. '" '" .. '" 0:: 0::0: o:cr:taJ -: 00> ,., wo:o:c::> '" 0 '" '" 0 CIlP:tIlC::> " Pdldlo g. 0. > . . . . '" U ... ... ....... 0 (lI..,. co Mt'" .. .. 0 '" .. l.nMOOCO .. OOM""..,.... 15 .. M"''' 0 ........ 0'1 CO.... .. ... 0 '" ... t'-OOOr- .. '-DO t'-CO CO 0 0 ... .. 0.. '" 0'1 t'-o MO'I .. '" .. ... .. lnO'lO'l..,r- ~ lnO'l\Dr-r-r- ~ .. ........ .. ONN\Ot'- .. ... 0 ... '" ...... ... t/)M\Ot'-t'-.... .. ... ........ .. M .. ... M .. M r-....M........\D M M ... " '" ..: '" "' ",[; z ... '" ,., " "'''' " ... '" " ,.. 15 0 ... "'... z ".. S .. '" '" 0'" '" "[;"'15[;[; ... "ZO '" '" '" "'... ...... '" ,., ......,., '" '" ... ... > "'... " ~~~u<< ... ....'" '" " .. '" " ,., "'.. ,.,.. '" ;l ~31;; ... 8..".. '" '" '" " "'... ~'" " CI] Eo< 0. tr:l e..q.,. " ... "'u ~ " > ..'" ... '" '" >zouzz '" "''' "'''' O::Nrz:lN ...-: U ... Cl]8u~88 ..... ~ z> ",u 1Il:f:2: "z " " "'''' .. z"'''' .... "'0 0"''' "':! '" "' ,.,'" .", "'"' '" '" U ~t.::I~~rz:Irz:I ,.. .. Z " S":! " a ..a g u... ",a o E..d~Z " "'''' 0 z "'''' :!"''''''' .. 0'" z'" Z", Uf-trz:lUrz:I 0 rz:IUIo-if-tUU M ... '" " ",a 0"'0 " ...'" "'... ...,.. 0 CI]~Q~!E 0 1'i:!;J1'i:!:! ,., .. ... ~ ,,.,,, ,..'" f-t ~,,:t: ~ Z'" ~~ "'0 '" ...", '" "0 .. ...,., oz z'" ...'" "'" ..'" ,., '... ~~g;!fii(j ....... "'... 0..... ,.,... rz:Irz:ICt.of-tCt.o ..." ..." "'''' '" 8!;:t; .['l z... U ~~ '" ... .. .. zo.tIl....tI) -: ' "'''' s'" ..." au.., f-t f-t :!.. "''' o. . "'" o.tzlf-tQf-t "''' '" . O. ,.,-: ,,'" f-trz:lbl::::>Ol 1;;8 z. . zz z'" ..." ",..,.. "'.. !j~~~~ "~ ,.,,.. "',.. "'" f-tuo::o:: 0::....>>t1-+1-4 z.. '" ,"0 ...... ... ,.,.. ".. "'''' "M Ztzl 0 tzlO "'''' tl;l~~;l;l ..., "''' ;lu . . U,., O'tIl o.u 0. 5'" .... . " ... OQtI)CI]f-t ,'" .... 0 >< ... '" 1;; "' '" ... , '" z '" " ... '" ,., z .. ~ ... u, z '" 0 .. 0 U '" .. .. ... " '" "'... '" 0 '" a " ... 0 " z ... "'0 > .. .. .. '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0:'" '" 1; ~.... M .. l"--U"IO'ICIIOID ~ .... '" M '" "'''' '" '" LnlnU"lU'l\DU"I '" '" .. '" " Z 00 0 0 000000 0 0 0 0 ::I'" ... 00 0 0 000000 0 0 0 0 ~ ,., 00 0 0 000000 0 0 0 0 ..'" " .... .. .. """""""""""" .. .. '" .. 0 ... "'''' '" '" 0'10'10'10'\11\0'1 '" '" '" '" 0 .... .. .. """"....""""... .. .. .. .. >0.... '" ... ..... ...'" .. VO > .. .. 0 0 .. '" '" ,., '" " .. '" .... ... ~ \DO CO ""0'1 U'l .. '" NO"" ""CII N '" .... V '" '" ""........ 0.... CD M '" ... '" .... C7'IU"ICIIO'\C7'IO"t '" '" 0 '" ~ I I I 1 I I '" '" ~ ........ .... ~ ....LI'IU"ILnU'lU'l 0 '" MM ... 0 NU'lU"lU"lU"lU"l ... ... ... "'''' ~ 0 ""r--r--r--r--r-- .... '" Z ... < ,., V ... 15 ~O '" ~ ............I""i-l.... 0 0 0 ~ O~ 0 0 MNNNNN ~ .... ~ .... 0 M .... .. .... MMI'"'IMMM .... .... .... .... V U 00 0 0 00001.110 0 0 0 0 < "'0 .. .... lJ"I..,,\DUlCl'lU'l M M 0 '" ........ ~ '" O'IO\O"\CI"IC7'IO'I .. .. .... '" .. "'.... '" ~ ........................ ~ '" .... '" .... .. .. ....""........,...,. .. .. .. .. 0 . . . . . . ~ ~ 15 o ~ ~ ~ ........................ ~ .... ....0 0 0 000000 0 0 0 0 .. ..~ ~ ~ .............-1........ ~ '" ~ ... 01 ~ . " " ... '" , " ~ " ... " '" ,~ 01 " ,., '" ... 10 V '" '" ... ,., ..." V '" " ,., " '" " >'" ... 0 '" '" '" '" 0 0:'" Ii; " ... '" ... 0 "',., ,., 0 ,., " . "'" '" 01 '" " '" ~ '" " V '" '" ,.; , '" ~O,., ... ~ 0 ... 0 '0 ~ ,,< ,., .. " Z " Z . '" ... :3 .. ... ... ... " '" 0"0 0 rz:lrz3r:.:lr:.:lCIJrz:lQ " ~ " ~ U ...",... ... ZZZZZZ~ '" '" " ... "... V ~ 000000 ... ..... ... ..... 15 ""'0: < X:c:c:r::r::ca:: ... 0: ~ 0: "'<0 0: c..c..a.o.o..o.O ;,l ... ... 0 "0:" ... '" OOl1ll1lr.Jrz:lC:a:lO, < < V 001'" '" '" ..:1..:1..:1..:1..:1..:1:2; '" '" '" '" V 0:"'01 8 '" OOl'zlr:.::lrz:lrz:lrz:lc.J '" '" '" '" < "'0> " E-.q.q..q...q-q.. > 0 0: 0 0: . . ... 000 0 0 C7'1M""r--""LnN 0 .. .... ... 15 000 0 .. C"\.qo('llCOI.DON 0 .. .... M . . . . . . . 0 0"'''' 0 M U'l<DIDNNIDN 0 M M .. ~ 0.... M '" IDMr--U'l\DNN 0 .. '" 0 .. .. '" .... 0'" ....0 ~ .... ~ ~ ... .... " " '" 01 ... " ,., 0 " ... ..." V ... '" '" ::I "''' >0 0: " ... '" "'''' V ... '" ,., z '" zv '" .~ 0 .", '" z z "'u 0: ... v'" " 0 '" vo< !; " "'0 15 V ..... ...,., 0: V '" '" ..." 0: "0 8"'''' .", "'''' V ::1M~~ ... 10 "'" >0 .. '" >'" VIO ...'" ....... '" >0 Z Z" ".... 0 5~~ "'z < ~=Il= o::#c.# ,.,... ... ..... M ... ...'" ,..... ,.,0 ,,0: "'''' Ol 15~ ~.; ... ... '" V ,., :E: .~ 3: . M . "'''' "'''' 0: '" ~"'... 'Ol "'.. :EE-t E-tZE-t ...Ol 00 ti~ ...~ "'... ...'" "'0 '" o ell U tIJ I-Hr.1 ...... " >0 V ~5 ...... ,., 00: V ... '" ~g 0: ::I~ "0 ::I", " V. "'" c.J)04..:1rz:lClltIJ OlOl .. "''' ::IrBi >0>0 '" t;~!::~~~e; v,., ~~ 0'" 00. Z'" '" v.. "0 0 .....0 ~~ ........ 0:0 103., . z... Cl1~Uo.r~.cf.ltz. ,..> ,.,,, ..'" 0 0: 0: '" 3 Ol 10 '" .... 0 0 '" ... ,., ... '" v..... z gJ '" " " ~ " Z '" o:~ 01 0 >0 01 ... '" 100 > " " " 0 > 3 3 " "'''' '" g '" 0 z :ij['5 .... ,., < .... 0 0 .... 0 >0'" .. ... .... ....'" .. Uo :;- '" .. 0 0 .. .. '" ,., " '" U .... 0 i; .... " .... < ,., U ... 1i 0 U -u < .. 0 1i .. . ... ... '" "' .. 0 . ... '" , '" ~ . -" z 0 ... " 1i 0 '" U " U .... < 0 0 0 ... 0 0 15 '" '" ... 0 .... z ~ .. .... '" '" ,; .. '" " 0 '" 0 U '" '" " '" ..... "0 >0 .. "'" M ,., .. <0 U.... :ij", Z'" ........ ..'" '" U.... "'.... ",0 z o .... ... .. "'.... "'" <U Z" '" "'0 o o z '" > " ~ ~ b; o .. '" '" "'., .,,, ~~ c"' ~6 ., ..'" o o >0'" ... . H", UO :;- <II'" 00 "'.. 0"' ,.,,., "" " ., ...'" <110 >0 .. <II'" ~~ HH U ~'" "'" H'- ..'" '" U,- "'H ",0 . ~ ~ .~ "' ~ o . ~ . ." . -" U " .. " U ., '" Cl ~ .. " ... " ., " ., " '" " "' " H Cl ~om~omomO~O~OOM~~~~ ~~~No~~~~mO~O~OO~M~ ~MmOO~OM~m~~~MMm~MO O~O~ONMm~Nmomm~M~~M m~~~NNM~~ ~OmN~mMN~ ...-l..-lMt"- .. H '" H ......N M..-l l!J H ... "' H '" U <II ., Cl Cl '" Cl f-l ~ gf ~ 2: ~~~ :E ra:I a:l !XI:> r-t< 0 +..H/J..... 0> rooQ ........r-- I-IOf-lZ :E~~~~~~: ~~~8~ 0 c::: tI] ~ \,Q 0\ O'l...... :J r... I-l I (J f3 ~~c:::~:~~, ~ .~~~ ..... ~f-lttl]~~'tI] ~t~:~ f-l Z~Q<O Qooz&i..-t~ f!i ~~6~:~~~~u8c:::.....~ :EO c;:;~g:a:l~CQ~lQer..~tI} .ctIl ~f3 ZO::::l E-I' .lQ ':W::::E:W:: U tI] f-l :> r... :> c:lItJ2t1l!X O::f3 e::a::C2CQQl .....~ra:l3~~~~~e::~~~~~f3f3ra:1~ ~C:::~a:lra:lOI-lUI-lE-lI-l :Ea:lra:l.....r...~" ..(O:?ta 2: >uo:> :E D::f-l c. 0 '" .1-1 .0:: .",;11'-04 U .ocr: e:: ra:lOOHIe::c:::O Ora:lO~'C:::C:::ra:lOOE-l~ ~~~~~~ .~ .~f.i~e:~~~~~~ O~UOOHHCf-lO~e::~f-lHH~tI]Ue:: Cl 15 .. .-l\,Q~O'lMr--~r--mCXI.-lor--CXIm.-lNNM ON~.-lNM~~.O'ION~.moooo .-lNNMMMMMMM...~~\,Q\,Qr--r-- o '" H .. '" o '" " Cl ~ .. ,., ~ g ... "' 6 ., '" .. ~ "' <II ... " ., " ., " '" " "' " H Cl o 0 '" '" H H .. .. '" '" o 0 '" '" " .. U ., :z: U ., ~ z ~ ., f:i " .. ~ "' ., " ,., "' " .. ~ "' ,., ~ ~ ... o ... ... z ., " >0 '" "' '" o .. Cl ., i5 '" "' "' " Cl ~ Cl ., 3: ., H '" ., '" " ~ ., ,., ~ " "' " ,., ,., H "' .. o ... " H ,., " Z H Cl ., U ., '" "' ., :z: ... >0 "' Cl ., i5 '" "' "' " ., !< Cl "'''' "'" >-< 0," ,,'" :i!'" i!; "U o o >-'" ... ~ ~ Uo ':' ,,'" 00 ~.. o~ ,.,,., "" . . . . . . . . . . . . ; A, ; . . I.~~ . . . . . . '" '" '" to . . . . ... (J)(J)C!lW'" . . . . .. 0'\0"10"10'\'" . . . . ... ............................ . . . . ... M M M M'" . . . . ... COO 0'" . . . . -II .............................. . . . . ... NN NN'" . . . . .. 0000... . . . . ............ if... . . ......... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............. ... . ~ ~ ,~ "' '" o . ~ " " . .<: u " " OJ ...~ ".. >- "0 ~ ,., -<~ ~ ~ U :i!", z~ ~.... ..~ '" U.... "'~ ",0 " ... z OJ " OJ '" '" :> "' " ~ " '" ~ .... '" o .... '" o " o ,~ " U . ~ . " " ~ o a. . '" ... z OJ " ... " z o OJ U " " 8 '" ~ -< '" ... o -< '" " o '" " :> ~ o , '" OJ " " ~ S " ~o '"~ U . .'" "'" ,~ 0 ,., ~ '"'" ,., " ... z OJ " OJ " !5 "' " ~ " . u ." a. " " ~ oz '" ~ . " " ,~ ~ '" e ~ o .. . . ,~ ~ 0.0 o ..U . " '" o ~ ..-11-1....... ".'" U "0 " ".... ~ . '" ""," . " 1J' ~.Q'" o "" " '" '" ~ .... '" o .... '" o ~ ~ .. , '" ~ ~ ~ '" o '" o , Q "'.... '" 1; .... N M .. """ ""'" "'0 '" 0 0 0 0 00 00 0.... " " 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 ~~ .... 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 '" 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 .. ..'" " '" '" '" '" "'''' "'''' "'''' 0 .... '" '" '" '" "'''' "'''' "'''' 0 .. .. .. .. .... .... .... >ON '" .. ..... ....'" .. Uo :;- '" "" 0 0 .. '" '" '" " '" U .... "'''" ~ "'''' ..'" "'''' .... NN " .... .. '" U .. !l .... ........ 0 00 0 M MM -U U .... 0 .... .... ........ 00 ........ .. .... '" .... .... ........ "'''' ........ "" '" "" "" """" NN """" .. .... .... .... .... ........ "'''' ........ N .. N N NN .... NN " .... .... """" ........ !l .... .... ........ 0 0 0 0 00 .... 00 .. .... .... .... .... ........ .... ........ ;;; ;;; >0 >0>0 >0>0 . .. .... .... .... '" '" '" "'''' "'''' .... " "" '" " '" " " ~~ "'''' "" "' 0 U 0 0 UU 00 .... .... .... .... ........ ........ ........ ... t 5; t t !it :>:> tt 0 "'''' ::> '" ::> ::> ::>::> "'''' ::>::> . " " " " "" "" "" .... '" '" '" "'''' "'''' " '" " '" " " ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ 'tl ::i .. . " " " " "".. "".. "".. -" " '" 0 '" '" "''''0 000 "''''0 U " .... " " "".. .......... "".. " .. ..... " ..... ..... .......... "" .......... !l " " " " 00'" ""'" 00'" " '" " " ""0 "''''0 1.1&18 0 '" .. '" '" "''''0 ....0 U '" 0 '" '" "'''''' 00" ~~~ U '" '" '" '" "''''''' "''''''' .. 0 '" 0 0 "0:> "'''':> 00:> . . . .. 0 0 0 0 OMM OM'" ""0"" !l 0 0 "" 0 OMM M"'N 0"'''' 0 N .. '" '" 0"'''' ...."'''' ...."'''" ::i '" N M .... NM'" ...."'''' "'''"''' N .. .. "'..'" ......'" "'''' ... MM "" ........ '" UU " ........ 0: t :>:> .. ::> .. oi "'''' "' ~ " "' "'''' 1;1~ " '" " " "" .... .. " .... ..... ".... '" " '" '" "'''' ~~ "'''' '" 0 " '" "'" "'" " U 15 15", "" 15., '" '" '" 00 ..'" ~ .. OJ ~ ~~ "........ ~~ ".. " " 8"" >0 .. " '" .... "" "0 0 .. .." >0'" '" "''''''' '" .... .... 0" 0" "'''' .. "'.. .... "'.. ~.:; .. "" " '" " " " "00 " '" 0'" >0'" ei~ Ol ....15'" ~"'''' "'15'" ........ Ol.... :x: 0 .." "0 " " 0.0. :i! ~ U ::if) "''' !l~ :x:U 0" " " ~'" .....'" ".... ..'" "'....'" .. . . ........'" "" "'" 0 ....." .....'" 0"'" >0>0 0"'" "'" '" 0'" U'" "'" "'" ...."'''' ".... ....."'''' ......... "'0 "0 ....'" 0" 0" 1;1"" OJ' . "''''' ..'" 0 '" ~ .. " " '" N " '" " ~ " 0 .. U..... " " 0 .... ~ U '" "'.... '" ~ ~ '" 0 U ::> ",0 :> U ., " " "'''' '" 1; '" 0 z ::if'! H '" .. ..0. 0 0 H 0 "'''' 0. ... .... H'" .. Uo :;- '" .. 0 0 ... 0. '" '" " '" U H 0 ~ H " H .. '" U ... !5 0 -U U .. .. 0 !5 .. . .... .... '" "' ... 0 . .... . '" 'tl ~ . .<: u '" ... !5 8 0 .... U 0 .. 0 0 0 ... ,., 0 !5 '" '" ... 0 ,.. z :Ii .... H ,., '" ,.: 0. a> '" 0 '" 8 '" '" " '" ...'" "'... '" .. "'0 .... '" .. ...... H.... U ::im z'" H.... ..'" '" u.... "'.... ",0 z o H ... 0. "'H :Ii!'i "'" '" "'0 o o Z '" > '" '" .. ... o ... ... '" o .. '" '" "'Ol Ol" >< 0'" 0'" ~tJ Ol Oo'" o o ,..'" ,.. , ....'" uo > , "'''' 00 "'.. O~ .,., "" ,.; z Ol >: ,.. < Oo '" 0 Oo 0 Ol ~ '" Oo Oo < 0 '" '" ~ ,.. 0... ... ,.. ... ... . z 0'" '" z '" '" .... Ol Ol 0 .... >: "'~ ... >: ... ... Ol '" Ol ..'" .... Ol .... .... 3 "' '" ...~ ... '" ... ... Ol '" !5 .... '" " ...... ... ... ... &; 0 "' ....... ~ "' ~ ~ '" '" '" . .... .... .... 0 0 '" ,.. , :i "' 'tl . 0 -" Ol Ol U ., ~ '" ~ '" ,.. Oo < Oo Oo < '" ., ., .... "' Oo 0 ,.. '" .... ., " Z .... 0 Ol Z U 0 ., .... '" !< Oo Ol N Ol ,.. .... :c < ~ ,.. 0 .... &; >: '" '" Ol " ,..'" 0 U "'.. 15 ~~ Ol ,.. .. :c "'0 .... OoOl '" U '" .... ,.. >: 0 " :l':: Oo ~8 ~ ~ ~ .... ........ '" Oo "' U Oo U Ol' Oo Ol Ol ~~ tJ '" ZOo ., tJ ~ z ., Ol Ol.... :l Ol :l z'" Ol 0 ",.. Ol Z " .... -. '" '" Oo'" ~ ~ '" 0 0 " " Ol u-. ~ ~ ....... ~ ~ " "'.... 0.. 0 ., ",0 Oo Oo ...... ,.. "' "' "' ,.. C-, (L (Y\TS .:1js/92ttoneywen Clinton O. Larson Corporate Vice President Operations, Retired Honeywell Ine. Honeywell Plaza P.O. Box 524 Minneapolis, MN 55440-0524 612 951-0106 612 951-0079 Fax 612 427-3612 Home 612 323-3900 Fax E-Mail:cIint.larson@corp.honeywell.com RECEIVED JAN 2 9 1998 CITY OF ANDOVER January 27, 1998 The Honorable Jack McKelvey Mayor of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 Dear Mayor McKelvey: I'm writing as a resident of Andover who is deeply concerned with the uncontrolled use of snowmobiles on the city streets, roads, and the Rum River, While I fully understand the use of the snowmobile as a recreational vehicle on the snowmobile trails, I do not understand the permissive laws which allow the snowmobilers to violate what I believe is the law, As an example, it's my understanding that the snowmobiles are not to go any faster than 15 mph along the side of city streets or even along County Road 7, which is the county road that I live off of, I also understand they are prohibited from private property, something which, as you know and Bonnie has experienced, is often violated. Of particular concern is the use of the snowmobile on the Rum River, It's used as a speedway, snowmobiles certainly speeding in excess of 60-80 mph on that river. The current game is to jump the open water, and while I don't think we've had the incidences that have occurred on Prior Lake, the potential is certainly there. Last summer you and the Council visited a slow-wake zone for the Rum River, something which I, as a resident on the river, strongly support. The river is a recreational river for canoes, tubing, and fishermen, It is not a speedway for personal watercraft, and subsequently, in winter should not be a speedway for the snowmobile. Based on history, I have great personal reservations that the SnoDragons can in fact handle snowmobile enforcement, although I respect your decision to give them that opportunity. However, if things continue as they are, it's my personal belief that the snowmobile should be banned from residential streets, should be controlled along the highways, and should be speed-controlled, as a minimum, and possibly banned from use on the river. I know many citizens in Andover who support Ms, Dehn in her concerns with the snowmobile activity, Sincerely, c. 0, Larson 10 ~Jc-&J-Jl CC: Bonnie Dehn c... Q.. (Y\TS .:1/s/9211oneywell Clinton O. Larson Corporate Vice President Operations, Retired HoneyweU Ine. HoneyweU Plaza P.O. Box 524 Minneapolis, MN 55440-0524 612 951-0106 612 951-0079 Fax 612 427-3612 Home 612 323-3900 Fax E-Mail:clint.1arson@corp.honeyweU.com RECEIVED JAN 2 9 1998 CITY OF ANDOVER January 27, 1998 The Honorable Jack McKelvey Mayor of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 Dear Mayor McKelvey: I'm writing as a resident of Andover who is deeply concerned with the uncontrolled use of snowmobiles on the city streets, roads. and the Rum River, While I fully understand the use of the snowmobile as a recreational vehicle on the snowmobile trails, I do not understand the permissive laws which allow the snowmobilers to violate what I believe is the law, As an example, it's my understanding that the snowmobiles are not to go any faster than 15 mph along the side of city streets or even along County Road 7, which is the county road that I live off of, I also understand they are prohibited from private property, something which, as you know and Bonnie has experienced, is often violated, Of particular concern is the use of the snowmobile on the Rum River, It's used as a speedway, snowmobiles certainly speeding in excess of 60-80 mph on that river, The current game is to jump the open water, and while I don't think we've had the incidences that have occurred on Prior Lake, the potential is certainly there, Last summer you and the Council visited a slow-wake zone for the Rum River, something which I, as a resident on the river, strongly support, The river is a recreational river for canoes, tubing, and fishermen. It is not a speedway for personal watercraft, and subsequently, in winter should not be a speedway for the snowmobile. Based on history, I have great personal reservations that the SnoDragons can in fact handle snowmobile enforcement, although I respect your decision to give them that opportunity. However, if things continue as they are, it's my personal belief that the snowmobile should be banned from residential streets, should be controlled along the highways, and should be speed-controlled, as a minimum, and possibly banned from use on the river. I know many citizens in Andover who support Ms, Dehn in her concerns with the snowmobile activity, Sincerely, C. O. Larson 10 /J/\Lj <...;..L.! N-i d..# 7, CC: Bonnie Dehn