HomeMy WebLinkAboutWK September 27, 2005
,
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NoW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
City Council Workshop
Tuesday, September 27, 2005
7:00 p.m.
Conference Rooms A & B
1. Call to Order - 7:00 p.m.
I.
2. Discuss Fencing & Retaining Wall Permits - Engineering
3. Present Draft Concrete Curb & Gutter Policy - Engineering
4. Discuss Rural Reserve Planning - Planning
5. Discuss Transitional Commercial/Industrial, Continued - Planning
6. Consider Various Code Revisions, Continued - Planning
7. 2006-2010 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Update - Finance
8. Update of Hanson Boulevard NW & Bunker Lake Boulevard NW Improvements/04-23 -
Engineering
9. Other Business
10. Adjoumment
-'
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NoW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Agenda Items for the September 27,2005 Workshop meeting
DATE: September 27,2005
As you are well aware, a significant effort by City Staff was put into responding to the September
21 st storm resulting in a limited amount of time preparing sorne of the staff reports for the
September 27, 2005 workshop. A number of the agenda items will be supplemented with
additional handouts and verbal presentation at the meeting.
Thank you for your understanding.
i
.........
S1\NDbVE~
o
'\
/
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Council Members
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
David D. Berkowitz, City Engineer
Discuss Fencing & Retaining Wall Permits - Engineering
September 27,2005
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is requested to review the proposed fence and retaining wall permit.
DISCUSSION
Attached is a draft fence and retaining wall permit for your review. Also attached is information requested at
the last workshop showing the surrounding cities and their requirements and fees.
I ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to direct staff on how to proceed with fence and retaining wall permit.
Respectfully submitted,
Q~0.
,
David D. Berkowitz /'
Attachments: Draft Fenc:;:-nd Retaining Wall Permi( Other Cities Requirements
CITY OF ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304.
(763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
FENCE PERMIT APPLICATION
Permit No.:
Date:
Property Owner:
Phone:
Address:
Signature:
Property corners (stakes) must be exposed before the permit will be approved.
Provide lot surveyor plat showing the proposed fence location. If a surveyor plat is
not available, provide a sketch drawing in the space provided below.
r..--...R......-...-..--.----..-...--..-..---.......-..--......-..-..-.-...-......--......--..-.-..-..----............-.--.......--........-..-......--...-.........-..-......................-.............-..-..-.......--...............-,
i Sketch (location of house, garage, streets, property lines) i
! j
I ;
i i
I I
i i
! I
! i
! I
1 !
! 1
! i
! I
i i
! I
I I
I I
l_______________oo._oo_oo._oo.__oo______.__________.__oo._oo._.__.__._._00__00___.__00_00________.__.______.________.__._._00_00._._____--1
Staff comments:
Setback from front property line (adjacent to public street):
Maximum Height:
Fee: $25.00
Approved By:
State Surcharge: + .50
Date:
TOTAL:
$25.50
G:IDA T A 1ST AFF\RHONDAA \FORMSIPennit Applications\Fence Pennit.doc
CITY OF ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304.
(763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
RETAINING WALL PERMIT
APPLICATION
Permit No.:
Date:
Property Owner:
Phone:
Address:
Signature:
Property corners (stakes) must be exposed before the permit will be approved.
Provide lot surveyor plat showing the proposed retaining wall location. If a surveyor
plat is not available, provide a sketch drawing in the space provided below.
...._.._..____.__.._.__..._..._..M.___.__..._..__...___..__._...M...M.___...M.___..__..._.____.___._____...______.__.__..___.._.______.___.._.._..__..____.___
. .
. .
i i
Sketch (location of house, garage, streets, property lines)
'\
j
"
,
l...________..._..._.._.._..___.._._..__..___.._..__.._._______.._.._._.._.__.._.____..____._.._..___._.__....________._____._____.__._.._.____..___._..__.J
If the wall is over 4 ft. provide an engineered design (registered engineer signature required).
Staff comments:
Setback from front property line (adjacent to public street):
Maximum Height:
, Fee: $25.00 Approved By:
!
/
State Surcharge: + .50
Date:
TOTAL: $25.50
a:\DA T A\ST AFF\RHONDAA \FORMSIPennit ApplicationslRetaining Wall Pennit.doc
/
Permitting Processes of Other Cities
Coon Rapids: no permits for fences and only permits for retaining walls over 4 ft.;
haven't had any issues with fences; have clause saying that iffence is in critical
easement, needs to be removed at there expense; spoke with Leah.
j Blaine: yes on both; only permit for retaining walls over 4 ft.; need to find all property
corners; show survey to city showing plan; $25; final inspection done; Tammy.
j Anoka: spoke with Pam and Robbie; $25.50 for fences and retaining walls over 4 ft.; need
j drawing showing installation location; inspection done.
Ramsey: $15/permit; no inspection; any fence requires permit process; anything over 6
ft., the Building Dept. handles; retaining walls over 4 ft. get building permit; spoke with
Kris Anderson.
J
/
~NDbVE~
(3
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NoW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: David D. Berkowitz, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Present Draft Concrete Curb & Gutter Policy - Engineering
DATE: September 27, 2005
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is requested to review the attached draft concrete curb and gutter policy.
DISCUSSION
The draft concrete curb and gutter policy is attached for your review.
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to review the draft concrete curb and gutter policy and give staff
direction on how to proceed.
Respectfully submitted,
9;:;~~I~J
. --
.J
Attachments: Draft Concrete Curb & Gutter Policy
CITY OF ANDOVER
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER POLICY
Adopted:
DRAFT
(Sept. 27, 2005)
,
/
Section I.
Section II.
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER POLICY
Table of Contents
General Policy Statement
Street Improvement Projects
Page
1
2
CITY OF ANDOVER
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER POLICY
SECTION I - General Policy Statement
The purpose of this policy is to establish a standard requirement on when and where concrete
curb and gutter is required for new developments, reconstruction projects, park property and local
businesses.
In 1998, the City began a process to require all new street construction projects (urban and rural)
and reconstruction projects that have existing bituminous curb to be constructed with concrete
curb and gutter. Prior to that only new urban street construction projects required concrete curb
and gutter.
Concrete curb and gutter provides many benefits to a street improvement project and the
neighboring properties. The benefits include:
1. hnproved drainage concentrating storm water flow in the gutter line reducing "bird
baths" and erosion on the roadway which cause structural failure of the roadway.
2. Concrete curb lasts longer than bituminous curb. Snow plows tend to wear down or
remove the bituminous curb. Concrete is much stronger and can withstand years of
plowing and the freeze/thaw cycles.
3. Concrete curb provides structural support to the edge of the roadway providing a longer
lifecycle for the pavement, which in turn reduces long-term maintenance costs.
4. Concrete curb provides a guide on the edge of the road on rainy/dark/foggy nights. This
improves the safety for motorists and pedestrians.
5. Future reconstruction projects will be less expensive with the concrete curb remaining in
place. Less disruption to existing boulevards, plantings and mailboxes.
6. Concrete curb provides a more aesthetic appearance and distinct edge of the roadway.
7. Concrete curb will minimize the potential for erosion both during and after construction.
There are several different types of street improvement proj ects that are constructed within the
City of Andover. They are as follows:
I. New Urban Residential Subdivision*
2. Municipal State Aid Projects*
3. New Rural Residential Subdivision*
4. Reconstruction Projects
. Rural w./ Existing Bituminous curb*
. Rural w./ Drainage Ditches
. Rural w./ no curb or drainage ditches*
. Urban w./ Concrete Curb*
5. City Parks**
6. Business Areas (Commercial, Retail, Industrial)*
* Requires concrete curb and gutter
** City Council discretion
i
\
)
SECTION II - Street Improvement Projects
This section describes each type of street improvement project and details if and when concrete
curb and gutter shall be required.
The nature of the street improvements dictate whether or not concrete curb and gutter is required.
This section describes the type of street improvement, curb and gutter requirement and
assessment policy, if applicable.
New Urban Residential Subdivision
New urban residential subdivisions consist of new plats in the MUSA boundary with standard
street sections and widths of 33 feet, storm sewer which complies with the City's Water Resource
Management Plan, sanitary sewer and municipal water. The City has required concrete curb and
gutter in these areas since the early 1980's. The concrete curb and gutter is assessed to the
benefiting properties as part of the original construction if the project is a city project. If the
developer installs the improvement, the full improvement is paid by the developer.
Municipal State Aid Proiects
)
Municipal State Aid projects are street improvement projects that are on a City designated State
Aid Route. Street widths and sections vary due to the higher volumes of traffic. MnDOT State
Aid office sets the requirements for the design standards which include concrete curb and gutter.
In most cases concrete curb and gutter is a requirement. For new construction through a new
development the concrete curb and gutter is assessed to the benefiting properties as part of the
original construction. For existing roadways, the City Council has the discretion to construct
concrete curb and gutter and that would be identified in the feasibility report.
New Rural Residential Subdivision
New rural residential subdivisions consist of new plats outside the MUSA boundary with
standard street sections, street widths and storm sewer which complies with the City's Water
Resource Management Plan. The City has required concrete curb and gutter in these areas since
1998. The developer pays for the improvement as part of the development.
Reconstruction Proiects
Rural subdivisions with existing bituminous curb: Bituminous curb in existing rural
subdivisions was constructed to convey and channelize storm water runoff. The City requires that
concrete curb and gutter replace the bituminous curb in the areas. Refer to Figure #1 in the
Appendix for an example. The concrete curb and gutter and associated costs shall be assessed to
the benefiting properties.
Rural subdivisions with drainage ditches: These type of existing developments have
drainage ditches, which exist to handle storm water runoff and temporarily pond water until
infiltration occurs. No curb is required in these areas. Refer to Figure #2 in the Appendix. No
assessments shall be required.
\
/
Rural subdivisions with no curb or drainage ditches: These type of existing
developments typically convey storm water runoff by channelizing it along the sod line to a low
J
point in the road where the water is discharged. Low points in the road or intermediate low areas
in the boulevard handle most of the runoff. The City requires concrete curb and gutter in these
areas. Refer to Figure #3 in the Appendix for an example of these developments. The concrete
curb and gutter and associated costs shall be assessed to the benefiting properties.
Urban subdivisions with concrete curb and gutter: These types of developments have
existing concrete curb and gutter, which was constructed to convey storm water runoff into storm
water conveyance system. For reconstruction projects in these areas, damaged curb would be
replaced. The existing curb would remain in place and no costs associated with replacement of
damaged or deteriorated curb would be assessed.
Citv Parks
City Parks projects consist of construction of off street parking areas. Two different park settings
exist; rural parks and urban parks. The City Council has the discretion to determine the type of
curb, if any, at the time of design. A rural setting or special circumstance can require bituminous
curb or no curb. The concrete curb and gutter and associated costs shall be funded by Park
Dedication or other funding sources as determined by the City Council.
Business Areas (Commercial. Retail. Industrial)
/
Commercial, retail and industrial land uses in urban and rural areas provide driveways and
parking areas to serve customers. The City requires concrete curb and gutter in these areas and
the improvements are funded by the developer.
Adopted
Attest:
Mayor
City Clerk
. ,
APPENDIX
,.
~~~' : ~ I',
. ~ ~~I'_'f.
~. .~..,.;: o_~- _"
,
~.....' ".
.... , ~ "....
1.'. . ~".. ." ..
"I.n... ...~...:...
t... ~ ~ ,
- . ~.~,. ......
i, '. ~.;\, "-i-: .
.O..:.....}... ".'.' .'......
,.~....,...
r'i.' -~ -~. .,.
~. ~ ~~~ ~:'c~" .e." ",-~
f-
l.i-', -
;'-'.'~"~-
. ~....tC\..;,,.~.......
.....
.'
~"
-,
r ..'
~, -'
'- -
S .-,
~~_i::!-ft~;: .~
~. .~. :~:rt~.:.'>
...,.~.~~-...._'"
"~: ~:;~.J, _ ".., ,"
~"""_""'r. .
~~:fj-;:.~ ~i:;;~L~~_.~. '_ _~ ~.' ~'~~3__~ .:.c~~:-. ~ L ~
'.
"-
\.
l........ .-~
$, c. ...:~__.~' '-#>_,
.-'---i.:'-~:, ..:.-..c.:.....;.,
. .
'1
."-., ~ )_'<:~~Y~~r~~~\tl
-""-n . ,< ,'" ".~>...-. -. ....1l,;.
.~ ....t..y_;....~ j L ',,_I ~1~J ~c:. ;; _ __{
-- 1 ...,:"')..~ 1..~: t...... ~j~ ~.~? ':'~ ~tt':'
...-._:~.-;L~};jJ ;:::\~;~~~
-.-..~~-~"':";"
_:~.... ~. .......:~.
F:CG-. ~.1
....
-
~~~..': .
.,
~. ..
.. ~ ".' ~
- :':....:~ .
,.
.... ~
'<--_::~-"~~~,~:~;. .!.~
'. ,:. - d<"",:~~,~., i
~ ... '..~.
~~_. ~.~ :~;,..r....
::~~_~f_. ;~ .;'.-.
'~I~~..".1'.J'1
-.: - ~;~..=.~-4;'''~1
. ...~. ~
>.-,1..,
',",
,
.... .....--,. .".
SEP
-J 9-
-, .--.,---
CWjJ~
~ _ -1 ;. ., ' i
-. .L..~;~-:.:.:-.....~~...__~~.~"':-.:.l
F" J:G- -;tf: 2
,
j
i
<
. -" ~..
":v..."
-..
-;
..
.
'-'[3
.:::I!:. -.
TO
.~
?nnc;
-...,.,-~-
1
i
~.~, ..J
.- -;""--".
..
.
;
I
.....fr._ .
----.y
,I
FTG- ~3
cv
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W_ . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO:
Mayor and Councilmembers XJ
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator G'
Will Neumeister, Community Development Director ~
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Discuss Rural Reserve Planning -- Planning
DATE:
September 27, 2005
INTRODUCTION
This report is to keep the Council informed and ask for guidance on the next steps in planning the Rural
Reserve Area. As you will recall, this was the highest ranked goal for 2005. As was introduced in August, the
staff would like to begin work on planning the future urbanization of the Rural Reserve Area. This month the
Council is being asked to review the base information and provide basic comments and direction on a variety
of issues that will begin to set the tone for the Rural Reserve Area.
DISCUSSION
Base Information
The following information related to land in the Rural Reserve Area shall be shown and discussed (see
attached):
. Topography/Slopes
. Trees
· Wetlands
. Flood Plain
To help determine what can be planned for the Rural Reserve Area, information on land parcel ownership and
gas line easement location are also provided as base information.
Developing Site Concepts
The physical planning work for the Rural Reserve Area involves identifying the major design features that will
be incorporated into the planning/design process, and includes such things as:
· Collector street connections to the existing roadways
· Does a bridge need to be planned to cross Coon Creek?
. Location, type and number of parks that are needed
· Location and size of potential large water body (or bodies)
,I
To guide staff and developers in planning the Rural Reserve Area, the Council is asked to discuss what they
feel the identity of this area should have. Other issues that major new development areas ofthis type may need
to have thought and discussion on, include:
J
. Collector Streets
· Parkways and Boulevards (i.e. landscaping/design of collector street and arterial edges)
. Entrances
. Neighborhoods
· Lakes, Ponds and Bays
. Amount of Park and Open Space
These issues are detailed on the attached sheets. Over the next several meetings, staff will need general
direction as to what the City Council's recommendations are regarding them.
Next Steps
Another session of Rural Reserve Area planning is tentatively being scheduled for October 25, 2005. The
following issues will be framed and discussed at that time:
. Developing a Land Use Plan (i.e. establish housing types, neighborhood commercial area)
· Establishing Housing Density (what's the overall density, net of wetlands, floodplain and ponds?)
. Locating a Second Water Treatment Plant
· School District Issues (i.e. how to handle additional students from this area)
At a previous meeting, the Council discussed having a tour of other cities and seeing other new development
areas. Because the daylight hours are getting shorter, staff would like to know what time of day the Council
would be available for the tour. This tour could start around 3 p.m. and go until dark. Staff needs to know the
dates that the Council could be available for this tour.
,
)
Detailed Plans
As staff indicated in August, the task of completing a detailed plan submission for the area will be the
developer's responsibility. The land developers will be required to prepare a detailed master plan that reflects
the standards and basic land planning concepts the City Council has established at the next couple of workshop
meetings. After this has been done, staffwill begin to meet with property owners/developers to relate to them
the direction given by the City Council.
ACTION REOUESTED
The Council is asked to review the attached information, and begin discussing the development of the some of
the basic concepts for developing the Rural Reserve Area.
Respectfully SUb~L
Will Neumeister
Attachments
Rural Reserve Map v ../
Base data maps of the Rural Reserve Area
Issue Sheets -'
/
-2-
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N_W_ . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
RURAL RESERVE PLANNING (Sept. 27, 2005)
o PARKWAYSANDBOULEVARDS
As new collector streets are built, the City will need to guide the developers as to the
design standard for pavement width, boulevard width, and buffer areas adjacent to the road.
Minimums for acceptable levels of physical improvements will need to be clearly
established. Also tied into this planning is establishing the location and design standards
for trails and paths. Most of the trails will be built within the public right-of-way and their
design and location will need to be known up front.
Each parkway or boulevard will have its own planting therne that will help or orient the
motorist, pedestrian or cyclist while providing view opportunities of the lakes and water
features. Channels and bridges will elevate and provide view corridors to the lakes.
The primary collector parkway will be contained within a 120 foot wide public right-of-
way, with additional landscape easement of variable
depths creating a parkway "green corridor" that can
expand up to 100 feet and create a linear greenway
of220 feet of width. These parkways and boulevards
will include sidewalks, bike trails, landscaping,
undulating berms and medians. The linear parkway
and boulevards are intended for passive recreation or
pedestrian travel with opportunities for active
recreation such as bicycling, running, cross-country
skiing, or other suitable activities.
A cross-section diagram of the typical collector
roadway is attached and will be discussed at the meeting.
The Council will need to review the diagram and advise
the staff whether this is a concept that will be required to
be implemented in the Rural Reserve Area.
,
,
-y-
Parkway Planting Concel21
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NoW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER_MN_US
RURAL RESERVE PLANNING (Sept. 27, 2005)
o NEIGHBORHOODS/ENTRANCES
Creation of neighborhoods with special character and identity is a goal of the planning
process. With an area as large as the Rural Reserve Area, it will be important that the
entry features to a given area establish a special theme that will be carried through
portions ofthe entire 1,000 acres. For example, the "Lakes" in Blaine had 30 distinct
neighborhoods.
Many times, there are new homes that are not able to be fit on a standard 80 wide lot, and
discussion is needed on setting standards for wider lots, larger homes, or requirements
that are typically found in covenants.
Neighborhood plans establish standards for homes in a given area and the density that
will be allowed. With the large amount oflake and open space this area will have, it will
mean neighborhoods will be smaller and more distinctly separated from one another,
unlike older suburban neighborhoods that seem to go on endlessly with no physical
separation or any idea of where an older development ends and a new one begins.
Questions:
1. Does the City Council agree that there is a need for major entry point creation? Or
special themes (i.e. tree or shrub plantings) along parkways?
2. Does the City Council agree that time should be spent on establishing distinct
neighborhoods with standards for homes in a given area? (i.e. special zoning districts
created, or review the covenants of new developments).
-5'-
\
CITY OF
NDOVE
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NoW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CLANDOVER.MN.US
RURAL RESERVE PLANNING (Sept. 27, 2005)
o LAKES
In the developrnent of this area, a major amount of soil excavation and land reclamation
will be needed. It is expected that the amount of area dedicated to lakes, ponds and bays in
this developrnent area will be equal in size to the area excavated in the "Lakes" in Blaine.
In that development, 159 acres were excavated (see attached example). These areas will
need to be tied together to act as one large storm water detention pond as well as be a
conduit for the storm water to outlet to Coon Creek and eventually the Rurn River.
Hydrological analysis will be needed to establish 100 year flood elevations and the low
floor elevations for all the future homes in the area. The creation of these lakes will
provide a great amenity that will promote high home values and create a very special feel
to the area. In the Blaine example, 1.4 miles of publicly accessible shoreline was created.
The City Council will need to determine whether Andover should strive to achieve that
level of accessible shoreline and whether the parks that are being planned should have a
public beach area or similar attraction.
Questions:
1. Does the City Council feel that the potential man-made lakes should become a major
focal point and accessible to the most residents of the City, with as much publicly
accessible shoreline as possible?
2. What other man-rnade features should be planned (i.e. stone arch bridges, waterways)?
)
Bridge ConceJ2lli
-6--
"""'"~!!<"i~-__:':'
/
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NoW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5'100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER_MN.US
RURAL RESERVE PLANNING (Sept. 27, 2005)
o COLLECTOR STREETS
The Transportation Plan (approved in 2003) has established that a north-south and two
east-west collector streets will be needed to handle the traffic from the Rural Reserve Area.
There are two issues that will possibly come into play that need to be considered whether
that plan will remain as it is currently proposed:
Bridge crossing at Coon Creek - The wide flood plain and floodway may cause a
bridge crossing to become rather expensive to construct and may cause restrictions and/or
impede the flow of storm water. Staff will investigate whether the bridge is needed and if
the other collector roads can handle the traffic if it is not built. This may require a
remodeling of the traffic model.
Agricultural Preserve Area -- The land owned by Don Eveland has recently been
placed in Agricultural Preserve and may delay an east-west collector street (Andover
Boulevard) from being built to connect with this area. If the road can not be constructed
when the southern half of the Rural Reserve Area is developed, then the proposed road
alignments (on the Transportation Plan) should probably be modified. Without the
Andover Boulevard connection, most of the traffic will use Round Lake Boulevard, with
a portion using Veterans Memorial Boulevard.
Both of these issues will result in changes to the Transportation Plan. Before a final answer
is arrived at, a traffic modeling should probably be conducted to see what effect these two
changes will have on Round Lake Boulevard.
Questions:
1. How does the City Council feel about the proposed bridge crossing at Coon Creek?
2. How does the City Council feel about routing most of the traffic from this area to
Round Lake Boulevard, or down Veterans Memorial Boulevard?
3. Does the City Council agree a new modeling of projected traffic should be done?
I
-7-
"
!
~ ~
~ e
N N
'"
~
ii'j
~
'-'
~
'-
I
J
~ I
~ C\
~
l~
6&
.~ ~
~ 0
l...) ~
~ ~
C')~
~8
c5
u
u
~ 1___
~~~
__Lt).
. .co
LnLn_
-;@
li===yr
""'== :=::::: ::::...
""",-
~
\
/
'yr
II 200
II #200
II @200
II
II
, 888
, C\lC\I~
: 'Il:lSl
16,450
# 1l?,,450
@1 (,850
..i:ftf.' I).....~
'j;- "
-----'1",.:
. I
11_.::
'-'I '!
~~
cOc:C
-~
'\
)
-'-'I('-'~ iI
:,~ ' I
I
'"
P-;~ ._-~~~'c_.,
I' u~ -~!=2~
0:;; .
. .co
Ln""C\I
C\I~@
1-
'\
'\ )
- ~EF61o//ij7W PkJ1AL ~
/J '}
-'/ ZdU PM~ !4cl.
'l
-J'-
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N_W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW_CLANDOVER_MN_US
RURAL RESERVE PLANNING
D PARKS
The park dedication study that was prepared in 2002 has recently been updated to show the
estimated number and types of parks that will be needed to serve the future population ofthe city
and the Rural Reserve Area. Basic assumptions and three tables from that study are shown
below:
TABLE 4
ANDOVER POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD ESTIMATES
POPULATION HOUSEHOLDS
2000 Census 26,588 8,205
2010 Estimate 33,007 12,091
2020 Estimate 39,000 14,516
Rural Reserve Area (5,670) 44,670 (2,100) 16,616
/
The update to the park dedication study will rely on the following demographic statistics. The
City will have a 2020 population of 39,000 people and a 2020 household count of 14,516
according to the City's Comprehensive Plan. The addition of the Rural Reserve Area yields the
following forecasts to population and households:
The Rural Reserve Area has approximately 700 acres of net buildable land for housing, assuming
a density of 3.0 units per acre. This will generate 2,100 new households. At an average of 2.7
people per household, this will result in a build out population of 5,670 people. The Rural
Reserve Area demographic forecasts, in addition to the 2020 forecasts will provide Andover with
a City-wide build out population of 44,670 people and a household count of 16,616.
TABLES
RURAL RESERVE AREA PARK LAND NEEDS
PARK ACRES PER 1,000 POPULATION
/
PARK TYPE NRPA AREA 1 RURAL
STANDARD BUILD OUT RESERVE AREA
POPULATION PARK
(l,OOOs) ACREAGE
NEEDED
Mini .38/1,000 5.6 2 acres
Neighborhood 3/1,000 5.6 17 acres
Community 6.5/1,000 5.6 36 acres
Community 2.25/1 ,000 5.6 13 acres
Playfield
TOTAL 81 acres
-"1--
TABLE 6
/
NUMBER AND TYPE OF PARKS NEEDED FOR POTENTIAL
RURAL RESERVE AREAS
Park Type Park Sizel Rural Reserve Area
# Parks Needed
Mini Park 2 acres 1
Neighborhood Park 18 acres 1
Community Park 40 acres 1
Community Playfield 40 acres 0.3
National Recreation and Park ASSOCIation GUldeltne (average recommended sIze per park type)
The task before you is to determine whether you agree with the acreage and types of mini-park,
neighborhood park and community parks this is showing are needed to serve the roughly 5,600
future residents from the Rural Reserve Area. It is staff's recommendation that the additional
playfield be located at the City Hall/Community Center complex. That still leaves 55 acres of
park that needs to be planned for this new development area.
There are many options to consider, but most important is to plan their location to serve the new
developrnent as well as the existing housing developrnents that have relatively little park area in
their neighborhoods. What may need to be done is to split up the needed parks into three or four
locations so that they are accessible within a short walk or bike ride from anywhere in the new
developrnent area.
/
In the Blaine "Lakes", parks and open space account for 36 percent ofthe site, including lakes,
ponds and linear parkways. Ideally, protected open space such as wetlands, flood plain will be
tied into the park system so that they will be viewed and can be enjoyed by the greatest number
of residents.
Questions:
1. Does the City Council agree with locating the new playfield that is needed (based on the
additional population) at the City Hall Complex?
2. Does the Council agree with the types and acreages shown in the calculations above?
3. Should the City plan for the parks and lakes to be co-located to achieve publicly
accessible shoreline?
. /
-/0-
/
~t--111111 \ fr?
1-1 I I I 1 I I
II I I \\
L II /~r
"I 111\
~EB~ I
[b\ -1-] ~j
( ~ Packer
I - pack:
\ \\
Rural Reserve- Property Owners
~B
/
Ll
-
~
-
Schmitt
Hauglid
'If /
Ih
Him
= - -.:i I I ,'"
[
rIT\
WJ
//
:::::
==
;:::
F
5:
f-
-t---
1// Knoll 1.1 ~ ():::
Fields Fields I Fields ~ 1 ,'j=(]
, ,Ir h ~'H_ f_H- i::~gga ~ ~,~
.;~ n Knoll Fields Fields i Fields I g 0 C::J ~Fr= ~
~\ ~ I ,\ IllllU I ~bJ::; ~
: v / / -~---r~---- ~ x,?) I" I I ~ ~
i~ l.! Fields i Fields Knoll m f-IL.I ~~ I I ;=:
_-.J ~ I I r- ~-i I
- ~ =:b--L K ~ '~'Y- H=H=t--K-1 h :
, ~ ~q: ",", ".. .,,", '" ',;mHlllll!lllB '-' ",., r ;
~ m: ~ 'Om' A'" 'Om' Iii, ~. ~
ROUND & / ?)rn \\\1 W ~lf7f7T ~ V
~KE \\IIIIIIU~II ~
; ~ 'Om' ..~, = ~ ~ ~ ~,III
.tf:/ QUaligi~lack :=:::: r----- / j- II
~ / ~Iyzuk Slyzuk I ~
~ ...." ~1~I<r I r P'
~I SIYZUk~lyzu)f\ L U ~f:I ~ ~ ~
~ \ L- I -"H f"~~ ~ !
1/11. \ ~ ~ ~~~ __,
1II11 ~~'\;j;;~ ~
~w ~E " Major Property Owners
, ~! ~ "" " ~ ijAif D Fields
~r7mTTT@~~m~r~~~~1ffiTIt'-f D Slyzuk
rTTTlllllll11o..y t}) ~~ ,'y ~/\r II Other
rrm:olllllll~~r(l.'1 it==: >/.r-\\" L-J
-
-
L
- 11-
September 27, 2005
/
/
Rural Reseve- Ag Preserve Status
III~ rll
I I I I
I- f-illl
~ f-i II
U III
\'-1 II ~
~8J~ LI ~ I I Ih
~~~ LiWJ H~,I~
f-Y II / &-
~~d--
n I -, - ctJdrl I
~ '~~~
" I I - ,,)';
- I I ~ ;:;~
~ ~ ~E I ;::;:~
I ~ I r-II
JJJrr ,," '.~~" ~d ~
~ EB: ~ .., su~~~ne r
ROUND ~ \\/T1~ ~ v
LAK~ H ~~ =,^ I 'r:=(rd
/~
~ ~~ ........<rT I fTl J 1111 ~ ~ Q
~I ~/ L- - UI ~J mr~ '5J'
11111. ~ ~"I~ ~I
~1 Ed" q~ll~
~ ~ ~~~fHHEffiHHB~~~'.
rrnlEE'(77m7TT0; f:j~~~~l~rT~E!3.~ffi
~ EffiB~ ~5IB ~ W/.-\\ I i"-. ~
~ ffiHElL1.J.( I'/' I I--C:::::: ~0 'i"/ ~ /TITTffi /\
ll-.I I I I I I I
\ W \11
I I ~B
^?-- I )=
I
I
I
,L-
/-1 I
-
]
I~
=s
~
~
I
l II
~ Agricultural Preserve- Expires March 21, 2010
I==:=J Rural Reserve
September 27,2005
- /!:L-
Rural Reserve- Flood Plain and Gas Pipeline
/
I r
"'"
">
~ '"
(~~
'< ~' ,---r
II I
I
~:=EBi
I
r
-'---
v
I ~
I I ,-
- U It ~
J \ ~
VI
I ( ]
~
/' /
~"'~
-
\
/
~
/
--'
\'
- I I
'x~~~
EEf-h9 )~~
""iI
l'o."l\,)'- T I~ ~
Yl<
"" . , U
/'
)<
..;r
'1/ "'<'x
>:;;..< <')(V ,?:>
//Y ;y
Vi), J<vv..<1')(
~~ oJ<..l"
~~ ^'
^,y"
f\ ~ ^'^
~
~1 -;.>'l/'
1'>
'-}
.)< ~ ~ ~~
~ 71;:
/ 0'''' Cf
t~ ,If "
D<>~ -
~/ / ~ I ~ 1(\
">"i;"> III1 II IIII II
~ ;';""\'--111\ 11111111
September 27. 2005
J<
J
I( ~t'>
\"
~
.)<)<.)
::>
:>Yl l' J
h
~f- Hi I
- L- -\' "\
~ T);
\ \
"""" r
""llI_
I
~l- \--\-- ""
III' I H-Y
I'JTIl.; , ~ /'_
I/11lJJ.-.i
VT
r::fI::V{ I--,
------"'-<
L
u
~
.ll. ill IT 'T / L j
I ~j:::<YH r
.1- ",.(..l::
-{'I- ill. I I I I \ I \-
H' 1IIIiTTilll\\\TITT
.~
a._
E\ ~ 1=ffi\Jl] I
~ ~\\ I, riT'\\i\\//
--
-
C'-
~ A5O<:
l'V "'> X:;, ^^^"
x x V'<. J<
IV _ V 'J< ~'"
K:><i "" 'fA .", ""
-f3-
~
...~
Legend
~ Floodplain
.. Gas Pipeline
C=:J Rural Reserve
@
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
CC:
Mayor and Councilmembers ~
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
Will Neumeister, Community Develo ent Director wL
Courtney Bednarz, City Plann4
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Consider Comprehensive Plan AmendmentlRevise Transitional Commercialllndustrial -
Planning.
DATE:
September 27,2005
INTRODUCTION
The Council adopted a resolution eliminating the word industrial from this land use district at the
September 6th Meeting but also requested that this itern be brought to a work session for further
discussion. A summary of the process to this point is provided below. The August 9th Planning
Comrnission Work Session report and the minutes from the two Planning Commission meetings and
Council meeting are attached.
ACTION REOUESTED
The Council is asked to rnake a determination of whether further action is needed on this item and
specifically what is needed.
Backl!round
The Council expressed concern with this land use district and asked the Planning Commission to
review it. The Commission discussed the district to determine whether this designation was
appropriate or whether it created potential for inappropriate land uses. The Planning Commission
suggested that industrial uses be removed from the definition. As a result, a public hearing was held
on August 23rd to consider this amendrnent to the City's Comprehensive Plan.
The Planning Commission discussion on August 23rd included review of the Council approvals
necessary for developrnent to occur. A rezoning would be necessary for any type of commercial
developrnent to occur. Removing this land use designation frorn any ofthe four sites was not
favored. Removing the word industrial from the definition was discussed at length, but ultimately
the Planning Commission recommended no changes to the existing definition with a 6-1 vote. The
minutes from the meetings are attached.
,
,
j
./
Attachments
August 9th Work Session Report j
August 9th Planning Commission Minutes
August 23rd Planning Commission Minutes I
September 6th Council Minutes ,
Cc:
Charles Vieman 13646 Crooked Lake Boulevard
Sterling Homes, Inc. 18593 Vane Ct NW Elk River, MN 55330
Dean and Juliann Hunter 5043 Tuxedo Blvd, Mound, MN 55364
Stan and Judith Carlson 680 Constance Boulevard NW
Grace Lutheran Church 13655 Round Lake Boulevard
Douglas Meister 541 Andover Boulevard
2
,
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
Planning and Zoning Commiss~ers
Courtney Bednarz, City Plann~.
Work Session: Transitional Commercial/Industrial Land Use District Study
August 9, 2005
INTRODUCTION
The Council has asked the Planning Commission to conduct a study of this land use district to
determine whether changes to the Land Use Map are warranted. One ofthe concerns expressed
by the Council is the broad definition of this district and the potential for incompatible land uses.
The purpose of this staff report is to determine if this land use district needs to be revised or
removed from the Comprehensive Plan. Information is also included on each of the four sites
that carry this designation.
Transitional Commercial/Light Industrial (TC) Areas designated as TC, Transitional
Commercial/Light Industrial are currently designated as residential in the Zoning Ordinance, but
may potentially become commercial because oftheir proximity to existing commercial
development or location along a major thoroughfare. Property designated as TC may develop as
either residential or commercial under the rules of the Zoning Ordinance and Land Use Guide
Plan. (Definition from Comprehensive Plan)
DISCUSSION
The location criteria from the definition above could be applied to a vast number of properties
and a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change an existing designation to TC could be applied
for accordingly. Once designated, there are no limitations to rezoning requests that may follow.
As a result, virtually any commercial or industrial use could seek approvals from the City. While
there is merit to preserving appropriate locations for future commercial sites, any such provision
must be lirnited to prevent their premature development and the adverse effects on surrounding
properties and other developing commercial areas in the City.
At a minimum, staff recommends that any reference to industrial be removed from the defmition.
Another option would be to replace the current definition with the one that resembles what is
shown below. A third option would be to remove this land use designation from the
Comprehensive Plan altogether and re-designatethe affected sites.
Transitional Residential/Commercial (TRC): This district is located only within the municipal
urban service area (MUSA) and shall only be applied to sites adjacent to one or more arterial
roadways that are adjacent to an existing commercial site or are a minimum of one mile distant
from existing commercial sites. Rezoning to non residential land uses shall be limited to the
Limited Business (LB) or Neighborhood Business (NB) Zoning Districts and shall also comply
with the following:
1. The proposed commercial development has specified land uses and is not speculative
strip development.
2. The applicant can demonstrate that there is sufficient market demand for the proposed
land use(s).
3. An overall plan for the proposed commercial development demonstrates that the site can
be adequately buffered from surrounding land uses.
-3-
/
4. The proposed commercial development can meet all applicable sections ofthe City Code.
5. The Council fmds that the proposed increase of commercially zoned land will not
adversely affect existing commercial development in the City.
Site Analysis
There are presently four locations in the City guided for Transitional Commercial/Light
Industrial Land Use. Analysis of each location and options for each are provided in this report.
Also attached is a portion of the Land Use Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan containing the
goals and policies that are intended to guide land use decisions. It is also important for the
Planning Commission to consider the existing development pattern within Andover as illustrated
on the attached Land Use Map.
AREA 1: Southeast Corner Crosstown Boulevard & Constance Boulevard
AREA 1: SOUTH EAST C ORNER OF CONSTANCE BOULEVARD AN D CROSSTOWN BOULEYAR D
1--
~ - -
-'/
~~
V/- , . \' I r:\' \ -
- '-- _ h;f
- l:I' I
- E~
-W-I
-
J
I-
~~
~L
I _ -r--- _ - -. _ ,.
I-l r: . r. I I , ~ . i'l
-i~~~ ---~~~~iE". · ~.~. .~
1= ~.~ I, - -...., .
1= 1m . ~ - ~I _~ ro ~ ~ . . I I--
1:::- Iii ~... .:.. _ ni25.? .' I ::
I EE3 I
lI~;-~ ~:.~.~~ ~. >:i.~. - .
.~. \/I~~ ~~\'II ~ - - ~ .
xR ):(< y: I V .:::.l'
--'rl'=>"/ - =-t; ~t"I'~~' r
> ~t?' ~ - . --=---1 :r- .bhbbl;l.. .. ~ ~ "Jj
. . /-/-\-, - I _ ~~
.~
~
, '....2020 MUSA Boundary
N
~E
J
..' ,J
- '1-
DATA
, /
Southeast Corner Crosstown Blvd & Constance Blvd
!# Properties 2
Size 9.25 acres
IIVidth 630 feet
Depth 640 feet
Zoning R-1
Adjacent Development
North Rural Residential (outside MUSA), Church
East Transitional Residential (inside MUSA)
South Urban Residential
lIVest Urban Residential, Church
ANAL YSIS
The site lies within the MUSA Boundary although municipal sewer and water service will not be
available until Miller's Woods is completed. The latest sewer study forecasts that capacity will
be limited to 2.45 units per acre (or 23 units for the 9.25 acres). This will limit the potential for
some types of commercial development.
/
The surrounding neighborhood will continue to develop although land to the north is outside the
MUSA Boundary and will remain rural. Land to the south and ten acres to the east will develop
at an urban residential density with land in the 2005-2020 sewer staging areas.
The site is located at the intersection of two county roads. Crosstown Boulevard is designated a
"B" Minor Arterial and Constance Boulevard is designated a Collector Street in' the City's
Transportation Plan. 16151 Avenue to the west is designated a "B" Minor Arterial in the City's
Transportation Plan. The existing and projected traffic counts from the City's Transportation
Plan indicate daily traffic will be greater at each of the other commercial sites in the City, .with
the exception of the gas/convenience store at the comer of 7th Avenue and Valley Drive.
Changes in access to county roads will need to be permitted by the Anoka County Highway
Department. County spacing guidelines indicate a full movement access would need to be
spaced Yz mile from the intersection of Crosstown Boulevard and Constance Boulevard.
A commercial development would not be successful at this location at the present time. There is
a significant amount of approved retail space within the Hanson Commons and Andover
Clocktower Commons developments that remains to be filled. The site is approximately 1.14
miles from Andover Clocktower Commons. There are also vacant commercial pads with access
to Hanson Boulevard in the Grey Oaks development.
. /
OPTIONS
Staff offers the following options to consider:
OPTION 1: Make no change at this time.
-~--
,
, /
OPTION 2: Change the land use designation to Transitional Residential! Commercial as
described earlier in this report.
OPTION 3: Change the Land Use designation to Transitional Residential to match the
surrounding undeveloped property. Retain the existing R-l Zoning until municipal sewer and
water arrives and urban residential development is proposed. Entertain any proposed
commercial component at that time as a part of an overall development proposal for the
surrounding 18.5 acre parcel.
AREA 2: Northwest Corner Andover Boulevard & Prairie Road
AREA2: NORTHWEST CORNER OF ANDOVER BOULEVARD AND PRAIRIE ROAD
/
, '.,"2020 MUSA Boundary
.
"1-"
J
-(,,'--
DATA
I
Northwest Corner of Andover Blvd & Prairie Road
# Properties 1
Size 4.13 acres
Width 400 feet
Depth 450 feet
Zoning R-1
Adjacent Development
North Transitional Residential (inside MUSA)
East Transitional Residential (inside MUSA)
South Transitional Residential (inside MUSA)
West Transitional Residential (inside MUSA)
ANALYSIS
The site lies within the MUSA Boundary, although municipal sewer and water service will not
be available until development to the south and east occurs. Sewer trunk capacity is limited to
2.45 units per acre (or 10 units for the 4.13 acres) based on the latest sewer study. This will limit
the potential for some types of commercial development.
The surrounding neighborhood will continue to develop although land to the north will continue
to be rural or will not be developed for up to ten years or more according to the Sewer Staging
Plan.
The site is located at the intersection of a county road and a city street. Andover Boulevard is
designated a "B" Minor Arterial and Prairie Road is designated a Collector Street in the City's
Transportation Plan.
The existing and projected traffic counts frorn the City's Transportation Plan indicate daily
traffic will be greater at each ofthe other commercial sites in the City again with the exception of
the gas/convenience store at the corner of 7th Avenue and Valley Drive.
Staff does not believe that a commercial development would be successful at this location at the
present time. There is a significant amount of approved retail space within the Hanson
Commons and Andover Clocktower Commons developments that remains to be filled. There are
also vacant commercial pads with access to Hanson Boulevard in the Grey Oaks development.
The site is less than 1.5 miles frorn either the Andover Clocktower Commons/Hanson Commons
and Andover Station developrnents.
/
OPTIONS
Staff offers the following options to consider:
OPTION 1: Make no change at this time.
-7-
OPTION 2: Change the land use designation to Transitional Residential! Commercial as
described earlier in this report.
OPTION3: Change the Land Use designation to Transitional Residential to match the
surrounding undeveloped property. Retain the existing R-l Zoning until municipal sewer and
water arrives and urban residential development is proposed.
AREA 3: Southwest Corner Bunker Lake Bonlevard & Crooked Lake Boulevard
AREA3: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD AND CROOKED LAKE BOULEVARD
I'~ '2020 M USA Boundary
~E
-$-
DATA
Southwest Corner of Bunker lake Blvd & Crooked lake Blvd
II- Properties 3
Size 3.3 acres (irregular shape)
Width 132 -267 feet
Depth 580-640 feet
Zoning R-4
Adjacent Development
North R-4 Single Family Residential
East R-4 Single Family Residential
South R-4 Single Family Residential
West R-4 Sloth Nursery
ANALYSIS
The site lies within the MUSA and has access to municipal sewer and water. The surrounding
neighborhood has been developed with single family homes with the exception of the Sloth
Nursery to the west and the Meadow Creek Church and school to the northwest.
The site is located at the intersection of a county road and a city street. Bunker Lake Boulevard
is designated an "A" Minor Arterial and Crooked Lake Boulevard is designated as a Collector
Street in the City Transportation Plan.
The existing traffic counts are cornparable to the intersection of Hanson Boulevard and
Crosstown Boulevard. The projected traffic counts show only a minor increase as the
surrounding area is fully developed.
OPTIONS
Staff offers the following options to consider:
OPTION 1: Make no change at this time.
OPTION 2: Change the land use designation to Transitional Residential! Commercial as
described earlier in this report.
OPTION 3: Change the land use designation to Transitional Residential to match the
surrounding undeveloped property. . Evaluate low or medium density development proposals
through the sketch plan process.
OPTION 4: Change the land use designation to Limited CommerciallMedium Density to allow
for either office or medium density development as was done for site that was developed as
Bunker Lake Village.
OPTION 5: Change the land use designation Neighborhood Commercial to allow the potential
for more retail and restaurant types of uses.
-7--
AREA 4: Southeast Corner of Round Lake Boulevard and Bunker Lake Boulevard
AREA4: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD AND BUNKER lAKE BOULEVARD
1'..'2020 MUSA Boundary
H
~E
I
-/~-
DATA
Southeast corner of Round Lake Blvd and Bunker Lake Blvd
If- Properties 2
Size 4.1 acres
Width 270 feet
Depth 660 feet
Zoning R-4
Adjacent Development
North SC - Downtown Center
East NB - Office Building
South R-4 - Single Family
West SC - CVS, Precision Tune, Anoka strip center
Other factors Existing church is likely to remain for the long term
ANALYSIS
The site lies within the MUSA and has access to municipal sewer and water. Property to the
west, north and east has been developed with commercial land uses and property to the south is a
single family neighborhood.
The site is located at the intersection of two county roads. Both Round Lake Boulevard and
Bunker Lake Boulevard are classified as county road and a city street. Bunker Lake Boulevard
is designated an "A" Minor Arterial and Crooked Lake Boulevard is designated as a Collector
Street in the City Transportation Plan.
The site has been developed with the Grace Lutheran Church and a parking area that serves the
church. It is not considered likely that the site will be developed for any other use at this time.
In this case, the revised definition of Transitional Residential/Commercial may be appropriate
because it preserves the residential classification that churches need according to local zoning
requirements and also preserves the potential for future commercial development if the church
decides to rnove to another site.
OPTIONS
Staff offers the following options to consider:
OPTION 1: Make no change at this time.
OPTION 2: Change the land use designation to Transitional Residential/ Commercial as
described earlier in this report.
,I
-1/-
ACTION REQUESTED
Please review and discuss the attached information and consider any input from property owners.
If it is determined that changes to the Cornprehensive Plan need to be rnade, a public hearing will
be scheduled pursuant to that process.
Respectfully submitted,
4~
Attachments
Excerpts from the Land Use Chapter ofthe Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Map
Cc:
Charles Vieman 13646 Crooked Lake Boulevard
Sterling Homes, Inc. 18593 Vane Ct NW Elk River, MN 55330
Dean and Juliano Hunter 5043 Tuxedo Blvd, Mound, MN 55364
Stan and Judith Carlson 680 Constance Boulevard NW
Grace Lutheran Church 13655 Round Lake Boulevard
Douglas Meister 541 Andover Boulevard
/
/
-/z __
. I
A.
/
Excerpt From Comprehensive Plan
The information below is taken from the Land Use Chapter of the City's Comprehensive
Plan. Description of the transitional land use districts and the goals and policies that are
intended to guide the decision making process are included below.
3. Local Goals and Objectives
Goals and objectives translate the general land use vision statements of Andover
citizens into policies for future land use decisions. Goals are the most general
statements of the plan, objectives are means of achieving the goals.
Goal 1 : Maintain a high degree of community planning and involvement
Objectives:
B.
Establish a community focal point of land uses including schools, civic functions,
recreational opportunities and medical services in the vicinity of City Hall.
Maintain a close working relationship with local civic, school and governmental
agencies to ensure that the needs of all parties are considered when broader
decisions that affect Andover residents are made.
Recognize and plan for anticipated growth and demographic changes.
Encourage commercial development at major intersections along major
thoroughfares and discourage strip development away from these locations.
Encourage development of community facilities for meetings, recreation and
other public needs in conjunction with other public entities such as school
districts and Anoka County.
Create opportunities for higher density development in the Commercial Park
area.
Provide opportunities for life-cycle housing choices.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
Goal 2:
Allow growth while maintaining the quality of natural resources and
amenities.
Objectives:
A. Encourage infill development within the existing MUSA.
B. Promote, protect, preserve and enhance residential, agricultural and open space
in Andover through implementation of land use ordinances.
C. Promote orderly growth to ensure efficient utilization and delivery of
community services.
D. Develop pedestrian walkways, trails and obtain rights-of-way throughout the City.
E. Allow extension of infrastructure consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
F. Limit urban development to only those areas serviceable by sanitary sewer within
the 2020 MUSA Boundary depicted on Figure 4.5.
G. Create opportunities for the City to acquire larger tracts of land to provide further
green space and meet other civic needs.
H. Identify potential future areas for higher density development within the urban
service area.
I. Protect direct access to sunlight for solar energy systems.
Goal 3: Encourage appropriate economic growth, and redevelopment.
Objectives:
-13 -
A. Develop a diversified tax base through balanced development of commercial,
light industrial, and residential properties. .
8. Minimize potential zoning and land use conflicts by providing transitional zones
or buffers between commercial, light industrial and residential activity and review
regularly.
C. Allow limited commercial growth to serve residential areas outside the urban
service area.
D. Allow light industrial growth only within the urban service area.
E. Promote redevelopment of 'brown field' properties.
Goal 4: Plan for the externalities of future growth
Objectives:
A. The following issues shall be part of the review process prior to any rezoning or
Comprehensive Plan Amendment:
. Roads and Traffic
. Sewer and Water
. Schools
. Parks
. Engineering\lnspections
. Fire
. Police
. Fiscal impact
The capacity to meet these identified needs shall be a determining factor for
approval.
B. Explore opportunities to preserve and protect open space through the
development process.
C. Study the possibility of a potential commuter railroad and/or mass transit station.
D. Cluster open space and recreation areas for multiple uses.
E. Study the need for railroad grade translocation to meet safety needs.
Goal 5:
Establish, maintain, and improve vital retail and service
locations within Andover.
I
Objectives:
A. Promote development of commercial areas as cohesive, highly-inter-
related nodes responsive to the needs of the community and surrounding
market area.
B. Focus on new development and redevelopment efforts of general
commercial areas to create site designs that promote attractive shopping
environments, easy accessibility, and a high level of business interchange.
1This goal and underlying objectives were added as a result of the Neighborhood Business
study conducted in 2001-02.
C. Strongly discourage any fragmented or uncoordinated linear commercial
development in favor of a unified and pre-planned development pattern.
D. Select strategic locations for neighborhood commercial sites and establish
design performance standards for such uses that promote quality site
design and compatible land use arrangements.
E. In evaluating commercial sites, consideration shall be given to the physical
implication of commercial use related to compatibility with surrounding
land uses, traffic generation, sewer and water demands, and
environmental issues.
-iL/;-
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - August 9, 2005
Page 6
WORK SESSION: TRANSITIONAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL LAND USE
DISTRICT STUDY
Mr. Bednarz stated the Council has asked the Planning Commission to conduct a study of
this land use district to determine whether changes to the Land Use Map are warranted.
One of the concerns expressed by the Council is the broad definition of this district and
the potential for incompatible land uses.
Mr. Bednarz discussed the information with the Commission.
Mr. Stan Carlson, 680 Constance Boulevard, stated he would rather have the definition
left as it is if possible.
Mr. Doug Meister, 541 Andover Boulevard, stated he is in agreement with Mr. Carlson
and he did not see anything wrong with this. He stated that by changing the ordinances,
it seerned to hirn that the City would be getting rnore control of their property in order to
dictate what could eventually go in to the site. He stated this is not necessary because
proposals would need to be reviewed by the Cornmission and Council anyway.
Mrs. Judy Carlson, 680 Constance Boulevard, stated she would like this to be changed
and would like their property to be residential and not transitional.
Mr. Carlson stated one of his wife's fears is what the City can do with their property
since it has the connotation of being commercial/transitional. The way he understands it
is that this is just a possibility that if they sell, it could be used as transitional.
Mr. Dean Hunter, 2856 Bunker Lake Blvd. NW, wondered ifthis goes through, can you
no longer put residential on the property. Chairperson Daninger stated they can still put
residential on the property but this allows more options.
Commissioner Jasper stated the way it reads now is they have residential and a wide
option of commercial options there. The proposals they are seeing would still allow
residential but lirnited comrnercial options. He did not think it was being proposed that
the residential option be removed.
Commissioner Kirchoff thought they were deciding if they wanted to eliminate industrial
from the definition. Mr. Bednarz stated that was correct.
Mr. Meister stated he has a problem with limiting the property owners' use of his
property in the future. He thought having options was good and by changing this they are
allowing the City to decide what the property will be allowed to have in the future.
Cornmissioner Holthus asked for a clarification between land use and zoning. Mr.
Bednarz clarified the two for the residents and Commission.
. /
-/~-
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - August 9, 2005
Page 7
Chairperson Daninger wondered when the properties changed to this designation. Mr.
Bednarz stated this designation was officially adopted with the City's Comprehensive
Plan update in December 2001. A lot of the discussion began in 1998 with the entire
Compo Plan.
Commissioner Greenwald thought this discussion came up with the Crooked
LakeIBunker issue they reviewed a month ago. He stated it was his opinion that he has
not seen significant changes in these four areas other than the Constance/Crosstown area.
He thought it was good to discuss but did not see a need for the change right now. He
stated each area was unique and thought each area should be looked at further
individually.
Commissioner Greenwald thought the two he saw significant change with was the
Crooked Lake/Bunker area and the one on Crosstown/Constance.
Chairperson Daninger thought it was interesting that four meetings ago, they had a room
full of people concerned with what was going in at Crooked Lake and Bunker and
wishing for a change and tonight there are a handful of people at the meeting who do not
want to change the designations.
I
Cornmissioner Holthus stated she was curious about how other cities handled transitional
areas, if they even had any, so she did some research and found that rnost cities reviewed
do not have transitional uses. She showed surrounding areas zoning maps to the
Commission.
Commissioner Holthus wondered why they even have transitional uses in the City.
Chairperson Daninger stated if they took the designation away, should it go back to what
it was previously.
Commissioner Holthus wondered what the logic was for this type of designation in the
areas. Was it to spur cornmercial development in those areas. Mr. Bednarz stated if the
motives were that precise, they were not reflected in the discussion when this district was
created. He believed that the location of undeveloped property near the intersection of
County roads was a significant factor.
Commissioner Jasper thought this was much ado about nothing. This is a Cornp. Plan
designation. The sites are all zoned residential. If sorneone wants to do a commercial or
industrial project, they must first meet the standards for rezoning and then approval for
the business or the development. He thought whatever protections they need are there
without making a change. He agreed with the residents and did not think they should
change anything.
/
Commissioner Greenwald agreed they should leave these alone but thought they should
have discussions on each area individually because each one is unique.
-~-
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - August 9, 2005
Page 8
Chairperson Daninger stated according to their notes, option one on all of them is to
make no changes at this time. The action requested is to discuss the information and take
input from residents and determine ifthere needed to be a change to the Compo Plan and
if so a public hearing will follow. He wondered if there was a consensus to leave these
alone.
Commissioner Vatne concurred with staff to remove the light industrial. He stated he has
concerns about one of the two light industrial districts they have because they have set up
the Rural Reserve with upcoming residential development which is going to be adjacent
to it and he did not think that was an appropriate way to layout the plans of the City. He
stated three of the four sites have residential up against them. He stated light industrial
with residential does not seem like an appropriate use to him.
Chairperson Daninger concurred with Commissioner Vatne. He thought this was more
area specific.
Cornmissioner Greenwald thought they should have a public hearing and then determine
if it needed to be changed.
Consensus of the Commission was to recommend changing the definition based on
discussion in order to have a public hearing.
(
Further Review of Revision #37 and #48 Concerning Home Occupations
This particular s ion has been in conflict with l2-l4-l0C.3, 4 & 5 and staff would like
it to be consistent. roposed change is to move l2-6-6A to become l2-l4-l0C.2.C
and eliminate 12-6-6 an -14-IOC.5.
Mr. Bednarz reviewed the City Co cil concerns and questions with the Commission.
Commissioner Vatne wondered how you co 01 what a garage can be used for. He
wondered if this had an impact on what they dec' e and recommend. He thought it did.
They are going into some very grey areas on what pe Ie use their homes for. He stated
more people are using their homes for business these day nd this is going to become
more of what people are doing so he had concerns with puttin ontrol on what can be
done.
I
Commissioner Kirchoff concurred because there are so many things being e in a
home and he did not know what was wrong with that. He indicated people ca t park
their cars in the garages that have a lot stuff in their garage that is not business relat
he did not know what the difference is.
-/7--
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes -August 23,2005
Page 7
PUBLIC HEARING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (05-01) TO
REMOVE THE WORDS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FROM THE DEFINITION OF THE
TRANSITIONAL COMMERCIAVLIGHT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE DISTRICT.
Mr. Bednarz stated at the Council's request, the Planning Commission discussed the
Transitional Commercial/Light Industrial District to determine whether this designation
was appropriate or whether it created potential for inappropriate land uses. This
designation affects four sites in Andover.
Commissioner Greenwald stated the last time they discussed this, they asked for
definitions. He wondered what light industrial meant. Mr. Bednarz explained to the
Commission examples of businesses that would be considered light industrial.
Commissioner Greenwald wondered if commercial would be considered retail, office
warehouses, and gases. He wondered where funeral homes would be. Mr. Bednarz
stated funeral homes would be considered if they could be rezoned to either general
business or light industrial, which they are proposing to eliminate.
Chairperson Daninger stated it did not mean it had to be commercial, residential housing
could be put on the lots. Mr. Bednarz agreed.
/
Commissioner Kirchoff wondered if high density housing could be built in those areas.
Mr. Bednarz stated potentially they could seek a rezoning to any district as the definition
currently is written.
Commissioner Kirchoff wondered if any use would require rezoning. Mr. Bednarz stated
there are four sites, each with single family rural or urban residential zoning. He thought
future proposals would require rezoning.
Motion by Greenwald, seconded by Casey, to open the public hearing at 8:05 p.m.
Motion carried on a 7-ayes, O-nays, O-absent vote.
Ms. Marnell Wilbur, 136th Lane, wondered what this will do as far as church rezoning.
She stated she did not want to see the zoning for the church to change and end up with a
shopping center in their backyards.
Mr. Bednarz explained what could happen if the church on Bunker and Round Lake
Boulevard left. He indicated the recommendation is to remove the potential for industrial
developrnent of these areas.
Mr. Kent Meister, 541 Andover Boulevard, stated he thought this was premature. He
read a letter he prepared to the Commission stating his objections.
Mr. Stan Carlson, 680 Constance Boulevard, stated he would like to leave the definition
the way it is.
-'10-
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - August 23, 2005
Page 8
Mr. Derek Dieshel, 16030 Quinn Street, asked for clarification on this item. He
wondered if anything was proposed to be coming in on the properties being discussed.
Mr. Bednarz stated there was not.
Ms. Jean Jurassic, 13563 Crooked Lake Boulevard, stated when they received
notification ofthe funeral home, very few people were notified. She wondered how
many people are actually notified ofthe public hearings. Mr. Bednarz explained the
process the City uses to notify residents of items that would affect them.
Mr. Scott Berm, 3433 136th Avenue, asked what the definition oflight industrial was.
Mr. Bednarz explained what businesses were considered light industrial.
Mr. Berm stated ifthey change the words, it will depreciate their property. There could
be more trucks and more trash and eventually the homes around an industrial area will
look bad. Chairperson Daninger stated they want to make this more restrictive and
possibility eliminating light industrial from the zoning.
Mr. Doug Meister, 541 Andover Boulevard, stated with gas going up and people having
to commute to their work, he thought Andover would want to add more industrial and
businesses to allow people to work within their city. He hoped in the future, they could
have more businesses and more industry in the City.
Ms. Wilbur stated if they want to change the zoning where the church is on Bunker and
Round Lake Boulevard, why would it need to have a new rezoning; being it has an
existing structure. Chairperson Daninger stated the property is what they are looking at,
not the existing structure.
Mr. Rodney Lund, 13713 Edelweiss Street, wondered what is driving this change. He
wondered what the advantages or disadvantages are. Chairperson Daninger stated they
were guided by the Council to review this for changes. Mr. Bednarz stated part of the
Councils initial concern was the size of some of these undeveloped sites and their
location adjacent to single family neighborhoods and how difficult it would be to provide
an industrial use and provide adequate buffering.
Ms. Gloria Benjamin, 13625 Gladiola St., wondered why it cannot be zoned residential
only. Chairperson Daninger stated this is not saying residential cannot go there but this
would give more options for development.
Mr. Carlson stated he was in favor of what the Commission is trying to do because the
site they have could end up to be a substantial business that would bring a lot of jobs into
the City.
Mrs. Judy Carlson stated she would like the site at the southeast corner of Crosstown
Boulevard and Constance Boulevard to be residential.
-J7~
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - August 23, 2005
Page 9
Mr. Art Steimer, 13562 Crooked Lake Boulevard, stated even if they drop the light
industrial, anyone can make an application to change this back. Chairperson Daninger
stated that was correct.
Motion by Greenwald, seconded by Casey, to close the public hearing at 8:35 p.m.
Motion carried on a 7-ayes, O-nays, O-absent vote.
Commissioner Kirchoff explained what the Commission is trying to do.
Commissioner Jasper stated he wanted to make sure it is clear that there was an original
proposal regarding not allowing speculative development and development that is in
competition with other properties. His understanding is that has not moved forward
because he would oppose that. He stated Mr. Meister talked about preserving options and
they need a more diverse tax base and they do need rnore ernployment in this City. He
stated this is a Comprehensive Plan Amendrnent and nothing else. He noted that right
now the Comprehensive Plan stated that these properties are all zoned residential and it
allows an option for someone to apply for a rezoning to commercial or industrial. It does
not say that such a rezoning would be approved; it would still have to go through the
whole process. He stated even if they change this and take away the light industrial,
someone could come in and apply to have it rezoned as industrial. He stated he would
not change anything. He thought there was an assumption that light industrial is a more
intense and intrusive area of development which is not necessarily true. He stated the
words may intirnidate some people more than the reality but he thought they were doing
something that is taking away from four particular properties, possibilities in the future
that does not have much impact. He stated he would leave it as is and would not affect
those options. He noted that each and everyone of the properties is already zoned
residential. Chairperson Daninger stated they were designated for future change.
Commissioner Greenwald concurred.
The Commission discussed what light industrial meant and what could be built there.
Commissioner Vatne stated the Comprehensive Plan gives an indication of where the
City would like to go, it is an indicator of what the City wants to see come into the City.
He thought it was appropriate to drop the industrial zoning as proposed.
Commissioner Greenwald thought they needed to keep the options open because they
seem to be regulating rnore things all of the time.
Commissioner Jasper stated he would like to leave the definition as is. Commissioner
Vatne thought the light industrial should be removed.
Commissioner Greenwald stated he would like to leave it in. Chairperson Daninger
stated he would like to remove it. Commissioner Kirchoff indicated he would like to
remove it. Commissioner Casey stated he would like to leave it in. Commissioner
-~~
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - August 23, 2005
Page 10
Kirchoff explained the reasons why he wanted to have it removed. He looked at it as a
guide for transitional areas. Commissioner Holthus stated she would like to rernove this
for good Comprehensive planning. She did not think this piecemeal was good planning.
Commissioner Greenwald stated they will never have major industrial development in the
City because they do not have main roadway access.
Mr. Bednarz reviewed what types of businesses are allowed in light industrial zoning.
Motion by Greenwald, seconded by Casey, to leave this as traditional business/light
industrial and to leave it as is.
Commissioner Vatne stated as a result of this, he thought there needed to be a look at the
difference between commercial and light industrial and the definitions they have in the
table because he did not think it was appropriate and did not point out some ofthe
specific industries they have talked about.
Motion carried on a 6-ayes, I-nays (Daninger), O-absent vote.
Mr. Bednarz stated that this item would be before the Council at the September 6, 2005
City Council meeting.
-2/-
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - September 6, 2005
Page 7
CONSIDER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REVISE TRANSITIONAL
COMMERCIAVINDUSTRIAL
Cornmunity Development Director Neumeister stated this designation affects four sites in Andover.
Mr. Neumeister discussed the staff report with the Council.
Councilmember Jacobson wondered what types of businesses would be included in light industrial.
Mr. Neumeister indicated he would put together a list for the Council.
Councilmember Orttel noted Beberg Nursery is an example of light industrial.
Councilmernber Jacobson stated his concern is if they left it as is and someone came in with a
proposal which the Council did not like, how would they be able to deny it. Councilmember Orttel
stated this happened on Bunker and Crosstown which they were able to deny but if it is zoned he did
not think they had the latitude to deny it.
Mr. Neumeister showed the Council what type of businesses would be light industrial.
The City Attorney explained the zoning and what the City Council would have to do to deny a
request.
Councilmember Knight thought this was very confusing and would rather this be sornething
someone would have to apply for rather than be a given.
Mayor Gamache thought there was a reason for the change when it was done.
Councilmember Trude thought the only way they could protect the neighbors was to change them all
back to residential.
The Council discussed the reasons for removing Light Industrial from the zoning in the four areas.
Motion by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, to remove the term "Light Industrial" from the definition
of the Transitional Cornmercial/Light Industrial Land Use District as represented in the attached
resolution.
Councilmember Knight thought they should discuss this further at a workshop meeting. <
Councilmember Trude wondered ifthis is passed, does staff have to bring it directly to Met Council.
Councilmember Jacobson thought staff would need Council authorization in order to bring this to
the Met Council for changes. .
;
Councilmember Orttel did not think this was an issue at all.
Motion carried unanimously. (Resolution R154-05)
~ 2-Z-- -
,
/
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NoW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
Mayor and Councilmembers ~
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
Will Neumeister, Comrnunity Developrnen ir ctor
Courtney Bednarz, City Plann4
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT: Consider Various Code Revisions, Continued - Planning
DATE: September 27,2005
INTRODUCTION
Please find attached the City Code iterns that were tabled by the Council for work session
discussion.
DISCUSSION
Please review the attached items.
ACTION REQUESTED
Please determine ifthese items need further revision.
I
Attachments
Proposed Revision #32
Proposed Revision #52
Proposed Revision #68
Proposed Revision #81
Proposed Revision #82
(!)
,
J
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NoW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
MAIN (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
CC:
Mayor and Councilmembers D
Jim Dickinson, City Adrninistrat~
Will Neumeister, Community Development Director td--
Andy Cross, Associate Planner $'--
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Revision # 32 - SC Zoning District
DATE:
September 27,2005
INTRODUCTION
The City Council reviewed Code Revision #32 and agreed to examine it further before adopting
it. This revision proposes the deletion of section 12-4-12 of the City Code, which identifies
requirements for the application and review of and structures in the SC or NB zoning district.
The chapter also outlines several standards for development in an SC districts.
/
DISCUSSION
City Code Chapter 12-4-12 is unique because it is the only chapter in the Code that sets standards
for application, review, and development in a particular zoning district. No other zoning districts
are given such individual attention. Instead, standards for other districts are provided in Chapter
12-3-4. Because zoning district standards are provided in 12-3-4, they do not need to appear for
(SC) Shopping Center in this special chapter 12-4-12.
Additionally, the contents of 12-4-12 are already covered in other parts of the City Code or the
Cornmercial Site Plan review process. Part B outlines standard elements of any Commercial Site
Plan required with any application. Part D requires a minimum lot size for the NB and SC
zoning districts. If the council feels these minimum lot sizes are important for the SC district,
then they should be included in Chapter 12-3-4, "Minimum District Requirements" with the lot
size requirements of all the other zoning districts. Part E applies to areas zoned "SC" that do not
have definite boundaries. There are no properties in Andover zoned SC that do not have definite
boundaries, so this part is unnecessary.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
::nd~ ~s~
Attachments
Revision #32
Revision #16
12-3-4 Minimum District Requirernents
/
Revision # 32
12-4-12 SHOPPING CENTER LOCATION REQUIREMENTS
Backl!round
This section is outdated. Many of the requirernents outlined here are standard elements
of a Commercial Site Plan review and do not need their own section in the City Code.
This chapter describes requirernents for the SC Zoning District. These requirements
belong in chapter 12-3, "Zoning Districts."
If the Council decides that some of the other requirements are useful, then those
requirements can be placed elsewhere in the Code.
ProDosed Chanl!e
Strike this section of the code. Other requirements and changes in the SC zoning district
are handled in Revision #16.
12 1 12: SHOPPINC CENTERS
.^.ny new structures in a shopping center (SC) or neighborhood business (NB) district
must be shown to fit into an overall plan for the shopping center. Before any new area is
zoned, the following conditions must be met:
.^.. The c.rrea will be located adjacent to a thoroughfare or collector street as shovfl1 on the
comprehensive plan or as indicated as a potential shopping center site or
neighborhood business site on such plan.
B. Submission of a plot plan showing structures, parking, dri'ieviays, landscaping and
screenmg.
C. If construction has not begun '.vithin tv/enty fDur (21) months, or if the project is not
fifty percent (50%) completed within fi'ie (5) years, any further development of any
type shall require a conditional use permit, and the plar.ning and zoning commission
may move to initiate a rezoning back to that in effect prior to neighborhood business
(NB) or shopping center (SC) zoning.
D. The area zoned shall include at least two (2) acres for neighborhood business (NB)
and fi'ie (5) acres for shopping center (SC).
E. Any area noted on the zoning map as "SC" with no definite boundc.rry shall be
administered as fDllows:
1. Only one comer of any major road intersection may be zoned for a shopping center (SC) at
anyone time.
2. TIle landowner shall submit a plan in aeeerdance with the provisi0ns of a planned unit
development w"",
3. The city couflcil may grant or dellY the request for busilless zOllillI; based UpOIl the plans
submitted. .
4. A marl;et feasibility study shall be submitted to illdicate Ileed, size alld future size.
V.mended Ord. &, 10 21 1970)
-2--
Revision # 16
12-3-2, 12-3-3 ZONING DISTRICT NAMES & DESCRIPTIONS
Backl!:round
The descriptions of the zoning districts are not as accurate and complete as they should
be.
Proposed Chanl!:e
The title "Purpose of Each District" will be changed to "Description of Each District."
The district descriptions will be updated with specific language including location
requirements scattered in other sections and the general range of activity that is allowed
to help guide rezoning decisions. In addition, the names of the districts will be updated to
more accurately describe what the districts are intended for.
12-3-2: ZONING DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED:
For the purposes of this title, the city is hereby divided into the following zoning districts:
ZONING DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED:
Symbol Name
R-1 Single bmily ru r::J I (low density)
R-2 Single bmily est3te (low density)
R-3 Single bmily suburb::Jn (medium density)
R-4 Single bmily urb::Jn
R-5
M-1 Multiple dwelling fmedium-density~
M-2
AgP Agricultural preserve (o'/erl::JY district)
GR
LB
NB
SC
GB
I
SinQle Family Rural Residential
SinQle Family Residential Estate
SinQle Family Suburban Residential
SinQle Family Urban Residential
Manufactured Housing
Multiple DwellinQ Medium Density
Multiple Dwelling
AQricultural Preserve
General Recreation
Limited Business
Neighborhood Business
Shopping Center
General Business
Industrial
12-3-3: PURPOSE OF EACH DISTRICT DESCRIPTION OF EACH
DISTRICT:
A. R-l Single Family Rural District: SinQle Family Rural Residential:
)
This district is intended to provide a residential atmosphere for those persons desiring
to retain a large parcel of land. Such large lots are logical in areas where development
-J-
\
)
into srnaller lots would be difficult, or where public utilities will not be available in
the foreseeable future. Furthermore, larger houses are more costly and require larger
lots. Thus, to provide an area to accommodate those persons with the financial means
to erect a large house, it is necessary to have an area of large lots.
2. Land which is wooded, or which has a changing topography, and low land which
tends to be poor agriculturally is also the most expensive to develop for residential
sites and, after development, the sites tend to be expensive to maintain. Such areas are
the most interesting and most susceptible to large lot development. The district also is
intended to preserve productive land for agricultural use.
B. R-2 Single Family Estate District: Sinqle Family Residential Estate: This district is
intended to provide a residential atmosphere for those persons desiring a single-
family neighborhood with a suburban density. The areas may be transitional ones set
aside for various lot sizcs to assure a wide selection of building sites and
resubdi'iision at a later date. /\. density as proposed may pcrmit econornical
installation of sewcr and water at a later date. Lots in this district created after
1978 and without City sewer and water must be at least 2.5 acres. This zoning
district was used for rural residential developments prior to 1978.
\
/
C. R-3 Single Family Suburban District: Sinqle Family Suburban Residential: This
particular district is intended to satisfy those persons who prefer a rnedium sized lot.
Lots in this district created after 1978 and without City sewer and water must be
at least 2.5 acres. This zoning district was used for rural residential
developments prior to 1978.
D. R-4 Single Family Urban District: Sinqle Family Urban Residential: This district
represents urban density use by single-family detached dwellings.
E. R-5 Manufactured Housing District: This district would permit all types of
manufactured housing including manufactured homes and modular houses, provided
public sewer and water is provided. (Arnended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970)
F. M-l Multiple Dwelling District: Multiple Dwellinq Medium Density: This district is
intended to provide a location for medium density attached dwelling units
(townhouses) with private entrances. These areas may be transitional, however, the
townhouse resident should have convenient access to all facilities provided for single-
farnily neighborhoods. This district's location shall provide sufficient space for
buffering from less intense uses. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970; amd. 2003 Code)
\
/
G. M-2 Multiple Dwelling District: This district is intended to provide a location for all
types of multiple dwellings. This district's location shall have convenient access to
all facilities provided for neighborhoods, open space, and buffering from less
intense uses. Access to an M-2 district shall be from a collector or arterial
roadwav.
~ '1--
H. GR General Recreation District: This district is intended to provide a location for all
types of commercial recreation uses such as golf driving ranges, outdoor theaters,
racetracks, and snowmobile areas, rnost of which require large amounts ofland and
good separation from residential areas. This district's location shall provide
sufficient space for buffering from less intense uses.
I. LB Limited Business District: This district is suitable only for commercial uses of a
limited (less intense) nature. This may be due to the close proximity of residential
uses. The LB district can be used as a transitional district or buffer between
noncompatible uses such as intense commercial (GB) and low density residential
uses. This district's location shall provide sufficient space for buffering from less
intense uses.
J. NB Neighborhood Business District: This district is used for retail sales and services
in such scale as to serve the surrounding neighborhood needs. Locations for
Neighborhood Business districts are typically small plots in close proximity to or
surrounded by residential areas. NB zoning districts do not require frontage on
an arterial roadway and can be served by local and collector streets. However,
this district shall not be served exclusively by local streets. This district's
location shall provide sufficient space for buffering from less intense uses.
/
K. SC Shopping Center District: This zoning classification is reserved for modern retail
shopping facilities of integrated design in appropriate locations. Normally this zoning
classification will not be given to specific undeveloped land parcels; rather, the
general location of potential shopping center sites will be indicated on the
comprehensive plan. This '-",ill allow potential developers greater freedom in site
selection and reduce the possibility of under or over zoning for commercial
development. Potential shopping center sites should be zoned after there is actual
need shown, and construction ofthe center can be expected within t',vo (2) years
following such zoning. Locations for the SC district are larger plots that can
accommodate more intensive retail development. Access shall be available from
arterial roadways. This district's location shall provide sufficient space for
buffering from less intense uses.
L. GB General Business District: These are areas containing a wide variety of business
uses including retail, service and semi-industrial. As such, they may contain
businesses which tend to serve other business and industry as well as those catering to
shopper needs.
M. I Industrial District: These are areas that have the prerequisites for industrial
development, but because of proximity to residential areas or the need to protect
certain areas or uses from adverse influences, high development standards will be
necessary. I district uses include service industries and industries which manufacture,
fabricate, assemble or store, where the process is not likely to create offensive noise,
vibrations, dust, heat, srnoke, odor, glare or other objectionable influences. Generally,
those include wholesale, service and light industries which are dependent upon raw
->-
rnaterials refined elsewhere. An industrial "park" which maintains high development
standards would be zoned I. This district's location shall provide sufficient space
for bufferinl! from less intense uses. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970)
\
/
-,-
/
~)~
o~
~
,'>0
1-'0
~z
'\
)
r:I'1
E-<
Z
r.ol
~
~
....
P
01
~
E-<
U
~
E-<
r:I'1
....
~
~
p
~
....
z
....
~
'<t
,
M
,
N
-
lD
Cl
u
en
lD
Z
lD
..J
c::
Cl
N
::;;
~
::;;
on
c::
....
c::
'"
c::
N
c::
;;:
en
[!!
<)
III
~
N
en
Q)
~
<)
ro
It'l
N
en
Q)
~
<)
ro
It'l
N
en
Q)
'fi 8
-::. .s::
:!: ~
5 'E
ro
.~ ~
~
Q)
~
'0
....
2i
CO
Q)
....
CO
-
o
-.J
o
o
L!)_
L!)
o
o
"t
......
......
o 0
o 0
o 0
L!) L!)
o 0
o 0
oq
'<t L!)
o 0
o 0
o 0
(0 (0
o
o
o
o
N
Q)
....
u
CO
......
~oo
.Et::
Q)I'-
.0
-
'00
Q)~
1il
OJ
~
<)
en
-0
=
~~-:~.~-:--
E .s:: en ::J ::J ....,
o (J C C C ~
..c.s...Q)<D~
.!: ro 'c E E c:
:;;: ~ ::J t: t: ::J
_._~roco~
~~~ggc:
E";'roEEw~
~Q)~oo:;:
,-..rooO'O
IDC'(5-oUL..
'2U5=1l1l2i
~ (/} I I
C 'r""" N C'C
Q) Q)
E ro
t: ....
~ 0
<i. ..Q
LL
en
Q)
E
o
.s::
~
'E
-1
~
000 0
(0 (0 0 L!)
OJ OJ r-- ......
o 0
(0 (0
OJ OJ
o
(0
OJ
o
(0
OJ
o
(0
OJ
o
o
N
......
o
(0
OJ
~ -g '~5~
E .s:: ::J,g c
o ~ C .....~
~15~~
]~t:c
.- III Q)
~ ~ g E
'E ";' E ~
~ (l) 8 ~
~g-orn
g (j) 1l 5
en ~ ~
'0
ro
.s::
<)
III
UJ
en
Q)
E
o
.s::
~
'E
~
,
-1-
o
o
......
o
o
......
o
o
N
o
L!)
......
o
o
......
o
N
......
o
L!)
......
o
L!)
......
o
CO
o
L!)
......
'"
.,;
o
o
o
'"
'"
o
L!)
......
'"
.,;
o
o
o
o
'"
o
L!)
......
'"
.,;
o
o
o
o
'"
o
L!)
......
'"
.,;
o
o
'"
'"
N
L!)
(")
......
'"
.,;
o
o
o
o
'"
L!)
(")
......
'"
.,;
o
o
o
o
'"
o ~ ~
L():~g
...... 0 0
'" 0
'" '"
~
o a ';i
LO:~g
...... 0 0
'" 0
N '"
-1:
"-
:g
o
'"
'"
o 0
(") '<t
...... '<t
'"
.,;
o
o
o
o
N
000 0
o 0 L!) '<t
('l") ..- T""'" 'I:;j"
'"
.,;
o
o
o
o
'"
OL!)OO
o (0 L!) '<t
(Y) T""'" T'"" -.:::t
Q)
~
<)
ro
o
o
(")
<=
Q)
Q)
~
Q)
c:
~
-'" .E
<) Q)
ro .0
.0 '0
Q) Q)
(/J en 10
5 c t5 =
"00 e en ~
C ~ 0 ~
Q) .s:: E .s::
Ei5i59
o OJ: 'j: -:g
15 0 (5 (5
-.J -' -' -'
co
I'-
;;::
~
-
o
~
o 0
L!) '<t
...... '<t
en
Q)
~
<)
ro
It'l
-'
ui
(;
<IJ
Q)
t;
~
--:
-
~ m
~
Q) ro Q)
.~ g .~
~ ~ -:--_g
~ c
~ -:g :6
E 'Uj E
:J ~ :J
.S . E
.~ 5 :~
~ z ~
en
Q)
t;
III
It'l
en
[!!
<)
ro
N
L!)
'<t
L!)
'<t
L!)
'<t
L!)
(")
L!)
(")
L!)
(")
L!)
(")
L!)
(")
L!)
(")
L!)
(")
L!)
(")
L!)
(")
E
::J
E
Ox
ro
.s
-
~
Q)
I
en
Q)
~
::J
1:5
Q) ::J
Ol.b
III en
~
Q)-
> 0
8*
'Ox
c: III
~E
o
(")
o
(")
o
(")
o
(")
o
(")
o
(")
o
(")
o
N
o
(")
...
'"
""
~
<::
~
'0>
.Q
(j
o
(")
o
N
o
N
j
)
lD
Cl
<.)
II)
lD
Z
lD
...J
ll:
Cl
N
::;:
~
::;:
"'
ll:
~
'"
ll:
N
ll:
~
00
L{) '<I'
00
L{)'<I'
00
L{) '<I'
o 0
L{)'<I'
o 0
L{) '<I'
o 0
L{)'<I'
00
L{)'<I'
00
L{) C")
0L{)
'<I'~
.
o L{)
L{) C")
o 0
L{)'<I'
o 0
L{) '<I'
II)
-'<:
U
CO
.0
-
Q)
CIl
g
;g
='
lD
:0 -D
ro ro
o .0
~ ~
C Q)
:J ~
8 z.g
E ill 2
o ~(;)
~" CD
-~roc
~ ~.9- :.=
rn.ou'"
..c 1i5.5.2
Q:)rn"-"-
f/J "0 c...Q
"C L.."E w
to- ~ro"'"
~ ::; >-.~
~cQ)E
c e:E 0
<( L.L. CJ) .:::
o
T'"
.
.
.
o
T'"
.
.
.
o
T'"
.
.
.
o
T'"
.
.
.
o
T'"
.
.
.
o
T'"
o
C")
o
N
o
T'"
o
T'"
o
T'"
o
T'"
Q)
~
>-
t::
Q)
0.
o
~
0.
E
o
..=
-"'-
U Q)
ro.Q)
.0 ~
- -
Q) en
en 0
'0-
~ -
~a5
U
~~
(j)-g
o
C")
o
C")
o
C")
o
C")
o
C")
o
C")
o
C")
o
C")
L{)
C")
.
.
.
.
L{)
C")
o
'<I'
o
'<I'
CD
~
Q)
>
o
~Q)
Q) C
0>=
~a
ro-
0>5
~.~ ~
c c u
Q).- 2
:EEm
~ e en
~..... '0
"'C Q) '-
1!:E ~
~ ~ Co
- - Q)
~~ a:::
o
'<I'
.
.
.
o
'<I'
.
.
.
o
'<I'
.
.
.
o
'<I'
.
.
.
o
'<I'
.
.
.
o
C")
o
C")
o
C")
o
C")
-
w
~
"'
N
~ i
o
C")
L{)
C")
o
L{)
o
'<I'
o
L{)
o
'<I'
>-
t::
Q)
0.
o
~
>,0._
C E Q)
ro 0 ~
'- "-..... .c
0- en ::>
..... Q) ~ -
~ '-.:::' .....
u .a'o ~
rouo c
..c 2...... m
a:;.......... a:::
en (/) C >-
"Oro~ ~
ro ~ ~ (1)
>- Q) '0 _~
~'Oro
ro.- Q) :;;:
Q) en C
a:: ~.-
:Q
""
'-'
Ol
.0
.9
""
'-'
Ol
.0
Ol
.!!1
>-
c:
o
c:
Q)
E
a.
o
a;
>
Q)
C
Q)
'"
-0
o
E
E
8
'-'
Ol
e
::J
ti
2
Vi
Q)
a.
'<3
c:
.~
Q)
;;
.E
'"
c:
Ol
a.
c:
Q)
"'
~
-0
Q)
-0
-0
Ol
Q)
.0
Iii
"'
'"
""
'-'
Ol
.0
W
'"
'0
.E
ro.
-""
Q) '-'
> Q)
-=-0
liiOl
c: ~
.Q J2
:!:::(J)
-0",
-OQ)
Ol '-'
c: '-'
<(Ol
c:
Ol
;::.
.~
.E
'c
::J
c:
'iij
c:
'iij
E
.9
""
'-'
Ol
.0
W
'"
Q;
"'
"'
.!!l
Ol
Q)
'"
'-'
'0
.S
-0
'5
o
~
"'
Q)
5
ti
2
Vi
Ol
c:
"'
'x
Q)
"'
"'
Q)
c:
:J
.;
Q)
~
>-
t::
Q)
a.
e
a.
E
,g
Q)
Ii;
Q)
>
o
.0
Ol
-0
2
~
Vi
~
J!l
c:
Q)
E
e
::J
"'
Ol
Q)
E
""
'-'
Ol
.0
Qj
"'
:3
-
0:
Q)
:E 0:
v.I .~
Q) -
cz:: '"
....6
- ...
's.s
'" 0:
~~
.- -
- Q)
'3'Q.
~ 6
"0 0
o:U
'" ...
-=-~
.2 ~
- ,
~..,.
=...
"0'
O:N
.... ...
rn~
~ -
~E=
'in cu
="0
~ 0
,u
~o
... .-
"'U
"0 0
;-
- ...
rJ'lo:!:
~~
;;;:
..
'"
~
:;;:
Iii
I-
o
Z
'"
Ol
"
Ii;
~
c:
"
-0
'in
e
.9
c:
"
'-'
Ol
'0
Ol
""
'-'
Ol
.0
Qj
"'
~
.E
'"
c:
.2
ti
"
CIl
"'
~
"
a
Ol
"'
U
N
~
F
"
"
II)
.; ~
" u
'-2 ..E
Q) '"
~ ~
~ ~
$ e
1: :g
Q) '"
"0 Q)
'C;; 1-0
~ ~
01) 0
.5 ....
~ ~
.d~ ~
o
~ ~ 1=
.~ cl:= .r:o
.S "E lU
<t:: ~ 2
~ ~ tE
~] ~
~";j~ ~
";j ~ ~ S
e I;/.l -:S eo
en 8 tl.l "_5
o '" '"
~ = 0.. bJ} '5
oo(l,)cnC .D
oJ .0 ~ .~ ~
"" 0 0 ~
~c;E= ......
~~""tE ~
c: ~ 0 tl.> 0
~ ~~.;: N
-5 en x .S :5
~ gf"Vi ~ ..... ':: .....
ro~-52tUlUll.)
E ~.- ~ ~ ~ ~
rn c..::: 0000
o.s~~~--
l: aJ .0"'0 .. ..
Q.)~~.....'""'''''O'"C
..0 lU 0.0 0 ~ ~ a
o;~c..:-:::><><
~~:.gCd5~a
CI].5 ~ ~ ~ tn ~
g:-E ~ ~
c..6~eooo
Vl 1-0 ..... ro
ooo..tnbJ}
C '" 1::: c
~20:.Q
1-0 r.I:l_ 1-0
~:.;::;;:~
. . . .
"
-5
....
..0
'0
"
c..
o
'0
'"
'"
..
'"
C
.Sl
'OJ
"
lC
'u
Q)
0.
'"
'0
~
..
'0
C
.lS
'"
Q)
-5
-5
.~
"
"
C
..
'0
~
o
"
'-'
..
.5
'0
"
"
..g
;:l
'"
"
..0
0;
.c
'"
'"
..
~ 5
.. 0
~ ~
oj ~
~ <':>
.s 'D
'" ~
'0 "
a~~
01)" '"
.5.5 ><
~ ~'r;j
~T-T-l ~
.,n0-5
.5 U ~
"Oll)~
g.;:: "0
-..... Q)
bBO~u:i
= tU U tU
.- ()..!2 ~
"e; S ll)
"00..0]
-d)::::=~
E -5 C':j 0
.::: ~ =
lZl -:S 0
It:.~ ~'.a
o Cl) 8 ~
~S ~ ~
~ a 8.5
l1J "0..0 <Ll
.~ 8 ~ o:S
'0.0"5
=._ 0 0
-<UZ<.i::
. .
'0
"
~
;:l
'"
..
Q)
5
"
..0
0;
.c
'"
"
"
c
.lS
'"
'6
'"
:E
E-
>,
..
i<
~
9
'"
:c
01)
.;::
~
Q)
"
""
'"
"
~
o
5
..
o
N
~
...;
"
.c
o
c
..
Q)
c
o
5
o
cl:: 00
~;:;
<':> Q)
..,. 5
~Q)
t) .==
~ ::s 00
",ifo
t:: .. 0
tB~"7
...;-
;; ~-;<
..s on ~
r.n.5 llJ
r.fI~o;::
~ l-o._
"0 [f-l
2 l-o llJ
~c.8-g
...9'ESU
" 0 .0
..0110
15 ~ l-o
c.c Q)
c;'25
~5]
- 5 -<
~ tU lLl
.::: .!:: ..r::
'" ;:l -
~ g" S
..o~~
s.gp~
ro:.g rn"'
c ~ '0
o ~ ~
"''0'0
.~ a a
= r.n en
Q) Q)
0.",01)
o ~.5
..or..-.,E
~ 0 on
~ ~;J
~ E 0
~ 5.....l
~ =' ~
~r';Q
i< .c_" ;;
~ ""
.;:: lU .....
o~~
o
~
.....
o
c
.Sl
U
"
'"
~
Q)
.5
"
-5
. . .
Revision #52 12-13-1 B Animals
Background
The Council asked that this item be brought to a work session for discussion. The purposes of
the proposed changes to this section are enumerated and explained below. The minutes from the
various Planning Commission Meetings are also attached.
Discussion from the Apri112, 2005 Planning Commission Meeting
1. The Commission wanted to see changes to the definitions to ensure an animal could not
be confused between definitions.
Staff proposes changes to the definitions as shown below. Please note a section from Title 5
Police Regulations that provides a list of prohibited animals has been added to this report.
2. The Commission also wanted to discuss the structure for regulating farm anirnals. There
was some concern about farm animals being limited to 5 acre or larger parcels and
limited to a maximum of five farm animals without a conditional use permit.
Staffs objective is to prevent farm animals from being kept in 2.5 acre neighborhoods.
Staff selected five acres as the threshold because the existing code uses five acres as a
threshold for rural agricultural uses. Presently up to five farm animals are allowed per acre
in the R-l Zoning District without a permit. If the Commission would like to adjust the
number the proposed changes will need to be changed accordingly.
/ New Issue Raised Through Public Comment Period
3. An Andover resident stopped this past week and educated staff on falconry. The DNR
issues permits for falcomy (keeping of and hunting with raptors). State Statute permits
this activity and provides regulations for permits, sheltering requirements and lirnits the
nurnber of birds to one. Some of the most relevant information from State Statute is
attached.
Staff proposes to add an exemption for this activity with references to State Statute and DNR
regulations.
Background - Initial Areas of Concern
4. Urban agricultural uses are permitted in the urban area. The definition of urban
agricultural use includes pleasure/recreation animals. Pleasure/recreation animals are
defined as 'Animals not normally kept in a residence such as horses, ponies, foals,
donkeys, burros, mules or others'. This conflicts with City Code 5-1B which regulates
these animals and requires a 2.5 acre minimum lot size and provides additional standards
to ensure proper care of these animals.
Suggested approach: Eliminate pleasure/recreation animals from the definition of Urban
Agricultural Use. Add this use to the matrix for residential properties with at least 2.5 acres
in cornpliance with Title 5.
5. The Definition of Agricultural Use, Rural includes the raising of non-domestic animals.
Non-dornestic animals are defined as any animal, reptile or fowl, which is not naturally
1
tame or gentle but is of a wild nature or disposition or which, because of its vicious
nature or other characteristics, would constitute a danger to human life or property.
Suggested approach: These anirnals should not be allowed in the City. Eliminate non-
domestic animals from this definition.
6. Proposed changes are not intended to affect the Anoka Independent Grain & Feed farm
located on several hundred acres in the northwestern area of the City, which is presently a
permitted use. It is the intent of this ordinance amendment to prevent other feedlots from
moving into the City.
Suggested approach: Provide a definition for feedlots. List feedlots as a prohibited use in the
uses table. Provide an exemption for Anoka Independent Grain and Feed.
The latest changes suggested by Planning Commission concerning the maximum number of farm
animals allowed as a permitted use and adding alpacas and llamas to the definition of
Pleasure/Recreation Animals have been made.
Proposed Chanl!:es
12-2-2: DEFINITIONS:
AGRICULTURAL USE, RURAL: An area of five (5) or more contiguous acres which is used
for the production of farm crops such as vegetables, fruit trees, grain and other crops and their
, storage on the area, as v:@ll as f@r th@ Faisillg thmHlIl €If a€lm@still animals, fafm !mimals
,j nondomestic allimals aIla thll raisillg aIla bJllJ'lillg €If J'lleasllre.1rllllFCJati€lllal allimals ill @€Im1'lliall@il
..ith Titlil 5.
AGRICULTURAL USE, URBAN: An area ofless than five (5) contiguous acres which is used
for the purpose of growing produce including crops, fruit trees, shrubs, plants and flowers,
vegetables, and the like, provided such produce is intended solely for the use of owners on the
property or sale away from the property. It shall ill@lmle tR@ Faisillg €If a€lmilsti@ alla
:fIl@a8tlr€,(n~€r€atiell animals in €€JmBlial1€€ 7,'ith Title 5.
ANIMALS, DOMESTIC: f.llimals {l€lmm€llllj'llCJJ'lt f€lr J'lilts, sllllh as dogs, cats and similar
animals that can be ourchased at a retail oet store and maintained indoors.
ANIMALS, FARM: Animals alla J'l€lultry comrnonly kept for productive purposes on a farm,
such as cattle, hogs, sheep, goats, chickens, and other similar animals.
ANIMALS, NONDOMESTIC:=Afty Animals. retltihl €Ir f€l'?:l not defined as domestic. farm or
nleasure/recreational animals 'shieh is that are Il€lt llatllFallj' tam@ €Ir gelltl@ 8m is of a wild
nature or disposition or which, because of its vicious nature or other characteristics, would
constitute a danger to human life or property including the prohibited animals listed in City Code
5-1C-2.
/
ANIMALS, PLEASURE/RECREATIONAL: f.nimals not normally kept in a residence such as
horses, ponies, foals, donkeys, burros, mules, alnacas and llamas. or others.
2
FEEDLOT. LIVESTOCK- The place of confined feeding of livestock. poultry. or other animals
for food. fur. pleasure or resale purposes in yards. lots. pens. buildings. or other areas not
normallv used for pasture or crops and in which substantial amounts of manure or related other
wastes mav originate because of such feeding of animals.
12-13-1: PERMITTED USES 120:
Within any of the following districts, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of
the uses listed by district:
Permitted, Permitted Accessory, and Zoning District
Conditional Uses
R- R- R- R- R- M- M- G LB N SC G I
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 R B B
Keeping of pleasure/recreation
animals on properties at least 2.5 acres A A A A
in size in compliance with Title 5
Keeping of up to 5 farm animals nlus
one additional farm animal ner acre
above 5 acres on properties 5 acres or ~ ~ ~
greater un to a maximum of 20
animals
Keeping of more titan 5 farm animals
~ than allowed as a nermitted use on C C C
properties 5 acres or PTeater
Keeping of Domestic anirnals ~
less except in R 1). A A A A A A A
in cornnliance with Title 5
Feedlots, except Anoka Independent
Grain and Feed Inc. which is a X X X X X X X X X X X X X
permitted use that predates the
adoption of this ordinance.
NOTE: P = Permitted Use A = Accessory Use C = Conditional Use X = Prohibited Use
B. Residential Districts:
1. R-l Single-Family Rural District:
.^.ay site which has more than five (5) farm animals per acre shall require a
conditional use permit.
(The following City Code excerpt is provided to show how non-domestic animals are
regulated in another section of the City Code.)
5-1C-2: POLICE REGULATIONS: ANIMAL CONTROL: PROHIBITED ANIMALS:
(as it exists)
The following animals are prohibited within the city:
3
A. Any animal or species prohibited by Minnesota or federal law.
B. Any nondomesticated animal or species, including, but not limited to, the following:
1. All skunks, whether captured in the wild, domestically raised, de-scented or not de-
scented, vaccinated against rabies or not vaccinated against rabies.
2. All large cats of the family Felidae, such as lions, tigers, jaguars, leopards, cougars and
ocelots, except comrnonly accepted domesticated house cats.
3. All members of the family Canidae, such as wolves, foxes, coyotes, dingoes and jackals,
except domesticated dogs.
4. All crossbreeds, such as crossbreeds between dogs and coyotes or dogs and wolves, but
does not include crossbreeds between dornesticated animals.
5. All poisonous snakes, such as rattlesnakes, coral snakes, water moccasins, cobras or
copperheads.
6. All raccoons.
7. All apes and monkeys.
8. Other animals which are not listed explicitly above, but which can be easily defined in
this article as a nondornesticated animal including bears, wolverines and badgers. (Ord.
253,3-2-1999)
5-1 C-3: SALES PROHIBITED:
No person shall offer for sale, within the city lirnits, any anirnal prohibited in sections 5-1 C-l
and 5-1 C-2 of this article. (Ord. 253, 3-2-1999)
5-1C-4: EXCEPTIONS:
A. Animals Allowed By Permit:
1. Temporary Permit: Any person desiring to keep animals prohibited as described in this
article shall obtain a temporary permit from the city council. Such a permit shall be issued for
a period not to exceed thirty (30) days and shall specify further conditions under which such
animal shall be kept; provided, however, that no such permit shall be required for such
prohibited animal brought into the city for entertainment, show or promotional purposes
only. (Ord. 253, 3-2-1999; amd. 2003 Code)
2. Permanent Permit: A public zoo or other institution engaged in a permanent display of
animals rnay be issued a permanent permit, provided applicable zoning requirements are met.
3. State--Conditional Use Permit: Falconry shall reauire a conditional use nermit and be
subiect to As flermitted b'/ State Statute and the rel!ulatedions of lw the Minnesota
Deoartment of Natural Resources.
4
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - April 12, 2005
Page 8
11. City Code 12-13 lB. Animals
Several conflicts have been identified in the way that the keeping of animals is regulated
in the City Code.
Mr. Bednarz sumrnarized the proposed changes.
Commissioner Greenwald thought it was getting really popular to have ducks as pets and
he would like to add this to the list after chickens.
Commissioner Kirchoff asked what types of anirnals can not be kept.
Commissioner Jasper stated some anirnals fall into all of the above categories so there is
a problem with the definitions in the ordinance. They overlap each other. He stated
some of the definitions are by example, sorne are by inclusion and some are by exclusion
and they overlap each other.
Commissioner Jasper stated they could also have five farm anirnals on properties that are
five acres or greater so if you have four acres, you cannot have any farm animals but if
your have five acres, you can have five, if you have a hundred acres, you can have five.
He did not think that was a logical place to draw a line.
Mr. Bednarz stated regarding definitions, they would need some examples and he did not
think deer was that. A deer was not a domestic anirnal because it is not commonly kept
as a pet. He stated they do want to make some progress and there may be some items
with the definitions that they can tune up.
Commissioner Jasper respectfully disagreed because he believed deer could be
considered a farm animal, they are non-domestic animals and they could be recreational
animals. He stated there are other animals that fall into each of the categories such as a
pig. He stated this was a concern.
Commissioner Jasper stated the ordinance permits different types of animals in different
zoning districts and prohibits some in some zoning districts.
Commissioner Greenwald asked what the solution would be.
Commissioner Jasper stated they needed to rework their definitions to try to determine
what they were trying to accomplish. He stated they either need to do the table approach
or use the definitions that are either inclusive or exclusive.
Chairperson Daninger stated the list would always be changing because there are always
different animals that become pets. The consensus of the Comrnission was to bring this
item back with a little more focus on the definitions and farm animals specifically.
/
-5;-
\
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - JUNE 28,2005
The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was
called to order by Chairperson Daninger on June 28, 2005, 7:00 p.m., at the Andover City
Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota.
Commissioners present:
Chairperson Daninger, Commissioners Rex Greenwald,
Dean Vatne, Jonathan Jasper, Michael Casey and Valerie
Holthus.
Commissioners absent:
Commissioner Tim Kirchoff.
Also present:
City Planner, Courtney Bednarz
APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
j
June 14,2005
Motion by Greenwald, seconded by Holthus, to approve the minutes as presented.
Motion carried on a 6-ayes, O-nays, I-present (Daninger), I-absent (Kirchoff) vote.
WORK SESSION: ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE
1. City Code 12-13 1 B Animals (Continued)
Mr. Bednarz summarized the staff report.
Commissioner Jasper stated on non-domestic animals he thought pleasure, recreational
anirnals should be added to the exclusions in the definition of non-domestic animals.
Commissioner Jasper stated a concern was they could have 5 anirnals on 5 acres and no
anirnals on 4.9 acres and 5 animals on 100 acres. He did not think it made sense. He
thought it would make sense to allow a smaller number on a smaller parcel and a larger
number on a larger parcel. Chairperson Daninger agreed but wondered how they would
control this.
'.
Mr. Bednarz stated they are suggesting there could be more than 5 animals on parcels
larger than 5 acres but that would require a conditional use permit whereas 5 or less
/
-(-
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - June 28, 2005
Page 2
)
would simply be a permitted use. Commissioner Jasper thought that made sense because
that would allow a way to address this.
Commissioner Vatne asked if horses were allowed on 2.5 acres or larger. Mr. Bednarz
stated they were.
Commissioner Vatne wondered if they would see a lot of requests for a conditional use
permit.
Commissioner Jasper asked ifthere was a limit for horses. Mr. Bednarz stated after three
acres they could have one additional horse per acre with a maximum of up to seven
horses.
Commissioner Jasper thought something like this would rnake sense for farm animals
also. Chairperson Daninger thought that was why they should go with the Conditional
Use Permit and see how many applications there were.
Commissioner Jasper stated they could have five at five acres and one for each additional
acre over five acres up to twenty acres and then there would need to be a conditional use
permit. Commissioner Holthus indicated she did not have a problem with this at all.
Commissioner Jasper stated in looking at the notes for definitions, Commissioner
Greenwald brought up for discussion the idea of including ducks as farm animals but
some people have them as pets, which would be considered a domestic animal. He did
not know if this was something they should address. Commissioner Greenwald stated he
understood that some of the kids in the City have ducks as pets and this would be one
way to regulate it without saying no.
Commissioner Jasper stated if it can be bought at a pet store it should be a domestic pet.
Commissioner Vatne stated he was comfortable with everything except the last itern,
which is deer. Mr. Bednarz stated staff would consider deer to be a non-domestic animal
because they do carry the potential to damage property and generally are not kept for a
productive purpose. Cornmissioner Vatne agreed.
Commissioner Jasper asked if there was somewhere in this code which requires a farm
animal to be contained. Mr. Bednarz stated there is a code that does cover this along with
domestic animals.
Mr. Bednarz discussed the exemption in the Code for animals licensed by the State with
the Commission.
Cornmissioner Jasper stated based on the fact that three days ago a child was attached by
a wild animal that was a pet, he wondered if this exception would allow any vicious
animal to be kept in Andover if the DNR permits it. He thought the idea was they were
-'7-
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - June 28, 2005
Page 3
/
not going to allow vicious animals in Andover and he did not think the exception should
be in the code. Commissioner Greenwald agreed.
Commissioner Casey stated it does stipulate that animal control that is prohibited animals
and they have lions, tigers, jaguars, etc listed. Commissioner Jasper stated the exception
swallows the rule. The exception states "except for as regulated by the DNR".
Chairperson Daninger thought the intent was for the citizen input regarding falcons. Mr.
Bednarz thought there may be a way to adjust the item to prevent the conflict. They do
have the list of prohibited animals. He thought if they referenced Section 5 under Section
3, the proposed addition that would start them rnoving in the right direction.
Commissioner Vatne stated for clarification they would add, "As permitted by the MN
DNR with the exception..." referencing back to the prohibited animal section.
Commissioner Jasper stated this does not work because the prohibited animal's section 5-
lc-2b says "Any non-domesticated animal including but not lirnited to the following..."
and the non-dornesticated animal definition is broader than the representative list.
Commissioner Jasper thought before they decided how to fix this, they should decide if
they should fix this. He appreciated the fact that people have different hobbies and
interests than his but he did not know, in his opinion, ifbirds of prey within the City are
appropriate. These are hunting birds of prey.
Mr. Bednarz stated this part in Title 5 is where the issue arises. Within this section there
is provided an exception that allows a temporary permit for keeping animals prohibited
up to thirty days under specific conditions or even a permanent permit for a public zoo or
other public institution, which seems less likely. In the Title 5, there already is an
exemption with a time limitation. If they reference Title 5 and the prohibited animals and
the exemption already provided for them, does that satisfy the concern.
Commissioner Jasper stated his opinion is that exception will allow for a temporary
permit for a carnival corning through town or a ternporary showing of animals at a
school, which is fine, and if someone wants to get a temporary permit to engage in
falconry for a short time period, they would fall under that. His hesitation is if they want
long term of that or any of the other non-domestic animals as defined and ifthey do, they
should list specifically which ones they are allowing because to say as permitted by the
DNR is to have the exception swallow the rule and basically allow any animal into the
City of Andover without the City Council or staff having any control over it.
Chairperson Daninger wondered if Commissioner Jasper thought they should strike out
item three. Comrnissioner Jasper stated it would be his recommendation to do this.
/
Cornmissioner Vatne stated he was troubled by this one because it is specialized and he
was back to sorne ofthe trade offs and he would be ternpted to leave falconry in but the
problem is how would they draw the line on others that are on the periphery of that as
--;r-
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes -June 28, 2005
Page 4
/
well. Commissioner Jasper stated he would not be nearly as offended by the idea of
specifically making an exception for falconry with a permit than a blanket exception for
anything permitted by the DNR.
Chairperson Daninger stated they will add falconry as an exception with a Conditional
Use Permit. Commissioner Jasper agreed but indicated there would also need to be a
DNR permit as well. Chairperson Daninger agreed and thought this could be reviewed in
the future for other animals as well.
Commissioner Jasper stated he would take this as a compromised position because he
would rather not see it at all.
11. City Code 9-9-11 Housing Maintenance
rz summarized the staff report.
, /
Commissioner sper asked on page 17 and 20, it references that if someone else is
controlling the te erature it shall be 68 degrees Fahrenheit on the design heating day.
He wondered what t definition was for a "design heating day" and is it really the intent
that it stays exactly at degrees. Mr. Bednarz sated it is not the intent to have a fixed
degree, under the section , t the beginning header to have that minimum heating
capability. That statement co es directly frorn the building code and that is one of the
criteria for being a habitable stru ure under the building code. He stated the "design
heating day" is defined in the buildl code. The reason they were making that addition
was to correct the previous strikeout w . ch conflicted with the building code.
Commissioner Jasper stated he would like to ow at some point what the phrase meant.
Chairperson Daninger thought they could put in definition ofthis in the Code.
Commissioner Holthus wondered if they should leave "at least" in the c
it out.
Commissioner Jasper stated he would like to have the
that this is an appropriate standard.
Chairperson Daninger stated he was comfortable with this beca
reliable source.
Commissioner Jasper stated on page 19, there were two changes as far as venti
habitable and non-habitable rooms, changing from 10 to 8 percent and from 5 to
percent. He wondered why the changes were chosen to be rnade. Mr. Bednarz state
those were taken directly from the International Building Code.
/
.J7_
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - July 26, 2005
Page 3
)
Chairperson Daninger explained the process the City goes through when reviewing and
changing City Codes.
*
1. City Code 12-13 1 B Animals (Continued)
The latest changes suggested by the Planning Commission have been made and are
reflected in the staff report.
Mr. Bednarz summarized the staff report.
Commissioner Jasper stated they should add a limit of twenty farm animals without
needing to get a Conditional Use Permit from the City.
Commissioner Greenwald wondered what cost for a Conditional Use Permit is. Mr.
Bednarz believed the application fee is $350.
Commissioner Greenwald stated he did not rernember the logic of a limit of twenty
animals. Commissioner Jasper explained this was part of the discussion from the
previous meeting.
\
Commissioner Greenwald wondered what the biggest lot size was in Andover. Mr.
Bednarz stated the biggest farm land is the turkey farm but they are exempt from this
ordinance.
/
....-
11.
City Code 9-9-11 Housing Maintenance (Continued)
Commissioner Jaspe ated on page 11, 9-9-3, definitions, it talks about the State
Building Code, the Intern . nal Building Code and the International Residential Code,
after that they should add the d "as" so those are changed, they do not necessarily
change the City Code. Mr. Vrchota lieved that was the intent so that every time those
were updated, they did not have to do a e amendment.
Commissioner Jasper stated on page 15, number I,' icated the dwelling has to be heated
up to 68 degrees and then page 19 at the top basically h e same requirement. As a
matter of clarity and drafting, was this redundant or did it ser a purpose. He thought
they both meant the same thing. Mr. Vrchota stated the reason th ew language is
repeated is because the language that was stricken was also repeated. e section is
under responsibilities for owners and occupants in regards to the heating 0 tal
properties. The other is speaking rnore specifically to heating standards. He sta
could see if one of those could be removed.
\
Commissioner Jasper stated on pages 20, 9-9-12, it says that "every dwelling within the
City shall conform to these different Codes." His suggestion was to drop the language
/
-/0-
*'
;
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - August 9, 2005
Page 3
Comrnissioner Holthus stated on page nine they have "see Storage and D' osalof
Garbage and Refuse"; she wondered if they were going to add "0 'me er week" at the
end of the sentence. Mr. Vrchota stated this was already lis III another part of the code
and instead of repeating this they would leave it whe . was.
Commissioner Holthus stated on page , paragraph B, last sentence, she wondered what
the sentence rneant. Mr. Vrcho ated this would be a vacant dwelling that is unsecured
so people can come and s they please.
Commissio asper stated on page 6, Dwelling, they talked about "one or rnore portions
thereo , that phrase should be within commas.
Chairperson Daninger stated they needed to make a determination on where Llamas and
Alpacas should be listed in the Code.
Commissioner Holthus thought Llamas and Alpacas should be added to Anirnals:
Pleasure/Recreational. Commissioner Kirchoff agreed.
Commissioner Kirchoff wondered if they were limiting the nurnber of these animals. Mr.
Bednarz stated they are limited by the definition of what they are. The number of
animals you can have is different if it is considered a farm animal compared to
pleasure/recreational.
Comrnissioner Jasper stated he was rnore comfortable with these animals being kept as
farm animals because he thought they were more for production.
A resident came forward and requested the Public Hearing be reopened because he
arrived late and did not have a chance to speak and would like to address the issue of
Llamas and Alpacas.
The Commission agreed to reopen the Public Hearing.
Motion by Greenwald, seconded by Vatne to reopen the public hearing at 7:24 p.rn.
Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Don Eveland, 2575 Andover Boulevard, made a presentation to the Cornmission
regarding Llamas and Alpacas.
Mr. Eveland did not understand the reasoning for the restrictions on the number of
animals allowed on farms. He indicated he already had more than twenty animals on his
farmland. He noted there was a big difference between types of anirnals and the impact
they would have on the property.
Motion by Greenwald, seconded by Casey, to close the public hearing at 7:31 p.rn.
Motion carried unanirnously.
-//-
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - August 9, 2005
Page 4
Cornmissioner Greenwald stated when they were discussing this previously he asked how
many farms are bigger than twenty acres in Andover and staff gave them a rough idea
and then he was never comfortable with that restriction, but he was on a Board that tries
to have some sort of consensus. He thought they needed to state there is a fee for a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP). He asked staff what the cost was for a CUP. Mr.
Bednarz stated a CUP process requires an application with a summary of the site with the
operation as proposed. It begins with a public hearing at the Planning Cornmission level
and the cost is approximately $350.00 per CUP. The CUP applies to a lot of uses in town
that may have adverse affects on surrounding properties if they are not conducted in a
manner to prevent that and that is why a CUP exists is so reasonable conditions can be
placed on an operation to prevent that from happening.
Commissioner Greenwald wondered how long does a CUP exist and how people are
grandfathered in. Mr. Bednarz stated operations that are there today will continue and
this ordinance would not affect existing operations until they want to expand those
operations. A CUP can be limited to a certain period of time, can be reviewed yearly, or
can otherwise be limited with specific conditions. He indicated a CUP traditionally runs
with the property and continue over long periods of time unless there are adverse effects
on other properties that cause it to be reviewed.
I
Commissioner Greenwald wondered if there suddenly were more animals due to nature,
would the person have to get a CUP for the additional animal. Chairperson Daninger
noted they reviewed this item thoroughly previously and thought what they carne up with
was fair and in good intention.
Commissioner Jasper stated the reason for the CUP is to make sure that there are
reasonable accommodations and also reasonable restrictions on someone.
Some ofthe Commissioners thought Llamas and Alpacas should be added to
pleasure/recreational animals.
Commissioner Jasper thought it belonged in farm animals but would agree to add thern to
pleasure/recreational animals.
Commissioner Vatne indicated he still felt comfortable with the twenty animals but to go
further into detail, they could split the type of animal into size or type. He did not want
to do this but it could be done.
Chairperson Daninger stated regarding the noise issue, they discussed the noise ordinan
in depth and the avenues to enforce it are difficult but they tried to u' ore
restrictions on it to help at least a little bit.
\
)
Commissioner stated the noise ordinance is not specific to the snowmobile
errain vehicle code and could pertain to other machines.
~/z..-
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304
MAIN (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO:
Mayor and Councilmembers
CC:
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
Will Neumeister, Community Development Director ~
FROM:
Andy Cross, Associate Planner #t
SUBJECT:
Revision # 68 - Guesthouses
DATE:
September 27,2005
INTRODUCTION
The Council reviewed this revision on August 16th, 2005. One srnall change was recommended,
but information was requested about what our code allows in regard to "mother-in-law"
apartments and separate rental units in single-family houses.
/
DISCUSSION
The vast majority of residential lots in Andover are zoned "single family." This means that there
can only be one single dwelling unit per lot. When a standard house is converted so that two
families can live in it without sharing living space or kitchen facilities, it becomes a multi-family
structure and no longer conforms to the single family zoning district. This also applies when a
separate structure is built on a single family lot that can provide sleeping and cookingfacilities
for a second family.
The deciding factor between a mother-in-law apartment or guesthouse and a non-conforming
second dwelling unit is kitchen facilities. Chapter 12-14-16 defines guesthouses as a building
"where accommodations for sleeping are provided but no kitchen facilities." Without a kitchen,
the guesthouse is unlikely to be used as a rental unit in the future.
Respectfully submitted,
Attachments
Revision #68
Minutes - August 16th, 2005
/
Revision # 68
12-14-16 Guesthouses
Backl!:round
Current code allows the construction of one principle structure per residential property.
Over tirne "Guesthouses" tend to be finished and rented as a separate dwelling unit,
which conflicts with the City Code by producing two principal dwelling units on a single
residential property. This revision proposes the removal of the "Guesthouse" language
from the Code.
At their April 26th, 2005 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended no change to
the current code. They felt the existing language provided adequate control over
guesthouses and should rernain in the City Code.
At the August 3rd, 2005 City Council meeting, the Council requested a clarification of
this revision.
. Proposed Chanre
Per the April26t Planning Commission meeting, Chapter 12-14-16 - Guesthouses will
not be deleted.
.'
12-14-16: GUESTHOUSES:
A. Guesthouses, for purpose of this title, shall be an accessory building detached from the
principal building where accommodations for sleeping are provided but no kitchen
facilities are provided. The intended use is for persons visiting the occupants of the
principal building and shall not be used as a rental property.
B. Guesthouses shall be permitted in all residential districts, shall be located the required
depth of the rear yard or more from the principal building, and shall conform to the
side yard requirements for the principal building. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970)
/
-2-
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 16, 2005
Page 6
@ Rev1,10" #68 - Go,"hou,,,
Mr. Neumeister reviewed previous discussions with the Council.
Councilmember Jacobson thought they should change "shall not" to "is not".
Councilmember Knight wondered if they had a separate office building. Mr. Neumeister stated this
would fall under detached accessory structure.
Acting Mayor Orttel wondered if they had a maid or servants quarters. Mr. Neumeister stated it
could not have a kitchen. It could be an attached structure.
eister reviewed previous discussions with the Council.
Acting Mayo Orttel stated steel and aluminum are an expensive alternative to vinyl siding and he
thought what th are trying to state is that they do not want sheet metal as a siding.
The Council was fine . th the changes made.
-'
Mr. Neumeister reviewed previou
Councilmember Jacobson thought what y were talking about at the last meeting was that they did
not want to be completely surprised and wan d to be kept updated on what is happening in the City.
Councilrnember Trude stated she would like to se 'tems 2,3, and 4. Acting Mayor Orttel stated he
would like to see item 4.
Councilmernber Knight thought this would be helpful for ern so they know what is going on in
case residents ask them. Councilmember Jacobson stated he ould like to be informed so Item 4
would work for him.
Mr. Neumeister reviewed previous discussions with the Council.
Revision #76 - Public Hearing Process
Councilmember Jacobson thought this would be too costly to make new signs each type of
development. Acting Mayor Orttel thought they could have an interchangeable hang
could go on the public hearing sign for information.
The Council thought more information should go into the notices telling residents what is happen' g
-3'~
Revision #81
City Code 12-4-5 Encroachments
City Code 12-2-2 Definitions
Backe:round
The Council requested that this item be brought to a work session for discussion.
The purpose of this proposed amendrnent is to allow front porches and decks to encroach
up to eight feet into front and rear yard setback areas. This issue arises several times each
year. Residents typically do not pursue variance requests for front porches. Decks are
allowed to encroach into the rear yard setback area as a matter of Building Department
policy provided they are 'freestanding' or self supporting. This typically results in
additional posts to support the deck.
Proposed Chane:es
Please note that Revision #81 revisits a section that has already been proposed for
amendment (Revisions # 25, 26, 27, 28 and 31). For clarity the previously proposed
changes are still shown with strikeouts and underlines but are not shown in bold. The
new Revision #81 is shown with strikeouts and double underlines in bold.
12-2-2: Definitions:
/
DECK: a horizontal. unenclosed olatform with or without attached railinlls. seats.
trellises or other features. attached or functionallv related to a orincioal use or site.
FRONT YARD PORCH: a oortico. veranda or colonnade consistinll of a deck. railinlls
and roof suooorted bv colurnns. that mav be screened. and is located at the entrance or .
across the front of a residential dwellinll unit.
STOOP: a olatform or deck which is the too level of a stairwav svstem that extends from
the entrance of a buildinll.
12-4-5: PERMITTED ENCROACHMENTS:
The following shall not be considered as encroachments on setback and height
requirements, subject to other conditions hereinafter provided:
A. In Any Yards:
1. Posts, flues, belt course, leaders, sills, pilasters, lintels, cornices, eaves, gutters,
awnings, open terraces, open canopies, steps, flagpoles, chimneys, ornamental
features, open fire escapes, sidewalks and window wells.
., /
2. Terraces, steps, exposed ramps (wheelchair), stoops, or similar features~
provided they do These features shall not extend above exceed the height of the
J
ground floor level of the principal structure, ef nor shall they extend to a distance
less than three feet (3') from any lot line flef or less than one foot (1 ') from any
existing or proposed access drive.
3. Yard lights and nameplate signs in residential districts, trees, shrubs, plants,
floodlights, or other source of light illuminating authorized signs, or light
standards for illuminating parking areas, loading areas or yards for safety and
security reasons, provided the direct source of light is not visible frorn the public
right of way or adjacent residential property.
4. All projections encroachments shall not exceed thirty-six inches (36") as
rneasured at ground level.
. /
B. A porch or stoop for a dwelling not covered in subsection A.. shall be allowed to
encroach up to eight feet (encroachment area) in front of the normal othenvise
reauired front yard setback for a dwelling unit provided that:
1. In no case shall a porch be closer than twentv (20) feet from the front vard
propertv line.
2. The front yard Dorch may contain a screen, but windows and full walls
shall be prohibited in the encroachment area.
3. Roof eaves shall not be allowed beyond the encroachment limit a.IT.a...for
front and side vards fflH and shall be comparable to the existing house.
4. A residential stoop shall onlv extend four (4) feet from the front porch,
aH&-shall onlv be used as the top level of a stairwav system and shall not
be allowed beyond the encroachment limit area for front yards.
B.c. In Side and Rear Yards (Not Along Street): Detached outdoor picnic shelters or
living rooms gazebos or patio decks may extend to within ten feet (10') of a side or rear
lot line: except, that No such structures shall exceed five hundred (500) square feet.
(;D. In Rear Yards:
1. Laundry drying equipment, Clotheslines. outdoor eating facilities, picnic
tables, and recreational equipment, provided these are not less than ten
feet (10') from any lot line. (Amended Ord. 8,10-21-1970)
2. Decks are exempted from the rear yard setback requirements, except that a
deck may not be located closer than fifteen (15) feet from the rear property
line.
2. Decks shall be allowed to encroach into the rear yard setback provided
that no portion of the deck extends more than eight (8) feet into the
othenvise required rear yard setback.
/
-2.-
,
DE. Ouasi Public Structures: No quasi-public structure shall be located within the public
right of way except by permit issued bv the governing body. Such structures shall
include. but not be limited to: utility structures and enclosures. trash containers. bicycle
racks. benches, planting boxes. awnincs. flagpoles. light standards. stairs. stoops, light
wells.loadinc wells. signs. and other such structures. (Amended Ord. 8. 10-21-1970)
/
D. On Comer Lots (Ineluding Rural i\reas) M& : On comer lots (including rural areas),
nothing shall be placed or allowed to grow in such a mar~er as materially to impede
yision between a height of two and one halffeet (2 1/2') and ten feet (1 a') above the
centerline grades of the intersecting streets within fifteen feet (15') of the intersecting
street right of '.vay lines. This restriction shall also apply to the planting of crops and to
yard grades that result in elevations that impede yision ',vi thin fifteen feet (15') of any
intersecting street right of way lines. Vl.mended Ord. 8, 10 21 1970; arnd. 2003 Code)
E. Restrictions On Lot CO'ierage: In no event shall off street parking space, structures of
any type, buildings or other features coyer rnore than seventy five percent (75%) ofthe
lot area resulting in less than twenty five percent (25%) landscaped area in residential
districts.
,
F. Exemptions From Height Limits: Height limitations shall not apply to barns, silos and
other structures on farms, to church spires, belfries, cupolas and domes, monuments,
chimneys and smokestacks, flagpoles, public and public utility facilities, transmission
towers of commercial and priyate radio broadcasting stations, television antennas, and
parapet walls elCtending not more than four feet (1 ') aboye the limited height of the
building except as herein provided. V.mended Ord. 8, 10 21 1970)
/
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - June 28, 2005
Page 3 (excerpt)
1. City Code General Discussion Item - Front Porches
At the previous meeting the group agreed to consider allowing front porches to encroach
into the front yard setback area sirnilar to the Woodbury example. On a similar topic,
decks are currently required to rneet rear yard setback requirements (between 30 and 50
feet depending upon the Zoning District). The Building Department has traditionally
allowed decks to encroach in the rear yard setback ifthe deck is constructed as a "free
standing accessory structure". Staff would like the Commission to discuss the potential
for a provision, also currently used by Woodbury:
"Decks are also exempt frorn the rear yard setback requirements, except that a deck may
not be located closer than fifteen (15) feet from the rear property line."
/
Commissioner Jasper stated on the porches, based on previous discussions, he would like
to make sure nothing extends beyond eight feet. In the changes it says eight feet plus
-3-
, I
eves, which are really undefined and could be another three or four feet. Commissioner
Vatne indicated likewise the stoop up to four feet.
Mr. Bednarz wondered if it also included stairs. He noted on page 30, part 2, they have
some exernptions there already in the existing code and although it isn't right now, the
way it would be interpreted or linked together would be eight feet plus up to three feet of
those items so then they would be up to eleven feet and what the Commission is saying is
eight feet total including other items.
The Commission agreed that eight feet should encompass all parts of the front porch with
nothing, except stairs, encroaching further.
Chairperson Daninger stated in the back, the change would allow up to fifteen feet for a
deck. Commissioner Vatne thought it was reasonable. Cornmissioner Jasper stated he
would not allow it. There is a reason for backyard setbacks and he did not think there
was any reason to rnake a blanket exception for a deck. If they are going to do that, they
might as well allow any structure or addition back there and he did not see a rationale
reason to reduce a setback for this type of structure,
Chairperson Daninger asked what the reason was for the change. Mr. Bednarz stated
they see a lot of these requests in a summer on urban lots.
, /
Commissioner Jasper suggested the deck be the same as the porch. Ifthe porch
encroached by eight feet then the deck could encroach by eight feet to keep it consistent.
Mr. Bednarz indicated he liked that suggestion and thought it made a lot of sense.
Commissioner Jasper asked on page 30, the new C. It talks about rear yard picnic
shelters, the extension, the size within ten feet of the lot line and not rnore than five
hundred square feet for picnic shelters, living rooms or patio decks. It seems to make an
exception for a living room to go within ten feet of the rear lot line which did not make
any sense to him. He understood the picnic shelter or patio deck but he thought the
words living room should be stricken because it could be construed as an extension of the
house. Commissioner Holthus thought it should be replaced with Gazebo.
Commissioner Jasper stated he did not have a problem with changing it to Gazebo.
, /
-1-
, J
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NoW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
MAIN (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
Will Neumeister, Community Development Directortd::t....
FROM: Andy Cross, Associate Planner AfX-
SUBJECT: Revision # 82 - Dirtbikes, etc.
DATE: September 27,2005
INTRODUCTION
The City Council reviewed Code Revision #82 at their September 6th, 2005 meeting.
Discussions arose surrounding limiting the use of ATV's, snowmobiles, and off-highway
rnotorcycles to rural areas and prohibiting them in R-4, R-3, and R-2 zoning districts. There was
also interest in dirt track ordinances in other cities.
DISCUSSION
These same topics arose in 2002 when a revision to the City's Snowmobile & ATV ordinance
came before the Council at the request of a resident. At that time the Council directed staff to
investigate what surrounding communities have done to regulate the use of dirtbikes on private
property.
The research, reports, and minutes frorn those meetings are attached. The newest addition to the
research is a new ordinance from the City of Ramsey. They have recently adopted regulations
very similar to our own: a line has been drawn across the city below which snowmobiles, ATV's,
and OHM's can only be driven on private property. This ordinance was adopted in response to
snowmobiles using and abusing public streets during the winter months. The Ramsey Police
Department is responsible for the enforcement of this ordinance.
Attachments
Revision #82
May 10, 2005 Item
November 12,2002 Item
Minutes 9/17/02 - 12/03/02
City of Ramsey Newsletter Itern
City of Ramsey Regulations
\
)
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Revision # 82
6-4 SNOWMOBILES, ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES, AND OFF -HIGHWAY
MOTORCYCLES
Background
A resident has come forward and requested that changes be made to the City Code
regarding the use of dirt bikes. The resident presented a series of additions she felt could
be added to the City Code to lirnit the nuisance created by the use of motorbikes on
residential property.
As a discussion item at their June 14th, 2005 meeting, the Planning Commission debated
the resident's ideas and recommended two changes to Title 6, Chapter 4 of the City Code,
"Snowmobiles and ATV's."
I
Proposed Changes
A definition of "Off-Highway Motorcycles" will be added to Title 6, Chapter 4.
Language will also be added that will limit the use of Off-Highway Motorcycles to the
hours between 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM.
To help illustrate what our State Statutes have in regard to ATV's and rnotorcycles,
please find the applicable statutes attached to this report, as well as Title 5, Chapter 6,
"Noise Control" and Title 6, Chapter 4, "Snowmobiles and All-Terrain Vehicles" as they
currently appear in the Code.
At their July 26th, 2005 rneeting, the Planning Commission recommended the following
changes:
. "Off-Highway Motorcycles" be added to the title of Chapter 6-4
. "(OHM)" be added to the title of the definition for off-highway motorcycles
. "AND ATV'S" be added to the title and body of Chapter 6-4-10
See draft minutes.
DEFINITIONS:
OFF-HIGHWAY MOTORCYCLE (OHM): A motorized, off-highway vehicle
traveling on two wheels and having a seat or saddle designed to be straddled by the
operator and handlebars for steering control, including a vehicle that is registered
under chapter 168 for highway use when it is used for off-highway operation on
trails or unimproved terrain. (M.S. 84.787 subd. 7)
..........................................................................................................
6-4-8: EXEMPTIONS FROM PROVISIONS:
,
)
The city's enforcement agency or the county sheriffs department, in order to provide
enforcernent, shall be exempt from the requirernents of this chapter. (Amended Ord. 109,
6-6-1995)
-2-
6-4-9: VIOLATION; PENALTY:
Any person violating any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and,
upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as provided in section 1-4-1 of this code.
(Amended Ord. 109,6-6-1995; amd. 2003 Code)
6-4-10: OFF-HIGHWAY MOTORCYCLES AND ATV'S; HOURS OF
OPERATION
Off-highway motorcycles and A TV's shall not be operated between the hours of
8:00 PM and 8:00 AM within the City.
-3-
<ANDbVE~
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NoW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US .
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission Members
Will Neumeister, Director of Community Development tL
City Code General Discussion Item - Dirt Bikes
~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
May 10, 2005
INTRODUCTION
Once again a request has been received from a resident to develop an ordinance restricting the operation of
recreational motorized vehicles on residential property (see attached letter).
As you may recall, on September 17,2002 the Council reviewed a request from an Andover resident that
Ordinance #109 (Regulating All Terrain Vehicles and Snowmobiles) be amended to also regulate the use of dirt
bikes in the City of Andover. That night, Council directed that this be further investigated and a report on the
options that could be proposed be brought back at a future Council meeting. The report was provided and Council
directed that the issue of establishing a new dirt bike ordinance be dealt with using the existing noise ordinance.
DISCUSSION
I Again as you may recall, in the original report it was noted that the resident indicated that numerous times a
neighbor has ridden dirt bikes very close to their home and it is very irritating to them. The resident called
numerous times to complain about the neighbor to City Council and Staff. City Staff indicated that it is a rural area
in which they live and this is typical of what occurs in those areas. The City's Zoning Enforcement Officer
researched the Sherburne County Ordinance regarding dirt bikes. Sherburne County had taken action to make dirt
bike tracks a conditional use, then after residents' opposition they made them a permitted use with certain
conditions. This lead to further problems. Ultimately a county task force was created to review and give
recommendations.
The Planning Commission and City Council discussed this topic at meetings in the fall of 2002. The Council
indicated to staff that they were not interested in creating a speclal ordinance to regulate dirt bikes. They advised
that in the future as dirt bike complaints are reported they should be treated as complaintS and regulated by the
City's noise ordinance.
ACTION REOUESTED
The author of the attached letter appeared at a City Council open forum on May 3, 2005 and that night Council
directed the staff to bring this issue once again to the Planning Commission to determine whether the City Code
should be amended to regulate recreation motorized vehicles on residential property. Please review and advise.
Respectfully submitted?
Will Neumeisterad--
Attachment
Letter from property owner
- '1-
March 20, 2005
Andover City Council
Andover, MN
RE: Proposed Motorized Bike and Ramp Ordinance.
Dear Council:
This letter is in regards to developing an ordinance to restrict the operation of recreation
motorized vehicles on residential property. As you are aware, the operation of such
vehicles is a nuisance in regards to noise as well as fugitive dust. I have written to you
previously on this matter and your response was that you found it difficult to restrict such
activity because any restriction may also unwittingly also restrict the activity of
motorized vehicles used for yard and home maintenance, specifically lawn tractors.
I have taken it upon myself to research city ordinances across the United States to
formulate an ordinance that will serve to limit the disturbance associated with motorized
bikes/dirt bikes without restricting the operation oflawn tractors. I submit the following
for your consideration and hopeful adoption by the council.
J
MOTORIZED BIKES/DIRT BIKES
1. Motorized bikes/dirt bikes on residential property shall NOT be operated
between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. with courtesy given to other
residents during use hours.
2. Operation of the motorized bikes/dirt bikes shall be limited to within the
owner's property within a sufficient setback to not violate the City's noise
ordinance at the property line. The property owner is responsible for
providing on demand by the City, proof that the noise ordinance is not
violated.
3. Operation ofthe motorized bikes shall NOT generate dust or cause erosion
onto neighboring properties.
RAMPS
1.
No permanent ramps of any size or material (including soil) for use with
skates, skateboards, bicycles, motorized bikes (dirt bikes), and snow mobiles
shall be permitted in Andover on residential property.
Temporary, completely portable, ramps may be used on private property only
and shall NOT be used between 8:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m., with courtesy given
to other residents during use hours. Temporary ramps shall NOT have a ramp
surface area exceeding 4 feet by 8 feet and shall be stored inside an approved
2.
J
--;--
)
storage area or garage when not in use and between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and
8:00 a.m. daily.
I hope you will consider adopting these ordinances. I feel they allow the use of
motorbikes/dirt bikes while not infringing on the rights of others to not be unduly
subjected to the noise and fugitive dust. If you have any questions or would like to
discuss any of these items with me please call me at either (763) 434-5975 or (651) 634-
7332.
Sincerely,
Ann M. Curnow
15336 Cottonwood St. NW
Andover, MN 55304
/
/
-b-
(' / t. / -Hr DrcP.,,,Jtu1t:.e...
/ /Jer/l(/( Ale. Cov.,..J (j
/
SECTION 16.6
GENERAL STANDARDS FOR PRIVATE MOTOR SPORT
VEmCLETRACKS
This section covers motor sport activities, which include operation of dirt bikes, all terrain vehicles, mud
trucks, and racecars used for recreation on private property in the unincorporated areas of the County.
Subdivision 1. Definitions:
Track:
A course built for the operation of motorized vehicles which operate in a repetitive,
continuous manner or an area where recreational motorized vehicles, through their
repetitive use have altered or changed the natural contour of the landscape and created a
clearly identifiable track.
Subdivision 2. Permitted sites
Sites which meet the following criteria are permitted uses in Sherburne County, unless prohibited by a
more restrictive ordinance through another municipalitY:
,
/
1.
The parcel ofland is not in a residential subdivision.
2. The track must be located a minimum of 1,000 feet from any residence, except that of the owner.
3. The track must be located a minimum of 1,000 feet from a livestock shelter and/or or arena, except
that of the owner.
4. Landowners wishing to hold a single day or week-end motor sport event must apply for a special
conditional use permit.
5. There must be a 50' minimum setback from a track to the property line.
I
Sherburne County Zoning OrdinaDce
16.6 pg 1
AInended Apri16,2002
-7-
-/lAm L-AKE
CODE -
Ham Lake City Code
Article 4
\
/
ARTICLE 4 - NUISANCES AND OFFENSES
* 4-100 Public Nuisance Defined
Whoever by his act or failure to perform a legal duty intentionally does any of the
following is guilty of maintaining a public nuisance, which is a misdemeanor:
(1) Maintains. or permits a condition which unreasonably annoys, injures or
endangers the safety, health, morals, comfort, or repose of any considerable
number of members of the public; or
(2) Interferes with, obstructs, or renders dangerous for passage, any public highway
or right-of-way, or waters used by the public; or
(3) Is guilty of any other act or omission declared by law or this ordinance to be a
public nuisance and for which no sentence is specified.
4-200 Public Nuisances Affecting Health
The following are hereby declared to be nuisances affecting health:
(1) Exposed accumulation of decayed or unwholesome food or vegetable matter:
(2) All diseased animals running at large;
(3) All ponds or pools of stagnant water;
(4) Carcasses of animals not buried or destroyed within 24 hours after death;
(5) Accumulations of manure, refuse, or other debris;
(6) Privy vaults or garbage cans which are not rodent free or fly-tight or which are
so maintained as to constitute a health hazard or to emit foul and disagreeable
odors;
(7) The pollution of any public well or cistern, stream or lake, canal or body of
water by sewage, industriaf waste, or other substances;
(8) All noxious weeds and other rank growths of vegetation upon public or private
property;
(9) Dense smoke, noxious fumes, gas and soot, or cinders in unreasonable
quantities;
(10) All public exposure of persons having a contagious disease;
(11) Any offensive trade or business as defined by statute not licensed by the. County
board ofheal1i1 as defmed by law.
4-300 Public Nuisances Affecting Morals and Decency
The following are hereby declared to be nuisances affecting public morals and
decency:
(1) All gambling devices, slot machines, and punch boards, excepting licensed
(lawful) gaming activities.
(2) Betting, bookmaking, and all apparatus used in such occupations;
(3) All houses kept for the purpose of prostitution or promiscuous sexual
intercourse, gambling houses, houses of ill fame, and bawdy houses;
(4) All places where intoxicating liquor is manufactured or disposed of in violation
of law or where in violation of law, persons are permitted to resort for the
purpose of drinking intoxicating liquor, or where intoxicating liquor is kept for
sale or other disposition in violation of law, and all liquor and other property
used for maintaining such a place;
,
/
Page 2
-J-
*
/
/
Ham Lake City Code
Article 4
the City Council. Following such an inspection, the Building Official shall notify the
owner of the steps necessary to correct the deficiencies. The owner shall, within 30
days after receipt of such notice, either provide evidence of compliance, or shall
disable or dismantle the system. If after corrective action is required, additional false
alarms from the corrected system occur, the inspection steps (including fee) outlined
above shall be repeated, unti1l2 rnonths elapse in which no false alarms occur.
4-700 Noise
4-710
*
Definitions - The following definitions shall apply to this Article:
4-711 MPCA Definitions Adopted by Reference - The definitions of the
following terms shall be as found in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7030
(Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Noise Regulations), which are
hereby adopted by reference as if fully set forth herein: "A-Weighted";
"dB(A)"; "Decibel"; "Impulsive Noise"; "LIO"; "L50"; "Sound Pressure
Level" .
4-712 Additional Definitions
A) "Stationary Source" - noise which emanates from a source which
remains stationary;
B) "Mobile Source" - noise which emanates from a source which is either
in motion or capable of being in motion;
C) "Circulating Mobile Source" - noise which emanates from a Mobile
Source, but which source remains in a close proximity to a single location
(see Article 9-1250);
D) "Daytime" - those hours between 7:01 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.;
E) "Nighttime" - those hours between 10:01 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.;
F) "Personal Recreational Vehicle" - motorized vehicles designed for
usage by one person, sornetimes including a passenger, including, without
limitation, vehicles commonly known as snowmobiles, jetskis, motocross
bikes, motorized dirt bikes, motorcycles, motorbikes, go-carts, motorized
gliders, three-wheelers, four wheelers and ATV's;
G) "Residential Area" - any parcel of land upon which is situate a
residence;
H) "Excessive Noise" - noise received by a Residential Area which
exceeds an LIO of 65dB(A) during daytime, an LIO of 55dB(A) during
nighttime, an L50 of 60dB(A) during daytime, or an L50 of 50dB(A)
during nighttime.
I) "Permitted Excessive Noise" - Excessive Noise which is generated by
activities which are necessary to other residential uses, including, without
limitation, lawnmowing, snow removal, non-commercial lot clearing,
housing maintenance activities, hobby farming, gardening, residential
construction (including landscaping, repair, remodeling), vegetation
trimming or removal, sidewalk, patio or driveway construction.
J) "Abatable Excessive Noise" - Excessive Noise generated from any
source which is reasonably capable of being reduced by muffling, creating
barriers, or other means, so as to reduce the noise levels to levels which do
<
Page 9
-'1-
Ham Lake City Code
Article 4
"
not constitute Excessive Noise, or to levels which are significantly less
than the noise produced without abatement of any kind;
K) "Chronologically Pre-Existing Noise Source" - a Stationary Source of
Excessive Noise which existed prior to the establishment of Residential
Areas which receive Excessive Noise from the Stationary Source;
L) "Temporary Excessive Noise" - Excessive Noise which is generated by
construction projects which have been approved by the City, including
subdivision construction, building construction, excavation, dredging,
ditch cleaning, land clearing, street construction or utility
construction/repair;
4-720 Noise Nuisances - The following shall be considered Noise
Nuisances, and shall be prohibited (see 9-1250):
4-721 Generators of Excessive Noise - Any activity which produces
Excessive Noise, excepting those activities excepted under Article 4-722
below;
4-722 Personal Recreational Vehicle Noise - Noise generated by Personal
Recreational Vehicles which is received by any Residential Area, either as
a Stationary Source, a Mobile Source, or a Circulating Mobile Source, and
which exceeds 60dB(A) for any period of five consecutive minutes. <
4-723 Exceptions - The following activities shall be exempt from the
provisions of Article 4-721 above:
A) Permitted Excessive Noise;
B) Chronologically Pre-Existing Noise Sources, to the extent that the
activity does not constitute Abatable Excessive Noise. A Chronologically
Pre-Existing Noise Source which produces Abatable Excessive Noise shall
implement abatement techniques to reduce noise levels as much as is
practical. In the absence of an agreement between the City and the entity
producing the Excessive Noise as to what constitutes a reasonable
reduction in the noise levels generated, the practical level to which noise
shall be reduced shall be determined by the City Council, after reviewing
the following:
i) recommendations of a qualified and competent noise consultant;
ii) the financial consequences of requiring abatement;
iii) the degree to which occupants of Residential Areas affected by
the noise were or should have been aware of the noise prior to
taking up occupancy;
C) Generators of Temporary Excessive Noise;
I
Page 10
-10-
INFORMATION BRIEF
Minnesota House of Representatives
Research Department
600 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
ATV ?;;k :h,rce.
John Helland, Legislative Analyst
651-296-5039
May 2002
The A TV Laws for 2002
The continuing concern over all-terrain vehicle (ATV) use in state forests
and other public lands, and the designation of new trails for their travel,
led the 2002 Legislature to enact three separate laws dealing with ATVs.
These ATV provisions are contained in Laws of Minnesota 2002, chapters
351,353, and 355. In addition, the legislative auditor will evaluate
motorized recreational vehicle trails in 2002 and report his fIndings and
recommendations to the 2003 Legislature.
Chapter 351: Establishes Task Force
This chapter, part of the "omnibus game and fish law," stipulates that the Commissioner
of Natural Resources establish an off-highway vehicle task force. No identifIed number
of participants on the task force is named, but a balance of appropriate representatives is
noted. By January 15, 2003, the task force must issue recommendations to the
commissioner and legislative committees on:
. the number and location of motorized trails on state forest lands, and a time
frame for trail development;
. a process for trail planning and building development;
. current and future motorized trail management activities;
. changes in forest recreation rules;
. cost estimates for A TV trail activities;
. recreational interests of nonmotorized forest users;
. natural resource protection concerns from A TV trail use; and
. any related issues determined by the task force.
All of these ATV study items are contained in section 33 of the law.
This publication can be made available in alternative formats upon request. Please call 651-296-6753
(voice); or the Minnesota State Relay Service at 1-800-627-3529 (TrY) for assistance. Many House Research
Department publications are also available on the Internet at: w'vvvv.house.leg.state.mn.us/hrd/hrd.htm.
-1/-
. .:4/':~V.._7aj.t,L--ht/;-~"/~-==-
nUl fJ:;:JK..TTl€'Ce-..
'-
House Research Department
The A TV Laws for 2002
May 2002
Page 2
Chapter 353: Trails on Con-Con Land
The commonly termed "con-con law," which settled state jurisdiction on the consolidated
conservation lands in northwestern Minnesota, contains three sections that pertain to potential
A TV travel on those lands.
Section 1 requires the Commissioner of Natural Resources to designate at least 90 miles of ATV
trails on designated wildlife management areas on con-con lands. The designation must occur by
January 15,2004, must not include public roads, and must be within or contiguous to the wildlife
management areas. Under certain conditions, deer hunters using fIrearms may use A TV s in a
geographical area mainly adjacent to the Red Lake Indian Reservation.
Section 7 allows the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to issue citations for ATV
violations in wildlife management areas on con-con lands, under certain conditions. Warnings
would be given before citations are issued; this takes effect January 15,2004.
Section 8 requires the DNR to establish wildlife management area access "working groups" of
eight members in Beltrami, Marshall, and Roseau Counties. The working groups are to meet,
identify, and recommend to the commissioner potential ATV trail routes that are required by
section 1. The commissioner, in turn, must report on the results to the legislature by January 15,
2003 and 2004. .
Chapter 355: Recreational Use RuIes
Section 1 requires all ATVs purchased by the DNR to be manufactured in Minnesota.
Section 2 requires recreational area rules to be amended by the Commissioner of Natural
Resources as follows:
(a) On managed forest lands, motor vehicle operation may only occur on forest roads and
. trails that are not posted as closed;
(b) On limited forest lands, motor vehicle use may occur on forest roads not posted as closed,
and on forest trails posted to allow use;
(c) Except as provided in (b) above, on any forest lands a person may use an ATV off of a
forest trail when legally hunting or retrieving big game in the fall, or when legally
trapping;
(d) Allows motor vehicles in public forest areas for normal silviculture activities; and
(e) Allows a variance for clauses (a) and (b) above for landowners and leaseholders to access
their lands, if it's the only reasonable way to do so.
Section 6 contains an appropriation of $1 ,215,000 in fiscal year 2003 for the maintenance,
monitoring, enforcement, and environmental review of public lands and trails for ATV use.
-/2---
Counc;.Imember K111gnr SLaLl::U all";! 1l~LC;l.llH5 .v LU,", ~~~-- -- ---
alternative to this.
Mo l Orttel, Seconded byTrude, to approve Item No. 22 (Fencing QuoteslOl-2/Ball Field West
of High Scho d Mr. Eveland would clear trees and grubbing where the fence will be installed.
Mayor Gamache asked why they oing with an eight-foot fence in one area. Mr. Erickson stated
the higher fencing should deflect the fou n the one field. The other fields should not have that
problem.
Councilmember Knight asked Mr. Eveland ifhe has cattle on his prope t all times. Mr. Eveland
stated he does. Councilmember Knight asked if they should put up signs statm trespassing or
something like this. Mayor Gamache stated staff should talk to Mr. Haas and let him 1a1
one is allowed over the fences for their safety.
Motion carried unanimously.
/d~ I~ c;y (1utlq! 1lti,,4v( 7 ;;71tJ z- J
tJ. RECEIVE RESIDENT REQUEST/ORDINANCE #109 CHANGES
Mr. Neumeister stated an Andover resident has requested that Ordinance #109 (Regulating All
Terrain Vehicles and Snowmobiles) be amended to also regulate the use of dirt bikes in the City of
Andover. The resident has indicated that numerous times a neighbor has ridden dirt bikes very close
to their home and it is very irritating to them. The resident has called numerous times to complain
about the neighbor to City Council and Staff. City staff has indicated that it is a rural area in which
they live and this is typical of what occurs in those areas.
) Councilmember Orttel asked what the regulation is, are A TV's and snowmobiles only regulated on
public property. Mr. Neumeister stated he did not have an answer because he did have the regulation
with him. Councilmember Jacobson stated on of the problems in the Ordinance is that the noise has
to be over a fifteen-minute period, and with dirt bikes, it varies so much that this would not apply.
Mayor Gamache stated the rationale given by the resident needs to be taken into consideration.
Mr. Erar stated the item discussing was presented to staff within the last two days and they do not
have a lot of staff comment of analysis regarding this. He stated the Council has receipt of this item
and information on interest the Council has regarding this Ordinance.
Mayor Gamache asked Mr. Dickinson if he had any information on the Ordinance in Sherburne
County. Mr. Dickinson stated the Ordinance is very controversial and are possibly looking at
repealing it. Another issue is enforcing the Ordinance.
Councilmember Jacobson stated they should turn this issue over to staff to discuss with the Attorney
and come back to the Council with a recommendation.
Y LICENSING/MORATORlUM UPDATE
ouncil meeting interest was expressed in making
. r__
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
/ Minutes - October 15, 2002
Pagel2
ntil they could review the information.
Moti by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, to table Item No. 24 (Lot Split Request/I 6030 Makah Street
NW) fo esearch to be done on this item. Motionpassed 4 ayes, 1 nay (Jacobson).
'ARD SETBACK V AR1ANCE/17536 QUAY A VENUE NW
t is proposing to build a 24-foot by 24-foot addition onto the second level
above the existing garage. e home is non-conforming due to its 20-foot corner side yard setback
where 40 feet is the minimum lowable in the R-3 zoning district. A variance is needed to correct
the non-conforming status of the isting home to allow the project to move forward. The addition
over the garage on the south side 0 e home will not change the existing setbacks of the home in
relation to l7 6th Avenue.
/
Councilmember Jacobson stated he had this lled because he is in favor ofletting them do what
they want to do but what they are doing is granti a variance for a twenty-foot setback. Right now
this is a non-conforming use and by doing this, the are saying a twenty-foot setback is ok. In his
mind, it makes it a conforming use so if it burns down d they wanted to put another addition on or
garage on, they could do it without coming back for ap oval as long as they met all the other
requirements. If they wanted to keep it a non-conforming us but allow them to build the addition,
that is a different way of doing the same thing. Mr. Neumeis stated their Ordinance does not
allow them to add onto a non-conforming building until i is made to be conforming.
Councilmember Jacobson asked if they could vary from it. Mr. Ne ister stated he did not think
they could because it is a use issue and they cannot vary from the use.
Motion by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, to approve Item No.6 (Approve ideyard Setback
Variance/17536 Quay Street NW). Motion carried unanimously. (See Resolutio 161-02)
.. RECEIVE RESIDENT REQUEST/ORDINANCE #109 CHANGES (CONTINUED)
Will Neumeister, Community Development Director, stated they had a request from an Andover
resident to amend Ordinance #109 (Regulating All Terrain Vehicles and Snowmobiles) to regulate
the use of dirt bikes in the City of Andover. City Staff received language that the property owner
would like to have the City adopt. The property owners who had the complaints filed against them
have also written a letter explaining their view of the situation, which they consider to be harassment.
Councilmember Jacobson stated he observed that the question is not restrictions on dirt bikes
themselves, it is the noise created. Instead of an Ordinance or banning them, would it be more useful
/ for the Planning and Zoning Commission to look at requiring quieter mufflers.
Ms. Mary Hilke, l8030 Uplander Court stated they have been dealing with their neighbor on this
issue for about three years. She stated she is an avid ATV owner and the reason she has come to
-11-
/
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - October 15, 2002
Page 13
the City Council is because their neighbor using dirt bikes has blatantly abused them. Their neighbor
runs many dirt bikes at one time around his property and they cannot enjoy their own home because
of the noise. She stated they have called the police but were told they could not do anything because
Andover does not have an Ordinance.
Ms. Hilke stated she believes Andover is a rapidly growing community and it is only going to get
worse. She does not believe in banning recreational vehicles but something needs to be done. She
would like to see something go into effect that is enforceable. She contacted Ham Lake and they
have a good dirt bike ordinance but it is under the noise ordinance. She stated she did call the
sheriff s department and got a report for the last six months of complaints. There have been about 36
or 40 complaints. She stated Andover needs to have something to enforce the orindnance to protect
the citizens who do not want to listen to the noise.
Councilmember Trude asked if the property owners own all the vehicles. Ms. Hilke stated they also
have friends over to ride bikes.
/
Mr. Tom Danshek, l5584 Raven Street stated he felt Ordinance #109 should be amended to place
stricter controls on the abusive operations of A TV's, snowmobiles and dirt bikes for safety and noise
reasons. He stated he has neighbors that have created a track for A TV's in their backyard and ride
from morning to night. He stated he has four children and they cannot play in the backyard because
of safety reasons and they cannot enjoy their deck or backyard because of the noise. He stated there
should be certain exclusions allowed in the amendment, such as people using ATV's for work
purposes on their property.
Councilmember Orttel asked what size lots are around the neighborhood. Mr. Danshek stated they
are 2.5 acres.
Councilmember Trude stated she would like to look at Ham Lake's noise ordinance concerning this.
Mr. Dickinson stated the legislature has selected people to research the A TV situation and evaluate
not only City Ordinances but also the States enforcement of this.
The Council consensus is to have the Planning Commission review Item No. 28 (Resident
Request/Ordinance # 109 Changes) and look into the safety with possibly looking into the noise issue
and make recommendations to the Council.
\
/
cllmember Jacobson asked if the property owners wanted this to be rezoned. Mr. Neumel
. -IS"-
\
(Ji;
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - November 12, 2002
Page II
PUBLIC HEARING: DISCUSS PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCES
#109 AND #230 REGULATING DIRT BIKES IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
Mr. McKay explained that a number of Andover residents have requested changes to
Ordinance #109 (Regulating All Terrain Vehicles and Snowmobiles) be amended to also
regulate the use of dirt bikes and to increase the regulation of A TV's in the City of
Andover. There have also been other complaints by Andover residents about the noise,
dust and fumes associated with the racing of dirt bikes, A TV's and other vehicles on and
off tracks on residential lots. The City Council directed this to be discussed by the
Planning Commission and requested for more information in regard to the Ham Lake
ordinance, the A TV Taskforce and a confirmation of the number of complaints filed to
the Sheriffs office.
Mr. McKay discussed other cities Ordinance's with the Planning Commission.
Acting Chairperson Daninger stated Mr. McKay mentioned nineteen complaints, does he
know how many different addresses this is from. Mr. McKay stated the sheriff's report
he received does not have a lot of information.
Motion by Falk., seconded by Larsen, to open the public hearing at 8:30.m. Motion
carried on a 4-ayes, O-nays, 3-absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote.
Mrs. Mary Hilke, 18030 Uplander Court stated she is one of the residents requesting dirt
bikes be included in the current Ordinance. She read a letter to the Commission and
presented her viewpoint.
Mr. Tom Dancheck, 15584 Raven Street stated they feel Ordinance 109 needs to be
modified to address a setback distance from the property line and residents and needs to
address the repetitive operation of dirt bikes on trails and private properties. He stated
they are not trying to ban motorized vehicle use in the City, they are trying to create a
buffer. He discussed his issues and viewpoint with the Commission.
Mr. Pat Roberts, 18030 Uplander Court stated he would like to add that in talking to
Anoka County Sheriff's Department, the noise ordinance is unenforceable as written.
Andover's snowmobile and ATV Ordinance is written for public property. This means
that a resident can do whatever they like on their own property with no regard to their
neighbors. He read from the Ordinance and asked if this could be changed to include dirt
bikes and A TV's for public property also.
/
Mr. Brian Flute, 15667 Raven Street stated there were a couple ofissues he would like to
clarify in regards to the track described by Mr. Dancheck. He stated the track was built
for safety and curves so it slows the traffic down. The issue arose because neighbors
refused to communicate and work with each other. He stated after understanding of the
issue, the amount the kids have been allowed to ride has decreased and the rules for
riding have changed and been followed. He stated he has a problem with people that
-l~~
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - November 12, 2002
, Page 12
I
want to change because the City is changing. He stated he has a list of neighbors that
agree with him. He stated some of the numbers forbid 2.5 acres from riding. He stated
they want to make it clear that by the petition, they want to reserve the right to operate on
their property. He stated the majority of people moved out to Andover to do be able to
ride. He cautioned the Commission to look at the lots and not just the dimensions.
Mr. Jim Linahan, 665 l48th Lane stated he owns two and a half acres and moved to
Andover from North Minneapolis because he wanted to get away from all the regulations.
By putting the setback restrictions in place, the residents cannot do anything on their
property. He stated if the setbacks were enforced, this would force people to own more
laQd, which is impossible in Andover.
Mr. John Swoosher, 1433 161st Avenue NW stated his concern was finding out the
setbacks seemed so excessive and unreasonable. He stated he does not have a dirt bike or
A TV or snowmobile. He stated his concern is seeing what seemed to be stunning figures
for the change in the Ordinance. He stated residents need some type of resolution other
than the sheriffs' department.
Mr. Dan Barrett, 17271 Partridge Street NW stated they moved to Andover in 1993 from
Minnetonka for the added acreage. He stated they have not had any complaints or police
calls. He stated he feels sympathy for what Ms. Hilke is going through but he hates to
see the entire City affected by a couple of people who do not follow the rules.
Mr. Dan Benedict, 15638 Raven Street stated he lives next door to Mr. Dancheck. He
stated they invited the entire City Council over to see the trail they have complained
about and Mayor Gamache showed up. He stated they rode the trail for about forty
minutes and was amazed. Mayor Gamache stated this was one of the safety trails he has
seen. He stated the trail is completely lined with trees and there is not an issue that
someone could cross over the property lines from the trail. He stated their four wheelers
have never been started at 8:00 a.m. He stated the noise ordinance issue is great and if
anyone of the vehicles exceeds the Cities limits for over a minute, they should be made
to change the vehicle to be remufflered. He stated there are three other neighbors that
would like to connect the trail together to create a larger trail to ride. He stated he feels
for Mr. & Mrs. Hilke and stated that something needed to be in regards to their issue.
Mr. John Stong, 2333 l55th Lane NW stated they live on a lot that is 200 by 400 feet and
if the Ordinance changed to 300 feet, it would make their yard unusable. He stated they
have no complaints from neighbors when riding their A TV's. He stated he cannot hear
his neighbors running their ATV's but occasionally they do hear a dirt bike running in the
distance constantly.
Ms. Patty Howard, 2119 l56tb Avenue stated she understands the issues with dirt bikes
\ but some of the families have gone out of their way to make sure riding their ATV's does
/ not disturb their neighbors. She stated the neighbors are concerned about what their kids
are doing. She stated they are living in a rural area and the kids generally ride with care.
-17---
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - November 12, 2002
Page 13
,
She stated as a landowner, they have a right to do what they want on their property as
long as no laws are broken. If there needs to be limitations, she understands that but she
does not want privileges taken away. She stated she does not want to see the rights ofthe
landowner taken away. She stated the kids deserve the opportunity to ride recreational
vehicles as long as the rules are obeyed.
Mr. Dancheck stated he did not propose the 300-foot setback, staff proposed this. He
suggested a minimal setback. He also did not state there was continuous use. He stated
that comparisons to leaf blowers and lawn mowers are a distinct difference between these
types of operations versus optional riding vehicles.
Mr. Flute stated he wanted to clarify that on the trails they ride, the kids cannot speed
through where they are going. They have never crossed the property line and the kids
riding know what they are doing and the safety issues. He stated the track was designed
for safety. He stated this is not a racetrack and if the kids are caught racing or timing, the
machines are put away for a long time and it is taken very seriously.
Mr. Roberts stated that they have to appreciate the people that have moved to Andover
for a little peace and quiet.
/
Ms. Hilke stated that as snowmobilers, they went through this a few years ago and she
thinks this is something that is happening and as communities grow, they have to look at
what is best for the community and she urges everyone to become active to open up some
of the forests trails.
Motion by Falk, seconded by Larsen, to close the public hearing at 9:23 p.m. Motion
carried on a 4-ayes, O-nays, 3-absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote.
Commissioner Kirchoff stated the issues that certain parties are experiencing are real. He
stated he couldn't support adding new regulations everywhere. He asked ifhe could
drive a snowmobile on his property south of 161 st. He stated the noise ordinance should
be enforced. He asked if they have a noise ordinance. Mr. McKay stated they do but the
Sheriffhas stated that by the time they get to the property, the activity is done so it is hard
to enforce. He stated the Sheriff's Department does not consider this an issue.
Acting Chairperson Daninger stated they should have staff look at what would make for a
more enforceable noise ordinance because there is a concern on how to enforce this.
Commissioner Falk stated he does not want restrictions but it is an issue between two
neighbors. They need to take this issue as a whole for the entire community.
\
/
Commissioner Larsen stated she did not think it is just a one-neighborhood issue. She
stated they need to be sensitive to the people who moved here for some peace and quiet
and the noise is the issue and she would like to find a solution for this.
~lr-
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - November 12, 2002
Page 14
Acting Chairperson Daninger stated because of a few incidents, this comes to the City's
attention and they need to look at this as a whole. He believes the responsible riders in
the area will comply with the current Ordinances. He stated he is not in favor of a buffer
zone at this time. He stated they needed to look into checking the noise ordinance and
how to help the law enforcement enforce this. Mr. McKay stated he would talk to the
law enforcement on how to enforce this.
Commissioner Larsen stated she would be in favor of some type of buffer zone.
Commissioner Falk stated it would be nice for neighbors to try to work things out for
themselves because he cannot see a buffer zone as being the solution.
Acting Chairperson Daninger stated the direction is to look more at the noise and how to
enforce this.
Mr. Bednarz stated that this item would be before the Council at the December 3, 2002
City Council meeting.
omER BUSINESS.
Mr. Bednarz updated the Planning Commission on related items.
,
/
Mr. Bednarz mentioned that the City would be holding an open house for the Rural
Reserve Study. This will be held on November 20, 2002 at 4:30 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT.
Motion by Falk, seconded by Larsen, to adjourn the meeting at 9:36 p.m. Motion carried
on a 4-ayes, O-nays, 3-absent (Greenwald, Gamache, Squires) vote.
Respectfully Submitted,
Sue Osbeck, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
\,
/
-l'{-,
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - December 3, 2002
Page 17
arages. He stated the covenants would enforce the no parking, tow away zone and he could
o set the front fal(ade of the houses a foot.
Counc ember Trude stated he has the decorative fence running parallel to the front door and
creates th . lusion of homes being lined up. Mr. Bahn was not sure if there would be a fence in
the front yar. e homes would all be unique and the purpose of the detached garage is to have
a quiet backyard . out the noise of the six-lane expressway.
Staff has asked Mr. Bahn t onsider setting aside an easement for a City monument
identification sign and Mr. B ted he would agree to this as long as it was done tastefully.
Mr. Bahn stated the neighborhood m ting went well.
Mayor Gamache stated he thought the buffe he was putting in does a lot and looks nice.
Councilmember Trude stated initially she was not e about this and then realized it is a nice
transition from the homes in the area and the homes in dover. She appreciated his adding the
measurements between the homes. She stated it seemed lik 's is a good use of the property.
Mr. Bahn stated he did not think it would be feasible to build thre ouses on this property.
Councilmember Trude stated this will add a lot of value to the neigh
Mr. Gary Jtttt; 13:; 14 Silverfod Court, starea he lives behind Mr. Bahn's prope
led a neighborhood opposition to any commercial business going into this property. as at
the neighborhood meeting and they look at this as a plus for the neighborhood. He stated
neighbors are in support of this development.
---. .....
/'S&) DISCUSSION OF RESIDENT'S REQUEST TO REGULATE DIRT BIKES
~ Community Development Neumeister stated a number of Andover residents have requested
Ordinance #109 (Regulating All Terrain Vehicles and Snowmobiles) be amended to also regulate
the use of dirt bikes and to increase the regulation of A TV s in the City. There have been other
complaints by Andover residents about the noise, dust and fumes associated with the racing of
dirt bikes, A TV s and other vehicles on and off tracks on residential lots. The City Council
directed this to be discussed by the Planning Commission and requested more information in
regard to the Ham Lake ordinance, the ATV Taskforce and a confirmation of the number of
complaints filed with the Sheriff's office. The Planning and Zoning Commission gave staff
direction to look into increased enforcement of the noise ordinance.
Mr. Neumeister recapped the information from other cities regarding what they did regarding dirt
bikes and the noise problems.
/
Mr. Neumeister stated there was an additional letter from Ms. Hilke regarding her view on a dirt
bike Ordinance.
The Council discussed the issue of using a decibel meter to regulate the noise ordinance and the
-20-
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - December 3, 2002
Page 18
pros and cons related to using the meter.
Councilmember Jacobson stated that the question is how to solve the noise problem. If they have
an Ordinance they cannot enforce, the Ordinance is not any good. He thinks the manufacturers of
these vehicles make the mufilers to comply with cities' Ordinances and they need to establish
some sort of Ordinance stating they would need a noise-reducing mufiler that would comply with
the best technology. He does not know if they have the capability to do this. Councilmember
Orttel stated there are a couple of problems with this. Oe is the Officer would have no legal right
to go onto the property to check the mufiler. He does not think there is any way they can enforce
this.
Further discussion ensued regarding the enforcement of the Noise Ordinance.
Councilmember Jacobson stated he thought it was important for residents to understand that the
City does not want to ban the machines:
Councilmember Trude stated she had a phone call from someone who sold their home because of
the noise made by dirt bikes. She asked how they could balance this to accommodate all the
homeowners. .
A resident stated most of the people riding ATVs do not have vehicles that are as loud as a
lawnmower. If most people who have A TV s have stock exhausts, this would not exceed the
decibel reading and the Council should have staff ask residents to come and check their mufilers
and if it exceeds the noise level, ask them to fix it. Use it as a positive thing not negative. He
stated he is concerned with the City taking away the rights of the residents.
Further discussion ensued regarding regulations and the issue of noise.
Councilmember Orttel stated the problem is Andover is in a transition and things are changing
and during that they run into a lot of opposition. There are other issues besides the noise.
Mr. Terry Krause, 17241 Partridge Street, stated a constant noise can be zoned out but a
continuous whining noise is very annoying. He stated they could come out with a decibel meter
and read it but it would be the same thing as a radar detector where if seen, the noise will stop
until the enforcement is gone.
Mrs. Lynne Krause stated she would like to have the Council sit out on her deck and experience
the noise from both sides of their house. She hoped the Council would consider changing
something for those people who moved to Andover for the peace and quiet and wildlife.
/
Mr. Tom Dancheck, 15584 Raven Street, stated the issue is the close proximity. They do not
have a problem with the noise, but the close proximity. The other issue is with small children
next to the track. He talked to the MPCA and there are three primary components associated
with noise: the noise source, the distance of the noise source to the recipient and the attenuation
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes - December 3, 2002
Page 19
of the surrounding environment. He stated the easiest of these to control is the distance and the
MPCA stated a fifty-foot setback would result in a thirty percent reduction in noise; a hundred
foot setback would result in fifty percent noise reduction. He showed the Council a graph with
noise versus distance dealing strictly with A TV s.
Councilmember Trude asked if this was based on his assumptions or actual observations. Mr.
Dancheck stated this is based on Colorado State Park ATV Noise Measurements and the MPCA
Noise Decatur Rate. This scenario is based on one ATV traveling less than twenty-five miles an
hour with a standard muffler and measurements taken at fifty feet. They tried to validate the
information with readings on their own property and it was consistent with the chart. The MPCA
told him if they have multiple A TV s, it significantly increases the noise level. Two A TV s
running at the same time would increase the noise level by fifteen percent and even if one A TV
met the local noise ordinance, if they add the multiple vehicles, it would be outside the local
noise ordinance.
Councilmember Knight stated the calls he has been getting are mainly dealing with dirt bikes.
Councilmember Orttel asked how an officer tags vehicles for a loud muffler. Attorney Hawkins
,/ stated it is a subjective call. He stated they would need to have an officer stay on the site for an
hour to gcttenpercem ofareadouL
Mr. Dan Bennington, 15638 Raven Street, stated he invited all the Councilmembers out to see
his track and Mayor Gamache came out and rode the trail for forty minutes. He stated most
riders would allow the City to come out and test their vehicles on their own property. This
would be a great learning experience for the riders. He is for raising the fine for people who
abuse the noise ordinance. He stated they should add to the Ordinance that in order to have an
ATV or dirt bike in Andover, they must have them tested for noise.
Mr. Dave Solarz, 2351 180th Avenue NW stated all his dirt bikes have OEM mufflers and his.
trail is more than fIfty feet away from the property line. His kids have not been allowed to ride
before 11:00 am or after 8:00 pm and are not typically out there for more than fifteen minutes.
He recognizes the machines make noise but he does have a right to enjoy his property to some
extent and feels this is reasonable. He does not know what the solution is.
Councilmember Jacobson asked Mr. Erar if staff was planning to train a few staff members on
the use of the decibel meter. Mr. Erar stated if the Council would request it, they could but they
would also like to have a few deputies trained in on the equipment also.
Mr. Erar stated if a resident would volunteer to have their equipment tested, they could contact
Mr. Neumeister to have this done. This would be a good positive step towards working with the
City on this.
;'
Mr. Bennington stated when the City is ready to test the decibel meter, they could use his
property.
......2-1-
XAlr6E'i C:c-rV A/EW5LEI'/E~
..5ef're.mbe4 / 0 C'1?;/:'u/ ZOOS;--
'\
J
CITY NEWSLETIER. WWW.CI.RAMSEy.MN.US.SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER2005.VOLUME20.No. 4
.IIJ1 FALL W ATERMAIN
.. FLUSHING IN OCTOBER
The City of Ramsey Utility Department will be
doing their semi-annual flushing of water mains begin-
ning Monday, October lOth through Friday, October 21 st.
Please be aware that this flushing, while it is necessary,
will create a disturbance in the system causing low pres-
sure and it may cause your water to be discolored. Al-
though the water may be discolored by rust, it is fit for
human consumption but it may stain clothes that are
being washed. To alleviate this problem, you may want
to fill your washer with water and check on its clarity
before adding your clothes. We appreciate your pa-
tience and regret any inconvenience that this may cause.
Questions or comments call Utility Lead Worker John
Nelson@ 763-427-8254.
ALPINE PARK RECEIVES NEW
RECREATIONAL AMENITIEs!
I
On June 9'h, 2005, residents, city officials, and the Ramsey
Rotary celebrated the opening of a new playground at Alpine
Park. The site, within the park dubbed the 'Discovery Garden',
features a wood 'forest ranger tower' with various play events
and is complimented by a wooden swing and seating area made
of large stones. The theme for the play area invites users to
discover various elements of the natural and manmade
environment - via a one-quarter mile long game in the landscape!
Instructions for the game as well as an interpretation of the parks
flora and fauna are located on the kiosk. Other improvements
for park goers include irrigation of the park's entrance, as well
as a drinking fountain for people and their pets.
A special thank you is extended to Ramsey Rotary for
providing funding for the trees, landscape plantings and
comfortablc bcnches! The park is located west of Sunfish Lake
Boulevard at 6600 Alpine Drive.
Pictured at the ribbon cutting (from left to right) arc; Josh & Maddy Norman and
other neighborhood children (in and on the tower); Mark Riverbtood. Parks and
Utilities Supervisor (holding ribbon); Todd Cook, City Councilmember; James
Pontius, Park and Recreation Commission; Mayor Tom Gamee (with scissors);
James Norman, City Administrator (partially on tower, behind the Mayor); Jill
Johns, Chair, Park and Recreation Commissioner (with scissors); John Satrorn,
Ramsey Rotary President; David E1vig, Councilmcrnbcr~ AI Pearson
Councilmernber; David Jeffrey, Council member; Mark Lehman, Park and
/ Recreation Commission; Tom LaMere, Park and Recreation Commission~ Sarah
Strommen, Council member (behind LaMere); Melody Shryock, Park and
Recreation Commission; Susan Anderson, Ramsey Rotary; Peter Morales and
family, Project Stone Carver; and Leonard Linton, Civil Engineer II (holding
ribbon).
- Zz.-
NEW RECREATIONAL
VElllCLE ORDINANCE!
<
Effective September 2005. recreational
vehicles MAY NOT be operated south of the 16700
block in the City. Recreational vehicles may be
operated only on the operator's property, on privatc
property with written permission, or on private property
posted that "recreational vehicles are allowed" in this
area.
This new recreational vehicle ordinance is being
implemented to provide reasonable regulations for the
operation of snowmobiles, all-terrain vehiclcs, off-
highway motorcycles and other recreational vehicles on
public and private property within thc City of Ramsey.
An area for loading and unloading of
snowmobiles andATV's will be available in the parking
lots of Central and Elmcrest Parks, with a route available
to access the designated use area, north of the 16700
block.
If you have questions regarding thc new
recreational vehicle ordinance, please contact the
Ramsey Police Department at 763-427-6812.
,;;..
,
/
\
)
c0'd
CITY OF RAMSEY
RECREATIONAL VEHICLE
ORDINANCE
09/07l0S
6.04 Recreational Vehicles
6.04.01 Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to provide reasonable regulations
for the use of Snowmobiles, All-Terrain Vehicles (ATV), Off-Highway Motorcycles and
other Recreational Vehicles on public and private property in the City. This section is not
intended to allow what the Minnesota State Statutes expressly prohibit nor to prohibit
what the State Statutes allow. . It is intended to prevent a public nuisance.
6.04.02 Incorporation of Sections. Any person operating a Recreational Vehicle
within the City, unless provided otherwise herein, shall be subject to the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes 84.81 through 84.929, inclusive, as amended, and the regulations of
the Commissioner of Natural Resources ("Commissioner"), adopted pursuant thereto. All
provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 169 and l69A shall apply to the operation of
Recreational Vehicles except those that by nature have no application.
6.04.03 Definitions. For the purposes of this Section, the words and tenus listed
below shall be defmed as follows:
Agricultural Zone _ shall mean the areas in Minnesota lying south and
west of a line along the following highway rights-of-way: starting at the North Dakota
border, the line goes east along State Highway 10 to State Highway 23, then follows
Highway 23 east to State Highway 95, which it follows to the Wisconsin border.
All Terrain Vehicle (ATV) - shall mean a motorized flotation-tired
vehicle of not less than three (3) but not more than six (6) low pressure tires.
Boulevard _ shall mean that portion of the street or highway between the
roadway and private property.
City - shall mean the City of Ramsey, Anoka County, Minnesota.
Council - shall mean the City Council of the City of Ramsey.
Designated Non-Use Area - shall mean that area south of a straight line
running from east to west at the l6700 block, starting at the Rum River on the east and
running to the City of Elk River border on the west. Within the Non-Use Area, access to
L0:50 S00c-50-d3S
-2,5-
'";>
'.
/
I
)
....
Elmcrest Park and Central Park will be made and restricted to loading and unloading of
snowmobiles and ATV's in the parking lots only. A designated route from the parking lot
will be clearly posted to allow access to 167th Ave from Elmcrest Park. A designated
route from the parking lot of Central Park will be clearly posted to allow access to
Annstrong Blvd for direct northbound travel to the Designated Use Area.
Designated Use Area - shall mean the area north of a straight line
running from east to west at the 16700 block, starting at the Rum River on the east and
running to the City of Elk River border on the west.
Mini-Bikes _ shall mean small, two wheeled motorized devices designed
for off-road operation. Mini-bikes may include miniature motorcycles and do not qualify
as a moped, motorcycle or an ATV.
Go-Carts _ shall mean a low, four-wheeled motorized device with an
open or closed frame designed and used for off-road operation.
Off-highway Motorcycle (OHM) - shall mean vehicles traveling on two
wheels with a seat to be straddled by the operator with handlebars for steering control.
OHM's may include some "dirt bikes".
Operate _ shall mean to ride in or on, and control the operation of a
Recreational Vehicle.
Operator _ shall mean every person who operates, or is in actual physical
control of a Recreational Vehicle.
Person _ shall mean an individual, partnership, corporation, the State and
its agencies and subdivisions, and any body of persons, whether incorporated or not.
Public Property - shall mean property that may be used by the public,
subject to reasonable regulation by a governmental body. Such property includes City
parks, City parking lots and public school parking lots and grounds.
Recreational Vehicle - shall mean All-Terrain Vehicles, Snowmobiles,
Off-Highway Motorcycles, Mini Bikes, Go-Carts, and other motorized vehicles, that by
their use, fit this defmition.
Roadway _ shall mean that portion of a street or highway improved,
designed or ordinarily used for vehicular travel but not including the boulevard. For the
purposes of this section, Roadways not dedicated for public use and not maintained by
the City are not included within this definition.
Semi-Public Property - shall mean private property generally for use by
the public but not owned or maintained by a governmental body. Such property includes
m'd
80:60 S00c-60-d3S
-z'f-
/
)
without limitation: church property, shopping center property and other property
generally used by patrons of a commercial or private business establishment.
Snowmobile - shall mean a self-propelled vehicle designed for travel on
snow or ice steered by skis or runners.
Street or Highway - shall mean the entire width between boundary lines
of any way or place when any part thereof is open to the use of the public, as a matter of
right, for the purpose of vehicular traffic (includes the right-of-way or boulevard). For
the purposes of this section, Streets or Highways not dedicated for public use and not
maintained by the City are not included within this definition.
Test Drive - shall mean the operation of a recreational vehicle for
evaluation purposes.
6.04.04
Operation Limitations
Subdivision 1. Non-Designated Use Areas. Recreational Vehicles may
not be operated in the Non-Designated Use areas except in those limited areas where
permitted, as described in the definitions hereof.
Subd.2. Designated Use Areas. Recreational Vehicles may be operated
only in the areas defined herein as the Designated Use Areas and then only as follows:
a. On the operator's property subject to the provisions of this Section.
b.. On privately owned property if the operator has in possession written
permission from the property owner; or, on privately owned property
if the property owner has posted a clearly visible notice indicating
"Recreational Vehicles Allowed" or words substantially similar.
c. On trunk highways, county state aid roads or county roads within the
Designated Use Area as regulated by State Statute.
e. On City streets within the Designated Use Area only as allowed by
State Statute.
f. On public or semi-public property within the Designated Use Area
only if said property is clearly posted with signs designating the area
or specific areas as open to Recreational Vehicles.
Subd. 3. Specific Limitations for Operation of ATV's and
Snowmobiles. No All-Terrain Vehicles or Snowmobiles may be operated within the
right-of-way, including the ditch of a trunk, county state-aid, or county highway from
170'd
80:60 S00c-60-d3S
-Z5"~
,
April 1 to August 1 within the Designated Use Area as part of Minnesota's Agricultural
Zone.
Subd.4. Hours of Operation. No Recreational Vehicle may be operated
any place in the City between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. Sunday through
Friday, and between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. Saturday and Sunday.
Subd. 5. Snow-cover. From November 1 to March 31, Recreational
Vehicles shall not be operated off the Operator's property or the property of another that
the Operator has written permission to be on, unless there is a minimum six (6) inches of
snow cover on the ground.
6.04.05 Towing Restriction. It is unlawful for any person to operate a
Recreational Vehicle so as to tow any person or thing on a street or highway except
through thtl use of n rigid tow n:1r, as defined by State Statute, attached to the rear of the
Recreational Vehicle.
6.04.06 Equipment Requirements. No Recreational Vehicle shall be operated
within the City unless it is equipped with the following:
a. Brakes adequate to control the movement of, and to stop and hold
the Recreational Vehicle under any condition of operation.
b. When operated between the hours of one-half hour before sunrise,
one-half hour after sunset, or at any time of reduced visibility,
Recreational Vehicles shall have at least one clear lamp attached to
the front, with sufficient intensity to reveal persons and vehicles at a
distance of at least 100 feet ahead during the hours of darkness under
normal atmospheric conditions. The recreational vehicle shall also be
equipped with at least one red tail lamp plainly visible under normal
atmospheric conditions.
c. Standard mufflers which are properly attached and in constant
operation and which reduce the noise of operation of the motor to the
minimum necessary for operation. Use of a muffler cutout, bypass,
straight pipe or similar device is prohibited. The exhaust system
shall not emit or produce a sharp popping or cracking sound.
d. Snowmobiles must have reflective material of at least 16 square
inches on each side forward of the handlebars, so as to reflect lights
at a 90-degree angle.
6.04.07 Test Driving. Recreational vehicles may be "test driven" within the
designated use area as follows:
-\
S0'd
60:60 S00c-60-d3S
-Z/,-
90'd ltllOl.
:.-
.'
a. Test drives shall only take place in an area clearly posted with signs
designating the area as a test site.
b. Drivers shall wear helmet with a clearly visible orange stripe.
6.04.08 Map. A map showing the boundaries ofthe Designated Use and Non-Use
Areas shall be on display at the City Hall and the police Department for public viewing,
during normal business hours.
6.04.09 Misdemeanor. Whoever violates any provision ofthis Section 6.04 shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by 90 days in jail and/or a fine of $700.
/
\
)
90'd
01:60 S00c-60-d3S
-1-7--
1'.1
....
~
~
-2$-
CITY OF
NDOVE
GJ
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: 2006-2010 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Update
DATE: September 27,2005
Attached is an updated draft 2006-2010 City of Andover Capital Improvement Plan based on
discussion at previous Council Workshops and ajoint meeting with the Parks Commission. This
draft plan is submitted to continually gain City Council comments on the plan and to use as a tool
for the 2006 City of Andover Budget review process.
\
The following is a summary of changes, ongoing research, or notations made after previous
reviews with the Council:
l. Vehicle replacement justification should not mention "scheduled replacement". All
vehicle replacements should be justified with: a) increased maintenance issues/costs, b)
safety issues or lack there of, c) etc. Department updating of the narratives is ongoing.
2. City Hall Garage Expansion - keep in the CIP, but bring back to Council before building.
Council not sure of the location and has concerns that additional stalls would block the
view of the Community Center.
3. Fire Station #l Auxiliary Generator - see if we can purchase and install with remaining
bond proceeds. Finance determined there are sufficient proceeds to complete this project,
and formal approval from the City Council to proceed in 2005 was given on September
20th.
4. Mezzanine Area, Building A - project cost reduction from $27k to $20k. Previous
mezzanine was $lOk in 2002, a quote received in 2005 was $15k.
5. Public Works Development Planning - project budget was reduced from $25k to $lOk.
Most ofthe work will be done in-house and minimal consultant service will be used. It is
anticipated that a presentation will be made to the Council yet late this fall on some of the
planning.
-'
6. All Fire Trucks - moved out at least a year, and grant funds are being pursued.
Justification generally states that trucks should last 20 to 25 yrs so 1991 trucks shouldn't
be considered until 2011 unless significant maintenance/safety issues arise. Department
updating ofthe narratives is ongoing.
7. Lawn Sweeper - revisit the necessity of this type of equipment and does the amount of
use substantiate the expenditure. Department review is ongoing.
8. All Park Projects Parking Lots - the necessity of curb and gutter in the parks - estimates
for urban parks will include curb and gutter, but the ultimate decision will be made by the
Council on a case by case basis when the park project is formally authorized.
9. All Park Projects - narratives were update for the recent joint City Council and Park
Commission meeting. This is an ongoing task.
10. MSA contribution projects including some of the following detail: Hanson Blvd / 139th
Ave Intersection; Hanson Blvd /133 Ave intersection - moved from 2006 to 2008;
Crosstown Blvd / Nightingale St Intersection.
All departments continue to have a hand in producing the draft CIP, and as part of the annual
budget review process, the Finance Department is updating the detailed cash flow analysis for
funding the improvements.
Attachments
-'
CITY OF
NDOVE
2006 - 2010 Capital Improvement Flan
'. )
1685 Crosstown 51vd NW, Andover, MN 55704-
rhone: 767-755.5100 Fax: 767-755.8927
www.ci.andover.mn.U5
~.
1
IMPROVEMENTS
,
I
- /
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
2006
thru
2010
Department
Project# Priority 2006
2007
2008
2009
2010 Total
Engineering
PedestJian Tfal1 Maintenance
06-42001Hll
47,000
48,000
49,000
50,000
51,000
245,000
Engineering Total
47,000
48,000
49,000
SO,OOO
51,000
245,000
Facility Management
Carpet Replacement 06-4194O-1l1 2 10,000 10,000 10,000 30,000
/ City Hal Garage Expansion 06-4194G-02 1 20,000 20,000
Bunding A. Seal ROOf 06-41961Hll 1 6,000 7,000 8,000 21,000
Cold Storage BId-Waterproof Wans 06-41960-02 -1 8,000 8,000
Mezzanine Area. Building A 06-41961Hl3 2 20,000 20,000
Pub,c Wrn1<s Development Planning 06-41960-04 1 10,000 10,000
Rre SlI/2 Addition and Par1<ing Lot Improve. 07 -41951Hll 2 450,000 450,000
Surface Seal an Brick Struc1JJres 06-4194O-1l1 1 35,000 35,000
Land Purchase 06-41960-01 515,217 515,217
Facility Management Total 74,000 480,000 567,217 8,000 1,109,217
, Park & Rec - Operations
J
Replace'Repair Play Struc1JJres. Various Pal1<s
06-45200-04
2
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
200,000
2
Department
Project# Priority 2006
2007
2008
2009
2010 Total
Park & Rec - Operations Total
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
200,000
Park & Rec - Projects
Woodland Estates 4th Park 06-45201-01 15,000 15,000
Fox Meadows Park 06-45201-02 10,000 10,000
Prairie Knoll Par1< - Phase II 06-45201-03 35,000 150,000 185,000
AthleticlPark Complex South of the WOE 06-45201-05 642.386 760,080 1,402,466
Annual Miscellaneous Projects 06-45201-99 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
Terrace Pari< 07-45201-01 55,000 55,000
Crooked Lake Baal Landing 07-45201-02 125,000 125,000
Strootman Par1< 08-45201-01 100,000 100,000
Forest Meadows Par1< 08-45201-02 25,000 25,000
Andover Uons Pari< 09-45201-01 85,000 85,000
Hawluidge Pari< Improvements 1ll-45201-O1 500,000 500,000
Park & Rec - Projects Total 727,38& 965,080 150,000 260,000 525,000 2,&27,46&
Sanitary Sewer
Crosstown Blvd Trunk Sewer Une
Yellow Pine Lift Station
600,000
353,650
600,000
06-49450-01
08-49450-01
353.650
Sanitary Sewer Total
353,650
600,000
953,&50
Streets I Highways
Annual Street Seal Coal Project 06-43100-01 .1 263,615 203,084 550,569 471,092 313,212 1,801,572
/ Annual street Crack Seal Project 06-43100-02 96,008 204,786 175,225 116,500 117,556 710,075
Annual Street Mm and Overlay 06-43100-03 736,454 1,027,052 967,705 835,228 740,138 4,306,Sn
3
Department Project# Priority 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Annual Pavement Markings 05-43100-04 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 80,000
Municipal State Aid Routes I New & Reconstrud 05-43100-05 1,529,400 0 859,150 2,608,000 4,996,550
Signal Upgrade. Bunker Lake BivdlRound Lake Blvd 05-43100-06 20,000 20,000
Intersection Upgrades 06-4310Q.j)7 600,000 400,000 1,000,000
Construd Bikewayl Walkway Corridors 06- TRAIL-1)l 60,000 60,000 100,000 230,000 75,000 525,000
_ Streets I Highways Total 3,319,477 1,509,922 3,068,649 4,277,820 1,263,906 13,439,774
Water
Rehabilitation of Wens 06-4940Q.j)2 40,000 45,000 45,000 130,000
Water System Security Improvements 06-494OO-ll3 15,000 15,000
Water Tower Painting 07-49400-01 350,000 350,000
143rd Ave Water Main Improvements 07-49400-02 83,000 83,000
Construd Water Tower 06-49400-01 2,950,000 2,950,000
Water Main along South Coon Creek Drive 09-49400-01 500,000 500,000
Demonsh 500,000 Ganon Water Tower 09-49400-02 175,000 175,000
Chapman's Addilion Water Main Improvements 09-49400-03 325,000 325,000
Smith's Green Acres Water Main Improvements 09-49400-04 572,000 572,000
Water Total 55,000 478,000 2,995,000 1,572,000 5,100,000
/
4
~
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 20 years
Category Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Engineering
Project #
06-42000-01
Project Name Pedestrian Trail Maintenance
Description
This project provides maintenance such as patching, crack fIlling and restoration for the city's pedestrian and park trail system.
Justification
City trails are in need of general maintenance including bituminous patching, crack fIlling and restorntion to maintain the high level of service to pedestrian walkers.
bikers and roller bladers_ A 5-year capital improvement plan was prepared for the City to identifY and prioritize the necessary repairs.
Expenditures
Improvement
2006
47,000
47,000
2007
48,000
48,000
2008
49,000
49,000
2009
50,000
50,000
2010
51,000
51,000
Total
245,000
245,000
,
Total
Funding Sources
R & B - Pedestrian Trail
2006
47,000
47,000
2007
48,000
48,000
2008
49,000
49,000
2009
50,000
50,000
2010
51,000
51,000
Total
245,000
245,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
As the city trail system begins to age, general maintenance such as bituminous patching. crack filling and restoration becomes a necessity. The maintenance will
allow for a longer service life for the trail system throughout the city.
5
"
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Facility Management
Project # 06-41940-01
Project Name Carpet Replacement
Description
This item calls for the replacement of carpet in appropriate areas of all City buildings where deemed necessary. An annual review of all carpeted areas will be done
to determine the order of replacement Because of the very heavy use by firefighters and some public events, the carpet at fire station # I should be replaced with a
much more durable surface such as tile or something equivalent
Justification
The buildings get a lot of use and, despite the appropriate cleaning and maintenance, the carpeted area will need to be replaced. The intent ofthe replacement is to
get the carpet out of the fIre stations where it maybe should not have been installed in the fIrst place. We could clean the existing and 'get by" for a few years but the
fire department believes that replacing the carpet with a different type of material's) will be much more cost efficient to do. The carpet should not be in heavy traffic
areas where training and other fire activities is taking place.
Expenditures 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Facility Maintenance 10,000 10,000 10,000 30,000
Total 10,000 10,000 10,000 30,000
/
Funding Sources 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total'
Capital Projects Levy 10,000 10,000
General Fund 10,000 10,000 20,000
Total 10,000 10,000 10,000 30,000
Operational Impact/Other I
The carpet replacement will be needed in order to keep the buildings in good repair. Due to heavy use, it is anticipated that all carpeted area will need to be replaced.
6
'\
Capital Plan
/ City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Years
Category Facility Management
Priority 1 - High
Coutact PW Superintendent
Department Facility Management
Project # 06-41940-02
Project Name City Hall Garage Expansion
Description
Add two stalls to the garage at city hall so all city vehicles can be parked inside to protect them from vandalism and weather conditions. This would include
changing the electric heating units to overhead gas units.
Justification
Security and protection for all vehicles from vandalism and weather conditions.
Expenditures
Improvement
2006
20,000
20,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
20,000
20,000
'\
Total
/
Funding Sources
Capital Projeds Levy
2006
20,000
20,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
20,000
20,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Overall savings in the life of equipment.
'\
/
7
Capital Plan
I City of Andover, MN
Project # 06-41960-01
Project Name Building A - Seal Floo~
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 2 Years
Category Facility Management
Priority I - Hi~h
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Facility Management
Description
Use a sealant nn cement floor in Building A Oarge garage).
Justification
I
The cement floor in building a will spaid due to salt and traffic from daily vehicles use_This sealing of the floors should be repeated every 2 years to retain the
integrity of the floor swface. Without this process, the cement floor would deteriorate and would have to be replaced. It is much more cost effective to perform the
maintenance than to replace the entire floor.
Expenditures 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Facility Mainlenanca 6,000 7,000 8,000 21,000
Total 6,000 7,000 8,000 21,000
I
Funding Sources 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Capital Projects Levy 6,000 6,000
General Fund 7,000 8,000 15,000
Total 6,000 7,000 8,000 21,000
Operational Impact/Other I
Gives use a much longer life of the cement floor, than having to replace it before its life expectancy is up.
/
8
/
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
,
Project #
06-41960-02
Project Name Cold Storage Bid-Waterproof Walls
Type Improvement
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Facility Management
Description
Waterproof walls in the Cold Storage building by installing fiberglass panels four feet up the wall from the floor and include necessary trim and caulking.
Justification
The existing walls are deteriorating due to age. water usage and equipment stored in the building. The fiberglass panels will eliminate water absorption in the walls.
If the panels are not installed, water will seep through to the structural columns that support the building.
Expenditures
Improvement
2006
8,000
8,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
8,000
8,000
Total
/
Funding Sources
Capital Projeds Levy
2006
8,000
8,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
8,000
s.oOO
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Less maintenance and repairs will be required.
/
9
i
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Usdul Life 15-20 Years
Category Improvements
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Facility Management
Project #
06-41960-03
Project Name Mezzanine Area - Building A
Description
To build a 780 square foot mezzanine area on the west side of building A . This would be the exact square footage of the one that was built on the east side two
years ago.
Justification
Having a mezzanine works great for storage; items are up out of the way and do not get damaged. Similar to the east mezzanine, this mezzanine will be assembled
by city stafT. Utilizing wasted space is a large cost savings to the city.
Expenditures
Improvement
2006
20,000
211,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
20,000
211,000
Total
Funding Sources
Capital Projects Levy
2006
20,000
211,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
20,000
20,000
Total
OperationallmpactJOther I
As the city grows, there becomes more and more supplies that we have to be keep in stock. We have overhead space available in building A for another mezzanine
like the one we built two years ago. It is a very cost effective and efficient way to utilize overhead storage space that we wouldn't nonnally use.
/
10
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 06-41960-04
Project Name Public Works Development Planning
.
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Usefnl Life 5-10 yoan;
Category Facility Management
Priority 1 - High
Contact PW Snperintendent
Department Facility Management
Description l
Provide a master plan for Public Works expansion.
Justification l
The master plan would allow for the ultimate buildout of the Public Worts Facility, including buildings and yard space.
Expenditures
Planning/Design
2006
10,000
10,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
10,000
10,000
.,
Total
/
Funding Sources
Capital Projeds Levy
2006
10,000
10,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
10,000
10,000
Total
I OpomlWMI Im_
11
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-41950-01
Project Name Fire St. #2 Addition and Parking Lot Improve.
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 30 Y"""
Category Improvements
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact Fire Chief
Department Facility Management
Description
The addition of one bay to the apparatus area, the purchase and storage of an auxiliary power generator. and expanding the existing parking lot to allow for more
room and parking space. The project also includes a mill and overlay of the existing parking lots at Station #1 and #2.
Justification
The additional space to the building will allow for all vehicles to be parked in front of an exit door. The firefighters will not have to move a vehicle in order to get
another one out of the building. The additional bay will also make clean up operations after an event much easier. The firefighters will not have to move vehicles
out of the building in order to clean hose and equipment The auxiliary power generator would allow all functions of the building to work during a power outage~
including pumping water from the well and opening the doors. The additional parking space will provide for much needed hard surface training area and more
vehicle parking. Replacement of the existing parking lots is necessary due to the heavy fire vehicle traffic.
Expenditures 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Equipment 35,000 35,000
Improvement 415,000 415,000
, 450,000
I Total 450,000
Funding Sources
G.O. Bond
2006
2007
450,000
450,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
450,000
450,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The additional space will make all fire operations more efficient at this building. Vehicles will not have to be moved in order to get others out and clean-up will be
much easier and faster. The power supply win allow for normal operations at the station at aU times and would also allow the building to be used as an emergency
operations center if needed.
/
12
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 5 years
Category Facility Management
Priority t - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Facility Management
Project #
08-41940-01
Project Namc Surface Seal all Brick Structures
Description
A surface sealing application would be initiated for all brick and/or block municipal buildings. The buildings include: City Hall, Public Works, Fire Station #1 &
#2, Sunshine Park Building, and all utility department buildings such as lhe pump houses and treatment facility.
Justification
This is a necessary maintenance item to ensure the long term integrity of the municipal buildings.
Expenditures
Fadlity Maintenance
2006
2007
2008
35,000
35,000
2009
2010
Total
35,000
35,000
Total
I
Funding Sources
CapITal Projeds Levy
SanITary Sewer Fund
Water Fund
2006
2007
2008
24,000
3,500
7,500
35,000
2009
2010
Total
24,000
3,500
7,500
35,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
This will reduce the amount of long term maintenance and repair to the municipal buildings.
/
13
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life Unassigned
Category Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Facility Management
Project #
08-41960-01
Project Name Land Purchase
Description
Purchase land west of the Public Works building to be used for a salt storage building, material storage, recycling center and future facility expansion. This could be
the City's last chance to purchase this land. The City management team will be evaluating and assisting with the planning and future expansion for the Public
Works Facility. Adequate property is necessary to insure that future needs of-the community can be met.
Justification
I
This is the last opportunity to purchase this property and keep city facilities together in one complex. Future site expansion opportunities are limited without
additional property.
Expenditures
Land Acquisition
2006
2007
2008
515,217
515,217
2009
2010
Total
515,217
515,217
Total
)
Funding Sources
Building Fund
2006
2007
2008
515,217
515,217
2009
2010
Total
515,217
515,217
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Large cost savings in keeping facilities together. Another large savings is having a salt storage area on the property. The recycling center would be moved away
from the parks and this would help maintain cleaner parks on the complex. It would also provide a large storage area for the seal coat rock, sweeping, etc. Open
land areas in Andover will soon be a thing of the past.
14
~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: LAND PURCHASE
-c
~==
I
I
k~~ I
'. """ ..J ~
e' C(\~ - }-
tl
-
-
I
I
.~
--r;
f-f-
-
- \d
.- 'lf~
s
:s-
T
,~
CITY HALL AND
PUBLIC WORKS
PROPERTY
I "-
~~
.
,-.v:-
-
:"':,:.-:-
_J_ ,.;, ,.<:
"
.'
/
I
~
~:>::.?:
::;-
\
\
--
::z:
;.-
:-/.
'---
ROW
..'
s
Location Map
,.?'~~n~ ~ -1(,~
Ii ~ "Vfif ~ ~ ~ ;'
I~!n .::r'R~ f r-
'ltJili .d,.,i::-~' ,
--".!J:o +:
"7i~L ".
~I ~ d\JJ
=r. PI
~
..!I
I--.T
LEGEND
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
N City Limits
I:zzZ::J Project Location
250 125 0 250
Feet
. "
, /
15
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Project # 06-45200-04
Project Name ReplacelRepair Play Structures - Various Parks
Type Improvement
Useful Life !O Years
Category Park Improvements
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Park & Roc - Operations
Description l
Repair to fall zones and achieve ADA accessibility. Replacement of playground equipment and other major replacements, such as short fences on ball fields, soccer
goals, or any area of play that does not meet safety specifications.
Justification 1
Old equipment no longer meets ADA requirements, such as enlnlpments, fall zones or handicap accessibility. Working to bring the parks up to meet all safety
requirements.
Expenditures 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Equipment 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000
Total 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000
/
Funding Sources 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Capital Projects Levy 40,000 40,000
General Fund 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 160,000
Total 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000
Operational Impact/Other
I
Less maintenance and will meet all safety requirements.
)
16
\
J
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Project# 06-45201-01
Project Name Woodland Estates 4th Park
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
Description I
At this point, the type of improvements to the park have not been identified. The Woodland Estates neighbomood is still exploring options for the park, although is
appears they are leaning towards new playground equipment
Justification
I
Currently. the park has no activities available to the residents. With the park being the only one in the area west of Nightingale Stree~ this project has been
recommended by the Parle & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures
Construction
2006
15,000
15,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
15,000
15,000
Total
Funding Sources
Pari< Improvement Funds
2006
15,000
15,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
15,000
15,000
Total
I ~""" l"""""'~
/
17
,I ~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: WOODLAND ESTATES PARK
-- !~
~ I~
12 iZ;
roo -l'i~~1r <( . ---=.'
L....I J:",\ I~-,Ji~ lbJ~ 9:; 1,,'.u::ln I '" " -
EMUK~---7 ~ 1 (
I ".
~ ~i" I
I I
! I
-
\ I H..? ll\l~ u ~-.,)R:
" ,
,
~
\ \%~;-
--I,
1:i~
o
~
i
l
tt~
~,\ h\ Crl.
Z,
illl
~i
0::'
/
~
fJ
Wn
I ./'U\ - -. 1l:\ofCT 'fil-:-
~ ~ - I ~ ~~ -
/ I d:~ lt~, \ t
/ rx# '-;
I, I I ~
Jl:\1,CT~/C / Q 1. 7r=- ~
r I ~ I r 1
- --
/R /-
~ ~ Lf;:lt;
Feet
Location Map
_~~n f.t:t: -lffJ L
~ ". ~'h3' ==-:..,-,~ ! '--- G
7- ~
'n '''' ;z I
'- = '>-"~
~1fT '
"1'" iF- ~~\~
~~~~L ~,.: 'k'
""\!~~~,
""JL ~~ '
~:Wi ~
LEGEND
ROW
N
W*E
S
,0 Lots I Parcels
,0 \/Vater Features
N City Limits
==:J Project Location
'"
155 0
'"
18
Capital Plan
"
/ City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 20 years
Category Equipment
Priority I - Higb
Contact City Engineer
Departmeut Park & Rec - Projects
Project #
06-45201-02
Project Name Fox Meadows Park
Description I
Construct new basketball court
Justification I
Since the park is classified as a neighborhood, additional recreation opportunities should be considered. Current amenities include playground equipment, one
soccer field and a new frisbee golf COUISe.
This project bas been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
10,000
10,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
10,000
10,000
Total
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Funds
2006
10,000
10,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
10,000
10,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Additionallong-tenn maintenance and ultimately replacement will be necessary.
/
19
9\Nrl.bVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: FOX MEADOWS PARK
City of Andover, Minnesota
Incorportated 1974
=j
'i:
tJ
l
Ii' I I ~
if : I II"
17 A
II ;m:FPF
.~
\ I
N
, I
\, I
~!
/~:} ~ I~~
f-
f-
f-
(
-'.,-
-
-
='Y-~ ~
I~
IJ ~ ~
C D ':::j
"I~~ AiT ~ 1~~
'1/ ~'--~/
I ~l
~ ~0
I=R\" ~
---h
'J
\ ~ J,
I
, )
------'
I
)
"\'
'I
,-
~I! \
~
ROW
N
W+E
S
Location Map
,d~~Jfm ~ j fl(-C=
I~~"-fif::;:;: ,4
I ~ In 1 ~ R ~ lL f ~
'11., ffi L:'''':; =--"
~ W,); ~~ ~j-i-:
Il it =: g;; ;t"-' k-
~~ )L ~~~
~ f~~~~~~
LEGEND
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
/v City Limits
o Project Location
500 0 500 Feet
out "
\
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 06-45201-03
Project Name Prairie Knoll Park - Phase II
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Years
Category Park Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
Description
2006 _ New playground equipment ($25,000) necessary for ages 2 - 5 years old would be installed and the purchase of three bleachers ($10,000) for the surrounding
soccer/football fields. 2009 - The parking lot would be paved including concrete curb and gutter ($150,000).
Justification
Prairie Knoll Park is considered a regional city park and completion would bring it into compliance with City standards due to the increased use by the associations
for both soccer and football.
This project has beeo recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures
Improvement
2006
35,000
35,000
2008
2009
150,000
150,000
2007
Total
2010
Total
185,000
185,000
Funding Sources
Par1< Improvement Funds
2006
35,000
35,000
2008
2009
150,000
150,000
2007
Total
2010
Total
185,000
185,000
Operational Impact/Other I
Additional long-term maintenance and ultimately replacement will be necessary.
21
NDb'lE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: PRAIRIE KNOLL PARK
City of Andover, Minnesota
Incorportated 1974
I~^
~~I:/
v::'- V
1%3)5l1H~4t7",-~
I r
n
I~
~
/c1
I~
I~
Ii'"
~~'" II
rr~ n
1--
I
"
I~
1-1111/ --r
I~
_-1'
Fffif
fih"-l if m
-:
LEGEND
ROW
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
/y CjtyLim~s
o Project Location
rout N .
~j
~
~
i'
I'-
1'\
,
\~
~{;.
":'$t;~W"i
~ ,\
I !'
C
--
~~ '"''
I
./
>-
~~
~
f-
f-
f-
>---
I-
f-
-
r--
I-
~ I ~;
~ Ii
L >:X>>+.:. ,: -
~~~~
Co
~ ~~ ~~'"
-~ / "#I~~
~>--~
10'= ~ ~\1 t: J5)C Ii l
IS
l..,.
f<=
N
W*E
S
Location Map
p ~ ~J;f m -ru;r: ~ -K L,--
I~~~--"R! ~ ~ ~ G
IL '\E;[Y' tJ
'" ~ A '- ~ "- r-,
I" u;: ~ ~J r-f:-
\ i}~lJ;' '-'~
~ i_A~ ~~)1
~~ ~l~
500 0 SOD Feet
,
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 06-45201-05
Project Name Athletic/Park Complex South ofthe WDE
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 30 y""", +
Category Park Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
Description
Development and construction of an AthleticlPark Complex south of the WDE site. This complex will consist of three new fully furnished baseball fields.
playground equipment, bituminous trails throughout the complex and a building to store equipment, to hold meetings and a concession area for the summer months.
3 Ball Fields _ $225,000; Building - $250,000; Trail System - $75,000; Ballfield Lighting - $300,000; Playground Equipment - $] 00,000; Paved parlcing lot wi
concrete & gutter - $150,000; Irrigation - $100,000; Fencing - $125,000; Misc. items - $77,466.
Note: Parkin would be shared with the businesses.
Justification
Due to the lack of baseball fields with grass infields in the City, this site will be an ideal location for a baseball complex. There is. 200 foot buffer area just south
of the WDE that can not be built on with any type of structure but this area is ideal for the outfield of the ball fields. By placing the outfield of each field in this area
it facilitates this area to its fullest capacity.
This project has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures
Improvement
2006
642,386
642,386
2007
760,080
760,080
2008
2009
2010
Total
1,402,466
1,402,466
/
Total
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Funds
2006
642,386
642,386
2007
760,080
760,080
2008
2009
2010
Total
1,402,466
1,402,466
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Routine mainteriance will be required to upkeep the field and park.
23
Niib'TE'~
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Andover, Minnesota
Incorportated 1974
Project Name: ATHLETIC PARK/COMPLEX
SOUTH OF THE WOE
/
'\
. /
I 1"-
TTT f ~
~
'\
-..(
"'"
~ ?7
~ -"I ~
~_ 1"" ~ 't'" """ '\ 1---
,\'1; -
i,:~ J; . =-- l---'
W T\
~ ~
\ J9 -
'- -
\- /) ~~O":::3.3 a . iN'>> ~~
'~"';',7', """,,'y',"','---
I"" -
r --I --
~ //1// (1/ / I iff ~
" I
g~~ ~ -
/ ,~
, 16
D
;;. . .
~DD
o DO 0
"" . D1ik
L I/!/ \. ~
l-
---\ - .7 I
I I - I
, I I I I I PiT - "I
LEGEND Location Map
ROW N ,.f~~J'r~~ -~~
0 Lots I Parcels W+E f~ '''"g 3 ~
In [. ~~- ~)
0 Water Features s ~~I~~'
'II JS ll;:;:,;
/~! City Limits PL &; ~-i-;
0 Project Location SOD 0 SOD Feet G k vi ~ ~ rtJI
.......~ ..li
,,\
tout ~ .
\
)
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 06-45201-99
Project Name Annual Miscellaneous Projects
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life Unassigned
Category Park Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
Description I
This is for unforeseen or requested miscellaneous projects that may arise during the year. requested by the, public, st:.aff. City COWlcil or the Parks and Recreation
Commission for each year.
Justification I
This gives flexibility to the City to do certain small-sized projects that may be warranted; for example, purchase of soccer goals.
This funding has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Improvement 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
, Total 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
/
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Funds
2006
25,000
25,000
2007
25,000
25,000
2008
25,000
25,000
2009
25,000
25,000
2010
25,000
25,000
Total
125,000
125,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Allows the Park and Recreation Commission to address a variety of different needs throughout the year.
\
/
25
"
/
:apital Plan
Shy of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Years
Category Park Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
Project #
f
07-45201-01
Project Name Terrace Park
Description
Install new basketball court and parking lot with concrete curb and gutter along with completing a small section of trail to provide access to the playground
equipment and the other portions of the park.
Parking lot - $45,000; basketball court - $7,500; trail extension - $2,500.
Justification
The existing parking Jot is currently gravel. Since this is located in an urban ar~ the parking lot should be paved and the neighborhood residents have requested a
basketball court. Also, the trail to the playground area needs to be paved_
This project has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures
Construction
2006
2007
55,000
55,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
55,000
55,000
Total
I
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Funds
2006
2007
55,000
55,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
55,000
55,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Additional long-term maintenance and ultimately replacement will be necessary.
/
26
~~~bVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: TERRACE PARK
City of Andover, Minnesota
Incorportated 1974
~
~
LLl m IT]
i,
-'-'--
I T
I
\
;!.
~
[~~ ~
:t'
~
I-
:~] J
'~ "i;';1''( iI",
..",.
/
~ r
/
I
~~ ~ ~ I
.or- -5
Ll -
"\ '----
J /
J.--- 'f '(
) ---- ! [ / .~
, /0~/ F\e---y\ (
- :
~ -
z
IV City Limits
o Project Location
500
o
SOO Feel
Location Map
r"'~~b ~ ~ -1(, ~
t'~" <t; c:;:;: F f-, /-
~jn I ( F." \.L> - ~ r-
~,i1i },I:;~ (
I 'liS ~~ ~jl 'J' _
G~~
LEGEND
ROW
N
W*E
o Lots ( Parcels
o Water Features
s
'O~ .
/
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Years
Category Park Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
Project #
07-45201-02
Project Name Crooked Lake Boat Landing
Description I
Construct new parking lot, install new dock and dredge boat landing area.
Justification I
The existing parking lot is beyond its normal maintenance requirements. Surface has deteriorated and a number of pot holes have been filled up to this point A
boat dock is necessary for individuals launching their boat. Also, the boat landing has silted in and needs to be removed to allow boats to maneuver.
This project has been recommended by the Park & Recreatinn Commission.
Expenditures
Construction
2006
2007
125,000
125,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
125,000
125,000
Total
/
Funding Sources
DNR Grant
Park Improvement Funds
2006
2007
20,000
105,000
125,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
20,000
105,000
125,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
p"ormal maintenance (sealeoaling, striping, etc.) will be necessary.
,
/
28
<f\~l)bVE'~
City of Andover, Minnesota
Incorportated 1974
I I I "-
JJDJDJ
t=:3 ~:J:'~:'tj,
,)g::lJ::~:::JP=U;
:';i_ fR~'T/:J/";S:.}:/' "J:r:~
;,
\/
h
\;::"'6
-'
/
)LQ
-;
;-;,
'v
~
f---
h~--(
~ --;- /~
I~n~
/
LEGEND
ROW
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
IV City Limits
o Project Location
^Out
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: CROOKED LAKE BOAT LANDING
'A
<i::,c,
~
,~
--
~
(f "
500
/
---"
N
W,,-E
S
I'
~
l
1-
\ -
'----
-
I
1'l I
'/ 1 ~
~} I
~ <<,,/1 \
( j/'
~\J,
\
/ rj:j'T
/
I
\ ili
\
o
500 Fee
,
Location Map
~~~r~~ -~~
~ ~,' "'1 'f ~ ~ ~
l:n ,7R:::':~- ~~j
~ >-' ~==- ' Ir-
~, ir t'P- \'llb{,' -:r'
"'1 r<~~ ~,'-S';:lh-('-
~ ~ ~ ~'~,JI
1~!:lJX j"
~'El ~ i!li~
~~ ~,
Description I
Reconstruct existing ballfield, replace fencing. and pave existing parking lot
Reconstruct existing ballfield with fencing $60,000
construct new parking lot for ball field $40,000
Justification I
Ballfield fencing(fencing needs to be replaced) does not meet League ofMN Cities guidelines. Also, the parking lot needs to be paved with concrete curb and gutter
along with storm sewer.
This project has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
,
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Project # 08-45201-01
Project Name Strootman Park
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Years
Category Park Improvements
Priority I - High
Coutact City Engineer
Departmeut Park & Rec - Projects
Expenditures
Construction
2006
2007
2008
100,000
100,000
Total
2009
2010
Total
100,000
100,000
Funding Sources
Pari< Improvement Funds
2006
2007
2008
100,000
100,000
Total
2009
2010
Total
100,000
100,OOD
Operational Impact/Other I
Additionallong-tenn maintenance and ultimately replacement will be necessary.
-,
/
30
I!
9\NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: STROOTMAN PARK
City of Andover, Minnesota
Incorportated 1974
iY II I T ~ q l I~
. \;?\ i
~
. ,
UM RIVER --------'
: . <(
:c
\ I I
(/-:l 1 1 ~
~' - l.-
I ~ \- --lP
) ~
. \~L / . r~ y
-~
-----
, '\ I \ ~~
/ :~\ I ----
.' ~, ~
.
9 1r
\ -
\
-
0... . ~
(<) .' .
rfji]f
J!::;,\ I r~
LEGEND Location Map
ROW N ,d~~n~~ -rc,~
o Lots I Parcels W+E f~ "'fiB ~ ~
In , R.l \L> b ')
o Water Features s ~,*J .<:1'-I:;:~ r
,~] t~ ~y.
;",1 City Limits
o Project Location 500 0 500 Feet ~cti-IT
, ,
~ ~ \~
/
'out .
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-45201-02
Project Name Forest Meadows Park
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 20 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
Description
Install additional playground equipment for 2-5 year old users.
Justification
This project has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures
Construction
2006
2007
2008
25,000
25,000
2009
2010
Total
25,000
25,000
Total
/
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Funds
2006
2007
2008
25,000
25,000
2009
2010
Total
25,000
25,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Mditionallong-term maintenance and ultimately replacement will be necessaI)'.
32
I
I
J ~NDbVE~
,
-'
LEGEND
ROW
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
N City Limits
c=:=J Pr~ectLocation
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: FOREST MEADOWS PARK
...
s
700
350
7110
F."
33
Location Map
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 09-45201-01
Project Name Andover Lions Park
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Years
Categury Park Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department PaIl: & Rec - Projects
Description l
Install outfield fencing with mow strips for ballfield and install new irrigation system.
8 foot high fencing with mow strips - $35,000 and irrigate existing ballfield - $50,000.
Justification I
The installation of an outfield fence win allow the ball to stay in play and also give the awesome feeling when a ball is hit for a home nlll. Also give the players a
safer playing surface by installing a irrigation system.
This project has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
.
Expenditures
Construction
2006
2007
2008
2009
85,000
85,000
2010
Total
85,000
85,000
Total
)
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Funds
2006
2007
2008
2009
85,000
85,000
2010
Total
85,000
85,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other -1
Additionallong-tenn maintenance and ultimately replacement will be necessary.
34
ND.b'TE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANDOVER LIONS PARK
City of Andover, Minnesota
Incorportated 1974
.
~ Ilt 11 ~-
~ 'I17'r: ~ -
',f,JN ~
/ - ~.' -~
~J1J!1frn '" ~ ,~~
~~Ir w'~~
1~1~1
It" ~~
;::;\1m 'I I \~,y I I
1~"\iO 50 ~ 1/ rn \ .--- V
H='=\ ~ '\ - )::::::-
,....- ~ -----tU ~ -
\1=,-W // ~......-
-1'11 "L "lel 7~ - I'
-,J., I I ~ ~ I r/-- ~t:::J-
, l::: ~-
, ", 'Ii! 'f r- - ~--
~-r- -if vlf~L- ~~V/i ~ ~ ~
IH ~E./ '1;:: ~ TIll
I \ .:::: /r}--- - \
ii/iN! 0
~
~
~
~
~
~
\~
~
j'- ',Y
I~
II~
/"'\
- --0:::
I :I
lL
I
-
,
IT
I II
j
/1
\ I I
'-
I
I
n~
~-1<I~~
~ H ~~\
Y! ~ \ \ ~\ \ \ \
"
BUNKEl((
LAI{
---
~
ROW
N
W*E'
S
Location Map
,rd'N. ~)fn ~~ -J~U
rc~" ~ t;::;: ~ r
l:n '~L_, ~
'1' .-<)., ~ ~ r
II-> i1i II JS L ~~
~ %~t i~i ~-i;
G~~, o;UI
~_~ ~ ~ i
11.~~
-m,l'fi }-...\
LEGEND
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
I 'yl City Limits
o Project Location
SOD 0 500 Feet
, '
out
Capital Plan
) City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
\
Type Improvement
Useful Life 30 Years
Category Park Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Park & Rec - Projects
Project #
10-45201-01
Project Name Hawkridge Park Improvements
Description
The project includes the construction of a warming house, construction of a well w/pump and controls, installation of irrigation for the soccer and ball fields,
playground equipment for children 2-5 years of age and bleachers for sporting spectators.
Storage buildinglbathrooms/concessions - $209,000; drill well with pump & controls - $100,000; septic system - $7,500; pave existing parlcing lot - $90,000;
irrigation for 2 fields - $50,000; playground Equipment (2-5 year olds) - $25,000; bleachers with concrete pads(soccer & ballfield) - $15,000; security light-
$2,500; ark si a e and landsca in - $1,000_
Justification 1
By continuing to improve the park system in Andover. the City provides a high quality parks and recreation complex to meet the growing needs of an active
community. These improvements will provide high quality athletic and recreational opportunities to the residents. A warming house provides shelter and a
restroom facility that can be used year around. The well and irrigation provide for a high quality athletic surface for soccer, baseball/softball activities and water for
the restroom. Playground equipment provides activities for younger children and bleachers provide a safe and comfortable place for spectators.
This project has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Commission.
Expenditures
Construction
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
500,000
500,000
Total
500,000
500,000
Total
)
Funding Sources
Pari< Improvement Funds
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
500,000
500,000
Total
500,000
500,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other
The construction ofa warming house and restroom facility will increase the use and enjoyment of the park. Also, the construction of the storage/warming
house/restroom facility will eliminate the need to rent a portable warming house and portable bathroom. The well construction will give the ability to ice the rinks
from the on-site well and will eliminate the need to "tanker- water to the site from the Public Works facility on Crosstown Blvd. The playground equipment will
nire additional Jong-tenn maintenance and ultimate Iacement will be necess
36
~~tfj.b'lE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: HAWKRIDGE PARK
City of Andover, Minnesota
I ncorportated 1974
~''''''n ..L.... ...L.. .LL:
~
" ()
~ --
~
~ l \
Jf;
,
-
0 1:1'
g y!
<
~~\ ~ 1r
}Ii;. e--
i\
\ I I / >;
-
LEGEND Location Map
ROW N ~~~jFn~~ -J~~
o Lots I Parcels W*E ~ "-"f t:;:;:; ~ t.L
'n '~p~ I-
o Water Features s 1f' ,
~ Illr JE~ W~,t.:
/V City Limits
-~ Z 'k'
G Project Location 500 0 500 Feet Iir }- ~~
,
~ ~~
1--.\
,
/
'aut
Capital Plan
i City of Andover, MN
Project # 06-49450-01
Project Name Crosstown Blvd Trunk Sewer Line
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 50 Years
Category Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Sanituy Sewer
Description
Extend sanituy sewer trunk along Crosstown Blvd from the railroad tracks east 10 Prairie Road.
Justification
The trunk sanituy sewer will be extended 10 serve properties aqjacenl to Crosstown Boulevard and east of Prairie Road. This extension has been recommended
through the sanituy sewer report (2004 Sanituy Sewer Report).
Expenditures
Improvement
2006
353,650
353,650
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
353,650
353,650
Total
/
Funding Sources
Sewer Trunk Fund
2006
353,650
353,650
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
353,650
353,650
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Additional routine maintenace will be required.
\
J
38
~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: CROSSTOWN BLVD SEWER LINE
-
. -
.. .
.
.
I
~.cl'
:' ,
I m~ ~..,,!, 4~ ~~~WiJ~1b"
[' I ~\(; >-=1 uI~ttJ~ ~ ~
I i~ ~8 ~~
;... i. . ~ I ;\ ::;,"""'"
~ q' ~~~ ~~'ei
':,&1"" \~~::"t~O 'of>~~
~.~':'.'. .I'~.J..~. ''>.l~jl7l\ 31 \.'); =[
I J!"'. P0 ' r- \--L:::(ld ~. f-- ~~
i)] -r",;P~_. ,Ih:,-I >p' -l!-
1&. ,rl""'"" ~r--. g,-- 0; I I J)C' !--
;0. lhv ~~ "';- \. ;;j
:'!. ,~ · __~~ ~ I~ .~Y!P' ~~P~AI~IEli
l . Y r (Z-/ ~ O,AKS I:....'.
,i; < > '^~" I'
i, ~:t' l I<-
ili!i.::l V r t € "~ 'I
iii:, L /U' ~A
!!)!!!l II I I; , ~/d? 1\
II N 4 ~), b A
Ii' ~ 'Yilt. r iF
Pli' ~/~ __"~ ll-I-5
,ill ~V' 1~~\~~ "~
,Ii II LEG~' N D " " ."", ...,......'.....
-
a
!--
I I'
Location Map
ROW
..'
s
F.~
~~u~K~
L~ '( ~:a-j-~' tl
k"",' A'\.i2~ ,
"LilT 1111 ~ ~~
.~~~ ~jiJ ~ 'k
~ 'l6\t mJJ
'"""t~~~ ~~
'~_~ h\
o Lots I Parcels
'0 Water Features
N City Limits
= Project Location
850
~25 0
850
~I
I
I
39
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 50 Years
Category Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Sanitary Sewer
Project #
08-49450-01
Project Name Yellow Pine Lift Station
Description
Install a lift station at Yellow Pine to divert flow from the Bluebird trunk line to the Pinewood trunk line. The wet well for this lift station was constructed in 2005
as a part of the Crosstown Boulevard Improvements Project
Justification
This lift station win allow additional capacity in the Bluebird trunk line to serve adjacent properties until the year 2020.
Expenditures
Improvement
2006
2007
2008
600,000
600.000
2009
2010
Total
600,000
600.000
Total
Funding Sources
Sewer Revenue Bonds
2006
2007
2008
600.000
600.000
2009
2010
Total
600,000
600.000
Total
Operational ImpactJOther I
Routine monitoring and maintenance of the lift station will be required.
/
40
'!~NiSbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: YELLOW PINE LIFT STATION
/1
LEGEND
Location Map
,8 Water Features
N City Limits
c:::::J Project Location
350 175
'"
ROW
..'
s
o Lots I Parcels
I
I
"
/
41
,
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
/
Type Improvement
Useful Life 7 Years
Categury Streets/Highways
Pr;ority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Streets I Highways
Project #
06-43100-01
ProjcctName Annual Street Seal Coat Project
Description
This project provides for a seal coat of the streets in the following maintenance zones:
2006 - Zone 3
2007 - Zone 4
2008 - Zone 5
2009 - Zone 6
2010 - Zone 7
New develo ments will also be seal coated as r uired
Justification
I
Seal coating will extend the useful life of roads by protecting the bituminous from oxidation due to adverse weather conditions (s~ rain, wind, snow. etc.). The
prevention of oxidation will prolong the useful life of the pavement and defer the need for a costly reconstruction. Seal coating also improves the skid resistance of
the roadway surface by increasing the friction between vehicle tires and the roadway.
New developments requiring seal coating are not shown on the attached maps.
Expenditures
Construction
2006
263,615
263,615
2007
203,084
203,084
2008
550,569
550,569
2009
471,092
471,092
2010
313,212
313,212
Total
1,801,572
1,801,572
Total
Funding Sources 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Construction Seal Coat Fund 29,726 6,807 96,220 78,330 4,791 215,874
R & B - Crack Seal & Seal Coa 233,889 196,277 454,349 392,762 308,421 1,585,698
Total 263,615 203,084 550,569 471,092 313,212 1,801,572
Operational Impact/Other I
Extending the life of the street will reduce routine maintenance (Crack sealing, pot hole patching. overlays, etc.) and extend the overall design life of the pavement.
'\
/
42
5'\NDbVE'~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT
2006 STREET SEAL COAT, ZONE 3
.
\
... 'I}
- ~
~~
/
"""
-" ~" . ~/,
f~-=-- .. ~ ~
]' l ~
~~
,~~./ ." )f{TTill
.~
\ I
~
"~
"V
-
~q
~.
U
r\.
~
h
~ ---:~?--" L I
I
'--,
J
~-
T
"
::--'fLL
~
=~
'Yt- ;
~--n I 1\
1 ~
~-
--I T
,~T '!l ,\1 ,
\11~ !
r[,.''' :
I ',Jl
....
LEGEND
..'
s
ROW
o Lots I Parcels
o IMlter Features
N City Limits
c:::=J Project Location
2...00 1200 D 2,400
,
/
43
:!i
~I H
,- ,
- -L
i -//
..::i
!II
ILl
ILL
:ffi. L -
>Wr
i7 I
q I I
.
- .
Jt:
t
~I-lr .......
tl
II
.....-
,~
...... j
.
-&,,!,.,L
I T'I
I I
'i=t
--
I
I
I
~-
L#
I--'
I
!-
+
-H-
od"'-
I
'"
I~
WJ
-
'-r
I ,
1 f-V
~
J, Location Map
d~~lfTI~ j --{, ~
~'-9U' --:-:::!' ")
I" ,7 R ~ f--- \ A
_ ) ,~;;,-', ,
", i'Ii I,! !'1iI 1'1' lltili ~
~~~~i!lf,;;;:'9''''{-
~ "'" Cl--W],
I , ~ -"
h\
.
.
~:u
..'"
...
II
NDbVE~
~ H;
q:-
~-
--
~
1
J 1--"'" ~H
~
iF'
r';;-
11II
II
.. 'I '
.L 'r'-'--1
,
-
<
~ ~
/\? t::J
w
-r- I- I
,........... iT rrl LL
:~~'
IH-/
...,:.. ... M '
l,lIf
................,
J
,
I I ~
illJ
LEGE N D
ROW
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
N City Limits
c:=J Project Location
I
"'"~
']-1-
1::'-
-
-
.>
-
TII
I I
_I:
'..,T...,..
',,,"
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT
2007 STREET SEAL COAT, ZONE 4
1
.. U u =~l= I i~
[J; r
r-i. "\ '- r
---! _ ~r-
';;Q ~ "'-r
1-'"' -1 L l
1
\. .'
<- i/V7' I. r(wA~bj
~ '0. ~1
IH -~
, U
:I~
;Lj,
~ I, :::J'
~I~
u
--L
---
--'-
-
'J:.
<)'r ,
~~
<,(".'...~-<....~
;;EI.!Mi
c::::
I
,~ ..J
?
-
I I
, I I
-
===1
.~
I
d:' ~
J~~;'
-, i'l:t ~
,
:?l
P'I
j'
I I
I
-
-
I)
hi
,
-
?
//
,-, H=
'---i
--i
4
1---
::i
~
)
I
i:
:---... "'WL
I ~X'L
..
Location Map
'.'
s
~ ~ ~-t[: -L'~~ ~ ~
r~~ ~~ r/
~n r I 0c- tV'-
~ ttI' ,~\ :.9:-
-, --Pi': '"
~ W ~~;~)]
'li~~'~~
III
,"00
',,,"
...
...
44
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT
2008 STREET SEAL COAT, ZONE 5
-, V I I I
li- t! ~ " -'e''',=- ~,
1:- t.: !' ~I
L I
.l,l-IJ e,- I' ~ Ih
f-J"...., I dr-n ,
i~i- I W f-- Tl ~\'>
I-- ,
,,, , i // \ 1\
~. ,~ ~,. ,~ -
I 7
I ""
I i I' I "
I _cJ I ~ IL
~I I I I
rill r"
I - e--.
,
I ."-.- L.J.J,.'
""
1- I
Ii II",
I ;
, ~ I).-Y
I ~kY=
I _2, ,
-. " _I
r~
l-< i- .;;;;"
trL~ l- i-
jo. , I I
.J I \ II
l-
-,.-.-\ -
~;,
,,~~-,
-~
'UNKEP~
'Lf:K~{_ \~I
!?
,
r li8
"',
'" LEGEND
I
Location Map
ROW
..'
s
~~ ~J;Fn .~ K ~
n-~'~~ ."'" r/
n I, _ ' ~. 1111- '1/'- '
), it. j lIil l.tt. l~\' q'
.""'.... ~. ~.):a:;r~' if 1"'<;
~~~~w=
~~~~
o Lots I Parcels
o INater Features
N City Limits
= Project Location
3,DOCI l.soo 0 3.000
45
I.
II
J
I
I
,
I" I
I Wi; WiB~IIII~ hTi~ I
" . ~ It. ::s: U LL --- [[J- )'-7/
,.,,"", it =:1mh-~~ ,r, l=
'j .1 ~/ ~.~
I
NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT
2009 STREET SEAL COAT, ZONE 6
I( h
L
.
.
-'
Ii
HI
In r] I
I I-L - r ~ \
1-1.. n I' I
- II fJh
I '~..6 1/
I "'t _1I U
II ~~t~
I ~ It )=1; ~
, ~ ~~:~9~'iJ I F1
lJ -' xr- TLr+1ii
'. / _L IUI
1,~~~1
~
I II
I"
-
"
! /C >J+=
I I , 1,\ I
, n R ,
~" ""-,
;
- ,
J ~
~:r h"- I
II L-Jr l . I I
~K I,
rF I
'>
I ,
,
,
,
-
LEGEND
~ 'J
. -'" ..'
'1 L J
) '--I ( n ,..,1c:D::i:1:1':J I
,.""",L""".,..
. .
,.
I
I
I
. '.'
ROW
. ')~IEID,U L,.,"'n-<_
'," ' \,
..'
s
1~11 II
Location Map
CD INater Features
N City Limits
= Project Location
2.250 1.125 0 2.250
"00
--
d~~J!n~'.;~~
~ ~'~"'rac --;-;:l'~ r }
~ In ,~tLP-:; fir-
"t., ~;; IlJ ltT ~fu'\l rc
~ H- '. --H'CJ't <;-
~,~ A~" [\.,JJ
., ~ .ll
_tl; - ~ \
CD Lots I Parcels
-'
46
" ~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
I
I
I
/ ,I
/1
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET SEAL COAT PROJECT
2010 STREET SEAL COAT, lONE 7
LEGEND
Location Map
o Lots I Parcels
o \M3ter Features
N City Limits
= Project Location
"..
"..
,.=
,~
II II
ROW
.."
s
, ,
/
47
"
)
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 06-43100-02
Project Name Annual Street Crack Seal Project
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 7 Yean;
Category StreetslHighways
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Streets I Highways
Description
The project provides for sealing of the street cracks in the following maintenance zones:
2006 - Zone 4
2007 - Zone 5
2008 - Zone 6
2009 - Zone 7
2010 - Zone I
Justification
The sealing of street cracks will significantly extend the useful life of the streets. This will extend the time frame when a costly street reconstruction project will he
necessary. The sealing of cracks in the street surface reduces/eliminates water from entering the road base and subgrade. This process reduces the freeze/thaw
cycles of the subgrade, maintaining the integrity of the road. Crack sealing is completed in a particular zone one year prior to seal coating. This allows the crack
sealing material to cure and minimize bleed through once seal coated_
New develo ments requiring crack seal are not shown on the attached ma
Expenditures
Construction
2006
96,008
96,008
2007
204,786
204,786
2008
175,225
175,225
2009
116,500
116,500
2010
117,556
117,556
Total
710,075
710,075
/
Total
Funding Sources 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Construction Seal Coat Fund 5,000 16,268 13,243 810 35,321
R & B - Crack Seal & Seal Coa 91,008 188,518 161,982 115,690 117,556 674,754
Total 96,008 204,786 175,225 116,500 117,556 710,075
Operational Impact/Other I
Sealing the street cracks will reduce routine maintenance by eliminating the source of degradation resulting from moisture in the road subgrade_
,
)
48
...... IF
I
:TII
, ,
J
.,
/,
I
I
I
. I
I
,
.
.- .
i
:v-
I
,
..
I
-,.,
'"
._',
'\ I- ,
,
/) I-'
/
S1\NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
II
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET CRACK SEAL PROJECT
2006 STREET CRACK SEAL, ZONE 4
~l H -I I I
.. P
ill
~ I
linJ.
J UIUI=~ :
I~
--Li
-
r.
-,
-.
i---
-
u
\f-l
I
... -I r
L 1
=
-
-
~n-jl
t1i:
;r-
.J
-f..h-
-
~' ;//" (i~:~
J11
I~ ~
II I~
--r::r-\ h '" ~
44-' 1-,- #/-r \\>
-t+ I- '//1 'l T\
~ [g -
,
",;,',,,
ih=j h
,r
....
lZJ
(d"-....'..s::::-J. ". \~
LEI1I\~ft)1
x:;: .....VT I "'i'\
I~
, II
,
ITl! j
I
, -{t ,
I' I
I
-
I
J
\ ' -;----1
I '
,
, I
-
-
-
I--
=--
i >+
f:-; }=
i \--, I f:rr
. ,.....,...,... 1llijj'
lillJ -
..,
dilT
H
l.>f
"..JJ
'/.
1=
~(:~J LL
J...L.. H-/
-L...... ',L
u~
i----
<:~
LM
~ I
-== I
I
I
- , .___Jj J:=!] .
f t'. '.t',
N
W*E
S
2.100 1,050 0 2.100 4,200
, Feet
c
~
':::
/ITI' =r
I
i,. (j
I I
\
Location Map
LEGEND
~'~J;f ~~ ~~
~~'" ~.~ ~}
l _ < ~ 1,4
~ if U 1M' i:>\il-:l,- ._'
'-'dr~-r:
1 ~'l--'ft- ~~- 'k
~
~
ROW
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
N City Limits
c::::::I Project Location
49
, "
~ :
v--
.L '
..j ..IJ ,J,J ,
i
---'
TTl -j
-, 2.t
'i r
f-- i
~m
.
illJl
I
I
-
==b -
/i"'-
II
-j
I I I
I
~
I ~;
; I
-
.1
'I
i
I
I I
rliTT'l , I
-
-1 ~
,
5 LiGE ND
ROW
o Lots I Parcels
o \l'J.3ter Features
IN City Limits
c::::::J Project Location
I
I
..,
01 "111
..,'..
2,900 1,450
.
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET CRACK SEAL PROJECT
2007 STREET CRACK SEAL, ZONE 5
" '
.1~i"')If'
.,... y i~~~N
,",,-, ,
, \
I'~ P r-::
~ ~
,,"iT ~'
:~ I FfITIU
Jl ~ rH 1, J~I
~ .L. '
,
.H..
s
o
J:1 I
t
I'
j]
r
U I
r:
:-....: .. .X
/? r;;,z::
:j
:,
If \ If''U:K''ir lLl I
c '\,
2.900
5,800
. Feet
~NDbVE~
Ii
50
~
i
Location Map
~~~J!n_~ ~~~
(1:'~~ R~I~~ fj:
t = ,',,' ~;o.'r 1
'O.:;j;;;: U ~R!~l~
~ '3 - ~i--, 'llQ i'" ' {o
~.~ /, ~ "'9 ~ mJI,
c '''~~-l
II
i
S1\NDbVE~
{",
Capital Improvement Plan
II
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET CRACK SEAL PROJECT
,: 2008 STREET CRAC~ SEAL, ZONE 6
LUl~ lJJlJi-i~~ IT II~ I ( h n
lUJ , 3fh:1/
r-lj r~
~~
'f---'
, ,{/
~tJl
I' I
i
} B{ I r:-::mH ']
T I :ELJ:t:::tiJF ,
: -'-~--+-iWS=' I Y ~U -f-i lL
I] i\'--r-
_ )) 1
IT!111-1'
! I
.... '~'I~h
~ ~,
", ~'-' \~--Y, ~
TJf ~
~,t Lt: j i ' u~1
I J)j ~I
(3-~Slih ,
ROUND~ u rr
,I.r n_
i ''",8iM~-I~h
~~\l
~~..:."
" F
I
!~
b I~
I
II
l?'"
i?!f '...T I
/-n
-
\\
"
O! II,.
i~
dl\
rlii
I~ Ii
~ It! I
Iii I ! I n I", I
~
Ii\.
, 'I
, 1
, I ~ 1
, I:J.
.. I
I
,
~
/~;:j ~~@1l[
)! ,'ii'
'tE GE ND
.; , -., r
R'tr=c I '-{r.;-;:;1fOh1ln
- ',' - ' '"
I 1 1f II (BfZ
Location Map
ROW
-.'
s
o Lots I Parcels
o \/\later Features
N City Limits
c:::::J Project Location
2.100 1,050 0 2,100
4200
F~\
"",,~~lf:r" ~ t1 - ~ ~
~~"C1tr ~~ ~
~ In I T. ~'I-p:F- f J
"',iliu 11 t&
'~ij'C il- ~
~'~ ~ ~
,
~
'~
~~
~
,
II II
51
'\
~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
)1
,
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET CRACK SEAL PROJECT
2009 STREET CRACK SEAL, ZONE 7
,
, I
. I
LEGEND
Location Map
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
N City Limits
= Project Location
1.-'00 700
"00
"00
-
ROW
..'
s
/'
52
~NDbVE~
Capital.lmprovement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET CRACK SEAL PROJECT
2010 STREET CRACK ZONE 1
,
/
Location Map
LEGEND
o Lots I Parcels
o \/Vater Features
l\! City Limits
= Project Location
I.~OO 700
,.~
~.aoo
....
ROW
..'
s
"
/
53
Capital Plan
j City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Tn,e Improvement
Useful Life 20 Years
Category Streets/Highways
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Streets I Highways
Project # 06-43100-03
Project Name Annual Street Mill and Overlay
Description
The Street Mill and Overlay projects will consist of milling the existing street surface and constructing a new asphalt surface. Minor shouldering and restoration
work will be included with the project. In developments that have existing bituminous curb, the curb will be replaced by concrete curb and gutter. The concrete
curb and gutter and any subgrade correction work is typically assessed to the benefiting properties. This program has been well received by the residents and will
help maintain the integrity and value of.the communities street infrastructure.
Justification
The streets in these neighbortlOods are in excess of 20 years old and are in need ofrehabilitatiOl'- The intent of this Street Mill and Overlay is to provide the
commllIlity with a high quality transportation system and maintain a constant upkeep of the City's street infrastructure.
Expenditures 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Construction 736,454 1,027,052 967,705 835,228 740,138 4,306,577
"- Total 736,454 1,027,052 961,705 835,228 740,138 4,306,571
I
Funding Sources 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Assessments 164,704 389,014 337,235 20,602 112,362 1,023,917
R & B - Overtays 571,750 638,038 630,470 814,626 627,776 3,282,660
Total 736,454 1,027,052 967,705 835,228 740,138 4,306,571
Operational Impact/Other I
The rehabilitation of the streets will reduce the routine maintenance (Crack sealing. pot hole patching, ect..) in the area. Long term, this reconditioning will prolong
the structural stability of the roadway making for a longer serviceable life.
/
54
~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET MILLAND OVERLAY (2006)
LLI
~r-
'"
I I~
I I~
IRIST N .
I I
I
N
W.E
S
"" '" , '"
~~
.-------
j
Ii
""
IJJ
""
z
." N .... I . ....... -
~lv~~~~r'~Fi 11 h
...~/i . ~~Q t-
Kf...:.\.." . d::
!,~ ~..~~ Q'
LEGEND
ROW
,
, /
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
N City Limits
=:::J Project Location
-
I
I
!_-
I ii.:; y>
I 1\ ) :
~ URVEY I
~ ' o. 0::
tsu
NO
i -N '~N
= #,e::.....~ A 0___
:18 U F \('-E~
NO. 072
R!::'(
Wi
~~;
N~\
f
-6-
:-~-
./ .....
Jl '::::J
~.........~
:y.. :.~/~ //'~ Ii(
R 'f~'~~~,,- ~.. T
7~'
V
1%
o
~J I
~~. IE)
R If" r:
.
!
Location Map
".,
,...
p'~~Ert~tJ -~~
G'~ -...,-'t'h:'f'_~~:lg , ;<
~ I" I. 7 \9:l1G f fr
)f~rn),-l ~-, r
II if l.tr tlb:\ ,- . cr' _
11 'lli --.PC ~ ~
'::;;1- ~: ;llQ ;r~c ' -<'
;g ~ ~_ ~ ctUI'
~~~' .Ii
~jj'~~' "y
55
~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET MILL AND OVERLAY (2006)
/
',:~~'~':~FH I' .','(~.~
101 I tll1 r"O "~
1~ !{~DL\EC ~'I . N
~ <O~
dt. . ~
-----7 ADDITIONj lr~ 'I ~1~ l
,~.~ I yu N~!J S EVE ~GR ~ E N ..:fl?lJ
;0 t:.
, a: lTH
<> I-
rR ~ I _ \ IT=STAyJ:ST"'"
I I
I .;-tl ~tE~~ If
as
I
EITH N ...c........:.._..r:.:.::..167THW::....!-. ~
~i .~.~I
"'-----=:: ~s I,~~'~
H
flsj
v, GRoE", I ~ -
ES ~IE' .. .. L4,,:<
w R D lit- 'i:'a~~ ..., <;..'1>" 1
A H U N T\S ~ <v'V' \_
) .c;<- ~ < .,
~~l <v~ S VER I
\, ~OLLO\i ~
~ oJv
=j(Jr f\i'l EA D S
o '@J v~~ 'Y" /
' r-
'v~
"
~~,
'f p ,
,r> \~G'lr ;
I \.t"\ ~\{' ~ ~
Location Map
LE G E N D
N
W.E ""' l-C: .~:r )"'~~
ROW ~~ -.Un 1-;; - -0--
(~'~1'0' ~ J tJ
0 Lots I Parcels ~" " ~~ f
s
,.----" Water Features ~ f. III J' lAt r.'
'----"
'''' '" 0 '''' ''''' ~~)~ ~ ~ "~
N City Limits ,-
'd~- ~~q\TI
= Project Location
...,r """~~ ~ .Ii
lil~({ 1'.-. ' ,,\
56
5l\NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET MILLAND OVERLAY (2007)
11..,1" \/l...
v
I \ I"
Ui/\~
( ~
I~R[)'N
@~ i
ACRES
I
I
I
I
;
I
I
I
I
I J
~I-
-'-
IilH .1..... j
~E ...
......
\ fi).-C-R--....~
cl I
~'"
~
""~
~1
~l
f'T. ""'.r' '?--.2
~ ~.J .;;:l
Ii'
,
lv~
~
'--
I~
I~
.- -. ----..
if.
~\)
~.- /
\\
~~
I
/
,
I
-
. m- '"'
>-~VG
<"'I. \,.. ......}
I 0'" '\'
~o
nODe I
I
"ATI-II~'
I
<-'-f~j_la
I ::J~IR'
I -
I
~!tEP
\
~J
~HITE r
OAKW H ~T E
'j r~.Jd.j<:::t ,
\
I
I I
I
.
I
" LEGEND
'i I
Location Map
ROW
..'
S
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
IN City Limits
= Project Location
'"
'"
o 510
'I''''
Fool
~'~j,fTI ~ -~~
~ ~ " ~IV "" r j
~ In' =7 \E?f-l ll1"" I r-
'" cl~~ I
'l_, 111 j 'I ill l.t'T ~,~.
'l"")t: --PC l1>' '"
r'~~l- V :~
~,{ ,W&L~I
~~~ ~~~~
"
57
I
J
II
I
I
I
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET MILL AND OVERLAY (2007)
I l -.U
REG! TERED ,,/
NO. 06' 6~;~
\67 ~
A'/\,~~A~
6\N 0 ,d~ ", ~~"$ $ I \
~ J~ii.\ \ I ~.~
IREf~~ \ \ J.' I
~\I
I
- I ~
\ I \ TU~
1 1 'L~'
i ffi I,Utij'I,' 1-11' "
J.! ~j' I
,
II I
H
LEGEND
Location Map
ROW
..'
s
o Lots I Parcels
o VVater Features
J\! City Limits
= Project Locetion
540 27'0 0 540
1,_
F"
d~~r~~b -~~
~ ~ ,~~ ~ ~ r }'
~ "_ '~~ 'V'-
\,1il,} JJ ~,;J)(J>-j,-
-F"C '<CK'\ '5I--
~ ':S;~-~IL~ "'k
~ -,( [~~
~~ ,j}"~~
~ W] ;..,,\
,
I
/i
I
58
II
J
!
/
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET MILL AND OVERLAY (2007)
, /1
GROW
OAK
VIEW
LEGEND
Location Map
G INater Features
N City Limits
==::I Project Location
"" "0
""
""
eM<
ROW
N
W.E
S
G Lots I Parceis
,
/
59
.
.
-
I
I
I .
.
\
!~~,
-
==> -
\ I I~
-1AJUliJJL i [\ I A 11,1
f/"
ril t.::l!Au \'J ~'tf
. I
\ ' I 2 b t In 0 \
r-----' ---
I I 1f
'\
pr
~'-
(
I
1\
LEGEND
ROW
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
N City Limits
c::::::J Project Location
/1
I
I
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET MILL AND OVERLAY (2007)
IlVtJJ~~.
~lV
I
(VI !"t~ 0 '!J-S I
4r I
A roO.
-
\ \L........ -l
~n~
r~l--Y
\ 0 ~11S
\~~ 0)-
\ '~ ___~$i'1
. t.. I
\ &y--
"'1 _____ J------
~'-,-) ~ --
II; "'"
\
\)
"'KE'_.';ttY
;;
..~ i_
wic--S A 1" Ii::' ....
-
f
~
JI\..~
1 ~~ ~
~\~~~~i""
_ ~ \ It:
\t,\...... ... I"'
\ ~V' it;:
\~ \"
r\~OV R
I~
\ WEST
-
4')D
L
I
~
IX
,Ii
\
j -
\
-
,KELSEY
ROUND
LAKE
AVE-
'-
~
\ \
\
I
r--,
lAW
i I
N
w*.
s
"" ". . ""
Location Map
_~~/fr.:r M K ~
~"r<t:::;:;\ , ~}
!, I -r F ~ I fr
'C~'
'1, 'rt1 ''''''
, ~ ~~~
, 'f-l:~i, ~ '-('
~ ,_f F'- ~~ a:DJ
~ rL~~ -<i
~ ^~
1,,",,
F_
60
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET MILL AND OVERLAY (2008)
rrls
}8DAV~\ DTTl
, ~~J-r1I
_ ~y) ii! {\! N
~wf'-e S , N D~ro
- I
....... rl^!~VES,;ER
~ Y~~b \
V<2l'Ji-'
"'i..~ I
V F "'-
... '<
I I
I
:::-----
~
l--
\
/
I ~ll_dEE R
....----y~....-
fA .rs
P RIA I R l E
~
MEAD9WS
.
.
-
.
.
L-,-
I
. '-12.~
-
.
/
.
a
(
:::::;:;:;:\-~ -
~~-
-
T I r'lt B-E
u,
l\~ I:: A 0 ') W
-1
~~ ADD
~
ROW
-- c--
I
~ I
\ \ /Z
N
w*"
S
"" "" 0 ""
'''' ---
\ I
!d
~
~
Location Map
LEGEND
o IN.3ter Features
N City Limits
c::::=J Project Location
,=
,-,
~~~~u~~ KL.-
a~'~=~ ~ l 'tf L;-
~ '" ,. J:::.llD- f
= '~~'
~,'" t III 1M-> '''', ~
T;'>r:- "",,'0[
~ ,,-:B!7 "lQ' ~ ""k
,~ L ~~0
~. ~~,~ ~j.~
~j h~
o Lots I Parcels
.1
'I
I
61
,I
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET MILL AND OVERLAY (2008)
ROUND
LAKE
2t.iC
Location Map
LEGEND
Feel
ROW
.4.
s
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
N City Limits
c:=:::J Project Location
1,500
750
1,500
62
~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET MILL AND OVERLAY (2009)
~
I
I
;
I
, 1I"J HAVe
I
176THAVE I jt I I ,
, 175T-l LN ' 17S'iH r'
(fj ,~~
, 1741 [1 N
I ltf
-----\ 174TH AVE _ . r,.. I~' w, ~ ~
"v n "".~
I
-l ADDITl;~ u" 2 N D'I ~1 f4 H AV
I "-- I i lANG;Jl~Tr ;;,~~~NS ~ .
I ?Mh A~fj I I l ~EfA1DD
I,/U
l;Hf
I -,
I
,
I
I~
~
=
LANGSETH
I
, -
,
"
I
I
-
\ \
I
\
Location Map
LEGEND
ROW
N
W.E
S
.m '" , '"
d~~~~ ~~ -~~
~ ~ '-',' ,~ r j
~In 'I,R~ fir-
'\., ili h Ii! u::r -cL
~ 'Cl~~. ~ "'{
~ ~'T [l ~~
~~j .~
\
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
N City Limits
= Project Location
63
II
J ~NDbVE~
I
I
,
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET MILL AND OVERLAY (2009)
..,..
-H~ I '" r11 T II///f~
ft.~1 ~i:\i ~... \'{~~~'f.9~OLr \~
\ I~ ct.1 on f--b v
:~f;'~l:';!~~T I'~ :
.~ fEIi I~,q~
~i; 0 ~H 'ifl~Et .
. I. ,i~~, dim'
111'."I<NI~of< 'k~LiE ~ I I I
., -JFi I~ i I ~ -"h = I 'j"A : ,
ffIBffi c:;:( '.... ..-;; I - I 1 I ! /
, ~~. ~ ;.; :fDf\l"F'li:: 4 ,-~ 1iJ~ 4 K
.' il~ -.l~~ =- -
'(;~,'3- -) 1
R it ..~ ~'" ~ P-
I RI~ ~L <- ~.., ~""!\"'<;'"
SUNKER,:,-': "t-.,
I
H'
WOODLAND POND
,
EJf~
y
\, \ \ \ I
1~,_1.1
~ ~-Jlli'-l IIII~
'" E s)!,'>i I fl<r .'
"RE ....l'ti~ ~'l.~ CJ
lilt'hlr~f;i ,..~rs'
Z~II !Tlt
J I' , ll~ ~ I \ I NORTH WOODS "'.,
~/ J--;:;-I:I ~,';;I,
\ L. i jNb~ rlJ~oJ
.:: .."",,',
'" ~1~ilI11p~f,ii;
~HTTT.';
<iJ!.~.~ .c
,c---Jf]f} .,1 ,i
E;I~ If Ii ""'1"1'
.A
\?j;;~,)5
~
.
2ND .0.00.
HO
1'-..
JJ "-
~ ~ll Jq-r!J~
I
1-
-
'f-
f-
d
- ...
OIH'",SNC i
i . V~,
",--';;,--C'c ,I: ,.1',1'1,;,11,;;1';,1; I:',', ;, I;;' i 'i;;i;, I
~'\}JII /10 "'A:C"'It."lliAU~ 1
.. h s !-T
f-',. J ,,"I;"E iR-At"F i '-rf
1'~ J ',. r l-r- ,--~-l=1~
.J:+~~ r~ ;,:'i',~. ";:~
.II:~~~~ ~
~J:j~r}< "",Y/fGJO T-r~'J'""~
~---~ CEi~~_lJ!~~.
V 0 N r1i'" -, I
'JC:..j ~ -;1:::: g.j' ,,~ , ;~'I'"'' ,~
c'I",..> ~ ,E i~
Location Map
"
" ,-. t-:Y
, ,-ni.l I I I li,,,;& ^"K
i+Q , t.c\l@t.. t" ~ <1
~__L:r .... . . ...... I"C-Q
..'___ ~_~34THA:::;;'_~~~ r
",'
LE G Ll'''IU
ROW
..'
s
~~'~~ I! -c~;; -~ ~
~ ~ ':"-'f'!_~:::; ~ r )
~ In 1 R ~ qr
'), if !~ ~~ .
IiI ltr' i!tilL'-"
r '$l-J~~--0 r. "'~
l'1 ~ =- , \1r [lrJ]'
~' ~~
~\
o Lots I Parcels
o \/\later Features
l\! City Limits
= Project Location
"0
~JS 0 e.7D
,
/
64
NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
-
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET MILL AND OVERLAY (2010)
. I
. .
..... ".
...'....
.
.
c m~ K ~ f:jj{f}l' 0 0 '!illll '
, ~ o ",",.5N( n r "'" ~~,,!~ "'~I tl'l
. ;' _ ~,. ",m . ---c- - r-
I ,f,r- \ \ I II r III-~~ ~U L.A r~-V T ~~lll \~ -lJ~:)HIDPE~~~-
" 4/A if- ..."~,, i ~ .;'';, ;~fR~E- '4' 1'"
fJ....L <$' V!;t1! r -----.]" lAT ~ 2N
: ,---,0 I i \ II I I /~
.' 11= flJP: I '~, c~~;;~"::,' rh '~\,<~1'f:t'
,~= ) '5rl _ IT 1" __ /
/ . ,4"'-- '\'M ffi s" .,.. ~ , ....,' \ -
...!. = - t. (= ilK 1_ TEi,{~ACE \": \
r 1
,1/ i;~~~:~m:.'
I - ,. ',' III l'
... -'>
P~v<t
'10~ .
r,5 f3 ,d)
T
\,
.
Location Map
LEGEND
ROW
N
W*E
S
'so ", . 'so
.,/~ ~ !i:~ -rt.~
K: \ ~f'!_~~ ~ r I
io So" ~ fir-
- I,'~~'
~ ~~~7 r~~'(
~~~:!.I~ III
o Lots I Parcels
o \^.later Features
I N City Limits
, I = Project Location
/
65
Capital Plan
/ City of Andover, MN
2006 thrn 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 1-2 Years
Categury Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Streets I Highways
Project #
06-43100-04
Project Name Annual Pavement Markings
Description
The pavement striping for City streets is conducted one time per year. This includes centerline striping and shoulder striping_ Striping enhances the safety of the
roadway by directing traffic to the correct lane movement.
Justification
Striping is required through the local and state agencies. A reflective standard is required. Restriping annually maintains the pavement markings to the required
standards.
Expenditures 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Improvement 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 80,000
, Total 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 80,000
/
Fuudiug Sources
R & B - ReselVe
2006
14,000
14,000
2007
15,000
15,000
2008
16,000
16,000
2009
17,000
17,000
2010
18,000
18,000
Total
80,000
80,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The pavement markings are contracted out each year adding virtually no operational impact
/
66
Capital Plan
/
City of Andover, :MN
Project # 06-43100-05
Project Name Municipal State Aid Routes I New & Reconstruct
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 20 Years
Categury StreetslHighways
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Streets I Highways
Description
The following projects are proposed to be constructed and/or rehabilitated to meet State Aid Standards. The rehabilitation prQjects will consist of milling the
existing street surface, constructing concrete curb and gutter where it does not exist, and improving stonn drainage.
*2006, Hanson Blvd (TH 242 _ Bunker Lake Blvd) $600,000. I 68th Lane (Verdin St - Crocus St) $167,400. Tulip Street $762,000
*2008, 143rd Ave (Round Lake Blvd - Xenia St) $152,250. I 47th Ave (Guarani St-7thAve) $81,700.
'2008, Nightingale Street (Crosstown Blvd - I6lstAve) $625,200.
'2009, Hanson Blvd (Bunker Lake Blvd _ Crosstown) $1,534,500. South Coon Creek Drive (Round Lake Blvd - Crosstown) $586.000. Crosstown Blvd (Andover
Blvd - Hanson) $487,500_
Justification
*2006: Hanson Blvd (TH 242 _ Bunker Lake Blvd) - City cost participation as part of County reconstruction project. I 68th Lane (Verdin St - Crocus St) - Upgrade
needed to maintain integrity of State Aid infrastructure. Swrounding area included in 2006 Overlay program. Tulip Street (16 I st Ave - Valley Drive) - New
construction to accommodate additional traffic and provide access for the proposed Meadow Creek School.
*2008, I 43rd Ave (Round Lake Blvd _ Xenia 5t) - Upgrade needed to maintain State Aid route. I47th Ave (Guarani St -7th Ave) - Upgrade needed to maintain
integrity of roadway infrastructure and meet State Aid Standards. Nightingale Street (Crosstown Blvd - 161 51 Ave) - Upgrade needed to maintain integrity of State
Aid roadway infrastructure.
'2009: Hanson Blvd (Bunker Lake Blvd _ Crosstown) - City cost participation as part of County reconstruction project South Coon Creek Drive (Round Lake
Blvd _ Crosstown) _ Upgrade needed to maintain integrity of roadway infrastructure and meet State Aid Standards. Crosstown Blvd (Andover Blvd - Hanson) - City
cost . ci tiOD as of Coun reconstruction ro' ect
"
,
/
Total
o
o
2008
859,150
859,150
2009
2,608,000
2,608,000
2010
Total
4,996,550
4,996,550
Expenditures
Construction
2006
1,529,400
1,529,400
2007
Funding Sources 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Assessments 180,000 0 25,000 208,500 413,500
Federal Funds 270,000 825,000 1,095,000
Municipal Stale Aid Funds 1,079,400 0 834,150 1,574,500 3,488,050
Total 1,529,400 0 859,150 2,608,000 4,996,550
Operational Impact/Other I
Rehabilitating the roads will reduce the amount of routine maintenance along these sections of roadway and provide a safer and higher quality transportation system.
/
67
.
I
I
'[
NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
. '"
J
Project Name: MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROUTES
RECONSTRUCT 2006
. -
JAYST -t '1_1 ::-1(/h ~)I W;;lfL~'
. ~ t0~V~/?7:9//Jl~\f\ ~. I
~ ',,~---' J f\ ' ~~~~D~"'_
-.J ;j, ~~/J--..< 13~ A '
-JZaJ1 htt I I ~I
L:9f I j 'If.
I \~b III :ft~ -;::::'l: I
I ~jfH ~): \1
i/' I "\'
i ?/j ~J '- - ;:::)
~\ M~ _~I I
I r .' ~' 1 NVK'~""f--1
. . ~.~'C .'. .", I:L I D. -.. . L
7 D 01: PAlll<lO~I"I~D
I~ ANDO\~J ""ATTS
I~ -
~ STATl~O GARDEN l
DCOn.- (
1,,- . DcoO: "....,,"'''-1
I "?IU 1m TAT~~tiV rr ~ ~ 17Ft'1 i
I -it. iTfff r 111f1 ~ JI r)-
,. II~ Ii !=.IP pn -'-- '-- f--
~ ~ . . """i-- rn-
I ~ I "~ Ii dd co - rT 1 I\..",
I -51'-. \ T I II 'm f\~", M
I ---CJ --{ r, _ i-!!Z ~
I ~ i' ~!~; IlT",n I--( '- ~~
I 1-1iY ~ L E t~ I-- -- ~ II ~~::
II~ '" I i---1 -; l>
[.1" - "' ~:iJ
.
,: !
itt:
:; f
"'
g-
Zlj
: .
rl~
t A~iDOVER
, f--~~A TI 0 N
,:,,:, I~!- / N Q' T H
t~ ~
\
8 N It.
OPER
PRO.P
I
133RD
LEGEND
Location Map
ROW
".'
s
F~et
rd~:n ~~ -~ ~
p~ '7~~~ tL
F}4 \.L
~ I,'~~'
() 'I U tt!' >11;\, teL.-
l :J"""]]'; ~ ~1,J!,L
r;3 ~tL ~;r '-{'
"1'~ ,m~Et~
-::' 15 ~/ ~)i
~i1'B.~: I Jr.,., n
IIII
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
N City Limits
c::::J Project Location
7<0
070
'<0
I
68
~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROUTES
RECONSTRUCT 2006
\
J
r
D
p!
~
~\
\
1
Location Map
LEGEND
o Water Features
l\1 City Limits
c::::::J Project Location
300 150 0
.
300
600
. Feet
ROW
.H.'
s
o Lots I Parcels
69
,
~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
/
Project Name: MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROUTES
RECONSTRUCT 2006
~
--.:;: .-----J
rl i
,
..
""\ -l
"
,
~
l~
~~-
~~.y ..~........~i!iiri
\"7~~\ -
~! '" 71:J\
11/; '" -~i
/l i III \~'
iIlilll!! H\~
H 1.(
~I \~ J\-: I
\ I I I I
I
,/
I
T1
I
17TH.!..
l'
'. . .
i~ ,
-
. .
I I
I
I
\
1
I 'I
./i~
~
~I
Gt'
,~ I'~
-
L
~Y-
,,""-'I'--- I. I,
/
'~",AV V r-
f[
"'I l II
il 1 1
I
--
I \ 1::\ I f 11 I-I
Location Map
.
/1
\\ I !!IV~ / II J,
'&K '9 I ~ I), "
\4/-- \ \\ ,
1// II 1'1 \ ! ' I ~i I
1'1 I I ~\---l! I ..~ j I
I I I kdb----J,~ cr:::=11 I III I
C/.~;7;~1)' .... " II 0'''.
-
-
1[
~-
]L
n
ROW
..'
s
o Lots IParcels
o IN.3ter Features
N City Limits
c:::::J Project Location
no 385 0 770
,
1,540
Feet
,F'~ ~),;Fm ~~ - ~ ~
(~ ,,- ~ ~ ~ " )
t, J~~~ f,4
~, IU_ld;.. W~~
\, t~ ~'1"'"",
L ;rW!~ cr:LTI
L~\~ ~
"
/
r= '"
70
I ~;-. 14&;1 A\lf:'-
L-- -/. If--
_I 1_
\ ~l -
f--II-: f-_
I I~ '1 ~'--;-
t III 'S -€ _ ..)11 AilE
\<1 ~ 7 Z
- ~ ~I' I P-
, I i j-
I 1--' 1.1'<~AIlf:' 1.1~IRn AVF--
1/ I r:J -'
"W
z
I~
,e;
10;;
T~ )
J
!
"
. i
I
NDbVE~
i
I
I
I ~ENI~-" -- .
I ~S /'
I /
i ~
i
1
I
I
I
I
,~
:~(
/
/:Z~0
1/ /)'~(Y
&<;:y~C;>
&'l.....:.....y~~
at Iff
Iq)J .
LEGEND
\
/1
I
ROW
o Lots I Parcels
o Vllater Features
N City Limits
= Project Location
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROUTES
RECONSTRUCT 2008
. : J
./,,-/
~
,---
.----:--
------- . .
!2,r
'"
,,9<
~
~
'2
-"
I \
I - - . "II ^\J ~.-
_\ :-.7 I r
___I V J I'-' I
~?L~_~\J,-~
'-----.J : L-i I 1 ~ 91
- .-". .
I / I I \~
/ I \. I I i
'\ I I I
Location Map
l:!:!i
1~
\
..'
s
~~Jftnl~~ -~~
~ ~ "-~~~ ~~ f /!
",:W '- ~~
i'llS ltt.1h1; -;::-
"I jJ,1 J:fC ~~ -E--:'
300 150
o 300
600
. Feet
71
II
II
,
/
NDbVE~ Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROUTES
RECONSTRUCT 2008
ii ..", .11
000
H
I
~
,.../
T
,
111
16 fH LJ'I
l11
I~
I~~ ~J
" !~tD~
'c. ,. ,.). ....1. [" n::rTi\i' '2/
1\ \
/
r
(
,
LEGEND
ROW
;1
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
N City Limits
= Project Location
350 175
J
.
-. -
~ 1A<:T~ A\('"
i
/l~\
j;,;
---- b L~-l
___- ME
RCUNI i
/~
1\- I
r
=--
-
L"TI-l A\I"'~
11 It..
..'
s
d~~J!J'. ~~ -~ L.-
~~"Vfi'F_~~ "'rl;
~, . ~ ~~ t /-
"iljd ~:.: Ir,..
III ltt. ~~I'q
~ ~ ~ "'~
r.. t ~L ~-\ <T
~qiJ..I ,"" a+u
~'B.~ I
o 350
700
. Feet
72
-
(}\NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
,
!~\ \
<,,<
I
, .
El TI ifTI<' L "-
II \r\h "-
~I ,lYd~
7Y '1:r~\ d\:!-
~' JL
:::j A}--~
,,,,-', <J.
-i
,
LEGEND
\
ROW
o Lots I Parcels
o IN3ter Features
N City Limits
c::::::J Project Location
/
Project Name: MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROUTES
RECONSTRUCT 2008
I [Itt'1
~~,.l"""""""\ii
'"' ~ml ,J ryj l
=-I~\' \"-
is---<
T I
~r I' /h
Rl r ~~=-- P '..1
1=-1 I
I
11
I
-w-
Ii
l 0'1i
7~B:: -"/
/ \l1+fFt~
--A1T'
~ ~+
~~ g,...."..1
, p,", ''''~, r _ F '<(; ~ . I 8 """",
m_~kD ~ \111- TI77l Y~J~~I'
g 0 t::::J ~=..:.<j; -..., 'L !'-!
l \ I~ 0C1/' iTli
>; ,
Tfl ' I I I fTiTn)' c~ --t. ~~ ,"',
i1r-''f-' ','" ~ ".f~
/}- ~ I'.I..~ ;wn:, ~"f
If ~<, 1-1 ~ ~' ,,'i\ji""
, T I '...." . ;:; ~ '
.-\ ~ T I~ IT ~~K-Y
"^ 0~,}'!' · Ii: "H I I, "m ~
.ft": : +'~~ I _~~%.;~~ i",
~t~:::~,~~1~r= L:~!t:~II'
-
'r
I
I
..'
s
850 425 0 B50
,
,
I
1
(
I
//
=
==
~
~ '
,
.:
::'
f---
-
1,700
. Feel
p~'~,t9Jl lIt ~ ~rc, ~
t:-~ t~
W""", J JS t ~k\\'q'
-~ ~1"1&f'I~\.l'>-<,
~ ~ Ir!'l~ [t::WJ
,''%J ~\ ~ ~
1= '
~V 1'1,' _ r... ~
73
~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROUTES
RECONSTRUCT 2009
I,... ~;-...;
I ~ 1:=,.11.,../.4" '\~!::~~J~
I k~ I I I I 111111 r~ W'~
I?"'f ' '1m II "
JY\ ~ \'-\ ~~ ~^ (fJ
,Y''' f1 U~~~ .~ '/
~ v ~ ~~~
I ~~~~
_ . ~ III I ~ J
~
......
~~\~.
~ ~,
IlE f--
!:B l=
ITl ,t.f '
WI
J' I
~~. I
I.
1,-
fl I
F
J
~
!:-i$f,':,..
'!t
rJ ... '.",
~..~'h-.,.,.,
~UJ
I ..
/lj
:VI
II~~"
,~i
I I I
\ I I
/
.--+-..'J...m
,- .::;
'<'T ....;
i--' ,
f." ,L rti
-\\\ '1 ifi'\\\\I1
,.
Y'
i-\
r-... I
I
Sl>f.!SHIIolE
"""
-
h ~
" I
I,=~~
'I
-,
,
--
/ .
\~"
'il ,=iff ~'-,i "~ .~ <IT ~
;::3;,::1 ,. " ji::
~'ti_~i~~ '~I' ,m'fi t~
~ -..j-I., ',j ,v;..'
e- ~~1r il ~I
~ 'i~, ?rrmTfftnrrn". h I
"el: 122if.oJJi- Ih II' \r[]~ _. . LJ Jil v_" ) WI El Wi , I I ~ I
~-:'\___ !~.~Lf8~~ ~;~ ~, II II ~
? . ~. ~
LE'GE N D
.-,
.."_n'\;)
IX -,
f
-
-v,
TI
J.
:-1 I,
Location Map
ROW
.."
s
C2) Vllater Features
N City Limits
c=:::J Project Location
1,300 650 0 1,300
.
2,600
. Feet
E~~J:f ~tJ -K ~
(~" 'J<ot _~:;:;:;'1 ~.. r)
l-In " R~ Il-> 'Ir
i." = ;::'>-'~~'
"LTfi ~~i~
~ {~)i-- ~~~_~'
51<>" ~ ~ ~~
~li'i:'t;~ .\
C2) Lots I Parcels
/
74
1
I
I
\.I~~
tgjLLm
r-: -,.;..
B 1=
>,j~ ~
~4\:' Pf I"i
.."..,... Jam..
Irfi'\'\\ \
~NDbVE~
.
\ I 1\\ I 1
~::;;-~TC t:~(.lSSTC'''''t<l al.VO
SUNSHINE
PARK
I
If's
; L t:l~
LJ!.U 0 8: .~
--l ~=~,
E~,f~EEI~
~ E~,r~S ~!
t>o. i~1 /~I
>" ~
~~: -/II-r
r~11 11'~A
RUN
. "
y - ,,-,,
- ~v'
.' .1 I~ ~~
?
~
I
<7
, I
~
" I
, erR
~ '~l
~,
~=j~~
.....,...., "- =t"'" ":J~-j(I 'ir
,;,.1.' ""'.;
,'E:G END
ROW
o Lots I Parcels
,
o Water Features
N City Limits
c::::::J Project Location
1,200
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROUTES
RECONSTRUCT 2009
l-Y
Jliil
:f
~~n~~~ '~y
N:t :J' F
11 ,"~"EI
~
~\:
IjU//~
~
~
l~U
b~BAR
-3. '"+
:;'~'
I
I
i
i
,"".BWI'!'
I
1- z
f-
R ~.1::
.II~:)::
;;:
~ ::r11- ~
I
'-
r-
-F:. 7-
~
'DO
1.""
11
r~~
IE- ~~~.,
[ill v I'/?:
~ :) ~ ce;~
:> -= ~~
0'- ,~
S I~~,~
~ 'j ~?< \~
COON CREEK \\~",.,
oc"'Z!'1k-
Location Map
F'~ ~Jftn L~ d - J(,~
~~ y~~~~--" ~ f,)
~ 1" ,-/ ~ _;-- I
~ ,,' ~ =-
),il l'IiI ~
\ "t~ .~.~
cj ? L
~~
~ ' ..
~Vi:l:"it! "Wlf '\.....
"
~ Ii ,- ~f-
Ii '- J1 UI~"",
ill1 ~~"C"""'...
lil[)[]] n cJ?~~'r P~Jr
.', t= "- f "'.
...... ,,< -1'f.1
II: i':X.~;;; ,I i'ITT
,,"YO, -rat-,~;;::::: ~ ,
lilllll .... ~'~"""
..'
s
I
0#"..
Fest
.
75
~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROUTES
RECONSTRUCT 2009
-:-;,,,,1 I i.1 \
'I I iih-
,
I ROUND ....>- ~
LAKE >,,~
, J, .;- :: I T ~_. ~.
,:,- II II""Th ' 1A;V\l;'
IIIOR -4:r- rl _Tl<~~- ! ~T /2 ;\~a; ^ .//,,,
IF ~~ -':z:- ^ . ~ I I I I I III Z\/~~ :?-.";::: q
" II =t. . II Il.. &, ~'lT I. I I~ ~ r== 'I I I I III ~'LSf f!t~ !JK:}}- : ).
~! ~~ "(' , TI I' ,l./; , I I ~I ' t- .'rl""- "
r.' , II, I , t::f'~z I' 'J-'" 11 q', ~ .!:
,,' ~I \l ' vJ:d./n.. l'- r J:>" ". 'fi' ,;< ~ Iii n '::I,'
"= " (,/- ~J '" V! .- i\-- " -'~ ""
"'iii\, .,.". ~~ 111~T1[~: ' - ;~fPi -~: rrntn~ ~ j ~ ' ))
/' '.,-n"'1' ~ _ ~ ~,,3>~ '/" UT litIr' tlJ\ l- /~
-L ITJ:r::ffi rm i~ ---"vi ?:..t , , - H'l- -i hT~' I"
I: T, "",,' ',." L t' M
'C' '.EGEND",..I:)"",""""',i "!I:" oca Ion ap [) I"
w4fN E d~~4u: ~ R~
~ ~'\ 'fi'C ~ ~' f,}
s " '3~ '1,;4- I
"ijit 11!1- ~~d:
~ :s;~j-JJi" ~ -"'k-
Cd~[~~
, ~~ ~1t)f'
'tt~ ";l1f }... \
/
~~~U.J)
I I '85;
, i\\' -L ,. \\
/I~ ,\ I~!
I _
-
-
.
"-
"
L
u
-
_ '0
~
ROW
o Lots I Parcels
o Vllater Features
N City Limits
1,100
sso
o
1,100
2,200
. Feet
c::=:l Project Location
.\
.
76
\
)
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 10 Years
Category StreetslHighways
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Streets I Highways
Project # 06-43100-06
Project Name Signal Upgrade - Bunker Lake BlvdIRound Lake Blvd
Description
The existing lights in the traffic signal at Bunker Lake Bnulevard and Round Lake Boulevard will be replaced with LED's.
Justification
LED's use less power than the current lights (90% reduction in energy costs can be realized) and they have a 7-10 year replacement cycle. This is the last signal in
the City that does not have LED lights. The long term energy cost savings exceeds the cost to replace the lights.
Expenditures
Technology Improvements
2006
20,000
20,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
20,000
20,000
Total
/
Funding Sources
Municipal State Aid Funds
Other Municipality
2006
10,000
10,000
20,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
10,000
10,000
20,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other l
Upgrade of the system will reduce annual maintenance and replacement costs.
\,
J
77
Capital Plan
) City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Usefnl Life 25 Years
Category Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Streets I Highways
Project #
06-43100-07
Project Name Intersection Upgrades
Description
2006 _ Construction of a traffic signal and turn lane improvements on Hanson Blvd at 139th Ave/Jay 5t for access to Andover Station North. The improvements are
required by the Anoka County Highway Departroent for new developments along County Roads. ($450,000) 2006 - Constuction of turn lanes and a traffic signal at
the intersection of Crosstown Blvd and Nigtingale St Realignment of the intersection will be looked at to incryase safety. ($] 50,000) 2008 - Construction of a
traffic signal at the intensection of South Coon Creek Dr and Round Lake Blvd. Minor lane widening may be needed but turn lane construction would not be
included in this project. ($250,000) 2008 -Intersection upgrades, including construction ofa trafie signal, at Hanson Blvd and I 33rd Ave. This will be part of the
Coun 's Hanson Blvd Reconstruction Proect This si aI will include a cost share with Anoka Coun and the Ci of Coon Ra ids. ($150,000)
Justification
Intersection upgrades are necessary due to the increased development and demands aD the transportation system. the need for safety improvements, and to comply
with Anoka County Highway Department requirements.
Expenditures
Construction
2006
600,000
600,000
2007
2008
400,000
400,000
2009
2010
Total
1,000,000
1,000,000
Total
)
Funding Sources 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Assessments 200,000 200,000
Municipal Stale Aid Funds 400,000 400,000 800,000
Total 600,000 400,000 1,000,000
Operational Impact/Other I
Improvements will improve the flow of traffic and will improve the safety ofvehic1es, pedestrians and bicyclists.
\
I
78
II ~NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: COUN1Y INTERSECTION UPGRADES
Location Map
LEGEND
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
I
I N City Limits
\ I c::= Project Location
'I
1.9')0 950
1,llO!I
~ II
ROW
.+.
s
79
Capital Plan
I City of Andover, MN
Project # 06-TRAIL-Ol
Project Name Construct Bikeway! Walkway Corridors
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 25 Years
Category Trail Construction
Priority ] - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Streets I Highways
Description
Construct bituminous bikeway/walkway trails along corridors identified in thc.Andover Comprehensive Trail Plan. 2006 - Construct a trail along the east side of
Crosstown Blvd from 139th A venue to 14lst Lane ($30,000) and along Bunker Lake Blvd from Hanson Blvd to Crane St ($30,000). 2007 - Station Parkway from
Thrash St to Jay St ($60,000). 2008 _ north side of Crosstown Blvd from Nightingale St to Hansoo Blvd ($100,000). 2009 - Construct a trail along I 57th Avenue
from Prairie Road to Kumquat St ($230,000). 2010 - the west side of Crosstown Blvd from South Coon Creek to Andover Blvd ($75,000).
Justification
Improve pedestrian and multi-modal access to various destinations within and externally to the city.
The trails have reviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission. These trails that are proposed are a combination of interest by the Park Commission and City
Council.
Expenditures
Construction
2006
60,000
60,000
2007
60,000
60,000
2008
100,000
100,000
2009
230,000
230,000
2010
75,000
75,000
Total
525,000
525,000
Total
/
Funding Sources
Trail Funds
2006
60,000
60,000
2()07
60,000
60,000
2008
100,000
100,000
2009
230,000
230,000
2010
75,000
75,000
Total
525,000
525,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Additionallong-tenn maintenance and snowplowing will be necessary.
80
, NDbVE~ Capital Improvement Plan
,I
Project Name: TRAIL PROJECTS, 2006-2010
,/' , ,: " ::!
, i'
I rrJ1,".: ,
,'I if " " :T T [,h ! p 1.f---1 r
"
-t,z:ili: ~ li 17~
j- f-- 'TI.:'
- .., f..--
E?- """-.." ,
~ T '\ r\
...'~<' , ~ f--- 1
' II
" V;' (1M f- I I"""
~ m ' ' ~
- II u.u
2-
. . t=:
H ./ ,". !
,
,
"I L,- I .." r:
'=1 - .'
"
" ~
'. -....:.
i~ ri .x' k
!I ,.....7,
~. 2008 l
",' II "~
ROUND .:., )
LAKE I
I -"""i'T' 7 "i"l.frl
I L-
". I
2000
. "",.."
,.,."
..
'. ,
I
1
I
07
t; ~-.;~~"
LEGEND Location Map
N
ROW W*E ~f':\~~rt ~~ -~~
("- Lots I Parcels ~ ~"'lTf ~ ~ r J!.
----./
s iLl, R ~ fir
0 Water Features .(,250 2,125 D ~ '~~
.(,250 IlfIT ttt ~ ~
N City limits Feel ...Pi" '
~.~' "1Q "'~
==::J Project Location C; ~ ~~ cr'JI
.... ~ s1l~~ ~
IH' \. '\
,
I
/
/
81
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 7 Years
Category Improvements
Priority ] - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Water
Project # 06-49400-02
Project Name Rehabilitation of Wells
Description
The motor, pwnp and column pipe are taken out for inspection and worn parts are replaced. The well is televised to detennine the depth and condition. If the well
is at or close to the original drill depth everything is put back in place. The well may need to be cleaned out to the original depth if there is a substantial decrease in
the depth.
Justification
To make sure the well is operational to wbat it is designed for and to correct any problems that may affect our ability to produce the amount of water needed to meet
the demand. A complete inspection and maintenance overhall is performed on each well a minimwn of once every seven (7) years.
Expenditures 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Improvement 40,000 45,000 45,000 130,000
Total 40,000 45,000 45,000 130,000
./
Funding Sonrces
Waler Fund
2006
40,000
40,000
2007
45,000
45,000
2008
45,000
45,000
2009
2010
Total
130,000
130,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
This would be done at such a time that it would not affect the demand needs of the system. Typically done late fall.
82
Capital Plan
/ City of Andover, MN
Project # 06-49400-03
Project Name Water System Security Improvements
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 20 Years
Category Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Water
Description
Fencing around the water tower at city halL
Justification
Improvements have been identified in the City's Water Distribution System Vulnerability Assessment. Safety improvements as identified will assist in keeping the
municipal water supply safe for the residents.
Expenditures
Improvement
2006
15,000
15,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
15,000
15,000
Total
Funding Sonrces
Water Fund
2006
15,000
15,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
15,000
15,000
Total
I """""'" Imp"""",~
83
/
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 15-20 Years
Category Utilities
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Water
Project #
07-49400-01
Project Name Water Tower Painting
Description
Painting of the water tower closest to City Hall, including a new City logo.
Justification
The tower is going to be in need of painting to maintain its appearance and to protect it from wear and tear. A new City logo should also be put on the tower that
show's what the City of Andover is about
Expenditures
Improvement
2006
2007
350,000
350,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
350,000
350,000
\
)
Total
Funding Sources
Capital Equipment Reserve
Water Trunk Fund
2006
2007
242,000
108,000
350,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
242,000
108,000
350,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other 1
This is a scheduled maintenance that should be budgeted for.
"
/
84
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
)
Type Improvement
Useful Life 50 Years
Category Improvements
Priority I - High
Coutact City Engineer
Department Water
Project #
07-49400-02
Project Name 143rd Ave Water Main Improvements
Description
Water main would be constructed along 143rd Avenue from Round Lake Blvd to Woodbine Street Water main stubs from the existing systems in Round Lake
Boulevard and l43rd Avenue west of Woodbine Street are ready for connection. This section of water main would provide a looped system for the area south and
west of Round Lake. Costs associated with construction of the water main would be paid for from the Trunk Water Fund.
Justification
143rd A venue is a State Aid route and is scheduled for mill and overlay in 2007 (roadway paid for through State Aid funds in the Overlay project). At this time it
would be advantageous to install water main to serve adjacent properties and loop the distribution system while the streets are under construction. This line would
function as a trunk line that would ultimately serve areas south and east of Round Lake that are not currently served with City water.
Expenditures
Construction
2006
2007
83,000
83,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
83,000
83,000
Total
J
Funding Sources
Water Trunk Fund
2006
2007
83,000
83,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
83,000
83,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other l
Additional maintenance and flushing requirements for the water main system will result.
/
85
~NDbVih~
Capital Improvement Plan
/
City of Andover, Minnesota
Incorportated 1974
Project Name: 143RD AVENUE WATER MAIN
IMPROVEMENTS
", /y rr---f'------- ""
"
~ ~~
~~
~ i .~
,
U U) Os
t~ ffi QLLI~
-tm-bViP p
.. ~ ~ LLI
'--~ ~ ~
),' \ ~l~ ~ - 8VB
:'i
~ [,J,
- CtiMM PL.3l'
"<
,
J.-
:~
191
'. ,.~
:f '':';
f~
~~ ';z::J
:;: .ii
r~ r~ 1
l
/
~I=
/<$;<$;2)> tt. e---
0J<Q&':Y It.';'
~~~ <<t~
cr ~<t,CJ
~V ') ~DD
T ftft5 tJ(
\ .\ I
... In,lA -~.._'~
-., _ _I',..);" .al,.-
o
/"7
z
::>
I
~
,..
o
500 Feet
Location Map
~~~ ~ -~~
ljn r E;oFZ1L- f~}
"iliJ1,.{'-;;~ Ir
~ Tf ~~~ 'J'
~ "j:~, itf'
~ ~~" o;:0J
"":BM ~
-m.1l'\.. \'
LEGEND
ROW
0 Lots I Parcels
0 Water Features
'. Iv City Limits
/
0 500
Project Location
N
W*E
S
fOut
\
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
/
Type Improvement
Useful Ufe 50 Years
Category Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Water
Project #
08-49400-01
Project Name Construct Water Tower
Description
Construct a 2 million gallon elevated storage tank adjacent to the water treatment plant.
Justification
In order to adequately supply treated water at an acceptable pressure to the entire distribution system in Andover, a two million gallon water tower must be
constructed near the water treatment plant The existing 500,000 water tower in the southwest part of town would be demolished as part of this process.
Cnnstruction of this tower and demolition of the existing 500,000 gallon tower would elintinate the low pressure zone currently in the southwest part of town.
Expenditures
Construction
2006
2007
2008
2,950,000
2,950,000
2009
2010
Total
2,950,000
2,950,000
Total
Funding Sources
Water Revenue Bonds
2006
2007
2008
2,950,000
2,950,000
2009
2010
Total
2,950,000
2,950,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Additional maintenance and monitoring would be required of the Sewer and Water department
"
'. /
87
Capital Plan
) City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 50 Years
Category Improvements
Priority I -JIigh
Contact City Engineer
Department Water
Project # 09-49400-01
Project Name Water Main along South Coon Creek Drive
Description
Install a 12" water main along South Coon Creek Drive from I 45th Avenue to Jonquil Street
Justification
Construction of a water main along South Coon Creek Drive will allow the existing water distribution system between the east and west sides of town to be looped.
The only existing connection between the two parts of town is along Bunker Lake Boulevard. Looping of the system will allow treated water to be continuously
supplied to all residents in town on the water system It will also help alleviate the pressure variance that is experieneed between the east and west sides of town.
Coon Creek Boulevard is scheduled for reconstruction in 2009. It would be advantageous to construct the water main concurrently with the roadway reconstruction.
Expenditures
Improvement
2006
2007
2008
2009
500,000
500,000
2010
Total
500,000
SOO,OOO
Total
Funding Sources
Water Trunk Fund
2006
2007
2008
2009
500,000
SOO,OOO
2010
Total
500,000
500,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Additional maintenance and flushing requirements for the water main system will result.
/
88
NDbVE~
Capital Improvement Plan
I
I
i
I
Project Name: WATER MAIN ALONG SOUTH COON CREEK DRIVE
ijL! I I I I 1
'rtJ
tAL
l,.....it/.
I ~ _ i---:J... r~
, H , r:'-:::::" COONCRl:tJdl "..
)J.~i d 1 III '
III' ~i\:{\lY\ fIf'~
~ '/~\.
.. ' if
," -
1 :] ':J "
WOOClANP i>ONO ~t+ "
12:
~~
I~
I~
-\
"\
I
I
f1
-
0-
~
L
~taal~ .
E 1t 1
]:\2:
-:::
-
..~
;,.;
(
~.
S
I"
"
--
,
I IT
.'
11
I t
II'
~
fff-,~
. T 1Trr!!i
..f.'.i- ;,,[ / II
" .
I I F~~;;;
',<,.n:.n
"'I <.'.
"'~/1
'", 1"<
,
.,I~I"'I'
't 1t
.i.....J;;,- I.,"
'::/
" '~i.,
.. f'.. ^~t,
, ~,-I ~ /\ II~!.~,\ L."1'~
1......1"..
Location Map
'.
HIP AOO.
~
'j.
l
tIP ..0
I
~<TI 1,-
.. :NP~~~ I I r
~~p I' :r
,,~ f- ~~
..lJ i IV, 4> A 12~,0
I TTTI \r...:....~rv ..,}\ \.. '(f- h: ,.~ ~ ~'> /
1 I .. I I I:::----~) '1'''' /
iY"'",. ,..'
~
t
.J
ji
LEGEND
ROW
N
W*E
S
990 'os 0 '"
d~~4ll:X -R:~
H-';:\ ", o~ __r:;:;;\ . g r )-
~In .' :";o~\'-' fIr
~ !'..'~~;
~tllIll ~ ~~
'6 ..J .J.t; ;Il~ -:1 "' {:
r'$.z:::t., -= ~\
~ ~..J: ~ ~ [~
~~~
~jft\,\ ~
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
N City Limits
r::::::J Project Location
I
'I
II
89
Capital Plan
/ City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life Unassigned
Category Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Water
Project #
09-49400-02
Project Name Demolish 500,000 Gallon Water Tower
Description
Demolish the existing 500,000 gallon water tower located on the west side oftown.
Justification
The existing 500,000 gallon water tower will be demolished and replaced by a new two million gallon water tower so the City's water distribution system can be
managed under one pressure zone, providing treated water to all residents on the system.
Expenditures
Improvement
2006
2007
2008
2009
175,000
175,000
2010
Total
175,000
175,000
Total
"
Funding Sources
Water Trunk Fund
2006
2007
2008
2009
175,000
175,000
2010
Total
175,000
175,000
Total
Operational ImpactJOther I
Maintenance of the existing water tower will no longer be required.
1
90
Capital Plan
\
/ City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Improvement
Useful Life 50 Years
Category Improvements
Priority ] - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Water
Project # 09-49400-03
Project Name Chapman's Addition Water Main Improvements
Description
Water main would be constructed throughout the Chapman's Additions. Water main stubs from the existing system along Round Lake Boulevard are located at the
west end of these developments. ready for connection. Costs associated with construction of the water main would be assessed to benefiting properties. This area
currently has sanitary sewer.
Justification
The Chapman's Additions streets are scheduled for mill and overlay in 2009 (roadway paid for under the R&B funds in the Overlay projects). At this time it would
be advantageous to install water main to serve these properties while the streets are under construction. The water main would provide an adequate distribution
system to the neighborhood. This area is already served with sanitary sewer.
Expenditures
Construction
2006
2007
2008
2009
325,000
325,000
2010
Total
325,000
325,000
Total
/
Funding Sources
Assessments
2006
2007
2008
2009
325,000
325,000
2010
Total
325,000
325,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other . I
Additional maintenance and flushing requirements for the water main system will result.
)
91
Project Name:
CHAPMAN'S ADDITION WATER MAIN
IMPROVEMENTS
II
I
Sh\~l)bVE'~
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Andover, Minnesota
Incorportated 1974
-~~~
~
sit
I;~
~~
oli
THE
FARMSTEAD
.l.ll
D CRJ EK
I
>-. /
ien. nnE it ~<> 'f..<> ~'"
'OJ ,.., i.. I----
211 D liD) 3RP J DD
- '., .. N l--
, . I ~
, Df. ~ TI AOD ~ riJ- ~i
~iij-
"" ,~;; ~ ~
A
~ -
, ~ C' '0 ~.~
/ C!iAt>M NO. '0
'. / CH TIl AllD I f
+,f-''i;y)~
6T A D
~~
;~ J"" ;;::
~
,= \;:;;; E'" "'- .....
Ul \ / -
-
Ul
iii~ d ....~
-
~ ~~1- t 'D / ,
/~ \ I
5~ \III;)D...... \ --...v ~
,
IV City Limits
o Project Location
500
o
500 Feet
,
Location Map
p~~Rn ~~ -~~
~ ""'~ ~ ~ r )
~n I \/::;t.< l-LI-- ti/r-
r => .0:1 '~~.
'L iT 111 U:':!L ~ 11;\, -r'
'I t't'i'-).t: J: fQ '-S') lb .
~- ~h g; ijI ",'
I:L al- ~ 'il
"-
~~ ~~
LEGEND
ROW
N
W+E
S
o Lots I Parcels
o Water Features
'out
Capital Plan
J City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Project #
09-49400-04
Project Name Smith's Green Acres Water Main Improvements
Type Improvement
Useful Life 50 Years
Category Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Water
Description
This area is one of the few remaining neighborhoods within the MUSA boundary that does not have City water. Water main is currently located at the intersection
of 138th Avenue and Crocus Street south of this development Water main would be constructed north along Crocus Street to serve the Smith's Green Acres
development Stubs would be extended east along Crocus Street to serve the Northwoods Addition in the future. .
Justification
The Smith's Green Acres development is scheduled to have its streets reconstructed as a part of the 2009 Overlay Program. This water main will provide a public
water distribution system to this neighborhood and relieve residents from failing wells and provide adequate flIe protection. Construction of the water main system
should coincide with reconstruction of the streets.
Expenditures
Construction
2006
2007
2008
2009
572,000
572,000
Total
2010
Total
572,000
572,000
/
Funding Sources
Assessments
2006
2007
2008
2009
572,000
572,000
Total
2010
Total
572,000
572,000
Operational Impact/Other I
Additional maintenance of the water main will result This will add additional flushing to the water main system.
/
93
,I ~NDbVE~
/1
!
Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name: SMITH'S GREEN ACRES WATER
MAIN IMPROVEMENTS
~~X\J
~\\ \
I 4ffigS 0 l F \\~J.,:L~Rm i ~ N "I
OLANO POND \,--)i~ ',1"144 '
2ND ADO. \ ~:::''7;.
\
\
I
-
SIMlli\l~
, s ~r-"
Id~l.i., "'"'''S
1 iF
, ~ \ Il ~ '~. ,,~;:x ".:;
II \ I J- _0- Nb~i,. l'Q 0"'
IT~!r'.r ' " ,,'" "
.tl,~ ,-Vi : ....Ih. Jr; IA-Eollpl.t~ j
r,J -,~~~,'b
T T I \ I ~~<Y~. """~. I I----j ,J! ~
III/ Illf lV~~ ..p.~A(2
II I III! \~---~nvf\' ~1-11--- 1-1
1 1Z I~ I
I ,"1$~ K -i~
1- ~ .~
~ olc.ttt:~,I(:'<'r-A'!"'"
Q MIEA~H I ~'"
;~
'.
\
~
I--
I--
,I--
1
f-
"~ 139T
~ ,I- "
". /
, ,~('Q<1-
<>>......* ~/
"
1~
~~
t\
~
Tuni L-
a
'K
13~'llC.VE. / I
I
Location Map
LEGEND
ROW
..'
s
Feel
~~ ~~ u ~'t:; J:' L-,-
H~'-"-'Fi3 ~~ ~ y
I/o ,~~l- 11)
~ Il.l ttT' l~i ~
~ ~t-~ -, ~ y--j!!>.(;
Ij ~ciU:
"]~~
o Lots I Parcels
o I.^J.3ter Features
N City Limits
c::::::J Project Location
780
'"
no
'III
94
,
. ,
EQUIPMENT
. /
Capital Plan
/
City of Andover, MN
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
2006
thru
2010
Department
Project# Priority 2006
2007
2008
2009
2010 Total
Building
Replacement - Blazer #5
07-42400-01
2
22,000
22,000
Building Total
22,000
22,000
Central Equipment
NC Recovery/Recyding/ Recharging Equipment
Canopy for Fuel Island
06-49950-01
09-49950-01
1
3
6,000
30,000
6,000
30,000
Central Equipment Total
6,000
30,000
36,000
Engineering
GPS 06-4200Q.02 40,000 40,000
Replacement - Total Station 09-4200Q.02 21,000 21,000
Replacement- Blazer #11 09-42000-03 2 30,000 30,000
Engineering Total 40,000 51,000 91,000
\
./
95
Department
I
Project# Priority
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010 Total
> 5,000]
'~< ;,i ~,,;~
^~
9i,00li
Facility Management
Electric Scissor Uft
06-4196lJ.1l5
25,000
25,000
Facility Management Total
25,000
25,000
Fire
Rescue Trucks 06-42200-01 35,000 40,000 75,000
New Mobile Data Tenninals in Rre Trucks 07-42200-01 2 30,000 30,000
Waternce rescue boat 07-42200-02 20,000 20,000
Replacement - Hydraulic Rescue Equipment 07-42200-03 2 30,000 30,000
Hose Washerlf ester 07 -422CJO.ll4 2 8,000 8,000
I Replacement - Rre Marshall Vehide 06-42200-01 2 30,000 30,000
Replacement- Fre Tanker #31 08-4220lJ.1l2 295,000 295,000
Replacement- Rre Engine #11 09-4220lJ.1l1 400,000 400,000
Replacement- ladder Truck #11 10-4220lJ.1l1 850,000 850,000
Replacement- Rre Chiefs Vehide 10-42200-02 2 40,000 40,000
Fire Total 35,000 128,000 325,000 400,000 890,000 1,n8,000
"'_ r_" ~ ___ ^"_/"""~~-?"'":'
1 Equip '!lent .Bo~d
}.',
:s" ,'-<
,
L
r,'-!
Park & Rec - Operations
Replaeement- Cushman Truckster #546
Replacement- 1-ton Dump wI Snow Removal #511
Lawn Sweeper
Broom Attachment
Replacemenl- Se~-Propelled 48' Sweeper
06-4520lJ.1l1
06-4520lJ.1l2
06-4520lJ.1l3
06-4520lJ.1l5
07-45200.01
22,000
60,000
30,000
5,500
2 20,000
117,500 20,000
22,000
60,000
30,000
5,500
20,000
Park & Rec - Operations Total
137,500
/
96
Department Project# Priority 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
J
Park & Rec - Projects
Oakview Park 06-4520Hl.( 50,000 50,000
Park & Rec - Projects Total 50,000 50,000
Planning & Zoning
Replacement- Fonl Taurus #15
07-41910-01
2
20,000
20,000
Planning & Zoning Total
20,000
20,000
/
Storm Sewer
Replacement- Street Sweeper #171
06-43150-01
'1
150,000
150,000
Storm Sewer Total
150.000
150,000
Street Signs
Replacement- Sign Truck #410
07-43170-01
2
75,000
75,000
Street Signs Total
75,000
75,000
. ,
) Streets / Highways
97
Department Project# Priority 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Dump Truck wI Snow Removal 05-43100-09 190,000 190,000
/
Replacement - Tree Chipper #509 05-43100-10 40,000 40,000
Replacement - Dump Truck wI Snow Removal #197 07-43100-01 200,000 200,000
SeW contained spray patcher 07-43100-ll2 150,000 150,000
Replacement - Dump Truck wI Snow Removal #195 07-43100-03 200,000 200,000
Replacement - Hot Asphalt Box 08-43100-01 40,000 40,000
Streets / Highways Total 230,ODO 55D,ODO 4O,ODO 820,000
Water
Replacement -1-lon Van 1lfi7
05-49400-ll1
40,000
40,000
40,000
Water Total
40,000
'-
98
)
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-42400-01
Project Name Replacement - Blazer #5
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact Building Official
Department Building
Description
Replace Unit #5, a 1995 SIO Blazer used for building inspections with 99,957 miles. The Building Department puts on approximately 9,000 miles per year on this
unit In 12 years the unit should have approximately 110,000 miles on it
Justification
This vehicle is past the 10 year replacement period. It should be replaced while there is still a trade-in value or used to replace an older vehicle in another
department.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
2007
22,000
22,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
22,000
22,000
"
Total
/
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2007
22,000
22,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
22,000
22,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
This vehicle is used every day for inspections and continued reliability is required.
"-
./
99
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 06-49950-01
Project Name Ale RecoverylRecyclingl Recharging Equipment
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Centra! Equipment
Description I
NC ReeyclinglReeharging/Recovery equipment is needed to keep us incompliance with the law. This equipment would include the charging station, recycling
station, vacuum pump. heat gun and misc. tools. We have been borrowing one for a number of years. It is time to purchase our own.
Justification I
The City needs to have ifs own NC equipment rather than borrowing it all the time.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
6,000
6,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
6,000
6,000
Total
Funding Sources
Central Equipment Fund
2006
6,000
6,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
6,000
6,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
!We would have it here all the time. more productivity.
j
100
)
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 09-49950-01
Project Name Canopy for Fuel Island
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 20 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 3 - Low
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Central Equipment
Description
This would be a canopy to cover the fuel pumps and Gasboy computer equipment
Justification
The canopy would keep the fuel pumps, gasboy equipment and operators dry and help keep sun damage to a minimum.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
2007
2008
2009
30,000
30,000
Total
2010
Total
30,000
30,000
Funding Sources
Central Equipment Fund
2006
2007
2008
2009
30,000
30,000
Total
2010
Total
30,000
30,000
Operational Impact/Other I
This canopy would be used when the entire fuel system is moved to the new site on the land west of Public Works.
I
101
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
I Project # 06-42000-02
Project Name GPS
Type Equipment
Useful Life 5-10 years
Category Equipment
2006 thru 2010
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Engineering
Description I
Purchase of a GPS unit for completing topographic surveys for construction., data collecting, and mapping purposes.
Justification I
The GPS unit will increase productivity and allow for accurate base mapping of the City's utilities. The unit would be used by Engineering, Forestry, Public Worlcs,
and the Parks Department
Expenditures
Equipment
/
Funding Sources
Cap~al Projects Levy
Drainage & Mapping Fund
Park Improvement Funds
R & B - Reserve
ROW Utility Management
San~ary Sewer Fund
Storm Sewer Fund
Water Fund
Total
I
IO---Im-
Total
2006
40,000
40,000
Total
40,000
40,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
2006
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
40,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
40,000
102
'.
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
/
Project #
09-42000-02
Project Name Replacement - Total Station
Type Equipment
Useful Ufe 10 years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact City Engineer
Department Engineering
Description
Replace the existing Total Station. which is approximately 8 years old and utilizes outdated software. The Engineering Department utilizes the Total Station to
stake construction projects (curb and gutter,sewer, water main, etc) and to complete topographic survcys for design purposes. The Total Station is used almost on a
daily basis during the construction season by the Engineering Department Replacement of the Total Station would be approximately every 10 years upon purchase
of a new unit
Justification
The hardware and software associated with the Total Station becomes more obsolete every year. It would be beneficial to replace this unit while it still has some
trade value towards purchase of a new unit.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
2007
2008
2009
21,000
21,000
Total
2010
Total
21,000
21,000
/
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2008
2009
21,000
21,000
2007
Total
2010
Total
21,000
21,000
Operational Impact/Other I
Upgrading the unit will allow for increased efficiency by the Engineering Department as new hardware and software technologies are incorporated into the
surveying discipline.
l
103
/
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Project II
09-42000-03
Project Name Replacement - Blazer #11
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact City Engineer
Department Engineering
Description
Replace Unit #11, a ]995 SIO Blazer with 54,500 miles. The Engineering Department puts about 6,000 miles per year on this vehicle. After 12 years, it will have
approximately 72.000 miles on it This unit would make a good intern vehicle or spare vehicle.
Justification
I
This vehicle is at the 12 year replacement period and a new vehicle will keep maintenance costs ~own.
Expenditures
Equipment
2008
2010
Total
30,000
30,000
Total
2009
30,000
30,OOD
2006
2007
I
Fuuding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2008
2009
30,000
2007
Total
2010
Total
30,000
30,000
30,000
Operational Impact/Other I
Low maintenance costs and no downtime.
104
j
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 years
Category Facility Management
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Facility Management
Project # 06-41960-05
Project Name Electric Scissor Lift
Description I
An Electric Scissor Lift and Trailer that will transport the tulit to all of the cities facilities. To have a working platform height of 30 feet with slip resistant platform
and 44" railings. This unit would be electrically driven with controls at platform.
Justification I
With the added facilities, like the Community Center and Fire Station 3, there will always be a light burned out or some type ofmainlenance problem at heights
ladders cannot safely handle. We are looking at wall and ceiling heights of35 feet and very wide spans that only a scissor lift could handle .It can be used in all Fire
Stations, Community Center. Water Treatment Facility and Public Works Buildings. It also can be used for all types of maintenance issues and is defmitely needed
for maintenance personnel's safety.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
25,000
25,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
25,000
25,000
Total
j
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
Water Fund
2006
20,000
5,000
25,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
20,000
5,000
25,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
In the past, Facility Maintenance has had to rent one of these units. With the additions of the Community Center and Fire Station #3, there is a need ofa scissor lift
to make adjustments and/or repairs at heights a ladder won't safely reach. Since the availability of a lift with a rental company is always unknown, we most likely
would have to contract with someone to do the repair.
105
Capital Plan
I City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 15 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
Project #
06-42200-01
Project Name Rescue Trucks
Description
Purchase 2 rescue trucks for responding to emergency medical calls. These would be additions to the fleet
Justification
Currently the grass trucks are responding to all medical calls but are not equipped to handle all emergencies. Two smaller trucks designated and equipped strictly
for medical calls would be more efficient and economical. thus preserving the bigger grass rigs and extending their useful lives. Of the fire department responses.
approximately 60% of the calls are now medical related. With the medical gear currently stored on the grass trucks the equipment is always getting wet or damaged
by fIre type responses. The goal of having specifIc vehicle designed for medical responses will help to keep the appropriate equipment in the right locations always
available for medical calls. The proposed trucks will have fiberglass bodies with plenty of storage space so that we will also be able to store and transport hydraulic
rescue equipment on the vehicle as needed. The grass trucks will last us longer as they will be used strictly for wildfires and transportation of hose and equipment
from fire scenes. The medical gear and equipment will also be less likely to become contaminated by fue and have to be thrown away or cleaned before we have a
chance to use it All three stations have a higher rcentage ofrnedica1 res nses and it is im ortant that we have the appropriate vehicles to norm the job.
Expenditures
Vehicles
2006
35,000
35,000
2007
40,000
40,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
75,000
75,000
/
Total
Funding Sources
Equipmenl Bond
2006
35,000
35,000
2007
40,000
40,000 -
2008
2009
2010
Total
75,000
75,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The smaller trucks would be more efficient and economical and they would also extend the useful life of the grass rigs. By having a designated vehicle for medical
responses the fire department will be able to carry more of the appropriate medical equipment and not have to be concerned about contamination from grass fIfes or
other types offJ.re incidents that we may respond to. The "medical .. vehicles will also be kept in town and not in other cities as they may be now when called for
mutual aid assistance for wildfires.
106
Capital Plan
/ City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-42200-01
Project Name New Mobile Data Terminals in Fire Trucks
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 5-10 years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
Description
Installation of mobile data terminals (MDTs) in fire trucks.
Justification
By including MDTs in fire vehicles, firefighters will be able to access important data and information from the Anoka County Communications Center and fire
stations. As an example, known hazardous conditions will be identified while responding to the incident
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
2007
30,000
30,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
30,000
30,000
,
Total
/
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2007
30,000
30,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
. 30,000
30,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The installation ofMDTs will improve communications and data capabilities. The opportunity to view important information prior to arriving at the scene will make
the firefighters johs much safer.
/
107
Capital Plan
/ City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Ufe 20 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
Project #
07-42200-02
Project Name Water/Ice rescue boat
Description
A'small boat designed and built to perfonn water and ice rescues.
Justification
Andover does Dot currently have a rescue boat The boat would be used to perform ice and water rescues. The boat will make these specific types of rescues more
safe for all responders. The boat will allow firefighters to perform rescue work rather than waiting for a boat to arrive and perfonn recovery work.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
2007
20,000
20,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
20,000
20,000
Total
)
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2007
20,000
20,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
20,000
20,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Boat will make an easier and safer rescue for all responders and parties being rescued. The boat will save lives and make it safer for firefighters who have to enter
the water or crawl on the ice. The current method of having firefighters wear wet suits and try to swim or crawl on the ice to the victim is not very safe or
recommended ifwe can avoid it. The boat will help to get the rescuer and victim out of the situation faster and safer.
/
108
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 15 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
Project #
07-42200-03
Project Name Replacement - Hydraulic Rescue Equipment
Description
Replace one (and possibly two) hydraulic rescue tools used for extrication and heavy rescue work.
Justification
I
.
The current equipment is approximately 13 years old and is somewhat heavier than the new types of equipment The new hydraulic tools also have more capacity for
pushing, pulling, and cutting activities.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
2007
30,000
30,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
30,000
30,000
Total
/
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2007
30,000
30,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
30,000
30,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The hydraulic rescue equipment is necessary to provide the fastest and most efficient means to extricate trapped parties. The lighter weight and stronger tools will
make the rescue woIl< much less stressful for the fIrefIghters to perform.
'\
/
109
Capital Plan
/ City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Ufe 20 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Coutact Fire Chief
Department Fire
Projeet # 07-42200-04
Project Name Hose Washerffester
Description
The hose 'WaSher /tester can be used to wash hose as necessary and also to conduct the annual required hose tests.
Justification
The hose washer will save lime after the incident has ended in that the fll'efighters will be able to wash hose much faster after each incident The tester will be use to
conduct the annual hose testing where each section of hose is required to be tested to a certain pressure for a certain period of time. The tester will allow the fire
department to keep the pumpers in service instead of committing them for the testing process.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
2007
8.000
8,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
8,000
8,000
Total
J
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2007
8,000
8,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
8,000
8,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The new washer !tester will aid in making our jobs of getting the trucks back into service much easier after the fire events. The washer can dean hose much faster
than firefighters scrubbing hose with a hrush or broom The hose is required to be tested annnally, and with the proposed tester at least five sections can be tested at
on time instead of doing each section individually.
J
110
Capital Plan
./ City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
Project #
08-42200-01
Project Name Replacement - Fire Marshall Vehicle
Description
Replace Unit # 4801 - 1997 SIO Blazer with 48,992 miles. We may want to evaluate what type of vehicle we will need for this position at the time of replacement
Justification
The Fire Marshal's vehicle is anticipated to have approximately 70,000 miles on it by the year 2008. the scheduled replacement is between 2008 and 2010. The need
to respond on an emergency basis will a dependable vehicle needs to be considered. There have been more maintenance issues with this vehicle and although most
have been minor the occurrences are increasing and the costs will also start to increase as the vehicle gets older.
Expenditures
Vehicles
2006
2007
2008
30,000
30,000
2009
2010
Total
30,000
30,000
Total
/
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2007
2008
30,000
30,000
2009
2010
Total
30,000
30,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The new vehicle will be used for day to day inspections and also emergency responses when the Fire Marshal is available to assist at the incident including medical
calls. ]t is crucial that the Fire Marshals vehicle be up to date and in good operating order in order to perform all of the functions needed. This vehicle is also used to
help conduct all of the fire investigations in that the appropriate equipment needed is stored in the vehicle. The fIre department needs to have a very dependable
vehicle to oerform all of the functions listed.
"
/
111
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Usefnl Life 25 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
Project #
08-42200-02
Project Name Replacement - Fire Tanker #31
Description
Replace fIre tanker #31, a 1991 International I Alexis tanker with 6,288 miles.
Justification
Tanker#31 is one ofa number of major pieces of equipment that is scheduled for replacement between now and 2010. This vehicle will be sixteen years old in 2007
and will most certainly need a major refurbishment or replacement. Jt would be recommended to replace and sell the existing vehicle as is so that our fIre department
will benefit from new vehicle technology that should last us for the next twenty to twenty five years.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
2007
2008
295,000
295,000
2009
2010
Total
295,000
295,000
Total
I
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2007
2008
295,000
295,000
2009
2010
Total
295,000
295,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The new technology will allow firefighter to perform their jobs in a more efficient and safer manner. The newer technology will allow for just one operator to staff
the vehicle for water shuttles to and from the fire scenes. Currently we need at least two firefIghters to operate the tanker properly. The newer controls and gauges
will also help to make the vehicle much easier to pump water and dump water as needed.
)
112
Capital Plan
,. City of Andover, MN
Project # 09-42200-01
Project Name Replacement - Fire Engine..#ll
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 25 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
Description
Replace fire engine #11, a 1991 Pierce Lance pumper truck with 20,364 miles.
Justification
I
Engine # II and three other major pieces of equipment are scheduled to be replaced in 2010. In order to guarantee the replacement of all of these vehicles on or
before their scheduled replacement date, the replacement should be done as equipment bonding allows. The current engine is working fme but is starting to have
more day to day repairs needed. As with any vehicle that is 15 to 20 years old some parts can be harder to find and take longer to receive for needed repairs. The fire
department can not afford to have vehicles down for extended periods of time.
Expenditures
Vehicles
2006
2007
2008
2009
400,000 .
400,000
2010
Total
400,000
400,000
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2007
2008
2009
360,000
360,000
2010
Total
360,000
350,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
The new technology will allow firefighters to respond and conduct fire suppression activities, rescue operations, and other required. activities in a safer and more
efficient manner.
./
113
"
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010 .
Type Equipment
Useful Life 25 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
Project #
10-42200-01
Project Name Replacement - Ladder Truck #11
Description
Replace ladder truck #11, a 1991 Pierce 75' ladder truck with 14,260 miles. The current schedule has the truck being replaced in 201]; however, there are six fire
departroent vehicles scheduled for the same year. The intent is to balance the replacements over a period of time in order to make the project affordable. The new
ladder truck would be a 100 foot aerial platform, which includesa bucket at the end of the ladder forfrrefighter safety.
Justification
I
The current ladder truck is scheduled for 2011 and it is very important that we have this type of apparatus available for fire department use. The city is required to
by the I.S.O. to have this type ofvehicle available for use because of the huilding heights allowed in Andover. The new style, platform truck versus the current
straight ladder will be much safer for firefighter activities and fire suppression activities.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
850,01lO
850,000
Total
850,000
850,000
Total
/'
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
850,000
850,000
Total
850,000
850,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Tho use of an aerial devise can be very dangerous if not performed properly. A new platform truck will allow firefighter to perform the most dangerous of activities
as required form time to time, and know that they have the right piece of equipment to do the job. The larger and taller buildings now being built in Andover will
require this type of equipment The current ladder truck has been fairly dependable with not many major repairs needed It should be noted that the newest aerial
truck equipment and technologies are tenfold better than what we are now using. The new vehicle have safety sensors and weight distribution gauges thai will keep
operators from making mistakes while operating that could be very costly or dangerous. The newer buildings in Andover are getting taller with more green space
between the building and a hard surface making it much more difficult to reach some of them because of the height restrictions of the current ladder truck
114
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact Fire Chief
Department Fire
Project #
10-42200-02
Project Name Replacement - Fire Chiefs Vehicle
Description
Scheduled replacement of Fire Chiefs vehicle, a 2002 Tahoe with approximately 25,000.
Justification
I
The Fire Chiefs vehicle will be due for a scheduled replacement in 2010.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
40,000
40,000
Total
40,000
40,000
Total
-'
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
40,000
40,000
Total
40,000
40,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
In order to keep the fIrst line responding vehicles in the proper operating conditions in is important to have a scheduled replacement program for each. The Chiefs
current vehicle will be due and should be replaced when needed. The current vehicle has worked very well and should be evaluated for repairs and maintenance as
the replacement date gets doser.
/
115
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Park & Rec - Operations
Project #
06-45200-01
Project Name Replacement - Cushman Truckster #546
Description
Replace Unit #546, a 1994 Cushman Truekster 3,676 hours, with a similar type of vehicle. It is primarily used in the park system and hauling small items. The
Parks Department uses this vehicle an average of330 hourS per year to drag ball fields. After 12 years of service it should have approximately 4,000 hours on it and
a lot of time spent in the dirt
Justification
I
The vehicle being replaced is past the 10 year replacement period and maintenance costs are increasing.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
22,000
22,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
22,000
22,000
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
22,000
22,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
22,000
22,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Decrease maintenance costs and downtime.
J
116
I
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Park & Ree - Operations
Project #
06-45200-02
Project Name Replacement - I-ton Dump wi Snow Removal #511
Description
Replace Unit#51l, a 1995 F-350 with 69,178 miles, with a one ton pick-up with snow removal equipment This unit hauls materials and trailers to and from parks
in the summer months and removes snow in the winter months. The average miles per year is 7,000 which will be about 77,000 after 11 years of service.
Justification
I
Vehicle being replaced is past the 10 year replacement period and transmission repairs are increasing.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
60,000
60,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
60,000
60,000
\
Total
,
/
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
60,000
60,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
60,000
60,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Decrease maintenance costs and downtime.
117
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 06-45200-03
Project Name Lawn Sweeper
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Park & Rec - Operations
Description I
Purchase a pull-type lawn sweeper 72 inches in width with a 7 yard hopper. This unit will primarily be used for spring and fall clean up of the City Hall complex
and City parks. Having an additional sweeper larger that the current one will be much more productive to clean up litter and leaves in the parks system.
Justification
I
A wider unit will increase productivity and can be pulled by equipment already owned.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
30,000
30,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
30,000
30,000
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
30,000
30,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
30,000
30,000
Total
I Oporn"oo~Im_
/
118
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 06-45200-05
Project Name Broom Attachment
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 15 Years
Category Park Improvements
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Park. & Rec - Operations
Description I
Purchase an additional broom to help clean the side walks at city hall, community center and around public works.
Justification I
We are presently using Park's broom when they are not using i~ however, with the opening of the community center an additional unit will be needed since the
Park's crew is usually using it during the day to clean the ice rinks.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
5,500
5,500
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
5,500
5,500
Total
/
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
5,500
5,500
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
5,500
Total
5,500
Operational Impact/Other I
A broom could be attached to the Water Departments Tool Cat which already has a cab mounted on it This would allow more usage of an existing piece of
equipment.
./
119
Capital Plan
I City of Andover, MN
Projoct# 07-45200-01
Project Name Replacement - Self-Propelled 48" Sweeper
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 15 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Park & Rec - Operations
Description
This machine would replace unit #542. a 1988 sweeper. This machine is smaller than the pull type and can get into smaller places.
Justification
The current machine is 17 years old and has a lot of hours on it The current machine still works and runs but it is costing us more and more each year as a front
line unit
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
2007
20,000
20,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
20,000
20,000
\
/
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2007
20,000
20,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
20,000
20,000
Total
Operational Impact'Other I
A more cost efficient machine with less breakdowns
\
/
120
Capital Plan
I City of Andover, MN
Project # 06-45201-04
Project Name Oakview Park
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 20 Years
Category Improvements
Priority 1 - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Park & Ree - Projects
Description
Install playground equipment for 2 - 5 and 5 - 12 year olds. The park was dedicated to the City a couple of years ago but no improvements have been made to the
park as of yet
Justification
To provide play options for the youth.
This project has been recommended by the Park & Recreation Conunission.
Expenditures
Construction
2006
50,000
50,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
50,000
50,000
Total
,
/
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Funds
2006
50,000
5O,ODO
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
50,000
50,000
Total
I Opornti,"'" Imp-
,
)
121
/
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 07-41910-01
Project Name Replacement - Ford Taurus #15
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact Comm. Dev. Director
Department Planning & Zoning
Description
Replace Unit #15, a 1995 Taurus with 60,293 miles. Planning and Zoning averages 5,000 to 7,000 miles a year on this unit, so after this year it will have 65,000-
67,000 miles on it By the end of the year, this would make an excellent intern vehicle or city vehicle to be used for seminar/school transportation.
Justification
I
By year 2006, this vehicle will have 65,000 miles on it This vehicle could be used as an intern vehicle or for city employees attending seminars/training.
Expenditures
I Equipment
2006
2007
20,000
20,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
20,000
20,000
"
,
/
Total
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2007
20,000
20,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
20,000
20,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Will decrease maintenance costs and improve productivity. This car could be kept and used for interns and possibly replace an older unit
/
122
Capital Plan
/ City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Storm Sewer
Project #
06-43150-01
Project Name Replacement - Street Sweeper #171
Description
Replace Unit # 171, a 1995 Tymco Street Sweeper with 32,000 miles. This unit averages 3,600 miles and 400 hours a year. By 2006, it should have approximately
36,000 miles on it and 4,000 hours of service.
Justification
I
The vehiCle is past the 10 year replacement period and maintenance costs are increasing. The truck chassis has very low miles on it however we can probably save
some money by refurbishing the hopper on the unit This would save us $50,000 to $75,000.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
150,000
150,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
150,000
Total
150,000
.I
Funding Sources'
Capital Projects Levy
Equipment Bond
2006
50,000
100,000
150,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
50,000
100,000
150,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other
I
.
Decrease maintenance costs and downtime.
)
123
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority 2 - Medium
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Street Signs
Project # 07-43170-01
Project Name Replacement - Sign Truck #410
Description
Replace Unit #410, a 1995 F350 sign truck chassis with an enclosed box and 64,095 miles. This unit averages 6,400 miles per year and does spend a fair amount of
time idling at the job site while the hydraulics are being used to install or remove sign posts. At the end of its cycle, it will have approximately 75,000 miles on it.
Justification
Vehicle is at the 10 year replacement period and needs to be replaced with a vehicle that would better meet the needs of the sign department
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
2007
75,000
75,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
75,000
75,000
Total
/
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2007
75,000
75,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
75,000
75,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Provide improved and safer production for the sign department while transporting and installing/removing equipment (signs). A better designed truck that can cany
more equipment and is better equipped to be a sign vehicle.
/
124
Capital Plan
J City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Project # 06-43100-09
Project Name Dump Truck wI Snow Removal
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Streets I Highways
I~
Description I
Purchase a single axle dump truck with snow removal equipment We would like this truck to be equipped with a roll-offstyle box and to purchase a separate roll-
off flat bed to mount the hot patcher too. This will be an addition to the fleet
Justification I
With all the development occurring in the city, an additional plow truck is needed to keep up with the snow plowing routes. The roll-off design will enable us to use
the truck for more than just hauling dirt and snow plowing but hauling equipment or other types of containers.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
190,000
190,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
190,000
190,000
,
Total
J
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
190,000
190,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
190,000
190,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
More useage of equipment
/
125
Capital Plan
/ City of Andover, MN
Project # 06-43100-10
Project Name Replacement - Tree Chipper #509
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Streets I Highways
Description
Replace unit #509, a 1998 tree chipper with 553 hours, with a similar unit owned exclusively by the City. We currently share the existing chipper with the City of
Ham Lake.
Justification
I
With the growing need in the City, staff could be more productive and efficient with many projects if the City owned its own chipper. Many times when we need to
use it Ham Lake has it and when they need it, we are using it
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
40,000
40,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
40,000
40,000
Total
/
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
40,000
40,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
40,000
40,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
This unit belongs 50% to Ham Lake. Better use of time and man power. The cost to Andover would $20,000.00.
126
,
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
/
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Streets I Highways
Project # 07-43100-01
Project Name Replacement - Dump Truck wI Snow Removal #197
Description
Replace Unit #197. a 1996 LT9000 with 48,900 miles. with a tandem axle dump truck with snow removal equipment This unit averages about 6,000 miles a year
snow plowing and hauling materials. After II years it should have approximately 60,000 miles on it
Justification
The vehicle being replaced is at the 10 year replacement period.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
2007
200,000
200,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
200,000
200,000
Total
/
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2007
200,000
200,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
200,000
200,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Reduction of maintenance costs.
J
127
\
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
)
Project # 07-43100-02
Project Name Self contained spray patcher
Type Equipment
Useful Life 15 Years
Category StreetslHighways
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Streets I Highways
Description I
This is a self contained unit that takes one person to run. It carries the rock and heated emulsion on board and sprays it in the pot hole in front of the truck. The
operator never leaves the safety of the truck and never has to deal with the mess or the weather elements.
Justification I
We have an old pull type machine that is a 1994 out back. the issues that we have with the machine is more ofa safety concern. Yau are working behind the trailer
with your back to oncoming traffic and sometimes near the center of the road This type of repair lasts the longest and now it can be done with just one person from
the safety of the truck.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
2007
150,000
150,00D
2008
2009
2010
Total
150,000
150,00D
Total
;
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2007
150,000
150,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
150,000
150,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Patching pothotes can be done with just one person and it can be done in a safer environment
128
I
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
,
Type Equipment
Uscful Lifc 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Streets I Highways
Project # 07-43100-03
Project Name Replacement - Dump Truck wI Snow Removal #195
Description
Replace Unit #195, a 1995 LT9000 with 54,210 miles, with a tandem axle dump truck with snow removal equipment The Streets Departroent snow plows and
hauls materials approximately 6,000 miles a year with this vehicle. After 12 years of service it will have about 70,000 miles on it
Justification
This vehicle is past the 10 year replacement period and maintenance costs are increasing.
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
2007
200,000
200,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
200,000
200,000
Total
Funding Sources
Eq uipment Bond
2006
2007
200,000
200,000
2008
2009
2010
Total
200,000
200,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Decrease maintenance and downtime.
129
'\
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
Project # 08-43100-01
Project Name Replacement - Hot Asphalt Box
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Useful Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Coutaet PW Superintendent
Department Streets I Highways
Description
This unit was donated to the City in 1998 by the Lions Club and is now creating high maintenance and cost issues.
Justification
This unit will be 10 years old and due for replacement
Expenditures
Equipment
2006
2007
Total
2008
40,000
40,000
2009
2010
Total
40,000
40,000
Funding Sources
Equipment Bond
2006
2007
Total
2008
40,000
40,000
2009
2010
Total
40,000
40,000
Operational Impact/Other I
There is a large savings in asphalt materials by being able to keep asphalt warm and not having to dwnp materials that went cold. This would eliminate waste.
I
/
130
\
Capital Plan
City of Andover, MN
2006 thru 2010
Type Equipment
Usefn] Life 10 Years
Category Equipment
Priority I - High
Contact PW Superintendent
Department Water
Project # 06-49400-01
Project Name Replacement - I-ton Van #67
Description
Replace Unit #67. a 19% one ton van with 74,924 miles. with a one-ton truck that includes -3 utility box and hoist This unit averages 8,500 miles a year and at the
end of the cycle it should have approximately 85,000 miles on it.
Justification
I
Expenditures
Vehicles
2006
40,000
40,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
40,000
40,000
Total
/
Funding Sources
Water Fund
2006
40,000
40,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
Total
40,000
40,000
Total
Operational Impact/Other I
Keep maintenance costs low and trade while it still has a trade in value. The Water Department would like to up grade to a 4 wheel drive pickup with a utility box
to make better use of a vehicle to maintain the water system.
/
131
APPENDIX
\
)
. ,
/
v_
InlIatiaoFector
J AverageUse(lJdonspefuserpel
Aa..-
New Connec:liona
--
T"_
""'.
.... .n
u.e....
Connection Charge
NUCt..ge
ConnedioofA/Q
......,.
u.e Ralo
"""
3.00%
40,983
"
200
300
4,7.012
'.30
1.14
1,840
1....
"'"
3.00%
37,163
"
200
280
<.""
7.61
''''
1,967
1.821
...
'"
5%
"""
.......
"..
aTY OF ANDOVER
W__~F1nanclaIPrajections
3.00%
37,163
"
200
200
5,190
,llS
'"
....
1.967
.%
5%
5%
Dtirnate
2005
3.00%
37,163
"
200
200
s,_no
8.45
1.32
2,318
~12<
'"
'"
'"
2006
3.00%
37,163
SO
ISO
'SO
5.8211
8.B7
1.39
~503
2.29<
.%
5%
5%
300%
37,163
SO
ISO
ISO
5.770
949
'.49
~'04
2,4n
...
'"
'"
2.'"
3.00%
37,163
SO
'SO
ISO
5.920
10.18
1.59
~920
~"5
...
'"
'"
2008
3.00%
37,163
35
'00
'00
'.020
10.87
1,70
3,153
~89ll
...
'"
'"
"""
F~t
"'''
3.00%
':$1,163
35
100
100
5.22ll
12.21
1,91
3,678
3.370
'"
5%
'"
2011
3.00%
37,163
35
'00
'00
'.320
1<82
:<01
3,9n
3.....
...
5%
5%
"'''
"'13
"'''
3.00%
37,163
35
'00
"",
5.""
3.00%
37,163
35
100
100
5.8211
3.00%
37,163
35
'00
100
6,120
11.63
1.82
3,4a;;
3,121
...
'"
'"
3.00%
37,163
35
100
100
6,420
13.46
2.11
<.290
3,931
...
'"
'"
14.14
:<21
<.633
4,246
...
5%
5%
14.84
232
5.00<
<.585
.%
5%
5%
--
.......
PermlF_
Penalties
,........
Xferl...
""'"'
T..
"-
Opooatio>o
--
~Oullly
R~Reserv.
T..
""-
"""""............
CumulatMI baIsM:e
Connedion Charges
AlqCNIrges
,_
Sped" Aae8smenl:
R~ReselV.
"""'
T..
I
"-
--
CapltaOul.,.
Xl....
T..
""-
.............-
""-
1,041,001
38,356
13,900
16,806
"4,336
326
1,224,725
1,688,326
1,056,666
40,343
14,000
16,977
4",352
".
1,539,534
872.'"
815,673
363.000
1526,519
1,337,130
28.""
'.350
25.'"
(93.195)
505,170
1,811,773
....962
253.557
350,000
l,7S2.485
1,521,731
48,818
13350
14,606
~,..
739,438
127.988
2,468,719
974,455
458,030
434,llOlI
2,177,219
1.212,917
411.000
10,000
,~OOO
25.000
=....
<.000
1,537,603
993,752
7-49,457
1,046,817
741,393
100,000
1,494,039
40,000
10,000
1~000
25,000
167,424
<.000
1,752,463
1,117,449
746,720
105,000
1,969,169
1,640,1BD
411.000
10,000
1~000
25.000
82.'"
<.000
1,823,825
1,150,972
745,663
SO.OOO
1.946,635
1,784,638
411.000
10,000
"000
25.000
100,056
<.000
1,975,694
1,185,502
,...=
57.500
1,991,230
1,941,283
""OLIO
10,000
I~ooo
25.000
7~'"
<.000
2,105,186
1,221,067
749,439
55,000
2,025,506
2,071.653
40,000
10,llOlI
"000
25.000
78,714
<.000
2,241,367
1,257,699
754,221
60.000
100,000
2,161,920
2,210,208
411.000
10,000
1~000
25.000
85,011
<.000
2,386,2151
1,295,430
7!i1,5lJ7
55.000
100,000
2,207,937
2,357,438
40,000
10,000
1~000
25,000
81,812
<.000
2,540,25D
1,334,293
759,440
55,000
100,000
2,248,733
2,513,866
411.000
10,000
1~000
25.000
99.1!i1
<.000
2,704,1l23
1,374,321
759....
00.000
100,000
2,294,285
2,680,044
411.000
10,000
'~OOO
25.000
107,090
<.000
2,878,134
1,415,551
759,034
00.000
100,000
2,334,585
(463,601)
1JKlO,721
13,015
211.288
1,888,210
"'.500
(350,607)
(216,706)
(122,810)
(15,538)
79....
79,448
178,282
291,518
_.738
543,549
1,527,120
1.540,135
1,569,423
1,860,923
1,510,316
1,293,610
1,170,799
1,155,261
1,234,924
1,314,371
1,492,653
1,784,171
2,193,909
2.737,458
4!i1,J.t6
5,982
90,212
278.000
781,540
1,456387
931,718
88,219
73,45lJ
363.000
1,960,065
7'J1,ff79
1,335,347
955,710
1,061,610
<06.535
123,864
45,000
59,900
529,399
4';31.977
133,n4
571,751
315,344
101,133
416,476
340,571
'''''=
449,795
367,817
117,961
100,000
5B5,n8
397 ~.,
127,398
100,000
624,640
429,022
137,590
"".=
148,597
SOD,411
160,485
100,000
760,896
12,108
32.283
44,391
"".830
213,878
...".
SO....
505,170
1,450,403
45,3:28
766,758
350.000
SO,11e
".'"
434,000
1~'"
1,sn,507
1,105,000
=....
1,338,686
170250
167,424
337,674
366.500
82.'"
459,145
120,500
100,056
22ll.5S6
284,210
7ll9.ooo
72....
1,156,093
""".
150,000
78,714
512,924
284,210
1SO,OOO
85,011
519,221
100,000
100,000
284,210
150,000
107,090
541,300
760,608
"'''''
3ll9,168
739,438
1,601,858
666,612
711,941
284,210
150,000
91,812
526,022
284,210
150.000
99.157
533.397
219,596
737,149 l595,n9 509,662 275,649 (Zr7,CJ7e) 191,725 112.606 195,920 (706,298) 72,854 105,420 140,590 178,574
(124,893)
612,258 1,308,035 1,817,897 2.lIn,346 1,616.270 2.007,995 2,120,601 2.315,521 1,510.223 1,883,077 1,788,497 1,929,087 2,107,661
2,3'Zl,2S7
~__.fi
Pillea Urit Pumpng Syslom
._-
TN"
New DeYeklpmert Pro;ect8
TransmisllionUne-lvtO:Net
143rdWatennainI"'P"OIIMnentS
12"wateflne~SouItlCl;
Plo~
PairCwater'-
2,..;01'1 glIIIon sIonIge tank
St6fac:eSealBridl;S\ruelures
Domo_
-
'MIter SeaIrtty System lmprovemem.
EledJicScissorUft
GPS
TrudtReplac:ement
VWlReplacement
T""
FundedbyOperatioM
Fundedbylnfrastna:tunWTrunk
Fundedbydebl:
T""
T~
AADS
Cumul..w. OS
\
""'""'os
Wl1'
215,000
225.000
411.000
165,000
500.000
1,205,000
170~
5.000
55,000
40,000
275,250
40,000
108,000
15,000
5.000
5.000
416,500 3,128,000
45,000 45,000
175,500 120,500
83.000
2,950,000
'.500
5,000 5,000
854,000
SO.ooo
124,000
500.000
175,000
5.000
200,000
SO.ooo
150,000
205,000
55,000
150,000
55,000 60,000
150,000 1SO,000
205,000 210,000
00,000
150,000
210,000
100,000
1,105,000
1,205,000
105,000
170~
275,250
SO,OOO 57,500
366,500 120,500
2.950,000
416,500 3,128,000
55,000
799,000
854,000
200.000
SO.OOO
150,000
55,000
1SO,OOO
55,000 60,000
150,000 150,000
205,000 210,000
00.000
150,000
210,000
205000
I.
o
10
739,438
10
741.393
,.
746,720
10
745,663
132
10
"
284,210
".".
284,210
749,439
"
284,210
"'.22'
"
284,210
757,507
"
"
284,210
284,210
759,440
759,954
"
"
264,210
759,0J4
CITY OF ANDOVER
Sewer System Financial Projections
A_I EstI..... Forecast
Voar 2003 21>D( 200' 2006 2007 2008 20" 2010 21>11 2012 2013 21>14
Inflation Factor - expenses 3.00% 3._ ,.- '.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3._ 3._ 3.DO% 3._ 3._ 3.00%
Acres Added 65 65 SO 50 SO 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
New COnnections 200 200 ISO 'SO ISO 100 100 '00 '00 '00 '00 '00
New Cu:slOmel'$ 200 200 ISO ISO ISO '00 '00 100 100 100 '00 '00
Total Customers 6,017 6.29' 6,426 6,576 6.725 ..826 ..926 7.026 7,126 7;226 7.326 7,426
Rales
Base Rate 46.00 47.84 49.75 51.74 53.81 55.95 5820 SO.53 62.95 65.47 ..... 70.81
Use Rate
Connectioo Cha<ge 341 351 36' 372 387 402 .,S .35 '52 .70 48" 5..
Area Char;e ,= 1,302 '.340 1,379 1,434 1.491 1,551 1,613 1,678 1,745 1,815 1,888
Connecliorv'Area "" "" "" 3% .% .% .% .% .% .% .% .%
Base Rate 3% .% .% .% .% .% .% .% .% .% .% .%
Use Rata "'" "'" 3% "" 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Base Use 1,287,168 1,338,825 1,354,300 1,360,969 1,447,704 1,527,932 1,612,373 1,701,135 1,794,327 1,892,345 1,995,309 2,103,340
- 22,416 18,91. 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20,000 21>,000 21>.000 20,000
Interest (1,416) 4,016 20.000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20.000 20.000 20,000 20,000 20.000 20.000
""'~ 7.= ',700
Total 1,308,168 1,369,282 1.399,000 1.400,969 1,487,704 1,567,932 1,652,373 1,741,135 1 ,834,327 1 ,932,345 2,035,309 2,143,340
Expenses
Oper.mono 986,413 988,704 1,245,157 1,259,647 1,297,436 1,336,360 1,376,450 1,417,744- 1,460,276 1,504,084- 1,549,207 1,595,683
DebtSeIVice 410,873 7.000
Capilal OuUay 7r.5OO 5.000 3,500
ReplacetnenlReser.oe 390.000 400.000 300.000 300.000 300.000 300.000 300,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 400,000
TDIal 1,787.286 1,395,704 1,322,657 1,564..647 1,597,436 1,639,860 1,676,450 1,717,744- 1,810,276 1,854,084 1,899,207 1,995,683
Balance
Annual SUrpNsIOefidl: (479,118) (26,422) 76,343 (163,676) (109,732) (7'.928) (24.077) 23,391 24,051 78,261 136,102 147,657
FB 12131/2000
Balanoe 1,268,468 1,242,048 1,318,389 1,154,711 1,()4.4,979 973,051 948,974 972,365 996,416 1,074,sn 1.210.179 1,358,435
Ilnf~structurelTrunk 1;::~:?-'trr;;:T'"~:T::T::r;;:i::h<}L;L;t~~S;:::1;:;~::~i1:rr:T:;::;;~=:r;~~;;;::Li?:~~~G'l:;7;:Z;Z:~:::ZS0,::;:Li;::'23Z~:j:k;:;;;'::;Ji;JL.it;'d;;:,,;,;~{r:::r.:~]
.........
Connection ChMges 246,n3 385,173 393,197 55,800 58,050 40.200 41,800 43,500 46;100 47,000 48,900 50,900
""'" CIwges ".950 71,700 52.'85 64,2ll5 ".455 58,730 61,075 63.525 ".080
Interest 34,135 39,185 20,000 20.000 20.000 20,000 20,000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20,000 20.000
Replacement Reserve 390,000 400,000 300.000 300,000 300.000 300.000 300.000 350.000 350,000 350.000 400,000
Special As5essments 331,507 16,959 47,812
""'" 72:228
TDIal 1,002,415 913,.545 461,009 ..... 7SO 449,750 412,385 416,085 419,955 473,930 478,075 482,425 536,980
Expen...
DebtSeI'Yic:e 127,957 463,254 89.358 89,358 202.85" 202.95" 274,768 274,768
CaplalOullay 144,3n 207,904 515,000 523.900 175,500 120,500 124,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
TDIal 272,334 671,158 515,000 523,900 175,500 120,500 213,358 239,358 352,959 352,959 424,768 424,768
I
Balance
AmualSurpluslDeficil: 730,081 242,387 (53,991) (79.'50) 274,250 291,885 202.= 180,597 120,971 125,116 57,657 112,212
Fa 1213112000
IlaIanao 741,739 984,125 930,135 850.985 1,125,235 1,417,120 1.619,84-7 1,800,44.4 1,921,415 2,048,531 2.104.188 2.216,400
ICapital Projects !0I:8-=3]1:;;-Tzt""LJ~:~:;::JI;ri;j~;~LLiTI'?;2'7%"'~~,~'T.':I-:::::;=~::f'7Z[I!'8~,n:TI'Li1iTI2ZT:~Zm3:ii.~:;~u13;:=;:;'1:::::-<Ii?r2~;:Z7;;:;r::~~~'ZS.:ZSZfG.:=~:::4
Infrastructure
New ""'"-_
Sanitary Sewer Service study
un station #4 Maintenance
Crosstown Btvd Trunk
Yellow Pi'le un Station
Suface Seal an Brick. Structures
By-Pass un Station
150th Lane Tnmk
Equipmen.
GPS
Flow M.,..
Truck Replacement
UiseEquipment
TDIal
165,000 170.250 175,500 120,500 124,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
350.000 353.650
800.000
3.500
800.000
271;100 554,492
5,000
15,000
55,000
7.500
592,500 528,900 175,500 724,000 124,000 1,O'll,200 150,000 704,492 150,000 150,000
71.500 5.000 3.500
515,000 523,900 175,500 120,500 124,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
800.000 871.200 554,492
592,500 528,900 175,500 724,000 124,000 1,027.zoo 150,000 704,492 150,000 150,000
Fund&d by OpefaUons
Funded by InfrastructurelTrunk
Funded by debt
IDebt
lnterestRate
Te~
OS Annuanzed
Total Annual Debt Service
Cl2Jl;:;:r;:/?:'z::":r:JT"7:)J::;:~:~,/S:;_L~2::c::;2srC'j;Z'lIJ=::::.l':1~SZ1~:;:C:;~7JJm~::r:rRi~:;1:2JJ:i;,""L~:7;~2::::::3;,72~:::::r;l:28':;::;=:;:D2~~::id
5.00% 5.0~ 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
77,703 113,601 71,809
89,358 89,358 202,959 202,959 274,768 274,768
/
133
CITY OF ANDOVER
Park Improvement Fund
Projected Fund Balance
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 TOTAtS
Projected Sources of Revenue
Park Dedication Fee $2,325 per unit
platted units 150 100 50 50 50 50
Anticipated Park. Dedication Fee $ 348,750 $ 232,500 $ 116,250 $ 116,250 $ 116,250 $ 116,250 $ 1,046,250
DNR Grant 20.000 20,000
Capital Projects levy ~ Park Improvements 52.800 52,BOO 52,800 52,BOO 52,800 52,800 316,800
Total Revenues Available 401,550 285,300 189,050 169,050 169,050 169,050 1,383,050
Projected Commitments
Annual Miscenaneous Projects 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000
Andover CorM'lunity Center Contribution 96,144 96,144
Lunds North Park 60,000 60,000
Country Oaks West Park 100,000 100,000
Prairie Knoll Park 265,000 35,000 150.000 450,000
Woodland Estates 4th 15,000 15,000
Fox Meadaws Park 10,000 10,000
Oakview Park 50.000 50,000
Terrace Park 55.000 55,000
Crooked lake Boat landing 125,000 125,000
Forest Meadows Park 25,000 25,000
Strootman Park 100,000 100,000
Andover Uons Park 85,000 85,000
Hawkridge Park 500,000 500,000
Total Commitments 546,144 135,000 205,000 150,000 260,000 525,000 1,821,144
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (144,594) 150,300 (15,950) 19,050 (90,950) (355,950)
Fund Balance as of December 31,2004 185,600 .
Fund Balance Brought Forward 41,006 191,306 175,356 194,_ 103,456
Ending Fund Balance * $ 41,006 $ 191,306 $ 175,356 $ 194,406 $ 103,456 $ (252,494)
*Target. 10% of current years commitments to create a contingency for any project overages.
)
134
CllY OF ANDOVER
Road & Bridge Funds - Total
Projected Fund Balance
J
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Projected Sources of Revenue
Est Annual MSA Construction Allocation $ 1,297,615 $ 798,277 $ 522,145 $ 517,145 $ 512,145 $ SD2,145
2001 State Aid Road Bond Pymt - Principal (135,000) (140,000) (1SD.000) (155,000) (160,000) (170.000)
Available MSA Construction
for Other Commitments 1,162,615 658,277 372,145 362,145 352,145 332,145
Est Annual Maintenance Allocation 288,062 288,062 288,062 288,062 288,062 288,062
2001 State Aid Road Bond Pymt - Interest (102,082) (96,958) (91,298) (85,120) (78,583) (71,568)
General Fund Commitment (164,800) (169,744) (174,836) (180,081) (185.484) (191,048)
Available MSA Maintenance
for Other Commitments 21,180 21,380 21,928 22,861 23,995 25,446
Total MSA Available for other
Commibnents 1,183,795 679,637 394,073 385,006 376,140 357,591
Federal Funds 270,000 825,000
Assessments* 1,807,200 554,704 389.014 362,235 229,102 112.362
Tax Levy 725,899 782,066 800,689 828,964 858,811 890,329
Total Revenues Available 3,716,894 2,286,407 1,583,776 1,576,205 2,289,053 1,360,282
Projected Commitments
MSA Routes - New & Reconstruct 208,000 1,529,400 859,150 2,608,000
County Intersection Upgrades 510,000 600,000 400,000
Signaf Upgrades 20,000
Pedesbian Trail Maintenance 46,000 47,000 48,000 49,000 SD,ooo 51,000
R & B - Pavement Markings 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000
R & B - Seal Coating 134,455 233.889 196.277 454,349 392,762 308.421
/ R & B - Crack Sealing 107,051 91,008 188,518 161,982 115,690 117,556
R & B - Overlays 626,560 736,454 1,027,052 967,705 835,228 740,138
Total Commitments 1,645,066 3,271,751 1,474,847 2,908,186 4,018,680 1,235,115
Revenues Over (Under) ExpendibJres 2,071,828 (985,344) 108,929 (1,331,981) (1,729,627) 125,167
Fund Balance as of December 31,2004 2,108,697
Fund Balance Brought Forward 4,180.525 3,195,181 3,304,110 3,304,110 1,574,483
Ending Fund Balance $ 4,180,525 $ 3,195,181 $ 3,304,110 $ 1,972,128 $ 1,574,483 $ 1,699,649
.. Assuming collected in same year
135
/
CITY OF ANDOVER
Trail Fund
Projected Fund Balance
2005
Projected Sources of Revenue
Trail Fee $565 per unit
platted units
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
TOTALS
150
150
100
100
100
Trail Fee
$ 62,664
$ 84,750
$ 84,750
$ 56,500
$ 56,500
$ 56,500
$ 401,664
Total Revenues Available 62,664 84,750 84,750 55,SOO 56,500 56,500 401,664
Projected Commitments
North side 0( Crosstown Blvd - Hamilton Sq. to Avocet Sf 30,000 30,000
Hanson Blvd -155th lane to 159thAve (04-46) 80,000 80,000
East stde of Crosstown Blvd - 139th Ave to 141st lane 30,000 30,000
North side of Bunker Lake Blvd - Hansen Blvd to Crane St 30.000 30,000
Station Parkway - Thrush Sf to Jay St 60,000 60,000
North Side of Crosstown Blvd - Nightingale St to Hanson Blvd 100,000 100,000
157th Ave - Prairie Rd to Kumquat St 230,000 230,000
West side of Crosstown Blvd - South Coon Creek to Andover Blvd 75,000 75,000
Total Commitments 110,000 60,000 60,000 100,000 230,000 75,000 $ 635,000
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (47,336) 24,750 24,750 (43,500) (173,500) (18,500)
Furd Balance as of December 31, 2004 176,336
Furd Balance Brought Forward 129,000 153,750 178,500 178,500 5,000
Ending Fund Balance t $ 129,000 $ 153,750 S 178,500 $ 135,000 $ 5,000 S (13,500)
'"Target - 10% of current years convnibnents to create a contingency for any project overages.
... It Is anticipated that all projects will not be fuRy expended by the end of the year, and fubJre projects will be contingent on additional revenues.
136
(!)
~NDbVE~
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: David D. Berkowitz, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Update of Hanson Boulevard NW & Bunker Lake Boulevard NW
Improvements/04-23 - Engineering
DATE: September 27,2005
INTRODUCTION
The City Council will be given an update on the Hanson Boulevard NW & Bunker Lake Boulevard
NW Improvements.
DISCUSSION
The City Council is requested to discuss the 2006 Hanson Boulevard NW & Bunker Lake Boulevard
NW Improvements. The 2006 Hanson Boulevard NW & Bunker Lake Boulevard NW
Improvements project layout will be presented at the meeting for discussion.
ACTION REQUIRED
No action required at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
Q~cu . ~.~~j1~ - - ~ '/-
David D. Berkowitz ~
~NDbVE~
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Supplemental Agenda Items for September 27,2005,2005 City Council
Workshop
DATE: September 27,2005
The City Council is requested to review the supplemental material for the following Agenda Items:
Accept Additional Information under Discussion Items
Item #4. Discuss Rural Reserve Planning (Supplemental) - Planning
/
'--
m ickinson
Cl Administrator
Rural Reserve- Collecter Streets and Entrance@
-==~~
r--W ---1
\&
J II L._
J\
'--I
\n
i" 1\
II I
Ih
. ~c-~~[[
~ - t~bi
A-=Fi I
/V
~
r--
~fr~
"'"' r ~~
'" j------
-
-
-/
n r '*1
I I
- \ I "--I ~.
>- / L I
J ~
VI
~I / / D
c-~N ~
r- 77Q I
'"'~
\
\......
r--
-
-
I j
~
j
~J r '\
: .....>r ~= n
.
..... -U '
.. /7/! /
'. //.
'~
~
;>= 1= ~
~~I I /~
~~//;/s ~ ~
~ \w.p:mrnq \\ IIIII1II III1II
t- =--- -;::-.- -1HlliT 1-1111111 I
'--
IIII ..J~t~""
I.Y-:!:l::!:: v
Vl1 J..>- ):: -
~ ~ I
d r=-
11=- f=f- IL I
.LL I Ul..u f.. J J-II-l
ttO~~
-<; '--12:C\\J I I , I I I
<I LU II I 1IIIII1
~II~~
III I
m~r\
/ ..- i~mSJ
I --..... 1rr \ \\\/Tlrm\\
"" =~
,~
.
~....,
/1 ~_:"""..
f. 'T-~
~r""'-~' 1-
L L
rrrTr ~
Ilw In~~)-)::;c
Legend
.
...... Collector Streets
.. Entrances
'--
September 27,2005
q-d J(}S' t.!Oi(/1 t. / L...
Page 1 of2
tJo~"-.s ill) P
James Dickinson
From: Darren B. Lazan [darren.lazan@landformmsp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 200S. 3:03 PM
To: Dave Berkowitz
Cc: James Dickinson; jkrow@fwhlaw.com; Martin, Sara
Subject: Hanson Boulevard Improvements
)ave
~s follow-up to our conversations last week, I am writing to express my concern over the current construction
:iocuments and construction activity on Hanson Boulevard adjacent to my properties.
~s you are aware, earlier this year I signed an agreement waiving my rights to appeal an assessment for the much
:iiscussed improvements to that section of roadway. This was in support of our request that the City of Andover make
::ertain improvements as outlined in the Feasibility Study prepared by you and submitted for our review. Waiver of mv
:ights to appeal are absolutely subiect to the terms outlined in that studvas it was the basis of the discussion, and the
Jnly information we had to rely on in our decision to waive those rights.
Subsequent to that agreement, It is my understanding that the City of Andover has entered, or intends to enter into, a
Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with Anoka County to construct the actual improvements outlined in the feasibility study.
A.fter several requests for a review of those plans prior to approval we were supplied Final Plans on September 7th,
2005 a few days prior to the start of Construction.
In reviewing these plans, and observing construction over the last couple weeks I have several significant concerns as it
relates to this project;
1. The construction began at a point further south than the original plans contemplated and has added considerable
length to the roadway being removed and replaced.
2. The agreed to point where our responsibility ends, and the County project begins has moved north a substantial
distance, again adding considerably to the costs associated with our share of the project. This point was a
negotiated item prior to our agreement and was previously located well south of the Clinic's North property line,
and now falls well North of that same property line.
3. It appears that the County has added another entire traffic lane to the plan adding considerable cost to the
project. This was clearly never part of the plan and should not be included in our part of the project. If the County
now believes additional capacity is required north of our property they need to delineate that as part of their
project.
4. There are several construction means and methods I remain concerned about that have considerable impact on
project cost. Some of these were contemplated in the Feasibility study, some not. I would like to meet with you to
go over these in detail so I m comfortable we are equitably dividing the costs.
As you know, the equitable distribution of costs in a combined project has been the single biggest concern I had going
into this project. I remain very concerned that the County has chosen unilaterally to add to this project and now we are
in a position of hashing out the effects of their decision. If the City has, or intends to enter into a Joint Powers
Agreement (JPA) with the County that departs from the Feasibility Study which was the basis for our agreement, it is my
opinion they do so at their own risk of additional cost. Since Anoka County has chosen to begin construction, to the
extent it departs from our agreement I believe they have done so at their fisk of additional costs.
Dave, I am writing because I know this has been a very contentious project and I do not want to be working through
these issues "after the fact", but it appears this is the road down which we are headed. Please review these issues with
the Council and let me know where we are at on this matter and subsequent agreements.
9/27/2005
Page 2 of2
\espectfully,
)arren B. Lazan, RLA, ASLA
::EO, Principal Designer
510 First Avenue North, Suite 650
vlinneapolis, MN 55403
Jffice: 612.252.9070 ext. 135
)irect: 612.638.0250
:;ell: 612.221.8143
=ax: 612.252.9077
~~~~
~
LANDFOfu"VI
!llti"N. !Af'OU!..~ "IlQE,-"U:
Corporate Commercial. Commercial & Campus Design. Urban Design. Residential. Design Build
~OTICE: All drawings, specifications, instruments of service, and other documents, data, or information of any kind, including all electronic files and data ('Documents') attached
o or 'linked' from this E-mail are protected by copyright pursuant to U.S. and international copyright laws. Your use of the Documents is controlled and restricted by the Ie!:ms...Qf
JSJO. By downloading the attached files or by accessing the links contained in this E-mail message, you are agreeing to the lem.o!..use. COPYRIGHT@ 1994-2005 LANDFORM
::!~GINEERING COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. .
, Landform Engineering Company doing business as Landform.
9/27/2005