Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC May 2, 2000 CITY of ANDOVER -~ , 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 Regular City Council Meeting - Tuesday, May 2, 2000 agenda Call to Order - 7:00 PM Bookmark Firefighter Recognition Name Firefighter Awards Awards from League of Minnesota Cities Resident Forum Agenda Approval Consent Agenda Approval of Minutes minutes Discussion Items 1. Sketch Plan/Harstad Townhome Development/Sect. 29 & 30/Harstad Companies harstad 2. Sketch Plan/Chesterton Commons North Second Addition/Sect. 14/Ashford Dev. chesterton 3. Comprehensive Plan AmendmentJRM to UR/Section 22/City of Andover cpandover 4. RezoningIM-2 to R-4/Section 22/City of Andover rzandover 5. Approve Special Use Permit (SUP 00-02)/Mining Permit/I 6449 Narcissus Street NW /B&L Finance supb&1 6. Anoka County Ditch #6 Assessment Update ditch6 7. Reconsider Request/Street Lights/Langfeld's Oakridge Estates strlight 8. Discuss Exhibit NDevelopment PhasinglDevelopment Policy Guideline devpolicy '\ 9. Discuss Sale of City Property/139th Avenue and Crosstown Blvd. NW cityprop '-~ Staff. Committees. Commissions 10. Order Date/Public Hearing/Snowrnobiles/Ordinance 107 ordlO7 II. Schedule EDA MeetinglMay 9 eda 12. Schedule Strategic Planning Workshop/June workshop Non-Discussion/Consent Items 13. Approve SUP(SUP 00-03/Relocation of Principal Structure/17xx Ward Lake Drive/Lawrence lawrence 14. Approve Variance (V AR 00-08)/Minimum Buildability Requirement/28xx 168th Lane NW /Roshau roshau 15. Approve Variance (V AR 00-09/Lot Depth/13913 Olive Street NW/Woodland Development woodland 16. Approve Variance (V AR 00-11 )/Frontyard Setback/15405 Nightingale Street NW /Gor-em, LLC gorem 17. Approval to Sell Surplus Fire Engine #6 fireengine 18. Disposal of Surplus Fire Equipment fireequip 19. Return of Surplus Equipment surplusequip 20. Respond to Builders Association/Ordinance 247/Right-of-Way Management ord247 21. Approve Plans & Specs/00-14/142XX Round Lake Blvd. Construction apprOO14 22. Award Bid/99-28/Navajo St., 173rd Ave. & 175'h Ave. bid9928 23. Award Bid/99-35/Woodland Estates 2nd Addition bid9935 24. Order Plans & Specs/00-22/Misc. Concrete Curb and Gutter ordOO22 25. Reject Bids/98-29/Grey Oaks reject9829 26. Award Bid/99-36/Sunridge bid9936 27. Approve Resolution for Establishing Compliance with Reimbursement Bonds/99-35(Woodland Estatesbonds 2nd Addn.), 99-28(Navajo St., l73rd Ave. & 175th Ave.) & 99-36(Sunridge) , , 28. Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Information Systems Coordinator iscoord ',-../ 29. Special City Council Meeting May II mayll Mayor/Council Input Payment of Claims Adjournment I CITY OF ANDOVER I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Mav 2,2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Approval of Minutes City Clerk\! .U)V ITEM NO. Approval of Minutes The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes: April18, 2000 Regular Meeting (Orttel absent) April 18, 2000 Special Meeting (Orttel absent) , ) April 24, 2000 Special Meeting (Orttel, Johnson absent) , I CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: May 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Community Development ITEM NO. David L. Carlberg l / Community Development Director Sketch Plan - Harstad Townhome Development Sections 29 & 30 Harstad Companies The City Council is requested to review and comment on the sketch plan of the Harstad Townhome Development located in Sections 29 & 30 as being proposed by Harstad Companies. The sketch plan consists of 50 townhome units and two single family lots. Planning and Zoning Commission Review The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the sketch plan on February 22, 2000. The Commission as well as residents were concerned with the appropriateness of the development in J this location in regard to density and buildability. Stormwater management was also a concern. Attached is the staff report presented to the Commission for background information. Also attached is the minutes from the meeting. Park and Recreation Commission Review The Park and Recreation Commission will be reviewing the sketch plan at their May 18, 2000 meeting. The Commission will most likely recommend the acceptance of cash in lieu of land. Neighborhood Meeting Harstad Companies has scheduled a neighborhood meeting at City Hall on Monday, May 1, 2000. Martin Harstad will be present at tonight's meeting to present the project to the Council and to discuss the results of the neighborhood meeting. I - Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 22 / ~ Chair Squires stated it would be appropriate to have the City Fire Marshall and st examine this issue, and take into consideration the County's comments, and then co forward with a recommendation to the City Council in terms of the appropriateness of that. Commissioner Apel inquired if there was something similar to tl 111 all area of Commercial Park. Mr. Carlberg stated this was correct. He indicated where Ja "eet was closed off to the residents to the south, there is somewhat of a Imockdown. He state ey would discuss this with the developer prior to the City Council meeting on March 6, and sent the comments for COlU1cil review. Chair Squires inquired if the Commissio as in consensus with the Andover Review Committee comments. Motion Apel, se nded by Dalien, to recommend to the City Council approval of the Comprehensiv Ian Amendment for the property from RU, Residential Urban to RM, Residential sity. Motion carried on a 6-ayes, O-nays, I-absent vote. J C u-ScI'iltres :;takd-this-item..would be considered at the March 6, 200Q City r.ol1nciLmeeting_ PRESENTATION: PROPOSED HARSTAD TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT - PRESENTATION BY HARSTAD COMPANIES. Mr. Carlberg provided the Commission with a map, which indicated the general location of the proposed Harstad Townhome Development. Martin Harstad, Harstad Homes Corp., stated they were proposing on a concept level only, 50 townhomes located on the wooded peninsula off of Bunker Lake Boulevard. He stated they were proposing 50 townhomes, or 25 twin homes, and two Single Fanlily lots. He indicated the actual units themselves would have the entries off of Bunker Lake Boulevard. He stated this would be an Association maintained type project. The two Single Falllily lots would be at the end of Woodbine Street, which currently is a dead end road. He stated they were proposing a breakaway gate at that point, because there are some issues involved Witll the length of the cul-de-sac in this location. He stated this would be a private drive, which would be maintained by the Association at "the end of the cul-de-sac street. Mr. Harstad provided pictures of the proposed units. He stated he has been building one-level townhomes for ten years, alld the proposed units would be a similar product to those built in RoseviIIe, New Brighton, Woodbury, Plymouth, very well established conummities that were available for examination. He stated they were proposing four different floor plans. He stated from , J the exterior, they are all alike. He indicated there would be a 1,544 squme foot unit with no basement, alld a 1,544 square foot unit, Which does have a basement, and an 1,886 square foot unit, ~ Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 I Page 23 with and without basements. He' stated the base price for these units would start at approximately $220,000. He stated there would be significant units that would go over $300,000 in this project. He stated there were some very nice wooded lots on this property. Mr. Harstad stated the time frame for the construction of the project would be approximately 3 years from start to finish. He indicated that he could not guarantee that, however, this is typical for a project of this size for his company. He stated they are before the Planning and Zoning Commission on a very preliminary basis, in order to receive input and determine the marmer in which they should proceed. He explained that they would be very willing to hold a neighborhood meeting, if this type of project appears to be feasible. He provided the Commission with floor plans, exterior renderings, and layouts of the proposed units. PUBLIC HEARING: SKETCH PLAN - HARSTAD TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT _ 50 TOWNHOME UNITS/2 SINGLE FAMILY-SECTIONS 29 & 30 - HARSTAD COMPANIES. Mr. Carlberg stated the largest issue with the Sketch Plan is the proposed land use change to the Multi-Family designation from the R-4, Single Family designation, which would be necessary. He stated the area was scheduled for development in the 1995/2000 time franle in the existing plan, I therefore, the high knoll area could be served by City sewer and water coming in from the Woodbine Street area, and could have developed in the last 5 years, although the propeliy owner has not chosen to develop it at this time. He stated the property would have to be developed under the Development Policy Guideline, arld there are some very strict timelines for preliminary plat submittal arld approval in order to proceed. He stated the proposed project would not develop in2000, but rather 2001 at the earliest, because it missed the July 1, and December 31 deadlines for preliminary plat approval. Mr. Carlberg indicated there were a number of boilerplate statements related to the different agencies that will be reviewing the proposal, the permits that are necessary, arld which ordinances do apply. He stated the Parks and Recreation Conunission will be reviewing the Sketch Plarl at the March 2 meeting, to determine Park Dedication in accordance with Ordinance No. 10, the City's Platting Ordinance, Section 9.07. He stated the Andover Review Committee reviewed this project of February 10, and have provided their comments. He indicated some of the larger issues related to this project include a Municipal State Aid designation from Woodbine Street, which is the northern end, all the way through the project to Bunker Lake Boulevard. He stated this is designated a MSA street in the City's future plan. He stated there is a fire access and knock down, however, not a through street in that area, arld this will have to be discussed by the Commission arld the Council as the project proceeds. Mr. Carlberg stated there is a question in terms of if this project proceeds, arld there is an MSA street provided in this development, a regional bikeway/walkway system is provided along Bunker Lake Boulevard, as all the major arterioles in the City's are looking at regional trail systems in the urban / areas, and the Andover Review Conunittee has recommended that a State Aid street be constructed . at least 35 feet in width, if a bike route is going to be included in the street system. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 24 Mr. Carlberg stated there is a high area to the west of the area, refereed to as Upland 1, and there was a question as to whether or not that area is included in the project. He stated the Review Committee is recommending that all of the private streets be public streets, and that State Aid designation be examined. He stated if the project does proceed under the proposed project, a variance would be required to the 500 foot maximum cul-de-sac lengths. Mr. Carlberg advised that the Sketch Plan is the opportunity for the Commission to give general direction to the City Council, and which items they would like to see provided in this development, as far as the design, and the Council will consider the Commission's comments, and the Andover Review Committee's review on March 6. Commissioner Apel inquired if the Comprehensive Plan covers more area than is being discussed. Mr. Carlberg stated this is a small component of a larger Comprehensive Amendment located in the area, and there were a number of residents who were desiring to comment on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the entire area. He stated they were specifically dealing with the project located on the high knoll from Bunker Lake Boulevard to Woodbine Street. He stated there would be testimony under the Comprehensive Plan amendment on this, and the entire area on that item. Motion Dalien, seconded by Apel, to open the public hearing on the Sketch Plan proposed by Harstad Development at 8:47 p.m. Motion carried on a 6-ayes, O-nays, I-absent vote. Chair Squires stated the Commission has reviewed some of the materials submitted by residents, expressing concerns that are more global than the layout of this project. He advised that if there are specific comments that relate to this particular proposal, and the issues that are presented, those comments will be taken at this time, and when the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is underway, and they get into the larger area, comments related to that should be brought forward at that time. Pat Belousek, 14076 Aztec Street stated her property is the back yard of the east side of the proposed site. She stated she has lived in this location for 15 years, and at least half of that time, that area has been completely underwater. She stated this was a real. concern. She inquired what the plans were for filling this area in. She stated she was not an expert in building and filling, however, she is aware that County Road 116 has serious problems because itwas built on fill. She pointed out that if they fill the property in, where would the water go. She inquired if it would go onto her property. Mrs. Belousek stated she drives out onto 140th Avenue onto County Road 116 every morning to go to work, and sits there for as long as 5 6 or 7 minutes. She stated this does not sound like much time, however, to sit in traffic that long gets very frustrating. She stated she has seen very many near misses from people becoming frustrated in such traffic. ~ - Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 25 Jack Brown, 4075 146th Avenue NW stated the previous process had combined both of the public hearings together, and here the resents were only being allowed to comment on one aspect of this matter. He stated the change of rules on these items makes it difficult, in that the approval of this item would be in effect, and approval of all of these items. He stated it should all be discussed as a comprehensive issue, and not only specific to this one little piece. He stated he was concerned that the entire concept of Medium and High Density housing in the entire area be discussed in tandem. Dennis Reinhardt, 14279 Woodbine Street stated he lived on the cul-de-sac, where they are discussing making the road a State Aid road, which it never was. He stated this was a 3D-year-old community, and it was basically unfair to do such a thing, in terms of putting the proposed density in the area, and changing their style of living completely. He stated he agreed that the entire project should be brought forward simultaneously, because one step does lead to the other, which is going to change things and make it more confusing for everyone. Mr. Reinhardt stated he had concerns with regards to the watershed, traffic, making the road a State Aid Road, and then going on to 143rd, which was never adequately upgraded with the previous development that went through in this location. He stated he was concerned about the rezoning and the density more than anything. He stated that this was one of Andover's first developments, and many of these residents have lived there for more than 15 years. He stated for many years people have been told by the property owner and City Hall, that Woodbine and other streets in that area are cul-de-sac or dead end roads because ofwetIands. He stated now they are being proposed to change again. He stated overall they need to examine the entire project, and the amount of proposed density, and what is being talcen away from the community. Patrick O'Neil , 14330 Yucca Street stated his main concern is the manner in which this development COlmects to 143 rd A venue, in light of the discussion over the past two years relating to the traffic problems, and how with the curving nature of the road, many people seem to believe tllis is tIleir own private drag strip. He stated that if this development proceeds, he did not want 143rd Avenue and this development to connect, giving more traffic on 143td, Yucca, 145tl" E1dorado, and 147th, where people cut across Round Lake Boulevard over to ih Avenue. He stated his primary concern was that this development does not add more traffic the existing traffic problems. Robert Manary, 14268 Woodbine Street stated they have lived at this location for five years, and when they purchased the house they were assured they had a cul-de-sac on the end, and now the rules are being changed. He stated the reason most of the people moved to Andover was the quality of life, and now they are considering putting in higher densities that are like all of the places the people moved from. He stated they have a rare opportunity to have City that is beautiful, livable and a good place to raise their families. He requested the Commissioners walk through the proposed area, which is a very narrow strip of sand, and he does not see how this type of density can be constructed on this land, without flooding out the rest of the property Owners. He stated they were all surrounded by wetland, and where would the water go. He stated he did not know how they Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission .Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 26 would control this. He explained that there were no ditches for the water to run off, and no place for it to go, except into the wetland. Mr. Manary stated the area is comprised of a multitude of animal and bird life. He stated deer come through constantly, pheasants, fox, min1e, and in the summer there are geese and ducks being hatched, and tlns would all change. He stated there was no way to have this development, and leave the ecology intact. He stated they would just destroy a wetland, and tl1ere are not enough of those areas in Andover. He stated they are building everywhere in the City, and he understands that growth is necessary, however, tl1e City should grown in a quality manner so that it is livable for those who reside in it. Chair Squires stated one of the things being considered at this time, is a change from Single to Multi Family. He inquired if the residents who had commented were opposed to a change from Single Family to Multiple Family, or opposed to any development ofthis property at all. Mr. Manary stated he would prefer no development whatsoever, however, he understands that development makes cities and neighborhoods. He indicated however, that there was no way to build the proposed density on this narrow strip of land and not destroy everytl1ing that is tl1ere. He stated it is a very small sand strip, and at the edge of the sand strip, it is black muck, down approximately 20 to 30 feet. He stated tlns would have to be excavated, replaced with sand, and then concrete and asphalt would be placed over it. He inquired where the water would then go. He stated it would go up into the adjacent properties' backyards, and up into their houses. He requested the Commission walk the site to examine it. Mr. Manary stated there were funds available for State parks, he stated there were not enough parks in the City, and this presented a rare opportunity. He stated this was a beautiful area. He reiterated that the developers desire to develop and sell there land, adding that they all would like to be in that position, however, maybe there is a better use for it. He stated he did not see how they would protect the ecology, and put this type of housing in this area. He stated the proposed houses have no backyards, therefore, there was no place for the children to play. He stated the children would get into trouble because there is no place to play. He stated they might as well be in City streets in downtown Minneapolis because there is no room to play, adding that all were aware what this leads to. He stated these are very expensive homes, and appear to be very nice, however, this area is not conducive to this type of development. He noted that everyday people go through th.is area, either walking skiing, or walking their dogs through from both ends. He stated it was a very enjoyable and peaceful place, wInch would obviously change, however, this type of impact should be minimized. Mr. Manary stated he had researched his property before purchasing Ins homes, and was told that the cul-de-sac would continue to be such, however, now the City was changing the rules. Commissioner Apel requested clarification regarding the exact location ofMr. Manary' s home. ~- Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 / Page 27 Mr. Manary stated he lived right on the edge of the cul-de-sac, on the end of Woodbine Street. He stated his property faced into the wetland, which was huge, and this would just fill up with water. He stated they have had some very dry years, and the water is fairly low, however, if they have a wet year, with all of the proposed concrete and asphalt runoff, and no place for that water to go, it will go into the people's basements, all away around the development. Fred Capra, 14036 Underclift Street stated the back of his home is facing towards the proposed development. He stated he purchased his home in 1987, and the main reason for purchasing tillS house was because they were infonned there would be no building in that area, because it was reserve land. He stated at that time, he and his wife had seen other houses that were nicer, however, decided on this house because no one could build behind tIlem. He stated the comments of the residents indicate that the homeowners have been misinfonned by someone. He stated he feels that he was misinfonned himself in 1987. He stated someone should be held responsible for all of this misinfonnation, and he was not aware of who this might be, however, tIllS was the main reason he had purchased his home in this area. Mr. Capra stated the previous summer he and all of his neighbors received letters from the City that grass clippings were being thrown back into this area, and there would be penalties for throwing grass clipping in this area, however, now it appears to be acceptable to put housing back there. He stated he did not understand this. He stated he agreed in regard to the potential water problems, adding that he would be one of those affected by this. Jan Manary, 14268 Woodbine Street NW stated they purchased their home, and like other residents, they looked at bigger and better homes, homes tllat would have fit their lifestyle much better than the one they live in currently. She stated they chose their home because oftlle lot, because of the cul-de- sac, and the wildlife that were drawn to this property. She stated she is a very avid birdwatcher. She has geese, and her geese have returned to have their young every year near their home. She stated this was a time tlley looked forward to as an entire family. She stated they have a lot of privacy, and were willing to live in a smaller home in order to have that privacy. She invited the Commission members to walk her yard in the spring. She stated it is always wet and soggy, and she was very concerned to think that the water from this development would be in her basement, rather than in the ground and that the wildlife that they enjoy and cherish will be gone. Mike LaBelle, 3858 143rd Avenue stated one of his main concems is in regard to the traffic. He stated when the Meadows of R01Uld Lake were built, 143rd A venue was a through street from 7th to 9th. He stated he lived directly across the street from the park, and last year there were complaints pertaining to the traffic and the speeding into tlle park He stated tllis proposal would add to that. He stated the area is beautiful, and there is a big horned owl that lives in the area as well, and if this bird is on tile endangered species list, this should certainly be considered. He stated he was very upset about this proposal. He stated they were misinformed in that none of this land was supposed to be developed. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission A1eeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 28 Rafel King, 14030 Underclift Street stated his property also leads to the back of the proposed site. He stated they have just experienced a problem in a refinancing situation in ten11S of the City stating that their property was possibly located in a flood plain, at this time, because of the relocation of the flood lines. He stated his main concern was in regard to the area between Round Lake and the surrounding wetlands, what has been changed already, he wondered if the developments in these areas have caused the flood plains and lines to be raised, and if they add more houses and further density in there, would this cause a further increase in the water levels, thereby causing everyone living in the area to be pushed up into a flood plain, because there is no place for the water to go, and if everyone surrounding this project would have to bear the expense of having to pay higher insurance rates to allow for the development of more houses. Larry Mueller 3810 143rd Avenue stated he was concerned with regard to tlle wildlife habitat that would be destroyed. He stated he was aware there was significant wildlife in this area, adding that he walks his dog back there. He stated when he purchased his property, he was told that the subject property was owned by tlle Army Corps of Engineers and the DNR, ffild would not be developed. He stated now the story has changed, and he does not think this is right. Charlie Ross, 3948 145th Avenue inquired who has investigated the past promises tllat were made in terms of the statements that this area would not be developed. He stated he was one of the first houses in the Meadows of Rounds Lake, and was told that this property was owned by the Army Corps of Engineers and could not be developed. He stated he had to wait to close for 90 days, until the flood maps were re-drawn to approve the construction of his house. He stated the water was obviously a major concern at tllat point, ffild he wondered if they consider rezoning and putting more hOlises in, how much investigation has been applied toward this. He stated he property is still under the sanle constraints, and he is a fair distance from the proposed site, ffild during the summertime, after a good rain, the back 15 feet of his lawn is soaking wet, constffiltly. He stated he hopes someone takes a good look at this prior to approving any zoning changes. Tom Balski, 1446 Street stated he had lived in Andover for 22 years, and about 12 to 15 years ago, his property flooded due to high water. He stated if more houses are developed. He stated Ella could attest to this because her house was under water. He stated he did not understand this. He stated he doesn't understand why they were proposing $200,000 homes that won't go in because they would flood, but attempt to sneal<: in another low income home. He inquired why it is not one plot, and why it was being broken up into two. Scott and Maria Boylo, 14269 Woodlawn stated he lived at the end of the dead end street. He indicated his concerns were with regard to the traffic, the flooding from the wetlands, the property values, however, primarily because, they had selected their property because of the location, neighborhood, and because they were about to start a family. He stated they have live in their home for two years, and had selected it so that they could raise their children there. He stated now it would be opened up to traffic, which would completely change tile ffi'ea. He stated it vvas also their understanding upon moving into the area, that the site was wetland and it would not be developed. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22,2000 Page 29 Mr. LaBelle stated he would like to clari,7 his fIrst comment. He stated he was concerned with how Round Lake Boulevard connects to l43r Avenue, to Yucca, 145t\ Eldorado, and l47th. He stated they have had problems with the City regarding traffIc problems that the police are watching, and measuring the speed going through. He stated they have put in temporary speed bumps, and that has not addressed the problem of the traffIc. He stated there were many children in the area, a park, adding that he did not believe putting up a chain link fence in the park was a solution to the traffic problem. He stated they should address the problem, and not attempt to keep kids fenced in, in a park. He stated he was concerned that this development does not generate extra traffIc through Woodbine, onto l43rd Avenue. Chair Squires explained that the proposal was that the development was not to have access from Woodbine. Mr. O'Neil stated he was vehemently opposed to opening this road up to Municipal State Aid, as this would only exacerbate an already bad problem. Robert Belousek 1406 Aztec Street NW stated they have lived on their property for 15 years, and , have had back yard flooding during times of heavy rains, which remains on the property for weeks on end. He stated if the developer puts a road down toward Bunker Lal<e Road to accommodate these houses, it would mal<e it a constant flooding problem in their backyards. He stated there is a question in the integrity on the part of the City on this, because when they fIrst moved there, they were told, like everyone else, that tIns area could not be developed because it is wetland. Secondly, about three years prior, some huge dump trucks were dumping fIll directly in back of their property, and he had called City Hall to see what was going on. He stated the person at City Hall had indicated this was just temporary storage, which would be moved back out, and that they could not build back there. He stated this was twice, once 15 years earlier, and once 3 years earlier, plus all those people in between, who were told tllis. He stated this is a matter of integrity, and someone is not aware what someone else is doing. Mr. King stated he understood that the notifIcation regarding this land change proposal is to be mailed out to residents within 350 feet of the proposed site. He pointed out that there are approximately 30 houses that are impacted by tins application, that are outside the notification boundary, therefore, they are not even notified of what is occurring in their backyards, yet also enjoying the same wetland area, and have the same concerns with regard to flood waters and traffic. Chair Squires explained that the 350 feet is notification required by State law. He stated in addition to this, the City also publishes notice that people can read, and lately the City has been posting signs, and goes beyond the actual requirement. Mr. Carlberg stated there were two processes currently under consideration, which include tlle Sketch Plan of the development. He stated staff notified within 350 feet of the property that is ~ Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 30 proposed for development. He stated for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, which involves a larger area than that being discussed with regard to the Sketch Plan, there was notification within 350 feet outside of that larger area. He stated people were notified of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment in the larger area, but only the Sketch Plan were notified within 350 feet of that project. He stated like the other Sketch Plans currently before the Commission, it relates to the specific area within the proposed project. He explained that they attempt to put proposed land use changes out in these areas, and many times they don't have enough signs, and are ordering more signs. He pointed out that this was a huge public hearing process for the City, with the largest agenda that they have seen before them this evening, therefore it was difficult to get the information out, however, they believe notification, as 1ar as the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process, was distributed to the people based upon the number of people present. Mr. Reinhardt stated with the road coming through for fire and safety purposes, one fire department would send a vehicle from 116 which would be the most direct route, and the other would come from down from the north, down ill A venue, and would end up in pretty much the same spot, therefore, he did not think that was a valid concern. He stated he had some friends in the Mounds View area during the incident with the pipeline explosion, and the fire had been directed right at , them, because of the direction of their streets. He stated there are pros and cons with regard to this. Mr. O'Neil stated the notice provided to the residents indicates that they would have to come down to City Hall to view the application. He stated most people work during the daytime hours, and are unable to get to City Hall to do this. He suggested the City put copies of the application in at one of the local libraries to the people most closely affected. He explained that libraries are open on weekends, and people could go to view the application, which may result in less misinformation when they come to public meetings. He stated he just started a new job, and did not have time available to get to City Hall to see the application, however, if it was at the local library, like the one at Round Lalce Boulevard, or the main library on Highway 10, would make it available to him as well. Mr. Reinhardt stated the reason there is a large turnout at the cunent meeting, is because of word of mouth, not by the notification process. He stated people living directly across the street from him received no notice. Donna Berklane, 4060 146th Lane NW stated up until last night she had no clue that any of this was occurring. She stated she had two young children, and had moved to Andover to start their life. She stated they enjoyed walking through their development, and were also told that nothing would be developed on the wetland. She stated she had been curious why tl1ere was a mound of dirt at the end of Eldorado Street, and had been inforn1ed that building had ceased in this area, because they had found a rare turtle nesting ground, and the DNR put an end to the building. She indicated her children enjoy taldng bike rides to that area to look at the wildlife that is there. She stated they have no sidewalks. She stated she was born and raised in northeast Minneapolis, and moved to Andover. She stated there was an eminent danger for children just riding bikes on the san1e path that vehicles -- Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 31 are travelling on. She stated the corridor of 143rd Avenue, which curves around on Dakota Street, and the children that she sees on l43rd Avenue are at risk because the drivers do not care. She stated she has been driving the speed limit along this road, and has had young people behind her pushing her vehicle to go faster because they are in a rush to get where they are going. She stated her property elevation was high, in comparison to most of the otber people who had spoken, however, her back yard is saturated every time it rains, and the water remains standing for quite a long time. She stated she was concerned that even though her property is probably more protected than some of the other homes, as to what was actually proposed to occur. She stated they built in 1993, in the summer, and feel that their house is shifting. She stated that if these bouses are built on less structured soils, what would bappen to the structure of the homes over the years. She stated she was also concerned for the new homeowners of the proposed development. Tim Neuholtz, 4165 146t11 Avenue NW stated he and his wife had moved to the community approximately 2 months ago, and do not leave anywhere near this particular development. He stated he had heard everyone commenting so far, and it appeared that they were all on the same wavelength. He stated the City has apparently gone through and figured out what they want to do with the land, and has made some decision which has resulted in this enormous turnout. He stated it was very clear to him that no one is interested in having this development move forward. He inquired who was accountable for this, and what the City intends to do. Chair Squires stated no decisions have been made. He explained that that is the reason they are sitting there today. He stated the Council has directed the Conunission to hold a public hearing, to tal<e public input, to take the citizens' comments and concerns, and then to go through the decision making process. He advised that it was incorrect to state that the City has made a decision, and inquire who is accountable. He stated he believed Mr. Neuholtz has tbe process backwards. He stated they want to hear what people's concerns are, and hear what tbe developer is proposing, and then make some recommendations. He stated ultimately the City COlmcil would make the decision, not the Planning Commission, but that comes after this process. Mr. Neuholtz explained that in light of the planning which has already been done, and it looks like the project is moving forward, this appears to be the residents' one opportunity to comment. He stated the suggestion pertaining to putting information in the libraries prior to coming to this point, would be a good source of infonnation for all. He stated that now that the Commission is aware of the viewpoint of the citizens, what action were they plmming to tal(e, from a City planning standpoint, if any. Chair Squires stated the Commission would indicate their feelings, after the closing of the public hearing, as they have done with the otller applications. He stated at that point, it was up to the Commission to have some discussion regarding all of the concerns they have heard fi-om everyone, and what the development proposal is, and how it fits into the City plans and ordinances, and then the Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council. He advised that this is how the process works. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting / Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 32 Motion Falk, seconded by Hedin, to close the public hearing for the Sketch Plan at 9:29 p.m. Motion carried on a 6-ayes, O-nays, I-absent vote. Chair Squires suggested the discussion of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment be discussed at this point as well, and then discuss all items together, so that people have an opportunity to have input on both matters before the Commission engages in discussion. At this time, Chair Squires called a brief recess. The Planning and Zoning Commission meeting reconvened at 9:35 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA 00-04) - CHANGE LAND USE DISTRICT DESIGNATION ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY ROSELLA SONSTEBY AND ARIUA (MINNEGASCO) IN THE VICINITY OF 7TH AVENUE NW * BUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD NW FROM RU, RESIDENTIAL URBAN SINGLE FAMILY TO RM, RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY,' RU RESIDENTIAL URBAN SINGLE FAMILY TO RM-2, RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE DWELLING; AND RM, RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY TO RM-2, RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE DWELLING BY THE CITY OF ANDOVER. / Chair Squires stated City Planner, John Hinzman would present the Staff Report on Item 11, Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change a larger portion of property than that involved in the Sketch Plan from RU, Residential Urban to RM, Residential Medium Density, and RM-2, Residential Multiple Density. Mr. Hinzman reiterated that the City has initiated this action, so that the City can present this to the Ci,ty Council as an option for development in the future. He provided the Commission with a location map, indicating that the area highlighted in yellow is cUlTently guided for Residential Urban development. He explained that this represents Single-Family development, on average, approximately 2.1 units per acre. He stated a large portion of this area was proposed to be changed to RM, Residential Medium density, which could be constructed at up to six units per acre. He stated much ofthis area is wetland, and there appears to be some buildable land in the area where the proposed Sketch Plan is located. Mr. Hinzman stated the other area that the City would be looking at changing from Residential Urban development to Residential Multiple development, would be that area just south of Dehns Addition, which is south of I44th A venue and east of ih A venue, which is comprised of 7 to 8 acres of buildable land. He stated in between this property, and toward the south, there is an area that is being considered for Multiple Residential higher-density units, which would be up to 13 units per acre. He indicated the first part of this is a redesignation that is currently designated for Multiple development, which is highlighted in orange. He stated this is located east of Slim's Auto Body, on ill A venue and County Road 116 on the north, and also between 116 and 141 st A venue on tlle south side. He advised that one half of the pipe tank farm to the north would be designated for the high- density residential designation as well. He explained that the reason for doing this is to center the Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 33 higher density development on that main comer of 7th and 116, and to have the density be lower as you proceed from that point. Mr. Hinzman stated the western portion of that property, there is no proposed development at this . time. He stated there was no indication from the landowners of anything that would be occurring specifically on that property. Mr. Hinzman stated less than 40 percent of the site appears to be buildable. The unbuildable wetlands buffer a lot of those areas towards the east and north end of the development, near Rosella's and The Meadows of Round Lake Additions. He stated this means that nearly 300 additional housing units could be constructed with tillS proposed change on the site. He explained tIlat half of those UllltS would be within the high-density area, abutting tile Bunker Lake Boulevard and 7tl1 Avenue areas. He stated the closest this would come to Single Family development would be on the south side, near the city of Anoka, on the south side of 41st Avenue, with approximately 15 Single Fanlily homes, which would be distanced approximately 100 feet from the site. He stated on tile north side of the development would be the Delms Addition, where the homes back up, and could be as little as 30 feet from the site. He indicated that with those two Single Fanlily developments within very close proximity, tIlat with tile development proposal that would come through, they would need to take care tIlat there be proper buffering and landscaping of those areas. Mr. Hinzman outlined the Commission's options for action. He stated staff was available for comments from the COl1U1lission, after which time, the matter could be opened up for a public hearing. Chair Squires requested clarification with regard to the areas highlighted in dark red on the comer of 7th Avenue and both north and south of Bunker Lake Boulevard. Mr. Hinzman stated this area was zoned commercial, and was not proposed to change. Chair Squires inquired if the property to the east of that, which is highlighted in orange, and cross- hatched, bolli north and south of Bunker Lake Boulevard is cun-ently RM, Residential Medium density, willi a proposal to change that to RM-2. Mr. Hinzman stated this was con-ect. Chair Squires requested Mr. Hinzman explain tile difference between the RM and RM-2 zoning designations. Mr. Hinzman stated the RM District would allow 6 units per acre, and the RM-2 would all 13 units per acre. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000. Page 34 Chair Squires inquired if to the east of that, south of Bunker Lake Boulevard, the proposal was to change that from RU, Residential Urban to RM-2 as well. Mr. Hinzman stated this was correct. He indicated that the property, which was crosshatched, would be going to the high-density designation. He stated that of the area to the east, the southwest corner is buildable, and the remainder drops off into the wetIand. Commissioner Hedin noted discussion pertaining to a Tri-City Civic Center. He inquired if that corner that is not designated commercial be considered for tIlis. Mr. Hinzman stated currently this is proposed to be situated on the west side of ih A venue in the City of Anoka. Commissioner Hedin inquired what would occur is Anoka desired not to participate in this proposal. Mr. Hinzman stated he was not certain. Motion by Hedin, seconded by Dalien, to open the public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment at 9:45 p.m. Motion carried on a 6-ayes, O-nays, I-absent vote. Jody Hitchtrik, 945 40th Avenue, Anoka, stated she has been sending arOUlld a petition which she has provided to the Commission, and has obtained many more signatures than when. entering the meeting. She read the petition as follows: "The current plan has theseproperties rated as RU, 2.1 units per acre, and RM, which is 6 units per acre. The City of Andover is proposing to change these to RM-2, which could be 10 to 13 units per acre. It should be noted that iliis usage appears to indicate that these units will include rental properties, which will be apm1ment complexes, and/or high-density townhomes. The residents feel that it would be highly Ulllikely that the County would allow a new access to occur on either 7tl1 Avenue or Bunker Lake Boulevard. The close proximity to the intersection and the amount of traffic would increase the occurrence of accidents. This leaves ilie access to occur of 41 st A venue. . Much of the traffic would use 9ili A venue in Anoka as an entrance, and there are already traffic problems at this uncontrolled intersection. The City of Andover would be collecting taxes on their property, but leaving the problems up to the city of Anoka and the local residents. The city of Anoka maintains the street systems in this area, and will continue to do so. The city of Anoka would also be likely to be called to handle any police matters, due to the proximity to Anoka City limits. / This higher proposed density is unacceptable to the residents in the neighborhoods south of 1415t Avenue. It is our contention that tl1is will increase traffic, crime, lower house values, and put an -- - Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 35 overall detriment to the community. This is not something that should be built in a close proximity to Anoka High School, because of the potential for problems that will occur. It will encourage crime, increase traffic, and cause additional parking problems in the area. We, the residents of the city of Anoka and the sun-ounding area will be directly affected in a negative . way by tllls proposal. We contend that the plans should remain as a Single Fmnily, and the only change would be to change the westernmost parcel to Single Family also. I have some additional comments to make for you to consider before you agree to this mnendment. You state iliat tIlis is a Comprehensive Plan, and that there are no actual plans for development subn1itted. Although I question tIlat, I will take you at your word. Consider this; you are swinging the door wide open for a high density development that will cause many problems, both for the residents in my neighborhood, but also for those in yours, and other surrolmding communities. The future of high-density development would be in very close rmlge to Anoka High School. There are currently 3,184 students enrolled in that school and the breakdown of where these students reside are as follows: 1,235, or 39 percent of that population reside in Andover. 976, or 31 percent reside in Rmnsey. 786 reside in Anoka, and a 25 percent breakdown, and the other 187 reside in Coon Rapids and _Township, and are approximately 3 percent each. Therefore, your proposed developments will affect constituents of your city, and all of the surrounding cities who have children currently attending Anoka High School, or who will be. I have also found out that the School District is considering building a school in the northeast comer of BUllker Lake Boulevard and ill A venue, where you are also proposing a land use change of high density. I have spoken with Kirby Beck, who is a commwlity Police Officer for the city of Coon Rapids. His sole purpose is to track and take initiatives on crime within the city in areas of high-density housing. I lived on Northdale Boulevm"d, by the Coon Rapids High School, in 1990, when the Camelot Square apartments opened. These apartments look extremely nice, and appeared well cared for, but the are located directly across and to the east of Coon Rapids High School, and Coon Rapids Middle School. We immediately in the neighborhood had notices ofrapes and crimes that were increasing in our area. Mr. Beck confirmed this for me. He even stated that he would never recommend the building of a high density housing anywhere near a high school. Camelot Square has been in tile top tlrree for ilie most reported crimes, and has often been number one, mld these crimes were not and are not petty. There have been numerous shootings, a murder, Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 36 and in one sUl1U11er, there were 5 to 6 crack houses busted. I grew up in that area mld there was not so much as a la.1ife flashed. The big deal was maybe somebody once in a while getting into a fight. Mr. Beck informed me that they have noticed ill1 influx of people from Cl1icago moving in, and being directly involved in some of these crimes. All of this is occurring directly across from two schools in our district. Coon Rapids High School even has a full-time security officer in the parking lot. Students have often skipped school, and consider it a party pass to go over to the apartments and participate in illegal behavior. I know we all tlunk we have good kids, but we cannot put our heads in the smld, and say it won't happen to use, because it will. I doubt that anyone who has students attending the schools in our area wants the possibility for this to occur. The last issue has been discussed by a lot of people here, but I want to bring it to your attention again, and it is the traffic. I have gotten the most recent traffic counts taken at Bunker Lake Boulevard and 7t1J Avenue, as well as those at 7ili Avenue and 38th Avenue, which is the entrance to the High School. They are as follows: On Bunker, across 7th to the west, there m'e 10,063 cars per day, and that last count was taken in 1998. On Bunker across 7t1J to the east, there are 12,506, mld that was taken in 1997. On 7tl1, across Bunker to the north, there were 12,346 cars, mld that was in 1997. On i\ across Bunker to the south, there were 14,020 cars per day tal<en in 1997. The intersection at tile High School takes 19,695 cars per day, and that was taken in 1999. On 38th Avenue, onto ih, the cross through street, tal<es 14,464, and that was in 1999. You are proposing over 300 more units in that area, and if you don't think that is going to cause a problem, I suggest you think again. These are heavily traveled roads, and they are becoming more so each year. In the County's current five-year plans, there are no plans for any changes to these intersections, and it does not appear that it is going to happen in the near future. Your proposed plans could create such a large influx of traffic it would make this an extremely dangerous area. There are already crosswalks in front of the High School tllat they cml only use at their own risk because of the traffic. You have to go down to the light, and then you still might get run over. If the County denies access to Bunker from the land to the south, there is a potential for an increase from your projects, simply on the souili side of Bunker to increase approximately 180 cars into our neighborhood directly, using 9th Avenue as a cross over." Ms. Hitchtrik noted tlle comment that residents make an average of 10 trips per day in their car. She stated that would be 1,800 more trips up and down her neighborhood, across one street. She continued: "This is only a short list because of the short mnount oftime that you chose to give us to review your intentions. I think there are too many concerns for you to take action at this time. There are mmlY Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 37 other possibilities tllan what have been proposed, . and I have one last suggestion for Rosella Sonsteby to consider. If you're going to sell that land, sell that land at the south of Bunker to the city of Anoka, so that we control what happens in our community rather than having a single person or another city dictate what happens in our community." Barb Murray, 738 41 st Avenue, Anoka stated she appreciated tlle opportUllity to give her comments that evening. She stated they purchased their home in 1987, and she had done her research in moving to Anoka County. She stated one of the things that attracted them to this area was the School System, the communities, and the sense of community. She stated she had much concern with regard to property values, in terms of what this proposal would do to the value of her home, wiili high density development across the street, witllin 100 feet of their property. Mrs. Murray stated she has two students, one former, mld one current Anoka High School students. She stated she was very much aware of the traffic flow, in that she deals with it on a daily basis. She stated she drops her son off at school and won't allow him to walk the short distance, because she fears for his life in terms of crossing 7th A venue. She stated she goes to work in that traffic, and sees accidents daily. Mrs. Murray stated Anoka High School is one of the largest in the State, wl1ich has overcrowding already, and with the potential for 300 additional sites, she is concerned what impact tIus would have on District 11 future school proposals. Mrs. Mun-ay stated she has concerns with access to the property, in that it would be of 141 st Avenue, and not off of County Road 116. She stated 10 trips today is the Metropolitan Council estimate on Single Fmnily travel trips per day, and tllis would greatly impact the ClU'rent traffic. Mrs. Murray requested tile Planning and Zoning Commission oppose the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. She advised that it was necessary they be visionaries for the future. generations. Karen Ames, 4310 144th Lmle inquires why tile people from Anoka who were present received notification, however, she lives right on the border, yet neither she nor mlY of her neighbors received notification. Mrs. Ames stated the Gas Company is located directly behind her dwelling. She stated she has live in that location for 20 years, and she has seen the Gas CompmlY make huge holes in the ground, and bury barrels of unknown substances. She stated they had done this on a routine basis, and inquired if any though had been given to this in terms of the potential for contamination in this area. Mrs. Ames inquired if the City of Andover desired the City to be comprised of condominium type homes and all of the buildings to be similar. She stated she like diversity. She stated that with regard to the Cab Interceptor, she was informed that it was unavailable to come to her area, and that the Cab Interceptor in Coon Rapids was full, and would not be able to service mlY more areas, so that RegularAndover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 38 the Chmnplin Cab Interceptor would be servicing their area. She inquired what Cab Interceptor . would be serving the proposed site. Mrs. Ames inquired if there was any stipulation that tlle proposed site is wetland, mld would always remain so, or if someone could come in and fill in that area, and continue to develop. She stated she was aware that at one time, the City of Andover had a stipulation that required that if they fill in one wetland, another area must be designated to mitigate tl1is. She stated she knew the City of Andover has not been complying with that stipulation. Mrs. Ames stated she saw no parks set aside in this area. She stated she was aware there were no plmls yet. She inquired why they were proposing to change the density, prior to knowing what types of homes or apartment buildings were proposed to go in. She stated tllese factors should be considered prior to changing the density of the area. She pointed out that a grade school was to be constructed across the street, on ih A venue, and all of the children would be crossing this street, which was a safety concern. She requested tlle Commission consider all of these items, prior to making ilieir decision. John Lorsung, 5157 145th Avenue NW stated he was the individual who owned the easement in the Meadows of Round Lake. He indicated he had grown up in St. Paul in the Selby Dale area, and before Interstate 94 cmne in, it was a very nice little town. He stated within five-years after the interstate went through, 90 percent of the people left tllat neighborhood because their bikes were being stolen. He stated the house iliat he had grown up in, the windows were con.stantly being broken, and he and his friends were beaten up every day. Mr. Lorsung stated he had grown up Witll five young men. He stated one of them is in prison for armed robbery, one is in prison for killing his wife with an overdose of drugs, one is in prison for carrying a concealed weapon, and had shot someone with it, and he was the only one who got away because his mother had sent him to Boys Town. He stated he was attempting to paint a picture of something that might, or might not happen, however, he had lived in Brooklyn Park for two years, a mile for tlle Century COUlt apartments, and he left and moved to Andover, thinking that he would not have his children be raised in the smne atmosphere he had been. He stated he thought all had similar fears. He stated if they wanted to construct something, they should build Single Family housing, which would not depreciate the value of their houses. Mr. Lorsung stated children are not taught in school to be leaders, but rather, followers. He stated they all had a legitimate concern with regard to the children. I-Ie reiterated that if they wanted to build sometIling, they should build something that is good for the community, not something that will destroy it. Darrell Golden, 729 40th Lmle stated he could not see the City agreeing to let the apartrnents be built there. He stated that even in the City of Anoka, if they go where the apmtments are now, they have more crime up there than mlY oilier place in the entire city of Anoka. I-Ie stated if they start building Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting \ Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 39 apartments out here, the crime would start at tllis end, and then tlle people in Anoka would be ilie ones to suffer. He stated they were putting all the expensive homes way out in another area, far enough away they would not have to be concerned about it. He suggested they construct the apartments out there, in the Edina of ilie north, Andover. Steven Garn, 3912 10th Avenue North, Anoka stated he could understand the need for Multi-Fmnily or high density housing, but he does not think it is necessary to put it right in Andover, adjacent to a High School. He stated that with as much land as there is in Andover, there must be a better area, away from the wetlands. Brad Holland, 854 41st Avenue stated he purchased his house four years ago, because of its location. He stated it was a nice dead end road, which only tUl'ns right on 9th Avenue. He stated he did not desire to look at apartment buildings. He indicated he has small children, as do llis surrounding neighbors, mld if they change the zoning to put apartment buildings in, tile traffic will all come down 9th A venue, and his neighborhood. He stated the people of Anoka would suffer directly by this proposal. He stated the people who live at the end of the street already speed down the street, and traffic is already a problem there. He stated this would only stand to increase by building apartment buildings there. Mr. Holland stated he was not opposed to building Single Fmnily across the street, and it would be nice to have more neighbors, however, he was strongly opposed to building apmiment buildings or Multiple Fmnily buildings across the street. Sean Wolther, Associate Planner for the City of Anoka stated he had been asked to attend the meeting and provide brief testimony. He indicated that he was not at this time in opposition to the rezoning, however, tlley would like to have further opportunity to discuss the potential effects to the Single Fmnily neighborhoods to the south, and ilie effects on traffic, and those concerns. He stated the City Council has not had the opportunity to speak with staff or tl1e PJmming and Zoning Commission about this, and would like to have that opportlUlity, therefore, would request iliat if they move forward in tllis process, tlley would table action on ilie item, mld allow that to occur. Barb Gold, 3996145th Avenue NW stated nothing she has heard from the City has been consistent with the things she was told when she purchased her house, in terms of the land being privately held, some of it being DNR held, and the likelihood that some would be built upon in the wooded area. She indicated she had ml issue Witll regard to ilie compatibility of this type of use terms of location, and the existing traffic issues along 143rd mld 14Sth Avenue. She indicated compatibility is the type of land use with a very beautiful wildlife area. She stated. there were mmlY geese an.d ducks, and other wildlife in tllis area, and she would request that some environmental studies be done, mld some additional information be provided to the Council, in terms of overall envirOlm1ental impact and , impact on the commUllity. She indicated it was her opinion that changing this land from Single Family to Multiple Fmnily zoning, at this point, does not have enough information bellind it. She . added that it does not look like a positive addition to the commUllity at tllis point. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting \ Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 40 Dave Beckman, 4172, 146th Avenue NW stated he had several items of concern. He noted an item that was brought up at the very beginning of the meeting tllat evening pel1aining to this rezoning, which was apparently being proposed because of rezoning which occurred earlier north of Oak View Middle School, that is now being addressed by being changed back to Single Family housing. He stated it sounds like the City Council and Planning COlmnission had not done their homework on that, therefore, the residents were being asked to compromise where they live, because of a mistake that was made earlier. Mr. Beckman stated he was concerned with regard to traffic within the Meadows of Round Lake. He stated there have been some serious problems with traffic coming from ih Avenue, over to Round a1 th I th rd d L ,e Boulevard from 147 down E dorado, down to 145 and 143 . He stated those roa s were not designed to handle the mnount of traffic that is going on there, as well as the speed at which that traffic is moving. He indicated it seems like the City attempted to do something about this by putting in temporary speed bumps. He stated the speed bumps were a significmlt annoyance for tlle people who lived in that area, and a few stop signs might have helped, however, this was not an issue the City desired to address. . Mr. Beckman stated that if Eldorado was extended on out to County Road 116, the traffic would significantIy increase, particularly with tlle planned developments. He stated this was an issue of concern for the residents. He pointed out there were mmlY people who walk those streets wiili their children, and there are no sidewalks, however, they enjoy walking in some relative safety, although not as safe as tlley would like. He stated any development in this area would only compromise that safety. Mr. Beckman indicated iliat when he first moved to Milmesota five yem-s earlier, he spent tlle first three montlls of his time here in the Century Court apartments in Brooklyn Park, m1d was fully aware of the type of people who live in those types of dwellings. He explained that after the three months in this location, they moved to Andover, and he had to move his family into the one apartment area in Andover, which is off of Bunker Lake Boulevm-d. He stated they had observed a drug infested area, that tlle City seriously needs to address. He stated the residents allow their children to run all the time; with no supervision, and iliis is exactly what would occur with additional apm.-unents in this area. He stated they couldn't bow to the Metropolitan Council. He indicated they were receiving noiliing in return from the Metropolitan Council on these issues. He stated iliere was no need for tllis. He indicated Andover is a City of its own, and should behave as such, with some backbone. Rosella Sonsteby, 4151 41 st A venue stated she was the owner of much of the land being discussed. She indicated the land that they are proposing to develop, they will be putting beautiful expensive homes, which will do much for the community. She advised that all of the people who claim they walk through this area are trespassing on her private property. She requested the names of all of tllese people_ ~- Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 41 Charlie Ross, 3948 l4Sth Avenue stated he was not aware if they could push Eldorado through if this proposal moves forward. He indicated they have attempted for 2 years to deal with the speeding issue that already exists on 145th Avenue. He stated in May, at 1 :00 p.m. in the morning, he had heard a car back up on his street, and walked out and looked to see that it was his neighbor who was arguing with a kid who was speeding through their neighborhood at 1:00 in the morning. He stated that as it turns out, that argument resulted in his neighbor being run over by a car, and today, he is paralyzed from the waist down. He stated he was not aware how mmlY people in the audience are aware of tllis, however, they consistently stated, every time they cmne before the City Council and discussed the speeding issue of 145tl1 Avenue, that sooner or later someone would get hurt. He stated what is interesting is that somebody did, and now iliey are talking about approving a density change to put more mld more cars through there, and increase the chmlces for these types of things to happen. He stated he thought this was ridiculous. Marilyn Phife, 4177 l46th Avenue NW in the Meadows of Round Lake stated when they built their home there, they were third home built in tile development, and had wmlted the largest quietest lot they could find for their children. She stated they moved from Brooklyn Park, where they had owned a home for five years. She stated they saw tllat home go down in value, and saw the neighborhoods deteriorate drmnatically, in a very fast period of time, for mmlY reasons. She stated , this was due to the neighborhood apartments iliat existed there. She pointed out that they were not / necessarily across the street from them, the residents were all just hanging out, with nothing to do. Mrs. Phife stated that if the Conmlission did not care about the residents' children, if they have children or grandchildren of their own that are in this area, she would request they think of them before they approve a high-rise apartment building on that corner, adjacent to Anoka High School. Mr. O'Neil stated he had never received mlY information that indicated the high-density issue, and inquired why he was hearing this for the first time, that evening. He inquired what was motivating ilie City to re-designate this land. Mr. Carlberg stated originally they had discussed a possible exchmlge with a property that was being considered. He stated this was the initial reason for looking at some of these properties. He indicated some of these properties are already zoned Multi-Family at 6 units per acre, and that was the original proposal. He stated the Council has tabled the action on that project, however, as they go through this process, they are going to deal with an issue in the Comprehensive Plan, pertaining to Multi-Family densities, affordable housing, and those types of things. He advised that the City is, by law, going to require to plan for those types of uses. He stated they could not be an exclusive Single Fmnily development City anymore. He stated it was a requirement in the Comprehensive Plans, as they get approved by the Metropolitan Council, mld in ilie original blueprintthat they must have some of these components, or they don't have an approved Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Apel stated the City did without an approved Comprehensive Plml for years. He inquired why it was so important to have it now. He stated he believed that this action for rezoning Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 42 does not come from the City Council, but rather from the staff. He stated staff was well aware of his opinion regarding staff making policy, mld if staff is doing iliis, and the City COUllCil does not circumvent tl1is, then they should be replaced. Chair Squires requested clarification regarding the Comprehensive Plan. He inquired regarding the consequences to the City for not having an approved Comprehensive Plan. Comn1issioner Apel stated the majority of the time, they have operated without an approved Comprehensive Plan, and he is tired of staff initiating applications that are against the wishes of the people. Chair Squires requested that those present conduct themselves in a courteous and professional matmer so that staff may answer his question. He stated the gentlemml earlier made the comment that the City should stand up and disregard the Metropolitatl Council. He advised that they should fmd out what the consequences of this would be, He stated the resident had raised this issue, and tlley should explore that. Mr. Carlberg stated he did not know if any COl1U1lunity had ever stated they would challenge the Metropolitan Council. He indicated this was atl issue of extension of sewer mld water, and other public infrastructure issues that may come about. He stated they might go that route, if the City Council chooses not to look at some of those Multi-Fmnily issues. He advised that it might cause the City a Senior High School. He stated they did not know that, and are working through tllose issues. He stated in terms of tlle initiation ofthese applications, as they had originally explained, this had started tlrrough tllat process. He stated this is a public heat'ing to obtain input. He indicated all of this information will go to the Council, and the Council may choose to do nothing with those properties, but at least the public has the opportunity to make comment, and have their feelings known. He stated this was what the process was all about. He stated this comment would be forwarded to the Council, or if the item is tabled at this time, staff will still forward it to the Council to get direction from them. He noted the COlmnission might also request direction froll.1 the Council in this area of specific mnendments. Mr. O'Neil stated that it just appeared that what happened in the other pat.t of the City is now affecting these residents, and if they were considering a land swap at that time, why "Were they not part of that process then, instead of now. He pointed out that if it were going to impact them, people would like to know about it immediately. He commented that with tbe traffic problems, they are now proposing to add 11igh-density bousing. He stated they all understand they are going to have to develop the City and do Multi-Family dwellings, and there is nothing wrong with that, however, it makes no sense here. John Whittok, 14427 Eldorado Street NW stated he had just rnoved in tlrree months ago, and agreed with matlY of the comments that were made. He noted the statement that the City is required by law, Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 43 and inquired whose law this was. He stated that if this is a Metropolitan Council rule, they were not elected. He stated they are not an elected body, therefore, how can they make law. Mr. Carlberg stated State law has given them the power to review Comprehensive Plan, and require their approval. Mr. Whittok stated, therefore, an appointed body is making rules for people who did not elect them. He stated there was sometl1ing very wrong with this, and this should be considered as well. He stated that they are all subject to rules, however, as a commUllity, they should be able to stand up and make decisions for themselves. He stated that if tllis pertains to taxes, and costs them a school, tlle citizens should be asked; He stated this is sometlling they all want, and they should be asked if it comes down to tax money that the Metropolitan Council is taking and not giving back. He stated he just moved in, and his lender had inquired if they were in the flood plain. He stated the City and the County had indicated that part of this property is, and part is not. He inquired how tllis proposal would affect that, and who is liable for that. He requested this be considered as well, when making their decision. He stated he was in favor of people attempting to develop their own property, and not against Mrs. Sonsteby trying to develop her lmld, but they can not just kowtow to the Metropolitan Council. He stated they should not be allowed to make decisions for the citizens, as they are not elected. Tom Insman, 1718 Andover Boulevard stated all ofthe citizens have to lmow that the City does have to have a Comprehensive Plan. He stated Maple Grove had gone through exactly the same fuing last year, and they got this cranmled down their throats, for the very sanle reason they are holding the High School as a smoking gun against their heads. He stated they have to, as citizens, stand up and say, we voted for the High School, tllese are our tax monies, and "you guys, go tal<e a jump in the lake." He indicated Ted Mondale is on tlle Metropolitan Council. He lives in North Oaks. He stated there were no high-density low income housing in NOlih Oaks. I-Ie stated in defense of Mr. Carlberg, he has a toughjob, and has to try to sell iliem on it, and he has to listen to the citizens too. Mrs. Murray stated tlle City has a choice as to where to institute their high-density housing. She suggested they put it on Bunker Lake Boulevard, where it already exists. She stated they should rezone that where it won't affect any neighborhoods, and the City can control it right from tlle start. Mr. O'Neil stated iliat if it comes down to the Metropolitan Council saying no, tlle City couldn't put any more developments in, then so be it. He stated the residents like it here the way it is, and if Andover doesn't grow any bigger, that is great, because if it grows any bigger there will be much bigger problems to deal with. He advised there is no infrastructure in the City to handle the traffic. He stated there is none. He stated the roads in town are absolutely terrible, other than ilie new Bunker Lake Boulevard. He stated tlle rest of the infrastructure is completely inadequate. He indicated he has been rear-ended in Andover due to lack of turn lanes, mld there is way too much traffic. He stated this proposal would only compoUlld iliis problem. He stated he was not anti- development, adding that he grew up in a fanlily where building was their trade, but if it means that, then they, as citizens of Andover, like it the way it is, and don't want it changed. . Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 44 Mrs. Gold stated she appreciated that the planners in Andover have a difficult job. She stated she was a planner. She stated she was not a City Plmmer, however, was aware that planners need to think in terms of cause and effect, for exmnple, if they do this, what are the consequences. She stated she was not opposed to affordable housing, but would challenge staff to look for alternative methods of affordable housing, and to be a pmt of the solution. She stated she believed the answers were there, but must be sought. She indicated she would be very concerned with high density housing, if she didn't live across the street from where it i~ being proposed, and that would be from the standpoint ofilie land itself. She stated she was not opposed to building, having also grown up in a home where building was their trade, however, when they want to put high density housing, 300 additional units, on top of a wetland and sandy environment, there is going to be an impact because the water must go somewhere. She stated she has seen this impact to Mrs. Sonsteby's property in tlle spring run off when COUllty Road 116 was put in. She stated they need to be thinking in the long term, and what moe the affects and who has to live with them, because they will all be long gone. Tom Murray, 738 41 st Avenue stated when they purchased their home, they checked wiili the City of Andover, and were ok with that. He stated looking out his fi:ont door at a townhome what quite a lot better tllan looking out at dumpsters in the back of an apartment building. I-Ie stated this would have I a significant effect on their property values. He noted the conmlent regarding keeping a courteous meeting, this should be conveyed to City staff because they are very discourteous on the telephone. Mrs. Murray stated she was not opposed to tIle building eitller, however, they should do something for the children of the community. She stated that when her parents grew up, they had a place to go that was commUl1ity and children oriented, that would be close to the High School and be a safe place for children to go instead of hanging out 'Nith people who me doing illegal activities. She stated that on her street, there is a home directly across the street. She stated there was a park in between, and that turned out to be a rental property. She stated the original owner had burned the home to fue ground, now a builder purchased it, mld did not obtain all of the permits, and now it is being rented out. She requested the Commission look at the records just for this one rental home on their street, and see how many times the Police have had to respond to that home. She stated she lives right next to park, however, her children can not even go to this park because the children that live in this home smoke marijuana. She stated this is just from one home, mld now they are proposing to put in a high rise or an apartment building. She stated this should be toned down a bit, as an apartment is not appropriate in this area, especially with the traffic they are dealing with. She stated the park adjacent to her home is not maintained, and she would like to see the City concern themselves with the parks, mld provide places for people to gather, rather than attempting to obtain the money out of an apartment building in terms of head counts for schools and whatever else they get because they have iliat type of density. Ron Hanson, 14404 Eldorado Street stated he had watched the City Council the other day, and they / had no clue that this was coming forward that evening. He indicated Council Member Ortell had stated that he was outraged that this was even being proposed, because it is illegal for staff to Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting \ Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 45 propose rezoning, therefore, it is being forced upon the City as Commissioner Apel has indicated. He stated currently between Blaine and Anoka High School, tlley are approximately 1,500 students over capacity, and when the new High School opens in Andover, it is capable of handling 1,400 students. Brad Sanford, 14392 Eldorado Street NW stated there were at least three light poles lmocked over on 143rd Avenue as a result of the speeding, adding that every night they are knocked over and put back up again. He stated Eldorado going tlrrough could not happen. He stated the lives of his two daughters are not worth the property taxes. Natalie Haas-Steffen, Representative of the Metropolitan Council stated she did not believe it was fair for her to stand tllere at that time, and allow staff and the Conunission to take all of the heat, therefore, she would like to speak to tlle residents and attempt to explain some things. She stated she had spent a number of years as Anoka County Commissioner, and after that went down to the State and was a Commissioner of Human Services, and then was on the City Council in the city of Ramsey when she requested Governor Ventura appoint her to the Metropolitml Council, with the hope tllat she could do something about the relationships between cities and the Metropolitan Council. Mrs. Haas-Steffen provided an overview of what has changed from the early years to present, and why part of the discussion was proceeding as it was that evening. She indicated the citizens who stood up and said that it is not necessary to have an approved Comprehensive Plan. She stated that it is absolutely con-ect, in that if they do not wish to take water and sewer as a City, they can probably get by without dealing with these issues, however, if they wish to take infrastructure, they will have to play by some rules that are very difficult, however, they may not be as difficult as they are being presented that evening. She stated tlle rule since 1996, when the city requests m1d extension of the MUSA line, which adds sewer, the density that the Metropolitan Council expects the city to have is 3.0 units per acre. She stated tlle Metropolitan Council does not tell the city where to put this density or how to get to that density. She indicated they will subtract out of the formula wetlands, road, setbacks, and whatever it takes to get to 3.0 units per acre. She pointed out that this does not represent high density, or high rise. Mrs. Haas-Steffen stated Witll the cost of things ~n Anoka County, in terms of land, for someone to come in and put low cost housing, when considering the amount that a piece of property is going for, the Metropolitan Council is not telling the city that they must do the low cost housing, but rather saying that ilie opportUllity should be made available, and let the market control it. S he stated this was no different than she had indicated when they sat down with the City of Andover and negotiated. She explained that what is OCCUlTing at present is that since 1996, all of tlle cities knew what the rules and the expectations were going to be, when they requested to have an extension oftheir sewer, however, like everyone else in the Metropolitan area, tlley put off getting to point where tIlis was approved, and the Metropolitan Council kept granting extensions until December th.is year. She / stated tlle City of Andover has a School Bond issue, and they need to site tile school. She stated the preferred site appears to be one that requires and extension of sewer. She stated the School Board has Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting , Minutes - February 22, 2000 . Page 46 stated that it would not site a High School on a piece of property that has no sewer, mld all of a sudden it got to crunch time. She stated that this staff and the staff that works with her has been sitting for hours, negotiating down expectations for this City. She stated tllere were some benchmarks tlrrown out by the Metropolitan Council that were somewhat unrealistic, so before all of the rumors get going, and you say that staff is laying on iliem many expectations they don't want, this staff has been negotiating down numbers and numbers. She stated they are getting down to a very reasonable requirement for the City of Andover. She stated the expectation within the new MUSA, is to have 3.0 units per acre. She stated tllat this is more than .5 acre per house. Commissioner Apel inquired if Mrs. Haas-Steffen believed the Metropolitan Council was better at extortion than planning. Mrs. Haas-Steffen stated she would suspect she has spent more time on this side of the podium, arguing with the Metropolitan Council regarding a number oftllings including land fill. She advised that every lO years, there would be a new city approxinlately the size of Maple Grove. She stated these are the expectations for what is already present, which is two thirds of the present population multiplying itself and a anotller one third is moving in, and tlley are looking for homes to put them in. She indicated that the market that has a gap in it is the Multiple Housing or rental, however, no one is telling Andover to have a high rise mld where to put it, and what they are cUlTently doing is listening to what the citizens might or might not accept. Mrs. Gold stated the issue at hand is a zoning issue, and the residents have been clear that they do not wish to rezone the property. Mr. Sanford stated Mrs. Haas-Steffen was indicating that the City is obligated to have high density housing someplace, and it is up to the Planning and Zoning Commission to decide where it best fits. He stated all of the residents present were telling them that it does not fit on ill Avenue and BUllker Lal<e Boulevard. He stated he understood that it is necessary to have the high density, however, they should put it where it makes sense. Motion by Dalien, seconded by Hedin, to close the public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment at 10:36 p.m. Motion carried on a 6-ayes, O-nays, I-absent vote. Mr. Carlberg stated ilie Commission at.iliis time, can make a reCOI1U1lendation on the Comprehensive Plan to deny the Comprehensive Plml Amendment, to not make mlY recommendation at all, or to approve. He indicated iliere was sigllificant testimony, and the may wish to consider that issue. He stated the Sketch Plan item is site specific, and they need to go through those items, and mal<e sure they forward them to the City Council. He stated that Sketch Plan carries forward because it is set by the process to go before the Council on March 6. Commissioner Apel inquired if it would be putting ilie cart before the horse to approve the Sketch / Plan if the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is not approved. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting , Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 47 Chair Squires stated he agreed, and would like to have discussion on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment first, and ilien see where that takes them, and discuss the Sketch Plan afterwards. He stated tllat there were a fair number of classifications that are proposed to approximately 150 acres, and staff has indicated that this would collectively mnount to an additional 300 lmits. Mr. Hinzman stated this was correct, on tlle western portion of this property. Cominissioner Dalien inquired if approximately 40 percent of this land was buildable. Mr. Hinzman stated this was correct. He stated the buildable area is located in the area of ih Avenue and County Road 116, and drops off into the large wetland area. He added that there was also some buildable area on the knoll to the south of Woodbine Street. He pointed out that the area between it is all wetland. COl1U11issioner Hedin inquired how many Ullits per acre could they get with Single Family spaced as closely as possible. Mr. Hinzman stated the average is approximately 2.1 units per acre, which includes streets and other items. He indicated that basically the minimum lot size is approximately .25 acres per lot. Commissioner Hedin stated therefore, they could not even get up to the 3.0 density with Single Family. Mr. Hinzman stated staff has investigated this, mld the City is fairly close to tlu"ee at this time, pursuant to the Metropolitan Cowlcil requirements. Comn1issioner Apel stated he believed this was a horrendous place to propose this type of rezoning. He added that putting high density housing on tlle peninsula in the middle of the swmnp is completely inappropriate. He stated they were talking about protecting the ecology, and taking an interest in protecting tlle wetlmlds, yet tlley are considering putting 50 housing units on tllat small peninsula of land. He stated he owns 40 plus acres, and every time they put a housing development in, he comes down to listen, and it is represented that this will not affect his property values whatsoever. He stated this was ludicrous. He stated he used to l11ink he lived on a lake, however, no that they have cut out all of the drainage areas and put ponds in, it is more like a desert.. He stated he does not care what the Engineers say, adding that he works with the Coon Creek WateTshed District all of the time, it is not what the engineers say that makes people happy, but rather it is what happens that makes people either happy or unhappy. He stated an engineer could say there is no water there because it is impossible, and yet you could be standing knee deep in water. He explain.ed that this is what would occur here. Commissioner Apel stated that if the City is really concerned about ecology, they should purchase that piece of property as a City. He stated they should ask the people what they wou.ld like to do, Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 48 and if they choose not to, tllat is their business, however, they should be given a chance. He stated they should not put 50 houses in there. Commissioner Falk inquired if the area proposed is all buildable. Mr. Carlberg stated buildability has to be assessed. He stated the Sketch Plan basically shows a concept, and ilie developer may not be able to obtain the build ability they desire, mld they are the ones who have done the investigation. He explained that as they proceed with the process and if that is the case, tI13t is the point where tlley get into tlle preliminary plat, and deal with the issues of grading and drainage of the lmld, and determine buildability from that point. He noted that at present the developer has looked at buildability to see if he can mal<e the project work, therefore, he would have to defer the Harstad Sketch Plan to the developer with regm'd to questions pertaining to buildability. COmnllssioner Dalien stated the property is currently zoned Residential Urban Single Fmnily, therefore, they could construct Single Fmnily homes on the property without mlY action at all, other than going through the process and the Sketch Plan, and determining the buildability. He stated he did not know what the resulting density would be, if it were Single Family homes, however, it would certainly be less than 50. Comn1issioner Hedin stated he was looking at what is north of the proposed rezoning, and what is located to the south of the rezoning, in Anoka. He stated he was not comfortable with the Multiple Dwelling part of the rezoning, in tllat 6 units per acre is high for the lmld located to the nOlih, south, and east. He stated as far as building on ilie peninsula, that is the second question, not the fIrst. He stated he would eitller wish to change to eliminate that Multiple Dwelling completely, as he would not want anything of that nature close to where his children are attending High School. He stated to consider moving these areas of Single Fmnily up one level he could understand, however, not moving tlle density up two levels before getting to the cOlIDllercial district on the comer of ih Avenue and Bmlker Lake Boulevard. COmnllssioner Falk inquired if City staff worked with the staff of the city of Anoka. Mr. Carlberg stated tlle present proposal is fairly recent, and staff has sent notification, and has spoken with some of the Anoka City staff recently, however, this again is tlle first step in the process. He stated the Commission heard a representative of the city of Anoka Plm1l1ing Department at iliis time, requesting additional work be done in regard to this and this is common. I-Ie stated they may not wish to proceed any further with tllis proposal, depending upon the testimony received that evening, the desires of the Council, and the Planning mld Zoning Commission's recolmnendation, therefore, they can work through those issues with the city of Anoka. Commissioner Kirchoff inquired regarding the density per acre on the property on Bunker Lake Boulevard next to the farmstead. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Comrnission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 49 Mr. Carlberg stated the density was approximately 3.75 units per acre. Chair Squires inquired if the Council were to decide to rezone Grey Oaks back to Single Fmnily, what effect that would have on tlleir overall density, in terms of meeting the Metropolitan Council requirement of 3.0 units per acre. He inquired if the current proposal were coming forward because they were attempting to find other lands to redesignate to a higher density to make up the difference. Mr. Carlberg stated staff had looked at the Grey Oaks project to determine if an exchange was necessary in order to get a Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval on that, and this is why they looked at these areas of like density, to see if they could swap or exchange. He stated it would have an impact in terms of what is existing in the City. He stated that if the Grey Oaks project goes tlrrough, and additional lands are considered, even elsewhere, they still may need those too. He stated the issue was more than simply density. He explained that it relates to affordability, rental housing, lifecycle housing, and density is only one component of the Comprehensive Plan issues that would be negotiated. He stated he was not if this area would be used to offset Grey Oaks, or if certain areas, like the Woodland Creek townhome areas could be used to achieve density, and achieve lifecycle housing. He stated that senior housing is a component of lifecycle housing that is a desirable thing in ilie City's plml for the Metropolitan Council. He stated they would have to see how the Grey Oaks project proceeds, adding tllat it would be more attractive if they could find other areas to make up those densities. Chair Squires stated from what he has heard at this meeting, as well as through other meetings that have been held with neighborhood groups, is a real concern and an opposition, not as much to the RM, 6 units per acre, but the RM-2, 13 units per acre. He stated in his personal opinion, the focus of the City should be on the RM designation, and finding places where that is appropriate, because that is much more compatible Witll Single Fmnily iliat limits it to iliings like this that are being proposed, whereas the RM-2 opens it up to developments that people view as more potentially noxious. He stated he was uncertain as to how they would accomplish this philosophical shift, however, many of the comments that he has heard, while they do not make iliat distinction per se, he believed was the point tlle citizens were attempting to make. He explained that the comments peltaining to. a high- rise, although there is not statement pertaining to a high-rise, however, tl1is is how tllis is perceived when the citizens see these tllings, and the RM-2lends itself to that concern. Chair Squires stated the Commission members all live in Andover as well, and they have many of the smne concerns about the City. He stated he was concerned regarding RM-2 developments, whether these be called high-rises or apartment buildings, mld he does not wish to see Andover compron1ised either, mld there appears to be some general consensus developing perhaps flo\\ring up to ilie City Council, that that type of a designation may not be something they wish to consider in Andover. He explained that if they can satisfy ilie Metropolitml Council concerns, by a less dense Multiple Family designation, this is something that should be closely examined. He stated people appear to be willing to accept that, as opposed to RM-2 designation, which is the reaSOfl that many of the residents are present. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting . Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 50 C011U11issioner Apel pointed out that they should not be concentrating these designations in one area. He explained that it is much more difficult to spread them out like tlle plamlers recommend to avoid situations like ghettos, and it is also harder on the neighboring property owners, however, to blindly go along and dUlnp these developments in areas like are being proposed is not con-ect. Chair Squires stated he believes there is going to be Multiple Family development in Andover, and they have seen it already. He stated they have seen this at the farmstead, and went through a meeting larger than this, when they were at the school, with the residents who were concerned. He stated they would see Multiple Family housing in Andover. He stated this is good opportunity for the Commission and tlle City Council to determine how tlley cml attempt to satisfy those people, instead of exercising jurisdiction, or holding hostage or whatever, those people who are telling them what fuey have to do in order to continue to grow and build their tax base, and yet address the concerns of the residents as well. He added that as it is proposed, this is not something he would personally support. He stated he agreed with Conunissioner Hedin's pointing out that one of the criteria they look at when considering these proposals is the compatibility with surrounding uses, and there is much residential area arOUlld the proposed property. He stated the wetland presents a unique circumstance as well, that must be factored in. He stated he could not see these comprehensive changes to this area. Commissioner Dalien concun-ed. He stated if iliey were proposing something like a farmstead he might feel somewhat differently, however, since they are not really certain as to what could be developed in this area, he was reluctant to open the doors to mlY type of high density Multiple Family units going in there. He stated he was concerned regarding enviromllental issues in tllat area, and it does not seem like the most appropriate place for this type of development, and there could be more thought put towards other areas in the City. He stated there might be more appropriate areas if this type of development is to occur in Andover. He stated he would concur with the residents in that he could not support these chmlges. COmnllssioner Kirchoff stated he agreed. He stated he believed they should look and see if fuey can spread this type of development around a bit, which may require more work, however, there may be some other areas where they could look at the RM, rather thml the RM-2. He stated the Commission recognizes the fact that this type of housing has to be made available in Andover, therefore, if they consider this from the standpoint of the six dwelling per acre or less, this might be a better means to approach tllis. He stated they should also recognize that people have land, and should have the right to use it, Ullder the zoning conditions. He stated it appears that it would take more work:. Commissioner Hedin stated ifhe was to discuss wiili staff the impact of this proposal of rezoning all of this property, other than the commercial area, RM, and if they are looking at swapping lmld for other reasons, to look elsewhere for that. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 51 Commissioner Fall( stated he thought this was a bad spot for the RM and RM-2 with the Anoka High School and the intersection in this area. He stated this would be a safety hazard, and as Commissioner Apel pointed out, it would turn ilie area into who knows, maybe a ghetto. He stated they were not certain of what was going to be there, mld it could be an eyesore. He stated he was completely in favor oflow income housing, and according to the Metropolitan Council is it going to be coming, however, he does not support the current proposal. Commissioner Apel stated he would move to forward to the City COLUlcil, a resolution recommending denial ofthe request for tlle rezoning for the following reasons: It is incompatible with the uses of the sun-ounding land. It would negatively affect the ecology of tlle area, which is primarily wetland, and the proximity to the Anoka High School is not an appropriate location for high-density housing. Motion by Apel, seconded by Hedin, to reCOl1U11end to the City Council denial of Resolution No. R -00, a resolution mnending the Comprehensive Land Use Plml for the City of Andover on property owned by Rosella Sonsteby and Arlda (Milmegasco) located in Sections 29 and 30. Motion carried on a 6-ayes, O-nays, I-absent vote. Mr. Carlberg indicated tlle Harstad Sketch Plan would go forward to the City Council for discussion. He stated tl1ey were not considering high-density use in this area, but rather the RM, which is 6 units per acre. He stated tl1is would still take a Comprehensive Plml Amendment to proceed Witll this, however, the Commission could determine if that design or development fits tbat area, and if the develop should proceed with tllat, and the Commission cml make a recommendation to forward to the City Council in this regard. COl1U1lissioner Apel requested clarification that this item would have to come back before the Planning mld Zoning Commission, and there would have to be another Comprehensive Plan Amendment in order for this to proceed. Mr. Carlberg stated this was COITect. Chair Squires stated that it is theoretically possible that the City Council could accept the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, therefore, if any of the Commissioners have concerns with regard to ilie proposed Sketch Plml, they should be expressed at this time. Conunissioner Ape! stated tl1is was a bad place to develop that many units. Commissioner Hedin agreed. Chair Squires stated this item would be considered at the March 6, 2000, City Council meeting. He / indicated tllat there would be another meeting, and the Commission is advisory, and the Council Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting , Minutes - February 22, 2000 Page 52 makes tlle final decision. He stated on March 6, the Council would consider the presentation, the Sketch Plan, mld tlle Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Mr. Carlberg stated the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is going forward to the City Council with a recommendation of denial, however, the Sketch Plan is still being reviewed, and comments will be made by the Council at the March 6 meeting. At this time, Chair Squires called a brief recess. The Plmming and Zoning Commission reconvened at 11 :05 p.m. PRESENTATION: SKETCH PLAN - DA VE HARRIS Mr. Carlberg provided tlle Commission with a location map, which indicated the general location of the proposed project. He indicated the property is located on the southeast corner of Crosstown Boulevard mld 138ili Avenue, and is a vacant parcel. Dave Harris, of Dave Harris Development stated he is proposing to constmct two four-unit, owner occupied townhomes on the parcel indicated on the location map. He stated he has discussed this proposal with City staff, and has gone through the requirements necessmy to effect this type of development, in terms of the setback requirements. He explained that the RM-2 requires 5,000 square feet per Ullit, which is met. He stated the units are required to have a minimUlTI of 960 square feet, and presently, their plan shows a little more than 1,300 square feet, and within these units, they .are proposing to put basements. He stated they are covering two items with this proposal with regard to affordable housing, as well as a very attractive complex to be sited on that location. Mr. Harris stated adj acent to and SOUtll of the proposed site is a commercial piece of property. He explained that the general area is comprised of Multiple Housing developments. COl1U11issioner Kirchoff inquired if the proposed proj ect would be regulated by ml Asso ciation. Mr. Harris stated tI1is was conect. Comnlissioner Dalien inquired regarding the price range for the apartment units. Mr. Han"is stated at this time, they believe it would be approximately $l40,000 for the base units, with upgrades available. Commissioner Falk inquired if there was sufficient room for parking. ) Mr. Harris stated the project meets the parking requirements of the ordinance, which includes extra parking stalls, otller thml those tIlat are owner-occupied. He stated the ordinance requires Y, space CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNJNG COMMISSION ACTION February 22, 2000 DATE AGENDA ITEM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR 10. Public Hearing: - Sketch Plan Community Development AGENDA Harstad Townhome Development David 1. Carlberg Harstad Companies Community Development Director BY: BY: Request The Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to review, comment and hold a public hearing on the proposed sketch plan of the Harstad Townhome Development as being proposed by Harstad Companies on the property located in Sections 29 & 30 as shown on the attached location map. General Comments * The proposed sketch plan is located in an R-4, Single Family Urban Zoning District. , The property will most likely develop as a Planned Unit Development. A Special Use Permit will need to be granted to allow the development as a PUD. * A Comprehensive Plan Amendment is being proposed for the site to change the land use designation from RU, Residential Urban Single Family to RM, Residential Medium Density. * The proposed development consists of fifty (50) townhome units and two (2) single family lots. * The property is currently located in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and . was scheduled to develop in the 1995-2000 time frame, The property will be required to be developed in accordance with the Andover Development Policy Guideline. * All lots shall be required to meet the provisions of Ordinance No.lO, Section 9.06a(l) which relates to lot size and buildability requirements. * The Water Resource Management Plan shall be implemented with the development. * The 100 year pond elevation shall be identified on the preliminary plat. In addition , drainage and utility easements are required for the 100 year flood elevations. Flood fringe , and floodway boundaries shall be indicated on preliminary plat. Page Two Sketch Plan - Harstad Townhome Development Harstad Companies Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting February 22,2000 * The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary permits (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Lower Rum River Watershed Organization, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, LGU and any other agency that may have an interest in the site). * There are wetlands within the proposed development that must be delineated by agencies and indicated on the preliminary plat. The Local Government Unit is the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization (LRRWMO). The developer shall contact the LRRWMO to discuss the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act that is in effect. The LRRWMO uses the Anoka Conservation District (ACD) to verifY wetland delineations. / * The developer is required to meet the following City Ordinances and all other applicable ordinances: Ordinance No.8, Zoning Ordinance Ordinance No. 10, Platting and Subdividing Ordinance . Ordinance No. 107, Flood Plain Ordinance Ordinance No. 112, Planned Unit Developments Ordinance No. 114, Wetland Buffer Ordinance Ordinance No. 214, Diseased Shade Tree Ord. & Tree Preservation Policy Park and Recreation Commission Comments The Commission will be reviewing the sketch plan at their March 2, 2000 meeting. The Commission will be discussing and making a recommendation on the park dedication requirements per Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07. , I , Page Three Sketch Plan - Harstad Townhome Development Harstad Companies Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting February 22,2000 Andover Review Committee (ARC) Comments The Andover Review Committee (ARC) met on Thursday, February 10,2000 to discuss the sketch plan. Comments from the meeting are as follows: 1. The proposed street from Bunker Lake Blvd. NW to Woodbine Street NW and up to 143rd Avenue NW is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) Street. The City Council will need to determine if the MSA street is to be built or to remove the designation. The reason(s) this street section was designated MSA was to provide an additional and easier access from the neighborhood to Bunker Lake Blvd. NW. 2. Ifthe street is constructed as an MSA street, discussion is needed by the City as to the potential for an on-street bike route. The City has planned for a regional bikeway/walkway trail along Bunker Lake Blvd. NW. An on-street bike route would provide for a safe route for bike traffic from the neighborhoods in the area to the future Bunker Lake trail. The minimum MSA street width with a bike route is thirty-five (35') feet. 3. Are there development plans for the area labeled as Upland I? 4. The ARC recommends the proposed private street be public. 5. A variance maybe needed for the length of cul-de-sac street if developed as proposed, as the length exceeds the 500' maximum requirement. It should be noted that some of the above listed items will need to be addressed as a part of the sketch plan review and some of the items will need to be addressed as a part of the preliminary plat application and review. The ARC is listing these items at this time for discussion purposes. The Planning and Zoning Commission should remember that this item has not been studied , by staff in detail as most of the detail will be reviewed as a part of the preliminary plat. -- @ City of Harstad Townhome / Andover Sketch Plan ~:~~~ <~ l-~ J it] ~ ~ / -r---.--,-.. ~Ji'< ~rm m -1 ---- --:::-- . f\!)' f" -.. r ~-- v ----.L r--'< I l__ ~ 1__ *. .r ~ -/1 '" A _, "'" ,_I~'_ r- , Y'-'4499 !R i R ...).... :!! ~ _. I~'_ '''13 ~~lj(L..?,Jl. ~~ il \::"\ ~ ~r-,~ ... :;;;- ~"::. ~ 1 - "BO' t''; I~'~' 144 ............. - 14461/) ~oo T. ~91: .' v' ~ ,_J~"':'::':'IIl-~!!.r t<C.521 L~ '~ I UiA~ ~ 311"'N }{3Q, ,;" -- "',-" _13........ _ B~ r;:;; '_ ,-----;;;;;, t4.tSl /~'" .~~.......... 1'\ 3 9 r~ - WL...:......"':":=< we--- E C:::" T :..3~, ~_.:--,... r.-. 449 I ' ...;._ ~r:.;- ,... !Z ~ ,... a~ = ... & ~ r=- fJ! "'" ~ ~- ~'9: .". ~ ~ --'-gF=' ~!",'~<" '" =-"= ~ ~ 14; 9 7. ;1..... .... -- o~ ~ ... -- ----,: ~ := 345 3 __ ~I,....' I-- . ,.." ~ . "" ~/iJ ~ ~~ - ,- ~c::=: ,- -I:A\<; 344 '" ~ ~~~ II ,.." ~ .'~""r . 'VI' ~t; - ,- .==- - ,- ,_ ',.., ",. ~~~r=. 1\ >,\A ,_ 0( 14411 ~ - ~1 ~92 ~ _! ~'P\ =!'_'_ ~~ .... .a. ,_.:- I 14410 ~- -,,".... 0 ~'!.'- I =. ~ "38' [3'" .......: 1...,- [- ~,,9 1445014451, "'-'-...........:..... 3155 3737 lGlO - """3619 ....., ......,,~ .,<?' v.: ~AV -"''''''''" "" i ~' /; f ::;'",r/..k '"'."''' '40 372' ~ i '-"08 I "'" . V r {- -..........., 1'1 4288'- - ,_ I- - - 0 <e; "J~ ~ if V ... . ::~.' "i: :: :~~ ~ ~ '"'' ~ 11th, ~pproximateLoca~ .' .~r---- ~; ::~~-3"2&7 n~~I~~~"~ ~ ~ .:r;~~'lr;: "'P<>y ~~""'lllliil~11 ,cis ' I ~ l/R " ",_.u 1',-/1 !........-f""'-~f""'- \ -"". ..~a~~ ~'" '\S~~~~;\>;f;;~,.".%~.::il~ ~. j-/ '" )f:>"" ~~,t:- ._Ial._ ,~. - ,- 'II"" I,m -- 142 ;.l a:: \ , 42 AVE 142NDAVE _ ~ 1411;- / BUNKER):AI<,E BLVD ~ k. ... {,~.(,~/ It- i i i I i I I I I I ~ ! - 12 v ~~ '/""/'"4'''40 "... "''' x.... "'........................... ,... -,..., _, "'-... ....;z.....,.-a.... "'N< I, I'~ - '~36~691! i i ~...:g:g:g:ll ~ ~ ~ ~ is ...a "'lS! 1~ '-/ _~1~ '\ - ~)-{. 141STAVE "'30 ~. ..,. .. .. .... ~ '" 1=! a = 4133 ---4l ~ '\:. ( . r ~/~I! Ii,,,, ~ :. : : i ~ ~ ilk ~ :: P.i;; / S\40"\ ! 'jj,-, A;J\ lilli ",.. ~ E ~ ~ ~~,; :;; ~ ./ 140'" r ~ "'" F'- 140" - -:-- . . ---r\ ~ \,;;, t- ~ ! !\""~ ~ "'" = '-,- ,- \~h ~ ~,jg&~ t~-~. ~ '"'' ~~;;< ~ il~ ~I!~~. 1 -==:.. ~...~\ 4n ct~~~ 0......." 0'( ~ =- =~ t~'lill11l i ir- . ,~f~ ~ ~ = ~e'13l ;r.;t; A';;;;;_ - ~I--..-. "'.. ~I~I~~~-.J~~ .....~ ~~139 J466~ r--~'-' ~1"'" 111:=1 -=- "fl I......,"""" ~ 13973.-. liiITll'" ... ... _... ~.... .... o r--1---~1 '''';; _ I: ......~...... :-__~ '40 V ~ ~~ U) :!:\ i g ~ 8 ~ GI ~ II> ... ... t1 a... ......- 0 ","lO! X;:!;... ~ ~ aM, -:... ... _ aII!Il ...... <:Jnl """'"' ..... CD.........,.. ~;! ~ ~;:: Cf1 _ I- <O-=1~=I=~~ -"""-~I~I~]UI~\''e-L- r-Z ~ "'THLN .E:; - r ;:~ :;;;~" ~ i1i Sill " "g/! ml!III!I~I! I as ~ 5 J<.16 II ~ ~ ~ s~~=_- {lli' : C 13l1l;I '" ~l:" ~I:" .., :"::'- DC 13913 ... ~.... ............ '" _ ... : 13 39THLN '-' >>l ~ &1 ;;; ~ Cf1... 0(>:: ...... ~~.i\lllllllil~~BBli\!II!li!li ~~ """~~~mS)"':;;;oilr 4 ~ PI '39TH-,WE _ ~ -== ~ L E G END .:.>.t 1; i\'L.. N Sources: ! ~ '-, L fA. Andover Engineering AI Subject Properl:t . '"'- j:. Andover GIS / 1\/ Street Center Lines -+- Anoka County GIS SoIl Suitability , .. - < B=. I ~ite.Lo~~!io~,; '""ll.:~ ~ 1 inch = 990 feet RF.IIJ.883 Map Date: February 18,2000 ,- -, -"" .'-,,' '.- . ~.NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING . " . . . . ..... 'Tl1e'.Pl~nirig~dZoni~gCorii~issioIl'oqhe Cityof~dover~iiihblcl'a.pubiiC.' , . ,hearing ai7:00p.m:,or as soon there~fter>as.canbe heard; onTuesday,Febru1lrY.." . ~ -. -: . '. ",- , -,' .: - -., .. ,,- ,," " '..' " . '_ :,' .. ~ ' , -' ,,-',: '.' ,; : - - .-' - - "', - .. , , .', : - '- : _'.' ,-, _: - -''': __ I ' 22, 2000.aftheAndover City Hall; 1685 Crosstown Boulevaid NW, Ati.dover~.. , ' .," -":- , --' ... "-", -, . : - - '. - -., . , :_'~ -:. .- - .""- ' .- ' '" -, '-, . _.,;' - -- ,. ;':, ','- " J~.1innesota to considedhesket~h plan submitted .by Harst!1d. Comp~niesc(msisting;>. of two (2) single family urban iesidentiallotsandfift)r: (50)twinhomeunitslocated ,in'Se~tibns 29& 30; T Qwnship 32,'Range:2.4,'AnokaColll1ty,Minnesota:The',',. '. . propertY is generallyi8cated north bfBuuker.Lake Blv& NW'(CountYRoad NQ.;; '., .' ... 1 16) and' south and..yesfofilie AndoyerBoUndary.CoIl1ri1ission PlatNo.tarid ....."" ; Rossella'sAdditiol1. The property is legaJly describedasfollc)\ys:'. . -' '.. " . ',' '" .' .- . -, ,,-' . "- . . '~ -.,; . . '.- ", PIN 293224340045 PIN 293224310094 NORMAN AND MARY TYSON PAUL AND ELIZABETH BLESI 14248 UNDERCLIFT STREET NW 3648 143RD AVENUE NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224340044 PIN 293224310152 ST DENNIS PATRlCKAND MICHELLE CLARA LEFEBVRE 14258 UNDERCLIFT STREET NW 14278 ill\TDERCLIFT STREET NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224310151 PIN 293224340018 RANDALL AND DEBRA BAILEY MARK AND DAWN YOUNGREN 14268 UNDERCLIFT STREET NW 14260 VINTAGE STEETNW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224340019 PIN 293224340020 JEFF HASSEL THOMAS AND JULIE OLEJAR 14252 VINTAGE STREETNW 14244 VINTAGE STREETNW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224340021 PIN 293224340022 MURPHY S C AND EDWARDSON L J ROBERT KORAN 14236 VINTAGE STREETNW 14228 VINTAGE STREET NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224340023 PIN 293224340024 PAUL AND SUSAN LARSON DOUG AND SUSAN RISING 14220 VINTAGE STREET NW 14212 VINTAGE STREETNW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224340009 PIN 293224340030 BASTIAN W M AND LLEWELLYN K M PAM FORCIER 14259 VINTAGE STREETNW 14249 VINTAGE STREETNW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224340031 PIN 293224340032 LEONARD AND THERESA HUBBARD PHILIP AND SUSAN KROCHALK 14239 VINTAGE STREETNW 14227 VINTAGE STREET NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224340033 PIN 293224340034 MICHAEL AND LILLIAN PEARSON. JOHN AND BETTY KlHLGREN 14217 VINTAGE STREETNW 14207 VINTAGE STREETNW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224310100 PIN 293224310101 REBECCA BUCHANAN DON AND CHERYL BRIDGES 3720 143RD AVENUE NW 14288 VINTAGE STREET NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224310055 PIN 293224310056 HARRIS MICHAEL AND M B SCOTT ADKISSON 14278 VINTAGE STREET NW 14268 VINTAGE STREET NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224310099 PIN 293224310096 RANDY BROSDAHL ROBERT HASLIP AND S L 14299 VINTAGE STREET NW 14269 VINTAGE STREETNW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 555304 PIN 293224310097 PIN 293224310098 BOYD ROOD AND DONNA FLYNN STEPHEN AND LINDA SEXTON 14279 VINTAGE STREET NW 14289 VINTAGE STREETNW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224310102 PIN 293224310067 HARRY AND RUTH MOBERG REINHARDT DENNIS M AND M 14289 WOODBINE STREET NW 14279 WOODBINE STREET NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224310153 PIN 293224320011 BOILEAU SW AND JOHNSON M L ROSELLA SONSTEBY 14269 WOODBINE STREET NW 4151 141ST AVENUE NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANOKA, MN 55304 PIN 293224320029 PIN 293224320030 PATRICK ONEILL RICHARD AND KIM PESCHONG 14330 YUCCA STREET NW 3870 143RD AVENUE NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224320031 PIN 293224320032 PATRICIA JOST JOHN AND MICHELLE MONSON 3858 143RD AVENUE NW 3846 143RD AVENUE NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224320033 PIN 293224320034 JERRY AND LESLIE PAVEL MIKE AND KERRY BUNKERS 3834 143RD AVENUE NW 3822143RDAVENUENW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224320035 PIN 293224310103 CAROL MUELLER WADE AND KRIST A DORCAS 3810 143RD AVENUE NW 14298 WOODBINE STREETNW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224310104 PIN 293224310105 GUNDERSON L D & STACKPOOL A M DAVID SROKA 14288 WOODBINE STREETNW 14278 WOODBINE STREET NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 293224310106 PIN 293224310065 ROBERT AND JANICE MANARY TOM MINNIHAN & L WITSOE 14268 WOODBINE STREETNW 3740 143RD AVENUE NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: May 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Community Development ITEM NO. David L. Carlberg a. Community Development Director Sketch Plan - Chesterton Commons North Second Addition - Section 14 Ashford Development The City Council is requested to review and comment on the sketch plan of Chesterton Commons North Second Addition located in Section 14 as being proposed by Ashford Development. The sketch plan consists of39 single family urban lots on 14.04 acres. Planning and Zoning Commission Review The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the sketch plan on April 11, 2000. The Commission generally agreed with the recommendations and comments from the Andover Review Committee. The two main concerns of the Commission were the MSA street designation from 161st Avenue NW to Crosstown Blvd. NW, and the coordination of the streets with existing and proposed developments in the area of this development. Attached is the staff report presented to the Commission for background information. Also attached is the minutes from the meeting. Park and Recreation Commission Review The Park and Recreation Commission. reviewed the sketch plan at their April 20, 2000 meeting. The Commission is recommending the acceptance of cash in lieu of land. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - Aprilll, 2000 Page 6 Mr. WindschitI stated there has been reference to an agreement that this land uld be used for senior housing. Commissioner Apel stated this agreement was not in .. g but it was thoroughly implied. Commissioner Dalien agreed with the other Co . sioners and stated tI1is site was to be used for senior housing. He indicated the propos etch plan does not meet tIle density or use of the original plan. Commissioner Dali supported that the Planning Commission recommend the Council deny this project base n density, lack oflot configuration and excessive variance requests ment. ted iliis item would be considered by the City Council on May 2, 2000. PRESENTATION: CHESTERTON COMMONS NORTH 2ND ADDITION - 39 SINGLE FAMILY URBAN LOTS SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14 - PRESENTATION BY ASHFORD DEVELOPMENT. / Community Development Director Dave Carlberg called on a representative of Ashford Development to present the proposed sketch plan for Chesterton Commons North Second Addition located in Section 14 as presented by Ashford Development. Jerry Windschitl reviewed ilie 39 lots within the Chesterton Commons North 2nd Addition Development. He explained there would be no variances required within this development and stated tlle Road Committee would be meeting to discuss the local County Road adj acent to this development. Mr. Windsc11itl indicated the alignment of 156th Lane was a concern at this time. He explained the proposed alignment by Staff may run through to a house on the east side of the proposed development. He stated 156th Lane would also have a long straight stretch of roadway. which could pose a speed concern. PUBLIC HEARING: CHESTERTON COMMONS NORTH 2ND ADDITION - 39 SINGLE FAMILY URBAN LOTS ~ SW 1/4 OF SECTION 14 - ASHFORD DEVELOPMENT. Conmmnity Development Director Dave Carlberg stated the Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to review the proposed sketch plan of Chesterton Commons North Second Addition located in Section 14 as presented by Ashford Development. He presented an overview of the proposed development and explained that tIle development calls for 39 units on 14.04 acres and is cmrentIy zoned R-l. Mr. Carlberg stated the property would have to be rezoned to R-4, Single Fmllily Urban with a minimum lot size of 11,400 square feet. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April!!, 2000 Page 7 Mr. Carlberg noted the proposed sketch plan is consistent with the Andover Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan and is designated as RU, Residential Urban Single Family and is located in the MUSA (2000-2005 time franle). He indicated the property would be required to develop in accordance with the Development Policy Guideline. All lots shall be required to meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.06a(1), which relates to buildability requirements. In addition, the front 100 feet of each lot must be buildable which is a stmldm'd the City uses for lots developed with municipal sewer and water. Mr. Carlberg explained the Water Resource Management Plan should be implemented with the. development. He mentioned the 1, 10 & 100-year flood elevations shall be identified on the preliminary plat. In addition drainage and utility easements are required for the 100-year flood elevations. Mr. Carlberg stated the developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary pennits (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S, Army Corp of Engineers, Coon Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, LGU and any other agency that may have an interest in the site). Initial contact shall be made with ilie City Engineering Dep31im.ent regarding this item. All wetlands within ilie proposed development must be delineated by agencies and indicated on the preliminary plat. The Local Government Unit (LGU) is ilie Coon Creek Watershed District (CCWD) who will need to verify the wetland delineation. The developer shall contact tlle CCWD to discuss the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act that is in effect. Mr. Carlberg explained the developer would be responsible for meeting several applicable ordinances within tlle City. Mr. Carlberg explained the Park COI1U11ission would be reviewing the sketch plan at their April 20, 2000 meeting. He noted the Andover Review Committee (ARC) met on Tuesday, March 28, 2000 to discuss ilie sketch plan. Comments from the meeting are as follows: although the developer has sketched adjacent l31lds as to how they could be developed. Additional sketcl1ing of adjacent 131lds may be necessary by the developer as provided in Ordinance 10, Section 6.04. Coordination is needed between developers developing adjacent lands in the vicinity. Additionally, the ARC recommends 160th Avenue NW be extended to the east and tlle intersection with Crane Street NW be a "T" intersection. Mr. Carlberg explained they stated a Municipal State Aid road designation exists in the area of the plml from 161st Avenue NW (County Road No. 20) to Crosstown Blvd. NW (COUllty Road No. 18). He mentioned that the proposed Crmle Street NW and the road sketched to the east accessing onto 161st Avenue NW do not"meet ilie (:i60' separation requirement as provided in Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.02C. A trail is planned along 161st Avenue NW (Co. Rd. 20) 3lld that internal sidewalks and trails need to be discussed mld iliat a neighborhood park may be needed to serve this area which needs evaluation by the Park ConU11ission. It should be noted that some of the above listed items will need to be addressed as a part of the sketch plan review and some of the items will need to be addressed as a part of the preliminary plat application and review. He stated the ARC is listing these items at this time for discussion purposes. / Mr. Carlberg stated there is a need for coordination between the proposed roadways. and the surrounding developments to connect streets throughout the sites. He explained a cul-de-sac could Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - Aprilll, 2000 J Page 8 be proposed within the property to tlle east ofthe proposed site to bend the roadway and allow it to connect to easterly developments. Mr. Carlberg indicated tllis should eliminate the speed concern. Commissioner Daninger questioned how parks would be placed within the developments. Mr. Carlberg stated the Park Commission would like to see something centrally located within the development. Motion by Daninger, seconded by Dalien, to open the public hearing at 8:14 p.m. Motion carried on a 7-ayes, O-nays, O-absent vote. Mr. Windschitl reiterated that within the general comments on the staff report the proposed sketch is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. He noted iliis should be changed witl1in the staff comments. Mr. Carlberg stated this was correct. There was no other public input. Motion by Kirchoff, seconded by Dalien, to close the public hearing at 8:15 p.m. Motion carried on a 7-ayes, O-nays, O-absent vote. Conunissioner Kirchoff encouraged tl1e coordination of the streets tlrroughout the new developments. He asked if the park dedication would also be coordinated. Mr. Carlberg stated if lmld was not desired for this development, cash could be obtained from the developer for the Park Board to use as they see fit. Commissioner Daninger stated the roadways should be addressed. Commissioner Apel concurred and encouraged the developer to work with the cun-ent developments. Mr. Carlberg stated this would be done throughout the preliminary and final plat approval. Chair Squires stated the north-south roadway should be determined quickly before the developer is allowed to proceed. He explained the COlmnission recommends ilie Council approve Chesterton Commons North 2nd Addition as proposed and encouraged the coordination of the roadways with existing developments. Mr. Carlberg stated this would be considered by the City Council on May 2, 2000. PUBLIC HEARING: LOT SPLITW ARIANCE (LS 00-06) - SPLIT THE SOUTHERt'l" +/- 2.5 ACRES FROM A 5-ACRE PARCEL AND VARIANCE TO ORDINANCE 8, SECTION 6.02 (LOT WIDTH AT FRONT SETBACK) - 16390 V ALLEY DRIVE - MARVIN TOBECK. City Plmmer Jolm Hinzman stated tlle Planning C0l1U11ission is requested to review the lot split and J varimlce request of Marvin Tobeck on property located at 16390 Valley Drive NW. The applicant proposes to split approximately 2.5 acres from a +/- 5-acre parcel and vary +/- 24 feet from the 300- CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE April 11 , 2000 AGENDA ITEM ORIGINA TING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR AGENDA 6. Public Hearing: Sketch Plan Community Development Chesterton Commons North 2r d David 1. Carlberg Ashford Development BY: Community Development Director BY: ReQuest The Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to review the proposed sketch plan of Chesterton Commons North Second Addition located in Section 14 as presented by Ashford Development. General Comments * The proposed sketch plan consists of39 single family urban residential lots on / 14.04 acres. '* The proposed sketch plan is located in an R-I, Single Family Rural Zoning District. The property will need to be rezoned to R-4, Single Family Urban. In an R-4 District, the minimum lot size is 11,400 square feet. * The proposed sketch plan is consistent with the Andover Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan and is designated, RU, Residential Urban Single Family and is located in the MUSA (2000-2005 time frame). * The property will be required to develop in accordance with the Development Policy Guideline. * All lots shall be required to meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.06a(l) which relates to buildability requirements. In addition, the front 100 feet of each lot must be buildable which is a standard the City uses for lots developed with municipal sewer and water. , Page Two Sketch Plan - Chesterton Commons North Second Addition Section 14 Ashford Development Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 * The Water Resource Management Plan shall be implemented with the development. * The 1, 10 & 100 year flood elevations shall be identified on the preliminary plat. In addition drainage and utility easements are required for the 100 year flood elevations. * The developer and/or owner is responsible to obtain all necessary permits (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Coon Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, LGU and any / other agency that may have an interest in the site). Initial contact shall be made with the City Engineering Department regarding this item. * Wetlands within the proposed development must be delineated by agencies and indicated on the preliminary plat. The Local Government Unit (LGU) is the Coon Creek Watershed District (CCWD) who will need to verify the wetland delineation. The developer shall contact the CCWD to discuss the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act that is in effect. * The developer is required to meet the following City Ordinances and all other applicable ordinances: \ Ordinance No.8, the Zoning Ordinance Ordinance No. 10, the Platting and Subdividing Ordinance Ordinance No. 114, Wetland Buffer Ordinance Ordinance No. 214, Diseased Shade Tree Ord. & Tree Preservation Policy Park and Recreation Commission Review The Commission will be reviewing the sketch plan at their April 20, 2000 meeting. I Page Three Sketch Plan - Chesterton Commons North Second Addition Section 14 Ashford Development Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Andover Review Committee Comments The Andover Review Committee (ARC) met on Tuesday, March 28, 2000 to discuss the sketch plan. Comments from the meeting are as follows: * Although the developer has sketched adjacent lands as to how they could be developed. Additional sketching of adjacent lands may be necessary by the developer as provided in Ordinance 10, Section 6.04. Coordination is needed between developers developing adjacent lands in the vicinity. * The ARC recommends 160th Avenue NW be extended to the east and the intersection with Crane Street NW be a "T" intersection. * A Municipal State Aid road designation exists in the area of the plan from 161st Avenue NW (County Road No. 20) to Crosstown Blvd. NW (County Road No. 18). * Proposed Crane Street NW and the road sketched to the east accessing onto 161st Avenue NW do not meet the 660' separation requirement as provided in Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.02C. * A trail is planned along 161st Avenue NW (Co. RD. 20). Internal sidewalks and trails need to be discussed. * Neighborhood park may be needed to serve this area. Park Commission will need to evaluate. Page Four Sketch Plan - Chesterton Commons North Second Addition Section 14 Ashford Development Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 It should be noted that some of the above listed items will need to be addressed as a part of the sketch plan review and some of the items will need to be addressed as a part of the preliminary plat application and review. The ARC is listing these items at this time for discussion purposes. The Planning and Zoning Commission should remember that this item has not been studied by staff in detail as most of the detail will be reviewed as a part ofthe preliminary plat. \...--"c~tI.' ,..... ........,. .......~ 'VVf"~''''' i:t.l.(;.......,. 1VTl PIN 143224230009.0 PIN 143224320006.0 PIN 143224230008.0 EMMERICH LAWRENCE F & KAREN THEIS ALLAN R & THERESA A SWISHER JOHN C & HEIDI A 1<41161 ST AVE OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT ,DOVER, MN 55304 15941 HANSON BLVD 1433 161ST AVE ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 143224230004.0 PIN 143224330049.0 PIN 143224320011.0 OLMSCHEID STEVEN A & CHERYL A ASHFORD DEVEL CORP INC TIBBETTS MARK R OR CURRENT RESIDENT 3640 152NDLANE OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1487161ST AVE ANDOVER, MN 55304 1444 161ST AVE ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 143224320009.0 PIN 143224310003.0 PIN 143224310001.0 BOYER DOUGLAS J & JANET L PETERSON DONALD H LASInNSKI JAMES M & JANET L OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1422 161ST AVE 1374 161ST AVE 1326 161ST AVE ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 TH CONSTRUCTION FENNA HOMES REMAX 617 E MAIN ST MERLE EIDE SUITE 1 13631 BALSAM LN 299 COON RAPIDS BLVD NW ANOKA, MN 55303 DAYTON, MN 55327 COON RAPIDS, MN 55433 COUNSELOR REALTY COUNSELOR REALTY JULIE SWENSON CENTURY 21 BORDEN 13601 80TH CIR N STEVE SWENSON JIM BORDEN 13601 80TH CIR N MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 2437 COON RAPIDS BLVD NW COON RAPIDS, MN 55433 SW WOLD CONSTRUCTION 901 W HWY 10 SUITE 10 ANOKA, MN 55303 : ~ City of Chesterton Commons North 2nd Add. Andover Sketch Plan ~ o 16289 en z <( :c 16231 1657 16157 1341 1101 11n 161ST AVE 1292 1092 1761 ~88 "' :& '" "' ~ ., _ 5 ._. LEG END N Sources: A Andover Planning O 350' Mailing Boundary Andover GIS Anoka County GIS r;.::'j Properties Notified Site Location N Subject Property .'~--'~~'''''-''-';. 1 inch - 990 feet RF .1:11,883 Map Date: March 27, 2000 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION DATE: May 2, 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Planning ITEM NO. Compo Plan Amendment John Hinzman Land Use Change RM to RU City Planner NE \4 of Section 22 2;, City of Andover Request The City Council is requested to review an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to change the land use district designation from RM, Residential Medium Density to RU, Residential Urban Single Family. The proposed 60 acre site is owned by Grey Oaks, Inc. and is located in the NE \4 of Section 22, north ofthe FOX HOLLOW SUBDIVISION, between Nightingale Street and Hanson Blvd. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment is submitted in conjunction with a rezoning to R-4, Single Family Urban. Back~round . January 25, 2000 - The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 (1 absent) to recommend approval of the change. The Commission discussed the Grey Oaks project and recommended approval of the change to allow the City Council the opportunity to change the land use if the plat conditions were not met. . February 1,2000 - The City Council granted a 60-day extension (April 30th expiration) to the Preliminary Plat of Grey Oaks. . February 15,2000 - The City Council tabled the item to the last meeting in April, upon approval of the Grey Oaks Preliminary Plat extension. . April 18, 2000 - During Mayor\Council input, the City Council requested the item be placed on the May 2,2000 meeting if the Preliminary Plat for Grey Oaks expires. . Additional background information on Grey Oaks is included in the January 25, 2000 Planning and Zoning Staff Report. Metropolitan Council Review Metropolitan Council has indicated that any mnendment to Comprehensive Plan cannot negatively affect the housing and density goals recently adopted by the City Council. If Page Two Comprehensive Plan Amendment NE Y4 Section 22 May 2, 2000 ! the multiple family designation is removed from tlle subject property, additional property may need to be designated multiple fmnily development in order to gain Met Council Approval. Attachments . Resolution for Approval . Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - January 25, 2000 . Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report - January 25, 2000 , ' . . ". t; ',-:- ,; Comm.is~iorieispreseni:' (', .' ,,"- - -,", " . ,,' ., ayes~O-nays; 1 ~abseI1t vote., . -~. ," .', .' '.'_'" <0' ,'"' '. ...PT!i~i,CHEARING:COMPREH~NSIVEP.IAN:.AMENDM.E:NT(CJ>A-:00I-01!,-:-,l}E-GUIDE ., ,.. ,...,'LANDFROMRM; TO RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITYTO RrJ,RESIDENTIALURBAN '::sjNGLEFXMILY~GREYOAKS; SECTjON23~'CiTYOFANDOVER.' ..., ..... .,' j . " ,. ,. " ," ~. , . '~ . .. ~ -' ',-'-,:. . '.- . ' - - . . ,- - ',{ ",. "',' ';-' ," -, . ,- , '- .' .', . -'. - - -' . :'::, ,PUBLIc: lfEARff.lG::REZONING(REl 00-01). '-, I?EZPN.E'L1ND FROAf M.-2,M~TIPLIf' . DWELLING TO R';4,.SINGLEFAMILYURBAN -,(iREYOAKS,SECTION 23. . ". . ""-,. .' ..' ," .- _'. .' ".' " _', -',. :;:. _'.- , . -. : ~:' _, -' .',." " . '. .,.' .., -. .:. \. "'. -.' ""': . - ',. - .__. ,c':, - _' -. " _ .,".'.'. - ,':'_ .' . ,: ~ :: .._", .' \"' . ' . _'., _, . ^ . I ,- ._..~.~-'--',~'.-':.,--:-:.'..:- -::"--:,-'-":':)-\'.-".,'-",' .:.-,;<>-'..:.:....'.:':.',-.--</ ";:"--'''_''':~'-;:''':'' ......:':'-'.: '~."~, ':':"':'::,:,,-,,--:.>-..,:< : ""-"-'~;,' -" .,-"-"..,\:'",> Mi. HinZl11all requested Items 3: and,. 4,~heConipreheiisive' Plan Ainendmeni, and Rezol1ing;pe ,combined for consideration, as these ite~s are interreiated. He advised that the Pla.n'ning arid ZonIng " "C6ini11issicil) could m~ke twp separate motionsontheseitems. ... '.' '. , -- " -, - ,-, ;,-:.,,_>'.-" :,.:j,:~.",.._~.'-';":' '::::'.-,rl_':~'_:~"_<"<-,,'-'_""_, _'-' ,'_':-:: -,~>,;"~::_:,-",,,:,\-,-,",..,----.. _ ,,__..'-___":,..,-. ,-:_,,-:.:,'_ _'-<.'-:.:'....',!_..---~. ,,:':"";', ':Mr.;Hirizmanstated the GitY'of"Andoveris ',. proposil1gaCql11preher;,sive. PlanAili~~drilentand ....... ,'Rezoning fot 60acies6fproperty)6catect just north of the fox, Hqllows Sub'diyisi0l1"between ' . . ~ightil1g;ale Street '. and, Hanson.f3oulevard NW; al1d, is owned.PY,Grey OakS,..,Inc:.,.Hestate~ the. proposal.. before theCommissiol1is a Comprehetisive Plan ,Ainendnient fronfthe RM~ Residential .., Medium' Densitytand 1Jse Districttothe'RU, Residential:.UrbaI?- Single~FmnilyDistriCt, and. :: concurrently with this lsthe.. Rezbn~ngfrom' M-2,Resideniialrv1:ultipleDwellirig, to R-4,Singk Family Urban..., ,. . . . . . . . . . Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 25, 2000 Page 2 Mr. Hinzman stated the applicable ordinances that regulate the Comprehensive Plan Amendment are Minnesota State Statute, Chapter 473.858, which states that a Comprehensive Municipal Plan is in conflict wiili the Zoning Ordinance or any other official controls, those official controls must be changed to conform with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Hinzman stated the ordinances applicable to the Rezoning portion of this request are Ordinance 8, Section 5.02, which establishes the procedure for changing zoning district boundaries, and Section 5.03 B, which establishes criteria. He provided a brief outline of the criteria presented, which is applicable for both t11e Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Rezoning. Mr. Hinzman advised that the Comprehensive Plan is a long-range document, which contemplates future land use, and the zoning is the legal definition for land use on the property. Mr. Hinzman stated the adjacent land use to the north and west of the proposed site is a rural residential scenario, with tlle Wittington Ridge development to the west of Nightingale Street, and unplatted property to the north. The surrounding areas to the east and south are in the MUSA, and include the Fox Hollows Subdivision to the souili, and Cmnbridge Estates to the east, across Hanson Boulevard. Mr. Hinzman stated the Comprehensive Plan includes a number of items that relate to residential development, and specifies criteria for residential development in the future. He provided a summary of these criteria, which indicate that as residential development occurs. the City is concerned with the controlled extension of services, providing appropriate buffers for new residential development, and providing for adequate public facilities, i.e., schools, parks, and fire protection. Mr. Hinzman stated the criteria also identify the policies related to housing and residential land use, and indicates that the City should include a variety of housing types, including Multiple Family, and that platting and development of residential neighborhoods as units should be encouraged. He advised that there should also be a continuity of street patterns, protection against adverse environmental impacts, protection against encroachment and intrusion of incompatible land uses, and strong encouragement of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance. Mr. Hinzman stated this particular item has come before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council several times in the past. He advised that at the January 4, 2000 City Council meeting, the Council auiliorized staff to submit a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning for this area. He explained that this action was not brought forward by ilie developer, but rather, was initiated by the City. Mr. Hinzman stated the proposed change is more consistent with the surrounding land uses. He explained there is Single Fmnily development abutting the site to the south mld east. The existing Multiple Fmnily designation creates an abrupt change in density from adjacent rural properties which Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 25, 2000 Page 3 abut the property to the north and west, and urban expansion is not planned to the west of this property. Mr. Hinzman advised that tI1e December 4, 1999 GreyOaks submittal exceeds the 6 units per gross acre maximum density requirement of tl1e RM, Residential Medium Density District, with a proposed density of 8.6 units per acre. Mr. Hinzman noted this area is currently within the MUSA. He indicated that staff is cun-ently exmnining options for transferring the Multiple Fmnily designation to other properties in the City. He explained that Multiple Fmnily development will become additionally necessary in the future, and staff does not desire to see this type of development eliminated in the City as a whole. Staff is exmnining other areas in the City with the smne number of buildable acres, where the smne number of units could be transferred to, and would be bringing this forward in the near future as a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Mr. Hinzman outlined the Commission's options for action. He stated staff recommends approval of both the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Rezoning of the property. Commissioner Hedin inquired how this proposed Rezoning would affect the original Grey Oaks J Preliminary Plat approval. Mr. Hinzman explained that tl1e Council would have two items before them for consideration, a Preliminary Plat that has been conditionally approved, and the Rezoning of tl1e property and Comprehensive Plan Amendment. He stated that eventually, the City Council would have to determine which use and which type of development they See appropriate for this property. He advised that the Council would sort through this at their first meeting in March, which is the expiration date of the one-year sunset clause on the Preliminary Plat, and at that time, would either extend the time period for review, or accept the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Rezoning. Mr. Hinzman explained that at this point, tl1e Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to review the compatibility of the single-fmnily residential land use district for this area. He stated staff would bring the Commission's recommendation forward to the City Council, to assist them in making a decision on the future of this property. Commissioner Hedin inquired if ilie Rezoning would have a negative effect of the original Preliminary Plat. Mr. Hinzman stated the developer would not be able to proceed with the original plat if the Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment are approved, as the proposed density would exceed the requirements for the Single Fmnily Residential zone. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 25, 2000 Page 4 Motion by Daninger, seconded by Falk, to open the public hearings for Items 3 and 4, at 7:10 p.m. Motion carried on a 6-ayes, O-nays, I-absent vote. Joseph Finley, representative of Grey Oaks, Inc. stated ilie action that the Plarming and Zoning Commission is being asked to approve is very unorthodox. He advised that the Preliminary Plat was approved on March 2, 1999, and under State Law, the City is absolutely prohibited from rezoning or mnending tlle Comprehensive Plan or density controls for a one-year period from the date of a Preliminary Plat approval. He stated this action would appear to violate State Statute 462.358, which places a one-year moratorium on cities' ability to change a Comprehensive Plan or any official control after Preliminary Plat approval. Mr. Finley stated he believed tllis action was premature regardless of this statute, as that date, the developer had submitted a complete packet to the City for final plat approval. He explained that they were not required to submit until March 2, however, they had done so that date, because of the dependency of this action. Mr. Finley stated this plat was nothing like the December 6 submittal, which the developer has pulled off of the table, due to the negative public response it had engendered. He stated the final plat approval is simply the Prelin1inary Plat with very simple modifications, made only to meet the conditions placed upon it by the City Council. He advised tllat it is black-letter law in the State of / Minnesota, that when a Preliminary Plat has been approved, the developer is entitled to final plat approval if it is submitted within a one-year period, and meets the conditions that the Council has imposed. He stated for iliis reason alone, it was premature to act upon this matter at this time. Mr. Finley stated a third factor for consideration is that in reliance on that Preliminary Plat, Grey Oaks, Inc. has already spent over $600,000 creating that land, installing utilities, and excavating building basements. He stated these were dollars that could only be spent for the project that was approved in the original plan. He reiterated tllat it would be very unorthodox for the City to rezone the property during a one-year period in wruch they are prohibited from rezoning, when the developer has already spent $600,000 to satisfy the conditions it placed upon him in the Preliminary Plat. Mr. Finely stated there was likely a very good reason why this action was being considered, aliliough not entirely apparent to him. He stated that typically, when property is rezoned, especially property which affects only one owner, there is often a study done, because there is a presumption that the zoning which is in place is valid zoning. He stated that typically, when zoning is changed, a study is performed, and that change would be given the smne dignity as the original zoning in the City, when that zoning was enacted. Mr. Finley stated the materials he has seen provide no indication iliat any study has been done. He stated tllis is simply the rezoning of one person's property without studies, during a period in which / rezoning is prohibited, and after the developer has spent $600,000 on a Preliminary Plat, which Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 25, 2000 Page 5 would be rendered nugatory by this rezoning. He advised that for these reasons, the Planning and Zoning Commission should table this item, or set it over until a more appropriate time. Chair Squires requested clarification regarding the modifications made to the Preliminary Plat that were submitted that date. Mr. Finley explained that as this was not a hearing on the final plat, he had not come prepared to , inform the Commission regarding each modification, however, it is very similar to the original plat. He stated the location of one roadway has been slightly shifted, in response to the City's request for additional parking, more impervious surface, and less green space than the original plan provided. He explained that addressing this request involves ilie relocation of several roadways and structures, and as these are conditions imposed upon the developer by the City, they must be changed. Mr. Finley stated the current submittal bears no relation to the December 6 proposal that many people found to be unacceptable. He advised that the proposal is almost identical to the Preliminary Plat, wiili the exception of an additional townhouse in a comer of the site, which was added when something else was subtracted from another area of the site, during the relocation of a road. He reiterated that all of the changes were very minor, and to the untrained eye, the final plat would appear to be identical to the original plat. Mr. Finely explained iliat they had also submitted a packet containing all of the Association documents that date. Chair Squires stated his question in this regard was due to the suggestion that the Planning and Zoning Commission was prohibited from acting upon this matter at this time, because the developer had submitted that infornlation. Mr. Finley explained iliat Statute 462.358, Procedure for Plan Effectuation, Subdivision Regulation, Section 3C, Effective Subdivision Approval, indicates "For one year following preliminary approval, and for two years following final approval, unless the subdivider and the municipality agree otherwise, no mnendment to a Comprehensive Plan or official control shall apply to or .effect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout, or dedication or platting required or permitted by the approved application." He stated this is State Law, and is a safe harbor, to provide that the City can not pull the rug out from under a developer who has proceeded with a project based upon the Preliminary Plan approval. Mr. Finely stated iliis Statute goes on to indicate that later in that time period, any change must be considered very carefully, if an investment has occurred in reasonable reliance upon the approved application, and the subdivider will suffer substantial financial danlage as a consequence of a requirement to submit a new application. He explained that this provision is in the Statute because there is a long history of subdividers, who after having obtained approval, and spending much money attempting to comply with the City's conditions, are preempted very quickly after approval. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 25, 2000 Page 6 He stated he was not suggesting that the City was attempting to do this, however, he would suggest that what is being considered violates this Statute on all fours. Chair Squires inquired if this Statute also contemplates that the final plat approval submittal be consistent with what was approved at the Preliminary Plat stage. Mr. Finley stated this particular Statute does not, however, it does contemplate that final plat approval uses the Preliminary Plat as a base line, and addresses the concerns of the conditions placed by the Council and results in a plan which reflects this. He stated that this is what they have done, and they have prepared a very different final subn1ittal than that brought forward on December 6. He indicated iliat the Case Law is very clear, in that the subdivider is entitled to final plat approval if the conditions placed by the Council on the Preliminary Plat are satisfied. Chair Squires stated one of the requirements imposed by the City Council for the Prelin1inary Plat and Planned Unit Development approvals relates to the senior housing issue. He inquired if this issue is addressed in the final submittal. Mr. Finley stated they have addressed this to the extent they can legally do so. He explained that there is also Case Law, which states that if the conditions of subdivision approval are not legal, the subdivider can disregard the illegal condition. He indicated that in the Multiple Fmnily portion of this proposal, the developer has reserved the right to develop "over 55" housing, to the extent that it is rental, and not sold. He noted that the developer reserves this right, however, must comply with the Federal Fair Housing Act, as well as Minnesota State Law. He explained that to the extent that this is the requirement, it is included, and to the extent that the requirement is more than that, it is illegal, and also violates the anti-coercion laws of HUD and FHA, funds of which, the City is a reci pi ent. Commissioner Falk inquired if the developer has met the conditions set forth by the City Council. Mr. Finley stated there were two approvals, one for the Plarmed Unit Development, and one for the Subdivision: He noted iliere were approximately 22 to 23 conditions for approval in the Subdivision, and they believe they have satisfied all of these conditions. He explained that there were approximately 7 conditions set forth in the Plarmed Unit Development, and one of these was a vaguely worded condition regarding housing for the elderly. He stated they believe they have clearly satisfied all of the conditions, with ilie exception of that related to elderly housing, and have satisfied this condition, to the extent that law permits. Chair Squires inquired if, regardless of whether or not they believe that the law permits the City to impose a condition involving senior housing, this condition has not been met. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 25, 2000 Page 7 Mr. Finley stated they believe they have met this condition, however, it is very vaguely worded. He pointed out that the cun-ent consideration is not a hearing on the final plat, but rather upon the proposal to rezone the property. Chair Squires advised iliat he was aware of this, however, Mr. Finely was making the issue of the final plat gennane for the Commission's consideration. Mr. Finley stated they have submitted a [mal plat for review by the City. Mr. Hinzman indicated that staff has received the revised Preliminary Plat, however, he has not seen the covenant documents, and therefore, is uncertain whether or not they have been submitted at this time. He noted that the newly submitted Preliminary Plat closely resembles the original submittal. He stated ilie City Council has not had the opportunity to review the revised preliminary plat, and may not be aware that it has been submitted at this time. Mr. Hinzman advised that the current consideration is the Single Fmnily Residential District Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the property. He explained that when this matter goes before the City Council, in conjunction with the documentation submitted by ilie developer, the Council would render their decision. He stated however, at this time, the Planning and Zoning Commission is charged with providing a recommendation related to the Comprehensive Plan / Amendment and the Rezoning of this property, in order to assist tl1e Council in making a decision regarding the future of land in this area. Chair Squires stated he understood this, however, Mr. Finley has asserted that based upon the current submittal, and the approvals tllat have been given, there may be some question regarding whether it is even appropriate to consider a land use change. He explained that the Commission should consider this, and ultimately, the Council would consider this as well. Commissioner Apel pointed out that this decision was not within the purview of the Planning and Zoning Commission, but rather the City Council. Chair Squires stated this was correct, however, by holding the public hearing on this matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission was developing a record for review, as well. . . Commissioner Daninger inquired if Mr. Finley's suggestion tl1at a change could not be made within a year would also apply to a recommendation. Mr. Finley stated the Statute indicates a change could not be made. Commissioner Apel advised that the Planning and Zoning Commission's action on these items would not constitute a change. , Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 25, 2000 Page 8 Mr. Hinzman pointed out that the Preliminary Plat was conditionally approved, and it is uncertain if the one-year time period is applicable if the conditions of the Preliminary Plat have not been accepted by the Council, however, this would be an issue for the City Attorney to determine. Chair Squires stated the plan that was presented by the developer at the last meeting appeared to be completely inconsistent with the preliminary plan that was approved. He inquired why the developer had done this. Mr. Finley explained that after reviewing tlle conditions, Mr. Winshital had interpreted that the City desired someiliing slightly different than the preliminary plat, and therefore, proceeded wiili tlle preliminary plat as a base line, making only the minimum changes necessary to meet the conditions of approval imposed by the City. He stated he could not speak for Mr. Winshital, however, he believed he was doing something that the City would find acceptable. He pointed out that once he learned that ilie City was not pleased, he attempted to go back within the period of the Preliminary - Plat approval, and do only what the City approved. Chair Squires inquired if the number of proposed units had increased from 350 to 519. Mr. Finley stated this was immaterial as this plan was withdrawn~ Brian Cooth, 15667 Raven Street NW stated he was concerned with regard to the plan for the 500 plus units, which was withdrawn. He commented that this proposal does not fit in with the surrounding area. He inquired regarding the sudden change in the plans, and why such a thing was presented and then withdrawn. He remarked that it seemed a little bit shaky, at best, in terms of what they are attempting to do. Mr. Cooth stated iliere are many reasons people move to Andover, and this proposal is not one of them. He explained that he attempted to move into an area comprised of some acreage, and in his opinion, this proposal destroys the City. He stated he is completely opposed to the development proposal, and in favor of the rezoning, which is one of the smartest moves the City could make for this area, for several reasons. He pointed out iliat if there were no guarantee that this development would be senior housing, there would be a problem with regard to the schools, which could not handle the additional population it would draw. He explained that he worked with the schools, and they are already very full. He inquired where they would put all of the children who would come in, adding that if the development is not restricted to seniors, there will be children iliere. He noted that even if there were only one child per unit, this would result in an enormous mnount of attendance. He reiterated that he was in favor of rezoning the property. Kim Dickeson, 105629 Raven Street, stated she felt the rezoning was very important to the City of Andover at this time. She indicated she has attended the School Board meetings, where they are currently fighting to obtain a school to accommodate the children. She commented that the proposed development, if not restricted to seniors, would result in many problems. She noted many housing Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes-January 25,2000 Page 9 developments have been approved in tl1e City for construction within the next two years, and the schools are not able to accommodate all of these children. Ms. Dickeson stated the moved from Plymouth to the City of Andover, having researched where they would like to live for two years. She indicated her child was in Kindergarten when they moved into the area, and purchased acreage property from Mr. Winshital. She stated they were promised that they would be completely surrounded by similar properties, however, the area was rezoned, and they have been following this matter since they becmne aware of the rezoning. She stated she was aware that the developer may be able to proceed with the current proposal, however, it was time to consider the Comprehensive Plan, and what is really needed in the City of Andover. Ms. Dickeson stated all of tl1e property along Nightingale Street, to the west of the proposed development, is acreage, and these rental units would be adjacent to a school. She pointed out iliat there was no mass transit in Andover, and no Police Department, and the proposed density of this development would not be appropriate in this area. Ms. Dickeson stated the Metropolitan Council requires transition, however, there was no transition from the two-acre properties located directly across the street, to a Multiple Dwelling development. She requested this matter be considered very carefully, in terms of whether or not it fits into the area, , adding that she does not believe it does. / Mike Goetz, 15629 Osage Street stated he would like to reiterate Mr. Hinzman's comment regm.ding other properties in the City that could possibly be rezoned for this type of development. He stated that the R-4 zoning was more appropriate for this area, and would be advantageous to all of the surrounding neighbors, whereas the M-2 zoning would be more appropriate in other areas of the City, and would be advantageous to the City for many reasons, including transportation and safety. Bob Almeda, 15711 Nightingale Street stated ilie City approved 324 units on the original plan. He . indicated that with iliat plan, he would have 15 townhomes looking down on his property, however, tl1e developer is now proposing to increase this to 524 units, which would create one 3D-unit, and three 24- unit structures adjacent to, and looking down upon his property. He stated he found the original plan to be acceptable, however, he was opposed to the cun-ent proposal. . He indicated he was in favor of rezoning the property to Single Family Urban. Chair Squires advised that based upon Mr. Finley's statement, the developer has abandoned the proposal for 519-units. Tony Howard, 2119 156th A venue stated all of the residents in this area have been following iliis proposal for the past year and a half, and some have been fighting it every step of the way, as they are opposed to it, and it is not what the City needs. He stated this proposal provides no transition from the R-4 Zoning District. He advised that the M-2 zoning was originally supposed to be located Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes-January 25, 2000 Page 10 on the east side of Hanson Boulevard, however, it had been changed on the west side because it was to be senior housing, which is no longer in the equation. Mr. Howard stated the residents of iliis area were somewhat satisfied with the proposal for senior housing, however, iliis has changed. He inquired what other changes would occur after this, and how many more times would the residents have to come in and discuss this matter. He stated he would like to have the zoning changed back to R-4, and finalize the matter. He indicated that the developer should attempt to find some other location for tl1is proposal, where the transition makes sense. Mr. Finley explained that iliere was no Sketch Plan for 512 units, and if this was the basis for opposition, it is completely irrelevant, because what is being proposed is exactly what was approved. Mr. Finley stated he is a city planner, with a degree in planning as well as law. He indicated there is a very interesting transition in this area, and tremendous mnounts of open spaces, wetland preservation, and ponds. He explained that iliat. ilie reason for considering the Planned Unit Developments and increasing density is to preserve ilie mnenities that exist, and the Preliminary Plat indicates the preservation of a tremendous mnount of open space. He stated this proposal is acreage development, and the transition is apparent, upon exmnination of the plat. , , Mr. Finley stated iliat in his understanding, they have done everything possible; within the limits of the law, to restrict tl1is development to "over-55" housing. He advised iliat they will discuss this matter further with ilie City Attorney to determine what options are available in this regard. He stated the developer has not backed away from the senior housing proposal. He commented that he knew of no other development in the Twin Cities in which a restriction has been imposed by the city, in terms of the age of the residents. Mr. Finley explained that when senior housing development is contemplated, the developer builds a certain product that appeals to that segment of the market, and that is what is being proposed at this site, by and large. He stated this development would appeal to senior citizens, and could be marketed to these individuals, without a restriction from the City. He reiterated he knew of no other cities iliat impose these restrictions. Mr. Finley stated they were proposing to fit into the over-55 housing category, as defined by the Federal Fair Housing Act. He explained that this category limits their ability to place restrictions, and ilie developer could only require that one member of the household must be over 55 in 80 percent of the housing, and they could not restrict children. He stated the market would provide a large number of senior citizens for this type of development. He indicated that single family homes would certainly bring in more children than iliis proposal, and would create much more pressure on the schools than they would ever have with this development. He stated their proposal may not have Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 25, 2000 Pagel] a restriction in the legal sense, but through the marketing of the units, it was likely there would be fewer children than with single fmnily development. There was no other public input. Motion by Apel, seconded by Dalien, to close the public hearings on Items 3 and 4, at 7:42 p.m. Motion carried on a 6-ayes, O-nays, I-absent vote. Commissioner Daninger requested clarification regarding the City Council's process for determining tllis matter. Mr. Hinzman explained that if a recommendation was made at that time, the Council would have for consideration the Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the recommendation. of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the request from the developer with the new Preliminary Plat, and the new covenants iliat have been submitted. He stated the Council would then proceed to determine whether or not the covenant documents and the Preliminary Plat meet the requirements of the Planned Unit Development and the Preliminary Plat, and if that is the case, would accept those documents and approve them. He indicated that if the Council finds those items do not meet the requirements, they could proceed with the Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment, / assuming that these actions would not be in conflict with State Statutes. He advised that the City Attorney would review the Statutes to insure that the City is in compliance with them. Commissioner Daninger asked what would occur ifthe items were tabled at iliis time. Mr. Hinzman indicated if the matter is tabled, and no recommendation is provided prior to consideration of the Preliminary Plat, the Council could not accept those documents, or determine they do not meet the requirements, and thereby rule the matter null and void prior to the March 2 sunset date. He advised that it was the Council's direction to have the option of the single-fmnily scenario before them at the time the Preliminary Plat is considered, in the event that the developer does not meet ilie requirements of the Preliminary Plat. Commissioner Apel stated the Planning and Zoning Commission, as an advisory group, would be acting in the interest of the decision making function to forward the matter with a recommendation of some form, rather than tabling it. He stated he would at iliis time, argue for a recommendation of approval. Commissioner Falk inquired regarding the implications presented by the Statute cited by Mr. Finley. Commissioner Apel stated this was to be determined by the Attorneys. He pointed out that it would not take effect until March 3, and the Council appears to desire to have this matter in a position to allow them to make a decision. He stated the Council members are the elected officials. He advised iliat they are required to hold a public hearing to inform the public, and although he was not certain Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes -January 25, 2000 Page 12 he agreed or disagreed on any of these items, he would be willing to forward a recommendation to the Council, to assist them in the decision making process. Commissioner Hedin explained that the actions of the Planning and Zoning Commission would not have any effect upon the Preliminary Plat or the final approval, because the decision is within the purview of the Council. He noted that if the Commission were to recommend approval of the Rezoning and the Comprehensive Plml Amendment, it would be the responsibility of the Council and their attorneys to determine what legally could be done. Commissioner Daninger pointed out that the Commission could also recommend to deny these items, and the Council would still have the option to move forward with them. Commissioner Hedin stated this was correct, however, the Commission would not take any rights away from iliis project by recommending approval of the Rezoning, because the developer would still have their right to seek final plat approval Mr. Hinzman reiterated that ilie Commission's recommendation would be an advisory board decision and would not be a final decision that would invalidate any rights of the applicant. Commissioner Dalien added that this would simply keep all of the options open to the Council, and that is what the Plmming and Zoning Commission should be considering. He stated it was unfortunate that they were once again in iliis position, however, tl1is was not due to the Councilor the Commission, but railier an unfortunate set of circumstances created by the developer. He advised that it would be in the best interest of the City of Andover to keep this option alive, so that the City Council could proceed in this direction if necessary. He stated he would. be in favor in moving forward with a recommendation of approval. Chair Squires stated this was a fairly significant issue for many people, ilierefore, the Commission should exmnine it in further detail. He inquired if at the time of the initial application for the senior housing complex, there was a consensus between ilie developer and the City as to ilie n.ature of this Grey Oaks Development. He stated the minutes reflected that it would be a senior housing complex or community, and as tlle matter went through the process for approval of both ilie Preliminary Plat and the Planned Unit Development, this condition was imposed on both, memorializing that understanding. Chair Squires stated he did not recall that Mr. Winshital had ever objected to the agreement between the parties as to what this development would be. He inquired if there was anything in writing that indicated Mr. Winshital objected to this condition, or did not believe it was legal at that time. He noted Mr. Finley's statement that ilie developer may not have to comply with this condition in entirety, because of State Law, and while this may be the case, it was still a condition the City thought could be imposed, and to his recollection, the developer never objected to it. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 25, 2000 Page 13 j Mr. Hinzman advised that when the original land swap between Chesterton Commons and this development occurred, it was noted in the minutes that the developer would offer up ilie 60 acres north of Fox Hollows for a "senior development with many mnenities". He stated during that time, they have discussed the senior aspect of this proposal with the Council and the developer on many different occasions, and the developer's main concern has been how he can legally do this, and this has been reiterated this evening by Mr. Finley. He pointed out that he did not believe the developer has stated, at any time, that he does not wish to proceed wiili iliis project as a senior housing development, but rather that there has been discussion regarding the legalities, and what would be acceptable to the City Council. Chair Squires stated the rezoning of this property from Single Fmnily to Multiple Family was based upon a mutual understanding regarding the nature of the project. He explained iliat if this mutual understanding is unattainable, whether by the voluntary actions of the applicant in submitting an inconsistent plan, or by some operation of law, which makes what was envisioned no longer possible, it would be appropriate to revisit the rezoning, in iliat the reason for it no longer exists. He stated this is a factor that should be considered. Chair Squires pointed out that when this matter cmne forward, there were discussions regarding the fact that this Multiple Fmnily piece of property would be entirely sun-ounded by Single Fmnily / residential property, which is sometimes referred to as "spot-zoning." He explained that this area was rezoned to Medium Density, because of the possibility of life cycle housing, which ilie Metropolitan Council and other organizations encourage. He stated if there was no guarantee that the developer was going to build what was mutually agreed upon, it would be appropriate to go back and revisit the issue ofthis Medium Density piece, in the middle of the Single Fmnily. Comn1issioner Apel added that the fact that this situation exists, in itself, would appear to be a large enough issue to revisit the decision making, and attempt to reinstate the original zoning. Commissioner Hedin pointed out that if the final plan were approved as presented, this discussion would be moot, because the proposal would have been approved within the one-year period. He added that if it were not approved, the developer would have to submit another Preliminary Plat, and would commence another one-year sunset from the date of its approval. He advised iliat if approval is not granted until after March 2, the Commission's recommendation to approve the Rezoning to the R-4 designation would give the Council opportunity to do so at the March 3 City Council meeting. Chair Squires stated there appeared to be many issues with the Preliminary. Plat, which will have to be sorted out by the Council and the City Attorney in terms of whether or not the developer has an absolute right to have a Preliminary Plat. He stated there is an issue of inconsistency, in terms of the simple modifications to ilie Preliminary Plat that Mr. Finley has referenced, which might be interpreted otherwise. He advised that the Final Plat must be consistent with the Preliminary Plat. / He explained that if it is not, and the developer does not provide the covenants for senior housing that are consistent wiili what ilie City has requested, the Council would have to decide if the Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 25, 2000 Page 14 developer has complied witl1 that condition. He stated the decision would initially be made by the City Council regarding whether or not the developer has a right to Final Plat approval, and if it is concluded that they do not, the Council would have to consider whether or not it is appropriate to Rezone. Chair Squires stated there are standards for rezoning, which is a legislative act by the City, and there must be reasons and rationale for rezoning. He stated he agreed with Mr. Finley, in tl1at the City could not rezone property on a whim, however, he does not believe the City must have evidence of a comprehensive study in order to do so. Chair Squires stated the Commission was been involved in the initial decisions made on this proposal, and Commissioner Apel, who participated on the Comprehensive Plan Task Force, has much background on this issue. He stated the residents who live in the surrounding areas have also provided their input. He advised that they were all aware of the nature of the surrounding areas, therefore, there is suffiCient information before the Commission to determine whether or not the Rezoning would be appropriate, in the absence of ilie right of the developer to obtain tl1e Final Plat approval on this proposal. Commissioner Hedin stated the property was rezoned in order to allow for the Preliminary Plat, therefore, if the Preliminary Plat is not obtained approval, there is sufficient reason to divert back to the R-4 designation, to provide for buffering. He stated he would be in favor of recommending approval of the Rezoning, contingent upon the lack of final approval of the original Preliminary Plat, which is for the Council to determine. Mr. Hinzman advised that in the past, the City has entered into contractual rezonings, with certain conditions placed upon them. He stated generally, rezonings are either an up or down amendment of the ordinance. He explained that in the past they have added some conditions to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, when there was concern that the rezoning only proceed if the City Council were to deny the Preliminary Plat, and this might be an appropriate place to indicate this condition. Commissioner Apel stated he did not believe the Commission should be indicating conditions at this time, because the condition exists, with or without it being specified in the instrument, itself. He . stated it was obvious iliat if the City Council approves the Preliminary Plat as presented, the point is moot. Commissioner Daninger stated he agreed with iliis. He explained that the goal of a public hearing is to allow the public to speak, as well as to gailier information. He stated what they were attempting provide the Council with information to utilize during the decision making process, and much has come forward. He reiterated that the consideration currently before fue Commission was to recommend approval or denial of the Rezoning, and as they would all like to proceed with this matter, he would move to recommend approval. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE: January 25, 2000 ITEM NO. 3 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Public Hearing: Planning CPA 00-01 Land Use Change RM to RU John Hinzman NE Y4 of Section 22 City Planner City of Andover ReQuest The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to change the land use district designation from RM, Residential Medium Density to RU, Residential Urban Single Farnily. The proposed 60 acre site is owned by Grey Oaks, Inc. and is located in the NE Yt of Section 22, north of the FOX HOLLOW SUBDIVISION, between Nightingale Street and Hanson Blvd. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment is submitted in conjunction with a rezOlling to R-4, Single Family Urban. Applicable Ordinances Minnesota State Statute Chapter 473.858 states, "If the comprehensive municipal plan is in conflict with the zoning ordinance, ilie zoning ordinance shall be brought into conformance with ilie plan... after August I, 1995, a local governmental unit shall not adopt any fiscal device or official control which is in conflict with its comprehensive plan. " Land Use Plan and Zoning Map Often times, the land use plan and tlle zoning map are confused and thought to be the smne. The land use plan is general in nature and long range, the zoning map is short range mld precise. The land use plan sets the general guidelines for use by the Planning Commission and City Council in reviewing and evaluating development proposals. The zoning map is a tool to implement the land use plan. The land use map delineates the general land use areas by type, such as residential, industrial, and commercial. The zoning ordinance and accompanying map set forth and further refines permitted uses in each zone and establishes requirements for each use in specific zones. Comprehensive Plan Amendment 00-01 January 25, 2000 P & Z Report NE y. of Section 22, City of Andover Page 2 Adjacent Land Use Adjacent land use within 350' oftlle site includes the following: NOrtll . RR, Residential Rural; unplatted rural development East . Hanson Blvd - RU, Residential Urban Single Fmnily; CAMBRIDGE ESTATES South . RU, Residential Urban Single Fmnily - FOX HOLLOW West . RR, ResidentialRural- WITTINGTON RIDGE Comprehensive Plan The 1991 Comprehensive Plan identifies the following issues related to residential development: 1. The City is experiencing tremendous pressure for development of residential opportunities. Altllough the City desires to provide opportunities for a variety of housing types, it is concerned with maintaining high standards of quality and aesthetics. 2. As residential development occurs, the City is concerned with the controlled extension of municipal services to ensure cost efficiencies. 3. As residential development occurs, the City is concerned with providing / appropriate buffers between incompatible land uses. 4. As residential development occurs, the City is concerned with the provision of adequate public facilities including schools, police and fire protection, parks, connector streets, etc. 5. The City is concerned witll the maintenance and preservation of its agricultural lands. The Plan identifies the following policies related to housing and residential land use: . The City shall encourage a variety of housing types including multi-fmnily. . Planning and development of residential neighborhoods as units is encouraged: . Residential neighborhoods shall be developed to ensure the continuity of street patterns. . Residential neighborhoods shall be protected from adverse environmental impacts including noise, air and visual pollution. . Residential neighborhoods shall be protected from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible uses by buffering and adequate separation. . Planned unit development shall be allowed in order to: (1) preserve open space, (2) reduce unit land costs, (3) lessen the mnount of new dedicated streets (thereby reducing on-going repair and snow removal costs), (4) lower utility costs (through reduced footage and hence lower maintenance costs), and (5) reduce additional runoff resulting from development. Comprehensive Plan Amendment 00-01 January 25, 2000 P & Z Report NE Yo of Section 22, City of Andover Page 3 . Mid-density development shall be encouraged on a planned unit basis and shall specifically include provisions for traffic circulation that would mitigate adverse affects on existing single-fmnily residential neighborhoods. History . March 4, 1997 - Chesterton Partnership, tl1e owner of the proposed parcel suggests the City initiate a Comprehensive Plan amendment to exchange the RM, Residential Medium Density designation from Chesterton Commons to the subject parcel. Chesterton proposes to "construct senior citizen housing with many amenities." . April 1, 1997 - City Council approves an mnendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan from RR, Residential Rural to RM, Residential Medium Density. . March 2, 1999 - City Council approves the prelinlinary plat and planned unit development (PUD) for Grey Oaks a 352 unit senior housing community consisting of2 _ 65 unit apartment buildings, 6 - 30 unit apartments, 38 twin homes, 4 single family homes, and 4 acres of commercial development. Conditions were placed on both ilie PUD and plat to ensure development of a senior housing community. . December 14, 1999 - The developer submitted a revision to the prelin1inary plat of Grey Oaks totalling 516 units consisting of 18,24, and 30 unit buildings. Staff determined the proposal was not consistent with the conditionally approved plat and / should be considered as a new submittal via the sketch plan process. . January 4,2000 - The City Council discussed the December 14th submittal of Grey Oaks. The Council authorized staff to initiate a comprehensive plan amendment from RM, Residential Medium Density to RU, Residential Urban Single Fmnily. . January 11,2000 - The developer of Grey Oaks petitioned the Planning and Zoning Commission to withdraw the scheduled presentation and sketch plan discussion related to Grey Oaks. General Review . The proposed change is more consistent with sun-ounding land uses. Single-family urban development abuts the property to tl1e east and south. The existing multiple family designation creates an abrupt change in density from adjacent rural properties to tl1e north and west, where urban expansion is not planned. . The December 14th Grey Oaks submittal exceeds the 6 units per gross acre maximum density requirement oftl1e RM, Residential Medium Density district. (8.6 units per acre proposed). . The area is currently within the Metropolitan Urban Sewer Area (MUSA). . Staff is exmnining options for transferring tl1e RM, Residential Mediunl density designation to oilier properties. A formal comprehensive plml amendment request is Comprehensive Plan Amendment 00-01 January 25, 2000 P & Z Report NE y. of Section 22, City of Andover Page 4 tentatively scheduled for the February 8, 2000 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Commission Options The Plamling and Zoning Commission has the following options: 1. Recommend approval of the proposed land use change. 2. Recommend denial of tlle proposed land use change, citing those reasons for doing so. 3. Table the item pending additional information from staff or the applicant. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the comprehensive plan mnendment, subject to the approval by Metropolitan Council. Attachments . Resolution for Approval . Site Location Map . Application . Notice of Public Hearing CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTYOFANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -00 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM RM, RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY TO RU, RESIDENTIAL URBAN SINGLE F AMIL Y ON 60 ACRES LOCATED IN THE NE '14 OF SECTION 22 OWNED BY GREY OAKS, INC. (PIN 22-32-24-11-0002) WHEREAS, The City of Andover has petitioned to change the land use district designation from RM, Residential Medium Density to RU, Residential Urban Single Fmnily on approximately 60 acres owned by Grey Oaks, Inc., legally described as follows: The most northerly 60.00 acres of the Northeast Quarter of Section 22, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, and general welfare of the City of Andover; I WHEREAS, tl1e Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the amendment as requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that tl1e City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Comn1ission and approves said amendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan with the following condition: 1. Approval by Metropolitan Council. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 15th day of February 2000. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria V olk, City Clerk CPA 00-01 @ City of Change Land Use District from RM to RU Andover City of Andover = ~ ~ ~ : ~ ,~rr ~.' I - ~~".. 1594' ; 1'l ~ ~ 2054 <( . t;; 1,567 ~ ~ 9g . << ... N .... 2078 CJ 15914 Z 15911 Q~ ~I ~Jl - : -N t'I ~ Z > -'.. 9TH AVE - ~ ~ . I CD 1- .. !, 'I!': =1 - 15875 Z ~ 1i;l1~ .... i ~ , i ; tn~ ~ >-~t1 @-~---w~ ~ Z '~O ~ TH ~"u, / c:( 158 \! i ~ !I t 0 -===-.=:.m. 2023 15805 :z: 1452 168 ~ \: - .........v- 1Sl12i 2043 1580 158 T'582Z- ..:.::::. 15 VE 151ft 16111~) ~ ~ 1869 Hil'1IIl151 ~ 2148 20Ul 201S 151 1m 15798 ,-- 157 16789 ~ 15785 1781 I 1573 1_ I-----:::::'p-'-........~ 2057 ." ~ 1-/ -......:- ~ "7TH'" r \ ~..~ ~ ~ 21" 2124 2080 T F ~~_ ~3i 15711 .... tr; ?' .~ ",,"'.10' .....'...... ..... ". .,.. ...... . ,'V 'I" ! 16660 1, 51". ........>, ...i:'s/ii,')..... ............"...i<, '" ;,.... ~I} '. ... ~_l\...,...r- . ..s. . ";:",Lill-"'~" Xl ., 2'" ~;r ,..is, Change from RM. Residential Medium Density,' _ ~ ~ ~.] ~ ~ '5620 ~ ....... .... to \<.i' -< "'7'6632 !il ~ :' . 1~' m o I- ...... RU Residential Urban Single Family ~ --'-' I,,,g!~n ~ - / A ~ I - ',"t: ':\_ ..J --.. ..:.....J, 15 ~!! 15844 wi;..... 'c. CD ".. ~~ ~"" I'!~ _ 21" ,,,. ..;!' 1<") ,\. z - ~ ,,~ . !i \ '" 1-:' >" -""..::',:-.:,-:"'--;":''"''< 0 ~ ~ ~ ., '::::-. .......... 146 ~., 1559 ~ Zl......................'\..,.......; ,.........;.,.'.;. ,".,..rn ~ ~ ~-~~-;W~;!\ /J!t11t ~ . d, I . 01, I I - Z 15SO ~-..::.; ~ - - ~. .m. - -l J-=- ~ 155 S2 ,~94.~\~~~~~~:i!~i9;~;I~I$~1~15 16871665, ~~ ~ ~~~ 5542 15m~t;~:; Z 1957 ........................................................Y 155THLN 1:2 7~.:' 53",",:::::-_166580'=-'- 1641 ..... III ,;<;:,z}:/ 49 - I.u 1~ - 0:: ~ K ~;~ ~~ . "" ~ ~.'" .=~y.:9: 15486 ::::...... ~I L.!..J 13 '" ~'5S2' 1&51 "'- 15450 - C>.....~ r- ,u 0 N ., 1Ii6" .... I:: V',;( - !-'!Z!. 10m - .~ ~ ~2 . on" . ~ n~,. ,( ~ 1601'i1 545 ~ 7: ., ., (') .... . ~ 15.461 tSU~ ~ .7~ 0 i~' ~ ~\~ v.;;: ~/ tyn.l~ 1126:;1 ~ 150Ue m ~~ "," 5 --t~ ~x G iI ~ l ,,,<;:( = .~" ,S4C<) '" ~ !l ~'\"X ~ 2'20 2000 ~ ,j ~I ~0 '\ ; ~M ~ ''''0 ~ifro" _~~ R ~1 - ::.:":'il';:, !~ .~".~, - ~! !l- ~ ;':I~~h~;r> , -_ $ ~ ~;;; 9TT 16418 ~ ..... ~ 1493 ,.eo~: ;;s) ,--,. . F I ~~;:o -' ,\.... lSJl1I ,nr3 \5360 t!i3e5 t') 154THAVE 14) '\ f;;- 1675 0",,= == ~/"'''l .,RG 14 - ~ 16).19 ______ r.?~;:!!!;t ~ 1468 141 $I - ~. 'I~,w.~. 0- 16318 ., is ~ ~ ~ ~ _...... ~l 425 _ :: 2159 ~.... ~ ~~ ~ 15:m! ~!::.\ ... ""'b' '," " d ~- ~,g, I, ", ~.~.."'.:'...'t'''. ...~.....~.'.....~~...'..-........<</.. .;- 'Y'.::!.t;'i;";'T; '" ...........",:. , .~. 1i"..... \,;;; i)/i; \. ................ ..... . ''''.. .,. .~' ..,,'. ..., i~C;' J;i<,!~.ii' . "";'. ".'.':;;;" .... . ..... '. .. ~:fuIii1f,,,,'. '\~'.. ,,!r~. ,.., '!. Y Y,i" .. .. . .," 'i!':WV /, .., / \2"::;' ,,,', " us .'. .. .,~ ..:;. Y,..>tiP .c.,.;;. ~", ~ Rural Residential N Residential Urban Single Family ~ Sources: LEG END... Residential Medium Density . ~ if ~ i(,'l A Andover Engineering N Subject Property Residential Multiple Resldentiai p jL ~ ~ Andover GIS N Street Center Lines ~ Comm~rcial l~, I.:J-- Anoka County GIS , 0 350' Mailing Boundary tffi ~~~I~~nal I Site Location ~.~ cr P- ..."" . ~ DOpenSpace. .' .' . 'l<..l 1 inch = 990 feet RF-Ul,883 =~;~~~I~:::ures d__ .~,-, ~~ ~ M D te' January 12 2000 D RIght-of-Way ~ ap a . , I . .. . . '., '.'. . . . . CITY of ANDOVER. .: . . '. ".1685 CROSS1PWN.BOULEVARCl N.,!,. ..ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304.. (912)755-5100 . -'. '. .. "';. . ,: :'. .' . .' . . '.. "~' ... '.... .' ~/ . .:">~" ..~. ..,.:-.:,. .: .' .' 'i. .:;:.;:~j:>?~'>:. ;.....'::/ ;.::-L::.:. ;.::'>'~;::/:..:" . ~"...,:." .._ .'. ,;.. .:.' .. , REZONING REQUEST..FORM.i.':'+':l?;',!'.f.i':''':'t.,~,,!.\I.'';~':J:-.j,:;'':':'::":.:~,:",~~,.,.,, ,;;~:.:~. :~i .', .:'. :~'::":,:.,:' ~..:.. ~:: <:~',: '~;.;<. ~ ~ . .:'" .:~,~~;:'.i: ~,::~ ::.'.;~'::;~~~YJ~::i~:);'::~~~\f&i:/f~~:':~~~'~:';~~~";~~;~'.i}~\:~~~:;~i~:~~;;::t:..:;::~~~d~~li~~~~~ ~~~;'~" :' <. ....:,." .:."",' .... . '," .' . . 1.\" ", ..;;:: ..;: ..:. i . ... ".:.~~.:;~~ :(':'~{~'~""c '"J~'''';<-\'~''''':''''' ,~:........~.,;.,~,:.~",.':x.>."-t.r;.,,,...,., .,r' .'<.:~-''''a'.r;:. ':,~. '.' ..... . ;...'.... '. .....,.: -; . '..'.' "::'. 'i13EJ; .'-'\o"o+':' . e?!/....'.t ':2""" ;~-'Q'" .~' ~.";tr.'..t'f'.~" ,:I~"~.':;,"":;'... . ,... . P rty Addr' . '. ....' .., . .' .' . J '." ..' .... . " .. .' . rope ess .. '. .... ',' .'. .... '.' . " ..." . ....".<........ ...... ..... .. :'.". ..':. ..... '.:. ...,........ .:. '~:..'~::;. ::.::. .:'.' \::.:'. ....> )i':l.::::,:':;)::::::':." ,:.:;,~(.~;:\':'::. :(.::;;S~i:!.;::~~:<':,.:~:~::~~:::.:'~~~:;~f;':;::.:~~.'~:~H~i <. .' ,. ." Legal Descnption of Property:;(F1H In whichevel'..ls.approprtcjte): :-::<. "~'::':::~'.,:;i':.'.'::<;>:.~'~'='::::' ::~:':'~.i"."". /'.' ",'.':] , . ...... ',. Lot...... ~'.'. ~ ....... .' ~ ." ~o; , '. .... .., .... ... '.'~.'".Adf?!~:.:~.,:.';.. :.,.~,'5.~,'..~..'....'."..0.E',....,1;, '." 'PIN..d~ 5~ ~6[ .tl oroJ.,., "'<"<... .', ;.... .....,.. ..... ..' .".'.... ..,'. . .., ..'.'... " ',,,",, j',' (If mr ",d,~~~;.""'h ,~'7fr!;;;' l',,,at~~~ptiq.t,iJ~;7 ;,;:C: .,?!',,,;:\;:. '?tt Is the property Abstract or :rorrens: (To verify cali the Anoka c;ounty Office at . .... ~. . (612) 323-5400 with tl1e property PIN number)" .. .. . Abstract )( Torrens Reason for Request feZCIne Land kC1J1., i1.,...;;) / Mu/ft'O!p.Owel)/17g /0 ((-L{ I .S/fJ9{e Family (;(/10011 perC:I~Y ('Dl~/lr:,rl r!/fPr:{/02/)- . Cun-ent Zoning )1<:2 Requested Zoning P-Lf , Land Use District Currell? !2 /Vi I p((}/1J.'>ed RUt , " . .. Nmne of Applicant ell fy d f Afld.ouer Address 16'66 crosstown B/i.d ;1Jtv A-nd{J/Je/{ ;t(A/ f.;);~O!( Horn, Phon~55~BUtJ:.':' - Fax - ~(<, 2()OO Sign'''''' ,~ 'J . ~ D'" PIN 153224440001.0 PIN 153224430004.0 PIN 233224220052.0 APEL MAYNARD D & ELEANOR M PUTNAM JERRY & GLORIA CAMBRIDGE CAPITAL INC OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 941 HILLWIND DRNE #301 17". '57THLN 1869 157TH LN FRIDLEY, MN 55432 1 " NER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 j PIN 153224340006.0 PIN 153224430003.0 PIN 223224240011.0 MURPHY CRAIG E & BRENDA L CARDINALLA~NCEJ&JG OLSON ESTHER W 1965 107TH LN NW OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT COON RAPIDS, MN 55433 15785 NIGHTINGALE ST 15450 NIGHTINGALE ST ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 153224340008.0 PIN 223224210006.0 PIN 223224210004.0 MITCHELL RUSSELL &. PAMELA GOETZ MICHAEL J & KIM M SATHER GARY M & JOAN E OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 2032 157TH LN 15629 OSAGE ST 15532 NIGHTINGALE ST ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 153224430008.0 PIN 223224210007.0 PIN 223224110002.0 BLOOMSTROM SHELLEY JEAN MEAGHER ERIN J & DELANA S CHES1ERTON PARTNERSHIP OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 3640 152ND LN 15711 NIGHTINGALE ST 15651 OSAGE ST ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 SCOTT OLMSTEAD HOMES GOR-EM, LLC STEVE KELLEY 10734 HANSON BLVD NW REMAX COON RAPIDS, MN 55433 10732 HANSON BLVD NW 3351 ROUND LAKE BLVD COON RAPIDS, MN 55433 ANOKA, MN 55303 j RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 15486 MARTIN STNW 15496 MARTIN STNW 1957 155TH AVE ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 RESIDENT JERRY SAARENPAA 15476 EAGLE STNW 40826 COUNTY RD 311 ANDOVER, MN 55304 DEER RIVER, MN 56636 CITY OF ANDOVER j REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION DATE: May 2, 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Planning ITEM NO. Rezoning John Hinzman M-2 to R-4 City Planner NE '14 of Section 22 t4. City of Andover Request The City Council is requested to approve an mnendment to Ordinance 8, Section 6.03 to rezone land from M-2, Multiple Dwelling to R-4, Single Family Urban. The proposed site is approximately 60 acres and is located in the NE '14 of Section 22, north of ilie FOX HOLLOW SUBDIVISION, between Nightingale Street and Hanson Blvd. / The rezoning is submitted in conjunction with a comprehensive plan amendment to RU, Residential Urban Single Fmnily. Background . January 25, 2000 - The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 (1 absent) to recommend approval of the change. The Commission discussed ilie Grey Oaks project and recommended approval of the change to allow the City Council the opportunity to change the land use if the plat conditions were not met. . February 1,2000 - The City Council granted a 60-day extension (April 30th expiration) to the Prelin1inary Plat of Grey Oaks. . February 15, 2000 - The City Council tabled the item to the last meeting in April, upon approval of the Grey Oaks Preliminary Plat extension. . April 18, 2000 - During Mayor\Council input, the City Council requested the item be placed on the May 2, 2000 meeting if the Preliminary Plat for Grey Oaks expires. Page Two Rezoning NE \4 Section 22 May 2, 2000 . Additional background information on Grey Oaks is included in the January 25, 2000 Planning and Zoning Staff Report. Metropolitan Council Review Metropolitan Council has indicated that any mnendment to Comprehensive Plan cannot negatively affect the housing and density goals recently adopted by the City Council. If the multiple fmnily designation is removed from the subject property, additional property may need to be designated multiple fmnily development in order to gain Met Council approval. Attachments . Ordinance Amendment . Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report ~ January 25, 2000 / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO.8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 6.03, ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: Ordinance 8, Section 6.03, The Zoning District Map of the City of Andover is hereby amended as follows (PIN 22-32-24-11-0002): 1) Rezone from M-2, Multiple Dwelling to R-4, Single Fmnily Urban on approximately 60 acres legally described as follows: The most northerly 60.00 acres of the Northeast Quarter of Section 22, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. NOTE: All other sections ofthe Zoning Ordinance Shall remain as written and adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover. Adopted by ilie City Council of the City of Andover on this 2nd day of May 2000. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: I.E. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria V olk, City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE: February 25,2000 ITEM NO. 4 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Public Hearing: Rezoning Planning REZ 00-01, M-2 to R-4 NE Y. of Section 22 City of Andover John Hinzman City Planner Request The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the request of the City of Andover to rezone land from M-2, Multiple Dwelling to R-4, Single Family Urban. The proposed site is approximately 60 acres and is located in the NE Y. of Section 22, north of the FOX HOLLOW SUBDIVISION, between Nightingale Street and Hanson Blvd. I The Comprehensive Plan Amendment is submitted in conjunction with a comprehensive plan mnendment to RU, Residential Urban Single Family. Applicable Ordinances Ordinance 8, Section 5.02, establishes the procedure for changing zoning district boundaries (rezoning). Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(B) establishes the criteria for granting a special use permit. These same criteria have been utilized by the City in considering rezoning applications in the past. The criteria include the following: Effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the occupants of sun-oUllding lmld. Effect on existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land. Effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area. Effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. / Rezoning 00-01 January 25, 2000 P & Z Report NE y. of Section 22, City of Andover Page 2 Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 establishes the minimum length, width and size for property they are as follows: R-4, Single Family Urban: . Lot Width at Front Setback - 80 feet Lot Depth - 130 feet Minimum District Area - 11,400 s.f. Adjacent Land Use Adjacent land use within 350' of the site includes the following: North · R-l, Single Family Rural; unplatted rural development East · Hanson Blvd - R-4, Single Family Urban; CAMBRIDGE ESTATES South · R-4, Single Family Urban - FOX HOLLOW West · R-l, Single Family Rural- WlTTINGTON RIDGE History · March 4, 1997 - Chesterton Partnership, the owner of the proposed parcel suggests the City initiate a Comprehensive Plan mnendment to exchange the RM, Residential Medium Density designation from Chesterton Commons to the subject parcel. Chesterton proposes to "construct senior citizen housing with many amenities." · December 2, 1997 - City Council approves the rezoning from R-l, Single Fmnily Rural to M-2, Multiple Dwelling. · March 2, 1999 - City Council approves the preliminary plat and plmmed unit development (PUD) for Grey Oaks a 352 unit senior housing community consisting of2 - 65 unit apartment buildings, 6 - 30 unit apartments, 38 twin homes, 4 single fmnily homes, and 4 acres of commercial development. Conditions were placed on both the PUD and plat to ensure development of a senior housing community. · December 14, 1999 - The developer submitted a revision to he preliminary plat of Grey Oaks totaling 516 units consisting of 18,24, and 30 unit buildings. Staff determined the proposal was not consistent with the conditionally approved plat and should be considered as a new submittal via the sketch plan process. · January 4, 2000 ~ The City Council discussed tI1e December 14th submittal of Grey Oaks. The Council authorized staff to initiate a comprehensive plan amendment from RM, Residential Medium Density to RU, Residential Urban Single Family. / Rezoning 00-01 January 25. 2000 P & Z Report NE y. of Section 22, City of Andover Page 3 · January 11, 2000 - The developer of Grey Oaks petitioned the Planning and Zoning Commission to withdraw the scheduled presentation and sketch plan discussion related to Grey Oaks. General Review · The proposed change is more consistent with sun-ounding land uses. Single-family urban development abuts the property to the east and south. The existing multiple fmnily designation creates an abrupt change in density from adjacent rural properties to the north and west, where urban expansion is not planned. · Approximately 90-100 single-family homes could be developed on the site. · The area is currently within the Metropolitan Urban Sewer Area (MUSA). · Staff is examining options for transferring the M-2, Multiple Dwelling density designation to other properties. A formal comprehensive plan mnendment request is tentatively scheduled for the February 8, 2000 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Commission Options The Planning and Zoning Commission has the following options: 1. Recommend approval of the proposed rezoning. 2. Recommend denial of the proposed rezoning, citing those reasons for doing I so. 3. Table tlle item pending additional information from staff or the applicant. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the rezoning. Attachments · Ordinance Amendment . Location Map . Application · Notice of Public Hearing CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO.8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 6.03, ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: Ordinance 8, Section 6.03, The Zoning District Map of the City of Andover is hereby amended as follows (PIN 22-32-24-11-0002): 1) Rezone from M-2, Multiple Dwelling to R-4, Single Fanlily Urban on approximately 60 acres legally described as follows: The most northerly 60.00 acres of the Northeast Quarter of Section 22, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. NOTE: All oilier sections of the Zoning Ordinance Shall remain as written and adopted by ilie City Council of the City of Andover. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on tllis 15th day of February 2000. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: lE. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria V olk, City Clerk REZ 00-01 @ City of Rezone from M-2 to R-4 , Andover City of Andover L- I t li'~U:: :,:\"<<:1":',: - / / I L- ~ "."'Ci'K,"i;\'i"J / / I ~ t,y.' ">-'~0" I 'i':,~ I': I"',) ~ 12 !'Cii:>', u 15'" "\.',{:.' -' 19" I-I.g '<1'\ V"" <{ ~ 0115" ~l~ g ~ ~ I ',I,tl'O\,~I~I~;'A<i'~ Cl 15814 ~ 15.11 > "'"""WiF . i,V hh"".t'.., c' ~ '59" I ~ ~ =~~Jt.rjj=r~1 ~ a. fi!"~ m....~.. .". ,~, 8J.' "'.'.' '~. Jlrt~.,.,.,.. ~I ~~if~~~-:~~~~)~~" -~~..~~~!~~4f~~~i <{ ~~\mf~iHk1l..' :,~, "~l~~ 2043 2023 ,58OS :z: r!~1l~~.,'~'h;:' ,'~;,~I~;~~; ~Ii 1 'VE 11~"'""1'it.~'"'' '''~,~~ - \ '14' 2039 2019 ,,,. Il.~;_;~~ L 15785 1781 L;h-""""",IJi",,,!:aMI,l' r,tlill ~j-"",,~ 2OS~ r 1S7THU< 1~1'1.,~~!t~l~,~1' 21'4 ~J:1.. -",._::;:".", ~_Tl-!.l:l,-...-:cr.~."l.". +_ __.!f;;:7,;QO . _ . .' " ,C"!-,_ C~-I'.".'~.."J:c'-':0+ "-i:;;H~. ~~ .' ", Fi:!11:b ~~ " 2146 20'. ~ it!;r', """"!llitfr"i"'r~"i'P.1"""bt,.,,,[~~"1 1671' _ ftl '.~II;<<~{'J~t; ,', "::~!'tttlf ~ '~" lm1!+iEt'llitt~_"m-'"~.JlliiliI' '''''I''' ifOBl."ojj;' . :ti~:l;~: , ._ i:t:~~+!:p:~~-;'::-r~!':jpJft::..'t4 :t!plf"l .~,11!;! :<D'/F ~1'li~ 15660 1 S1 :1...:01.1..'",'. '..'.~..'.. _.'.'~."', ".Z. ;'il..."".,...,..O? .~t...~.'.-. ,..tt~.:~l.].;;.'.-" ?ifu.. ..r.:ttl:t.H;l.'.I.....~." '..'.. ....... '.'~. '. '.1'..'.." ~1fj ~iW'1.t~~:!~~BJ~~~~:~Lt~~J~~~gj;~~~~c.": ~,i:~ ,~u - " ~[,r <> . Rezone from M-2, Multiple Dwelling' i!t lli~_.l_~~t,; :'t. 'S62. \ 21" ~ " ." ,to . ~ t.~1f1~f~,,~ifI~.:~~!i.r,.~~t'~1~1l.~~.~t1.1~.dl./ ~ / H R-4, Single Family Urban -' ~..'"..;.1."".'..'i1*.. ~.II;.'. ,.!'2.;g.11 J..G!!..r(.".~..~ ."...'...."".,'."S..-.,~!ll. F.,.~.;l.l. ~.~1lll.".i\tt."'...t.w..Ii..;fjj..,b.~.I.t.~~. 'Il',. . . U)~ ~ . 'lii:J;! :.:z,!il!.W~j;-jllil ~.~:~ ~ "49~" ~I ;1< ., ' ,., "'. g _..'.!.. .'.!ii..~.~i,;If:<g'.j.::::!.'~':..;~.'tii~::.,.,.iW.l."...t.*. !'1'P~.~..,a.'ll,~.}'." ~ z, ~. . "'. ~ ..~ '~.. ~ - v. -" . B.,::1li~;z= "h;!t~l~"_..Jr.~~r.dl.}w,::"t:l. ./-':"_-'-1.+!-r~:;'~t~~~ i=L._"""'" .. "" -""\"'- .-:= _.... .. - z ~~~ :;,~pJ+..g11j t"'.,!i!I.l'~..i!tJ'.~.::dr.,,,,,,,,~~.'":+8}~'I~~ :J: h ~ ~ ~ . . " "< '687 '~S <{ ;,i-.'" ',~~.<""L.~',.'. ~~~il""'j1f...,<j<j "" o a-~m~~1;!~~:: ~ -" - - - 1B:z: ~.t'..l!'~i':lt'.C_",.."~jg-.C'..'."."''''~~.'.'.~'.'...''W'.'.'i'@'! 155\. Z 19571945..- g ..- ..- ..- ~ ~ ..- ~ ~17; . 155TH~ . 1641 ~~~t:~:~. ,_r':_<~,~i:;~t ~:" ~tt~lHI1it;~~~ '" :::;o-y ~ / ~77B I ~I ~I IT ~I ~I ~I !I,~ r;",,~!~~:.'~L.",'~.'-'~'<.".".."'._.'.W;."'..~~I~_..'..''.~1.1.1'.."'~."'.. " ;: K~~~ ':ii;'"r.-!~ '~~;~' :~,.~,~g:rf'<.~;,~~1jl :.:!: ~ 115488 ~ I ;: \ ~l ~ -; - ~ll.~~i~"r:L~ -- ~J~~ '~'~~"1' a~1t.i~' ~-~c - i"t.~\,~,::!;'-'I<;', :!! I !..so I '''70 ~ -1- -;;;;; ~ '01Jlii~j.i!qif~<)SZ~1l1' ',9~ '!$l';"';L'-""I1i-[.." '{ dl~ 15<lSI !~;--:;'"l "-"-l-" ~ I ,"-- :j _ '. '.j ~ I" ~'H~~~ ""I~ ~ . :;- . , v ~ 1&461 ='suo ~ If]W&- ili:t, c:f,l) ~ " '", _,-d-J~ ~ 1'.1' ~ 1925 15-l26 ~ 15400 "~. Ui+l":;- - .. --1 o.t:w.;; '[~. t'~, , l~"~'fl:j~f I-~J '1 ;. . ~~ ~ . =- ,~" ~j5'it~&~ =. ".-' '9 0 "', 09 , 'ie"":I;';'~' "W'" ..- 1Ii (ll a . 1S608 - , 1,~~tt1\t J 1 _ I=! " b:~~, i ~.;VO 2120 2060 ~ ~ ~ = ~ Ai'"tIiJ!!i1tm'" '!i!I[!,,,;'f~itffil';r'ef;~fui5j~ ~ 1&426 ~~ 15~ I~ti~i,~ij~eli~~ 3 :jl;~~~"~ -~ (N, j~W~ ~ * ,~. ~~~ -"'" I I 1}@If~~,\~'jh fS4MAVEiC-~1]jfifu~~P""~'~ ,,~ l ,\I - '"" 'Dn,~. ~ ~.'_O'~'"~~"'.j''''''~''''_'''''"','i1' ,.:Y,\ 1975 -- 1 r, _',c, i ~'or>;,;, ;l~ is' l'.,,;;l'liji;!-.l:'Ii, _;1 . :r.; ,-lr ~:Jt~d.;:r.-:r":: ~ ~L"l+1~j;!.- -1!li~ -;t'" ~.. ..~ .... ~. '1ilh","l, i1l~~" ~. -., ";-"'~--ie'\lir'" , . -c~,' 15'" · . · ='"" ""lmtllii' -cl _~,,", ~'". ~n,;', ., . ,_ :!: lIi '+llill-i-! I.......' 'tn~t5n:!+! l!ltl~ qjlF~~! -, ," "::-:t!1 2159 !!.... a ~~ ~ ~"d1:1.ilij-tlrf _:_ "-"Pi ~~.... j:j~)-j1~: - . ~~!:I ~Lwr41:1~_,_- "~... 1~ "jl II-~; -111:l_~ ", f- = :C1ltlf;]'I~IT~~jl:jJj~I~1 ~j ~~1lt_'~ ~ / I ~. B R-1 - Single Family-Rural J.f Lr- N R-1A-ManufacturedHouslng ~ -.i~=~ J ""' 4 A Sources: . . LEG END. R-2~SingIeFamny~Estate ~ :;:OI:Jq 1 Andover Englneenng o R-3 - Single Family.Suburban Andover GIS N Subject Property ITI8J R-4 - Single Family-~rban . 1 ~ Anoka County GIS N street Center lines [2J M-1 ~ Multiple Dwell~ng low Density ;<; ~ ~ M-2 - Multiple Dwellmg It: ' . ~_ ~. / 0 ' .. DLB.LlmttedBusine.. S't L catl'on. " "1l ~ ,dJ: 350 Mailing Bounda,,! EJ NB. Neighborhood Busine.. I ,.e a. rF"""'"' \.j.1? .A' . 1 inch _ 990 [oe' RF -1111,883 ~.'''.. SC_Shop!,ngCeoter, ~ ~~N ."",'.G8_Gener.lIBuSi""" ,\ MDt'J ary 122000 :.,,;,;,~: I ~ Industrial ap a e. ann , GR - General Recreation CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 0(612) 755.-5100 . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REQUESTFORM'~:, ,//'-:':,': .... :.;.. ',......' p<ope~.A~:~ ~~..,.;;i;f~":;g:.16.+~~:~~~>>tll~f.f~;B-:'.~%Z~. . .. . : " . ' . '" -. .\ '. ,.,' .'~, . '. ..,:.- - . Legal Description of Property: (Fill i.ri whichever is' appropriate)". '...''''.. ". . ," Lot . Block .,...Addition.... .......;.:.... ":. .' . . . . PIN: :;;t~--Sd...:;)N-:tr:..OOOj,: . . . ..,\ ':" " .',;. :::'<:>' ':':'.:'.. . ... . . . . . . . ,.~ -. (' (Ifmetesandbciunds,attac!ttheconiplet~!ega~descripiion). '.... ..-;: ',' . ,'. .' , ., .... Is the property Abstractor Torrens: (To verify thiscaIl the Anoka County Office at .. (612) 323-5400 with the property PIN number) Abstract X Torrens Reason for Request ChQ/'9p Compltd1ef}.')/1fl- P{Or7 Lal'd U5e () ,:sl-dcf +tOM eSt'OZI1l-lQ( e.5/delll,Q ().f60f/ S/t'{jfe.FaIV1/(Y Pel' elf." CO(.A(lC,I (:1{fedron. I I ! Current Land Use District R M Current Zoning ;1;1-:), Requested Land Use District ~ Vf ..- ".. Nmne of Applicant r:.,I~'f of. Andover Address {bC(S CfoSS-/owY\ t3/ud 1Uh/ AflrlOLer. 111/V 55:504 Home Phone 755.:::..5100 B~ess Phone - Fax 7 b f)-f{CfdJ Sign',",e ~_~ D,'e ~ 11., tZ<>oo PIN 153224440001.0 PIN 153224430004.0 PIN 233224220052.0 APEL MA YNARD D & ELEANOR M PUTNAM JERRY & GLORIA CAMBRIDGE CAPITAL INC OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 941 HILLWIND DR NE #301 1781157THLN 1869157THLN FRIDLEY, MN 55432 A'TT)OVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 153224340006.0 PIN 153224430003.0 PIN 223224240011.0 MURPHY CRAIG E & BRENDA L CARDINAL LAWRENCE J & J G OLSON ESTHER W 1965 107TH LNNW OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT COON RAPIDS, MN 55433 15785 NIGHTINGALE ST 15450 NIGHTINGALE ST ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 153224340008.0 PIN 223224210006.0 PIN 223224210004.0 MITCHELL RUSSELL & PAMELA GOETZ MICHAEL J & KIM M SATHER GARY M & JOAN E OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 2032 157TH LN 15629 OSAGE ST 15532 NIGHTINGALE ST ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANTIOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 153224430008.0 PIN 223224210007.0 PIN 223224110002.0 BLOOMSTROM SHELLEY JEAN MEAGHER ERIN J & DELANA S CHESTERTON PARTNERSHIP OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 3640 152ND LN 15711 NIGHTINGALE ST 15651 OSAGE ST ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 SCOTT OLMSTEAD HOMES GOR-EM, LLC STEVE KELLEY 10734 HANSON BLVD NW REMAX COON RAPIDS, MN 55433 10732 HANSON BLVD NW 3351 ROUND LAKE BLVD COON RAPIDS, MN 55433 ANOKA, MN 55303 / RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 15486 MARTIN STNW 15496 MARTIN STNW 1957 155TH AVE ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 RESIDENT JERRY SAARENPAA 15476 EAGLE ST NW 40826 COUNTY RD 311 ANDOVER, MN 55304 DEER RIVER, MN 56636 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: May 2.2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Item Planning ITEM NO. John Hinzman, SUP 00-02 City Planner Mining Permit 16449 Narcissus St D. B & L Finance Co. Request The City Council is asked to approve review the Special Use Permit request of B & L Finance Company to mine approximately 3,500 cubic yards of soil to create a pond at 16449 Narcissus , / Street NW, legally described at Lots 11 & llA TIMBER MEADOWS 2ND ADDITION (PIN 17-32-24-11-0008 & 08-32-24-44-0010). The property is zoned R-l, Single Fmnily Rural. Plannin2 and Zonin2 Commission Review The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 to approve the proposal at the April 11, 2000 meeting. Residents from the area had questions on how the project would affect the sun-ounding land and ditches. The Commission discussed how any negative impacts to sun-ounding land would be handled. Lower Rum River Watershed Mana2ement Organization Review The Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization approved the proposal at its April 18, 2000 meeting. Please see attached letter. Attachments . Resolution for approval . Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization letter - April 18, 2000 . Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - October 26, 1999 . Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report - October 26, 1999 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTYOFANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -00 A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF B & L FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. TO MINE SOIL PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 4.24 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16449 NARCISSUS STREET NW LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 11 & 11A, BLOCK 4, TIMBER MEADOWS 2ND ADDITION (PIN 08-32-24-44-0010 & 17-32-24-44-0010). WHEREAS, B & L Finance and Development, Inc. has requested a Special Use Permit to mine approximately 3,500 cubic yards of soil pursuant to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.24 on property located at 16449 Narcissus Street NW, legally described as Lots 11 & l1A, Block 4, TIMBER MEADOWS 2ND ADDITION; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 4.24; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the City of Andover; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit as requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with tlle recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the Special Use Permit on said property with the following conditions: 1. That safety precautions be taken at the end of each working day to prevent injury to playing children, bike riders and snowmobiler's, etc. 2. That the applicant provides the City with a security bond to hold harmless for restoration or other damages cause by mining and hauling of the site as determined by the City Engineer. 3. That appropriate traffic control be placed on site as deemed necessary by the City. 4. That the applicant only alters the topography to perform necessary mining operations. 5. That the roadway be watered to control dust. City Council Resolution Page Two Mining Permit - 16449 Narcissus St May 2, 2000 6. That the hauling of material be limited to Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Saturday 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. 7. That the applicant restores the banks of the mined area after excavation with approved topsoil, seed, and/or vegetation or brush to control erosion. 8. That the applicant obtain all necessary permits, including, but not limited to, the following organizations: Department of Natural Resources, Anoka County U.S. Am1y Corps of Engineers, and Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization. 9. That the permit be subject to an annual review and renewal by the City and be limited to 180 days from the adoption of the Resolution. 10. An erosion control plan must be devised and erected on-site before mining commences. 11. Upon 14 days from project completion, turf must be established via wood fiber blanket and disc anchored. 12. Maximum pond slopes are 4:1. 13. Work must be limited to Lots 11 and l1A only. 14. That the applicant provides proof of insurance for the mining work. 15. That the applicant prolongs the ditch connection until the pond excavation and grading is completed to minimize sediment runoff. 16. The City Engineer approves all erosion control and grading plans. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 2nd day of May, 2000. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: I.E. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria V olk, City Clerk - - -- -- J River Watershed Management Organization , Andover-Anoka-Coon Rapids-Ramsey 2015 First Avenue. Anoka, MN 55303 --- To: From: Barr Engineering Company Date: April 18, 2000 Re: Permit #2000-02: Erhart Phase 2 Pond Excavation: Andover We have received plans and a LRRWMO permit for the excavation of a ponding basin within a wetland area on Lot 11 of the Timber Meadows 2nd Addition in Andover. The purpose of this project is for aesthetics. Approximately 6000 cubic yards of material is to be excavated and the disturbed area is approximately 0.6 acres. The project is adjacent to County Ditch #6. The plans indicate that only excavation within the wetland is proposed - the requirements of the 1991 wetland Conservation do not apply to excavation only filling, The Corps of Engineers and the MiI1nesota Department of Natural Resources bas been contacted regarding the proposed project. It will be our recommendation that the LRRWMO approve of the permit for this project eubject to the following conditioDs: / 1. Erosion control measures must be installed at the initialatages of construction and be maintained until all areas altered on the site have been restored. 2. It is recommended that a rock filter dike, consisting of 1- lI.z inch washed gravel, be placed in the channel of County Ditch 6 during construction. This rock dike will provide an erosion control facility minim;",;ng material from being washed downstream.. At the completion of construction, the rock can either be removed and/or incorporated into the bottom sediments of the ditch. 3. The plans indicate that the basin is to be excavated to a dspth of approximately 10 feet. For safety purposes, it is recommended that a 10 foot bench, at a 10:1 slope, be constructed to a depth of 1 foot. It is recommended that the remaining side slope be constructed at a slope of 3:1 or flatter. 4. All material excavated must be either hauled off site and/or place above the limits of any wetland area. Erosion control measures must be installed at the limits of the disposal area. ** TOTAL PAGE.02 ** Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April]], 2000 Page ]0 : There was no other public input. Motion by Falk, seconded by Kirchoff, to close the public hearing at 8:30 p.m. Motion carried on a 7-ayes, O-nays, O-absent vote. Commission Kirchoff stated he was in favor of the lot split in addition to a future discussion of an easement for the landlocked lot east of this site. Chair Squires encouraged this issue to be determined between the landowners. Commissioner Hedin stated it might be in the Commissions' best interest to have these gentlemen address this issue and continue discussion after that time. Commissioner Daninger stated there might not be a hardship within this lot split and added that he would be in favor of tabling this item to the next Commission meeting until staff gained further information. Chair Squires asked that residents be notified of the Lot Split due to the fact this item would tabled for further discussion. Motion by Falk, seconded by Hedin, to table the lot split and variance request of Marvin Tobeck on property located at 16390 Valley Drive NW for further discussion at the April 25, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Motion carried on a 7-ayes, O-nays, O-absent vote. PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL USE PERMIT (SUP 00-02) - MINING PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A POND - 16449 NARCISSUS STREET NW - B & L FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. City Planner John Hinzman stated the Plarming and Zoning Commission is requested to review the Special Use Permit request of B & L Finance Company to mine approximately 3,500 cubic yards of soil to create a pond at 16449 Narcissus Street NW, legally described as Lots ll.and llA, Timber Meadows 2nd Addition. He presented an overview of the proposed project and explained iliat Ordinance No.8, Section 4.24, allows mining as a Special Use Permit in all zoning districts with the following conditions: A plan for finished grade which will not adversely affect the surrounding land or the development of the site on which the mining is being conducted; and that the route of trucks moving to and from the site. Mr. Hinzman added that Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, regulates the special use permit process and outlines the following criteria for review: 1) the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, I morals and general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding land; 2) the effect on. existing and Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April 11, 2000 , Page 11 anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land; 3) the effect on the values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area; and, 4) the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Hinzman reviewed the adjacent zoning and land use information with ilie Commission. Mr. Hinzman explained the site is adjacent to County Ditch No.6, which transverses north and west to ilie Rum River. He noted the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization (LLRWMO) would review the request on April 20th. He explained the applicant would need to define the number of truckloads and truck route. Mr. Hinzman indicated iliat Willimn Erhart of B& L Finance and Development, Inc. completed a 3,000 cubic yard mining permit northwest of ilie proposed site of in 1995. He stated additional permits might be needed from Anoka County, US Am1y Corps of Engineers, and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. An erosion control plan must be devised and erected on-site before mining commences. Mr. Hinzman stated the homes surrounding this site are roughly 450 feet from this site. He noted Staff recommends approval of the permit with conditions listed in the staff report and asked that the Commission discuss a timefrmne for this project. Commissioner Daninger asked if the $1,000 bond would be sufficient to cover the damage that may , / occur to the local roadways. Mr. Hinzman stated ilie Commission could recommend a higher mnount if deemed necessary and stated that $1,000 has been the mnount requested in the past. Chair Squires called for a recess at 8:43 p.m. and the meeting reconvened at 8:51 p.m. Motion by Hedin, seconded by Daninger, to open the public hearing at 8:52 p.m. Motion carried on a 7-ayes, O-nays, O-absent vote. Bonnie De/lIl, 16485 Tulip Street NW, explained she has 104 acres she farms organically in the area and indicated she was concerned with the sedimentation found within local ditches and the creek. She encouraged the $1,000 bond be increased to $10,000 to cover repair on ditch #6 as well as roadway repair. She noted the filtration ofthe ditch system is imperative to her organic farming. Chair Squires asked which direction the water flowed near the proposed pond. Ms. Dehn stated it flows to the south and west and then heads north to the Rum River. Commissioner Hedin asked how a disturbance would be determined within the creek and ditch system. Ms. Dehn stated the dark silting is very evident throughout the flow of the creek. Commissioner Falk asked if sedimentation would be leaving the proposed pond. Ms. Dehn stated if the pond were engineered correctly sedimentation should not leave the pond. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April 11, 2000 Page 12 Commissioner Daninger asked if the creek flows all year. Ms. Dehn stated there are several natural springs in the creek and it flows all year and has flooded in the spring on occasion. Commissioner Kirchoff asked how compensation would be found. Ms. Dehn stated the City needs to ensure that her riparian rights were kept in mind and iliat the waterways were not contaminated. She stated that if contmnination were found, she would seek compensation. Commissioner Kirchoff asked if the Planning and Zoning Commission was the right body to ensure this issue. Mr. Hinzman stated the County and Lower Rum River Water Management Organization (LRRWMO) had also been approached for appropriate permits for the mining. Paul Kreager 16430 Narcissus Street, expressed concern for the flooding of his backyard due to its low delineation. Mr. Hinzman noted the City Engineer and LRRWMO would address this issue. Allen Squires, 16397 Narcissus Street, explained that 3,500 cubic yards of dirt would be over 300 truckloads of dirt. Mr. Squires indicated this could dmnage Narcissus Street and other area roadways. Bill Erhart, applicant, reviewed the map location. He noted the proposed pond would be a sediment pond and would filter the water to improve its quality downstremn. Mr. Erhart stated the proposed pond would enhance the area with wildlife and improved views for neighbors. He noted that he has completed additional ponds in the City and that roadways were not dmnaged. Mr. Erhart added iliat he does have securities available to cover the several thousand dollars worth of damages that could occur. He stated the dirt would be transfen-ed via Round Lake Boulevard and that all black dirt would be disbursed to interested neighbors. Commissioner Dalien asked about a timefrmne for this project. Mr. Erhart stated the mining was a hobby for him and iliat he would like to have the SUl11IDer of 2000 and 2001 to complete ilie project. He explained the first SUl11IDer would complete the digging and the second year would allow for plantings and erosion control. Commissioner Hedin asked if the proposed ditch was larger or smaller than his previous projects. Mr. Erhart noted the proposed pond would be larger with approximately 300 truckloads of dirt to be removed from the site. Ms. Dehn suggested that a truck hauling sign or flag be placed near this site for the safety of local traffic. Mr. Hinzman stated this would be a condition within the resolution and that Anoka County would be reviewing this item as well. Commissioner Hedin indicated silting would be more of a concern if this project were to be completed over two SUl11IDers. Mr. Erhart stated the pond excavating could be done first to eliminate additional silting through the ditch system. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April 11, 2000 Page 13 Chair Squires asked why the pond would be attached to the ditch and not kept as a separate waterway. Mr. Erhart stated the flowing water would eliminate algae and allow fish to survive the winter. He explained the free flow of water keeps the water quality much cleaner. Commissioner Falk questioned the additional permits needed from the County and LRRWMO. Mr. Hinzman stated LRRWMO has to look at the technical engineering of the pond and the effects on the surrounding land. He explained that the County would address roadway concerns. Commissioner Daninger asked how flooding would be addressed. Mr. Hinzman stated that flooding would be addressed through the City Engineer and LRRWMO. Commissioner Daninger asked if guardrails would be placed between the pond and Round Lake Boulevard. Mr. Hinzman stated Anoka County would address this but that there is a 20-foot buffer zone. Mr. Erhart indicated he is looking to place trees in this buffer zone for public safety. There was no other public input. Motion by Daninger, seconded by Hedin, to close the public hearing at 9:28 p.m. Motion carried on a 7-ayes, O-nays, O-absent vote. Commissioner Dalien stated numerous issues are open that need to be addressed by other organizations. He explained the impact on City roadways and neighborhood streets should be addressed at this time. Commissioner Dalien encouraged Ms. Dehn to go to the April 20, 2000, LRRWMO meeting. He asked that the Commission increase the bond amount as well. Commissioner Falk and Kirchoff concurred. Commissioner Dalien explained he would like to see this project completed in one SUOU11er so local residents are not burdened with hauling trucks for two summers. Commissioner Falk asked where silting and sedimentation would flow for the first year if the project were not completed. Mr. Hinzman indicated silt fences would be put in place but that item would be addressed by other organizations. Commissioner Hedin stated he is not concerned with the truckload weight on Narcissus Street and encouraged the hauling trucks to use Narcissus Street. He explained that the other pond completed by the applicant was done in a safe and timely manner and that the roadway was not disturbed. He asked that the attachment of the pond to the creek not be done until the pond mining was completed. Commissioner Daninger asked that the timefrmne be changed from two years to one year. / Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April 11, 2000 Page 14 / Chair Squires stated the DNR is becoming proactive in water preservation and allowing waters to create wetlands. He explained they are taking action willi ilie water level condition because wetlands are impacted. Ms. Dehn noted that by using the ditch system it affects residents up and down stream for years to come. She encouraged the Commission to take this into consideration before approval or denial was granted. Ms. Dehn stated lliat as the land around her develops it would be difficult for her to maintain her farmland. Chair Squires summarized the concerns expressed as being the bond mnount needed, the traffic pattern for hauling trucks, traffic control, timeframe for project completion, if the connection can be postponed until the pond was completed, and proof of insurance while mining. He stated that many of the engineering items are beyond the Commission's scope but would be addressed by other organizations. Commissioner Hedin asked if the pond project could be completed within one year. Mr. Erhart stated this could be done and encouraged the Commission to review the status in November of 2000. Motion by Apel, seconded by Daninger, to recommend to the City Council approval of the Special , / Use Permit request for B & L Finance Company to mine approximately 3,500 cubic yards of soil to create a pond at 16449 Narcissus Street NW, legally described as Lots 11 and 11A, Timber Meadows 2nd Addition finding it meets the requirements of Ordinance 8 with the following conditions: 1. That safety precautions be taken at the end of each working day to prevent injury to playing children, bike riders and snowmobiler's, etc. 2. That the applicant provides the City with a security bond to hold harmless for restoration or other damages cause 'by mining and hauling of the site as determined by the City Engineer. 3. That appropriate traffic control be placed on site as deemed necessary by the City. 4. That the applicant only alters the topography to perform necessary mining operations. 5. That the roadway be watered to control dust. 6. That the hauling of material be limited to Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Saturday 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. 7. That the applicant restores the banks of the mined area after excavation with approved topsoil, seed, and/or vegetation or brush to control erosion. 8. That the applicant obtain all necessary permits, including, but not limited to, the following organizations: Department of Natural Resources, Anoka County U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization. 9. That the permit be subject to an annual review and renewal by the City and be limited to 180 days from the adoption of the Resolution. , . CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION DATE: April 11 , 2000 ITEM NO. 8 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Special Use Permit Planning SUP 00-02, Mining Permit 16449 Narcissus Street NW John Hinzman B & L Finance Company City Planner . Request The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the Special Use Permit request of B & L Finance Company to nline approximately 3,500 cubic yards of soil to create a pond at 16449 Narcissus Street NW, legally described at Lots 11 & l1A TIMBER MEADOWS 2ND ADDITION (PIN 17-32-24-11-0008 & 08-32-24-44-0010). The property is zoned R-l, Single Fmnily Rural. Applicable Ordinances Ordinance No.8, Section 4.24, allows mining as a Special Use Permit in all zoning districts with the following conditions: (A) A plan for fillished grade which will not adversely affect the surroUlldin.g land or the development of the site on which the mining is being conducted; and (B) The route oftrucks moving to and from the site. Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, regulates the special use permit process and outlines the following criteria for review: 1) The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the occupants of the sun-ounding lmld. 2) The effect on existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land. Special Use Permit 00-02 - Mining Aprilll. 2000 P & Z Report 16449 Narcissus St- B & L Finance Co. Page 2 of3 3) The effect on the values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area. 4) The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use Adjacent zoning and land use within 350' of the site include the following: North - R-l, Single Family Rural; nearest home - 450' East - Round Lake Blvd; R-3, Single Fmnily Suburban; nearest home - 250' South - R-l, Single Fmnily Rural; nearest home - 470' West - R-1, Single Fmnily Rural; nearest home - 450' General Review . The site is adjacent to County Ditch No.6, which transverses north and west to the Rwn River. . The Lower Rwn River Watershed Management Organization (LLRWMO) will review the request on April 20th. . National Wetland Inventory (NWl) Inventory wetlands exist downstream from the site along Ditch No.6. . The applicant will need to define ilie number of truckloads and truck route. . The City has required a $1,000 escrow for past mining projects. . Willimn Erhart ofB& L Finance mld Development, Inc. completed a 3,000 cubic yard mining permit northwest ofilie proposed site of in 1995. . Additional permits may be needed from Anoka County, US Army Corps of Engineers, and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. . Staff recommends a short project time frmne to better prevent adverse mining affects. . An erosion control plan must be devised and erected on-site before mining commences. . Upon 14 days from project completion, turf must be established via wood fiber blan.l<et and disc anchored. . . MaximUln pond slopes are 4: 1. . Work must be limited to Lots 11 and llA only. Commission Options The Planning and Zoning Commission may recol1U1lend one of the following options: 1. Recommend approval of the Special Use Permit, finding it meet the requirements of Ordinance 8. Special Use Permit 00-02. Mining April 11, 2000 P & Z Report 16449 Narcissus St- B & L Finance Co. Page 30f3 2. Recommend denial of the Special Use Permit, finding it does not meet the requirements of Ordinance 8. In recommending denial ofthe request, the Commission shall state those reasons for doing so. 3. Table the request pending further information. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval subject to the conditions on ilie attached resolution. Attachments . Resolution . Location Map . Site Plan . Site Pictures . Special Use Permit Application . Notice of Public Hearing CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -00 A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF B & L FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. TO MINE SOIL PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 4.24 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16449 NARCISSUS STREETNW LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 11 & l1A, BLOCK 4, TIMBER MEADOWS 2ND ADDITION (PIN 08-32-24-44-0010 & 17-32-24-44-0010). WHEREAS, B & L Finance and Development, Inc. has requested a Special Use Permit to mine approximately 3,500 cubic yards of soil pursuant to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.24 on property located at 16449 Narcissus Street NW, legally described as Lots 11 & l1A, Block 4, TIMBER MEADOWS 2ND ADDITION; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has / detern1ined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 4.24; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a detrimental effect upon the healtll, safety, morals, and general welfare of the City of Andover; and WHEREAS, tl1e Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to tl1e City Council approval of the Special Use Permit as requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council oftl1e City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Comn1ission and approves the Special Use Permit on said property with the following conditions: 1) That safety precautions be taken at the end of each working day to prevent injury to playing children, bike riders and snowmobilers, etc. 2) That the applicant provides the City with a security bond to hold harmless for restoration of the site as determined by the City Engineer. 3) That signs be placed to signal the presence of trucks hauling. / 4) That ilie applicant only alters the topography to perform necessary mining operations. 5) That the roadway be watered to control dust. ,. City Council Resolution Page Two Lot Split Lot I. Block 3, V ALLEY VIEW ESTATES 2ND ADDITION April 18, 2000 6) That the hauling of material be limited to Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Saturday 8:00 a.m. to 2 p.m. (7) That the applicant restores the banks of the mined area after excavation with approved topsoil, seed, and lor vegetation or brush to control erosion. (8) That the applicant obtain all necessary permits, including, but not limited to, the following organizations: Department of Natural Resources, Anoka County U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization. ~;.; . (9) That the permit be subject to an annual review and renewal by the City andf;e limited to * * insert time frame** from the adoption oftllis resolution. (10) An erosion control plan must be devised and erected on-site before mining commences. (11) Upon 14 days from project completion, turf must be established via wood fibre blan1<et and disc anchored. (12) Maximum pond slopes are 4: 1. (13) Work must be limited to Lots 11 and llA only. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 2nd day of May, 2000. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: I.E. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria V olk, City Clerk @ City of 16449 Narcissus St Andover Special Use Permit - Mining 16781 3SJ7 34S7 3409 il 33017 I 3289 I 3235 1I 3145 I 3109 I 3045 t 3009 I ms 1 167THIN ~ 187TH LN , 16735 III " 16723 3408 3318 3276 3230 3146 3110 3048 3008 2934 fn w r ~ :) . I 16680 3459 1 fl888 . 3405 3315 3ZI7 3231 0 Z 3179 \ 3537 ,.. ::::> 18678 0 I- 0:: 3133 k 3412 3354 9 111685 , 329ll <!\ 0 1 Il629 ~ - t1 kl '" 16858 . '" , '" ?t: ~ 3423 3321 18881 f- 3385 3544 ~ 2989 T 16~81 Iii uJApproximate 0 j 3482 3438 3386 r '4 . ~ J .~ 0 - :-.,..", Location 2 184~ ftl """"'~~ .,~ . - ,.".~- I 3125 3001 3051 3041 3021 . Iii 18485 ~~ 164TH LN ~ ::J ,,\ il43i\ CC. . I- II"~ .M - - 3020 1// ~?, f"\ ~ 3125 3105 3001 3031 ~, /]1 II 3021 2981 3363 li',\ =- ~ 164THAVE }3r-_ ._ ._~ d1 :..J In III 3153 3124 :5 31013 3Ol3O 3040 -Ii ~~ 0 z 0 "" 16340 ~ 3105 3372 3328 3260 ---- 163RD lr' 3055 3238 ~ 18315 16351 3126 3100 \ ~ ~. 3375 '" on on on '" '" 3319 3281 ... ~ ~ '" g 3055 3021 3233 3139 ;;; 0 ., '" '" '" \ ,;---., " lE12NDLN ~~..,.".. ~ 3388 16223 3180 ~Iii ------ --'- 3118 3098 3138 (/) 18191 18182 ::J 181n . \ In LEGEND ~~l\t r:~ N Sources: o ~50' Mailing Boundary f-rl "" !o;l ") fA. Andover Planning Andover GIS ~ Properties Notified Site Location If .~ ... :L- Anoka County GIS NSUbjecl Property _.c_..~." ~.>"'~. - .., C; t... C... I rtiir ~~~ 1 inch - 990 feet RF - 1:11.883 :w """- Map Date: March 27,2000 ...-" :;c-. GRADING PLAN. II - I . LOT 114/1/\ BLOCK. 4 TIMBER MEADO:WS 2ND. 'ADDIT ON ,I. . . .ANDOVER MINN. " ,..- ,", ," .. - . . II \ II I J I II' 'Ii II \ t41 Jl \ / J/ 1'- \ ~ \./ -~ i t. 1 \ : to <Xl :j .: <Xl : I I ~ It '. " . .. ," ' ", , -' :",;. . . ",' . . " :. . 'c' o ,.. , ',~ '", ", .,' ~,,:j{,:;~..: ,."." :: ',:'" ~_.}'.:: -. .r ",- CITY of ANDOVER '" " ',:,'>"'r,"", . ' 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W.. ANDqVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 7~5~5100 ',;.\',. . . :. ",' ,_ -" . "'.". .... , . .~: . '~'t'~,',-' :.:'.'.:":,'::'?,.:~..,:.. . , ' SPECIAL USE PERMIT' ". .... ,;, ,.-.,.,..,."'. -..-"....',.,' ,...:..... .... ....;;., . ........".,;,..'i.> ;f,;~~:.:t<:,~~;:i:;;~t'f0::';.'0t;~~:~li~~~i}~~; ."J':'" . P!OP~m:-.Ad~ess' 01i\eo .",t- ." .IV'1':'y"~,'",G~",,,...Y"" ',i~"'~';"" l!"~"""";:.~J11.~...,-';..J:,,J.!i:~.~~!:';}i~J.fJJV ',,' ~ ':. :",'. I '_'~' ;V'. \"":;~> ': ~~ ~~~~::.". ._ i" ';"';" ;:';.,;!..J~,< ~~''$..............t.,'l''.a(rJtt;)7J':>:-''..;; ~'''''I*f'1<l..';'':;r-..:''fl\r~'''~ ...t' ,(")'I~"_~.~;./:" :::"'''''\.'I';::''':l~r'->'';:.(~''!f'f'':;('r''~'~.b;~~(rl!;;:,~~~~${A;.f:'(..-r~r~",i: .:~......::}: :.-<./ ; <. ;: '.: ")\;/'::.-.::<~ {,.~~r-~:.:,--;:I~'1"'~"" .'J..~...,'~:\.~ ~~'~l".:..u;'!:... ,,:~:')':~~?:;\J~l:';:;; .~.1~~'~"" .~"&: ;.[;$!:.~:" 7--: .;.I.!.:;:'l~~.;.,~~~: ,~'/I,,:~J:' ~.:';i"~.. :'.;.:. ~~A: :i",,,~~'~ ~y '-:~,~"':~\ . ...,;:....t..:. ~ ?~.~.~'-.;,,~;::'~;'- " .'- -- LegiU Description of Property: (Fill iri whicheveris'approprlate) ': ," . ", .;' ';" ,;, ;'.'~>""'l;:::':":'" ::;:';~,. "';~ :"':':":' .' ..'. .. .,... ";"i,' .l....A ." ".,:".' ,~,o., ",<: ';..:.; :/:::"'d:,:,>~".'~.~.~,'~:;/j~:~'; '.'? ;~'.'~' ';-~~:>'l:~"~:<:<" L:~::l1;,;.~;;~~I~:-~/f?~;i0)JJilUl ';.,' ,...:. ,.,....::Lot.ff..:,~.)h.,I1':.;"..:t.BlocK"y, :,..:~;!::'~":'.td(Addition~'~"";'i~~""''>-?:;'''' '."f,c", ~l'<;~'?>~' ~k1i:;61il:';M:if~:q;, ":'.';:~~..::.: ,',;" ", ',':' L~t::'ii, ':: '. " :~;~ ?;~.";::i:i{~:,.,:~"j""-~~J:4:~""'.',~"\<:-'-::,~::'~:;.~~;':,~/:.~'.~';.;':.,::i.:~;:;t~:~;:f;:;;:;~i.~~2~;~i;.~i51y3~~.~:' . ..:,': . . .:. PIN'l~ ir"A '. ~ 7 ;; 1,.'?=> ~,'1..({... p.; ''';;' 0'0':" (' "'. .' ;'" ...., ,... "', ;--.. ;;.;,: . " -<, "'::",-;"."' .~J: 'J".i .=v:",,"," '.., .,',,-'::,: " ".~, oLw '. . , . ~,..... 1 ~ '-It ,... : 4 . K '.. >.'1" ~ ....'~., i'".........-..... :..;...~ '..:<';:' ',; ,', : " '-::: '. ;. (Ifmete's'alid bounds, attacli:tIie compI'ete legal description)'::::: :<.-:.: ' ../';::...-:",:;~;':'.~i.~;~;:"'~Z~>;' ,::; (,:~ ;.:::,::/:', ,:,. J, ~;; .,' ',:: ;:, .~_' ~:- \~: " ";:~:? \~:');~. <~~?:.~.,::,:;~,;::,q.,: :':{;~::I;,,::'i: :~'-.;t.:~: :t;'}})~;~j' ?:.~, ~V~f.'~: ;:.:~~~~~b~jfi~; :~~~fit!~~tt~~?~~~~~? :'.. :':' . ',;, :e~;'~::~~ n~~~c~~bri~~rre~:, ~~ ve~r~.;~"th~ '~,oKa Co~iy. ?~~7"at 32~~~r~::~.i::.;',,::~:},;,:, ': . '~::. :.: ~/13; 'Gr""'..Ii .)[ A~,{+r,....,.,..", ',.,.' ".",." .,'c"....:..,-.... . .' ..: v _.~ :::: : . ,.'. . '. t_ _.',:" . . _.;... '." - . .,... . '. -, ," ., :" 't" . . .: .'.:". i" . . '.. .' ~ ..' . . Abstract' .. Torrens ' ".. ' -', " .'. .. . ~.. Description of Request Iwi l-1(..(;-;~J.(:'. t?+- \)~:L w e-u.;;vLl (,,/t'G"" ", j) , .,. . ,., .. \ .\"~,.(I):)d(! (J ~V\<V.. (,,- ~ LJvita..cP C)\,\. t~~, .(,l)tLJ~4:;;t\ou: -1'\;,(./ . r'a V\ [Ai nJcf) k, {De)(Ca'vCL t4J 1"'1.1', $()'d - .7fh~ ~1()CJi-' n; rr ,,),., .lcP tN- edtv.r U(,~ cl- ~V'\ -tlr-clvt., . .r So Id, ~ $Ov,cJwovV be, os.r.-cfl 'lEJJ;Jf a 0ji:lct,y? pcJ-,d ,.' . .. . .... .. _ ....... . Section of Ordinance Cun-ent Zoning . R-c(';,))}ev'):IO!' -t3J'-rV'~uA-~", ~.lt:3t . ' .... Name of AppIlcant ~B ~ ;. t=" , \;,,1. \'\c.~ <;t U;, v,e) opw-.e V\- -r 1"Yi G Address~LR9 (')<<.Jt\./) 5't' 4k.-1 ~)W Signature q JJ . Dole '> Ii dO " SPECIAL USE PERMIT PAGE 2 Property Owner (Fee Owner) B ~t L ~1V\':'l\'t1 ~J O~ VVLbp Vv-Y'-' ~) -r~G' (If different from above) Address U" 'i ~f( Or~.d2 ~t JJ lA~,) ~ -1fO-o FaxlfJ-7-)) -7% Signature Date -dicrV I The following infoIDlation shall be submitted prior to review by the City of Andover: 1. Signed application and scaled drawing showing the following: a. Scale b. North arrow c. Dimensions of the property and structures d. Front, side, and rear yard building setbacks e. Adjacent streets f. Location and use of existing structures within 100 feet Application Fee: Commercial $250,00 includes mailing labels Residential $200.00 includes mailing labels Amended SUP $150.00 includes mailing lab els Public Notification Sign $25.00 Recording Fee: Abstract property $25.00 Torrens property $40.00 Date Paid Receipt # revised 10/29/99 g:/datafstafflmbarnettlsup.doc 3/14/00 ~ [!oi.{L.I,C{ !Vo.rc.<,su.ssi. P'IO+I '93224330009.0 PIN 83224440013.0 PIN 83224440012.0 Y ~:'>EL Y CHARLES J & JULIE E HUNTER DANIEL E & ROBEN D JAHN DAYTON C & KIMBERLY A C 'URRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1 \, _ ..L JONQUIL ST 16579 MARlGOLD ST 3290 165TH LN ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 83224440011.0 PIN 93224330010.0 PIN 83224440010.0 WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT CORP DEWEY ROB A & JULIE A ERHART WILLIAM 830 W MAIN ST OR CURRENT RESIDENT 16448 ORCHID ST NW ANOKA, MN 55303 16608 JONQUIL ST ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 163224220017.0 PIN 173224110007.0 PIN 163224220020.0 BORG JERRY L & TERESA L CURRENT RESIDENT ANDERSON ARL YCEA OR CURRENT RESIDENT 16430 NARCISSUS ST PO BOX 1018 16463 ROUND LAKE BLVD ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANOKA, MN 55303 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 163224220019.0 PIN 173224110009.0 PIN 173224110006.0 ROBINSON MICHAEL S & LISA P SQUIRES A D & LINGSWEILER L M MODEEN DANIEL J & BOERSMA C L OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 16437 ROUND LAKE BLVD 16397 NARCISSUS ST 3312164THAVE ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 163224220020.0 PIN 163224220021.0 PIN 173224110005.0 r-TRRENT RESIDENT SANGREN RlCHARD W & LAINE D HEYER BRUCE M & V ALERlE S /25 ROUND LAKE BLVD OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT Al'-TUOVER, MN 55304 16415 ROUND LAKE BLVD 16382 NARCISSUS ST ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 163224220022.0 PIN 173224110010.0 PIN 173224110010.0 JOHNSON JERRY D & MONICA L ASSURED CONSTRUCTION INC CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 1512 147TH AVE NW 3251163RDLANE 16405 ROUND LAKE BLVD ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER,MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 (5) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION j DATE: Mav 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Todd Haas,/, Engineering ITEM NO. Anoka County Ditch #6 Assessment Update Co. The City Council is requested to review the attached Ditch #6 water quality assessment that was prepared by the Anoka Conservation District. Staff only copied information that pertains to Ditch #6. * Page 2 provides conclusions and recommendations for the Lower Rum River Small Sub- Watersheds which includes Ditch #6. * Page 3 provides background and existing data about the Rum River. * Pages 4-8 provides definitions to be used when reviewing Pages 22-23. * Pages 22-23 provides the results of each of the different water quality assessments that , were performed, which includes Ditch #6. In discussing the results with the Anoka Conservation District, Ditch #6 is 1 of the 3 worst in terms of water quality. The other ditches are located in Anoka (Ditch #3) and Ramsey (Ditch #66). N _. _._~== ~=. =: __ _ _ 3!!!!!'::::e .. ~ ~I T-i..~ ! " "\p.85W J 1 :,:: i ...-:-.....-'/;;;1. -, "'":-: f ,'" " \' ~-;- -\ .. \...:. ': I ,! i, ,', ':. '::;'//:l ">_ \.--. I; ! I. I 436W.c. . J.u u ,0 ''-~ . I ..." /' ~2W .-:;:, ';:?- ~l ._r- ~ 1", ," 'i~'--r-_.m'l.--"l'-~~r:, : i ;' '0t~1 _.. /( \ :' ,,! -..~, i.!.TF C L :Jiii.".;;5I) 'i'. (~ L...l ._~. ...3~,tH[t-, .:.. _.1 'I' 392W ~ ~. \::-, roo' . j , ", 393W ,-~\ ,_..L._._... j i / 695W". ~ -"1 ' i I - -t....,\.. _, r' .,./-.----.i 386W ;." ,j.' , ' r........!' ,-. .,., 1'-'''. I' ',' r ':", ";\ECFI'''',l._::~:t=! ;...L_1J:-',:si~:__>-; i-. ~'3.::') : \ .../ ~85P I'" (" , .~~,-...,._--.. . , ". '-'"' f\./.".FC q9tl!"1 1"=5000' ". .. . . --' ,. .." ...., . rw 0-,~ ,......,-.1 >. ~".. i I 403W! Lei E .. "'>,~'315 W - i-;~:j'-=I 3: '," 4E:J~ ~ii'2W'! : ~..I:: __ _/ , , 407.W/--..'" I ,...-. I > h -- "'.--88W~ ,,'." 00;;;7 'y L.... ~- ..~, _ j \., I -./~:' --1 . ::;,209' ,- / "---..'.'" .,..,.,-" '-- I. 41. -~"~.'+~::i=gL-:....L7;fiFh \\.+' : I' "- ~ . '..' - I 410W" ~J--'-b"-'-' - I =.:: 'i \ tl i LL5Li 415W./ ~:" 'y:. .', "'\"". l 411 II': /:i28W:t' : V27W r' :-i...../-.:.i './ 413lf... ~ , "., i ::=,.' i ..~"'--(29W I : '~ ! .",...;' '. I" . . i ,., .,...... '" . .' j -. " .,/22.,...........----.1-.' ~.~"C:5 (, "vJOi~ o,'""c.\.. L.~ .".. LEGEND ! 6/ijW - - - - - CITY BOUNDARY - - - - WMO BOUNDARY /-S:;.i;:::, " A c..... MINOR WATERSHED BOUNDARY : \\\\\!j'61)?Wiii <.. : i.i \ \." ';, . ...1..J SUBWATERSHED BOUNDARY -"'-"'-...- PUBLIC DITCH MINNESOTA DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES 631W PROTECTED WATER DESIGNATION -'-'-'-'-.-PROTECTED WATER COURSE r=EjiJH!.!. I:&; -1.-.r-, ;::L.i-.f:' 631 w: I r'~~[~L~t.;:;.:.f:rJ. ~ J '; - NOTE: THIS FIGURE INTENDED TO ILLUSTRATE i ~.__m.'... i' PUBLIC WATERS WITHIN THE WATERSHED. ~~~~/:j.:5 . RUM RIVER DAM FOR PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF PUBLIC WATERS, ,.~.'" USE FULL SIZE WETLAND MAPS AVAILABLE AT ., " "1/ r'. . .~~~ THE OFFICE OF DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES. " .:,::- FIGURE NO. 4 LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION PUBLIC WATERS & WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN PUBLIC DITCH SYSTEMS I t>t~ ~) W,,\.~i> Lower Rum River Small Sub-Watersheds c.~ I Conclusions: Excessively high conductivity and chloride concentrations in all three ditches / suggest significant impact by human activity. These three watersheds are the most intensely I' developed ofthe watersheds smnpled. Ditch 66 was the only site monitored that exceeded the Rum River in its concentration of total suspended solids. Recommendations: An inventory of landuse, potential pollution sources and potential sites for I remediation should be considered for Ditch 6, Ditch 66 and Ditch 3. These sites should be considered for routine water quality monitoring. I Rum River Watershed Conclusions: The Rum River has exceptional water quality. I Recommendations: Focus monitoring and analysis on the problem tributaries. Conduct periodic monitoring periodic monitoring upstremn and downstremn. I IMPLEMENTATION BUDGET Upper Rum River WMO Activity ! Cost ! Quantity! Frequency I Total - Periodic Monitoring of3 Watersheds I $500 I 3 i Every 5 years I $1500.00 -Routine MonTtoring-o['nVatershedS-------r-$-SOOr----4-----r--Every -2-y-ears-r---$2-6-6-o~60 I -Cedar Creek Watershed land Use-------T$6000! ----1-r----T-----r-$6000~OO- Inventory . __ i j i . Ford Brook Watershed Reconnaissance I $2000 I 1 I 1 I $2000.00 (/ Lower Rum River WMO Activity I Cost I Quantity i Frequency I Total I I Periodic Monitoring of2 Watersheds i $500 I 2 I Every 5 years i $1000.00 }zl?~tlne Monitoring oITWatershedS--I=--$5o(fl_=] - J__Every2 years -r$Isoo,oo- Trott Brook Cation and Anion Analysis I $500 I 1 ill $500.00 I Land Use Inventory of Ditch 27 -~2500 I 1 [~----\-$2500.00 Watershed I ! II Land Use Inventory of Ditch 6 -\ $2500r- 1 \----T----:--$2500.00 Watershed _ _ ' Ii. I . .' _.__ ._ _._._.__.~_______~._.____.__..___._.__._-.--~--..------.-1-.---.-------.-...-..---...-.--.--..,,.,-- _._.n -- Land Use Inventory of Ditch 66 ! $2500 II! 1 !-$iS-oo.oO II Watershed Iii i j , . ; L",d U" Invontory ofDitoh 3 -IlfSOO r I l-----r-~oo.oo. Watershed I I i II Pollution Source Inventory of Ditch 6 I $2000 I 1 1 I $2000.00 Pollution Source Inventory of Ditch 66 _ $2000 I ~ I 1 \-f2000.00 Pollution Source Inventory of Ditch 3 $1200 I 1~ 1 $1200.00 2 I, " I BACKGROUND From its origins in Lake Mill Lacs to its confluence with the Mississippi, the Rum River stretches 145.7 miles and has a watershed of nearly one million acres. The Anoka County I' portion of the watershed is 116,800 acres (Lower Rum - 35,840 acres, Upper Rum - 80,960 acres). The natural attributes of the Rum River, its scientific value, rich history and recreational potential resulted in its enrollment in the state wild, scenic and recreational river program. I Along its course, the designation of the river changes many times but even through Andover and Rmnsey it is designated Scenic and Recreational. One of the outstanding natural features of the river is its unusually high concentration of gmne fish. The river attracts canoeists, fishermen, I hunters and other recreationists to its waters. I EXISTING DATA Over the years, the Rum River has been monitored extensively for water quality. Data exist for the Rum River crossing as Pleasant Street in Anoka beginning in the 1950's. Substantial data I from the 50's, 60's, 70's and 90's have been obtained from the MPCA STORET database. Additionally, Anoka Conservation District is involved the Met Council's paired watershed outlet monitoring progrmn whereby ACD collects water samples for analysis at the confluence of the I Rum River and the Mississippi River. Also, data were collected in 1969 in Trott Brook near Nowthen and in Cedar Creek near Anoka. I Commonly analyzed parmneters include: .:. Temperature .:. Dissolved Oxygen .:. Stremn Flow .:. Total Alkalinity .:. Total Phosphorus .:. Turbidity I: .:. Total Chloride .:. Total Suspended Solids .:. pH / The Rum River Watershed is located in the North Central Hardwood Forest Ecoregion. This I region was designated because it has similar climate, vegetative cover and geology. Water quality in stremns and lakes within this ecoregion can be compared because they have similar environmental influences. Differences in water quality are more or less attributed to land use I and land management practices. Data have been compiled that identify the range and mean value for selected water quality parmneters for the ecoregion and for minimally impacted surface waters in the ecoregion. I The following charts identify the historic maximum, minimum and median values of water quality data for several parmneters monitored in the Rum River at the Pleasant Street crossing in I Anoka. When possible, the data are grouped by decade to illustrate trends. Whenever available, the mean metro area, ecoregion and/or minimally impacted stremn values are shown as a horizontal line. Some of the charts present the data as a line. This was done when the I available data were gathered over a shorter duration. I The following charts include; Total Phosphorus, N02 & NO) - N, pH, Conductivity, Dissolved Oxygen, Five Day Biological Oxygen Demand, Turbidity, Total Residue, and Total Dissolved Solids. I I I 3 -.-.--. -.-------..- Ii I: Total Phosphorus (TP) - Phosphorus is a nutrient that is often the limiting factor in plant growth. Sources of phosphorus include decomposing organic matter, fertilizers, phosphate- I based cleaning products, septic systems, animal waste, and eroded sediment. Total phosphorus I. . concentrations have decreased significantly since the 1960's and 1970's. Not only has the : median concentration fallen below that of minimally impacted streams in the ecoregion, but also the range between the minimum and maximum values has been drastically reduced. 1\ ____.________n__~______~._________.__. Total Phosphorus at Pleasant St. I 0.6 - 0.5 - I ~ 0.4 - ::l ~ o -a 0.3 ----------------' I ~ 0.2 '3 o I I- 0.1 o 1960's (39 samples) 1970's (80 samples) 1990's (36 samples) I _Max 0.44 0.54 0.17 . :- .Min -:__~~-~-::~---::_-.-=~~==--. ~IT ______ O~04s.-.-. _.:~~.I. '.~-:--_:--=~.~~.;:=-.:"..:. -..:-..- _Median 0.18 0.136 I 0.1055 ...........Metro Area Mean ..-------- --~231------- :----.---..'-;231 -- -.--.--:- ---0-."2'31--- -... .. -+-NCHF Ecoregion Mean --- 0.22 -r----.--O.22----------!-------O.22---.-.-~. ... I / i __HCHF Minimelly Impacted Mean 0.13 I -------0-:-i3------...t-n--- -- 0-:-'3'-------- ----- N02 & N03 - Nitrogen - These are oxidized forms of nitrogen. Nitrogen is another nutrient I utilized in plant growth. It is often abundantly available and so is not typically a limiting factor. High N03 levels in drinking water can cause problems with children, the elderly and pregnant women. Sources of nitrogen include decomposing organic matter, fertilizers, precipitation, I septic sy:tems, and ani;nal.waste. Concentr~tions have ~e:reased. significantly sinc~ the 1970's. . The median concentration IS now approachmg that of mmlmally Impacted streams m the I. ecoregion and is well below the median for the entire ecoregion. The maximum concentration has decrease by approximately 33%. N02 & NO 3 - N at P Ie a san t St. I 1.6 1 .4 ...nn....___m____ I ~ , 2 nnmu_____ - . ~ 1 , ... I: 0.8 II ! ~ 0.6 '- I t5 : 0 0.4 z I 0.2 ~ 0 1970's (8 umplU) 1990's '46 umplu) _Un 1.5 1 r:=2Uin 0.01 0.01 I _Mediln 0.515 0.2 '__. .......-NCHF Ecoregion Mun C.aa C.aB -.-NCHF Minimally Impacted Mean 0.1a 0.16 I 4 I I: J pH- This test is to see if water was basic or acidic. A pH reading of greater than 7 means the water is basic and a reading of less than 7 means the water is acidic. Most invertebrates and fish I' need a pH above 7 in order to be viable. pH values are the least changed of the parameters. Although insufficient recent data are available for comparison in this manner, it is likely that the 1990's would result in similar values. The water has a high buffering capacity and so pH does I not change rapidly or drastically. -~.- ---_._------_.._.__._---_._._---~-- - pH at Pleasant st. I 10 9 B I 7 6 J'J 'c 5 ::> :I: 4 I 0. 3 2 1 I 0 I 1 Sleo's (4i sam pies) 1910's (80 SI m pies) \_M~~ ... + ... . .5 ... 7.' --~------ 7 t=::IM In . 7.. --- I "-- I_Median 7.. I l~NCHF Minimally Imp.cled Mean .., .., 1=-- 5.1 i- t- , I Conductivity- Conductivity is a water quality parameter often measured in surface waters. It is proportional to the amount of ions and their respective charges dissolved in the water. This test is to see how much dissolved matter (organic and inorganic) is in the stream. Higher readings I usually mean inputs from somewhere other than natural sources. These inputs could range from failing septic systems to agriculture and urban storm runoff. Conductivity has not made any improvement over the years. This is likely due the fact that conductivity in the Rum River has I always been reasonably low for the ecoregion. _.. .__ ____.____________________ ________________ ~__._______ - . __._____u___. .'_U" . -.-.- I Conductivity at Pleasant St. 700 I 600 -;; 0 500 .<: E 2- 400 I ~ ;g 300 u ~ .., 200 c 0 <..l Ii 100 0 1960's (20 SImples) 1990's (46 samples) _Max 400 480 I c:::::::IM in 120 140 170 _Median 290 280 320 i --*-M 8tro Area M san 609 609 609 ....-...-NCHF Ecoregion Mean 389 389 389 I ___N C H F Minim ally 1m paeted Mean 298 298 298 ------- ------ II 5 Dissolved Oxygen (D.O.)- This test is for the amount of oxygen that is dissolved into the water. , Dissolved oxygen is needed for all living aquatic organisms from a snail the size of a pinhead to / a world record muskie. The lower the reading the less likely a water-body or water-coarse is to support a wide range of organisms, except for the undesirables such as carp and leeches. D.O. can be added to the water by stream turbulence and plant photosynthesis. Decomposing organic - matter, plant respiration, chemical reactions with nutrients and oxidation of metals, can deplete D.O. Median D.O. concentration continue to decline while the range between the maximum and minimum is generally greater than those on record since the 1950's. I ---------- D.O. Concentrations at Pleasant St. " ______________ .________.... .. n. I " ._-~------- i , , I l 0 0 I , , II 0 1950', (31 ..m plea) 1960', (49 .Im pll') 1970', (80 ..m plel) 1990', (4T ..m pl..) .MI. 13 " 15.7 13.5 I .M edl,n ... ... ... U I aMin . , 2.3 2.' ! I.' S Day Biological Oxygen Demand (BODS) - BODS is a measure of the oxygen consumed by biological organisms in a sample over a five day period. BODS typically increase along with III nutrients that promote plant growth and consumption of organic matter by zooplankton. BOD decreases similarly to total phosphorus and nitrate/nitrite. -- ------ B.O.D. at Pleasant St. 12 -- 10 'a, 8 III .s ,.. .. 6 0 '" ci 4 0 III ai 2 II 0 1950's (31 1960's (49 1970's (80 I 1990's (37 sam pies) sam pies) samples) sam pIes) _Max 4.9 [ 7.5 11 I 4.9 c::=1M in 0.7 I 0.8 0.5 i 0.5 III I _Median 2.8 I 3 2.aS I , .8 , I I , ~NCHF Minimally Impacted Mean 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 I -- I I , III II 6 I I Turbidity - Turbidity is the measure of water clarity. The more turbid the water, the less transparent it is. Turbidity is a qualitative measure of the amount of suspended solids in the water. The data suggest a drastic decrease in turbidity since the 1960's. Some of this is I ' attributed to a change in the method of testing, which altered the turbidity unit scale. A simple conversion is unfortunately impossible. Since the 1970's, water clarity has improved substantially. Ie __.________________u____. I Turbidity at Pleasant St. I 70 I I 60 .'!l 50 .-----------------------..--- ----..-- --- --.. I ;g 40 ~ ~ 30 .c :; I I- 20 10 II _Max 0 48 ! 65 '21 4.8 _.... ...______._ __ ___n___ ___~- ____________1 _u_________-------- c:=::JMin 1.6! 1.5 i 2.5 25--'- .---- _.--~--~--------_._- ---:------------_.~----j--- --_._-------------.-"---------- --- I = ~~~-FM;ni~llY Impacted Me;; - --. -+;- --- --t-------~~----- -r ".- -.. ~}--...- T------ 3; 1t-- ( , Total Suspended Solids (TSS) - As the name indicates, TSS is the quantitative measure of total suspended solids presented as milligrams per liter. TSS is composed of organic and II inorganic materials suspended in the water column. Sediment, leaf litter, aquatic plants and zooplankton comprise the majority of the solids. Sediment originates from overland runoff, erosion along streambanks and erosion of the streambed. Insufficient data exist to present the II data by decade. The heavy black line in the chart below is a statistically derived trend line. This shows a gradual decrease in TSS from the 1950's to the 1970's. More data are needed in . the 1990' s to determine recent trends. II I 320 . ~ 280 - I ,[ 240 CJ) 200 CJ) II I- 160 120 M ~ ~ ro ro moo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ ~ ~ m m ~ ~ t::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ 0 ro ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m M m m m _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ro N ~ ~ N m ~ ro M ~ ~ N : \ -r-"""- ......- I III I-RESIDUE TOTAL (MG/L) Linear (RESIDUE TOTAL (MG/L)) J I II 7 ----.---- I: I Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) - TDS is a quantitative measure of the solids that are dissolved in the water column. In the NCHF Ecoregion, TDS is primarily composed of calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na) and chloride (CI). Some of these are to be expected in the water I because soils contain calcium, magnesium, and nominal levels of sodium and chloride. For the most part, however, high sodium and chloride levels are a result of pollution. Road salts, household cleaning products, human waste and animal wastes are the primary sources. High I TDS levels may be a result of background Ca and Mg but are likely pollutant related. TDS is usually monitored to determine if there is a need to monitor individually for CI and Na. There is a large difference between the maximum and minimum concentrations ofTDS, which suggest I storm related pollutant loading. Generally, however, levels ofTDS have decreased substantially since the 1960' s. I I' i Total Dissolved SoUds at Pleasant SL sampling pL , I ". I I .. " I i .. il I " , I I / I , . I I I o.w;~ I .M...... I I I I I I I I 8 degradation of the Rum River, they are well within acceptable limits and well below the ecoregion means. -11' Lower Rum River Small Sub-Watersheds The small sub-watersheds in the Lower Rum River WMO include Co. Ditch 6, Co. Ditch 66 and Co. Ditch 3. Ditch 6 is located in northern Andover and flows into the Rum River just downstream of Cedar Creek. Ditch 44 is in central Ramsey and flows into the Rum River II downstream of Trott Brook. Ditch 3 is in Anoka and flows into the Rum River downstream of CR 116. One monitoring station was used for each ditch and they are compared to the Rum River at the Rum River Central Regional Park. II l2H. in the Rum River at Rum River Central Regional Park fluctuated between 7.33 and 8.73. The three ditches fluctuated at a lower range with mean pH values between 7 and 8. II Conductivity in the Rum River at Rum River Central Regional Park varies little and was at all times below the minimally impacted stream value of 300 umhos/cm for the ecoregion. The three II ditches also fluctuated little but are all at high conductivities. Ditch ~, Ditch 66 and Ditch 3 have mean conductivity of 470, 551, and 490 urnhos/cm respectively. All of these levels are substantially higher than any of the other sites sampled. The mean conductivity for all streams in III the ecoregion is 389 umhos/cm. Turbidity in the Rum River at Rum River Central Regional Park averaged 21.5 TU's and ranged ~/ from 11 TU's to 29 TU's. Mean turbidity in Ditch 6 and Ditch 66 was higher than the value for minimally impacted streams in the ecoregion (7.1 turbidity units - TU's) but much better than the I Rum River. Ditch 3 had the highest turbidity with an average of24 TU's. Dissolved oxvzen is important for aquatic life and integral in several chemical processes. Ideally II dissolved oxygen levels will fluctuate between 8 mg/l and 12 mg/l. If dissolved oxygen falls below 4 mgll, fish kills can occur and phosphorus may be chemically release from soil particles. Dissolved oxygen in the Rum River at the Rum River Central Regional Park fluctuated between II, 7.23 mg/l and 11.92 mg/l with a mean of 10.16, which is good. Dissolved oxygen levels in all three ditches were nearly identical, ranging from 6.7 mg/l to 9.6 mg/l with an average of 8.5 mgll. All sites had lower dissolved oxygen concentrations then the Rum River. I Totalvhosphorus for minimally impacted streams in the ecoregion is .13 mg/l. The mean for the ecoregion is .22 mg/l. Rum River at Rum River Central Regional Park ranged from .06 mgll to I .12 mg/l with a mean of .09 mg/l, which is exceptionally low. The mean total phosphorus concentrations for all three sites were below that of the Rum River. Only Ditch 6, with a maximum total phosphorus concentration of .17 mg/l, exceeded the maximum value recorded in II: the Rum River. Total susvended solids in the Rum River at Rum River Central Regional Park averaged 18.25 II mgll. Total suspended solids in all three of the ditches averaged less than the Rum River. Ditch 6 was the best of the three with a mean concentration of only 8 mg/l. -- ; - II, I 22 I I, , Chloride is the parameters most associated with human impacts. Minimally impacted streams in I' the ecoregion have a mean chloride of 8 mg/l. Rum River at Rum River Central Regional Park had a mean chloride concentration of8.85 mg/l. Chloride concentrations in each of the ditch systems far exceed those of the rest of the sampling sites. Ditch 6 has a mean chloride 1 concentration of34.75 mg/l, Ditch 66 has a mean chloride concentration of 51.5 mg/l, and Ditch 3 has a mean chloride concentration of 110 mg/l. Each of the three ditches contributes to degradation of the Rum River according to chloride concentrations. Noteworthy, is that only one I sample was possible from the Ditch 3 site. Also, the high chloride from Ditch 3 may be attributed to a chlorinated municipal water supply. I Conclusion: Excessively high conductivity and chloride concentrations in all three ditches suggest significant impact by human activity. These three watersheds are the most intensely developed of the watersheds sampled. An inventory of landuse, potential pollution sources and I potential sites for remediation should be considered. Ditch 66 was the only site monitored that exceeded the Rum River in its concentration of total suspended solids. I Rum River Watershed Rum River was directed sampled in four locations: at 249th St. in Isanti County, at Rum Riv Central Regional Park, at the overpass of Co. Rd. 116, and just below the Anoka Dam. I d fairly consistent throughout the course of the river with a mean I- I Conductivity in t Rum River varies little and was at all times ne or below the minimally impacted stream va of 300 umhos/cm for the ecoregion. Th ean conductivity for all I streams in the ecoregio is 389 umhos/cm. I Turbidity in the Rum River eraged 22.5 TU's and ged from 10 TU's to 32 TU's. It changed very little from upstream to do stream. Minim y impacted streams in the ecoregion have a turbidity of7.1 turbidity units. I Dissolved oXVQ'en is important for aqu . c life and integral in several chemical processes. Ideally dissolved oxygen levels will fluctu bet een 8 mg/l and 12 mg/l. If dissolved oxygen falls I below 4 mg/l, fish kills can occ and phosp rus may be chemically release from soil particles. Dissolved oxygen in the R ver fluctuated tween 7.23 mg/l and 11.92 mg/l with a mean of 9.8 mg/l, which is good. Issolved oxygen levels all sites were very similar. I Totalvhosvhorus 1) minimally impacted streams in the co region is .13 mg/l. The mean for the ecoregion is .22 gJl. Rum River ranged from .06 mg/l to . mg/l with a mean of .15 mg/l, I which is fairl ow. Total s ended solids in the Rum River averaged 16 mg/l. I conc tration from upstream to downstream. hloride is the parameters most associated with human impacts. Minimally impacted streams in I the ecoregion have a mean chloride of 8 mg/l. Rum River had a mean chloride concentration of I 23 ~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION " ) DATE: Mav 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Item Todd Haas,~ Engineering ITEM NO. Reconsider RequesUStreet Lights/Langfeld's Oakridge Estates ,. Willis Langfeld, developer of Langfeld's Oakridge Estates and owner of Lot 1, Block 1 has requested to be heard regarding street lights. Attached is Mr. Langfeld's letter. If the City Council recalls, this same issue was discussed on May 18, 1999. Attached are the meeting minutes and backup information for your review. If you have questions, feel free to contact me at 767-5131. \ , J Note: Attached is a letter sent to Mr. Langfeld stating that this is on the agenda for discussion. " / RECEIVED " , ":f [ MAR 2 A 2IIllI 2207 - 161 Avenue NW Andover, MN 55304 ._...-.--~----- , (""'" ...~. -, j"'n\''''H 1 "'l".:~1...~,,~<;!.t., March 22, 2000 .,..... . ..--- "'. City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 RE: Street Light Dispute Dear Sir or Madam: If your will, please put my dispute on the next council meeting to be heard. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Sincerely, --...' WWUdm cc: Babcock, Neilson, Mannella, LaFleur & Klint, PLLP . - -- .~. r-. " . ( CITY OFANDOVER ., REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DA TE: Mav 18. 1999 . AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Item Todd Haas, ~ Engineering ITEM NO. The City Council is to be updated in regard to the Street Lighting Program as requested by the City Council at the last Council meeting. General Information The street lighting program started back in 1986. All new developments (urban and rural) thereafter are required to have street lights. In the urban area street lights are spaced approximately one every 300 feet. In the rural area street lights are spaced approximately one every 600 feet. Also, most intersections within the developments themselves also have street lights. Questions 1. Are the developers responsible to pay for street light and installation? Yes they are. The developers are paying for about 35% of the cost up front. The remaining 65% is paid from the portion 'Of fees that are collected over time with the quarter billing which shows up in the maintenance and energy charge which is sent to the property owner. 2. How do the developers know that they are responsible for paying for the street ligHt and installation of the lights? It is written into aI/ development contracts (see attached page from Langfeld's Oakridge Estates development contract). 3. Is it possible that the developer will pay for more than one lot for the ongoing energy and. . maintenance of the lot? Yes it is. The developer is responsible to pay this until they sel/ the lot at which time they would need to contact Connexus Energy to tell them of the new lot owner. 4. . Who paid for the street lights located at County road intersections? 'The City pays for the initial installation and also the energy and ongoing maintenance at aI/lights located on a County road intersection/City street intersection and also County road/County road intersections. 5. Are all the lights owner by Connexus Energy? No. There are a few street lights located on signals that the City owns. If they are in need of repair, the City has an agreement with Connexus Energy to repair them for a flat fee of $50. , / 6. How many street lights currently exist in the program? Currently about 1,000 (aI/lights) 7. Do all neighborhoods have street lights? No. There are a number of neighborhoods that were d.eve[Qoed orior to 1986 that QQ. (Jot have sjreel fjgbts. Tfjea;..b~gtw.Clr:hQ'ld..s1lJ.aJ:..exjsL ~ 'prior to 1986 that have petitioned for and are paying for the instal/ation and ongoing energy and I maintenance of the lights. . '. . 8. Has the City Council been consistent since 1986 that the neighborhood that have lights pay for the~ ~ , lights? Yes. The City Council has indicated that the benefit of street lights goes to the property owner no different than if a neighborhood has municipal water and sanitary sewer. Note: There was a question in regard to corners that have both frontage along a County road and City street. Past practice on all developments has been if there are corner lots and are part of the development, they will be responsible to pay for ongoing maintenance and energy of the lights. There are numerous other developments very similar to this. If you have questions, feel free to contact me at 767-5131. I will also be at the meeting to answer any other questions that the City Council may have. / ~ - H. The Developer shall furnish street lights in accordance with the City's Street Lighting Ordinance No. 86. The Developer shall conform to Ordinance No. 86 in all respects. The City shall order the street lights and Developer shall reimburse the City for such cost. General Requirements: 1. Street lighting shall be owned, installed, operated and maintained by the electric utility company. City and electric utility company shall enter into a contractual agreement on the rate and maintenance of the street lighting system. 2. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer to: a. Advise all lot purchasers of their responsibility for street lighting operating charges. b. Pay for street light charges for all lots owned by the Developer. \. The Developer shall dedicate and survey all storm water holding ponds as required by the City. The Developer shall be responsible for storm sewer cleaning and holding pond dredging, as required, by the City prior to completion of the development. . J. The Developer shall be responsible for securing all necessary approvals and permits from all appropriate Federal, State, Regional and Local jurisdictions prior to the commencement of site grading or construction and prior to the City awarding construction contracts for public utilities. K. The Developer shall make provision that all gas, telephone and electric utilities shall be installed to serve the developmen't. L. Cost of Developer's Improvements, description and comp letion dates are as follows: Description of Improvements Estimated Cost Date to be Completed 1. Site Grading and Erosion Control. $ $7;0.0':;' tl(..oh>ber~' 3'" l'f?& 2. Street Maintenance. $ 2.Sb. &>0 I 3. Street Construction. $ 2.;;0, e>o 4. Storm Sewer Construction. $ ;zo(),OO 5. Lot Stakes. $ .1 (;(:) , elO '-IJ , . CITY OF A."iDOVER . ,. ..:..!....- COUN'TY OF A.'\iOKA STATE OF ~fI1'-;NESOTA .- . - ORDINAL'\iCE NO. 252 , An Ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 86 adopted May 3, 1988. .~7"*' _.'"":'1__M . ~. " .. AN ORDLNA:."lCE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISffi"fENT OF A rvfUNICIPAL STREET LIGHTLNGSYSTEM; THE OPERATION AND J\.fAINTENA1'\iCE OF A STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM AND THE COLLECTION OF THE COSTS FOR SUCH SERVICE PROVIDED BY THE MUNICIPALITY AS A SPECIAL ASSESSNfENT AGAINST THE PROPERTY BENEFITED AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. General Operation. The City of Andover does hereby make a provision for the establishment of a municipal street lighting system. The areas to be served shall be determined and approved by the City Council. Section 2. Rates; Fees and Chare:es. The City Council shall adopt a resolution which indicates a schedule of all rates, fees and charges for an street lighting service provided to resiqents. This resolution may be amended from time to time to indicate any necessary change in rates, fees and charges. . Section 3. Damae:e to Svstem. No unauthorized person shall remove, damage~ alter or tamper any structure or part of a street lighting system. Section 4. Efficiencv of Street Lie:htine: System. '" The City shall not be liable for any deficiency or failure in supply of light to residents, \vhether occasioned by shuning off the system for the purpose of making repairs or connections or from any other cause whatsoever. Section 5. Payment of Charl!es. '~Nre"~aymefl'~T--6'V'e1"pa:i'rrl'e't1't\Yf'c'h'arges may Be relameCl oy the City ana appl1'eCf"'on. subsequent quarterly charges. Section 6. Penaltv for Late Payment. ( If a quarterly service charge is not paid when due, a penalty of ten (l0%) percent shall'be added thereto. Section 7. Action to Collect Cbames. On or before September 1st of each year, the City Clerk shall list the total unpaid charges 'for street lighting services against each separate lot or parcel to which they are attributable under this Ordinance. After notice and hearing as provided in Minnesota Statutes 429.061, the City Council may spread the charges against the benefited property as a special assessment under Minnesota Statutes 429.10 I and other pertinent statutes for certification of the County Auditor and coIlection along with the current taxes the following year. Section 8. En!!ineerine- Department. The Engineering Department shall assume and discharge the responsibilities imposed by this Ordinance, along \\ith such other duties as may be required or assigned to the . Dep.artment. Section 9. Validity. C . If any section, subsection, sentence, or phrase of this Ordinance is for' any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining portions of this Ordinance shall not be affected. Section 10. Penalt". .'~llY person, firm or corporation who shall violate any provision of this Ordinance shall' be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished as deflned by. State law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of ~doYer on this 16th day of Februarv. 1999. ..... ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER .. l- i i .!I. :]. ~" /Il~t~~ _I.I,'.'.f~. - . .- .~l~B-':'-~[cKe!vey. Mayor 1 - -- Vi'e1:Dn""O'Bc~"ehy'etcrk l CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: May 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Community Development ITEM NO. David L. Carlberg Discuss Exhibit A Community Development Director Development Phasing D ?evelopment Policy Guideline Staff will present this item at the meeting. / / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: May 2.2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Item Planning ITEM NO. John Hinzman, Discuss sale of City Property City Planner Fire Station No. 1 q, North of 139th Ave Louis Rosburg Request The City Council is asked to discuss the sale of city property to Louis Rosburg at 2407 139th Avenue NW (see attached map). The land is located north of 139th Avenue NW and is presently part of Fire Station No. 1 located south of 139th Ave. The property would be incorporated into two adjacent parcels owned by Mr. Rosburg. As a result of / the sale, 139th Avenue would become the property line between the Fire Station and Rosburg properties. History During the construction of the new Crosstown Blvd in 1988, 139th Avenue was realigned to match Crosstown Drive. Moving the road south left a small portion of the Fire Station property north of the new road. The City has sold renmant parcels to adjoining property owners in the past. In 1998 a substandard lot along Round Lake Blvd was sold and combined with adjacent property owned by lone Lienke. Sale Price John Leone of the Anoka County Assessors office has been contacted regarding a price for the property. Information will be provided at the meeting. Procedure Upon Council direction, a public hearing would be held to authorize the land sale. , ~ Qty of Fire Station 1 - Property Sale Andover co co co LO ~ ('f) LO LO N N N 14023 't'""" ~ I"- m fB ('f) ~ t5 14013 LO N N N NZ ~ 0 0 fB 0 LO ~ N LO N N / 't'""" FIRE ~ 't'""" ~ ~ ~ N N N 2487 LEGEND N Sources: A Andover Planning Andover GIS Anoka County GIS Site Location ~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION , ) DATE: Mav 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Staff, Committees, Commissions Todd Haas, #' Engineering ITEM NO. Order Date/Public Hearing/Snowmobiles/Ordinance 107 ID. The City Council is requested to schedule a public hearing regarding Ordinance 107 (snowmobiles). Possible dates to consider in June are as follows: Monday, June 19, 2000 @ 7:00 PM Monday, June 26, 2000 @ 7:00 PM Wednesday, June 28, 2000 @ 7:00 PM , Staff is recommending that the hearing be held later in June so that an article can be placed in , ) AndoverToday, which should be plenty of notice for the residents to make arrangements. '\ , ) Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - April 18, 2000 Page 12 (Sketch Plan Review/Woodland Woods/Woodlal.d Development, Continued) Councilmember Jacobson was concerned with on~ very long cul-de-sac, again suggesting a provision be made for going east to at 156th to a future r:evelopment. With a straight narrow roadway, it becomes a race track. Is there some way to bac~: it up? His main concern is where the roads will go outside of this plat. Mr. Westlund stated that was discussed with S 'iff. Mr. Carlberg felt it would be appropriate for Staff and the developer to meet with the prol ~rty owners from both sides to look at potential development of the entire area. Councilmeml..:r Jacobson asked if the developer had considered looking at putting townhomes in here, a mixed used with a higher density. Mr. Westlund stated they did propose a PUD with mixed housing and met with Mr. Carlberg; but because it is so narrow and how the road can go, this seems to be the best fit for the property. They are willing to look at some low cost housing. Mayor McKelvey was concerned with one long cul- de-sac and suggested working with Staff to see if it can be corrected. There were no further Council comments. DISCUSS ORDINANCE NO. lO91SNOWMOWLES John Campbell. 4017 145th Avenue - stated he has no interest in pursuing snowmobiling in Andover. They find it incompatible with the proposed development going on in the City, the parks and the trails. He felt they are beating their heads against the wall and suggested the issue of whether or not snowmobiling should be allowed in Andover be put on a referendum for the residents to vote on. The Sno-Dragons have no interest in pursuing trails or in snow patrol. Councilmember Jacobson noted the current ordinance was to be in place for only one year. He suggested a hearing be held to determine whether the current ordinance in place should be rescinded and snowmobiling be allowed everywhere in the City, whether the ordinance in place now should be retained which splits the City as to where snowmobiling is and is not allowed, or to expand no snowmobiling throughout the entire City. Council member Johnson knew there were still concerns with sno\\IDobiling north of 161st where people are to be riding in the streets. They are still riding in the boulevards and through people's yards. She wondered if they should look at the possibility of banning snowmobiling on all City streets and giving the trail association time to come up with trails and park-and-ride locations. The Council agreed to hold a hearing as suggested by Councilmember Jacobson to be held at a special meeting in June, the Staff to choose a date. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: May 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Staff, Committee, Commission Community Development ITEM NO. Schedule Meeting David L. Carlberg \ \. Economic Development Authority Community Development Director The City Council is requested to schedule a meeting of the Economic Development Authority for Tuesday, May 9, 2000 at 6:00 p.m. Attached is a preliminary agenda for the meeting. / , DRAFT Economic Development Authority Meeting - Tuesday, May 9, 2000 Call to Order - 7:00 PM Approval of Minutes 1. WDE Park Complex Development/Leonard Parker & Associates 2. Bunker Lake Blvd Redeve10pment/Leonard Parker & Associates 3. Advance Resources Contract Changes 4. Advance Resources Presentation of Concepts/Andover Station 5. TIF Discussion 6. Discuss Sale of Lot 2, Block 1, Andover Commercial Park 7. Approve Elevations of BuildingN eterinary Hospital 8. Other Business 9. Adjournment ~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FORCOUNCILACTION \ ) DATE: M~ 2, ,nnn AGENDA SECTION ORlGINA TING DEPARTMENT Staff, Committees, Commissions Administration Richard Fursnan ITS\II NO. IJ. Schedule Strategc Planning Workshop! ~me REQUEST: The council is requested to consider scheduling a strategic planning session to provide direction for the next 12-18 months. The session would be with department heads and the Council. Staff has been in contact with facilitator groups and could make arrangements once a date or dates are selected. An all day session is preferred, however, perhaps two 3.5 hour Tuesday evening sessions would also work. \ It is hoped by staff that the session could be completed before the budget formation is too far along. , / Goals and objectives for the council could be and should be an essential part of the budget. , / CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '\ I DATE: May 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion Planning and Zoning ITEM NO. Special Use Permit Jeff Johnson Relocate Primary Structure Zoning Administrator 177XX Ward Lake Drive NW Doug and JoAnn Lawrence \0. The City Council is asked to review and approve the Special Use Permit for Doug and JoAnn Lawrence to relocate a single family home onto approximately twenty (20) acres they own located at 1 77 XX Ward Lake Drive NW (R-l, Single Family Rural Zoning). Please see attached map for location. Plannin:: and Zonin!! Commission Recommendation , / The Planning and Zoning Commission met on April 11, 2000 and recommends to the City Council approval (unanimous) of said Special Use Permit request with the conditions as stated in the attached resolution. The applicant owns two (2) parcels ofland to the south of the proposed home site or parcel and will work with City Staff to move a lot line so that the required lot frontage as per City ordinance can be obtained for the new home site. A Staff report is attached for your review. '\ , J CITY OF ANDOVER ) COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOUL TION NO. - A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE RELOCATION OF A SINGLE F AMIL Y HOME ONTO 177XX WARD LAKE DRIVE NW (LEGALLY DESDCRIBED AS THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MN [PIN 02-32-24-13-0001)) BY DOUG AND JOANN LAWRENCE. WHEREAS, Doug and JoAnn Lawrence have petitioned for a special use permit to relocate a single family home from 2501 NW Main Street in Coon Rapids onto the property described above located at 177XX Ward Lake Drive NW. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinances No. 200 and No.8, Section 5.03; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a / detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of Andover; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held pursuant to State Statute; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit as requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the Special Use Permit on said property with the following conditions: 1) That the Special Use Permit be subject to a sunset clause as stipulated in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(d). 2) That the relocated structure complies with all applicable ordinances, building codes and fire codes. 3) That the relocated structure be placed on a permanent foundation within thirty (30) days of the issuance of a building permit. / Page Two Resolution Lawrence 4) That a minimum four hundred and forty (440) square foot attached garage be constructed within one hundred and eighty (180) days from the date the Special Use Permit is approved. 5) That a primary and secondary septic area be identified and duly protected as per Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this _ day of ,2000. ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER \ Victoria V olk, City Clerk J.E. McKelvey, Mayor .- ; ~ " ~ ::}" : /~>~ ~' .- .~.- "".....:.. t" i i i Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April 11, 2000 Page 15 / 10. control plan must be devised and mmmg 11. rf must be established via wood fiber 12. 13. 14. 15. excavation and 16. on a 7-ayes, O-nays, O-absent vote. inzman stated this would be considered by the City Council on May 2, 2000. PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL USE PERMIT (SUP 00-03) - RELOCATION OF PRIMARY STRUCTURE - i77XX WARD LAKE DRIVE NW - DOUGLAS AND JOANN LAWRENCE. Zoning Administrator Jeff Johnson stated the Plarming and Zoning Commission is requested to consider the SUP request of Doug and JoAnn Lawrence to relocate a single-family home onto approximately 20 acres located at 177XX Ward Lake Drive NW. He provided an overview of tlle request and explained that Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the special use permit process and outlines the following criteria for review: 1) the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding land; 2) the effect on existing arld anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and larld; 3) the effect on the values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area; and 4) the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plarl. Mr. Johnson noted Ordinance No. 200 regulates the movement of structures over public roads and the placement of such structures on land within the City via the special use permit process. He noted the home is compatible with the surrounding structures, which would protect neighboring properties from depreciation. Mr. Johnson indicated soil borings have confirmed that the site is buildable for the walkout rambler. He explained the proposed site is surrounded by the R-1, Single Family Rural Zoning District. The nearest home is approximately 150 feet from the proposed site. Mr. Jolmson explained the proposed home is a 1,633 square foot walkout rambler constructed in 1960. The home will be placed on the vacant lot to meet all applicable building setback requirements. He noted the applicant would be required to construct a minimum four hundred and forty (440) square foot attached garage in accordance with Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 - Minimum Requirements. The entire home eventually will be re-sided to match the new siding on the garage. He stated the home is structurally sound and there are no major building code issues. The applicant will be working with the Building Official through the moving arld permitting process. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April]], 2000 , Page ]6 Motion by Hedin, seconded by Kirchoff to open the public hearing at 10:07 p.m. Motion carried on a 7-ayes, O-nays, O-absent vote. There was no other public input. Motion by Hedin, seconded by Falk, to close the public hearing at 10:07 p.m. Motion carried on a 7- ayes, O-nays, O-absent vote. Commissioner Daninger asked ifthere was a timeframe for the residing of the home and garage. Mr. Johnson stated this could be added to the resolution if needed. Doug Lawrence, 177XX Ward Lake Drive NW, stated this would be completed within the first 60 days upon arriving on the site. Chair Squires stated a date of November 1,2000 could be set for completion ofthe garage and siding of the home. He asked when the home would be moved. Mr. Lawrence stated the home would be moved after Council approval, or sometime in late May. I Motion by Daninger, seconded by Kirchoff, to recommend to the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit request of Doug and JoAnn Lawrence to relocate a single family home onto approximately 20 acres located at 177XX Ward Lake Drive NW, finding that the request meets the criteria established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 with the following conditions: 1. That the Special Use Pennit be subject to a sunset clause as stipulated in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(d). 2. That the relocated structure complies with all applicable ordinances, building codes and fire codes. ~ That the relocated structure be placed on a pennanent foundation within thirty (30) :l. days of the issuance of a building permit. 4. That a minimum four hundred and forty (440) square foot attached garage be constructed within one hundred eighty (180) days from the date the Special Use Permit is approved and that the structure be sided to match the primary structure within one hundred eighty (180) days. 5. 1 hat a pnmary and secondary septic area be Identltled and duly protected as per Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07. 6. That the applicant combines the two southern most parcels they own with the proposed 20-acre site to meet the minimum required frontage of 300 feet. Motion carried on a 7-ayes, O-nays, O-absent vote. Mr. Jo1mson stated this would be considered by the City Council on May 2, 2000. ~ . ,~ e~ . - . , . , CITY OF 'ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE April 11, 2000 AGENDA ITEM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR I 9. Public Hearinl!: AGENDA Relocation of Primary Structure Planning 177XX Ward Lake Drive NW Jeff Johnson DowJ and JoAnn Lawrence BY: BY: REOUEST The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the request of Doug and JoAnn Lawrence to relocate a single family home onto approximately 20 acres located at 177XX Ward Lake Drive NW, legally described in the attached resolution. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Rural. " APPLICABLE ORDINANCES I Ordinance No.8. Section 5.03 - Special Uses. Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the special use permit process and outlines the following criteria for review: 1) The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding land. 2) The effect on existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land. 3) The effect on the values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area. 4) The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. Ordinance No. 200 - Relocation of Structures. Ordinance No. 200 regulates the movement of structures over public roads and the placement of such structures on land within the City via the special use permit process. The following criteria shall be considered: , ) 1) Compatibility witl1 surrounding uses and structures. . .' " . Page Two / Special Use Permit - 177XX Ward Lake Drive NW / Lawrence 2) Protection against the depreciation of neighboring properties. Adiacent Land Use The proposed site is surrounded by the R-1, Single Family Rural Zoning District. The nearest home is approximately 150 feet from the proposed site. Proposed Home and Home Site The proposed home is a 1,633 square foot walkout rambler constructed in 1960. The home will be placed on the vacant lot to meet all applicable building setback requirements. The applicant will be required to construct a minimum four hundred and forty (440) square foot attached garage in accordance with Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 _ Minimum Requirements. The entire home eventually will be re-sided to match the new siding on the garage. I Buildinl! Department Review The home is structurally sound and there are no major building code issues. The applicant will be working with the Building Official through the moving and permitting process. General Review - The age and value of the proposed home is consistent with surrounding homes. - Soil borings have been done and has confirmed that the site is buildable for a lookout rambler type home. - The applicant or contractor will need to obtain a moving permit from the building department. Commission Options The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend one (l) ofthe following options to the City Council: 1) Approval. Finding that the request meets the criteria established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03. \ , ) , " Page Three ) Special Use Permit - 177XX Ward Lake Drive NW Lawrence 2. Denial. Finding that the request does not meet the criteria established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03. 3) Table. Pending further information from staff or the applicant. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposal subject to the provisions stated in the attached ordinance. Attachments Resolution Location Map Site Map Applications / Notice of Public Hearing , J , .' . ' SCAr OO,-ps , ' ' ~ , . , '. . , :' .' .. . . , CITY of ANDOVER , ) 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100 '. '.' .; . . .. ",,' > f . , . ;SPECIAL USE PERMIT. H' ';':/,., .~ "\; "", - ...... . Property Address .,..... i:.1 O:7~ OX. X.;~ ,':htdtL+1~,;.:1i.9 (hI?," ,lJ'L.N'Y,f{:..~,;;;,-;:;,:.;",.,;;"".;:.",:iC",";;!i<~;::;~~";""'~"iin',k:. .>:~..':,,~;^: :.c.:"..'j;.;:{YV:j'?;:l,~:;o.:;~,~:..,<..~~.~t;<;~;;:;.f,c:;;+,:;)"j:.'.;"};'r::~:i:;';':j.\?it;~.:::~!".~~:("~:~r;78:,:::,y?;},":J;:~ii~~;,?~,~i;:(~~;'~:~j~~i;~t~;%'~~\;:~;:~' . LegaI Description of Property: (Fill in whicheveds appropriate) ." ..,"',"-._ '_; . 'j;";>~B;O'~;/;;'/~;;;"CAdffi~.g';;'/;Ci"'Si';'f~~f~~2~~~;~~1; . .. " .' (Ifmetes'arid bounds, attach the complete legal description):." ",',' ...',.:., :,;,:.,~7':\:r;';",:' . . .'" ,: 0:',;, .,.,'..,'."!:.: ....: {{/:,;,,: >}:. .; .';;/; \..::.:::/('>,.;:.:F::~:,,\";:,.'\.~/t-.. .... .:;;tP~t;f~f'l.E~?~':;i~,f'!:~e~'/i.\-'~;f.,;_. .'~. Is the property Abstract or Torrei1s:(ToverifythiScallllieAii:c;kaC~tuity'Officeat 323~5400.with':'::"/'<'. ,," '.. . the property PIN number) . . . . . - '.. . ". '.: . . . . . ,~' Abstract Torrens Description of Request . J Section of Ordinance Current Zoning r r r r Name of Applicant bOu.ql/4C) ~ ,~J{) 11 ,Ai Id I f I ( ~. /1 Address t L: ~. \i , Lc i lY\ {U/l\ c~..... I (' ~.) '. ~J Home Phone ? 55- "'414-t) Business Phone/55 -1q;J{J Fax :;; ,- l-.' S' ( -. . k 'J./ . ^ -1 d.-7-0C ( .. j)J(J;,.) Lt!-e Date Ignature \ ..) -" I .J , J 1 , '.', ; SPECIAL USE PERMIT PAGE 2 Property Owner (Fee Owner) (If different from above) Address Home Phone Business Phone Fax Signature Date The following information shall be submitted prior to review by the City of Andover: 1. Signed application and scaled drawing showing the following: a. Scale b. North arrow c. Dimensions of the property and structures d. Front, side, and rear yard building setbacks ) e. Adjacent streets f. Location and use of existing structures within 100 feet Application Fee: Commercial $250.00 includes mailing labels Residential ($2'oo:oo::,includes mailing labels Amended SUP $150.00 includes mailing labels Public Notification Sign $25.00 Recording Fee: ~ Abstract property T orren~property $40.00 .1) Date pai~ Jill I Oi Receipt # 0/~30 I revised 10/29/99 g:/data/staffi'mbarnett/sup.doc 3/14/00 , ) 2 @ City of 177XX Ward Lake Dr j Andover Special Use Permit - Relocate Home ,..... ,-, ,..... 1804. 18041 18041 1804. 18041 18051 Il1036 16016 16017 16016 1l1OOO 16001 16001 16000 16001 17946 ~ 17946 17947 >< 17920 '7921 1131 17910 916 '7917 17916 ~ 1130 17646 17845 \ moo 1 I I 1 I ,ma I - - ~ - - - , j 1364 moo 1290 \ 17564 17554 17500 17350 17295 LEGEND N Sources: "- o 350' Mailing Boundary A Andover Planning Andover GIS ) o Properties Notified Site Location Anoka County GIS NSubjec1 p~rty 1 inch = 990 feet R.F - 1:11.883 Map Date: March 27, 2000 ,o' J , OF ANDOVER S 1 / 2 S E C ".. , ~. , ". , . )oIL- f)OrtjtJ~5 OIL f1&O l--UJl4JV7 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO RELOCATE STRUCTURE / , ApplicantName D()Ll~)(.L'7 ~\.T()~AJAJ Phone No. '7~5 -4'13 0 I L -a u..He..G nc..e. Current Address Z.477 N. uj. M..t1,'1\J S4.. c.oOI"'\ ~l&.s Existing Location of Structure to be Moved 2. 501 1J I u..J, tv\~ 8+/ ('~&n Rapl~ Legal Description and Address of Property where Structure/Building is Proposed to be Looatoo / S 1/2. o~ SlIJ 1/4 "i NG Y4- J7700 lAJaJld liJu.. D;t. <Gee. 2, 5-;}.-,?,4 :20 ~ Type of Structure IRa I'Y\ h l (" ,v---' Size of Structure -.-J to '3?J ~. \=t-. Proposed Use of Structure ~CJ~~; (jdt'I(jL * * * * * * * * * * CD . ~. B' . Name of Moving Contractor ~t'Y\p\ e.. ~W\d l'~ ~ ~+u..bb6 LL.J.t9.~ tv\~ 1045 Se,::>s~e.. "::>"\-. \ 85 Old Ce~s~~ l~j Rc\ , Address s.+. ~MM 65IDI \...oh3l-...ak'p"M 0.:>035(0 ~51-1 4-742.1 IolZ. - 4-7'1- 3\B4- Phone Number :tf;::- /4.3 tP ffb State License No. Date and Time Structure to be Moved Proposed Route (Structure to be Moved) dool\J ~\Ir!J +0 ~wnk kk, fbLv-J)- ~ <NrYM&n +n Wt1\ & ~te..I)Jf * * * * * * * * * * Permit Fee Date Paid Receipt No. All applications shall be made pursuant to the regulations set forth in the following Ordinances/Applicable Laws: Ordinance No. 200 - Regulating the Moving of Structures The City of Andover Zoning Ordinance ) Minnesota State Building Code ..' a . , / " , j ..' . , CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTy OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA The Planriingand Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tmisday,Aprilll, 2000 at Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Anclover,Minnesotato review the special uSe 'permit request of Douglas and JoAnnLawrence to move a primary structure (existing home) onto a 20 acre parcel located at 177xx Ward Lake Drive (PIN 02-32-24-13-0001) . legally described as follows: The South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarterof Section 2, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. . . ) . ." :rOo , Ii'''''''''' ~u.~........ ..,.~ i-~.. , . . PIN 23224310003.0 PIN 23224140006.0 PIN 23224130003.0 AUDETTE JOHN G & JOANNE MAGNUSON VERA M NORDSTROM JOHN A & TAMlKA R OR CURRENT RESIDENT 8750 W ROCKFORD DR OR CURRENT RESIDENT l~r.t)OWARDLAKEDR PEORIA, AZ 85382 1110 179TH AVE )OVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 I PIN 23224130002.0 PIN 23224240008.0 PIN 23224130007,0 AKRIVOS NIKOLAOS & N J LARSEN MERWYN R & DOROTHY G MAGNUSON MANLEY S & VERA M OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 12124 BLUEBIRD CIRNW 1130 179THAVE 17844 XEON ST COON RAPIDS, MN 55448 ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 23224240009.0 PIN 23224140005.0 PIN 23224130001.0 HAGBERG PHILIP R & MICHELE BENOLKIN KARl K C & STEVEN J MAGNUSON VERA M OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 17817 YELLOW PINE ST 17800 PALM ST ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 23224240010.0 PIN 23224140004.0 PIN 23224240011.0 SOMMERFELD GEORGE R & S M WESTMAN BRUCE G & VIRGINIA M HEL TEMES GARRETT M & J E OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT OR CURRENT RESIDENT 17745 YELLOW PINE ST 17758 PALM ST 17715 YELLOW PINE ST ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 ANDOVER, MN 55304 PIN 23224410001.0 FANUCCI LAURO M & RlTA 560 177TH AVE NW ANDOVER, MN 55304 " ) ) \ CITY OF ANDOVER / REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: May 2.2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non - Discussion Item Planning ITEM NO. fl. John Hinzman, Variance Ord. 10 City Planner Minimum Buildability 28xx 168th Lane Stan Roshau. Request The City Council is asked to approve the request of Stan Roshau on property located at 28xx 168'h Lane NW to vary from the following provisions of Ordinance 10, Section 9.06.A3, Minimum Lot Size and Buildability Requirements: 1) Vary approximately 7,842.58 s.f. (34.9%) from the minimum requirement of \ / 22,500 s.f. of contiguous buildable land for a home site. 2) Vary from the 150' x 150' dimension requirement for a building pad, as depicted on the attached plans Total lot size is approximately 2.5 acres and is zoned R-1, Single Family Rural. Planning and Zoning Commission Review The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval. Two options were given to the Commission. Option One as depicted in the Planning and Zoning Staff Report had a smaller variance but required the secondary septic system area to be placed a distance from the home and would also require piping under a ditch to the main system. Under Option Two, both septic systems would be contiguous but require a larger variance would be needed.. The Commission determined Option One placed a practical difficulty on the property owner and recommended Option Two as depicted on the attached resolution. Attachments . Resolution for approval \ . Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes ~ April 11, 2000 J . Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report ~ April 11, 2000 ) CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -00 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REQUEST OF STAN ROSHAU TO VARY FROM ORDINANCE 10, SECTION 10, SEeTON 9.06A3 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 28XX 168TH LANE NW (PIN 09-32-24-31-0011) WHEREAS, Stan Roshau is the owner of property located at 28xx 168th Lane NW, legally described as follows: The East 366.67 feet ofthe West 2250.2 feet of the South 297 feet of the North 660 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, Stan Roshau has requested the following variances to Ordinance 10, Section 9.06A3: 1) Vary approximately 7,842.58 s.f. (34.9%) from the minimum requirement of , J 22,500 s.f. of contiguous buildable land for a home site. 2) Vary from the 150' x 150' dimension requirement for a building pad, as depicted on the attached plans WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed said requests and has determined that the existence of the lot before stringent wetland regulations, and small percentage of variance as practical difficulties not created by the property owner meeting the variance provisions of Ordinance No.1 0, Section 17. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the approval would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of Andover; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of said variance request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the variance. / City Council Resolution Page Two Variance - 28xx 168" Lane NW May 2, 2000 / Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 2nd day of May, 2000. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: lE. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria V olk, City Clerk / / Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April J J, 2000 Page 17 ; VARIANCE: V AR 00-07 - ORDINANCE 8, SECTION 6.02 - LOT COVERAGE AND SETBACKS - 3149 162ND LANE NW - JAMES LARSON. This item was tabled to the April 25, 2000 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting upon adoption of the agenda. VARIANCE: V AR 00-08 - ORDINANCE 10, SECTION 9.96A - MINIMUM BUILD ABILITY - 28XX 168TH LANE - STAN ROSHAU. City Planner John Hinzman stated the Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to review the request of Stan Roshau on property located at 28xx 168th Lane NW to vary from provisions of Ordinance 10 related to buildability standards. He provided an overview of the request and explained that the Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the request to vary from the following provisions of Ordinance 10, Section 9.06.A3, Minimum Lot Size and Buildability Requirements to vary approximately 2,842.58 s.f. (12.6%) from the minimum requirement of22,500 s.f. of contiguous buildable land for a home site and vary 24.6 feet (16.4%) from the 150' x 150' dimension requirement for a building pad. Mr. Hinzman explained the total lot size is approximately 2.5 acres and is zoned R-1, Single Family Rural. / Mr. Hinzman noted Ordinance 10, Section 9.06.A3, the Minimum Buildability Requirements for Non-MUSA Lots which are not served by municipal sanitary sewer and outside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA), no residential lot shall be developed for residential purposes unless it contains 22,500 s.f. of contiguous land area that is buildable with a minimum width of 150' and minimum depth of 150'. Mr. Hinzman stated Ordinance 10, Section 17, Variances, allows variances to be granted where it is shown that by reason of topography or other physical conditions strict compliance with the requirements could cause an exceptional and undue hardship to the owner. Variances may be granted only if the variance does not adversely affect the adjacent property owners and intent of the ordinance. Mr. Hinzman noted the applicant states the hardship is that this lot requires 16,500 s.f. of wetland fill to meet the 150' x 150' buildable land requirement. Mr. Hinzman noted the property was created during the 1970's, before current wetland regulations. He stated the applicant would bring in the maximum amount of fill allowed by the Anoka Conservation District (4,000 s.f.). Staff has determined that the existence of the lot before the adoption of wetland regulations presents a practical difficulty not created by the property owner and that similar variances have been granted in the past, including a 2,850 s.f. Variance to the 22,500 s.f. building pad requirement on a five parcel in 1999. Mr. Hinzman explained staff created two scenarios for the primary and secondary sewer site variance / from the original request. He reviewed the two site plans for the site. Mr. Hinzman noted the first Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April 11, 2000 Page 18 J site plan shows the primary and secondary sewer sites on opposite sides of the creek. He explained the second site plan has the primary and secondary sewer sites on the same side of the creek near the building pad. Mr. Hinzman noted recommends approval of either site plan due to the stringent wetland restrictions. Commissioner Hedin asked if a pipe could run through the creek to the secondary site of the first site plan. Mr. Hinzman stated this could be completed with insulated pipes but would have to be addressed in further detail by the City Engineer. Commissioner Hedin questioned if there would be enough buildable land left after the septic sites were placed on the lot. Mr. Hinzman stated there would be approximately 14,000 square feet of buildable space and that the City of Andover requires 22,500 square feet. Motion by Hedin, seconded by Apel, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Stan Roshau to vary from provisions of Ordinance 10, Section 10, Section 9.06A3 on property located at 28xx 168th Lane NW for the second plan provided by Staff with the primary and secondary sewer sites located on the southwest portion of the lot. Motion carried on a 7-ayes, O-nays, O-absent vote. , / Mr. Johnson stated this would be considered by the City Council on May 2, 2000. VARIANCE: V AR 00-09 - ORDINANCE 8, SECTION 6.02 - LOT DEPTH - 13913 OLIVE STREET NW - WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT. Mr. Johnson stated the Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to review the variance request of Woodland Development Corporation to allow for the construction of a single family home to encroach into the front yard setback on the property located at 13913 Olive Street NW, legally described as Lot 4, Block 2, Cherrywood Estates. He provided an overview of the request and explained that the property is zoned R-4, Single Family Urban. Mr. Johnson indicated Ordinance No 8; Section 6.02 establishes the minimum lot requirements. This Section requires a thirty-five (35) foot building setback from the front lot line. He noted that Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04 establishes the variance process. Mr. Johnson stated variances may be granted where there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships not allowing one to carry out the strict letter of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. The hardships or difficulties must have to do with the characteristics of the land and not the property owner. Mr. Johnson noted the applicant is requesting the variance to construct a single-family home, which would encroach five (5) feet into the thirty-five (35) foot building setback from the front lot line. The variance is being requested because of the difficulty to place a home on the lot. He explained , the lot meets all the minimum lot size requirements as stated in Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 but is / ! CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE: April 11, 2000 ITEM NO. 11 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT V AR 00-08 Planning Variance to Ordinance 10 Minimum Buildability Requirements John Hinzman 28xx 168th Lane NW City Planner Stan Roshau Request The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the request of Stan Roshau on property located at 28xx 168th Lane NW to vary from the following provisions of Ordinance 10, Section 9.06.A3, Minimum Lot Size and Buildability Requirements: 1) Vary approximately 2,842.58 s.f. (12.6%) from the minimum requirement of 22,500 s.f. of contiguous buildable land for a home site. 2) Vary 24.6 feet (16.4%) from the 150' x 150' dimension requirement for a building pad. Total lot size is approximately 2.5 acres and is zoned R-1, Single Family Rural. Applicable Ordinances Ordinance 10, Section 9.06.A3, Minimum Buildablity Requirements for Non-MUSA Lots which In areas which are not served by municipal sanitary sewer and outside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA), no residential lot shall be developed for residential purposes unless it contains... 22,500 s.f. of contiguous land area that is buildable with a minimum width of 150' and minimum depth of 150'. Variance 00-08 April 11, 2000 P & Z Report 2857 168th Lane NW - Roshau Page 2 of3 I Ordinance 10, Section 17, Variances, allows variances to be granted where it is shown that by reason of topography or other physical conditions strict compliance with the requirements could cause an exceptional and undue hardship to the owner. 'Variances may be granted only if the variance does not adversely affect the adjacent property owners and intent of the ordinance. In general economic considerations have not been considered as hardship criteria. Hardship The applicant states the following as a hardship: Lot requires 16,500 sf of wetland fill to meet the 150' x 150' buildable land area requirement. Anoka County Conservation District will allow only 4,000 sf offill that is exempt from replacement. Anything above 4,000 sf would need to be replaced at a 2: 1 ratio. Staff Review . The property was created during the 1970's, before current wetland regulations. . A drainage ditch and wetland diagonally bisects the property. . The applicant will bring in the maximum amount of fill allowed by the Anoka Conservation District (4,000 s.f.). . The Building Official has reviewed the proposed plan. . Staff has determined that the existence of the lot before the adoption of wetland regulations presents a practical difficulty not created by the property owner. . Similar variances have been granted in the past, including a 2,850 s.f. Variance to the 22,500 s.f. building pad requirement on a five parcel in 1999. Plannin~ Commission Options The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend one ofthe following options: 1) Recommend approval ofthe proposed Variance. 2) Recommend denial of the Variance, citing those reasons for doing'so. 3) Table the item pending additional information from staff or the applicant. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval. Please see the attached resolution Variance 00-08 April II, 2000 P & Z Report 2857 168'" Lane NW - Roshau Page 3 00 J Attachments . Resolution for approval . Area Location Map . Site Survey . Site Pictures . Copy of Variance Application CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -00 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REQUEST OF STAN ROSHAU TO VARY FROM ORDINANCE 10, SECTION 10, SEeTON 9.06A3 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 28XX 168TIl LANE NW (PIN 09-32-24-31-0011) WHEREAS, Stan Roshau is the owner of property located at 28xx 168th Lane NW, legally described as follows: The East 366.67 feet of the West 2250.2 feet of the South 297 feet of the North 660 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, Stan Roshau has requested the following variances to Ordinance 10, Section 9.06A3: , / 1) Vary approximately 2,842.58 s.f. (12.6%) from the minimum requirement of 22,500 s.f. of contiguous buildable land for a home site. 2) Vary 24.6 feet (16.4%) from the 150' x 150' dimension requirement for a building pad. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed said requests and has determined that the existence of the lot before stringent wetland regulations, and small percentage of variance as practical difficulties not created by the property owner meeting the variance provisions of Ordinance No. 10, Section 17. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the approval would not have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of Andover; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of said variance request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation ofthe Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the variance. / City Council Resolution Page Two Variance - 28xx 168th Lane NW May 2, 2000 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 2nd day of May, 2000. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: IE. McKelvey, Mayor Victoria V olk, City Clerk / @ City of Variance Andover 28xx 168th Lane NW . ~\ \ \ \ ",:~"" \ 3151 3095 \ 11018 I~ 2963 \ 2899 2184 J) ,- \ 11052 1- ~ l70THlN X 110TH LN I 11041 \ 11022 11020 11025 3114 11028 11023 2938 2888 11025 11020 I-' ... Iii It Ul gj I- 16963 0 ~ 16981 I 3239 ~ 15 269 3105 16971 2941 16916 16915 16910 16951 3053 l:l ft ~ - [jj - 169 "'.. 169THlN ~ 1""1>-"'" ,-I 3236 3162 2844 16920 2118 . 3108 3048 2984 2886 26e 3231 16881 3109 3045 3009 2935 2851 2819 16818 I~ 16819 2685 g 168TH LN -15 168THlN ,,' ,. i 2182 I 3146 3110 3046 3008 2934 2820 2686 3238 ~ :< , Site Location l5 I-' 2851 2819 Z177 2131 2819 3235 3145 3109 3045 .0,.. _~",,-,~_,:,_._,.~_,_, .= .,~~_.,~i I- 0 161TH LN 167THLN > ~ CD 3046 3008 2934 2858 2820 2714 18129 26 16 3230 W 3146 3110 ~ :5 16688 166 16882 16881 3231 0 Z "N 'Z f:. ::J Ii; 0 3133 '" 16&>- Ii; 0::: ... 16652 8 16655 0 ., 16685 .... 16829 /!t 5 0 Cl ~tlr- ~~ 16824 2105 2f 1/ 10032 ... (! 18881 ~ I. i~ .::l r-.... 2989 ... j 16582 '" ~ X 2692 16615 3088 3024 ~ 16808 1S= ~~ ' h '\ /I I I I I \ '" ....- LEGEND ~. ~ N (~.~ ~ A Sources: J- Andover Planning ..~ - Andover GIS I Site LocationlT "'" -;; Anaka County GIS AI Subject Property n <; ~. i'- .. inU ~~ !:i:. 1 inch - 990 feet RF -1:11,883 :\ Map Date: April 06, 2000 :::> c:: W ({) 0- .<::_N ...J I-Of"'l J:: :; 0 - . _cnO~ci1>tv _._ oc::c:: 0 z I I -- ~ (!) r~ w 99 I ~ I <'~ 0:: I "'0:: %"- Z'" O::z .., 8[3 '0~ I ,,-u >> 0,,- I '" ;!:o ~ >>'" zcr:~ ~~~ Z g -.....=....-: (Jl ~ ~Y..l.l.. =>"- I 0"''' ___ I L..."":-= _J ---------------- ___m___mur-mOO'099 -:~- " I m '" :li u m '" . Vl I ~ "- 0 " Z~ -;:,. --< f"'lo ~ !"lr-. '" , , I '" i ;!: co "- :;:0 (() :: t-= ,; 0 ~f"'l "- I ~ ~ l';~ g . '" <Of"'l '" z ~r FE \....'-'" a Olo: 0 roO Zz 0 I '" ;!: "- i 0 '" z I '- :J j!; ~ 5 Vl , ~ .J :') I OJ \ CD . ~ ~ " \...,) ~~ I r--'" ~t -'" a a:: a:: ...... D::~W ~. )C .f. " -O::~ ~+-., ... ~ 000 zUU 1....t; A" e~~ I , \,.,b't. ~ ' , ..v , I ;!:>- -, ",-- ~~ . ....' affi5 z II ~~t2 . l..-:t: '..) I "- Vl I \...\) ~88 99 ~~ I 5"-~ ",0 ,,-0 0 \.~l j!;t; o:~ ~ \.~') 0--' I 0--'''- "-", ",,,, "'''' 0 - 6 t , - , . , r-. , ~ , , , . , ri - . , --L- , , ~ . , I -L . , OJ ...L- ~ to N MHK ~4 'I~lj 14:~b FR CITY OF Rr~[JO\!ER 612 755 8923 TO 7533056 P.02/0:1 'rJ AR- ()O& CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULeVARD NoW: . ANOOVER, MINNIlSOTA 55304 . 1612) 755-5100 VARlANCEREQUEST FORM Property Address_cll'X X . /6cf1{(./)),'~ W,. Legal Description of Property; (Fill iJiwhicheirer js appropriate) . Lot Block PIN; ,,f tJ 9 3d.- ;2Y31'tJtJI! (If metes and bounds. attach the complete legal descriptio.a) .. . Is the property Abstract or Torrens: (To verifyOJis ~all tn.e Anoka County Office at 323.5400 with the property PIN number) , . Abstract k Torrens ........U Description of Request '. ~. ~.,.. ~{ ~ /...R! I K (flJ I zj.~ .....~ , MJ~.' '.' tJ du"u~~ tLUf ~ 7f."~ /(l{jl')( I~" A hardship must be present in o~dedora'varianceto be granted. Ordinance g, Section 5,04 defines a hardship as follows:."Where there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in any way.of carrywg out .the strict letter of the \ provisions of this Ordinance, an appealmay be made and a varian~ granted. The .' hardships o. difficulties. must have to do'with the chnracteristics ofthe limd and Dot the property o'....ner. " ,;;;;;;;1:;!:tr%':~ ~~ tW-4. ~~4~ '~aJdftll2W ~7 y~ '. 1,l~JI;f Jit.:;g;:f t:: _/'~ ,'IJ . ~ ....~..~~.. Zh .'~ ~ " . . . .. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Mav 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion Planning and Zoning ITEM NO. Variance - Front Yard Setback Jeff Johnson 13913 Olive Street NW Zoning Administrator L~~dland Development Corporation The City Council is asked to review and approve the variance request of Woodland Development Corporation to allow for the construction of a single family home that will encroach five (5) feet into the thirty-five (35) foot front yard setback on the property located at 13913 Olive Street NW, legally described as Lot 4, Block 2, Cherrywood Estates. The property is zoned R-4, Single Family Urban. Due to the fact that this is a cul-de-sac lot, it was felt that the front yard should be varied as , opposed to the rear yard. Building uniformity would not be as obvious at the front setback line / in the cul-de-sac as it would be at the rear setback line. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission met on April 11, 2000 and recommends to the City Council (unanimously) approval of said variance request. Please review the attached Staff report and minutes from the meeting. , I I / Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April 11, 2000 Page 18 'te plan shows the primary and secondary sewer sites on opposite sides of the creek. He expla' the ond site plan has the primary and secondary sewer sites on the same side of the cree ar the building d. Mr. Hinzman noted recommends approval of either site plan due to e stringent wetland restri ns. Commissioner Hedin as if a pipe could run through the creek to the ondary site of the first site plan. Mr. Hinzman stated could be completed with insul pipes but would have to be addressed in further detail by the 1 Engineer. Motion by Hedin, seconded pel, to recommend to the City cil approval of the request of Stan Roshau to vary fr provisions of Ordinance 10, Section 10, tion 9.06A3 on property located at 28xx 16 Lane NW for the second plan provided by Staff 'th the primary and secondary sew Ites located on the southwest portion of the lot. carried on a 7-ayes, O-nays, O-absent vote. Mr. Johnson stated this would be considered by the City Council on May 2, 2000. V AlUANCE: V AR 00-09 - ORDINANCE 8, SECTION 6.02 - LOT DEPTH - 13913 OLIVE STREET l'i'W - WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT. Mr. Jolmson stated the Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to review the variance request of Woodland Development Corporation to allow for the construction of a single family home to encroach into the front yard setback on the property located at 13913 Olive Street NW, legally described as Lot 4, Block 2, Cherrywood Estates. He provided an overview of the request and explained that the property is zoned R-4, Single Family Urban. Mr. Johnson indicated Ordinance No 8; Section 6.02 establishes the minimum lot requirements. .This Section requires a thirty-five (35) foot building setback from the front lot line. He noted that Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04 establishes the variance process. Mr. Johnson stated variances may be granted where there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships not allowing one to carry out the strict letter of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. The hardships or difficulties must have to do with the characteristics of the land and not the property owner. Mr. Johnson noted the applicant is requesting the variance to construct a single-family home, which would encroach five (5) feet into the thirty-five (35) foot building setback from the front lot line. ^' The variance is being requested because of the difficulty to place a home on the lot. He explained the lot meets all the minimum lot size requirements as stated in Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 but is Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - Aprilll, 2000 Page 17 ARIANCE: V AR 00-07 - ORDINANCE S, SECTION 6.02 - LOT COVERAGE AN S< BACKS - 3149 162ND LANE NW - JAMES LARSON. This it was tabled to the April 25, 2000 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting upon of the age da. VARIANCE: .v AR OO-OS - ORDINANCE 10, SECTION 9.96A - MINIMUM B - 2SXX 168TH NE - STAN ROSHAU. an stated the Planning and Zoning Commission is equested to review the request of Stan Rosha on property located at 28xx 168th Lane NW t vary from provisions of Ordinance I 0 related to uildability standards. He provided an 0 rview of the request and explained that the Planning d Zoning Commission is asked to revi the request to vary from the following provisions of Ordl nce 10, Section 9.06.A3, Mini urn Lot Size and Buildability Requirements to vary approximat 2,842.58 s.f. (12.6%) from e minimum requirement of22,500 s.f. of contiguous buildable land fo a home site and vary 2 .0 feet (16.4%) from the 150' x 150' dimension requirement for a building d. Mr. Hinzman e ained the total lot size is approximately 2.5 acres and is zoned R-1, Single Farnil ural. \ Mr, Hinzman noted Ordinance 10, Section 06.A , the Minimum Buildability Requirements for Non-MUSA Lots which are not served by mu . Ipal sanitary sewer and outside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA), no residential 10 sfl 11 be developed for residential purposes unless it contains 22,500 s.f. of contiguous land are that is uildab1e with a minimum width of 150' and minimum depth of 150'. Mr. Hinzman stated Ordinance 10, S ction 17, Variances, a ows variances to be granted where it is shown that by reason of topog phy or other physical c ditions strict compliance with the requirements could cause an ex ptional and undue hardship to t owner. Variances may be granted only if the variance does t adversely affect the adjacent pro erty owners and intent of the ordinance. Mr. Hinzman n ed the applicant states the hardship is tha this lot requires 16,500 s.f. of wetland fill to meet the 0' x 150' buildable land requirement. Mr. Hinzman note the propeliy was created during the 1970' s, before CUIT t wetland regulations. plicant would bring in the maximum amount of fill all ed by the Anoka Conservation istrict (4,000 s.f.). Staff has determined that the existence of e lot before the adoption of etland regulations presents a practical difficulty not created by the pro erty owner and that simi variances have been granted in the past, including a 2,850 s.f. Variance to e 22,500 s.f. buildi pad requirement on a five parcel in 1999. . Hinzman explained staff created two scenarios for the primary and secondary sewer site nance , rom the original request. He reviewed the two site plans for the site. Mr. Hinzman noted the Irst Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April] ], 2000 Page ]9 unique because the buildable area between front lot line near the cul-de-sac and Prairie Road NW (once setbacks are taken into consideration) is only twenty (20) feet. Mr. Johnson stated that due to the fact this is a cul-de-sac lot, the Building Official felt that the front yard should be varied as opposed to the rear yard. He explained building uniformity would not be as obvious at the front setback line in the cul-de-sac as it would be at the rear setback line. Commissioner Hedin asked if the primary structure would be closer to Olive Street or Prairie Road. Mr. Jolmson stated the lot would be five feet closer to Olive Street, with uniformity to Prairie Road. Motion by Apel, seconded by Hedin, to recommend the City Council approval of the variance request of Woodland Development Corporation to Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 which requires a thirty-five foot front yard setback and to allow for the construction of a single family home that will encroach five feet into the thirty-five foot front yard setback on the propeliy located at 13913 Olive Street NW, legally described as Lot 4 Block 2, Cherrywood Estates. Motion carried on a 7-ayes, O-nays, O-absent vote. Mr. Jolmson stated this would be considered by the City Council on May 2, 2000. SCUSSION: TRANSITIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS. This ite was withdrawn from discussion upon adoption of the agenda. PPOINT COMMISSION MEMBER TO TH ELLULAR TOWER TASK Zoning Administrator Jef hnson advised the Commi on that City Council, at their meeting of April 4, 2000, authorized a ask Force Commit e be formed to review the City's current telecommunication tower ordinanc Ordinance N . 113). He noted the City recently adopted a one- year moratorium on the construction teleco munication towers. Mr. Johnson requested that the Planning Commission appoint two represe tives to serve on this Committee. Commissioner Kirchoff asked if thO committee . ould only address cellular towers. Mr. Jolmson stated this would address cellular owers and issues in Ived with their approval. Commissioner Dalien vol City Planne olm Hinzman briefed the Platming Commission on the outcorr of the issues that were pending Ith the City Council. He also gave a brief overview of items that wi e up for discussion at the ext Planning Commission meeting. " , Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April II, 2000 Page'2Q " ADJOU~ Motion by Daninger, se . Motion carried on a 7-ayes, O-nays, O-absent vote. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Guenther, Rec ding Secretary TimeSaver OJJS' Secretarial, Inc. \ t , CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE April 11, 2000 AGENDA ITEM ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROVED FOR 12. Variance - Front Yard Setback AGENDA 13913 Olive Street NW Planning Woodland Development Corp. BY: Jeff Johnson BY: REOUEST The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the variance request of Woodland Development Corporation to allow for the construction of a single family home to encroach into the front yard setback on the property located at 13913 Olive Street NW, legally described as Lot 4, Block 2, Cherrywood Estates. The property is zoned R-4, Single Family Urban. , / APPLICABLE ORDINANCES Ordinance No.8. Section 6.02 - Minimum Lot Requirements. Ordinance No 8, Section 6.02 establishes the minimum lQt requirements. This Section requires a thirty-five (35) foot building setback from the front lot line. Ordinance No.8. Section 5.04 - Variances. Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04 establishes the variance process. Variances may be granted where there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in any way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. The hardships or difficulties must have to do with the characteristics of the land and not the property owner. GENERALBACKGOUND The applicant is requesting the variance to construct a single family home which would encroach five (5) feet into the thirty-five (35) foot building setback from the front lot line. Other setbacks to note: ) Rearyard (Thoroughfare- Prairie Road) 35 feet Page Two ) Variance - 13913 Olive Street NW Woodland Development Corporation The variance is being requested because of the difficulty to place a home on the lot. The lot meets all the minimum lot size requirements as stated in Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 but is unique because the buildable area between front lot line near the cul-de-sac and Prairie Road NW (once setbacks are taken into consideration) is only twenty (20) feet. The applicant has also stated other reasons in the application relating to restrictive covenants, etc. Due to the fact that this is a cul-de-sac lot, the Building Official felt that front yard should be varied as opposed to the rear yard. Building uniformity would not be as obvious at the front setback line in the cul-de-sac as it would be at the rear setback line. COMMISSION OPTIONS 1. Approval. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval to the City Council of said request finding that the request meets the conditions established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04. ) 2. Denial. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend denial to the City Council of said request. The Commission finds that no hardship exists due to the unique shape or topography ofthe parcel and that the land owner would not be precluded reasonable use of the property. 3. Table. The Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item pending further information from staff or the applicant. A resolution is attached for your review. STAFF RECOMMEDATION Staff recommends approval of said ordinance. j , CITY OF ANDOVER j COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. - A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE VARIANCE REQUEST OF WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TO ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 6.02 WHICH REQUIRES A THIRTY-FIVE (35) FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK AND TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE F AMIL Y HOME THAT WILL ENCROACH FIVE (5) FEET INTO THE THRITY-FIVE (35) FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13913 OLIVE STREETNW, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 4, BLOCK 2, CHERRYWOOD ESTATES. WHEREAS, Woodland Development Corporation has requested a variance to Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 which requires a thirty-five (35) foot front yard setback and to allow for the placement and construction of a single family home that will encroach five (5) feet into the thirty-five (35) foot front yard setback on the property described above. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and J has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval ofthe variance requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and hereby approves the variance requested by Woodland Development Corporation on the property located at 13913 Olive Street NW, legally described as Lot 4, Block 2, Cherrywood Estates. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this _ day of ,2000. ATTEST:' CITY OF ANDOVER Victoria V olk, City Clerk J. E. McKelvey, Mayor , / ) ( Location Map ) ~'__' '_~ L i_;"';; ,_\. !i~ ;l1:1~1'~' . ;: ,;. ,~- I~ - . I 11e;~~'" I' ,. '/~ ,. -I I, 1i~ ~Q?,5 I. I ., VI :I // I , ~ '..1' . , . i:~..i~~~ : \ :. -/, I BARN'is ROLLING I- I;~O"'~~;;:' ". '\_1'-- I IOAKS 1!~'r.t<f.il-f'J.j '.1 I 'I' . 1"[' . /, ~:~ II" ,. I I I I I . I I 1~\lM" .'7, ,61'S . 1. ' i I _ ~c ~" _ ~~O, ::," .." 1/ r 1 I I 1 2'0 If l.,t.3 "I":"' ~ : OUTcOT A ~ I ti: !!.. 0 . ~ ~~ 0.. :: ~~ ~~ I I 2 ~ ~ ~:.~ ~~~l!!~H ' ;! :~~~?i~~~!ln~' I - :" AUDI ~ rltff 1lI tll3l1:; ~ ~Iilm~' ., :~ I \~ 7"';: ~6~~~ . !'I~O~ ~ I "'~ " '"" ".. '"' . . ' / "",;~.n' LI.I.,.... ~i---+ , '"""j!'J' ,.l..;."" .:~. 'i " ../ ~ '. IlL- 1 II> fl. yJ~~~I.I'~ f'~ R="" :'. ~#.~-f..)oo..;l,":~ f--- I)" V " . >V ',7:f-.-. --.!, .q'I"R~.-, f-! " . _ "1':;;~~ . i"'+;,..,. - - - -+ - - - - -1- - - e EI~i!~3i<lJ;'J ""~!'''j;~fOQ' !, '2 "...--~ ':'\.~. ~ I I ~/' '~ .,,~~~,;.:C~ : llil~ft, 6:~" ;i1C;;'';f.f,~~~~,-- 1 A ['..'/l 08~/N'/.;;} "'- ~~I'~ 1Q . ~ !....... ~ .J:;J1' NO "'~., ~" :1h;r;:;::.~ ; I "~" ~:~-S'.4 ,..."....,.;;;!;" "':'i' '7&9 n~.ADD.~ ~:\~I~ I R . ... 1.r,!;If' "fl.!. 6 I ' '1" 131~;'QI~H: ~C; {1'\.. . ~+ t. ............ ~~ ""i:t :!jil];l;; 1;1..8; ~,,;:r~., \tl1~" 'j'lC :1'l'(1 ,",",.II "'j"- ['1'\of ,. .f9,":I;J.!,h, ;'!"ii.5~ . 140_ ./ I"",~ ;:."....-"." ~ t~i-: I ,. wjlif~ ~ '"i~-7,17I I'i - - , '''''''''rN0~ i\,' I ."""CS" . 'I'O~ 1 I . ."",.. "Jl.:.1Yy. 8~ j'l!'~~. "',." 'H ~.~ HII..-:.v' . .. ".."' o;:'.;"rr;"i.,..,...".'..,.....~ . <to . "0 "/., 1.1. . I~. I' '. I I j..~'/~ . ~ .'. 1 "'" f ,t 7.i......,.:t..,~.~. .<<.r;kll~.' ;;o....F~..; ,~~ ~~...L.,h~..' ~.7t~,;..,.. '~~:::'5;A;o";R~~"'''" ~ I'!';!; r",~ ,.. ",," '. '<To . ~.. ~"'0~.,-/. ., " .1 .~:!:C' k-"~" 1/" 1\.,-~:J'-'i<~P; . i4)_f: ~~,. fn/;~ " y' ~ ~W. ,. .11 7 ,l ,.' "~"o' ,"J;-. ,'-"','.'''1'....' .lfI...U..N,.......' ,I",;?, :::' r'lfl-i' "'~:. ..~' :''''''I~';Y ~r" ~'CP'."')'t C\" I' "" .,." r " . '" . . "'V,A , ." ". .\",,,." .-'...0". ,i': .,',~ "';" ...'..... '" K"l:i' ..~~~.., ." , =5 ",,' ~~7!l.m";: ',,;..,.~. " . ..: '.: 'ilSl.!:I; _ '.7,~ '.\~01WC'8'ROQ ,. ',.. ~~o '~~, ! J' 8 WI(, I,' ~ It< . I . ,..)--'_7 1 ~ . . ~ .. i-" ,,,;;t;, f$./.1.'.J 1<i:. .' ::. 'f.! "1..7,i.;<'^Of ,~~ D.~,.i'i'\'id~12' \';":f;':;T;'(1,I0}." .., "!e-" " ':L..l\'~';"i.. I~~ .........10 . .G:lrjG:1" "..... 31.1' "O',":"r' , n-f. -;,~\..# ll:.1n,. II 1~2r :C:'::.,:: '-',:",",-:. ~~tllt.~~ [}.J.... 'II.," >>_;J n IQCU '::t Uu I' '1",;,. "" ~.~ ""'''~''''':''''~\;..~E!iili'.-$,;:;:,i.'''' .:" ./ "'Z/'i.~Mr~J::i-P!.M.:::: :..li<', !J :. ~m"!I[.\!;;\'~ ..1,2NO' ". ___' ~l~, ' ,...' rt~ -~, '< . ... "'I '-1_ I _ Il ,. .',.. u"::,:.,' '" ....-- ... ~'-::'-">"" _ ' "~""1"7 I~ I" ,. '11.01, ,.,. II 1\ 1C" .. "' ; fiTJ'ot/Z". , :, ':";'-~: L.:,.:.:.:' .::....... : ~~,i.:.J.I.i.i,,::.;. ';;:~. . . lili";-t\ ~'33ij ~,..,..........,.).T"i:"":,;,.,.\\ -I ,;~ BUNKER, li",<", i,,' ~~::; I , i;'i: ,.' '\' ;-... LAKE': :7,m" ;..... ... I I i': ,i.,ii...,,\~.,~"" ! iC,lV' ". . ',"" I ',; I:'':' ,........;.0" .", \~ii,,;i.. I :/.};~j ~".., ~ L ..'2\,..,",,',: '-I ".\ >, ,. " ,.'i" '\'../y ;':. ),X --- 1---":,: .....:.,... '-(. i.'i ,\ I 1"',,',),7; {t",?:\ ,'-::" D.1 :",ii i x' n'u I 'i./ '(1/5'>i..."'H' "i.': '. : 1......~0; ':lK.c.~'~ IF ! Ii', 'i"~ Ai," I(i.:",,!, \~i ,'~mmi< / MAR 29 '00 10:49 FR CITY OF ANDOVER 612 755 8923 TO WOODLAND DEV P.02/05 . .. .', ".': m.'.;:>'..'::::.:':..:::;,:.:,.." :,:;~.;<;.;.'.'.>;;./:,'~.. '.....:;...'.~O.. "".'-::'.~. . ....' . ,.... . .... . Vrrr,>: CiJ-()'l' ) .' .' ..... 'X.:}?h ::".Y;'ji:;:~~>'>\, '..'.. ..... ". .... ...... ....;; ..;..; ", - .CITY,of.ANr:'\o,,:rER . ........ ,...,. . .,. .. '...... . . ".. :. ", . ' . ~ . .r,V' :.::..,.,. ...~..' ~ ~', ..'~. . ,-. _:.... '." . " .... ," :'". '.' '.'~ . ." ' . .. v. " '.:,' . 1t>a5 bRoss.TOw.N'~B:qUtE\tABDN.W: ~ ~ND6v~R;:. tjll.t"N~SOT A' !i5304~'(e12l 755~5100,, ..., ....: Legal DesCription 'ofProPerty:' (fill ii\'whichev.ef:is.'appropnate) ',.. :' .... .';......,.::. :':. :." .:.: .":. ::,. . 4 .';:Bl~~::t,:' >:;Jj'~~~;0~r:rt~~?~:~,.:; '. --. /: '..: t ... <(lfmete:i~db(jtinds;,ittta~htlie,'cDmplCteli@ildescription) '.. ';'::': ...., . : ';'. '.:, . .... ; ...... ';': ::,' :::.":>:/;~:.>,>::'::,::; :.~:: ~~: ;::'::>: ,>::,:,.:,:::..~~,.:.,:,:;.;::\ .;', ::':, ',.: : ....:.... .... :,:. :.. ". .:'. ". Is the property AbStractor r oiTens;:(to :v~rifY thiS, Call the Aii6kli CtlunrY office at 323"5400 ~ .), . :..' ..:::::tt::~~i;!.?".<':~:T:';:.~:;)9H",';:: ;'~1'-,....':>,'. .... .'. ,.... . .,:,,;' Description of Requ~s~" : We ~ a):e . .r~ql:l.~'S t,ing.;a:',"v~dahce: .cif 'tne' '~'. Y,ar.d :setb~~k'.:. '. :'~;' ': :'. ' ) , '. It' ~~ "pr~s~nt1Y::;5'i'~:~~';;~~~~:"i~:"'~i'~;,:rl:.:~~i~': ~.~t):';~:'.;i~df,~~t:b~~~':f'tQ~"".":::" ..-../:...'..'..:. . ~H~d;.'ol';vi ~,~:;::">~i~':::<:;';\f~;:';:::;};;/:,::>>?:,\,: ',';;' .\~ ~:'>X:: ;'-: ':' :: ,,: i.... :";..';..' :';:' ':.:>' ;:.',: '. , , :. :. ." ./':;:: H>:::':i:~:: :i;:?,};:,~: /'.:?;-?:,{";:.':: .:~::":.::~.' ,,:: ';..,: :.... .. .;.->: ,.:.~:. / :::: . ..u'..:':::.:, :: ::' . , . ',,: , '~~:'~'-:"'" .....:..~.~:...........:.:..H.::.t:<.::.~...'.:...:.: :;,.'.~~":~';; :":\',~,;",':.<.: :.... , h"",,:': . . '. :'::, :....::...: ':'.: . A ha~dship . JI.lust. b.e .tirese~t in.' ~r~er f6r..'iv~ri'a'ii'c~(to be' gr~ii~ed. ".' '. . . . . ,.:.." ',:,::'. ordin~~e:8~:se~ti6n:'s.~~:d~f~~~;:i~~~~:t':ibllU~i~:.,::;,~~~~~~~#:'~~~~cti~;r '.':,:,..:".,::" .:' . ":', ; difficuhi~s C?r unn~es~.haroships,fu ~yw.ayo,(c~ng~;out$.e.St;ict:llitter of,the.' ,.' , ..;,..., : provisions of this ordin~ce; an'appeal m;ty be m!lqe an.d a.vari:p1ce.~ted::,Tii.e: . . ;,' . " .... ~. . .~. . ". '". . ,. . ~ I.. ~ . .' . ( H. . . . . '. ...,..' hardships' or difficulties must have to do with the characteristics ofllie land and not' the. . ~ ' prol'erty o~~~: :~'.:< ...:..;.,,:: r"',:: .~::'>,~:,:'.' ::>:! .... ::':.\:"::,'.;i:.::';::::::",~':. :,'. .:;':;.,.;.',..,~ .; ::: . : ,.,:...'.::.. ~: .~:~,:'... .~ :.< Spec:ific:Hardship During. ,th:e..;plattirig~'f62~,:s"i3',,::';;;g::shpJed'/a;:30 :fOO:t.'s'~tb~:2i': "~n" ..' ,.,. . thepr'~'limiria:~)ipl,a~:>:";D~'r'{~i~,;iH~'\;:i,~t:~'i~~:p~;~~iS~.~~;~~','d'i~p.:'.t:r~~;~~'~t:.' :/.....::, ' ':' ',<: ;. '. . . ..~". ~.",;.,! . ...:....t..::~::.~>~..~~:.:~...?,.::.~ : ,,::.H.' '~:.'~'.'" .. ':''; ;."( '. . ',. .:::. . this varia,n~e'andit' ~aS::misse4:dti.rhlg,.th~.p:rqces5), ..:.We'::hve ':<1;t.,sa: fi1~d:..".. ' . " . ~.;"". ":.:': ':..: .......,.<<~:.:.... ::':'," :"~"''':':..;';'.''.,'':'''''':;\H;': ..... .. .' ": '.' ::.: . c:ov~na~ts a~drestrU:tti:o'~i:.~'p'~'dif,y,in~>,mit;i~~m,s:tie' -'requ:ii~~e~ts"f6ithe '. '" .'~.. homes in'.Cherryw'ood.'Estate!j." :Without'.:t;he var;iance, this lot.will be' ... '." .... M' ---- ~flH'S dWf-r.J OJO ,(QlUfIS 61'11. JO 601<10;] fOP/J/O :310N -pwvet;.1J .1~611J I/Y - ""UI VN/Jf6U3 11"1:) 'I' vo(M./fIS PU01 160"'P/ff - OC -O~ JO ~Dp 61m POlDO llnq6Y .JQ(M./fIS PU01 po6~ DI_Utlfff - PJDo\I!I ., .~DI9 .r-I 00 Slid pD:I't dQD s60d-'f008 r-f'l 00 'ON qor Ilt61 'ON UOJlOJl6{~1J .- . -y ;z: ;! IJ ~8 fifi06-ZlL-ZI9 :xod 6505-ZlL-ZI9 'lId ~. ' I f'Or-fifi 'ulf 'o'fou't II";Off JO Aop pu~~ 6M polDO poo~ .l9o'./~ Is03 OlL ~ '.JQ(MJrw .m ,(q _ oM JOJ polopo; .....q 60~ 'OUJ 'S.laiJU18u;j ITAT:J "i S.lOAiJA.1l1S Ptn77 . .Im ""Iun 'vo;rw.., .Il/l JO ...6olJ1JOW 'CJQUMO l....nb..qm; 01 poP....l"" .1 .JfM.0610~'" UOJ1O:JJJIlJO~ ON puo J.SIDI.ffiN T1IOftUUfff JO -lDIS -'11 JO ~.DI ern Jepun JeMlM.Jns puo7 pec~ A/rip D WD puo UOfSJAJOdrw I~P ~w _un JO .w ~q po;odo;d .0'" 1JOdaJ JO uoJd li'M./flIl .Im 10m ~JIlJO~ ~qa;o~ I 'lI10SfJUUflf ',41rmO:J lI~ ~ 'S3.LY.LS3 aoonm I\UQI\JV::10 ^ /'" / 'z :Jf:JOIH ',. ~''-' GOOZ j7 6 CH1!AJ ~'l@Q;Jll ~ ..., ~ \. _J ~ I / ~ ~ A P ~ <0 .~ ~ .~ 0 \ - A ~ / fgr;:) I:j~ ~~ ~ 11~ IL'SIl9 ) 'H307Jn8 ),8 03/.:!/H3A lSnIV SN0l1VA373 H007.:! 0 SNO/SN31V10 DN/07Jn8 '] '531 't lS3 (}()()1M. ~~3H:J '0 10ld pSp.JO:lS.l Sill uodn ps.oq SI O. .59 's.<s 6u,uOS8 S/III JO uolloIU9f.JO Sill - uo!lOo1s13 'UIMOI/S III.JON IS..lIS ""110 JO pU3 0 'H'N'1 :'f.Jowf/ "".1110 ssslun '.OZt91 S7~. ps'f.Jow punaJ Iuswnuow .d/d 1JO.Jf ..10usG · ssnoH swo.ld POOM 't :6ufPlfng JO .IZtBl S7Y GY'ttlIY. poq,u:lsUf do:! UOflOo'lSJ3 .JOOU IS....07 -rr: SOld 0 IIllNt ps'f.Jow ,os Iuswnuow 0 uOflOo'lsl3 .looU s60.l09 -n f uo.l/ lI:1u/ tl ~q lI:1u/ Z/I sSlouaG .O~ = "I :8/D:1S uo!lOo'lsl3 '1:1018 JO dOl ~ uollOo'lsJ3 6UflS/X3 sSlousG l uoflOo'lsl3 pssodo.ld SSIOUSD ( s60u/o.lG s:loj.Jns S.IOUSG - ~/UO uOflOo'lo:lx3.lod ISS s'folS pooM sSlousG I uosn3.la&!l qOH .IOJ .J.:ffA2IflS JO 3.1 V:JIJI.L2I3:J \ "\ .' ) , / , .-...J '-../ R 29 '00 10:50 FR CITY OF ANDOVER 612 755 8923 TO WOODLAND DEV P.03/05 . /10 Jit"t'.l cttl6{, , . OA,i ([) ~hf 'i,v ~ ( r ) -1- {iJ I NO , ----- ... , VARIANCE REQUEST PAGE 2 ~Wf~lfJh {.:.01_ ~t'. / JUi,f 3f Section of Ordinance Current ZoningyJ i.j.IS' CRITERIA FOR GRANTING A VARIANCE In granting a variance, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendation of thc Planning and Zoning Commission and: l. If the request is in keeping with the spirit and intent oftbis Ordinance. .._"" 2. Ifit finds that strict enforcement ofthis Ordinance will cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration.. 3. If it finds that denying the request does not deny reasonable use of the property. 4. Economic considerations shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of the Ordinance. / , ~ .4_-'" ~ w .... ".. ~.,.. Name of Applicant Woodland Development Corporation Address 13632 Van Buren Street NE, Ham Lake, MN 55304 Fax 763-427-0~92 Signature Date ?- ~ll~ OV Property Owner (Fee Owner) (If different from above) Address Home Phone Business Phone Fax Signature Date ) MAR 29 '00 10: 50 FR C lTY OF ANDOVER 612 755 8923 TO WOODLAND DEV P. 04/05 . , I VARIANCE REQUEST PAGE 3 i The following information shall be ~ubmitted prior to review by the City of Andover: 1. Signed application and scaled drawing showing the following: a. Scale b. North arrow I c. Dimensions ofthe property and structures I d. Front, side, and rear yard building setbacks , , e. Adjacent streets I f. Location and use of existing structures within 100 feet Application Fee: Single Family $125.00 Other Requests $150.00 , , I "- DM' Paid 4/t,( dIJ ) hiS? Y[ i Receipt # I ( I . I I ) I i I CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '- DATE: May 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion Planning and Zoning ITEM NO. Variance (00-11) Front Yard Setback Jeff Johnson 15405 Nightingale Street NW Zoning Administrator 1(V-,Em, LLC Request The City Council is asked to review and approve the variance request of Gor-Em, LLC to allow for an existing single family home to encroach twenty-one (21) feet into the thirty-five (35) foot front yard setback on the property located at 15405 Nightingale Street NW, legally described as Lot 10, Block 2, Fox Hollow. The property is zoned R-4, Single Family Urban. ) Applicable Ordinances Ordinance No.8. Section 6.02 - Minimum Lot Requirements. Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 establishes the minimum setback requirements and requires a thirty-five (35) foot front yard setback from the front lot line. Ordinance No.8. Section 5.04 - Variances. Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04 establishes the variance process. Variances may be granted where there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in any way of carrying out the strict letter ofthe provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. The hardships or difficulties must have to do with the characteristics ofthe land and not the property owner. It should be noted that the City Council is requested to take action on this application due to the time constraints the applicant has in order to construct an attached garage. Section 5.04(F) allows the City Council to waive Planning and Zoning Commission review if time constraints are present. , Page Two I Page Two Variance (00-11) 15405 Nightingale Street NW Gor-Em, LLC , ) General Back~round The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a single family home to encroach twenty-one (21) feet into the thirty-five (35) foot front yard setback. It should be noted that this variance was missed by Staff during the Fox Hollow platting process. The variance is being requested because the principal structure is currently non-conforming. Nightingale Street NW was a County road (1990) and currently has a 120 foot right-of-way width. The variance is based on this right-of-way width. Based on a typical City road right-of- way width of 66 feet, a variance would not be needed. A resolution is attached for your review and approval. J \ , / , CITY OF ANDOVER J COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. - A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE VARIANCE REQUEST OF GOR-EM, LLC TO ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 6.02 WHICH REQUIRES A THIRTY-FIVE (35) FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK AND TO ALLOW FOR AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME TO ENCROACH TWENTY-ONE (21) FEET INTO THE THIRTY-FIVE (35) FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15405 NIGHTINGALE STREET NW, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 10, BLOCK 2, FOX HOLLOW. WHEREAS, Gor-Em, LLC has requested a variance to Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 which requires a thirty-five (35) foot front yard setback and to allow for an existing single family home that will encroach twenty-one (21) feet into the thirty- five (35) foot front yard setback on the property described above. NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council has determined that the variance requested by Gor-Em, LLC meets the criteria of Ordinance No.8, / Section 5.04 and hereby grants approval of said variance on the property located at 15405 Nightingale Street NW, legally described as Lot 10, Block 2, Fox Hollow. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this _ day of _,2000. ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER Victoria V olk, City Clerk J. E. McKelvey, Mayor , ; [ Location Map] l I ; J ': ~ II :- i . (\ I I i )j~1 LL~~~'.'~~ ~ 1 ~J["."'''' ,; l-"""-jl " '-; '"/h.! r ~. I '/1...~'f i i '-L':: I ~ y:f.\ I II 1: 'f.\6 I 13 I' I 'i '~.I'I'" I I ~ 'p- I~. ~s ,,:::,: : I~ , ' [' "";; .". H SA,E'I. -~"~ ,t: . , I ~ ' , "'<-..., 'Si .;. " ' 't< q" ~ a,'" '"~~ I- l I , <>~~': . ~ 1- 1.- . ......){. "'------ ""rc '....." " MI; III /j J....,/! --. ___ ~ tJII"",.J7_~1' ~";Q II ~/ ( ''/ , Ii, ~ ................ I o/!~ ~ 0>. ".1;,:c;. ~J-- . ~'vl- . ., -'..'~ ~ '^ I '(::\//' 2 .c... ~ I ""-; -:''f'Si.j"J, ",.. ~ 14 .- ., . !:/ ""----' i """I I '" ,I . ...~ "./,...... '"" ,," ~ \ I LI.LI:I..i..111 ".......... I I',..! -t1 I. "'j' .. . It.." ""_ ~~.. 'l'I"r'LoJ 1"'1"'1" , l ~. I ., .,""f..4 " "2T. ~ 11>' .. ~ .) I,: ::~ ' I .' ,I II - ~""E!TAnJ' ~ , 4J.'""1> 'I '''''It:' "',,' '. I ~; I., l' 110 '0 P"AII~UC' rdALE' t, ~J .... I ~~~~.. .1, ~l~t~1: ,I' ~ '"J . if(s-, .1iJ ~ i!':"W AI/DDLE ~ ~ ", ~"t' '~.~ -< / /OA;"$I . . " I ~"I I ,'q " (il>.:::'<:;. ,,0" ':/ ~ '1'1 . '5CHOOL '.,,' 'X',",1<l ! ~ . 1.1 '''''',y.,a - ~ t, . 'f-T-/OI' I,. 10, I ' ~ ., . l. I .. , .' r," Ii .j .. " ,- - ~ iiJ;TO]i.... ~" : lil; ~'I ,<(,- 1 lJi?' H4A(1/'''ON .1 >.... I I ! t\i J>,A.' "I~ ' :b sQl/ARe .~~.. '>"~ I I LJ. 2, 5\;.,) I I I .,.<.: I I F~E DEPARTMENT '7 ~ff, ':, ~: ',,~ ~ II _ _ 1 I I I (f;',0'(} __' i!i.~ ~! ~~. _ ~_____ ., .,,"- r.\ ., ''''-",....,\.'., .. ~ "'.",,," ."tJo'I./.':l'.~-liLH_'"'iI ~ l." \ "om'''''" . 11_1111 Ii"{ fJ .. '1-7.'!;!. . ' IT ,10, r;tJ~'$ ""',, ~: T.J-!,.Jl.!O"::;:'" ~I' /' " -", I ... tI I[ I " "" s 11 1 . '~~II' I I' I;'TE.~: ^[!: i ~, i "17, un:. ," I "-. r.:.:c, " 'r~ "'...,,,- ,': ..'" ~.' ~ Ii- h . I ". =.,,;! ~ :1.t+""~~d!Et i'''-. r.\1'1;/1It~~ :!lli,.. ~~ ~.~ I _ ~'-"~"''';'''''''.-'"'''->;,,, ,"\','I'~II.I'I''''IIIT1.I'f'Fo/l '.1.1; . ..., / / JIll , " APR 25 '00 11 i.54 FR CITY OF ANDOVER 612 755 8923 TO 7551117 P.02/05 ,. . . . , J . CITYofANDQVER, 1685CFlOSS.TOWt;s~OU~E'JMO N.W," ANDOYER;MINNESo.iA .553040 (6'2) j55.51 00 '.. '. 'Y~d~6.~STF~~:' . . '. . . . '.' PioP"o/~' . .';fU;i"/}):fi:/1,5S;: . ... ',' ~ .' .......: ..':;" .:. "'_~."'.',':.r!",:..':;' :'-:,.' .,:' .-:. "-"". ., ,...... ';'., " ,','. ,", '. Lot ,Addition < PIN;'. , J . ~~Mri:~A:1:f#~~W5)?14rt0cJ . Y ,."' . ",: . - ,,: n:, ",', ~ , " , .;, ': "". '-:'.' . :: '_. .... _' ~ ,', ',;. :-<:":",,, >" ::;: '_'. "l. _ ,,' " ': , :;"" .'~ _ . ." ", ,':- _' :. . A hardshipmustbepl:ese'nt in,or~erfoi.:!lva~ianc~.tobegr~!nted. .... . '. . ' ""'. . .~:. .' .. -; "., . - ' .." .;..".," . . ~ ' .' ',' , Ord~ce8. S~iiml' 5.04defides ah~hiptlSfcillo~"i:':~'Wb~re,th,~re,.~ pricticaI' . difficulties orwuiecessaiy. hardships .in any wavof- ca.rtyj~g'outtlj.e sm<;t letter of. the .' i . ",' , """'.: ',' -:' ">:' .:;' ',__, '.. '.":' .,"-,.','" "," ',' _,,_, '," : , provisions of this Ordinance; an.appeal inay be mild,e ~davli.rian~egI'em:ted; The . '. hardships' Qr. difBc'Olties. milSthave to do wlth1he' ~haract:ristic~ofthc i.iUtd and not the, . =::::~: .....,.tiu),g4~j........f<<'ll;'),~~<'j~0,-..... ... v4f1iirJ04}r&2.- .... ... . . { . {' ",.', , .. " ' . .-' . . . . . . / APR 25 '00 11: 55 FR C!TY OF ANDOVER 512 755 8923 TO 7551117 P.03/05 . , . , . .. , VARIANCE REQUEST / PAGE 2 Section of Ordinance Current Zoning CRITERIA FOR GRANTING A V ARlANCE In granting a variance, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and: 1. lfthe request is in keepir.g with the spirit and intent of this Ordinancc, 2. If it finds that strict enforcement of this Ordinance will cacse undue hardship because of circumstances unique to tile individual property under consideration. 3_ If it finds that denying the request does not deny reasonable use of the property. 4. Economic considerations shall not constiMe an undue hardship if reasonable use of the property exists uuder 111e terms of the Ordinance. , 1"""- . , / Name of Applicant t!?~,(,- .c/P , .AA...-C- " Address / t!J -:?7A h4# .f/l,J /h..J/ b.J7..d /-p. '.:-6- Home Phone Business Phone ?6'?--.//A Fax 7J77'///7 S;gMtm. ~ ~p Date ~ ~.5--=- 62-& . ( Property Owner (Fcc Owner) (If dilTeTllnl fro:n above) Address Home Phone Business Phone Fax: Signature Date / APR 25 '00 11' 56 FR C!TY OF ANDOVER b12 755 8923 TO 7551117 P.04/05 . . . . / V AlliANCE REQUEST PAGE 3 The follo\\ing infonnation shall be ?ubmitted prior to review by the Cily of Andover: I. Signed application and scaled drawing showing the follOVl.ing: a. Scale b. North ::>.rrow c. Dimensions ofthe property and structures d, Front, side, and rear yard building setbacks e. Adjacent streets f. lAlcation and use of existing structures within 100 feet Application Fee: ~ Single Family Other Requests $]50.00 Date Paid 4(~1 (J) Receipt # &/ ~ 7 ~ I ... I AFR 25 '00 11:56 FR CITY OF ANDOIJER 512 755 8923 TO 7551117 P.05/05 -, , . , i Variance Process . A Public Hearing Notice ",ill be sent out to all property owners and residents within 350' feet ofthe applicants proposed property. . A sign stating "Proposed Land Use Change" is placed on the applicants properly to inform interested residents of the public hearing. (For Public Hearing information please call the informationa.l hotline at 767-5126). . City staff will conduct an on site inspection which includes taking pictures of the property for the Planning and Zoning meeting. . A staif report is prepared on the Friday before the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. This report can be obtained by calling City Hall (755-5100). It is important that the applicant attend the Planning and Zoning meeting, . Questions may be addressed to the applicant from ihe public or commission members. . The Planning and Zoning Commission will vote to forward the item to the City Council with a recommendation of approval or denial. The Commission may also table the item in order to obtain further information. . A hardship must be present in order for the Planning and Zoning Commission to ) recommend approvaL . The variance item is placed on th~ City CO'-lllcil Agenda as eitJl~r a non-discussion or discussion hem. . A Resolution by the City CouIlcil is filed at Anoka County Recorders' Office. rev1s~~ 10/29/99 g:/tlatalsc;.f!;mhaJ'lleltlv:l!lance.coc 3:20/00 , . / *~ TOT~L P~GE.05 ** CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY \ SWENSON LAND SURVEYING, INC. -./ 14980 Waco Street RONALD J. SWENSON Ramsey, Minnesota 55303 TELEPHONE REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR (612) 427-1020 . Denotes Iron Monuments Found SURVEY FOR: G()R. - E. M DevELO p""ef.)T o Denotes Iron Monume~ Set Scale 1 inch equals feet Book l4-0 Page (,z.. Invoice No. ~"" I SS9" 15 'ZD'~ It 8./!iz. Ss- ~ r -r;j $)0 I~. '" ~ 4S'~ ,,0 "< r E){(~TlN~ I ~€ ~ ~ oj 'I. - I In Ul 10 ...., ~ \1;l P~. Ii... <>;) ~ $ ~ \..u' , ro G.4~ I ...... .') ~ 42.(,,"" [0 5'.0 J Zo N ~ 0- ~ \,l) ~4J ls.o <'(\ --!l ~ < ,<:::I , <) I "... ..... ..... ~ \-.. () .. () ..... ~ :( '< ..... ~'O '< 10 " ~ ~ . NJ8~ t)z 't.4''E: Il-of.li} I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of: Lot 10, Block 2, FOX HOLLOW, Anoka County, Minnesota. . It does purport to show improvements or encroachments, if - '\ a~r~e~s11th day of April 2000. -./ Swenson 'Land Surveying, Inc. Ronald J. Swenson, Registered Land Surveyor, Mn License No. 13297 ... , , .. ~ .. ~ .. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \ / DATE: MAY 2,2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT NON DISCUSSION ITEM DAN WINKEL, W. FIRE CHIEF D~ ITEM NO. \~ROV AL TO SELL SURPLUS FIRE ENGINE \ . Staff is requesting City Council approval to sell reserve fire engine #6 to the City of Bethel. This vehicle has been for sale for about 1 12 years or since the new engine was placed into service at Station #2. The fire truck has been advertised for sale in the Anoka County Union and also the Minnesota Smoke Eater that is sent to most fire departments in Minnesota. Two sealed bids were received on Tuesday, April 25, 2000. The first from Anoka Hennepin Technical College is to pay $7,500 for the truck. The original college proposal was to exchange the bid value for an equal amount of firefighter training. The training could be done over an extended period of time. On Tuesday, April 25, I was informed that the college would also pay the entire amount of$7,500 cash to , the City for the truck. . J The City of Bethel submitted a bid of$15,000 to be paid over a ten- year period. The City of Bethel does not have the dollars to purchase the vehicle without some kind of payment plan. The Bethel Fire Department will also be selling a vehicle with the proceeds going to the City of Andover. I have enclosed both bids for your review. If council approves the concept of a payment plan, staff recommends selling the vehicle to the City of Bethel. The vehicle will be sold immediately with council approval. / A Community That Cares t April 20, 2000 Andover City Hall 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 RE: Bid for fire truck To the members of the Andover City Council, The City of Bethel would like to place a bid to purchase the fire truck that you have for sale. The city council approved a bid of $15,000.00 payable to '. the City of Andover in annual payments of $1,500.00 over the next ten .I years. The first payment will be made in January of the 2001 budget year and every year after for the next ten years or until the debt is paid in full. In addition the City of Bethel will sell one of our trucks and the proceeds will go to the City of Andover towards the payment of our debt. The City of Bethel would like to thank you for your consideration in this manner. If you need additional information regarding this matter please contact the City of Bethel at (763)434-4366 or Asst. Chief Shane Swedeen at (763)328- 6849. / , 165 Main Street NW.. p.o. Box 64. Bethel, Minnesota 55005. 434-4366 ~ @~ '\ A Community That Cares Andover City Hall April 20, 2000 . 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 RE: Statement for our fire truck bid To the members of the Andover City Council, The City of Bethel would like to thank you for your consideration of our bid to purchase your fire truck. We want to make just a couple of statements regarding this matter. First, by awarding us the bid it would give your city the opportunity to benefit from this truck again in the event that our fire department is called to your city for mutual aid, as it happened last may during the wildfire. Anytime your city fire department needs additional help our firefighters will be able to respond with appropriate equipment. Secondly, by allowing the ten year payment plan, our city would be able to significantly improve the fire protection to our city and surrounding communities. Without the payment plan however, the city would be unable to improve its fire protection for another several years. Both of our cities will benefit from this deal over the next 20-30 years. We intend on using your truck for at least 20 years, if the bid is accepted. We hope this information helps you understand our position and our dilemma regarding this matter. If you have any questions please contact either Bethel City Hall at (763)434-4366 or Asst. Chief Shane Swedeen (763)238-6849 Sjnce~ , ~/'-et;~/~- ; 165 Main Street NW. · P.O. Box 64 · Bethel, Minnesota 55005 . 434-4366 , Our Problem Is... We only have one engine. The NFPA (National Fire Protection Agency) requires each fIre department to have a back up engine to use. Therefore, we are not meeting the requirement of having a second pumper. This means that if our one engine is not rnnning and we're at or get called to a fire, we are sitting ducks. We need a second engine! Uniortunately, our department has minimal man power. The more water we can bring to a fire in one truck, the less man power will be needed to supply water at the scene. A pumper that has more water in the tank could save a structure, and we could keep more firefighters on the scene actually working to put out the flames. Also, our pump capacity with Engine 1 could not keep up to the required gallons per minute of water flow needed to put out a large fire. We need at least 1750 gpm of water flow; our Engine 1 has a pump capacity of 750 gpm. With a second engine, we could meet -, this requirement. , - , , The engine that our department calls "Engine 2" is not legally an engine. Its purpose is to transport water. This truck has a 1500 gallon tank. It also has a 250 gpm pump that is used for grass fires or dumpster fires, but it can't be used as an interior fire fighting engine. For an engine to be legally used as an interior fIre fighting engine, it must have a pump size of at least 750 gpm. With a second engine we would still have a 1500 gallon tank, but we would also have a 1900 gpm pump on it as well. This would meet and exceed the requirements for an engine. Another reason we need to at least meet the requirements is because our city has grown larger than ever before due to the addition of both homes and businesses. Many of the businesses are in large buildings that are not equiped with water sprinklers. This possesses a great threat to the business and increases the fire department's responsibility to be able to supply enough water in the event of a fire. The bottom line is the city has grown, but the fire department has not. We cannofprotect people and buildings if we don't have the proper equipment. We need to step up to the plate and take action. We need a second engine! ; 1 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION , / DATE: MAY 2,2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT NON DISCUSSION ITEM DAN WINKEL, FIRE CHIEF j)~ U). ITEM NO. D(~OSAL OF SURPLUS EQUIPMENT Staff is requesting City Council approval to sell three Gamma-Goat grass fire vehicles to the City of Maple Plain Fire Department for one dollar each. The Gamma-Goats, or all-wheel articulating vehicles, were used by the fire department to fight wildfires during the late 1980s or early 1990s. Two of the vehicles are parked at fire station number two and are used for spare parts only. Both of these vehicles are unable to operate or be driven. The third vehicle is parked at Don Eveland's property on Crosstown Boulevard. Staff has been informed that the vehicle was driven there and parked. All three of the vehicles were purchased from the Surplus Equipment Distribution Center in Arden Hills. Our records indicate that Andover invested $7,500 to purchase all three vehicles. The agreement with , / the Distribution Center states that when the fire department is no longer using the vehicles they must be returned to the Center or sold or given to another fire agency that has certified operators. The Maple Plain Fire Department has certified operator's that completed the appropriate operators course from the Minnesota D.N.R. The Maple Plain Fire Department will pick up all three vehicles. The current condition of the vehicles does not warrant trying to sell them and staff believes the cost to hire and transport them back to Arden Hills will exceed whatever value they may have. Staff is recommending to sell the vehicles to the Maple Plain Fire Department for one dollar each, as long as they pick up all three vehicles. \ J CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION , / DATE: MAY 2.2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT NON DISCUSSION ITEM DAN WINKEL, FIRE ClllEfl W \q, L~ . ITEM NO. RETURN OF SURPLUS EQUIPMENT Staff is requesting City Council approval to return two surplus vehicles to the Minnesota D.N.R. The 1970 Dodge 4 x 4 Pick-up and the 6 x 6 All Wheel Drive 2 Y, ton Truck were donated by the D.N.R. and are no longer in use. Both vehicles are in need of repair that will probably exceed the value of the vehicles. The contractual agreement for use of the vehicles states that they must be returned to the Minnesota D.N.R., Willow River facility when no longer in service. City Staff will remove the emergency lights and sirens from the trucks. The City did pay to install the lights and sirens and also paint both vehicles. The City will have to get quotations for transporting the vehicles to Willow River. Because of needed repairs and current condition of both vehicles, we will not be able to drive them to Willow River. , J Staff is recommending the return of both vehicles as soon as transportation can be arranged. / @ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '. ) DATE: Mav 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion/Consent Item Scott Erickson,~ [ Engineering ITEM NO. Response to Builders Assoc.lOrdinance 247/ Right-of-Way Management JO. This is an informational item for the City Council. Attached is a letter dated April 4, 2000 from Karen Christofferson of the Builders Association of the Twin Cities for your review regarding their concern of the fee schedule for the Right-of- Way Management Ordinance, which was recently approved in March by the City Council. It is recommended to continue with the fee schedule as approved and evaluate the fee schedule at the end of the year. We will continue to work with Ms. Christofferson regarding '. this item. J If the City Council should have any questions, feel free to contact Todd or Scott. '. ) \ April 4, 2000 Mayor J.E. McKelvey Members of the City Council City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304-2612 Dear Mayor McKelvey and members of the Council: On behalf of the Builders Association of the Twin Cities I am writing regarding the right- of-way (ROW) fee schedule and ordinance adopted in the city of Andover in January of this year. Our BATC members have been doing business in Andover for many years and were surprised to learn without warning or any inclusion in the process, of a costly new fee schedule. We request the city of Andover suspend their fee schedule until the city, affected builder/developers and utility companies have the opportunity to collaboratively construct a fee schedule based on actual costs incurred by the city and not on fee schedules that are borrowed from other cities. . The Builders Association of the Twin Cities is not objecting to the fee schedule but we are objecting to setting a fee schedule that is not tied to actual costs incurred by the city. It is our understanding that pursuant to state statutes the city's fees must reflect a fair representation of the actual cost to the city to manage its public right-of-way. We also note that the City, under the new state law governing management of public rights-of- way, must also assess right-of-way management costs to itself. Therefore, it would seem not only fair but reasonable the city would want to evaluate actual costs incurred rather than rely on cO,st comparisons or cost averages reviewed in other cities. Our association members would appreciate the opportunity to work with the city as soon as possible to help the city evaluate the actual costs associated with the imposed fees. 651/697-1954 2960 Cemre Poime Oriw Fax 651/697-7599 Roset'ille, ,\finncsotLl 551 13-1 1:22 Parane Fax 651/697-7575 Please advise us as soon as possible of your willingness to work with us and other affected parties to establish an accurate ROW fee schedule for the city of Andover. CC: Gary Gorham, Gorham Builders, Inc. and member of the BATe Board of Directors; Tony Emmerich, Tony Emmerich Construction, Inc.; Colette Jurek, Northern States Power; Public Policy Committee and Board of Directors of the Builders Association of the Twin Cities; Todd Haas, City of Andover j - ~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ) DATE: Mav 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion/Consent Items Todd Haas, ., Engineering ITEM NO. Approve Plans & Specs/00-14/ ~~42XX Round Lake Boulevard Construction The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications for Project 00-14, 142XX Round Lake Boulevard NW. If the City Council recalls from the last meeting, the property owner requested water be brought to the property. Two water services are being requested (one for the existing home and one for the vacant parcel that is being considered to be split by the property owner. ( \ , J , ) CITY OF ANDOVER , COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING OF QUOTES FOR PROJECT NO. 00-14 ,FOR 142XX ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD NW . WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 091-00 , adopted by the City Council on the 18th day of April , 2000, City Enqineer has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 00-14 for 142XX Round Lake Boulevard NW . WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to the City Council for their review on the 2nd day of May ,2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications. \ MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the / City Council at a reqular meeting this 2nd day of May , 2000 , with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk , , <5J CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Mav 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion/Consent Item Scott Erickson,~( Engineering ITEM NO. Award Bid/99-28/Navajo St., 173rd Ave. & 175lh Ave. 8f). The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting bids and awarding contract to Bauerly Companies in the amount of $111,247.75 for the improvement of Project 99-28, Navajo Street NW, 173rd Avenue NW & 175th Avenue NW. The bids received are as follows: Contractor Bid Amount Bauerly Companies $111,247.75 .. , North Valley $129,920.90 " Hardrives $139,782.93 Northwest $141,529.15 WB Miller $141,935.60 Barber $148,632.90 DMJ $170,600.31 Engineer's Estimate $113,962.70 Bauerly Companies has successfully performed other projects for the City. -- > ~_~_e r r d II) III - RN I- w ~ ~.~ ,nl- " ~ ~ - ~l 8" hmL w ~ ~ w , w! j j !~ i~ i~~j'l~ ~ i S~"i~;~U~ 1: ~ -' R ~& -, jdJ1J~, ! ~~ 'h~! ~.~O.~ ":g i'. 1 ; iJ n tl1ii~! ~ ~ I ~I ~"i~.~tl~ ~ih 6 [N I i I ~i a Jill' r.:j~~ii~~ I~~d~n~., _.Q, j 1 J l> ljl8 ~ i , t!J "~~ ~ @ ~ U 3 ~ r ~ ~ 0- 0:::, ~ . i i ~ ~~ ;!~ib;!;~ . i _-L i 1 ~'H~~h~'~~!~~~~!~~~~H ~~~ ~ ,,~, ~ I I d~. jllii!L -~ )1 n JJ i ~ ~ 2. 0Ilo.,x."oU'+H.o H++' ~ ~ " ~ j ~ ~ ~~ I~ ~h:.ii~ h~" li~1 ~ n if i t ~.!i; ::: ~ .icY" ,0,' i; l i n H .~H;I.iH ~~!!'~ il~~! U ii H ~ i : )U~:= ~.. ~ ~ ".~ l} l 8 II . j;<~, .,,8 -i" '61" ~ ;,;, __,' ~. . .~~",~ --,,_ .., """i~ ~~. ~ -'Z" 1l'illl1 l.i ~~ e b..,. 6 66 .~ ~ ! d ~ ;;; ~dd.=. . . , . - - 0 t. "'l-,'. " " . '" .i'~~ a ~j! L i! ~ n~~'l!!} , , ,i!l . : ~,~,' ~ ~ 1 ! f ~ l'!~ l~ ',;;~Ml~ ' , g , ., .* ~, ~ ~~; c:: c:: g:~~~! ", " .',"6" '", ~. ffi .f il ." H D . 00_. T '~,~ ! i 'ia~! u s;j s~ mm~H I~ ~ ~ " !N1'! ~ ~ I ~~ ~;mi~ mil! "I j~ ~im~ '"tJ ~ i, H ~~ ~i, ~!! ~~ ! ;l.H;ffl ~ ~~ ; ~H Ji ~ ~ ~ ~ ;] ~!!l!d ~~~~f~I'~ '~ ~ ;d.~ ~~ ~. h~ ~i5 ! ."~thh. l ~~ i ~ N f ~ . G ~ 9 F:1 . ....... " i i: i ~z~ ' ' ~"'~'-, 'I "j". ' , .._.._"~, , ~"m_" , . " .....'ll.._ I "'_r.."""",,,_OI I ......'" 1-------------------------'--_"t' -"-'-, J- r;:: "7 ~ ~" ffi '... ,:~~-::::;:~~?~~~~~:=.:~~?:'~~~~::-=~~~~~~;c;:-~~~;--=-.=~,;;-~ - - - i - - - - - - - - - - -" -~~~~; , ~ ~ > ANOKA cOUNr-;i;~l'lii:EiAx:~'-.:~:.. ..- -"Q{,u;/.;' Roaci.~ik~-20--- "; u"--~~;~T,,OF::..~AT-llI;AT NO, 20 ~ g ~::l ~ ~ 0 "-----, -- '---'';5' C~'i::.. /161st Avenue "J'\T'W_'I.:::-.., --1 ~'i::. J h-=-~:::;,-"-..-'-h-h M.' : O ~ 0 C~ ~.., --,~ -- -:-----~' ~'-:>i" - , "'F~~ =".) .. ..-, '.. J - ....-=- ~-!Ii ~!l LU S2. 0 ---, -- ..:~'l!'-=-~,;~,;,-; _, _-- __ -,-, ,', _ ~~,<< __ ,""_ '",,-- ,,,,.c.c'c.--,,,, r, ~, , > '-~~---Z-1-----r---1' -'\ 1 ,~." ~"""'~"'1Z' c"'!:'..~ -- -."'..":;; -----'--, 0 '" 0 V . ~-~~m- ~ ......... \ I ; ~ IX' IX'. "' t"\, . -- t.O <( [ " " ---" I , 0 Ai 0 0 ~ ,- I I '", -'-, , I ~ I I r " ~ ' ' , W '-' u.. I I "'- -'1, -"'----!! I ~ V J ~ 0 0;:, 0 I ',% "", i ! ~ '~''', I o ,q" . -, , ". _~" , , ' I W ::::< ~ I E ji t ", -;_-.:::c~: ----l-,"--'-J i z ~ a: I 5 \ ": ". : . ,Q '..c:'., ''', I \" r'-- ! I ~ ~ - , " ',' , ,--h~--'-(r-'-'-t-"-"-----_---- ---- ",P;o l;o: \ Lr , I I"' '1:" c::> ''''''hT-'-'--_u---,,-:-,,__,_~,_,~,,;;:;_,__,___.._~:~:z; '/~, II -=-1 i i ~ ' " , / >p ~ 10' , ' " , , I .'t., . . 0.... !:-~~S' 0..... ~.. ........-- , I '- " .} 01"') ~. .. N' __'.'-'1-""" '0, q -, ! 1'-'-------'''1'-''- -,-..,- c----""7.."~...,,,. '" {J)jo -m--...:;}~.._------,__,_'_L...'__h_,.._.., ! I '. ,f / . t0p I. , : I' l'! ~' I, 11'>'- ~ ~o ,.t E.. I ,! 1\ - , ...,,=- I " ....-~:! '<;f- li~~ : I ' ! ..-...-. I '., ~!~ "''J.t, ' I I ! I [ I",'!~. {3 ~li : i I ~ , I " tIj / \ .. ",.1, I I : I 0 U' .. I I ....~..,,~ ."'.~t~~.." };t {Ii'- \ .,....! ' " ': I I lill -- , "-'--.-- _ ~;'~llIe2~,,",~.9f 4 ../J) I ,. . " I I j ,. ('J), ' t " 1 - -, I/:~ ~ / / l,t! I ~-"'----"'-'-"-r'----"'---'_j: 15 ii ~ ~ , I' S~~j?24 "&.1.., "liI s...tII....r1M~0l0l21O.00fMt..,\IIe__ I '... e-. 0 " ,- ! '~''':-, ~l .. ~ij',Q< / ~ i . A '; ;::::.:::::...":'::'I:.."K'1'.;'J;:......: !.., ~" I ( ,c~-~-h c"--"'I"-!,-",, -~"'f--' c---!."~'--, 1..-i::::?7 I ~M 8, ~I I ~ o~, , ,r" -i-!- {~, :':: ~, ' I: .&~ \ 0" '....'",.... i '[ _ ~ ~' I 'l'\f ',',,: 1 ,\~j, -- j' / T \ S89'07'2~"E ' I' ----------- 'h\ ,\ \ I ~I' ~ \ r ........... ~'" '\ '. _ . 2700~--r~L .. _~. ~n \ \ \ \ \ I 2 \ I I /4 I M. 30 8 8 8 . U4J. 8 8.__- '... ('J) "n-t,--'---m-----n'-~i\~'~'il~~alW'~" a~I:,~::\,,1 'i~I"".....:~"" ,__,8,-r-808-/ ---J--l~'------ ~' ~' , I ~ \ \ t \ t I..LO \ \:} '~~if}-i~ ':.\~ \-... 'w.>>1~ _AIL __",:_____.:::;..__J1 . ~ I. II t I" ~ll~"--""""'" 1~ .....1 .f. .'" ci:D~__;::.::~__ __, . , 'I ': \ "t'\'\l' ' ,-, ~ ,a". "..,.. \ ,lOt, <., ' ,,__=0-::=--:__======" _: / .. . I '\ 1 ,,!. I ~'I... ......l ~ 1 '(.......... ~ ___ ____;::::.-___ ...... ._~L,~ ~'4:'<~ -~ '<'_n.__J ~;;:;,-~ ~i j '6)\~' , ~~. --- -' t ,;'; , - 'I "--- I \ I ~ " . ... ... .t.'U "'~t.1 I ... ;::::----,..,.11 2 j'L ...-9L"1\ 8 ,,\ I \ .... \ "oll' 1 I . --J. .l.J ..~....L...-___._. t,),O -,---t'-,,,------ '-'-'-' ~ 'l.fgWV'~,wiNrE N),lf.;-..~ " '\\.""~l<-7<)LA..,~), "'" ~3l'_"':~~-==~':':'::rr,'1'---,- I ~, ' , i 1.' "'l'.l~,.ee' 8'. ';"t ... ':un, ... ,S.... ... ~n,~ ",f' '... ....-;.,..~ __-. - ,'~: . ~ ..' 'I Sft~ I I r ~ir: \''-.... ""', ... ~~':J1'~ __;:::,-:",___:,.-~~---' 2 J'!r,I' ---lb,~ \ I I -.- r-------___ 1 I ,................""" l..~.e3).: '- .:.::~ :;-;_--7,;/----- '" /l:ll"'1 !' ' '-~~-' -'- ,." ',~-..,'--....-~..~~\ I;..';;. ~." ,', 3 " ; ,:1, ' "I I .. I ~ ' I ' L ~\~, .... ~ ...3..>2 ,..~~;;rf:, I' ,.....~... 1-- 4- j,f.1" \ 1J.22G....Il'" III" .. \ I, .. , II I I ,'U I I '-... R-20.GG _.' I I ' _~""_".f"'~ I ~ \ CUG",", ...,' III'.., ! ~'" I ": I :ro~~ JO....3O I bo~S2".... ! II!! I! k"7~ "" " - \ I :'il'-~_-_.J I ' , , ~ri "1/" / "L-- ." 16 i :_.1 : '" "'/' .,,' '.__"'~==!=! ~.. , ", !, " 'Co. 'n -~- I 'h j, . , ,-', ' ~, ,-' ' 'g' '1)( X, ,/, ,~_______ ___--,~" !, I IjI.. -' : I'~ ~'- " II' - '-" /',., " _______"r, 'II. ',1 " " , ;".-...-. ~ ' ,.t: .,' ' '_J~,!,':;:" ': r'J~~' "", ~\ ~ ~I-i"" '~' ;!\~I " '! I V 1... I ,-, '_J ~... : '", +-' , --f ': '_n \, I", Is .... \ . \, \\'~~~1 _.,.: : I:, ~ 1:, - , "'--':r---"______~ ~------ ~~ ----' , '" II ' .. "I -, "'.0 1 ~ -" ' - ----, r--- ,- - --- ---- ---- ----,,, "I ' \,\, , "I:!1N , ... 'I " {I -!-- f3lj" ~ I I"'~ l r-- ---------<.-, ~ I 1flJ3'::' ~mlmll\ ___-. I: VI :t; I ('1" I I' I I l;u,29 I" I l'!:1 1,1, , '___,. ~ '2 I ",::.' JSI\\ 8. \ 2 I,. 8: 15 !!~I"'/l 2 ,/ 3! !tL____ ~_T2..:__~ Ii: : J 11! ~~: '....J. .... 11. -a.fl I, I" \ J.pt VlZ fJ) ., 0. Ii: 111 . I 1 I 18 r --------__, t!-+1 r "'-II) ~, ! /J<~ -t...-f!'- ~- 1 I "~-a."- I Sil ~1J'l:e"""". 1$ I 1'''. !~11." I 'I' I MV<ncd ~ 1 ii('~- 1 ~: : oni :: I -"\: : " ,_ :r,n": i I ~ ~.g .,,:., ('J)' ..,.. , !--'-,-.... ,'If," L___~_____::::__-' L - ---~----"---' ,luc ___ '____ J .', \ 5 ','I ( ! ii' v.. ~ I [ /: It, r-I-- -------, r-- -- 1-- --, ----\-.-- _ _ _ ~ II 43' ...."- : It, I j I :r: .<( (j I'//II>J I I 1~n I I p. I, r ~, 1", t2ll_ ;1:,1 I --~--!--------.1 I .....l:....C I 1'\'\ i ,'("'1s~:/ 3 : :. .: ,'''''' I: ,'"\,,,.,,~ '~ll:," I oio;o,)) I ~ ,(!f! 00 ~v :., 8: / 1. /1..: ! 3 \: ,/ L::::::~::::::~",' I' a. ~-;; ~ I .,., 1 ',1/,,1 Pt") I 11,803...1\. 1:11 j:t:: III I I I~;I 1 \ ',,8 I r 1:'.03 t1:tl',.#' ~I ~O~W 'N " ,- h,~__, h-----I4.<lt",8ID 1 .,,-l :..., : [:'kW':':- \ I : r 'J:ti'~:~ : " I r i "q:,' II [' .. ~ I (,,( z J _w", ,... " " , , i ,,'11 " .,. (6 j\:!I\1 _~ ~~ ::.:: ------.:8- .J.,....___ L_____________....J L___t::=.~_'...J l__~c=:::::::-:t. I I 1f' t I' CD' ~l ' "' l:> i ,f '/"1' A iUI'- ,,~;---- -j ~i' i--;~-l--'j f--!~"~~-;l::-:::~ : ;..; I /.11'.:;:.' :,\1. ~::-,,_-,_ i ~ ' '-, .,.. ,';'/( ~"l · :~.: \ I:: I"a;:: ,L--_~"':.'?mtl~: <oP [!;i ! ~~, i /1,1, '''''~. '. ,_ 13 \.., J.': i :z; ...____,_____'__... 1Xl8 ' w '. I' ",(~ (u~~: .,,- :" !:l ~'1 "~n~. '_L, -,-~~.,--- :-'18' .' ~l":" ',.?'-,^" I"' ' 1'';'/ / ~,U I I ~ : ../G27""'" _ J$ I I"::-__~-- ...~.} I E--i.: '. ~~...... \ , 't 1 '(.ll R J.. I S8t'0T24"[ I....... : / ---- ......~ : I ~/:~~- -...:i,,! C"Il ~I \7 I IJJ.... II . ~- '1\1 ,,' ~- l..________'=.::::::...__..J - L '" ..J .) I"~~ -'ll!7 -,'1\\\\ III' ~ .......11iI ~ I - '---'--w--" .. c- ---- ------ - -', - - -- -".w, ---~ _,>I, ,\, , 'kll'':;:'' "I "'l , o " I ,\\ O'i -l' .. r---- -------, ,:17; -,." - ---- ....., \\\' I sw&,.. I ~-+---_ 1 ' \\ 1,'0: 131M I /:.- I lJO." : ~l,~~~:' ~~.... ~~~_- -"'~'l~ '~,\),' L____ .,.~~___~_\_J t'" i .- I I" . II ........ '- ___ -1 I I I \ I 0 ,~I 81 5 I I 3 g I :fl"'/ '-', "4-- ,(I. I,i' ~ ~------ _____., i. I 8 " ' Shed os"! $1 ,nM...n 18 { 81 : 12 I ~ till __.... -5.... -- \ \i~l~ I,,' t.> I ':Jt.\e \ 1 --., i _ ~ I ,.tl I a.2~" III I .1 IHl3'",,"1t ,: I~/ff."/ ........ '~'3~-" '1_lji '/ 1 I i \ 1 J \' , -'--- . I: J-,. :; I i~7 ""'" " 'i~lll..,.,;;. '--0;1\ I, \\ \~ ~~ I :3: 8~ \1 ~ 1 ~ .....m..~ !I&! serG7'24"[ - 6'1.. I : 1Mti4" I ';i?;'fff;t.. .'JICLJ~\ '\ ,!\~ ~~{ tll [~II'''' ')l' t "'" Ii!.. ~ -.._,- ~ -------------....' L ~'.''ifiil1<,'" \- ,,1, "'~ , -.. '11 ' . ~'" .------ ..\...",'........, r----~3~----1--1.....! [:;:j" - ~::::I: -P'; ~jr:f:-:7~ij~7\~~~I;\ 'f!!t " L____~.i::_ _J ~---.._.-ll j ~ ... I J .... "'r f,t$ iJ I" " ,. ',' . r- ---- -----..., ;1'-11:",... I N ~ ",- 81 6 II" IJ/J;'/? ~'/'6' \ \ \ \:11\'11 I r-'~2S '-.J...,1... ........ :ill "- 18 8"... 11 1'i1l " \ \ \ ,\ .,",' ,..._.... I r- I. 0 -- "...,.... : 4~":'. ('i ':"'''''' ~~--:'e~~/ /~.tl\...;.:,-\ \\ll-~~\\\';! ~j-~..~ 9 111r: !! I ~ "'" : ""',.,,,,, : / ~'::" ,: \ '. ,~) '. '. \ \,' ';!,,~ ": / \l:Jl'_..... :i '....., I ~ " L_____________U , L";ii~, '\I '":',; ,'-1-1-' !:,~\;;""" " I ~ " r---- - ---- -, ;,0 L_____ -----+l~ll..AA!;, \.-~- -~_::_:....-t-..,I.-I_~i r(~~('f I Ifl~.... I -__-2-__. :il 51 ' f 131llG I 30 r - -- ----=."'::!t'ljfiIl, r'- -------::.=r;....,- ,1~1'1 L-4=-________;:>"~J.... I l ----..../ r' r I ~ ~f!~:'i:! ,I '-- --_'>>M.__I I j ~'~:\\\ ~r-:r-===--"'---' __....~ , .11..... - " :8 rJ tI . ~I /! !/j~~ \ ,,,,- ------__ J " f ,,'~ "1II' : r IM33/ : -'~\ I ..c: - - -: - h -;- :,-:-,::-::.:.o::::'I",r: ~N':..':._~ iii !". ~8i! ~i!~i'f ".:t.",;-~d:~';~; -~~~f'~;;'~~~~~::t~i;" ;~::;!.'::: IS~ =11;)1 ~;~.1 i~ \ i I , '" _1 . of. Ii" G27't>tri ... ~ 1!' ~-- - otII'.....- l-L~ 11i1J1.t_ ~11" I~ ":df:-.. ,<& , ------- , : '........_'lO4 ~ I .......~~'GG"f: -'~~ i '- ....;, \ ' \ i :111 1__ _ h'1)_.....'1;,"'lt""-, -, i,;fiT'j ~'e...::... .., ~.......... I I' f: / -----~-- ; '=::h:\' I~' i ' "~-" 'i"'!'"'..... iii l.,......,.a~ \" ~ ,/ ; ,{<~i:; .:i1'j j,~,klL,!'llil~r:;~~ g;:::l~ ~ifi{;.:~:::jTj,tl! ~H ~ __u_. [~~ I .~t~~j '!:~~'~, .;~ii5J.r~1.1r >> ~t::';;-~< ',,- J J,::~::.~ .i:"iL'!(".:'.~."..'\ ~ \ i /~ i .. ~, ' ' ''!;'tE'' ~.."- - . < 1 14\' T'--~~~,,j.,...f~.1 ' I:l:~' "-,<, "-"_n_"_"_h~,,-'o ~ -e ' L . -~ U"-"e ,~_ ,'''~ ,U~, ....'=, '",)[, =,~~_~_" . . , , ,--- n 'h_h~n ___n, , -' ~,,' ;li..\n ... , -L- " ;; '" '------j,.- -----_.5 '4~V "> , - ~~ _ !!!...12L:$3, ' ''7, 'h'''_ I jj~ c . .,." -' '_~!;>,17 . b..'JIIi_,4P.5J. S89'07"OT-""__"':::J,::>',H~::!':'1... "', '8,'oi..o'); ) '~~, -,-,-,_,_,1.._, ~J'J~ V J . """,co. 159TH b7'.'ln''<4'AOl ,'N<J :: "66'?,,- N. W. _,--- - , '"1 ,,(~ '6'02" r,,' / g '" ,., -- ~ T-'!t'IM. j' .. "," \oJ '__h____, r _;;-n___n~_ d' -n--,------'-T'n'n'n_~'__nn_T-'-----""""',:<"~1' " ,':o.~n_ "'1'.' '--1--, '-"",', . (~., '~ i,'y~-:-r ! -f~: 1:-17-1: --;:':~',{ ~:P ,,-;," h_'_~ -, -,"--'-'-'--,- ~ ~: ~: CO-M-l.'Jl ~ - , 1':.3 #': i': hi :;' I' ;:. j' / """'''''<<)0, I l JO: ~., l I' 1 J: ~/: r: if : P' J1: ; J ,/ _.."...."""" /r, : ~, ;'11.., #'1' ", j" '0: 1"9: ~8:.?.1 ::1: ' : l1~ ' 'I ... fI' 1 I $'J I !j , Il 1 1.$ , i 1'1 rr I J "1 " : &;!,ft !,'1 i il --__.: /l : /1 ,1-rIO'Rt! : I. '" :: : : : . : I~ ~' : ~-__~____u_u~___ ,_m",,,-) ~ f--m..n,,~~-n-h---,1~:~~'~~~'~','~~r~'~~~'~':'~:'~~__mn'n+_n.._m__~ i I 2 '\, I ',:;; ;. \ 'JI~Ii''iI:'' ' ., /.ftj~!I':H';:X1W!i(I;i!! ":,~,:,,~;, .. ' ", ,H"1,'" " ",.,rl"~"""'" , . '."',!i,1,'",{ , ..,..', .. ".:', ':" , , ;, ';-, Rli.')I;';',<i\\(i'lii<4!~~:r ":ij;';i!i!,ihr;": :!,::'!',,!,,' '.-,""'.' "l'~ .fl ',,~ -~.':'."~~'~l't~,.<;'<'... , .".,~"I.thJi",f. ......j;'.c;.... ',.".,'" ,,', \',.,,', ,L.,." "..'Wf,I.i'i\'t ' """1'\ '.,j!',!;,;":' ", ',"....., ,',., " ,11- '~'l'!i'''- '.,"",l",;r,l'<"", "Ii",''''I>'',''','' ,,' .","'''',.. -:i:;::" . ,..: :~~i.- ", .:~,;; '.';':jJ,\liilliX .,,:;;,;,I~kh1:': ,', ,;,.no"', ..;'.; -.. Ill!l~f I }I. "p<\~. "'j*,lW_,, . ..!j;)!fi~l!-'!'f,'. ..".' 1 .:'/'!:-,l..,. ,. I ' 1l(,f '7l:A,'. ";'~C!\ii~i:!': ,'~/ l~i.\l\l':' ""i;:r~;i;L " ' "I' 'I'll" H\",ikif""". ...,l.../U'\i!. '"',,,"... <: ',! .. "', " ,';' " .";,',~",,',,:';,. , ,,'\" "" ; ."l.,:,V,::' ' '''' ""'~" ~[i' , ',', '"'...~!.",,, , \~'~'1 ' ' "" , ", I', ',.., i:": ',' ~.~ "~' ':~~: ;,;'i;j~1~~~i!t:'; ,J~~7J:~JI!;' ',,' " ,t:~iJ,J.j;L, ' ' , l'llH. . ....;IT'l!1".~_;;:(.''~:.: /1'131\',,,, .,. . i 1-' < c' "Ii' .,' '""..."",. "', ' , '.. 't, '" " '." ",.. .~. :"'\i~i 'tilt' .....ii-f;!i".:.t: .. '. ". d.. ' ';~'~',lJ.\"t:.,tl.. . .';;~~.~.;~l"~ ',. . CITY OF ANDOVER \ COUNTY OF ANOKA J STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Council member to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 99-28 FOR NAVAJO STREET NW. 173RD AVENUE NW & 175TH AVENUE NW. WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in Council Resolution No. 060-00 ,dated March 6, 2000, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law with results as follows: Bauerly Companies $111,247.75 North Valley $129,920.90 Hardrives $139,782.93 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate Bauerlv Companies as being the apparent low bidder. \ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk to , / enter into a contract with Bauerlv Companies in the amount of $111.247.75 for construction of the improvements; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until the contract has been executed and bond requirements met. MOTION seconded by Council member and adopted by the City Council at a reQular meeting this 2nd day of Mav ,2000, with Council members voting in favor of the resolution, and Council members voting against, whereupon said resolution was passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk " / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -' 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ;!: on m 0 on 0 0 0 on 0 0 0 0 ,.; N on r- " on 0 a; '" '" 0 " " N ;;: '" <D '" on on '" N N <D N <D 0 ~ ~ '" co '" ~ ~ <D '" ~ I- ~ .... ~ 0 0 on 0 on 0 on 0 on on 0 0 0 QJ I-W 0 " '" 0 on 0 0 ~ 0 ~ <D 0 <D ~ -U on ,,; a;j 0 a;j on .. ,,; N ~ N N m z- I Cll ::><1: N N '" <D ~ 3: a. ;;: 0 on 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 -' 0 N 0 0 0 a;j 0 0 0 0 0 0 a;j ;!: 0 " a on .... 0 0 on a a ~ a 0 on co a " on N .... '" a N " 0 0 '" '" N " co '" ~ <D on N ~ ~ I- .... 0 f2 on a on a a .... <D a 0 0 a 0 a 0 C:! 1;; 0 0 0 on co on a 0 '"1 a ~ " QJ I-W 0 ~ 0 0 a;j .. ,,; ,,; 0 ~ N 0 ~ ~ -U a ~ a '" ~ .... '" QJ .c z- on ~ ro 1:: ::><1: '" 0 a. 0 Z 0 '" a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a '" a ~ a a a 0 0 a 0 a a -' 0 a;j 0 ;;: 0 on 0 0 0 0 a;j 0 0 ;!: on '" " 0 .... on on '" 0 0) a ;'b N " co ~ 0 0 0 '" a " 0) co 0 " N N <D 0) on ~ ~ <D on N ~ I- .... 0 '" a a 0 on on a on on " 0 0 V> a .... N 0 a .... N 0 '" ~ 0 a QJ I-W 0 0 .. a;j m on on ,,; 0 ...; N 0 0 > ." -U on ~ '" '" ~ 0) N E z- N ~ ::><1: " '" a. I 0 a a 0 0 0 a a a 0 0 a 0 a " a on a 0 0 a a 0 a 0 0 -' 0 a;j 0 N 0 on 0 on 0 0 0 0 0 ;!: 0 '" 0 co a <D 0 .... 0 0 0 a " on '" <D .... on .... ~ on a N on <D <D 0 " ~ ~ '" co N ~ ~ <D on '" ~ I- .... 0 0 0 a 0 on 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 00 .!!! a " 0 0 on <D on on a '"1 on 0 0 (jj I-W 0 0 a;j on a;j ~ on ,,; 0 ~ N 0 0 0<1: > _U 0 co ~ co N iii~ z- on .c ::>8: " LLO 1:: 0 00 Z ~ Zz 0 QJ 0<( on a a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a a Ol / -LL -' a N a on a 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 .. ~O ;!: 0 cD 0 N 0 on 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a. 0 .... on 0 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 a <D on ;;: a a 0 .... <D 0) " 0 co on 0) ::>1': 0 ~ ~ N 0) 0 on on N ~ Cll- I- <D <cU l- V> 0 on on a a on a 0 0 on a 0 0 >-.~ a <'! N a a 0) a 0 0 <'! 0 a 0 1ii~ I-W 0 ~ on on m a;j ,,; N m ~ N on 0 _U a " N .... '" iil E z- on ::>8: ~ Cll 0 U 3: 0 a a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 0 .... a 0 a a a a a 0 a 0 0 Z -' 0 a;j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a;j ;!: 0 '" 0 on a 0 a 0 a a 0 0 .... QJ 0 '" co ~ 0 co N 0) ~ 0 co '" on ::l 0 '" N ~ 0 co ~ .... N " ~ on QJ I- ~ .c !flw a a 0 a a 0 0 0 0 on 0 a 0 iil <1:1- a .... 0 a a 0 a a on .... 0 a 0 .... W<( I-W 0 0 m 0 0 a;j a;j N a;j ...; N on a;j ~ W::; -U 0 0 ~ N " ~ oil z- a ~ z- ::><1: '" 3: -I- (')00 a. z ZW QJ W ::> ~ ;;: 0 on a 0 a 0 0 a 0 a N " Z a ~ a a 0 on 0 0 0 N '" Q) <C '" N a N N " <D 0 " ~ ::> '" ~ " ~ 'E 0 '" .... 00 '<t ~ I- 00 >- >- Z Z LL LL >- >- >- >- LL Z 01- ~ -' 00 U <1:00 l- I-- 00 -' U 00 00 U -' z ::> a; ~ OJ (jj U5 "ifi Ol ro QJ a; 0 " 0. 5 'iij' 00 ti ::; '" on -'" > ::; .c " .~ '" 'x Ol V> '" Z W W " QJ iii N 1:: t= z .~ <I: ~ ~ V> QJ <Xi 0 e E oil o e c V> > ')' -' i= C 'iij '0 0 ~.2 '3 <C '3c '" ~ '0; U 0) en a. 0 '0 o '_ ::> 0 0'0 Ui; 0) 0 0: U QJ 6j'O oCll ~ QJ c... 0. U <I: c: := W QJ "'LL E a. U 0 .- 0 ~en QJ 0 IE '0 E V> <I: ~ U 'Q' en .. ::l 0. '" .c '0 g.Jg . <I: W .. 0 - :~ 0 On bl '" c'i: a. 0 i= <I: Clll- b::u:: ~ . ::;ffi ~ N '" " on <D .... co Cl ~ ~ ~ '" w::; ~ ~ t=z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...J~ ..,. 0 0 0 <0 0 0 0 <0 <{a cD cj on cj 0; cj oj on on 1-0 ~ N '" .... ;;; a> '" N M 0:: <0 ~ ..,. N '" '" a> N ~ .... I- ..,. ~ I-wg '" 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 '" 0 '" 0 ~ -Uui ~ cj on on on ~ on I m Za::1"-- N M 0 M N <1i ~ N ::>a..N N ~ '" 3: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ;to oj cj on cj cj cj cj cj 0; I-~ '" M .... '" <0 0 <0 '" N '" <0 a> N N ~ <1i 0 '" o~ N '" ~ N ~ I- ..,. ~ ;;; 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . '" .... 0 0 0 '" 0 '" 0 ~ J-WN cD on on on N cj 0; cj -U<o M M .... N '" '" '" .r::: Z-N ~ <0 0 0 1:: ::>OC N ~ ~ 0 a.. Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a> ;to cj cj cj cj cj cj N cj N 1-0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 '" 0<0 ..,. '" ~ 0 N '" .... 0 .... '" ~ ~ <0 ~ a> I- ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a> 0 '" I-Wci cj cj cj cj cj cj 0; cj > 'C -U'" M 0 0 0 '" '" 0 'E Z-~ ..,. N '" .... 0 ::>OC N ~ .. a.. J: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 a> ;i~ N cj cj cj cj cj 0 cj cj '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 N 1-<0 M M N 0 N 0 '" N a> 0 ..,. M ~ ~ <0 a> l- N ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 en m I-Wd N cj cj cj cj cj cj cj OOC > _U<o N a> '" 0 '" 0 ~ 0 -w Z-~ ~ N '" '" N m> .r::: ::>g: ~ "-0 1:: 0 00 Z N ZZ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" '" I o<{ ...J~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... Ol f::~ cD cj cj cj oj cj cj cj ..: .. <{a a.. ~~ 1-0 .... 0 '" 0 <0 0 N '" ..,. 0.... '" ..,. '" ..,. .... M ;0 .... N N N ~ m- I- ~ <{U ~ I- '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >,,- I-Wlri cD cj cj cj N cj 0; cj ~ffi _U.... M 0 '" 0 M '" '" Z-~ N ~ N <0 .... iil E ::>g: ~ mo U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... ;tg cj cj cj cj oj cj cj cj N N 0 '" 0 <0 0 <0 0 <0 I-M M N '" 0 .... <0 a; N a> 0 N N M I- ~ Vlw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OCI- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w<{ I-Wlri cj cj cj cj N cj N cj w::;; -U.... N 0 '" 0 M 0 ~ 0 Z- ~ ~ 0 M N Z- ::>OC ~ -I- (!I en a.. ZW w ..,. <0 N .... N ..,. N 0 ~ Z. ~ ~ N '" <( <0 ::> 0 en ~:ti "- :ti :ti :ti "- :ti "- en ...J ...J ...J ...J ::> c: .J 0 <{ U l- E '" ., 0 '" en 1:: I- en 0 0 '0 .0 '" C ::;; .r::: U5 c: 5 > ai c: w U :; W 1:: .. '" U !::: zc: '" c: ::;; '" '0 '" Oe > e '" ~"E e a. ...J :; ~ '" E f:: a. a. c: .. .. .. <{ <{ U <{ I- 'iij U u: ::l 0 U en a.. .. c: 0 c;: a. a. a. '" m a. a. .r::: 0 '" E E E > o ~ 0'" U~ > a.. U U U U 0 .r::: OC '" OC I!! ",,,, 0 0 en E B ~~ ' I:: ~'" E OC w '" 10 10 '" .. <0 ::J '" a.. 0 ~ ~ OC U ~en ~ ~ m(!l OC . ::;;ffi..,. '" <0 .... '" a> 0 N N w::;;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N !:::z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...J ci ci ci <ri ci <ri ci ci ci ci ci ci ~ ... cO ~ 0 ... 0 ~ 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N 0 0 0 M 00 <0 ~ 0> 00 M <0 '" ::: <0 <0 ~ ... M <0 0> 0> N ~ <0 '" M ~ N t- O en 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 '" 0 <0 M '" 0 '" ": '" 0 t- O 0 en I-W ci ci ~ ci oj ... ... ... ci ~ N N <ri to cO 00:: ..., 0 M t- M ~ 00 M '" M ::;; _u iii~ z- 0 <0 ~ 0 ::>g: ... LLO 00 M ZZ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIl 0<( Ol ~l:'5 ...J 0 0> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 .. ~ ci to ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci 00 ci ... ci ;t a. ~~ 0 0 0 '" 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <0 0 '" 0 00 ... 00 CO N 00 a 0 ;;; '" 00 0> ... 0 ~ M ~ ... 0> ~ ~ <0 <0 ~ 03_ I- 00 <(u I- a a 0 a 00 a 0 a 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 a 0> 0 a 00 Cl 0 0 0 '" "! 0 0 0 0 (;; I-W ci ci oj ci oj to ... ci N <ri ,...: <ri oj .0 _u 0 0 ... ~ t- N N N ~ Z- '" ~ N .. ::>g: ~ 03 0 0 a a 0 a a a a 00 0 0 0 a 0 t- o 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 ...J ci cO ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci 0 ci to ci ci ~ a M 0 '" 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 t- o N 0 M 00 ... a 00 N 0> ;:;; 0 00 0> '" M M 0 M N ~ ... a 00 ~ t- N I- ~ '" qlw 0 0 a a 0 0 a a a '" a 0 a 0 a 0::1- 0 t- o a 0 0 a 0 '" t- o 0 0 0 0 W<( I-W ci ci oj ci ci cO to N cO ~ N <ri cO on ci w::;; -u a 0 ~ N ... ~ t- N Z- a ~ Z- ::>0:: M -I- elen a. ZW W ~ ;;: 0 '" a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ... <0 Z a ~ a 0 0 '" 0 a a N M ~ <( M N 0 N N ... <0 0 ... ::> M ~ ... ~ 0 en c:i~ I- en >- >- Z Z LL LL >- >- >- >- LL ~ LL Z ...J en U 0:: en f- I- en ...J u en en u ...J ...J ::> ..... Iii iD 'c Ol .!!l CIl OJ .5 .. a. ,s en ::;; .. 0< u; .c c ';: ::;: 'x Ol '" .. W W c CIl OJ N t t I- Z .~ 0:: ~ ~ '" CIl c CIl - 0 0 E u O/l o e c '" > e > ...J ~ 'iij 0 .. 0 :; a. :; <( ~ c :; '" ~ 'in oii u <( u / en a. 0 TI ::l 0 0 0 a:: u CIl om W a... a. a. a. 0:: E E E a. u 0 6 ..LL 0 !;:: u '" ~ 0:: ~ U U U en .. a. e u .g.~ 0:: W e 0 U5 0 ro ro Co a. 0 I- 0:: en O::LL ~ ~ ~ . ::;;gj ~ N M ... '" <0 t- oo 0> ~ ::: N M ~ '" w::;; ~ ~ ~ !=z a a a a a a a ;;; a a a a a a a -'0 0 0 ;t 0 0 0 0 <(0') a III '" " '" 0 1-0') '" " lD ;::: '" lD ~ co 0') ~ ~ a :: 0 0 0 a 0 0 a en 0 0 a ~ 0 '" 0 00: .., I-Wtri 0 0 ~ tri 0 0 :::;; _UlD 0 co lD N ~ '" -W Z-~ '" '" co '" m> 0 ::>g: ~ LLO 00 " ZZ 0 a 0 0 0 0 a a CD 0<( a a 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0> i=~ -' . 0 0 0 0 0 0 N '" ;!8 a. ~~ '" a lD 0 0 '" 0') 0'" '" a '" co '" 0') lD '" 0') co co m- I- :!: <(U .... a a 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 a 0 0 a '" a CD .-Wo 0 0 0 0 N 0 -e _U'" '" a " 0 ~ '" Z-N 0') '" " 0') '" ::>g: ~ m a a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a .... -'0 0 0 00 0 0 0 N ~~ '" a lD a lD 0 lD '" 0 .... lD ;;; N '" 0 N N 0') I- ~ ~ ~W 0 a a a a a a 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 W~ ....Wd 0 0 N 0 N 0 W:::;; -Uo '" 0 0') 0 ~ a Z-~ ~ 0 0') N z- ::>cr: ~ -I- "en a. Zw W ZN .... N " N a ~ ~ N co <( lD ::> a en 'tJ ~l5 l5 l5 LL Lli LL en -' -' -' :0 ::> '0 ...J c: c: .Q 0 f!: ill 'fl 0 :; E CD "" U CD en 1:: I- m en 0 0 .0 CD 0 'tJ ~ U :::;; .c: ii) c: > in :; c: W c: W U .- I- Z c: '" '" 'tJ CD U ~ - oe CD :::;; '" ~"E ii a. e '" -' i= a. l!! c: '" '" '" E :;; <( <( I- '(ij 13 U:" u U '" / en a. '" c: 0 c;: a. CD m a. a..c: 0 CD J!l E > u~ > 0 a. U 0 .c: u ~ u '" 0 c: U ~~ OCl!! co CD 0 en E u ~'" E CD cr: W 10 CD ill ~~ ~~ lD ::l CD 0 a. 0 cr: U m" cr: . . :::;;ffilD .... co '" a N N w:::;;~ ~ ~ ~ N N t:z ~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION I \ \) DATE: Mav 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion/Consent Item Scott. Eric~sordL Englneenng . ITEM NO. Award Bid/99-35/Woodland Estates 2nd Addition M. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution awarding the contract to C.W. Houle in the amount of $718,682.45 for Woodland Estates 2nd Addition, Project 99-35. Bids received are as follows: Contractor Bid Amount C.W. Houle $718,682.45 Ryan Contracting $784,998.90 Don Zappa & Sons Excavating $819,216.90 '. LaTour Construction $848,114.25 ) Northdale Construction $857,821.09 Burschville Construction $873,110.05 Barbarossa & Sons $879,516.80 SJ Louis Construction $921,134.15 SR Weidema $923,878.06 Nodland Construction $975,712.70 Engineer's Estimate $826,630.50 C.W. Houle has successfully performed other projects for the City. , / '\ CITY OF ANDOVER \ J COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 99-35 FOR WOODLAND ESTATES 2ND ADDITION. WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in Council Resolution No. 061-00, dated March 21 , 2000, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law with results as follows: C.W. Houle $718,682.45 Ryan Contracting $784,998.90 Don Zappa & Sons Excavating $819,216.90 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate C.W. Houle as being the apparent low bidder. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk , to enter into a contract with C.W. Houle in the amount of $718.682.45 for / construction of the improvements; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until the contract has been executed and bond requirements met. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a reqular meeting this 2nd day of Mav ,2000 ,with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk , / 80.38t:id C[S8 91.\? c19 [l:\?l 00. l.c ~dt:i . Engineering · Planning . Surveying , I McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Ine. . . , ,'. A~riI27, 2000 Ho~orable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Andover 1685 Crossto'Ml Boulevard Northwest Andover, Minnesota 55304-2612 SUBJECT: City of Andover Woodland Estates Second Addition Utility and Street hnprovements - City Project No. 99-35 MFRA #12746 , Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: On Tuesday, April 25, 2000, bids were received and opened for Utility and Street Improvements on Woodland Estates Second Addition. A total often bids were received, ranging from $718,682.45 to $975,712.70. The bid tabulation is attached. The engineer's estimate is $826,630.50. The low bid is thirteen percent under the engineer's estimate. The following tabulation is the bidders and their bids. 1. C.W. Houle $ 718,682.45 2. Ryan Contracting Company $ 784,998.90 3. Don Zappa & Sons Excavating $ 819,216.90 4. LaTour Construction, Inc. $ 848,114.25 5. Northdale Construction $ 857,821.09 6. Burschville Construction, Inc. $ 873,110.05 7. Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. $ 879,516.80 8. SJ. Louis Construction, Inc. $ 921,134.15 9. S. R. Weidema, Inc. $ 923,878.06 10. Nodland Construction Co., Inc. $ 975,712.70 15050 23rd Avenue North . Plymouth. Minnesota . 55447 phone 753/476-5010 . fax 763/476-8532 e-mail: mfra@mfra.com LIZ 'd EDgE 'ON SOO~ ]NV~~ sawoJJw Wd6S:j OOOZ'LG'ldV 60'3!J~d C~S8 9.!.v c19 ~1:v1 00. .!.C ~d~ Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council April 27, 2000 ) Page 2 Based on their satisfactory performance on similar projects and the merit of their low bid, it is our recommendation the conn:act for this project be awarded to C. W. Houle, Inc. :V,ery truly yours, MFRA I R. Jeff Elliott, P.E. .' RlE:pry Enclosure s:lrnain:\And 12746:ICotTCSpondcncelmay0r4-26 - J , L/r 'd r09r 'oN SOO~ ~NY~d sawoJJw ~~dOO:G OOOG 'LG '1 dy 0l: . 38tld C:~S8 91.t> C:19 ~1 : 171 00. 1.C: Cldtl O"'IlOl-.-lC7\""'..D.....~_ ~~~~w....~w~~~~~~~~~N~_______ --~~~C7\~~....N_~ ~\AS: -~~~.~N-O~ ~ ~ _ ~~~~~AWN-Q _ ... <:0-" ~~ s::~~ oo~o....--~~.----------..__.____...~_~~~ 0'" j ... ~:?:~o~~o~o;~ 6 c:"" ~ "-i-~.3:l::."";.. r C: ~; . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.. ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ..;.; .,;.;..; .,; ..;.,;.,; ..; ..; g. . :J6 ", ~ E-i:-...2:;.o;<: ;! ~~~s~~a~::~~~'~~~~~~~~~~~~~<<<<<<<<<<<~~ --> r- K' ::~to~~~nn~ r- O~St~~ti'f. .~~gnnnnnnnnnn~~~~~~~~~~~~~~fi :!::< '" '" a i'''~:;H~~Hi m ~~~~~~--9~~~i>>>>>>~~~~~s~~~~~ceoo o!~ zi.'l ClfEI~;!3.",~~", ~ ~~~~ Q~~~~~~~~~~~3~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ZZ 15 0 ~~!~<'~-~~~~~-' <<~<~~N~~NN~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ "'c: :>.: .0 <r~~:e~z z ~'~~!;~~~;~3t!>>~>~>P~~~,~l~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ N -6-1 -r: -<... - ~ , - 8 ~ <i E - ';i I! - - Cl !2 !2 Cl g ~ ~ ~ .. '" OJ ~ ... ." ." ," " ," ," ," " " _ ... oz ..~ -::O<OCl!i~S g. n~l)1:I ut "!'S880 ,,~.G':; ~ .~~~;;;;:_Q:::_~ ;:; "lO U1 Q a ... ... _ !:S - 0_ ..::::.c. <2._--..Q~..QIiOOOO:.. -._~--"! &II >'" ... j lili; 5'. ~ ~[~~ ~~~~~~~ .. "'-; 3 - < < 3' ;::' ",- g" ~~ ~~ ~~~u~~ ..- .. ; ~ ~"!:~~Qil! ... I r I ~ ~ N" .. ,~~~~.~ _~~~~C~~~ ~:~~__NA~~~~~_~~W; :j "":;:;- --~c;t -< \QgQANW",",V'lOv- ~~~g8~~NWNAOOO~~~.~""'_O~~OOOOO~~~~~__~~_ I- ~!;;;~~~~!;;!;;S;; ~~~t~~~~~;~~~~~;~~;~~~;~~~~;~~~~~~~~~~ c ::j 1-", ~a - - ;: ::jZ ~.....~~~g::;C;:: 8~ -- ~oo~~~~~~~~egE~~A8:~~W~N~N-~~__~ ~iil " PP:-~~~?~~l-"'?~~l-"P'..,. ~~" . ~, ~" ~_ :-:-O~. ~P', ~;;; 8888888isgg ggdgSg8888888ggggggggggggggggggggggggg 00 .. ilootW_........_......_ .. ~~~~~~~~-~~-~~..____~_~__~_M"_~~~____~_ I-!;l ;56 ... "'-i ~ a> ...'" QO w Sol go..", - - - - ~ '" NNNO~~~ -W~~QQ=~. .~~= __.;.~W =~~N~ ...,..,,'00..0 0 _....,~c..~ 0...... ~ ~ ':-,' .~~a ".0"0':-'0 _t,.."c-. ~t~8~t~~~bN~b~~a~~~N~~Q~~A~~N~~~N~N~~~ ~ ?~;Si5~~~~~~ P , ~~~;Q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. ~~~~=~~~~~. ~ 8888888~gg 0 88S88888888g88ggggggggg~gg8ggg8~888888 Q c % ~~ .;~~.~f~t~u~~~ y ~ ~~N________~ ::i ob ~~~~___ .. '" .....01_ 00'............'" SPPO~~~Q~~~""~~" ~~~~p~~~;~$. ~p~~~~~~pp~ -" g~e8888i:e~~ gg~~ggg~gg8888ggS88ege~ggggggggga88g8a ~'" -. .. ..,iII..................."" ~ """"~~~~~~..,~~~........~~~~~~~"~~"~""...M...~..,~~ :t 0 C ~ - - -"-I N N_w =~~ -~~~._.~r ~AO= -~N~~'" OI....~__ clF.; ... .~ ~O'I.o\OO_.....,I..t..,..... -.. > ~~.~~g~~~~e i:: a~~_s~~~~e~~~~:w~~~~g~at~~2~~~~~~2~~~~ r- " QQAOOOAC~N~~gSo~:8$ O~Oggg?O.....g~~N~QQO '" 8888888t;:8~ '" gg~~88888g8~gggggggg~ggggggggg~8gg8888 " Q I- 2 ... ... =1,. - '&.............. ~ ~.~oo..8..~~..,.~ ....AAA~WWY~________~ ..-< - "'.0\0___ ~80o~~..,.~..,.gO~Q.-""._OO~~._~N~~~0.~~W"'N"''''Q 2'" oo..Ol;lQQ"""~A_ "z g~~g88g~8~ 8gte~~g~gg888SS88~88!~gg$g~tg~~~~~~~~g '"8 ~ ""'"""(I'I""'''''~''''''''", .. ......~~"~~~""~~..,""M~~~~.....____~~____~~...__~_"'" I-:!j ....~ ~ ~ SB ...,c:;;.~_~~~~... ;: WNN O....N N~~=Q~~r .~~~ _~;""'YN ~"".N~ 'ilI ~.~ ~~~.~~ ~~ ~ >z ~ i~~-~~~~S~~~~~~~~~~t~e~~~s~~~~~;e~~~~~ r-c '" <; is888888tg8 '" oc~gb88~888~ggoobooOOoocbQb8O~~~~~~N~8 " OOOQO 0 ggggeOQQOOQOO 000000000 ~ 0 0 (')~S2 =ir"">n -<~Z~ "':;7:""0< :=6i:lil~ "':'l:-~~> , ~5~~5 -~2"'o ~uf1~~ ~V'I-; Lit 'd E09E 'oN SOO~ ~NY~j SHIW:J:Jli l~dOO:Z OOOZ 'LZ 'ldy n"38t:ld C:~S8 9.!.17 c:t9 17t:17t 00. a ~dt:l ;:::o:.~.;::;::=g.oOll""""VI"WN-~ ~~~~~;~~~~~N=O~~~~~~WN- ~ ~=~ ~ -(0 or: '" ~~S; -?: ~~~ ~~~=~~~~~ ~~ l 0'" a ~ .... =~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <::;):i ~~~lo~.~O~"~~Q~c~~ Q :;:0 ;! ~~; "l;lgis1! Q.3~,;33~ ~ ~~~~2o~~'~'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~lr~~i~ ~'~~~~;~i ~ :-> ... ... ~i~~i~~i~~~~~~~QQQQQQQQ ~< '" '" 'P>~ _;Ie ~"'Af ,,~' ~ '" ~ ~~i.iiiF..~".nnnnnnnn~ 0 '" ~l~~ ~~i ~x~ ~~C~. B z~ g ~ =~ r~p .~~ ~~~E ~ "~.iO~~~~~~i~i..F.iFF- zZ ... Jr" ~ ;'9' - >ot!l S' g! a. n ~ 0 o 0 ,., , .... .... ... ... \00 .. ... ... lot me 0 ~ ~~ . a 8~. o~~~ ~. -~.O~~Smmm~mmA~AW~W~~ :z ~[{~.... Ull~ . _="'tI= _. <: ~ =-~~ ~~ai~~~a~~~~~~~~ CIl~ A _::1_ ~l'lltc- 0 ... ~ ~~ ~~~~~~>~~oo~o~~o~~ =:n5 ~~ ~ ~ ~gQi~~ ~ ~~~~sl~a~aaaa~~_E__~_ 2 .. S! ~ ~. ~ ~ :lst~DKilr~(rrrr~rrrr >;<:l , c:a..... ... "" ~ R co ",-' ~~ - ~...~ ~ ~ e ~~~~~~..~...~~~~..~ "':I: ... '" ;' . ~ ~. ~. -^~~~~~,,,,......~.........~ ... , . 2 ~~~~ :;~7::,~:r ... , ~ ~ ~ "'0 $' !~~;.n (- CD iT or OTO.OJ" ~ S'~~t~~ 'I aa.ao.z.a " S; Z -I f~~~ w~~o ~~~~~~. ~ adN _ ~~~e~~~~ -< ~88_~8~88~~~8~~~8 =~Q&-N-~~-~~N--~O~~_~N_ ~~~;~~~~Q~~~~~~~QQ Q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ c =< em zZ _...___r.__ _ -Q . . . . . - . - - ~z N~~~86w4Q~8~~~~~n~ ~ ~~~~~~E~~~R~X~_~~.~~__ ~ ~ ~m ~~~~?~~~OOO~o~oo,~~woo~p g::;, g~ggggg9SgSS82~~SS gSgSS8SSeeeeegSSS8588SS 00 '" S6 .. .. ~~MM"~M~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~M~~M~~M~~~~M_~~~~~~~ !< "'-i ~ <>> ....> 0,., ~ fi 0.... -. ~ ~ - ~ ~ -1m ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ bbbt~~~~~~~Cb~~~b~~~t~C > ~ ~~8~o~88888~~8~~~~ Q gggg88888888888~8~~~8~~ r- 0 '" ~P. . gPP~PPP~~~~~~~ 0 :s '" ~g~gggg888888gg888 8 828S8888888€ggggggggggg Q 'i -.-- ::; -- ~ 't..o'Oo"..o1... o()~~ 011....... 0\ 0. ." ~~~~~~~~9~?~~~~~~~ :_o88~a~8oo~ad8e~~~~~;= ,., n~ ~~~~ggo~g~g~~~~~8d ~~8888888888..8..~~~~~8 "'': " ~ M ~~~~"M~M""~~~~~~~~ '" ~M~M~~M~~M~__~~___~__~_ " 0 c ~ N ...... - 0 ~. '" u _ N _ N Sl'" '" w _ N~A_~~~__ N ~ ~~~~~~r~~r ~r~~~~~~ g ~ !~~~~We~8~~~~~e&8~ '2 S~8~88S88~tS~~8e~~~$~~~ > ... ~ ~ . ~.. ~P~P~~~~?~~?? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~. ...~. . . :.. ~~ggg~g~gg8~o8!g88 is ~ ~ 8g88888ggggggggg8doOd~g 'i _N_____ ::;,., v_ ~ t_~~g~~~~~a~~88e~~~~~~~ .,,-c ~~__8~N.~~~~~~~~NN "'~ ~8~~g88g8~gg~~~g8g 8~88888888888888888.888 "n "'0 .. .. ~~~M~~~~_~~.MM~~M~ .. ~~~~~~~~~~M~~w~~~~~~~~~ :z: .; " u ...> ~ ~... u gg 1: .. ~ -~N~~~6_~_r ~_~Q~.~_ N ............, __N.Dr._~O\"_ !!" '~ '-' ~~~~~~g~~~~~Y~-8~~ ~~oo_~~~~~~~_~~~_.~~~~. >% .. v ;~~~~~. . 8~~~~~~~?~ ~~8~888~8~~88S8~8~~~~~~ "'0 v :8 i!! ~gggg8g88888~88888 8 8888€8gg€SSgggggggggggg :<: 0 eO n"'o ::ji">!J -<"'2:... , .,:-10-< ::6~Bto ~"- ~"=1 ",' , > > >Z-'-iZ 2:06'-'0 -~_r.no ~..:Im~< A~~ ~ 0\"'" '0;:1;1 LIS 'd E09E 'ON SOO~ ~NYH~ SBViO:J:J11 l~dOO: 2 0002 'L2 'J dy C:~ " 38t:ld C:~S8 9.!.17 c:t9 17t : 17t 00, .!.C: ~dt:l _~m~~~.~N_~ ~W~~~YWW~N~~~NN~~N~__________~~~~_.~~_. ~~7 o (IIIt...,Qt.""""~N-OIQ"""CI'VIo""""""_o..oC:Q"",o"".l..,r.#_g _ r-Q~ ;;:i -<lA~ -~ ::0> ~ z 0 ~ ~ ~:~~o~~o~~~ ~ ~~~a~~~~oo~~~~~~o-ooooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ c~ S .~-~"~:;oo.oo' S ;:-SO:O~l'At.')~<..)(c:c-_:-:'~"..."cC'~"''''~'''I)."",~'''V",~",g.' :jo > ~~c=~_~o--~ ~ -~~~""~~M~.UZ'~~~~~~"'''''''V~___<'<<<<<<<<<_ _> r r~~~~~"~~~~~ ~ ~~i~~~i~~~~~5~~~n~~~~~~~;;~~~~~~~~~n~~! ~< ~ ~.~~~~~~~F~ ~ ~~~i~t.')-!~~~l~~>>>>>~~~~E~~cccco~cc~~ol~ 2~ Q ~~~'~~I~'n~~ Q ~~a-li~~~~N~~!!!~~!~~~i~~~:~~:~:~~:~~ ~ ZZ B ~_~.i-;l~MWI B QW~.~g-e'...I<<~<:~<~M~~M~~..._..~____ <: ~~ z a~ I<i~~~!z ~ ~.l~i~2~~U~~t~>>>>>>~~F~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~. w .. ~ _ "" - ~ ., ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " - - 'S n n" Q Q ~ ~ Cl iJ c: " ~ .. " ., .., ':' ';l ," " " " " " " _ '" q 2:0 ""-g 1Q"'(')C)1oo~ _ ':cftrlo &.;\11 .-88 Q..., ,",4,_ N1...,.....-__ __ 10 ~ ..., ~ Qa;ig!.~ g" ~e.;:!~ ~?_Q..99~Q~~ ~~QO!~~~~~~- >:;;Q ~ ~ <<;.~~. ~~~~ ~~=~~~~ ~~ g' ~~ e_ ~~~i:~~ t ., ro _ _ _ _ ~ _ -..I j, ~ ;r c: > :< -< ~~ ~~ ~-A ~ --~NN _~ ~a~~_ ~~W_ ~ -80- _~tlQQ ~Ng~e~ -~~~~w~~_ ~~_~__~.~~~_~_g~~~ ~ gANW~~O~ N~AQgg~~WN.~O~~~~~~_g~~OOOCO~~~~~___~_ ~ ~~~>~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;o~~~~~o~o~~~ ~ ~ . . . ,.. :;8 ~ ~~~~N__ d~ - A -~W ~=~~_a~&~~~~ ~~.y NNN___8 ~Z ~~~??~~~~~ ??~~~~~P~~~~~~~b~~~~~~~~~~~b~~E~~h~~~P ~N 88088g8€~g 88~28888gggggggo88888g8g88gg0gogQO~~88 ~~ f8 1-" -0 M ~~~~~~~~.M ~ ~~~~~M~~~~MMMM~~~~~~~~~W_~~.~M~M~M~M~~ > ~~ ~ cs> ~ 0 C' u ;l Z ~ - - -~ - _~___N_ __ _N_ _ ~~ ~. ~~~_N_~_~~ N _NW ~~w ~~~W""~N~ .~~~ _....~~_~. O~~N. >_ ~ .~~~~~~~~~~ u gob ~a~_~.Q.~~~~~e~~~~~~~~~~.~~~w~~~~g .% - :o~~8~~~~~ ~ o~~o~sa~~~~~QQgpcAo~8~~88Egg~~~e~~~~AQ ~ 8 888888gggg S 88a88888ggggg88888888888g8gggg~888~888 e - ~l:' - :"'.o...a.. - "N ~ ?8 ~d ~ ~~~A___ .~ ~~U~A...a~~~~....A..~~~A~YWW~~~YY~ ~c g~-COC~~~. Q~O~~~~~Q~~_O~~~~~~~.~~~~W._~~_WN~~p~C ~ 8ge8888~s~ 8~~!~~888g8ggggggg~88~~8g8S~~~~8gg~g~~ mg - M~~~~~~~~~ "M~~~~~~~~-~~"M~~~~~~W~~~M_~~~~~~MMM~M~ ~~ ~ ....'" ~ - ~ -~ ~ - -. --- -- -~- --- - S~ ~ ~~~- b~t~~~ ~ N~~ ~b~~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~t_~b~e~~~~A~C~~P >~ ~ ~~~~~p~~~~ ~ ~?;~~;~~~~;~~~~~~~~~~~~p~~~~~~~~~~;~~! ~~ g 88!8888~8~ g ~888o~8g88gag88888888~~g8gggo~c88888~8 l- i! . . ~ ~~ ~ ::e~__ ~c =~~=~o~...a...a~...a~~~~~~WWWNN~~N~N~N~~8 ~~ ~~-~~~~~~C A_OQ~~W~~OOW~~~~~~~~~W~~~~~~~~~~~~?~~O_~ ~~~~a~~~~~ ~b~~~~~~~~e~:~=~=~3~~~~stseeessee~~~~8 ~6 1-,. - -~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~""~~~~~~~M_M_~~M~~~~~~~~~M~_~~~M~~~~~ ~ " - u -I a ~ - ~ -~ - _N _N_ _N - -- - s~ t ~~~~~t~~~~ ~ ~~e ~e~~~~c~~~~~~~w~~~~w~~~Et~~~~~~~t? ~~ ~ ~~~~:~~8~S ~ ~~~o~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~~e~~!;~~~ . ~ ~ ~gg~~~g~~~ ~ ~;28~~~~~~c~s~~~~=~~~~~€gg~~~~~~~S~~Cg ,.. o cO n~a =<i'">Q -<Gf.lZ~ ...:-'0-< ' ~~?~a ...:a.o_cn_ -n--o""'i).: S;Z=-:':;2 =:psmc N~-~O ~~~~~ ~Vl-;O;g ~/9 'd E09E 'ON SOO~ ~NY~~ SaWOJJW WdlO:G OOOG '~G 'Jdy ~t " 38t:ld C:~S8 9.!.17 c:t9 17t :17t 00. LZ ~dt:l . .. --------~~~~~~~N_~ NN~~__________~.~~~~~N_ ~_~ ,; C18.... Q<t.l..o'I" ""N_O ~ ...,""_O"O....,O\........""''''''_Q _ r-v... ... -I 00(0"';'1 \ ~ I'1l :: tJo ::0 '" :l: 0 > J tIO Z 0 N g ~ -I ~~~-~~~~~~r~in~~~~. ~ -~m.~....WNN___WNNN____ ::j~ ~ 0 0 ...l:l:r-.'........_.O'~l .. I!''''E~O' 0 ::"-.... -.. .. -O~-........NoO...__..~......... """ ;r ~-."'~<~2'".i!~ ~ Dl-3 =>' =-:;;:'ao~~occ.:lI:I:I;;;::::I_.... 0 ti ""i -I :i :E no ~ - a; _. Q "'. 9 ~ -l 0.. ~ .;;; 0 ti";;;,";;;,'" " " " :21 " '" " " ~ " " " := :: ~ ~ ~ D~~l~~i~~ ~~~<~n~~~~ ~ ~~~.~~~33;nnnnnnnnnnnn~nO ~> ~~ ~~~o _ >e~~_~ .~n ;_"^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .< ~ = ~.'~ i.~ ~~:~~~~r' ~ ~ g~~~iji~it~~~iQQQQQQQQ~. ~~ - 0 ~ ~~m~ ~~Q ;~~~Gw~~ ~ ~ q~-<<~n~~~&~a~~~aa;;~e~ ZZ f 6 ~f~~ ~l~ ~lal;~~~~ a ~ ~~Qa~~~mm~j~~.~....,~~;~~ ~~ ~ Z ~~[ft ~~. _09 c~ _~ Z _ _J^~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~< ~ ::: .. ~~ 8):: ~Z.DS'!i" g .; ~ Q;;~~:'....aS:7~~~~k'~ga~gg-oc ~z c ~.. ..~w i!.' ^_.=-~.QllaI6~.~...~~ >Q ~ .~ 0 ~~- ~ ~:~~~n2ss~~~8.~~~0~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~65 c ~- ~~Mn~~~~_~~n"~~p~~ ~ . ~I ~ ~~~ i ~O~~;!Gg~~~;~~:~~~~~! ~~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ------- ~ ~ ~ ~~n_ ~~~i~~ ~ ,,- "it s' :;:;:...;iU n ~~~~~~ . ~ ~~iriD , . ~~~a.~E I c::.C1.Q. Q.Q. f- kl c: !< ... t-.t _.......... ~ _ _ :;; ~~~8 ~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~ _ ~Ae~~~~ ~ .~QQ-~oco~~~o8ooo8 QgO.-N-~W_WWW__~O~~_~N~ ~~~~~~~~Q~~~~~~~QQ Q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~ ~ f- e: ;:;" -------- ~o ~~ ~ ~ ~ w~~~~bm~~~~~~UW~W~N__ ~z ~_W_~ONN_NONO~~~wN o-oo8~88888~o88~~~~PN~~ ~N ~8~~88S88~8g~g~gg8 8~8888g8gggg8g8ggggg888 g~ ~~ / f-~ ~o M ~ ~~~~~~~-.~.~~M"~~~ M -~~-~~-~~~~~~"""~~M~~~~ > ~~ ~ ~> S;g go ~ ~ z - 0 00... ..... _ ...._ _ .:n ~ ~ ~ ~w ~~~~~~~ p ~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~9~~~~ >_ N ~ ~~~~-~~. ~~""'~-~~~8~~ ~ t~a~~~-oA_o~ua~~~~~N~~_. "'7- ~ = ~~o8~808888~~8~~~Q ob8g8~88888~888~~~~~5~ti ~ ~ ~ ~8888888gggg~8gg8~ 8 888888gggggg88g88888a~8 - c: z... ~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ A~oe~~~o~=-~~~ ~N N~_ ~o ~~~~~?~~~~~~~:~~~~ ~=?~~?~~?~~~~~~~!e~~~e~ ~~ ~ooa88~Qg~8Q~oc~Q~ 80888888g88gQg~QQO~OCCO ~B ~ "~~~~~~~~~~W~~~~"~~ ~ ~~~W~W__~_~~~~M~~"M~"~~ % ::j ...." !: N o&~",. 0: _ 1..1_ ~ 0'= ~ N ~~, ~t~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~ . i ~=~g~8e~8~g~~8~~g~ .... g88a88~g~8~~g~~2~=a~5~o ~6 ~ ~ ~~888888g8g~~8gg88 ~ 88888gee88g88~888~~~~88 7- c:Z ~~ -.~--- ~= ~~ - ~ w ",. ~~~~~2~~~~~~~ ~ NN~ ~o ~---~.~~O~~NQ~~~Ow ~NON~~~OO~~Q.t~~~~~t~gg ~> ~~~~8~~88~~88~2~Sg g~8~~~~~~~~~~t~~~2e~~~= ~~ w - _~~"M~~M__~~_~~~~~ M M~~~~~~~~~_~~_~~~~~"~~~ 8 z ~ ~ ~~ ~ 0 ~ ~ - ~~.-~~~~ _ ~ ~__&.~=.. ~__ ~_~~~~~_ s~ . " - . . b.. 'b.' 10:1 ~ ~. ~ .. - . . . . . ... ~-. - - . . . . . .. 11- ~ ~ e~~~~~~~8~288~~~~8 ~ ~~8~~~e~~~~~:t~~S~t:~g: ~ ~ ~ ~~8888888g~g~g~g~8 t 888!:t~:~~e~~~~~a~~a~~~ - ~ <: o CO n-lg :!"'">i:l <~Z=i ""~o< ~En:!!l~ ~:-:'l' . > ~z..,~z , ~P6mo -..::I_~C !j\Q~2< .t:o.~no~ 0\Vt.-i :N U~ 'd rOgr 'oN SOOH ~NYHd SgIWJJI~ l~dl0:Z OOOZ n 'Jdy ~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \ ) DATE: Mav 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEP~tTMENT Non-Discussion/Consent Item Scott Erickson, Engineering ITEM NO. Order Plans & Specs/00-22/Misc" Concrete Curb & Gutter 84, The City Council is requested to approve the resolution ordering improvement and directing preparation of plans and specifications for Project 00-22, Miscellaneous Concrete Curb & Gutter. This project will be to replace various sections of concrete curb and gutter throughout the City" The funding will be from the Street Department Maintenance budget. J \ / "\ ) CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 00-22 FOR MISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER. WHEREAS, the City Council is cognizant of the need for miscellaneous concrete curb and gutter; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council to order the improvement of Miscellaneous Concrete Curb & Gutter, Project 00-22; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the City I Enqineer to prepare the plans and specifications for such improvement project. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a reqular meeting this 2nd day of Mav , 2000 , with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk I ~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION \ ) DATE May 2,2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Item Scott Erickson~t Engineering ITEM NO. Reject Bids/98-29/Grey Oaks J5. The City Council is requested to approve the resolution rejecting bids for Project 98-29, Grey Oaks. Bids were previously received last fall (1999) for this project anticipating a bid would be able to be awarded. With the current status of this project, it is recommended to reject the bids at this time. / I "\ / CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION REJECTING BIDS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. - 98-29 FOR GREY OAKS. WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in Council Resolution No. 188-99 , dated Auqust 17 , 1999, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby reject the bids. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a reqular meeting this 2nd day of Mav ,2000 ,with " Councilmembers voting in favor / of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk j ~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION " ) DATE: May 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion/Consent Item Scott Erickson,f Engineering ITEM NO. Award Bid/99-36/Sunridge a&;, The City Council is requested to approve the resolution awarding the contract to Volk Sewer & Water in the amount of $190,422.31 for Sunridge, Project 99-36. Bids received are as follows: Contractor Bid Amount . Volk Sewer & Water $190,422.31 Old is Gold Construction $192,161.60 Inland Utility $195,894.40 " Widmer Inc. $207,916.05 ) Dave Perkins Contracting $210,810.50 Burschville Construction $212,037.50 Redstone Construction $214,016.51 Kuechle Underground $246,955.00 Dick's Excavating & Concrete $256,619.10 Don Zappa & Sons Excavating $261,418.00 Northdale Construction $265,803.99 Engineer's Estimate $249,400.00 Volk Sewer & Water has successfully performed other projects for the City. " / '\ CITY OF ANDOVER J COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 99-36 FOR SUNRIDGE. WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in Council Resolution No. 074-00, dated April 4 , 2000, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law with results as follows: Volk Sewer & Water $190,422.31 Old is Gold Construction $192,161.60 Inland Utility $195,894.40 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate Volk Sewer & Water as being the apparent low bidder. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk '\ to enter into a contract with Volk Sewer & Water . . in the amount I of $190,422.31 for construction of the improvements; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until the contract has been executed and bond requirements met. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council at a reaular meeting this 2nd day of Mav ,2000 ,with Councilmembers voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk '\ / BIDS RECEIVED Friday, April 28, 2000 @ 10:00 AM Client City of Andover Sunridge Street and Utility Project Improvements SEH File No. A-ANDOVOOO1.01 Bidder Name Base Bid 5% , Barbarossa & Sons Bauerly Companies Burschville Construction W .$ U1.-( O-S:j.5D / Dave Perkins ContractinQ (9 AI: 'Z,10( '610,50 / I / i Don Zappa & Sons Excavating @ $; 11:,1 ( 4le,.OO Inland Utility Construction \?) -tJ: 1~51 <6C14-.40 /' Kober Excavating Kuechle Underground @ $" 1-.-4b( c155. CO / Landwehr Construction Minnesota Pipe Motzko Companies North Valley Inc Northdale Construction @ $ U>~ ~s.. c1"l ./ Old is Gold Construction ~ 1 1~1.., lbl . {,D ./ RP Utilities - , Redstone Construction g $ &14-, Ofb. 51 / Ryan Contracting SR Weidema Volk Sewer & Water cD $ t qo, 4'l1.-."3.:.l y/ WB Miller / Widmer Inc <J' ~ 1-o~1 cUb. OS \cpu42\corp\doclmisc'corpservlfonnslbdsrcvd,bb,doc.l.doc \$ \)\ ~c)S 0/..t.N f\'\It..J\) ~ W<J G'M.r1' \!. ~ t.-Sb, blCJ. 10 ./ ~--- --~----~-- ~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '\ I DATE Mav 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion/Consent Item Scott Ericksond)L Engineering . ITEM NO. Approve Resolution for Establishing Compliance with Reimbursement Bonds/99-35 (Woodland Estates 2nd Addn.), m,-28 (Navajo St., 173rd Ave. & 175th Ave.) & 99-36 (Sunridge) The City Council is requested to approve the resolution establishing compliance with reimbursement bond regulations under the internal revenue code. The resolution relates to the City bonding for public improvement projects. This is a new resolution and procedure we are required to implement for all bonded improvement projects. , J , / "\ CITY OF ANDOVER ) COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Councilmember to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION RELATING TO FINANCING OF CERTAIN PROPOSED PROJECTS TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE CITY OF ANDOVER ESTABLISHING COMPLIANCE WITH REIMBURSEMENT BOND REGULATIONS UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE. WHEREAS, the Internal Revenue Service has issued Section 1.103-18 of the Income Tax Regulations (the "Regulations") dealing with the issuance of bonds, all or a portion of the proceeds of which are to be used to reimburse the City for project expenditures made by the City prior to the time of the issuance of the bonds; and WHEREAS, the Regulations generally require that the City make a prior declaration of its official intent to reimburse itself for such prior expenditures out of the proceeds of a subsequently issued borrowing, that the borrowing occur and the reimbursement allocation be made from the proceeds of such borrowing within one year of the payment of the expenditure or, if longer, within one year of the date the project is placed in service, and that the expenditure be a capital expenditure; and WHEREAS, the City desires to comply with requirements of the Regulations with respect to ", certain projects hereinafter identified; / NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Andover, Minnesota adopt a "declaration of official intent" pursuant to Section 1.103-18 of the Regulations. 1. Official Intent Declaration (a) The City proposes to undertake the following projects described on Exhibit A attached hereto. (b) Other than (i) expenditures to be paid or reimbursed from sources other than a borrowing or (ii) expenditures permitted to be reimbursed pursuant to the transition provision of Section 1.103-18(1)(2) of the Regulations or (iii) expenditures constituting preliminary expenditures as defined in Section 1.103(1 )(2) of the Regulations, no expenditures for the foregoing projects as identified on Exhibit A have heretofore been made by the City and no expenditures will be made by the City until after the date of this Resolution. (c) The City reasonably expects to reimburse the City expenditures made for costs of designated projects out of the proceeds of debt (the "Bonds") to be incurred by the City after the date of payment of all or a portion of the costs. All reimbursed expenditures shall be capital expenditures as defined in Section 1.150-1 (h) of the Regulations. (d) This declaration is a declaration of official intent adopted pursuant to Section 1.103-18 of the Regulations. / 2. BudQetarv Matters. As of the date hereof, there are no City funds reserved, allocated on a long-term basis or otherwise, set aside (or reasonably expected to be reserved, allocated on a long-term bases or otherwise set aside) to provide permanent financing for the expenditures related to the projects, other than pursuant to the issuance of the Bonds. This resolution, "\ therefore, is determined to be consistent with the City's budgetary and financial } circumstances as they exist or are reasonably foreseeable on the date hereof, all within the meaning and content of the Regulations. 3. FilinQ. This resolution shall be filed within 30 days of its adoption in the publicly available official books and records of the City. This resolution shall be available for inspection at the office of the City Clerk at the City Hall (which is the main administrative office of the City) during normal business hours of the City on every business day until the date of issuance of the Bonds. 4. Reimbursement Allocations. The City's financial officer shall be responsible for making the "reimbursement allocations" described in the Regulations, being generally the transfer of the appropriate amount of proceeds of the Bonds to reimburse the source of temporary financing used by the City to make payment of the prior costs of the projects. Each allocation shall be evidenced by an entry on the official books and records of the City maintained for the Bonds, shall specifically identify the actual prior expenditure being reimbursed or, in the case reimbursement of a fund or account in accordance with Section 1.103-18, the fund or account from which the expenditure was paid, and shall be effective to relieve the proceeds of the Bonds from any restriction under the bond resolution or other relevant legal documents for the Bonds, and under any applicable state statute, which would apply to the unspent proceeds of the Bonds. MOTION seconded by Councilmember and adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 2nd day of Mav ,2000 . with Councilmembers_ / , voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers voting against, whereupon said resolution was passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J. E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk " EXHIBIT A , Project Descriptions: Woodland Estates 2nd Addition, Project 99-35 Navajo Street NW, 173'd Avenue NW & 175th Avenue NW, Project 99-28 Sunridge, Project 99-36 Estimated Cost to be Reimbursed from Bond Proceeds: - / ) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION , , DATE: May 02. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-discussion Finance Jim Dickinson ITEM NO. 1r.ove Joint Powers Agreement for Information Systems Coordinator Request: The City Council is requested to approve the attached "Joint Powers Agreement Between the Cities of Andover and Elk River for the position of Information Services Coordinator". Background: At the March 21, 2000 City Council meeting the Council authorized staff to negotiate a contract with the City of Elk River to partner in the hiring of an Information Services Coordinator. The attached joint powers agreement and position description are the result of those negotiations. Also attached are the minutes of the March 21 st meeting and agenda write-up. If there are any questions related to the request please do not hesitate in contacting me. / '\ JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF ) ANDOVER AND ELK RIVER FOR THE POSITION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS COORDINATOR WHEREAS, the cities of Andover and Elk River through their repective governing bodies are interested in hiring an IS coordinator to perform shared duties between each city; and WHEREAS, there is a cost savings to share a full-time employee to coordinate computer services. NOW, THEREFORE, the cities of Andover and Elk River, for valuable consideration, hereby agree to participate in the hiring of an IS coordinator according to the following terms: 1. Fmplnying Mllni~ip:'llity. The city of Andover hereby agrees to be the employing municipality and will conduct all job reviews ofthe employee. The city of Elk River shall be involved in initial interviews and job reviews of such employee. All final personnel decisions would be made by the city of Andover. 2. Tim~ A lln~Mirm, Each city will be entitled to a set number of hours worked by the IS coordinator. The city of Andover will be entitled to 24 hours per week, and the city of Elk River 16 hours per week. The hours may be changed only if mutually agreed by both cities. Vacation, holiday and sick leave would be shared on a pro- ) rata basis between both cities. Training time that is mutually agreed upon between the two cities would be shared between the two cities. Training time that is not mutually agreed upon by both cities will be credited against the time allotment for that city requesting such training. No special projects needing more than the city's allotted time will be allowed without the written consent of the other city. If one city is given permission to use more that its allotted employment time of the IS coordinator, it shall pay such additional costs as are agreed in writing before such additional work is commenced. 3. A lln~:'Itinn nf rn~t~. The city of Andover shall bill the city of Elk River monthly for its pro-rata share of the costs of this approved position and its related budget including but not limited to PERA, Social Security, health insurance, dental insurance, life insurance, workers compensation, salary, and training costs approved by both cities. The costs of training requested by one city but not approved by the other city shall be the sole responsibility of the city making the training request. To the extent possible, all additional costs related to this position shall be approved in writing prior to their expenditure. If either city uses more that its allocated hours, the monthly billing shall be adjusted accordingly to reflect either a credit or additional charge for hours used. 4. DnrMinn :'Inri TpITn. This agreement shall remain in effect unless terminated by \ written notice to the other city by October I of each year for the following year. / \ Notice shall be sent to the party stated in the job description. Both parties would be / I responsible for the annual budget through the end of the calendar year. 5. A llth()rity Each party executes this Agreement pursuant to the authority of these respective governing bodies. 6. nfti"pr~ ()fFmr]()ympnt. Neither city shall make an offer of employment to the individual employed in this agreement during its term. If either city intends on making an offer of employment to the individual hired pursuant to this Agreement, it shall notify the other city by September 1. CITY OF ELK RIVER CITY OF ANDOVER Mayor, City of Elk River Mayor, City of Andover \ , J City Administrator, City of Elk River City Administrator, City of Andover Date Approved by City Council Date Approved by City Council "- / g: datalstafllpaWadmin/contract'jointpowers CITY OF ANDOVER & ELK RIVER \ POSITION DESCRIPTION ) Position Title: Information Systems as) Coordinator Department: Administered bv City of Andover Finance Department Accountable To: Finance Director - Andover and Elk River Status: PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF POSITION: This position is responsible for daily computer operations, setting up new computers, setting up and maintaining Novell and Windows NT networks, assisting and training computer users, assisting in the installation of new computer systems, maintaining telephone system, and recommending and implementing new technology. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the general guidance and direction of the Finance Directors. ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Staff Training and Interaction: A. Provide assistance and coordinate efforts between departments for improvements in use of data processing systems to ensure an efficient and cost-effective information system. , J B. Act as in-house computer system consultant by providing technical support, and trouble shooting hardware and software problems. c. Train and/or coordinate training for PC users. 1. Train new users on signing in procedures, basic Novell/NT Network commands, E-mail, printing and network applications shared by departments. 2. Answer user questions on software support. D. Possess technical knowledge of the Internet and updating of web pages. E. Act as a liaison between computer vendors and users. 2. Network Administration: A. Administer the local area network (LAN). 1. Keep accurate and up to date docwnentation on the LAN> 2. Add new users to network. , 3. Maintain security and check for improper log on. / 4. Perform system backups/restores. 5. Manage computer resources such as disk space so adequate storage is available to run jobs and insure data integrity. 6. Isolate problems in the local area networks. 7. Develop hardware and software standards. B. Keep current with information on hardware and software components of the LAN. \ ) C. Monitor LAN to ensure the network is available to all users and resolves network problems. Solves network problems as they occur and is proactive to network problems. D. Install or assist service installation of all computer software, hardware and peripheral LAN components. E. Develop and implement procedures and controls to provide accuracy, security, product quality, standardization and operational efficiency. F. Coordinate the purchasing, distribution and installation of hardware, software and computer supplies. G. IS Records: 1. Maintain records of data processing difficulties and corrective actions taken. 2. Maintain accurate procedure manuals for step-by-step operation documentation of PC systems. 3. Maintain inventory of computer equipment and supplies. 4. Assist with the identification and tagging of equipment for the fixed asset \ system and insurance list. / H. Develop and maintain Computer Disaster Recovery Plan. I. Coordinate efforts of Technology Committee in developing long and short range strategic planning for citywide IS needs. J. Research, analyze and recommend new or improved uses of technology within the City's system. 3. Telephone and Voice Mail. A. Troubleshoot telephone and voice mail problems, and schedule repairs as necessary. B. Coordinate installation of new equipment/phone lines. C. Train employees on phone and voice mail systems. D. Make changes to voice mail and phone system at employees' request. 4. Other duties as apparent or assigned. \ / 2 NECESSARY KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES: \ 1. Knowledge of a Novell and Microsoft Windows NT network including network ) management, trouble-shooting, security, hardware and software needs, and reporting. 2. Knowledge of PC hardware and software installation, trouble-shooting, setup, configuration, repair and operation. 3. Knowledge of Microsoft Office suites (Word, Excel, Access, etc.). 4. Knowledge of operating systems: Windows 95, Windows 98 and Windows NT. 5. Communications: Able to actively listen to others for understanding of their needs and situations; ability to speak and write English clearly. Able to communicate the information professionally and precisely to the proper recipient. 6. Able to read and understand technical information. Able to explain and write technical procedures and system information in an easily understood and nontechnical manner. 7. Able to organize and prioritize work when handling multiple priorities. 8. Able to maintain neat and orderly records for documentation and easy reference. WORK SCHEDULE: A normal workweek consists of working three (3) days per week at the City of Andover and two (2) days at the City of Elk River. The position will be employed by Andover and time spent in Elk River will be reimbursed according to the joint powers agreement. The schedule can be modified if mutually agreed by the Cities of Andover and Elk River. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: \ . Experience in a technical computer support position. , / . Experience troubleshooting PC hardware and software problems. . Experience in a wide variety of computer software packages and working with hardware. . Minimum of three years network experience desired but not necessary. . Bachelor's degree with Information Technology (IS) or related field desired but not necessary. PREFERRED QUALIFICATIONS: . Certified Network Administrator. . Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer. . Knowledge of Internet access. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT USED: Personal computer, including Microsoft office applications; central financial computer, IO-key calculator, phone, fax and copy machine. PHYSICAL DEMANDS: The physical demands described here are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential fimctions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the es:;ential functions. While performing the duties of this job, the employee is frequently required to sit and talk or hear. , The employee is occasionally required to walk; use hands to operate, finger, handle, or feel objects, J tools, or controls; and reach with hands and arms. 3 Hand-eye coordination is necessary to operate computers and various pieces of office equipment. Employee will be required to use fine motor skills and manual dexterity to manipulate a keyboard '\ and mouse with speed and accuracy; to climb or balance, bend, stoop, crouch or kneel, stretch, ) reach, push and pull to install computers and related equipment; to lift and carry personal computers, printers and related equipment for short distances while installing or removing; to talk, hear and read to communicate with vendors, users, troubleshoot system problems, read computer screens and manuals and manage the network. The employee must occasionally lift and/or move up to 25 pounds. Specific vision abilities required by this job include close vision and the ability to adjust focus. WORK ENVIRONMENT: The work environment characteristics described here are representative of those an employee encounters while performing the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. The noise level in the work environment is usually moderately quiet. SELECTION GUIDELINES: Formal application, rating of education and experience; oral interview and reference check; job related tests may be required. The duties listed above are intended only as illustrations of the various types of work that may be '\ performed. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position " if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to the position. The job description does not constitute an employment agreement between the employer and employee and is subject to change by the employer as the needs of the employer and requirements of the job change. Date: Approval: City Administrator , 8.99 / g:data/staftlpatjljobdescr/finance/is 4 Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes - March 21, 2000 Page 15 / (Northern Natural Gas Pipeline Discussion, Continued) see are the constmction plans showing exactly where the line will go. He asked for those plans to get more details on his property for the appeaL All he got was the alignment sheet which had recently changed. FERC said they do not have constmction plans, which are normally done before the project when the bids are let. Also, there are different departments working on this, and they don't seem to have the same information. He asked that the City send something official stating its position is the Special Use Permit was denied because of problems. Mr. Carlberg stated Staff will contact FERC in the morning to find out. Council agreed. COMMUNITY CENTER STUDY PHASE II, CONTINUED Mr. Fursman stated the Cities of Ramsey and Anoka are both waiting to see whether or not Andover will participate in the study. The school district has not gotten back to him, so he didn't know whether or not they would participate in the study. If the three cities participated, the cost would be one third. The other concern may be the citizens may not want to be taxed for another bond since the school bond has just passed, and there is also talk of an ice arena. Motion by Orttel, Seconded by Johnson, that the Council authorize the funding of the services for Phase II of the community center. DISCUSSION: Mr. Fursman stated he will find out what the other communities want to do and bring back options for funding. Motion carried on a 4- Yes, I-Absent / (Jacobson) vote. SUBMIT L~T OFAPPU~N~ TO ANOKA COUNTY BOARD/COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Motion by Orttel, Seconded by Knight, recommend the Council forward the three applicants to the County Board for possible appointment to the Coon Creek Watershed and note that the Council's first choice is the reappointment of the incumbent Jeffrey Knoll. Motion earned on a 4- Yes, 1- Absent (Jacobson) vote. *- DISCUSS INFORMATION SERVICES TECHNICIAN POSITION Mr. Dickinson reported the Elk River City Council approved the partnering of an Information Services Technician up to 16 hours per week, and they directed their Staff to work with the City of Andover after it approves this. This was done in 1998 with the City of Champlin. This person would work for Andover for 24 hours per week. He felt there is sufficient work given the number of stations. Duties would include working with hardware, software, the network, and assisting in the development of other software. Funding would be from the salary left over after the intern leaves plus a savings on professional services. "' Motion by Orttel, Seconded by Knight to a rove th Services Technician. Motion carried o~ a l~ 1 A~ Staf~;equest ofItem IO for an Information es, - sent acobson) vote. " ;11ATTl'ln',..,_............_..._ ________ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 21. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Staff Finance Jim Dickinson ITEM NO. Discuss Information Services Technician Request: The City Council is requested to authorize staff to negotiate a contract with the City of Elk River to partner in the hiring of an Information Services Technician. Background: March 10, 2000 was the last day of employment for the City's MIS Intern. This individual was scheduled for 20 hours per week and performed such duties as daily computer operations, maintaining the network servers, setting up new computers, PC troubleshooting, and maintaining the City's website. The Technical Committee discussed with the Intern on his last day the duties, and agreed that there is a definite need for a staff member to fill the same or an accelerated role into the future. Current staffing does not provide an efficient solution to our needs. One thought was to bring back the partnering with another city, which was done previously with the City of Champlin in 1998. Over the past week I contacted neighboring cities to see how they are meeting their Information Technology needs and the thought ofpartnering with the City of Andover to share an employee. Of the cities contacted, most have already hired an individual to handle their needs and have no spare technician time. The City of Elk River did indicate that they would be interested in partnering with the City of Andover (up to 16 hours per week) and will be discussing the concept at their March 20, 2000 council meeting. The intent is for the City of Andover to hire an individual as a Information Services Technician, provide the standard benefit package and to share that cost with the City of Elk River based on the percentage of hours each city uses. Funding in 2000 would be from the 2000 Data Processing Budget and 1999 Data Processing carry forward. Funding beyond 2000 would be part ofthe budget process. If there are any questions related to the request please do not hesitate in contacting me. --- CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FORCOUNCILACTION , , DATE: M;I}' " 2nnn , , AGENDA SECTION ORlGINA TING DEPARTMENT N on-Discussion/Consent Administration Richard Fursnan ITS\II NO. rXq, Special City Council Meeting M ~ 11 This serves to announce a special meeting of the City Council to be held May 11,2000 from 5:00 - 8:00 pm. The meeting is being called as a quorum of the City Council is interested in attending a bus tour of affordable housing in Anoka County. The meeting will convene at 1201 89th Avenue NE in Blaine, MN at 5:00 pm. , , RECEIVED . A n.okat COtM'lty APR 2 6 2000 Cont""U'UUMnI of Ccur~ CITY OF ANDOVEn I yw(t(W yo-w'to- cv. 'BUS TOUR of Sponwr~by: Affor~tl~Cw . A I'\Oka, C01M'I.ty C0111.m<<-t'IUy VeNclop met'It" q A n.okat County T11.€/C~ofccw/V *** .61It '--~ .;:'::::;:~::.J:; , -rhur~, lvf~ 11, 2000 5:00 - 8:00 pm; YoW w(ll, ~pvopEWty ~t.fi,edv ~ 1201 - 89th, AVEW\.UelNE affor~~~how (;t 'l3~ lvfN ~W-o-your~. 'B0' cib{e;t"o- etdd-v~fh.e; ~ctt"~ "I After fh.e;fuuy 'oitv ~ (,w .d donJt" wcutt "TH.<9Sf" peopw Gvv ~ 'R0011'r/300 {or C{.I Ug:ht: ~per ~ ~"hoofM" . . C{.Iq~WYl/lM'\MUer ~ See;wfl:y w0'~"TH.AT" ~of ~ (,wour co-wtm<M1fty.. LecLYVlI 'R~~Wa:LooCNV~ who- w euwelopLrtfrfh.e; ~ ~how (;tw.~~ , 'R5W t"&ACCAP Ctt' 783 -4715 I by MCI:Y 8, 2000 oe-\~\ \'J~L ~:S\ ~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Mav 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ADD-ON Scott Erickson, d [ .- Engineering ITEM NO. Set Special Workshop/High School Issues The City Council is requested to select a date for a special workshop to meet with representatives from School District #11 to discuss high school related issues. Possible dates are: * Wednesday, May 1dh at 7:00 PM * Tuesday, May 1(fh at 5:00 PM * Wednesday, May 1 th at 7:00 PM 1v1 ;r; $v c7.u~ ~I PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED AND RESIDENTS AND TAXPAYERS ARE PETITIONING FOR THE STREET LIGHTS MAINTINANCE AND BILLING TO COME OUT OF THE GENARAL FUND LIKE THE OTHER CITIES LIKE BLAINE, COON RAPIDS AND ANOKA DO. PHONE NUMBER U 11..- [, -~0 I 3:)"7 .~ ~ I 7- cl ~ t- c) ~7' ')/37- 'IS I 'Sf -3 d-.. ~/3 -Oi ~ L-ld ~ ~6(L{g "1 7-51j'-ZT/{I' L,- 7 S" :l.- d L- (.. :6 PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED AND RESIDENTS AND TAXPAYERS ARE PETITIONING FOR THE STREET LIGHTS MAINTINANCE AND BILLING TO COME OUT OF THE GENARAL FUND LIKE THE OTHER CITIES LIKE BLAINE, COON RAPIDS AND ANOKA DO. I -,,' .J ~. CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Mav 2. 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Non-Discussion/Consent Item/ADD-ON Scott. Eric~son ~ L Engineering ITEM NO. 25. Reject Bids//98-29/Grey Oaks Extend Bid Award Date/98-29/Grey Oaks (Phase I) The City Council is requested to not reject but to extend the bid award period to May 31, 2000, based on additional information the developersubmitted on Friday, April 28th, for Grey Oaks' (Phase I), Project 98-29. The contractor, Volk Sewer & Water, has agreed to extend their bid to provide the City the time to determine if this will be a project this year. "- : ," . .';. . < < " ~. - , . ., .:. '\ '-,. ~. CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. MOTION by Council member to adopt the following: A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE BID AWARD PERIOD FOR 98-29, GREY OAKS (PHASE I) FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STREETS AND STORM SEWER. WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in Council Resolution No. 188-99 , dated AUQust 17 ,1999, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby extend the bid award period to Mav 31.2000. MOTION seconded by Council member and adopted by the City Council at a reoular meeting this 2nd day of May ,2000 ,with Council members voting in favor of the resolution, and Council members voti ng against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: J.E. McKelvey - Mayor Victoria Volk - City Clerk ...- 65/61/2666 14:66 6125316164 VOLK SEWER AND WATER PAGE 01 j YOLK SEWER & WATER, INC. FAX TRANSMITTAL TO: l~ i (]/hr~ ATTN: )~t-J 'l~ - FROM: Volk Sewer & Water, Inc. DATE: 5/1/~ THIS TRANSMISSION CONSISTS OF Z PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) MESSAGE. Yl~ '::if'" ",J?___h e.}; ~~ ~ fl.s. A. f. . ~ Ji!' l1;"" .M ~fJ ~ (jP ~ ;::Jj,~~ [)~ IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES TRANSMITTED, PLEASE CALL DEBBIE @ (612)537-2921. VOLK SEWER & WATER, INC. FAX # (612)531-0164 MAY 01 '00 14:25 6125310164 PAGE. 01 1:10/1:111 :L1:1l:H:l 14:f:l5 51253H:ll 54 VOLK SEWER AND WATER PAGE 02 '" \. e YOLK SEWER &: WATER, INC. Underground Utility Contractors 8909 Bass Creek Court Fax: 612.S31.0164 Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55428 Td:612-S37.2921 May 1. 20000 City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd, N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Attn: Scott Erickson Subject: Bid for Grey Oaks City Project 98-29 Dear Scott: We will agree to extend the award period for the above referenced project to May 31. 2000. Due to the delay in the award, we will have to negotiate a new completion date. All of my suppliers and subcontractors agreed last fall to hold their prices so the work may be completed in the spring of 2000. We look forward to working with you on this project. Sincerely. VOLK SEWER & WATER, INC. i0~", '11. '-() ~ Debra K. Volk President MAY 01 '00 14:25 6125310164 PAGE. 02 . May-OZ-OO 08:0Zam From-PROP REC & TAX 6123235421 T-676 P.02l05 F-872 . April 17, 2000 To The City Council aud Planning & Zoning, Re: Discharge of FirearmslHunting Petition We would like to voice our concerns regarding the hunting ordinance and would like the City Council to change the ordinance to no discharge of any firearms at any time south of 161 .r. We have great concerns with the new developments coming in to the north by Fields & Sons, Woodland Estates 2nd Addition to the south and with the new school coming in so close. It is to the point where some of us can not even feel safe in our own backyard. A neighbor has already been bit witb pellets while be was on the roof of him home because hunters were too close. We are afraid to let our children play outside, let our dogs out and to even walk in our own backyard. There have been a lot of problems with hunters coming too close to our homes, walking on our properties and we have also been experiencing hunting out of season in which the DNR and Police have been notified and are trying to monitor. The most recent incident the police were called and the hunters told the police they had consent from the farmer to hunt woodchuck witb bow and arrow at 7:00pm at nigbt, these individuals were from Bloomington and at the time nothing was open to hunt. We know this. is a DNR issue but we want you to realize that this is a year round problem and although we realize bow and arrow hunting will probably always be allowed for control the guns should be taken out immediately to cut down on some of the safety issues and problems. We understand an owner should be able to do whatever they would like with their property but not when it effects the safety of so many adults, children and pets. There was not one person who abuts the farmlands that did not want to sign this petition because we are alJ tired ofthe problems and gun shots. The City of Andover has become too urbanized with this rapid growth for hunting with guns on these farm fields. And with alJ these residential areas and developments coming in we can't believe that there cnn be any deer left. Just during a short 2-night petition signing 8 families stated that they6 have had huntel5with guns 00 their property! Who monitors this? Who can control it? Who is liable when someone is burt or killed? Does the fanner or the City of Andover for allowing this ordinance with the amount of density in our city? Here are some ofthe most recent situations: . A neighbor stated that during hunting season they looked out of their window to see 14 hunters in their visible sight. . Another neighbor stated they were giving a baby shower for 20 women in the fall and saw 11 hunter walking around with guns hunting and you could barely talk because the guns shots were so loud and distracting. How do you think our children feel hearing all the gun shots? Do they have to feel frightened in there own neighborhood'~ MAY 02 '00 09:04 6123235421 PAGE. 02 May-UZ-UO 09:0Zam From-PROP REC & TAX 61Z3Z354Z1 T-676 P,03/05 F-87Z .- . Another neighbor stated tbat he and his daughter walked towards the back of their lot aod heard something, looked up and there was a hunter on their property. . Another family was able to watch a deer get shot right from the window of their home. A lot of these families said they have called the city and that nothing has been done in the last year. We think it is time for the city to take a hard look at the rapid growth and density and make some changes. The City of Andover has become too urbanized for this. We appreciate your consideration in making our neighborhoods safe before a serious accident happens. What we as families with children want to see: . Absolutely no discharge of firearms/guns at any time of the year. . A quick decision to change the ordinance before the next hunting season . A requirement that the farmers must give each bow & arrow hunter a copy of the ordinance so they know the rules. . A change in the bow & arrow ordinance to be 500 ft away from a property instead of 150ft. This wi)) hopefully keep them away from our bomes. There are so many fields to hont in why do they have to be io the back of our borne where we can see them with their bow & arrow? . We would like the City Council to ask staff for a recommendation since they are the ones who receive a Jot of the caUs and may not get to you. Remember we do not have much time before the next hunting season please act quickly. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. MAY 02 '00 09:04 6123235421 PAGE. 03 . MaY-Ul-UU U~:Ulam From-PROP REC & TAX 6123235421 T-676 P.04/05 F-872 - -\"~ \ -:p .(...,-\.~ -\-, b ~ -"R.I.:. ~u-.'- -: V""\. ~ Name Signatures . Address ~i''''- A-y..-cl.-\- ~ .;2.::81 I~ l...~, iVw 10M" De.bb'1 Dcv\Q_~~ (1. ~ 1 SSg'-{ fCll. Vel) St. !JCJ, f),v.;.. <I ~ ~ ~ I.:'" D 'cJ(: S 0'-" I $'(P;). q /@iXrI $- j0'-' j~ f ~\G" W\f€6U:;iL ~ISb 70 ~ s. tVvJ baY1~{A'ndl-J Be,nninJ-h1l . l,b3g t<a.~-hN '8riU\-t He.fcLc: Flod-k. ~. v-:LL- l ~(47 Ravl-n Sf- tvw H1JeJr~~ &;..~ J~Vf ~~t'flU, G'l5l f.,M ~ l'5bS I o.s'i~ g, 0. W ~t ~J~~~ ~~~~ ~ -Bru0~ ' 2~1 ' l66'i--h Ln IVW ~ '~ n 0o-rlniillOo.. \).,...~ ~h.n ~ Klw.n ~ A. ~ Z:;3?J - (55fft ]..A'\. tJ LV ArvUJve.r Id/llf f #J#i /60~~ ,r <-- 0'//,9- /~~<'P'cJ ~PCJ~ . ~ .Ca.,y S~ 5 gVVvt~ ~l'+ ttfctfh..Ave IUvJ ~ c.AtaM g( 5/h. 'Y7 0 c.AaM.~-'h;> 2t't' 107;-1>. i/>-t< /jVv/tn~ ~~ 5t-y~ ~. Ou .Q... d-~ lLf'1~ ~V\~ l-~o~ bdMA.JJ GlQ ::2.d Ie 1- ) ~1-h A;r/ t . N.)J ~ D 11 t r --r;;" c..nS+' ~. k 2. 2... "'\ \ l'l"l-K A->--e lJeJ ~+-Lt$.~(J,~ _ 2-2-<\&'" /~~J-r#L./, 2,. / I~ -t' KeL'1 SlR.eef ~;3 Ve /4-9 -Ifz fIw f/{t/I. ~ cC- Keller S4/~ ~ ILt9' II:> t,{yt~4~&' t.<. V~ (~l u.J L~ J'lc.a- le.:,p.2..:q- L~'o- I ~1'1 ;n. u.pla~J~P ,qo~ u,J. \0"'-1 ::;po.rrot-J " J'I"I5 7 c'\p I"", J.r ,4..... A/ J How~reo 5yl/(/SOAl (fJ~ f'/97<{ Uf'/"",J,.... 5'1 ,</UI, MAY 02 '00 09:04 6123235421 PAGE. 04 . MaY-Ut-uu u~:u'am ~rOm-rKUr K~" & lAX 61Z3Z354Z1 T-676 P,05/05 F-87Z / ""~ '-'\ Name Signatures Address .-.... . ~ 1~58<O O-P(..f1NDt.~ 5-6, J~F B V"R...c~ ~LM~' z~ l~ 7k- f\}uJ L;S(l[1)YYj l)~ 14911 LLp/CU1fkr-df. ~L tNevtdy KeVlV1f4{fy 4>> (~{) Upuuvlfr-5i:- }}{;u M; r. ~ I ~ ~ 15<7"-" '4>f....L.. N-....<-J ::rQQ~-€. &bI0S '&b.1o::> 1600lD UP\a.rQ.o.rst ;Ardtly~ ~~ . er (~.owem. ~d.fq /6oVU;:;.oe-1lW I/hd1.fJe ~ 6'ahv ' . & cil/J/ft, )//fIt,.f ~d L~Pr~5~ . - . ~~ft Ilq--t1ut;.tJk ;f..,..v<-t W"6iO~ 1ft:t ;;)1'( 11'i~ Ae YlIV'- ~d ~C:;;-~ ~ ~ {L4Sl..,...)A't SI ~W C,on n i e J QC.,KSOlj &rWt ~'\J lL/q~<6 ~ st. '1Jl~ af'!!1t. YJ1~ 1M /5138 ~ 2t- ~ hannOll uJtz. Jhaw,~ . r2Jt./8 /SIo-ffl ~ NW. ~ ~ // ;A( ~ ~ e1.J;;;A rzlltf /J(t11 ~ /1/(// O\;~,y.,., /1LL~ qJ-,~/N. a.oOO 151<' /.:r. .IJ\!J ~\Ji:(J!\\,-CS ~ Q~ )/;2-1 J~ L-i01\lvJ ~ () ({ (p /5") t-r;Ne /lJw ~v-.LVh ov-t~ ~frI~, 2./(;;/ (J7 ~ LPl..<. tVw \!I~( ~Oe,1D~ ~~ 2101 JSlh.. ~& Nw 'Do..., [.J~.,...,.. ;[057 {:;; 7T1-1 LI-~ lVLJ ,. MAY 02 '00 09:05 6123235421 PAGE. 05 ~ . ., - COUNTY OF ANOKA Public Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD. N,W., ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 (612) 862-4200 FAX (612) 862-4201 From the desk of JON G, OLSON, PE COUNIY ENGINEER (763) 862-4213 MEMORANDUM April 25, 2000 TO: City Managers, City Clerks, Township Boards, Public Works Directors, City Engineers, County Engineers FRDMrJ . Jon G. 01000, PE . / County Engineer I RE: 2001 - 2006 Five-Year Highway Improvement Plan Please find enclosed a copy of the 2001-2006 Five-Year Highway Improvement Plan for Anoka County. The County Board approved this plan on April 25, 2000, which also shows the 2000 component of the highway budget for informational purposes. Some of the work included in the 2000 component of the Plan is already underway and we anticipate that construction will take place on all of the major projects contained in the 2000 plan during this construction season. The Plan also includes a detailed listing for improvements to the Anoka County highway system scheduled for the years 2001-2006. This document is to be used only as a planning document and is not a commitment on the part of Anoka County to fund any project in the year shown. In the Anoka County budget cycle, no project is funded until the County Board approves the budget in December of the preceding year. For example, the 2000 component of this Plan was approved in December of 1999 and the 2001 component in this Plan will not be approved until December 2000. The 5-Year Highway Improvement Plan however, does give direction as to which projects should be pursued through the environmental, design, and right-of-way process so that they can be constructed in the , years budgeted. In approving this Plan the County Board made it clear that the Plan was approved subject to the availability of human resources as well as financial resources to implement the components of the Plan. Again, this year, the Plan has a significant maintenance component and includes approximately 2 million dollars on an annual basis for overlays, cold in-place recycling and crack sealing. The anticipated maintenance projects for 2000-2001 are shown on Pages 8, 9 and 10 of the document. Pages 11-17 shows projects, which will probably not be improved during the next 20 years. This list is reviewed annually because development pressures change as do the needs of the transportation system. These roadways have been assigned a project year of 2049 and are intended to be roadways which will be maintained in or near their current cross section for the next 20 years. They are assigned the year 2049 only for sorting purposes and that designation has no other significance. Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer . . 2001 - 2006 Five-Year Highway Improvement Plan April2S,2000 Page Two The second part of the document begins on Page 19 and extends through Page 37. This part of the document highlights reconstruction projects that the County Board anticipates pursuing during the next five years. Projects in the first three or four years of this Plan are already being worked on, however, projects included in later years of the Plan are included so that we can apply for Federal funding. At the bottom of each annual project listing, a summary of finances is included for the projects listed in that year. In addition, in the far right-hand column of each list, anticipated participation by local units of government are listed. I want to caution the local units of government that the numbers included in this column are extremely rough estimates of participation expected. Actual local participation will be detennined at the time the project is ready for bids. Again, this year the Plan includes a bond sale in 2001. While the prospects for selling these bonds appears to be . encouraging I would caution the reader that the County Board has not taken action authorizing the sale of these bonds and I do not expect that they will until at least December of2000. A decision not to sell these bonds will significantly impact the ability of us to deliver the projects listed in 2001 and beyond. In the later years of the Plan, many of the projects shown will require additional funding from other sources such as local units of government, Mn/DOT or Federal funds. Anoka County will continue to attempt to maximize the use of outside funds for these projects, as the opportunity becomes available through the region wide solicitation and other methods. You may note that 2001 and 2002 include approximately 42 million dollars in projects which we intend to construct using only 16.5 million county dollars which consists of our County State Aid funds and the levy designated for construction. The balance of the funds shown in these two years is either Federal, State or Municipal funds, which are shown on the individual tables as indicated above. Part 3 of the document begins on Page 39 and highlights other projects. Two lists are contained in this section. The first list is a list with the year designation 2010. This is intended to be a list of projects that other units of government have requested or that the county has made a commitment to Metropolitan Council for their construction. This list contains approximately 68 million dollars in projects and it does not appear as though funds will be available to get to any of them prior to 2007. . Keep in mind that projects listed in later years of the Plan will likely shift depending on funding. The second list contained in Part 3 is a list of other projects that have been identified for either capacity or safety reasons. This list contains III million dollars in projects and comprises the list of other projects that we will be working to fund in the next 20 years. Adding the two lists together, one arrives at a figure of 180 million dollars spread over a IS-year period or approximately 12 million dollars per year. This is beyond Anoka County's ability to fund and outside funds will become necessary for all of these projects to be implemented. It must be pointed out as indicated in the introductory letter found on Pages 1-3 that the bond sales of 1999 and the requested bond sales for 2001 will result in a large payment for these bonds over the following ten years. These payments will reduce the amount of funds available for the years 2002 and beyond, however, the Plan anticipates that increases in our State Aid allotment will compensate for the amount of the payment and the Plan has anticipated that our State Aid allotment available for . - 2001 - 2006 Five-Year Highway Improvement Plan April 25, 2000 Page Three reconstruction projects will remain at approximately 3 million dollars a year through the life of the Plan. If you have questions regarding this document, please feel free to contact me or my staff at 862- 4400. xc: Anoka County Commissioners Enclosure: 5- Year Highway Improvement Plan . , . COUNTY OF ANOKA Public Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD. NW., ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 (612) 862-4200 FAX (612) 862-4201 From the desk of JON G. OLSON, PE COUNTY ENGINEER (612) 662-4213 MEMORANDUM April25,2000 TO: Anoka County Board of Commissioners - FRO~ Jon G. Olson, PE County Engineer RE: ,Proposed 2001 - 2006 Five-Year Plan It is again my pleasure to present to you, the proposed 2001-2006 Five-Year Highway Improvement Plan for Anoka County. The theme of this plan is similar to plans of the past several years with a continued emphasis on preservation of the existing Anoka County Highway System combined with a more aggressive program of major improvement projects. This aggressive approach is possible due to a significant amount of funding from outside sources. Anoka County has made a strong financial commitment to the preservation and management types of projects over the past couple of years. All years of the Five-Year Plan contain nearly $2 million dollars annually for preservation efforts, which include bridge maintenance, crack filling, overlays and cold in-place recycling projects. These projects are highlighted in part one of the Five Year Plan. Part one also includes a listing of road segments that are in a "Preserve" mode. These preserve type projects are shown with a construction year of2049. Further information is shown on Page 7. Another important aspect of preservation has been implemented during 1998 with the implementation of a Pavement Management System. The output from this, system was instrumental in choosing the crack sealing and overlay segments of the preservation component of our budget for 1998'lind we feel that this system will be .an even greater influence on the selection of projects in the ", preservation area in the years to come. The second part of the Five-Year Plan is entitled, "Reconstruction Projects 2000-2006". The first three years of this plan are relatively balanced financially, however, the years 2004 and 2005 include many projects for which federal and/or state funds are being applied for. These projects are identified in those years so that the County may continue pursuing outside funds for those projects. If outside funds are not forthcoming on those projects, it is likely that those projects will slip into othef'-yelirs further out than 2005. The needs of the Anoka County traveling public and the continued development of the core cities in Anoka County, has caused us to look at ways to fund significant expansion projects in the near future as well as the preservation projects discussed above. The County Board sold bonds in 1999 to assist in this effort. The Highway Department has requested that the County Board sell an additional $4.5 million in bonds in 2001. In addition, several projects have received Federal STP and RES funds over the past two solicitations. The plan includes the following funding assumptions: Affirmative Action I Eaual Oooortunitv Emolover , -2- County State Aid and Levy $37,465,000 County SA Bonds $ 4,500,000 Federal funds obtained $ 8,791,416 State funds committed (turnback) $15,144,560 State funds (RES) $ 2,680,000 Federal Funds Park and Ride $ 1,500,000 City/other County funds $ 4,011,264 Federal funds requested $ 9,100,000 State funds requested $ 5,000,000 TOTAL $88,192,240 The third part of this plan is called "Other Projects". These projects are broken down into two lists. The first list has a year indication of2010. These projects are projects which have been requested by various units of government or individuals, but for which funding is not available in the Five-Year Planning time frame. The second list of projects has the year OTHER, which indicates other and again, projects, which could not be funded in the current Five-Year Plan. These projects are projects that have been identified, as being needed improvements for safety and/or capacity reasons. This list conforms to the current Anoka County 2015 Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The Five-Year Plan focuses on continued improvements on Radisson Road and its interchange with I-35W, Lexington Avenue from the south county line to 149th Avenue, interchange improvements at Lake Drive and County Road "]" at I-35W, and the preservation of County Road 10 (Old TH 10) in part. The county funding shown includes some proposed bonding funds to assist in moving some projects forward. It needs to be stated clearly that the repayment of these bonds is scheduled to come from the Anoka County State Aid Funds which are dispersed annually by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Division of State Aid. Also, the County Board will have to approve sale of these bonds at some future date. The sale of these bonds and the repayment from future State Aid allotments, will have a considerable impact on the ability of Anoka County to respond to other needs. Again, it is with pleasure that I submit this Five-Year Highway Improvement Plan for your consideration and encourage the County Board to continue to support preserving the backbone of the Anoka County System over the next 5-year period. ~ , . ANOKA COUNTY FIVE-YEAR PLAN Explanation of Columns Column 1 - Type of Project C.W.- County Wide - used for projects not yet identified as to location such as overlays or signals. C.R. - County Road Projects C.S.A.H. - County State Aid Highway Project Column 2 - Road Number Column 3 - Project Number if Assigned Column 4 - Description of Project Column 5 - Year project is currently scheduled for "Other" indicates after five years Column 6 - Estimated Construction Costs (County $ only) Column 7 - City Costs This column is a very preliminary estimate of what costs the city listed might expect to pay toward the project. It is only an estimate and may not reflect the actual city cost which will be determined during project development and design. > - 4 - , , PART 1 REHABILIT A TION PROJECTS " - 5 - , I Introduction to Part 1 Rehabilitation Proiects Part 1 includes projects, which are scheduled for rehabilitation in 2000, and 2001 along with a listing of road segments, which we feel, are appropriate for the rehabilitation category. Segments of roadway which are in the rehabilitation category have been assigned a "year" of 2049. Over the next 20 years, it is expected that these routes will not be reconstructed but will be maintained with essentially their current cross section. There are two types of projects included in this list; the first type is roadways that have been reconstructed in the past 20-25 years and which have a cross-section that currently meets state standards. Noting a "0" as the "Cost Estimate" under the column entitled "Engineer's Estimate" identifies these projects. The second type of road segments are road segments that are deficient in cross-section, but that have lower traffic volumes and, probably cannot be funded for reconstruction in the foreseeable future. These road segments can be identified because there is a number other than zero under the "Engineer's Estimate". The annual funding identified for preservation of these routes is $1,905,000. It should be noted that the $1,905,000 must be shared with projects needing maintenance work in all other categories, In addition, on Page 16 you can see that there is a total of$141,435,268 estimated as the cost for reconstruction ofthose segments of roadway that are deficient in cross-section on this Ii st. . _ 7 _ , ( = ...; C/) It) Q) co " (ij J: 0 C) l- e: a= :;::l 0 ~ - A. C) " z --. 0 z It) ~ ~ - CO a> c..> ~ :c :c - I- c:5 "0 W .9 > "0. en c..> iij 1!: .-.. - cc ~ ~ ~ ~ e: e: y = E- O , cc Cll l/l Iii e: Q) c: Cll ~ e> 0 :c U 0 c..> E ~ 0 e c ~ - C ~ - ~ ~ C Q) S <( ~ N .=:: c: E 'E cc ::) e (') ~ E It) , - E ~ e --. "'" cD e ... .-.. ~ - ~ cD .-.. ~ :5 CiS c: :J ~ cc ~ Q) :t:: (0 >- ~ ~ T"" ~ T"" .;l- T"" J: ~ ~ (0 c;j 0:: c..> c..> c..> .;I- - 8 - . ) ....... -g CD ... 0 "C - tU ~ Ul la .lY .0 :lIE .~ E ::5- Q) = c: CO ~ C\I &:) :c ,.... ....... 03 0 .... v D:: C\I u ~ :c A. CJ5 .s .s = - U ~ ] 0 .J ..... ~ CD a= - ... ~ j 0 W "0 > c:: Ul lJJ 0 0 .E Ul Ul 0 tU Q 0> Z .0 "8 ....... E Q :c c:!i < Q ....... CO C'\l (J) :c C\I v CJ5 ~ ~ u E u u .g E E e .g - s..: - Cl - - s..: +oJ Q) Cl (/J c:: c:: 0 .c ..... 0 !:? Ul l!! Q) CO 0> Q) "C -g ....... .C:: 0 CD a. .... ....... ....... :c .... .... 03 ,.... co ex: ex: u u u .... C\I M - 9 - I , , , - ...: en c .co :E "'":" - - ..; :IE "It ~ C ..... ~ :c Q) = ~ cJ5 0) ~ c :.i2 " (.) :?. 0 - Q) .9 co ,.j e> LO ~ - N 0:: ~ 0 -g N II. Q) (.) Q) (9 ~ ... CD 0 = Q) ~ .... > ~ - a: CIS (.) "t:I ... ..J .5 ~ ~ E :2 .9 Q) ~ 0 ... - IU ~ cD ~ > - 0 c ~ CIS .... 0 f'-.. 1 ::s ..J ei5 ~ CD tl ... - ~ 't'" co ..... Q CD ..... co c (.) ..c ..... ::s Q :t: ..... - ~ OJ :c ~ CD N ,g ~ - . f'-.. ..... c7j co .9 E 0:: ..... "It (.) (.) ..... LO F .g E :c co E c7j :c E - e e I- ,.j 't-' - (.) E .g ~ "'":" - CD ~ -g E e - - cD ~ c as e - ~ - cD CIS 0 C - ..J II) Q) ~ ~ ..c "t:I II) ..c - c 'C ~ <l: "E ~ ::s l2. ~ .c (t) ~ z .... LO - f'-.. ~ - N - - ..... - en LO LO f'-.. ..... :c :c :c :c ~ co c7j c7j c7j c7j 0:: en (.) (.) (.) (.) (.) (.) ..... N (t) ~ LO co - 10 - . I .';,:'::. :,:;' :" ,', '_',~noka County Highway Department , " , ' " . F" Y PI :,;"::',;'::~..,;,,:':,,, ,;,", ...', " :' . Ive ear an Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs CSAH 1 S CR CITY LMTS TO 93RD LN 2049 0 CSAH 1 ,05 S OF RICE CK WAY TO CRAIG WAY 2049 0 CSAH 1 F AI 694 TO 0,05 S OF RICE CK. WAY 2049 0 CSAH 1 84TH A VB TO RICKARD RD 2049 CSAH 1 S CTY LINE TO FAI 694 2049 0 CSAH 1 RIESLING TO CSAH 7 2049 2,212,123 CSAH 2 C,R 102 TO TH 47 2049 0 CSAH 2 TH 47 TO TH 65 2049 0 CSAH 2 TH 65 TO E CTY LINE 2049 0 CSAH 2 CSAH 1 TO CR 102 (MAIN ST) 2049 0 C.R. 3 CSAH 1 TO TH 47 2049 0 CSAH 3 TH 10TOTH47 2049 0 CSAH 4 TH 65 TO CSAH 2 2049 0 CSAH 4 TH47 TOTH 65 2049 0 CSAH 5 N JCf CR 63 TO CSAH 22 2049 0 CSAH 5 CSAH 22 TO CSAH 24 2049 0 CSAH 5 TH 47TON JCTCR63 2049 0 CSAH 6 5th ST NE TO TH 65 2049 0 CSAH 6 CSAH 1 TO 0.37 MI EAST 2049 0 . CSAH 6 0.37 MI EAST OF CSAH 1 TO 5th ST 2049 0 CSAH 6 TH 65 TO CSAH 35 2049 0 CSAH 6 CSAH 35 TO EAST COUNTY LINE 2049 0 CSAH 7 CR 27 TO CSAH 22 2049 0 CSAH 7 CR58 TO CR27 2049 0 CSAH 7 GRANTSTTO 141ST 2049 0 CSAH 7 02-607-16 S. TH 10 RAMP TO GRANT (TH 288) 2049 0 CSAH 7 CSAH 14TOS,TH 10 RAMP 2049 1,310,999 CSAH 8 MAIN ST TO TH 47 2049 655,499 CSAH 8 TH47TOTH65 2049 0 Tuesday;AprillS,.2000 . . ' . . Page 1 of6 - 11 - 1 , Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs CSAH 8 CSAH 1 TO MAIN 2049 0 CSAH 8 TII 65 TO CSAH 35 2049 400,000 CSAH 8 CSAH 35 TO EAST CTY LINE 2049 631,843 CSAH 9 CSAH 116 TO .39 MI. NORTII 2049 0 CSAH 9 CSAH 14 TO CSAH 116 2049 0 CSAH 9 N JCT 20 TO N. ANDOVER CITY LIMITS 2049 2,560,577 CSAH 9 S. OAK GROVE LIMITS TO 1.5 M NORTII 2049 1,600,361 CSAH 9 1.5 M N. OF ANDOVER TO 3.5 M N. 2049 2,133,814 CSAH 9 3.5 M N. TO 4.6 M N. OF ANDOVER 2049 1,173,598 CSAH 9 4.6 M N. OF ANDOVER TO CSAH 24 2049 1,813,742 CSAH 10 CSAH 49 TO CSAH 21 2049 0 C.R. 10 CR 53 TO .2M SO. OF CSAH 23 2049 0 CSAH 11 RAVEN ST TO CSAH 18 2049 1,152,814 CSAH 11 TII 10 TO CSAH 12 (NORTIIDALE) 2049 0 CSAH 11 CSAH 1 TOTII 10 2049 0 CSAH 12 950'E OF TH 65 TO CR 52 RADISSON 2049 0 CSAH 12 CSAH/CR 52 TO CSAH 17 2049 0 CSAH 12 832' W OF TII 65 TO 950'E OF TII 65 2049 0 CSAH 12 FOLEY TO CSAH 51 (UNIVERSITY) 2049 CSAH 12 CSAH 51 TO TII 65 2049 CSAH 12 CR 53 TO CSAH 153 LILAC DR 2049 0 CSAH 13 CR 103 TO CSAH 24 2049 1,699,542 CSAH 13 CSAH 22 TO CR 103 2049 3,823,970 CSAH 14 10th ST TO CSAH 9 2049 0 CSAH 14 CSAH 23 TO I-35W 2049 0 CSAH 14 CSAH 17 TO CSAH 23 2049 0 CSAH 14 CSAH 1 TO 10 ST 2049 1,966,498 CSAH 14 TII 65 TO CSAH 17 2049 0 C.R. 15 217th AVE TO 229th A VB 2049 1,274,657 C.R. 15 CSAH22 TO 213thAVE 2049 2,379,359 CSAH 16 CSAH #78 TO T.R. 65 2049 3,144,153 CSAH 17 NORTII ROAD TO I-35W 2049 Tuesday, April 18, 2000. Page 2 of6 - ,? - , . Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs CSAH 18 CSAH 19 TO EAST CTY LINE 2049 2,549,313 CSAH 18 SJCTCSAH 17 TON JCTCSAH 17 2049 0 C.R. 18 HANSON BLVD TO CSAH 20 2049 1,444,611 CSAH 18 N JCT CSAH 17 TO CSAH 19 2049 0 CSAH 18 CSAH 1 TO CSAH 11 NORTHDALE 2049 0 CSAH 18 TH 242 TO CSAH 116 (BUNKER) 2049 0 C.R. 18 CSAH 116 TO ANDOVER BLVD 2049 0 CSAH 18 CSAH 20 TO TH 65 2049 0 CSAH 18 TH 65 TO CSAH 17 2049 0 CSAH 19 CSAH 18 TO CSAH 23 2049 2,549,313 CSAH 20 CSAH 9 TO CSAH CSAH 18 2049 0 CSAH 20 CSAH 7 TO CSAH 9 2049 0 CSAH 21 C.R. 140 TO CSAH 23 2049 3,229,130 CSAH 21 CSAH 14 TO CR 140 (80th AVE) 2049 1,954,473 CSAH 22 WEST LIMITS LINWOOD TO OLD CSAH 2049 0 26 CSAH 22 TH 65 TO EAST LIMITS OF EAST 2049 0 BETHEL CSAH 22 OLD CSAH 26 TO EAST COUNTY LINE 2049 0 CSAH 22 CSAH 5 TO TH 47 2049 0 CSAH 22 TH 47 TO CSAH 9 2049 0 CSAH 22 CSAH 9 TO CR 67 2049 0 " CSAH 22 E JCT CR 67 TO TH 65 2049 0 CSAH 24 TH 47 TO WEST COUNTY LINE 2049 6,203,328 CSAH 24 CSAH 28 TO TH 65 2049 6,203,328 CSAH 24 TH 65 TOCR 76 2049 2,719,267 CSAH 26 CR 15 TO CSAHlCR 85 2049 2,719,267 CSAH 26 CSAH 24 TO CR 15 2049 2,974,199 C.R. 27 CR 7TOTH 47 2049 0 CSAH 28 CSAH 24 TO TH 47 2049 0 CSAH 28 TH 47 TO NORTH COUNTY LINE 2049 3,993,924 CSHA 31 MAIN ST TO GRANT ST 2049 0 CSAH 32 BALTIMORE ST TO W FR TGE RD I-35W' 2049 0 Tuesday,; April 18. 2000 ~,,- . " . ' , . . Page3of6 _ 1'>; _ , , Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs CSAH 32 CSAH 23 TO .3 M E OF W LMT CIR.PINE 2049 0 CSAH 35 N LEG CSAH 6 TO N LEG CSAH 8 2049 2,161,527 CSAH 35 02-635-07 N LEG CSAH 6 TO TH 65 2049 2,949,497 CSAH 51 92nd A VB TO 97th A VB 2049 0 CSAH 51 97th AVE TO 1 lOth LN N 2049 0 CSAH 52 HAMUNE TO CSAH 17 2049 0 C.R. 53 CR 10 TO CSAH 12 2049 0 C,R. 53 CSAH 12 TO CSAH 14 2049 2,066,434 C.R. 54 S. CTY LINE TO CSAH 14 2049 2,464,336 C.R. 56 TH 10 TO CSAH 5 2049 0 C.R. 57 CSAH 116 TO CSAH 5 2049 0 C.R. 59 CSAH 20 TO CR 58 2049 2,039,450 C.R. 60 TH 65 TO CSAH 17 2049 0 C.R. 60 87-06-60 TH 65 TO CSAH 20 2049 1,699,542 C.R. 61 TH 65 TO CR 52 2049 849,771 C.R. 61 CR52 TO CR60 2049 1,529,588 C.R. 62 CSAH 23 TO CSAH 18 2049 2,974,199 C.R. 62 CSAH 18 TO EAST CO LINE 2049 1,274,657 C.R. 63 CSAH 5 TO CSAH 83 2049 2,549,313 C.R. 63 CSAH 5 TO TH 47 2049 934,748 C.R. 65 CSAH 22 TO CSAH 5 2049 1,529,588 C,R. 66 CSAH 24 TO TH 47 2049 3,823,970 C.R. 67 CR 58 TO CSAH 22 2049 1,274,657 C.R. 68 CSAH.18 TO CSAH 22 2049 2,379,359 C,R. 69 CR 70 TO CSAH 24 2049 934,748 C.R. 70 CSAH 24 TO CSAH 28 2049 4,588,763 C.R. 71 NORTH CO LINE TO CSAH 24 2049 1,954,473 c.R. n CSAH 24 TO CSAH 24 2049 3,059,176 C.R. 73 NORTH CO LINE TO CSAH 24 2049 3,277,497 C.R. 74 65 TO 217th A VB 2049 4,163,878 c.R. 74 DURANT ST TO CSAH 22 2049 1,954,473 C.R. 74 CSAH 13 TO TH 65 2049 2,039,450 Tuesday,ApriI18,2000. . Page 4 of6 . . , I .',- . Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs C.R. 75 CSAH 22 TO CR 77 2049 2,379,359 C,R. 76 CSAH 24 TO CSAH 36 2049 5,948,397 C.R. 77 CR 75 TO CSAH 36 2049 1,699,542 CSAH 78 CSAH 20 TO CR 58 2049 0 CSAH 78 CSAH 116 TO CSAH 20 2049 0 C.R. 79 CSAH 9 TO 1900 FT SOUTHWEST 2049 0 C.R. 81 CSAH 28 TO TH 47 2049 1,019,725 C.R. 82 WEST CO LINE TO CR 65 2049 764,794 CSAH 83 TH 10TO 161stAVE 2049 0 CSAH 83 161s1 TO 173rd (CR 63) 2049 0 C,R. 84 SOUTH CO LINE TO CSAH 14 2049 2,549,313 C,R. 85 CSAH 26 TO CR 76 .2049 0 CSAH 85 CSAH 22 TO CSAH 26 2049 0 C.R. 86 CSAH 13 TO TH 65 2049 0 C.R. 87 TH 65 TO CSAH 52 2049 0 C.R. 102 MAIN ST. TO .1 MILES WEST 2049 0 C,R. 102 1-694 TO 57th AVE 2049 344,406 C.R. 102 44th AVE TO 1_694 2049 0 C,R. 103 CSAH 24 TO CSAH 13 2049 1,274,657 C.R. 104 CR 102 TO TH 47 2049 0 C.R. 106 CSAH 35 TO EAST CO LINE 2049 0 C,R. 108 CSAH 35 TO EAST CO LINE 2049 0 C.R. 110 99-07-110 CSAH 17 TO 0.3 EAST 2049 344,406 C,R. 116 CR 56 TO CSAH 83 2049 CSAH 116 CSAH 9 TO CSAH 78 2049 CSAH 116 CSAH 7 TO CSAH 9 2049 0 CSAH 116 CSAH 9 TO .15 M EAST OF CSAH 9 2049 0 CSAH 116 0.11 M W OF TH 47 TO CSAH 7 2049 0 C.R. 153 CR53 TOCSAH 153 2049 849,771 C,R. 154 CSAH 21 TO CR 54 2049 679,817 C.R. 158 CSAH 7TO CR 58 2049 509,863 C.R. 163 CSAH 22 TO CSAH 5 2049 2,124,428 Tuesday; April 18. 2000. ,'.' , ; PageS of6 - - .,........-................. ..-. ........_... .r. .-......! Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs * * SubTotal * * 141,435,268 Tuesday~ April 18, 2000 " , , ' "rage 60f6 . . . , ~. '" z*~ f' ,! '" -~ i ...;.-:"'\\ '-' - - ! t~J;..~) '. j I '~I ...~~~~~. (;':~" ;:~,:':.~:) '---' '" ,"-.. ! z+'~ i \i i '\ . J: I- - z 3: 0 lIJ i= w .. ~ t) > :s: w c: " i lIJ W Cl ..J lIJ <t ..J w ~! o ~ c: c: u.. c... . [-- '-- t - \ i :..___._......._...._....___M'"'\__..___ . , , PART 2 RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2000 to 2006 " ) - 19 - . Introduction to Part 2 Part 2 consists of individual listings for the years 2000-2006 and constitutes the Five Year Highway Improvement Plan. Year 2006 is included because some of the 2005 projects have components in 2006. You will note that in each of the years 2000-2006, funds have been set aside for bridge maintenance, cold inplace recycling, crack filling and overlay projects. These funds essentially will be used to maintain the routes listed in Part 1 and Part 3 of this document. The projected spending for 2000-2006 is essentially balanced but you will find that 2003 is over programmed significantly. The balance in years 1999-2002 is achieved through issuing State Aid Bonds in the amount of 4.5 million dollars in 2001 and aggressive posture as it relates to obtaining outside funds. The issuance of these bonds allowed the construction of some major projects in 1999 and will allow additional projects to be built in 2001 if the County Board approves their sale. It will, however, result in lower amount of funds for the years 2000-2011. Several major projects including interchange improvements, and rail grade separations are included in the last years of the Plan. Without additional outside funding, many of these projects will slide to later years of the program. " Anoka County Highway Department ; Five Year Plan . " . , Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs c.w. 0 00-09-00 SIGNAL PAINTING FOR 2000 2000 30,000 C.W. 0 00-04-00 2000 COLD INPLACR RECYCLING 2000 0 C.W. 0 02-030-02 FEDERAL LED REPLACEMENTS 2000 13,600 C.W. 0 02-030-03 FEDERAL BRIDGE GAURDRML AND 2000 60,000 JBAR C.W. 0 00-01-00 2000 OVERLAYS 2000 1,000,000 C.W. 0 00-02-00 2000 CRACK FILLING 2000 105,000 C.W. 0 00-03-00 2000 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 2000 50,000 C.W. 0 00-05-00 2000 SIGNALS UNASSIGNED (4) 2000 0 CSAH I 02-601-39 CHANNELIZE AT CSAH 78, $260,000 FED 2000 542,317 75,553 Coon Rapids CSAH 5 02-605-06 INTERSECTION WITH TH 47 (96-75-05) 2000 250,000 CSAH 7 97-56-07 REVISE SIGNAL AT BOB EHLEN DR. 2000 120,000 8,640 Anoka CSAH II 02-611-27 SIGNALATXEON 2000 789,638 220,895 Coon Rapids- CSAH 12 98-58-153 CSAH 153 TO CSAH 23 APOLLO 3 2000 317,464 CSAH 14 02-614-19 CSAH9TOTH 10 2000 2,200,000 CSAH 22 02-622-27 WEST CO LINE TO CSAH 83 2000 372,311 CSAH 28 98-60-28 INTERSECTION AT TH 47 2000 20,000 J 22,680 Blaine 34,560 Mn/DOT CSAH 32 02-632-10 SIGNAL AT AIRPORT ROAD 2000 208,00 116,965 Ramsey County CSAH 78 02-678-11 CSAH II (S LEG) TO CSAHI 2.42 M FED 2000 3,020,270 103,305 Coon Rapids CSAH 78 02-678-14 CSAH I TO 107TH AVE (02-601-39) 2000 0 C.R. 79 96-77-79 Signal at TH 288 2000 120,000 8,640 Anoka CSAH 83 02-683-0 I CR 63 (173rd)TO CR 64 (18Is!) 2000 471,669 C.R. 84 96-07-84 CSAHI4TOCEDARSTREET 2000 678,348 CSAH 116 99-19-116 COORlDOR STUDY TH 47 TO CSAH 56 2000 30,000 CSAH 116 02-716-03 SIGNAL & CHANN. @TH65 SP 0208-100 2000 554,000 Tuesday. AprillS.2000 - ' - - - Page 1 of1S - ?? - , . Anoka County 2000 CSAH 24 CR 103 It) ~ '" ~ :I: CR8G <( (f) u co It) co co lr :I: U I- m CSAH18 10 co 0:: .... U :I: <( (f) m U ~ 02-622-27 102-683-01 02-605-06 96-77-79 ..... 97-56-07 02-614-19 02-611-27 02-678-11 // 02-678-14 02-601-39 02-716-03 98-58-153 96-07-84 02-632-10 N W.E S - 23 - Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs · · SubTotal · . 10,952,617 PREVIOUS BALANCE ------------.$ 158,135 BOND PAYMENT -------.$ ANTICIPATED BUDGET _______.____.$ 5,965,000 FEDERAL FUNDS OBLIGATED -.----$ 2,676,216 * FEDERAL FUNDS REQUESTED .----.---$ 2 594 560 ** STATE FUNDS OBLIGATED --.-.--------$' , STATE FUNDS REQUESTED ------- -$ CITY PARTICIPATION ANTICIPATED -----$ 439,713 AJOINING COUNTY FUNDS --------.$ 116,965 BOND SALE FUNDS --------------$ ANTICIPATED YEAR END BALANCE ---.-----$ 997,972 * 02-601-39 $ 260,000 02-678-11 $2,416,216 * Turnback T .H. 288 $ 210,000 Turnback T.H. 10 $2,350,000 02-632-10 $ 34,560 Misc. Adjustments $ 121,641 Year end Balance $ 876,331 Tuesday, April IS, 2000 . .', < . Page 2 orIS - ?<; - Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs C.W. 0 01-03-00 2001 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 2001 50,000 C.W. 0 01-02-00 2001 CRACK FILLING 2001 105,000 C.W. 0 01-04-00 2001 SIGNALS UNASSIGNED (4) 2001 200,000 C.W. 0 01-05-00 2001 COLD INPLACE RECYCLING 2001 800,000 C.W. 0 01-01-00 2001 OVERLAYS 2001 1,000,000 CSAH 7 02-607-17 SIGNAL &CHANN AT 157th 29L2KFE 2001 364,000 CSAH 9 02-609-11 SIGNAL & CHANN AT 161ST 136KFED 2001 170,000 CSAH 10 02-610-10 SIGNAL AT TH 49 200K TURNBACK 2001 250,000 CSAH 10 EAST COUNTY LINR TO TH 47 2001 2,281,250 CSAH II 02-6II-28 SIGNAL & CHANN AT EGRET 348K FED 2001 6S',OW l 200,279 Blaine CSAH 17 02-617-05 CSAH #32 TO CSAH 23 (LAKE DR) 2001 239148884,976 CircleP: " 56,897 Lexingtc CSAH 17 02-617-17 CSAH 23 (LAKE DR) TO CR 10 NORTH 2001 1591000 277,434 Ramsey RD $1,130,620 Fed ' '. County CSAH 18 02-618-24 BRIDGE NO 02549 APPROACH REPAIR 2001 385,000 CSAH 35 02-635-09 81st AYE TO TH 10 FT RD S400K FED 2001 500,000 CSAH 49 02-649-0 I BRIDGE AT RICE CK S L8M TURNBACK 2001 2,000,000 CSAH 52 02-652-0 I CSAH 12 TO CSAH 14 (MAIN ST) 2001 5,500,000 1,500,000 Blaine CSAH 52 02-652-0 I PARK AND RIDE LOT (Sl.5M STATE) 2001 1,500,000 CSAH 78 02-678- I 3 INTERSECTION AT CR 18 400K FED 2001 800,000 30,000 Andovl * * SubTotal * * 20,537,738 PREVIOUS BALANCE . ----$ 876,331 BOND PAYMENT -----___$ ANTICIPATED BUDGET -______$ 6,000,000 FEDERAL FUNDS OBLIGATED _-$ 2,705,820 FEDERAL FUNDS REQUESTED --__ $1,500,000 Park & Ride STATE FUNDS OBLIGATED -_.._____$ 2,850,000 Turnback T .H. 49 STATE FUNDS REQUESTED ---_____$ CITY PARTICIPATION ANTICIPATED -..___$ 2,149,586 AJOINING COUNTY FUNDS --_______$ BOND SALE FUNDS ---.-____.__$ 4,500,000 ANTICIPATED YEAR END BALANCE ----..-----$ 43,999 Tuesday, April 18. 2000 Page 3 of18 -26- . Anoka County 2001 CSAH 24 CR 103 CR74 C"l ~ :c CR66 <( <n co () co ll'> a:: co () :c fo- 0> 10 co a:: I'- () :c <( <n 0> () CR60 ~ 02-607-17 TH 242 02-609-11 02-618-24 02-617-05 ~02-617-11 PARK AND RIDE LOT 02-610-10102-649-01 EAST CNTY L1NR TO TH 47 02-635-09 N W+E S _ ?7 _ , - Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs C.W. 0 02-05-00 2002 SIGNALS (4 UNASSIGNED) 2002 200,000 C.W. 0 02-01-00 2002 OVERLAYS 2002 1,000,000 C.W. 0 02-02-00 2002 CRACK SEALING 2002 105,000 C.W. 0 02-04-00 2002 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 2002 50,000 C.W. 0 02-03-00 2002 COLD INPLACE RECYCLING 2002 800,000 CSAH 14 96-68-14 CORIDOR STUDY ACCESS CONTROL 2002 1,200,000 $960,000 Fed CSAH 17 02-617-13 CSAH 14 TO 1000 FT N. OF CSAH 12 2002 2,000,000 50,000 Blain~ $1,600,000 Fed CSAH 17 02-617-12 PHEASENT RIDGE TO 1000'N OF CSAH 2002 1,474,748 25,000 BlainE 12 $849,380 Fed CSAH 49 S CO. LINE TO CSAH 23 $5.4M TURNBK 2002 5,400,000 CSAH 52 02-652-03 INTERCHANGE AT 35W 95TH to 2002 5,350,000 350,000 BlainE HAMLINE CSAH 52 02-652-02 CSAH 12 TO 0.28 MLS EAST OF IOlst 2002 2,750,000 570,000 BlainE CSAH 52 02-652-04 .28 MEOF IOIstTO 95TH AVE 2002 900,000 80,000 BlainE *. SubTotal * * 21,229,748 PREVIOUS BALANCE --------$ 43,999 BOND PAYMENT - -.$ ANTICIPATED BUDGET $ 6,000,000 FEDERAL FUNDS OBLIGATED ..~ $ 3,409,380 FEDERAL FUNDS REQUESTED $ STATE FUNDS OBLlGATED- $ 5,400,000 Turnback T.H. 49 STATE FUNDS REQUESTED --____$ 5,000,000 1-35W @ 95th CITY PARTICIPATION ANTICIPATED _____$ 1,075,000 AJOINING COUNTY FUNDS ---__$ BOND SALE FUNDS -------____$ ANTICIPATED YEAR END BALANCE ----_$ -301,369 Tucsday.'AprillS:2000 , , Page 4 of18 _ ?ll _ . r ...... ..... .'....., Anoka County 2002 -;..."..;~:,r..;lI:i.~lln':';~I~;.o.~~.u;.:;m,'~~~'\,WA'.>:\'t"lI;:"~~~,=,,>,~.I2~l' '~-~'.3"~ "J ~ CR 76 '~1I/ ~ ; , i -, , ::.; ~ ~ " CR 103 " '1 ';j .' ) ~ "'CR74 '" , .' ,\ ... :~ 1, ,,,' :r "CR 86 ~- < .J . U) ,~ i on ~~ '1, ,^.J '; 10 ~ U> ,: '~_...f j: 4! ,j ^' r~",~ ~ 'F':~''::~';;i';i..JO.'C'$......;;v~....~~"nvor:..:;e:,~OI;.~-.;:;~~~i I ,._,../' ~ ,.r"~. .1 ,4 <>f-; \'$ia:J!':r.:.~li:I!~~I.:, m ,.j CSAH 18 It: ~ ..Jo 0 :r < CI) 0 Cl - ,! ~ ~ ~ J ,';t ~ . ,~;~ )1 ~ ... " .~ ~ ~ ~, ~ .~ [t ~. ;l 96-68-14 S CO. LINE TO CSAH 23 02-617-13/02-617-12 N 02-652-04/ w.' 02-652-021 02-652-03 s - 29 - . ~ Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs C.W. 0 03-02-00 2003 CRACK SEALING 2003 105,000 C.W. 0 03-04-00 2003 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 2003 50,000 C.W. 0 03-01-00 2003 OVERLAYS 2003 1,000,000 C.W. 0 03-03-00 2003 COLD INPLACE RECYCLING 2003 800,000 C.W. 0 03-05-00 2003 SIGNAL SYSTEMS (4) 2003 200,000 CSAH I INTERSECTION REPL. @ EGRET 2003 500,000 SO.4MHES CSAH 3 REPL. SIGNAL @ CSAH 3/51/10 SO.4M 2003 500,000 CSAH 9 INTERSECTION @ I 57TH SO.32M HES 2003 800,000 CSAH 9 02-609-12 0.39 M. NOFCR 116 -149thAVE 2003 2,457,914 180,000 Andovel CSAH II 99-76-11 HANSON INTERCHANGE WITH TH 10 2003 1,000,000 DE/RW C.R. 16 97-74-16 SIGNAL AT TH 65$0.4M HES 2003 500,000 CSAH 17 02-617-15 CSAH 14 TO 149TH AVE 2003 3,307,412 50,000 Blaine CSAH 23 INTERSECTION @ CR 105 S0.36M HES 2003 600,000 CSAH 23 CSAH 49 TO I-35W PE,DE,R/W 600K TV 2003 600,000 CSAH 116 INTERSECTION @ THURSTON SO.4M 2003 500,000 HES CSAH 116 INTERSECTION @ JEFFERSON SO.4M 2003 800,000 HES * * SubTotal * * 13,720,326 " PREVIOUS BALANCE -----$ -301,369 BOND PAYMENT ---$ ANTICIPATED BUDGET -- -$ 6,500,000 FEDERAL FUNDS OBLIGATED --..,..--$ FEDERAL FUNDS REQUESTED -$ STATE FUNDS OBLIGATED -$ 2,680,000 HES STATE FUNDS 1l~19}i~ltl!ilS ---------$ 600,000 Turnback CITY PARTICIPATION ANTICIPATED -----$ 230,000 AJOINING COUNTY FUNDS ---.----$ BOND SALE FUNDS - -$ ANTICIPATED YEAR END BALANCE ...---$ -4,011,695 Tuesday. AprillS..2000 '. ' .Page 5 uUS - 30 - . . n... .__..___ Anoka County 2003 ,r~,.'lm'~~~I';;' '~'~.;7ll.;(V~.H.-:. ,:"~~""~~'~~=., ,;r::~~\--c.."<'~";'<I!l!l$.~:~.' ~l .r't}" CSAH 241.,.,1 'S,1 " ff. CR 103 :j r "CR74" .., J - ~i /' ~.:- :I: '1CR86 . < :1,,: en l( 0 f,-; II) ~"-~...t..,t ., I:. :r :1 I- \1 ~~ ~'!f\ ! ,J ,1 ._,.....".~ ~ ~..".,.~~~tw.~-""y:I,;;; -'It" m " CSAH 18 co lr .... ,~) 0 :r < en Ol 0 - 's1~~f/~ 02-609-12 f\ 1 ''11."\.:\.,,,,, fJ' ~ INTERSECTION @ THURSTO~.i\ :1 .1- , '\. , " ~-!.:~':1 ., !j INTERSECTION @ 157TH 7'" ,. " !i d INTERSECTION REPL @ EGRET it: ;:l ~~11:;~:~J "~if' \ INTERSECTION @ JEFFERSON ., 97-74-16 02-617-15 INTERSECTION @ CR 105 REPL SIGNAL @ CSAH 3/51/10 N w*. S - 31 - . ~ Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs C.W. 0 04-02-00 2004 CRACK SEALING 2004 105,000 C.W. 0 04-04-00 2004 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 2004 50,000 C.W. 0 04-03-00 2004 COLD INPLACE RECYCLING 2004 800,000 C.W. 0 04-01-00 2004 OVERLAYS 2004 1,000,000 C.W. 0 04-05-00 2004 SIGNALS 2004 220,000 CSAH 11 99-76-11 HANSON INTERCHANGE WITH TH 10 2004 1,000,000 RfW CSAH 23 CSAH 49 TO I-35W DE,RfW, 600K TURNB .2004 600,000 CSAH 78 RAIL GRADE SEPERATION 2004 1,500,000 (DESIGNIRW) .. SubTotal.. 5,275,000 PREVIOUS BALANCE --- -$ -4,011,695 BOND PAYMENT- -- -$ ANTICIPATED BUDGET -$ 6,500,000 FEDERAL FUNDS OBLIGATED ----$ FEDERAL FUNDS REQUESTED - -$ STATE FUNDS OBLIGATED- ---$ 600,000 Turnback STATE FUNDS REQUESTED ----$ CITY PARTICIPATION ANTICIPATED ----$ AJOINING COUNTY FUNDS $ BOND SALE FUNDS - $ ANTICIPATED YEAR END BALANCE ___$:2, 186, 695 Tuesday, April 18, 2000 ,,' . ,Page 6 of IS " - 32 - . - . Anoka County 2004 CSAH 24 CR 103 CR74 (') :I: CR86 <l: Vl U co It> co co 0:: i= u '" It> co a:: .... u :I: <l: Vl '" u R60 - CSAH 116 TH 242 .... :I: <l: Vl U ,.. N W*E s - 33 - . ~ . Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs C.W. 0 05-05-00 2005 SIGNALS 2005 220,000 C.W. 0 04-01-00 2005 OVERLAYS 2005 1,000,000 C.W. 0 05-04-00 2005 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 2005 50,000 C.W. 0 05-02-00 2005 CRACK SEALING 2005 105,000 C.W. 0 05-03-00 2005 COLD IN PLACE RECYCLING 2005 800,000 CSAH 11 99-76-11 HANSON INTERCHANGE W TH 10 5,5M 2005 10,000,000 FED CSAH 23 CSAH 49 TO I-35W ($3.IM TURNBACK) 2005 3,100,000 CSAH 23 INTERCHANGE WITH I-35W DESIGN 2005 482,500 CSAH 32 02-632-11 INTERCHANGE WITH I-35W DESIGN 2005 1,060,000 CSAH 78 RAIL GRADE SEPERA nON NEED 3.6M F 2005 4,500,000 · · SubTotal' . 21,317,500 PREVIOUS BALANCE $ -2,186,695 BOND PAYMENT ----------$ ANTICIPATED BUDGET -------$ 6,500,000 FEDERAL FUNDS OBLIGATED ----------$ FEDERAL FUNDS REQUESTED ----------$ 9,100,000 STATE FUNDS OBLIGATED ------$ 3,100,000 Turnback STATE FUNDS REQUESTED -----$ CITY PARTICIPATION ANTICIPATED -----$ AJOINING COUNTY FUNDS ---------$ BOND SALE FUNDS --------------$ ANTICIPATED YEAR END BALANCE ____$-4,804,195 Tuesday. April 18. 2000 , . ;>, '-" ,', .~, ':. . . - ^ ~'. , " . '. ' ' . ,:Page ,7 ons ~. ,. . Anoka County 2005 CSAH 24 CR 103 CR 74 .., J: CR86 ;;; 0 <0 It> <0 <0 oc f= 0 0> II) co oc ,... 0 J: <( C/l 0 CSAH 116 TH 242 ,... J: <( C/l 0 HANSON INTERCHANGE W TH 10 RAIL GRADE SEPARATION NEED N - 35 - W*E - . Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs C.W. 0 06-01-00 2006 OVERLAYS 2006 1,000,000 C.W. 0 06-02-00 2006 CRACK SEALING 2006 105,000 C.W. 0 06-03-00 2006 COLD IN PLACE RECYCLING 2006 800,000 C.W. 0 06-04-00 2006 BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 2006 50,000 C.W. 0 04-05-00 2006 SIGNALS 2006 220,000 CSAH 23 CSAH 49 TO 1-35W CONST2,$J.JM 2006 1,100,000 TURNB CSAH 23 02-623- 13 INTERCHANGE WITH I-35W 2006 6,517,500 1,000,000 Line 5.5 m Fed Lak( CSAH 32 INTERCHANGE WITH I-35W TO CSAH 23 2006 5,940,000 500,000 Ram, 5.5 m Fed Com .. SubTotal .. 15,732,500 PREVIOUS BALANCE $ -4,804,195 BOND PAYMENT ---------$ ANTICIPATED BUDGET- . -$ 6,500,000 FEDERAL FUNDS OBLIGATED ------$ FEDERAL FUNDS REQUESTED $ 11,000,000 STATE FUNDS OBLIGATED -------$ 1,100,000 Turnback STATE FUNDS REQUESTED ... $ CITY PARTICIPATION ANTICIPATED--$ 1,000,000 AJOINING COUNTY FUNDS -$ 500,000 BOND SALE FUNDS-- --$ ANTICIPATED YEAR END BALANCE --- $ -436,695 -. Tuesday, A.priI18. 2000 -. Page 8 of18 7" . " L Anoka County 2006 CR76 CR 103 ~ CR74 '" :r CRB6 <( C/l 0 co It> co co :r cr t- o CSAH1B 0> II) ::e 0:: 0 :r <( 0> C/l ~ 0 ... CSAH 49 TO 1-35W INTERCHANGE WITH 1-35W TO CSAH 23 INTERCHANGE WITH 1-35W N W*E - 37 - S . ,. .- PART 3 OTHER PROJECTS . '. - 39 - . ,.. \..4 Introduction to Part 3 Other Proiects The category "Other Projects" includes two lists. The first list has a year of "2010" assigned to it. These projects have either been requested by the municipality in which the road segment is found, or was included in a previous letter of commitment to the Metropolitan Council for reconstruction prior to 2010. This list consists of $68,255,668 in Engineer's Estimate and cannot be funded prior to 2007 with current funding levels. The second part of Part 3 "Other Projects" is projects, which have been designated by the year "OTIIR" and have been identified as projects needing reconstruction for capacity or safety reasons. These projects total $111,423,431. These routes will likely require preservation maintenance prior to the time when reconstruction dollars will be available for them. _ A 1 _ " ., . Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs CSAH 1 IN FRIDLEY 2010 500,000 CSAH 1 REISLING TO CSAH 78 (HANSON) 2010 9,176,992 CSAH 1 HANSON TO 93RD LN (TH 610) 2010 6,882,744 C.R. 10 LEXINGTON TO CR 53 2010 1,441,018 CSAH 11 FROM HANSON TO SAND CREEK 2010 1,228,957 CSAH 14 02-614-13 I35W TO E COUNTI LINE 2010 6,772,785 CSAH 17 02-617-16 149TH AVE TO CSAH 18 2010 3,414,102 CSAH 17 OLD CR 80 TO CSAH 22 2010 10,815,740 CSAH 32 CSAH 49 TO CSAH 21 (37.5 % RAMSEY 2010 3,627,484 CSAH 51 110th to TH 242 2010 4,424,245 CSAH 51 02-651-03 92ND AVE NW TO COON RPDS BLVD 2010 1,638,749 TH10 CSAH 57 TH 10 TO CSAH 116 2010 1,638,749 CSAH 78 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT AT CR 2010 800,000 16 CSAH 78 85-15-78 C,R. 58 TO CSAH 22 2010 1,600,361 CSAH 116 0.11 MWOFTH47TOCR57 2010 1,600,361 CSAH 116 CSAH 78 TO TH 65 2010 8,356,908 C.R. 116 C.R.56 TO CSAH/CR 57 2010 1,386,979 C,R. 132 CSAH 1 TO TH 47 2010 2,949,497 · · SubTotal.. 68,255,668 PREVIOUS BALANCE -.--------$ BOND PAYMENT $ ANTICIPATED BUDGET --------$ FEDERAL FUNDS OBLIGATED $ FEDERAL FUNDS REQUESTED $ STATE FUNDS OBLIGATED ----$ STATE FUNDS REQUESTED -----$ CITY PARTICIPATION ANTICiPATED -----$ AJOINING COUNTY FUNDS --.----$ BOND SALE FUNDS -.------..---....$ ANTICIPATED YEAR END BALANCE ..--.-.--$ Tuesday, April 18, 2000 ' ' , , ' '. " c'" '.:' Page 9of18 _ II? _ . ..' . .\ ."4 ...... . '..,.,.. Anoka County 2010 CR 103 :~ / I', 74 '" - ~~~: ~ CI) 0 .~;;1 In ~ CQ ~ J 1 , .' ')I~~~..w-.t.I.'<t.1:!f'':iF'>!'~l,Uo~.~~7:~:J \ " \ ',1 ~ OLD CR 80 TO CS .: 22 .~! ~ CSAH 18 \>o~ 0> 60 - .~' - .... :I: < CI) 0 0.11 M W OF THE 47 TO CR 57 ji I FROM HANSON '''''<<~.;, TO SAND CREEK t'\.; REISLlNG TO CSAH 78 (HANSON) ~'.,~" ,; 1 HANSON TO 93RD LN (610) '\ LEXINGTON TO CR 53 CSAH 49 TO CSAH 21 92ND AVE NW TO COON RPDS BLVD TH 10 CR 132 (TH47 TO CSAH 1) N W.E IN FRIDLEY' ( .. - 43 - S ..,' I. f Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs C.W. 0 CRACK FILLING (SI05,OOO PER YEAR) OTHR 1,575,000 C.W. 0 SIGNALS UNASSIGNED (4/YEAR) OTHR 3,300,000 C.W. 0 OVERLAYS SI,OOO,OOO/YEAR OTHR 15,000,000 C.W. 0 BRlDGE MAINTENANCE OTHR 750,000 C.W. 0 99.63-00 RAMSEY IDA YTON RlVER CROSSING OTHR C.W. 0 COLD INPLACE RECYCLING S800000/YR OTHR 12,000,000 CSAH 1 CSAH 7 TO CSAH 14 (MAIN ST) OTHR 1,152,814 CSAH 5 CSAH 24 TO HILLENDALE OTHR 2,209,405 CSAH 6 INTERSECTION AT TH 65 OTHR 300,000 CSAH 7 CSAH 1 TO CSAH 14 OTHR 1,008,713 CSAH 7 141STTOCR58 OTHR 2,240,505 CSAH 9 149th A VB TO N LEG CSAH 20 OTHR 1,920,433 CSAH 11 CSAH 78 TO RA VBN ST OTHR 983,249 CSAH 11 CSAH 12 TO.5 MI. E OF CSAH 78 OTHR 2,161,527 CSAH 12 CSAH 17 TO CR 53 (SUNSET) OTHR 934,748 CSAH 12 SUNSET RD FROM CSAH 12 TO APOLO OTHR 144,102 DR CSAH 14 INTERCHANGE AT I-35W OTHR 4,500,000 CSAH 14 94-10-14 INTERCHANGE AT I-35W PLANNING OTHR 360,000 , CSAH 17 CSAH 18 TO OLD CR 80 OTHR 1,274,657 C.R. 18 91-09-18 ANDOVER BLVD. TO CSAH 78 OTHR 1,104,702 CSAH 21 SO. COUNTY LINE TO CSAH 14 OTHR 2,464,336 CSAH 22 CR 65 TO CSAH 5 OTHR 1,274,657 CSAH 22 CR64 TO CR65 OTHR 1,699,542 CSAH 23 CSAH 14 TO CSAH 19 OTHR 2,719,267 CSAH 23 CR 105 TO CSAH 17 (LEXINGTON) OTHR 3,195,288 CSAH 23 #17 TO CSAH 49 OTHR 3,686,871 CSAH 23 CSAH 19 TO 1-35 OTHR 2,719,267 Tuesday;,April18,'2000," ,'" , ' ' " ^ ~--~-,~- ' Page 16 of18 - 44 - . to _., '-'~ '..".. ,"- Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs CSAH 23 S COUNTY LINE TO LAKE DRIVE OTHR 432,305 CSAH 23 I-35W TO CSAH 14 OTHR 1,280,288 CSAH 24 TH 47 TO CSAH 28 OTHR 864,611 CSAH 30 TH 47 TH CSAH 7 OTHR 864,611 CSAH 36 CR 77 TO NORTH COUNTY LINE OTHR 1,869,496 C.R. 52 CSAH 116 TO CR 61 OTHR 1,699,542 CSAH 52 MAIN ST TO CSAH 116 OTHR 1,722,029 C.R, 58 CSAH 9 TO CSAH 18 OTHR 4,248,855 C.R. 58 CSAH 7 TO CSAH 9 OTHR 3,399,084 C.R. 64 CSAH 83 TO CSAH 5 OTHR 2,294,382 C.R. 65 WEST COUNTY LINE TO CSAH 22 OTHR ' 424,886 C.R. 71 INTERSECTION WITH CSAH 28 OTHR 400,000 CSAH 78 02-678-07 TH 242 TO 1000' N OF BUNKER LK BLVD OTHR 4,178,454 CSAH 78 N JCT CSAH 11 TO TH 242 OTHR 2,457,914 C.R. 79 1900 FT SW OF CSAH 9 TO TH 288 OTHR 918,415 C.R. 103 CSAH 13 TO CSAH 26 OTHR 2,549,313 C.R. 105 LAKE DRIVE TO CSAH 52 (95 TH AVE) OTHR 1,441,018 CSAH 116 TH 65 TO CSAH 17 OTHR 3,144,153 ., GR. 140 CSAH 14 TO CSAH 21 OTHR 6,554,994 "" SubTotal"" 111,423,431 PREVIOUS BALANCE --------------$ BOND PAYMENT -------------------$ ANTICIPATED BUDGET ------------$ FEDERAL FUNDS OBLIGATED ------------$ FEDERAL FUNDS REQUESTED ---------------$ STATE FUNDS OBLIGATED ---------------$ STATE FUNDS REQUESTED -----------------$ CITY PARTICIPATION ANTICIPATED -------$ AJOINING COUNTY FUNDS -----------------$ BOND SALE FUNDS -----------------------$ ANTICIPATED YEAR END BALANCE ---------$ Tuesday~.ApriI18. 2000 . , Page 1701"18 A~ .- " . Project Description Year Engineers City Number Estimate Costs * * SubTotal * * 429,879,796 TuesdaYi April 18, 2000 Page 18 oB8 . , . ., . MULTI MODAL. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM TRANSPORTATION IN * COMMUTER RAIL ANOKA COUNTY * ANOKA COUNTY TRAVELER YOUR * TRAILS AND W ALKW A YS HIGHWAY FOR THE * METRO TRANSIT FUTURE * AIRPORT . HIGHWAY FUNCTIONAL CLASS . PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 9.09 miles . MINOR ARTERIAL "A" 119.27 miles . MINOR ARTERIAL "B" 115.94 miles . COLLECTORS 147,72 miles . LOCAL ROADS 28.50 miles MNDOT TURNBACKS DELETIONS FROM COUNTY SYSTEM . TH 49 LINO LAKES . CSAH II COON RAPIDS . TH 10 COON RAPIDS ABOUT 2000 . CR 10 BLAINE . TH 288 IN ANOKA D 1 .- .. .. . ADDITIONAL DELETIONS HIGHWAYS AND STREETS BEING PURSUED . CR 110 LEXINGTON AND CIRCLE . INTERSTATES 23.23 M 2.54% PINES . US HIGHWAYS 19.44M 0,60% . CR 81 STFRANCIS . MN T.H 58.83 M 0,75% . CSAH'S 275.59 M 0.91 % . MSAS 227.43 M 9.07% . CTY ROADS 140.71 M 0.93% . TOWNSHIP 1041.88 M 2.01 % . MUNICIPAL 1911.43 M 12.88 % INDICATORS AVERAGE ADT . co AVERAGE CSAH ADT 5921 . ANOKA CO AVERAGE C.R. ADT 1538 . STATE . PERCENT OF ALL VMT ON CSAH 26.9 . METRO .' PERCENT OF ALL VMT ON C.R. 3.9 G:lANOKA . ONLY 70 % OF THE STATE AVERAGE. STATE FUNDED MILES . ONLY 50.5% OF VMT ON STATE ROADS VEHICLE MILES TRA VEL~D MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION over1ayed,on AND POPULATION CONSTRUCTION DOLLARS over1ayed on STATE AID ._~-- 512.000.000 =wmnnlrl I $10,000,000 ..000.000) j n,OOll,OOO $04,000,000 . 278000 I ","'''' 7,"'.'" I ;,: I3,OOD,lllllI. 25OCOO ...ooa.ooa J ~:::: 225000 . 54,ooo.ooa "OClO,oool $2,000,000 so 200000 ~ so . 1,000,000 n~~HIHU H!HUUU _s....,I,.. I_ConolruCllonCDlla'I v.nIcleMII..T.........1 ... .U_V-""=1Io R.".w.1loIl P-" 2 - 48 - . " , ..".0 Philosophy Types of Roadways . Preserve . FULL SECTION - PRESERVE . Manage . DEFICIENT SECTION - PRESERVE . Improve . DEFICIENT SECTION - 5 YEAR PLAN . Expand . DEFICIENT SECTION - 20 YEAR PLAN ~. STRATEGIES FOR Current Preservation Funding PRESERVATION ROUTES . OVERLAY - $3120 1ft/mile . Cold inplace Recycling - $800,000 per year . COLD IN PLACE RECYCLING - $ 2900 . Overlays Including Milling - $1,000,000 per year 1ft/mile . Crack Sealing - $105,000 per year . CRACK SEALING - $150 1ft/mile . Bridge Maintenance - $50,000 per year plus lit special proj ects Full Section Preserve . Rebuilt in the last 20 years Deficient Section - 20 Year Plan . Sufficient for projected traffic . High Volume - High Priority . 162 miles - 39 %ofsystem . Maintain until Reconstructed Deficient Section Preserve . Deficient Cross Section 'No improvement since paved . Expansion Type Projects 'Comparatively low volume . 111 miles - 29% of the system . $278 million in deficiencies ~ '148 miles - 35 % of system . $ 14 million per year '$142 million dollars in deficiencies 3 - /1q - ,.. .. . The Plan Deficient Section - 5 Year Plan . Strong Preservation Component . Bonding to Help Move some major Projects . Highest Priorities - Highest Volume forward . Maintain Until Reconstructed - . Strong Commitment to Lexington A venue . Deficient Cross Section and Radisson road Corridors . Expansion . Aggressive funding strategies. . $82 million in Est. Project Costs . Interchange Improvements at: . $16.4 million per Year - Main Street and 111 10 under construction . $ 61 million identified - 95th Avenue at 1-35W being designed . $ 21 million unmet at this time - Lake Drive and 1-35W - Hanson Blvd and 111 10 Anoka County .-- .- --- 2000 Anoka County 2001 .2008 Highway Improvement Plan . ~- .-t. -".- '_'N~ --~-- ..-.- . , Anoka County Anoka County 2001 2002 -- .t. -- ..1__ 4 - 50 - 4 . . ~ -- .~,. .... .-.,'. ",".,-.;" ..,....,... n-,',,,. Anoka County Anoka County 2003 2005 -t. Anoka County Anoka County 2006 2010 . ___tollOOMllI'OIaWlM. --to -- .~ . -, MAJOR CHALLENGES 12 . MAJOR STAFFING ISSUIlS I. ...- ~-_. . PROVIDING OVERSITE FOR A ......... ..- . .... .0.. . GREATLY EXPANDED PROGRAM ! . INCREASED DEMAND FOR . 0 .-...- Q TRANSPORTATION , ..----" -.. .. . IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMUTER --'" -"''' RAIL WITH 10 IMPROVEMENTS AND 2 -..--- " ADDITIONAL RlVER CROSSINGS I . . STABLE AND ADDITIONAL FUNDING 1991 1992 1993 199" 1995 Hl98 1997 1998 1999 FOR HIGHWAYS Aasfl$led ValUll n Bllio... .. ..L8\')'hMilliol'lll _ . . ACHO State Aid h Mlllons _ .. Tot;il Slate AId'" HU"dmd M1DJons 5 - ~, - ~, . , . FI;III'C 2. AU States Median Gal Tax per GollnG.-l910..1998 FUNDING LEVEL TRENDS ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1987.2000 -.....---. Oollars Per Year Per Person (Adjusted to 19_ Oolars) ..- " .. ................ " ~-(:=1.. -!-~-=-~ 7. r" -~----~'- ,. .. ---i .-'.,:--------.--~.~.=::-~O-A_ -~.:-.';'".._........:-:.';'".... _._- 3D -'. ~'r .....,-.--:..~. 2. ________'...__"".'_ ,. .# ...<1' ..4>q ..." ...~... ...r# ~~ ....; I' ...#' ....J- ...~'b ...q~ ~ ~::~- -- --- ..-- \:-... LoealElfllr Per MalArV.hide - - Total E,otPlfMOIOrVlhidll ..... .TolllIEflO!'tPIl'C.p1t1i LOCIIlEIfattP.,Capltro Source: Minnesota Taxpayers Association Fiscal Focus, Aug. 1999 FJ~re 3.. MlnDesobl..,s Gas Tax per Vehicle 1\-UJe .-..Iy_................... Contacts: Highways Jon Olson 763-862-4213 Linden Robjent 763-862-4237 Commuter Rail Tim Y,nlos 763-323-5700 .~ .- .- ,- Anok, County Traveler .- Tim Kirchoff 763-422-7088 Recreational Trails Source: Minnesota Taxpayers Association John VonDeLinde 763-767-2860 Fisc,l Focus, Aug. 1999 . 6 -- DATE May 2. 2000 O~~\ ~. ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL . Planning & Zoning Minutes - April 11 , 2000 . Special City Council Minutes - April 18, 2000 . City Council Minutes - April 18, 2000 . Special City Council Minutes - April 24, 2000 . Ord. No. 255 . Chesterton Commons North 2nd Addition Sketch Plan . Harstad Companies Sketch Plan . Schedule of Bills PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT AGENDA. THANK YOU. , - 0" J CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 255 AN INTERIM ORDINANCE REGULATING THE USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF ANDOVER FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROTECTING THE PLANNING PROCESS AND THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITY. The City Council of the City of Andover does hereby ordain: Section 1. Le!!islative Findin!!s of Fact. The City of Andover, Minnesota, a predominantly residential community has sustained considerable urban residential development. On March 6, 2000, the City Council adopted housing goals for the City of Andover as required by the Metropolitan Council as a part of the updating of the Andover Comprehensive Plan. The housing goals provide for a substantial increase in the number of multi-family housing units within the City over the next ten years. The City Council of the City of Andover has committed to the integration and implementation. of the housing goals within the Andover Comprehensive Plan. Based on this commitment, the City Council deems it necessary to study, prepare and recommend for hearing and adoption new and amended ordinances, policies and regulations which are necessary measures for effectuating the Comprehensive Plan. The City finds that unless reasonable measures are taken for a reasonable interim period to protect the public interest by preserving the integrity of said plan until the appropriate amendments to ordinances, policies and regulations are adopted it will destroy the integrity of the Comprehensive Plan and its basic purpose, need and effect. Section i. Le!!islative Intent. It is the intention of the City Council to protect the Comprehensive Plan, proposed amendments thereto, and their implementation by hereby adopting, pursuant to the authority vested in the Council by Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355 an interim ordinance for a reasonable time during consideration of the aforementioned Comprehensive Plan, proposed amendments, ordinances, policies and regulations for the City, to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the community. / - - .. Page Two Interim Ordinance April 18, 2000 Section 3. Affected Area: supersedes. This Ordinance shall apply to and govern all lands within the City for the purpose of protecting the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of the City for a period of one year from the date of adoption. Those properties in which preliminary plats have been approved by the City Council that provide for multi-family housing units shall be allowed to develop and shall be exempt from the moratorium provided the preliminary plat was approved prior to April 18, 2000. This ordinance, during its effective period, shall replace and supersede provisions in all other ordinances and regulations applicable to the City of Andover which are in conflict or inconsistent with the provisions herein. All ordinances and provisions therein which are not in conflict with the terms and conditions of this ordinance shall continue in full force and effect. \ Section 4. Scope of Control. Except as hereinafter provided in this ordinance, during the period of April 18. 2000 through April 18. 2001: Neither the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover or the City Council shall review sketch plans or grant any preliminary plat approval to a subdivision of multi-family housing in excess of two units per building. Nor shall said Commission or Council review sketch plans or grant any preliminary plat approval to a subdivision of multi-family housing that exceeds a density of four units per acre. Section 5. Penalties. Any person, firm, entity, or corporation who violates any provisions of this ordinance shall be subject to the penalties and enforcement provisions set forth in Ordinance No. 10, Section 18 of the City of Andover. . / Page Three Interim Ordinance April 18, 2000 Section 6. Validity. The validity of any word, sentence, section, clause, paragraph, part or provision of this ordinance shall not affect the validity of any other part of this ordinance which can be given effect without such invalid part or parts. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon adoption and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 18th day of Amil, 2000. CITY OF ANDOVER I , ATTEST: /Lt,A~ d~ Victoria V olk, City Clerk -' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date May 02, 2000 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEP ARTMEN Amended Approval of Claims Finance Jim Dickinso I ITEM NO. Schedule of Bills I REQUEST: - The Andover City Council is requested to approve total claims in the amount of $ 683,738.55 . BACKGROUND: Claims totaling $109,676.38 on disbursement edit list #1 dated 04-25-2000 have been issued and released. Claims totaling $574,062.17 on disbursement edit list #2 dated 05-02-2000 will be issued and released upon Council approval. Date: 05-02-2000 Approved By: > . " " .. .. If. II- II- It 0," 0 3: 3: tll:::l tl C ,'" . . . ...'" ", , , , , , , '.. '" '0 . . .....n 0 000000 ,.., [@ 0 . . to t'tl'H ~ot>.r:a.~... '.. ~ . . ...., " , t-.)Nt<JNNN , , " . . .....H m 0'\ o UlU1U1U1 ," " . . toZ 0,"" NNNNNN 'to '" m . . gil; .... ~ 000000 , , 0 . . . .....'0 000000 'H C '"' . . on to, n 000000 ,'" '0 . . . H "'. " , , , , , , , n . . 0[:: ....... t-l ~. (DCDCOCO(D(D , " . . o 0 NNNNt..)N , ~. . . '" 0 , 0\ 0 U1....N... , 0 . . .. m m 0 , . . ...... g.. 000000 ,'" ... .. . . ...m ...........Il:ooll:o '.. to . . .. .., 0'0 ..................................... ,.., '" . . "'" .... ~. r..>NNt.JNN '.. 0 . . "'3 . O\OO"lVlU1t1't , 0 . . m .................................... ,n It It It.... It- 000000 0 . . .., 000000 3 It.......... .. 0 3 n . . ~ ~~"'''''''''' ~ 0 It '" .. .. .. It a HHHH ~ . . (IlOOtf:l[1) . . '" c:ttlttllIllIl ~ .. 0000 It ~ [::[::~~HHi . . m ~. . . n , tr.ltr.ltr.l[J) .....r:o..... ... "" " gg~!gl~ . . . . . . 0- ~ ~~U~!.'l ............................. If. 0 . . .... '" ?';~1-38 8 0 . . . ,"0 tr.ltt:ltoU1tr.l , ... It N N N Nit .... ..... . . 0 0- , to . . " '" otlnUlU"lU"l .. m ..... . . '" '0 0 . . ~. m. 0 ............................ .. .... 0 . . H . '" . . m H ..ooco.. m . . t' '" . . "'''' ~ .. 0 0 0 0.. H . . m . . '" .. It ... .. .. .. t' 3 . . o ~. '" ........... .. "', Z . . "'. .., .. It .. .. .. lI- "" m " . . t't' . . "'0 n . . ...'" H'" . ~ . 00 OH . . ",m . . , . . < . . on . . "'H . . .., . . 0'" . -- . 0 . . 0 . . n.., . . ~il; . . . . . . "'''' . . ~5J . . 4;' ,,'" '"'" . 1:; 1:; 1:; ~ !; !; !; )> )> )> )> 1:; )> t;J 0'" H H n g ...'" 0 0 0 .. .. .. 2: '" 0> .. .. z .....n i:i "i:i "t'~ .. '" '" '" 8 H 0 '" '" H H H )>1;; H8 ~s;o~ 0> .. 0 "'''' ~~8 00> ~~ O>~ 8~ toCllo:lZ zo '" 0'" .....H ",n ?;i',;'" ..0 ~ [,Jz "!iiC:: 1'it;J ~SJh l;!r:: H" .. "Z 00 "z ~ N" h O>Z :51:; gg~ ~!ii tHl~ ....... " '" " ::lliJ O>Nt' ~~ "0 !J!; 135: !2~ 3" ," "'.... 0> l\J~ 1;;>: on "'::l .. >:la ~i t;;SJ HI-I~~ '" H" H "''''... ::l ...... "0 ".. ::l~)> ~~ "1;; "'.. " 01: .... OOt' ZZ .. )>t' Z s;n "'.. Ht' .. 88lil ..~ 0>'" "H ..n "H t'.. H .. .. "''''.. .. ..n fi~ ..~ t'" n SJ~ "'.. t'O> ~ .. 0> EJ"'n ~ .... ~ ~~ "'>: ~?';liln ~ ..- '0> ...... 00 ""'" ?;" .. QH '" "'0> HH'" , )>)>~ H'" "'0 ~~ ;J"no " '" 00> .. .. ZZo '" HH .. g~ ..'" ..1;; ..'" ~ ..... nz r w.. "".. w "'''' "" fIltrJl't1'tl ;j t'n ::1 "'''' '" '" .. '" ~O> 00> " 'C::80 H' "'''' '" .... .. 0)> ~g .. O>H i:l .. .. Z H .... 66E: H ..0> ..1;; z !iiE;?;.. " ...n .... '" 3 0>0> "'H )> .. 0>0> !ii "'''' '" H H 0> O>H" 0> 0> ~ !l ~ .,Z)> ..... .. i:l H" ... ;g 0> 0> Z 0 '" .. .. 0 H WHH ::- ~ '" '" H W H H !I:o!\,)-.JW '" eo "'.... 1.0 .. !; "'H" '" H"'''' .. ... '" '" W ~\O\OU"I '" ....:I 0\ W...J .. "'.... '" "'W'" ... .. 0 H '" ...l.0\1IiOU"I 0 1-'\00...... '" '" 0 "''''0 ... 000 .. 0 0 0 .. 0\ \0 \D..,J 0 l.n0'l-...l.... 0 ... ~ 000 '" WWo 0 0 0 0 W O\~G)O\ 0 ~""U"Ia\ 0 .. . . . . ~"'''' E <:"'''' 0 0 0 " '" c::::::o:a::o .. ~oo::o n .., )> .... !;!.... .. " c:: !;! !;! !;!...... .. "".. ~ .. n nn "" " .. .. """ ~ ...." t' n 000 .. 0>)> ~ ~ 0> .. ~ t:l>O>>' 8i:li:le:: .. 0 liJEJEJ 0> OHH ..... ~ OHHH " ~ "''''''' '" ::o::tl::o::o 0 ::0 8 I..no ~ HH .......... ..... H .. 0> ............... t' HH..... ~ 0> ..zz "iiSiiS '" z " ~iiSiiSiiS 8 ~~~iiS 0 0"" ::JHH .. " H 0 .. ~ " .., 0 0> '" I-3Hl-IH ... .., H m 1:"'''' 1:~~ " 0> .., '" r=:~~~ r=:~~~ Q. .... fJ ~ H c:: .. ~ .... .. n " '" .... 0>0> 0 " .. " ",,0> .. m O>t' c:: t' H EEE ~ t't'c ;g ~i',; ~ H !il 0> HH" 0 .. ~ ...." H '" "0 H 0> 0> 000 .. O>O>t' n t'''' ~ " "''''''' 0> H .. '" H' t' , .. 0> ~, !;It;J H , ," 0> H " .. "''''!;! , .... ,., 1< 0> 0> m <H t't'.. .., "H .. ...... H H H H ... HHH H H"'H H H '" "'0 ... 00 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 000 0 0 !ii "'H ... "" H H H H " HHH H H"H H H ...... .. .... " ... :. .. .. ....... :. ...... .. 0 ... "H .. .... H '" '" H .. HHH H ",..W '" H .. "'.. " .... ... 0 0 .. .. ...... .. O"H H .. "'H '" "'''' H 0 0 H '" ...... '" 0"'''' .. W )> 00 0 00 H 0 0 0 0 "''''0 0 00'" 0 0 n ..... ;., "... '" .. '" .. ...... ... ""''' .. W I ww .. "0 H W 0 H 000 W HH" 0 " HH 0 H'" 0 W H 0 ""'H ... 00" '" H e H 3 "'''' '" H '" W "''''''' H "''''''' '" '" H "''' W ... '" H "''''''' '" ...... H 0 ~ 00 ... .. '" '" "'HH W WWW W '" W '" W W "'..... '" "''''''' .. , '" .. 0 '" , , , 0 "''''''' .. .. H '" H H ... "''''''' H '" '" n .. ..... 000 .. H H .. W '" 000 '" " '" 000 '" 0 '" , , , H 0 W HHH H .. 0 W " t' '" " .. 0 0 .. '" , <: on '" "'H ..... ;,::;j " .... '" "'''' .. .. '" '" '" .."'''' '" "''''''' .. .. 0 "''' '" "'''' '" '" '" '" '" "''''''' '" "''''' '" " H 0 "'''' H HH '" .. H '" H "''''''' '" HHH H H 0 "'" 0 00 0 0 0 000 0 000 0 t' )> 00 0 0 0 fa 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 000 0 0 H 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 000 0 0 z 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 H 0 000 0 000 0 H .. ~ ...'" .. "'... '" " '" .. '" ..W'" H ..W" H H .. H'" . " " I 8 [l ~ ~ '" '" '" t:; < 0'" ~ <. .. '" '" ~ ..", t' I-' ... '" '" .....n I-' !ii! ~ 0 ",S; ~ ~ '" '" '" .. 0 "'.. ""E'" ~'" "... ~I-' ."."."."."."."",.".,,0 ~Xl::tl-l .. 00" tjt"lJ:::t ii" "'" .....1-' "'..... ...E: tz:Itz:ltIiltz:ltlltz:ltz:ltz:ltz:ltlilZ ~fii~!ii! ....I-' c::'" ~2~~ '" "''' ~o~ ~ij "''' ~~~~~~~~~~, t' ....n 1-'0 1-'1-' "'" gS; ~i .. ~ 1-'1-'''' t'n ~Q~~ ..t' Q~ "''''.. "'t' h~~ no "'" at' on '" 1-'1-' "'I-' '" "''''''' '" "" !li'" 1-'''' I-' o-l"'" E:::1 "'.. ~~~~~~~~~~~ '" c::'" i';;[:l"'~ '" oE: 00 ~il> "'" .. 0 ~ ""0 "'''' '" .. '" '" I-' ~"'~ C::C::" 0 t1H~H I-' '" "''''0 ;'5E: !j!" "''''c:: "''' tz:I3:tz:ltj !ii! .. '" "''''c:: ~ il>'" !ii! 1'1'(:l E:C:: "'I-' ..... "''''I-' '" "'il> "XlXlXl"::o"::a::c::a~ "I-''' ~~~ ..'" i:;il>'" '" 0 tz:Itz:lt'Jtz:lOOtz:lt>iltz:ltz:ltz:l ~ '" 1-'1-'''' t'(:l .. .. 1-''' "'C:: '" 0 HHHI-IHI-IHHHH ... "'''' '" ",gj~ w", "''''~ ;j:g I-' :3:3: 3:3:3:3: 3333:::t "'''' ... "''' '" " I;l3tdtl:ltlltDtIltDtl3tlltIJ..... '" I-' !:J"'" "'''' "'t' '" ~ !a !a !Hi !a !a !a !a !a!a!i1 S; "'I-' ~gl ::l~o "'... I-' t'" .. ~ tIlOOUltllt/:llt/.lUltllUlOOH " "0 ..'" tz:Itz:ltz:ltz:looootzJtz:ltz:ltz:I '" ~ HI-' '" !a 3:3::::::::33333:3 "''' I-' ~~~~~~~n~ "" !l '" '" .... w .... .... 0 '" ... .... .... .... !;: ....'" '" '" w ..'" W NWW.... I.ONW.r:o '" ow... .... w........q... 0 ....'" .... ... ... 1-'0 w....-.lO'lI-'''''"w....w \0111........ 0 "'0'" .. 1-'000 '" ~ . . . . . . . . . . . 00 w '" '" lJ10N-.JON....WI-'O..,J WU"ItD!,Q W .."'''' .... 00"l01llo '" "'0 '" .. 0 1-'0 0 U"IOl,nU"l U"IO 0"" O'lO\D-.l 0 .."'''' ... "".,.00 0 .. tl. . . . . "'''' 0 0 O~ll~~iP~U ~ooo '" <"" 0 i~U ii il> "'''' '" '" 0 ~~ '" "'E:~ "''''''' '" ~~~ '" 0 "'''' '" '" t' "''''''' ::: '" I-' 0 >il> e '" iil ~eee tl"'''' e .. ~ HI-' " OtoCl')Itr.l~tofl:l(/)OOCl1 I-' ~~~ 0!:J",,,, 0 "'''' " I-' ";::'~ < ~ ~:r~"t:i~ ~ 3 '" Xll-i........" '" .......... I-' ..... E: 1-'1-'1-' ..... I-' I-'t'o " '" ~~ " " 80Xltz:l;tlZOO""" 8ZZZ ~ .. " ~zo" '" n " '" tl QOI-3::r::t-3Qt:1t1I-iI-iH ~""" ~oo " OGlCI1 " ". HI-' tl 8(;))lH> G':IG)>~~ I-' .... .. "il> !;: . ~~ '" c '" E=~~fl~~~~~~~ E:""''' ~ E:.... '" E:"'I-''' '" ~ tl C::C::C:: 1-'1-' c:: C::"I-' '" C ;. '" c:: OOt'ilO"'JOcooo "''''''' on '" "'''0 .... '" tl (:l Z Z'tl zzZ "''''''' "'''' '" '" " . ~E t' c:: t' t't't' '" t' t' .... (:l I-' I-' 1-'1-'1-' ~ "" I-' I-' 0 '" iil '" "''''''' ~~ '" '" "' t'o '" I-' '" "'''''' '" '" '" H'" iil "'''' '" "', '" t't' ". "''' ~ 1-'1-' .... ,,~ ~ ~ "'''' .... "'''' i';; "'''' . "'''' .... .... .... ...,J...,J....cr.N.................... ........... .... ........ .... w........ .... .. 00 0 0 0 OOOONOOOOO 000 0 00 0 "'00 0 ii ........ .... .... .... NNN....tn.................... ...."'.... .... ........ .... "'........ .... :.. j., '" . . . . . . . . . . :.. tl .... "'''''.'''''''''''''''ofilo''''''' ...... .. .... ...... .. "'''' w .... .... \D\D\D\D\,OWt.,)N........ w",w '" "'''' '" "''''''' '" .. .... .... ... ... \D\D\D""NIIloOO\DU"I ...."'.... '" "'0 '" "'00 '" ww ... .... .... U"IU"IU"ItPoU"lOOOI-'W 0"'0 0 00 0 "'00 0 il> 00 0 .... 0 0000000000 000 0 00 0 000 0 0 "'.. j., . . . . . . . . . . j., "'''' 0 ,j:a.Wt.,)wt-J,j:a.,j:a.Www "''''''' '" ",..w .. 0 "'0 .... ,j:a.WI-'WI-'.,.,j:a.www ............ '" 00 .... ......w w ~ 0.... 0 NOt-JOOt-JNOOO 000 '" ........ 0 0"'0 0 ~ I-' " ww '" .... "''''.. .... .... il> w I-' 00 '" 0 oww '" "'''' .. '" ~ 00 w 0 ow", '" "'''' '" ... "'''' ... 0 "'........ '" ........ .. '" In'" .. 0'" '" 00 '" I-' .... '" 0 00 0 "'''' '" '" .... '" '" 0 .. '" .... 0 " 0 t' '" '" .. 0 0 .. '" , < .. 00 "'I-' ..... ;,:;1 "'''' '" '" "'''' '" '" CD CD iXliXliXlO::l 0::l0::lD)D) "''''''' .. '" "''''''' '" 0 "'''' '" '" '" t-Jt-JNNNNt-JNNN "''''''' '" "'''' '" "''''''' '" I-' 0 ........ .... '" '" O'IO'IO'IO'IO'IC7IO'\C7IC7IO'I ............ ... ........ .... ...... .... tl "'.. 00 0 0 0 0000000000 000 0 00 0 000 0 t' ~~ 00 0 0 0 0000000000 000 0 00 0 000 0 I-' 00 0 0 0 0000000000 000 0 00 0 000 0 " "'.... '" 0 0 1-'000000000 ............ .... ........ .... 000 .... "' ~ 0'" w '" '" O\DO::l~O'\l1l"'WNI-' "''''... '" ..w '" "'..w 0 '" "'''' 0 0 '" '" ~ tI tI tI tI <: 0" '" '" .... '" .... '" '" ::: ~ ...'" " " tI '" '" '"' .....n ">l~ "' '" .... >l S !il .... tI " " '" !il!il~~ '" " '" 0 ..'" ~flflflflflflflflflflflflr:l "E'" ""0 ""'"' ">l ~tI " tI'" ......... ...."'.... !:; .. >:"''' ........'" "'''' '" ,," &1"'>l ~~~n~~~~~~~~~ "" "'8" fJ'"'''' tI'" ....~ ~ "" g~ 0~1: >lOc, ~~~~ ~3:~ "'..... ......... &11;; ""'0 n~ ~~ ">l on ,," I-IHHHI-l!-lI-lI-lI-lHHHt>:I .", '" "''' &:1: '" ....'" .... ~1:tl ~ZZZZZZZZZZZZtl:l ~~"" tI:ltlltJ:l::tl "'",1: "'''' :0 " 01: G'JQG:lGlG'JGlOQQG1GlG'J >>>tzJ " " tI " >l >l >l "" nnotr.l :00 "'.... "'.... ...." '" .... '" "''' 00000000000000 "')0", :"';::-;::0;00 "''''''' .'" '" ~~ 'iJ !il .. " " 0 ~'1il'1il'1il'lil'1il'1il"il'1il"'il"lil'1il "'....'" . , . ~,,'iJ .... .... ....... on,", ""'''' HHI-IO " " .... ..." g~~ ~~~!:Hi~~~!iH!!Hi i":",~ ZZ!2la 1:>:.... .. .. " .. >l "IiI'1il'1il::tl "'''' :a :a 0 " w'" "'.... HHHHHHHHI-I....HH "'f,'l'" ~~~:3 "''' '" ~ "''' ~~!il '1il'1il'1il"1J'1il""il'":r::l'1il'1il'1il'1il"'il ~~ " " 000000000000 ~>l~ .........~ '" '" " ~'"''' !l1!l1!l1!l1!H!l1!l1!l1!l1!l1!l1 " " .... tl~ tliItz1M~ " ~ ~ " n tI.... tI:ltlltl:ltl:ltlltotlltl:ltlltl:ltl:ltl:l @!;g] n .... ... 8 >l .... "'....... =' ... .., .... " ..,....'" ..,,,... '" '" .... 1;; ...." a:lw...w....".,.......WCJ\WIDWW ........, .... 0"'''' ..,,'" .., .. 0 "'''' ....IDO\to.)CJ\\Do\lJIWO\W\DWN .."'" ...:IlnUlU'1 "0" w........ w '" " 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...0'" 0"'" w ~ "'W IDO.".(J)".t<J!Ilr>O....w....""'........ 000 1,n00COlD ... 0 "0 O~....IlloWQ:)W....NO...:lCl:l...,J\D "''''0 0\0'\01"" 000 0"'''' '" '" ... . . . . . . >l>l <::0000000000000 <"'''' < "tI 't:l"\:I <:"'''' ~~~ tI tI <: )0 "'''' ~~n~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "''''''' t<J::tI:::o::o tl~f3 '" tl ~ n ~~ ""''' zooo " 8 ~~eeeeeeeeeeee tI)o)o Ot'IJ"'J"'iI tI )0 g~" tl ~ 0........ Otz3t>:1tIJ iil1:;l 0 [i! 00 "''''''' ::aClltoCl:l "'..." tI '" '"''"' ttlHHHHHHHHHHI-lH .......... """ "..... ....0 ..... >l " 88 ~ zzzzzzzzzzzz Cl~~ t-3HHH >l ~ >l"'" " .... ~ 0 o GlGlGlQQG'JG'lOG10li1Gl 0000 0 00... '" " ~ :T '"''"' >l ~~~ t-3ZZZ ~ .... ~,,1:i tI " . E= t/)tIltl)t/"J{{.It':ltlltlltotl:ltl:ltr.l 1:1:1:1: " " ~ '" iiliil iiliiliiliilfiliilfiliilfiliiliiliil >l c.... "' ~ "0 '" .... 00 "tI"CI"tI"tI't:I",,,,,,,"O'tl"O'tl """ " ,," tI . U tlt'lt"'t1t"lt'lt"lt"ttt'lt"t" "'"' "''''''' c '"' c n HHHHHHHHHHHH iil~ ~~~ " .... fJ '" 0 Mt<Jt>:It"3t>:1tz:1tz:1tz:1t1j[l1tzjtzj j!l '" .. "'''' tI:ltll(tl[J)tI:ltlltr.lt/)tIltlltlltr.l "'0 .......... " ... " "" '"'''' nnn .... !il ~ '" .... "''''''' '" ~. "" """ co .... co , " .... .", co e; '"' . "''"' ... '" ........ ....-...! 11I111............-...!,11I 111"""""" ........ ......... ........ ........ .... .... '" 00 0000000000000 00 "''''''' 00 00 0 0 ~ ........ ....r.Jt<J................~~................ ........ "''''''' ........ ........ .... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . tI ..... ~..~~~~~~~~~..~ ...... ........ ...... ...... " " ........ ....\O\Q\Dl1'IWW\D\D\DU1WW ........ "''''''' ww "" .... .... '" "'''' \D\D~~r.J""""\O"~N"""" "'''' "''''' ........ "" .., .., "" 111 U"IUlWO-...!OUlU1WO"",,O "'''' "''''''' 00 00 .... 0 )0 00 0000000000000 00 000 00 00 .... .. n ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . n ~r.J~r.Jr.J~~~NN~r.J~ ".. www ..." "w 0 ww .................................................... "0 000 ...." ....w ~ ...... 0000000000000 w" ............ 0... 00 e ... " "'''' wwwwwwwwwwwww ........ ..,..,.., ........ w .... 00 N~N~N~~~~~r.Jt<JN 00 . . . ..,.., " ~ ..,.., C1la\C1lC1l0\0\11I........................ "'''' .."'''' "'... ... "'''' ~N~~NNNO\O"IC1lO'lO"lO'l ........ ........ ..... w "'0 ooooooo~~~~...,. 00 """ '" .... 0"' tDO'\O'\O'lO'lO'lO'lCOCOCOtDtDCO . . , '" n w.... ..,......, .., '" ....0 ...... ..... ..,..,.., '" "''''''' ... ............ '" .., 0 " '"' '" '" ... 0 0 .. :0 < on '" "'.... ..... >l '" 0,", .... COCDCDCDCOCDCOCDCOtDCDCDCD .... ...... .... .... .. .. 0 "" WWNNWWt<JW~NNNN "" """ "" "" " " ... 0 ........ .................................................... ........ ......... ........ "'.... '" .... tI "'" )0 00 0000000000000 00 000 00 00 0 0 '"' ~g 00 0000000000000 00 000 00 00 0 0 .... 00 0000000000000 00 000 00 00 0 0 Z tI "w wwwwwwwwwwwww "" 000 "" ...." .... " '" ~ "'0 "WWWWWWNWNr.Jr.JN ..,'" ....,'" "'... ....'" 0 .... '" w'" ::1 '" ~ ~ ~ ~ " " " " " ~ 0'" fil '" ~ 0 0 '" ...'" , '" "E~ " .....n ,,~ '" '" '" '" ~ I-' '" 9 0 .... I-' d 0 ..... " '" 0 "'.. "" n" "'''''' ".., """"5; IIlt"'C::aQ "''''''' "'''''' 0'" .....1-' 00 "'" 0'" "'''' "'0 g!;!~~", ::aHl-lrnrn i:: 0 1-'1-' 1-'1-'1-' '" ...." .., 1-''' ~~ "..... ""> "0 1-'''5;;''' ""'" !Hl~ "''' gS; '" "'0 1-'''' ~~~ i:l" !i...."''''''' ~~o ..,0.... "".., Q5; n "'.., ~8 totl:ltl:lH "''''''' ra:~ 00 on "'..... 1-'''' "'"' "'''' 9 "'..~'" ' , " "'''' 1-'''' I-' OJ "'" ",::1 "''''" i:l' :1"'nn "'''' ""'" 001-' " 01: "'''' "''''~ "'00 >1-' " "''''''' "'''' ......, .., "'.. '" "'.., .., ):II "''tit'' ~~ES ""'" 0 ..,.., I-' '" :<II-' '" "''''''' ~ HHE >>~ """ '" fii! .. '" "''' "'" I-' 00'" ~ I-' "'''' 1-'1-' 00'" ........0 ..... " ~g '" "'''' o "'''' .",,,,5; "'''' 99' 00" ...'" ... '" i:li:l " I-' gg~ .. .., 0 ~~ :a '" >>" '" 0 ....I-' ..,..,~ ...'" "'I-' ", 1-i1-3li'l ,...." l;E:~ "'''' I-' "'''' " '" :0::0: '" '" "'..." "'''''' ~g~ "n ,,:1 '" 1-'1-' '" '" ~Q8 @ . '" nn . "'. '" ~~ I-' ~~. .., '" i:l ~ " '" '" ~ I-' d", "'''' :0: '" 1:~ [l .., "'''' :a I-' "" 1-'1-' " '" :0::0: I-' "'''' '" '" " "" '" .... ............ .... ... .... .... ... ... ... 0 ...'" CJIllllol-'NW "''''.... "'...... ... 5; '" .... ... .... "'........ a> CWo"JOID O....\DO'ICI\ "'....... ............ "'........ 0 '" 0 '" 0"'''' ... -..IIDW".O ....00".. ...."'... a>...... "'....In 0 . . . . . . . . . . ~ 0 ... 0 .... "'0'" '" OU"lO"'W OOIDCJ\O'I ........0 ............ "'....'" 0 .... 0 ... "'0'" 0 \Oo.a...,JO) w 0'1...:1 I1Hfl ........0 In....... ........... rJ . . . . . . " 0 Q 0 <"'''' 0 <""~,, irtl::aoo f'" f''' <".., > '" " '" ~"'''' '" nn~ ~ tI:!'tPO "'''' 00 i:l"'''' n 0 '" '" " "" " ""'''' "" "" 8 .. ~ '" !;l >> !;l !il"~~~ >> "'''' ~~~ '" I-' OI-'l-' OI-'l-' 0"'''' ~ '" ~ " "''''''' 0 "''''''' "''''''' 2~g '" I-' ..... .......... ..... ttH.atl1tr.1 I-i......HH .......... '" I-' " '" Cli/ii/i '" .., Cl8i/iii'lii'l Cli/ii/i Cl"'''' Cl08 n 0 " '" '" '" 0 ..,.., ~ '" ~ " ..,1-'.... " ~ ..,,,.... ..,1-'.... ~~~ ~~.. . '" " 1::1:1 " 1:"':11]1] 1:"" 0. :a ..,.., "'''' ~:a '" c '" '" "" .... '" " 0 " "" f@~ "''' . '" " d "'" d E"" ~~ 1]~ ~ I-' [j 6i:a [j 1-'1-' "'''' 0 '" "'''' .. I-' '" I-' 0" I-' 0"'''' "0 ~~ "'" n fii! "''' fii! '" "'" "'" '" '" ,I-' I-' " e. '" <'" , "', "" I-' .... " "'''' " '" '" .... ~ "', ~ '" ,'" '" . 1-'< " "''' ... .... '" .... ........ .... ............... 1-'............ ........ "'''' ........ .. ... 0 0 0 00 0 0000 0000 00 00 00 ~ .... .... ... ... ........ .... "..q......... ....l-'....I-' ....... ........ ........ ... ... ... .... ...... .... tJIo..... .... ...... ...... ...... '" '" '" ... "'''' ... ""'.........1-' U"I....fJ"IV'I ....... "'''' ........ .. .... .... ... .... "'''' .... \D\D\DID N\ONN "'''' ...... ....'" '" 0 0 ... "'''' ... 0\0'\0'It.J OIDOO "'''' "'... 0.... > 0 0 0 .... 00 ... 0000 OVlOO 00 00 00 n ... ;, .... ....... N,JIoNN ....... ...... n ".... ....... 0 0 ... ... 0.... ............... ".0...."'" ....0 ........ 0'" ~ .... 0 '" "'... 0000 ONOO ....... ...... ....... [l > I-' '" .... .... " ........ ............1-' \D\DID. ........ ...... "'''' I-' a> 0 '" ...... wwww ....""WID ...... 00 00 ~ '" .... ... 00 wwww WW...;j..,J "'''' 00 ........ '" 0 '" 00 "..."..... , , , , ...... "'''' "'''' 0 '" .... "'''' ..ollo. \DOco>> 00 "'In I-' ... .... 00 a\0'I0'I0'I w"..\O..,J ...... n ... .... 00 U"IU"IU"lU"l 0)........ ....... '" ....... ...:11-'(0.... In'" ........ ..,J.......w (OWNCD , , , 0 O'I...,)OCD " " In " ... 0 0 .. '" , <: on .. "'I-' ..... ;,:;l a> a> a> a> Q)COCOCD IDID '" ID IDa> (Xl CD IXlCO IDID IDID 0 .... .... '" '" "'''' '" t.Jt..JNl<.) NNNl<.) "'''' "'''' "'''' I-' 0 ... ... ... In ....... '" ................ U'1 U"I !J'Hn ........ ....... ........ " ;;.. 0 0 0 0 00 0 0000 0000 00 00 00 " f,JS; 0 0 0 0 00 0 0000 0000 00 00 00 I-' 0 0 0 0 00 0 0000 0000 00 00 00 " 0 0 ... ... .... ...... .... ........w ........1-'.... ...... ...... ...'" '" Q '" '" '" .... ...... '" >>....OID t-JlI'IW,Ilo ID.... "'In ....ID '" ...'" " " " " " " ~ ~ t' t' << ~ << ... < 0," 0 0 H H " " " ~ 0 ;., ~ ~ ..'" ~ " ~ ~ 0 0 ml ~ ....0 " ... , " 0 " m " '" '" " ~9 0 o"''''"t'~ 0 "'~ m m "S! 0 "'.. <<" ~m ;O:m m mo e:g> ~~ i'S~~ >m 0'" ....... !;S! ~~ 0" bl~ !;J,"'"5i8~ ~.; 0 " ,,> " "''' "''' t'o "'g 0~::1 00 ".... t':><.... ~i:; f1i::j mz g!; ... '" ,,> ...t' >f,; ., ,,'" 0" "., ~t':;; g[;; .,m "'0 "'0 ot' "0 tr.lt7ilt:"'ZP:I '" 0 " zo ..." "0 00 !H oC: ~~ ",... c:m fHJfl"::1'8 ~ m" 0" f.Jlii;J !;S; "'z H" ... 0" m" "0 m. .,.." >H 11 fa: " oE: ...... 0 c:" "" " Ot>;lH~tr.lH ow> ;:J~ 0'" Q!; ., E:~ t' :g H "'H tz:I ~H""""tl W... ~ ., "''''0 ... ... '" "... .,,, ~ ," co Ztx:l3: :;;"'~ :;1~ ""H 0 "f,; !il .. m ".. t'., '" "0 "'''' 05i'" ~ ...m> "'''' ..'" "'" !:)'" "''' m8 m ". 5ilil !f",;j ... H ... 0 " '" om ..m '" ~! 0 ~ Z Z "., "'.. Qg ~g .. ., om ... "'Z ... "'.... t' " t'> '" ~g w", gf.J t'Z i'S;J ~ ~~ ""... .. flfg OIH "" ...m ?;::;o:~ .. .... 00 '" m > ~~ ... ZO w .... OI... '" "to HO ..... "', .. ?;::t' .,.... w '" to., ... "" zm OH m", ~ " Z '" ... " 11'" ,,> "'0 ... "0 ~ '" .,~ g Z ....0 ~ '" m ,,;0: 0 '" m to 0 m '" " 0 .... ::" '" .... .... .... .... w '" ....r.J...,w .."'''' .... .... [;; .. w w w w '" \D\D..,J-..,lO,r.. ........0 '" '" '" .. '" '" 0 '" '" '" '" 0 t-.l.....U'lU'lVoIl-' "''''0 '" 0 .. ......'" .. 0 0 ;, ;, . . . . . . lii w 0 .. 0 lJoomw.... 000 0 0 0 .......... 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 ....a\....""(I)N 000 0 0 " ......w 0 0 ., . . . fl t' 0 0 " " <:~;:tI:o;:tl;:tl ;;j"'''' '" 0 0 ~~~ ~ 0 > H ~ ~ '" '" tliItl':IP:ltliIP:lP:I "'''' '" ~ " ~ 0 ~ .. 0 '" Z "d ''C,"'O 't"'O 13"" " " 8 " m m H to t:J>>>:t:o> >> > OI ~ 8m!:) OI .... .... ~ H QI-tHHHH OH'" ... .... .... lii H ... '" '" ~ :tI;:tI;:tJ;:tI;:tI;:tI "''''''' '" '" "'"... '" '" Z '" '" ................................. ........ .... " .... OH ~ " ... m " m " " Cl~~~~~ Cl~~ ~ " " .,"'z " n H H ... OI ... '" ;j"''' ... ~ :r m OI m Z I-3HHHHH "'H'" H m 0 E:~OI m . c: ;0: ~ ~ m E:~~~~~ E:~~ ~ ~ " ~ '" " ... ~ ~f.J '" ~ " OJ '" OI ... t' m 0 "''' '" . ... H H C/)tr.lCtl1tr.l E~ t' ... c: t' ~ H '" !il !il 0 f.Jf.J:gf.Jf.J G:: 0 ~ ... !il 0 to ~ '" Z '" ... '" m m l'd'Ut1'tl"tl 0" g m ... m 0 m " t"t'lHt"l1;" "'t' !il '" '" ;: HHtlQHH 'H , m e. tz:IP:ltr.lP:ltl3 ;;j!)l ;;j ... t' G:: CI1tr.l1 tr.ltn " .... '" I I till I "', '" ;: " t' <<...<< ...< H .... .... " ... ... ... -...l-..l....-..l-.J ........ .... ... ... ........ .... .... .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 lii .... .... ... .... .... .... to.)W....Nto.l "'''' '" .... ... ....... ... ... .. " :.. .. '" . . . . . 0 .. "'''''''''Ilio'*'" .... .. .. '" .... .. .. ... ... '" " ... '" \D\DW\D\D "'''' '" .... ... ...... '" '" " '" .... .. ... .... '" \D\D,",,\DID "'''' '" .. .... ...... ... '" .. 0 w .. 0 0 tntnOU'lU"l "'''' '" W ... ...... .. 0 > 0 '" 0 0 '" 0 oooco 00 0 0 ... 00 0 0 0 '" . . . . . :.. 0 .. .. ... WWNNN ..'" .. w", .. .. 0 ... w w W Wt<.)NNt-J 0'" 0 W w... 0 w ~ ... w w '" ........""....1-' "'... '" W 00 '" w ~ H " .. W '" ... '" NNNWN 00 .. '" '" H '" ... .... 0 0 00000 "'''' 0 w 0 11 ... '" , 0 0 00000 "'''' '" .. '" ... 0 0 ... .. wwwww "'''' '" 0 .. '" '" '" '" WWNNt-J 00 0 .. .... ... .. 0 .. '" 1.Dr.J\D0\"" 0 0 ... I-'ONW)-' " 0 '" ... .. '" g '" " .. 0 0 .. '" < 00 .. "'H .... ;,:;1 " .. .. .. .. .. .. CD co lI)CO CD .... '" '" .. .... .. .. 0 '" '" '" '" '" '" NWNNN "'''' '" '" '" "'''' '" '" ... 0 ... .. 0 ... ... ... .................... .... ... 0 '" .... ... ... 0 :;;.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 t' f,J!; 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 Z 0 '" ... 0 '" '" '" U'lUlU'1U'1U'1 ...... .. 0 ... ...... .. .. '" ~ '" .. w .... '" '" WN""....O W", '" '" .. ...0 .. .... "'''' '" '" " " " " " " 0 0 " i 0'" '" '" '" '" H '" ~ :>- t' .. 0 ..'" H a g ~ O! '" n 0 .. '" .....n ... H '" '" H OJ '" ,,~ " gg;~ .. '" H H H n 0 "'.. :0:'" ~~ I-i t-3 t-3 ~..:p..~ ..p.p< a" ~Q []~ :0:" OOOOOOOOt'iJ '"'''' 0'" .....H ........ "'''' 0000000 ~: 1:a >zj"ZJ "IiI0:IJ"ZJ"'o::I I'IjtJj ~!ll '" "'" H t'''' "''''H zzzz:z::z::z:tl:l ;:1: >zj0'lj "IiI"IiI"IJ "I3"1i1"ZJt:I ,," g~ t'''' ",,1: t'iJtz:lt>JOOtl:lt'iJtI:IO ..." t'o HHHHHHHHtI:I H Qi:: 0 "'" ::t'::c::o::o::o::o::o:t: "'''' "'H 6~ t' nnnnnnnoOtl ...'" on H " "'''' ~~ '" ~~ ~:' tl:lt'ilt::ltl:ltz1t1:1t1:1t1:10 g~ Ht< H ..0 ::16: "''''H ~~~~~~~; "'..... "'H ... " 01: g:o: ",," E:~ :~ 0 tIlU'ltr.lCf.ltr:ltlltQ[f.l HH ... "'''' HH'" H'" ~~ :a:a:aiiPii:a:a:a E:~ H '" ,,~ ~~~ ;l t'~ "t' 0 .. " ~ "'... ;;J;;J;;J;;J;;J;;J!dn 'l f::", " 'tl"l:ll;;l'tl "0 'tl "0'" " ..'" "'H HHHHHHHo .. (jgj t'lt"t-tt'lt'lt"'t'lt'I "'" .." !iJ(j R!l tl tn:H:H:n, t:1 H b:a t' HHHHHHHH '" .. ... H n QQG)G)G1G)G) '" "'''' H t'tItlJtz:ltz:ltl:ltl:ltliltI:I 0'" w'" " ~~ '" W tl:ltl:ltl:ltJilt>Jt>iltrJ t' "''' "'< .. tIlt/:ltllt/)t/)t/ltt:lCf.l OC: "''' H , , , , , , , 0 Ht' HH ... C:" " [] HH "ZJ"'iI"ZJ"IiI"IiI"II"'IJ " ;;j'" "n (j~ a '" "" ~~~~~~~ '" '" an n ..." ~ "'''' ~ '" l5l5S5l5S5iHi " " ... H :0: !Hl!HJ Q Q Q H !l " w '" '" .. w '" '" .. '" .... i:: '" .... ......'" 0 Q\l>JI-'l>Jl7\laltrlollr> W .... '" '" "'.... .... .... "'... .... '" ...."'''' 0 a'la\.....Q\Q\\Dl.o.IO '" '" 0 '" OU"lOOWl,n,r:..O'IW 00 0 . . . . . . . . ;, . . . . . . . . . ~ '" .. .......w 0 t1lO\WO\C1\\DWO 0 W 0 l-'-..lo,J(OOI-'WU!(D ....... .... 0 000 0 ~t1lWU1W-..lOO 0 W 0 0 J-lNU'10l>JWWO-.l "'''' . . . . ~ " ~t't' [] ~G)G)G'1C'.1G1ClG) '" '" " ~ <: G1 G) Cl '1 Cl G:I C'l G"l <~ :>- '" HH !HgBllHl f.'j '" '" '" ~n!!2!e! n 0 .... ~ " ;:l 0 f.'j", [] H .. 0"'''' t1PJtI:ItlJtJ1t1JtI:It>:I " .. g~ " .. 0 g~~~~~~~ H H '" g~~~~~~~~ ~ H " "'HH '" '" " "'H " '" "" ~ ..... ..... " ~ " '" a H ..."" '" l5 l5 H ... ...a n ~ ~~~ 00000000 ~ 000000000 0 ~ :T " 1"'i>zjP'IJ"'iI"IJ"'''''>zj H H 1-in:l"z:l"'o::l"lil"IJ0'I)"ZJ""3 ...'" . c: E:"I3"IJ"ZJ"IiI>zj"lj"'IJ ~ " E=>zj"'1"1i1"1i1"11'13"li1""i1 E::a 0- " HHHHHHH ... HHHHHHHH '" " " bjoJ '" onnnnnn '" nnnnnnnn " .... t' " '" tIiIt'":ItI:It:::It:<Jtz1tz1 E " '" t:1tlJt'iltl:ltlJtzjtlilt'il t' . H '" :g '" '" :g H '" :g t'Jtooomtotllto c: :g mtJ)fI)t/)tr.ltr.lmtr.l '" 0 '" " H :a:a:a:a:a:a:a 0 " H :a:a:a:a:a:a:a:a '" .. H e n '" " H n n '" "Ij'tl'tl'U'tl'tl'tl t' n '" "''''''O'tl'''O'''''d''' '" '" '" t"t"t"t"t'lt'lt'l , H '" '" t'lt'lt'lt'lt'itit'it1 ". '" HHHHHHH '" E HHHHHHHH .... t' t1Jt1jt1Jt1Jtl:lt'I3t>;1 H '" tlJt1Jt>3t>3t'13tlJtliltrJ .... '" tIltotllt(.l t(.l (tHA " , tIltll tIltllfAc/) tQtIl . " < .... w ........ .... ...............-q...... .... .... '" ... ...0'10'1.................... .... .. 0 '" 00 0 0000000 0 0 0 '" 00000000 0 ~ .... '" ........ .... .......1-'.............. .... '" .... '" ...W..................I-' .... ... :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 ... ..'" ~..".".".".~ .. ... .. ... o/:Io"..;:.~~~olloollo ... '" '" "'.... '" ......I1IWtoJ........ '" '" '" '" toJ\O\DO'IU"IwwtoJ .... .. '" '" "'.... .... U'l,o.toJ.;:.0 ID';:' '" '" ... '" .;:.ollo.;:....toJ.......;:. '" 0 '" 00 ... Woooo....w 0 '" 0 '" o ID';:'';:'O toJ 00 '" " 0 0 0'" 0 0000000 0 0 0 0 0000011100 0 n . . . . . . . ;.. :. . . . . . . . . [] '" w .... .. toJ!oJfo.)toJtoJtoJN ... '" toJNtoJ!oJNtoJNtoJ '" 0 0 w 0 0000000 0 '" .... 0 00000000 .... ~ .... .... w '" ........................ w .... '" '" ............................ .... ... e H " ... .... :P':P':P')l)l)l)l .... .... '" 00000000 ... H '" '" U'l11lt.nU"lU'lU'lU'l .... 0 .... \DID \DID ID\D \O\D '" ~ '" ... IDIDID\DIDIDID '" 0 0 .;:.~.;:..;:."."...;:..;:. .... .... '" 03 I>> co I>> I>> I>> 03 '" '" W a'lO'ICI'IO'IO'IO'ICI'IU"I .... '" '" .;:.~.;:.,o.,o..;:."" '" .... Cl'ltoJtoJtoJNtoJN"" '" H .... .......................... '" .....a 0 0000 0';:' '" n '" 03 CD CD co 03 03 03 '" O.;:..;:..;:.,o.ollo';:'toJ '" " '" WU"lt.nU'lU'lU"lU'lCl'l cn,o.~,o.""""~O'I , , , , , , , , 00000000 00000000 ............................... a t' '" " ... 0 0 '" '" .:: .. on "'H ..... ;,:;1 " '" '" "'''' .. co 03 03 a> 1>>1>> (D '" '" '" '" (D(D(DIJ)(DQ)0303 " 0 '" '" "'''' '" toJNNtoJtoJfo.)toJ '" '" '" '" toJtoJtoJWtoJtoJWN '" H 0 '" ... "'''' '" WtoJtoJNWWt.,) '" '" '" ... ............................... .... 0 ".. 0 0 00 0 0000000 0 0 0 0 00000000 0 t' h 0 0 00 0 0000000 0 0 0 0 00000000 0 H 0 0 00 0 0000000 0 0 0 0 00000000 0 " 0 N .... "'''' 0 0000000 0 0 0 .... O'ICJ\O\CJ\O\CJ\O'IO\ '" '" ~ '" '" ....0 '" .;:.~,o.,jlo,jlo';:'';:' w '" .... '" W........................o '" "'''' '" '" '" '" 1l '" 1l '" < 0", 0 .... .... ~ 0 '" ~ ..", " ~ ~ ~ " ~ I:' 'n " 0 '" H C '" ... ~~ H '" 0 "'.. ,,)> !<J"'''' "'''' ~~~~ ~nnni j!::j!::" 'tICn"O"iI"iItljtf.ln"il'tl....w~ c'" 'H H "'0 0 HHH~ !i!!ig!;JIO~H!;Jlii:::: '" "'Z "''' "''''Z i!;gj :tI::t':tIH !i!!i!!;! ",,,,,,,,,,,,,SH:;1,,,I:'''''''~ ",Z a nr: ~f:i~ "'''' Qtz:ltI:Itl'J::tI !B; ... '" :;l:ItlHI1Cntz1 t'lt'1t'1t1t'1t'lt'lH HHn ::C:I::Z: "dO H-.l on "'''' IHJ!i! '" ..'" ~~~~ggg~ Z z. OHOt(Hf.l3:"~ttln ~t>:l H'" H fJ~ ..'" 01:' I-i"il"il"il !i!!i! C~c:P"P.3 l-i <:W::tl '" oj!:: "' 0 "'... 0000 tzltz:lt:JtlJt>Jtz:ltz:lH toPJtt:l)>l>~n >~~(I)Gl ... "'H ......'" 0,,,, "''''''' t/.l.t/.ltr.lt/.lrt:ltlltf.lZ "'"' '" "'...... ~I:'...O OJ'" H '" I:'Z HH'" )>... ::8 " " 'tI HH H:tIt':! fil .. '" HCl U n'" Ql-'lJ'Iollo R'lttFi"lt>R"II"A'l:!: ~~ ..~..oo"' 01;l " ..... '" ~~ ",. !i"''''''' G'l I:oZZCt9 Z OOgH ..'" "'''' "'''' " 0",0 t"'t"'t"'t'lt'lt'lt"tz:I " H'" !<J!:l .. ... ... "'''' ... .... tljtIJtr:ltliItz:ltz:ltz:I..-I "" "'....1:' w ~ w", '" "'''' H ::l::l::l::l::l::l::l1l "'''' c '" '" "''' ... '" Z ... H tI1t-:1Cl '" ~ n ... tz:Itz:ltz:lt:z:ltIJtz:ltzl... ~ ... l; " '" iBl5151515151H '" " '" n c '" ~~~~~U '" '" ... '" '" W N W "''''N W W '" '" .. '" .... .... 0"'''' .... ww NNO .... !:: 0 "'....N '" '" (DW"'wc (Ol1'INtn.r:oCO....CO "''''''' '*'"Woo,JollolD..-J-.Joo,J\OWNW.... '" "''''''' .... '" w....O....1.O ""CD\OtDO'Ioo,JO'I..,J w",,,, O'I....O(l)W(l)o,J~(I)""'IIloW.... 0 ;" ;" ;. . . . . . . . . "'....w . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ o",w CJ'l\O...,JQ\O Ot!looW,*,"OG'l(l)Q\ OIlloOlDWCOO\l1'I\Ol-'NCO .... ....N'" 0 '" 0\ o'-O...l 0 a'lOOO....O.....r:O "'....'" lJ),jlolDlJ'I........IJ'IIJ'ICO....l1'I....ollo !J . . . . . '" <00 0 '" <::tI::c::tl::C <:G1G'1QQG1ClfJ <"'''' UIUUUUU )> ~ ~"'''' '" '" ~"'''''''''' [;l~~[;l[;l~~[;l ~j!::~ n "'''' '" '" 'tPCI'tI'tI n 8~~ ~ )> tj>>,>> '='tI:lt"iltl:ltz:lDJtlJtIJ "')> 0 I:' H OHHHI-I ~~~~~~~~ O"'H ~ "'...... '" ::tI::C;:cl::a::a '" '" 8 HH H , ........................ ...' '" "'zz Z ~ (j~H~ ... (j$<~ ... n ::J"" " ~ooooooo o,,~"g""g""""" ~ 0- I:' H 1-31-11...041-011-1 "iI"iI"iI"iI"iI"iI"iI ... H ~l; l;",l;l;",l;l;l;l;l; . tIl j!::"'''' '" ~ j!::~~~~ ~"iI"IiI"iI"'iJ"iI"iI"iI j!::~~ 0. fJfJ fJ HHHHHHI-l '" C nnnnnnn .... .... "'''' '" t'ilt'3rotIJtI:ltl:lt'il i::", . 1:'1:' I:' '" Eto1t/)[O HH H C iiJcc tot/HI1C/l1tr.ltr.ltr.l I:'C 0 "'''' '" '" "'''' iiJfJfJfJiiJiiJfJ "'''' .. tIl'" '" '" Q."",,,'t! '" I:' ::Ct"'t'tt" 'tI 'tI'tI 'tPO "0 'tI I:' "' H IHHI-l t'lt"'t1t'1t"'~~ H .... '" <a"''''''' HHHHHHH '" .... '" tA"'''' tJ1t1:1t'at':ltl:ltJ1tJ1 '" .... , :J:' , I ~~~~Ct1~Ct1 , . < H<<< '" .... ........ .... .... -J-J-J....a 1-1 I-II-I...q... 1-1"" ........ 0'1....0'1.........................0\11\ .. 0 00 0 0 0000 0000000 00 000000000000 ~ .... ........ ... '" ~~N~ ........................ ........ ........................................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .... .. .. 01:001:001:001:0 ,r..,.."""""""""" N" ""1JIo""0I:0.."""".,.....,..0I:01Jlo N "'''' '" '" """""""" .......U"Iww....... ow \D...\D..........................""\D .. 0 NN N '" \D\D\D"" U"Ilfld.J ""0 \D,r. "'... 1JIo\O""\D\D\D\D\D\D\Q""1JIo 0 00 0 '" U"IU"IU"IU"I 1.0.10000....1.0.1 0... OIDOll1lnm-J""U"IO\oo )> 0 00 0 0 0000 0000000 NO OlnOOOOOOOOOO n ;., ;., ;., . . . . . . . ;., . . . . . . . . . . . . n "'N ""~NN WNNNNNN WWl.oll.o.lWWWWWWWW C .. ........ .... N ONWN 0000000 N cococomcoco co CO co CO CO CO ~ 0 00 0 .... In............ 1-1..................... '" WWWWWWWWWWWW , ~ .... " '" 00 '" .... .............. 0000000 "'''' II1U"1l11l11U"1l11lnll1lnU"lU"lU"l H 0 ........ '" w ..........."'" 111 II1U"1U"1U"1U"IU"I ....... ....!....!....!....!....!....!....a....a....!....a....a....a ~ .... 00 .... 0 lI1U'tU"l,,", ....a....a....a....!...a....!....a "'''' 000000000000 .... , , '" .. OOOCO 0000000 00 000000000000 .. "'''' 0 '" .........0\ NNNNNNN ........ 000000000000 H W "'''' W 0 ""ID CO 0\ CO (D(D (DCO CO co CO....!lI1..""WWWWWW... n .... NN \Do\""lI1""coNNNNNN '" , w.... N""IDI1\....a...WWWwo....a '" ...... I1\WO\NOOWWNN....aN '" "'''' ,,",CO ONW,,",WWIJIoIJlolI1ID 000000000000 ....00000000000 " I:' '" '" .. 0 0 .. '" , <: on .. "'H , ;,:;1 '" '" "'''' .. '" (D(DtQtQ lD(D(DCOlDlDCO "'''' lDlDCDCDlDlDCDCDCDCDlDCO 0 N NW N N NNNN NNNNWNN NW WWWWNNNWWWWN H 0 N N'" N N NNNN NNNNNNN N'" NNNNNNNNNNNN C "'.. )> 0 00 0 0 0000 0000000 00 000000000000 I:' fi~ 0 00 0 0 0000 0000000 00 000000000000 H 0 00 0 0 0000 0000000 00 000000000000 Z N NN N N NNNN NNNI<JNNN ........ ..............................0000 '" ~ '" "'.... '" '" IIloWN.... 0000000 "'''' ....!o\lI1""WN....O\Do:;l....!O\ ....'" . c c !i ... ... ... tIl tIl tIl tIl tIl < 0", tIl tIl 0 H :t ... C ~ ... '" ~ ..'" ~ I:' " '" tIl '" '" 'n ~ 0 I:' '" ... '" H " .. '" '" n '" ,,'" '" '" Z 0 "'''' ""tIl 0" ~~~~~Gl ...... "''''tIl ~H :t"''' tIl . :t:t> 3:3:3:1-i c'" 'H 00'" "H OOtll ~~~ ...:;1 "'>tIl EQ "'0 ::J::J[1 000 '" "z ~h ..n :E::€:e: H 000 n >.. !Z:ZZ"O tIlZ g5; H'" >>>~~:;1 Z 0 ~agj tIlfl ... , ~~~f,] !J!:: n ........, "'0 "''' ""... on "'''' Cf.Itr.ltr.I:tl~ wwo, Hn tIl.. "'''' '''' H HH:t H'" H ......" '" "tl"'O'tlHHQ ........'" ZO !<J...i'! "" 8!:l '0' '" ......... '" oj!:: tIltll~ tIlO ~:a;:aZZI'lJ Ojg "" ",5; > ... CC HHHOQ " ~i!;'" "'H ...'" n tIltlltll H '" "''''H "'C 2:ZZ 3: ... n ~o ",Z tIl H "''''''' !il .. tIl ~~g i'![j """~~H n 0" ""'H "'n tIl::J :;1 ~~~ ..... nnnHH~ ~... ...~ "'tIlZ :4> ..tIl HH'" HtIl ,,~ '" tIl n '" HHH .. ... nnH '" filfilfil~~!:l "'''' '" '" n 0 nnn w", "''''0 tIl Q g:: .. "''''''' "''' ,z ...... 0 H H'" '" ,..tIl tl3t13to:1t13tl3t1 ZtIl '" fl '" H ;:o;:a ;:a~>O:" ~ e tIl Qi:J U~:g:g H '" Z nnn tIl " tIl "''''''' l; ... " ... t' .... t' 0 ODN....t..J " .. '" w" w...." '" .... ........ !:: "'''' .... ~j{:IoNoI:aolJollo ...."0 "''''''' '" w...." w .. ....,,'" "'''' w ...... '" 000000 "''''0 ...."'... 0 000 0 0 ",ww ~WNOD 0 ;" . . . . . . ~ ...... 000000 000 "....'" 0 .......0 0 0 ",ww WlnCD\Q ..... ... 000000 000 "''''0 0 ",,,w 0 0 ...W.. -..IOll:l\D !J . . . . . . ...... " <t10ctn::1 <"'C f'" C ~"" ~ '" <"'''' itoi~., > "'''' [;l ~f;jf;j[ijf;jf;j [;ltll'" "'''' f;j [;l[;l '" ~"'''' "''''''' n 1:'1:' n'" 00 '" "'''' 1:'1:'1:' 8 "'''' '" t:l tClCJl U1 tr.l tr.I C",O .... tIl C"'''' > c>> "''''''' "'''' ~ 0................................. OOtll 0"'''' , ~~~ H OHH O"tl'tl'tl ~ :t:t ;:a;:a::t:l;:a::o::a ::o:e:~ "'tIltll '" '" "''''''' ::tI:t::r::r: 00 t"lt>:lt:z:lt>:lt"l tIltll '" ~ , " 000 tIl ZZ .,OGlG1QQ "'HtIl "'HH " ... ~ (j~~ Io-)ZZZ n "'''' 0 QHHHHH OZ 000 H 000 Ot':ltJjtIJ Z 0- .. .-:JCIH/.IOOtol;/) "'tIl'" "'zz tIl ....... H "'HH ~ !:: . .. j!::~~H~ j!::"'> j!::j!::j!:: ... j!::.... Z j!::~~ 0. H "'... ~ H.... ... '" c n [j', nn tIl .... '" tIltll "'''' '" tIltll . HI-lHHI-l HtIl "'''' H ~ tIl fJfJ tIl ~fi~fifi 00 ~~ fil tIltll fJ 0 fJ zc fJiiJ H "'''' .. CACf.lCOtotl:l HH tIl n '" 1:'1:' '" a~ nn "'''' '" I:' HH "' I:' "'''' 1:'1:' tIl H "'''' .. H tIltll HH '" tIltll .... '" c "'''' tIl , , .... tIl tIltll .::: tIltll m '" ...... ........ .... ....0\............ ....'" ........ .... ".... .... .... ........ ............ .. 00 0 00000 00 00 0 "0 0 '0 00 000 !i ........ .... ....1-'1-'1-'1-' ....w ........ .... "'.... .... " ........ ............ . . . . . :.. c .... .. ora. ""'''''.Jlo W" .... .. .... .. .... ...... ........ '" w\Owww .." ....'" .... "'.... '" '" w... ............ Il' "'''' .. Ool:ao............ ....0 "''' .... "'" .... '" ........ .."'''' ..'" 0 owooo "0 ....0 .... ",w .. '" 00 ....... > 00 0 00000 ...... 00 0 00 0 0 00 000 n ww '" . . . . . ww :.. :.. io 8 oflooollo"."..r:a. "" "" www "'" 0 wwwww 00 w 00 0 " "" ""'" ~ ........ .... wwwww ........ w ........ '" .... .... ............ ~ H " ..... 0 ~-..I..,J..,J.... H'" ........ .... .... "'''' "''''''' H "''' .... 0\0"10\0\0 ZtIl "'" 00 .... ........ ............ 2 "'.... "' (I\O\Cl\Q\W ~!J "'''' "'''' '" "'.... """ , , Z .,.".".wO\ "'''' 00 '" ........ , , , "'''' W "..".".ww "'0 "'0 .... ".. """ H ...... .... \O.."JO\WN [j:l: " , www n 0" " , , , '" "''''''' '" 0'" '" .... ... H'" .... .... , , , '" '" 0'" ... .... ..ww '" '" z.. '" '" 0"'''' .. .. ..!i " 0 .......... .. .. .... ....ww '" '" "'c w " '" I:' '" '" .. 0 0 .. '" , < on .. "'H , ;,:;1 '" "'''' '" 1D(J)U1COCD "'''' "'''' '" "'''' '" '" "'''' "''''''' 0 "" " NWWt<.)N "" "" " "" '" " "" """ H 0 "" " NNNt..JN "" "" .. "" " " "''' """ c "'.. 00 0 00000. 00 00 0 00 000 > 0 00 0 I:' f,J5; 00 0 00000 00 00 0 00 0 0 00 000 H 00 0 00000 00 00 0 00 0 0 00 000 Z C ..'" .. oJlooollo"..,.1floo .... ..W 0 ww w w ww www '" ~ "'.... '" olloC7'lU"lW..,J ".... 0'" .... "'... '" '" ..w "....0 "'''' w " g >: >: ~ < ~ c ~ 0", " ~ H '" H tIl ..'" t' t' t' tIl ~ "-n .. ",E c " H >: c '" ",~::J "- 0 '" 0 "'.. tIl ....~ ~~ 33:3:3:S ..Z H'" ::l~QQe5~e5~~~~ C", "-H H '" '" HH "'''' HHl-ll-l !;J~ ~H '" "Z ~ 8!;!", t't' R::l t't't't'::J ~h~n~i~i8 tIlZ a ""'" "'... ",z !J!:: " '" cc~ [1'" ~~~~~ '" igt;j on ~ ..c ~~ 0", c cc i'l t' " H'" H tIl tIl ~~~ "'H tl:]tIltIJtQH C... ~ig rotllzzt<~'-<I-(t<t<~ '" oj!:: "'''''' CZ '" > tIltll "'''' ... '" ~~~ C '" ::tl:tl::c:tl "'... '" 8::t!t'lt"1t1ltlltlltlltlltll H '" '" t't'Z 8~ '" t'jpjtIJt>:J '" tIl'" <:HHt'!IrorotIJtzJtlJH fil .. tIl H con H HHHH tIl" '" ~':'1ii1ii:S:S:S:S:S:S&l ..... j!:: "'''' "''''. "'... " iHiiHi fJ!" ~~ ..tIl ~"'1;l H.... ...'" '" ~i ~~~~~~~ .. ... tIl ZZ H ~ ~~~~ '" H'" "'''' Z "', "" "'''' ot' n< tI1 t:zJt'":ItliItlJtliItlJO "''' '" >tIl tIl tIltr.ltr.lt/) i:'HJ "'H t'ftI: I I I I I Z ;'J8!;! "'" '" t'ltr:lt>:ltIJ n ~~ gm~tI1~ltIl '" " 33:3:3: '" "'''n "'H ~ ~~~~ ~ tIl tz:ItIiI ::a::O~::tI'tt .... "" ta:ltr.lpj~ It! >~:c '" >' to< tr.lH{t.I '" ~ j.( 1-3~1-3 ...."'w ;n ~ '" '" '" "'''' w w '" .... '" '" .... !:: '" ww", "'....'" .... '" w .... '" ... NlXlO\-..l-..lU'l(,n....O\l1l....J 0 ",W", .."'''' '" 0 Q\OOlXllXl.... 0 '" IDNO-..ltn\OtnWNOO\ C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . !i '" ",,,,w ",,,,w ... 0 ....wwww 0 0 c.n....I.OOOOWCDN....ml11 '" .."'''' 0"''' ... 0 OIlloIllo""CO 0 0 NlXlo\OWO\WWO\U'lN ... . . . . 0 ro <00 " C iUn 0 '" <~t-iI-3I-JI-3I-3I-3I-3I-3....:l > '" "'''' "''''''' ~ '" '" '" ~tlJt:<:ItJjtIJt>iltlJt>3rotIJt:r:I n '" "'''' Z"'''' '" '" C t'ft'ft'lt"lt'ft"t'tt'lttt"' n ~ oi!::~ 8~~ '" '" ~ .. trJtljrot"3rorotIJtzJtliI[Ij 0 ~ 13 Otlltlltlltr.l '" O'tt"Cl'tt"O'tI"O'tl''tt''tl''tl ~ "''''... "'...... ;tl"..;PtPd'tt tIl ::a:c:cxx:c:c:c:x:c:t: H "-H HH "- 0000 H tIl 0000000000 tIl Z (j~~ "'ZZ " 1-3::0::0::0::0 Z H I-3ZZZ2::Z:Z:Z:ZZZ n " 0"" 0 '" ~~~~~ " ~ Ot'iltzJ<<IpjtzJtlJtz:ltz:lrotIJ ~ 0- "'H ... .. C ~ . tIl j!::ZtIl j!::tIltll .. " tIl 0. iiJ ...c fJfJ H Hlo-lHH fJ '" c '" n '" ~~~n~ .... '" '" "'''' '" C '" tIl . t' tilt' t't' C t' '" H fJt;; HH tIl ::J H :s 0 '" "'''' iiJ '" .. tIl "'tIl tIltll H tIl H t' '" 0 n '" H t' Z '" ... '" .... tIl .... tIl '" '" .... , tIl ~ . < .... ........ ...... .... .... 0'10\........ .... .... 1-'1-'.....1-'1-'.................. .. 0 00 0" 0 0 0000 0 0 0000000000 ~ .... "'.... ....... .... .... N 1-......... .... .... ........................................ . . . . . . . . . . .. .... .... .. '" ................ .. .. ........................".............. W ~w ...'" .... .... \DID........ '" .... N............U'l.................... .. .... "'.... "'''' '" ... ........tnoJlo '" '" N\D\O\O N \0\0\0 \01.0 .... "'0 0'" '" .... \O","wo 0 '" 0\0........0-.101\00'10\ > 0 00 00 0 .... 0000 0 0 OU100000U'lOC n . . . . . . . . . . n '" "'''' "''' '" wwww '" w wwwwwwwwww 0 .... "'.... ........ 0 WWWt..l .... 0 WNNWNNNNNN ~ 0 ....0 00 .... 0000 0 .... ........................................ e H " .... ........ .... '" .... '" tD..J..J~~..J~~~~ H '" ww ..w '" .... '" Q'\O'IQ'\O'\l1'Il1'IU'lU'lU'lU'l ~ '" "'''' ....'" '" '" .... N..J~~~~U'1V\U'IU'I '" "'''' ..'" 0 '" .... , , , , , , , , , , .. "'0 "'... '" .... 0 ~\oQ'\O'\\Ool:o\o\o"'tD H "- "'.... '" N\O\OtD\ONtD...0.... n '" "- '" ....Wol:o....WNNtDol:o.... '" '" .. 0 U'l\o~Q'\NO'IU'I"'ol:o~ "- '" '" w .... '" "- '" " '" .... '" t' '" '" .. 0 0 .. '" , < on .. "'H "- ;,:;1 '" '" "'''' "'''' '" '" CD CD CD CD '" '" ~O:)CDtDO:)tr.lCDCDCDCD 0 '" "'" "'''' '" '" NNNN '" '" NNNNNNNNNN H 0 0 "'''' .... '" '" ,p,ol:ool:o,p, '" '" NNNNNNNNNN C "'.. 0 00 00 0 0 0000 0 0 0000000000 t' ~~ 0 00 00 0 0 0000 0 0 .0000000000 H 0 00 00 0 0 0000 0 0 0000000000 Z 0 "'''' "'''' '" '" N............ '" '" Q'\U'lU'lU'lU'lU'llnl1'lU'll1'l '" ~ .... "'.. "'.... w W O\,QtD~ '" .... O~\OD)lnO'\Ool:oNW '" "':0 i 0'" ..'" "-n '" " '" 0 "'.. '" C'" "-H 0 '" "'Z '" tIlZ g~ ... !J!:: on ~ H'" H '" oj!:: ... H '" fil .. tIl tIl ..... .. ..tIl .. ... w'" "''' '" '" n 0 El .... tIl 0 '" '" " '" '" !:: H .... Z '" 0 ... ;.. ~ '" c '" . 0 0 0 > '" n .... n " ~ ... tIl n Z 0- !:: . 0. '" c .... . 0 .. '" ~. .... .... ~ .. !i c .. > n n 0 ~ e H " H 2 H n '" " t"' '" '" .. 0 0 .. '" , < on .. "'H "- ;,:;1 '" 0 H 0 C "'.. t' h H Z C '" ~ ....'" 0'" ... '" ,'" '" ... CO-JO\CJ\""..ww.... ... .. 0'" ~ t' :l; l; 0 OOOOU'10J:0loDNO :!i ~ ..'" [ij ~ WNI\J....IIl""'CDU'1... "-n ." " 'C " "'.. '" j!:: '" "-H j!:: " ~ '" rnntll:E;....I-i:tCG'l 'C '" "Z [;l ~ tIl~"':>"'H:>~~ .'" ~ gl; t' t' .tIl '" '" ~ ~~~"?~Hrn :!J on '" ~ .. .. ~~~:on8:055~ .. H l; !i 'H oj!:: ....,,~!<J" .'" 1;l c .. !i!i' '" .... '" Q tIl !i'" O"'!i" 'H .. tIl 1000':0 R't~ .0 ..... '" 00 n;:o; .z ..tIl n rd ~. ~S5 , .. ... " . "'''' tIl 3: "O::a~"O , "''' . ~ :"~ ~ , , , ... H Z , . "'... " , . ~ ~~ ~ . c OJ . . Ii . . '" . . '" . > c . '" . ... . '" . H . '" . fil . n . . '" . . C H Z " t' H tIl ... 0 .. '" H t' t' tIl > '" '" ~ '" '" ~ '" t' 0 '" 0- C . ~ 0. '" " ... c c .... H H . '" .... .... tIl .... tIl ~ 0 0 '" 0 '" '" 0 '" '" ~ '" ...... ...."'.... .. ~ .. H . ... .... ....... .. ~ '" '" tIl U'1U'1U'1....CJ\OU"l...tn tIl '" .... .... '" ... ON-.Jl1IO\D\D....O '" e. '" '" '" " '" O\OW\DWL1100\1lI " .... C ;., ~ . . . . . . . . . ~ .... w W O........r.JOO....I.DCJ\ . l; '" '" '" o I\J......O\ \D.a:..-.JlJ'l tIl tIl C i!; '" '" ~ C .. 0 '" '" ~ ~ "" t't' "'0 ..'" 00 "'tIl < on "'H ;,:;1 0 0 "'.. '" ~~ ~~ "'''' '" '" ...... It It.. 0'" C cc ,c . . . ..'" 0," , , ,> '" '0 . . "-n 0 00 .... !i 0 . . " t'C'H "'''' ,> " . . "'.. ,Q" 00 . . " . . "-H . "" ,0, " . . "Z 0"''' "" '" '" tIl . . g5; ~~a 00 , 0 . . . 00 H C .... . . On 0" n 00 c '" . . . H "." , , n . . oj!:: ......t1.... "'''' " . . 0 0 "" ~. . . '" 0 " ....W 0 . . .. tIl . 0 " . . ..... n.. 00 ~ '" .. . . "'tIl 0 "'''' 0 . . .. ... 0'0 "-"- ~ " . . 0'" .... ~. 00 0 . . "''' . "" 0 . . . "-"- 8 .. .. .. .. .. .. 00 . . .. 00 " .. .. .. .. .. .. 0 " n . . ~ cc ~ ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. H>-< . . tIltll " . . '" "'''' '" ItOOoo. " fij~ ~ . . tIl ~. . . 0 " tIltll *lJ'IlJ'IlJ'IU'l" 0- " "'''' . . . . "" . . 0. " ~~ ........................... If- C . . .... '" 0 . . . zo tIltll '" .0000.. .... "- . . 0 0. 0 . . .. " .. I\.l N t>J t>J . tIl "- . . '" '0 0 . . ~. tIl. 0 '" ........................ .. .... n . . .... . c . . . H ",,0000" tIl . . t' '" . . "'''' ~ .0000.. H . . '" . . '" .......... .. t' " . . o ~. ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. "'" . . "'. .. .. .. .. .. .. "" . tIl . . t't' . . "'0 n . . ..'" ....'" . . 00 OH . . "'tIl . . , . . < . . on . . "'H fu-: ;,:;1 0 . . 0 . . 8" . . . . ;;i5; )J' "'c . . ~~ . . . . .. .... "'''' " t' '" 5; < 0'" n ~ 0 '" ..'" 8 .. 0 Z "-n .. 51 c '" " HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH~ o,o,~ 0 "'.. ~."."'t:I"'l::l'tl'tl.,,ttl 88 C'" "-H ~~;cl;cl;cl:::a;cl;clU1 zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz '" "'z 00000000 11111111111111111111111111111: ~~ tIlZ g5; 1>j'""J>zJ"Oj"IJ0J:l"llj'"J"IJ " ~~ !J!:: tzI[I:ltz:ll>iltzlt:z:ltIJtzI~ tIltll on tr.lrt.ltl1U1l:f.lt/.lCf.ltr.l !<J!<J" H'" H U1t1:lt/)tr.ltlltlltr.lU1 ",,,,Q '" 01=: HHHHHHHH:::"l ~Q~~~~Q~QQQQQQQQQQRQQQQQQQQQQn ... ~~~~~~~~;cl "''''~ tIl H '" H ...... &;;J 0 .. tIl 1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:8 ... Z ..... H ~~. :,:'" "'tIl tIl '" H .. ... tr.lCI:IU1U1rJ)mU1tr.l tIl ~;:j 0'" tzltzlt"lt'JtzlPJt'1t:r:1 CC "''' ~~~~~~~~ H tIltll8 .. Z 9\L 0 HHHHHHHH tIl '" nnnnnnnn "'''' n tI][zjt:<:lMt'Jltz:ltzlt>J HH '" tr.ItIlOOU1U1U100tr.l ZZ " "" ~ ... .... '" "'.... "'.. .... .... ............ '" '" '" "'.. t-J....N........ t-.)~ t..JN,r:.W ~ N~....~ N~~~ o~o ...."'''' ~ ........ .. .... ........ .. ........ .............. ....'" CD....U'lIlloU'1U"l NIJ).,JWOOWI-' ~1-'''''~U'lU"lO~NU"lWNU"lWNWNI-'U"lN~ w....'" '" !:: OCf\-.JNNCO\.QU'l\.Q U'l\.QNU"lU"lWCf\I-'~Cf\NWIJ)Cf\\.Q\.QOt-.)Cf\U"l""\.Q"''''~''''WCDCDU"l ....ww 0 ""'Ol-'NCDNOID \.Q1-'".....NI-'OI-'CDOW\.QlJ)OVlNWWI,Q,r:.WN\.Q\.QWI-'I-'W....JW ........'" .... 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . !i "'''00\00000 ON\.QQ)U"lQ'\U"lCO-.JOt-.)Q)".U"l".N~Q'\U"lI-'WI-'U'lNONU"lCDU'lW ........'" '" NOOU"lOOOO-..l OO\NU"lQ'\OWVl....W".....NO\-..l....J".\.QQ)Q)WI-'W....\.QONVlN-..l .......... 0 ... . . . ~89889888 ~HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH <nn ~ > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ~~~ n i!lZZZZZZZZ Ztr.ltr.ltr.ltr.ltr.ltr.l~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~ n ootQtQtQtf.l,tf.l,OOOO ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ... 0 ~fifiEHififififi ~ ~ ~ ~ I-i I-i I-i I-i I-i I-i I"'P.~ ~n ::J tIl ';HHHHHHHH I-innnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn n ozzzzzzzz O~~~~~~~~OO~~~~~~AOOOO~~~oo~~rnrnrnrnrn Z 0- I-3IiJQQGlIiJCiJ:IiJG) ~ !:: . 1=:~~~~~~[;l[;l 0. '" C tIltll .... IiJGlGlCIiJGlIiJQ "'''' . HHHHHHHH ~~ zzzzzzzz 0 t'iloorn~t:lJt:IJ~t'il HH " t:r:IrnrnrntrJoot'ilt'il nn ~:tl;tl::o:tl;tl::o;tl "'''' '" , , , , , , , , tIltll ~. 1iJC':lC':lC':lC':lC':lGlGl .... [;l~[;lnU[;l .... . t:r:ItlJrntIJ~oot'lt'O .r:-.r:-.r:-.r:-.r:-.r:-.r:-.r:- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .... .... .. \DU"IU"IU"IIDU"IlDollo 00000000000000000000000000000 0.. 0 ~ \DU"IfJ1U"1\DfJ1ID~ NNN~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "'.... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r:-".".".ollo".".". ".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".~.".~".~".". .... .. \,QIDIDIDIDID\,QID 1D1D1D1D1D\,Q~~~WWWWWWWW~~~~~~~~~~~~ "'''' '" .. NNNNNNNN 1D.."'..~~N~~~~U"I"'NOIDIDIDID\OIDIDIDfJ1"'.~ "'''' .... ~U"IU"IU"IU'lU"IU"IU"I U"I\OU"I",woOOO~U"IWOOOOOIDID=~~U"I.~wwo~ "'''' 0 > 00000000 OOOOOOWNOOOfJ100000U"looooooooooo 00 0 n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 w..........wwwww wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww .... w 00000000 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 00 .... ~ w.....wwwwww 00000000000000000000000000000 "'''' 0 e H " wwwwwwww NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN ~~ H NNNNWNNN m=.=~oo==moooommm~oo~~moooo=mm=mmmmm ~ to=O)O)mlJ;llJ;llJ;l U"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IV'lU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"I 00000000 U"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IfJ1V'1V'1U"1V'1U"1V'1V'1U"1V'1U"1V'1U"1~U"IU"IU"IU"IU"IV'lU"IU"IU"I "" IDm....J~V'I"......N """""""""""""'" ~~ H U"IU"IU"IV'lU"IV'lV'lU"IV'lU"IV'lV'lV'lU"IU"IV'lU"IV'lU"IU"IV'lU"IU"IU"IU"IV'lV'lU'lV'I n ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ '" """""""""""""'" V'lU"IU"IV'lU"IU"IV'lV'lU"IV'lU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IV'lU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IV'lU"IU"I .... ~....J....J~....J....J....J....J....J....J....J....J....J....J....J~~....J~~~....J....J~....J....J~~....J ........ """""""""""""'" U"IU"IU"IV'lU"IV'lU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IV'lU"IU"IV'lV'lU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"IU"I mm=mmmmmmmO)mO)O)O)O)O)O)O)O)~mO)mmtOtOO)O) " t' '" '" .. 0 0 .. '" , < on ..., "'H "'''' "- ;,:;1 '" CDtOCDmCDCDc:om mCDCDmc:omlJ;l=lJ;IlJ;IO)lJ;IlJ;IlJ;IlJ;IO)O)COtOcotOCDCD=CDCDCDCDCD "'''' '" 0 NNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNWNNNNNNNNNNN "'''' '" H 0 w.....wwwwww wwwwwww.....wwwwwwww.....wwwwwwwwwwww ....... .... c "'.. 00000000 00000000000000000000000000000 00 0 t' ~~ 00000000 00000000000000000000000000000 00 0 H 00000000 00000000000000000000000000000 00 0 Z wwwwwwww NNNNNNNNNN~~~~~~~~~~Ooooooooo 00 0 '" ~ O"I"'U"IW~....JNO 1D00....J~U"I".WN~O\OlJ;I~~U"I".WN~01D0)~~U"I".WN~ W'" .... '" ....'" c: "i <: 0 td tIl ~ .. '" "-n .. " " H 0 CD "cJ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ 'H >"i ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. 002 g~ ~, ~ooooooro~rororororororororororororo> Q~ on ~ ~~oo~~oooo~oooooooooooooooooooooo. HOO H ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ o~ ~ro 0000000000000000000 H ~ ro~ ZZZ2ZZZZ2ZZZZZZZZZZ 0 "00 ~'" 1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=:1=: z ~~ ~ .. 1-3 o 00000000000000000000000000000000000000 000 rorororororororororororororororornroro ~3 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH ~QQ~~Q~QQ~QQQQQQQQQ mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm .. .... ~ ~ W~ W~ ~ ..... .... ~ ~~m~lD:~~~~~~~~lD~~~~~ ~ CD ~OlD~lDO~~O~lDW~~O~W~~~ 0 o ~W~~~N~N~~~~~~N~~~~~ 2 o ~~lD~lDWWOOlDWW>>~~WWww~ "i " ~'ccnnnnnnnnnnnnn8nn8 > rn 00000000000000000 00 n 1-3 ~~zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz n ro ooommmmmoommmmmmmmmmm 0 ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ S , 1-38881-388888888881-3888 ~ m ~ 8mOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH n o 0 ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ Z 0- ~ 1-3~~QOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO > ~ Z >>> ~ 0. tIl ~"''''~~~~[;l~~~~~~~~~~~~ '" ~ ~tooooooooooooooooo G ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 rororn~~~~~~~~~rnrn~~rn ~ I I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ m "O"tI 'I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I . I' .... ~~' "" """ """""" """"" .... ......,,[;l~[;l~[;l[;l~[;l[;l[;l[;l~[;l[;l~[;l ~ ~~~~~~~~~w~~~~w~~ ~ ~m~~~w~~~~~~~~~~~w~ ~ ~ 88~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t1 ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ OOO~~N~~NN~NNN~NN~~ W ooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > o ~~ooooooooooooooooo n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n ~ WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW 0 ~ ~oooooooooooooooo S ~ ~wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww ~ ~ .... " ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~::::::: ~ N oooooooooooo~~~~~~~ 0 o ~m~~~~~~w~~o~~mm~w~ H o n .... '" " t' '" '" .. o 0 .. '" , < on .. "'H -:0- 0:;1 ~ ~~~mmm~~m~~~~m~mmmm 0 N NNNNNNNNNWWNWWNWNNN ~ 0 W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW t1 ~~ > o 0000000000000000000 ~ ~~ o 0000000000000000000 H ~ o 0000000000000000000 ~ ~ WW~~.~~~~~~~~~..... ~ 0 ~ ~~~~~O~NWo~m~~~.W~N ~ '" "'" < 0," ~ ..'" "-n '" c '" '" 0 "'.. '" C'" "-H 0 '" "Z ~ tIlZ g~ !J!:: on (j H'" H '" 01=: ~ ... H '" fil .. tIl tIl ..... .. "'tIl .. ... 0'" "'''' '" '" n 0 rJ '" tIl ... .. '" . '" 0 !:: H '" ~ " 0 '" .... ~ c .... , 0 0 0 > 0 n '" n 0 0 ~ tIl 0 ~ 0- . 0. '" c .... . 0 .. '" ~. .... .... . .. !i c .. > n n 0 ~ e .... " H ~ H n '" " t' '" '" .. 0 0 .. '" < on .. "'H "- ;,:;1 '" 0 H 0 C "'.. t' ~~ H Z '" ~ w'" ... '" ,'" '" ... CX)-.lO'\O\~lJIolJloof:olJ'" '.. .. 0'" ~ t' :s; s; 0 OOOO\OU1""OIDO :~ ~ ..'" C ~ Wt-.lt.)I-'\DII1...:1NI;O... "-n '" '" " " "'.. ~ '" '" "-H 1=: " '" 1=: t:UOU'1:t:H...t-3t03:t:Gl C '" "Z ~ ~ tIl~~~ili:g!;J;J~~ '" ~ gS; t' t' tIl '" '" !J~",,,,,,,,,,,...,,,,,, !J on '" ~ .. .. li] "''''~n8''''''~ .. H !:: [;1 H a1=: ...,~ (il3:>t-3 '" r.: 0 .. !i ~". "H '" ... '" Q tIl !iotlc ~?f:Jc!i" H .. tIl CC n",,,!i fil ..... '" "'tIl n H Cf.l H' ~ t:l .. ... 1;l '" " 8" ....'" " !i;g"'",~ 0" [;l ... \'J ~ ... H H 2: txH.)t.o C .. !::fil1=:.. ~ OJ ~ &It;l~~ '" '" c >c '" ... '" .. H '" !i fil n '" c c H ~ t' H tIl ... 0 .. '" H t' t' tIl i!; '" '" E '" SJ tIl t' n '" '" 0- C . '" ~ 0. c ... C C .... H W H . '" '" '" tIl '" tIl \'J .... .... '" .... .. lJ1Nlo-IO'\ .... '" 0 .. .. ~ .. "".......W...OlD 0 ~ .. H . . .............. .. ~ 0 0 tIl 0 lJ1lD 0 I-'O'IN 0 OI.DoIlo tIl '" '" '" '" '" N\D..,J\DOillaoO\IJIoNUI '" .... " " " " G:l...O\N.......JO...W.,J " .... C ;... ;... ~ . . . . . . . . . . ~ .... .... ....N..,JO<I..-.lIl1COl,nO) m ~ .... ... .... ""O\-.l\O WI-' tDIDO\oJlo tIl i!; '" '" :i! '" c .. 0 '" '" i!< " ~ "" t't' "'0 ..'" 00 "'tIl , < on "'H ,,:;1 0 0 "'.. '" ~~ "'~ 1; "'''' . .