Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 21, 1985 e<<, ~ ANDOVER AGENDA PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION March 21, 1985 1. Call to order 7:30 2. Park Fence Guidelines/Policy/Procedure/ Specifications 3. Engineer's Report Discussion 4. Pleasant Oaks Park Discussion 5. North Glen II ~ark Discussion 6. Lion's provision for tournaments discussion 7. 8. 9. Approval of Mi nutes 10. Adjournment e<<, aI AN DOVER MINUTES PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION March 21, 1985 The regularly scheduled meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission was called to order at 7:45 at 1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W., Andover, Mn. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: ALSO PRESENT: Prochniak, LeFebvre, McMullen, Kinkade Szyplinski James Schrantz, City Engineer Frank Stone, Public Works FENCE GUIDELINES AND ENGINEER REPORT Prochniak stated that the intention for this policy is to have guidelines for the developer to follow for fencing. Do we want fencing added in with the Engineer's Report? After considerable discussion regarding this matter it was decided to put Part 3 of the fence guidelines in with the specifications in the Engineer's Report. The City Engineer will handle this aspect. When completed,the Engineer will forward this to the Park and Recreation Commission for thoir review and then it will be presented to the City Council. PLEASANT OAKS PARK The Chairman asked the City Engineer for an update as to how things were going with the development of Pleasant Oaks Park. The Engineer stated that no building permits will be issued until the Developer finishes the walkway to the lake and the grading and seeding. Mr. Stone stated that all the playground equipment is being stored and is ready to put in the park. Mr. Stone stated that if the Park Board will draw up a plan as to where they would like the equipment placed in the park, the Public Works department will place it in that location. There was discussion as to whether this would be a good idea,when the developer has not finished the park to the City Engineer's and Park Commission's standards. It was then decided that the City Engineer would check with the City Attorney and,if it was indeed possible to proceed in this manner, then the equipment will be installed in the park. A plan was then drawn up to show Public Works where the Commission would like the equipment placed in the park. NORTHGLEN II ADDITION PARK There was discussion regarding the completion of this park. The Commission referred to the motion made on December 6, 1984 and the following motion was made: MOTION: by McMullen, seconded by Kinkade to recommend to the City Council that they do not approve the final plat for NorthGlen V until Good Value completes the work on the park area in NorthGlen II is' completed as agreed upon:by Mr. Peterson at the December 6, 1984 meeting. (See attached) Motion carried unanimously. -2- TOURNAMENT APPLICATION It was decided by the Commission to forward a copy of the tournament application to the City Council for their review and approval. If any changes are suggested by the Council, they will be made and the new form will be put into effect this year. HAWKRIDGE The general concensus of the Park and Recreation Commission was that this park does indeed need to be developed. Therefore, the following recommendation was made: MOTION: by Kinkade, seconded by McMullen to forward to the City Council the recommendation that the value of $2250 per acre for Prairie Meadows and Woodland Ridge be used as the estimated market value in determining park dedication fees. Prairie Meadows 10% of 41.98 acres X $2250 = $9445 Woodland Ridge 10% of 79.75 acres X $2250 = $17,944 Total $27,988 Previously, City Council approval was given to the developer to allow materials and labor in lieu of cash. At this time the Park and Recreation Commission requests the developer to provide the Commission with a cost breakdown for the grading and seeding of Hawkridge using Scheme A (revised 11/6/84 see attached) before the final approval of Prairie Meadows arid~Ioodland Ridge plats. Motion carried unanimously. BOY SCOUT PROJECT The Commission decided to send a memorandum to,Glen Eiden requesting that he attend the April 4, 1985 meeting. The Commission is requesting a written presentation and proposal for his scheme and cost elements. After review, this information would be sent to the City Council for their approval. MOTION:by Kinkade, seconded by LeFebvre to adjourn the meeting at 10:35 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. ~spe tfully, s..u.bmitted by, ~ /. /J' ? . ~~'c:i-r/i::c;N-o;;X- Lola Lihdquist,~5ecretary