Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNovember 5, 2020. 'r1kosbA �.,-c .. 4 MIL10141TJ 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV Regular Park & Recreation Commission Meeting November 5, 2020 7:00 P.M. Meet at Andover City Hall 1. Cali to Order 2. Resident Forum 3. Approval of Minutes (10/15/20 Regular and Work Session) 4. Agenda Approval 5. Consider Nightingale Meadows Sketch Plan/Park Dedication Requirements 6. Outstanding Items 7. 8. Chair's Report 9. Adjournment 7:15 P.M. Or Shortly Thereafter Workshop Session A. Discuss Draft 2021 Park Dedication Study B. Adjournment Note: Some or all members of the Andover Park and Recreation Commission may participate in the November 5, 2020 Park and Recreation Commission meeting by telephone or video conference rather than by being personally present at the Park and Recreation Commission regular meeting place at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, MN 55304. Members of the public can physically attend, although there is very limited seating in the City Council Chambers as appropriate social distancing will be done by the Commission and visitors. • t^ 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV TO: Park & Recreation Commission CC: David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: Todd J. Haas, Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: 5. Consider Nightingale Meadows Sketch Plan/Park Dedication Requirements DATE: November 5, 2020 The Park and Recreation Commission is requested to review and recommend the park dedication requirements for the proposed sketch plan of Nightingale Meadows. A copy of the sketch plan is in the side pocket of the packet. Twenty-two lots are being proposed. The proposed sketch plan is located on the west side of Nightingale Street NW just north of Veterans Memorial Blvd NW. Also attached is the location map of where the new development is being proposed and where the location is in relation to other existing parks in the area. Staff is recommending a trail be constructed along the west side of Nightingale Street NW from the new street south to Veterans Memorial Blvd NW. Staff is recommending cash in lieu of land. The developer has been invited to attend the meeting to make a short presentation on the proposed development and to answer any questions the Commission may have. ACTION REQUIRED The Park and Recreation Commission is requested to review the proposed sketch plan and recommend on the park dedication requirements for Nightingale Meadows Sketch Plan. Respectfully submitted, _Ao Todd J. Haas Cc: Dale Willenbring, Tamarack Land Development, LLC (copy sent by e-mail) Attachments: Location map; Letter about the development; Copy of sketch plan (side pocket of packet) PARKAND RECREATION COMMISSIONMEETINC — OCTOBER 15, 2020 MINUTES The Regular Bi-Monthly Meeting of the Andover Park and Recreation Commission was called to order by Chair Lindahl on October 15, 2020, 7:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1885 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners Present: Chair Jim Lindahl, Commissioners Mark Miskowiec, Jake Widmyer, Kathy McElhose, Tracy Strombeck, and Sophia Newton Commissioners Absent: None Also Present: Assistant Public Works Director, Todd Haas RESIDENT FORUM Jeff Smith, 1527 13911 Lane, came forward and said the pickleball group plays outdoors from April — October. He said he saw the Commission voted against pickleball twice at the last meeting and asked for an explanation. Commissioner Strombeck stated the Commission did not vote against it. Chair Lindahl said Commissioner Widmyer voted no and said he did not think the issue needed to be discussed at this time. Mr. Smith stated the pickle ball group was going to attend the City Council meeting as a large group. Chair Lindahl stated he appreciates the time and opinions of Mr. Smith. He said this type of citizen involvement is what makes things happen. Chair Lindahl reported pickle ball courts are identified in the Parks CIP and if the pickleball group can contribute funding towards the study, the project will be moved up to 2021. Chair Lindahl said the Commission does not make the final call on the project, the City Council does. He said the Commission is not against pickle ball, and they are trying to fit it into the CIP along with the other projects needed in other parks. APPROVAL OFMINUTES October 1, 2020 Regular Meeting and Workshop Meeting Motion by Miskowiec, seconded by Strombeck, to approve the October 1, 2020 Regular Meeting and Workshop minutes as presented. Motion taken by roll call: Strombeck - aye Miskowiec - aye Lindahl - aye • Regular Andover Park & Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes — October 15, 2020 Page 2 Widmyer - aye Newton- aye McElhose - aye Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Chair Lindahl requested Item 5 be removed from the agenda. Motion by Widmyer, seconded by Newton, to approve the Agenda as amended. Motion taken by roll call: Strombeck - aye Miskowiec - aye Lindahl - aye Widmyer - aye Newton- aye McElhose - aye Motion carried unanimously. GOAWI ER NIGHTANr. Ar c sJC 4D0WS osnTCX Dr a 4%4p nyyrT7 T REQUMO Item removed from agenda. CONSIDER SUNSHINE PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT IMPROVEMENTSY21-11 Assistant Public Works Director Haas reported the Commission has two playground structures to choose from for installation at Sunshine Park. The playgrounds are for the 2- 5-year-olds. Commissioner McElhose stated she polled the younger kids in her neighborhood and most chose Option A. Commissioner Newton stated she asked parents in her neighborhood and they preferred Option B. Commissioner Widmyer stated he agreed with Option B and his three -year -old agreed. Motion by Miskowiec, seconded by Widmyer, to recommend to the City Council Playground Option B for installation at Sunshine Park. Motion taken by roll call: Strombeck - aye Miskowiec - aye Lindahl- aye Widmyer - aye Newton- aye McElhose - aye Motion carried unanimously. Regular Andover Park & Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes — October 15, 2020 Page 3 ANOKA COUNTYSHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT QUARTERLYREPORT Assistant Public Works Director Haas presented the Sheriff's Department Quarterly Report noting that it was a busy summer for the Sheriff's Office. Commissioner Newton asked if there can be an adjustment to the trail camera to get the license plates on camera. Mr. Haas responded they will be adding lights to help deter vandalism and the improve the view of the camera Prairie Knoll Park. Mr. Haas asked residents to contact the Sheriff's Department if they see people and incidents that do not look right. PA RK DEDICA TION IMPR 0 VEMENT FUND Q UAR TERL Y REPOR T Assistant Public Works Director Haas presented the Park Dedication Improvement Fund Third Quarter Report. Chair Lindahl said it is nice to have a surplus this year, but it may be down next year, as many part dedication fees were collected up front. OUTSTANDING ITEMS 1. Andover Community Center Advisory Committee Update: Commissioner Strombeck reported the Advisory Committee will be meeting on October 21. Commissioner Strombeck relayed the report from the Community Center Manager Erick Sutherland. He stated they have been very busy and sent out cards to Andover Residents. The Community Center is taking appointments for residents to come in and get their passes and take a tour. Commissioner Strombeck stated the walking track is open and free to all until November 2, when they start checking people in. Commissioner Widmyer asked if the passes are going to be an annual perk. Commissioner Strombeck replied that she believes they will be extending it for Andover residents. Commissioner Strombeck also reported on the Andover Community Center grand opening. 2. Completed Projects: nothing to report 3. On -going Projects: Mr. Haas reviewed the remaining on -going items. Mr. Haas stated he met with residents around Prairie Knoll Park regarding the north parking lot and they all liked the Traditionaire light fixture and varied on the location of the fixtures. Mr. Haas stated staff will be updating the 2018 Park Dedication Study. Mr. Haas said the City will be sending out letters to the neighborhoods around Hawkridge and Woodland Meadows Parks to gather input on playground equipment replacement. 4. On -Hold Projects — nothing to report 5. Other Items of Interest — Tom Anderson Trail is scheduled to be reconstructed in 2021 and Kelsey Round Lake Park in 2022. 6. Parks Maintenance Update: Mr. Haas provided a brief update on parks maintenance performed over the last couple weeks and referred the Commission to the staff report. r I Regular Andover Park & Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes — October 15, 2020 Page 4 CHAIR'S REPORT Commissioner Widmyer stated he is not against pickleball but voted no because he is against moving it up in the CIP and putting it ahead of other park items that should be considered. Commissioner McElhose thanked fire and police for coming out on Night to Unite. ADJOURNMENT Motion by McElhose, seconded by Strombeck, to adjourn the meeting at 7:27 p.m. Motion taken by roll call: Strombeck - aye Miskowiec - aye Lindahl - aye Widmyer - aye Newton- aye McElhose - aye Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully Submitted, Shari Kunza, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Of "Site Secretarial, Inc. PARKAND RECREATION COMMISSIONMEETING-OCTOBER 15, 2020 WORK SESSION MINUTES The Work Session Meeting of the Andover Park and Recreation Commission was called to order by Chair Lindahl on October 1, 2020 at 7:30 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, P -dover, Minnesota. Commissioners Present: Cr Commissioners Kathy McElhose 0 ' -� Miskowiec, Sophia Newton, Gr� Commissioners Absent: Also Present: Ass.. actor, Todd Haas; Pickleball players DISCUSS ADVERTISEMENT POLICYAND AGREEMENT Commissioner Strombeck gave an update as to where she is at with the updating of the advertisement policy and agreement. Commissioner Strombeck indicated that she has met or has talked with a few of the associations regarding what their thoughts are about the cost and what can the associations do to be more responsive to storage of the signs and damage that may occur to the signs from the weather since there has been some issues with that in the past. After some brief discussion by the Commission on signage, there was some discussion on how the fee was determined. Commission Strombeck requested a breakdown of how the $240 was determined by staff. Mr. Haas indicated that he will some research and bring that back at a future meeting once Commission Strombeck is ready to present a proposed draft policy and agreement. No further action was taken. ADJOURNMENT OF WORK SESSION MEETING Motion by Widmyer, seconded by Miskowiec, to adjourn the meeting at 8:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully Submitted, Todd J. Haas, Recording Secretary City of Andover MEMORANDUM D P A FF TO: Mayor and City Council Members Cc: - creation Commission SId gnat in, City Administrator/Finance Director P atK�f rkowitz, City Engineer/Director of Public Works FROA s, Assistant Public Works Director/Parks Coordinator DATE 2020 RE: 2021 Andover Park Dedication Study (Draft) INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to provide the basis for an update to the park dedication fee. A significant portion of the report remains unchanged from the last eraginal study done in 2018 . The biggest change is the update on the amount of improvements that have been completed the past 2 S years since the study was last updated in 2018 2011. The recommended 2021 204 R park dedication fee will be based on these new calculations. The City authorized a park dedication study to be conducted by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. back in 2002 to review city regulations and dedication requirements to determine if current practices were adequately provided for existing and future anticipated park demands. This update te the eFiginal FepeFt and to the 2011 updated study will summarize the objectives of the current Park Plan chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and provide updated inventory information to establish a base line for future dedication needs. Factors including property valuation, service area needs, facility cost analysis, future development and implementation strategies will be reviewed. Recommendations will be set forth establishing mechanisms for the City to provide park facilities in a manner that meets Comprehensive Plan goals, establishes a relationship between park need and development impact and that will build out the system in an equitable manner consistent with Minnesota Statutes and case law. This study excludes analysis of the community regional trail system. ISSUES / ANALYSIS The City's existing park system has been developed based upon the current Comprehensive Plan (which describes land use, transportation, parks and community goals and objectives as well as demographic projections to the year 2040). Andover has been successful in acquiring land during the subdivision process to provide neighborhood and mini parks throughout the community. Athletic fields and other recreation improvements have been provided based upon a combination of City, school district and regional park facilities. The City is in a good position with respect to its park and recreation system in that the variety, location, number and facilities provided by the system meet the national guidelines. The existing Parks and Open Space Chapter of H:ENGINEERI NG/PARKS/201 SPARKSTUDY.doc the Comprehensive Plan utilized both Metropolitan Council and National Recreation and Parks Association' Guidelines to develop the park system standards identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The current City park system meets the national standards (based upon the number of acres of park land provided per 1,000 population), identified by the existing Comprehensive Plan. The City has provided parks throughout the community which allow residents good access to the system and there are a variety of recreational facilities to choose from including natural areas, linear parks, playgrounds and athletic facilities. Andover has also done a good job of mapping and maintaining an inventory of its park facilities and providing clear guidance through the Capital Improvement Project (CIP) process for implementation of future facilities. The purpose of this update to the original park dedication study is to update the cost or value of the Andover ultimate park system and distribute the costs of developing this system equitably to the current and future households and land uses that benefit from the City's park system. The following points summarize the key issues that will affect the City's park system: 1. The Metropolitan Council's build out population forecasted for Andover for both urban and rural areas of the City is anticipated 39,800 41,900 in 2040 and 13,500 16,409 households. Once the Rural Reserve Area population and household numbers have been identified, the park system will be determined at that time along with the gross land area and the number of acres that is considered buildable. When that occurs a separate Park Dedication Study will be required for this area. 2. The community has done a good job of acquiring land for park and recreation purposes and providing equipment/facilities to serve the recreation needs of the City. The location and type of parks within the existing system -generally meet the national standards (suggested by the National Recreation and Park Association), based upon the current population of 32,882 32,335 residents 2( 019 2046 Metropolitan Council estimate). 3. Based upon a staff review of the existing land areas which have been acquired or dedicated to the City over time, staff has identified about 61 acres (Meadowood South, Hartfiel's, Dehn's, Cedar Crest Estates, Creekridge, Birch Ridge, White Oaks, Valley View, Redwood, Landlocked, River Trails, and Cedar Crest) or about 9% of the current total parkland that may never be developed due to topography constraints such as steep slopes, wetlands and/or lakes. 4. The existing park system is predominantly comprised of smaller mini and neighborhood parks which are located throughout the community. Staff has indicated that the number and proximity of smaller parks are expensive to maintain and as such, the City may choose to limit further acquisition of small Previous National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) guidelines were utilized to analyze the park system by park type and the number of acres of parkland per 1,000 population because these guidelines were utilized in the 1999 Park Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. The NRPA is a professional association that provides accreditation programs for universities and advises national lawmakers on policy matters, programs and legislation related to public parks and recreation. H: ENGINEERINGIPARKS12018PARKSTUDY.doc E park sites within the community in favor of larger neighborhood parks or community playfields. 5. The 2010 U.S. Census indicates that over 57.8% of the City's population is comprised of young residents between the ages of 5 to 44 years of age. About 14.3% of the population is comprised of children under 10 years old. The Census figures indicate that the community has a large population of young active residents who typically generate park and recreation demands on the community. Considering the large number of children, teens and young adults, it is anticipated that park and recreation use will be strong for the foreseeable future. The final 2020 U.S. Census will begin theiF analysis n 2018 is not 6. As the community develops and land within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) decline, future growth will occur in the rural service area and the density of development will ultimately decline. While the need for parks will continue to be strong, the financial resources that will be dedicated to the park system are expected to decline. The anticipated decreased density of development in the rural areas will result in a decline in the amount of park dedication fees that will be collected over the long-term. The land supply within the MUSA is limited and the cost of land for park acquisition could be higher than it currently is at some point in the future. The current City park system as calculated by staff contains a total of about 6.31 acres of parkland, which is divided into 69 separate park facilities, (including Andover Station North Ball Field Facility and City Hall Outdoor Hockey Rink Complex). The total value of the park system based upon full build out (including existing and future planned facilities, land costs and 30% design/administration costs) approximates $53,835,901 $49,'�T. The existing park system (including land costs and 30% design/administration costs) is valued at $38,422,815 $43,477,067 with approximately $15,413,086 $16,635,336 (including future land purchases and 30% design/administration costs) of future improvements to be constructed to complete the 2040 Comprehensive Plan park system. 8. The planned park system (based upon the 2040 Comprehensive Plan), is about 71 % 661/e (see Table 6) developed at this time and has been paid for by existing development (through taxes, Community Development Block Grants, other grants and park dedication fees, donations, etc.). As the City is currently about 78% 67°6 developed (IQ .605 49,381 households based upon the 2019 2OW Metropolitan Council's estimate out of the potential 13,50015,400 projected 2040 build out households), existing development has already paid for over 71% 66% of the total planned system. Future development should be responsible to pay for the remaining 29% 3"0 ($15.413,086 $16,625,336) plus a percentage of the existing system (including some facility upgrades), in order to provide for their proportionate share of the total system costs. H:ENGINEERING/PARKS/201 BPARKSTUDY.doc PARK COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The City of Andover Comprehensive Plan including the Parks and Open Space Chapter sets forth goals and objectives for the park system. The objectives of the plan are to: 1. Provide areas that meet present park needs and plan for future needs of the City. 2. Maintain, upgrade and expand community recreational facilities and trail systems to serve all residents of the City. 3. Promote, protect, preserve and enhance the City's rural and open space and amenities. The City of Andover contains 69 parks (including Andover Station North Ball Field Facility and City Hall Outdoor Hockey Rink Complex), ranging in size from under 1 acre to over 152 acres (Kelsey Round Lake Park). Anoka County operates only one Regional Park within the corporate limits of Andover. Anoka County also operates Rum River Central Regional Park that abuts the City along the Rum River near the northwest end of the City. Exhibit A (Park Service Area Map) indicates the location of all of the existing parks and developable planned future parks within the City. The park system contains land areas that are designed to meet varying recreational needs of residents. The parks are classed according to factors including size, use, service area, location and site improvements. These classification systems for local and regional facilities as identified by the Metropolitan Council 2040 Regional Parks Policy plan are as follows: Mini Park. This type of park is intended to provide specialized facilities (facilities include improvements such as playground and fitness equipment) that serve _ a concentrated or limited population or specific group such as tots or senior citizens. Mini parks are typically located within neighborhoods and serve people living within less than % mile of the Park and have an area of 1 acre or less. Note: For the purpose of this study, some parks that exceed 1 acre have been identified as a mini park since the park cannot be developed any more than a specialized facility. Neighborhood Park. This type of facility is intended to provide areas for intense recreational activities such as field games, courts, apparatus areas, skating, etc. The majority of the City parks fall into this classification. The service areas range from %4 to % mile and this type of facility is generally intended to serve a population of 4,000 to 5,000 people. Park sizes for existing Neighborhood Parks within the City range from 1 acre to almost 25 acres. Note: For the purpose of this study, parks that have specialized facilities and 1 field or court have been identified as a neighborhood park. Linear Park. This type of facility is typically developed for one or more varying modes of recreational travel such as hiking, biking, skiing, canoeing etc. There is currently only one Linear Park within the City (Coon Creek Park). The park contains bituminous trails (Tom Anderson Trail) that follows Coon Creek between Hanson Blvd. NW and the Burlington Northern Railroad. Non -motorized uses including biking, hiking, roller H:ENGINEERINGIPARKS12018PARKSTUDY.doc 4 blading and cross-country skiing are permitted in the park. Coon Creek Park contains 44 acres of land. Special Use Park. Special Use Parks are generally areas established to provide specialized or single purpose recreational activities such as golf course, nature center, marina, zoo, display gardens etc. The Crooked Lake Boat Landings and Round Lake are designated as Special Use Parks. Crooked Lake Boat landing has a picnic shelter and boat ramp. Round Lake contains only a boat ramp. Undeveloped Parks. The City has a number of Undeveloped Parks where land has been dedicated or acquired but facilities have not yet been installed or may not have the ability to be installed. The Undeveloped Park areas range from less than 1 acre to over 10 acres in size. Many of the areas contain wetlands and are unsuitable for active plan and/or recreational equipment. Larger areas may be suitable for future trail development. Community PlalffloW These types of parks or facilities are areas for intense recreational facilities such as athletic fields, hockey rinks, skate parks, courts and swimming pools and are in close proximity to secondary schools and other public facilities. These parks serve 3 to 5 neighborhoods or one community. Hawk Ridge Park, Timber Trails Park, Fox Meadows Park, Sunshine Park, Prairie Knoll Park, Shadowbrook East Park, Eveland Fields, Andover Station North Ball Field Facility, Pine Hills North Facility and City Campus Outdoor Hockey Complex would be considered in this category as both are active use parks with recreational facilities designed for league play in baseball, softball, soccer, lacrosse, football and hockey. Note: For the purpose of this study, if a park has at least 2 or more athletic fields and/or rinks, the park has been classified into this category. Community Parks. Community Parks are generally intended to provide areas of natural or ornamental quality for outdoor recreation activities including walking, picnicking. These types of parks could also have some fields and court games. They serve the City as a whole and typically include between 25 to 100 acres of land. Currently one park is designed for community park use which is Kelsey Round Lake Park. This park is designated as a Community Park since it is a passive use park that has extensive natural areas that also contains bituminous, gravel and wood chip nature trails. Regional Parks. Currently there are only two Regional Parks and one Park Conservation Area within or adjacent to Andover and are operated by Anoka County. About half of Bunker Hills Regional Park is located within the corporate limits in the southeast part of Andover and extends into the adjacent cities of Blaine, Coon Rapids and Ham Lake. The Rum River Central Regional Park abuts the City along the Rum River east of County Road 7 and the north side of the Rum River in the City of Ramsey. The Cedar Creek Conservation Area is located just to the west of Aztec Street NW with access from 181st Avenue NW (located on the Andover side of the Rum River across from Rum River Central Park). This Conservation Area is located in both the Cities of Oak Grove and Andover. The portion located in Andover is approximately 93 acres in size. Bunker Hills Regional Parts includes numerous recreation facilities such as picnic H: ENGI NEERI NG/PARKSI2018PARKSTUDY.doc J areas, playgrounds, camping, swimming, walking/biking/hiking and cross-country skiing trails. Rum River Central Regional Park includes numerous recreation facilities such as picnic areas, playgrounds, camping, canoeing, walking/biking/hiking and cross-country skiing trails. Trails. The City has developed a comprehensive regional trail system for the community. This plan is included with the City of Andover's Transportation Plan. The study does however contains interior trail access for the individual parks (where necessary), which is needed to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. Open Space. The Comprehensive Plan identifies open space as a part of the overall park system. Open space is defined as areas set aside for the preservation of natural open spaces to counteract the effects of urban congestion and monotony. Many new citizens cite Andover's natural amenities as a reason for moving into the City. As such, an objective of the Comprehensive Plan is to protect, preserve and enhance the open space character of the City. Currently there are four properties that are identified as Open Space (Martin Meadows Preserve, Dalske Woodlands Preserve, Maple View Preserve and Northwood's Preserve). Note: For the purpose of this study, these four preserves are not included in the determination of the park dedication fee and are funded through the City General Fund and through grants. Scenic Parks. Within the existing park system, there are twelve parks totaling 61.55 acres, currently shown on Exhibit C (Andover Park Facilities Chart) and illustrated on Exhibit B (Andover Park Map) that will not likely be developed due to the fact_ that the land dedication consists primarily of wetlands, lakes, or steep slopes and there is insufficient upland area to develop an active park. These scenic park lands generally fills the classification of Mini and Neighborhood Parks. The specific parks and acreage are identified in Table 1. TABLE 1 SCENIC PARKS PARK NAME PARKS MAP NUMBER I.D. PARK CLASSIFICATION EXISTING ACRES Mini Parks Meadow Wood South 38C UM 0.45 Hartfield's 68D UM 1.47 Dehn's 32C UM 2.23 Cedar Crest Estates 2A UM 0.88 Creekrid a 30C UM 2.76 Subtotal Mini Parks Acrea a 7.79 Neighborhood Parks Birch Ride 19B UN 13.99 White Oaks 13A UN 9.30 Valle View 12A UN 8.74 Landlocked 72D UN 2.25 BPARKSTUDY.doc I River Trails 43C UN 11.41 Redwood Park 79D UN 5.59 Cedar Crest 1A UN 2.48 Subtotal Neighborhood Park Acreage 53.76 Total Scenic Park Acreage 61.55 In addition to the stated park system objectives, the Comprehensive Plan also provides recommendations for park system acreage to accommodate community growth through 2040. Table 2 compares the Comprehensive Plan acreage recommended with the existing park system to illustrate where the City stands in relationship to its build out park system. TABLE 2 PARK TYPE NRPA EXISTING PARK EXISTING SURPLUS/ RECOMMENDED ACREAGE PARK DEFICIT** ACRES *** GROSS ACRES ACREAGE NET AS DETERMINED BUILDABLE* BY STAFF Mini 15.92 55.31 47.52 +31.60 Neighborhood 125.92 162.46 108.70 -17.27 Community 272.35 164.64 164.64 -107.71 Park Community 94.27 188.11 188.11 +93.84 Playfields TOTAL 508.46 1 570.52 508.97 +0.51 Note: There is additional park land (Crooked Lake and Round Lake Boat Landings which are considered Special Use Parks and Coon Creek Park/Tom Anderson Trail along with Shadowbrook West Park Trail which is considered Linear Parks) are not included in Table 2 for a total of 60.49 acres. * These figures represent adjusted acres subtracting out scenic park acreages from Table 1. ** Surplus/Deficit represents Comprehensive Plan acreage recommendations minus existing park acreage net buildable. *** Based on ultimate population build out of 39.800 41,900 (does not include the Rural Reserve Area) City staff indicated that although the existing parkland consists of a multitude of smaller mini and neighborhood parks, the City may not continue acquisition of similar land in the future due to the high cost of maintenance associated with the dispersed locations of these parks within the community. The system is adequate to provide for lands within the projected MUSA boundary. The bulk of the land outside of the ultimate MUSA are planned to develop with 2.5-acre residential lots. The acreage lots provide land area for private recreation purposes that is larger than that typically dedicated for mini parks (1 acres or less). As such, the City may choose to add additional property to some of the mini park areas or look to acquire neighborhood parks in the future. Table 2 and Exhibit A (Park Service Area Map) illustrates that as the City grows within the 2040 MUSA, the current neighborhood parks system provide sufficient acreage and distribution to accomplish the Comprehensive Plan recommendations. Additional community parks or community playfields must yet be acquired and developed. H: ENGINEERING/PARKS/2018PARKSTUDY.doc 7 ANDOVER PARK ACREAGE COMPARISON WITH NATIONAL STANDARDS The existing park system was further analyzed in terms of the service area per 1,000 population guidelines established by the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA). The 2019 294-6 Metropolitan Council's population figure of 32,882 32,335 was used to evaluate the park system acreage. The following Table 3 indicates there are sufficient mini parks, neighborhood parks and community playfield areas. The city is short of community parks. It should be noted that even though Table 3 is deficient in community parks, Bunker Hills Park located in the southeast corner does make up for some of the acreage to satisfy NRPA suggested acres. It also should be noted that the park acreages listed in the "Existing Park Acres" column in Table 3 represent the number of acres of park owned by the City and net park acres that will or do have facilities. However, even when the existing scenic acres are deleted, the existing park system for mini parks, neighborhood parks and community playfields meet or exceeds the park acres suggested by the National Recreation and Park Association Guidelines. TABLE 3 PARK TYPE SERVICE AREA' NRPA STANDARD2 EXISTING PARK ACRES NRPA SUGGESTED ACRES3 GROSS BUILDABLE Mini Park %a Mile .38 ac/1000 55.31 47.52 12.5 42-3 Neighborhood Park %-'/2 Mile 3 ac/1000 162.46 108.70 98.6 97 Community Park 1 2 Mile 1 6.5 ac/1000 164.64 164.64 213.7 24" Community Playfield 2 Mile 2.25 ac/1000 188.11 188.11 7474.4 Total Acres 670.52 508.97 398.8 302,3 ' Metropolitan Council Guideline (Park Facility Service Area) 2 National Recreation and Park Association Guidelines (Acres of Park per 1,000 Population) Note: Although some U. S. Communities still determined there needs for various types of parks as indicated in the Table 3, NRPA has determined Agency Performance Standards should have an average 1 park for every 2281 residents. Park acreage is recommended to be 10 acres per 1000 residents. Based on this NRPA standard, Andover should at least 14 parks with at least a total of 329 acres based on Metropolitan Council's current estimate of 32,882. 3 National Recreation and Park Association Guidelines (Based upon 2019 2846 Metropolitan Council's estimate of 32,882 32,336 . COMMUNITY GROWTH The City's existing and future population and household growth will be compared to City park system value estimates to provide a proportionate park dedication fee. The Andover 2040 Comprehensive Plan forecasts a 2040 population of approximately 39,800 41,900 people in 13,500 15,490 households. This anticipated future development is in both the 2040 MUSA and the City's rural residential areas. Andover's 2019 2016 Metropolitan Council's household count of 10,605 19,391 represent approximately 78% 57.04 of the City's 2040 population forecast. H:ENGINEERI NG/PARKS/2018PARKSTUDY.doc 8 As a requirement of Metropolitan Council approval of Andover's 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the City will be evaluating a Rural Reserve Area Study that identified a Rural Reserve Area for potential future urban growth beyond the current 2040 MUSA. For the purpose of the Park Dedication Study, the Rural Reserve Area is not included here within and will stand on its own if and when the Rural Reserve Area is ready for development. Table 4 illustrates the population and household estimates of the City based upon 2000 and the 2010 U.S. Census data along with the 2019 2915 Metropolitan Council's estimate and 2040 Metropolitan Council's estimate for population and household projections cited in the Comprehensive Plan. The projections for the Rural Reserve Area population and households will be determined at a later date. TABLE 4 ANDOVER POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD ESTIMATES POPULATION HOUSEHOLDS 2000 Census 26,588 8,205 2010 Census 30,598 9,811 2019 2946- 32,882 32235 10,605 10,391 Metropolitan Council's Estimate 2040-Metropolitan 39,800 41,900 13,50015,400 Council's Estimate Rural Reserve Area To be determined at a later To be determined at a date I later date This update to the park dedication study will rely on the following demographic statistics. The City will have a 2040 population of 39,800 41,900 people and a 2040 household count of 13,500 45,409 according to the City's Comprehensive Plan. RESIDENTIAL PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS Exhibit C (Andover - Park Facilities Chart) identifies the park sites pursuant to the City Parks Map. The name and address of each park including existing and future acres, facilities and values are also identified. City Staff provided the list of facilities and corresponding cost estimates. The park system analysis included a land use review to determine the service areas for the existing parks and to identify the proportion of existing and future development that will impact the system. As stated earlier, the current park areas are spread throughout the community and are relatively evenly distributed. Many of the existing parks are located in areas of the community where future development will occur and as such, a proportion of the park infrastructure should be paid for by new development. In fully developed areas in the southern part of the City, improvements to existing parks should be and have been paid for by current development within the service area of the specific park facility. City Staff provided a list of existing and future planned park facilities, which was used to establish the value of the existing park system and to identify costs reasonably expected to complete the future park system based upon full build out contemplated by the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. It should be noted that the information contained herein H: ENGINEERING/PARKS/2018PARKSTUDY.doc J is the best estimate of future facilities that can be made at this time and that the specific market conditions fluctuate. See Exhibit D (City of Andover 2020 201R Existing, Future Park Facilities and Replacement Items Chart) for reference. Based on the estimated value of the complete 2040 park system, Table 6 illustrates that the park system is 71% €6% developed and has been paid for by existing development through taxes, park dedication donations, grants etc. Future development will benefit from the infrastructure that is currently in place and as such, should also be responsible to pay a proportionate share for replacement of the existing system through general taxes, donations, grants, etc. A major component of the park system is land and to determine present land values for Andover. Recent sales indicated that the average value for land within the MUSA approximates $70,000 $60,000 per acre and average land value in the rural service area approximates $13,000 $14,609 per acre. The Anoka County Assessor's database was utilized to establish the land value for park areas that contain a large percentage of wetland or lakes (generally the 61.55 acres of parkland that staff believes will not be developed due to topographic or other constraints). Based on the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) Guidelines, the 2040 park system is sufficient in mini parks, neighborhood parks and community playfields. Based on the NRPA Guidelines it is recommended that 272 acres of Community Park and 94 acres of Community Playfield be available by 2040 as illustrated in Table 2. Based on the NRPA recommendations the City should consider adding 108 acres of Community Park to fulfill the NRPA recommendations. As noted earlier in the study, (see definition on Page 5) these types of parks can have some fields and court games. Table 6 illustrates the value of the planned park system based upon the current Comprehensive Plan which includes the additional Community Playfield. (similar to the Sunshine Park). To calculate the values of the existing and future system, staff utilized the City of Andover Directory of Parks, City Capital Improvements Plan, and research of facility vendors as well as comparable improvements within the City. A list of the future facility acquisitions and values is attached as Exhibit D (City of Andover 2020 204@ Existing, Future Park Facilities and Replacement Items Chart). TABLE 6 PARK SYSTEM ESTIMATED VALUE BASED ON EXHIBIT D NOT INCLUDING THE RURAL RESERVE AREA Total Park System Estimated Value of % of Estimated Value of % of Total Value (including Existing Park Facilities Total Future Park Facilities Park land values and (including land values Park (including land values and System to 30% and 30% Design/Admin System 30% Design/Admin Fees) be Design/Admin Fees) Developed Fees $53,835,901 $38,422,815 71% $15,413,086 29% cee�85 $32,6¢7,649 66% V6,6215,336 34% RENGINEERINGRARKS1201 BPARKSTUDYAoc 10 Park dedication is collected as conditions of subdivision approval. In this respect, the park land dedication fee is estimated on the basis of new housing units or households. Currently, the City has completed approximately 71% 66% of its 2040 park system based on estimated value and future improvements. The actual household count from the 2019 2016 Metropolitan Council's estimate and the future 2040 household count is approximately 78% 67-04 developed (not including the Rural Reserve Area). This indicates that the current park system is behind ea-sshedale in facilities for its current population. Future household growth should pay an equitable share in providing the City's ultimate park system (not including the Rural Reserve Area). To determine the equitable distribution of future park system value to residential units, the ultimate system value is divided by projected household counts. Table 7 represents park dedication fees based on the build out of the 2040 Andover park system. TABLE 7 ESTIMATED PARK VALUE AND DEDICATION FEE W/ 1 ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY BALLFIELD COMPLEXES Estimated Value of # Housing Units yet Park Dedication Fee Future Park Facilities to be built Per Unit 2040 $15,413,086 - 2895 = $5324 $16,626,336 60M $3318 Note: The current 2020 20111 park dedication fee per the City of Andover's 2020 2919 tee.scneclule is 3475 $3139 per unit Exhibit E provides a comparison of park land fees from other metropolitan communities. The suggested fee in Table 7 is comparable when compared with neighboring communities like Blaine. However, the fees are lower than some of the larger, fast- growing communities such as Brooklyn Park, Eden Prairie, and Plymouth. The current system and future planned improvements are consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan. It is fair to assume that the park system will likely continue to be upgraded in the future to maintain the user capacity of the system. The 5324 $3319 per unit charge should reasonably cover the costs for complete development of the system and carrying costs through system build out (not including the Rural Reserve Area). The charge of 5324 $3319 per residential unit is the level of funding that will need to be generated to provide for the planned park system for Andover, based upon implementation of the plan with the lands and facilities described in Exhibit D (City of Andover 2020 2814 Existing, Future Park Facilities and Replacement Items Chart) which are based upon the Comprehensive Park Plan. The 5324 $3349 figure takes into account the park service areas (% of park need associated with new vs. existing development), existing and projected costs for the park system, design/administrative costs and future population/household projections and is therefore our best estimate of park need per unit. It is important to note that the City should continue re-evaluating the system value; current land values and system needs on a periodic basis and adjust the H:ENGINEERING/PARKS/2018PARKSTUDY.doc 11 park dedication accordingly. City Staff suggests that park facilities costs be reviewed and updated annually based upon the Engineering News Record Cost Index. Park maintenance/replacement items and future improvements above and beyond those identified in Exhibit D should not be financed using park dedication funds. The operational and future replacement costs must be budgeted within the City's general funds with costs shared by all community residents. COMMERCIALIINDUSTRIAL PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS Minnesota Statutes and recent case law have identified that Cities must now be able to articulate and justify dedication requirements on a project -by -project basis. Cities have the burden of determining that the park dedication requirement is related to the park benefit that will be derived due to the development. Individualized determinations must be made for each project and the City has the responsibility to demonstrate that there is a reasonable relationship between the dedication requirement and the park needs generated by the development. As illustrated in Exhibit E, many metropolitan communities have a commercial/ industrial park land dedication. The general issue in establishing a commercial/ industrial park land fee is establishing a nexus between commercial and industrial use and the benefit they receive through the City's park system. In the case of Andover, City staff has indicated that the City has no commercial or industrial league programs, with the exception of a couple of local bar/restaurant sponsored tournaments that have occurred in the past. In this respect there is no empirical data that currently illustrates a direct park benefit to the commercial and industrial properties that exists or does not exist. There are discussions that suggest that there is intrinsic benefit to all land uses from a quality park system related to quality of life within a community. The issue at hand is to determine the proportionate need that commercialfindustrial developments generate for the community park system. As City Staff have indicated that there is some tournament play use of athletic fields in the past, it is reasonable to state that commercial/industrial developments have some benefit from the City park system. It is likely that employees of local businesses use parks for lunch breaks, walking and/or recreating. The question is does the commercial development generate the same need on the park system as an equivalent residential development? The proportionate benefit is unknown for the City of Andover, due to the lack of information about the degree to which the commercial/industrial developments use the system. If the City desires to continue collection of commercial/industrial park dedication fees it is suggested to continue collecting a fee structure that approximates charges of other similarly situated communities. Table 8 illustrates commercial park dedication fees which are currently charged by other developing communities. TABLE 8 COMMUNITY $ PER C/I ACRE (BASED ON 2020 206) Blaine $8704 flat fee Brooklyn Park $8000 flat fee H: ENGINEERING/PARKS/201 SPARKSTUDY.doc 12 Coon Rapids $5000 flat fee for Commercial/$4000 for Industrial Eden Prairie $11,500 flat fee Maple Grove $11,000 flat fee Plymouth $8000 flat fee Shakopee WOW $9500 flat fee Woodbury $6000 flat fee Andover $8949 $10,424 less or 10% of Market Value of Land (whichever is The commercial/industrial park dedication fees should follow a calculation equated to residential development on the same property (if followed would increase the current fee of $10,424 $9531 to $15,972 $9957 (3 residential unit's X 5324 $3319) per acre or 10% of market value of the land (whichever is less). SUMMARY • Case law and Minnesota Statutes provide that dedication requirements can only be applied to facilities that will be impacted by the specific project. future park dedication fees cannot be utilized to maintain existing park and trail systems in fully developed neighborhoods unless a correlation can be made between the new development and park use. However, park dedication fees cannot be used to replace equipment within City parks. • The current park system is on schedule in facilities for its current population. In the event that the City extends the MUSA pursuant to the Rural Reserve Area on Exhibit A (Park Service Area Map), additional facilities and land will be needed to accommodate the projected future population. For the purpose of this study, the Rural Reserve Area is not included in the determination of the park dedication fee and will stand on its own if and when the Rural Reserve Area is ready for development. A minimum of at least one additional Neighborhood Park (comparable to the current Sunshine Park) is recommended for the 13,500 15,400 households projected for 2040 (not including the Rural Reserve Area) to be located somewhere in Section 13, 23 and/or 24, Township 32, Range 24. The total planned park system is estimated to cost $53,835,901 $49,'7'z,986 based upon the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, land values, current and projected facility costs. • While the Metropolitan Council's estimated household count represents 78% 672% of its 2040 build out, the City has about 71% 66y6 of its 2040 park system in place. The park system that is in place has been paid for by existing development through taxes, park dedication, donations, grants, etc. As illustrated in Table 7 the City's residential park dedication fees will depend on the City Council's decision on future park improvements and community growth options. H: ENGINEERING/PARKS/2018PARKSTUDY.doc 13 RECOMMENDATIONS The current park system and plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan and as such, the park dedication fee structure for new residential developments should be based upon the analysis provided for in Table 7. Based upon this analysis, a park dedication fee of approximately 5324 $3349 per residential unit and $15,972 $9957 per acre or 10% of market value of the land (whichever is less) for commercial/industrial developments should be instituted to cover build out cost of the City's planned park system and to develop one additional neighborhood park (location to be in the area of Sections 13, 23 and/or 24, Township 32, Range 24). A periodic review of land values and facility costs should be done every 5 years (next updated study would be done in 2025 2929 once the U.S. Census has been completed or as directed by the City Council) to ensure that the park dedication fee remains current based upon market conditions. Staff recommends that the Engineering News Record Cost Index (ENR Cost Index) be utilized in other years as the source to annually update facility values to account for inflationary factors. 2. The City should continue incorporating park redevelopment infrastructure planning as part of the 5-year Capital Improvements Plan. Minnesota Statutes specify that park dedication fees may not be used for maintenance purposes and therefore it is important for the City to continue to provide a separate budget fund for maintenance. However, any park improvements above those identified in Exhibit D will need to be financed outside of the park dedication funds. As the park system ages, there will be an increased need to retrofit existing facilities, as they will have aged beyond their useful life in the older parks. The City will need to continue to pay for replacement of the park system facilities in full developed neighborhoods or park service areas through the general fund or other sources that are available. 3. In the event that the City is contemplating park or facility improvement upgrades in the future that have not been identified in Exhibit D, the City should include these improvements in the Capital Improvement Plan and budget for such improvements out of park dedication fees or other sources that are available. 4. In the event that the City is contemplating park replacements in Exhibit D, the City Council shall approve such replacements and budget for such replacements out of the City's general fund or other sources that are available. Attachments: Exhibit A: Park Service Area Map Exhibit B: Andover Parks Map Exhibit C: Andover — Park Facilities Chart Exhibit D: City of Andover 2020 201 R Replacement Items Chart Existing, Future Park Facilities, and Exhibit E: Survey of Park Dedication Fees based on 2020 2946 results H: ENGINEERINGIPARKS201 SPARKSTUDY.doc 14 a Y w 165TH AVE �i O� 0� V� JP 159T I '1 w 1815T AVE 0 m 0 z 0 w 161 O P a < z P M Legend a ROUND Q Community Park (2) o LAKE Q Community Playfield (11) Q Linear Park (2) 11 S Mini Park (20) Cl Q Q Neighborhood Park(16) d Q Special Use Park (2) N m m Q Undeveloped Mini Park (7) y o �a {r Undeveloped Neighborhood Park (8) 5 a° Q Mini Park Service Area zIa-G Q Neighborhood Park Service Area xay sonren: °z d as Future Community Playfleld (1) City WAntlawr GlB BUNKER LAKE BLVD BUNKER LAKE BL Future Neighborhood Park(1) CIIy WAWowr EWreetlny Dep W.M Rural Reserve XV Debt: fifty, dp City Limits Felwaq=18 wWd L 61 Water 0 1,200 2,400 a,$W Feel AVE KE1 Q � O m } GO 4q C1 r CONSTANCE 9LV0 Lo uat< 11 CITY OF ANDOVER Park Facilities Chart - Exhibit C Park Site Park Type Name Address Existing Acres Future Acres Total Acres Value Per Acre Land Value Value of Existing Facilities(2020) Value of Future Park Facilities Total Park Cost/Value 1A UN Cedar Crest 3680 173rd Ln. NW 2.48 2.48 1 $ 13,000 $ 32,240 $ 290 $ 1,000 $ 33,530 2A UM Cedar Crest Estate 3909 174th Ave NW 0.88 0.88 $ 13,000 $ 11,440 $ - $ - $ 11,440 3A CPL Fox Meadows 16000 Fox St. NW 12.56 12.56 $ 13,000 $ 163,280 $ 452,540 $ 290,000 $ 905,820 4A CPL Hawk Ride 18001 Verdin St. NW 13.14 13.14 $ 13,000 $ 170,820 $ 363,944 $ 1,177,100 $ 1,711,864 5A M Lan seth 3341 174th Ln. NW 1.67 1.67 $ 13,000 $ 21,710 $ 33,691 $ 32,800 $ 88,201 6A N Lund's North 2640 166th Av. NW 4.01 4.01 $ 13,000 $ 52,130 $ 68,071 $ 182,500 $ 302,701 7A CPA Martin's Meadows Park 17101 Navajo St. NW 12.08 12.08 $ 13,000 $ 157,040 $ 2,936 $ - $ 159.976 8A N Pine Hills South 3536 161st Ave. NW 5.08 5.08 $ 13,000 $ 66,040 $ 78,703 $ 108,800 $ 253,543 9A N Timber River 16980 Barium St. 6.78 6.78 $ 13,000 $ 88,140 $ 111,928 $ 7,000 $ 207,068 10A CPL Timber Trails 17761 Aztec St. NW 7.05 7.05 $ 13,000 $ 91,650 $ 331,872 $ 113,500 $ 537,022 11A CPL Pine Hills North 3535 161stAve. NW 42.20 42.20 $ 13,000 $ 548,600 $ 1,178,101 $ 2,046,000 $ 3,772,701 12A UN Valley View 3929 169th Ave. NW 8.86 8.86 $ 13,000 $ 115,180 $ - $ 1,000 $ 116,180 13A JUN lWhite Oaks 2740 172nd Ave. NW 9.24 9.24 $ 13,000 $ 120,120 $ $ 1,000 $ 121,120 19B UN Birch Ridge 1450 181atAve. NW 11.21 11.21 $ 13,000 $ 145,730 $ - $ - $ 145,730 20B M Country Oaks 1065 162nd Lane NW 1.10 1.10 $ 70,000 $ 77,000 $ 60,970 $ - $ 137,970 21B N Forest Meadows 1010 179th Ave. NW 6.63 6.63 $ 13,000 $ 86,190 $ 40,166 $ - $ 126,356 23B UN Oak Hollow 465 159th Ave. NW 5.89 5.89 $ 13,000 $ 76,570 $ 350 $ 1,000 $ 77,920 24B M OakView 15851 Avocet St NW 1.04 1.04 $ 70,000 $ 72,800 $ 38,579 $ 23,000 $ 134,379 25B M Woodland Crossing 15827 Jay St NW 5.21 5.21 $ 70,000 $ 364,700 $ 62,320 $ 40,000 $ 467,020 26B M Woodland Meadows 2139 172nd Ave. NW 0.98 0.98 $ 13,000 $ 12,740 $ 24,972 $ - $ 37,712 286 IM I Maple View Park 1251 167th Ave. NW 0.60 0.60 $ 70,000 $ 42,000 $ 76,578 $ - $ 118,578 29C M 138th Avenue Park Tot Lot 2602 138th Ave. NW 0.40 0.40 $ 70,000 $ 28,000 $ 13,006 $ - $ 41,006 30C UM Creekridge 3216 South Coon Creek Dr 2.76 2.76 $ 70,000 $ 193,200 $ - $ 1,000 $ 194,200 31C SUP Crooked Lake Boat Landing 2980 Bunker Lake Blvd NW 2.51 2.51 $ 70,000 $ 175,700 $ 149,799 $ 8,500 $ 333,999 32C UM Dehn's 14432 Guarani St. NW 2.32 2.32 $ 70,000 $ 162,400 $ - $ 1,000 $ 163,400 33C N Green Acres 14141 Ivywood St. NW 1.08 1.08 $ 70,000 $ 75,600 $ 30,693 $ 7,500 $ 113,793 34C CPL Hidden Creek North 2620 Bunker Lake Blvd NW 8.41 8.41 $ 70.000 $ 588,700 $ 239,612 $ 136,000 $ 964,312 35C M Hidden Creek South 13415 Hidden Creek Dr 0.42 0.42 $ 70,000 $ 29,400 $ 26,068 $ 1,000 $ 56,468 36C CPA Kelsey Round Lake 15521 Xenia St. NW 152.56 152.56 $ 13,000 $ 1,983,280 $ 238,662 $ 1,676,500 $ 3,898,442 37C M Meadowood North 4519 148th Ave NW 0.58 0.58 $ 13,000 $ 7,540 $ 31,578 $ 23,500 $ 62,618 38C UM Meadowood South 4568 147th Lane NW 0.34 0.34 $ 13,000 $ 4,420 $ - $ 1,000 $ 5,420 39C M Meadows of Round Lake 4040 146th Lane NW 0.37 0.37 $ 70,000 $ 25,900 $ 34,680 $ 1,000 $ 61,580 40C N North Woods East 14035 Yukon St NW 2.12 2.12 $ 70,000 $ 148,400 $ 60,938 $ 74,750 $ 284,088 41C N North Woods West 2721 140th Lane NW 3.81 3.81 $ 70,000 $ 266,700 $ 97,144 $ 31,000 $ 394,844 42C M Pleasant Oaks 3857143rdAve 20.29 20.29 $70,000 $ 1,420,300 $ 41,004 $ 26,000 $ 1,487,304 43C UN River Trails 4635 147th Lane NW 12.85 12.85 $ 13,000 $ 167,050 $ - $ 500 $ 167,550 44C N Rose 14057 Rose St NW 4.97 4.97 $ 70,000 $ 347,900 $ 229,809 $ 56,000 $ 633,7,09 45C SUP Round Lake Boat Landing 114604 Round Lake Blvd NW 3.51 3.51 $ 70,000 $ 245,700 $ 4,564 $ 63,500 $ 313,764 46C N Strootman 14575 154th Ave NW 11.37 11.37 $ 13,000 $ 147,810 $ 74,236 $ 127,250 $ 349,296 47C N Terrace 13535 Po St. NW 7.33 7.33 $ 70,000 $ 513,100 $ 161,822 $ 69,750 $ 744,672 48C N Wild Iris 11710 Bunker Lake Blvd NW 11.73 11.73 $ 70,000 $ 821,100 $ 203,916 $ - $ 1,025,016 CITY OF ANDOVER Park Facilities Chart -- Exhibit C Park Type Name Address Existing Acres Future Acres Total Acres Value Per Acre Land Value Value of Existing Facilities (2020) Value of Future Park Facilities Total Park CostfValue rOD N Andover Lions 13790 Sycamore St. NW 19.04 19.04 $ 70,000 $ 1,332,800 $ 105,775 $ 68,750 $ 1,507,325 CPL Andover Station North 1823 139th Lane NW 22.16 22.16 $ 70,000 $ 1,551,200 $ 1,963,835 $ 61,020 $ 3,576,055 M Chesterton Commons 1414 155th Ave NW 0.61 0.61 $ 70,000 $ 42,700 $ 43,429 $ 40,000 $ 126,129 CPL City Campus Outdoor Hockey F 1885 Crosstown Blvd NW 2.52 2.52 $ 70,000 $ 176,400 $ 198,970 $ 2,500 $ 377,870 64D N City Hall ParkComplex/Purple F 1685 Crosstown Blvd NW 6.70 6.70 $ 70,000 $ 469,000 $ 232,625 $ 1,450,000 $ 2,151,625 65D L Coon Creek Park East of Hanson Blvd on C.C. 44.09 $ 70,000 $ 3,086,300 $ $ 2,500 $ 3,088,800 66D M Creek View Crossing 14271 Yellow Pine St. 0.63 $ 70,000 $ 44,100 $ 40,285 $ 1,000 $ 85,385 67D CPL Eveland Fields 2275 Andover Blvd NW 7.01 $ 70,000 $ 490,700 $ 347,883 $ 115,000 $ 953,583 68D UM Hartfiel's Hanson Blvd &Andover Blvd1.59 $ 70,000 $ 111,300 $ - $ 1,000 $ 112,300 69D M Hickory Meadows 300 144th Ave NW M2.15 0.77 $ 70,000 $ 53,900 $ 35,918 $ 45,000 $ 134,818 70D N Hidden Creek East 2156 135th Lane NW 2.76 $ 70,000 $ 193,200 $ 74,259 $ 11,000 $ 278,459 71D N Hills of Bunker West 1557 139th Lane NW 6.76 $ 70,000 $ 473,200 $ 82,663 $ 93,500 $ 649,363 72D UN Landlocked 15543 Prairie Rd 2.15 $ 70,000 $ 150,500 $ - $ - $ 150,500 73D UM Moores Estates 905 Crosstown Blvd. NW 0.76 0.76 $ 70,000 $ 53,200 $ - $ 131,000 $ 184,200 74D M Nordeen's 15535 Juniper St. NW 0.85 0.85 $ 13,000 $ 11,050 $ 44,167 $ - $ 55,217 75D N Oak Bluff 14757 Bluebird St. NW 3.79 3.79 $ 70,000 $ 265,300 $ 79,238 $ 36,000 $ 380,538 76D CPL Prairie Knoll 14800 Prairie Rd NW 19.38 19.38 $ 13,000 $ 251,940 $ 742,107 $ 341,000 $ 1,335,047 77D UM Red Oaks East 14045 Nightingale St. NW 3.55 3.55 $ 70,000 $ 248,500 $ - $ 2,500 $ 251,000 78D M Red Oaks West 14058 Raven St. NW 2.96 2.96 $ 70,000 $ 207,200 $ 39,210 $ 1,000 $ 247,410 79D UN Redwood 13977 Bluebird St. NW 5.82 5.82 $ 70,000 $ 407,400 $ - $ - $ 407,400 80D CPL Shadowbrook East 13757 Butternut St. NW 15.03 15.03 $ 70,000 $ 1,052,100 $ ' 260,130 $ 300,000 $ 1,612,230 81 D L Shadowbrook West Bunker Lake Rd & Goldenrod St 10.38 10.38 $ 70,000 $ 726,600 $ - $ - $ 726,600 82D M Shady Knoll 2352 U lander St. NW 1.52 1.52 $ 70,000 $ 106,400 $ 31,954 $ 56,000 $ 194,354 83D M So hies 1170 152nd Lane NW 1.51 1.51 $ 70,000 $ 105,700 $ 70,646 $ 50,000 $ 226,346 84D CPL Sunshine 1900 Crosstown Blvd. NW 38.65 38.65 $ 70,000 $ 2,705,500 $ 1,825,779 $ 273,500 $ 4,804,779 85D M The Oaks 14431 Crosstown Blvd. NW 1.33 1.33 $ 70,000 $ 93,100 $ - $ - $ 93,100 86D M Woodland Estates 2363 152nd Lane NW 0.26 0.26 $ 70,000 $ 18,200 $ 22,804 $ 1,000 1 $ 42,004 49C M Crooked Lake School $ - $ 61,711 $ - $ 61,711 FP Future Neighborhood Park $ 442,500 $ 442,500 FP Future Community Play Field Area $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Subtotal 631.00 631.00 $ 24,295,810 $10,866,927 $ 11,856,220 $47,018,957 Design/Administrative Fee (30%) 1 1 1 30% 30% Total System Cost $ 24,295,810 $14,127,005 $ 15,413,086 $ 53,835,901 Note: Subtotal of existing acreage for Crooked Lake School of 0.74 acres is not included since facilities are located on school district property EX/41, 61' 1- E 2020 Park Dedication Rate Comparison City Andover 2019 Residential $3,415 2020 Residential $3,475 2019 $10,246 /Acre or 10%of FMV, whichever is less 2020 $10,4241 Acre or 10%of FMV, whichever is ten Apple Valley $1.935 - Single Family, $3,509.69 - Townhouse, $3,342.50 - Multi $1,935 - Single Family, $3,509.69 - Townhouse, $3.342.50 - Multi $1,272 11,000 Sq. Ft: Retail, $1881,5011,000 Sq. Ft. -Office, $636.00 11.000 Sq. Ft- Institutional $1,272 11,000 Sq. FL- Retail, $1881 SO f 1,000 Sq. FL -Office, $636.00 / 1,ODD Sq. Ft- Institutional Blaine $4,320 $4.449 $8,7041 Acre $8,704/Acre Bloomington $5,700 $5,700 $58511,000 Sq. Ft. $585 / 1,000 Sq. FL Brooklyn Center $0/Acre $0/Acre $0 $0 Brooklyn Park $4.600 $4,600 $6,000/Acre $8,000/Acre Burnsville $2.717 $2.717 $17.500/Acre $17,500/Acre Chanhassen $5.800 - Single Family, $5.000-Duplex. $3,800-Multi $5,800 - Single Family, $5,000 - Duplex, $3,800-Multi $12,500/Acre $12,500/Acre Champlin 54,370 $4.370 $8,3231 Acre $8,3231 Acre Cottage Grove $3,400 $3.400 $6,000/Acre $6,000/Acre Eagan $3,579 $3.722 $939 / 1,000 Sq. Ft. $977 / 1,000 Sq. Ft. Eden Prairie $6,500 $6,500 $11.500/Acre $11,500/Acre Falcon Heights 8% 8% 10%FMV 10%FMV Fridley $1,500 $1,500 $.023 / SF $.023 / SF Golden Valley 6% 6% 6% FMV 6% FMV Inver Grove Hights $2,850 $2,850 $7,000/Acre $7,000/Acre Lakeville Low Density: 54,294, Medium Density:$2,922, High Denslty: $2,240 Low Density: $4,509, Medium Density:$3,068, High Density: $2,352 $7, 6931 Acre $7,6931 Acre Little Canada $3.500 $3,500 7% FMV or 10%of Land 7% FMV or 10% of Land Maple Grove $4.262 $4.177 $11,000/Acre $11,000/Acre Maplewood $3,540 $3,540 9%FMV 9%FMV Moundsview $3,500 $3,500 10%FMV 10%FMV Oakdale $2,886 $2,BBfi Retail $46711,000 Sq. Ft., Office: $534 1,000 Sq. Ft. Retail $467 11,000 Sq. Ft., Office: $534 1,000 Sq, Ft. Plymouth $8.000 $8,000 $8,000/Acre 58,000/Acre Richfield $0 $0 $0 $0 Roseville $4,000 $4,000 10%FMV 10%FMV Shakopee $5,340 $5.340 $9,500/Acre $9,500/Acre Shoreview 4% 4% 10%FMV 10%FMV St. Louis Park $1,500 $1,500 5%FMV 5%FMV Woodbury $3,500 $3,500 56,0001 Acre $6,000/Acre Average $3,319 $3,329 CITY OF ANDOVER Park Dedication Rates 2009-2020 2009 $2,944.00 2010 $2,935.00 $ (9.00) -0.31% 2011 $2,935.00 $ -- 0.00% 2012 $2,650.00 $ (285.00) -9.71% 2013 $2,732.00 $ 82.00 3.09% 2014 $2,810.00 $ 78.00 2.86% 2015 $2,899.00 $ 89.00 3.17% 2016 $2,952.00 $ 53.00 1.83% 2017 $3,038.00 $ 86.00 2.91% 2018 (January) $3,180.00 $ 142.00 4.76% 2018 (June) $3,319.00 $ 281.00 9.25% 2019 $3,415.00 $ 96.00 2.89% 2020 $3,475.00 $ 60.00 1.75% 2021 (Proposed) $5,324.00 $ 1,849.00 53.21% Nightirgale Meadows .. 11111111111111111111 256TH UN ' j2381333 2307 15584 2148 2114 2046 ou 2386 2318 2288 F2210 15532 1957, 15394 2325 I 86 2279 2217 I 2165 I 2077 I 15450 15474 15476 j 15466 4 2320 2272 2210 2170 2120 2060 15416 Cl� 15405, 15370 if 2309 2241 IJ�Bh�fx$glc r199755 �l/j M ea dewg 2159 1984 15330 2324 2274 2226 15318 15: 15284J i��or 15262 r l 1900 233i4 2292 15282 15276 15278 15279 15263 15269�15269--� J 5210 15245 15258. 15260 15262ff2CF45 152 13237 63 2222 2178 2148 2074 2018 9 2321 265 2209 2163 2135 2089 2047 2019 1990 338 2278 36 2- 8�2 2144 j 22I73 2237 2183 2155 U 2284 J 192 1845 653 32 �2272 2224-� 2 4 2164 �ea� �a►�J ES#s j Park &Sell parK Date Created: October 02, 2020 Disclaimer: The provider makes no representation or warranties with respect to the reuse of this data. TAMARACK 1,1AI) DrA I I OPMEN 1 1536 Beachcomber Blvd. Waconia, MN 55387 October 22, 2020 City of Andover Planning and Zoning Commission 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 To the Andover Planning Commission members, Over the past few months, Tamarack Land Development, LLC has coordinated with Andover city staff to design Nightingale Meadows, which we are pleased to submit for your consideration. The development site is 9.4 acres and will be subdivided into 22 single-family residential lots. We are proposing 65' lots to meet the increased demand for this size lot, which accommodates popular villa homes. An example of the type of home we propose for the development is attached. We feel a quality -built villa home priced at or above $400,000 would be a welcome addition to the Andover real estate market. The cul-de-sac is temporary until the neighbor to the west chooses to develop at which point that developer will deconstruct the cul-de-sac and connect to Quinn. The privacy of existing homes will be maintained through extensive screening, and we intend to leave the tree line on the edge of the property intact as much as possible. Our development plan provides several benefits over the existing vacant land condition including: 1. An efficient use of land for single family residential construction that enables greater community engagement and interaction. 2. An in -demand housing product type which appeals to a variety of home buyers and enhances the visual interest of the area. 3. All lots can be serviced by existing city sanitary and water. We look forward to working further with City staff to develop this beautiful area of Andover, MN. S�cerely, Dale Willenbrin ,Owner Tamarack Land Development, LLC \ l \ 'i/— —L-- ® ---� 130'LANDSCAPE/ TREE PRESERVAT70N BUFFERjV \\` JA \ ,yam w.r� asay. sass 13 \ t 22 pit- � I i LN ta / . �. it t 1� xi JOUTLOT FUTUR W i 04 c. / I I I _ _ _ ' `" <. OF) -��.IL 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV TO: Park & Recreation Commission CC: David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public Works/City Engineerl3 FROM: Todd J. Haas, Asst. Public Works Director TAW" SUBJECT: 6. Review Outstanding Items/Maintenance Update DATE: November 5, 2020 Issues list as of 10/30/20 UPDATE OFANDOVER COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY BOARD — Commissioner Strombeck will provide an update at the meeting. COMPLETED PROJECTS — ON -GOING PROJECTS - • Update of Park Dedication Improvement Fund Ouarterly Report — Item is on the agenda in January. • Update of Ouarterly Sheriff's Department Report on Park Patrol & Vandalism — Item is on the agenda in January. • Prairie Knoll Park North Parking Lot Improvements — The plans and specs for the parking lot will be prepared over the winter months. The construction of the parking lot is scheduled in 2021. As far as lighting of the north parking lot, input from the neighbors has been provided to the City Council and it has been approved to install 5 Traditionaire Security Lights as per the original plan. The lights will be installed as part of the construction of the parking lot. • Update of the 2021 Park Dedication Study — Item is on the workshop portion of the agenda. • Sunshine Park Playground Equipment Replacement — The playground equipment has been selected by the Park and Recreation Commission. Staff will order the equipment with the Hawkridge and Woodland Meadows Park playground equipment replacement projects so all the equipment can be delivered at the same time which should provide some savings on freight costs. • Hawkridge Park Playground Equipment Replacement — The public informational meeting with the neighborhood has been scheduled for the December 3, 2020. The survey results from the neighborhood will be discussed. • Woodland Meadows Park Plavground Equipment Replacement -- The public informational meeting with the neighborhood has been scheduled for the December 3, 2020. The survey results from the neighborhood will be discussed. • Bike Youth/Trail — The City Council has reviewed and approved the recommendation from the Park and Recreation Commission to move forward with constructing a trail through the wooded area at the south end of Sunshine Park near Well Pumphouse #6. Location of the trail has been identified and tree and brush removal will begin over the winter months. Signage identifying the rules/guidelines and direction of travel will be made over the winter with installation to be done sometime in the spring. To keep the bikers from crossing and damaging the maintained lawn areas by the Well Pumphouse #6, a fence may need to be installed. Staff will be looking at where the trail entrance should be located which most likely will be located on the east side of the wooded area by the existing paved trail and parking lot area. Pickleball Update — The City Council has approved the to move forward with hiring a consultant to prepare a study to look at costs in 2021 which will identify options for the location of the courts and how many courts should be built along with other amenities that could be considered (parking lot and access, benches, shelter, etc.). The cost of the study will be funded from the park improvement fund. The City Council is not requiring the pickleball community to help fund the study. ON -HOLD PROJECTS — None at the time. OTHER ITEMS OFINTEREST— • _Update of Pedestrian Trails: Trails that are planned to be reconstructed when maintenance funding becomes available over the next couple years. Due to funding, these trails have been pushed out a year: 4- 2021 — Tom Anderson Trail (along Coon Creek east of Hanson Blvd) ❖ 2022 -- Kelsey Round Lake Park Trail The City Council has reviewed the engineering consultant analysis report recently regarding proposed Railroad Underpass trail to connect internal developments from Winslow Cove 2nd Addition to the east side of the railroad to determine if the project is feasible. Staff has been discussing with a potential developer regarding a possible cost share to construct the railroad underpass. Also, more information is being requested from BNSF before a final decision is made on the project. • Update of Scheduling Park and Recreation Commission meeting at a City Park or Facility — The Commission will need to determine if you would like to have a meeting at one of the City parks in 2021. If you have any questions or comments regarding any of the items mentioned above or any items relating to parks or projects, feel free to contact Todd Haas or Dave Berkowitz at the City. Staff recommends the Commission continue reviewing the City Council meeting minutes that you receive by e-mail as to discussions of various projects the City Council has been working on or is considering. Note: If you have any items that you would like to add to the list, let me know at the meeting. 10/16/20 • Completed trash and recycling service for all parks and trails. • Mowed all parks. • Started winterization of irrigation systems and pulled meters. • Painted over graffiti on the Tom Anderson Trail. • Blew off leaves and debris on some of the trails. • Moved trail cameras and put new batteries in them. • Cleaned up leaves at City Hall entrance. • Removed volleyball nets. • Removed flag and solar light at Andover Station North for the season. 10/23/20 • Completed trash and recycling service for all parks and trails. • Continued winterization of irrigation systems. • Removed flags at Sunshine Park for season. • Continued playground inspections and repairs. • Removed Crooked Lake Boat Landing dock on 10/22. • Set up and prepared plows for snow removal and marked plow routes. • Removed the Nordeen's basketball hoop and backboard for the season. • Flail mowed and tilled the Community Garden. • Snow removal of trails on 10/21/20 after 7"+ of snow on 10/20/20. • Opened trail gates for the winter plow season. • Cleaned and organized around the shop. 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV TO: Park and Recreation Commission CC: David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public Works/City Engineer"�b�g FROM: Todd J. Haas, Assistant Public Works Director/Parks Coordinator SUBJECT: A. Discuss Draft 2021 Park Dedication Study DATE: November 5, 2020 The Park and Recreation Commission is requested to discuss the draft 2021 Park Dedication Study. A draft copy of the 2021 Park Dedication Study is in the side pocket of your packet for review. City Council directed staff to update the Park Dedication Study to determine what the new fee could be based on the future improvements that have been recommended by the Park and Recreation Commission and approved by the City Council. Based on the updated study, the new calculated fee would be $5,324 per unit for residential and $15,972 per acre or 10% of the market value of the land for commercial/industrial property (whichever is less). The current Park Dedication fee is $3,475.00 residential and $10,424.00 per acre for commercial/industrial. The main highlights of the report are as follows: • The Rural Reserve area is not included in the study. If the Rural Reserve area develops, a separate study will need to be developed which will provide recommendations on the various types of parks that could be included in the area and what the park dedication fee should be for developing those parks. • Based on the Metropolitan Council predicted buildout of the City and the surplus of Mini parks, it is recommended that no additional land for Mini parks be taken as part of the park dedication requirements. See Table 2 of the study. • Based on the Metropolitan Council predicted buildout of the City, even though there is a surplus of 5.24 acres of Neighborhood Parks, the Park and Recreation Commission recommended in the last study (2018) one additional Neighborhood Park near the east - central part of the City somewhere in Sections 13, 23, or 24 Township 32 Range 24. This was also noted in the 2011 Park Dedication Study. Is the Commission still interested in pursuing a park in this general vicinity? • Based on the Metropolitan Council predicted buildout of the City, Community Parks are deficient by about 120 acres but as indicated in Page 8 of the study, Bunker Hills Park does make up for some if not all the acreage to satisfy NRPA suggested recommended acres. • Based on the Metropolitan Council predicted buildout of the City and the surplus of Community Playfields as identified in Table 2 of the draft study, it is recommended that no additional land for Community Playfields (example like Sunshine Park) be taken as part of the park dedication requirements. The actual household count from the 2019 Metropolitan Council estimate and the estimated 2040 household count is indicating the City is approximately 78% developed (not including the Rural Reserve Area). The City has completed approximately 71 % of its identified 2040 park system based on estimated value and future improvements. This indicates that the current park system is behind with the City's current population. In 2018, the park system was on schedule with the population which was based on the Metropolitan 2016 household numbers. Note: The reason for this is due to the number of households based on the Metropolitan Council's estimate in 2016 of 15,400 has now been reduced by Metropolitan Council to a new estimate for 2019 to 13,500. Based on the draft Park Dedication Study and the new calculated fee that has been identified, the substantive 53% fee increase will not be well received by the City Council and development community. The Council may be willing to increase a percentage of the current fee based on history of increases but until the Council weighs in it may be hard to determine what that percentage would be. Based on past park dedication fees approved by Council since 2009, the highest increase of the fee was 9.25%. To bring proposed fee of $5,324 down to a more palatable fee, the Park and Recreation Commission will need to consider options to be recommended to the City Council. Possible options are as follows: Reduce Future Improvements by $4.4 million. This would get the fee increase to 10%. Reduce Future Improvements by a specific amount and by phasing in Park Dedication fee increase (for example by 10%) over the next several years. Propose a percentage increase from the existing 2020 fee of $3475 and re-evaluate in 2 years. Note: If the Park and Recreation Commission members have other options that they would like to recommend to Council, please be prepared to provide those options at the meeting for discussion. The following items are included in the draft 2021 Park Dedication Study: ➢ Exhibit A — Park Service Area ➢ Exhibit C — Park Facilities Chart ➢ Exhibit E — Survey of Park Dedication Fees based on 2020 results The following items are not included with this item: ➢ Exhibit B -- Andover Parks Map ➢ Exhibit D — 2020 Existing and Future Park Facilities Chart The Park and Recreation Commission is requested to review the updated 2021 Park Dedication Study. Respectfully submitted, Todd J. Haas Attachments: Draft 2021 Park Dedication Study (side pocket of packet)