HomeMy WebLinkAboutWK - May 28, 2019ANAWVA�
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
City Council Workshop
Tuesday, May 28, 2019
Council Chambers
1. Call to Order— 6:00 p.m.
2. Code Amendment Discussions
A. Side Yard Setbacks for Single Family -Urban R4 - Planning
B. Front Yard Setbacks For Swimming Pools — Rural RI - Building
3, 2020-2024 CIP Discussion
A. Discuss Street Reconstruction — Engineering
B. Discuss Potential New Trail Projects — Engineering
4. 2020 Budget Development Discussion —Administration
5. 2019 Budget Progress Reports —Administration
6. 2019 City Investments Review—Administration
7. Other Business
8. Adjournment
1
C IT l O 1
ND 60VE
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: Joe Janish, Community
SUBJECT: Discussion: Side Yard Setbacks Single Family -Urban R4
DATE: May 28, 2019
BACKGROUND
After a recent variance approval by the City Council, staff was directed to bring this item
forward to a work session for further discussion. The current ordinance language allows for a
home to be 10 feet from an interior lot line while the garage is allowed to be 6 feet from the
interior lot line in the Single Family -Urban (R4) zoning district.
Based on definitions and required setbacks any living portion (principal structure) of a home has
a side yard setback of 10 feet. This includes a "bonus room" which is livable space above a
garage. The garage (considered accessory even if attached by definition) is allowed to be 6 feet
from the property line. In the recent variance request the applicant desired to build above his
existing garage to provide for additional living space 6 feet from the property line.
Staff surveyed several of the surrounding communities (Anoka, Blaine, Coon Rapids, Ramsey,
Oak Grove) for review by the City Council this evening.
Of the communities surveyed Anoka, Coon Rapids, and Ramsey have different side yard
setbacks depending on the garage side vs. the living side.
Front Yard
side Yard
Omer Lot
Rear Yard
Min Lot
Lot Width
Lot width Omer
Lot Frontage
Min Depth
,;_Mdover
R4
35
10/6
35
30
11,400
80
100
50
130
Anoka*
Blaine
Coon Rapids-
1i
R -]AA
iR-1A
30
30
35
10
10
10
20
20
25
30
30
30
10,000
10,800
12,150
80
8o
90
90
100
60
60
125
125
135
Anoka*
Coon Rapids-
Oak Grove
R1
LDR-1 1DR_2
IC --3
2-1
25
40 35
30
30
10/5
15/10 10/5
10
10/6
25
20 20
20
30
25
so 35
10
30
10,000
15,000 10,800
10,000
10,800
75
100 80
80
85
110 90
90
50
60
120
150 135
50
'living space vs. attached
garage
^habitable vs uninhabitable
K
Talking with staff at the communities that allow for a smaller setback for the side of the home
that has a garage, they have indicated the purpose may be for privacy, sound, and potentially
reduce the impacts to drainage and utility easements.
Anoka indicated they would enforce their ordinance similar to ours; however, they did note some
developments that do have living space above the garages.
Coon Rapids indicated they would also enforce their ordinance similar to how we are currently.
Ramsey has not yet responded to the three inquires about the differences.
HISTORY
During the Summer of 1986 the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council had
discussions related to lot sizes, setbacks and house sizes. Concerns where related to "running out
of land", too small of homes, and too small lots.
On December 16`h, 1986 The Andover City Council changed the setback for a "Residential
Garage or Carport from interior lot line" from 10 feet to "Residential garage or carport over 20
feet wide, from interior lot line or to save trees" to 6 feet; with the adoption of Ordinance No.
8NN.
Review of the minutes during that time indicate the concerns included obtaining larger homes on
80 lots, due to the change in house plans and desires of the builders and future residents.
Potential "Benefits" if Code is Changed
• Larger homes (more square footage) could be constructed on the current sized lots.
• Homeowners may add onto their home above the garage.
• Residents may consider additions to their homes over moving.
Potential "Negatives" if Code is Changed
• The addition above a garage may change the character of the neighborhood.
• A 6 foot side yard setback with living space (principal structure) could impact the
drainage and utility easement area (typically 5 feet).
o For Example: Basement egress windows in a full basement are required to be a
minimum of 3 feet by 3 feet in size. This would equal to a 2 foot encroachment
into the drainage and utility easement.
o City Code 12-4-3 (attached) allows for several encroachments into setbacks.
These encroachments could encroach into the drainage and utility easement.
• Reduction in privacy as living spaces (principal structures) could be closer together.
Allowing for living space to be at 6 feet means neighbors living spaces could be 12 feet
apart vs. 20 feet apart.
• Reducing the distance between living spaces could cause individuals to hear more noise
from house to house.
• Additional costs to construction. Building code has additional requirements as homes are
moved closer to property lines.
o For Example: Additional fire protections are required as a home gets closer to a
property line.
DISCUSSION
After the approved variance request, City Council desired to review this item to discuss if a
change is desired at this time.
ACTION REQUIRED
Staff recommends the City Council provide direction if a desire exists to allow for the principal
structure to be located 6 feet from the property line on the garage side of a home for all of the
properties in the R-4 Single Family -Urban zoning district.
Resp ct lly lt
ub itted,
Joe anish
Community Development Director
Attachments
November 18, 1986 City Council Minutes
December 2, 1986 City Council Minutes
December 16, 1986 City Council Minutes
Ordinance 8NN
Page
.4
7
9
CITY of ANDOVER
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 18, 1986
MINUTES
14
The Regular Bi -Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by
Mayor Jerry Windschitl on November 18, 1986, 7:30 p.m., at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota.
Councilmen present: Elling, Knight, Lachinski, Orttel
Councilmen absent: None
Also present: City Attorney, William G. Hawkins; Planning and Zoning
Commissioner, Maynard Apel; City Engineering Technician,
Todd Haas; City Administrator, James Schrantz; and
others
Itsuggested the following items be added to the Agenda: Item 4e, Elementary
School te; 4f, Hanson Boulevard Right -Of -Way; and 4g, Interest on Special
Assessmen
MOTION by Ort Seconded by Lachinski, that we approve the Agenda as amended.
Motion carried un imously.
DONNA GREEN LOT SPLIT
Commissioner Apel reviewed eir recommendation to approve the Lot Split request
of Donna Green on Bunker Lake ulevard. Council questioned how the split
affects the proposed preliminary at once approved for that property.'
Donna Green - stated she is selling t 3.2 acres as shown on the proposed plat.
eso owns the 15 remaining acres. T small lot on the other side of the
creek has always had a separate PIN number is not apart of this request.
Council determined because no new lots were crea d but it is a matter of
shifting lot lines, that no park dedication fees ar due. Also, certificates
of survey will be needed for both lots.
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Elling, introducing a resolu n approving a lot
sp it as requested by Donna Green for the property known as 2 Bunker Lake
Boulevard as presented, but strike the paragraph, "BE IT FURTHER SOLVED that approval
is contingent upon the payment of park dedication fees."; and subjec to receipt
of certificate of survey with the legal descriptions. (See Resolution 96-86)
Motion carried unanimously.
ORDINANCE 8, SECTION 6.02 AMENDMENT
Mayor Windschitl suggested the setbacks required in the surrounding cities be
researched to determine whether Andover's setbacks are comparable. Canmissioner
Apel noted the only changes to the ordinance were to change the rear yard setbacks
for LB from 30 to 40 to be in line with the setbacks in the other districts, and
to place an asterisk by each setback to be sure it is referenced to Ordinance 8,
Section 4.14.
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Elling, an amendment amending Ordinance 8, known as
tie ming Ordinance of the City of Andover, as presented. Motion carried
unanimously.
5
Regular City Counci, Meeting
December 2, 1986 - Minutes
Page 2
Because a developers were not present, it was agreed to table these
Items.
MOTION by Knight, conded by Orttel, to table the items until the
developers are In at dance. Motion carried unanimously.
Chairman Jacobson noted the owner not in attendance at the
hearing, but the Planning Commission r ommended approval of the
rezoning.
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Lachinski, Ordin>Zon
an
Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 8, known as thOrdinance of
the City of Andover as presented (Lot 5, Watt'res from
General Industrial to R-4, Residential Single FMo carried
unanimously.
iu_.i_lY__I__
Chairman Jacobson reported no one attended the public hearing on the
proposed amendment to Section 6.02 to reduce the sideyard setback in
the R-4 zone to 5 feet. The Planning Commission strongly felt that
the setback should not be decreased. They are recommending instead
If Increased width is needed to build larger houses or three -car
garages, that the lot width be Increased to 85 feet. The Commission
discussed the desire for larger houses and/or three -car garages and
did not have a problem with that. But they did not feel the
additional cost of an 85 -foot lot would deter such construction.
Chairman Jacobson stated the Commissioners had very definite feelings
opposing the reduce sldeyard setback. Many did not like the
aesthetics of houses placed closer together, and they were also
concerned that the 5 -foot setback would become the norm rather than
only for the larger houses. They also felt that people move to
Andover for the space and amenities It has, and they did not want to
compromise that with this proposed change.
Mayor Wlndschltl argued most of the other cities around allow the
5 -foot setback. He also felt It is to the City's benefit to encourage
the construction of the larger houses and three -car garages because of
the additional tax revenue it brings to the City. If a larger house is
desired on a lot of record, there is no way of fitting it on the lot
unless the sldeyard setback is reduced.
Councilman Knight stated in viewing developments where the 5 -foot
setback Is allowed, he is Inclined to feel the 5 -foot setback is not
enough. He preferred the Planning Commission's proposal of the
85 -foot lot width.
I
Regular City Council Meeting
December 2, 1986 - Minutes
Page 4
(Transient Merchant Ordinance, Continued)
Council agreed to change Section 1, Definitions, Item 3), sixth line,
to: "...provided, however, that such definition shall also Include any
person who occupies any temporary structure, vehicle or other
place..."
Another change agreed to was Section 3, Exclusions, Item A):
"Occupations licensed and/or bonded pursuant to state law."
Discussion was then on Section 4, Religious and Charitable
Organizations. There was some concern about the application of this
ordinance to sales for various fundraisers by school children In
neighborhoods, suggesting they be exempted from the ordinance.
At this time the Council was introduced to members of the Boy Scouts
Troop 601 that were attending the meeting.
Discussion then returned to the proposed Transient Merchant Ordinance.
A suggestion was to Insert language which would exempt local
educational institutions from the ordinance. It was agreed to table
the item to the next regular meeting, at which time each Councilman
will note his suggestions on the ordinance.
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Lachinski, to table the item for two
weeks. Motion carried unanlamously.
Counct n Knight was concerned that the City plan for the future
growth In 1ving the areas of police and fire service, city services,
commercial elopment, and sewer and water services, though he felt
the discussion t the last special meeting generally covered the area
of sewer and wate ervices. He suggested each Councilman take an
area of concern, res rah and analyze It, and make recommendations to
the Council.
After some discussion, it wa agreed to hold a special meeting first
to discuss the overall philosophy and framework of each area.
Marian Heidelberger - was concernedout the offices now in the
Senior Citizen Center, asking if any mo are going to be put in.
They are concerned that they will be loos the use of the Center.
Council assured her the Senior Citizen Cente wi}I always be available
for the senior citizens. The offices are actua4ky in what used to be
the garage and are only there because of the lack space at this
time. That is one of the Items that would be addresbkd.
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by E111ng, to set a Special Mee ng for
December 9 on this matter. Motion carried unanimously.
7
Regular City Counc,, Meeting
December 16, 1986 - Minutes
Page 7
Several developers were before the Council with house plans to
Illustrate the problems they have on various lots because of the
City's 10 -foot sideyard setback. Tony Emmerich stated they try to
avoid loading up the front garages. They get Into a lot of the
70 -foot houses, which do not fit on an 80 -foot lot with the 10 -foot
sideyard setbacks. Also, the sizes of houses continue to Increase, as
they'd like to attract the $150,000+ houses In their project.
Ron Smith noted his best selling house for this year cannot be built
In Andover because of the setbacks, feeling Andover should be
competitive in the construction market. A reduced sldeyard setback
would make the City competitive.
John Peterson explained a situation where an Individual purchased a
lower priced lot and decided to build a 1124 SF house valued about
$90,000 to $100,000. It is a 40 -foot house with a 22 -foot garage.
That will not fit on an 80 -foot lot and still meet the 10 -foot
sideyard setbacks on either side. So the Individual has decided to
reduce the size of the garage to make it fit. He asked if that makes
any sense.
Mr. Peterson also stated they have 80-, 85-, 90-, 95-, and 100 -foot
lots where it would be desirable to have a lesser setback to save the
trees on the lot. If the objective is bigger houses and more expensive
developments, the way to do it is to go with the five-foot setbacks.
An 85 -foot lot costs about $1500 more than an 80 -foot lot. He also
felt if the City increased the minimum lot size to 85 feet that the
end result would be slightly less house, leaving the $1500 off the
cost of the house.
Darrel Fults, realtor of vacant lots, also noted Instances where It
would be advantageous to reduce the sideyard setbacks to accommodate
the house, asking if the Council would rather have the setback or a
three -car garage on the house.
Councilman Elling was not In favor of a reduced setback, thinking a
lot of people like the open space and larger lots. And he didn't think
that $1500 would be the deciding factor in whether or not a larger lot
or larger home would be acquired. He also didn't like the aesthetics
of houses placed closer together. He thought if there is a problem on
a lot that it could be dealt with through the variance procedure.
The developers argued the variance procedure would not be effective
because the new home owners would not or could not take the time
required to go through that process, which can take up to six weeks.
Councilman Knight was concerned that with a five-foot setback and with
one- or two -foot eaves, theoretically there could only be six feet
between houses.
N
Regular City Council Meeting
December 16, 1986 - Minutes
Page 8
(Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 Amendment, Continued)
Mayor Windschltl then suggested the amendment to Section 6.02 Minimum
Requirements for the R-4 district state: Residential Garage or
Carport over 20 feet wide, from Interior lotline or to save trees, 6
feet. The Mayor emphasized the setback would then be measured from
the foundation, which is what Is normally done.
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Lachinski, an Ordinance amending
Ordinance No. 8, known as the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Andover
as suggested by the Mayor.
VOTE ON MOTION: YES -Knight, Lachinski, Orttel, Windschltl;
PRESENT-Eliing
Motion carried.
uncal then discussed a problem regarding the placement of a house on
the corner lot In Hidden Creek Addition on Hidden Creek Drive and
136th venue NW. The City Engineering Technician drew several
sketche proposing several alternatives for the layout, all of which
require me variances. Because of the uniqueness of this lot, a
35 -foot se ack Is needed on two sides.
Council discus on was the original thought for the 35 -foot sideyard
setback on cocne lots was to align the house on both streets. .Since
there is no house onting on the side street, there is no need for
that great of a setb k.
The Council generally pr erred the layout which was also preferred by
the owner, that being the use facing the west, the garage five feet
from the north lotilne, and slight infringement on the southern
35 -foot setback. A variancew ]d be needed on the southern
curvilinear side.
Rosella Sonstebv - presented a sketch pla of property west of
Roselia's Addition. She explained the mid" ]ot, No. 2, would be an
area that would be utilized by everyone and o ed Jointly. If the
Council does not like that concept, she could m e the other lots
bigger.
Mayor Windschltl noted the most significant problem Idetermining
whether or not the City has the ability to get the sant ry sewer to
service that property. This Is in another sewer dlstrlct, and it
would be an engineering decision as to whether the property ould be
serviced.
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 8NN
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 8, KNOWN AS THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No. 8 is hereby amended as follows:
Section 6.02 Minimum Requirements
R-4
Residential Garage
or Carport from interior
lot line 10
Residential garage or carport
over 20 feet wide, from interior
lotline or to save trees 6
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 16th
day of December 1986.
ATTEST:
fez&
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
�"/ A l
J ry W4bdschitl - Mayor
O
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: Fred Patch, Chief Building Official
SUBJECT: Discussion Regarding 200' Front Yard Setback for Swimming Pools -- City Code, Title 9, Chapter 4
DATE: May 28, 2019
INTRODUCTION
A request for installation of a swimming pool in a front yard caused staff to review front yard setbacks for swimming
pools. City Code, Title 9, Chapter 4 Construction Standards, A. 2 provides a front yard setback as follows:
2. No person, firm or corporation shall build, situate or install a swimmingpool within ten feet (10) of any side or rear
lot line, nor within six feet (6) of any principal structure, nor closer to the front lot line than the principal structure,
except as herein provided On residential parcels of land of one acre or more, a swimming pool maybe constructed closer
to the front lot line than the principal structure, however, the minimum distance it maybe from the frontline shall be
two hundred feet (2009.
The last sentence of that paragraph may be interpreted several ways, with the most restrictive interpretation requiring all
swimming pools to be setback 200` from any front property line. Historically, staff has interpreted the code to require
swimming pools to be installed with the same yard setbacks as any other accessory use or structure:
ZONING
Accessory Structure Yard Setbacks
Front2
Side Fronting on
Side
Rear
DISTRICT
a Public Street
R-17
40
40
5
5
R-2
403
40
5
5
R-3
351
35
5
5
R-4
353
35
5
5
R-5 / PUD Planned
Unit Development
Varies by PUD
Varies by PUD
Varies by PUD
Varies by PUD
NOTES:
City Code 12-6-5 provides accessory building setbacks to accommodate future streets and county roads:
• Where adjacent to a county road, minimum setback to property line is 50' in R-1, R-2, and R-3; and forty (40) feet in R-4.
• Where the county road or arterial street right-of-way is less than 120, assume a 60'right-of-way on each side of the road centerline.
• Where less than the minimum road right-of-way required by City Code 11-3-3 exists, measure setbacks from an assumed full -width right of way.
' On residential parcels 1 acre or more, if the accessory structure is closer to the front lot line than the residence, the front yard setback is 60'.
3 Accessory structures may not occupy more than 25V of a required rear yard.
s For corner lots adjacent to cul-de-sac lots, the side or rear yard setback is the same distance as the principal structure is setback.
s In R-2, R-3 and R-4 District, front yard setback averaging to existing, adjoining buildings shall apply, per City Code 12-5-1.
r Animal Enclosures: Enclosed accessory structures for animals must be maintained at least 100' from a residence; and open animal
enclosures must be maintained at least 50' from a residence.
If the most restrictive interpretation of the code were applied, then staff have long been allowing swimming pools
in violation of the required 200' front yard setback. Given the many acreage parcels in the city of Andover, an
occasional swimming pool located between the public street and the residence may enhance the principle
residential use.
While it is uncommon for swimming pools to be located ahead of the residence, staff would like to discuss
options for amending City Code, Title 9, Chapter 4 to provide better code language and possibly to allow
swimming pools to be located subject to the same yard setbacks as all other uses accessory to residential use.
Y O F
OVE.
34 4V
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Council Members
Jim Dickinson, City
David Berkowitz, Director of Public
Discuss Street Reconstruction - Engineering
May 28, 2019
Engineer
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is requested to discuss roadway pavement conditions throughout the City and provide
direction on how to implement needs and projects in the 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Plan.
DISCUSSION
Attached is a map that will be reviewed and discussed in detail at the meeting that identifies immediate
need for reconstruction or mill and overlay (pink) and also identifies areas of concern that staff feels will
need to be addressed within the next 2 to 3 years (yellow). Also identified on the map are projects that
are currently in the 2019-2023 Capital Improvement Plan (multiple colors).
Jason Baumunk, Streets Supervisor and I will present the information at the meeting and answer
questions.
BUDGETIMPACT
The identified prevalent problem areas are not fully addressed in the 2019-2023 Capital Improvement
Plan and will need to be addressed in the 2020-2024 plan.
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to discuss roadway pavement conditions throughout the City and provide
staff with direction on how to implement needs and projects in the 2020-2024 Capital Improvement
Plan.
Respectfully submitted,
David D. Berkowitz, P.E.
Attachments: Planned and Needed Street Projects Map V/
111�Iliilliilillliliiiii;Illi!�'lill�i!i;iilllil!!�ilillliiiii!liillitiilil�!!3ii�lili�iillii131'illiil!!II!?!
C I T Y O F 1
NDOVE
T11sem` �1 I �i fT
�
-gym
Mill & Lea ve26itcurb�, �-�l-��L` -�_I_�
�r#�+iI_I 1
4A W ! l _ Z, -
J� - -
® �
❑-
I,
'A Mill &Overlay � -
I s
il
Planned and Needed E - m -M� - -� -
I &Overlay
Street Projects
Mill &Overlay
Mill &Overlay
9fiai ft J ---
-- - a I ?
7
Planned Work in CIP
2020 (�.. y ®I v
2021 a s
2022�ti 9,
a �
_.
— 2023 -
Failing/Old r
B 0 s' Mill &Overlay
SealcoatStripping - failure within 2-3 years -
Needs immediate work
t 3 3 3 4 Mill & Overlay _
'�., _ __
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: David Berkowitz, Director of Public rk /City Engineer
SUBJECT: Discuss Potential New Trail Projects - Engineering
DATE: May 28, 2019
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is requested to discuss potential new trail segments that should be considered for the
2020-2024 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).
DISCUSSION
Two new trail segments were identified in the 2019 CIP which include the Andover Station North Trail
(Funded by the Trail Fund and DNR Grant) and Kelsey Round Lake Park Trail (Fund by Park
Dedication and DNR Grant). Both these projects are going to be designed in 2019 for construction in
2020 due to the time of year (late summer/fall) the project would be bid and the current bid climate.
These projects will be moved in the CIP to 2020.
The land acquisition for the Railroad Underpass just east of Winslow Cove 2"d Addition will be
purchased in 2019 for $115,000.
Moving forward into 2021 to 2024 new trail segments need to be prioritized. As directed by the City
Council the Park & Recreation Commission reviewed potential trail segments at their April 18, 2019 and
then finalized at their May 16, 2019 meeting 5 segments for consideration. They are identified in no
particular order on the attached map and as follows:
Segment 1 (identified in the current CIP for 2021)
• North Side of Crosstown Blvd NW from Xeon Street NW to the Railroad Tracks
• North side of Crosstown Blvd NW from Railroad Tracks to 157' Avenue NW
• East side of Crosstown Blvd NW from 157th Avenue NW to 159th Avenue NW (Millers Woods
development)
Segment 2 (Identified by staff based on calls to complete missing gaps)
• Station Parkway from Thrush Street NW to Partridge Circle NW
• Station Parkway from Partridge Circle NW to either Jay Street NW
Segment 3 (identified in the current CIP for 2023)
• West side of Verdin Street NW from 161' Avenue NW to 163`d Lane NW
Segment 4 (possible MNDNR Grant and requested to be identified in the CIP)
• Coon Creek Trail from Prairie Road NW to Butternut Street NW
(This is an approximate 3000' trail that approximately 230' stretch of land would need to be
purchased)
Segment 5 (land will be purchased in 2019 by the City to facilitate possible future improvements)
• Railroad Underpass Trail from the west side (Winslow Cove 2"d Addition) to the east side of the
railroad tracks where there will be the potential of urban development. This is dependent on
development on the east of the railroad tracks.
Mayor and Council Members
May 28, 2019
Page 2 of 2
The 2020-2024 CIP will come back to the City Council for review at a subsequent workshop with more
detail cost and the projected year based on project available funding.
BUDGETIMPACT
Trail segments recommended will be identified in the 2020-2024 CIP and the year and funding source
will be determined based on projected available funds in the Trail Fund and potential grants.
Administration will review and discuss current and past cash flow for the Trail Fund as identified on the
attached 5 Year History Fund Balance and the Projected Fund Balance from the 2019-2023 CIP.
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to discuss potential new trail segments and direct staff on how to proceed
with the 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Plan.
Respectfully submitted,
David D. Berkowitz, P.E.
Attachments: May 16, 2019 Draft Park & Recreation Meeting Minutes, otential New Trail Segment
Map 1/1 Year History Trail Fund Balance'& Trail Fund Projected Fund Balance-"'
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Park & Recreation Commission
CC: David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
FROM: Todd J. Haas, Assistant Public Works Director
SUBJECT: 7. Consider 2020-2024 Trail Capital Improvement Plan
DATE: May 16, 2019
INTRODUCTION
The Park and Recreation Commission is requested to consider the 2020-2024 Trail Capital Improvement
Plan (CIP).
DISCUSSION
The target date for the draft CIP is June 7". Based on the discussion from the last meeting of April 18,
2019, the Park and Recreation Commission discussed a number of potential trail improvements. The
trails segments that were to be considered or brought up for discussion are as follows:
Segment 1 (identified previously by City Council and is currently identified in the CIP)
• Along Crosstown Blvd NW from Xeon Street NW to the Railroad Tracks
• Along Crosstown Blvd NW from Railroad Tracks to 157'h Avenue NW
• Along Crosstown Blvd NW from 1571h Avenue NW tol59th Avenue NW (Millers Woods
development)
Segment 2 (recommended by staff to complete a couple missing gaps to allow residents to have a safer
crossing point where there is either an existing stop sign and/or crosswalk identified)
• Along Station Parkway from Thrush Street NW to Partridge Circle NW
• Along Station Parkway from Partridge Circle NW to either Jay Street NW or Hanson Blvd NW
Segment 3 (identified previously by City Council and is currently identified in the CIP)
• Along Verdin Street NW from 161` Avenue NW to 1631 Lane NW
Segment 4 (a good candidate for a MNDNR Grant and it is recommended by staff for this segment to be
identified in CIP)
• Coon Creek Trail from Prairie Road NW to Butternut Street NW
Segment 5 (land will be purchased by the City to facilitate possible future improvements)
• Railroad Underpass Trail from the west side (Winslow Cove development) to the east side of the
railroad tracks where there will be the potential of urban development. This is dependent on
development on the east of the railroad tracks.
The funding for the trails/sidewalk improvements have been a combination of DNR Grants, general funds
and trail funds that have been received from new developments. Funding of improvements for 2020-2024
have not been identified and will need to be determined by the City Council.
Regular Andover Park & Recreation Commission Meeting
Minutes — May 16, 2019
Page 6
Commissioner Perra asked why Council is interested in the Prairie Knoll Park parking lot
and Mr. Haas stated due to police calls and damage to the current lot. Neighbors
complain cars are parking on the grass. A parking lot attendant is required and the
President of Lacrosse has been reminded.
Chair Lindahl stated he would need to see use numbers before deciding to pave the
parking lot. The north parking lot is not being used.
Mr. Haas stated he will bring back the revised projections for 2019, 2020 and 2021 for
housing units planned. At the June meeting the Commission will need to make their
recommendation.
CONSIDER 2020-2024 TRAIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Mr. Haas stated the Park and Recreation Commission is requested to consider the 2020-
2024 Trail Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The target date for the draft CIP is June 7.
During a discussion at the last meeting on April 18, 2019 the Commission discussed a
number of potential trail improvements. The trail segments that were considered and
discussed are:
Segment 1 (identified previously by City Council and is currently identified in the CIP)
• Along Crosstown Blvd NW from Xeon Street NW to the Railroad Tracks
• Along Crosstown Blvd NW from Railroad Tracks to 157th Avenue NW
• Along Crosstown Blvd NW from 157'h Avenue NW to 1591h Avenue NW (Millers
Woods development)
Segment 2 (recommended by staff to complete a couple missing gaps to allow residents
to have a safer crossing point where there is either an existing stop sign and/or crosswalk
identified)
• Along Station Parkway from Thrush Street NW to Partridge Circle NW
• Along Station Parkway from Partridge Circle NW to either Jay Street NW or
Hanson Blvd NW
Segment 3 (identified previously by City Council and is currently identified in the CIP)
• Along Verdin Street NW from 1615` Avenue NW to 163`d Lane NW
Segment 4 (a good candidate for a MNDNR Grant and it is recommended by staff for this
segment to be identified in CIP)
• Coon Creek Trail from Prairie Road NW to Butternut Street NW
Segment 5 (land will be purchased by the City to facilitate possible future improvements)
• Railroad Underpass Trail from the west side (Winslow Cove development) to the
east side of the railroad tracks where there will be the potential of urban
development. This is dependent on development on the east of the railroad tracks.
Regular Andover Park & Recreation Commission Meeting
Minutes—May 16, 2019
Page 7
Mr. Haas indicated the trail locations on the trail map showing the planned trail
connections.
Commissioner Butler asked if Segment 4 would be continued to the west and Mr. Haas
indicated the plan on the map.
Commissioner Perra asked if a trail needed to be in the CIP before a grant could be
applied for and Chair Lindahl stated there has to be a plan before applying.
The funding for the trails/sidewalk improvements have been a combination of DNR
Grants, general funds and trail funds that have been received from new developments.
Funding of improvements for 2020 — 2024 have not been identified and will need to be
determined by the City Council.
Chair Lindahl asked about Council's discussion about Segment 2. Mr. Haas stated if it is
recommended the Commission needs to specify why that segment is needed.
Commissioner Perra stated she would like to serve the most of the population with the
trails. She is not sure about the Miller's Woods trail as there is not a large neighborhood
that would benefit from that trail.
Chair Lindahl stated the section from Prairie Road to the stop sign is very narrow and is a
50 -mph road.
Commissioner Butler stated although the population is not large there, the safety factor is
a major consideration.
Commissioner Marinello stated the Commission has heard from neighbors in that area as
to the safety.
Motion by Butler, seconded by Perra, to recommend approval of the 2020-2024 Trail
Capital Improvement Plan and adding Segment 4 to the 2020 or 2021 CIP contingent on
receiving the grant funding. Motion carried on a 7 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0 -absent vote.
OUTSTANDINGITEMSIMAINTENANCE UPDATE
Commissioner Butler stated the Task Force has not yet in May. The City Council held a
public meeting and the Council authorized the use of the funding tool. Council will
consider accepting bids at the June 4 Council Meeting,
Mr. Haas reviewed On -Going Projects, Other Items of Interest, and the Weekly Parks
Maintenance Update.
The next Park and Recreation Commission Meeting will be held on June 6, 2019.
FOXME40OWS
r,
40
A
i
I .
J PLEASANTO RK
k r
OUND LAKE
ROUND LAKE BOAT
F `
r
� yyyypop0pDLLgNpCREL�
WETLAND RESTORATION
Id
ROSEPARK rr��
CROOKED LAKE DOAT LANDIPQ��OkeS
OAK
VIEW PARK
A
w r ,
-.. - - - -
138th 3
colds
�
Shady
Bunker Underpass
Knoll
Andover to in the
Park
Neth
av
Park
TERRARK
ae.
p�
a psi
Nn� w� d ��rtrt rrl/
West Parks NEast�arks
and sidewalks.
paved and unpaved surfaces. Paved surface trails are blacktop antl sitlewalks.
CROOKED LAKE
East
Andover SCh005
esi
-.. - - - -
138th 3
Legend
A _
�n�1e
Bunker Underpass
Mill Hidden
Andover to in the
Creekr
Neth
I
Park
TERRARK
`Se
Hi dden 9N
Creek ept2
and sidewalks.
paved and unpaved surfaces. Paved surface trails are blacktop antl sitlewalks.
CROOKED LAKE
East
Andover SCh005
Park
Trail Map
Woodland g
0
A4heskMod
Commons
Park
reexu Is
COON CREEK "
T :'idberVew
Crosg Park
Hkee-La ti
ffs of
Bunks Lake
W stPark
5
7
1 IF
6�$
1
Segment 4
TRAIL UNDERPASS
i
Legend
Bunker Underpass
C I T Y O F
ANDOVE
Andover to in the
Paved Trail
Railroad
This map is provided by the CM g. king people enjoyment
proud trails when walking, running.rolling or bikingTrailsblacktop
Proposed Trail
and sidewalks.
paved and unpaved surfaces. Paved surface trails are blacktop antl sitlewalks.
�
Andover SCh005
pidratimer: rns madam has uaa=omplied satins emrmaaon aamered
Unpaved surface trails are wood chips, soil or sand Not all surrounding trails
Unpaved Trail
hod various ooyemmem sources an0 kto oe urea for reverence
are shown. Trail distances are approximate.
Sidewalk
Water
Wrboses only. Every eflon has been mete to abroad,Ne cgnde eness
and eceura of document, rhe cn fAndowr does not re mated that
dF
Parks
Me data ban used for exaa measurerrent amistance or do-Mmn or
in me features a dionapandes
-Count Trails
Y
prentemn dalaree,roWm era or
are route, Wall (70) 755-5100.
please ,,,�.�.�,...,......�.,. ttw.rz.
i
CITY OF ANDOVER
Trail Fund
Fund Balance - 5 Year History
Estimate
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TOTALS
Projected Sources of Revenue
Trail Fee $ 28 534 $ 39 433 $ 119 858 $ 28 421 $ 23 477 $ 38 414 $ 278 137
Interest
Operating Transfer In
Total Revenues Available
I Projected Commitments I
Misc
13 - 13 Catcher's Creek
16-13 Crosstown Blvd Trail
16-14 Bunker Lake Blvd Tail
15-23 Catchers Creek 2nd
17-16 Andover Blvd Trail
17-17 Crosstown Blvd Trail
17-17 Crosstown Blvd Trail - Boardwalk
Land purchase for underpass
Total Commitments
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance as of December 31, 2013
Fund Balance Brought Forward
Ending Fund Balance
- - - - - 117,550 117,550
3,526 2,124 8,098 6,396 9,302 - 29,446
- 200,000 250,000 250,000 230,000 - 930,000
32,060 241,557 377,956 284,817 262,779 155,964 1,355,133
3,775 - 3,775
29,120 29,120
211,136 211,136
56,125 56,125
85,777 85,777
146,053 146,053
264,735 264,735
430,000 430,000
115,000 115,000
3,775 29,120 267,261 231,830 264,735 545,000 $ 1,341,721
28,285 212,437 110,695 52,987 (1,956) (389,036)
106,678
134,963 347,400 458,095 511,082 509,126
$ 134,963 $ 347,400 $ 458,095 $ 511,082 $ 509,126 $ 120,090
CITY OF ANDOVER
Trail Fund
Projected Fund Balance
*Target - 10% of current years commitments to create a contingency for any project overages.
** It is anticipated that all projects will not be fully expended by the end of the year, and future projects will be contingent on additional revenues.
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
TOTALS
Projected Sources of Revenue
Trail Fee $807 per unit
platted units
25
25
25
25
25
Trail Fee -$845
$ 20,175
$ 21,125
$ 21,125
$ 21,125
$ 21,125
$ 21,125
$ 125,800
Grant
-
117,550
-
-
-
-
117,550
Operating Transfer In
230,000
-
-
-
-
-
230,000
Total Revenues Available
250,175
138,675
21,125
21,125
21,125
21,125
473,350
Projected Commitments
8' Bituminous Trail and Boardwalk along Crosstown Blvd -
680,000
680,000
Bunker Lk Blvd to 140th Ave
10' Bituminous Trail Connection - Andover Station North
215,000
215,000
Railroad Underpass Trail
120,000
300,000
420,000
8' Bituminous Trail along Crosstown Blvd -
Xeon St to railroad tracks
158,000
158,000
Railroad tracks to 157th Ave
287,000
287,000
157th Ave to 159th Ave
236,000
236,000
8' Bituminous Trail along Station Parkway -
Thrush St to Partridge Cir
68,000
68,000
Partridge Cir to Hanson Blvd
170,000
170,000
8' Bituminous Trail along Verdin St -
622,000
622,000
161 st Ave to 163rd Lane
Total Commitments
680,000
215,000
120,000
981,000
238,000
622,000
$ 2,856,000
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(429,825)
(76,325)
(98,875)
(959,875)
(216,875)
(600,875)
Fund Balance as of December 31, 2017
511,082
Fund Balance Brought Forward
81,257
4,932
(93,943)
(1,053,818)
(1,270,693)
Ending Fund Balance *
$ 81,257
$ 4,932
$ (93,943)
$ (1,053,818)
$ (1,270,693)
$ (1,871,568)
*Target - 10% of current years commitments to create a contingency for any project overages.
** It is anticipated that all projects will not be fully expended by the end of the year, and future projects will be contingent on additional revenues.
%�C I T Y 0. F
ND/
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Councilmembers
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
2020 Budget Development Discussion
May 28, 2019
INTRODUCTION
City Administration has starting to focus on the 2020 Annual Operating Budget Development
process and is looking to update the City Council and seek direction as the preparation of the 2020
Annual Operating Budget proceeds.
City Administration will review briefly with the Council the bold italics items at the meeting.
DISCUSSION
The following are the 2020 Budget Development guidelines adopted at the April 2nd City Council
meeting:
1) A commitment to a City Tax Capacity Rate to meet the needs of the organization and
positioning the City for long-term competitiveness using sustainable revenue sources and
operational efficiencies.
Note: Preliminary Anoka County Assessor taxable market value figures for the City of
Andover are reflecting close to a 7.5% increase in total taxable market value.
2) A fiscal goal that works toward establishing the General Fund balance for working capital at
no less than 45% of planned 2020 General Fund expenditures and the preservation of
emergency fund balances (snow emergency, public safety, facility management & information
technology) through targeting revenue enhancements or expenditure limitations in the 2019
adopted General Fund budget.
Note: With property tax revenues making up close to 80% of the total General Fund
revenues cash flow designations approaching 50% are appropriate and recommended by the
City's auditor. The 2019 budget development exceeded this guideline for cash flow, also
Emergency Fund Balances (approximately 3% of planned General Fund expenditures per
finance policy) are in place to stabilize a situation, not be a complete solution. Sta will
review with the Council a anal -audited 2018 General Fund Fund Balance Analysis at the
meeting.
3) A commitment to limit the 2020 debt levy to no more than 25% of the gross tax levy and a
commitment to a detailed city debt analysis to take advantage of alternative financing
consistent with the City's adopted Debt Policy.
Note: The adopted 2019 debt levy was 16.14% of the gross tax levy, the 25% guideline for
2020 provides reasonable margin to accommodate the additional long-term debt either in
place (2018 GO CIP Bonds) or contemplated (2019 GO Abatement Bonds).
Please keep in mind thatfor the 2017& 2018 budgets, $500,000& $525,000 respectively of
existing debt levy through 2016 was temporarily moved to a Capital Levy to fund planned
equipment purchases (rather than issuing debt), that decreased the debt levy percentage of
the gross tax levy significantly.
4) A comprehensive review of the condition of capital equipment to ensure that the most cost-
effective replacement schedule is followed. Equipment will be replaced based on a cost benefit
analysis rather than a year -based replacement schedule.
Note: The City Vehicle Purchasing Committee has been meeting and is performing this
analysis and will make recommendations on equipment needs to the City Council as part of
the 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) development process. This will be covered
in more detail with future CIP discussions.
5) The use of long-term financial models that identify anticipated trends in community growth
and financial resources that will help designate appropriate capital resources for future City
needs. The financial models will be used in the budget planning process to ensure that key
short-term fiscal targets are in line with long-term fiscal projections.
Note: The City continually maintains various financial models to determine the long-term
impacts of present-day expenditures and financing decisions. Fiscal assumptions are based
upon a set of financial data including growth factors, tax capacity valuations, per capita
spending, fund balance reserve, and debt ratios.
6) Continued commitment to strategic planning targeted toward meeting immediate and long-
term operational, staffing, infrastructure and facility needs.
Note: A Council Community Vision and Organizational Goals and Values document is to
be updated by the Council over the next few months. Once complete, Administration will
assure that direction provided in that updated document is integrated into department work
plans and budgets.
7) A management philosophy that actively supports the funding and implementation of Council
policies and goals, and a commitment to being responsive to changing community conditions,
concerns, and demands, and to do so in a cost-effective manner.
Note: Special attention is given to fiscal values, commercial & residential development or
redevelopment, collaboration opportunities, service delivery, livability and image of the
community.
Staffing:
Administration is expecting new staffing requests from various Departments for the 2020
budget. Deadlinefor submission of those requests will be July lsr
There are some anticipated retirements and staff vacancies within the next few years; in response
Administration/Human Resources will continue to focus on succession planning, utilization of
internship opportunities, continued cross -training of staff, and/or possible realignment of
resources.
Personnel Related Implications:
To date the following are the other projected issues facing personnel related expenses:
1. Human Resources will review all position -based salaries and the associated benefit
package to determine if the total package is competitive with other government entities.
Based on the research in late 2019, there are a few positions where salaries are lagging the
market. The 2019 budget is carrying budget dollars to address those positions in 2019.
Pay steps for eligible employees will be included in a 2020 budget proposal A cost of
living adiustment (COLA) for non -bargaining employees will be evaluated.
The current Public Works Union contract expires December 31, 2019, negotiations on
the next Public Works Union contract started on May Is', once negotiations are complete
the impacted department budgets will be updated accordingly.
2. A midyear review ofthe employee health plan for the 2020 Budget will be conducted with
our broker in late June or early July.
During the 2019 Budget development process, unfortunately, the best and only rate came
from our current provider HealthPartners with a 29% rate increase to maintain the current
plan. Most insurance companies and consortium groups were not competitive or just
elected not to bid based on the group's claim experience at that time.
Administration/Human Resources last year did continue to work with our broker to solicit
other options from HealthPartners and was able to secure a proposal on an additional option
similar to the current plan except with a higher deductible but limiting the plan to a 17%
rate increase.
Human Resources at that time held discussions with members of the City's Employee
Benefit Committee and the result of those discussion were a recommendation to the City
Council that the City offer the employees the choice of two open access high deductible
plans, one with a $5,000 family plan deductible and $2,500 single plan deductible (the
current plan model), the other with a $7,000 family plan deductible and $3,500 single plan
deductible (new offering). That recommendation also included that as part of the employee
benefit program, the City will continue to pay 100% of the lower cost single health
insurance premium and 76% of the lower cost family health insurance premium.
The plans offered are accompanied with a health spending account (HSA), that was
originally implemented in 2006. The City does contribute annually to an employee's HSA
to assist with the high deductible out of pocket costs. That contribution is evaluated
annually as part of the marketing of the health insurance plans.
Contractual Departments:
1. The City Attorney 2019 contract reflected a 2% increase over the 2018 contract. There
have been limited discussions to date for 2020.
2. The 2019 City of Andover Law Enforcement expenditure budget is $3,183,610 which is
offset by a Police State Aid revenue budget of $135,200 and School Liaison revenue budget
of $99,350 reflecting a net tax levy impact of $2,949,060.
The 2019 Sheriff's contract provides for:
a. 80 hours per day of patrol service
b. 6 hours per day of service provided by a Community Service Officer
c. School Liaison Officers in the middle school and high school
d. 2 Patrol Investigators
e. 50% of the Crime Watch Program's coordinator position.
Per contract, the Sheriff always provides the required number of deputies for all hours
contracted by the City. If the Sheriff s Office has a deputy vacancy or a deputy is injured
etc., they still provide the City with a deputy at straight time even though they may have to
fill those hours with overtime which at times may cost the Sheriffs Department additional
but is not billable per the contract.
Staff has had initial discussions with the Anoka County, Sheriff for a 2020 status quo
contract, and the Anoka County Sheriff's Office will be scheduled to be before the City
Council likely at the June workshop meeting.
Council Memberships and Donations/Contributions:
The following memberships/contributions are currently included in the 2019 Budget:
• North Metro Mayors Association
$15,150
(GF)
• Metro Cities
$ 9,518
(GF)
• Mediation Services
$ 3,366
(GF)
• YMCA — Water Safety Program
$ 8,500
(GF)
• Alexandra House
$18,328
($15,328 GF & $3,000 CG)
■ Youth First (Program Funding)
$14,000
($12,000 GF & $2,000 CG)
■ NW Anoka Co. Community Consortium - JPA
$10,000
(GF)
• Teen Center Funding (YMCA)
$24,500
($8,100 GF & $16,400 CG)
• Family of Promise
$ 3,000
(CG)
• Lee Carlson Central Center for Family Resources
$ 1,500
(GF)
• Senior High Parties
■ Stepping Stone
• Hope for Youth
1,000 (CG)
900 (CG)
1,000 (CG)
Some are funded via the General Fund (GF), and those that qualify for charitable gambling
funding are done through the Charitable Gambling (CG) Special Revenue Fund.
Council direction will be sought on the memberships/contributions for 2020.
Capital Projects Levy:
Capital Projects Levy—The 2019 Capital Projects Levy Budget specifically designates $2,001,788
of the general tax levy to capital projects and equipment needs relating to Capital Project Outlay
($275,000), Road and Bridge ($1,254,788), Pedestrian Trail Maintenance ($102,000), Park
Projects ($15,000) and Facility Maintenance Reserve ($355,000). Specific designation of the tax
levy to anticipated City needs and priorities for transportation and trail maintenance, park projects
and equipment outlays allows the City to strategically allocate its resources and raise the public's
awareness of City spending priorities. The Road and Bridge levy is evaluated annually and along
with Capital Outlay, Pedestrian Trail Maintenance, Parks Projects and Facility Maintenance levies
increased/decreased according to the City Council budget guidelines.
• Road and Bridge
An adjustment was made to the Road & Bridge funding formula in 2014, primarily to stop
the continual decrease in the levy that has been happening over the past few years due to
decreases in the Anoka County Assessor taxable market value figures for the City of
Andover. Based on Council discussion, consensus was to stop the decline in road funding
and evaluate annually through the adopted City Council Budget Development Guidelines.
It should be noted that in 2014, Local Government Aid (LGA) in the amount of $74,655
was used to help fund the Road & Bridge Fund. That State of Minnesota funding has largely
gone away, down to $0.00 in 2017 and 2018. Future increases in LGA or even the presence
of LGA for the City of Andover based on the current State formula are remote.
The 2018 City of Andover Road & Bridge levy was $1,169,014. That was a 4.74%
increase over 2017. The 2019 budget contained a 7.34% increase ($85,774) to
$1,254,788 for the 2019 budget.
Administration will likely be proposing an increase again for 2020.
• Pedestrian Trail Maintenance
The 2018 City of Andover Pedestrian Trail Maintenance levy was increased significantly
from $63,075 in 2017 to $100,000 for 2018, a 58.54% increase in funding. The 2019
budget included a 2% increase ($2,000) to $102,000.
Administration will likely be proposing an increase again for 2020.
• Park Improvements
This levy is an annual appropriation to be used to underwrite park improvement projects
as recommended by the Park and Recreation Commission and approved by the City
Council. This funding is intended to be a supplemental source of capital funding for park
projects that is separately identified in the City's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan.
The 2015 levy was $61,500, but only $15,000 was leviedfor 2016. $46,500oftheprevious
levy was re -assigned to the General Fund to focus on Park's maintenance/replacement
items. In addition to the re -assigned funds an additional $43,500 of General Fund levy
was assigned to Parks Repair/Replacement itemsfor a total levy of $90,000 in 2016, and
that continued for 2017. The 2018 General Fund levy assigned to Parks
Repair/Replacement items levy was increased to $100,000 and continued at that level for
2019, the Parks Project levy continues to remain at $15,000.
Administration/Finance will evaluate these levy items throughout the CIP process to
determine if there will be any adjustment to these levies for the 2020 budget
• Equipment/Projects
Under the Capital Projects Levy, a levy is proposed to be designated to Capital
Equipment/Project expenditures identified through the CIP process. Through this
designation, the City, over time, will build a fund reserve to avoid cash flow "spikes" and
address a wide range of capital improvement needs such as facility maintenance projects
under a more controlled spending environment. The 2018 levy was $275,000, the 2019
budget was also set at $275,000.
Administration will likely be recommending the same $275,000 for 2020
• Capital Equipment/Projects
This was a reassigned levy in 2017 to provide for the 2017 equipment purchases.
Administration/Finance proposed a straight $500,000 Capital Equipment Purchases
Levy for the 2017 equipment purchases rather than through debt service levy and an
equipment bond This process continued through 2018 but increased the levy by $25,000
to $525,000. In 2019, this levy is turned back to debt service levy for the City Campus
Master Plan implementation.
Administration will not be recommending a Capital Equipment/Project levy for 2020•
equipment purchases for 2020 will be proposed to be through the debt service levy and
an equipment bond
• Facility Maintenance
This was anew $50,000 levy proposed for 2018. A facility condition assessment study
identifzed many maintenance repairs for City facilities such as roof repairs, HVAC,
electrical panels, fire alarm systems, windows and air quality related items. This levy
was increased to $355,000 for the 2019 budget to help address significant deferred
maintenance items that have been identified for buildings (Public Works & Community
Center) being evaluated as potential expansion projects within the City Campus Master
Plan. Going forward, this levy could stay as a straight Capital Improvement Levy or
could be converted to a Debt Service Levy based on market conditions at the time of the
project.
Administration/Finance will be evaluating this levv throughout the CIP process but does
not anticipate there will be any adjustment recommended for 2020
Debt Service Levy:
Annually the Finance Department conducts a detailed debt service analysis to monitor outstanding
debt and to look for early debt retirement or refinancing opportunities that will yield interest
expense savings to the City. (Staffalong with Ehlers & Associates will complete reviews to see if
any refinancing opportunities are available at this time, we will then continue to monitor refunding
opportunities, as markets can move quickly, and calculate potential savings for each issue that
may meet parameters which may generate savings.)
The current 2019 Debt Service levy is as follows:
• 2010A G.O. Open Space Referendum
• 2012C Taxable G.O. Abatement Bonds
• 2014A G.O. Equipment Certificates
• 2016A G.O. Equipment Certificates
• 2018A Capital Improvement Plan Bonds
Total
183,989 (The last year is 2021)
969,378 (The last year is 2031)
294,525 (The last year is 2019)
142,837 (The last year is 2020)
525,000 (The last year is 2043)
$2,115,729
Staff will review with the Council at the meeting but note that the 2019 Debt Service levy reflects
the reassignment of the $525,000 Capital Projects Levy back to Debt Service Levy for the City
Campus Master Plan implementation.
For the 2020 Debt Service Levy, Administration willlikely be recommend replacing the expiring
2014A G.O. Equipment Certificates Bond with a 2020 G.O. Equipment Certificates Bond also
the 2020 Debt Service Levy will contain a 2019 G.0 Abatement Bond debt service levy if the
Community Center Expansion Proiect is approved to move forward to construction
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is requested to receive a presentation and provide direction to staff.
ctfully submitted,
Dickinson
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: April 2019 General Fund Budget Progress Report
DATE: May 28, 2019
INTRODUCTION
The City of Andover 2019 General Fund Budget contains total revenues of $11,378,046 and total
expenditures of $11,740,993; a decrease in fund balance is planned.
Monthly reporting of the City Budget progress to the Governing body is a recommended financial
practice and often viewed positively by rating agencies.
DISCUSSION
Attached is the General Fund Revenue & Expenditure Budget Summary - Budget Year 2019
reflecting year to date actual through April 2019. The attachments are provided to assist
discussion reviewing 2019 progress; other documents may be distributed at the meeting
The following represents Administration's directives and departmental expectations for 2019:
1. Expenditure budgets while approved, expenses are to meet with the spirit that needs are
fulfilled first, expansions of service and special requests are to be reviewed with City
Administration before proceeding.
2. Departments are to be committed to search for the best possible prices when purchasing goods
and services.
3. Departments are to be committed to continually searching out new efficiencies and to
challenge the status quo of how the City provides services.
4. Departments are to be committed to searching out collaborative opportunities to facilitate
efficient and cost-effective utilization of governmental assets and personnel.
5. Departments are to be committed to developing effective, consistent and ongoing
communications with City residents, businesses and other stakeholders.
6. Departments are to be cognizant that services provided are subject to available revenues and
should not commit to services that are not sustainable.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is requested to receive a presentation from staff.
Nspelly submitted,
CITY OF ANDOVER
General Fund Budget Summary Totals
Budget Year 2019
2018 1 2019
REVENUES Budget Apr YTD %Bud Final Budget Apr YTD %Bud
General Property Tax
$ 8,721,256
$ 7,707
0%
$ 8,634,130
$ 9,023,970
$ -
0%
Licenses and Permits
377,900
111,736
30%
562,525
384,900
198,578
52%
Intergovernmental
766,274
204,013
27%
829,860
787,918
202,094
26%
Charges for Services
746,700
222,653
30%
888,947
708,700
267,331
38%
Fines
90,250
19,282
21%
73,719
75,250
17,507
23%
Investment Income
75,000
(6,871)
-9%
107,560
75,000
(3,293)
-4%
Miscellaneous
129,300
67,039
52%
176,662
134,300
69,178
52%
Transfers In
178,558
178,558
100%
178,558
188,008
188,008
100%
Total Revenues
$ 11,085,238
$ 804,117
7%
S 11,451,961
$ 11,378,046
S 9399403
8%
Total Expenditures
$
2018
$
3,135,400
28% S
2019
S
EXPENDITURES
Budget
Apr YTD
%Bud
Final
Budget
Apr YTD
%Bud
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
Mayor and Council
$ 91,298
$ 46,030
50%
S 87,813
$ 107,751
$ 50,644
47%
Administration
203,833
64,437
32%
198,945
215,952
67,973
31%
Newsletter
26,000
5,406
21%
17,770
26,800
9,574
36%
Human Resources
28,431
9,042
32%
13,666
28,771
10,180
35%
Attorney
191,360
47,084
25%
188,031
197,041
47,946
24%
City Clerk
155,608
51,742
33%
149,770
163,651
54,564
33%
Elections
59,781
10,956
18%
50,629
65,640
4,001
6%
Finance
278,660
95,795
34%
272,851
290,752
103,157
35%
Assessing
154,000
-
0%
149,040
154,000
-
0%
Information Services
180,597
52,271
29%
171,637
187,743
52,578
28%
Planning & Zoning
438,827
131,624
30%
422,984
456,887
130,138
28%
Engineering
553,765
171,179
31%
527,688
575,968
181,443
32%
Facility Management
678,519
141,389
21%
497,641
695,944
183,691
26%
Total General Gov
3,040,679
826,955
27%
2,748,465
3,166,900
895,889
28%
PUBLIC SAFETY
Police Protection
3,053,526
763,381
25%
3,053,526
3,183,610
795,903
25%
Fire Protection
1,423,914
382,558
27%
1,445,167
1,471,101
390,357
27%
Protective Inspection
462,164
135,949
29%
436,789
479,543
144,663
30%
Civil Defense
32,502
6,657
20%
18,060
29,184
7,832
27%
Animal Control
5,950
150
3%
2,809
5,950
598
10%
Total Public Safety
4,978,056
1,288,695
26%
4,956,351
59169,388
19339,353
26%
PUBLIC WORKS
Streets and Highways
659,943
185,222
28%
656,194
696,225
154,059
22%
Snow, and Ice Removal
562,706
366,507
65%
599,028
586,375
417,013
71%
Street Signs
219,418
60,196
27%
206,890
227,527
49,458
22%
Traffic Signals
37,000
5,444
15%
33,857
39,500
5,451
14%
Street Lighting
40,400
8,213
20%
32,829
40,400
8,129
20%
Street Lights - Billed
220,500
35,516
16%
142,937
180,500
35,886
20%
Park & Recreation
1,318,395
304,550
23%
1,282,415
1,352,017
317,792
24%
Natural Resource Preservation
15,074
503
0%
5,158
18,107
2,569
14%
Recycling
157,216
43,484
31%
199,182
168,626
64,336
38%
Total Public Works
3,230,652
1,009,635
31%
3,158,490
3,309,277
1,054,693
32%
OTHER
Miscellaneous
31,828
1,615
5%
233,440
56,828
1,565
3%
Youth Services
38,600
8,500
22%
8,500
38,600
8,500
22%
Total Otber
70,428
10,115
14%
241,940
95,428
10,065
11%
Total Expenditures
$
11,319,815
$
3,135,400
28% S
11,105,246
S
11,740,993
5
3,300,000 28%
NET INCREASE (DECREASE)
S
(234,577)
S
(2,331,283)
S
346,715
S
(362,947)
S
(2,360,597)
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: April 2019 City Investment Reports
DATE: May 28, 2019
INTRODUCTION
64
Summary reporting of the City Investment portfolio to the Governing body is a recommended
financial practice and often viewed positively by rating agencies.
Furthermore, the City of Andover Investment Policy recommends the Finance Director presents
to the City Council at least quarterly the type of investments held by the City.
DISCUSSION
Attached is the Investment Maturities Summary for April 2019, the April 2019 Investment
Detail Report, and the April 2019 Money Market Funds Report. These attachments are
intended to provide a status report on the April 2019 investments.
ACTION REQUESTED
for Council review. Staff will provide a brief presentation and answer questions.
submitted,
Investment Maturities - April 2019
Deposits
Total cash and investments
Credit
_ Investment Type
Rating
Fair
Less Than
Money market funds
N/A
MN Municipal Money
Value
Market Fund (4M)
N/A
Certificates of deposit
FDIC
Local governments
A/Al/A2
$
AA/AAI/AA2/AA3
$
AAA
State governments
A/Al/A2
-
AA/AAI/AA2/AA3
13,179,684
AAA
U.S. agencies
AAA
U.S. agencies
N/A
Total investments
60,037
Deposits
Total cash and investments
$ 49,326,656 $ 30,404,977 $ 16,067,517 $ 2,426,163 $ 427,999
754,227
$ 50,080,884
Investment Maturities (in Years)
Fair
Less Than
More Than
Value
1
1-5
6-10
10
$ 2,477,936
$ 2,477,936
$
$
$
10,755,088
10,755,088
-
-
-
13,179,684
9,483,081
3,696,603
-
-
325,213
164,497
60,037
100,680
-
5,364,503
1,501,156
2,339,443
1,423,904
100,000
5,272,881
1,796,116
2,404,644
744,121
327,999
203,516
-
203,516
-
-
930,644
85,000
845,644
467,362
-
467,362
-
10,349,829
4,142,103
6,050,268
157,458
$ 49,326,656 $ 30,404,977 $ 16,067,517 $ 2,426,163 $ 427,999
754,227
$ 50,080,884
April 2019 Investment Detail
Description
Cusip
Number
Credit
Rating/F
DIC #
Type
Purchase Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
Date
Acquired
Coupon
Date
Maturity/
Due Date
Customers Bank
23204HFAl
34444
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.000%
244,960.80
semi-annual
02/21/18
08/21/18
05/21/19
Banner Bank
06652XFP5
28489
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
1.850%
244,943.65
semi-annual
02/23/18
08/23/18
05/23/19
First Foundation Bk
32026UFSO
58647
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.000%
244,948.55
semi-annual
02/28118
08/28/18
05/28119
Ally Bank Midvale Utah
02006LF32
57803
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
1.200%
244,527.15
semi-annual
06/30/16
12/30/16
07/01119
Barclays Bank
06740KHB6
57203
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
1 2.050%11111111
246,861.68
semi-annual
07/03/10
01/02/15
07/02/19
Synchrony Bank
87164WBT4
27314
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.050%
246,829.57
semi-annual
07/11/14
01/11/15
07/11/19
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
48125Y51-4
628
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
1.100%
244,387.50
quarterly
07/15/16
10/15/16
07/15/19
Farmers & Merchants Banc
308IONBGO
1895
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.300%
244,973.05
semi-annual
07/17/18
01/17/19
07/17/19
BankUnited A Savings
066519FX2
58979
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.300%
244,958.35
maturity
07/18118
none
07118/19
MountainOneBank
62452ACG3
90253
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.250%
244,931.40
maturity
07/18/18
none
07/18/19
PrivateBank & Trust Co
74267GUQ8
33306
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.000%
246,797.46
semi-annual
07/21/14
01/21/15
07/22119
Goldman Sachs Bank USA
38147JU59
33124
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.050%
246,765.35
semi-annual
07/23/14
01/23/15
07/23/19
Sallie Mae Bank
795450895
58177
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
1.700%
244,544.30
semi-annual
08/09/17
02/09/18
08/09/19
Town Bank
892094CK7
34717
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.300%
244,931.40
maturity
08/30118
none
08/09119
First Federal Svgs Bk
32021YCH4
29690
CD
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
1.500%
248,731.08
monthly
01/21/16
02/21/16
08/21/19
Santander Bank NA
80280JRQ6
29950
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.300%
244,911.80
maturity
09/05/18
none
09/05/19
Valley NIB
919853BB6
9396
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.350%
244,953.45
maturity
09/06118
none
09/06119
Victory Bank
92644LAB8
58615
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.000%
246,612.21
semi-annual
09/24/14
03/24/15
09/24/19
BMO Harris Bk Nat] Assoc
05581WA70
16571
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.450%
245,075.95
semi-annual
08/31/18
09/01/18
10/01/19
CommerceWest Bank NIA
20084TKX0
57176
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.300%
2.350%
244,899.55
semi-annual
04/25/18
04/27/18
10/25/18
10/27/18
10/25/19
10/28/19
Umpqua Bk Roseburg Ore
90421MBZ5
17266
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
244,958.35
semi-annual
_
Third Federal Sav&Loan
88413QAWB
1091003210
30012
21714
CD
CD
128,000.00
245,000.00
128,000.00
245,000.00
128,000.00
245,000.00
2.000%
2.500%
127,778.56
245,000.00
semi-annual
11/24/14
05/24/15
11/25/19
1 Year CD- Premier Bank
maturity
12/16/18
none
12/16/19
1 Year CD- Premier Bank Rochester
2055214401
33202
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.500%
245,000.00
maturity
12/16/18
none
12/16/19
1 Year CD - Premier Bank MN
3041574901
33204
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.500%
245,000.00
maturity
12116/18
none
12/16/19
1 Year CD - Premier Bank
1091003211
CD
275,000.00
275,000.00
275,000.00
2.500%
275,000.00
maturity
12/17/18
none
12/17/19
Celtic Bank
15118RJM0
57056
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.050%
246,733.24
semi-annual
12/20/13
06120/14
12/20/19
Steams Bank NA
857894PB9
10988
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
1.000%
246,498.59
semi-annual
12/26/14
06/26/15
12/26/19
Compass Bk
20451PVJ2
19048
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.650%
245,401.80
semi-annual
10/11/18
04/11/19
01/13/20
Kearny Bank
48714LAS8
28765
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.750%
245,575.75
semi-annual
12/21/18
06/21119
01/21/20
Exchange Bank
301074DA5
1435
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.350%
244,862.80
maturity
04/26/19
none
01/27/20
Fifth Third Bank
316777WS6
6672
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.500%
245,115.15
maturity
03/13/19
none
03/13/20
MizuhoBank USA
60688MYG3
21843
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.500%
245,115.15
maturity
03/13/19
none
03/13/20
US Bank NA
90333VL32
6548
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.450%
245,009.80
maturity
03/13/19
none
03/13/20
Jefferson Bk & Tr Co
472376AD4
1071
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.450%
245,009.80
semi-annual
04/11/18
10/11/18
04/10/20
CitiBank NA
17312QJ34
7213
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.550%
245,240.10
semi-annual
04/11/18
10/11/18
04/13/20
Discover Bk Greenwood Del
254673NR3
5649
CD
245,000.00
2.500%
245,124.95
semi-annual
04/11/18
10/11/18
04/13/20
Iberia Bank
45083AJL7
28100
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.6009%
245,355.25
semi-annual
07/12/18
01/11/19
04/13/20
Bankwell Bank
06654BBA8
57368
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.350%
244,757.45
maturity
04/30/19
none
04/29/20
Elbow Lake MN
284281 KC5
A
local
170,045.70
170,045.70
165,000.00
2.750%
164,496.75
semi-annual
12/08/14
none
12/01/19
Cedar Rapids IA
150528RMI
AA1
local
217,672.00
217,672.00
200,000.00
3.000%1
200,064.00
semi-annual
06/11/13
12/01/13
06/01/19
9,483,080.99 CD
Description
umbCuso
Number
Credit
Rating/F
DIC #
Type
Purchase Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
Interest Paid
Date
Acquired
Coupon
Date
Maturity)
Due Date
Multnomah Cnty OR Sch Dist 1J J _
Minneapolis MN _ _
Hampton VA
Sioux City lA _
Waterloo IA
Western Lake Superior MN
Portsmouth VA _
Moorhead MN
6_25517JMO
60374YS81
AA1
AA1
AA1
AA2 _
AA2
local
local
local
local
250,000.00
278,632.50
250,000.00
250,000.00
1.450%
3.500%
2.209%
2.000%
2.000%
3.150%
249,682.50
semi-annual
semi-annual
08/10/17
02126/13
12115/17
none
06/15/19
278,632.50
100,836.00
156,100.50
50,559.50
250,000.00
100,000.00
251,252.50
99,624.00
12/01/19
4095582J1
829458FC7
100,836.00
semi-annual
semi-annual
01120116
none
04/01/20
156,100.50
155,000.00
154,900.80
12/22116
none
06/01/19
941647PAl
local
50,559.50
50,000.00
49,974.00
semi-annual
06/27113
08/16/11
12/01/13
06/01119
958522WU4
AA2
_AA2
AA3
local
100,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
100,218.00
semi-annual
04/01/12
10/01119
73723RSLB
local
local
286,268.00
286,268.00
295,000.00
2.400%
294,648.95
semi-annual
07/17/13
02/01/14
02/01/20
_
6161412R7
108,820.00
108,820.00
100,000.00
3.800%
100,791.00
semi-annual
11/14/11
none
02/01/20
_
Palm Beach Cnty FLA
696497TR7
AAA
local
87,444.75
87,444.75
75,000.00
5.898%
75,116.25
semi-annual
07/06/11
none
06/01/19
Tenn Val Auth Cpn Strip Zero Cpn
Norwalk Conn
Greensboro NC _
Mounds View MN ISO #621
Rothsay MN ISD #850_
Saint Paul MN Port Auth
Woodbury MN _
Dallas TX lndpl Sch Dist _
Saint Paul MN Pod Auth
Colorado Sl Hag & Fin Auth _
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Med Term Note
Fed Home Ln Bank
Fed Farm Credit Bank _
Fed Home Ln Bank
Fed Home Ln Bank
88059EWZ3
_ AAA _
AAA
AAA_
AAA
AAA
AAA
AAA
local
262,890.00
262,890.00
122,464.80
366,832.80
246,875.00
208,640.25
201,806.00
123,037.35
300,000.00
120,000.00
299,088.00
maturity
12127/13
none
06/15/19
668844DS9
_
local
local
122,464.80
4.050%
120,138.00
semi-annual
08/04/10
08/01/11
08/01/19
39546OV21
620637V70
366,832.80
360,000.00
3.263%
1.900%
3.000%
2.000%
3.250%
4.450%
2.000%
360,979.20
248,692.50
197,119.65
198,866.00
115,274.85
semi-annual
07/15111
none
10/01/19
local
local
246,875.00
250,000.00
semi-annual
05/16118
none
02/01/20
778731AZ2
208,640.25
195,000.00
200,000.00
115,000.00
semi-annual
07/06/16
12/22/16
12/22/11
none
08/01/17
none
02/01/20
793028WS6
local
201,806.00
123,037.35
semi-annual
02101120
97913PC07
local
semi-annual
02/01/20
235308QK2
AAA
local
116,900.00
116,900.00
79,756.80
84,864.00
249,035.00
200,000.00
301,065.00
297,300.00
248,227.50
100,000.00
101,394.00
semi-annual
04/16/12
01/10/17
01/26118
07/07117
08/23/16
12/07117
08/15111
02/15/20
793067CC1
AAA
local
79,756.80
80,000.00
79,448.00
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
quarterly
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
maturity
semi-annual
09/01117
03/01120
196479A82
AA2
AAA
AAA
AAA
_ AAA
_ AAA
AAA
AAA
AAA
AAA _
AAA
AAA
AAA _
AAA
AAA
state
US
US
US
US
US
84,864.00
85,000.00
250,000.00
1.875%
1.250%
1.050%
2.000%
1.160%
1.550%
1.125%
1.350%
1.300%
85,000.00
249,240.00
199,098.00
299,499.00
298,518.00
248,982.50
298,155.00
none
02/01/13
11/23/16
none
none
05/01/19
08101/19
08123/19
09113119
09126119
10111119
10/11/19
3137EADK2
249,035.00
3134G96U6
313383VN8
200,000.00
301,065.00
297,300.00
248,227.50
294,603.00
200,000.00
300,000.00
3133EGVJ1
300,000.00
250,000.00
300,000.00
12/08/17
3130ACLS1
01/04/18
04/10/18
07/22/15
02109/18
04/11/18
10/11/16
313OA8NRO
76116FAA5
US
294,603.00
185,568.00
_ 9_8,570.00
199,600.00
RFCSP Strip Principal Zero Coupon
US
US
185,568.00
200,000.00
100,000.00
197,834.00
99,463.00
none
10/28/16
10/15/19
10/28/19
Fed Natl Mtg Assn _ _ _
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3135GOJ95
3133EGBKO
98,570.00
199,600.00
US
200,000.00
198,812.00
semi-annual
maturity
semi-annual
semi-annual _
semi-annual
05125116
11/02/15
11/03/17
03/23/18
11/25/16
11/25119
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Zero Cpn
Fed Farm Credit Bank
31340OBV4
US
950,527.00
950,527.00
1,000,000.00
1.330%
1.450%
1.500%
985,440.00
223,566.75
none
11/29/19
3133EGFR1
313381ND3
3137EAEE5
US
223,031.25
223,031.25
225,000.00
none
12/16/19
_
Fed Home Ln Bank
US
147,300.00
147,300.00
297,912.00
99,500.00
294,390.00
150,000.00
149,028.00
none
01/09/20
_
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp
US
297,912.00
300,000.00
298,107.00
12/07/17
07/17117
01/17/20
Fed Home Ln Bank
313OA3XL3
US
99,500.00
100,000.00
1.500%
99,282.00
semi-annual
07/22/15
08/10115
02/10/20
Fed Home Ln Mfg Corp Mod Term Note
3134G9ML8
AAA
US
294,390.00
300,000.00
1.300%1
297,078.00
semi-annual
12110/18
none
03116/20
17,171,953.19
Bank of America, NA
06051 VD37
3510
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.850%
246,065.75
semi-annual
12/12/18
06112/19
06/12/20
Citizens Alliance Bank
17318LAP9
1402
CD
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
2.000%
248,422.32
monthly
08127/14
07/27/14
06126/20
Morgan Stanley Bank NA
61747M3Q2
32992
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.750%
245,850.15
semi-annual
07/12/18
01112/19
07/13/20
Morgan Stanley Private Bank _
MUFG Union Bank NA
61760AMT3
34221_
22826
CD
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.750%
2.600%
245,855.05
245,421.40
semi-annual
semi-annual
07/12/18
07/17/18
07/14/18
01117/19
07113/20
07/17/20_
624786CY3
245,000.00
Enerbank USA
29266NA31
57293
CD
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
2.100%
247,939.26
monthly
07/18/14
08/18114
07/20/20
3,461,768.95 local
85,000.00 state
4,142,103.2S US
Less Than 1 Year
Description
umbCuso
Number
Credit
Rating/F
DIC #
Type
Purchase Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
Interest Paid
Date
Acquired
Coupon
Date
Maturity)
Due Date
NBT Bank Norwich _
628779FT2
7230
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.700%
245,717.85
semi-annual
07118/18
01118/19
07/20/20
_
First Republic Bank
336161381-3
59017
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.800%
246,100.05
semi-annual
08/31/18
09/01/18
08/28/20
_
Merchants Stale Bank
589227AF4
1125
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.650%
245,776.65
semi-annual
08/31/18
02/28/19
08/28/20
Wax Bk
92937CHY7
34697
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
3.000%
246,888.95
semi-annual
10/10/18
04/10/19
10/13120
TIAA FSB Jacksonville FL
872701-6X0
34775
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.400%
244,789.30
semi-annual
04/17/19
10/17/19
10/19/20
Cit Bank Nall Assn
12556LAT3
58978
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
3.000%
247,089.85
semi-annual
12/17/18
06/17/19
12/17/20
Synovus Bank
87164DMW7
873
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.400%
244,674.15
semi-annual
04117119
10/17/19
04116121
First Source Bank
33646CKP8
9087
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
3.150%
248,618.65
semi-annual
12/17/18
06/17/19
11/17/21
Raymond James Bk
75472RAA9
33893
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.950%
247,393.65
semi-annual
01/25119
07/25/19
01/25/22
Kaufman TX
486206KR5
A3
local
61,821.00
61,821.00
60,000.00
3.000%
60,036.60
semi-annual
06128/16
02/15/17
02/15123
Dunn County WI
265777HD7
AA
local
115,752.10
115,752.10
115,000.00
3.000%
115,886.65
semi-annual
04/04/19
none
10101/20
Chaska MN
1616636S3
AA
local
83,725.60
83,725.60
80,000.00
4.000%1
80,898.40
semi-annual
09/08/14
none
02/01/24
Steams Cc MN
857896MH4
AA+
local
276,875.00
276,875.00
250,000.00
4.500%
3.750%
250,422.50
semi-annual
04/17/13
none
06/01/20
Middleton WI
596782RX2
AA1
local
106,979.00
106,979.00
100,000.00
100,119.00
semi-annual
02/24/15
none
09/01/20
Bristol VA
110331NT8
AA1
local
251,562.50
251,562.50
250,000.00
3.002%
252,002.50
semi-annual
07/05/18
none
10/01/20
Des Moines IA Area Cmnty 1301
250097H21
AAI
local
50,606.00
110,419.00
50,606.00
110,419.00
50,000.00
2.450%
49,792.50
semi-annual
11/10/14
12/01/14
none
06/01/21
Minneapolis MN
60374YG68
AA1
local
100,000.00
4.700%
100,203.00
semi-annual
10/31/11
03/01/23
Brunswick Cnty
117061VHI
_ AA2_
local
108,967.10
108,967.10
110,000.00
1.740%
108,647.00
semi-annual
08/21115
none
05/01/20
Fon Du Lac Cnty WI
344442KK3
AA2
local
259,715.00
259,715.00
250,000.00
3.250%
251,302.50
semi-annual
03110117
none
03101121
Adams & Arapahoe Cntys CO
005482W83
AA2
local
117,817.50
117,817.50
115,000.00
3.930%
117,140.15
semi-annual
07/12118
none
12/01121
Alexandria MN ISD#206
015131LQ6
AA2
local
local
279,760.50
235,428.00
279,760.50
270,000.00
240,000.00
3.000%
273,040.20
semi-annual
01/21/15
none
02/01/23
Bangor ME
0600954R4
AA2
235,428.00
2.850%
241,814.40
semi-annual
11/21/18
none
11/01/23
Whitewater Wls
966204KA6
AA3
local
109,541.00
109,541.00
100,000.00
4.850%
103,577.00
semi-annual
06/09/11
none
12/01/20
Georgetown MA
372838KG6
AA3
local
98,922.00
98,922.00
100,000.00
2.500%
99,229.00
semi-annual
02/20119
12/15/20
12/15/21
West Bend WI
9514288NO
AA3
local
97,805.00
97,805.00
100,000.00
1.900%
98,210.00
semi-annual
01/11118
none
04/01/22
W Palm Beach FL
955116BE7
AA3
local
101,245.00
101,245.00
100,000.00
2.264%
97,158.00
semi-annual
07/05/16
10/01/16
10/01/22
Tenn Valley Auth Zero Cpn
88059EHD9
AAA
local
263,970.00
263,970.00
300,000.00
292,524.00
maturity
03/11113
none
05/01/20
Salt Lake County UT
795676QL2
AAA
local
368,212.50
368,212.50
375,000.00
1.800%
372,078.75
semi-annual
05/18/18
06/15/13
06/15/20
Tenn Val Aulh Cpn Strip Zero Cpn
88059EMX9
AAA
local
88,133.00
88,133.00
100,000.00
97,014.00
maturity
03/18113
none
07/15/20
McAllen TX Dev Corp
579086AW9
AAA
local
175,000.00
175,000.00
175,000.00
1.400%
172,455.50
semi-annual
07/26/16
02/15/17
08/15/20
Indianapolis Ind
45528UGF2
AAA
local
251,507.50
251,507.50
250,000.00
2.219%
249,135.00
semi-annual
07/11117
07/15/13
01/15121
Mounds View MN ISD #621
620637V88
AAA
local
378,408.80
378,408.80
385,000.00
2.050%
382,027.80
semi-annual
12120/18
none
02/01/21
Rochester MN
771588RH5
AAA
local
254,532.50
254,532.50
250,000.00
3.750%
253,800.00
semi-annual
12/19/18
none
02/01/21
Greenway MN ISD #31
39678LDF6
_
AAA
local
27,593.50
27,593.50
25,000.00
5.000%
25,000.00
semi-annual
07109/13
none
03115/21
Baltimore Cnty MD
05914FME7
AAA
local
51,290.00
51,290.00
50,000.00
2.097%
49,326.00
semi-annual
08131116
none
08/01121
New York St Mtge Agy
64988RHGO
AAA
local
100,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
2.375%
99,516.00
semi-annual
10/27/15
04/01/16
10101/21
Columbus OH
199492CS6
AAA
local
39,956.40
39,956.40
40,000.00
2.133%
39,766.00
semi-annual
02120/15
none
12101121
Outagamie Cnty Wl
689900898
AAA
local
170,000.00
170,000.00
170,000.00
2.350%
169,177.20
semi-annual
11/07/17
05/01/18
11/01122
Savage Minn
80465PAN4
AAA
local
198,018.00
198,018.00
200,000.00
4.800%
202,824.00
semi-annual
06/17/10
02/01/11
02/01/24
Connecticut State
20772JON5
At
state
214,954.00
214,954.00
200,000.00
3.517%
203,516.00
semi-annual
05/27116
02/15/14
08/15121
Massachusetts State
57582P2T6
W
state
199,744.00
199,744.00
200,000.00
2.090%
199,136.00
semi-annual
12/17/14
11/01/14
05/01120
Vermont State Hsg Fin Agy
92419RAE2
AA2
state
74,130.75
74,130.75
75,000.00
2.550%1
74,928.00
semi-annual
08128118
05/01/18
11/01121
3,696,603.03 CD
4,804,123.65 local
Description
NumbCusi
Number
Credit
Rating/F
DIC#
Type
Purchase Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
Interest Paid
Date
Acquired
Coupon
Date
Maturity)
Due Date
Florida St Hurricane
34074GDH4
AA3
stale
279,439.80
279,439.80
270,000.00
2.995%
271,198.80
semi-annual
11110/15
07/01/13
07/01/20
Minnesota Sl Colleges & Univ
60414FPJ3
AA3
state
100,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
2.000%
99,211.00
semi-annual
02/26/15
10/01115
10/01120
Florida St Dept Environmental
3416OWUAO
AA3
state
217,800.00
217,800.00
200,000.00
6.206%
201,170.00
semi-annual
08/30/10
07/01/10
07/01/22
Tennessee State
880541QQ3
AAA
state
48,218.85
48,218.85
45,000.00
3.178%
45,459.45
semi-annual
08/30/16
02101/12
08/01/20
Virginia State
928109XD4
AAA
state
22,126.00
22,126.00
20,000.00
4.100%
20,023.00
semi-annual
02/07/12
none
06/01/21
Kentucky St Hsg Corp
49130TSHO
AAA
state
203,458.00
203,458.00
200,000.00
2.780%
200,404.00
semi-annual
03/29/17
none
07/01/21
Georgia State
3733842QB
AAA
state
204,444.00
204,444.00
200,000.00
2.780%
201,476.00
semi-annual
12/13/16
none
02101/23
Fed Home Ln Bank
3130AECJ7
AAA
US
300,114.00
300,114.00
300,000.00
2.625%
300,804.00
semi-annual
07/12/18
11128/18
05128/20
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EHYM9
AAA
US
294,735.00
294,735.00
300,000.00
1.500%
296,592.00
semi-annual
01117/19
03114118
09/14/20
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Mad Tenn Note
3134GBS78
AAA
US
200.000.00
200,000.00
200,000.00
1.500%
2.680%
198,726.00
300,012.00
semi-annual
semi-annual
10/27/17
07/12/18
04127118
11/02/18
10/27/20
11/02/20
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EJMX4
AAA
US
299,475.00
299,475.00
299,193.00
300,000.00
300,000.00
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp
3137EAEK1
AAA
US
299,193.00
1.875%
298,020.00
semi-annual
12/07/17
05/17/18
11/17/20
Fed Farm Credit Bank _ _ _
Fed Nall Mtg Assn
3133EJPW3
AAA
US
299,769.00
299,769.00
300,000.00
2.700%
301,731.00
semi-annual
05/21/18
06/21/18
12/21/20
3136G4JM6
AAA
US
200,000.00
200,000.00
200,000.00
1.850%
198,392.00
semi-annual
12/28/16
06/28/17
12/28/20
Fed Home Ln Bank
3130ADF72
AAA
US
249,525.00
249,525.00
296,718.75
250,000.00
300,000.00
2.250%
249,690.00
semi-annual
04/25/19
none
01/29/21
Fed Home Ln Bank
3130ADG48
AAA
US
296,718.75
2.250%
298,662.00
semi-annual
07/10/18
07/29/18
01/29/21
Fed Home Ln Bank
3130ADME9
AAA
US
297,516.00
297,516.00
300,000.00
2.375%
300,159.00
semi-annual
07/12/18
08108118
02/08/21
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Med Tenn Note
3134G8KU2
AAA
US
246,407.50
246,407.50
250,000.00
1.250%
248,522.50
semi-annual
12/04/18
02126/19
02/26/21
Fed Farm Credit Bank
Fed Fann Credit Bank
3133EHCNI
3133EFX36
AAA
AAA
US
US
295,215.00
117,277.20
295,215.00
300,000.00
2.140%
298,956.00
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
07/10/18
01/17119
08/07/18
09/16/17
10/05/16
04/26118
03/16/21
04/05/21
04/26/21
117,277.20
120,000.00
1.680%
118,462.80
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Mad Term Note
3134GBP89
AAA
US
292,425.00
292,425.00
300,000.00
1.850%
297,174.00
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EGAH8
AAA
US
288,960.00
288,960.00
300,000.00
1.550%
295,368.00
semi-annual
10/10/18
11/17/16
05/17/21
Fed Home Ln Bank
Fed Home Ln Bank
3130A7Z73
AAA
US
US
153,217.50
153,217.50
294,030.00
155,000.00
300,000.00
1.250%
153,809.60
semi-annual
12/18/18
11/25/16
05/25/21
313OA82B8
AAA
294,030.00
1.000%
299,250.00
semi-annual
07/17118
none
05/25/21
Fed Nat] Mtg Assn
3135GOU35
AAA
US
300,249.00
300,249.00
300,000.00
2.750%
302,766.00
semi-annual
07/12118
12/22/18
06/22/21
Fed Home Ln Bank
Fed Home Ln Bank
3130ABSR5
313OA8MNO
AAA
AAA
US
US
244,531.25
194,414.00
244,531.25
194,414.00
250,000.00
200,000.00
1.000%
1.625%
248,125.00
196,500.00
semi-annual
semi-annual
07/10/18
01/25119
none
none
07/27/21
10/07121
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Med Term Note
3134GAWP5
AAA
US
245,875.00
245,875.00
250,000.00
1.900%
248,735.00
semi-annual
12/04/18
02/23/16
11/23/21
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Med Term Note
3134GSPB5
AAA
US
300,000.00
300,000.00
300,000.00
2.500%
300,126.00
semi-annual
07/02/18
12/28/18
06/28/22
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Med Term Note
3134GTGZO
AAA
US
300,000.00
300,000.00
300,000.00
2.500%
299,685.00
semi-annual
04/15/19
10/15/19
04/15/24
16,067,516.63
465452GP9
A
Itasca County Minn
local
105,024.00
105,024.00
100,000.00
5.550%
100,680.00
semi-annual
07/12/11
none
02/01/28
Mitchell SD Sch Dist W-2
606687EHO
AA
local
116,702.00
116,702.00
100,000.00
6.000%
100,404.00
semi-annual
12/20/11
06/15/19
06/15124
Ann Arbor Ml
035438CF5
AA1
local
262,025.00
262,025.00
250,000.00
5.750%
250,000.00
semi-annual
12/27117
05/01119
05/01/27
Milwaukee Cnty Wl
602245XHO
AA2
local
254,142.50
254,142.50
250,000.00
5.100%
252,410.00
semi-annual
12/24/18
10/01/19
10/01/24
Duluth MN
264438ZL9
AA2
local
29,767.20
29,767.20
30,000.00
2.625%
29,487.60
semi-annual
12/05/12
08/01/13
02/01/25
South Milwaukee WI
838855ZV9
AA2
local
327,798.25
327,798.25
325,000.00
3.350%
330,729.75
semi-annual
01/25/19
04/01/19
10/01/26
Will County IL Cmnty Zero Coupon
969078QM9
AA2
local
159,000.00
159,000.00
500,000.00
360,760.00
maturity
08/25/09
none
11/01/27
Hawkins Cnly TN
420218PL7
AA3
local
111,480.00
111,480.00
100,000.00
4.800%
100,113.00
semi-annual
03/13/12
none
05/01/24
Lake City Minn ISD #813
508084DW7
AAA
local
103,933.00
103,933.00
100,000.00
5.000°k
101,462.00
semi-annual
05/11/11
none
02/01/25
Tennessee Valley Auth Ser E
880591CJ9
AAA
local
121,500.00
121,500.00
100,000.00
6.750%1
124,570.00
semi-annual
03/19/09
none
11/01125
1,516,522.25 state
6,050,267.90 US
1- 5 Years
Description
Number
bo
Credit Rating/F
DIC #
Type
Purchase Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
Date
Acquired
Coupon
Date
Maturity/
Due Date
Minneapolis MN Spl Sch Dist#1
Ice Deposit- National Sports Center
6037893UO
none
_AAA
local
local
268,815.00
250,000.00
268,815.00
300,000.00
1.150%
268,089.00
semi-annual
04/22/19
none
12/15/25
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
maturity
02/06/08
none
01/01/26
Fed Home Ln Bank
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3130A8W33
AAA
US
39,000.00
39,000.00
40,000.00
2.100%
38,388.80
semi-annual
07/27/17
08/22/17
08/22/25
31331VLCB
AAA
US
106,030.45
106,030.45
100,000.00
5.250%
119,069.00
semi-annual
02/26/10
none
04/21/28
W
2,426,163.15
Van Buren Mich Public Schools
920729HD5
I local
102.750.00
102,750.00
100,000.00
.4 .1
100,000.00
semi-annual
07/17/09
11I01I09
05/01/29
Anoka -Hennepin MN ISD#11
036303285
AAA
local
323,613.50
323,613.50
350,000.00
2.550%
327,999.00
semi-annual
01/25/19
none
02/01/30
427,999.00
36,093,632.17
2,268,705.35 local
157,457.80 US
6 - 30 Years
427,999.00 local
10+ Years
INVESTMENT SCHEDULE - Money Market Funds
April 30, 2019
Description
Current Market
Value
YTD Interest
Wells Fargo
I Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund
$27477,936.14
$16,180.52
4M
4M
1,027,143.091
7,288.07
4M PLUS
4M Plus
8,552-901
62.10
4M PLUS - CIP Bonds
I 14M Plus - CIP Bonds
9,719,392.081
49,211.43
Grand Total Money Market Funds 1 $13,233,024.21 1 $72,742.12
Updated: 511512019