HomeMy WebLinkAboutWK - April 30, 20191685 CROSSTOWN
"t-
BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
City Council Workshop
Tuesday, April 30, 2019
Council Chambers
Call to Order — immediately after the 6:00 p.m. Special City Council Meeting; Workshop
will also recess at 7:00 p.m. for the Board of Review then reconvene immediately after that
meeting.
2. Pedestrian Crossing Discussion - Engineering
2020-2024 CIP Development Discussion — Administration
4. 2020 Budget Development Discussion —Administration
2019 Budget Progress Report —Administration
6. 2019 City Investments Review—Administration
7. Other Business
Adjournment
Y O%F
OVE.
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Council Members
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
David Berkowitz, Director
Pedestrian Crossing Discussion - - Engineering
April 30, 2019
Engineer
INTRODUCTION
The Mayor has requested that the City Council discuss pedestrian crossing treatments, specifically at the
intersection of Nightingale Street NW and Veterans Memorial Boulevard (VMB) where a new leg of
VMB will be extended east to Tower Drive.
DISCUSSION
Attached information is provided for City Council review on pedestrian crossing and when they are
warranted through guidance from MNDOT. Also attached is a specific crossing enhancement
("Additional Treatment Considerations") called a "Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Signal System" that would
be considered a minimum requirement for Nightingale and VMB if the Council would like to pursue a
pedestrian crossing at this location. situation.
The speed limit on Nightingale is 55MPH and the average daily traffic is 5600 cars per day. Painted
crosswalks are not recommended for this situation unless there are additional treatments considerations
installed. The "Hybrid Beacon" system is the option that would meet the criteria for "Additional
Treatment Considerations".
This system was installed in Coon Rapids in 2012 on Round Lake Boulevard south of Main Street. The
cost in 2012 was $40,000 for the signal which did not include getting power to the site or other
improvements such as pedestrian ramps and Engineering. At today's cost the estimated cost for the
signal would be between $60,000 to $70,000 with other improvement cost of $30,000 to $40,000 for a
total estimate project cost of $90,000 to $110,000.
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to discuss the information provided and direct staff on how to proceed
with a potential pedestrian crossings at Nightingale Street NW and VMB.
Respectfully submitted,
It
David D. Berkowitz, P.E.
Attachments: MNDOT Tech Memo No. 15-01-T-01 (Pedestrian Crossing Facilitation), Pedestrian
Hybrid Beacon Signals Information✓
��NNEgOjq
o y MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
yof Engineering Services Division
Technical Memorandum No. 15-01-T-01
F ; January 7, 2015
�OFTVt
To: Electronic Distribution Recipients
From: Nancy T. Daubenberger, P. E. to
Division Director, Engineering Services
Subject: Pedestrian Crossing Facilitation
Expiration
This is a new Technical Memorandum and shall remain in effect until January 7, 2020 unless superseded
prior to that date.
Implementation
The guidance and procedures in this Technical Memorandum are effective immediately for all new
construction, reconstruction, and all preservation projects that meet the ADA curb ramp upgrade
threshold in tech memo 10 -02 -TR -01 on Minnesota's Trunk Highway System. This guidance supersedes
the design guidance laid forth in the Traffic Engineering Manual.
To the maximum extent practicable, projects that are currently moving through planning and design
phases should implement these procedures.
Introduction
The Traffic Engineering Manual contains guidance for crosswalk markings but it does not consider new
treatments that have been developed for pedestrian crossings, nor does it contain guidance about where
to place pedestrian crossings.
Placing crosswalk markings and facilitating pedestrian crosswalk markings will often be dependent on
context and should include looking for short term solutions before implementing long term fixes. Many
factors are involved in determining the need for and solution to pedestrian crossing enhancements
This Technical Memorandum describes locations where pedestrian crossing enhancements should be
provided and whether or not they should be marked or enhanced in other ways. Pedestrian crossing
facilitation should be considered as early as scoping, and issues should be tracked to be able to correct
issues in the future.
Purpose
The purpose of this Technical Memorandum is to provide users with guidance regarding pedestrian
crosswalk markings, where to install curb ramps, and pedestrian crossing enhancements.
Guidelines
Pedestrian Crossing Facilitation
This section describes locations where facilitated crossing opportunities should be provided for
pedestrians at signalized and unsignalized intersections. Regardless of pavement markings,
pedestrians are afforded the legal right to cross the street at all intersections unless specifically
prohibited. (MN Statute 169.21 Subd. 1 and Subd.2
(hftps://www.revisor.mn.00v/statutes/?id=169&view=chai)ter#stat.169.21))
According to MN Statute 169.011 Subd. 20
(hftps://wwwrevisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=169.011&year=2013&keyword type=all&keyword=crosswal
k), the definition of a crosswalk is:
-MORE-
Technical Memorandum No. 15-01-T-01
Pedestrian Crossing Facilitation
January 7, 2015
Page 2
"Crosswalk" means (1) that portion of a roadway ordinarily included with the prolongation or
connection of the lateral lines of sidewalks at intersections; (2) any portion of a roadway
distinctly indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markings on the surface.
Although every intersection affords pedestrians the legal right to cross regardless of the existence
of sidewalks (unless specifically prohibited), pedestrian signal heads, or curb ramps; providing
convenient access for all users is an important consideration.
Curb Ramp Installation
Note: the installation of curb ramps at unsignalized crossings does not necessitate the installation
of crosswalk markings. See the "crosswalk marking" section for further guidance.
At a crossing, sidewalks and trails should always have curb ramps. Exceptions to this are:
• if an alternate route is provided due to measurable safety concerns (such as unresolvable
sight distance issues or crash history) with the crossing; or
• if the phasing at a signalized intersection is not possible, or prohibited. See "Prohibiting
Pedestrian Crossings' section for more information.
Curb ramps should be installed where there is indication of regular pedestrian activities (aka "goat
paths" see Figure 1). Pedestrians should be accommodated at the location of the goat path. If the
location of the goat path cannot physically be made accessible, an attempt should be made to
provide an equally convenient alternate crossing. If a goat path is present, installing a sidewalk or
shared use path should be investigated
as an option. Installations of curb ramps
or sidewalks/shared use paths should be
coordinated with any bicycle or
pedestrian plans as well as with the ADA
Transition Plan.
See Figures 5 and 6 for the following
text. Sidewalks or trails that end at a
shoulder or an intersection shall have a
curb ramp to allow users to enter and , j'
exit the sidewalk or trail system. Where a #
sidewalk or trail system runs parallel to a
roadway but there are no perpendicular ;
sidewalks or trails to destinations, curb Figure 1: "Goat Path"
ramps should be provided perpendicular
to the sidewalk system. When placing curb ramps perpendicular to a sidewalk system, only one
side of an intersection needs to have a crossing. These crossings should be chosen based on the
side of the street with the least conflicts (i.e., trees, drainage grates, etc.). These ramps should be
spaced so that a pedestrian would not have to travel further than 660 feet (1/8 mile) out of their way
to access to the sidewalk or trail system. T -intersections should always include a perpendicular
curb ramp to a sidewalk because pedestrians have no other options to access the sidewalk from
that point. T -intersections create an ADA barrier and should have a perpendicular curb ramp for
access to the sidewalk system. Where a sidewalk system ends a ramp shall be added at the end of
the system terminating either into the shoulder or the street.
On the side of the street without sidewalk curb ramps would only be needed when 1) a striped
crosswalk or signed crossing exists or 2) there is no shoulder to receive the crosswalk (see Figures
3 and 7).
-MORE-
Technical Memorandum No. 15-01-T-01
Pedestrian Crossing Facilitation
January 7, 2015
Page 3
As a last resort a grade -compliant driveway may be used to receive a crossing. If it is decided to not
place a curb ramp at any of the locations illustrated in Figures 3-7 an engineering study shall be
completed documenting a lack of need and shall be kept in the project file. The engineering study
shall follow the guidelines set forth in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MNMUTCD).
Curb ramp placement will often depend on context. More curb ramps may be needed depending on
the context of the location. Crossings should connect destinations/pedestrian generators.
Pedestrian generators are locations that influence pedestrian volume by acting as a source or
destination of pedestrians, including, but not limited to:
• housing (paying special attention to vulnerable users such as senior or assisted living
facilities)
• restaurants
• shopping
• hotels
• schools
• places of worship
• transit station
• parks
• museums
• gas stations
• civic buildings (libraries, post offices, etc.)
• health care facilities
Pedestrian generators will create pedestrian traffic regardless of the size of the road, the speed of
traffic, the ADT, crossing facilitation, or presence/absence of sidewalks. That being said, if the road
is difficult to cross or there are not adequate facilities but there are generators, there is likely pent
up demand for pedestrian facilities. As long as there is a lack of measurable safety issues (sight
distance, crash history) providing pedestrian crossing facilitation where pedestrians are already
crossing can make the crossing safer. Regardless of the distance between crossings at
unsignalized corners with sidewalks or trails, curb ramps should be provided from the sidewalk or
trail system to access a pedestrian generator/destination, whether it is parallel or perpendicular to
the sidewalk or trail (See Figures 5 and 6).
Small segments of sidewalk should be installed to connect parking lots to sidewalk or trail systems
(See Figure 8). Often these connections provide the shortest path for pedestrians and in the
absence of installing these sidewalks goat paths will likely be created. These improvements should
be coordinated with property owners as redevelopment occurs. The Cost Participation Policy
should be consulted for funding these segments of sidewalk. Maintenance agreements will also
need to be in place.
Midblock curb ramps should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis; much of the same guidance
laid out in this section can be used. Midblock crossings may be necessary at some locations. An
analysis of context, location, volume, need, traffic operations will assist in determining whether a
midblock crossing is appropriate.
-MORE-
Technical Memorandum No. 15-01-T-01
Pedestrian Crossing Facilitation
January 7, 2015
Page 4
Signalized Pedestrian Crossings
Signalized intersections will sometimes merit the installation of curb ramps and Accessible
Pedestrian Signals (APS) push buttons even without sidewalk connections. Curb ramps are
necessary for ADA purposes in order to use APS push buttons. Crossings should be provided for
all of the reasons listed in the "Curb Ramp Installation" section and destinations should be
connected regardless of the existence of sidewalk or trail. Shoulders can be classified as a
pedestrian facility leading up to a signal. Shoulders are a legal walking area for pedestrians when
there is no sidewalk.
If crossings are provided on three legs of a signalized intersection, a crossing should be provided
on the fourth leg of the intersection unless a severe operational problem (i.e., operations at LOS F
for a movement) or a measurable safety issue (i.e., sight distance, crash history) is present on the
fourth leg. This is to decrease pedestrian exposure and increase safety so that pedestrians can
choose to cross one leg instead of crossing three. It also increases pedestrian level of service
(LOS) if pedestrians can choose to cross one leg instead of three to get to one destination. It is
important to remember that pedestrians are the most vulnerable user, and sometimes exposed to
harsh weather conditions without protection. Minimizing pedestrian wait time is an important safety
and LOS concern.
Some quadrants of signalized intersections may not contain a destination or require a pedestrian
crossing. Some signalized intersections are in locations without sidewalks or trails and where little
to no pedestrian or bicycle activity is expected. At these locations selected pedestrian crossings
may be excluded from design. An engineering study should be completed recording existing
conditions and lack of pedestrian generators in the area and expected pedestrian paths. The study
should be kept with the project file.
Prohibiting Pedestrian Crossin
Pedestrian crossings may be prohibited if allowing the pedestrian crossing would
severely impact vehicular traffic operations and an equally convenient alternate path
for pedestrians is available. Judgment of when operations are severely affected
should be decided by the District Traffic Engineer after consultation with local
agency(s), ADA, and the bike and pedestrian section as necessary. One example of
an acceptable location to prohibit pedestrian crossings is at the inner legs of ramp •
interchange intersections due to the fact that the crossing would be a redundant Figure 2: R9 -3a
route and affect LOS. If safety issues are present, such as a sight distance problem
(for either sidewalk/shared use path users or roadway users) and it is deemed not
feasible/possible to correct or eliminate the problem, the pedestrian crossing should be prohibited.
Install "No Pedestrian Crossing Signs" (R9 -3a — see Figure 2) in locations where it is deemed
necessary to prohibit pedestrian crossings.
R9 -3a sign use should be judicious and limited in order to retain effectiveness. At locations where
only very occasional pedestrian activity is expected, a good rule of thumb is to never strand a
pedestrian in a quadrant by prohibiting crossings. If no convenient alternate route is available (a
reasonable distance to walk in a suburban or rural setting is approximately 660') then pedestrians
should not be legally prohibited (i.e., by installing an R9 -3a sign) from using the signal indications to
cross even if a pedestrian signal head is not provided. The following items should be considered
when deciding whether to prohibit pedestrian crossings at a signal:
• The presence of medians (If crossings are prohibited where would a wheelchair cross? Will
snow prohibit pedestrian crossings in the winter?)
Crossing distance and number of lanes
• Speed
-MORE-
Technical Memorandum No. 15-01-T-01
Pedestrian Crossing Facilitation
January 7, 2015
Page 5
• AADT
• Phasing complexity
• Minimum green time (short minimum green times across 4 -lane roadways mean that
pedestrians will not be able to cross far enough to be seen and a crossing should be
provided of at least one leg)
• Whether the side street is on recall
• Railroad preemption (consideration should be given to eliminating a pedestrian crossing to
avoid excessively long preemption lead times)
• T -intersections (pedestrians approaching from the unsignalized leg do not have a green
ball to cross with and will not know when to cross)
• Presence of adjacent signals (statute 169.21 Subd. 3(c )
(https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=169.21&vear=2013&keyword tvpe=all&keyword=
crosswalk ) prohibits a pedestrian crossing the road between two signalized intersections)
• Context
• Pedestrian generators/destinations
If a grade separated crossing is nearby (within 660'), it is unnecessary to prohibit crossings at
nearby signalized or unsignalized intersections unless operations are severely impacted or a
measurable (sight distance, crash history) safety issue is present. Grade separated crossings
should be as convenient (placement should be optimized and grade change minimized for
pedestrians) as possible to reap the safety benefits of grade separation. Allowing the at -grade
crossing gives opportunities for those who find the grade separated crossing more difficult, whether
because of the crossings location, distance to the crossing, or the user's mobility issues, to use the
at -grade option.
At semi -rural, 4 -lane, high speed (45 mph or greater), roads that intersect with a two lane lower
volume road; a crossing on one leg of the main road should be provided while prohibiting
pedestrians on the other leg of the main road (if desired). Pedestrians would then be allowed to use
the vehicle signal face to cross parallel to the main road (See Figure 4).
Crosswalk Markings
This section describes locations where crosswalk markings or additional crossing enhancement
should be considered. Marking crosswalks alone does not improve safety, but does delineate an
approved path to alert pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists of potential pedestrian movements
across a roadway. No research states that marking crosswalks creates a false sense of security. In
fact, research is unclear about why marking crosswalks sometimes appears to decrease safety
because it has shown that pedestrians actually scan the street more at marked crosswalks and
after installing marked crosswalks motor vehicle speeds tend to decrease. The most reasonable
explanation has been that more vulnerable users (elderly, children) tend to use marked crosswalks.
At intersection locations, pedestrians have the legal right to cross. At non -intersection locations
crosswalk markings legally establish the crosswalk. Before placing crosswalk markings or other
crossing treatments at unsignalized locations, an engineering study should be completed to
determine the necessity and feasibility of pedestrian crossing treatments. One option is to use the
methodology set forth in the guide "Pedestrian Crossings: Uncontrolled Locations."
(http://www.mnitap.umn.edu/publications/handbooks/documents/ped guidebook.pdf ) An
engineering study can be as simple as a site review and notes. The study should include input from
stakeholders such as ADA, the Bike/Ped unit, local units of government, and any bicycle and
pedestrian plans. The study should consider the following information:
• Geometrics
-MORE-
Technical Memorandum No. 15-01-T-01
Pedestrian Crossing Facilitation
January 7, 2015
Page 6
• Sight distance
• Traffic volumes, truck traffic, turning movements, queues from adjacent intersections
• Pedestrian/bicycle volumes (methodology included in the FHWA Traffic Monitoring Guide)
• Site observations and driver distractions
• Posted speed limit
• Crash history
• Requests for a crosswalk/crossing facilitation
• Existing pedestrian/bicycle crossing facilities (at intersection and along corridor)
• Nearby transit stops
• Surrounding land use and pedestrian/bicycle generators
Some of this information, particularly volumes, may not be available or easily maintained. Context
and season should also be kept in mind. If a location near a beach is being reviewed in the winter
you may never see a critical volume of pedestrians, while a location near a school in the summer
may not show the volumes you would see during a school year. Origins and destinations could be
considered as a stand-in for volumes. See bulleted list under "Curb Ramp Installation" section.
Installation Criteria
Crosswalk markings should be installed at all legs of signalized intersections that have pedestrian
facilities. Channelized right turn movements should follow the criteria of an unsignalized crosswalk,
discussed below. Crosswalk markings should be installed at all pedestrian crossings at
roundabouts.
The following criteria should be considered for marking unsignalized crosswalks:
• Locations for a marked crosswalk should be connected by sidewalks or trails and have
ADA compliant curb ramps and landings.
• Parking will be prohibited at least 20 feet prior to and after a marked crosswalk (Minnesota
Statute 169.34
(https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=169.34&vear=2013&kevword tvge=all&kevword=
crosswalk )).
• Crosswalk markings and advanced warning signs should not be installed at stop -controlled
locations, although additional pedestrian treatments such as curb extensions and medians
can be installed if an engineering study indicates a need.
• Crosswalk markings and signs (S1-1) should be installed at all uncontrolled crossings along
approved school crossings or crossings included in a Safe Route to School plan. An
intersection near a school will not necessarily be marked with a crosswalk; it needs to be
included as an approved crossing or in a Safe Routes to School plan in order to be marked.
Additional crossing enhancements should be considered at school crossing locations by
analyzing the crossing with Figure 9 and Table 1 (See the "Pedestrian Crossing
Facilitation" section for more information on school crossings).
• Crosswalk markings should generally not be installed at channelized right turn movements.
Some channelized right turn movements may benefit from treatments such as signing and
other enhancements and should always include appropriate geometrics to control speed,
such as tight radii and appropriate crosswalk placement, while serving the typical vehicle
within the corridor.
-MORE-
Technical Memorandum No. 15-01-T-01
Pedestrian Crossing Facilitation
January 7, 2015
Page 7
Midblock crossings should be carefully evaluated for markings and additional treatments. Midblock
crossings may be unexpected by motorists. Unmarked midblock crossings afford pedestrians no
legal right of way (Minnesota Statute 169.21, Subd. 3(a)
(https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=169.21&year=2013&keyword type=all&keyword=crosswal
k )), and pedestrians must yield to cars, therefore unmarked midblock crosswalks should be limited
to low ADT, low speed locations. Additional crossing facilitation should be considered at these
locations. If a midblock crossing is between two signalized intersections, it shall be marked
(Minnesota Statute 169.21 Subd. 3(c)
k )).
yG Some unsignalized locations may not qualify for marked crosswalks. Locations where the speed
/^ limit is 45 mph or greater, locations where pedestrian traffic occurs below the threshold volumes, or
locations w eri e f e -re are no sidewalks, trails, or ramps but regular pedestrian traffic still occurs do
not qualify for striping. See MN MUTCD Section 313.18 for more information.
Additional Treatment Considerations
A marked crosswalk alone may not be enough to facilitate safe and efficient pedestrian movements.
Pedestrian crossing enhancements have been shown to significantly improve motorist yielding
behavior. Advance and crosswalk -located warning signs, prohibiting parking prior to the crossing,
medians, curb extensions, reduced corner radii, advance stop lines, raised crosswalks, crosswalk
lighting, rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs), in -roadway lights, Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon
Systems (see MN MUTCD Section 4F), pedestrian signals (see MN MUTCD Section 4C.5), grade
separation, and other enhanced crossing treatments should be considered at locations where an
engineering study indicates a need. Short term solutions can be implemented while waiting for the
long term ultimate solution. Engineering judgment, research, and national best practices need to be
used to find the best treatment for each unique location.
Coordination with maintenance staff should occur to ensure efficient snow removal in areas such as
median cut-throughs. See Figure 9 and Table 1 for determining the need for a crosswalk and other
crossing enhancements.
Locations that do not qualify for marked crosswalks should still be given consideration for other
crossing enhancements. Treatments such as lighting, eliminating sight distance issues, curb ramps,
curb extensions, and median cut-throughs can benefit all types of pedestrian crossings whether
they are marked or not. The following mitigation measures should be considered for all corridors
where pedestrian activity occurs, and all legal crossings regardless of whether they are marked or
not:
• Calm traffic by narrowing or removing lanes, adding bike lanes, widening sidewalks,
providing curb extensions and planting trees. All of these can be used to slow traffic flow
and increase the expectation of pedestrian activity by the driver.
• Remove and relocate obstructions, add curb extensions, and add illumination to address
visibility. Curb extensions place pedestrians within the drivers' field of vision, and allow for a
shorter pedestrian crossing distance at the same time.
• Tighten turn radii.
• Install median islands to simplify crossings into two steps. Porkchop right turn islands can
simplify the crossing even further. Access management can be used to eliminate turn lanes
and turning conflicts.
• Move bus stops to the downstream side of the crosswalk.
• Prohibit on street parking 20-50 feet upstream and downstream of a crosswalk. Providing
greater visibility should be balanced against traffic calming, as some measures to improve
visibility may increase speeds.
-MORE-
Technical Memorandum No. 15-01-T-01
Pedestrian Crossing Facilitation
January 7, 2015
Page 8
Installation and Removal Guidelines
It is important for pedestrian, bicyclist, and driver expectation and compliance that crossing
treatments are applied appropriately and consistently. Overuse of crosswalk markings and
electronic enhancements such as flashers, beacons, and pedestrian signals should be avoided to
maximize their effectiveness. Crosswalks and signs should be used at locations that meet the
minimum pedestrian volume thresholds to avoid deteriorating effectiveness by overuse. Electronic
enhancements may lose their effectiveness over time and usually have much higher ongoing
maintenance costs. Electronic enhancements should be limited to locations with higher needs and
where more standard engineering options (medians, curb extensions, etc.) are not effective or are
infeasible.
Electronic crossing enhancements, such as in -roadway lighting, pedestrian flashers, and RRFBs
should always be pedestrian -activated (either passively or actively) and meet ADA requirements for
activation.
Conditions that contribute to the need for a crossing treatment may change over time. When a
roadway is to be resurfaced a review of existing crosswalks should be performed to determine
whether the need for a crosswalk continues to exist. If the crossing no longer meets the guidelines,
it should be removed. A review of the surrounding area should be conducted at this time to
determine if pedestrian traffic has shifted to another nearby location that may need consideration or
if conditions are affecting/compromising the pedestrian crossing volumes.
Approval of Local Requests
The District Traffic Engineer shall approve the proposed location for the crosswalk and/or
pedestrian crossing enhancement. Prior to installation, the proposed location must have met the
requirements of an engineering study as described above and have a request from the local agency
requesting a marked crosswalk or other crossing enhancement.
If approved, the applicant will need to (unless otherwise agreed upon)
• Work with MnDOT to determine cost share according to the Cost Participation Policy of the
crosswalk or crossing enhancement
• Apply for a MnDOT permit to install the system in the Right of Way. As part of the permit
the applicant will agree to:
o Install crosswalk pavement markings (if not currently present) or refresh existing
crosswalk pavement markings at the crossing
o Install or refresh existing 'no parking' yellow curb, 20 feet in advance of, and 20 feet
beyond the crossing
o Be responsible for installing, operating and maintaining the crossing system and
associated curb and pavement markings to MnDOT standards; along with all costs
associated with said responsibilities
o Allow MnDOT to remove the system at their discretion
• If removed by MnDOT, static pedestrian or school crossing signs may be installed by
MnDOT in place of the system
Provide an operations plan to MnDOT upon installation and provide an updated plan to the District
Traffic Engineer if ever revised.
-MORE-
Technical Memorandum No. 15-01-T-01
Pedestrian Crossing Facilitation
January 7, 2015
Page 9
References
1. Mead, Jill; Zegeer, Charlie; and Bushell, Max. Evaluation of Pedestrian -Related Roadway
Measures: A Summary of Available Research. FHWA DTFH61-11-H-00024, FHWA, April 2013.
2. Traffic Engineering Division, Virginia Department of Transportation. Guidelines for the
Installation of Marked Crosswalks.
3. Fitzpatrick, Kay; Turner, Shawn; Brewer, Marcus; Carlson, Paul; Ullman, Brooke; Trout, Nada;
Park Eun Sug; Whitacre, Jeff; Lalani, Nazir; and Lord, Dominique. Improving Pedestrian Safety
at Unsignalized Crossings. NCHRP Report 562, TCRP Report 112, 2006.
4. Zegeer, Charles V.; Stewart, Richard; Huang, Herman H.; Lagerwey, Peter A.; Feaganes, John;
and Campbell, B.J.. Safety Effects of Marked versus Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled
Intersections: Final Report and Recommended Guidelines. USDOT, FHWA HRT -04-100,
September 2005.
5. City of Boulder Transportation Division and Fox Tuttle. Pedestrian Crossing Treatment
Installation Guidelines. City of Boulder, November 2011.
6. Fitzpatrick, Kay; Chrysler, Susan T.; Van Houten, Ron; Hunter, William W.; and Turner, Shawn.
Evaluation of Pedestrian and Bicycle Engineering Countermeasures: Rectangular Rapid -
Flashing Beacons, HAWKS, Sharrows, Crosswalk Markings, and the Development of an
Evaluation Methods Report. FHWA HRT -11-039, FHWA, April 2011.
7. NCITE. Best Practices for Traffic Control at Regional Trail Crossings. NCITE, July 2011.
8. NCITE. Guidance for the Installation of Pedestrian Crossing Facilities. NCITE, January 2009.
9. Lambert, William R, New Hampshire DOT. Marked Crosswalks. NHDOT #PM -09, NHDOT
October 2007.
10. Oregon Department of Transportation Roadway Section. Traffic Manual Section 6.6
Crosswalks. ODOT, December 2012.
11. Director, Bureau of Traffic Operations, Wisconsin DOT. Traffic Guidelines Manual. WisDOT 3-
2-18, WisDOT, March 2011.
Questions
Any questions regarding the technical provisions of this Technical Memorandum can be addressed to
the following:
• Melissa Barnes, Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Engineer, Office of Traffic, Safety and
Technology at (651) 234-7376
Any questions regarding publication of this Technical Memorandum should be referred to the Design
Standards Unit, DesionStandards.DOT aestate.mn.us. A link to all active and historical Technical
Memoranda can be found at http://techmemos.dot.state.mn.us/techmemo.asi)x.
To add, remove, or change your name on the Technical Memoranda mailing list, please visit the web
page http://techmemos.dot.state.mn.us/subscribe.aspx
Attachments:
Figures 3-9
Table 1
-END-
January 2015
No Sidewalk
* Optional crosswalk marking at unsignalized locations.
�k * A curb ramp without a sidewalk should be installed:
1) At an unsignalized location with a marked or
signed crosswalk,
2) Where there is no shoulder to receive a
pedestrian (see Figure 7).
See text for further diccussion.
CURB RAMPS ALONG PARALLEL
AND PERPENDICULAR ROUTES
31k or
iil
FIGURE
3
Side
Street
O
1
Main
—� Road
W
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SCHEME AT FIGURE
January 2015 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION 4
End of Sidewalk
System
No Perpendicular
Sidewalks
T -intersection with
No Perpendicular
Sidewalks
Two Sidewalks
Perpendicular to
the Through
Sidewalk
Ramps shall be
placed for
entrance/exit at the
end of a sidewalk.
Pick a side of the
street to cross. Cross
at a minimum every
660' or at every
pedestrian generator.
Line ramp up with
shoulder. Pick a side
of the street.
Connect all through
sidewalks.
RAMP INSTALLATION WITH SIDEWALK ON ONE FIGURE
January 2015 SIDE OF STREET 5
No Perpendicular
Sidewalks
One Perpendicular
Sidewalk
T -intersection with
No Perpendicular
Sidewalks
One -Way
Perpendicular
Sidewalk Extensions
End of Sidewalk
System
!,,01 - is
Pick a side of the
street to cross.
Cross at a minimum
every 660' or at every
-edestrian generator.
Oust cross on corner
with perpendicular
sidewalk.
Pick a side of the
street to cross.
Cross wherever a
sidewalk is
approaching
perpendicular to a
parallel system.
amps shall be placed
r entrance/exit to the
iewalk system at the
end of a sidewalk.
RAMP INSTALLATION WITH SIDEWALK ON BOTH FIGURE
January 2015 SIDES OF THE STREET 6
1
FIGURE
January 2015 REFUGE AREA WITHOUT SIDEWALK 7
Parking Lot
FIGURE
January 2015 I SHORTEST PATH SIDEWALK
Is the crossing at an approved school yes
Install marked crosswalk
crossing or on a safe routes to
school plan?
Consider unmarked
No
Go to Table 1
pedestrian facilitation
No
Feasible
Is the pedestrian volume
greater or equal to 20
Does the engineering study
Is the pedestrian volume
Direct pedestrians to the
people/hour or l5
Yes
Indicateaneed and have
No
greater ore equal to 20
g q
Yes Remove
Infeasible
nearest facilitated crossing or
people/hour with an
to both
adequate visibility for
9 st
to either
or
peoplehour
ctor
obstructioness
consider a signal, beacon, or
g
elderly/school facility
motorists and pedestrians?
with/hour
with a
consider access control.
co
grade separation.
nearby?`
of facility
elderly/school neo
elder) school facilit nearby?'
Y/ Y Y'
Yes
No
No
Is the nearest
marked/facilitated crossing
Does the crossing serve regular
pedestrian traffic/pedestrianF
I
No
NOAction
less than 300'away?'
generators (i.e., transit stop)?
Go to Table 1
Yes
Direct pedestrians to the
nearest facilitated
crossing.
Yes
Consider unmarked
pedestrian facilitiatlon?
Notes
1. Urban, suburban, and rural locations may vary in this classification. Urban may want to use locations that have higher volumes than the surrounding crossings. Rural locations may want to mark locations
that have regular pedestrian crossings but may never meet the 20 pedestrians/hour minimum.
2. A reasonable walking distance is 660' in some suburban/rural applications, urban marked crossings should never be closer than 150'.
3. See the "Additional Treatment Considerations' section for more Information.
January 2015I UNSIGNALIZED MARKED CROSSWALK INSTALLATION FLOWCHART FIGURE
9
Shoo
Treatment Descriptions:
A. Consider marked crosswalk and signs
Guidance: Consider installing marked crosswalk with advance warning signs (W11-2); use 51-1 signs for school crossings. Consider in -roadway (RI -6) or overhead (RI -9b) signs.
B. Consider marked crosswalk with enhanced signs (RS -6 or R3 -9b) and/or geometric improvements
Guidance: Consider installing treatment options from Type A treatments. Add curb extensions or median refuge islands.
C. Consider marked crosswalk with signs, geometric improvements, and pedestrian activated warning devices°
Guidance: Consider installing o raised median refuge island if one is not present. Consider installing marked crosswalk and appropriate crossing signs along with o pedestrian activated warning device (i.e.,
RRFB). Consider adding curb extensions if possible.
D. Do not install marked crosswalk. '
Guidance.: Consider pedestrian hybrid beacon, pedestrian traffic signal, or grade separated crossing.
Specific Notes:
1. Advanced stop lines and signing (131-51a or c) should be used whenever possible if a multiple threat crash issue is present. Overhead signing, RRFBS or other overhead treatments should be used
to mitigate multiple threat crash risks.
2. Do not install a marked crosswalk where there are 3 or more through lanes per direction. Consider a pedestrian hybrid beacon, pedestrian traffic signal, or grade separated crossing.
3. Traffic calming measures should be considered to reduce speed.
4. If a median cannot be or is not currently installed go to Treatment Type D.
5. Minimum acceptable median width to provide a refuge is 6 feet.
General Notes:
1. Adding crosswalks alone will not make crossings safer, result In more vehicles stopping for pedestrians, nor will they necessarily create a false sense of security.
2. Crosswalks have not been proven to create a false sense of security - research shows that pedestrians scan the road more at marked crosswalks.
3. Whether a crosswalk is marked or not, additional crossing enhancements should be considered. See the "Additional Treatment Considerations" section.
4. See MUTCD Section 38.18 for additional guidance on using this table.
5. Lanes are total cross section.
JANUARY 2015 Pedestrian Facility Treatments
TABLE
Vehice ADT< 9,000
Vehicle ACT >9,000-12,000
Vehicle ACT> 12,000-15,000
Vehicle ACT> 15,000
Roadway Configuration Ls
s 30 mph
35 mph
40 mph
z 45 mph
5 30 mph
35 mph
40 mph
a 45 mph
s 30 mph
35 mph
40 mph
k 45 mph
5 30 mph
35 mph
40 mph
>_ 45 mph
2 lanes with or without a
raised median)
A
A
B
D
A
A
B
D
A
A
C
D
A
B
C
D
3lanes with raised median
A
A
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
C
C
D
B
C
C
D
3 lanes without raised
median
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
Is
B
C
D
B
C
C
D
Multilane (4 or more lanes)
with raised median'1
A
A
C
D
I A
1 B
1 C
I D
I A
I 8
I C
D
C
I C
C
D
Multilane (4 or more lanes)
I
without raised median'
A
C
C
D
B
C
C
D
C
C
C
D
C
C
C
D
Treatment Descriptions:
A. Consider marked crosswalk and signs
Guidance: Consider installing marked crosswalk with advance warning signs (W11-2); use 51-1 signs for school crossings. Consider in -roadway (RI -6) or overhead (RI -9b) signs.
B. Consider marked crosswalk with enhanced signs (RS -6 or R3 -9b) and/or geometric improvements
Guidance: Consider installing treatment options from Type A treatments. Add curb extensions or median refuge islands.
C. Consider marked crosswalk with signs, geometric improvements, and pedestrian activated warning devices°
Guidance: Consider installing o raised median refuge island if one is not present. Consider installing marked crosswalk and appropriate crossing signs along with o pedestrian activated warning device (i.e.,
RRFB). Consider adding curb extensions if possible.
D. Do not install marked crosswalk. '
Guidance.: Consider pedestrian hybrid beacon, pedestrian traffic signal, or grade separated crossing.
Specific Notes:
1. Advanced stop lines and signing (131-51a or c) should be used whenever possible if a multiple threat crash issue is present. Overhead signing, RRFBS or other overhead treatments should be used
to mitigate multiple threat crash risks.
2. Do not install a marked crosswalk where there are 3 or more through lanes per direction. Consider a pedestrian hybrid beacon, pedestrian traffic signal, or grade separated crossing.
3. Traffic calming measures should be considered to reduce speed.
4. If a median cannot be or is not currently installed go to Treatment Type D.
5. Minimum acceptable median width to provide a refuge is 6 feet.
General Notes:
1. Adding crosswalks alone will not make crossings safer, result In more vehicles stopping for pedestrians, nor will they necessarily create a false sense of security.
2. Crosswalks have not been proven to create a false sense of security - research shows that pedestrians scan the road more at marked crosswalks.
3. Whether a crosswalk is marked or not, additional crossing enhancements should be considered. See the "Additional Treatment Considerations" section.
4. See MUTCD Section 38.18 for additional guidance on using this table.
5. Lanes are total cross section.
JANUARY 2015 Pedestrian Facility Treatments
TABLE
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Signals
New to Omaha, Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon signals have been providing
multiple benefits to other cities around the country for years. Read on to
find out more about what they are, how they work, and how they help.
WHAT IS A PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACON SIGNAL?
A Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon signal (also known as a High intensity Activated
crossWalK, or HAWK beacon) is a type of traffic signal which creates a safer and
more efficient environment for pedestrians to cross busy streets. Pedestrian Hy-
brid Beacon (PHB) signals replace traditional 'RedNellow/Green' pedestrian
crossing signals. PHB signals are in line with Federal standards and have been
around since the late 1990s; in fact, they are already in use in many cities around
the country.
The first
PHB signal
to be in-
stalled in
Omaha will
be on 50th
Street be-
tween "G"
Street and "I"
Street,
STOP
where the
ON
new South
R E D
Omaha trail
crosses 50th /
Street. Trail
users will be able to cross 50th
Street by using the PHB signal,
which will help alert drivers to their
presence and provide for a safe
and efficient crossing. PHB signals
will continue to be considered at
other locations around the City.
City of Omaha
Public Works
Department
Traffic Engineering
WHAT TO DO AS A DRIVER
When approaching a Pedestrian Hybrid
Beacon (PHB) signal in a vehicle, the
signals will be dark when not in use.
However, if the yellow light begins flashing,
then begin to slow down and prepare to
stop. When the yellow light changes to a
steady indication, stop if it is safe to do so.
Once the PHB signal changes from steady
yellow to two solid red indications, stop and
remain stopped. When the two red lights
begin an alternating flash pattern, stop or
remain stopped until pedestrians have
finished crossing the street. If the crosswalk
is clear while the two red signals are still in
the alternating flash pattern, then drivers
may proceed with caution. The signal will
then return to its unlit condition when not in
use by pedestrians.
WHAT TO DO AS A PEDESTRIAN
As a pedestrian wishing to use a Pedestrian
Hybrid Beacon (PHB) signal, use the signal
as you would a normal traffic signal. Push
the button on the signal and watch the
pedestrian signal head across the street.
When it changes from a Don't Walk symbol
(orangesolid
hand) to a Walk
symbol (walking
person), begin
crossing the
r j street in the
crosswalk.
When the Walk
— symbol changes
to a Flashing Don't Walk with Countdown
Timer, continue crossing if you are already
in the crosswalk, but do not begin crossing if
you have not already done so.
HOW PEDESTRIAN HYBRID
BEACON SIGNALS WORK
OvPedestrian Hybrid Beacon
(PHB) signals use less
energy than standard traf-
fic signals, as PHB signals
are unlit when they are not
in use.
Ill DRIVERS
Will See...
Will Do...1rProceed0
with cau-tion.
Slow down,
prepare to
stop.
2
Apedes-
pedes;
Wzt.
FLASHING
activated
the system.
3
Mee
Stop if it is
safe to do
50.
Continue
to wait.
4
•
•A
STOP.
man is in
the cross-
walk.
Start cross-
lwhen
al vehicles
are
stopped.
5
•
®
FLASHING
•
STOP.
Proceed
with caution
if the cross-
walk is
clear.
Continue
crossing;
the signal
will count
down.
6
Proceed
with cau-
tion.
Pus
buttonont to
activate
the system.
®
OvPedestrian Hybrid Beacon
(PHB) signals use less
energy than standard traf-
fic signals, as PHB signals
are unlit when they are not
in use.
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Councilmembers
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
2020-2024 CIP Development Discussion
April 30, 2019
INTRODUCTION
Late March, Administration/Finance distributed baseline worksheets to Department Heads for the
2020-2024 CIP kick-off. Subsequent discussion centered on the 2020-2024 CIP development, the
need of other committees (Vehicle/Equipment Purchasing & Facility Management Committees)
and commissions (Parks and Recreation & Community Center Advisory) to start their work and
to work toward a "draft" proposed 2020-2024 CIP to present to the City Council.
DISCUSSION
Throughout the summer a significant amount of time will be spent on evaluating utility
infrastructure, transportation improvements, building maintenance, equipment and park and
recreation needs. Each of these items will be supported by a detailed fund balance analysis of
funding sources (based on various assumptions and estimates) that will be presented to the Council
for review at future workshops.
At this time, the Staff would like to have a brief discussion with the Council to determine
Council's priorities for a 2020-2024 CIP. It is anticipated that interactive reviews will be
done at future workshop meetings, but the focus during those reviews will be on new projects
and outstanding questions on previously proposed projects where staff may need ongoing
Council direction (such as State Aid Routes Reconstruction, Trial improvements & major
building/expansion proiects).
Attached is a spreadsheet identifying the current 2019 Capital Improvement Plan Projects
by Department and the progress on each project, also attached for reference is the
introduction section of the 2019-2023 CIP adopted by the Council last November.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is requested to review the attachments, receive
direction to staff on Council priorities for the 2020-2024 CIP.
nitted,
a brief presentation, and provide
CITY OF ANDOVER
2019 Capital Improvement Plan
Projects By Department- Use of Funds
Project/Equipment
Budget
Progress to Date -04/26/19
Building
Replacement - Small Extended Cab Pick Up #8
$ 35,000
completed
Community Center
ACC/YMCA Expansion
16,600,000
out for bid
Replacement- Camera/Security System
25,000
wailing for bid results
Upgrade Building Control System
50,000
wailing for bid results
Replacement - Skate Sharpener
8,000
defer until next year pending expansion
Replacement - Ice Arena Refrigeration & Dasher Board
500,000
wailing for bid results
Replacement- Concrete Floor Zamboni Room
20,000
wailing for bid results
LED Lighting Upgrade - Ice Arena
25,000
completed
Replacement - Field House Floor
275,000
wailing for bid results
LED Lighting Upgrade- Field House
25,000
completed
17,528,000
Elections
Replacement- Election Voting Booths
25,000
reviewing options
Emergency Management
Emergency Operations Center Improvement
7,500
ongoing
New- Emergency Sirens
55,000
in progress
62,500
Engineering
New Development Projects
165,000
in progress
Pedestrian Trail Maintenance
60,000
May to August
Pedestrian Trail Reconstruction
70,000
TBD
Pedestrian Curb Ramp Replacements
18,000
not bid yet- late summer construction
New Pedestrian Trail and Sidewalk Segments
367,500
not bid yet- late summer/fall construction
680,500
Facility Management
Annual Parking Lot Maintenance
35,000
summer
Public Works Relocation/Expansion
9,350,000
underconslruction
Building A- Seal Floor
25,000
deferred until 2020
Memorial- Veteran's Memorial
10,000
w/ PW vehicle maintenance facility
Replacement- Fire Alarm Panel & Smoke Heads CH
7,500
receiving bids
Replacement - Tube Heaters FS#2
25,000
receiving bids
Replacement - Oce Lighting CH
15,000
completed
Replacement- Public Works Roof
100,000
completed
Replacement- Exhaust Fans FS #1
6,500
receiving bids
Replacement- Make Up Air Unit FS#1
30,000
receiving bids
9,604,000
Fire
Replacement -Turnout Gear
22,000
ongoing
Park & Recreation - Operations
Replace/Repair Play Structures - Various Parks
50,000
Purple Park: May/June install
Park & Recreation - Projects
Annual Miscellaneous Projects
15,000
in progress
Irrigation Projects- Hills of Bunker West Park
40,000
completed this summer
55,000
Sanitary Sewer
Lit Station Improvements
1,015,000
out for bid; mid July late summer consUuclion
Stone Sewer
Storm Sewer Improvements
60,000
part of street reconstruction
Streets / Highways
Annual Street Seal Coat Project
260,000
Late July /August
Annual Street Crack Seal Project
260,000
May / June
Annual Pavement Markings
45,000
May - Sep
Annual Curb Replacement
54,000
not bid yet; late summer
Municipal State Aid Routes / New & Reconstruct
2,270,000
Starting in April
Annual Street Reconstruction
1,163,000
May - August
Gravel Road Improvement
20,000
Summer
New -Message Board
18,000
in progress
4,090,000
Water
Rehabilitation of Wells
50,000
reviewing well #3
Water Main Improvements
750,000
Area east of Crooked Lake- residents declined
New- Valve Maintenance Trailer
70,000
reviewing options
870,000
Grand Total
$ 34,097,000
C I T Y
,NDO
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator / Finance Director
SUBJECT: 2019 — 2023 Capital Improvement Plan
DATE: November 7, 2018
INTRODUCTION
On behalf of the City's Management Team, I am pleased to present the City of Andover's Capital
Improvement Plan for years 2019 through 2023. The City's management team and their respective staff
worked diligently to produce a document that was both practical, substantive in addressing needed capital
improvements and insightful regarding the underlying factors associated with the City's rapidly changing
suburban landscape.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GOALS
ACKNOWLEDGE AND COMMUNICATE
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PRIORITIES AND DYNAMICS
ENSURE APPROPRIATE RESPONSES
TO CHANGING INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS AND DEMANDS
DEVELOP A FINANCIAL ASSESSMENT OF CAPITAL RESOURCES
AVAILABLE TO MEET FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECT PLANNING NEEDS
INSTITUTE A STRATEGIC VISION
PREDICATED ON MAINTAINING A HIGH QUALITY SERVICE INFRASTRUCTURE CAPABLE OF
MEETING TIS, NEEDS OF OUR CITIZENS FOR TODAY AND TOMORROW
The purpose of the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is to identify, prioritize and address community
needs through careful long-term capital planning and balanced public investment in supporting physical
infrastructure. To ensure that this commitment is both meaningful and achievable, appropriate capital
improvement factors were given significant consideration in developing a CIP that addresses community
priorities over the next five (5) years. The CIP will also provide a planning foundation for future needs
assessments to ensure the City is appropriately responding to the critical infrastructure needs necessary for
sustainable future growth. The CIP represents a beginning in terms of producing a comprehensive planning
response to address changing capital needs by developing a project schedule that will lead to timely and
cost-effective project completions.
DISCUSSION
The 2019 - 2023 CIP has been prepared as a strategic planning tool to assist the City Council in identifying
proposed capital improvement projects over the next five years. With the inclusion of preliminary financing
sources, appropriate background information citing needs and projected cost estimates, this document will
provide Council with the needed information to begin the process for planning improvements that meet the
City's physical infrastructure needs. Consequently, the CIP serves as a flexible guide plan to properly
identify the critical components of the City's infrastructure, yet maintain flexibility in determining project
timeframes, project scope and possible funding sources. The 2019 - 2023 CIP continues the emphasis of
judiciously managing the City's limited resources by prudently planning for known and/or anticipated
future capital expenditures.
A critical step in the plan adoption process is the collaborative nature of plan review that involves the
leadership of the City Council, the input of appointed Commissions and staff, and most importantly,
affected residents of the community. Consequently, the strategic value of this plan lies in the
acknowledgement of future needs by the governing body and the effective communication of those needs
to the general public during project development stages. Likewise, the availability and preliminary
designation of fiscal resources to serve both current and future needs is critical to the achievement of plan
outcomes that meet with Council approval. Following the approval of the plan, feasibility studies are
performed, affected constituencies are notified to formally disseminate and receive public feedback on
proposed project plans. This process culminates with the City Council considering all relevant information
and making a final decision on whether to proceed with the proposed capital improvement.
The public process that supports the advancement of these projects from inception to completion is
engendered in the CIP project development and authorization schedule. Formalizing the steps in the CIP
project advancement process serves a number of purposes and ensures that the Council and public are kept
well informed regarding project purposes and desired outcomes, estimated project costs, funding sources,
progress and final status. It should be emphasized that projects will require approval in various stages of
project development by the City Council in accordance with approved policies.
The objectives of the 2019 - 2023 Capital Improvement Plan are to present a comprehensive capital
improvement program that communicates efforts:
➢ to ensure that community priorities are reflected in the capital investment plans of
each City department;
➢ to provide a consolidated financial picture of anticipated expenditures and outline
recommended funding strategies to underwrite anticipated capital improvements;
➢ to document and communicate capital improvement processes for City projects
that will ensure consistency, a full appreciation of both the costs and benefits of
proposed capital investments, and raises the level of public understanding
regarding the City's public improvement processes;
➢ to provide information on the fiscal impacts of capital investment plans on total
City finances; and
➢ to effectively plan for public improvements that support community needs in the
areas of private development infrastructure, transportation, public safety, parks
and recreation, utilities, and commercial/industrial growth through fiscally
responsible economic development initiatives.
Accordingly, this document attempts to recognize known or perceived capital improvement needs, but as
with any plan recognizes that social, economic and political considerations will by necessity determine final
project outcomes. The major categories of expenditures that are identified within the CIP include, but are
not limited to:
1. New Public Facilities Planning
2. Street Construction, Maintenance and Reconstruction
3. Utility Construction, Maintenance and Reconstruction
4. Construction, Maintenance and Upgrade of Parks, Playgrounds and Trails
5. Capital Improvements to Existing Facilities
6. Private development infrastructure
7. Capital equipment and vehicle planning needs (Equipment purchases to be determined through
normal budgetary process)
The City Council, consequently, accepts this document with the provision that capital improvement
planning is subject to the dynamics of community growth, political leadership and acknowledges that other
unanticipated needs may take precedence over planned projects.
RECOMMENDATION
The 2019 - 2023 Capital Improvement Plan is the product of collaborative planning efforts by City staff,
Park and Recreation Commission, Community Center Advisory Commission and the City Council. Projects
have been introduced based on 1) anticipated future growth trends articulated in the City's current
Comprehensive Plan, 2) the natural cycle of deterioration and decay evident in all physically constructed
and engineered improvements in the more established areas of the community and 3) capital deficiencies
or infrastructure issues brought to the City's attention through a variety of sources.
Capital expenditures identified within the CIP are the best estimates available, and once the CIP is adopted,
will be reviewed and confirmed through individual feasibility reports where appropriate. I am appreciative
of the commitment, good judgment and expertise that each department has contributed to the capital
improvement planning process.
Respectfully submitted,
� E \—
Jim Dickinson
City Administrator
CIP PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
PROCESS AUTHORIZATION SCHEDULE
The following process is a Council/staff guideline for authorizing public improvement projects. As this process is
controlled by State Statute and other influencing environmental factors, it is subject to change and should be
viewed as a guide to assist the Council and public in understanding the public improvement process used by City
staff. A separate Council meeting would facilitate each step in the process, and accomplishment of respective
activities. As a result, the process time frame is a significant factor affecting City staffs ability to properly manage
and complete approved Council ordered projects within budget and on time.
1. Council Approval of Annual CIP Projects by City Resolution will authorize the following outcomes:
a) Staff and/or Consultant preparation of project feasibility studies
b) Staff preparation of detailed financial review of project funding sources
c) Neighborhood Meeting may be held prior to Feasibility Study subject to need and type of project.
TIME FRAME: October -November of each preceding year.
2. Presentation of Feasibility Study
a) Feasibility Study Components:
1) Review of Project Engineering and Construction Estimates
2) Total Project Costs (All related project costs, i.e. land, soft costs)
3) Project Financial Plan/Fiscal Implications (Engineering/Finance)
4) Authorization to develop a Preliminary Assessment Roll, if any, for the Public Hearing. (Engineering)
• If Council accepts Feasibility Study, A Resolution "Accepting Feasibility Study and Setting Date for
Public Hearing on the Project" when appropriate (Engineering Department) would initiate the following:
1) Notices mailed to affected Residents per statute requirements no less than 10 days before Public
Hearing. (Engineering)
2) Public Hearing Notice is published. Two publications one week apart, with the second publication no
less than three days before the hearing. (Engineering/City Clerk)
TIME FRAME: February -March -April -May of current year.
3. Neighborhood Meeting— City staff will hold neighborhood project meetings, when appropriate, to review and
present Project Feasibility Studies, answer questions and meet with affected property owners. These meetings
will include a question and answer component designed specifically to bring awareness to the property owner,
obtain citizen input and produce an understanding of the purposes behind the City's attempts to construct
public improvements in the affected area.
TIME FRAME: Following the presentation of the Feasibility Study to Council, but prior to the holding of a
Public Hearing by Council.
4. Council holds a Public Hearing when appropriate for following purposes:
a) Presentation of Project (Engineering Department)
b) Presentation of Preliminary Special Assessment Rolls and Financing Implications (Engineering/Finance
Department)
c) Council to hear Affected Resident Input
d) Council determines whether to "order" the public improvement
• A Council Resolution is drafted "Ordering the Project and Authorizing Preparation of Plans and
Specifications" (Engineering Department). Council may ORDER THE IMPROVEMENT after the public
hearing is closed or at a subsequent Council Meeting within 6 months of the public hearing date.
(Statutory Requirement - Council Resolution ordering project must be approved on 4/5 Council vote if it
is Council initiatedproject with assessments).
• If Council decides to reject the project as presented, a Council vote should be taken to officially determine
the final status of the project.
TIME FRAME: April -May -June of current year
5. Plans and Specifications are presented to Council for approval. (Engineering Department)
a) A Council Resolution is drafted authorizing the following:
1) Accepting and Approving Project Plans and Specifications
2) Authorizing the Advertisement for Project Bids. Bids are developed and invitation to Bid is processed.
Bid opening date is no less than 3 weeks after publication. (Engineering)
3) Authorize staff to pursue an appropriate funding mechanism to underwrite project costs
TIME FRAME: May -June of each year
6. Council Acceptance of Project Bids and Awarding of Contracts would authorize the following outcomes:
a) A Council Resolution is drafted "Accepting Project Bids and Awarding Contracts" (Engineering)
b) Initiation of Project Construction and work (Engineering)
TIME FRAME: April -May -June -July of current year.
7. Project Completion
a) Council Acceptance of Project
b) Final Presentation and Review of Project Costs versus Project Budget by Finance Department.
c) If Special Assessments are financing a portion of the Project, A Council Resolution "Setting the Special
Assessment Hearing for Project #" is adopted at this same meeting. (Engineering/Finance)
TIME FRAME: Upon completion of project.
8. If Special Assessments would finance a portion of the projects costs, Council Holds a Special Assessment
Hearing to review the following:
a) Affected Property owners would be officially notified per statute no less than two weeks prior to Special
Assessment Hearing. (Clerk/Engineering)
b) Public Notice is published no less than two weeks prior to Special Hearing per statute (Clerk/Engineering)
c) Staff prepares a proposed roll and Council Approves Final Assessment Roll (Engineering/Finance)
d) Council consideration of Assessment Appeals and Requested Deferrals filed prior to hearing or during
the hearing.
e) Meets M.S. Chapter 429 statutory requirements
• A Council Resolution is drafted "Adopting Final Special Assessment Roll"(Engineering), and is adopted
at this meeting.
TIME FRAME: October/November of current year depending on finalization of project and status of
completion.
CITY OF ANDOVER
2019 CIP Expenditures By Department
Parks - Prof. Building Eme 9M mt
Engineedn 0.16% 0.10% 0.18%
Water Fire
g� 2.56% 0.06%
Sanitary Sewer Elections Streets/Highways
2.98°k '07% 12.01%
Comm Ctr
51.48%
Facility Mgmt.
28.21%
Storm Sewer
0.18%
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018 Adopted
CITY OF ANDOVER
2019 CIP Expenditures By Year
$- $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000 $35,000,000 $40,000,000
C
City of Andover, MN
Capital Plan
2019 thru 2023
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY
Department 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total
Building
35,000
35,000
Central Equipment
45,000
45,000
Community Center
17,528,000
159,000
255,000
238,000
1,510,000
19,690,000
Elections
25,000
25,000
Emergency Management
62,500
65,000
50,000
40,000
40,000
257,500
Engineering
680,500
687,000
1,567,000
774,000
1,128,000
4,836,500
Facility Management
9,604,000
320,000
64,000
50,000
332,000
10,370,000
Finance
225,000
225,000
Fire
22,000
669,000
270,000
646,000
71,000
1,678,000
Park&Rec - Operations
50,000
395,000
163,000
280,000
110,000
998,000
Park & Rec-Projects
55,000
635,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
735,000
Sanitary Sewer
1,015,000
1,015,000
Storm Sewer
60,000
62,000
65,000
318,000
70,000
575,000
Streets/Highways
4,090,000
3,266,000
2,927,500
4,943,000
4,378,000
19,604,500
Water
870,000
1,015,300
1,615,000
3,355,000
6,855,300
TOTAL 34,097,000
7,318,300
7,216,500
7,304,000
11,009,000
66,944,800
7
City of Andover, MN
Capital Plan
2019 thru 2023
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
Source 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total
Assessments
1,291,500
406,000
362,000
648,000
350,000
3,057,500
Capital Equipment Reserve
210,500
651,000
368,000
136,000
158,000
1,523,500
Comm Ctr Operations
58,000
148,000
240,000
238,000
1,510,000
2,194,000
Construction Seal Coat Fund
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
80,000
Equipment Bond
1,255,000
628,500
1,385,000
440,000
3,708,500
Facility Maintenance Reserve
155,000
125,000
25,000
260,000
565,000
G.O. Bond
26,820,000
23,000
750,000
27,593,000
General Fund
171,000
421,000
134,000
185,000
185,000
1,096,000
Grant
193,550
900,000
1,093,550
Municipal State Aid Funds
2,109,500
677,500
550,000
947,000
900,000
5,184,000
Park Dedication Funds
131,000
305,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
481,000
Road & Bridge Funds
1,577,000
1,895,500
2,057,000
2,491,000
2,034,000
10,054,500
Sanitary Sewer Fund
5,100
5,100
Sewer Trunk Fund
1,045,000
125,000
125,000
125,000
130,000
1,550,000
Storm Sewer Fund
60,000
67,100
65,000
68,000
70,000
330,100
Trail Funds
97,950
120,000
981,000
238,000
622,000
2,058,950
Water Fund
120,000
30,100
1,255,000
55,000
1,460,100
Water Revenue Bonds
3,300,000
3,300,000
Water Trunk Fund
45,000
1,050,000
395,000
60,000
60,000
1,610,000
GRAND TOTAL 34,097,000 7,318,300 7,216,500 7,304,000 11,009,000 66,944,800
8
City of Andover, MN
Capital Plan
2019 thru 2023
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total
Building
Replacement- Small Extended Cab Pick Up #8 19-42300-01 1 35,000 35,000
Capital Equipment Reserve 35,000 35,000
Building Total
Central Equipment
Replacement - Service Truck 4371
20-48800-01
Capital Equipment Reserve
Central Equipment Total
Community Center
ACCNMCA Expansion
19-44000-01
G.O. Bond
Replacement- CamemlSecunly System
19-44000-02
G.O. Bond
Upgrade Building Control System
19-44000-02
G.O. Bond
Replacement - Skate Sharpener
19-44200-01
Comm Ctr Operations
Replacement -Ice Arena Refrigeration & Dasher Board
19-44300-01
G.O. Bond
Replacement- Concrete Floor Zamboni Room
19-44300-0£
G.O. Bond
LED Lighting Upgrade - Ice Arena
19-44300-02
Comm Ctr Opuations
Replacement- Field House Floor
19-44400-01
G.O. Bond
LED Lighting Upgrade- Field House
19-44400-0,
Comm Ctr Operations
Replacement - Floor Scrubber
20-44000-01
Comm Ctr Operations
Replacement - Carpeting Entryway
2044000-0,
Comm Ctr Operations
Replacement - Lobby Furniture
2044000-0<
G.O. Bond
Repaint Field House Ceiling
2044200-01
Comm Ctr Operations
Refacing Rink Boards
20-44300-01
Comm Ctr Operations
Replacement- Zamboni Battery Pack
20-44300-0:
Comm Ctr Operations
Replacement - Scissor Lift
21-44000-0'
Equipment Bond
35,000 35,000
2 45,000 45,000
45,000 45,000
45,000 45,000
2 16,600,000
16,600,000
1 25,000
25,000
1 50,000
50,000
1 8,000
8,000
1 500,000
500,000
1 20,000
20,000
1 25,000
25,000
1 275,000
275,000
1 25,000
25,000
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
15,000
15,000
6,000
6,000
23,000
23,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
16,600,000
16600,000
25,000
25,000
50,000
50,000
8,000
8,000
500,000
500,000
20,000
20,000
25,000
25,000
275,000
275,000
25,000
24000
15,000
15,000
6,000
6,000
23,000
23,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
Department Project# Priority 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total
Replacement- All Community Center Doom
21A4000-02 1
75,000
159,000
255,000
75,000
Comm Ctr Operations
19,690,000
75,000
75,000
Replacement- Kaivac Cleaning System
21-44000-03 1
10,000
Replacement- Election Voting Booths
10,000
Comm Ctr Operations
10,000
10,000
Exterior Caulking
21-44000-04 1
50,000
50,000
Comm Ctr Operations
25,000
50,000
25,000
50,000
Replacement- Zamboni Room Water Heater
21-44300-01 1
30,000
25,000
Emergency Management
30,000
Comm Ctr Operations
30,000
30,000
Replacement - Heat Exchangers-Munters Unit
21-44300-02 1
15,000
10,000
10,000
15,000
Comm Ctr Operations
27,500
15,000
7,500
15,000
Replacement- Evaporative Condenser
21-44300-03 1
60,000
27,500
New- Emergency Siren Additions
60,000
Comm Ctr Operations
55,000
60,000
60,000
Replacement-SinkslFatures
22-44000-01 1
55,000
12,000
12,000
Comm Ctr Operations
110,000
Replacement- Emergency Sirens
12,000
11,000
Concrete Floor Sealant
22-44000-02 1
40,000
36,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
36,000
Comm Ctr Operations
40,000
36,000
40,000
36,000
Replacement-Zamboni
22-44300-01 1
62,500
180,000
50,000
180,000
Comm Ctr Operations
257,500
Engineering
180,000
180,000
Replacement -Electric Edger
22-44300-02 1
10,000
New Development Projects
10,000
Comm Ctr Operations
175,000
180,000
10,000
190,000
10,000
Carpet -Office/Fieldhouse Foyer
23-04000-01 1
120,000
125,000
15,000
15,000
Comm Ctr Operations
625,000
Water Trunk Fund
15,000
15,000
Replacement - Roof
23-44000-02 1
60,000
270,000
1,300,000
1,300,000
Comm Ctr Operations
63,000
66,000
69,000
1,300,000
1,300,000
Repaint Ice Arena ceiling
23-44300-01 1
60,000
63,000
195,000
195,000
Comm Ctr Operations
330,000
Pedestrian/Park Trail Reconstruction
1941600-03 1
195,000
195,000
Community Center Total
17,528,000
159,000
255,000
238,000
1,510,000
19,690,000
Elections
Replacement- Election Voting Booths
19-41310-01 1
25,000
25,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
25,000
25,000
Elections Total
25,000
25,000
Emergency Management
Emergency Operations Center Improvement
19-42400-01 1
7,500
10,000
10,000
27,500
Capital Equipment Reserve
7,500
10,000
10,000
27,500
New- Emergency Siren Additions
19-02400-02 1
55,000
55,000
110,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
55,000
55,000
110,000
Replacement- Emergency Sirens
21-42400-01 1
40,000
40,000
40,000
120,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
40,000
40,000
40,000
120,000
Emergency Management Total
62,500
65,000
50,000
40,000
40,000
257,500
Engineering
New Development Projects
19-41600-01 1
165,000
175,000
180,000
185,000
190,000
895,000
Sewer Trunk Fund
120,000
125,000
125,000
125,000
130,000
625,000
Water Trunk Fund
45,000
50,000
55,000
60,000
60,000
270,000
Pedestrian Trail Maintenance
19-41600-02 1
60,000
63,000
66,000
69,000
72,000
330,000
Road B Bridge Funds
60,000
63,000
66,000
69,000
72,000
330,000
Pedestrian/Park Trail Reconstruction
1941600-03 1
70,000
270,000
320,000
210,000
220,000
1,090,000
General Fund
70,000
270,000
50,000
50,000
440,000
Road 6 Bridge Funds
320,000
160,000
170,000
650,000
Pedestrian Curb Ramp Replacements
19-41600-04 1
18,000
19,000
20,000
22,000
24,000
103,000
10
Department Project# Priority 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total
Road& Bridge Funds
18,000
19,000
20,000
22,000
24,000
103,000
New Pedestrian Trail and Sidewalk Segments
19-41600-05
1 367,500
681,000
238,000
622,000
1,908,500
Grant
35,000
193,550
39,000 40,000 42,000
193,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
193,550
Park Dedication Funds
37,000
76,000
193,000
Public Works Relocation / Expansion
19-01900-02
1
76,000
Trail Funds
97,950
G.O. Bond
681,000
238,000
622,000
1,638,950
Railroad Underpass Trail
20-41600-01
1
120,000
300,000
25,000
420,000
Trail Fun ds
Capital Equipment Reserve
120,000
300,000
30,000
420,000
Replacement - Pick Up Truck #6
20-41600-02
2
40,000
10,000
40,000
Equipment Bond
10,000
40,000
10,000
Replacement- Fire Alan Panel & Smoke Head CH
40,000
Replacement -3/4 Ton Truck#12
22-41600-01
2
7,500
50,000
50,000
Equipment Bond
7,500
Replacement -Tube Heaters FS#2
50,000
1
50,000
Engineering Total
680,500
687,000
1,5672000 774,000 121282000
4,836,500
Facility Management
Annual Packing Lot Maintenance
19-41900-01
1
35,000
37,000
39,000 40,000 42,000
193,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
35,000
37,000
39,000 40,000 42,000
193,000
Public Works Relocation / Expansion
19-01900-02
1
9,350,000
9,350,000
G.O. Bond
9,350,000
9,350,000
Building A - Seal Floor
1941900-03
1
25,000
30,000
55,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
25,000
30,000
55,000
Memorial - Veterans Memorial
19-41900-04
1
10,000
10,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
10,000
10,000
Replacement- Fire Alan Panel & Smoke Head CH
19-41900-05
1
7,500
7,500
General Fund
7,500
7,500
Replacement -Tube Heaters FS#2
19-41900-06
1
25,000
25,000
Facility Maintenance Reserve
25,000
25,000
Replacement- City Hall Office Lighting
19-41900-07
2
15,000
15,000
General Fund
15,000
15,000
Replacement- Public Works Roof
19-41900-08
1
100,000
100,000
Facility Maintenance Reserve
100,000
1001000
Replacement - Exhaust Fans FS #1
19-41900-09
1
6,500
6,500
General Fund
6,500
6,500
Replacement- Make Up Air Unit FS #1
19-41900-10
1
30,000
30,000
Facility Maintenance Reserve
30,000
30,000
Surface Seal all Brick Structures
2041900-01
1
85,000
85,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
48,000
48,000
Comm Ctr Operations
12,000
12,000
Wate•Fund
25,000
25,000
Replacement - Carpet/Tile
20-41900-02
1
10,000
10,000
20,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
10,000
10,000
20,000
Replacement -Tube Heaters PW
20-41900-03
1
80,000
80,000
Facility Maintenance Reserve
80,000
80,000
Replacement - Air Handling Unit/Condenser FS #1
20-41900-04
1
6,000
6,000
General Fund
6,000
6,000
Replacement - Fumace/Condenser PW
20-41900-05
2
6,000
6,000
General Fund
6,000
6,000
Replacement - Furnace/Condenser Coil PW
2041900-06
2
6,000
6,000
General Fund
6,000
6,000
Replacement- Roof Top Package Unit PW
20-41900-07
2
45,000
45,000
Facility Maintenance Reserve
45,000
45,000
New - Diesel Exhaust Capturing System FS #1
20-41900-08
1
45,000
45,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
45,000
45,000
Replacement - Tube Heaters FS #1
21-41900-01
1
25,000
25,000
Facility Maintenance Reserve
25,000
25,000
11
Department
Project#
Priority 2019
2020 2021
2022 2023
Total
Replacement- Emergency Generator FS#1
23-41900-01
1
Replacement -Engine 21#4884
50,000
50,000
Facility Maintenance Reserve
Replacement -(2) SCBA Compressors Sta. 2 and 3
20-42200-02
Equipment Bond
50,000
50,000
Replacement- Emergency Generator FS#2
23-41900-02
1
New - Bullex Fire Extinguisher Prop
35,000
35,000
Facility Maintenance Reserve
Replacement- Automated External Defibrillator
20-42200-0.�
Capital Equipment Reserve
35,000
35,000
Replacement- Emergency Generator FS #3
23-41900-03
1
Replacement -1999 GMC Sonoma Track (U-10) #4810
50,000
50,000
Facility Maintenance Reserve
Replacement- Thermal Imaging Cameras
2142200-03
Equipment Bond
50,000
50,000
Replacement- Make Up An Unit/Exhaust Fan PW
23-41900-04
1
Replacement -4818 Rescue #31
125,000
125,000
Facility Maintenance Reserve
10,000
1 15,000
18,000
125,000
125,000
Facility Management Total
15,000
9,604,000
320,000 64,000
50,000 332,000
10,370,000
Finance
45,000
45,000
Financial/ Payroll System Upgrade/Replacement
21-41400-01
1
225,000
3
225,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
45,000
225,000
45,000
225,000
Finance Total
24,000
25,000
25,000
Fire
Replacement - Turnout Gear
19-42200-01
General Fund
25,000
Replacement -Engine 21#4884
20-42200-01
Equipment Bond
35,000
Replacement -(2) SCBA Compressors Sta. 2 and 3
20-42200-02
Equipment Bond
35,000
Replacement -800 MHz radios
20-42200-03
Capital Equipment Reserve
1 65,000
New - Bullex Fire Extinguisher Prop
20-42200-04
Capital Equipment Reserve
130,000
Replacement- Automated External Defibrillator
20-42200-0.�
Capital Equipment Reserve
Replacement- Grass Utility Vehicle (UTV) #4813
21-42200-01
Equipment Bond
46,000
Replacement -1999 GMC Sonoma Track (U-10) #4810
21-42200-02
Equipment Bond
46,000
Replacement- Thermal Imaging Cameras
2142200-03
Equipment Bond
2 10,000
Replacement -Engine 31#4800
2242200-01
Equipment Bond
10,000
Replacement -4818 Rescue #31
22-42200-02
Equipment Bond
Fire Total
24,000
25,000
25,000
Park & Rec - Operations
Replace/Repair Play Structures - Various Parks
19-45000-01
General Fund
25,000
Replace/Repair Major Park Projects - Various Parks
1945000-02
General Fund
35,000
Replacement - Water Tanker 4161
2045000-01
Equipment Bond
35,000
New - Large Capacity Mower
20-45000-02
Equipment Bond
1 65,000
Replacement -Cushman Field Dresser #547
21-45000-01
Equipment Bond
130,000
Replacement -Trailer #T-555
21-45000-02
225,000 225,000
1 22,000 23,000
24,000
25,000
25,000
119,000
22,000 23,000
24,000
25,000
25,000
119,000
1 510,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
510,000
510,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
510,000
1 65,000
65,000
130,000
65,000
65,000
130,000
2 46,000
46,000
46,000
46,000
184,000
46,000
46,000
46,000
46,000
184,000
2 10,000
27,000
10,000
10,000
27,000
10,000
1 15,000
18,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
1
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
3
45,000
45,000
45,000
45,000
1
45,000
-
45,000
45,000
45,000
1
475,000
475,000
475,000
475,000
1
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
22,000 669,000
270,000
646,000
71,000
1,678,000
1 50,000 75,000
75,000
75,000
75,000
350,000
50,000 75,000
75,000
75,000
75,000
350,000
1 35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
140,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
140,000
1 175,000
175,000
175,000
175,000
1 110,000
110,000
110,000
110,000
1
27,000
27,000
27,000
27,000
1
18,000
18,000
12
Department
Project#
Priority
2010
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total
Equipment Bond
18,000
18,000
New- Buffalo Turbine Tow-Behind Blower
21-45000-03
1
8,000
8,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
8,000
8,000
Replacement- Large Capacity Mower #11-582
22-45000-01
1
120,000
120,000
Equipment Bond
120,000
120,000
Replacement-JD Tractor#515
22-45000-02
1
50,000
50,000
Equipment Bond
50,000
50,000
Park & Ree - Operations Total
50,000
395,000
163,000
280,000
110,000
998,000
Park & Rec - Projects
Annual Miscellaneous Park Projects
19-45001-01
1
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
75,000
Park Dedication Funds
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
75,000
Irrigation Projects- Hills of Bunker West Park
19-45001-02
1
40,000
40,000
Park Dedication Funds
40,000
40,000
Pine Hills North - Phase II
20-45001-01
1
400,000
400,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
280,000
280,000
Park Dedication Funds
120,000
120,000
Dalske Preserve Boardwalk
20-45001-02
1
50,000
50,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
50,000
50,000
Prairie Knoll North Parking Lot Impr
20-45001-03
1
170,000
170,000
Park Dedication Funds
170,000
170,000
Park&Rec - Projects Total
55,000
635,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
735,000
Sanitary Sewer
Lift Station Improvements
1948200-01
1
1,015,000
1,015,000
Assessments
90,090
90,000
Sewer Trunk Fund
925,000
925,000
Sanitary Sewer Total
1,015,000
1,015,000
Storm Sewer
Storm Sewer Improvements
19-48300-01
1
60,000
62,000
65,000
68,000
70,000
325,000
Storm Sewer Fund
60,000
62,000
65,000
68,000
70,000
325,000
Replacement- Elgin Street Sweeper 4169
22-48300-01
1
250,000
250,000
Equipment Bond
250,000
250,000
Storm Sewer Total
60,000
62,000
65,000
316,000
70,000
575,000
Streets / Highways
Annual Street Seal Coat Project
19-43100-01
1
260,000
270,000
280,000
290,000
300,000
1,400,000
Road B Bridge Funds
260,000
270,000
280,000
290,000
300,000
1,400,000
Annual Street Crack Seal Project
19-43100-02
1
260,000
270,000
280,000
290,000
300,000
1,400,000
Construction Seal Coat Fund
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
80,000
Road &Bridge Funds
248,000
256,000
264,000
272,000
280,000
1,320,000
Annual Pavement Markings
1943100-03
1
45,000
47,000
49,000
51,000
53,000
245,000
Road &Bridge Funds
45,000
47,000
49,000
51,000
53,000
245,000
Annual Curb Replacement
1943100-04
1
54,000
56,000
58,000
60,000
62,000
290,000
Road& Bridge Funds
59000
56,000
58,000
60,000
62,000
290,000
Municipal State Aid Routes / New &Reconstruct
19-43100-05
1
2,270,000
410,000
290,000
1,080,000
4,050,000
Assessments
160,500
17,500
15,000
133,000
326,000
Municipal State Aid Funds
2,109,500
392,500
275,000
947,000
3,724,000
Annual Street Reconstruction
19-43100-06
1
1,163,000
1,202,000
1,306,000
1,560,000
1,400,000
6,631,000
Assessments
291,000
301,000
327,000
390,000
350,000
1,659,000
Road& Bridge Funds
872,000
901,000
979,000
1,170,000
1,050,000
4,972,000
13
Department Project At Priority 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total
Intersection Upgrades
19-43100-07
1
3,266,000
285,000
275,000
19,604,500
1,800,000
2,360,000
Grant
Rehabilitation of Wells
19-48100-01
900,000
900,000
Municipal State Aid Funds
55,000
160,000
Water Fund
285,000
275,000
900,000
1,460,000
Gravel Road Improvements
19-43100-08
1
20,000
21,000
21,000
22,000
23,000
107,000
Road& Bridge Funds
750,000
20,000
21,000
21,000
22,000
23,000
107,000
New - Sign Message Board
19-43100-09
1
18,000
New- Valve Maintenance Trailer
1948100-03
1 70,000
18,000
Capital Equipment Reserve
70,000
Water Fund
18,000
70,000
18,000
Replacement- Front End Loader#124
20-43100-01
1
1,000,000
275,000
1,000,000
Water Trunk Fund
275,000
Equipment Bond
1,000,000
275,000
infraMap Software System
20-48100.02
1
275,000
Replacement - One Ton Truck w/Plow #133
20-43100-02
1
Sanitary Sewer Fund
80,000
5,100
80,000
Equipment Bond
Stomr Sewer Fund
80,000
5,100
80,000
Street Overlays
2043100-03
1
350,000
5,100
500,000
21-48100-01
850,000
Assessments
1,200,000
1,200,000
87,500
125,000
212,500
Road& Bridge Funds
1,200,000
Construct Clearvall at WTP
23-48100-01
262,500
375,000
3,300,000
637,500
New - Dump Track w/ snow removal
2143100-01
1
240,000
3,300,000
Water Total
240,000
Equipment Bond
1,015,300
1,615,000
3,355,000
6,855,300
240,000
240,000
New - 3/4 Ton Truck wl Snow removal
21-43100-02
1
60,000
60,000
Equipment Bond
60,000
60,000
New - Stump Grinder
21-43100-03
1
8,500
8,500
Equipment Bond
8,500
8,500
Replacement - Bobcat 5185#120
21-43100-04
1
60,000
60,000
Equipment Bond
60,000
60,000
Replacement - Dump Truck w/ Snow removal#198
22-43100-01
1
240,000
240,000
Equipment Bond
240,000
240,000
Replacement -Backhoe Loader#80
22-43100-02
1
100,000
100,000
Equipment Bond
100,000
100,000
Pedestrian Tunnel Under Crosstown Blvd.
2243100-03
1
750,000
750,000
G.O. Bond
750,000
750,000
Replacement - Dump Truck w/ Snow removal #200
2343100-01
1
240,000
240,000
Equipment Bontl
240,000
240,000
Replacement- Aerial bucket truck #00-139
23-43100-02
1
200,000
200,000
Equipment Bond
200,000
200,000
Streets / Highways Total
4,090,000
3,266,000
2,927,500 4,943,000
4,378,000
19,604,500
Water
Rehabilitation of Wells
19-48100-01
1 50,000
55,000
55,000
160,000
Water Fund
50,000
55,000
55,000
160,000
Water Main Improvements
19-48100-02
1 750,000
360,000
1,110,000
Assessments
750,000
20,000
770,000
Water Trunk Fund
340,000
340,000
New- Valve Maintenance Trailer
1948100-03
1 70,000
70,000
Water Fund
70,000
70,000
Recondition& Paint Water Tower#2
2048100-01
1
1,000,000
1,000,000
Water Trunk Fund
1,000,000
1,000,000
infraMap Software System
20-48100.02
1
15,300
15,300
Sanitary Sewer Fund
5,100
5,100
Stomr Sewer Fund
5,100
5,100
Water Fund
5,100
5,100
Water Meter Reading System AMIIAMR
21-48100-01
2
1,200,000
1,200,000
Water Fund
1,200,000
1,200,000
Construct Clearvall at WTP
23-48100-01
1
3,300,000
3,300,000
Water Revenue Bonds
3,300,000
3,300,000
Water Total
870,000
1,015,300
1,615,000
3,355,000
6,855,300
14
Department Project# Priority 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total
GRAND TOTAL 34,097,000 7,318,300 7,216,500 7,304,000 11,009,000 66,944,800
16
TT Y TO F
)OVE.
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Councilmembers
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
2020 Budget Development Discussion
April 30, 2019
0
INTRODUCTION
City Administration is starting to focus on the 2020 Annual Operating Budget Development
process and is looking for City Council direction as the preparation of the 2020 Annual Operating
Budget proceeds.
City Administration will review briefly with the Council the bold italics items at the meeting.
DISCUSSION
The following are the 2020 Budget Development guidelines adopted at the April 2nd City Council
meeting:
1) A commitment to a City Tax Capacity Rate to meet the needs of the organization and
positioning the City for long-term competitiveness using sustainable revenue sources and
operational efficiencies.
Note: Preliminary Anoka County Assessor taxable market value figures for the City of
Andover are reflecting close to a 9% increase in total taxable market value.
2) A fiscal goal that works toward establishing the General Fund balance for working capital at
no less than 45% of planned 2020 General Fund expenditures and the preservation of
emergency fund balances (snow emergency, public safety, facility management & information
technology) through targeting revenue enhancements or expenditure limitations in the 2019
adopted General Fund budget.
Note: With property tax revenues making up close to 80% of the total General Fund
revenues cash flow designations approaching 50% are appropriate and recommended by the
City's auditor. The 2019 budget development exceeded this guideline for cash flow, also
Emergency Fund Balances (approximately 3% of planned General Fund expenditures) are
in place to stabilize a situation, not be a complete solution. Staff will review with the
Council a final 2018 General Fund Fund Balance Analysis at the meeting.
3) A commitment to limit the 2020 debt levy to no more than 25% of the gross tax levy and a
commitment to a detailed city debt analysis to take advantage of alternative financing
consistent with the City's adopted Debt Policy.
Note: The adopted 2019 debt levy was 16.14% of the gross tax levy, the 25% guideline for
2020 provides reasonable margin to accommodate additional long-term debt.
Please keep in mind thatfor the 2017 & 2018 budgets, $500,000 & $525,000 respectively of
existing debt levy through 2016 was temporarily moved to a Capital Levy to fund planned
equipment purchases (rather than issuing debt), that decreased the debt levy percentage of
the gross tax levy significantly.
4) A comprehensive review of the condition of capital equipment to ensure that the most cost-
effective replacement schedule is followed. Equipment will be replaced based on a cost benefit
analysis rather than a year -based replacement schedule.
Note: The City Vehicle Purchasing Committee
will make recommendations to the City Cot
Improvement Plan (CIP) development process.
future CIP discussions.
is currently performing this analysis and
ncil as part of the 2020-2024 Capital
This will be covered in more detail with
5) The use of long-term financial models that identify anticipated trends in community growth
and financial resources that will help designate appropriate capital resources for future City
needs. The financial models will be used in the budget planning process to ensure that key
short-term fiscal targets are in line with long-term fiscal projections.
Note: The City continually maintains various financial models to determine the long-term
impacts of present-day expenditures and financing decisions. Fiscal assumptions are based
upon a set of financial data including growth factors, tax capacity valuations, per capita
spending and debt ratios.
6) Continued commitment to strategic planning targeted toward meeting immediate and long-
term operational, staffing, infrastructure and facility needs.
Note: A Council Community Vision and Organizational Goals and Values document will
be updated by the Council over the next few months. Administration will assure that
direction provided in that updated document is integrated into various department work
plans and budgets.
7) A management philosophy that actively supports the funding and implementation of Council
policies and goals, and a commitment to being responsive to changing community conditions,
concerns, and demands, and to do so in a cost-effective manner.
Note: Special attention is given to fiscal values, commercial & residential development or
redevelopment, collaboration opportunities, service delivery, livability and image of the
community.
Staffing:
Administration is expecting new staffing requests from various Departments for the 2020
budget. Deadline for submission of those requests will be July Ise
There are some anticipated retirements and staff vacancies within the next few years; in response
Administration/Human Resources will continue to focus on succession planning, utilization of
internship opportunities, continued cross -training of staff, and/or possible realignment of
resources.
Personnel Related Implications:
To date the following are the other projected issues facing personnel related expenses:
1. Human Resources will review all position -based salaries and the associated benefit
package to determine if the total package is competitive with other government entities.,
Based on the research in late 2019, there are a few positions where salaries are lagging the
market. The 2019 budget is carrying budget dollars to address those positions in 2019.
Pay steps for eligible employees will be included in a 2020 budget proposal. A cost of
living adjustment (CO") for non -bargaining emplovees will be evaluated. The current
Public Works Union contract expires December 31, 2019, negotiations on the next
Public Works Union contract will start on May lsr
2. A midyear review of the employee health plan for the 2020 Budget will be conducted with
our broker in late June or early July.
During the 2019 Budget development process, unfortunately, the best and only rate came
from our current provider HealthPartners with a 29% rate increase to maintain the
current plan. Most insurance companies were not competitive or just elected not to bid
based on the group's experience.
AdministratiomHuman Resources continued to work with our broker to solicit other
options from HealthPartners and was able to secure a proposal on an additional option
similar to the current plan except with a higher deductible with a 17% rate increase.
Based on the continued negotiations and discussions with members of the Employee
Benefit Committee Administration recommended to the City Council that the City offer
the employees the choice of two open access high deductible plans, one with a $5,000
family plan deductible and $2,500 single plan deductible (the current plan model) the
other with a $7.000 family plan deductible and $3,500 single plan deductible (new
offering). As part of the employee benefit program, the City will pay for 100% of the
lower cost single health insurance premium and 76% of the lower cost family health
insurance premium.
These plans are accompanied with a health spending account (HSA), that was originally
implemented in 2006. The City does contribute annually to an employee's HSA to assist
with the high deductible out of pocket costs.
Contractual Departments:
1. The City Attorney 2019 contract reflected a 2% increase over the 2018 contract. There
have been no discussions to date for 2020.
2. The 2019 City of Andover Law Enforcement expenditure budget is $3,183,610 which is
offset by a Police State Aid revenue budget of $135,200 and School Liaison revenue budget
of $99,350 reflecting a net tax levy impact of $2,949,060.
The 2019 Sheriff's contract provides for:
a. 80 hours per day of patrol service
b. 6 hours per day of service provided by a Community Service Officer
c. School Liaison Officers in the middle school and high school
d. 2 Patrol Investigators
e. 50% of the Crime Watch Program's coordinator position.
Per contract, the Sheriff always provides the required number of deputies for all hours
contracted by the City. If the Sheriff's Office has a deputy vacancy or a deputy is injured
etc., they still provide the City with a deputy at straight time even though they may have to
fill those hours with overtime which at times may cost the Sheriff s Department additional
but is not billable per the contract.
Staff has had initial discussions with the Anoka County Sheriff for a 2020 contract, and
the Anoka County Sheriffs Office will be scheduled to be before the City Council at a
future workshop meeting.
Council Memberships and Donations/Contributions:
The following memberships/contributions are currently included in the 2019 Budget:
• North Metro Mayors Association
• Metro Cities
• Mediation Services
■ YMCA — Water Safety Program
• Alexandra House
■ Youth First (Program Funding)
■ NW Anoka Co. Community Consortium - JPA
• Teen Center Funding (YMCA)
■ Family of Promise
■ Lee Carlson Central Center for Family Resources
• Senior High Parties
• Stepping Stone
• Hope for Youth
$15,150
(GF)
$ 9,518
(GF)
$ 3,366
(GF)
$ 8,500
(GF)
$18,328
($15,328 GF
$14,000
($12,000 GF
$10,000
(GF)
$24,500
($8,100 GF
$ 3,000
(CG)
$ 1,500
(GF)
$ 1,000
(CG)
$ 900
(CG)
$ 1,000
(CG)
& $3,000 CG)
& $2,000 CG)
& $16,400 CG)
Some are funded via the General Fund (GF), and those that qualify for charitable gambling
funding are done through the Charitable Gambling (CG) Special Revenue Fund.
Council direction will be sought on the memberships/contributions for 2020.
Capital Projects Levy:
Capital Projects Levy — The 2019 Capital Projects Levy Budget specifically designates $2,001,788
of the general tax levy to capital projects and equipment needs relating to Capital Project Outlay
($275,000), Road and Bridge ($1,254,788), Pedestrian Trail Maintenance ($102,000), Park
Projects ($15,000) and Facility Maintenance Reserve ($355,000). Specific designation of the tax
levy to anticipated City needs and priorities for transportation and trail maintenance, park projects
and equipment outlays allows the City to strategically allocate its resources and raise the public's
awareness of City spending priorities. The Road and Bridge levy is evaluated annually and along
with Capital Outlay, Pedestrian Trail Maintenance, Parks Projects and Facility Maintenance levies
increased/decreased according to the City Council budget guidelines.
• Road and Bridge
An adjustment was made to the Road & Bridge funding formula in 2014, primarily to stop
the continual decrease in the levy that has been happening over the past few years due to
decreases in the Anoka County Assessor taxable market value figures for the City of
Andover. Based on Council discussion, consensus was to stop the decline in road funding
and evaluate annually through the adopted City Council Budget Development Guidelines.
It should be noted that in 2014, Local Government Aid (LGA) in the amount of $74,655
was used to help fund the Road & Bridge Fund. That State of Minnesota funding has largely
gone away, down to $0.00 in 2017 and 2018. Future increases in LGA or even the presence
of LGA for the City of Andover based on the current State formula are remote.
The 2018 City of Andover Road & Bridge levy was $1,169,014. That was a 4.74%
increase over 2017. The 2019 budget contained a 7.34% increase ($85,774) to
$1,254,788 for the 2019 budget.
Administration will likely be proposing an increase again for 2020.
• Pedestrian Trail Maintenance
The 2018 City ofAndover Pedestrian Trail Maintenance levy was increased significantly
from $63,075 in 2017 to $100,000 for 2018, a 58.54% increase in funding. The 2019
budget included a 2% increase ($2,000) to $102,000.
Administration will likely be proposing a slight % increase again for 2020.
• Park Improvements
This levy is an annual appropriation to be used to underwrite park improvement projects
as recommended by the Park and Recreation Commission and approved by the City
Council. This funding is intended to be a supplemental source of capital funding for park
projects that is separately identified in the City's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan.
The 2015 levy was $61,500, but only $15,000 was leviedfor 2016. $46,500 of the previous
levy was re -assigned to the General Fund to focus on Park's maintenance/replacement
items. In addition to the re -assigned funds an additional $43,500 of General Fund levy
was assigned to Parks Repair/Replacement itemsfor a total levy of $90,000 in 2016, and
that continued for 2017. The 2018 General Fund levy assigned to Parks
Repair/Replacement items levy was increased to $100,000 and continued at that level for
2019, the Parks Project levy continues to remain at $15,000.
Administration/Finance will evaluate these levy items throughout the CIP process to
determine if there will be any adjustment to these levies for the 2020 budget.
• Equipment/Projects
Under the Capital Projects Levy, a levy is proposed to be designated to Capital
Equipment/Project expenditures identified through the CIP process. Through this
designation, the City, over time, will build a fund reserve to avoid cash flow "spikes" and
address a wide range of capital improvement needs such as facility maintenance projects
under a more controlled spending environment. The 2018 levy was $275,000, the 2019
budget was also set at $275,000.
Administration will likely be recommending the same $275,000 for 2020.
• Capital Equipment/Projects
This was a reassigned levy in 2017 to provide for the 2017 equipment purchases.
Administration/Finance proposed a straight $500,000 Capital Equipment Purchases
Levy for the 2017 equipment purchases rather than through debt service levy and an
equipment bond. This process continued through 2018 but increased the levy by $25,000
to $525,000. In 2019, this levy is turned back to debt service levy for the City Campus
Master Plan implementation.
Administration will not be recommending a Capital Eguipment/Proiect levy for 2020;
equipment purchases for 2020 will be proposed to be through the debt service levy and
an equipment bond.
• Facility Maintenance
This was a new $50,000 levy proposed for 2018. A facility condition assessment study
identified many maintenance repairs for City facilities such as roof repairs, HVAC,
electrical panels, fire alarm systems, windows and air quality related items. This levy
was increased to $355,000 for the 2019 budget to help address significant deferred
maintenance items that have been identifiedfor buildings (Public Works & Community
Center) being evaluated as potential expansion projects within the City Campus Master
Plan. Going forward, this levy could stay as a straight Capital Improvement Levy or
could be converted to a Debt Service Levy based on market conditions at the time of the
project.
Administration/Finance will he evaluating this levy throughout the CIP process to
determine if there will be any adjustment recommended for 2020.
Debt Service Levy:
Annually the Finance Department conducts a detailed debt service analysis to monitor outstanding
debt and to look for early debt retirement or refinancing opportunities that will yield interest
expense savings to the City. (Staffalong with Ehlers & Associates will complete reviews to see if
any refinancing opportunities are available at this time; we will then continue to monitor refunding
opportunities, as markets can move quickly, and calculate potential savings for each issue that
may meet parameters which may generate savings.)
The current 2019 Debt Service levy is as follows:
• 2010A G.O.Open Space Referendum
• 2012C Taxable G.O. Abatement Bonds
• 2014A G.O. Equipment Certificates
• 2016A G.O. Equipment Certificates
• 2018A Capital Improvement Plan Bonds
Total
183,989 (The last year is 2021)
969,378 (The last year is 203 1)
294,525 (The last year is 2019)
142,837 (The last year is 2020)
525,000 (The last year is 2043)
$2,115,729
Staff will review with the Council at the meeting but note that the 2019 Debt Service levy reflects
the reassignment of the $525,000 Capital Projects Levy back to Debt Service Levy for the City
Campus Master Plan implementation.
For the 2020 Debt Service Levy. Administration will likely be recommend replacing the expiring
2014A G.O. Equipment Certifcates Bond with a 2020 G.O. Equipment Certificates Bond, also
the 2020 Debt Service Levy will contain a 2019 G.O Abatement Bond debt service levy if the
Community Center Expansion Project is approved to move forward to construction.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is requested to receive a presentation and provide direction to staff.
d,
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Councilmembers
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
March 2019 General Fund Budget Progress Report
April 30, 2019
INTRODUCTION
The City of Andover 2019 General Fund Budget contains total revenues of $11,378,046 and total
expenditures of $11,740,993; a decrease in fund balance is planned.
Monthly reporting of the City Budget progress to the Governing body is a recommended financial
practice and often viewed positively by rating agencies.
DISCUSSION
Attached is the General Fund Revenue & Expenditure Budget Summary - Budget Year 2019,
reflecting year to date actual through March 2019. The attachments are provided to assist
discussion in reviewing 2019 progress; other documents may be distributed at the meeting.
The following represents Administration's directives and departmental expectations that were in
place for 2018 and will be in effect for 2019:
1. Expenditure budgets while approved, expenses are to meet with the spirit that needs are
fulfilled first, expansions of service and special requests are to be reviewed with City
Administration before proceeding.
2. Departments are to be committed to search for the best possible prices when purchasing goods
and services.
3. Departments are to be committed to continually searching out new efficiencies and to
challenge the status quo of how the City provides services.
4. Departments are to be committed to searching out collaborative opportunities to facilitate
efficient and cost-effective utilization of governmental assets and personnel.
5. Departments are to be committed to developing effective, consistent and ongoing
communications with City residents, businesses and other stakeholders.
6. Departments are to be cognizant that services provided are subject to available revenues and
should not commit to services that are not sustainable.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is requested to receive a presentation from staff.
Fectfully submitted,
ickinson
Attachment
CITY OF ANDOVER
General Fund Budget Summary Totals
Budget Year 2019
2018 2019
REVENUES Budget Mar YTD %Bud Final Budget Mar YTD %Bud
General Property Tax
$ 8,721,256
$ 7,707
0%
$ 8,634,130 $ 9,023,970
$ -
0% 0
L' enscc and Permits
177906
7361R
9°
�a 384.900
116.530!
30%9
Intergovernmental
788,274
204,013
26%
829,860 787,918
202,094
26%
Charges for Services
746,700
109,595
15%
888,947 708,700
185,038
26%
Fines
90,250
12,142
13%
73,719 75,250
11,670
16%
Investment Income
75,000
(27,033)
-36%
107,560 75,000
(36,426)
49%
Miscellaneous
129,300
21,460
17%
176,662 134,300
23,221
17%
Transfers In
178,558
178,558
100%
178,558 188,008
188,008
100%
Total Revenues
S 11107,238
S 580,060
5%
S 11,451,961 S 11,378,046
S 690,135
6%
Street Signs
219,418
2018
19%
206,890
227,527
2019
15%
EXPENDITURES
Budget
Mar YTD
%Bud
Final
Budget
Mar YTD
%Bud
Street Lighting
GENERALGOVERNMENT
5,490
14%
32,829
40,400
5,434
13%
Street Lights - Billed
Mayor and Council
$ 91,298
$ 41.267
45%
$ 87,813
$ 107,751
$ 44,982
42%
Administration
203,833
45,236
22%
198,945
215,952
47,739
22%
Newsletter
26,000
5,406
21%
17,770
26,800
5,973
22%
Human Resources
28,431
7,358
26%
13,666
28,771
7,844
27%
Attorney
191,360
31,318
16%
188,031
197,041
31,927
16%
City Clerk
155,608
35,143
23%
149,770
163,651
37,039
23%
Elections
59,781
2,876
5%
50,629
65,640
3,017
5%
Finance
278,660
77,114
28%
272,851
290,752
78,902
27%
Assessing
154,000
-
0%
149,040
154,000
-
0%
Information Services
180,597
40,398
22%
171,637
187,743
39,389
21%
Planning & Zoning
438,827
97,093
22%
422,984
456,887
98,553
22%
Engineering
553,765
125,189
23%
527,688
575,968
131,168
23%
Facili Manaement
°
__.49,7641_.,.,
_6,24,944
14058 ..
20°
Total General Gov
3,040,679
603,964
20%
2,748,465
3,166,900
667,119
21%
PUBLICSAFETY
Police Protection
3,053,526
763,382
25%
3,053,526
3,183,610
795,903
25%
Fire Protection
1,423,914
252,980
18%
1,445,167
1,471,101
255,500
17%
Protective Inspection
462,164
100,582
22%
436,789
479,543
108,444
23%
Civil Defense
32,502
5,676
17%
18,060
29,184
7,034
24%
Animal Control
5,950
150
3%
2,809
5,950
430
7%
Total Public Safety
4978056
1,122,770
23%
4,956,351
5,169,388
19167,311
23%
PUBLIC WORKS
Streets and Highways
659,943
116,947
18%
656,194
696,225
92,710
13%
Street Signs
219,418
42,250
19%
206,890
227,527
33,764
15%
Traffic Signals
37,000
3,687
10%
33,857
39,500
3,613
9%
Street Lighting
40,400
5,490
14%
32,829
40,400
5,434
13%
Street Lights - Billed
220,500
19,454
9%
142,937
180,500
24,337
13%
Park & Recreation
1,318,395
212,973
16%
1,282,415
1,352,017
213,095
16%
Natural Resource Preservation
15,074
260
0%
5,158
18,107
260
1%
Recycling
157,216
32,763
22%
199,182
168,626
47,803
28%
Total Public Works
3,230,652
708,579
22%
3,158,490
3,309,277
775,837
23
OTHER
Miscellaneous 31,828 1,615 5% 233,440 56,828 1,500 3%
Youth Services 38,600 8,500 22% 8,500 38,600 8,500 22%
Total Other 70,428 10,115 14% 241,940 95,428 10,000 10%
Total Expenditures S 11„319,815 S 2,445,428 22% S 11,105,246 S 11,740,993 S 2,620,267 22%
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) S (212,577) S (1,865,368) 8 346,715 S (362,947) S (1,930,132)
NDOVLf^ ((06
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: March 2019 City Investment Reports
DATE: April 30, 2019
INTRODUCTION
Summary reporting of the City Investment portfolio to the Governing body is a recommended
financial practice and often viewed positively by rating agencies.
Furthermore, the City of Andover Investment Policy recommends the Finance Director presents
to the City Council at least quarterly the type of investments held by the City.
DISCUSSION
Attached is the Investment Maturities Summary for March 2019, the March 2019
Investment Detail Report, and the March 2019 Money Market Funds Report. These
attachments are intended to provide a status report on the March 2019 investments.
ACTION REQUESTED
)r Council review. Staff will provide a brief presentation and answer questions.
mitted,
Investment Maturities - March 2019
Total investments
Deposits
Total cash and investments
Credit
Investment Type
Rating
Fair
Less Than
Money market funds
N/A
MN Municipal Money
Value
Market Fund (4M)
N/A
Certificates of deposit
FDIC
Local governments
A/Al/A2
$
AA/AA1/AA2/AA3
$
AAA
State governments
A/A1/A2
AA/AAI/AA2/AA3
13,421,569
AAA
U.S. agencies
AAA
U.S. agencies
N/A
Total investments
Deposits
Total cash and investments
$ 48,855,862 $ 29,469,081 $ 16,791,914 $ 2,163,232 $ 431,635
1,545,128
$ 50,400,991
Investment Maturities (in Years)
Fair
Less Than
More Than
Value
1
1 - 5
6-10
10
$ 999,622
$ 999,622
$
$
$
10,886,346
10,886,346
-
13,421,569
9,235,203
4,186,366
-
-
344,766
184,466
60,137
100,163
-
5,599,921
1,546,610
2,524,792
1,428,208
100,311
5,007,068
1,795,999
2,403,359
476,387
331,324
203,710
-
203,710
-
-
931,293
84,943
846,350
-
-
467,612
-
467,612
-
10,993,955
4,735,893
6,099,588
158,474
$ 48,855,862 $ 29,469,081 $ 16,791,914 $ 2,163,232 $ 431,635
1,545,128
$ 50,400,991
March 2019 Investment Detail
Description
Cusip
Number
Credit
Rating/F
DIC#
Type
Purchase Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Rate ValueAcquired
Interest Current Market7matudty
Date Coupon
Date
Maturity 1
Due Date
Beal Bank SSB
07370XDZ4
32574
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.000% 244,975.5004/11/18
none
04/10/19
Skowhegan Svgs Bk
83084FAR2
19532
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.350% 245,009.8012/14/18
none
04/15/19
Bank Hapoalim, BM of NY
06251AT42
33686
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.100% 244,973.0504120/18
none
04/18/19
Bank Baroda New York
06062RC42
33681
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245.000.00
2.050% 244,958.3504/23/18
none
04/23/19
Berkshire Bk Pittsfield MA
084601NP4
23621
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
1.950% 244,938.7504/24/18
none
04/24/19
Customers Bank
23204HFA1
34444
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.000% 244,892.20
semi-annual
02/21/18 08/21/18
05/21/19
Banner Bank
06652XFP5
28489
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
1.850% 244,850.55
semi-annual
02/23118 08/23/18
05123/19
First Foundation Bk
32026UFSO
58647
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.000% 244,875.05
semi-annual
02/28118 08/28/18
05128119
Ally Bank Midvale Utah
02006LF32
57803
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
1.200% 244,255.20
semi-annual
06/30/16 12/30/16
07/01/19
Barclays Bank
06740KHB6
57203
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.050% 246,762.88
semi-annual
07/03/14 01/02/15
07/02/19
Synchrony Bank
87164WBT4
27314
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.050% 246,730.77
semi-annual
07/11/14 01/11/15
07/11/19
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
48125Y51-4
628
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
1.100% 244,115.55
quarterly
07/15/16 10/15/16
07/15/19
Farmers & Merchants Banc
30810NBGO
1895
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.300% 244,946.10
semi-annual
07/17/18 01/17/19
07/17/19
BankUnited A Savings
066519FX2
58979
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.300% 244,924.05
maturity
07/18/18 none
07/18/19
MountainOne Bank
62452ACG3
90253
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.250% 244,887.30
maturity
07/18/18 none
07/18/19
_ _
PrivateBank & Trust Cc
74267GU08
33306
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.000% 246,703.60
semi-annual
07/21114 01/21/15
07/22/19
Goldman Sachs Bank USA
38147JU59
33124
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.050% 246,664.08
semi-annual
07/23/14 01/23/15
07/23/19
Sallie Mae Bank
795450895
58177
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
1.700% 244,389.95
semi-annual
08/09117 02/09/18
08109/19
Town Bank
892094CK7
34717
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.300% 244,902.00
maturity
08/30/18 none
08/09/19
First Federal Svgs Bk
32021YCH4
29690
CD
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
1.500% 248,633.97
monthly
01/21/16 02/21/16
08/21/19
Santander Bank NA
80280JRQB
29950
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.300% 244,870.15
maturity
09/05/18 none
09/05/19
Valley N/B
919853BB6
9396
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.350% 244,921.60
maturity
09/06/18 none
09/06/19
Victory Bank
92644LAB8
58615
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.000% 246,503.53
semi-annual
09/24/14 03/24/15
09/24/19
BMO Harris Bk Nat Assoc
05581WA70
16571
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.450% 245,058.80
semi-annual
08/31/18 09/01/18
10/01/19
10/25/19
CommerceWest Bank N/A
20084TKXO
57176
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.300% 244,838.30
semi-annual
04/25/18 10/25/18
Umpqua Bk Roseburg Ore
90421MBZ5
17266
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.350% 244,904.45
semi-annual
04/27/18 10/27/18
10/28/19
Third Federal Sav & Loan
88413648
30012
CD
128,000.00
128,000.00
128,000.00
2.000% 127,715.84
semi-annual
11/24/14 05/24/15
11/25/19
1 Year CD - Premier Bank
1091003210
21714
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.500% 245,000.00
maturity
12/16/18 none
12116/19
1 Year CD- Premier Bank Rochester
2055214401
33202
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.500% 245,000.00
maturity
12/16/18 none
12116/19
1 Year CD - Premier Bank MN
3041574901
33204
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.500% 245,000.00
maturity
12/16/18 none
12/16/19
1 Year CD - Premier Bank
1091003211
CO
275,000.00
275,000.00
275,000.00
2.500% 275,000.00
maturity
12/17/18 none
12/17/19
Celtic Bank
15ilBRJMO
57056
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.050% 246,636.91
semi-annual
12/20/13 06/20/14
12/20/19
Steams Bank NA
857894PB9
10988
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
1.000% 246,370.15
semi-annual
12/26/14 06/26/15
12/26/19
Compass Bk
20451 PVJ2
19048
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.650% 245,384.65
semi-annual
10/11/18 04/11/19
01/13/20
Kearny Bank
48714LASB
28765
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.750% 245,580.65
semi-annual
12121/18 06/21/19
01/21/20
Fifth Third Bank
316777WS6
6672
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.500% 245,049.00
maturity
03113/19 none
03/13/20
MizuhoBank USA
60688MYG3
21843
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.500% 245,049.00
maturity
03/13119 none
03/13/20
US Bank NA
90333VL32
6548
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.450% 244,931.40
maturity
03/13/19 none
03/13/20
Elbow Lake MN
284281KC5
A
local
170,045.70
170,045.70
165,000.00
2.750% 164,440.65
semi-annual
12/08/14 none
12/01/19
Oneida County NY
6824543R2
Al
local
22,877.60
22,877.60
20,000.00
6.250% 20,025.40
semi-annual
08/16/10 none
04/15/19
Ramsey MN
751813PB6
AA-
local
158,677.85
158,677.85
145,000.00
4,500%1 145,000.00
semi-annual
02/16/12 04/01/16
04/01/19
9,235,203.13 CD
Description
Number
umbo
Credit
Rating/F
DIC#
Type
Purchase Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest Current Market
Rate Value
Interest Paid
Date Coupon Maturity)
Acquired Date Due Date
Cedar Rapids IA
150528RMI
AA1
local
217,672.00
217,672.00
200,000.00
3.000% 200,140.00
semi-annual
06/11/13 12/01/13 06/01/19
Multnomah Cnty OR Sch Dist 1J
625517JMO
AA1
local
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
1.450% 249,475.00
semi-annual
08/10/17 12115/17 06/15/19
Minneapolis MN
60374YS81
AA1
local
278,632.50
278,632.50
250,000.00
3.500% 251,455.00
semi-annual
02/26/13 none 12/01/19
Sioux City IA
829458FC7
AA2
local
156,100.50
156,100.50
155,000.00
2.000% 154,806.25
semi-annual
12/22/16 none 06/01/19
Waterloo IA
941647PAl
AA2
local
50,559.50
50,559.50
50,000.00
2.000%1 49,949.00
semi-annual
06/27/13 12/01/13 06/01/19
Western Lake Superior MN
958522WU4
AA2
local
100,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
3.150% 100,271.00
semi-annual
08/16/11 04/01/12 10/01/19
Portsmouth VA
73723RSL8
AA2
local
286,268.00
286,268.00
295,000.00
2.400% 294,628.30
semi-annual
07/17/13 02/01/14 02/01/20
Moorhead MN
6161412117
AA3
local
108,820.00
108,820.00
100,000.00
3.800% 100,885.00
semi-annual
11/14/11 none 02101/20
Palm Beach Cnty FLA
696497TR7
AAA
local
87,444.75
87,444.75
75,000.00
5.898% 75,232.50
semi-annual
07/06/11 none 06/01/19
Tenn Val Auth Cpn Strip Zero Cpn
88059EWZ3
AAA
local
262,890.00
262,890.00
122,464.80
300,000.00
120,000.00
298,398.00
maturity
12/27/13 none 06/15/19
Norwalk Conn
668844DS9
AAA
local
122,464.80
4.050% 120,129.60
semi-annual
08/04/10 08/01111 08/01/19
Greensboro NC
39546OV21
AAA
local
366,832.80
366,832.80
360,000.00
3.263% 361,213.20
semi-annual
07/15/11 none 10/01/19
Mounds View MN ISD #621
620637V70
778731AZ2
AAA
local
246,875.00
246,875.00
250,000.00
1.900% 248,565.00
semi-annual
05/16/18 none 02/01/20
Rothsay MN ISD #850
AAA
local
208,640.25
208,640.25
195,000.00
3.000% 197,451.15
semi-annual
07/06/16 none 02/01/20
Saint Paul MN Port Auth
793028WS6
AAA
local
201,806.00
201,806.00
200,000.00
2.000% 198,754.00
semi-annual
12/22/16 08/01/17 02/01/20
Woodbury MN
97913PCQ7
AAA
local
123,037.35
123,037.35
115,000.00
3.250% 115,313.95
semi-annual
12/22/11 none 02/01120
Dallas TXlndplSchDist
235308QK2
AAA
local
116,900.00
116,900.00
100,000.00
4.450% 101,546.00
semi-annual
04/16/12 08/15/11 02/15/20
Saint Paul MN Port Auth
793067CC1
AAA
local
79,756.80
79,756.80
80,000.00
2.000% 79,395.20
semi-annual
01/10/17 09/01117 03/01/20
Colorado St Hsg&Fin Auth
196479A82
AA2
slate
84,864.00
84,864.00
85,000.00
1.875% 84,943.05
semi-annual
01/26/18 none 05/01/19
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp
3137EADZ9
AAA
US
297,417.00
297,417.00
300,000.00
1.125% 299,844.00
semi-annual
12/14/17 10115/16 04/15/19
_
Fed Nat[ Mtg Assn
3135GOK28
AAA
US
299,700.00
299,700.00
249,035.00
300,000.00
1.250% 299,748.00
semi-annual
07/19/17 10/26/16 04/26/19
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp
3137EADK2
AAA
US
249,035.00
250,000.00
1.250% 248,995.00
semi-annual
07/07/17 02/01/13 08/01/19
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Med Term Note
3134G96U6
AAA
US
200,000.00
200,000.00
200,000.00
1.050% 198,876.00
quarterly
08/23/16 11/23/16 08/23/19
Fed Home Ln Bank
313383VN8
AAA
US
301,065.00
301,065.00
300,000.00
2.000% 299,355.00
semi-annual
12/07/17 none 09/13/19
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EGVJ1
AAA
US
297,300.00
297,300.00
300,000.00
1.160% 298,305.00
semi-annual
12/08/17 none 09/26119
Fed Home Ln Bank
3130ACLS1
AAA
US
248,227.50
248,227.50
250,000.00
1.550% 248,787.50
semi-annual
01/04/18 04/11/18 10/11/19
Fed Home Ln Bank
3130ABNRO
AAA
US
294,603.00
294,603.00
300,000.00
1.125% 297,804.00
semi-annual
04/10/18 10/11/16 10/11/19
RFCSP Strip Principal Zero Coupon
76116FAA5
AAA
US
185,568.00
185,568.00
200,000.00
197,300.00
maturity
07/22/15 none 10/15/19
Fed Nag Will Assn
3135GOJ95
AAA
US
98,570.00
98,570.00
100,000.00
1.350% 99,358.00
semi-annual
02/09/18 10/28/16 10/28/19
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EGBKO
AAA
US
199,600.00
199,600.00
200,000.00
1.300% 198,640.00
semi-annual
05/25/16 11/25/16 11/25/19
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Zero Cpn
31340OBV4
AAA
US
950,527.00
950,527.00
1,000,000.00
983,030.00
maturity
11/02/15 none 11/29/19
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EGFRI
AAA
US
223,031.25
223,031.25
225,000.00
1.330% 223,366.50
semi-annual
11/03/17 none 12/16/19
Fed Home Ln Bank
313381ND3
AAA
US
147,300.00
147,300.00
150,000.00
1.450% 148.879.50
semi-annual
03/23/18 none 01/09/20
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp
3137EAEE5
AAA
US
297,912.00
297,912.00
300,000.00
1.500% 297,747.00
semi-annual
12/07/17 07/17117 01/17/20
Fed Home Ln Bank
313OA3XL3
AAA
US
99,500.00
99,500.00
100,000.00
1.500% 99,160.00
semi-annual
07/22/15 08/10/15 02/10/20
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Med Term Note
3134G9ML8
AAA
US
294,390.00
294,390.00
300,000.00
1.300% 296,697.00
semi-annual
12/10118 none 03/16/20
17,583,112.88
Jefferson Bk & Tr Cc
472376AD4
1071
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.450% 244,919.15
semi-annual
04/11/18 10/11/18 04/10/20
CitiBank NA
17312QJ34
7213
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.550% 245,169.05
semi-annual
04111/18 10/11/18 04/13/20
Discover Bk Greenwood Del
254673NR3
5649
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.500% 245,044.10
semi-annual
04/11/18 10/11/18 04113120
Iberia Bank
45083AJL7
28100
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.600% 245,298.90
semi-annual
07/12/18 01/11/19 04/13/20
3,527,074.20 local
84,943.05 state
4,735,892.50 US
Description
Cusip
Number
Credit
Rating/F
DIC #
Type
Purchase Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
Date
Interest Paid Acquired
Coupon
Date
Maturity/
Due Date
Bank of America, NA
06051VD37
17318LAP9
3510
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.850%
246,078.00
semi-annual 12/12/18
06/12/19
06/12/20
06/26120
Citizens Alliance Bank
1402
CD
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
2.000%
248,312.76
monthly 06/27/14
07/27/14
Morgan Stanley Bank NA
61747M3Q2
32992
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.750%
245,852.60
semiannual 07/12/18
01112/19
07/13/20
Morgan Stanley Private Bank
61760AMT3
34221
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.750%
245,857.50
semi-annual 07/12f18
07/14/18
07/13120
MUFG Union Bank NA
624786CY3
22826
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.600%1
245,392.00
semi-annual 07/17/18
01/17/19
07/17/20
Enerbank USA
29266NA31
57293
CD
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
2.100%
247,804.80
monthly 07/18/14
08/18/14
07/20/20
NBT Bank Norwich
628779FT2
7230
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.700%
245,710.50
semi-annual 07/18/18
01/18/19
07120120
First Republic Bank
33616CBL3
59017
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.800%
246,129.45
semi-annual 08131/18
09/01/18
08/28/20
Merchants State Bank
589227AF4
1125
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.650%
245,786.45
semi-annual 08131/18
02/28/19
08128/20
Wax Bk
92937CHY7
34697
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
3.000%
246,969.60
semi-annual 10110/18
04/10/19
10/13/20
_
Cit Bank Nat Assn
12556LAT3
58978
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
3.000%
247,214.80
semi-annual 12/17/18
06/17/19
12/17/20
First Source Bank
33646CKP8
9087
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
3.150%
248,162.95
semi-annual 12/17/18
06/17119
11/17/21
Raymond James Bk
75472RAA9
33893
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
2.950%
246,663.55
semi-annual 01125/19
07/25/19
01/25/22
Kaufman TX
486206KR5
A3
local
61,821.00
61,821.00
60,000.00
3.000%
60,136.80
semi-annual 06/28116
02/15/17
02/15/23
Chaska MN
161663653
AA
local
83,725.60
83,725.60
80,000.00
4.000%
81,031.20
semi-annual 09/08114
none
02/01/24
Steams Cc MN
857896MH4
AA+
local
276,875.00
276,875.00
250,000.00
4.500%
250,390.00
semi-annual 04/17/13
none
06/01/20
Hampton VA
4095582,11
AA1
local
100,836.00
100,836.00
100,000.00
2.209%
99,586.00
semi-annual 01/20/16
none
04/01/20
Middleton WI
596782RX2
W
local
106,979.00
106,979.00
100,000.00
3.750%
100,110.00
semi-annual 02/24/15
none
09/01/20
Bristol VA
110331NT8
AA1
local
251,562.50
251,562.50
250,000.00
3.002%
252,055.00
semi-annual 07/05/18
none
10101/20
Des Moines IA Area Cmnty Col
2500971-121
AA1
local
50,606.00
50,606.00
50,000.00
2.450%
49,791.00
semi-annual 11/10/14
12/01/14
06/01/21
Minneapolis MN
60374YG68
AA1
local
110,419.00
110,419.00
100,000.00
4.700%
100,193.00
semi-annual 10/31/11
none
03/01/23
Ashwaubenon WI Sch Dist
045153FQ1
AA2
local
197,460.00
197,460.00
200,000.00
1.890%
200,000.00
semi-annual 12/18118
04/01/19
04/01/20
Brunswick Cnty
117061VH1
AA2
local
108,967.10
108,967.10
110,000.00
1.740%
108,522.70
semi-annual 08/21/15
none
05/01/20
Fon Du Lac Cnty WI
344442KK3
AA2
local
259,715.00
259,715.00
250,000.00
3.250%
251,425.00
semi-annual 03/10/17
none
03/01/21
Adams & Arapahoe Cntys CO
005482W83
AA2
local
117,817.50
117,817.50
115,000.00
3.930%
117,295.40
semi-annual 07/12118
none
12/01/21
Alexandria MN ISD #206
015131LQ6
AA2
local
279,760.50
279,760.50
270,000.00
3.000%
273,547.80
semi-annual 01/21115
none
02/01/23
Bangor ME
060095484
AA2
local
235,428.00
109,541.00
235,428.00
109,541.00
240,000.00
2.850%
242,356.80
semi-annual 11/21/18
none
11/01/23
Whitewater Wis
966204KA6
AA3
local
100,000.00
4.850%
103,737.00
semi-annual 06/09/11
none
12/01/20
Georgetown MA
372838KG6
AA3
local
98,922.00
98,922.00
100,000.00
2.500%
99,270.00
semi-annual 02/20/19
12/15/20
12/15/21
West Bend WI
951428BNO
AA3
local
97,805.00
97,805.00
100,000.00
1.900%
98,254.00
semi-annual 01/11/18
none
04/01/22
W Palm Beach FL
955116BE7
AA3
local
101,245.00
101,245.00
100,000.00
2.264%
97,227.00
semi-annual 07/05/16
10/01/16
10/01/22
Tenn Valley Auth Zero Cpm
88059EHD9
AAA
local
263,970.00
263,970.00
300,000.00
291,654.00
maturity 03/11/13
none
05/01/20
Salt Lake County UT
795676QL2
AAA
local
368,212.50
368,212.50
375,000.00
1.800%
371,790.00
semi-annual 05/18/18
06/15/13
06/15/20
Tenn Val Auth Cpn Strip Zero Cpn
88059EMX9
AAA
local
88,133.00
88,133.00
100,000.00
96,671.00
maturity 03/18/13
none
07/15/20
McAllen TX Dev Corp
579086AW9
AAA
local
175,000.00
175,000.00
175,000.00
1.400%
172,249.00
semi-annual 07/26/16
02/15/17
08/15/20
Indianapolis Ind
45528UGF2
AAA
local
251,507.50
251,507.50
250,000.00
2.219%
249,055.00
semi-annual 07111117
07/15/13
01/15/21
Mounds View MN ISD #621
620637V88
AAA
local
378,408.80
378,408.80
385,000.00
2.050%
381,839.15
semi-annual 12/20118
none
02/01/21
Rochester MN
771588RH5
AAA
local
254,532.50
254,532.50
250,000.00
3.750%
254,202.50
semi-annual 12/19118
none
02/01121
Greenway MN ISD #31
39678LDF6
AAA
local
27,593.50
27,593.50
25,000.00
5.000%
25,037.75
semi-annual 07/09/13
none
03/15/21
Baltimore Cnty MD
05914FME7
AAA
local
51,290.00
51,290.00
50,000.00
2.097%
49,316.00
semi-annual 08/31/16
none
08/01/21
New York St Mtge Agy
64988RHGO
AAA
local
100,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
2.375%
99,450.00
semi-annual 10/27/15
04/01/16
10/01/21
Columbus OH
199492CS6
AAA
local
39,956.40
39,956.40
40,000.00
2.133%1
39,508.00
semi-annual 02/20/15
none
12/01/21
4,186,366.36 CD
Description
NumbCusi
Number
Credit
Rating/F
DIC #
Type
Purchase Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
Interest Paid
Date
Acquired
Coupon
Date
Maturity 1
Due Date
Outagamie Cnty WI
Savage Minn
68990OB98
AAA
local
170,000.00
170,000.00
170,000.00
200,000.00
2.350%
169,364.20
semi-annual
11/07/17
05/01/18
11101/22
80465PAN4
AAA
local
198,018.00
198,018.00
4.800%
203,222.00
semi-annual
06/17/10
02/01/11
02/01/24
Connecticut State
20772JQN5
Al
state
214,954.00
214,954.00
200,000.00
3.517%
203,710.00
semi-annual
05/27/16
02/15/14
08115121
Massachusetts State
57582P2T6
AAt
state
199,744.00
199,744.00
200,000.00
2.090%
199,042.00
semi-annual
12/17114
11101/14
05101120
Vermont State Hsg Fin Agy
92419RAE2
AA2
state
74,130.75
74,130.75
75,000.00
2.550%
74,964.75 1
semi-annual
08/28/18
05/01/18
11101121
Florida St Hurricane
34074GDH4
AA3
state
279,439.80
279,439.80
270,000.00
2.995%
271,425.60
semi-annual
11/10/15
07/01/13
07101/20
Minnesota St Colleges & Univ
60414FPJ3
AA3
state
100,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
2.000%
99,140.00
semi-annual
02126/15
10/01115
10101/20
Florida Sl Dept Environmental
34160WUAO
AA3
state
217,800.00
217,800.00
200,000.00
6.206%
201,778.00
semi-annual
08/30/10
07/01/10
07/01/22
Tennessee State
880541 QQ3
AAA
stale
48,218.85
48,218.85
45,000.00
3.178%
45,478.80
semi-annual
08130/16
02101/12
08/01/20
Virginia State
928109XD4
AAA
state
22,126.00
22,126.00
20,000.00
4.100%
20,052.80
semi-annual
02/07/12
none
06/01/21
Kentucky St Hsg Corp
49130TSHO
AAA
state
203,458.00
203,458.00
200,000.00
2.780%
200,462.00
semi-annual
03/29/17
none
07/01/21
Georgia State
3733842Q8
AAA
state
204,444.00
204,444.00
200,000.00
2.780%
201,618.00
semi-annual
12/13/16
none
02/01/23
Fed Home Ln Bank
3130AECJ7
AAA
AAA
US
300,114.00
300,114.00
300,000.00
2.625%
300,648.00
semi-annual
07/12/18
11/28/18
05/28/20
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EHYM9
US
294,735.00
294,735.00
300,000.00
1.500%
296,442.00
semi-annual
01/17/19
03114/18
09/14/20
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Mad Term Note
3134GBS78
AAA
US
200,000.00
200,000.00
200,000.00
1.500%
198,586.00
semi-annual
10/27/17
04/27/18
10/27/20
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EJMX4
AAA
US
299,475.00
299,475.00
300,000.00
2.680%
300,006.00
semi-annual
07/12/18
11/02/18
11/02/20
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp
3137EAEK1
AAA
US
299,193.00
299,193.00
300,000.00
1.875%
297,714.00
semi-annual
12/07/17
05117/18
11/17/20
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EJPW3
AAA
US
299.769.00
299,769.00
300,000.00
2.700%
301,815.00
semi-annual
05/21/18
06/21118
12/21120
Fed Natl Mtg Assn _
Fed Home Ln Bank
3136G4JM6
3130ADG48
AAA
US
200,000.00
200,000.00
200,000.00
1.850%
198,334.00
semi-annual
12/28/16
06/28/17
12/28/20
AAA
US
296,718.75
296,718.75
300,000.00
2.250%
299,199.00
semi-annual
07/10/18
07/29/18
01/29/21
Fed Home Ln Bank
3130ADME9
AAA
US
297,516.00
297,516.00
300,000.00
2.375%
300,030.00
semi-annual
07/12/18
08/08118
02/08/21
Fed Home Ln MLq Corp Mad Term Note
3134G8KU2
AAA
US
246,407.50
246,407.50
250,000.00
1.250%
248,555.00
semi-annual
12/04/18
02/26/19
02/26/21
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EHCN1
AAA
US
295,215.00
295,215.00
300,000.00
2.140%
298,839.00
semi-annual
07/10/18
09/16/17
03/16/21
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EFX36
AAA
US
117,277.20
117,277.20
120,000.00
1.680%
118,394.40
semi-annual
01/17/19
10/05/16
04/05/21
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Med Term Note
3134GBP89
AAA
US
292,425.00
292,425.00
300,000.00
1.850%
297,132.00
semi-annual
08/07/18
04/26/18
04/26/21
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EGAH8
AAA
US
288,960.00
288,960.00
300,000.00
1.550%
295,035.00
semi-annual
10/10/18
11/17/16
05/17/21
Fed Home Ln Bank
3130A7Z73
AAA
US
153,217.50
153,217.50
155,000.00
1.250%
153,701.10
semi-annual
12/18/18
11/25/16
05/25/21
Fed Home Ln Bank
3130A82B8
AAA
US
294,030.00
294,030.00
300,000.00
1.000%
299,094.00
semi-annual
07/17/18
none
05/25121
Fed Nall Mtg Assn
313500035
AAA
US
300,249.00
300,249.00
300,000.00
2.750%
302,850.00
semi-annual
07/12/18
12/22/18
06/22/21
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EJUN7
AAA
US
300,000.00
300,000.00
300,000.00
2.860%
300,003.00
semi-annual
07/16/18
01/16/19
07/16/21
Fed Home Ln Bank
3130A8SR5
AAA
US
244,531.25
244,531.25
250,000.00
1.000%
247,987.50
semi-annual
07/10/18
none
07/27/21
Fed Home Ln Bank
3130A8MN0
AAA
US
194,414.00
194,414.00
200,000.00
1.625%
196,370.00
semi-annual
01/25/19
none
10/07/21
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EJPD5
AAA
US
299,700.00
299,700.00
300,000.00
2.870%
300,009.00
semi-annual
07/12/18
11/15/18
11/15/21
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Med Term Note
3134GAWP5
AAA
US
245,875.00
245,875.00
250,000.00
1.900%
248,640.00
semi-annual
12/04/18
02/23/16
11/23/21
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Med Term Note
3134GSPB5
AAA
US
300,000.00
300,000.00
300,000.00
2.500%
300,204.00
semi-annual
07/02/18
12/28/18
06/28/22
16,791,913.61
Itasca County Minn
465452GP9
A
local
105,024.00
105,024.00
100,000.00
5.550%
100,163.00
semi-annual
07/12/11
none
02/01128
Mitchell SD Sch Dist #17-2
606687EHO
AA
[Deal
116,702.00
116,702.00
100,000.00
6.000%
100,691.00
semi-annual
12/20/11
06/15/19
06/15/24
Ann Arbor Ml
035438CF5
AA1
local
262,025.00
262,025.00
250,000.00
5.750%
250,652.50
semi-annual
12/27/17
05/01/19
05/01/27
Milwaukee CnlyWI
602245XHO
AA2
local
254,142.50
254,142.50
250,000.00
5.100%
252,972.50
semi-annual
12124/18
10/01/19
10/01/24
Duluth MN
264438ZL9
AA2
local
29,767.20
29,767.20
30,000.00
2.625%
29,571.30
semi-annual
12105/12
08/01/13
02/01/25
4,988,287.30 local
1,517,671.95 state
6,099,588.00 US
Description
Cusip
Number
Credit
Rating/F
DIC #
Type
Purchase Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity Interest
Amount Rate
Current Market
Value
Interest Paid
Date
Acquired
Coupon
Date
Maturity)
Due Date
South Milwaukee WI
838855ZV9
AA2
local
327,798.25
159,000.00
327,798.25
325,000.00 3.350%
331,864.00
semi-annual•
01/25/19
04/01/19
10/01/26
11/01/27
Will County IL Cmnty Zero Coupon
969078OM9
AA2
local
159,000.00
500,000.00
362,280.00
maturity
08/25/09
none
Hawkins Cnty TN
420218PL7
AA3
local
111,480.00
111,480.00
100,000.00 4.800%
100,177.00
semi-annual
03/13/12
none
05/01/24
Lake City Minn ISD #813
508084DW7
AAA
local
103,933.00
103,933.00
100,000.00 5.000%
101,672.00
semi-annual
05/11111
none
02101/25
Tennessee Valley Auth Ser E
880591CJ9
AAA
local
121,500.00
121,500.00
100,000.00 6.750%
124,715.00
semi-annual
03/19/09
none
11/01/25
Ice Deposit- National Sports Center
none
local
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
maturity
02/06/08
none
01/01/26
Fed Home Ln Bank
3130A8W33
AAA
US
39,000.00
39,000.00
40,000.00 2.100%
38,590.00
semi-annual
07/27/17
08/22/17
08/22/25
Fed Farm Credit Bank
31331 VLC8
AAA
US
106,030.45
106,030.45
100,000.00 5.250%
119,884.00
semi-annual
02/26/10
none
04/21/28
2,163,232.30
Van Buren Mich Public Schools
920729HD5
AA1
local
102,750.00
102,750.00
100,000.00 6.430%
100,311.00
semi-annual
07/17/09
11/01/09
05/01/29
Anoka-Hennepin MN ISD #11
036303285
AAA
local
323,613.50
323,613.50
350,000.00 2.550%
331,324.00
semi-annual
01/25/19
none
02101/30
431,635.00
36,969,893.79
2,004,758.30 local
158,474.00 US
431,635.00 local
INVESTMENT SCHEDULE - Money Market Funds
March 31, 2019
Description
Current Market
Value
YTD Interest
Wells Fargo
1 Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund
$999,621.88
$14,095.27
4M
1 4M
1 1,025,327.421
5,472.40
4M PLUS
1 14M Plus
1 8,537.391
46.59
4M PLUS - CIP Bonds
7 14M Plus - CIP Bonds
9,852,481.57
40,300.92
Grand Total Money Market Funds 1 $11,885,968.26 1 $59,915.18
Updated: 4110/2019