HomeMy WebLinkAbout01.22.19?C I T Y 0 F
CN D6 06 AVYE
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Agenda
January 22, 2019
Andover City Hall
Council Chambers
7.00 p.m.
1. Call to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Appointment of Chair Person and Vice Chair Person
4. Approval of Minutes — January S, 2019 Regular Meeting
5. Public Hearing — Sketch Plan/Planned Unit Development — The Villas at
Crosstown Woods — Crosstown Blvd. NW and 161St Ave. NW — Landmark of
Andover LLC
6. Other Business
7. Adjournment
LNDOVE
6.._ -A
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners
FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner
SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes — January 8, 2019 Regular Meeting Minutes
DATE: January 22, 2019
REQUEST
The Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to approve the regular meeting minutes from
January 8, 2019.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING —JANUARY 8, 2019
The Regular Bi- Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was
called to order by Acting Chairperson Bert Koehler IV on January 8, 2019, 7:00 p.m., at
the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota.
Commissioners present: Dean Daninger, Scott Hudson, Nick Loehlein, Jeff Sims,
and Mary VanderLaan.
Commissioners absent: Kyle Nemeth
Also present: City Planner Stephanie Hanson
PLEDGE OFALLEGIANCE
APPROVAL OFMINUTES
November 13, 2018
Commissioner VanderLaan requested the following corrections:
Page 15, Line 22: "She noted that developer- had said the County..."
Acting Chairperson Koehler requested the following corrections:
Page 14, Line 16: "...would like to assttre ensure that the firetrucks..."
Motion by Daninger, seconded by Hudson, to approve the minutes as presented. Motion
carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent (Nemeth) vote.
PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit — Indoor Mini Storage Facility —
Bunker Lake Blvd NWManson Blvd NW — Travis Roche and Chris Beberg
City Planner Hanson noted the purpose of this item is to hold a public hearing and take
input on a request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct an indoor mini storage
facility, which is allowed in the industrial zoning district with a CUP. The property is
located north of Beberg Landscape Nursery and south of the existing ABC Mini Storage.
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes —January 8, 2019
Page 2
1 City Planner Hanson stated that the property is currently owned by Beberg Landscaping
2 but is no longer being used for storage of landscaping materials and advised that Mr.
3 Roche will be purchasing the property, contingent upon the approval of a CUP which
4 would allow expansion of the ABC Mini Storage facility that he owns. All storage will
5 occur indoors with this expansion.
6
7 City Planner Hanson displayed a concept plan of the site, which would contain five
8 buildings and provided the dimensions of the proposed buildings. This would be the
9 same layout as existing storage facility owned by Mr. Roche. The City has not been
10 made aware of any issues with security that have occurred since the construction of the
11 existing facility in 1986. An additional access is not requested, and the applicant is
12 proposing to utilize the entrance points for the existing facility.
13
14 City Planner Hanson provided additional details on the building materials and
15 architectural design review that would occur through the Andover Review Committee
16 (ARC). The vicinity of the site is comprised of old and new industrial building
17 construction and staff will recommend that the storage facility will use materials similar
18 to the new construction buildings in the area. The applicant has stated that the new
19 building will be of higher quality than the existing storage buildings. Additional review
20 and decision with be made during the ARC review.
21
22 City Planner Hanson reviewed the criteria that must be considered when reviewing a
23 CUP request and summarized how this condition meets those criteria. She stated that if
24 approved by the Commission, the next step would be for the applicant to provide the site
25 plan layout to the ARC for further review.
26
27 Motion by VanderLaan, seconded by Loehlein, to open the public hearing at 7:14 p.m.
28 Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent (Nemeth) vote.
29
30 Travis Roche, 7229 Comstock Lane N, Maple Grove, stated that he was present to
31 answer any questions the Commission may have.
32
33 Commissioner VanderLaan stated that it is good to know that there have not been any
34 complaints during the life of the existing ABC Mini Storage. She asked how the
35 applicant handles, or would handle, security issues using the example that the applicant
36 suspects contraband or other prohibited materials.
37
38 Mr. Roche replied that the facility is unique in that there is an on -site management team
39 that lives on the property in an attached unit. He stated that the management team has
40 lived on -site for six years and the television systems in the residential unit are linked to
41 the surveillance system for the facility. He stated that the management team gets to know
42 the tenants very well, noting that there have been tenants that have remained since the
43 facility first opened. He explained that they can only enter the units if the units become
44 in default and noted that they have a very low rate of default on the units.
45
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes — danuary 8, 2019
Page 3
1 Commissioner Daninger stated that this area is beginning to develop out and asked if the
2 applicant would be willing to use brick in the construction.
3
4 Mr. Roche stated that cost would be a factor in using full brick design. He stated that
5 they have priced out stone and faux brick and stone materials. He stated that once the
6 approval of the CUP is gained, he and his partner will spend more time on the design
7 materials and are willing to use the materials required by the City.
8
9 Commissioner Daninger asked staff if someone can live on -site.
10
11 City Planner Hanson replied that the City Code does allow for someone to live on that
12 property.
13
14 Commissioner Loehlein asked how business is at the existing facility and the projections
15 for the new expansion.
16
17 Mr. Roche replied that the existing facility has been running at 99.2 percent full and has
18 been running near that rate since he began ownership. He stated that the management
19 team receives a lot of interest calls for the larger units, but they have to turn away
20 business because of the lack of available units. He explained that when this neighboring
21 property became available, this seemed to be an attractive option for expansion.
22
23 Acting Chairperson Koehler stated that he did not see the height of the building and
24 asked if the height would be comparable to the existing buildings.
25
26 Mr. Roche confirmed that everything would be uniform in height from Hanson
27 Boulevard.
28
29 Acting Chairperson Koehler asked if the tenants can access the units 24 hours per day as
30 they are provided with a security code to access the site.
31
32 Mr. Roche replied that the hours tenants are able to access the site with their code are
33 limited between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. He confirmed that the hours would remain the
34 same. He noted that exceptions could be made on a case by case basis by the on -site
35 management team.
36
37 Acting Chairperson Koehler asked if the applicant intends to keep the third access point
38 shown on the drawing.
39
40 Mr. Roche replied that they would most likely put a locked gate at that location that could
41 be used for emergency access only.
42
43 Motion by Loehlein, seconded by Daninger, to close the public hearing at 7:24 p.m.
44 Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent (Nemeth) vote.
45
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes —January 8, 2019
Page 4
1 Motion by VanderLaan, seconded by Loehlein, to recommend to the City Council
2 approval of the resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit request for a mini
3 storage facility (indoor storage only) located at 13535 Grouse Street NW, PIN 34- 32 -24-
4 41 -0014. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent (Nemeth) vote.
5
6 City Planner Hanson stated that this item would be before the Council at the February 5,
7 2019 City Council meeting.
8
9 OTHER BUSINESS
10
11 City Planner Hanson updated the Planning Commission on related items that the City
12 Council has reviewed since the last meeting of the Commission in November. The City
13 Council will be meeting on January 22nd to discuss the density numbers and possible
14 areas for more commercial zoning to be included in the draft Comprehensive Plan. The
15 draft of the Comprehensive Plan is available for review on the City website.
16
17 City Planner Hanson advised of an upcoming meeting on February 261h which will be an
18 open house for the draft Comprehensive Plan from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m., noting that
19 Commission members are encouraged to attend. On March 26th the public hearing will
20 be held to review the draft Comprehensive Plan. The City Council will then review the
21 draft on April 161h
22
23 City Planner Hanson advised of the upcoming North Suburban Home Show which will
24 be held at the Community Center on March 9th from 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
25
26 Acting Chairperson Koehler stated that the draft Comprehensive Plan meetings fall on
27 Tuesdays, noting that some will align with regular Planning Commission meeting dates.
28 City Planner Hanson provided clarification on the dates for the regular Planning
29 Commission meetings and identified any conflicts.
30
31 ADJOURNMENT
32
33 Motion by Daninger, seconded by Sims, to adjourn the meeting at 7:30 p.m. Motion
34 carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent (Nemeth) vote.
35
36 Respectfully Submitted,
37
38
39
40 Amanda Staple, Recording Secretary
41 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
42
4 jj
iAl
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners
FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Sketch Plan/Conditional Use Permit (CUP)/Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Review — The Villas at Crosstown Woods — Landmark of
Andover LLC
DATE: January 22, 2019
INTRODUCTION
The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review a sketch plan for a single family
planned unit residential development known as The Villas at Crosstown Woods. The applicant
submitted a narrative of the proposed PUD. The PUD narrative is attached for your review.
DISCUSSION
What is a PUD Concept Plan?
A PUD Sketch Plan is used to provide feedback to the developer through Andover Review
Committee (ARC), Planning and Zoning Commission, Park and Recreation Commission, and
City Council.
Purpose of PUD?
The purpose of a PUD is to encourage more efficient allocation of density and intensity of land
use where such arrangement is desirable and feasible by providing the means for greater
creativity and flexibility in environmental design than provided under the strict application of this
code. It must be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City Council that a higher quality
development will result than could be otherwise achieved through strict application of this code.
Background
The Andover Review Committee (ARC) reviewed the sketch plan and submitted comments to
the applicant. These comments have been attached for your review. Staff suggests the
comments be reviewed as part of the sketch plan process. The applicant and staff met to discuss
the comments.
Conformance with Local and Regional Plans and Ordinances
1. The property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) Boundary.
2. The properties will be required to be rezoned from R -1 Single Family Rural to R -4 Single
Family Urban.
Access
A new access will be created from 1615 Avenue NW and off Crosstown Blvd. The plat will also
be accessed through the Miller's Woods development. Since the new access is from a county
road, Anoka County Highway Department will review and provide access requirements to the
applicant.
Utilities
Each of the lots will be served by municipal sewer and water. There are 43 sewer hook ups
allocated for this area; however, the Engineering Department determined there are an additional
sewer hook ups available in the trunk sewer system serving this area of the city. Staff supports
the 5 additional sewer hook ups to be allocated to this development; however, City Council will
make the final determination for the best use /allocation of the 5 additional units.
Lots
The property would be rezoned from R -1 Single Family Rural to R -4 Single Family Urban. R -1
City Code requirements include lot size requirements of 11,200 square feet and lot widths of 80
feet wide at the front yard setback line. The applicant is proposing to deviate from the R -4
standards.
Tree Preservation Plan
There are a significant number of trees throughout the property the developer is proposing to
preserve. The trees will provide a buffer between neighboring properties. As part of the PUD
process, the applicant is required to submit a tree protection plan showing trees to be preserved.
This will be required during the preliminary plat process.
Wetlands
There are minimal wetlands located within the sketch plan area. A map has been attached that
shows the existing wetland information according to available data. The wetlands will be
required to be delineated and the report will need to be submitted as part of the preliminary plat
process.
Coon Creek Watershed District (CCWD)
Once the overall layout of the sketch has been agreed upon and direction provided, the applicant
will prepare a grading plan, hydrology calculations and a soils report that will be reviewed by the
City, an engineering consultant and the CCWD. The CCWD will need to review the preliminary
plat and the applicant will need to address any issues that are raised during that review prior to a
public hearing being scheduled for the preliminary plat.
Park and Recreation Commission
The Park and Recreation Commission will review the request on February 7, 2019. The current
Master Park Plan does not show the potential of parkland in this area which leads staff to believe
that the Park and Recreation Commission may request cash -in -lieu of land for this development.
Coordination with other Agencies
The developer and/or owner are responsible to obtain all necessary permits (Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, LRRWMO, Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency, LGU and any other agency that may have an interest in the site).
Initial contact shall be made with the City Engineering Department regarding this item.
2
PUD
The applicant is requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD) as part of this development. The
applicant is requesting flexibility in the bulk area standards including size, dimension and
density, primarily to have flexibility to minimize tree removal and wetland impacts.
PUD Review
Applicable Ordinances
City Code 13 -3 -9 regulates the findings that are required for a PUD to be approved:
1. The proposed development is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan of
the City.
According to the Comprehensive Plan, the properties are to be developed as either
commercial or residential. The overall density of the proposed residential development
follows the Comprehensive Plan as well. The plan requires 1.5 — 3.6 houses per acre. The
proposed PUD development is 2.61 houses per acre; therefore, meets the density
requirements of the plan.
2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and
unified environment within its own boundaries.
The PUD would provide a buffer of existing vegetation to provide privacy from adjoining
properties and to separate the villas from the single - family homes to the south.
The PUD reduces the number of streets needed to serve the overall development.
A smaller footprint of the lot and home provides larger open space areas that will be
managed through a Homeowner's Association.
3. The proposed development demonstrates how each modified or waived requirement
contributes to achieving the purpose of PUD.
The table below depicts the proposed PUD standards:
Proposed PUD Standards:
No.
Item
R -4 Standard for
P.U.D. Request
Reason for Request
single - family
for detached
homes
single family
villas
1
Min. Lot Width
80 feet
53 -68 feet
A smaller lot width would better fit a villa and
allows for trees to be preserved instead of mass
site grading
2
Min. Lot Depth
130 feet
undetermined
3
Min. Lot Area
11,400 sq /ft
6,336 — 12,928
The smallest lot in the development is 6,336
s /ft with the largest being 12,928 s /ft
Front Setback
35 feet
16 feet from the
The reduced front yard setback allows
property line
houses /garages closer to the street and increases
4
the rear yard area/common ground. Enough
space is provided to park at least two vehicles
in each driveway.
5
Side Setback
10 feet
6.5 feet
6.5 -foot side yard setback on the garage side is
Garage side
6 feet
6.5 feet
in align with detached single - family
developments. 6.5 -foot setback would be
sufficient for a narrower lot.
6
Rear Setback
30 feet
20 feet
The setback reduction gives flexibility for
structure placement
Rear Setback to
NA
40 feet
County Road
7
Street Width
33 feet for public
32 feet for public
Consistent with Fire department comments
which allows enough room for emergency
vehicle movement and placement
City Code 13 -3 -11 identifies Desirable PUD Design Qualities that are sought in any PUD
proposal as listed below.
A. Achieves efficiency in the provision of streets and utilities and preserves area to achieve
the elements of design qualities described in this Chapter.
B. Provides convenient and safe access for vehicles and pedestrians and all types of activity
that are anticipated to be a part of the proposed development.
C. Provides a tree line buffer between backyards of back -to -back lots.
rd
D. Preserves existing stands of trees and /or significant trees and provides additional tree
plantings.
E. The proposed structures within the development demonstrate quality architectural design
and the use of high - quality building materials for unique design and detailing.
Homes
The PUD request is to allow detached single - family townhomes /villas. The housing styles and
architectural standards will be similar to the attached photos. The homes may provide stone on
the front elevation as well as maintenance free siding, hardy board, vinyl shakes and columns at
the entrances of each structure.
NEXT STEPS
Based on the feedback received on the sketch plan, the developer will modify the layout and
make application for Preliminary Plat, PUD, Rezoning and Final Plat and submittals to seek their
desired outcome.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to hold a public hearing, take public feedback on
the proposed sketch plan/PUD and informally advise the applicant on adjustments to the
proposed project to conform to local ordinances and review criteria.
Attachments
Location Map
Sketch/PUD Narrative
City Staff Comments, dated January 4, 2019
Aerial Wetlands Map
Proposed Villa Elevations
Sketch Plan of Proposed PUD/Detached Villas
Sketch Plan of Standard R -4 Single Family Urban Lots
K 1l -. ,
Cc: Nathan Fair, Landmark of Andover LLC, 13432 Hanson Blvd NW, Andover, MN 55304
Judith Carlson, P.O. Box 118, Andover, MN 55304
5
Andover General Mapping Map
Date Created: January 04, 2019
Disclaimer. The provider makes no representation or warranties with respect to the reuse of this data.
En
0
0
c
3
0
Cn
En
0
U
ro
En
M
a)
L
The Villas At Crosstown Woods
Landmark Of Andover, MN. LLC.
Andover, MN.
Sketch /Concept Plan Narrative
January 2, 2019
RECEIVED
JAM 2 2019
CITY nF AN'r)n�JE-R
w
a
0
U
Introduction
Landmark Development is pleased to submit this application for concept plan
review by the City of Andover. The land consists of two parcels, the Barth and
Carlson parcels, totaling +/- 18.4 acres. The property is bounded on the north by
Crosstown Blvd. N.W. and to the west by Co. Rd. 18.
Concept Plan Review
Landmark Development is requesting staff review of a concept plan to subdivide
these two parcels into 48 detached single family villas with lots ranging in size
from 6,336 sq. ft. to 12,928 sq. ft. The parcel consists of open fields, significant
hardwood and softwood vegetation and wetlands. The public streets have been
designed as to minimize the disturbance of the existing trees, wetlands and
current neighborhoods.
The proposed subdivision is located in the R4 zoning district. We are requesting a
P.U.D. to allow flexibility from the typical R4 standards.
Lot Standards
Single family homes in the R4 District require a minimum lot size of 11,400 sq. ft.
and a minimum lot width of 80. We are requesting flexibility in the bulk area R4
standards for lot size, dimension, setback, and density primarily in order to have
the flexibility to minimize tree removal, mass grading of the site and wetland
impacts.
Using traditional R4 zoning the site would support 41 single family lots with all of
the land platted into lots, see attached R4 plan. The requested P.U.D. plan shows
48 lots with a significant land set aside for preservation of the sites natural
systems.
Changes to the land are minimized with existing natural resources connected thus
enhancing the quality of life for residents while maintaining ecological functions
and biodiversity.
We are proposing a 60 foot right of way with a 32 foot street width as per city
requirements. A 16 foot front yard setback is proposed with a total front yard
distance from house to street of 30 feet. The side yard setbacks would be 6.5 feet
on each side, and the rear yard setback would be 20 feet from a property line and
40 feet from a County Road.
This design will contribute to the overall commitment of ecological conservation
to the site.
Neighborhood Connectivity
Our concept plan provides for overall improved neighborhood access with the
access off Constance Blvd. N.W. The plan also shows how the new street system
connects to the existing neighborhood to the south.
P.U.D. Flexibility
We are requesting city approval for flexibility from area, width, and setback
standards in the R4 district. In return our proposal will provide a low impact
development minimizing tree removal, wetland impacts and better neighborhood
traffic circulation.
The zoning code outlines specific design qualities that the city desires in a P.U.D..
Our plan addresses the following.
1. Achieves efficiency in the provision of streets and utilities and preserves
area to achieve the elements of design quality.
Our proposed plan achieves development efficiency and provides low
impact design by, not only preserving woodlands and wetlands but allowing
substantial areas to be left for buffering to existing neighborhoods.
2. Provides convenient and safe access for vehicles and pedestrians
The proposed development is not anticipated to generate substantial traffic
volumes. The street is a form of public space with defined edges. Together
with the homes they form the character of the neighborhood. The design
provides a walkable, pedestrian friendly neighborhood with strong social
interactions.
3. Provides a buffer of existing vegetation between different uses, adjacent
properties, roadways, and between backyards of back to back lots
Substantial buffers between this development and the existing
neighborhood exist because of the flexibility offered by a P.U.D.. Existing
preserved vegetation to the east provides a buffer to future development
with the large open space shown on our plan that ties into the existing
open space in Miller's Woods allows for a large, unified, ecologically
preserved area for both neighborhoods to enjoy.
4. Preserves existing stands of trees utilizing smaller lot sizes and dimensions
combined with similar lot numbers as a conventional plan allows us to save
significant amount of vegetation. That same afforded flexibility allows us to
incorporate large ecological areas consisting of wetlands and storm water
storage.
Though not specifically mentioned in the City's requirements an exciting
and necessary housing component is being proposed in this development.
All too often, cities offer a lack of lifecycle housing opportunities to its
residents. Market research has shown the Villa proposed addresses a need
shortage of this type of home. This product allows for empty nesters or
couples looking to downsize an alternative for housing not currently
offered in the City. This allows for new residents and existing residents to
stay in the City of Andover keeping the City Vibrant and growing.
In Summary, we respectfully respect feedback and comments on the
concept plan to allow a PUD on this property.
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.AN DOVE RMN.GOV
MEMO/PdND(/M
Z
W
TO: Stephanie Hanson, City Planner
FROM: David Berkowitz, Director of Public Works /City Engineer 0
Jason Law, Asst. City Engineer U
U_
DATE: January 4, 2019 LL
H
REFERENCE: The Villas at Crosstown Woods /PUD Review #1 cn
The following comments are regarding Review #1 of the PUD Submittal:
1. In the narrative, discuss deviation from standard 110' buildability requirement as it
appears multiple lots will not meet this.
2. In the narrative, change required street width from 32' to 33' and the front yard distance to
29.5'.
3. Need to review with the Park Commission if a park is desired in the plat or if park
dedication fees will cover this.
4. In the narrative, discuss if a Homeowner's Association will be in place for maintenance
and upkeep of common areas among other things as lots do not extend to plat lines.
5. Sketch Plan and all applicable sheets: Remove eyebrow cul de sac from northwest corner
of plat. These are undesirable from a maintenance standpoint, in particular snow
plowing.
6. In the City's current Sanitary Sewer model, this property is allocated 43 units. There is an
excess capacity in the current system for 5 additional lots. This plat as submitted is for 48
lots, which would be using the additional 5 lots of capacity in the sewer trunk system.
7. Conceptual Grading Plan: Remove retaining wall and grade out swale on southeast
corner of site to correct drainage issue on Crosstown Boulevard due to limited existing
right of way. Existing wall is not depicted on current plan.
8. Conceptual Grading Plan: Drainage and Utility Easements will be required in all
low /ponding /wetland areas up to the high -water level of the basins or delineated wetland
boundaries as well as 10' either side of all public utilities.
9. Conceptual Grading Plan: Provide Vehicle Maintenance Access easements over pipe
systems into / out of ponds. VMA's shall be graded no steeper than 10:1 and be 20' wide.
10. Conceptual Grading Plan: All retaining walls greater than 3' in exposed height shall be
engineered. Retaining walls shall be the property of the HOA, or parcels they are within.
11. Conceptual Grading Plan: All grades shall be no steeper than 4:1. Review pond slopes.
Provide a 10' bench centered on NWL of all ponds at the NWL.
12. Conceptual Grading Plan: Add a 100' minimum length turn lane for the northbound exit
from the plat at 161St Avenue centered in the ROW.
13. Conceptual Grading Plan: Future trails are identified along Crosstown Boulevard and
161s' Avenue adjacent to the plat. Additional discussion should be had with staff
regarding grading for the future trails with mass grading of this site.
14. Conceptual Grading Plan: Need to model low area in rear yard of southwest corner for
high water level. Preferred option is to grade this to drain and eliminate rear yard storm
sewer.
15. Need to provide highest anticipated water level elevation from geotechnical engineer to
verify structures meet 3' separation requirement from HAWL, or 2' above adjacent basin
HWL, whichever is more restrictive.
16. Need to model pond connection in southeast corner of plat into Miller's Woods. Verify that
there is no increase in basin HWL of Pond JP under proposed conditions.
17. Developer will be required to cover all costs associated with removal of and connection to
existing cul de sacs on south end of plat, including restoration to existing lots
(landscaping, driveways, irrigation, sod, etc).
18.Anoka County Highway Department will need to provide comments and requirements for
what County Road improvements will be required at the connection to Constance Blvd.
19.Anoka County has Constance Blvd. identified as County Road 60 on their designation
map, not CR 20.
20. Please review all City Codes for compliance.
21. Additional comments pending further review.
Note: It is a requirement that the Developer respond to each of these items in writing
digital copy from City and type responses below original comment) when re- submitting
the revised plat to the City. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Jason Law, Assistant
City Engineer at (763) 767 -5130 or David Berkowitz, Director of Public Works /City Engineer at
(763) 767 -5133.
2
Date Created: January 15, 2019
Disclaimer: The provider makes no representation or warranties with respect to the reuse of this data. AERIAL WETLANDS MAP
U)
Z
O
H
Q
w
J
W
J_
>
This plan depicts the proposed
PUD - Single Family Urban
e.�
development - 48 urban lots
CI�. Sac I. .. _
g
106 - -�- — _
W 00
_..... .. 105 J
i I 1 ' LP
ve ai I saved trees I w a.{n iF z
Sa' c' POND N3 I .nn..
NWL -900.0
HWL 9025
\ \\ J S�i 8� ,^ ^• 5 25 0 25 50
SCALE IN FEE
w 11�I
— v e -- aoI 8 LLI
SITE DATA:
\ 33' / / o °� CARLSON (north) - 13-32 -
_ 680 Constance Blvd
4.25 acres
__ CARLSON(south) - 13- 32- kvaA-vvvo
,.,. -. ..,... ...,. .s..
4.73 cres
JI 107
BARTH - 13 -32- 24-32 -0001
Z �': I I -. j I / '� / d 169019 Crosstown Blvd NW
•m•- I -
J'' 9.4 acres
PUD -VILLA LAYOUT (48 Lots)
Z DO Min Width - 53 ft
O U I 7I J fysb - 16 ft from
OW 30 ft from Curb
- - - - ^ sysb -6.5ft/ .5ft
CID irsb
On
O Cnty Road sb - 40'
( I II POND #2
I HWL -901.0
_ 'Ps j77jj j .
� I �
SavQd _- -----------
,e.
Iy �
ees d,trees 3
60 33 II _ I w m'�� sdNed tr —MOST NORTHERLY LINE OF OUTLO'! E MILLERS WOODS { �'� -- 1j I NWL eseO
.... nl r�. r/ ` �ad ] HWL -999.5
102 108 saved yree^' I (4L trees JSj I
7
I I 1. 1 NWL-0BAA
IV 11 IL IL
2
3 2 rmrR-
nq
gi /
W
6
4r` ,
� 4 , � ,.^ NEALAND I
`� -� 5W
2
� a 1000 YR • 0YR -8 995.74
I n.nn �. v
DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS _ - CRY PROJECT N0. FILE NO.
BASE BARTHDWG _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ — — INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WRHOUT PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TI AT I EeRS �M, — VILLA SKETCH PLAN 122618 49168 -M
DRAWN BY SATHRE- BERGOUI3T,INC:s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT AMADULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE P ~� SATHRE - BERGQUIST, INC.
-- - -- ---------- - - - - -- SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES ANILLEGmMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. w6 Ga THE VILLAS AT CROSSTOWN WOODS
RSM — INDEMNIFY SATHRE- BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. ANDOVER, CHECKED BY — -- - -- --------- - - - - -- 15050UR1 BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (852j 4788000 r
-- - -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — SATHRE-RERGOUIST,INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE LANDMARK OF ANDOVER MN, LLC.
>vu< _ USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING ?p MINNESOTA
DATE — -- - -- — ------- - - - - -- FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. Na", PE.
MFRS vtF� X
-- - -- --- ---- --___ - - - -- Dale: U.. N..
Z
J
07
Z
O
W
N
U
60
Q
aCT
ei /. i.
U
33
CONSTANCE BLVD NW
-__
f; 1 - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - -- - -- wg7M�eanm P.a
-------- ._---------------Wetland 02 Impad .
(42361)`--_ - - -- -------- - - - - --
__
� Dili w
I i m
/ —
I I -
------- - - ----
1I ` 7 i
--T
u .�w
,
- - - - - -- _
- - - - -5 -- - - - - --
(I _ 0uge1 W.Ua a3lmpaq
i
1 16' (667 sf)
/
Pact
i
rr I J
—MOST NORTHERLY INE OF UUT E, MILLEiFS -WOODS
60
7
6
� �•
d
A All I ED
g�
2p
IVIIL -L - _I \.;
1
N
MI5 25 0 2D 25���5J0
Q
SCAL•I•F' Vy'
' ^
I
I
3
2
i
1
Ir!
L!
This plan depicts a standard R-4
Single Family Urban development
41 -urban lots
I
I I wr.
11
r
a
U LLLLLLLLLLLl��l1_ _• +.
LL tLLLLtI�ttttt�L
LLLLLLLLLI_1_LL
1' i '` xwLase.a
1 MGWL -aB1A I
{ ! tYR- BBa.71
10 YR -a01lI
T 1W YR -d _ —
] \ r
� -
�OGE' DNR 2 -035W
2 700 YR -3
wwn. r -p_, -. 9614
SITE DATA:
CARLSON (north) - 13 -3:
680 Constance Blvd
4.25 acres
CARLSON (south) - 13- 32 -24 -32 -0003
4.73 acres
BARTH - 13- 32 -24 -32 -0001
169019 Crosstown Blvd NW
9.4 acres
R-4 Zoning - 41 Lots
Min Width - 80 ft
Min Area - 11,400 sf
fysb - 35 ft
sysb - 10 ft (6 ft garage)
crnrsb - 35 ft
rysb - 30 ft
County Road sb - 40'
DRAWING NAME NO. SY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND /OR CONVEYANCE OF 'PREPARED CERTIFY THAT THIS PIJW OR SPECIFICAnON WAS CRY PROJECT NO. FlLE NO.
SASE_BARTH.OWG _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED W ITHOUT PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I R-4 CONCEPT PLAN 122718 ne936sde3
DRAWN BY SATHRE- BERGOUIST,INC.'s IXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WIrriOUT AMADULV REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE - ------------ - - - - -- SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. SATHRE- BERGQUIST, INC.
RSM INDEMNIFY SATHRE- BERGOUI3T ,INC.OFALLRESPONSISILT'. ANDOVER BARTH & CARLSON PARCELS xx CHECKED BY _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 160 SOUTH BROADWAY WAVZATA, MN. 55391 (952j Q68000 — SATHRE- BERGOUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY aaa — USER OR PARTY LEWLLVRESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOS
SESRESULTING MINNESOTA LANDMARK DEVELOPMENT
— -- - -- ---------------
DATE — -- - -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — FROM ILLEGRMATE USE. Nama, P.E. gLERa p`F?
..r —.� Dab: Uc Na. _ _ _
w
m
0
d
Z
g�
2p
NO RTC �
N
MI5 25 0 2D 25���5J0
Q
SCAL•I•F' Vy'
' ^
Z
a
SITE DATA:
CARLSON (north) - 13 -3:
680 Constance Blvd
4.25 acres
CARLSON (south) - 13- 32 -24 -32 -0003
4.73 acres
BARTH - 13- 32 -24 -32 -0001
169019 Crosstown Blvd NW
9.4 acres
R-4 Zoning - 41 Lots
Min Width - 80 ft
Min Area - 11,400 sf
fysb - 35 ft
sysb - 10 ft (6 ft garage)
crnrsb - 35 ft
rysb - 30 ft
County Road sb - 40'
DRAWING NAME NO. SY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND /OR CONVEYANCE OF 'PREPARED CERTIFY THAT THIS PIJW OR SPECIFICAnON WAS CRY PROJECT NO. FlLE NO.
SASE_BARTH.OWG _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED W ITHOUT PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I R-4 CONCEPT PLAN 122718 ne936sde3
DRAWN BY SATHRE- BERGOUIST,INC.'s IXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WIrriOUT AMADULV REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE - ------------ - - - - -- SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. SATHRE- BERGQUIST, INC.
RSM INDEMNIFY SATHRE- BERGOUI3T ,INC.OFALLRESPONSISILT'. ANDOVER BARTH & CARLSON PARCELS xx CHECKED BY _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 160 SOUTH BROADWAY WAVZATA, MN. 55391 (952j Q68000 — SATHRE- BERGOUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY aaa — USER OR PARTY LEWLLVRESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOS
SESRESULTING MINNESOTA LANDMARK DEVELOPMENT
— -- - -- ---------------
DATE — -- - -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — FROM ILLEGRMATE USE. Nama, P.E. gLERa p`F?
..r —.� Dab: Uc Na. _ _ _
w
m
0