HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC - July 17, 20181685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
Regular City Council Meeting — Tuesday, July 17, 2018
Call to Order — 7:00 p.m.
Pledge of Allegiance
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
1. Approval of Minutes (6/26/18 Workshop; 7/3/18 Workshop; 7/3/18 Regular)
Consent Items
2. Approve Payment of Claims — Finance
3. Appoint Election Judges for the Primary Election —Administration
4. Approve Debt Service Payments - Finance
Discussion Items
5. Anoka County Sheriff's Office Monthly Report — Sheriff
6. Public Hearing — Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement — 851 138[1 Avenue NW — Planning
7. Accept Dedication of Drainage and Utility Easement — 851 — 138t1 Avenue NW —Planning
8. Variance Request — 167" Avenue NW/Maniteau Blvd NW — Richard Lehn — Planning
9. Consider City Code amendments to Title 12, Accessory Structures, Uses and Temporary
Structures — Planning
10. Consider Awarding Bid/17-17, Crosstown Blvd. NW Trail (Bunker Lake Blvd. NW to 140t1 Ave. NW) &
18-26, Fire Station #1 Parking Lot Reconstruction—Administration✓Engineering
Staff Items
11. Schedule August EDA Meeting —Administration
12. Administrator's Report —Administration
Mayor/Council Input
Adjournment
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and City Council
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administl
FROM: Michelle Hartner, Deputy City
SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes
DATE: July 17, 2018
INTRODUCTION
The following minutes were provided by TimeSaver, reviewed by Administration and
submitted for City Council approval:
June 26, 2018
July 3, 2018
July 3, 2018
DISCUSSION
The minutes are attached for your review.
Workshop
Workshop
Regular
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to approve the above minutes.
q
s ectfully submitted,
Michelle Hartner
Deputy City Clerk
Attach: Minutes
0
1
2
3
4
5
6 ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING — JUNE 26,20-18
7 MINUTES
8
9
10 The Workshop Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Julie Trude,
11 June 26, 2018, 6:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover,
12 Minnesota.
13
14 Councilmembers present: Mike Knight, Sheri Bukkila, Valerie Holthus and James Goodrich
15 Councilmember absent: None
16 Also present: City Administrator, Jim Dickinson
17 Community Development Director, Joe Danish
18 Public Works Director/City Engineer, David Berkowitz
19 Recreational Facilities Manager, Erick Sutherland
20 Others
21
22
23 DISCUSS POTENTL4L COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION
24
25 Mr. Dickinson explained the City Council is requested to receive an update from 292 Design Group
26 relative to exploring the expansion of the Andover YMCA Community Center. The Council will
27 be asked to provide direction on what components of an expansion should progress to a detailed
28 design.
29
30 Mr. Dickinson stated on December 5, 2017, the City Council approved the 292 Design Group
31 (292) as the architectural firm to provide architectural services to explore expansion of the Andover
32 Community Center/YMCA. The programming, schematic design and project development phase
33 is working toward a decision point date in June 2018 as to what components of an expansion may
34 progress to construction documents.
35
36 Mr. Dickinson stated on February 155, City Staff and 292 held a stakeholder meeting with many of
37 the local sports associations, school officials, Fun Fest representatives and Andover YMCA. On
38 February 12th the City Council and Community Center Advisory Commission was updated on the
39 stakeholder input and the Council & Community Center Advisory Commission provided their
40 goals for the project.
41
42 Mr. Dickinson stated since February, City staff has worked with 292 & RJM to assemble
43 conceptual designs that will address the requests of the stakeholder groups and engage the YMCA
44 on their potential participation in an expansion.
45
46 Mr. Mark Wentzell, 292 Design Group, made a presentation to the Council regarding the
47 Community Center Expansion, showing updated design plans and budget numbers.
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes — June 26, 2018
Page 2
1 Mayor Trude asked if Mr. Wentzell could go through the types of materials that will be used. Mr.
2 Wentzell reviewed the exterior building panels and materials that would be used in the project. He
3 noted it will be similar to what is already in the current building.
4
5 Councilmember Knight asked if Mr. Wentzell was familiar with the St. Michael/Albertville facility
6 because they have a nice walking track above the gym and it is so useful. Mr. Wentzell stated the
7 discussion comes about putting a track around a gym or arena. The gymnasium they have drawn
8 up is too small for a track without impinging upon the basketball courts. They would have to make
9 the gym larger but they do not have an elevator over there and a suspended track has to have an
10 elevator. It is easier and more cost effective for them to put a track around the multipurpose arena.
11 It does mean that it could be sixty degrees in there in the winter and warmer in the summer months.
12
13 Councilmember Holthus did not think there needed to be elevated corners on the track because
14 there are other tracks in other communities that do not have elevated corners. She stated there was
15 discussion about an elevated track when she was on the original Community Center Planning
16 Committee when they were planning the current Community Center but that was one of the items
17 they cut.
18
19 Mr. Sutherland indicated currently people will walk around the current field house when it is not
20 being used. For the users to have a dedicated walking space would be a benefit. He thought it
21 would be a benefit to have a dedicated senior space and walking area as part of the expansion and
22 they would go hand in hand.
23
24 Mayor Trude stated beyond walking could Mr. Sutherland see this being used by people who come
25 for a workout or for kids after school or while hockey events went on. Mr. Sutherland indicated it
26 would be used by many different groups and there is certainly room for growth.
27
28 Councilmember Knight stated whatever they do has to meet the demands of high school kids and
29 senior citizens as well. He noted pickleball has exploded and they need to have courts for that.
30 Mr. Wentzell showed the design for the multi -use space and noted there will be room for pickleball
31 and other court sports in the expanded gym area.
32
33 Mr. Sutherland stated they will need to identify the specific groups and uses and allocate the space
34 accordingly in order to accommodate everyone.
35
36 Mayor Trude stated there is a shortage of ice and the hockey association has come to them to see
37 if they could get an additional sheet of ice but with this being a multi -use facility will it help them
38 out because she could see it being used for soccer and baseball in the spring and summer as well
39 as other sports when needed. Mr. Dickinson stated they would probably cross over to turf use in
40 February for soccer. Once hockey tournaments start, the space will migrate over to turf. Mr.
41 Sutherland stated there was also thought about picking up summer users but in April or May the
42 turf will come out and there will be a concrete floor and can then be used for Community Center
43 programming.
44
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes — June 26, 2018
Page 3
1 Mr. Dickinson stated in the summer when they have the flexible programming open there was
2 thoughts of using this facility but this is not proposed to be an air-conditioned facility so it will
3 probably be warm in the building. Mr. Sutherland stated there is a potential in the summer months
4 to draw more users into the existing ice arena by having camps, tournaments and other events
5 where they could set up dryland training and other activities on the concrete floor. This could also
6 draw in some junior hockey teams from across the country.
7
8 Councilmember Bukkila asked if any down time was factored in to this. Mr. Sutherland stated he
9 figured there will be few hours, less than ten hours a week where the facility will not be used. Mr.
10 Dickinson noted the proformas are put together to be conservative. They are able to program out
11 all of that space.
12
13 There was discussion regarding the multi -use facility and how much the hockey association would
14 need to use it.
15
16 Councilmember Holthus asked if anyone has talked to the Herb Brooks Training Facility about
17 what their schedule looks like in the summer. Mr. Sutherland stated the dryland portion will be
18 used a lot. He stated he has not talked to them but his son is in a program there this summer five
19 days a week and it was his understanding they are programmed from the time they are open until
20 they close, five days a week.
21
22 Mr. Tony Peterson representing the Andover Hockey Association, reviewed the programming at
23 the Super Rink in the summer months with the Council. He understood the hockey program will
24 not have the facility all year long and would like to have dryland training in the City for their high
25 school and youth hockey players. He explained what the hockey association is looking for as far
26 as use of the facility.
27
28 Discussion continued regarding the hockey association and use of the proposed multi -use facility.
29
30 Mayor Trude stated they should discuss the meeting rooms and find out if there are any questions
31 because she has received some questions from seniors asking if they could have a sink and a
32 refrigerator in the senior meeting area for when they have pot lucks. She wondered if the 2,000-
33 foot meeting room off the food court area has a specific use. Mr. Sutherland stated they have
34 talked about having some flexibility with dividing walls to accommodate some smaller groups
35 there.
36
37 Mr. Wentzell stated he thought they needed to work on this a little more in order to get the perfect
38 size for that room and what events it will be used for. He would like to plan the space to
39 accommodate a lot of different uses. This space might be finished a little nicer than just a
40 classroom space. The amenities the Mayor mentioned such as sinks and refrigerators can be easily
41 incorporated into the plan.
42
43 There was discussion regarding the current and proposed meeting rooms and corridors. It was
44 noted there will be no change to the existing food court.
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes — June 26, 2018
Page 4
1 Mayor Trude stated they hoped the schools will be a user of the rooms as well. She thought they
2 needed to have a conversation with the schools again regarding afterschool programs and trying
3 to program activities within the Community Center for the youth.
4
5 Mr. Dickinson updated the Council on his discussion with the YMCA. He stated they are looking
6 at items but do not have any hard costs to share at this point. They are currently not able to discuss
7 their plans openly with the City. He stated they will continue to work with the local YMCA but
8 the Twin Cities YMCA is the entity that makes the major decisions about expansions. He noted
9 Alison Boes was at the meeting. He stated they will continue to work together to bring efficient
10 services to the public within the building.
11
12 Mr. Dickinson stated the YMCA did identify their top needs as fitness space, court space and the
13 need to refresh and keep current the existing facility. If it gets outdated and beat up they start
14 losing their users and their revenue stream goes down and that impacts their ability to remain
15 successful.
16
17 Mr. Dickinson stated another topic that has been discussed and has come into play is the National
18 Sports Center arena that they have available for use. He noted the City put a $250,000 deposit
19 down and the term for when that ends is the first day of January 2026. They need to give them a
20 twenty-four month notice in advance for when they want to stop that agreement with the National
21 Sports Center for that quarter sheet of ice. What they get is a guaranteed 335 prime time hours for
22 the Andover Hockey Association. If the hockey association did not do the minimum they would
23 have to guarantee payment for 215 hours. This has never been an issue and he did not believe it
24 would be an issue going forward.
25
26 Mayor Trude asked if the hockey association would need more ice if they were to get the additional
27 facility built. Mr. Peterson discussed their programming and kids, the more kids that come into
28 the program, the more ice time they will need. He stated they are busting at the seams right now.
29
30 Councilmember Knight asked if they had any social center for seniors or for preschool. Mr.
31 Dickinson stated a part of the mix is they are focusing on seniors and teens with the YMCA and
32 to some extent to the west of the facility, something could also be done there. They are looking
33 for their partnership to continue and expand with the YMCA.
34
35 Mr. Dickinson reviewed the financial information, including the operational costs with the
36 Council.
37
38 Mr. Dickinson stated the more components the better the bottom line is for operations, but it does
39 increase the debt service load to the residents.
40
41 Mayor Trude stated in the past they have collected Capital Contributions so she thought they could
42 publish in their newsletter that contributions are welcome for this addition to the Community
43 Center.
44
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes —June 26, 2018
Page 5
There was discussion regarding what the tax base was and how the expansion would increase
property taxes and by how much per household, approximately.
4 Mayor Trude stated another source of funding could be park dedication money. She stated she
5 asked Mr. Dickinson previously to figure out if there was anything feasible in the park dedication
6 area for indoor recreation. She stated she would entertain a discussion with the Park and
7 Recreation Commission and the Council at a future workshop meeting for a potential park
8 dedication funding source for the multi -use facility.
9
10 Mayor Trude stated they had a lot of snow this past spring where the kids were inside a lot for
11 practices using artificial turf and she thought a multi-purpose facility would be useful for when
12 they cannot practice outdoors. Councilmember Bukkila stated one of the things that came out of
13 a previous task force was recognition that artificial turf wasn't necessary because they had the
14 ability to add outdoor fields to their roster and since the Park and Recreation Commission has had
15 conversations with turf experts to find out what the proper location was for fields and based on the
16 long term they came up with the need for a number of soccer fields or football and lacrosse fields
17 to accommodate the activities. The Council determined that as long as there was the ability to put
18 in additional outdoor fields that was cheaper for them and what the associations felt was prudent.
19
20 Park and Recreation Commissioner Ted Butler stated his recollection from that task force is they
21 were looking at the time at the long-term damage to the grass turf they already have on the fields.
22 They were having difficulty accommodating all of the associations at the time. One of the thoughts
23 was to look at artificial turf. He stated they did also at the time say they needed to keep looking at
24 this issue.
25
26 There was discussion regarding Park and Recreation Commission discussion regarding fields and
27 adding more fields to accommodate the associations that need them.
28
29 Mr. Dickinson reviewed current Community Center updates and repairs needed. He stated the
30 total when added up is approximately $2.5 million. Necessary repairs to the existing facility are
31 approximately $1.5 million.
32
33 Councilmember Bukkila asked if those repair amounts are included in the proposed expansion.
34 Mr. Dickinson stated the repairs would be added to the project and included with the debt.
35
36 Mr. Dickinson stated the Council could be looking at a $20 million bond. If the option was looking
37 at the multi-purpose and additional meeting rooms and defer everything else, they would be
38 looking at approximately a $15 million bond. If they were looking to add just the meeting rooms
39 and field house they would be looking at approximately a $10 million bond. If they were just
40 looking at the meeting rooms and deferred maintenance the approximate amount would be a $5
41 million bond.
42
43 Councilmember Bukkila asked for clarification on what is included in each package. Mr.
44 Dickinson reviewed the costs for each package with the Council indicating each component has a
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes — June 26, 2018
Page 6
range of costs and need further refining.
3 Mayor Trude asked the Andover YMCA Executive Director, Allison Boes if she could give the
4 Council some input on what involvement the YMCA would like to have with the expansion.
5 Mayor Trude said the YMCA reassurance would help the Council's decision. Mr. Dickinson
6 stated he talked with the YMCA Corporate today and they have indicated they would like to partner
7 with the City on new joint space. Their focus is to get fitness, court space and making sure they
8 are updating and that their facility is meeting the needs of their users. Mayor Trude stated that
9 does not answer any of the Council's questions. Mr. Dickinson stated if the YMCA will be adding
10 space there will be parking allocation. He stated at this point in time the YMCA cannot commit
11 to what their expansion will be. They have to go through their Board to discuss and to get a
12 decision before they can go public. Mayor Trude stated they were at all of the meetings in the
13 talks about space during the original building planning. She did not think the numbers were hard
14 numbers if they are potential players. Mr. Dickinson stated he knew they were going to be players
15 but what they could commit to at this time is not known.
16
17 Councilmember Knight requested they take a break. Mayor Trude stated they would recess for
18 ten to fifteen minutes.
19
20 RECESS
21
22 The City Council recessed at 7:53 p.m.
23
24 RECONVENE
25
26 The City Council reconvened at 8:05 p.m.
27
28 DISCUSS POTENTL4L COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION— continued
29
30 Mr. Dickinson stated he did not want the Council to get hung up on specific costs, he really wanted
31 them to focus on the three components and which components they would want to do. He was not
32 sure without refining the design how the component amounts will shake out, the amounts presented
33 at this time are in a range. The amounts could change and if they can get an actual number they
34 will tell the Council what the specific tax impact is. Right now, this is high level estimating to
35 help try to facilitate a decision. He thought what they needed to focus on when looking at the
36 components is the ranges. He would like the Council to determine what components are really
37 needed and what components could be cut out of the expansion discussion, if anything. He stated
38 staff is looking for more direction.
39
40 Mayor Trude stated RJM has been working with staff on this and she wondered why the costs were
41 so high. Mr. Brad Barickman, RJM Construction, stated the ranges are based on a number of
42 different layouts and not just the layouts the Council is seeing this evening. There were versions
43 that were condensed on square footage and the one before the Council is the ultimate layout plan.
44 That price range reflects all of the different layouts.
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes—June 26, 2018
Page 7
Councilmember Knight stated they have to be able to tell the taxpayer what it is going to cost them,
not a range. Mr. Dickinson stated that is correct but until he knows what component the Council
wants to build he cannot give that answer as there are variables if one component goes versus
another.
6 Mr. Barickman stated the lower cost version of the plan eliminated square footage from the one
7 they are currently seeing. The smaller the square footage the lower the cost.
9 Mr. Jim Stiller, realtor, stated he wanted to look at the small return on investment from the realtor
10 side. He stated he went back three years from today and looked at the community boundaries. He
11 reviewed the new construction home sales and existing home sales. He is going off of school
12 district boundary sales. He stated in Andover they have sold 1,171 homes in the last three years
13 in the Andover High School district. The average homes sales have been $307,000 per sale. He
14 reviewed the Andover average sales compared to surrounding communities. He stated they are
15 seeing a lot of people moving into the community solely based on the amenities they have here.
16 All these facets put together make the community what it is. He stated the residents in the Andover
17 community are getting a lot for their investment compared to other communities because of what
18 Andover has for amenities. He stated in his opinion if they keep investing in amenities the
19 community will benefit. If taxes go up anywhere from $118 to $252, in retrospect the resale value
20 and home values will keep increasing to more than compensate for the taxes going up.
21
22 Commissioner Butler stated he hears from people all over the metro area what great amenities
23 Andover has, especially the Community Center. He stated the communities where people want to
24 live and thrive in are communities that have invested in themselves. He thought they had the
25 opportunity here that they had fifteen years ago and took advantage of and now they have the
26 opportunity to take that next step and say to the new families over the next five to ten years that
27 Andover still cares about the residents by making sure it has a passive service to all of the residents
28 from youth to senior.
29
30 Park and Recreation Commissioner Ted Butler stated he is a hockey parent and sometimes he has
31 to go outside of the City for hockey practice. Andover Hockey Association is spending about half
32 of its time outside of the City. As a baseball coach this year his team alone spent $1,800 for indoor
33 space because they did not have any turf available. He stated if they can keep the sports in Andover
34 it will benefit the restaurants in the City and the shopping in the City. He thought this was an
35 opportunity for the City that should be taken.
36
37 Commissioner Butler stated with the expansion they could offer daytime youth camps and offer
38 indoor space for weather events or a combination of outdoor space and indoor space for different
39 sports.
40
41 Mr. Peterson stated he echoed Commissioner Butler's comments. The very reason his family came
42 to Andover was the Community Center, the schools and the open space. The culmination of all
43 three of them were what brought him to Andover. The Community Center is spectacular. There
44 seems to be a flood of young families coming to Andover and looking at what they have and he
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes—June 26, 2018
Page 8
1 thought they had an opportunity here to almost double down on that. He encouraged the Council
2 to go for the opportunity this presents. As far as the Super Rink there is a good chance they will
3 solicit other communities, other associations and other programs to sell more ice. They are getting
4 to the point where they could have to turn youth away because they do not have the capacity to
5 keep all of the kids because there is not enough ice in the community. He stated the sport of hockey
6 is growing and they are trying to accommodate all of the kids. They have practices with two to
7 three teams on the same ice at the same time.
9 Mr. Tony Howard stated he has lived in Andover for a long time. He stated they have high quality
10 homes and a good quality school system. He stated this is taking the next step in being proactive
11 and they are going to see huge growth. He thought they were investing in the future of their
12 community and keeping their housing stock high.
13
14 Ms. Boes stated they are excited to be partners with Andover. She stated as the City moves
15 forward, their goal is to continue to serve the community of Andover. She stated she cannot talk
16 about specific YMCA building components at this time.
17
18 Councilmember Goodrich stated he wanted to stick to the purpose of the question on the table. He
19 stated there is one non -user group that is largely under represented and that is the resident who
20 will not be using the facility but will still be paying for it. This is not only going to be paid for by
21 the users, it will be paid for by everyone in the City. He wanted to make sure that was a big part
22 of his decision. He explained how he came around with his decision and his philosophy of being
23 a Councilmember. He thought this project was very expensive and did not benefit everyone in the
24 community. He stated they will be asking the entire community to pay for this expansion even if
25 they will not use it. He wanted to make sure the citizens of Andover understood that they are
26 currently on the hook for the current Community Center debt until 2031. They will be paying for
27 that in addition to what could potentially be coming down the road. He indicated he was having a
28 difficult time being societies engineer where he is going to take resources and give them to one set
29 of activities for children or adults at the expense of other children's and adults activities. He noted
30 he had a hard time doing that. He thought all of the arguments have been made. He would like to
31 put this item to a referendum note. They will be having a mid-term election in November which
32 will give them time to get the information out to the community and they can then let the residents
33 vote to determine what should be done. He would be in favor of that.
34
35 Councilmember Holthus stated she was on the task force for the original Community Center and
36 also on the fundraising committee to get funds pledged to build the Community Center and she
37 remembered originally when Mr. Howard and herself were on those committees and they worked
38 long and hard to get the Community Center off the ground. She stated the Community Center has
39 been such a plus for their City. She stated she is interested in spending money to design the plans
40 and then decide what options they should move forward with. She stated on the west side with the
41 meeting rooms if that lobby could be a little smaller they could save some money on square footage
42 and the meeting room could also be a little smaller as well to save money. The other component
43 she thought was important was on the east side to have a teen center. She thought a teen center
44 was very important because being next to a school, when it lets out for the day the kids do not have
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes —June 26, 2018
Page 9
1 anywhere to go and will end up going somewhere and doing something. Kids have always been
2 her number one priority. She is dedicated to having things available for teens. They could share
3 the common area with the seniors.
4
5 Councilmember Knight thought Andover was very unique in a lot of ways and their Community
6 Center combined with a YMCA is being looked at all over the country because it is working very
7 well. He stated what they are seeing in Andover today is two issues, the senior citizens are a large
8 number and they have their needs and wants and the teenagers which are another factor. They
9 need to try to provide something for both of those groups. He would be strongly in favor of a teen
10 center and senior center.
11
12 Councilmember Bukkila stated they were looking at amenities for residents of the City. They were
13 looking at what was currently out there and what needed to be added. She stated one thing they
14 noticed is there is nothing for the preteen group and she was looking at a teen center. She thought
15 that would fill the gap. It would also be a place for the non -athlete to hang out and do their activity.
16 They have parks, trails and fields for the athletes but not really anything for the non -athlete. She
17 was looking at this to fill a need. She stated she is not comfortable with this in its entirety. She is
18 not comfortable with the field house. She is ok with the teen and senior centers because they fill
19 gaps.
20
21 Councilmember Knight stated one of the other things that has grown in the last couple of years is
22 girls' athletics and girls' hockey.
23
24 Mayor Trude stated one of their highest priority goals is to ensure City Services, to keep pace with
25 the City's growing and changing population and she thought they have done a great job with
26 extending their services in the parks. They have added thousands of people and at least a couple
27 thousand homes and girls' hockey has just barely started and they already have a gold medalist
28 girls hockey player and she feels people will be happy to hear that they will provide local ice so
29 the girls can have time on the ice in the City. She stated their City does not have two sheets of ice
30 like other cities and only a quarter ice at the Super Rink. She stated she supported the extra sheet
31 with the multi-purpose space and loved the opportunities and options it provides for spring sports.
32 The only part of this she is not comfortable moving forward with is the gym. She would like to
33 see the drawings move forward but pare down the gymnasium. She would like them to discuss
34 with the School District programs that could be provided to the youth. She would like to see plans
35 with one or two open spaces and for the budget to come in close to $12 million. She would also
36 like to see the Park and Recreation Commission review the park dedication and see if there could
37 be some money dedicated for this project. She thought the Community Center is a strong
38 community amenity. She thought keeping kids active and out of trouble is important. They do
39 not provide a recreation program, they are very low taxed and have a very efficient staff. She
40 thought they were ready to move ahead with some more drawings and pricing.
41
42 The Council further discussed how staff should move forward in getting the Council information.
43
44 Councilmember Goodrich stated he supported designing the whole expansion but the decision to
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes—June 26, 2018
Page 10
1 finally pull the trigger needs to be decided by everybody because it is going to be paid for by so
2 many people that are not going to use this. Councilmember Bukkila noted that there are still
3 residents upset with having to pay for the initial build of the Community Center because they do
4 not use it.
5
6 Mayor Trude indicated she would not support a referendum.
7
8 There was further discussion on what the Council would like to see with the expansion plan.
9 Mayor Trude stated she wanted to stick with $12 million maximum.
10
11 The Council agreed to move forward with design/development plans for review.
12
13 AMY20I8BUDGET PROGRESS REPORT
14
15 Mr. Dickinson indicated this item is informational only and if the Council has questions to contact
16 him.
17
18 MAY20I8CITY INVESTMENTS REVIEW
19
20 Mr. Dickinson indicated this item is informational only and if the Council has questions to contact
21 him.
22
23 OTHER TOPICS
24
25 None.
26
27 ADJOURNMENT
28
29 Motion by Knight, Seconded by Bukkila, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting
30 adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
31
32
33 Respectfully Submitted,
34
35
36 Sue Osbeck, Recording Secretary
37 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
38
1
2
3
4
5
6 ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING— JULY3, 2018
7 MINUTES
8
9
10 The Workshop Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Julie Trude,
11 July 3, 2018, 6:07 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover,
12 Minnesota.
13
14 Councilmembers present: Mike Knight, Valerie Holthus (arrived at 6:38 p.m.), and James
15 Goodrich
16 Councilmember absent: Sheri Bukkila
17 Also present: City Administrator, Jim Dickinson
18 Community Development Director, Joe Janish -
19 Others
20
21
22 DISCUSS SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) FUNDINGIANOKA COUNTY
23 HIGHWAYDEPT.
24
25 Mr. Dickinson explained the Anoka County Highway Department will be applying for two STP
26 Federal Funding projects in Andover for the upcoming solicitation. The two projects are Round
27 Lake Boulevard (CSAR 9) from 150th Lane to 157th Lane and 7th Avenue (CSAH 7) from north of
28 Bunker Lake Boulevard to 157th Avenue.,>
29
30 Mr. Joe McPherson and Mr. Jack Forseland, Anoka County Highway Department, made a
31 presentation regarding the two STP applications for projects in Andover.
32
33 Round Lake Boulevard (CSAH 9) from 150th Lane to 157' Lane
34
35 Councilmember Goodrich asked if there were any traffic counts for the area. Mr. McPherson
36 indicated they did have them but he did not give count information to the Council.
37
38 There was discussion about access onto and off of Round Lake Boulevard by the 7th Day Advent
39 Church.
40
41 Mr. McPherson reviewed Round Lake Boulevard by the vegetable farm and changes to the
42 roadway and access.
43
44 Mayor Trude thought the farm business has a lot of deliveries and people coming and going so
45 she would hate to cut off or limit access to their entrance. Mr. McPherson stated if the farm were
46 ever to develop they would likely want to realign the roads. Mayor Trude stated the road by the
47 farm will be very busy if the area develops.
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes — July 3, 2018
Page 2
1 Mr. McPherson stated there are two options that could be done to the roadway by the farm. He
2 explained there could be a three-quarter access or they could allow full access for the farm.
3 Mayor Trude stated she would like to have full access for that area of the road to allow for the
4 big trucks coming and going to the farm.
6 Mayor Trude did not think they will get a lot of people against this plan. They might get a lot of
7 people at the public hearing just to make comments and hear what is going to happen to the road.
8
9 7`h Avenue (CSAH 7) from north of Bunker Lake Boulevard to 157`4 Avenue.
10
11 Mr. McPherson stated this road is at a volume where it is ready for a four -lane expansion. He
12 reviewed the roadway from Bunker Lake Boulevard going north.
13
14 Mr. McPherson stated they have received a lot of complaints from residents who can't make a
15 left turn coming out onto 7`h Avenue. He noted they are planning to not allow left turns where
16 the area is busy and to direct them to full or controlled intersections.
17
18 Councilmember Holthus arrived at 6:38 p.m.
19
20 Mr. McPherson reviewed the plans with Councilmember Holthus.
21
22 OTHER BUSINESS
23
24 There was none.
25
26 ADJOURNMENT
27
28 Motion by Knight, Seconded by Goodrich, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting
29 adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
30
31 Respectfully Submitted,
32
33
34 Sue Osbeck, Recording Secretary
35 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
36
1
2
3
4
5
6 REGULAR ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL MEETING —JULY 3, 2018
7 MINUTES
8
9
10
11 The Regular Bi -Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Julie
12 Trude, July 3, 2018, 7:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall; 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW,
13 Andover, Minnesota.
14
15 Councilmembers present: Mike Knight, Valerie Holthus and James Goodrich
16 Councilmember absent: Sheri Bukkila
17 Also present: City Administrator, Jim Dickinson
18 Community Development Director, Joe Janish
19 City Attorney, Scott Baumgartner'
20 Others
21
22
23 PLEDGE OFALLEGIANCE
24
25 RESIDENTFORUM
26
27 No one was in the audience that wished to speak to the Council.
28
29 AGENDA APPROVAL
30
31 Mayor Trude indicated there is a change in the agenda to "trade out purchase agreements" for Item
32 #4 and make minor modifications, but it would be the same topic.
33
34 Motion by Holthus, Seconded by Knight, to approve the Agenda as amended above. Motion
35 carried unanimously.
36
37 APPROVAL OFMINUTES
38
39 June 19, 2018, Regular Meeting: Correct as amended.
40
41 Councilmember Holthus requested a correction on page 8, line 28 to indicate that only one of the
42 lots would be congested. She was comfortable with Lots 9 and 10. Mayor Trude suggested
43 deleting the reference to Lots 9 and 10 from the minutes referencing the congestion. The minutes
44 should read something like; "the part of the plat that she sees as very congested would be Lots 15-
45 17 and she suggested that they take out one of those lots and move all of the lot lines to make all
46 of the lots on that side of the street slightly larger."
47
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes — July 3, 2018
Page 2
1 Mayor Trude requested a correction on page 4, line 22, to replace the term "credit card" with "gift
2 card." She also requested a correction on page 10, line 23, to change the spelling of Patrick
3 Popehn's name as indicated.
4
5 Motion by Holthus, Seconded by Knight, to approve the minutes as amended. Motion carried
6 unanimously.
7
8 CONSENT ITEMS
9
10 Item 2 Approve Payment of Claims
1 I Item 3 Approve Resolution/Request MnDOT to Conduct Speed Study/l68`h Lane NW (Between
12 Round Lake Blvd NW & Verdin Street NW)(See Resolution R045-18)
13 Item 4 Approve Purchase Agreement/15127 Nightingale St. NW
14
15 Motion by Knight, Seconded by Goodrich, approval of the Consent Agenda as read. Motion
16 carried unanimously.
17
18 PUBLIC HEARING — VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT — C & W
19 FAMILY FARM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
20
21 Mr. Janish addressed the public by stating that as a part of the Winslow Woods 2nd Addition plat,
22 the C & W Family Farm Limited Partnership granted a drainage and utility easement over a
23 portion of land used for the storm water ponding. The easement was not part of the Winslow
24 Woods 2nd Addition plat.
25
26 As part of the Winslow Cove plat, the drainage and utility easement increased in size; therefore,
27 the existing easement must be vacated. There will be two (2) new easements granted to the City;
28 a
29 new easement will be dedicated to encompass the drainage and utility area (storm water ponding)
30 and an easement for right-of-way, trail, and drainage and utility for the future connection of
31 Xeon Street to 150`h Lane.
32
33 Motion by Holthus, Seconded by Knight, to open the public hearing at 7:07 p.m. Motion carried
34 unanimously.
35
36 There was no one present who wished to address the Council.
37
38 Motion by Holthus, Seconded by Knight, to close the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. Motion carried
39 unanimously.
40
41 There was no further discussion.
42
43 Motion by Knight, Seconded by Goodrich, to approve Resolution No. R046-18, to approve the
44 vacation of drainage and utility easement — C & W Family Farm Limited Partnership. Motion
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes —July 3, 2018
Page 3
1 carried unanimously.
2
3 ACCEPT EASEMENTS FOR ROADWAY, TRAIL, AND DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
4 PURPOSES—C& WFAMILYFARMLIMITEDPARTNERSHIP
6 Mr. Janish stated on June 19, 2018, the City Council approved the final plat for Winslow Cove.
7 As part of the plat, an easement for the extension of Xeon Street to the south would be required
8 to be dedicated and a drainage and utility easement would be needed to encompass the storm
9 water ponding to allow the City maintenance access. The Quit Claim Deeds have been approved
10 by the City Attorney.
11
12 Motion by Holthus, Seconded by Goodrich, to approve the easements and approve each of the
13 Quit Claim Deeds. Motion carried unanimously.
14
15 CONSIDER REFUSE/RECYCLER LICENSE RENEWALILEPAGE & SONS
16
17 Mr. Dickinson noted the hauler LePage & Sons, has applied for renewal of their license. This
18 item was tabled from June. Staff has been in contact with LePage & Sons relative to resident
19 complaints about missing weekly pick-ups in May. The company was behind for a couple of
20 weeks in the beginning of May but has since been back on schedule and there have been no
21 recent complaints over the past couple of weeks to the City offices. The company had all trucks
22 pass inspections by City mechanics. The license period will be from July 4, 2018 through May
23 31, 2019.
24
25 Mayor Trude asked that LePage representatives get back to City residents so that they are not
26 calling her with concerns. She indicated she had five people contact her privately in the last
27 week with concerns about the hauler. She also noted trash and recycling had been co -mingled
28 and that a hauler had recklessly knocked over trash cans with a truck. The representative that
29 was present agreed to call back all customers.
30
31 Motion by Knight, Seconded by Holthus, to renew the refuse/recycler license for LePage & Sons.
32 Motion carried unanimously.
33
34 SCHEDULE AUGUST WORKSHOP
35
36 Mr. Dickinson requested the Council schedule a Workshop Meeting to discuss topics as detailed
37 in the staff report.
38
39 The Council discussed the draft agenda and available dates.
40
41 Motion by Holthus, Seconded by Goodrich, to schedule a Workshop Meeting on August 28, 2018,
42 at 6:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
43
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes —July 3, 2018
Page 4
1 ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
2
3 City Staff updated the Council on the administration and city department activities, legislative
4 updates, updates on development/CIP projects, and meeting reminders/community events.
5
6 (City Administrator) Mr. Dickinson announced that Andover Family Fun Fest is being held on
7 July 131h and 14`h. The City will have a booth where individuals in the community can talk to staff,
8 the Council and Commissioners. Another item he has been working on is the WDE clean-up
9 project. There is a meeting with the MPCA in 2-3 weeks regarding the communication plan, as
10 the project moves forward. The engineers are at 60% in the design phase. The entire excavation
11 project will take place within the structure that will be built. It will start with site preparation
12 temporary building construction and then the excavation/removal will take place in January or
13 February. If residents have seen action at the pit, it is to extract equipment that is no longer in use,
14 equipment that was previously used to extract fluids from the pit. It was no longer effective, so
15 the equipment is being removed.
16
17 (Community Development) Mr. Janish indicated he was at a recent conference and learned about
18 housing and labor shortages in Minnesota, as well as daycare shortages and e-commerce. There
19 have been ongoing meetings regarding residential and commercial projects, and staff has been
20 working on commercial site plans for smaller projects.
21
22 AIA YORICO UNCIL INPUT
23
24 (Mayor Trude) The Council had a workshop earlier in the evening and learned about County
25 grants being applied for to make road upgrades. It would be advantageous to be able to add trails
26 in the more rural areas.
27
28 Mayor Trude reminded residents about the upcoming Andover Family Fun Fest on July 13"h and
29 14'. There will be no Council meetings that week as staff and Councilmembers will be seeing
30 residents at the booth or parade. Maddie Rooney will be the parade Grand Marshall. A list of
31 activities can be found online.
32
33 ADJOURNMENT
34
35 Motion by Holthus, Seconded by Knight, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting
36 adjourned at 7:28 p.m.
37
38
39 Respectfully submitted,
40
41 Marlene White, Recording Secretary
42
REGULAR ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES — JULY3, 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.........................................................................................................
1
RESIDENTFORUM......................................................................................................................
1
AGENDAAPPROVAL..................................................................................................................
1
APPROVALOF MINUTES...........................................................................................................
I
CONSENTITEMS.........................................................................................................................
2
Item 2 Approve Payment of Claims.........................................................................................
2
Item 3 Approve Resolution/Request MnDOT to Conduct Speed Study/168th Lane NW
(Between Round Lake Blvd NW & Verdin Street NW)(R045-18)...................................
2
Item 4 Approve Purchase Agreement/ 15127 Nightingale: St. NW ..........................................
2
PUBLIC HEARING — VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT — C & W
FAMILY FARM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (R046-18) .........................................................
2
ACCEPT EASEMENTS FOR RAODWAY, TRAIL, AND DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
PURPOSES — C & W FAMILY FARM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP .......................................
3
CONSIDER REFUSE/RECYCLER LICENSE RENEWAL/LEPAGE & SONS .........................
3
SCHEDULE AUGUST WORKSHOP...... ........`. ........ ......... ...............................
3
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT ......................... ......... ......... ......... .................
4
(City Administrator) ................ ......... .......................................................................
4
(Community Development) .... ......... ....... ........i ...............................................
4
MAYOR/COUNCIL INPUT..............................!..................................................................
4
(Mayor Trude).......... ......... ......... ......... .............:.........................................
4
ADJOURNMENT ........ ......... ......... .....: a. ........................................................
4
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administral
FROM: Lee Brezinka, Finance Manager
SUBJECT: Payment of Claims
DATE: July 17, 2018
INTRODUCTION
Attached are disbursement edit lists for claims related to the on going business of the City of Andover.
a
DISCUSSION
Claims totaling $81,906.75 on disbursement edit lists #1— 42 from 07/06/18 to 07/12/18 have been issued and
released.
Claims totaling $309,818.90 on disbursement edit list #3 dated 07/17/18 will be issued and released upon
approval.
BUDGET IMPACT
The edit lists consist of routine payments with expenses being charged to various department budgets and
projects.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Andover City Council is requested to approve total claims in the amount of $391,725.65. Please note that
Council Meeting minutes will be used as documented approval.
Respectfully ubmitted,
Lee Brezinka
Attachments: Check Proof Lists
Accounts Payable
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
User: BrendaF
Printed: 07/09/2018 - 11:57AM
Batch: 00409.07.2018
Invoice No
Description
Vendor:
4AcePmd
4 Ace Productions
Be Aware, Be Alert, Be Safe
ACE Enabled:
False
Check Total:
Vendor:
BaniaDon
Don Banda Jr.
395.00
Safety Camp - Kids Summer Safety Series
Check Total:
Vendor:
CLIMBTha
CLIMB Theatre Inc
ACH Enabled:
False
Safety Camp - Bullying & Self Control
07/06/2018
0101-00000-24210
Check Total:
Vendor:
WiebRich
Rich Wieber
8026
Safety Camp Bicycle Stunt Show
Check Total:
Vendor:
XavisPrp
Xavis Properties, LLC
07/06/2018
0101-00000-24210
Crosstown Blvd Trail
900.00
Check Total:
Total for Check Run:
Total of Number of Checks:
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/09/2018 - 11:57 AM)
- CITY 0
Amount
Payment Date
Acer Number
Reference
Check Sequence: 1
ACE Enabled:
False
395.00
07/06/2018
0101-00000-24210
395.00
Check Sequence: 2
ACH Enabled:
False
250.00
07/06/2018
0101-00000-24210
250.00
Check Sequence: 3
ACH Enabled:
False
900.00
07/06/2018
0101-00000-24210
900.00
Check Sequence: 4
ACH Enabled:
False
375.00
07/06/2018
0101-00000-24210
375.00
Check Sequence: 5
ACH Enabled:
False
4,278.00
07/06/2018
4170-49300-63005
4,278.00
6,198.00
5
Page 1
Accounts Payable
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor ] CITY Y a 1T
User: BrendaF „II//�I
Printed: 07/12/2018 - 3:16PM
Batch: 00410.07.2018
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor: Connexl Connexus Energy
Check Sequence: 1
ACH Enabled: False
Siren 43 - 16860 Roanoke St. NW
5.00
07/12/2018
010142400-62005
386026-300407
Siren #4 - 158th & Dakota St. NW
5.00
07/12/2018
0101-42400-62005
386026-300408
Hawkridge Park- Service #2
140.32
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-301889
Chesterton Connnons Pk -Security
7.66
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-301899
Country Oaks W Pk -Security
7.66
07/12/2018
010145000-62005
386026-301901
CH Campus Outdoor Hockey Rinks
21.49
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-302015
15700 7th St. - Traffic Signal
14.92
07/12/2018
0101-43500-62005
386026-275108
Timber Trails Park
125.61
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-308418
Altitude Control Vault
18.95
07/12/2018
5100-48100-62005
386026-303716
EDAReader Board
15.27
07/12/2018
2110-46500-62005
386026-303870
Hills Bunker Lk W Pk Sec Light
7.66
07/12/2018
010145000-62005
386026-294591
13711 Crosstown Blvd NW
61.32
07/12/2018
211046500-62005
386026-303295
Sports Complex -3535161st Ave
1,581.99
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-304108
Signal & Lights - 16119 Hanson
71.20
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-305951
Recycling Center
37.61
07/12/2018
0101-46000-62005
386026-304690
Round Lake & 136th
3.73
07/12/2018
0101-43500-62005
386026-201283
Round Lake & 135th
3.73
07/12/2018
0101-43500-62005
386026-201284
County Road 9 & 116
16.79
07/12/2018
010143500-62005
386026-201749
Round Lake & 138th
11.92
07/12/2018
0101-43500-62005
386026-201751
Bunker & Hanson
14.92
07/12/2018
010143500-62005
386026-203068
Round Lake 140th
14.92
07/12/2018
0101-43500-62005
386026-201777
Bunker Lake & Heather
17.88
07/12/2018
0101-43500-62005
386026-251490
Banker Lake & Rose St
11.92
07/12/2018
0101-43500-62005
386026-251491
Bunker Lake & Jay
23.84
07/12/2018
0101-43500-62005
386026-251653
Signal Bunker & Crosstown
23.84
07/12/2018
0101-43500-62005
386026-251654
Signal Andover&Crosstown
23.84
07/12/2018
0101-43500-62005
386026-266238
Signal 1600 Crosstown
23.84
07/12/2018
0101-43500-62005
386026-269010
Signal - 14298 Round Lake
11.92
07/12/2018
010143500-62005
386026-279219
Signal 15390 Hanson Blvd
14.92
07/12/2018
0101-43500-62005
386026-287969
Signal 15698 Round Lake Blvd
14.92
07/12/2018
010143500-62005
386026-290712
Signal 13976 Hanson BLvd
14.92
07/12/2018
01014350052005
386026-298781
Shady Knoll Pk -Security Light
7.66
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-304218
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/12/2018 - 3:16 PM) Page 1
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Crooked Lk Elementary Rink
41.50
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-306807
Wash Station -Public Works
31.00
07/12/2018
0101-41930-62005
386026-308646
Andover Lions Park - Irrig
16.83
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-310295
580 Bunker Lk Blvd -Tunnel Lts
3938
07/12/2018
0101-43500-62005
386026-310043
961 Bunker Lk Blvd - Signal
61.56
07/122018
0101-43400-62005
386026-310044
Bunker Lake & Crosstown - Signal
57.12
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-251654
Lift Station #4
184.58
07/12/2018
5200-48200-62005
386026-251905
Signal 1594 Andover Blvd
14.92
07/122018
0101-43500-62005
386026-284894
Pumphouse 97
175.02
07/12/2018
510048100-62005
386026-255064
13551 Jay Street - Lights
122.44
07/122018
2110-00000-11310
386026-255962
Martin & Commercial - Lights
191.43
07/12/2018
2110-00000-11310
386026-255963
Lift Station#6
63.21
07/122018
520048200-62005
386026-275284
Prairie Knoll Park
489.24
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-275569
Lift Station#7
32.90
07/12/2018
5200-48200-62005
386026-276742
TImber Trail Park Security Lights
9.01
07/122018
0101-45000-62005
386026-277955
Fire Station#3
477.10
07/122018
0101-41920-62005
386026-279236
Community Center
19,346.37
07/122018
2130-44000-62005
386026-281212
Lift Station #8
62.96
07/122018
5200-48200-62005
386026-281840
13914 Prairie Road -Signal
54.34
07/122018
0101-43400-62005
386026-282927
Andover Blvd & Hanson - Signal
34.04
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-284894
Pine Hills Park
7.66
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-256788
Hidden Creek North Park
34.68
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-261455
Shadowbrook East Park
43.48
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-267140
City Hall Park Lighting
28.82
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-268970
1600 Crosstown Blvd - Signal
41.90
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-269010
2139 Bunker Lake- Signal
71.33
07/12/2018
0101-00000-11310
386026-269011
Terrace Park -Security Lights
7.66
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-270409
Eveland Field -Security Lights
7.66
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-270410
Wild Iris Park -Security Lights
7.66
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-270411
Strootman Park -Security Lights
7.66
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-270412
Water Treatment Plant
14,701.00
07/12/2018
510OA8100-62005
386026-271472
Sunshine Park - Electric
78.34
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-273153
Pumphouse #8
1,893.38
07/12/2018
5100-48100-62005
386026-273808
157007th Ave - Signal
42.80
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-275108
Fire Station #1
779.60
07/12/2018
0101-41920-62005
386026-68989
Lift Station #5
29.48
07/12/2018
5200-48200-62005
386026-273019
Community Center Concession Stand
598.34
07/12/2018
2130-44100-62005
386026-281212
Red Oaks W Pk -Security Light
7.66
07/12/2018
0101-05000-62005
386026-246005
Lift Station#2
52.06
07/12/2018
5200-48200-62005
386026-250066
Lift Station #3
66.13
07/12/2018
5200-48200-62005
386026-250421
Northwood E Pk -Security Light
7.66
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-250587
Bunker Lake & Heather St - Signal
47.24
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-251490
Bunker Lake & Rose St - Signal
52.30
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-251491
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/12/2018 - 3:16 PM) Page 2
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Bunker Lake & Jay St- Signal
52.94
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-251653
Signal 15390 Hanson Blvd
3823
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-287969
1157 Andover Blvd - Well #9
4,566.98
07/12/2018
5100-48100-62005
386026-286880
Signal 15698 Rd Lk Blvd
36.58
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-290712
Lift Station #9
36.45
07/12/2018
5200AS200-62005
386026-287602
Country Oaks Park
5.00
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-289790
Round Lake & 136th - Signal
26.46
07/12/2018
0101-00000-13201
386026-201283
Round Lake &135th -Signal
21.40
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-201284
Round Lake & 135th - Signal
25.13
07/12/2018
0101-00000-13201
386026-201284
County Road 9 & 116 - Signal
40.07
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-201749
County Road 9 & 116 - Signal
18.96
07/12/2018
0101-00000-13201
386026-201749
Pumphouse#4
1,497.11
07/12/2018
5100-48100-62005
386026-231280
City Hall Garage
19.85
07/12/2018
0101-41960-62005
386026-231281
Tower#2
26.18
07/12/2018
5100-48100-62005
386026-231282
Pumphouse #5
2,015.53
07/12/2018
5100-48100-62005
386026-237118
Hidden Creek E Pk -Sec Lightl
7.66
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-238967
Pleasant Oaks -Security Light
7.66
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-238968
Pumphouse #6
1,922.09
07/12/2018
510048100-62005
386026-245409
Kelsey/Rd Lk Pk -Security Light
7.66
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-246004
Round Lake &161st -Signal
45.46
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-230276
Hawkridge Park -Security Light
40.22
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-230286
Sunshine Park
3,504.50
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-230685
City Hall - Light
1,749.91
07/12/2018
0101-41910-62005
386026-231135
Round Lake & 138th - Signal
41.27
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-201751
Pumphouse 41
51.29
07/12/2018
5100-48100-62005
386026-201767
Round Lake & 140th - Signal
39.25
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-201777
North Woods West Park
18.07
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-201868
Hanson & 138th Lane
17.81
07/12/2018
5300-48300-62005
386026-202678
Bunker&Hanson - Signal
52.30
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-203068
Pumphouse #3
47.74
07/12/2018
5100-48100-62005
386026-203069
Prairie Knoll Park
32.05
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-175813
Creekview Crossing Park
7.66
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-175877
County Rd Intersect Lights
2,358.54
07/12/2018
0101-43500-62005
386026-176059
Subdivision Interior Street Lt
9,70426
07/12/2018
0101-43600-62005
386026-176201
Tower#1
100.38
07/12/2018
5100-48100-62005
386026-178452
Fire Station#2
383.69
07/12/2018
0101-41920-62005
386026-178835
Lift Station #1
99.23
07/12/2018
5200-48200-62005
386026-178836
Pumphouse #2
173.23
07/12/2018
5100-48100-62005
386026-201125
Round Lake & 136th - Signal
22.73 -
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-201283
14298 Round Lake- Signal
35.70
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-279219
Andover Station North Ballfld
1,084.19
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-292904
Andover St Bailfield Lights
24.98
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-292904
Andover St N Ballfield Lights
37.47
07/12/2018
0101-43500-62005
386026-292034
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/12/2018 - 3:16 PK Page 3
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Public Works
2,073.87
07/12/2018
0101-41930-62005
386026-159276
Langseth Park
7.66
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-174273
Hidden Creek North Park
15.32
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-174280
Fox Meadows Park
127.44
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-310245
Nordeens Park
7.72
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-175703
Electric Service
14.92
07/12/2018
0101-43500-62005
386026-230276
Wayside Hom - 1000 Crosstown Blvd.
21.62
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-299229
Control Valve Vault
21.74
07/12/2018
5100-48100-62005
386026-201816
Signal - Crosstown & Andover Blvd.
41.90
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-266238
Andover Station H- Lights
249.75
07/12/2018
2110-00000-11310
386026-295855
1019 Andover Blvd - Wayside Horn
23.27
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-297583
Crooked Lake Boat Shelter
14.64
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-298796
Signal - 13976 Hanson Blvd. NW
38.99
07/12/2018
0101-43400-62005
386026-298781
Oak Bluff Park -Security Light
40.46
07/12/2018
0101-45000-62005
386026-299378
Bus Sign - 1721 Bunker Lk Blvd
20.99
07/12/2018
2110-00000-11310
386026-299532
Bus Sign - 13980 Hanson Blvd
1705
07/12/2018
2110-00000-11310
386026-299533
ASN Street Lights
225.32
07/12/2018
2110-00000-11310
386026-299989
Siren #5-2748 161 stAve NW
5.00
07/12/2018
0101-42400-62005
386026-300397
Siren #12 - Bunker & Marigold St. NW
5.00
07/12/2018
0101-42400-62005
386026-300398
Siren 410 - 145th & Vintage St. NW
5.00
07/12/2018
0101-42400-62005
386026-300399
Siren #11 - 138th Lane & Drake St. NW
5.00
07/12/2018
0101-42400-62005
386026-300400
Siren #6 - 16050 Constance Blvd. NW
5.00
07/12/2018
0101-42400-62005
386026-300401
Siren #8 - 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
5.00
07/12/2018
0101-42400-62005
386026-300402
Siren #2 - 174th & Round Lake Blvd. NW
5.00
07/12/2018
0101-42400-62005
386026-300403
Siren #9 - 139th & Crosstown Blvd. NW
5.00
07/12/2018
0101-42400-62005
386026-300404
Siren #7 - Andover Blvd. & Prairie Road
5.00
07/12/2018
0101-42400-62005
386026-300405
Siren #1 - 176th & Ward Lake Drive NW
5.00
07/12/2018
0101-42400-62005
386026-300406
2526138th Ave NW
16.41
07/12/2018
4520-49300-62005
386026-300407
2543 Bunker Lake Blvd
29.22
07/12/2018
452049300-62005
386026-300407
2557 Bunker Lake Blvd
24.59
07/12/2018
4520-49300-62005
386026-300407
2526138th Ave NW #2
13.50
07/12/2018
4520-49300-62005
386026-300407
2526138th Ave NW#3
34.43
07/12/2018
452049300-62005
386026-300407
2526138th Ave NW#1
15.78
07/12/2018
4520-49300-62005
386026-300407
2526138th Ave NW 94
21.67
07/12/2018
4520-49300-62005
386026-300407
Check Total: 75,708.75
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/12/2018 - 3:16 PM) Page 4
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Total for Check Run: 75,708.75
Total of Number of Checks:
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/12/2018 - 316 PM) Page 5
Accounts Payable
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
User: BrendaF
Printed: 07/12/2018 - 1:40PM
Batch: 00417.07.2018
Invoice No Description
Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:
292Desig
292 Design Group, Inc.
Check Sequence: 1
ACH Enabled:
False
17102.00-3
Community Center Expansion
28,680.70
07/17/2018
4180-49300-63005
Check Total:
28,680.70
Vendor:
ArborOak
Arbor Oaks Senior Living, LLC
Check Sequence: 2
ACH Enabled:
False
July 2018 TIF W9
3,501.62
07/17/2018
4515-49300-63005
July 2018 TIF W9
-3,501.62
07/17/2018
2110-46500-54370
July 2018 TIF W9
31,514.62
07/17/2018
4515-49300-63010
Check Total:
31,514.62
Vendor:
ColumHei
City of Columbia Heights
Check Sequence: 3
ACH Enabled:
False
2018 GIS 2nd Qtr
2,775.00
07/17/2018
4140-49300-63005
2018 GIs 2nd Qtr
1,902.00
07/17/2018
2210-41600-63005
2018 GIS 2nd Qtr
185.00
07/17/2018
2220-41600-63005
2018 GIS 2nd Qtr
2,642.00
07/17/2018
2250-41600-63005
2018 GIs 2nd Qtr
2,774.00
07/17/2018
510048100-63005
2018 GIS 2nd Qtr
2,774.00
07/17/2018
5200-48200-63005
2018 GIS 2nd Qtr
1,348.00
07/17/2018
530048300-63005
Check Total:
14,400.00
Vendor:
Hawkins]
Hawkins & Baumgartner, P.A.
Check Sequence: 4
ACH Enabled:
False
June
June 2018 Legal Services
15,631.31
07/17/2018
0101-41240-63015
Check Total:
15,631.31
Vendor:
MetCounV,
Metro Council Wastewater
Check Sequence: 5
ACH Enabled:
False
0001084479
August 2018 Sewer Service
91,614.92
07/17/2018
5200-48200-63230
Check Total:
91,614.92
Vendor:
MetCounE
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services
Check Sequence: 6
ACH Enabled:
False
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/12/2018 - 1:40 PM) Page 1
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
June 2018 June 2018 Sac Report -919.45 07/17/2018 0101-41400-58100
June 2018 June 2018 Sac Report 91,945.00 07/17/2018 0101-00000-23201
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/12/2018 - 1:40 PM) Page 2
Check Total:
91,025.55
Vendor: SirLines
Sir Lines -A -Lot
Check Sequence: 7
51804 - Pymt 111
2018 Pavement Markings
22,081.80
07/17/2018
4140-49300-63010
Check Total:
22,081.80
Vendor: TmGreen
TmGreen
Check Sequence:8
86563105
Weed Control
600.00
07/17/2018
2130-44000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
3,011.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
105.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
130.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
280.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
95.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
293.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
470.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
1,156.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
75.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
233.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
975.00
07/172018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
303.00
07/17/2018
010145000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
170.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
209.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
75.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
204.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
126.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
125.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
93.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
70.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
263.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
975.00
07/17/2018
010145000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
85.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
114.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
209.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
135.00
07/17/2018
010145000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
135.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
209.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
209.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
479.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed Control
261.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/12/2018 - 1:40 PM) Page 2
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
86563105
Weed
Control
600.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed
Control
413.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed
Control
110.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed
Control
290.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed
Control
285.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed
Control
160.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed
Control
110.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed
Control
80.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed
Control
85.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed
Control
60.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed
Control
303.00
07/172018
0101-45000-63010
86563105
Weed
Control
502.00
07/17/2018
0101-45000-63010
Check Total:
Total for Check Run:
Total of Number of Checks:
14,870.00
309,818.90
8
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/12/2018 - 1:40 PW Page 3
ANLbY O F 3
6
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and City Council
CC: Jim Dickinson, City AdminisU
FROM: Michelle Harmer, Deputy City
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Appointing Election Judges for the Primary Election
DATE: July 17, 2018
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is required to appoint judges to serve at the Primary Election on
Tuesday, August 14, 2018.
ACTION REQUIRED
Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution appointing judges for the Primary
Election.
Respectfully submitted,
Michelle Hartner
Deputy City Clerk
Attach: Resolution
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING JUDGES TO SERVE AT THE AUGUST 14, 2018
PRIMARY ELECTION IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
WHEREAS, the City Council is required by State Statute to appoint election judges to
serve at the August 14, 2018 Primary Election.
WHEREAS, the City Council will allow the City Clerk to appoint substitution election
judges if necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following are appointed to serve as
election judges as listed on Attachment A at the August 14, 2018 Primary Election.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 17`" day of July, 2018
Attest:
CITY OF ANDOVER
Michelle Hartner-Deputy City Clerk Julie Trude — Mayor
ATTACHMENT A
Judge Board Report, 2018 Statewide Election
Primary Election, Tuesday, August 14, 2018
Andover P-1
P-1 Hope Lutheran Church, 16180 Round Lake Blvd NW, Andover, MN 55304
Gloria Young, Head Judge
Donna Turnbom, Assistant Head Judge
Sharon Cramer, Election Judge
Carol Moeller, Election Judge
Linda Nelson, Election Judge
Michael Schilling, Election Judge
Jacob Schimetz, Election Judge
Faith Whitcraft, Election Judge
Andover P-10
P-10 Andover Elementary School, 14950 Hanson Blvd NW, Andover, MN 55304
Nicole Iskierka, Head Judge
Larry Rolf, Assistant Head Judge
William Bonin, Election Judge
Shirley Brantingham, Election Judge
Noel Labine, Election Judge
Linda Olson, Election Judge
Mike Roslin, Election Judge
Scott Roth, Election Judge
Diane Terebenet, Election Judge
Andover P-2
P-2 Grace Lutheran Church, 13655 Round Lake Blvd NW, Andover, MN 55304
Gretchen Sabel, Head Judge
Michael Casey, Assistant Head Judge
Judy Berry, Election Judge
Debra Corey, Election Judge
Linda Evavold, Election Judge
Frances Gargano, Election Judge
Cyril Larson, Election Judge
Pamela Schilling, Election Judge
Andover P-3
P-3 Riverdale Assembly of God Church, 3210 Bunker Lake Blvd NW, Andover, MN 55304
Stefanie Moseley, Head Judge
Michael St. John, Assistant Head Judge
Sherry Campbell, Election Judge
Paula Foley, Election Judge
Sandra Johnson, Election Judge
Bev Jovanovich, Election Judge
Susan McBride, Election Judge
Karen Swedberg, Election Judqe
Andover P-4
P-4 Crooked Lake Elementary School, 2939 Bunker Lake Blvd NW, Andover, MN 55304
Leon Tibben, Head Judge
Mark Howard, Assistant Head Judge
Patricia Heinzmann, Election Judge
Wayne Lehmann, Election Judge
Diane Messing, Election Judge
Laura Sargent, Election Judge
Jacqueline Soucie, Election Judge
Printed: 7/10/2018 10:59 AM Page 1 of 3
Judge Board Report, 2018 Statewide Election
Loretta Sunderland. Election J
Andover P-5
P-5 Andover Christian Church, 16045 Nightingale ST NW, Andover, MN 55304
Angel Bourque, Head Judge
Kari Wheeler, Assistant Head Judge
Michelle Carlson, Election Judge
Peggy Conner, Election Judge
Mary Gerrety, Election Judge
Judy Jung, Election Judge
Gary Nelson, Election Judge
Diana Ramseyer, Election Judge
Douglas Soltis, Election Judge
Andover P-6
P-6 Prairie Oak Community Church, 1657 161st Ave NW, Andover, MN 55304
John Stong, Head Judge
Bruce Crane, Assistant Head Judge
Susan Fanucci, Election Judge
Gary Horning, Election Judge
Rana Mattson, Election Judge
William (Bill) Obedoza, Election Judge
Suzanne Peach, Election Judge
Nancy Posl, Election Judge
Sharon Saxon, Election Judge
Lucy Schalwiq, Election Judge
Andover P-7
P-7 Andover Community Center, 15200 Hanson Blvd NW, Andover, MN 55304
John Wolf, Head Judge
Richard Lindmark Jr, Assistant Head Judge
Kandice Barnes, Election Judge
Lois Fritz, Election Judge
Alyson Gullette, Election Judge
Lee Hartner, Election Judge
Harriet Lantz, Election Judge
Pat Meltzer, Election Judge
Andover P-8
P-8 Andover Community Center, 15200 Hanson Boulevard, Andover, MN 55304
Bruce Maltzen, Head Judge
Jody Rieck, Assistant Head Judge
Rene Ferrazzi, Election Judge
Art Gullette, Election Judge
Teresa Horton, Election Judge
Jan Klinsing, Election Judge
Les Lantz, Election Judge
Mary White, Election Judge
Cynthia Wilhelm, Election Judge
Andover P-9
P-9 Bunker Hills Activity Center, 550 Bunker Lake Blvd NW, Andover, MN 55304
Brian Kime, Head Judge
Brigette Meeker, Head Judge
Carol Murschel, Election Judge
Sandy Roslin, Election Judge
Mary Vander Laan, Election Judge
Printed: 7/10/2018 10:59 AM Page 2 of 3
Judge Board Report, 2018 Statewide Election
Vogel, Election Judge
7/10/2018 10:59 AM
' ' l
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW. CI.AN DOVER. MN. US
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Admini
FROM: Lee Brezinka, Finance Manager
SUBJECT: Approve Debt Service Payments
DATE: July 17, 2018
INTRODUCTION
Attached are debt service payments to be paid on July 30, 2018.
DISCUSSION
Debt service payments totaling $227,754.88 are due on August 1, 2018. These are scheduled debt
service payments.
BUDGETIMPACT
These are scheduled debt service payments.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Andover City Council is requested to approve total payments in the amount of $227,754.88.
Please note that Council Meeting minutes will be used as documented approval.
Respectfully submitted,
fir{ �
Lee Brezinka
Attachment
CITY OF ANDOVER
Debt Service Payment Schedule - August 1, 2018
Principal
Interest
Total
General Obligation Revenue Bonds
2009A G.O. Water Revenue Bonds $ -
$ 9,177.50
$ 9,177.50
2016B G.O. Water Revenue Refunding Bonds -
33,100.00
33,100.00
Abatement Bonds
2012C G.O. Abatement Bonds -
166,390.63
166,390.63
Certificates of Indebtedness
2014A G.O. Equipment Certificate -
5,450.00
5,450.00
2016A G.O. Equipment Certificate -
3,743.00
3,743.00
Referendum Bonds
2010A G.O. Open Space Bonds -
9,893.75
9,893.75
$ -
$ 227,754.88
$ 227,754.88
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
no
;OULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
Mayor and Councilmembers
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
Commander Paul Lenzmeier -
Sheriffs Office
Anoka County Sheriff's Office Monthly Report - Sheriff
July 17, 2018
0
INTRODUCTION
Commander Paul Lenzrneier from the Anoka County Sheriff's Office will be present to provide
the Council and the citizens of Andover with an update on law enforcement activities within the
City.
DISCUSSION
To be verbally presented.
ACTION REQUIRED
For Council information.
Respectfully submitted,
Commander Paul Lenzmeier
Anoka County Sheriff's Office
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administropm
ato�
l`J
Joe Janish, Community DeveDirector ? '
FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner
9
SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement — 851 138th Ave NE
- Craig Swalchick - Planning
DATE: July 17, 2018
DISCUSSION
The plat for Hills of Bunker Lake 5`h Addition was approved in May 1994. As part of the plat,
Outlot A was considered buildable; however, the buildable area was small with most of the lot
covered by a drainage and utility easement. In 1996, the outlot was purchased, along with the lot
to the north, by Mr. Swalchick's grandparents. After the passing of the grandparents, Mr.
Swalchick purchased the home and outlot. Recently, Mr. Swalchick sold the home and would
like to sell the outlot, as well.
To make the property more marketable, Mr. Swalchick worked with City Engineering staff and
the Coon Creek Watershed District to increase the buildable area by confining the area needed
for the drainage and utility easement. The buildable area will increase from 50 feet wide to
approximately 65 feet wide.
The site and grading work has been completed. Engineering staff approved the final grading of
the lot and supports the vacation of the drainage and utility easement with the rededication of a
drainage and utility easement encompassing the drainage area.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is asked to hold a public hearing and consider the proposed vacation of drainage and
utility easement.
Attachments
Resolution
Easement Vacation Exhibit
Location Map
Rctfirlly d,
Stephanie . Hanson
City Planner
Cc: Craig Swalchick, 7225 Sterling Dr, Greenfield, MN 55373
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
EASEMENT LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS OUTLOT A, HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE 5TH
ADDITION AND SHOWN ON EXHIBIT A.
WHEREAS, the developer has requested to vacate the described drainage and utility easement;
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no opposition to the request; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds the request would not have a detrimental effect upon the
health, safety, moral, and general welfare of the City of Andover.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby
grants the vacation of drainage and utility easement subject to the following:
1. The vacation of easement shall be recorded at Anoka County.
2. The vacation of easement is contingent on the re -dedication of a drainage and utility
easement to manage the storm water pond.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 17th day of July 2018.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Michelle Harmer, Deputy City Clerk Julie Trude, Mayor
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
-for- CRAIG SWALCHICK
-of- 851 138th Ave NW
Andover, MN
DCHIBIT A
NORTH
I
NW CORNER OF OUT OT A "-
I
S88'58'27"P18.28
S1°32'20 E
„
--- 50.00 -----
24.78
O
ds
kc
2A.
DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT TO BE VACATED
All drainage and utility easements as
originally dedicated on Outlot A, HILLS OF
BUNKER LAKE 5TH ADDITION, according to
the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County,
Minnesota.
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
120
1 INCH = 30 FEET
Outlot A, HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE 5TH ADDITION, Anoka
County, Minnesota.
Location: Andover, MN
Scale 1"= 30' 1 Drawn By. CMB
Project Manager:
JER Jab No.: 12411ED
o Denotes Iron Set I • Denotes Iron Found
Bearings shown are on an assumed datum.
I hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws
E.G. RUR 8 SRNS, INC_
of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 12th day of June 2018.
Protesslonal Land Surveyors
ww Wrud.co 6776 Lake Drive NE Suite 110
Lino Lakes, MN 55614
License No. 41578
TeL(551)W4"G Fax(651)361A701
M
DFFICIAL PLAY A
'R LAKE 5 TH AD&TION CITY
OKA cont
\9\9\
1 of Sac. 35, T. 32, R. 24.
East line of Cost: Lot I. Sac 35. \ \ Scale: I inch = 100
I \ � For the purposes of
North
ne of the
96.06-1 naao exon r-gibE� r-gy'b�� I-6ZD�� g a9.15$ uama�z 49.07 eu� � p ofaSec. 35.I T. 32. R.
SS A, pUfLOT B' R s I 31 I 31 31 r---� a t/Zw4rp. wb �YW-t asesmed to bear S 8
gI 3 $ 9RuxnaE 6 - I 4 FI In 3 pi IR 2 ^I Ig 1 ,^,1„ 17'x17 4b q+ w " £ o Denotes Iron Pipe : Q
�• z uwtt RIS gl I _ �I le 91 9111 tg, �O : r < \ plastic plug -tamped c(Q
q rn- $w 8cP g 1 �`p'S IIS g. 0\ L
'�tp n�9z v4'dtM1 e`o.� • I- 91 1 • g gl 6 ml I- 91 - b'a--I C �' a1 'o ' W
tr2 -5 p j+�• r �qqy a •I I S I �I �I 'i I $ t-zase cs\ Drar.ciashoes and Utility E
mow• w z d1 wo L`[a4.g'LJ 6683) L ea_os J L34 -°=J L_]xm t�br• OUfLK �y+N y\\ anown thus.. I I
R R 19ao0 - 1.
NC01'33'E 181.53 R-aam.00 R NI'J220'W ]09.&5 R ._az.""ar} w
$ E-109.21 q .. 0.2490
12L53 r 80-00 r�.aoJl n r eraser 9r0] -1 eroi l 4 4% fsa'st• _
34p W.w R\ aol U
F Im RI 18 -F' I I" 5T" RoR ISNI I' ml Im ^I y'p ,re them, Io feet in widen O
.2'•R�I I �b Ir,4 I
MIS i5RI \Eu, B $ F \ front and reor lot line J
I' IIS 18 16 1214 ml 19 ml 12 2-1 rT011I/�IDT R R \YR. .yw�% u_ 1 feat in width and edit
I �+ =. \y,x�y'%°- ; 1
z 1 WI l .I I Noro1'I I aPe SI 1841Ja zl l I g s '>;i\ l lines, unless of lot.
y9'z9') �ffi L@Q1mJ Lfl2�J LS5.l1�J L_85.p9_J LTJ L 84,20 _ W �Sf� rRl 1 shown on the plat
I0,9J-4L 0• �} bbl N 1
I' 74381 r, T3a3o --/ Irmo-\r-T3).OF- --;wss -18Lw R� 1''L tbel
ll i,pl m 1w eo v1
GRAPHIC S
100 so
4J\,\�
UP
e11,a //�p/ \r•\j aa4
.s ww y$ x 8 $J
1I zx Fm1
.I1el �
1slid Y '
1 211 I
l
i IN FEef
'Will557t- rmt1 a l
fe\$� 111 I I
11q \\4° 111 b'iei43iJ Lr.Ia qr ?/ / Ra \\fig dy;•Jt t" W
N•Nrip, atm6 & 111
}. aLb3 \ b\d�4U L- P.1 t(�b,Jr NQ:o \\\d��`� 9° St. W to 18 bey_, 1 `�•'�
r
b$�'tr 3. \. aao L-zer.ea •J a• .1i'8 \i � � r asaell g.8 1 r L-__-� -�1 1
Q/ 5t. R?y ots•srls• 'I!W, \>;i Y., ,1y"P�p�N�Y9i53�1\ ra4o. Ilz ee`�g ` 1 m r tas. 4 811 1
IS W J 11
� '8 /ii.=l?e� t• / G. 4AsL9 'b dS"' i^\\ ` 18y- el t L tl3'iY ��=1 �' 1
y�M• ^ \4.J6 /e r9 dg B'ri Y' 8 /<<Jv� ��4.,� �� IG; I I .r- 3 &i N 11
Cd r �• 1ti 1 ----J' � $1 1
a.si•e;Po�,�'' 4 3;/L N1'.i�-�i9.Ia .3. ,n tf /} ��`NJe. i e � I aaw 4" B N47�'3_''Jr
p`c./�9w• \��, R/� zd yr, kkppSIIS' 8 /ra,8 ��0 14 qC ts.00 i��'e
�4 e'I' \e \�\ TrJryr y ,vY �� / �� +e 1Tep a;n�•re,N.w /ayn.� 11 SNz �_-5s 2 '9 111
I JS 12 tom Ca xzr /13 2 !v •P 521. '�'w is I 0- w 1 rn
8yl /'���s•,yr. o a! � 1 '1 rn l
�\ y �: \'e\ >s• N93a_!s_t �� 3 �$ f g*^' �4 2
\ a
oIIn
IS
112I4S 'zdi z
3 8`\\� 1 tgrW4tl wls v_Iaa.°_a_
-J `_ izaei _fiJ Lz mz 3 ♦ \.�
N57.42
NO.2J'Oa E 2&1.16 20. Ee f�/D°a� Jr '�'� / \�ry3a� \�RJ''ya�B 39.19 5 2� - - I -°•
(- ND 2H0i'aa.E.9a>�% x s t.6
12 �' r--rs1.� 10 i T �.t'Pi�i Sdtast9 8ry
L_xo g'w't-J N > B \ '° Imo 4 a.� ey'i v -1 d?8 °0 1 la
1eao3- < I$ W \ Ie= 4.rntiyr• r 38.'sxlC-I�.ze I rpcpti to
r-=- -1 Po v \ z e9° 1a
Id 14. a 8I L�Q2_>2c _ „_�rrOE'3)•c ]?q : �`s:lr \\\moo„• !1m d 10
I
iNa•2] W E 18 $I 16m \ �+•� `t9• "a. UI
L-- ---J - x \ 42 R\\. < l m
0 1.
IS s $I i L-gs_oo
13
� IS $I n f$ 1145.84-1 rp$E�1 (•--- --J F _ 1 �W4� \\`�4 2 pj\%t% ,
L1ig:2i' 'L_J lg xO'n'OV2113 z]w�l l 'u -moi z L�zz. \\tee a 11
$ r'- ieo,0o n.ta a zs 8 $i h9 7 -•RI I$ 8 ' 1 ti -4y,
'35
Iw vm•an'x T \4ao. �I M� •I I i'C/ u.Mao.� a ryN 1
12 �. m p \ m a
La2mJ L4�° ai i" /�x :nr�.�Y weal line of Govt. tot I, sea 3s.
I.E. 1/4, Sec. 35. L%�� pl >p o N _---
__ O _ -4 r� a -
of
of the N.E. 1/4, g Sec. 35.�ty0�
30 NEW R° � 3 a
I^
\ 1f aim/eh 7r4 Ijr� - r eaoo 3"9.sa� IXM1ir\s\`'\'.a •$�% .�/ PARK 11
-'y
• / a B ai i� T5 aS�aJa< /
fy�OJ// 9 112 211 o1 y6 aw$d5 .� I
aJ 91.2t JL-I�'u-J L. BaW JL_1a3.18_i L1a�
R _ 1
EASEMENT ger mat. 6 n]av PARK $ 1
2117.7. me.
1--
'W 2348.85- .1 1
iudington Northam Railroad Company.
RAILROAD COMPANY
:.. and fonnedy peat Nwl Rawag J - - - - �1 r
-- -
"'' = "" "`'t" """ John Oliver & Associates
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS-
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator 'rirector Joe Janish, Community Develop
FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner
SUBJECT: Accept Easement for Drainage and Utility Purposes — 851 1381h Ave NW — Craig
Swalchick - Planning
DATE: July 17, 2018
DISCUSSION
As part of the Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement for the property located at 851 - 138th
Ave NW, an easement is required to be dedicated encompassing the storm water ponding to
allow the City maintenance access.
The Quit Claim Deed is being reviewed by the City Attorney and is attached for your review.
ACTION REQUIRED
If the Vacation of Easement was approved, the City Council is requested to accept the easement
and approve the attached Quit Claim Deed, pending any changes by the City Attorney.
If the Vacation of Easement was not approved, then no action is required by the City Council.
Attachments
Location Map
Quit Claim Deed — Drainage and Utility Easement
Stephanie . Hanson
City Planner
Cc: Craig Swalchick, 7225 Sterling Dr, Greenfield, MN 55373
NFICIAL PLAY
CITY OF AND(
'R LAKE 5TH ADA TION ANOKA COUN
e� y,
I of Sec 35, T. 32. R. 24. East line of'GoJt: Lot I. Sec 35l ) \ Scale, I inch = 100 1
For the h line of of t
190.00 BJ.00 r,��0-� �-R;.� -Rr�_, eiLy Nna1 49.0'! 6°.6J p ------ of North line of the
96-06-1 8 -III S 4_ ee of Seo. 35• T. 32, R.
R N. OUTLOAN B' R I z1 I )I I �I _ e $ �I� assumed to bear 505
3 oRuxxaE un I 4 .I 1 8 rl 2 I r 1' g �' >+ e a
81PEE z $ ufvtt -."'� 5 J 1a Ie $ Ig Q RI 4{p $ y 'b o Denotes Iron pipe s M
w_R8w R d?8 m Ig $I I¢ Rs •.^I I: SI IXi li <4N Ok1ROT.y� n <� \\ Plastie plug stamped
D I _M, $ °b.l zl- SII Ry �I I 6
J Drainage and Utility E, `
,opp x dv L%V.3J .1!e.e]JL e4_aoJL�a-w J�T3@ �b'sror OUROT \
IIO.W s >zy 4y D �i \ \ shown thur. I C
R
8190ao ST.. A pl.u.�. R N.W. '2a. +$ tea° 'Nm\• v\I s 0
NO'Of]J"E 49LSJ R -1000.W R NI'32'20'W Y)9.65 R �MZe>�,• h pati Cit\ 9 1 -
R tsla9.as a , °i!�'9a D 's.} e\ le J L ro
121.0r &SN 1 r aso5� (- 95.03 l U
r eo-aa 1 roaao-t -I . t. �5i fr,•s`' , �e \
wll :II }II
sl ,.II �I I¢ bg• A RII ;.II 2sII I _
G IS ;1 14 .I be R*a I�� I Ile P'I la Fpl s, rq N`s'500.,'w mwY� 0 1` vein 10 feet in widt?
214 11$ •'�I FR '� Igm I I I ^SI �IIILOT 1su; 8 8-1 A 1 front and rear lot line
' A R K b I 19 :I I A :III 18 I 16 z14I 1 19 SII Y2 : rT� T "•` Q Ir4 'N'W-� U ` feet In width and adk
I wl i .I-No'ol•I I ss•w I W711e I I ,1 `' = 1�:x��=°- =-1
I S 9 1 Imes, unless otherwise
INC' V % �'o° LHO11aJ LI12-92J LJ64.g9_J L_9SW_JL%ia2J L UF3A __ 1:- f ;-IsSrb m41 1 shown on the plat.
L��os r� 13536-_7 -roe.m-l�-W-09- C-Iw.sa-'If-18Y79`l SQ• ISL 7 pll NI
Bell /� rJ' \\�\�' D 1IA W 111- el ti �1 �`e IS'•�pz x9_-1 w >~�I 100 GRAPHIC
31 -.115 q," x 9s -I"v-u� I
en
w I$<`R'�W• r-xa•Is'saw 81 m cl
< 1' $ I \�.o\''•2ey s w Ia g 1 c
n\ 4 SI &_ I I m 3/ \ \'o =\\,e m l 1'w:: I lm F mk I"9. Si cz y 1
\\ape• mllfi 21i i / �� \\\}` \\ t`v 55.Oe1L - w S r ,e;a•1�J IN FEET.
0
i tS\\�-, 11 jl zR/R 7 \�\Zz \\\vyo3co� ,w xe• sYW'x `- Iss.oa 1 11
V'&' \ p8tt1 a^i=°•ia J L rrsr / / e p \\a a�Q'� `� W
s, c% \o+gv^t�L_ tsG:' •.r>. AS:B \dy`� w sT. x N• m 15 4 w 1
b`6 fib'. V 2000 L-zer •fJww' `m' V m"� r eo-ao I ta*-Q aS 1 Zi
\fi •(. v-�s n4e.'° 'l• -8 .6 1��.^< 55. II g.8 1 a L-__oo -"1 1
.0
Of" P (VT`yat \``1z42L. 16z a8.ro �I z i$ - 81 1
at >� �'"8°o's•s9 /ei:� r yes i � i^\\ \I��. '>•3.01� d- .1 e � xs•IsSa'w _J 1
tse d �tf y'P \ \'• 18 NI I -Lss.�° 1
N 8win
$I 1
�"%�•'`?-f r,�"rzmoJ.y .� 71, '4r '8 \\tN
ar" ]
/• v s9.92 zaz'? � 13s� �� /,fJ >eo ]`a° Nrsa s•w ���� �I SuZ 1 2 $81t x Inl
Imo\ ♦\y. 6Ip Bni L ro / �8' 2ua al If 18 J r^
Q
'S
,s+\1l\ e\.'&, s 3/�?'1 �4a46�len l d9n 1 2 in 3r f7&p-Tcw°'•t°o yay t� �•S' L\s 1.g s h U 1-0 q JI L__N3_.•1 00 --�61 l
14.3 112
I
to
R'P <. § Po w 13
m _o]• E n 'a` / 'b.\ \ qq,,zp `S 1 x�Pw- rj�• ?7 1 y
-�1- izo.wi _.pj L is255r,Po_mil » 99 -S`d/ 8
xo•2rw'E 2ezu 2aoo <: 9.7 Z+p\ \S sj 9 ]s_'s 5 I o
__IIggpp. __ L ra>aPo. Lnf ys / \`Mb� . o'�g%e_ s c- 2�
No'27W"E 8 N�2,�M'E i I1D � t, .a /i 9J W 'ii a GeGet,
xrc27 wg 'I Isi
L---- -J n a 18 70 \\a Imft p 4 qa• \V c°
r--IFa�_ t.ep4rY4• > -rtia�s
18 81 L-1+o•zroa•g_S--xrro9',n. q q.� \\\e Ile d 16
I 14 s s' ! f--lie.io--1 -E _a> : r> 4 ei°¢ \ a -1 0
i L-NO'2]'04'E_J I$ 81 6e mess
I'
r r bI m D 8I, 3 t`• 90.\ \elf \\f O G 1'
IS 81 z TF - xlrroar $1 o N <4�49�g`\\ 4: \\\ 1 al 1
I$ 81 r$-Ias.m-1 r4-.�1 f - c_-/ l� 1^t ojegz�. \ \. 2 411
L. J+g'zz• !i_J - IB xo'29'wt ll3oawtll I4s.z-s'-�-
tw r- reo.ao u.0 '' 8 $IPS
m l 4 I II' n '
$ to a.2o'ae'sa' ` v \< I I•I I` dv�g/ na14V
1 d 12 L-1�'al ] V _ \�4 QJ. P,� m nQt_ Q/ n �� i&5 � �4 •/ �l'fJ.. Fi 1
I.E. 1/4, S.. 35. ''L? -_`4
of N° N.E. I/4, to Sec. .' CAMO E R �Iza'4"ri°•I{\a9s BoAJ//e tl
81PARK
ol &II$ Yx-,I
10b0 =1 I� 8 ' 8
'el I-7� �OIIN6, �jsieJs° I
RTe\ 91.24 _f L_1R42- Ilz 1po zll Loire-1ji'as ie �/ 1
J JL_- JL-
EASD.R]ei psr lest / 9W550 P A R K,
211279
anal 1
'W 2348.85- 1------
ludington Northam Rolland Company.
RAILROAD COMPANY e t 1
.., mtl fwmerl9 Great Ncrfxwn Rahn, ) I ao I A 1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _I - -t--_---_
,,....iii..,. I 1 1
John Oliver & Associates
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS.
CLAIM DEED
n or Partnership to Corporation or Partnership
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
(Date)
County Auditor
by
Deputy
TAX DUE:
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Craig and Moriah Swalchick (collectively referred to herein as "Grantor"),
hereby conveys and quitclaims to the City of Andover, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of
Minnesota ("Grantee"), a permanent easement for drainage and utility purpose in, under, over and upon the real
property, in Anoka County, Minnesota, described in the attached Exhibit A
eck box if applicable:
The Seller certifies that the seller does not know of any wells on the described real property.
r� well disclosure certificate accompanies this document.
�'i am familiar with the property described in this instrument and I certify that the status and number of wells on the described
'real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate.
Grantor.
Affix Deed Tax Stamp Here
Swalchick /Moriah
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the ay of 2018,
Craig and Moriah Swalchick.
1
tiK L , • y
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
Craig Swalchick
7225 Sterling Dr.
Greenfield MN. 55373
GVrTURE NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICIAL
Check here if part or all of the land is Registered (Torrens) ❑
Tax Statements far the real property described in this instrument should
be seat to (include name and address of Grantee):
Easement Only
Craig Swalchick
7225 Sterling Dr.
Greenfield MN. 55373
ral
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
-for- CRAIG SWALCHICK
-of- 851 138th Ave NW
Andover, MN
EXHIBIT A
NORTH
---NW CORNER OF OUTLOT A •'-
i
S89'58'27"E 159.29
I - S1032'20"E
•., _ ___ 24.78
111 ------=
— S89'58'27'E
.6 --49.92
--<-� zw �P
wO
PJ0
O
LLOR 0
00b
O=
o -z
o I IN ` tiiti�9
y I n
I VAN
I u
i 1 11
61 `
-- y
/°
I �'
---SOUTH UNE OF OUT -OT A
a g810.9?"
- R% .281
ps8
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EASEMENT
A perpetual easement for drainage and utility purposes over,
under and across the westerly 6 feet and southerly 10 feet of
Outlot A, HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE 5TH ADDITION, Anoka County,
Minnesota.
Together with a perpetual easement for drainage and utility
purposes over, under and across that part of said Outlat A, which
lies northerly, northeasterly, and easterly of the following
described line:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said Outlet A;
thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 01
minutes 33 seconds West along the west line of said Outlot
A, a distance of 29.36 feet to the point of beginning of the
line to be described; thence South 89 degrees 58 minutes
27 seconds East, a distance of 49.92 feet; thence South 44
degrees 11 minutes 54 seconds East, a distance of 26.60
feet; thence South 00 degrees 01 minutes 33 seconds West,
a distance of 79.86 feet to the south line of said Outlot A
and said line there terminating.
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60 120
I INCH = 30 FEET
Outlot A, HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE 5TH ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota.
Location: Andover, MN
Scale 1"= 30' 1 Drawn By. CMB
Project Manager: JER Job No.: 12411ED
o Denotes Iron Set 1 • Denotes Iron Found
Bearings shown are on an assumed datum.
hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws
/�ER. RNR & go NS, INC.
of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 12th day of .lune 2018.
'^"" Professional Lend Surveyors
41578
ve NE Suite110
'0'"atom Lino LakesDMN 55 14
License No.
Tel. (651)361440 Fea(651)361d's,
LI
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
(763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator '
Joe Janish, Community Development
FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City
SUBJECT: Variance Request— 167" Ave NW/Maniteau Blvd NW — Charles Lehn
DATE: July 17, 2018
INTRODUCTION
The property owners/applicants submitted a variance request for the properties located at 167' Ave NW
and Maniteau Blvd NW. The request is to reduce the required width of the lot(s) at the front yard setback
(the width of the lot 40 feet from the right-of-way) to allow for a future lot split.
DISCUSSION
Variance Review
The proposed variance requests are to reduce the lot width at the front yard setback from 300 feet to 100
feet for the purpose of subdividing the two (2) properties into three (3) lots. If the Variance requests are
approved, the applicant will work with City staff to begin the process for the lot splits.
The existing two (2) lots meet code requirements for lot width, depth and area. However, if the lot is
further subdivided, each lot will require a variance for lot width at the front yard setback but will meet
code requirements for fifty (50) feet width at the right-of-way. Attached is an exhibit showing the
proposed variance requests. Existing and proposed lot measurements are as follows and the variances are
highlighted in yellow:
Code Regulations, Existing and Propose Dimensions
As shown on the concept plan on page 46, the future lot split will create a landlocked property
shown as Lot 4. At this time, the landowners are working with the Minnesota Land Trust about a
possible Conservation Easement over the property and a trail that would link the existing
neighborhood to Timber Rivers Park, as shown on attachments 43 and 44. If the parcel is obtained
City Code
Regsfor
Existing
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
Shoreland
2 lots
Lot 1
Lot 2
Lot 3
Lot Width at
50 ft
330 ft
50 ft
50 ft
50 ft
ROW
Lot Width at
Front Yard
300 ft
315.5 ft
102.36 ft
102.69 ft
110.51 ft
Setback
Lot Depth
250 ft
400+ ft
800+ ft
800+ ft
336+ ft
19.34
5.42
5.26
4.15
Lot Area
4 acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
As shown on the concept plan on page 46, the future lot split will create a landlocked property
shown as Lot 4. At this time, the landowners are working with the Minnesota Land Trust about a
possible Conservation Easement over the property and a trail that would link the existing
neighborhood to Timber Rivers Park, as shown on attachments 43 and 44. If the parcel is obtained
M
by an environmental agency, the access easement will be required over the trail easement. The land
trust will allow for passive recreation; however, they will reestablish native vegetation and
wetlands.
If the land trust does not obtain Lot 4, the property must be combined with an adjacent property as
to not create a landlocked parcel. This will be an item that will continue to be discussed between
staff and the property owners.
Review Criteria
The Andover Comprehensive Plan and other adopted plans, such as the Transportation Plan; and
City Codes must be taken into consideration when granting Variances. All of which are
interrelated; therefore, the cause and effect of each topic must be considered when decisions are
made.
Comprehensive Plan
The Comprehensive Plan describes goals, objectives and policies that must be taken into
consideration when the City is planning for the future of the community. The following goals
pertain to the proposed request and have been attached for your review:
Land Use Goals, Objectives and Policies
Goal: Allow residential growth while maintaining the quality of natural resources and amenities.
The land owners are currently working with a conservation agency to possibly place a conservation
easement on the northern most lot (4). The Conservation Easement would protect the resources and
the property would be enhanced by planting native vegetation and restoring natural wetlands.
Lots within the Rum River development area must be a minimum of four (4) acres. Each of the
proposed lots meet the minimum lot size requirement so the density requirement is being met. The
natural resources (i.e. trees, bluffs, wetlands, floodplain) will be maintained and further protected
through City Codes.
Transportation Goals, Objective and Policies
Goal: Enhance the accessibility by providing an interconnected multi -use trail system.
The proposed trail easement provides an accessible trail system that links the residential
neighborhoods and park area.
Parks & Open Space Goals, Objectives and Policies
Goal: Promote, protect, preserve and enhance the City's natural and open space for the enjoyment of
residents, protection of water and air quality and the preservation of wildlife habitat.
The plan for a trail easement will provide a connection with the park and trail systems in a manner
that both preserves and allows public enjoyment of the natural area.
Andover Transportation Plan
Like the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the Andover Transportation Plan
also describes goals, objective and policies that need to be taken into consideration.
Goal: Provide multi -model and transportation options, enhancing accessibility and providing an
interconnected multi -use trail system, whenever and wherever feasible and advantageous.
The proposed trail easement provides an accessible trail system that links the residential
neighborhoods and park areas.
City Code Variance Criteria
12-14-7 and 13-5-9 outlines criteria when considering variances. Code states "Variances may be
granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in
complying with the official control. "Practical difficulties" as used in connection with the granting
of a variance, means:
12-14-7 Variance Criteria
A. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by an
official control.
Required lot widths at the public right-of-way is 50 feet. Each lot meets the required width at the
right-of-way. Fifty (50) feet from the right-of-way the lot width is required to be 300 feet. The
proposed lot widths of 100 feet provide ample access and room to construct homes while still
leaving enough of a buffer space between the neighboring properties.
• Obtaining an additional building pad will not alter the character of the neighborhood.
Without the variance, lots 1 & 3 buildable area will remain in the same location. Eventually
homes will be constructed on these lots. With the variance, a driveway for lot 2 will be
visible; however, the building pad is set back to the west, next to the Rum River, and will
not be visible from the street.
B. The plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the
landowner.
• City codes continue to evolve and change over time. The land has been in the Russell family for
seven (7) generations. The original land has been developed a bit at a time. During the 1960's
and 70's, the one (1) acre parcels surrounding the land were developed, along with the 2 -acre
parcels along the river. As codes have changed, so have the lot sizes of the surrounding parcels.
• In addition, the curvature of the road at 1671 Ave NW and Maniteau is not a typical design.
Curvatures in road are designed to accommodate a 30 -mph speed. The existing tight curve
decreases the amount of property abutting the road.
C. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality and will not alter the
rural residential character.
• The density requirement in the Rum River district is 4 acre minimums per lot. The approval of the
variance will allow for the subdivision of the land that will create 3 — 4+ acre lots and a 20+ acre
landlocked parcel which will be addressed during the lot split process. The further subdivision of
the land will follow the density requirement in the rural residential/Rum River development area.
• The structure setback from neighboring properties will be a great enough distance to retain the
rural character and will be buffered by the existing vegetation.
The lot and surrounding properties are heavily wooded. A minimal number of trees would be
removed for the construction of the new home; therefore, the rural woodsy feel of the area will
remain.
L)
• Obtaining an additional building pad will not alter the character of the neighborhood.
Without the variance, lots 1 & 3 buildable area will remain in the same location. Eventually
homes will be constructed on these lots. With the variance, a driveway for lot 2 will be
visible; however, the building pad is set back to the west, next to the Rum River, and will
not be visible from the street.
13-5-9 Bluffland and Riverland Development Variance Criteria
A. Granting of the variance is not contrary to the purpose and intent of the zoning provisions
herein established by these standard and criteria and is consistent with the Management Plan
for the Rum River.
• The variance will not increase the density within the Rum River area. Code requires each lot
to be a minimum of four (4) acres. The proposed lots exceed four (4) acres in size.
B. A variance may not be granted to allow any use which is not permitted or a conditional use
in the Rum River land use district.
• Residential development is a permitted use.
C. Granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality as established by
the Management Plan for the Rum River.
• Obtaining an additional building pad will not alter the character of the neighborhood.
Without the variance, lots 1 & 3 buildable area will remain in the same location. Eventually
homes will be constructed on these lots. With the variance, a driveway for lot 2 will be
visible; however, the building pad is set back to the west, next to the Rum River, and will
not be visible from the street.
• The home on lot 2 will be visible from the river. The homes on lots 1 and 3 will be visible
from the roadway.
Tree Preservation/Riverland Development
As shown on the attached site photos, the properties are heavily wooded; as is the surrounding
neighborhood. City Code 13-5 Bluffland and Riverland Development emphasizes the preservation of
trees and has strict regulations on tree removal. The vast majority of the existing vegetation on the
properties is protected by code. Clear cutting is allowed in areas designated for construction. Selective
(minimal) cutting and understory pruning or cutting is allowed on trees less than four (4) inches in
diameter. The remaining vegetation must remain intact and protected.
Andover Review Committee (ARC)
Staff reviewed the variance proposal. Comments are attached for your review. Staff comments pertain to
items that will need to be addressed at the time the property is further subdivided; at which time, all staff
comments will need to be satisfactorily addressed.
As part of the Comprehensive Plan and Andover Transportation Plan, it's a City goal to interconnect
trails, parks and neighborhoods. When the residential development known as Timber River Estates (to the
north) was developed, the City recommended the connection of the two (2) neighborhoods. A trail
easement from Argon Street to the north would have made the connection. However, the connection was
not obtained.
The proposed development and trail easement dedication would complete the connection of the existing
neighborhood to Timber Rivers Park and the Timber Rivers Estates neighborhood. Staff recommends the
property owners continue to work with staff to ensure the proper placement for a trail easement. The
attached map shows the potential trail location.
15
Agency Reviews
City Code 13-5 Bluffland and Riverland Development regulates development along the Rum River in
order to protect and preserve the scenic, recreational, natural, historical and scientific values of the Rum
River in a manner consistent with Minnesota Statutes and the Management Plan for the Rum River. The
City of Andover is the governing unit to administer the code.
As part of the administration process, the City is required to notify the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (MNDNR) of all land use requests within the Rum River development area. The public hearing
notice and staff report were sent to the Area Hydrologist; in which a thirty (30) day review period for the
proposal is required. At this time, MNDNR acknowledged the request but did not provide staff with
comments.
If the variances are granted, the applicant will be required to submit an application to the Lower Rum
River Watershed Management Organization (LRRWMO) and obtain a permit prior to any land
disturbance of one (1) acre and greater.
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
A public hearing was held at the June 12, 2018 Commission meeting. A draft of the meeting minutes is
attached for your review. There were many public comments regarding the following:
• Concerns regarding a lot width smaller than 200 feet at the front yard setback
• A Ramsey resident had concerns about the close proximity of the future home on Lot 2 next to
the river
• Resident withdrew his name from the petition because he no longer supports a lot width less than
200 feet
The Commission had discussion regarding who will manage the conservation easement and trail;
buildability of the lots; surrounding lot sizes and the location of the property owners that signed the
petition in support of the requests.
The first motion resulted in a 3 -3 vote. During the discussion, two (2) Commissioner's switched votes to
deny the Variance in order to move the application forward to the City Council; although they were not
necessarily in full agreement of a denial recommendation.
NEXT STEP
If the variances are granted, the lot split will be completed administratively. The applicant will be
required to submit grading plans, soil borings, tree protection plan, and surveys. The survey must reflect
trail location. A wetland delineation has been completed and is under review by the LRRWMO. The
applicant and City staff will continue to work together to ensure the goals of the Comprehensive Plan are
met; and Commission, Council and staff comments are satisfactorily addressed.
ACTION REQUESTED
The City Council is requested to review the variance requests, take into consideration public comments,
Commission recommendation and approve or deny the request, based on findings of fact.
Although the Commission recommended denial, Staff drafted a resolution of approval with potential
findings of fact. If City Council approves the Variance requests, then the applicant will work with staff to
begin the process of the lot split. If the Council desires to deny the variance requests, staff suggests the
City Council direct staff to draft a resolution of denial for consideration at the next City Council meeting,
based on the evening's discussion.
C.
Attachments
Resolutions of Approval and Denial
Location Map
Applicant's Letter
June 12, 2018 Draft PZ Meeting Minutes
Staff Comments, May 31, 2018
Resident Letter and Petition of Support
June 18, 2018 Resident Letter
Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies
- Land Use, Transportation, Parks and Open Space
City Code 13-5 Bluffland and Riverland Development Review Criteria and Purpose
City Code 12-14-7 Zoning Code Review Criteria
Site Photos
Variance Exhibit
Potential Trail Location
FEMA Floodway Map
Proposed Lot Split Maps
Re;�fully bmi d,
Stephani L. Hanson
City Planner
Cc: Richard Lehn, 16640 Roanoke St NW, Andover, MN 55304
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO XXX
A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1671h
AVENUE NW AND MANITEAU BOULEVARD NW, PIN'S 12-32-25-31-0024 AND 12-32-
25-33-0025, LEGALLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A
WHEREAS, the property owners have requested approval of variances to reduce the width of the
lot at the front yard setback; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning
Commission has conducted a public hearing on said variances; and
WHEREAS, as a result of such public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval of the variances based on the variance review criteria for granting a
variance under City Code 12-14-7 B and 13-5-9; and
WHEREAS, City Council completed a review of the variances, along with Planning and Zoning
Commission recommendation; and
WHEREAS, City Council approves the variances to reduce the required width at the front yard
setback from 300 feet to 102.36 feet; 300 feet to 102.69 feet; and 300 feet to 110.51 feet for the
future lot split of the existing lots; and
WHEREAS, based on the criteria for granting a variance under City Code 12-14-713 and 13-5-9,
City Council finds the following findings of fact to support the approval of the variance requests:
• Required lot widths at the public right-of-way is 50 feet. Each lot meets the required
width at the right-of-way. Fifty (50) feet from the right-of-way the lot width is required to
be 300 feet. The proposed lot widths of 100 feet provide ample access and room to
construct homes while still leaving enough of a buffer space between the neighboring
properties.
Obtaining an additional building pad will not alter the character of the neighborhood.
Without the variance, lots 1 & 3 buildable area will remain in the same location.
Eventually homes will be constructed on these lots. With the variance, a driveway
for lot 2 will be visible; however, the building pad is set back to the west, next the
Rum River, and will not be visible from the street. There will be one (1) visible
home from the river view.
• City codes continue to evolve and change over time. The land has been in the Russell
family for seven (7) generations. The original land has been developed a bit at a time.
During the 1960's and 70's, the one (1) acre parcels surrounding the land were
developed, along with the 2 -acre parcels along the river. As codes have changed, so have
the lot sizes of the surrounding parcels.
• The structure setback from neighboring properties will be a great enough distance to
retain the rural character and will be buffered by the existing vegetation.
• The lot and surrounding properties are heavily wooded. A minimal number of trees
would be removed for the construction of the new home; therefore, the rural woodsy feel
of the area will remain.
• Lot widths of neighboring properties range from 181 feet to 500+ feet. Although lot
widths vary in the area, the rural woodsy feel of the area remains intact.
• Residential development is a permitted use.
• The variance will not increase the density within the Rum River area. Code requires
each lot to be a minimum of four (4) acres. The proposed lots exceed four (4) acres
in size.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council acknowledge the
dedication of a trail easement will meet the goals within the Andover Comprehensive Plan
and Andover Transportation Plan to provide an accessible trail link between an existing park
and neighborhoods for passive recreational purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby
approves the variances with the following conditions:
1. The lot splits must be approved within one year of the approval of the variances.
Variance approvals will be invalid after such time.
2. Trail easement location must be determined by staff and dedicated to the City at the time
of the approval and filed with Anoka County.
3. Proposed lot 4 must be combined with an existing lot or be placed in control and
managed by an environmental agency; provided a recreational trail easement is allowed.
4. Lot split approval is contingent upon adhering to all other city requirements being met for
lot splits.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this _ day of 2018.
ATTEST CITY OF ANDOVER
Michelle Hartner, City Clerk
Julie Trude, Mayor
2
N
I
EXHIBIT A
Legal Descriptions
PIN 12-32-25-31-0024
THAT PRT OF GOVT LOT 6 SEC 12 TWP 32 RGE 25 LYG WLY OF C/L OF ARGON ST &
ITS NLY EXTN, EX THAT PRT DESC AS FOL: COM AT A PT ON S LINE OF GOVT LOT
5 SD SEC 343.97 FT W OF SE COR THEREOF, TH N AT RT ANGTO SD S LINE 1200 FT,
TH W AT RT ANG 33 FT, TH N AT RT ANG 10 FT, TH N 21 DEG 29 MIN 17 SEC E 130.76
FT, TH N 89 DEG 56 MIN 08 SEC W 190.67 FT TO POB AKA PT "A", TH S 89 DEG 56 MIN
08 SEC E 190.67 FT, TH N 21 DEG 29 MIN 17 SEC E 49.26 FT, TH N 963.08 FT, TH W AT
RT ANG 233 FT, TH S AT RT ANG 740.59 FT TH S 22 DEG 14 MIN 10 SEC E TO A PT
208.71 FT N OF POB AS MEAS AT RT ANG TO SD S LINE OF GOVT LOT 5, TH S 208.71
FT TO POB, ALSO EX THAT PRT OF SD GOVT LOT 6 DESC AS FOL, BEG AT SD PT
"A", TH N 89 DEG 56 MIN 08 SEC W 200 FT, TH N AT RT ANG TO SD S LINE OF GOVT
LOT 5 267.88 FT, TH E PRLL/W SD S LINE 175.71 FT, TH S 22 DEG 14 MIN 10 SEC E TO
A PT 208.71 FT N OF POB AS MEAS AT RT ANG TO SD S LINE, TH S 208.71 FT TO POB,
ALSO EX THAT PRT OF SD GOVT LOT 6 DESC AS FOL, COM AT SD PT "A", TH N 89
DEG 56 MIN 08 SEC W 200 FT TO POB, TH CONT N 89 DEG 56 MIN 08 SEC W 200 FT,
TH N AT RT ANG TO S LINE OF SD GOVT LOT 5 267.66 FT, TH E AT RT ANG TO
INTER/W A LINE DRAWN N FROM POB, TH S AT RT ANG 267.88FT TO POB, ALSO EX
THAT PRT OF GOVT LOT 6 DESC AS FOL, COM AT A PT ON S LINE OF GOVT LOT 5
SD SEC 343.97 FT W OF SE COR THEREOF, TH N, ASS BRG, AT RT ANG TO SD S LINE
1200 FT, TH W AT RT ANG 33 FT, THN AT RT ANG 10 FT, TH N 21 DEG 29 MIN 17 SEC
E 180.02 FT, TH N 963.08 FT TO POB, TH CONT N TO N LINE OF SD GOVT LOT 6, TH
WLY ALG SD N LINE TO ELY SHORE OF RUM RIVER TH SLY ALG SD ELY SHORE
LINE TO INTER/W A LINE DRAWN ON A BRG OF W FROM POB, TH ON A BRG OF E
TO POB, EX RD, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
PIN 12-32-25-33-0025
THAT PRT OF GOVT LOT 5 LYG NLY & ELY OF THE C/L OF THE RUM RIVER, WLY
OF THE C/L OF MONITEAU BLVD NW, & NWLY OF FOL DESC LINE: COM AT SE COR
OF SD LOT, TH W ALG S LINE THEREOF 376.97 FT, TH N AT RTANG 787.28 FT, TH N
56 DEG 55 MIN 20 SEC W 448.51 FT, TH NWLY ON CURVE TO RT WITH RAD OF
1237.62 FT & CEN ANG OF 5 DEG 39 MIN 51 SEC 194.4 FT, TH N 47 DEG 55 MIN 20 SEC
W 121.76 FT, TH NWLY ON CURVETO RT WITH RAD OF 57.56 FT & CEN ANG OF 10
DEG 35 MIN 22 SEC 10.64 FT TO POB OF LINE TO BE DESC, TH S 48 DEG 44 MIN 58
SEC W 665 FT +OR- TO N SHORE OF RUM RIVER & THERE TERM, EX RD, SUBJ TO
EASE OFREC
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO XXX
A RESOLUTION DENYINGVARIANCES FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1671x' AVENUE
NW AND MANITEAU BOULEVARD NW, PIN'S 12-32-25-31-0024 AND 12-32-25-33-0025,
LEGALLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A
WHEREAS, the property owners have requested approval of variances to reduce the width of the
lot at the front yard setback; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning
Commission has conducted a public hearing on said variances; and
WHEREAS, as a result of such public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended denial of the variances based on the variance review criteria for granting a
variance under City Code 12-14-7 B and 13-5-9; and
WHEREAS, City Council completed a review of the variances, along with Planning and Zoning
Commission recommendation; and
WHEREAS, City Council denies the variances to reduce the required width at the front yard
setback from 300 feet to 102.36 feet; 300 feet to 102.69 feet; and 300 feet to 110.51 feet for the
future lot split of the existing lots; and
WHEREAS, based on the criteria for granting a variance under City Code 12-14-713 and 13-5-9,
City Council finds the following findings of fact to support the denial of the variance requests:
1. The Variances would alter the nature of the community as the surrounding properties are
significantly wider at the right-of-way and front setback lines.
2. The Variances would drastically alter natural resources around it.
3. The Variances would create more of an urban setting in a rural area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby denies
the variance requests to reduce the lot width at the front yard setback.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of 2018.
ATTEST CITY OF ANDOVER
Michelle Harmer, City Clerk
Julie Trude, Mayor
10
EXHIBIT A
Legal Descriptions
PIN 12-32-25-31-0024
THAT PRT OF GOVT LOT 6 SEC 12 TWP 32 RGE 25 LYG WLY OF C/L OF ARGON ST &
ITS NLY EXTN, EX THAT PRT DESC AS FOL: COM AT A PT ON S LINE OF GOVT LOT
5 SD SEC 343.97 FT W OF SE COR THEREOF, TH N AT RT ANGTO SD S LINE 1200 FT,
TH W AT RT ANG 33 FT, TH N AT RT ANG 10 FT, TH N 21 DEG 29 MIN 17 SEC E 130.76
FT, TH N 89 DEG 56 MIN 08 SEC W 190.67 FT TO POB AKA PT "A", TH S 89 DEG 56 MIN
08 SEC E 190.67 FT, TH N 21 DEG 29 MIN 17 SEC E 49.26 FT, TH N 963.08 FT, TH W AT
RT ANG 233 FT, TH S AT RT ANG 740.59 FT TH S 22 DEG 14 MIN 10 SEC E TO A PT
208.71 FT N OF POB AS MEAS AT RT ANG TO SD S LINE OF GOVT LOT 5, TH S 208.71
FT TO POB, ALSO EX THAT PRT OF SD GOVT LOT 6 DESC AS FOL, BEG AT SD PT
"A", TH N 89 DEG 56 MIN 08 SEC W 200 FT, TH N AT RT ANG TO SD S LINE OF GOVT
LOT 5 267.88 FT, TH E PRLL/W SD S LINE 175.71 FT, TH S 22 DEG 14 MIN 10 SEC E TO
A PT 208.71 FT N OF POB AS MEAS AT RT ANG TO SD S LINE, TH S 208.71 FT TO POB,
ALSO EX THAT PRT OF SD GOVT LOT 6 DESC AS FOL, COM AT SD PT "A", TH N 89
DEG 56 MIN 08 SEC W 200 FT TO POB, TH CONT N 89 DEG 56 MIN 08 SEC W 200 FT,
TH N AT RT ANG TO S LINE OF SD GOVT LOT 5 267.66 FT, TH E AT RT ANG TO
INTER/W A LINE DRAWN N FROM POB, TH S AT RT ANG 267.88FT TO POB, ALSO EX
THAT PRT OF GOVT LOT 6 DESC AS FOL, COM AT A PT ON S LINE OF GOVT LOT 5
SD SEC 343.97 FT W OF SE COR THEREOF, TH N, ASS BRG, AT RT ANG TO SD S LINE
1200 FT, TH W AT RT ANG 33 FT, THN AT RT ANG 10 FT, TH N 21 DEG 29 MIN 17 SEC
E 180.02 FT, TH N 963.08 FT TO POB, TH CONT N TO N LINE OF SD GOVT LOT 6, TH
WLY ALG SD N LINE TO ELY SHORE OF RUM RIVER TH SLY ALG SD ELY SHORE
LINE TO INTER/W A LINE DRAWN ON A BRG OF W FROM POB, TH ON A BRG OF E
TO POB, EX RD, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
PIN 12-32-25-33-0025
THAT PRT OF GOVT LOT 5 LYG NLY & ELY OF THE C/L OF THE RUM RIVER, WLY
OF THE C/L OF MONITEAU BLVD NW, & NWLY OF FOL DESC LINE: COM AT SE COR
OF SD LOT, TH W ALG S LINE THEREOF 376.97 FT, TH N AT RTANG 787.28 FT, TH N
56 DEG 55 MIN 20 SEC W 448.51 FT, TH NWLY ON CURVE TO RT WITH RAD OF
1237.62 FT & CEN ANG OF 5 DEG 39 MIN 51 SEC 194.4 FT, TH N 47 DEG 55 MIN 20 SEC
W 121.76 FT, TH NWLY ON CURVETO RT WITH RAD OF 57.56 FT & CEN ANG OF 10
DEG 35 MIN 22 SEC 10.64 FT TO POB OF LINE TO BE DESC, TH S 48 DEG 44 MIN 58
SEC W 665 FT +OR- TO N SHORE OF RUM RIVER & THERE TERM, EX RD, SUBJ TO
EASE OFREC
Date Created: June 06, 2018
Disclaimer: The provider makes no representation or warranties with respect to the reuse of this data. LOCATION MAP
Date Created: June 06, 2018
Disclaimer. The provider makes no representation or warranties with respect to the reuse of this data.
Iq
J
y
2 June 2018
tai
.a
CL
Planning Commission/Planning staff Q
City or Andover
Re: Russell/Lehn Property PIN# 12-32-25-31-0024, and PIN# 12-32-25-33-0015
This letter serves to request the City of Andover to review and approve the variance application
submitted for the Russell/Lehn property. The proposed land change has three planned parcels
that meet criteria for lots adjacent to the river including adequate building pad square footage
and primary and secondary septic sites, four acre minimum plots, river bluff and all other set-
backs except the lineal frontage requirement at the front setback. The current required 300' lineal
frontage at the set back (50') is requested to be approved at 100' lineal frontage and a variance is
sought by the owners in order create these three lots. The 100 lineal feet does not adversely
affect any of the three lots and there is ample space to accommodate driveways and maintenance
areas in each of the proposed lots. The proposed lots' lineal frontage measurements will
resemble other grandfathered lots in the neighborhood and will not be an unordinary
characteristic to the neighborhood.
Along with the planned parcels, the owners wish to provide a trail easement to the City of
Andover,(should the City decide to accept) that would connect the existing neighborhood to
Timber River Park and its respective neighborhood in order to make a scenic trail connection and
provide for a recreation amenity to the Community. The City would undertake at some point in
the future, the cost of construction of said trail, however a 15' trail easement would be provided
and cross lower river bottom portions of the land. It is proposed that this trail be created as a
Veteran's Memorial Scenic Rum River trail in special remembrance of its past owner WWII
Marine Corp Warrant Officer Clyde A. Russell and his loving wife Mary A. Russell. The owners
would request the City to consider 1.5 park dedication credits to be granted towards the donation
of said easement to be an amount in lieu of paying full park dedication credits on proposed three
parcels. Should the variance be approved, the owners would like to discuss with the City of
Andover other options in purchasing remaining acres of land. The owners request the Planning
Commission recommend the City Council approve said variance and consider trail easement
option. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Charles Lehn
Owner Representative
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes -June 12, 2018
Page 2
Page 5, line 35, `...the entire proposed Phase 1 concept. The development
purpose...'
Page 5, line 39, change Martins to Martin's
age 6, line 8, change us to use
P e 6, line 9, change Martins to Martin's
Pa g , line 32, change Martins to Martin's
Page 7, 'ne 1, `...inquired about the quality s€the homeowner's association...
Page 7, li 28, add comma after the word development
Page 8, line Valley View Drive'
Page 8, line 31, ..was she than originally shared...'
Page 8, line 35, `... 0 -feet of right-of-way and this...'
Page 9, line 5, `...a 1 truck ti
d to make a turns on 16e Avenue...'
Page 9, line 9, `...left th dais eting at 9:24 p.m....'
Page 9, line 23, change M ino Martin's
Page 9, line 36, `Valley rive'
Page 10, lines 17-18, change ins to Martin's
Page 12, line 32, `Valley View D e'
Motion by VanderLaan, seconded by Sims, t approve the minutes as revised. Motion
carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1 -present (Hudson), absent vote.
CHANGE AUGUST 14. 2018. REGULAR MEETING DATE AND LOCATION.
City Planner Hanson explained that due to primaries bein\nesda Tuesday, August 14,
2018, staff recommends rescheduling the meeting of Tuesst 14, to Wednesday,
August 15. In addition, the City Council Chambers is schbe remodeled so it is
also recommended that the location of the August meetined to the community
room of the Anoka County Sheriff's Office, 13301 HansonNW.Motion by Daninger, seconded by Hudson, to reschedule t 14, 018, meeting to
August 15,2018, and change the location from the Counci Chambers to
community roomat the Anoka County Sheriffs Office, son Bo levard NW.
Motion carried on'a 7-aves. 0 -nays. 0 -absent vote.
_L / CUPWO
Chairperson Nemeth indicated the agenda would be reordered to consider Item 6
Item 5.
PUBLIC HEARING. Variance Request to reduce the required width at the front yard
setback from 300 feet to 200 feet -167" Avenue NW and Maniteau Blvd. NW.
Chairperson Nemeth stated since he knows a party to the applicant, he will recuse himself
from commenting and voting on this item but will still direct the meeting.
l,�O
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes —June 12, 2018
Page 3
City Planner Hanson noted the purpose of this item is to hold a public hearing and take
input on a variance request for the properties located at 167`h Avenue NW and Maniteau
Boulevard NW to reduce the required width of the lots at the front yard setback to allow
for a future lot split.
City Planner Hanson reviewed the proposed variance request with the Commission. The
proposed variance requests are to reduce the required lot width at the front yard setback
from 300 feet to 101 feet, 102 feet, and 110 feet for the purpose of subdividing the two
properties into three lots. Per City Code, a property must have a 50 -foot width at the
street. She stated each of the lots would meet that requirement.
City Planner Hanson noted the existing two lots meet Code requirements for lot width,
depth, and area. However, if the lots are further subdivided, each lot will require a
variance for lot width at the front yard setback but will meet Code requirements of 50 -
foot lot width at the right-of-way. She presented an exhibit showing the proposed
variance request and sizes of surrounding
City Planner Hanson explained that as •shown on the concept lot split plan, if will create a
nonconforming landlocked property shown as Lot 4. At this time, the landowners are
working on a possible conservation easement over the property. If the land trust does not
obtain Lot 4, the property must be combined with the property to the north or an adjacent
property as to not create a landlockedparcel. This item will be discussed between staff
and the property owners.
City Planner Hanson presented the review criteria required for variance consideration,
noting the Comprehensive Plan and other adopted plans, such as the Transportation Plan
and City Codes; must be taken into consideration. She noted the staff report identifies
Code sections that pertain to this type of land split.
City Planner Hanson stated the Comprehensive Plan describes goals, objectives, and
policies that must be taken into consideration when the City is planning for the future of
the community. ,She reviewed the Land Use goal is to allow residential growth while
maintaining the quality of natural resources and amenities. In this case, the landowners
are currently working with a conservation agency to possibly place a conservation
easement on Lot 4, the northernmost lot. The conservation easement would protect the
resources and the property would be enhanced by planting native vegetation and restoring
natural wetlands on the property. City Planner Hanson stated the lots within the Rum
River development area must be a minimum of four acres and each of the proposed lots
exceed the 4 -acre minimum lot size so the density requirement is being met.
City Planner Hanson explained within the Transportation section, a goal is to enhance
accessibility by providing an interconnected multi -use trail system and the proposed trail
easement provides an accessible trail system that links residential neighborhoods and
park areas. She explained when the land to the north developed, staff wanted a trail
connection at the end of Argon to connect neighborhoods. But, that connection was
J-7
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes—June 12, 2018
Page 4
never made so staff sees the benefit of taking a trail easement through Lot 4 to link the
park areas if the variances are approved.
City Planner Hanson stated a Parks & Open Space goal is to promote, protect, preserve,
and enhance the City's natural and open space for the enjoyment of residents, protection
of water and air quality, and the preservation of wildlife habitat. The proposed plan for a
trail easement will provide passive recreational trails and allow public enjoyment of the
natural area.
City Planner Hanson stated the Transportation Plan's goals mention providing multi -
model, transportation options, and enhancing an accessible trail system. The proposed
trail easement will link neighborhoods and parks.
City Planner Hanson stated the City Code has variance criteria as well and since this
property is on the Rum River, City Code 13-5 Bluffland and Riverland Development,
regulates development in order to protect and preserve the, scenic, recreational, natural,
historical, and scientific values of the Rum River consistent with Statutes and the
Management Plan for the Rum River. Staff talked with Mr. Lein, the applicant, to discuss
the variance criteria. City Planner Hanson stated the request would use the property in a
reasonable manner, the lot width is met at public right-of-way, but variances are needed
at the setback. She noted the photograph in the; report shows the site is dense with
vegetation and a lot of large trees.
City Planner Hanson stated another thing to consider is that there would be an additional
building pad if the lot split moves forward. The view looking west will see a driveway
but the building pad is in the back by the River due to the contours of the land, bluff line,
and flood plain. When you look at the River view, the houses on the two lots closest to
the road cannot be seen from'the River. The house on Lot 2 may be able to be seen from
the River.
With regard to the plight of the owner, City Planner Hanson noted it is due to
circumstances unique to the property and not created by the landowner. She stated the
landowners have been splitting off lots, some in the 1960s and 1970s, but Codes evolve
over time so the lot size requirements have changed. The land has been in this family for
seven generations.
City Planner Hanson addressed the density requirement on the River, noting all lots meet
the 4 -acre minimum, setbacks from neighboring structures will be great enough to
maintain the rural character, and the houses will be buffered by the heavily vegetated
area. The site is heavily wooded and a minimal number of trees would be removed for
construction. These lots have more strict standards since they are on the River and no
clear cutting is allowed except on the building pad. Trees smaller than 4 inches in
diameter and underbrush can be cleared.
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes —June 12, 2018
Page 5
City Planner Hanson stated the variance is not going to increase the density, all have 4 -
acre minimums, it would be a residential development which is a permitted use in this
area, and the additional building pad (Lot 2) will not alter the character of the
neighborhood.
City Planner Hanson noted with the Comprehensive Plan and Transportation Plan, it is
the goal to interconnect trails with parks and neighborhoods. She explained when Timber
Rivers, the residential development to the north, was built the City recommended the
connection of the two neighborhoods; however, that trail easement was never obtained.
City Planner Hanson stated for agency reviews, City Code 13-5 Bluffland and Riverland
Development, regulates development along theRumRiver in a manner consistent with
Minnesota Statutes and the Management Plan for the Rum Rivera The City of Andover is
the governing unit to administer the Code; however, does need'to notify the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) of land use requests on the Rum River. She
stated she has notified the area hydrologist of this public hearing and provided the report.
He had acknowledged receipt of the information but has not'submitted comments.
City Planner Hanson described next steps if the variancesare granted. The lot split will
be completed administratively. The applicant will be required to submit grading plans,
soil borings, tree preservation plan, and surveys. The survey must reflect trail location.
A wetland delineation has been completed and is under review by the Lower Rum River
Water Management Organization (LRRWMO). The ',applicant and City staff will
continue to work together to ensure the goals of the Comprehensive Plan are met and the
Commission, Council, and staff comments are satisfactorily addressed.
City Planner Hanson,noted the meeting information includes a resident letter of support
and a petition of support. Today, staff received an e-mail which was provided to the
commissioners, from one of the landowners that will become part of the public record.
City Planner Hanson stated the Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to hold a
public hearing for the variance requests, compare the variance requests with the review
criteria of City Code 12-14-7, and make a recommendation of approval or denial based
on findings of fact to the City Council. She noted staff drafted resolutions with potential
findings of fact the Commission may want to consider when recommending approval or
denial of the variance requests. If the City Council approves the variance requests, then
the applicant will work with staff to begin the process of the lot split.
Chairperson Nemeth asked if the Commissioners had questions of staff.
Commissioner Koehler questioned, if there is no conservancy easement, then the lot
configuration is not known. City Planner Hanson explained the lots will absorb the
easement and become a little bit bigger.
in
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes —June 12, 2018
Page 6
Commissioner VanderLaan referenced the memo from Public Works Director/City
Engineer Berkowitz addressing ownership, maintenance, and development of the trail,
noting it is considered an interior trail, not identified as a regional trail. She asked how
the conversancy easement will be addressed when this property is developed. She stated
the report talked about the land trust, an organization tapped to assist with the trail, and
asked if it is federally or privately funded. Commissioner VanderLaan stated support for
the trail and linkage it would provide but asked if it would result in the City holding
property it does not have funds to develop or maintain.
City Planner Hanson explained this is a proposal from the landowners of the trail
easement and those questions will be worked out with the City Council and property
owner as to who will develop, own, and maintain the trail.
Commissioner Sims asked about the zoning of surrounding lots. City Planner Hanson
displayed a zoning map and stated it is all Rural Residential. Commissioner Sims asked
if .7 acre lots were the standard at the time it was developed,, City Planner Hanson stated
she does not know but now the lots range from 1.5 acres to 2 acres and others along the
River are 4 acres.
Motion by Daninger, seconded by Sims, to open the public hearing at 7:37 p.m. Motion
carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1 -present (Nemeth),'0-absent vote.
Charles Lehn, 499 165th Avenue NW, stated he is representing his family in this request.
He stated he is in the'seventh-generation ownership with this property and represents part
of 160 years of heritage on these properties, which goes back to their relatives who came
from Ireland to , find a better way of life. The owners now would like to relinquish
ownership of some of their properties and are asking the Planning Commission to
consider that their family has been there for auite some time and would like to retain
portions or me property.
With regard to the Conservancy for Lot 4, Mr. Lehn explained that would be addressed
by the owners who are negotiating with the Minnesota Land Trust. He noted the owners
had started with five lots but they were nonconforming, so the request was reduced to
four lots to meet the City's criteria and retain as much property as possible while selling
three lots to obtain as much'opportunity as possible. They have already taken steps with
the delineation. With the trail, there have been questions whether the City would be
interested in purchasing that piece of land but that did not occur. However, they are
aware of the desire to connect the two neighborhoods and propose a 15 -foot trail to
connect the two neighborhoods. He stated the property owners request the Planning
Commission recommend a veterans' memorial scenic river trail in special consideration
of his grandfather, a WWII veteran, and his loving wife. Mr. Lehn stated the Minnesota
Land Trust is very interested in this property and seeking other properties along the Rum
River so he is in continuous discussion with them and will let them know of the decision
tonight.
M
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes —June 12, 2018
Page 7
Mr. Lehn thanked City Planner Hanson for her assistance in getting to this point, noting
the trail can also provide a community amenity that will last forever as they will dedicate
the easement. But they are not in a position to develop the trail. He stated if approved,
this would have to be brought forward to the Park & Recreation Commission, so it can be
included in the Comp Plan that is currently being updated.
Commissioner Daninger stated he understands the cost of the trail and asked if the
variance is not granted and two lots are conforming, would the property owners still
dedicate the trail in honor of his grandfather, a WWII veteran. Mr. Lehn stated that has
not yet been discussed with the owners, noting they are trying to maximize the benefits of
the property.
Commissioner Daninger stated this property has been in the fancily for a long time and
asked if the land with such rich history, is for sale to the family or Will it be on the open
market. Mr. Lehn stated the property has not yet been appraised so that will be
considered in due time but to sell on the open market is one;ootion.
Chairperson Nemeth invited the public to come forward to make comment.
John Sweigert, 16636 Maniteau Boulevard; stated he lives two doors down and asked if
the variance is for a 200 -foot lot width or 100 -foot lot width. City Planner Hanson stated
there was a typo in the letter and clarified it is three lots 100 feet at the front yard setback.
Mr. Sweigert stated he has resided there for 20 years and loves the rural area. Before, he
lived in Champlin on the Mississippi River where there was a similar situation.
However, Champlin had sewer and water so that area has now been redeveloped into
100 -foot lots: Mr. Sweigert stated he had contacted the Met Council to ask when sewer
would be coming to this property, in Andover and was told 20 years, which has come and
gone. He asked if the City is prepared if he or others also want to split their lot.
Frank Skubitz, 16648 Maniteau Boulevard NW, stated he lives to the south of the
property under discussion. He stated they built their house, moved in 1983, and raised
their family. Thay..also purchased an additional pie -shaped lot in 2016 with an additional
100 feet of River frontage and large trees. Mr. Skubitz stated he purchased in this
neighborhood because of the lifestyle it allows with nature, quietness, and easy access to
roads to get to work. He stated when he saw the variance sign on the property, he wasn't
sure why it was needed unless it was for two lots on Maniteau Boulevard. If that were
the case, then he wouldn't be here tonight but then he got the notice and learned it was
for three properties.
Mr. Skubitz stated he talked to a family member and two neighbors and found the
property still met the de facto original standard of 200 feet of frontage on the road. He
stated if that was the case, he doesn't have a problem with the variance. But, he talked
with the City Planner on June 4 about the variance and frontage and on Wednesday, the
City Planner gave him the frontage dimensions. Mr. Skubitz stated he has no issue with
�1
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes —June 12, 2018
Page 8
the property being sold and not meeting the 300 -foot standard and appreciates staggering
the home locations but his question is three lots being jammed in with a variance, which
is not appropriate with the neighborhood and sets a negative precedent with other lots in
Andover where de facto standards are not being met. Mr. Skubitz stated he supported the
trail as there are a lot of pedestrians in the neighborhood and it would be a nice tie into
another neighborhood.
Barbara Anderson, 5421 165'h Lane NW, Ramsey, stated her concern is the location of
the future house closest to the River. She asked about the setback from the water as it is
across from her house. She stated she has had her house for 30 years and loves the scenic
waterway, deer, owls, and eagle nests in the location of the future house. Ms. Anderson
stated it is not unusual for her to see 15 to 30 deer in the wintertime and she is concerned
about losing the wildlife. Also, when using the River, she would like it to still appear
very wild and not a view of houses. Ms. Anderson stated she keeps her land as scenic as
possible with wildflowers. She asked how close the future house will be to the River.
City Planner Hanson stated she does not recall
and that would be part of the lot split consider
Mr. Lehn stated it is 150 feet from
Ms. Anderson stat
back from the RiIV
City Planner Hans
setbacks would be
Ms. Anderson: ,
it wa
so it
to be met. She
it will meet the setbacks
1 to be 400 feet back and wants it as far
atural, wild, and beautiful as it is now.
use would be decided by the owner and
she will verify that distance and inform
Mr. Lehn stated it is their intent to preserve as much nature as possible and the only trees
anticipated to be cleared.are for the building pad. That is also why they are working with
the Minnesota Land Trust to create.a conservancy. He stated the request for three lots is
not unreasonable, so he hopes that is what the Planning Commission will consider
John Sweigert, 16636 Maniteau Boulevard, stated he will withdraw his name from the
petition because he thought it was for a 200 -foot lot width.
Chairperson Nemeth again asked if there was additional public input. He acknowledged
the e-mail received from Rosella (Russell) Baker, one of the current owners, in support of
the variance requests that is part of the public record.
Motion by Daninger, seconded by VanderLaan, to close the public hearing at 8:00 p.m.
Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1 -present (Nemeth), 0 -absent vote.
Commissioner Daninger referenced the map and asked where the addresses are located
for those who signed the petition, noting not many properties are adjacent to the variance
MI
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes —June 12, 2018
Page 9
request. City Planner Hanson stated she spoke with the property owner across the street
who supported the variance if the property is not clear cut.
Commissioner Koehler asked whether that neighbor was aware the variance was for a
100 foot width. City Planner Hanson answered in the affirmative.
Commissioner Koehler stated the property owner can build a home currently on Lot 2
without any variances. City Planner Hanson confirmed that was correct. Commissioner
Koehler noted whether or not the variances are approved, that house can be built. City
Planner Hanson confirmed that Lots 1 and 3 both have building pads.
Commissioner Koehler asked if setbacks
Ramsey. City Planner Hanson stated thi
home in Ramsey would be closer to the 1
Hanson stated that is correct.
River change between Andover and
Commissioner Koehler asked if no
this one can be placed. City Planner
Commissioner Hudson asked if there are many properties that could meet'the size criteria
and be split into two lots with 100 -foot setbacks. City Planner Hanson stated there are
not, as most are at 1 acre and a 2:5 acre minimum is required in Rural Residential. Also,
along the River you need 4 acres.
Commissioner VanderLaan stated it is noteworthy that 50 years ago in April, the Wild
and Scenic River Act was passed by the national government to protect our riverways.
Now, the Planning Commission. has an example in front of them and a comment by
Ramsey to protect the river. She noted there is a delineation line to protect the wildlife
and waterway, which is federal law so a home cannot be built in that area. Commissioner
VanderLaan stated year later, the Shoreland rezoning stopped a lot of things and helped
protect the River, noting the 4 -acre requirement preserves wetlands, trees, and the desire
of long-term residents to protect and preserve this property. Commissioner VanderLaan
stated she supports the proposal as it is
Commissioner Loehlein stated from his perspective, he is supportive of the variance as it
maintains the 4 acres and does not violate intended density. He noted the unique nature
of Maniteau Boulevard and 1`67°i Avenue coming together in a point, which creates a
challenge with the shape of the lot, so approval would not set a precedent. He stated not
meeting the 300 -foot lot width requirement is not a problem because what is seen from
the road is the driveway.
Commissioner Koehler stated at the last meeting, the Planning Commission considered a
similar issue for a Planned Urban Development where the main issue was the front
setback being too small and the Commission voted against it based mainly on that issue.
He noted the requested front setback in this application, when compared to the other
properties along the same street, is about one-third smaller. Commissioner Koehler
stated he wanted to raise a challenge by asking what is different about this setback being
okay.
93
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes—June 12, 2018
Page 10
Commissioner Loehlein stated for him, this request does not alter the character of the
neighbor and it is only at the end of the driveway where it could be seen. In addition, this
request is for three lots as opposed to 30 -some lots.
Commissioner Koehler stated he wrestles with Mr. Lehn's comment that he was here
long before the City and while that does not mean the family has special or different
rights than others, it should be noted and taken into account that they could have done
this long ago before the City was incorporated, or the laws were enacted. He noted this is
a hodgepodge neighborhood, but he thinks this proposal breaks up the front lot line along
the street. But when you take the neighborhood at a larger, scale, then it fits as it is a
hodgepodge neighborhood. Commissioner Koehler stated at this point, he is undecided.
Commissioner Sims stated his concern is the fourth lot to the north and not knowing what
will be happening with it at this time. He stated he would feel better voting on this once
it is known what will happen or if it will be sold to the Minnesota Land Trust. If not sold,
he asked if the Planning Commission would again see this request.
City Planner Hanson explained the approval resolution addresses what would have to
happen with Lot 4. In addition, the two lots would not change if the Minnesota Land
Trust does not take Lot 4. It would be absorbed by the other two lots. She stated either
way, it -will not come before the Planning Commission as it would be an administrative
lot split.
Commissioner VanderLaan thanked Commissioner Koehler for the challenge and noted
in retrospect, all were struggling to figure out the PUD at the last meeting. She stated it
was not the setback she voted against but the density. She stated she looks at this density
as being a large piece of land, but she does not want to see more lots in this area and the
Planning, Commission is only addressing the variance request to the setback at this time,
not the trail issue. She stated the Planning Commission has to ask if it is or is not
Mr. Lehn offered a clarification that if they worked with the Minnesota Land Trust, the
property owner would retain ownership of Lot 4. They do not intend to sell the
conservancy easement to the Minnesota Land Trust.
Commissioner Sims referenced Page 3 detailing City Code criteria to consider a variance
requiring practical difficulties. He stated the applicant has indicated they want to get the
most out of this opportunity, so he questioned whether that is a practical difficulty or if it
is the pie -shape of the lot that creates the difficulty.
Commissioner Koehler stated he wrestles with the same question.
Oq
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes—June 12, 2018
Page 11
Commissioner Loehlein noted the draft resolution recommending approval of the
variances contains findings of fact to support the approval. If the Planning Commission
supports recommending denial, rational would need to be added to that draft resolution.
Motion by Loehlein, seconded by VanderLaan, to recommend to the City Council
approval of variance requests to reduce the required width at the front yard setback from
300 feet to 100 feet for the purpose of subdividing the two properties into three lots at
167th Avenue NW and Maniteau Boulevard NW. Motion ,;failed on a 3 -ayes (Loehlein,
Hudson, VanderLaan), 3 -nays (Daninger, Koehler, Sims), 1 -present (Nemeth), 0 -absent
vote.
Commissioner Daninger stated he is very
when the property can remain as two lots.
gain to get three lots. In addition, two lot
ownership would stay in the family but tb
a large variance and even though it may lc
the
reason for a variance
.,e to create economic
d appease. He stated he had asked if the
no bearing on his vote He stated this is
,d, he will: follow the
Commissioner Koehler referenced the comment by Commissioner Sims asking about the
rationale for the variance, which he finds is to sell three;,lots. He noted the two lots can
still be built on and the conversancy can still be created. Commissioner Koehler stated if
the request had been to cut the requirement by a couple feet, that would be okay, but this
is a massive change. He does not see anything here but economic gain to sell three lots
instead of two lots and the conversancy is not part of the variance consideration.
Chairperson Nemeth stated the Planning Commission is at an impasse and asked whether
one member would need to change their position, or another motion presented.
Motion by Koehler, seconded by Sims, to recommend to the City Council denial of
variance, requests to reduce the required width at the front yard setback from 300 feet to
100 feet for the purpose of subdividing, the two properties into three lots at 167`h Avenue
NW and Maniteau Boulevard NW, based on the following rationale:
1. The variances,would alter the nature of the community as the properties to the left
and right down the street are significantly wider at the front and setback lines.
2. The variances would drastically alter community that values natural resources around
it.
3. The variances would create more of an urban setting.
Commissioner Loehlein stated he will support this motion for denial as it moves the
application forward to the City Council but is not necessarily in full agreement with the
rational stated by Commissioner Koehler.
Commissioner VanderLaan stated that's a sensible observation because if denied, it will
go to the City Council, so they can discuss it and embrace the comprehensive ideas such
as preservation of land and reducing the number of lots to two rather than three. She
noted obviously, there are some other considerations and a strong economic
�5
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes —June 12, 2018
Page 12
consideration, so she will change her vote in order to move it to City Council to resolve
the application as the Planning Commission is only advisory.
Motion carried on a 5 -ayes (Daninger, Koehler, Loehlein, Sims, VanderLaan), 1 -nay
(Hudson), 1 -present (Nemeth), 0 -absent vote.
City Planner Hanson stated this item would be before the Council at the July 17, 2018,
City Council meeting.
HEARING: To consider City Code Amendments to Title 12, Accessory
Com\torevise
y Development Director Janish noted the purpose of this item is to hold a
publiing and take input on a potential modification to the City Code related to
access ctures (portable items) and sizes and make a recommendation to the City
Coune ted the Planning Commission considered this amendment in late 2017,
and a rec endation to the City Council. On November 14, 2017, the City
Counbled acti n and reviewed the, proposal at several Work Sessions. During that
revieCity Coun '1, staff was directed to clean up the ordinance language to make it
easieead, co 7m
end and allow architectural features compatible to principal
strucin lieu of prop' iting steel'' exterior :wall sheathing ;(i.e., pole sheds). Staff
workgether to revise draft ordinance, which was considered at the April 24,
2018Council' Work Sess n. At that meeting, staff was directed to bring the draft
ordinhrough the,adontion n cess.
Ito l emp
related to
acres' has been modif
acres or greater vs. the
meeting packet, notin;
should the lot size be c
3. This change will aN
arrent 3 acres or greater.
it identifies the location
nged to 2.5 acres.
d highlights of the revised ordinance
Ding and storage containers' language
compatible language is included; and,
`less than 2.5 acres' vs. `less than 3
v for vertical steel siding on lots 2.5
k3e referenced the map included in the
v ere steel buildings could be built
Community Development Director Janish noted staff hasp I
vided a full draft version and
the original version of the ordinance instead of a redli%aubl
py. He stated staff
recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission conductic Hearing to review
and discuss the proposed ordinance and consider a recommento the City Council.
Chairperson Nemeth asked whether the Commissioners had questions\f staff.
Commissioner Sims asked if he needed to recuse himself since he own a 2.5 -acre lot.
Community Development Director Janish stated he would not need to Nt if he felt
conflicted, he could certainly abstain. Commissioner Koehler stated since Cokmissioner
M-
C
C I T Y O F
,ND OVE.
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
MEMO MMOOM
TO: Stephanie Hanson, City Planner
FROM: David Berkowitz, Director of Public Works/City Engineerv3
J��yi , Asst. City Engineer
DATE: X2018
REFERENCE: Lehn/Russell Property/Variance Request/Review #1
The following comments are regarding Review #1:
1. Lot 4 is proposed to be landlocked. It either would need to be attached to Lot 3, or to
another existing property to the north or east that has road frontage.
2. The proposed trail shown on the plan is not identified as a regional trail in the City's
Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, it would be considered an interior trail and the developer
would be responsible for the cost of constructing the trail. Easement would also be
required from the property to the north for the trail to extension.
3. Provide a 15' wide Vehicle Maintenance Access and Trail Easement along the east side
of Lot 3 up to the northern property line. It is currently shown as 10'. Typical easement
for this purpose are 20', but due to the limited lot pad space on Lot 3, 15' would be
sufficient in this case. Construct a class 5 base with topsoil/seed on top. This is used to
maintain a control valve that prevents water from the Rum River backflowing into the
property and provides access to other storm sewer infrastructure. Moving the trail east
from it's current location would require some tree removal as currently laid out.
4. A permit will be required from the Lower Rum River Watershed Management
Organization as more than 1 acre will be disturbed.
5. Floodway and Flood Plain boundaries and elevations must be identified on the plans.
Drainage and Utility Easements shall be dedicated in all areas encompassing the 100 -
year flood elevation of the Rum River (861.0).
6. Please review all City Codes for compliance.
7. Additional comments pending further review.
Note: It is a requirement that the Developer respond to each of these items in writing (qet
digital copy from City and type responses below original comment) when re -submitting
the revised plat to the City. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Jason Law, Assistant
City Engineer at (763) 767-5130 or David Berkowitz, Director of Public Works/City Engineer at
(763) 767-5133.
Stephanie Hanson
From: LeeAnn Horton <Ikhorton763@outlook.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 9:48 AM
To: Stephanie Hanson
Subject: Variance hearing
For the record Harvey and I have no problem with approving the request of variances for PIN 12-32-25-31-0022
32-25-33-0025.
Any further information needed from us contact us.
LeeAnna Horton
Sent from my iPad
June 18, 2018
RE: Variance request to reduce the required width at the front yard setback from 300 feet to
200 feet -167th Avenue NW and Maniteau Blvd. NW
Dear Mayor, City Counilmembers and City Planner
I, Bette Frank and my husband Gerald Frank, are property owners at 5315 167th Avenue NW, Andover
MN 55304. We are writing to express our deep concern about the Variance and the distubance it will
cause with the excessive traffic and noise through our neighborhood. My parents never intended to
have three lots on those two parcels when they developed this neighborhood. It was understood that
if it were ever to be sold, it was intended to be one to two parcels with the lowland included with the
second parcel to the north.
Thank you for your help in this matter.
Sincerely,
Bette and Gerald Frank
5315 167th Avenue NW
Andover MN 55304
02 June 2018
This is a request for support towards a land use change and variance in order to create three (four
acre) buildable lots on the "intersection" of Maniteau Blvd and 167ie Lane NW for the property
owned by Mr. and Mrs. Irwin Russell, Mr. and Mrs. Arnold Reese, Mr. and Mrs. Richard Lehn,
Ms. Rosella Baker, and Ms. Gail Hemsworth, all heirs to the late Mr. and Mrs. Clyde A. Russell
family. The three proposed four acre parcels, (which are portions of PIN 12-32-25-31-0024,
28.39 acres and PIN 12-32-25-33-0015, 6.86 acres) all meet lot acreage requirements, buildable
house and septic square footage amounts, and all river bluff criteria except the lot width
dimensions at the front setback. The minimum lineal feet per current requirements are 300' at the
front setback and for these three proposed lots, the requested variance to the city is to allow a
100 lineal feet at front setback for each lot. There is no interference with driveways or any other
known reason to require the arbitrary 300'. The owners therefore, are requesting a variance be
granted to allow this setback dimension to be approved. Again, all other criteria to create these
lots will be met per city requirements. Other lots in the area were grandfathered in and do not
meet the 300' or river acreage now, and therefore this is not an unordinary characteristic for
parcels in this neighborhood.
The owners will also allow the City of Andover, (should it choose to do so), to utilize a trail
easement that would connect the neighborhood in general to the Timber River Park to the north
and its collective neighborhood community via the lower river bottom portions of the parcels.
The owners would like to dedicate this trail easement for public use as the Veteran's Scenic
Memorial Rum River Trail with special dedication to WWII Veteran U.S. Marine Corp Warrant
Officer Clyde Russell and his loving wife Mary Russell. Please support this variance approval
and the land use change associated with these parcels as the owners desire to sell their
collaborative ownership in this property. Your support will be presented to the City Planning
Commission and City Council in their respective meetings when this topic is addressed.
Thank you on behalf of all owners associated
Sincerely,
Irwin Russell
Please support by signature and address below:
3o
sr- A -/W. SsyQll-l",
c
c
AcroN
� � � t�c{e �� �� 7� 7 � rcan ST i'lil� �v✓.�r N1� 5���
Notes: PUD/Scenic River
Lot Layout -
Proposed Minimum Width -200ft
Minimum Area -4 acres
Fysb: SDR
Sysb: 10 ft 110 it
Rysb: 50 it
13,600 SF minimum buildable area
501t min frontage at street
150 fl OHWL Setback
OWH+853.0
Floodplain -861.0
Bluff location based on Chapter
Shoreland Management -
Top of Bluff- higher point of 50ft segment
With average slope exceeding 18%
Bluff Impact Zone - Bluff & land located
Within 20ft from top of bluff
WE
_Conce tPlan 3 Lot -051718__- P SATHRE-BERGDUIST. INQ ANDOVER.LEHN/RUSSELL PROP_______ X40.°"""r""1VPFBptlmB4CfOR"1O9�1e11c'0 CHARLIE LEHN-- - ucocm..�usE ,w..os `c, MINNESOTA
W
Notes: PUDfScenic RNer
Lot Layout -
Proposed Minimum Width -20011
Minimum Area -4 acres
Fysb: 50 It
Sysb: 10 it 110 it
Rysb: 50 it
13,600 SF minimum buildable area
5011 min frontage at street
150 it OHWL Setback
OWH- 853.0
Floodplaln-861.0
Bluff location based on Chapter4
Shoreland Management -
Top of Bluff- higher point of 50ft segment
with average slope exceeding 18%
Bluff Impact Zone - Bluff & land located
within 20ft from top of bluff
°H mud
n
a Lot -051718
LL PROPERTYIE LEHN 2
n`W
1
33
C 1 T 1' O F`
NDb 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
J
o The amendment is in the best interest of the City of Andover as 0 W
determined by the City Council (D U
Zu)O
• Review Comprehensive Plan amendments concerning a proposed land use ¢ a
change with the following criteria: W C7 Z
> W
o Conditions have changed since the present land use designation w Z =) W
established such to warrant the proposed amendment or the present lai W O _>
use designation is in error Z F
�gw
CL
o The proposed land use is compatible with surrounding land uses and wi M
the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan
U
o There is capacity of public systems, facilities and services to serve ti
proposed land use and capacity of these systems to serve other planne .
land uses is not adversely affected
o Agreement can be reached for the applicant of the proposed land use to
pay for any increased capacity of public systems, facilities and services
required to serve the proposed land use
o Potential impacts by the proposed land use on natural resources including
vegetation, wetlands, floodplain and other natural features can be avoided
or sufficiently mitigated as determined by the City Council
o To ensure a transition or buffer between urban and rural residential zoning
districts
Land Use Goals, Objectives and Policies
Goal 4: Allow residential growth while maintaining the quality of natural
resources and amenities
Objective: Clearly define areas for urban and rural residential development
Objective: Promote orderly growth to ensure efficient utilization and delivery of
community services
Objective: Prevent extension of infrastructure that is inconsistent with the
Comprehensive Plan
Objective: Work cooperatively with resource protection agencies and
organizations to minimize the impact of development on natural
resources and amenities
Objective: Create opportunities for the city to preserve open space
and natural amenities through review of development proposals
and implementation of the Parks and Open Space Plan
39
T fJYL
2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
Policies:
• Maintain a Municipal Urban Service Area (MUSA) Boundary to define the
boundary between the Developing Community and Rural Residential planning
area designations of the 2030 Regional Development Framework
• Stage urban development within the MUSA Boundary to ensure orderly growth
and cost efficient expansion of infrastructure
• Review and update the staging plan periodically to address changes in times and
conditions
• Prohibit platting of property without municipal sewer and water within the MUSA
Boundary
• Restrict lot splits without municipal sewer and water within the MUSA Boundary
® Encourage infill development within the MUSA Boundary with appropriate
transitions to existing neighborhoods
• Allow rural development outside of the MUSA Boundary consistent with the Rural
Residential Land Use Designation
t-
• Require existing conditions information to be provided during the development
review process to allow evaluation of opportunities to preserve and protect
natural features and open space
• Engage local watershed management organizations and other appropriate
agencies and organizations in the review of development proposals
Goal 5: Encourage appropriate economic growth and redevelopment
Objective: Develop a diversified tax base through balanced development of
commercial, light industrial, and residential properties
Objective: Create a downtown area by aggregating commercial land uses
along Bunker Lake Boulevard between Hanson Boulevard and
Crosstown Boulevard
Objective: Select strategic locations for neighborhood and community
commercial sites and establish design performance standards for
such uses that promote quality site design and compatible land use
arrangements
Objective: Prevent the intensification of neighborhood commercial areas that
may negatively affect surrounding residential properties
NDOVER 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
Policies:
• Adhere to best management practices and all components of the Implementati(
Plan during the planning, construction and maintenance of the transportation
system
• Separate non -motorized traffic from arterial and collector roadways
• Encourage joint parking facilities to conserve land
Goal: Enhance accessibility by providing an interconnected multi-
use trail system
Objective: Provide an accessible trail system that links residential
neighborhoods, commercial developments, and park areas
Objective: Utilize multiple funding sources to complete the regional and local
trail systems
Objective: Coordinate trail construction with street improvement projects, new
development, expansion and redevelopment projects
Policies:
• Maintain a map of existing and future local and regional trails and coordinate trail
planning, construction and maintenance in the Capital Improvement Plan
• Fund regional trail system improvements adjacent to residential properties with
trail fees collected from new residential developments
• Require regional trail construction adjacent to commercial and industrial
properties, where shown on the trails plan, in conjunction with development,
expansion and redevelopment projects
• Require local trail construction adjacent to residential, commercial and industrial
properties, where shown on the trails plan, in conjunction with development,
expansion and redevelopment projects
• Develop trails in accordance with the American Association of State Highway
Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards
• Coordinate trail and sidewalk improvements, where appropriate, with Anoka
County and neighboring cities
10
35
U)
w
N�
�W
`U{ m
Z0
aQ
w0
> c9
ZZ
w0
_PV)
Ir
o:
�0ZI
O
0Za
�z
Goal 2: Promote, protect, preserve and enhance the City's natural
and open space for the enjoyment of residents, protection of water
and air quality and the preservation of wildlife habitat
Objectives.
Consider development of passive, nature -related recreation or
conservancy areas on sites found to be suitable for these purposes
b. Identify appropriate areas for preservation through analysis of
natural features, the Site Selection Criteria established in the Parks
and Open Space Plan and the Land Use Plan
C. Plan for and Provide connections with the park and trail systems in a
manner that both preserves and allows public enjoyment of natural areas
d. Seek to provide buffer areas adjacent to significant natural resources and
parks
Policies:
• Work collaboratively with property owners in the preservation of open space
• Permanently protect open space with conservation easements, even when fee
title acquisition and other methods are used.
• Prepare, implement and monitor the effectiveness of conservation plans that
address the specific characteristics of the various types of natural areas
• Utilize the Open Space Advisory Commission to advise the Council on matters
concerning preservation of open space
12
31.-�
C 1 T O i
ND6�
2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
• Accept only lands suitable for park and recreation purposes as fulfillment of the
dedication
0 ¢ W
parkland requirements.
(D UU
• Utilize the Capital Improvement Plan to schedule replacement of existing park
J
:5U a0
facilities and installation of new facilities
w a z
>Z<
• Utilize the Park and Recreation Commission to advise the Council on matters
z w W
relating to parks, recreation and park facilities
w Oa >
WP
• Provide regulations and policies for park use and park dedication
C)
a Y Lu
M
• Consider the adopted Guidelines for Field Usage by Youth Athletic Association
U aO
• Work cooperatively with other organizations and government agencies to
enhance local and regional park systems
Goal 2: Promote, protect, preserve and enhance the City's natural
and open space for the enjoyment of residents, protection of water
and air quality and the preservation of wildlife habitat
Objectives.
Consider development of passive, nature -related recreation or
conservancy areas on sites found to be suitable for these purposes
b. Identify appropriate areas for preservation through analysis of
natural features, the Site Selection Criteria established in the Parks
and Open Space Plan and the Land Use Plan
C. Plan for and Provide connections with the park and trail systems in a
manner that both preserves and allows public enjoyment of natural areas
d. Seek to provide buffer areas adjacent to significant natural resources and
parks
Policies:
• Work collaboratively with property owners in the preservation of open space
• Permanently protect open space with conservation easements, even when fee
title acquisition and other methods are used.
• Prepare, implement and monitor the effectiveness of conservation plans that
address the specific characteristics of the various types of natural areas
• Utilize the Open Space Advisory Commission to advise the Council on matters
concerning preservation of open space
12
3-7
2. Where a setback pattern from the ordinary high water mark has already
been established on both sides of a proposed building site, the setback of
the proposed structure may be allowed to conform to that pattern. This
Z
g
provision shall apply to lots that do not meet the minimum lot width
19
requirements in Subsection 13-5-56 of this chapter. (Ord. 223, 8-19-1997)
> z
13-5-9: VARIANCES: Variances to the strict provisions of this chapter may
M
r -W
ow o a
be granted as provided in City Code 12-14-7 and as follows
O Z O
(Amended Ord. 407, 6-21-11):
❑ >
ZW
A. Granting of the variance is not contrary to the purpose and intent of the
O U O
zoning provisions herein established by these standards and criteria, and
is consistent with the Management Plan for the Rum River.
m
B. A variance may not be granted to allow any use which is not a permitted
or conditional use in the Rum River land use district. (Amended Ord. 407,
6-21-11)
C. Granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality
as established by the Management Plan for the Rum River. (Ord. 223, 8-
19-1997; amd. 2003 Code)
13-5-10: PLATS:
A. Copies To State: Copies of all plats within the boundary of the Rum River
land use district shall be forwarded to the Commissioner within ten (10)
days of approval by the City Council.
B. Inconsistent Plats: Approval of a plat which is inconsistent with this
chapter is permissible only if the detrimental impact of the
inconsistency is more than overcome by other protective characteristics
of the proposal. All inconsistent plats approved by the city must be
certified in accordance with Section 13-5-13 of this chapter. (Ord. 223,
8-19-1997)
13-5-11: AMENDMENTS:
A. Amendments Authorized; Certification: This chapter may be amended
whenever the public necessity and the general welfare require such
amendments by the procedure specified in this section. Amendments to
this chapter must be certified by the Commissioner as specified in
Section 13-5-13 of this chapter.
B. Initiation Of Amendment; Application: Amendments to this chapter
may be initiated by a petition to the Planning and Zoning Commission
or by action of the City Council. An application for an amendment
El
CHAPTER 5
BLUFFLAND AND RIVERLAND DEVELOPMENT
SECTION:
13-5-1:
Policy And Authorization
13-5-2:
Purpose
13-5-3:
General Provisions
13-5-4:
Definitions
13-5-5:
Scenic River District Regulations And Requirements
13-5-6:
Administration Of Provisions
13-5-7:
Permits Required
13-5-8:
Nonconforming And Substandard Uses
13-5-9:
Variances
13-5-10:
Plats
13-5-11:
Amendments
13-5-12:
Conditional Use Permits
13-5-13:
Certification Procedures
13-5-14:
Violation; Penalties
13-5-1: POLICY AND AUTHORIZATION: These provisions are for the
controlling of bluffland and riverland development in order to protect and
preserve the scenic, recreational, natural, historical and scientific values of the
Rum River in Andover in a manner consistent with Minnesota Statutes and the
Management Plan for the Rum River. (Ord. 223, 8-19-1997)
13-5-2: PURPOSE: The purpose of this chapter is to:
A. Establish a scenic river district along the bluffland and shoreland of
the Rum River as required by the Management Plan for the Rum
River.
B. Regulate within the Rum River district, a land use district, the area of the
lots, and the length of bluffland and water frontage suitable for building
sites.
C. Regulate the setback of structures and sanitary waste treatment facilities
from bluff lines and shorelines to protect the existing and/or natural
scenic values, vegetation, soils, water quality, floodplain areas, and
bedrock from disruption by manmade structures or facilities.
D. Regulate alterations of the natural vegetation and topography.
31
E. Maintain property values and prevent poorly planned development.,
i
F. Conserve and protect the natural scenic values and resources of
the Rum River and maintain a high standard of environmental
quality.
G. Comply with Minnesota Statutes and the Management Plan for the Rum
River. (Ord. 223, 8-19-1997)
13-5-3: GENERAL PROVISIONS:
A. Jurisdiction: The jurisdiction of this chapter shall include all lands
designated within the Rum River land use district within the jurisdiction of
Andover as defined in the Management Plan for the Rum River.
B. Compliance With Provisions: The use of any land within the Rum River
land use district; the size and shape of lots; the use and location of
structures on lots; the installation and maintenance of water supply and
waste disposal facilities; the filling, grading, lagooning, or dredging of any
river area; the cutting of vegetation or alteration of the natural topography
within the district; and the subdivision of land shall be in full compliance
with the terms of this chapter and other applicable regulations.
C. Interpretation And Application: In their interpretation and application, the
provisions of this chapter shall be held to be minimum requirements, and
shall not be deemed a limitation or repeal of any powers or rights granted
by Minnesota Statutes.
D. Severability: It is hereby declared to be the intent of the City that
several provisions of this chapter are separable in accordance with the
following:
1. If any court of competent jurisdiction shall adjudge any provision of this
chapter to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect any other provisions
of this chapter not specifically included in said judgment.
2. If any court of competent jurisdiction shall adjudge invalid the
application of any provision of this chapter to a particular property,
building, or other structure, such judgment shall not affect the application
of said provision to any other property, building, or structure not
specifically included in said judgment.
E. Abrogation And Greater Restrictions: It is not intended by this chapter to
repeal, abrogate or impair any existing easements, covenants, deed
restrictions, or land use controls. Where this chapter imposes greater
restrictions, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail. (Ord. 223, 8-19-
zI0
462.354 subdivision 2, and Minn. Stat. 462.357, subdivision 6, shall have
the authority to hear requests for variances from the requirements of the
zoning ordinance and other sections of the City Code where variances
z Q
are authorized, including restrictions placed on nonconformities.
O W
(Amended Ord. 407, 6-21-11)
g
B. Review Criteria:
Z
wa (DW
UJ
U
U
1. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the
Q ¢
general purposes and intent of the official control and when the variancesz
U
are consistent with the comprehensive plan. (Amended Ord. 407, 6-21-11)
o >
N
2. Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance
establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the official
control. 'Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting
of a variance, means:
a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a
reasonable manner not permitted by an official control;
b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to
the property not created by the landowner;
c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of
the locality;
d. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical
difficulties. (Amended Ord. 407, 6-21-11)
C. Conditions Authorized: The City Council may impose conditions in the
granting of variances. A condition must be directly related to and must
bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance.
(Amended Ord. 407, 6-21-11)
D. Specific Variances Authorized: No variance may be granted that would
allow any Use that is not allowed in the zoning district in which the subject
property is located, except as follows: (Amended Ord. 407, 6-21-11)
1. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined
in Minn. Stat. 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with the official
controls. (Amended Ord. 407, 6-21.-11)
2. Variances may be granted for the temporary use of a one family
dwelling as a two family dwelling. (Amended Ord. 407, 6-21-11)
E. Procedure: The procedure for granting variances is as follows:
1. Request For Variance; Fee: A person desiring a variance shall fill out
and submit to the Community Development Director a request for variance
SITE PHOTO
ti
LOOKING WEST
20,000 SF \
\, 1 . �\!_swrrl�y+aotrzovc li—
1
3
180.854 sf
4.15Ac
15,01
--------------__
-� \ J/1 I1Ill ��iilllt - i
i i •li % Il �ili�ill. .:
�I
1 ------`-
-------------
14.500 SF I� 1 •1 I \ /' `i
� \ 1
til
167TH AVENUE NW
VARIANCE EXHIBIT
Date Created: July 12, 2018
Disclaimer. The provider makes no representation or warranties with respect to the reuse of this data.
143
Andover
General Mapping
Map
AN OVER
17092
17069 5218>
51
170515
z
-.
7'081
17051
t'-
T
"
17068
- 17037 17033
E
17036
�
-�: -
17021 17019
y
:x
17022
C
1.7624
16993 16997
7004
�
a
5347
- -
16974 5221
O
16980
5191
— >_
5356
5314
276
5234 51tS
E
FL
16850
d
16831
I16806I
,
'
.--{'.-
-
16757
16752
"
167371
-16732:'y
r
5315 5261
16717
<
16665
'
16647 16656.
5151
5131
ti _
.]6645
1666 48 16627
1 s
16636
16632
1.6636
16622
„
\;
16612
16610
16604
16566'
llitill9
1 Ei558
1 (1550
16548'
- --- 416529
I [1530
Date Created: July 12, 2018
Disclaimer. The provider makes no representation or warranties with respect to the reuse of this data.
i
16lNU LN
AN
ovER Andover General Mapping M---
Date Created: June 01, 2018
Disclaimer., The provider makes no representation or warranties with respect to the reuse of this data.
IL
r
O
O
J
LL
¢
W
LL
M
f`
FuruRE-
3
irr
/ _— ------ — ___ — v 1,
I � I
\ \` \ % `1,11•' I' ` – \: 1, ' J ' t \\
If1
`. •S_ ma.- .� _ `�^a51 �� `\ r• ' - mac. ,
r"'uK,."�'�_ '��`• -ws_ _ -� VENUE NW I
s
167TH A � \
� I
I U K ai. l ``.,
ss01s SF -°'0.i `71'iA�G.
7
—r cJ
....
/' i -r_� \ 1 Vim— , • •�`__"
ER
W \\
U
R MR
`-j I'._ u6�'++9s:. zs-eai7s§�=--�— \\'\���\�\ ,J1 r� f�,%'__°'r 1' �.� •
Notes: PUD/Scenic River
Lot Layout -
Proposed Minimum Width - 100ft (at front
setback)
Minimum Area -4 acres
Fysb: 50 ft
Sysb: 10 ft / 10 ft
Rysb: 50 ft
13,600 SF minimum buildable area
50ft min frontage at street
150 ft OHWL Setback
O W H= 853.0
Floodplain =861.0
Bluff location based on Chapter 4
Shoreland Management -
Top of Bluff - higher point of 50ft segment
with average slope exceeding 18%
Bluff Impact Zone - Bluff & land located
within 20ft from top of bluff
100 50 B 50 100 201
�i�il�l I I I I 0
SG1tE IN FEET
UR WiK�ry NU. I CT I unitI
—_---_IfLVIIIUNs —_—_—II
uSEONCLUDINGCOPYING,DISTRIBUTION,ANWORCONV MCEOF IHFREBY CERRFY THAT THIS PIAN DRSPECIFICATON WfS 9s CNTPRO.ECTND. Concept Plan 3 Lot- 060418 �„�1
Baa_LLN^ _ __ ___ NFORMATION)OFTHISPRODUCTISSTRIOTLYPROHIBrt WRHOUF PREPAREO BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONPNOTATIDRAWN BY SSTHRESERGOUMT.INC.'FE RESGWRITTENAUIHORI nW. USEWRHOUT AMA DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNOERTHERSM SAIDAUTHORVATBBNCONSTRUTESANILLEGRIMATEUSEANOSNALLTHEREBY IAWSOFTHESTATEOFMINNESOTA $ SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.�CHECREDBY —-- --- ----------------INDEMNIFY SATHNE-BERGOUIST. INC.D. OFALL RESPONSIBILRY. , LEHN/RUSSELL PROPERI I/2-- -------------------SATHREBERGOUIST,INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLDANY ILLEGMNATE1WSOUTHBROADWAY WAYZATqMN.X3B11Ya2)4]b0W0 ----USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSEG RESULTINGMINNESOTA CHARLIE LEHN
DATE _ __ ___ _______________FROM RL EGRMATE USE Nene. P.E.E4E4s e��
..,.m. Deb: Lk. Na. 2
H (o
w
Z)
LL
U_
� J
wa
U uJ
Q O
d' J
0
LL
U)
O
IL
O
IL
IF
`i ;
. %
-----------------------
------------
,
, ' •; ;,,;1,11,
+'1
,
------
it 11
it
Fit
8. % IP; ,`• ;11 :,.�; _
\� a
i ji
21
= LIW
Flit—
it
I / ```� � F•`:•
i
-fX— --
— 7J
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and City Council Memb
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: Joe Janish, Community Development irector
(a)
SUBJECT: Consider City Code amendments to Title 12 Chapter 6: Accessory Structures and
Temporary Structures and Ordinance Summary Publication - Planning
DATE: July 17, 2018
BACKGROUND
November 14, 2017 the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed potential modifications to
the City Code related to Accessory Structures and made a recommendation to the City Council.
November 21, 2017 the City Council tabled action on the proposed amendments and spent
several work sessions reviewing the proposal (1/23/18; 3/27/18; and 4/24/18).
During the City Council review staff was directed to clean up the ordinance language to make it
easier to read and comprehend, allow architectural features compatible to principal structures in
lieu of prohibiting steel exterior wall sheathing ("pole sheds"). Planning and Building staff
worked together and provided the attached draft ordinance to the City Council.
At the April 24, 2018 City Council work session staff was directed to bring the attached draft
ordinance through the adoption process for consideration. The Andover Planning and Zoning
Commission held a Public Hearing on June 12, 2018 in which no public comment was received
by the general public.
DISCUSSION
Due to the rewriting of the ordinance staff has provided a full "draft" version and the original vs.
a redlined copy of the ordinance.
Some highlights of draft ordinance:
• Rewritten for ease of understanding;
• "Shipping and Storage Containers" language added to Temporary structures;
• Architecturally compatible language is included;
• Language related to architectural standards for lots "less than 2.5 acres" vs. "less than 3
acres" has been modified, this change would allow for vertical steel siding on lots 2.5
acres or greater vs. the current 3 acres or greater.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION
The Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes from June 12, 2108 are attached for
review. The Planning and Zoning Commission made a positive recommendation to the City
Council. Discussion centered on questions related to the maximum building sizes for lots greater
than 5 acres and areas not zoned R-4. The Commission's positive recommendation also included
the reduction of 3 acres to 2.5 acres for allowing steel siding.
ACTION REQUIRED
Staff recommends the City Council consider the recommendation by the Planning and Zoning
Commission to approve the amendments to City Code Title 12, Accessory Structures, Uses and
Temporary Structures and Ordinance Summary for publication.
Resp lly S TI
Joe Janish
Community Development Director
Attachments Page
Current Ordinance 3
November 21, 2017 City Council Meeting Minutes Excerpt. 8
January 23, 2018 City Council Workshop Meeting Excerpt . .10
March 27, 2018 City Council Workshop Meeting Excerpt 13
April 24, 2018 City Council Workshop Meeting Excerpt .14
Proposed Draft Ordinance Amendments 15
June 12, 2018 Draft Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes .20
Ordinance XX Repealing and Reestablishing. .23
Ordinance XX Summary Publication. .28
Map "Lot Proportions By Acre" .29
3
concNrr
CHAPTER 6
ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND TEMPORARY STRUCTURES
SECTION:
12-6-1:
Definition
12-6-2:
Construction Prior To Principal Building
12-6-3:
Building Height
12-6-4:
Size And Construction Requirements
12-6-5:
Location And Setback Requirements
12-6-6:
Temporary Structures
12-6-1: DEFINITION: For the purpose of this chapter, "accessory building"
shall mean garages and sheds. (Ord. 8NNNNNN, 7-16-2002)
12-6-2: CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO PRINCIPAL BUILDING: No
accessory building or use shall be constructed or developed on a lot prior to the
time of construction of the principal building except by Conditional Use Permit.
(Ord. 8NNNNNN, 7-16-2002)
12-6-3: BUILDING HEIGHT:
A. Residential District: No accessory building in a residential area shall
exceed the height of the principal structure except subject to Subsection
12-3-5B2 of this title; and shall not exceed fifteen feet (15) in height in the
R-4 zoning district.
B. Business Or Industrial District: No accessory building in a commercial
or industrial district shall exceed the height of the principal building
except by conditional use permit. (Ord. 8NNNNNN, 7-16-2002)
12-6-4: SIZE AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS:
A. Accessory buildings on a residential parcel of five (5) acres or less shall
be as stated below. However, in the case where the accessory building
serves to satisfy the minimum garage requirements as specified in
Section 12-3-5 of this title, the garage will not be calculated in the
accessory building square footage requirement.
i
B. The accessory buildings on a residential parcel with a lot area of five
4
(5) acres or less, but more than one acre, shall not exceed the total eQig'QcAJT'
square footage of land covered by the foundation of the principal
structure.
C. The attached garage and detached accessory buildings on a residential
parcel in the R-4 zoning district or any property less than one acre shall
not exceed one thousand two hundred (1,200) square feet total, and in
,no case shall the detached accessory building be greater than fifty
percent (50%) of the total square footage of the foundation of the
principal structure. (amd. Ord. 314, 10-4-2005)
D. All principal structures constructed within the single-family urban
residential (R-4) district after the effective date hereof shall have an
attached garage with a minimum size of four hundred forty (440)
square feet.
E. All detached accessory buildings within the single-family urban
residential (R-4) zoning district shall have a minimum 4:12 roof pitch.
F. All detached accessory buildings shall be constructed to be similar in
design and exterior finish material so as to be compatible to the
principal structure, except as stated in Subsection G of this section.
G. Exterior Finishes: No permanent sheet metal, painted or unpainted
accessory building, except small garden sheds not .exceeding one
hundred twenty (120) square feet, shall be allowed on parcels of three (3)
acres or less in all residential districts and within the metropolitan urban
service area (MUSA) boundary. The foregoing shall not apply to painted
and finished metal siding normally used on residential structures. (Ord.
8NNNNNN, 7-16-2002)
12-6-5: LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS:
A: Private Garages Facing Public Ways: When a private garage is oriented
so as to face onto a public right-of-way, it shall not have less than the
minimum required setback for the principal structure as measured from
the lot line.
B. In Residential Districts:
Accessory buildings and structures located in residentially zoned
districts shall have a minimum setback of five feet (5') from side and
rear lot lines unless an easement exists that is more restrictive.
(Amended Ord. 314, 10-4-2005)
2. Accessory buildings and structures located in a yard adjacent to a
5
County road shall have a minimum setback fifty (50) feet from the
property line in all residential zoning districts except for the R-4 district,
where the setback shall be forty (40) feet. (Amended Ord. 314, 10-4-
05)
3. Accessory buildings and structures located in a yard adjacent to a City
street shall have a minimum setback forty (40) feet from the property
line in R-1 and R-2 zoning districts and thirty-five (35) feet in R-3 and
R-4 zoning districts. (Amended Ord. 314, 10-4-05)
4. Accessory structures located in the side or rear yard of corner lots that
are adjacent to a lot that fronts on a cul-de-sac shall be no closer to
the property line than the outside wall of the house. (Amended Ord.
325A, 4-18-06)
5. Where less than 120 feet of right-of-way exists for county roads or
arterial streets, setbacks for all structures shall be measured assuming
a sixty -foot right-of-way on each side of the existing right-of-way
centerline. (Amended Ord. 314, 10-4-05)
6. Where less than the minimum roadway right-of-way required by City
Code 11-3-3 exists, setbacks for all structures shall be measured
assuming right-of-way required by City Code 11-3-3. (Amended Ord.
3.14, 10-4-05)
C. In Business And Industrial Districts: Accessory buildings in the
business and industrial districts shall not be closer than ten feet
(10') from side and rear lot lines subject to provisions for the
abutting residential zone provided herein.
D. Location In Rear Yard Setback Areas Generally: An accessory building
may be.located within the rear yard setback, provided said accessory
building does not occupy more than twenty five percent (25%) of a
required rear yard.
E. Prohibited In Drainage And Utility Easements: All accessory buildings
and structures shall not be constructed or placed in a drainage or utility
easement.
F. Front Yard Setback Requirements: No detached garages or other
accessory buildings shall be located nearer the front lot line than the
principal structure except as follows:
1. On residential parcels with a lot area of one acre or more, a detached
garage or accessory building may be constructed closer to the front lot
line than the principal structure; however, the minimum distance it may
M
be from the front lot line is sixty feet (60') subject to City Code 12-6-5. cU Rc�r
(Amended Ord. 314, 10-4-2005)
2. All detached garages or accessory buildings constructed nearer the
front lot line than the principal structure shall be similar in design and
exterior finish material so as to be compatible.with the principal
structures. (Ord. 8NNNNNN, 7-16-2002)
G. Animals: Any building in which farm animals, pleasure/recreational
animals or poultry are kept shall be a distance of one hundred feet (100')
or more from any other occupied residence, and any open or roofed
enclosure in which such animals are kept shall be a distance of fifty feet
(50') or more from any occupied residential lot. The City Council may order
the owner of any such animals to apply fora Conditional Use Permit if it is
deemed to be in the interest of the public health, safety, or general
welfare. (Amended Ord. 8,10-21-1970; amd. 2003 Code; Amd Ord. 314
10-4-2005; Amd. 4/18/06, Ord. 325A)
12-6-6: TEMPORARY STRUCTURES: Temporary structures shall be.
required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit, as otherwise provided by this title.
The Conditional Use Permit for a temporary structure shall be reviewed subject
to the following regulations:
A. Temporary structures governed by this chapter shall be allowed by
Conditional Use Permit in all zoning districts.
B: There shall be a time limit established for temporary structures to remain
on a site as.a part of the Conditional Use Permit review during the
construction process. Temporary structures allowed by administrative
approval, other than construction trailers, shall be limited to six
(6) months in duration. The City Council may extend the six (6) month time
limit, if special circumstances exist.
C. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a site plan review must also be
approved.
D. Security measures such as lighting and including connections to the
main building shall be reviewed as a part of the Conditional Use Permit.
E. Parking shall be subject to the provisions of Section 12-14-10 of this title.
F. . Signage shall be subject to the provisions of Section 12-14-9 of this title.
G. The Conditional Use Permit will address the date the temporary
structure shall be removed from the property. The applicant will provide
a written long-term plan for its removal.
H. Temporary structures shall follow the required building setbacks. The aE�Jr,
temporary structure is to be located to the side or rear of the site and will
be reviewed as a part of the Conditional Use Permit.
All applicable requirements of the International Residential Code,
International Building Code, International Fire Code, and State Building
Code shall be met:
J. Provisions for water and sewer servicing a temporary structure shall be
subject to the review and approval of the building official.
K. Construction trailers shall be allowed administratively through the
commercial site plan review process through the construction process. No
trailers shall be allowed to be used as temporary sales offices.
L: Tents for promotional sales events shall be allowed up to ten (10)
calendar days per year. A permit must be approved for tents by the city
Fire Department to assure they will conform to the International Fire
Code. Fees for.tents shall be set as stated in Subsection 1-7-3A of this
code. No Conditional Use Permit is needed for this type of temporary
structure.
M. Upon sale or transfer of ownership of the property, the Conditional Use
Permit shall be brought up for renewal or the temporary structure shall
be removed. (Ord. 294, 7-6-2004)
H
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes —November 21, 2017
Page 3
Reconst ction (See Resolui
Item 5 Approve 2kl8 TimeSaver S
em 6 Approve L IT Liability C
Mo ' n by Goodrich, S conded by
R093-17)
tarial Service
approval of the C\nsent Agenda as
ANOKA UNTYSHE)IFF OFFICE MON LYREPORT
Commander B ' n Podany fromth
targets daycares i the area. He also
olving a recent in tigation surrou.
ci umstances. He al reported upc
of department.
Motion
i County Sh iff's Office highlig ted a scam whic\
ssed appreciate n for tips received om the public in
the death of a 1 ear -old in highly blicized .
,volunteering opp nities being done y members
Mayor ude thanked the S riffs Office and
promoted Police Chief of th City of Blaine.
Councilmemb Knight joined Ma or Trude in
Councilmember B I thanked the mm
cure of the communi
Coun Hmember Goodric tated he appreciat3ci
given Council and com unity. \
Commande odany thanked th Council for the
20 years.
Mr. Dickinson als wished Command Podany
Co mander Podany in oduced Lieutenan aul
Podany on
inki%Commander Pod%nt
`
for to "get downdirt"and take
the additional inNtmation the denarthgent has
to serve th6,community for
well.
Lenzmeier. L' utenant Lenzmeie esponded he
had' ig shoes to fill." has had a long c er with the Sherif Office and he is e ited for
this op rtunity.
Mayor Tru confirmed the Cit Council is lookin orward to workin with him.
CONSIDER CITY CODE AMENDMENTS — TITLE 12 ZONING REGULATIONS,
CHAPTER 6, ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND TEMPORARY STRUCTURES AND
ORDINANCE SUMMARYPUBLICATION
Mr. Janish presented information regarding City Code amendments addressing accessory
�/ structures and movable storage containers.
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes —November 21, 2017
Page 4
Mayor Trude asked if all of a resident's garages together could be bigger than their house with this
new proposal. Mr. Janish replied, "not necessarily." Mayor Trude then asked if the garage plus
all accessory buildings could be larger than the square footage of a home, to which Mr. Janish
replied, "potentially yes." He pointed out that 30% coverage of the lot size would still continue to
apply.
Mayor Trude asked if this would almost doubling what people can do now. Mr. Janish confirmed
that was true, however, the setbacks will still have to be met.
Mr. Janish reminded the Council that earlier in the year the City had a request for a variance and
the Council requested that staff look into it. Mr. Janish showed what surrounding cities have in
their Code on these matters.
On the topic of portable storage units, known as PODs, the City is trying to make it easier for
people moving to the community. The staff is proposing adding to the City Code that PODS can
remain for a 30 -day timeframe and for PODS to be parked on a lot. The POD has to be on a paved
surface, preserve sight -lines, and be limited to 30 days. According to the industry, they are
typically on site for 1-2 weeks. If it is longer than that, it is typically stored off site. Families still
have other options such as having a POD moved or renting a storage unit.
Mr. Janish reported the Planning and Zoning Commission voted in favor of the changes to the City
Code. Councilmember Holthus asked if this matter would be one or two motions. Mr. Janish
replied it could be one motion. Mr. Janish reminded the Council any new structure built has to be
in character with what has already been constructed in the neighborhood.
Councilmember Bukkila asked if the topic could be moved to a workshop meeting of the Council
Mayor Trude indicated she wanted to see different scenarios.
Councilmember Bukkila felt more information was needed to make a fair review.
Motion by Bukkila, Seconded by Holthus, to table the matter to an upcoming City Council
Workshop. Motion carried 4 ayes, 1 nay (Goodrich).
Mr. Janish will put some material together for the January City Council workshop meeting. Mayor
Trude asked Councilmembers to forward him any questions, so he could be prepared.
Mr. Dickinson encouraged concluding this by the end of February or March so residents can plan
their spring projects. Mayor suggested public comments could go to City Council or Staff.
MINISTRATO 'S REPORT
Cit taff updated the ouncil on the adm istration and city epartment activiti legislative
update updates on Bevel ment/CIP projects, nd meeting remin rs/community ev is.
10
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes—January 23, 2018
Page 3
Mayor Tru asked if Mr. Bau\theCi
felt the Ci ho
work on than slater. Mr. Bafelt if the11
under the laws o the new Statder their purvie
Statute. He felt it as better foto control their
I get somethi on the books an
have an ordin ce then the City is
as to what is app priate under the
destiny than to I ve it up to the
tut:. He agreed Qh Mr. Berkowitz \aftere
o place n w and he thought t re may be
ch ges coming. This ig push started bhe Super B wl coming into to and a lot of
the %or
iers ex ect to need me downtown d is now moving little
furtntown. thought thSuper Bowl is ne things will die own.il thought thi should d. Mr. Berkowitz tated they will dr upte and bring it rwardn 'I along with the s gested changes an
e consent agenda.
b. Accessory Structures/Portable Storage Units
Mr. Janish stated after two variances had been granted recently by the Council, staff was
provided direction on looking at increasing the square footage of allowable accessory
structures. After the approved variance requests, staff was under the understanding, it
was the City Council's desire to increase the square footage of allowed accessory
structures within the City of Andover.
Mr. Janish stated staff recommends the City Council review and discuss if increasing the
size of allowable accessory structures is appropriate, and if so should the size increase be
based on lot size, and zoning classifications.
Mayor Trude reviewed some of the history of this item with the Council. The Council
discussed an accessory structure going up in the City.
Mr. Dickinson stated if they have a significant number of variance requests that usually
triggers looking at a code amendment. Over the course of ten years there have been only
five variance requests related to accessory structures. Mr. Janish stated in 2011 there
were two variances related to height and setbacks and not related to the actual size of the
structure. Both of those variances were denied. He reviewed other variances throughout
the years.
The Council discussed if the ordinance should be changed since there have not been a lot
of variance requests.
Councilmember Goodrich leaned towards allowing people to do what they want to do
with their property. He is leaning towards changing this because it is private property
and he felt the owner should be able to do what they want on their property.
Councilmember Bukkila stated she understood what Councilmember Goodrich was
saying and felt the larger properties would have the room to do this but she felt the
11
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes — January 23, 2018
Page 4
smaller properties would not have the room. In terms of profile and how it looks, some
lots are the entire house and would not be able to have an accessory structure on it. She
did not know if this change would cure any issues that are out there.
Councilmember Bukkila stated she would like to have a review of their accessory
structures and the design they require. She has gotten complaints about why the
requirements are so strict and if there are alternatives to the building materials that could
make it cheaper for landowners particularly on larger lots. She thought if they were
going to open up accessory structures they could look at the materials requirements as
well.
Staff reviewed with the Council the different areas in the City where large accessory
structures are permitted.
Councilmember Bukkila wondered if what they were doing made sense or were they
being so restrictive that in order to afford anything they need to be on a high-end salary.
She wondered if someone has the land with a $200,000 split level home why are they
restricted.
Mr. Patch asked if the concern was with the exterior looks because he thought newer
materials that were not costly looked good. Councilmember Bukkila stated she did not
know if there was something that would satisfy their curb appeal concern but not be so
expensive.
Mr. Patch stated in terms of how the current ordinance works now the ordinance Andover
has right now works well. It seems that the Council's primary concern is should they
allow lots that are larger in all districts to have accessory structures. He thought that one
of the things that should be done is a rewrite of the structure ordinance. He stated they
need to straighten out the ordinance, so it makes sense and they can also look at what
those material standards should be. Mr. Dickinson stated in that instance they would
need to go by zoning district regulations because they would want different districts to
allow different materials. Councilmember Goodrich thought that sounded logical.
Councilmember Bukkila asked if the City is trying to dictate the footprint of the structure
and the type. Mayor Trude stated after the 2002 City bus tour there was a feeling of
proportionality. There should be proportionality within a development. Councilmember
Bukkila agreed but thought they already differed by the lot size requirements. She stated
over the years the houses have gotten bigger on the same size lots and the scale is
different than what it was years ago. She wondered if it mattered what the building is as
long it does not exceed the twelve hundred requirement.
Councilmember Knight stated everyone has their own perspective on what looks nice.
Councilmember Goodrich asked who gets to decide what looks good. He thought it
should be up to the landowner to decide that to a certain extent. Mayor Trude thought
12
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes —danuary 23, 2018
Page 5
this started because of a perceived problem. She did not think they wanted to spend more
time on this until staff can bring forward more information.
The majority of the City Council did not see a problem with the ordinance and did not
think the ordinance should be rewritten.
Mayor Trude thought the architectural design part of the ordinance can be reviewed for
possible changes. She did not hear support for changing the sizes within the districts in
the City.
Mr. Patch thought the ordinance needed reorganization but keep the same standards and
look at some alternative materials that could be used. Mr. Dickinson stated this would be
brought back in February for further review.
C. Ultimate
Mr. Janish statX Tony Denucci wNh the American WNstling Federation WF)
approached city N#ff and expressed i terest in setting upXan event within th City of
dover either at a institution/public commercial ven Due to the
cu
rr t Ultimate
F hting Ordinance p hibiting "Ultimat Fighting" regardl s of how named o
des ibed and defines ` ltimate Fighting" any form of ente inment, where th
prima practice involves 'ndividuals engage in physical conta by striking an op nem
with ha s, feet or body, th event cannot occu within the City o dover.
Mr. Janish s ted staff recomm ds the City CouncX discuss the possi 'lity of allowing
this type of e t to occur and if kired, staff will m ve forward with aotential code
amendment thro h the regular co adoption process.
No-
anish stated if ere is interest by t Council then st will need to go ba and try
termine what mo 'fications need to b made and how th can distinguish b tween
Mayor T de stated they all Veed that they di of want Ultimate fighting in
so she won ered if the Counci wanted to see a re ite done for this ilvm.
Councilmembnight stated he ' not. Councilme ber
can be used ase -3 ndraiser. She did of want to say no 1
'd want to say no ultimate fighting. ayor Trude indi
to ee this in AndoveN Councilmember ukkila stated she
wha would happen in e ring, she is more oncerned with
the n in¢ lot.
Holthus state he might, if it
irofessional wre ing, but she
ted she is not sure he wanted
not have a problwith
wh t was going to hap en in
City Atto ey Baumgartner a ed how this can b written into an or ance to make
sense that p fessional wrestlin is ok but ultimate ghting is not. He ated this will
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes — March 27, 2018
Page 4
The P\aning Zoning
Co fission left them ting.
The City Co cil reconvenedat :10 P.M.
CODE AMENDMENT DISC USSIONIACCESSOR Y STR UCT URES
Mr. Janish explained after two variances had been granted recently by the Council, staff was
provided direction on looking at increasing the square footage of allowable accessory structures.
Mr. Janish reviewed the Accessory Structures Code Amendment with the Council.
Mr. Patch stated when he tries to prepare an ordinance he tries to whittle it down to what needs to
be said.
Mr. Patch reviewed different types of accessory structures with the Council. The Council agreed
they like structures with nicer fagades that complement the homes.
Mayor Trude thought the current variance process works well. Councilmember Holthus agreed.
Mr. Janish showed some out building photos and the Council discussed which ones would be
appropriate.
Councilmember Knight asked if there was a way to require some type of landscaping plan for the
accessory structures.
CI CAMPUS MAS R PLAN
Mr. Be owitz reviewed the agade
Majority of ouncil liked the bl to
Mr. Dickinson r iewed the Connor
estimated space ne s based on stale
D CUSS 2019 BUD TDEVEL
Mr. Di inson indicated th uideli:
them fort to the Council for rov
2018BUDG PROGRESS RE
Mr. Dickinson stat d all budgets are
of the public ork,
ey
grcolor forth
Maty Center Master
eh der input.
facility
:wpublic works i
'1kn, indicating the
GUIDELINES
s are muc the same as those
on April 3` .
no surprises:
for 2018. He NI bring
13
14
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes—April 24, 2018
Page 4
Mayor rude stated they st I have time to revi w this for adding i to their budget for ext year.
RECESS D RECONVEN
The Council re ssed at 7:08 P.M. d reconvened at . 5 p.m.
CITY CODE AMENDMENT DISCUSSION
Mr. Janish explained after two variances were recently granted by the Council, staff was provided
direction to look at increasing the square footage of allowable accessory structures.
Mr. Janish reviewed the staff report with the City Council.
Mr. Patch noted there are currently three conditions that need to be met in order to construct a pole
structure on a property. Mayor Trude wondered if it should only be allowed in certain zoning
districts.
Councilmember Goodrich thought there was also discussion about architectural design of the
building. Mr. Patch reviewed the new wording with the Council. He stated there is some concern
with who reviews the plans and the subjectivity of the design. Mayor Trude stated they currently
have that issue. Mr. Patch stated that is correct and staff needed to determine a standard.
The Council reviewed the amendment wording with staff.
Councilmember Bukkila agreed to lowering the restrictions to 2.5 acres from 3 acres because she
did not think it would have an impact on the neighborhood. Councilmember Goodrich agreed.
Council agreed the new design standards proposed should go through the approval process.
Mr. Patch noted height was also brought up and Council never wanted to change the height and
the new wording changes it, so he will clean that up and go back to the original wording.
Mayor Trude stated they never discussed the shipping and storage container in the driveway and
wondered if this should be shortened from thirty days to two weeks. Councilmember Bukkila had
mixed feelings about this because some large projects may take longer than two weeks. How
would they accommodate a resident through a remodel without residents abusing it.
Councilmember Goodrich thought two weeks might be a little short.
Councilmember Bukkila thought the temporary storage code proposed reads better than the old
wording.
RURAL PLED
UNIT DE OPMENT (PUD) ISCUSSION
Mr. Janish exp la1 ed the City Cuno'1 recently review two rural \PUDequests. Both
15
CHAPTER
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, USES AND TEMPORARY STRUCTURES
SECTION:
12-6-1:
Definition
12-6-2:
Construction Prior To Principal Structure
12-6-3:
Accessory Structure Height
12-6-4:
Size And Construction Requirements
12-6-5:
Location And Setback Requirements
12-6-6:
Temporary Structures
12-6-1: DEFINITIONS:
A. Accessory Structure: For the purpose of -ti
mean garages, sheds, utility buildings and`
to principal structures and uses.
B. Building Height: For the purposes of this s
vertical distance from the average of grade
adjoining the exterior of the building) to the
surface.
12-6-2: CONSTRUCTION PRIG
structure shall be permitted on any lot
Use Permit.
12-6-3:
structure" shall
uses accessory
ing height-- hall mean the
'age finished ground level
height of the highest roof
STRUCTURE: No accessory
aI structure except by Conditional
The maximum building height of
A. Residential Districts; Except as provided by Section 12-3-5 of this Title, no
residential accessory structure shall exceed the building height of the principal
structure, and in the R=4 zoning district the maximum accessory structure building
height shall not exceed fifteen (1'5) feet.
B. Business or Industrial Districts: Maximum accessory structure height in a
commercial or industrial district shall be equal to the building height of the principal
structure, except by conditional use permit or except subject to Section 12-3-5.
12-6-4: SIZE AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS:
A. Residential Districts:
Accessory Structure Area: If an accessory structure or portion thereof serves to
satisfy the minimum garage size requirements of Section 12-3-5, then that area,
whether attached or detached, will not be deducted from the maximum allowable
area of accessory structures. The maximum allowable area of residential
accessory structures must not exceed the area specified below:
W.
a. Lots In The R-4 District and Lots Less Than 1 Acre — In the R-4 District and in
all other residential districts, on lots of less than one (1) acre the maximum
allowable area of accessory structures shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of
the principal structure foundation area (excluding attached garage); and the total
combined area of attached garage and accessory structures shall not exceed
one thousand two hundred (1,200) square feet, whichever is less.
b. Lots 1 Acre To Less Than 5 Acres -- In residential districts other than the R-4
district, on lots of at least one (1) acre but less than five (5) acres, the maximum
allowable area of accessory structures shall not exceed the principal structure
foundation area (excluding attached garage).
c. Lots 5 Acres And Larger -- In residential districts other than the R-4 district, on
lots of five (5) acres and larger, the maximum allowable area of accessory
structures shall be limited only by the setbacks and maximum impervious land
coverage requirements of this code.
B. All Districts: Accessory structures shall not occupy more than twenty five percent
(25%) of any required rear yard
C. Construction Requirements:
1. To preserve residential neig
structures located:
• closer than the principal
way; or
• within the_Metronolitan l
• on any lot of less
shall be located and d
and property values, accessory
fronting on a public right of
undary]; or,
to be architecturally compatible with the principal
iral compatibility shall be accomplished by integrating the exterior design
and finishes of the principal structure, use and neighborhood into the
I accessory. structure. Architectural features may include:
• roof pitch (minimgm;4:12 required), soffits, gables, dormers,
• fenestration (placement of windows/doors);
• exterior finish cold rs'and textures consistent with or complementary to the
principal structure,
• decorative exterior finishes, siding, wainscot and veneers (brick, stone,
stucco, EFIS, etc.),
• decorative lighting, and
• landscaping.
2. Except as allowed by Section 12-6-5 C for Farm Animals/Livestock, exterior roof
and wall finishes of galvanized or unfinished metal panels are not allowed on
residential accessory structures.
3. Where a determination of architectural compatibility cannot be made by the
Building Official or Zoning Administrator, the determination must be made in
17
accordance with Title 9, Section 9-1-4.
12-6-5: LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS:
A. Setbacks:
1. Front Yard Setbacks:
a. In all districts accessory structures shall not be located nearer the front lot line
than the principal structure; except on residential lots with a lot area of one (1)
acre or more, the minimum front yard setback is sixty feet (60').
b. In all districts, front yard setbacks for
principal structures (See Section 12
i. Accessory structures located on
cul-de-sac, shall be setback at l
adjacent cul-de-sac lot.
ii. Where less than the minimum riga
11-3-3 exists, accessory structure
the right-of-way width required by
iii. Accessory structures I,
a minimum setback of
structures are the same as for
as specified below:
)rner lot adjacent to a lot that fronts on a
as far as the principal structure on the
)f -way required by City Code Section
:tba'cks shall be measured assuming
:v Code 11-3-3.
ijacent to a county road shall have
the property line; except in the R-4
I be forty `(40) feet.
iv. For lots abutting county roads or arterial streets, where less than 120 feet of
right-of-way exists," the setback for accessory structures shall be measured
assuming a sixty4bot (60') right-of-way on each side of the existing right-of-
wav centerline.
2. Side Yard and
a. Residential Districts!: In all residential districts, accessory structures shall be
setback at least five (5) feet from side and rear lot lines.
b. Business and Industrial Districts: In business and industrial districts,
accessory structures shall be setback at least ten feet (10') from side and rear
lot lines, subject to provisions for the abutting residential zone provided herein.
B. Drainage and Utility Easements: Accessory structures and structures shall not be
constructed or placed in a drainage or utility easement.
C. Farm Animals/Live Stock: No enclosed accessory structure (barn or shed) in which
farm animals, pleasure/recreational animals or poultry are kept may be located within
one hundred (100) feet of a residential dwelling. No stationary or moveable open
animal shelter may be located within fifty (50) feet of an adjacent residential lot unless
the owner of the adjacent lot is the same party. The City Council may order the owner
of any farm animals to apply for and obtain a Conditional Use Permit if it is deemed to
be in the interest of the public health, safety, or general welfare.
12-6-6: TEMPORARY STRUCTURES: Temporary structures shall be allowed by
either administrative approval or by Conditional Use Permit as otherwise provided by this
title.
A. Administrative Approval: Temporary structures allowed by administrative review and
approval by the city administrator include construction trailers, shipping and storage
containers and tents. Temporary structures allowed by administrative approval,
other than construction trailers, shall be limited to six (6) months in duration. The
City Council may extend the six (6) month time limit, if special circumstances exist.
L-3
Construction Trailers -- Construction trailers shall'be allowed administratively
through the commercial site plan review process and building permits. No
trailers shall be allowed to be used as temoorawsales offices.
2. Tents -- Tents for private parties and promotional sales events shall be allowed
up to ten (10) calendar days per year. A tent permit must be applied for by the
property owner or their agent. The Fire Department will review and approve or
deny the application based on conformance with the Minnesota. State Fire
Code.
Shipping and Storage Containers -- In all zoning districts, moveable shipping
and storage containers shall only be allowed subject to the following limitations:
a lot for more than
thirty (3.0) continuous days.
ii. In no case may a moveable container be used as a permanent or temporary
or
be placed at least fifteen (15) feet back of curb or
only within the allowed driveway and shall not interfere with
sight
4. Permits And Fees -=- No permit fees are required for construction trailers.
Permit fees for tents shall be set as stated in Subsection 1-7-3A of this code.
Conditional Use Permit: Temporary structures allowed by Conditional Use Permit
shall be reviewed subject to the following regulations:
1. There shall be a time limit established for temporary structures to remain on a
site as a part of the Conditional Use Permit review during the construction
process.
2. Prior to issuance of a temporary structure permit, a site plan review must also be
approved.
3. Security measures such as lighting and including connections to the main
structure shall be reviewed as a part of the Conditional Use Permit.
M
19
4. Parking shall be subject to the provisions of Section 12-14-10 of this title.
5. Signage shall be subject to the provisions of Section 12-14-9 of this title.
6. The Conditional Use Permit will address the date the temporary structure shall be
removed from the property. The applicant will provide a written long-term plan for
its removal.
7. Temporary structures shall follow the required structure setbacks. The temporary
structure is to be located to the side or rear of the site and will be reviewed as a
part of the Conditional Use Permit.
8. All applicable requirements of and the Min
Minnesota State Fire Code shall be met.
9. Provisions for water and sewer servicing a terr
the review and approval of the building official.
Building Code and
shall be subject to
10. Upon sale or transfer of ownership of the property, the Conditional Use Permit
shall be brought up for renewal or the temporary structure shall be removed.
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes —June 12, 2018
Page 12
consideration, o she will chat
the application a the Planning
\(Huon),
ed on a 5 -ayes
present eth), Hanson state
meeting.
g\ent
in order move it to City ouncil to resolve
is only a 'sory.
�oehler, Loehle' ,Sims, Vander ), 1 -nay
0e.
s item would 13\ before the CounXil at the July 17, $018,
PUBLIC HEARING: To consider City Code Amendments to Title 12, Accessory
Structures.
Community Development Director Janish noted the purpose of; this item is to hold a
public hearing and take input on a potential modification to the City Code related to
accessory structures (portable items) and sizes and make a recommendation to the City
Council. He noted the Planning Commissionconsidered this amendmertt_,in late 2017,
and made a recommendation to the City Council. On November 14, 2017, the City
Council tabled action and reviewed the proposal at several Work Sessions. I`During that
review by City Council, staff was directed to clean up the, ordinance language to make it
easier to read, comprehend and allow architectural features compatible to principal
structures in lieu of prohibiting steel exterior wall sheathing ,(i.e., pole sheds). Staff
worked together tprevi$e the draft ordinance, which was considered at the April 24,
2018, City Council Work Session. At that meeting, staff Was directed to bring the draft
ordinance throueh the. adontion nrncese
Community DevelopmbnfDirector Janish reviewed highlights of the revised ordinance
that was rewritten for ease of understanding; `shipping and storage containers' language
was added to Temporary structures; architecturally compatible language is included; and,
language related to architectural, standards for lots `less than 2.5 acres' vs. `less than 3
acres' has been modified. This change will allow for vertical steel siding on lots 2.5
acres or greatex vs. the current 3 acres or greater. He referenced the map included in the
meeting packet,' noting it identifies the location where steel buildings could be built
should the lot size be changed to 2.5 acres.
Community Developfnent Director Janish noted staff has provided a full draft version and
the original version of- the ordinance instead of a redline copy. He stated staff
recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission conduct a Public Hearing to review
and discuss the proposed ordinance and consider a recommendation to the City Council.
Chairperson Nemeth asked whether the Commissioners had questions of staff.
Commissioner Sims asked if he needed to recuse himself since he owns a 2.5 -acre lot.
Community Development Director Janish stated he would not need to but if he felt
conflicted, he could certainly abstain. Commissioner Koehler stated since Commissioner
20
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes —June 12, 2018
Page 13
Sims raised the issue, he would recommend Commissioner Sims abstain from this
discussion.
Commissioner Sims stated he would recuse himself from this discussion and vote.
Motion by Koehler, seconded by Hudson, to open the public hearing at 8:37 p.m. Motion
carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays; 1 -present (Sims), 0 -absent vote.
There was no public input.
Motion by Hudson, seconded by Daninger, to
Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1 -present (Sv
Chairperson Nemeth stated he has a questior
residential districts other than R-4, noting
allowable area of accessory structures shall`
impervious land coverage requirements of
Director Janish replied that reflects the curren
Chairperson Nemeth noted if
10,000 square foot building.
potentially 20,000 Square foc
section because h older ve
typically when individuals on
shed, building department sta
theaverage resident is not lobi
the potential of Some tune 6f b
Nemeth noted if
.............
steel
hearing at 8:37 p.m.
t lots that are five; acres and larger in
language indicates,_; `The maximum
ited only by the setbacks, maximum
it is today.
body hada 2,500 square foot house they could build a
immunity Development Director Janish stated or a
Iding. He stated staff did add some clarity to this
did not provide the limitations. He explained that
acres dome for -ward and ask for a 10,000 square foot
et with them to determine what is occurring there as
.or a 10,000 square foot accessory structure unless for
is anything over 2.5 acres, you can construct a
Lent Director Janish confirmed that is correct.
Commissioner VanderLaan, asked about building height if solar panels are added.
Community Development Director Janish explained that as the ordinance is written, he
would interpret that solar panels would not count into the height as it measures from the
average ground level to half the height of the highest distance.
Commissioner Koehler stated he remembers a workshop many years ago on solar panels
and there were separate restrictions on how far they could be off the roof surface as well
as the angle of the panels so it may be regulated by a separate ordinance. City Planner
Hanson stated that is correct.
Chairperson Nemeth raised the scenario of a house and garage with an addition onto the
garage for two cars, one with a commercial height door. He asked which one is used to
measure height. Community Development Director Janish stated it would be measured
from the highest peak and the maximum height depends on the zoning district.
21
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes—June 12, 2018
Page 14
Commissioner Koehler asked if he knows of a property that meets that description.
Chairperson Nemeth stated his neighbor's property is similar to what he described.
Commissioner VanderLaan stated she thinks this ordinance is needed and a compliment
is in order for Commissioner Koehler as she recalls a discussion when a young man
wanted a large building holding nine or ten cars, was going to stack cars with a lift, and
wanted to fix cars. She recalled that Commissioner Koehlerhad tactfully said you cannot
fix cars there for money, you have to do it free of charg0 and as a result that request has
not resurfaced. She stated this is not talking about buildings to fix cars or the use but
construction of structures. Community Development Director Janish stated that is
correct, it relates to the appearance of the building.
Motion by Daninger, seconded by Hudson, to'recommend to the City Council approval
of Code amendments to Title 12, Accessory Structures. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 1 -
nay (Nemeth), 1 -present (Sims), 0 -absent vote.
BUSINESS.
City Plann\r Hanson providN an update on pl ug cases forwa ed to the City
and uncomi aeenda items. \
4DJOURNMENT.
Carla Wirt% Recording
TimeSaver OffSiteSeci,
22
23
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. XX SUMMARY
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ANDOVER CITY CODE TITLE 12 CHAPTER 6 ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
AND TEMPORARY STRUCTURES AND REPLACED WITH:
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, USES
SECTION:
12-6-1:
12-6-2:
12-6-3:
12-6-4:
12-6-5:
12-6-6:
Construction Prior To
Accessory Structure
Size And Construct s
Location And SetbacR
Temporary Structures
12-6-1: DEI
A. Accessory
mean gar
to pfrincTpo
z+
B. 1224 'in H
ver ical is
a 1-5ing t
surface:,
,r
12-6-2: COI
structure shall be
Use Permit.
STRUCTURES
"accessory structure" shall
and similar uses accessory
ofiIMsection, building height shall mean the
of grade (the average finished ground level
g) to the average height of the highest roof
1OR TO PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE: No accessory
lot prior to the principal structure except by Conditional
12-6-3: ACCESSORY STRUCTURE HEIGHT: The maximum building height of
accessory structures shall be limited as follows:
A. Residential Districts: Except as provided by Section 12-3-5 of this Title, no
residential accessory structure shall exceed the building height of the principal
structure, and in the R-4 zoning district the maximum accessory structure building
height shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet.
B. Business or Industrial Districts: Maximum accessory structure height in a
commercial or industrial district shall be equal to the building height of the principal
24
structure, except by conditional use permit or except subject to Section 12-3-5.
12-6-4: SIZE AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS:
A. Residential Districts:
1. Accessory Structure Area: If an accessory structure or portion thereof serves to
satisfy the minimum garage size requirements of Section 12-3-5, then that area,
whether attached or detached, will not be deducted from the maximum allowable
area of accessory structures. The maximum allowable area of residential
accessory structures must not exceed the area specified below:
a. Lots In The R-4 District and Lots Less Than E1kE
all other residential districts, on lots of less than
allowable area of accessory structures sfidll!%no
the principal structure foundation ar ezcludin
combined area of attached garag = . access(
one thousand two hundred (1,2 quare feet,
b. Lots 1 Acre To Less Than 5 Acres --1.
district, on lots of at leVtne (1) acre
allowable area of acce" r"ucture;
foundation area (excludiA iffi ed.aar
— In the R-4 District and in
(1) acre the maximum
;eed fifty percent (50%) of
ached garage); and the total
t`rubtures shall not exceed
ch6V.dr s less.
I districts dffler„than the R-4
§.
ian five (5) acr•es�;(the maximum
exceed the principal structure
c. Lots 5 Acres d Larger -- Ihfftsideritial d�sxnets r than the R-4 district, on
lots of five, 5 rt
� d c nd large i he a itnia(it Ilow le area of accessory
structurer=rall be limited only by�tii� setbacks and maximum impervious land
coverage n 'Cremenf ;of this co' 'SAW
'
sae ;.y t s o
B. All Dista s ' cce = �tiet;halj°11t occupy more than twenty five percent
C. Cons (tioen Require is
1. o �_rve res idenLaJbn
ei9 I�e.ood aesthetics and property values, accessory
• closertn the prlian
�al structure to a property line fronting on a public right of
way, or
• w(thm the Iv)a''t = Urban Service Area [MUSA Boundary]; or,
• on any lot Aw” than two and a half (2.5) acres,
shall be located and designed to be architecturally compatible with the principal
structure, use and neighborhood.
Architectural compatibility shall be accomplished by integrating the exterior design
elements and finishes of the principal structure, use and neighborhood into the
residential accessory structure. Architectural features may include:
• roof pitch (minimum 4:12 required), soffits, gables, dormers,
• fenestration (placement of windows/doors);
• exterior finish colors and textures consistent with or complementary to the
25
principal structure;
• decorative exterior finishes, siding, wainscot and veneers (brick, stone,
stucco, EFIS, etc.),
• decorative lighting, and
• landscaping.
2. Except as allowed by Section 12-6-5 C for Farm Animals/Livestock, exterior roof
and wall finishes of galvanized or unfinished metal panels are not allowed on
residential accessory structures.
t�'
12-6-5:
Where a determination of architectural compatib
Building Official or Zoning Administrator, the deft
accordance with Title 9, Section 9-1-4.
A. Setbacks:
LOCATION AND SETBACK REQU
1. Front Yard Setbacks:
In all districts acc
than the principal
acre or more, the
cannot be made by the
dation must be made in
)cated nearerTV front lot line
I lots with a lot area of one (1)
.sixty feet (60').
are the same as for
ad below:
corner lot adjacent to a lot that fronts on a
Lt as far as the principal structure on the
Tfit-of-way required by City Code Section
,ire setbacks shall be measured assuming
by City Code 11-3-3.
-es located in a yard adjacent to a county road shall have
k of fifty (50) feet from the property line; except in the R-4
minimum setback shall be forty (40) feet.
iv. For lots abutting county roads or arterial streets, where less than 120 feet of
right-of-way exists, the setback for accessory structures shall be measured
assuming a sixty -foot (60') right-of-way on each side of the existing right-of-
way centerline.
2. Side Yard and Rear Yard Setbacks
a. Residential Districts: In all residential districts, accessory structures shall be
setback at least five (5) feet from side and rear lot lines.
b. Business and Industrial Districts: In business and industrial districts,
T.
accessory structures shall be setback at least ten feet (10') from side and rear
lot lines, subject to provisions for the abutting residential zone provided herein.
B. Drainage and Utility Easements: Accessory structures and structures shall not be
constructed or placed in a drainage or utility easement.
C. Farm Animals/Live Stock: No enclosed accessory structure (barn or shed) in which
farm animals, pleasure/recreational animals or poultry are kept may be located within
one hundred (100) feet of a residential dwelling. No stationary or moveable open
animal shelter may be located within fifty (50) feet of an adjacent residential lot unless
the owner of the adjacent lot is the same party. The City Council may order the owner
of any farm animals to apply for and obtain a Conditio se Permit if it is deemed to
be in the interest of the public health, safety, or ge elfare.
12-6-6: TEMPORARY STRUCTURES:
either administrative approval or by Cond
title.
A. Administrative Approval: Temporary s f, re:
approval by the city administrator include`ft,si
containers and tents. Temp. structural' .s
other than construction traile 11 be limited'
City Council may extend the s h time
1. Construction
through th
trailers s
2. Tents -- Tent:
10)
ert
eny the ap -1
de.
3. ShipjMand
ands foraae c
res shall be allowed by
ierwise provided by this
by ad'
trative review and
ailers, sh p ' g and storage
(6) months in duration. The
f special circumstances exist.
S -- Cons ction shall {fie allowed administratively
I site p rev' s - an"d"building permits. No
alto to be u mpor ales offices.
rties ane romotional sales events shall be allowed
ea tent permit must be applied for by the
nt. it epartment will review and approve or
on con < • ante with the Minnesota State Fire
:ontaifiers -- In all zoning districts, moveable shipping
shall only be allowed subject to the following limitations:
i. Containers. . "Fir without contents, must not be on a lot for more than
thirty (30) 0 5,Mp� mous days.
ii. In no case may a moveable container be used as a permanent or temporary
structure or accessory structure.
iii. Containers must be placed at least fifteen (15) feet back of curb or
pavement edge, only within the allowed driveway and shall not interfere with
traffic sight lines.
4. Permits And Fees --- No permit fees are required for construction trailers.
Permit fees for tents shall be set as stated in Subsection 1-7-3A of this code.
27
B. Conditional Use Permit: Temporary structures allowed by Conditional Use Permit
shall be reviewed subject to the following regulations:
1. There shall be a time limit established for temporary structures to remain on a
site as a part of the Conditional Use Permit review during the construction
process.
2. Prior to issuance of a temporary structure permit, a site plan review must also be
approved.
3. Security measures such as lighting and including connections to the main
structure shall be reviewed as a part of the Conditional Use Permit.
4. Parking shall be subject to the provisions
5. Signage shall be subject to the
6. The Conditional Use Permit will
removed from the property. The
its removal.
7
E
Temporary structures shall
structure is to be located tc�
part of the Conditional Use
9. Provisions for
1
All other Titles
adopted by the
Adopted by the City
2018.
ATTEST:
12-14-10 of this title.
14-9 of this title.
structure shall be
>ng -term plan for
re setbacks. The temporary
and will be reviewed as a
uilding Code and
a temporary structure shall be subject to
hip 6f4the property, the Conditional Use Permit
or the temporary structure shall be removed.
the City Code shall remain as written and
City of Andover this
day of
CITY OF ANDOVER
Michelle Hartner, City Clerk Julie Trude, Mayor
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. XX SUMMARY
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ANDOVER CITY CODE TITLE 12 CHAPTER 6 ACCESSORY
BUILDINGS AND TEMPORARY STRUCTURES AND REPLACED WITH TITLE 12
CHAPTER 6 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, USES AND TEMPORARY STRUCTURES
STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION AND POLICY
Statutory Authorization
This ordinance amendment is adopted pursuant to the authorization and policies contained in Minnesota
Statute 412.
Policy
The purpose of these regulations is to protect the public health, safety and welfare. The Repeal and
Replacement of this section was done to allow for a rewrite for ease of understanding, included "shipping
and Storage Containers" language, defined "architecturally compatible" and Language related to
architectural standards for lots "less than 2.5 acres" vs. "less than 3 acres" has been modified, this
change would allow for vertical steel siding on lots 2.5 acers or greater vs. the current 3 acres or
greater.
GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS
Jurisdiction
The provisions of this ordinance shall apply to the City of Andover.
Enforcement
The City Administrator or his/her designee shall have the authority to enforce the provisions of this
ordinance.
Interpretation
Interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance shall be held to be the minimum requirements and shall be
liberally construed in the favor of the governing body.
A printed copy of this ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular hours of the City
Clerk.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 17th day of July, 2017.
ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER
Michelle Harmer, Deputy City Clerk
Julie Trude, Mayor
W?
DOVE.••a •a-
�L=
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOY
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
David Berkowitz, Director of Public Wo ity Engineer
FROM: Jason Law, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Consider Award Bid/17-17, Crosstown Boulevard NW Trail (Bunker Lake
Boulevard NW to 1401h Ave. NW) & 18-26, Fire Station #1 Parking Lot
Reconstruction - Engineering
DATE: July 17, 2018
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is requested to accept bids and consider award of the bid for Projects 17-17, Crosstown
Boulevard NW Trail (Round Lake Boulevard NW to 140'h Ave. NW) and 18-26, Fire Station #1 Parking
Lot Reconstruction.
DISCUSSION
The Crosstown Boulevard NW Trail will extend from Bunker Lake Boulevard NW to 140`" Avenue NW.
A boardwalk will be constructed across the wetland north of Bunker Lake Boulevard NW but will be bid
as a separate project later this summer.
The Fire Station #I Parking Lot Reconstruction will include removal and replacement of deteriorated
concrete curb and gutter segments, replacement of the existing bituminous parking lot, expansion of
concrete pads into the Fire Station used for parking trucks and training, fixing issues with the sidewalks
and pedestrian curb ramps leading into the building, and pond construction for stormwater cleaning.
These projects are identified in the City's 2018-2022 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for 2018. The trail
improvements are the Base Bid. Fire Station #1 Parking Lot Reconstruction was bid as Alternate 1.
The bid opening was held on Friday, July 13, 2018. Due to the current bidding climate, bids received
were above the Engineer's Estimate. Please refer to the attached bid tabulation for a breakdown of bids
and unit prices. The three lowest bids received are as follows:
Contractor
Total Bid
C.P. 17-17
Base Bid
C.P. 18-26
Alt. 1 Bid
North Valley, Inc.
$380,453.51
$203,338.57
$177,114.94
ASTECH, Inc.
$474,155.15
$268,183.40
$205,971.75
Barber Construction, Inc.
$551,440.00
$304,000.00
$247,440.00
Engineer's Estimate
$326,659.00
$169,295.00
$157,364.00**
2018 CIP Budget
$587,000.00*
$110,000.00
*Included Boardwalk (to be bid later this summer)
"Additional concrete slabs and parking expansion were requested and a pond is
required per CCWD requirements which have increased the costs.
BUDGETIMPACT
Project 17-17 is to be funded through the City Trail Fund. Project 17-17 is anticipated to have a final
project cost of $660,000 due to the current bid climate, easement acquisitions and the anticipated future
boardwalk costs. Project 18-26 is to be funded through the City Capital Equipment Reserve Fund.
Administration / Finance is currently evaluating available funding sources for the cost overrun.
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to consider approval of the resolution accepting bids and awarding the
contract to North Valley, Inc. in the amount of $ 380,453.51 (base and alternate) for Projects 17-17,
Crosstown Boulevard NW Trail (Round Lake Boulevard NW to 140`h Ave. NW) and 18-26, Fire Station
#1 Parking Lot Reconstruction.
Administration will discuss with the City Council additional funding sources for the shortfalls at the July
171h Budget Workshop meeting.
R ectfull sub fitted,
Jason J. Law. P.E.
Attachments: Resolution & Bid Tabulation
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Council member
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE BASE
BID AND ALTERNATE BID FOR IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 17-17,
CROSSTOWN BLVD. NW TRAIL & 18-26 FIRE STATION #1 PARKING LOT
RECONSTRUCTION .
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in Council Resolution
No. 041-18 dated June 19 , 2018, bids were received, opened and tabulated
according to law with results of the three lowest bidders as follows:
Contractor
Total Bid
C.P. 17-17
Base Bid
C.P. 18-26
Alt. 1 Bid
North Valley, Inc.
$380,453.51
$203,338.57
$177,114.94
ASTECH, Inc.
$474,155.15
$268,183.40
$205,971.75
Barber Construction, Inc.
$551,440.00
$304,000.00
$247,440.00
Engineer's Estimate
$326,659.00
$169,295.00
$157,364.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to
hereby accept the bids as shown (Base Bid and Alternate Bid) and to indicate North
Valley, Inc. as being the apparent low bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk to
enter into a contract with North Valley. Inc. in the amount of $ 380,453.51
for construction of the improvements; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders
the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and
the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until the contract has been executed and
bond requirements met.
MOTION seconded by Council member
and adopted by the City
Council at a regular meeting this 17th day of July 2018 , with Council
members voting in favor
of the resolution, and Council members
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Julie Trude - Mayor
Michelle Hartner — Deputy City Clerk
voting
Cmsato er Boulavard Trall (C.P. 17-1)) and Fire Station 01 Parking Lot Reconstr9otlen (CD. Ilii
Bid Tabulation: Bids opened July 13, 2013: 9:00 am
CROSSTOWN
BLVD TRAIL 17-17)
TOTAL ESTIMATED
I Al[SiMAT ED
Nonh Valley, Inc.
ASTECH
Barber Conslr-ncn, Inc.
(C.P.
PROJEC-
-_ A',TITIES
-
NOTES
ITOMNO. CRIP.TION-TION-.
NR
U_
EST. -.UNIT
-
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT _
- -_:^'
UNIT
I
NOTES
ITEM NO. DEBCRPTION... ..
_DES
QUAN:.
,PRICE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT. __:"
AMOUNT
..PRICE
.AMOUNT
PRICE I
PRICE
AMOUNT
2
1
2021501 MoIchuto0 TrelIPmad
LS
1 S 401000 S
400000
1268929 S 1268929
$25.00SM S 250000042M.00
$
7coo o0
55000.00 5
3
1101302 Clearing BGrubtin
TREE
15
230,40 S
3750.00
3739]
5609.55
$810% S
12 60000
5
3000000
1
4
2104.501 Rianiurb6 Gulbr
LF
235
500 S
1175.00
5.02
1367.70
$18.00
3760.00
5
352500
2
8
21GLW3 Remove Concrete Pavement
OF
2370
100
2370.00
.78
1848.80
12.32 S
549040
$2,50
2800.00
5200
1080.00
2104.505 Remove SiWmin0us Pavamanl
BY
620
075 S
IBS 00
,53. 78
2331.20
517.0E S
10540.00
270 S
23]0.00
600 S
8
2104,508 Remove Curb Box
EA
3
100.00
30000
507.53
1 522,59
550000 S
1501) 00
5
3]20.00
1 Now
25.00
9
210/5119 Remove Drain s. SWct..
EA
I
mm S
800.00
$72122
721.22
$710.% S
710.00
.50
2000.00
10
2104511 Sa n Concrete Pavement Full De Ih
LF
180
500
900,00
$5.18
932.40
$1.25
765.00
52.00 E
1Now
1000
11
2101.513 Savnn Bit Pavement PON in
LF
39) S
600 S
3120%
12M &
811.20
$3)38]
3]38]
5150.00
150.00
$500.00 E
12
2101.523 Salva eCastin
EA
1 3
No.W
430 S
TOMO
7740.00
SIM s
70000
WM
1950.00
15(10 S
6450.00
17
2112.602 Su red. Pre are0on-File Station Pekin Lot
3
3%,00
JWS.62
36832
5211000
20000
125000
25M.%
1.00
13
2101523 helve 0 drenl
EA
1
)sA.00 S
)50.00
1015%
1015.00
1000.00
1000.00
500.00
1500.00
3
14
2105.501 Common Excavation L
CY
840 S
1800 E
11520.00
529.10 E 18675.20
515.]5 S
10080.00
$30.00 S
19200.00
200.00
15
2105.521 Granular Barlow L
CY
830
20.00 S
1280000
0.01 $
630
16.50 5
1039500
$1000
119]0 00
/00.00
16
214.501 Subteen Pre re0on-Trail
RS
14
1)500
2450.%
33M.57 $
429198
191 5
268800
800.00 E
12600.00
30859.00
18
2211.501 Assimilates San Gu.5
TON
480
2600 $
1248000
20.28 S
9734.40
2550 S
1224000
$24.00
1152000
35200.00
19
2232501 MITI Bituminous Sudan 1.5'
SV
30
tow S
3%00
ID% S
379.80
1000
30000
]5ol)
200.00
4
21
2350.501 T SP 9.5 M20 Course Mix 25
TN
200
100.00
2800000
01.17 S 2272]60
%.%
252%.00
11000
2250.00
3080000
$2450.% S
22
2380.501 T SP 9.5 Weadn Cdurae Mix 3 C
TN
3O
9000
2 700.00
122.88
S 8%90
$176.00 S
5280.00
$175.0 S
5251M
STO W
23
2380501 Type SP 12.5 Asserted Course Mix 3C
TN
3O
90.00
2)00.00
$122.88 $
3 I 40
$137.50
1125.00
$175.0
5250%
5150.00 5
24
2380.505 IT. SP 9.5 Bit. Mixture for plans
TN
20
11500
230000
$122.891 E
245160
$250.00 S
500000
$25a.ao S
5%0.00
15.00
25
2411.618 Modula BI.& Reatenfing Wall
OF
75
02.00 S
210000
80AII $
6010.511
$120.00 S
900000
III S
4875.00
18.50
26
2503.511 12' RC Pips, Sewer DES Nos Cie.. V
LF
32 S
5000 S
10%.00
$85,48
2 ]35.36
84.00 S
28811.00
50 00 S
t 60oM0
5.%
27
2503.602 Conned b Einstein Sbrtn Sewer
EA
1
50000 S
500.00
31,265.16 S
1255.15
S1234.
1234.00
20131.01
2000,00
W.
28
2503.602 Conned to Eantinto Sanitary Bever S.M.
EA
1 5
Now S
00
it348.29
134659
1325,40 E
1325.00
2%0.00
2000.00
5.00
29
2503602 4' Sewer Sema Cleanout
EA
1
300.00 S
300.00
1287.52
1287.52
1265.00
126500
5600.00 $
80000
ae 015.00
Jt
2503603 4- PVC Pi Sewer-SUetlule d0
LF
20
20,40 A
400.00
9.75
1795.00
W.00 $
1760.00
51000 $
20000
1200.00
32
2504.802 Conned ld--mr 6 -SIP Water Man
EA
1 5
7%.00 S
7%.00
597786 f
977.66
$961.00
961.00
$3500.00
SEN.
8300.00
33
2504.602 V Get. VaN. and Box
EA
t
2 200.00 S
2 Now
10,91 f
1 9]8.89
1915.00 S
1005.00
54 000.00 f
4000.00
250.00
3d
2504.802 'Curb Sir, and Boz
EA
1
400.00 E
1G%.00
5945.81
3782.44
1930.00 S
372 0.%
1000,40
40011.%
2500.%
35
l
2501.602 Hydro rasion Sto
EA
1
400.00
4MO.Do
$558.80
558.80
E550.Oo $
5513.00
1000.00 E
1%0011
105.%
38
2504.602 Hydrant
Elk
1 $
450000
4500.%
50410.89
8410.89
58300.00 E
8300,40
9000.00
aorm a0
315.%
37
2504.603 8-Walennein OuUle iron CL 52
LF
8 f
50.%
3%00
%.I6
578%
$9500
570,40
100.00
60000
1125.00
38
2504.603 1-T K Co r Pl
LF
IN S
25,40
2 500 00
0% 5
8 090.%
00 S
0 %O.00
500
4,5010
55000
39
25%.521 ImMII GaY
EA
1
350.00
350.00
480.01
480.81
130.% S
6%.%
5500.00
5013.00
560055.00
40
25%.802 Construct Dears Structure 405
EA
1 5 2D%.OM
20,00.00
373869 s
373989
38)5.00
3875.00
5400.00
5100.00
5
43
2521.501 8'Conuete Welk
SF
8)0
12.00
10440.%
,42
7325.40
1350
117111
$1200
10410.00
_
N
2531.501 Conde4 Curb end GuBer Desi 8810
LF
185 S
22.00
d2%AO
3.02 E
0438.90
50.00 S
975000
539.00E
]605.00
IS
2531.501 Concreb Cub antl GUBer Oeai nB824
LF
40 f
2500
1000.00
J589
1415.60
10.00
1800.%
53900
1580.00
40
2531.818 8'Condab Orivewa Pavement
OF
1]50 S
8.50
11 J>S.DO
82 S
1150500
11.50
20125.00
0.00 S
15)50.00
50
2531.618 Truncated Domes
SF
110
85.00
]150.00
So.So
5555.%
555.%
BDSoO0
$6000
8600.00
8
51
2565801 TreMC Control
LB
1 S
1000.00
1000.00
510%.61
41]06.81
3810.00
3810.00
13000.00
13000,00
52
25)3.502 Sill Fanu T HI
LF
300
3.00
900.00
.97
1491.00
55.00
t 500.00
5
1 200.00
51
25]3530 Storm Di Inlet Protection
EA
8
150.% S
1200,40
14425
t 154,40
5150.00
1200.00
.00
5150.00
38100.00
7
55
2574.525 Common To..it iti
CV
NO
20.00
4000.00
37.93
910310
550.%
12000.00
30.%
7200.00
8
55
2575523 Erosion Control Blanket Cat 3
SV42ML$2M
S
5%.00
54.% S
Woo
5100
000.00
5.00 $
1000.%
9
57
2575.561 Hydraulic Soil Stabilizer T 5
SV
5350.00
1.02
2182.80
51.00
2140.00
E
8560.00
t0
58
35]5804 Seedin
SY
5850.00
7.27
1]011.80
7.15
16]3100
.W
7.00
16380.00
60
2582502 18'Solitl Line Write -Pain)
LF
110%
1.80
In So
ELBA S
5800
54500 E
28500
61
258250) Crovwalk Markin -Pain)SF
S
2100.00
52.14 S
1261.00
52.10 E
1.26000
$4 00 5
290000
•Tose,
$ 189,295.00
5203338.57
E 260,183.0
$ 304000.00
ALTERNATE BID-
TOTAL ESTIMATED
North Valley, Inc.
ASTECH
Barber Construction, Inc.
FIRE STATION 91 PARKING LOT RECONSTRUCTIONC.P. 18-26
PROJECT QUANTITIES
-
EST.
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
NOTES
ITEM NO. DEBCRPTION... ..
UNIT
QUAN:.
,PRICE
AMOUNT
PRICE
AMOUNT
..PRICE
AMOUNT
PRICE I
AMOUNT
2
2021.501 Mobilization Fire Station PVrNrc Lot
LS
1 E
3500.00 5
3500.00
$86718 5
867180
$750000
7500.00
55000.00 5
5000.00
1
4
I 2104.501 Remove curb 8 Culler
LF
435
S00
2175.00
55.82 S
2,631 70
$16.U)
89150.00
$12,00 $
5220%
5
2101.501 Remove l 0' PVC Storm Sewer Pi
LF
85 S
300
255%
t26 71
227035
526.25
223115
510.00 S
850.00
2
B
210/.503 Remove Concrete Pavement
OF
1010S
1.00 S
104000
1091
94690
$2,50
2800.00
5200
1080.00
7
2101505 Relieve Bilumurso. Pavement
BY
3250 11
0]5
243700
216
7020.00
270 S
8775%
600 S
19500.%
10
21U 511 Seri Concrete Pavement Fell De
LF
30
5.00 f
160.005.18
f
155,40
S
135.00
25.00
TOM
11
2ID4.513 Sarin Bit Pavement full M N
LF
110
B.DO
.50
880.00
2.00 S
228.00
52.00 E
220,130
1000
1.10000
12
21U623 Salva.Contin
EA
1
30000
Ne.W
$3)38]
3]38]
5150.00
150.00
$500.00 E
500.%
3
II
2105.501 Common Exceva8on L
CY
430 S
TOMO
7740.00
20.02
8952.60
10.50 S
451590
15(10 S
6450.00
17
2112.602 Su red. Pre are0on-File Station Pekin Lot
SY
3250
050 S
1625.00
1.15 S
3737.50
W. 5
2782.50
1.00
3250.00
18
2211.501 q re b Base Close 5
TON
10 S
28.00
280.00
3].40 f
374.00
20.00 $
200.00
50.% S
500.00
19
2232501 .III Bitumb.us SUrbM 1.5
SV
20
10.00
200.00
$12%
253.20
10.00
200.00
50.00 1
1000.00
20
235].502 Blluminoue Metedal For Terk Coal
Gel
150
5.00
750.00
711 S
481.50
3.00 S
/00.00
25.00 f
3750.00
22
2380.501 T SP 8.5 Weedn Course Mix JC
IN
310
93.00 $
27900.00
60.83 S
25057.30
%.90
30859.00
110.00
34100,00
80.501 T SP 125 Wea0 Course M4 C
TN
100
woo
311000.00
724]
281188.00
88.00 S
35200.00
710% S
440%.0060.505
T SP OS Bit, Museum for Pirelli
TN
10
"LOS
1150.00
5122.58 $
1220.80
200.00
2000.%
25000 S
25%.0003602
4' Sewn Sarno CInecd
EA
1
20000
30000
32409.56
1189.56
$2450.% S
2/50.00
$50000 $
5(10.0003.802EA
1
500.00
50000
94.52 S
894.52
STO W
700.%
$120000 $
12W23
11.501 Random Ri ma Class 11
CY
5
11000
550.00
.11E2.570
55
5150.00 5
]50.00
EID000 S
50000
1501 4'Cancrele Welk
SF
830
5.00
3150.00
]970
15.00
91WN
900 S
5670.001.501
O'Concrete Walk
SF
132
12.00
158100
8.4376
18.50
2178.00
$2000 5
264000
1.501 Concrete Curb antl Sutlr Ds n0 is
LF
035
22.00
95]000
32.5865
5.%
19575.00
34.01) S
14790,4031.504
0'C -1. Voll 11-1
SY
an
IOD.00
6000.00
102.8721)
W.
5100.00
97.00 $
5820,00
31.6112 Clean.. Patti Conc. Curb.GoMNoinl
EA
25
20.00
50,00102815
5.00
825.00
25.00 E
5825.00
1.018 8'Candeb pavement
SF
4385
9.50 S
Ua8J.50
90000
111.00
ae 015.00
14.00
61110.001618
Truncated Domes
SF
24
85.00 S
1580,00
50.5000
50.% S
1200.00
5.00
15800053
25]5505 Sod T lawn
By
800
500
300000
10830
110.50 S
8300.00
84%%
5I
25]2530 S1artn Oreln lnlelProlec80n
EA
1
15000 S
15000
373.9]]
250.00
250.00
mom
500,00
]
55
2574525 Common Topsoil BDl3aW L
CY
50 S
20.00 S
1000.00
631
2315.50
SOHO $
2500.%
DAO
1500.00
B
58
2575523 Erosion Control Blanket Cob 3
SY
2013
2.50
$0.00
5.08 f
101.60
525 f
105.%
25.00 S
500.00
57
25]5561 MOreulic Sail SbMl¢erT 5
SV
150 S
2.50
375.00
$2,40. S
380.00
.50 s
315.%
10.00 f
1500.%
58
2,45604 Seadm
SV
150 $
2.50 $
375.0M53S
0
ZW S
1125.00
low S
1500.00
59
2582502 d- SOI,d Line V.Miie-Pain)
LF
1000 S
050 5
500000
50.55 5
55000
5125
1250.00258250218"Solid
Line Nhte-Paint
LF
35 5
200 5
]000
EL60 3
560055.00
S
1925.%62
2582602 Pavemenl Meese a Paint HandmaS mbol
EA
2 5
15008 5
30000
55500 S
11000
520000 S
IN Mr
_
Total
S 15735400
51'1.11494
5 2059]1]5
-__
S 24].4/000
TOTAL BID
S 326.659.00
5360,453.51
3 074,155.15
$ 551,140.00
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Council Members
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
Schedule August EDA meeting
July 17, 2018
INTRODUCTION
01
The Council is requested to schedule an Economic Development Authority (EDA) meeting at 6:00
pm before the August 21, 2018 City Council meeting.
DISCUSSION
Tentative agenda items for an EDA meeting have been identified as follows:
1. Approve Meeting Minutes
2. Commercial Activity Updates
3. Redevelopment Updates
4. Other Business
Other items may be added upon request, or the meeting will be cancelled if no new
information comes forward on the identified agenda items.
ACTION REQUESTED
Schedule an EDA meeting at 6:00 pm before the August 21, 2018 City Council meeting.
ted,
11 1 Mow
�.
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Councilmembers
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
Administrator's Report
July 17, 2018
The City Administration and the Department Heads present at the meeting will provide a brief
verbal update on various items of interest to the City Council and to the residents at the meeting.
Listed below are a few areas of interest:
1. Administration & City Department Activities
2. Update on Development/CIP Projects
3. Legislative Updates
4. Meeting reminders
Upon receipt of the meeting packet, if a member of the Council would like an update on a particular
item, please notify me so an adequate update can be made.
iitted,