HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC - June 6, 2017Google ?CNb6W^
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
Regular City Council Meeting — Tuesday, June 6, 2017
Call to Order — 7:00 p.m.
Pledge of Allegiance
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
1. Approval of Minutes (5/16/17 Regular)
Consent Items
2. Approve Payment of Claims — Finance
3. Accept Petition/Order Feasibility Report/1/17-38/2462 — 138'h Ave. NW/WM - Engineering
4. Accept Resignation of Darrin Hansen, Streets Maintenance Worker -Administration
5. Approve Request to Waive Tournament Fee for The Heroes Tourney -Tribute to MN Troops — Engineering
6. Approve Final Plat Catchers Creek 2nd Addition — Mark Smith — Planning
7. Approve Final Plat PSM Addition (Replat of Clocktower Commons)— Classic Construction — Planning
8. Approve Extension of Liquor License/Beef O'Brady's —Administration
9. Approve Resolution Accepting Contribution from the Andover Youth Hockey Association/Andover
Community Center — Community Center
10. Approve Refuse/Recycler Hauler Licenses —Administration
Discussion Items
11. Consider - Variance — Addition to Accessory Structure — 16422 Hanson Blvd NW — Dover Kennels -
Planning
12. Consider - Conditional Use Permit — Massage Therapy Home Occupation - 15824 Olive St NW — Lisa
Scholl - Planning
13. Consider - Conditional Use Permit- Exterior Storage, Upper Midwest Athletic Construction — 3017 16151
Ave NW — Planning
14. Consider - City Code Amendments to Title 12 Zoning Regulations and Title 13 Planning and Development
- Planning
15. Consider - Rezoning of Rural Reserve Residential District — Planning
16. Consider — Ordinance Summary Publication - Planning
Staff Items
17. Administrator'sReport —Administration
Mayor/Council Input
Adjournment
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and City Council
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administr,
FROM: Michelle Harmer, Deputy City
SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes
DATE: June 6, 2017
INTRODUCTION
The following minutes were provided by TimeSaver, reviewed by Administration and
submitted for City Council approval:
May 16, 2017 Regular
DISCUSSION
The minutes are attached for your review.
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to approve the above minutes.
Respectfully submitted,
Michelle Harmer
Deputy City Clerk
Attach: Minutes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
REGULAR ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL MEETING — MAY 16, 2017
MINUTES
The Regular Bi -Monthly Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Julie
Trude, May 16, 7:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover,
Minnesota.
Councilmembers present: Mike Knight, Valerie Holthus and James Goodrich
Councilmember absent: Sheri Bukkila
Also present: City Administrator, Jim Dickinson
Community Development Director, Joe Janish
Director of Public Works/City Engineer, David Berkowitz
City Attorney, Scott Baumgartner
Others
PLEDGE OFALLEGL9NCE `
RESIDENT FORUM
No one wished to address the Council.
AGENDA APPROVAL
Additions to the agenda were:
Item 11A Approve Used Vehicle Sales Business License/16191 Round Lake Boulevard NW
Item 13A Approve Equine Permit Request (Yard Requirements) at 5110 — 163`d Lane NW
Motion by Holthus, Seconded by Knight, to approve the Agenda as amended above. Motion carried
unanimously.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
April 25, 2017, Workshop Meeting: Correct as written.
Motion by Holthus, Seconded by Goodrich, to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried
unanimously.
May 2, 2017, Regular Meeting: Correct as written.
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes —May 16, 2017
Page 2
1 May 2, 2017, Closed Meeting: Correct as written.
2
3 Motion by Knight, Seconded by Holthus, to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried
4 unanimously.
5
6 May 10, 2017, Special Meeting: Correct as written.
7 May 10, 2017, Workshop Meeting: Correct as written.
8
9 Motion by Knight, Seconded by Holthus, to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried
10 unanimously.
11
12 CONSENT ITEMS
13
14 Item 2 Approve Payment of Claims
15 Item 3 Approve Plans & Specs/Order Ad for Bids/17-16, Andover Blvd. NW Trail & 16-18,
16 Hanson Blvd. NW Trail Reconstruction (See Resolution R037-17)
17 Item 4 Approve Change Order #1/14-15/Fox Meadows Park Redevelopment (See Resolution
18 R038-17)
19 Item 5 Approve JPA/16-32/Painting Signal at Bunker Lake Blvd. NW & Quinn St. NW
20 Item 6 Approve Refuse/Recycler Hauler Licenses
21 Item 7 Approve Joint Powers Agreement Anoka County/Assessment Services Contract
22 Item 8 Accept Contribution/Andover Lions/Fire Department/Remembering When Fire
23 Prevention Program (See Resolution R039-17)
24 Item 9 Accept Petition for Sanitary Sewer (Septic)/Approve Resolution Ordering Project/16770
25 Wren Street NW (See Resolution R040-17)
26 Item 10 Approve Appointment Streets Maintenance Worker
27 Item 11A Approve Used Vehicle Sales Business License/16191 Round Lake Blvd NW
28 Item 11 Adopt Resolution/Set Annual Income for Deferred Assessments & Reduced Sanitary
29 Sewer Rates (See Resolution R041-17)
30
31 Motion by Knight, Seconded by Holthus, approval of the Consent Agenda as amended. Motion
32 carried unanimously.
33
34 ANOKA COUNTYSHERIFFS OFFICE MONTHL Y REPOR T
35
36 Commander Brian Podany gave the monthly Sheriff's report. Mayor Trude expressed appreciation
37 for patrols by the department and attention given to distracted driving. She also noted she had
38 concerns about parking on a street in a construction area, and more specifically concern for children
39 when "bottle -necking" is utilized by residents themselves to reduce traffic in construction areas.
40
41 PRESENTATION —2016AUDITREPORT
42
43 Mr. Dickinson reviewed the staff report with the Council.
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes — May 16, 2017
Page 3
1 Mr. Dickinson explained Peggy Moeller, CPA, an Audit Partner with the City' s auditing firm,
2 Redpath and Company, Ltd., would be providing a presentation to the City Council at the meeting
3 related to the City of Andover Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) as of December 31,
4 2016 and the corresponding Management Report.
5
6 It was explained that the City is required to have an independent audit conducted annually. The 2016
7 Audit was conducted throughout the months of January, February, March and April. The Finance
8 Staff was very involved in the audit process. Of significant importance to the Council was the City
9 received an "unqualified opinion." There was no budget impact, and the presentation, financial
10 report, corresponding management report, report on internal controls, independent auditor's report,
11 report on legal compliance and a communication with those charged with governance were provided
12 as informational.
13
14 Ms. Moeller recognized the City for receiving a "Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in
15 Financial Reporting" for 2015.
16
17 The fund balance on December 31, 2016, was $7,796,745. Approximately 81% of the General
18 Fund's revenue sources are from property taxes and state aids and these revenue sources are
19 generally not received until the second half of the fiscal year. The minimum General Fund
20 unassigned balance should be $5,825,877 and the amount available is $7,650,328.
21
22 Mayor Trude stated her appreciation for the good audit report. Councilmember Knight agreed and
23 acknowledged staff for their good work.
24
25 Motion by Holthus, Seconded by Knight, to receive the 2016 Audit Report. Motion carried
26 unanimously.
27
28 Audit reports can be provided to residents upon request.
29
30 Mr. Dickinson commented the increase in the number of homes built during 2016 was a "windfall"
31 to the City. He spoke to sustainability and to not stress the resident tax -payers. Mr. Dickinson
32 acknowledged City staff members that contributed significantly to the work involved to complete the
33 audit.
34
35 APPR 0VEEQVINE PERMIT REQ VES T(YARDREQ UIREMENTS)ATS110-163RDLANE
36 NW
37
38 Mr. Dickinson reviewed the information with the Council. He asked the Council to keep in mind
39 that everything that is being proposed meets all of the City's zoning requirements. He noted there is
40 a restriction in the zoning code regarding horses in the side or front yard and there are 5 or 6 of these
41 types of situations in the community. At that time, it was vetted through the previous Equestrian
42 Council. In the future, code provisions will be proposed to the City Council so that staff will review
43 these requests and make recommendations to the Council.
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes — May 16, 2017
Page 4
1 Mr. Dickinson asked the applicant to make sure the neighbors were okay with the plan. He
2 confirmed the applicant did receive letters of support from those neighbors. A location map was
3 shared with the Council. Mr. Dickinson noted this is a unique property because of the shape of the
4 lot and there was a plan for a corral and two pasture areas. He also pointed out the angle of the
5 planned improvements follows the curvature of the road, instead of being straight in line with the
6 house. The review by the Council is needed because the property is less than 3 acres and the side
7 yard is needed due to the curve of the lot/road.
9 Councilmember Holthus asked about the animal structure. Mr. Dickinson stated the shed is a three
10 stall garage and the exterior matches the house.
11
12 The applicant, Jill Ahart of 5110 163`d Lane, stated that garage doors would be added in the fall and
13 will remain open on one side, until then, to keep the structure cooler. She indicated she would like to
14 "get by" without an electric fence, if possible. Mayor Trude noted the business of the bus stop in the
15 area.
16
17 Councilmember Knight asked if there was an area to ride. Ms. Ahart explained there is 45 acres
18 south of her property along with trails that she has permission to use.
19
20 Ms. Ahart stated the barn would be 81 feet from the road. Councilmember Knight asked the
21 location. Mr. Dickinson confirmed the property is west of 7`h Avenue, southwest of the turkey farm.
22 Mayor Trude reminded the resident about the importance of keeping the improvements and yard
23 well maintained.
24
25 Motion by Holthus, Seconded by Goodrich, to approve the Equine Permit Request. Motion carried
26 unanimously.
27
28 CONDITIONAL USEPERMITAMENDMENT/REVISEDPLANNED UNITDEVELOPMENT
29 —ANDOVER CLOCKTOWER COMMONS — CLASSIC CONSTRUCTION
30
31 Mr. Janish explained the original CUP/PUD approval was granted in September of 2003. The PUD
32 which is located in a Shopping Center District included five (5) lots consisting of a gas convenience
33 store (Lot 1), fast food restaurant (Lot 2), bank (Lot 3), restaurant (Lot 4) and retail (Lot 5). The
34 approval also included a landscape plan identifying the common area amenities including a clock
35 tower feature and related landscaping on Lot 4. Cross parking and access agreements were also put
36 in place.
37
38 There was an amendment made in 2009 related to the direct access to Crosstown Boulevard NW in
39 the form of an intersection, which was approved.
40
41 An amendment was also made in 2014, related to Lot 3, Block 1, Andover Clocktower Commons, to
42 convert the "bank" site to a retail trade and service building. Lot 4, Block 1, was also converted from
43 a "restaurant lot" in the original PUD for a retail, trade and service building and allowed for a 20 -foot
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes —May 16, 2017
Page 5
1 encroachment in to the required 30 -foot setback from Crosstown Boulevard NW. This
2 encroachment created a 10 -foot setback for the future buildings on Lot 4, Block 1.
4 The significant proposed changes or proposed revisions for this amendment are as follows:
5 • Changing the PUD from 5 lots to 6 lots;
6 • Adjusting the setback on proposed Lot 2, Block 1, PSM Addition and also allowing
7 for a smaller lot width for Lot 2, Block 1, PSM Addition; and
8 • Proposal of a garbage enclosure that will be shared for the two proposed lots and will
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
cross over the property lines.
This lot was originally approved as a bank lot with a 10,000 -square foot building. In 2014, an
11,200 square foot retail, trade, and service building was proposed and approved in place of the bank
building. The applicant is seeking to split Lot 3, Block 1, to create two lots for two separate
buildings. Proposed Lot 1, Block 1, is 5 0,5 57 square feet (approx. 1.16 acres). The proposed "retail,
trade, and service" building is proposed to be approximately 7,000 square feet. Proposed Lot 2,
Block 1, is 30,949 square feet (approx. 0.79 acres). The proposed retail building is expected to be a
7,440 retail, trade and service building. The building will encroach 20+/- feet into the required 30 -
foot setback from Crosstown Boulevard NW. This lot does not meet the standard requirements of
the zoning classification for lot width at the street. The code requires 200 feet and the applicant has
shown 163.74. As noted when a Planned Unit Development is created deviations can occur. City
staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission are recommending to allow for the deviation. A
buyer exists for the proposed Lot 1, Block 1, PSM Addition and Lot 2, Block 1, would remain for
future development.
Planning and Zoning Commissioners discussed parking in the Clocktower Commons Development
and the cross -access easements. Staff noted the parking easement allows patrons to utilize
businesses to park within the development and parking calculations are determined as part of the
Commercial Site Plan review process and building permit review process. The Planning and Zoning
Commissioners discussed when the "features" at the intersection of Crosstown Boulevard and
Hanson Boulevard would be completed. Staff indicated while reviewing the development file the
"feature" would be constructed as development occurs on that particular lot.
Mr. Janish noted in doing calculations, the parking was confirmed to be adequate for the request at
hand. The Planning and Zoning Commission did make a positive recommendation and discussed the
parking quite extensively. The Planning and Zoning Commissioners are also interested in the
"feature" being provided for.
Mayor Trude made reference to the daycare proposed. She is wondering about the fencing being
utilized as it relates to the safety of the children and appearances for the PUD. She noted there will
no longer be a drive-through like a bank.
Councilmember Holthus asked Mr. Janish to show the location of the fencing and what kinds of
screened fencing would be used considering that kids will be playing outside. He indicated there
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes — May 16, 2017
Page 6
1 would be decorative fencing, trees and landscaping, as shown on the plan. The particular fencing has
2 not been selected yet.
3
4 Mr. Janish reminded the Council the decision before them was about the set -backs and zoning.
5
6 Kurt Strandlund, of Classic Construction Company is proposing a black vinyl chain link fencing to
7 provide screening but not giving kids a feeling of being "penned in." Mayor Trude expressed
8 concern about the use of chain link fencing and that property circulation be addressed. Mr.
9 Strandlund also stated there would be trees, shrubs and colorful playground equipment.
10
11 Councilmember Goodrich stated he is not concerned about the variations with set -backs.
12 Councilmember Knight expressed concerns about sufficient parking. Mayor Trude referred to the
13 next steps being to work with staff on the commercial site plan review.
14
15 Mayor Trude asked about the daycare's business plan. Rhiannon Paradise, the daycare representative
16 stated there would be some temporary signage up and a website. There will be about 100 children
17 served by the center with a focus on organic foods and gardening. Plans are being made to break
18 ground early in the summer with hopes to be open before the end of the year.
19
20 Motion by Holthus, Seconded by Knight, to approve Resolution No. R042-17, amending the
21 approved CUP to amend the PUD of Andover Clocktower Commons. Motion carried unanimously.
22
23 PRELIMINARY PLAT (REPLAT INTO TWO LOTS) OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, ANDOVER
24 CLOCKTOWER COMMONS; LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HANSON
25 BLVD NWAND CROSSTOWN BLVD NW— CLASSIC CONSTRUCTION
26
27 Mr. Janish stated the Planning and Zoning Commissioners did not have much discussion on this
28 item, except related to parking. He shared plat drawings to further highlight the request.
29
30 Mr. Janish reviewed the staff report with the Council. The property is proposed to be re -platted and
31 create two lots. Staff does not expect major impacts to the local and regional plans and ordinances
32 due to the splitting of the existing lots. Access to the property would not add additional direct access
33 onto a city or county roadway. The traffic movements would be internal on private roadways and is
34 consistent with the past proposals.
35
36 The Anoka County Highway Department did not provide comments on the plat due to the proposal
37 not fronting a county roadway.
38
39 The two lots proposed are consistent with the Planned Unit Development site plan.
40
41 Each building constructed within the development will be subject to the Commercial Site Plan
42 review process.
43
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes —May 16, 2017
Page 7
1 As a part of this process, utility, grading, drainage and erosion control, landscape, and detailed site
2 plans will be reviewed and approved by City staff.
4 The Planning and Zoning Commissioners had mentioned concerns regarding the interior circulation
5 of traffic and pedestrians within Clocktower Commons, due to kids cutting through parking lots.
Motion by Knight, Seconded by Holthus, to approve Resolution No. R043-17, amending the
preliminary plat of "PSM Addition" by Classic Construction. Motion carried unanimously.
10 SCHEDULE EDA MEETING
11
12 Mr. Dickinson requested the Council schedule an EDA Meeting to discuss topics as detailed in the
13 staff report.
14
15 The Council discussed the draft agenda and available dates. Planned discussion items relate to Arbor
16 Oaks and the refinancing proposed for the project.
17
18 Motion by Holthus, Seconded by Knight, to schedule an EDA Meeting on June 6, 2017, at 6:00 p.m.
19 Motion carried unanimously.
20
21 ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
22
23 City staff updated the Council on the administration and city department activities, legislative
24 updates, updates on development/CIP projects, and meeting reminders/community events.
25
26 (Meetings) Mr. Dickinson has been attending the following meetings: Youth First, QCTV — finance
27 related specific to the audit, developers looking at Andover to invest in — both residential and
28 commercial.
29
30 (Legislative) Mr. Dickinson has been monitoring legislative activity related to the WDE waste pit.
31 It is currently in the Governor's proposal and the House proposal. The House bonding bill has
32 increased to $800M. The likelihood of funding is "looking good." Met Council government reform
33 has been tied into the transportation bill, with the Governor now able to appoint the Chair, which is a
34 change from the original proposal.
35
36 (Public Works/Engineering) Mr. Berkowitz commented repairs on streets have already started with
37 attention to crack filling and seal coating. The early start has allowed for gravel road improvements
38 getting done, along with spraying for dust control, and 3 playground installations (with 2 already
39 completed). The Utilities Department, with work focused on sewer, water and storm sewers, makes
40 sure that when there are heavy rains, there is little to no impact. Vehicle Maintenance is critical to
41 the work by keeping the rest of the staff working and equipment moving. Trail maintenance and
42 construction is also progressing, including the area near the Community Center.
43
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes — May 16, 2017
Page 8
Councilmember Goodrich asked about how this work is done and if the trail is "stripped down" to
the bottom. Mr. Berkowitz replied trail maintenance happens every year, but this year there will be a
focus on safety issues.
Rain may slow down street/trail reconstruction.
(Planning & Zoning) Mr. Janish stated that Planning & Zoning is taking advantage of a 2nd meeting
this month to move some issues forward.
9
10 MAYOR/COUNCIL INPUT
11
12 (New Businesses) Joy Kitchen has their sign up and is looking to get their Certificate of Occupancy
13 this week. The restaurant should be opening in a couple of weeks. Natural Nails is open and the
14 dental office is under construction. Retail is doing well in Andover
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
(Legislative) Mayor Trude reported she has been to the capital to talk about funding for the WDE
site. Representative Scott supports not waiting another year and sees it as an urgent matter. Senators
Abeler and Senjem have also been helpful. The Mayor stated she appreciates knowing that they care
about the safety of the residents before there are impacts. Funding for a lot of projects in Anoka
County has been added in the last 2 years — funding for Highway 10 and roads around the National
Sports Center.
(Mise) Mayor Trude complemented Mr. Dickinson for being flexible and working on the equine
permit when staff were away. She also suggested that the first 5 pages of the audit report, with the
City's history and projects of substance in the past year, be made into a pdf file and be posted on the
City's website. It could be helpful to Girl and Boy Scouts earning badges.
(YMCA) MN Cities Publication article talks about public/private partnerships. The YMCA is a
great facility and partnership for the City and a real success story.
Councilmember Knight notes that organizations across the country are looking at this partnership as
an example. A link to the article was recommended on the City's website.
Mayor Trude reminded residents they can use the YMCA 4 times a year for free by showing their
driver's license.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Holthus, Seconded by Knight, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting
adjourned at 8:33 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Marlene White, Recording Secretary
1
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes — May 16, 2017
Page 9
REGULAR ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES — MAY 16, 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PLEDGEOF ALLEGIANCE.........................................................................................................
1
RESIDENTFORUM......................................................................................................................
1
AGENDAAPPROVAL..................................................................................................................
1
APPROVALOF MINUTES...........................................................................................................
1
CONSENTITEMS.........................................................................................................................
2
Item 2 Approve Payment of Claims.........................................................................................
2
Item 3 Approve Plans & Specs/Order Ad for Bids/17-16, Andover Blvd. NW Trail & 16-18
Hanson Blvd. NW Trail Reconstruction (R037-17)...........................................................
2
Item 4 Approve Change Order 41/14-15/Fox Meadows Park Redevelopment (R038-17) .....
2
Item 5 Approve JPA/16-32/Painting Signal at Bunker Lake Blvd. NW & Quinn St. NW .....
2
Item 6 Approve Refuse/Recycler Hauler Licenses..................................................................
2
Item 7 Approve Joint Powers Agreement Anoka County/Assessment Services Contract ......
2
Item 8 Accept Contribution/Andover Lions/Fire Department/Remembering When Fire
Prevention Program(R039-17)...........................................................................................
2
Item 9 Accept Petition for Sanitary Sewer (Septic)/Approve Resolution Ordering
Project/16770 Wren Street NW(R040-17).........................................................................2
Item 10 Approve Appointment Streets Maintenance Worker .....................................................
2
Item 11 Adopt Resolution/Set Annual Income for Deferred Assessments & Reduced Sanitary
SewerRates(R041-17).......................................................................................................
2
Item 11A Approve Used Vehicle Sales Business License/16191 Round Lake Blvd. NW.........
2
ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE MONTHLY REPORT ................................................
2
PRESENTATION — 2016 AUDIT REPORT.................................................................................
2
APPROVE EQUINE PERMIT REQUEST (YARD REQUIREMENTS) AT 5110 —163RD LANE
NW.............................................................................................................................................
3
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT/REVISED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT — ANDOVER CLOCKTOWER COMMONS — CLASSIC
CONSTRUCTION(R042-17)....................................................................................................
4
PRELIMINARY PLAT (REPLAT INTO TWO LOTS) OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, ANDOVER
CLOCKTOWER COMMONS; LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HANSON
BLVD NW AND CROSSTOWN BLVD NW — CLASSIC CONSTRUCTION (R043-17).....
6
SCHEDULEEDA MEETING........................................................................................................
7
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT....................................................................................................
7
(Meetings)...................................................................................................................................
7
(Legislative)................................................................................................................................
7
(Public Works/Engineering).......................................................................................................
7
(Planning & Zoning)...................................................................................................................
8
MAYOR/COUNCIL INPUT..........................................................................................................
8
(New Businesses)...................................................................................................... ..................
8
(Legislative)................................................................................................................................
8
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes —May 16, 2017
Page 10
(Misc)......................................................................................................8
(YMCA)...................................................................................................................................... 8
ADJOURNMENT........................................................................................................................... 8
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administratgr�
FROM: Lee Brezinka, Finance Manager
SUBJECT: Payment of Claims
DATE: June 6, 2017
INTRODUCTION
Attached are disbursement edit lists for claims related to the on going business of the City of Andover.
Claims totaling $217,243.36 on disbursement edit lists #1—#3 from 05/17/17 to 06/01/17 have been issued and
released.
Claims totaling $593,360.32 on disbursement edit list #4 dated 06/06/17 will be issued and released upon
approval.
BUDGET IMPACT
The edit lists consist of routine payments with expenses being charged to various department budgets and
projects.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Andover City Council is requested to approve total claims in the amount of $810,603.68. Please note that
Council Meeting minutes will be used as documented approval.
Respectfully submitted,
Lee Brezinka
Attachments: Check Proof Lists
Accounts Payable
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
User: brendaf
Printed: 05/17/2017 - 3:06PM
Batch: 00412.05.2017
Invoice No Description
Vendor:
Allinal
Allina Health System
II10022034
2nd Qtr 2017 Medical Directorship
76.00
05/17/2017
Check Total:
Vendor:
AneomCon
Ancom Communications, Inc.
69276
MmitOI V Battery
Check Total:
Vendor:
AspenMil
Aspen Mills
197553
05/17/2017
Adam Kelly Uniform
Check Total:
Vendor:
AutoNam
AutoNation Ford White Bear Lake
398167
Labor to Repair Unit #133
398167
ACH Enabled:
Parts to Repair Unit #133
348.50
05/17/2017
Check Total:
Vendor:
BDSLaund
BDS Laundry Systems
S0I0121475
UniMac 25# Cabinet Washer
Check Total:
Vendor:
Boyerl
Boyer Track Parts
1147384
Switch for Unit #206
Check Sequence: 5
ACH Enabled:
Check Total:
Vendor:
Bro-Tex
Bro-Tex, Inc.
492663
Carpet Recycling
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
Check Sequence:1
586.99 05/17/2017 0101-42200-63010
586.99
?CN66V09RJtk
Reference
ACE Enabled: False
JYY.oV
Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False
273.26 05/17/2017 6100-48800-61115
273.26
Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False
369.80 05/17/2017 0101-46000-63010
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/17/2017 - 3:06 PM) Page 1
Check Sequence: 2
ACH Enabled:
False
76.00
05/17/2017
0101-42200-61020
76.00
Check Sequence: 3
ACH Enabled:
False
18.85
05/17/2017
0101-42200-61305
18.85
Check Sequence: 4
ACH Enabled:
False
348.50
05/17/2017
6100-48800-63135
949.53
05/17/2017
6100-48800-61115
1,298.03
Check Sequence: 5
ACH Enabled:
False
344.06
05/17/2017
0101-42200-63100
JYY.oV
Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False
273.26 05/17/2017 6100-48800-61115
273.26
Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False
369.80 05/17/2017 0101-46000-63010
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/17/2017 - 3:06 PM) Page 1
Invoice No Description
Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
369.80
Check Total:
Vendor. CenLiak
CenturyLink
763 755-0776
City Hall Service
763 755-0776
Public Works Service
763 755-0776
Fire Department Service
763 755-0776
Community Center Service
0101-41910-62030
Check Total:
Vendor: Colonial
Colonial Life & Accident
7156706-0501343
May 2017 Premium E-7156706
7156706-0501343
May 2017 Premium E-7156706
20.00
Check Total:
Vendor: Connex2
Connexus Energy
COM0000633
Fox Meadows Park Redevelopment
05/17/2017
Check Total:
Vendor: CrowRive
Crow River Farm Equipment
183674
Parts for Unit #99
Check Total:
Vendor: DTBMgmt
DTB Management LLC
16770 Wren St. NW (Septic)
ACH Enabled:
Check Total:
Vendor: ECM
ECM Publishers, Inc.
487574
Monthly Recycling Program & SEO
489539
Rezone Rural Reserve
489540
CUP Exterior Storage
489541
CUP Oliver St.
489542
Var Dover Kennels
Check Total:
Vendor: EganSery
Egan Service
JC10154667
04/17 Crosstown & Andover RR Maintenance
Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
369.80
Check Sequence: 8
ACH Enabled:
False
19.99
05/17/2017
0101-41910-62030
19.99
05/17/2017
0101-41930-62030
20.00
05/17/2017
0101-41920-62030
20.00
05/17/2017
2130-44000-62030
79.98
Check Sequence: 9
ACH Enabled:
False
9.60
05/17/2017
7100-00000-21218
217.41
05/17/2017
0101-00000-21210
227.01
Check Sequence: 10
ACE Enabled:
False
4,29225
05/17/2017
415049300-65300
4,292.25
Check Sequence: Il
ACH Enabled:
False
60.96
05/17/2017
6100-48800-61115
60.96
Check Sequence: 12
ACE Enabled:
False
20,000.00
05/17/2017
4120-49300-63010
20,000.00
Check Sequence: 13
ACH Enabled:
False
260.00
05/17/2017
0101-46000-63025
220.38
05/17/2017
0101-41500-63025
53.75
05/17/2017
0101-41500-63025
48.38
05/17/2017
0101-41500-63025
59.13
05/17/2017
0101-41500-63025
641.64
Check Sequence: 14
ACH Enabled:
False
773.75
05/17/2017
0101-43400-62300
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/17/2017 - 3:06 PM) Page 2
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Check Total:
345.10
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/17/2017 - 3:06 PM) Page 3
Check Total:
773.75
Vendor: EmerAppa
Emergency Apparatus Maint
Check Sequence: 15
91909
Parts to Repair Unit #4821
70.20
05/17/2017
6100-48800-61115
91909
Labor to Repair Unit #4821
325.00
05/17/2017
6100-48800-63135
91910
Labor to Repair Unit #4884
325.00
05/17/2017
6100-48800-63135
91910
Parts to Repair Unit #4884
84.24
05/17/2017
6100-48800-61115
91911
Labor to Repair Unit #4800
325.00
05/17/2017
6100-48800-63135
91911
Parts to Repair Unit #4800
84.24
05/17/2017
6100-48800-61115
91912
Parts to Repair Unit #4820
8.78
05/17/2017
6100-48800-61115
91912
Labor to Repair Unit #4820
325.00
05/17/2017
6100-48800-63135
91913
Parts to Repair Unit #4886
316.11
05/17/2017
6100-48800-61115
91913
Labor to Repair Unit #4986
1,593.25
05/17/2017
6100-48800-63135
91914
Part to Repair Unit #4808
28.08
05/17/2017
6100-48800-61115
91914
Labor to Repair Unit #4808
325.00
05/17/2017
6100-48800-63135
Check Total:
3,809.90
Vendor: Fastenal
Fastenal Company
Check Sequence: 16
M1411AM55780
Mise. Supplies
134.49
05/17/2017
5300-48300-61005
MNHAMS5780
Misc. Supplies
134.49
05/17/2017
5100-48100-61005
Check Total:
268.98
Vendor: Ferguson
Ferguson Waterworks #2516
Check Sequence: 17
0237016
Storm Sewer Supplies
573.44
05/17/2017
5300-48300-61145
Check Total:
573.44
Vendor: FitDisd
Fitness Distributing, Inc.
Check Sequence: 18
AFCA317
Cybex 770 at Total Body ARC Trainer Off
2,900.00
05/17/2017
0101-42200-61020
Check Total:
2,900.00
Vendor: G&K
G&K Services Inc
Check Sequence: 19
6182483430
Uniform Cleaning
161.06
05/17/2017
0101-4310051020
6182483430
Uniform Cleaning
23.02
05/17/2017
0101-43300-61020
6182483430
Uniform Cleaning
69.02
05/17/2017
0101-45000-61020
6182483430
Uniform Cleaning
23.01
05/17/2017
5100-4810051005
6182483430
Uniform Cleaning
46.01
05/17/2017
520048200-61005
6182483430
Uniform Cleaning
22.98
05/17/2017
610048800-61020
Check Total:
345.10
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/17/2017 - 3:06 PM) Page 3
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor: Gametime
Gametime
Check Sequence: 20
ACH Enabled:
False
PJI-0059888
Playground Equipment
2,515.96
05/17/2017
0101-45000-61020
Check Total:
2,515.96
Vendor: Hawkins2
Hawkins Inc
Check Sequence: 21
ACH Enabled:
False
4070654
Chemicals for Water Treatment Plant
4,093.28
05/17/2017
5100-48100-61040
Check Total:
4,093.28
Vendor: HDSuppW
HD Supply Waterworks, LTD.
Check Sequence: 22
ACH Enabled:
False
H109502
22 GA Cond Wire
259.30
05/17/2017
5100-48100-61035
Check Total:
259.30
Vendor: HIthPDen
Health Partners
Check Sequence: 23
ACH Enabled:
False
73024133
June 2017 Premium
3,898.04
05/17/2017
0101-00000-21208
73024133
June 2017 Premium
45,099.75
05/17/2017
0101-00000-21206
73024133
June 2017 Premium
1,152.27
05/17/2017
7100-00000-21218
Check Total:
50,150.06
Vendor: HydraPlu
Hydraulics Plus & Consulting
Check Sequence: 24
ACH Enabled:
False
8975
Labor to Repair Unit #08-408
116.25
05/17/2017
6100-48800-63135
8975
Pails to Repair Unit #08-408
24.06
05/17/2017
610048800-61115
Check Total:
140.31
Vendor: IngramBr
Brett Ingram
Check Sequence: 25
ACH Enabled:
False
Leam to Skate Coach
24.00
05/17/2017
2130-44300-63005
Check Total:
24.00
Vendor: JNJohnSS
J.N. Johnson Fire & Safety
Check Sequence: 26
ACH Enabled:
False
SOI.131785
Kitchen Maintenance Contract
324.25
05/17/2017
0101-41910-62300
Check Total:
324.25
Vendor: KensTree
Keds Tree Service
Check Sequence: 27
ACH Enabled:
False
276
Take Down Oak Tree @ 2151 159th Ln
675.00
05/17/2017
0101-43100-63010
Check Total:
675.00
Vendor: KineetEG
Kinect Energy Group
Check Sequence: 28
ACH Enabled:
False
258557/5852862
Community Center
6,249.95
05/17/2017
2130-44000-62015
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/17/2017 - 3:06 PM)
Page 4
Invoice No Description
258557/5950574 Public Works
Vendor: Menards
Menards
Check Total:
Vendor:
KothStev
Steve Kothman
44644
Returned CO Alarm
Refund Water Meter Deposit
Returned Steel Garage Door Bettor,
44765
Refund Water Meter Deposit
44832
Thermostat & Guard
Refund Water Meter Deposit
Return Thermostat
45049
Check Total:
Vendor:
Lawson
Lawson Products, Inc.
9304898961
Misc. Supplies
9304898962
Misc. Supplies
Misc. Supplies
Check Total:
Vendor:
Loes
Loe's Oil Company
74580
Oil Filters & Anti -Freeze Recycled
74742
Oil Filters & Anti -Freeze Recycled
Check Total:
Vendor:
MacQueen
MacQueen Equipment Inc.
P04117
Parts for Unit #525
Check Total:
Vendor: Menards
Menards
44639
CO Alarm
44639
Tools
44644
Returned CO Alarm
44701
Returned Steel Garage Door Bettor,
44765
Metal Clamp/Batteries/Drain Valve
44832
Thermostat & Guard
45047
Return Thermostat
45049
Tools
45307
Returned Misc. Supplies
45309
Tools
45437
Mise. Supplies
45437
Misc. Supplies
Check Total:
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
775.07 05/17/2017 0101-41930-62015
7,025.02
-37.77
-24.00
250.00
188.23
468.71
65.69
534.40
65.00
31.00
96.00
90.17
90.17
34.99
49.07
-34.99
-25.58
72.47
94.08
-68.90
17.49
-141.87
34.68
36.45
8.38
76.27
Check Sequence: 29
05/17/2017 5100-48100-55110
05/17/2017 5100-48100-55150
05/17/2017 5100-00000-24201
Check Sequence: 30
05/17/2017 6100-48800-61020
05/17/2017 610048800-61020
Check Sequence: 31
05/17/2017 01OIA6000-63010
05/17/2017 0101-46000-63010
Check Sequence: 32
05/17/2017 6100-48800-61115
Check Sequence: 33
05/17/2017 0101-41930-61120
05/17/2017 0101-41930-61205
05/17/2017 0101-41930-61120
05/17/2017 2130-44300-61120
05/17/2017 0101-45000-61020
05/17/2017 0101-41920-61120
05/17/2017 0101-41920-61120
05/17/2017 01OIA1930-61205
05/17/2017 5100-48100-61120
05/17/2017 0101-41930-61205
05/17/2017 0101-41920-61120
05/17/2017 0101-41930-61120
Reference
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/17/2017 - 3:06 PM) Page 5
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor: MetSales
Metro Sales Incorporated
Check Sequence: 34
ACH Enabled: False
1MV793603
May 2017 Ricoh Wide Format Lease
222.64
05/17/2017
2210-41600-62200
INV793603
May 2017 Ricoh Wide Format Lease
87.12
05/17/2017
0101-42300-62200
INV793603
May 2017 Ricoh Wide Format Lease
87.12
05/17/2017
0101-41600-62200
INV793603
May 2017 Ricoh Wide Format Lease
87.12
05/17/2017
0101-41500-62200
INV794091
Printer Cartridge for Wide Format Printer
14.13
05/17/2017
0101-42300-61020
INV794091
Printer Cartridge for Wide Format Printer
14.13
05/17/2017
0101-41600-61020
INV794091
Printer Cartridge for Wide Format Printer
14.13
05/17/2017
0101-41500-61020
INV794091
Printer Cartridge for Wide Format Printer
36.11
05/17/2017
2210-41600-61020
Check Total:
562.50
Vendor: MNEquipn
Minnesota Equipment
Check Sequence: 35
ACH Enabled: False
P60577
Parts for Units #514 & #515
315.75
05/17/2017
6100-48800-61115
Check Total:
315.75
Vendor: MTIDist
MTI Distributing Inc
Check Sequence: 36
ACH Enabled: False
1114207-00
10 Inch Wheel Asm & Bearing
391.94
05/17/2017
6100-48800-61115
Check Total:
391.94
Vendor: MCFOA
Municipal Clerk & Finance Officers Association
Check Sequence: 37
ACH Enabled: False
Membership Dues
40.00
05/17/2017
0101-41300-61320
Check Total:
40.00
Vendor: Munlimerg
Municipal Emergency Services, Inc.
Check Sequence: 38
ACH Enabled: False
IN1130332
Majestic Halo Hood
99.70
05/17/2017
0101-42200-61020
Check Total:
99.70
Vendor: NoAmSafe
North American Safety
Check Sequence: 39
ACH Enabled: False
27020
Lime Breeze TShirts
237.00
05/17/2017
0101-43100-61005
27020
Lime Breeze T -Shirts
76.66
05/17/2017
5100-48100-61005
27020
Lime Breeze T -Shirts
153.34
05/17/2017
5200-48200-61005
Check Total:
467.00
Vendor: NorthMec
Northland Mechanical
Check Sequence: 40
ACH Enabled: False
69595-65418
Replaced Pump in Boiler Room
955.86
05/17/2017
2130-44000-63105
Check Total:
955.86
Vendor: ORelAuto
O'Reilly Auto Parts
Check Sequence: 41
ACH Enabled: False
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/17/2017 - 3:06 PM) Page 6
Invoice No
Description
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number
Reference
3253-265096
Battery for Unit #13-591
42.99
05/17/2017
6100-48800-61115
Check Total:
42.99
Vendor: OxySvcCo
Oxygen Service Company
Check Sequence: 42
ACH Enabled:
False
03373659
Misc. Supplies
30.60
05/17/2017
6100-48800-61020
Check Total:
30.60
Vendor: PartiBou
Parties That Bounce, LLC
Check Sequence: 43
ACH Enabled:
False
403
Slide & Bounce House - Jan - April 2017
310.00
05/17/2017
2130-44400-63005
Check Total:
310.00
Vendor: PionSecu
Pioneer SecureShred
Check Sequence: 44
ACH Enabled:
False
30851
Shredding Service
1,350.00
05/17/2017
0101-46000-63010
Check Total:
1,350.00
Vendor: Plunkett
PlunketVs Pest Control, Inc.
Check Sequence: 45
ACH Enabled:
False
5666959
Pest Control
-5.00
05/17/2017
2130-00000-20301
5666959
Pest Control
77.52
05/17/2017
2130-44000-63010
Check Total:
72.52
Vendor: PovlitzB
Brad & Dana Povlitzki
Check Sequence: 46
ACH Enabled:
False
Interest
B and D Estates
1.28
05/17/2017
7200-41400-56910
Plat Escrow
B and D Estates
837.17
05/17/2017
7200-00000-24202
Check Total:
838.45
Vendor: PovProp
Povlitzki Properties LLP
Check Sequence: 47
ACH Enabled:
False
Plat Escrow
B & D Estates 2nd Addition
3,451.58
05/17/2017
7200-00000-24202
Plat Escrow
B & D Estates 2nd Addition
0.46
05/17/2017
7200-41400-56910
Check Total:
3,452.04
Vendor: PrestoGr
Presto Graphics Inc.
Check Sequence: 48
ACH Enabled:
False
58423
Window Envelopes
548.00
05/17/2017
0101-41400-61005
58423
Envelopes & Catalog Envelopes
152.78
05/17/2017
0101-41200-61005
58423
Envelopes & Catalog Envelopes
203.71
05/17/2017
0101-41500-61005
58423
Envelopes & Catalog Envelopes
152.78
05/17/2017
0101-41600-61005
58423
Envelopes & Catalog Envelopes
254.63
05/17/2017
0101-42300-61005
58423
Envelopes & Catalog Envelopes
101.85
05/17/2017
0101-41230-61005
58423
Envelopes & Catalog Envelopes
50.93
05/17/2017
0101-41300-61005
AP-Computer Check
Proof List by Vendor (05/17/2017 - 3:06 PM)
Page 7
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
58423 Envelopes & Catalog Envelopes 101.85 05/17/2017 0101-41400-61005
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/17/2017 - 3:06 PM) Page 8
Check Total:
1,566.53
Vendor: ProLab
Pro -Lab
Check Sequence: 49
ACH Enabled: False
Mold Test
40.00
05/17/2017
0101-41930-63010
Check Total:
40.00
Vendor: R&R
R&R Specialties of Wisconsin
Check Sequence: 50
ACH Enabled: False
0062226 -IN
Blade Sharpening
40.50
05/17/2017
2130-44300-61020
0062287 -IN
Blade Sharpening
61.00
05/17/2017
213041300-61020
Check Total:
101.50
Vendor: Simplex
SimplexGrinnell LP
Check Sequence: 51
ACH Enabled: False
749397552
Alarm System Maintenance Contract
420.00
05/17/2017
0101-41920-62300
79397428
Alarm System Maintenance Contract
420.00
05/17/2017
0101-41930-62300
Check Total:
840.00
Vendor: SunLifeF
Sun Life Financial
Check Sequence: 52
ACH Enabled: False
238450
June 2017 Premium
31.92
05/17/2017
0101-42200-60330
238450
June 2017 Premium
1,491.47
05/17/2017
0101-00000-21205
238450
June 2017 Premium
153.69
05/17/2017
7100-00000-21218
238450
June 2017 Premium
778.47
05/17/2017
0101-00000-21216
238450
June 2017 Premium
182.23
05/17/2017
0101-00000-21217
Check Total:
2,637.78
Vendor: SupSolut
Supply Solutions LLC
Check Sequence: 53
ACH Enabled: False
13911
Roll Paper Towel
69.80
05/17/2017
0101-41920-61025
13919
Bath Tissue &Paper Towel
168.31
05/17/2017
0101-41930-61025
Check Total:
238.11
Vendor: Timesave
Timesaver
Check Sequence: 54
ACH Enabled: False
M22894
City Council Meeting
482.00
05/17/2017
0101-41100-63005
M22894
Park & Recreation Meeting
173.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63005
M22894
Open Space & City Council Meeting
207.00
05/17/2017
0101-41500-63005
Check Total:
862.00
Vendor: TmGreen
TruGreen
Check Sequence: 55
ACH Enabled: False
63141313
Weed Control
218.00
05/17/2017
5100-48100-63010
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/17/2017 - 3:06 PM) Page 8
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
63141313
Weed Control
196.00
05/17/2017
0101-41920-63010
63141313
Weed Control
40.00
Check Sequence: 56
05/17/2017
5100-48100-63010
63141313
Weed Control
33.00
05/17/2017
5200-48200-63010
63141313
Weed Control
33.00
US Bank Equipment Finance
05/17/2017
5200-48200-63010
63141313
Weed Control
36.00
148.30
05/17/2017
5100-48100-63010
63141313
Weed Control
185.00
05/17/2017
05/17/2017
5100-48100-63010
63141313
Weed Control
600.00
0101-41420-62200
05/17/2017
2130-44000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
85.00
05/17/2017
0101-41920-63010
63141313
Weed Control
204.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
114.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
85.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
93.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
130.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
70.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
125.00
05/17/2017
0101115000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
105.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
85.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
75.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
95.00
05/17/2017
0101-41920-63010
63141313
Weed Control
350.50
05/17/2017
0101-41910-63010
63141313
Weed Control
350.50
05/17/2017
0101111930-63010
63141313
Weed Control
110.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
126.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
209.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
160.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
170.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
233.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
95.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
80.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
110.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
63141313
Weed Control
60.00
05/17/2017
0101-45000-63010
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/17/2017 - 3:06 PK Page 9
Check Total:
4,661.00
Vendor: UnigDini
Unique Dining Experiences
Check Sequence: 56
6900
Annual Review 40 Yrs
500.00
05/17/2017
0101-42200-61015
Check Total:
500.00
Vendor: USBankEq
US Bank Equipment Finance
Check Sequence: 57
330497009
Ricoh Copier Lease - Comm Ctr
148.30
05/17/2017
2130-44000-62200
330497009
Ricoh Copier Lease - Bldg. Dept.
162.39
05/17/2017
0101-42300-62200
330497009
Ricoh Copier Lease - City Hall
258.39
05/17/2017
0101-41420-62200
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/17/2017 - 3:06 PK Page 9
Invoice No
Description
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number
330497009
Ricoh Copier Lease - FS 1
153.28
05/17/2017
0101-42200-62200
Check Total:
722.36
Vendor: Verizon
Verizon Wireless
Check Sequence: 58
9784949610
Monthly Charge -Storm Water Pump
25.02
05/17/2017
5300-48300-62030
9784949610
Monthly Charge -Park Trail Cams
50.04
05/17/2017
0101-45000-62030
9784949610
Purchase 2 - Trail Cams Equipment
839.98
05/17/2017
6200-48900-61020
Check Total:
915.04
Vendor: Ziegler
Ziegler, Inc.
Check Sequence: 59
E8643948
May 2017 Maintenance Contract
553.72
05/17/2017
5100-48100-62300
E8861341
05/17 Maint Contract for LS #1 & LS #4
742.95
05/17/2017
5200-48200-62300
E8888441
May 2017 Maintenance Contract
62.03
05/17/2017
5100-48100-62300
Check Total:
1,358.70
Total for Check Run:
126,504.62
Total of Number of Checks:
59
Reference
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/17/2017 - 3:06 PK Page 10
Accounts Payable
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
User: brendaf
Printed: 05/25/2017 - 3:28PM
Batch: 00422.05.2017
Invoice No
Description
Vendor: Aircon
Aircon Electric Corporation
11017-2017-1
Wire Furnace @ Fire Station #1
11024-2017-1
Wire Generator @ Shadow Brook Lift Station
0101-41920-63105
Check Total:
Vendor: AmTraffi
American Traffic Safety
90147040
2017 Membership Dues
Check Total:
Vendor: AnkCol3
Anoka Co License Center
ACH Enabled:
2017 Ford Explorer License & Registration
1,723.45
Check Total:
Vendor: AspenMil
Aspen Mills
197880
Uniform for Doug Arndt
Check Total:
Vendor: BanKoe
Ban-Koe Companies, Inc
95111
Annual Fire System Test
Check Sequence: 4
Check Total:
Vendor: BarrEngi
Barr Engineering Company
23021026.01-11
Wellhead Prot Plan Phase II
Check Total:
Vendor: Barracud
Barracuda Networks, Inc.
1699594
Email Security
4, , 6; AXDLb-OR!4j�
Amount
Payment Date
Acct Number Reference
ACH Enabled:
False
Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False
1,662.12
05/25/2017
0101-41920-63105
205.00
05/25/2017
5200-48200-63100
1,867.12
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/25/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 1
Check Sequence: 2
ACH Enabled:
False
79.00
05/25/2017
0101-43100-61320
79.00
Check Sequence: 3
ACH Enabled:
False
1,723.45
05/25/2017
4180-49300-65400
1,723.45
Check Sequence: 4
ACH Enabled:
False
96.45
05/25/2017
0101-42200-61305
96.45
Check Sequence: 5
ACH Enabled:
False
2,185.35
05/25/2017
2130-44000-62300
2,185.35
Check Sequence: 6
ACH Enabled:
False
4,629.03
05/25/2017
5100-48100-63005
4,629.03
Check Sequence: 7
ACH Enabled:
False
2,100.00
05/25/2017
0101-41420-62305
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/25/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 1
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/25/2017 - 3:28 PND Page 2
Check Total:
2,100.00
Vendor: Beacon
Beacon Athletics
Check Sequence: 8
ACH Enabled:
False
0474435 -IN
Sparkle/Base Set/Pitching Rubber
2,275.00
05/25/2017
0101-00000-24201
0474435 -IN
Sparkle/Base Set/Pitching Rubber
621.00
05/25/2017
0101-45000-61020
0475152 -IN
Economy Fence Cap
1,992.00
05/25/2017
0101-00000-24201
Check Total:
4,888.00
Vendor: Boyer2
Boyer Trucks Lauderdale
Check Sequence: 9
ACH Enabled:
False
101209
Labor to Repair Unit #205
2,052.40
05/25/2017
6100-48800-63135
101209
Parts to Repair Unit #205
5,733.65
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
Check Total:
7,786.05
Vendor: CentLand
Central Landscape Supply
Check Sequence: 10
ACH Enabled:
False
272534
Roundup Pro Dry Pack
220.70
05/25/2017
0101-43100-61020
Check Total:
220.70
Vendor: CenLink
CenturyLink
Check Sequence: 11
ACH Enabled:
False
763 754-6713
Subway @ Community Center
53.61
05/25/2017
2130-44100-62030
Check Total:
53.61
Vendor: C1assC
Class C Components Inc.
Check Sequence: 12
ACH Enabled:
False
225803
Garbage Bags& Toilet Bowl Cleaner
296.59
05/25/2017
0101-41970-61020
Check Total:
296.59
Vendor: CollinsS
Steve Collins
Check Sequence: 13
ACH Enabled:
False
Lem to Skate Coach
90.00
05/25/2017
2130-44300-63005
Check Total:
90.00
Vendor: Colonial
Colonial Life & Accident
Check Sequence: 14
ACH Enabled:
False
E7156706
June 2017 Premium - E7156706
9.60
05/25/2017
7100-00000-21218
E7156706
June 2017 Premium - E7156706
217.41
05/25/2017
0101-00000-21210
Check Total:
227.01
Vendor: ComFord
Cornerstone Ford
Check Sequence: 15
ACH Enabled:
False
16179737/1
Labor to Repair Unit #17-79
54.00
05/25/2017
6100-48800-63135
16179737/1
Parts to Repair Unit #17-79
85.16
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/25/2017 - 3:28 PND Page 2
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/25/2017 - 3:28 PM) page 3
Check Total:
139.16
Vendor:
Cues
CUES
Check Sequence: 16
ACH Enabled:
False
000622393
Camera Software
325.00
05/25/2017
5300-48300-61220
000622393
Camera Software
325.00
05/25/2017
5200-48200-61220
Check Total:
650.00
Vendor:
DehnOil
Dehn Oil Company
Check Sequence: 17
ACH Enabled:
False
53919
Unleaded Fuel
924.75
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61045
53920
Diesel Fuel
2,490.00
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61050
Check Total
3,414.75
Vendor:
ECM
ECM Publishers, Inc.
Check Sequence: 18
ACH Enabled:
False
489392
May - June 2017 Andover Newsletter
1,826.00
05/25/2017
0101-41210-63030
489950
Andover Advocate - May
129.00
05/25/2017
0101-46000-63025
Check Total:
1,955.00
Vendor:
EmerAum
Emergency Automotive
Check Sequence: 19
ACH Enabled:
False
D1,05 1717-21
Bulb for Unit #4819
22.41
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
Check Total:
22.41
Vendor:
FacMotor
Factory Motor Parts Company
Check Sequence: 20
ACH Enabled:
False
6-1473720
Lamps
7.08
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61020
Check Total:
7.08
Vendor:
Ferguson
Ferguson Waterworks #2516
Check Sequence: 21
ACH Enabled:
False
0237293
Meters
2,213,81
05/25/2017
5100-48100-61150
Check Total:
2,213.81
Vendor:
FirstStT
First State Tire Recycling
Check Sequence: 22
ACH Enabled:
False
105191
Tire Recycling
219.00
05/25/2017
0101-46000-63010
105205
Tire Recycling
531.00
05/25/2017
0101-46000-63010
Check Total:
750.00
Vendor:
FoxVallM
Fox Valley Metrology
Check Sequence: 23
ACH Enabled:
False
163619
Torque Wrench Calibration
345.00
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61205
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/25/2017 - 3:28 PM) page 3
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/25/2017 - 3:28 PK Page 4
Check Total:
345.00
Vendor:
GFOA
Gov't Finance Officers Ass
Check Sequence: 24
ACH Enabled:
False
2016 CAER Review
50.00
05/25/2017
2110-46500-63005
2016 CAER Review
50.00
05/25/2017
5100-48100-63005
2016 CAER Review
50.00
05/25/2017
5200-48200-63005
2016 CAER Review
35.00
05/25/2017
5300-48300-63005
2016 CAER Review
250.00
05/25/2017
010141400-63005
Check Total:
435.00
Vendor:
GovConn
GovConnection, Inc.
Check Sequence: 25
ACE Enabled:
False
54792573
Remote Backup Equipment
627.95
05/25/2017
0101-41420-61225
Check Total:
627.95
Vendor:
Hawkins2
Hawkins Inc
Check Sequence: 26
ACH Enabled:
False
4071416
Aqua Hawk MB-BioBlock
1,100.00
05/25/2017
5200-48200-61140
Check Total:
1,100.00
Vendor:
HowiesHo
Howies Hockey Tape
Check Sequence: 27
ACH Enabled:
False
28986
Resale Items for Pro Shop
283.59
05/25/2017
2130-44200-61245
Check Total:
283.59
Vendor:
IDEAL
Ideal Advertising, Inc
Check Sequence: 28
ACH Enabled:
False
42870
Polo Shirts
1,586.00
05/25/2017
0101-42200-61305
Check Total:
1,586.00
Vendor:
InstEnvi
Institute of Environmental Assessment
Check Sequence: 29
ACH Enabled:
False
00022395
Public Works Bldg - IAQ Monitoring
1,325.00
05/25/2017
0101-41930-63105
Check Total:
1,325.00
Vendor:
InterBat
Interstate All Battery Center
Check Sequence: 30
ACH Enabled:
False
1901202003080
12V Battery
21.99
05/25/2017
5200-48200-61005
Check Total:
21.99
Vendor:
JRAdvanc
Ms Advanced Recyclers
Check Sequence: 31
ACH Enabled:
False
92185
Appliances & Bulbs Recycling
316.00
05/25/2017
0101-46000-63010
92186
Appliances/Electronic & Bulbs Recycling
7,803.50
05/25/2017
0101-46000-63010
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/25/2017 - 3:28 PK Page 4
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Check Total
Vendor: KLMEngin KLM Engineering, Inc.
6356 Exterior Power Washing for Tower 2
8,119.50
Check Total:
Vendor:
LOCATO
Locators & Supplies, Inc.
0255933 -IN
Traffic Cones & Squeegee
318.42
Check Total:
Vendor:
MainMo
Main Motors Chev- Cadillac
325946
Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False
Parts for Unit 917-15
Check Sequence: 33
ACH Enabled:
Check Total:
Vendor:
Menards
Menards
45300
65.00
Andover Lions Pk Exerc Station
45843
5200-48200-61005
Mise. Supplies
45959
Misc. Supplies
Check Sequence: 34
ACH Enabled:
Check Total:
Vendor:
MNPlaygr
Minnesota Playground, Inc.
2017097
6100-48800-61115
Wood Fiber -200 CY
2017097
Shadowbrook East Park Playground
Check Total:
Vendor:
MTIDist
MTI Distributing Inc
1117247-00
Parts for Units #16-583 & #12-584
0101-45000-61020
Check Total:
Vendor:
NoAmSafe
North American Safety
27239
Safety Vest & Global Gove Gripster
27239
0101-43300-61105
Safety Vest & Global Gove Gripster
27239
254.78
Safety Vest & Global Gove Gripster
Check Total:
Vendor:
NoCounFo
North Country Ford
286297
False
Circuit for Unit #17-79
8,119.50
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/25/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 5
Check Sequence: 32
ACH Enabled:
False
9,875.00
05/25/2017
5100-48100-63100
318.42
9,875.00
Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False
65.00
Check Sequence: 33
ACH Enabled:
False
519.34
05/25/2017
0101-43300-61020
0101-43100-61020
65.00
519.34
05/25/2017
5200-48200-61005
282.00
Check Sequence: 34
ACH Enabled:
False
41.45
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
41.45
Check Sequence: 35
ACH Enabled:
False
31.16
05/25/2017
0101-45000-61020
31.73
05/25/2017
5100-48100-61105
191.89
05/25/2017
0101-43300-61105
254.78
Check Sequence: 36
ACH Enabled:
False
636.00
05/25/2017
O101 A5000-61130
2,544.00
05/25/2017
0101-45000-61130
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/25/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 5
Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: False
318.42
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
318.42
Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False
65.00
05/25/2017
0101-45000-61020
152.00
05/25/2017
0101-43100-61020
65.00
05/25/2017
5200-48200-61005
282.00
Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: False
28.03
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/25/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 5
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/25/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 6
Check Total:
28.03
Vendor: NorthMec
Northland Mechanical
Check Sequence: 40
ACH Enabled: False
69691-65385
Replace Control Board @ FS 41
555.00
05/25/2017
0101-41920-63105
69692-65090
Repair Pipe Leaking @ Fire Station #2
263.00
05/25/2017
0101-41920-63105
Check Total:
818.00
Vendor: OReiAuto
O'Reilly Auto Parts
Check Sequence: 41
ACH Enabled: False
3253-262654
Misc. Filters
4,149.38
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
3253-262954
Returned Fuel Filters
-6.58
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
3253-265133
Mini Lamp
4.13
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61020
3253-265284
HubBrg Assy
271.14
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
3253-265524
AC Compressor Packages
218.76
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61020
3253-265535
Mini Fuses
13.96
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61020
3253-265653
Return Deck Support
-20.81
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
3253-265674
Flasher for Unit#69
15.19
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
3253-265722
Returned Misc. Filters
-1,014.94
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
3253-265732
Flasher
15.19
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
3253-265739
Retuned Misc. Filters
-1,001.60
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
3253-265748
Returned Misc. Filters
-1,490.19
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
3253-266618
Oil & Fuel Filters
36.80
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
3253-266911
Capsule
6.98
05/25/2017
610048800-61020
Check Total:
1,197.41
Vendor: Of Depot
Office Depot
Check Sequence: 42
ACH Enabled: False
927122842001
CH Office Depot Supplies
3.02
05/25/2017
0101-42300-61005
927122842001
Office Supplies
3.49
05/25/2017
0101-41500-61005
927122842001
Copy Paper -11 X 17
261.60
05/25/2017
0101-41420-61005
927122842001
CH Office Depot Supplies
1.21
05/25/2017
0101-41400-61005
927122842001
Office Supplies
11.88
05/25/2017
0101-41230-61005
927122842001
CH Office Depot Supplies
2.42
05/25/2017
0101-41500-61005
927122842001
CH Office Depot Supplies
0.60
05/25/2017
010141300-61005
927122842001
CH Office Depot Supplies
1.81
05/25/2017
0101-41600-61005
927122842001
CH Office Depot Supplies
1.81
05/25/2017
010141200-61005
927122842001
CH Office Depot Supplies
1.21
05/25/2017
0101-41230-61005
Check Total:
289.05
Vendor: OxySvcCo
Oxygen Service Company
Check Sequence: 43
ACH Enabled: False
08071796
Misc. Supplies
225.00
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61020
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/25/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 6
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Check Total:
225.00
Vendor:
RIMechan
R7 Mechanical, Inc.
Check Sequence: 44
ACH Enabled:
False
6702
Replace Furnace & A/C @ FS #1
7,742.69
05/25/2017
0101-41920-63105
Check Total:
7,742.69
Vendor:
ROGERA
Roger's Auto Body
Check Sequence: 45
ACH Enabled:
False
Labor to Repair Unit #200
895.00
05/25/2017
6100-48800-63135
Parts to Repair Unit #200
865.00
05/25/2017
610048800-61115
Check Total:
1,760.00
Vendor:
RoyalTi
Royal Tire Inc
Check Sequence: 46
ACH Enabled:
False
301-135352
Tire for Unit #T-98
120.65
05/25/2017
6100-48800-61115
Check Total:
120.65
Vendor:
S&SInd
S & S Industrial Supply
Check Sequence: 47
ACH Enabled:
False
291989
Misc. Supplies for Signs
21.60
05/25/2017
0101-43300-61030
Check Total:
21.60
Vendor:
SigSyst
Signal Systems Inc.
Check Sequence: 48
ACH Enabled:
False
39480
Time Clock Set & Service
39.44
05/25/2017
0101-45000-61005
39480
Time Clock Set & Service
39.44
05/25/2017
0101-43100-61005
39480
Time Clock Set & Service
39.43
05/25/2017
610048800-61005
39480
Time Clock Set & Service
39.44
05/25/2017
5100-48100-61005
Check Total:
157.75
Vendor:
SmithBr
Smith Brothers Decorating
Check Sequence: 49
ACH Enabled:
False
24067
Paint
155.46
05/25/2017
0101-43100-61020
Check Total:
155.46
Vendor:
TruGreen
TruGmen
Check Sequence: 50
ACH Enabled:
False
Weed Control @ Pumphouse #3
88.00
05/25/2017
5100-48100-63010
Check Total:
88.00
Vendor:
TCGamge
Twin City Garage Door Co.
Check Sequence: 51
ACH Enabled:
False
482121
Repair Small Door on East Side
1,167.60
05/25/2017
5100-48100-63010
482660
Remove& Replace Bottom Weather Seal
629.25
05/25/2017
5100-48100-63105
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/25/2017 - 3:28 PM)
Page 7
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/25/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 8
Check Total:
1,796.85
Vendor: Uline
Uline
Check Sequence: 52
86837346
Trash Cans Andover Lions Park
728.20
05/25/2017
4150-49300-61020
86837346
Trash Cans Timber Trails Park
728.20
05/25/2017
4150-49300-61020
86837346
Trash Cans Maple View Park
364.10
05/25/2017
4150-49300-61020
86837346
Trash Cans Ranger 45 Gal
1,820.50
05/25/2017
0101-45000-61020
Check Total:
3,641.00
Vendor: USBankEq
US Bank Equipment Finance
Check Sequence: 53
331295048
Ricoh Copier Lease @ Public Works
140.50
05/25/2017
0101-41930-62200
Check Total:
140.50
Vendor: Verizon
Verizon Wireless
Check Sequence: 54
9785657233
Monthly Cell Phone Service
69.37
05/25/2017
0101-41200-62030
9785657233
Monthly Cell Phone Service
249.00
05/25/2017
0101-42300-62030
9785657233
Monthly Cell Phone Service
165.60
05/25/2017
2130-44000-62030
9785657233
Monthly Cell Phone Service
96.25
05/25/2017
0101-41500-62030
9785657233
Monthly Cell Phone Service
396.63
05/25/2017
0101-41600-62030
9785657233
Monthly Cell Phone Service
59.37
05/25/2017
0101-41400-62030
9785657233
Monthly Cell Phone Service
190.40
05/25/2017
0101-42200-62030
9785657233
Monthly Cell Phone Service
105.69
05/25/2017
0101-41420-62030
9785657233
Monthly Cell Phone Service
367.03
05/25/2017
0101-45000-62030
9785657233
Monthly Cell Phone Service
110.64
05/25/2017
5200-48200-62030
9785657233
Monthly Cell Phone Service
71.89
05/25/2017
0101-43300-62030
9785657233
Monthly Cell Phone Serviced
263.07
05/25/2017
0101-43100-62030
9785657233
Monthly Cell Phone Service
157.11
05/25/2017
6100-48800-62030
9785657233
Monthly Cell Phone Service
302.04
05/25/2017
5100-48100-62030
9785657233
Monthly Cell Phone Service
59.37
05/25/2017
0101-41910-62030
Check Total:
2,663.46
Total for Check Run:
84,555.04
Total of Number of Checks:
54
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
ACH Enabled: False
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (05/25/2017 - 3:28 PM) Page 8
Accounts Payable
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor 2
06/01/
User: f 4- � J
Printed: 06/01/2017 - 2:22PM
Batch: 00401.062017
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number
9 h CITY aF
N66R »
Reference
Vendor: WellsFar Wells Fargo Bank
Check Sequence: I ACH Enabled: False
Membership Dues
75.00
06/01/2017
0101-42200-61320
Tools
321.70
06/01/2017
6100-48800-61205
Parts for Units #07-191 & #4814
246.43
06/01/2017
6100-48800-61115
Meal
36.00
06/01/2017
6100-48800-61310
Vehicle License
30.74
06/01/2017
6100-48800-61415
Misc. Supplies
138.05
06/01/2017
0101-42200-61020
Postage
57.09
06/01/2017
5100-48100-61405
Misc. Supplies
294.00
06/01/2017
5300-48300-61145
Fuel
20.00
06/01/2017
6100-48800-61045
Parts for Unit#155
14.99
06/01/2017
6100-4880061115
Meals for Conference
90.19
06/01/2017
0101-42200-61310
Shuttle & Cab
69.23
06/01/2017
0101-42200-61410
Misc. Supplies
29.22
06/01/2017
0101-42200-61020
Tools
529.92
06/01/2017
0101-42200-61205
Misc. Supplies
555.66
06/01/2017
0101-45000-61020
Misc. Supplies
14.00
06/01/2017
5100-48100-61120
Misc. Supplies
51.75
06/01/2017
0101-41920-61120
Misc. Supplies
285.00
06/01/2017
4150-49300-61020
Fox Meadows Park Redevelopment
400.00
06/01/2017
4150-49300-63010
Tools
119.92
06/01/2017
0101-41600-61205
Subscription
295.03
06/01/2017
0101-43200-61325
Pop
31.76
06/01/2017
7100-00000-24208
Computer Upgrades
157.80
06/01/2017
0101-41420-61225
Technology Upgrades
429.98
06/01/2017
0101-42200-61225
Misc. Supplies
404.99
06/01/2017
0101-45000-61020
Misc. Supplies
59.59
06/01/2017
0101-42300-61020
Computer Equipment
555.96
06/01/2017
2130-44000-61210
All Staff Meeting
42.81
06/01/2017
0101-41200-61310
Council Meeting
110.87
06/01/2017
0101-41100-61310
Food for Recycling Day
14.99
06/01/2017
0101-46000-61310
Metro Safety Meeting
33.20
06/01/2017
0101-41600-61310
LTS Job Posting Ad
35.00
06/01/2017
2130-44000-63025
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2017 - 2:22 PM) Page 1
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Weatherseal for Garage Door
43.55
06/01/2017
2130-44300-61020
Schlage Everest Key Blanks
541.90
06/01/2017
213044400-61020
Fuel
21.00
06/01/2017
6100-48800-61045
Parts for Units #77 & #76
26.38
06/01/2017
6100-48800-61115
Check Total: 6,183.70
Total for Check Run: 6,183.70
Total of Nmnber of Checks:
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2017 - 2:22 PM) Page 2
Accounts Payable
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
User: brendaf
Printed: 06/01/2017- 3:17PM
Batch: 00406.06.2017
Invoice No Description
�1l��eiER�
Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor: AlliedBI
Allied Blacktop Co.
Check Sequence: 1
ACH Enabled:
False
Payment #1
2017 Parking Lot Maintenance
1,492.40
06/06/2017
4180-49300-63010
Payment#1
2017 Crack Sealing
89,422.51
06/06/2017
4140-49300-63010
Check Total:
90,914.91
Vendor: BjorkCom
Bjorklund Companies LLC
Check Sequence: 2
ACH Enabled:
False
25747
Class 1 Gravel
16,242.54
06/06/2017
4140-49300-63010
Check Total:
16,242.54
Vendor: EnviTech
Envirotech Services, Inc.
Check Sequence:3
ACH Enabled;
False
CD201713271
Calcium Chloride
8,205.12
06/06/2017
0101-43100-63010
CD201713271
Calcium Chloride
1,922.58
06/06/2017
0101-45000-63010
CD201713271
Calcium Chloride
726.66
06/062017
0101-43100-63010
Check Total:
10,854.36
Vendor: HDSuppW,
HD Supply Waterworks, LTD.
Check Sequence: 4
ACH Enabled:
False
H170451
Water Meters
22,500.00
06/06/2017
5100-48100-61035
Check Total:
22,500.00
Vendor: MattBull
Matt Bullock Contracting Co.
Check Sequence: 5
ACH Enabled:
False
Payment #1
Fox Meadows Park Redevelopment
67,436.03
06/062017
4150-49300-63010
Check Total:
67,436.03
Vendor: MNDOH
Minnesota Department of Health
Check Sequence: 6
ACH Enabled:
False
1020034
20172nd Qtr Water Connection Fee
10,460.00
06/06/2017
5100-48100-63050
Check Total:
10,460.00
Vendor: NelsAuto
Nelson Auto Center
Check Sequence: 7
ACH Enabled:
False
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2017 - 3:17 PK Page I
Invoice No Description
F7638
2017 Ford Explorer
F7638
2017 Ford Explorer
06/06/2017
Check Total:
Vendor: No Valley
North Valley, Inc.
Payment #1
2017 Street Reconstruction
Check Total:
Vendor: RedpathC
Redpath and Company
150432929
2016 Audit
150432929
2016 Audit
150432929
2016 Audit
150432929
2016 Audit
150432929
2016 Audit
150432929
2016 Audit
2220-41600-63005
Check Total:
Vendor: YMCAAn<
YMCA of Metro Mpls - Andover
33,945.00
Youth Center 09/2016 - 04/2017
Check Total
Total for Check Run:
Total of Number of Checks:
Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
12,869.20 06/06/2017 5100-48100-65400
12,869.19 06/06/2017 5200.18200-65400
25,738.39
593,360.32
10
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2017 - 3:17 PM) Page 2
Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: False
299,651.09
06/06/2017
4140-49300-63010
299,651.09
Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False
5,383.00
06/06/2017
5100-48100-63005
5,383.00
06/06/2017
5200-48200-63005
1,625.00
06/06/2017
5300-48300-63005
1,644.00
06/062017
2110-46500-63005
711.00
06/062017
2220-41600-63005
19,199.00
06/062017
0101-41400-63005
33,945.00
Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False
15,618.00
06/06/2017
2320-41400-63005
593,360.32
10
AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2017 - 3:17 PM) Page 2
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: Jim Dickinson, City
FROM: David D. Berkowitz, Director
Works/City Engineer
0
SUBJECT: Accept Petition/Order Feasibility Report/17-38/2462 —138`h Ave. NW/WM -
Engineering
DATE: June 6, 2017
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is requested to accept the petition and order the feasibility report for Project
17-38, 2462 — 138th Avenue NW for water main improvements.
In 2010 water main was installed on 1381h Avenue NW and Xavis Street NW from Crosstown
Drive NW to Bunker Lake Boulevard NW. The lateral water main and services to each unit was
funded through Community Development Block Grant funding to encourage municipal water
connection in this area.
Attached is the petition from the property owner to hook up to City municipal water. As
identified on the petition letter the property owner has waived the right to a public hearing. The
next step is to prepare the feasibility report with the associated costs and bring back to the City
Council for approval.
BUDGETIMPACT
All fees associated with this project will be assessed to the property.
ACTION REOUIRED
The City Council is requested to accept the petition and order the feasibility report for Project 17-
38, 2462 — 138th Avenue NW for water main improvements.
Respectfully submitted,
David D. Berkowitz
Attachments: Resolution Location Map & Petitioner
cc: Gary Haider, 3033 —127th Ln. NW, Coon Rapids, MN 55448
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING
FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS FOR PROJECT
NO. 17-38 , IN THE AREA OF 2462 —138"' AVENUE NW.
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition, dated May 24, 2017
requesting the construction of improvements; and
WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to represent the signatures of
100% of the affected property owners requesting such improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover that:
The petition is hereby declared to be 100% of owners of property affected,
thereby making the petition unanimous.
Escrow amount for feasibility report is 0
The proposed improvement is hereby referred to the City Engineer and he is
instructed to provide the City Council with a feasibility report.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting this 6th day of June , 2017, with
Councilmembers
favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Julie Trude - Mayor
Michelle Hartner — Deputy City Clerk
voting in
voting
AK, 6 R 138th Ave. NW (Water Hook Up)
Date Created: June 01, 2017
Disclaimer: The provider makes no representation or warranties with respect to the reuse of this data.
Date: May 24, 2017
Andover City Engineer
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, MN 55304
Re: Municipal Improvements
Dear City Engineer:
17- 3$
RECEIVED
14AY30M17
CITY OF ANDOVER
We do hereby petition for improvements of atermam sanitary sewer, storm
sewer and streets (circle one or more) with the cos s of the improvement to be
assessed against my benefiting property.
Said petition is unanimous and the public hearing may be waived. We would like
to be assessed over a 5 year period.
Sincerely,
GaWHaider
2462 138 Ave NW, Andover, MN (Property Address)
3033 127th Lane NW, Coon Rapids, MN 55448 (Home Address)
612-810-3625
C:\Users\garyhaider\Documents\PETITION SINGLE.doc
NDOVE
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Councilmembers
James Dickinson City Administrat(
Dana Makinen, Human Resources
Accept Resignation of Darrin Hansen, Streets Maintenance Worker
June 6, 2017
CG
INTRODUCTION
This item is to acknowledge the resignation of Darrin Hansen, Streets Maintenance Worker.
DISCUSSION
Darrin's last day with the City of Andover will be Jun 8, 2017.
The Human Resources department would like to advertise and recruit candidates for this position.
BUDGETIMPACT
None. This was already identified in the 2017 Budget.
ACTION REQUESTED
The City Council is requested to acknowledge the resignation of Darrin Hansen and authorize
Human Resources to begin recruitment for a new Streets Maintenance Worker.
Respectfully submitted,
Dana Makinen
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.ANDOVERMN.GI}V
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
David D. Berkowitz, Director of ublic orks/City Engineer
FROM: Todd J. Haas, Assistant Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Consider Request to Waive Tournament Fee for The Heroes Tourney -Tribute to NIN
Troops — Engineering
DATE: June 6, 2015
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is requested to approve a request to waive the tournament application fees for the use of Sunshine
Park ball fields on August 12, 2017 by the Tribute to the Troops of Minnesota.
Attached is the tournament application. This is the first year the tournament organization is putting on a tournament
of this type.
The fee that is being recommended to be waived is as follows:
$206.25 Field reservation fee (1 day only).
$200.00 Field usage fee.
Note: Staff is not recommending the $250 damage deposit fee be waived since all non-profit organizations (youth
associations such as baseball, softball, soccer, football, etc.) have been required to provide a deposit each year. The
damage deposit fee is refundable as long as the litter/garbage on the fields, parking areas and other portions of the
park have been cleaned up and that there has been no damage to the fields/facilities.
Note: The City Council has the only authority to waive fees. Fees have been waived in the past (20 15) for the North
Metro Firefighters Mutual Aid Department which is considered non-profit organization.
The tournament application was approved by the Park and Recreation Commission on March 20, 2017.
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to approve a request to waive the tournament application fees for the use of Sunshine
Park ball fields on August 12, 2017 by the Tribute to the Troops of Minnesota.
Respectfully submitted,
Todd J. Haas
Cc: Kyle Lundequam, Tournament Director (copy sent by e-mail)
Attachment: Request from The Heroes Tourney Directors; Tournament application
A
Arm'
rr0000M
TRCRCROCSTOURRCT
The Heroes Tourney
P.O. Box 120
Andover, MN 55304
www.TheHeroesTourney.org
22 -May -2017
To the Andover City Council,
Subject: Request for Waiver of Fees for The Heroes Tourney
The Heroes Tourney, an all -volunteer committee of Tribute To The Troops — Minnesota
(https://tributetothetroops.orgo, was created to utilize athletic tournaments to deliver
educational support to children of fallen heroes. Our inaugural event will be a co-ed
Softball Tournament including a double -elimination tournament, home run derby, base
running competition, and kids event. Proceeds from this eventwill go to the Fallen Heroes'
Children's Education Fund (https://tributetothetroops.org/childrens-education-fun4.php)
which provides financial assistance to the surviving children of our fallen heroes for post-
secondary education costs.
Since this charity tournament's main goal is to raise funds for children's education, we
would like to request a waiver to the City's fees for this event. The requested waiver would
be for $456.25 (406.25 in field fees plus $50 for the Cushman) and does not include the
damage deposits.
We look forward to answering any questions you may have at your June 6th meeting.
Sincerely,
Kyle Lundequam and Scott Lundequam
The Heroes Tourney Tournament Directors
Tribute To The Troops — Minnesota
ECEIVE
MAY 2 3 2017
BY:
2017 TOURNAMENT, MULTI -DAY AND JAMBOREE APPLICATION FORM
(SOFTBALL, BASEBALL 8, FAST PITCH)
(Please print or type all information) ECCE VEE
NAME OF TOURNAMENT: The Heroes Tourney - 1st Annual Softball Tournament FEB Z 2 2017
TOURNAMENT ORGANIZATION: _ The Hp.mpq Tnnrnev o -r+=11
TOURNAMENT SPONSOR:. Tribute To The Troops — Minnesota
TWO TOURNAMENT DIRECTORS MUST BE LISTED
TOURNAMENT DIRECTOR #1
(print name): _ Kyle Lundeguam
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 120
CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: Andover, MN 55304
PHONE: 763-439-5980
(mobile)
E-MAIL: kVle(@tributetothetrool)s.org
TOURNAMENT DIRECTOR #2
(print name):
Scoff Lundeguam
ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 120
CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: Andover, MN 55304
PHONE:
763-670-4908
(mobile)
E-MAIL: _
slundeguam(c)gmail com
Note: The Tournament Director(s) or designee shall be on site at all times during the duration of the tournament.
Check here if organization is located in Andover X
DATES OF'TOURNAMENT: 12 Aucli ist 2017
PARK FEES AND USAGE.
Fees are as follows: (Check A or B)
X A. No Field Maintenance
X Adult - $275.00 Field reservation fee is for the use of up to 2 fields (')
0 Youth - $275.00 Field reservation fee is for the use of up to 2 fields (") for all youth organizations not affiliated with
Andover youth (to be considered an organization from Andover, a minimum of 51% participation of Andover
residents shall be required based on the previous year participation of the organization or association).
Note: (') This field reservation fee is used to secure the use of the field(s). If your organization schedules more
than 2 fields an additional $100 per field will be charged. If your organization uses more than the approved
number of field(s), the organization will be charged double per field plus a 15% administration fee.
4 Number of fields to be used
Note: 1 day tournaments will be charged 75% of the field reservation fee.
The field reservation fee includes the use of the chalker, chalk and batter's box during the duration of the
tournament by the Tournament Director.
The Tournament Directors is responsible for maintenance of the field(s), upkeep of trash bins, restrooms and
building.
0 B. With Field Maintenance
0 Adult - $275.00 Field reservation fee is for the use of up to 2 fields (") plus a $1000 escrow for maintenance. Note:
Any remaining escrow will be returned to the applicant once the final City maintenance personnel costs have been
determined. If it has been determined that the fees collected are not enough to cover the City maintenance
personnel costs of the tournament, the applicant will be responsible to pay for these costs prior to the release of
any damage deposit fee that has been collected for the tournament.
0 Youth - $275.00 Field reservation fee is for the use of up to 2 fields for all youth organizations not affiliated with
Andover youth (') (to be considered an organization from Andover, a minimum of 51 % participation of Andover
residents shall be required based on the previous year participation of the organization or association). A $800
escrow shall be required for maintenance for all organizations and/or associations. Note: Any remaining escrow
will be returned to the applicant once the final City maintenance personnel costs have been determined. If it has
been determined that the fees collected are not enough to cover the City maintenance personnel costs of the
tournament, the applicant will be responsible to pay for these costs prior to the release of any damage deposit fee
that has been collected for the tournament. For organizations affiliated with Andover Youth, the field reservation
fee will be waived but the escrow is required.
Note: (') This Field reservation fee is used to secure the use of the field(s) and to pay for a City employee to
maintain the facilities throughout the tournament (upkeep of trash bins, restrooms and building) including
the maintenance of fields. If your organization schedules more than 2 fields, an additional $100 per field
will be charged. If your organization uses more than the approved number of field(s), the organization will
be charged double per field plus a 15% administration fee.
Number of fields to be used
Note: 1 day tournaments will be charged 75% of the field reservation fee.
The field reservation fee includes the use of the chalker, chalk and batter's box during the duration of the
tournament by the Tournament Director.
Damage Deposit Fees (Check A or B)
0 A. $500 Profit Organizations
X B. $250 Non -Profit Organizations
Park usage as follows: (Check fields requested to be used)
Softball Fields
0 Eveland Fields -North Field
0 Eveland Fields -Middle Field
0 Eveland Fields -South Field
X Sunshine Park -Diamond No. 1
X Sunshine Park -Diamond No. 2
X Sunshine Park -Diamond No. 3
X Sunshine Park -Diamond No. 4
0 Sunshine Park -Diamond No. 5
0 Sunshine Park -Diamond No. 6
0 City Hall Park Complex #1 -Diamond No. 7
Baseball Fields
0 Andover Station N. Ball Field Facility -West Field
If Andover Station N. Ball Field Facility -Middle Field
0 Andover Station N. Ball Field Facility -East Field
0 Hidden Creek North Park
0 Pine Hills South Park
0 Shadowbrook East Park -South Field
0 Shadowbrook East Park -North Field
0 Rose Park -South Field
0 Rose Park -North Field
SPECIAL REQUEST SECTION Check the following boxes if applicable.
X If you need to use the Cushman, there will be a fee of $50.00 per day and $350 refundable damage deposit. It will be
necessary to pay the necessary fees 1 week prior to the tournament. Training for the Cushman by the Public Works
Department will be necessary prior to any use.
0 List any special instructions necessary for the Public Works Department so arrangements can be made prior to the
tournament. (Example: Include the location/distance of pitching rubbers and/or base locations.)
All requests for tournaments must be submitted by Friday, January 6, 2017. The application. will be considered by the Park
& Recreation Commission at the third Thursday meeting in January. Any tournament application after that will be on a space
available basis. and must be submitted at least eight weeks prior to the tournament date. A penalty of 50 percent of the field
reservation fee will be assessed for applications made less than eight weeks prior to the tournament date. All fees (including
escrows if maintenance is being requested) must be submitted with the application no later than eight weeks prior to the
tournament date. For any late application, the late fees (including escrows if maintenance is being requested) must also be'
submitted with the application, including the penalty fee. Late applications must be approved by the Park and Recreation
Commission at least two weeks prior to the date of the tournament. The sequencing of scheduling will be considered with City .
Youth Associations having first priority.
A $500.00 damage deposit fee (or $250.00 deposit fee for non-profit organizations) is due eight weeks before the tournament
date. Any equipment damaged or lost or any damage to City property by renter will be deducted from deposit fee. The $500.00
(or the $250.00), less any money for damages, will be returned after inspection and final City maintenance personnel costs of the
tournament have been determined by the Public Works Department.
. If the tournament organization is requesting a Non -Intoxicating Liquor License, it will be necessary to request Attachment A.
The City Council has adopted the following policy:
"Field reservation fees and the required escrow for tournaments shall be paid no later than eight weeks prior to the
tournament date. If the tournament is cancelled, the field reservation fee nor the Non -Intoxicating Liquor License Fee will be
returned. In the event that another sponsor requests the use of the facilities after a tournament has been cancelled, the hew
sponsor must pay the full amount and the original sponsor will be refunded the total minus any administrative costs incurred
by the City. Where tournament reservation fees are not required and a tournament is cancelled, the association or group is to
notify the City in writing at least 14 days prior to the date of the tournament".
If further information is needed, please contact the Parks Coordinator at (763) 755-5100. Application forms may. be obtained
from and returned to the City of Andover, Parks Coordinator, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, MN 55304.
• The City reserves the right to cancel or delay usage of the fields due to weather, field conditions, etc.
• During the months of May & June, no more than three consecutive weekend tournaments in a row will be allowed.
• Regulations, Violations and Penalties Regarding (City Code Title 8 Chapter 4) use and occupancy of city parks are available
on the City of Andover's webpage at www.andovermn.cov
NO METAL SPIKES (UNLESS APPROVED BY THE CITY).
. NO ALCOHOL
19 Feb 2017
DATE
20 Feb 2017
DATE
Approved by City Council: 2/3/15
H/engineering/parks/application/softbal Itourn ame ntappl.doc
KYLE LUNDEQUAM
TOURNAMENT DIRECTOR #1 (signature) .
2/20/2017
XScott Lundequam
Slpned by. LUNDEQUAM.SCO'R.PAUL1392086362
TOURNAMENT DIRECTOR #2 (signature)
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.AN DOVE RMN. GOV
TO
CC
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Councilmember's
Nts
James Dickinson, City AdministratJoe Janish, Community Developmeor
Stephanie Hanson, City Planner
Approve Final Plat - Catcher's Creek 2"d Addition — Mark Smith — Planning
June 6, 2017
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is asked to approve the final plat for Catcher's Creek 2nd Addition.
DISCUSSION
The proposed final plat creates 28 single family lots. There are minor revisions that will need to
be corrected prior to the release of the Mylar's for recording at Anoka County.
Sheet 1: 144th Ave NE must be changed to 144th Ave NW
Sheet 2: Lot widths must comply with the approved preliminary plat — Block 2, Lot 9, 10, and 17
must be corrected
Park Dedication and Trail Fees
The developer will be required to pay park dedication and trail fees for the lots at the time
building permits are issued.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is asked to adopt the attached resolution approving the final plat with conditions.
Attachments
Resolution
Location map
Trails and Vehicle Maintenance Access Locations
Final Plat with Highlighted Corrections
Re ectfull ub 'tt d,
Stephanie L. Hanson
Cc: Mark Smith, 2170 Otter Lake Drive, Lino Lakes, MN 55110
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO RXX
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF "CATCHER'S CREEK 2"d
ADDITION" FOR PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS;
That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota,
lying South of the North 1150.15 feet as measured at right angles to the North line thereof; lying West
of the East 200.00 feet as measured at right angles to the East line thereof, lying East of the East line of
Prairie Road and lying North of the following described line: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said
Southwest Quarter, thence South 0 degrees 03 minutes 42 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the
East line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 1760 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be
herein described; thence North 82 degrees 00 minutes West 402.98 feet; thence North 82 degrees 59
minutes 02 seconds West 315.05 feet; thence North 86 degrees 28 minutes 27 seconds West 187.57
feet to the East line of Prairie Road and there terminate.
And:
The South 300.15 feet of the North 1150.15 feet, as measured at right angles to the North line, of that
part of the Southwest Quarter lying East of the East line of Prairie Road (as located on 5/22/69).
Also that part of the East 200.00 feet, as measured at right angles to the East line, of that part of the
Southwest Quarter lying South of the North 1150.15 feet as measured at right angles to the North line
thereof and lying North of the following described line: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said
Southwest Quarter; thence South 0 degrees 03 minutes 42 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the
East line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 1760.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be
herein described; thence North 82 degrees 00 minutes West 402.98 feet and there terminate. All in
Section 25, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota.
And:
Outlot A, Outlot B and Outlot C, CATCHERS CREEK, Anoka County, Minnesota
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the preliminary plat for the project to be known as "Catcher's
Creek 2"d Addition"; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has presented a final plat of Catcher's Creek 2"d Addition and it is consistent
with the approved preliminary plat.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby approve
the final plat of Catcher's Creek 2"d Addition contingent upon the following:
1. The plat shall conform to the final plat stamped received by the City of Andover June 6, 2017.
2. Separate Vehicle Maintenance Access Agreements shall be provided over, under, and across the
following lots: Block 2, between Lots 9 and 10; Block 2, Lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 which must be
approved by the City Attorney and recorded at the County with the final plat.
3. Separate Trail Easement Agreements shall be provided over, under, and across the southerly 100
feet of Block 2 Lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 which must be approved by the City Attorney and
recorded at the County with the final plat.
4. Separate Trail Easement Agreements shall be provided over, under, and across Block 2, between
Lots 5, 6, and 7 and Block 2, between Lots 19 and 20 which must be approved by the City
Attorney and recorded at the County with the final plat.
5. Park dedication and trail fees shall be paid on a per unit basis at the rate in effect at the time of
final plat approval and subject to increase as provided by state statute. Payment shall be made to
the city as per the Assessment Agreement.
6. A Development Contract and Assessment Agreement shall be executed prior to the filing of the
final plat.
7. Contingent upon staff review and approval for compliance with City ordinances, policies and
guidelines.
8. Corrections must be made to the final plat prior to the release of the Mylar's for recording with
Anoka County. Corrects include: Correct street name on Sheet 1 from 144th Ave NE to 144th Ave
NW; Sheet 2 Block 2, Lots 9, 10, and 17 lot widths must be in compliance with the approved
preliminary plat.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 6th day of June, 2017.
ATTEST:
CITY OF ANDOVER
Michelle Harmer, City Clerk Julie Trude, Mayor
LOCATION MAP
Catcher's Creek 2nd Add.
t I t 669. 395 igg63 19464 14465
i.
1,
�� � 19471f
,
r,-!4I� �/�
��-
11
�
311
❑111 ' i1' '
t'u u1 '•
'
1,
�� � 19471f
,
r,-!4I� �/�
��-
�
311
❑111 ' i1' '
t'u u1 '•
'
-
'
Ifip
IIP❑
f
�
IJS-b
.LA.SbA
I I in
113110
l 1&10
Ii -16
1111. �tl i
•M
V
b
X28
���
��
112-1-
t�
il❑
�•'
:�-131i
1 S11
311
2
219
.L
+t 14191
��'CL
�-
�
14
_.y to 1�
..
1
Map is meant to provide approximate location only
CRNRR" CONSTRUCTION Nares:
CATCHERS CREEi
2ND ADDITION
City o/ Andover
Anoka County, Minnesota
LEGEND:
IOY mOFAhY RIINo
—m—II—
C�IN4 NN1.K� NYFII
Lm�Ne umN.w
— —
Dmw siWl SRA
DHIM
�--
Ivrs
wtivtn swwrc arm
—1—
PP(PoFD MllYllll
—f<—
PXCYSD SIGN Sql
..", U d E
W Trail Easements
w VMA's
L•
`J s
CATCHERS CREEK 2ND ADDINON
.AT...,.-,... .. ,.-.L .
E. Me o/ the SW 1/4 of
Sen 25, T. 32, R. 24
Drainage and Utility Eaesmanfa are lesro -- J0.00
Wherein Nue: +:,: l C -' Itl 48 -__2 i --(
e 1'+Dreinage and
5s as BBB I*S Utnfly Easement l_ 30
I o as
. ar 1r,'7 1 led
Ice I8'
_JI L__ I__ 'sg 1 0
Being 5 feet In width and adpinlhq S r-- 184• - -1 I�
lot Mss, unless adversities shown,
and 10 feet In aldth and adpining 8 m
street Innes unless otheralee shown
on the plat $) /."4 ,Z 19
V0n
For the purposes of this / plat. the East 8 /• Af u, F
Tor of the Range
1/4 of Solon 25, Y / SOOR2'S4'E N 4;
Toanahlp 32, Rana 24 le assumed to
bear W07451 -W. LEI Or----
W 185.40----1 ig
e Denotes 1/2 Inch by 14 Inch Iron pipe
51- S �I�1
monument found and marked as Mom. SI V NI �} 1
O Denotes 1/2 Inch by 14 Inch. pipe w 1 's 0.1 x $
monument set and marked by Ucenee
Number 418175. e+i-----------
PV
as Or-Y---SOOR2'54"E----e 'A
a� 4
•i..4r.nw� u91 / ----��
• §gH 1L ---- 214.23
'bd
------j
NORTH .� a � ---50022'S4'E -�\
11 IIIN.I�CH�= 5�0 FEET
h-1
0 50 100 251.24 NOR2'S4"W
SCALE IN FEET L -
r-w.rn-1
As n -I ------7I r----1
I II
I
II
IW I
IW
'
IW 21
I„ NI
I II
IN pI
Ir ad
7 -I
II
I«
Ir
I� 6
- _ - -
I II
I
L ----J
80.01
II
I
-J
* - nit
L---
ste4 71
5 R JUNIPER STREET N.W. I
R
JUNIPER
STREET N.W., 2
„0OR S00^3fi_39'W
84.3/ NDRS'12'W 130.48 N014'44"E
$id, n .-_ 11Lt5 •�t
As n -I ------7I r----1
81.71
81.43 50.00
'
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Iz9It I
m
I�
i
This instrument was acknowledged before me His day of 20_ by as
aN 13
::" la
�1L7
I
��o° I'n
gllla
eI
g
of Ice g gI M
19
44 I
s
Ndary Public, County, Minnesota
In
' 8
31 gl I
_I
rn N Icah__
'I Ii
-I z
o
so M ME
I I
=% III
represeMatlm of the boundary survey; 01st ell mathemalkal data end labels ere corzectty designated on this plat that all monuments depicted on this post have been, of be mneclly ed fluin one yea,
I IIi 2 1 1
II II
-I
I�
o \
I I �
I_1)6.70__ Lj
67.70-J
I I S I h ^.
u? 81. L i ea.9D -J'
pr 70. 63.91 co
N0014'44'E o
A
PRAIRIE ROAD N. W. 8.
N�
-------
290.93 S0014'44'W
--------- -
m
Enc B. Lindgren, Licensed Lam Surveyor
y 's
N N
ec
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
PRAIRIE ROAD N.W.
as
- - - -
This instrument was aclud w edged before me this day of 20_ by Bic B. lintlpren.
Igoo
I
L- - -
-
- - - - - -
- - --
City of Andover
County of Anoka
Sec. 25, T. 32, R. 24
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Mark of Excellerwe Homes. Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Avner of Ne following described property:
The South 300.15 feet of the North 11M 15 feet, as measured at right angles to Ne North line. of Nat part of Ne Soutbeee Quarter tying East of the East One of Pnone Road (as located on
Sr2969). Also that pad of the East ZW.00 fee, as measured at night angles to the East line, of that pad of Me Southwest Quarter lying South of the Nodh 11W 15 feet as measured at right angles
to the North line thereof and tying North of the forts,rng desmbe l line: Commencing at the Northeast comer of said Southwest Coiner; thence South 0 degrees 03 rXntdes 42 seamnds East,
assumed beann8. along Ne East line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 1761 fact to the point of beginning of the Me to be herein deembed; thence North 82 degrees 00 mnotes West
402.98 feet and there terminate, Alt In Season 25, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota.
The pad of the Southwest Quarter of Season 25, Toem esp 32. Range 24, Am" County. Minnesota, lying South of the North 11 W.15 feet as measured at right angles to the Neth line thereof,
tying West of Ne East 200.00 feet as measured at right angles to Ne East line thereof, lying East of the East line of Preine Road and lying North of the farrowing desmbed line. commencing at the
Northeast comer of said Southwest Owner, thence South 0 degrees 03 minutes 42 sencends East, assumed beating. along the East line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 1760 feet to the
Wm of beginning of IM1e line to b herein asserted; teQ then Nash 82 degrees oa minutes West 402.98 feet; thence North 82 degrees 59 minutes 02 seconds West 315.05 feet; thence Nash 86
degrees 28 minutes 27 mi ands West 187.57 feet to the East I'me of Fraud. Read and there terminale.
Oullat A, Outlet B and Outlot C, CATCHERS CREEK, Anoka County, Mlnnesota.
Has caused the same to be surveyed and planed as CATCHERS CREEK 2ND ADDITION and does hereby author. to the public for public use the public ways and the drainage and uslity easements as
cheated by this plat.
In witness whereof said Mat, of Excellence Homes, Inc, a Minw¢ola corporatim, has caused these presents to to signed by its proper officer the day of 20_
MARK OF EXCELLENCE HOMES, INC
SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS
its
'
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
i
This instrument was acknowledged before me His day of 20_ by as
of Mary of Excellence Hanes. Inc., a Minnesota corporator, on behalf of the coryoragan.
♦i
rt
Ndary Public, County, Minnesota
' 8
My Commission Expire
CI
Eric B. Lindgren do hereby certdy that Nis plat was prepared by me or under my diced supervision. that I am a duty Licensed Land Surveyor In the State of Minnesota: that This plat is a coned
J `o
represeMatlm of the boundary survey; 01st ell mathemalkal data end labels ere corzectty designated on this plat that all monuments depicted on this post have been, of be mneclly ed fluin one yea,
that all water bourManes and wetosnce, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of Nis owmnwte are sMan am labeled on This plat. am all public ways are sham and
U U
labeled on this plat.
L
Q 8
(Clad his day of 20_
N
Enc B. Lindgren, Licensed Lam Surveyor
y 's
Minnesota License No. 98178
ec
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
This instrument was aclud w edged before me this day of 20_ by Bic B. lintlpren.
Igoo
I
Nw
i
Meaty Public County, Minnesota
3i; sj
My Commission Expire
't
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF ANDOVER MINNESOTA
%
This plat of CATCHERS CREEK 2ND ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of MWWr, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of
20_ and said plat is in owdaianoe with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 595.03, SuM 2.
�(
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
By: ,Mayor By: ,Clerk
II
MOM COUNTY SURVEYOR
1 hereby certify that and accordance argon Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Sued. 11, this plat has been rewewetl am approved this day IN 20-
BY
tarry D. Holum
me" County Surveyor
ANOKA COUNTY AUDITORRREASURER
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Search 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable In the year 20_ on the land heremefore described have been and, Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Seared 272.12,
there are no demuenl taxes and tmnsfererdemd this day of 20_
BY Deputy
Property lax Administrator
ANOKA COUNTY RECORDEWREGISTRAR OF TITLES
I hereby partly that Oda plat of CATCHERS CREEK 2ND ADDITION was riled In the office of Ne County RecorderlRegistar of TRIM for yubsc record on this day of
.20 al o'doc M. antl was duly remarried In Back Page_, as Document Number
By Deputy
Canty Recomenitegislrar of Tries
SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS
PRAIRIE f
ROAD
N.W.-----�
I . ,
:'� I ( 73221 SEB'45'ib"E
w) �)
83
t 9.23
Ai
R=949.73
N89'
120
I
I
I 2
/ a
:C
_W
4Q� S
Q
CATCHERS CREEK2NO ADDMON
'27
r
56.80
N.W.
ry
Z
ii
500514
5w 2.604
it
i p=51722'
I
II
1�I
13
I
II
•, /
27.09"
lig. zr
i �°+a,,1�.
23'211N/4and�4
\ = I
'I I$ I
a±
`• :_
t1 z
I
L--io22a —�
8�
I'
m Emm
U891y
I
/ham.
g
Mi eaM-
�i
I1
7
Jf1
8
her
11
ii
iil�
I W
r
I
/ 60 I
89' -35'09W ---1
M-
A
n' I
17 1-5
.00
R=20R=20.00
/
III
I
.✓,•' • •
---124T4-
>ewt6'te2
Courtly Ditch
No. 57 Coon
—Match Line
(See Shade 2 of 2 9ieeb)
S. line of the N. 1150.15 ft, of the��
-SW 1/4 of See. 25, T. 32 R. 24
589'45'16'EI Ai
y
00
50. j
II I'1
'Ias F-
41.92 ?��✓ to 44-11,00 it I � R WET
I I and LAND t
I Ig 9 1 81'; 10 I /1
I I, lira r I j
I I r n°
4eP4Stet1
_
A
56.80
N.W.
n
ii
I
it
i p=51722'
I
II
1�I
13
I
II
I1g
I -
II
C
�I Ib I
\ = I
- '
Edge of
N. W. mNN
N.W.
n
1 g _
,
___ _ 4=3509'42"
With, I.and
_
r --R=20.00
I I A -9P4]'45' �
/
I I 31.69is
80
�.......�..
Iiid
C
�I Ib I
\ = I
'I I$ I
a±
`• :_
t1 z
I
L--io22a —�
8�
and\
U891y
I
%
g
\
Emement
an
W d
t �
her
184.88
— ----
N F S
_ eI
11 o
I W
r
I
/ 60 I
89' -35'09W ---1
M-
A
n' I
17 1-5
.00
R=20R=20.00
,1
wY
\`
S81'48'34 -E
floe_-
_ 1t.
>29.1 4 26.1 frA
1.37 N8B'37'08'E .—.
.�
m� 143RD
nv1 $AYE.
N. W. mNN
N.W.
n
1 g _
,
___ _ 4=3509'42"
83.95_
_
r --R=20.00
I I A -9P4]'45' �
11.581
I I 31.69is
80
2 14
�I Ib I
\ = I
'I I$ I
a±
`• :_
t1 z
I
L--io22a —�
n w y l
14.70NBP35'W
l
Ifo
m
>5 l
}�I
1
an
her
184.88
— ----
N F S
_ eI
I I
I i6 I
I W
r
I
/ 60 I
89' -35'09W ---1
M-
A
n' I
17 1-5
.00
R=20R=20.00
18 R=6o.o0 _' _ `3><b"�g2='•--A=z2'54'.
A=2529'n'�F �- ♦ \ k' 23.99
26.?s1O�p ?� i
See Detail
x<� STREET L;� soa
EV .\
N. W. ,d>�'O pj�afe'37mK,� �\;r
R a 1920
so
7, algae a/i ' oil, \\
(SOP03'42'Eai
60 ic�tLe
City of Andover
County of Anoka
Sec. 25, T. 32, R. 24
Oral and U9w
llty Eanent• re
shown Mur
Ce
--j—SJ
Being 5 feet In width and adjoining
I
ot IIF., unless atherwlon shown,
and 10 tent In width and adjoining
sues! Inm unless otherwise shown
an the plat
For the purposes of this plot, Ne East
line of Ne southwest 1/4 of Seoticn 25,
Townehlp 32, Range 24 b aeeumad to
bear SD074'51'W.
w Omotm 1/2 Inde by 14 Inch Iran pipe
mmument found and marked m emi
o Dentin 1/2 Inch by 14 Inch loon pipe
rhorturnrint set and marked by Llaeme
Number 48176.
HOLLY
/--- STREET
as N. W. .
00'1�e ♦♦
jW
as 0
or
I �
an
ti I
1 N 1
�� %'Noo N
sr
40
♦
Demo
_ No Smb'
101 y '.
S00'24'51'Wm.�'
—%194.01 N _':` I
A point 1]80.00 feet vouN of I /' �_7=z4w�
the NE aomr of the NW ,/4
of Sea 25, T. U. R 24 ._ ---'I
•
•
•
NORTH
1 INCH = 50 FEET
0 50 ,00
SCALE IN ItFT
L A N D F O R M
From Site to Finish
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
Qj-
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: James Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: Joe Janish, Community
SUBJECT: Approve Final Plat/PSM Addition (replat of Clocktower Commons) — Planning
DATE: June 6, 2017
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is asked to approve the final plat for PSM Addition.
DISCUSSION
The proposed final plat creates 2 commercial lots in conformance with the approved preliminary
plat, and amended PUD for Clocktower Commons.
Park Dedication and Trail Fees
Park Dedication fees had been paid at the time of the original plat (Hamilton Square).
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is asked to adopt the attached resolution approving the final plat with conditions.
Attachments
Resolution
Location Map
Final Plat
es ect y ub itted,
Joe Janish
Community Development Director
Cc: Tom Roberts, BDT Land, LLC 6484 Pinnacle Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55346
Diane Leverentz, Classic Construction 18542 Ulysses Street NE East Bethel, MN 55011
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
I_'a&.�[o)a"*
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF "PSM Addition" FOR PROPERTY
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS:
Lot 3, Block 1, ANDOVER CLOCKTOWER COMMONS, Anoka County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the preliminary plat for the project to be known as
"PSM ADDITION"; and
WHEREAS, the final plat is consistent with the Planned Unit Development (PUD); and
WHEREAS, the final plat is consistent with the preliminary plat; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has presented a final plat of PSM ADDITION.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby
approve the final plat of PSM ADDITION contingent upon the following:
1. The plat shall conform to the final plat stamped received by the City of Andover May 30,
2017.
2. Each lot shall be subject to the Commercial Site Plan review process.
3. Building Permits will not be issued until final plat is recorded.
4. Conditions approved as part of the Preliminary Plat Resolution 043-17 must be
satisfactorily met prior to the filing of the final plat.
5. Contingent upon staff review and approval for compliance with City ordinances, policies
and guidelines.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 6th day of June, 2017.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Michelle Harmer, City Clerk Julie Trude, Mayor
PSM ADDITION
KNOW AL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That EDT Hddinga, U.C. a Minnesota limited liability campany owner of the
fdlawing described property.
Lot 3, W.cl, 1, AND04ER CLOCKTOWER COMMONS. Mala County Minnesota.
Has caused the same to be surveyed and plotted as PSM ADDITION as shown by this plat.
In win... whereat said DOT Holding, MC. a Minnesota limited liability campany, has caused these p,.onto to be signed
by its proper officera this day of 20—
EDT HOLDINGS, LLC
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
MI. instrument saw aHmawledgad before on. NT _ day of . 20_ by
as EDT Hddinga, LLC. a Minnesota limited liablity company, on behalf of Ne campany.
Notary Public, Colnty, Minnesota
My Commission E,Ires
I Jason E. Rud do hereby certify Nat Nie plat was prepared by me aw under my direct supervisiam that I am a duly
Licensed Land Surveyor in One State of Minnesota; Out this plat is a correct representation of One boundary surrey,
that all mathematical data and label. are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat
here has. or will be correctly set within we }ear, Nal all water boundaries and wet land, ue defined in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 50501, SNd. 3. as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plata and all public
woyd are shown and labeled an His plot.
Dated NM tlay of . 20_
Jason E Rud, Llcerued Land Surveyor
Minnesota Licanee No. 41578
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
This instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 20_ by Jason E Rud
Notary Public, County. Minnesota
My Commission Expires
City Council. City of Mdover, Minnesota
This plat of PSM ADDITION was approved and accepted by Ne City Cauncll of the qty of Mdonvei, Minnesota at a
regular meeting Hereof held this day of 20— and said plat la in compliance with
the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03. Sabel. 2
City Council, City of Malone, Minneaota
MayoClark
County Surveyor
I hereby cMify that In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.D21, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed
and approved Nie _ day of 20_ .
Larry D. Holum
Anoka County Surveyor
County Auditar/Treasurer
Pursuant to Minnesota Statute% Section 505.021. Subd 9. taxes payable In the year 20_ on the land hereinbefore
descHbed how been paid. Aero, p..ant to Minnesota Statutes. Ssclfam 272.12. there are no ddir,ort taxes and
transfer ent—d Nie day of 20 .
Properly Tax Administrator
By Deputy
County Rewrder/Registrar of Miss
County of Anoka. Slate of Minnesota
I hereby certify that this plat of PSM ADDMON was flied h the oMc, of the County Recorder/BegMtror of title. for
public record an Nie day of 20� at _ o'clock �M. and was duly recorded in
Book Page as Document Number
County Recorder/R.,ist or of Miss
By
Deputy
CITY OF ANDOVER
\ \ COUNTY OFANORA
\ \ SEC. 23, T3211, R24W
e \ \
\ \ .
\ O DENOTES SEr 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON RPE
\ ` - MARKED IES FOUND
MONUMENT. RLS N0.
1576.
• DFNOUND IRON MONUMENT.
A DENOTES PK NAL SET
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE SOUTHWESTERLY
LINE OF LOT 3. BLOCK 1. ANDOYTR MOCKTOWER
COMMONS IS ASSUMED TO HAYS A BEARING OF NORTH
38 DEGREES 4E MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST.
i� RECEIVED NORTH
/ SO o 15 JO 60 120
SCa:LMAY 3 0 2017 1 mac = sD mmain w .Da
/ et
XSONS, INC.
CITY OF ANDOVER EST 191 Professional Land Surveyors
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Jim Dickinson, City Administr
Michelle Harmer, Deputy City
Approve Extension of Liquor License/Beef O'Brady's
June 6, 2017
INTRODUCTION
Tony Zeece, of Beef O'Brady's, 15190 Bluebird Street has submitted a request for an
extension of their liquor license.
Beef O'Brady's is planning to hold an outdoor event Saturday, August 26, 2017 and
would like Council to approve an extension of their liquor license to include the fenced in
area located on the attached map.
Tom Roberts, Stonewood Properties, Inc. the owner of the property has given approval
for Beef O'Brady's to hold their outdoor event.
The BBQ event will run 12:00 p.m. — 7:00 p.m.
The band will play until 12:00 a.m.
Staff is recommending conditions for this permit approval. Conditions are the following:
1. The alcohol sold must be contained in the area. Patrons cannot carry alcohol thin
the parking lot.
2. The area shall be fenced/roped off.
3. Security must be provided by Beef O'Brady's.
Beef O'Brady's held this event last year with no complaints filed.
ACTION REQUIRED
Council is requested to consider the extension of the liquor license, request submitted by
Beef O'Brady's for August 26, 2017 with the conditions presented by staff.
Respectfully submitted,
Michelle Hartner
Deputy City Clerk
Attach: Outdoor Event Application
Event Map
Email from Tom Roberts, Stonewood Properties, Inc.
1685 CROSSTOWNBOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
OUTDOOR EVENTS ARE PERMITTED ON "WEEKENDS (FRIDAYS AND
SATURDAYS) IN JUNE, JULY AND AUGUST. ESTABLISHMENTS ARE
ALLOWED ONE EVENT WEEKEND PER CALENDAR YEAR. EVENT MUST
END AT MIDNIGHT.
Commercial Outdoor Event Application
i
Name of Business Owner: G �� % _ { e c -,e
Name
Address
kj-/ sf - /,j a, #// V
Phone Number of Business: 7 C _? " t% -2-7 0 d
2. Date(s) of Outdoor Event:_ i
1 Time of Event:
4. Location of Tent and/or Band:
(Provide a sketch on the back of this form detailing where the tent, stage and/or
band will be located on the property, indicating lot boundary lines and building
locations.)
5. Extension of Liquor.License: Yes No
6. Please provide verification from your Insurance Company indicating your liability
insurance provides coverage outside of the premise..
7. Please provide written permission from property owner,
Applicant of this application will comply with Andover City Code 5-6, Noise
Control. The business is required to provide security for the outdoor event.
Dated: �_ / 7 C ;z
Owner's Sign tore"
Approved Denied:
City Clerk
Council Action: _Approved Denied Date:
OF
,
t og,
PROVIDE A SKETCH DETAILING WHERE THE TENT, STAGE AND/OR
BAND WILL BE LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY, INDICATING LOT
BOUNDARY LINES AND BUILDING LOCATIONS.
„�cf
�� ;� Tt
Subject: RE: 2017 Tent Party/BBQ contest
From: Tom Rober
To:
Cc:
Date: Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:43 PM
Sounds good to me.
Tom Roberts
Stonewood Properties, Inc.
11015 Bell Oaks Estate Rd
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
From: Tony and Matt Zeece [mailto.
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:40 PM
To: Tom Roberto
Subject: 2017 Tent PartyBBQ contest
Can we get your approval for our tent party and BBQ cook off again this year. It will take place on August 26th. Thanks.
Tony
Beef'O' Brady's
. I T LNDOW,
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW. CLAN DOVER. MN. US
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: Erick Sutherland, Recreational Facilities Manager
SUBJECT: Approve Resolution Accepting Contribution from the Andover Youth
Hockey Association / Andover Community Center
DATE: June 6, 2017
INTRODUCTION
This item is in regard to approving a resolution accepting a donation made by Andover
Youth Hockey Association (AHYHA). AHYHA is donating a new scoreboard to the
Andover Community Center to be located on the North wall within the Ice Arena.
DISCUSSION
AHYHA has made a one-time donation of a new scoreboard (Valued at $17,000) and the
associated installation costs. The existing scoreboard will be relocated to the South wall
in the Ice Arena as part of this project. ACC will control all advertising on the new
scoreboard and will facilitate what is necessary to maximize the new advertising
opportunity.
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting the donation from
AHYHA.
Respectfully Submitted,
Erick Sutherland
Attachments: Scoreboard rendering
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION OF A HOCKEY SCOREBOARD MADE
TO THE CITY OF ANDOVER TO BE USED AT THE ANDOVER COMMUNITY
CENTER.
WHEREAS, any contributions that are to be made to the City of Andover must be
accepted by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the scoreboard donation from Andover Youth Hockey Association to
be used for hockey events at the Andover Community Center.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby accept the
contribution, which is to be used at the Andover Community Center.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the City
Council at a regular meeting this 6th day of June 2017, with Councilmembers
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmembers
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
�1110161y_1►19Z01V/A:7
ATTEST:
Julie Trude - Mayor
Michelle Hartner - Deputy City Clerk
ANDOVER COMMUNITY CENTER
GM
] .. 11 wIn� �i . i C avw c 1 1 ON
G IOAL 32 :S I Out :11 1 GOAL
10 ; s S PERIOD 32 I I. S 2 S
ANDOVER COMMUNITY CENTER ANDOVER, MN
Do not use for design/engineering or ad copy approval.
Copyright 02017 Daktronlcs DD3629627 (05-01-17 litevO revised 00-0D001j 10
The details and expressions shown are conceptual in nature, confidential and proprietary. final design and appearance may differ from artwork shown. DA KT R0 N I CS
All registered trademarks are the properly of the registrant and their use does not imply endorsement of Doktronlo. Do not raprod. 6y awry mean. wnhaat the expmaed wriaen concent of Duktron"., t„c.
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Jim Dickinson, City Administr,
Michelle Harmer, Deputy City
Approve Refuse/Recycler Hauler Licenses
June 6, 2017
INTRODUCTION
Refuse/recycle hauler licenses expired on May 31, 2017.
DISCUSSION
The following licensed haulers in the City have applied for renewal of their licenses.
Loe's Oil Company Inc.
Waste Management
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to approve residential and commercial licenses for the
haulers listed above, contingent upon payment of appropriate fees and their trucks
passing inspections performed by our mechanics. The license period will be from June 7,
2017 through May 31, 2018.
Respectfully submitted,
Lm 4rw-"
Michelle Hartner
Deputy City Clerk
Attach: License Applications
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
1. Business Name
LICENSE APPLICATION
REFUSE/RECYCLE HAULERS
2. Address of Business:
Street City State Zip
3. Business Phone Number/�7r, -�2 E-mail Address _
4. Owner of the cnllnntinn canrirP-
Name (Please print) rnone Number .J
A
Street Address City State Zip
5. Attach a description of each piece of equipment proposed to be used in the
collection operation.
6. Attach a schedule of services to be made to the customer including, but not
limited to, proposed days of collection in different areas of the city.
7. Attach a schedule of varying rates based on the volume of weight of the refuse
collected indicating the charge for each size container or other schedule of
charges.
8. Provide a certificate of public liability insurance in the amount of at least
$100,000 for injuries, including accidental death, to any one person and in an
amount not less than $300,000 for each accident; and for loss or damage to
property in the amount of $50,000.
9. Check all types of materials you collect and indicate where they are taken for
disposal/processing or recycling:
Name & Location of Disposal/Processing/Recycling
Garbage
Tires
AUsed Oil
Appliances
C'.
U
10.
11
Name & Location of Disposal/Processing/Recycling
Corrugated
Edible Food Waste
Scrap Metal
Yard Waste
Demolition/Construction Debris
Paper/Paper Products
Plastics
Newspaper
Ashes
Tree Debris
Office Paper
Glass
Other - specify
License(s) Requested: Residential ($150) K Commercial ($150)
Number of trucks proposed to be licensed ($25
per truck)
Applicant acknowle s receipt of a copy of City Code Title 4, Chapter 2 and agrees to
co at all times ' h the provisions of said ordinance.
Sign ture Date
Commercial License
Per Truck Fee*
-ouncil Action: Approved
$150.00 License/Receipt #Z80 17 _ D6'A�
$150.00 Insurance Expiration Dates
$25.00 * $50.00 re -inspection fee per truck if 1St
inspection fails.
Denied Date
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
LICENSE APPLICATION
REFUSE/RECYCLE HAULERS
Business Name
2. Address of Business:
City State Zip
Business Phone Number 0 I10D E-mail Address
4. Owner of the collection
(Please
City State Zip
0-1100
Attach a description of each piece of equipment proposed to be used in the
collection operation.
6. Attach a schedule of services to be made to the customer including, but not
limited to, proposed days of collection in different areas of the city.
Attach a schedule of varying rates based on the volume of weight of the refuse
collected indicating the charge for each size container or other schedule of
charges.
8. Provide a certificate of public liability insurance in the amount of at least
$100,000 for injuries, including accidental death, to any one person and in an
amount not less than $300,000 for each accident; and for loss or damage to
property in the amount of $50,000.
9. Check all types of materials you collect and indicate where they are taken for
disposal/processing or recycling:
Name & Location of Disposal/Processing/Recycling
Garbage �� i - 010n (G153" �Vk lJ Lt)
Tires
Used Oil
Appliances W M - IVB DUFF v' y -t- i 5 1 o G:3.3 I� A-vz q
Name & Location of Disposal/Processing/Recycling
Corrugated (A)111 Vwi,1s
Edible Food Waste
X Scrap MetalV,l)11'1 1�V, (,;kjos VMf-F-1jlL�-r 14,
)( Yard Waste s'r' y E k,, j0U1 ce I wV Auz Lry\fir
X Demolition/Construction Debris ( p — i C "-i /, rl - i G � m Ay-, o W Q I(- �2J-;, �—
Paper/Paper Products WAj ::Z,,;yi {,'P S 1MI2 gDl1 �r o�dwe i 0,
r1'15
J
x Plastics
7( Newspaper
Ashes
Tree Debris 5V-9 L 3 o j�n.l Cn �n -Vt jtilV i S
Office Paper Wyy�--FVr),y\ (,+,c,y lmr-e -VBDn 3knc Nj,tS
Glass
Other - specify
10. License(s) Requested:
11
r,
Residential �9 Commercial
Number of trucks proposed to be licensed
Applicant acknowledges receipt of a copy of City Code Title 4, Chapter 2 and agrees to
com at all t with the provisions of said ordinance.
JL�
a[ure Date
Fees: Residential License $150.00 License/Receipt # Qu I"1- p o a .)- i 2
ozo 1'7 -60a00 - L
Commercial License $150.00 Insurance Expiration Date: 1. 1 • 18
Per Truck Fee* $25.00 * $50.00 re -inspection fee per truck if I"
inspection fails.
Action: Approved Denied Date
r 5 - i So. 06
C0 ' ;5e.00 sX17S.to
� iruc�s - i75,aD �
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
(763) 755-5100 FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: Joe Janish, Community Development for
Dan Krumwiede, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Variance Request — 16422 Hanson Blvd NW —Dover Kennels - Planning
DATE: June 6, 2017
61
INTRODUCTION
Mrs. Jill Huston submitted a variance request for her property located at 16422 Hanson Blvd
NW. The request regards the current lot size and a proposed 17 ft. x 20 ft. building addition.
This property currently has a Conditional Use Permit to operate a dog kennel, which was
approved in 1988.
Variance Review
Mrs. Huston submitted a letter and is proposing a variance to add an addition to an accessory
structure which exceeds the total square footage of land covered by the foundation of the
principal structure by 20 square feet.
City code 12-6-4 states that accessory buildings on a residential parcel with a lot area of five
acres or less, but more than one acre, shall not exceed the total square footage of land covered by
the foundation of the principal structure. The current principal structure is 1,920 square feet and
the accessory structure after the addition will be 1,940 square feet. The variance request is to
allow the accessory structure to exceed the principal structure by 20 square feet.
The owner has executed a Contract for Deed to purchase 1.5 acres of neighboring vacant land in
order to correct an encroachment issue. If they were to file the Contract for Deed now, then a
variance would not be needed. However, the applicant has indicated the Contract for Deed and
lot split cannot be recorded at this time due to the State/County requirement that all 2017
property tax be paid in full prior to the recording. Therefore, applicant indicated they cannot
presently afford to record the Contract for Deed. The parties have stated they intend to record
the contract and lot split in October 2017, after all property taxes for the year are certified and
paid. At that time, there will be a recorded Contract for Deed that will result in a combined land
area of 5.55 acres, allowing them to build the proposed 17x20 addition to the Dover Kennels
office building.
Review Criteria
City Code 12-14-7 outlines criteria when considering a variance. Code states "Variances
may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical
difficulties in complying with the official control. "Practical difficulties" as used in
connection with the granting of a variance, means:
1. The property owner proposed to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by
an official control.
• A property owner resides in the R-1 district which tends to have larger lots and allows
for larger accessory structures.
• Property owner is in process of acquiring additional land that once complete will
create a parcel that is 5.55 acres.
• The property owner has 4.05 acres which only allows for accessory structures that do
not exceed the foundation of the home.
2. The plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not
created by the landowner.
• The property was purchased originally in 1988 as 5 acres. Anoka County acquired
.95 acres for Hanson Blvd ROW. The current applicant purchased the property in
2000. The current applicant is acquiring additional land through a Contract for Deed
to meet the 5 acre requirement.
• The building has existed since 1988 and is used for the same purpose and they now
need additional space.
3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality and will not
alter the rural residential character.
• This property is in a rural area that tends to have larger accessory structures.
• Properties to the N and NE have accessory structures that appear to be larger than the
foundation of the home.
• The applicant is in the process of acquiring 1.5 additional acres.
4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.
• The applicant is in the process of acquiring 1.5 additional acres.
• The applicant is spending additional funds for the addition.
• The Contract for Deed and lot split cannot be recorded at this time due to the
State/County requirement that all 2017 property tax be paid in full prior to recording.
Andover Review Committee (ARC) Comments
ARC reviewed the proposed variance request and had no comments pertaining to the request, as
variances tend to follow policy decision based on set criteria identified in the ordinance.
Public Comments
No public comments where received as part of the public hearing process with the exception of
the manager of the facility. The manager indicated the addition would provide additional storage
and provide additional space as clients come and go from the facility.
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
On May 24, 2017, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing. Meeting minutes
are attached for your review. No formal comments were received.
The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed how the proposal could avoid the
variance if taxes are paid and the contract for deed is recorded. The applicant also could
have the ability to remove 1 foot from the length of the building reducing the building
size by the 20 feet, which would no longer require a variance. The Commissioners also
noted the current owner acquired the property after the County acquired .95 acres from it.
With the variance, not meeting all the criteria the Commission recommended to deny the
request on a 3 to 1 vote (3 absent).
ACTION REQUESTED
The City Council is requested to consider the variance request and consider denial as outlined by
the Planning and Zoning Commission. In the event, City Council considers moving forward with
an approval for the request, attached is a resolution for approval.
Attachments
Resolutions of Approval and Denial
Location Map
Photo Location Map
Photos
Existing Contours, Floodplain, and Wetlands
City Code 12-14-7
Draft Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes 05.24.17
Property Survey
Re e fu s bmi ed,
Joe anish
Community Development Director
Cc: Jill and Michael Huston, 16422 Hanson Boulevard NW, Andover, MN 55304
i
� u •,,ate* t" -p: p,�, " ;��
F�� • r Illi -1+ � 't�ys�
Lv.
K , �
I
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES NO.
A RESOLUTION DENYING THE VARIANCE REQUEST TO ADD AN ADDITION TO AN
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WHICH EXCEEDS THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF LAND
COVERED BY THE FOUNDATION OF THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE, LOCATED AT 16422
HANSON BOULEVARD NW, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS:
The property is legally described as the southerly 330 feet of the easterly 660 feet of the North Half of
the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County,
Minnesota, Subject to easement of record.
WHEREAS, Dover Kennels has requested a variance for an addition to an accessory structure which
exceeds the total square footage of land covered by the foundation of the principal structure at the subject
property by 20 square feet, and;
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a Public Hearing pursuant to the requirements of
City Code 12-14-8, and;
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said
request does not meet the criteria of City Code, and;
WHEREAS, based on the criteria for granting a variance under City Code 12-14-713, the Planning and
Zoning Commission finds the following findings of fact to support the denial of the variance requests:
• The property owner has 4.05 acres which only allows for accessory structures that do not exceed
the foundation of the home.
• The applicant acquired the property with 4.05, after the County acquired the .95 acres.
• If the applicant where to pay the property taxes the contract could be recorded and the parcel
would then be large enough to allow for the proposed addition.
• The applicant has the ability to lower the square footage by 20 feet and then the building would
meet the zoning requirements.
WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council to deny the variance
request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees
with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and denies the 20 square foot variance
at 16422 Hanson Boulevard NW.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 6th day of June, 2017.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Michelle Hartner, Deputy City Clerk
Julie Trude, Mayor
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VARIANCE REQUEST TO ADD AN ADDITION TO
AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WHICH EXCEEDS THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
LAND COVERED BY THE FOUNDATION OF THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE, LOCATED
AT 16422 HANSON BOULEVARD NW, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS:
The property is legally described as the southerly 330 feet of the easterly 660 feet of the North
Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 32, Range 24,
Anoka County, Minnesota, Subject to easement of record.
WHEREAS, Dover Kennels has requested a variance for an addition to an accessory structure
which exceeds the total square footage of land covered by the foundation of the principal
structure at the subject property by 20 square feet, and;
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a Public Hearing pursuant to the
requirements of City Code 12-14-8, and;
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined
that said request meets the criteria of City Code, and;
WHEREAS, based on the criteria for granting a variance under City Code 12-14-713; City
Council finds the following findings of fact to support the approval of the variance requests:
• A property owner resides in the R-1 district which tends to have larger lots and allows for
larger accessory structures.
• Property owner is in process of acquiring additional land that once complete will create a
parcel that is 5.55 acres.
• The property was purchased originally in 1988 as 5 acres. Anoka County acquired .95
acres for Hanson Blvd ROW. The current applicant purchased the property in 2000. The
current applicant is acquiring additional land through a Contract for Deed to meet the 5
acre requirement.
• The building has existed since 1988 and is used for the same purpose and they now need
additional space.
• The applicant is spending additional funds for the addition.
WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of
the variance request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby
agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the 20
square foot variance request at 16422 Hanson Boulevard NW.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 6th day of June, 2017.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Michelle Hartner, Deputy City Clerk
Julie Trude, Mayor
Location Map
leoas � ,
r�
i
PHOTO LOCATION MAP
PHOTO A
•K::. ,i
Existing 2' Contours, Floodplain, and Wetlands
w
V 1
�t
YI �
� 4
1t
C. Procedure:
1. Request For Conditional Use; Fee: The person applying for a
Conditional Use Permit shall fill out and submit to the Community
Development Director a request for Conditional Use Permit form together
with a fee as set forth by ordinance. An additional fee as set forth by
ordinance may be required for each meeting in excess of two (2), which is
necessary because of incomplete information or changes in the petition.
The Community Development Director shall refer the application to the
Planning and Zoning Commission. (Amended Ord. 8,10-21-1970; amd.
2003 Code)
2. A public hearing shall be held in accordance with section 12-14-8.
(Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
3. City Council Action: After a completed application has been submitted,
the City Council shall follow the deadline for response as outlined in State
Statute 15.99. (Amended Ord. 314, 10-4-2005)
4. Amended Application: An Amended Conditional Use Permit application
shall be administered in a manner similar to that required for a new
conditional use permit; and the fee shall be as set forth by ordinance'.
Amended conditional use permits shall include reapplications for permits
that have been denied, requests for changes in conditions, and as
otherwise described in this title. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970; amd. 2003
Code)
5. Reapplication After Denial: No application for a Conditional Use Permit
shall be resubmitted for a period of one year from the date of said order of
denial.
6. Hearing May Be Held: When a Conditional Use Permit may be of
general interest to the community or to more than the adjoining owners,
the Planning and Zoning Commission may hold a public hearing, and the
Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed with notice of said hearing
published at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. (Amended Ord. 314,
10-4-2005)
D. Time Limit On Implementing Conditional Use: If the City Council
determines that no significant progress has been made in the first twelve
(12) months after the approval of the Conditional Use Permit, the permit
will be null and void. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970)
* 12-14-7: VARIANCES:
1 See subsection 1-7-3H of this code.
A. Variances Authorized: The City Council, as authorized by Minn. Stat.
462.354 subdivision 2, and Minn. Stat. 462.357, subdivision 6, shall have
the authority to hear requests for variances from the requirements of the
zoning ordinance and other sections of the City Code where variances
are authorized, including restrictions placed on nonconformities.
(Amended Ord. 407, 6-21-11)
B. Review Criteria:
1. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the
general purposes and intent of the official control and when the variances
are consistent with the comprehensive plan. (Amended Ord. 407, 6-21-11)
2. Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance
establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the official
control. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting
of a variance, means:
a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a
reasonable manner not permitted by an official control;
b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to
the property not created by the landowner;
c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of
the locality;
d. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical
difficulties. (Amended Ord. 407, 6-21-11)
C. Conditions Authorized: The City Council may impose conditions in the
granting of variances. A condition must be directly related to and must bear a
rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. (Amended Ord.
407,6-21-11)
D. Specific Variances Authorized: No variance may be granted that would
allow any use that is not allowed in the zoning district in which the subject
property is located, except as follows: (Amended Ord. 407, 6-21-11)
1. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined
in Minn. Stat. 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with the official
controls. (Amended Ord. 407, 6-21-11)
2. Variances may be granted for the temporary use of a one family
dwelling as a two family dwelling. (Amended Ord. 407, 6-21-11)
E. Procedure: The procedure for granting variances is as follows:
1. Request For Variance; Fee: A person desiring a variance shall fill out
and submit to the Community Development Director a request for variance
application form together with a fee asset forth by ordinance'. (Amended
Ord. 407, 6-21-11)
2. Planning and Zoning Commission Review: A public hearing shall be
held by the Planning and Zoning Commission as provided in City Code
12-14-8. The Planning Commission shall make a recommendation to the
City Council based upon the provisions of City Code 12-14-7. (Amended
Ord. 407, 6-21-11)
3. City Council Action: The City Council may grant the variance based
upon the provisions of City Code 12-14-7. (Amended Ord. 407, 6-21-11)
4. Appeals: The petitioner, if appealing an interpretation of this title by an
employee of the city which would require him/her to obtain a variance,
shall have the fee refunded if his/her appeal is upheld by the City Council.
5. Emergency Variance Requests: The City Council may waive Planning
and Zoning Commission review and take immediate action on emergency
variance requests that affect the immediate health, safety and welfare of
the citizens of Andover or if time constraints present severe hardship to
the applicant. The applicant is required to show the immediacy of the
issue and the potential health, safety or welfare threat. The City Council
shall determine if the request warrants immediate review. (Amended Ord.
407, 6-21-11)
6. Time Limit On Implementing Variance: If the City Council determines
that no significant progress has been made in the first twelve (12) months
after the approval of the variance, the variance will be null and void.
(Amended Ord. 8,10-21-1970)
I See subsection 1-7-31-1 of this code.
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - May 24, 2017
Page 2
Commissioner Nemeth requested the following corrections to the May 9, 2017, Planning
and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting:
-Page 5, line 29, strike the entire sentence: "The Commissioners did not have any
questions of staff."
-Page 6, line 1, remove
-Page 6, line 22, replace "CPA" with "Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA)"
Page 6, line 28, insert a comma after "2016"
-Page 6, line 29, replace "Comprehensive Plan amendment" with "CPA"
-Page 6, line 40-41, replace "rural reserve area" with "Rural Reserve District (RRD)"
-Page 6, line 42, add "Motion by Peterson, seconded by Hudson, to open the public
hearing at 8:42 p.m. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2 -absent vote (Cleven and
Daninger)."
-Page 7, line 4, replace "open" with "close"
-Page 7, line 4, replace "8:43 p.m." with "8:44 p.m."
-Page 7, line 15, replace "easements can be one of the tools" with "easements, that can
be"
-Page 7, line 31, replace "rural reserve" with "Rural Reserve District"
-Page 7, line 36, insert a comma after "however"
-Page 7, line 36, replace "planning" with "Planning"
-Page 7, line 37, replace "commission" with "Commission" DRAFT
-Page 7, line 37, replace "city council" with "City Council"
-Page 7, line 43, insert "District" after "Reserve"
-Page 8, line 21, replace "adherence" with "violations"
Motion by Nemeth, seconded by Peterson, to approve the minutes as amended. Motion
carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3 -absent vote (Cleven, Hudson, Koehler).
PUBLIC HEARING: Variance - Addition to Accessory Structure - 16422 Hanson
Blvd. NW -Dover Kennels.
Associate Planner Krumwiede reviewed the variance request submitted by Jill and
Michael Huston, 16422 Hanson Boulevard NW, for an addition to an accessory structure
that exceeds the allowable total square footage of land covered by the foundation of the
principal structure. He stated this property currently has a Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
to operate a dog kennel, which was approved in 1988.
Mr. Krumwiede stated the variance is required as the accessory structure with the
proposed addition would exceed 20 square feet, for a total of 1940 square feet.
He added the applicants have executed an agreement to purchase 1.5 acres of adjacent
vacant property to address an encroachment issue.
Mr. Krumwiede stated the variance is required as the Contract for Deed has not been
completed. He added that 2017 property taxes must be paid in full prior to recording the
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes — May 24, 2017
Page 3
Contract for Deed by State statute, but the applicant is unable to pay the balance of 2017
property taxes and record the Contract for Deed until October 2017.
Mr. Krumwiede stated the variance request approval requires that there are no practical
difficulties with compliance. He added the applicant must establish that the property will
be used in a reasonable manner; any unique circumstances were not created by the
landowner; the variance, if granted, will not alter the character of the area, nor alter the
rural residential character; and there are economic considerations.
Mr. Krumwiede stated the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission will
be reviewed by the City Council at their June 6, 2017, Regular Meeting.
Commissioner Peterson asked whether the applicant would need a variance if the
proposed addition was smaller. Mr. Krumwiede stated the applicant would not need a
variance if it was 20 square feet smaller.
Commissioner Nemeth asked whether the proposed addition will be on the front of the
accessory structure, and what the addition will look like. Mr. Krumwiede confirmed the
proposed addition will be added to the front of the accessory structure and showed photos
of the existing structure. DRAFT
Commissioner Nemeth asked whether the existing buildings are located a sufficient
distance from the flood plain. City Planner Hanson confirmed this.
Motion by Nemeth, seconded by Sims, to open the public hearing at 7:17 p.m. Motion
carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3 -absent vote (Cleven, Hudson, Koehler).
Mark Anderson, Dover Kennels, stated he is the operations manager for the applicants.
He added the proposed addition will be an extension of the current accessory structure,
and it will be designed and built by a licensed contractor to match the look of the house.
Mr. Anderson stated the additional storage and a larger reception area will allow Dover
Kennels to provide more space for customers and their dogs. He added this will be very
beneficial for their business. He noted the applicant hopes to create a fully functional
workspace, as the current buildings were built over the course of several decades by the
previous owner and are not well planned.
Mr. Anderson stated the applicant is allowed by Statute to close the contract in October
2017. He added the property itself will not change, but the proposed addition to Dover
Kennels will be a better place for employees, customers and pets.
Community Development Director Janish stated that Anoka County acquired a portion of
this property, .95 acres, for right-of-way before the applicants purchased the property.
The property, at one time, was 5 acres in size. Chairperson Daninger stated the
acquisition of land by the County could be considered a hardship.
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes — May 24, 2017
Page 4
Commissioner Peterson asked why the applicant wants to wait until October 2017 to
record the Deed for Contract. Mr. Anderson stated property taxes are certifiable twice
per year, in May and in October. He added it would be financially difficult for the
applicants to make the two property tax payments so close together. He noted the
adjacent property would be affected by this as well.
Motion by Sims, seconded by Nemeth, to close the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. Motion
carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3 -absent vote (Kleven, Hudson, Koehler).
Motion by Nemeth to recommend approval of Res. No. _, variance request for an
addition to an accessory structure that exceeds the total square footage land covered by
the foundation of the principal structure by 20 square feet, for Jill and Michael Huston,
16422 Hanson Boulevard NW.
The motion failed for lack of a second.
Commissioner Peterson stated City Code is generally restrictive with these types of
variances and the staff report includes a list of 4 criteria for consideration. He added he
has questions about the second and fourth criteria as outlined in the staff report: the
second criterion relates to circumstances unique to the property; and the fourth criterion
relates to economic considerations. He noted Anoka County acquired land for a right-of-
way, but it is unclear exactly when that happened. He noted he has questions about
proving economic hardship. AFT
Commissioner Sims agreed, adding these criteria do not meet the threshold of what is
required for a variance.
Chairperson Daninger stated he concurs with Commissioners Peterson and Sims.
Motion by Peterson, and seconded by Sims, to recommend denial of the variance request
for an addition to an accessory structure for Jill and Michael Huston, 16422 Hanson
Boulevard NW, based on the second and fourth variance criteria as outlined in the staff
report, related to unique property circumstances; and, economic considerations. Motion
to deny carried on a 3 -ayes, 1 -nay (Nemeth), 3 -absent vote (Kleven, Hudson, Koehler).
Mr. Krumwiede stated that this item would be reviewed by the City Council at their June
6, 2017, Regular Meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit —Massage Therapy Home Occupation —
15824 Olive St. NW —Lisa Scholl.
City Planner Hanson reviewed the request of Lisa Scholl, 15824 Olive Street NW, for a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for an in-home massage therapy business. Therapeutic
MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR:
JEFF BERGERON
NORTH LINE OF THE NEI/4 OF SEc. 15. T.32. N.24
7:PARCEI-{r -PIM 15 •SZ-2y-ri-oaoZ
Existing Property eescrlprlon - 16474 Hansen Blvd. NW
(Per County ]§x Asaessorl
The
NIy2 Of the N£1/4 of the 10£1/4 of Section ter Township 72, Range 24,
q� ka County, Minnesota, except the southerly jab feet Gf the easterly
660 Feet and except road.
Suggested Revised Property OOc,,I tlon - 16474 Hanson Blvd. NW
(After Split)
AnOR Coun ty, tMlnnaeo taf tAYYt^&N£1/4Mfendew st/of or
eesou to j3b.0Peet lor3tireRa^st 24,
796.0 feet and west of AND A COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT M. 27. ea
SCALE IN FEET
SCALE, I INCH = 100 FEET
mimmimmmmm
0 100 200
BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED
#16474
12.36 Acres
(after split)
- NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 330. OF ME NEI/4 OF THE NEI/4
s 68.46.08^E 733.06
KURTH SURVRTING. INC.
9 J6PaanaaN wt. a.i.
..C.
rteaxaieua as eeul
n Vn1 tea...
P{IRLEL-8- PILI IS-31-24-II-C76oL4
Existing Progrty Descrlptlon - )6422 Hanson Blvd. NW
(Par County Tax Assessor)
The southerly 30 feet of the easterly 660 feet of she
Range 24, Anake C.daty the 106114
at
nedTownsh 1p 32,
#16422
4.05 Acres (existing)
SW Orad Revised Property Description - 16422 Hanson Blvd. NW
u (A [taming split Parcel)
That pare of the sou enemyffgg30.0 leer of the ..Orerly 790.0 teat
Roame241/Anoka CountYl/4Mlnnesota, i14 at lying westlon of ANOKA CnaAlp 321
HIGHWAY 24k Anoka
PLAT N0. 27 O(/N'!Y
190.02 -I-METAL SHED 535.06
N 68'46,6^W 1103.75
SOUTH LINE OF THE NI/2 OF THE NEI/4 OF MC NEI/4.or SEc. 15, T.32, R.24
NOTE, THIS IS NOT A TOTAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. NO LOCATION OF BUILDINGS IMPROVEMENT$ EASEMENTS,
ENCROACHMENTS OR OTHER BOUNDARY CORNERS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN HEREON.
IULlaa-.I RASO- b)v- nhJ
ATTACHMENT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
- 125.01 125,
196.02
• DENOTES IRON PIPE MONUMENT POUND
C DENOTES 1/2e IRON PIPE MARKED LLS Rdy
�F}RCEL G
DENOTES CAST IRON MONNM£NT
/
o
SPLIT
i�I}RC Er C"ryy�y
M
o
Proposed Property Oeacrl tion - Sp If Parcel
tro Bo Attachod to /64p2 Hannan Bl.d.)
PAIS CEL
feat
o
The south 730.0 feetf the west 196.0
Nf the east 7 6.0 feet of the NI/2 of the
1 the
o
EI/4 NEI/4 of the 15, Tnwnshlp 32,
Range 24, Anoka County, Allnneao to.
z
1.5£0 Acres
W`
Y
450.67
KURTH SURVRTING. INC.
9 J6PaanaaN wt. a.i.
..C.
rteaxaieua as eeul
n Vn1 tea...
P{IRLEL-8- PILI IS-31-24-II-C76oL4
Existing Progrty Descrlptlon - )6422 Hanson Blvd. NW
(Par County Tax Assessor)
The southerly 30 feet of the easterly 660 feet of she
Range 24, Anake C.daty the 106114
at
nedTownsh 1p 32,
#16422
4.05 Acres (existing)
SW Orad Revised Property Description - 16422 Hanson Blvd. NW
u (A [taming split Parcel)
That pare of the sou enemyffgg30.0 leer of the ..Orerly 790.0 teat
Roame241/Anoka CountYl/4Mlnnesota, i14 at lying westlon of ANOKA CnaAlp 321
HIGHWAY 24k Anoka
PLAT N0. 27 O(/N'!Y
190.02 -I-METAL SHED 535.06
N 68'46,6^W 1103.75
SOUTH LINE OF THE NI/2 OF THE NEI/4 OF MC NEI/4.or SEc. 15, T.32, R.24
NOTE, THIS IS NOT A TOTAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. NO LOCATION OF BUILDINGS IMPROVEMENT$ EASEMENTS,
ENCROACHMENTS OR OTHER BOUNDARY CORNERS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN HEREON.
IULlaa-.I RASO- b)v- nhJ
ATTACHMENT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
- 125.01 125,
I
• DENOTES IRON PIPE MONUMENT POUND
C DENOTES 1/2e IRON PIPE MARKED LLS Rdy
0 DENOTES 40d SPIKE SET
DENOTES CAST IRON MONNM£NT
. • tw-
ON
1
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
Joe Janish, Community Developm t irecto4
FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) - In Home Therapeutic Massage Therapy - 15824
Olive St NW - Lisa Scholl
DATE: June 6, 2017
INTRODUCTION
The applicant is seeking a CUP for an in-home massage therapy business. Therapeutic massage
is permitted as a conditional use in an R-4 Single Family -Urban zoned district as a Home
Occupation.
DISCUSSION
The applicant has been a Certified Massage Therapist for 14 years. No more than 3 clients will
be taken each day. The proposed massage area will be located in the lower level and will require
no physical changes to the interior or exterior. Clients will enter and leave through the front door.
There will be no outdoor space used.
Days and Hours of Operation
Hours and days of operation will vary. There will be no more than three (3) clients per day;
however, no clients will be on the premises before 7:00 am or after 10:00 pm.
Traffic
Due to the small number of clients as well as the appointment -based nature of the business, Olive
St NW will only receive a minimal increase in traffic and will not adversely affect the
surrounding roadways.
Parking
City Code 12-13-8 specifies the number of parking spaces required for various uses. Being that
the proposed space to be used for in-home therapeutic massage is also a single family home, they
are considered one entity. Single Family Residential has a requirement of 2 spaces in addition to
the required garage. The clients will park in the driveway of the home.
Review Criteria
12-14-6 B: Criteria for Granting Conditional Use Permits:
1. In granting a Conditional Use Permit, the City Council shall consider the advice and
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and:
a. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals, and general
welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
b. Existing and anticipated traffic conditions, including parking facilities on adjacent
streets and land.
c. The effect on values of property and scenic view in the surrounding area, and the
effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan.
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
On May 24 2017, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing regarding the CUP
request in which there was no public input. A draft of the meeting minutes have been attached
for your review. The Commission recommended approval on a 4-0 (3 absent) vote with the
addition of Condition #4 There shall be no more than five (5) clients per day.
The Commission discussed the following items:
• Ensuring parking requirements are met
• Discussions limiting the number of clients per day
ACTION REQUESTED
The City Council is asked to review the CUP request and consider the recommendation of
approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Attachments
Resolution
Location Map
Photos of Site
Applicant's Letter
Draft May 24, 2017 PZ Meeting Minutes
City Code 12-9, Home Occupations
City Code 3-6, Massage Businesses and Services
Respectfull b ' ed,
Stephanie L. Hanson
Andover City Planner
Cc: Lisa Scholl, 15824 Olive Street NW, Andover, MN 55304
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ON-SITE IN-HOME
THERAPUETIC MASSAGE SERVICES ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15824 OLIVE
STREET NW LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
LOT 3, BLOCK 1, MILLER'S WOODS 2ND ADDITION, ANDOVER MN
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested approval of a conditional use permit for on-site
therapeutic massage services on the subject property; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing pursuant to City Code;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a
detrimental effect upon the health, safety, and general welfare of the City of Andover; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council the approval
of this request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover has
received the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and hereby approves the
conditional use permit for off-site therapeutic massage services subject to the following
conditions:
1. All aspects of the home occupation shall conform to the requirements of City Code
Title 3, Chapter 6 Massage Businesses and Services.
2. A parking space for clients shall be established in the driveway of the residence.
3. Hours of operation shall be daily from 7:00 a.m. —10:00 p.m.
4. There shall be no more than five (5) clients per day.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 6th day of June, 2017.
ATTEST:
Michelle Harmer, Deputy City Clerk
Julie Trude, Mayor
16093
16063
O,, E R
1177 16124 1055 971
16119
T608.2 �Q
16066 16090
034
16050
03
1127,-16i"ri9115991 16060
VA
Andover General Mapping Map
16147
16150
� 741
643
621
1 557
1 545
890
15890
0 15845
15850
a15810 ` 921 887 15762
15726
Date Created: May 19, 2017
Disclaimer: The provider makes no representation or warranties with respect to the reuse of this data.
.:i
16019
159°
15929
556
512
525
574 1524
724
01
15745 692 668 644 m
r
�3 719 677 629 546a0
0 0i
co 0
U0
07
Z
rA
Applicant's Letter
May 8 , 2017
City of Andover Planning Division
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am requesting a permit to operate a home therapeutic massage business at 15824 Olive St NW (Miller's Woods). I
have been a Certified Massage Therapist since 2003. My licensed therapeutic massage business will be located in
the lower level, in a room 13'x16'. The room has adequate facilities for restroom and changing. The room also has
a closet with shelves for storing supplies in an acceptable way. All clients will enter through the front door of the
primary residence and will exit in the same manner. Hours of operation will be varying days and times, however no
clients will be on the premises before 7:OOam or after 10:00pm any day. There will be no more than one client on
the premises at anyone time. No more than 3 clients will betaken per day. Adequate off street parking is available
in the three car driveway. I will be the only licensed therapist on the premises and will be the only employee on site.
My plan is to run a small family and friends based therapeutic massage business. I will not be advertising publicly.
Please contact me with further questions at 612-845-5992 or lisascholl _ comcast.net
Sincerely,
Lisa Scholl
Certified Massage Therapist
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes — May 24, 2017 DRAFT
Page 4
Commissioner Peterson asked why the applicant wants to wait until October 2017 to
record the Deed for Contract. Mr. Anderson stated property taxes are certifiable twice
per year, in May and in October. He added it would be financially difficult for the
applicants to make the two property tax payments so close together. He noted the
adjacent property would be affected by this as well.
Motion by Sims, seconded by Nemeth, to close the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. Motion
carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3 -absent vote (Kleven, Hudson, Koehler).
Motion by Nemeth to recommend approval of Res. No. . variance request for an
addition to an accessory structure that exceeds the total square footage land covered by
the foundation of the principal structure by 20 square feet, for Jill and Michael Huston,
16422 Hanson Boulevard NW.
The motion failed for lack of a second.
Commissioner Peterson stated City Code is generally restrictive with these types of
variances and the staff report includes a list of 4 criteria for consideration. He added he
has questions about the second and fourth criteria as outlined in the staff report: the
second criterion relates to circumstances unique to the property; and the fourth criterion
relates to economic considerations. He noted Anoka County acquired land for a right-of-
way, but it is unclear exactly when that happened. He noted he has questions about
proving economic hardship.
Commissioner Sims agreed, adding these criteria do not meet the threshold of what is
required for a variance.
Chairperson Daninger stated he concurs with Commissioners Peterson and Sims.
Motion by Peterson, and seconded by Sims, to recommend denial of the variance request
for an addition to an accessory structure for Jill and Michael Huston, 16422 Hanson
Boulevard NW, based on the second and fourth variance criteria as outlined in the staff
report, related to unique property circumstances; and, economic considerations. Motion
to deny carried on a 3 -ayes, 1 -nay (Nemeth), 3 -absent vote (Kleven, Hudson, Koehler).
Mr. Krumwiede stated that this item would be reviewed by the City Council at their June
6, 2017, Regular Meeting.
F
BLICHEARING: Conditional Use Permit —Massage Therapy Home Occupation —
824 Olive St. NW —Lisa Scholl.
City Planner Hanson reviewed the request of Lisa Scholl, 15824 Olive Street NW, for a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for an in-home massage therapy business. Therapeutic
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting DRAFT Minutes —May 24, 2017
Page 5
massage is a permitted Home Occupation as a conditional use in an R-4 Single Family -
Urban zoned district.
Ms. Hanson stated the applicant has been certified as a massage therapist for 14 years.
She added the proposed home massage therapy business will be in the basement of her
home, with access through the front door, and parking in the driveway. She noted no
more than three clients will be scheduled per day, between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and
after 10:00 p.m.
Ms. Hanson stated, in reviewing this case, the Commissioners should consider whether
the proposed home occupation would affect the health, safety and general welfare of the
neighborhood, traffic conditions, or property values. She noted City Staff have drafted a
Resolution with recommended conditions for the Commission's review and comment.
Commissioner Nemeth stated a massage therapy business is not a permitted home
occupation under City Code. Ms. Hanson stated it is permitted as a conditional use in the
R-4 Single Family -Urban District as a home occupation, and a CUP is required for this
reason.
Councilmember Nemeth stated the applicant has indicated she will not schedule more
than three clients per day. He asked whether on -street parking, if necessary, is allowed
by City Code. Ms. Hanson stated all home occupation -related parking must be contained
on the property, and in this case, in the driveway.
Motion by Sims, seconded by Peterson, to open the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. Motion
carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3 -absent vote (Kleven, Hudson, Koehler).
Lisa Scholl, 15824 Olive Street, stated she is the applicant.
Commissioner Nemeth asked whether Ms. Scholl would stagger her schedule so that
there is never more than 1 client on the property at the same time. Ms. Scholl confirmed
this, adding it will not be a daily business as she intends to schedule 10-12 clients per
month, and three clients in one day would not happen very often. She noted she needs to
plan to leave some changeover time in her schedule between clients.
Motion by Peterson, seconded by Nemeth, to close the public hearing at 7:40 p.m.
Motion carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3 -absent vote (Cleven, Hudson, Koehler).
Commissioner Nemeth asked whether the CUP remains with the property if it is sold.
Ms. Hanson confirmed the CUP runs with the property, but if the property were to be
sold and another massage therapy business were to be proposed, the new owner would be
required to obtain City Council approval and be fully licensed. She added the CUP
requirements would be the same.
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting DRAFT Minutes — May 24, 2017
Page 6
Commissioner Nemeth expressed concern that a bigger business with more customers
could cause disruption to the neighborhood. Ms. Hanson stated a condition could be
added to the Resolution that would restrict the number of allowable daily clients.
Motion by Peterson to recommend approval of Res. No. _, the request for a Conditional
Use Permit (CUP) for an in-home massage therapy business for Lisa Scholl, 15824 Olive
Street NW.
Motion failed for lack of a second.
Commissioner Sims stated he supports the addition of a condition to the resolution that
would restrict the number of allowable clients per day.
Commissioner Nemeth stated the applicant referred to three daily clients in her
application. He reiterated his concern that a property owner in the future might want to
have a bigger business, and as the CUP stays with the property, it would be prudent to
add a restriction on the number of allowable daily clients. He noted, however, he is
unsure whether three daily clients would be the appropriate number.
Commissioner Peterson stated three daily clients might be too restrictive. He added there
would not be a noticeable difference in neighborhood traffic if there are 3-5 daily clients.
Chairperson Daninger stated he agrees that five daily clients might be an acceptable
compromise.
Motion by Nemeth, seconded by Sims, to recommend approval of Res. No. _, request
for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for an in-home massage therapy business for Lisa
Scholl, 15824 Olive Street NW, with the addition of the following condition to the
Resolution:
4. No more than five clients per day will be scheduled.
Motion carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3 -absent vote (Cleven, Hudson, Koehler).
Ms. Hanson stated this application will be reviewed by the City Council at their June 6,
2017, Regular Meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit —Exterior Storage — 30I7 16ls` Ave.
NW— Eric Hicks
Community Development Director Janish reviewed a request for a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) for Eric Hicks, 3017 161St Avenue NW, to add exterior storage related to
their business, Upper Midwest Athletic Construction. This business is currently located
in Ramsey, but Mr. Hicks wants to move it to Andover.
CHAPTER 9
HOME OCCUPATIONS
SECTION:
City Code 12-9
Home Occupations
12-9-1:
Purpose
12-9- 2:
Permitted Home Occupations; Location Restrictions
12-9- 3:
Home Occupations In Accessory structures
12-9- 4:
Nonconforming Home Occupations
12-9- 5:
Conditional Use Permits
12-9- 6:
Special Home Occupation Permits
12-9- 7:
Inspections
12-9- 8:
In -Home Beauty Salons and Barbershops
12-9- 9:
Vested Rights
12-9-10:
Suspension Or Revocation Of Conditional Use Permit
12-9-11:
Illegal Home Occupations; Penalty
12-9-1: PURPOSE: The purpose of this chapter is to prevent competition
with business districts and to provide a means through the establishment of
specific standards and procedures by which home occupations can be conducted
in residential neighborhoods without jeopardizing the health, safety and general
welfare of the surrounding neighborhood. In addition, this chapter is intended to
provide a mechanism enabling the distinction between permitted home
occupations and nonconforming or customarily more sensitive home
occupations, so that nonconforming home occupations may be allowed through
an administrative process rather than a legislative hearing process. (Amended
Ord. 8, 10-21-1970)
12-9-2: PERMITTED HOME OCCUPATIONS; LOCATION
RESTRICTIONS: All home occupations that conform to all of the
following provisions maybe conducted entirely within the principal structure.
Home occupations shall not be conducted in a garage or accessory building
unless the property owner has obtained a Conditional Use Permit as stated in
Section 12-9-3 of this chapter or has obtained a Special Home Occupation
Permit as stated in Section 12-9-4.of this chapter. Home occupations may be
conducted by an individual who resides on. the property and uses the residence
as a primary address for legal purposes. (Amended Ord. 431, 10-15-13)
A. Permitted'Home Occupations Enumerated: Permitted home occupations
include, and are limited to: art or photo studio, dressmaking, secretarial
services, professional offices, repair services, or teaching services limited
to three (3) students at any one time and similar uses.
B. Number Of Employees: The number of employees shall be limited to
one person on site in. addition to family members. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-
21-1970)
C. Amount Of Building Space Used: The area within the principal structure
used by the home occupation shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of
the dwelling's livable floor area. Basements may be included if they meet
all State Building Code requirements. (Amended. Ord. 8, 10-21-1970;
amd. 2003 Code)
D. On Site Sales: On site sales shall be prohibited, except those clearly
incidental to services provided in the dwelling.
E. Dwelling Changes: Any interior or exterior alterations of a dwelling for a
home occupation shall be prohibited, except those customarily found in
a dwelling.
F. Vehicles: Vehicles associated with a home occupation shall be regulated
as stated in Title 12, Chapter 13, Performance Standards and in Title 6,
Motor Vehicle and Traffic. (Amended Ord. 392, 5/18/10)
G. Signs: Signs shall be regulated as stated in Title 12, Chapter 15.
i
H. Performance Standards: No home occupation shall produce light glare,
noise, odor or vibration that will in any way have an objectionable effect
upon adjacent or nearby property.
Supervision: The home occupation shall be conducted by at least one
member of the family who resides in the dwelling unit.
J. Building And Safety Requirements: The home occupation shall meet all
applicable fire.and building codes. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970)
12-9-3: HOME OCCUPATIONS IN ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
A. Conditional Use Permit Required: A Conditional Use Permit shall be
required for the following home occupations that are located in an
accessory structure or detached garage and/or require exterior storage:
1. Cabinet-making.
2. Woodworking.
3. Repair services,
4. Similar uses as those stated in Subsections Al through A3 of this
section.
B. Conditions Of Permit: These home occupations shall be subject to the
following conditions:
1. Lot Size: The size of the lot or parcel of land shall be three (3) acres or
larger.
2. Area Of Use: The combined square footage of the accessory structure
and/or outside storage area utilized by the home occupation shall not
exceed eight hundred (800) square feet.
3. Setbacks: Setbacks of the accessory building and outside storage area
shall be of a magnitude found necessary by the city, but in no case shall
there be less than a one hundred foot (100) front yard setback, thirty foot
(30') side yard setback and fifty foot (50') rear yard setback or as required
in Section 12-374 of this title.
4. Storage Restrictions: The outside storage area and all commercial
vehicles, materials and equipment for the business being stored on site
shall be fenced, landscaped and screened in such a manner as to prevent
them from being visible at any time of the year from road rights-of-way,
public properties and surrounding properties. (Amended Ord. 314 10-4-
2005)
5. Other Requirements: All provisions in Section 12-9-2 of this chapter.
(Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970)
6. Termination of Use Upon Sale of Property: Upon sale of the premises
for which the Conditional Use Permit is granted, such permit shall
terminate. (Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
12-9-4: NONCONFORMING HOME OCCUPATIONS:
Properties that had nonconforming home occupations prior to the adoption of this
title (May 15, 1990) were given an opportunity to apply for a Special Home
Occupation Permit. Those that were granted a permit are on file with the
Department of Community Development and may continue to operate. However,
they shall not increase in extent, number, volume, or scope from any of the
information stated in the permit, or the permit will be subject to revocation.
(Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
12-9-5: CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS: Conditional Use Permits granted
in Section 12-9-3 of this chapter shall follow the criteria established in Section 12-
14-6 of this title. These permits shall be valid for one year from the date of
issuance (unless otherwise specified in the resolution for approval) and thereafter
shall be automatically renewed each year unless objections or complaints are
received or the conditions of the permit are not adhered to. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-
21-1970)
12-9-6: SPECIAL HOME OCCUPATION PERMITS:
A. Temporary Permits: Nonconforming Home Occupation permits granted
by Section 12-9-4 of this chapter shall be temporary in nature, and
shall be granted to a designated person who resides at the address
where the home occupation is being conducted. (Amended Ord. 314,
10-4-2005)
B. Non -transferability Of Permit: These permits shall not run with the
land and shall not be transferable.
C. Renewal Of Permit: Special Home Occupation Permits shall be
automatically renewed each year unless objections or complaints are
received, or conditions of the permit are not adhered to.
D. Termination Of Permit: If the Special Home Occupation Permit holder
expires or moves to a new location, the existing permit shall automatically
terminate. In the case of death or other separation, the family member(s)
remaining at the same address may continue the home occupation if
written notice is given to the Department of Community Development and
authorization for the continuation of the permit is given with Council
approval. (Amended Ord. 314 10-4-05)
12-9-7: INSPECTIONS: There may be one annual inspection each year
made by the City Administrator or Administrator's designee of the property
covered by a Conditional Use Permit or Special Home Occupation Permit. In
addition, the City Administrator or the Administrator's designee shall, upon
reasonable request, enter and inspect the premises covered by said permit for
compliance purposes. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970)
12-9-8: IN HOME BEAUTY SALONS AND BARBERSHOPS:
In home beauty salons/barbershops shall be subject to the following:
A. Compliance with Title 3, Chapter 6 of the City Code.
B. Drawings Submitted: Drawings detailing the salon/shop shall be submitted
at the time of the request for the ConditionalUse Permit.
C. Compliance With State Requirements: The salon/shop must comply with
the State Cosmetology Board and the State Barbers Board requirements.
D. Number of Chairs: One chair salon/barber only.
E. Hours of Operation: The hours of operation shall be approved by the City
Council.
F. Parking: Parking requirements shall be as set out in section 12-13-10 of
this title.
G. Non-sewered Areas: In non-sewered areas, the septic system shall be in
compliance with Title 10, Chapter 4 of this code. A beauty shop/barber
shop shall be considered the equivalent to one bedroom in terms of usage
under Title 10, Chapter 4 of this code.
H. Termination of Use Upon Sale of Property: Upon sale of the premises for
Which the Conditional Use Permit is granted, such permit shall terminate.
(Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970, Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
12-9-9: VESTED RIGHTS: No home occupation allowed by Conditional
Use Permit or Special Home Occupation Permit shall confer upon any person or
to the benefit of any property owner any vested right. Rather, the use shall
remain subject to all conditions of the permit as established_ by the city. The city
may find it necessary from time to time to review the conditions of the permit as
they relate to the provisions of the general welfare of the community. (Amended.
Ord. 8, 10-21-1970)
12-9-10: SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT: When the City Council determines that the public interest
so requires, it may revoke or suspend the Conditional Use Permit of a home
occupation when it finds, after due investigation and a public hearing, that:
A. The permit holder, or any of his or her employees, has concealed
the receipt of stolen property or has knowingly received stolen
property.
B. The permit holder has not complied with the provisions of law
applicable to the premises, equipment or operation of the home
occupation.
C. The permit holder has obtained a permit.through fraud or misstatement.
D. The home occupation or activity is being conducted in a manner found to
be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the public or is
a nuisance, or is being operated or carried on in an unlawful manner.
E. The home occupation has not been operating or in business for a period
of six (6) consecutive months. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970)
12-9-11: ILLEGAL HOME OCCUPATIONS; PENALTY: All home
occupations that are being conducted in violation of this chapter are illegal. Any
person violating any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor
and, upon conviction thereof, shall be subject to punishment as defined by state
law. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970)
12-9-12: FARM WINERIES: The following provisions shall apply to all farm
wineries that are considered home occupations under the Conditional Use Permit
process:
A. Farm wineries which shall be allowed on 2'/z acre or larger parcels in the
R-1, R-2 and R-3 Zoning Districts.
B. Farm Wineries shall follow the standard building setbacks for the .
applicable Zoning District.
C. Whether conducted in a principal or accessory structure, a farm winery
shall not be operated as a retail store (i.e. no retail displays will be
allowed).
D. Farm wineries shall be allowed only six on-site customer sales per day.
All other sales will need to be made by the internet/telephone and mailed
or shipped to the buyer.
E. Farm wineries shall be subject to production limits on the amount of wine
produced on-site each year, as specified in the Conditional Use Permit.
Other Requirements including but not limited to: All provisions of Section
12-9-2 and 12-9-7 of this chapter.
G. Termination of Use Upon Sale of Property: Upon sale of the premises for
which the Conditional Use Permit is granted, such permit shall terminate.
(Amd. 2/:20/07, Ord. 339)
City Code 3-6
Massage Businesses and Services
CHAPTER
MASSAGE BUSINESSES AND SERVICES
SECTION:
3-6-1:
Purpose
3-6-2:
Findings
3-6-3:
Definitions
3-6-4:
Licenses Required; Exceptions
3-6-5:
Applications For Licenses: Issuance Or Denial
3-6-6:
Manager Required
3-6-7:
Licensee Rules, Regulations And Restrictions
3-6-8:
Off Site Massage Services
3-6-9:
Building Requirements
3-6-10:
Grounds For Denial, Revocation Or Suspension Of Licenses
3-6-11:
Violations; Penalties
3-6-1: PURPOSE: The purpose of this chapter is to prohibit massage
businesses and services to the public except those licensed as therapeutic
massage establishments and therapeutic massage therapists pursuant to this
chapter. The licensing regulations prescribed herein are necessary in order to
prevent criminal activity and to protect the health, safety and the general welfare
of the people of the city. The purpose of this chapter is not intended to impose
restrictions or limitations on the freedom of protected speech or expression.
(Amended Ord. 110, 8-1-1995)
3-6-2: FINDINGS: It is hereby found, for the following reasons, that within
the city there is a need to license therapeutic massage enterprises and therapists
and to prohibit all other types of massage businesses and services to the public:
(Amended Ord. 110, 8-1-1995; amd. 2003 Code)
A. Persons who have a bona fide and standardized training in therapeutic
massage, health and hygiene can provide a legitimate and necessary
service to the general public.
B. Health and sanitation regulations governing therapeutic massage
establishments and therapists can minimize the risk of the spread of
communicable diseases and can promote overall health and sanitation.
C. License qualifications for and restrictions on therapeutic massage
establishments and therapists can minimize the risk that such businesses
and persons will facilitate prostitution and other criminal activity in the
community.
D. Massage services provided by persons with no specialized and
standardized training in massage can endanger citizens by facilitating
the spread of communicable diseases, by exposing citizens to
unhealthy and unsanitary conditions, and by increasing the risk of
personal injury.
E. Massage businesses that employ persons with no specialized and
standardized training can tax city law enforcement services because such
businesses are more likely to be operated as fronts for prostitution and
other criminal activity than operations established by persons with
standardized training. (Amended Ord. 110, 8-1-1995)
3-6-3: DEFINITIONS: The following words and terms, when used in this
chapter, shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise:
CLEAN: The absence of dirt, grease, rubbish, garbage, and
other offensive, unsightly, or extraneous matter.
GOOD REPAIR: Free of corrosion, breaks, cracks, chips, pitting,
excessive wear and tear, leaks, obstructions, and
similar defects so as to constitute a good, sound
condition.
MASSAGE
THERAPIST: A person Who practices or performs -therapeutic
massage on a person for compensation and meets
the licensing requirements set forth in this chapter.
OFF-SITE
THERAPEUTIC
MASSAGE
SERVICES: Massage services conducted away from a licensed massage
establishment. Such off-site massage service locations shall
include, but not limited to, businesses and private homes.
ON-SITE
THERAPEUTIC
MASSAGE
SERVICES: Massage services conducted at a licensed massage
establishment. Such on-site massage service locations
shall include, but not be limited to, businesses and private
homes.
PERSON: Any individual, firm, association, partnership,
corporation, joint venture, or combination of
individuals.
THERAPEUTIC
MASSAGE:
The practice of applying pressure on, or friction against, or
the rubbing, stroking, kneading, tapping, or rolling of the
external parts of the human body with the hands or with the
aid of a mechanical or electrical apparatus, appliance, or
device with or without such supplementary aids as rubbing
(isopropyl) alcohol, liniment, antiseptic, oil, powder, cream,
lotion, ointment, or oth&sim lar preparation, for the
exclusive purpose of tension, stress, and pain relief,
relaxation, increased range of motion, muscle tone
improvement, physical. fitness, or beautification and for no
other purpose, by a person not licensed as a medical doctor,
chiropractor, osteopath, podiatrist, nurse, or physical
therapist, or an assistant who works solely under the
direction of any of the above described professionals, or
beautician and barber who confine their treatments to the
scalp, face, and neck.
THERAPEUTIC
MASSAGE
ESTABLISHMENT: An establishment in which the business of providing
therapeutic massage services (on-site and off-site) to
the public is carried on. (Amended Ord. 110, 8-1-1995;
amd. 2003 Code)
3-6-4: LICENSES REQUIRED; EXCEPTIONS:
A. Therapeutic Massage Establishment License: It shall be unlawful for any
person to directly or indirectly, upon any pretense or by any device,
engage in the business of keeping, conducting, or operating any
massage establishment within the city, which is open to the public or for
which any charge or fee is made, or any money or thing of value is
solicited or received, except a "therapeutic massage establishment" as
defined in Section 3-6-3 of this chapter, and then only after first obtaining
a duly issued license therefore from the city. A person who operates an
establishment described in this chapter without a valid license issued the
city shall be guilty of a misdemeanor offense.
B. Therapeutic Massage Therapist License: It shall be unlawful for any
individual to practice, administer, or provide massage services to the
public for consideration within the city without first having obtained a
Therapeutic Massage Therapist license. A person who practices,
administers, or provides massage services as described in this chapter
without a valid license issued by the city shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor offense.
C. Exceptions: A therapeutic massage establishment or therapist license is
not required for the following persons and places:
1. A health care facility licensed by the State of Minnesota.
2. A health care facility owned in whole or in part by the State of
Minnesota or any,of itsagencies.
3. A medical clinic or hospital, so long as the massage is performed by a
state licensed physician, chiropractor, osteopath, podiatrist, nurse,
physical therapist, or an assistant working under the direction of any of the
above described professionals.
4. A physical therapy clinic or athletic facility, so long as the massage is
performed by a state licensed physical therapist, athletic director, coach or
trainer.
5. A beauty parlor or barbershop located in a commercial or industrial
district, so long as the massage is performed by a state licensed
beautician or barber, and treatment is limited to the following:
a. Scalp, face, neck and shoulders, associated with a scalp
massage.
b. Hands to elbows, associated with a manicure.
c. Feet to knees, associated with a pedicure. (Amended Ord. 110,
8-1-1995)
3-6-5: APPLICATIONS FOR LICENSES; ISSUANCE OR DENIAL:
A. Therapeutic Massage Establishment:
1. Form: An application for a therapeutic massage establishment license
shall be made on a form supplied by the city. (Amended Ord. 110, 8-1-
1995)
r
2. Initial License: All initial applications shall be accompanied by a non-
returnable investigation fee in the amount as set forth by ordinance 1 .
Each application shall contain: (Amended Ord. 110, 8-1-1995; amd. 2003
Code)
a. The names, addresses, and dates of birth of the owners,
lessees, operators, and massage therapists of the proposed therapeutic
massage establishment.
b. A legal description and location of the premises.
C. Information as to the conviction of any crime or offense
committed by anyone listed on the application.
d. All applications by corporations shall include the names,
addresses, and dates of birth of all personsryhaving a beneficial interest
therein.
e. A description of services to be provided.
f. Such other information as the City Council may require.
3. Insurance: Each applicant for a license shall file with the city a public
liability insurance policy or certificate of insurance from a company
authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota, insuring the applicant
against any and all loss arising out of the use, operation, or maintenance
of the therapeutic massage establishment. The policy of insurance shall
be in limits of not less than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00).
Failure to keep in full force and effect the insurance required herein is
grounds for revocation.
4. Investigation Of Applicant: Prior to consideration of the application by
the City Council, an investigation shall be made by the Code Enforcement
Officer and the Building Official to determine compliance with this chapter
of all premises proposed to be licensed, and by the County Sheriff's
Department of all persons listed on the license application. (Amended Ord.
110, 8-1-1995)
5. Expiration Of License; Renewals: Each license shall expire on
December 31 of that year. Licenses must be renewed annually. The
renewal application shall be accompanied by an annual fee as set forth by
ordinancel. For a renewal, the applicant must provide full information, as
required for the initial licenses, for any new owners, lessees, operators, or
massage therapists proposed to be involved in the massage business,
and also provide any changes in the name, address, criminal record, or
other relevant information of any other owner, lessee, operator, or
See subsection 1-7-3A of this code.
See subsection 1-7-3A of this code.
massage therapist. The Code Enforcement Officer, Building Official,
and/or County Sheriff's Department may conduct an investigation prior to
any renewal.
B. Therapeutic Massage Therapist:
1. Form; Age Restriction: An application for a therapeutic massage therapist
license shall be made on a form supplied by the city. All applicants shall be at
least eighteen (18) years of age.
2. Initial License: All initial applications shall be accompanied by a non -returnable
investigation fee in the amount as set forth by ordinance. Each application shall
contain: (Amended Ord. 11,0, 8-1-1995; amd. 2003 Code)
a. The name, age and address of the applicant.
b. The length of experience in this occupation and the past places o
employment and positions held.
c. A description of any crime or other offense, including the time, place,
date, and disposition, for which the applicant has been arrested and convicted.
d. A statement as to whether the individual has had any license denied,
revoked, or suspended in the city or the State of Minnesota, the reason therefore,
and the business activity or occupation of the individual subsequent to such
suspension, revocation, or denial.
3. Educational Requirements: Each applicant for a Therapeutic Massage
Therapist license shall furnish with the application proof of graduating from a
school of therapeutic massage with a core curriculumof-at-leastfive hundred
(500) hours of in class, teacher supervised instruction of which no more than two
hundred (200) hours shall be clinical training.
4. Investigation Of Applicant; Issuance Or Denial Of License: A background
check from the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension shall be required prior to
issuance of a license. The license application shall thereafter be reviewed by the
City Clerk, County Sheriff's Department, and such other departments as shall be
deemed necessary. Such departments will thereafter submit their reports and
recommendations to the City Clerk, who will submit all of the reports and
recommendations to the City Council. The Council shall either grant or deny the
license. (Amended Ord. 110, 8-1-1995)
5. Expiration Of License; Renewals: Each license shall expire on December 31 of
that year. Licenses must be renewed annually. The renewal application shall be
accompanied by an annual fee as set forth by ordinance. The Code
Enforcement Officer, Building Official, and/or County Sheriff's Department may
conduct an investigation prior to any renewal. (Amended Ord. 110, 8-1-1995;
amd. 2003 Code)
3-6-6: MANAGER REQUIRED: Before a license is issued under this
chapter, the applicant shall designate in writing a natural person who is to be
manager and in responsible charge of the business, and upon whom service of
process may be made. Such person shall remain responsible for the conduct of
the business until another suitable person has been designated in writing by the
licensee. The licensee shall promptly notify the city and County Sheriff's
Department in writing of any change, indicating the name, address, and date of
birth of the new manager, and the effective date of such change. (Amended Ord.
110, 8-1-1995)
3-6-7: LICENSEE RULES, REGULATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS:
A. All massage therapist licensees shall:
1. Display Of License: Display current licenses in a prominent place at the
place of employment.
2. Hours Of Operation: Not allow the licensed premises to be open for
business or allow patrons to be on the premises between the hours of ten
o'clock (10:00) P.M. and seven o'clock (7:00) A.M.
3. Genitalia To Be Covered: Require that a person who is receiving a
massage shall have their genital areas covered with an appropriate
opaque covering. (Amended Ord. 110, 8-1-1995)
B. In addition to the above rules, regulations, and restrictions, the City
Council may, upon notice and hearing, promulgate such rules as he or
she deems necessary to carry out the provisions and purposes of this
chapter to protect.the public health, to provide for safe and sanitary
operation of licensed therapeutic massage establishments, to provide for
the safety of therapeutic massage establishments, to provide for the
safety of therapeutic massage and related massage equipment, and for
the proper training of persons employed in the operation of such
massage establishments. Notice of the promulgation of such rules, and
the hearing date shall be given to all licensees, and notice of the hearing
date published once in the legal newspaper of the city. The notice shall
advise that at the hearing, written or oral comments on proposed rules
will be received, and how a copy of the proposed rules can be obtained.
Such rules shall be effective after such hearing when filed in the office of
the City Clerk. Violation of such rules shall be sufficient grounds for
See subsection 1-7-3A of this code.
adverse action against licenses issued under this chapter. (Amended
Ord. 110, 8-1-1995)
3-6-8: OFF-SITE MASSAGE SERVICES:
A. Sanitation Requirements: All licensed massage therapists conducting
off-site massage services as permitted by the zoning ordinance shall
establish and maintain a supply storage facility containing any and all
materials used in conducting off-site massage services. The Code
Enforcement Officer, Building Official, and/or other city representatives
shall have the right to enter and inspect the storage facility at all
reasonable times. Rules as to required sanitation and storage shall be
adopted in accordance with this section.
B. Records Kept: All licensed massage therapists shall keep a record of all
off-site massage services performed. The record shall be legible, written in
inK or other mdeliule medium, or in a computerized format, and in the
English language. It shall include the name of the massage therapist, the
name of the person receiving massage services, the address where the
massage service was performed, and the date and time of such service.
The record shall be maintained for a period of two (2) years from the date
the massage service was performed. Such record shall be open for
inspection to the City Administrator or his/her authorized representative at
all reasonable times. (Amended Ord. 110, 8-1-1995; amd. 2003 Code)
3-6-9: BUILDING REQUIREMENTS:
A. Compliance With State Regulations: All persons who hereafter construct,
extensively remodel, or convert buildings or facilities for use as
therapeutic massage establishments which are open to the public, shall -
comply with the requirements of the State Building Code and all
amended codes. To the extent the building code or fire code does not
impose more restrictive requirements, the provisions of this chapter shall
govern.
B. Construction And Maintenance Requirements:
1. Floors, walls, and equipment in massage rooms, restrooms, bathrooms,
janitor's closet, hallways, and reception area used in conjunction therewith
must be kept in a state of good repair and clean at all times. Linens and
other materials shall be stored at least twelve inches (12") off the floor.
Clean towels and washcloths must be available for each customer.
2. If massage is performed in individual rooms, the doors to the individual
massage rooms shall not be equipped with locking devices and shall not
be blocked or obstructed from either side. (Amended Ord. 110, 8-1-1995)
3-6-10: GROUNDS FOR DENIAL, REVOCATION OR
SUSPENSION OF LICENSES:
A. It shall be grounds for denial of the application or for revocationor
suspension of the license if the applicant or licensee is not complying with
or has a history of violations of the laws and ordinances that apply to the
public health, safety, and morals.
B. It shall be grounds for the denial, revocation, or suspension of the
license: (Amended Ord. 110, 8-1-1995)
1. If the licensee is convicted of any violation reasonably related to the
licensed activity and/or occurring on the licensed premises, of any city
ordinance or Federal or State Statute. (Amended Ord. 110, 8-1-1995;
amd. 2003 Code)
2. If there is fraud or deception involved in the license application.
3. If the licensee is found to be in control or possession of any alcoholic
beverages or narcotic drugs or controlled substances on the premises for
which he or she is licensed to operate, possession of which is illegal as
defined in Minnesota statutes or city ordinances.
4. If the licensee has evidenced in the past willful..disregard for health
codes and regulations. - .
5. If the applicant fails to provide all the information and certificates
required by this chapter.
6. If the licensee shall refuse to permit any authorized police officers or
authorized members of the city to inspect the premises or operation.
7. If the licensee is found to be violating provisions of this chapter.
(Amended Ord. 110, 8-1-1995)
3-6-11: VIOLATIONS; PENALTIES: Every person who commits or
attempts to commit, conspires to commit, or aids or abets in the commission of
any act constituting a violation of this chapter, whether individually or in
connection with one or more persons, or as principal, or agent, or accessory,
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and every person who falsely, fraudulently,
forcibly, or willfully induces, causes, coerces, requires, permits, or directs another
to violate any of the provisions of this chapter is likewise guilty of a misdemeanor.
Each violation of this chapter shall constitute a separate offense. Conviction of a
violation of this chapter shall be grounds for suspension or revocation of any
license issued hereunder. (Amended Ord. 110, 8-1-1995)
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.CI.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: Joe Janish, Community Developm rector
Dan Krumwiede Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) — Exterior Storage, Upper Midwest Athletic
Construction — 3017 161'` Ave NW - Planning
DATE: June 6, 2017
INTRODUCTION
City Code 12-8-3 requires a CUP for exterior storage in all districts. The applicant is
proposing to place exterior storage at the property 3017 161" Ave NW related to their
business — Upper Midwest Athletic Construction. They are currently located in Ramsey but
want to move their business to Andover.
DISCUSSION
The company renovates outdoor athletic facilities. They primarily focus on the restoration of
tennis courts, running tracks, athletic equipment installation and site amenities. They will be
storing construction equipment at their site, which would include the following — Augers,
auger bits, bags of rubber on pallets, job site materials and trailers.
The use of property would fall under "Manufacturing" as described in City Code 12-2-2.
Manufacturing, Limited: Such uses include, but are not limited to, the following: lumberyard,
machine shops, products assembly, sheet metal shops, plastics, electronics, contractors' shops
and storage yards, food and nonalcoholic beverages, signs and displays, printing, publishing,
fabricated metal parts, appliances, clothing and textiles.
As part of this project, the applicant will need to go through the Commercial Site Plan (CSP)
process if City Council provides approval of this particular request. A Commercial Site Plan
process is conducted at the staff level and is reviewed by the Andover Review Committee
(ARC). A Commercial Site Plan includes information related to setbacks, grading, drainage,
erosion controls, tree protection, landscape plans, utility plans, and review of exterior
lighting.
Traffic
The addition of exterior storage is not expected to have a direct impact on the traffic
patterns for the property. The traffic would be expected even of the storage was located
within a structure.
Parking
The addition of exterior storage will not alter the parking requirements for the property.
Zoning
The property is zoned Industrial. Property to the West is zoned General Business
(commercial) and property to the North is zoned Industrial. Property to the East is
currently R-1 Single Family -Rural Residential; however, the property to the east is
guided in the City of Andover's Comprehensive Plan as Industrial.
Current Zoning:
Comprehensive Plan:
Screening
12-13-5 SCREENING
A. Exterior Storage: Screening from residential properties and public streets as
visible from ground level shall be provided with and architecturally compatible
opaque fence with a minimum height of six feet as measured from the surface of
the exterior storage area. Plant material shall be provided on the outside of the
fence for aesthetic appeal. Additional fence height and/or berming shall be
required if a six foot fence would not block direct vision of the exterior storage.
The applicant is proposing an opaque fence that will be reviewed as part of the
Commercial Site Plan process along with the proposed location of the fencing.
Review Criteria
12-14-6 B: Criteria for Granting Conditional Use Permits:
1. In granting a Conditional Use Permit, the City Council shall consider the advice
and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and:
a. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals, and general
welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
b. Existing and anticipated traffic conditions, including parking facilities on
adjacent streets and land.
c. The effect on values of property and scenic view in the surrounding area,
and the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan.
Public Comments
Staff received a phone call prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission holding the public
hearing from a nearby property owner asking general questions about the proposal. Staff s
takeaway from the phone call was the caller had potential concerns related to noise generated
from the property and the potential impact to traffic along 16155 Ave NW. The
Commissioners indicated the City has a noise ordinance that will need to be followed or
citations are possible.
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
On May 24, 2017 the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing regarding the
CUP request in which there was no public input. A draft of the meeting minutes have been
attached for your review. The Commission recommended approval on a 4-0 (3 absent) vote.
Commissioners Discussed:
The proposed storage had been revised to be 50 feet away from the eastern property
line vs. about 8 that had originally been shown. Commissioners noted this would
allow a bit more of a buffer to the property to the east now.
Commissioners started to discuss fencing locations and staff indicated the fence
location would be finalized as part of the commercial site plan process.
Commissioners questioned the location of the business today. Mr. Hicks indicated
this move will allow him to consolidate his office and equipment to one location.
ACTION REQUESTED
The City Council is requested to consider approval of the CUP for exterior storage at 3017
161" Ave NW.
Attachments
Resolution
Location Map
Photos
Applicant's Letter
Sketch of proposed exterior storage
Draft Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes 05.24.17
Re e tful s bm' ed,
Joe Janish
Community Development Director
Cc: Eric Hicks, 2618 178`h Lane NE, Ham Lake, MN 55304
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR EXTERIOR
STORAGE, LOCATED AT 3017 161sT AVE NW, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS:
That part of the E 461 ft of the WI/2 of NW 1/4 of section lying S of the N 2, 106.1 ft; ex rd; subject to
easement of record 3017 161' Ave NW Andover, MN 55304-0000
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a conditional use permit for exterior storage at the subject
property, and;
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a Public Hearing pursuant to the requirements of
City Code 12-14-8, and;
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said
request meets the criteria of City Code, and;
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the request would not have a detrimental effect
on the health, safety, and general welfare of the City of Andover, and;
WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the
Conditional Use Permit request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees
with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the conditional use
permit for exterior storage at 3017 161" Ave NW, subject to the following conditions:
1. Opaque fence or screening from residential property to the east.
2. Commercial site plan will be required.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 6th day of June, 2017.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Michelle Harmer, Deputy City Clerk
Julie Trude, Mayor
Location
I
Photo A
WOW
'/'
-C ��_ tea-
-�„`- - _.
., �� -_
a:.m W 4 t ,f6.
Photo D
May 3, 2017
s MIDWEST
r
LETiC
AUCTION
Serving Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Nebraska,
North Dakota and South Dakota
2618178`h Lane NE, Ham Lake, MN 55304
Phone 763-753-1127 Fax 763-753-3619
Email u_m_a_c@comcast.net
MN Contractors No: IR722325
IA Contractors No: C090307
Introduction
Upper Midwest Athletic Construction (UMAQ is a company that renovates outdoor athletic facilities. The company
primarily focuses on the restoration of tennis courts, running tracks, athletic equipment installation and site amenities. UMAC
specializes in new construction, scheduled maintenance through budgeting, or complete renovation of a deteriorating facility.
Products
Upper Midwest Athletic Construction provides a service in which we install various types of sports related athletic
equipment, surface new running tracks, and repair and re surface old tennis courts and running tracks that are no longer safe,
playable, or they are getting to the end of their usable life cycle. By completing repairs, we turn an old potential hazardous
surface, into a safe and playable athletic facility again.
We use the highest quality materials available on all our projects, whether they are new or existing. When resurfacing
an existing court, or surfacing a new court, the life cycle is approximately 6-8 years. In all but few cases, we can secure the
same sites we have completed projects in the previous cycle. We install a product that will extend the life cycle of a crack
repair from one year to up to ten or more years. The product we install for crack repairs is highly -sought after and very difficult
to install. This product is also difficult to obtain as you need to be trained in the proper installation procedure and own the
equipment necessary. UMAC's employees are all highly trained and certified to install it.
When surfacing a running track the life cycle can be 15-20 years with maintenance systems at 7-10 year increments.
We specialize in the two most common types of nmuing track surfacing: latex and polyurethane. This gives us the advantage
over our competitors who specialize in one or the other. It also offers the owner a broader price range to fit into a budget that
fits their needs.
Thank you,
Eric Hicks
Upper Midwest Athletic Construction
CEO/President
MOM
h Y Y
PUPS fes`'
CUP
J
Exterior
Storage j
r
Am
AA
Al
�tol'
T
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes — May 24, 2017
Page 6
Commissioner Nemeth expressed concern that a bigger business with more customers
could cause disruption to the neighborhood. Ms. Hanson stated a condition could be
added to the Resolution that would restrict the number of allowable daily clients.
Motion by Peterson to recommend approval of Res. No. _, the request for a Conditional
Use Permit (CUP) for an in-home massage therapy business for Lisa Scholl, 15824 Olive
Street NW.
Motion failed for lack of a second.
Commissioner Sims stated he supports the addition of a condition to the resolution that
would restrict the number of allowable clients per day.
Commissioner Nemeth stated the applicant referred to three daily clients in her
application. He reiterated his concern that a property owner in the fixture might want to
have a bigger business, and as the CUP stays with the property, it would be prudent to
add a restriction on the number of allowable daily clients. He noted, however, he is
unsure whether three daily clients would be the appropriate number.
Commissioner Peterson stated three daily clients might be too restrictive. He added there
would not be a noticeable difference in neighborhood traffic if there are 3-5 daily clients.
Chairperson Daninger stated he agrees that five daily clients might be an acceptable
compromise. DRAFT
Motion by Nemeth, seconded by Sims, to recommend approval of Res. No. _, request
for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for an in-home massage therapy business for Lisa
Scholl, 15824 Olive Street NW, with the addition of the following condition to the
Resolution:
4. No more than five clients per day will be scheduled.
Motion carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3 -absent vote (Cleven, Hudson, Koehler).
Ms. Hanson stated this application will be reviewed by the City Council at their June 6,
2017, Regular Meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit — Exterior Storage — 3017161St Ave.
NW — Eric Hicks
Community Development Director Janish reviewed a request for a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) for Eric Hicks, 3017 1615 Avenue NW, to add exterior storage related to
their business, Upper Midwest Athletic Construction. This business is currently located
in Ramsey, but Mr. Hicks wants to move it to Andover.
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes —May 24, 2017
Page 7
Mr. Janish stated a CUP is required for exterior storage in all Districts. He added the
company renovates outdoor athletic facilities, focusing on restoration of tennis courts,
running tracks, and other outdoor sports amenities. He noted construction equipment,
including augers, rubber on pallets, trailers and site materials, will be stored in the
proposed exterior storage area.
Mr. Janish stated the Commission should consider CUP criteria, including the effect of
the proposed storage area on the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood; existing
and anticipated parking and traffic; the effect on property values and views; and whether
the proposed use is in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Janish stated the proposed exterior storage area would be located 275 feet from the
pavement, with a 6 -foot opaque fence along the property line to the east. He added
screening is required by City Code for shared residential boundaries where a commercial
use is present. He noted the applicant was considering a split rail fence, but that
component is not included in the CUP.
Mr. Janish stated the applicant also proposes the addition of a perpendicular screen from
the opaque fence to the structure to screen the exterior storage area. Mr. Janish added the
applicant intends to clear some trees to make room for the exterior storage area if the
CUP is approved. He noted a commercial site plan review will be completed by City
Staff. DRAFT
Commissioner Nemeth stated the Commission's meeting packet does not include any
reference to the proposed fences. He asked why the Commission was not informed that
the opaque fence and split -rail fence were included in the CUP. Mr. Janish stated the
split -rail fence is not included in the CUP as it does not require a permit. He added the
opaque fencing is required by the Zoning Code to screen the exterior storage from the
residential property.
Commissioner Nemeth asked how many trees would be removed. Mr. Janish stated the
applicant intends to maintain as much natural screening as possible. He added tree
removal would be minimal, and only where it will be necessary to maneuver equipment.
Commissioner Nemeth asked whether it would be approximately a dozen trees. Mr.
Janish confirmed this.
Commissioner Nemeth stated the consideration regarding traffic impact is not included in
the Staff Report. Mr. Janish stated it is not expected that an area of additional storage
will increase or impact traffic. He added the proposed exterior storage area is a permitted
use with a CUP.
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes —May 24, 2017
Page 8
Commissioner Nemeth requested clarification regarding the amount of on-site parking.
Mr. Janish stated that will be reviewed as part of the commercial site plan process.
Commissioner Nemeth stated the Staff Report referred to a call received questioning
noise that could be generated at this site. He asked whether permitted hours of operation
will be enforced. Mr. Janish stated hours of operation could be specifically related to the
exterior storage area use, which would limit the owners access to their own property.
Commissioner Nemeth stated the Commission had discussed a noise complaint near
Target, and noise levels were measured and reviewed at that location. He added
observation of quiet hours is a City Code requirement.
Mr. Janish stated any noise complaint would be investigated by the Sherriff s office and
noise readings could be taken. He added a receiver is installed on the property line, and
decibels are recorded.
Commissioner Nemeth asked why the company is based in Ramsey but their mailing
address is Ham Lake. Mr. Janish stated that would be a question for the applicant. He
added the Andover site is currently being used minimally without the proposed exterior
storage area, and the company also has a facility in Ramsey.
Commissioner Peterson asked whether the split -rail fence is being added or removed, and
what a split -rail fence looks like. Mr. Janish stated that is not included in the CUP. He
added it is a rustic decorative fence that has not been installed but the applicant is
considering for the 161St Avenue property line. DRAFT
Commissioner Peterson asked whether the property will be screened from the street, as
referenced on Page 2 of the staff report. Mr. Janish stated that issue will be considered as
part of the commercial site plan review process.
Commissioner Peterson asked why the opaque fence is included in the CUP instead of the
commercial site plan review. Mr. Janish stated the site plan process has some flexibility
to ensure that all criteria are met, so the opaque fence can be reviewed now to ensure that
screening is sufficient. He added he would recommend an additional condition to the
Resolution indicating that additional fencing could be required.
Commissioner Nemeth asked whether the 8 -foot set back from property line is
appropriate for a storage area. Mr. Janish stated the setback requirement was revised to
increase the setback, and the applicant has reduced the size of the exterior storage area to
increase its distance from the property line approximately 50 feet.
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes — May 24, 2017
Page 9
Commissioner Nemeth stated this change was not included in the meeting packet. Mr.
Janish stated the proposed change was submitted after the meeting packets were
distributed.
Commissioner Nemeth requested clarification about the amended setback requirement.
Mr. Janish stated there would be approximately 50 feet from the property line to the edge
of the exterior storage area.
Motion by Peterson, seconded by Sims, to open the public hearing at 8:09 p.m. Motion
carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3 -absent vote (Cleven, Hudson, Koehler).
Eric Hicks, 3017 - 16151 Avenue NW, stated he is the applicant. AFT
Commissioner Nemeth asked whether the business is currently located in Ramsey, and
why the business letterhead has a Ham Lake address. Mr. Hicks stated there was a
change in ownership, and the business was previously located in Ham Lake. He added he
has been running the business, including equipment storage, from his home in Ramsey.
Commissioner Nemeth asked why the applicant wishes to move from Ramsey to
Andover. Mr. Hicks stated the Andover property is closer to his home, and the homes of
his employees. He added the business has outgrown the residential property in Ramsey.
Chairperson Daninger asked whether the applicant has an idea of hours of operation and
potential noise impact to the neighborhood. He urged the applicant to be cognizant of the
residential neighbors. Mr. Hicks stated his employees will be receiving and loading
supplies and equipment in the morning, around 6:30 a.m. or 7:00 a.m. He added the crew
returns at the end of the work day and parks the equipment.
Motion by Nemeth, seconded by Sims, to close the public hearing at 8:12 p.m. Motion
carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3 -absent vote (Cleven, Hudson, Koehler).
Commissioner Nemeth reiterated that he was surprised that, after studying the case and
reviewing guidelines for setbacks from residential properties, no information was
provided for the Commission prior to the meeting. He asked why the information was
not included in the packet. Mr. Janish stated the amended setback information was
received by City Staff after the meeting packets had been prepared.
Commissioner Nemeth requested that, in the future, such last-minute information should
be emailed to the Commission before the meeting, or a hard copy should be provided at
the meeting. Mr. Janish agreed.
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes —May 24, 2017
Page 10
Chairperson Daninger stated he is comfortable with this CUP request as the commercial
site plan will address any other issues. He added he is supportive of encouraging new
businesses in Andover.
Commissioner Nemeth requested clarification regarding opaque fencing. Mr. Janish
stated it is a chain link fence with solid material slats running through it.
Commissioner Nemeth stated there are commercial fences along Hanson and Round Lake
Boulevards that require maintenance. He added he would prefer the use of some type of
fencing material that is easy to maintain as it gets older.
Mr. Janish stated the permit can be brought forward for review and revocation if the
applicant is in violation of the requirements of the CUP. DRAFT
Commissioner Peterson stated he is comfortable with opaque fence as described, if it is
not along the property line at 161St Avenue.
Motion by Janish, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of Res. No.
approving a Conditional Use Permit for Eric Hicks, 3017 161" Avenue NW, for exterior
storage space related to his business, Upper Midwest Athletic Construction. Motion
carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3 -absent vote (Cleven, Hudson, Koehler).
City Planner Hanson stated that this item would be reviewed by the City Council at their
June 6, 2017 Regular Meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING: Rezoning of Rural Reserve Residential District.
City Planner Hanson reviewed plans to rezone lands designated as Rural Reserve from R-
1 — Single Family Rural to RR -Rural Reserve Residential. This proposed rezoning of the
RR -Rural Reserve coincides with the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and
Zoning Text Amendment that the Commission and City Council had previously
reviewed.
Ms. Hanson stated the rezoning process includes the official adoption of the zoning map.
She added the area in question was identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan, adopted
in 2008, for future urban development if municipal services were available.
Ms. Hanson stated the current Comprehensive Plan has a minimum lot split of 1 home
per 20 acres. She added, in March 2017, a request for a Comprehensive Plan amendment
was received by an applicant who wished to further subdivide residential property to 1
home per 10 acres. She noted this request was approved by the City Council and is
currently being reviewed by the Metropolitan Council, which has indicated that the
request will be approved.
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and City Councilmembers
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: Joe Janish, Community Developm irector
SUBJECT: Consider - City Code Amendments to Title 12 Zoning Regulations and
Title 13 Planning and Development - Planning
DATE: June 6, 2017
INTRODUCTION
At the October 25, 2016 City Council work session, City Council discussed a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) request by Jake and Jon Packer to allow the
subdivision of land within the Rural Reserve District into parcels smaller than what is
currently allowed in the Comprehensive Plan. City Council provided direction to staff to
proceed with a CPA and ordinance to address future development within the rural
reserve area.
Since October 25, 2016 the Planning Commission and City Council have approved a
Comprehensive Plan amendment to address for higher density and further subdivision
of property within the Rural Reserve District which has been forwarded to the
Metropolitan Council.
The Metropolitan Council Community Development Committee will discuss the CPA at
the June 5, 2017 meeting and the Metropolitan Council Board will make a determination
on June 14, 2017. Staff expects that the Metropolitan Council will approve the CPA, as
it is in alignment with the Metropolitan Councils Policies. Staff is proposing to continue
to hold a hearing and make a recommendation contingent upon the Metropolitan
Council approval.
Due to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, we are now amending the City Code to
be consistent with the plan, and will also need to rezone certain property to also be
consistent with the CPA.
The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on May 9, 2017. The Ordinance the
Planning Commission is recommending to the City Council is attached for review as
DRAFT A.
The City Council held a worksession on May 23, 2017 to discuss the recommended
ordinance and provided some direction to staff and the ordinance with changes is also
attached for review as DRAFT B.
DISCUSSION
Both ordinances provide the base information that has been utilized for the Rural
Reserve area over the years. The difference between what has been regulated in the
past to today, is related to the way in which the property can be split and the number of
units permitted.
The zoning text amendment should only be noticeable when landowners attempt to split
their property. Both ordinances would allow for property owners to have up to 1 unit per
10 acres vs. the historical requirement of 1 unit per 20 acres. Each ordinance then
specifies the requirements of the splitting process and when a split would require a
public hearing and the process in which the proposed split would be reviewed.
ORDINANCE A - (DRAFT A)
• Public Hearing is required for all splits
• Andover Review Committee (ARC) review
• Planning Commission review (public hearing)
• City Council review
• No "ghost platting"
• Development Agreement when lots under 10 acres are created
ORDINANCE B - (DRAFTS
• Public Hearing is required for splits that create a parcel under 10 acres in size or
when construction of public infrastructure is needed (i.e. roadways)
• Andover Review Committee (ARC) review for lots 10 acres or larger only when
public infrastructure (i.e. roadways) is not needed as part of the development
• No "ghost platting"
• Development Agreement when lots under 10 acres are created
Ordinance Overview
Staff has proposed adding a new section to Title 13 while modifying the existing
section. This creates a 1A (original language with some modification) and 1B
(proposed splits in the Rural Reserve). The creation of two "1's" will allow for
individuals to continue to split land as they do currently in other areas of the city and
1B will apply to property within the Rural Reserve area. As proposed by the
Planning Commission (DRAFT A) an administrative lot split is not an option for land
owners, all splits will be done through a public hearing process
DRAFT B would allow for administrative splits that would be reviewed by ARC.
These splits would not be able to create lots under 10 acres in size and would not be
able to involve new roadways or public infrastructure.
Staff has also included language under the review process indicating:
13-113-6: REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. If a parcel contains more than 35 acres and is described by the
rectangular survey system as a quarter, quarter section at the time of
adoption of this ordinance then that quarter, quarter is eligible for 4
units.
B. A parcel greater than 35 acres and described by the rectangular
survey system as a quarter, quarter section, may be split into 4 equal
parts and shall not be required to restrict future development.
Section A = Clarifies that a "short 40's" would still be permitted to have 4 units
provided that the 40 acres is still described as a quarter, quarter such as NEI/4
of SE 1/4.
Section B = Clarifies that in cases of "short 40" the property owner is allowed to
create parcels that will be slightly smaller than 10 acres, but will not have to
provide for a temporary development agreement.
Information Needed
Reviewing our current Lot Split Application, many of the items that are included in
the draft ordinance are listed as required items in the application. The ordinance
allows for the use of "public" information on the remnant parcels (parcels that do not
expect to have homes on them). This in theory should help to keep costs down for
applicants that desire to split property within the Rural Reserve, yet still provide
enough detail for the city to perform an appropriate review.
Met Council Flexible Residential Development Ordinance Guidelines
According to the Met Council the need to restrict future development on
properties is required as part of the comprehensive plan. According to
Metropolitan Council's Flexible Residential Development Ordinance Guidelines
for the Diversified Rural Area (August 2008, page 2):
4. Require that the parcel(s) set aside for future urbanization be
covered by a temporary development agreement or deed restriction,
rather than a permanent conservation easement or other permanent
restriction.
In a typical open space development, with the purpose of long-term
preservation of natural resources, communities usually ensure the long-
term maintenance and protection of sensitive natural resources through
the placement of a conservation easement that is often conveyed to a
trust or public entity. When seeking to reserve land for future
development, however, the community should not place permanent
restrictions on the capability of the land to be developed. Instead,
communities should place on the future urbanization parcel temporary
development agreements or deed restrictions that contain "triggers" for the
removal of such restrictions. The restrictions prevent the land from being
developed before urban services are available. The ordinance should also
detail the "triggers," or conditions, under which such restrictions would be
removed and the parcel made available for development. Such conditions
may include the rezoning of the parcel, change in the comprehensive plan,
and the provision of urban infrastructure and utilities, among others
deemed appropriate by the local unit of government.
Over the last several months discussions have included blanket easements,
temporary development agreement or lot tracking as "tools" to handle splitting of
property within the Rural Reserve area.
Currently both options this evening (DRAFT A and DRAFT B) includes language
that a Development Agreement would be utilized for a split that results in a lot
less than 10 acres in size. The temporary development agreement could provide
the flexibility for the city and developer/property owner.
Lot tracking would require staff to provide an "in-house" process that would allow
staff to track the number of splits and remaining splits for each parcel within the
Rural Reserve area. This could be established through electronic means and
physically track the number of lots created through the splitting process.
Through the tracking process staff would monitor the splits to avoid the
inconsistency of the comprehensive plan and verifies the density as established
in the comprehensive plan.
Ghost Platting
According to Metropolitan Council staff, when 75% of the land is not preserved
for urban development, ghost platting should be utilized in order to prevent
issues with future extension of city utilities and roadways.
DRAFT A
The Planning Commission's recommendation removes the language of the
sketch plan due to the use of the Temporary Development Agreement, and the
fact the lot split submittal will be reviewed by ARC, Planning Commission and
City Council based on the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission
stated that it would be up to the applicant to determine if they would want a
sketch plan to maximize the value of the land; however, for future roadways and
utility extensions ARC, Planning Commission and City Council would be
reviewing the requests and watching out for future improvements.
DRAFT B
This version of the ordinance also does not require ghost platting to occur. The
thought is that the split will be reviewed by ARC in all cases comparing the split
to the Comprehensive Plan and studies. In cases that either public infrastructure
is built (i.e. roadways) or lots less than 10 acres are created then a public hearing
will be required and not only will ARC review requests but the Planning
Commission and City Council will as well.
Zoning District
Staff is clarifying the zoning regulations within the Rural Reserve. This
information is similar to R-1 Single Family -Rural with the exception of a 5 -acre
minimum lot size required in the proposed district vs. 2.5 acre minimum in R-1.
ACTION REQUIRED
Staff recommends the City Council review the two (2) proposed zoning text
amendments and consider adoption of DRAFT A or DRAFT B.
Res ctf y ub fitted,
Joe apish
Community Development Director
Attachments:
Met Council Residential Development Ordinance Guidelines
Proposed Ordinance DRAFT A
Proposed Ordinance DRAFT B
Andover City Council Meeting Minutes March 21, 2017
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes March 28, 2017
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes April 25, 2017
Andover Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 9, 2017
Draft City Council Worksession Minutes May 23, 2017 (to be distributed separately)
Draft Sample Easement — This would be customized for each request
Draft Sample Development Agreement — This would be customized for each request
Draft Zoning Map
Met Council Residential Development
it Metropolitan Council Ordinance Guidelines
Flexible Residential Development Ordinance Guidelines
for the Diversified Rural Area
August 2008
Background
The 2030 Regional Development Framework (RDF)' indicates that land use patterns in Diversified Rural Area
Communities "include a mix of a limited amount of large -lot residential and clustered housing with agriculture
and other uses" (RDF p. 27). The RDF further states the communities in the Diversified Rural Area should
preserve areas where post -2030 growth can be provided with cost-effective and efficient urban infrastructure and
accommodate growth without prematurely requiring the provision of regional urban services. In addition, the
2030 Water Resources Management Policy Plan (WRMPP) identifies areas for post -2030 wastewater investment
and service. These areas are described in the text of the document as well as illustrated in Appendix E on a map
titled Regional Wastewater System Long -Term Service Areas.
The existing regional wastewater treatment plants and the broader infrastructure efficiency of contiguous sewered
development are predicated on a residential density" of three units per acre or greater (WRMPP p. 54). The
Council's planning strategies for Diversified Rural Areas call for communities in those areas to have land use
plans that "[a]ccomodate growth not to exceed forecasts and clustered development not to exceed 1 unit per 10
acres" (RDF p. 32). However, the results of a recent study of "flexible residential development ordinances"
employed in Diversified Rural Area communities show that some communities have implemented ordinances that
permit activities that are in conflict with metropolitan system plans."' Density bonuses, large -lot development, and
open space preservation ordinances sometimes permit residential development at densities that will severely limit
the ability of some communities to achieve (in the future) the minimum density requirement of at least three units
per net developable residential acre that is necessary for future cost-effective and efficient regional wastewater
treatment services.
The Council has developed guidelines for flexible residential development ordinances applied in communities in
the Diversified Rural Area and identified as a Long -Term Service Area (LTSA) for regional wastewater services.
These areas are essentially staging areas for future urbanization, and so development ordinances and land use
patterns should reflect as much and not preclude future development on appropriate lands in those areas. A
purpose of flexible residential development ordinances in these areas should be to preserve land for post -2030
growth and to accommodate the future extension of regional urban services.
Communities should study and assess their landscapes to refine their development priorities. There may be areas
within the community that contain an abundance of sensitive natural resources or that the community has
identified as a greenway or conservation corridor. These areas may not be most suitable for future urbanization as
the capability of the land to support development is low and constrained. In these cases, open space development
or cluster development may be adapted to protect those resources to meet the community's goals.
These guidelines are not intended to replace the work that has been done by numerous communities and
organizations in developing flexible development ordinances. Rather, these guidelines are intended to be used
along with those methods and standards for the varying types of flexible development ordinances.
Guidelines for Flexible Residential Development Ordinances'"
Areas immediately beyond the current urban services boundary within the LTSA are considered temporarily rural.
Residential development ordinances in these areas should limit densities to one unit per 10 acres, or allow the
clustering of dwellings in a manner that will reserve land for future sewered development, in addition to
protecting any sensitive resources that may exist. Ordinances providing for residential clustering in the above-
described areas should take the following guidelines in consideration when developing or adapting flexible
residential ordinances for these areas.
I. Provide a purpose within the ordinance that describes the need to reserve land resources for efficient
future urbanization when appropriate infrastructure is available to support that development.
Defining the purpose and intent of any ordinance provides the local unit of government with a basis for the
regulations that follow. Clearly stating that a purpose of the flexible residential development ordinance is to
reserve land resources for future development will allow potential applicants to better understand the
regulations as they apply to individual properties. The local unit of government may also wish to apply
aspects of an open space ordinance to other areas within the community that have different characteristics that
they wish to set aside or protect; this distinction should also be stated and defined within the purpose section
of the ordinance.
2. Describe the characteristics of the land required for future urbanization and seek to reserve tracts of
land in a size and configuration capable of supporting future development (for example, non -hydric
soils, location in relation to existing development, etc.).
The ordinance should define the lands that are considered "buildable," as these lands are considered the most
suitable for development. Removing lands that are restricted due to federal and state regulations, as well as
any features that the local government has defined for protection or conservation, will allow the community to
preserve sensitive natural features and to ensure the availability of land to accommodate future development.
Density bonuses are commonly used by local communities as a means to encourage developers to use a non -
conventional development ordinance. However, without specifying the types of lands that are required for
future development, many communities have inadvertently encouraged large -lot development in which the
private lots often consume most of the developable land and leave little remaining developable acreage
available for future development. The lots within the development are often too large to efficiently extend
urban -level services to the development.
3. Allow no more than 25% of the developable land in a project to be developed. For the purposes of
future urbanization, larger future urbanization parcels should be reserved, limiting the cluster to a
development area that a covers a minority of the area.
To ensure that land is available for future development, the local unit of government should specify the
maximum amount of developable land that is allowed to be used for the initial residential development. For
the purposes of future urbanization, communities should limit the initial development envelope to no more
than 25% of the total buildable area of the project parcel.
4. Require that the parcel(s) set aside for future urbanization be covered by a temporary development
agreement or deed restriction, rather than a permanent conservation easement or other permanent
restriction.
In a typical open space development, with the purpose of long-term preservation of natural resources,
communities usually ensure the long-term maintenance and protection of sensitive natural resources through
the placement of a permanent conservation easement that is often conveyed to a trust or public entity. when
seeking to reserve land for future development, however, the community should not place permanent
restrictions on the capability of the land to be developed. Instead, communities should place on the future
urbanization parcel temporary development agreements or deed restrictions that contain "triggers" for the
removal of such restrictions. The restrictions prevent the land from being developed before urban services are
available. The ordinance should also detail the "triggers," or conditions, under which such restrictions would
be removed and the parcel made available for development. Such conditions may include the rezoning of the
parcel, a change in the comprehensive plan, and the provision of urban infrastructure and utilities, among
others deemed appropriate by the local unit of government.
Page 2
Portions of the development that are designated as undevelopable or are to be set aside for recreational use or
conservation purposes, on the other hand, should be either dedicated to the public or covered with a
permanent conservation easement or permanent deed restriction.
5. Provide for the rezoning of the future urbanization parcel to a residential zoning classification at
densities consistent with Council policy at such time that urban services are available to the parcel.
To ensure the efficient utilization of urban services, communities should allow for the rezoning of the future
urbanization parcel to densities that, at a minimum, are consistent with Council policy. This rezoning should
only occur in conjunction with or after the provision of urban services, when the land is served by the
infrastructure required to support higher density uses.
6. Encourage the use of community wastewater treatment systems to serve the temporary cluster and to
allow for smaller lot sizes within the development.
Clustering homes on smaller lots facilitates the connection of those homes to future sewer services and
ensures that these services are being efficiently and economically utilized. These small lot sizes, however, are
often too small to provide the necessary space for individual sewage treatment systems on each lot, in
addition to a back-up site in case of primary system failure. Using a community treatment system resolves
that issue: by employing a shared drainfeld located in a common open space area, individual lots no longer
need to be large enough to accommodate two on-site septic treatment sites. The use of smaller lot sizes will
not only facilitate future connection to sewer services, once they become available, but also will reserve more
developable land for future development.
' This memorandum references the online versions of the 2030 Regional Development Framework (as amended through December 14,
2006), the 2030 Water Resources Management Policy Plan (with revised forecasts as of January 9, 2008), and the Local Planning
Handbook.
" The Council defines "residential density" as the "number of dwelling units per net residential acre of land" (wRMpP p. 111). For
planning proposes, the Council uses a standard calculation of net developable acres and net density to measure a community's capacity to
accommodate residential development.
The minimum density requirement is three units per net developable residential acre. Net residential acreage is calculated by
subtracting from gross acres wetlands and water bodies, public parks and open spaces, arterial road right-of-way, and natural
and other resources mapped and protected by local ordinances and in the comprehensive plan update. (Local Planning
Handbook p. 3-5)
Under Minnesota Statutes sections 473.858, subdivision 1 and 473.865, subdivision 2, a local governmental unit cannot adopt any
official control of fiscal device which is in conflict with its local comprehensive plans `or which permits activity in conflict with
metropolitan system plans." Official controls are:
ordinances and rules which control the physical development of a city, county, or town, or any part thereof or any detail thereof
and implement the general objectives of the comprehensive plan. Official controls may include ordinances establishing zoning,
subdivision controls, site plan regulations, sanitary codes, building codes, and official maps. (Minn. Stat. § 473.852, subd. 9)
The "metropolitan system plans" are the "transportation portion of the Metropolitan Development Guide, the policy plans, and
capital budgets for metropolitan wastewater service, transportation, and regional recreation open space." (Minn. Stat. § 473.852,
subd. 8)
" Minn. Stat. § 473.854 authorizes the Council to "prepare and adopt guidelines and procedures relating to the requirements of sections
462.355, 473.175, and 473.851 to 473.871 [the Metropolitan Land Planning Act] which will provide assistance to local governmental units
in accomplishing the provisions of [the Act]."
Page 3
DRAFT A
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. XX
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
CITY CODE TITLE 12 ZONING REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 3
ZONING DISTRICTS AND NIAP
SECTION:
12-3-1:
Purpose Of Zoning Districts
12-3-2:
Zoning Districts Established
12-3-3:
Purpose Of Each District
12-3-4:
Zoning District Map
12-3-5:
Minimum District Provisions
12-3-2: ZONING DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED: For the purpose of this title, the
city is hereby divided into the following zoning districts:
Symbol Name
RR
Single Family Rural Reserve
R-1
Single Family Rural Residential
R-2
Single Family Residential Estate
R-3
Single Family Suburban Residential
R-4
Single Family Urban Residential
R-5
Manufactured Housing
M-1
Multiple Dwelling Medium Density
M-2
Multiple Dwelling
AgP
Agricultural Preserve
GR
General Recreation
LB
Limited Business
NB
Neighborhood Business
uc"21 ".
SC Shopping Center
GB General Business
Industrial
CLR Closed Landfill Restricted
12-3-3: PURPOSE OF EACH DISTRICT:
A. RR Single Familv Rural Reserve Rural Reserve District is approximately one
thousand acres in size to accommodate future urban growth beyond the
previously planned Municipal Urban Service Area. This area is designated as an
area of which is restricted from urban development until a master plan has been
approved and municipal sewer and water can be constructed to serve the area
The city prohibits lot splits and subdivisions of less than one parcel per ten acres
to prevent this area from rural residential development that would preclude
orderly MUSA expansion However, there are opportunities to allow for rural
reserve lot splits of 5 acres minimum in situations which ensure that the majority
of the residual land be preserved for future economical urban development as
long as the provisions of the city codes are met The intent of the ordinance is
to allow subdivision of land while preserving residual land for future economical
urban development.
R-1 Single Family Rural Residential:
1. This district is intended to provide a residential atmosphere for those persons
desiring to retain a large parcel of land. Such large lots are logical in areas where
development into smaller lots would be difficult, or where public utilities will not
be available in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, larger houses are more
costly and require larger lots. Thus, to provide an area to accommodate those
persons with the financial means to erect a large house, it is necessary to have
an area of large lots.
2. Land which is wooded, or which has a changing topography, and low land
which tends to be poor agriculturally is also the most expensive to develop for
residential sites and, after development, the sites tend to be expensive to
maintain. Such areas are the most interesting and most susceptible to large lot
development. The district also is intended to preserve productive land for
agricultural use. (Amended Ord. 314, 10-4-05)
B. R-2 Single Family Residential Estate: This district is intended to provide a
residential atmosphere for those persons desiring a single-family neighborhood
with a suburban density. Lots in this district created after 1978 and without City
sewer and water must be at least 2.5 acres. This zoning district was used for
rural residential developments prior to 1978. No existing properties may be
rezoned to R-2. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970; amd. 2003 Code, Amended Ord.
314 10-4-2005)
DRAFT A
C. R-3 Single Family Suburban Residential: This particular district is intended to
satisfy those persons who prefer a medium sized lot. Lots in this district created
after 1978 and without City sewer and water must be at least 2.5 acres. This
zoning district was used for rural residential developments created before 1978.
No existing properties may be rezoned to R-3. (Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
D. R-4 Single Family Urban Residential: This district represents urban density use
by single-family detached dwellings. (Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
E. R-5 Manufactured Housing District: This district would permit all types of
manufactured housing including manufactured homes and modular houses,
provided public sewer and water is provided. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970)
F. M-1 Multiple Dwelling Medium Density: This district is intended to provide a
location for medium density attached dwelling units (townhouses) with private
entrances. These areas may be transitional, however, the townhouse resident
should have convenient access to all facilities provided for single-family
neighborhoods. This district's location shall provide sufficient space for buffering
from less intense uses. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970; amd. 2003 Code,
Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
G. M-2 Multiple Dwelling District: This district is intended to provide a location for all
types of multiple dwellings. This district's location shall have convenient access
to all facilities provided for neighborhoods, open space, and buffering from less
intense uses. Access to an M-2 district shall be from a collector or arterial
roadway. (Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
H. GR General Recreation District: This district is intended to provide a location for
all types of commercial recreation uses such as golf driving ranges, outdoor
theaters, racetracks, and snowmobile areas, most of which require large
amounts of land and good separation from residential areas. This district's
location shall provide sufficient space for buffering from less intense uses.
(Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
LB Limited Business District: This district is suitable only for commercial uses of
a limited (less intense) nature. This may be due to the close proximity of
residential uses. The LB district can be used as a transitional district or buffer
between non -compatible uses such as intense commercial (GB) and low density
residential uses. (Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
J. NB Neighborhood Business District: This district is used for retail sales and
DRAFT A
services in such scale as to serve the surrounding neighborhood needs.
Locations for Neighborhood Business districts are typically small plots in close
proximity to or surrounded by residential areas. NB zoning districts do not
require frontage on an arterial roadway and can be served by local and collector
streets. However, this district shall not be served exclusively by local streets.
This district's location shall provide sufficient space for buffering from less
intense uses. (Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
K. SC Shopping Center District: This zoning classification is reserved for modern
retail shopping facilities of integrated design in appropriate locations. Locations
for the SC district are larger plots that can accommodate more intensive retail
development. Access shall be available from arterial roadways. This district's
location shall provide sufficient space for buffering from less intense uses.
(Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
L. GB General Business District: These are areas containing a wide variety of
business uses including retail, service and semi -industrial. As such, they may
contain businesses that tend to serve other business and industry as well as
those catering to shopper needs.
M. I Industrial District: These are areas that have the prerequisites for industrial
development, but because of proximity to residential areas or the need to protect
certain areas or uses from adverse influences, high development standards will
be necessary. I district uses include service industries and industries which
manufacture, fabricate, assemble or store, where the process is not likely to
create offensive noise, vibrations, dust, heat, smoke, odor, glare or other
objectionable influences. Generally, those include wholesale, service and light
industries that are dependent upon raw materials refined elsewhere. An industrial
"park" which maintains high development standards would be zoned I. This
district's location shall provide sufficient space for buffering from less intense
uses. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970, Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
N. CLR Closed Landfill Restricted: This district is intended to apply to former
landfills and adjacent lands which are managed under the Closed Landfill
Program of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPGA). The purpose of the
district is to limit uses of land both actively filled and related lands, to minimal
uses in order to protect the land from human activity where response action
systems are in place. This district shall only apply to the former landfill and
pertinent adjacent lands (the limits of which are defined by the MPCA). This
district shall apply whether the landfill is in public (State, MPCA, County, City,
Township), Indian tribal, or private owners.
DRAFT A
12.3.5: MINIMIM DISTRICT PROVISIONS
RR
R-1
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-51
M-1
M-2
AgP
GR
LB
NB
SC
GB
I
Lot area per dwelling unit
(square feet)
1 -family homes
5 to 10
acres
2.5
acres
2.5
acres
2.5
acres
11,400
5,500
1 -family homes (lots
created before 10/17178)
1 acre
20,000
Single-family twin homes
6,000
5,000
Single-family attached
6,000
5,000
Apartments (lot area per
unit in square feet)
1 -bedroom units
4,000
2 -bedroom units
5,000
Floor area per dwelling unit
(square feet) See Floor
area definition for two story
homes
1 -family homes
960
960
1,200
960
960
960
960
Single-family twin homes
960
960
Single-family attached
960
960
1 -bedroom apartment units
700
Each additional apartment
bedroom (plus)
150
Lot dimensions
RR
R-1
R-2
R-3
R•4
R-5+
M-1
M-2
AgP
GR
LB
NB
SC
GB
I
Lot width -front setback line
(feet)
300
300
300
300
80
150
150
300
120
100
150
200
100
100
Lot width (lots created
before 10/17/78)
165
100
Lot width (feet)
1,320
Lot depth (feet)
150
150
150
150
130
150
150
135
135
150
150
150
150
Minimum garage size
440
440
440
440
440
220+1
220+1
220+1
440
(square feet)
prk spc
prk spc
prk spc
Lot dimensions
RR
R-1
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-51
M-1
M-2
AgP
GR
LB
NB
SC
GB
I
(continued)
Nonresidential lot area
10
5acres
1acre
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
40
20,000
20,000
22,500
30,000
20,000
24,000
(acres or square feet)
acres
sf
sf
sf
sf
acres
sf
sf
sf
sf
sf
sf
Minimum district size
2 acres
5 acres
Principal structure height
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
45
45
45
(maximum) subject to City
Code 12-3-5 B.6
Land coverage (maximum
20
20
20
30
30
20
30
30
Up to 40
Up to 40
Up to 40
Up to 40
Up to 50
percent of structures)
Building setbacks?
RR
R-1
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-51
M-1
M-2
AgP
GR
LB
NB
SC
GB
I
Any yard setback from
50
50
50
50
40
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
county road subject to City
Code 12-5-47
Front yard setback (feet)
40
40
40
35
352
30
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
Side yard principal
10
10
10
10
10
20
30
10
104
104
104
104
104
structure setback from
interior lot linea
Side yard setback from
40
40
40
35
355
30
30
40
30
30
30
30
30
30
property line adjacent to
street
Attached residential
6
garage (over 20 feet wide)
from interior lot line
Rear yard setback
50
50
50
30
30
30
30
30
25
25
25
25
25
Rear yard setback for any
40
40
40
35
35
residential structure from
prop. line adjacent to street
Notes: 1. Allowed by Planned Unit Development only.
2. Unless existing structures would indicate a lesser setback to maintain uniformity.
3. An additional 5 -foot setback shall be added when plans for the principal structure accommodate an access for a deck.
4. See Section 12-5-3 of this title for setback adjacent to residential areas.
DRAFT A
5. 25 feet if it is a back-to-back lot.
6. See City Code 12-13 for exceptions allowed as a Conditional Use
7. See also City Code 12-5-4 when less than minimum required right-of-way exists
All setback measurements are from property lines.
(Ord. 273, 9-2-2003; amd. Ord. 274, 9-2-2003; amd. Ord. 314,10-4-2005; Ord. 403,12-21-10; Amended Ord. 423,10-16-12)
DRAFT A
DRAFT A
CHAPTER
FENCES AND WALLS
12-7-3: FENCE HEIGHT:
A. In the rear and side yards Up to the front fagade of the principal structure, fences
up to a height of six (6) feet are allowed. (Amended Ord. 386, 8/5/09)
B. Fences located closer to the front property line than the principal structure, shall
not exceed four (4) feet in height. In the RR Single -Family Rural Reserve, R-1
Single -Family Rural Residential and R-2 Single -Family Estate zoning districts,
"ornamental fences", as defined in Section 12-2-2 of this title, of up to six (6) feet
in height are permitted in all yards, provided the fence does not encroach upon
the Clear View Triangle as defined in Section 12-2-2 of this code. (Amended
Ord. 386, 8/5/09)
CHAPTER 9
HOME OCCUPATIONS
12-9-12: FARM WINERIES: The following provisions shall apply to all farm
wineries that are considered home occupations under the Conditional Use Permit
process:
Farm wineries which shall be allowed on 2'/z acre or larger parcels in the RR, R-1, R-2
and R-3 Zoning Districts.
Chapter 12
RESIDENTIAL
PERMITTED, PERMITTED ACCESSORY, CONDITIONAL, INTERIM AND PROHIBITED USES,
P -Permitted Use R-1 Single Famil -Rural
M-2 Multiple Dwelling
PA- Permitted Accessory Use R-2 Single Family -Estate
RRSinele Family Ruml Reserve
C- Conditional Use SEE Foo MMS R-3 Single Family- Suburban
X- Prohibited Use R4 Single Family- Urban
PUD- Planned Unit Development R-5 Manufactured Homan
I -Interim Use M-1 Multiple Dwelling- Low
Density
If Use Not Specifically Listed or Provided for Elsewhere in the City Code, It Is Prohibited
RR
R -t
R-2
R-3
R4 s R-5
M-]
M-2
WImIS
Animal Therapy Facility -on properties larger than five acres in size
C
C
C
C
X
X
X
X
Commercial animal training (2.5 acre minimum residential lot size)
C
C
C
C
X
X
X
X
Commercial riding stables
C
C
X
X
X
X
X
X
Dog kennel license - Private (2.5 acre minimum lot size required) in
compliance with City Code 54A
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Dog kennel license - Commercial (minimum 2.5 acre lot size) in compliance
with City Code 5-1A
C
C
C
C
C
C
X
X
Domestic animals in compliance with City Code Title 5
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
Farm animals up to 5 per acre, plus one additional farm animal per acre
above 5 acres on residential properties 5 acres or greater up to a maximum of
20 animals and definition under City Code 12-2
P
P
P
P
X
X
X
X
Farm animals greater than allowed as a permitted use on residential properties
5 acres or greater in compliance with City Code Title 5° and definition under
City Code 12-2
C
C
C
C
X
X
X
X
Feedlots, except Anoka Independent Grain and Feed Inc. which is a permitted
use that predates the adoption of this ordinance.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pleasuretrecreation animals on residential properties at least 2.5 acres in size
in compliance with City Code Title 5 and definition under City Code 12-2
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
X
X
X
Poultry on residential properties with neither municipal sewer or water in
compliance with City Code Title 5 and definition under Cit Code 12-2
P
P
P
P
X
X
X
X
Dwellm>:s
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
C
C
X
X
X
X
X
X
Manufactured homes and modular homes, provided they are developed under
a planned unit development and the complex is a minimum of twenty (20)
acres in size
X
X
X
X
X
PUD
X
X
Multiple dwellings
X
X
X
X
X
X
PUD
PUD
Relocated dwelling units in compliance with City Code 9-11
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Single-family residential buildings (detached)
P
P
P
P
P
PUD
PUD
PUD
Single-family residential buildings (attached) and townhouses
X
X
X
X
X
X
PUD
PUD
Temporary Family Health Care Facility
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Two-family home conversions (splits) in compliance with City Code 12-8-1
X
X
X
X
X
X
C
C
Home Occn ationc
Home occupations within principal structure in compliance with City Code
12-9
PA
PPA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
Home occupations in accessory structure on a parcel of land three (3) acres or
larger utilizing an accessory structure and/or exterior storage in compliance
with City Code 12-9
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Barbershops and beauty salons
C
C
C
C
C
C
C I
C
P -Permitted Use R-1- Single Family -Rural M-2- Multiple Dwelling
Bed and breakfast
C
C
C C
C
C
X
X
Permitted- Permitted Accessorv. Conditions], Interim and Prohibited Uses
Boarders or roomers, up to two persons, by a resident family, with no private
R-1 R-2 R-3' R-4'
RR
R-5
M-1
M-2
cookingfacilities
PA
PA
PA PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
P
Cabinet making(wood working (home occupation) in compliance with City
C
C
X
C
C
X
X
X
Code 12-9
Group Homes as regulated by State Statute
X
X
X
X
X
P
Commercial greenhouse
C
C
C C
X
X
X
X
PA
Daycare Centers- Home Occupation (12 or fewer children)
C
P
P P
P
P
P
P
C
Daycare Centers -Home Occupation (13 or more children)
P
C
C C
C
C
C
C
P -Permitted Use R-1- Single Family -Rural M-2- Multiple Dwelling
PA- Permitted Accessory Use R-2- Single Family- Estate RR Single Famil Rural Reserve
C- Conditions] Use' ssE Foo'mo'rss R-3- Single Family- Suburban
X- Prohibited Use R4- Single Family- Urban
PUD- Planned Unit Development R -S- Manufactured Housing
I -Interim Use M-1- Multiple Dwelling- Low
Density
If Use Not Specifically Listed or Provided for Elsewhere in the City Code, It Is Prohibited
Permitted- Permitted Accessorv. Conditions], Interim and Prohibited Uses
R-1 R-2 R-3' R-4'
RR
R-5
M-1
M-2
Daycare Facility -Group Family
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Farm Wineries (subject to City Code 12-9-12)
PA
PA
C
C
X
X
X
X
Group Homes as regulated by State Statute
C
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
Office in compliance with City Code 12-9
C
C
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
Therapeutic massage establishment (as a home occupation offering on site
massae services) as regulated by chapter 9 of this title and title 3, chapter 6
P
P
C
C
C
C
C
C
$Chools
K-12 Schools
P
P
P
P
P
P
X
X
Post -secondary Schools
1'A
PA
C
C
C
C
X
X
Schools exceeding height maximum up to 45 feet in height
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Subordinate Classroom Structures (when located on a licensed Primary
and/or Secondary school property)
C
C
I
I
I
I
I
I
Subordinate Classroom Structures (when located on a property where there is
a church as the principal use)
P
P
I
I
I
I
1
I
tiliti c
Private utilities (gas, electric, phone, cable, etc) in Compliance with City
Code 8-2
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Private utility structures and/or uses (electrical transmission lines, gas
pipelines, etc.)
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Public utility uses for local services
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
other
Agricultural uses- rural (outside MUSA bound only)
P
P
P
P
X
X
X
X
Agricultural uses- urban
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Antennas in excess of thirty-five feet (35') in height in compliance with City
Code 9-12
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Buildings (Principal) exceeding height maximum subject to City Code 12-3-5
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Bulk fuel storage (tanks greater than 1,000 gallon storage capacity) in
compliance with City Code 12-8-5
C
C
X
X
X
X
X
X
Cam ounds, clubs and ranges, archeryranges, racetracks
C
C
X
X
X
X
X
X
Cemeteries
P
P
C
C
C
C
C
C
Churches
C
C
C I
C
C
C I
X I
X
III
Clubs and lodges
C
C
C I
C
C
C
C
C
Crafts and antique businesses in buildings designated as historical sites by a
count state or national) recognized historical organization
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
C
Garages and Accessory Structures in compliance with City Code 12-6
PA
PA
PAI
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
Golf courses and driving ranges
C
C
C I
C
C
C
C
C
Highway construction materials (temporary rocessin and storage)
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
1
Marinas
C
C
C I
C
C
C
C
C
Publicly owned and operated property except as herein amended
P
P
P I
P
P
P
P
P
Resorts
C
C
C I
C
X
X
X
X
Solar Energy Systems(ground mounted) subject to City Code 9-15
PA
PA
X I
X
X
X
X
X
Solar Energy Systems (roof mounted) subject to City Code 9-15
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
Swimming pools and recreation areas or structures
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
Uses which may be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Wind Energy Conversion Systems (WECS)-as defined in and in compliance
with Title 9, Chapter 13 of this code. WECS are rohibited on WDE site.
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
(Amended Ord. 8,10-21-1970; amd. Ord. 81J111J, 7-18-2002; Ord. 8000000, 8-5-2002; Ord.8000QQQ, 10-1-2002; Ord.
8RRRRRR, 10-1-
2002; amd. Ord. 8AAAAAAA, 4-15-2003; amd. 2003 Code; amd. Ord. 314 10-4-2005; amd. Ord. 385 7-21-09; amd. Ord.
388 10-20-09; amd. Ord. 3903-16-10; amd. Ord. 397 8-17-10; Amid. Ord. 404,1-18-11; Amd. Ord. 436,41-15-14; Amd. Ord.
463,6-21-16
I Conditional use permits for was not listed herein shall not be granted except where the city council determines that said uses are
similar in character to those listed herein. Within any of the following districts, no land or structure shall be used for the
following uses by districts except by conditional use permit and in accordance with the criteria as stated in subsection 12-15-6D
of this title.
2 Private sewer and water systems shall only be permitted on every other lot, or no more frequently than one private system for
each forty thousand (40,000) square feet where large lots are established. This shall not apply to lots of record at the time this
title is adopted. On each new plat, the lots are to be developed in accordance with this chapter and shall be so designated.
3 Private sewer and water systems shall only be permitted to replace systems on existing lots when municipal sewer and
water is not available. (Amended Ord. 314, 10-4-2005)
4 Provided a minimum of twenty five thousand (25,000) square feet of retail Floor space is constructed, except as otherwise
approved as part of a
Planned Unit Development.
5 Loading berths prohibited in the LB district.
6 After a minimum of two thousand (2,000) square feet of retail floor space is constructed, provided the site is two (2) acres or
larger.
7 See subsection 13-24 of this code for permitted, conditional, and prohibited uses in the AgP district.
8 Farm operations in existence on April 18, 2006 are exempt from this provision. See also City Code 124-4.
9 Sec 12-2-2 for definitions of "Continuous Operation and Non -continuous Operation'. (Amended Ord. 421, 10-2.12)
10 From November 15th to January Ist continuous operation will be allowed in the General Business and Industrial Zoning District.
(Amended Ord.
424, 11-7-12)
fir.
DRAFT A
CHAPTER 13
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
12-13-21: RESIDENTIAL BUILDING STANDARDS: All permitted residential
structures in RR R-1, R-2, R-3, and R-4 zoning districts shall meet the following design
criteria:
A. All structures shall have permanent concrete or treated wood foundations that
will anchor the structure, which comply with the State Building Code as adopted
in Section 9-1-1 of this code and which are solid for the complete circumference
of the house. Except, four -season porches may be constructed without the
permanent foundation, provided the porch does not exceed a maximum
coverage of twenty percent (20%) of the footprint of the habitable portion of the
principal structure.
B. Sixty percent (60%) of a residential structure shall have a minimum width of
twenty-four feet (24'). Width measurements shall not take into account overhangs
or other projections. Such width requirement shall be in addition to the minimum
area per dwelling requirements of Section 12-3-5 of this title.
C. Single-family dwellings other than approved earth sheltered homes shall have at
least a 4:12 roof pitch and shall be covered with shingles or tiles. This
requirement shall not apply to three -season porches, four -season porches,
greenhouses and solariums, provided they meet the State Building Code and are
approved by the Building Official.
D. All single-family dwellings shall have roof overhangs that extend a minimum of
one foot (1') from all the walls of the structure unless the style of the house
dictates otherwise and said plan is approved by the Building Official prior to any
permits being granted.
E. All single-family structures must be built in conformance with Minnesota
statutes sections 327.31 to 327.35 or the State Building Code as adopted in
Section 9-1-1 of this code.
F. Any metal siding upon single-family residential structures shall have horizontal
edges and overlapping sections no wider than twelve inches (12"). Sheet metal
siding shall not be permitted in such districts.
G. All exterior construction, including finish and the final grading, shall be completed
in accordance with plans and specifications within one year following date of
permit issuance. All existing buildings not meeting the provisions of this title shall
See also title 9, chapter 1 of this code.
comply within one year following adoption of this title. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-
1970; amd. 2003 Code)
111039MMINI
10 -111110.
•n-W
TITLE 13
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Subject
Chapter
Splitting Lots, Parcels Or Tracts Of Land Generally. 1A
S littinq Lots, Parcels Or Tracts Of Land Within
Rural Reserve.................................................1 B
Agricultural Preservation............................................2
Planned Unit Development (PUD) .............................3
Shoreland Management.............................................4
Bluffland And Riverland Development ....................... 5
Buffer Strips And Standards For Protection
Of Wetlands And Storm Water Ponds.......................6
CHAPTER 1
SPLITTING LOTS, PARCELS OR TRACTS OF LAND GENERALLY
SECTION:
13-1A -1:
Definition
13-1A -2:
Minimum Lot Requirements
13-1A -3:
Frequency Of Splitting Lots
13-1A -4:
Application For Lot Split
13-1A -5:
Fees
13-1A -6:
Review And Recommendations
13-1A -7:
Variances
13-1A -8:
Compliance With Provisions
13-1A -9:
Application And Term Of Provisions; Conflicts
13-1A -10:
Enforcement And Penalty
13-1A-1: DEFINITION: A "lot split' is any division of a lot, parcel, or tract of
land into not more than two (2) parcels when both divided parcels meet or
exceed the minimum requirements for platted lots in the applicable zoning
district. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977)
13-1A-2: MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS: No lot, parcel or tract of land
shall be divided unless the resultant lots have at least the minimum width, depth
and square footage as required for any parcel of land in the zoning district
wherein the lot is located. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977)
13-1A-3: FREQUENCY OF SPLITTING LOTS: No owner may utilize this
method of land division on any parcel more than one time in any three (3) year
period. A three (3) year waiting period for a lot split is required on all lots, parcels
or tracts from the date they were created by previous lot splits under this chapter.
(Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977)
A. Exceptions. A lot split may be applied for within the three (3) year waiting
period provided the following conditions are met:
1. The property owner has owned the property for more than five years.
2. A one year waiting period shall be required between splits.
3. A maximum of three lots shall be created including the original lot.
4. City infrastructure and utilities such as sanitary sewer, storm sewer,
water main and streets are in place.
5. Grading, drainage and erosion control plans shall be prepared that
properly address how drainage will be handled on the site as well as
DRAFT A
the affect on adjacent properties to the satisfaction of the City.
(Amended 431, 10-15-13)
13-1A-4: APPLICATION FOR LOT SPLIT: The applicant shall provide the
following information:
A. The scale and north direction.
B. Dimensions of the property.
C. Names and locations of adjacent streets.
D. Location of existing buildings on and within one hundred feet (100') of
subject property.
E. Current zoning and legal description.
Sufficient proof that the lot has not been split within the last three (3)
years.
• -:7R.T.IT-T.t�r:S�i7T-'flhLi�LrSi7T7.
#G. Such other information as may be required to fully represent the
intent of the lot split. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977)
13-1A-5: FEES:
A. There shall be a single charge as set forth by ordinance plus
consultant's fees, if any, for a lot split application'.
B. Where parkland was dedicated or a park fee paid at the time the original
parcel was created, there shall be no park fee assessed or land
dedicated at the time of the lot split application. If no park fees have
been assessed nor land dedicated as above, the fee, as set forth by
ordinance for each lot created under this chapter, may be assessed for
park fees2. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977; amd. 2003 Code)
13-1A-6: REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. Planning And Zoning Commission Review: The proposed lot split shall first
be presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its review and
recommendation. Such recommendations shall consider land uses, traffic
control, zoning regulation, future developments, and conformance with the
' See subsection 1-7-31-1 of this code.
2 See subsection 1-7-3G of this code.
comprehensive development plan, and any other criteria deemed pertinent
by the Planning and Zoning Commission. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977)
B. Notice To Adjacent Property Owners: Upon receipt of an application for a
lot split, the Community Development Director shall notify by mail all
property owners within three hundred fifty feet (350') of the property of the
date of the review of such lot split. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977; amd.
2003 Code)
C. Planning And Zoning Commission Recommendation To City Council: The
division of a lot may be recommended for approval; provided that such
split is in conformance with the City Comprehensive Plan, does not
interfere with orderly planning, is not contrary to the public interest and
does not nullify the intent of this chapter.
D. City Council Action:
1. Following review and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning
Commission, the request for a lot split shall be placed on the agenda of
the City Council in the following manner:
a. Recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting held on the second Tuesday shall be placed on the
agenda of the City Council at the first Tuesday meeting of the
following month.
b. Recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting held on the fourth Tuesday shall be placed on the agenda
of the City Council at the third Tuesday meeting of the following
month, unless there are five (5) Tuesdays in the given month from
which the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission
is made, in which case, the recommendation shall be placed on the
agenda of the City Council at the first Tuesday meeting of the
following month.
2. Within sixty (60) days following receipt of the proposed lot split from the
Planning and Zoning Commission, the Council shall approve or
disapprove by resolution. If approved, a certified copy of the resolution
approving the lot split shall be forwarded to the petitioner.
E. Record Of Lot Split: The lot split, together with a certified copy of
the resolution, shall thereafter be filed with the County Recorder's
office.
DR 1:I' A
F. Time Limit On Implementing Lot Split: If the City Council determines that
the conditions of approval are not met within twelve (12) months, the lot
split will be null and void. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977)
13-1A-7: VARIANCES: Variances from the requirements of this title, Title
11: Subdivision Regulations, and Title 12: Zoning Regulations, may be granted
by the City Council as provided in City Code 12-14-7, except that any variance
request shall be made as a part of the lot split approval process. (Amended Ord.
407, 6-21-11)
13-1A-8: COMPLIANCE WITH PROVISIONS:
A. The effect of this chapter shall not work to preclude compliance with
utilities hookup, payment of levied and pending assessments, and
performance of any other requirements of the ordinances of the city.
B. The owner, or agent of owner, of any parcel shall not divide any lot or
parcel for the purpose of sale, transfer, or lease with the intent of evading
the provisions of this chapter.
C. The owner, or agent of owner, of any parcel shall not sell or otherwise
convey said parcel with the intent of evading the provisions of this chapter
or circumventing attempts to plat acreage or otherwise subdivide tracts of
land within the city. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977)
13-1A-9: APPLICATION AND TERM OF PROVISIONS; CONFLICTS:
A. This chapter shall apply to and govern the entire city during the period for
which it is in effect. This chapter, during its effective period, shall replace
and supersede provisions in all other ordinances and regulations
applicable to the city which are in conflict or inconsistent with the
provisions herein. All ordinances and provisions therein which are not in
conflict with the terms and conditions of this chapter shall continue in full
force and effect.
13-1A-10: ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTY: Any person, firm or corporation
violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor
and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as defined by state law. The lot
as
MUM
wrMEMMMUMMEM
13-1A-9: APPLICATION AND TERM OF PROVISIONS; CONFLICTS:
A. This chapter shall apply to and govern the entire city during the period for
which it is in effect. This chapter, during its effective period, shall replace
and supersede provisions in all other ordinances and regulations
applicable to the city which are in conflict or inconsistent with the
provisions herein. All ordinances and provisions therein which are not in
conflict with the terms and conditions of this chapter shall continue in full
force and effect.
13-1A-10: ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTY: Any person, firm or corporation
violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor
and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as defined by state law. The lot
splitting not in accordance with the requirements of this chapter may be enforced
by mandamus, injunction, or any other appropriate remedy in any court of
competent jurisdiction. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977)
DRAFT A
DRAFT A
CHAPTER 1B
SPLITTING LOTS, PARCELS OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE RURAL
RESERVE DISTRICT
SECTION:
13-113-1:
Definition
13-1B-2:
Minimum Lot Requirements
13-1 B-3:
Frequency Of Splitting Lots
13-1 B-4:
Application For Lot Split
13-1 B-5:
Fees
13-1 B-6:
Review And Recommendations
13-1 B-7:
Variances
13-1 B-8:
Compliance With Provisions
13-1B-9:
Application And Term Of Provisions; Conflicts
13-1 B-10:
Enforcement And Penalty
13-113-1: DEFINITION: A 'lot split' is any division of a lot, parcel, or tract of
land into more than four (4) parcels when both divided parcels meet or exceed
the minimum requirements for platted lots in the applicable zoning district.
13-1 B-2: MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS: No lot, parcel or tract of land
shall be divided unless the resultant lots have at least the minimum width, depth
and square footage as required for any parcel of land in the zoning district
wherein the lot is located.
13-1 B-3: FREQUENCY OF SPLITTING LOTS: No owner may utilize this
method of land division on any parcel more than one time in any three (3) year
period. A three (3) year waiting period for a lot split is required on all lots, parcels
or tracts from the date they were created by previous lot splits under this chapter.
A. Exceptions. A lot split may be applied for within the three (3) year waiting
period provided the following conditions are met:
1. The property owner has owned the property for more than five years.
2. A one year waiting period shall be required between splits.
3. A maximum of three lots shall be created including the original lot.
4. City infrastructure and utilities such as sanitary sewer, storm sewer,
water main and streets are in place.
5. Grading, drainage and erosion control plans shall be prepared that
properly address how drainage will be handled on the site as well as
the affect on adjacent properties to the satisfaction of the City.
(Amended 431, 10-15-13)
DRAFT A
DRAFT A
13-1 B-4: APPLICATION FOR LOT SPLIT: The applicant shall provide the
following information:
A. The scale and north direction.
B. Dimensions of the property.
C. Names and locations of adjacent streets.
D. Location of existing buildings on and within one hundred feet (100') of
subject property.
E. Current zoning and legal description.
F. Sufficient proof that the lot has not been split within the last three (3)
years.
G. Floodplain shall be identified if applicable within the lot(s) proposed to
have a home. An overlay may be used on the remnant parcel.
H. Existing topography shall be shown along with proposed grading of the
site (if necessary). Light Detection And Ranging (LIDAR) contour
information may be used for the remnant parcel.
Wetland delineation for the lot(s) that intend to have homes located on
them. National Wetland Information (NWI) is acceptable for the remnant
parcel.
J. When a lot split results in a lot less than 10 acres in size, the applicant
shall restrict future development of homes through a development
agreement until defined "triggers" are met such as urban services are
available, rezoning of said parcel to a higher density, change in the
comprehensive plan to a zoning district that would allow higher density,
among other "triggers" as may be deemed appropriate by the City Council
on the remnant parcel.
K. Proof of sewerability for lots proposed to have home(s).
L. Geotechnical Report. A standard geotechnical report with a history and
recommendations regarding the sites. In addition, the report shall include
SCS soil types, mottled soil elevations or highest anticipated water table,
existing groundwater elevation, and soil borings to a minimum depth of 20
feet for the lots proposed to have homes on them.
M. Other information may be required to fully represent the intent of the lot
split.
13-1B-5: FEES:
DRAFT A
iT:7�Ti1I1
A. There shall be a single charge as set forth by ordinance plus
consultant's fees, if any, for a lot split application'.
B. Where parkland was dedicated or a park fee paid at the time the original
parcel was created, there shall be no park fee assessed or land
dedicated at the time of the lot split application. If no park fees have
been assessed nor land dedicated as above, the fee, as set forth by
ordinance for each lot created under this chapter, may be assessed for
park fees2.
13-1 B-6: REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. If a parcel is greater than 35 acres and is described by the rectangular
survey system as a quarter, quarter section, at the time of adoption of this
ordinance then that quarter, quarter is eligible for 4 units.
B. A parcel greater than 35 acres and described by the rectangular survey
system as a quarter, quarter section, may be split into 4 equal parts anc
shall not be required to restrict future development.
C. Andover Review Committee (ARC): The proposed lot split shall first be
reviewed by ARC. The applicant shall make modifications based upon
ARC's comments and then resubmit for consideration at a Public Hearing
for Planning and Zoning.
D. Notice To Adjacent Property Owners: Upon receipt of a completed
application for a lot split, the Community Development Director shall notify
by mail all property owners within three hundred fifty feet (350') of the
property of the date of the public hearing at the Planning Commission of
such lot split.
E. Planning And Zoning Commission Review: The Planning and Zoning
Commission for its review and recommendation shall conduct a public
hearing. Such recommendations shall consider land uses, traffic control,
zoning regulation, future developments, and conformance with the
comprehensive development plan, and any other criteria deemed pertinent
by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
D. Planning And Zoning Commission Recommendation To City Council: The
Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing and provide for a
recommendation to the City Council. The division of a lot may be
recommended for approval; provided that such split is in conformance with
the City Comprehensive Plan, does not interfere with orderly planning, is
' See subsection 1-7-3H of this code.
2 See subsection 1-7-3G of this code.
not contrary to the public interest and does not nullify the intent of this
chapter.
E. City Council Action:
1. Following review and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning
Commission, the request for a lot split shall be placed on the agenda of
the City Council in the following manner:
a. Recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting held on the second Tuesday shall be placed on the
agenda of the City Council at the first Tuesday meeting of the
following month.
b. Recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting held on the fourth Tuesday shall be placed on the agenda
of the City Council at the third Tuesday meeting of the following
month, unless there are five (5) Tuesdays in the given month from
which the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission
is made, in which case, the recommendation shall be placed on the
agenda of the City Council at the first Tuesday meeting of the
following month.
2. Within sixty (60) days following receipt of the proposed lot split from the
Planning and Zoning Commission, the Council shall approve or
disapprove by resolution. If approved, a certified copy of the resolution
approving the lot split shall be forwarded to the petitioner.
F. Record Of Lot Split: The lot split, any deed restrictions required,
any easements required, together with a certified copy of the
resolution, shall thereafter be filed with the County Recorder's
office.
G. Time Limit On Implementing Lot Split: If the City Council determines that
the conditions of approval are not met within twelve (12) months, the lot
split will be null and void.
13-1 B-7: VARIANCES: Variances from the requirements of this title, Title
11: Subdivision Regulations, and Title 12: Zoning Regulations, may be granted
by the City Council as provided in City Code 12-14-7, except that any variance
request shall be made as a part of the lot split approval process.
13-1B-8: COMPLIANCE WITH PROVISIONS:
A. The effect of this chapter shall not work to preclude compliance with
utilities hookup, payment of levied and pending assessments, and
DRAFT A
DRAFT A
performance of any other requirements of the ordinances of the city.
B. The owner, or agent of owner, of any parcel shall not divide any lot or
parcel for the purpose of sale, transfer, or lease with the intent of evading
the provisions of this chapter.
C. The owner, or agent of owner, of any parcel shall not sell or otherwise
convey said parcel with the intent of evading the provisions of this chapter
or circumventing attempts to plat acreage or otherwise subdivide tracts of
land within the city.
13-16-9: APPLICATION AND TERM OF PROVISIONS; CONFLICTS:
A. This chapter shall apply to and govern the entire city during the period for
which it is in effect. This chapter, during its effective period, shall replace
and supersede provisions in all other ordinances and regulations
applicable to the city which are in conflict or inconsistent with the
provisions herein. All ordinances and provisions therein which are not in
conflict with the terms and conditions of this chapter shall continue in full
force and effect.
13-1 B-10: ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTY: Any person, firm or corporation
violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor
and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as defined by state law. The lot
splitting not in accordance with the requirements of this chapter may be enforced
by mandamus, injunction, or any other appropriate remedy in any court of
competent jurisdiction.
DRAFT A
I.7:7_\�YII_�
All other Titles, Chapters and Sections of the City Code shall remain as written and
adopted by the Andover City Council.
The Zoning Ordinance will become valid once it is published in the City designated
newspaper and the correlating Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved by the
Metropolitan Council.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 6th day of June, 2017.
ATTEST:
Michelle Hartner, City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
Julie Trude, Mayor
All other Titles, Chapters and Sections of the City Code shall remain as written and
adopted by the Andover City Council.
The Zoning Ordinance will become valid once it is published in the City designated
newspaper and the correlating Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved by the
Metropolitan Council.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 6th day of June, 2017.
ATTEST:
Michelle Hartner, City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
Julie Trude, Mayor
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. XX
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
CITY CODE TITLE 12 ZONING REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 3
ZONING DISTRICTS AND NIAP
SECTION:
12-3-1:
Purpose Of Zoning Districts
12-3-2:
Zoning Districts Established
12-3-3:
Purpose Of Each District
12-3-4:
Zoning District Map
12-3-5:
Minimum District Provisions
12-3-2: ZONING DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED: For the purpose of this title, the
city is hereby divided into the following zoning districts:
Symbol Name
RR
Single Family Rural Reserve
R-1
Single Family Rural Residential
R-2
Single Family Residential Estate
R-3
Single Family Suburban Residential
R-4
Single Family Urban Residential
R-5
Manufactured Housing
M-1
Multiple Dwelling Medium Density
M-2
Multiple Dwelling
AgP
Agricultural Preserve
GR
General Recreation
LB
Limited Business
NB
Neighborhood Business
u •7\MI111111
I:]CL\Mr:
SC Shopping Center
GB General Business
Industrial
CLR Closed Landfill Restricted
12-3-3: PURPOSE OF EACH DISTRICT:
A. RR Single Family Rural Reserve: Rural Reserve District is approximately one
thousand acres in size to accommodate future urban growth beyond the
Previously planned Municipal Urban Service Area. This area is designated as an
area of which is restricted from urban development until a master plan has been
approved and municipal sewer and water can be constructed to serve the area.
The city prohibits lot splits and subdivisions of less than one parcel per ten acres
to prevent this area from rural residential development that would preclude
orderly MUSA expansion. However, there are opportunities to allow for rural
reserve lot splits of 5 acres minimum in situations which ensure that the majority
of the residual land be preserved for future economical urban development as
long as the provisions of the city codes are met. The intent of the ordinance is
to allow subdivision of land while preserving residual land for future economical
urban development.
R-1 Single Family Rural Residential:
1. This district is intended to provide a residential atmosphere for those persons
desiring to retain a large parcel of land. Such large lots are logical in areas where
development into smaller lots would be difficult, or where public utilities will not
be available in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, larger houses are more
costly and require larger lots. Thus, to provide an area to accommodate those
persons with the financial means to erect a large house, it is necessary to have
an area of large lots.
2. Land which is wooded, or which has a changing topography, and low land
which tends to be poor agriculturally is also the most expensive to develop for
residential sites and, after development, the sites tend to be expensive to
maintain. Such areas are the most interesting and most susceptible to large lot
development. The district also is intended to preserve productive land for
agricultural use. (Amended Ord. 314, 10-4-05)
B. R-2 Single Family Residential Estate: This district is intended to provide a
residential atmosphere for those persons desiring a single-family neighborhood
with a suburban density. Lots in this district created after 1978 and without City
sewer and water must be at least 2.5 acres. This zoning district was used for
rural residential developments prior to 1978. No existing properties may be
rezoned to R-2. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970; amd. 2003 Code, Amended Ord.
314 10-4-2005)
C. R-3 Single Family Suburban Residential: This particular district is intended to
satisfy those persons who prefer a medium sized lot. Lots in this district created
after 1978 and without City sewer and water must be at least 2.5 acres. This
zoning district was used for rural residential developments created before 1978.
No existing properties may be rezoned to R-3. (Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
D. R-4 Single Family Urban Residential: This district represents urban density use
by single-family detached dwellings. (Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
E. R-5 Manufactured Housing District: This district would permit all types of
manufactured housing including manufactured homes and modular houses,
provided public sewer and water is provided. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970)
F. M-1 Multiple Dwelling Medium Density: This district is intended to provide a
location for medium density attached dwelling units (townhouses) with private
entrances. These areas may be transitional, however, the townhouse resident
should have convenient access to all facilities provided for single-family
neighborhoods. This district's location shall provide sufficient space for buffering
from less intense uses. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970; amd. 2003 Code,
Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
G. M-2 Multiple Dwelling District: This district is intended to provide a location for all
types of multiple dwellings. This district's location shall have convenient access
to all facilities provided for neighborhoods, open space, and buffering from less
intense uses. Access to an M-2 district shall be from a collector or arterial
roadway. (Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
H. GR General Recreation District: This district is intended to provide a location for
all types of commercial recreation uses such as golf driving ranges, outdoor
theaters, racetracks, and snowmobile areas, most of which require large
amounts of land and good separation from residential areas. This district's
location shall provide sufficient space for buffering from less intense uses.
(Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
LB Limited Business District: This district is suitable only for commercial uses of
a limited (less intense) nature. This may be due to the close proximity of
residential uses. The LB district can be used as a transitional district or buffer
between non -compatible uses such as intense commercial (GB) and low density
residential uses. (Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
J. NB Neighborhood Business District: This district is used for retail sales and
�
services in such scale as to serve the surrounding neighborhood needs.
Locations for Neighborhood Business districts are typically small plots in close
proximity to or surrounded by residential areas. NB zoning districts do not
require frontage on an arterial roadway and can be served by local and collector
streets. However, this district shall not be served exclusively by local streets.
This district's location shall provide sufficient space for buffering from less
intense uses. (Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
K. SC Shopping Center District: This zoning classification is reserved for modern
retail shopping facilities of integrated design in appropriate locations. Locations
for the SC district are larger plots that can accommodate more intensive retail
development. Access shall be available from arterial roadways. This district's
location shall provide sufficient space for buffering from less intense uses.
(Amended Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
GB General Business District: These are areas containing a wide variety of
business uses including retail, service and semi -industrial. As such, they may
contain businesses that tend to serve other business and industry as well as
those catering to shopper needs.
M. I Industrial District: These are areas that have the prerequisites for industrial
development, but because of proximity to residential areas or the need to protect
certain areas or uses from adverse influences, high development standards will
be necessary. I district uses include service industries and industries which
manufacture, fabricate, assemble or store, where the process is not likely to
create offensive noise, vibrations, dust, heat, smoke, odor, glare or other
objectionable influences. Generally, those include wholesale, service and light
industries that are dependent upon raw materials refined elsewhere. An industrial
"park" which maintains high development standards would be zoned I. This
district's location shall provide sufficient space for buffering from less intense
uses. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970, Ord. 314 10-4-2005)
N. CLR Closed Landfill Restricted: This district is intended to apply to former
landfills and adjacent lands which are managed under the Closed Landfill
Program of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The purpose of the
district is to limit uses of land both actively filled and related lands, to minimal
uses in order to protect the land from human activity where response action
systems are in place. This district shall only apply to the former landfill and
pertinent adjacent lands (the limits of which are defined by the MPCA). This
district shall apply whether the landfill is in public (State, MPCA, County, City,
Township), Indian tribal, or private owners.
11•
12.3.5: MINIMIM DISTRICT PROVISIONS
RR
-1
7
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-51
M-1
M-2
AgP
GR
LB
NB
SC
GB
I
Lot area per dwelling unit
(square feet)
1 -family homes
5 to 10
acres
2.5
acres
2.5
acres
2.5
acres
11,400
5,500
1 -family homes (lots
created before 10117178)
1 acre
20,000
Single-family twin homes
6,000
5,000
Single-family attached
6,000
5,000
Apartments (lot area per
unit in square feet)
1 -bedroom units
4,000
2 -bedroom units
5,000
Floor area per dwelling unit
(square feet) See floor
area definition for two story
homes
1 -family homes
960
960
1,200
960
960
960
960
Single-family twin homes
960
960
Single-family attached
960
960
1 -bedroom apartment units
700
Each additional apartment
bedroom (plus)
150
Lot dimensions
RR
R-1
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-51
M-1
M-2
AgP
GR
LB
NB
SC
GB
I
Lot width -front setback line
(feet)
300
300
300
300
80
150
150
300
120
100
150
200
100
100
Lot width (lots created
before 10117178)
165
100
Lot width (feet)
1,320
Lot depth (feet)
150
150
150
150
130
1150
150
135
135
150
150
150
150
Minimum garage size
440
440
440
440
440
220+1
220+1
220 + 1
440
(square feet)
prk spc
ark spc
prk spc
Lot dimensions
RR
R-1
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-51
M-1
M-2
AgP
GR
LB
NB
SC
GB
I
(continued)
Nonresidential lot area
10
5 acres
1 acre
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
40
20,000
20,000
22,500
30,000
20,000
24,000
(acres or square feet)
acres
sf
sf
sf
sf
acres
sf
sf
sf
sf
sf
sf
Minimum district size
2 acres
5 acres
Principal structure height
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
45
45
45
(maximum) subject to City
Code 12-3-5 8.6
Land coverage (maximum
20
20
20
30
30
20
30
30
Up to 40
Up to 40
Up to 40
Up to 40
Up to 50
percent of structures)
Building setbacks?
RR
R-1
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-51
M-1
M-2
AgP
GR
LB
NB
SC
GB
I
Any yard setback from
50
50
50
50
40
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
county road subject to City
Code 12-5.41
Front yard setback (feet)
40
40
40
35
351
30
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
Side yard principal
10
10
10
10
10
20
30
10
104
104
104
104
104
structure setback from
interior lot linea
Side yard setback from
40
40
40
35
355
30
30
40
30
30
30
30
30
30
property line adjacent to
street
Attached residential
6
garage (over 20 feet wide)
from interior lot line
Rear yard setback
50
50
50
30
30
30
30
30
25
25
25
25
25
Rear yard setback for any
40
40
40
35
35
residential structure from
prop. line adjacent to street
Notes: 1. Allowed by Planned Unit Development only.
2. Unless existing structures would indicate a lesser setback to maintain uniformity.
3. An additional 5 -foot setback shall be added when plans for the principal structure accommodate an access for a deck.
4. See Section 12-5-3 of this title for setback adjacent to residential areas.
DRAFT B
5. 25 feet if it is a back-to-back lot.
6. See City Code 12-13 for exceptions allowed as a Conditional Use
7. See also City Code 12-5-4 when less than minimum required right-of-way exists
All setback measurements are from property lines.
(Ord. 273, 9-2-2003; amd. Ord. 274, 9-2-2003; amd. Ord. 314,10-4-2005; Ord. 403,12-21-10; Amended Ord. 423,10-16-12)
CHAPTER 7
FENCES AND WALLS
12-7-3: FENCE HEIGHT:
A. In the rear and side yards up to the front fagade of the principal structure, fences
up to a height of six (6) feet are allowed. (Amended Ord. 386, 8/5/09)
B. Fences located closer to the front property line than the principal structure, shall
not exceed four (4) feet in height. In the RR Single -Family Rural Reserve, R-1
Single -Family Rural Residential and R-2 Single -Family Estate zoning districts,
"ornamental fences", as defined in Section 12-2-2 of this title, of up to six (6) feet
in height are permitted in all yards, provided the fence does not encroach upon
the Clear View Triangle as defined in Section 12-2-2 of this code. (Amended
Ord. 386, 8/5/09)
CHAPTER 9
HOME OCCUPATIONS
12-9-12: FARM WINERIES: The following provisions shall apply to all farm
wineries that are considered home occupations under the Conditional Use Permit
process:
Farm wineries which shall be allowed on 2 Yz acre or larger parcels in the RR, R-1, R-2
and R-3 Zoning Districts,
1[ 7\ 111:3
Chapter 12
RESIDENTIAL
PERMTrrED, PERMITTED ACCESSORY, CONDITIONAL, INTERIM AND PROHBrEED USFST
P -Permitted Use
R-1 Sin a Famil -Rural M-2 Multi le Dwellin
PA -Permitted Accessory Use
R-2 Single Family. Estate Sin le Famil Rural Reserve
C -Conditional User sae FOOTNOTES
R-3 Single Family- Suburban
X -Prohibited Use
RA Single Family- Urban
PUD- Planned Unit Develo mens
R-5 Manufactured Housin
I- Interum Use
M-1 Multiple Dwelling. Low
Density
If Use Not Spec Scally Listed or Provided for Elsewhere in the City Code, It Is Prohibited
RR
I R-1
R -2R-3
R-4 3 R-5
M-1
M-2
.ALIDIRIS
Animal Therapy Facility -on properties larger than five acres in size
-c--F
C
C
X
X
X
X
Commercial animal training (2.5 acre minimum residential lot size)
C
I C
C
C
X
I X
X
X
Commercial riding stables
C
C
X
X
X
X
X
X
Dog kennel license - Private (2.5 acre minimum lot size required) in
compliance with City Code 54A
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Dog kennel license - Commercial (minimum 2.5 acre lot size) in compliance
with City Code 54A
C
C
C
C
C
C
X
X
Domestic animals in compliance with City Code Title 5
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
Farm animals up to 5 per acre, plus one additional farm animal per acre
above 5 acres on residential properties 5 acres or greater up to a maximum of
20 animalss and definition under City Code 12-2
p
p
P
P
X
X
X
X
Farre animals greater than allowed as a permitted use on residential properties
5 acres or greater in compliance with City Code Title 5' and definition under
City Code 12-2
C
C
C
C
X
X
X
X
Feedlots, except Anoka Independent Grain and Feed Inc. which is a permitted
use that predates the adoption of this ordinance.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pleasurelrecreation animals on residential properties at least 2.5 acres in size
in compliance with City Code Title 5 and definition under City Code 12-2
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
X
X
X
Poultry on residential properties with neither municipal sewer or water in
compliance with Ci Code Title 5 and definition under City Code 12-2
P
P
p
p
X
X
X
X
Dwells
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
C
C
X
X
X
X
X
X
Manufactured homes and modular homes, provided they are developed under
a planned unit development and the complex is a minimum of twenty (20)
acres in size
X
X
X
X
X
PUD
X
X
Multiple dwellings
Relocated dwelling units in compliance with City Code 9-11
Single-family residential buildings (detached)
X
C
P
X
C
P
X
C
P
X
C
P
X
C
P
X
C
PUD
PUD
C
PUD
PUD
C
PUD
Single-family residential buildings (attached) and townhouses
X
X
X
X
X
X
PUD
PUD
Temporary Family Health Care Facility
XA
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Two-family home conversions (splits) in compliance with City Code 12-8-1
X
X
X
X
X
X
C
C
orne 0U rpationc
Home occupations within principal structure in compliance with City Code
12-9
PA
P
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
Home occupations in accessory structure on a parcel of land three (3) acres or
larger utilizing an accessory structure and/or exterior storage in compliance
with City Code 12-9
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Rarbersho s and bea!L salons
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
P -Permitted Use a Famil -Rural -2- Mufti Ie Dwellin
breakfast
C
C
C
C
C
C
X
X
or roomers, up to two persons, by a resident family, with no private
acilities
PA
P
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
Daycare Facility -Group Family
aking/wood working (home occupation) in compliance with City
9
MDaycuc
C
C
X
X
X
X
X
X
Farm Wineries (subject to City Code 12-9-12)
ial greenhouse
C
C
C
C
X
X
X
X
Group Homes as regulated by State Statute
enters- Home Occu anon (12 or fewer children)
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Office in compliance with City Code 12-9
enters -Home Occupation (13 or more children) Ei
P
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
P -Permitted Use a Famil -Rural -2- Mufti Ie Dwellin
PA- Permitted Accessory Use a Family- Estate R Sin le Famil - Rural Reserve
C -Conditional Use' srzroomons Family -Suburban
EM
X- Prohibited Use e Family- Urban
MDensity
PUD- Planned Unit Developmentfactured Housing
I-InterimUse iple Dwelling- Low
If Use Not Specifically Listed or Provided for Elsewhere in the City Code, It Is Prohibited
RR
R -I
R-2
R-3'
R-4 a
R-5
M-1
M-2
Daycare Facility -Group Family
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Farm Wineries (subject to City Code 12-9-12)
PA
PA
C
C
X
X
X
X
Group Homes as regulated by State Statute
C
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
Office in compliance with City Code 12-9
C
C
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
Therapeutic massage establishment (as a home occupation offering on site
massae services) as re lated by chapter 9 of this title and title 3, chapterb
p
P
C
C
C
C
C
C
Schools
K-12 Schools
P
P
P
P
P
P
X
X
Post -secondary Schools
pq
pp
C
C
C
C
X
X
Schools exceeding height maximum up to 45 feet in height
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Subordinate Classroom Structures (when located on a licensed Primary
and/or Secondary schoolproperty)
C
C
I
I
[
I
I
I
Subordinate Classroom Structures (when located on a property where there is
a church as the principal use)
P
P
I
1
I
I
I
I
[
ttlttt c
Private utilities (gas, electric, phone, cable, etc) in Compliance with City
Code 8-2
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Private utility structwes and/or uses (electrical transmission lines, gas
pipelines, etc.)
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Public utility uses for local services
p
P
P
P
P
p
p
p
other
Agricultural uses- rural (outside MUSA bound onl)
P
P
P
P
X
X
X
X
Agricultural uses- urban
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Antennas in excess of thirty-five feet (35') in height in compliance with City
Code 9-12
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Buildings (Principal) exceeding height maximum subject to City Code 12-3-5
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Bulk fuel storage (tanks greater than 1,000 gallon storage capacity) in
compliance with City Code 12-8-5
C
C
X
X
X
X
X
X
Campgrounds clubs and ranges, archeEy ranges, racetracks
C
C
X
X
X 1
X
X 1
X
Cemeteries
P
P
C
C
C
C
C
C
Churches
C
C
C
C
C I
C I
X I
X
led es
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
d antique businesses in buildings designated as historical sites by a
ate or national) reco ized historical or anization
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
C
nd Acceso Structures in com liance with Ci Code 12-6
Wcourses
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
Pp
ses and drivin ran es
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
construction materials (em orocesin and store e
I
I
I
I
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
wned and o erated ro erty except as herein amended
P
P
P
P
p
p
p
P
Resorts
C
C
C
C
X
X
X
X
Solar EnergyS stems ( oand mounted subject to Ci Code 9-15
PA
PA
X
X
X
X
X
X
Solar Energy Systems (roof mounted) subject to City Code 9-15
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
Swimming pools and recreation areas or structure
PA
PA
PA
pp
pp
PA
PA
PA
Uses which may be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons
residing or workinE in the vicinity
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Wind Energy Conversion Systems (WECS)-as defined in and in compliance
with Tide 9, Chapter 13 of this code. WECS areprohibited on WDE site.
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
(Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-1970; amd. Ord. 81JJJJJ, 7-18-2002; Ord. 8000000, 8-5-2002; Ord.8000QQQ, 10-1-2002; Ord.
8RRRRRR, 10-1-
2002; amd. Ord. 8AAAAAAA, 4-15-2003; amd. 2003 Code; amd. Ord. 314 10-4-2005; amd. Ord. 385 7-21-09; amd. Ord.
388 10-20-09; amd. Ord. 390 3-16-10; amd. Ord. 397 8-17-10; Amd. Ord. 404, 1-18-11; Amd. Ord. 436,4-15-14; Amd. Ord.
463,6-21-16
I Conditional use permits for uses not listed herein shall not be granted except where the city council determines that said uses are
similar in character to those listed herein. Within any of the following districts, no land or structure shall be used for the
following uses by districts except by conditional use permit and in accordance with the criteria as stated in subsection 12-15-6D
of this title.
2 Private sewer and water systems shall only be permitted on every other lot, or no more frequently than one private system for
each forty thousand (40,000) square feet where large lots are established. This shall not apply to lots of record at the time this
title is adopted. On each new plat, the lots are to be developed in accordance with this chapter and shall be so designated.
3 Private sewer and water systems shall only be permitted to replace systems on existing lots when municipal sewer and
water is not available. (Amended Ord. 314, 10-4-2005)
4 Provided a minimum of twenty five thousand (25,000) square feet of retail floor space is constructed, except as otherwise
approved as par of a
Planned Unit Development.
5 Loading berths prohibited in the LB district.
6 After a minimum of two thousand (2,000) square feel of retail floor space is constructed, provided the site is two (2) acres or
larger.
7 See subsection 13-24 of this code for permitted, conditional, and prohibited uses in the AgP district.
8 Farm operations in existence on April 18, 2006 are exempt from this provision. See also City Code 12-4-4.
9 Sec 12-2-2 for definitions of "Continuous Operation and Non -continuous Operation'. (Amended Ord. 421, 10-2-12)
10 From November 15th to January I st continuous operation will be allowed in the General Business and industrial Zoning District.
(Amended Ord.
424, 11-7-12)
It •
CHAPTER13
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
12-13-21: RESIDENTIAL BUILDING STANDARDS: All permitted residential
structures in RR R-1, R-2, R-3, and R4 zoning districts shall meet the following design
criteria:
A. All structures shall have permanent concrete or treated wood foundations that
will anchor the structure, which comply with the State Building Code as adopted
in Section 9-1-1 of this code and which are solid for the complete circumference
of the house. Except, four -season porches may be constructed without the
permanent foundation, provided the porch does not exceed a maximum
coverage of twenty percent (20%) of the footprint of the habitable portion of the
principal structure.
B. Sixty percent (60%) of a residential structure shall have a minimum width of
twenty-four feet (24'). Width measurements shall not take into account overhangs
or other projections. Such width requirement shall be in addition to the minimum
area per dwelling requirements of Section 12-3-5 of this title.
C. Single-family dwellings other than approved earth sheltered homes shall have at
least a 4:12 roof pitch and shall be covered with shingles or tiles. This
requirement shall not apply to three -season porches, four -season porches,
greenhouses and solariums, provided they meet the State Building Code and are
approved by the Building Official.
D. All single-family dwellings shall have roof overhangs that extend a minimum of
one foot (1') from all the walls of the structure unless the style of the house
dictates otherwise and said plan is approved by the Building Official prior to any
permits being granted.
E. All single-family structures must be built in conformance with Minnesota
statutes sections 327.31 to 327.35 or the State Building Code as adopted in
Section 9-1-1 of this code.
F. Any metal siding upon single-family residential structures shall have horizontal
edges and overlapping sections no wider than twelve inches (12"). Sheet metal
siding shall not be permitted in such districts.
G. All exterior construction, including finish and the final grading, shall be completec
in accordance with plans and specifications within one year following date of
permit issuance. All existing buildings not meeting the provisions of this title shall
See also title 9, chapter 1 of this code.
We: :
comply within one year following adoption of this title. (Amended Ord. 8, 10-21-
1970; amd. 2003 Code)
1113t"wli:
TITLE 13
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Subject
Chapter
Splitting Lots, Parcels Or Tracts Of Land Generally. 1A
Splitting Lots, Parcels Or Tracts Of Land Within
Rural Reserve.................................................1B
Agricultural Preservation............................................2
Planned Unit Development (PUD) .............................3
Shoreland Management.............................................4
Bluffland And Riverland Development .......................5
Buffer Strips And Standards For Protection
Of Wetlands And Storm Water Ponds.......................6
17:: :
CHAPTER 1A
SPLITTING LOTS, PARCELS OR TRACTS OF L4ND GENERALLY
SECTION:
13-1A -1:
Definition
13-1A
-2:
Minimum Lot Requirements
13-1A
-3:
Frequency Of Splitting Lots
13-1A
-4:
Application For Lot Split
13-1A
-5:
Fees
13-1A
-6:
Review And Recommendations
13-1 A_
-7:
Variances
13-1A
-8:
Compliance With Provisions
13-1A
-9:
Application And Term Of Provisions; Conflicts
13-1A
-10:
Enforcement And Penalty
13-1A-1: DEFINITION: A "lot split' is any division of a lot, parcel, or tract of
land into not more than two (2) parcels when both divided parcels meet or
exceed the minimum requirements for platted lots in the applicable zoning
district. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977)
13-1A-2: MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS: No lot, parcel or tract of land
shall be divided unless the resultant lots have at least the minimum width, depth
and square footage as required for any parcel of land in the.zoning district
wherein the lot is located. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977)
13-1A-3: FREQUENCY OF SPLITTING LOTS: No owner may utilize this
method of land division on any parcel more than one time in any three (3) year
period. A three (3) year waiting period for a lot split is required on all lots, parcels
or tracts from the date they were created by previous lot splits under this chapter.
(Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977)
A. Exceptions. A lot split may be applied for within the three (3) year waiting
period provided the following conditions are met:
1. The property owner has owned the property for more than five years.
2. A one year waiting period shall be required between splits.
3. A maximum of three lots shall be created including the original lot.
4. City infrastructure and utilities such as sanitary sewer, storm sewer,
water main and streets are in place.
5. Grading, drainage and erosion control plans shall be prepared that
properly address how drainage will be handled on the site as well as
the affect on adjacent properties to the satisfaction of the City.
U:: :
(Amended 431, 10-15-13)
13-1A-4: APPLICATION FOR LOT SPLIT: The applicant shall provide the
following information:
A. The scale and north direction.
B. Dimensions of the property.
C. Names and locations of adjacent streets.
D. Location of existing buildings on and within one hundred feet (100') of
subject property.
E. Current zoning and legal description.
F. Sufficient proof that the lot has not been split within the last three (3)
years.
G. A Inst of the pFE)Pehy E) 8Fs w'fti R +tipP-e ti RGIFed f #y feet (350') „f the i„r
&Ot-
#G. Such other information as may be required to fully represent the
intent of the lot split. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977)
13-1A-5: FEES:
A. There shall be a single charge as set forth by ordinance plus
consultant's fees, if any, for a lot split application'.
B. Where parkland was dedicated or a park fee paid at the time the original
parcel was created, there shall be no park fee assessed or land
dedicated at the time of the lot split application. If no park fees have
been assessed nor land dedicated as above, the fee, as set forth by
ordinance for each lot created under this chapter, may be assessed for
park feesz. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977; amd. 2003 Code)
13-1A-6: REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. Planning And Zoning Commission Review: The proposed lot split shall first
be presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its review and
recommendation. Such recommendations shall consider land uses, traffic
control, zoning regulation, future developments, and conformance with the
comprehensive development plan, and any other criteria deemed pertinent
1 See subsection 1-7-3H of this code.
2 See subsection 1-7-3G of this code.
M
by the Planning and Zoning Commission. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977)
B. Notice To Adjacent Property Owners: Upon receipt of an application for a
lot split, the Community Development Director shall notify by mail all
property owners within three hundred fifty feet (350') of the property of the
date of the review of such lot split. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977; amd.
2003 Code)
C. Planning And Zoning Commission Recommendation To City Council: The
division of a lot may be recommended for approval; provided that such
split is in conformance with the City Comprehensive Plan, does not
interfere with orderly planning, is not contrary to the public interest and
does not nullify the intent of this chapter.
D. City Council Action:
1. Following review and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning
Commission, the request for a lot split shall be placed on the agenda of
the City Council in the following manner:
a. Recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting held on the second Tuesday shall be placed on the
agenda of the City Council at the first Tuesday meeting of the
following month.
b. Recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting held on the fourth Tuesday shall be placed on the agenda
of the City Council at the third Tuesday meeting of the following
month, unless there are five (5) Tuesdays in the given month from
which the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission
is made, in which case, the recommendation shall be placed on the
agenda of the City Council at the first Tuesday meeting of the
following month.
2. Within sixty (60) days following receipt of the proposed lot split from the
Planning and Zoning Commission, the Council shall approve or
disapprove by resolution. If approved, a certified copy of the resolution
approving the lot split shall be forwarded to the petitioner.
E. Record Of Lot Split: The lot split, together with a certified copy of
the resolution, shall thereafter be filed with the County Recorder's
office.
F. Time Limit On Implementing Lot Split: If the City Council determines that
the conditions of approval are not met within twelve (12) months, the lot
split will be null and void. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977)
DRAFT B
13-1A-7: VARIANCES: Variances from the requirements of this title, Title
11: Subdivision Regulations, and Title 12: Zoning Regulations, may be granted
by the City Council as provided in City Code 12-14-7, except that any variance
request shall be made as a part of the lot split approval process. (Amended Ord.
407,6-21-11)
13-1A-8: COMPLIANCE WITH PROVISIONS:
A. The effect of this chapter shall not work to preclude compliance with
utilities hookup, payment of levied and pending assessments, and
performance of any other requirements of the ordinances of the city.
B. The owner, or agent of owner, of any parcel shall not divide any lot or
parcel for the purpose of sale, transfer, or lease with the intent of evading
the provisions of this chapter.
C. The owner, or agent of owner, of any parcel shall not sell or otherwise
convey said parcel with the intent of evading the provisions of this chapter
or circumventing attempts to plat acreage or otherwise subdivide tracts of
land within the city. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977)
■ \R7t1.T.Ktlf'P.T.T.S�CT.T.'WIN
_
_ _
101's
13-1A-9: APPLICATION AND TERM OF PROVISIONS; CONFLICTS:
A. This chapter shall apply to and govern the entire city during the period for
which it is in effect. This chapter, during its effective period, shall replace
and supersede provisions in all other ordinances and regulations
applicable to the city which are in conflict or inconsistent with the
provisions herein. All ordinances and provisions therein which are not in
conflict with the terms and conditions of this chapter shall continue in full
force and effect.
13-1A-10: ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTY: Any person, firm or corporation
violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor
and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as defined by state law. The lot
splitting not in accordance with the requirements of this chapter may be enforced
by mandamus, injunction, or any other appropriate remedy in any court of
competent jurisdiction. (Amended Ord. 40, 8-16-1977)
CHAPTER 1B
SPLITTING LOTS, PARCELS OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE RURAL
RESERVE DISTRICT
SECTION:
13-1 B-1:
Definition
13-1B-2:
Minimum Lot Requirements
13-1 B-3:
Frequency Of Splitting Lots
13-1 B-4:
Application For Lot Split
13-1 B-5:
Fees
13-1 B-6:
Review And Recommendations
13-1 B-7:
Variances
13-1B-8:
Compliance With Provisions
13-1 B-9:
Application And Term Of Provisions; Conflicts
13-1 B-10:
Enforcement And Penalty
13-113-1: DEFINITION: A "lot split' is any division of a lot, parcel, or tract of
land into more than four (4) parcels when both divided parcels meet or exceed
the minimum requirements for platted lots in the applicable zoning district.
13-1 B-2: MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS: No lot, parcel or tract of land
shall be divided unless the resultant lots have at least the minimum width, depth
and square footage as required for any parcel of land in the zoning district
wherein the lot is located.
13-1 B-3: FREQUENCY OF SPLITTING LOTS: No owner may utilize this
method of land division on any parcel more than one time in any three (3) year
period. A three (3) year waiting period for a lot split is required on all lots, parcels
or tracts from the date they were created by previous lot splits under this chapter.
A. Exceptions. A lot split may be applied for within the three (3) year waiting
period provided the following conditions are met:
1. The property owner has owned the property for more than five years.
2. A one year waiting period shall be required between splits.
3. A maximum of three lots shall be created including the original lot.
4. City infrastructure and utilities such as sanitary sewer, storm sewer,
water main and streets are in place.
5. Grading, drainage and erosion control plans shall be prepared that
properly address how drainage will be handled on the site as well as
the affect on adjacent properties to the satisfaction of the City.
(Amended 431, 10-15-13)
FBI Wk.VM I i
DRAFT B
13-1 B-4: APPLICATION FOR LOT SPLIT: The applicant shall provide the
following information:
A. The scale and north direction.
B. Dimensions of the property.
C. Names and locations of adjacent streets.
D. Location of existing buildings on and within one hundred feet (100') of
subject property.
E. Current zoning and legal description.
F. Sufficient proof that the lot has not been split within the last three (3)
years.
G. Floodplain shall be identified if applicable within the lot(s) proposed to
have a home. An overlay may be used on the remnant parcel.
H. Existing topography shall be shown along with proposed grading of the
site (if necessary). Light Detection And Ranging (LIDAR) contour
information may be used for the remnant parcel.
Wetland delineation for the lot(s) that intend to have homes located on
them. National Wetland Information (NWI) is acceptable for the remnant
parcel.
J. When a lot split results in a lot less than 10 acres in size, the applicant
shall restrict future development of homes through a development
agreement until defined "triggers" are met such as: urban services are
available, rezoning of said parcel to a higher density, change in the
comprehensive plan to a zoning district that would allow higher density,
among other "triggers" as may be deemed appropriate by the City Council
on the remnant parcel.
K. Proof of sewerability for lots proposed to have home(s).
L. Geotechnical Report. A standard geotechnical report with a history and
recommendations regarding the sites. In addition, the report shall include
SCS soil types, mottled soil elevations or highest anticipated water table,
existing groundwater elevation, and soil borings to a minimum depth of 20
feet for the lots proposed to have homes on them.
M. Other information may be required to fully represent the intent of the lot
split.
13-1B-5: FEES:
I1lt7\Mr.1
I11:7aN111111:'
A. There shall be a single charge as set forth by ordnance plus
consultant's fees, if any, for a lot split application'.
B. Where parkland was dedicated or a park fee paid at the time the original
parcel was created, there shall be no park fee assessed or land
dedicated at the time of the lot split application. If no park fees have
been assessed nor land dedicated as above, the fee, as set forth by
ordinance for each lot created under this chapter, may be assessed for
park fees2.
13-1B-6: REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. If a parcel is greater than 35 acres and is described by the rectangular
survey system as a quarter, quarter section, at the time of adoption of this
ordinance then that quarter, quarter is eligible for 4 units.
B. A parcel greater than 35 acres and described by the rectangular survey
system as a quarter, quarter section, may be split into 4 equal parts and
shall not be required to restrict future development.
C. Splits that do not create parcels less than 10 acres in size, and do not
require public improvements (i.e. new roadways, construction of
roadways) shall not be required to a public hearing process, Planning
Commission Review, or City Council Review.
D. Andover Review Committee (ARC): All proposed lot splits shall first be
reviewed by ARC. The applicant shall make modifications based upon
ARC's comments and then resubmit for consideration at a Public Hearing
for Planning and Zoning. For splits that do not create parcels less than 10
acres in size, and do not require public improvements (i.e. new roadways,
construction of roadways) ARC shall provide approval or denial of said
splits.
E. Notice To Adjacent Property Owners: Upon receipt of a completed
application for a lot split, the Community Development Director shall notify
by mail all property owners within three hundred fifty feet (350') of the
property of the date of the public hearing at the Planning Commission of
such lot split.
F. Planning And Zoning Commission Review: The Planning and Zoning
Commission for its review and recommendation shall conduct a public
hearing. Such recommendations shall consider land uses, traffic control,
See subsection 1-7-3H of this code.
z See subsection 1-7-3G of this code.
1A7:7_\:YIF:1
DRAFT B
zoning regulation, future developments, and conformance with the
comprehensive development plan, and any other criteria deemed pertinent
by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
D. Planning And Zoning Commission Recommendation To City Council: The
Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing and provide for a
recommendation to the City Council. The division of a lot may be
recommended for approval; provided that such split is in conformance with
the City Comprehensive Plan, does not interfere with orderly planning, is
not contrary to the public interest and does not nullify the intent of this
chapter.
E. City Council Action:
1. Following review and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning
Commission, the request for a lot split shall be placed on the agenda of
the City Council in the following manner:
a. Recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting held on the second Tuesday shall be placed on the
agenda of the City Council at the first Tuesday meeting of the
following month.
b. Recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting held on the fourth Tuesday shall be placed on the agenda
of the City Council at the third Tuesday meeting of the following
month, unless there are five (5) Tuesdays in the given month from
which the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission
is made, in which case, the recommendation shall be placed on the
agenda of the City Council at the first Tuesday meeting of the
following month.
2. Within sixty (60) days following receipt of the proposed lot split from the
Planning and Zoning Commission, the Council shall approve or
disapprove by resolution. If approved, a certified copy of the resolution
approving the lot split shall be forwarded to the petitioner.
F. Record Of Lot Split: The lot split, any deed restrictions required,
any easements required, together with a certified copy of the
resolution, shall thereafter be filed with the County Recorder's
office.
G. Time Limit On Implementing Lot Split: If the City Council determines that
the conditions of approval are not met within twelve (12) months, the lot
split will be null and void.
DRAFT B
13-1 B-7: VARIANCES: Variances from the requirements of this title, Title 11:
Subdivision Regulations, and Title 12: Zoning Regulations, may be granted by the City
Council as provided in City Code 12-14-7, except that any variance request shall be
made as a part of the lot split approval process.
13-1B-8: COMPLIANCE WITH PROVISIONS:
A. The effect of this chapter shall not work to preclude compliance with utilities
hookup, payment of levied and pending assessments, and performance of any
other requirements of the ordinances of the city.
B. The owner, or agent of owner, of any parcel shall not divide any lot or parcel for
the purpose of sale, transfer, or lease with the intent of evading the provisions of
this chapter.
C. The owner, or agent of owner, of any parcel shall not sell or otherwise convey
said parcel with the intent of evading the provisions of this chapter or
circumventing attempts to plat acreage or otherwise subdivide tracts of land
within the city.
13-1B-9: APPLICATION AND TERM OF PROVISIONS; CONFLICTS:
A. This chapter shall apply to and govern the entire city during the period for which it
is in effect. This chapter, during its effective period, shall replace and supersede
provisions in all other ordinances and regulations applicable to the city which are
in conflict or inconsistent with the provisions herein. All ordinances and
provisions therein which are not in conflict with the terms and conditions of this
chapter shall continue in full force and effect.
13-1 B-10: ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTY: Any person, firm or corporation
violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and,
upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as defined by state law. The lot splitting not
in accordance with the requirements of this chapter may be enforced by mandamus,
injunction, or any other appropriate remedy in any court of competent jurisdiction.
All other Titles, Chapters and Sections of the City Code shall remain as written and
adopted by the Andover City Council.
The Zoning Ordinance will become valid once it is published in the City designated
newspaper and the correlating Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved by the
Metropolitan Council.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 6th day of June, 2017
ATTEST:
Michelle Hartner, City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
Julie Trude, Mayor
GG Meeting Minutes
March 21, 2017
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes —March 21, 2017
Page 2
carried unanimously.
March 7, 2016, Workshop Meeting: Correct as written.
Mayor Trude asked staff to confirm the accuracy. Mr. Dickinson confirmed the minutes
reflected the discussion at the meeting regarding edits to the upcoming survey.
Motion by Bukkila, Seconded by Knight, to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried
unanimously.
CONSENT ITEMS
Item 2 Approve Payment of Claims
Item 3 Approve Resolution Removing No Parking Signs Along 16811, Lane NW (See Resolution
R022-17)
Item 4 Approve No Parking Resolution/16811i Lane NW/MSA Street Reconstruction Project/17-
11 (See Resolution R023-17)
Item 5 Declare Surplus Equipment
Item 6 Approve Agreement/17-12/Reconstruction of 133rd Ave. NW (West of Crooked Lake
Blvd. NW)
Motion by Goodrich, Seconded by Knight, approval of the Consent Agenda as read. Motion
carried unanimously.
ANOKA COUNTYSHERIFF'S OFFICE MONTHLYREPORT
Commander Brian Podany gave the monthly Sheriff's report. With the warmer weather,
Commander Podany encouraged residents to be vigilant and to call 911 when they see anything
suspicious and to provide a description of potential suspects and vehicles. He also reminded the
public about the road closure on Bunker Lake Boulevard.
Councilmember Holthus arrived at 7:14 p.m.
ANDOVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT — RURAL RESERVE
RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DENSITY CHANGES
At the October 25, 2016, City Council workshop, the Council discussed a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment (CPA) by Jake and Jon Packer to allow the subdivision of land within the Rural
Reserve District into parcels smaller than what is currently allowed in the Comprehensive Plan.
City Council provided direction to staff to proceed with a CPA and ordinance to address future
development within the Rural Reserve area.
At the February 28, 2017, City Council workshop staff provided conceptual changes to the City
Council and the City Council supported the changes. The Rural Reserve District was designated
as an area to accommodate future urban growth beyond the planned Municipal Urban Service
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes —March 21, 2017
Page 3
Area (MUSA). Lot splits of less than one unit/house per 20 acres and subdivisions of less than 1
unit/house per 40 acres is prohibited to prevent this area from rural residential development that
would preclude orderly MUSA expansion. The City has reached an agreement with the
Metropolitan Council that areas designated for residential development in the Rural Reserve will
be developed at 3 units/houses per net acre once MUSA is available. The Met Council supports
densities of 1 unit/house per 10 acres in the rural reserve area. Density beyond this is supported
by Met Council; however, it requires provisions such as an ordinance to allow for future
wastewater service at a minimum density of 3 units/houses per acre.
Staff is proposing to retain a density of 1 unit/house per 10 acres; however, with the adoption of
an ordinance the minimum lot size may be reduced to 5 acres as long as the provisions in the
ordinance are addressed at the time of the lot split or subdivision. Planning tools that would need
to be considered in the ordinance include requirements of build -out plans (ghost platting), the
location of building pads that allow for future subdivision of the land into urban lots, and the use
of deed restrictions, easements, and/or covenants to protect the remaining land for future
development. The intent of the ordinance is to allow subdivision of land while preserving the
land for future urban development.
The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on March 14, 2017. There were
public comments that are available for review in the draft minutes of that meeting. Andover
resident, Mr. Chadwick, Jr., was not in attendance, but he submitted an email with his comments
that became part of the public record. The Commission recommended approval of the CPA
request with a 5 - 0 vote (2 absent).
City staff recommends the City Council consider the proposed CPA. If approved by the City
Council the amendment will be forwarded to the Metropolitan Council for their formal approval.
Mr. Janish reviewed the staff report with the Council.
Mayor Trude asked Mr. Janish to address the next step, will that be the zoning code revisions.
Mr. Janish replied the next step is to go to Metropolitan Council for their approval. Part of the
review process will be for staff to describe the provision for adequate roadways, water, sewer,
and consideration of future right-of-ways. The desire is to allow use of the property today as
well as to preserve the area for urban growth at a future date.
Mayor Trude noted an email had been received from Bob and Mary Harrell. It expressed
concerns related to: few options for development of utilities, keeping enough acreage for
buffering from rural to urban, and more density being forced upon the remaining parcels - while
supporting the owner's ability to develop the land. The City will reserve the right to commit or
take easements for utilities and roads according to the Master Plan, which has relevance to the
other 20 acres.
Mr. Janish reminded the Council this is the first step in a two-step process, and even with
Metropolitan Council approval it will not be effective until the City has the new ordinance
Regular Andover City Council Meeting
Minutes — March 21, 2017
Page 4
language in place. Preservation of the 20 acres for future development remains important.
Councilmember Holthus asked if there is a problem with the proposed timeline in working with
the Metropolitan Council. Mr. Janish indicated other cities are doing something similar and staff
had been working closely with the City's Met Council Representative, so we expect a smooth
process.
Councilmember Knight asked if an overlay is available for viewing. Mr. Janish responded it is
not available at this time. He pointed to where the lots would be on the available map.
Councilmember Goodrich stated he supports residents being able to do what they want on their
own property; therefore, he would like to support this proposal.
Mayor Trude commented this property is multi -generational land, and is tied up by regulations.
She expressed her desire to look at the big picture and individual property owner rights.
Mr. Janish indicated ghost platting would be done as part of the review process for the new lots.
Mayor Trude pointed out that sewer is already planned and access would be about 2 miles from
this property.
Motion by Bukkila, Seconded by Goodrich, to approve Resolution No. R024-17, amending the
comprehensive land use plan of the City of Andover to include the following: within the Rural
Reserve residential land use to allow one unit per ten acres with the opportunity to allow one unit
per five acres with the compliance of ordinance provisions as proposed. Motion carried
unanimously.
CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION FOR APPOINTMENT/COON CREEK WATERSHED
DISTRICT VACANCY
Mr. Dickinson reported no applications were received.
The Council discussed the appointment. Mr. Dickinson said no action can be taken because the
City must send 3 recommendations in order to be considered.
No action needed to be taken.
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
City Staff updated the Council on the administration and city department activities, legislative
updates, updates on development/CIP projects, and meeting reminders/community events.
(New Homes) Mr. Dickinson reported there have been 19 new home permits and 5 in for review
for a total of 24 this year, which is a good start.
CC Workshop Meeting Minutes
March 28, 2017
ANDOVER CITYCOUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING—MARCH 28, 2017
MINUTES
The Workshop Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Julie Trude,
March 28, 2017, 6:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover,
Minnesota.
Councilmembers present: Mike Knight, Sheri Bukkila, Valerie Holthus and James Goodrich
Councilmember absent: None
Also present: City Administrator, Jim Dickinson
Community Development Director, Joe Janish
Associate Planner, Dan Krumwiede
Public Works Director/City Engineer, David Berkowitz
Planning & Zoning Commission Acting Chair, Kyle Nemeth
Planning & Zoning Commissioner, Steve Peterson
Planning & Zoning Commissioner, Scott Hudson
Planning & Zoning Commissioner, Bert Koehler
Planning & Zoning Commissioner, Jeffrey Sims
Others
JOINT MEETING WITH PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
a. Zoning Text Amendment Rural Reserve
Mr. Janish stated on March 21, 2017, City Council approved the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment (CPA) for the Rural Reserve area. Staff is in the process of submitting the CPA
request to the Met Council for formal approval. The CPA will allow land owners within the
Rural Reserve area the opportunity to subdivide land at a density of no more than 4 units per 40
acres. He noted landowners will have two options.
Mr. Janish reviewed the two different options and indicated they have the ability to go with
option one but option two is typically supported by the Met Council. He noted option one is
more restrictive than what the Met Council allows for because they are preserving the rest of the
land.
Mr. Janish indicated staff would like to get some feedback from both the City Council and
Planning and Zoning Commission to get some direction on the development of the zoning text
amendment.
Mr. Janish stated current city code regulations do not require a public hearing for metes and
bounds lot splits of 5 acres or more. Staff would like to know if a public hearing should be
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes —March 28, 2017
Page 2
required for lot splits within the Rural Reserve area or should the lot split approvals come
through the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council without a public hearing.
Councilmember Bukkila asked how frequently someone could do a lot split. If they do one lot
split is that all they can do or do they have to wait a certain period of time before doing another
one. Mr. Janish stated under their current ordinance it is a three year time period or can be done
in one year if a plat is done. He stated they do have some flexibility as far as the text amendment
goes, if they wanted to designate it to one lot split the Council could do that. Councilmember
Bukkila indicated she did not like that.
Mayor Trude thought this would open up the whole fringe issue and would chip away at the
edges of the Rural Reserve without a master plan. Commissioner Kohler agreed and stated it is
not just the chip away but it is also about what the master plan will be going forward. He
understood this area is supposed to be reserved for future urban development and if that is the
case they probably want to make sure that what is being done and how it is being split allows
them to move forward in the future with whatever the City Comprehensive Plan recommends. It
gives them the chance to review it and talk about it and apply a little bit of common sense. He is
not looking to make really strict rules but wants to leave the possibilities open in the future for
what the City needs to do. Mayor Trude agreed.
Commissioner Peterson asked if there is a difference between the notifications of local property
owners versus going through the whole process. Can people be notified and have a chance to
review it without going through the Planning and Zoning Commission, staff and City Council.
Still an opportunity for the property owners to find out what is coming their direction in their
area. Mr. Janish stated that is typically considered a neighborhood meeting and sometimes a
developer holds that meeting or City staff conducts the meeting to take notes as part of that
process. He thought if they were going to notify individuals of the meetings then maybe there
should be the public hearing process, follow that and then if there is some legality they can say
they followed a certain standard and gave a ten-day proper notice, advertised in the paper and
worse case, through the public hearing process you are going to notify more people, which is not
necessarily a bad thing.
Mayor Trude asked how many people were notified with the one that came through for the
Packer family. Mr. Janish stated with the Comprehensive Plan Amendment they went 750 feet
outside of the Rural Reserve boundary and there where about 130 notices that went out and they
did advertise it in the local newspaper as well. Mayor Trude noted that was because it affected
all of that zoning district. Mr. Janish stated that was correct and typically they would notice 500
feet.
Mr. Dickinson stated as they are dealing with the Rural Reserve and set for long term, from a
staff perspective, he was a little nervous bringing this forward without having full transparency
with everyone in the area. Councilmember Holthus agreed and thought the more transparency
they have the better it is for everybody, the fairer it is for everyone, the neighbors and future
developers who may have an interest in this area.
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes—March 28, 2017
Page 3
Commissioner Peterson stated in their meetings when there are cases involving the Rural
Reserve area there are generally more people at the meetings with more feedback. There is a lot
of interest in the transition areas.
Councilmember Bukkila stated she does not normally like long processes and costly steps for
people but because they do not really know how this is going to go and she did not see it
happening very frequently, in order to avoid the public hearing process they would have to have
a measured step that staff could follow and her concern is as they start to chunk away the parcels
and someone has forty acres and wants to put a ten acre strip on the side or the middle, staff tells
them no, they will appeal to the Council anyway. She did not know if they could put enough
criteria in there and she did not know if she wanted to enumerate what everyone can and cannot
do with this land because she thought every parcel will have some certain amount of subjectivity
to it and she would at least like it to be out in the public meeting section of prevue in terms of
how they make the decision.
Mayor Trude stated Councilmember Knight and herself sat through all of the Rural Reserve
planning discussions and that did involve hundreds of property owners to decide where the land
was set aside and their promise to the community was they would stop the chipping away at the
edges and they were going to have something done like The Lakes in Blaine because that is what
it is going to take to develop this area. She is worried if this is even appropriate in this area and
is there a way to even shut this down more so they don't end up with so many rural type parcels
on the edge so that the Rural Reserve does not happen. She wondered if they wanted to make it
even harder to do a lot split within the Rural Reserve. She wondered if they should go through
platting because they want to see a ghost plat for possible future development.
Mr. Janish stated if they do adopt the public hearing process, in this particular case, the Packer
Family moves forward with their two five acre parcels leaving thirty acres and if they wanted to
sell that off they would be restricted to that four for forty density or they could get two more
potential homes in there so they would not be able to come in and do some sort of urban
development because there would not be any municipal water or sewer to that site. He stated this
is meant to be a process for individuals to either provide some cash flow by splitting off a lot or
in this particular case, a family to do something with their land and to provide a home for other
family members. He thought that overall as they are planning it and they are analyzing it
whether it is through a lot split process or through a platting process, they want to analyze where
there is a potential for City infrastructure, what does the Comprehensive Plan identify for minor
and major collector roadways that are going through this area.
Mayor Trude wondered if they could do that with this process. Mr. Janish stated there are a
couple of different ways this could be done. One is through deed restrictions and the other is
through development review process. They would have to do the review process as they are
doing the splitting process.
Commissioner Kohler stated every one of these possible splits is going to be a little different and
they need to understand what the future plan is and if someone comes forward with a proposal,
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes —March 28, 2017
Page 4
they need to be able to check to make sure it meets the future plan.
A map with the aerial of property lines was displayed. The Council and Planning and Zoning
Commission discussed the future of the Rural Reserve area and how lot splits would affect it.
b. Atlas 14 Discussion
Mr. Berkowitz stated Atlas 14 is new rainfall distribution data compiled by a large number of
observation stations across the country; including Minnesota. The new data has resulted in an
increase in rainfall depths and run-off volumes. The Coon Creek Watershed District has
consulted with Wenck Associates to update the existing model with the new data. The new data
suggests the floodplain with Andover, especially within the Rural Reserve area, has grown
significantly.
Commissioner Kohler asked in terms of the floodplain, what impact does this have with
development going forward. Mr. Berkowitz stated if someone wants to build in a floodplain
fringe they need to mitigate it but if it is in the 100 -year floodplain than nothing can be built on
it.
Mr. Berkowitz showed a map of the current floodplain and the new map after Atlas 14 is
updated. He reviewed the differences with the Council and Planning and Zoning Commission.
He reviewed where the 100 -year floodplain exists.
Councilmember Bukkila stated when talking about expanding the culverts, it would decrease the
map but would have to affect farming soils as well. Mr. Berkowitz stated that is correct and
could potentially affect the farmer downstream. The plan is as they start getting into the
Comprehensive Plan update they would meet with all the farmers regarding this. He stated he
would anticipate every farmer in the area will have a development benefit by having the
floodplain reduced because when they sell off their property they will have more land to build
on.
Mr. Berkowitz stated there is a lot of information that needs to be reviewed. He stated what they
have is a draft of Atlas 14 and will come back to both the Planning and Zoning Commission and
City Council for more discussion. He stated what this does is drastically impact the way
Andover could potentially develop. Once the map changes are finalized the City Council is
going to have to make the decision of how they deal with certain areas.
Mayor Trude hoped as staff gets new information they look at some different options to bring to
the Planning and Zoning Commission for discussions as Comprehensive Plan review.
Mr. Janish continued to review the submittal process for lot splits within the Rural Reserve area.
Mayor Trude thought it would be important to have deed restrictions in order to have the ability
to connect roads in the future. Mr. Janish stated they could have the ability for requiring
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes —March 28, 2017
Page 5
easements on property for future development.
The Council, Planning and Zoning Commission and staff continued to review the potential
Packer Family lot split.
Mr. Janish thought the Council and Planning and Zoning Commission would like to see some
sort of blanket easement related to roadways and City utilities.
Mayor Trude wondered if they could take some property as park dedication.
The Planning and Zoning Commission and Council discussed the possibility of possible park
dedication areas within the Rural Reserve in case large development does not occur. Mr. Janish
indicated staff would need to discuss this further with the City Attorney.
Mr. Dickinson thought the more land you can put under the deed restriction the more flexibility
the City will have.
Mayor Trude thought her concerns can be addressed with the deed restrictions and they can get
the master planning started on the saved land as long as they can put some zoning overlay on it.
Mr. Dickinson stated this is really a tradeoff where the current property owners are giving up
some control of their own property by taking on the deed restrictions so they have the ability to
get some of what they want, which are two lots they can build on.
Councilmember Bukkila wondered how many forty acre parcels are around the Rural Reserve
that could potentially develop. Mr. Janish thought they will not see many because of the soil
mitigation costs. Mr. Dickinson thought there would be around 10 parcels.
Commissioner Nemeth thought this was more of a vision and those visions can always change
depending on who wants to sell and when they want to sell. He thought there were so many
variables and it is great to have the vision but it will probably not come to light.
Mr. Janish asked if the Council and Planning and Zoning Commission would like to see some
sort of ghost plat for future splits. The Council and Planning and Zoning Commission indicated
they would be in favor of that.
Mr. Janish stated they will come up with a hybrid lot split plan and thought the direction he was
receiving is they would not have to plat if in the Rural Reserve they do the hybrid lot split and
collect the same information as if they were doing a plat. Mr. Dickinson stated this would still
require a public hearing.
Ms. Mary Harrell, 14955 Ivywood Street, stated her house backs up to 149th Avenue and she has
a lot of concerns because it appears the northern route will be the connection through the Rural
Reserve in the future. She stated the southern route was going to come in by Walmart because it
is stubbed in already. Mr. Berkowitz stated that was the route that was approved prior to the
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes —March 28, 2017
Page 6
floodway information.
Ms. Harrell stated the concern is this is just a line on the map but the longer the line stays the
more significant they become. She stated 149s' Avenue is a minimum maintenance dirt road and
in terms of it being any kind of an east/west connection that would impact the homes that
surround it.
Mayor Trude stated Mr. Eveland filed to put his land into Ag. Preserve which will last for seven
years so that should ease Ms. Harrell's concerns.
Mayor Trude thanked Ms. Harrell for coming to the meeting to voice her concerns.
RECESSAND RECONVENE
The Council recessed at 7:38 p.m.
The Council reconvened at 7:50 p.m.
Commissioner Koehler asked in regard to the resolution, if there are lot splits, plats or something
in between will the Planning and Zoning Commission be able to review them. Mr. Janish stated
they would. Mr. Dickinson stated it will need to go through a public hearing process in order for
the changes to be made.
c. Flag Lot Discussion
Mr. Janish stated recently City staff has been contacted about the potential of creating a flag lot
in the rural residential area. Current code regulations do not allow flag lots since each lot is
required to have a width of 300 feet at the front yard setback and a minimum of 50 feet of road
frontage.
Mr. Janish reviewed what the definition of a flag lot is. He asked if the Council and Planning
and Zoning Commission would be open to allowing flag lots in Andover.
Mr. Janish noted if they did allow flag lots they could avoid some of the costs of public
roadways.
Councilmember Goodrich asked what did other cities that allow these find as downfalls. Mr.
Janish stated what he has found is townships and counties mostly allow for them and his past
experience as a county official is the reason they allowed for them is that the townships did not
want to maintain public roadways.
Commissioner Koehler stated there are many potential problems with a flag lot such as proximity
of houses, being able to see into each other's yard, blocking of driveway and emergency vehicles
cannot find the back lot many times.
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes—March 28, 2017
Page 7
Mr. Janish stated where they could run into potential issues on the code enforcement side is
being able to see things from the roadway.
Councilmember Knight thought if the City had these before and stopped allowing them why
would they want to start allowing them again and create possible issues.
Mayor Trude asked if the City could consider variance on this other than changing the code.
Councilmember Goodrich stated if there are not a lot of problems involved with doing a flag lot
then he would be in favor of it. Mayor Trude stated she has seen this in other cities where the
owners of the flag lots are relatives. She stated she could see this happening in Andover with
relatives and parents trying to help the child out. She would be willing to look at this if it were in
a rural area of Andover.
Mr. Dickinson stated he would not promote this going into any urban area and is not necessarily
in favor of entertaining it in the rural area but if they were going to look further at this then he
would suggest it be looked at only in the rural area of the City.
Commissioner Koehler asked if Fire Chief Streich could have input on this. Mr. Dickinson
stated they have talked to the Fire Chief about this and he lives on a flag lot and loves it. He
stated the key is to make sure that this is put in correctly and then long term what is the
maintenance on the access.
Mr. Berkowitz stated this could kill future development in some areas in the rural area. He
stated this could make it more difficult to try to develop it.
Commissioner Nemeth thought this should be decided on a case by case basis. Commissioner
Koehler agreed but thought there needed to be guidelines in place. Commissioner Nemeth stated
he would like to know what other cities do.
There was further discussion regarding issues with flag lots. Consensus was to not support flag
lots in Andover at this time.
Mr. Dickinson stated the applicant will be advised they need to go through the variance process
if they want to pursue.
d. Other Discussion
Commissioner Peterson thought for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process he would like
to have updates on the chapters before approval of them. Mayor Trude stated they did not have a
schedule but can give the Planning and Zoning Commission updates.
Mr. Dickinson stated the onset of the Atlas 14 is really a game changer and if this impacts the
Rural Reserve the potential densities and available acreage could be affected. He stated they are
in a waiting pattern for the data before anything can be done. When the information comes in
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes—March 28, 2017
Page 8
the Planning and Zoning Commission will be integral in the process.
Commissioner Koehler stated he would like to see more touch points with the City Council
moving forward because that helps the Planning and Zoning Commission. He thought they
should meet quarterly or twice a year.
Commissioner Sims thought if there was a way to get good discussion from staff about what the
Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed that would help the Council make their decision
better.
Commissioner Nemeth stated the Planning and Zoning Commission wants to be on the same
page as the City Council.
Commissioner Koehler asked if it would be beneficial to meet with the other Commissions and
Boards during the year as well and have an open type meeting. Mayor Trude thought that may
be too many meetings for everyone. Mr. Dickinson thought the Commissions could meet with
each other if they wanted to.
Commissioner Nemeth stated in regard to the newsletter he would like to see some articles from
department heads on what they are working on and why certain roads get picked for
reconstruction or other information the residents might want to know.
The City Council thanked the Planning and Zoning Commission for coming to the workshop
meeting.
DISCUSS A UTOMA TIC METER READING (AMR) FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES
Mr. Berkowitz stated the City Council is requested to discuss automatic meter reading for
commercial properties. He reviewed the staff report with the Council.
Councilmember Bukkila asked if Mr. Dickinson received her questions regarding this item. Mr.
Dickinson indicated the Council will receive the answers and additional information at the next
City Council meeting. This is just a review of this item. The plan is to pilot the AMR project
with commercial properties and then roll out to residential in a few years.
Councilmember Holthus asked how much this will save the City. Mr. Berkowitz stated they
have to schedule time with each business to go in and read the meters so this would reduce staff
time by ten hours per meter reading. This will provide more accurate and better service. Mr.
Berkowitz stated with automatic meter reading the meter can be read from the road.
2018-2022 CIP DISCUSSION & 2017 CIP PROGRESS REPORT
Mr. Dickinson reviewed the staff report with the Council.
DRAFT
CC Workshop Meeting Minutes
April 25, 2x17
1
2
3
4
5
6 ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING —APRIL 25, 2017
7 MINUTES
8
9
10 The Workshop Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Julie Trude,
11 April 25, 2017, 6:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover,
12 Minnesota.
13
14 Councilmembers present: Mike Knight, Sheri Bukkila (arrived at 6:15 p.m.), Valerie Holthus
15 and James Goodrich
16 Councilmember absent: None
17 Also present: City Administrator, Jim Dickinson
18 Community Development Director, Joe Janish
19 Public Works Director/City Engineer, David Berkowitz
20 City Attorney, Scott Baumgartner
21 Others
22
23
24 DISCUSS ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO REGULATE DRUG PARAPHERNALIA
25
26 City Attorney Baumgartner explained cities are starting to develop ordinances that regulate drug
27 paraphernalia.
28
29 City Attorney Baumgartner reviewed the staff report with the Council.
30
31 Mayor Trude thought they should add a paragraph about allowing items that are licensed by the
32 State of Minnesota for medicinal purposes. She thought they should add a section for people
33 who are legally growing, stating "This does not apply if you are licensed by the State of
34 Minnesota to produce..." City Attorney Baumgartner stated this does not have to do with
35 Marijuana, it has to do with paraphernalia. Mayor Trude stated they needed to make sure the
36 City makes an exception for people who are allowed by the State to grow for medicinal
37 purposes. City Attorney Baumgartner noted on page three under C and D, it talks about in
38 violation of MN State Chapter 152, which has the exclusions and talks about pharmaceutical
39 items as well.
40
41 Councilmember Holthus asked if Forest Lake adopted a similar ordinance because a shop that
42 was there was the same type of shop as the shop in Anoka and it is now closed. City Attorney
43 Baumgartner was not sure if Forest Lake implemented an ordinance but he did know Forest Lake
44 did implement an ordinance of some sort. He chose to go with Morehead's' model because it
45 had been tested and more closely resembled the Federal model. Since the Morehead model had
46 already been tested in court along with the Federal model they had precedent had it been
47 challenged, which it was, that they could then fall back on the Federal model. He knew that a lot
48 of cities are going in the direction of an ordinance like the one in Anoka.
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes—April 25, 2017
Page 2
1
2 Councilmember Bukkila arrived at 6:15 p.m.
3
4 City Attorney Baumgartner stated before Anoka adopted this ordinance they reached out to all of
5 the businesses that had items or could potentially have items and gave them a period of time to
6 remove their inventory out before the ordinance went into effect.
7
8 Mayor Trude stated sometimes gas stations have paraphernalia and wondered if they are aware
9 of any of that going on in Andover. City Attorney Baumgartner stated he is not aware of
10 anything in Andover at this time.
11
12 The Council was in support of drafting an ordinance and sending it through the Planning and
13 Zoning Commission for Council review and approval.
14
15 Mayor Trude asked what kind of things were being prosecuted in Andover. Mr. Baumgartner
16 stated they have been prosecuting thefts from Walmart. He reviewed some things happening in
17 the City that he has dealt with.
18
19 DISCUSS ZONING TEXTAMENDMENTS FOR RURAL RESERVE
20
21 Mr. Janish explained there has been discussions going on regarding this item. He reviewed the
22 staff report with the Council.
23
24 Mr. Janish asked the Council if they wanted to keep item 13-1B-3: A4 or remove it. Mayor
25 Trude stated this was crafted so people would not come in and flip the property. She thought
26 that section needed to be adjusted. Mr. Janish stated he could do that.
27
28 Mr. Janish reviewed the zoning text amendments with the Council.
29
30 Mr. Janish stated regarding Item K: When applicable, a blanket easement stating that future
31 roads, trails, city utilities, and future park areas may be located in this area on remnant parcel.
32 He stated his concern with this is that this does allow the City, at a later date, to come through
33 and put a road through the parcel and the easement would allow the City to "take the road" and
34 put the road in and the property owner might not be compensated.
35
36 Councilmember Bukkila stated that is what she is concerned with. Mr. Dickinson stated one of
37 the things he asked is how many other cities are doing blanket type easements and Mr. Janish did
38 not find any. Mayor Trude asked how they guarantee this will not happen. She wondered how
39 they would solve the problem. She stated if this was platted they would be giving up their land
40 for the roads and parks. She stated they would be giving up their land for the road because they
41 need access for their homes. There is a community interest at stake. Mr. Janish stated what
42 other communities are doing is they are placing a deed restriction on the property saying that it
43 can't be split again until urban services are provided.
44 There was discussion between staff and Council regarding possible ways to split 40 acres in
45 order to allow future development.
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes—April 25, 2017
Page 3
1
2 Mayor Trude asked if the easement would be over the top of the properties and not pushed to the
3 edge of the properties. Mr. Janish stated if that is where the road would go.
4
5 Discussion continued regarding future lot splits within the Rural Reserve.
6
7 Councilmember Bukkila stated she had a problem with a blanket easement because wouldn't it
8 go on recorded documents with the land. It is one thing to structure the code to prevent any
9 building in an area before there is a grand plan but to legally encumber the acreage with
10 easements does not seem right. City Attorney Baumgartner stated the reason he has an issue
11 with this is how do they come up with a legal description to record the easement. He stated they
12 could do an easement over the entire property but at some point they will need to release a
13 portion of that easement over which it will need to be surveyed to get the legal description.
14 Mayor Trude thought they could release the easement at that point because it is a bargaining
15 process. City Attorney Baumgartner stated at some point they are going to have to identify
16 somehow what the legal description for the easement is. If they want to throw an easement over
17 the entire parcel now before it is split they will still need to identify if they want to split the
18 parcel. There will need to be surveying done to vacate that portion of the blanket easement.
19 Mayor Trude asked if they could vacate the easement on the five acre parcels where the homes
20 will go.
21
22 There was further discussion regarding blanket easements.
23
24 Mr. Berkowitz explained how developments go about getting plat approval with easements. He
25 stated if the city does not grab the easement then it makes it harder to develop in the future.
26
27 Mr. Janish stated the original intent of the blanket easement was to try to minimize someone
28 from putting something in the way of future development. Councilmember Bukkila gave an
29 example of issues people might have with using their land with a blanket easement on their land
30 in the Rural Reserve. City Attorney Baumgartner stated the property owner could have an
31 encroachment agreement with the City on the land. Mayor Trude stated if there was not any
32 easement on the property then the City loses their bargaining. They are trying to bargain to
33 protect the master plan and the landowners all bought into that. Mr. Janish stated an
34 encroachment agreement could be done in order to allow buildings on structures with a blanket
35 easement.
36
37 Further discussion ensued between staff and the Council regarding easements and encroachment
38 agreements.
39
40 Mr. Jake Packer and Mr. John Packer, 3074 161" Avenue NW, stated they have two forty acre
41 parcels with two buildable lots with two five acre parcels and as far as the easement goes they
42 are not comfortable with that and did not know why they could not leave a chunk of land open.
43 City Attorney Baumgartner stated the problem with that is if they wanted to sell off another five
44 acres of the forty acres the City would have no way to say they cannot do that without a blanket
45 easement, the future development may never happen.
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes —April 25, 2017
Page 4
1
2 Mr. Packer stated he understood that but it is tough for them and they felt like their hands are
3 being tied. Mayor Trude stated they are being allowed to build on ten acres of the forty acres
4 available. She thought they needed to have a master plan for the Rural Reserve but they want to
5 allow families to build on part of their land.
6
7 The Council, staff and the Packers reviewed possibilities that could be done on their property and
8 in the Rural Reserve District including deed restrictions. City Attorney Baumgartner stated he
9 would need to review language regarding deed restrictions and see how that would work.
10
11 Mayor Trude asked if there was ever discussion regarding removing some land out of the Rural
12 Reserve because of close access to City sewer and water. She wondered if they could apply
13 some kind of process in their code that indicates it no longer makes sense. Mr. Janish stated with
14 Atlas 14 discussion that is where a lot of the discussion is going to be. He stated all of the
15 meetings they have been doing may not even be valid discussions when they start working on the
16 next update because of Atlas 14 and other new rules, the Rural Reserve may not be as
17 developable as they thought in the past.
18
19 Mayor Trude thought if things were to change they could vacate easements based on new
20 discoveries and circumstances. Mr. Berkowitz agreed.
21
22 City Attorney Baumgartner stated the City wants to allow residents to do what they want with
23 their property but the City has an obligation to the community to plan for what may happen
24 twenty years down the road and the hard part is trying to predict what is going to happen there
25 because there is nothing there at this time. They want to make sure they do not box in future
26 development in the area which is the tough part.
27
28 Mr. Packer wondered if the City could add some blanket language and approve items on a case
29 by case situation. City Attorney Baumgartner stated when they put together an ordinance they
30 should apply it universally otherwise you get discriminatory enforcement. They can look at
31 certain things back to back but in the end, it should all come together under that ordinance and
32 has to be applicable. They need to treat people similarly.
33
34 Mr. Berkowitz thought the best solution would be to have a blanket easement with an
35 encroachment agreement. Mr. Dickinson stated they could look at a floating easement with an
36 encroachment agreement if they want a particular use of the easement area. He stated the
37 easement could move within the property so it is not specified. City Attorney Baumgartner
38 stated they would not need an encroachment agreement unless or until they want to put
39 something on the land that would encroach into the easement.
40
41 Councilmember Bukkila indicated she was not a fan of this plan. Councilmember Goodrich
42 agreed and stated he needed more information and history before making a decision. Mr.
43 Dickinson stated staff will get some examples of deed restrictions and bring that back to the
44 Council for further discussion.
45
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes—April 25, 2017
Page 5
1 Mr. Janish stated they could allow a change to the language in the ordinance, remove the
2 splitting of property additionally each year and place either an easement or some sort of
3 restriction over the remnant parcel so they get a one-time split in the Rural Reserve and then try
4 to sort it out as part of their Comprehensive Plan update because they may come back and
5 change the entire area again once they find out how Atlas 14 will affect this area. He noted he
6 would work with the City Attorney on language.
8 Councilmember Holthus asked if this would allow the Packer family to build. Mr. Janish stated
9 it should. It would restrict the remnant piece unless the entire parcel is sold and they want to
10 plan a development.
11
12 Mayor Trude, Councilmembers Holthus and Knight were in favor of moving this forward.
13
14 Mr. Packer thought they may be willing to allow the easement but he wondered what they are
15 giving up to do that. Mr. Baumgartner stated they are allowing the City the opportunity to place
16 the road and easement in there at some point when the entire property becomes developable.
17
18 Mayor Trude stated she would like to see three goals: 1. Allow the Packers to build, 2. Continue
19 on the path they started with the Met Council approvals that are permitted and 3. Make sure there
20 is room for things to happen in the future that are not going to be impeded by today's actions.
21
22 Mr. Janish stated as a part of the Comprehensive Plan update, it is going to determine what is
23 going to happen in this area. Mr. Berkowitz noted after the update with Atlas 14 staff may even
24 come back to the Council looking for a vacation of the easement they put on the property.
25
26 Councilmember Bukkila indicated she wanted more information before making a final decision.
27 Councilmember Goodrich agreed. Councilmember Bukkila stated even if Mr. Packer is willing
28 to agree to this easement she acknowledges there are other property owners who have interest as
29 well and she is trying to protect them as well.
30
31 Mayor Trude stated the entire Rural Reserve is restricted at this point. Councilmember Bukkila
32 noted the property owners can still use the land. Mayor Trude stated if they move towards the
33 plan that was started two months ago the property owners will have more rights than they do
34 now. Councilmember Bukkila stated right now the property owners can build an accessory
35 building on their property but if there were an easement placed on the property then according to
36 the code they could not build at all on the easement. She stated she would prefer a method that
37 would not include encroachment so that a property owner could have full use of their land. She
38 would like staff to look to see if there are alternative options.
39
40 Mr. Dickinson stated they will look for the deed restriction component. He noted an easement is
41 a form of a deed restriction. City Attorney Baumgartner stated an easement is an interest in
42 property, a deed restriction is only as good as whoever holds that deed, that is the problem he has
43 with it. Mr. Dickinson stated they need to look at what the County recorder will accept. For the
44 most part Counties will not record those things unless it is signed off by the municipalities and
45 that is really where the City wants to get to. City Attorney Baumgartner stated that is what he
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes—April 25, 2017
Page 6
1 wants to see.
2
3 Mayor Trude asked when the City went to the Met Council and asked to move down this path,
4 what was on their list that the City had to do. Mr. Janish stated it is a deed restriction of some
5 manner to prevent the density and preserve that future development possibility.
6
7 Mr. Packer stated they do not necessarily want the easement, if there is another way to do it that
8 would be the way they would want to go but if it ends up that it is the only way to get it done
9 then they may need to go along with it. He asked for a status update on the Comprehensive Plan
10 amendment. Mr. Janish stated he has not heard from the Met Council yet. He reviewed the
11 process with Mr. Packer and the Council.
12
13 Mr. Packer stated they are looking to move forward with building as soon as possible. Staff
14 reviewed a possible timeline of actions that need to occur before building can happen. Mr.
15 Dickinson stated they need to figure out Item K in the staff report that talks about blanket
16 easements on the property.
17
18 Councilmember Goodrich stated he did not want to hold the Packers back from building if the
19 only issue is Item K. Mr. Dickinson stated he would talk to the Packers and help them to work
20 out a timeframe to build.
21
22 DISCUSS STORAGE UNITS (PODS) IN CITYPARKS & RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
23
24 Mr. Berkowitz explained the City Council is requested to discuss portable storage containers,
25 often referred to as PODS, in City parks and residential districts.
26
27 Mr. Berkowitz reviewed the staff report.
28
29 Mr. Berkowitz asked if the Council supported permanent PODS in the City. Council consensus
30 was not to allow them.
31
32 Mr. Berkowitz asked if the City Council supported a timeframe for the athletic associations to
33 get rid of their current PODS. Councilmember Holthus understood why they need them. Mr.
34 Berkowitz stated staff discussed giving them three to five years to get rid of the PODS. Mayor
35 Trude disagreed and stated five years was a long time for them to find alternative storage. She
36 thought a shed looked better than PODS. Mr. Berkowitz stated it is up to the Council to decide
37 what a reasonable timeframe is for the associations to raise funds to build a structure for storage.
38
39 Councilmember Bukkila stated her issue is the burden on one association for multiple structures.
40 If it was only one park and one organization she would agree to three years but if one
41 organization had something in two or more parks then she would be more sympathetic to a
42 longer timeframe to plan out multiple structures.
43
44 Mr. Berkowitz reviewed where the PODS are located at. He noted the Andover Baseball
45 Association wants to move a POD from the high school to Sunshine Park and thought the City
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes—April 25, 2017
Page 7
1 Council would not be in favor of that. The Council agreed. Mr. Berkowitz stated the Andover
2 Football Association has one at Prairie Knoll Park during the season. He stated they could have
3 multiple associations put their resources together and build one structure at the parks.
4
5 Councilmember Holthus thought the associations need to clean out the buildings and see what
6 their needs are. Mr. Berkowitz stated they would need to have a structure at each park to house
7 the equipment needed for that park so he thought the Council should give them enough time to
8 figure out what their full needs are and how they can do it efficiently so they can raise money,
9 design and build a structure so it works for them for a long time.
10
11 Councilmember Bukkila thought the associations should be given twelve months to make a plan
12 and tell the Council what they would like to see before a decision is made by the Council. She
13 stated she wanted the associations to react and not put it off.
14
15 Councilmember Knight asked if some of the items being stored at the parks was City owned.
16 Mr. Berkowitz stated the associations are now buying their own equipment to use at the parks so
17 the City does not have any equipment that is stored. Mayor Trude stated that takes a big load off
18 of the City, she wondered if there was a way to find a way to build some little sheds with money
19 from their reserves to store equipment so the parks look better. Mr. Berkowitz stated he would
20 need to go to the Park and Recreation Commission to see how they would weigh in on a
21 recommendation for that.
22
23 Councilmember Goodrich asked if they could screen the PODS with some sort of nice fencing so
24 they cannot be seen. Mayor Trude stated she liked that idea.
25
26 Councilmember Bukkila stated she is not ready to put a drop -dead date on this, she would like to
27 get some feedback from the associations on what they propose. Councilmember Holthus
28 suggested staff go look at the buildings and see what the associations have in them to see how
29 space can be better utilized.
30
31 Mr. Berkowitz asked if there was support for the associations to come back after twelve months
32 with a storage plan. Council agreed.
33
34 Mayor Trude suggested staff work with the associations on getting a plan together.
35
36 Mr. Berkowitz asked if the Council was in favor of using park dedication money to fund the
37 storage. Mayor Trude stated she is in favor of doing this. The rest of the Council is against.
38
39 The Council is not in favor of permanent PODS in residential use. The Council is in favor of
40 temporary PODS in residential use. Councilmember Bukkila stated she would be in favor of
41 temporary storage if there is an open construction permit. Mr. Dickinson noted construction
42 permits could be open for years. Councilmember Goodrich asked what other cities do. Mr.
43 Dickinson stated most do not allow them at all or for only ninety days. Mayor Trude thought
44 they should start with ninety days. Mr. Berkowitz stated if allowed there would need to be an
45 ordinance change because they currently do not allow anything like that in the City. He stated
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes—April 25, 2017
Page 8
staff will work on language change and bring it back for Council review. Councilmember
Bukkila stated there needed to be some language stipulating ninety days in total so it does not
disappear for one day and then come back again for another ninety days.
5 Mr. Berkowitz noted there are not any restrictions on five acres or more. The majority of the
6 Council did not have an issue with that. Mayor Trude is not sure if she wanted that because then
7 the property owner can have as many of them as they want and then it starts to look bad. Mr.
8 Janish thought there needed to be some type of screening on those sites. Mayor Trude stated she
9 did not support allowing them on five acres or more.
10
11 CLOCKTOWER COMMONSAMENDMENT
12
13 Mr. Janish stated this is in regard to the Clocktower Commons PUD amendment. He passed out
14 a building design and stated the new building they are proposing is mostly rock face block and
15 he is requesting the Council review the building fagade and indicate any changes that should be
16 made to the building. Mr. Dickinson stated according to the PUD all the buildings need to look
17 alike in appearance.
18
19 The City Council thought the new building fagade looked better than some of the existing
20 buildings. They thought maybe there could be the same style of roofing or closer looking brick
21 to the color in the design of the existing buildings.
22
23 2018 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION
24
25 Mr. Dickinson reviewed the staff report.
26
27 2017BUDGETPROGRESSREPORTS
28
29 Mr. Dickinson reviewed the staff report.
30
31 2017 CITYINVESTMENTS REVIEW
32
33 Mr. Dickinson reviewed the staff report.
34
35
36 OTHER TOPICS.
37
38 TRAFFICREDIRECTIONFROMBUNKER LAKE BOULEVARD
39 Mayor Trude stated she has had voicemails and emails regarding Bunker Lake
40 Boulevard. A resident is even wondered if they could close down Butternut Street during
41 the construction because of excessive traffic going into residential areas. Councilmember
42 Bukkila stated the same thing happened with the Hanson Boulevard construction and they
43 have to just put up with it.
44
45 Mayor Trude told the resident to contact the County and see what they could do about it
DRAFT
Sample Easement
TEMPORARY ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT/DRAINAGE
AND UTILITY EASEMENT
]KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT, for valuable consideration,
("Grantor"), hereby grants, sells, and conveys to the CITY OF ANDOVER, a
Minnesota municipal corporation ("Grantee"), a permanent easement for future roadway,
drainage and utility purposes, including, without limitation, the construction, maintenance, repair
and replacement thereof, and uses incident thereto ("Easement"), in, under and upon the real
property, in Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows:
INSERT LEGAL ("Property")
Further, the right is hereby granted to the Grantee to restrict the further development of said
Property. This Easement or portion(s) of said Easement can be vacated by the Grantee upon:
1. Rezoning of the Property to:
a. a commercial zoning classification;
b. an industrial zoning classification;
c. a denser residential development;
2. A change in the City of Andover's Comprehensive Plan that no
longer considers the Property as being in the Rural Reserve;
3. Municipal water and sewer is extended to the Property;
4. A defined location for the Easement has been determined due to
development occurring on and/or around the Property.
Grantor covenants that he is the owner of the easement area and has the right, title, and capacity
to grant the easement described above.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME, together with all the hereditaments and
appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anyway appertaining to the said Grantee, forever, for
said roadway, drainage and utility purposes.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands on or as of the date
opposite their respective signatures.
RR Temporary Easement
Dated: 2017 By:,
Total Consideration: One and 00/100 Dollars ($1.00)
State Deed Tax Due: None
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2017,
by , who has caused these presents to be executed or has set his hand the day
and year first above written.
Notary Public
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Andover, County of Anoka, State of
Minnesota, has accepted on , 2017, the above described easement in this document.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Dated: 2017 By:,
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
Telephone: 763-755-5100
RR Temporary Easement
DRAFT
Sample Development Agreement
RESTRICTION OF DEVELOPMENT
DECLARATION AGREEMENT
This RESTRICTION OF DEVELOPMENT DECLARATION AGREEMENT
("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between, ,
("Owner"), and the City of Andover, a Minnesota
municipal corporation, 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, Minnesota 55304 ("City"), and is
effective as of the date of the last signature of the parties..
WHEREAS, Owner is the fee owner of the property legally described on attached
Exhibit A ("Property"); and
WHEREAS, the City of Andover's 2008 Comprehensive Plan had a restriction on lot
splits and subdivisions of less than one parcel per twenty acres, in the Rural Reserve; and
WHEREAS, this restriction on lot splits and subdivisions was implemented to prevent
this area from rural residential development that would preclude orderly future MUSA
expansion; and
WHEREAS, the City of Andover has amended their Comprehensive Plan to prohibit
lot splits and subdivisions of less than one parcel per ten acres within the Rural Reserve; and
WHEREAS, the City of Andover's Comprehensive Plan amendment allows for lot
sizes of 5 acres within the Rural Reserve with conditions; and
WHEREAS, the conditions to be attached relative to allowing lot splits creating lot
sizes of 5 acres within the Rural Reserve are necessary to continue to maintain orderly future
MUSA expansion; and
WHEREAS, one of the conditions necessary in order to maintain orderly future
MUSA expansion, is the inclusion of restrictions on the placement of structures within the
subdivided parcels; and
1
WHEREAS, these restrictions will prevent the impediment of future MUSA
expansion; and
WHEREAS, in connection with an application by Owner for
, the City has required, as a condition of approval, the
execution and recording of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, as a condition of securing the benefits and advantages of the City's
approval of Owner's application, Owner desires to subject the Property to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, Owner declares that the Property is, and shall be, held,
transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the terms and conditions of this
Agreement.
1. Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have
the meanings given.
1.1. "Home(s)" means a residential building or portion thereof intended for
occupancy by a family.
1.2. "Family" means an individual or two (2) or more persons related by
blood, marriage or adoption living together; or a group of not more
than five (5) persons who need not be related by blood, marriage or
adoption, dwelling unit, exclusive of usual servants.
2. Owner's Obligations.
2.1. The Owner shall not construct a Home within the area described in
exhibit A.
2.2 The Owner shall not further subdivide the Property until the Property is
released from this Agreement.
3. Enforcement.
3.1. By entering into this Agreement, Owner acknowledges that the City
has a valuable and enforceable interest in the Property and that this
Agreement may be enforced by the City to the fullest extent allowed by
law. Owner agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the
City in defense or enforcement of this Agreement, or any portion thereof,
including court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.
2
4. Miscellaneous.
4.1. No Waiver. Failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement upon a
violation of it will not be deemed a waiver of the right to do so as to
that or any subsequent violation.
4.2. Validity. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph
or phrase in this Agreement is for any reason held to be invalid by a court
of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the
other provisions of the Agreement.
4.3. Duration of Agreement. The agreement granted herein shall remain
in effect until:
4.3.1 Rezoning of the Property to a commercial zoning classification;
4.3.2 Rezoning of the Property to an industrial zoning classification;
4.3.3 Rezoning of the Property to a denser residential development;
4.3.4 A change in the City of Andover's Comprehensive Plan that no
longer considers the Property as being in the Rural Reserve;
4.3.5 Municipal water and sewer is extended to the Property;
4.4. Warranty of Owner. The Owner warrants that it is the owner of a fee
simple interest in the Property, and that it has the right to enter into this
Agreement.
4.5. Binding Effect. The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of
the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any
part of the Property and shall be deemed covenants running with the land.
Owner agrees that the City shall have the right to record a copy of this
Agreement with the Anoka County Recorder to give notice to future
purchasers and owners. This shall be recorded against the Property.
4.6. Notices. Whenever in this Agreement it shall be required or permitted that
notice or demand be given or served by either party to this Agreement to or
on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or
mailed by United States mail to the addresses hereinbefore set forth on Page
1 by certified mail (return receipt requested). Such notice or demand shall
be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the
mail in accordance with the above. The addresses of the parties hereto are
as set forth on Page 1 until changed by notice given as above.
4.7. Amendments. This Agreement may not be amended without the prior
written approval of the City.
4.8. Clerical Revisions. In the event that any technical or clerical revisions are
needed in this document or if for any reason the County Recorder deems the
Agreement un -recordable, Owner shall cooperate with the City in the
execution or amendment of any revised agreement.
OWNER
By:
Its:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of
2017, by I the
on behalf of
Notary Public
CITY OF ANDOVER
in
to
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
Julie Trude, Mayor
Michelle Hartner, Deputy City Clerk
57y
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2017, by Julie Trude and Michelle Hartner, the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk
of the City of Andover, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, on behalf of the
municipal corporation.
Notary Public
rd
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
Telephone: 763-755-5100
For City use only: l
Planning File #
Date of Council approval
ID►i:1 : e
Description of the Pro
CONSENT
The undersigned Mortgagee of the real estate described in the attached instrument
pursuant to the Mortgage recorded as Document No. in the office of the Anoka
County Recorder's Office, hereby joins in and consents to all of the terms and provisions
contained in the attached Restriction of Development Declaration Agreement ("Agreement").
The undersigned Mortgagee further agrees that its interest in the property covered by the
Mortgage is subject to the Agreement and to all of the terms and provisions contained in it and
agrees that if the Mortgagee forecloses its mortgage(s) on the property, or takes a deed in lieu of
foreclosure, the Mortgagee will take title subject to the Agreement.
By:
Its:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF 1
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of
20_ , by the of
on behalf of the corporation .
Notary Public
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. XX SUMMARY
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE TITLE 12 ZONING REGULATIONS: 12-3 ZONING
DISTRICTS AND MAPS, SECTION 12-12 PERMITTED, PERMITTED ASSCESSORY,
CONDITIONAL, INTERIM AND PROHIBITED USES CITY CODE; TITLE 13 PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT: 13-1 SPLITTING LOTS, PARCELS OR TRACTS OF LAND
STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION AND POLICY
Statutory Authorization
This ordinance amendment is adopted pursuant to the authorization and policies contained in Minnesota
Statute 412.
Policy
The purpose of these regulations is to protect the public health, safety and welfare. The proposed amendment
to City Code Title 12 establishes the RR — Rural Reserve Residential District and uses allowed within the
district; Title 13 establishes lot split provisions within the RR — Rural Reserve Residential District in the City
of Andover.
GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS
Jurisdiction
The provisions of this ordinance shall apply to the City of Andover.
Enforcement
The City Administrator or his/her designee shall have the authority to enforce the provisions of this
ordinance.
Interpretation
Interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance shall be held to be the minimum requirements and shall be
liberally construed in the favor of the governing body.
A printed copy of this ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular hours of the City
Clerk.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 6th day of June, 2017.
ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER
Michelle Hartner, Deputy City Clerk Julie Trude, Mayor
pi
EM
4:
• ••!,L
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Councilmember's
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
Joe Janish, Community Development
FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner
SUBJECT: Rezone Rl — Single Family Rural to RR — Rural Reserve Residential - Planning
DATE: June 6, 2017
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is asked to review the rezoning of lands designated as Rural Reserve from R
— Single Family Rural to RR — Rural Reserve Residential. Attached is the Andover Zoning Map
showing the proposed zoning change.
DISCUSSION
The rezoning of the rural reserve area coincides with the proposed Comprehensive Plan
Amendment and Zoning Text Amendments the Planning and Zoning Commission and City
Council previously reviewed.
As with all rezonings, the City shall find one of the two following findings that are provided by
state statute:
• The original zoning was in error.
• The character of the area or times and conditions have changed to such an extent
to warrant the rezoning.
In this case, times and conditions have changed. The Andover Comprehensive Plan is in the
process of being amended. The amendment will allow for property owners to have up to 1 unit
per 10 acres vs. the historical requirement of 1 unit per 20 acres. This amendment is consistent
with Metropolitan Council policies for the rural reserve area.
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
On May 24, 2017, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing regarding the
CUP request in which there was public input. The majority of the comments were in regard to
the future development to urban densities. A draft of the meeting minutes have been attached for
your review.
The Commission recommended approval on a 4-0 (3 absent) vote. The Commission briefly
discussed the following:
Clarification that the rezoning of the properties is not so it can be developed into urban
lots, as some residents have mentioned.
0 There is much more research needed to determine the feasibility of urban development.
• At this time, staff or the Commissioners cannot comment on how or when the properties
will be developed at urban densities.
ACTION REQUESTED
The City Council is asked to approve the rezoning request based on the fact that the rezoning
will provide provisions to regulate the subdivision of lands within the Rural Reserve Residential
District and ensure compliance with City Codes and the Andover Comprehensive Plan.
Attachments
Ordinance Amendment
Draft May 24, 2017 PZ Meeting Minutes
Proposed Zoning Map
Res�y bm
Stephan re L. Hanson
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE TITLE 12-3-4, ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE
CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
City Code 12-3-4, The Zoning District Map of the City of Andover is hereby amended as follows:
1. Rezone land from R-1, Single Family Rural Residential to RR, Single Family Rural Reserve
Residential on approximately 1,000 acres shown on Attachment A and legally described as the
following:
South Half of Section 16, Township 32 Range 24 Andover; and,
North Half Section 21 Township 32 Range 24 Andover, Except: Wittington Ridge and those parcels
located in Woodland Estates 6d' Addition; and,
South Half Section 21 Township 32 Range 24 Andover, Except: Woodland Estates 6th Addition;
Woodland Estates 5`h Addition; Woodland Estates 3`d Addition; Kadlec Estates; East Round Lake Estates;
The West 720 Feet of the North 330 Feet of South 660 feet of NW 1/4 of SW '/a of Section 21, Township
32, Range 24; THE South 330 Feet of West 720 feet ofNW1/4 OF SWIA of Section 21 Township 32
Range 24; North 165 Feet of the West 396 feet of the NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Section 21 Township 32 Range
24; and,
West Half of North Half of Section 28 Township 32 Range 24 Andover Except: Fields Addition;
CreekRidge Estates; and,
THAT PRT OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 LYG NLY & WLY OF THE FOL DESC LINE COM AT
THE NE COR OF SD NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4, TH S 88 DEG 36 MIN 09 SEC W (ASSMD BRG) ALG
THE N LINE THEREOF 263.96 FT TO THE ACT POB OF LINE TO BE DESC, TH S 67 DEG 12 MIN
47 SEC W 390.33 FT, TH S 52 DEG 12 MIN 47 SEC W 128.00 FT, TH S 36 DEG 12 MIN 47 SEC W
60 FT TH S 23 DEG 12 MIN 47 SEC W 120.00 FT, TH S 36 DEG 32 MIN 47 SEC W755.00 FT, TH S 0
DEG 47 MIN 13 SEC E 45.00 FT, TH S 27 DEG 07 MIN 13 SEC E 119.81 FT TO THE C/L OF S
COON CREEK DR TH S 69 DEG 31 MIN 37 SEC W ALG SD C/L 63.89 FT, TH WLY ALG SD C/L &
ALG A TAN CURTO THE RT HAV A RAD OF 800 FT & A CENT ANG OF 04 DEG 01 MIN 39 SEC
56.23 FT TO THE W LINE OF SD NW 1/4 OF THE SWI/4 & SD LINE THERE TERM AT A PT
1160.97 FT SLY OF THE NW COR OF SD 1/4 1/4 EX RDS SUBJ TO EASE OF REC; and,
THAT PRT OF GOVT LOT 5 SEC 29 T32 R24 LYG S OF A LINE DESC AS FOL: COM AT A PT ON
THE E LINE OF SD GOVT LOT 692 FT S OF THE NE COR OF SD SEC, TH WLY AT RT ANG TO
SD E LINE TO THE ELY R/W LINE OF CSAHNO 9 (AKA ROUND LAKE BLVD) & THERE TERM,
& LYG N OF A LINE PRLL/W S LINE OF SD GOVT LOT & EXT W FROM THE SW COR OF THE
NW 1/4 OF THE NWl/4 OF SEC 28-32-24 TO THE ELY R/W LINE OF SD CSAH NO 9 & LYG SELY
OF SD CSAH NO 9; EX RD; SUBJ TO EASE OF RFC; AND,
ALL THAT PRT OF GOVT LOT 5 SEC 29 TWP 32 RGE 24 DESC AS FOL: BEG AT MOST NLY
COR OF LOT 17 BLK 3 CREEKRIDGE ESTATES, TH S 06 DEG 34 MIN 58 SEC W ALG E LINE OF
SD LOT 17 118.13 FT, TH S 89 DEG 20 MIN12 SEC E 263.71 FT, TH N 00 DEG 26 MIN 41 SEC W
491.56 FT +OR- TO A LINE DRAWN WLY PRLL/W S LINE OF SD GOVT LOT 5 FROM SW COR
OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC 28 TWP 32 RGE 24, TH WLY ALG SD PRLL LINE 163.46FT +OR -
TO SELY LINE OF REV OF SHEET 2 & 3 ANOKA CO HWY R/W PLAT NO 14, TH SWLY ALG SD
SELY LINE 90.44 FT +OR- TO N LINE OF LOT 18 BLK 3 CREEKRIDGE ESTATES, TH ELY ALG
SD N LINE 15.45 FT TO E LINE OFSD LOT 18, TH SLY ALG SD E LINE 309.80 FT TO POB, SUBJ
TO EASE OF REC; AND,
THAT PRT OF GOVT LOT 5 SEC 29 TWP 32 RGE 24 LYG SLY OF A LINE DRAWN PRLL/W S
LINE OF SD GOVT LOT 5 FROM SW COR OF NWl/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC 28 TWP 32 RGE 24 &
LYG ELY OF FOL DESC LINE: BEG AT A PT ON SLINE OF SD GOVT LOT 5 615. FT WLY OF SE
COR THEREOF, TH N 0 DEG 00 MIN 52 SEC W, ASSD BRG, PRLL/W E LINE OF SD GOVT LOT
5 610.31 FT, TH S 89 DEG 55 MIN E 49.64 FT, TH N 10 DEG 27 MIN 58 SEC W 171.60FT, TH N 05
DEG 46 MIN 08 SEC E 473.09 FT, TH N 89 DEG 55 MIN W 15.45 FT TO SELY R/W LINE OF
ANOKA CO HWY R/W PLAT NO 14, TH NELY ALG SELY LINE 90.44 FT TO PT OF INTER/W A
LINE DRAWN PRLL/W S LINE OFSD GOVT LOT 5 FROM SW COR OF NWl/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC
28 & SD LINE THERE TERM, EX THAT PRT THEREOF DESC AS FOL: BEG AT MOST NLY COR
OF LOT 17 BLK 3 CREEKRIDGE ESTATES, TH S 06 DEG 34 MIN 58 SEC W ALG ELINE OF SD
LOT 17 118.13 FT, TH S 89 DEG 20 MIN 12 SEC E 263.71 FT, TH N 00 DEG 26 MIN 41 SEC W
491.56 FT +OR- TO A LINE DRAWN WLY PRLL/W S LINE OF SD GOVT LOT 5 FROM SW COR
OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SEC28 TWP 32 RGE 24, TH WLY ALG SD PRLL/W 163.46 FT +OR- TO
SELY LINE OF REV OF SHEETS 2 & 3 ANOKA CO HWY R/W PLAT NO 14, TH S WLY ALG SD
SELY LINE 90.44 FT +OR- TO N LINE OF LOT 18 BLK 3 CREEKRIDGEESTATES, TH ELY ALG
SD N LINE 15.45 FT TO E LINE OF SD LOT 18, TH SLY ALG SD E LINE 309.80 FT TO POB, SUBJ
TO EASE OF REC; AND,
THE E 615.00 FT (AS MEAS ALG THE N LINE THEREOF) OF THE NEIA OF THE SEI/4 LYG
NLY OF THE NLY R/W LINE OF S COON CREEK DR EX RDS SUBJ TO EASE OF REC.
2. The finding for the rezoning is to ensure consistency between the City of Andover
Comprehensive Plan and Andover City Codes.
3. All other sections of the Zoning Ordinance shall remain as written and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Andover.
4. The Zoning Ordinance will become valid once it is published in the City designated newspaper
and the correlating Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved by the Metropolitan Council.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 6th day of June, 2017.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Michelle Harmer, City Clerk
Julie Trude, Mayor
p
J
a
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting F a
Minutes – May 24, 2017 �'�
^ c:
Page 10
Chairperson Daninger stated he is comfortable with this CUP request as the commercial
site plan will address any other issues. He added he is supportive of encouraging new
businesses in Andover.
Commissioner Nemeth requested clarification regarding opaque fencing. Mr. Janish
stated it is a chain link fence with solid material slats running through it.
Commissioner Nemeth stated there are commercial fences along Hanson and Round Lake
Boulevards that require maintenance. He added he would prefer the use of some type of
fencing material that is easy to maintain as it gets older.
Mr. Janish stated the permit can be brought forward for review and revocation if the
applicant is in violation of the requirements of the CUP.
Commissioner Peterson stated he is comfortable with opaque fence as described, if it is
not along the property line at 1615 Avenue.
Motion by Janish, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of Res. No.
approving a Conditional Use Permit for Eric Hicks, 3017 16151 Avenue NW, for exterior
storage space related to his business, Upper Midwest Athletic Construction. Motion
carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3 -absent vote (Cleven, Hudson, Koehler).
City Planner Hanson stated that this item would be reviewed by the City Council at their
June 6, 2017 Regular Meeting.
- PUBLIC HEARING: Rezoning of Rural Reserve Residential District.
' City Planner Hanson reviewed plans to rezone lands designated as Rural Reserve from R-
1 – Single Family Rural to RR -Rural Reserve Residential. This proposed rezoning of the
RR -Rural Reserve coincides with the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and
Zoning Text Amendment that the Commission and City Council had previously
reviewed.
Ms. Hanson stated the rezoning process includes the official adoption of the zoning map.
She added the area in question was identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan, adopted
in 2008, for future urban development if municipal services were available.
Ms. Hanson stated the current Comprehensive Plan has a minimum lot split of 1 home
per 20 acres. She added, in March 2017, a request for a Comprehensive Plan amendment
was received by an applicant who wished to further subdivide residential property to 1
home per 10 acres. She noted this request was approved by the City Council and is
currently being reviewed by the Metropolitan Council, which has indicated that the
request will be approved.
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting AFS'
Minutes —May 24, 2017
Page 11
Ms. Hanson stated the area in question is currently zoned Rural Residential but creating a
new zoning district of Rural Reserve Residential is required to provide provisions that
will allow for further subdivision of land.
Ms. Hanson stated public hearing notices were sent and 10 calls were received from
residents, expressing concern about how the zoning change will affect future urban
development in this area. She reiterated that the zoning change allows landowners to
split their property but will have no effect on urban development.
Ms. Hanson stated City Staff recommends approval of rezoning this property as it will
institute provisions for regulation of land subdivision. She added City Staff recommends
adoption of the zoning district map as well.
Commissioner Nemeth asked whether Single Family Rural Reserve needs to be defined.
Ms. Hanson stated that was reviewed by the Commission on May 9, 2017, and will be
added to City Code, and defined as part of the Comprehensive Plan update.
Motion by Peterson, seconded by Sims, to open the public hearing at 8:26 p.m. Motion
carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3 -absent vote (Cleven, Hudson, Koehler).
Chairperson Daninger clarified that there will be no urban development in this area. He
added this agenda item is simply a zoning change.
Michael Ahles, 2439 154th Avenue NW, stated he and his neighbors are curious about
the plans for this area. He added streets come to an end there, so there is obviously a plan
for development at some point.
Chairperson Daninger stated the Commission cannot comment on how or when that
property will be developed.
Ms. Hanson stated the Rural Reserve Area, as identified in the Comprehensive Plan, is an
area within the City of Andover that would be designated for urban development at a
point when all other urban development is completed. She added this would only be
considered if municipal services were in place.
Ms. Hanson stated the City is currently beginning the Comprehensive Plan review
process, which must be updated and submitted by the end of 2018. She added there are
no municipal services in this area, so no urban development is planned.
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting,
Minutes — May 24, 2017
Page 12
Mr. Ahles stated the topography of the area would be difficult to develop, as the water
table is high and fluctuates regularly. Ms. Hanson agreed, adding the City is working
with Coon Creek Watershed District to look at options for that property.
Chairperson Daninger pointed out that the term "Rural Reserve" is misleading as the
property is designated for future urban development.
Jean Watson, 13141 Lily Street NW, Coon Rapids, stated her family has owned property
on Uplander Street since the 1960's, and they have been unable to develop the property
because of the lack of sewer and water, which have to come through that area. She added
they have been waiting to hear whether that will happen.
Ms. Hanson stated the sewer study plan will be updated as part of the 2018
Comprehensive Plan process.
Ms. Watson asked whether sewer and water can run through somewhere else. Ms.
Hanson stated there are no plans for sewer and water at this time.
Ms. Watson stated she thought the water and sewer could come through on Bunker Lake
Boulevard.
Chairperson Daninger stated water and sewer -related questions can be directed to City
Staff.
Ms. Watson expressed her concern regarding the rezoning of the property.
Scott Hager, 3045 - 153`d Avenue NW, asked how "future urban development" will
ensure an acceptable transition from large lots to the west, to smaller lots to the east.
Ms. Hanson stated any development would not occur until municipal services are
available on the property. She reiterated that a sewer study is being completed as part of
the Comprehensive Plan process.
Chairperson Daninger stated the City is unsure whether the land can ever be developed,
and whether water and sewer can be put in. He added there is a lot of peat moss in the
area.
Kevin Romano, 2990 - 153`d Avenue NW, stated properties to the west of the area are on
2.5 acre lots with dead-end cul-de-sacs, and on the east side, the roads end at the area's
border.
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Wil^ _
h 't
Minutes—May 24, 2017f3, ,y +
Page 13
Ms. Hanson stated this zoning change will allow property owners to split lots to 1 house
per 10 acres. She added urban development in the area is not planned at this time.
Mathew Vorhees, 3122 — 153rd Avenue NW, asked what the next steps would be if this
rezoning is not approved by Metropolitan Council, to meet expectations for development.
Ms. Hanson stated the rezoning request, if approved, will bring the Comprehensive Plan
and City's Code in alignment with the Metropolitan Council's policies.
Mr. Vorhees asked what will happen if the rezoning request is denied. Ms. Hanson stated
the current zoning would remain the same. Mr. Vorhees asked why the City is doing this.
Ms. Hanson stated the rezoning would give property owners the right to subdivide their
property to one home per 10 acres vs. 1 home per 20 acres.
Lee Packer, 3074 - 1615` Avenue NW, stated his property is located on the corner of 16151
Avenue and Round Lake Boulevard. He added he submitted a request to the City to build
2 houses on 5 acres, but he was informed that the area's zoning only allows 1 house per
20 acres. He added nothing else is changing except the ability for homeowners to
subdivide their property.
Chairperson Daninger requested that members of the public should address the Planning
Commission during the public hearing. He noted that Mr. Packer was addressing the
audience.
Ken Siebert, 2987 - 153`d Avenue NW, asked for clarification regarding the red box,
which was included in the letter that was sent to residents. Hanson stated all the
properties highlighted on the map are within the public hearing notification area. He
added the letter included legal descriptions of the properties. Ms. Hanson stated the legal
descriptions are the properties that are affected by the zoning change.
Mr. Siebert asked whether City Staff is sure that the Metropolitan Council will pass the
rezoning request. Ms. Hanson stated the Metropolitan Council has indicated that they are
recommending approval to their Board of Directors due to the request being consistent
with Metropolitan Council Policy.
Motion by Peterson, seconded by Nemeth, to close the public hearing at 8:46 p.m.
Motion carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3 -absent votes.
Commissioner Sims asked whether City Council approval of the rezoning would have to
be reversed if the Metropolitan Council does not approve it for some reason. Ms. Hanson
stated a resolution condition is contingent on the approval of the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment by Met Council; however the amendment is consistent with Metropolitan
Council's policy that states 1 house per 10 acres in the rural reserve areas.
Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes — May 24, 2017 DRAFT
Page 14
Motion by Nemeth, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of Res. No.
approving the rezoning of lands designated as Rural Reserve from R-1 — Single Family
Rural to RR -Rural Reserve Residential subject to the conditions of the ordinance
amendment, because the rezoning of the property will provide provisions to regulate the
subdivision of lands within the Rural Reserve district and ensure compliance with City
Codes and the Andover Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3 -
absent vote (Cleven, Hudson, Koehler).
Ms. Hanson stated this application will be reviewed by the City Council at their June 6,
2017, Regular Meeting.
Ms. Hanson urged residents in the area to continue to watch for City meeting agendas.
She added the Comprehensive Plan update process will include open meetings, some of
which will include discussions about the future of the rural reserve area.
OTHER BUSINESS.
City Planner Hanson stated she did not have any further updates.
Commissioner Nemeth asked for an update on three recent planning cases, including a
Conditional Use Permit amendment and preliminary plat request, both approved by the
City Council, and a variance request.
Mr. Janish stated an extension on the variance request was granted as the applicant will
not be able to attend the City Council's June 6, 2017, regular meeting. He added this
issue will be reviewed at the City Council's July 18, 2017, Regular Meeting.
Ms. Hanson confirmed that the variance request submitted by Lee Warneka will be
reviewed at the City Council's July 18, 2017, Regular Meeting.
Commissioner Nemeth asked whether the Planning Commissioners can get involved in
Family Fun Fest, as in previous years. Ms. Hanson confirmed this, and said she will get
information to the Commissioners about volunteer opportunities as soon it becomes
available.
ADJOURNMENT.
Motion by Sims, seconded by Nemeth, to adjourn the meeting at 8:52 p.m. Motion
carried on a 4 -ayes, 0 -nays, 3 -absent vote (Cleven, Hudson, Koehler).
Respectfully Submitted,
N4
Em
I
"FAW
1-1
a
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and City Councilmembers
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: Joe Janish, Community Development Dire
Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner
SUBJECT: Consider Ordinance Summary Publication
DATE: June 6, 2017
INTRODUCTION
Cities often use a "summary publication" in order to reduce the amount of material that
would normally be printed in the official newspaper, and reduce the publication costs.
DISCUSSION
The attached proposed summary publication includes a summary of: City Code
Amendments to Title 12 Zoning Regulations and Title 13 Planning and Development
and the Rezone R1 — Single Family Rural to RR — Rural Reserve Residential.
Authorization would allow for staff to forward the attached ordinance vs. the two
attached ordinances. Publication costs are expected to be reduced considerably and
staff will have the full versions available for public inspection.
ACTION REQUIRED
Staff recommends the City Council consider authorizing summary publication for the
previous two agenda items: City Code Amendments to Title 12 Zoning Regulations and
Title 13 Planning and Development and the Rezone of R1 — Single Family Rural to RR
Residential.
ly
Community Development Director
Attachments:
Ordinance Summary for Publication
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. XX SUMMARY
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE TITLE 12 ZONING REGULATIONS: 12-3 ZONING
DISTRICTS AND MAPS, SECTION 12-12 PERMITTED, PERMITTED ASSCESSORY,
CONDITIONAL, INTERIM AND PROHIBITED USES CITY CODE; TITLE 13 PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT: 13-1 SPLITTING LOTS, PARCELS OR TRACTS OF LAND
STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION AND POLICY
Statutory Authorization
This ordinance amendment is adopted pursuant to the authorization and policies contained in Minnesota
Statute 412.
Policy
The purpose of these regulations is to protect the public health, safety and welfare. The proposed amendment
to City Code Title 12 establishes the RR — Rural Reserve Residential District and uses allowed within the
district; Title 13 establishes lot split provisions within the RR — Rural Reserve Residential District in the City
of Andover.
GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS
Jurisdiction
The provisions of this ordinance shall apply to the City of Andover.
Enforcement
The City Administrator or his/her designee shall have the authority to enforce the provisions of this
ordinance.
Interpretation
Interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance shall be held to be the minimum requirements and shall be
liberally construed in the favor of the governing body.
A printed copy of this ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular hours of the City
Clerk.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 6th day of June, 2017.
ATTEST: CITY OF ANDOVER
Michelle Harmer, Deputy City Clerk
Julie Trude, Mayor
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Councilmembers
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
Administrator's Report
June 6, 2017
The City Administrator and Department Heads present will provide a brief verbal update on
various items of interest to the City Council and to the residents at the meeting. Listed below are
a few areas of interest:
1. Administration & City Department Activities
2. Update on Development/CIP Projects
3. Legislative Updates
4. Meeting reminders
Upon receipt of the meeting packet, if a member of the Council would like an update on a
particular item, please notify me so an adequate update can be made.
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor & Council Members
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Supplemental Agenda Items for June 6, 2017 City Council Meeting
DATE: June 6, 2017
The City Council is requested to receive the following supplemental information.
Discussion Items
Add -On Item #12a. Massage Establishment License/15824 Olive St. NW (Supplemental) —
Administration
submitted,
City
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOv
TO: Mayor and City Cou
CC: Jim Dickinson, City
FROM: Michelle Hartner, Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: Approve Massage Establishment License/15824 Olive Street NW
DATE: June 6, 2017
INTRODUCTION
Lisa Scholl, 15824 Olive Street NW has applied for a Therapeutic Massage
Establishment License.
DISCUSSION
Ms. Scholl has applied for a Therapeutic Massage Establishment license, paid the
appropriate fee and been approved by the Sheriff's Office.
Approval of this license is contingent on the approval of the Conditional Use Permit Ms.
Scholl has applied for.
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to approve the license for the period of June 7, 2017
through December 31, 2017.
Respectfully submitted,
Michelle Harmer
Deputy City Clerk
Attach: License application
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV `
THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE APPLICATION
1. Name of Applicant 41 DlN Ih'1 GLV I (%
First Middle
2. Applicant's Date of Birth (must be 18 yrs old) _
3. Telephone Number of Applicant.
_ ,
4. Email Address of Applicant
S. Home Address of Applicant
a l , .. I
6. Address of Business/Premises to be Licensed
7. Name of Business/Premises dab V./15
8. Telephone Number for Business/Premises
9. Legal Description of Business/Premises to be Licensed ��✓a ��oC Z
G� GU/nnciS
10. Name of Owner of Premisestoto be Licensed / �1/ �/l�r
eilelC�/f/n%1
IA/N hnol A0/7 /,'�/. ,moi f7 AA/1 ,2
11. Address of Owner of Premises to be Licensed
Alk ANA k4AI :!�i5
12. Within the preceding five years has the applicant or spouse been convicted of any
felony, crime or violation of any ordinance other than traffic. If so, provide the
state or county of conviction, the date of conviction and the specific crime so
committed. (J o
13. If the applicant is a corporation list the names, addresses and dates of birth of all
persons having a beneficial interest therein (i.e. officers, directors, stockholders).
14. Description of services to be
The information requested hi items 1,2,3 and 9 must be provided for all owners,
lessees, operators and massage therapists of the proposed therapeutic massage
establishment,
Thsuranco: Each applicant for a license shall file with the city a public liability
insurance policy or certificate of insurance from a company authorized to do business
in the state of Minnesota, insuring the applicant against any and all loss arising out of
the use, operation or maintenance of the therapeutic massage establishment. The
policy of insurance shall be in limits of not less than five hundred thousand dollars
($500,000.00). Failure to keep in full force and effect the insurance required herein is
grounds for revocation.
Prior to consideration of the application by City Council, an investigation shall be
made by the code enforcement officer and the building official to determine
compliance with this chapter of all premises proposed to be licensed, and by the
County Sheriff's Department of all persons listed on the license application, Please
atta6y,a copyof ou ikeriv&i.
Applicant and associates in this application will strictly comply with all ordinances of
the City. I hereby certify that I have read the foregoing questions and that the answers
are true of my own knowledge.
Licenses expire on December 31" of each year. Lack of payment of annual licensing
fee shall be cause for revocation of license.
6ignatwe—Appdoaut Date
We, the neighbors of the Wild Iris neighborhood, petition the City of Andover to re -install stop
signs at the intersections of 138t" Lane NW and Underclift Street NW (a four-way stop), and
140"' Avenue NW and Underclift Street NW (a three-way stop) that were removed at the end of
2016.
There are bus stops at each of these intersections, and there has been a major increase in the
number of people who drive over the speed limit on Underclift Street NW, because there are no
stop signs on this stretch of Underclift Street NW. Because of the lack of stop signs, there have
been accidents at the two intersections of 138th Lane NW and 140t)' Avenue NW and Underclift
Street NW that have not experienced accidents before, one of them including a fatality.
I demand that the City of Andover re -install stop signs on Underclift Street NW at the
Intersections of 138'" Lane NW and 140"Avenue NW.
3�st Wo,
,r tH�(A
Name
Address
Phone #
Signature
Mary Froberg
3788 139"' Lane NW
612-720-2305
Ray Froberg
3788 139t" Lane NW
612-710-4475
,
'S
3 IFIi-V I.NVJ
7 /39
- --/ a
rq
37S3 09'kZgn
//
70 LFv7 Y2
rnq cs
u ' 3"165 l 3q L-,7 /,,(
2 &32V, Sb
1 IM
37 S3 /1 h Ar -b
3 DT wq
L455 7�oRiJ
,t
3l� 13�i� �
73 323 bl.1S
(,
n
rd
7W -4v -79-C
P
a�;dJ'
3��8 I 14
1z,z5" �
--
to/o�z
- p '
773 -ill
f�(4°pr b
3 65N /39'a C m .�/r-,/
763-7)a yam/
3(o`ib-1511*67 t
3 -If I
oh
3 `ID t3ffliLkA)
63-`[46-38
Kr in }CfSc�n
to I -Nim
U-ZIQl151'l
Lids U Ra��t
aW 1Zo1�y
s l�°I li S NvU
4US-500-5111 I
We, the neighbors of the Wild Iris neighborhood, petition the City of Andover to re -install stop
signs at the intersections of 138' Lane NW and Underclift Street NW (a four-way stop), and
140th Avenue NW and Underclift Street NW (a three-way stop) that were removed at the end of
2016.
There are bus stops at each of these intersections, and there has been a maior increase in the
number of people who drive over the speed limit on Underclift Street NW, because there are no
stop signs on this stretch of Underclift Street NW. Because of the lack of stop signs, there have
been accidents at the two intersections of 138"' Lane NW and 140"' Avenue NW and Underclift
Street NW that have not experienced accidents before, one of them including a fatality.
I demand that the City of Andover re -install stop signs on Underclift Street NW at the
Intersections of 138"' Lane NW and 140" Avenue NW.
N"
i ll' /Li1'.17
� r �
�il I Iia1r
-
. 1u►
I
i
VON �y
OWI �r /
(f/
•������
•
1
i L
1 �7i
[PJN�M�Qjt MR
N"
We, the neighbors of the Wild Iris neighborhood, petition the City of Andover to re -install stop
signs at the intersections of 138"' Lane NW and Underclift Street NW (a four-way stop), and
1401 Avenue NW and Underclift Street NW (a three-way stop) that were removed at the end of
2016.
There are bus stops at each of these intersections, and there has been a major increase in the
number of people who drive over the speed limit on Underclift Street NW, because there are no
stop signs on this stretch of Underclift Street NW. Because of the lack of stop signs, there have
been accidents at the two intersections of 1381h Lane NW and 140"' Avenue NW and Underclift
Street NW that have not experienced accidents before, one of them including a fatality.
I demand that the City of Andover re -install stop signs on Underclift Street NW at the
Intersections of 1381 Lane NW and 140"' Avenue NW.
Signature
Oran
11L._e"1r�•.�/
We, the neighbors of the Wild Iris neighborhood, petition the City of Andover to re -install stop
signs at the intersections of 138"' Lane NW and Underclift Street NW (a four-way stop), and
140'" Avenue NW and Underclift Street NW (a three-way stop) that were removed at the end of
2016.
There are bus stops at each of these intersections, and there has been a major increase in the
number of people who drive over the speed limit on Underclift Street NW, because there are no
stop signs on this stretch of Underclift Street NW. Because of the lack of stop signs, there have
been accidents at the two intersections of 138"' Lane NW and 140"' Avenue NW and Underclift
Street NW that have not experienced accidents before, one of them including a fatality.
I demand that the City of Andover re -install stop signs on Underclift Street NW at the
Intersections of 13811' Lane NW and 140"' Avenue NW.
J
Vol
I J. -
n
-
, ::;
M� Mqm
Ml ,rAM
%���
��l�l
--="
L�ll�
i
IBM
��
/ - ,III.
�
; ��►�.�'�►��t�
J
Vol
We, the neighbors of the Wild Iris neighborhood, petition the City of Andover to re -install stop
signs at the intersections of 1381' Lane NW and Underclift Street NW (a four-way stop), and
140'" Avenue NW and Underclift Street NW (a three-way stop) that were removed at the end of
2016.
There are bus stops at each of these intersections, and there has been a major increase in the
number of people who drive over the speed limit on Underclift Street NW, because there are no
stop signs on this stretch of Underclift Street NW. Because of the lack of stop signs, there have
been accidents at the two intersections of 138th Lane NW and 140"' Avenue NW and Underclift
Street NW that have not experienced accidents before, one of them including a fatality.
I demand that the City of Andover re -install stop signs on Underclift Street NW at the
Intersections of 1381 Lane NW and 1401 Avenue NW.
Name
Address
Phone #
Signature
37s9 J YOT h
R V e- M0 RAhV°
7('3- q
g3So?
(i5 i
Va 1qVhktNW
U 1Z.n2-- 1
li
�m S+en e
3-nv 44'" Aw- W
4a-3ara b
-T�;;.
Uc�d AR -k5
3?9 5 /Z/0+4 Ab? -d
(oit'599. 0713
Jodi
3�-07 IV6r BGG
66? G�-
a Ton
3 67 1(16 c
mac?- 1i3Qa�
GA
.
3831I &--'Ax IJw A
7& Y� ?
j-
3�3 1 �°
-0
(29
I. Lbw
13Y8JYijrc
7031!33240
L
L L
11973 iv«q s�,v�
dJ vz1 o��r
3� 3 w
-
j�U� YeZ
3�'y9 /3y�=Lh/vim
7/- -'IV,?
ive
NO
MA
We, the neighbors of the Wild Iris neighborhood, petition the City of Andover to re -install stop
signs at the intersections of 138t' Lane NW and Underclift Street NW (a four-way stop), and
140"' Avenue NW and Underclift Street NW (a three-way stop) that were removed at the end of
2016.
There are bus stops at each of these intersections, and there has been a major increase in the
number of people who drive over the speed limit on Undercliff Street NW, because there are nc
stop signs on this stretch of Underclift Street NW. Because of the lack of stop signs, there have
been accidents at the two intersections of 138'" Lane NW and 140'" Avenue NW and Underclift
Street NW that have not experienced accidents before, one of them including a fatality.
I demand that the City of Andover re -install stop signs on Underclift Street NW at the
Intersections of 138"' Lane NW and 1401 Avenue NW.
J
rM
4�
�
RW SWURK I WMAI
1, SM IN
HIS "Rim
011 IN
M I
ME LTJ
� 4 /
. ...
%./ L.���I
JfJff
"d ARM
/ _
•
MEMO
_ �%/JAI
�r1��.�/J%l
QAM
.'a7i son r�
=6Mor
i
J
rM
We, the neighbors of the Wild Iris neighborhood, petition the City of Andover to re -install stop
signs at the intersections of 138t" Lane NW and Undercliff Street NW (a four-way stop), and
1401 Avenue NW and Underclift Street NW (a three-way stop) that were removed at the end of
2016.
There are bus stops at each of these intersections, and there has been a major increase in the
number of people who drive over the speed limit on Underclift Street NW, because there are no
stop signs on this stretch of Underclift Street NW. Because of the lack of stop signs, there have
been accidents at the two intersections of 138'" Lane NW and 140"' Avenue NW and Underclift
Street NW that have not experienced accidents before, one of them including a fatality.
I demand that the City of Andover re -install stop signs on Underclift Street NW at the
Intersections of 138"' Lane NW and 140th Avenue NW.
�-
Signature
II�QS
ON
, 1
AM,I :v.`UM
Y. rind_ �
� V �_.Y :� �MANPOWER
�' —.
_/�/ `rte
V
\l
�/ It/ \
/" . i •�Y
.'I . Imo. a��/R
MIM40
M1 AM M
J
User ID: ksaba, Date Time: 5/9/2017 7:53 AM, Document Name: Microsoft Word - Document5
STOP SIGN PETITION
We, the undersigned residents of the block of
hereby petition the City of Andover to re -install STOP SIGNS at the intersection of
1' V Y1 & u _dCLLL L t AND
the speed of traffic to protect our children.
NAME
Address Email
W
bound traffic. We want to slow
Agree Disagree
ill 3�a5 I u W ✓
Qr�r�O W � IIS
3-1-13 13en LAAAA) 3
3 890 Wa v-5 ✓
ove
41er-
��Cvc
13ksG w��1�INesF !C
Ij 136-ALNN�j
0
User A; ksaba, Date/Time: 5/9/2017 7:53 AM, Document Name: Microsoft Word - Document5
NAME (Signature) Address Email
3731 138 L, Na
Agree/
J
. ( v-, LA XA, Y vuti✓lam
1 -1 v J -,ynU UAy 1 rr — ,, d ,
Iyo5c1 ur,aucA�* .1 N -)�—
1uaU%
l HOZ% �IN06gd.Lirf 5°
&/03 O UncfP�RI A
Disagree
Qz1(P-�'