HomeMy WebLinkAboutWK - February 28, 2017ANL6
Y6 W
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. -AN DOVER, MINN ESO[ A 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
City Council Workshop
Tuesday, February 28, 2017
Conference Rooms A & B
1. Call to Order — 6:00 p.m.
2. Comprehensive Plan Update Discussions —Planning
3. Community Survey Discussions —Administration
4. Discuss City Tree Pruning and Removal Process — Engineering
5. City Communications Discussion -Administration
6. December 2016 Budget Progress Report -Administration
7. January 2017 City Investments Review -Administration
8. Other Business
9. Adjournment
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Councilmembers
James Dickinson, City Administrat(Nk
Joe Janish, Community Development
Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner
Discuss Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) — Rural Reserve -planning
February 28, 2017
BACKGROUND
0
At the October 25, 2016 City Council work session, City Council discussed a CPA request by
Jake and Jon Packer to allow the subdivision of land within the Rural Reserve District into
parcels smaller than what is currently allowed in the Comprehensive Plan. City Council
provided direction to staff to proceed with a CPA and ordinance to address future development
within the rural reserve area.
DISCUSSION
Comprehensive Plan
According to the Andover Comprehensive Plan, the Rural Reserve District was designated as an
area to accommodate future urban growth beyond the planned Municipal Urban Service Area
(MUSA). Lot splits of less than one parcel per 20 acres and subdivisions of less than 1 parcel
per 40 acres is prohibited to prevent this area from rural residential development that would
preclude orderly MUSA expansion. The city has reached an agreement with the Metropolitan
Council (Met Council) that areas designated for residential development in the Rural Reserve
will be developed at 3 units per net acre once MUSA is available.
Flexible Development
The Met Council supports densities of 1 unit per 10 acres in the rural reserve area. Density
beyond this is supported by Met Council; however, it requires provisions such as an ordinance to
allow for future wastewater service at a minimum density of 3 units per acre.
Staff is proposing to retain a density of 1 unit per 10 acres; however with the adoption of an
ordinance, the minimum lot size may be reduced as long as the provisions in the ordinance are
addressed at the time of the lot split or subdivision. Planning tools that would need to be
considered in the ordinance include requirements of build -out plans (ghost platting), the location
of building pads that allow for future subdivision of the land into urban lots, and the use of deed
restrictions, easements, and/or covenants to protect the remaining land for future development.
The intent of the ordinance is to allow subdivision of land while preserving the land for future
urban development.
Minimum Lot Size
5 acres with compliance of ordinance
provisions
Density
1 unit per 10 acres
City Utilities
None
Corresponding Zoning Districts
RRR Rural Reserve Residential
Type of Development
Single Family Detached Housing
Met Council
City staff and the Met Council have been collaborating throughout the process to ensure
compliancy with the Council polices. Currently, Met Council staff is reviewing the proposed
CPA and should have comments to staff prior to the work session. It is common to submit the
CPA to Met Council prior to the completion of the ordinance. However, once Met Council
approves the CPA, it will not go into effect until the City Council adopts the ordinance that
coincides with the CPA. Met Council does not need to review or approve the ordinance;
however City Staff must provide them with a copy once it is approved by City Council.
According to the Metropolitan Council, there are 28 communities in the metropolitan area that
are designated for future wastewater service, including Andover; 22 of which have some type of
ordinances in place that allows higher density development while preserving open space for
future expansion of municipal services. The variations in these ordinances differ among
communities to reflect their original intent for adopting the ordinance. Some communities wish
to preserve expanses of undeveloped land, while others have landscapes that are restricted by
limiting features, and still others have planned to accommodate future growth. The Andover
CPA proposal is similar to what the other communities have adopted.
Next Step
If City Council gives staff direction to move forward with the CPA, here is the tentative
schedule:
March 7, 2017 — CPA Public Hearing at Planning and Zoning Commission
March 14, 2017 — City Council acts on the CPA
March 17, 2017 — Submittal of the CPA to Met Council
April 11, 2017 - Ordinance Public Hearing
April 18 or May 2 — City Council acts on proposed ordinance
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to discuss the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and
provide staff with direction.
Respectfully ubmitted,
Stephanie . Hanson
City Planner
Attachments
Land use Map
Proposed CPA
October 25, 2016 City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes
l lTl OI'
�b� 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
City of Andover Land Use Districts
Land use districts are established to ensure compatible development and to protect
natural resources and amenities. The district definitions provided below are intended to
state their purpose, provide location criteria and describe the relationship of each district
with other land uses.
RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DISTRICTS
Rural Reserve Residential (RRR) District was designated as an area of approximately
one thousand acres in size to accommodate future urban growth beyond the
previously planned Municipal Urban Service Area. This area is restricted from urban
development until a master plan has been approved and municipal sewer and water
can be constructed to serve the area. The city prohibits lot splits and subdivisions of
less than one parcel per twreniy ten acres to prevent this area from rural residential
development that would preclude orderly MUSA expansion. There are opportunities to
allow for rural residential lot splits and development but requires the majority of the
land be preserved for future urban development. A new zoning district that reflects the
recommended base and density options, lot sizes and typical uses is needed to
implement this plan category.
In the future, a new trunk sewer line will connect to the Coon Rapids Interceptor, a
regional trunk sewer line located near the intersection of Crooked and Bunker Lake
Boulevards. The city has reached agreement with the Metropolitan Council that areas
designated for residential development in the Rural Reserve will be developed at three
units per net acre once MUSA becomes available (subtracting parks, wetlands,
floodplain, water bodies, arterial roads, and other areas restricted from development).
Minimum Lot Size
5 acres with compliance of ordinance
provisions
Density
1 unit per 10 acres
City Utilities
None
Corresponding Zoning Districts
RRR Rural Reserve Residential
Type of Development
Single Family Detached Housing
Rural Residential (RR) district provides an area for low intensity residential
development in areas outside of the Municipal Urban Service Area (MUSA) that will not
be served by municipal sewer and water. The minimum lot size is 2.5 acres to provide
sufficient space for on site sewer and water facilities and to prevent dense development
that would create an adverse impact on municipal and regional infrastructure. However,
smaller acreage lots exist in areas subdivided prior to 1978 and in the two previously
approved rural planned unit developments: Nightingale Preserve and Timber River
19
Estates. This district must be protected from higher intensity land uses, including the
Urban Residential Low Density Land Use District, with appropriate transitions. This
district also accommodates agricultural land uses.
Minimum Lot Size
2.50 acres
Density
0.4 units per acre
City Utilities
None
Corresponding Zoning Districts
R-1 - Single Family Rural Residential
R-2 - Single Family Estate
R-3 - Single Family Suburban
Type of Development
Single Family Detached Housing, Agriculture
Urban Residential Low Density (URL) district is established to create cohesive
neighborhoods of single-family detached housing within the MUSA and with access to
municipal sewer and water. Residential lots within this district are sized to allow
efficient utilization of municipal infrastructure as well as to provide an area large enough
to accommodate housing market demands. These neighborhoods must be protected
from higher intensity uses with appropriate transitions. These transitions include natural
features such as trees, wetlands, streams or major changes in topography. Man-made
elements such as streets, parks or earth berms in combination with landscaping are
also appropriate. When adjacent to arterial roadways, additional setback distance,
landscaping and berming are required. Facilities that generate noise, traffic, and/or
glare also require major separation from these neighborhoods.
Minimum Lot Size
711,400 square feet
Density
1.5 to 3.6 units per acre
Maximum PUD Density
4 units per acre
City Utilities
Required
Corresponding Zoning Districts
R-4 Single Family Urban Residential
Type of Development
Single Family Detached Housing
CIT1' OF
NDOVE 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
Urban Residential -Medium Density (URM) district provides areas suitable for a variety
of attached and detached dwelling units. The URM district helps to address the need for
life cycle housing with increased density and smaller lot sizes. This district, with
appropriate transitions, can serve as a buffer between lower density residential and
commercial districts and may also be appropriate along higher volume transportation
corridors, such as collector and arterial streets. These neighborhoods are created as
part of a planned unit development that ensures efficient distribution of density and to
achieve appropriate transitions between uses of different intensity and transportation
corridors. These transitions are achieved with a combination of landscaping, berming,
physical separation and preservation of natural features.
Minimum Lot Size
Variable
Density
1.5 to 5 units per acre
Maximum PUD Density
6 units per acre
City Utilities
Required
Corresponding Zoning
Districts
R-4 Single Family Urban Residential
M-1 Multi le Dwellina Medium Density
Type of Development
Single Family Detached, Two Family Residences
Town homes and Condominiums with private
Urban Residential - High Density (URH) district provides additional affordable housing
choices for all stages of the life cycle. Owner occupied as well as rental housing is
permitted. Planned unit development review is used to establish standards that are
specifically designed for each development. Potential sites for this district must be
evaluated to ensure sufficient capacity of municipal infrastructure can be provided.
Location near higher volume transportation corridors, such as collector and arterial
streets is necessary to accommodate the increased level of traffic generated by this
land use. Location near shopping, service, transit and park facilities is also desirable.
Appropriate transitions between this district and other districts or transportation corridors
are necessary. These transitions are achieved with a combination of landscaping,
berming, physical separation and preservation of natural features.
Minimum Lot Size
Variable
Density
6 to 12 units per acre
Maximum PUD Density
Up to 14.4 units per acre
City Utilities
Required
Corresponding Zoning Districts
M- 2 Multiple Dwelling High Density
Type of Development
Single Family Dwelling
Two Family Dwelling
Location Criteria
Must abut collector or arterial street
Best located near shopping, service, transit and
parks
20
` bYL
2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
COMMERCIAL LAND USE DISTRICTS
Limited Commercial (LC) land use district is designated for locations in the
community that should be limited to primarily office uses due to their location in
proximity to residential neighborhoods. This district can be used to transition
from residential neighborhoods to more intense commercial uses or
transportation corridors. Site design and building architecture are required to
complement adjacent residential neighborhoods when so located. A
combination of landscaping, berming, physical separation and preservation of
natural features is necessary to provide an appropriate transition to residential
neighborhoods.
Area Requirements
1-5 acres
City Utilities
Required within MUSA
Corresponding Zoning Districts
LB - Limited Business
Type of Development
Professional office and similar uses; not including
retail sales
Location Criteria
Adjacent to collector or arterial street or within a
larger commercial develo ment
Development Criteria
Design to complement surrounding land uses.
S ecial care for transitions to residential.
Neighborhood Commercial (NC) land use district is designated for businesses that
provide services and retail goods to meet local neighborhood needs. The trade area
and size of these businesses are smaller than those found in General Commercial
areas. Site design and architecture is carefully reviewed to create a cohesive center
that complements adjacent land uses. Linear design with storefronts and blank walls is
prohibited. Special care is taken to provide appropriate transitions to residential
neighborhoods with landscaping, berming, physical separation and preservation of
natural features. This district requires location along a collector or arterial street and
convenient pedestrian access. Neighborhood commercial locations are separated from
more intense commercial land uses to avoid pressure to expand intensity beyond a
neighborhood scale.
Area Requirements
1-5 acres
Ci!y Utilities
Required within MUSA
Corresponding Zoning Districts
NB Neighborhood Business
Type of Development
Retail trade and services serving immediate area
Location Criteria
Must abut intersection of collector or arterial streets
Development Criteria
Design to complement surrounding land uses.
Limit to development nodes. Strip development
prohibited. Special care for transitions to
residential. Convenient pedestrian access.
21
cirMv
N6 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
General Commercial (GC) is intended to be the focal point of commercial activity in the
city on a larger scale than the Neighborhood Commercial District and may serve a trade
area that extends beyond the City limits. This district provides a complementary mix of
uses, including retail, service, office, entertainment and civic facilities. Site design must
provide convenient access for both pedestrian and vehicular traffic. The architecture of
structures must complement an overall architectural theme for that district. General
Commercial districts that are located adjacent to residential properties must provide
extensive berming, landscaping and physical separation to ensure an appropriate
transition is created.
Area Requirements
5 acres or more
City Utilities
Required
Corresponding Zoning Districts
SC Shopping Center
Type of Development
GB General Business
Type of Development
Variety of commercial uses with large market area
Location Criteria
Must abut intersection of collector or arterial streets
Must be located within the MUSA
Design to complement surrounding land uses.
Development Criteria
Limit to development nodes. Strip development
prohibited. Special care for transitions to
residential. Convenient pedestrian access.
INDUSTRIAL LAND USE DISTRICT
Light Industrial (LI) District is intended to provide a location for a variety of work
processes such as manufacturing, warehousing, wholesaling and distributing. These
uses typically involve intensive use of properties and necessitate separation from
residential zoning districts. Where existing Light Industrial Districts are located adjacent
to residential neighborhoods, extensive berming, landscaping and screening are
necessary to mitigate potential adverse impacts. This district requires convenient
access to collector and arterial streets.
Area Requirements
5 acres or more
City Utilities
Required within MUSA
Corresponding Zoning Districts
I Industrial
Type of Development
Manufacturing, warehousing, wholesaling, Distributing
Location Criteria
Must abut collector or arterial streets
Must be located within the MUSA
Development Criteria
Separation from residential land uses necessary.
Except the Hughs/Westview Industrial Park that presently exists outside the MUSA
23
C T Ab
O {'
NDOW 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
TRANSITIONAL LAND USE DISTRICTS
Transitional land use districts encompass areas where future land use may differ from
that of the designated zoning district. Transitional districts recognize the possibility for
land use to change in the future with the arrival of municipal sewer and water.
Transitional Commercial (TC) District contains properties within the MUSA that are
currently zoned for residential development, but may potentially become commercial
because of their proximity to existing commercial development or location at the
intersection of major transportation corridors. When municipal sewer and water are
available, properties in this district may develop as either residential or commercial
under the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. A Rezoning
requires a contract as specified in the City Code.
Transitional Residential (TR) District contains properties within the MUSA that are
currently zoned for rural residential uses (R-1, R-2, and R-3). These properties are
guided for urban development in 5 year stages as shown in Figure 2.5. Property
designated Transitional Residential may only be platted under urban residential
guidelines and served by municipal utilities. Lot splits may only occur without municipal
services under the requirements of the City Code. Any subdivision of property that
results in lots less than 2.5 acres in size must be served with municipal sewer and
water.
OTHER LAND USE DISTRICTS
Limited Commercial/Medium Density (LC/MD) District contains properties
within the MUSA that have site characteristics conducive to either low intensity
commercial or medium density residential development. This designation is used
to provide a carefully planned transition from a major transportation corridor to
residential neighborhoods. Site design and building architecture are required to
complement adjacent residential neighborhoods. A combination of landscaping,
berming, physical separation and preservation of natural features is necessary to
provide an appropriate transition.
Public (P) District identifies areas for present and future civic, government, school or
other publicly owned and operated facilities.
Open Space (OS) District identifies areas that are protected from development through
public ownership or agreement with private property owners. This designation is used
for public parks and other areas designated for preservation of natural areas, water and
air quality and wildlife habitat.
Agricultural (AG) District identifies areas that are cultivated for raising crops and
farming as well as feeding, breeding, and raising of livestock. These areas are typically
enrolled in the Agricultural Preserve or Green Acres programs as defined by the State
of Minnesota.
24
c,TS O{'
ND OVE 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
�nm��:rear�r�i ����rsrsrsa�rarsnxr srrHaTIOT'IMrersr-�
SEWER STAGING PLAN
Undeveloped land within the Municipal Urban Service Area is divided into five
yeargrowth stages based primarily on the proximity of municipal sewer and
water. Thegrowth stages are intended to provide a reasonable estimate of urban
growth to theyear 2030. Property owners may choose not to develop even if their
property is shownwithin the current growth stage. Property owners seeking to
develop sooner thanshown on the Staging Plan may petition the city to change
the growth stage designation. These changes are at the discretion of the City
Council. The Staging Plan Map is represented on Figure 2.5. Figure 2.6
summarizes the map by providing theamount of acreage within each land use
district in each of the five year stages. The Metropolitan Council also requests
information that summarizes the density of future development in each residential
land use district. This information is provided in Figure2.7.
URBAN
25
SEWER STAGING PLAN
Undeveloped land within the Municipal Urban Service Area is divided into five
yeargrowth stages based primarily on the proximity of municipal sewer and
water. Thegrowth stages are intended to provide a reasonable estimate of urban
growth to theyear 2030. Property owners may choose not to develop even if their
property is shownwithin the current growth stage. Property owners seeking to
develop sooner thanshown on the Staging Plan may petition the city to change
the growth stage designation. These changes are at the discretion of the City
Council. The Staging Plan Map is represented on Figure 2.5. Figure 2.6
summarizes the map by providing theamount of acreage within each land use
district in each of the five year stages. The Metropolitan Council also requests
information that summarizes the density of future development in each residential
land use district. This information is provided in Figure2.7.
URBAN
25
ANDOVER CITY COUNCIL WORE SHOP MEETING — OCTOBER 25, 2016
MINUTES
The Workshop Meeting of the Andover City Council was called to order by Mayor Julie Trude,
October 25, 2016, 6:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW,
Andover, Minnesota.
Councilmembers present: Mike Knight, Sheri Bukkila, Valerie Holthus and James Goodrich
Councilmember absent: None
Also present: City Administrator, Jim Dickinson
City Planner, Stephanie Hanson
Public Works Director/City Engineer, David Berkowitz
Others
( } COMPREHENSIVE PLANAMENDMENT DISCUSSION
�J ,
Ms. Hanson explained the City Council is requested to discuss and provide direction to staff on
the City Council's desire to proceed with a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) and Zoning
Code text amendment to address future development within the rural reserve area.
Ms. Hanson reviewed the staff report with the Council.
Mayor Trude thought the Packer children wanted to build on the grandma's property but it
sounds like they want to subdivide the property within the estate so each child gets a portion of
it. Ms. Hanson indicated that is correct.
Ms. Hanson stated there are two children that want to have houses and everyone in the family is
in agreement that if they can split the property and each get their share then the two children can
build homes on their portion. She stated at this time the Comprehensive Plan does not allow a
split of the land so the City's hands are tied and Met Council does not support that kind of
subdivision in this area.
Ms. Hanson stated she has been working with Met Council on a flexible development policy to
see how it all works. She found out that there are 28 communities in the metro area that are
similar to Andover where they have a rural reserve area and out of the 28 communities, 22 do
allow development in these rural areas. Andover does not at this time. There are a lot examples
of ordinances out there that communities are using. She indicated she has not reviewed all of the
ordinances in depth.
Mayor Trude thought the process would be simpler than it actually is. Councilmember Bukkila
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes —October 25, 2016
Page 2
asked if Ms. Hanson knew which areas the children wanted to split and build on. Ms. Hanson
showed on the map where the proposed building would occur. Councilmember Bukkila
indicated she did not have a problem supporting it.
Councilmember Holthus asked how many acres are the lots to the west of the subject parcel. Ms.
Hanson stated they are five acre properties.
Ms. Hanson stated in the rural reserve at this time property owners cannot split the land into
eight acre parcels as requested by the Packers because that is not provided for in the
Comprehensive Plan. The best that they could do is one unit per ten acres and would be a pretty
quick comprehensive plan amendment. Mayor Trude stated it would be nice if the family could
work something out together.
There was discussion between the Councilmembers on how the Rural Reserve will develop over
time.
Councilmember Bukkila asked if the Rural Reserve as a designation is it locked in as a chunk or
can pieces be pulled out of the Rural Reserve and then it meets a different standard. Mr.
Dickinson explained the reason why the Met Council wants to keep this area as a Rural Reserve
area. He stated the Met Council is trying to be a good steward to the sanitary sewer pipe in the
ground and they want to make the sewer operation efficient throughout all the cities served.
Mr. Berkowitz reviewed with the City Council the Rural Reserve and all the challenges for
development.
Mayor Trude stated she is not against this but thought further review needed to be done.
Consensus of the Council was for staff to challenge the family for alternatives and if that does
not work then to look at flexible zoning for the area in order to meet the family's needs but not to
open up development to everyone at this time.
Councilmember Holthus wondered if the Met Council would be open to rezoning just this area
and not the entire Rural Reserve. Ms. Hanson stated if this area would be developed it would
need to be replaced somewhere else in the community and there really is not any other area
where replacement is available.
DISCUSS WETLAND RESTORATIONPROJECTACCESS/12-23
Mr. Berkowitz explained the City Council is requested to discuss a possible access location and
estimated cost for an access on the south side of the Wetland Restoration project (Old Woodland
Creek Golf Course).
Mr. Berkowitz reviewed the staff report with the Council
• ;�.
,NDOVE
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Councilmembers
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
Community Survey Discussion
February 28, 2017
INTRODUCTION
During the City of Andover 2017 Budget and 2017-2021 CIP development discussions, there
was a desire to pursue a community survey to determine resident support for current city
services, programs and potential capital projects. At the January workshop, the City Council
instructed Administration to proceed forward with a 2017 community survey.
DISCUSSION
The last Community Survey was done in 2014 by The Morris Leatherman Company.
Administration has had discussions with Peter Leatherman from the Morris Leatherman
Company relative to process, timing and potential questions for a City of Andover Community
Survey. In addition City Administration and Mr. Leatherman met with the Parks & Recreation
Commission and the Community Center Advisory Commission on February 16th to seek their
input on the content of a survey.
Attached is the 2014 survey with updates based on Council and Commission input on what types
of questions should be asked on the next survey.
The goal is to have a questionnaire finalized in early March, and the survey conducted in late
March early April.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is requested to review the attached survey, receive a presentation from City
Administration and Mr. Leatherman, and provide direction on the questions the Council would
like to see in the 2017 Survey.
Res e tfully submitted,
Dickinson
Attachment
THE MORRIS LEATHERMAN COMPANY
3128 Dean Court
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414
ANDOVER RESIDENTIAL
SURVEY
FINAL FEBRUARY 2014
Hello, I'm of the Morris Leatherman Company, a polling
firm located in Minneapolis. We've been retained by the City of
Andover to speak with a random sample of residents about issues
€aEd:ng-the city. The survey is being taken because your city
representatives and staff are interested in your opinions and
suggestions. I want to assure you that all individual responses
will be held strictly confidential; only summaries of the entire
sample will be reported. (DO NOT PAUSE)
1. Approximately how many years have
you lived in the City of Andover?
LESS THAN ONE YEAR ...... 24
ONE OR TWO YEARS........"
THREE TO FIVE YEARS .... }�4
SIX TO TEN YEARS....... 344
ELEVEN - TWENTY YRS .... 3&u
OVER TWENTY YEARS ...... }°s
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......$%
2. How would you rate the quality of EXCELLENT..............4-24
life in Andover -- excellent, GOOD...................°u
good, only fair, or poor? ONLY FAIR...............24
POOR.....................1-4
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 8-W
3. What do you like most about living
in Andover?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......"
SMALL TOWN FEEL ........
°G
FRIENDLY PEOPLE ........
4-4v
OPEN SPACES/RURAL ......
4-84
HOUSING/NEIGHBORHOOD ...
3-5-¢
SCHOOLS..................6%
CONVENIENT LOCATION.....3¢
CLOSE TO FAMILY/FRIEND..64
CLOSE TO JOB............3%-
CLOSE TO SHOPPING.......3-°s
QUIET AND PEACEFUL ......2-4
SCATTERED...............24
4. What do you think is the most
serious issue facing the City of
Andover today?
5. How would you rate the sense
community pride among Andover
residents -- excellent, good,
fair, or poor?
of
only
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 4%
NOTHING................484
HIGH TAXES.............34U
TOO MUCH GROWTH ........ 3-1-U
TRAFFIC CONGESTION ......$%
ROAD MAINTENANCE ....... 2-04
LACK OF JOBS ............ 24
RISING CRIME............3%
SCATTERED...............3%
EXCELLENT..............2-5-°U
GOOD...................ba%
ONLY FAIR...............3%
POOR....................3%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3%
Let's talk about community characteristics in Andover. For each
of the following as you visualize your ideal community, please
tell me if you feel the city has enough, too many, or too
little....
6. Ren'�Apartments?
7. Townhomes?
#. Association Maintained Housing?
8. Starter homes for young families?
9. "Move Up" housing?
10. Higher cost housing?
4-1-: ?
12. Assisted living for seniors?
13. One level housing for seniors
maintained by an association?
14. Parks and open spaces?
15. Trails and bikeways?
16. Serviee establishments, sueh as
17. Retail shopping opportunities?
18. Entertainment establishments?
19. Dining establishments?
##. Light manufacturing facilities?
Turning to city services....
I would like to read you a list
one, please tell me whether you
service as excellent, good, only
ENO MAN LIT DKR
63% 1%i3 % 19%
72% 15% 7% 7%
gi%
7%
34% 8%
�;7 k$%
i8% 8%
58%
26%
9% 7%
39%
8%
36% l
4i%
7%
33% 20%
E
62%
7%
31%1%
cn�
37% 8%
53%
6%
41% 9%
62%
7%
31%1%
cn�
37% 8%
53%
6%
41% 9%
SO%
10% —49%
0%
of a few city services. For each
would rate the quality of the
fair, or poor....
20. Police protection?
21. Fire protection?
22. Storm drainage and flood
control?
23. Park maintenance?
24. Trail maintenance?
25. Animal control?
##. City street repair and
maintenance?
##. Snow plowing?
##. Street lighting?
##. Recycling Services?
EXCL GOOD FAIR POOR DK/R
94° 46% 5% I% 1%
44% 50% 0% i% 3%
i4%
72%
8%
3% 4%
-31%
67%
1%
9% i
31%
65%
1%
0% 3%
i2%
72%
55%
i% 9v
IF "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR," ASK: (n=80)
26. Why do you feel that way?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 34
LACK OF PATROLLING .....
4 34
FLOODING...............9-4%
28(�. Snew plewd6ng? 29%
LOOSE ANIMALS ..........
33%
WILDLIFE ISSUES .........§%
29 Street lighting 8%
POOR UPKEEP..............A
SLOW POLICE RESPONSE....
-34
NEED OWN POLICE DPT .....
s1%
SCATTERED................7-%
2q—Eby—street fep _r _-d
faalntenanee? "%
43%
34 12%
- -
28(�. Snew plewd6ng? 29%
60% i0%
26 0%
29 Street lighting 8%
58%i6%
6% 2$
2q—Eby—street fep _r _-d
faalntenanee? "%
43%
34 12%
9%
28(�. Snew plewd6ng? 29%
60% i0%
26 0%
29 Street lighting 8%
58%i6%
6% 2$
30. Are there current city services DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3%
you would like to see enhanced or NO.....................r%
new city services
you would
like
ROAD MAINTENANCE
....... 3§W
to see offered?
(IF "YES,"
ASK:)
STREET LIGHTS ...........
24
What would those
be?
erty taxes you pay
SCATTERED ................
64-
31. Compared to nearby cities, do you
think that the property taxes in
Andover are very high, somewhat
high, about average, somewhat low,
or very low?
32. Do you feel the quality of city
services has been able to keep
pace with growth in the city?
IF "NO," ASK: (n=16)
VERY HIGH ...............
SOMEWHAT HIGH .......... 3-3u
ABOUT AVERAGE ..........�G
SOMEWHAT LOW............3%
VERY LOW................84
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 44
YES.....................944G
NO......................44
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 3%
33. What services, in particular, have not been able to
keep pace?
RGAD HAITENANGE,99%;
FLGG91-NG
GGNT-RGT , 19%; TRAFFIC
Fi7GW, 13%; GODS
c•NFGRGEMENT
13%; SNGW PI�G)W-I"'NG, 6%.
34. When you consider the
city prop-
EXCELLENT................94
erty taxes you pay
and the quality
GOOD...................g54
of city services you
receive,
ONLY FAIR ...............
would you rate the
general value
POOR....................24
of city services as
excellent,
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......
good, only fair, or
poor?
Moving on....
35. What do you consider to be the greatest public safety con-
cern in Andover? (DO NOT READ LIST)
36. Do you have a second public safety concern in the city?
(DO NOT READ LIST)
FIRST SECOND
Violent crime............................0%........ 1%
Traffic speeding ........................29% 2%
Drugs...................................12 10%
Youth crimes and vandalism..............17 ....... 23P6.
Identity theft...........................3%........ 2%
Break-ins and theft from automobiles .... 12%....... 14%
Business crimes, such as shop-
lifting and check fraud.............4%........4%
Residential crimes, such as
burglary, and theft ................ 1-2% ....... e
ELSE (PEDESTRIAN SAFETY).................2% ........ 1%
NONE..... ... ..v6%. Ino
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.......................9%........2%
37. How would you rate the amount of
patrolling the Anoka County Sher-
iff's Department does in your
neighborhood -- would you say they
do too much, about the right
amount, or not enough?
T00 MUCH................2%
ABOUT RIGHT AMOUNT .....%
NOT ENOUGH.............2-9%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... $°s
38. How serious a problem is traffic VERY SERIOUS.............9%
speeding in your neighborhood -- SOMEWHAT SERIOUS.......39v
very serious, somewhat serious, NOT TOO SERIOUS ........ 9-7-°s
not too serious, or not at all NOT AT ALL SERIOUS ..... 2-"
serious? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
39. How safe would you feel walking VERY SAFE..............4-7%
alone in your neighborhood after REASONABLY SAFE........ 444
dark -- very safe, reasonably SOMEWHAT UNSAFE ......... 4&%
safe, somewhat unsafe, or very VERY UNSAFE.............3°v
unsafe? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... &%
Moving on....
40. How would you rate your ability EXCELLENT..............2--4
to get where you need to go in SATISFACTORY ............ 6%
Andover in a reasonable amount
of time -- excellent, satis-
factory, marginal, or poor?
MARGINAL ................
POOR.....................14
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.......$
IF "MARGINAL" OR "POOR," ASK: (n=31)
41. Why do you feel that way? TRAFFIC CONGESTION ..... 14P&
POTHOLES .................
TOO MANY STOPLIGHTS .... 24°s
TOO MANY STOP SIGNS .....%
If you work outside of the home,
about your own job; if you do not
please answer the next questions
spouse or partner, if applicable.
please answer the next questions
work outside of the home,
in terms of the job of your
42. What is your average commute time
to your job location?
43. In what city is your job located?
DON'T
KNOW/REFUSED......9$
5 MINUTES
OR LESS .......
4%
6 TO
10 MINUTES ........
a4P
11 TO
15 MINUTES.......3-7-fr
ANOKA...................44
16 TO
20 MINUTES .......
3-5-U
21 TO
30 MINUTES........
SAINT PAUL...............°s
OVER
30 MINUTES ........
2,LW
NOT APPLICABLE
.........
.&°e
NOT APPLICABLE .........
--9U
ANDOVER................°G
BLAINE..................5%
COON RAPIDS ............
4724
MINNEAPOLIS ............
144
ANOKA...................44
VARIES..................24
BROOKLYN PARK ............%
SAINT PAUL...............°s
FRIDLEY/COLUMBIA HGTS..._$
REST OF HENNEPIN CO ......%
REST OF METRO ............
6%
Moving on....
Currently, the City of Andover generally enforces codes concerning
residential property when a complaint is made. Some cities take a
more active approach and inspect residential neighborhoods for code
violations on an on-going basis.
51. Would you favor or oppose a more STRONGLY FAVOR ........... 7%
active approach by the City in the FAVOR...................38%
enforcement of residential pro- OPPOSE..................3-9%
perty codes? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) STRONGLY OPPOSE ......... 4-1%
Do you feel strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.......3%
For each of the following, please tell me whether the City is too
tough, about right, or not tough enough in enforcing city codes on
these nuisances.
52. Loose animals?
##. Dangerous Dogs/Cats?
53. Junk cars on residential
property?
54. Establishment and main-
tenance of lawns on
residential property?
55. Storage of boats on
residential property?
56. Storage of RVs on
residential property?
57. F4pkeeg eo ,.._._levarels—and
publie r}gh�c ef ways?
58. Upkeep and maintenance of
fences?
59. Upkeep and maintenance of
residential properties?
##. Tall Grass?
Continuing....
TOO
NOT
ABO
DK/
TOU
2%i3%
TOU
RIG
82%
REF
4%
?% 29% V2% i;
i% i3% &5% 1%
4% '3% 83% l%
�6 °6 83%i%
._ ..�.�.r�.e..,
U
nr.
63. Are you aware of open space areas YES....................4-9%
in the city? NO.....................3�
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4
IF "YES," ASK: (n=194)
64. Have you visited any open
space areas in the city?
(IF "YES," ASK:) Which
ones?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......�v
NO ......................
6-44
YES/DON'T REMEMBER
NAME.&W
BUNKER PARK.............g4
SUNSHINE PARK ...........
24
BUNKER BEACH ............
44
LIONS PARK..............3°v
WOODLAND................24
RUM RIVER REGIONAL
PARK.24
..
..
SCATTERED ...............
nr.
63. Are you aware of open space areas YES....................4-9%
in the city? NO.....................3�
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4
IF "YES," ASK: (n=194)
64. Have you visited any open
space areas in the city?
(IF "YES," ASK:) Which
ones?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......�v
NO ......................
6-44
YES/DON'T REMEMBER
NAME.&W
BUNKER PARK.............g4
SUNSHINE PARK ...........
24
BUNKER BEACH ............
44
LIONS PARK..............3°v
WOODLAND................24
RUM RIVER REGIONAL
PARK.24
KELSEY ROUND LAKE........A
SCATTERED ...............
Add list of open space parcels:
Martin's Meadows
Northwoods Preserve
Dalske Woodlands
Maple View
65. Do you think open space areas need YES ....................
to be accessible to the public? NO......................13%-
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......$
67. How often do you or members of FREQUENTLY.............
your household use city trails - OCCASIONALLY ........... 4$4
frequently, occasionally, rarely RARELY.................3-°U
or never? NEVER...................1-84
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 94
IF "FREQUENTLY" "OCCASIONALLY" OR `RARELY," ASK: (n=327)
68. What do you use them for most DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 4P6-
often?
°eoften? WALKING.................5-84
RUNNING/JOGGING .........1 G
BICYCLING..............2 4u
##. What could the City do to enhance
your use of the city trails?
69. Do you
support or oppose the use
STRONGLY SUPPORT ........1%
of city
funding for additional
SUPPORT................3-9%
trails
in the City? (WAIT FOR RE-
OPPOSE.................2-3°e
SPONSE)
Do you feel strongly that
STRONGLY OPPOSE .........§%
way?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......
44
##. How much would you be willing to NOTHING ................
see your property taxes increase $10.00 .................
in order to fund additional trails?$20.00.................
Would you be willing to $30.00 .................
pay $ per year? $40.00 .................
(CHOOSE RANDOM STARTING POINT; $50.00 ................
MOVE UP OR DOWN DEPENDING ON $60.00 ................
ANSWER) How about $ per year? $70.00 ................
(REPEAT PROCESS) $80.00 .................
$100.00 ................
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.....
Turning to parks and recreation:...
70. Overall, how would you rate the EXCELLENT..............3-74
city parks and recreation facile- GOOD....................7-6%
ties in Andover - excellent, good, ONLY FAIR...............§°s
only fair or poor? POOR....................3%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 2-°s
71. How often do you or members of FREQUENTLY.............2-4%
your household use city parks and OCCASIONALLY ........... 4-14
recreation facilities - frequent- RARELY.................4-44
ly, occasionally, rarely or never? NEVER..................2-9-9&
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 99e
IF "FREQUENTLY" "OCCASIONALLY" OR "RARELY," ASK: (n=319)
72. What do you use them for most DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......$%
often? EXERCISE...............4-1%
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT... -244
COMMUNITY CENTER .......3-fr
BALLFIELDS..............I"
FAMILY GATHERINGS ....... 3%
##. How safe do you feel when VERY SAFE ..............
visiting your neighborhood REASONABLY SAFE........
park? -- very safe, reasonably SOMEWHAT UNSAFE.........
safe, somewhat unsafe, or very VERY UNSAFE .............
unsafe? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......
For each of the following, please tell me if you think Andover's
facilities are much better in comparison to other cities, somewhat
better, about the same, somewhat worse or much worse in comparison
to other cities.
173. City park system?
74. Youth athletic facilities?
MBT SBT SAM SWR MWR DKR
8% 39% 58% 2%9% 34
4% 23% 596 5% 9%1.94
—
75. Adult recreation facilities? 3% 19% 65% 6% 9% 8%
As the City considers additional investments in city recreational
and community service facilities would you support additional
facilities for? :
#.#. Indoor activities or
Outdoor activities?
##. If "indoor", what specific activitv?
##. If "outdoor" what specific activitv?
69. Do you support or oppose the use STRONGLY SUPPORT.......
of city funding for additional SUPPORT ................
facilities in the City? WAIT FOR OPPOSE .................
RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly STRONGLY OPPOSE.........
that wav? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......
How much would you be willing to NOTHING.......
see your property taxes increase $10.00........
in order to fund additional facilites? $20.00........
Would you be willing to $30.00........
pay $ per year? $90.00...99.44
(CHOOSE RANDOM STARTING POINT; $50.00........
MOVE UP OR DOWN DEPENDING ON $60.00........
ANSWER) How about $ per year? $70.00........
(REPEAT PROCESS) $80.00........
$90.00........
$100.00.......
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.
The Andover YMCA Community Center is a public-private partnershi
between the City of Andover and the YMCA in which part of the
city -owned community center is leased to the YMCA for its space
and programming needs. Beyond the YMCA's programs, the city of
Andover manages the space and programming associated with the ice
arena, field house, library on the go services, and common areas
of the building.
76. Have you or members of
your house-
YES ....................
4-9$
hold used the Andover
Community
NO .......................
Center during the past
year?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ......
$$
##. Are your or members of your household
members of the Andover YMCA?
##. IF "No" ask:
Did you know as a resident you can
visit the YMCA four times annually
for free?
IF "YES," ASK: (n=197)
77. Overall, how would you rate EXCELLENT..............4-1�
the Community Center -- ex- GOOD...................3-7-W
cellent, good, only fair, or ONLY FAIR...............24
poor? POOR....................8%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0-;-
IF
%
IF "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR," ASK: (n=4)
78. Why did you rate it as (only fair/poor)?
79. How satisfied are you with
the current offerings at the
Community Center - very sat-
isfied, somewhat satisfied,
not too satisfied, or not at
all satisfied?
VERY SATISFIED.......... fr
SOMEWHAT SATISFIED..... 4-64
NOT TOO SATISFIED ....... 24
NOT AT ALL SATISFIED.... 4A
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3%
IF "NOT TOO SATISFIED" OR "NOT AT ALL SATISFIED," ASK:
(n=3)
80. y. . Why do fee }.h,« way
..y
What offerings would you
like to see or what current
offerings would you like to
see more or less of?
NOT ENGUGH PROGRAMS, 33• t NOT EN06G14- FOR Y99?46
GHT nnEN, 6 °P—.
81. Would you
favor or oppose the City
STRONGLY SUPPORT .......
3,1W
offering
a teen center in Andover?
SUPPORT ..................
(WAIT FOR
RESPONSE) Do you feel
OPPOSE .................
strongly
that way?
STRONGLY OPPOSE .........
24
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.......7v
81. Would you favor or oppose the City STRONGLY SUPPORT.......
offering senior programs in Andover? SUPPORT ................
(WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel OPPOSE ................
strongly that way? STRONGLY OPPOSE.........
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......
The City of Andover is considering taking on a role of
facilitatinq the coordination of communitv volunteers.
##. Should the City have a role in coordinating communit
volunteers?
Moving on....
84. What is your primary source of in- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ....... G4
formation about Andover City Gov- NONE....................3%
ernment and its activities? CITY NEWSLETTER........
LOCAL NEWSPAPER ........ 4-24
CABLE TELEVISION ........ 2-%
CITY WEBSITE ........... 3$G
WORD OF MOUTH...........3%
SCATTERED...............14
85. How would you prefer to receive DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......"
information about City Government NONE....................14
and its activities? CITY NEWSLETTER ........ g8%
LOCAL NEWSPAPER ........ 4-14
CABLE TELEVISION ........ 24
CITY WEBSITE ........... 1-14
WORD OF MOUTH ............A
MEETINGS................24
SCATTERED...............44
The City publishes a bi-monthly newsletter, called "Andover
Today."
86. Do you receive this newsletter?
(IF "YES," ASK:) How would you
rate the format -- excellent,
good, only fair or poor?
IF "YES," ASK: (n=369)
87. How much of the city news-
letter do you read -- all of
it, most of it, some of it,
or very little?
NO......................5%
YES/EXCELLENT .......... 444
YES/GOOD.................
YES/ONLY FAIR...........34°
YES/POOR................9%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 94
ALL OF IT...............a-"
MOST OF IT.............4g4
SOME OF IT..............1 U
VERY LITTLE.............2%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 9%
##. Should the City increase the
frequency of the city newsletter?
88. Does your household currently sub- CABLE..................3-5%
scribe to cable television, sat- SATELLITE..............424
ellite television or neither? NEITHER.................1�
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... G4
IF "YES," ASK: (n=219)
89. How often do you watch An-
dover City Council Meetings
FREQUENTLY..............5%
OCCASIONALLY ........... 23%
or City Commission meetings,
such as Planning and Park and
Recreation, on channel 16 --
frequently, occasionally,
rarely or not at all?
##. Would you support a local
government news program?
90. Do you have access to the Internet
at home or work? (WAIT FOR RE-
SPONSE) Have you accessed the
city website from either location?
IF "YES/YES," ASK: (n=185)
91
Did you find the information
you were looking for?
IF "YES," ASK: (n=181)
92. What information do you
look for most often on
the city's website?
IF "NO" IN QUESTION #91, ASK
93. What information were
you looking for?
RARELY.................13%
NOT AT ALL.............58%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
YES/YES................46%
YES/NO.................43%
NO.....................11%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
YES....................98%
NO......................2%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
JUST BROWSING .......... 42%
BUDGET INFORMATION ...... 7%
COUNCIL DECISIONS ....... 8%
PARKS AND RECREATION... 30%
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .... 2%
CITY CODES..............6%
GENERAL INFORMATION ..... 2%
COMMUNITY ED ............ 2%
CITY EVENTS.............2%
(n=4)
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT... 75%
CITY NEWS..............25%
94. How interested would you be VERY INTERESTED ......... 28%
in subscribing to receive SOMEWHAT INTERESTED ..... 35%
e-mails containing city infor- NOT TOO INTERESTED ...... 15%
mation and news - very inte- NOT AT ALL INTERESTED... 21%
rested, somewhat interested, DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ....... 2%
not too interested or not at
all interested?
95. Are you aware the City of NO......................41%
Andover is on Facebook? (IF YES/YES.................24%
"YES," ASK:) Do you view the YES/NO..................35%
city's Facebook page? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ....... 1%
96. How would you rate the City's EXCELLENT..............15%
overall performance in communicat- GOOD...................71%
ing key local issues to residents ONLY FAIR..............10%
in its publications, newspaper POOR....................2%
columns, and on cable television DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 2%
-- excellent, good, only fair, or
poor?
Now just a few more questions for demographic purposes....
97. How often
would you say you vote
ALWAYS.................69%
-- always,
nearly always, part of
NEARLY ALWAYS ..........
25%
the time,
or seldom?
PART OF THE TIME ........
4%
SELDOM..................3%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......
0%
From time to time, cities and school districts ask voters to
approve referendum proposals...
98. Thinking about past city and
school district referendum elec-
tions, would you say you always
vote, often vote, sometimes vote,
rarely vote or never vote?
ALWAYS VOTE ............ 63%
OFTEN VOTE.............26%
SOMETIMES VOTE.......... 6%
RARELY VOTE.............4%
NEVER VOTE..............2%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
Could you please tell me how many people in each of the following
age groups live in your household. Let's start with the oldest.
Be sure to include yourself.
99. First, persons 65 or over? NONE...................84%
ONE.....................6%
TWO OR MORE ............ 10%
100. Adults, 18 to 65?
NONE...................10%
ONE.....................6%
TWO....................73%
THREE OR MORE.......... 11%
101. School -aged or pre-school
children?
102. What is your age, please?
103. Do you own or rent your present
residence? (IF "OWN," ASK:) Which
of the following categories would
contain the approximate value of
your residential property -- under
$200,000, $200,000-$250,000,
$250,001-$300,000, $300,001-
$350,000, $350,001-$400,000 or
over $400,000?
104. Gender (BY OBSERVATION)
105. REGION OF CITY
NONE...................52%
ONE....................14%
TWO....................25%
THREE OF MORE ........... 9%
18-24 ...................3%
25-34 ..................15%
35-44 ..................28%
45-54 ..................28%
55-64 ..................16%
65 AND OVER ............ 11%
REFUSED.................0%
RENT....................7%
OWN/UNDER $200,000......9%
OWN/$200,000-$250,000..31%
OWN/$250,001-$300,000..360
OWN/$300,001-$350,000..11%
OWN/$350,001-$400,000...2%
OWN/OVER $400,000.......2%
DON'T KNOW..............1%
REFUSED.................2%
MALE...................49%
FEMALE.................51%
PCT 1 ..................11%
PCT 2 ..................10%
PCT 3 ..................12%
PCT 4 ...................9%
PCT 5 ..................11%
PCT 6 ...................8%
PCT 7 ...................8%
PCT8 ...................9%
PCT 9 ...................9%
PCT 10 .................12%
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: David D. Berkowitz, Director of P1�1c Aorks / City Engineer
SUBJECT: Discuss City Tree Pruning and Removal Process - Engineering
DATE: February 28, 2017
■
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is requested to discuss with Public Works staff tree pruning and tree removal
practices within City right-of-way, City owned property and City Parks.
DISCUSSION
Jason Grode, Parks Maintenance Supervisor and Mark Becker, Street Maintenance Supervisor will
provide information on the City's practices for tree pruning and removal and after the presentation
open up discussion and answer questions related to the current process.
ACTION REQUIRED
This item is for discussion and no formal action is required.
Respectfully submitted,
.—vo-1 1
David D. Berkowitz
ANDOVEA T Y O F
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers i
CC: James Dickinson City Administrator
FROM: Dana Makinen, Human Resources ager
SUBJECT: City of Andover Communications
DATE: February 23, 2017
INTRODUCTION
Communication in government serves to communicate and deliver messages directly to citizens
and encourage citizen involvement; and to provide a mechanism for interaction and feedback
from citizens.
Currently the City of Andover has many different ways in which we communicate with the
residents including: the City Website, email, Facebook, Twitter, City Newsletter, Electronic
Message board, QCTV and print materials.
The City Council is requested to discuss current City communications.
DISCUSSION
Website/Email:
The City Website, www.andovermn.eov is primarily managed by each individually represented
department with the IT department as the overseer of the basic function. If a department would
like to get information out to the public they can put it on their department specific web page on
the site, and/or there is a general City News tab available.
Through the city website, residents are encouraged to sign up for email notifications on areas of
interest for them. One example of this is the calendar for the warming houses, subscribers are
notified if anything changed regarding the warming house schedule. Those subscribers were sent
emails or texts (resident preference) if a change had occurred. Currently we have 41 subscribers
to Community Events, our largest subscriber group.
Facebook:
The City of Andover has 3 Facebook pages, City of Andover, MN, Andover Fire Department,
MN and Andover Community Center.
City of Andover, MN is currently managed by the Human Resources department and has posts
about upcoming City events such as Recycling Day, Fun Fest, Mayor's Prayer Breakfast,
Mayor's Water Challenge, North Suburban Home Show, etc. This site also provided City related
information on parking on city streets during heavy snow, new parks or open space highlights,
road restrictions, city sponsored tree plantings and other more informative posts. Currently the
City of Andover, MN site has 2,197 followers on it.
The Fire Department manages Andover Fire Department, MN, and has primarily public safety
information on it and has 2,827 followers.
The Community Center manages Andover Community Center and posts about upcoming events
such as Learn to Skate, Tot Time, Pickleball, and other events occurring at the Community
Center. They have 570 page followers.
Twitter:
Twitter, C 61yofandovermn, is currently managed primarily by the building department, and is
limited to 165 words or less with no pictures, so it is brief snippets of news and will refer people
to the city website for more information. The City has 565 followers.
Newsletter:
The City Newsletter, Andover Today, is distributed to all residents of Andover 6 times per year.
Departments submit articles, there's a Council Update, regular information on rules/regulations,
tax information, contact information and upcoming City events such as: Fun Fest, Animal
Vaccination, Annual Garage Sale, Community Center, etc. ECM helps format this newsletter and
prints them. The post office then sends them out.
Other (Message Boards, OCTV, Print Media, & Outside Organizations):
There are 2 Electronic Message boards that are handled by the City Clerk's office and the focus is
on community events and brief city reminders.
QCTV, Quad Cities Cable Commission, is a great resource of communication. They tape and
broadcast all of the City Council, Planning & Zoning Commission and Parks & Recreation
Commission meetings, in addition they do a monthly News & Views segment. They also do a
Public Safety show and will do other special shows on current Andover events.
Other communication is through printed media. Departments send out meeting notices, public
hearing notices, and information reminders (recycling). These are primarily as needed and are the
most expensive to send out.
Finally, we work with the local Chamber of Commerce and other Agencies such as Anoka
County, to post their events and in return they post ours.
ACTION REOUESTED
The City Council is requested to discuss current City communications
Respectfully submitted,
Dana Makinen
Y O F
OVE.
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Councilmembers
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
December 2016 General Fund Budget Progress Report
February 28, 2017
INTRODUCTION
The City of Andover 2016 General Fund Budget contains total revenues of $10,390,411 and total
expenditures of $11,003,788 (includes $56,000 of 2015 budget carry forwards primarily for
elections and facility management and a Council approved $250,000 transfer to the Trail Fund ); a
decrease in fund balance is planned.
Monthly reporting of the City Budget progress to the Governing body is a recommended financial
practice and often viewed positively by rating agencies.
DISCUSSION
Attached is the General Fund Revenue & Expenditure Budget Summary - Budget Year 2016,
reflecting year to date actual through December 2016. The attachments are provided to assist
discussion in reviewing 2016 progress; other documents may be distributed at the meeting.
Please note the December 2016 report is unaudited.
The following represents Administration's directives and departmental expectations that were in
place for 2016:
1. Expenditure budgets while approved, expenses are to meet with the spirit that needs are
fulfilled first, expansions of service and special requests are to be reviewed with City
Administration before proceeding.
2. Departments are to be committed to search for the best possible prices when purchasing
goods and services.
3. Departments are to be committed to continually searching out new efficiencies and to
challenge the status quo of how the City provides services.
4. Departments are to be committed to searching out collaborative opportunities to facilitate
efficient and cost-effective utilization of governmental assets and personnel.
5. Departments are to be committed to developing effective, consistent and ongoing
communications with City residents, businesses and other stakeholders.
6. Departments are to be cognizant that services provided are subject to available revenues and
should not commit to services that are not sustainable.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is requested to receive a presentation from staff.
miffed,
CITY OF ANDOVER
General Fund Budget Summary Totals
Budget Year 2016
2015 1 2016
REVENUES Budget Dec YTD %Bud YE Budget Dec YTD %Bud
General Property Tax
$ 7,706,892
$ 7,634,714
99%
$ 7,634,714
$ 8,113,528
$ 8,217,768
101%
Licenses and Permits
316,588
452,422
143%
452,422
346,205
625,907
181%
Intergovernmental
633,015
749,571
118%
749,570
673,248
733,951
109%
Charges for Services
748,550
804,228
107%
804,228
767,950
857,163
98%
Fines
100,750
99,304
99%
99,304
100,750
88,600
88%
Investment Income
75,000
63,709
85%
63,709
75,000
43,747
58%
Miscellaneous
98,850
154,889
157%
154,890
116,800
194,802
167%
Transfers In
196,930
196,930
100%
196,930
196,930
196,930
100%
Total Revenues
S 9,876,575
$ 10,155,767
103%
S 10,155,767
S 10,390,411
$ 10,958,868
105
Total Expenditures $ 10,564,730 $ 10,014,451 95% S 10,089,997 $ 10,956,288 $ 10,507,349 96%
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) $ (688,155) $ 141,316 $ 65,770 $ (565,877) $ 451,519
2015
2016
EXPENDITURES
Budget
Dec YTD
%Bud
YE
Budget
Dec YTD
%Bud
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
Mayor and Council
$ 87,154
$ 85,028
98%
$ 85,061
$ 88,780
$ 86,990
98%
Administration
180,888
172,110
95%
172,296
192,778
187,876
97%
Newsletter
26,000
21,042
81%
21,042
26,000
22,731
87%
Human Resources
34,643
15,875
46%
15,909
35,260
13,403
38%
Attorney
182,000
180,313
99%
180,313
187,640
184,990
99%
City Clerk
135,359
134,763
100%
134,776
157,075
148,338
94%
Elections
57,492
14,496
25%
14,496
82,919
64,433
78%
Finance
245,494
240,305
98%
240,317
261,016
252,563
97%
Assessing
150,000
143,431
96%
146,315
150,000
146,472
98%
Information Services
172,239
131,742
76%
131,745
168,483
151,386
90%
Planning & Zoning
412,937
405,847
98%
406,045
435,606
414,141
95%
Engineering
470,631
464,780
99%
464,842
509,514
511,074
100%
Facility Management
579,802
478,008
82%
498,813
528,201
408,249
77%
Total General Gov
2,734,639
2,487,740
91%
2,511,970
2,823,272
2,592,646
92
PUBLICSAFETY
Police Protection
2,918,308
2,918,308
100%
2,918,308
2,936,467
2,936,467
100%
Fire Protection
1,192,330
1,141,300
96%
1,165,221
1,294,795
1,285,416
99%
Protective Inspection
423,161
390,707
92%
391,948
441,807
424,247
96%
Civil Defense
39,189
24,352
62%
24,352
22,982
17,495
76%
Animal Control
9,950
3,470
35%
3,498
7,950
3,700
47%
Total Public Safety
4,582,938
4,478,137
98%
4,503,327
4,704,001
4,667,325
99
PUBLIC WORKS
Streets and Highways
625,664
629,262
101%
629,724
656,237
686,087
105%
Snow and lee Removal
539,770
442,021
82%
442,077
563,587
468,174
83%
Street Signs
203,533
203,135
100%
204,494
204,193
167,283
82%
Traffic Signals
35,000
28,648
82%
30,169
35,000
25,543
73%
Street Lighting
36,400
30,664
84%
30,664
36,400
37,089
102%
Street Lights - Billed
216,000
198,072
92%
201,501
217,500
200,509
92%
Park & Recreation
1,185,338
1,138,634
96%
1,151,313
1,257,247
1,247,501
99%
Natural Resource Preservation
-
-
0%
-
7,596
7,255
96%
Recycling
135,120
126,160
92%
128,038
130,927
124,860
95%
Total Public Works
2,351,161
2,167,334
92%
2,817,980
3,108,687
2,964,301
95%
OTHER
Miscellaneous
231,728
221,478
96%
221,478
281,728
258,577
92%
Youth Services
38,600
30,500
79%
35,242
38,600
24,500
63%
Total Other
270,328
251,978
93%
256,720
320,328
283,077
88
Total Expenditures $ 10,564,730 $ 10,014,451 95% S 10,089,997 $ 10,956,288 $ 10,507,349 96%
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) $ (688,155) $ 141,316 $ 65,770 $ (565,877) $ 451,519
0
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: January 2017 City Investments Review
DATE: February 28, 2017
INTRODUCTION
Summary reporting of the City Investment portfolio to the Governing body is a recommended
financial practice and often viewed positively by rating agencies.
Furthermore, the City of Andover Investment Policy recommends the Finance Director presents
to the City Council at least quarterly the type of investments held by the City.
DISCUSSION
Attached is the Investment Maturities Summary for January 2017, the January 2017
Investment Detail Report, and the January 2017 Money Market Funds Report. These
attachments are intended to assist with discussion when reviewine the January 2017
investments.
ACTION REQUESTED
Informational. The Council is requested to review and provide feedback to staff.
lly submitted,
Investment Maturities - January 2017
Investment Maturities (in Years)
Credit Fair
Less Than
More Than
Investment Type Rating Value
1 1 -5
6- 10
10
Money market funds N/A $ 428,364
$ 428,364 $
$
$
MN Municipal Money
Market Fund (4M) N/A 5,004
5,004
Premier Banks Money
Market Fund N/A 260,869
260,869
Certificates of deposit FDIC 13,103,047
8,992,375 4,110,672
-
Local governments A/Al/A2 643,600
70,297 409,412
60,119
103,772
AAI/AA2/AA3 7,821,501
1,677,736 4,379,728
1,251,567
512,470
AAA 3,618,226
523,283 2,714,593
380,350
-
_
219,248
_
-
State governments A/Al/A2 -
- -
AAl/AA2/AA3 2,535,008
1,018,823 1,296,938
AAA 601,203
U.S. agencies AAA 3,956,677
201,098 195,885
204,220
-
950,295 2,884,829
121,553
FNMA REMIC N/A 3,026
- 3,026
-
-
U.S. agencies N/A 1,456,679
719,150 737,529
-
Total investments 3F 34,433,204
$ 14,847,294 1$ 16,732,610
$ 2,115,505
$ 737,795
Deposits 3,433,762
Total cash and investments $ 37,866,965
January 2017 Investment Detail
Description
Cusip
Number
Credit
Rating/F
DIC #
Type
Purchase
Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
Interest Paid
Date
Acquired
Coupon
Date
Maturity/
Due Date
First Slate Community Bank
33708UBZ1
17323
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.500%
245,017.15
monthly
05/27/16
06/27/16
02/27/17
Homestreet Bank
43785QHZ9
32489
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.500%
245,017.15
monthly
05/27/16
06/27/16
02/27117
City Nag Bk FL Miami
17801DBPO
20234
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.550%
245,007.35
maturity
12/02/16
none
03/02/17
Citizens Bk PA Philadelphia
17417QDA8
57282
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.550%
245,007.35
maturity
12/07/16
none
03/07117
Bank Baroda New York BRH
06062QYK4
33681
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.650%
245,031.85
maturity
12/09/16
none
03/09117
Merchants Bank of Indiana
588493GY6
8056
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.650%
245,036.75
maturity
12/16/16
none
03/16117
Metabank Storm Lake Iowa
59101LAF4
30776
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.550%
245,007.35
maturity
12/16/16
none
03/16/17
CIBM Bk Champaign III
12545JAJ4
11729
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.600%
245,022.05
maturity
12/22/16
none
03/22/17
Dallas Cap Bk NA
234553AKI
20727
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.500%
244,987.75
maturity
12/23/16
none
03/23/17
Beal Bk USA Las Vegas NV
07370WF50
57833
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.650%
245,039.20
maturity
12/28116
none
03/29/17
Luther Burbank Savings
550551BM6
32178
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.550%
245,000.00
maturity
12/30/16
none
03/30/17
TCM Bank
872308CB5
34535
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.650%
245,039.20
maturity
05/31116
none
03/31/17
Peoples Ltd Bk Bridgeport CT
7127000G4
27334
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.600%
244,992.65
maturity
01/18/17
none
04/18/17
Amex Centurion Bank
02587DE61
27471
CD
248,000.00
248,000.00
248,000.00
0.900%
248,138.88
semi-annual
10/28/15
04/28/16
04/28/17
Blue Hills Bk Boston MA
095577DY5
90160
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.650%1
244,985.30
maturity
01/25/17
none
05/25/17
CIT Bank NA
12556LAA4
58978
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.650%
245,063.70
maturity
05/31/16
none
none
05/31/17
06/02/17
Bank of America
06051VZY5
3510
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.700%
245,056.35
maturity
06/02/16
RBS Citizens NA Providence RI
75524KFZ2
57957
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.700%
245,024.50
maturity
12/07/16
none
06/07117
State Bank India NY
8562845G5
_ 33682
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.750%
245,068.60
maturity
12/12/16
none
06/12/17
Bank of Ruston LA
06427LBV6
06426TZ69
084601GP2
70337MAR9
14042E400
46176PFF7
29700
33653
23621
33928
_ 4297
28892
CD
CD
CD
_CD
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.650%
244,980.40
maturity
maturity
maturity
maturity
12/14/16
12/15/16
12/30/16
none
none
06/14/17
06/15/17
06/30/17
Bank of China NY
Berkshire Bk Pittsfield MA
Patriot Bank NA
Capital One NA
Investors Savings Bank
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.700%
245,024.50
245,000.00
245,000.00
248,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.750%
245,075.95
245,176.40
248,357.12
none
245,000.00
0.850%
1.150%
12/30/16
none
06/30/17
248,000.00
248,000.00
semi-annual
07/15/15
01/15/16
07/17/17
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.650%
245,080.85
maturity
07/21/16
none
07/21/17
Champlain Nall Bk Elizbt
158716AU4
7356
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.700%
245,024.50
maturity
12/29/16
none
07128/17
First Foundation Bank
32026UCN4
58647
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.700%
244,919.15
maturity
12/16/16
none
09/15/17
Bank Leumi USA
063248GF9
19842
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.850%
245,137.20
maturity
12/22/16
none
09/22/17
Mercantil CommeroeBank
58733ADB2
22953
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.900%
245,075.95
semi-annual
07/12/16
12/29/16
09/29/17
Farmers& Merchants Svgs Bk
30856PAG1
9298
CD
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
1.050%
249,883.95
monthly
01122116
02/22/16
10/23/17
Washington Trust Company
940637HU8
23623
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.750%
244,779.50
maturity
12/05/16
none
11/17117
1 Year CD - Premier Bank
1091003210
21714
CD
251,504.10
251,504.10
251,504.10
0.700%
251,504.10
maturity
12/16/16
none
12/16117
1 Year CD - Premier Bank Rochester
2055214401
33202
CD
246,474.02
246,474.02
246,474.02
0.600%
246,474.02
246,474.02
maturity
maturity
12/16116
12/16/16
none
none
12/16117
1 Year CD - Premier Bank MN
3041574901
33204
CD
246,474.02
246,474.02
246,474.02
0.600%
12/16/17
Valley Cent Svgs Bk Reading OH
91944RAE8
28555
CD
150,000.00
150,000.00
150,000.00
t.250%
150,418.50
monthly
12/22114
01/22/15
12/22/17
Safra National Bk
78658QD59
26876
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
1.000%
245,112.70
maturity
12/29/16
none
12/28117
BankUmted NA
066519CT4
58979
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
1.100%
245,333.20
maturity
12/29116
none
12/29/17
Kaufman TX
486206KKO
A3
local
61,128.00
61,128.00
60,000.00
4.000%
60,057.00
annual
06/28/16
none
02/15/17
Augusta ME
051411ND4
A3
local
11,250.00
11,250.00
10,000.00
5.250%
10,239.50
semi-annual
03/07/12
none
10/01/17
North Mankato MN Port Auth Com
660760AG4
AA
local
107,657.00
107,657.00
100,000.00
4.000%
100,000.00
semi-annual
09/20/13
none
02/01/17
Philadelphia PA Auth Zero Coupon
71781LBJ7
AA
local
161,700.00
161,700.00
245,000.00
244,608.00
maturity
01/12/10
none
04/15/17
Osseo MN ISD#279
688443,127
AAI
local
30,103.25
30,103.25
25,000.00
6.000%
25,000.00
semi-annual
12/22/11
none
02/01/17
8,992,375.14 CD
Description
Cusip
Number
Credit
Rating/F
DIC #
Type
Purchase
Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
Interest Paid
Date
Acquired
Coupon
Date
Maturity)
Due Date
McKinney TX
Regl Transprin Dist, Denver
Dane County WI _
Buffalo MN IS_ D_#877
Waterloo IA _ _
Prior Lake MN
Tucson AZ
Maple Grove MN
Ramsey Cnty MN
581646Y91
759136RR7
AA1 _
_ AA1
_ AA1
AA2 _
AA2 _
AA2
AA3
AAA
AAA
local
126,856.25
126,856.25
254,312.50
106,487.00
264,250.00
105,594.00
125,000.00
250,000.00
1.472%
125,162.50
251,037.50
100,849.00
semi-annual
semi-annual
05/20/15
07/12/16
none
11/01/13
08/15/17
local
local
local
254,312.50
2.000%
11/01/17
236091M92
106,487.00
264,250.00
100,000.00
2.450%
semi-annual
07116112
none
12/01/17
119655PS1
250,000.00
100,000.00
4.050%
250,000.00
semi-annual
semi-annual
03/10/15
02/24/15
05/14/15
12/09/15
01/10113
08112114
none
02/01/17
941647KE8
742617CB7
local
105,594.00
3.500%
100,693.00
none
12115/15
06/01117
local
local
230,000.00
254,202.50
230,000.00
254,202.50
230,000.00
1.000%
229,383.60
251,002.50
220,000.00
100,000.00
86,896.35
116,386.90
semi-annual
12115117
898711 Q33
250,000.00
2.139%
semi-annual
none
07101117
56516PNY5
kcal
local
230,520.40
100,000.00
230,520.40
100,000.00
220,000.00
2.000%
1.130%
5.500%
semi-annual
08101113
02/01/17
751622JG7
100,000.00
semi-annual
02101115
02/01/17
_ _
Tennessee Valley Auth
880591 EA6
_
AAA
local
93,153.11
93,153.11
85,000.00
semi-annual
06/01/09
01/18/08
07/18/17
Washington County MN
937791KL4
AAA
local
115,000.00
115,000.00
115,000.00
3.750%
semi-annual
07/01/10
01/01/11
01/01/18
Minnesota St
New Hampshire Sl H_sg
6041291792
AM
state
811,520.00
811,520.00
800,000.00
2.000%
803,240.00
215,582.65
semi-annual
07/05116
none
08/01/17
64469DWUl
AA2
state
215,819.15
215,819.15
215,000.00
1.789%
semi-annual
12/09/15
07/01/16
01101/18
_
Tennessee State
880541QM2
AAA
state
201,894.00
201,894.00
200,000.00
2.326%
201,098.00
semi-annual
110/26/11
02101/12
08/01/17
Fanner Mac _
Fed Farm Credit Bank
Fed Farm Credit Bank
Fed Farm Credit Bank
Fed Home Ln Bank_
FICOStrip Pdn Zero Coupon
FICO Strip Pm-4ZeroCoupon
FICO Strip Cpn-E Zero Coupon
Synovus Bank
Capital One Bank (USA)
Key Bank National Association
BMW Bank of North America
Ally Bank Midvale Utah_
31315PZV4
3133EE6A3
AAA_
AAA
AAA
AAA
AAA
_
873
33954_
17534
_35141
57803
US
200,584.00
200,584.00
200,000.00
200,000.00
1.140%
0.590%
0.900%
200,010.00
200,006.00
100,082.00
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
03/21/16
12/09/15
11/04/13
12/08/15
07/08116
10/23/15
03/16/15
08/03/12
02/06/16
12/08112
02/03/17
US
200,000.00
99,647.00
200,000.00
99,647.00
199,800.00
251,187.50
295,932.00
194,572.00
215,452.16
244.999.78
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
02106117
06/08/17
3133EATE8
US
100,000.00
3133ECA95
US
199,800.00
200,000.00
250,000.00
0.790%
1.000%
199,992.00
250,205.00
298,164.00
198,794.00
222,192.32
14,153,056.96
245,154.35
244,326.25
244,500.20
246,180.90
243,556.95
03118113
09118/17
3130A15P9
31771KAC1_
31771EAD3
31771JXM7
87164DHW3
140420ZQ6
49306SWQ5
05580ADR2
US
251,187.50
none_
none
09/26/17
US
295,932.00
300,000.00
1.000%
0.900%
0.850%
1.600%
maturity
maturity
10/06/17
US
194,572.00
200,000.00
none
10/06/17
US
215,452.16
244,999.78
245,000.00
224,000.00
maturity
12/11114
12/05/16
07/13/16
07/13/16
01/22/16
none
11102117
CD
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
none
01113/17
04113118
semi-annual
07113/18
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
semi-annual
semi-annual
01113117
07/13/18
CO
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
07122/16
01/22/19
02006LF32
245,000.00
245,000.00
1.200%
semi-annual
06/30116
12/30/16
07/01/19
Barclays Bank _ _
Synchrony Bank
06740KHB6
57203
CO
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.050%
250,336.97
250,287.57
243,260.50
semi-annual
07/03/14
01/02/15
07/02/19
87164WBT4
CD
247,000.00
245,000.00
247,000.00
245,000.00
247,000.00
2.050%
1.100%
semi-annual
07/11/14
01/11/15
07/11/19
_
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
48125Y51.4
_27314
628
CD
245,000.00
quarterly
07115/16
10/15/16
07115119
PrivateBank&Trust Co
74267GUQ8
33306
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.000%
250,302.39
semi-annual
07121114
01/21/15
07122/19
Goldman Sachs Bank USA
38147JU59
33124
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.050%
250,057.86
semi-annual
07/23114
01/23115
07123/19
First Federal Svgs_ Bk_
Victory Bank
32021YCH4
29690
CD
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
1.500%
252,508.41
250,332.03
monthly
01/21/16
09/24/14
02/21116
08/21/19
92644LAB8
58615
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.000%
semi-annual
03124/15
09/24/19
Third Federal S_av&Loan
Celtic Bank
Steams Bank NA_
88413QAW8
30012
CD
128,000.00
128,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
249,000.00
128,000.00
2.000%
2.050%
1.000%
130,091.52
252,110.43
251,139.72
253,945.14
252,580.62
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
11/24114
12/20113
12/2_6/14
05/24/15
11/25/19
12/20/19
12126/19
15118RJMO
857894PB9
57056 _
_10988
1402
_CD
CD
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
_ 247,000.00
249,000.00
06/20/14
06/26/15
Citizens Alliance Bank
Enerbank USA
17318LAP9
249,000.00
2.000%
monthly
06/27114
07/27/14
06/26/20
29266NA31
57293
CD
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
2.100°/n
monthly
07/16/14
08/18/14
07/20/20
_
Elbow Lake MN
284281KC5
A
local
170,045.70
170,045.70
165,000.00
60,000.00
2.750%
6.250%
169,016.10
62,980.20
semi-annual
12/08114
08/16/10
none
none
12/01/19
_ _
Oneida County NY
682454382
Al
local
68,632.80
68,632.80
semi-annual
04/15119
2,271,315.85 local
1,219,920.65 state
1,669,445.32 US
Less Than 1 Year
4,110,671.81 CD
Description
Cusip
Number
Credit
Rating/F
DIC #
Type
Purchase
price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
Interest Paid
Date
Acquired
Coupon
Date
Maturity/
Due Date
Junction City Kansas
481502F72
A2
local
101,558.00
101,558.00
100,000.00
5.500%
105,829.00
semi-annual
semi-annual
05128/08
03/01/09
09/01/18
Kaufman TX
486206KLB
A3
local
72,922.50
72,922.50
70,000.00
4.000%
71,586.90
06/28116
02/15/17
02/15/18
Farmington MN
311297W84
AA
local
102,787.00
102,787.00
100,000.00
2.000%
101,645.00
semi-annual
07/06116
none
02/01/19
Rice Cnty MN
762698GK8
AA
local
45,466.80
45,466.80
40,000.00
4.400%
42,263.20
semi-annual
03/07112
none
02/01/19
Racine WI
7500216D4
AA-
local
101,792.00
101,792.00
100,000.00
2.100%
100,744.00
semi-annual
01/24/12
06/01/12
06/01/18
Indiana St Bond Bank
454624S40
AA+
local
146,123.60
146,123.60
140,000.00
4.302%
144,806.20
semi-annual
12/30116
none
08/01/18
Minnetrista MN
604229KE3
AA-
local
10,000.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
145,000.00
2.450%
4.500%
10,009.00
145,375.55
semi-annual
10/10113
08101114
02/01/19
Ramsey MN
751813PB6
AA+
local
158,677.85
158,677.85
semi-annual
02/16112
04/01/16
04/01/19
Rothsay MN ISO #850
778731AZ2
AA+
local
208,640.25
208,640.25
195,000.00
3.000%
204,594.00
semi-annual
07/06/16
none
02/01/20
Saint Paul MN Port Auth
793067CC1
AA+
local
79,756.80
79,756.80
80,000.00
2.000%
79,936.80
semi-annual
01/10117
09/01/17
03/01/20
Steams Co MN
857896MH4
AA,
local
276,875.00
276,875.00
250,000.00
4.500%
251,997.50
semi-annual
04/17/13
none
06/01/20
Minnetdsta MN
604229KGB
AA+
local
161,038.40
161,038.40
160,000.00
3.100%
160,136.00
semi-annual
10/10/13
08/01/14
02/01/21
Greenway MN ISD #31
39678LDF6
AA+
local
27,593.50
27,593.50
25,000.00
5.000°.
26,564.25
semi-annual
07/09/13
none
03/15/21
Minneapolis MN
60374YF93
AA1
_W1
local
220,938.00
220,938.00
200,000.00
4.000%
206,104.00
semi-annual
03/04/14
none
03/01/18
New York City NY Transitional
649710TU7
local
100,440.00
100,440.00
100,000.00
1.600%
100,053.00
semi-annual
01/27117
none
05/01/18
Scott County IA
809486EZ2
AA1
local
114,450.33
112,617.00
100,000.00
4.400%
102,739.00
semi-annual
10/31/12
12/01/12
06/01/18
King Cnty, WA
49474E3L5
AA1
local
224,634.00
224,634.00
200,000.00
3.980%
208,414.00
semi-annual
03/27/12
none
12/01/18
Minneapolis MN
60374YS73
AA1
local
111,898.00
111,898.00
100,000.00
3.250%
103,646.00
semi-annual
06/05/12
12/01111
12/01/18
Cedar Rapids IA
Minneapolis MN
Hampton VA
Middleton WI
Des Moines IA Area Cmnty Col
Hopkins Minn ISD#270
Orono MN ISD#278
Orange Beach ALA
150528RM1
AA1
local
217,672.00
217,672.00
200,000.00
3.000%
206,370.00
semi-annual
06/11/13
02/26/13
01/20/16
02/24/15
11/10/14
12/01/13
none
none
none
06/01/19
60374YS81
AA1
local
278,632.50
278,632.50
250,000.00
3.500%
262,662.50
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
12/01/19
04/01/20
4095582J1
AA1
local
100,836.00
100,836.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
2.209%
3.750%
2.450%
5.250%
4.000%
100,530.00
103,098.00
50,910.00
82,944.80
113,328.60
248,743.20
596782RX2
250097H21
439881HCO
687136LA7
68406PHF1
AA1
AA1
AA2
AA2
AA2
local
local
local
local
106,979.00
50,606.00
95,278.40
115,511.00
106,979.00
50,606.00
09/01/20
06/01/21
50,000.00
80,000.00
110,000.00
12/01/14
95,278.40
04/30/12
08/01/09
02/01/18
115,511.00
08/04/16
02/01/17
02/01/18
local
241,689.60
241,689.60
240,000.00
4.400%
semi-annual
08/05/10
02/01/11
02/01/19
Sioux City IA
829458FC7
_
AA2
local
156,100.50
156,100.50
155,000.00
2.000%
156,401.20
semi-annual
12/22/16
none
06/01/19
Waterloo IA
941647PAl
AA2
local
50,559.50
50,559.50
50,000.00
2.000%
50,413.50
semi-annual
06/27/13
12/01/13
06/01/19
Western Lake Superior MN
958522WU4
AA2
local
100,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
3.150%
103,365.00
semi-annual
08/16/11
04/01/12
10/01/19
Portsmouth VA
73723RSL8
AA2
local
286,268.00
286,268.00
295,000.00
2.400%
298,259.75
semi-annual
07/17/13
02/01/14
02/01/20
Brunswick Cnty
117061VH1
AA2
local
108,967.10
108,967.10
110,000.00
1.740%
109,424.70
semi-annual
08/21/15
none
05/01/20
Kane McHenry Cook & De Kalb Zero Cpn
484080MB9
AA3
local
157,328.00
157,328.00
200,000.00
192,362.00
maturity
07/16/12
none
12/01/18
Moorhead MN
6161412R7
AA3
local
108,820.00
108,820.00
100,000.00
3.800%
101,658.00
semi-annual
11/14/11
none
02/01/20
Davenport Iowa _
Whitewater Wis
238388GS5
AA3_
local
111,948.00
111,948.00
100,000.00
4.650%
100,972.00
semi-annual
09/13/11
none
06/01/20
966204KA6
AA3
local
109,541.00
109,541.00
100,000.00
4.850%
109,257.00
semi-annual
06/09/11
none
12/01/20
Saint Louis Park MN
791740WC3
AAA
local
112,114.00
112,114.00
100,000.00
3.850%1
102,357.00
semi-annual
12/22/11
none
02/01/18
Bandera TX ISD
059851HR9
AAA
local
154,890.00
154,890.00
150,000.00
4.000%
154,647.00
semi-annual
12/22/16
none
02/15/18
Brownsville TX ISD Zero Coupon
116421E46
AAA
local
229,640.00
229,640.00
250,000.00
244,485.00
maturity
06/26113
none
08/15/18
Minnetonka MN ISD #276
604195RA7
696497TR7
AAA
AAA
local
37,433.20
37,433.20
35,000.00
3.100%
35,806.05
semi-annual
12/22/11
none
02/01/19
Palm Beach Cnty FLA _
local
256,504.60
256,504.60
220,000.00
5.898%
232,190.20
semi-annual
07/06/11
none
06/01/19
Tenn Val Auth Cpn Stdp Zero Cpn
88059EWZ3
AAA
local
262,890.00
262,890.00
300,000.00
286,740.00
maturity
12/27/13
none
06/15/19
Norwalk Conn
668844DS9
AAA
local
122,464.80
122,464.80
120,000.00
4.050%
124,411.20
semi-annual
08/04/10
08/01/11
08/01/19
Greensboro NC
395460V21
AAA
local
366,832.80
366,832.80
360,000.00
3.263%
372,218.40
semi-annual
07/15/11
none
10/01/19
Description
Cusip
Number
Credit
Rating/F
DIC #
Type
Purchase
Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
Date
Acquired
12/22/16
Coupon
Date
Maturity/
Due Date
Saint Paul MN Port Auth
793028WS6
AAA
local
201,806.00
201,806.00
200,000.00
2.000%
201,858.00
semi-annual
08/01117
02/01/20
Woodbury MN
97913PCQ7
AAA
local
123,037.35
123,037.35
115,000.00
3.250%
117,140.15
semi-annual
12/22/11
none
02/01/20
Dallas TX Indpt Sch Dist
235308QK2
AAA
local
116,900.00
116,900.00
100,000.00
4.450%
108,216.00
semi-annual
04/16/12
08/15111
02/15/20
Tenn Valley Auth Zero Cpn
88059EHD9
AAA
local
263,970.00
263,970.00
300,000.00
281,586.00
maturity
03/11/13
none
05/01/20
Tenn Val Auth Cpn Strip Zero Cpn
88059EMX9
AAA
local
88,133.00
88,133.00
100,000.00
1 92,712.00
maturity
03/18/13
none
07/15/20
McAllen TX Dev Corp
579086AW9
AAA
local
175,000.00
175,000.00
175,000.00
1.400%
171,533.25
semi-annual
07/26/16
02/15/17
08/15/20
Baltimore Cnty MD
05914FME7
AAA
local
local
51,290.00
100,000.00
51,290.00
100,000.00
50,000.00
2.097%
49,791.50
semi-annual
08/31/16
none
08/01/21
New York St Mtge Agy
64988RHGO
AAA
100,000.00
2.375%
99,124.00
semi-annual
10/27/15
04/01116
10/01/21
Columbus OH
199492CS6
AAA
local
39,956.40
39,956.40
40,000.00
2.133%
39,776.80
semi-annual
02/20/15
none
12/01/21
Washington State
939758DL9
AA
state
205,804.00
205,804.00
200,000.00
4.500%
207,198.00
semi-annual
01/24/12
04/01112
10/01/18
Massachusetts State
57582P2T6
AA1
state
199,744.00
199,744.00
200,000.00
2.090%
201,148.00
semi-annual
12/17/14
11/01/14
05/01/20
New Hampshire St Hsg
64469DWV9
AA2
state
120,715.20
120,715.20
120,000.00
1.939%
120,583.20
semi-annual
12/09/15
07/01/16
07/01/18
Kansas St Dev Fin Auth
485429X90
_
AA3
state
182,743.20
182,743.20
180,000.00
1.877%
180,360.00
semi-annual
07/12/16
none
04/15/18
Florida St Hurricane
34074GDH4
AA3
state
279,439.80
279,439.80
270,000.00
2.995%
277,476.30
semi-annual
11/10/15
07/01/13
07/01/20
Minnesota St Colleges&Univ
60414FPJ3
AA3
state
100,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
2.000%
99,700.00
semi-annual
02/26/15
10/01/15
10/01/20
Connecticut State
20772JQN5
AA3
state
214,954.00
214,954.00
200,000.00
3.517%
210,472.00
semi-annual
05/27116
02/15/14
08/15/21
Georgia State
373384RQ1
AAA
state
26,742.50
26,742.50
25,000.00
2.970%
25,640.00
semi-annual
02/08112
none
10/01/18
Texas State
882722,151
AAA
state
103,089.00
103,089.00
100,000.00
2.894%
102,476.00
semi-annual
08/10111
04/01/12
10/01/18
Tennessee State
880541003
AAA
state
48,218.85
48,218.85
45,000.00
3.178%
46,816.65
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
08/30116
02/07112
05/25116
07130/12
02101/12
none
04113116
01/30113
08/01/20
06/01/21
04113/18
07/30/18
Virginia State
928109XD4
AAA
state
22,126.00
22,126.00
20,000.00
4.100%
20,952.00
Fed Farre Credit Bank
3133EFJMO
3134G3ZK9
31331Y4S6
3136GOY70
3133EC5NO
3134G96U6
AAA
US
249,750.00
249,750.00
250,000.00
0.930%
249,695.00
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Med Term Note
Fed Farm Credit Bank
Fed Natl Mtg Assn
Fed Farm Credit Bank
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Med Term Note_ _
RFCSP Strip Principal Zero Coupon
AAA_
AAA
AAA
AAA
AAA _
_US
US
US
US
200,000.00
114,000.00
199,300.00
99,587.00
200,000.00
114,000.00
199,300.00
99,587.00
200,000.00
200,000.00
1.200%
200,140.00
105,718.00
199,390.00
99,474.00
197,524.00
100,000.00
200,000.00
100,000.00
200,000.00
200,000.00
5.050%
1.080%
09/11/13
none
08/01/18
10/30/12
01/30/13
01/30/19
1.250%
semi-annual
01/07/13
03/04/13
03/04/19
US
200,000.00
1.050%
quarterly
08/23/16
11/23/16
08/23/19
76116FAA5 _
AAA
US
185,568.00
185,568.00
199,600.00
191,652.00
maturity
07/22/15
none
10/15/19
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EGBKO
_
AAA
US
199,600.00
200,000.00
1.300%
197,180.00
semi-annual
05/25116
11125116
11/25/19
Fed Home Ln Mlg Carp Zero Cpn
31340OBV4
AAA
US
950,527.00
950,527.00
1,000,000.00
945,790.00
maturity
11/02/15
none
11/29/19
Fed Nag Mtg Assn
3136G4KL6
AAA
US
200,000.00
200,000.00
200,000.00
1.700%
200,002.00
semi-annual
12/30116
06/30117
12/30/19
Fed Home Ln Bank
313OA3XL3
AAA_
US
99,500.00
99,500.00
100,000.00
1.500%
100,002.00
semi-annual
07/22/15
08/10115
02/10/20
_
Fed Nab Mtg Assn
3136G4JM6
AAA
US
200,000.00
200,000.00
200,000.00
1.850%
198,262.00
semi-annual
12/28/16
06128117
12/28/20
Fed Nall Mtg Assn Remic
31393EAL3
US
204,187.50
3,039.98
2,977.62
4.500%
3,025.59
monthly
07/30/03
none
08/25/18
FICO Strip Cpn Zero Coupon
31771 EAA9
US
529,947.00
529,947.00
550,000.00
540,980.00
maturity
06/09/14
none
05/11/18
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp
31393VMQI
US
153,656.25
1,862.68
1,818.36
4.500%1
1,846.14
monthly
05/30/03
06/15/18
FICO Strip Cpn13 Zero Coupon
31771C2G9
US
93,140.00
93,140.00
100,000.00
97,550.00
maturity
12/29/14
none
12/27/18
FICO Strip Cpn Zero Coupon
31358BAA6
US
94,480.00
94,480.00
100,000.00
97,153.00
maturity
04/17/15
none
02/01/19
16,732,610.19
Kaufman TX
486206KR5
A3
local
61,821.00
61,821.00
60,000.00
3.000%
60,119.40
semi-annual
06/28/16
02/15/17
02/15/23
Chaska MN
161663653
AA
Taal
115,122.70
115,122.70
110,000.00
4.000%
113,220.80
semi-annual
09/08/14
none
02/01/24
Mitchell SD Sch Dist#17-2
606687EHO
AA
local
116,702.00
116,702.00
100,000.00
6.000%
107,259.00
semi-annual
12/20/11
06/15119
06/15/24
Minnetrista MN
604229K,12
AA-
local
40,000.00
40,000.00
40,000.00
3.850%1
40,044.00
semi-annual
10/10/13
08/01114
02/01/23
7,503,732.50 local
1,492,822.15 state
3,625,383.73 US
1- 5 Years
Description
Cusip
Number
Credit
Rating/F
DIC #
Type
Purchase
Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
Interest Paid
Date
Acquired
Coupon
Date
Maturity)
Due Date
Savage Minn
80465PAN4
AA+
AA+
local
local
198,018.00
103,933.00
198,018.00
200,000.00
4.800%
205,850.00
103,883.00
semi-annual
semi-annual
06/17/10
05/11/11
02/01/11
02/01/24
02/01/25
Lake City Minn ISD #813
508084DW7
103,933.00
100,000.00
5.000%
none
Minneapolis MN
60374YG68
AA1
local
110,419.00
110,419.00
100,000.00
4.700%
105,569.00
semi-annual
10/31/11
none
03/01/23
Minneapolis MN
60374YG76
AA1
local
72,201.35
72,201.35
65,000.00
4.800%
68,497.00
semi-annual
12/09/14
none
03/01/24
Alexandria MN ISD#206
015131LQ6
AA2
local
279,760.50
279,760.50
270,000.00
3.000%
277,665.30
semi-annual
01/21/15
none
02/01/23
Duluth MN
264438ZL9
AA2
local
29,767.20
29,767.20
30,000.00
2.625%
28,712.10
semi-annual
12/05/12
08/01/13
02101/25
W Palm Beach FL
955116BE7
AA3
local
101,245.00
101,245.00
100,000.00
2.264%
97,747.00
semi-annual
07/05/16
10/01/16
10101/22
Hawkins Cnty TN
420218PL7
AA3
local
111,480.00
111,480.00
100,000.00
4.800%
103,120.00
semi-annual
03/13/12
none
05/01/24
Tennessee Valley Auth Ser E
880591CJ9
AAA
local
121,500.00
121,500.00
100,000.00
6.750%
130,350.00
semi-annual
03/19/09
none
11/01/25
Ice Deposit- National Sports Center
none
local
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
maturity
02/06/08
none
01/01/26
Florida St Dept Environmental
3416OWUAO
AA3
stale
217,800.00
217,800.00
200,000.00
6.206%
219,248.00
semi-annual
08/30/10
07101/10
07/01/22
Georgia State
373384208
AAA
state
204,444.00
204,444.00
200,000.00
2.780%
204,220.00
semi-annual
12/13/16
none
02/01/23
2,115,504.60
Itasca County Minn
465452GP9
A
local
105,024.00
105,024.00
100,000.00
5.550%1
103,772.00
semi-annual
07/12/11
none
02/01/28
Milaca Minn ISD #912
598699NT9
AA+
local
106,941.00
106,941.00100,000
.00
5.650°�
106,674.00
semi-annual
07/22/11
none
02/01/27
Van Buren Mich Public Schools
920729HD5
Wlocal
102,750.00
102,750.00
100,000.00
6.430%
108,656.00
semi-annual
07/17/09
11/01/09
05/01/29
Will County IL Cmnty Zero Coupon
969078QM9
AA2
local
159,000.00
159,000.00
500,000.00
297,140.00
maturity
semi-annual
08/25/09
02126/10
none
none
11/01/27
04121/28
Fed Farm Credit Bank
31331VLC8
AAA
US
106,030.45
106,030.45
100,000.005.2500/
121,553.00
737,795.00
33,738,966.75
1,692,036.60 local
423,468.00 state
6 -10 Years
616,242.00 local
121,553.00 US
10+ Years
INVESTMENT SCHEDULE - Money Market Funds
January 31, 2017
Description
Current Market
Value
YTD Interest
Wells Fargo
I Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund
1 $428,364.311
$134.13
4M
1 4M
1,895.36
0.62
4M PLUS
I 4M Plus
3,108.721
1.17
Premier Bank
I jPremier Bank Money Market
260,868.61
55.38
Grand Total Money Market Funds 1 $694,237.00 1$I9L30
Updated. 2/17/2017