HomeMy WebLinkAboutWK - January 24, 2017ME NOmk - _
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNLSOIA 55304
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
City Council Workshop
Tuesday, January 24, 2017
Conference Rooms A & B
Call to Order — 6:00 p.m.
2. Joint Meeting with Park & Recreation Commission
(763)755-5100
A. Review Draft Plan/14-15/Fox Meadows Park — Engineering
B. Update of the Park Comprehensive Plan — Engineering
C. Discuss 2018-2022 CIP for Parks and the Future of the City Park System —
Engineering
D. Discuss Park Maintenance Needs — Engineering
E. Discuss the Future of the Open Space Properties — Engineering
F. Discuss Community -Wide Survey — Engineering
Approve Tree Clearing Quotes/16-40, Smith's Green Acres Ditch Cleaning & 17-18, South
Access to Woodland Creek Wetland Restoration—Engineering
4. Update on Hanson Boulevard NW Reconstruction from Jay St. NW to Crosstown Blvd.
NW/15-16/ — Engineering
Community Survey Discussion—Administration
6. 2016 Budget Progress Reports -Administration
7. December 2016 City Investments Review -Administration
Other Business
9. Adjournment
aa.
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Council Members
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public—Works / City Engineer
Review Draft Plan/14-15/Fox Meadows Park - Engineering
January 24, 2017
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is requested to review the draft plan options for Project 14-15, Fox Meadows Park.
DISCUSSION
There are 3 options attached for your review and consideration. Notice in each option the large field on
the south side of the park moves north and west. The main cost difference between the options is the
dirt work. This will be discussed along with the layout in detail at the meeting.
ACTION REQUIRED
Staff is requesting City Council direction on which option should be utilized for the final design.
Respectfully submitted,
(-ZLVQ� .
David D. Berkowitz
Attach: Fox Meadows Park Reconstruction layout options along with cost estimates for each
Cc: John and Rita Burgeson, 4345 157`h Ave. NW
Notes:
1. For connections to existing streets.
2. Fertilizer analysis 20-10-10 applied at 200 lbs per acre.
3. Includes application of disc anchored mulch Type 1 applied at 2 tons / acre in areas not being blanketed.
4. Application rates for Seed Mix: 25-121 = 100 lbs/acre. Include 20 lbs per acre of annual rye mix.
5. Grass trail grading not included in cost estimate.
Fox Meadows Park Reconstruction - City Project 14-15
Preliminary Estimate - Option #1
TOTAL ESTIMATED
PROJECT QUANTITIES
NOTES
ITEM NO.
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
EST.
QUAN.
UNIT
PRICE
AMOUNT
1
2021.501
Mobilization
LS
1
$
8,000.00
$
8,000.00
2
2104.505
Remove Bituminous Pavement
SY
17
$
10.00
$
170.00
3
Remove Concrete Pavement
BY
75
$
10.00
$
750.00
1
4
2104.513
Sawing Bit Pavement Full Depth)
LF
75
$
6.00
$
450.00
5
Clear & Grub Trees
AC
1.7
$
5,000.00
$
8,500.00
6
Remove & Dispose Ex. Park Shelter
LS
1
$
1,500.00
$
1,500.00
7
2105.501
Common Excavation EV
CY
12 611
$
8.00
$
100 888.00
8
2112.501
Sub rade Pre aration - Parking Lot
SY
3 410
$
0.60
$
2,046.00
5
9
Sub rade Preparation -Trail
SY
470
$
0.75
$
352.50
10
2211.501
Aggregage Base Class 5 - Parking Lot
TON
1,140
$
20.00
$
22 800.00
11
2211.501
Aggregage Base Class 5 - Trail
TON
130
$
22.00
$
2,860.00
12
2360.501
Type SP 9.5 Wearing Course Mix (2,B) -Trail and Driveway
Aro TN
100
$
90.00
$
9,000.00
13
2521.618
6" Concrete Walk Ped. ramp and sidewalk to BB court
SF
125
$
7.00
$
875.00
14
2531.618
Truncated Domes
SF
16
$
42.00
$
672.00
15
2563.601
Traffic Control
LS
1
$
500.00
$
500.00
16
2573.502
Silt Fence
LF
1900
$
1.80
$
3420.00
17
2573.602
Tem ora Rock Construction Entrance
EA
1
$
500.00
$
500.00
18
Topsoil Remediation CV
LS
1
$
25 000.00
$
25 000.00
19
2574.525
Topsoil Borrow L
CY
870
$
18.00
$
15660.00
2
20
2574.508
Fertilizer Type 1
LB
325
$
2.00
$
650.00
4
21
2575.502
Seed Mixture Type 25-121
LB
165
$
9.00
$
1,485.00
22
2575.523
Erosion Control Blanket Category 3 Jute Netting)
SY
4,500
$
2.75
1 $
12 375.00
3
23
2575.604
Seeding
AC
1.7
$
1 300.00
$
2 210.00
24
Pro Turf Seed Fertilizer, and H dromulch
AC
3.6
$
2 000.00
$
7 200.00
25
Irrigation Well
LS
1
$
220 000.00
$
220 000.00
26
Irri ation System for fields
LS
1
$
30,000.00
$
30,000.00
Subtotal
$
477,863.50
27
Construct Park Shelter
LS
1.0
$
30,000.00
$
30,000.00
Total
$
507,863.50
Notes:
1. For connections to existing streets.
2. Fertilizer analysis 20-10-10 applied at 200 lbs per acre.
3. Includes application of disc anchored mulch Type 1 applied at 2 tons / acre in areas not being blanketed.
4. Application rates for Seed Mix: 25-121 = 100 lbs/acre. Include 20 lbs per acre of annual rye mix.
5. Grass trail grading not included in cost estimate.
Page 1 of 1 ;
Cut/Fill Report
Generated: 2017-01-09 10:07:47
By user: jakek
H:\Engineering\City Projects\Open City Projects\14-15 Fox Meadows Park
Drawing: Redevelopment\Drafting\H:\Engineering\City Projects\Open City Projects\14-15 Fox Meadows Park
Redevelopment\Drafting\14-15 Fox Meadows Field Option 1 010917.dwg
Volume Summary
Name
Type
Cut
Fill Factor
2d Area
Cut
Fill
Net
4813.00
2011.45<Cuty
Factor
(Sq. Ft.)
(Cu. Yd.)
(Cu. Yd.)
(Cu. Yd.)
Surface
full
1.000
1.000
278441.42
6824.45
4813.00
2011.45<Cuty
Field I 1
Totals
2d Area
(Sq. Ft.)
Cut
(Cu. Yd.)
Fill
(Cu. Yd.)
Net
(Cu. Yd.)
Total
278441.42
6824.45
4813.00
2011.45<Cuty
* Value adjusted by cut or fill factor other than 1.0
Ell
•36W
/
B9�J
U10 \b10
0
I
B FULL 9
0 100 200' I 9 Fl
11
NOTE:
•
1. THE EXACT LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SUCH AS GAS, TELEPHONE, FIBER OPTIC,
•
•
ELECTRIC, CABLE TV, AND PIPE LINES ARE UNKNONN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT
g B
/�
I
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (651-45h0002) BEFORE COMMENCING EXCAVATION.
8
0a
2 THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS
UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDEUNES OF CI/ASCE 38-02,
0
ENTITLED 'STANDARD GUIDEUNES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE
'�
UTUTY DATA'. I
EXISTING FENCE 4' GATE PROPERTY µINE
'I'
16' GTE
3. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM AND BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE
'MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES- (MN MUTCD) AND PART M.
'FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS.'
YLJJL C11K
IM NIW YN9L I NFPtBI O]Try INTNNI 1M3 PMYIRtD Bl YE Q1110FT1 Yf �!
ARfTNNS1WW AV] IMA PA%E49CINL fllilfFA VIDET TE
�
C I T Y O F
D 0 VE R
FOX MEADOWS PARK REDEVELOPMENT
CITY PROJECT 14-15
PROJECT LAYOUT—FIELD OPTION 1
PROPOSED
3,E
„m 4 = ft
SHEEP N0. X OF XX SHEETS
aF ossDl�m w DDB
16001
�'.,.;'(•$���
� ,
�
/ e
e I I i
"Y06I
GRGUND% •�
bB
mm
® I
COURT
ae cgs `O
3 m �
A
a
I
9
0 100' 200' •
I 9
s
1. NOTME EXACT LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SUCH AS GAS, TELEPHONE, FIBER OPTIC, ® • •
ELECTRIC, CABLE W. AND PIPE LINES ARE UNKNOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 89 111 9 • a�
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (651-454-0002) BEFORE COMMENCING EXCAVATION.
a�
2. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTIUTY OUAUTY LEVEL D. THIS
UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CUASCE 38-02, 9 0�
ENTITLED 'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE
UTIUTY DATA'. tS'
3. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL E%ISTING FENCE 4' GATE PROPERLY LINE 16 GATE CONFORM AND BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE !O
'MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DENCES' (MN MUTCD) AND PART M.
'FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS.' 4.3455
D®]m DMEN I HAW/ DTDi! iMM lll4 PINI Etl ALLPIIVD B! YE al HEIR YY DWIT
4RFR.19CN IND 11NT I NI /� GILY Y`3]@D MCiEb.YYY d�1D]I 11l'Flt 11E
JJL JAK INYS DF TIE SfgE a YNEIDw C I T Y O F
I A I DOVER FOX MEADOWS PARK REDEVELOPMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS
xo. I>wTE n IfESDNPIION a IEvmors ooe IX: o aeTsr wiR�' CITY PROJECT 14-15 SHEET N0. X OF XX SHEETS
1
I �l pklSnN
I i uO \\ �AYGRONND !T *��/ •
o �
� oo TING
B oulk
m
X/ST \ �
R
NEI.
y 9 \ DO
Im
• w,/ \ \ \
I sa c
m
m' U1O I h1O
I \
\p �
m $ FULL 9 \ \
Fl \
0 100' 200'
I \
m \
9
NOTE: qlr •
1. THE EXACT LE TV, NOF UNDERGROUND UTIUOW SUCH AS GAS, TELEPHONE, CFIBERONT OPTIC,
ELECTRIC, CABLE N, AND PIPE UNE- ARE UNKNOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT
GOPHER UBSU ONE CALL UTILITY(851-�54-00INFORMATIO 2) BTHIS COMMENCING E%QUALITY N.
2. THE SUBSURFACE LWASETERMATDN IN RDI PLAN IS GUIDE QUALITY LEVEL D.E THIS a B
ENTITLED
DUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE DEPICTION
NES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, 0�
UTILITY
'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE 'I
3. ALL DATA'. I '� EXISTING FENCE 4' GATE PROPERTY µINE 16' GATE
" ALL "MINNESOTA
CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM AND BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE M. THE
'MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM RAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES' (MN MUTCD) AND PART N,
'FEW MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS.'
�R91IE0 PWM1 I IE161! P3RfY TW 116 A/N BS MP/RID 6IE PI UlRFA W NRdT
51iNIN9p NO TMT I NI A PRY IICQ® iRJRIDNML NBR MlFll TEPROJECT LAYOUT -FIELD
JJL UAX w9aFncsudEaMM1F3OP CITY 0 F FOX MEADOWS PARK REDEVELOPMENT EXISTING AND PROPOSED OPTION 1
O6� �AwP DOVER CITY PROJECT 14-15
nae a oRxurraN a Bvmoxs -Oe P� a�rrn4 = Ym6 SHEET NO. X OF XX SHEETS
Notes:
1. For connections to existing streets.
2. Fertilizer analysis 20-10-10 applied at 200 lbs per acre.
3. Includes application of disc anchored mulch Type 1 applied at 2 tons / acre in areas not being blanketed.
4. Application rates for Seed Mix: 25-121 = 100 lbs/acre. Include 20 lbs per acre of annual rye mix.
5. Grass trail grading not included in cost estimate.
Fox Meadows Park Reconstruction - City Project 14-15
Preliminary Estimate - Option #2
TOTAL ESTIMATED
PROJECT QUANTITIES
NOTES
ITEM NO.
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
EST.
QUAN.
UNIT
PRICE
AMOUNT
1
2021.501
Mobilization
LS
1
$
8,000.00
$
8,000.00
2
2104.505
Remove Bituminous Pavement
SY
17
$
10.00
$
170.00
3
Remove Concrete Pavement
SY
75
$
10.00
$
750.00
1
4
2104.513
Sawing Bit Pavement Full Depth)
LF
75
$
6.00
$
450.00
5
Clear & Grub Trees
AC
1.6
$
5,000.00
$
8,000.00
6
Remove & Dispose Ex. Park Shelter
LS
1
$
1,500.00
$
1,500.00
7
2105.501
Common Excavation E
14 436
$
6.00
$
86 616.00
8
2112.501
Sub rade Preparation - Parkin Lot
BY
3.410
$
0.60
$
2046.00
5
9
Sub rade Preparation -Trail
470
$
0.75
$
352.50
10
2211.501
A re a e Base Class 5 -Parkin Lot
KTN
1 140
$
20.00
$
22 800.00
11
2211.501
A re a e Base Class 5 -Trail
130
$
22.00
$
2,860.00
12
2360.501
Type SP 9.5 WearingCourse Mix 2,6 -Trail and DrivewayAro
100
$
90.00
$
9,000.00
13
2521.618
&' Concrete Walk Ped. ram and sidewalk to BB court
125
$
7.00
$
875.00
14
2531.618
Truncated Domes
16
$
42.00
$
672.00
15
2563.601
Traffic Control
LS
1
$
500.00
$
500.00
16
2573.502
Silt Fence
LF
1,600
$
1.80
$
2,880.00
17
2573.602
Temporary Rock Construction Entrance
EA
1
$
500.00
$
500.00
18
Topsoil Remediation C
LS
1
$
25 000.00
$
25 000.00
19
2574.525
Topsoil Borrow L
CY
870
$
18.00
$
15 660.00
2
20
2574.508
Fertilizer Type 1
LB
325
$
2.00
$
650.00
4
21
2575.502
Seed Mixture, Type 25-121
LB
165
- $
9.00
$
148500
22
2575.523
Erosion Control Blanket, Category 3 Jute Netting)
SY
4,501
$
2.75
$
12,375.00
3
23
2575.604
SeedingAC
1.7
$
1300.00
$
2,210.00
24
Pro Turf Seed, Fertilizer, and H dromulch
AC
3.6
$
2,000.00
$
7,200.00
25
Irrigation Well
LS
i$
220,000.00
$
220,000.00
26
Irrigation System for Fields
LS
1
$
30,000.00
$
30,000.00
Subtotal
$
462,551.50
27
Construct Park Shelter
LS
1.0
$
30,000.00
$
30,000.00
Total
$
492,551.50
Notes:
1. For connections to existing streets.
2. Fertilizer analysis 20-10-10 applied at 200 lbs per acre.
3. Includes application of disc anchored mulch Type 1 applied at 2 tons / acre in areas not being blanketed.
4. Application rates for Seed Mix: 25-121 = 100 lbs/acre. Include 20 lbs per acre of annual rye mix.
5. Grass trail grading not included in cost estimate.
Page 1 of 1
Cut/Fill Report
Generated: 2017-01-09 13:33:25
By user: jakek
H:\Engineering\City Projects\Open City Projects\14-15 Fox Meadows Park
Drawing: Redevelopment\Draffing\H:\Engineering\City Projects\Open City Projects\14-15 Fox Meadows Park
Redevelopment\Drafting\14-15 Fox Meadows Field Option 2 010917.dwg
Volume Summary
Name
Type
Cut
Fill Factor
2d Area
Cut
Fill
Net
3870.99
4775.15<Ctit>
Factor
(Sq. Ft.)
(Cu. Yd.)
(Cu. Yd.)
(Cu. Yd.)
SRF-FGI-
VOLUME
full
1.000
1.000
263400.82
8646.14
3870.99
4775.15<Cut>
1
Totals
2d Area
(Sq. Ft.)
Cut
(Cu. Yd.)
Fill
(Cu. Yd.)
Net
(Cu. Yd.)
Total
263400.82
8646.14
3870.99
4775.15<Ctit>
* Value adjusted by cut or fill factor other than 1.0
0 100' 200'
U10 /51 I
3 I
//,
t_m
ruL SZE
0
U10
>r1 �ynNG
D "k� GROUND
NOTE:
#Rf
1. THE ACT LE OF UNDARE U1KNO SUCH AS GAS, TELEPHONE, OPTC,
.
C, TV, A PE LINES
ELECTRIC, CABLE N, AND PIPE LINES ARE UNKNOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT
CONT
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 2) BEFORE COMMENCING IXUAUTON.
'TMS
2. TIE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFOR ATO
RMINEDN IN THIS PLAN IS DUALITY LEVEL D.E THIS
LWASDETERMINED
DUSTIN LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES
GUIDE CI/ASCE 38-04,
6�
ENTITLED
ENTTFD ASTANDARO GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTNC SUBSURFACE
E
BILIN DATA". I
' EXISTING FENCE 4' GATE PROPERTY LINE
16' GTE
ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEFORM SHALL CONFORM AND BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE THE
'MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM CONTROL DEVICES' (MN MUTCD) AND PART F,
: M.
AFFIL
'FlEID MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS."
d9101m OANIIt
JJL .wc
Q6�
DDB
I IEPFBI ffAINY TNT Tl4 NM TA4 MDIITD BY YE M YITf11 W OIRfT.I
btRFRYH]N MD TNT I NI /� WLY IlCplgp gpiFF8900tNY. FHSETt UEfl1 TE
us TC avuE ^F NNTHIIA
�w0.8�
,TAT IRRTITT'If�
oac a� 4 nz:z
I T Y 0 F
NDOVER
FOX MEADOWS PARK REDEVELOPMENT
CITY PROJECT 14-15
ROLAYOUT—FIELD OPTION 2
PROPOSED
V.i
SHEET N0. X OF XX SHEETS
IIESCNPIITN a REVma15
Wm
CDU
I m
a
�I
68
C
y
x
uta I3
Ula
m
� 3
tDAL
p
m
\
4b
\
0 100' 200'
Bs
B
s
NOTE:
1. THE EXACT LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SUCH AS GAS, TELEPHONE. FIBER OPTIC.
ELECTRIC, CAN, AND PIPE UNES ARE UNKNOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT
0N�
GOPHER STATEE ONE CALL (651-454-0002) BEFORE COMMENCING EXCAVATION.
2. THE SUBSURFACE INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY DUALITY LEVEL THIS
UTILITY DUALITY LEVELL WAS WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCEE 36-02,
ENTITLED 'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE
UTILITY DATA'.
I
EXISTINGFENCE
4� GATE
PROPERTY
LINE
16� GTE
3. ALL TRAFLTC CONTROL DENCES SHALL CONFORM AND BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE
'MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES' (MN MUTCD) AND PART V.
'FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS'
MNa
I
�^^^n TMA YU"°° °" �" "°'°�
«' "Y "`' I�"a9""""'m` "°'" "`
C I T Y 0 F
PROJECT LAYOUT—FIELD OPTION 2
JJL ,wc
FOX MEADOWS PARK REDEVELOPMENT
EXISTING AND PROPOSED
a
mom.—
DOVER
CITY PROJECT 14-15
SHEET NO. X OF XX SHEETS
xa wTE n oEscwrlwx a Rwmals
DDB
nae armAml4 ue xn aam
Notes:
1. For connections to existing streets.
2. Fertilizer analysis 20-10-10 applied at 200 lbs per acre.
3. Includes application of disc anchored mulch Type 1 applied at 2 tons / acre in areas not being blanketed.
4. Application rates for Seed Mix: 25-121 = 100 lbs/acre. Include 20 lbs per acre of annual rye mix.
5. Grass trail grading not included in cost estimate.
Fox Meadows Park Reconstruction - City Project 14-15
Preliminary Estimate - Option #3
TOTAL ESTIMATED
PROJECT QUANTITIES
NOTES
ITEM NO.
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
EST.
QUAN.
UNIT
PRICE
AMOUNT
1
2021.501
Mobilization
LS
1
$
8,000.00
$
8,000.00
2
2104.505
Remove Bituminous Pavement
BY
17
$
10.00
$
170.00
3
Remove Concrete Pavement
BY
75
$
10.00
$
750.00
1
4
2104.513
Sawing Bit Pavement Full Depth)
LF
75
$
6.00
$
450.00
5
Clear & Grub Trees
AC
1.8
$
5,000.00
$
9,000.00
6
Remove & Dispose Ex. Park Shelter
LS
1
$
1,500.00
$
1,500.00
7
2105.501
Common Excavation EV
CY
9,894
$
12.00
$
118 728.00
8
Granular Borrow
CY
2,502
$
15.00
$
37 530.00
9
1 2112.501
Sub rade Preparation - Parking Lot
SY
3,410
$
0.60
$
2,046.00
5
10
Sub rade Preparation - Trail
BY
435
$
0.75
$
326.25
11
2211.501
Aggregage Base Class 5 - Parking Lot
TON
1,140
$
20.00
$
22 800.00
12
2211.501
Aggregage Base Class 5 - Trail
TON
116
$
22.00
$
2 552.00
13
2360.501
Type SP 9.5 Wearing Course Mix (2,B) -Trail and Drivewa
Aro TN
95
$
90.00
$
8,550.00
14
2521.618
6" Concrete Walk Ped. ramp and sidewalk to BB court
SF
125
$
7.00
$
875.00
15
2531.618
Truncated Domes
SF
16
$
42.00
$
672.00
16
2563.601
Traffic Control
LS
1
$
500.00
$
500.00
17
2573.502
Silt Fence
LF
1200
$
1.80
$
21160.00
18
2573.602
Temporary Rock Construction Entrance
EA
1
$
500.00
$
500.00
19
Topsoil Remediation CV
LS
1
$
25 000.00
$
25 000.00
20
2574.525
Topsoil Borrow LV
CY
870
$
18.00
$
15 660.00
2
21
2574.508
Fertilizer, Type 1
LB
325
$
2.00
$
650.00
4
22
2575.502
Seed Mixture Type 25-121
LB
165
$
9.00
$
1,485.00
23
2575.523
Erosion Control Blanket Category 3 Jute Netting)
BY
4 500
$
2.75
$
12 375.00
3
24
2575.604
Seeding
AC
1.7
$
1,300.00
$
2 210.00
25
Pro Turf Seed Fertilizer, and H dromulch
AC
3.6
$
2,000.00
$
7,200.00
26
Irrigation Well
LS
1
$ 220,000.00
$
220,000.00
27
Irrigation System for Fields
LS
1
$
30,000.00
$
30,000.00
Subtotal
$
531,689.25
28
1
IConstruct Park Shelter
LS
1.0
$
30,000.00
$
30,000.00
Total
$
561,689.25
Notes:
1. For connections to existing streets.
2. Fertilizer analysis 20-10-10 applied at 200 lbs per acre.
3. Includes application of disc anchored mulch Type 1 applied at 2 tons / acre in areas not being blanketed.
4. Application rates for Seed Mix: 25-121 = 100 lbs/acre. Include 20 lbs per acre of annual rye mix.
5. Grass trail grading not included in cost estimate.
Page 1 of 1
Cut/Fill Report
Generated: 2017-01-06 13:19:37
By user: jakek
H:\Engineering\City Projects\Open City Projects\14-15 Fox Meadows Park
Drawing: Redevelopment\Drafting\H:\Engineering\City Projects\Open City Projects\14-15 Fox Meadows Park
Redevelopment\Drafting\14-15 Fox Meadows base 010617.dwg
Volume Summary
Name
Type
Cut
Fill Factor
2d Area
Cut
Fill
Net
6609.48
2501.84<Fill>
Factor
(Sq. Ft.)
(Cu. Yd.)
(Cu. Yd.)
(Cu. Yd.)
Surface eg
fg
combined
full
1.000
1.000
254590.78
4107.64
6609.48
2501.84<Fill>
1
Totals
2d Area
(Sq. Ft.)
Cut
(Cu. Yd.)
Fill
(Cu. Yd.)
Net
(Cu. Yd.)
Total
254590.78
4107.64
6609.48
2501.84<Fill>
* Value adjusted by cut or fill factor other than 1.0
D
f
I.
. 2
m
1 um
m
A
o
PULL
SIZE
FIELD
m
I 9
0 100' 200'
a
N
B
m
NOTE:
m
Y�
1. THE EXACT LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTUTIES SUCH AS GAS. TELEPHONE. FIBER OPTIC,
ELECTRIC, CABLE TV, AND PIPE UNE- ARE UNKNOWN. TIME
•
•
•
SHALL CONTACT
GOPHER -TALE ONE CALL 2) BEFORE COMMENCING EXCAVATION.
GING EXCAVATION.
9
9
ga
2. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY
Y INF MATO IN THIS PLAN QUALITYOF LEVEL THIS
B
y t=ems. �
ETERMATIDN
T DUTY
Cl/ASCED.
UTILITY "STAN LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ISTSUBSURFACE
'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUB-URFACE
"�
6
UTILITY DATA. I
UTILITY
ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE- SHALL CONFORM AND BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE THE
EXISTING FENCE 4 GATE
PROPERTY LINE 16 GTE
:
'MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES' (MN MUTCD) AND PART M.
'FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS.'
CE914TED M.1N11
JJL uAK
IIWT lll4 P1.1X m5 PNPNYD W YE pl UNI W GE1.'f
MQ I NI A pRY IILAL4D AIOfl58pY1 flYY111RY11 THE
IEOFMINNI=A
C I T Y O F
PROJECT
LAYOUT -FIELD OPTION 3
°�I=ZML!DOVER
FOX MEADOWS PARK REDEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED
MB
°Aw""'"°""A
CITY PROJECT 14-15
"D• DAA W ^�^
6
SHEET
NO. X OF XX SHEETS
16001
15825
a��U
.,I
Gr'ZZ e
\ -4k
Y
g 0e I I /l/fX/STTN /1
1/k/PCAYGRpUNOl� ® •� ® s \ I
m
87
m I
G9 II
m� • II
m ® I COURT f \
3 i ae vs �3O
m
La
Im
z m
I 9 �
I � N
0 100, 200' I • `°
I � S
NOTE: ® • •
1. THE EXACT LOCATION A OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SUCH AS GAS, TELEPHONE, FIBER OPTIC, y
ELECTRIC, CABLE TV, AND PIPE LINES ARE UNKNOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 68y��.-. ''�` • 0�`
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (fiat—ORMATI02) BEFORE COMMENCING E%LAVATION. g
2. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY DETERMINED
IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY OUAUTY Cl/A D.E THIS g
UNUTY "STN LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF EXISTING
SUBSURFACE
ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE tS
UTILITY DATA EXISTING FENCE 4' GATE PROPERN LINE 16' GATE j
3. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM AND BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE O
MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES" (MN MUTCD) AND PART VI,
"FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS" 4345
JUL
MMAN I v RRIiY OT I m A WA9 PRk9.V® Bl YE pl MIDI W OFCf
asTmvvmll Wo NMT T W A dAY umissn FRaFTsaoNli INOEm MID! 1K C I T Y O F EXISTING CONDITIONS
JL JiUC IAWs OF TIE SLtlE OF MMSOM
wwumEowrz DOVER FOX MEADOWS PARK REDEVELOPMENT
w �� � DDB w� �6T CITY PROJECT 14-15 SHEET NO. X OF XX SHEETS
I
lT c lslw
it' Gg0UN0
&
,D
all
® GO M1
T / x15 \
/2 SNa
1 U10
m
FULL
N m SIZE
m
RED
m �
\ 4b
0 100, 200' s \
a
NOTE:
1. THE C CA LOCATION OF PE UNES UNDME UNKNOWN.
SUCH AS GAS, TELEPHONE, CONTACT CT
ELECTRIC, CABLE N, AND PIPE UNES ARE UNKNOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 91=v-.�� •
9 ga
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 851-454-0002) BEFORE COMMENCING EXCAVATION. E
2. THE SUBSURFACE LUTIUTYWAS INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN T DUTY OUALIOF LEVEL D.E THIS y 6
UTILITY DUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF IS ASCE 38-02,
ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE
3. ALL DATA'. I Xi IXISTING FENCE 4' GATE PROPERTY LINE 16' GTE
3. ALL TRAFFlC CONTROL UNIFORM
SHALL CONFORM AND BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE M. THE
'MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM AFIRCC CONTROL DEVICES' (MN MUTCD) AND PART VI,
'FlELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFlC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS.'
06MIm DILNM I NDlB! 4VRiY 11MT 1M6 PUN YA9 P/!➢/IM11D W IE OR IRL'F11 W ORFCf
9MANW1g1 ND 111V I NI A PILY IN'F)® PP6F8901UL f11aF01 UCfA 11E
JJL JAK Mi1S OF T1E SGIE 0i MAT'EHOfA CITY 0 F —FIELD OPTION 3
E�gj DOVER FOX MEADOWS PARK REDEVELOPMENT EXISTING AND PROPOSED
o-- DAw0.� CITY PROJECT 14-15
Ma DAA ^ Rnmo� m� ���• �.o ,�• SHEEP NO. X OF XX SHEETS
m
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Council Members
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
David D. Berkowitz, City Engineer 1r ctor of Public Works Z►b
Todd J. Haas, Assistant Public WorkH` grector/Parks Coordinator
B. Update of the Park Comprehensive Plan- Engineering
January 24, 2017
INTRODUCTION
The is an update item for the City Council regarding the Park Comprehensive Plan that is currently
being drafted by the Park and Recreation Commission.
DISCUSSION
Over the past few months the Park and Recreation has been reviewing the Parks chapter of the overall
City Comprehensive plan and has also been working on a facilities chart spreadsheet that includes
existing improvements, future improvements and the itemized replacement list. The Park and
Recreation Commission will be finalizing the facilities chart spreadsheet over the next few months.
Once the Commission is ready to make a presentation to the City Council, staff will schedule this on a
future workshop agenda later this year.
ACTION REQUIRED
No action is necessary as this update as to the status of the Park Comprehensive Plan.
Respectfully submitted,
,A///40 /
Todd J. Haas
Cc: Park and Recreation Commission
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Council Members
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator v
David D. Berkowitz, City Engine irector of Public Works
Todd J. Haas, Assistant Public Works 17nector/Parks Coordinator
C. Discuss 2018-2022 CIP for Parks and the Future of the City Park System -
Engineering
January 24, 2017
INTRODUCTION
The Park and Recreation Commission would like to discuss with the City Council the 2018-2022 CIP
for parks and the future of the City park system.
DISCUSSION
The Park and Recreation Commission would like to hear from the City Council if there are any projects
that they are interested in over the next five years and what the Council sees for the future of the City -
park system.
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to provide input regarding the 2018-2022 CIP for parks and the future of
the City park system.
Respectfully submitted,
Todd J. Haas
Cc: Park and Recreation Commission
Attachment: Current 2017-2021 CIP Park Improvements
CITY OF ANDOVER
Park Improvement Fund
Projected Fund Balance
**Target - $50,000 to create a contingency for any project overages.
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
TOTALS
Projected Sources of Revenue
Park Dedication Fee - Residential Units
50
25
25
25
25
Park Dedication Fee - Residential ($2,952/unit)
$ 365,830
$ 147,600
$ 73,800
$ 73,800
$ 73,800
$ 73,800
$ 808,630
Park Dedication Fee - Commercial
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Donation / Contribution
-
100,000
-
-
-
-
100,000
Capital Projects Levy- Park Improvements
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
90,000
Total Revenues Available
380,830
262,600
88,800
88,800
88,800
88,800
998,630
Projected Commitments
Rose Park - tower rental fee
4,635
4,635
Lions Park - irrigation
17,042
17,042
Kelsey Round Lake Park - Master Plan
9,665
9,665
Timber Trails Park - Renovation
284,000
284,000
Terrace Park - Irrigation & Water Service
35,000
35,000
Sunshine Park - Scoreboard Wiring & Design
27,000
27,000
Irrigation Project - Small
20,000
20,000
20,000
60,000
Nordeen's Park - Basketball court
7,500
7,500
Fox Meadows - Reconstruction
457,300
457,300
Pine Hills North - Phase II
Storage Building (Donations)
100,000
100,000
Parking Lot w/ Curb (30% Park Dedication)
120,000
120,000
Wild Iris Park - Irrigation & Water Service
42,500
42,500
Annual Miscellaneous Projects
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
90,000
Total Commitments
392,342
599,800
35,000
35,000
177,500
15,000
1,254,642
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(11,512)
(337,200)
53,800
53,800
(88,700)
73,800
Fund Balance as of December 31, 2015
376,632
Fund Balance Brought Forward
365,120
27,920
81,720
135,520
46,820
Ending Fund Balance **
$ 365,120
$ 27,920
$ 81,720
$ 135,520
$ 46,820
$ 120,620
**Target - $50,000 to create a contingency for any project overages.
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 . WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Council Members
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator `
David D. Berkowitz, City Engineer/D' I of Public Works
Todd J. Haas, Assistant Public Works Director/Parks Coordinator
D. Discuss Park Maintenance Needs - Engineering
January 24, 2017
INTRODUCTION
The Park and Recreation Commission has requested to discuss park maintenance needs with the City
Council.
DISCUSSION
The Park and Recreation Commission would like to discuss with the City Council the park
maintenance and replacement needs that is growing more and more each year as park improvements
are coming up on their life expectancy or are in need to be replaced. For example the City currently has
40 playground structures in the parks system. In the past the City was replacing two structures a year
with the Parks Maintenance Department installing the new playground equipment. Historically the
budget for purchasing the two structures a year had been $50,000. Most recently though over the last
couple years new playground equipment structures including the installation needed to be contracted
out at a cost of about $50,000 each.
Due to the expanding park system over the past few years and providing the maintenance that is
required to keep up with existing and new improvements, the Parks Maintenance Works Department
staff have been spending more time focusing on cutting grass, preparing fields and taking on the
normal routine items (checking garbage containers, maintaining the skate park and maintaining the
expanding irrigation system, ect.). Going forward, the Parks Maintenance Department does not have
the time to continue installing new playground equipment.
With increased prices for new playground equipment and the cost to hire a contractor to install the
equipment, the City will be only able to purchase one a structure a year starting in 2017. By purchasing
one structure a year, the City will fall behind in replacing the equipment (playground equipment is
generally being replaced about every 15-20 years).
This is just one example. There other examples in the park system that will need attention and
replacement over the next few years such as shelters, field rehab, replacement of irrigation systems, ect.
Mayor and Council Members
January 24, 2017
Page 2 of 2
ACTION REQUIRED
No action is required since this item is for discussion purposes only.
Respectfully submitted,
Todd J. Haas
Cc: Park and Recreation Commission
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Jim Dickinson, City Adm
David D. Berkowitz, City
55304 • (763) 755-5100
GOV
of Public Works 30t!>
Todd J. Haas, Assistant Public Works Director/Parks Coordinator
E. Discuss the Future of the Open Space Properties - Engineering
January 24, 2017
a�.
INTRODUCTION
The Park and Recreation Commission has requested to discuss the future of the Open Space properties
that currently exists throughout the City with the City Council.
DISCUSSION
The Park and Recreation Commission would like to discuss their thoughts with the City Council about
how residents are viewing the Open Space properties and the parks system. The Commission has
briefly discussed this with the thought that maybe there should be a different way of how the City
identifies or looks at open space and parks as part of the overall system.
ACTION REQUIRED
No action is required since this item is for discussion purposes only.
Respectfully submitted,
Todd J. Haas
Cc: Park and Recreation Commission
NDO:
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:,
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Council Members
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
David D. Berkowitz, City Enginee 1 ctor of Public Works
��
Todd J. Haas, Assistant Public Works PJirector/Parks Coordinator
F. Discuss Community—Wide Survey - Engineering
January 24, 2017
D
INTRODUCTION
This is an update item for the City Council regarding the Community wide survey and the questions
that the Park and Recreation Commission will be formulating.
DISCUSSION
The Park and Recreation will be having a joint meeting with the YMCA Community Center Advisory
Commission on Thursday, February 16, 2017. The YMCA Community Center Advisory Commission
will be meeting 6 pm. Shortly thereafter at 7 pm the Park and Recreation Commission will meet with
the YMCA Community Center Advisory Commission to formulate questions for the upcoming survey.
Once the questions have been formulated, the City Council will have opportunity to review the
questions to determine if they would like to modify any of the questions or eliminate any of them from
the survey.
ACTION REQUIRED
No action is necessary as this update as to the status of the Park and Recreation Commission and when
they will be formulating the questions for the upcoming survey.
Respectfully submitted,
40ICAIA«
Todd J. Haas
Cc: Park and Recreation Commission
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Council Members
a"
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public orks / City Engineer
0
SUBJECT: Approve Tree Clearing Quotes/16-40, Smith's Green Acres Ditch Cleaning & 17-
18, South Access to Woodland Creek Wetland Restoration - Engineering
DATE: January 24, 2017
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is requested to approve the tree clearing quotes for Projects 16-40, Smith's Green
Acres Ditch Cleaning & 17-18, South Access to Woodland Creek Wetland Restoration.
DISCUSSION
Quotes will be received on Tuesday, January 24, 2017 and will be presented at the meeting.
BUDGETIMPACT
Tree clearing for the ditch would be funded through Storm Water Utility and funding for the Woodland
Creek Wetland Restoration access will be from funds generated from real state transactions which are
within the Building Fund.
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to approve the tree clearing quotes for Projects 16-40, Smith's Green
Acres Ditch Cleaning & 17-18, South Access to Woodland Creek Wetland Restoration which will be
presented at the meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
David D. Berkowitz
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administ
FROM: David D. Berkowitz, Director
Engineer
SUBJECT: Update on Hanson Boulevard NW Reconstruction from Jay St. NW to
Crosstown Blvd. NW/15-16/ —Engineering
DATE: January 24, 2017
0
INTRODUCTION
An update on the Hanson Boulevard Reconstruction project will be provided at the meeting.
DISCUSSION
Anoka County Highway Department has scheduled an open house for Wednesday, February 22nd
Staff will update the Council on the current layout and answer any questions at the meeting.
ACTION REQUIRED
This is for information only and no action is required at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
iM.eQ
David D. Berkowitz
ND.
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and Councilmembers
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
Community Survey Discussion
January 24, 2017
INTRODUCTION
0
During the City of Andover 2017 Budget and 2017-2021 CIP development discussions, there
was a desire to pursue a community survey to determine resident support for current city
services, programs and potential capital projects. At the workshop, Administration will seek
direction from the Council on how to proceed with a community survey.
DISCUSSION
The last Community Survey was done in 2014 by The Morris Leatherman Company. Attached
to this staff report is that survey and a copy of the presentation made to the Council in April of
2014.
Administration has had discussions with Peter Leatherman from the Morris Leatherman
Company to discuss process, timing and potential questions for a City of Andover Community
Survey. Cost of a survey was also discussed, the cost will depend on the number of questions
asked and the number of meetings involved (proposal attached - Administration is anticipating
an $18,000 budget).
It was suggested the Council review the 2014 survey questions and provide direction on City
Commission involvement and what types of questions the Council would like asked on the next
survey.
The goal is to have a draft questionnaire ready for Council review by the end of February,
finalized in early March, and the survey conducted in late March early April.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is requested to review the attached 2014 Survey, receive a presentation from City
Administration and provide direction to staff on what type of questions the Council would like to
see in the 2017 Survey and the level of involvement by the City Commissions.
Pickin
lly submitted,
son
Attachments
The Morris Leatherman Company
3128 Dean Court
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
January 10, 2017
Mr. Jim Dickinson
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, Minnesota 55304
Dear Jim:
The Morris Leatherman Company is pleased to present this survey research proposal to you for
the City of Andover. This prospectus is organized in three parts: a potential design; project
schedule; and, estimated project costs. As you will see, I am certain that we can provide the City
of Andover with the information it seeks in both a cost-effective and timely manner.
DESIGN OF THE RESEARCH.
The Morris Leatherman Company proposes to conduct a telephone survey of 400 randomly
selected households in the City of Andover. A sample of 400 residents would provide results
projectable to the entire city adult population within f 5.0 percent in 95 out of 100 cases. The
sample is also of sufficient size to permit the city to be divided into a maximum of four to five
categories for more detailed analysis, such as age, mobility, home ownership, location of
residence, presence of children, and other demographic characteristics.
To insure the integrity of the sample, the Morris Leatherman Company places the most exacting
sampling standards in the industry on our procedures. MLC uses a mix of random digit dial
landline and cell phone numbers. Before an alternate household is substituted for a designated
target, at least ten tries are made to contact the initial households during a five-day period. The
telephone calls take place during various times on weekday evenings and during the weekend.
Our interviewers are also instructed to seek convenient appointments with interviewees, cutting
our non -contact rate to less than five percent on average. An unbiased selection process is also
used to identify the adult member of the household to be interviewed. To validate the completed
sample, the latest United States Census updated population characteristics are utilized as a
standard of comparison.
City of Andover
Residential Survey Research Proposal
January 2017
The questionnaire would be administered by company trained and supervised personnel. The
computer analysis will be obtained from our in-house C -MENTOR and SPSS statistical analysis
systems, insuring both access to the most current analysis programs and confidentiality of the
data set.
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
1. Planning with City Council Members, City Staff, and/or relevant individuals to establish the
topics to be covered in the survey. Based on these topic concepts, the Morris Leatherman
Company would word specific, neutral questions. This activity can be completed by a meeting,
telephone and/or fax, depending on client wishes, within two weeks of the initiation of the
contract.
2. Structuring of questions and final approval of the survey instrument. These activities are
usually completed within three weeks of the discussion of topics to be covered in the survey.
3. Final determination of the field dates for interviewing.
4. Pre -testing and, if needed, approval of resulting revisions. This activity is usually completed
by the second day of fieldwork.
5. Completion of all fieldwork within a two -to -three week period.
6. Computer analysis and preparation of written report. All analytical tests and commentary will
be available within six weeks after completion of the fieldwork.
7. Delivery of the final written report to the City of Andover, including presentation graphics.
Afterwards, telephone consultation, as the need arises, will be provided about the study's
findings and implications.
PROJECT COSTS.
The cost of a survey is driven by two factors: sample size and questionnaire length. The cost to
conduct a 50 question survey would be $13,000.00. Each additional question unit beyond the
initial allotment would be $135.00. The cost of survey with a questionnaire length between 90
and 110 questions would be between $18,000 and $20,000.
As company policy, the Morris Leatherman Company requires one-half of the cost prior to the
commencement of fieldwork; the remainder is due upon delivery of the final written report.
Unless otherwise arranged, the Morris Leatherman Company invoices clients for the initial
payment at the time of the initiation of the contract; the remainder is due at the time of the receipt
of the final written report.
City of Andover
Residential Survey Research Proposal
January 2017
If you require any further information from us, feel free to contact either Bill Morris, Diane
Traxler, or me. We look forward to the opportunity to work with the City of Andover again.
Sincerely,
PetFn Zea&ut"
Peter Leatherman
Vice President
THE MORRIS LEATHERMAN COMPANY
3128 Dean Court
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414
ANDOVER RESIDENTIAL
SURVEY
FINAL FEBRUARY 2014
Hello, I'm of the Morris Leatherman Company, a polling
firm located in Minneapolis. We've been retained by the City of
Andover to speak with a random sample of residents about issues
facing the city. The survey is being taken because your city
representatives and staff are interested in your opinions and
suggestions. I want to assure you that all individual responses
will be held strictly confidential; only summaries of the entire
sample will be reported. (DO NOT PAUSE)
1. Approximately how many years have
you lived in the City of Andover?
2. How would you rate
life in. Andover --
good, only fair, or
LESS THAN ONE YEAR ...... 2%
ONE OR TWO YEARS........ 8%
THREE TO FIVE YEARS.... 17%
SIX TO TEN YEARS....... 24%
ELEVEN - TWENTY YRS .... 30%
OVER TWENTY YEARS ..... :19%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
the quality of EXCELLENT..............42%
excellent, GOOD...................55%
poor? ONLY FAIR...............2%
POOR....................1%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
3. What do you like most about living
in Andover?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
SMALL TOWN FEEL........ 220
FRIENDLY PEOPLE........
14%
OPEN SPACES/RURAL......
18%
HOUSING/NEIGHBORHOOD...15%
SCHOOLS.................6%
CONVENIENT LOCATION.....
3%
CLOSE TO FAMILY/FRIEND..6%
CLOSE TO JOB ............
9%
CLOSE TO SHOPPING .......
3%
QUIET AND PEACEFUL......
2%
SCATTERED ................
2%
4. What do you,think is the most
serious issue facing the City of
Andover today?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 4%
NOTHING................38%
63%
HIGH TAXES.............10%
13%
TOO MUCH GROWTH........
11%
TRAFFIC CONGESTION ......
8%
ROAD MAINTENANCE .......
20%
LACK OF JOBS ............
2%
RISING CRIME ............
3%
SCATTERED...............5%
34%
5. How would you rate the sense of EXCELLENT..............25%
community pride among Andover GOOD...................65%
residents -- excellent, good, only ONLY FAIR...............9%
fair, or poor? POOR....................1%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 1%
Let's talk about community characteristics in Andover. For each
of the following, please tell me if you feel the city has enough,
too many, or too little....
ENO MAN LIT DKR
6.
Rental units?
63%
14%
13%
10%
7.
Townhomes?
72%
15%
7%
7%
8.
Starter homes for .young families?
51%
7%
34%
8%
9.
"Move Up" housing?
67%
8%
18%
8%
10.
Higher cost housing?
58%
26.%
9%
7%
11.
Nursing homes?
39%
8%
36%
17%
12.
Assisted living for seniors?
41%
7%
33%
20%
13.
One level housing for seniors
maintained by an association?
38%
6%
34%
23%
14.
Parks and open spaces?
82%
11%
6%
1%
15.
Trails and bikeways?
78%
10%
13%
0%
16.
Service establishments, such as
dry cleaners and barbershops?
62%
7%
31%
1%
17.
Retail shopping opportunities?
54%
9%
37%
0%
18.
Entertainment establishments?
53%
6%
41%
0%
19.
Dining establishments?
50%
10%
400
0%
Turning to city services....
I would like to read you a list of a few city services. For each
one, please tell me whether you would rate the quality of the
service as excellent, good, only fair, or poor....
20. Police protection?
21. Fire protection?
22. Storm drainage and flood
control?
23. Park maintenance?
24. Trail maintenance?
25. Animal control?
EXCL
GOOD
FAIR
POOR
DK/R
47%
46%
5%
1%
1%
47%
50%
0%
1%
3%
140
72%
8%
3%
4%
31%
67%
1%
0%
1%
31%
65%
1%
0%
3%
12%
72%
5%
2%
9%
IF "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR," ASK
26. Why do you feel that way?
(n=80)
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 1%
LACK OF PATROLLING .....
13%
FLOODING...............44%
FAIR POOR
LOOSE ANIMALS ..........
15%
WILDLIFE ISSUES .........
5%
POOR UPKEEP.............3%
SLOW POLICE RESPONSE.—.3%
NEED OWN POLICE DPT .....
9%
SCATTERED...............7%
9%
For the next three city services, please consider only their job
on city -maintained streets and roads in neighborhoods. That means
you should exclude state and county roads, such as Round Lake
Boulevard, Hanson Boulevard, Crosstown Boulevard and Bunker Lake
Boulevard, that are taken care of by other levels of government.
Keeping that in mind, would you rate each of the following as
excellent, good, only fair or poor.....
EXCL GOOD
FAIR POOR
DK/R
27.
City street repair
and
maintenance?
9%
43%
37% 12%
0%
28.
Snow plowing?
29%
60%
10% 20
0%
29.
Street lighting?
18%
58%
16% 6%
2%
30.
Are there current
city services
DON'T
KNOW/REFUSED......
1%
you would like to
see enhanced or
NO.....................55%
new city services
you would like
ROAD
MAINTENANCE .......
36%
to see offered?
(IF "YES," ASK:)
STREET
LIGHTS ...........
2%
What would those
be?
SCATTERED
...............6%
31. Compared to nearby cities, do you
think that the property taxes in
Andover are very high, somewhat
high, about average, somewhat low,
or very low?
32. Do you feel the quality of city
services has been able to keep
pace with growth in the city?
IF "NO," ASK: (n=16)
VERY HIGH ............... 7%
SOMEWHAT HIGH.......... 33%
ABOUT AVERAGE .......... 51%
SOMEWHAT LOW ............. 3%
VERY LOW................0%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 7%
YES....................94%
NO......................4%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 2%
33. What services, in particular, have not been able to
keep pace?
ROAD MAITENANCE, 50%; FLOODING CONTROL, 19%; TRAFFIC
FLOW, 13%; CODE ENFORCEMENT, 13%; SNOW PLOWING, 6%.
34. When you consider the city prop- EXCELLENT...............9%
erty taxes you payand the quality GOOD...................75%
of city services you receive, ONLY FAIR...............9%
would you rate the general value POOR....................2%
of city services as excellent, DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 5%
good, only fair, or poor?
Moving on....
35. What do you consider to be the greatest public safety con-
cern in Andover? (DO NOT READ LIST)
36. Do you have a second public safety concern in the city?
(DO NOT READ LIST)
FIRST SECOND
Violent crime............................0%........1%
VERY SERIOUS ............ 9%
Traffic speeding........................29%.......12%
SOMEWHAT SERIOUS.......
35%
Drugs...................................12%.......10%
NOT TOO SERIOUS ........
37%
Youth crimes and vandalism ..............
17%.......23%
20%
Identity theft...........................30........2%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......
0%
Break-ins and theft from automobiles ....
12%
....... 140
Business crimes, such as shop-
REASONABLY SAFE........
44%
lifting and check fraud.............4%.........4%
SOMEWHAT UNSAFE .........
6%
Residential crimes, such as
VERY UNSAFE ............
'.3%
burglary, and theft ................
12%.......12%
0%
ELSE (PEDESTRIAN SAFETY).................2%........1%
NONE.....................................6%.......20%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.......................3%........2%
37. How would you rate the amount of
patrolling the Anoka County Sher-
iff's Department does in your
neighborhood -- would you say they
do too much, about the right
amount, or not enough?
TOO MUCH................2%
ABOUT RIGHT AMOUNT ..... 71%
NOT ENOUGH.............28%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
38. How serious a problem is traffic
VERY SERIOUS ............ 9%
speeding in your neighborhood --
SOMEWHAT SERIOUS.......
35%
very serious, somewhat serious,
NOT TOO SERIOUS ........
37%
not too serious, or not at all.
NOT AT ALL SERIOUS.....
20%
serious?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......
0%
39. How safe would you feel walking
VERY SAFE..............47%
alone in your neighborhood after
REASONABLY SAFE........
44%
dark -= very safe, reasonably
SOMEWHAT UNSAFE .........
6%
safe, somewhat unsafe, or very
VERY UNSAFE ............
'.3%
unsafe?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......
0%
Moving on....
40. How would you rate your ability EXCELLENT..............27%
to get where you need to go in SATISFACTORY ........... 66%
Andover in a reasonable amount MARGINAL................7%
of time -- excellent, satis- POOR....................lo
factory, marginal, or poor? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
IF "MARGINAL" OR "POOR," ASK: (n=31)
41. Why do you feel that way?
TRAFFIC CONGESTION ..... 19%
POTHOLES...............52%
TOO MANY STOPLIGHTS.... 26%
TOO MANY STOP SIGNS ..... 3%
If you work outside of the home, please answer the next questions
about your own job; if you do not work outside of the home,
please answer the next questions in terms of the job of your
spouse or partner, if applicable.
42. What is
your average
commute time
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
to your
job location?
5 MINUTES OR LESS ....... 4%
6 TO 10 MINUTES ........ 14%
11 TO 15 MINUTES....... 17%
16 TO 20 MINUTES....... 15%
21 TO 30 MINUTES ........ 9%
OVER 30 MINUTES ........ 22%
NOT APPLICABLE ......... 20%
43. In what
city is your
job located?
NOT APPLICABLE ......... 19%
ANDOVER................23%
BLAINE..................8%
COON RAPIDS ............. 12%
MINNEAPOLIS ............ 17%
ANOKA...................4%
VARIES..................2%
BROOKLYN PARK ........... 2%
SAINT PAUL..............2%
FRIDLEY/COLUMBIA HGTS... 3%
REST OF HENNEPIN CO ..... 2%
REST OF METRO ........... 6%
44. How do
you normally commute
to
DRIVE ALONE ............ 73%
work --
drive alone,
ride in a van
VAN OR CAR POOL......... 3%
or car
pool, take the
bus from
TAKE BUS................2%
near home, use a park
and ride
PARK AND RIDE LOT ....... 0%
lot, walk
or bike or
something
WALK/BIKE...............2%
else?
SOMETHING ELSE.......... 0%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
NOT APPLICABLE ......... 21%
IF."DRIVE ALONE," "VAN OR CAR POOL," OR "WALK/BIKE,".ASK:
(n=310)
45. If it were convenient, would YES....................19%
you be willing to commute NO.....................80%
using public transit? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 1%
46. What changes would make pub- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 2%
lic transit more convenient NONE...................77%
for you? MORE CONVENIENT ROUTES.11%
MORE CONVENIENT TIMES ... 9%
MORE STOPS..............1%
47. How often do you drive on Bunker FREQUENTLY.............25%
Lake Boulevard over the railroad OCCASIONALLY ........... 46%
tracks - frequently, occasionally, RARELY.................24%
rarely or never? NEVER...................5%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 1%
48. Should a vehicle overpass
be con-
STRONGLY YES ............ 5%
structed over the railroad
tracks
YES....................32%
on Bunker Lake Boulevard?
(WAIT
NO.....................40%
FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel
strong-
STRONGLY NO ............
12%
ly that way?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.....
12%
IF A RESPONSE IS GIVEN, ASK: (n=353)
49. Why do you feel that way?
SAFETY.................20%
LESS TRAFFIC CONGEST ... 23%
HIGH COST..............23%
TOO MUCH CONSTRUTION.... 7%
NOT NEEDED.............20%
NOT A PROBLEM ........... 4
NOT MUCH TRAFFIC ........ 3%
SCATTERED...............1%
IF "STRONGLY YES" OR 'AYES" IN QUESTION #48, ASK: (n=148)
50. How much would you be willing NOTHING................19%
to see your property taxes $10.00.................50%
increase in order to fund $20.00 .................14%
this vehicle overpass? Would $30.00..................9%
you be willing to pay $ $40.00 ..................2%
per year? (CHOOSE RANDOM $50.00 ..................0%
STARTING POINT; MOVE UP OR $60.00 ..................1%
DOWN DEPENDING ON ANSWER) OVER $60.00 .............1%
How about $ per year? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 4%
Moving on....
Currently, the City of Andover generally enforces codes concerning
residential property when a complaint is made. Some cities take a
more active approach and inspect residential neighborhoods for code
violations on an on-going basis.
51.
Would you favor or oppose a more
STRONGLY FAVOR ........... 7%
active approach by the City in the
FAVOR...................38%
enforcement of residential pro-
OPPOSE..................39%
perty codes? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE)
STRONGLY OPPOSE .........
11%
Do you feel strongly that way?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED .......
5%
For
each of the following, please tell
me whether the City is too
tough, about right, or not tough enough
in enforcing city codes on
these nuisances.
TOO
NOT ABO DK/
TOU
TOU RIG REE
52.
Loose animals? 2%
13% 82% 4%
53.
Junk cars on residential
property? 2%
25% 72% 1%
54.
Establishment and main-
tenance of lawns on
residential property? 1%
13% 85% 1%
55.
Storage of boats on
residential property? 4%
13% 83% 1%
56.
Storage of RVs on
residential property? 3%
13% 83% 1%
57.
Upkeep of boulevards and
public right of ways? 1%
16% 83% 1%
58.
Upkeep and maintenance of
fences? 1%
14% 84% 1%
59.
Upkeep and.maintenance of
residential properties? 20-6
15% 83% 0%
Continuing....
60.
How important are natural re-
VERY IMPORTANT .........
46%
sources and environmental issues
SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT.....
44%
to you - very important, somewhat
NOT TOO IMPORTANT .......
8%
important, not too important or
NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT....
2%
not at all important?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......
0%
61.
What do you think is the greatest
natural resource or
environmental issue facing the city? (ROTATE AND READ
LIST)
TREE DISEASES, SUCH AS OAK WILT AND
DUTCH ELM DISEASE .........................9%
INVASIVE INSECTS AND DISEASES, SUCH AS
THE EMERALD ASH BORER AND ASIAN
LONG -HORNED BEETLE .......................
16%
INVASIVE PLANTS, SUCH AS BUCKTHORN.............3%
PROTECTING LAKES, RIVERS, STREAMS
AND WETLANDS.............................24%
LOWERING GROUNDWATER USAGE FOR LAWN
CARE PRACTICES ............................6%
PRESERVING OPEN SPACES ........................
24%
PROTECTING TREES DURING DEVELOPMENT ...........
13%
OTHER..........................................0%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED..........'....................5%
62. Are you aware of the open space YES.....................51%
program? NO.....................49%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
63. Are you aware of open space areas YES....................49%
in the city? NO......................51%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 1%
IF "YES," ASK: (n=194)
64. Have you visited any open DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 3%
space areas.in the city? NO.....................61%
(IF "YES," ASK:) Which YES/DON'T REMEMBER NAME.5%
ones? BUNKER PARK.............7%
SUNSHINE PARK ........... 2%
BUNKER BEACH ............ 9%
LIONS PARK..............3%
WOODLAND................2%
RUM RIVER REGIONAL PARK.2%
KELSEY ROUND LAKE ....... 3%
SCATTERED ............... 3%
65. Do you think open space areas need YES....................78%
to be accessible to the public? NO.....................13%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 9%
66. Do you prefer fewer but larger LARGER.................55%
open spaces areas OR more but SMALLER................33%
smaller open space areas? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED..... 12%
67. How often do you or members of FREQUENTLY.............25%
your household use city trails - OCCASIONALLY ........... 40%
frequently, occasionally, rarely RARELY.................17%
or never? NEVER..................18%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
IF "FREQUENTLY" "OCCASIONALLY" OR "RARELY," ASK: (n=327)
68. What do you use them for most DON'T .KNOW/REFUSED ...... 0%
often? WALKING................58%
RUNNING/JOGGING ........ 18%
BICYCLING..............24%
69. Do you
support or oppose the use
STRONGLY SUPPORT.......
12%
of city
funding for additional
SUPPORT................59%
trails
in the City? (WAIT FOR RE-
OPPOSE.................23%
SPONSE)
Do you feel strongly that
STRONGLY OPPOSE .........
6%
way?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......
1%
Turning to parks and recreation....
70. Overall, how would you rate the EXCELLENT..............17%
city parks and recreation facile- GOOD...................76%
ties in Andover - excellent, good, ONLY FAIR...............5%
only fair or poor? POOR....................1%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 2%
71. How often do you or members of FREQUENTLY.............24%
your household use city parks and OCCASIONALLY.; ......... 41%
recreation facilities — frequent- RARELY.................14%
ly, occasionally, rarely or never? NEVER..................20%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
IF "FREQUENTLY" "OCCASIONALLY" OR "RARELY," ASK: (n=319)
72. What -do you use them for most DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
often? EXERCISE...............41%
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT... 28%
COMMUNITY CENTER....... 12%
BALLFIELDS.............18%
FAMILY GATHERINGS ....... 2%
For each of the following, please tell me if you think Andover's
facilities are much better in comparison to other cities, somewhat
better, about the same, somewhat worse or much worse in comparison
to other cities. .
73. City park system?
74. Youth athletic facilities?
75. Adult recreation facilities?
MBT SBT SAM SWR MWR DKR
8% 30% 58% 2% 0% 3%
40 23% 59% 5% 0% 10%
3% 19% 65% 6% 0% 8%
76. Have you or members of
your house-
YES....................49%
12%
hold used the Andover
Community
NO.....................51%
Center during the past
year?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......
0%
IF."YES," ASK: (n=197)
77. Overall, how would you rate EXCELLENT........:.....41%
the.Community Center -- ex- GOOD...................57%
cellent, good, only fair, or ONLY FAIR...............2%
poor? POOR....I. — ...........0%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
IF "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR," ASK: (n=4)
78. Why did you rate it as (only fair/poor)?
NOT OPEN ENOUGH HOURS, 50%; COSTS,T00 MUCH, 50%.
79. How satisfied are you with
the current offerings at the
Community Center - very sat-
isfied, somewhat satisfied,
not too satisfied,.or not at
all satisfied?
VERY SATISFIED ......... 52°%
SOMEWHAT SATISFIED..... 46%
NOT TOO SATISFIED ....... 2%
NOT AT ALL SATISFIED.... 0%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 1%
IF "NOT TOO SATISFIED" OR "NOT AT ALL SATISFIED," ASK:
(n=3)
80. Why do you feel that way?
NOT ENOUGH PROGRAMS, 33%; NOT ENOUGH FOR YOUNG
CHILDREN, 67%.
81. Would you
favor or oppose. the City
STRONGLY SUPPORT.......
12%
offering
a teen center in Andover?
SUPPORT................57%
(WAIT FOR
RESPONSE) Do you feel
OPPOSE.................22%
strongly.that
way?
STRONGLY OPPOSE .........
2%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......
7%
The City of Andover is considering a voter referendum to fund the
enhancement of the park and recreation system in the community.
82. Would you support or oppose the
STRONGLY SUPPORT ........ 6%
enhancements of the parks and
SUPPORT................61%
70%
recreation system? (WAIT FOR
OPPOSE.................26%
CABLE TELEVISION ........
RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly
STRONGLY OPPOSE .........
4%
that way?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......
4%
83. How much would you be willing to.
NOTHING................41%
see your property taxes increase
$10.00 .................27%
in order to fund these enhance-
$20.00 .................13%
ments? Would you be willing to
$30.00 ..................3%
pay $_ per year?
$40.00 ..................2%
(CHOOSE RANDOM STARTING POINT;
$50.00 ..................2%
MOVE UP OR DOWN DEPENDING ON
$60.00 ..................2%
ANSWER.) How about $ per year?
$70.00 ..................1%
(REPEAT PROCESS)
$80.00 ..................0%
$90.00 ..................1%
$100.00 .................1%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......
8%
Moving on....
84. What is your primary source
formation about Andover City
.ernment and its activities?
of in- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
Gov- NONE....................1%
CITY NEWSLETTER ........ 71%
LOCAL NEWSPAPER ........ 12%
CABLE TELEVISION ........ 2%
CITY WEBSITE ... ........ 10%
WORD OF MOUTH ........... 3%
SCATTERED...............2%
85. How would you prefer to receive
information about City Government
and its activities?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
NONE....................1%
CITY NEWSLETTER ........
70%
LOCAL NEWSPAPER ........
11%
CABLE TELEVISION ........
2%
CITY WEBSITE ...........
11%
WORD OF MOUTH ...........
3%
MEETINGS................2%
SCATTERED...............1%
The City publishes a bi-monthly newsletter, called "Andover
Today."
86. Do you receive this newsletter?
(IF."YES," ASK:) How would you
rate the format -- excellent,
good, only fair or poor?
IF "YES," ASK: (n=369)
NO.......................8%
YES/EXCELLENT .......... 41%
YES/GOOD...............49%
YES/ONLY FAIR ........... 3%
YES/POOR ................ 0%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
87. How much of the city news- ALL OF IT..............50%
letter do you read -- all of MOST OF IT.............37%
it, most of it, some of it, SOME OF IT.............11%
or very little? VERY LITTLE.............2%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
88. Does your household currently sub- CABLE..................55%
scribe to cable television, sat- SATELLITE..............32%
ellite television or neither? NEITHER;...............14%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 0
IF "YES," ASK: (n=219)
89. How often do you watch An- FREQUENTLY..............5%
dover City Council Meetings OCCASIONALLY ........... 23%
or City Commission meetings, RARELY.................13%
such as Planning and Park and NOT AT ALL.............58%
Recreation, on channel 16 -- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
frequently, occasionally,
rarely or not at all?
90. Do you have access
to the Internet
YES/YES................46%
at home or work?
(WAIT FOR RE-
YES/NO.................43%
SPONSE) Have you
accessed the
NO.....................11%
city website from
either location?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......
0%
IF "YES/YES," ASK: (n=185)
91. Did you find the information YES....................98%
you were looking for? NO......................2%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
IF "YES," ASK: (n=181)
92. What information do you DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
look for most often on JUST BROWSING .......... 42%
the city's website? BUDGET INFORMATION ...... 7%
COUNCIL DECISIONS ....... 8%
PARKS AND RECREATION... 30%
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .... 2
CITY CODES..............6%
GENERAL INFORMATION ..... 2%
COMMUNITY ED ............ 2%
CITY EVENTS.............2%
IF "NO" IN QUESTION #91, ASK
93. What information were
you looking for?
(n=4)
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT... 75%
CITY NEWS..............25%
94. How interested would you be
VERY INTERESTED .........
28%
in subscribing to receive
SOMEWHAT INTERESTED .....
35%
e-mails containing city infor-
NOT TOO INTERESTED ......
15%
mation and news - very inte-
NOT AT ALL INTERESTED...
21%
rested, somewhat interested,
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED .......
2%
not too interested or not at
all interested?
95. Are you aware the City of
NO......................41%
Andover is on Facebook? '(IF
YES/YES.................24%
"YES," ASK:) Do you view the
YES/NO..................35%
city's Facebook page?
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ........
1%
96. How would you rate the City's
overall performance.in communicat-
ing key local issues to residents
in its publications, newspaper
columns, and on cable television
-- excellent, good, only fair, or
poor?
EXCELLENT..............15%
GOOD...................71%
ONLY FAIR..............10%
POOR....................2%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ....... 2%
Now just a few more questions for demographic purposes....
97. How often would you say you vote ALWAYS.................6.9%
-- always, nearly always, part of NEARLY ALWAYS .......... 25%
the time, or seldom? PART OF THE TIME ........ 4%
SELDOM..................3%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
From time to time, cities and school districts ask voters to
approve referendum proposals...
98. Thinking about past city and
school district referendum elec-
tions, would you say you always
vote, often vote,' sometimes vote,
rarely vote or never vote?
ALWAYS VOTE ............ 63%
OFTEN VOTE.............26%
SOMETIMES VOTE.......... 6%
RARELY VOTE.............4%
NEVER VOTE..............2%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 0%
Could you please tell me how many people in each of the following
age groups live in your household. Let's start with the oldest.
Be sure to include yourself.
99. First, persons 65 or over? NONE...................84%
ONE.....................6%
TWO OR MORE ............ 10%
100. Adults, 18 to 65?
101. School -aged or pre-school
children?
102. What is your age, please?
103. Do you own or rent your present
residence? (IF "OWN," ASK:) Which
of the following categories would
contain the approximate value of
your residential property -- under
$200,000, $200,000-$250,000,
$250,001-$300,000, $300,-001-
$350,000, $350,001-$400,000 or
over $400;000?
104. Gender (BY OBSERVATION)
NONE...................10%
ONE.....................6%
TWO.....................73%
THREE OR MORE.......... 11%
NONE...................52%
ONE....................14%
TWO....................25%
THREE OF MORE ........... 9%
18-24 ...................3%
25-34 ..................15%
35-44 ..................280
45-54 ..................28%
55-64 ..................16%
65 AND OVER.............11%
REFUSED.................0%
RENT....................7%
OWN/UNDER $200,000......9%
OWN/$200,000-$250,000..31%
OWN/$250,001-$300,000..36%
OWN/$300,001-$350,000..11%
OWN/$350,001-$400,000...2%
OWN/OVER $400,000.......2%
DON'T KNOW..............1%
REFUSED..................2%
MALE...................49%
FEMALE.................31%
105. REGION OF CITY
PCT 1 ..................11%
PCT 2 ..................10%
PCT 3 ..................12%
PCT 4 ...................9%
PCT 5 ..................11%
PCT 6 ...................8%
PCT 7 ...................8%
PCT 8 ...................9%
PCT 9 ...................9%
PCT 10 .................12%
CITY OF ANDOVER
2014 Quality of Life Study
The Morris Leatherman Company
Quality of Life Rating
2014 City of Andover
ru
eo
w "
zo '
1U _I_ 2
0
Eua0N1 Goof Orly Fair Poor U..
[2MSW0y-1014SWCy
m. w.m f.re.� pay
Like Most about City
2014 City of Andover
Un
UU—m
smNiz
smmi raw
IbuslrryNeg00Mi_ as
oWa r
PNge u
sale
RU.Vopm Space
PaU
Sh.W, e
S aP"N
0 5 10 t5 w 20 Sp
X2005 �ZOIt SWdy
4/29/2014
1
Most Serious Issue
2014 City of Andover
unr..
T—
.0
um r�
rm.
.rah �• ,
am.o W
Nut Mep Px Frpu
NutMUPaa � ,
Su4 P¢
Ndua
LtldYb 3
f N
0 t0 0 b p MI
X2000 sOMy �ZO1� SOMy
m.aa,m lam.aa.�Oom.a
Sense of Community Pride
2014 City of Andover
tp i I
EttatM,nt m '
eb
GOaa
P I I
O ly Fav 0
1
2
U..
o to 20 00 w 50 00 70 80
�zooe sway �zou staey
Characteristics of City
2014 City of Andover
u
tt
n
awro al
.,.rxa...a »
< m
m enµpm wM.ra�s m
E nrranr p
a.+uemw p
0 20 a0 MI 80 100 120
�TaO Many oenou0h mRoO wtlb
4/29/2014
2
City Service Ratings
2014 City of Andover
vae.a,dea
r nuea�
s�o 0oams�caea
wkirri...
r�ruWaso
,uar cava
Ory9eea PgaMVY�q
ae.w..o
se.afgre
�POaitive �NpNve
m Morro L.m R a.y
Property Taxes
2014 City of An,iover
w
50
30
20
10 0 5
0
v.n MT 6aiwf�alyl MYI.r4 b u.a.
�Y000 Sway r•201/ SwOy
m. xaro f.aa,.e raf.a.
Services Kept Pace with Growth
2014 City of Andover
120
fao
t12 W � 14Skay
e 5
0
Y. NO Unu2
m. aw.. uan.— rrra
4/29/2014
J
Value of City Services
2014 City of Andover
100
.. ..........s
� ee
eo
eo
20 e a u
s
o �
ExmlMni Good Gab EMr Poor Unw
.za06 sway �zau sway
Public Safety Concerns
2014 City of Andover
7C
p
Mei1MMYds �
Fu,bW Cm® M
R'W M
1TM1 6 '
c.a.mw bl4
n++e a
0 10 20 00 W 60
�Moq SedouB �SemnaMml
m. •wm uw.� �r
Amount of Neighborhood Patrolling
2014 City of Andover
71
e6
60
ao 35
26
20
2 2
a
Too MU AEaal Rigla Nal Em h Ua
X2006 Sway X201/Swtly
m.+ro,m wn.�m.�ca�r
4/29/2014
F11
Neighborhood Traffic Speeding
2014 City of Andover
�e
xd
Hu roo sme. n ',
r
wuns.oa
0 s 10 is m m m u w
.zoos .201kst*
Walk Alone at Night in Neighborhood
20'14 City of Andover
.......
47 ...-_dt_..-.
s0 a
w "
m
10
0
�mO86b0y �mU SWry
Intra -City Travel
2014 City of Andover
70 —
w..... ..
50 - - ----- _..
w
m
zo
10
0
Futllml Satisfatlpy MmOirW Paar
�20085hMy �xOfI SWry
*M xwu I.�CMmw Cupry
4/29/2014
5
Commute Time
2014 City of Andover
40
3056 Pwnge Gommu[e Tlme 38 MM
2014 Awnap Commub Time � PA Mln.In
ube
25---_._..-_ ... __...
__....__- Zt-
15 _-------------Sk_... _. 15
1p ...____.... LK
5
0
.etM.i41 11ner.r nmtleeM
41010m� bAYbYe >weee4e.
�2Wfi SLq �201d SWry
n. Mww trMnw.. �
Commute Method
2014 City of Andover
m.e<m.1.m..m..�
Vehicle Overpass
2014 City of Andover
w
40
ss
27
% z4
20
17_..___
10 5
0
5;;;Y
Yee Y" No Soon* No UnM1m
1�20pl St W/ 1�20143b0]
Ib Mame lruwrmm �Y
4/29/2014
0
N.—.1 Gommum
2016
2014
n Gonvenienl.
Wfling
to U. Public TnneN
m.e<m.1.m..m..�
Vehicle Overpass
2014 City of Andover
w
40
ss
27
% z4
20
17_..___
10 5
0
5;;;Y
Yee Y" No Soon* No UnM1m
1�20pl St W/ 1�20143b0]
Ib Mame lruwrmm �Y
4/29/2014
0
More Active Code Enforcement
2014 City of Andover
Favor
5896
Strong Favor
_Unsure
5%
Strong Oppose
Oppwe 11°e
3g%
m..w�n uc.nM rix
Code Enforcement
2014 City o£ Andover
rw
n e6 u u u a v
n
20
g • e • a a
r mToo Right MNd Tougtr
m.uorm uye.��u,e.e
Importance of Natural Resources Issues
2014 City of Andover
4/29/2014
7
Greatest Environmental Issue
2014 City of Andover
ID
im..u.en..n B
_ B I
L n...mno v.e�m Of
1]
0 5 10 15 a . 50
�PaRaIBBOe
(Open Space Program Awa
2014 City of An6a�ei
Open Space Areas
2014 City of Andover
NwBo opiin Matted open
Spm NNMOver Bpecn In Cit,
IIS Mom.lullnrm.n Cvq�y
4/29/2014
2
Open Spaces Public Accessibility
2014 City of Andover
1zx
Open Space Area Preference
2014 City of Andover
33%
City Trails
2014 City of Andover
Ue Ey H*Uxhold
M..W.
Pd., U.
4/29/2014
Additional Funding
2014 City of Andover
To
_._ 37
50
w
20 23 22
20 12 12
8'__
0 2
0
✓bmuN�Tp^� eMV^'r Wy � e4u9�Y� IMrn
city Tiaib �Taen Cenbr
City Park and Recreation Facilities
2614 City of Andover
�e ink"
n
m. ue,r wm.� cao.q
Use of Park and Recreation Facilities
2014 City of Andover
I I ryll4r.,,iI,
4/29/2014
10
Comparison of Facilities
2014 City of Andover
m
Toww .......
W
0......_
38 ...
20
0 10
0
urMer+.a YmNNru� aerwo.rsswr
�Betbr \hboul5ama �Woeae �Unuve
Community Center Usage
2014 City of Andover
Used dunng
NOY.,
0 a�brw
:x
Community
Center flati,
Satisfaction with Center Offerings
2014 City of Andover
Wry Satlsrbtl
52%
Not T. S tia<ed
2%
So111ee/11et Setle1r04
N%
lno ....mi..::un Cwmm�v
4/29/2014
11
Park Bond Referendum
2014 City of Andover
_ emm
avm
sXom
s»m ca.bn i...i •,
imm o I I
Ennante .a Parks S90
and RecreaMon eyaMm
llmm
o m m a a m
AMoapMkb Yurry Pr00aEEY
Tea I...
Sources of Information
2014 City of Andover
NO�n
n
cnv NarymBf n
x
tare)NawaPeAbr
cede TelvRacRl X
a
warsne n '
a
GMMWne a
M.finw a
0 20 b 00 W
�PMnery �Pralartad
1n.�wn.nnn tmF.o
"Andover Today"
2014 City of Andover
Re a;
DJn1RgX E ;
WYp MFom�a '
ExmlbM a ''
Goon a '
Only Fah/ a
�Pamlpa
wan u
MOa1aX h
SnmeaX nl
very Unb x
0 20 0 e0 80 100 120
1M w,a...wnn.o eaF.n
4/29/2014
12
Cable Television
2014 City of Andover
Rant, GYrarprmry
A .4
n, W
—fip p
R
Xmr
6M
Gl1e 9uEaarlbr Watching City Council or
Commission Meetings
Tl.uwrol.c.roNren.a
City Website
2014 City of Andover
Vas
52%
No ea
% 89%
No
48%
Into mm Access
viewed Citys Wehaito
Subscribe to a -Mails for News
and Information
2014 City of Andover
vilrylnMmsMd
28%
Somawhal Imeresl.
35%
UnA..
2%
4P. -
At Al lntenotetl
Not Too lnMreMul 21%
15%
4/29/2014
13
Communications Performance
2014 City of Andover
80 ]1
w
M20 ShWy
a �zou sexy
20 - is
OA
10
3
ExoNMrO Gaotl ONy Fair Poor Unsure
4/29/2014
14
; C I T Y 0 �`' E" /
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: December 2016 General Fund Budget Progress Report
DATE: January 24, 2017
INTRODUCTION
The City of Andover 2016 General Fund Budget contains total revenues of $10,390,411 and total
expenditures of $11,003,788 (includes $56,000 of 2015 budget carry forwards primarily for
elections and facility management and a Council approved $250,000 transfer to the Trail Fund ); a
decrease in fund balance is planned.
Monthly reporting of the City Budget progress to the Governing body is a recommended financial
practice and often viewed positively by rating agencies.
DISCUSSION
Attached is the General Fund Revenue & Expenditure Budget Summary - Budget Year 2016,
reflecting year to date actual through December 2016. The attachments are provided to assist
discussion in reviewing 2016 progress; other documents may be distributed at the meeting.
Please note the December 2016 report is unaudited.
The following represents Administration's directives and departmental expectations that were in
place for 2016:
1. Expenditure budgets while approved, expenses are to meet with the spirit that needs are
fulfilled first, expansions of service and special requests are to be reviewed with City
Administration before proceeding.
2. Departments are to be committed to search for the best possible prices when purchasing
goods and services.
3. Departments are to be committed to continually searching out new efficiencies and to
challenge the status quo of how the City provides services.
4. Departments are to be committed to searching out collaborative opportunities to facilitate
efficient and cost-effective utilization of governmental assets and personnel.
5. Departments are to be committed to developing effective, consistent and ongoing
communications with City residents, businesses and other stakeholders.
6. Departments are to be cognizant that services provided are subject to available revenues and
should not commit to services that are not sustainable.
ACTION REQUESTED
The Council is requested to receive a presentation and provide direction to staff.
es tfully submitted,
im ickinson
Attachment
CIT OF ANDOVER
General Fund Budget Summary Totals
Budget fear 2016
2015 2016
REVENUES Budget Dec YTD % Bud YE Budget Dec YTD % Bud
2015 1 2016
EXPENDITURES Budget Dec YTD % Bud YE Budget Dec YTD % Bud
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
98%
Mayor and Council
$ 87,154
Administration
180,888
Newsletter
26,000
())--
General Property Tax
$ 7,706,892
$ 7,634,714
99%
$ 7,634,714
$ 8,113,528
$ 8.217,768
101%
_Licenses
Licenses and Permits
316,588
452,422
143%
452,422
346,205
625,979
181%
Facility Management
Intergovernmental
633,015
749,571
118%
749,570
673,248
681,060
101%
94%
Charges for Services
748,550
804,228
107%
804,228
767,950
854,375
111%
240,317
Fines
100,750
99,304
99%
99,304
100,750
82,332
82%
96%
Investment Income
75,000
63,709
85%
63,709
75,000
28,249
38%
406,045
Miscellaneous
98,850
154,889
157%
154,890
116,800
157,401
35/
100%
Transfers In
196,930
196,930
100%
196,930
196,930
196,930
100%
2,511,970
Total Revenues
$ 9,876,575
S 10,155,767
103%
S 10,155,767
$ IQ390,411
$ 10,844094
104%
2015 1 2016
EXPENDITURES Budget Dec YTD % Bud YE Budget Dec YTD % Bud
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
98%
Mayor and Council
$ 87,154
Administration
180,888
Newsletter
26,000
Human Resources
34,643
Attorney
182,000
City Clerk
135,359
Elections
57,492
Finance
245,494
Assessing
150,000
Information Services
172,239
Planning & Zoning
412,937
Engineering
470,631
Facility Management
579,802
Total General Gov
2,734,639
$ 85,028
98%
$ 85,061
$ 88,780
$ 86,582
98%
172,110
95%
172,296
192,778
187,868
97%
21,042
81%
21,042
26,000
22,731
87%
15,875
46%
15,909
35,260
13,398
38%
180,313
99%
180,313
187,640
184,990
99%
134,763
100%
134,776
157,075
148,336
94%
14,496
25%
14,496
82,919
64,433
78%
240,305
98%
240,317
261,016
247,582
95%
143,431
96%
146,315
150,000
143,883
96%
131,742
76%
131,745
173,483
150,135
87%
405,847
98%
406,045
435,606
413,957
95%
464,780
99%
464,842
509,514
511,066
100%
478,008
82%
498,813
568,201
392,509
69%
2,487,740
91%
2,511,970
2,868,272
2,567,470
90%
PUBLICSAFETY
Streets and Highways
625,664
Snow and tee Removal
539,770
Street Signs
203,533
Police Protection
2,918,308
2,918,308
100%
2,918,308
2,936,467
2,936,467
100%
Fire Protection
1,192,330
1,141,300
96%
1,165,221
1,294,795
1,254,763
97%
Protective Inspection
423,161
390,707
92%
391,948
441,807
424,099
96%
Civil Defense
39,189
24,352
62%
24,352
22,982
17,495
76%
Animal Control
9,950
3,470
35%
3,498
7,950
3,308
42%
Total Public Safety
4,582,938
4,478,137
98%
4,503.327
4,704,001
4,636,132
99%
PUBLIC WORKS
Streets and Highways
625,664
Snow and tee Removal
539,770
Street Signs
203,533
Traffic Signals
35,000
Street Lighting
36,400
Street Lights - Billed
216,000
Park & Recreation
1,185,338
Natural Resource Preservation
-
Recycling
135,120
Total Public Warks
2,351,161
OTHER
Miscellaneous 231,728
Youth Services 38.600
221,478 96% 221,478 281,728 258,577 92%
30.500 79% 35.242 .,32,600 2A,500_.__ 61
Total Expenditures $ 10,564,730 $ 10,014,451 95% 5 10,089,997 $ 11,003,788 S 10,412,120 95%
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) $ (688,155) $ 141,316 $ 65,770 $ (613,377) $ 431,974
629,262
101%
629,724
656237
685,873
105%
442,021
82%
442,077
563,587
446,827
79%
203,135
100%
204,494
204,193
167,256
82%
28,648
82%
30,169
35,000
23,978
69%
30,664
84%
30,664
36,400
37,089
102%
198,072
92%
201,501
217,500
197,084
91%
1,138,634
96%
1,151,313
1,257,247
1,237,498
-
0%
-
10.096
6,130
126,160
92%
128,038
130,927
123,706
94%
2,167,334
92%
2,817,980
3,111,187
2,925,441
94%
221,478 96% 221,478 281,728 258,577 92%
30.500 79% 35.242 .,32,600 2A,500_.__ 61
Total Expenditures $ 10,564,730 $ 10,014,451 95% 5 10,089,997 $ 11,003,788 S 10,412,120 95%
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) $ (688,155) $ 141,316 $ 65,770 $ (613,377) $ 431,974
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: December 2016 City Investments Review
DATE: January 24, 2017
INTRODUCTION
0
Summary reporting of the City Investment portfolio to the Governing body is a recommended
financial practice and often viewed positively by rating agencies.
Furthermore, the City of Andover Investment Policy recommends the Finance Director presents
to the City Council at least quarterly the type of investments held by the City.
DISCUSSION
Attached is the Investment Maturities Summary for December 2016, the December 2016
Investment Detail Report, and the December 2016 Money Market Funds Report. These
attachments are intended to assist with discussion when reviewing the December 2016
investments.
ACTION REQUESTED
Informational. The Council is requested to review and provide feedback to staff.
submitted,
Investment Maturities - December 2016
Investment Maturities (in Years)
Credit
Fair
Less Than
More Than
Investment Type
Rating
Value
1
1 -5
6-10
10
Money market funds
N/A
$ 2,524,371
$ 2,524,371
$
$
$
MN Municipal Money
Market Fund (4M)
N/A
5,002
5,002
-
-
-
Premier Banks Money
Market Fund
N/A
260,813
260,813
-
-
-
Certificates of deposit
FDIC
14,815,029
10,707,105
4,107,924
Local governments
A/Al/A2
954,149
380,503
409,968
59,754
103,925
AAI/AA2/AA3
7,637,783
1,678,746
4,198,212
1,250,655
510,171
AAA
3,617,344
407,330
2,829,099
380,915
-
-
219,818
-
State governments A/AI/A2 - - -
AAI/AA2/AA3 2,535,073 803,840 1,511,415
AAA
600,342
201,298
196,020
203,024
-
U.S. agencies
AAA
3,957,780
950,031
2,886,102
-
121,647
FNMA REMIC
N/A
3,329
-
3,329
U.S. agencies
N/A
1,454,494
717,992
736,502
-
Total investments
$ 38,365,509
$ 18,637,031
$ 16,878,570
$ 2,114,166
$ 735,743
Deposits
2,259,945
Total cash and investments
$ 40,625,454
December 2016 Investment Detail
Description
Cusp
Number
Credit
RatfnglF
DIC #
Type
Purchase
price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
Date
Acquired
Coupon
Date
Maturity/
Due Date
Beal Bk
07370T2G7
32574
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.600%
245,000.00 maturity
07/06/16
none
01/04/17
ZB NA
98878BDF2
2270
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.550%
244,997.55 maturity
08/09116
none
01/09/17
Georgia Bank & Trust
373128FV4
27574
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.600%
245,002.45 maturity
07/08/16
none
01/09/17
Sterling Bank of Poplar Bluff
85916VAW5
57813
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.600%
245,000.00 maturity
07/08116
none
01/09/17
Bank of India NY
06279HNB5
33648
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.600%
245,000.00 maturity
07118/16
none
01111117
Everbank
29976DN97
34775
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.600%
245,004.90 maturity
07114/16
none
01112/17
Discover Bk Greenwood Del
254672864
5649
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.600%
245,004.90 maturity
07/13/16
none
01/13/17
BMO Hams Bank NA
05581WHK4
16571
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.600%
244,985.30 maturity
07115116
none
01113/17
Whitney Bk New Orleans LA
966594AP8
12441
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
0.850%
247,061.75 maturity
01/271161
none
01/27/17
First Stale Community Bank
33708UBZ1
17323
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.500%
245,012.25 maturity
05/27/16
06/27/16
02127/17
Homestreet Bank
43785QHZ9
32489
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.500%
245,017.15 maturity
05127/16
06/27/16
02127117
City Nag Bk FL Miami
17801 DBPO
20234
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.550%
244,992.65 maturity
12/02/16
none
03/02/17
Citizens Bk PA Philadelphia
174170DA8
57282
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.550%
244,985.30 maturity
12/07116
none
03/07/17
Bank Baroda New York BRH
06062QYK4
33681
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.650%
245,026.95 maturity
12/09/16
none
03/09/17
Merchants Bank of Indiana
588493GY6
8056
CO
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.650%
245,024.50 maturity
12/16/16
none
03116/17
Metabank Storm Lake Iowa
59101LAF4
30776
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.550%
244,975.50 maturity
12/16/16
none
03/16/17
CIBM Bk Champaign III
12545JAJ4
11729
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.600%
244,992.65 maturity
12/22116
none
03/22117
Dallas Cap Bk NA
234553AK1
20727
CO
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.500%
244,936.30 maturity
245,012.25 maturity
12/23116
12128/16
12130/16
none
none
03123117
03129/17
Beal Bk USA Las Vegas NV
07370WF50
57833
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.650%
Luther Burbank Savings
TCM Bank
Amex Centurion Bank
CIT Bank NA
Bank of America
RBS Citizens NA Providence RI
550551BM6
32178
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.550%
244,951.00 maturity
none
03/30/17
872308CB5
02587DE61
12556LAA4
06051 VZY5
75524KFZ2
34535
CO
245,000.00
245,000.00
248,000.00
245,000.00
248,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.650%
0.900%
245,009.80 maturity
248,176.08 semi-annual
05/31/16
10/28/15
none
04/28/16
03/31/17
04128117
27471
58978
3510
CO
CD
248,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.650%
0.700%
245,041.65 maturity
245,029.40 maturity
05131/16
06/02116
none
none
05/31/17
06/02/17
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
57957
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.700%
244,985.30 maturity
12/07/16
none
06/07/17
State Bank India NY
856284565
33682
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.750%
245,031.85 maturity
12/12/16
none
06/12/17
Bank of Ruston LA
06427LBV6
29700
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.650%
244,919.15 maturity
12/14/16
none
06/14/17
Bank of China NY
06426TZ69
33653
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.700%
244,973.05 maturity
12115/16
none
06/15/17
Berkshire Bk Pittsfield MA
084601GP2
23621
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.750%
245,007.35 maturity
12/30/16
none
06/30/17
Patriot Bank NA
70337MAR9
33928
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.850%
245,129.85 maturity
12/30/16
none
06/30/17
Capital One NA
14042E4Q0
4297
CD
248,000.00
248,000.00
248,000.00
1.150%
248,290.16 semi-annual
07115/15
01115/16
07117117
Investors Savings Bank
46176PFF7
28892
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.650%
244,960.80 maturity
07/21/16
none
07/21117
Champlain Nall Bk Elizbt
158716AU4
7356
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.700%
244,875.05 maturity
12/29116
none
07128117
First Foundation Bank
32026UCN4
58647
CD
245,000.00
0.700%
244,706.00 maturity
12/16/16
none
09/15117
Bank Leumi USA
063248GF9
19842
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.850%
244,943.65 maturity
12122/16
none
09/22117
Mercantil CommerceBank
58733ADB2
22953
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.900%
244,867.70 semi-annual
07/12/16
12/29/16
09129117
Farmers & Merchants Svgs Bk
30856PAG1
9298
CD
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
1.050%
249,744.51 monthly
01122116
02122/16
10123117
Washington Trust Company
940637HU8
23623
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.750%
244,534.50 maturity
12/05/16
none
11117117
1 Year CD - Premier Bank
1091003210
21714
CD
251,504.10
251,504.10
251,504.10
0.700%
251,504.10 maturity
12/16/16
none
12/16117
1 Year CD - Premier Bank Rochester
2055214401
33202
CD
246,474.02
246,474.02
246,474.02
0.600%
246,474.02 maturity
12116/16
none
12116117
1 Year CD - Premier Bank MN
3041574901
33204
CD
246,474.02
246,474.02
246,474.02
0.600%
246,474.02 maturity
12/16/16
none
12/16/17
Valley Cent Svgs Bk Reading OH
91944RAE8
28555
CD
150,000.00
150,000.00
150,000.00
1.250%
150,33fi.00 monthly
12 22/14
01122 15
1222117
December 2016 Investment Detail
Description
Cusip
Number
Credit
Rating/F
DIC #
Type
Purchase
Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
Interest Paid
Date
Acquired
Coupon
Date
Maturity/
Due Date
Safra National Bk
BankUnited NA
78658QD59
26876
58979
CD
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
1.000%
244,933.85
maturity
12/29/16
none
12/28/17
066519CT4
245,000.00
1.100%
245,173.95
maturity
12/29/16
none
12/29/17
North Carolina Eastn Mun Pwr
658196U24
A3
local
323,218.40
323,218.40
310,000.00
6.217%
310,043.40
semi-annual
03/16/16
07101/08
01/01/17
Kaufman TX
4862061KK0
_
A3
local
61,128.00
61,128.00
60,000.00
4.000%
60,189.00
semi-annual
06/28/16
none
02/15/17
Augusta ME
051411ND4
A3
local
11,250.00
11,250.00
10,000.00
5.250%
10,270.20
semi-annual
03/07112
none
10/01/17
North Mankato MN Pori Auth Com
660760AG4
AA
local
107,657.00
107,657.00
100,000.00
4.000%
100,193.00
semiannual
09/20/13
none
02/01/17
Philadelphia PA Auth Zero Coupon
71781LBJ7
AA
local
161,700.00
161,700.00
245,000.00
244,046.95
maturity
01/12/10
none
04/15/17
Osseo MN ISD #279
688443J27
AA1
local
30,103.25
30,103.25
25,000.00
6.000%
25,102.75
semi-annual
12/22/11
none
02/01/17
McKinney TX
581646Y91
AA1
local
126,856.25
126,856.25
125,000.00
1.472%
125,195.00
semi-annual
05/20/15
none
08115117
Dane County Wl
236091M92
AA1
local
106,487.00
106,487.00
100,000.00
2.450%
100,946.00
semi-annual
07/16/12
none
12/01/17
Buffalo MN ISO #877
119655PS1
AA2__
local
264,250.00
264,250.00
250,000.00
4.050°k
250,630.00
semi-annual
03/10/15
none
02/01/17
Waterloo IA
941647KE8
AA2
local
105,594.00
105,594.00
254,312.50
100,000.00
3.500%
100,885.00
semi-annual
02/24/15
07/12/16
05/14115
none
06101/17
Reg[ Transprin Dist Denver
759136RR7
AA2
local
254,312.50
250,000.00
2.000%
251,177.50
semi-annual
11/01/13
11/01/17
Prior Lake MN
742617CB7
AA2
local
230,000.00
230,000.00
230,000.00
1.000%
229,346.80
semi-annual
12115/15
12/15/17
Tucson AZ
898711033
56516PNY5
AA3 _
AAA
AAA _
AAA _
AA1
_AAA_
AAA
AAA
AAA
AAA
AAA
local
254,202.50
254,202.50
230,520.40
250,000.00
2.139%
2.000%
251,222.50
220,145.20
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
12/09115
none
07/01/17
_
Maple Grove MN
local
local
230,520.40
220,000.00
01/10113
08/12/14
06/01109
07/05/16
10/26/11
03/21/16
12109/15
11104/13
12108115
08/01113
02/01/15
01/18/08
none
02/01/12
02/01/17
_
Ramsey Cnty AN
751622JG7
100,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
1.130%
99,988.00
02/01/17
Tennessee Valley Auth
880591 EA6
664129F92
880541OM2
local
93,153.11
93,153.11
85,000.00
5.500%
0%
87,197.25
803,840.00
201,298.00
200,100.00
200,022.00
100,079.00
199,802.00
250,027.50
297,714.00
198,466.00
07118117
_
Minnesota St
stale
state
US
US
US
US
US
US
811,520.00
201,894.00
811,520.00
201,894.00
200,584,00
200.000.00
99,647.00
199,800.00
251,187.50
295,932.00
200,000.006%
200,000.000%
800,000.00[0.790%
200,000.000%
100,000.000%
200,000.00
08/01117
08/01/17
02/03/17
02/06/17
06/08/17
09/18/17
_ _
Tennessee State
Farmer Mae
Fed Farm Credit Bank
Fed Farm Credit Bank
Fed Farm Credit Bank
FedHomeLnBank
FICO Ship Prin Zero Coupon
31315PZV4
3133EE6A3
3133EATE8
3133ECA95
3130A15P9
31T71KAC1
200,584.00
200,000.00
99,647.00
199,800.00
08/03/12
02/06/16
semi-annual
12/08/12
03118/13
semi-annual
251,187.50
250,000.000%
semi-annual
maturity
maturity
07/08116
10/23/15
03/16/15
none
09/26/17
295,932.00
300,000.00
200,000.00
none
none
10/06/17
10/06117
FICO Ship Pm -4 Zero Coupon
31771EAD3
US
194,572.00
194,572.00
FICO Ship Cpn-E Zero Coupon
31771JXM7
US
215,452.16
215,452.16
224,000.00
_
221,811.52
maturity
12/11114
none
11/02/17
87164DHW3
873
15,846,843.71
245,000.00
1.000%
245,051.45
semi-annual
12105116
Synovus Bank
CD
244,999.78
244,999.78
none
04/13/18
Key Bank National Association
49306SWO5
17534
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.850%
244,353.20
semi-annual
07/13/16
01113117
07/13/18
Capital One Bank (USA
140420ZQB
33954
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
0.900%
244,169.45
semi-annual
07/13/16
01/13117
07/13/18
BMW Bank of North America
05580ADR2
35141
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
1.600%
246,136.80
semi-annual
01/22/16
07W16
01/22/19
Ally Bank Midvale Utah
02006LF32
57803
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
1.200%
243,321.75
semi-annual
06/30/16
12/30/16
07/01/19
Barclays Bank
06740KHB6
57203
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.050%
250,255.46
semi-annual
07/03/14
01/02/15
07/02/19
Synchrony Bank
87164WBT4
27314
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.050%
250,191.24
semi-annual
07/11/14
01/11/15
07/11/19
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
48125Y51.4
628
CD
245,000.00
245,000.00
245,000.00
1.100%
243,003.25
quarterly
07/15/16
10/15/16
07115/19
PrivateBank&Trust Co
74267GUQB
33306
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.000%
250,191.24
semi-annual
07121/14
01/21/15
07122/19
Goldman Sachs Bank USA
38147JU59
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.050%
249,941.77
semi-annual
07/23/14
01/23115
07/23/19
First Federal Svgs Bk
32021YCH4CD
A29690
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
1.500%
252,371.46
monthly
01121/16
02121/16
08/21/19
Victory Bank
92644LABBCD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.000%
250,159.13
semi-annual
09124/14
03/24/15
09/24/19
10,707,105.14 CD
2,466,578.55 local
1,005,138.00 state
1,668,022.02 US
Less Than 1 Year
December 2016 Investment Detail
Description
Cusip
Number
Credit
RatinglF
DIC #
Type
Purchase
Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
Interest Paid
Date
Acquired
Coupon
Date
Maturity)
Due Date
Third Federal Sav & Loan
Celtic Bank
88413QAWB
15118RJMO
30012
57056
CD
128,000.00
128,000.00
128,000.00
2.000%
129,976.32
semi-annual
11/24/14
12/20/13
05/24/15
06/20/14
11/25/19
12/20/19
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
2.050%
251,885.66
semi-annual
Steams Bank NA
857894PB9
10988
CD
247,000.00
247,000.00
247,000.00
1.000%
2.000%
2.100%
250,880.37
253,703.61
semi-annual
12/26/14
06126/15
12/26/19
Citizens Alliance Bank
17318LAP9
1402
CD
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
monthly
06/27/14
07/27/14
06/26/20
Enerbank USA
29266NA31
57293
CD
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
252,331.62
monthly
07/18/14
08/18/14
07/20/20
Elbow Lake MN
284281KC5
A
heal
170,045.70
170,045.70
165,000.00
2.750%
168,898.95
semiannual
12/08/14
none
12/01/19
Oneida County NY
6824543R2
Al
local
68,632.80
68,632.80
60,000.00
6.250%
63,187.80
semi-annual
08/16/10
none
04/15/19
_
Junction City Kansas
481502F72
A2
local
101,558.00
101,558.00
100,000.00
5.500%
106,157.00
semi-annual
05/28/08
03/01/09
09/01/18
Kaufman TX
486206KL8
A3
local
72,922.50
72,922.50
70,000.00
4.000%
71,724.10
semi-annual
06/28/16
02/15/17
02/15/18
_
Farmington MN
311297W84
AA
local
102,787.00
102,787.00
100,000.00
2.000%
4.400°k
101,390.00
semi-annual
07/06/16
03/07/12
none
none
02/01/19
02/01/19
Rice Cnty MN
762698GK8
_
AA
local
45,466.80
45,488.80
40,000.00
42,316.40
semi-annual
Racine WI
7500216D4
AA-
local
101,792.00
101,792.00
100,000.00
2.100%
100,806.00
semi-annual
01/24/12
06/01/12
06/01/18
Indiana St Bond Bank
454624540
AA+
local
146,123.60
146,123.60
140,000.00
4.302%
145,097.40
semi-annual
12/30/16
none
08/01/18
_
MinnebisteMN
Ramsey MN
Rothsay MN ISD #850
604229KE3
_
AA-
AA-
AA+
AA+
AA+
local
10,000.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
2.450%
4.500%
3.000%
4.500%
10,008.20
semi-annual
10/10/13
08/01/14
02/01/19
751813PB6
local
158.677.85
158,677.85
145,000.00
145,366.85
203,595.60
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
02/16/12
07/06/16
04/17/13
10/10/13
07/09/13
03/04/14
10/31/12
03/27/12
04/01/16
04/01/19
02/01/20
778731AZ2
local
208,640.25
208,640.25
195,000.00
none
none
08/01/14
none
none
_
Steams Co MN
857896MH4
local
276,875.00
276,875.00
250,000.00
252,442.50
06/01/20
02/01/21
03/15/21
03I01I78
06/01/18
MinnefistaMN
604229KG8
local
161,038.40
161,038.40
160,000.00
3.100%
160,132.80
Greenway MN ISD #31
Minneapolis MN
Scott County IA
King Cnty WA
Minneapolis MN
Cedar Rapids lA
Minneapolis MN_
Hampton VA _
Middleton WI _ _
39678LDF6
AA+
local
27,593.50
27,593.50
220,938.00
25,000.00
200,000.00
5.000%
4.000°h
4.400%
3.980%
3.250%
3.000%
3.500%
2.209%
3.750%
26,615.00
206,418.00
102,929.00
208,844.00
103,713.00
206,360.00
262,675.00
100,324.00
103,146.00
60374YF93
809486EZ2
4947401.5
60374YS73
150528RMI
60374YSBI
4095582JI
AAi
local
Z20,938.00
AA1
AA1
AA1
AA1
AA1
AA1
local
local
local
local
local
local
114,450.33
224,634.00
111,898.00
217,672.00
112,617.00
224,634.00
111,898.00
217,672.00
278,632.50
100,836.00
100,000.00
200,000.00
100.000.00
200,000.00
250,000.00
12/01/12
none
12/01/18
semi-annual
06/05/12
06/11/13
12/01/11
12/01/18
semi-annual
12/01/13
06/01/19
278,632.50
semi-annual
02/26/13
01/20/16
02/24/15
none
12/01/19
100,836.00
100,000.00
semi-annual
semi-annual
none
none
04/01/20
09/01/20
596782RX2
AA1
AA1 _
AA2
AA2
local
local
106,979.00
106,979.00
50,606.00
100,000.00
50,000.00
Des Moines IA Area Cmnty, Col
2500971-121
50,606.00
2.450%
50,885.00
semi-annual
11/10/14
12/01/14
06/01/21
Hopkins Minn ISD#270
439881HCO
local
local
95,278.40
95,278.40
80,000.00
5.250%
83,204.00
semi-annual
04/30/12
08/01/09
02/01/18
Orono MN ISD#278
687136LA7
115,511.00
115,511.00
110,000.00
4.000%
113,469.40
semi-annual
08/04/16
02/01/17
02/01/18
Orange Beach ALA
68406PHF1
AA2
local
241.689.60
241,689.60
240,000.00
4.400%
248,858.40
semi-annual
08/05/10
02101/11
02/01/19
Sioux City A_ _
Waterloo IA
829458FC7
AA2
AA2
AA2
local
156,100.50
156,100.50
155,000.00
2.000%
156,267.90
semi-annual
12/22/16
06/27/13
08/16/11
none
06/01/19
941647PA1
local
local
50,559.50
50,559.50
100,000.00
50,000.00
100,000.00
2.000%
50,369.50
semi-annual
12/01113
06/01/19
Western Lake Superior MN
958522WU4
100,000.00
3.150%
103,335.00
semi-annual
04/01/12
10/01/19
Portsmouth VA
73723RSLB
AA2
local
286,268.00
288.268.00
295,000.00
2.400%
297.728.75
semi-annual
07/17/13
02/01/14
02/01/20
Brunswick Cnty
117D61VH1
AA2
local
108,967.10
108,967.10
110,000.00
1.740%
109,162.90
semi-annual
08/21/15
none
05/01/20
Kane McHenry Cook & De Kalb Zero Cpn
484080MB9
AA3
local
157,328.00
157,328.00
200,000.00
191,756.00
maturity
07/16/12
none
12/01/18
Moorhead MN _
6161412R7
AA3
local
108,820.00
108,820.00
100,000.00
3.800%
100,618.00
semi-annual
11/14/11
none
02/01/20
Davenport Iowa
238388GS5
AA3
local
111,948.00
111,948.00
100,000.00
4.650%
101,195.00
semi-annual
09/13/11
none
06/01/20
Whitewater Wis
966204KA6
AA3
local
109,541.00
109,541.00
100,000.00
4.850%1
3.750%
109,182.00
semi-annual
06/09/11
none
12/01/20
Washington County MN
937791KL4
AAA
local
115,000.00
115,000.00
115,000.00
116,529.50
semi-annual
07/01/10
01/01111
01/01/18
Saint Louis Park MN
791740WC3
AAA
local
112,114.00
112,114.00
100,000.00
3.850%
102,568.00
semi-annual
12/22/11
none
02/01/18
4,107,923.78 CD
December 2016 Investment Detail
Description
Cusip
Number
Credit
RDIC #F
DIC #
Type
Purchase
Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
tnterestPaidd
Coupon
Date
Maturity)
Due Date
Bandem TX ISD
Brownsville TX ISD Zero Coupon_
059851HR9
116421E46
AAA
AAA
local
local
154,890.00
154,890.00
150,000.00
4.000%
154,849.50
semi-annual6
none
02/15/18
229,640.00
229,640.00
250,000.00
243,905.00
maturity
3
none_
08/15/18
Minnetonka MN ISD #276
6D4195RA7
AAA
local
37,43320
37,433.20
35,000.00
3.100%
35,803.60
semi-annual1
t5111
none
02/01/19
Palm Beach Cnty FLA
696497TR7
AAA
local
256,504.60
258,504.60
220,000.00
5.898%
232,949.20
semi-annual1
none
06/01/19
Tenn Val Auth Cpn Strip Zero Cpn
88059EWZ3
AAA
local
262,890.00
262,890.00
300,000.00
286,197.00
maturity
13
none
06/15/19
Norwalk Conn
668844DS9
AAA
local
122,464.80
122,464.80
120,000.00
4.050%
124,563.60
semi-annual10
06101111
08/01/19
Greensboro NC
39546OV21
AAA
local
366,832.80
366,832.80
360,000.00
3.263%
372,110.40
semi-annual11
none
10/01/19
Saint Paul MN Port Auth
793028WS6
AAA
local
201,806.00
201,806.00
200,000.00
2.000%
201,488.00
semi-annual
12/22/16
08101/17
02/01/20
Woodbury MN
97913PCO7
AAA
local
123,037.35
123,037.35
115,000.00
3.250%
116,958.45
semi-annual
12/22/11
none
02/01/20
Dallas TX Indpt Sch Dist
235308QK2
AAA
local
116,900.00
116,900.00
263,970.00
100,000.00
300,000.00
4.450%
108,219.00
semi-annual
04/16/12
08/15/11
02/15/20
Tenn Valley Auth Zero Cpn
88059EHD9
_AAA
local
263,970.00
281,004.00
maturity
03111/13
none
05/01/20
Tenn Val Auth Cpn Strip Zero Cpn
88059EMX9
AAA
local
88,133.00
88,133.00
100,000.00
92,422.00
maturity
03/18/13
none
07/15/20
McAllen TX Dev Corp
579086AW9
AAA
local
175,000.00
175,000.00
175,000.00
1.400%
171,031.00
49,744.00
semi-annual
semi-annual
07/26116
02/15/17
08/15/20
Baltimore Cnty MD
05914FME7
AAA
local
51,290.00
51,290.00
50,000.00
2.097%
08/31/16
none
08101/21
New York St Mtge Agy
64988RHGO
AAA
local
100,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
2.375%
2.133%
99,020.00
semi-annual
10/27/15
04/01/16
10101/21
Columbus OH
199492CS6
AAA
local
39,956.40
39,956.40
40,000.00
39,736.40
semi-annual
02120115
none
12101/21
Washington State
939758DL9
57582P2T6
AA
AA1
state
state
205,804.00
199,744.00
205,804.00
199,744.00
200,000.00
200,000.00
4.500%
2.090%
1.789%
1.939%
1.877%
2.995%
2.000%
3.517%
2.970%
2.894%
3.178%
207,598.00
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
semi-annual
01/24112
12/17/14
12/09/15
12109/15
04/01/12
11/01/14
07/01/16
07/01/16
none
10/01/18
05/01/20
01/01/18
07/01/18
04/15/18
07/01/20
_
MassachusetlS State
200,728.00
215,657.90
New Hampshire St Hsg
64469DWUl
AA2
AA2
AA3
AA3
AA3
AA3
_state
slate
state
slate
slate
state
_state
state
state
215,819.15
120,715.20
182,743.20
279,439.80
100,000.00
214,954.00
26,742.50
215,819.15
120,715.20
182,743.20
279,439.80
100,000.00
214,954.00
26,742.50
103,089.00
48,218.85
215,000.00
120,000.00
180,000.00
270,000.00
100,000.00
200,000.00
New Hampshire St Hsg _ _ _
Kansas St Dev Fin Auth
Florida St Hurricane
Minnesota St Colleges 8 Univ
Connecticut Slate
Georgia State
Texas Stale
64469DWV9
485429X90
34074GDH4
60414FPJ3
20772JON5
373384RQ1
882722,151
120,637.20
180,408.60
276,463.80
99,443.00
210,478.00
25,674.75
07/12/16
11/10/15
02/26/15
07/01/13
10/01/15
10/01/20
05/27/16
02/15114
08/15/21
_
AAA
25,000.00
100,000.00
45,000.00
semi-annual
02/08/12
08/10/11
none
04/01/12
10/01/18
10/01/18
AAA
103,089.00
48,218.85
102,620.00
46,748.70
semi-annual
semi-annual
Tennessee State
880541003
AAA
08/30/16
02/01/12
08/01/20
Virginia State
928109XD4
AAA
state
22,126.00
22,126.00
20,000.00
4.100%
20,976.80
semi-annual
02/07/12
none
06/01/21
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EFJMO
AAA
US
249,750.00
249,750.00
250,000.00
0.930%
248,335.00
semi-annual
05/25/16
04/13/16
04113/18
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Med Tenn Note
3134G3ZK9
AAA
US
200,000.00
200,000.00
200,000.00
1.200%
199,954.00
semi-annual
07130/12
01/30/13
07/30/18
Fed Farm Credit Bank
31331Y4S6
AAA
US
114,000.00
114,000.00
100,000.00
5.050%
105,878.00
semi-annual
semi-annual
09111/13
none
08/01/18
Fed Nag Mtg Assn
3136GOY70
AAA
US
199,300.00
199,300.00
200,000.00
1.080%
199,290.00
10/30/12
01/30/13
01/30/19
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EC5NO
AAA
US
99,587.00
99,587.00
100,000.00
1.250%
99,415.00
semi-annual
01/07/13
03/04/13
03104/19
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Med Tern Note
3134G96U6
AAA
US
200,000.00
200,000.00
200,000.00
1.060%1
197,364.00
quarterly
08/23/16
11/23/16
08/23/19
_
RFCSP Strip Principal Zero Coupon
76116FAA5
AAA
US
185,568.00
185,568.00
200,000.00
191,776.00
maturity
07/22/15
none
10/15/19
Fed Farm Credit Bank
3133EGBKO
AAA
US
199,600.00
199,600.00
200,000.00
1.300%
197,004.00
semi-annual
05/25/16
11/25116
11/25119
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp Zero Cpn
31340OBV4
AAA
US
950,527.00
950,527.00
1,000,000.00
949,050.00
maturity
11/02/15
none
11/29/19
Fed Nag Mtg Assn
3136G4KL6
AAA
US
200,000.00
200,000.00
200,000.00
1.700%
1.500%
1.850%
199,916.00
semi-annual
12/30/16
06/30117
12/30/19
Fed Home Ln Bank
313OA3XL3
AAA
US
99,500.00
99,500.00
100,000.00
100,008.00
198,112.00
semi-annual
07/22/15
08110115
02/10120
Fed Nall Mtg Assn
3136G4JM6
AAA
US
200,000.00
200,000.00
200,000.00
semi-annual
12/28/16
06/28/17
12/28/20
_
Fed Nall Mtg Assn Remic
31393EAL3
US
204,187.50
3,342.31
3,273.75
4.500%
3,328.78
monthly
07/30/03
none
08/25/18
FICO Strip Cpn Zero Coupon
31771 EAA9
US
529,947.00
529,947.00
550,000.00
540,314.50
maturity
06/09/14
none
05111/18
7,437,278.10 local
1,707,434.75 state
December 2016 Investment Detail
Description
Cusip
Number
Credit
Rating/F
DIC #
Type
Purchase
Price
Carrying Cost
Maturity
Amount
Interest
Rate
Current Market
Value
Date
Acquired
Coupon
Date
Maturity/
Due Date
Fed Home Ln Mtg Corp
31393VMQ1
US
153.656.25
2,029.34
93,140.00
1,981.05
4.500%
2,013.84
monthly
06/30/03
06/15/18
FICO Ship Cpn13 Zero Coupon
31771C2G9
US
93,140.00
100,000.00
97,418.00
maturity
12/29/14
none
12/27/18
FICO Strip Cpn Zero Coupon
31358BAA6
US
94,480.00
94,480.00
100,000.00
96,756.00
maturity
04/17/15
none
02101/19
16,878,569.75
Kaufman TX
486206KR5
A3
local
61,821.00
61,821.00
60,000.00
3,000%1
59,754.00
semi-annual
06/28/16
02/15/17
02/15/23
Chaska MN
161663653
AA
local
115,122.70
115,122.70
110,000.00
4.000%
113,306.60
semi-annual
09/08/14
none
02/01/24
Mitchell SD Sch Dist#17-2
606687EHO
AA
local
116,702.00
116,702.00
100,000.00
6.000%
107,516.00
semi-annual
12120/11
06/15/19
06/15/24
Minnetrista MN
604229KJ2
AA+
local
40,000.00
40,000.00
40,000.00
3.850%
40,040.40
semi-annual
10110/13
08/01/14
02/01/23
Savage Minn
80465PAN4
AA+
local
198,018.00
198,018.00
200,000.00
4.800%
206,002.00
semi-annual
06/17/10
02/01/11
02/01/24
Lake City Minn ISD #813
508084DW7
AA+
local
103,933.00
103,933.00
100,000.00
5.000%
103,985.00
semi-annual
05/11/11
none
02/01125
Minneapolis MN
60374YG68
AA1
local
110,419.00
110,419.00
100,000.00
4.700%
105,553.00
semi-annual
10/31/11
none
03/01/23
Minneapolis MN
60374YG76
AA1
local
72,201.35
72,201.35
65,000.00
4.800%
68,630.25
semi-annual
12/09/14
none
03/01/24
Alexandria MN ISD#206
015131LQ6
AA2
local
279,760.50
279,760.50
270,000.00
3.000%
276,075.00
semi-annual
01/21/15
none
02/01/23
Duluth MN
264438ZL9
AA2
local
29,767.20
29,767.20
30,000.00
2.625%
28,699.50
semi-annual
12/05/12
08/01/13
02/01/25
W Palm Beach FL
955116BE7
AA3
local
101,245.00
101,245.00
100,000.00
2.264%
97,611.00
semi-annual
07/05/16
10/01/16
10/01/22
Hawkins Cnty TN
420218PL7
AA3
local
111,480.00
111,480.00
100,000.00
4.800%
103,236.00
semi-annual
semi-annual
maturity
semi-annual
03/13/12
03/19/09
02/06/08
08/30/10
none
none
none
05/01/24
11/01125
01/01/26
Tennessee Valley Auth Ser E
880591CJ9
AAA
local
121,500.00
121,500.00
100,000.00
6.750%
130,915.00
Ice Deposit- National Sports Center
Florida St Dept Environmental
Georgia State
Itasca County_ Minn
Milaca Minn ISD #912
none
34160WUAO
37338422
465452GP9
598699NT9
AA3
AAA
A
local
state
state
local
250,000.00
217,800.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
217,800.00
200,000.00
6.206%
219,818.00
07101/10
07/01/22
204,444.00
105,024.00
204,444.00
200,000.00
2.780%
203,024.00
2,114,165.75
semi-annual
12/13/16
none
02/01/23
105,024.00
100,000.00
5.550%
103,925.00
semi-annual
07/12/11
none
02/01/28
AA+
local
106,941.00
106,941.00
100,000.00
5.650%
106,847.00
semi-annual
07/22/11
none
02/01/27
Van Buren Mich Public Schools
920729HD5
AA1
local
102,750.00
102,750.00
100,000.00
6.430%
108,979.00
semi-annual
07/17/09
11/01/09
05/01/29
Will County IL Cmmy Zero Coupon
969078QM9
AA2
local
159,000.00
159,000.00
500,000.00
294,345.00
maturity
08/25/09
none
11/01/27
Fed Farm Credit Bank
31331VLC8
AAA
US
106,030.45
106,030.45
100,000.00
5.250%
121,647.00
semi-annual
02/26/10
none
04/21/28
735,743.00
35,575,322.21
3,625,933.12 US
1- 5 Years
1,691,323.75 local
422,842.00 state
6 - 10 Years
614,096.00 local
121,647.00 US
10+ Years
INVESTMENT SCHEDULE - Money Market Funds
December 31, 2016
Description
Current Market
Value
YTD Interest
Wells FOO
1 Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund
1 $2,524,371.281
$254.09
4M
I 14M
1 1,894.741
2.22
4M PLUS
I 14M Plus
1 3,107.551
6.70
Premier Bank
I I Premier Bank Money Market
1 260,813.231____775.83
Grand Total Money Market Funds 1 $2,790,186.80 1$1,038.84
Updated. 1112/2017
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Mayor & Council Members
FROM: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Supplemental Agenda Items for January 24, 2017 City Council Meeting
DATE: January 24, 2017
The City Council is requested to receive the following supplemental information.
Item #3. Approve Tree Clearing Quotes/16-40, Smith's Green Acres Ditch Cleaning & 17-
18, South Access to Woodland Creek Wetland Restoration (Supplemental) -
Engineering
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755-5100
FAX (763) 755-8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT
DATE:
Mayor and Council Members
Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
David D. Berkowitz, Director of P it orks/City Engineer
Kameron Kytonen, Natural Resources
Approve Tree Clearing Quotes/16-40, Smith's Green Acres Ditch Cleaning &
17-18, South Access to Woodland Creek Wetland Restoration (Supplemental) -
Engineering
January 24, 2017
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is requested to receive quotes and award the tree clearing contract for the Smith's Green
Acres Ditch Cleaning and South Access to Woodland Creek Wetland Restoration projects.
DISCUSSION
The quotes were due by 10:00 am on Tuesday, January 24, 2017. Quotes received are as follows:
Contractor Quote Amount
YTS Companies, LLC $67,750.00
Precision Landscape and Tree, Inc. $95,900.00
This tree clearing portion of these projects have a final completion date of no later than June 2017.
BUDGETIMPACT
Tree clearing for the ditch would be funded through Storm Water Utility and funding for the Woodland
Creek Wetland Restoration access will be from funds generated from real state transactions which are
within the Building Fund.
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is requested to award the contract to YTS Companies, LLC in the amount of $67,750.00
for Project 16-40, Smith's Green Acres Ditch Cleaning and 17-18, South Access to Woodland Creek
Wetland Restoration.
Respectfully submitted,
/'Kameron Kytonen.
Attachments: Received Proposals
PROPOSAL
Smith Green Acres Ditch Cleaning (Project #16-40) and South Access to Woodland Creek
Wetland Restoration (Project #17-18) Tree Clearing and Stump Grinding/Grubbing
(To be returned no later than 10 mn Tuesday, January 24, 2017)
Name of Company
City/State IZpy_rs Zip Code
Business Telephone tptZ - 331 - 1 t 3 3 Fax
Email Adress `I r-, -60 e u*C'C n. ( 6 V%n
Contact Person
Authorized
1-2-4-2o t'1
All equipment costs, disposal fees, and travel time to be included in the lump sum bid.
1. Lump sum for tree removal and disposal $
2. Lump sum for stump grinding and disposal $ 10 , o oG
3. Lump sum for grubbing and disposal
4. Total costs (sum of 1 and 2 or 1 and 3) $ V1,,
5. List all available equipment: (use additional sheet if necessary)
Minimum: 50 foot aerial lift truck, 12" chipper and clam truck.
6. Tree wood waste disposal site:
BIT'S -i2iro0lG.l.4v' :k .
PROPOSAL MUST BE SUBMITTED ON THIS FORM ONLY
City Authorized Signature Title Date
Commercial
Municipals
HOAs
lanuary 24, 2017
COMPANIES, LLC.
ro Whom It May Concern, City of Andover, Kameron Kytonen:
Residential
Utilities
Golf Courses
Below is YTS Companies, LLC submission of Bid for Smith Green Acres Ditch Cleaning (#16-40) and South Access to Woodland
Creek Wetland Restoration (#17-18) Tree Clearing and Stump Grinding/Grubbing.
Smith Green Acres Ditch Cleaning (#16-40)
YTS Companies, LLC submits a lump sum bid in the amount of $53,750.00 for ditch clearing, tree removal, debris removal and
stump grinding/grubbing. YTS Companies, LLC will removal all trees and shrubs in the marked easement, remove said trees and
brush and haul to YTS Companies, LLC tree disposal site in Brooklyn Park, MN. When all debris has been removed YTS Companies,
LLC will grind all stumps to a depth of no less than 12 inches below grade or remove the stump completely, whichever is deemed
practical by YTS Companies, LLC.
Exceptions
All trees marked to be "saved" will be given every possible effort to be saved and kept from harm, but no guarantee of
survivability is given. All Railroad Ties laying in the drainage ditch and used as a retaining wall will be left in place and not hauled
from site. If the City of Andover requests any Railroad Ties be removed from site, an additional fee will be access at a rate
approved by YTS Companies, LLC and the City of Andover. The Bridge installed by a private party over the drainage ditch will be
left in place without damage. Due to the bridge, all wood and debris west of the bridge will need to be hauled off site via the
ditch to Heather St.
South Access to Woodland Creek Wetland Restoration (#17-18) Tree Clearing and Stump Grinding/Grubbing
YTS Companies, LLC submits a lump sum bid in the amount of $14,000.00 for the tree clearing, debris removal and stump
grinding/grubbing of all trees and shrubs in the marked easement. All material will be hauled to YTS Companies, LLC tree disposal
site in Brooklyn Park, MN. All stumps will be ground to a depth of no less than 12 inches below grade, or remove the stump
completely, whichever is deemed practical by YTS Companies, LLC. YTS Companies will prune the large diameter bur oak as per
markings on the tree.
Page 1
BBB
14310 Northdale Blvd • Rogers, MN 55374 • 612. 331. 1133
Commercial Residential
Municipals ;` Utilities
NOA's Golf Courses
COMPANIES, LLC..
Exceptions
All trees marked to be "saved" will be given every possible effort to be saved and kept from harm, but no guarantee of
survivability is given. A wire fence and T posts are currently erected on site. This fence will be removed from the ground the full
extent of the marked easement but will not be removed from site, instead it will be piled on the cleared easement at the end of
the project.
A performance bond in the amount of $10,000.00 and a Certificate of Insurance naming the City of Andover as an "additional
insured" will be provide after award of the bid and prior to work beginning.
Thank you for the opportunity to work with the City of Andover.
Sincerely,
Mark Popovich
Contract Manager
14310 Northdale Blvd • Rogers, MN 55374 612. 331. 1133
PROPOSAL
Smith Green Acres Ditch Cleaning (Project #16-40) and South Access to Woodland Creek
Wetland Restoration (Project #17-18) Tree Clearing and Stump Grinding/Grubbing
(To be returned no later than 10 am Tuesday, January 24, 2017)
Name of Company
Address 50 ���� S . bwt 51. �, IVJ, E
L*t
City/State A AAA -1 Zip Code q5 -11S
Business Telephone IOJ �' Hifi- 211 (o Fax �� - 'f�L -iii 1
Email Adress - C 0
Contact Person
Authorized
1. Lump sum for tree removal and disposal
2. Lump sum for stump grinding and disposal
3. Lump sum for grubbing and disposal
4. Total costs (sum of 1 and 2 or 1 and 3)
t15.
Date oi-2Y-ao>7
$ oo
$ 30,00-0-00
$ 0"10 Q d
$
List all available equipment: (use additional sheet if necessary)
iimi m- 56 hint aerial lift truck. 12" chinner and clam truck.
6. Tree wood waste disposal site:
PROPOSAL MUST BE SUBMITTED ON THIS FORM ONLY
City Authorized Signature Title