HomeMy WebLinkAboutPWC - February 24, 2016C I T Y O F �
NDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 . WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
ANNUAL PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING
February 24, 2016
9:00 a.m.-1 1:00 a.m.
Public Works Building
1. Proposed State Aid Designation
2. Seal Coat Status
3. Update of Multi -Way Stop Signs
4. Traffic Zone Sign Update
5. Proposed 2017 CIP Projects
G: \Staff\RHONDAA \DAVE \Public Works\HgendaVO16 Annual Mtg.docu
1tLND0VER4"2Yw
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO:
Public Works Committee
DDB
CC:
David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public Works /City Engineer
FROM:
Jason Law, Asst. City Engineer
SUBJECT:
Proposed State Aid Designation
DATE:
February 24, 2016
INTRODUCTION
The Public Works Committee is requested to discuss potential changes to Municipal State Aid Streets
(MSAS) designations, and recommend which, if any, changes shall be brought forward to the City
Council for discussion /approval.
DISCUSSION
The City of Andover receives funding from MnDOT for construction and maintenance of MSAS routes.
These routes are designated and approved by the City Council and MnDOT. Only those segments
designated as MSAS can utilize this funding source for maintenance or improvement projects. Each
MSA city is allowed to designate up to twenty percent of their roadways as MSAS, providing they have
connections to County Roads, or other MSAS routes. The City currently has 42.75 miles designated as
MSAS, with an undesignated balance of 0.55 miles. If this excess mileage is not designated, the City
will not receive MSA funding for the remaining 0.55 miles available.
City staff is requesting the Public Works Committee consider designatingthe route through Grey Oaks
between Hanson Boulevard and Nightingale Street (155" Lane, Hummingbird Street, and 156'" Lane) as
as MSAS's. These segments are approximately 0.54 miles long. This is a route with considerable cut
through traffic between Hanson Boulevard and Nightingale Street, essentially functioning as a collector
street There are limited remaining options for designation of existing routes within the City.
BUDGETIMPACT
Designating the 0.55 miles of excess MSAS route will increase the funding the City receives annually
from MnDOT for MSAS route maintenance and construction. Funding is based upon a formula
including City population, Annual Daily Traffic (ADT) along the route, and length designated.
ACTION REQUIRED
The Public Works Committee is requested to review this information and make a recommendationto
designate 155" Lane NW, Hummingbird Street NW, and 156'" Lane NW in the Grey Oaks neighborhood
between Hanson Boulevard NW and Nightingale Street NW as an MSAS route.
ectful submitted,
Jason J. Law, P.E.
Assistant City Engineer
Attachment: Map '/
ANA„ „ E P Grey Oaks Potential MSAS Designation
,
r
8 r
fv
((' i Mav -.L
1
Lj 7 { bt SuaY r Si,G 3, J
`�- -'�. 'Iii" IIj
lit i t
T'- � �.-r'� ._ i Y IRt c° 'vf i I6 0,
—I. I'.
2� 7 �i _
15' 1 - ,
Date Created: February 16, 2016
Disclaimer. The provider makes no representation or warranties with respect to the reuse of this data.
Municipal Mileage
Revisions
During Municipal Mileage
2015 as of Dec. 31, 2014
Current Vear
+ or - as of Dec. 31, 2015
m
d
ANNUAL CERTIFICATION
>
OF MILEAGE _
E n
E
n
E
n
SEE INSTRUCTIONS INCLUDED ON WEB SITE !_a
C w
0=
RECORD REVISIONS ON BACK OF FORM Z W E
F
2 W
E
r Z W
E
SUBMIT TO YOUR DSAE BY JANUARY 16, 2016
yrn
"':II
MILEAGE
NOT
CONSIDERED
IN
THE COMPUTATION
OF BASIC MILEAGE
1. Trunk Highways
2 Trunk Highways Tumbacks
Dell naled As MM - mileage above 20%
3. County Stab Aid Highways
lExclude mileage designated as MBAS
Met,
33.90
33.90
33.90
4. County State AM Highway Turnbacks
(Designated as MBAs - miWge above 20%)
I+or -)
6. Total Mileage of Line 1 Thm 4 Previous =
33.90
Adjustment =
Cement = 33.90
BASIC
MILEAGE:
MILEAGE CONSIDERED
IN THE COMPUTATION
OF ALLOWABLE MILEAGE
Municipal Stab Aitl Street
(Exclude Trunk and County Highway Tumbacks
and Mileage Party Outside Me City Limits in a Ion WAS
city)
10.92
30.03
40M
0.00
0.00
0.00
10A2
30.03
40.95
7. County Read Tumbacks
(Designated as L1SAS)
1.80
1.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.80
1.80
B. County Roads
Exclude mileage designated as WAS
11.73
11.73
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.73
11.73
S. Other Local Roads And Street - not designated
(include T.H. & CSAH frorma a roads)
183M
183.46
0.00
0.00
0.68
0.68
184.14
184.14
µor -)
10. Total Improved Basic Mileage (arm 6 +7 +8 +9) Previous = 207.02 Adjustment= 0.68 Curren = 207.70
11. Percentage Limitation Allowed by Statute X 0.20
12. MAXIMUM MILEAGE ALLOWED FOR M.SAS. DESIGNATIONS (Col A. Line 10 Times Lim 11). 41.56
13. Total Municipal State Aid Street Designated (Colum XII, Lim 2 +4 +6 +7). 42.75
14. Total Mlles of T.H. S County Tumbacks designated as MSAS Above 20X (Col. XII Line 2 +4 +7). (-) 1.80
1S. Mileage designated WAS - not InelWing T.H. and County Tumback mileage (Line 13 minus Lim 14). (-) 40.96
18. MBAs Mileage Partly Outside Me City Limits in a non MBAs city (-1
17. Municipal State Aid Street Mileage OvedUnder Maximum Allowed. (Line 12 minus Tina 16 minus Line 16). 0.56
I Density car" Mottles total Improved Mileage (CWX. Line 5 +10) in Me Municipally of As of December 31, 2015 le Mlles.
Signed Title Date
(Shaded Fields contain formulas. These fields gel filled automatically as data Is entered.)
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923. WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Public Works Committee
FROM: David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT: Seal Coat Status
DATE: February 24, 2016
The Public Works Committee is requested to discuss the practice of seal coating the City's streets, Bud if
this maintenance technique should be used into the future.
DISCUSSION
Seal Coating is a maintenance technique that has been used since the mid 1970's in Andover in an attempt
to prolong the life of the City's street infrastructure. Within the past several years, wear course striping
(popping out of top layer of pavement— see attached pictures) has become a big problem state wide.
Several studies have been completed to try to determine what the exact cause of the problem is. The general
opinion of many in the engineering community, as well as those completing the studies is that the
widespread failures are related to roads being seal coated. The conclusion of the recently completed LRRB
study was chip seals have not resulted in an extension of pavement life, which contradicts what MnDOT has
been preaching for many years.
At the CEAM Conference in January, there was a session on this topic. Many Cities with the stripping issue
have considered or are stopping seal coating. Wear course striping is not typically seen on non -seal coated
roads. The City of Andover has one neighborhood that has never been seal coated, and there is no sign of
wear course striping in that neighborhood. Many other neighborhoods in Andover that have been seal
coated, especially those paved since the early to mid 90's, me having wear course striping issues.
The question is, should Andover continue seal coating of our streets? We spend approximately $600,000-
$800,000 per year on seal coating. The Engineering Department believes this money would be better used
on an annual overlay program, especially until the seal coat question gets sorted out. Seal coating could still
be used as a "band aid" for roadways that need to hold on a few more years until reconstruction projects
would take care of them.
BUDGETIMPACT
Andover annually spends $600,000 - $800,000 on seal coat projects. The majority of this money could be
better used in a more aggressive overlay program. Crack sealing of roadways would still be done; staff
believes there is a strong benefit to crack sealing. If seal coating is suspended, revisions to the fee schedule
for the Construction Seal Coat Fund would be needed, as we would no longer collect money from
developers for the first seal coat of a new neighborhood.
The Public Works Committee is requested to discuss if seal coating of the City's streets should
continue. If a recommendation is made, it would likely be implemented beginning in 2017.
pectful sub fitted,
anon J. aw, P.E.
Attachment: Pictures of pavement striping/
Jason Law
From: ceam- bounces@lists.state.mn.us on behalf of Eckles, Klayton [keckles@ci.woodbury.mn.us]
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 2:00 PM
To: ceam @lists.state.mn.us
Subject: [Ceam] Chipseal Stripping identification photos
Attachments: Level 1 Stripping Failure.jpg; Level Stripping Failure.jpg; Meadow Ln - Level 3
Failure_Page_03.JPG; Meadow Ln - Level 5 Failure_Page_05.JPG; ATT00001.bd
At the CEAM conference the session on Asphalt Stripping under Chipseals I offered to send photos to help folks identify
the early signs of a chipseal stripping failure. Attached are photos that show the cancer -like progression (first very
subtle, but leading to major failures)...
• level one shows itself as small dark spots of moisture wicking out of the pavement after a period of dampness (like
spring mornings).
• Level 2 is similar but it appears to have a spiderweb of moisture in cracks that are hardly visible when moisture isn't
present.
• Level 3 is shallow craters
• Level 5 is large patches.
• Level 6 is ... we need a new road and a new engineer
I suggest tht the problem might be more widespread than we think, as the early signs have been observed in many
places around the state. More research is needed to understand why this is happening... there are some indications that
the oil mixture or additives to the oil could be contributing. Until it is understood the question is ... Does chip sealing
lengthen or shorten the life of your pavement? Many agencies have discontinued chipseals.
The LRRB report on the topic is due out shortly. If you have any comments or observations about what you are seeing
with your chip seals I'd be interested in you sharing them with me now or after you've done some investigating of your
chipseals this spring, looking for those early signs.
Hope this is helpful!
Klayton Eckles
Engineering and Public Works Director
City of Woodbury
8301 Valley Creek Road Woodbrry, MN 55125
(651) 714- 35931 E -mail Notification Servi l View Matins Online I Mari
Ut2M
Z l r
ia I
Y,it S
w
dd ti'4��k+ <.Li <.T i��r�a�... x' i p�,,,dy A- "•a. Yiy
n
i\
rr
yty 4'y,
All
5�
0
0
4
L
0
Vi
M
k
I
I
,.r
!I
i
3
d
'lr
I
s
WN
DOVE
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 . WWW.ANDOVERMN.00V
TO:
Public Works Committee
CC:
a
David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public Works /City Engineer tv-3
FROM:
Todd J. Haas, Assistant Public Works Director
SUBJECT:
Update of Multi -Way Stop Signs
DATE:
February 24, 2016
INTRODUCTION
This item is an update as to the status of analyzing the remaining multi -way stop signs in Zone 2.
DISCUSSION
There are still a number of existing 3 way or 4 way stop sign locations that need to be evaluated by the City in
Zone 2. The locations are as follows:
A. Narcissus Street NW and Marigold Street NW (at Orchid Street NW) (3 -way).
B. Narcissus Street NW and Marigold Street NW (3 -way).
C. Poppy Street NW and 130 Avenue NW (3 -way).
D. 143rd Avenue NW and Xenia Street NW (3 -way). Note: Now that Banker Lake Blvd between 7'
Avenue NW (CSAH 7) and 38' Avenue has been completed, the intersection (which was planned to
be evaluated a few years ago but the City held off until the County project was completed) can be
studied now that traffic patterns are back to normal.
E. 1401h Avenue NW and Underclift Street NW (3 -way). Note: Now that Bunker Lake Blvd between 76
Avenue NW (CSAH 7) and 38a Avenue has been completed, the intersection (which was planned to
be evaluated a few years ago but the City held off until the County project was completed) can be
studied now that traffic patterns are back to normal.
F. 1386 Lane NW and Underclift Street NW (4 -way). Note: Now that Bunker Lake Blvd between 7a'
Avenue NW (CSAH 7) and 38'" Avenue has been completed, the intersection (which was planned to
be evaluated a few years ago but the City held off until the County project was completed) can be
studied now that traffic patterns are back to normal.
Traffic counts and accident data from the Anoka County Sheriffs Department will be used in the analysis for
each of these intersections to determine if they should remain a multi -way stop or not. The Minnesota Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices is used in guiding the City in the decision if they should remain multi -
way or not.
This is for discussion purposes only. No action is necessary as this time.
Respectfully /' d,
submitted, �,
Tod % ,/
Attachment: Location Map of Stop Signs (3 or 4 way); MMUTCD Multi -Way Stop Applications
7171 1_1
i
RlGll
T Rtl
R1 -10P
OPPION:
An EXCEPT RIGHT TURN (R1 -10P) plaque may be
mounted below the STOP sign if an engineering amity
determines that a special combination of geometry and
traffic volumes is present that makes it possible for right-
turning traffic on the approach to be permitted to enter the
intersection without stopping.
rveoax
The design and application of Stop Beacons are described
m Section 4L.5.
211.6 STOP Sign Applications
OIImANCR:
At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all
times, consideration should first be given to using less
restrictive measures such as YIELD signs (see Sections 2B.8
and 2B.9).
The use of STOP signs on the minor -street approaches
should be considered if engineering judgment indicates that
a stop is always required because of one or more of the
following conditions:
A.The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or
highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day;
B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop
in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on
the through street or highway; and/or
C. Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that
are susceptible to correction by the installation of a
STOP sign have been reported within a 12 -month
period, or that five or more such crashes have been
reported within a 2 -year period. Such crashes include
right -angle collisions involving road users on the
minor -street approach failing to yield the right -of -way
to traffic on the through street or highway.
suePORr.
In many low volume situations with no unusual history of
intersection crashes, no control at the intersections is a cost
effective strategy. Research suggests that at most
locations, increasing the level of intersection control will not
improve safety (see FHWA -RD-81 -084 Stop, Yield and No
Control at Intersections).
The use of STOP signs at guide crossings is described in
Sections 813.4 and 813.5.
�t!
2B-9
213.7 Multi -Way Stop Applications
SUPPORT.
Multi -way stop control can be useful as a safety measure
at intersections if certain traffic conditions exist. Safety
concerns associated with multi -way stops include
pedestrians, bicyclists, and all road users expecting other
road users to stop. Multi -way stop control is used where the
volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately
equal.
The restrictions on the use of STOP signs described in
Section 213.4 also apply to multi -way stop applications.
GDIDANQ:
The decision to install multi -way stop control should be
based on an engineering study.
The following criteria should be considered in the
engineering study for a multi -way STOP sign installation:
A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi -
way stop is an interim measure that can be installed
quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being
made for the installation of the traffic control signal.
B. Five or more reported crashes in a 12 -month period
that are susceptible to correction by a multi -way stop
installation. Such crashes include right -turn and lefl-
tum collisions as well as right -angle collisions.
C. Minimum volumes:
1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection
from the major street approaches (total of both
approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per how
for any 8 hours of an average day; and
2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle
volume entering the intersection from the minor
street approaches (total of both approaches)
averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8
hours, with an average delay to minor -street
vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle
during the highest how; but
1 If the 85th - percentile approach speed of the major -
street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum
vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the
values provided in Items 1 and 2.
D.Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where
Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent
of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded
from this condition.
December, 2011
Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering
study include:
A. The need to control left -turn conflicts;
B. The need to control vehicle /pedestrian conflicts near
locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;
C.Loentions where a road user, after stopping, cannot
see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the
intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also
required to step; and
D.An intersection of two residential neighborhood
collector (through) streets of similar design and
operating characteristics where multi -way stop
control would improve traffic operational characteris-
tics of the intersection.
2B.8 YIELD Sign (Rl -2)
YIELD
RI -2
The YIELD (RI-2) sign shall be a downward - pointing
equilateral triangle with a wide red border and the legend
YIELD in red on a white background.
SUPPORT
The YIELD sign assigns right-o -way to traffic on certain
approaches to an intersection. Vehicles controlled by a
YIELD sign need to slow down to a speed that is reasonable
for the existing conditions or stop when necessary to avoid
interfering with conflicting traffic.
2B.9 YIELD Sign Applications
OPTION:
YIELD signs may be installed:
A.On the approaches to a through street or highway
where conditions are such that a full stop is not always
required.
B. At the second crossroad of a divided highway, where
the median width at the intersection is 30 feet or
greater. In this case, a STOP or YIELD sign may be
installed at the entrance to the first roadway of a
divided highway, and a YIELD sign may be installed
at the entrance to the second roadway.
C. For a chaonelized tum lane that is separated from the
adjacent travel lanes by an island, even if the adjacent
Imes at the intersection are controlled by a highway
traffic control signal or by a STOP sign.
D.Ai an intersection where a special problem exists and
where engineering judgment indicates the problem to
be susceptible to correction by the use of the YIELD
sign.
E. Facing an entrance ramp onto a roadway, if
engineering judgment indicates that control is needed
because acceleration geometry and/or sight distance is
not adequate for merging traffic operation.
A YIELD (RI -2) sign shall be used to assign right -of -way
at the entrance to a roundabout. YIELD signs at roundabouts
shall be used to control the approach roadways and shall not
be used to control the circulatory roadway.
Other than for all of the approaches to a roundabout,
YIELD signs shall not be placed on all of the approaches to
an intersection. When a YIELD sign is used at an intersec-
tion other than a roundabout, at least one other approach
to an intersection shall remain uncontrolled.
2B.10 STOP Sign or YIELD Sign Placement
The STOP or YIELD sign shall be installed on the near
side of the intersection on the right -hand side of the
approach to which it applies. When the STOP or YIELD sign
is installed at this required location and the sign visibility is
restricted, a Stop Ahead sign (see Section 2C.36) shall be
installed in advance of the STOP sign or a Yield Ahead sign
(see Section 2C.36) shall be installed in advance of the
YIELD sign.
The STOP or YIELD sign shall be located as close as
practical to the intersection it regulates, while optimizing its
visibility to the road user it is intended to regulate.
STOP signs and YIELD signs shall not be mounted on the
same post.
No items other than inventory stickers, sign installation
dates, and bar codes shall be affixed to the fronts of STOP or
YIELD signs, and the placement of these items shall be in
the border of the sign.
No items other than official traffic control signs,
inventory stickers, sign installation dates, anti - vandalism
stickers, and bar codes shall be mounted on the backs of
STOP or YIELD signs.
No items other than mmoreflective strips (see Section
2A.21) or official traffic control signs shall be mounted on
the fronts or backs of STOP or YIELD signs supports.
December, 2011 2g-I0
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923. WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN. US
TO:
CC:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Public Works Committee
David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public Works /City Engineer
Todd J. Haas, Assistant Public Works Director
Traffic Zone Sign Update
February 24, 2016
This item is an update as to the status of analyzing the traffic signing in various zones throughout
the City.
DISCUSSION
As you know, the Public Works Street/Sign Department has been working on various zones
throughout the City updating signs and installing speed limit signs in the rural areas. The status
of the zones are as follows:
• Zone 2 — Traffic signing has been completed including the ID/engraving and collecting
GPS locations of the signs. Also the speed limit postings have been completed along with
the final inspection by Public Works.
• Zone 3 - Traffic signing has been completed including the ID /engraving and collecting
GPS locations of the signs. Also the speed limit postings have been completed along with
the final inspection by Public Works.
• Zone 4 - Traffic signing has been completed including the ID/engraving and collecting
GPS locations of the signs. Also the speed limit postings have been completed along with
the final inspection by Public Works.
• Zone 5 - Traffic signing have been completed including the ID/engraving and collecting
GPS locations of the signs. Also the speed limit postings have been completed along with
the final inspection by Public Works.
• Zone 6 — Traffic signing have been completed including the ID /engraving and collecting
GPS locations of the signs. Also the speed limit postings have been completed along with
the final inspection by Public Works.
• Zones 7 — Traffic signing plans will be completed this spring and some of the work has
already started replacing street name plates. Most of the work will be completed spring
through fall of this year.
Note: Zones 8, 9, and 1 will be done over the next 2 years. Zone 1 was completed back
in 1996 -1997 before the new Federal requirements were in effect and will need to be
reviewed again.
As required by the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MN MUTCD), it is
the responsibility of the City to ensure the signs are the proper type, placed in the proper location
and signs meet reflectivity standards.
This is for discussion only. No action is necessary as this is an update as to the status of traffic
signing program.
Respectfiilly submitted,
,
--itted
�/Y9
Todd J. Haas
Attachment: Zone map
WWI
■
i
N
�
err
JI
3
■'
i'i�
s
9v
..
■
,iii■.■ /'t
•�:.
:IIIJ
■
FE,
1psam,
=I
�i
i
u
■�J.
�•..
e�
4040, •
g,
mnnrnr
.....
�+■�.q'
:-4 �R�I
r sfA �R
", • - -1 � i�s
�
�:
a:a
?.i•yT.�11
..
I:ly�l�'
! i:::Cua11
"�
�1•
i:l/iiwV
■iji j 111
��.�1 :in�iiii
�aie ium�
L�Ix
�Lc
r•
/ "•IP.'
: .�♦
.a-
-. •f1
ITf.
.
■A1
rl.la...i_......:.......1111
.
II•�
♦�Ii•
,:
ai:e■:1
n1,
,..,
li
■Mee
�1� .Ir ■wli7i�� ■�
■�
■�
';7�''i�. eel °,I
�`��
#;9y
■II::�?�:�•1° MAP::
■C7r
T'�.fl■11l�11
.:�:
�I�
��v �I__.�.
■j� � �.-
..
!-
}:a:u:nn-
�111:;
``�ILi��
�1 -�� 11:1�`'1�4�Ir■
■�■
■I,Ir
mpolurall
IN
C 5. I T Y O F
ND OVE
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 . WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV
TO: Public Works Committee
FROM: David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public Works /City Engineer
SUBJECT: Proposed 2017 CIP Projects
DATE: February 24, 2016
Discuss the proposed Public Works related projects identified in the City's Capital Improvement
Plan (CIP) for construction in 2017.
DISCUSSION
Staff will soon begin the process of preparing the draft Capital Improvement Plan for 2017 -2021.
The Public Works Committee is requested to review the proposed projects that are identified on
the attached maps and discuss other possible CIP projects for 2017 to 2022.
ACTION REQUIRED
Discuss projects for the 2017 -2021 CIP for recommendation to the City Council.
ectfully submitted,
David D. B� w1�
Attachment: Identified 2017 CIP Project Maps
Location Map
L E G E N D
43 Project Location
G W
Lots /Parcels
to Park s
Water
Right of Way
City Limits 0 150 300 450
ox�mam aem.H�c� :mu��p��n�a��le�m�cia zoia w
"n�vER Capital Improvement Plan (207)
Pro %ect Name: TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS
ANDOVER BLVD FROM BLUEBIRD ST TO VALE ST
LL, LN
ti
F iy
rn y(,F
P
w
z m �A
< 145TH LN
U
L11 I I —J
45TH-E
N
�ANDO�,/ER.BLKD
144TH A pE
144THtiN
144TH AVE
r ~
m rn
iz
z
w
W
N
1
143RD-LN
X �
w
w
U
N
>
w
z
3
r a
" 3
� 0
J
143RD'AVE
J
N W
Location Map
L E G E N D
43 Project Location
G W
Lots /Parcels
to Park s
Water
Right of Way
City Limits 0 150 300 450
ox�mam aem.H�c� :mu��p��n�a��le�m�cia zoia w
"n�vER Capital Improvement Plan (207)
Pro %ect Name: TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS
ANDOVER BLVD FROM BLUEBIRD ST TO VALE ST
LL, LN
ti
F iy
rn y(,F
P
w
z m �A
< 145TH LN
U
L11 I I —J
45TH-E
• I' 1 1
I oink . sells) • •
Ming
MINI III ME
MEN ONE a
oil
now
7EGEND
Project Location
I CO Park
r'JI�
R
.,
.
-I
I.
City Limits
0 of,
Location Map
L E G E N D N
Project Location
W
Lots /Parcels
C3 Park
Water
Right of Way
City Limits o soo Soo soo
Feet
oa�mem aam. n:�crea3ia��9��maw�la =�naa_aws m.a
ivvovER Capital Improvement Plan (201 7)
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION
LUND'S EVERGREEN ESTATES 2ND -5TH ADDITIONS
E168TH-L N
r.
N
2
W N
K
Z
T67TH-CN �8I
w
I- f- 167TH AVE
N 2
N U
U' W
K
3
166TH AVE
9�
164TH---
N
Ff
2
N
J
�.
y
z
w
a
�
1647H -A�.E
s �g4TH�AV
3
�
10
s
163RD LN
Location Map
L E G E N D N
Project Location
W
Lots /Parcels
C3 Park
Water
Right of Way
City Limits o soo Soo soo
Feet
oa�mem aam. n:�crea3ia��9��maw�la =�naa_aws m.a
ivvovER Capital Improvement Plan (201 7)
Project Name: ANNUAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION
LUND'S EVERGREEN ESTATES 2ND -5TH ADDITIONS
E168TH-L N
r.
N
2
W N
K
Z
T67TH-CN �8I
w
I- f- 167TH AVE
N 2
N U
U' W
K
3
166TH AVE
9�
164TH---
"nbft
Capital Improvement Plan
(2017)
Project Name: STATE AID ROUTES RECONSTRUCTION
168TH LANE - CROCUST TO VERDIN)
170TH
UN
2
J
N
y
W
3
W
0
w
169TH
-LN
169TH -1—
t-
rn
y
7
U
O
K
U
f
y
z_
168TH LN
rc
-71,
yl
Z,
III
3'
167TH -EN
y
167TH AVE
y
�
F
y
U
2
O
K
U
N
f
A
M
z
0
Location Map
L
fyJ 1
E G E N
Project Location
Lots /Parcels
D
W
Park
s
Water
l
Right of Way
City Limits
0 200 400 600
eet
wwmem PSrc
Hncisaz�z�Enaireennawmlanc�aP mis.m.a
�VERI Capital Improvement Plan (2017)
Project Name: STATE AID ROUTES OVERLAY
UNIVERSITY AVE - 157TH TO 161ST
CON STANCE
BLVD
Io
O
K
2
W
0
IJ
O
a
F
N
K
2
A'
15y�
Location Map
L E G E N D H
Project Location
w
Lots /Parcels
Park s
Water
E�l Right of Way
City Limits o 250 500 750
Feet
Ncu meM PeM H \Gi5Ee1e1E nglreeNgVmjecISCIP ]f15 rtutl
Capital Improvement Plan
DOVER Project Name: INTERSECTION UPGRADES
3 LOCATIONS
L
E G E N D
Project Location
Lots /Parcels
CM
Park
Water
Right of Way
City Limits
N umant Path:
0 1,300 2,600 3,900
Feet