Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/10/2015 WorkshopANL6 Y O F 6VE 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting Agenda November 10, 2015 Andover City Hall Conference Rooms A & B 6.00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Discuss Accessory Dwelling Units 3. Other Business 4. Adjournment WAL, C I T Y • e-�, 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: David L. Carlberg, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Discuss Accessory Dwelling Units DATE: November 10, 2015 REQUEST The Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to continue discussing accessory dwelling units (ADU) and the provisions to allow them in the City of Andover. BACKGROUND The City Council discussed ADUs at their September 15, 2015 workshop and directed the Planning and Zoning Commission to explore ordinance provisions to allow them in the City. The Planning and Zoning Commission at their October 13`h meeting reviewed several other cities' provisions and determined that ADUs should be allowed in the rural parts of the City, yet highly restricted. Staff brought this direction back to the City Council on October 201h and the Council concurred with the Commission's recommendations and directed the Planning and Zoning Commission to proceed with drafting language and an ordinance amendment for their consideration. Staff has also been contacted by a resident interested in building an ADU who is also employed with the City of Minneapolis. They will be present at the meeting to review the City of Minneapolis' process in implementing regulations on ADUs and what they have learned from this process. Attachments September 15, 2015 City Council Workshop Staff Report September 15, 2015 City Council Workshop Minutes October 13, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session Staff Report October 13, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session Minutes October 20, 2015 City Council Staff Report October 20, 2015 City Council Workshop Minutes Respectfully Submitted, rL.� off. , a--� David L. Carlberg J r C T Y O E 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Mayor and Council Members CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator FROM: David L. Carlberg, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Discuss Accessory Dwelling Units DATE: September 15, 2015 RE UEST The City Council is requested to discuss and provide direction to staff on the City Council's desire to amend the City Code to allow accessory dwelling units. BACKGROUND There have been recent inquiries as well as articles in metro newspapers regarding accessory dwelling units often referred to as granny flats. Attached is a recent article that appeared in the StarTribune in August. Many cities are changing their codes to allow accessory dwelling units. Andover does not currently allow accessory dwelling units but does allow guest houses. The City allows guest houses in accordance with Section 12- 13 -14. The provisions are as follows: 12- 13 -14: GUESTHOUSES: A. Guesthouses, for purpose of this title, shall be an accessory building detached from the principal building where accommodations for sleeping are provided but no kitchen facilities are provided. The intended use is for persons visiting the occupants of the principal building and shall not be used as a rental property. (Amd. 4/18/06, Ord. 325A) B. Guesthouses shall be permitted in all residential districts, shall be located the required depth of the rear yard or more from the principal building, and shall conform to the side yard requirements for the principal building. (Amended Ord. 8,10-21-1970) 1 e ACTION If City Council is interested in a code change to allow accessory dwelling units, Council is asked to send this item to the Planning and Zoning Commission.- Attachments Article from Star Tribune dated August 14, 2015 Respectfully Submitted, David L. Carlberg a t 'Granny flats' may find a home in Inver Grove The City Council has given a preliminary OK to accessory dwelling units in single- family areas. By Todd Nelson Special to the Stv Tabun \I'Gl:ii t,. 2'.]5— II.;fiY \I e:Order Reprint Inver Grove Heights is considering joining other Twin Cities suburbs in allowing "granny flats" in single - family neighborhoods under certain conditions. "Granny flats," fonnally called accessory dwelling units, are second residences that homeowners can create as an addition to their houses or in a garage or other structure on their property. They typically enable seniors to live near family members but also can provide affordable housing to young singles and families. In Dakota County, cities that allow them include Eagan, Apple Valley, Lakeville and Farmington, according to Inver Grove Heights planning officials Inver Grove Heights' zoning code now allows only one dwelling unit — defined as living, bath and sleeping spaces and a kitchen — per lot in single - family areas. Residents can add living, bath and sleeping spaces to single - family homes but not a second kitchen, because that would constitute a second dwelling unit. An amendment to the city's zoning code that would let single - family homeowners add a second, accessory dwelling unit received unanimous City Council approval on Monday. A third and final vote could take place at the council's next meeting, on Aug. 24, if city staff completes research on council questions regarding possible rental of accessory dwelling units and occupancy by nonfamily members. Citywide approach The council is taking a citywide approach to regulating granny flats in response to a request from a resident. He and his wife want to convert the second floor of a detached, unused garage on their 2.7 -acre property into a full living space for their daughter and son -in -law. __ The_couple moved into his basement a couple of years ago, and the resident explained that _ he and his wife wanted to help them, while the younger couple would help them stay in their house longer. The amendment would allow detached accessory dwelling units only on lots that are at least 1 acre in size and that do not have municipal sewer and water service. The unit would have to use the same septic system and well as the principal residence. Skogh believes his existing septic system and well could serve the accessory unit proposed for his garage and meet other requirements of the amendment, City Planner Allan Hunting said. "There isn't anything so far that has made it impossible for them to meet the code requirements, at least as I understand it," Hunting said in an interview. Proposed requirements Further provisions of the amendment would require a granny flat to be 250 to 1,000 square feet and to house no more than three people. The unit would have to have at least two off - street parking spaces in addition to the one off -street space required for the primary residence. The property owner would have to live in the primary residence or the accessory unit. The unit the owner does not occupy would require a rental license. Owners would have to register their accessory dwelling units with the city. The units would have to be a subordinate part of a single- family home and the design would have to be similar to the primary residence and be compatible with surrounding homes. The city has received several inquiries about accessory units and proposals to include them in new homes or remodeling projects, but the current code required eliminating full kitchens planned in accessory spaces, Hunting stated in a report to the council. Some properties in the city may have unapproved granny flats, likely in homes built in the 1950s and 1960s that < , included full kitchens in their basements, according to discussion of the granny flat amendment before the city's planning commission. The number of such properties_ isn't known. In addition to the Dakota County cities that allow granny flats, other metro -area suburbs that have given the OK include Bloomington, Shoreview, Richfield, Roseville and Plymouth, according to the summary Hunting prepared. Richfield, Roseville and Farmington allow them in both homes and accessory structures, as Inver Grove Heights is considering, while Plymouth allows them only in accessory structures. EM Andover City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes — September 15, 201 S Page 2 Mr. Dickinson stated they could do some ponding on the land if they did road impro ments in the area. Mayor Trade stated she talked to Gretchen Sabel of the Open Sp/alot on who went out and looked at the property and stated there are a lot of trees but is ugh and they would not have chosen it for open space. The landlocked property is noll from what staff has told her. Mr. Haas indicated the property is landlocked an water on it. He thought it might have been ta x forfeit but did not designate it as p Mayor Trade asked if the second property actually added o the City stormwater management system. Mr. Haas stated there would be some costs to, survey work, an easement on the property, a description written on it if they wanted to ell the property. Mr. Dickinson stated there are nine parcels abutting the parcel. Mr. Haas tated the Park and Recreation Commission recommended both properties to be sold. Mayor rude did not think there would be any money from a sale, if anything it would cost the City ;Key. Mr. Haas stated they might get some tax revenue back if someone were to purchase t ,k6 parcels. Councilmember Bukkila stated the cost to do all of the work could be rolled into t purchase price of the parcels. Staff indicated that is correct. Consensus was to keep the parks akf assive parks. DISCUSS PARK SIGN ADVRRTISEMENT POLICY Mr. Haas explained the ity Council is requested to consider amending the Park Advertising Policy to allow basin es to advertise directly with the City in the parks and/or facilities. Mayor Tr/tught they needed to go back and find out why they originally made the agreemensociations. Mr. Haas stated it was done so the Associations could make money., Goodrich stated he is not s. The Council to al cta tons to continue handling the advertisement policy. DISCUSSACCESSORYDWELLING UNITS Mayor Trade stated this item came up at Night to Unite by someone who wanted to build a unit to allow their mother to live with them and stay independent. Mr. Carlberg explained the City Council is requested to discuss and provide direction to staff on the City Council's desire to amend the City Code to allow accessory dwelling units. Councilmember Knight thought if this issue is happening nationwide they should took at this. The Council concurred to have the Planning and Zoning Commission look at this. Councilmember Bukkila stated she would only want to allow this on larger parcels. ., Andover City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes — September-15, -2015 Page 3 Mayor Trude asked if the current city ordinances allow this type of structure. Mr. Carlberg stated they can have guest home type structures in the City but kitchens in them are not allowed. Councilmember Goodrich asked if there were any downfalls to allowing the accessory dwelling units. Mr. Carlberg stated there has not been enough research done on them as of yet. Councilmember Bukkila stated the concerns are how will people prove a familial relationship and what authority do they carry otherwise. She stated even if the original intent is for a family member, the situation is what will happen down the road. She stated this becomes a property rights issue and they need to look at the parking, congestion, impact to schools and use of services and roads. Mayor Trude stated when she looked at the City of Minneapolis code they had everything covered that Councilmember Bukkila mentioned and more. Mayor Trude thought it would be a good idea for the Planning and Zoning Commission to review this and find any issues with it that might come up for the Council to look at. Councilmember Bukkila stated as a tag along they will end up with a renter situation, they will need an eviction process along with possibly of more domestic issues. Mr. Carlberg stated it could be regulated by a rental license. Fire Chief Streich reviewed his personal situation and the requirements in his community. He stated with the cost of senior housing, many cannot afford it and it would break some people. Councilmember Knight asked if they could put an age limit on it. Mayor Trude stated the person who brought this up has a daughter who has special needs but wants to be independent. Councilmember Bukkila did not think it will happen in volume from the start but they do not want to be so narrow minded as to not look ahead to find out what could happen in thirty years. Mayor Trude thought the Planning and Zoning Commission should look at this and bring it forward to the City Council for discussion. Councilmember Bukkila stated she would like to review this item before it went to the Planning and Zoning Commission and see other city's ordinances regarding this. Councilmember Holthus thought it would be good for the Planning and Zoning Commission to look at this because they may have a different perspective of it. Councilmember Bukkila stated she would like to see more drafts from other cities before it would go to the Planning and Zoning Commission because if they are not comfortable, as a Council with the idea, she wondered if it is worth having the Planning and Zoning Commission spending time on it. She thought the Council could do the first blush with staff's help rather than give it to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Consensus of the Council was to have the Planning and Zoning Commission review this and bring it back to the Council before proceeding with a public hearing on the topic. 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 - _- FAXrt763Y755--8923 *- WWW.C"NDOVER.MN.US- - TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner SUBJECT: Discuss Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) DATE: October 13, 2015 INTRODUCTION At the September 15, 2015 City Council work session, Council discussed an article in the Star Tribune `Granny flats' may find a home in Inver Grove Heights. The article is attached for your review. Andover does not allow ADU's, defined as an accessory unit with cooking facilities, sanitary facilities and an independent means of access, attached to the single family dwelling unit/garage (attached or detached). However,. Andover does allow guesthouses, defined as an accessory building detached from the principal building where accommodation for sleeping is provided but no kitchen facility is provided. Since Andover does not allow ADU's, the City Council directed the Planning and Zoning Commission to research and discuss the option of allowing ADU's in the city. Staff researched other city codes mentioned in the article. The information is attached for your review. DISCUSSION Other City Requirements Through researching 9 communities mentioned in the article, staff determined most have similar /same code requirements. Commonalities include: • Allowed in urban districts • Square footage is limited • Property owner must reside on property • Can be attached or detached from the primary residence • Occupancy is limited • Off street parking provided • Provides full living facilities — kitchen, bathroom, bedroom «,lien Planning and Zoning Commission are discussing ADU's, staff suggests discussin- possible pros and cons associated with the changes. Some to consider may be the following: Pros Enables seniors to live near family members Provides affordable housing Provides supplemental income to property owner Cons T T._....- --- "- - A - - `L- - -_ -._, i - - V -` -- Does allowing 2 living units per parcel conflict with local zoning? ACTION REQUESTED The P &Z Commission is requested to cuss ADU's, the pros and cons -an , prove a staff an Council with direction regarding the possibility of allowing them within the City of Andover. Attachments Star Tribune Article `Granny flats' may find a home in Inver Grove Heights Research of City Codes R*esp l Sub 'tt d, SL. Hanson PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MEETING OCTOBER 13, 201 S The Workshop Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Daninger on October 13, 2015, 6:00 p.m., of the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners present: Chairperson Daninger, Commissioners Lynae Gudmundson, Bert Koehler, and Kyle Nemeth. Commissioners absent: Commissioner Tim Cleven, Steve Peterson and Jeff Sims. Also present: Community Development Director Dave Carlberg City Planner Stephanie Hanson Others DISCUSS ACCESSORY D 6VELLING UNITS Ms. Hanson stated at the September 15, 2015 City Council work session, Council discussed an article in the Star Tribune "Granny Flats" may find a new home in Inver Grove Heights. The City Council indicated they would like further review and discussion on these types of accessory dwellings from the Planning Commission and brought back to the City Council for further review. Mr. Carlberg reviewed with the Commission the discussion that happened at the September 15, 2015 City Council workshop meeting. Ms. Hanson stated in many of the cities they reviewed the ordinances were very similar. She stated Farmington allows them through CUP's but have never approved a CUP for one. Commissioner Koehler asked if Farmington has denied a CUP for one. Ms. Hanson indicated they have. Commissioner Koehler asked how many cars are allowed in driveways today in Andover. Ms. Hanson stated they do not have any requirement other than they need to park on hard surface. Commissioner Koehler stated he saw a handout that goes out to new residents that states "two cars per driveway ". Commissioner Nemeth stated he has seen that too. Chairperson Daninger thought that was a covenant for the neighborhood association. Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting Minutes — October 13, 2015 Page 2 Commissioner Koehler indicated this is on the City's website but he could not find it anywhere in the City Code. Mr. Carlberg indicated he would check into this. Mr. Carlberg stated the Commission should discuss where they would want to see these types of structures allowed in the City. Council discussed possibly allowing them in the rural areas where there is more room. Commissioner Nemeth asked if the structures would possibly overtax the city water and sewer systems. Commissioner Koehler stated he had the same concern and that other utilities such as gas and electric could be affected as well. He thought there needs to be a check on all of these things by all of the proper authorities. Mr. Carlberg stated if these would be allowed only in the rural areas they would not burden the city systems because they would be on private septic systems and wells. Chairperson Daninger asked how they would deal with these in an R -4 District. He thought there would be setback issues and other issues associated with it. Mr. Carlberg stated they could have a dwelling above the garage or in the basement of a home. Commissioner Gudmundson stated they would want to do CUP's on these because if they did not set any boundaries on what they could potentially build then their rural area is going to end up looking like Isanti County. She thought they would want to look at what they are proposing and building and thought they would like a permit placed on this. Mr. Carlberg stated they could put conditions on them. Commissioner Nemeth stated he would like to then have a sunset clause placed on these in case the property gets sold. Mr. Carlberg did not think that would work because of the cost associated with the building on the structures. Commissioner Koehler stated they would need to tie up the language enough that the new homeowner would be painted into certain conditions where they could use that dwelling so it would not have to be removed. He stated another concern he had was for other utilities such as electrical and natural gas. Chairperson Daninger did not think that would be enough of an issue because that is coming into developments where sewer is going as well. Commissioner Nemeth stated they just had Centerpoint Energy come in asking for more capacity for tanks. Commissioner Gudmundson thought a CUP would be needed in order to address all of the possible concerns and issues. Commissioner Koehler stated a CUP needs to have some guidance. Mr. Carlberg reviewed some of the other cities requirements where the structures are allowed with the Commission. Commissioner Koehler thought there needed to be some regulation around what residential zoning they will allow these on. Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting Minutes — October 13, 2015 Page 3 The Commission discussed where in the City the structures should be allowed and requirements needed. The Commission thought the best procedure for allowing these types of structures in the City would be with a CUP. Staff indicated they would bring this information forward to the City Council for further discussion. Ms. Nson stated at the September 9, 2015 work session, the Planning and Zoning Commis ' n discussed the intent of PUD's. During the discussion, it was suggested that staff provi a list for the Commission to reference when reviewing PUD's. Commissioner hler stated the idea of a list was not to come up with an exclusive all encompassing list b just something to get them thinking in the right direction. He thought they should h e a checklist of things the City wants to avoid when looking at a PUD. Commissioner Nemeth stated would like to add three items to the list. First one being "No item that requires City or As ciation maintenance ", such as roundabouts with center island plantings. The second e is related to parks and do they want to ask for a certain size of a park in a PUD. Mr. C berg stated the Park Commission has a City wide plan where parks are to be located. ey would not take a park with a PUD but open space could be preserved by allowing stering within the development. There was discussion about Homeowner Associa ' ns and PUD's. Mr. Carlberg stated in order to allow a homeowner ass iation in a PUD the PUD needs to be larger with enough units to support the HOA. He c d examples of failures such as Country Oaks West. Commissioner Nemeth stated he really liked having a developer arrative about compliance with the City Code, 13 -3 -11 and thought for the Comm ion this should be front and foremost. Addressing how are they complying and meeting ity requirements. He thought that needs to come from the developer in marketing their dev opment to the Commission. Chairperson Daninger stated the lists are nice and he likes the points discussed b no two PUD's are alike. He thought as they see more PUD's they will get better and peop get more experienced. He thought the list will help but as they see more of these come forward they will get more experienced and better. Commissioner Nemeth agreed with Commissioner Koehler that if they have a list, they will remember to ask questions. (ANDOVE^ 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Mayor and Councilmembers CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator Dave Carlberg, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) - Planning DATE: October 20, 2015 INTRODUCTION At the September 15, 2015 City Council work session, Council discussed an article in the Star Tribune `Granny flats' may find a home in Inver Grove Heights and gave the Planning and Zoning Commission (P & Z) direction to discuss the possibility of allowing ADU's within the City of Andover. DISCUSSION Andover does not allow ADU's, defined as an accessory unit with cooking facilities, sanitary facilities and an independent means of access, attached to the single family dwelling unit/garage (attached or detached). However, Andover does allow guesthouses, defined as an accessory building detached from the principal building where accommodation for sleeping is provided but no kitchen facility is provided. Since Andover does not allow ADU's, staff researched other city codes mentioned in the article. The information is attached for your review. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation At the October 13, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission work session, P & Z discussed and supported the possibility of allowing ADU's within the City of Andover. P & Z directed staff to assemble some of the most restrictive provisions for the other cities codes regulating ADU's. The following is a list to consider: • Allow as a CUP in the RI Single Familv Rural District • Requires a rental license from the City • Property owner must reside on the property • Maximum one bedroom • No more than two occupants • Minimum size of 500 sf and maximum size of 900 sf • 2 off street parking spaces to be provided • Can be attached or detached from the primary residence ACTION REQUESTED City Council is requested to discuss ADU's and provide P & Z and staff with direction regarding the possibility of allowing them within the City of Andover. Attachments _Research of City Codes Star Tribune article `Granny flats' may find home in Inver Grove Heights October 13, 2015 Draft P & Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Res ectful Subm' Stephanie L. Hanson Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) Definition A subordinate habitable dwelling unit. An accessory dwelling unit has cooking facilities, sanitary facilities and an independent means of access, attached to the single family dwelling unit/garage (attached or detached). Apple Valley Permitted accessory use Allowed in Zone 1 No more than 2 occupants provided 2 off street surface parking spaces exist Dwelling shall not exceed 900 sf Eagan Permitted accessory use Allowed in Estate District (16,000 so and R1 (12,000 so Property owner must reside in primary residence or ADU. Dwelling shall be no more than 960 sf or 33% of the primary residences footprint, whichever is less. An ADU shall not be less than 300 ft. Shall not contain no more than 2 bedrooms Must be located within or attached to the primary residence Must be connected to municipal sewer and water Elk River Permitted accessory use, need license from the Fire Chief and a rental license Property owner must reside on the property Dwelling size must be between 250 ft - 1,000 sf No more than 2 bedrooms No front yard entrance Can be attached or detached from the primary residence -- Farmineton — -- - Allowed with a conditional use permit Allowed in the Ag District, R2 (6,000 so and R5 (40,000 sf – 12 units /acre) Property owner must reside on the property Dwelling maximum size is 1,800 sf Lakeville Permitted with an Administrative Permit from the Zoning Administrator Must be attached to primary residence with an interior connection between to the 2 living quarters Must have municipal sewer and water available Must have 3 garage stalls attached to the residence No more than 2 occupants Minneapolis Permitted with an Administrative Permit from Zoning Administrator Can be internal to the principal structure, attached or detached Internal and attached – limited to 800 sf, no external stairs Detached – Limited to 1,000 sf, can have external stairs Property owner must reside on property Plymouth Allowed in the following districts: Rural (1 acre), urban 12,500 sf – 18,000 so Permitted with an Administrative Permit Must be located above an attached or detached garage Shall not exceed 1,000 sf or the gross floor area of the principal dwelling. whichever is less Property owner must reside on the property 2 off street parking spaces shall be provided - — - - - - -- - - Must be connected to municipal sewer and water - — - - - Richfield Permitted accessory use Can be attached or detached from the primary residence Shall be between 300 ft - 800 sf or the gross floor area of the principal dwelling, whichever is less A minimum of 3 off - street parking spaces is required in order to add an ADU of any kind Roseville Allowed in the LDR -1 District (11,000 sf- 12,500 so Allowed with a nontransferable ADU Occupancy Permit from the Community Development Department Property owner must reside on the property Shall be 300 sf - 650 sf, but in no case shall it exceed 75% of the principal dwellings four season living area Must provide 1 off- street parking space Occupancy is limited to 2 people Maximum of 1 bedroom Shoreview Allowed in Estate and Detached single family district Permitted with an Administrative Permit by the City Manager. Permit must be renewed upon the sale of the home Cannot be more than 30% of the buildings total floor area nor greater than 800 sf with a minimum of 500 sf of living space tMaximum 2 bedrooms Property owner must reside on the property No front entrances shall be added to the house to access the apartment I off - street parkin; spaces shall be provided, 2 of which must be enclosed 'Granny flats' may- find -a - home in =Inver -Grove Heights The Cihr Council has given a preliminary OK to a.cz >sory d.velling tin; IS in iirle- [ily ar;a;. 6k Tadd ?e6nV SFecul to .. 9 -,u Trwne e:OrdQ-r Reprint Inver Grove Heights is considering joining other Twin Cities suburbs in allowing "granny flats" in single- family neighborhoods tinder certain conditions. "Granny flats," formally called accessory dwelling units; are second residences that homeowners can create as an addition to their houses or in a Garage or other structure on their property. They typically enable seniors to live near family members but also can provide affordable housing to ,young singles and families. In Dakota County, cities that allow them include Earan, Apple Valley, Lakeville and Farmington, according to Inver Grove Heights planning officials. Inver Grove Heights' zoning code now allows only one dwelling unit — defined as living bath and sleeping spaces and a kitchen — per lot in single- family areas, Residents can add living, bath and sleeping spaces to single - family homes but not a second kitchen, because that would constitute a second dwetling unit. An amendment to the city's zoning code that %would let single - family homeowners add a second, accessory d:T, elti(Ig knit receit;ed unalunzous City Council approval on Monday. A third and final vote could take place at the council's next meeting, on Auca. 2i, if city staff C0111DIeteS r,-search on council questions regardln2 possthl. rental Of a cctssm -J dLae11' !touts gnu -up- 11-y h,- non_fa nllly nl',nlb -rs CitL id _ pro ch T!1-1 CU'_lil !1 Is t1�1f1 Cf L "'1C1 c I) hoacll tt) 1' yTlll'l llcr C fl!1nV Ila.ts In F-SpD11s2 to a 1N11_st 1!v121 c rl- a!J °_M, Fl-- .[1(l lllS 4 iP to Sucolld floor of I clalaCli--lL LleillycC garage on their 2.7 -acre property into a full living space for their daughter and son -in -law. The couple moved into his basement a couple of years ago, and the resident explained that he and his wife wanted to help theirs, while the younger couple would help them stay in their house longer. The arnendrnent would allow detached accessory dwelling units only on loth that are at least 1 acre in size and that do not have municipal sewer and water wervice. The unit would have to use the same septic system and well as the principal residence. Skogh believes his existing septic system and well could serve the accessory unit proposed for his garage and meet other requirements of the amendment, City Planner Allan Hunting said. "There isn't an%illing so far that has made it impossible for them to meet the cod-, requirements, at least as 1 understand it," Hunting said in an interview. Proposed requirements Further provisions of the amendment would require a grarmy flat to be 250 to 1,000 square feet and to house no more than three people. The unit would have to have at least two off- street parking spaces in addition to th-, one off - street space required for the primary residence. The prop -rL ovcaer would haVe to live in the primary resid-,nce or the accessory unit. The unit th:. ov, ner does not eccup Vti'o:rid require a rental license. Owners would have to resister the,' n- cessoj-� d%,,elting units % ith the cih,. Ttte units ��: ould have to be a subordinate part of a sink fanuly home end the dsign %-:�o�.rid hate to be similar to the p {l @�t r,�' Ce�rlrI1C c�n�l �1� col:pntl! -J =Ln lrn 1191h °j. l h� C!t ,.1u s to :u ri [iCir I[�ln12S or P'Fa -C�.�, bi_rt tl__ cilrler t Cod- 1;61.:-J ekntlr:ntln? tirli `V Jp : tu: 'r 1 12 tl If `i, r,lpi ll. Scw� 1? p:"o;)..r!.r'� IIl included full kitchens in their basements, according to discussion of the granny Flat - - _ -- amendment before the citv's planning commission. The number of such properties isn't known. In addition to the Dakota County cities that allow granny flats, other metro -area suburbs that have Given the GK include Bloomington, Shoreview, Richfield, Roseville and Plyanouth, Also according to the summary Hunting prepared. Ridhfield, Roseville and Farmington allow' them in both homes and accessory structures, as Inver Grove Heights is considering, while 1gg Ply rmoutl allows them only in accessory structures Andover City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes — October 20, 2015 Page 3 talk with the churches regarding their plans with the structures. A CCESSOR Y D WELLING UNITS (AD U) Mr. Carlberg explained at the September 15, 2015 City Council work session, Council discussed an article in the Star Tribune "Granny flats" may find a home in Inver Grove Heights and gave the Planning and Zoning Commission direction to discuss the possibility of allowing ADU's within the City of Andover. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the staff report with the Council. Mayor Trude thought they would want to get some public input regarding this item. She stated no one else is doing a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for these and she thought they would want some neighborhood input to these. Councilmember Holthus wondered if the structures would be like mobile homes. Mr. Carlberg stated the building code has a lot of requirements that would be used for these types of structures. He stated they would want to make sure it is more of a permanent structure rather than a portable type of home. The Council would like the Planning and Zoning Commission to continue to work on a possible ordinance. 2015 GENERAL FUND BUDGET PROGRESS REPORTS Mr. Nkinson stated the City of Andover 2015 General Fund Budget contains total revenues of $9,876,5V and total expenditures of $10,364,730 (includes $26,000 of 2014 budget carry forward); alkerease in fund balance is planned. Mr. Dickinson revielxd the information with the Council. SEPTEMBER 2015 CITY STMENTS REVIEW Mr. Dickinson reviewed the City inves nts with the Council. Mayor Trude asked how the cash carry forward d Balance) is looking. Mr. Dickinson stated it is looking good. 2016 BUDGET & 2016 -2020 CIP DEVELOPMENT UPDA Mr. Dickinson reviewed the 2016 budget and CIP development with the Cou 1, in particular available General Fund Balance.