HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/10/2015 WorkshopANL6 Y O F 6VE
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop
Meeting Agenda
November 10, 2015
Andover City Hall
Conference Rooms A & B
6.00 p.m.
1. Call to Order
2. Discuss Accessory Dwelling Units
3. Other Business
4. Adjournment
WAL, C I T Y • e-�,
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners
FROM: David L. Carlberg, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Discuss Accessory Dwelling Units
DATE: November 10, 2015
REQUEST
The Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to continue discussing accessory
dwelling units (ADU) and the provisions to allow them in the City of Andover.
BACKGROUND
The City Council discussed ADUs at their September 15, 2015 workshop and directed the
Planning and Zoning Commission to explore ordinance provisions to allow them in the
City. The Planning and Zoning Commission at their October 13`h meeting reviewed
several other cities' provisions and determined that ADUs should be allowed in the rural
parts of the City, yet highly restricted. Staff brought this direction back to the City
Council on October 201h and the Council concurred with the Commission's
recommendations and directed the Planning and Zoning Commission to proceed with
drafting language and an ordinance amendment for their consideration.
Staff has also been contacted by a resident interested in building an ADU who is also
employed with the City of Minneapolis. They will be present at the meeting to review
the City of Minneapolis' process in implementing regulations on ADUs and what they
have learned from this process.
Attachments
September 15, 2015 City Council Workshop Staff Report
September 15, 2015 City Council Workshop Minutes
October 13, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session Staff Report
October 13, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session Minutes
October 20, 2015 City Council Staff Report
October 20, 2015 City Council Workshop Minutes
Respectfully Submitted,
rL.� off. , a--�
David L. Carlberg
J r
C T Y O E
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Council Members
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
FROM: David L. Carlberg, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Discuss Accessory Dwelling Units
DATE: September 15, 2015
RE UEST
The City Council is requested to discuss and provide direction to staff on the City
Council's desire to amend the City Code to allow accessory dwelling units.
BACKGROUND
There have been recent inquiries as well as articles in metro newspapers regarding
accessory dwelling units often referred to as granny flats. Attached is a recent
article that appeared in the StarTribune in August. Many cities are changing their
codes to allow accessory dwelling units. Andover does not currently allow
accessory dwelling units but does allow guest houses.
The City allows guest houses in accordance with Section 12- 13 -14. The provisions
are as follows:
12- 13 -14: GUESTHOUSES:
A. Guesthouses, for purpose of this title, shall be an accessory building detached
from the principal building where accommodations for sleeping are provided but
no kitchen facilities are provided. The intended use is for persons visiting the
occupants of the principal building and shall not be
used as a rental property. (Amd. 4/18/06, Ord. 325A)
B. Guesthouses shall be permitted in all residential districts, shall be located
the required depth of the rear yard or more from the principal building, and
shall conform to the side yard requirements for the principal building.
(Amended Ord. 8,10-21-1970)
1 e
ACTION
If City Council is interested in a code change to allow accessory dwelling units,
Council is asked to send this item to the Planning and Zoning Commission.-
Attachments
Article from Star Tribune dated August 14, 2015
Respectfully Submitted,
David L. Carlberg
a t
'Granny flats' may find a home in Inver Grove
The City Council has given a preliminary OK to accessory dwelling units in single- family areas.
By Todd Nelson Special to the Stv Tabun
\I'Gl:ii t,. 2'.]5— II.;fiY \I
e:Order Reprint
Inver Grove Heights is considering joining other Twin Cities suburbs in allowing "granny
flats" in single - family neighborhoods under certain conditions.
"Granny flats," fonnally called accessory dwelling units, are second residences that
homeowners can create as an addition to their houses or in a garage or other structure on
their property. They typically enable seniors to live near family members but also can
provide affordable housing to young singles and families.
In Dakota County, cities that allow them include Eagan, Apple Valley, Lakeville and
Farmington, according to Inver Grove Heights planning officials
Inver Grove Heights' zoning code now allows only one dwelling unit — defined as living,
bath and sleeping spaces and a kitchen — per lot in single - family areas. Residents can add
living, bath and sleeping spaces to single - family homes but not a second kitchen, because
that would constitute a second dwelling unit.
An amendment to the city's zoning code that would let single - family homeowners add a
second, accessory dwelling unit received unanimous City Council approval on Monday. A
third and final vote could take place at the council's next meeting, on Aug. 24, if city staff
completes research on council questions regarding possible rental of accessory dwelling
units and occupancy by nonfamily members.
Citywide approach
The council is taking a citywide approach to regulating granny flats in response to a request
from a resident. He and his wife want to convert the second floor of a detached, unused
garage on their 2.7 -acre property into a full living space for their daughter and son -in -law.
__ The_couple moved into his basement a couple of years ago, and the resident explained that _
he and his wife wanted to help them, while the younger couple would help them stay in their
house longer.
The amendment would allow detached accessory dwelling units only on lots that are at least
1 acre in size and that do not have municipal sewer and water service. The unit would have
to use the same septic system and well as the principal residence.
Skogh believes his existing septic system and well could serve the accessory unit proposed
for his garage and meet other requirements of the amendment, City Planner Allan Hunting
said.
"There isn't anything so far that has made it impossible for them to meet the code
requirements, at least as I understand it," Hunting said in an interview.
Proposed requirements
Further provisions of the amendment would require a granny flat to be 250 to 1,000 square
feet and to house no more than three people. The unit would have to have at least two off -
street parking spaces in addition to the one off -street space required for the primary
residence.
The property owner would have to live in the primary residence or the accessory unit. The
unit the owner does not occupy would require a rental license. Owners would have to
register their accessory dwelling units with the city. The units would have to be a
subordinate part of a single- family home and the design would have to be similar to the
primary residence and be compatible with surrounding homes.
The city has received several inquiries about accessory units and proposals to include them
in new homes or remodeling projects, but the current code required eliminating full kitchens
planned in accessory spaces, Hunting stated in a report to the council. Some properties in
the city may have unapproved granny flats, likely in homes built in the 1950s and 1960s that
< ,
included full kitchens in their basements, according to discussion of the granny flat
amendment before the city's planning commission. The number of such properties_ isn't
known.
In addition to the Dakota County cities that allow granny flats, other metro -area suburbs that
have given the OK include Bloomington, Shoreview, Richfield, Roseville and Plymouth,
according to the summary Hunting prepared. Richfield, Roseville and Farmington allow
them in both homes and accessory structures, as Inver Grove Heights is considering, while
Plymouth allows them only in accessory structures.
EM
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes — September 15, 201 S
Page 2
Mr. Dickinson stated they could do some ponding on the land if they did road impro ments in
the area.
Mayor Trade stated she talked to Gretchen Sabel of the Open Sp/alot on who went out
and looked at the property and stated there are a lot of trees but is ugh and they would
not have chosen it for open space. The landlocked property is noll from what staff
has told her. Mr. Haas indicated the property is landlocked an water on it. He
thought it might have been ta x forfeit but did not designate it as p
Mayor Trade asked if the second property actually added o the City stormwater management
system. Mr. Haas stated there would be some costs to, survey work, an easement on the
property, a description written on it if they wanted to ell the property. Mr. Dickinson stated
there are nine parcels abutting the parcel. Mr. Haas tated the Park and Recreation Commission
recommended both properties to be sold. Mayor rude did not think there would be any money
from a sale, if anything it would cost the City ;Key. Mr. Haas stated they might get some tax
revenue back if someone were to purchase t ,k6 parcels. Councilmember Bukkila stated the cost
to do all of the work could be rolled into t purchase price of the parcels. Staff indicated that is
correct.
Consensus was to keep the parks akf assive parks.
DISCUSS PARK SIGN ADVRRTISEMENT POLICY
Mr. Haas explained the ity Council is requested to consider amending the Park Advertising
Policy to allow basin es to advertise directly with the City in the parks and/or facilities.
Mayor Tr/tught they needed to go back and find out why they originally made the
agreemensociations. Mr. Haas stated it was done so the Associations could make
money.,
Goodrich stated he is not s. The Council
to al cta tons to continue handling the advertisement policy.
DISCUSSACCESSORYDWELLING UNITS
Mayor Trade stated this item came up at Night to Unite by someone who wanted to build a unit
to allow their mother to live with them and stay independent.
Mr. Carlberg explained the City Council is requested to discuss and provide direction to staff on
the City Council's desire to amend the City Code to allow accessory dwelling units.
Councilmember Knight thought if this issue is happening nationwide they should took at this.
The Council concurred to have the Planning and Zoning Commission look at this.
Councilmember Bukkila stated she would only want to allow this on larger parcels.
.,
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes — September-15, -2015
Page 3
Mayor Trude asked if the current city ordinances allow this type of structure. Mr. Carlberg
stated they can have guest home type structures in the City but kitchens in them are not allowed.
Councilmember Goodrich asked if there were any downfalls to allowing the accessory dwelling
units. Mr. Carlberg stated there has not been enough research done on them as of yet.
Councilmember Bukkila stated the concerns are how will people prove a familial relationship
and what authority do they carry otherwise. She stated even if the original intent is for a family
member, the situation is what will happen down the road. She stated this becomes a property
rights issue and they need to look at the parking, congestion, impact to schools and use of
services and roads. Mayor Trude stated when she looked at the City of Minneapolis code they
had everything covered that Councilmember Bukkila mentioned and more.
Mayor Trude thought it would be a good idea for the Planning and Zoning Commission to
review this and find any issues with it that might come up for the Council to look at.
Councilmember Bukkila stated as a tag along they will end up with a renter situation, they will
need an eviction process along with possibly of more domestic issues. Mr. Carlberg stated it
could be regulated by a rental license.
Fire Chief Streich reviewed his personal situation and the requirements in his community. He
stated with the cost of senior housing, many cannot afford it and it would break some people.
Councilmember Knight asked if they could put an age limit on it. Mayor Trude stated the person
who brought this up has a daughter who has special needs but wants to be independent.
Councilmember Bukkila did not think it will happen in volume from the start but they do not
want to be so narrow minded as to not look ahead to find out what could happen in thirty years.
Mayor Trude thought the Planning and Zoning Commission should look at this and bring it
forward to the City Council for discussion. Councilmember Bukkila stated she would like to
review this item before it went to the Planning and Zoning Commission and see other city's
ordinances regarding this.
Councilmember Holthus thought it would be good for the Planning and Zoning Commission to
look at this because they may have a different perspective of it.
Councilmember Bukkila stated she would like to see more drafts from other cities before it
would go to the Planning and Zoning Commission because if they are not comfortable, as a
Council with the idea, she wondered if it is worth having the Planning and Zoning Commission
spending time on it. She thought the Council could do the first blush with staff's help rather than
give it to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Consensus of the Council was to have the Planning and Zoning Commission review this and
bring it back to the Council before proceeding with a public hearing on the topic.
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
- _- FAXrt763Y755--8923 *- WWW.C"NDOVER.MN.US- -
TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners
FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner
SUBJECT: Discuss Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU)
DATE: October 13, 2015
INTRODUCTION
At the September 15, 2015 City Council work session, Council discussed an article in the Star
Tribune `Granny flats' may find a home in Inver Grove Heights. The article is attached for your
review.
Andover does not allow ADU's, defined as an accessory unit with cooking facilities, sanitary
facilities and an independent means of access, attached to the single family dwelling unit/garage
(attached or detached). However,. Andover does allow guesthouses, defined as an accessory
building detached from the principal building where accommodation for sleeping is provided but
no kitchen facility is provided. Since Andover does not allow ADU's, the City Council directed
the Planning and Zoning Commission to research and discuss the option of allowing ADU's in
the city. Staff researched other city codes mentioned in the article. The information is attached
for your review.
DISCUSSION
Other City Requirements
Through researching 9 communities mentioned in the article, staff determined most have
similar /same code requirements. Commonalities include:
• Allowed in urban districts
• Square footage is limited
• Property owner must reside on property
• Can be attached or detached from the primary residence
• Occupancy is limited
• Off street parking provided
• Provides full living facilities — kitchen, bathroom, bedroom
«,lien Planning and Zoning Commission are discussing ADU's, staff suggests discussin-
possible pros and cons associated with the changes. Some to consider may be the following:
Pros
Enables seniors to live near family members
Provides affordable housing
Provides supplemental income to property owner
Cons
T T._....- --- "- - A - - `L- - -_ -._, i - - V -` --
Does allowing 2 living units per parcel conflict with local zoning?
ACTION REQUESTED
The P &Z Commission is requested to cuss ADU's, the pros and cons -an , prove a staff an
Council with direction regarding the possibility of allowing them within the City of Andover.
Attachments
Star Tribune Article `Granny flats' may find a home in Inver Grove Heights
Research of City Codes
R*esp l Sub 'tt d,
SL. Hanson
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MEETING
OCTOBER 13, 201 S
The Workshop Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called to
order by Chairperson Daninger on October 13, 2015, 6:00 p.m., of the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota.
Commissioners present: Chairperson Daninger, Commissioners Lynae
Gudmundson, Bert Koehler, and Kyle Nemeth.
Commissioners absent: Commissioner Tim Cleven, Steve Peterson and Jeff Sims.
Also present: Community Development Director Dave Carlberg
City Planner Stephanie Hanson
Others
DISCUSS ACCESSORY D 6VELLING UNITS
Ms. Hanson stated at the September 15, 2015 City Council work session, Council
discussed an article in the Star Tribune "Granny Flats" may find a new home in Inver
Grove Heights. The City Council indicated they would like further review and discussion
on these types of accessory dwellings from the Planning Commission and brought back
to the City Council for further review.
Mr. Carlberg reviewed with the Commission the discussion that happened at the
September 15, 2015 City Council workshop meeting.
Ms. Hanson stated in many of the cities they reviewed the ordinances were very similar.
She stated Farmington allows them through CUP's but have never approved a CUP for
one. Commissioner Koehler asked if Farmington has denied a CUP for one. Ms. Hanson
indicated they have.
Commissioner Koehler asked how many cars are allowed in driveways today in Andover.
Ms. Hanson stated they do not have any requirement other than they need to park on hard
surface. Commissioner Koehler stated he saw a handout that goes out to new residents
that states "two cars per driveway ". Commissioner Nemeth stated he has seen that too.
Chairperson Daninger thought that was a covenant for the neighborhood association.
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting
Minutes — October 13, 2015
Page 2
Commissioner Koehler indicated this is on the City's website but he could not find it
anywhere in the City Code. Mr. Carlberg indicated he would check into this.
Mr. Carlberg stated the Commission should discuss where they would want to see these
types of structures allowed in the City. Council discussed possibly allowing them in the
rural areas where there is more room.
Commissioner Nemeth asked if the structures would possibly overtax the city water and
sewer systems. Commissioner Koehler stated he had the same concern and that other
utilities such as gas and electric could be affected as well. He thought there needs to be a
check on all of these things by all of the proper authorities. Mr. Carlberg stated if these
would be allowed only in the rural areas they would not burden the city systems because
they would be on private septic systems and wells.
Chairperson Daninger asked how they would deal with these in an R -4 District. He
thought there would be setback issues and other issues associated with it. Mr. Carlberg
stated they could have a dwelling above the garage or in the basement of a home.
Commissioner Gudmundson stated they would want to do CUP's on these because if they
did not set any boundaries on what they could potentially build then their rural area is
going to end up looking like Isanti County. She thought they would want to look at what
they are proposing and building and thought they would like a permit placed on this. Mr.
Carlberg stated they could put conditions on them.
Commissioner Nemeth stated he would like to then have a sunset clause placed on these
in case the property gets sold. Mr. Carlberg did not think that would work because of the
cost associated with the building on the structures. Commissioner Koehler stated they
would need to tie up the language enough that the new homeowner would be painted into
certain conditions where they could use that dwelling so it would not have to be removed.
He stated another concern he had was for other utilities such as electrical and natural gas.
Chairperson Daninger did not think that would be enough of an issue because that is
coming into developments where sewer is going as well. Commissioner Nemeth stated
they just had Centerpoint Energy come in asking for more capacity for tanks.
Commissioner Gudmundson thought a CUP would be needed in order to address all of
the possible concerns and issues. Commissioner Koehler stated a CUP needs to have
some guidance.
Mr. Carlberg reviewed some of the other cities requirements where the structures are
allowed with the Commission.
Commissioner Koehler thought there needed to be some regulation around what
residential zoning they will allow these on.
Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting
Minutes — October 13, 2015
Page 3
The Commission discussed where in the City the structures should be allowed and
requirements needed.
The Commission thought the best procedure for allowing these types of structures in the
City would be with a CUP.
Staff indicated they would bring this information forward to the City Council for further
discussion.
Ms. Nson stated at the September 9, 2015 work session, the Planning and Zoning
Commis ' n discussed the intent of PUD's. During the discussion, it was suggested that
staff provi a list for the Commission to reference when reviewing PUD's.
Commissioner hler stated the idea of a list was not to come up with an exclusive all
encompassing list b just something to get them thinking in the right direction. He
thought they should h e a checklist of things the City wants to avoid when looking at a
PUD.
Commissioner Nemeth stated would like to add three items to the list. First one being
"No item that requires City or As ciation maintenance ", such as roundabouts with
center island plantings. The second e is related to parks and do they want to ask for a
certain size of a park in a PUD. Mr. C berg stated the Park Commission has a City
wide plan where parks are to be located. ey would not take a park with a PUD but
open space could be preserved by allowing stering within the development.
There was discussion about Homeowner Associa ' ns and PUD's.
Mr. Carlberg stated in order to allow a homeowner ass iation in a PUD the PUD needs
to be larger with enough units to support the HOA. He c d examples of failures such as
Country Oaks West.
Commissioner Nemeth stated he really liked having a developer arrative about
compliance with the City Code, 13 -3 -11 and thought for the Comm ion this should be
front and foremost. Addressing how are they complying and meeting ity requirements.
He thought that needs to come from the developer in marketing their dev opment to the
Commission.
Chairperson Daninger stated the lists are nice and he likes the points discussed b no two
PUD's are alike. He thought as they see more PUD's they will get better and peop get
more experienced. He thought the list will help but as they see more of these come
forward they will get more experienced and better. Commissioner Nemeth agreed with
Commissioner Koehler that if they have a list, they will remember to ask questions.
(ANDOVE^
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100
FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
CC: Jim Dickinson, City Administrator
Dave Carlberg, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) - Planning
DATE: October 20, 2015
INTRODUCTION
At the September 15, 2015 City Council work session, Council discussed an article in the Star
Tribune `Granny flats' may find a home in Inver Grove Heights and gave the Planning and
Zoning Commission (P & Z) direction to discuss the possibility of allowing ADU's within the
City of Andover.
DISCUSSION
Andover does not allow ADU's, defined as an accessory unit with cooking facilities, sanitary
facilities and an independent means of access, attached to the single family dwelling unit/garage
(attached or detached). However, Andover does allow guesthouses, defined as an accessory
building detached from the principal building where accommodation for sleeping is provided but
no kitchen facility is provided. Since Andover does not allow ADU's, staff researched other city
codes mentioned in the article. The information is attached for your review.
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
At the October 13, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission work session, P & Z discussed and
supported the possibility of allowing ADU's within the City of Andover. P & Z directed staff to
assemble some of the most restrictive provisions for the other cities codes regulating ADU's.
The following is a list to consider:
• Allow as a CUP in the RI Single Familv Rural District
• Requires a rental license from the City
• Property owner must reside on the property
• Maximum one bedroom
• No more than two occupants
• Minimum size of 500 sf and maximum size of 900 sf
• 2 off street parking spaces to be provided
• Can be attached or detached from the primary residence
ACTION REQUESTED
City Council is requested to discuss ADU's and provide P & Z and staff with direction regarding
the possibility of allowing them within the City of Andover.
Attachments
_Research of City Codes
Star Tribune article `Granny flats' may find home in Inver Grove Heights
October 13, 2015 Draft P & Z Workshop Meeting Minutes
Res ectful Subm'
Stephanie L. Hanson
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU)
Definition
A subordinate habitable dwelling unit. An accessory dwelling unit has cooking facilities, sanitary
facilities and an independent means of access, attached to the single family dwelling unit/garage
(attached or detached).
Apple Valley
Permitted accessory use
Allowed in Zone 1
No more than 2 occupants provided 2 off street surface parking spaces exist
Dwelling shall not exceed 900 sf
Eagan
Permitted accessory use
Allowed in Estate District (16,000 so and R1 (12,000 so
Property owner must reside in primary residence or ADU.
Dwelling shall be no more than 960 sf or 33% of the primary residences footprint, whichever is
less. An ADU shall not be less than 300 ft.
Shall not contain no more than 2 bedrooms
Must be located within or attached to the primary residence
Must be connected to municipal sewer and water
Elk River
Permitted accessory use, need license from the Fire Chief and a rental license
Property owner must reside on the property
Dwelling size must be between 250 ft - 1,000 sf
No more than 2 bedrooms
No front yard entrance
Can be attached or detached from the primary residence
-- Farmineton — -- -
Allowed with a conditional use permit
Allowed in the Ag District, R2 (6,000 so and R5 (40,000 sf – 12 units /acre)
Property owner must reside on the property
Dwelling maximum size is 1,800 sf
Lakeville
Permitted with an Administrative Permit from the Zoning Administrator
Must be attached to primary residence with an interior connection between to the 2 living
quarters
Must have municipal sewer and water available
Must have 3 garage stalls attached to the residence
No more than 2 occupants
Minneapolis
Permitted with an Administrative Permit from Zoning Administrator
Can be internal to the principal structure, attached or detached
Internal and attached – limited to 800 sf, no external stairs
Detached – Limited to 1,000 sf, can have external stairs
Property owner must reside on property
Plymouth
Allowed in the following districts: Rural (1 acre), urban 12,500 sf – 18,000 so
Permitted with an Administrative Permit
Must be located above an attached or detached garage
Shall not exceed 1,000 sf or the gross floor area of the principal dwelling. whichever is less
Property owner must reside on the property
2 off street parking spaces shall be provided
- — - - - - --
- - Must be connected to municipal sewer and water - — - - -
Richfield
Permitted accessory use
Can be attached or detached from the primary residence
Shall be between 300 ft - 800 sf or the gross floor area of the principal dwelling, whichever is
less
A minimum of 3 off - street parking spaces is required in order to add an ADU of any kind
Roseville
Allowed in the LDR -1 District (11,000 sf- 12,500 so
Allowed with a nontransferable ADU Occupancy Permit from the Community Development
Department
Property owner must reside on the property
Shall be 300 sf - 650 sf, but in no case shall it exceed 75% of the principal dwellings four season
living area
Must provide 1 off- street parking space
Occupancy is limited to 2 people
Maximum of 1 bedroom
Shoreview
Allowed in Estate and Detached single family district
Permitted with an Administrative Permit by the City Manager. Permit must be renewed upon the
sale of the home
Cannot be more than 30% of the buildings total floor area nor greater than 800 sf with a
minimum of 500 sf of living space
tMaximum 2 bedrooms
Property owner must reside on the property
No front entrances shall be added to the house to access the apartment
I off - street parkin; spaces shall be provided, 2 of which must be enclosed
'Granny flats' may- find -a - home in =Inver -Grove
Heights
The Cihr Council has given a preliminary OK to a.cz >sory d.velling tin; IS in iirle- [ily ar;a;.
6k Tadd ?e6nV SFecul to .. 9 -,u Trwne
e:OrdQ-r Reprint
Inver Grove Heights is considering joining other Twin Cities suburbs in allowing "granny
flats" in single- family neighborhoods tinder certain conditions.
"Granny flats," formally called accessory dwelling units; are second residences that
homeowners can create as an addition to their houses or in a Garage or other structure on
their property. They typically enable seniors to live near family members but also can
provide affordable housing to ,young singles and families.
In Dakota County, cities that allow them include Earan, Apple Valley, Lakeville and
Farmington, according to Inver Grove Heights planning officials.
Inver Grove Heights' zoning code now allows only one dwelling unit — defined as living
bath and sleeping spaces and a kitchen — per lot in single- family areas, Residents can add
living, bath and sleeping spaces to single - family homes but not a second kitchen, because
that would constitute a second dwetling unit.
An amendment to the city's zoning code that %would let single - family homeowners add a
second, accessory d:T, elti(Ig knit receit;ed unalunzous City Council approval on Monday. A
third and final vote could take place at the council's next meeting, on Auca. 2i, if city staff
C0111DIeteS r,-search on council questions regardln2 possthl. rental Of a cctssm -J dLae11'
!touts gnu -up- 11-y h,- non_fa nllly nl',nlb -rs
CitL id _ pro ch
T!1-1 CU'_lil !1 Is t1�1f1 Cf L "'1C1 c I) hoacll tt) 1' yTlll'l llcr C fl!1nV Ila.ts In F-SpD11s2 to a 1N11_st
1!v121 c rl- a!J °_M, Fl-- .[1(l lllS 4 iP to Sucolld floor of I clalaCli--lL LleillycC
garage on their 2.7 -acre property into a full living space for their daughter and son -in -law.
The couple moved into his basement a couple of years ago, and the resident explained that
he and his wife wanted to help theirs, while the younger couple would help them stay in their
house longer.
The arnendrnent would allow detached accessory dwelling units only on loth that are at least
1 acre in size and that do not have municipal sewer and water wervice. The unit would have
to use the same septic system and well as the principal residence.
Skogh believes his existing septic system and well could serve the accessory unit proposed
for his garage and meet other requirements of the amendment, City Planner Allan Hunting
said.
"There isn't an%illing so far that has made it impossible for them to meet the cod-,
requirements, at least as 1 understand it," Hunting said in an interview.
Proposed requirements
Further provisions of the amendment would require a grarmy flat to be 250 to 1,000 square
feet and to house no more than three people. The unit would have to have at least two off-
street parking spaces in addition to th-, one off - street space required for the primary
residence.
The prop -rL ovcaer would haVe to live in the primary resid-,nce or the accessory unit. The
unit th:. ov, ner does not eccup Vti'o:rid require a rental license. Owners would have to
resister the,' n- cessoj-� d%,,elting units % ith the cih,. Ttte units ��: ould have to be a
subordinate part of a sink fanuly home end the dsign %-:�o�.rid hate to be similar to the
p {l @�t r,�' Ce�rlrI1C c�n�l �1� col:pntl! -J =Ln lrn 1191h °j.
l h� C!t ,.1u s to :u
ri [iCir I[�ln12S or P'Fa -C�.�, bi_rt tl__ cilrler t Cod- 1;61.:-J ekntlr:ntln? tirli
`V Jp : tu: 'r 1 12
tl If `i, r,lpi
ll. Scw� 1? p:"o;)..r!.r'� IIl
included full kitchens in their basements, according to discussion of the granny Flat
- - _ --
amendment before the citv's planning commission. The number of such properties isn't
known.
In addition to the Dakota County cities that allow granny flats, other metro -area suburbs that
have Given the GK include Bloomington, Shoreview, Richfield, Roseville and Plyanouth, Also
according to the summary Hunting prepared. Ridhfield, Roseville and Farmington allow'
them in both homes and accessory structures, as Inver Grove Heights is considering, while
1gg
Ply rmoutl allows them only in accessory structures
Andover City Council Workshop Meeting
Minutes — October 20, 2015
Page 3
talk with the churches regarding their plans with the structures.
A CCESSOR Y D WELLING UNITS (AD U)
Mr. Carlberg explained at the September 15, 2015 City Council work session, Council discussed
an article in the Star Tribune "Granny flats" may find a home in Inver Grove Heights and gave
the Planning and Zoning Commission direction to discuss the possibility of allowing ADU's
within the City of Andover.
Mr. Carlberg reviewed the staff report with the Council.
Mayor Trude thought they would want to get some public input regarding this item. She stated
no one else is doing a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for these and she thought they would want
some neighborhood input to these.
Councilmember Holthus wondered if the structures would be like mobile homes. Mr. Carlberg
stated the building code has a lot of requirements that would be used for these types of structures.
He stated they would want to make sure it is more of a permanent structure rather than a portable
type of home.
The Council would like the Planning and Zoning Commission to continue to work on a possible
ordinance.
2015 GENERAL FUND BUDGET PROGRESS REPORTS
Mr. Nkinson stated the City of Andover 2015 General Fund Budget contains total revenues of
$9,876,5V and total expenditures of $10,364,730 (includes $26,000 of 2014 budget carry
forward); alkerease in fund balance is planned.
Mr. Dickinson revielxd the information with the Council.
SEPTEMBER 2015 CITY STMENTS REVIEW
Mr. Dickinson reviewed the City inves nts with the Council.
Mayor Trude asked how the cash carry forward d Balance) is looking. Mr. Dickinson stated
it is looking good.
2016 BUDGET & 2016 -2020 CIP DEVELOPMENT UPDA
Mr. Dickinson reviewed the 2016 budget and CIP development with the Cou 1, in particular
available General Fund Balance.