Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/26/2014ANLb 6 W A 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda August 26, 2014 Andover City Hall Council Chambers 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes —August 11, 2014 Regular Meeting 3. Public Hearing: Consider Rezoning of 10.02 acres from R -1 Single Family Rural to R -4 Single Family Urban - 14123 Prairie Road NW — TH Construction of Anoka 4. Public Hearing Continued: Consider the Preliminary Plat of the Carson Ridge Planned Unit Development — 18 lot single family urban residential development located at 14123 Prairie Road NW — TH Construction of Anoka 5. Public Hearing: Consider the Preliminary Plat of Winslow Woods 2 "d Addition — an 18 lot single family urban residential development located east of Hanson Boulevard, on 150`h Lane NW — Tony Emmerich Construction 6. Public Hearing: Consider the Preliminary Plat of White Pine Wilderness 2 "d Addition — a 15 lot single family urban residential development located at 1341 161st Avenue NW — Larry Emmerich 7. Other Business 8. Adjournment 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW. CLAN DOVE R.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes — August 11, 2014 DATE: August 26, 2014 REQUEST The Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to approve the minutes from the August 11, 2014 regularly scheduled meeting. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING — AUGUST]], 2014 The Regular Bi- Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Holthus on August 11, 2014, 7:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners present: Chairperson Holthus, Commissioners Timothy Cleven, Dean Daninger, Lynae Gudmundson, Bert Koehler IV, Kyle Nemeth and Steve Peterson. Commissioners absent: None. Also present: Community Development Director Dave Carlberg City Planner Stephanie Hanson Others APPROVAL OF MINUTES. July 8, 2014 Commissioner Nemeth indicated he had a few changes. He noted a change on page 2, third paragraph, second sentence from the bottom, "approval or denial of the property." Page 4, third paragraph down, "Mr. Smolek 6wified asked if the water table would be lowered ", the Community Development Director actually did the clarification. The fourth paragraph down, third sentence, "He explained the value of the home is not based on the size of the lot". Page 6, last paragraph, second sentence from the end "approved conditional use permit and to revise the approved planning unit development on lots three through five ". Page nine, fifth paragraph down with the motion, third sentence from the end should read "amend the existing approved Conditional Use Permit, and to revise the approved Plan Unit Development." Chairperson Holthus stated on page one, first paragraph under public hearing it states Tom Emmerich Construction and should be Tony Emmerich Construction. Page two, it shows Tommy Emmerich Construction and needs to change to Tony. Motion by Nemeth, seconded by Peterson, to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- present ( Daninger), 0- absent vote. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —August 11, 2014 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING: Consider the Preliminary Plat of the Carson Ridge Planned Unit Development —18 Lot Single Family Urban Residential Development Located at 14123 Prairie Road NW— TH Construction. City Planner Hanson noted the purpose of this item is to hold a public hearing and take input on the Preliminary Plat of the Carson Ridge Planned Unit Development. City Planner Hanson reviewed the proposed Preliminary Plat with the Commission. Commissioner Nemeth asked in regards to the cul -de -sac length, 500 hundred feet is the maximum that is usually set up. Mr. Carlberg stated that is a maximum requirement of the City's subdivision code, however there are several in the City that are longer where variances have been granted. Commissioner Nemeth asked if the Public Works Department reviewed this and were there any comments regarding the 598 feet. Ms. Hanson stated they did not have any comments regarding the length of the cul -de -sac. Commissioner Gudmundson asked if there have been any changes made to the plans since last reviewed by them. Ms. Hanson stated there has not, the only thing that changed was it has now come back as a PUD. Commissioner Koehler stated when this was discussed in 2013, there was some question as to whether or not the developer had talked to adjacent property owners to see if there was property available for sale and he wondered if there was any information on this. Ms. Hanson indicated the developer could answer this question. Commissioner Peterson stated on Lot 6 it looks like there is a tree line which ends at Lot 7 and he wondered why this would stop and asked if they are planting additional trees on Lot 7. Ms. Hanson thought the developer could answer that question as well. Commissioner Peterson asked if there are additional enhancements on the plan since changing to a PUD. Ms. Hanson stated the enhancement is they are trying to save as many trees as possible along with some additional plantings and architectural standards will be higher than other areas. Commissioner Daninger stated in a PUD there is always give and take and he wondered what was in exchange by the developer for a PUD. He would like to hear from the developer in regards to this. Commissioner Nemeth wondered with the minimum lot depth change, 127 feet versus 130 feet, are there any concerns regarding safety or accessibility that came up when reviewed by staff. Ms. Hanson stated they do not have any concerns. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —August]], 2014 Page 3 Commissioner Koehler asked if there is any reason why the setbacks and lot depth are set where they are besides aesthetics. He wondered if there was something the City was concerned about. Ms. Hanson stated there was not. Motion by Daninger, seconded by Koehler, to open the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Motion carried on a 7 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- absent vote. There was an email submitted from Thomas and Susan Chounard, 14123 Prairie Rd NW regarding this item. Mr. Ed Gritton, 14157 Prairie Road NW, stated he had lots of concerns, most are personal. He stated he has been trying to market his property for the last ten to fifteen years without success. He stated his concern is this limits his ability to market his property. The other concerns have to do with their owning horses and he wondered what kind of problems this will cause to them personally with their livestock. It will create a financial issue for them because they are going to have to put up substantial fencing to secure their animals from the incoming neighborhood bordering their property. There are also other maintenance impacts such as what to do with the manure created. The biggest concern is the inability to market their property because of the way the plan is drawn up. Ms. Tricia Stanaway, 472 140'' Lane NW, stated her concern is this is a big cul -de -sac with a lot of traffic coming out and her driveway will be at the end of the road. She stated there will be a lot of added traffic coining out and she wondered if there will be some additional traffic control at the intersection such as a three way stop sign or something else. She wondered if it would help with fewer houses or if they could not make it a cul -de -sac and bring the road out to Prairie Road, which would help alleviate some traffic coming through. Also on the corner of Ilex and 1401h Lane is a bus stop for elementary students and a safety concern for her. Mrs. Sandy Roslin, 486 140th Lane NW, agreed with Ms. Stanaway. She stated there is also a family with three children and one of the children has special needs and they play in the cul -de -sac, which will now be Ilex Street and is a safety concern for her. Mrs. Jean Streeter, 289 141" Avenue NW, stated their land abuts this property and there is a wetland area. They watched all of the trees across the creek being torn out and she wants to make sure the trees are not removed to the boundary on this property. She would like assurance that all the trees will not be removed because it is wildlife devastation. Mrs. Kathy Larson, 14237 Olive Street NW, felt the same way as the other residents. She stated they watched the entire comer be torn down and wildlife was not considered and she hopes the wildlife will be considered in this plan. She thought this will be a lot of houses thrown into a little area and Prairie Road is already a speedway. She wondered why this development is going in when the development on the corner has not even been started. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — August 11, 2014 Page 4 Mr. Everett Frederick, 609 142 °a Avenue NW, stated it looks like the developers are using all that vacant land for a parking lot for equipment and he wondered what, if anything is going to happen soon. Ms. Hanson indicated she would update Mr. Frederic after the meeting. Mr. Tony Hennen, TH construction, 617 East Main Street, Anoka, was at the meeting to answer questions. Commissioner Daninger wondered what Mr. Hennen felt he was giving to get this PUD. Mr. Hennen indicated this is not a large development so there is not a lot more that can be done. They are going to be doing more tree plantings and also put nicer looking houses in there with the base point of $400,000. Mr. Hennen stated the tree line ends at Lot 7 because the City needs to have adequate drainage areas within the development. He noted he did not want to remove trees but was asked by the City Engineering Department to meet City standards. Commissioner Peterson stated it did not look like on Lot 6 any trees were planted or removed so the tree line might want to be continued from there. Mr. Hennen stated that could be a possibility depending on what the City wants. He did not see a problem with additional trees. He did not think there would be an issue with the horses because people like to look at them. He stated he would also work with the property owner on fencing. Commissioner Gudmundson wondered how the houses will be different than the ones east of this development. Mr. Hennen stated he would make sure they keep up the architectural standards and will be consistent with homes surrounding this development. Commissioner Gudmundson wondered if Mr. Hennen has talked to the property owner to the north about purchasing the parcel. Mr. Hennen stated he did talk to the owner's wife and she was not sure if they would want to sell seven feet to him or not. Commissioner Nemeth stated they received an email from Susan Chounard, and she was not aware of a path or bike trail going in and she requested a fence be installed. He wondered if the residents were aware of a proposed trail going in. Mr. Hennen stated since the first sketch plan there was discussion with the Park Commission regarding a trail going in. Commissioner Nemeth wondered what the price point will be for the homes. Mr. Hennen stated it would be from $400,000 and up. Commissioner Nemeth stated he did not have a big issue with the back yard setback but the front setback concerns him and be asked why Mr. Hennen would want the homes closer to the street. Mr. Hennen stated some of the Councilmembers were concerned Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — August 11, 2014 Page 5 with the smaller backyards so he suggested moving the homes five feet closer to the road to make the backyards larger. Commissioner Nemeth stated the plan is showing two trees sitting on the corners of each lot and he wondered if this was where they were going to be planted. Mr. Hennen stated they would not be planted in the City Right -of -Way, it was just to show trees on the lots. Commissioner Koehler asked if there were any plans to put decks on the homes. Mr. Hennen stated decks may be added to the model homes but he would leave that up to the people purchasing the homes. Mrs. Sandy Roslin stated the only concern of the neighbors is when Shadowbrook first went in the homes were in the $500,000 range and there were not many homes built so the price range went down. The sign out on Prairie Road stated homes will be starting at $300,000 and not $400,000. Their concern is that the houses will not sell at $400,000 and the developer will start to lower the house base to get people to purchase. She wondered how they could make the developer not lower the home values if they do not sell. Mr. Ed Gritton stated when the developer approached his wife for the additional seven feet of land and they approached their lender to see if they could sell or give the developer that property, the lender told them they could not do that. He stated with regard to the fencing, it will have to be something that will prevent toys and children from going into their property with the horses. Commissioner Daninger asked staff if the street width could be reduced. Mr. Carlberg stated they did not have any discussion about reducing the street width and there would also be an issue with the transition coming up Ilex Street. Commissioner Daninger asked if the shape of the cul -de -sac was due to the existing home there. Mr. Carlberg stated the location of where it stops is. The design of the bulb is for better lot design and the lots meeting the minimum lot requirements. Commissioner Daninger stated he wanted to make sure at the next meeting the ghost plat to the north is addressed. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the ghost plat adjoining this development. Chair Holthus asked when the traffic control plans would be discussed. Mr. Carlberg reviewed with the Commission traffic control changes for the area. Motion by Gudmundson, Seconded by Nemeth, to continue the public hearing until the August 26, 2014 Planning Commissioner Meeting. Motion carried on a 7 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- absent vote. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — August 11, 2014 Page 6 OTHER BUSINESS. Community Development Director Carlberg updated the Planning Commission on related items. City Planner Hanson updated the Commission on what will be discussed at the August 26, 2014 meeting. ADJOURNMENT. Motion by Peterson, seconded by Nemeth, to adjourn the meeting at 8:04 p.m. Motion carried on a 7 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- absent vote. Respectfully Submitted, Sue Osbeck, Recording Secretary Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. ANLb 6 V 9A 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. a ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Rezoning request to change the zoning from R -1 Single Family Rural to R -4 Single Family Urban for ten (10) acres located at 14123 Prairie Road NW – PIN's 25- 32 -24 -34 -0003 and 25- 32 -24 -34 -0004 — Carson Ridge plat DATE: August 26, 2014 INTRODUCTION The Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to review the proposed request to rezone ten (10) acres from R -1 Single Family Rural to R -4 Single Family Urban as requested by TH Construction of Anoka. DISCUSSION The rezoning will allow for the parcels to develop into urban lots at a density of 1.75 to 3.6 single family homes per acre. As with all rezonings, the City must meet one of the two following findings that are provided by state statute: 1. The original zoning was in error. 2. The character of the area or times and conditions have changed to such an extent to warrant the Rezoning. The property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and also within the current stage of sewer expansion. Times and conditions have changed with the extension of municipal sewer and water into this area of the City. It has been requested by the property owner to rezone the property from R -1 Single Family Rural to R -4 Single Family Urban. The rezoning would allow the property owner to request an urban residential development and utilize the available municipal sewer and water services in the area. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to hold a public hearing to gather public input and consider recommending approval of the rezoning request based on the fact that the property is located within the MUSA, water and sewer are available to the property, and the request is in harmony with the Andover Comprehensive Plan. Attachments Ordinance Amendment Location and Rezoning Maps Respectfully submit , Stephanie L. Hanson Cc: Tony Hennen, TH Construction of Anoka, 617 E. Main St, Anoka, MN 55304 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE XXX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE TITLE 12 -3 -4, ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: City Code 12 -3 -4, The Zoning District Map of the City of Andover is hereby amended as follows: 1. Rezone land from R -1, Single Family Rural Residential to R -4, Single Family Urban Residential on ten (10) acres for PIN's 25- 32 -24 -34 -0003 and 25- 32 -24 -34 -0004, legally described in Exhibit A. 2. The findings for the rezonings are that the properties are located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area and also within the current stage of sewer expansion. Times and conditions have changed with the extension of municipal sewer and water into this area of the City. It is now appropriate to rezone the property to Single Family Urban Residential (R -4) at the request of the property owner to allow the property to utilize the available municipal sewer and water. 3. All other sections of the Zoning Ordinance shall remain as written and adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 2nd day of September 2014. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Michelle Hartner, City Clerk Michael R. Gamache, Mayor EXHIBIT A Legal Property Descriptions That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 32, Range 24, Described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the South line of said Southwest Quarter and the Easterly line of Prairie Road; thence continuing Northeasterly along the Easterly line of Prairie Road a distance of 353.08 feet to point of beginning; thence East and parallel with the South line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 315.7 feet; thence South at right angles a distance of 280.3 feet, more or less, to a point 38 feet North of the South line of said Southwest Quarter; thence West and parallel with the South line of said Southwest Quarter to the point of intersection with the East line of said Prairie Road; thence Northeasterly along the East line of said Prairie Road to point of beginning. PID No. 25- 32 -24 -34 -0004 Parcel 2: That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 32, Range 24, lying East of the East line of Prairie Road and Southerly of a line parallel with the South line of said Southwest Quarter and 313.30 feet Northerly thereof; EXCEPT: That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 32, Range 24, described as follows: Commencing at the Intersection of the South line of said Southwest Quarter and the Easterly line of Prairie Road; thence continuing Northeasterly along the Easterly line of Prairie Road a distance of 353.08 feet to point of beginning; thence East and parallel with the South line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 315.7 feet; thence South at right angles a distance of 280.3 feet, more or less, to a point 33 feet North of the South line of said Southwest Quarter; thence West and parallel with the South line of said Southwest Quarter to the point of intersection with the East line of said Prairie Road; thence Northeasterly along the East line of said Prairie Road to point of beginning. PID No. 25- 32 -24 -34 -0003 A96-6--^Rezoning Location Map VE H Disclaimer: Maps and documents made available to the public by the City of Andover are not legally recorded maps or surveys and are not intended to be used as such. The maps and documents are created as part of the Geographic Information System (GIS) that compiles records, information, and data from various city, county, state and federal resources. w E Copyright © 2013 City of Andover, All Rights Reserved Printed 08/15/2014 s AC I T Y o f Proposed Zoning Change: MOVE R1 Single Family Rural to R4 Single Family Urban VE 141ST 745 LN 141ST LN 643 14122 Legend QZoning Change Q R -1 - Single Family -Rural ® R -4 - Single Family -Urban 14370 14157 14367 14315 14191 140TH LN MI 6 140TH AVE w ® � Mik �'. �L^9• 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUATION: Preliminary Plat /Planned Unit Development (PTJD) known as Carson Ridge, a single- family urban residential development located at14123 Prairie Road NW. DATE: August 26, 2014 DISCUSSION On August 11, 2014, the Planning and Zoning Commission opened the public hearing to take public input for the preliminary plat /PUD request for Carson Ridge. The plat contains 18 -urban lots as proposed by TH Construction of Anoka. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to continue the public hearing from the August 11, 2014 meeting to gather public input, review the proposed preliminary plat/PUD and make a recommendation to the City Council. Attachments Resolution Location Map DRAFT August 11, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes November 12, 2013 Approved Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes November 19, 2013 Approved City Council Meeting Minutes 13 -3 -11 Desirable PUD Design Qualities Carson Ridge PUD Project Overview (Tree Preservation Plan and House Elevations) Resident Email from Thomas and Susan Chouinard, 14123 Prairie Rd NW Preliminary Plat Plan Set Respectfully submitted Stephanie L. Hanson Cc: Tony Hennen, TH Construction of Anoka, 617 E. Main St, Anoka, MN 55303 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO XXX A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF "CARSON RIDGE" LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: The south 313.30 feet of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota lying Easterly of the Easterly right of way line of Prairie Road. WHEREAS, the Andover Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD); and WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing on said preliminary plat and PUD; and WHEREAS, as a result of such public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and determined that said request meets the criteria of City Code 13 Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council the approval of the preliminary plat/PUD, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Cormmission and approves the preliminary plat/PUD review of Carson Ridge, with the following conditions: 1. The Preliminary Plat shall conform to the plans stamped received on July 21, 2014. 2. Exhibit A shall regulate the lot dimensions and setbacks for the proposed development. 3. The development shall conform to City Code Titles 11, 12, and 13, as well as Exhibit A "Carson Ridge Design Standards ". Exhibit A shall regulate when in conflict with the City Code. 4. The developer obtains all necessary permits from the Coon Creek Watershed District, DNR, Corps of Engineers, LGU, MPCA, and any other agency that may be interested in the site. 5. Park dedication and trail fees must be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. Contingent upon staff review and approval for compliance with City ordinances, policies and guidelines. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 2nd day of September, 2014. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Michelle Hartner, Deputy City Clerk Michael R. Gamache, Mayor ATTACHMENT A Carson Ridge Planned Unit Development Approved Design Standards No. Item -4 Standard P.U.D. Reason for Request 1 Min. Lot Width 80 feet 80 to 98 feet Conforms to R -4 width standards. 4 lots are 80 feet in width while 14 lots are 90+ feet in width. 2 Min. Lot Depth 130 feet 127 to 543 feet 11 lots are 127 feet deep while 7 lots exceed 5 Side Setback 10 feet 10 feet the Garage Setback6 feet 6 feet R -4 standards. 3 Min. Lot Area 11,400 sq /ft 11,405 to Conforms to R -4 lot area standards street — comer 1,598 sq /ft 4 Front Setback 35 feet 30 feet The reduced front yard setback allows houses/garages closer to the street and increases the rear yard area since 11 lots are 127 feet in depth. Sufficient space is provided to park at least two vehicles in each driveway. 5 Side Setback 10 feet 10 feet Conforms to R -4 setback standards. Garage Setback6 feet 6 feet Setback to 25 feet 25 feet street — comer lot 6 Rear Setback 30 feet 30 feet Conforms to R -4 setback standards. 7 Street Width 33 feet for 33 feet for Conforms to standard public street design public public 8 Cul De Sac 500 feet 598 feet Utilizes the land to its fall development length potential while still providing convenient and safe access for vehicles and pedestrians AKWD6O1VYE'R04"-- Carson Ridge Location 1885 6 A f 9/2 / 5 � 1 !_r1" � 4^212416 .d22]B61 3 . 1 6t i 81 i --. P14261 783 `75i y1— 1167 } !} 905 1<25�,.r�. 1123 v2cc>yd2nf 16237 i �W r 14315 16)66 Z 47A'D P ter._. Y b926% ti E 1 t i! S 668. '..0 f t 88 r CN 16255; 143[81 V'1 63"'ti�{( "490)x/ 896 1 ,,.•^'1G23B,/" ]881 7" 740 71C 692. r" ,.f Y , Qj� "� R179% ; �.._t.,._i.r.L�- i.-.�- r..al i Aemo <14uJ -i 1128 1106 •ti ¢ d251� ^RI) 'v 26 , T 1593 162 91 116] y� -"d` {W 61 731E L4 4 R27 �'"4�1F' �`, ti "` / It 755 7311' )0T 683 65963] v 16215 ,. e i 209 4,w 906 14208 ^!� 779 y 3 11A3 110] j16219' ?1az327�J�9a]�./0' " ldlso , ,(/ r s s IA2 AVE I4�ArO ^AV ,_1'..__.1 16m), t14220 .957i/A1' X916 \,�., y y 14181f �er^ 'y i i I i t ^-.._..219 \ , 92 1166 •.�." E 14 � �'7 +, s 974 Idl]8: y/' S 'H' )56 ]32 ]Oe 684 660 636 C12 14213 ?Q l �4 '� , ^. i 16195 c 9]T' F.r^., !`v •l1'._ - - -�-� "__I_ -S �.. a. 14191 `� .� ! r .. .,x.19 Llda r i'"'!. 1 , \' , 121614 t I ,rye 1120 1096-L41 B3 Mpg] * Qp'yt \ 14166 w 'J y 9adk ^'_ �W j J65 )211 685 k 6Gy' 63J 613 WL E �y.� 1I19011u -1 Lalm �,- .112 ",. y ♦ '4 16152 �- -I'_ "I L_ ���, 15121 16171 �9. .956 '+� °-- - "�0., _.._.' -_ «. ......_..- .- i.... A. V n 14110' 1097j; [ '' �' ` ^✓16138. "-- -� _ 741 ST LN _�, 1'1 ^. - ��. .1410 'g. ;6159 y r 14133 yI ( ( i 614,' / 1x19] -� �.,, 279 ! !� 1229 17 SrL Id16] 1 �' 9761 +,`. %� . "1d11B�/ �f� .1 16 32 758 736 710 1'861' 6621 638 J/ 2 \994 + `,v ;41n"'_.......e.. 1 L S 'r _ «. `� I'vlalis .. ! ^t ^.,� "�., i` 6' Iv� t 1 r `'^. a9`y !, 1 26 1 mar •�I 1118 3 1�.99d 1d0H1., 81]� 8231 )9]:y J59 )23 ®9 6]5 131 3 7096 / _ _f zz /wO 2 ®\ v '� vu9„ t., w. .. 1m]e h <,- -. 741ST AVE �_£ 141STAVE... 4 229 \ t 1 in 8401' X812 £]BS r 748 Jtd ]m c][\ i sbi t i s uv,J.' �1 1s1L i�snY• ea9' Sers: i S S I , is "3 r w1 ; 51s� �a�i?:Z4c3 ,, 14ocs i .tiG1 763 ;349. ]45 y]09 Rm Cl 1 31 coowcnEExw3nK 1 / 19311 , H LN��I40TH CN� i i r i �_ I f:. �� c29�^ : _�.,_L140TH N_a_._I_ _,� :.^ % 1'033 ,_ ..-� mB 13 i l. 9s1,�pT e9i ink i i y"� .-r ---„— IaoiH LN_ ?voTH / :2 4 5� 4 �H2 1s a', 1')i as9` o..� la�o21 .� , S i9iy 19s ,.,., S �`•, Ar., nck i. oeaS a,2o� 1'441' 3z� it 16020 L403s Lv..c icon/ l 1'a_. ��L� ��' � � � 99L'y.- SN- 1966 .. _ , / , "1. . .,531 s0i ns u5 �-a� .7 1.90.1 1 im29' 1 haoao: 1 1 s j 116030 h. f > 1 •^' 1143 108]. ! �. A958,/ /� •Y." �- /&g, 555 _y TH AVE 140TH AVE -� 1/ ;13271 . -a^"+� 1 1 iq� "�]3z `..1]S"'• ' , 60011' n, e)2 c ..• //. SQ032/ pALr 11013'4 / t ]]1r L,4019 Inn 1 L40Z2�014031.14028 q /(1A� ( I ...-1-1-11 i ..i ,NQ 1�' r'/ �iAK 317 �3s X 281 t„]AO lthr t. ..,, 140✓ t ` 111$ R /�! 3 {' 14013 QO 1/014,^ R Tt53G 1'121' 191. 2�43L 1��.,r13YC1• it X333' 90 1 Nov ...?. - '+'/i0ca i iooe' 981''. , " ... f f �C"./ t ��1 ti,iao3s�.... j4 ! 1am2 +., : �Pln2l�ipbia /' 1 s 14aT___N , (( R ;�, laozo }�mi6007��- -•_mlao23 »6, or9A� ; 1nlia L400cnQ `vom ( } moo'\- G",.r"Y39B2�24tx�s>�S'b�� auto" ', �!k 3�.��H LN�,,,,Y '1 izsc `�af_uH,�aw` ^� 291 i 5 1105 1081 VJ�A:,�j6y^�y139811 9z 4`— "'iv13 j 39 -`J� TH 1 / 43982 1�)L`r 13918,13 ?x',139053 .. t..._. , `. 1110 cw13A]1 Lms5 i 4 i 1�66^��L1.r51„a 13946' p 3��394dO 13911'1 $ I 111, 383) w., ^ ,�.,( i513J 1- .13931513910 y �13a 8037 1 jL3290 V 1,3978 AVE ~.�,J"I 3893 13892: 1 110f6 ' %13]9] 13]93 13880 ;1r 3881 t9561 3975 y g7A3.— 13870 13871 --1. Off; 3 x^13 `�^-•+ 1'13856 _13]88 I- " i 12813]81N 13)f]S '- - -r t�13]93 4, 1-1 j 13886�W�� L3em� L4235 13815'f 131 Cd,1 O�13 1383Y8 13 19ifj ' ( L36 3] -^# -`. f7 {13842 O A1� �13 "`. d�-' 13773 L1337)7c7 . 13890 %933 3985 �,. 13768 >I �{Q't 13810 1j B.Yj!I AVE i y~ 1850 A L123 / j.,13J63? 13800 , 5 S 8981 8]6 K -,••1 13790 ilN <•- ,1375 1 5"' � � 9UN KEP lA ....., "1 � = BUNKER IAKF BLVD „�. Y �, I BUNKER LAKE t zS / 9' LN74 13924 '13913 13916 i" ,. / I "6� R 1' t i 1 1' t .. t..._. , s UN� e3� r F SHAOOWOROOKWESr PARK~"` my em f BllNKER1LIF tbURSE , p ,.._. I BUNKER LAKE / 13236 13885 203 1 •1 W a _137TH n6 quo 1 I i i -'__ i o 11'770 5 .131A 796 22c W r SNAD7P/6Padf 9Ai3tK "137 y�q BUNKERWKEBLVp.. ., Disclaimer: Maps and documents made available to the public by the City of Andover are not legally recorded maps or surveys and are not intended to be used as such. The maps and documents are created as part of the Geographic Information System (GIS) that compiles records, information, and data from various city, county, state and federal resources. Copyright © 2013 City of Andover, All Rights Reserved Printed 08107/2014 m A 13 Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting DRAFT Minutes — August 11, 2014 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING: Consider the Preliminary Plat of the Carson Ridge Planned Unit Development —18 Lot Single Family Urban Residential Development Located at 14123 Prairie Road NW — TH Construction. City Planner Hanson noted the purpose of this item is to hold a public hearing and take input on the Preliminary Plat of the Carson Ridge Planned Unit Development. City Planner Hanson reviewed the proposed Preliminary Plat with the Commission. Commissioner Nemeth asked in regards to the cul -de -sac length, 500 hundred feet is the maximum that is usually set up. Mr. Carlberg stated that is a requirement of the sub- division code however there are several in the City that are longer where variances have been granted. Commissioner Nemeth asked if the City Works Department reviewed this and were there any comments regarding the 598 feet. Ms. Hanson stated they did not have any comments regarding the length of the cul -de -sac. Commissioner Gudmundson asked if there have been any changes made to the plans since last reviewed by them. Ms. Hanson stated there has not, the only thing that changed was it has now come back as a PUD. Commissioner Koehler stated when this was discussed in 2013, there was some question as to whether or not the developer had talked to adjacent property owners to see if there was property available for sale and he wondered if there was any information on this. Ms. Hanson indicated the developer could answer this question. Commissioner Peterson stated on Lot 6 it looks like there is a tree line which ends at Lot 7 and he wondered why this would stop and asked if they are planting additional trees on Lot 7. Ms. Hanson thought the builder could answer that question as well. Commissioner Peterson asked if there are additional enhancements on the plan since changing to a PUD. Ms. Hanson stated the enhancement is they are trying to save as many trees as possible along with some additional plantings and architectural standards will be higher than other areas. Commissioner Daninger stated in a PUD there is always give and take and he wondered what was in exchange by the developer for a PUD. He would like to hear from the developer in regards to this. Commissioner Nemeth wondered with the minimum lot depth change, 127 vs 130 feet, is there any concerns regarding safety or accessibility that came up when reviewed by staff. Ms. Hanson stated they do not have any concerns. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting DRAFT Minutes — August 11, 2014 Page 3 Commissioner Koehler asked if there is any reason why the setbacks and lot depth are set where they are besides aesthetics. He wondered if there was something the City was concerned about. Ms. Hanson stated there was not. Motion by Daninger, seconded by Koehler, to open the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Motion carried on a 7 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- absent vote. There was an email submitted from Thomas and Susan Chouinard, 14123 Prairie Rd NW regarding this item. Mr. Ed Gritton, 14157 Prairie Street, stated he had lots of concerns, most are personal. He stated he has been trying to market his property for the last ten to fifteen years without success. He stated his concern is this limits his ability to market his property. The other concerns have to do with their owning horses and he wondered what kind of problems this will cause to them personally with their livestock. It will create a financial issue for them because they are going to have to put up substantial fencing to secure their animals from the incoming neighborhood bordering their property. There are also other maintenance impacts such as what to do with the manure created. The biggest concern is the inability to market their property because of the way the plan is drawn up. Ms. Tricia Stanaway, 472 140th Lane NW, stated her concern is this is a big cul -de -sac with a lot of traffic coming out and her driveway will be at the end of the road. She stated there will be a lot of added traffic coming out and she wondered if there will be some additional traffic control at the intersection such as a three way stop sign or something else. She wondered if it would help with less houses or if they could not make it a cul -de -sac and bring the road out to Prairie Road, which would help alleviate some traffic coming through. Also on the corner of Ilex and 1401h Lane is a bus stop for elementary students and a safety concern for her. Mrs. Sandy Roselyn, 486 140th Lane NW, agreed with Ms. Stanaway. She stated there is also a family with three children and one of the children is special needs and they play in the cul -de -sac, which will now be Ilex Street and is a safety concern for her. Mrs. Jean Streeter, 289 141 st, stated their land abuts this property and there is a wetland area. They watched all of the trees across the creek being torn out and she wants to make sure the trees are not removed to the boundary on this property. She would like assurance that all the trees will not be removed because it is wildlife devastation. Mrs. Kathy Larson, Olive Street, felt the same way as the other residents. She stated they watched the entire corner be torn down and wildlife was not considered and she hopes the wildlife will be considered in this plan. She thought this will be a lot of houses thrown into a little area and Prairie Road is already a speedway. She wondered why this development is going in when the development on the corner has not even been started. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting DRAFT Minutes — August 11, 2014 Page 4 Mr. E. Ben Frederic, 609 142nd Avenue NW, stated it looks like the developers are using all that vacant land for a parking lot for equipment and he wondered what, if anything is going to happen soon. Ms. Hanson indicated she would update Mr. Frederic after the meeting. Mr. Tony Hennen, TH construction, 617 East Main Street, Anoka, was at the meeting to answer questions. Commissioner Daninger wondered what Mr. Hennen felt he was giving to get this PUD. Mr. Hennen indicated this is not a large development so there is not a lot more that can be done. They are going to be doing more tree plantings and also put nicer looking houses in there with the base point of $400,000. Mr. Hennen stated the tree line ends at Lot 7 because the City needs to have adequate drainage areas within the development. He noted he did not want to remove trees but was asked by the City Engineering Department to meet City standards. Commissioner Peterson stated it did not look like on Lot 6 any trees were planted or removed so the tree line might want to be continued from there. Mr. Hennen stated that could be a possibility depending on what the City wants. He did not see a problem with additional trees. He did not think there would be an issue with the horses because people like to look at them. He stated he would also work with the property owner on fencing. Commissioner Gudmundson wondered how the houses will be different than the ones east of this development. Mr. Hennen stated he would make sure they keep up the architectural standards and will be consistent with homes surrounding this development. Commissioner Gudmundson wondered if Mr. Hennen has talked to the property owner to the north about purchasing the parcel. Mr. Hennen stated he did talk to the owner's wife and she was not sure if they would want to sell seven feet to him or not. Commissioner Nemeth stated they received an email from Susan Chouinard, and she was not aware of a path or bike trail going in and she requested a fence be installed. He wondered if the residents were aware of a proposed trail going in. Mr. Hennen stated since the first sketch plan there was discussion with the Park Commission regarding a trail going in. Commissioner Nemeth wondered what the price point will be for the homes. Mr. Hennen stated it would be from $400,000 and up. Commissioner Nemeth stated he did not have a big issue with the back yard setback but the front setback concern him and he asked why Mr. Hennen would want the homes closer to the street. Mr. Hennen stated some of the Councilmembers were concerned with the smaller backyards so he suggested moving the homes five feet closer to the road to make the backyards larger. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting DRAFT Minutes — August 11, 2014 Page 5 Commissioner Nemeth stated the plan is showing two trees sitting on the corners of each lot and he wondered if this was where they were going to be planted. Mr. Hennen stated they would not be planted in the City Right -of -Way, it was just to show trees on the lots. Commissioner Koehler asked if there were any plans to put decks on the homes. Mr. Hennen stated decks may be added to the model homes but he would leave that up to the people purchasing the homes. Mrs. Roselyn stated the only concern of the neighbors is when Shadowbrook first went in the homes were in the $500,000 range and there were not many homes built so the price range went down. The sign out on Prairie Road stated homes will be starting at $300,000 and not $400,000. Their concern is that the houses will not sell at $400,000 and the developer will start to lower the house base to get people to purchase. She wondered how they could make the developer not lower the home values if they do not sell. Mr. Ed Gritton stated when the developer approached his wife for the additional seven feet of land and they approached their lender to see if they could sell or give the developer that property and the lender told them they could not do that. He stated with regard to the fencing, it will have to be something that will prevent toys and children from going into their property with the horses. Commissioner Daninger asked staff if the street width could be reduced to 33 feet. Mr. Carlberg stated they did not have any discussion about reducing the street width and there would also be an issue with the transition coming up Ilex Street. Commissioner Daninger asked if the shape of the cul -de -sac was due to the existing home there. Mr. Carlberg stated the location of where it stops is. The design of the bulb is for better lot design and requirements. Commissioner Daninger stated he wanted to make sure at the next meeting the ghost plat to the north is addressed. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the ghost plat adjoining this development. Chair Holthus asked when the traffic control plans be discussed. Mr. Carlberg reviewed with the Commission traffic control changes for the area. Motion by Gudmundson, Seconded by Nemeth, to continue the public hearing until the August 26, 2014 Planning Commissioner Meeting. Motion carried on a 7 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- absent vote. OTHER BUSINESS. Community Development Director Carlberg updated the Planning Commission on related items. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2013 Page 5 PUBLIC HEARING: Consider a Sketch Plan for an eighteen (18) lot urban residential development located at 14123 Prairie Road NW, as requested by TH Construction. City Planner Hanson noted the purpose of this item is to hold a public hearing and take input on a Sketch Plan for an eighteen (18) lot urban residential development located at 14123 Prairie Road NW, as requested by TH Construction. City Planner Hanson reviewed the proposed sketch plan with the Commission. Commissioner Holthus asked if the existing residence on Lot 1, Block 1 will stay. Ms. Hanson indicated it would. Commissioner Gudmundson asked north of the ghost plat, if this has been coordinated with this development. Ms. Hanson indicated it will not be as the Catcher's Creek project is north of Coon Creek.. Commissioner Peterson asked if Prairie Road will be reconstructed. Mr. Carlberg was not sure of the reconstruction schedule for Prairie Road but indicated there is no access plan for this development onto Prairie Road. Commissioner Holthus stated since Prairie Road is a collector street and State Aid road, does the State have any criteria as to how many side streets can have access to it. Mr. Carlberg stated they try to limit the number of accesses onto Prairie Road. Motion by Nemeth, seconded by Koehler, to open the public hearing at 7:57 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- present, 1- absent (Cleven) vote. Ms. Pixie Stockal, 601 140th Lane NW, stated her concern with this project is that all of the traffic will come onto 140th Lane and she wondered if there was a way they could do something so there is one egress into that development from Prairie Road because there will be a lot of traffic and there are currently a lot of children there. Mr. Carlberg stated there is a ghost plat and future development will warrant a future access onto Prairie Road and 140th does have capacity for additional traffic. Ms. Stockal asked if there was a way to slow the traffic down. Chairperson Daninger stated if there is an issue with speeding, the residents can contact the Sheriff's Department. Ms. Stockal wondered what will happen to the existing buildings on the property if this is developed. Mr. Carlberg indicated the applicant can address the question. Mr. Mark Madden, 14122 Prairie Road, stated he likes the sketch plan but his only concern is the fencing along Prairie Road. He thought the fences were atrocious and he Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —November 12, 2013 Page 6 wondered if there was a way to prevent fencing abutting major roadways. His concern will be with the new houses in this development will put up fencing that will look bad. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the City Ordinance with the Commission. He noted the problem is that there is no uniform fencing regulations so as long as the fence is maintained, any type of fence can be installed. He stated this has been a concern of the look of the community. lure. Todd Wold, 463 140`h Lane, asked if the developer is connected with the original Shadowbrook development. He was concerned because of the covenants in the existing development and if they will continue into this development. Mr. Ed Gritton, 14157 Prairie Road, stated he lived next to this property and one of his concerns is they own some horses and with the lot lines butting up to his lot line, what is he to anticipate with future homeowners and his horses, what will he be faced with. He wondered how he will be protected. Mr. Carlberg stated they have ordinances regarding keeping horses that also covers the manure management responsibilities of the horse owners that Mr. Gritton would have to comply with. Mr. Gritton stated the concern is the additional cost he may have to incur with manure maintenance. Mr. Carlberg stated if there will be an area where manure will be stored on the property he suggested moving it to the north or east on the property. Mr. Tony Hennen, 617 Main Street, Anoka, applicant, reviewed with the Commission the price point of homes he builds. Chairperson Daninger noted the covenants will be different than Shadowbrook because it is a different development. Commissioner Holthus asked if the existing home will remain, will it be reversed or what will happen. Mr. Hennen stated the house will stay as it is with the driveway coming off Prairie Road, it will be hooked up to City sewer and water, and the other buildings will be removed. Commissioner Peterson asked if the existing house is removed in the future and a new home is constructed, would there be enough frontage area off the cul -de -sac to build a new structure. IVIr•. Carlberg indicated there would be enough frontage on that site to build a new home. Commissioner Gudmundson asked if there will be covenants or restrictions on the development. Mr. Hennen indicated there will be covenants put in place but it will not be a continuation of the Shadowbrook development. Chairperson Daninger asked if a fence will be placed on the existing home facing Prairie Road. Mr. Hennen indicated that will be the front of the home so a tall fence cannot be placed along Prairie Road. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —November 12, 2013 Page 7 Mr. Madden asked how they can address the fence situation along Prairie Road. Chairperson Daninger indicated this issue was seen City wide but thought Mr. Madden may want to meet with City staff to discuss it further. Mr. Carlberg suggested going before the City Council and discuss it during resident forum or to call or email the Council. Mr. Jerry Stockel, 601 140th Lane, asked if they will be notified by mail for the next meeting. Mr. Carlberg stated this will go before the City Council on November 19rh but future meetings will have public notifications. Mr. Wold wondered how quickly the developer plans on moving forward with this project. Chairperson Daninger thought the applicant would want to start as soon as this project is approved. The applicant agreed. Motion by Holthus, seconded by Nemeth, to close the public hearing at 8:23 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- present, 1- absent (Cleven) vote. Chairperson Daninger did not think there was a big issue with the size of the development, but there was a little bit of an issue with traffic. Commissioner Gudmundson thought the development looked nice and wondered if there could be berming on Lot 9 along Prairie Road so a fence may not be needed. City Planner Hanson stated this item would be before the Council at the November 19, 2013 City Council meeting. PUBLIC NG: ConsiderAniendnzents to the City Code I2 -2 -2, Definitions; 12- 12, Permitted, irlitional and Prohibited Uses and 12 -14, Administration and Enforcement <��\ . Community Development Di ec or Carlberg noted the purpose of this item is to hold a public hearing and take input of Amendments to the City Code 12 -2 -2, Definitions; 12- 12, Permitted, Conditional and Prohibited Uses and 12 -14, Administration and Enforcement. Cormnunity Development Director Carlberg i-eviwed the proposed amendments with the Commission. Motion by Koehler, seconded by Nemeth, to open the pu - hearing at 8:33 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- present, 1 absent (Cleve>w ote. There was no public input. Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — November 19, 2013 Page 4 Motion by Knight, Seconded by Howard, to approve the Conditional Use Permit for telecommunications collocation on water tower #1 and the construction of a shelter located in Rose Park, 14057 Rose Street NW. Motion carried unanimously. (See Resolution RI 06-13) Mr. Carlberg indicated that staff will work with the applicant on Councilmember Howard's concerns. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW — 18 LOT SINGLE FAMILY URBAN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT —14123 PRAIRIE ROAD NW— TH CONSTRUCTION Mr. Carlberg stated the City Council is asked to review a residential sketch plan for an 18 -lot single family urban residential development as requested by Mr. Tony Hennen of TH Construction. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the staff report with the Council Mayor Gamache asked if Plan B would place the homes closer to the front of the lot and not the back. Mr. Carlberg stated the standard 35 foot front yard setback could be maintained with this plan. They would be losing three feet off the back of the yard. Mayor Gamache stated the back yards will be backing up to another back yard and because it is only three feet, he wondered if it is better to move the house forward three feet because the entire neighborhood will be that way rather than shortening the back yard. Councilmember Trude stated that would require a PUD because it is a lot of variances. She did not know if they wanted to lower the community standard that much. Councilmember Trude thought the sketch plan is trying to get too much into a little amount of land. She wondered if this developer could try to purchase land from adjacent property owners. Mr. Carlberg stated the developer has met with the adjoining property owner and they have not come to an agreement for purchase. Mr. Carlberg stated there are a couple of options to be looked at. One is to grant variances, another is to look at doing a PUD with options of landscaping or berniing and enhanced design standards. The City Council and staff reviewed options for the sketch plan to see what could possibly be done to improve the development without granting variances. Mayor Gamache asked if it requires this development to be a PUD because of the variances. Mr. Carlberg indicated it did not, the lots can be granted a depth of a three -foot variance in the back yard and when they come to preliminary plat, the lots will be listed with a three -foot variance. These are buildable lots but they are not able to gain the necessary property to meet the minimum lot depth requirements. Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes— November 19, 2013 Page 5 Councilmember Trude thought it was an economic reason and stated this could be a development that met all of the City's requirements if it were not for the eight additional lots. Mr. Carlberg stated the Council could require this to be a PUD and ask the developer for berming or landscaping as a part of it. Councilmember Trude thought by doing a PUD, a precedent would not be set. She stated three feet could be quite a difference in a backyard when they abut homes. She thought this was imposing a lot on the existing neighborhood. Councilmember Howard stated he would be comfortable with the developer doing this if Lots 8 and 9 were shifted a little bit to give the lots more than the required buildable space because then they get something for letting the lots be little bit shorter. He indicated he is still comfortable with the project. Councilmember Howard thought the lots lines could be pushed to the west to allow more space for the internal lots. Councilmember Knight wondered if Lots 10 -14 were elongated east to west would that help. Mayor Gamache thought that would take care of just one side of the road. Mr. Carlberg noted the only thing that could be done would be to shift the road and either make one side comply and the other side a greater deviation or variance. But, bigger lots cannot be created by pushing them east or west, the problem is with north and south. Councilmember Howard stated there is the opportunity to go wider with the house rather than deeper. Mr. Carlberg agreed but noted it would not meet the lot depth minimum. He explained the lots need depth because they do not meet the 130 feet. They meet the buildability requirements, the width and the area because they went a little wider to make up for the deviation in depth; the only deviation is the three -foot depth. Councilmember Trude thought seventy-five percent of the lots need some kind of a variance and there should be some amenity or something similar to a PUD. Otherwise, the City standards will mean nothing and she is concerned about that. Mayor Gamache stated he would be fine with the front being moved forward because they have always pushed the front yards back more than other cities. He thought in order to make it fit the neighborhood behind this development, they need to make the back yard the proper size. Mr. Carlberg thought it sounded like a PUD was the right way to go to make this fit into the neighborhood but the question would be, what is the benefit to the City by allowing the deviation or new standard. Councilmember Trude thought this needed to go PUD because if the requirements for a variance were looked at they could not justify that it was not economic. She thought Mayor Gamache had some points that would be acceptable to people who live in the area and increasing the density of plantings would make it match some of the neighboring properties. In addition, maybe they look at the fence issue that was brought up at the Planning Commission meeting. She is also Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes — November 19, 2013 Page 6 concerned with the trail connection taking out a lot of trees. She thought this should go back to the drawing board. Councilmember Knight agreed. Councilmember Howard indicated this should likely be a PUD with some amenities given to the City. Mayor Gamache stated there was discussion about a trail that runs along the creek. Councilmember Trude stated the trail makes a nice walking loop for people in the area and she would hate to see trees lost because of the trail but thought the developer could come back with a PUD with additional plantings and preserve the space in the back yard with the existing homes. Mr. Hennen indicated he would review his options based on the Council input. NAMING OF 40 ACRE SPORTS COMPLEX13 53 5 —1 611T AVENUE NW112 -31 Mr. B'e�owitz stated the City Council is requested to approve the naming of the 40 Acre Sports Mr. Berkowitz`reviewed the staff report with the Council. Mayor Gamache thought one of the things they lack in the City is a tie to the history of the City. He thought it was import nt they begin to look at this. He stated the land was previously owned by Mr. Royce Bennett and ey should seriously think about tying back to some of the people that started this City when it was �ikow Township, going back and bringing some of those names into the places now being used. \. Councilmember Tiede stated she liked-the Park Commission's idea of using the name of the family that owned the land on the trail through the woods or one of the fields but when it comes down to it, it is hard to find where the fields are. She thought the idea of the suggested name "Pine Hills North" was a good name. Councilmember Knight stated he liked the name "Veteran's Memorial." Councilmember Trude thought there were plans to put a park on Veterans Memo zal Boulevard. Councilmember Howard liked tying back to tradition. The City Council felt this item should be discussed when all the ouncilmembers are at the meeting. \, Mr. Dickinson indicated staff would bring the topic back at the second coupcil meeting in January. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT City Staff updated the Council on the administration and city department activities, legislative 13 -3 -10: REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS: Administrative approval of incidental changes in the PUD may be authorized by the City Planner upon review and approval by ARC. Such administrative approvals shall not substantially alter the character of the approved PUD and shall be limited to landscaping (not including quantity reduction), color schemes (not including materials), association documents, fencing, entrance monuments and decks. Changes in uses or development/design standards must be submitted for a full public hearing review process. (Amended Ord. 314,10 -4 -2005) 13 -3 -11: DESIRABLE PUD DESIGN QUALITIES: The following design qualities will be sought in any PUD: A. Achieves efficiency in the provision of streets and utilities and preserves area to achieve the elements of design qualities described in this chapter. B. Provides convenient and safe access for vehicles and pedestrians and all types of activity that are anticipated to be a part of the proposed development. C. Provides a buffer between different uses, adjacent properties, roadways, between backyards of back -to -back lots. D. Preserves existing stands of trees and /or significant trees. E. Provides considerable landscaping treatments that complement the overall design and contribute toward an overall landscaping theme. F. Preserves significant usable space on individual lots or through the provision of open space within the development. G. Provides an attractive streetscape through the use of undulating topography, landscaping, decorative street lighting, decorative mailbox groupings, retaining walls, boulders, fencing, area identification signs, etc. H. The proposed structures within the development demonstrate quality architectural design and the use of high quality building materials for unique design and detailing. The lasting quality of the development will be ensured by design, maintenance and use guidelines established through an owners' association. (Ord. 298, 8 -4 -2004) 13 -3 -12: APPROVAL OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: The developer must demonstrate that the amenities and qualities of the Planned Unit REZONE REQUEST FROM R -1 SINGLE FAMILY RURAL TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CARSON RIDGE JUNE 20, 2014 SUBMITTED BY TH CONSTRUCTION OF ANOKA, INC. C/O TONY HENNEN 617 EAST MAIN STREET ANOKA, MN 55303 763 - 422 -8809 DESIGNER/SURVEYOR HAKANSON ANDERSON, INC. 3601 THURSTON AVENUE ANOKA, MN 55303 763 - 427 -5860 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. PROJECT OVERVIEW ........................................................... ..............................1 B. PURPOSE AND INTENT ....................................................... ............................... 1 C. SITE CONDITIONS AND LOCATION ................................. ............................... 1 D. ZONING .................................................................................. ............................... 1 E. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ............................................ ..............................1 F. LANDSCAPING ..................................................................... ............................... 2 G. HOME DESIGN STANDARDS ............................................. ............................... 2 TC -1 A. PROJECT OVERVIEW The site is an existing property being used as a rural residence. This residential property was created by the subdivision of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25 many years ago. The property should be properly platted and this plan is for an urban residential development. The PUD (Planned Unit Development) is a tool to ensure that the best use of the property will occur and public interest will be benefitted. B. PURPOSE AND INTENT The land use plan for the property was prepared with the following objectives: • To promote an aesthetically pleasing residential development with consideration given to building materials, vegetation, and site layout. • To create a pedestrian bike connection to the Prairie Road trail from the development. • To avoid as much as possible any negative impact to the existing residential area. • To preserve the existing wetlands and trees on the property and conform as much as possible to existing development standards. C. SITE CONDITION AND LOCATION The property borders Prairie Road on the west, the residential subdivision of Shadowbrook on the south, a rural home site to the north and wetlands /Coon Creek to the east. It is the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Twp. 32, R25. It contains an existing home on outbuildings along Prairie Road. The existing home will remain and the outbuilding will be removed. Vehicle Access to the newly developed lots will be from Ilex Street NW, which was stubbed in along with sewer and water connections for this project during the Shadow Brook development. Vehicles will come into the site from Prairie Road by turning off on Juniper Street, and taking 1401h Lane NW to Ilex Street NW. D. ZONING The property is currently zoned as R -1 Single Family Rural. Property to the south and west is zoned as R4 — Single Family Urban and to the north is R -1, Single Family Rural. The proposed zoning is R -4 Single Family Urban/PUD. E. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The setbacks and standards proposed are the same as the R4 District except the front yard setback will be 30 feet instead of 35 feet. The corner Lot street setback will be 25 feet instead of 35 feet also. The home styles will be such to minimize the distance from the front of the garage to the front of the home. This will increase the distance from the real lot line to the rear of the home. The street was built so that lots abutting Prairie Road would be served and connected to 14151 Avenue NW backing now or in the future to Prairie Road. F. LANDSCAPING The wooded areas on the west side of the project around the existing home, the south line of the property and wherever possible will be preserved. Trees will be planted as per species and location per the attached Attachment A. G. HOME DESIGN STANDARDS The homes built in this development will be enhanced architecturally to provide an aesthetically pleasing environment for its residents. Attached B includes samples of home styles, facade and colors typical for those to be built. Page 2 pELINEATION Cr TREE LINE PROTECION SHALL IDEALLY BE LaCATEO AT THE OUIE11 PERIMETER Or THE ORIPLIML TPEELINE Fl EYAD VIEW NOS- SCE WOOOLOT TREE PROlECT10N V DELINEATION \ '�l ) TREE MTEMON �JE MIN R' MIN DELINEATION IEEE PROTECDON 1. STMOARa 4R' NIGH SNOW FENCE OR GMxOE WRY DELINEATION FORCE. 2. CAUTION RIBBON 4" WIDE MAY K USED AS PASSIVE TREE PROTECTIN OR APPROVED EQUAL PAEIVE THEE PRCTION MAY SSAW AREAS WNIMMME REMOVE FROM AREAS Or LAND DISTURBANCE S. STEM. IosTs AS NEEDED. L DEEINFATHN+ M TREE LINE PROTECTION SHALL EXTEND ,,,,,MOUSEY WINDOW PROTECDON AREAS. TOTALLY suRRMmO INOMMIAL SPECIMENS AS Nom OR EXTEND AEAOSS WE rACE AND THE ENDS SHALL EXTEND B' BACK FOR INDMDUAL TREE LINE PROTECTION. 1 1 10' WIN. _J e TREE SAVE I2- MIN. AREA 1' 1. MGM To Be PLACE loo' a.L MONO FORCE WAa WOODED LOT AREA, ON INMVIDUAL SPECIMENS WHERE NOTED, ARM ONE ON EACH TREE LINE AREA TO BE SAVEL MONS TO BE AFFIXED TO STEEL POETS. 2. AM PASSIVE TREE PROTECTOM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED W ••KEEP OUT' GR "TREE SAVE AREA" SIONAQE IYPIEA! 9CN xw[ LEG= ® TREE SAYE AREA TREE PROTECTION DELINEATION Q ,J('f/ NEW THEE PLANTINO PER vs CITY REQUIRCI6MS It GFIMIAL RMEM 1. ALL TREES SNOWN SHALL K PRIMEREM 2. � «E WB , M�M M GGGL WoNo, WOOOLMR, 9I 0EW OT DELINEATION A"goiAL NY THE ENOII S. ERECT PROTECTIVE OETEEAMIM coNnmumw ALONG DRIP LINE Or SIGNIFICANT TRW MDM6T TO STREET RIOHIS-OE -WAY. FINN. LOCATION E' DEUMEATNNI SIIBIECT TO APPROVAL BT ENW6ER IN T16 FlELO. BCUK INSRGTUR TO MILK POSTS AT A MEANT Or 4 FEET. 4. EAdNO SHALL COMMERCE ONLY AFTER PROTEOM TREASURES HAVE BEGH COIMEIED AMD ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN M LFED ON PRF NW N SERVAT TECIOUES AND PROCEMMEL S. NO MEMTM FOR a1mERaROURm ammo s,,LL K PEMRr1m ON WE YMOGIIMM MoE or PROTECTIVE DELBIEAMIM• L IF PRIMING 6 MEratAMIT. PRIRMM IA LL BE DONE BY PRM6EIONAL3 GYRING APPRO "HATE MINING MEMBER FOR SPEdB T. OM M O G TIM w11NM FOG ALL STS or TREE REPLACEIIENr RESULTING FROM L CMITRACM THROUGHOUT R@pNgME O �MAHADTTAINtlM POMECIM DELINEATION AIM SIGNS IN GOOD WAIR f. ALL UTWIIES INSTALLED AS PMT of THE OEVTLML6NT WILL K VRMN STREET WORTS -OF -WAY DR UTILIrc EABOrtNn. IL IXY11TAtt IIIE Rm FORESTER (ENGINEERING M ARORN» AT ]MM -Mim TO ARRANGE A PRSCONSIMICBGN GENENEMC[ MIIH Me CDT fOKSTER/TREE BMPECTM PMOR TO AMT LANG MOURBARCL 11. ALL I= P NMCMW IWMSLIR6 SNNL RC RIVALLED PRNM TO BUILDING CONSIRUCDOM. IL ORANGE POLY SAFETY FON:E aft ORANGE MOLT FENCE SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE CUM POBYEIG OF THE GRN'LR6 M AS DIRECTED ry CITY FOREMEN. ROLMICE M016; Q ALL OTHER TREE PROTECNON SHALL K PASSIVE ��I NTTF�`�IA►V'O'��'�7A� „��'� I ., _�rO,yp ,CJ .►.rJ��� ►�J����� �� .v ►J.14���.�JJJ'l, Pp: O�A►'� 1`♦ ��Jt..00 tJ ll� 1. 4�R �!`��J 4G�.�,)S *O.,a ��� ��2:C�. ►��G�:S�9�C� ✓O���y��►C �c�i v`�O °.G:.�. •: i, _ _ ..v...t...G_. i_....A.F 1 11n ►0 ►10 .! f P Ada.►♦ r � e1 ^011 ,f- 7 ' � • iL+�� `• tV 11 5; is i!,•_ —_ '_ °;��. 'il +i •• ���� \.��� ��i ��I NTTF�`�IA►V'O'��'�7A� „��'� I ., _�rO,yp ,CJ .►.rJ��� ►�J����� �� .v ►J.14���.�JJJ'l, Pp: O�A►'� 1`♦ ��Jt..00 tJ ll� 1. 4�R �!`��J 4G�.�,)S *O.,a ��� ��2:C�. ►��G�:S�9�C� ✓O���y��►C �c�i v`�O °.G:.�. •: i, _ _ ..v...t...G_. i_....A.F 1 11n rye. b` TREEUNE Ff F VATION VIEW NO SLA E 1 10. MIN. _ I (^ 1 J•1 TREE SAVE I2' MIN. i AREA 11' DELINEATION OF TREE LNIE PROTECTION SHALL IDEALLY BE PLACE 100' O.C. ALONG FENCE THRU WOODED BE LOCATED AT THE OUTER 1. SIGN TO PERIMETER OF THE ORIPUNE. LOT AREA. ON INDMDUAL SPECIMENS WHERE NOTED. AND ONE ON EACH TREE LINE AREA TO BE SAVED. SIGNS TO BE AFFIXED TO STEEL POSTS. 2, ALL PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION MUST BE ACCOMPANICO BY "KEEP OUT" OR "TREE SAVE AREA" SIGMACE. ,� \ /�/{��= /T�1 /J�]� TYPICAL SICN TREE PROTECTON V WOODLOT OCLINCATION \ �C' -T- TREE PROTECTION �a%�6' NIN 6' 41N< DELINEATION 1 TREE PROTECTION 1. STANDARD 18' HIGH SNOW PENCE OR ORANGE SAFETY OEUNEATION 2. CAUTION RIBBON A" WIDE MAY BE USED AS PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION OR APPROVED UTILIZED PASSIVE TREE SAVE PROTECTION MAY ONLY BE AGTE F TO AREAS OF TREE SAVE AREAS WHICH ARE REMOTE TROM AREAS O! W10 3. STEEL POSTS AS REEOED. A. CONTINUOUSLY OF TREE LINE PROTECTION SHALL EXTEND SURROUND U D IN THROUGH SPECIMENS AREAS. TOTALLY SURROUND INDIVIDUAL THE EN AS NOTED. OR EXTEND ACROSS THE PACE AND THE FM03 SHALL EXTEND 8' BACK FOR INDIVIDUAL TREE LINE PROTECTION. LEGEND TREE SAVE AREA TREE PROTECTION DELINEATION ( 101 NEW TREE PLANTING PE CITY REQUIREMENTS TREE REMOVAL AREA TREES TO BE REMOVED ElWETUND OPEN SPACE R b® ScML w R<T GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL TREES SHOWN SHALL BE PROTECTED. 2. NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS. OPERATION OF MACHINERY. OR DEVELOPMENT Of ANY SORT WILL OCCUR WITHIN THE WOODLAND 510E Of PROTECTIVE DELINEATION WITHOUT APPROVAL BY 111E ENGINEER. 3. ERECT PROTECTIVE DELINEATION CONTINUOUSLY ALONG DRIP LINE Of SIGNIFICANT TREES CLOSEST TO STREET RIGHTS -OF -WAY. FINAL LOCATION OF DELINEATION SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY ENGINEER IN THE FIELD. SECURE DELINEATION TO METAL POSTS AT A HEIGHT Of A FEET. 1. GRADING SHALL COMMENCE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BRIEFED ON PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES. 3. NO TRENCH FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE PERMITTED ON THE WOODLAND BIDE Of PROTECTIVE DELINEATION. 6. IT PRUNING IS NECESSARY, PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON FOR SPECIES. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS OF TREE REPLACEMENT RESULTING FROM OAMADE TO TREES WITHIN PROTECTEO AREAS. S. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PROTECTIVE DELINEATION AND SIGNS IN GOOD REPAIR THROUGHOUT DURATION Of PROJECT. S. ALL UTILITIES INSTALLED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE WRNIN STREET RIGHTS -Of -WAY OR UTILITY EASEMENTS. 10. CONTACT THE CITY FORESTER (ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT) AT 755 -5100 TO ARRANGE A PRECONSTRURION CONFERENCE WITH THE CITY FOBESTER/TREE INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBANCE. 11. ALL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BUILDING COPISTRUCTION. 12. ORANGE POLY SAFETY PENCE OR ORANGE SNT PENCE SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE DRIPLINE OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY FORESTER. REFERENCE NOTES: (1 ) ALL OTHER TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PASSNE. DATE REV15IOx Hakanson Anderson OVERALL TREE PUN ".� .. CNN EnRlnnn .ne n.YCARSON RIDGE sMM 5601 TH.n1.O M... An.Y.. uI,I,W.m. ss3D3 PUD ATTACHMENT A JB3 -w -sego Tex T6a- 12J -GUG CITY Or ANDOVER, MINNESOTA www.N.Y.m.n- .nd.n.n.mm ATTACHMENT A C I T Y O F NDOVE 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 m (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 m WWW.ANDOVERMN GOV City of Andover Tree Planting Recommendations Pmm n bale fat cents branch" Utz NOT anka ur WMP tnmk unkm fe d"aoy cu ak*V M ba" apes %""Qvs %P'4 WM Pnnt rmu g *Vdch am water spom PhMm bcukain brtmdrsm Peuht suchwe Y'-X mukh kqs awmy 0-,Sm Ircrnk WOM wall •a u � i '• 4� c H vs PemitYy titc�dia 104W to WX1arM GOIQ fi4YRR here MaR lttdAhng ROM& Cn9fhiYlm'r a nd Cla .._e � � CPO* *I wmdat Caid Da etaWd rm" A ClaWJFgyh, Ora* wwc t too* F at f N Laaria edid tol pEdaktal - do rid 4q dpWer Wam bM daP4h osy We 2-3 SIM" -s 4.a WUN Hardwoods 1. red maple (Acer rubrum) 23. butternut (Juglans cinerea) 2. silver maple (Acer saccharinum) 24, black willow (Salix nigra) 3. sugar maple (Acer saccharum) 25. ironwood or eastern hornbeam 4. bittemut hickory (Carya cordiformis) (Ostrya virginiana) 5. paper birch (Betula papyrifera) 26. showy mountain ash (Sorbus decora) 6. yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis) 27. serviceberry (Amelanchier spp) 7. river birch (Betula nigra) 28. blue beech (Carpinus caroliniana) 8. northern pin oak (Quercus ellipsoidalis) 9. northern red oak (Quercus rubra) 10. bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa) Softwoods 11. eastern white oak (Quercus alba) 1. eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) 12. American elm (Ulmus americana) 2. red pine (Pinus resinosa) 13. rock elm (Ulmus thomasii) 3. jack pine (Pinus banksiana) 14. slippery elm (Ulmus rubra) 4. white spruce (Picea glauca) 15. quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) 5 black spruce (Picea mariana) 16. bigtooth aspen (Populus grandidentata) 6. tamarack (Larix laricina) 17. balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera) 7. northern white cedar (Thuja 18. American basswood (Tilia americana) occidentalis) 19. hackberry (Celtis occidentalis) 8. balsam fir (Abies balsamea) 20. black cherry (Prunus serotina) 21. choke cherry (Prunus virginiana) 22. pin cherry (Prunus pensylvanica) 23. American plum (Prunus americana) tf c war laadset 1 +- DO era r�s lems4rul .�, tta0tr ar bearreh iJQs Pmm n bale fat cents branch" Utz NOT anka ur WMP tnmk unkm fe d"aoy cu ak*V M ba" apes %""Qvs %P'4 WM Pnnt rmu g *Vdch am water spom PhMm bcukain brtmdrsm Peuht suchwe Y'-X mukh kqs awmy 0-,Sm Ircrnk WOM wall •a u � i '• 4� c H vs PemitYy titc�dia 104W to WX1arM GOIQ fi4YRR here MaR lttdAhng ROM& Cn9fhiYlm'r a nd Cla .._e � � CPO* *I wmdat Caid Da etaWd rm" A ClaWJFgyh, Ora* wwc t too* F at f N Laaria edid tol pEdaktal - do rid 4q dpWer Wam bM daP4h osy We 2-3 SIM" -s 4.a WUN 1 �e• "'' e..t,, � a •}...iJ, ;� err, L .. y arm .J rd,ll 1 'I 1 1 I I: 1 I1 I •II I! " I I J1 IJ 1 1 ® p1 } t b ■ II .n 3- �I• r i�, +' L1 r 1 4 AA• I y � f. U Na c, ;y�� ♦ � 1 f: Y L. .r d.:'yr� ♦'1' S�r' ��•. �� .f ,. ''4,'n. � .a ',, r l , rig � � ♦�' "!"� ""4Y ar a \�:h ,,)��; • r w fl 1.�, !^ ?�� , r, T'. 1 f�`�, AYE 4 • .1 I'� ' 4��� h rx�f ,t ♦ tex�trVlh' q"��! , rPa a1x anY7{'"i ,1,� ♦. ., •/ . :� 1 •� q�!y. a }`i� ` ;r �rfi aY,,l ':a,,f -tr• VS tia ol r1 1 bt w ..J wm- ;; ',5, µ'+ •! �M � . ��(i�� r� � .q. ,y, r r:.i S �j - �• I ., x �_. ♦ � F r .�..,�. .� r :l.l�^ .. �'. i'_ is ._ �F }E 4i�. F' ify i �[ [[� } F � .. 4� .F" ��__ ' .. � .. i.,: _.�, __. ....... _ � .. {; ' •' V� �: w: �. _ _ 4.... 1r .;. � ✓^ _ ., - _. . - .� ' a: ie. rY '• r•V �. +f :a: ... ..�:r,. r ;; ',5, µ'+ + .. 1 AV Ef y 1 i ` f 1 t a- C'1 I Y P , . I -- I -- - - " AWN 0 LT, 5 ri 0 LT, 5 i . ��. � ti ',�. yW iv �,x � i r1 % : y'` }� ' � 1 ri �' r, ,, ,, _.. __ __ :_ ��� AM J 1� 1 � .1 � rd. Lr- P 1 1 1 AM J 1� .1 Lr- .I f tl 11' jJ p AM Cav -sor, V:,c�e �I e. Stephanie Hanson From: Susan Chouinard (schouinard @mybwbank.com) Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 8:51 AM To: Stephanie Hanson Subject: Public Hearing Carson Ridge Preliminary Plat Dear Stephanie /Planning and Zoning Commission, We would like this to be added to the public record for the public hearing for Carson Ridge Preliminary Plat on Monday August 11, 2014, at Andover City Hall. We are the current owners of the existing home on this plat. We believe this development is nicely platted and should be a beautiful addition to the neighborhood. We do have one concern. With talking to the developer at first there was never a mention about a bike /walking path. We do understand this was a request /requirement by a committee at the city. Our request of the city /developer would be to put a privacy fence along the bike /walking trail on the north side of our house, as it will be very close to our home. There are several reasons for this request... 1. Privacy 2. People throwing garbage, cans, etc. into our yard. 3. Dogs defecating in our yard and people leaving it there. 4. Kids, adults going onto our property and trespassing being nosey or most importantly getting hurt. 5. Personally talking to the developer and basically being told if you want a fence you put one in. Please understand that we have lived here since 1984 and Tom grew up in this home since it was built in 1972. We have enjoyed our privacy and hope to continue to with a privacy fence with new neighbors and feel more like a neighborhood for us. Respectfully Submitted, Thomas and Susan Chouinard 14123 Prairie Road NW Andover, MN 55304 612 - 750 -3694 (Sue's cell number) (h x1.. eN � . w PATE REVISION oE51CRF� M Preliminary Plat Hakanson hereby certify that thie eurvry, plop or report waa prepared by me or undar my duly o. 6 to u R s s R E uaE k ufuY duww o¢ D er ec K ^• Of "• direct eupery eion and that I am o L{censed Profeesionof Land Surveyor under J • E J: UII EM BaoK 1� �= CARSON RIDGE Anderson the la of hyft o Nl nesola. ,� P ^+ for CIN EneM�,• o, va E•na vwo S] Charles R. Christopherson alE oJ/ +o /It e l _ .L.. [�... 763-427- 5860 FAX 763 -427-052 Date 0.1 /10/14 Na. 18420 i1LE W. 307A4 (h x1.. eN � . w LEGEND i REFERENCE NOTES: _ 1Q ABANDONING THE WATER FAUCET SHALL •• EXISTING CONTOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARY CONFORM TO ALL LOCAL, STATE AND PROPERTY LINE FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS. I C - RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE w DELINEATED WETLANO TREE LINE \ /1 FEMA DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES NW 141ST LANE N l _ _ \ 100 -YEAR FLOOD FRINGE BOUNDARY :: ••FEMA 500 -YEAR FLOOD FRINGE BOUNDARY GAS LINE — - - - / — T-,-J BURIED TELEPHONE LINE F r1 OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE l , U TELEPHONE PEDESTAL lot / G LIGHT POLE POWER POLE GUY WIRE w EXISTING CATE VALVE 1 i C EXISTING HYDRANT 5531 > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER L % eiisii 1r 1 EXISTING WATERMAIN sUENCE 0 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE — -I _ >(r I I ' / REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER / °= -' J� /' "/ ! I I •' /' WIRE FENCE i EX1STlNC SIGN 50 0 50 100 SCALE N FEZ NN it SAWCUT AND o a-- i�_ ... i 41 ' ° _ -�aa •iL- REMOVE BITUMINOUS3;� vV `° - // t I� 1_� \V •ice i PAVEMENT / �4 a - ', / _ ! - ` V �� I I SAWCUT AND / Q /y, 4; / / J ' / \•, "= c- "- - - -- "� - REMOVE CONCRETE ` .. � SAWCUT AND GUTTER � ' c'J - BITUMINOUS PAVEMENL EXISTING BUILDING `< < •�\ I �\ _ \ /\, rJ . 3 � SHcD SAWCUT, REMOVE AND ,AND ( �8 / ' - S MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PER CITY STANDARD DRAWING N0. 520 CLEAR AND i GRUB TREE var -... REMOVE KENNEL 3R �. A r 1% AI ii� AND ABANDON \ r`. I, - _ 1 - / •\ WATER FAUCET'» CLEAR AND `\ / ` GRUB TREESV / o I c I r SHEDS 91M1L�nC- ..� w J J / �TYP.� /" _ r _. r r ��• ., - - _ 'S4 _�\ I 11 r \ - - _ \ ` // '' -- /�: "// iSo� /� 1 _ - .` •_ I / / lG - `nom\ ______ I / r Il ( J � : ' -�� f - _ _ __ ' /�,�. / / � / /�/ � •Gr`•1 � _I ` _.. K /�(�' —. `` il./ � � __ L+. =.\ i�1= _ `— I i � ` _ j; I,. d0r SAWCUT, REMOVEI AND MILL I I BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PER CITY STANDAPD n I - \, DRAWING N0. 52d �� �I I �� ��� -- - - -- - -- L - - -- 1 L - - -� I - - - -- - - -- --- "I- - -I� / 140TH LANE NW urgnj -e74G. ` I �t DATE j REVISION + h..eb, oerlll, +ho, Inx plan, x,ecL'icelion, or ..,o� ,.a ZK. )7; -- - EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND SHEET - 5 , IJ CIT7 gEVIE'N , , ..d b, r,. e.:,nde. m, „:, xup,.v',on and Ih.1 I Hakanson Anderson 6 18 la LITY REVIEW 1 d''l, Lu• .,s:d Pml- vianet Engl... ued.r the I,., TAE _ 6 or the Smle o• unr• o ccn. ;.. - CIvII Engineers and Land Su"e ors CARSON RIDGE of ' - TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 REMOVALS PLAN - -- - - 763- 427 -5860 FAx 763- 427-0520 CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 9 I �YJIEL�FNI �,LP.•. ccn n: _ w«w.hakenson- anderson.com Date 3110J14 � Lic. Na, 43362 CJJ 3637.04 / I 1 890.0 E" SNG' V`,` / Y ode �d I \.\ ��. _ ,Rc510ENCE `B.p \ e e P d \ •_ �_ _ LOW AREA N0.11 -aaa '. ro a ss m \ _- '" F � J� gam.• r / /, / 1 I I � � S /�` - � NGWZ =88215 I / •. '� \ ° ? o TYPE III BARRICADE \ UTLET =884.5 / SEE•, �\Q \ � \ �\ \PER CITY STANDARD 1 693_ _ 100- YR-CWL =88 §.7 r0TE.( \DRAWING NO. 509 E.O.F. / 40 y'r, 900 11�~�j+' �_ ess_ � __ _ ____ - ��_` � �, •.\ \, �\ \ / i I' - 8''BITUMINOUS- Q ; f ✓l m �:,�� 7��2r TRAIL 1 0 FEMA BASE FLOOD .I ELEVATION =878.. . �. Si����l : v+ f ao.\ CONCRETE RC CRB 8618 / . 00.° / F"`� Y .10 I 11 { 13 ;,1 \ 9 ". "+ } c...4" ` -5 \ •;. \ COON CREEK ATLAS 14 GUTTER PERIMN DOT / / • ..tom m /eiht/ AFB Ot. _ _ tea' T ?: ! I SEE FLOOD ELEVATION =878.5 _ U !. �J \,grON s1' �S FB FBt l;, \GF -845'j / 89q.,- _QQF e951- m 1 •,1 �) / INOTE Q3 ^�\•• / / ✓. /\ v C 5 STANDARD PLATE 7100 �" GF 85• GF =897.5 GF 8$65 L 6915\ -. La�943' // �� s k � ;�/..! LF =89 - \ i h ,w �gYf _I ad. abe3 [F-eet�l'. \ ` c ".;. f� -7 -�I •> CON STRUCT'CHECK ^� / /G DAM PER z \ _1.69 Y-6II ¢� �I 1\ \\ \ >n'y ,� • \\ / � .fy ^ -`` i as. �Iw� ..r -r�l ill -e c\� - -t I i� e iTi a ••i� i .\ :Fs` ' \.\g -\ / 003 RECONSTRUCT STREET-'TO-THE nr l ' 14fS I > ',+ 1 ..1,` • I fdAIL80 I \ 1 \ \ 3 EXISTING SECTION / `° r �� 1 1 °Og 6 T AV NW I g6 6 6 4 r - LUST R t \ • + '\ / 1, 1 1 NGWL- jINFILTRATION- .BASIN POND `\� � NCWL =876.0 9 ; 72.4. . {, B9 =� o i 69 \ >\ r _ � ra' 2. \ ' BOTT0M=880.0 "469 -' -7 /�1. ��m£ p \ \j NWL=88 j.0 -� �„eo ,rT \ \ 100 -YR IHWL =6831.4 � �.�` GF -893 51 • I I \ 1 { I , 0 ,��;_ i • � �� d � �VI' 1 t\ I l f iI `- '''� / r/ k e a' � �� q; - "_ � q V� LF =82 .3 / I I + I � � 92 I I GLF F ==869� 9Gd..d I ,GLF F a==g t 889908..0 3 V GLFF - 88985 .,9 2 I GLF F 2 a �7 r 1 8 / t ' � A I 1 - 1 i4 g V / •' / r11.''89, a. 1 \� ` •V ���'`v - - s - -- 1 I 11 1 / m_ m'�� kCONSTRUCT 1 T / , 8 I 1 5' WIDE BE r- I� / �_ .. g6 - _�96_ S6B :.I •m �u;- [_ `_fbB _ �� V� A- - �n,e 1: f; SAT ELEY =884.4 / j. 1 as. _L ee_ se.;. v'V -1,01 - : - >tc6a -- -. - . \ = _� I I T -884 O - _ - r T -888.0 -�,i F I��� ` - C �� III T 889.0 _ cTs ��/ 1_ %I 8 -884 0 i� B -884.0 0 r i 8 -884.0 MODULAR �. �l :11r I I r I BLOCK RETAINING WALLQ® / \ J L -- _ J L - - - -_ J L_ - -� L- _ -� - -- I - -- - / A BEEHIVE NO. 101 l NGWL =882.5 \ \ 140TH LANE NW RIM =891.0 > / - _ > 100 -YR HWL =891.1 a'.(H):374. 9 4 / 50 0 50 100 d`�(FJa7..9 \ - - - _ _ _ bC k IN FEET F- - - - - -- - r __ _ 1 - F - GENERAL NOTES: I. PRIOR TO IMPORTING OR EXPORTING MATERIAL FROM THE SITE, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER CITY OF ANDOVER STANDARD DRAWING N0. 605. 2. REVEGE TATION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 7 DAYS OF ROUGH GRADING. 3. SEE SHEETS 2 -5 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES, TABULATIONS AND DETAILS. 4. SITE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY HAKANSON ANDERSON. AND 5 S STREETS UNOFF AND B OWINGJACENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE KEPT FREE FROM SEDIMENT CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, 6. CATEGORY 2 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, 12 FEET IN WIDTH, SHALL BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO ALL WETLAND BUFFERS. LEGEND 24 STORM SEWER STRUCTURE NUMBER 7. EXCEPT FOR THE INFILTRATION AREAS, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH Mn /DOT SEED MIX 22 -111 OR APPROVED EQUAL FB'NO FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT AND MULCHED WITH DISC ANCHORED, TYPE 1 MULCH MATERIAL. THE INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL 6E SEEDED WITH Mn /DOT SEED MIX - - - -- 883 - - - -- EXISTING CONTOUR 9 SOIL BORING LOCATION 33 -262. e85 - PROPOSED CONTOUR B-6 FBLO FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT - - EASEMENT LINE PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB GUTTER FB FULL BASEMENT 8. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE 4:1 OR FLATTER. -- G GF GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION - - - - SETBACK LINE PER CITY STANDARD DRAWING N0. 501 9. THIS SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT. LF LOW FLOOR ELEVATION • - FEMA 100 -YEAR FLOOD FRINGE BOUNDARY ;:••.•.:.;.•.•:• •.:.. 10. AFTER CONSTRUCTION, APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT A TEST ON THE INFILTRATION BASIN BY FILLING THE BASIN CT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF • , • _ , , ,.;i;;;;;,;: �;:;:;:;;. PROPOSED RIPRAP PER CITY STANDARD LO LOOKOUT ELEVATION FEMA 500-YEAR YEAR FLOOD FRINGE BOUNDARY ;i:;{;:; {iei;i;ii's;P DRAWING NO. 411 + DENOTES DROPPING GARAGE FLOOR ONE COURSE 6 INCHES WITH WATER AND MONITORING THE TIME NECESSARY TO DRAIN. THE COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT SHALL BE NOTIFIED _ w PROPOSED GATE VALVE DRAINAGE ARROW PRIOR TO THE TEST TO WITNESS THE RESULTS. ONLY LOW PRESSURE TYPE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF PROPOSED HYDRANT O PROPOSED 16.5' CONSTRUCTION BUFFER -- - -- SITE TRIANGLE THE INFILTRATION BASIN. PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE 11. TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN NORTH OF THE PROPERTY IS BASED ON THE MINNESOTA DNA LIDAR DATA. - PROPOSED WATER SERVICE T -866.0 �- DENOTES TOP OF RETAINING WALL ELEVATION REFERENCE NOTES: PROPOSED MAINTENANCE VEHICLE ACCESS - > PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER B -861.0 �- DENOTES GROUND ELEVATION AT 1Q BITUMINOUS TRAIL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF ANDOVER STANDARD DRAWING N0. 7148. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP SHALL BE - PROPOSED A SANITARY N SEWER MANHOLE PROPOSED FILL AREA BASE OF RETAINING WALL CONSTRUCTED AT 141ST AVENUE NW AND SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY OF ANDOVER STANDARD DRAWING NO. 7198. 0 PROPOSED S ® PROPOSED CATCH BASIN a°O°"°- PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION TRUNCATED DOMES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 7038. ® PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE ® WETLAND BUFFER SIGN PER e 0 RETAINING WALL SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO. 611. FINAL WALL DESIGN SHALL BE COMPLETED BY W 2 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE PER CITY - » PROPOSED STORM SEWER 3 STANDARD DRAWING NOS. 604 AND 619 THE BLOCK MANUFACTURER'S ENGINEER. _ > PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION ® INFILTRATION BASIN SIGN PER e p3 AFTER INITIAL GRADING, COMPLETELY SURROUND LOW AREA 1 AND POND 1 WITH SILT FENCE TO PREVENT THE AREAS FROM FILLING WITH -�-T - SILT FENCE PER CITY STANDARD E.O.F. SEDIMENT. y DRAWING N0. 601 1884.4 EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION ® INSTALL CEDAR SPLIT RAIL FENCE ALONG THE TOP OF THE RETAINING WALL. n DATE REVISION I hereby eer rfy that this plan, apecilicolion, or report was fDDMff, 5 , 14 CITY REVIEW 1 prepared y me or vnde, my direct in.., rods and that I TAE - Hokanson Anderson GRADING, DRAINAGE AND 6REET ° 6 I8 14 CITY EVIEW 2 am o duty Licensed Professional Engineer under the las 7 U CITY REVI W 3 at the Slate of Min o. mn s�, Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors % 7 21 14 CITY REVI W 4 EROSION CONTROL PLAN i _ �r TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 CARSON RIDGE OF IM rc itF.E ctasa 763 -427 -5860 FAX 763 - 427 -0520 8 x Date 3/10/14 Lic. No. 43362_ CJJ www.hakanson- anderson.corn CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA sNEE7s 3637.04 i, v,ll , �11ip. DELINEATION OF TREE LINE PROTECTION SHALL IDEALLY BE LOCATED AT THE OUTER i% TREELIKE PERIMETER OF THE DRIPLINE. I ELEVATION VIEW TREE PROTECTION NO SCALE DELINEATION 1 WOODLOT TREE PROTECTION � * * =B' MIN 6' MIN DELINEATION 11 1. STANDARD 48" HIGH SNOW FENCE OR ORANGE SAFETY TREE PROTECTION FENCE. DELINEATION 2. CAUTION RIBBON 4" WIDE MAY BE USED AS PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION OR APPROVED EQUAL. PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION MAY ONLY BE UTILIZED TO DELINEATE TREE SAVE AREAS WHICH ARE REMOTE FROM AREAS OF LAND DISTURBANCE. 3. STEEL POSTS AS NEEDED. 4. DELINEATION OF TREE LINE PROTECTION SHALL EXTEND CONTINUOUSLY THROUGH PROTECTION AREAS, TOTALLY SURROUND INDIVIDUAL SPECIMENS AS NOTED, OR EXTEND ACROSS THE FACE AND THE ENDS SHALL EXTEND 6' BACK FOR INDIVIDUAL TREE LINE PROTECTION. � I / /L i 18" MIN. 4 "T TREE SAVE 11 2" MIN, T AREA 1. SIGN TO BE PLACE 100' O.C. ALONG FENCE THRU WOODED LOT AREA, ON INDIVIDUAL SPECIMENS WHERE NOTED, AND ONE ON EACH TREE LINE AREA TO BE SAVED. SIGNS TO BE AFFIXED TO STEEL POSTS. 2. ALL PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY "KEEP OUT" OR "TREE SAVE AREA" SIGNAGE. 9o-, -893 \� -_. -_' � � � � m♦��:� NOW-2 TYPICAL SIGN No scut TREE PROTECTION DELINEATION 1Q /. 90 -R 3_ - 1� I da a 60 80 $CPLE IN FEET GENERAL NOTES: I. ALL TREES SHOWN SHALL BE PROTECTED. 2. NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORT WILL OCCUR WITHIN THE WOODLAND SIDE OF PROTECTIVE DELINEATION WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. 3. ERECT PROTECTIVE DELINEATION CONTINUOUSLY ALONG DRIP LINE OF SIGNIFICANT TREES CLOSEST TO STREET RIGHTS -OF -WAY. FINAL LOCATION OF DELINEATION SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY ENGINEER IN THE FIELD. SECURE DELINEATION TO METAL POSTS AT A HEIGHT OF 4 FEET, 4. GRADING SHALL COMMENCE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BRIEFED ON PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES. 5. NO TRENCH FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE PERMITTED ON THE WOODLAND SIDE OF PROTECTIVE DELINEATION, 6. IF PRUNING IS NECESSARY, PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON FOR SPECIES. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS OF TREE REPLACEMENT RESULTING FROM DAMAGE TO TREES WITHIN PROTECTED AREAS. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PROTECTIVE DELINEATION AND SIGNS IN GOOD REPAIR THROUGHOUT DURATION OF PROJECT. 9. ALL UTILITIES INSTALLED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE WITHIN STREET RIGHTS -OF -WAY OR UTILITY EASEMENTS. 10. CONTACT THE CITY FORESTER (ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT) AT 755 -5100 TO ARRANGE A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH THE CITY FORESTER /TREE INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBANCE. 11. ALL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, 12. ORANGE POLY SAFETY FENCE OR ORANGE SILT FENCE SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE DRIPLINE OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY FORESTER. REFERENCE NOTES: Q1 ALL OTHER TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PASSIVE. ••••r •_•••" .,,., ,,,,, Pan, speCn,Car,on, or repo" was 6'.EtE9 p,� - -- a , 14 CITY REVIEW 1 prepared, me nr ender my 01 Ee sap,rvinde and Iha+, TAE -- Hakanson Anderson TREE PRESERVATION PLAN i /18/T4 LITY REVIEW 2 pm o dWy Eic ensed Pro l<ssional Engin eer undo. rd Iowa AA SHEET 7 7 14 CITY R yIEW A3 at +ne $taie of µm (Ey R Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 8 %�_ TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 CARSON RIDGE aE IN A. C mm n. 763- 427 -5860 FAX 763- 427 -0520 Date 3 10 14 _ Llc. No. 43362 CJJ www.hokonson- anderson.com 9 CITY Of ANDOVER, MINNESOTA sHEErs CONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT 8'X6' DIP REDUCER, IHV= 878.69 5LF 6' DIP, 6" GATE �T VALVE k BOX AND 1� HYDRANT 'EXISTING RESIDENCE 311E RCP a "l00% 40 0 40 80 IN 64LF (INC. APRON) CS /MH 104 SCALE IN FEET / 0~ 15' RCP O 0.919 48' DIA. (421A) FL= 889.50 APRON 113 (W)INV= 883.51 [SLIMP=891.411 INV 884 50 141LF 15" PCP B " %6" DIP 1EE, I4LF 6" DIP, C8 /MN l03 O 0.95X 6' GATE VALVE k 909 AND 8- GATE QY 48" DIA. (421 A) ° HYDRANT VALVE BOX Q FL= 889.50 ( 837 PVC I 8 "Xe' 01P TEE, / 91LF (W)INV= 883.92 O 0.409 8' -22 1/2' DIP REND AND SAN 89 5 (E)INV =883.82 8' GATE VALVE k BOX / RIM`897.92 _ _ O 0.669 SUMP = 881.82 / INV =886.82. 8' DIP CB 102 '1 WATERMAIN I 7- 2'% 3' 8 {20_ 8 ={ SAN /MH is 11WATERMAIN ' 0IP F1 =90.10 RIM= 94.6.2 RIM 97.4 59L (S)INV- 887.10 _ _ \ ° ` GATE .- . - C8 / M�-N - 10- 6 8' PVC (W)INV 883.02 SUMP= 885.80 VALVE 48' D IA (4 - 2- 1 A ) 129LF (NW)INV= 88820 O 1.7x9 (E)INV= 882.92 k BOX (E)INY =886.70 I fL= 89087 _ 21' R CP ISOLF 1 2 C E INV =881 67 O 1.23% O 1.00% (5)INV- 884.32 -I N)INV =882.07 28L F (INC. APR ON) SUMP-879 67 oC UmTpp 21' RCP O 0.31X + APRON 107 + S I " _ - D DD INV=880.00 8' -22 1/2 DIP BEND 4 1ST AVE NW I i I _ I 22.1/2 �.BND 111 X2.4 fi27PVC / BEND I 1 B" - CB MH 100 47LP- �`` DIP BEND DIP BENDS 8'X6' DIP TEE, O 2.00% 15" RCP 48' DIA. (421 A) O 1.00% 32LF 6' DIP, FL= 890.50 8 "X6' DIP TEE, 6' GATE VALVE k (S)INV =886.80 11 L CONNECT TO EXISTING 47LF 6' I BOX AND HYDRANT (N)INV =886.50 12' DIP, RCP n/. WATERMAIN BY CUTTING IN 6" GATE VALVE k (UMP=B83.00 I " O t.15X Di 8 DIP TEE. USE Di SLEELEE S VES TO CONNECT BOX AND HYDRANT �1 B -11 1/4' / TO EXISTING WATERMAIN. DIP BEND CB 101 / 27' DIA. (401H) i f I V L_ (N)INV_ 8.107 -89 88 '®c e' GATE VALVE X / BOX CONNECT TO // EXISTING WATERMAIN i .�I �mnry .no, .ms plan, speuncmwn, or repoa was 'f TR: 5/1,114 CITY REVIEW Al Prepared by me or und., my avecl supervlslon and Ihot I ' am o d.1 Licensee Prolessianal En near dar the Iv., rTAE E ° 6 IB I4 CITY REVIEW 2 y 9' :i 7/7/14 CITY REVIEW 3 vl the 31o1e o! Min �Date 3 10 14 Lic. No. 43362 140TH LANE NW Hakanson Anderson Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 360 1 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763 - 427 -5860 FAX 763- 427 -0520 www.hakonson- anderson.com IS' RCP O f .009 48" " DI L CB/ D . ( A. (421 A) 1 N)INV .03 STM /MH 112 ( p N)INV_884.43 '48 DIA (4098) 11�\ (W)INV= 884.53 RIM- 8E4.40 SUMP 882.43 (W)INV=880.08 (SE)INV= 880.08 I 23LF (INC. APRON) 18' RCP O 2.17X 80N 110 �STM /MH 109 ( 60' DIA. (4181 RIM = 883. 128LF 60 _ _ _- (E)INY= 860.50 8" PV G APRON 108 (W)INVs880.50 O 0.409 SAN /MH �2 RIM 89 L{1 INV= 880.00 SAN /MH 11 (S)INY 875.96 20LF (INC. APRON) RIM = 893.69 (N)INV= 876.06 18" RCP O -2.50% (SNNV =975.35 (W)INV =877.50 (N)INVs875.45 i L_. �I 13 I I V I W _ I- N W V J III a > av /MH S > Pw 94.90 INV(N) :874.940 INV(E)= 874.89 INV(W' =8.'4.9T_ TO EXISTING CARSON RIDGE GENERAL NOTES: 1. ADDITIONAL STORM SEWER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE ON SHEET 2, REFERENCE NOTES: 01 SEE CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO. 418E FOR WEIR AND ORIFICE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. UTILITY PLAN S "EET 9 CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 9 SHEETS i6i7 nA 1 Oq- i ANID 06 AVTE 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Plat known as Winslow Woods 2 "d Addition, a single- family urban residential development located east of Hanson Boulevard NW and 150`h Lane NW DATE: August 26, 2014 INTRODUCTION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the preliminary plat for Winslow Woods 2 "d Addition. The plat contains 18 -urban lots and 1- outlot as proposed by Tony Emmerich Construction. DISCUSSION Background In March 2014 the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council reviewed the sketch plan for a 52 -acre development known as Winslow Woods. The City Council minutes are attached for your review. The developer will be developing the properties in phases. The four (4) lot plat for Winslow Woods was approved by City Council on July 15, 2014. The eighteen (18) lots known as Winslow Woods 2 "d Addition will be accessed from 1501h Lane NW through the Winslow Hills development. Conformance with Local and Regional Plans and Ordinances 1. The property is located within the 2020 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). 2. The property is zoned Single Family Urban Residential (R -4). Access The 18 lots will be accessed through Winslow Hills by 150`h Lane. Future phases of Winslow Woods will be accessed through Sophie's South by Xeon Street. The future connection of Xeon Street to 150`h Lane will need to be further discussed during the next phases of development. Utilities Trunk sewer and water lines are located within Winslow Hill's developments and will be extended to serve the Winslow Woods 2 "d Addition plat. Lots All the proposed lots meet the minimum lot size requirements for the R -4 zoning district. Minimum lot size requirements are as follows: Lot size: 11,400 square feet Lot width: 80 feet Corner Lot Width: 90 feet Lot depth: 130 feet E Tree Preservation The developer is making every effort to preserve as many existing trees as possible. Numerous trees will be preserved in the rear yards. Tree removal will occur for building pads, drainage areas and street and utility construction. Park and Recreation Commission Recommendation The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the plat at the August 21, 2014 meeting. Cash in lieu of land will be required for the 18- buildable lots. Park dedication for outlot A will be satisfied with the plat known as Winslow Woods 3'a Addition. On February 27, 2014, the Commission discussed a future trail connection at some point along the eastern portion of the plat; the exact location has not been determined. This trail would eventually serve the residential areas to the east; possibly through a tunnel system located beneath the railroad tracks. This discussion will continue during the next phases of development. Coon Creek Watershed District (CCWD) CCWD received the plat. It has been placed on the August 25, 2014 meeting agenda. The developer will need to address the conditions as part of the platting process. Conditions include establishing an escrow and to ensure vegetation will be installed to disturbed areas within two weeks of rough grading. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to hold a public hearing, review the proposed preliminary plat and to make a recommendation to the City Council. Attachments Resolution Location Map March 18, 2014 Approved City Council Meeting Minutes Preliminary Plat Plan Set Sketch of Overall Winslow Woods Development Respectfully sub "tted, Stephanie L. Hanson Cc: Tony Emmerich Construction, 1875 Station Parkway NW, Andover, MN 55304 Corinne Holasek, 1159 Andover Blvd NW, Andover, MN 55304 2 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO XXX A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF`WINSLOW WOODS 2nd ADDITION'FOR PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A. WHEREAS, Tony Emmerich Construction has requested approval of a preliminary plat for Winslow Woods 2nd Addition; and WHEREAS, the Andover Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing on said plat; and WHEREAS, as a result of such public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat to the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the Preliminary Plat of Winslow Woods 2nd Addition with the following conditions: 1. Park dedication and trail fees are required to be paid at the time of issuance of building permits. 2. City of Andover staff comments dated August 8, 2014 shall be satisfactorily addressed prior to any grading of the site. The Andover Engineering Department will determine when all items have been addressed. 3. The developer is required to provide easements outside the platted areas as required by the City. 4. Coon Creek Watershed District comments shall be satisfactorily addressed and the permit has been issued prior to any grading of the site. 5. The applicant shall be responsible for the cost of construction of all improvements proposed as a part of the preliminary plat. 6. Building permits will not be issued until the final plat has been recorded with Anoka County. 7. If necessary, prior to final plat recording at Anoka County, a development agreement acceptable to the City Attorney must be executed by the Developer. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 2014. ATTEST: Michelle Hartner, City Clerk CITY OF ANDOVER Michael R. Gamache, Mayor Winslow Woods 2nd Addition Location Map 15P Lot 15421 151& 1494 1470 L436 ➢ " . LAU "',� ? �� M"` •f . .. .,...... ): tl • 01' ,'� 13290 r GURPLE 8A9'iC m 152A5 LAOS 15240 p 15219 5235'r *1371 ,C� ,15221 At 1546 � 1*3r5?4'113^• b90 r �`< IS232 /" ) 5L t3 13204 `rP qq toe 114 4p . "' 15216 CRVi51 "4 '1424 J•tt 139 G \\ x`0•;_+,15191113 1s186'yy b �\.. .�'� 15195 .n k 119:; 10] z l0s 15190 b, " . :�' 1410 ride va-- / < Sua 'Ba,CL PARKiOfAPLER Ali 103 ,., „r "• lSitr, < ,� •... \� 15167 ''✓ �}i 5179 / ° Svar 4 15291 $ I W0111kWPAKK: LN o \3'��oT P ._ .� 151]0 .+''" �1�/�• �^ 151]1 ,rl }!\ '\ 1339 !` 15145 ,'; 5136 + 15131 y' d LEO] ,' i' 15155 ' �$ M1 y,y3c] l �5.( I \ L5L33 ~'•'"15130 (10 5 tt 15150 • j 1 1SL3A A, 1515.:, '1190 L5147"! f `t' 15139 ,: '� S FB , ,✓' ? `�L35ay 15140 ,r y' yT 13109 16114 ? 15107 15143\. 15110 CA055TOWN O.LVO q0\ ✓,�'�• I �' N'i510i LSlOC • <d 15103 _.. ......,._._._... ..,.,..,,„. _........__, .. ._.... \. N�c'"J 15130 i Y .r'"f''ISI08 -✓ y 1512] i ,.I 15119 a D 15093 15099 ;,.. . ..._...._....__.,._ v 1 vi51L1 `k'"15120 F < d' '•f509e m� Di LSWS e d r 4 13093 p 15122,,,E „ -"`� ,,,.r °-, 15107 f E �t LWB9 E 1W so, i N `k ,.- 15101 k 1s11o1 m. twos ...i a 1W85 o s , lsosa`y < „�.' •... ._1 ,,. 1W90 h # I S LOTS 2 t 15089 y 15103 15069 (yi 15095 15060 I iWtL i 150]] ... ti �^ LW8d �.. r1 19061 LIW90 ' •���` - 15014 IW72 15o]311W10, ._..{ Isom 3 i 1 539! 1503, i! t N Y •11.5500•6]. 3 ] F • 15W07Q 6 LSG2 i LW67 1506� . 1065 ISOM 501 .1591 H. N ISOTHiN ” LN H LN 1507H LN 250TH LN 1507H LN_ ]500 TH 15036 r 15033 15034 115035 15036 i L50371 13032 15031 115030 j inis 11302 °lisola 1zaG'1no 15023 L a i �1SOz6 i n; LWLS i Lwm j 0o 1wz1 t isozz. �. L. _ww� Lw1G' ,! Lm5 s � 3.• L5009 i. IsIIs ;'T''. 14995 �--...t Y LW10 • m, 15005 150061 2ci 15007 ¢ L5000 i 2i I MI 1 -_ T,v ----- ---• T �'} y4 ^"—Y 499] p 1A996 y�' I"'�"�"` one 14993 ° L4994 m° 14995 14990 Laos f 1496 l 1 .„. 149911 L4992 k nr.�, # ...-: ti '-"'•'tt_. u\t 149921"'"" I `; 149]9 1 14980 14981 }149]64 - """"''� `I 14961 i 14977 149]81 44 1496 14961 149Q gIM121! 149]1�13P t 1496 i Ib9Gi ''� ✓ } _ 1 i 149TH LN "149TH LN 249THtniT S✓ _ �� 14954 !1560' 'ISM X14951 __ 1s 1t ji p ® 1635 lGb lip LS]1 f155Si�5a9��cm Y�539Z BrN LN LN l�/ 1 '� 14933 ai38413 /[ t� 148] 1 1455 � 1423 fm� 13853 13]1 134] L159 Disclaimer: Maps and documents made available to the public by the City of Andover are not legally recorded maps or surveys and are not intended to be used as such. The maps and documents are created as part of the Geographic Information System (GIS) that compiles records, information, and data from various city, county, state and federal resources. Copyright © 2013 City of Andover, A// Rights Reserved Printed 08/19/2014 N W e s Regular Andover City Council Afeeting Minutes — March 18, 2014 Page 3 ,Motion by Bukkila, Seconded by Howard, approval of the Consent Agenda as read. Nlotioncaried unanimously. ANOKA COUNTYSHERIFF 'S OFFICE dIONTHLYREPORT Commander Kevin Halweg presented the FebrtrarY Andover N9onthly Sheriffs Report to the City Council. 4— FSKETCII PLAN RE I!I E FI% I PINSL O I P WOODS- PAUL E�1 AIERICH COAISTR UCTIOAT t Carlberg explained the City Council is asked to review a residential sketch plan for a single family urban residential development including all of the outlined properties on the drawing in the packet as proposed by Paul Erunerich Construction. Ntr. Carlberg reviewed the staff report with the Council. Councilmember 13uldita asked if the property all the way to the south is the same property owner. Mr. Carlberg indicated the developer before the ConRCiI has a purchase agreement to purchase what is depicted in black lines around the property on the map. The ghost plat areas are being retained by the property owner at this point. Councilmember Bukkila wondered what planning was clone to extend Leon Street down farther tlrrouglr the ghost plat. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the street plan with the Council. Councilmember Knight thought a Wi itergreen Street connection would look frumy. TAr. Carlberg stated it is up to the Council to direct the developer as to what connections they would like to see with the roads. City Staff reviewed the Street connection with the Council. Mayor Gamache noted the majority of the traffic will need to be directed down \eon Street. He stated one of the three issues brought up is the road connection of Wintergreen Street. Con tic ilmember TrUde indicated she did not want Wintergreen Street connected because it will become a shortcut. Nlayor Gamache indicated lie would prefer theyhave some connection; but it did not need to be directly connected there could he a jog in the road to slow traffic down. Councilmember Bukkila stated she would prefer Wintergreen Street to go through on a more direct angle and to provide another access to Set north. CounClmemberBukkila stated the ultimate routes for this neighborhood are not going to bemade or broken on the Street. N1r. Carlberg stated there is cun�e.nlly a sign on the cul -de -sac indicating it is temporary. Councilmember Bukkila stated the people to the right of the cut -de -sac are going to use `,eon Street to go out and the people to the west of the cut -de -sac are doing to use Yello��� Pine Street ]fthey are meeting resistance, they may go clown that street bat she Regular Andover City Council Afeeting Minutes — March 18, 2014 Paue 4 did not think they were going to gel a flood of residents doing that because the majority of the traffic does not head north in the City, the natural pull is to head in the direction of their destination which is generally going to be south. Councilmernber Tnule felt that once the Count received the Federal Grant for reconstruction of Hanson Boulevard, there will be medians and the County will eliminate left hand turns onto Hanson Boulevard Nlayor Gamache thought some would be eliminated but there will still be some available such as 14S`h Lane. He stated on the drawing they do not have Xeon Street going down to 150`h Lane. %Mr. Carlberg stated staffs comments reRardinR that, were to nv to make that Xeon Street connection to 150'h Lane. However, the developer is only purchasing what is within the. black lines. Mayor Gamache suggested the developer go back to the owner to try to purchase the land just past 150"' Lane in order to construct the road. Mayor Gamache stated the stretch where they have double frontage lots, he would prefer the sketch with ttuee cul -de -sacs instead. He would like to not put any driveway access onto ,Peon Street, and to keep that open. Coll 11--i Imember Trade agreed. Nlr. Carlberg stated the three cul -de -sac sketch is one of the original sketches submitted by the developer and staffs effort generally is to eliminate cul -de -sacs or try to avoid them. Councilmernber Trude stated on the east side of the plan are two sets of railroad tracks and one set becomes a parking lot for Burlington Northern trains so any home on the end of the cul de sac will be up against the tracks, but the cul -de -sac lots seem to be a little deeper and dive more buffer. On the other plan, there was the potential for an entire Nvall of fences in back yards so people are going to live in a narrow area with either the railroad tracks behind them or the busy street behind them with a Nvall of fences so driving in the neighborhood would not look attractive. She stated they need to look at what kind of neighborhoods they are building. Councilmernber Bukkila thought that was a good point. The development needs a buffer from the railroad tracks. She stated they have no buffer at all along the railroad tracks and she is looking at deeper lot depth by the railroad tracks. Councilmernber lunight stated in the next ten years the train traffic is going to increase steadily especially if they start bringing oil in from the north, so he agreed there needed to be a buffer. Mr. Carlberg stated there will be a trail on Xeon Street on the west side and eventually there will be a connection onto the tracks to the south. NMI-. Haas wondered if the rest of the Council is interested in a trail going east, and then under the railroad tracks. CouncilnnennberTrude indicated she would be interested. Nit. Haas stated they will need to work with the developer on where the best place for a crossing would be based on the soil conditions. Councilmember Trude stated the issue with a Wintergreen Street connection is that it brings very little value to the project and she thought it decreased the quality of the neighborhood. She would like staff to look at getting a right turn lane on Crosstown Boulevard for Y61ow Pine Street as a part of this he Cause most of the car; will be turnin « ill ere to come into the devetopment. She thought the Regular Andover City Council tbteeting Afiunutes —March 18, 2014 Page 5 neighborhood would be split up by extending Wintergreen Street. She thought the neighborhood was nice with a street that curves and access to the park with the trail. She stated any time a street is Put in between a row of homes, it separates those people as far as sense of community. She stated by extending the street they will lose a couple of nice lots and she wondered if the benefit of adding the pavement and slicing up the neighborhood was worth it when they do have more connections now than they did in the past. She stated this is corulecting into Winslow Hills so it is very well connected into the community and they are providing more egress for Sophie's South than they have in the past. She thought the connection would devalue the neighborhood and the lots it would cut through would be devalued. She did not think the connection would add much. Mayor Gamache reviewed the possible Wintergreen Street connection. He did not think that a road would be that much of a disturbance. Councilmember Trude disaureed and indicated it would split the conuuunity up in that development. She stated they already have the railroad tracks and a busy street and the only choice lots in the development are on Street A. Councilmember Kr4oht wondered about going straight west with Wintergreen Street. Mr. Carlbem, indicated they would not be able to connect Wintergreen Street to Crosstown Boulevard. Councilmember Bukkila stated in order to have a reasonable access to the park for the kids, if someone is anywhere west of this neighborhood they will not go to this park. If they keep thecut iu the street everyone to the west would have to go clown to Bluebird Street to the park to the south. The only other route would be to get onto I 501 Lane and go east to the park. When talking about value there is a huge value if there is a safe mobile passage on the residential streets for families to get to the nearest park. If they have to go the other way to get to the other park you are devaluing everyone to the west. There was further discussion regarding the park with staff and the Council. Councilmember Howard stated lie is okaywith connecting Wintergreen Street because it is another avenue for public safety and he did not think it hurt the plan and it was always intended to go through. Councilmember Knight stated he could live with Wintergreen Street going through. City Staff reviewed with the City Council street configurations and connections. Councilmember Bukkila stated her concern is not to have blind angles or speed on the curve. where there is pail, access. hti-. Carlbergstated it is important to review this and determine if a connection between the developments is something they want to see. There is currently only one. connection point between Sopbie's South and this development, which is Xeon Street. Otherwise everyone ill Sophie's South has to go north to Crosstown Boulevard by Xe0n Street so there is no conuieclivit}' betyveen the neighborhoods. Counciluiennher Bukkila indicated her preference is for theconneclion but shewnuld like to seehow Regular• Andover City Council Xleeting Minutes — March 18, 2014 Page 6 it lays out. Mr. Dickinson stated that will be a requirement before the developer comes back for a preliminary plat. Councilmember Trude stated she would like to see more energy put into making sure the land is connected then a street, because in the long run the land will be more valuable to the community. Nlavor Gamache asked if everyone would prefer the tlufee cul -de -sacs over the road shown on the proposed sketch. Councilmember Howard wondered if the water utility will be okay for the three cul -de -sacs. Nlr. Dickinson stated that would be a question for the developer's engineer and he thought the water utility should be Looped in that area. COmletlmernber BuW- la stated the cut -de -sacs are not her fast choice but she would concede if they are going to get deeper lots with more bufferinc, along the railroad tracks. \ /Ir. Carlberg stated the minimum depth is 130 feet and he thought the lots shown are around 140-150 feet deep. Vh. Lary Olson, representing the developer, stated they are tookinc, at the three cut -de -sacs atong the tracks to minimize the number of lots that back tip dircctly to the tracks. He stated they are also looking at additional buffering along 111e tracks. Councilmember Howard wondered if the lots in the cul -de -sacs are standard depth lots. Mr. Olson indicated they are deeper. Councilmember Trade asked what Mr. Olson and his design team have seen as issues. Mr. Olson thought the Council had lit on most of the issues. His team has concluded on the Wintergreen Street connection that it is more street to .maintain and chops up the area because of the odd angles. It isolates the lots to the west if Wintergreen Street connects. He explained what type of lots people like to live on and if the cul -de -sacs were to be removed it would take away those lots. Another thing is that by making the Wintergreen Street connection, it will mean another street the kids will need to cross to get to the park. %,layor Gamache asked if the developer is fine with the trail along Street A that runs to the park. Mr. Olson stated they are fine with it. ivlayor Gamache asked if there were no driveway accesses to Xeon Street would the developer push out the boundaries for those lots. Mi.. Olson stated if the Park Commission wanted it for park, it would be fine with them but it really does not make sensebecause it is all wetland. If the lots are extended through, people would need to go out to Xeon Street to get t - to their back yard and some people would not be able to get to their back yard because they would have to cross someone else's yarcl. In Sophie's South there are already ten driveways with access to Xeon Street, he would prefer a buildable lot with access to Xeon Street. Couocihmember LukkIla stated she would not have any interesl in buying the wetland area because it would not be any use to them. The Council reviewed with the developer the areas within the development that are considered v"'- lands. Regular,9nclover• City_ Council Meeting dfinutes — Nlarch 18, 2014 Page 7 Mayor Gamache stated the Council would like to see the next plan to show access to Wintergreen, Street one plan with access and one without. Mayor Gamache wondered if there was unanimous a«reement to not have driveway access onto Leon Street. Councilmember Trude thought it depended on what the Park Commission thought because they are going to look at this again Councilmember Howard stated lie is okay with one lot on there but wondered if it would be possible to look at acquiring some more or putting a trail through there. Mayor Gamache stated the reason he thou alit there should not be any more driveway accesses onto Xeon Street is that eventually Xeon Street will go all the way to Andover Boulevard and with the layout of Hanson Boulevard in the future, Xeon Street will probably get more busier. %Mayor Gamache stated another item the Council would like to see happen is Leon Street going all the way to 150`h Lane. It would benefit the development because 150`' Lane will not end and wait until the nest development comes in. Cott ncilmember Knialit stated they want the three cul -de -sacs sketch. Collncilnlednber Trude slated this witl enable fewer double frontage lots and fewer lots against a fence. %Mr. Cailbera asked if the applicant is willing to do a revised sketch and bring it back for finther discussion. Mayon Gamache thought that miaht be the main issue on the plan. Nlr. Carlbern thought the applicant was leaning towards revising the sketch and brinaina it back for further review. Nor. Carlberg reviewed what has happened with the sketch plan after it went to the Planning Commission. uh. Jim Traver, 1 134 152 °a Lane, stated he is close to the park in Sophie's South and one- of the original sinners of the proposal for additional park land presented to the Plarmina and Zoni nn Commission. Their concern is with the park and the comununity. He stated the park already gets a lot of use and is a nice park with 3 -4 lots unsold in Sophie's South. The park is going to get even more use with 102 lots being developed to the south. He stated they looked at the plans and thought if lot 59 was eliminated, it could be used as an extension of the park in some way. They could also make their own natural trails. He thought i f the cul -de -sac on Street E could be shortened with part: land at the end, it would allow access to Leon Street and the City could have their tunnel underneath the railroad tracks. Mr. Traver stated being in Sophie's South, he would prefer Winternreen Street not be extended because it will not benefit either development. He thought it would cut up the neighborhoods. 'layor Gamache. indicated the next step will be the Park Commission's consideration of this plan and then it will come hack to the Council for further review. i SINGLE FAMILY 80' MIN. WIDE LOT \ �' •` 7F-,Gc JO' MIN. REAR SET3ACN LOT# /rYV \ MINIMUM 110' BUILDABLESIDARAGE $ETBA6G FS I YA �� � \ HOUSE. 10 Fi -� \ \\\ � \ \ \ \ MIN- FROM SETBACK \ \ 1 R W \\ 'tea NOTE'. / DRIVENAY ACCESS LOCATIONS MUST BE \\q AT LEAST 50 FEET FROM ANY INTISECUUV. \ / \ � / / \ �4\ /' \ \ • lb / \ \�� �( \ / 'IN W.INSLOWWO ®D' ,,�I� I _ 2ND ADDITIOr C z 7 ANDOVER, MINNESOTA I III 1 3 8 0 IF 2 w 9 dl z I 150TH LAN I; 2 3 4 1 3 I IN OUTLOT A O \ \ I —T - -- I NW 6 8 I � -�� LOCATION MAP 5�1 dY F II X41 r#�d 4wA' usvr. 3 It ._i •r \ .e \ \ \\ N 1 �_ J/ \\ I � e II I( {� o RECEIVED t J I I < AUG 20 2014 CITY OF ANC ""R I�0 Im SHEET INDEX 1. COVER 2. PRELIMINARY PLAT INDEX 3 -6, PRELIMINARY PLAT 7. PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLANS 8. PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLANS 9. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 10 -11. DETAILS CALI. BEF0FIE YCU m 0 A e Know what's belOW. Call before you dig. N I0 50 11010 200 1. ANOKA COUNTY BENCHMARK NU. 1035 15 A RAILROAD SPIKE IN 1FE N'N FACE OF POYCR POLE NO Iii Oil AT 111E SE QUADRANT OF PRAIRIE ROAD AND 157TH AVENUE N W ELEVATION. 904 43 (NAVD 88) 2. ANDHA COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. 2031 SECOND ORDER BENCHMARK IN COVERT TUBE. 10 F1. N. OF LTY. R0. N0. IB & 20 FT, E. OF CENTERLINE TO LItY NALL DRIVEWAY ENTNANGE. N= ELEVATIO 098.60 (NAVO Be) v � vii m Z n 0. N N Y � W C 10 V�oo =oo V�� W N ` I A: no 0 w °a c a � a a N z O M D 0 a W o0 W N c x 0 W O `w 0 00 U 3¢ O r U) z M z z Vz mD° M LU 0 �Naz LU 0 0 z tn�� OO�a § v qE_ 0.EVI5(0NB L IIN14 III Gly Cpmeols__ 2. B20(te Aer 4lr Enmmmtt 3. __ x 4. a DRAWN BY: -- 110 Y oeslcrveD ev; an ISSUE DATI 6r1/10 fi 1 nelebn w .m tnn: ws oar. spmnullw 5 mr ep prtparttl by me mmWa my 8 rcre s�RAmMOn m mn t , mllr mea :w RArzsu=nal EaAm�l A�en m, Mwz orve sMn or rm,rcurn 3 Name: Brian )- KrYnoAaY, R.E. S,Nturr DNA: 6/4/1A Lkense 0: 25063 1 of 1 g `1 So I -' O LT � 1 \'` \ Qd ✓ N \ Cr�� , ✓ t ✓�� i ,t o ._.- c C ° Ll l\is I iv f,�� ` �i �1 `1 Il Krasnvc xaasc � rlpuuvwi .i •� "`z^- OC ZS.80N • _M pl , nw..>. iC7 / r ', ' 4 (. , 59 56 - 1 - r � •.. Nl �• 3 3016,. r n5a -1 0 _ tlOJ 3z � M, ° 4 �'.�i s.' ^•q" 1 1 _ ' €• YY I 1 ... . r_ a -�YOS` V � 1 I/ I I I I 1/y �- �..� � �p �O�n ✓P � m Z. _I 1 .� 50 y, O Ilm _ v I 10 w, i o' _— _"nso L - -eao zu MN I2JF)00 L - - ---- ' --J i�- - -- 9,0[ i' I » n 3NIdMo R/ t / \4a ! •' ^ O W <I a b 1 r 3 - $ 4 i A vl Ib i I m 7 T- CD I i �C> 0 0 o v o 3 a w m,/ E oI I I a r I I �? .✓ s o U Z n o 0 0 0 c r ¢ o P91, L - - = -- - -- - 7 p 5 i a a - C tv, i / , I _ _. _ I .� _ i L n _ c n o a o _ sC A �I � �/__ t '. 19 n ^� ,T I � 1 / � u ♦ , w r �. G'6Y / '. 37.6 a�fi 80.1 I X90.1 � 80.a� J •i 9901 __ ft3063900I 238.06 '3Z8 64'�i"YfI �$o L -- -, z i yn \ imA� J 6. o z rl \ J � I o 1 3 ° 1 ma3 d rr✓ w� PRELIMINARY PLAT Carlson a 3 = TONY EMMERICH CONSTRUUCTION CTION INC. McCain 1875 Station Parkway NW 6 EN p VWONMENTAL•ENGINEESING• SURVEYING I� ° .�E2 o I I Andover, MN 55304 WINSLOW WOODS 2ND ADDITION Andover, Minnesota 248 Apollo Dr, Suite 100, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Phone: 763- 489 -7900 fax: 763- 489 -7959 e`z�R m i op SEE SHEET 6 SEE SHEET 5 r — / M MI 1 It r IF 1 I i I 1 l n I A I I a l I T I 1 1 r <r tit Et� It -- — — — h .. OUTLOT A - — - -- O �I ' •_ T /- i /. ao ' 7 / 1 , s h`" > PAUL k DMINDA 1 g �- / 1 wl 6 , / / �\ ,� 5g /�� / IIw /. e' 1 11V J .ate °g asTAD / / � � � "Pu� r � �� ♦ � gyp. sD.i� / //A I I i, � � I �I� l ` _ �I A w It eE�Rw� 1 I z.a J wci2Et r 1 ggAA e l G/ + f I 1 L. _ J �i 3"11.0 1 l - - -- T _.. J JEiTEkY At ANN,,) 30 30 -l' r J+I ODROON �% r� a \ •, \ _ ___ _,_ J./� 2� � A� >�� �� i II: I 4032 L-J ra\ Q l -_� loc9' --lm x Ip .� ='.i aan. wn. 1 (Z: 1 (r-- `Im -�uws °ex. s � 0 „ 1 m .. i i aj O u I I 3 J LOUT$ Y ro STFJNEF 1 T I I r w` I I 1 I I I ` 1 11i ' f1.5Npt J i III l m I� v N 1 /i it 10 LEGEND DEC SHEET 31, Storings are eased on the North line or WROT A, WNSUIW WOODS, eh o to aesamed to bear N8878 "33,w. Denoes Exls<mg Ma ale - + - Denetes Undergraand Gas q Denetes Erieting Po+er Pale - '^ - Denotes Dnderg.ad PbeF D N, - •- Denalee Existing Fence, de noted - • - Denetes Uoder,.nr TNephone - -- Denote, Existing We Uand • Denotes Found lien Monument -- - Denote, Existing Sanitary Sewer O De ale, Set Vwr Monument marked rith R.L.S. 40361 0 Zs So Ilp -"- Denotes ESlsting S[wm Sewer V Denetes Existing Hydrant - - - -I- Denetes E,rfining Wafermain PC Denotes Existing Cate Von, (IN FEET) a om N N Z N n L ¢ g v 611111111111111111 n z _1 w c M w =+ W c3 U W O O .+ m V 2 • C qT N `V ° � o S W p C Q O N z O d � Q Q u Z� � N c z G� Ov ►+ O ao c W a O J Z H 3 V Szz HZ m° WOYUN iu i u o OEn c ZN< F- U o REVISIONS J. CNV COm'Ren6 Ins"" z. ag cammmu eabrw _ 3. aPAM'Nli. OFSIGNfn BY: iRA RB IssuE ONiF. Oslo, /N 1 nereav refry Nat In. ­r,. akn m .pan n wes argwM m WNer aY e or my SUaervl4an aM Ina( 1 mn a only WenSN .. Sr-1,1d- MS to- of Me Sutt of Mlnnewrd Name. Thomas R 8.11^ Ls 519n I-,,. Dale: OlgO J4_U,Fn3e 2: 4035) 0 11 I s5'aJ 31 O —,m m 1 1 I I s gs. XA m $ L _.,___ --tm ° SEE SHEET 6 ��" i \ I , I ' t r \ j 1 , 1 l 1 _ / t i i , / c t / + r — \ \ 1 i l m Ftlr l 111 (n \ i 1307.75 1° 11, is tji3 i olNal Po I _U 9 1 � �In \Np V pA• �h , IZA +� i A % 0�8 'z 9 C _ — i ZO nM1� 1 A lAv e� ms �� i 1 i N 1 ..... .- ..._..i._._.._ .. . _ - h, E,— 'VI\ G h W FAMILY FARM PARTNERSHIP`µ ^''T'—Y - -� — l —�' _ o �x d; u, _ ' ° €ds �� m ` I Isl ^I ^I" PRELIMINARY PLAT Carlson za3a£ 3 TONY EMMERICH C • CONSTRUCTION INC. McCain I° fU���V� � tl 'E u F '^• aw 1875 Station Parkway NW Andover, MN 55304 ENVIRONMENTAL• ENGINEERING• SURVEYING =_ WINSLOW WOODS 2ND ADDITION 248 Apollo Dr, Suite 100, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 N I� Ir i;ar aII I I Andover, Minnesota Phone: 763- 489 -7900 Fax: 763- 489 -7959 � (lII I J AiV \ mm VIZ /i 32 Qd o • c I, � i � 4. O / � ! / ��i �\E »�.�r2 \�S ..°'> y�t�. A X1. ry \ . 0 , i / o \ \ � � /''% / V `ti's // y� /• ' � � � � _ / Igo Iry , i y —1 Pa \ Ns y'r \\ r fitly ' /• /' � �. Y -i � L`t�wvw P � �:') , se r \y a I / X* L z \ t � I r f SEE SHEET 5 e -- Carlson PRELIMINARY PLAT TONY EMMERICH )McCain CONSTRUCTION INC. o 1875 Station Parkway NW ENVIRONMENTAL •ENGINEERING • SURVEYING Andover, MN 55304 WINSLOW WOODS 2ND ADDITION 248 Apollo Dr, State 100, Lino takes, MN 55014 r H to r Andover, Minnesota Phone: 763- 489 -7900 Fax: 763- 489 -7959 i / I /jf \ \ \ Ay 9, 5 I IYEI I IIII <d '7 I IIII 3�. IIII o f 0 no 6 I �ili = Iq , IIII ' ,d EX8 EA 074 35 SW (FIELD -1VE i '—_ �iCOANNEs Toi0N 8 I IS ] I (�- I is sl`i ��1�' \•, I 1'e ( 4343 9) CONNECT i0 -fl - EX — ) . -_ 10• %8' REDUCER qii.. SALVAGE EXIST HYDR NT SUPPLY TO PUBLIC WOf 2 1 1 1 I 1 1 ' \ OUTLOT A POND 400 t � � I. �LRSOA 6 Y \ e ` \ rts \ as ADD `\ (SEE OETAR) / I` REMOV£`EXISTNG FENCE (TYP.) t 7 T 8 O �33 I O I pEbIGN . wAw (Aan] [3 *1 ue_C men cM. en r t^E.1 t lmn.l o -cu p k(1 t41 LOMB umn k111 vrwl IV•] t 11p Inrm P +1 M•M twq Rm Ft 6Ma M as wz 4! on OA1 pu O,y II' Of] C c 53 ze ;oi Im: Xn u] s] vwe: E+s.e i Am Iv ON 10 f � i OW: +n9 ]J) 151 ew+l ]Of.N 9y.9} RE 902.86 }� -- — rcS am K 815.13 W om au . IE 889.00 N as +.w 150TH LANE NW Iw ey.n eaam e.aC 1 PVC SAN N) )'W m XX - - o.le ole n Se Py a —_L "N 'n —. �__—.—._ ]5' eeG4 TT AFB w uM i I 3 I Q 5 u \ \ 4 \ \ I 10FALA\' nREA 11UF11.IIT 4RYF41L pEbIGN 1.1.11We4AIX1 wAw (Aan] <eax ml *1 ue_C men cM. en r t^E.1 t lmn.l o -cu p k(1 t41 LOMB umn k111 vrwl IV•] t 11p Inrm P +1 M•M twq Rm Ft 6Ma M as wz 4! on OA1 pu O,y II' Of] u, c 53 ze a Im: Xn u] s] vwe: E+s.e +ooe} Am wx ON 1} 1+ AW 11 OW: +n9 ]J) 151 ew+l ]Of.N 9y.9} +,y al rcS am AN om au . sn as +.w >.w Iw ey.n eaam wzro fel9 m XX - - o.le ole n Se Py a .': "N 'n n Aw.w eR+.M Inm w >d )m Ix ox oy on n EM Ix A.w z.w Xw xa wo-w wf.a WN.le Aw b) WI 01) on Os) eqi n+1 Il .Ib !lf tl Oapt f0F }J) SSn g5fl W.fl gtlb Sfl wl EaswoA oy ow v as ].w le aJ¢: saf ]_'S ue vee.+l euw own] cnu b�\ b\ b\ \ / II E , i.F.G .NP EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE NISDRU WT9DE DRDP -- u LINE -- -- A Y bl s CONCRETE it po of SANITARY SEWER - - --- RE 901.08 _ . IF 875A9 E IF 875.09 W __ - -- — �I 7._._. Iltl �7nnnnn7 a �yL4/LlLlL� SINGLE FAAMY 80' mw. WME EDT BLOCK / XI' MIN, REAR SETBACK % LOT d SIDE YARD SETBACKS AIWUM 110' BUKDABIE GARAGE: 6 FT. BLDG PAD HOUSE: 10 FT. 35' MIN. FRONT SETBACK R/W NOTE. DRIVEWAY ACCESS LOCATIONS MUST BE AT LEAST 60 FEET FROM ANY INTERSECTION. \\ �. co \ \\ \ A MJ NTUR£ POND 300 HE IE WL -OE -SAC j (EE 300 AIL) . PLAN i.F.G .NP EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE -- -- — LINE -- -- %SETBAG CURB - -- -- BITUMINOUS CONCRETE it po SANITARY SEWER - - --- - •�-- MNNTENANG(TLiFSGBB xca �` `♦ � �� �I - -� --� FENCE - -• —•- OVERHEAD ELECTRIC e. - i LIGHT PME > \ y\ . ELECTRIC BOx 08' rree,� Lpl \ TELEMSON BOX ENO If 883,85 N `m \ b \ I D IE 876.43 12• E . E 676.33 FWD 300 IE 87581 8? SW >\ \ \ \ I N II fES xcA 12: PVC SAN SWR _ _ MJ NTUR£ POND 300 HE IE WL -OE -SAC j . PLAN i.F.G .NP EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE -- -- — LINE -- -- %SETBAG CURB - -- -- BITUMINOUS CONCRETE it L ) SANITARY SEWER - - --- - •�-- MNNTENANG(TLiFSGBB �S10RM SEVER �--«�- WE ND - -� --� FENCE - -• —•- OVERHEAD ELECTRIC e. - i LIGHT PME > . ELECTRIC BOx TELEPHONE BOX rree,� Lpl TELEMSON BOX '\ POWER POLE `m RETAINING WALL _... . .\ J E(PLUG) •.... \ \ \\ ( \ IPI `\ W \.. 0 25 50 luo FUTURE SERER k WATER EXTENTON � 1N FEET ) I. ANOHA CWNTY BENCHMARK N0, 2035 IS A RMMAD SPIKE IN THE NW FACE OF POWER PO.E 140. 111017 AT THE SE CUADRAHT OF PRAIRIE ROAD AND 157TH AVENUE N.W- ELEVATION: 904.43 (NAM 8) 2, ANOKA COUNTY BENCHMARK NO 2031 SECOND UNDER BENCHMARK IN COVEREC TUBE, 70 R. N. OF CTY. M. NO. IB d 20 FT E. OF CENTERLINE TO CITY HALL DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE. ELEVATION: 898.50 (NAND 88) CALL BEFORE YOU DIG Know whars below. Call before you dig. 1. Q NA /ARY LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED NWL 894.5y _ PROPERTY LINE - - OUTLET = 894.5 �\ .`\ \ `_ - WETAND FILL (7IIll� ssF EASEMENT LINE --- -- - ----- /' a `� TOO YR HWL n 89� .6 // ,� �' \� m� 1.` ti NOTE: WETLAND FFPUCEMENt CRE91g i0 BE PuFp1A5ED NRB iJNE _ _ _ — — / /Y� /• \q\ / / /�" \�\ �` \`` / 1 �`� \``-` IN UEU OF ONSIIF REPIftEMEHT. BITUMINOUS C__ —_� / �! '" '': �\\ ~\ —` fl SANITARY SEWRC !(PR M LY AP�ROVE¢�� \ ` °r i - --r - ``•;:,;.... \ \ STORM SEWER—>r-- / POND \jai 1. �`. ` : :.?,� - \ \ WATER uAre - - - - -I— aortcL: ��i i YR HWILBa 998,2 :a� 9'�, ``. \ // ST �M O �E . Vy \ a_::: \r "// / / e \� \i .t, \\ \\ UTI�T /� // WTUTCONTROLSTRUCnmE EWj�OND DATA - -- \ �;- 1 IF�OR. XP NDED POND) / ��. a •a '� :;. \ \ / M uaANT v� 1 / III 892.5" �/ ` �,'- \ J • ` . \ \ \ \ -aoo- f TELEVISION RD% - .. H<y >FUrNONE eo% ,\• 2Q• MAINTENANCE I / l • : �• '.'�.' m \ \ RETUNING WALL t VEHICLE ACCESS / / ( -..1 • ' \ \ \ \ � — FEN« — ,�\� (1 1 MAX SLOPEl / ii BBZ ` \'., \ \ -- �' w' CONTOUR - -- Y CONTOUR \,> \ yyyl� ( l( i 8 `. \'•, TEMA FLOOD PLHtN ---..- ° NEILANO LINE —� \,\ / i I _ .:r,�"- '.• / \ \ m, SPOT ELEVATION ,t EMERGENCY OVERFLOW *0 40 ' / / 6/ /// \ \ \ WETLAND 300 \. — -- — �- SPOT ELEVATION FOR ooO.D / 8 5 I 1, � �., SWALLEES BELOW 2x GRAD[ mC7 h ! a$O) / / \. \ NWL = 891.5 \ \ TO BLUE TOPPED) \ OUTLET = 891.5 SLLT FENCE '�l� l fi C l�9 apq `Q i 7 \• r.- \ TOD YR HWL = 891.s -�'. 1 SUSORA)X CORRECTION \\ \ \. FILL AREAS [�] 16.5' OFFER \\ �.,g \`; WETLAND FILL tJ m B•- m \ % I .3 :. \ ' �.- acx—_` �fl II�III FUTURE ROAD CROSSING. l•' - <d I. is- - \, b� �t� os \ \ \' MAINTAIN 96.0 E.O.F. el I 1 1 _ 94.J — ( /� vJ W • �� z_ _� 5..; - ®,� A I I l4 p I3 3, � _ — — - - — — alt N �' � • l � r" � I r -'�--� ..: _ '- ��` -v i �I,I ,...w' 1IlIIQ I l V) i � OVE 20 MAINTENANCE � I Z OC DO VEHICLE ACCESS 'I (10:1 MAX SLOPE) JIn 1 — -\ — c `t� I � � �.. {J mm �, ' 1 'i��: / ✓n �� • v • • \ tea. w �'»` d�� \. ,ean e � I 14 0.' I o 2 Z ._, mm JicT '( T I EASEMENT' '• I a I 1 � ,III Y� \ 1� F�� �.� } � ,. L� — —��, �.�: / /. ?4 a.,� \� �V� a,T_I• I ll I �� Q { I" \ NI _ N W Is- a. I V - WETLAND I I a,, �. \ tai 1 1111 { �••A ��i l�l' -2 � I -I � �� - ' � � .. � � ••� � , � `'.� y`1. d11ll�1 1. 1 i 31 r 1 1 I I 1 II I I JI� 4�G ro OIW6 — �laou�" I. a I Illl ,rs i �Q-.I __�- -' {I , a_150TH _.-`a- ms 'l 'DD,u00 "•,- .:.�`, gz• .- �.... -.- � ',\ I IIjII�.. t GVLL m \ - vµvo 02.0 L. B JJ6 ✓,: : L ..-. \ �1 I `'� I ' \ CONUC110N -w- -+�- ;025 ICii AGCE 9 , . • • • • e i I l I rT`� - \. ENTRANCE Os s.a �- 0:'03.0 os�ott A _ 1 - V s 90 POND 300 Iox,Iz i 1 }11. NWL ~>�891.9 } °I hl• 100 YR HWL \= 892.3 i'� LI�I / �� �. � _ I •' _ V ` CU OE -SdC I l i � a!, A 1 � 1�I % y r j o a t� sos s c ft ft (a9� o) 11 �a� �I 4 I lill. ull I� Is�._ L� ' ° �, E �. �, -V x05.5 G '(a97.5) - N; ,.s • � TEMPORARY SWALE {/ W LE �, v/ , A 905. 4 / (8980) 1 1 "I A •/ 1 / 4 1 /`0�° 1 aeao) I° .v NDI G FOR I 4', G R , ( 1 1,` �5 :. 6 ; I I ..r7�� ,' ,.SSE �"- .�� � � '. FU RE RE PO � 5','r __` _ .I osO -.'a V ,\ I • \j, 1 2� ,�;o� I l I I� W1NSlOY�ADD1TtONS _ I II I III 1 1 4- - i I 2� A 1 I I l'.(Di ` �. v _ l i w , ...i ` �I: -sF- •t l ( Dab a2.a I Y �'a.. N1 !. .. �. 100 YR H 901.2 I R LI1 I �'�, s - �11u� •��.. A J j• J 1 -r! \V0{tANGF SILT FEN \ 1 - _ - _ PROPOSED PONDING EAS 1 J �RDED AT Tl E OF ANALLAT RTO DE ' �•' \ l 1 M EGORD'Am III !I I ,Ii e �ei•'YSe�I�ll 6 V ti 0 Olt 0 rn N �Z I _ p f OO O• r Y ,Ee N11 J h r ,Z LV `� 2 O O Y O, CA um FJ L Z 'nOD W i o m Q o 0 Q 00 CL r^W Z V O a z Z L~y �a o C J 4 �a 2 G z N a 0 U) �v > 0 e� 3a za o r �+ z J M u 3 2 z HZ AM W0Y�^ f L v W z y Yn 0Z Q r- o REMIGN5 _ ,. rTZVU yr utr vmmms 2. wati9 Pe/ CIN Comme�[a 4. s. DnAwn ar —— Tio OFSfGrvFO flT; BJR ,Vi PATE 614114 onNmt amrr mac wa PTe sown�Ilaa .won waa Prep ..3 ev r erM Pa N , e ,I I am a ew. flcen,N P'aksslonal Ea91 unEr Nye laws at the s:aa M nlmasob rvamc- Bdan 3 %rYSmR�k P E_ SlgnaNre � /!. �ate'61zpa ucenu W; 25063 8 of 11 a o m Z N T h Z C Cm £CD N y t1 • Yq PO 2 J h N d0x Vzoo W O um . .h z m ^ W N o `` �` i `V O 0 h 2 O > O N W p C Q O Z O Z J O a o a 0 00 ~ Z d Q N � > y g O W O w` W o a° Q a 3 W O W .J Z M 3 zz U3 z oC Z t wOY� w �F.aAz $Ucf WD�v Z v;? - -1f •�-a -1f __ r-- �r-- -�r--- 1 I t LOCATION MAPS S — // -- �` •� `\ \\ 2 I nw) I 1 I n.z> II t,w l! D81 II 9 11 f / /n O 5 OU TLOT A r ban O €!hm 2 tiOlo t•� � o m � uv i � rc , W o K vw Jm P7 26 II 11 �ti % \ /! // / \ �. I I € f i Z °- \ \ oa4) t 036> II ) t \ ! 1521 COURT NW A m (s3) j/f // � (� nY6Z) I { "� i �F' i o 0 0 I'i z o� a m v C w , \v�` Z O EEI It a LOT KEY w DO BLOCK P Q // \ /\ ✓/f / �4 / \ // 22 \� ^2� \ \\/ ,/ (sn /f �`1r�J // I un I �0 II ( „e / Q (41 II 1 11 i 9> / \\ ^',, I I Q ,+ LOT I / ORADIN LA C PLAN REFERENCE P 13 \ 21 i^ � ,`� /� �,�) II 9 \�� 152ND AVENUE NW r 14 15 I 11 11 -, \ 15` `� il; w 17 \VA 4{ ) I � 1 18 II (177 11 1 \VA ���� I O 1 _ 1 II II O66i1 \\ / P' Of z I II II vv i �' I I o - o II II I "RECEIVED �I; 1 x - -- r - -, r - - - -r r Z If 13 I 14 11 Da) - I I I I 0 I I 9 Fml // UL o 2014 WOODS gip, �' v�� - - -��- -JIB �� ILET�44 C7G C'v�P (IIIIIVI. ��Il/i`� \Y \ \,\ - - - m - -� 151ST COURT NW 3 � ' 1N OF ANDOVER ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 27 zF4 \ �,6) 11 2; vv I I SHEET INDEX I 1. COVER r / � 2. PRELIMINARY PLAT INDEX 3 -6, PRELIMINARY PLAT =Z Z r \ 7. PRELIMINARY SITE & U UTILITY PLANS �� vvv B. GRADING INDEX. � O l Il O,o /// 1 + v v I 9 -12. PRELIMINARY GRADING & O a EROSION CONTROL PLANS EW c __ -_— `\ \ I 13. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN W Uj Z v 14 -15. DETAILS �Z VJ -gyp O v 3 2 9 Z 1 II - -- -� t -� - -_ -" -j \ \ II II P1..ETV2II9S/1104N115 r0 ppummenh \. ` DMI NBY: BUK 150TH LANE NW T\ ' I D 5o t�JOD isSUENlnm: 6IK is SUE MIE: 614114 II l I I t (3 1 I ` \, I n�M =wry m4, CnI(elan evu�6saw, - 3 4 i / 1 nop {I czzl II ,m Ij Owl li O 11 Ooa ,ml III nwl II I _ erai suve,du °a�N4�641Ia N, II ` Yme arm a eml 1 -__ BENCHMARK Dn �> eslcoalENN vcame J CALL B I I4. :mme snem(mm�e,4m I--- �L-- -,� 60PEY W DIG 1. ANOKA COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. 2035 Name. B,lan 1. %rynPflak P E j V IS A RAILROAD $PIKE IN THE NW FACE E QUADRANT E I OF PRAIRIE ROAD AND IS 519raWre: %I 157M AVENUE N.W. Date: 6)4)19 Ul.e . t! 25063 EEVAIION: 904.43 (NAVD BB) 21 ANOKA COUNTY BENCHMARK u0. 2031 SECOND ORDER BENCHMARK IN COVERED Pow kat's below. TUBE. FT E oP CENhnuNC ro cITY ], �' ”) (� 4 CaII bBIOIQ you III HALL DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE oP/ 9 EI-EVATON. 599 so (NAND Be> 15 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Prelim[ a single - family urban residential 161" Avenue NW DATE: August 26, 2014 iary Plat known as White Pine Wilderness 2 "d Addition, development located north of 161 s` Avenue NW at 1341 INTRODUCTION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the preliminary plat for White Pine Wilderness 2 "d Addition. The plat contains 16 -urban lots and 1- outlot as proposed by L & K Emmerich LLC. DISCUSSION The Andover Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary plat. Staff comments have been submitted to the developer. The developer has made revisions according to staff comments and will continue to work with city staff to satisfy all continents. Conformance with Local and Regional Plans and Ordinances 1. The property is located within the 2020 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). 2. The property is zoned Single Family Urban Residential (R -4). This parcel is allowed to develop into urban lots at a density of 1.75 — 3.6 single family homes per acre. The proposed density for the 2 "a Addition (16 platted lots) is 1.62 units per acre. However, when outlot A is developed, the overall density increases to 1.90 units per acre. Access The 16 lots will be accessed by the extension of 161 st Lane NW to the east. A future phase of White Pine Wilderness will be accessed by extending the Zilla Street NW, as shown on the attached preliminary plat. Utilities Trunk sewer and water lines are located within White Pine Wilderness development and will be extended to serve the 2 "d Addition. The water main will also be extended within the future right -of -way to the northern boundary of the plat, connecting with the drainage and utility easement through the North Woods Preserves open space. The extension of the water main will serve future development to the north. As part of the 2 "d Addition, a drainage and utility easement to the northern boundary will be required for the installation of the water main. Lots All the proposed lots meet the minimum lot size requirements for the R -4 zoning district. Minimum lot size requirements are as follows: Lot size: 11,400 square feet Lot width: 80 feet Corner Lot Width: 90 feet Lot depth: 130 feet Floodplain and Wetlands There is a significant amount of wetlands and floodplain as part of this plat. The wetlands have been delineated and the report is being reviewed by the necessary agencies. Plat approval will be subject to the developer obtaining required permits from all necessary agencies. Tree Removal The existing property is densely vegetated. However, the majority of the trees will need to be cleared for grading/drainage areas, building pads and for the construction of streets and utilities. Trail System Currently there is an existing temporary trail easement to access the North Woods Preserve Open Space. As part of the plat 2 permanent ten (10) foot trail easements will be in place to access the open space; one on the south part of the plat and one on the north part. Park and Recreation Commission Recommendation The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the plat at the March 6, 2014 meeting. Meeting minutes are attached for your review. Cash in lieu of land will be required for the 16- buildable lots. Park dedication for outlot A will be determined when it is platted in the future. Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization ( LRRWMO) LRRWMO has received the plat. At the August 22, 2014 watershed meeting, the board approved the LRRWMO permit. Coordination with other Agencies The developer is responsible to obtain necessary permits from agencies that may have interest in the site. Initial contact shall be made with the City Engineering department regarding this item. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to hold a public hearing, review the proposed preliminary plat and to make a recommendation to the City Council. Attachments Resolution Location Map March 6, 2014 Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes Preliminary Plat Plan Set Respectfully submitted, Stephanie L. Hanson Cc: L& K Emmerich LLC, 1341 161 s` Avenue NW, Andover, MN 55304 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO XXX A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "WHITE PINE WILDERNESS 2 "d ADDITION" FOR PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A. WHEREAS, L & K Emmerich LLC has requested approval of a preliminary plat for White Pine Wilderness 2 "d Addition; and WHEREAS, the Andover Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing on said plat; and WHEREAS, as a result of such public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat to the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the Preliminary Plat of White Pine Wilderness 2nd Addition with the following conditions: 1. Park dedication and trail fees for the 16 -lots are required to be paid at the time of issuance of building permits. 2. City of Andover staff comments dated August 12, 2014 shall be satisfactorily addressed prior to any grading of the site. The Andover Engineering Department will determine when all items have been addressed. 3. Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization comments shall be satisfactorily addressed and the permit has been issued prior to any grading of the site. 4. The developer shall provide an easement for the water main connection to the northern plat line as part of White Pine Wilderness 2 "d Addition. The City will fund the water main cost which will be reimbursed by the developer, at the original project cost with no compounded interest, at the time outlot A is developed. The City will enter into agreement with the developer that if the alignment of the water main changes during the platting of outlot A, the City will pay project costs related to relocating the water main pipe. 5. The developer shall grant 2 — ten (10) foot trail easements to access North Woods Preserves Open Space; one trail will be provided as part of the 2nd Addition, located between lots 4 & 5, Block 2. Another trail easement on the northern end of the development will be required at the time outlot A is developed. 6. Building permits will not be issued until the final plat has been recorded with Anoka County. 7. If necessary, prior to final plat recording at Anoka County, a development agreement acceptable to the City Attorney must be executed by the Developer. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 2014. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Michelle Hartner, City Clerk Michael R. Gamache, Mayor EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: That part of the South 16.50 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, and that part of the Southeast Quarter of said Northwest Quarter, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence South 88 degrees 42 minutes 03 seconds East assumed bearing along the South line of said Northwest Quarter a distance of 1713.58 feet; thence North 07 degrees 16 minutes 31 seconds East a distance of 60.33 feet the to North line of the ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 201 also the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 07 degrees 16 minutes 31 seconds East a distance of 161.83 feet; thence North 33 degrees 18 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 104.56 feet; thence South 89 degrees 24 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 45.69 feet; thence North 31 degrees 22 minutes 11 seconds West a distance of 88.56 feet; thence easterly 53.39 feet along a non - tangential curve concave to the North having a radius of 60.00 feet, a central angle of 50 degrees 59 minutes 12 seconds, and a chord which bears South 88 degrees 36 minutes 06 seconds East; thence South 80 degrees 15 minutes 02 seconds East not tangent to last described curve a distance of 169.64 feet; thence North 74 degrees 02 minutes 53 seconds East a distance of 55.02 feet; thence North 58 degrees 55 minutes 41 seconds East a distance of 86.80 feet; thence North 09 degrees 32 minutes 38 seconds East a distance of 33.39 feet; thence North 24 degrees 52 minutes 57 seconds West a distance of 169.27 feet; thence North 01 degrees 19 minutes 49 seconds East a distance of 732.79 feet, to the North line of the South 16.50 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 14; thence North 88 degrees 39 minutes 50 seconds West along said North line a distance of 185.15 feet to the Northeast corner of OUTLOT A, WHITE PINE WILDERNESS; thence South 03 degrees 31 minutes 18 seconds East along the East line of said OUTLOT A a distance of 601.63 feet; thence continuing along said East line southwesterly 348.45 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 300.22 feet and a central angle of 66 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds; thence continuing along said East line, South 62 degrees 58 minutes 42 seconds West, tangent to last said curve a distance of 50.00 feet; thence continuing along said East line southwesterly 233.03 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 213.43 feet and a central angle of 62 degrees 33 minutes 27 seconds; thence continuing along said East line South 00 degrees 25 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 171.80 feet to the North line of said ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 20; thence South 88 degrees 42 minutes 03 seconds East along said North line a distance of 305.05 feet to the point of beginning. AND Outlot A, WHITE PINE WILDERNESS, according to said plat on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota. rMl --0 lj�x 161STAVE 1407 D w 2 Q H z a x White Pine Wildemess 2nd Addition Location Map 1483 16367 1"SO �m11432 1438 1421 1336 Low ¢5 1473 149) 1461 114 ... 14D " ~1417 1403 1495 16387 19321 ,, 1107 + ' i ` t , ! ` 1155 1127 1103 1079 161STAVE ti 161STAVE 1179 "` • = -_i i •, p........ .M W 1493 1a566 [ i la{3: iris _ L17A Y1C1fO1LOO 1078 IW35 {,,. 1W34 1495`w� V 10L5 , y 'r 16127 1 I �� ..° laaz iwx�yt Im35 i i M21 ti ;'1WZS✓) w j.,_..._,j ]" # Im LW23 ? 1� i - ..- .,......, 1w1O �.r. c] f 1gp15 1451 1657((�n - ,_.....,....1 1374 y $U. J� a — ,.�.2b0iN AVE 1 15999, i 13996 m ... -r �, L59 {9 Y I 1� 2.....,y'�f^ 1506 39tf� v 1392]` i 'r-• 1139tGf21597f \ n � 13f77•a 15276` IW7j S_ �W �.�"`^.� i139LG,� 159Rfi1594 7 � Y1�� �, 13959 iA. 1595G� Y i 59y1 ._.i .•�w 139351g Y1 )1%'9!1"50 15947' 1336 Low ¢5 1473 149) 1461 114 ... 14D " ~1417 1403 1495 16387 19321 ,, 1107 + ' i ` t , ! ` 1155 1127 1103 1079 (._ ti ul]7 1053 Zy1C173 1179 "` • = -_i i •, _e_.. ltlti _ 161 ST LN L17A Y1C1fO1LOO 1078 1032 'r 16127 1 t LU55 1 Snx Inlf � 1615rAVE 161STAVE 161STAVE 16093 ' IWSZ p .....,..., -5 ,....... I ..._. N 10050 _.; 1110 1131 Disclaimer: Maps and documents made available to the public by the City of Andover are not legally recorded maps or surveys and are not intended to be used as such. The maps and documents are created as part of the Geographic Information System (GIS) that compiles records, information, and data from various city, county, state and federal resources. Copyright © 2013 City of Andover, All Rights Reserved Printed 08/19/2014 fir, Regular Andover Park & Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes —March 6, 2014 Page 2 \ Sunshine Park on Ids 1 -4 on Friday, May 16, 2014, from 3 p.m. to 10 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0- ys, 1- absent (Marinello) vote. CONSIDER APPLICATIO FOR SCHED ULED USE OF RECREATIONAL FACILITIES /ANDOVER FPW DEPARTMENT FOR A SAFETY CAMP Mr. Haas explained that the Park and ecreation Commission is requested to consider the Application for Scheduled Use of Recrea 'anal Facilities from the Andover Fire Department to use Purple Park. Commissioner Stenzel questioned how the group oizld recruit children to participate and advertise for the event. Mr. Haas stated that he was uncertain but suggested the puNic can contact the Andover Fire Department. Motion by Lewnau, seconded by Miskowiec, to recommend appro 1 of the application for Scheduled Use of Recreational Facilities from the Andover Fire Nartment for Tuesday, June 17, and Wednesday, June 18, to hold the annual Safety Np at Purple Park from 7 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1 -absen Marinello) vote. --� CONSIDER WHITE PINE WILDERNESS 2 "rD ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT Mr. Haas explained that this item is in regard to determining the park dedication requirements for the preliminary plat of White Pine Wilderness 2 °d Addition, He identified the parcel of land and the nearby open space areas that the City has purchased. He identified the first phase of White Pines Wilderness I" Addition and noted that this second addition would include sewer and water utilities as well. He stated that the Commission had previously discussed accepting park dedication in the form of land for this area. He displayed the proposed Preliminary Plat submit by the developer and noted that this plat is differently configured than the plans reviewed in 2006. He stated that the Commission would need to determine whether they would like to accept park dedication in the form of land or cash or a combination of both. He provided additional information regarding the City owned open space areas including their access points and available parking. Chair Butler stated that when the Commission discussed this in 2010 his thoughts were that it would be nice to have a small park that would connect to the open space but did not believe the configuration would work with that idea. Mr. Haas identified an area where a small park could be placed near the open space. Regular Andover Park & Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes —March 6, 2014 Page 3 Chair Butler stated that there is quite a bit of open space between the two City purchases and noted that there are only 49 housing units between the two additions of the development. Commissioner Miskowiec stated that it would be nice to have another access point to the open space that has active play equipment. Mr. Haas identified a water main loop that will be created and will tie in with Country Oaks North. He stated that the water main would have a 20 -foot easement and noted that a park could be placed in the area of Lot 18. He explained that a trail could be created to lead to the open space. Commissioner Lindahl stated that because that location is more secluded it would not receive as much use from the development. Commissioner Miskowiec confirmed the location of a wetland it was confirmed that area was a DNR protected wetland. Chair Butler stated that this is not a huge development and questioned if the Commission wants a park there. Commissioner Stenzel agreed that this development is not large but noted that there are adjacent lots that could develop in the future as well. Commissioner Lindahl stated that it would be helpful to have the trail connection to the open space. Commissioner Stenzel referenced lot 31, which would provide a trail to the open space and additional area that could be used for a park. Chair Butler agreed that a small shelter or tot lot would fit in that location. Larry Emerich, 1341 1615 Avenue NW, displayed a map of the area which identifies the nearby open space areas and the land he is proposing to develop. He noted that the ghost plat that was completed with the White Pines Wilderness 1" Addition displayed a trail connection to the open space. He stated that the crossing at 1615 Avenue NW is very safe. He stated that the City currently has a trail that ends at 159`h Avenue and noted that the trail could be extended 1,000 feet to reach 1615 Avenue NW to provide people with a safe crossing, which could lead into the open space. He stated that there is also a trail that comes out at Crane Street North and would also feel comfortable with a connection to that point in order to maintain a safe connection. He explained that with the current situation, as he will begin with maybe one third of the development, he would be concerned with traffic that would come through the neighborhoods where children are playing to reach the open space. He noted that the parking lot for the open space has not yet been constructed and was concerned with the traffic and parking that would come Regular Andover Park & Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes — March 6, 2014 Page 4 through the neighborhood. He stated that he is not against a trail access or small park but was unsure that this was the right moment in time to complete those actions. He stated that the better time might be in the future when additional facilities exist. Chair Butler questioned if Mr. Emerich believed that the neighborhood would want to see a park. Mr. Emerich stated that currently there are families with small children living in the first addition of the development and advised that each family has their own play equipment in their yard. He advised that the minimum price for the development is $450,000 and the lots are larger than City standards. Commissioner Miskowiec stated that the Commission thinks in terms of community as well and questioned where residents would meet and gather within this planned development. He believed that a community gathering spot would be a draw for the development. Chair Butler thanked Mr. Emerich for his time and input. He stated that the Park Commission does not have jurisdiction over County or City trails. Commissioner Lindahl stated that he does see a potential problem with parking. Commissioner Miskowiec acknowledged that there would be a transition time before the parking lot could be constructed and agreed that there may be some short term parking issues. Commissioner Stenzel stated that he would still prefer lot 31 and confirmed that the lot extends to 161St Avenue NW and questioned if there would be sufficient space for a trail connection, park and parking lot. Mr. Haas noted the location of wetlands in that area which would not make that action possible. Chair Butler questioned if the Commission should consider waiting for a park until an adjacent parcel develops, to the north of this property, which could also provide access to the open space. He stated that at that point perhaps the desire would be for a larger park, compared to a tot lot. He stated that to begin with he was in favor of connecting to the open space and creating a small community gathering but was not in favor of accepting land because of the traffic problems that would be created for this small development. Commissioner Lindahl agreed that with two cul -de -sacs there would be traffic problems created. Mr. Haas confirmed that a trail easement for lot 31 and between lots 17 and 18 could be included in the recommendation along with cash in lieu of parkland. Regular Andover Park & Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes —March 6, 2014 Page 5 Motion by Lindahl, seconded by Stenzel, to recommend approval of a park dedication in the form of cash in lieu of parkland for White Pine Wilderness 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat with trail easements provided on lot 31 and between lots 17 and 18. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 1 -nays (Miskowiec), 1- absent (Marinello) vote. DISCUSS SUR VEY RES UL TS FOR HOCKEY RINK IMPR0YEMENTS /HIDDEN NORTH PARK Butler provided background information regarding the possible relocation of an or hockey rink. He noted that one possible location for that outdoor rink was Creek North Park and advised that a survey was distributed. Mr. Haase lained that the Park and Recreation Commission is requested to discuss the survey result for hockey rink improvements at Hidden Creek North Park and receive input from the eighborhood. He summarized the results of the survey for the Commission. H oted that the neighborhood was invited to attend the meeting tonight to provide input. Ndisplayed a picture of the park and identified where the hockey rinks and play equip nt could potentially be located. Chair Butler stated that h 'nterpretation of the survey results were that some of the residents were concerned wN the aesthetics of a hockey rink in that park. He also had concern with over programmin the park. Commissioner Miskowiec stated th it was nice to hear the input of the residents and the residents oppose the idea. He also ex essed concern with over programming the park. He stated that the intent was to determin if this would be a possibility and it appears more and more that this would not be a go option. Mike Olson, 13693 Hidden Creek Drive, state at he is the original owner of the home and therefore was in the home before the park wa even constructed. He stated that the hockey rink would literally be in his backyard and s opposed to that idea. He stated that they enjoy the park as it is with the ball field and lay equipment. He was concerned with lights and a hockey rink in that area during the win r months. He stated that if the money is going to be spent to create a hockey rink he beli ed that the deteriorating rink should simply be repaired rather than relocating it. Commissioner Miskowiec explained that the Crooked Lake rink School District land and the City runs into the issue of spending City funds on School trict property. He explained that it what is driving this possible relocation. Chair Butler confirmed that the Commission is just investigating possible locations. Mr. Olson thanked the Commission for investigating and hoped that the Commission would select another location other than this park. ;I \ \ I I !/ I e51% ti�a' 8 s / I � / I / / Yv lill� , I ,I \ tl n� A II �1 I� •� IL l II plo/Ir =3z J1.12 0 24 o(eu k \ m I 1 Tryon•- >z -xa- 1 -oozi 03'1_ NQeN nnoown I ! ioloMI Ne •oat Co­ OI WROi / WA P .-, WE MLDERHESS -^ v / P1O /1a -J2- 24-21 ^a// wl \• 5 °ly or eneel.�: 1� N How - N°INaoet OW°In 0 Iha(Np w.M °Wu ,N \ (� S.clbn 11.JOwnaMp 321 N°qe 2 °'1 y l Nonh ,me .r uw Sws a al Quotrry / 4so Nu- la l.many ]2. Fw9. 1i '- s _ cm L� I / It z / N to I s _ cm ( S` cm j I� i roof It / N Z _rn O C= rp TV .J O I b� 1 NW v M R"' Ilnp way O, M ly � -•I al°nl r r w )o �8 _E1 / ).58 _ � _______ � ._- - - —.a.- _—_— ter ��._..� _ —�r _—let _ n _— ° — -_ hl( 7i F �h" T r-nn hllnl m 5"uln line "1 Ine Su.ingatOwaler- vl-ynr NmMuevL Cu Ir _ _ _ _ Iv Imo` 1, -. n V 1 -I v _ � � Sec,Mn 1<, i.manlp 72. flan9a 2a •r � -, � - y4 ^__ IVYv T \ — _ _ -_ I \ I — y / N u u j °•" °s YQY Z g8S ._ •8r° 11f insY`.13°i5�3 il� -t €� ;I i iMMI €fai g $ �SY 9. �$a s s =YS =es4 a °s ; �y�yi■ f: @'a4' ^lggfs�wpi@: y�g� x;qx 3y a 3 F :Ra v I w p!Az -s S'�pg 3 "a Jw SY RY °�I "S S� sl€ � ixii }Ss v p 55y '$3 £ Y ',. a• s v�ini'4'J %gxpiepa �Y ! t .i',� Y to a 3 V x °� N I I I N N I I I I I U I II M I N II II InOm ° ;ey�`a ? ie� - -.84 7 tay 9� 3 a 2HgH om o ° 0aomo00 oa lnx ,no amp mr„ i F 'H ° S e. E yY 4 g a�o�l m mmm a as or r. 6Y �ra9O &" 3 S e13 az i z izzzzzzz -'e na z� m oo Si9 sgg" ° °�N g � .Ye $$ }v x S S G_ o o a 0 0 0 0 0 000n Sv 8: @' S-g ; i4 gs }�+' �_ W @'J- ids 30• o2 gII M � r7 MIMm AP MA Kzz-i aa0- aS �� °Y S �av ° B. Sni�Cgs° LL mzizo, m In m w m In m ow.00 n� <rY- yo9z mm r is sPSSS y^ H y 5 4' S 'i�u �_ 3f 9 H �% q p OZm 'E8 S �_.-Y e rrrNN.iii Pa S ETF_ S 1iw i$ QQ et Z 9 s F ^s ml^N m mam,n 'F OCCMYj wr;5 ! r4 $ 3"j`g^ ,{p,�g3 ;. 8 8 a a�'S 4R v x 6 c (7 OO a a zzz rsiAl m5 �nm iN xO� fNnp ri S9> p 0 4Su Y >yg °gig 3>i��i S3S-yy • i 3 3 ^ ��n ��3p y y 6 rt A? ^7 A °Om Ivl ° y i- °Y_9�' N3. S pp �/e$ �4 °9!{ Y S c 3 : , 8' m rti A cmi a m mN°m cps �] ? 3d L'�3> S F i g ialrg S Si P. 603 SI y Sz• 3 s$)yPy 4) LJ a s r a A l i N 2 y ° w°p z F pC p Y bf °m 4� $i aj S - °uu p� ° ° °G L °E� ! ±i >t ° e $Y5 NNZ A ° p m I" Zp m S r Z^ b ome" -VNIM 11 8 ,-i :11411;5111 1d io S„ � y�4 Pe Y 8 3Y2 s?p aN z $F n�lry g ^ g'�33g�,!°Y� go` > ]'s Sj=YpSFg °v °q} g gq3 '�"s� r i 1° i CFIm �n q9g,: °= w, g r p6 €1 °E 1° H_!1' 1.yy 'qj iE 4 Imn n m 390.^y @`93 eo rg;3y; - %-gq�- i°SkE ^I9��I � 4 1 mo ^-la i g s aSg "�°' S:� s EQi8lga° r O8s9S »8SS :Q m z 9 gn° -:n e 4 S no���^ °Y ° }3 6g j a "`4 = s s4. €q;3$- Preliminary Flat DATE REVISION Licens d Professional that this survey, pion Dr°wN er sM I here certify = v of a epOA was p epa ed by TG or undo Ty 3 19 14 RE SONS PCR C direct super ision and that I am O duly 5 1} 14 REMOVE NORTH LO1S White Pine Wilderness essional Land Surveyor Under 6 Il 14 gEYBE LOT AYOUi NhE IOW� //fit E (O ( In GEO2a. ) 2z la REV15ON5 ET per. Second Addition h-mlHakanson And /A /�� B le I♦ FENS ONS PER Cltt COMMENTS 5OflLE 60' C.N Eogi vws and Lme Survay°a �GN for - eON INUmloO s a.0a, L.&.' Mln.ee.1. 55303 Charles R. Christophers n oe E z /s /la White Pine Wilderness, LLC 763-427-WO FAX )s] -.2) -0520 Dale zLLI< Lic. No. 18420 ..n.o -FAX 75 p,al4 Nw.wsax avornsoN. INC. - 878 - EXISTING LEGEND � � I -- %ISTING CONTOUR / rrv1'i1lrlUrr\r J A\ \ r � \ 1 P -11 ✓� ` \ _ 1 ` r \� %� da l � 1 I ° "° 11 ,: %I 1G1 , oa " 1 l 5' A �I ` r �\` A � � ` PROPERTY BOUNDARY EDGE WATER SBk12 DELINEATED WETLAND jEMO E EXFSTIAN6 TREE LINE SEPTI SYSTEM, FEMA 100 -YEAR FLOOD FRINGE BOUNDARY r I ... FEMA 500—YEAR FLOOD ^SB�IO ��g . \!� I \ \\ `\ \�• _ i _ a I \ 06- r I III 1 1 r I —•• -•— FEMA 100 -YEAR FLOODWAY FRINGE BOUNDARY 's GAS LINE nlhnp r _ „Ko °ice i BURIED TELEPHONE LINE 1 t � BURIED ELECTRIC LINE OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE re�e- ul BURIED CABLE N LINE Y O EXISTING UTILITY PEDESTAL _ _ \ , I „ EXISTING LIGHT POLE � / r , \ urhnlll __ - -�_ tc Orr' —_ `�\ •\ \ r i ' . ✓ 06 U \ r —rH _ EXISTING CURB STOP off EXISTING GATE VALVE I I / I _ _ _ A `,', EXISTING HYDRANT to , I v v f r ,,,,•. ," r11ri�. r r r 1 ii l�i ' E EXISTING SEWER SERVICE j lallo Ia n �ra6 w� 1 v`r f / -air 1 `r c _- eaI n Ill lIlI h l.luIlllll l k T l , I lI irIilIr ry Il'r q/ /nill t"\ t \I \ r \ r r r / / (v - ���•,' " "a065 __ \` IJ 1O rl i , / I / `o -_\ I � y J i • ' / I ! a/!rl , / rI/r 1 .�:. � \ \�`. \� r i\ r I . 1 I IIIII a .' o EXISTING WATER SERVICE \ < EXISTING SANITARY SEWER Ili EXISTING WATERMAIN it `I lrlllr,lulil llv Idl,lluc 1 v r r <� i _ r .tib •lo r, / / v ` r I ys L ". NOrry p= Arv'r . r r r VIII 0 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE tlullllll i v I�,pnrrm v t ,r , r �__go3 1 'A rr rr _ r r I II ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN I IIILIIIII 1111111 A A,rrr 1111 A A ,r I YJ I / 4 " ��v��__ -,, 1 -II I 1I1I'IgIIrIrINYr r v v_" �' 4 !]�k vp vv v�v� vV v - ,4J , v v £ 't ,ArAIAI 1;�� r I I � I 1 -II I ®EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE /OUTLET STRUCTURE O6 EXISTING STORM SEWER u 41n't • k - �r I � � P EXISTING FLARED END SECTION EXISTING RIPRAP r _ _ M- _ r •� / /f II 0 _P - i EXISTING CONCRETE CURB g CUTTER '. =/- REMOVE 9�< 1 r Ir I Ilia SOIL BORING PIEZOMETER LOCATIONS PER GRADING , �, -�� \r\\1r\1\ SHED` ' \ 0 b \` i \�^ ' \ y 1!; I 1111 -F SB �/9 PLAN OF WH TE PINE WILDERNESS PREPARED BY I r b r I I I' � I � P -1 � JOHN OLIVER &ASSOCIATES DATED 9/13/06 � .- ririy CLEAR AND GRUB TREES 0 1 ` _ _ �v yr x Ih REMOVE GRAVEL r REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REGRADE DITCH (SEE SHEET 7) SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT \ \\ _ / / ` o`O' :`- I ! �' �• \\ 1 r \'\ 1 \ \\ ` 4 \ 'rIl,A'I �\��\� REMOVE 31 SY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (GRADE DITCH TO DRAIN EAST) RELOCATE MAILBOX AND SUPPORT __ n, 111111 1 ink STGPIS 1iPJ 111 111 REMOVE SKIMMER W : �' ",/ / S� �v `_ Ilr o hr�r 9y ip�l v I it i it sbs- yc yob STRUCTURE. 112LF 15" RCP \ yr _� _ pr — _ 1 AND 2 15" RC APRONS .l /y 006 _ .: tlr I1rd 0 I /tl[ 1r 1r1 - / /�R T7I ( ) Abe / i -_ hli, SAtI?.4GE �iYDITANTvAND� I Nr '�YiEMOVE- „`,' I Illlr ap5 = € ulI RETr(0a 8��F8� b�ERvv i r1 =iI1iVfGNS �riy ;rr;s - - v�r ry v f1 REMOVE BLF 15" RCP REMOVE SKIMMER Irlr ae I� i,l , : 1 ` s STRUCTURE, 86LF 15" RCP y, ' �� - 'gAND GAT_ A- Il, / -r r r „' AND 15” RC APRON AND 15" RC APRON ,iii yfy',l /I a'°� __i �",l IYj r li IIVI� I s`g I pl.. I I / // rill `T`s REMOVE MANHOLE, ' ` r Existing / /t /�rrl r �I v _ "SCI i lil r -,� I I 48LF C RCP AND rl i I �J �- e, V III ` �`� 00 — / 1 1 f 1" P -3� ND 168LF 2.ykbRC � r r r Sys r/ 11 11 �"i I 21" RC APRON I / / 9rg na�e_rfc- tltilitY \ Easement -- tr — L f= �j�f4� I I Ilr '� 1 1 ���—tytEMOVE' —CATCH ASIN I '` LTP� n I II I 6 A I >,;,'' � SAWCUT 5LF (FULL DEPTH)- - J 60 0 60 Ito AND REMOVE 20LF CONCRETE CURB SCALE IN FEET SAWCUT-28LT FULL DEPTH) AND REMOVE 31 SY _ BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GENERAL NOTES: rr ( 1 I ! SB//17 �, _ _ / - - - - -'- I- ! I 1. CONTRACTOR MAY SALVAGE AND INSTALL EXISTING PIPE AND I I STRUCTURES AS APPROPRIATE. NEW GASKETS SHALL BE 2. ALL EXISTING SIGN REMOVAL SHALL BE DONE BY THE CITY. 3. SITE TOPOGRAPHY CONDUCTED BY HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES (12/2013), ADJACENT PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY BY , - "' i % / `- , I 1 I MnGEO LIDAR MAPPING (2 FOOT CONTOURS). i -" DATE REVISION I hereby artily that This plan, specification, or report w°. oaa�n: ---- me or °nder m peryisian and' ^ °' I- " - -""- EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND SHEET 3/20/14 CI REVIEW 1 prepared by y direct sv CJJ Hakanson Anderson s °a 6 -)'I 2 14 CITY R W 2 am a duly Licensed Pro essional Engineer under the lows 14 CITY REVIEW o/ the S le of ^ ^•`° RU'sM n: Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors WHITE PINE WILDERNESS REMOVALS PLAN JAP 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 SECOND ADDITION or RAIC JOCHUM, P.E.* rt: 763- 427 -5860 FAX 763- 427 -0520 10 x Dote 2/6! Ot Lic. No. 23461 CJJ www.hokcnson- anderson.com CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA sHEETs 3831. n3 CONSTRUCT A 10 FOOT ,� / 1 v" i IND LEGE , r / 9 - -- 878- - -- EXISTING CONTOUR WIDE EARiNEN 0O WETLAND 3 I , r -878- PROPOSED CONTOUR OVERFLOW ONITNE r r '' \ .. \\ (DNR WETLAND 427W) I -------- EASEMENT LINE SOUTH SIDE OFI THE 1 \ ` -+ FEMA FLOOD ELEV =897.5 WETLAND 1 WETLAND At AN I r +�� -� ; . 'vh I - - - SETBACK LINE NGWL =895.0 ELEVATION OF 01.8 0 1 '< ; - FEMA 100 -YEAR FLOOD FRINGE _ . D 100 -YR HWL =902.0 6A ,13 �`' / U O \� •- ••- _-- •••- -- BOUNDARY 0500 -YEAR FLOOD FRINGE r.! , 1® 901.5. ooti • �� .- , goT 9 0 II °N OrO • o `� .9 \ i BOUNDARY % 1 1 ;11,1 - 9027 X01..- 9b I I I `,a• - '8 901.8 - 9 b.5 pd PROPOSED GATE VALVE 2 02.82.5" PE�SP 5,.5` \RING r\ fi °r "�{ 1 Q �' ` C�URS� (SPW €A�2 q) ",0y{�ER (i % ' Y% PROPOSED HYDRANT QsB�/8 - -- - I s�B7 8 Y i I -- - -- �\1 v 0 '7 •/ ,1 4 "; CLA 5 AU"OREGA,E',IBASE \ t l I < PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE 1 -_i I _ 9116._ 1_._ �._. 7j _ ;. / y ,' 6. , .� .l ! PROPOSED WATER SERVICE P -11 p �•, "" 1', 't PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER ;SB #1 O / •' SB 9 - - ++ L a?� I •. i OT' _ y n.wear J , \ t4 h I -' -'- PROPOSED WATERMAIN r `- f ;�'' - LO ,p 890 'I FEZ --- I L0 =904 I I F8L(T• I � \� � UPS APPR VED t6i -Uf(IT i m PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER / I; I..L 4.5 1 `•_� 1 ,, -`-906 1 CLUSTER BX PER 4 '� MANHOLE (� r.I LF =907,1 I 0 =gp2, ,� I 15 PROPOSED CATCH BASIN 768 SF '1 G 9 k B,i 4 LF5901.5 I ; LF =899.5 I _� -8" 1 i tii89t� .. g I i/ `i < •' %� 1, %Fo WETLAND % - _:I I F--990 7. _ 1 , F =905.8 I 1 a , 4t ®PROPOSED STORM SEWER ( -- -' -' ­J PACT --1 1 t i P_ i 1_ GF =906.1 P _ 5 i 8' $ ITUMINOUS YRAI�,� "'r 1 II )i F' MANHOLE -_ -- - -- -- - - -- -- ST -- `< PROPOSED STORM SEWER i "5 x �' 1 D STANDARD DRAWING END SECTION 6 __ SO1 0� 1 I 06 I - _- - - -- - - _ i \ RE NRVLD�A ;'� TRAIL - PROPOSED RIPRAP PER CITY / 6 I' I ' 8S I p 04, <r -r EASEMENT 895.6 _ ___ -. ,1 STANDARD DRAWING N0. 411A F PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB A �4.q 8 GUTTER W .tea 'aos, CONSTRUCTION BUFFER 991' W'bl •qN Wj '� ' % �.' ..bOL'SB #1 - °o' �• %'U ��` V i (�I F T`_ ®MAINTENANCE VEHICLE V HI E ` 1,�' ;�' %\\ ,\ \�' G' ( � 'I no. '�•''ui I,• `'\ I �` ` �. - 5••901'.0 ,.`y •II •� �r ACCESS •f`,1 3 o ao 0. •ar •o° �YT, `\v �_ ROCK CONSTRUCTION q 1. J I , mrn 3 9p _ 0 _d�',� •� 1 - I k ENTRANCE PER CITY 11,1'• , CONSTRUCT m I �� `^ - `A,,1 1 I II J _ STANDARD DETAIL NO. 605 41 r S CABLE A.CONCRETE _ f OVERFLOW t . ° 9 5.7 -- `�• o° I f ,,4 j 'k j 7 P a _ m al 1!J �- // / /// PROPOSED INSULATION _- m� _ 0 1 '.0 }�-�- SILT FENCE ' . _ _._ __ - • � �_ ERTt1 � a o J .♦J' • ` \ •L•1\ -c bOb _ - -.w ` 1 �° 3 _ -moo mm ;> '` I ` %,6 - -. _ P 1 lF rn. -- '.1 - � SOIL BORING PIEZOMETER _ o It 11 '.I m o +I I m 11' II m SBy9 LOCATIONS PER GRADING PLAN P -1 � OF WHITE PINE WILDERNESS ` _.- _ - H 11 m I •4t _ PREPARED BY JOHN OLIVER & t 9 .4 v -- - - 1� `? mLL� 1 �i 'J 1,895 SF ,i ; `• - _ __ -- _ ,o II 1 FLOODED - ASSOCIATES DATED 9/13/06 Oro 4 .y 0.. 9 `. BASIN. ALLY S I F < , 11 II d • ORIGINALLY 4� @ "1 ^ DELINEATED + DENOTES DROPPING GARAGE ' •• - -- , }� r 4 �I• , FLOOR ONE COURSE ` 908 w� `96790g F\ G�i��O�a` �•_ 89 2 1 i FLOOR TWO DROPPING GARAGE TWOCOUR ES _ _ , • -- 6 ` �i F�' \ f 1 O �� o- IT 7 _ +x+ DENOTES DROPPING GARAGE FLOOR THREE COURSES _ ti06• - �� �GF 907 $ % �� I �� 9 PRO- - - _� j STORM SEWER STRUCTURE _ - -- V� LFr900.8 r1_- - NUMBER JI tsxz PROPOSED STREET GRADE v I L.v �� n 9.•'A 'E.O.F, `<. i 1`, no °' •t -:� ® PROPOSED STREET CENTERLINE �•`, \`1`•._ _ Oro• _� _' ELEVATION �, '; $99.4 < •. `, _ _I`,, _ mm 3 t _ =9C H °F:-m i ( 898.5 PROPOSED PROPERTY CORNER ELEV (\ - - 900 {r I I rya' ',` 9P :I.• ' = OAF'• p. -� _ X 898.5 PROPOSED INTERMEDIATE SPOT ELEV I I / ® INLET PROTECTION DEVICE 1 , 66a - , o l ` - /• - - FBWO FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT 896.5 t 1tJFILTRAfi10N 1 - - _ J ` �• _ r Jb `b , r 895 '' FBLO FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT NGWL =895.0 Ir ro -0 �, g i+ GF GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION .L6g �• BOTTOM =898.0 - 56fl -8 I N- p N m4 LF LOW FLOOR ELEVATION NWL =899.7 = 'r _ LO LOOKOUT ELEVATION 100 -YR HWL =899.8 903.5• GENERAL NOTES: WETLAND 2 55. I 1506, _ - 1 t. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE 1V:4H OR RATTER. ,b9 NGWL =895.0 899 tl _ - _IL( 2. THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE LOWER RUM RIVER 1 - -- NWL =897.4 1 I • -904J E 0 F: ! t - - \ WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION BOUNDARIES. P j �; 100 -YR HWL =898.1 9 1 _� L'.P.F� 90d 0`. /• II 1 POND 2-' I L. I REFERENCE NOTES: 8 6.9 /% o I - CONSTRUCT f o , 1 , - - _ ^ 5 I I _ I I I 1;; 10 BITUMINOUS TRAIL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF \ I CABLE CONCRETE 03.T i�l n NGWL> -895.0 L' 1 - -_ _ C 89$ f ' I ` I' -- - II`r . % "'� N}YL- 896.5 I I ANDOVER STANDARD DRAWING N0. 7149. PEDESTRIAN %• �' \ YERF O 1 'I b, �1 ; - -� _ .- L , CURB RAMP SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT 161ST LANE NW O PER FL _ - 1 _ -�- J'i t 1 !,1' # X 100 -YR _HWL= BIP, {.8 I: AND SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY OF e _ - { 00 }•'� I I %I f�_3 I' �/ I I f 1 ANDOVER STANDARD DRAWING NO. 7198. TRUNCATED i \t �� r _.��i / ^ I,� ^ i,l % 1 DOMES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MN /DOT STANDARD PLATE 7038. r 11 t �I - II I Q RETAINING WALL SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY I i � /. .. - � � r / t I / "`` I /- � "- I � 11 ; i STANDARD DRAWING N0. 611. FINAL WAIL DESIGN SHALL POND 4' �I II Y - I (`V tt1!' • II j r I I' I 1 BE COMPLETED BY THE BLOCK MANUFACTURER'S r r l NGWL =895.0 �// _ I ENGINEER. .mj i rr NWL =897.0 E.O.F. 100 -YR NWL = 897.8- - -c 50 O 50 100 NI FEET o DATE REVISION i h.reby ..nil, thol IN. plan, sped0co,lon, or r.port woa R9aE0 R: •-- a ar.d D me or andar m direct su .rvlsion end ,hot 1 `- -` - - -' - -- Hokanson Anderson r a 2417414 REVISED HWLS PER LRRWMO REVIEW ompa dulyyUCensatl Prole ;o� l En n ar und.r th. Inw. cJJ -� -- GRADING DRAINAGE AND EROSION SHEET 3 ZD 14 CITY REVIEW , al the 5tol c/ Min esotc. ° 9I . MssX e: Civil Engineers and Land Surveyor CONTROL PLAN ° = 6 12 14 CITY REVIEW 12 4 y WHITE PINE WILDERNESS DF 2z to c1TY REV IEW 3 JA p 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 SECOND ADDITION 8/18/14 CITY REVIEW 4 „g INDO B: 763- 427 -5860 FAX 763 -427 -0520 r Date 2/6/1 RAIC J. JOCNUM, P.E. - - - - - 10 Lic. No. 23467 CJJ www.hokonson- anderson.com CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA SHEETS %AiI nT 60 0 60 120 SCALE IN FEET TREE PROTECTION DELINEATION p . � �6 ELEVATION VIEW NO SCALE DELINEATION OF TREE LINE PROTECTION SHALL IDEALLY BE LOCATED AT THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE DRIPLINE. WOODLOT MIN 6' MIN ALLA4LAA4AJ 1. STANDARD 48" HIGH SNOW FENCE OR ORANGE SAFETY TREE PROTECTION FENCE. DELINEATION 2.CAUTION RIBBON 4" WIDE MAY BE USED AS PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION OR APPROVED EQUAL. PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION MAY ONLY BE UTILIZED TO DELINEATE TREE SAVE AREAS WHICH ARE REMOTE FROM AREAS OF LAND DISTURBANCE. 3.STEEL POSTS AS NEEDED. 4.DELINEATION OF TREE LINE PROTECTION SHALL EXTEND CONTINUOUSLY THROUGH PROTECTION AREAS, TOTALLY SURROUND INDIVIDUAL SPECIMENS AS NOTED, OR EXTEND ACROSS THE FACE AND THE ENDS SHALL EXTEND 6' BACK FOR INDIVIDUAL TREE LINE PROTECTION. ® INFILTRATION BASIN SIGN PER G)3 ® TREE SAVE AREA -+ A TREE PROTECTION FENCE 10 18" MIN. 4 "TREE SAVE 12" MIN. AREA 111 1. SIGN TO BE PLACE 100' O.C. ALONG FENCE THRU WOODED LOT AREA, ON INDIVIDUAL SPECIMENS WHERE NOTED, AND ONE ON EACH TREE LINE AREA TO BE SAVED. SIGNS TO BE AFFIXED TO STEEL POSTS. 2. ALL PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY "KEEP OUT" OR "TREE SAVE AREA" SIGNAGE. y I ! ^I TYPICAL SIGN ^ GL ,NOTES: No sE I1. NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORT WILL 1, OCCUR WITHIN THE WOODLAND SIDE OF PROTECTIVE DELINEATION WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. ^ I' 12. ERECT PROTECTIVE DELINEATION CONTINUOUSLY ALONG DRIP LINE OF SIGNIFICANT TREES CLOSEST APPROVAL BY ENGINEER FINS THE FIELD. FINAL SECURE DELINEATION TO METAL POSTS SUBJECT AT TO HEIGHT OF 4 FEET. 3 GRADING CONTRACTORS COMMENCE L PROTECTIVE B AND HAVE BEEN BRIEFED ON PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES. ALL 4. NO TRENCH FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE PERMITTED ON THE WOODLAND SIDE OF PROTECTIVE DELINEATION. - -- - J 5. IF PRUNING IS NECESSARY, PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON FOR SPECIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS OF TREE REPLACEMENT RESULTING (, I FROM DAMAGE TO TREES WITHIN PROTECTED AREAS. - - 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PROTECTIVE DELINEATION AND SIGNS IN GOOD REPAIR THROUGHOUT DURATION OF PROJECT. - - - 8. ALL UTILITIES INSTALLED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE WITHIN STREET �\ RIGHTS -OF -WAY OR UTILITY EASEMENTS. 9. CONTACT THE CITY FORESTER (ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT) AT 755 -5100 TO ARRANGE A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH THE CITY FORESTER /TREE INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBANCE. - - - -- 10. ALL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. 11. ORANGE POLY SAFETY FENCE OR ORANGE SILT FENCE SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE DRIPLINE OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY FORESTER. REFERENCE NOTES: 10 ALL OTHER TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PASSIVE. UAIt I RLV1510N i hereby cerfty that this plan, specllicaron, or report was OE bM0 IF. ASHEETS 3 20 ,4 CITY REVIEW 1 prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I GJJ - - -- Hakanson Anderson TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 6 12 14 CITY REVIEW 2 am a duty licensed Proles•ional Engineer ender the laws AND WETLAND SIGNING 7 2 l4 ITT R VI W 3 or the stet r uin sam. No"".. Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors WHITE PINE WILDERNESS JAP _ - 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 SECOND ADDITION IG J. JOCHUM, P.E. O(On e. .. 763- 427 -5860 FAX 763 - 427 -0520 Date 2/6/201114 Lic. No. 234.61 CJJ www.hakanson- anderson.co n CITY OP ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 0 CO 126 2'X3• (420) RIM =904.04 INV= 901.04 4N X 1 37LF 12" RCP ¢ 1 SAN/M8 13 8•X8' 1 ` RIM =904.65 DIP TEE 8 "X6" DIP TEE, CB I31 3OLF, 8'X6" DIP REDUCER, (S)INV= 896.02 12LF 6' DIP, 6" 2'X3' (420) 1$' RCP t OLF 6' DIP, 6" GATE '(N.W)INV= 896,12 8' GATE GATE VALVE d RIM=903.34 O'd53X SAN /MH 12 1 VALVE tNVs900,S4 VALVE d BOX AND d BOX BOX AND RIM= 903.90 35LF (INC. RC APRON HYDRANT - -- _ - HYDRANT _8w 722, 1/2• = - (SW)IRV 895.12 POND 2 SKIMMER ) DIP BEND (N)INV= 895.22 STRUCTURE 01 18' RCP O 0.29% 8" PVC CAP 78LF B" PVC O 0.40% 1 INV =896.85 ,- 12 +00 8 " -22 1/ SAN/MR 11 182LF r -� 13 +00 0 20'OL 8 PVC O b,40X 7 DIP BEN RIM- 904.55 \ 8" PVC III. 11 +00 18' RC APRON O 0.40X (SW)INV= 894.70 INV =896.40 24 RCP (NE)INV= 894.80 / 7 _ \ 18' BULKHEAD O 0.50 pxpp 136LF 8 / s12LF RC APRON u7LF - _.. ..., ` PVC a 0.40% (INC. ( ) INY= 901.24 8' GATE 18' RCP 30LF ,VALVE °a 71LF INV= 893.00 1'¢' RCP O - 15.91% IB' RCP CB MH 127 g 24" RCP 1 1 O 0.50% 0 0.50% n d BOX 48" DIA. (421 i 3 O 0.49% RIM =903.92 g2 CB /MH 125 Ca/mm (433 (NW)INV=899 //793a, / 48' DIA. (421) ) (NE)INV =900L4 t RIM= 904.29 RIM =904.29 53LF (S)INY= 899.59 a I - (NE)INV= 900.25 21' RCP SUMP = 897,59 _ . I (N)INV= 900,50 (SE)INV= 900.05 O 0.49% SAN MN 10 _ l (SW)INV= 900.40 SUMP= 898.05 n '- _. / RIM= 904.45 ` 1 SUMP =898.40 -- - _.. (W)INV= 894.06. 1 -8" DIP - 27" RC APRON I WATERMAIN CB /MH 130 1 (NE)INV= 890.16 1 INV= 897.96 i 49' IM= (4zq / e• -22 1/2• RIM = 903.34 DIP BEND 1 POND 2 _ -*- - -- - (S)INV= 898.73 ,p ( 451E (INC. RC APRON) V 100 -7R HWL =897.8 \�- \ 245LE I (N)INV- 898.83 m 27" RCP O 0.49% _ ¢ 9 "X6' DIP TEE, 1 a" PVC 1 I O 0.40X (E)INV= 899.58 14LF 6" DIP, 6' 1 \� SUMP = 896.73 i ` GATE VALVE d BOX - - AND HYDRANT 1` INV= 897.10 DIP BEND / 1 _ - 8" DIP X11 WATERMAIN ` 1 v ep 11 CB /MH 122 i m \ r 8 "X6• DIP REDUCER. 60" DIA. (421) / /l m I 330LF m \ _ _ B' PVC ,I 1011 fi' DIP, 6" GATE RIM= 903.56 \� VALVE d OX ANDD (N)INV= 898.38 i z O 0.40% _ \ (W)IHY =898.18 \ SUMP =896.18 - fT 1 V / 1 zo ... A8 "IDIA. (421) 1 O RIM= 904.50 ' _O \ (S)INV=896.833 1 21" (INC. 1, APRON) 1 S INV= 911 :13 21' RCP O 1,59% POND 1 SKIMMER STRUCTURE 1 m $UMPs894.03 , / 11 - _ -899.8 -_65LF o'r INV RL APRON ' / 2YLF (INC. RC APRON) 7B" RCP INV= 894.00 1 IS' RCP O 0.31% - - CB 124 O - 16.67X 46' DIA. (421) / 84LF / 897.8- - \ 21' RCP I RIMINV=890 / � � (N)INV =896. -es• / 18' RC APRON / O D.50X VINV= $96.52 INV= 897.35 / 15" RC APRON 8 " -45' (W)INV=897.08 INV= 893.00 Lr DIP BEND SUMP = 894.52 / 44LF (INC. 2 RC APRONS) 18" CP ��tt 15" RC APRON 1 / IH" RCP O 0.80% POND 1 O O.b7% N / / ) 100 -YR 1 CONNECT TO EXIS ING a I 1 INV= 896.80 1 / 18' RC APRON WL =897.0 GATE VALVE AND [gOX I Mo CONNECT TO EXIITING I 100 YB HWL -898.1 \ \ INV = 997.00 11\` 11 2✓3' (4120 - v ly 8' PVC $ANITAR7 $EWER ` ' / I INV =892.74 (PER ICITY AS- BUILTS) RIM = 903.05 INV= 900.05 1 1 1 n l OLF 12" ce RCP O 2300% v 11 48 "IDIA. (421) n _-d11i� 5 \ II RIM= 903.05 I 1 /REFERENCE NOTES: (E)INV= 897.501 sD o So 100 / CONSTRUCT SKIMMER STRUCTURE PER (W)INV= 897.60 i(E XISTING) > CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO, 417 1 sUMP= e95.50 A 1 SCALE w FEET \ 5 ) 1{ V I COi{NECT TO EXISTING 21" RCP STORM SEWER 3 DATE REVISION thereby certify that ruts plan, specification, or report was 0@OO R: -- i 3 20 14 CITY REVIEW i1 prepared by me or under my direct supervislcn and that 1 �---- Hakansan Anderson UTILITY PLAN SHEET 5 12Z14 CITY REVIEW 2 am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws CdJ fl 1( '1.7 11 Anderson J 1' g Ih. St. Mi scale WHITE PINE WILDERNESS = 7 22/14 CITY REVIEW e3 PAMN B: Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 9i UAp 3601 TFlurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 SECOND ADDITION of RAIG J. JOCHUM, P.E, amp R: 763- 427 -5860 FAX 763 - 427 -0520 10 r Dote 21611 Lic. No. 23461 CJJ www.hokonson- anderson.com CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA sHEETs - - - - L - (� a S i (i) , W __ I� Q 0 III III :! \��/ \.�•• —��/ o of : ) i I \ •��\ )� — ( / I atj seps L Sapp -, , -' — — a � � ;�!,^ v ` l v� �Av, fi� � .� I I ' • / � � 1 '. �sePO / olalyte vv� III dq �. �' IIR1 A A � I� /.��•%' a � $ $ /;' � t P -s � )� P � ! ICI o I— — w / � � — _ —_ �I"�: I T I X11 `� i of _L., LEG ND —FEMA 100 -YEAR FLOOD FRINGE BOUNDARY • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • FEMA 500 -YEAR FLOOD FRINGE BOUNDARY I . soon) �� — — -= I ) � �� / loo o too 2W \ } i SCALE IN FEET r ( \ I� =r -- �— /ice —'VIII o DATE REVISION thereby certify that this plan, speailicolion, or rvport was OEM It --- ra 3 2 14 CITY REVIEW 1 prepared by me or wtler my direct supervision ontl Ihol- ---- - - - - -- HaLyy yy S,On AnJerS,On SHEET P 8 , 14 CITY REVIEW 2 -- am a duly Ll,.nssd Proof. sionol Engineer ontl., Ill. lows cJJ ,..__._.. El RV n Anderson FEMA FLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT r 7 2 14 CITE REVIEW Y3 of the Stn of Ni sofa ma F. - -' Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors WHITE PINE WILDERNESS 10 JAP 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 SECOND ADDITION of - RAID J. JOCHUM, P.E. aau, II: 763- 427 -5860 FAX 763- 427 -0520 t0 ww.hokonson- anderson.com CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA � z Date 2/6/1 Lic. No. 23461 CJJ www.hokonson-anderson.com - _ SHEETS 3931 -03