Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/11/2014;,W:l•�....�. 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda August 11, 2014 Andover City Hall Council Chambers 7.00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes — July 8, 2014 Regular Meeting 3. Public Hearing: Consider the Preliminary Plat of the Carson Ridge Planned Unit Development — 18 lot single family urban residential development located at 14123 Prairie Road NW — TH Construction. 4. Other Business 5. Adjournment A -741, 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes — July 8, 2014 DATE: August 11, 2014 RE UEST The Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to approve the minutes from the July 8, 2014 regularly scheduled meeting. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING — JULY 812014 The Regular Bi- Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Holthus on July 8, 2014, 7:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners present: Chairperson Holthus, Commissioners Timothy Cleven, Bert Koehler IV, Kyle Nemeth and Steve Peterson. Commissioners absent: Commissioners Dean Daninger and Lynae Gudmundson. Also present: Community Development Director Dave Carlberg City Planner Stephanie Hanson Others APPROVAL OF MINUTES. June 10, 2014 Motion by Commissioner Koehler, seconded by Commissioner Peterson, to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2- absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider rezoning 52 acres from RI — Single Family Rural to R4 —Single Family Urban located south of Crosstown Boulevard and Xeon Street NW — Tony Emmerich Construction. City Planner Hanson noted the purpose of this item is to hold a public hearing and take input on a request to rezone the parcels located directly south of Sophie's South and east of Winslow Hill's residential developments from R -1 Single Family Rural to R -4 Single Family Urban as requested by Tom Emmerich Construction. City Planner Hanson reviewed the proposed rezoning with the Commission. Motion by Commissioner Nemeth, seconded by Commissioner Cleven, to open the public hearing at 7:04 p.m. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2- absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —July 8, 2014 Page 2 Mr. Ron Smolik, 1295 148`h Lane NW, Andover, asked if there would be any water pumped out to put in City utilities similar to what had been done with the Sophie's South development. This had caused flooding initially and then the water table took several years to recover. He also expressed concerns about the removal of the mature trees and the quality of the homes that would be put into this development. Mr. John Derence, 15070 Yellow Pine Street NW, Andover, expressed concerns about the quality of homes that would go into the proposed developments because he feels anything that is less than $400,000 would be trashing the surrounding neighborhoods. He also expressed concerns about the lack of parkland being proposed and the lot configurations are not consistent with the neighborhood or straight along the back portion of the property. Community Development Director Carlberg stated the input that was received at the previous public hearing and tonight would be included in the staff reports for the plat and design reviews of this project. He clarified many of the concerns at this time will be discussed at a future public hearing and tonight the Commission is to recommend approval or denial of the rezoning the property. He also stated there would be more opportunities for public input during the preliminary plat reviews. Mr. Larry Olson, Tommy Emmerich Construction, 1875 Station Parkway, Andover, stated the family that currently owns the property determined the property that they would sell and this established the property lines for the four (4) parcels that would be considered Winslows Woods. He explained the homes would not be trashy or trash the surrounding neighborhoods and the lot sizes are designed to match the lot sizes in the surrounding area. Mr. Brent Jagers, 15069 Yellow Pine Street NW, Andover, expressed concerns about the value of the homes that would be in this development because the homes would not be able to be big based on the lot sizes. Commissioner Koehler clarified the objective of the Planning Commission at this time was to determine if rezoning the property would be in line with characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and the City's Comprehensive Plan. Community Development Director Carlberg also explained the value of the homes could not be dictated by the City and the proposed lots meet the requirements for the R -4 Zoning District. Mr. Smolik stated he is against lots this small because it would not allow a large enough home that would be of higher value. Chairperson Holthus stated the design of the homes, the landscaping plan, the irrigation, and other information would be looked at and discussed during the preliminary and final Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — July 8, 2014 Page 3 plat process. She also stated the Parks and Recreation Commission had discussed this development and there would be a park component to this development. Motion by Commissioner Koehler, seconded by Commissioner Cleven, to close the public hearing at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2- absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. Motion by Commissioner Peterson, seconded by Commissioner Koehler, to recommend to the City Council approval of rezoning the 52 acres located directly south of Sophie's South residential development from R -1 Single Family Rural to R -4 Single Family Urban as requested by Tony Emmerich Construction, based on the fact that the property is located within MUSA, water and sewer are available to the property, and the requested rezoning is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0- nays, 2- absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. City Planner Hanson stated that this item would be before the Council at the July 15, 2014 City Council meeting. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider a Preliminary Plat for a 4 -lot residential development known as Winslow Woods located on I50 Lane and Yellow Pine Street — Tony Emmerich Construction. City Planner Hanson noted the purpose of this item is to hold a public hearing and take input on the preliminary plat for Winslow Woods located on 150`h Lane and Yellow Pine Street and comprised of four urban lots and one outlot proposed by Tony Emmerich Construction. City Planner Hanson reviewed the proposed preliminary plat with the Commission. Commissioner Koehler asked how these lots compared in size to the surrounding lots. City Planner Hanson explained the proposed lots were at minimum 1/4 acre and the surrounding lots were somewhat larger. Chairperson Holthus asked if the City had any code requirements for landscaping. Community Development Director Carlberg explained they would need to put two (2) trees on each lot but there are no other requirements. Commissioner Peterson asked if there would be any impacts on the water table since the property was prepared to be hooked up to City services. City Planner Hanson stated there would not be any flooding impacts with this phase of the development. Utilities are already in place for these lots. When Phase 2 is done the City Engineer would review the project for potential impacts. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — July 8, 2014 Page 4 Motion by Commissioner Koehler, seconded by Commissioner Nemeth, to open the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2- absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. Mr. Derence stated the lots were too narrow to allow for an adequate sized home and he would like to see these lots wider and deeper. Mr. Smolik clarified the water table would not be lowered with this development. Community Development Director Carlberg stated this was correct for this development but it may be done with phase two (2) of the development. Mr. Olson clarified the lots exceed the minimum standard for the R -4 District and are about 1/3 -acre. The homes will be similar to those found in the surrounding neighborhoods and he explained the value of home is not based on the size. The builder will determine the price point for the homes. He also stated the rear property line had been determined by the seller not the developer. The builder will be developing the lots individually so that as many trees as possible are saved. Motion by Commissioner Nemeth, seconded by Commissioner Koehler, to close the public hearing at 7:52 p.m. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2- absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. Commissioner Koehler pointed out the lots to the north of this development are approximately 13,000 square feet and the proposed lots are 12,900 - square feet so they are similar to the surrounding area. Motion by Commissioner Koehler, seconded by Commissioner Nemeth, to recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat for Winslow Woods located on 1501h Lane and Yellow Pine Street comprised of four urban lots and one outlot proposed by Tony Emmerich Construction. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2- absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. City Planner Hanson stated that this item would be before the Council at the July 15, 2014 City Council meeting. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider Registered Land Survey —17605 & 17477 Hanson Boulevard NW —Max Fenna, Jr. Community Development Director Carlberg noted the purpose of this item is to hold a public hearing and take input on a Registered Land Survey (RLS) for properties located at 17605 and 17477 Hanson Boulevard NW as requested by Max Fenna Jr. Community Development Director Carlberg reviewed the proposed RLS with the Commission. I Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — July 8, 2014 Page 5 Motion by Commissioner Peterson, seconded by Commissioner Koehler, to open the public hearing at 7:57 p.m. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2- absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. There was no public input. Motion: by Commissioner Koehler, seconded by Commissioner Cleven, to close the public hearing at 7:58 p.m. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2- absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. Community Development Director Carlberg explained there is currently one (1) title certificate and in order to separate the two descriptions into two titles a registered land survey would have to be approved by the City. Motion by Commissioner Nemeth, seconded by Commissioner Peterson, to recommend to the City Council approval of a Registered Land Survey (RLS) for properties located at 17605 and 17477 Hanson Boulevard NW as requested by Max Fenna, Jr. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2- absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. Community Development Director Carlberg stated that this item would be before the Council at the July 15, 2014 City Council meeting. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider Registered Land Survey — 3200 South Coon Creek Drive — City of Andover. Community Development Director Carlberg noted the purpose of this item is to hold a public hearing and take input on a Registered Land Survey (RLS) proposed by the City for property located at 3200 South Coon Creek Drive. Community Development Director Carlberg reviewed the proposed RLS with the Commission. Commissioner Koehler asked if there was a developer interested in this property. Community Development Director Carlberg explained the City was currently working with a developer who is interested in acquiring the property. Commissioner Peterson asked how the location and size of the property for development had been determined. Community Development Director Carlberg stated this portion of the property (Tract A) was the highest and not wetland area. The remaining parcel is not buildable and would be reestablished as wetland. Chairperson Holthus asked if townhomes were considered for this area. Community Development Director Carlberg stated townhomes had been considered but market Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — July 8, 2014 Page 6 conditions dictate the construction of single family homes. The adjacent property owners were also supportive of single - family homes. Commissioner Peterson asked for clarification on what the passive trail for the property would be. Community Development Director Carlberg stated the main access would be an outlot to the west of the proposed homes and it would be a grass trail that goes along the perimeter. This trail is intended more for the neighborhood use but is also available for public use. This area will not be urbanized because it is intended to be a wetland restoration area. Motion by Commissioner Koehler, seconded by Commissioner Peterson, to open the public hearing at 8:09 p.m. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2- absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. Mr. Bill Hentges, 3061 142 "d Lane NW was concerned about this area being a wildlife corridor and asked the Planning Commission to establish setbacks from the creek to protect this area. Motion by Commissioner Koehler, seconded by Commissioner Peterson, to close the public hearing at 8:12 p.m. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2- absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. Community Development Director Carlberg explained approval of the registered land survey would create two (2) tracts of land and the development of what would be Tract A would go through the platting process and be developed into 5 -6 single family homes. During this process the setback and trail access would be reviewed. Motion by Commissioner Nemeth, seconded by Commissioner Koehler, to recommend to the City Council approval of a Registered Land Survey (RLS) for the property located at 3200 South Coon Creek Drive as proposed by the City. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0- nays, 2- absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. Community Development Director Carlberg stated that this item would be before the Council at the July 15, 2014 City Council meeting. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider an Amended Conditional Use Permit to Revise and approved Planned Unit Development known as Clocktower Commons —BDT Holdings, LLC and BDT Land, LLC. Community Development Director Carlberg noted the purpose of this item is to hold a public hearing and take input on a request by BDT Holdings, LLC and BDT Land, LLC, the current owners of the Andover Clocktower Commons, to amend the existing approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to revise the approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) on Lots 3 -5, Block 1, Andover Clocktower Commons. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — July 8, 2014 Page 7 Community Development Director Carlberg reviewed the proposed CUP amendments and PUD revisions with the Commission. Commissioner Cleven asked if there would be additional retention ponds constructed as part of this development. Community Development Director Carlberg stated that there would be additional ponding needed and the retention ponds would be reviewed as part of the commercial site plan review process. Commissioner Peterson asked for background on the clock tower. Community Development Director Carlberg explained the original design was for a stand -alone clock tower and landscape features on the corner and the developer is now requesting to incorporate the clock tower into the building and alternative landscaping along the corner that will incorporate the pond, a trail, and benches. Mr. Carlberg noted that at a March 25, 2014 worksession the City Council was supportive of these changes. Commissioner Peterson asked if there would be any changes to the trail along Crosstown Boulevard or Hanson Boulevard. Community Development Director Carlberg stated there was no intention to move the trail and the right -of -way was already established. Commissioner Peterson clarified the building along Crosstown Boulevard would be accessed from the parking lot and not the street. He asked to see a rendering of the building. Chairperson Holthus asked what the impacts would be if the building met all the setbacks. Community Development Director Carlberg explained this would impact the parking lot and the amount of parking would not meet the City's parking requirements. The availability of parking was a consideration when reducing the number of proposed buildings from three (3) to two (2). Chairperson Holthus asked who would be responsible for maintaining the southwest corner wetland area. Community Development Director Carlberg explained the landowners would continue to maintain this area along with any additional landscaping done for the project. Commissioner Peterson asked what changes were proposed for the drive -thru at The Bean. Community Development Director Carlberg explained the current drive -thru requires drivers to circle the entire building. The proposed changes would make this a more user friendly access and it would not affect delivery trucks or other traffic circulation in the parking lot. Motion by Commissioner Koehler, seconded by Commissioner Peterson, to open the public hearing at 8:34 p,m. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2- absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — July 8, 2014 Page 8 Mr. Darren Lazan, representing the Andover Clocktower Commons Development, provided the Planning Commission with an overview of the project and all proposed changes. He also stated the amended CUP should reflect the additional access point off Crosstown Boulevard that had been constructed. Mr. Tom Roberts, 11015 Bell Oaks Rd, Eden Prairie, explained the type of building that could be constructed on Lot 4 and that it could change based on the type of business going into the building. The corner of Lot 4 would be set up to look like a park with a trail that allows pedestrians and bikers to cut through without going to the intersection of Hanson and Crosstown. They would like to incorporate an electronic sign into the clock tower that would allow for advertising by the tenants so that they do not have to allow the roll away temporary signage. Commissioner Cleven asked if the back elevation of the building would be facing Crosstown Boulevard. Mr. Lazan stated the back elevation would contain glass emergency /fire access doors to enhance the look of the building and it would face Crosstown Boulevard. Commissioner Nemeth asked if the current structures would be refurbished to match the new buildings. Mr. Lazan explained they would be using the same color palate and materials to construct the new buildings but they would not be refurbishing the current structures. Commissioner Peterson asked why a drive -thru was being requested when they did not have a tenant identified for the building yet. Mr. Lazan explained they had a drive -thru approved for the other parcels and would like to have this option available when a tenant is identified. Commissioner Peterson stated the previous landscape plan had more trees and landscaping. He asked if there were other features that could be added to the current proposal. Mr. Lazan explained the original landscape plan included several trees that have since been removed because they were either diseased or damaged and they would not be able to add any features to the pond since it was an infiltration pond and considered a "dry" pond. Commissioner Koehler complimented the design. He asked if the developers had talked to the current tenants about the use of a digital sign versus a monument sign. Mr. Lazan stated they talked to the current tenants but felt this was a way for them to advertise their location and any specials they may have. Commissioner Peterson asked what the benefit would be for the City by approving these amendments. Mr. Lazan explained the landscaping features would improve the overall look of the corner, the trail would move pedestrian and bike traffic away from the corner and the development would build overall excitement to potential tenants to be in Andover. r Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —July 8, 2014 Page 9 Chairperson Holthus asked if the pond would be mowed since it was considered a "dry" pond and where the monument sign would be located. Mr. Lazan explained it would continue to be maintained and it would look similar to the pond owned by the City across the road and the monument sign would be located in front of the pond, closer to the corner. Motion by Commissioner Koehler, seconded by Commissioner Nemeth, to close the public hearing at 9:03 p.m. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2- absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. Commissioner Koehler asked why the setbacks were in the City Code. Community Development Director Carlberg stated this was to allow for landscape features and trail along the roadway in addition to creating separation from buildings and the roadway. Motion by Commissioner Koehler, seconded by Commissioner Nemeth, to recommend to the City Council approval of request by BDT Holdings, LLC and BDT Land, LLC, to amend the existing approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to revise the approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) on Lots 3 -5, Block 1, Andover Clocktower Commons. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2- absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. Community Development Director Carlberg stated that this item would be before the Council at the July 15, 2014 City Council meeting. OTHER BUSINESS. Community Development Director Carlberg stated the City Council had approved the variance request on Aztec Street for the 8 -foot fence as recommended by the Planning Commission at their June meeting. He asked the Planning Commission if they would like to change the August 12 meeting due to the primary election being held that day. They could either meet at 8:01 p.m. or change the night of the meeting to August 11 at 7:00 p.m. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to change the August 12, 2014 regular meeting to Monday, August 11, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. Commissioner Nemeth asked if there was anyone interested in the property on the corner of Bunker Lake Boulevard and Hanson Boulevard and also with the old "Tom Thumb" property up on 7`h Avenue. Community Development Director Carlberg stated there was interest in the property on Bunker Lake Boulevard and an agent was marketing the old "Tom Thumb" property. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — July 8, 2014 Page 10 Commissioner Cleven asked if the City would work with the developers at Clocktower Commons in regards to the trail being low and subject to standing water. Community Development Director Carlberg stated the trail was lower than the property in one area and the Developers would like the City to participate in raising this section. This is something the City would work through with the Developer. ADJOURNMENT. Motion by Commissioner Nemeth, seconded by Commissioner Cleven, to adjourn the meeting at 9:13 p.m. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2 - absent (Daninger, Gudmundson) vote. Respectfully Submitted, Tina Borg, Recording Secretary Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. *I r �9kI NDOVE^ 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Plat/Planned Unit Development (PUD) known as Carson Ridge, a single - family urban residential development located at14123 Prairie Road NW. DATE: August 11, 2014 INTRODUCTION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the preliminary plat/PUD for Carson Ridge. The plat contains 18 -urban lots as proposed by TH Construction of Anoka. DISCUSSION Conformance with Local and Regional Plans and Ordinances 1. The property is located within the 2020 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The Andover Comprehensive Plan allows for the parcels to develop into urban lots at a density of 1.75 to 3.6 single family homes per acre. A PUD allows a maximum density of 4 single family homes per acre. The density of the proposed plat is 1.80 single family homes per acre. 2. The property is zoned Single Family Rural Residential (R -1). A rezoning to Single Family Urban Residential (R -4) is required for the project to move forward. 3. The proposed project requires a PUD review to establish standards unique to this development. The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the proposed PUD based on City Code 13 -3, Planned Unit Development. Access Access will be provided from Ilex St NW as shown on the plat. If future development occurs to the north, the development will gain access to Prairie Rd NW. Utilities Trunk sewer and water lines are located south of the land within the Shadowbrook development and will be available to extend to this development. Floodplain and Wetlands A significant amount of floodplain exists along the eastern side of the property. The wetland delineation has been completed. The full report has been submitted as part of the preliminary plat. Coon Creek Watershed District (CCWD) The CCWD has reviewed and approved the grading plan, hydrology calculations and soils report. Coordination with other Agencies The developer and /or owner are responsible to obtain all necessary permits (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Coon Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, LGU and any other agency that may have an interest in the site). Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council Sketch Plan Review Meeting minutes are attached for your review from the November 12, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and the November 19, 2013 City Council meeting. Park and Recreation Commission The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the sketch plan at their November 7, 2013 meeting. The Commission recommended cash in lieu of land dedication. The Commission will also review the preliminary plat on August 21, 2014. Trail System A 20 foot trail easement has been identified at the western end of the 1415L Avenue NW cul -de- sac, between Lots 8 and 9, Block 1. This trail will link to the trail system along Prairie Road. The developer is responsible for the paving of the trail which will be installed along with the street and utility construction. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Review Applicable Ordinances City Code 13 -3 -9 regulates the findings that are required for a PUD to be approved: 1. The proposed development is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan of the City. 2. The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. 3. The proposed development demonstrates how each modified or waived requirement contributes to achieving the purpose of PUD. No. Item R -4 Standard P.U.D. Reason for Request 1 Min. Lot Width 80 feet 80 to 98 feet Conforms to R -4 width standards. 4 lots are 80 feet in width while 14 lots are 90+ feet in width. 2 Min. Lot Depth 130 feet 127 to 543 feet I 1 lots are 127 feet deep while 7 lots exceed the R -4 standards. 3 Min. Lot Area 11,400 sq /ft 11,405 to Conforms to R -4 lot area standards 41,598 s /ft 2 LOA 4 Front Setback 35 feet 30 feet The reduced front yard setback allows houses/garages closer to the street and increases the rear yard area since 11 lots are 127 feet in depth. Sufficient space is provided to ark at least two vehicles in each driveway. 5 Side Setback 10 feet 10 feet Conforms to R -4 setback standards. Garage Setback feet 6 feet Setback to 25 feet 25 feet street — corner lot 6 Rear Setback 30 feet 30 feet Conforms to R -4 setback standards. 7 Street Width 33 feet for 33 feet for Conforms to standard public street design public public 8 Cul De Sac 500 feet 598 feet Utilizes the land to its full development length potential while still providing convenient and safe access for vehicles and pedestrians City Code 13 -3 -11 identifies Desirable PUB Design Qualities that are sought in any PUD proposal as listed below. A. Achieves efficiency in the provision of streets and utilities and preserves area to achieve the elements of design qualities described in this Chapter. B. Provides convenient and safe access for vehicles and pedestrians and all types of activity that are anticipated to be a part of the proposed development. C. Provides a tree line buffer between backyards of back -to -back lots. D. Preserves existing stands of trees and /or significant trees and provides additional tree plantings. E. The proposed structures within the development demonstrate quality architectural design and the use of high quality building materials for unique design and detailing. Homes The two housing styles, ranch -style and two- story, and color - schemes are proposed as shown in the attached Building Elevations. The homes provide a substantial amount of stone on the front elevation as well as maintenance free siding, hardy board, vinyl shakes and columns at the entrances of each structure. The homes will also have a three stall attached garage. The home styles will minimize the distance from the front of the garage to the front of the home. 91 iij Tree Preservation Plan The attached Tree Plan illustrates trees to be preserved, tree removals and additional tree plantings. The developer is preserving as many existing trees possible to provide a buffer between neighboring properties and to provide a screening from Prairie Road. Tree removal will occur in grading/drainage areas, building pads and for the construction of streets and utilities. Additional tree plantings will occur on the two corners lots of Ilex Street and 141St Avenue and along the northern property boundary to provide additional screening from the rural property to the north. These plantings may not impede the intersection site triangle area within 15 feet from the intersecting street right of way lines. Staff Recommendation As part of the platting process, the property will need to be rezoned to R4- Single Family Urban. Typically a rezoning public hearing is held prior to the preliminary plat public hearing. In this instance, a public hearing notice was not published because of staff oversight. Therefore, staff recommends the Commission hold the public hearing for the preliminary plat/PUD request this evening and then table the item until the August 26, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. At the next meeting, it is recommended the public hearing be continued and then the Commission makes a recommendation to City Council. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to hold a public hearing to gather public input, review the proposed preliminary plat /PUD and table to request until the August 26, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Attachments Resolution Location Map November 12, 2013 Approved Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes November 19, 2013 Approved City Council Meeting Minutes 13 -3 -11 Desirable PUD Design Qualities Carson Ridge PUD Project Overview (Tree Preservation Plan and House Elevations) Preliminary Plat Plan Set R ly subm'tte , f t� Stephanie L. Hanson Cc: Tony Hennen, TH Construction of Anoka, 617 E. Main St, Anoka, MN 55303 2 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA I :i�:�i;E�) :i:�:/ A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF "CARSON RIDGE" LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: The south 313.30 feet of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota lying Easterly of the Easterly right of way line of Prairie Road. WHEREAS, the Andover Review Committee has reviewed the preliminary plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD); and WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing on said preliminary plat and PUD; and WHEREAS, as a result of such public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and determined that said request meets the criteria of City Code 13 Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council the approval of the preliminary plat/PUD, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approves the preliminary plat/PUD review of Carson Ridge, with the following conditions: 1. The Preliminary Plat shall conform to the plans stamped received on July 21, 2014. 2. Exhibit A shall regulate the lot dimensions and setbacks for the proposed development. 3. The development shall conform to City Code Titles 11, 12, and 13, as well as Exhibit A "Carson Ridge Design Standards ". Exhibit A shall regulate when in conflict with the City Code. 4. The developer obtains all necessary permits from the Coon Creek Watershed District, DNR, Corps of Engineers, LGU, MPCA, and any other agency that may be interested in the site. 5. Park dedication and trail fees must be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. Contingent upon staff review and approval for compliance with City ordinances, policies and guidelines. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 2nd day of September, 2014. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Michelle Hartner, Deputy City Clerk Michael R. Gamache, Mayor ATTACHMENT A Carson Ridge Planned Unit Development Approved Design Standards No. Item R -4 Standard P.U.D. Reason for Request 1 Min. Lot Width 80 feet 80 to 98 feet Conforms to R -4 width standards. 4 lots are 80 feet in width while 14 lots are 90+ feet in width. 2 Min. Lot Depth 130 feet 127 to 543 feet 11 lots are 127 feet deep while 7 lots exceed 5 Side Setback 10 feet 10 feet the Garage Setback 6 feet 6 feet R -4 standards. 3 Min. Lot Area 11,400 sq /ft 11,405 to Conforms to R -4 lot area standards street — corner 41,598 sq /ft 4 Front Setback 35 feet 30 feet The reduced front yard setback allows houses/garages closer to the street and increases the rear yard area since 11 lots are 127 feet in depth. Sufficient space is provided o park at least two vehicles in each driveway. 5 Side Setback 10 feet 10 feet Conforms to R -4 setback standards. Garage Setback 6 feet 6 feet Setback to 25 feet 25 feet street — corner lot 6 Rear Setback 30 feet 30 feet Conforms to R -4 setback standards. 7 Street Width 33 feet for 33 feet for Conforms to standard public street design public public 8 Cul De Sac 500 feet 598 feet Utilizes the land to its full development length potential while still providing convenient and safe access for vehicles and pedestrians b c� t 'r �� a f� -bW— �a Carson Ridge Location rc 1416% 1162 y... \9844,. 11135 t.. 1111 "J ilia ,.1W6 X996 X094 L . .... _ ,. .� ..... . 140] 8 I 742ND LN 14315 )F W ' i ', � �•. M�'9 C0c]NCREEK PARK \ \ \ 179 ^951\ Q , 7 971 Y �93 ,.. " D i)vE.n 1 -02ND d.. AVE It 42N p' I Ild3 1087 j,' —" la 958 1001 k, t 1115 j N t .,4.872. 14`03 t,r '\\.. ,jLN r f IOYH ' SW \ 13]90 896 13974 al5' S 0 0 13839 1 ln2 113903 jt 1'L3662, 0 4 s ? 851 921' 101.3821 P13911 " 33v t1362D :� 8iH `�. ' euy �9 .. 5NAOVNBR00KMST '9�0�f14363 r t 657.611 _1I ! Wl I 742ND LN 14315 )F W ' i kl B,t t" �\ � . 710 716 02k 669 O 2 f \ 179 731 70)4 683 6l,4GA7 016215 y 593 Q , 7 99 "1:„ 4 ,.. " D i)vE.n 1 -02ND d.. AVE It 42N p' I 932 ]Ot 686 iW4 63G 612 14212 O � \ 219 � 15 921 i 685 6G1. 637 613 W1 11191 t 14190 \ _..�. 1'01 '� t r. 1 /10) 141ST (N i i k S ]]AV 110 606 6C2 q3 y616v V 11117 "r.y ib17Q� 979 'k, A � 4320 ,.. Qi 17 'y 723 p9 6]5� I t IWA, a `� \ 414126 I4lSTAVE' - 11122 / 289 l\ .\ \219 la 71 '70t 676 191 PaE y f ' t 173 5114 515 '487'x^ 163 � ',14015 ` S� ]45 k]09 p 665 1 649 615 W Lt{ „ t ( X LN 299 '. 619`` I40TN I40TH W. j 570 e y ,.� 14033,-1- `1 i542 Sll 472 458 9 �, 213.,. 221 d 6223 12 it 1W30 3�i I 8 bra 16 „L �\ �1'1�139]1 �"� 23]� w, iIM 14021 N/q ^p N , AVE AV1 I407H, AVE ..... �. ` 11018.11029 ” - 11031 11028 - nne � � "70 �1W14 "�� ___!.___.^ t F'P.c.�Q• n ;512' 139911 enr`. 436 �0l, ^� v "'V y317i �3i 6u1 "244 `J ,181'` k: al5' S 0 0 13839 1 ln2 113903 jt 1'L3662, 445 ` 1 851 921' 101.3821 P13911 " 33v t1362D :� 8iH `�. ' euy �9 .. 5NAOVNBR00KMST "M,. ,433 9ARK ^ ....... b93G�" '� r" 138TH.. ! Wl BL , ! ��o 1 .� ' LC8 x1361 •_.,••.µ r` BUNKER LAKE 04FCMRM t ' BUNKER LAKE p' I .> 4@ n W Disclaimer: Maps and documents made available to the public by the City of Andover are not legally recorded maps or surveys and are not intended to be used as such. The maps and documents are created as part of the Geographic Information System (GIS) that compiles records, information, and data from various city, county, state and federal resources. Copyright © 2013 City of Andover, All Rights Reserved Printed 08/07/2014 ;vc ti; ]a9 22 c ONKER LAKE 13895 "�., `108 Lit 5 103 16^I Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — November 12, 2013 Page 5 PUBLIC HEARING: Consider a Sketch Plan for an eighteen (18) lot urban residential development located at 14123 Prairie Road Nli; as requested by TH Construction. City Planner Hanson noted the purpose of this item is to hold a public hearing and take input on a Sketch Plan for an eighteen (18) lot urban residential development located at 14123 Prairie Road NW, as requested by TH Construction. City Planner Hanson reviewed the proposed sketch plan with the Commission. Commissioner Holthus asked if the existing residence on Lot 1, Block 1 will stay. Ms. Hanson indicated it would. Commissioner Gudmundson asked north of the ghost plat, if this has been coordinated with this development. Ms. Hanson indicated it will not be as the Catcher's Creek project is north of Coon Creek.. Commissioner Peterson asked if Prairie Road will be reconstructed. Mr. Carlberg was not sure of the reconstruction schedule for Prairie Road but indicated there is no access plan for this development onto Prairie Road. Commissioner Holthus stated since Prairie Road is a collector street and State Aid road, does the State have any criteria as to how many side streets can have access to it. Mr. Carlberg stated they try to limit the number of accesses onto Prairie Road. Motion by Nemeth, seconded by Koehler, to open the public hearing at 7:57 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- present, 1- absent (Cleven) vote. Ms. Pixie Stockal, 601 140`i' Lane NW, stated her concern with this project is that all of the traffic will come onto 140"' Lane and she wondered if there was a way they could do something so there is one egress into that development from Prairie Road because there will be a lot of traffic and there are currently a lot of children there. Mr. Carlberg stated there is a ghost plat and future development will warrant a future access onto Prairie Road and 1401h does have capacity for additional traffic. Ms. Stockal asked if there was a way to slow the traffic down. Chairperson Daninger stated if there is an issue with speeding, the residents can contact the Sheriff's Department. Ms. Stockal wondered what will happen to the existing buildings on the property if this is developed. Mr. Carlberg indicated the applicant can address the question. Mr. Mark Madden, 14122 Prairie Road, stated he likes the sketch plan but his only concern is the fencing along Prairie Road. He thought the fences were atrocious and he Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —November 12, 2013 Page 6 wondered if there was a way to prevent fencing abutting major roadways. His concern will be with the new houses in this development will put up fencing that will look bad. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the City Ordinance with the Commission. He noted the problem is that there is no uniform fencing regulations so as long as the fence is maintained, any type of fence can be installed. He stated this has been a concern of the look of the community. Mx. Todd Wold, 463 1401h Lane, asked if the developer is connected with the original Shadowbrook development. He was concerned because of the covenants in the existing development and if they will continue into this development. Mr. Ed Gritton, 14157 Prairie Road, stated he lived next to this property and one of his concerns is they own some horses and with the lot lines butting up to his lot line, what is he to anticipate with future homeowners and his horses, what will he be faced with. He wondered how he will be protected. Mr. Carlberg stated they have ordinances regarding keeping horses that also covers the manure management responsibilities of the horse owners that Mr. Gritton would have to comply with. Mr. Griffon stated the concern is the additional cost he may have to incur with manure maintenance. Mr. Carlberg stated if there will be an area where manure will be stored on the property he suggested moving it to the north or east on the property. Mr-. Tony Hennen, 617 Main Street, Anoka, applicant, reviewed with the Commission the price point of homes he builds. Chairperson Daninger noted the covenants will be different than Shadowbrook because it is a different development. Commissioner Holthus asked if the existing home will remain, will it be reversed or what will happen. Mr. Hennen stated the house will stay as it is with the driveway coming off Prairie Road, it will be hooked up to City sewer and water, and the other buildings will be removed. Commissioner Peterson asked if the existing house is removed in the future and a new home is constructed, would there be enough frontage area off the cul -de -sac to build a new structure. Mr. Carlberg indicated there would be enough frontage on that site to build a new home. Commissioner Gudmundson asked if there will be covenants or restrictions on the development. Mr. Hennen indicated there will be covenants put in place but it will not be a continuation of the Shadowbrook development. Chairperson Daninger asked if a fence will be placed on the existing home facing Prairie Road. Mr. Hennen indicated that will be the front of the home so a tall fence cannot be placed along Prairie Road. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes— November 12, 2013 Page 7 Mr. Madden asked how they can address the fence situation along Prairie Road. Chairperson Daninger indicated this issue was seen City wide but thought Mr. Madden may want to meet with City staff to discuss it further. Mr. Carlberg suggested going before the City Council and discuss it during resident forum or to call or email the Council. Mr. Jerry Stockel, 601 140'h Lane, asked if they will be notified by mail for the next meeting. Mr. Carlberg stated this will go before the City Council on November 19a' but future meetings will have public notifications. Mr. Wold wondered how quickly the developer plans on moving forward with this project. Chairperson Daninger thought the applicant would want to start as soon as this project is approved. The applicant agreed. Motion by Holthus, seconded by Nemeth, to close the public hearing at 8:23 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- present, 1- absent (Cleven) vote. Chairperson Daninger did not think there was a big issue with the size of the development, but there was a little bit of an issue with traffic. Commissioner Gudmundson thought the development looked nice and wondered if there could be beaming on Lot 9 along Prairie Road so a fence may not be needed. City Planner Hanson stated this item would be before the Council at the November 19, 2013 City Council meeting. PUBLIC NG: ConsiderAniendrnents to the City Code 12 -2 -2, Definitions; 12- 12, Permitted, 6nditional and Prohibited Uses and 12 -14, Enforcement. \ Community Development Diteetor Carlberg noted the purpose of this item is to hold a public hearing and take input on, endments to the City Code 12 -2 -2, Definitions; 12- 12, Permitted, Conditional and Prohibited Uses and 12 -14, Administration and Enforcement. Community Development Director Carlberg ievi\ the proposed amendments with the Commission. Motion by Koehler, seconded by Nemeth, to open the pAN'hearing at 8:33 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- present, 1- absent (Cleve>wote. There was no public input. Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes —November 19, 2013 Page 4 Motion by Knight, Seconded by Howard, to approve the Conditional Use Permit for telecommunications collocation on water tower #1 and the construction of a shelter located in Rose Park, 14057 Rose Street NW. Motion carried unanimously. (See Resolution R106 -13) Mr. Carlberg indicated that staff will work with the applicant on Councilmember Howard's concerns. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW — 18 LOT SINGLE FAMILY URBAN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT —14123 PRAIRIE ROAD NW— TH CONSTRUCTION Mr. Carlberg stated the City Council is asked to review a residential sketch plan for an 18 -lot single family urban residential development as requested by Mr. Tony Hennen of TH Construction. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the staff report with the Council. Mayor Gamache asked if Plan B would place the homes closer to the front of the lot and not the back. Mr. Carlberg stated the standard 35 foot front yard setback could be maintained with this plan. They would be losing three feet off the back of the yard. Mayor Gamache stated the back yards will be backing up to another back yard and because it is only three feet, he wondered if it is better to move the house forward three feet because the entire neighborhood will be that way rather than shortening the back yard. Councilmember Trude stated that would require a PUD because it is a lot of variances. She did not know if they wanted to lower the community standard that much. Councilmember Trude thought the sketch plan is trying to get too much into a little amount of land. She wondered if this developer could try to purchase land from adjacent property owners. Mr. Carlberg stated the developer has met with the adjoining property owner and they have not come to an agreement for purchase. Mr. Carlberg stated there are a couple of options to be looked at. One is to grant variances, another is to look at doing a PUD with options of landscaping or berming and enhanced design standards. The City Council and staff reviewed options for the sketch plan to see what could possibly be done to improve the development without granting variances. Mayor Gamache asked if it requires this development to be a PUD because of the variances. Mr. Carlberg indicated it did not, the lots can be granted a depth of a three -foot variance in the back yard and when they come to preluninary plat, the lots will be listed with a three -foot variance. These are buildable lots but they are not able to gain the necessary property to meet the minimum lot depth requirements. Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes —November 19, 2013 Page 5 Councilmember Trude thought it was an economic reason and stated this could be a development that met all of the City's requirements if it were not for the eight additional lots. Mr. Carlberg stated the Council could require this to be a PUD and ask the developer for berming or landscaping as a part of it. Councilmember Trude thought by doing a PUD, a precedent would not be set. She stated three feet could be quite a difference in a backyard when they abut homes. She thought this was imposing a lot on the existing neighborhood. Councilmember Howard stated he would be comfortable with the developer doing this if Lots 8 and 9 were shifted a little bit to give the lots more than the required buildable space because then they get something for letting the lots be little bit shorter. He indicated he is still comfortable with the project. Councilmember Howard thought the lots lines could be pushed to the west to allow more space for the internal lots. Councilmember Knight wondered if Lots 10 -14 were elongated east to west would that help. Mayor Gamache thought that would take care of just one side of the road. Mr. Carlberg noted the only thing that could be done would be to shift the road and either make one side comply and the other side a greater deviation or variance. But, bigger lots cannot be created by pushing them east or west, the problem is with north and south. Councilmember Howard stated there is the opportunity to go wider with the house rather than deeper. Mr. Carlberg agreed but noted it would not meet the lot depth minimum. He explained the lots need depth because they do not meet the 130 feet. They meet the buildability requirements, the width and the area because they went a little wider to make up for the deviation in depth; the only deviation is the three -foot depth. Councilmember Trude thought seventy-five percent of the lots need some kind of a variance and there should be some amenity or something similar to a PUD. Otherwise, the City standards will mean nothing and she is concerned about that. Mayor Gamache stated he would be fine with the front being moved forward because they have always pushed the front yards back more than other cities. He thought in order to make it fit the neighborhood behind this development, they need to make the back yard the proper size. Mr. Carlberg thought it sounded like a PUD was the right way to go to make this fit into the neighborhood but the question would be, what is the benefit to the City by allowing the deviation or new standard. Councilmember Trude thought this needed to go PUD because if the requirements for a variance were looked at they could not justify that it was not economic. She thought Mayor Gamache had some points that would be acceptable to people who five in the area and increasing the density of plantings would make it match some of the neighboring properties. In addition, maybe they look at the fence issue that was brought up at the Planning Commission meeting. She is also Regular Andover City Council Meeting Minutes— November 19, 2013 Page 6 concerned with the trail connection taking out a lot of trees. She thought this should go back to the drawing board. Councilmember Knight agreed. Councilmember Howard indicated this should likely be a PUD with some amenities given to the City. Mayor Gamache stated there was discussion about a trail that runs along the creek. Councilmember Trude stated the trail makes a nice walking loop for people in the area and she would hate to see trees lost because of the trail but thought the developer could come back with a PUD with additional plantings and preserve the space in the back yard with the existing homes. Mr. Hennen indicated he would review his options based on the Council input. NAMING OF 40 ACRE SPORTS COMPLEX/3535 —161sT AVENUE NfK /12 -31 Mr. BBrkowitz stated the City Council is requested to approve the naming of the 40 Acre Sports Mr. Berkowitz'xeviewed the staff report with the Council. Mayor Gamache tho ht one of the things they lack in the City is a tie to the history of the City. He thought it was impo ant they begin to look at this. He stated the land was previously owned by Mr. Royce Bennett and . ey should seriously think about tying back to some of the people that started this City when it was 0 ow Township, going back and bringing some of those names into the places now being used. Councilmember Tiede stated she liked'the Park Commission's idea of using the name of the family that owned the land on the trail thr6 gh the woods or one of the fields but when it comes down to it, it is hard to find where the field `s She thought the idea of the suggested name "Pine Hills North" was a good name. Councilmember Knight stated he liked the name "Veteran's Memorial." Councilmember Trude thought there were plans to put a park on Veterans Memo ial Boulevard. Councilmember Howard liked tying back to tradition. \ The City Council felt this item should be discussed when al\the, ci lmembers are at the meeting. Mx. Dickinson indicated staff would bring the topic back at the second co cil meeting in January. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT City Staff updated the Council on the administration and city department activities, legislative 13 -3 -10: REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS: Administrative approval of incidental changes in the PUD may be authorized by the City Planner upon review and approval by ARC. Such administrative approvals shall not substantially alter the character of the approved PUD and shall be limited to landscaping (not including quantity reduction), color schemes (not including materials), association documents, fencing, entrance monuments and decks. Changes in uses or development/design standards must be submitted for a full public hearing review process. (Amended Ord. 314, 10 -4 -2005) 13 -3 -11: DESIRABLE PUD DESIGN QUALITIES: The following design qualities will be sought in any PUD: A. Achieves efficiency in the provision of streets and utilities and preserves area to achieve the elements of design qualities described in this chapter. B. Provides convenient and safe access for vehicles and pedestrians and all types of activity that are anticipated to be a part of the proposed development. C. Provides a buffer between different uses, adjacent properties, roadways, between backyards of back -to -back lots. D. Preserves existing stands of trees and /or significant trees. E. Provides considerable landscaping treatments that complement the overall design and contribute toward an overall landscaping theme. F. Preserves significant usable space on individual lots or through the provision of open space within the development. G. Provides an attractive streetscape through the use of undulating topography, landscaping, decorative street lighting, decorative mailbox groupings, retaining walls, boulders, fencing, area identification signs, etc. H. The proposed structures within the development demonstrate quality architectural design and the use of high quality building materials for unique design and detailing. The lasting quality of the development will be ensured by design, maintenance and use guidelines established through an owners' association. (Ord. 298, 8 -4 -2004) 13 -3 -12: APPROVAL OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: The developer must demonstrate that the amenities and qualities of the Planned Unit REZONE REQUEST FROM R -1 SINGLE FAMILY RURAL TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CARSON RIDGE JUNE 20, 2014 SUBMITTED BY TH CONSTRUCTION OF ANOKA, INC. C/O TONY HENNEN 617 EAST MAIN STREET ANOKA, MN 55303 763 - 422 -8809 DESIGNER/SURVEYOR HAKANSON ANDERSON, INC. 3601 THURSTON AVENUE ANOKA, MN 55303 763 - 427 -5860 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. PROJECT OVERVIEW .......................................................... ............................... 1 B. PURPOSE AND INTENT ....................................................... ............................... 1 C. SITE CONDITIONS AND LOCATION .................................. ..............................1 D. ZONING .................................................................................. ............................... 1 E. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ........................................... ............................... 1 F. LANDSCAPING ..................................................................... ............................... 2 G. HOME DESIGN STANDARDS ............................................. ............................... 2 TC -1 A. PROJECT OVERVIEW The site is an existing property being used as a rural residence. This residential property was created by the subdivision of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25 many years ago. The property should be properly platted and this plan is for an urban residential development. The PUD (Planned Unit Development) is a tool to ensure that the best use of the property will occur and public interest will be benefitted. B. PURPOSE AND INTENT The land use plan for the property was prepared with the following objectives: • To promote an aesthetically pleasing residential development with consideration given to building materials, vegetation, and site layout. • To create a pedestrian bike connection to the Prairie Road trail from the development. • To avoid as much as possible any negative impact to the existing residential area. • To preserve the existing wetlands and trees on the property and conform as much as possible to existing development standards. C. SITE CONDITION AND LOCATION The property borders Prairie Road on the west, the residential subdivision of Shadowbrook on the south, a rural home site to the north and wetlands /Coon Creek to the east. It is the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Twp. 32, R25. It contains an existing home on outbuildings along Prairie Road. The existing home will remain and the outbuilding will be removed. Vehicle Access to the newly developed lots will be from Ilex Street NW, which was stubbed in along with sewer and water connections for this project during the Shadow Brook development. Vehicles will come into the site from Prairie Road by turning off on Juniper Street, and taking 140`h Lane NW to Ilex Street NW. D. ZONING The property is currently zoned as R- 1Single Family Rural. Property to the south and west is zoned as R4 — Single Family Urban and to the north is R -1, Single Family Rural. The proposed zoning is R -4 Single Family Urban/PUD. E. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The setbacks and standards proposed are the same as the R4 District except the front yard setback will be 30 feet instead of 35 feet. The corner Lot street setback will be 25 feet instead of 35 feet also. The home styles will be such to minimize the distance from the front of the garage to the fi•ont of the home. This will increase the distance from the real lot line to the rear of the home. The street was built so that lots abutting Prairie Road would be served and connected to 141St Avenue NW backing now or in the future to Prairie Road. F. LANDSCAPING The wooded areas on the west side of the project around the existing home, the south line of the property and wherever possible will be preserved. Trees will be planted as per species and location per the attached Attachment A. G. HOME DESIGN STANDARDS The homes built in this development will be enhanced architecturally to provide an aesthetically pleasing environment for its residents. Attached B includes samples of home styles, facade and colors typical for those to be built. Page 2 il�8 b, Tree Pre! s s qj gill Biel I allWilli 11 / n i g3 �E � TRFC PROTECTION WOODLOi DELINEATION \ TREE PROTECTION �%�6' IN 6' MIN DELIMEAINNF 1. STANDARD AS' HIGH SNOW FENCE OR OflAHCE SAlF1Y TREE PROTECTION FENCE OELIN[ATIOH 2. CAUTION RIBBON A" WIDE MAY BE USED AS PASSVE TREE PROTECTION OR APPROVED EDUU- PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION MAY ONLY BE UDUZED TO DELINEATE TREE SAVE AREAS WHKH ARE REMOTE FROM am OF UJJD DISTURBANCE. 3. S1EEL POSTS AS NEEDED. A. DELINE WIN OF TREE UNE PROTECTION SHALL EXTEND CONTINUOUSLY TROUGH PROTECTOR AREAS. TOTALLY SURNOUND INDIVIDUAL SPECIMENS AS NOTED. OR CXFEKO ACROSS THE FACE AND THE ENDS SHALL EXTEND 6' BACK FOR INDIVIDUAL TREE UNE PROTECTION. 15- A' TREE SAVE Iy MIN, T AREA 1. SIGN TO BE P E IOO' O.C. ALONG FENCE THRU WOODED LOT AREA. ON INDIVIDUAL SPECIMENS WHERE NOTED, AND ONE ON EACH TREE UNE AREA TO BE SAVED. SIGNS TO BE AFFIXED TO STEEL POSTS. 1. AU PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION MUST W ACCOMPANIED BY "KEEP OUT*' OR 'TREE SAVE ABU" SIGNAM. TYPICAL UGEHM TREE SAVE AREA WETLAND OPEN SPACE TREE PROTECTION OEUNGFvW QI NEW TREE PLANTING PER fy CITY REQUIREMENTS TREE REMOVAL AREA II DEUHEATIGN OF TREE LINE PROTECTION SKULL IDEALLY BE LDCATED AT THE OUTER PERIMETER Of THE DRIPUNE. TREELINE wpm FVATION VIEW No SCALE TRFC PROTECTION WOODLOi DELINEATION \ TREE PROTECTION �%�6' IN 6' MIN DELIMEAINNF 1. STANDARD AS' HIGH SNOW FENCE OR OflAHCE SAlF1Y TREE PROTECTION FENCE OELIN[ATIOH 2. CAUTION RIBBON A" WIDE MAY BE USED AS PASSVE TREE PROTECTION OR APPROVED EDUU- PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION MAY ONLY BE UDUZED TO DELINEATE TREE SAVE AREAS WHKH ARE REMOTE FROM am OF UJJD DISTURBANCE. 3. S1EEL POSTS AS NEEDED. A. DELINE WIN OF TREE UNE PROTECTION SHALL EXTEND CONTINUOUSLY TROUGH PROTECTOR AREAS. TOTALLY SURNOUND INDIVIDUAL SPECIMENS AS NOTED. OR CXFEKO ACROSS THE FACE AND THE ENDS SHALL EXTEND 6' BACK FOR INDIVIDUAL TREE UNE PROTECTION. 15- A' TREE SAVE Iy MIN, T AREA 1. SIGN TO BE P E IOO' O.C. ALONG FENCE THRU WOODED LOT AREA. ON INDIVIDUAL SPECIMENS WHERE NOTED, AND ONE ON EACH TREE UNE AREA TO BE SAVED. SIGNS TO BE AFFIXED TO STEEL POSTS. 1. AU PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION MUST W ACCOMPANIED BY "KEEP OUT*' OR 'TREE SAVE ABU" SIGNAM. TYPICAL UGEHM TREE SAVE AREA WETLAND OPEN SPACE TREES TO BE REMOVED T IN Y,I[ IN iFM GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL TREES SHOWN SHALL BE PROTECTED. 2. NO STORAGE Of MATERIALS. OPERATION OF MACHINERY. OR OEVELOPMENT Of ANY SORT COIL OCCUR WITHIN THE WOOMAHD SIDE OF PROTECTIVE DEUNEATION WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. 3. ERECT PROTECTIVE DEUMEATON CONTINUOUSLY ALONG NIP LINE OF SIMIICANT TREES CLOSEST W STREET RIGHTS -OF- WAY. FINAL L TION OT OELN 71011 SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BT ENGINEER IN THE FIELD. SECURE OCUNEATION TO METAL POSTS AT A HEIGHT OF A FEET. A. GRMMNG SHALL COMMENCE ONLY AFTER PROTECOW MEASURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND ALL CONTRACTORS NAVE BEEN BRIEFED ON PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES. B. NO TRENCH FOR UNDERGROUND UIIUDES SHALL BE PERMITTED ON THE WOODLAND SIDE OF PROTECTIVE MUNEATIOX. 6. U PRUNING n NECESSARY. PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSWNALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON FOR SPECIES. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS OF THEE REPLACEMENT RESULTING FROM DAMAGE TO TREES WITHIN PROTECTED AREAS. 6. C" MCT(IN SHALL BE NESPONSIBIS FOR NNMTNMING PROTECTIVE DEUMEATNIN AND SIGNS IN GOOD REPAIR THROUGHOUT DURATION OF PROJECT. S. ALL uITUMS IHSTML D AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL IE WITHIN STREET RIGHTS -OF -WAY OR UTILRY CASEMENTS. 10. CONTACT THE CITY FORESTER (ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT) AT 755 -51M TO ARRANGE A PRECONSTRUCTgN CONFERENCE RAW THE CTY FORESTEItIMEE INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ANY U O DMURBANCE. 11. A4 TREE PROTECTION Mm%ARES SHALL BE MSTAUED PMOR TO BUILMNG CONSTRUCTION. ti ORANGE POLY SAFETY FENCE OR ORANGE SILT FENCE SHALL BE LOCATEO AT THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE ORIPUNE OR AS MRECTED BY CITY FORESTER. REFERENCE HOTES: QI ALL OTHER TREE PROTECTON SHALL BE PASSIVE. 3e DAT aEVISI ®B° ..ER R G OVERALL TREE PUN deon Ok0ns An rs CARSON RIDGE cn E.&. . we sMw L « a q SIN 36o1 rWN`w I Aw.. ANN1a. MG - BB303 PUD ATTACHMENT A 63 t ;} 7-.27 -5660 65 FAX )-A27 -0520 .E °A° .WW.IwkRw.on- R.6AnP�.Ran CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA BRADY, cllc _ TREE PROTECTION OEUNGFvW QI NEW TREE PLANTING PER CITY REQUIREMENTS TREE REMOVAL AREA TREES TO BE REMOVED T IN Y,I[ IN iFM GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL TREES SHOWN SHALL BE PROTECTED. 2. NO STORAGE Of MATERIALS. OPERATION OF MACHINERY. OR OEVELOPMENT Of ANY SORT COIL OCCUR WITHIN THE WOOMAHD SIDE OF PROTECTIVE DEUNEATION WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. 3. ERECT PROTECTIVE DEUMEATON CONTINUOUSLY ALONG NIP LINE OF SIMIICANT TREES CLOSEST W STREET RIGHTS -OF- WAY. FINAL L TION OT OELN 71011 SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BT ENGINEER IN THE FIELD. SECURE OCUNEATION TO METAL POSTS AT A HEIGHT OF A FEET. A. GRMMNG SHALL COMMENCE ONLY AFTER PROTECOW MEASURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND ALL CONTRACTORS NAVE BEEN BRIEFED ON PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES. B. NO TRENCH FOR UNDERGROUND UIIUDES SHALL BE PERMITTED ON THE WOODLAND SIDE OF PROTECTIVE MUNEATIOX. 6. U PRUNING n NECESSARY. PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSWNALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON FOR SPECIES. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS OF THEE REPLACEMENT RESULTING FROM DAMAGE TO TREES WITHIN PROTECTED AREAS. 6. C" MCT(IN SHALL BE NESPONSIBIS FOR NNMTNMING PROTECTIVE DEUMEATNIN AND SIGNS IN GOOD REPAIR THROUGHOUT DURATION OF PROJECT. S. ALL uITUMS IHSTML D AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL IE WITHIN STREET RIGHTS -OF -WAY OR UTILRY CASEMENTS. 10. CONTACT THE CITY FORESTER (ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT) AT 755 -51M TO ARRANGE A PRECONSTRUCTgN CONFERENCE RAW THE CTY FORESTEItIMEE INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ANY U O DMURBANCE. 11. A4 TREE PROTECTION Mm%ARES SHALL BE MSTAUED PMOR TO BUILMNG CONSTRUCTION. ti ORANGE POLY SAFETY FENCE OR ORANGE SILT FENCE SHALL BE LOCATEO AT THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE ORIPUNE OR AS MRECTED BY CITY FORESTER. REFERENCE HOTES: QI ALL OTHER TREE PROTECTON SHALL BE PASSIVE. 3e DAT aEVISI ®B° ..ER R G OVERALL TREE PUN deon Ok0ns An rs CARSON RIDGE cn E.&. . we sMw L « a q SIN 36o1 rWN`w I Aw.. ANN1a. MG - BB303 PUD ATTACHMENT A 63 t ;} 7-.27 -5660 65 FAX )-A27 -0520 .E °A° .WW.IwkRw.on- R.6AnP�.Ran CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA BRADY, cllc _ ATTACHMENT A 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV City of Andover Tree Planting Recommendations r r { y ?, - 5.r Hardwoods ernes b[snctMa PMWY brrtk� wsr ro seeM fYbi, rsNfb twm*Mr9 1. red maple (Acer rubrum) 23. butternut (Juglans cinerea) 2. silver maple (Acer saccharinum) 24. black willow (Salix nigra) 3. sugar maple (Acer saccharum) 25. ironwood or eastern hornbeam 4. bittemut hickory (Carya cordiformis) herrrove U0,41 Wn ba*ket (Ostrya virginiana) 5. paper birch (Betula papyrifera) 26. showy mountain ash (Sorbus decora) 6. yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis) 27. serviceberry (Amelanchier spp.) 7. river birch (Betula nigra) 28. blue beech (Carpinus caroliniana) 8. northern pin oak (Quercus ellipsoidalis) 9. northern red oak (Quercus rubra) 10. bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa) Softwoods 11. eastern white oak (Quercus alba) 1. eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) 12. American elm (Ulmus americana) 2. red pine (Pinus resinosa) 13. rock elm (Ulmus thomasii) 3. jack pine (Pinus banksiana) 14. slippery elm (Ulmus rubra) 4. white spruce (Picea g(auca) 15. quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) 5 black spruce (Picea mariana) 16. bigtooth aspen (Populus grandidentata) 6. tamarack (Larix laricina) 17. balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera) 7. northern white cedar (Thuja 18. American basswood (Tilia americana) occidentalis) 19. hackberry (Celtis occidentalis) 8. balsam fir (Abies balsamea) 20. black cherry (Prunus serotina) 21. choke cherry (Prunus virginiana) 22. pin cherry (Prunus pensylvanica) 23. American plum (Prunus americana) anew w adws - O '�- Qo nor peons b o .`� Mader a brarrh llpa r r { y ?, - 5.r 1, WRO boom sD0 ernes b[snctMa PMWY brrtk� wsr ro seeM fYbi, rsNfb twm*Mr9 r - . ' 00wh go 00 NOT $Oka W vamp A.a. for .rsYr da&abp& 1EUhk 1 Mr>wva Lgs ar+d sahae -T Prune broken brpcM **AbO dtlr ft ep ' sy� �ny-Y MA wwft Ptunornedwn Cut a'r+aV of b Ic4K '^� _ �3 �Vr &� t� �rsM& herrrove U0,41 Wn ba*ket us orratle eyr r r { y ?, - 5.r 1, WRO boom sD0 40� e w 4M den otW ac" noro pat -- - "- �'- -� PMWY brrtk� wsr ro seeM fYbi, rsNfb twm*Mr9 r - . ' - y A.a. for .rsYr da&abp& A!{aCVa �M��M enO CiC -.�R , �1oft~ w tPS .,.�.Y tl+ "am 1�yij Y'�..Y yep u vow4N fi*kNFaun taEw MN aw P - do MC4 **AbO dtlr ft ep ' sy� �ny-Y MA wwft _ _ r { i low In tea. 1 r BIG . iml F i M L .. rpf YM FOR SALE T �,- �� -��x � y... �t j�l� i r ��. � k: -,� .. I G ,.I I (a j a g°`,lt�,Fsi 1 - "ff .� `'!', �' � 4 •rte � � S .l` •e o. i 9 S,1 . i t \�A. a• ate% e 1 1 La tx k t t 1 jl y :Try a t. lop, r- t \�A. a• ate% e 1 5. �a. `K x, LN r �r• t ,y y. t f f � L '.Im" �K 5. �a. `K x, LN r �r• t ,y y. t f f � L '.Im" 1 �F-PlliI� r _ � r w. •: I. - ].:�-. •,s � :��'r.�' ICI qP- a�yr�r�/ �'• .. ,aryl :vlOic., •...... � PA49 *".7 S per ' � �' ®ice +? f � � 'r •� _ i. 4 1 =Tik ;n N � \>-4 - - - -, J------ yam- - =;- -- � �-;��. X-' - -// `� � W 0 b 130 �7' SCALE IN FEET Nla'9TV MAP I I , I L I Iq� 5- M R eoseen T cA nS �� x \ \\ urt rD nYYla K A s m Om l( ,E SEC 25 TOIMISHIP J2, RANGE 24. m wr tM[ =Tik ;n N � \>-4 - - - -, J------ yam- - =;- -- � �-;��. X-' - -// `� � W 0 b 130 �7' SCALE IN FEET wwRlT Note, I (T - / \ AKW. IINL Y IA1WU A N9MIY Li , MIf]�LnO6 �) (II III III ^LJCJIFI )f Ivl v �I �_� / ` \I \ \ / �\\ / \ r#:RIPnoN OF iPFRTr 1 I \•. -- >•>- -- DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR - I j / / I { , The Swth 113.31) feet of the South west Q.,W of SecUan 23, Tamehlp M Ranys 24, Anoka 11�\ III III l 111 ( l r7 1I / \ 4 = DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT County,, Minnesota. I)by Easterly of the Easterly right of say One of Prairie Road. O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET AND � _ MARKED WITH LICENSE NO. I8420 DENOTES HYDRANT x01 DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE I. The P'VhW -al ee.Mer ha meth w elwtgetlm or hdsp.ndert >wra, b w. ents of read. �\ �- t/ - DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL wumbmM, ,MMMH.. w.wmM, a.nWab me.. ono,, w anY ath- foaM that on eca+oto and arrant W4 F �-�J L _ -- - ic_ --_� L -_ -_J \�\ %� -�\ �.� ...- DENOTES UTILITY POLE search.., dl.daee t l - DENOTES GUY WIRE DENOTES EXISTING BURIED TELEPHONE x vaiwaw e9 M nre>d h Ih. ,pPn of M. ubdf b. Depth of Wk Cul -d.-S Lw9th. and Front 1 \ �' I----- - - - --T DENOTES EXISTING BURIED GAS Lbeahe) I DENOTES EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC DENOTES WATER LINE 1 yEMA Flaad iww m when the PebvetM fiam iTMA iYal Path x)aee9 mle B aatN DENOTES SANITARY SEWER ENE AdY 14 1911 - -_- __Ill_ -i (y/ \ \ / \ / -0 -- DENOTES STORM SEWER LINE / -EE•\ -^4 �1__ / 11 ! -'-�;I ITT 1i \4 \ \� / (� �\ -W-. DENOTES DELINEATED WETLAND 4Uoth"RMMww and feag. to Rwnm. Ed.LLly dldNg w Lot) to be rwlawd. - -i L_� T- / / / /�/ / / I 1 V \ -� �-- = DENOTES SIGN \ ,I rT - --I ./ I 1 \ \ \ I -Y 4. Trol and Mahtwwp Vield. Easwlwts to N awtN by agsat. h>b,oaoo . V�Ylln IT 11_x` -_'- ter/ / /' / / ) 1 ./ \ \\ © =DENOTES SML BORING (BY OTHERS) v�' N // kJ'fiV =DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE (DIAMETER) S No mwumwt Mpl Domed b DdF arv.lapmnt / r \I I \\ - 1 / //t / \( I 1 / �/, `\ �, �� /' - -- 41- DENOTES CONIFEROUS TREE (SPREAD) e. Owdunwh -Tan Nut Hydrant N Northeast ycNwt of FlMnaatlw of 140th Lane NW and TIM 3l Nan, /I / "� / /// �'� - -� , / \ `_, /� ` \\ \\ T - DENOTES G OF WOODS Oawtbn.wT.35 (NA'A 191E) -DEN EDGE _% L �_«_� L -_- / , /,'/ / ��— -a._/ � � - � - a DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK ENE T. ON* T y J3 1 - s , / _ - -_ ,9a4�nY feat tNed b Nrtwwn Mdrvl A>aadeta tx 011 edlarnl paawtY taPwrephY by Nn4E0 1rl / _ _ - DENOTES EXISTING EASEMENT LINE UOAp Mappbg (Z feet aemm�r>). 11I r =DENOTES EXISTING PARCEL LINES ,'- \ \ ��`\ / %� 1 \ I / / / 6 5th hwha• d4pkt4d by Nmth4m TMnalopi4a "' �) �. ^' •� Jy.,, - \1° 9. Mweay aaee..w b Lot• I we 14. Blodr 1 mu.l Mat Imt 10 fool hem the Inlwwagm of 141.t A.. NW and l.. Saw NW. '__- _17y\- III /`_ III/ /__ / /� T ?`..�� •\ \ � � \ 1 \ ��� �, �� - _ -�� -� \ l `��___ _ v i 1 I ✓ 7 / ^1 / /�/ 1 I ,r \ �� I ME R,� I I I EhII 1 -Dr. RS. el I / I / i i\ aaR>� x4-D+ 9 Ed.ard �.pemn ante. dwa _mom Imo of ty.-Swlh 311m f 01_N• \ \\ ran /4 o1 � 23 T.3Z R.2. \� < . �� �i J ( j/ ��_, �\ ����,.�_ - - i�__'' __r•`��___ _ ��` I N0936'SS'E��` / / / 04s dos A Pa i>,y_ \ \ l -y10f ONO Iplof, Z� ll INpM Mwlh \ \ r I r r / i /!r ,>>1 IJ4 I i III I I i e, �/1. uadiM -- I I -"� II I I TYPICAL LOT 207E R\- wrlm Dt7111 �.rt. Icw aeANAZ U1utr £� M R eoseen T ET9ACr Y \ \\ urt rD nYYla K A s m Om l( N Wm M m r W lC e n .YAe' 9r O !119e Ar sro Anic U - 1L E rte AT e/e ue Y rte I ONAa[ 1 R M .,- m amen art. fa If hY to euk NM) 1 I I N.90 Aar r'I n^yu;t�l.mo) l.. J ROR YNIC $l9Mt -EL". or a• ,-4d wwRlT Note, I (T - / \ AKW. IINL Y IA1WU A N9MIY Li , MIf]�LnO6 �) (II III III ^LJCJIFI )f Ivl v �I �_� / ` \I \ \ / �\\ / \ r#:RIPnoN OF iPFRTr 1 I \•. -- >•>- -- DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR - I j / / I { , The Swth 113.31) feet of the South west Q.,W of SecUan 23, Tamehlp M Ranys 24, Anoka 11�\ III III l 111 ( l r7 1I / \ 4 = DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT County,, Minnesota. I)by Easterly of the Easterly right of say One of Prairie Road. O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET AND � _ MARKED WITH LICENSE NO. I8420 DENOTES HYDRANT x01 DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE I. The P'VhW -al ee.Mer ha meth w elwtgetlm or hdsp.ndert >wra, b w. ents of read. �\ �- t/ - DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL wumbmM, ,MMMH.. w.wmM, a.nWab me.. ono,, w anY ath- foaM that on eca+oto and arrant W4 F �-�J L _ -- - ic_ --_� L -_ -_J \�\ %� -�\ �.� ...- DENOTES UTILITY POLE search.., dl.daee t l - DENOTES GUY WIRE DENOTES EXISTING BURIED TELEPHONE x vaiwaw e9 M nre>d h Ih. ,pPn of M. ubdf b. Depth of Wk Cul -d.-S Lw9th. and Front 1 \ �' I----- - - - --T DENOTES EXISTING BURIED GAS Lbeahe) I DENOTES EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC DENOTES WATER LINE 1 yEMA Flaad iww m when the PebvetM fiam iTMA iYal Path x)aee9 mle B aatN DENOTES SANITARY SEWER ENE AdY 14 1911 - -_- __Ill_ -i (y/ \ \ / \ / -0 -- DENOTES STORM SEWER LINE / -EE•\ -^4 �1__ / 11 ! -'-�;I ITT 1i \4 \ \� / (� �\ -W-. DENOTES DELINEATED WETLAND 4Uoth"RMMww and feag. to Rwnm. Ed.LLly dldNg w Lot) to be rwlawd. - -i L_� T- / / / /�/ / / I 1 V \ -� �-- = DENOTES SIGN \ ,I rT - --I ./ I 1 \ \ \ I -Y 4. Trol and Mahtwwp Vield. Easwlwts to N awtN by agsat. h>b,oaoo . V�Ylln IT 11_x` -_'- ter/ / /' / / ) 1 ./ \ \\ © =DENOTES SML BORING (BY OTHERS) v�' N // kJ'fiV =DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE (DIAMETER) S No mwumwt Mpl Domed b DdF arv.lapmnt / r \I I \\ - 1 / //t / \( I 1 / �/, `\ �, �� /' - -- 41- DENOTES CONIFEROUS TREE (SPREAD) e. Owdunwh -Tan Nut Hydrant N Northeast ycNwt of FlMnaatlw of 140th Lane NW and TIM 3l Nan, /I / "� / /// �'� - -� , / \ `_, /� ` \\ \\ T - DENOTES G OF WOODS Oawtbn.wT.35 (NA'A 191E) -DEN EDGE _% L �_«_� L -_- / , /,'/ / ��— -a._/ � � - � - a DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK ENE T. ON* T y J3 1 - s , / _ - -_ ,9a4�nY feat tNed b Nrtwwn Mdrvl A>aadeta tx 011 edlarnl paawtY taPwrephY by Nn4E0 1rl / _ _ - DENOTES EXISTING EASEMENT LINE UOAp Mappbg (Z feet aemm�r>). 11I r =DENOTES EXISTING PARCEL LINES ,'- \ \ ��`\ / %� 1 \ I / / / 6 5th hwha• d4pkt4d by Nmth4m TMnalopi4a "' �) �. ^' •� Jy.,, - \1° 9. Mweay aaee..w b Lot• I we 14. Blodr 1 mu.l Mat Imt 10 fool hem the Inlwwagm of 141.t A.. NW and l.. Saw NW. '__- _17y\- III /`_ III/ /__ / /� T ?`..�� •\ \ � � \ 1 \ ��� �, �� - _ -�� -� \ l `��___ _ v i 1 I ✓ 7 / ^1 / /�/ 1 I ,r \ �� I ME R,� I I I EhII 1 -Dr. RS. el I / I / i i\ aaR>� x4-D+ 9 Ed.ard �.pemn ante. dwa _mom Imo of ty.-Swlh 311m f 01_N• \ \\ ran /4 o1 � 23 T.3Z R.2. \� < . �� �i J ( j/ ��_, �\ ����,.�_ - - i�__'' __r•`��___ _ ��` I N0936'SS'E��` / / / 04s dos A Pa i>,y_ \ \ l -y10f ONO Iplof, Z� ll INpM Mwlh \ \ r I r r / i /!r ,>>1 IJ4 I i III I I i e, �/1. uadiM -- I I -"� II I I -T- _ CEIVER I 'v 3�xaWawce9 I %2 1 2014 / I E Noe m Y Ti�e`o$ ap >:a E °W 0 �E-0rnc z TOy� V .MEJO 5� `aa O tea n 2nd^ n oif QperS u nd o , ro qa u n„° -° co _ L l U a 0 _ `ova« V S Q Q �N bJ•y � � a� L <Illm 7r; A OVi U N Fd cd 4 ,M O V ed R'4 1 O 1 0 U2 oa o U P4 a Q U � F� 207E R\- £� \' /t - Wa I \ \\ Saud 1/4 C or of -T- _ CEIVER I 'v 3�xaWawce9 I %2 1 2014 / I E Noe m Y Ti�e`o$ ap >:a E °W 0 �E-0rnc z TOy� V .MEJO 5� `aa O tea n 2nd^ n oif QperS u nd o , ro qa u n„° -° co _ L l U a 0 _ `ova« V S Q Q �N bJ•y � � a� L <Illm 7r; A OVi U N Fd cd 4 ,M O V ed R'4 1 O 1 0 U2 oa o U P4 a Q U � F� 207E R\- £� \' A flr\ITl/'C n.l aN Wa I \ \\ Saud 1/4 C or of -T- _ CEIVER I 'v 3�xaWawce9 I %2 1 2014 / I E Noe m Y Ti�e`o$ ap >:a E °W 0 �E-0rnc z TOy� V .MEJO 5� `aa O tea n 2nd^ n oif QperS u nd o , ro qa u n„° -° co _ L l U a 0 _ `ova« V S Q Q �N bJ•y � � a� L <Illm 7r; A OVi U N Fd cd 4 ,M O V ed R'4 1 O 1 0 U2 oa o U P4 a Q U � F� 141ST LANE NW IF / I{ I —� E IDFNG / RESIDENCE REMOVE y WIRE FENCE LEGEND ----- e93 - - - -- EXISTING CONTOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPERTY LINE RIGHT -OF -WAY — EASEMENT LINE — W DELINEATED WETLAND ...__.:- TREE LINE a'� '*F`- DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES ice, .. —•'• — " — FEMA 100 -YEAR FLOOD FRINGE BOUNDARY ............... FEMA 500 -YEAR FLOOD FRINGE BOUNDARY — v GAS LINE T -EV? - BURIED TELEPHONE LINE — p -or- OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE El TELEPHONE PEDESTAL C LIGHT POLE POWER POLE GUY WIRE �^ EXISTING GATE VALVE 'CY EXISTING HYDRANT — > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER --- 1 EXISTING WATERMAIN S EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER -� EXISTING SIGN REFERENCE NOTES: 1Q A13ANDONING THE WATER FAUCET SHALL CONFORM TO ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS. , I I 1 1 lr, 50 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET SAWCUT AND ? r it \ �m # �\ <�F„S--" a' // l t / /" T--- •T' —�-- v REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER f rJ �4 \ relw+a `� SAWCUT AND-REMOVE'`'�- -_ - - -� I '•\ _ - - c! - /� \I / BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, e9e,EXISTING BUILDING I \\ _ \\ \ SAWCUT, REMOVE AND 'AND (3) SHEDS 059_ / i I� vv A \ �o�� MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PER CITY I STANDARD DRAWING \ \ 878- NO. 520 \ , 1 me / CLEAR AND- GRUB TRE i _ ( ) - , t nP. I REMOVE KENNEL AND ABANDON WATER FAUCET 9 Ila CLEAR AND GRUB TREES- t / _ v - - 1 \ - -- ` qqr[ cc I Ip�E \ _�i i /''mil r" \ - - _ '� — _- — - �(': i.r I cgercxcc wniER -- 599 _ SAWCUT, REMOVE AND MILL BITUMINOUS y l \ y PAVEMENT PER V Av CITY STANDARD / I °x DRAWING NO. 526 J L_ —. — _- J L — — — J — — _..._ I_ — — — J _ _ — J L_ — — — _� L — — — / \ \ 140TH LANE NW — > sWnlvx > lw 074 9, RIM =894.99 NVW =884 3 I I \ / �C - - - -- r - - -- r - - -- r -- —� - - -� —— 1 - -- I - - -� \V. / L DATE REVISION I hereby certify rr, foal fhb plan, 1r.ol(IC p.,i i. raper, was Y1c� En Anderson EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND „ CI EV EIV 1 prepared by me or und.r my direct supwision and that I TAE - HQkaIIJ011 Al1:IGI JQl1 6/1 8 14 CITY REV am a duly licensed Prof...tonal Engineer under the In.a 6 �[3 0! the Slat. of MI" da. Rtw„, Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors REMOVALS PLAN TAE 3601 Thurston Ave ----j 763- 427 -5660 0 Anoka, Minnesota 55303 CARSON RIDGE DE A. FAX 763- 427 -0520 g -x Date 3/10/14 Lie. No. 43362 CJJ www.hakanson- anderson.com CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA SHEETS iAS7 nA C-Exi�n EOF_ \ ���� Ef - LOW AREA N0. 1 aae 0 ' / a• > 0 TYPE III BARRICADE I v v NG"882:5 EE,. `\ v\ `v v v PER CITY STANDARD -iJ i i /i/ /` _ � _ 892,� B9 1004Y HWL =88f.7 -\ / C !i �� ` / 1�70TE ;© «> v A ADRAWING N0. 509 I E.O.F. ! � Gov ✓,!!; s0p,` �- \ � �; `_,` -�a93 `_ - „ - _ II i/' Ii'+'; 1 -8' BITUMINOUS -/ Qe /fl �+ J7-,- m \, - \ \ 1 �" •- \\ Y', F °\ FEMA BASE FLOOD [tg' ' v �1� \ \ ^ ;7G -: . - !..€ 1. N, •\ ;7 +\ �,£ r. \,1a •v, fleme<t4r t\ \, \ , / \\ 1 ELEVATI0 N =878.4 \'ll u \ r «> I <ano ? COON CREEK ATLAS 14 I RECONSTRUCT 8618 / I' <' I 72\ 1'. m 13 •'+ j 4 �,d : \. \L s, \\ SEE I\ FLOOD ELEVATION =878.5 u �/ �e o,o iD _ 11 . .. 1 /BL / • . 9 ,Z GUTTER C' RB AND ,per \� : k _: FB FE- -.'... 1 .i FBI f�.` cF-e / 9i ,GF 9931 ' m .1 ' •'A / �- GUTTERERIMN /DOT i \ `' �((++��+ y C+ 1 STANDARD PLATE 7100 / �� G"` 1 ! F =898.8 LF =889.8 -F =898 B r J l 3 f Bg$r} [T -ea8.1 -_ T '- -7 1 `V CONSTRUCTCHECK , ^v '.• DAM PERU) f A v A r c � i T - '-y- _ • v � v - �\ ��o , 1 A v�,,�`Z" I V v � v RECONSTRUCT / \ ec aAl b-• \\ \ 3 1 t 1 1 L 1'1 \ 1 \ �I \`eye \ � \ STREET'TO THE -a2q 6 45I AE N > ` f4AILBO \ . ' \., •, \ _ \I \� . 1 I LTRATION -BASIN EXISTING SECTION "NGWL =876.0 g ' ` / '\ \ \ "/ k _ r - _ I- \ - \ •_\ Im / « \ 100 -YR ;HWL= 8831.4 \ F8 +Fl,F \• \ B \ I / GF= 909„8' / \I GF =899.2 I GF =898.1 .GF= 899.0\ r �� GF =895.9 I GF =89 0' L�- 885.8E / �\ C` t•C. a ✓ ,� LF= 81J2.3 1�- Lf =a9 L5 LF =890.6 LF =890.3 \ LF- 98.2 LF= 887.3' �- - l 'P I _ 2: J I l / r99 --� / « <... \ 0 1 / �• 0 nI i -/ - 99.9 �~\ 6g _I -� I / -�8 Ti� �' y mio CONSTRUCT / Mwc S' WIDE BERM ! e � I �\ \ , A ��� � t -•. � '��. � v� � - 6a: �.�-�s .�' I c 1 • 9 �ocB� se.v AT ELEV= 884.4/ i 1 m � 7 s '•ti I lj 106 I "Ji S99.91 •` %1 L �i� 0.2i - 106 - \\ 7 '- 1 1 F �` ` i � � - - � F' ` .�. i I T -Ba4� � r -ea8.o _ - / \ B -684.0 - T 889.0 « \ 1 E. .F. zs.,... 8-884.0 8-888.0 ` -sa6 892.s �' 7.2 892.5 ri� "' I B-884.0 I o BLOCK \ _ RETAINING I v WALLQ2 4Q �� A I - - -J L -- _ J L _- - -I L - -_ J L L - - -J \\ \ BEEHIVE NO. NGWL =882.5 2.5 140TH LANE NW - RIM =891.0 > µ x > 50 a so 100 100 -YR HWL =891.1 ,x pe. ei'a.90 \ / .91Se9- \\ SCALE IN FEET F I- GENERAL NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO IMPORTING OR EXPORTING MATERIAL FROM THE SITE, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER CITY OF ANDOVER STANDARD DRAWING NO. 605. all \ / I 2. REVEGETATION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 7 DAYS OF ROUGH GRADING. 3. SEE SHEETS 2 -5 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES, TABULATIONS AND DETAILS. 4. SITE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY HAKANSON ANDERSON. 5. STREETS AND PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE KEPT FREE FROM SEDIMENT CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, K' SITE RUNOFF AND BLOWING DUST. 6. CATEGORY 2 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, 12 FEET IN WIDTH, SHALL BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO ALL WETLAND BUFFERS. LEGEND 2© STORM SEWER STRUCTURE NUMBER 7. EXCEPT FOR THE INFILTRATION AREAS, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH Mn /DOT SEED MIX 22 -111 OR APPROVED EQUAL AND MULCHED WITH DISC ANCHORED, TYPE 1 MULCH MATERIAL. THE INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH Mn DOT SEED MIX FBWO FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT 33 -262. / ------ 8a3 - - -- EXISTING CONTOUR e SOIL BORING LOCATION FBLO FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT eas- PROPOSED CONTOUR F8 FULL BASEMENT B. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE 4:1 OR FLATTER. - - - - - EASEMENT LINE PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER GF GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 9. THIS SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT. - - - SETBACK LINE PER CITY STANDARD DRAWING N0. 501 LF LOW FLOOR ELEVATION 10. AFTER CONSTRUCTION, APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT A TEST ON THE INFILTRATION BASIN BY FILLING THE BASIN TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF • - • • -- FEMA 100 -YEAR FLOOD FRINGE BOUNDARY >o-:•:•:•;: ;;;;;;;: PROPOSED RIPRAP PER CITY STANDARD LO LOOKOUT ELEVATION 5 INCHES WITH WATER AND MONITORING THE TIME NECESSARY TO DRAIN. THE COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT SHALL BE NOTIFIED • FEMA 500-YEAR FLOOD FRINGE BOUNDARY :;:ai;:a;i:i;::s:i: i; DRAWING N0. 411 + DENOTES DROPPING GARAGE FLOOR ONE COURSE PRIOR TO THE TEST TO WITNESS THE RESULTS. ONLY LOW PRESSURE TYPE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF w PROPOSED GATE VALVE DRAINAGE ARROW THE INFILTRATION BASIN. Y PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED 16.5' CONSTRUCTION BUFFER ����- SITE TRIANGLE - PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE 11. TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN NORTH OF THE PROPERTY IS BASED ON THE MINNESOTA DNR UDAR DATA. - PROPOSED WATER SERVICE T- 866.0^ DENOTES TOP OF RETAINING WALL ELEVATION REFERENCE NOTES: > PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED MAINTENANCE VEHICLE ACCESS 8- 861.OR 1 BITUMINOUS TRAIL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF ANDOVER STANDARD DRAWING N0. 7148. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP SHALL BE I PROPOSED WATERMAIN DENOTES GROUND ELEVATION AT CONSTRUCTED AT 141ST AVENUE NW AND SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY OF ANDOVER STANDARD DRAWING NO. 7198. t9 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PROPOSED FILL AREA BASE OF RETAINING WALL / N PROPOSED CATCH BASIN M PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION TRUNCATED DOMES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MN DOT STANDARD PLATE 7038. ® PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE ® e Q RETAINING WALL SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY STANDARD DRAWING N0. 611, FINAL WALL DESIGN SHALL BE COMPLETED BY WETLAND BUFFER SIGN PER q) INLET PROTECTION DEYICE PER CITY THE BLOCK MANUFACTURER'S ENGINEER. >> PROPOSED STORM SEWER STANDARD DRAWING NOS. 604 AND 619 fe PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION ® INFILTRATION BASIN SIGN PER e OO AFTER INITIAL GRADING, COMPLETELY SURROUND LOW AREA 1 AND POND 1 WITH SILT FENCE TO PREVENT THE AREAS FROM FILLING WITH -0 : -- SILT FENCE PER CITY STANDARD 2 E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION SEDIMENT. DRAWING NO. 601 884.4 ® INSTALL CEDAR SPLIT RAIL FENCE ALONG THE TOP OF THE RETAINING WALL. N DATE REVISION hereby aertuy that tnie plan, speclncaeon. or report wo "m W.. GRADING DRAINAGE AND SHEET CITY REVI 1 prepared by me or under my dir.cf oupervislan and that el TAE - Hakanson Anderson + 6 1 14 CITY REVIEW am a duly Lleeneed prof ... i ... I Engineer under the laws ���y % OY REVIEW 3 of the star. of Mm a. aawa n: Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors EROSION CONTROL PLAN 7/2`1/14 CITY R 4 TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 CARSON RIDGE of '.� aam m: 763- 427 -5860 FAX 763 -427 -0520 9 x Date 3!10/14 Lic. No. 43362 CJJ www.hokonson- anderson.com CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA SHEETS AW. 7 nd F • ' ^ 'I L; . I DELINEATION OF TREE LINE 1 PROTECTION SHALL IDEALLY BE LOCATED AT THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE DRIPLINE. TREELINE ELEVATION VIEW NO SCALE TREE PROTECTION � WOODLOT DELINEATION l TREE PROTECTION 6' MIN 6' MIN DELINEATION L's. .4 A 1. STANDARD 48" HIGH SNOW FENCE OR ORANGE SAFETY 4TREE PROTECTION FENCE. DELINEATION 2.CAUTION RIBBON 4" WIDE MAY BE USED AS PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION OR APPROVED EQUAL. PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION MAY ONLY BE UTILIZED TO DELINEATE TREE SAVE AREAS WHICH ARE REMOTE FROM AREAS OF LAND DISTURBANCE. 3.STEEL POSTS AS NEEDED. 4. DELINEATION OF TREE LINE PROTECTION SHALL EXTEND CONTINUOUSLY THROUGH PROTECTION AREAS, TOTALLY SURROUND INDIVIDUAL SPECIMENS AS NOTED, OR EXTEND ACROSS THE FACE AND THE ENDS SHALL EXTEND 6' BACK FOR INDIVIDUAL TREE LINE PROTECTION. i.�. �9n,. -893 -- — L 18" MIN. 1�4J TREE SAVE 12" MIN. T AREA 1. SIGN TO BE PLACE 100' O.C. ALONG FENCE THRU WOODED LOT AREA, ON INDIVIDUAL SPECIMENS WHERE NOTED, AND ONE ON EACH TREE LINE AREA TO BE SAVED. SIGNS TO BE AFFIXED TO STEEL POSTS. 2. ALL PASSIVE TREE PROTECTION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY "KEEP OUT" OR "TREE SAVE AREA" SIGNAGE. �PON TYPICAL SIGN No SCALE TREE PROTECTION DELINEATION (1) 1� 40 0 40 ea SCALE IN FEET GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL TREES SHOWN SHALL BE PROTECTED. 2. NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORT WILL OCCUR WITHIN THE WOODLAND SIDE OF PROTECTIVE DELINEATION WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. 3. ERECT PROTECTIVE DELINEATION CONTINUOUSLY ALONG DRIP LINE OF SIGNIFICANT TREES CLOSEST TO STREET RIGHTS —OF —WAY. FINAL LOCATION OF DELINEATION SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY ENGINEER IN THE FIELD. SECURE DELINEATION TO METAL POSTS AT A HEIGHT OF 4 FEET. 4. GRADING SHALL COMMENCE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BRIEFED ON PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES. 5. NO TRENCH FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE PERMITTED ON THE WOODLAND SIDE OF PROTECTIVE DELINEATION. 6. IF PRUNING IS NECESSARY, PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON FOR SPECIES. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS OF TREE REPLACEMENT RESULTING FROM DAMAGE TO TREES WITHIN PROTECTED AREAS. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PROTECTIVE DELINEATION AND SIGNS IN GOOD REPAIR THROUGHOUT DURATION OF PROJECT. 9. ALL UTILITIES INSTALLED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE WITHIN STREET RIGHTS —OF —WAY OR UTILITY EASEMENTS. 10. CONTACT THE CITY FORESTER (ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT) AT 755 -5100 TO ARRANGE A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH THE CITY FORESTER/TREE INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBANCE. 11. ALL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. 12. ORANGE POLY SAFETY FENCE OR ORANGE SILT FENCE SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE DRIPLINE OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY FORESTER. REFERENCE NOTES: 1Q ALL OTHER TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PASSIVE. 5 I 14 I REVIEW 1 preparaE by mr er under my diretl supervial"n and Ihaf —.TAE Hakonson Anderson TREE PRESERVATION PLAN em a tlul Lieemed Probaaional Engineer antler fhe Iowa SHEET fi 18 14 CITY R VIEW 2 y 8 7 u Cm REVI of the State or Nlu e. Iwaay R; Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka. Minnesota 55303 CARSON RIDGE OF atom n: 763 -427 -5860 FAX 763- 427 -0520 B 110=q 10 VINT A. Date 3110/14 Lic. No. 43362 CJJ www.hokonson— anderson.eom CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA SHEETS 6 "X6" DIP REDUCER, 5LF 6" DIP, 6" GATE VALVE 6: BOX AND / HYDRANT Al / 'EXISTING 1"a/Ir "ESIDEN E 64LF (INC. APRON) / IS* RCP 00.91X O APRON 113 INV =884.50 1 CB /MN 103 B" GATE R� y 48 DIA. (421A) VALVE i FL= 889.50 \ BOX / '- 94LF 1 (E)INV =883.82 SAN/IsM 95 ._ _ 8" PVC i SUMP= 881,82 \ / RIM= 897.92 O 0.66% CS 102 /. INV= 886.82 - / - 2 - 2' %3' (4208) SAN / MN 6 3 FL= 890.10 SAN /MH /4 RIM„897.44 RIM =89 4.62 (S)INV= 887.10 7ERMAIN (W A2 (HW)IHV =S86.2D SUMP= 885.60 (E)INV= 886.10 O 61.1 INV =882.9 I 12" RCP-- ACUMTOO CONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT R(V= 876.69 31LF 15" RCP O 1.00% f -CB /MH 104 48' DIA. (4 I -141LF 15" RCP O 0.95% 157LF \ e" PVC O 0.40% I '' NO - I 7 1 + III I a+ I + 1 1' 18" RCP O 2.17% 48" DIA. (421A) HOUSE' o ! STM /MH 112 110 - jAPRON '48" DIA. (4098- 880.00 Tom' lio RIM =884.40 I ` .I 0SUMP 882.43 (W)INV= 880.08 I 1 41ST AVE NW (SE)INV= 880.08 D8 / BE " -'- 60" DIA. 4181 128LF » e RIM= 83.41 (E)INV= 880.50 B" PVC O 0.409 SAN /MH /2' -.. APRON 108 (W)INV= 880.50 L _ I _ l _ _ _ DIP BEND ` SAN /MH /1 (S)INV= 875.96 20LF (INC. APRON) J (N)INV= 876.06 18" RCP O -2.509 ' (S)INV= 875.35 (W)INV= 877.50 " __ .. 8 -22 1/2' 271 pLF _'- 8--22 1/2' AND 11 1/4' S" PVC CS /IAN 100 - 15" RCP DIP BEND DIP BENDS 8'X6" DIP TEE, 0 2.009 48" DIA. (421A) 1 O 1.00% \ CONNECT TO EXISTING WA7ERMAIN BY CUTTING IN 8'X6" DIP TEE. 47LF 6" DIP, 32LF 6" DIP, 6" GATE VALVE k ! BOX AND HYDRANT FL= 890.50 (S)INV= 886.80 119Lf (N)INV= 886.50 12" RCP A (E)INV= 885.00 6" GATE VALVE k O 1,15X I 8"X6" DIP TEE. USE DIP SLEEVES TO CONNECT DI BOX AND HYDRANT SUMP = 883.00 i 8-11 1 /4' / TO EXISTING WA7ERMAIN. DIP BEND CB 107 / i 27" DIA. (40111) FL= 891.00 _ i (N)INV= 888.17 ' e" GATE VALVE # / BOX / CONNECT TO J EXISTING WATERMAIN Wt I 40 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET �8 "X6" DIP TEE, 14LF 6" DIP, 6" DATE VALVE k BOX AND HYDRANT 8 "XB" DIP TEE. 8 " -22 1/T DIP BEND AND 8" GATE VALVE k BOX "tr8" GATE CB /MH 106 VALVE 48 DIA. (421 A) 129LF ,t BOX FL 890.87 21' RCP (E)INV.Se1,67 O 1.239 (S)INV =884.32 (N)INV= 882.07 26LF (INC. APRON) SUMP = 879.67 21" RCP O 0.31X - -- - -! APRON 107 1 ... _ ..... - -_ INV = 880_00 _ 15 RCP O 1.009 23LF (INC. APRON) CB /MH 105 18" RCP O 2.17% 48" DIA. (421A) FL= 891.03 STM /MH 112 110 (N)1NV 884.43 jAPRON '48" DIA. (4098- 880.00 (W)INV= 884.53 RIM =884.40 0SUMP 882.43 (W)INV= 880.08 (SE)INV= 880.08 STM /MH 109 C1 " -'- 60" DIA. 4181 128LF RIM= 83.41 (E)INV= 880.50 B" PVC O 0.409 SAN /MH /2' -.. APRON 108 (W)INV= 880.50 RIM = 891.41 INV = 880.00 ` SAN /MH /1 (S)INV= 875.96 20LF (INC. APRON) RIM = 893.69 (N)INV= 876.06 18" RCP O -2.509 (S)INV= 875.35 (W)INV= 877.50 (N)INY= 875.45 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER INV =875.35 13 I V 1 W W K F N X W J va 140TH LANE NW sAN /MH S ? / RIM =894.90 lNV(N) "874.94 IN V(E)= 874.89 [NV(W)=884.9±- _ \ GENERAL NOTES: 1. ADDITIONAL STORM SEWER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE ON SHEET 2. REFERENCE NOTES: 1� SEE CITY STANDARD DRAWING NO. 418E FOR WEIR AND ORIFICE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. DATE REVISION I hereby certify that Ihls plan, speclflcafian, or report was mum er: SHEET 1 CITY REVIEW i Pnpand by ce or ender my dlrecl supervHlon and ihol I TAE _ _ Hakanson Anderson UTILITY PLAN 6 IS 14 ITY REVIEW 2 am a tluly Licensed Pro(evlonol Engineer under the lows 9 7 7 14 CITY IEW 3 of the State of MInpASWO, ^ pDry eF Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 CARSON RIDGE Dr ---- aDID x. 763- 427 -5860 FAX 763- 427 -0520 9 Date 3 10 14 �L Ic, No, 43362 C3J www.hokonson- anderson.com CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA SNEETS A917 OA