Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/10/2015• F ...,.,. 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.ANDOVERMN.GOV Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda March 10, 2015 Andover City Hall Council Chambers 7.00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes — February 10, 2015 Regular Meeting 3. PUBLIC HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Tract A, RLS No. 262 — 3200 South Coon Creek Drive — Incorporate Property into MUSA and Change Land Use Designation from OS, Open Space to URL Urban Residential Low Density - City of Andover 4. Other Business a. Discuss Participation in Andover Family Fun Fest City Booth 5. Adjournment 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes — February 10, 2015 Work Session and Regular Meeting DATE: March 10, 2015 REQUEST The Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to approve the minutes from the February 10, 2015 work session and regularly scheduled meeting. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MEETING — FEBRUARY 10, 2015 The Regular Bi- Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Vice Chairperson Daninger on February 10, 2015, 6:30 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners present: Commissioners Timothy Cleven, Lynae Gudmundson, Bert Koehler IV, Kyle Nemeth, and Jeff Simms. Commissioners absent: Steve Peterson Also present: Community Development Director Dave Carlberg City Planner Stephanie Hanson Others SWEARING IN OF COMMISSIONERS. Commissioners Nemeth and Simms were sworn in as Commissioners on the Planning and Zoning Commission. NOMINATE AND APPOINT CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR Chairperson nominations: Commissioner Gudmundson nominated Commissioner Daninger, Commissioner Cleven seconded the nomination. Commissioner Koehler nominated Commissioner Nemeth, there was no second. Commissioner Simms asked what the role of the Chairperson was. Vice Chairperson Daninger explained the role of the Chairperson. Motion by Koehler, Seconded by Nemeth to close the nominations. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent (Peterson) vote. There was a private vote. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — February 10, 2015 Page 2 Vice Chairperson Daninger was voted 4 -2 as Chairperson of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Commissioner Cleven nominated Commissioner Nemeth as Vice Chairperson, Commissioner Daninger seconded the nomination. Motion by Koehler, seconded by Gudmundson, to appoint Commissioner Nemeth as Vice Chairperson. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent (Peterson) vote. APPROVE 2015 MEETING SCHEDULE Commissioner Nemeth asked as part of their meeting schedule when would the 4`h Tuesday of the month meeting come into play. Mr. Carlberg stated they may choose to schedule the meeting for the 4th Tuesday of the month if there is an application that is time sensitive. The 4`h Tuesday is looked at as an alternate meeting date on a need basis. Motion by Nemeth, seconded by Koehler, to approve the 215 meeting schedule. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent (Peterson) vote. OTHER BUSINESS. Chairperson Daninger reviewed the Planning Commission procedures during the meetings. Examples were given. Commissioner Nemeth asked if they could have a workshop session on the IUP's, especially the subordinate classroom structures. Mr. Carlberg noted that this might be a good topic for a joint meeting with the City Council which could happen in the next few months. ADJOURNMENT. Motion by Nemeth, seconded by Cleven, to adjourn the meeting at 7:00 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent (Peterson) vote. Respectfully Submitted, Sue Osbeck, Recording Secretary Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING — FEBRUARY 10, 2015 The Regular Bi- Monthly Meeting of the Andover Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Daninger on February 10, 2015, 7:00 p.m., at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners present: Commissioners Timothy Cleven, Lynae Gudmundson, Bert Koehler IV, Kyle Nemeth, and Jeff Sims Commissioners absent: Steve Peterson Also present: Community Development Director Dave Carlberg City Planner Stephanie Hanson Others APPROVAL OF MINUTES. November 10, 2014 Commissioner Nemeth indicated he had some grammatical changes he would like to make. He stated on page 2, last paragraph, third sentence should read "...a pear reviewed study ", the sentence after that should be "...and if they impact a propertiesy's desirability. ", and the second to the last sentence should read "...negatively impact interest in a property e€ or the price." Commissioner Nemeth stated on page number 3, fourth paragraph, third sentence from end should read "...many people do not have a land line} hone..." to clarify the point that they are talking about a land line phone. A change should be made to the seventh paragraph "Commissioner Koehler asked what the height of the trees in is$f the surrounding area." Commissioner Nemeth stated page 4, first paragraph, first sentence "...tower had no negative impact on property values... ", fourth paragraph, third sentence from the end should read "He submitted a letter from a tower engineer and their application and in the letter they identified four heights..." Another change to be made is in the seventh paragraph, second sentence, "...from the public right of way..." should be broken up to read "...from the public right of way. There is an existing driveway..." on the last Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — February 10, 2015 Page 2 paragraph of the page, last sentence should read "He was not sure about Fox Meadow Park but it was higher than the Fire Station..." Commissioner Nemeth indicated on page 5, first paragraph, second sentence should read "...the ordinance limits them to 120 feet overall so 110 feet will have a lightning rod on top...", page 7, fourth paragraph, sentence should read "Commissioner Daninger stated regarding rack space, if they grant this ... ", page 11, ninth paragraph, third sentence from the end "...will be leaving this up to the builders to provide the landscape and trees... ". Another change on page five, tenth paragraph, second sentence should read "...are provided additional buffering, except for lots 8, 18 and 20..." Next sentence should read "Mr. Rude stated there is a large wetland complex to the south." Commissioner Nemeth stated on page 13, sixth paragraph, fifth sentence should read "...neighbor's..." not "...neighbors'..." Motion by Nemeth, seconded by Cleven, to approve the minutes as amended. Motion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- present (Simms), 1- absent (Peterson) vote. PUBLIC HEARING: Planned Unit Development Amendment — Country Oaks West — 161" Avenue NW and Wintergreen Street NW— Lamb Properties, LLC. City Planner Hanson noted the purpose of this item is to hold a public hearing and take input on a Planned Unit Development Amendment — Country Oaks West — 1615` Avenue NW and Wintergreen Street NW. City Planner Hanson reviewed the proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment with the Commission. Commissioner Koehler stated there are some inconsistencies in the maps in the packet and he wanted to make sure they are looking at the same map as staff. He noted on the map Ms. Hanson showed with the highlighted area, it appears that the lots are one off from the properties that are in the more detailed plans and he wanted to make sure he was reading it correctly because it appeared there should be one more property highlighted on the north side of the strip and one less highlighted on the south side of the strip. Ms. Hanson indicated Commissioner Koehler was correct. Commissioner Simms asked for a clarification of a detached single family townhome and a single family home. He wondered if there was a distinction from a code standpoint or why is it being designated as a detached townhome versus a single family home. Ms. Hanson stated the difference is the area of land around the townhome that it is all common ground and the association will take care of those areas. It is all common space whereas a single family residence has their own yard, which is taken care of by the homeowner. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — February 10, 2015 Page 3 Commissioner Nemeth asked if there were any concerns regarding the change in the side yard setback, changing that from the ten feet to the five feet, are there any safety concerns or staff concerns. Ms. Hanson stated staff does not have any concerns with it and engineering also reviewed the drainage with having them detached and nothing has changed with it. Commissioner Nemeth asked if there are existing easements that will remain and are those related to utilities. Ms. Hanson stated the easements are typical of what they take with any plat. The drainage and utility easements in the rear yards will remain in place but they will need additional ones on the lots where the twin homes shared the common lot line. Commissioner Nemeth stated regarding the landscaping plans, he thought he heard Ms. Hanson state the developer is planning on installing a fence along the Burlington Northern Railway or did he mishear that. Ms. Hanson stated the developer has discussed with staff that he would like to do that, it will not be a requirement of him but he will be required to plant the sixty -five white pines that were a part of the original plat and he will be doing that. Commissioner Nemeth stated in the notes it indicates the original landscaping plan also included various foundation plantings, when talking about foundation plantings, are these plantings that are near the house. Ms. Hanson reviewed the original and revised landscaping plans with the Commission. Commissioner Nemeth stated regarding the boulevard trees, he thought they discussed at a meeting or worksession that the City is moving away from them because they become an obstacle, need to be pruned more and can encroach on the roadway so he was a little surprised to see the two boulevard trees as required by the City Code. He stated he would like some clarification on that. Ms. Hanson stated the way the Code reads is you have to have two trees in the front yard but was not sure if the word boulevard was used in the Code or not. These trees are not in the right -of -way, they have to be planted outside of the right -of -way, in the front yard. Mr. Carlberg reiterated that they are not really boulevard trees but they are in the front yard outside of the right -of -way. He believed they were mislabeled on the plan. Commissioner Gudmundson asked if this was posted for the twin home owners. Ms. Hanson stated everyone was notified and there was one comment wondering what type of structure would be built and also if they would be part of the association as well. Commissioner Gudmundson asked if the association was financially stable now because last time this came before them there were some issues. Ms. Hanson indicated she did not know. Commissioner Gudmundson asked if this was a concern of the City. Mr. Carlberg stated this is a concern for those that are a part of the association but with this development they are actually adding properties. Before, these units were going to be Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — February 10, 2015 Page 4 brought out of the association so this helps the association because they will have additional properties that will be paying their association dues. Commissioner Cleven asked if the Fire Department has any issues with the narrowness between the buildings. Ms. Hanson stated they did not. Chairperson Daninger asked for confirmation that the homeowners association will be responsible for grass cutting, snow plowing and landscaping maintenance. Ms. Hanson stated that was correct. Chairperson Daninger asked who was responsible for the landscaping of the existing twin homes. Ms. Hanson stated it is part of the same association. Motion by Koehler, seconded by Nemeth, to open the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent (Peterson) vote. Mr. Matt Pavick, Engineer at Civil Site Group, representing the builder was at the meeting to answer questions. Commissioner Gudmundson asked why there are not any foundation plantings. Mr. Jon Jondahl, 9457 Hwy 10, Ramsey, who is the real estate agent for the development, stated because they are changing these homes from a twin home and along with other buffers they were trying to keep it standard to what was done with the single family homes. Commissioner Gudmundson asked if sod was going to go up to the foundation. Mr. Jondahl indicated that was what their intentions were. Commissioner Gudmundson stated the design of the homes looks good but quite a bit different from the twin homes and she wondered if there was any thought in sprucing up the twin homes to give it a more cohesive look. Mr. Jondahl stated they were not going to touch the twin homes. He stated they were going to mix up the look in accordance with what the new trends are. Commissioner Gudmundson stated the new designs look great but she worried about the value of the twin homes. Mr. Jondahl stated they are all covered by the association and as long as there is money coming in to support everything it is better than what it was before. They just do not have the money in there right now. Commissioner Cleven stated with taking the landscaping out around the foundation, the association may decide to put that in themselves as funding is available. Mr. Jondahl stated that was correct. Commissioner Nemeth asked why is there a change in the side yard setback from ten to five feet. Mr. Jondahl stated they are going to a detached unit so they need the separation to work all the way around the unit. As an attached unit it is wall to wall, so this gives more wiggle room and gives them an option to find plans that are reasonable and feasible Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — February 10, 2015 Page 5 to fit in there and still are going to sell in this market. They need as much space as they can to create a desired price point. Commissioner Nemeth asked what the price point on the homes will be. Mr. Jondahl stated they would be right around $250,000. Commissioner Nemeth stated regarding the back of the properties, it has been suggested to plant the 65 white pines and City staff mentioned the fence. He asked if the fence was going to be in addition to planting the 65 white pines. Mr. Jondahl stated that is something they were talking about doing to give them a nice buffer. Commissioner Gudmundson asked Mr. Pavick if the drainage changes. Mr. Pavick stated it essentially stays the same. He reviewed the drainage patterns with the Commission. Commissioner Gudmundson asked in order to get the swale in between the homes, foundation plantings could not be put on the sides. Mr. Pavick stated they could but it generally works better with a sodded swale. Motion by Nemeth, seconded by Koehler, to close the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent (Peterson) vote. Commissioner Nemeth asked for clarification regarding the action requested on number three about eliminating the foundation plantings and adding two boulevard trees. He wondered if this was a misprint because looking through the resolution he did not see anything referencing this. The City Code would not state two boulevard trees; it states two trees in the front yard. Mr. Carlberg indicated that was correct. Commissioner Nemeth asked if they approved this as is, the developer would have to provide two trees in the front yard, not boulevard. Staff indicated that was correct. Commissioner Koehler stated this is being set up as a PUD and he was having a hard time seeing the give and take on both sides. He thought there was a lot of trimming done on the plan after it has already been reviewed by the Commission where there was a lot of discussion and review done. Aside from the buffering in the back, he wondered where is the give and what do they see. Chairperson Daninger stated they saw the original landscaping plan of the existing twin home and the photo and plan does not match, which concerns him. He stated there is an association that will take care of the landscaping and he believed the City is giving too much by requiring just two trees. He would like to see something in the resolution that more landscaping is required. He thought that was the give and take and he believed the developer could do that because it becomes part of the cost of the home. He would like to see the landscape plan change and he leaves that up to staff. He would like to see something around the foundation in the front yard. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes —February 10, 2015 Page 6 Commissioner Koehler stated that was one of the ideas he had in the back of his head. He also wondered how dense the trees would be in the back because he would like to buffer the homes from the railroad tracks so a fence in addition would be nice. Commissioner Gudmundson thought a fence would be overkill and was discussed previously. She thought the trees are good but the landscaping in the front is a must and she did not think sod should go up to the foundation for drainage purposes. Commissioner Nemeth concurred regarding the fence requirement, if the 65 trees will be planted. In regards to the landscaping, he concurred to a point but they need to be careful, this is a PUD and he agreed with both Commissioner Koehler and Chairperson Daninger that it is give and take but he would also like to provide the builder and developer some flexibility regarding what can be planted and he would hate to tie their hands. He thought a tree or two additionally added to the single pad would be a good idea. He would like to give them some flexibility but concurred they needed to be dressed up a little bit. The homes looked very nice but he thought when it comes to the landscaping, it could use some additional but was not sure how to address that. Commissioner Cleven agreed there should be some landscaping but thought the association should be involved in the selection of this because they are the ones that will have to maintain them. Commissioner Nemeth stated he would like to give the actual homeowner some flexibility too. He thought it was a good idea to ask the developer to add some additional landscaping in the actual lots themselves. Commissioner Sims asked what consisted of a PUD. He thought there was a mix of different property types in that area and wondered if that was good or bad. Are these lower priced housing than what is surrounding and are they in danger of bringing down the values of all the homes if these are lower priced. Commissioner Koehler agreed this was a mix and added flexibility for the residents, on the flip side; there is an aesthetic aspect that it does not look the same. Commissioner Gudmundson agreed and struggled with the aesthetics of it as well but the land has been sitting there for quite a while and they don't want to build what they previously planned to build and there is an association that is not working right now so they already have six homeowners that have a defunct association and they have to consider that as well. She thought it was a property value issue as well. Ms. Hanson stated with the five foot setbacks the houses will not be any larger than what they have been as twin homes. With the twin homes they had forty feet to build on with ten feet in between and a common wall and this is the same thing but with five feet in between. Mr. Carlberg stated if they require ten foot setbacks, this house design could not be built. He stated this development is not being replatted, the developer is staying with the same lots but is building detached townhomes. If they want to eliminate lots, etc., the developer would need to replat the entire development. Regular Andover Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes — February 10, 2015 Page 7 Motion by Koehler, seconded by Nemeth, to recommend to the City Council approval of Planned Unit Development Amendment as written with the addendum to Item 9 in the Resolution, that the applicant work with staff and if staff deems appropriate with the association to come up with a landscaping plan, that is a little more in the spirit of what they had originally intended. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent (Peterson) vote City Planner Hanson stated that this item would be before the Council at the February 17, 2015 City Council meeting. OTHER BUSINESS. Community Development Director Carlberg updated the Planning Commission on related items. Commissioner Nemeth asked what the status was regarding the property at Hanson and Bunker Lake Boulevard. Mr. Carlberg stated they have had a lot of discussions and a couple of developers are looking at it but nothing has been submitted at this point. Chairperson Daninger welcomed Commissioner Sims to the Planning Commission. ADJOURNMENT. Motion by Nemeth, seconded by Gudmundson, to adjourn the meeting at 7:56 p.m. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0 -nays, 1- absent (Peterson) vote Respectfully Submitted, Sue Osbeck, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners FROM: Stephanie L. Hanson, City Planner SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) (15 -01) Consider Approving the following Amendments to the City of Andover Comprehensive Plan: Include 4.4 acres into the Metropolitan Urban Service (MUSA) Area, and to Change 4.4 acres of land from OS — Open Space to URL — Urban Residential Low Density — 3200 South Coon Creek Drive — City of Andover DATE: March 10, 2015 INTRODUCTION The City of Andover on behalf of Shadow Ponds, LLC is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The property is the future area for Creekside Meadows residential development, located at 3200 South Coon Creek Drive. DISCUSSION Consider Including of 4.4 acres into the MUSA and the 2015 — 2020 Sewer Staging Plan: Currently the 4.4 acre parcel is not located within the 2020 MUSA boundary or within the current stage of sewer expansion; however the surrounding parcels have local municipal utility services. The city Engineering Department completed an evaluation of the city's sewer capacity in this area and determined the additional hook ups create no significant changes to the local and regional systems. The Metropolitan Council and City Council has shown support to expand the sewer area to incorporate the 4.4 acre parcel. Consider to Change 4.4 acres of land from OS — Open Space to URL — Urban Residential Low Density: With the expansion of MUSA, the land use of the property should change to accommodate residential development. Currently there is an inconsistency between the current designated land use and zoning. Current land use is OS — Open Space; however it is zoned R4 — Single Family Urban. A land use change to URL - Urban Residential Low density would allow urban residential lots and would ensure consistency between the City of Andover Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations. Review Criteria The Comprehensive Plan establishes criteria for review of amendment concerning a proposed land use change. The Planning and Zoning Commission should consider the amendments based on the following criteria: l . Conditions have change since the present land use designation was established such to warrant the proposed amendment or the present land use designation is in error. 2. The proposed land use is compatible with surrounding land uses and with the goals, objectives and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. There is capacity of public systems, facilities, and service to serve the proposed land use and capacity of these systems to serve other planned land uses is not adversely affected. 4. Agreement can be reached for the applicant of the proposed land use to pay for any increased capacity of public systems, facilities and services required to serve the proposed land use. 5. Potential impacts by the proposed land use on natural resources including vegetation, wetlands, floodplain and other natural feature's can be avoided or sufficiently mitigated as determined by City Council. 6. To ensure a transition or buffer between urban and rural residential zoning districts. Next Step in CPA Process If the proposed changes are approved by the City Council, city staff will make the necessary map changes in the Comprehensive Plan. The CPA will then be submitted to the Met Council for review and approval. Since the CPA land use change is less than 80 acres, the Met Council will conduct an administrative review. Staff hopes the CPA will be finalized no later than April 2015. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission hold a public hearing, consider the proposed CPA's and to make a recommendation of approval to the City Council. If approved by the City Council, this amendment will be forwarded to the Met Council for their approval. The proposed CPA's include: 1. To include 4.4 acres into the MUSA and the 2015 — 2020 Sewer Staging Plan, and 2. To change 4.4 acres of land from OS — Open Space to URL — Urban Residential Low Density Attachments Resolution Location Map MUSA Expansion and Sewer Staging Map Current Land Use Map Proposed Land Use Change Map Respect4LH!nVo n bmitted, Stephanie Cc: Shadow Ponds, LLC, 14015 S Sunfish Lk Blvd, Ramsey, MN 55304 CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER TO INCLUDE 4.4 ACRES INTO THE METROPOLITAN URBAN SERVICE AREA (MUSA), CHANGE 4.4 ACRES OF LAND FROM OS — OPEN SPACE TO URL - URBAN RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY FOR LAND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS TRACT A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 262 WHEREAS, the City of Andover has requested to include the 4.4 acres of property into the MUSA and the 2015 — 2020 sewer staging plan; and to change the land use designation from Open Space (OS) to Urban Residential Low Density (URL), and; WHEREAS, the property is not within the MUSA, and; WHEREAS, analysis of the City's sanitary sewer and water trunk system has determined that sufficient capacity exists to serve the subject property, and; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held pursuant to state statutes, and; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the amendment as requested, and; WHEREAS, the Council finds the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding land, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover has received the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and adopts the following amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, subject to review by the Metropolitan Council: 1. Include the 4.4 -acres into the MUSA and into the 2015 -2020 sewer staging plan; and change the land use of 4.4 acres from OS — Open Space to URL — Urban Residential Low Density. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this ` day of 2015. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Michelle Hartner, Deputy City Clerk ' Julie Trude, Mayor AN o Dbw CPA LOCATION MAP .1435 ]ASIA '0 16375 16730 Was 11520 Nu 4' 16325 14334 �U Z 1423 '3µf2 14313: uslz S COON CP Li �C2 1452 O "So3 145501 use QQ _ 61411 10� 14STHAVF 3170 - 1/521 L494 MAR 1003 Last 14422' 14t3'L49A IAA91 3552 3x1352* 3501 344: 3452 342 x00 1sfr1401 w O2 3455. L470 1471 1472 AMY 3021 �3W7 3595 i6t 0` , 347 - 1430 1450 iLAam C' 14&57 3001 3035' '30LS Mss "21p 2020 0017 2900 x50 2w 2039 x27 3571 Jo 111 tM " b xµ- U37 N __. 3150 oy. 1 4 . 2.:16447 _.1440 .. L4443 3102 3002 3x1 lit 3m2 AV f. 3340 (' -, 3434. Q N 1Y96; W1431; 11/34 14673 340 4�F* 644 M31 3503 3479' x410 �p4`b 414 1420;1434. 20x y 14320 0 ., 1�0 2, 34x 104 1423 01442L -. ]045 fA' 0 1A410 1411' 14A1x 0050 '0030 00x'0011 7201 00/4 2036 3034 ? 2� 142x1434 14 14224 N U223- 10039 6441 16069 54 100 A' 11305 ' 3005 LAM3' -14x0 14x1 �O0L if -3624. Spy. _ �,V' g WAVE .. 14372 .14379 _ 3400 3306' � 2100 I2As 3600 E *� 1434] MIA . j 14325 1411 - 3000 Iz20 14x1 W V :. CppNC F33µ 11140 ... 334 364 279 4 3334 ... �1& 14311 0311 3324 32U 3150 141ST 1N.u1K 249 14260 O - Last 3552 3x1352* 3501 344: 3452 342 x00 IL41M U117 ]af SazfO O 9519 3503 '3479 3435 � 1331 L2tl 73292 AVE 3001 3035' '30LS Mss "21p 2020 0017 2900 x50 2w 2039 x27 7312 242ND IN - 332z 14341 3102 3002 3x1 334 147Np qy 117NOW 1I7ND IN 644 M31 3503 3479' Q 354 354 3510 3502.34p x42 LAM LAM 3030 2 14234 U220 �, ... _ C >. _ _ .301/ X300/ 0050 '0030 00x'0011 7201 00/4 2036 3034 349 2� 142x1434 14 14224 N U223- 10039 6441 16069 54 100 A' 14 0227 S. 14223 14223 U21t <14217 •14034, 4�'rf5'`3315 14222 ULlf b MM MM M27 "Is 2059 2247 x35 -. 2Os J 14214 u2L O 3417 U2LS 1AO15 U2lS ... 14025 '1102714024' .:x11 3141 3400 11060. �;. _ _. 14215 40 A 1141 3391 3379 1400] 1426 142ND AVE 16200 14x0 14200 � 16206 � 14190 c- 142ND AVE 142ND AVE 742ND AVE 142ND AVE 1A197 - .ul4s LAM - 111µ C �141f) M3f.M21 MU 2M ZB56 "Kes 2924 470 _ 3sM 3532' 3512 use x34:342 I, 3100 L1µ 11101 in p ,..... ,. O _ L/Ul J1, FF 01117 ssl s3s MK 7W3 x47 16140 s 1414 14143 Q 14144 will 35353543: M23' 3503, 347 x27 I114 emma r9 141ST W 31 14129 :14136 14149 141ST 1N.u1K a 14133 3552 3x1352* 3501 344: 3452 342 x00 IL41M U117 CpC 14101 M ¢¢ 644 M31 3503 3479' ... 14024 . 14079 UOTN (111 140TH LN _ C >. !lam 1 yp�1y 429 o't (+may+ 10039 6441 16069 54 100 A' 1/04 ' /3635. 140 46 M:,. •14034, 4�'rf5'`3315 21 .] O 14033 1414µ71aµ2. ..__.... _._._ 14030 y-: w: ,!� r :3393 y- 1AO15 ... 14025 '1102714024' .:x11 3141 3400 11060. �;. _ _. 13007 - 1dkv, 1300: '3001'3201 -1 /OW .... ..•- �... 3347 3214 3001 .13000' M70 29M Mx 0022 2404 2210 14140 14134 J> MS7 MAI, 2025:2000 2003 3/672855 N 141$T AVE 141STAVF 14112 2000 2000 ULM a M30 13079 2034 2001 10020 Imes 14022 7Y00,. 14002 N Disclaimer: Maps and documents made available to the public by the City of Andover are not legally recorded maps or surveys and are not intended to be used as such. The maps and documents are created as part of the Geographic Information System (GIS) that compiles records, information, and data from various city, county, state and federal resources. w E Copyright © 2013 City of Andover, All Rights Reserved Printed 0310412015 s I I } 0 1 NDOVE Incorporated 1974 Sewer Staging Plan The Sewer Staging Plan divides undeveloped land within the Municipal Urban Service Area into five year growth stages based primarily on the proxmimity of municipal sewer and water The growth stages are intended to provide a reasonable estimate of urban growth to the year 2030 City of Andover -Planning Department 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 (763) 766 -6100 Map Date: December 2014 L E G E N D ---- MUSA Boundary 2005 -2010 ® 2010 -2015 2015 -2020 2020 -2025 _ 2025 -2030 Rural Reserve 0 2,500 5,060 10 000 0 025 0.5 Fait t 5 e Miles ANDOVE F CPA: 4.48 -Acre MUSA Expansion & Sewer Staging Plan ti y O 2 U C O O�.o�.i■143�a�Es■o w ■ ■■■ Legend ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ MUSA Boundary ® 2015 - 2020 Sewer Staging Z\ N G ; 142ND LN y C W ti 1� y y J W O Y '+ O�.o�.i■143�a�Es■o w ■ ■■■ Legend ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ MUSA Boundary ® 2015 - 2020 Sewer Staging Z\ N G ; 142ND LN y C W ti Location of CPA- 4.4 acres Change land use from CS to URL - Urban Residential N 2W W0 0 023 Ys r..1 1 Ibn I mch - 313a9 feel 1 Document Path. H tGisdata%Planningk pplanlprgectstFgum 2 4 Future Land Use.mxd Gross Residential Density Range by Land Use Land Use Density Range NDOVEI OA to 0.4 unit. per acM1 URL - Uban RaeidanBal LOw 1.75 to 3.6 unW peracm Incorporated 1974 -MM- Utban Re.Wmthl yMdll.n 3.6 to 6 Linea Mr.cra WO ma.lm9n lone/ y6.nhapa wr. PROPOSED a to 32 gnus per acn FUTURE. LAND USE MAP e xi. prw mvpueyvaa nY GN PnMery 'aa Liu puu w'9 Lino Wa Map 4xn Yx 1JA[umpgYUVYPW S.nyei nupn•oxPVOiaPaw'.fn aq Pruywp Nabe apaahyvowen[vnama5 ina[emani olme map urowua Samna ua iuGMWauye Frvevemmso cywma Wau <ppua'ne Glv p�M]pac. CITY Of Aneonr.Pknnlnp paWnmYnl In, CnWHoen BIM NW Anoevn, IIN 66IM(71317511-110a L E G E N D Land Use Acres % of Total RR- RUraI Re.M.n6al 10,84722 486% [,J URL - Ulan Re6lWntial LOW 3.08979 1375% �MM Urban R.aldediai Medlum 15359 33% URH -Urban R.siewyno High 111 Me 50% ® M- T'amRbnal RnMenlpl 14172 635% LC . unified Commercial 1461 001% -LCAID- LUnR.d CemmarclaMY.mum DeneBy 7942 w% NC - Nalyhbortluod Commaclal 27 461 12% GC - G.nend Colnmertlal 300 551 135% ® w- Tnreld..l CWWnn, l 16591 01% U Light IndueRial 75516 M% P -Pwhc 'Ifia -54 2.1% ®Wit - Rural Fit.,. 910404 435% ©0.9 -Open Spec. 1.3576 609% - AO- Agdcuiturai 934.2 419% Water 45693 21% _ Rlpht of way 2.162.29 969% MUSA Boundary ® City Limits 22,312.39 100 Gross Residential Density Range by Land Use Land Use Density Range �RR -R..1 R..Id.ndM OA to 0.4 unit. per acM1 URL - Uban RaeidanBal LOw 1.75 to 3.6 unW peracm PUD ma.lmum den.fiy 1.4 unit.,in -MM- Utban Re.Wmthl yMdll.n 3.6 to 6 Linea Mr.cra WO ma.lm9n lone/ y6.nhapa wr. - URH. UM.n RealdenU.l Hlgll a to 32 gnus per acn Joub manmum dfin.fiy 1. 14A unita W.W. AN, t -60VER* 4 1448 14484 14481 z9c+ari, ill' ; "� t 1447 14472 F- H 14469 1445 14460" � 14457 1444 14448 2 Q 14445 144M 14436 14433 14421 14424 14421 1441 14412 14409 143 14388 14391 14372 14379 14367 3216 a 334 143RD AVE \2 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 14197 14181 14165 111111111111in Legend LAND USE RR - Rural Residential O URL - Urban Residential Low RRR - Rural Reserve OS - Open Space CURRENT LAND USE 3150 3216 3021 �G 0 3065 SGO 3096 3060 2993 3018 I 2980 3061 3045 3035 1 3025 3015 1 3005 2955 2949 142ND LN 14242 3030 3014 3004 to 2950 14234 W 14227 x FQ, 14222 14216 :t 2949 14215 14208 14190 14165 3200 14183 14160 14184 ' 14168 2967 00 14141 O 14154 2970 14140 z 14124 N 0 75 150 300 450 Feet PROPOSED 9 1 f Y 11 E Land Use Change of 4.48 acres from IF MOVE OS - Open Spacel to URL - Urban Residential Low Dens. 1448 14484 14481 1447 14472 2993 W 14469 1445 14460 S4 14457 „, i 3021 C5 r 1444 14448 (j 14445 rx n 1443 i 14436 14433 14421 14424 14421 �x 0 � •,' :� , , :per z. 1 "''`', �„ s 3065 SG 441 14412 < 2955 14409 xw 142ND LN s 1�� 5• �, .. t a 14242 14388 143 14391 �,•. -3 ;a 3030 14372 14379 �' �,` 1+ N 'T�' •�, 3014 3004 rn 3018 2990 ` ta. �'t.s 14367 , . v ri ,.?€,'j.'° a. a �, •, = ti 3215 -- 143RD AVE 30 29 28 27 26 , 25 14197 14181 14165 14149 14133 14117 Legend QLand Use Change LAND USE O RR - Rural Residential URL - Urban Residential Low ORRR - Rural Reserve OS - Open Space 3096 / 3150 3216 1 3060 3061 3045 3035 1 3025 1 3015 1 3005 1 2955 2949 142ND LN 14242 3030 3014 3004 rn 2950 14234 K 14227 = ti = 14222 14216 2949 14215 14208 14190 14165 3200 14183 14160 14184 i 14168 2967 00 14141 O 14154 2970 14140 14124 A N 0 75 150 300 450 1i1111i111111 Feet