HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC August 7, 1990
..'
1Q c r I Fo5
~. ~
MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC & LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION
LOCAL NO. 320
./ ~.L.
0/7
affiliated with the
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA
3001 University Avenue S.E.-Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414..... FAX (612) 331.8948
August 1, 1990 Phone(612)331.3873;?::"-~.... " ;,.;, !.Ii' ,.",.-;:;;::-_
~1 n. ~," ~", I~.; "'J', "'"," ;"'," ',,' ~..
I'j ~,~ f. ! L;' c' ""
t. j . -:or. ~'," tli"'" ','; l~n~t
in'-':\!;(~"";'i~9~"11i. ~
.1 "... ..-,'., ~,~-,l.;o
...,.,..,...".....,...-,.,...'"v..__,~_____._..._ '" _..;.
Mr. James E. Schrantz
City Administrator
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W.
Andover, Mn 55304
CITY OF /\NDOVER
RE: 1991 Public Works Agreement
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
The following are the contract modifications requested on behalf of the membership enlployed
by the City of Andover in the above referenced bargaining unit.
I Please review these requests and be prepared to make a counter proposal at a meeting to be
scheduled at a mutually agreeable date and time when you contact our office.
1. A one year agreement effective January 1, 1991 through December 31, 1991.
2. Wages in Appendix A shall be adjusted to reflect the standard wage schedule for
rates in the Stanton Group V Communities for the calendar year 1991.
3. The Hospitalization/Major Medical Insurance shall be 100% employer paid for employees
and dependents.
4. The Employer shall provide a 100% premIUm paid dental plan for employees and
dependents.
5. Work performed on a recognized holiday shall be compensated for at the premium
rate of double time for all hours worked.
6. The members of this bargaining unit shall be granted an additional paid floating
holiday.
7.
A Working Out of Classification Article shall be established and included in the
agreement that compensates any employee required by the Employer to do the work
of a higher compensated employee, that employee's wage rate for the duration of
the assignment.
, '.
.
'-../
United To Protect
~
~
~-J Page 2
8. Any employee assigned by the Employer to on-call duty shall be compensated a
minimum of seven hours additional straight time pay for the duration of the on-
eall assignment. This assignment is currently being rotated on a weekly basis.
9. An Appendix B shall be included in the agreement that compensates employees for
specialized licenses as follows:
1. Sewer and Water License "D" - $.15 per hour
2. Sewer and Water License "C" - $.30 per hour
3. Tree Inspector - $.30 per hour
4. Weed Inspector - $.30 per hour
10. The Employer shall establish a deferred compensation plan and shall match the
contributions made by any employee to a maximum allowed by Minnesota State Statute.
11. Employee benefits included under Article XX of the Agreement shall be spelled out
and listed by Article in the master agreement. (i.e. Vacation, Sick Leave,
and Holiday, etc.).
12. All other items to remain as presently in effect.
13. Teamsters Local No. 320 reserves the right to alter and/or modify demands during
the course of negotiations.
Sincerely,
TEAMSTERS LOCAL NO. 320
~/c#~
Business Agent
LMB/jmm
OPEIU-#12
cc: Ray Sowada (3)
r '
'-../
.- '\
o
, .
,H
. :.
~
;
1lJ c Co-
THE PILLSBURY COMPANY 1/7
/JA ~ ~~tZ>f1"~
"
~J~-1-~
0","
FORM .361
,'",'.
""-"',ltJ.
..;. '." ~ ;'.. .,
I
I
,
I
I
I
~..; c.. .,
Ii cc.
<6/7
:re CVI/t!14f~
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre. 230 East Fifth Street. St. Paul. MN.'5510l 612 291-6359
c "-
'--)
August 1, 1990
--"'-'-"
r~'. I'~~' ~" "i< """'D
j . f ~"" .,
I ., r~' 1.1 ~'" ~'" ~
1 "'::r~':'S"" 'J/ t!,..1I
~ ~ r"-- ........"- ".--.,,- ~ll
g \i /\lj(~ 31990 I ~
.. ~",. ~...
.Mr. James E. Schrantz, Administrator
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
CITY OF ANDOVER
Metropolitan Council staff are currently reviewing a request by Anoka County Parks and
Recreation Department to have the limitation on development lifted for a portion of Anoka
County Candidate Landfill Site Q located in the Cities of Andover and Coon Rapids.
The Parks Department is proposing to build a 42' x 105' unheated storage building in the buffer
area along the north side of the Site, on property it currently uses as an open, fenced storage
yard. This building will be used to store park trucks and equipment.
As you may know, any proposed development in a candidate site, or buffer area, must be
approved by both the Metropolitan Council, and the County, No definite dates for Council
committee action, or County approval, have been established. However, it is anticipated that
Council committee review will take place during August. Therefore, if you have any comments
on this proposal, please submit them in writing to me for inclusion in the staff report.
If you have any questions, or concerns please feel free to call me at 291-6319.
Sincerely,
~~-qJ ^~ GI<>>~~y7
Thomas R. Caswell, Planner
Solid Waste Division
~-J
~
~ Ha: IIi tjll
~\r~-~]U
-
Ccf'Y
CITY OF ANDOVER
-w-o D
J','~
<:.<;
8j1 /10
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE
THE COON RAPIDS PLANNING COMMISSION
-----------------------------------
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the c60n Rapids Planning commission
hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to the
Council on the following matter:
will
City
CASE: 90-66
ITEM: Preliminary Plat
PETITIONER: Homart Community centers, Inc.
LOCATION: Round Lake Boulevard and Northdale Boulevard
The petitioner requests. preliminary plat approval for the
Riverdale Crossing project.
The property may be described legally as:
.......
The South 210.60 feet of the Northeast Quarter
Northwest Quarter, section 5, Township 3l, Range 24;
of the
EXCEPTING FROM ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL, LAND NOW DESCRIBED
AS Parcell, ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO.
10, according to the plat on file and of record in the
Office of the Registrar of Titles of Anoka County,
Minnesota.
The Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, section 5,
Township 31, Range 24, except the following described land:
Commencing at a point 33 feet South and 33 feet West of the
Northeast corner thereof, measured on lines parallel to the
North and East line thereof, and proceeding thence South and
parallel to said East line for a distance of 120 feet; and
proceeding thence West and parallel to said North line for a
distance of 366 feet; and proceeding thence North and
parallel to said East line for a distance of 120 feet; and
proceeding thence East to the point of commencement.
EXCEPTING FROM ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL, LAND NOW DESCRIBED
AS Parcell, ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO.
10, according to the plat on file and of record in the
Office of the Registrar of Titles of Anoka County,
Minnesota.
\.)
1313 COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD, COON RAPIDS. MINNESOTA 55433.5397
(612) 755.2880. FAX (612) 780.G~?1
.,
Public Hearing Notice
Planning Case 90-66
Page 2
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter
of Section 5, Township 31, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota
described as follows: Commencing at a point 33 feet South
and 33 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof, measured on
lines parallel to the North and East line thereof, and
proceeding thence South and parallel to said East line for a
distance of 120 feet; and proceeding thence West and parallel
to said North line for a distance of 366 feet; and proceeding
thence North and parallel to said East line for a distance of
120 feet; and proceeding thence East to the point of
commencement.
EXCEPTING FROM ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL, LAND NOW DESCRIBED
AS Parcell, ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO.
10, according to the plat on file and of record in the
Office of the Registrar of Titles of Anoka County,
Minnesota.
Said'hearing will take place on Thursday, August 16, 1990 at the
Coon Rapids Council Chambers beginning at 7:30 p.m. All
interested persons are invited to attend and to be heard. You.
may call Kevin Ringwald at 780-6430 if you have any questions.
Donna Naeve, Chairman
Coon Rapids Planning Commission
'l
~
)
, ,
l J
- ~ AUDITO S
I ~-
L --1--
I
~IONl
~\~,
~
,. ,
'"' "'
~ 0 ,.., ~ '"
0 J ~ .J 0
0 >- :> 0
r Q >- '" 0 $
u '" o! n: z >-
'" J '" 0 0':
0 ~____2_
,. ,. ,. " ~ '"
0 ~ ~ <.> ~ .J ~ 0 '"' '"' ~
0 '"' '" '" '"
~ ~ ~ Z m " u 0 >-
'" u ., J '" a. '"
w u 0 ., w "' w >- a.
u '" 0 ~
-< >- <t U 0 .J :J '" <t a.
. J N W ::> W 0 '" z ::> 0 ::> 0
m ., N >- n: $ > ;:> ,- Vi a: 0 a.
~J- - --- --- - ~r- --- --._-
\
,--j
l
~
J
Cl
I.u
..\::"
o
o
f5
NO. 71
P4RK
(UNDEVE LOpt D)
SUB.
NO.
I ~6
"OAO
010. ''I
)..,
. .
,o~s
[:.\,)0\ ,
IAq
,\0.
PETITIONER: HOMART, INC.
PLANNING CASE: 90 - 66
~
NgRTH
SALE
LOCATION: ROUND LAKE &
NORTHDALE BOULEVARDS
DATE: AUGUST 16, 1990
:~)
DATE: August 7, 1990
1
~
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Public Hearing Legislation
July Building Report
Memo from Howard Koolick (8/2/90)
Sketch Plan for Kenneth Heil
Letter from Gerry Sikorski (7/27/90)
Letter from John Davidson, TKDA (7/18/90)
Coon Creek watershed Meeting Agenda (7/23/90) & Minutes (7/9/90)
Memo from Howard Koolick (7/27/90)
Letter from John Davidson, TKDA (7/23/90)
Copy of Ordinance 92
Copy of Ordinance 10Q
Regular City Council Minutes (7/17/90)
Park & Recreation Minutes (7/19/90)
Special City Council Minutes (7/18/90)
Land Use Advisory Committee Agenda (7/25/90) & Minutes (7/1l/90)
planning & Zoning Commission Minutes (7/10/90)
Feasibility Report Update, 90-5, TKDA
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT
AGENDA.
- -\
'-~
THANK YOU.
, '.
j- .. >--' ~
. :: ;::.: :~,~ ".~., ,:';'~ .
';';':' : ,..::'".:' ,~~~-',.:.~:::::i:.:~.i:::~';.'
":;',":. '., :'~~";.t~:: -.:
'.. "
",':;fY~(\
..
, "
, '
~. '1.' .
.~/. Ch. 550
.;. y) -,Y'1\l, MEETINGS OF PUBLIC BODIES-GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES
t. ~'~t. ' ' CHAPTER 550
~,..p Alf'v S,F. No. 1874
j~}f) \i\l v AN M:r relaUnl to meellng~ of public bodlu; rovernment data pradlcu; dennlnr final
I dl~po~ltlon 01 a dl~dpllnar)' action rClardlnr IX!rlonnel recordl: \'lIaklnr clear that meetlngA
1,",\1 may not be clo.ed on the bMls oC dam c\as.lflcallon ltalute.; provldlnr an exception to the
open meetlnr law Cor preliminary dlsellMlone concerning allegstlona 01 mlAconduct Ilgaln~t
government employees or evaluatlonl DC lovernment employee.; amending Mlnnelota Stat-
uws 1988. .ecllon. 18.(3, lubdlvhlon 2; and '71.705, by adding luWlv!.lona.
10 Ce.
'6/7/7/)
76th LEGlSLATURE
~-)
.
~:
~
~
,. I ,;.... "~'
,. ,
'.:.F~'~.\', ~ ':: ::- I ~', I ,I.
~;?j'f:,;:,": X~7'::
, :
I,
'HEALTH IN5URANCE-LONG-TERM CARE
.'
".
,', .'
CHAPrER 551
, '
. ,
.,
'. . . . ,R.F. No. 2474 '. '..' , ... .
." , '. I . I'. '. ~" . .'
+N M:r relaUl\f to In8ur~cei lonf-term ~i modlfrlnr the dennlUon ot .medlcally p~e~rl~
' long-term CAre; allow I", addlUonal Ueented hulth care providers to JI1'eplll'e planl ot eare;
, nrulallnf ...e..mente; recu1atlnr Ullcellatlon.; amendlnr MlnnellOta Statutea !tSS. lee.
I . lion. 62,U6, '''I>dlvlllon. 2, " 5. and 8; 82A.'8, .UJ,,!tvl.lon 3, alid by addlnr a '"bdlvl.lo";
..;., and 62A.56i MlnnttlOta Statute. 1989 Supplement, ~on S2A,48. .ubdlvl..on 1,'
I '.' ~.
. . .. 'I.
",BE IT ENACTED BY THELEGISLA.TURE OF THE STATE "OF MINNESOTA:
' Section 1. . Minnesota StAtutes 1988, section 62.A.46, subdivision 2, Is amended to read:
. Sulld. 2. LONG.TERM CARE POLICY. "Long-term care ,policy" mesns an individu-
al or group policy, certificate, subscriber contract, or other evidence ot coverage that
Provides benefits for 1II9di9QlI~' prescribed long-tenn care, including nursing facility
lervices and home care services, pursuant to the requirements of s~ctions 62A.46 to
FA,56. A long-term care policy must contAin a designation specifying whether the policy
.. a long-wrm care policy AA or A and a caption stAting that the commissioner has
:C~~lished two categories of long-term, care insurance and the, minimun,l stAndards lor
~.Sections 62A.46, 62A.48, and 62.A.52 to 62A.56 do not apply to a lo'ng-tetin care poiicy
'"'lued to (a) an employer or employers or to the trustee ol a fund estAblished by an
e):1~loyer where only employees Or retirees, and dependents of employees or retire ell, are
e~glble for coverage Or (b) to a' labor union or similar employee organization.. The
AddUlo"1 In ltXl ....,ndl..lttl by undtrlfnt; d.r.Uon. by ,trlhMt- 811
O:L4Ir'l,t~og,Sorv,'~ _
:J
1--=' _ 12t::;$
." "~"'.
'.
, .
,-J
.,~
CITY of ANDOVER
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor & City Council
COPIES TO: Department Heads
FROM: David Almgren
DATE: Auqust 1, 1990
REFERENCE: .TTIT,V 199O Mnnthly Rllililing Repnrt
I hereby submit the following report of the Building Department for the Month
of July 1990:
BUILDING PERMITS
28 Residential
2 Additions
10 Garages
4 Remodeling/Finishing
3 Pole Bldgs./Sheds
3 Swimming Pools
2 Chimneys/Stoves/Fireplaces
1 Structural Change
20 Porches/Decks
73
APPROXIMATE VALUATION
$ 2,740,000.00
38,100.00
60,000.00
28,500.00
5,200.00
33,000.00
1,000.00
10,000.00
62,892.00
$ 2,978,692.00
PERMITS
73 Building Permits
1 Curb Cut Permit
1 Renewal
30 Heating Permits
2 Heating Repair
25 Hook Up (sewer)
29 Plumbing Permits
15 Plumbing Repair
29 Pumping Permits
6 Septic Permits
2 Septic Repair
25 Water Meter Permit
29 Certificates of Occupancy
28 Contractor's License
25 Administrative Fees (sewer)
25 SAC Retainage Fee
17,671.02
5.00
168.88
635.00
20.00
625.00
1,475.69
222.00
72.50
150.00
50.00
1,250.00
116.00
700.00
375.00
150.00
Total Building Department Income--July 1990
Total Building Department Income--YTD 1990
Total Valuation--July 1990
Total Valuation--YTD 1990
$ 23,686.09
$ 142,216.31
$ 2,978,692.00
$17,150,694.00
:~)
July 1990 Monthly Report
August 1, 1990
Page Two
Total Number of Houses YTD (1990) - 172
Total Number of Houses YTD (1989) - 211
Total Number of Houses 1989 - 341
Total Number of Houses 1988 - 356
D~
David
DA/jp
'j
J
.~~:::.-""'--
~ c' ,
~ {0\
.\~~ .
""-
'->:"'-~-<'::'
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Howard D. Koolick, Finance Director
August 2, 1990
Moodv's Credit Report
Attached is a copy of Moody's credit report for the recent bond
sale. I thought you may find it informative.
~
"
-
:JMoody's Municipal Credit Report
Andover, Minnesota
June 20, 1990
New Issue
General Obligation/Special Tax
sale:
52.500,000
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds,
Series 1990 A
date:
Sold June 19
Moody's rating: Baal
opinion:
Continuing investment in new infrastructure contrib-
utes to above average levels of indebtedness, and
sizable reliance on temporary borrowing also poses
risk. These factors require continued monitoring.
Strong tax base growth, a stable regional economy,
above average wealth levels, and satisfactory
finances arc also noted in the medium grade rating
assigned.
key facts:
General Obligation Debt Outstanding:
Debt Burden:
Debt per Capita:
Payout, Ten Years:
Special Assessment Debt as % of
Direct Debt:
Special Assessment Collections,
FY]989:
$29,743,000
8.3%
$3,738
82.7%
92.6%
96.8%
Temporary Bonds as ex.> of Gross
Bonded Debt:
50.6%
update:
Since our last report dated June 22, 1989, financial
results for fiscal year 1989 have become available
and show a modest decline in the General Fund
Undesignated General Fund Balance
as % of General Fund Revenues,
1989:
Population Growth, 1970-80:
1980-88:
Andover per Capita Income as % of
State'sPCl,I987:
Moody's Rating.
General Obligation State Aid
Road Bonds:
32.6%
138.2%
7.5%
97.5%
A
balance. The city issued $110,000 of equipment cer-
tificates in December 1989.
analysis:
As a rapidly growing, primarily residential suburb in
the Twin Cities area, Andover has issued debt fre-
quently to finance infrastructure expansion. This
growth is expected to continue, including some com-
mercial development, although at a slower pace.
Building permit levels have declined in the past sev-
eral years and population growth has also slowed.
Yearly growth in full valuation has been strong,
, '\
'J
rJ __=
~...........~;
however, over the past six years. Resident per capita
incomes here are about the same as the state average.
Unemployment rates are low reflecting the strength
of the regional economy of the Twin Cities metropol-
itan area where most residents commute to work.
Infrastructure needs tied to growth in the city have
resulted in a debt load well above average. Payment
'2
General Obllgatlon!SpKlal Tax
June 20, 1990
Andover, Minnesota
')
'J
~.
of debt service benefits from substantial special
assessment support; special assessment collections
arc satisfactory, aided by the city's policy that devel-
opers prepay 15% of total improvement costs before
issuance of bonds. The cash balance in the city's
Debt Service Fund was $12.1 million at December
31, 1989. The current offering, which is expected to
be paid from special assessments. will refinance
Series 1987 A bonds originally issued to fund utility
and street improvements. Current bond proceeds will
be combined with prepaid assessments already col-
lected to repay the Series 1987 A bonds at final
maturity on August 1, 1990. At the present time, 50%
of the city's direct debt is composed of temporary
bonds which carry balloon maturities in 1990 and
1991. This heavy reliance on temporary debt leaves
the city vulnerable to development cycles and poses
potential risk if future refinancings cannot be
arranged, for whatever reason. at maturity. Officials
report that, based on assessment payments to date,
substantial portions of the remaining temporary
bonds will need to be refinanced at maturity.
Andover's finances remain satisfactory. The General
Fund balance is ample, representing about 32.6% of
General Fund revenues in 1989; these balances pro-
vide insurance against delays in state aid, a major
revenue source. Due to statewide state aid reductions,
the city received $75,000 less in state aid than budg-
eted in 1990, which city officials report will be
absorbed with each deparunent. Property taxes are
the other primary revenue source and collections
remain favorable.
At this time, we are also confrrming the A rating on
the city's general obligation state aid street bonds.
State aid payments used to pay debt service on these
bonds are being received as anticipated.
~.
"
'--)
. ""'\
,-
, )
.~.
General Obllgatlon/Speclal Tax
Andover, Minnesota
June 20,1990
3
details 0' bond
sale:
Legal Name of Issuer: City of Andover,
Minnesota.
Security: G.O., UL T., with special assessment also
pledged.
Date ot Bonds: July 1, 1990.
Denomination: $5,000.
Maturity 7/l ($ 000)
Year: 1993.
Amount: $2,500.
Average Ufe of Issue: 3.0 years.
Interest Payable: Beginning January 1, 1991; Janu-
ary I and July 1 thereafter.
Call Features: Beginning July I, 1992 at par plus
accrued interest.
Registrar: To be determined.
Paying Agent: To be determined.
Delivery: Within 40 days after sale.
Bond Counsel: Holmes and Graven, Minneapolis.
FlnanclalOfflcer: Howard Koolick, Finance
Director,
Advisors: Burke and Hawkins, Coon Rapids.
Auditor: George M. Hansen Company. P.A., Minne-
apolis (FY 1989).
de'alls 0' las'
comparable
sale:
Date of Sale: June 20, 1989.
Amount: $3,200,000.
Interest Cost:
6.7591%
rating hIstory:
August 1984:
June 1976:
Baal.
Baa
General Obligation State AId Street Bonds,
August 1984:
A
analyst: Dan Aschenbach
(212) 553-0880
,- ....
J The infonnation herein has been obtained from ~()UTCes believed to be accurate and reliable, but because of the po"sibility ofhurnan and mechanical error, its accuracy or completcne.';s j" not
guaranteed. Moody's ralings are opinions, not recommendations to buy or sell, and their accuracy is not guaranteed. ^ rating should be weighed solely as one factor lUlIn investment decision,
and you should make yonr own study and evaluation of any issuer who!ie !iccurities or debt obligations you con!iider buying or selling. MO!it issuers of corporate honds, municipal boods and
notes, preferred stock, and commcn:ia! p"pcr which:He ral\'d by r-.1()ocly'~ Invc..10f'S Service, Inc. have, prior to receiving the rating, agreed to pay a ree to Moody's ror me appraisal and filling
service.ct. The rce ranges rrom $1 ,OlXllo ~125,OOn.
Copyright (!;) 1990 hy Moody'~ InVl:slnrs Sl:r\"in'. Inl". l'\lhli..hing and c:tcculivc offices at 99 Church Street, New York, NY 10007
4.
General Obllgallon/Speclal Tax
June 20. 1990
Andover, Minnesota
~J
'\
debt factors:
Debt Statement as of 6/19/90 ($ 000)
Bonded debt outstanding [j]
Current offering (6/19190) III
Gross direct and direct net debt
Overlapping debt
Overall net debt
Amount
$27,243
2,500
$29,743
7,982
$37,725
m Includes $710,000 general nhlig;lllClIl !>lalC aid street bonds.
@OnAugusl 1,1990, S...:ri...:... IllS? ..\ hl)lhl... JIllhe amount of S5,OOO,OOO will be refinanced with currCnl uffering and $2.5 million of prepaid special assessments
already collected
For additional inIonnatinn pkJSC r..:f,,:r \0 \1onJy's I ~HW Municipal and Govcmmcnl Manual. page 3132.
Security: G.O., ULT., with special assessments also
pledged.
Defaults: No record of default found.
Debt Ratios Rate of Retiremenlill
Net Per % Median Principal Amount %of '""\
Debt Capita Median [j] F,V. (%)ill Amount Due ($ 000) Total
Direct 52,940 S572 6.6 1.4 In 5 years $ 8,958 50.0
Overall 3,738 %7 8.3 2.5 In 10 years 14,803 82.7
OJ For cili..:.. wnh pllplllalloll 1 O.(KI(j.~~,q(N
III Oondcd deht only, aflcr March 30, 1990. Excludes the 1991 maturity of
Series 1988 A.
Use of Proceeds: To refinance Series 1987 A
bonds originally issued to temporarily fund assessa-
ble public improvements in the city; current proceeds
will be combined wiLh 52.5 million of cash to repay
Series 1987 A bonds on malLlrily August 1,1990.
Structure: Serials; above average rate of retirement.
generally level debt service through 1996, declining
thereafter to 2005.
CIP/Future Borrowing: No formal CIP plan; city
expects 10 issue $200,000 equipment certificates and
$1 million of general obligation bonds to fund special
assessment projects in the eity in 1990.
administrative
factors:
Form of Government: Mayor-council, elecled to
four-year overlapping terms. City administrator,
ckrk, and treasurer arc' bo:ml-appointcd.
Public Employees: 25; all eligible employees par-
ticipate in sUlte's Public Employees' Retirement
Association.
Leglslallon/Referenda/L1l1gatlon: No significant
litigation reported.
"
)
'\
... I..
1
,~/
General Obllgatlon/Speclal Tax
Andover, Minnesota
June 20, 1990
5
property
valuation and
tax data:
\-
Andover
State
Assessmenl/ Indicated
Collection Assessed Market % Tax Rate! Levy % Current
Year Valuation (000) Value (000) Change $1,000 A. V. ill (000) Collected
1987-88 $70,487 $324.813 18.7 $30.766 $ 996 98.2
1988-89 9.215 394,870 21.6 27.425 1,006 98.4
1989-90 8,180 453,117 14.8 rn 28.846 1.150 In process
[I For property taxes payable in 1989. assessed value is replaced by gross lax caplcity, which is ea1cullted by applying differcnt percentages to the estimated
market value of property based on its property class. Tax capacity depicts what portion of a property's valuc is tuablc. Gross lax capacity is multiplied by the
tax capacity rate, instead of mill rate, to detennine the tax plyable. For prnperty taxes payable in 1990, grm:s tax capacity ha!! been changed to nellax capacity
with the first S68,OOO of a home.<ilead property placed at, lower percent3gc of e.,timatcd market value than the prior year.
m Including county and school district, overall net tax capacity rate in 1989 in Andover was 90:82%.
1989 Full Valuation:
1989 Equalization Rate: m
$453,117.000
90.0%
Average Annual Growth F.V., 1983-88:
1989 F.V. per Capita:
[J] State Department of Revenue sales ralio.
10.3%
$44,907
Largest Taxpayers: City is primarily residential.
No single taxpayer represents more than 1 % of total
tax capacity.
% of 1989 Gross Tax Capacity
by Property Class, Residential:
Commercial and Industrial:
Agriculture:
84.0%
12.8%
12%
economic
factors:
,J
',-..
Population: Andover
Year
1970
1980
1988
Population
3,940
9,387
10,090
%
Change
138.2
7.5
Source: u.s. CCI\:-;\l!ii IlUleall.
25 miles north of Twin Cities.
37.0 square miles
273 per square mile
Locallon:
Area:
Population Density:
Per Capita Income
Andover
MinnesoUl
1979
$7,367
7,450
1987
$11,979
12,281
% Change
62.6
64.8
k; % of State's
PCI, 1987
97.5
'6
General Obllgatlon/Speclal Tax
June 20. 1990
Andover, Minnesota
----,
1
'~J
Population and Housing Characteristics: Andover
City State U.S.
1980 1980 1980
Population:
Median agc 23.3 29.2 30.0
% school agc 32.9 21.2 20.9
% working agc 55.3 59.4 60.7
% 65 and ovcr 1.4 11.7 11.3
No. pcrsons/household 3.8 2.7 2.75
Income:
Mcdian family incomc $26,621 $21,185 $19,908
% below povcrty level 4.0 9.5 12.5
Pcr capita income $7,367 $7,452 $7,313
Housing:
% owner occupicd 91.6 71.6 64.4
% built before 1939 4.6 33.3 26.1
% built since last ccnsus 63.1 25.2 25.9
Owncr occupied mcdian valuc $67,400 $54,300 $4 7 ,300 --..,
Median gross rcnt $334 $236 $243
Occupicd housing units 2,469
Source: u.s. Census Bureau
Labor Market Characteristics: Anoka County
Labor Total % Unemployed
Year Force Employment County Stale U.S.
1983 113,360 104,988 7.4 8.2 9.6
1984 121,775 115,845 4.9 6.3 7.5
1985 121,195 115,107 5.0 6.0 7.2
1986 124,555 118,818 4.6 5.3 7.0
1987 129,095 123,164 4.6 5.4 6.2
]988 133,128 128,241 3.7 4.0 5.5
1989 135,374 129,764 4.\ 4.3 5.3
3190 [j] 135,997 129,131 5.0 5.4 5.4
. Source; DcpartlllCl1l of l.ahor,IJur..:au llf l.ahoT Stalistics.
[j] Monthly dala llOL seasOl\ally adjuslt.:d.
flnanctal facfors: Operating Funds Financial Performance (fiscal years ended 12/31 $ 000) III
:~
Rcvcnucs
Expenditures
Opcrating surplus (dcficit) rn
OJ General and Debt Service hlluh; (TlIlhlified accrual method of accounting).
III General Fund only.
Q] Major portion uf incn:.asc rCnCC1S alldilioll of Special Assessment Fund as part of Debt Service Fund.
,
1987
$2,061
1,707
185
%
1988111 1989 Change
$6,295 $7,669 21.8
4,222 5,452 29.\
(78) (117) 50 l
,.
'\
'..... ___J
,
'-...
._)
General Obllgatlon/Speclal Tax
June 20, 1990
7
Andover, Minnesota
1989 Sources of Revenue
Special assessments
Property taxes
Intergovernmental
Licenses, permits, charges for services
Other
% 1989 Ilems of Expendllure
51.7 Debt service
14.7 Public safety
I 1.8 General government
4.1 Public works
17.7 Other
%
58.5
12.9
11.8
5.4
11.4
General Fund Financial Position ($ 000)
1987 1988 1989
Cash and investmenLs $800 $804 $699
Operating loans
Other currelllliabilities 83 103 147
Year-end cash SUlJllus $717 $701 $552
Receivables $ 96 $ 31 $ 36
Fund balance $814 $732 $615
Undesignated fund balance 799 689 615
7824ROI .
JKDA
TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
July 18, 1990
2500 AMERICAN NA TlONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 551 01
6121202-4400
FAX 6121202-0093
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, MllUlesota
Re: Andover, MllUlesota
Commission No. 9140-000
Dear Mayor and Council:
The following is confinnation of engineerlllg matters discussed at the regular Council Meeting of
July 17, 1990:
1. Kensington Estates 6th Addition - Change Order No.1 and Change Order No. 2~o
City Project 90-3, Commission No. 9695-02 .
Mr. Windschitl, the developer, presented a 6 lot plat for extending 142nd Avenue NW
approxllnately 300 feet easterly from Kenslllgton Estates 3rd Addition. TIle plat was in
accordance with the preliminary plat approved Febmary, 1988, as Kensington Estates
3rd Addition. Final platting has been phased as Kensington 3rd, 4th (not ftled), 5th and
now 6th Additions.
Mr. Davidson did review the alternate methods of providlllg utilities, including sanitary
sewer, waternlains, stonn drainage and street llnprovements.
A. Change Order No.1
Change Order No. I was presented to the Council for approval and relates to
extra depth of sanitary sewer due to a revised grading plan submitted to City
stafffor approval. The deeper sewer (Alternate Bid awarded to 0 & P
Contracting March 20, 1990) does provide depth to serve lots in Kensington 6th
Addition south through 141st Lane NW in lieu of the origlllal sewer design
north to 142nd Lane NW.
B, Change Order No.2
Change Order No.2 provides for all costs related to extension of sanitary sewer
and water, street surfacing, curb and gutter III 142nd Avenue NW to serve the
six lots III Kenslllgton Gth Addition.
~J
The addition of Change Orders Nos. 1 and 2 does not exceed the allowable 25% increase
in project cost allowed without rebidding the project.
~
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, Minnesota
July 18, 1990
Page Two
Council Action
The Council, by resolution, did approve the plat of Kensington Estates 6th Addition
subject to conditions as follows:
A. All City developer contract requirements are met.
B. The developer recognizes the potential 200 foot clear zone requirements to be
imposed by outside goverrunental agencies at the closed landfill site easterly of
Kensington Estates 6th Addition.
C. The developer understands the potential loss of lots due to restrictions which
may be imposed to the balance of the original preliminary plat of Kensington
Estates 3rd Addition.
The Council received the petition for improvements and authorized work by Change
Order to the 90-3 City Project, Conunission No. 9695-02. .
".
The Council approved Change Order No.1 for Alternate Bid under Contract to 0 & P
Construction, City Project 90-3, Commission No. 9695-02 in the amount of $10,355.19.
The Council approved Change Order No.2 for extension of utilities and street with
concrete curb and gutter for Kensington Estates 6th Addition, 142nd Avenue NW in the
estimated amount of $23,354.01.
2. Commercial Park Pond, City Project 89-24, Commission No. 8840-041
The Council approved [mal payment #2 to Moser Construction in the amount of $162.00.
Final project contract cost was $10,555.
3. Lot 1, Watt's Garden Acres, City Project 90-6, Commission No. 9748
Report of Bid Opening was presented to the Council which indicated that Part I (only)
low bid was Ro-So Contracting in the amount of$37,175.75.
Parts I and II combined (Alternate Bid) low bidder was Kadlec Excavating Company of
Mora, Inc., in the amount of $48,660.25.
Council Action
The Council withheld the award to a continued meeting on July 18, 1990 or July 31,1990
until the owner/s, Batson, et al, have been contacted for easement acquisition.
"-
o
4.
Crosstown Watermain Extension, City Project 90-15, Commission No. 9777
The Report of Bid Opening W<lS presented to the Council. 111C low bidder was Volk
Sewer and Water, Inc., in the amount of $30,200.20.
"
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, Minnesota
July 18, 1990
') Page 111ree
'-./
Council Action
The Council awarded the bid to Volk Sewer and Water, Inc., in the amount of
$30,200.20.
The Engineer was excused at approximately 12:30 AM, July 18, 1990.
JLD:j
,
)
.~
AGENDA
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS
July 23,1990
7:30 p.m.
1.
Call to Order
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Open Mike
4. Approval of Minutes
5. Reports
6. Policy Agenda
a. Mission Statement
b. Policy: Board of Managers
7. Permit Agenda
a. Majestic Oaks South
b. Bunker Lake Commercial
c. Rustic Acres
d. Andover Project 90-15
e. Andover Project 90-6
f. Blaine Project 90-6
g. Coon Rapids Project 90-17
8. Informational Agenda
a. Budget: Assumptions, Goals, and Themes
b. DRAFT Budget detail
c. Logo & Letterhead
9. New Business
10. Adjourn
~
76
ere.
~Y?o
(C(Q)[P)V
In C;1:l11! -
nF~;o 7D
~-"".-
CITY OF' I' N!')f)VF.R
".
CCWD ~Iinlltes: JuLy 9. 1990
DRAFT
o
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS' MEETING
July 9, 1990
The Board of ManR~ers of the Coon Creek Watershed District held
their regular meeting on July 9, 1990 at the Bunker Hills
Activities Center.
Present: Bob Boyum, Reggie Hemmes, Eldon Hentges, LuEllen
Richmond, Paul Williams.
Staff:
Tim Kelly, Ed Mathiesen, Harold Scheff
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:34 p.m.
2. Approval of the Agenda:
Kelly noted two handouts: 1) A revised cash balances report, 2)
Per Diem claim vouchers. Williams asked to have one item addedj
Lee's wrecking in Blaine. Hemmes asked for an update on three
items: 1) Easement and status of Blaine project on London Rd.,
(2) Update on Round lake home owners concerns on lake levels,' ,
(3) Scheduling of personnel meeting. Moved by Richmond, Seconded
by Williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes,
Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
3. Open Mike:
Stan Knoll addressed the board expressing concern about
maintenance of ditch 41 and the work the district contracted. Mr.
Knoll stated that an acquaintance had bid on the job and read
from a bid document the scope of the job emphasizing that the
work in the bid document was not what was done. Mr. Knoll then
asked how the work was approved by the District's engineer.
Ed Mathiesen responded that variations from the bid document were
the result of on-site decisions not to grade portions of the
ditch's banks because of soil type and concerns about erosion and
re-establishment of vegetation.
Bob Boyum proposed to have the project site supervisor for
Montgomery and associates call Mr. Knoll and explain his
reasoning. Concern was expressed that this was not a proper
resolution to the Mr. Knoll's concern.
Hemmes proposed inspection of the ditch according to how the
project was conducted. Tim Kelly then asked Mr. Knoll if it
would be acceptable if the District handled this as a complaint
which would require the District to: (1) inspect the site, (2)
photograph and record findings, (3) Follow-up with a letter to
Mr. Knoll and a report to the Board. Mr. Knoll was agreeable.
.~
4. Approval of Minutes:
(TI.D '\ i 1111 tes: ,Ju I y 9, 1990
DRAFT
~J
The Board reviewed the minutes from the June 25, 1990 meeting.
Richmond moved the minutes be approved as presented, seconded by
Williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
5a Financial Report
Kelly presented the fund balances as of June 30, 1990. Mr.
Hemmes stated a desire to have a policy on interest to the
general fund on money loaned from the general fund to ditch
accounts.
The Board reviewed the bills presented for payment. Boyum raised
the issue of the appropriateness of paying the Thomas Contracting
bill for repair of Ditch 41 until Mr. Knoll's concern is
resolved. Approval of the bills except the bill for Thomas
Contracting were moved by Boyum and seconded by Richmond. Motion
carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and
Williams) and no nays. The bills to be paid are as follows:
Check TO Amount
3176 Lake Restoration 2,970.00 '.
3177 Gunn & Gunn, LTO 1,346.15
3180 Rick Johnson 598.13
3181 Blaine Office Partners 496.12
3182 COP, Inc. 138.47
3183 Tim Kelly 114.26
3184 U.S. West 62.56
3185 AT & T .28
5b Staff Report
Kelly presented the staff report noting the presence of the State
Auditor and discussions with city staffs on the qistrict's review
of utilities. Kelly indicated that utilities could best be
reviewed at the same time as the development so that differences
can be handled at the same time.
Policy Agenda
6a Policy: Holidays: Kelly presented a draft policy on
holidays, The holidays are those holidays observed by the state
and stipulated in the employment agreement with the
administrator. Kelly recommended adoption of the policy.
Approval of the policy was moved by Richmond, seconded by
Williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Permit Agenda
7a River Ridge Estates Utilities:
',-) nothing to report or act on at this
Mathiesen noted there was
time.
CCWD ~linlltes: .rlll~' 9.1990
DRAFT
~
7b. Bu~l Oaks Estates: Mathiesen presented resolutions to the
stipulations on the development and recommended approval of the
permit. Moved by Richmond, seconded by Hentges. Motion ca~~ied
with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams)
and no nays.
7b. Burl Oaks Estates Utilities: Mathiesen presented the
information on the utilities and recommended approval Moved by
Richmond, seconded by Williams. Motion carried with five yeas
(Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Information Agenda
8a. WDE site: Kelly presented an update on activities relating to
the WDE site and maintenance of Ditch 57 along the northern
boundary of the site. Kelly noted that Kelly, Mathiesen and
Williams walked the ditch on July 3 and noted approximately three
places where trees needed to be removed but saw no places where
dredging was required or was going to be required in the near
future. Discussion followed on how to get work done before the
site is administered under superfund and disturbance of the creek
for maintenance or repair becomes difficult or impossible. Kelly~.
noted a meeting with the responsible parties on July 11, 1990
where he can express the District's concern and will prevail upon
the responsible parties to provide for maintenance in the consent
decree. Williams expressed concern about property damage
resulting from decreased capacity in the channel a posed the
question of the cost to re-determine benefits under 10GA.
Williams asked Staff to put together an general estimate of the
cost to re-determine benefits and prepare an assessment role
figuring on a cost per household basis.
8b. Quarterly Objectives: Kelly presented work objectives for
July through September. Kelly pointed out that the central theme
was financing and budgeting.
8c Mission Statement: Kelly presented a revised draft mission
statement. Five changes were suggested and noted. All changes
were editorial in nature or points of clarification.
8d Draft Policy: Board of Managers: Kelly presented a draft
policy on the duties and powers of the Board of Managers. He
noted that the policy is intended to specify those aspects of the
mandatory duties of the Board specified in M.S. 112 and dis~ussed
at the June 22 MAWD meeting. The policy is not intended to
address all mandatory duties. Some of the mandatory duties
deserve a separate policy statements such as rule adoption,
project maintenance, and adoption and update of the overall
plan, Kelly noted that the attorney had reviewed the policy and
had several editorial comments that corrected statute citations
__ and other housekeeping items. Kelly noted that the changes will
':-J be made and a revised draft will be submitted to the Board.
rewo ~Iinlltes: .JlIly 9, 19~IO
DRAFT
~~)
He Beaver Policy: Kelly noted that in li~ht of the time that
this issue be brought up at a later date.
9 New Business:
9a. Lee's Wrecking: Williams noted the concern of the Blaine
environmental committee on materials stored at the Lee's wrecking
site in Blaine and the potential of those materials to affect
ground water. Williams Asked about the District's authority to
inspect sites where there is concern about storage of materials
potentially hazardous to water quality. Discussion followed on
the rights and constraints of government.
9b. Drainage Easement to ditch 41 associated with Olympic Glen,
Blaine: Boyum and Kelly gave the board an update on an issue
relating to the city of Blaine acquiring a drainage easement from
L. Hentges. The issue of the extent and maintenance of the
easement was raised. Kelly noted receipt of a Court Order
transferring title and possession to the city of Blaine from Paul
Ostrow, attorney for Blaine.' A quick review of the order
indicates that the easement is from Olympic Glen to Ditch 41 and
includes all maintenance responsibilities are assumed by the city
of Blaine.
'-
9c. Personnel committee: The personnel committee meeting to
review administrative matters was scheduled for Monday July 16 at
4:30 PM. H. Scheff noted that three people constituted a
quorum. Boyum moved to remove Boyum from then committee.
Richmond Seconded. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes,
Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
9d.
and
was
Hentges raised the problem of the width of
the condition of the culvert under TH 65 at
direct to notify the State of the culvert's
Ditch easements
Ditch 41. Staff
condition.
The meeting adjourned at 10:03 p.m, on a motion by Richmond,
seconded by Hentges. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum,
Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Reggie Hemmes, Chairman
-)
}o
c.c.
~? /9v
7'
/d /to t>vt'f:'brl.. ~
f>"",.
~
':)KDA
TOL TZ, KING, DUV ALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
July 23, 1990
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUll0lrlQ
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
612/292-4400
FAX 612/292.0083
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
Re: Lot, 1, Watts Garden Acres
Project 90-6
Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 9748
~-.~.1~"." f:~'." n: .~.' .~.fJ tnn-.""" -
~. -:,",:..r. '1 r~! ~:t .
'I> . ,..'",,", -.; 1'1 f: "
e~';~;~;~-7 .
--.-,.-
CITY OF ANDOVER
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, Minnesota
Dear Mayor and Council:
The low bidder for Part I of the above described project is Ro-So Contracting, Inc. TIle
specifications provide for the City to withhold award of contracts for 60 days at bid prices.
Beyond 60 days would require consent of the contractor or re-bid of the project.
'-
We have contacted Mr. Henry DaBruzzi of Ro-SoContracting, Inc. They would be willing to
hold bid prices until easements are secured by Eminent Domain proceedings.
The City Attorney, Mr. Hawkins, indicated that Eminent Domain proceedings will require a
minimum of 90 days to 120 days. Easements for both Part I and Part II will be secured at this
time. Only Part I, Sanitary Sewer and Watennain will be constructed at this time.
For purpose of extending the award date and conunensurately the completion date, a "draft" letter
from the City to Ro-So is enclosed for your consideration.
We can discuss this in detail at the August 7,1990 Council Meeting.
Sincerely,
"Draft Letter"
"-
<.J
. --
o
\
)
July 23, 1990
Ro-So Contracting, Inc.
7137 20th Avenue North
Centerville, Minnesota 55038
Re: Lot 1, Watts Garden Acres
City Project 90-6
Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 9748
Dear Mr. DaBruzzi:
"-
The City of Andover is in the process of securing easements along the south side of Bunker Lake
Boulevard (County Road 116) for construction of the above named improvements.
The specifications provide for withholding award of contract for 60 days. We fInd the legal
process to secure easements may take as long as 120 days.
\Ve would prefer not to re-advel1ise and re-bid the project. We therefore would request that you
hold your bid prices to allow the City time to secure the right-of-entry.
The City will extend the contract completion date from November 1, 1990 to provide equivalent
time as the securing of the easements might require.
If you are in agreement with these conditions, please sign and return one copy of this letter.
Sincerely,
James Schrantz
City Administrator
JS/ma
1 havc read and agree to the contract extension as proposed.
Henry DaI3nlZ7.i, Ro-So Contracting, lnc.
II
~~
, -.../
,- -\
J
.".
/0: e. e.
8V7-Cju d/2
LAND USE ADVISORY COMMITfEE
Wednesday, July 25, 1990
3-5 p.m.
Room 2A
AGENDA
1. Roll call
2.
Approval of agenda
3. Approval of minutes of July 11, 1990
4.
Evaluation of Density Alternatives (Continued)*
5. Adjourn
~.
Carl Ohrn
*Additional material addressing transportation impacts - highway and
transit - attached.
Mean Park Cen/r<, 230 East Fifth Stred, SI. Pau~ MN 55101 (612) 291-6359 roD 291-0904
:~
,~J
Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Tel. 612-291-6359ffDD 291-0904
MINUTES OF THE LAND USE ADVISORY COMMITIEE
Room 2A
July 11, 1990
3:00 PM
Committee Members Present: Gerald Stelzel, Stephen Bubul, James Filippi, Judy Grant, Bryan
McGinnis, Adrian Rygg, Frank Simon, Neil Weber, Mary Hauser, Council liaison.
Committee Members Absent: Larry Bakken, Michael Hoffman, Richard Little, Linda Thorsvik,
Edwina Garcia, Pat Miller, William Casey.
Council Staff Present: Tori Flood, Carl Ohm, Anne Hurlburt, Bob Overby, Hal Freshley, Paul
Baltzersen, Jack Frost.
Others Present: Kenneth Mahle, Councilmember, City of Woodbury; d'Arcy Bosell, Zoning
Administrator, City of Andover.
Chair Stelzel called the meeting to order at 3:15 pm. The approval of the agenda was moved by
Rygg, seconded by McGinnis and carried. The approval of the minutes from the meetings of March
14th and May 23 was moved by Simon, seconded by Rygg and carried.
Ken Mahle, Woodbury city councilmember, talked about the use of Special or Conditional Use
Permits in the rural area of Woodbury. Mahle stated that residents obtain a permit in order to
operate an "agricultural" business from their home in a non-commercial zone. Since these operations
are not in a commercial zone, the property owners are not paying a fair real estate tax. Mahle stated
that this practice does not comply with the city's comprehensive plan. Mahle asked the committee
for suggestions on how other communities address this problem. Mahle asked advise on how to
enourage these property owners to move to commercial zones where they would be expected to
comply with building specifications. The committee discussed suggestions for enforcement of these
permits and their own experiences in issuing special use permits.
RURAL AREA POLICY STUDY - DENSITY ALTERNATIVES
Carl Ohm, Planning staff, presented a report on the density alternatives that were selected by the
Metropolitan and Community Development Committee (MCDC) on June 28, 1990. Five density
alternatives were selected by the committee: 1 acre, 2 1/2 acres, 5, 10 and 20 acres. The reasons for
the selection of these densities were listed in the report. Chair Stelzel expressed concern of allowing
development on 2 1/2 acre lots in the general rural use area, outside the MUSA and suggested
imposing a set of performance standards. Ohm stated that the cities will be expected to address the
issues of sewer service and the protection of groundwater. Ohm reminded committee members that
the Council is addressing density, not minimum lot size in this first report. There will be three
different elements studied; density, lot size and clustering. Each will be presented and discussed
separately in sequence, so that when lot size is discussed, density will have already been agreed upon.
1
~~
d'Arcy Bosell, representing the St. Francis School District IS, expressed her concern about a change
in rural density, since the school district is forecasting their future enrollment and revenue based on
those cities within the school district developing at 2 112 acres.
Discussion included various problems relating to allowing greater densities in the rural areas.
EVALUATION OF DENSITY ALTERNATIVES
Carl Ohm summarized the criteria that were selected by the MCDC to evaluate the density
alternatives for the general rural use area of the region. Six: topics selected by the MCDC for
discussion are presented in the staff paper. The topics include impact on agriculture, efficient
transitional area development, public uses in the rural area, water quality and quantity, urban sewers
and human services. These will be the major groupings of impacts that both committees will be
discussing. Staff is working on four additional impacts. They include two related to transportation:
highway impacts and exurban transit service; local government services; and housing. Ohm explained
that there is a concern about the impacts on school districts, but added that this information is
difficult to obtain since school districts overlap municipal boundaries in the urban area and outside
the seven county region.
Ohm began discussion on the impact on agriculture, the first of the six: topics. He said that there are
three assumptions in his analysis: it is import to protect agriculture; that there ~ agriculture. to
protect; and that the greater the number of people, the greater the negative impacts on farm
operations. The committee then discussed the tables in the report. Ohm said that the intermixing
of commercial agriculture with the general rural use area causes conflicts with residents who complain
about noise, use of pesticides, operation of machinery, etc. A density standard would hold down the
number of people in these areas and would reduce conflicts. The twenty acre densities in these areas
would provide the best buffer.
The discussion of this report is expected to continue at the next LUAC meeting, Wednesday, July
25, at 3:00.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:10 pm,
Respectfully submitted,
Tori flood, Secretary
LUACXI
July 13, 1990
~
2
~)
TRANSPORTATIONfHIGHWAY CAPACITI AND DE1\1AND - 1988 AND 2010
. In the transportation issue paper, the demand was compared to the capacity of metropolitan highways
outside the MUSA The table provided in that document is recorded below (Table A). While there
is peak hour capacity available on all routes given 1988 traffic, much of this capacity will be used up
by 2010. The 2010 forecasted traffic includes the growth of traffic connecting outstate Minnesota
and the region as well as growth of traffic from the rural area. Eight of the 14 metropolitan highways
will have over 90 percent of the capacity used in the year 2010. At this percentage, the level of
service is significantly deteriorated. Therefore, any additional development that adds to the demand
on these highways will further deteriorate an already bad situation.
Table A
PRESENT AND FUTURE CAPACITI AND USE OF
METROPOLITAN HIGHWAYS IN THE RURAL USE AREA
,...,.
,., 1,
..."c ,;;;;t:'
. I <:~<:1LL ~eaK lLUl ',."
,.,' ,,;
<bll~ LJ.F <~,/ ;e Li
TH 61 (Dakota Co.) 6,500 48 10,400 77 , ,
TH 52 (Dakota Co.) 14,000 52 24,400 91
1-35 (Scott/Dakota) 20,500 38 40,700 76
TH 169 (Scott Co.) 13,000 63 22,800 85
TH 212 (Carver Co.) 5,100 39 11,600 86
TH 7 (Carver Co.) 6,700 50 14,100 104
TH 12 (Hennepin Co.) 9,700 72 15,400 114
TH 55 (Hennepin Co.) 11,000 . 82 26,700 198
1-94 (Hennepin Co.) 32,100 60 54,000 100
TH 10 (Anoka Co.) 18,300 68 33,300 124
TH 65 (Anoka Co,) 16,500 61 30,400 113
1-35 (Anoka Co.) 33,500 62 53,300 99
TH 36 (Wash. Co.) 22,500 61 28,000 76
1-94 (W3;Sh. Co.) 38,000 47 62,200 77
.~'\
,J
1
~
In Table B the present percentage of truck traffic of total daily traffic is recorded. In many cases,
over 10 percent of the traffic is made up of trucks. This data illustrates these points. First the
highways are very important to allow existing economic interaction to take place between the metro
area, Greater Minnesota and the rest of North 'America. Secondly, as the capacity of the
metropolitan highways are filled, it will slow goods movement and add to the cost of doing business.
In turn, this may reduce economic interaction. Third, truck traffic uses up highway capacity at a
much higher rate than other vehicles. Trucks accelerate slow and have more difficulty maneuvering.
Therefore, routes with high levels of truck use have a lower level of effective capacity.
Table B
PERCENT OF TRUCK TRAFFIC OF TOTAL DAILY TRAFFIC - 1988
.., . -..-......-.--.-..,,--,-. .....,~-.---.-,. .-. , .-...-,....., ,....
..-,......,-.......-............-.".......................,' -"....,...........
.,.....................",...."......................."."...".................
<Highway t~ouiitY)
'..__d..._ __.d._..,_... ___.__.____.___._....___..... ...'...
111 61 (Dakota Co,)
111 52 (Dakota Co.)
1-35 (ScottlDakota Cos.)
111 169 (Scott Co.)
111 212 (Carver Co.)
111 7 (Carver Co.)
111 12 (Hennepin Co.)
111 55 (Hennepin Co.)
1-94 (Hennepin Co,)
111 10 (Anoka Co.)
111 65 (Anoka Co.)
1-35 (Anoka Co.)
111 36 (Washington Co.)
1-94 (Washington Co.)
4.5
18.7
11.8
15.6
19.6
10.8
6.1
9.1
10.6
3.7
3.7
6.4
4.6
12.2
In an attempt to illustrate the impact of increased development at various densities on these
highways, three examples have been prepared. For these examples, it was assumed that an addition
of 2,310 acres of land over that forecasted for the rural area would be developed over the next 20
years in the travel shed of three highways. The 2,310 acres represents one-tenth of one standard
township.
,-)
2
, \
'-c_) In Table C, other assumptions are recorded that were nee~ed to prepare this analysis.
Table C
ASSUMPTIONS RELATED TO CALCULATING ffiGHWAY DEMAND
1. Average dailv work trips per household = 3.0.
2. Work trips by hour in NvI peak period,
6 to 7 a.m. = 40% X 1.5 = .6
7 to 8 a.m. = 50% X 1.5 = .75
8 to 9 a,m. = 10% X 1.5 = .15
3. Use of Metropolitan Highways: It was assumed 75 percent of work trips would be made
at least in part on a metropolitan highway.
4. Direction of trip: It was assumed 65 percent of work trips would be made into in the
Urban Service Area.
5. Rideshare: It was assumed 20 percent of the trips would share a ride.
In Table D, the assumptions described in Table C are applied to the added housing units that would
be developed under the five alternatives on the 2,310 acres to produce the total added vehicle trips
for work.
:!
,.
,~
3
~
,-~
o
r-
C'l
~
;:
E-<
~
:::
o
s=
I::J :.:.;::::::-:::::;:::::.::::::<:::::.:.
i \\fi
;:J ::::...'./...........
Q
o
:::
~
~
o
00
~
V"l
'D
~
V"l
'D
Q~
0-
::0:::
",E-<
E-<[;:;J
>oJ
U
-
-
-
~
Q
[;:;J
Q
Q
-<
~
o
z
o
-
j
;:J
U
...:l
-<
U
ii~~
:~}~:}:'Z ::-~
....'.~....~.~' ~
........~?8
::::;:.;.:~;::::;:.::::::;::;.:./,...
~
V"l
r-
.......................
""""""."'''0'
!;\1~;::~:\(]:~i.:g.:
::::--o:::::io..:;;::~:
lm~.'.)m
""",:,:(,<'<>C.(
V)
M
....
r-
'D
'1'
M
~
o
00
~ ~
o 0
00 00
~
V)
'D
~ ~
V"l V"l
'D 'D
~
V)
r-
~ ~
V) V)
r- r-
'1'
'" '" '" '" '"
c.. a. c.. c.. a.
';:: ';:: .;:: .;:: .;::
- - - -
V) V) V) V) V)
r-; r- r-; r-: r-;
o
....
M
C'l~
'1'
C'l
0\
C'l
'D
'1'
.... V)
M ....
C'l ....
'" '" ~
ll) '" ll)
... ll) ... ...
U ... U U
'" U '" '"
'"
V) ~ 0 0
~ .... ~
::.-
-" c '2 'c
<) c ;::l
;::l ;::l ;::l
.... .... .... ....
\
,-J
In Table E, 1-94 in Washington County is analyzed. Given the present development assumptions, 77
percent of the peak hour capacity will be used in 2010. This represents a minor level of congestion
approaching a moderate level of congestion.
Of course, all the alternatives will add work trips to this roadway given the assumptions noted above.
The question that needs to be answered is how significant is the impact of the added travel demand?
Table E
1-94 WASlllNGTON COUNTY
_ 6-lane freeway
_ Peak Hour Capacity 5,250 (1,750 vehic1eslIane)
_ Forecasted 2010 A WDT (average weekday daily traffic) 62,200
_ Projected 2010 Peak Hour Demand 4,043
_ Percent of Peak Hour Capacity Used 77 Percent
B@
i >
1/1
1125
1/5
1/10
1/20
'"
.. ' A ",';<1':' l 1
.........................:.:.:.................................'.:..
1; ...........................
""'1):
.;.,;:.~ i~11
4,719 90
4,313 82
4,178 80
4,110 78
4,077 77
....:............ !o;x
4,043 676
4,043 270
4,043 135
4,043 67
4,043 34
Table E records the increased trips that are projected to oo:ur in the peak hours. The lowest density
alternatives add very few trips and, therefore, neither do they change the percent of capacity used.
The 1/5 and 1/2.5 density alternatives result in over 80 percent capacity being used. The 80 percent
level is defined as the lower limit of a moderate level of congestion or level of service D. The 1/1
density reaches 90 percent of capacity. This point defines the lower limit of significant congestion.
In the case of 1-94, a six-lane freeway, there is a great deal of capacity available. As the other two
examples are reviewed, the impacts of these added trips will be more extreme because of the lower
overall capacity of the highway.
1
.J
5
~J
,
,
"
The second example is TH 169 in Scott County (Table F). This is a four-lane arteriaL The 2010
forecasted peak per hour traffic is 1,482 vehicles which will use 85 percent of the available capacity.
This would be in the moderate congestion range. The 1/20 and 1/10 alternatives have little impact
raising the percent of capacity used to 87 and 89 percent respectively. The 1/5 pushes the percentage
figure up to 92 percent and into the significant congestion level. The 1/2.5 alternative results in 100
percent of the capacity of the road being used. This represents severe congestion, sometimes called
level of service F. The 111 alternative would result in 123 percent of capacity being used. This, of
course, would cause very severe traffic congestion if everyone chose to use this route at the time
when the most wanted to use it. At this level of congestion, people will start to change their travel
behavior to avoid this road at this time of day. People may have to try to change their work hours,
or take other roads. Some travel may have to use county or local roads. Truck use will become more
expensive due to lower speed. Accidents will increase.
Table F
TH 169 - SCOTT COUN1Y
_ 4-lane arterial
_ Peak Hour Capacity 5,250 (1,750 vehiclesl1ane)
_ Forecasted 2010 A WDT 22,800
_ Projected 2010 Peak Hour Demand 1,482
_ Percent of Peak Hour Capacity Used 85 Percent
, 111 1,482 676 2,158 123
1/2.5 1,482 270 1,752 100
1/5 1,482 135 1,617 92
1/10 1,482 67 1,549 89
1/20 1,482 34 1,516 87
1
- /
6
:J The third example is based on TH 61 in Dakota County. This is a two-lane arterial. As noted on
Table G, the capacity of this road is 875 vehicles per lane. The 2010 forecasted demand will utilize
77 percent of capacity. The impact of the five density alternatives is also recorded in Table G. The
1120 and 1110 increase the traffic so that over 80 percent of capacity will be used. The 1/5 increases
traffic to 93 percent, which results in significant congestion. The 1/2.5 density reaches 108 percent
of capacity and the 1/1 results in 155 percent of capacity used. Again, in the latter two cases, the
public using these routes will have to change their travel behavior. Trucks using this route will
increase their operating costs. Accidents will increase. A great deal of pressure will develop to
improve this road.
Table G
TH 61 . DAKOTA COUNTY
_ 2-lane arterial
_ Peak- Hour Capacity 875
_ Forecasted 2010 AWDT 10,400
_ Projected 2010 Peak Hour Demand 676
_ Percent of Peak Hour Capacity Used 85 Percent
1/2.5
1/5
1110
1/20
676
676
676
676
270
135
67
34
811
743
710
108
93
85
81
In conclusion, seven of the 14 metropolitan highways that serve the rural area will have severe levels
of congestion in 2010 if only the development forecasted takes place. The percent of capacity that
will be used for these seven highways range from 99 percent 198 percent The increased traffic
comes from both outside the region as well as in. No matter where these trips originate, the
congestion will reach very high levels if the forecasts are correct for these seven highways.
:J
7
:_)
o
'.
If we assume these forecasts anticipate rural area development will occur at 1/10 density, these
estimates could be conservative. Many communities continually challenge Council estimates as too
low. They believe for whatever reason they will grow larger sooner. Some believe this because they
don't conform to the Council rural area policies.
The remaining seven highways have some capacity that can be utilized. The examples show that
depending on the specific road, the demand of the added development produced by the alternatives
result in different levels of congestion. The 1-94 example is the most optimistic--since it is a six-lane
freeway and has relatively low congestion forecasted in 2010. All other roads have lower capacity and
will be using a higher level of their capacity in 2010. Therefore, these roads have less capacity to
accommodate added demand. The lower density alternatives produce much lower demand since they
accommodate fewer homes and workers and, therefore, produce fewer peak hour trips.
. .
Based on this criteria alone, the lower density alternatives are preferable since they produce the
lowest level of demand on metropolitan highways.
tjpOOSl4
7.9.90
8
~J
TRANSPORT A TIONrrRANSIT
The area beyond the MUSA, be it commercial agriculture or general rural use, is not eligible to
receive either regular route transit service such as that provided by MTC or Metro Mobility Service.
These are restricted to the urban area due in large part to the high cost of providing such service to
a large, low-density area. Transit in the rural area is provided by each county through a variety of
special transportation service programs. The special transportation services are intended to serve
persons who are elderly, physically and mentally disabled, mobility limited and low income. The type
of trips served include medical, shopping, social service, congregate dining, and recreation.
The funding for these services come through the Regional Transit Board (RTB) and county social
service agencies from a variety of sources, including the rural area property tax dedicated to exurban
transit service and State and federal government assistance. Volunteers contribute significantly to
some of these systems, including individuals, community groups and businesses.
This section is intended to describe some of the transit services and demand that exists in the rural
area of the region and present possible implications of rural development at various density levels.
This discussion. also complements the human services analysis since the use of a variety of human
services is dependent on transporting the user to the provider.
The first part of this section presents costs and performance data for current rural transportation
providers. The discussion is limited to the nine special transportation service providers thatare
funded in part from the exurban transit program of the RTB. There are many more transportation
providers that serve parts of the rural area. These are private, non-profit and for-profit services.
Comprehensive inventories of these services or those who are served are not readily available.
Since the RTB administers grants to these nine programs, it reports regularly on various factors such
as expenses, ridership and performance measures. The following data was taken principally from an
RTB memorandum written Nov. 15, 1989, to the RTB's Administration and Finance Committee from.
Edward Kouneski, program manager. The statistics used were for 1989. These are estimates based
on the best data available at that time.
The funding for each of the nine separate programs is illustrated in Table A Fares only produce
four percent of the revenue needed to operate these systems. Subsidies are contributed by local
government and others (30 percent), federal (8 percent) and state government (36 percent) and the
exurban property tax (22 percent). In many cases, these programs utilize volunteers extensively.
Such volunteers may drive their own cars to take individuals to and from medical appointments or
to act as dispatchers or provide other assistance. The volunteers generally receive reimbursement
for some costs such as mileage and parking.
In Table B, various performance measures are recorded. The quarter of a million rides provided in
1989 cost an average of $6.84 each. The average fare received for these trips was 2ge. The subsidy
was over $6.50 per ride. Since volunteers are used extensively to provide this service the costs would
be much higher if paid staff were used exclusively.
<J
:)
'\
'J
.'
Table A
1989 FINANCIAL DATA - RURAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS
~~i i wi II i~!
~;
<\,.,",
Anoka $193,953 $5 ,551 $107,203 - $26,400 $54,799
.
Carver 225,000 14, 000 22,662 67,323 78,927 42,088
Dakota 49,396 - 38,596 - - 10,800
Volunteer
DARTS 591,374 18, 625 196,741 - 273,374 102,635
HSI Trans. 268,401 16, 250 50,870 - 174,461 50,499
or Wash, Co.
Scott 167,607 6,455 27,140 52,771 50,108 31,133
Senior 86,376 2,913 29,212 - . 54,251
Community
Senior 60,000 4,000 34,400 7,000 - 15,600
Transportation
Westonka 37,005 4,107 4,688 14,710 - 13,500
TOTAL $1,679,112 $71, 901 $511,512 $141,804 $603,270 $375,304
Percentage 100% 4% 30% 8% 36% 22%
2
CJ
,-.J
Table B
PERFORMANCE MEASURES - RURAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS
II ". ,}, c"""""""""""." I
'" ......'...... ~I;~
i} ~.~~. , i ~:
III
Anolca 18,560 S1O.45 S10.15 1.54 S16.13 2.8
. .
CARTS 54,298 4.14 .3.89 2.61 10.80 7.37 6.22
Dakota 9,818 5.03 5.03 1.26 6.33 15.22 0
Volunteer
DARTS 68,800 8.60 8.32 2.86 24.62 5.06 3.15
HSI 32,000 8.39 7.88 3.00 25.19 5.63 6.05
Scott 37,000 4.53 4.36 2.31 10.48 6.08 3.85
Senior 8,500 10.16 9.82 2.88 29.22 3.11 3.37
I.
Community
Senior 5,486 10.94 10.21 238 26.06 10.19 6.67
Trans.
Westonlca 10,282 S3.6O S3.20 5.71 S20.56 1.63 1LIO
The high cost and low revenues are not surprising. The low density of the rural areas served require
driving long distances to pick up individuals and take them to shopping centers, senior centers and
medical clinics. In many cases, individuals need to go into the urban area for special medical
treatment not available in the rural area. Since the cost for this trip is not covered under most health
insurance plans, individuals seek out other options.
Given this information, what impact would further development at the five density levels have on the
demand for these services or how they might be provided? There are no quantitative answers. The
narrative below suggests some possible impacts.
3
'~J
Will the demand for these services increase with increased development? The users of these services
do so because they have no options, cannot afford private transportation, or are attempting to save
money by using these services instead of paying for private service which might be very expensive.
A majority of users are elderly, low income or have some disability that restricts or limits
transportation options such as physical or mental handicaps. There are young people using these
services, but they typically are included in one of the sub-groups described above.
Will the demand increase given increased development at increased density? The discussion below
parallels the six major points made in the discussion of Human Services. The implications for
increased demand for special transportation services are suggested below.
1. In-migrants' expectations for "formal" services are likely to be higher.
It is doubtful many new residents in the rural area will expect that public transit services are
better than they would find in the fully developed area. Few will expect service better than
suburban service, even though the level of such service is quite low other than for select trips
to the metro centers.
As the need for special transportation services build due to illness, aging or for other reasons,
and if the expectations for "formal" services are higher it can be expected this will also apply to
transit services. This may have a significant impact due to the high cost of transit in a low
density area. Lower density means lower passengers per mile and higher mileage which
translates to higher costs, resulting in higher per passenger subsidies.
The basic difference between the density alternatives as related to this concept is that the higher
density alternatives could allow more new, in-migrants to these rural communities and, therefore,
due to their greater numbers increase their influence in these communities, demanding and
receiving a higher level of services.
2. In the longer term, the need for human services (and, therefore, for transit services) will grow
disproportionately faster in the rural area than in the more urban areas.
It can be expected that the new in-migrants' needs for special transportation service will be
lower than the existing population when they move to the rural area, even though some people
will move in as transit dependents. Over time, these people will grow older, they will "age-in-
place" and the need and desire to maintain their independence will produce a significant demand
for transportation services. The rural location will make longer trips necessary so that
individuals cautious about driving due to poor eyesight or other ailments will seek an alternative.
As noted above, the key differences among the density alternatives discussed previously, is that
the higher density alternatives might cause a larger influx of residents who at some time will
require increased human services and a greater likelihood that some in-migrants will be transit
dependents.
3.
Unit costs for human services (transit services as part of these costs) will be higher in the rural
area.
,-'J
4
~ )
:J
Transportation is now and will continue to be a significant element of human seIVice delivery
costs. Trade offs will need to be weighed between providing more seIVice centers, which will
increase accessibility, or increasing the level of transportation seIVices available to provide access
to the existing seIVice centers. In either case, increased costs will result.
There are two impacts that might occur given the alternatives: 1) the higher density will produce
more demand for human seIVices, 2) the larger number of people and needs may allow more
accessible seIVice centers to be created.
4. "Aging-in-place" and "mainstreaming" persons with disabilities will make human seIVices
increasingly dependent on adequate transportation seIVices.
As noted above, the higher density alternatives might increase the number of transit dependant
clients in the rural. Human seIVice agencies will need to provide necessary seIVices for the
individuals.
5. Different standards will be developed for human seIVices in rural areas.
As noted above (and below), the new in-migrants may expect a higher level of seIVice than the
existing population. For a variety of reasons, public agencies may desire to provide a different
(lower) level of seIVice in the rural or low density areas. The new residents may not be willing
to accept this decision. They may demand and receive a higher level of seIVice for which all
rural residents and possibly even urban residents will have to pay.
The density alternatives that allow more people to move to the rural area may result in an
electorate that want a higher level of seIVice and that may have enough votes to get it.
6. The type of housing that is developed and the kind of commercial development that IS
accomplished will profoundly affect the characteristics of persons who elect to in-migrate.
The characteristics of individuals and families--income, number of children, number of workers,
age, disability--will affect the seIVices they want and need. If the hOUSing type/costs match the
jobs that are available in the community or in the near by communities, then the transit
problems are decreased. If social' and medical seIVice are available near the area developed,
then transit problems are decreased.
The higher number of people may be able to generate enough demand to allow some businesses
and personal seIVices to be provided in the rural area. It is doubtful this will reduce trip length
enough to reduce cost significantly.
Conclusions:
o
The more people that move to the rural area the higher the number of potential users of special
transportation seIVices. Due to the low density of the area, passenger miles will be higher,
resulting in a higher unit cost for seIVice, which, in turn, will result in a higher subsidy.
5
~J
. '')
I
-'
o The average cost for special transportation trips in 1988 was about $6.85 and the average
subsidy was approximately $650 per ride. These costs are much lower than they would be if it
were not for volunteer drivers and other contributions. The level of volunteer activities range
from 100% of the service provided by the Dakota County Volunteer Transportation Program,
to no contribution in the DARTS program. More typical, contributions are represented by the
31 % of the hours of travel in the Senior Community Services Program to 69% of the hours of
service in Anoka County. Volunteers accounted for 25% of the trip miles in the Senior
Transportation Program to 68% in Carver County. Based on these contributions, the cost of
the average ride could be double or triple the average cost. (Of course, this is not true of the
two Dakota County programs.)
In comparison, the average total cost of a Metro mobility ride today is about $10.00. This
represents a subsidy of about $850. Regular route transit service in the region costs an average
-of $1.57 per ride, which includes a subsidy of about $1.10.
The density of development in the rural even at the highest level evaluated (1 unit/l acre) is
far from the density required to cost effectively use regular route transit. Other than using
volunteers, there is no inexpensive way to provide transit in the rural area.
o Based on this criteria alone, the lowest density alternatives are preferable, since they will hold
dOMl demand for special transportation service.
kjpOO556
7.18.90
6
r"{'KDA
TOLTZ. KINO. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
'---'
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDlNO
SAINT PAUl, MINNESOTA 55101
el212g2-4400
FAX 61212ll2-oo63
August 2,1990
Honorable Mayor and City Council
~dover,Mllulesota
Re: Feasibility Report Update
Hidden Creek East - 3rd Addition Phase I
Project 90-5
~dover, Minnesota
Conunission No. 9716
Dear Mayor and Council:
The above referenced project is the third phase of Hidden Creek East, as noted in the feasibility
report for Project 87-1, dated January 29, 1987. That report details all improvements and covers
project costs and details. This letter amends that report for the 3rd Addition - Phase I.
Cost Estimate
The third addition proposes 38 residential lots. The cost estimate, based on the feasibility report,
is as follows:
Estimated Construction Cost per Unit:
$6,065 (1987) x 1.07 (ENR lndex)
$ 6,600.00
Estimated Total Construction Cost (21 Lots)
138,600.00
Estimated Total Project Cost
41.580.00
$180,180.00
Project Expenses (30%)
Estimated Assessments
Estimated Project Assessment Rate, $180,180/21 Lots ==
$ 8,580.00
,-- ........
'-J
o
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, Mumesota
February 19, 1990
Page Two
Trunk charges are based on the 1990 rates for sewer and water.
Sanitary Trunk Charge, $912.00/Acre x 7.2 Acres
6,566.00
Water Trunk Charge*, $972/Acre x 7.2 Acres
None *
Sanitary Sewer Connection Charge, $232.9 x 21 Lots
4,891.00
Watennain Connection Charge*, $1,055 x 21 Lots
None *
Storm Sewer Area Charge**, $600 x 21 Lots
12.600.00
$204,237.00
Total Estunated Improvement Cost
Total Estimated Improvement Assessment Rate:
$204.237 = $9,726.00
21 Lots
*
SW 1/4 of SW 1/4, Section 34, Township 32, Range 24 previously assessed water area and
connection charges.
** The anticipated area stnnn sewer assessment for 1990 is $1,742.40 per acre or
approximately $600.00 per lot.
Sincerely yours,
John L. Davidson, P.E.
JLD/mha
~J
I I . ,"
]
~
J
:II 3: :Q
z ..
:ll w ~
;l; 0
z j
~ <t a
~ -'
~ 11
:ll "<T
!2 N
N
I-
en
<(
w
~
w
w
a:
0
z
w
0
0
I
3=
z
W
~
"E
'"
!2
MN 15 HSn~Hl :
,
" :! " !" =
'"
;, .. .. .. Q
Q =
'-
TIlII
\ \ ~\In MrLSra~:/
,,~ . .
\~
'-.j
:II
:ll
.".....
- ~
-
--3=
.. !2 Z
- .
__w
: 'R ~
;:--i:
!:: "<T
:::.~~
..
~
o
j
a
3:
z
w
Z
<t
-'
:Q
;l;
~
~
11
:ll
~
"<T
'"
I-
en
<(
w
~
w
w
a:
o
z
w
o
o
I
MN 15 HSn~Hl i
'!! !: !2 ~ =
'"
;,
(1) . Q
..
Q =
)TIl\i
\ \ \~ \ \ 1\ Mj"LS ra~:/
'.
3=
z
W
~
"E
'"
!2
<J
....:.(l(](.<~;~_.,,>,>~\
; ~,i- ~ ,:~I
/;./,' 't;~
~-~ t,'
'J II
\~~~ ..l.. ,A/
;'.'., "--- .",~~.I'.'
.....:-....-"'''''
7:30 PM
'\
/
CITY of ANDOVER
Regular City Council Meeting-August 7, 1990
Call to Order
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Discussion Items
1. Public Informational Hearing/Boundary Commission
2. Creek ridge Estates Sidewalk Discussion
3. Ken Heil Sketch Plan
4. Ordinance 8, Section 8.08 Amendment/parking
5. Ordinance 10, Section 9.03 Amendment
'.
Staff, Committee, Commission
6. Amend Personnel Policy *9/Holidays
7. Personnel Policy Amendment
8. Approve primary Election Judges
9. Approve Certification of Cleanup Costs/13650
Hanson Boulevard
10. Adopt 1988 Building Code
11. 169th Lane Traffic Study
12. Accept Resignation/utility Billing Clerk, Cont.
13. Accept Resignation/Recptionist-Sec., Cont.
14. Speedy Market Special Use Permit Discussion
Non-Discussion Items
15. Approve Specs/Rubbish Cleanup/pumkin City
16. Approve plans & Specs/Blackfoot St./90-14
17. Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Study/
Hidden Creek East 3rd Addn./90-5
18. Amend Joint Powers Agreement/CSAH 9 & 135th
19.
20. Approve Joint Powers Agreement/CSAH 78 & CR 116
21. Release Escrow/Red Oaks Manor 5th & 6th Additions
Approval of Claims
Adjourn
c~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE 1\ngncr 7. 1 QQn
A
BY:
Administrat. D' on
j
(i. .
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
July 17, 1990 Regular Meeting
July 18, 1990 Special Meeting
( Pe rry absent)
.)
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
.~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 7, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.1. publi c
Hearin
BY:
Engineering
The City Council set a public meeting to discuss establishing a
Boundary Commission to review metes and bounds description to
resolve boundaries between adjoining properties.
Notices were mailed to the property owners in Auditor's
Subdivision No. 82 (see attached letter, list of names and map).
Also note Bill's letter of June 13, 1990 briefly describing the
procedure. (See June 19, 1990 Minutes for discussion).
I have had two calls; both from owners of original Auditor's
Subdivision No. 82 lots along the lake.
Enclosed: Letter to residents
List of property owners notified
Map
Bill's June 13th letter
.J
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
() ll(}\" f"'~">"'~
~ ~
. ',,0 A,)
:'j- ...~:::
(...... ,-,,:,
."'/"'"'"..__...._.1.
:~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
July 23, 1990
NOTICE OF PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL HEARING
Dear Residents:
Over the last several years the City has become aware of a survey
problem which has affected nearly all of the properties in your
area. Your property may be affected by this problem. In the
past, the City has had no alternative in an attempt to resolve
this problem for the residents; however, the Minnesota legislature
recently adopted new law which allows the City to set up a
Boundary Commission for the purpose of attempting to establish
agreements between adjoining property owners as to the location of
common boundaries. Several of the property owners in your area
have already commenced legal proceedings on their own to resolve
this problem. The expense of this has been enormous and the City
believes that the establishment of a Boundary Commission and
utilization of the procedures set out there can substantially
reduce the cost to residents such as yourself. The costs for the
individual proceedings have been running between $2,500 and
$3,500. The city has received a preliminary estimate that would
indicate the cost for resolving this problem could be as little as
$500 per lot. These costs would be specially assessed against the
property owners by the City upon conclusion of the proceedings.
The City Council has scheduled a public informational hearing for
August 7, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. at the Andover City Hall for the
purpose of input by the residents and to determine whether or not
they would be interested in having the City establish a Boundary
Commission, resolving the property description disputes and
assessing the costs to the benefited parcels. Please plan on
being in attendance at this meeting if possible. If you have any
questions, please contact City Hall.
Sincerely,
~-:. Sch,ant,
City Administrator
29 32 24 31 0033
Maynard Hoffman
14407 Woodbine st
Andover, Mn 55304
2~;2 24 31 0036
Mark & Meghan Kaitner
14329 Woodbine st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0039
Lawrence Morris
14318 Underclift st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0042
Scott & Rebecca Buchanan
3720 - 143rd Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0045
Dale & Carla Lang
14299 Underclift st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0048
stephen & J.R. Libor
14279 Underclift st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0051
William & C.S. LeFebrve
14278 Underclift St
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0054
Robert & S.L. Haslip
14269 vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0057
William & Becke Becker
14414 Woodbine st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0060
sC"()tt Roessler
f '16 Woodbine st
. /
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0034
Alan & D.L. Flavion
14359 Woodbine st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0037
Jeffrey & J.C. Rygwall
14339 Woodbine st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0040
William & Janice Goudy
14319 Woodbine st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0043
John & Cynthia Norton III
14288 Vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0046
Jeffrey & Carol Voelz
14289 Underclift st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0049
David & D.M. stanton
3648 - 143rd Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0052
Stephen & Linda Sexton
14289 Vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0055
Michael & M.B. Harris
14278 vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0058
Duane & Joan Larkin
14366 Woodbine st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0061
Patrick Phillip Nelson
14338 Woodbine st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0035
MichaeJ & Victoria
Hajney
14349 Woodbine st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0038
Michael & Mary Vevea
14328 Underclift st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0041
Kenneth & J.E. Ebert Jr.
14309 Woodbine st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0044
Wayne & Mary Ness
14268 Round Lake Blvd
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0047
Robert & Margarete Keene
14269 Underclift st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0050
Frances Forbes & P Akron
14299 Vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0053
Boyd Ruud & Donna Flynn
14279 vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0056
Kenneth Seifert
14268 Vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0059
Duane & Connie Kazemba
14356 Woodbine st.
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0062
David & Karen Petermeier
14328 Woodbine st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0063
Michael & Nancy Nolan
14318 Woodbine st
Andover, Mn 55304
2~)2 24 31 0066 .
Harry & Ruth Ann Moberg
14289 Woodbine St
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0070
Rosella Sonsteby
4151 - 141st Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0073
steven Sonsteby
3755 - 143rd Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0076
Craig & Teresa Nichols
14339 Xenia st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0079
Carol & John Johanson
14349 Xenia st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 24 0003
Stephen & E.R. Wood
3723 - 145th Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 24 0006
Robt & Elizabeth Thiede Jr.
14423 Underclift st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 24 0009
Brenda Dotseth
14429 Vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 24 0012
Gory & L.M. Smith
~ '5 - 145th Avenue
Al1dover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0064
Melvin & Esther Niska
3737 - 143rd Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0067
Dennis & Marilyn Reinhardt
14279 Woodbine st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0071
Rosella Sonsteby
4151 - 141st Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0074
Eugene & Colleen Gibson
14319 Xenia st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0077
Carol & John Johanson
14349 Xenia st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 24 0015
Ruth Woodstrom
3701 - 145th Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 24 0004
Clara Rodie
3739 - 145th Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 24 0007
Daniel & P.M. McNeill
1999 W. Co Rd E
New Brighton, MN 55112
29 32 24 24 0010
M J Jensen & K L Blowers
14426 vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 24 0013
Gerald Nordstrom
3655 - 145th Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0065
Richard Johnson Jr.
3740 - 143rd Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0069
David & Joann Jablonio
14269 Woodbine st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0072
Courtney & Mary Lou Kuch
14298 Woodbine st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0075
Sandra Torgerson
14329 Xenia St
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0078
David & Joann Jablonic
14269 Woodbine st
Andover, Mh 55304
29 32 24 24 0002
Donald & Donna Groetsch
3711 - 145th Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 24 0005
Todd Harrison
3615 - 145th Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 24 0008
Randy & Julie Eidsmoe
14428 Underclift st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 24 0011
See of Housing & Urban
220 So 2nd st
Minneapolis, Mn 55402
29 32 24 24 0016
Gerald & Judith Nordstrom
3655 - 145th Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
2CJ2 24 31 0030
Clyde & S.J. Bade
14406 Vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0027
J J & Lois Lothspeich
3629 - 143rd Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24'31 0024
Donald & Janet Legge
14417 Vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0021
David & Lynn Blackstad
14349 Vintage St
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0018
Philip & Therese Jorgensen
14338 Underclift st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0015
William & Robin Thiffault
14406 Underclift st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0012
John & Judith Berry
14401 Underclift St
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0009
Alvin & Grace Fitzpartick
14288 Round Lake Blvd
Andover, Mn 55304
I
I 29 32 24 31 0006
K"-,t Sundquist
~, ,3 - 143rd Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0032
Robert & J.A. Ruchti
14417 Woodbine st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0029
Raymond & Wendy Guimont
14358 Vintage St
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0026
John & L.P. Johnson
14338 Vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0023
John Green
14407 Vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0020
Martin & C.C. Castle
14339 Vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0017
Brian & Deanna Pratt
14348 Underclift st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0014
Kevin & Julia Sylvers
14416 Underclift st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0011
Richard & Mary Egge
3607 - 144th Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0008
Denis & Jodi Larson
14309 Vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0005
James & Barbara Enson
3605 - 143rd Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0031
Sheryl Anderson
14416 Vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0028
Norman & Eldora Erickson
14348 Vintage St
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0025
James & Barbara Roberts
14328 Vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0022
Bradley & L.L. Chabot
14359 Vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0019
Mark & Jeanne Strand
14329 Vintage St
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0016
Melvin & M.J. Litke
14358 Underclift st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0013
Robert & M.J. Ammend
14411 Underclift st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0010
D A & L J Bonneville
3608 - 143rd Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0007
Dennis & R.A. McKenzie
14319 Vintage st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0004
Edward Gully III
14319 Underclift st
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0003
Terry & Elizabeth Bishop
14329 Underclift st
Andover, Mn 55304
-~J
J
29 32 24 31 0002
Richard & S.J. Bombard
3608 - 144th Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
29 32 24 31 0001
John Zillhardt
3753 - 145th Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
c,):'
n ~
'1
\/ /
~
?,,~)' ~
/.~ ) Q 0
\~~
~'"
~
\Ii
~
~
~
tf
. -
l"
~t
~
.........
~
~
<
,
~
~
'"
.f"
,;:'
~,
"
...
~
~
,<>'"
.]
~~
~~
~~
~~
~
~
~;';.::J'b l:. 1-;, <,,1 .,~ ' ,<::::
:"', 'h.\~' c.X!.... a'::'- "'~ no' ~Ul; ~<:--
:.~ ~,::t. '" ~ - -"!;,;-- ~ 7.,"'-' .. . ~.::::: 'r.-"-'-.\:j': '.: :
.~ .~<:. -'" ; ~'€," 0 . .
:~ ',,;>r:cn ~~:;: . _.~ : '~~ --:. Co '. tJ)' .....
.' :::1-,. 11 N 'Z.... z ..
.. .. -\ 1 --:::;::::-.. .. MH "VI'
~! I.:t[ . . ~ r:'':- I .. \ - _~__;t "-~ '.
_ '...............s::-
-- . ~--
Co -~-"\ Co~
-: -]'~ -- ~,.
, ~ ---
.. ~ ~
-1~~'"':o~-r ,
jr--
)::,; .
-
\:;
.....
~
, ~
. ~
~
:
~
._-~ -
--
'.
Q)
~J)
------.--------- -
. - '~,',','
r'Vl ',',',
, '.".,'.1,
(~~
-------
\
\
b"" II '<::~ I ',,-
r~~.k!'Hp~~ N":" ./~ I I '''-.,
~ ~I' 5iHI~~~~ I I
~ 'I+I'~~~ I I~
~~ ,~~ ~;.Y' '" I.; 'b,~ -~~
-~ -t~. i I '-~ (t:#1f~<"~:-)-
. .\~ " i'~"7 - - - - - ----- -'tr . , ~ ,
..-- ~.. . . .. II ~
: ~. ~ . ;; .'. II - ~ _~~'"
~... '<I' -c. .. ~,..;... II -- -
., ~ ~ ~ -T,.. f";- .~ 1 m r_ X ~ _~_\..
:q.it -: :.: : \~: ~l:1.:~' ~,~'~'~I" . --- ~,,,:[O~ < ,.:. L ",-\
~r-G1' ~I-o- . -= -;- -. ~ :J.:'.:IJ;,-. __ ~ ~,.0' . rGq, "
I . "" ~I ~ . :N; ,~~ ~ C> '- ~ ~ ; 1 L .0 11'
~n' I~ .cr... '?" I ~ ~ ~ . ~ 1:1 I z I v; -1'-1/
'1 - - .f-' - - ~ ):r;.' I~ ~~. ::. j g 1 I
~:'- . v...I~."'.~: I'~..' I-L 1.11'1 !I /1"1
~.J O~~TO;, ~ ~1:,~g~:tG :;r~;"": ~"'+~~' ~1'~~~T_~;;~t/~/S
I ~~~ Co ,,2. -'b:~:e ~,'::'I-- . P
~-- CENTER'" -~. . ~~: ~. iT ..IX 'r-;-";- ~~?\~ ,,- .: , " l
; ;-'"/,..... ff~~ ri' .~ , ~~~. ';f 'j: ~
W':lt -rT~', 'l"~~'.~-:-- IIC):-i:; .;.~?\
1-- ' ~:q-':~'1 .~~ .' :l:Jf-;---:-.I-;~~: ~', ~ ~
I.!M~ I ~'\"l""~.. .....~.. "":-._ ~~, t:).:~
l\t"~ "~ I~~ r~ e '!')' .. 8 . 1-7- . " ~ "
I _ ,,' ,;.:; ,.:P.1 ~ : ~H -7 ii . f-~ . ffi '- I ~
I "'"" ,... " , : . l'i , : . L ~ r) I, C" ." I "'I . ..\:.~' " .' ' '",.,'",,"-
] . -I\, .+I"i--W,, '/'1"'1""" ...,...,1 ",.\: ~ ,."'"
~ .I.t-.>I-I .t-- -I< 2 -,-1 -.-,,-.,-,.----'_..k( +I'H,'T+'''.'.~Y-' ,...".".,,"
L' , ~.~ ~t~ ~. ., / :;-;.'j\'~>".,~~,p.>'" ,r.'i, '.<",,~
;Q~ n~ Iii i ~~: .. -=-~ ,-;- ~- ----.... '.~~~1~0;'1~1'1t:1'~1::1~1-", ~ ~ ~I::.... ~ ....1;<...~."".~.._
. ~. ~ ~ -; .~l\. ~j~ -1'" ':-- ,... / ~ t ,-'H"J-/CoEsTArEsl"I:.".~1 ~"'\ ; .~. ""'<~"
m; ..,~:" ~.~: i~ ~ ~ . N c:c~ ,,-.!.:; l',47 N~
I : -~~~~: . ~ ~ ~~ : ~ ~ l~ ". ~ ~ 11/\\/ --r,'\G """'" .'. .",of '" 'I-~~~::'::'
:I: !/...,~ ~,-- ~ ~ ~~ ~" ~ I
I - .. 0 ~ ... ~.u 1I 1I .' "H'
L--: I f-c - 15]; I~ >..; I
!)~- ~ r: ~"-: ~) ';--, 2 $~ ~ t \ C' I
:' i' l~ . v v- ~ 1;0' ~ ~ ~:;? 'i ~ I
'.')... '- 1t li'~ _ ~ ~ _ ()~, I
"@::-"'i- ' ~ ~ 0 - . '\'.~ ~ 2l- ,~~ I
] K::_ 0 ~\ /~ _' ~ ~ '
/ IX~ --~ t5 I
, -- - l;j/ <).
:~. - n~UL~__ - ~l>f ],:2~~>-:-'. .:
, ) ~ I '" 0:'~ ~,,,,. ~-.:-'t'.-
d ~~ ' - 'l:.;- ---- ,- ..-=-=
: ". Iti!. ~ ' '=- :;, -- ~ ',- - 1- .o.::-L:::-"'O:'" .\'\
~j I s: \ 0 -l: ~_.__~____...~~--:-;:..~~ :: 1,_
ltj~ ~ I .......... i~ .~=~_u_ - \L.-:~'~-
I-~I ;: "1 ...... :.... -.
~ :!' "\>01; I..........~ ~'~l '~f-='--=:= ' ~..
5:- '" 'c ch ,tfr ] ] ] t-=J'- ; ~ _ ___ _ 'r---Q-
" . Cor T Ie<<<-", . b. -- . II
. w..~"'/-II 17-1'6' ,..:j - -- \\
~ - .Co ~~n r,' "1-, ,:i~f11~' ..=- r~-=~---- \\r---L--------
i~-..J. ~ _0 . I f.I.. I 'hB. . ,,1 ~ rl \ " \\\
"
h
~
'jlk
LAW OFFICES OF
11f)r1 4t 6
'/If/f D
,)
Burke nltd Jlnwkilts
SUITE 101
JOHN M. 8URKE
WILLIAM G. HAWKINS
299 COON RAP]OS 80ULEV ARD
COON RAPIDS. M]NNESOTA 55433
PHONE (61 2) 784-2998
rrf-(/~-~ llt'D"
nE~;o-7
CITY OF' ~,NDOVFR
June 13, 1990
Mr. James E. Schrantz
Andover City Hall
1685 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
Re: Auditor's Subdivision No. 82 - Boundary Problems
De a r J im :
)
Over the past several years the City has become aware of a
survey problem which has affected a large number of lots in that
area generally known as Auditor's Subdivision No. 82 located on
the south side of Round Lake. Due to the improper placement of
an iron all of the legal descriptions for these parcels are
incorrect. In the past I have held meetings with the County
Surveyor, Examiner of Titles and attorneys and surveyors for
property owners in an effort to find an economical solution to
this problem. We are unable to come t,o any agreement and all of
the property owners in this area have been left with the
commencement of a legal proceedings known as a title registra-
tion 'action in order to resolve this problem. This has resulted
in costs to property owners of between $2,500.00 and $3,500.00.
During the 1990 regular legislative session a new piece of
legislation was adopted which I believe will allow the City to
become involved in solving these boundary problems for all of,
the property owners in this area at a substantially reduced cost
than they presently are incurring: Chapter 386 of Laws 1990
allows the City Council to create a Boundary Commission.
Members of the Commission must be residents of the county who
are familiar with real property. The Boundary Commission shall
review metes and bounds descr iptions withi n the, Ci ty and attempt
to establish agreements between adjoining landowners as to the
location of common boundarles. If an agreement cannot be
reached the Commission makes a recommendation as to the location
of the common boundary and shall prepare a plan designating all
agreed and recommended boundary lines and report same to the
City Council. The City Council then conducts a public hearing
after giving mailed notice to all parties in interest and
.~)
'\
,-J
Mr. James E. Schrantz
June 13, 1990
Page 2
publishing notice thereof 20 days pr ior to the hear ing.
Following the hearing the City then petitions the District Court
for judicial approval of the plan. The Court determines the
location of any contested, disputed or unagreed boundaries and
shall determine adverse claims to each parcel. After a hearing
by the Court and determining all disputes, the Court shall issue
its judgment in the form of a plat complying with Minnesota
statute Chapter 505 and designating the owners and encumbrancers
of each lot. .
The City may assess all or any part of the costs incurred
against the benefited properties as provided for in Minnesota
Statute Chapter 429.
In reviewing this statute, the problems that exist in the area
and discussing same with an attorney who has been involved in
title registration actions in the area, we believe that the
boundary line problem can be resolved for $500.00 per lot.
There are approximately 90 lots which are affected and have this
common boundary line problem.
It is my request that you have this matter placed on the City
Council agenda at their next meeting so that I may discuss the
provisions of this new law and the possible use by the City.
(0~)e~~JlY ,
~G.
Hawkins
WGH:mk
Ene.
.
~)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 7, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
~lK'
BY:
ITEM
NO.
2. Creekridge Estates
Sidewalk Disc
The city Council has requested the residents of Creekridge Estates
to attend this meeting to discuss the development of Creekridge
Estates Park and construction of a sidewalk.
Attached to this item are a letter sent to area residents by the
City, the Neighborhood Park Questionnaire which was distributed by
the neighborhood residents, diagrams showing possible location of
sidewalks for the north or south sides, and a combination
utilizing both the north and south sides.
In review, the development of the park was not staff initiated but
by the residents in the area. The Park and Recreation Commission
has budgeted approximately $13,000 for development of the park
which includes grading, picnic tables, and playground equipment.
South Coon Creek Drive is a designated MSA street and most
recently State Aid allowed cities to request needs for sidewalks.
Without the sidewalk it will be very difficult to be able to get
residents to the park without trespassing on private property.
The City has had some concern expressed from residents along South
Coon Creek Drive regarding the placement of the sidewalk.
Attached is the envelope indicating (approved in 1983) placement
of underground utilities (electric, cable t.v., telephone, gas).
The City needs to be consistent in placement of these utilities.
All utility companies require a permit from the City Engineer
prior to installation. By placing sidewalks over these utilities,
it may cause future problems in repairing the utilities.
Due to existing South Coon Drive at time that Creekridge Estates
had developed, watermain and sanitary sewer was installed in the
boulevard behind curb on the south side.
continued
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
.~ TO
SECOND BY
()
Page Two
August 7, 1990
Item #2
The results of the Neighborhood Park Questionnaire are as follows:
1. Do you approve of development of a park
in the Creek ridge Estates housing development?
Yes - 36
No - 5
2. If "yes" to Question #1, do you or members of
your family intend to use this park?
Yes - 34
No - 5
3. Do you approve of construction of a sidewalk
on South Coon Creek Drive?
Yes - 36
No - 5
4. If "yes" to Question *3, which side of South
Coon Creek Drive do you recommend the
sidewalk be installed? (Open to
North - 23
South - 7
Discussion) - 5
A total of 72 lots are in the Creekridge Estates subdivision. 31
lots did not respond.
Some of the additional comments or concerns made on the
Questionnaire are as follows:
(The following comments were from individuals in favor of the
park)
* Will there be traffic control at one of the intersections to
allow children to cross the road?
* Is the City going to remove trees on the north side to allow for
construction of the sidewalk?
* We need a park!
* Would like the sidewalk closer to South Coon Creek Drive.
* Keep tree removal minimal.
* Totally opposed to removing large mature trees on north side of
South Coon Creek Drive.
* Having the park will hopefully prevent the kids in the
neighborhood from playing in the street and cul-de-sac.
* Place sidewalk next to curb.
(The following comments were from individuals that were not in
favor of the park)
~
* I think it would not be beneficial to the community.
* I would be in favor of the park if it could be built on a vacant
lot along Jonquil or Kerry Streets.
* I would prefer the sidewalk on the south side if the park
construction does get approved.
.:.;
,.
,.
co
... ...
-
...:
.f2
q"
"-
to
~
-
'"
'..J
---
"I
"'1.
..
...
K~
~ ~"
".....~
..-
.:>,
:;
~ .
\)
""
\J
..,.
~
tl:l
"'.,..
...
'-- ./"
. .0,
J .
...
/ ~
/'
- 0..-
~ .
o ~
\to ...
c:!
,go
- III
! SID
" ~
..... -. L.
"0 ~
~ ~
'" "
-.-. K.~
()
c::.
"
o
~
~U
"'
lq
'"
"t
~
-< Z:""
-'.---
......-~ ~~J. .
NEIGHBORHGHI>D F ARK
~)
The City of Andover is in the process of obtaining final permits and
approval for development of a park in our neighborhood, Creekridge Estates.
As a result of some objection from neighborhood residents, the city has
requested that a simple majority approval from Creekridge Estates residents
be obtained prior to any development.
The park, if approved, will be located south of South Coon Creek Drive
(SCCD) between the golf course entrance and the last developed lot west of
that entrance. Park development will result in the clearing and
redevelopment of a 100'xl00' area and the construction of a 725' sidewalk on
either the north or south side of SCC~. All funding for this development
has been obtained from the city and state (no special assessment will be
imposed). The city's public works depa~tffient is recommending sidewalk
installation on the north side of SCCD for several reasons including:
improved t~affic visibility (some trees may have to be removed eyen if a
sideo,;alk is not installed); snow removal considerations; and, safety
considerations for pedestrian crossing of SCCD.
Further information about the proposed park and sidervalk develop:;ient may be
obtained by contacting Ci ty Hall (755-5100). fie do not have specific
information about the park and sidewalk development.
Please complete and return the attached questionnaire to one of the
following neighborhood residents by 7/30/90 at 8 p.m.:
Beckes Residence
Enockson Residence
Mattson Residence
Murdy Residence
Simpson R~sidence
IJeis ResidencE
Zinken Residence
1448~ Jonquil St ~1J
14410 Kerry St mJ
14391 Jonquil St NV
144Z1 Jonquil St ~,
144~J Jonquil St ~w
14471 K.:ny St H10i
14605 Jonquil St mi
The neighbors identified above are not petitioning for or against this
development. They have volunteered to accept the completed questionnaires
to simplify the collection of this information. IJe are assumin~ that
failure to return this questionnaire or make your opinion known will be
considered a NO vote for both the park and sidel.;alk develop;r.ents.
I -
The city has requested that this info~mation be returned by 7/31/90. They
-;ould like to evalua te the resul ts pdor to a mee til1g to be held on 8/7/90
at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall. You will Qe informed of this meeting by the
city. lle do not know iJhat the agenda for this meeting is but are assuming
that the final decision, on whether to proceed vith this development, will
be made.
"-
,~
Curt & Deb :1urdy
Neighborhood Key Communicators
- y<V \
'r"~jYq", ~Q ·
~ -\- \)0"
_ t'
, )
-/
Neighborhood Park Questionnaire
Name
Address:
Do you approve of development of a neighborhood park
in the Creekr-idge Estates housing development? YES NO
If YES, do you or members of your far;:ily intend
to use this park? YES NO_
Development of this park Ifill NOT take place Iii thou tins talla tion of a-
side.alk on either the north or south side of South Coon Creek Drive. If
you oppose construction of this sidelialk, you MUST vote NO to the park. You
may vote for the sidewalk even if you oppose the park (this vote will help
deternine which side of South Coon Creek Drive Ilill get the sidewalk if park
develop~ent is apprcved).
Do you approve of construction of a side'.,alk on
-South Coon Creek Drive?
YES NO_
If YES, which side of South Coon Creek Drive
do you reccr;:mend the side"ralk be installed?
North____ South____
~.'
Comments or Concerns:
~ Signature & Date:
,_/
'" 70-13
&~~JU~ ~ E.$1'l:l ~$ 1M/v
.It
.I.~,~"",~l<"""""'r~_\.
-~)( , \
, \. ,)
'<~./
'''?-t<:-.<::"c:::>''
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
July 26, 1990
Owner/Occupant
Re: Development of Creek ridge Estates Park and
proposed Sidewalk Construction
Dear owner/occupant:
The City Council has requested the residents of Creekridge
Estates to attend a meeting on Tuesday, August 7, 1990 at
7:30 p.m. regarding the development of the neighborhood park
located along South Coon Creek Drive which is adjacent to your
development and Woodland Creek Golf Course.
The City is in the process of obtaining the necessary permits
from the u.s. Army Corps of Engineers and the Coon Creek
Watershed District for the development of the park. In addition,
the City is considering construction of a sidewalk along South
Coon Creek Drive either on the south side of the street or the
north side using funds that are available from the state of
Minnesota. Without the sidewalk it will be very difficult to be
able to get residents to the park without trespassing on private
property. As you are all aware, South Coon Creek Drive will have
higher traffic volumes than the local streets on which many of
the residents currently live.
The Park and Recreation Commission has budgeted the following
items for installation during the summer of 1990:
- 2 picnic tables
- Wood railing fence
- Class V walkway
- 1 Durascape (playground equipment)
Your comments and/or concerns will be greatly appreciated at this
time.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 755-5100.
Sincerely,
-jdd.j~
.J
Todd J. Haas
Assistant City Engineer/parks
TJH:kmt
~)
I ,-+00 t
~-)
~
~ 0
i3 ~
~!~~ ~
~=:~ ~
... ~ 't... ~
<;:,:::"'15 ~
~~~~ ,
~!"~~ ~
~;i~
~",i~ !
~~; ~
.,.
~:..
OpT"l~N
~/
IJ~~
fro f 0" t:J
.~
,
,
,I
::1 ;:.
~l, ~
I : ~ :
I ~~ ~
t ~8!"o
: ~:f ~
I""'....
~
~
"
jf'....< '~..
I '~\ \~
l~ 'b..\ '':",
I': .... ...~\ \ I
l ti"...<\..\ '\!i! ~
1.J!.'.~!'1'}- o"'~)
--=.:-J
~-~~~;:: !
Ip l\) ..~. \.
r .......~:'\, ,
!!UtJ 'I~',~ \
~-s;"jni'l~i \'0.
18:::::: ~I
L '*I.JO..!l ~?-\:t
r==- - Jt>i,
I~ , --~ ~~2
'& Cl & ,'''''''
L__'41_~ J "'
r.. --,
la -IQ--' ~I
.....__....!UJO "J
r -----~
~t ~ ~I
_~~~~-.:J
r..-;;';';;;;l-' '0
Ig""'" ~I
l..::_..!".l'D _SJ
r -1
:~ 0) ~I
L~__'!t!O _~
~! ~ tJ,,-'
cl'" '& gl ~
--.~ L__'u,o ~ ~
~~ r.. ~---~-] ~
: jg '" ..
, ~_...!."'!'O._~
'~"\
-.\
I
~ ,,'
~ : <:...
I~J ..r ~
1';--'" ~: ()
~ ] l::::
L. mJO J ~
~S';:;~/",F" i ~
:.. f(l ~].' ~
L u/~O j ~ ~.
r 1 ~
It ...... I ,r.
,& c., 0
C_..1"'!'" _J ~
fi' '.","t;T'itl
Ig ~l i" ~'
r,1'.'--~- "':
..;:./l...!~,o $J
"-
0)
: .r {//N~.Or.J:."':}'lO
~,t-T-_---':""'-~ro
Ii............:;:
I ". ~H~'''sCC ~:... r:: ~il'
~-::-_-.:1-:.:::l
l& i\s: ~~l
L:._-'!".Y.l_~
ias.-,'o,;;tn'
IQ ::::1 ~I
L_-!".!.~' ~
1- - .::.t-;:.,
Ig C)I:;I
~~
ii----t;'(!-l
'& <0 V~.,
~==~/I- ~j+
I~ -,,:-....
18 Q;)'i-"I~l
t.::_...!~~~
..
V)
~I ~
~
'i
,
~
"
V)
~
~
'i
~=
~~
~.
.'
,.
..
.'
"
:~
,"
"
"
:9
,.
.-
~,~
"
~...
~
.
,
~
.
,
~
,
,
,
~
r, ~
Ia, ""If'.'
18 "'\j~'"
t..;_...!~!.l\-
,~ -;':;1"
~~ ",,;!
..._ ---''-i ~
. r
, ]!
'8
~
r
:~ ....
~_-!'!!!!
~
.
,
~
.
~ "-
,
~
~
-
"
~
~
.
~
.
-'
~
,
,
'"
,. ~-.
I,."e.. .
. L E"fl(!!. ~ >,~~.u<L/k ~
, bVh"(Id UvJv.)
be... /~,) "<CC' +
~)
J
~
~
~
~~~~
!~~~
~;~i
~~:~
~::~~
~~i~
~~;
...~.~
"
,
,
"
I.'
r
Ii:
,<
\"\
. ,
]
"
t;] :
I"" 1
led ;:
I~~"""" 'I
L_...!~n<?_J
"
>-:- U9""nl}""l
~~ :~, ....... I
~_.~~~J
[" u;"!7"F:l
I~, f\, ~l
I;), r\) ilir
L_..!....U!!L_...J
~ tol~ ~tl
~_-!'.!~_J ~_..!~~_~
o
'i S....li1"1-;1
:&~1. iO ~:
k~-,~;Jj
r Sf".viT"'c I
I"' 1\)" :=:1
,~ <:) ...- 8'
is - - \\t.__~t
L_'!!~_~;.,J
~
~
l
~
~
.
~
~
,
r -,
l~ -\6---'- tl
~__-'~!.O__~
r -,
l~ co tl
@_...!~~-~
SIl~'"C
t/45/h AVE. N.w.t
J"'."r""('
--
r..-u;'Y>>-~tl
1<)""'" al
~_-'''.l.~__J
~ -0') -tl
L~__,!.!!.~_~
<J)
=ti
~
'i
ft ~~'t
:~__/!!~O__~ ~
, , ~
,.. ~ tl
,g gr
L?_...!.....!.'l'~ ._-J
~
.
,
~
,
,
,
~
,
.'
~,
d~
"
"':'>0
"',0;
"
:
,
~
~
"
r 1
i~ t-, ~]
~_..!~~_J
~
1- ,,,"in,.,-'
:t l ~ !:
~_J!!!t.o_':J
r,[ -,
,t I 'i::- tl
18 "Wt. ~l
L- ____:.I
,
~
~
~
"
,
~
.
~'
,
.~
.,,-,
OPT/aN
:ft'
2-
.'
t.;
\:..; j
\... ..'
I ..... ~I
I 0) al
(( I (),
, I
~ :, ]
~ l~ I
~ L-_-'!H:"__J
"t'", r
~ ~
:. ~
:::- ....
,
, i1
~~ ~
~8: .
: ~- ~
, lIE' ~
~
"
.
"
<J)
=ti
~
'I
(;'":- .:1-::;:'1
:~ t\i: ;~I
~_-'!:'''.!-1._~
,
~ J"'~'r"i1
,:go " . ~I
L_-!'.!..."!l_:J
1-- -~-;:;:l
Ig al i:
~__'!_~'!'l ~
." $. t1/V~ or ,,,,,; 10
i sU."'.T:J"."'~
. l:;__ -.;:~;~~
i " 'lIVE 0,. rNE /VE.
INE SE '/4 C" S((
~:
~~
~r;:
"
..
,
>-
~~
'8
~,
:S
,.
"
~~
.'
"
~,
.~
~
~
~
~
.
,
"
~
,
.~
~
.
.
.
<
~
,
~ l-s.';:"I',rl"~
....!~ H~~~ &1
-----1--
r - -r :l
I~ 0)1 ~l
@__,!!d _~
"-
~~
~i'
,
,
,
"
~."\ "":, I
~ , '. J J ,] ,
. I \ .... ~]
~ Dl ,\ \ 0\ g] ,
, <:..: , I : ~
I ~ I. I ~~ ~
l'lt I ], ]
ISJ i: ]~ I ~8 !'>
~ ]
"- I'r..... 'i L_...!!H.~__J :l::~
~
L....;...!~!~_J .t-'. ' li ~
, \ , ~l-,"~:9~~ill ~ ~"~";'t ~ ~ ~ ~
/ '\ f ,;
'oJ ~-s~ir'~-tl " ~~.:~~ J I~ "I ~ ~, ~
'bi' L_ u;..?"_...J " r
L~_~..~,~_~ r 1 r - 1
~ J It Ci;! It ~ tr
r~--.:--:-~ ,~.
'~' ~_~~~~_J ~-~~~-~
Lg__~~__~ " ,
~ 0 '<;: ~ J~"'.~.(~ r J1\;~';'t I S, LINT ",. '(>1'; to
~ I' \. ~I JU; "', lJ"."-"~,
~ r:------, jlL", ~ ~I :~ Cl ... 8\ J;__=CL,," i;__ ~::,:':;~
e~~~ l~ -~--. ~ LfY~~;-_S; I --- ;\"t..~l
, ~---,~~--g L_~~_~::J ;g i\5t ;Cl "III. ('NF (}F 'He Ne
i..'1~ L:_--'!:'.o!-1._~ 'He Jl f/~ 0' JH
;;:a...... ~ r------., NU:'~ \
"',,--
:~:~ ~ I~ Q;) tl ~ J.'~~r("i1
i;:;::: ~ @_-!~~-~ ~_.!~~~~
~~i' ..
~ ft-~.;;)T-t~l V) 1-- --+;;:,
~~il V) ]g ~IW ~:
~~; ~ t.?_..!.~.L~__J =il =il ~~ ~~
-,. r------l
~." tt 0') ~I ~ ~ ,-----t:,.-;.;] ~~
It IoV t, "
L~__'!!.!'!.-_~ ..
'f 'f ~_--'~~1- 81 ,
'"
, r.-------, ~~
.' it ~........... ~1 1 . ~ Q;)~tj
"' ~ ~g
~ Q~ l~__'..!!~-!l!.._~ , ~-.1~cl-~ "
" " , . . ~r::
. ~~ r------, :; " -, . ~ .-
, ~, It -t.. tl . r-- t---, ,.
~ ~ ;t J.'.~r"~t .-
, ~_~:'.!.'J~__~ ~
, " 3_-,~~' _~ ~~
~ ~,
i r------l "
I! ~ ~: ~'"
i
~ ~-..!!!.~_...J ~
~
i
,
~
'-:'
.,n
,\,",,',n
#-'
opr,,,1./ 3
.'
, '
)
.~,) I
~
~
,.J
L--
\ T-
~' - I
! VI r-... I
. I 11 I
I L- --
. -- "-
I ~G I M
I .~ -...
I -V- .
, ~ o~J.l
~~
~
1
I
!
i
~
T
,
I
~
<::l
fYJ
~
~ It'" ,r
J II
\ If) -r--, .' i
, '1 !' I
I . I I
, .:L..- r -- i
; -.l, -..; \
, ."
; 0 <j:l- ! -
! r.I "0- I ('11
: o~--4I-
I (;) ~~
I":., -.:J"
! - Q
t-:
~
-r---
...
~
--
~
o
f-
~
U1
Vl
Z
4:
cO
at.
:s
,..
<
~ M
" ~
~~
':::, 'SJ..........
~
~
'~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 7, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
#
Todd J. Haas
ITEM
NO.
3. Ken Heil Sketch
plan
BY:
The city Council is requested to review the proposed sketch plan
of Kenneth Heil.
The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the sketch plan
and their comments are as follows:
General Comments:
* The proposed sketch plan is located in an R-4 Single Family
Urban zoning district with minimum lot size requirement of
11,400 square feet. Nine (9) lots are being proposed.
* Lot 5, Block 1 will require variances for the following:
- Variance from Ordinance 10, Section 9.02(c) to allow the lot
to front onto Andover Boulevard (County State Aid Highway No.
16) .
- Variance from Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 as the required
setback along any major arterial is 40 feet.
NOTE: - All buildings (shed, storage buildings, etc.) will be
required to meet all setback requirements.
* Proposed right-of-way dedication for Andover Boulevard is 60
feet. County has recommended as development occurs that the
right-of-way width be at least 60 feet from the centerline of
the roadway.
* It is staff's interpretation that Lots 2 and 8 of Block 1 will
require variance for lot depth from Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 as
the lot depth mean is less than 130 feet.
continued
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
~
Page Two
August 7, 1990
Item #3
* Lot 7 of Blqck 1 will be a problem regarding the 100 front
building pad. The buried wood is within the 100 front building
pad area and would be in violation of city policy. The intent
is to have the pad area to allow the homeowner to build decks or
to enlarge a home at some time in the future. The developer has
indicated this debris would be removed to satisfy this
requirement.
* Lot 4 of Block 1 indicates a shed that will be removed by the
property owner. The building is unsightly.
* Length of the cul-de-sac is approximately 250 feet. Extending
the cul-de-sac to Andover Boulevard may not be possible due to
the pond in Lot 5, Block 1.
* The sketch plan will eventually be served with sewer and water.
Currently a petition is being circulated through the area of
Hartfiel's Estates for these improvements.
* The developer is required to meet City Ordinances 8 and 10 and
all other applicable ordinances.
,~
'.
"
,.. vI) -
eOf.!J T-: r,'m $.- c.t; '"':;l'"
:r"(j B. - PI(l~(1e..
dill'-cd - 7~,"""'<.3
Oo..vQ, 11- 81.1I' 'dl~
COUNTY OF ANOKA
Department of Highways
Paul K. RlIlId, Highway Engineer
1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW, ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 612-754-3520
~' ."" t:' r~-~r.:' ,: ';' L,."..--::
fj ~ Q.,.' ,.. It; ~ ;L.
g ~~~ ~~~lUf
I r. I.
- !
CITY OF ANDOVER
March 6, 1990
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, MN. 55304
Attention: Jim Schrantz
City Administrator/City Engineer
Subject:
County Rights-of-Way
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
Several years ago, we delivered to you, a letter outlining the county's desires
for rights-of-way for segments of the county highway system, that are located within
your city. Several weeks ago, you asked for an update of that letter in light of
current conditions and what we foresee comIng in the way of roadway
improvements.
It is our recommendation that as development occurs along segments of the
county road system in tbe City of Andover, that a rigbt-of-way widtb of at least 60
feet from the centerline of the roadway, be provided as a part of any plattin~ or lot
splits. In tbe past, we had talked of 150 foot right-of-way and it is our be!lef that
ngbt-of-way acquisition has been achieved on Hanson Boulevard and tbat the otber
county roads within the city will be served adequately by 120 feet of right-of-way.
The cooperation that the county has received over the years from tbe cities
and townships within the county has been a real asset to the implementation of
projects by the county and we trust that we will be able to continue that cooperative
effort with your city in seeing that the adequate ri~bts-of-ways are provided at the
time of development, so that the cost of acquisition at some future date can be
eliminated.
Very truly yours,
~ /~~~l
Paul K. Ruud, PE
County' Engineer
~J dmh/CITY AND
Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 7, 1990
ITEM
NQ 4. Ordinance 8,
Sec. 8 08 Am
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT aa ~J
Engineering V
d'Arcy Bosell ~~\r~~v~
BY: J! BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
The city Council is requested to review and approve the amendment
to Ordinance No.8 (Zoning Ordinance), Section 8.08, which relates
to parking requirements.
Attached please find a copy of the Public Hearing Notice and a
copy of the amendment to Ordinance 8, Section 8.08. Also,
attached to the amendment is a chart showing various setbacks and
curb cut requirements. This chart will become part of the
Ordinance amendment.
Many parts of this section of the ordinance needed updating with
many of the parts that have not been updated since the ordinance
was adopted in 1970.
One of the reasons for the amendment is the City was not able to
force Woodland Creek Golf Course to install concrete curbs and
gutters in the parking lot which currently has bituminous curbing.
At the same time the entire section of the ordinance was then
reviewed and updated.
In reviewing the ordinance, Maple Grove appeared to have the most
reasonable parking requirements. A side by side comparison was
made and eventually the two sections were combined into one.
Other communities that were reviewed were Coon Rapids, Blaine,
Fridley, Maple Grove and Eden Prairie. Eden prairie was too
restrictive.
If you have questions regarding this item, please contact me at
City Hall.
NOTE: Staff has contacted Blueline collission and Jim Trapp,
owner of the proposed building that will be leased to M & S
Sheetrock, regarding the proposed amendment. A copy of the
draft was given to Mr. Trapp and that the Commercial site
plan should include the requirements.
COUNCIL ACTION
" '\
'-J
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
',/.
~
)
.tA.
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning & zoning Commission of the City of Andover. will hold
a public hearing at 7:30 pm, or as soon thereafter as can be
heard, on Tuesday, July 24, 1990, at the Andover, City Hall, 1685
NW Crosstown Boulevard, Andover, MN, to consider an amendment to
Ordinance No.8 (zoning Ordinance), Section 8.08 Parking
Requirements.
Interested parties of said proposal will be heard at the above
time and location. A copy of the proposed amendment is available
for inspection at City Hall during regular business hours. '
/' .
~Uk
victoria Volk, City
Clerk
. publication Dates:
July 13, 1990
July 20, 1990
n
'CJ
Draft - 24 July 1990
<J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COU~TY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE 8
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA.
The city of Andover does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 8.08 Parking Requirements
A. Purpose. The regulation of off-street parking spaces in these
zoning regulations is to alleviate or prevent congestion of the
public right-of-way and to promote the safety and general welfare of
the public by establishing minimum requirements for off-street
parking of motor vehicles in accordance with the utilization of
various parcels of land or structures.
B. Application of Off-Street Parking Regulations. The regulations
and requirements set forth herein shall apply to all off~street
parking facilities including driveways, parking lots and storage
areas, in all of the zoning districts of the City.
C. Site Plan Drawing Necessary. All applications for a building
permit or Certificate of Occupancy in all zoning districts shall be
accompanied by a site plan drawn to scale and dimensioned indicating
the location of the driveway, off-street parking and loading spaces,
and storage areas in compliance with the requirements set forth in
this Section.
D. General Provisions.
1. Floor Area. The term "floor area" for the purpose of
calculating the number of off-street parking spaces
required shall be determined on the basis of the exterior
floor area dimensions of the buildings, structure or use.
It shall not include areas used primarily as utility rooms,
maintenance areas, rest rooms, fitting rooms, alteration
rooms, window display areas or lobbies
2. Change of Use or Occupancy of Land. No change of use or
occupancy of land already dedicated to a parking area,
parking spaces, or loading spaces shall be made, nor shall
any sale of land, division or subdivision of land be made
which reduces area necessary for parking, parking stalls,
or parking requirements below the minimum prescribed by
these.zoning regulations.
3.
Change of Use or Occupancy of Buildin~s. Any change of use
or occupancy of any building or buildIngs including
additions thereto requiring more parking area shall not be
permitted until there is furnished such additional parking
spaces as required by these zoning regulations.
,-\
'J
~)
.J
Draft - 24 July 1990
Page 2
4 .
Use of Parking Area
Permitted Uses:
(a) Driveways and off-street parking facilities accessory
to residential use shall be utilized solely for the parking
of licensed and operable passenger automobiles; no more
than one (1) truck not to exceed gross capacity of twelve
thousand (12,000) pounds; and recreational vehicles and
equipment.
(b) In an R-1 or R-2 Single Family Residential District on
a parcel of at least three (3 a.) acres in size, one (1)
truck-tractor may be stored within an accessory building.
Under no circumstances shall the required parking
facilities allow for the parking of semi-trailers.
Prohibited Uses:
(c) Under no circumstances shall required parking
facilities accessory to residential structures be used for
the storage of commercial vehicles or equipment or for the
parking of vehicles belonging to the employees, owners,
tenants, or customers of business or manufacturing
establishments.
.'.,
(d) Required off-street parking space in any district
shall not be utilized for the open storage of goods or for
the storage of vehicles which are inoperable, for sale or
rent.
5. . Calculating Space.
(a) When determining the number of off-street parking
spaces, fractional results of one-half (1/2) or more shall
constitute another space.
(b) In stadiums, sports arenas, churches and other places
of public assembly. in which patrons or spectators occupy
benches, pews or other similar seating facilities, each
twenty-two (22") inch~s of such seating facilities shall be
counted as one (1) seat for the purpose of determining
requirements.
(c) On a structure containing two (2) or more types of use,
each use shall be calculated separately to determine the
total number of off-street parking spaces required, except
as provided for under Joint parking and Shopping Centers.
E. Stall, Aisle and Driveway Design.
1. parking Space Size.
Parking spaces shall not be less than ten (10') feet wide
by eighteen (18') feet in length exclusive of access
aisles, and.each space shall be adequately served by an
access aisle.
Page 3
':~)
,J
Draft - 24 July 1990
2.
Design, Residential
(a) Parking areas shall be designed so that circulati9n
between parking bays or aisles occurs within the designated
parking lot and does not depend upon a public street or
alley, except in the case of a single-family, two-family,
townhouse and quadraminium dwellings.
(b) Parking area design which requires backing onto the
public street is prohibited, except in the case of single-
family, two-family, townhouse and quadraminium dwellings.
3. Curb Cut Standards
(a) No curb cut access shall be located less than sixty
(60') feet from the intersection of two (2) or more street
right-of-ways. This distance shall be measured from the
intersection of lot lines.
(b) All proposed curb cuts along a County road must be
reviewed and approved by the County Highway Department.
(c) No non-residential curb cut access shall exceed thirty
(30') feet in width unless approved by the City Engineer.
(d) No residential curb cut access shall exceed twenty-
four (24') feet in width unless approved by the City
Engineer.
(e) Curb cut openings and driveways shall be a minimum of
ten (10') feet from the side yard property line in all
classes of Business, Industrial, or Multi-family
Residential Districts
(f) Curb cut openings and driveways shall be a minimum of
five (5') feet from the side yard property line in all
Residential Districts (R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5).
(g) Driveway access curb openings on a public street
shall not be located less than forty (40') feet from one
another, except for single-family, two-family,
quadraminiums and townhouse dwellings,
(h) All property shall be entitled to one (1) curb
cut/access ~nless otherwise specified herein.
(1) All commercial/industrial use property shall be
allowed one (1) curb cut/access for each one hundred
twenty-five (125') feet of street frontage.
(2) Multiple dwelling units shall be limited to one
(1) curb cut/access for each one hundred twenty-five
(125') feet of street frontage unless otherwise
approved by the City pursuant to a Planned Unit
Development.
(3) No residential primary curb cut/access shall be
created directly onto any street of collector status
or greater unless approved by the City Engineer.
page 4
,-)
" ---'
"
,-.J
Draft - 24 July 1990
(4) No residential accessory curb cut/access shall be
permitted directly onto any street unless approved by
the city Engineer.
(i) The attached chart summarizes the Curb-Cut Standards
as adopted.
4. Aisle Standards
(a) Aisles adjacent to or giving access to perpendicular
parking spaces or diagonal parking spaces having angles of
less than 90 degrees but greater than 60 degrees shall be
at least twenty-four (24') feet in width.
(b) Aisles adjacent to or giving access to parking spaces
having angles of 60 degrees or less shall be at least
twenty (20') feet in width.
(c) Drives providing circulation between parking bays or
aisles shall have a minimum inside turning radius of
sixteen (16') feet for drives used by passenger vehicles
and ~ minimum inside turning radius of twenty-five (25')
feet for drives used by semi-trailers or single unit
delivery trucks.
5. Parking Lot, Driveway and Aisle Grades
The grade elevation of any parking area, driveway and
aisles shall not be less than one (1%) percent and shall
not exceed five (5%) percent.
6. Surfacing.
All driveways, off-street driving, loading, parking and
storage areas shall be surfaced in accordance with the
standard specifications as adopted by the City and on file
in the office of the City Engineer.
(a) Farm dwellings and farm operations are exempt from
this paving requirement.
(b) storage areas for heavy construction equipment that
would damage the pavement may be exempt from the paving and
surfacing requirement with an acceptable surface approved
by the City Engineer.
7.
(c) plans for surfacing and drainage of driveways for non-
residential uses shall be submitted to the City Engineer
for review and the final plan shall be subject to written
approval.
Striping.
Except for single-family, two-family, townhouse and
quadraminium dwellings, all parking stalls shall be marked
with white or yellow painted lines not less than four (4")
inches wide.
Draft - 24 July 1990
Page 5
:)
8.
Lighting.
(a) All off-street parking areas for residential uses of
twelve (12) or more spaces and all off-street parking for
commercial, industrial, institutional, and public uses
shall be equipped with operable lighting designed to
illuminate the entire surface of the parking area to a
minimum level of one (1) foot-candle at ground level.
shall not apply to neighborhood parks as identified in
Andover Comprehensive Park System and Recreation Plan,
amended.
This
the
as
(b) Any lighting used to illuminate the off street parking
area shall be arranged as to reflect the light away from
adjoining property.
9. Curbing.
All driveways, loading areas, parking areas and storage
areas shall be bounded by poured-in-place concrete curb and
gutter, except for single-family, two-family, townhouse and
quadriminium dwellings.
(a) The City may exempt curbing where the City ha~'
approved future expansion of the parking lot.
(b) Poured-in-place concrete traffic safety islands may be
required to maintain a safe and orderly flow of traffic
within the parking lot and shall be approved by the City
Engineer.
F. Required Screening.
All off-street parking lots containing six (6) or more spaces,
shall be screened from those residential properties abutting the
property on which the parking lot is located, except such lots
which serve single-family attached or detached units.
1. Screening Standards. Screening shall be installed so as to
block direct vision.
(a) Screening shall consist of a compact evergreen or
deciduous hedge of sufficient width and density or an earth
berm of sufficient height to provide an effective screen
throughout the year.
(1) At planting, hedge material must be at least
three (3') feet in height.
"
'-~
(2) Deciduous trees must be at least five (5') feet
in height and two and one-half (2 1/2") inches in
diameter as measured six (6") inches above the ground.
(3) Coniferous trees must be at least five (5') feet
in height.
Draft - 24 July 1990
Page 6
')
'-.-/
(4) Earth berms shall not have a slope of more than
four (4') feet horizontal to one (1') foot vertical
nor be located within any street right-of-way unless
otherwise approved by the City Engineer.
(b) A required screening fence shall be constructed of
masonry, brick or wood. Such fence shall provide a solid
screening effect and not exceed eight (8') feet in height
or be less than six (6') feet in height. The design and
materials used in constructing a required screening fence
shall be subject to the approval' of the City Council.
G. Maintenance.
It shall be the joint and several responsibility of the leasees
and owner of the principal use, uses or building to maintain in
a neat and adequate manner the driveways, parking spaces,
curbing, accessways, striping, landscaping, and required fences.
H. Location.
All accessory off-street parking facilities required by this
Ordinance shall be located and restricted as follows:
'"
1. Required accessory off-street parking shall be on the same
lot under the same ownership as the principal use being
served,
2. Head-in parking, directly off of and adjacent to a public
street, with each stall having its own direct access to the
public street, shall be prohibited, except for single-
family, two-family, townhouse and quadraminium dwellings.
3. In business districts, there shall be no off-street parking
within twenty (20') feet of any street surface.
4. On non-residential parcels, the boulevard portion of the
street right-of-way shall not be used for parking.
5. Setback Area. In all classes of Business, Industrial or
Multi-family Residential Districts, required off-street
parking and all other uses shall not be provided in the
following setback areas:
Front Yard:
20 feet
Side Yard:
10 feet (at least 20 feet if abutting
existing or future right-of-way or if
abutting a residential district)
Rear Yard:
10 feet
Exception:
The requirements of subparagraphs above
may be deleted if, in the city
Engineer's opinion, a parking lot is an
integral part of a parking lot on an
adjoining parcel of property.
)
Page 7
,r~
,-.,J
6.
Draft - 24 July 1990
In the case of single-family, two-family, townhouse and
quadraminium dwellings parking shall be prohibited in any
portion of the front yard except designated driveways
leading directly into a garage and one (1) open, surfaced
space located contiguous to the side of a driveway, away
from the principal use. Said extra space shall be surfaced
as provided in Section E (6) herein.
I. Number of Spaces Required. The following minimum number of off-
street parking spaces shall be provided and maintained by
ownership for the respective uses hereinafter set forth:
1. and
.,J
2 .
Bowlina Alley. Five (5) parking spaces for each alley,
plus a ditional spaces as may be required herein for
related uses contained within the principal structure.
3.
Car Wash.
(In addition to required stacking spaces).
Serviced. Ten (10) spaces,
oyee on the maximum shift,
(a)
(b) Self-Service. A minimum of two (2) spaces.
(c) Motor Fuel Station Car Wash. Zero in addition to that
required for the station.
4 .
5. Church, Theatre, Auditorium. One (1) parking space for
each three (3) seats based on the design capacity of the
main assembly hall. Facilities as may be provided in
conjunction with such buildings or uses shall be subject to
additional requirements which are imposed by this
Ordinance.
6. Drive-In Establishment and Convenience Food. One (1)
parking space for each one hundred fifty (150) square feet
of gross floor area, but not less than fifteen (15) spaces.
Page 8
:/-)
'--/
7.
8.
Draft - 24 July 1990
Elderl(Senior Citizen) Housin Reservation of area
equa to one par lng space per unit. Initial
development is, however, required of only one-half (1/2)
space per unit and said number of spaces can continue until
such time as the City Council considers a need for
additional parking spaces has been demonstrated.
10.
9. Hospitals. Two (2) spaces per each bed.
11. Motels, Motor Hotels, Hotels. One (1) space per each
rental unit plus one (1) space for each ten (10) units and
one (1) additional space for each employee on any shift.
12. Motor Fuel Station. Four (4) off-street parking spaces
plus two (2) additional off-street parking spaces for each
service stall. Those facilities designed for sale of other
items than strictly automotive products, parts or service
shall be required to provide additional parking in
compliance with other applicable sections of this
Ordinance.
13. Office Buildings, Professional Offices and Clinics.
One (1)
square feet of
less than three (3)
(b) Clinics. Clinics (including, but not limited to,
dental or medical offices, veterinary clinics and animal
hospitals) shall provide one (1) space for each one hundred
and fifty (150) square feet of floor area or fraction
thereof, but not less than three (3) spaces per lot design.
14. Sporting and Health Clubs. One (1) space per 100 square
feet of building area, plus six spaces per
tennis/racquetball or other type of court.
Residential, Multiple Family Dwellin6s. Two (2) spaces per
unit, at least one of which spaces s all be in an enclosed
garage, plus one-half space per unit for visitor's parking.
16. Residential, Sin le-Famil , Two-Famil , Townhouse and
Qua ramlnlum Unlts. Two (2 spaces per unlt, ln a ltion
to required garage.
15.
.~
Page 9
'~J
,J
Draft - 24 July 1990
17.
18. Service Business with Fifty Percent (50%)
Floor Area Devoted to Stora e, Warehouses
Elg t spaces or one ( ) space or
each two hundred (200) square feet devoted to public sales
or service plus one (1) additional space for each five
hundred (500) square feet of storage area; or at least
eight (8) spaces or one (1) additional space for each
employee on the maximum shift, whichever is greater.
19.' Retail Store and Service Establishment. One (1) off-street
parking space for each two hundred (200) square feet of
floor area.
20. Sanitarium, Convalescent Home, Rest Home, Nursin Home or
Day Nursery. Four spaces p us one or eac ree
(3) beds for which accommodations are 'offered.
21. Hi h. One (1) parking space
a ditional space for each
22. or
23. Shopping Centers
(a) Basic Requirement
(1) Small Centers - Four hundred thousand (400,000)
square feet or less of gross leaseable floor area
(GLA): Four (4) spaces per one thousand (1,000) square
feet of GLA or portion thereof.
(2) Medium Centers - Greater than four hundred
thousand (400,000) square feet up to and including six
hundred thousand (600,000) square feet of GLA: Four
and one half (4.5) spaces per one thousand (1,000)
square feet of GLA or portion thereof.
(3) Large Centers - Greater than six hundred thousand
(600,000) square feet of GLA: Five (5) spaces per one
thousand (1,000) square feet of GLA or portion
thereof.
Page 10
C)
24.
25.
26.
27.
Draft - 24 July 1990
(b) Shopping Centers with Cinemas
(1) Centers of one hundred thousand (100,000) square
feet or less of GLA: add three (3) additional spaces
for each one hundred (100) cinema seats or fraction
thereof to the basic requirements.
(2) Centers having greater than one hundred thousand
(100,000) square feet up to and including two hundred
thousand (200,000) square feet of GLA: add to the
basic requirement three (3) spaces for each one
hundred (100) cinema seats or additional fraction
thereof above four hundred and fifty (450).
(3) Centers having greater than two hundred thousand
(200,000) square feet of GLA: add to the basic
requirement three (3) spaces for each one hundred
(100) cinema seats or additional fraction thereof
above seven hundred and fifty (750).
Skatin Rink (Private), Dance Hall, or Public Auction
House. Twenty 0) 0 -street par lng spaces, p us one (1)
additional off-street parking space for each two hundred
(200) square feet of floor space over two thousand (2,000)
square feet.
Warehousing, storage or Handling of Bulk Goods. That space
which is solely used as office shall comply with the office
use requirements and one (1) additional space for each two
thousand (2,000) square feet of floor area or fraction
thereof, plus one (1) additional space for each employee on
maximum shift and one (1) additional space for each company
owned truck (if not stored inside principal building).
undertakiny Establishments. Twenty (20) parking spaces for
each chape or parlor, plus one (1) additional space for
each funeral vehicle maintained on the premises. Aisle
spacing shall also be provided off the street for making up
a funeral procession.
other Uses. Other uses not specifically mentioned herein
shall be determined on an individual basis by the City
Council. Factors to be considered in such determination
shall include (without limitation) size of building, type
of use, number of employees, expected volume and turnover
of customer traffic and expected frequency and number of
delivery or service vehicles.
28. keduced Parking Facilities. When demonstrated to the
satisfaction of the City Council that up to ten percent
(10%) of the number of parking spaces required by this
Ordinance would not be needed for the particular use in
question, a reduced number of parking spaces may be
approved subject to the following:
'\
'J
Draft - 24 July 1990
Page 11
~-~
~
(a) The application for reduction shall be accompanied by
supporting data specifically applying to the particular use
in question or showing a lesser national standard.
(b) The applicant must also provide each of the following.
(1) A detailed parking plan demonstrating that the
parking otherwise required by this Ordinance can be
provided on the site within ordinance design
standards; and
(2) A covenant in recordable form, approved as to
form and content by the City Attorney, executed by all
property owners, which covenant provides that the
owners, heirs, successors and assigns, will not use
the area identified for expansion parking for any use
except landscaping or to cause compliance with the
off-street parking requirements of this Ordinance.
(c) The City may order installation of previously exempted
parking spaces at any time when, in the City's judgement,
conditions indicate the need for such parking, and the
property owner shall comply with said order.
J. Joint Facilities.
Off-street parking facilities for a combination of mixed
buildings, structures or uses may be provided collectively in
any business of recreational district in which separate parking
facilities for each separate building, structure or use would be
required, provided that the total number of spaces provided
shall equal the sum of the separate requirements of each use,
during any peak hour parking period, subject to the following
conditions:
1. The building or use for which application is being made to
utilize the off-street parking facilities provided by
another building or use shall be located within three
hundred (300') feet of such parking facilities.
2. There shall be no substantial conflict in the principal
operating hours of the two (2) buildings or uses for which
joint use of off-street parking facilities is proposed.
3. A properly drawn legal instrument, executed by the parties
concerned for joint use of off-street parking facilities,
duly approved as to form and manner of execution by the
City Attorney, shall be filed with the City Clerk and
recorded with the Anoka County Recorder.
,J
Draft - 24 July 1990
Page 12
~)
K.
Off-Site Parking.
1. Any off-site parking which is used to meet the requirements
of this Ordinance shall require a Special Use Permit as
regulated by Section 5.03 of this Ordinance and shall be
subject to.the conditions listed herein.
2. Off-site parking shall be developed and maintained in
compliance with all requirements and standards of this
Ordinance.
3. Reasonable access from off-site parking facilities to the
use being served shall be provided.
4. The site used for meeting the off-site parking requirements
of this Ordinance shall be under the same ownership as the
principal use being served.
5. Off-site parking for multiple family dwellings shall not be
located more than one hundred (100') feet from the
principal use served.
6. Off-site parking for non-residential uses. shall not be
located more than three hundred (300') feet from the main
entrance of the principal use being served. No more than
one (1) main entrance shall be recognized for each
principal building.
7. Any use which depends upon off-site parking to meet the
requirements of this Ordinance shall maintain ownership and
parking utilization of the off-site location until such
time as on-site parking is provided or a site in closer
proximity to the principal use is acquired and developed
for parking.
Adopted this day of
the City Council of the City of Andover.
, 1990, by
CITY OF ANDOVER
James E. Elling, Mayor
ATTEST
~) Victoria volk, City Clerk
:~) Draft - 10 July 1990
Ordinance No. 8, Section 8.08 E (3 )
CURB CUT STANDARDS
Curb Residential Uses** Non-Residential Uses
Cut
Standards R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-5 M-1 M-2 GR NB. GB SC I
.
Maximum
Width 24' 24' 24' 24' 24' 24' 24' 30' 30' 30' 30' 30'
Side Yard
Setback 5' 5' 5 ' 5' 5' 10' 10' 10' '10' 10' 10' 10'
Minimum
Distance
Between
Driveway
Access
Curb
Openings 40' 40' 40' 40' 40'
Number ~
Allowed 1 1 1 1 1 1* 1* 1* 1* 1* 1* 1*
* One (1) curb cut/access for each one hundred twenty-five (125') of street
frontage. Multiple dwelling units shall be limited to one (1) curb
cut/access unless otherwise approved by the City pursuant to a Planned Unit
Development (PUD).
** Residential uses may include single-family homes, two-family homes,
quadraminiums, multiple residences and townhouse dwellings.
Ordinance No. 8, Section 8.08 H (5 )
Off-Street Parking
Setback Area
Residential Uses** Non-Residential Uses
, Area R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-5 M-1 M-2 GR NB GB SC I
Front Yard 20' 20' 20' 20' 20' 20' 20'
Side Yard* 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10'
i Rear Yard 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10'
"
,-~
* Side yard setback shall be at least ten (10') feet if abutting existing or
future right-=of-way or if abutting a residential district.
;';
'---"
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 7, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY:
Engineering
-1f~
ITEM
NO.
5. Ordinance 10,
Sec. 9.03 Amendmen
BY:
The city Council is requested to review and approve the amendment
to Ordinance 10, Section 9.06a(3) regarding minimum lot widths at
building setback for lots that abutt a cul-de-sac. See attached
drawing.
The Andover Review Committee has reviewed these types of plats in
the rural area in the past and have recommended to change the
ordinance which would eliminate the variances.
Ordinance 10, Section 9.06a(3) relates to the lots lacking
municipal sanitary sewer outside the Metropolitan Urban Service
Area.
The Planning and zoning Commission has reviewed the request and
recommends approval of the amendment.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
J TO
SECOND BY
\:~
~7
~V~ /
v/
( (
-"
'-J
I
6 -;c)-fc/ (I.~, m!J,
/Irr..uxi O;d. 6 Idled-
mrntyc m d/..d_-c& 4d~
(ranzL dut:t.p~)
~/,fZ ::.
'1-/ //
/
_.._0_____.____..._._... - ....
......:-;
'\
\
,
"
/
E"X.AV,PLE
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 10, THE SUBDIVISION AND
PLATTING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains:
9.06a(3) Areas Lacking Municipal Sanitary Sewer Outside the
Metropolitan Urban Service Area. In areas which are not served
by municipal sanitary sewer and outside the Metropolitan Urban
Service Area, no residential lot shall be developed for
residential purposes unless it contains a minimum of 108,900
square feet, of which 39,000 square feet of contiguous land area
is buildable with a minimum width of at least one-hundred fifty
(150') feet and a minimum depth of one-hundred fifty (150') feet,
and has a width of at least three hundred (300') feet at the
building setback line except for lots which abutt a cul-de-sac,
the lot width at the setback line is to be a minimum of 160 feet.
Two lots maximum are allowed at the end of each cul-de-sac
regarding the lot width. The preliminary plat shall show a
feasible plan for future re-subdivision by which lots may be re-
subdivided to meet the size and dimension standards of lots in
areas served by municipal sewer. These provisions shall not
apply to plats approved by the City prior to October 17, 1978.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of
, 1990.
CITY OF ANDOVER
James E. Elling - Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
:)
()
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APP~rEflI FOR
AGEl~ -"'\0
BY: V
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Staff, Committee, Comm
ITEM Amend Personnel Policy
NO. #9/Holidays
6.
Administration
U Un 1 t. ,\ .
BY:
As a part of the Union contract all city employees are now
entitled to an additional floating holiday each year.
v
Council is requested to approve the attached amendment to Policy
#9, Holidays.
MOTION BY
,J TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
POLICY NO. 9 - HOLIDAYS
8
I. POLICY
The city of Andover shall provide paid holidays for all
permanent and permanent part-time employees subject to
the provisions of this policy.
II. HOLIDAYS
New Years Day ( January 1)
Martin Luther King Day (3rd Monday in January)
President's Day (3rd Monday in February)
Memorial Day
Independence Day
Labor Day
Veterans Day
Thanksgiving Day
Christmas Day
Floating Day (This day to be determined by Administrator
at beginning of each year)
Floating Day (To be taken at employee's discretion with
approval of supervisor) (Effective 6-19-90)
III. ELIGIBILITY
! .
i
A. Permanent Employees
1. Employees must be employed on a permanent status
on both the last working day before the holiday
and the first working day after the paid holiday.
2. Employees on paid or unpaid sick leave either the
last working day before a holiday or the first
work day after the holiday, or both, will receive
holiday pay.
3. Permanent part-time employees will be paid
holiday pay under the same schedule as permanent
full-time employees, but on a pro-rata basis.
IV. PROCEDURE
A. City Offices will be closed on all holidays.
B. One day's regular pay will be paid to employees for
each holiday for which they are eligible.
C. When a holiday falls on a Saturday, the City will
observe it on the previous day (Friday).
D. When a holiday falls on a Sunday, the City will
observe it on the following day (Monday).
~
E. When a holiday falls within an employee's vacation
period, the employee is entitled to an extra days
vacation. The additional day will be given at a time
mutually agreed upon by the City and employee.
F. Employees shall not be paid for holidays occurring
after the effective date of their resignation.
<)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Auqust 7, 1990
ITEM
NO.
1.
Personnel policy
Amendments
Administration
v. Volk ~\.
APP:~Rm{h E, OR
AGE I'
...:,
BY: J
I
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee, Comm
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY:
In order to make the Administrative Personnel policy consistent
and easier to understand, we have made the following changes:
Definitions: Family has been added. This definition would
apply to Policy No.4, Leaves of Absence, which
refers to funeral leave.
Sick Leave has been removed from the definitions
as it is defined in Policy 3.
Sick Leave:
The circumstances under which sick leave can be
used have been listed in section (K).
Leaves of Absence: Section III, Paid Leaves of Absence" Section
A has been amended , deleting the word
'immediate' and the list of relatives.
Holidays:
Under Procedure, Section F has been added.
Overtime:
Under Provisions,'8 hours per day' was added in
the first sentence. Also added was the statement
that employees will be paid for accrued compen-
satory time upon termination.
Council is requested to approve the above changes.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
"
,_) TO
SECOND BY
DEFINITIONS
o
For the purpose of the City of Andover Administrative policies,
the following definitions of terms used in the following policies
shall be used, unless otherwise noted:
ANNIVERSARY DATE: If an employee's starting date is on or before
the fifteenth (15th) of the month, the anniversary date will be
the first of that month; if the starting date is the sixteenth
(16th) day of the month or later, the anniversary date will be the
first of the following month.
DISMISSAL: Termination of any employee's employment for cause.
EMPLOYEE (PERMANENT): An employee who has completed his
probationary period and who has been appointed to serve on a
permanent full-time or permanent part-time basis in a position so
provided in the budget. Note: This definition shall not apply to
recording secretaries for City Council and/or Commissions and
whose duty is to solely record and/or transcribe minutes of
meeting proceedings. Such secretaries shall be exempt from the
provisions of this policy.
EMPLOYEE (TEMPORARY): An employee who has not acquired the status
of a permanent employee and who is employed on a temporary basis
as either full-time or part-time.
Family: A spouse, child, father, mother, brother, sister, mother-
in-law, father-in-law, daughter-in-law, son-in-law, stepmother,
stepfather, stepchild, grandchildren, grandparents, aunts and
uncles. (Adopted August 7, 1990)
HOURS WORKED: Shall mean to be hours worked to include training
time, call time, cleaning time, or any other time when the
employee must be either on the premises of the employer or
involved with the performance of duties in connection with
employment, or as set out in policy No. 12 (Adopted 12/83).
PROBATIONARY PERIOD: A period of 180 days, or as modified by the
City Council, during which time an employee is required to
demonstrate fitness for the position hired by actual performance
of the position's duties. An employee can be terminated during
this period with or without cause. (Amended 12/83).
OVERTIME: Those hours worked as set out in Policy No. 12, for
which time and one-half of regular payor compensatory time-off
shall be given to an employee pursuant to the provisions of this
policy. (Adopted 12/83).
RELATIVE: A parent, grandparent, spouse, child, sister, brother,
mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law,
daughter-in-law, son-in-law, step-parents, step-children.
:_)
SUPERVISOR: An employee designated by the City Council to assume
responsibility for certain supervisory or administrative functions
over other employees of the City.
WORK HOURS: 8:00 A.M. through 4:30 P.M. unless otherwise stated.
Shift changes may be made by Supervisors or Council.
WORK WEEK: 12:01 A.M. Sunday through 12:00 P.M. Saturday.
~
~
POLICY NO.3 - SICK LEAVE (Cont.)
G. Emp~oyees shall be paid for unused sick leave at time
of termination of employment from the city, provided
however the employee leave the City under favorable
conditions and in good standing. The following
schedule shall be used in the determination of pay-
off:
20% - all employees with two (2) through five
(5) years service time
40% - all employees with six (6) through ten
(10) years service time
50% - all employees with over ten (10) years
service time
At no time will any employee be paid for more than
400 hours as a pay-off.
H. Employees not reporting to work because of illness or
other personal health reasons should notify their
supervisor within one-half hour following the
beginning of their work day.
,
I. Sick leave of all employees must be reported.
J. Disability Insurance shall be available to city
employees, with the premiums for such insurance being
paid by the employee through a deduction from
accumulated sick leave benefits.
K. Sick leave may be used for the following circum-
stances: Personal illness, other personal health
reasons, illness of a relative, or legal quarantine.
(Adopted August 7, 1990)
o
I'
,~
POLICY NO.4 - LEAVES OF ABSENCE (Effective January 1, 1980)
1. POLICY
The City of Andover shall provide leaves of absence for
permanent and permanent part-time employees subject to
provisions of this policy:
II. PROVISIONS
A. The authority to grant leaves of absence, both paid
and unpaid, is charged to the supervisor. In the
case of occurrences in excess of this policy, leaves
are granted only with the concurrence of the City
Council.
III. PAID LEAVES OF ABSENCE
A. Employees will be granted a leave of absence with pay
in the event of death in the employee's family.
(Amended August 7, 1990)
B. The time allowed with pay will be a reasonable amount
depending upon circumstances to a maximum of three
days. Additional days, if required, may be granted
at the employee's expense or deducted from the~
employee's accrued sick leave. .
C. Absence due to inclement weather may be charged to
vacation accrual; otherwise, it must be taken without
pay.
D. Leave with pay may not be approved to extend vacation
or a holiday.
POLICY NO. 9 - HOLIDAYS
~
I. POLICY
The city of Andover shall provide paid holidays for all
permanent and permanent part-time employees subject to
the provisions of this policy.
II. HOLIDAYS
New Years Day ( January 1)
Martin Luther King Day (3rd Monday in January)
president's Day (3rd Monday'in February)
Memorial Day
Independence Day
Labor Day
Veterans Day
Thanksgiving Day
Christmas Day
Floating Day (This day to be determined by Administrator
at beginning of each year)
Floating Day (To be taken at employee's discretion with
approval of supervisor) (Effective 6-19-90)
III. ELIGIBILITY
A. Permanent Employees
1. Employees must be employed on a permanent status
on both the last working day before the holiday
and the first working day after the paid holiday.
2. Employees on paid or unpaid sick leave either the
last working day before a holiday or the first
work day after the holiday, or both, will receive
holiday pay.
3. Permanent part-time employees will be paid
holiday pay under the same schedule as permanent
full-time employees, but on a pro-rata basis.
IV. PROCEDURE
A. City Offices will be closed on all holidays.
B. One day'S regular pay will be paid to employees for
each holiday for which they are eligible.
C. When a holiday falls on a saturday, the City will
observe it on the previous day (Friday).
D. when a holiday falls on a Sunday, the City will
observe it on the following day (Monday).
~
E. When a holiday falls within an employee's vacation
period, the employee is entitled to an extra days
vacation. The additional day will be given at a time
mutually agreed upon by the City and employee.
F. Employees shall not be paid for holidays occurring
after the effective date of their resignation.
POLICY NO. 12 - OVERTIME (Effective January 9, 1986)
~
I. POLICY
It shall be the policy of the City of Andover to pay
employees overtime or give them compensatory time off in
accordance with the provisions of this policy.
Compensatory time off accrual shall not exceed forty (40)
hours at anyone time.
II. PROVISIONS
Hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours per day or
forty (40) hours within a seven (7) day work week will be
compensated at one and one-half times the base rate of
payor compensatory time off to all non-exempt employees.
Changes of shifts do not qualify an employee for overtime
pay. (Amended August 7, 1990)
Holidays shall be included in hours worked. only those
holidays included in this Administrative Policy shall
qualify for this inclusion.
In the case of city emergencies, defined as snow
emergencies, water or sewer utility emergencies, or any
natural disasters declared by the City Council, sick
leave time off will be included in hours worked, provided
however such sick leave is taken prior to the day of the
emergency for which overtime is worked. Sick leave may
be included in hours worked if such sick leave is taken
as a result of a personal emergency i.e., critical
illness or death of a family member, or receipt of a
physician's statement of illness for the sick leave time
taken following the emergency.
Hours worked for the purpose of overtime shall not
include vacation time off unless prior approval of such
vacation has been granted by the employee's supervisor.
City employees shall be required to work overtime if
requested to by their supervisor during a city emergency.
No employee shall work more than sixteen (16) consecutive
hours without reasonable time off (8 hours).
The City Council may determine the services of an exempt
employee are needed to perform a specific duty not
normally considered to be part of the position
requirements and for which compensatory time off is not
reasonable. If this determination is made, the Council
shall indicate the duties and an hourly wage for same.
In the case of employees required to take minutes at City
meetings, a two (2) hour minimum at the employee's
overtime rate shall be paid.
o
Employees shall be paid for accrued compensatory time
upon termination. (Adopted August 7, 1990)
,- \
,j
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
August 7, 1990
ITEM Approve Primary
NQ ,. Election Judges
Administ~ation
v. volk ~~'
APP~~ED F. OR
AGE~I ,~'
" I
BY:\}'
I
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Staff, Committee, Comm
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY:
A resolution appointing election judges for the September 11th
primary Election needs to be approved by the City Council.
Due to a shortage of judges in Precinct 2 at the time of this
writing, the resolution will be presented to Council at the
August 7th meeting.
MOTION BY
~.) TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
- "\
'--)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
August 7, 1990
"
"\
ITEM
NO.
Approve Cert./Cleanup
1. Costs/13650 Hanson
BY:
Administration
V. Volk \\ .
APPR~VE~'OR
AGE~ D4
V'
'--1
Byl ,.../
II
v
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee, Comm
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Attached is a memo from the former City Planner regarding the
cleanup of the property at 13650 Hanson Boulevard. Also attached
is a copy of the bill from Sauter and Sons for the cleanup.
Council is requested to approve the attached resolution
certifying this cost to the 1991 property taxes for PIN 34 32 24
41 0004. Included in the cost is an 8% interest fee plus a 15%
administrative fee. These interest and administrative fees are
what we charge for delinquent utilities that are certified to the
taxes.
MOTION BY
~.) TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
'~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
Victoria Volk, city Clerk
Tom Sauter; Jeff Gardas
Jay Blake, Planner, City Planne
June 20, 1990
13650 NW Hanson Boulevard Site Clean Up
Pursuant to Ordinance #72, Section 2, the City of Andover has
declared the above referenced property a public nuisance and has
notified the property owner of the ordinance violations on.the site.
An appropriate amount of time has been allowed for clean up'and the
site remains out of compliance with city requirements.
Copies of related correspondence is kept on file in the Planning
Department.
As allowed by Ordinance *72, Section 6, the City may contract as
deemed necessary to abate the public nuisance. The city has agreed
to contract with Sauter and Sons Incorporated to clean the site.
The appropriate bills will be submitted to the City Clerk for review
by the City Council and eventual certification to the county auditor
on or before September 1, 1990.
Legal Description: Lot 4, Block 1, pankonin Addition, Anoka County,
Minnesota.
Property ID Number: 34-32-24-41-0004
Fee Owner: Miller, Driscoll Enterprises
3430 West Cott Hills Drive
Eagan, MN 55123
')
"_/
0)
~ J
x~. ,;(~
'\~~~\
~ \\
." '., ~ .;:.. . . 't'. ,"."' ' ." :. ~
. : ' ;',. ','; ~: ~. "
,-,\
'-.J
. ~~o"jly'
V t1b'
, IS
~
STATEMENT
PHONE (612) 421.7919
FAX NO. (612) 421.2086
1nvoice:0025
Sauter &, Sons Inc.
EXCAVATING & GRADING
14050 AZURITE . ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303
July 24
19~
City of Andover (Victoria Volk, City Clerk)
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N;W.
Andover, MN 55304
DESCRIPTION PRICE AMOUNT
Le9"!'l1 DescriDtion: ,
Lot 4 Block 1 Pankonin
.
^..-l..-l~ t"; rm I1n"1<-,, ."
Property 1D number: 34-32-24-41-0004
Fee o..mer: Miller, Driscoll Enterprises
3430 West Cott Hill Drive
Eagan, MN 55123
13650 NW Hanson Blvd. site clean-up Balance- $4,200.00
RECEIVED BY TOTAL $4,200.00
Q
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO. R
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR FOR COLLECTION
CLEANUP COSTS FOR PIN 34 32 24 41 0004.
WHEREAS, the property known as PIN 34 32 24 41 0004 was
declared a public niusance under Ordinance *72; and
WHEREAS, the property owner was notified of the ordinance
violations and an appropriate amount of time was allowed for
'cleanup; and
WHEREAS, the property owner did not clean up the site and
the city contracted with Sauter and Sons to clean the site.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover that the cleanup charges plus interest and
administrative fees are hereby certified to the County Auditor to
be placed on the tax rolls and collected with the 1991 taxes.
Adopted by the city Council of the City of Andover this
day of
19
CITY OF ANDOVER
Attest:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria volk - City Clerk
~~
PIN
34 32 24 41 0004
~J
EXHIBIT A
Cleanup
Cost
$4,200.00
Interest/
Admin. Cost
$ 966.00
Total to
Be Certified
$5,166.00
r\
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Auoust: 7. lqqO
ITEM
NO.
Adopt 1988 Building
Code
/().
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admini,t'ation ~
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Staff, Committee, Comm
The City Council is requested to adopt the 1988 Minnesota State
Building Code pursuant to State statutes.
Attached is an ordinance amendment which amends the Building
Code.
The 1988 Code is the most current and we are required to
adopt it by law.
We will continue to use a modified 1985 fee schedule.
MOTION BY
:-) TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
:J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 19L
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 19, AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE
MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE.
The City Council of the City of Andover does ordain:
Ordinance 19 is amended as follows:
Section 1. Building Code
The Minnesota State Building Code, as amended, established
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 16B.60 through 16B.73, one copy
of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk is hereby
adopted as the building code for the City of Andover. Such code
is hereby incorporated in this ordinance as completely as if set
out in full.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 7th day
of August 1990.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Attest:
James E. Elling - Mayor
victoria Volk - City Clerk
~J
:-)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 7, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Staff, Committee,
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
,,"S JX
ITEM
NQ 11. 169th Lane
Traffic Stud
BY:
The City Council is requested to consider two alternates for speed
zoning for 169th Lane NW between Tulip Street NW and Round Lake
Boulevard prior to the State Traffic Engineer authorizing a formal
speed limit.
Alternate 1: Authorize a 35 mph speed limit for 169th Lane
between Quay Street and Round Lake Boulevard with no speed limit
authorization between Tulip Street and Quay Street. Apparently,
the State recommends no speed limit west of Quay Street due to the
all-way stop signs that exist at the intersection of Quay street
and 169th Lane and the needed advisory speed signing.
Alternate 2: Authorize a 35 mph speed limit for 169th Lane
between Tulip Street and Round Lake Boulevard and remove. the
existing all-way stop signs at Quay Street. Intersection does not
meet MUTCD warrants for an all-way stop. One (1) stop sign would
remain for Quay Street only. stop signs would be installed at
Poppy Street. Also, reverse turn signs with 20 mph advisory speed
plate will be required for two curves between Tulip Street and
Quay Street.
NOTE: MNDOT is recommending prohibiting parking on both sides of
169th Lane because of the narrow road.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
~,J TO
SECOND BY
.
I (,~t" 1...... NvJ "151< -;(' .-'
()(~\l"\tlEISO'4 -1< Minnesota Department of Transportation r..l..~~~ wJ. t4_J ~ (JlvJ
!J ~ Metropolitan District rro.
~ . g Transportation Building
~ ~ St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
~ 1-;.. OF Tl\t>-~~ Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley A venue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128
Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
Reply to :5001 fuluth Street, Golden Valley, Ifl 5542::
Telephone No. 591-L,6Q5 '
July 11, 1990
Todd J, Haas, Ass't. City Engineer
City of Andover
1685-Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
Re: Speed Zoning - 169th Lane
City of Andover
Dear Mr. Haas:
"
The speed zoning study for 169th Lane which was requested in your letter of June 28 has
been completed.
Based on the study results and as discussed with you previously, we have recommended
authorization of a 35 mph speed limit for 169th Lane between Quay Street and Round
Lake Boulevard. No speed limit authorization was recommended for the segment
between Tulip Street and Quay Street because it would not be possible to install
regulatory speed limit signs for this area without conflicting with either stop signs or
needed advisory speed signing. Our recommendation will be reviewed by the state traffic
engineer who will then issue a formal speed limit authorization to Andover for 169th Lane.
Before posting any speed limit, we suggest a review be made of 169th Lane to ensure
all other needed signing is inpJace, in good condition and meets the criteria of the Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Based on our observation during the study.
we suggest your review include consideration of the following signing changes:
- Installation of REVERSE TURN SIGNS (W1-3R) with "20 MPH" ADVISORY SPEED
PLATES (yV13-1) for the two curves between Tulip Street & Quay Street.
- Changing the all-way stop at Quay Street to a stop sign for Quay Street only. (This
intersection does not meet MUTCD warrants for an all-way stop.)
:J
An Equal Opportunity Employer
, "\
, I
~
'.J
Todd J. Haas
July 11, 1990
Page Two
- Installation of a STOP sign at Poppy Street.
- Prohibit parking on both sides of 169th Lane because of the narrow road width.
A copy of the radar speed sample obtained for the 169th Lane speed zoning study is
enclosed for your information. If there are questions concerning either the data or our
recommendations, please contact Ed Brown (591-4617) at this office,
Sincerely,
p..~,&~'
T' District Traffic Engineer
Enclosure:
JSK:pl:EB
.:)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 7, 1990
ITEM 12. Accept Resignation/
NQ utility Billing Clerk
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
Howard Koolick ~
Finance Director
BY:
'REQUEST
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
The Andover City Council is requested accept the resignation of
Debbie Stalboerger, the City's utility Billing Clerk.
The Andover City Council is further requested to appoint Charlene
Welu to the position at a starting rate of $8.50 per hour with a
probationary increase effective January 1, 1991 to $8.75 per hour.
BACKGROUND
Attached are Debbie's letter of resignation and a memo which was
sent to City employees notifying them of Debbie's departure.
Charlene is the City's current part-time account clerk. It is
anticipated that once the computerized accounting system is fully
operational, (six to nine months from now) that her current
position would no longer be needed. We are therefore recommending
appointing her to the utility Billing Clerk position effective
immediately.
In offering this position to her, she inquired about filling the
position on a four day a week basis. (80% time). Shirley Clinton,
City Treasurer and I discussed this idea and believe that Charlene
can complete the duties in this time. We have agreed to try the
position at four days to see if Charlene can do it.
COUNCIL ACTION
')
, ./
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'0
" _ ,.6-.,
. . '. .". '. ....
. .:. . .;;. .~..
,-J.
t-J-IQ..qo
t\ LrctN'L
KW\'I~
,- .
,
tr
~lftlOl
/
I
'-.
:)
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
All Ci ty Staff
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Howard Koolick, Finance Director
July 27, 1990
Resignation of Debbie Stalboerqer
For those of you who may not already know, Debbie Stalboerger has
decided to resign her position as utility Billing Clerk for the
City. Debbie is pregnant and has decided to leave work to spend
more time with her children. While at home she will be proyiding
daycare services for a neighbor's two children.
Speaking for the Finance Staff, we appreciate Debbie's hard work
over the last 2 years. We will certainly miss her sense of humor
as well as her understanding of the utility billing operation.
Debbie's official last day will be Friday August 3. Details of an
. appropriate send-off will follow.
Congratulations Debbie, and thank you for your contributions to
the City of Andover.
,-)
:)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ITEM
NO.
Accept Resignation/
/", Recept. -Sec., Cont.
:>.
Administ(\tiOn
V. Volk ~~.
DATE
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
NO. Staff, Committee, Comm
BY:
The City Council is requested to accept the resignation of Helena
Hoger effective August 24, 1990. Helena is leaving the city to
move out of the state.
Council is also requested to authorize staff to advertise for a
replacement.
Attached is a copy of Helena's letter of resignation.
Administrator's Comments
We have placed an ad in the local paper beginning August 1, 1990
to save time.
MOTION BY
-J TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
~)
,
]
I
I '
I
-)
L.
'-.-J
i I
, I
,.
,!
;
~ !
heSI \qqo
I:
I i C\ -i. v dl
i: "1- ~ /)0 ~ ~ ;In~ ~ 06
r(4~Z:<I'lqqO' 't ~ Q ~~ "'j
I:!~ ~~/~ ~^' t~ .
I ; [i 06. A ,..L
l: \.Y-GCJ 06 --/lnWLLQ../\.
: I
,i~ 0-nT1 ~0~r:J- ~o_tI~ -~~06
!: --A LU.tXLIYr 0- . .
! ;
, I
j.:
i!~(L~~~t ~~.t;
li~. ~h: ~.ny,(~u~
::C:OfJ ~f'.s /f:hoJ-.~ ~[p ~ vrrv. ,'Y)j
I
I:r~ cenci: 0-EPhlWt f~o(./(J.unanj .
!: LVJn~4.1 ~, ~ C-2tJ hCLD (~n
!,:~, ~Q..CL. ~~ ~~ CLnJ
i I \ _~J . r"
I;~ CJ.fiJ-} ~.--tu ~~ .khcct,:l, WCL<)
i'/ ~ aD +hoJ p~~.
;..
I::
itth(>J> t ~ ~ ~ r ",I-...
l!ux)J\~ ~~ ...-A:hact '-Ifku
I:!~~, /
,! lJ-- - ..
! I
I"
I~
I 0 '.
II ~j L~~,
I [clJ.~",-- I
, ,
il
:J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Auaust 7. lqqO
ITEM
NO.
Speedy Market SUP Disc
/4.
Administration
V. Volk ~\ ·
APPROVEAOR
AGENDA f\}\
BY, q
V
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee, Comm
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY:
Councilmember Jacobson asked that this item be on the agenda.
At the July 17th Council meeting, a representative of the Speedy
Market asked Council if they could obtain a permit to sell hot
dogs and cokes outside during the City Celebration. They were
told that it was too late to apply for a Special Use Permit,
which is what they would need.
The day after the meeting Mr. Schroeder from the Speedy Market
called and asked if they could obtain a Transient Merchant's
License. I talked to Bill Hawkins and after reading through the
Transient Merchant Ordinance, we decided that if someone other
than the Speedy Market applied for a Transient Merchant's
License, we could issue it.
Theodore Dick from Coca-Cola applied for a Transient Merchant's
License the following day and it was approved.
Attached is a copy of that portion of the ordinance that allows
for Coca-Cola to obtain this license.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
._) TO
SECOND BY
(~
'--'
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 79
AN ORDINANCE DEFINING TRANSIENT MERCHANT, PEDDLER, CANVASSER, AND
SOLICITOR AND REQUIRING SAID INDIVIDUALS OR ORGANIZATIONS TO COMPLY
WITH CERTAIN PROCEDURES WHILE DOING BUSINESS WITHIN THE CITY IN
ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR THE PUBLIC WELFARE, AND PROVIDING FOR FEES
AND PROHIBITING THE USE OF PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY OR PUBLIC PROPERTY
FOR CERTAIN ACTIVITIES.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains as follows:
Section I. Definitions
1) A "transient merchant" is any person whose business in the City
is temporary or seasonal and consists of selling and delivering
merchandise within the City, and who in furtherance of such purpose
uses or occupies any structure, vehicle, or other place for the
exhibition and sale of such merchandise, either privately or at
public auction; provided, however, that a transient merchant shall
not be construed to mean any person who while occupying such temporary
location, exhibits only samples for the purpose of securing ~rders
for future delivery only. The person so engaged shall not be relieved
from complying with the provisions of this Chapter merely by reason
of temporarily associating with or conducting such transient business
in connection with a local businessman.
2) A "Peddler" is any person traveling from place to place and/or
house to house who carries his merchandise with him, offering and
exposing the same for sale, and making deliveries to purchasers,
or any person who, without traveling from place to place, shall sell
or offer merchandise for sale from a vehicle or conveyance;
3) A "canvasser" or "solicitor" is any person traveling from place
to place and/or house to house who takes orders for the future
delivery of merchandise or for services to be performed in the future,
whether or not such person exposes a sample or collects advance
payments on such sales; provided, however, that such definition
shall also include any person who occupies any temporary structure,
vehicle or other place for the primary purpose of exhibiting samples
and taking orders for future delivery.
Section 2. License Required
A license shall be required for any transient merchant, peddler,
canvasser, or solicitor to operate in the City. The license period
will be six (6) months.
Section 3. Exclusions
~
No person shall be required to obtain a license in the following
instances:
A) Occupations licensed and/or bonded pursuant to state law.
:J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 7, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
15. Approve Specs/Rubb SRy:
Cleanu
Engineering
The City Council is requested to approve the attached specs for
clean up of the Pumkin City site.
The City has completed the legal process with the property owner
as of July 31st. The next step is for the City to contract for
the clean up and charge the cost back to the property owner.
The ad for bid has been placed in the official newspaper.
The bids will be received on August 21st and, if in order, awarded
at the 21st meeting.
If the Council has no further need for the bid documents, please
return them so we can use for bidders if needed.
Enclosed: Contract documents
MOTION BY
~) TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
:J
PROJECT 90-18
DEBRIS/RUBBISH CLEAN UP-
FOR
PUMKIN CITY
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
'.
Bid Documents and Specifications
.:)
~.~
DEBRIS/RUBBISH CLEAN UP
BIDS CLOSE AUGUST 21, 1990
Andover, Minnesota
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS - Sealed bids will be received by the
City of Andover, Minnesota in the City Hall at 1685 Crosstown
Boulevard N.W. until 10:00 A.M., C.D.S.T. on August 21, 1990, at
which time they will be publicly opened and read aloud for the
, furnishing of all labor and materials and all else necessary for
the following:
Debris/rubbish clean up for pumkin City, Project No. 90-18.
Clean up involves removal of large items.
Specifications, proposal forms and contract documents may be
seen at the office of the City Engineer, Andover, Minnesota.
Each bid shall be accompanied by a bidder's bond naming the
City of Andover as obligee, certified check payable to the City
of Andover or a cash deposit equal to at least five percent (5%)
of the amount of the bid, which shall be forfeited to the City in
the event that the bidder fails to enter into a contract.
The City Council reserves the right to retain the de~o~i~s of
the three lowest bidders for a period not to exceed 30 days after
the date and time set for the opening of bids. No bids may be
withdrawn for a period of thirty (30) days after the date and
time set for the opening of bids.
Payment for the work will be by cash or check.
Contractors desiring a copy of the specifications and
proposal forms may obtain them from the Andover City offices.
The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all
bids, to waive irregularities and informalities therein and
further reserves the right to award the contract to the best
interests of the City.
James Schrantz
City Administrator
City of Andover
Minnesota
~
::_)
BID PROPOSAL
FOR
DEBRIS/RUBBISH CLEAN UP
FOR
PUMKIN CITY
PROJECT 90-18
By
, 1990
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Andover, Minnesota
Honorable Mayor and Council Members:
We have examined the site of the work and are familiar with the
clean up and disposal plans and specifications, and propose_to
furnish all labor, materials, skills and facilities which ~r~
necessary for clean up and disposal in accordance with the Plans,
Specifications, and Addenda Nos. , and thereto,
prepared by the City Engineer for the respective lump sum price
set forth hereinafter.
Bid Item
Item 1
and removal of all
lump sum prfce of
) .
debris/rubbish from Pumkin
1 L.S. - Clean up
City site for the
Dollars ($
The quantity is lump sum. Payment will be made for the work
ordered and actually completed.
'We agree that the City of Andover, Minnesota, intends to award
all of the work shown in the proposal to one responsible bidder
in the best interest of the City.
The City reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive
any informalities in any bid, and to omit any part of the above
work.
Acc'ompanying this proposal is the required bid security, the same
being subject to forfeiture according to the Minnesota Statutes
in the event of default by the undersigned.
'--, We have examined the si te or the work and are acquainted wi th all
,..-J condi tions affecting the construction of the work.
Where there appears a discrepancy between the written words and
numerals in the lump sum bid, the written words in the lump sum
bid shall govern.
, )
,-
'"J
All addenda shall become a part of the bid and shall be submitted
with the bid. The Cont.actor shall insert addenda numbers in the
space where indicated in the Proposal Form. The Contractor shall
also complete the attached subcontractors and equipment lists.
We agree tha~ if this proposal is accepted, we will execute a
contract in the form attached to the specifications and will
furnish a bond in the full amount of the contract and in the form
attached to the specifications.
If we are awarded the contract, we will furnish the necessary
labor and skills to perform work as described, on or before
October 1, 1990.
Respectfully submitted,
Firm Name
Signed by
Address of
Bidder
:J
~
SPECIFICATIONS
1. The Contractor shall re~ove all debris/rubbish on the Pumkin
City site, and dispose of said debris/rubbish in a legal and
proper manner taking the necessary precautions.
2.
The Contractor shall obtain all necessary permits for
disposal.
The Ci ty will provide the necessary access to the project
si te. .
The Contractor has 30 days to complete the work.
3.
4.
5. The Contractor must start within 10 days of notice to
proceed.
C)
FORM OF AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and signed this
day of
, 1990, by and between
, hereinafter called the "Owner", and
, hereinafter called
the "Contractor".
THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH, that the Owner and the Contractor,
for the consideration hereinafter stated, agree as follows:
The Contractor hereby covenants
the provisions of the plans and
under Article IV, for:
and agrees to perform
specifications
ARTICLE I.
and execute all
indicated below
Removal of all debris/rubbish on the
pumkin City site
,~'.
and to do everything required by this Agreement and the Contract
Documents.
ARTICLE II. The Contractor agrees that the work contemplated by
this Contract shall be fully and satisfactorily completed on or before
October 1, 1990.
ARTICLE III. The Owner agrees to pay and the Contractor agrees to
receive and accept payment in accordance with the prices bid for the
unit or lump sum items as set forth in the conformed copy of Proposal
Form hereto attached, which prices shall conform to those in the
acce~ted Contractor's Proposal on file in the office of the
City Engineer, the aggregate of which prices, based on the lump sum to
be $
ARTICLE IV. The Contract Documents shall consist of the following
component parts:
~
This
form. the
Contract
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
The Proposal Form (conformed copy)
Conditions of the Contract (General, Supplementary and other
Condi tions)
Special Provisions (if any)
Plans and Drawings which are attached to the Specifications or
which are identified as Sheets 1 through for:
Specifications (General and Specific RequIrements)
Addenda No. through No.
Performance ana-payment Bond
This Agreement
Agreement, together with the documents hereinabove mentioned,
Contract and all documents are as fully a part of the
as if attached hereto or herein repeated.
.:J
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have hereunto
set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written.
Attest:
In the presence of:
J
The
By
By
By
(Seal)
Mayor
Contractor
Ti tle
'"
'.
o
-~)
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1 .
DEFINITIONS:
For the purposes of this contract and specifications, the
following words are used in accordance with these definitions.
If p~onouns are used in place of them, the same interpretation
shall apply.
1. Owner is the City of Andover, Minnesota, acting personally
or through its duly authorized representative.
2. Engineer refers to the City Engineer of the City of Andover,
Minnesota, acting personally or through his duly authorized
representative.
3. Contractor is the individual, firm or corporation with.whom
,
'.~
the owner contracts and awards the work.
4. Subcontractor is the individual, firm or corporation having
a direct contract with the contractor, and includes one who
furnishes work and/or material to be incorporated in the work
according to the plans and specifications.
5. Contract documents consist of the agreement, the general
conditions of the contract, and the drawings and
specifications, including all modifications thereto
incorporated in the documents before their execution. These
form the contract.
6~ Work includes labor and/or materials, equipment,
transportation, or other facilities necessary to complete the
contract.
7 .
Specifications refer to the directions, provisions and
requirements contained herein pertaining to the method and
,- "
.,-)
.')
manner of performance of the work and the qualities and
8.
quantity of material to be furnished under the contract.
Bidder is any individual, firm or corporation offering, on a
form furnished by the owner, to perform the work completed in
the drawings and specifications.
9. Proposal is the written offer of the bidder on a form
furnished by the owner, properly signed and guaranteed, to
perform the contemplated work.
10. Plans are all approved drawings, or reproduction of such
drawings, pertaining to the work provided in the contract.
11. Proposal guaranty is the security designated in the proposal
and furnished by the bidder as a guaranty of good faith to
enter into a contract with the owner for performing the'work
should it be awarded to him.
12. Performance bond is the approved form of security furnished
by the contractor and his surety or sureties guarantying the
faithful performance of the contract and the payment of all
obligations arising thereunder.
13. Inspector is a.representative of the engineer, authorized to
make detailed inspections of any and all portions of the work
performed and materials incorporated in the work.
2. EXECUTION, CORRELATION AND INTENT OF DOCUMENTS:
The contract documents shall be signed in duplicate by the owner
and the contractor.
In case the owner and the contractor fail to
sign the general conditions, drawings or specifications, the
engineer shall identify them.
The contract documents are complementary and what is called for by
r~ anyone shall be binding as though called for by all, and the
'-/
contractor shall rigorously abide by all their provisions. The
intention of the documents is to include all labor, tools,
material, equipment, supplies and transportation necessary for
the proper execution of the work. Any disagreement between them
shall be determined by the engineer, and his decision shall be
final. Whenever the phrase "or equal" shall appear in the
contract documents, it shall be construed to mean "oi equal in
the opinion of the engineer".
If any disagreement appears between the drawings, specifications
or proposal form, the bidder shall request from the engineer in
writing a clarification. This will enable the engineertb-Qotify
other interested parties of the discrepancy and its clarification.
3. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS:
All drawings, specifications or copies of same furnished by the
engineer remain as his property, and, with the exception of the
signed contract set, shall be returned upon request at completion
of the ~ork. They must not be used for work other than this
contract.
The engineer will furnish, free of charge, all copies of drawings
and specifications reasonably necessary for the prosecution of the
work. One set of drawings shall be returned to the engineer upon
completion of the work as "as constructed" drawings, and shall be
accurately marked with any and all alterations and dimensions that
deviate from the printed drawings and details.
,)
The contractor shall at all times keep a copy of the drawings and
:J
specifications at the work site, and the engineer shall have
access to them at all times.
The engineer shall further furnish such additional drawings or
instructions as are necessary for the proper execution of the
work. All such drawings and instructions shall not be
inconsistent with the contract documents, shall be true
developments thereof, and reasonably inferable therefrom. In
using the drawings and specifications, the specifications shall
take precedence over the drawings. Figure dimensions shall be
followed in preference to scaled dimensions, and large scale
drawings shall take precedence over smaller scale drawings. In
any case, it shall be the contractor's responsibility to have
,
,
omissions or discrepancies in the drawings or specifications
clarified before ordering material or executing the work called
for in the contract.
The contractor shall verify all dimensions affecting the
installation.
4. CONTRACTOR'S UNDERSTANDING:
It is understood and agreed that the contractor has completely
familiarized himself with the drawings, specifications, the type,
nature and location of the work site, materials required both as
to qualit~ and quantity, equipment and facilities needed
preliminary to and during the execution of the work, all local
and general conditions affecting the work, and all other matters
which can in any way affect the work under this contract. No
consideration will be given for failure to make sufficient
.J
examination or. investigation.
(' )
'---'
.)
5. EXPLANATION TO BIDDERS AND ADDENDA
Neither the owners nor the engineers will give verbal answers to
inquiries regarding the meanings of drawings and specifications,
or verbal instructions previous to the award of the contract.
Any explanation desired by bidders must be requested from the
engineer in writing, and if explanation is necessary, a reply will
be made in the form of an addendum, a copy of which will be
forwarded to each bidder who has received a set of contract
documel}ts.
All addenda issued to bidders prior to date of receipt of
proposals shall become a part of the contract documents, and all
proposals are to include the work therein described. Each~~
proposal submitted shall list all addenda by number which have
been received prior to the time scheduled for receipt of
proposals.
6. PROPOSALS:
All proposals shall be submitted on forms furnished by the
engineer. All information, lump sums and unit prices requested
shall be completely filled out by typewriter or in ink. All
corporation bids shall bear the official seal of the corporation.
proposals may be rejected if they indicate any omissions,
alterations of form, additions unrequested, conditional bids,
irregularities or prices that are obviously unbalanced.
A proposal may be withdrawn without prejudice to the bidder by
written request prior to the hour of letting. Such withdrawn
proposals may be resubmitted at any time prior to the time set
c=) for opening of proposals. The owner reserves the right to reject
any and all proposals and to waive any informalities and
irregularities in the bidding.
7. PROPOSAL GUARANTY:
Each proposal shall be accompanied by a proposal guaranty in the
form of a certified check, bank draft, or cash, payable to the
owner in the amount of five (5) percent of the lump sum bid or an
amount designated on the proposal form. In lieu of the certified
check specified above, the bidder may submit a standard bid bond
form executed by the bidder from an acceptable surety company in
the same amount as specified for the certified check. The
proposal guaranty of all except the three lowest bidders will be
'.
~
returned within three days after the opening of proposals. The
proposal guaranty of the three lowest bidders will be returned
within 48 hours after the executed contract and required bonds
have been finally approved by the owner.
8. QUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS
The owner may request the bidder to submit information necessary
to satisfy the owner that the bidder is adequately prepared to
fulfill the contract. Such information may include past
performance records, lists of available personnel, plant,
equipment, financial statement or any other pertinent information.
9. INDEMNITY
The contractor shall hold harmless from and indemnify the owner
against all claims, suits, actions, costs, counsel fees, expenses,
,-)
damages, judgements or de~rees by reason of any person or persons
or property being damaged or injured by the contractor or by any
8
of his subcontractors, in any capacity during the progress of.the
work whether by negligence or otherwise.
10. PERFORMANCE BOND
Prior to the signing of the contract, the contractor shall be
required to furnish the owner with a performance bond from a
surety acceptable to the owner, in the form required by law, in
an amount equal to the full amount of the. contract based on the
lump sum bid or the anticipated quantities and unit prices as
determined by the engineer.
This bond shall' guarantee the proper execution and completion of
the work and shall further guarantee the prompt payment of all
persons or firms furnishing labor, tools, materials, equipment and
supplies for the work.
Premiums shall be paid by the contractor.
11. INSURANCE
The contractor shall obtain and maintain in full force for the
duration of the contract the insurance designated below.
~
Workmen's Compensation
The contractor shall take out and maintain during the life of the
contract Workmen's Compensation Insurance for all of his employees
employed at the work site. If any employees are engaged in
hazardous work not covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance,
the..contractor shall provide adequate protection from Employer's
Liability Insurance for protection of employees not otherwise
protected.
~- ) Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance
'---
~)
The contractor shall take out and maintain during the life of the
contract Public Liability Insurance .and Property Damage Insurance
to protect him from claims arising out of public liability and
property damage, for personal injury including death, claims for
property damages which may arise out of work, or by one directly
or indirectly employed by the contractor. Amounts of insurance
shall be as follows: Public Liability Insurance shall not be less
than five hundred thousand ($500,000) dollars for injuries,
accidental death, to one person, subject to the same limit for
each person, not less than five hundred thousand ($500,000)
dollars for one accident. Property damage shall be for two
hundred fifty thousand (250,000) dollars for each accident but
not less than five hundred thousand (500,000) dollars aggregate.
Fire Insurance
The contractor shall carry full insurance against loss by fire
and wind damage upon all material in place or stored at the site
for installation. This provision does not exclude material
partially paid for by the owner. This insurance shall be for
the full insurable value of the material and shall be kept in
full force until final acceptance and payment of the work by ~he
owner.
Automobile Insurance
The contractor shall take out and maintain during the life of this
contract Automobile Public Liability Insurance in the amounts of
not less than $500,000 property damage liability.
If any part of the work is under subcontract, similar insurance
shall be provided by or on behalf of the subcontractors to cover
all work done under their operations.
;)
All insurance shall be placed with companies acceptable to and
approved by the owner.
The contractor shall submit copies of insurance coverage with the
owner for filing.
If any section of the work entails special hazards, the contractor
shall provide riders to the Public Liability and Property Damage
Insurance to provide protection from these special hazards.
12. SUBCONTRACTORS
Prior to the performance of any work, the contractor shall furnish
the engineer in writing the names of subcontractors proposed for
the work. Such subcontractors shall be of proven qualifica~ions,
and any subcontractor unsatisfactory to the owner or engineer
shall not be employed on the work.
Subcontractors shall have no contractual relations with the owner,
and the contractors shall assume complete responsibility for the
acts and omissions of his subcontractors or any persons directly
or indirectly employed by them.
~)
13. CHANGES AND EXTRAS
The engineer or owner, without nullifying the contract, may order
changes, deletions and extra work done. If these changes or extra
work are of a nature such as would affect the contract price, an
adjustment will be made by:
(1) Agreement between owner, engineer and contractor of a lump
sum for the work.
(2) By contractual unit prices.
(3) By cost plus a percentage.
All work changes involving adjustment of the contract price shall
be in writing.
:~)
The engineer may give instructions for minor alterations without
extra cost providing these alterations are not inconsistent with
the purpose of the work.
14. ROYALTIES, PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS
The contract price shall, without exception, include compensation
for all royalties and costs arising from patents and/or trademarks
in any way included in the work. The contractor shall defend all
suits or claims of infringement and shall save the owner harmless
from less thereof.
15. PERMITS, REGULATIONS AND LICENSES
The contractor shall obtain, at his own expense, all permits and
licenses necessary for the prosecution of the work where such
items are directly applicable to the performance of the work.
Permits, licenses and easements for permanent structures and
permanent changes in existing facilities shall be secured by the
owner.
The contractor shall conform to all local, state and federal codes
and regulations applicable to the work, and the contractor shall
hold the owner harmless for neglect or failure to conform to these
requirements. If any work drawn or specified is contrary to such
codes, the contractor shall so notify the engineer for proper
revisions and alterations.
:)
16. ENGINEER'S STATUS
The engineer shall have general supervision and direction of the
work and the authority to stop work when necessary to insure the
proper execution of the contract. He shall have the authority to
reject all work and materials which do not conform to the contract
and to decide questions which arise in the execution of the work.
~J
The engineer shall present his decisions in writing on all claims
of the owner or the contractor and all other materials relating to
the execution and progress of the work or interpretation of the
contract documents.
I
17. ASSIGNMENT
Neither party to the contract shall assign the contract in whole
or in part without the written consent of the other, nor shall
the contractor assign any monies due or to become due to him
without the previous written consent of the engineer.
18. SUSPENSION AND RESUMPTION OF WORK
The engineer shall have the authority to suspend the contractor's
operations wholly or in part for such periods of time as he'may
deem necessary because of unsuitable weather or other conditions
which he considers unfavorable for the prosecution of the work, or
because of the noncompletion of work being done under other
contracts on the same construction; or for such time as may be
necessary because of the failure of the contractor to comply with
the provisions of the contiact. Such "Suspension of Work Order"
shall be in writing and will state the reason for such suspension,
the effective date, and the operations suspended. Any work done
by the contractor contrary to such "Suspension of Work Order"
shall be consider~d as unauthorized work and as having been done
at the expense of the contractor.
No operations which have been suspended by a "Suspension of Work
Order" shall be resumed until the engineer has issued a
:_~
"Resumption of work Order". The order to resume operations will
be issued when, in the opinion of the engineer, the conditions
which justified the suspension no longer exist. This order shall
be in writing and will state the reason for ordering such
resumption, the effective date and the operation to be resumed.
<~
'---....
)
~
If it should become necessary to suspend operations for any
indefinite period, the contractor shall, before leaving the
project, store all materials and equipment in such manner as will
not obstruct or impede the owner. He shall take every precaution
to prevent damage to or deterioration of the work performed, shall
provide suitable drainage of the area and shall erect temporary
structures where necessary.
19. INTERFERENCE WITH OTHER UTILITIES
A. The contractor shall determine the existence of gas mains,
utilities, and any other obstructions located on the work site
which may be interfered with under this contract, and no
responsibility is assumed by the owner or the engineer for the
'.
accuracy of the location of the utilities indicated on any of the
plans. The contractor is to exercise care in crossing watermains
and other utilities and is to be responsible for any damage
thereto. The contractor will assume all responsibility to the
utility companies for expense incurred by them to protect or
maintain their operation during the time the work is in progress.
B. The contractor will notify the owner, the gas company, the
telephone company and the power company and other utilities prior
to the beginning of any construction operations in the vicinity of
such utilities obstruction.
20. RIGHT OF THE OWNER TO DO THE WORK
If the contractor should neglect to prosecute the work properly or
fail to perform any provision of this contract, the owner, after
three days written notice to the contractor, may,without
prejudice to any other remedy the owner may have, make good such
deficiencies and may deduct the cost thereof from the payment then
:J
or thereafter due to the contractor, provided, however, that the
engineer shall approve both such action and the amount charged to
the contractor.
21. RIGHT OF THE OWNER TO TERMINATE CONTRACT
If the contractor should be adjudged a bankrupt, or if he should
make a general assignment for the benefit of his creditors, or if
a receiver should be appointed on account of his insolvency, or
if he should persistently or repeatedly refuse or should fail,
except in cases for which extension of time is provided, to supply
enough properly skilled workmen or proper materials, Dr if he
should fail to make prompt payment to subcontractors for labor or
materials, or should persistently disregard laws, ordinances, or
the instructions of the engineer, or otherwise be guilty of a
substantial violation of any provision of the contract, then the
owner, upon the certificate of the engineer that sufficient cause
exists to justify such action, may without prejudice to any other
right or remedy and after giving the contractor and the surety on
his bond seven days written notice, terminate the employment of
the contractor and take possession of the premises and of all
materials, tools, and appliances thereon and finish the work by
whatever method the owner may deem expedient. In such case, the
contractor shall not be entitled to receive any further payment
until the work is finished. If the unpaid balance of the contract
price shall exceed the expense of finishing the work, including
compensation for additional managerial and administrative
services, such excess shall be paid to the contractor. If such
expense shall exceed such unpaid balance, the contractor shall
pay the difference to the owner.
~)
(J
22. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY AND RESTORATION
All public and private property adjacent to the job shall be
properly protected from damage by means acceptable to the
engineer. Property shall mean buildings, structures,
installations, trees, landscaping, street surfacing, or other
improvements.
Any property that must be removed or destroyed because of the
nature of the work under this contract shall be restored in its
original substance and position as the engineer would direct
which would be at least equal to the conditions existing prior
to the contractor's performance.
~)
23. PAYMENTS TO CONTRACTORS
Partial payment for the work performed and materials available
for incorporation in the work shall be made on a monthly estimate
prepared by the engineer. Ten percent (10%) of all monies due
shall be withheld until final completion and acceptance of the
work. In addition to the percentage withheld, the owner shall
withhold such amount as may be necessary to remedy the following:
1. Defective work uncorrected.
2. Failure of contractor properly to pay for labor,
materials or work of subcontract completed.
3. A reasonable doubt that the contract can be completed
for the balance unpaid.
4. Evidence of damage unremedied.
After the completion of the project, the engineer shall prepare a
final estimate of all work performed by the contractor based on
the unit prices and lump sums of the proposal together with all
added and deducted items in accordance with the contract. Final
estimate will be submitted to the contractor for his approval,
and upon such approval and recommendation of the engineer, final
:J
payment will be paid to include any retained percentages. The
owner may require from the contractor evidence proving that all
claims against him by reason of the contract have been paid or
satisfactorily secured. If such evidence is not furnished, the
owner shall withhold a sufficient sum to cover all claims unpaid.
The making of progressive payments shall not be considered in any
way an acceptance of any of the work or installation by the
owner, and the making of such payments shall not relieve the
contractor of any of the requirements of the contract documents.
prior to final payment, the contractor shall submit proof that the
applicable state of Minnesota income tax withholding requirements
have. been complied with.
.,
24. CHARACTER OF WORK AND MATERIALS
All work done shall be first class only, the best possible at the
present state of the arts. Botched or slovenly work will not be
permitted. All workmen shall be experienced and qualified to
perform the work assigned. Unless otherwise specified, all
material used in the work shall be new, of the designated quality
or superior.
25. SUPERVISION AND CHARACTER OF WORKMEN
The contractor shall employ such careful and competent
superintendents, foremen and workmen as may be considered
necessary by the engineer for the proper prosecution of the work.
The engineer may demand in writing the dismissal of any employees
of the contractor found to be negligent'or careless in the
performance of his duties.
~J
The superintendent or foreman, as the case may be, shall
represent the contractor in his absence, and all directions
given to him shall be as binding as if given to the contractor.
There shall be a superintendent or foreman on the job at all
:J
times.
26. GUARANTEE
The contractor shall hold himself responsible for any and all
defects that may develop in any part of the entire work or
installation furnished by him, and upon receipt of written
notice from the engineer, shall immediately replace and make
good, without expense to the owner, any faulty part or parts
and damage done by reason of the same, during a period of
one (1) year from the date of final acceptance of the work or
installation (except when a specific guarantee for another
period is specified).
,
27. ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK
The engineer will make a final inspection of the entire project,
and if such inspection shows that the work required by the
contract has been completed in accordance with the terms thereof,
the engineer will so certify, and the owner will forthwith accept
the workmanship and quality of the materials in the entire
project. However, this in no way relieves the contractor of
his guarantee to the owner.
28. FAILURE TO COMPLETE WORK ON TIME
Should the contractor fail to complete the work on or before the
original date set forth for completion in the contract, or on or
before the co~rected date as granted by extensions of time for
completions, the owner may permit the contractor to proceed, and
in such case, there shall be deducted from any monies due or that
~:~ become due the contractor the sum of $200.00 per day for each and
every calendar day, exclusive of Sundays and holidays, that the
work shall remain uncompleted. This sum shall be considered ~nd
-')
'J
'.J
treated not as a penalty, but as the cost of field and office
engineering and inspection and liquidated damages.
Permitting the contractor to continue and finish the work or any
part of it after the time fixed for its completion, or after the
date to which the time of completion may have been extended, shall
in no way operate as a waiver on the part of the owner or any of
its rights under the contract. Neither by the taking over of the
work by the owner nor by the termination of the contract shall
the owner forfeit the right to recover liquidated damages from
the contractor or his surety for failure to complete the
contract.
29. PROTECTION AND/OR RESTORATION OF SURVEY MONUMENTS
It is the responsibility of the contractor to protect and leave
undisturbed those markers or monuments set for the subdivision of
land, unless these markers must be disturbed in order to execute
the contract. In this event, the contractor will notify the
engineer prior to such dislocation in order for the engineer to
tie in the marker to make possible the relocation after
construction is completed. If the contractor shall be negligent
in this matter, it shall be his responsibility to restore all
monuments to their respective positions at his own expense.
/-'\
'_J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 7, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
1\T....n_n;"~ __'~_ T"
ITEM 16. Approve Plans &
NO. Specs/Blackfoot
90 14
Engineering
~*
",....nn.'T Q,,,.,,
APPROV~k FOR
AGENl~
BY: II
V
st /
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving
final plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bids
for Project No. 90-14, Cedar Hills River Estates, Cedar Crest 3rd
Addition area for street construction.
Plans and specifications are available in the Engineering Office.
MOTION BY
:J TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
~J
~)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 90-14, CEDAR CREST 3RD
ADDITION/CEDAR HILLS RIVER ESTATES FOR STREET CONSTRUCTION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 088-90, adopted by the City
Council on the 17th day of July , 1990, BRA '
has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 90-14
for street construction; and
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to
the City Council for their review on the 7th day of
August , 1990.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to
hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as
required by law, with such bids to be opened at 10:00 a.m.
Friday, August 24 ,1990 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted
day of
by the City Council at a
Meeting this
,19 ,with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution and
voting against same
Councilmen
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
~)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 7, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
17. Receive Petition/
Order Feas. study/
Hidden Cr. E. 3rd
Engineering
~
The City Council is requested to approve the following resolution
for Project 90-5, Hidden Creek East 3rd Addition:
1. Resolution declaring adequacy of petition and ordering
preparation of feasibility report.
2. Resolution accepting feasibility study, waiving public hearing,
ordering improvements and directing preparation of plans and
specifications (attached is the feasibility report).
3. Resolution approving final plans and specifications and
ordering advertisement for bids.
Plans and specifications are in the Engineering Office ~or review.
MOTION BY
:,) TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
~J
~)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS OF SANITARY SEWER,
WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
PROJECT NO. 90-5 ,IN THE HIDDEN CREEK EAST 3RD ADDITION AREA.
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition, dated
July 27, 1990 ,requesting the construction of improvements; and
WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to represent the
signatures of 100% of the affected property owners requesting such
improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover that:
1. The petition is hereby declared to be 100% of owners of
property affected, thereby making the petition unanimous.
2. Escrow amount for feasibility report is -0-
3. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to TKDA
and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a
feasibility report.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
day of
Council at a
Meeting this
19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City, Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
'~J
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING,
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT 90-5 FOR
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND STREETS WITH CONCRETE
CURB AND GUTTER IN THE FOLLOWING AREA HIDDEN CREEK EAST 3RD
ADDITION .
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 7th day of August
19 90 , order the preparation of a feasibility study for the
improvements; and
WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by
presented to the Council on the 7th day of August
TKDA and
, 19~; and
WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a Public
Hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and
declares the improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of
$ 180,180.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby receive the feasibility report with an estimated
total cost of improvements of $ 180,180.00 , waive the Public
Hearing and order improvements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the
firm of TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such
improvement project.
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby
require the developer to escrow the sum of $ 15,000.00 with such
payments to be made prior to commencement of work on the plans and
specifications.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a
19 , with Councilmen
Meeting this
and adopted by the
day of
voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
.-, ATTEST:
',,)
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
~J
:.)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 90-5, HIDDEN CREEK EAST
3RD ADDITION FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, STREETS
WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. , adopted by the City
Council on the 7th day of August , 1990, TKDA
has prepared final plans and specifications for Project 90-5
for Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, Streets with Concrete
Curb and Gutter construction; and
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to
the City Council for their review on the 7th day of August
1990.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to
hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as
required by law, with such bids to be opened at 10:00 A.M.
Tuesday, September 4 , 1990 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted
by the City Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution and
voting against same
Councilmen
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria volk - City Clerk
:J
GOOD
~VALUE
HOMES
rn-c -lEl1rt:n' -
nG~~-;~;i .
-----~-
CITY OF ^NDOVER
July 27, 1990
Mr. James Schrantz,
City Admihistrator
City of Andover
Andover, Mn. 55303
Re: Hidden Creek East Third Addition
q(J- ~
Dear Mr. Schrantz,
Good Vaiue Homes Inc. does hereby petition for
improvements by the construction of water mains, sanitary
sewer, storm sewer, and streets with concrete curb and
gutter. I am requesting that the cost of said
improvements be assessed against the benefiting
properties. The property which should be assessed is
Lots 8-20 Block 2, Lots 23-26 Block 2 and Lots 5-8 Block 6
according to the preliminary plat for Hidden Creek East.'
The above petition is unanimous and our right to have a
pUblic hearing is hereby waived. Please prepare the
feasibility report as soon as possibie.
s\m~
JO~~ Peterson
Vic~\president
<_J
GOOD V^LUE HOMES, INC. . Registered 13uilder . 1460 93rd Lane N,E.. IJIaine. MN 55434-4396 . Phone: (612) 780-5510
r-~ D~ ^
;.,./K '~
ENGINEERS Al'ICHITECn PLANN6R9
fOLTZ. KINO. DUVALL, "ND'ROON
AND Ae800IAT18. INOORPORAnO
R5!lO AMllRIOAll NAT10NAL IlANK IUIlOINI.I
SAINT PNJl. \.lINNUOTA 50'0'
51l!me.4lO0
F~ 812m2""'0'
August 2, 1990
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, MiJUlesota
Rt: PeRSibUity Report Update
Hidden Creek Bast - 3rd Addition Fhase I
Project 90-5
Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 9716
Dear Mayor and CouncU:
The above referenced project is the third phase of Hidden Creek East, as noted in the feasibility
report for Project 87-1, dated January 29, 1987. That report details all hnprovements and covers
project costs and details. 'This letter amends that report for the 3rd Addition - Phase I.
Cost Estimate
The third addition proposes 38 rcsidentiallots. The cost estimate, based on the feasiblllty report,
is lIS follows:
Estimated Construction Cost per Unit:
$6,065 (1987) x 1.07 (ENR lndex)
Project Expenses (30%)
Estimated Totl!1 Project Cost
$ 6,600.00
138,600.00
41.580.0.0
$180,180.00
Estimated Total Construction Cost (21 Lots)
E"tlmated Assessments
Estimated Project Assessment Rate, $180,180/21 Lots =
$ 8,580.00
T "d
.:J
~)
Honorable Mayor and City Council
~dover,Mlnnesota
February 19, 1990
Page Two
Trunk charges are blUled on the 1990 rates for sower and water.
Sanitary Trunk Charge, $91Z.oo/Acre x 7.Z Acres
Water Trunk Charge., $972/Acre x 7.2 Acres
Sanitary Sewer Connection Charge, $Z32.9 x 21 Lots
Watermain Connection Charge., $1,055 x 21 Lots
Storm Sewer Area Charge", $600 x 2i Lots
Total Estimated Improvement Cost
Total Estimated Improvement Assessment Rate:
$204.237 m $9,726.00
21 Lots
6,566.00
None '"
4,891.00
None '"
12.600.00
$204,237.00
'"
SW 1/4 of SW 1/4, Section 34, Township 32, Range 24 previously assessed water area and
connection charges.
.... The anticipated area storm sewer assessment for 1990 is $1,742.40 per acre or
approximately $600.00 per lot.
Sincerely yours,
JLD/mha
:J
2"d
":>OSStl '3 "wa'>I" 1 8S: or 06, zo ~'ntl
RUG 02 '90 10: 58 T .1<. D. A. R RSSOC.
P.3
/ '\ ~RDI! sr. t U\\~ \ \ \\\U
,.-.J
ytffr ~
" II .. ~ ~ .. . ...
UPLANDER
:zs: " .. ~ ~ '"
01
-
[;j
....
a.
~ N
f'1
z
=:
:c
0
" " 0
m
z
.. '" 0
UI ::D
m
m
^
m
}>
~
N ijj
N
./> \I(
tl ;j.
r !1
g Ie S;
~ M 11:
!l ~
,. tl
II
~J
~
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
August 7, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
18. Amend Joint Powers
Agreement/CSAH 9 &
135th
Engineering
~
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the Joint Powers
Agreement for the installation of temporary traffic control
signals at the intersection of Round Lake Boulevard (CSAH 9) and
Roosevelt street (135th Avenue).
City share at this time is 0% but the cities of Anoka and Andover
will share in the construction costs of the permanent signal when
it is constructed. This will occur when Round Lake Boulevard is
upgraded from 133rd Avenue to County Road 116 (Bunker Lake
Boulevard) .
In addition, the cities of Anoka and Andover will need to have an
agreement to get power to the intersection and for the ongoing
cost of electric power. The Joint Powers will be presen~ed to you
at the next regular meeting.
The City will be responsible to install electrical power
source to the service pad or pole and to pay the ongoing
cost of electrical power to the temporary and permanent
signal.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
:) TO
SECOND BY
~J
F,\
'-..J
, .
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
FOR THE
INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS
AT THE INTERSECfION OF:
ROUND LAKE BLVD. (C.S.A.H. #9) AND ROOSEVELT ST. (135TH AVE.)
This Agreement made and entered into this
day of .
,1990,
by and between the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, a political subdivision of the State of
Minnesota, 325 East Main Street, Anoka, Minnesota, 55303, hereinafter referred to as "County,"
and the City of Andover, hereinafter referred to as "City".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement desire to jointly cause the construction of
temporary traffic actuated control signals at the intersection of Round Lake Blvd. (C.S.AH. #9)
at Roosevelt St. (135th Ave.); and
WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is in their best interest that the cost of said project
be shared; and,
WHEREAS, said work will be carried out in accordance with the provisions of Minn. Stat.
~ 471.59.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY STIPULATED AND AGREED:
1. PURPOSE
The County and City have joined together for the purpose of installing a temporary
traffic control signal system at the intersections of Round Lake Blvd. (C.S.AH. #9) and Roosevelt
St. (135th Ave.) as described in the plan~ and specifications numbered 88-28-09 on file in the office
of the Anoka County Highway Department and incorporated herein by reference.
:J
2. METIJOD
The County shall provide all engineering services and shall cause the construction
of Anoka County Project No. c.P. 88-28-09 in conformance with said plans and specifications.
The letting of bids and the acceptance of all bid proposals shall be done by the County.
3. COSTS
A The contract costs of the work, or if the work is not contracted, the cost
of all labor, materials, normal engineering costs and equipment rental required to complete the
work, shall constitute the actual "construction costs" and shall be so referred to herein. "Estimated
costs" are good faith projections of the costs which will be incurred for this project. The estimated
costs are attached as Exhibits A, and incorporated herein by reference.
B. Because this is a temporal)' signal there will be no cost to the City for
construction, except the Cost associated with installing power to the signal.
4. TERM
This Agreement shall continue until (1) terminated as provided hereinafter, or (2)
until the construction provided for herein is completed and payment provided for herein is made,
whichever of (1) or (2) shall first occur.
5. DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS
All funds disbursed by the County or City pursuant to this Agreement shall be
disbursed by each entity pursuant to the method provided by law.
6. CONTRAcrS AND PURCHASES
All contracts let and purchases made pursuant to this Agreement shall be made by
the County in conformance to the State Laws.
7. STRIcr ACCOUNTABILITY
A strict accounting shall be made of all funds and report of all receipts and
,~) disbursements shall be made upon request by either party.
8. SIGNALIZATION POWER
:.J The City shall install or cause the installation of an adequate electrical power source
to the service pad or pole including any necessary extensions of power lines. Upon completion
of said traffic control signal installation the ongoing cost of electrical power to the signal shall be
at the cost and expense of the Cities of Andover and Anoka. The two cities shall reach separate
agreement on the cost of power and shall furnish the County with a copy of said agreement by
June 30, 1990.
9. MAINTENANCE
Maintenance of the completed signal and signal equipment will be the sole
obligation of the County. All other maintenance, including the ongoing cost of electrical power
to the signal, will be the responsibility of the City.
10. TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by either party at any time, with or without
cause; upon not less than thirty (30) days written notice delivered by mail or in person to the other
party. If notice is delivered by mail, it shall be deemed to be received two days after mailing.
Such termination shall not be effective with respect to any solicitation of bids or any purchases of
services or goods which occurred prior to such notice of termination.
11. AFFIRMATIVE ACI10N
In accordance with Anoka County's Affirmative Action Policy and the County
Commissioners' policies against discrimination, no person shall illegally be excluded from full-time
employment rights in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the
program which is the subject of this Agreement on the basis of race, creed, color, sex, marital
status, public assistance status, age, disability, or national origin.
~-)
c "
:'-)
--)
12.
NOTICE
For purposes of delivery of any notices hereunder, the notice shall be effective if
delivered to the County Administrator of Anoka County, 325 East Main Street, Anoka, Minnesota,
55303, on behalf of the County, and the City Manager of the City of Andover, 1685 N.W.
Crosstown Blvd., Andover, MN 55304, on behalf of the City.
13. INDEMNIFICATION
The City and the County mutually agree to indemnify and hold harmless each other
from any claims, losses, costs, expenses or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of the
respective officers, agents, or employees relating to activities conducted by either party under this
Agreement.
14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT OF A WRmNG
It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained
herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and all negotiations between the
parties relating to the subject matter thereof, as well as any previous agreement presently in effect
between the parties relating to the subject matter thereof. Any alterations, variations, or
modifications of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced
to writing and duly signed by the parties herein.
..-\
'-)
'--j
. ,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of this Agreement have hereunto set their hands
on the dates written bc1ow:
COUNlY OF ANOKA
By:
Dan Erhart, Chairman
. Anoka County Board of
Commissioners
Dated:
ATTEST:
By:
John "Jay" McLinden
Anoka County Administrator
Recommended for Approval:
By:
Paul K Ruud, County Engineer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Assistant Anoka County Attorney
(DV:Cont\CSAH-9.AND)
. CIlY OF ANDOVER
By:
Dated:
By:
By:
Name: James E. Elling
Title: Mayor
Name: Victoria Volk
Title: City Clerk
City Attorney, City of Andover
~
I
I
!
J
. .
EXHIBIT A
Joint Powers Agrcement
For The
Installation and Maintenance of Temporary Traffic Control Signals
at the Intersection of:
Round Lake Blvd. (C.S.AH. #9) and Roosevelt St. (135th Ave.)
Estimated Costs for the Project are as Follows:
Project C.P. 88c28-09
Temporary Traffic Control System
Control Cabinet
Engineering 8%
$30,000.00
10,000.00
3.200.00
$43,200.00
Total
City Share
Anoka Share
County Share
0%"
0%
100%
- 0 -
- 0 -
$43,200.00
"The City will share in the construction costs of the permanent signal when it is
constructed. The construction will occur when County State Aid Highway No. 9 is
upgraded from 133rd Avenue to County Road No. 116 (Bunker Lake Blvd.)
~
)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 7, 1990
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED FOR
AGE
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Engineering
-(~
ITEM ;J.(). Approve Joint
NQ Powers Agreement/
CSAH 78 & CR 116
BY:
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the Joint Powers
Agreement for the installation of temporary traffic control
signals at the intersection of CSAH No. 78 (Hanson Boulevard) and
County Road No. 116 (Bunker Lake Boulevard).
City share is 0% for the temporary signal but the City will share
in the construction of the permanent signal when itis
constructed. This is expected within a 5 year period.
The City will be responsible to install electrical power source to
the service pad or pole and to pay the ongoing cost of electrical
power to the temporary and permanent signal.
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
:)
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
FOR THE
INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS
AT TIlE INTERSECTION OF:
C.S.A.II. No. 78 (HANSON BLVD.) AND COUNlY ROAD NO. 116
This Agreement made and entered into this
day of
,1990,
by and bctween the County of Anoka, State of Minncsota, a political subdivision of the State of
Minnesota, 325 East Main Street, Anoka, Minnesota, 55303, hereinafter referred to as "County,"
and The City of Andover, hereinafter referred to as "City".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement desire to jointly cause the construction of
temporary traffic actuated control signals at the intersection of C.S.AH. No. 78 (Hanson Blvd.) at
County Road No. 116; and
WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is in their best interest that the cost of said project
be shared; and,
WHEREAS, said work will be carried out in accordance with the provisions of Minn. Stat.
~ 471.59.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY STIPULATED AND AGREED:
1. PURPOSE
The County and City have joined together for the purpose of installing a temporary
traffic control signal system at the intersection of Hanson Blvd. (C.S.AH. # 78) and Bunkcr Lake
Blvd. (c. R. #116) as described in the plans and specifications numbered 90-04-78 on file in the
office of the Anoka County Highway Department and incorporated herein by reference.
2. METHOD
The County shaIl provide all engineering services and shaIl cause the construction
J of Anoka County Project No. c.P. 90-04-78 in conformance with said plans and specifications. The
letting of bids and the acceptance of all bid proposals shaIl be done by the County.
.~
''\
)
- 2 -
3.
COSTS
A The contract costs of the work, or if the work is not contracted, the cost of
all labor, materials, normal engineering costs and equipment rental required to complete the work,
shall constitute the actual "construction costs" and shall be so referred to herein. "Estimated costs"
are good faith projections of the costs which will be incurred for this project. The estimated costs
are attached as Exhibits A. and incorporated herein by reference.
B. Because this is a temporary signal there will be no cost to the City for
construction, except those costs associated with installing and providing power to the signal.,
4. TERM
This Agreement shall continue until (1) terminated as provided hereinafter, or (2)
until the construction provided for herein is completed and payment provided for herein is made,
whichever of (1) or (2) shall first occur.
5. DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS
All funds disbursed by the County or City pursuant to this Agreement shall be
disbursed by each entity pursuant to the method provided by law.
- 3 -
i~J
6.
CONTRACfS AND PURCHASES
Ali contracts iet and purchases made pursuant to this Agreement shall be made by
the County in conformance to the State Laws.
7. STRICf ACCOUNTABILITY
A strict accounting shall be made of all funds and report of all receipts and
disbursements shall be made upon request by either party.
8. SIGNALIZATION POWER
The City shall, at its sole expense, install or cause the installation of an adequate
....
electrical power source to the'service pad or pole, including any necessary extensions of power
lines. Upon completion of said traffic control signai installation the ongoing cost of electrical
power to the signal shall be at the sole cost and expense of the City.
9. MAINTENANCE
Maintenance of the completed signai and signal equipment will be the sole
obligation of the County. All other maintenance, including the ongoing cost of electrical power
to the signal, will be the responsibility of the City.
10. TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by either party at any time, with or without
cause, upon not less than thirty (30) days written notice delivered by mail or in person to the other
party. If notice is delivered by mail, it shall be deemed to be received two days after mailing.
Such termination shall not be effective with respect to any solicitation of bids or any purchases of
se,rvices or goods which occurred prior to such notice of termination.
11. AFFIRMATIVE ACIlON
In accordance with Anoka County's Affirmative Action Policy and the County
Commissioners' policies against discrimination, no person shall illegally be excluded from full-time
) employment rights in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the
- 4 -
f program which is the subject of this Agreement on the basis of race, creed, color, sex, marital
,~) status, public assistance status, age, disability, or national origin.
12. NOTICE
For purposes of delivery of any notices hereunder, the notice shall be effective if
delivered to the County Administrator of Anoka County, 325 East Main Street, Anoka, Minnesota,
55303, on behalf of the County, and the City Manager of the City of Andover, 1685 N. W.
Crosstown Blvd., Andover, MN 55304, on behalf of the City.
13. INDEMNIFICATION
The City and the County mutually agree to indemnify and hold harmless each other
from any claims, losses, costs, expenses or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of the
respective officers, agents, or employees relating to activities conducted by either party under this
Agreement.
14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT OF A WRITING
It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained
herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and all negotiations between the
parties relating to the subject matter thereof, as well as any previous agreement presently in effect
between the parties relating to the subject matter thereof. Any alterations, variations, or
modifications of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced
to writing and duly signed by the parties herein.
')
/
"
,
;
"
'.-j
<J
- 5 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of this Agreement have hereunto set their hands
on the dates written below:
COUNTY OF ANOKA
By:
Dan Erhart, Chairman
Anoka County Board of
Commissioners
Dated:
ATTEST:
By:
John "Jay" McLinden
Anoka County Administrator
Recommended for Approval:
By:
Paul K. Ruud, County Engineer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Assistant Anoka County Attorney
(DV:Cont\CR#116.JPA
CITY OF ANDOVER
By:
Dated:
By:
By:
Name: J amcs E. Elling
Title: Mayor
Name: Victoria Yolk
Title: City Clerk
City Attorney, City of Andover
,-)
~)
- 6 -
EXHIBIT A
Joint Powers Agreement
For The
Installation and Maintenance of Temporary Traffic Control Signals
at the Intersection of:
C.S.AH. No. 78 and County Road No. 116
Estimated Costs for the Project are as Follows:
Project C.P. 90-04-78
Temporary Traffic Control System
Control Cabinet
Engineering
$30,000.00
10,000.00
3.200.00
$43,200.00
Total
City Share
County Share
0% *
100%
0.00
$43,200.00
* The City will share in the construction of the permanent signal when it is constructed. The
construction will occur when C.S.AH. No. 78 at itS intersection with C. R. No. 116 is upgraded.
This is expected within a 5-year period. .
."r'
~)
~J
- 7 -
EXHIBIT B
Cost Sharing Agreement for Projects Constructed
in Anoka County Using County State Aid Funds or Local Tax Levy Dollars
ITEMS
Concrete Curb & Gutter
Concrete Sidewalk
Concrete Sidewalk Replacement
Concrete Curb & Gutter for
Median Construction'
Concrete Median
Grading, Base & Bituminous
Storm Sewer
Traffic Signals
(Communities larger
than 5,000)
Traffic Signal
(Communities less than 5,000)
Engineering Services for
construction
Right of Way
*
COUNlY SHARE
CIlY SHARE
50%
o
100%
50%
100%
o
100%
100%
100%
Based on State
Aid Letter
o
o *
Based on State
Aid Letter
1/2 of the cost of
its legs of the
intersc::tion
the cost of its legs
of the intersection plus
1/2 the cost of the County
legs of the intersection
100%
o **
90+%
8% of its actual construction.
cost
o ***
100%
The County pays .for 100% of a standard Median Design such as plain concrete. If a
community requests decorative median such as red brick, stamped concrete, or exposed
aggregate concrete the City will pay the additionai cost above the cost of standard median.
**
In communities iess than 5,000 people the County pays for 100% of the cost of the traffic
signal effective in March of 1986. The County collects on behalf of the cities (less than
5,000) "Municipal State Aid Dollars" because those cities do not qualify for state aid funds.
These funds are used to pay the City Share.
***
In the event that the City requests purchase of right-of-way in excess. of those right-of-
ways required by county construction the cities participate to the extent an agreement can
be reached in these properties. For instance a city may request a sidewalk be constructed
alongside of one of our roadways which would require additional right of way, in this case
the City may pay for that portion of the right of way. Acquisition of right-of-way for new
alignments shall be the responsibility of the City requesting the alignment.
)
.~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
August 7, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
~
ITEM
NO.
21. Release Escrow/Red
Oaks Manor 5th &
BY:
The City Council is requested to release the remalnlng escrow for
Red Oaks Manor 5th and 6th Additions in the amount of $107.08.
The escrow that is to be released are funds that were available
for attorney fees, sign fees, engineering, etc.
COUNCIL ACTION
, -'\
'-../'
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY