HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC July 3, 1990
.~
'\
'J
****************************************************************
*~***********~************************************************~*
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ >t*
...... **
...~ >t*
:: WHAT'S HAPPENING ?J6'b'::
~... >t>t
...~ >t*
...... >t*
...... **
~~ **
...... >t>t
~... >t*
...~ **
~~ >t*
...~ **
...... >t*
...... **
:: Union Labor Agreement ::
...... >t>t
:: The Union was notified that the City Council ::
...... approved the contract subject to the Union **
:: approving ~he Anoka County Summer Youth Program. ::
... **
...... **
...... The Union responded by phone (Business agent >t*
:: Larry Bastian) and also by letter (attorney Gary::
:: Bastian) stating failure to execute the::
~~ neg6tiated labor agreement is an unfair labor ~~**
:: practice (see attached letter). ::
...... >t*
...... >t*
...... Andover's representative, Cy Smythe, responded >t*
:: to the Union's attorney the city's position. I ::
...... will have a copy of Cy's letter by the Council **
...... **
...... meeting. **
...... **
...... **
...... Frank contacted the county about the availability **
:: of youth for the Summer Youth Program and was told ::
:... it is late in the season and we probably will not **
...: be able to get youth at this time. It will, of ::
:: course, depend on the ability to resolve the issue *:
:... of the Union signing the release. The Youth progra~*
...: will not replace any existing or potential full time::
:... employee nor affect their overtime. *~
... *~
...... **
...... **
...... **
...... **
"'", **
"'", **
:'" **
...'" **
",'" >t*
",'" **
...'" **
",'" **
'" **
"'... >t*
:'" **
",'" **
'" ~
"'... **
...... **
"'", **
:'" >t*
... ~
"'", **
:'" **
'" ~
"'",*************************************************************>t
................................................................
.~
.~J
GARY W. BASTIAN
ATIORNEY AT LAW
Suite # 502
3001 University Avenue S.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55414.3383
Telephone (612) 331-8955
Fax # (6~2) 331.8948
, ';., ~. ',' I" ,
'I il '," Ii,. ,i
~~'~ :... - ~1
t.~ } ~ Lt~~ \~I/ J:..""l"-.!
,.."". j
.i~ ~1~"~"'.;";"I~;;'ll
I
I
,
I
I
I
.... .
CITY OF /' ~,~.,""r!\/r:-.'"
~4-~- 1::'$ 2..
June 26, 1990
James E. Schrantz
City Administrator
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W.,
Andover, Minnesota 55304
Re: Andover/Union Labor Agreement for 1990
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
Your June 25th letter to Lawrence M. Bastian has been referred to my office for response.
Your letter indicates the Andover City Council gave conditional approval to the Minnesota
Teamster Public and Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local No. 320 Labor Agreement
covering the City's Public Works employees.
In a mediation session conducted on May 6, 1990, by the State Bureau of Mediation Services
[Case No.90-PN-648] City of Andover representatives made an offer of settlement. The Union
brought this offer to its membership in good faith. The offer did not contain any mention of the
Anoka County Summer Youth Program.
According to Mr. Lawrence Bastian. at no time during the negotiation or mediation process did
the City or its representatives (Jim Schrantz or Cy Symthe) place this issue on the table. Mr.
Lawrence Bastian has contacted the State Mediator Ken Palmer. Mr. Palmer's records show no
mention of this issue being brought up or settlement being contingent on the Union's approval
of the Summer Youth Program.
PELRA requires the public employer to implement an executed Labor Agreement. Failure to
execute the negotiated Labor Agreement is an unfair labor practice.
Q
- 55;2.
Fax w
~ver
155"- 5/CO
7'55- 89~3
()
,~J
Local No. 320 believes the 1990 Labor Agreement is settled and should be implemented
immediately. I have been instructed to pursue this matter should the City delay implementation
beyound the next regularly scheduled City Council Meeting.
cc Lawrence M. Bastian
Ray Sowada
/
n
'-Y
...~,;., ,;.;. ,...
00/29/90 14:02
FAX 612 546 1552
LRA
~OOl
'.
.~J
LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES. INC.
7501 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley. Minnesota 55427
612/546.1470
FAX: 6121546-1552
June 28, 1990
Post-It~ brand fax transmittal memo 7671 ~otp39.'" a..
T~i0'"". ~-\\~{\\\'\z:.. FI'<l"t..V ~1~:-'\(J,'1.-Q.
co. r\ _ \_. -0 _ Co. Cfl-A .
f--l:< .("'(.. ~ '
Oept. PIlOn.' 'O-lL. - It-[70
raxt 1.55-~ rnx:-; L{ (0 - f"U'5~
Mr. Gary W. Bastian
Attorney At Law
suite No. 502
3001 University Avenue S. E.
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3383
RE: Your June 26, 1990 Letter to James E. Schrantz
Dear Mr. Bastian:
Your letter implies that persons designated by unions and employers
at the bargaining/mediation table should have the ability to bind
those :they represent without a 'process of ratificat~on. by the
groups they represent. Of course the facts of negot~t~ons are
different. Persons sent by unions and employers to'negotiations
and mediation must return to those they represent with reports
and/or recommendations. The represented groups decide to accept or
reject with or without conditions the recommendations of their
representatives.
In the case involving the city of Andover and Teamsters Local No.
320, the representatives of the parties negotiated both directly
and through the services of the Minnesota Bureau of Mediation
Services. A tentative agreement VIas reached in m.ediation which was
recommended by the representatives to their respective
constituents. The employees accepted the Union representatives'
recommendations. The Andover City council viewed the city
representatives' recommendations for settlement in light of newly
revealed information that the Union was attempting to effectively
prevent the city from an offering seasonal employment opportunities
to local youths.
The city Council regarded this Union action as an unfair gesture
Which would arbitrarily deprive local youths of needed summer
income. The city, therefore, refused to accept without condition
~-.J the te.ntative settlement.
The city sees no reasonable basis union actions which have the
effect of preventing the City from offering some income generating
opportunities to local young persons. Many of the youths looking
.
hO/29/90 14:02
FAX 012 546 1552
LRA
[4]002
~)
for summer work are students who need the income to complete their
education. The city believes that its employees and the Union do
not want to deprive local Andover youths of such opportunities.
If you require further information, please let me know.
sn~~
W~Jsmyt~e
cc: James E. Schrantz
Larry M. Bastian
Kenneth Palmer
:~
DATE: July 3, 1990
.~ ')
-~
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Special Planning & zoning Commission Minutes (6/14/90)
Special Closed City Council Minutes (6/19/90)
Regular City Council Minutes (6/19/90)
Park & Recreation Commission Minutes (6/21/90)
Expenditure Guideline (1/1/90 - 4/30/90)
Revenue Guideline (1/1/90 - 4/30/90)
Letter from Andrew Revering, Anoka Police Dept. (6/26/90)
News Release from MPCA (6/25/90)
Contract Report from Anoka County Sheriff (May, 1990)
Metropolitan & Community Development Committee Minutes (6/7/90)
Special City Council Minutes (6/13/90)
Red Oaks Manor 6th Addition, Elevations
Letter from Doris A. Nivala (6/22/90)
Letter from Tim Yantos, Anoka County (6/18/90)
Copy of Notice of Appeal of Special Assessment, Rosella Sonsteby
Memorandum from Moe Dorton (5/7/90)
Statement from Dorton Poquette (5/1 - 5/31/90)
Memo from Howard Koolick (6/27/90)
Letter from Rep. Teresa Lynch
Memo from Howard Koolick, re: vacation policy (6/27/90)
Financial Statements (12/31/89)
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT
AGENDA.
,
\ THANK YOU.
.-..-1
15544 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E.
HAM LAKE, MINNESOTA 55304
434.9555
10 :s. E . t;/Z (0/9 ()
c.c 7 3~ It<
f,t,-- _..-x? 0
'It\\r; .:-...:_- ;:. "..:
& ~ .i U t'J 2 5 1 :-g~O-~l ~,)'
..v,. '; ~~
-.---- .
CITY OF N~D~;E~
r "-
'-~
CITY OF HAM LAKE
June 22, 1990
James Schrantz
City Administrator
city of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Jim:
'--,
At their meeting on June 18, 1990, the Ham Lake city Council
discussed scheduling a joint meeting with the Andover city
Council to discuss the construction of university Avenue and
other items of mutual interest. We would like to schedule
this meeting sometime in July.
Please call me so that we can discuss a date for this
meeting.
sincerely,
u~
Doris A. Nivala
AdministratoriClerkjTreasurer
~
.~
, '.-j'
, ":~~'
CO U N TY
OF
ce.
. 7/s/fio
ANOKA
---
/0
Office of tire County Board of Commissioners
COURTHOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA55303 612-421-4760
:.~.,. E r-tt1-U t; n
HF;lU
CITY OF ANDOVER
June 18, 1990
Mr. James E. Schrantz
Administrator, City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW.
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
For your information and file, please be advised that the Anoka County Board at the most
recent meeting of Tuesday, June 12, 1990, adopted the attached Resolution #90-56 Relating
to Approval of the 2010 Comprehensive Transportation Plan of Anoka County. The final version
of the plan will be available sometime in July and will be mailed to you at that time.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.
\iAn~
Tim Yantos
Deputy County Administrator
TY:pd
Enclosure
,J
Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer
$.J~I
,....
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Anoka County, Minnesota
DATE: June 12, 1990
RESOLUTION #90.56
,)
OFFERED BY COMMISSIONERS: Erhart, Haas Steffen, Langfeld, Kordlak and Cenaiko
RELATING TO APPROVAL OF
THE 201.0 COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
OF ANOKA COUNlY
WHEREAS, the 1976 Minnesota State Legislature passed into law the Land Planning Act
relating to the orderly and controlled use of lands within the State of Minnesota and the seven
county metropolitan area; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the afore-referenced Land Planning Act, the County Board
of Anoka County, in concert with respective department heads, prepared and transmitted to the
Metropolitan Council this Comprehensive Plan detailing the metropolitan system under control of
the County planning; and,
WHEREAS, on January 7, 1982, the Metropolitan Council adopted Resolution #82.5 which
provides for the adoption of this comprehensive plan as submitted by the County Board on April
6, 1981; and,
WHEREAS, on October 26, 1982, the Anoka County Board adopted Resolution #82-64
approving the comprehensive plan of Anoka County; and,
WHEREAS, over the past 8 years, the transportation section of the comprehensive plan of
Anoka County has needed clarifications and up dating; and,
WHEREAS, the need for public transit has been identified and the necessity of providing
effective connections between the various modes of transportation is recognized by the Anoka
County Board; and,
WHEREAS, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners has caused the preparation of the
"2010 Comprehensive Transportation Plan of Anoka County;"
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Anoka County Board of Commissioners that
they do hereby approve the 2010 Comprehensive Transportation Plan of Anoka County.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be forwarded to the local units
of government, Metropolitan Council, respective department heads and review agencies.
YES ' NO
District #1 - Haas Steffen
District #2 - Burman
District #3 . Langfeld
District #4 - Kordiak
District #5 - Cenaiko
District #6 - McCarron
District #7 - Erhart
X
Abstain
X
X
X
Absent
X
Haas Steffen
Burman
Langfeld
Kordiak
Cenaiko
McCarron
Erhart
;
,
,J
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) SS
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
I, John "Jay" McUnden, County Administrator, Anoka County, Minnesota, hereby certify that
I have compared the foregoing copy of the resolution of the County Board of said County with the
original record thereof on file in the Administration Office, Anoka County, Minnesota, as stated in
the minutes of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting duly held on June 12, 1990, and that
the same is a true and correct copy of said original record and of the whole thereof, and that said
resolution was duly passed by said Board at said meeting.
Witness my hand and seal this 12th day of June, 1990.
~~ $/'1-
JO N "JA '(" CL~EN 6-
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
, .
,-J
'\
'J
""'OR "tT"......n T....-T""":n"""""'':' . ~
J: .L rVU~:L ...N.rvili'l.i.l-.l'IOH
Qt'1fJfqo
TO: Andover city Clerk - victoria Volk
Rosella Sonsteby
Notice of Appeal of
Special Assessment
Project 86-1't
Dehn's Pond
Appellant
vs.
City of Andover
Assessor and Respondent
I
Rosella Sonsteby hereby appeal to the District Court the Special
Assessment to her property in the amount of Seven Thousand
Eighty-Seven Dollars and Forty Seven Cents.
II
That the assessment is pursuant to Project No. 86-19 Storm
Drainage Dehn's Pond.
III
That the grounds of the Appeal are inter alia that the property
of the Appellants which is assessed is in fact not specially
benefited by the Project, and the special assessment exceeds the
special benefit which the appellants property receives from the
project.
That the grounds also of the Appeal property was not assessed
according to City of Andover assessment policy adopted by City
Council on September 7, 1976 or Minnesota Statue 435.19 Special
Assessments, "Governmental Units".
IV
That the Andover city Council met at 7:30 p.m. on the 5th day of
June 1990, at the City Hall and passed the assessment.
~
\.Y
,
. ~
,~
--,)
v
That the Municipal Clerk is hereby requested to furnish the
appellants with a certified copy of the objections filed in the
assessment proceedings, the assessment roll or the part
pertaining to appellants and any or all papers necessary to
present the appeal.
VI
That a copy of the Letter to the Property Owner concerning this
assessment are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit
A.
~-~~
Dated this 19 day of June 1990.
G
.:~
Research
Planning
Analysis
{6 C C.
~ ~>>()
Consultants
1932 Dupont Ave. So.
Minneapolis, MN 55403
(612) 374-4969 or(612J 377 -6691
DORTON POQUETTE Associates
May 7, 1990
Memorandum
To: Anoka Landfill EIS Review Team
cc: Charles Weaver
Greg Korstad
Jim Schrantz
Bill Ottensmann
From: Moe Dorton~
Subject: Project Status Report
Enclosed is your executed copy of our joint consulting agreement
with Coon Rapids and Andover. I have also enclosed a copy,?f the
March summary billing. The release of the technical reports for
our review has been very slo~ and the Draft EIS will not likely be
completed until sometime in the mid-summer.
o Technical Report Schedule: The revised schedule for
the release of technical reports for our review is:
Hay, 1990
Airport Impacts
Health Risk Assessment
Historic/Archeological
June, 1990
Landfill Engineering
Hydro-Geological Impacts
Socio-Economic Impacts - Partial
o The Metropolitan Council has delayed the release and
the re,'iew of the socio-economic study on property
values. The Council will undertake an additional study
of th~ methodology used by Anoka county's consultant.
This ~ill delay completion of the report and the Draft
EIS until ~id-summer.
I
o Monthly Billings: A reminder that monthly billings
should be sent to me within ten days following the end
of the month. To date, I have not received any monthly
billings from Lyle Bradley, JMM, or ERM North Central.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
,-)
7-D ?/'V? C)
DORTON POQUETTE Associates
Consultants
,)
Research
Planning
Analysis
1932 Dupont Ave. So.
Minneapolis, MN 55403
(612)3744969or(612l377-6691
STATEMENT OF CHARGES
May 1 - May 31, 1990
June 6, 1990
Mr. William Ottensmann
City Engineer
City of Coon Rapids
1313 East Coon Rapids Blvd.
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
Charges: Coon Rapids/Andover Anoka Landfill EIS Review Project
May, 1990
Summary:
Consulting Hours:
Maurice Dorton
Mary Louise Poquette
3.25 hours @ $75 per hour
1.25 hours @ $75 per hour
$ 243.75
93.75
Direct Expenses:
''-........,
.........
Automobile
Copies/FAX
Postage
Maps
Total May,
Mileage 53 miles @ $0.24 per mile
1990 Charges
12.72
5.54
3.25
12.05
$ 371. 04
Consultin~ Activity:
During this billing period the following consulting activities were
undertaken:
o
o
to be
,~ mkd: 06.Bill
rn"" .-'..'''''''-,
~.''''
.,
J \
.\ i
,.J~J
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
James. E. Schrantz, City Administrator
Howard D. Koolick, Finance Director
June 27, 1990
Status of Request for SAC Refunds from MWCC
I would like to take a minute of your time to update you on the
status of the City's request for SAC refunds from Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission.
On Tuesday, June 12th, the operations and Budget Committee met and
approved a resolution extending the SAC refund program to the City
of Andover. Based on staff's recommendation, the resolution was
approved without discussion and forwarded to the full Commission
for approval.
.
On Tuesday, June 19th the full Commission met and approved the
resolution as part of their consent agenda. I have contacted MWCC
and requested a copy of the resolution for our files.
The approval of the resolution included requiring the City to
prepare the documentation necessary to conduct an audit. I am
currently preparing this documentation and expect to complete it
around July 10th.
A letter was sent to all residents who requested refunds from the
money held by MWCC explaining the delay and making them aware that
the process should be completed by early fall.
I
/
. '\
......~
1a C'C '-%/10 ---
Rep. Teresa Lynch
Minnesota
House of
Representatives
.- '\ District 50A
,-j
Anoka County
Dear Friend,
For business people, the 1990 legislative session was another one of those "It Could Have
Been Worse" sessions.
Controlling the damage began with high-priced minimum wage bills and extended on into
plant-closing legislation. Business took some direct hits particularly in the area of taxes.
I'd like to briefly review some of the issues and actions of the session. Much of what
happened will have an impact on your business and on the economy of our communities and
state.
When the dust settled, labor emerged from the session with a surprising number of gains
__ many of them at the expense of business interests. It seemed to me that the Boise incident
up in International Falls characterized the political intimidation of businesses that carried on
through the session.
Businesses paid a big price for "solving" the budget shortfall, which wasn't really solved at
all. Half of the new tax burden was imposed on businesses.
Another shortfall-solving device is the new business "sucker tax," more politely known as
a franchise fee.
Another big failure was the Legislature's caving in to those who insisted on spending a
portion of the budget reserve. Tapping the reserve this year guarantees that the overspending
problem will revisit the Legislature again next year.
Speaking of the reserve, I supported a measure that would have established "triggers" by
which reserve funds would be automatically released. This would help prevent the reserve
from being used as a political slush fund. The idea was initially suggested by people from the
business community, but unfortunately it was defeated.
One small victory for business was the/shelving of plant-closing legislation. I say "small"
because it was replaced with something else - that new payroll tax to be used to finance a
workers dislocation fund.
The original minimum wage proposal was brought down to a more realistic level, too.
The original proposal set it at $5.45. But the minimum wage legislation that finally passed was
a compromise of $4.50 for businesses with annual gross sales above $362,500, and $4.00 for
businesses with sales below this figure.
\
,~
4681 161st Lane NW, Andover, Minnesota 55304
State OHice Building, SI. Paul, Minnesota 55155
(612) 421-3522
(612) 296-5369
NOT PRINTED AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE
s~..
- '\
. )
\.__/
The worker's compensation issue was handed to organized labor without even a peep. In
view of the work comp reform vetoes of the last three years, many legislators seemed to think
resurrecting the issue will only be worthwhile when we get new leadership in the governor's
office.
Prevailing wage, parental leave, successor law, expanded medical leave - these and others
add up to a surprisingly large number of business-related bills to pass in a short off-year
legislative session.
What seems out of balance is the Legislature's ability to judge when it is proper for
government to intrude into the marketplace and to become involved in decisions between
employer and employee. Heavily coloring its inability to make good judgment is the political
atmosphere in which organized labor carries such penetrating influence, particularly with the
liberal leadership.
As a business person, you are part of the economic engine of "our community and of our
state. We need policies that encourage business decisions to expand and create new jobs, and
policies that create a "level playing field" on which to compete. Anyone with the will and the
means should be able to go into business without fear of being over-taxed, over-regulated and
intimidated by state leaders.
I have enjoyed representing you another term in the Minnesota House, and I appreciate
your calls and letters which give me useful direction on many difficult decisions. Please feel
free to contact me with questions or comments on these issues or any others you may be
concerned about.
Sincerely,
" )
't~
..~~)
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
James. E. Schrantz, City Administrator
Howard D. Koolick, Finance Director
June 27, 1990
Interpretation of Vacation Policy
Last week Debby poirier, shirley Clinton and myself attended the
. training session for the new computerized payroll system. While
we were building our files, the following question was raised
regarding the vacation policy:
Is the intent of the vacation policy to give each employee a
number of hours per year which accrue monthly or a number of
hours per month. (i.e. 80 hour per year or 6.66 hours per
month. )
I discussed this question with Jim Schrantz who believed the
intent was for the number of hours per year.
I also contacted Don Jacobson to ask his interpretation of the
policy and if the personnel committee would amend the policy to
specifically state the vacation in yearly amounts. He agreed the
intent was for hours in a year, but since the difference was so
slight, amending the policy was not needed and we could build the
payroll files to meet the stated intent.
Below is summary of the difference:
Hours Hours for Intended
Service Per Month 12 Months Hours
During 1st 6/: 66
through 5th year 79.92 80
6th year ,7.33 87.96 88
7th year 8.00 96.00 96
8th year 8.66 103.92 104
9th year 9.33 111. 96 112
10th thru 15th year 10.00 120.00 120
16th year and
thereafter 13.33 159.96 160
'-)
.
, \
~~
~)
These differences result from rounding errors in the policy. The
new payroll system can accommodate the intended hours with little
problem.
The purpose of this memo is to inform City Council of this
decision. Please contact me ~f there is any disagreement with
this memo.
/u-C. C. /-V3:::-i'o
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Hfth Street
SI. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Tel. 612-291.o359f1DD 291-0004
')
'--./
MINUTES OF THE METROPOLITAN AND COMMUNIlY DEVELOPMENT COMMITIEE
Council Chambers
June 7, 1990
2:a<:J pm.
Committee Members Present: Chair Gertrude Ulrich, Alfred Babington-Johnson, David FISher, Mary Hauser, Kenneth
Kunzman, Mike McLaughlin, James Senden
Committee Members Absent: None
Other Council Members Present: Dirk devries, Dottie Rietow, Marcy Waritz, Margaret Schreiner
Stall Present: Unda Hennessey, Kate Houston, Steven Schwanke, Marion Angelica, Chuck Ballentine, Carl Ohm, Anne
Hurlburt, Hal Freshley, Alex Edmund-DaHinten, Jack Frost, Robert Overby, Paul Baltzersen, Karen Patraw
Others Present: Land Use Advisory Committee Members: Stephen Bubul, Michael Hoffman, Gerald Stelzcl, Neil Weber,
Jude Olcney, Frank Simon, Richard Uttle; Mayor Marilyn Schultz, Ham Lake; Commissioner Margaret langfeld,
Commissioner Natalie Steffen, Jim Piera, Anoka County; Allan Nordin, David Jen.sen, Dennis Michaelson, Unwood Township;
Sherri Anderson, East Bethel; Mike Blaclc, James R. Hill, we; Tom Klassen, Columbus Town Board; Edward Stevens, Lake
Elmo; Mike Wozniak, Rosemount; Carol Mordorski; Dave Drealan, Carver County; Bob Wilbur, CFI Mortgage Company;
U Broberg. Greenfield; Barbara Kalluslcy, Helen Baker, Afton; W. J. Dufresne, Columbus Township; John Forrest, Otto Ped,
Dakota County; Bart Bartels. Coon Rapids; d'Arcy Bosell, SI. Francis School District 15; Terry Forbord, Lundgren Bres.
Const.. Wayzata; Ken Kopka, Mortgage Banker; Gretchen Sabel, Jay Blake, Andover; Undberg Elcola, Kathy Bongard, Marty
Schmitz, Shakopee; Cindy Petrie, Woodbury; Todd Lein, Lewiston; AI Layman, SI. Paul; Ellen Irish, Apple Valley; Paul
Wagenaar, Coon Rapids; Bob Fors, Minneapolis; John Hilgers, Bill King, Waconia; Beverly Topp, Lakeville; Merland Otto,
Ramsey; Brian Helmken, Bides. Assn. ofMN; R. Wilbur, Brooklyn Center; Steven Peaslee. Hassan Twp; Don Hndel!, Fridley;
Dick Hinkle, Elk River; Dave Doll. Ham Lake
Committee Chair Ulrich called the meeting to order at 2:05 p.rn. McLaughlin moved and Kunzman seconded approval of
the agenda and minutes of May 24, 1990. The motion carried.
ARTS ADVISORY COMMfITEE RECOMMENDATIONS ON IT 91 FUNDING FORMULA FOR MINNESOTA'S
REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIlS (From Committee Consent List)
Babington-Johnson moved and McLaughlin seconded the recommendation.
That the Metropolitan and Community Development Committee r=mmend that the Metropolitan Council Regional Arts
Council adopt the IT 90 formula which maintains an organizational adjustment for FY 91.
The motion carried.
REVISIONS TO THE METROPOLITAN REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL BIENNIAL SPENDING PLAN (IT 90-91) (From
Committee Consent List)
Babington-Johnson moved and McLaughlin seconded the r=mmendation.
That the Metropolitan Council adopt the revised 1990-91 Spending Plan for the activities of the Metropolitan Regional Arts
Council '
The motion carried.
CI1Y OF YOUNG AMERICA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, 4.7 ACRES METROPOLITAN URBAN
SERVICE AREA ADDmON, REFERRAL FILE 15046-2, DISTRICf 14
~J
Steven Scbwanke, comprehensive planning staff, reviewed the findings and r=mmendations for Young America's proposed
comprehensive plan amendment to extend the MUSA by 4.7 acres.
1. The city of Young America has submitted a plan amendment to extend the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA)
by 4.7 acres of which 2.7 acres is roadway and the remaining two acres is proposed for commercial use. This proposed
Metropolitan and Community Development Committee
Minutes of June 7, 1990
Page 2
MUSA addition does not appear to have an adverre impact on metropolitan facilities and systems.
2. Expansion of the MUSA by 4.7 acres is consistent with MDIF criteria for incremental changes to tbe urban service
area.
3. Young America was informed in Jan. 1990, that it was necessary for the city to bring their comprebensive plan into
compliance with tbe Metropolitan Council's Wastewater Treatment and HandlinR Plan. The principal issue is that the
city's comprehensive plan does not address the management and reduction of nonpoint source pollution.
4. The proposed plan amendment will not adverrely impact the Metropolitan Disposal System.
McLaughlin moved and Kunzman seconded the recommendations.
1. That the Metropolitan Council adopt the above findings and the staff report as part of these recommendations.
2. 1bat the Metropolitan Council approve this plan amendment and that no plan modification is required.
3. That tbe city of Young America revise its comprehensive sewer plan base map to sbow the area proposed for sanitary
sewer service.
4. 1bat the city of Young America submit tbe Metropolitan Council a comprehensive plan amendment that addresses
nonpoint source pollution.
The motion carried.
1991 WORK PROGRAM PROSPECTUS
Marion Angelica, human services director, reviewed the buman services goals for the 1991 work: program prospectus (talking
primarily about new options).
Goal 5: Housing. Promo/e and guide the orderly d~lopment of housing in the Metropolitan Area taking into account
changing demographics and housing needs. Emphasis will continue to be on meeting the housing needs of people of all income
1~1s. ages and abiliMs, in a variety of geographic locations.
Discussion included tbe proposed work: that could be done by the Housing Task Force; Council policy regarding loca1land
use ordinances; that convening housing and service providers and evaluating housing policy is important and ties in with other
policy plans.
Under Metro HRA Planning, discussion included that it's not a good idea for the Council's HRA to get into housing
ownership; that other types of certificate programs should be evaluated; the housing programs in Anoka and Minneapolis;
that the Metro HRA could act as a vehicle for community reinvestment banks to work: through the Metro HRA to establish
housing options in the suburbs; the need to deal with one agency; the Neighborhood Housing Service model; and the need
for staff to focus on a model for operation on a regional basis.
Goal 6. Human Investment Framework Development Project. Set up proctSSes to look aJ 1wman investmmJ issues and social
problems in the seven-<ounty metropolitan region in a more integraJive way, and assist policymaken and service provid= to
anticipate fUture 1wman investmml issues and addrtSS them in effective and innovative ways.
.'
Goal 9: Service System fO( Older People. Ensure that older people in the Metropolitan Area have access to and are able to
obtain needed assistance through a system of fonnal and infonnal services that is comp-ehensive, coordinated and responsive
to individual needs.
The committee suggested including the federal definition of the word elderly.
Goal 10: StiJtwlaJe development of a regional health system that meets the health needs of the metropolitan col1llTW11iJy in a
cOsl-efficient fTI/J1I1lU.
Discussion included that the health guide chapter needs to be reviewed; the need to study models for preventive care; and
the Council's involvement in the universal health care issue.
Metropolitan and Community Development Committee
Minutes of June 7, 1990
Page 3
"
'0 Goal 30. Lifelong and IntegraJed Education. To develop visions of lifelong education necessary in tM region to meet lhe future
economic and socioJ values and demands of an integrated, rapidly changing society and nation.
Discussion and comments included the need to work: more ~Iosely with MIAC; the issue of equitable distribution of
educational resources in the region; the need to identify gaps in the education program (availability, transportation); and that
lifelong education means people will have more than one career.
Goal 31. Assess current and future cultural needs of the region's population, develop polkies and plans to address these needs.
Staff presented two new goals identified by the MIAC Committee:
Economic Impact of Racism on lhe Refion. Goal would be to design and carry out studies that describe the situation of people
of color in tM current and future work force and tM current and future regional economy. Develop proposals to eru:ourage
mmority worken fullest participation in tM region ~ economy.
Criminal Justice: Assure tM criminal justice system treaJs all people with equity. Apply Council research planning and policy
development approm:hes to assist tM region ~ criminal justice system toward this goal
Discussion included the past work Council performed in criminal justice and the decision-making process for the various
options. Staff asked the Council members to carefully consider all the options before malcing their selections.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS BRIEFlNG
Chuck: Ballentine, research division manager, briefed the committee on telecommunications by reviewing the background
material, past Council involvement, current ways the Council is involved, current interest locally and some possible action
options for consideration.
The meeting was adjourned at 4;06 pm.
PUBLIC MEETING TO EXAMINE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL POLICIES
FOR THE RURAL SERVICE AREA
Committee Chair Genrude Ulrich called the public meeting to order at 4;10 p.rn.
Carl Ohm, research and long range planning staff, explained the p'urpose and process of the study of the Council's rural
density policies. He reviewed the topics of issues papers and background studies that have been prepared by the staff. Ohm
explained that the next phase of the study would be to address the following issues: refine land uses appropriate in the rural
areas; review the Council's development density policies; discuss implementation approaches such as clustering and lot sizes;
and examine the need for policies for rural areas that may eventually be incorporated in the MUSA (transition areas).
Mayor Marilyn Schultz, Ham Lake, COOlOlented that 93 percent of Aoolca County is not in conformance with the Council's
current policies. Anolca County doesn't fit the definition of either rural or urban; that it is a grey area in between. The
Council should acknowledge that it is appropriate to provide lifestyle choices. For an area that is neither urban or rural, she
suggested the term "exurbia," which is defined in the dictionary as a ~mi-rural residential area beyond the suburbs. She said
that the Council should develop policies for this exurban area, including density for both permanent or transitional rural areas.
Regiona~ as well local service costs, should be considered! Septic systems, and alternatives to the systems if they fail, should
also be reviewed. She complimented the Council's proCess for the study of the rural policies and indicated that she was
pleased with their williogness to listen. She said that Ham Lake wants to participate in the policy development process as
it proceeds.
.
Commissioner Margaret Laogfeld, Aoolca County, COOlOlented on the diversity of Aoolca County. A strict set of rules should
be less important than achieving final goals. Plans must be adaptable to loca.l situations. Commercial development in the
rural area is needed to serve the residents and strengthen the tax base. Residents need a choice of residential opportunities.
Public services should follow the people.
:'-J
Commissioner Natalie Haas Steffen, Aoolca County, indicated that the county bas some of the same concerns as they did in
1975. Local governments should be able to control their own destiny when there is no impact on metropolitan systems.
Communities partly in the urban service area have concern that even though capacity may be available in the regional sewer
system, they are frustrated in waiting for services to be provided. There are large communities in Aoolca County with over
Metropolitan and Community Development Committee
Minutes of June 7, 1990
Page 4
5,000 population which object to being called .rural. communities. She said that they were not really urban or rural, and
suggested the term .rurban." Commissioner Steffen said that the current policies don't recognize the technological changes
in septic systems. Commercial ventures in the rural area are currently not allowed by policy and tbat is a problem. The
FHA's financing policy should also be reviewed. A large amount of land in Anolc.a County is state-{)Wlled or park land, which
should be considered in tbe density policy. There is an ongoing problem with an understatement of Anolc.a County's
population. The difference between agricultural land and a general rural use area should be recognized. Policies that don't
won: should not be retained. Many communities don't understand why they are considered out of compliance with Council
policies when their comprehensive plan was approved by the Metropolitan Council. The Council should reevaluate its
population forecasts and consider that Anolc.a County is not farmland. She said tbat the county feels there is a need for
another Mississippi River bridge. Even though it's not in the 2010 transportation plan, it must be planned for today and the
county is holding tax forfeited land to preserve needed right-{)f-way. The issues of public services in Anolc.a County are
county-wide, not just for the urban area.
AI1an Nordin, linwood Township, commented that a 2 1/2 acre lot size development is the pattern in linwood Township.
He stated tbat the linwood plan was consistent with Council policy when it was reviewed. On a community-wide basis, the
township is consistent with the 1110 density. On-site systems work well in their sandy soils; but he hopes that someday, if
metropolitan sewers are needed, they will be available to his community. He said that the census count for this area is way
off.
Sherri Anderson, city of East Bethel, commented that East Bethel has 49 square miles and over 8,000 residents. There are
few problems with sewer systems and codes are strictly enforced. The city requires a 2 1/2 acre minimum lot size with one
acre of buildable area. The city wants to continue moderate commercial and residential growth. The city does not have good
ag land and probably has a 1-for-10 density if lakes and low lands are considered. She indicated that flexibility is needed.
Mike Black, from James R. Hill, Inc., stated that the Council should anticipate transitional areas beyond the MUSA where
sewer may be extended, and support longer range planning to avoid problems in the future.
Tom Klassen, Columbus Town Board, commented that the township doesn't follow the 4-for-40 policy, but still has a very
low overall density, about 1 unit per 18 1/2 acres. He said that he also wishes to be involved in the process.
Edward Stevens, Lake Elmo Planning and Zoning Commission, read from a letter published in the Metro Monitor which
advocates discouraging more development in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. The Council should work with state
government to encourage development in growth centers outside the Metropolitan Area.
Mike Wozniak, city of Rosemount, commented that industrial areas outside of the MUSA should be addressed by the policy
study. There are special problems with sewer systems and water quality for such development, but they need to be
a=mmodated to allow for jobs and tax base.
Carol Mordorski said that she is concerned about urban sprawl. The 1 for 10 policy allows urban sprawl at a mini scale. It
does not allow enough density to be developed to provide sewers. Sprawl compromises the transportation system and does
DOt allow for development of mass transit. Sprawl results in more freeways at the expense of better mass transit. No bus
service between suburbs is a problem. Schools in the suburbs are perceived as better and lead to a drop in the quality of
city schools. She said the Council should control the rate of growth and not let the Twin Oties Metropolitan Area turD into
a Los Angeles.
Dave Drealan, Carver County, remarked that a 2 1/2 acre; lot size does not guarantee adequate area for a septic system.
Regulations should be more related to the performance cpteria. It is possible to have 20 acres without an adequate site for
a septic system. Lot size is not a magic solution. Drealan suggested that the fiDaI policies not provide a list of appropriate
rural land uses, but performance standards instead. One criteria should be whether it is necessary to locate a use in the rural
area. Carver County's policy is to support development in the rural centers, which means that some uses should be limited
in the general rural use or agricultural areas. Carver County allows clustering in non-prime agricultural areas that are suitable
for on-site systems within the overall 4-fOl'-40 density. He said that 4-for-40 density does not preserve ag land if a 10 acre
lot size is required, but that clustering can be used if done correctly.
Bob Wilbur, CFl Mortgage Company, stated that a 1.for-10, 4-for-40 density will make it barder for young families to move
to the rural area because of high land costs.
:~
Metropolitan and Community Development Committee
Minutes of June 7, 1990
Page 5
l..i Broberg, Greenfield, asleed that the Council upbold the current guidelines and renew its commitment to agricultural
preservation. The guidelines sbould not be revised. The Council sbould enforce the current policies. Sbe cited conflicts
between five acre lot owners and farmers whicb gradually destroy agriculture in an area. Sbe suggested establishing greenbelt
areas between urban areas and agricultural areas. She recoliunended five points for the Council to consider:
1. The Council sbould recognize that ag land is not just waiting for development, that it is a precious resource for food
production.
2. A bousing density of at least 1.for-10 should be enforced.
3. The Council should investigate more creative ways to encourage farming. Current programs are not enough. New
policies should recognize the changes in farming and farming other than large<<ale commercial agriculture.
4. The Council should realize that many decisions combine to destroy farm land and the effect on farm land should be
considered with all Council decisions.
5. The Council should consider food security and safety, rather than sbort.term needs of individual farmers wbo may wish
to sell farms wben they retire.
Barbara Kalluslty, city of ACton zoning administrator, commented that in evaluating appropriate rural uses, agriculture sbould
be more broadly defined, and ways to encourage people to stay in farming should be investigated. She said a 4-for-40 density
is a minimum. Land area alone does not insure operation of septic systems. ACton is concerned about the cost if septic
systems fail
WJ. Dufresne, Columbus Township, indicated he has farmed 190 acres in Columbus Township since 1946, on the border
with Lino Lalees. He cited conflictS between agricultural use and adjacent residential development. Dufresne said five acre
lots are too small to farm and too big to mow the lawn. The result is habitat for pests that destroy farm crops. The PCA
and the Health Department allow septic systems and wells on 2 112 acre lots and say they worle and are safe. With a 4-for-40
density, no one can afford to buy his farm wben be retires. People who move out in the rural area want amenities like paved
roads. Such assessments would be financially prohibitive if his farm could not be subdivided into smaller lots.
John Forrest, Dakota County Planning Dept., said that at the State of the Region event, housing studies were cited that
predicted a surplus of single family dwellings in the urban area. If these studies are correct, allowing more urban development
may not be prudent.
Bart Bartels, a realtor, was concerned about the effect of a 10 acre lot size limit on construction. He said that fI7 percent
of new homes are financed with FHA mortgages. FHA will no longer finance homes with less than 10 acres, and they will
not finance lots over 10 acres, which causes a problem.
Helen Baker, ACton, commented that in ACton's comprehensive plan they have adopted the Council density policies. ACton's
rural area is now under some pressure. She was disappointed that the Council has not carried out its policy. Rural density
is not just a sewer issue, but an issue related to the cost of all urban services. Rural residents do not believe that they alone
will pay the cost of repairing or replacing failed on-site systems or bringing in central sewer service. She cha1Jenged the
appropriateness of the Minnesota Municipal Board to allow adjacent communities to annex parts of rural communities such
as Lake E1mo.
,
d'Arcy Bosell, St. Francis, School District 15, stated th3t the school district has been concerned about inequalities of scbool
funding based on land values. She said that Aoob County has 48 percent wetlands and state and regionally owned land.
A 2 112 acre or 10 acre lot with a 3QO.foot frontage bas the same cost for transportation for tbe school district. Bo5ell said
2 112 acre lots would give more tax base. The district is building a new school and has planned for school facilities based on
2 112 acre lot sizes and the growth it would generate.
,~
Terry Forbord, Lundgren Bras. Construction, Wayzata, commented that the cost of land drives up the cost of bousing. The
small MUSA area has driven up bousing costs. A minimum 10 acre lot size would price certain buyers out of this marleet.
A 2 112 acre minimum lot size with performance standards for septic systems to protect the environment would be
appropriate. He said 4-for-40 is good for preserving prime ag land. He agreed with the Carver County clustering policy, since
it allows some bousing to a=mmodate the market, but also preserves ag land. High-amenity land in the MUSA has become
vety expensive. A 2 112 acre lot size may allow for high-amenity land in cities that do not have sucb property within their
MUSA
Metropolitan and Community Development Committee
Minutes of June 7, 1990
Page 6
Jim Piera, Anolca County realtor and builder, explained that he was involved in a project in East Bethel for which FHA has
denied financing because of Council policy. 1bis is causing economic hardship. Up to now, FHA has approved 'spot'
mortgages. Builders and home buyers were not informed about this new policy of FHA and it was not fair. A notice should
have been sent, with a target date for the 5lart of the new policy. Residential building is all that can be done in Anolca
County. If people want 2 112 acre lots and they are not available in the region they will go to Sherburne County.
Bart Bartels commented that he had found out about the change in FHA policy only when a rough-in inspection was
requested on a house and this caused inconvenience and financial hardship.
Ken Koplca, a mortgage banker, commented that two incomes are now needed to afford a new home. The land price
constitutes 25-30 percent of the total home cost, and that FHA financing is needed for bousing affordability. The core area
is not desirable. If prices in the outlying area become unreasonable, prices in the area in between will be inflated.
Written comments are attached.
The meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Karen PatraW, Secretary
Enclosures
tjpOOl33
llU90
Appendix A
C I T Y
OF
\
'0
liNO IM.lli
June 7, 1990
steve Keefe, chairperson
Twin cities Metropolitan Council
230 East 5th street
st. Paul, MN 55101
Dear Mr. Keefe:
I am writing at the direction of Harold Bisel, Mayor of the
city of Lino Lakes. Recently the mayor attended a meeting
where several elected officials from local units of
government in Anoka County e~ressed dissatisfaction with
Metro Council policies regard~ng development in unsewered
areas.
In particular there was a considerable amount of sentiment
for the creation of one and 2 1/2 acre lots. Please
understand that Lino Lakes wants nothing to do with this.
Several years ago the city approved SUbdivisions for single-
family development on large lots covering about 1200 acres.
It was a mistake. with the large lots the city is reguired
to ~rovide the usual city services including 5nowplow~ng,
pol~ce, fire, and parks to what is really a rural density.
The result has seen high property taxes, about the eighth
highest in the metropolitan area. .
And what of the residents who bought these idyllic pieces of
nature? Where sewer has become available most residents have
subdivided their lots retaining only normal city sized lots.
In other areas where sewer is not yet available homeowners
usually maintain and landscape about half an acre; the rest
grows up with quackgrass. It's not a pretty sight and it's a
voracious land user.
Lino Lakes is presently amending its comprehensive plan and
zoning ordinance to get rid of these large lot unsewered
subdivisions. Mayor Bisel and I hope that others will
benefit from our experience and forego this development.
It's best to wait for sewer.
Sincerely,
John Hiller
City Planner
ce: Bob Overby, Mary Hansen, steve Schwanke
\
'J
1189 MAIN STRE.F..T. LINO L'\KES. MI!'J:-iESOT^ 55014 612-464-6562
Appendix B
. CITY OF
EAST
r ~ETHEL
~ @ 0
CITY OF EAST BETHEL
2241 221st Ave. N.E.
East Bethel, Minnesota 55011
612-4J.4.9569
Fax No. 612-434.9576
June 8, 1990
Carl Ohrn
Metropolitan Council
Mears Park Centre
230 E Fifth st.
st. Paul, MN 55101
RE: Requested Changes In Policies for the Rural Service Area
Dear Metropolitan Council Members:
The City of East Bethel appreciates the opportunity to be
heard concerning the Metropolitan Development and Investment
Framework. East Bethel has been here previously before the
Met Council to resolve some of these same concerns back in
1981 when our Comprehensive Plan was being addressed and
again in 1986. In both cases, the City was requesting that
Met Council reconsider their plan for East Bethel and not
just designate our area as general rural use. Realizing Met
Council has been given the responsibility for planning for
the area, the City has attempted to work within the general
guidelines for moderate development of our area as provided
in our approved plan which allows residential developments
of 1 unit per 2 1/2 acres, and the development is orderly
and working well.
East Bethel'has a 48 square mile city and over 8000
residences. The City has provided for the services it needs
(thru city s~rvices or private enterprises as with garbage
hauling, sewer and well installations, etc.) and is not
asking Met Council to expand the MUSA line. Except for the
mobile home courts which have large collector systems,
businesses and residents (including the schools) have on
site sewers and wells, and with proper installations and
maintenance, there are very ,few problems. The City informs
the residences every year in their news letter about proper
care of their sewer systems, and codes for proper
installations are being strictly enforced. The City's
Zoning Ordinances provide for a 2 1/2 A. lot size with 1 A.
buildable so there is room to add additional systems if it
becomes necessary.
\
'-~ Other services such as police and fire protection, city
street construction and maintenance, building inspections,
etc. are covered by the city. Hwy. 65 is a major highway
running thru the length of the city and transportation is
Met council
Page 2
not a problem within our city. However, the city wants to
be included in Met Council's transportation planning and
Mayor Grams recently served on the Light Rail Transit
Advisory Board.
(
,
The City recognizes the need for Met council to plan for
orderly development but believes East Bethel has worked with
the council to attain that, and the city is asking Met
council to allow us to continue moderate growth both in
commercial and residential areas by utilizing our high
grounds along our major roadways for businesses and other
suitable areas for residential development. The soils in
East Bethel are not suited for agriculture and agriculture
is not a viable nor primary use in our area. However, there
is a substantial amount of low and wooded open land and the
University of Minnesota has a Natural History Preserve of 4
sq. acres. The City meets the average of one residence per
ten acres, but we need to be allowed the flexibility to
utilize our land to serve the people at higher densities,
smaller lot sizes, clustered developments. with the orderly
control of our local grovernment and ordinances, we believe
we can maintain the open areas people are looking for with
ample lot sizes, have adequate on-site sewers and wells and
provide services without being restricted to one residence
in ten acres. In order to serve our people with jobs, tax
base, etc., we need to have some commercial growth and small
clustered developments and believe we can determine the need
for services at the local level.
We are asking that the Development Framework will allow more
flexibility in our area so people may live and work here
where there is affordable housing and open spaces and have
FHA financing available where needed or wanted. The East
Bethel city council appreciates Met Council's consideration
for needed changes in the MDIF for our area.
Sincerely,
~~au4.~
Sherri Anderson
city clerk/Treasurer
CC: Ken Kutzman, Met Council Rep.Dist. 9
/
Appendix C
-
June 13, 1'3'30
- "'_0.---"-
. ... --..
~_~-.":r:
-'-) -..
Mr. Carl Ohrn
Metropolitan Council
Mears Park Centre
230 E. Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
Re: Examination of Metropolitan Council Policies for the
Rural Service Area
Dear Mr. Ohrn:
As chairman of the Afton Planning Commission, I would
like to comment on development policies of the Metropolitan
Council for the Rural Service Area.
The 1/10, 4/40 density is being enforced in Afton by
means of an overall density policy. Our residential zone
allows a maximum of 8 dwelling units per forty acres, and in
the agricultural zone, the density is 3/40. Land in the
Agricultural Preserve overl.y zone is limited to a density of
1/40. The Planning Commission reviews the density policy and
carefully considers the goals thereof each time a request for
rezoning or major development is put before it. I believe
the Planning Commission feels that these goals are worthy and
appropriate for Afton and other rural service communities,
and urges the Council to maintain the 1/10, 4/40 density for
the rural service area.
Reasons for maintaining the current density are many,
but high on the list is the preservation of the integrity of
the septic systems. Many developers will argue that septic
systems can be installed on small lots, and perhaps that is
true. However, there is ample evidence that eventually,
septic systems, no matter how well designed and constructed,
will fail. When failure occurs, they must be sited
elsewhere. If that is impossible because the lot is too
small to accommodate another system, central services become
necessary. The Metropolitan Council has said that services
will not be extended beyond the MUSA line, and that when
septic systems fail, the cost of correcting the problem will
be borne by individuals and local governmental units.
.
t
:
i
.
t:
,.
,)
City of Aflo" - 3033 St. Croix Trail So. Box 386: Afton. MN. 55001
. .
From Afton's perspective, it is prudent to take all possible
precautions to prevent such an occurrence. Our five acre
minimum lot size, with a requirement for two and one-half
contiguous buildable acres on each lot, insures that our
citizens will not have to face the expense of assessments for
central sewer service.
Another concern of Afton is tha~ of urban sprawl.
Naturally, land is cheaper for the developer the further away
he goes from the center of the city. The Planning Commission
feels that the Metropolitan Council's goal of staged growth
was a wise choice made several years ago. "Leapfrog"
development can only benefit the developers, and is, in the
long run, harmful to those who must struggle to provide
adequate roads, police and fire protection, schools, and
government.
Acceptable rural uses should be limited. Such uses
would include agricultural uses of any type, and low density
housing, as is now the case with the 1/10, 4/40 density. It
would be inappropriate for the Metropolitan Council to
encourage uses which are commercial in nature, or which would
hasten the need and demand for increased urban services.
The Metropolitan Council wields a great deal of power in
the decision making process. There is a need for low density
housing, just as there is a need for high density housing and
a full array of urban services. However, each of these needs
must be met in the appropriate location. The rural character
of areas such as Afton, Gran~ Township, and other areas in
eastern Washington County provides an immeasurable value to
the quality of life enjoyed not only by those who live in
those areas, but by Twin Cities area residents in general. We
ask that you consider this important intangible when you
consider policies regarding the rural service areas, and
support communities in their efforts to preserve a resource
which would be non-renewable if it were developed at a
higher density than guidelines now allow.
The Afton Planning Commission is currently reviewing
Afton's Comprehensive Plan and will continue to take an
interest in the Metropolitan Council's deliberation of the
rural service issues.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this matter.
/
Chair
Commission
m
REALTOR~
,~~ 1989-90 OFFICERS
Presldenl
Rila Cech
President Elecl
Jerry Boles
SecretaryfTreasur.r
Diane Smith
1989-90 DIRECTORS
Karen Boles
Juuy Kindseth
Patricia Moerke
Joyce Popkin
Roger Aoelol.
Oo"s Schulte
Melva ShonOlom
Jerry Smith
Gary Zimmerman
AFFiliATE DIRECTOR
Terri Aetshaw
REGIONAL VICE PRESIDENT
Carl YoungQuisl
M.A.R. DIRECTORS
Dean Gasser
RODen Koon.
,
I
14M ED lATE PAST PRESIDENT
Dennis Ewing
~XECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
BertyAnn D. Croteau
COMMITTEE CHAIRS
Patricia Moerke
Awards
Judy Helin
Bylaws
Sally Kuelher
CIMLS Exchange
Marie Bakke
Education
Floyd Hedgepalh
Equal Opportunity
AOOen Day
GoII
Dick Hinkle
Governmenta/ AHairs
Jeff Johnson
Grievanc.
Dan Slattery
MemOef3hip
Don Weeding
Muniple Usting SelVa
Gary Robenson
Personnel
Jim Perra
Professional StaMard.
Jud Lauzon
Public Relation.
,
1
Jeanne Gasser
SollOlarsllip
Oon Findell
Strategic Planning
Judy Klnd.eth
Patricia Moerke
roy. lor Joy
,)
..
"
Appendix D
ANOKA COUNTY ASSOCIATION of REALTORS'
11460 ROBINSON DRIVE NW, COON RAPIDS, MN 55433 (612) 757-7230, FAX (612) 757.7296
June 13, 1990
Ms. Mary Hauser, Chairperson
Land Use Committee
Metropolitan Council
Mears Park Centre
.230 E. Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
Dear Ms. Hauser:
RE: Public Hearing, June 7, 1990
Land Use...10 Acre Building Sites
We, as members of the Anoka County Association of REALTORS~
Governmental Affairs Committee, representing a membership of
1,038, were very appreciative of the opportunity to attend the
June 7, 1990 public hearing and being allowed to express our
concerns.
Keeping in mind that the population of Anoka County is 237,209 and
growing each day, we present the following concerns to you:
*Approximately 77~ of all mortgages are FHA financed.
*10 acres per building site will cause a shortage of land
and will drive the price up.
*It will eliminate most first time home buyers.
*It would cause a lower tax base which would affect
cities, municipalities, and school districts.
*It will put many people out of worK by Virtually stopping
new home construction.
*Proper land use is vital with representation from
different communities on the long range land use
cOllJllittee.
*It will have a great impact on costs of providing all
util ities.
A blanket land use polic~!does not fit every community or every
county, because of topography and soil types. Anoka County, as an
example, has many acres of natural habitat that cannot nor should
be used for building sites. We are also an area of very sandy
soil that tells you septic systems are used very successfully.
REALTOR- - I. a registered mart< which Identifies a prol...lonalln rea' ..'.ta who
subscribes to a strlc, Code of Ethic. .. . member 01 Ihe NATIONAL ASSOCtA TlON
OF REALTORS' .
Ms. Mary Hauser
Chairperson, Land Use Committee
Metropolitan Council
June 13, 1990
Page Two
In regards to preserving agriculture land we are limited with
regard to our agricultural base. On the other hand, Dakota,
Carver and Western Hennepin Counties should be treated differently
because of their excellent agriculture land.
Your timely considerations in addressing this concern, that is
causing many financing problems, would be greatly appreciated. We
also have several excellent members that would be willing to serve
on the land use committee. Their knowledge and input would be of
great value in serving the public as well as your committee.
In closing we reference you to the beginning of our comments. We
feel we need representation of all communities on the land use
committee to bring a better understanding of each individual
communities situation and the desires of the residents already
living there. Constituents at the grass roots level need to have
input as to how they are governed and land use policies are set.
Sincerely,
ANOKA COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS~
Governmental Affairs Committee
Richard Hinkle, Chairman
cc: Mr. Carl Ohrn, Staff
Council's Research & Long Range Planning Department
Appendix E
:J
.~- j;;2 - t?~
.Me-lrtJ _..--W-~C/.0.."-"" - _._m dm
______.________n_._ .u___ .____._ ..__.___ _ . ___ _ .____ "_n___ _.____ _._. __".__._________. ___._____________..___n
_ ___.___ ._. ...k __~t/~ _00_.2a6;l?f~~._ ._iC!.Y.J:tsd~_-.~----Ccf{/~r!' ~__rJ.'~~?J_.
.m.._..... ......._..J-.tv~'l/)w. /h m_h. ,.0:;/YY?/:P.~u.~_..CI'<?~i..-d(u..c'1e~,
._ ._.__.. . _.....w.lf?.. ideo.. ._.d"Jr?d-!..),~1i _,kav.~....<:2..~!:....rl(j'._q/.__.__
_n__' .U"" .__u.o.J-~ c-:5 _J: u/r.CY.LtJul: .._..Th!'cc__._ia0:"!~/z7"-._.:5o/~I:.t,;~~."-.L-
.. ',,_-""'_-' .....-.e2//I::Cll!..d. O-__.C{/):Ytjl-r~k::bs/~~_._.t.le(/e.l~~ -/-h~L
~. _..._n . , .. n__.JltJ'f h .)e1??~ ... c:2J?o- .. ,.4- fet-<- fo~n~k~ _ ;-~5/'cI~h-
" ...,. ,_" . ClIjla.-n/';?,nd. . tA, ... jz;uu5.k~ _)j1(c.-/~y _._Zo-:-_..f.eccf'-t.(.c.
! _' ..... _ .~a-Trf~re~~ .c.:;..,. ord~t-. .7er ~.d- _The-/~ . '.
_._'~;':: n, .... r.(q<:.l'~.L __& ._.1Ahq--t-._._t1a!':_~~8~~,,-:s-.ct:':LkJ n._.__'
_' __on - - ..... .- fZ//c:,,~l ""';fC;f><7Lj j~~ ~ct._& '-::~I</.~"----:;.--
_:.;.-.., ,._. . ,_ ..A-)l/ ft?/...~~b.7- -30CJ...~~7-.c:._._adJ,_-de ...__jh. ---
.. . ___ _ W _ ___kC:.2u/l;. __An _-,U"''' ",j,e'/m~ - m1i"'-,d;v- L7#'''~~S-
. _ .,.... _.__.._c..!us/~t-.htJuS/2? ..~.du a._u vC)/~ -k.e.h,_._. --..-,-----
~.: . -----.---.--....-~c ~"-&t!:--.kCf:.L---b.a~..5d_~ bf'
, ". :___,_.___. .:..*h<-.__._k~.!Y...5 4.../-/_$,C/L~~~ (., /S.d...r .s_......1~_n
, kL_~.j..~!..~_~__~b5:ic.~_hpt.?~~~-?l( lL...m{/Y7~y.
:,.:"--.----- z;fiib..l.flp_~.t4/tS/ ~#_aL_'a-c7~ C1! r~_fh_~_
".': . _A2.e-7/J~ ''--;;'; L ~"d? .
,". pt- '7,._~tl..L5J...L2..~ - ~e....-..L!!,.___
__ ~Ji&l-E-~ .
'.J ______&X-./.s=_&L:;!z.Jar~5 ~_.
! ___:..__.____~~~c:?J-1L~1JJt:n~_._SS-3-.~.2--.
,,)
I
I
I
!
II
\
,
I
I}-(-' 1
_,I:" ': ;: -~. '" ~ : ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !l ;1:1 ~t; ~
.." ..-
"J
>
o
.:.>
;z lu
I ... ;;
I ~) .:..
'"
> r.J
II- .
I~ ..
;(.)0
I :;-
'"
o
~.
'"
.....
'"
,
~
~]'
....e
2 ~
>;;3
~<
..-.,-
"
Q(,
W"
,- ,
IJ~ l
o(
(L ~
,
(
~
1
!
.li=t
c~
':. 1
~~ ~'~.
:> . ..
... .
'r
'0:'. {
* l~ ._~~,-.~ (.
x .
hJ ..,
j
f,
~
1
~
1
"I
J
~
~ .{
~;. ~ i
> .,
I)', ('01 ~
, :: ~
~~tt
C,; J
~~ r::..
~:::(t.
u. ~: a?
'l......~
..~ ""I'
QJ . I
.. .
- ,....
a
,-
>
G
I-
>: .
..
"
I
... 01
N
,.
,
.
.,
.,
'F>
.....
<
H
"'"
(,0 bJ LtJ
f-U
<H
:1:>
""
ow .....
z (I) ...~
< 0
o 2
"'w :>
'lIJ(() .0
~,,<C( U
.....X
Cl.U >
.:..ClC I-
::o=.t H
(/'10. U
o
..
-:r-; ~-~rn ;~~= -X r."~ ~-= ~ -~ ~-~'~~~_.~-:[ ~~'~l~-~ ; ;: j:' ;~
N
N
...0
....
01
OlO
00
lOa
..
10
....
o
'"
N
N
..... -0
o 010
o ...0
'" 0
'"
10
... 00
oI'l 00
co 00
N
oJ>
o 00
o 00
o 00
o 00
o 00
oJ> 00
oI'l '"
o ,.
....
......
. <
.H
_.1::(.1
<olW
.... I- e
U<
H:I:
>
0<0
WZ
<ol<
-'
<
I-
o
f-
NO
'"
00
00
10 0
'"
oJ>
N
00
00
,,0
..
....
00
00
100
.,.,
...
o
o
o
..
"
W
f-
I-
W
.....
'F>
~
'"
2
010
'"
oJ>
';)00
00
0"
..
,..
.;:'0
C\ CI
010
...
,.,
00
00
,'.
00
.~ 0
o
00
.....
<
I-
o
I-
00
00
....
00
00
00
o
N
..
',i
'H
,~
'"
.", ..
...... I
.<C( ,.)
.....
.0::" .j
v, w Z
wf- <
U<
H ~ I))
> 'w
",0 U
W Z (J H
(,0) < >
"
.u
f.r,
o
o
oI'l
00
'"
'"
....
o
o
o
00
00
00
o
o
00
00
00
o
o
o
00
00
o
00
00
00
o
o
'"
00
<>
,',
....
.,
....
. "
"Ul
wO
I>
,. ...
O~
'J'
W
U
....
>
U
w
<ol
'"
Z -.J (..
o c( 1-
M Z'
f-O
U'"
woe
.....w
we.. t
-'
<
l-
.:'
I-
o
..
..
'0-
"'-"-1lI Cl ,.;-.
0=' =-o'=: =-(-.-=- :.,~."
~. :J.....;.!!. .. t. .!! 'j .. ..
0" ,.,-
..
" "
-,---
,_ '" . tJ
00
00
00
'"
..,
'"
L'
"
..
:x:
U
(,0., CI
w2
0<
H
> ...
oew
hJ (J
".H
>
C. IX ( (()
Ww Z
fl, v, 0
.. ....
X" t-
uw U
UICLU
=. I- ...J
Co. 0 ( bJ
, .1 ....
,.. ... ..
-,-
o
o
o
on
..
ex>
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
on
..
ex>
-'
..
I-
o
f-
,_ IU .~
" " "
,'" ,-
"''''
"''''
0'"
ON
0_
"'01
....'"
0'>>
0....
"'ex>
..'"
"''''
<>>
'"
-oil
"'on
.,.,'"
"'...
0_
....
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
..
'"
0>0
10 '"
01-
0'"
o
...,
.-,
...
'H
.""
", w
wf-~
CJ <
...."
>
oeo
WZ"
", <
...
w
e~
"
..
:x:
o
-'<ol
-< lU (I
21<
- 0-'
41. .:..
"Cl.
, w:>
.:&. Iff
.:>0
'"
DoI'l
0....
10 0.
('-,m,
10 - ,
"'..
<>>10
"'-
...0
00
00
00
00
DO
00
00
0'"
..
o
. "
z
o
H
f-
<
'"
I-
"' "
H
Z~
H
:>:
o
<.
"
.....
..
....
eJ
:z.
<"
z'
....
...
0':
<olW
WlJl
......
-'X
Cl.U
~ I~
::.::.
on",
o
M
'"
..
" "
. . .
,,-
" :j ~ ~~~.~ '!
f')- --()-
.. ..
"'..
,.,
o
o
o
o
u>
'"
....
.,.,
o
o
o
o
0'
0>
"'
o
<>
o
Co
'"
....
(0
<>
n
n
o
o
""
C>
"'
..
o
'"
z
.0
.H
.f-
.""
..:r:
.1-
...,
.....
.z
> ....
..:I:
_JO
1-4
-'
0.....
..
...JH
.,;(u
I-Z
....<
"'z
"H
uu.
(!) (,
ZZ
HI<
~. f-
H....
01-:-..
=.
..""
_J
..
I-
o
I-
<> _J
.. ""
u'.o to.
o
_1 1-
:~ rl "
....,
'""'
,
..
,
I
)
,
i
I
I
,)
,- I
1
I
\
," I.." ,. _I~ ~= ~ ~_~~,~ ~:!! ~;: ijff~;r. ~-~-~I~~:-~'fB-!E:!i;~-~ ~ ~'; ~ ~ ~ ~; 9 ;I;'~;' ~:I~~; ~ '1 ~~; ~;g~~; ~ (; ~ ~l;~;
!
"'4
LJ
>
o
c;.
Z l..w
<( (~I
..
h. .:.
o
<0
>-0
....
'-t...;l
,-,0
>
,
.."
o
,.,
...,
"
L'
~
"
o}. 1-$
...~ 'j
:: J'"
-,.
V
:>0>
(.'1 (1~
'1
~. ~
(.;:1.
',- l
l.. ~
Co .~
~~ 1'-'
~ -
hJ ;J.
..J
"1'
"
'r
,'!
::r
,.
'It
! ~
j P,
I ,f I:)
i :.: "_ . [
1(.)...... .
I ~: ;-~ :'
I.... J
u 'l
;-
., '::0'
I :;0 01 C,
I I ~ .....
,(""1
\ :.: ~ ~.\
".
I . I
:.l
l
'!' d
2
....e
L
,.
....
;:
~,.
'L
Ol}
WU
>, L
('-,e
OC
.:.
o
....~
>-
I- "
~;;
,'. 'J
11'('
I.-lo
'.I,e
0(-
I), U
'J
~" OJ
.::: ...
~'1';
..
j
I.]
R
,
::1
g
J
"
"'0
N
<00
<DO
"'4
-4
-<I>
OQ)
0>
N
40
-0
00
4
....
'"
0>
<1>0
".0
-0
...
'"
'"
0>
00
00
00
00
00
....."
r-4
"'..
Q)<I>
'" Q)
Q)
...
u
. .,
.w
-c!t
.",
.<t
. X
'U
(f')O
W2. :.l
U<t 0
.... H
>(1) ..-
"W U
WU ....
CIlH ...
> 0
0" ~
ww u.
.,"'-
<C L'
XU U
U l.iJ ~ H
"7. _J
~... 0
Q. c:> I .:..
o
o
N
4
..
'"
'"
4
N
'"
fa
Q)
0>
N
..
'"
Q)
....
....
'"
0>
<I>
.....
o
....
'"
Ii>
O.
o
o
o
o
o
, , ,
NrrlC" ty,OO
'"'"
'"
<l>r-
Q)r-
...'"
o
-~
<I>
".
.T.
...I
<C
I'
o
....
I
<ON ~(D
Q)U')C'>.;I""
Q)-,
0....
NO)
0-'
<1>'"
M'"
It)-'
<1><1>
Q) ".
It)-
-' "'.
"'Q)
It)r-"
'"
00
oc;,
..,0
00
...1'1'.
~ lH c..
ZH
0-'.
lI: ,,,., LI. C
0( 171 "
ll.' =.
c.. V, c
00
':>0
00
00
00
oor
00
C.
1,(. c;
'1"
'"
I'
'"
.(fi .c(
..J I
<C L'
..
-'" (" 0
(0) W Z
w..- -c(
U<C
...."
>
<'<0
"J 2
L' <t
'"'"
0<1>
0) w..:
"
o
o
Or-
N-
0::.0
",
"
00
qoo
I
,'-, c. c
_:;'0.-
00
00
,.
r-
... 0'
...-'
"'...
"'-
c
.~ ,... .;;
0...
CO <D
""
.....
CIJ
-4 UI f' ..;J -
oor r--,....
~tt'l,' CD
..=, ~,' C'
('I_J (.
.....Ii>
o Q)
r-
"'
'"
<I>
oU') OQ'l
OC'I' 0('1
"
"
C
"
,~'.
:..:
t~
..... I" e-
II .....w
t-U
--, t-i
::t:: > ,~
....
>-....
<C lJ
...I....
....>
::-.. a:
0....
'"
-.
<t L'
....=>
....U
u. f....l
"''''
UQ.o
0- oU>
"' <I>
~, -'
<>>
00 00
00 00
oae 00
c,
V, hJ
"1(....
W~"<C
~ --'I
U" (, () h
(j) - (, ..... )
W to =-::. t--
Ul. If, ,", C
o
...
N
'"
-'
<>
It)
...
00 00
00 c.Q
"'
VI
'"
0)0<:0,'1
-,,,, 0>
-,It) -'
00 _
"
"
0.
....
.... .,
C) ,~.,
lA.'w.
"-U
6",'--1
" >
1'-' ~.::
....
....'1'.
>
,--I";
I- <C"
(J Z 1-
....0
... "., U
CoUll
(( u.1
(, .:.
<IlO
W-.p
U4
....
>'"
"'....
wu
lI)H
> -
0.:.::
W"J
l.f)(J)
<C
X .'C
U W.
01. J: .~
~..'
"-01,
...I
<C
I-
o
....
o
o
-'
'"
...
,.. . . 0'-:":"';
r - -n-' -.("\-
~'-~"-~ ~..~'~ III :: !!
("\- --,-.,- --r-
~ n--~ ~f.~ ~ :~ "I ... ;; ~ ~ .:
'1- _.~. I"'!- -r-
01... ,. .,
~!!_~_~''l
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, ,
<1>'"
q, ,..-.
'"
,
ON
001>
...
r-N
It)
OCIJ
04
',11
."
.(!.
. oX
<t
"
U
..
l/)
l)
.>>
0>
'"
:5
....
l-
. LI
w
.:.
u)
'1'. _
=> ....
o
".....
2>
<tH
-'....
-MU
w....
UI-
'1'>0
.... oX
::>:.:.
...I
'"
I-
o
....
.}"::-",
:! -,,:,'!
" . .
. . .
..,.,-
W
'J)O
:2::2: to
w'"
u.
w,,"t.
(;) W f.'
H
...J...I
H.:&..(
>"-
H=>
U'"
o
o
'"
'"
...
o
00
o
o
o
<I>
....
00
00
00
o
M
o
o
o
00
00
00
o
o
o
00
00
0':>
o
o
00
00.
o
00'::
"
o
OOL
00
o
<I>
"
00
c;, ~
'" "
",
h'
e,
'"
<C
X
U
."
...I
<(
....
Ut. I.)
~:' ~
....
::>:
"'>-
....<C"
'.J ~ V
........
>=-
,'.:, OL<
....
(I, -A
<t
0:..:1--
....H
J,:Ct.-
1,- ~ I
OUe..
-"~a
'!-b-':!'"
<OCIJ
C'IN
00
0",
(11 0)
fY". 0)
c;,Ol
ClJr-
o Co
C) C. 0
4~g
(t. (,.)
c.:,v>
O. '"
"
"
I
C
I
o
o
...
".
-'
..Lo,
H
".
r-
N
'J>
'"
.J>
~,
00
001>
0;
".
0,"
"''''
CoO
o
",
(.1......
l'
C' 0
00
,;)
.)
00
r-
ID
-'
C[)
o
c.o
<>
..:..
c:.
'"
00
I.I~'
,-
.r,
....
U
....
> .J
('( 0
w.:<
'1'.....
t:t t.
....U
(.j
<{-,
:r. 4-
U:;.
"'....
::O~
"- d
".
>-
<!
:';l.i"
:r h'
I" C,
HI,-l
-.- >
,...
C.I.,
c: <.0"
'"
..
I.., ..;(
,-
lu C,
10':""
U{ ..
I- l.'
I~... ..~
...I
...
,-
o
"
o
o
.....
...
~1 ~~ I .,
i' ..
'\
I
)
,
,
}
it
,J.~.: ;.-:T..~~_~ ~;i_~ ~_~'~J: ~i]_; ~ ~"hrn~~~f~~/~ ~[~'i~'!. ~'~.:
L~
I'"
>
! ~~~
:.! h'
.{ (~J
<(
<eLl.
o
I O~
I~~
IJ .:-.
>
I ,
I ,.'
.:.
I ~
(
~
I
:C
~?
.J
o.!..Q
I' ~~ J
':'i
I ~4
I ""
II,n
~
r:.
Q
:.r
~r
~
J
I ]
\ J.
I !
I ~ "' .r
~;d
. ~ .. -<t
~";.tt.
~,: :to
eJ, Co .1
:.:! ". 't
\ ~'~: ;"
I ~~~i11;
\ ..,
I
<.
]"
'i
~(
"
..
.(
>'
Itl t.
C,
":,,l..o
\.1 j~
,- "
I,'"
01:
u.
n'
lU')
t- l>
:~; :j'
u.
L
Co
,- .
~ ,.
I- r
Co
<t
.' 1.1 '" G .
"''-''.'
"
..
c,
0,
~
B
...
o
oj
00 .0
00 0
-',
" ... 0 10
... t". c.
II) 0' ,Yl
&I) 0) ...
'" ...
o
.",
.w
. I~
.",
. <(
.:J:
'U ,,',
>
VI Co ..:(
lu :.z: :J:
u<( x
H C>
>"" H
"'w :J:
wu
(I).... C.
>. Z
0" <t
.u w
UJ (.!l (,0',
<( ,-
x"' h.l
OWt W
0::).: U
=- t. I
~ 0 (.t"..
<T,
>1
<(
:>
:c
<0
,.,
X
o
~
"
'fo'
I.. ..
w.
WI:
.x ..
to. ~
lfol..o
0::>
o
...
...
e : ~ :?~-:!-~ G ~ .
.....-- -,..,- "r'-
~
...
...
oj)
...
0>
'"
~
...
...
o
o
o
....
<(
>-
o
>-
I
o ,
...'"
"'-
...0
'"
0>-
_ 0>
......
"''''
"''''
...0
... .,
_0>
0>0
"'...
...0>
"'<0
....,
"'
...
"'-
"'0
<00
0<0
N<O
00
00
00
':>0
00
00
00
00
00
(',
'"
_0<-
Il> .,
...
Of<
W
,~
....
.(.1)
. .'
. <(
.H
. tX (0 Co
(,0', lu Z
w>- <(
u<(
H'"
>
"":>
wzo
.. (J",.ol{
..
X
I~
'f< >
0..0 <(
0_1 U
H>-C
>::.
"'0
w
(fI.4
<t
..>-
WH
Xu.
, ""
ou(.'
-' <T'
<( wo
ZH
0-'
<lICI.. C
"'..
W =. :
(,. .:.. (/I.::
. "
"
ur
f'f !! ~ ._~ :J ~ ~
'"' - -"""'..
ID .:>
...
("OX>
<0"'
... tl)(t"ll
."0<<= 00>
.....aco.....
(1)0 00)
... 0
f;-. ())
.;0
00
0'"
0'"
o -
00>>
0>
0>
00
.:.0
00
00
00
00
.-..)0
C) 0
'" 0>
-'"
0> ,..
< '"
'"
{...
-,
<(
"
~: ~~:
(<
VI . I-j W 1_
~i:~,~~'
0, 1.01 1,1)
H<(
'" -':J:
l1t (.t U. U
o. t::...:.;
I- =. _:. t
Ih C 'l,';' C
o
'"
...
...
,! ~ g ;;;_.~ ::; ;
,-.'- -'r-.'
I
o
o
I
I
I
I
I
o
. I
0>>00>
~
o
.1
co
'"
...
'"
co
N
'"
'"
o
o
co
'"
o
o
o
o
00
00
o
o
00>
...
'"
o
o
~
,..
N
>
<(
-' <T'
1-'"
:>w
0;"
W
-' 0'
<(
>-:F
H'"
..0
<(l-
I..) I.fI
'.t,
".
OJ
I!) H (.'1
2> z
H~ H
)- W ....
I'ob'" :x:
L'l I~
~ H
-' -'
>-
c,
.j
<(
I-
o
I-
o
<0
...
.;
" .
" "
~-
"''''
...'"
...
<0
'"
'"
<>
<0",
...'"
...
"'...
...0>
0<0
0-
...
...
...'"
"'...
...
-'"
<0'"
...-
...
....'"
o
o
0>
'"
<>
.......
oj, '"
"' CO
"'-
co<O
o
o
o
00
00
00
o
o
00
0'"
o
o
"'
- "'
o u,
U'l u)
...
.",
..j
. <(
'H
- ..:It: c.. Cl
C,l W Z
w)-L.c(
0<
H:F
>
(. "0
wzo
( (.t.,.q:
>-
W
W
'"
I-
0',
-'
<(
>-
o
>-
. "
" " "
_u~...
q--~~ g
00
00
000
a,
'"
00
00
00
00
00
<T'
W
co
'"
<(
:J:
U
v.>
UJ<(
U.... 0
HI-
>:=Ot
0<:0
w
l.J',..J
<(
L'"t....U
W"ilJ
J: ,.. I
I- 41-
OU'-'
.
.
-
""'
a
- '"
L
00
00
,:> c-
oo
00
...
'"
<T, "
~ -
...
Z
I!)(.
H
0' 0
CJ -D
hi .LtJ
..1') __.1
.j ,
HI oH
(Jl -(I)
, > 0
,)", ...:( v',
1-- I ~ t-
I l.J t- :r:
C) =- (!l
H OH
.j -'
" -,
t- 4 t.
W 1- w
U,.II HW
,x Lt. ~
1- ..:( 1-
V,I."" Ul.J-'
o
OX>
...
...
U(_
H>
...
...
<(
"
I-
o
0>
c"
... ,
00 n ...
'I" U ".. II>
.....
'"
.~
"
a,
o
'"
'"
'"
....
'"
"'
o
...
,--,
"~
,.,
~)
Of)
'"
oJ)
"
.'.
lb
.;
Co
c'
.:.
o
CI
'"
'"
-'
t::v
,..
.:.
0:.
;;,
H ,~..
t- Ld
4(4)
W"
"'>
I.),.
li.Jlo..
C! vi
f") _I
.. <t
<(2
o
:x ')"1
LJt Ii'
<( ....'
.....
~
<(
t-
O
,-
c.
C,
"
or,
"
" .
.' I~:.
....
,
'\
~
" jl
\
. ..
'.. oJ " . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~..~ ~=-.t!; ;]_~.; ; ~ ~-# ~- ~ ~~ ~~!.~-? ~-.; ;~~ !._~.:~-; t~ ~_ ~ t~; _;.'~-~f~ 1; ~-; -~ ~_~_; ~- ~ ~ ~; ;;'~ ~ i
U \i)
,.,
>
o
(',
::.!.w
<l <.
1\0:
>0
,.- .
..4
! (.1 :;
I '
I ~
I ~
-'
t..::.
J
~
lilt:)
.;: ~
';. ...],
"
.." '-I
(7,~
t rt
~..-t
.,..<:)
"~ I
,-,-.i
(~ "l
n
W~.
~
g
:!
1
",
:Ji
~l
l'
I
.l
'I
I :1'
"
! t-
'>' I
i ~:>.~ "
I> ..
;.,',4"-1_'
\ ., :. ~'
...... ,~
;:;~1
[~1~
"'"
n .....
.~ f/:)
'" .
.f, '" . .... .
r ..
~l
(,
Z h
~(
Z
.,
<(
:1
"' (
oX
1....4)
WU
1- "
,.,',t
O(
0.
o
I-
>~
1- c'
0:'
oJ; ,
C. (.
ILl U
" .
U', ~~
2~
o
,..
:1 .
,.
~I}
j
:l' ,
.'
"
~
(
" . .
n-
.....
i5
H
I-
<(
w
oX
IJ
w
oX
o
o
N
oil
4
2-:-~- ~-:-~
'(I -0
oil'"
oil'"
.",
'W
. C,
.",
U .<(
.J:
'U
00
"''''
~'"
"''''
4~
oil~
"'4
oil(,<
"''''
0(0(\00
~C1>
-'"
M'"
O<'tl"OO
COlJ) CO
4(J) 00,
"'4
oil
00 00
00 00,
00 CO
00 0 c.~
CO 00
-I1))l,f.
Ul Ul
CX>'"
NU>
"'0
Wz
U<(
"1
>'"
oXW
WU
"'H
>
0'"
wW
"''''
<(
roc:
uw
"'J:
=-1-
0.0
U)
I-
:0:
u',
u'
<(
14)',
W:=Ot.
uO
HW
>2
",<(c
w -'
<<il -J
W
I-IJ
cU v,
w.,
0:>:
'"
00
OC'
00
c.o
00
O-J
(h'"_ c:.
4 VI
00
0'='
C"
0-
lO.
4
'"
C'
..,
o
oX
I-
Z
0..
U
o
W
W
:>
Of,
-'
<(
"1
((; t., C
ww
I-U
<(0<
:1 > IJ
oc:
owe
24.0"'
<l
o
V.W
tLl l,.o) 1.1
.,<(
.J:J: a
~O
La UI.
=. =. t-
ff. .::~
('<
o
'"
4
~ ~--~. ~-~--~ ~~
",Y' --0"
"'''' ~
4 '"
CDC'
(,
lD
4
,
00
00
, ,
C"
U>
U>
o
~
00
44
oil
-J
Ul<'
40f
'"
"' a"'
o mO)
oil 4
M
....
"' 00
tTl<'OO
~ OUl
co c ,...
o 00
o 00
.'.
ocoo
o 00
0<.:00
4
._ of
Go.
OUl en
o,...lJ:t..n
Ul 0
lO
J
.0
.OX
- l-
. Z
.0
'U
of
. 'rl
.w
-C!>
.",
.<(
.r
-U
"'0
Wz
U<(
H
> fh >
oc:w
WU
u) I-<
>
00:: C (!:I
ww Z
CfI V) H
<( -'
:I: 01:: ~)
~) OJ to- >
U(.::I: Co U
=- t- bl
Q. 0 t. I..~
U;
W
lJ
,~
>
..,
W
U)
>0
<(w
-,W
1-:>
=-
00
Z
-'<l
<(
...en
Hw
o.w
<(",
UI-
co
2...J (i
H<(
._IZ
C.IOo
> U)
00.:.
l~1 W =
.:..:- LA. 'F
-'
<(
I-
o
...
o
-J
"'
...
01-'-'0
'. "
ry'
- " "
" " "
C....
010
'"
('<0
00
oil 0
mo
~4
oil
'"
C"
G,
"'0
mo
0'"
aU>
00l
~
'"
CD
~
mo
....
o
'"
oil
of,
of,
('<0
U>o
0'"
00'
~
'"
Ol
'" 0
m
('<
0"'
m
N
o
o
o
or:..
o c.
00
00
00
00
o
c.
00
OOl.
00
00
o Ul
"'~
o
U .n
.no
~ 0"
M 4'
-'
<(
I-
o
I-
-''''
<(Lillo
2"1
0-'.
(fJ Q. C
". a.
L W =.
LI. V,
~
'"
m
"'
en
v,
W
c>
'"
<(
r
UI-
z
o u,
z:o:
oJ;...
o
"'-'
WW
lJ>
HW
>0
""
WU
"'I-<
:0:
oXO
wZ
J:O
I-IJ
Ow
-'
<(
I-
o
I-
"'
o
....
.
'"
.n
~
oil
~
oil
4
01
"'
0)
"'
o
'"
CD
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
'"
.....
.....
-J
00
WW
...1-
<(<(
CJ IJ
00
-' -'
-' -'
<(<(
ZZ
=-=-
0-'
0<(
('<I-
<>>0
41-
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
<:>
<:>
o
o
o
o
(1'1 (,;
1-1-
lJlJ
ww
...,...,
00
"''''
0....
1-...
Z Z
ww
:0::>:
ww
>>
00
"''''
0.0.
:0::>:
HI-<
0-'
.n<(
('<I-
mO
41-
...
.,
'"
,
~
4
o
....
.'
"'
~
4
o
'"
G,
'"
....
0)
"'
~
.n
o
o
o
0>
o
o
'"
'"
if, 0.'
ww
(j) (h
=-=-
(~ C!l
ZZ
1-<1-<
UU
Z Z
<(<(
ZZ
H....
U. U.
"'"
ww
J:r
......
00
0-'
0<(
MI-
alO
41-
.. ., '" ... .. D
!L_!!..!!_ !!.-.~~
n-_-N I') '~-n ~~~ -: .
;!..;.,-'" .!-1"''-~ _u0-- .; ':
G,
'"
0)
c'
o
'"
0;,
o
'"
4
'"
'"
'"
'"
m
'"
o
<D
"
o
~
c.
M
o
'"
o
o
o
.",
o
.....
C"
1:..,
'"
'"
<:>
'"
c.
z
=.
u.
-'
<(
Lr. C
W
Z
h.
L"J C
-'
<(
...
o
I-
" f'I ..
01 "' '!'
"")
..I.,
, " 'I
\
\
I
I
,
i
"
"1
J
~
....
~
J
~
~
I
Cl
"1
J
"
"
(.
(.
L
"
c
" ,
.....,
I
I.
.~)
I
I
i
I
'.
I
I
I
I
I
,
.
I
)
r
I p": t., '0 ("":", " .; c::-. ------z':-(\ ~ 1 f) ~.) -,---
(~... ':-g; ~ ~~~Tf"~~..~ ~;1.1f~ ~; ;.~~~-~:~ff~Tr. ~'jnr;nr~TD H~1i';n;: ~ :ff~ ..a; rnHf~ ~;~" I';
I
I
I
I
!
I~
I~
10
(:.
...... h'
..a: .:",
..
l. '"1
'~I
ID
>- ,:>
I'
0<'"
() oJ
. >
,
'"
o
'"
U'
...J
.,
;
1
i
'l'Ji
.~ 1
",.1
:~, ~J>)
..
:;
(,
'" ~
~, J"'"
"
j
I)
:1
J.
ij
I
I
I
I
q
,
.~
J
~.
..
:J;
I~
s
>:
~...:! '-(
U', ,=. '1
>- ..
IJ-,.... ..,'
.(....
., .. :'I
..;( (11 ~I
H '~
U 'I
~ I::' t_).
Z 0"-/
H' I
lL 0\.....
H ~'i'
(.,...... ~.
,0< ID'I'
u. _,
.. ,
."
u
'I
" d'
Z
H'
~~
..;: .J
~ ~1
r.
...
:.'~' .J
.;'~
",;:1
....
>-
....
e>
..;:
o
w
I.
Ib
o
0>. ~j
0;:1
.... ~
>:
,-
c.
..;:
,...
00
00
00
....0
<1'10
00
0>0
ID'"
0>
l'
,
,.j
:i
;j
J
~i
.,
..
,.
..
..,
':1
::1
d
.c
,
,
,
,
,
,
o
,
I
I
,
,
.
I
.
,
,
,
,
.
o
,
,
,
,
I
o
o
,
I
I
,
,
,
I
,--
I
I
I
I
I ,
<1'10
'"
00
Of=-
00
0'::0
<1'10
<-'0
"''''
<1'1-
'"
<1'1'"
00>
0,...
0';.'
0":'
00
0<1'1
00
UlO-lDo)
.... <I'IID
,... "'-
0....
<1'1
....
00
00
00
00
00
00
0<1'1
00>
0>0
DO>
0....
00
00
0....
<1'1
'"
<1'10
<.
'"
00
00
"'0
<1'10
00
00
00
00
00
'" -
00
00
00
00
,... -
<DO
ID '"
0>
00
o
o
<1'1
'"
00
00
00
00
00
00
oo~oo
00 00
lI) '"'" .:. t\'l
00
00
00
o
o
'"
'"
"''''
<1'10
00
'"
r" ,"
0>0
"''''
0> -"~"
'F.
..,
X
"'<
W....
X
..;::f
....w
'"
x 0(.0
W ...J
rL-<~
0>
...J
";:0
>..;:
1/',11"'
W....
X>:
<....
......
o
>:0>.
WO.C
"'<
o
...JW
<...J
><
.r. .
lL
o
>-
U
z
<l
.:>.
=.
u
u
o
(!J C
Z (!).
....Z
.:,....
~....
....<
=. 'u
(()J:
"'C1
::E. Z i" 10.1
UJH :J:
.... CL to.,
en ~ (,0",
>-=>
.r. CL
,.
"''''
I
I
I
I
o
,
I
I
I
. ,
00
00
00
L'l
'"
00
00
0'"
or.
....
....
.,
CL '.
If) 'n
z
....C1
0..."1 C
...J .'
"'...."
",,,,,
"''''
"''''
"''''
"'00
,.....-
- '"
'"
o c.
00
00
0"'"100
,"f\m.... 0
..;t v .-
"'.
o Co C':)':;"
OOCQO
0<1'1"
"'''''
<I'IC
00
o c.
o c.
00
00
00
00
<,'
0....
0'"
oocoo
00 00
00
00
", '"
'"
00
00
.:>0
00
", '"
'"
'u
.,
:=>
':>0
00
o
ID
'"
<-I
0....
....
0'
.n If).." Co 0
c:, .
<-
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00 00
~~~~::
o 0
o -
() a
00
"''''
00
00
"''''
(".,!J
." 0
....'"
- (I)
00
00
00
00
", 0"
0- -'-...
,....
~.~-..) = : ~ ~
- ---~--
-:f-::: ~-~--~ ~ :t ~ ~--;~ ~ -:(~- -1 ~ f f"o !~ .f
,--- -- -(~,... _._"""\- ..-_--. -.. - - _, ""'"'l
.,
.' '.,
""'
'""
"'00
"'-
- '"
00-00
00 00
oocoa
00 00
00
00<
00.
.~l .j
.... '"
..... u.
00
00
""0
'" 00
,'I r-
.' '"
('t.... (; ('I
("of ("I U)
c.
....
<
....
H
o
wI.
L-:..:rt-
Ht.)
<
.,
.... <0<
ZH
,..,u.
<
:t'
o
ox
....<
<....
...."
z..;:
w O'
~ 0"'"
z z
..<
w
> 0(./"
0<-
(.!) UJ (J
....
-' v, _
<l .,
O~
00
...JJ:O
- '"
00
"''''
,'".MP"
"''''..
n
J:~ ;.'.J~ e : ~ " :! ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ 21 N ~ ~ ~ n = ffa-~ ~-~
I ' . - ....... ...m...___ .'. --. .
(:-) ,--., t "
_.!~~ ~~ ! ., q ~ !_;~_;'t~.; ~~;
'-J/. ('I
)
W
>
o
c.
12 hJ
I <C{~
I ~ u.
10
II >- ~
1-- .
H4
00
>
, '
,.
I.'
01
I
(~ j
z t.,
Hq
~ "-
H ..,
~ ut
~l
;~ J
Oc
,. ~
~ ? 'I
l ' \,
q
.,
J U
. ..;
~i co 'I
."
:c ~..., I
~.~ C, j.
l .~ I.~
~-) I:' ::i
~. ~ I--~.
::J ~;
,~~l ..;
";\
,~
r ci
o.!.' ...., li~
q ,-,)
~', 1-'
~.~, ~
ll'.f ...., Lt'
,~ .J j
(J~ v1
~ J
D
,,]
n
..,
~:J
o
d
o
,"
""
-.
~o
,
n
q
II
if
'I
'1
'I
..,
:r.
~.H i
,. 4
I~'. t~ .
>- ..
(,.,.... -r
u", '-11
4. ;.: ~
,... I...:
() I.'}
"' ,I
q ,", 10;.
L. a. ()
I ~~~
\~:;;; ~
({; -r
. ".,,1,
--
i":
,~ . CIl 0
r.....
o
,
I
I
,
,
,
I
I ,
" .
I I 'II
(OO)~oo
C ('l\ 0) m
'"
o
o
o
o
'"
I
00
00
<00
., 0
""0
..,
~
00
"''''
-4
'"
...
o 00
0'-00
40
-0
40
'"
'"
0600
, - '"
-..
...
00
00
.....0 00
~10(_OO
00
,.,'"
..
...0
'"
4
'"
00
00
00
o
...
00
00
o
o
o
o
'"
00
o
...
'"
Q
~
'"
o
o
o
o
'"
00
00
00
00
00
o
...
00
o
.0
......
.~.
"
2
....
o
2\
g
....
:>
....
co
o
o
...
...
...
~-:t UlW
mM f'I"'Iffl
00
0';:'
"'0
'"
QOUlOO
00 Lt)O
au (,00
0'
00
00
00
..
00
00
00
"'0
C'::'
00
fT, CL
'"
'"
00 .;:'0
00\ '_\ ('I
00
00 ('1"10
C'O
C '"
00
>-
'"
...J>-
WI'
02
.::0
>0
...0
2:
:>.
<:>
'j >-
...
>...J
"'..
2
w'
....a.
....
0..
o
...
'<1',
<J)W
...'"
:>CW.
u') t- ..
., "
..;....
."
J
..;
:t
>-
...
....
o
2
..;
:t <1'.
..."
0"
"'H
LLI t-
:r. -.
...'"
0....
"
J- )-
:z. 2 r
LU C, C
.:r:c...
...",
00
<D<D
......
00
"'...
NC'IC'-
<0'"
......
I"
~..:!-~ :!-~-~. n f'( !!.~_~ ~
--,..- --,...."- -,.... -
0:,
2:
IJ"' (J", =.
..... 'J C"J U.
~ t z
Il' ) =,1-
1: I."L 1.1. '1"1
Ul u...... ~
(,-, w ~ IX I
I\: I~ UJ t-
.:' r
it': .:... 1-"
~w Oz
1-1.." .... .
lJ) =- I ~ ~
l.~ fJ 00
1- .:.:: <(
OJ: I u.
2" (!)
.c( 1-11
.J'
'h
0)- ...
Z 1,.1
C:;~
.... i.t
hI I'
Ll: .....:
..:...',(J
..... .T1Q
C
M.w 00
U) ..... (' 00
'"
,..
"
....
>:
'"
H
::.
o
w
~-.-,.. Q
~~~ ~
,-..0.)')('0,...
I".:l . (W')
('If' "
u. ~
C'll'"
C'tu('
<D c.
00'"
'....'Il)
,_......., 00
".~
(.;)
00
00
00
00
_ 0
'" o'
"'..
'-' t:J,
00
o .~
00
" 0
'"
(', .-J
00 0
00 0
':lO 0
o 0
o 0
'"
...
<0
00
00
00 0
00 0
0'"
...
00 0
o 0
o 0
'"
...
<0
00
00
00 0
00 0
O~
...
00 0
o 0
o 0
'"
m
<D
oJ
"'''
'::0
- ....
0-
<DO
N.;!
<0 .-
M. fO'
...."
HH
t-....
~~ U)
ooe::.
"''' 0
LLLLl W
:z.
..
...J
....
W
OJ
<1'.
H
:>:
'" "
~W
.. ....
f)" 0) ,
2 .
....
'" ....
t-'"
<O~
00 0
(', ('I U)
0) (II CJ)
"'"l..., ( m
. n
" n
,......
:-f..!- ,.,
" " I'l
--,'-'
~ ."~--~
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
r:-.-", Q
~-~!'! '!
<Co
...
4
'"
Co
'"
4
'"
,..
'"
...
0>
'"
4
."
'"
'"
'"
<
,.
o
,Yo
Co
o
n'
'"
a>
~
'"
Co
'"
Co
o
n.
.'.
a>
~
a>
o
'"
. n
.. .. :!
~'
. , .
~ "'.!'!
~.; ~_; ; ; ':.;~ ;.& ~ 'i"~li" j' i'
...J
..;
...
C>
t-
o
~
"
'"
~ ~
,...
o/J-;::--il- <II
.. .. ., .,
. -'
~ rl "
,...
--;;; c, c ,
~/90
POLICE DEPARTMENT
-~
1.612-421.6632
Fax Number:
1,612.422.2092
CITY OF ANDOVER
June 26, 1990
James E. Schrantz, Administrator
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
The City of Anoka Police Department, through its school
liaison program, instructs the D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse
Resistance Education) program to all 5th grade students who
attend school in Anoka.
The D.A.R.E. program was originally conceived by the Los
Angeles Police Chief and the Los Angeles Superintendent of
Schools. It is aimed at the demand side of illegal drug use
and targeted at the 5th grade student level. The purpose of
the program is to give students every opportunity through
proper instruction to resist any and all illegal drug use.
It is one of the few programs in the country which appears to
be working.
Presently, the City of Anoka commits resources to police
officers' salaries, who are instructors in this program, and
we seek assistance for approximately $8000 worth of training
materials that are used. It costs about $11.45 per student
for just the materials used.
:;J
~
~.!-- ~~
::-~l{i.\~
t~ ~a.~/~ ~:
,f.'t\'_.~ ,I,
~.~...-
-~~;.~'-.-
.ji a..
AN INTERNATIONALLY ACCREDITED LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
,
-\
'J
Mr. Schrantz
Page Two
June 26, 1990
We believe the D.A.R.E. program is an educational means to
assist with the reduction of drug abuse. D.A.R.E. is a long
term commitment, however, and must be taught each year.
There are approximately 90 students from the City of Andover
who will be attending 5th grade in City of Anoka Schools
during the 1990-91 school season. We are requesting that
your community assist us with the cost of materials to
educate Andover kids in the D.A.R.E. program. At $11.45 per
student, we are requesting assistance for materials in the
amount of $1,030.50 from your community.
If the City itself chooses
worthwhile endeavor for your
encourage you to pass this
groups.
not to assist
communities'
request on
us in this
children, I
to Andover
very
would
Civic
I would be happy to speak
presentation to your City
appropriate. I look forward
with you personally or make any
Council, whichever you may deem
to hearing from you.
Andrew C. Revering
Chief of Police
cc: Mark Nagel
Anoka City Manager
\J
.:_)
,
:... -.J
News Release
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
~
\':(SCP
Printed on Recycled Paper
(V
11rhD
FORIM:MEDIATERELEASE: June25,1990
CONTACT:
Katherine Carlson, MPCA
(612) 296-6605
MN toll-free 1-800-652-9747
---.-.. _.---_.-,.--_..
lt~ E,=, fi".,' r~';l V ~,f,' n~" ,.
f1 N ~, ". ~~' "./ .J1 ~ _ '~
ij1~~'~~;:~'I~~~11 ..
-.",. ...
Gina Weber, u.s. EPA
(312) 353-3207
toll-free 1-800-621-8431
CITY OF ANDOVER
SU
IGATION UNDERWAY AT SOUTH ANDOVER SITE
A survey team begins work June 26 on the South Andover Superfund site, the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (MPCA) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said today. These
measurements precede the U.S. EP A's investigation of soil at the site, with field work beginning in mid-
July.
The soil studies signal the second phase of activity at the South Andover sites. The investigation of
ground water contamination at the site was completed in February 1988, when a cleanup solution for the
ground water was proposed. Soil testing was delayed, first by the large pile of waste tires on-site, then
by changes in site conditions resulting from the Andover tire fire in February 1989. Portions of the site
were fenced in summer of 1989 for site security and to eliminate indiscrimate dumping. All the
unburned tires were shredded and removed from the site in October 1989.
Among the activities planned for mid-July are soil borings, digging of trenches on some parts of the
site, and sampling of monitoring wells. The soil contaminated by the tire fire will be tested during these
summer field activities to determine if this residue is a hazardous waste.
The South Andover site was used in the past for disposal of industrial wastes from the Twin Cities
metropolitan area, including solvents, paints, adhesives and ink sludges. These wastes have
contaminated soil, surface water and ground water at the site. The EP A is the lead agency for cleanup
and enforcement activities.
###
rr- C c-
/o '.
Office of~__,_.7/.IJ/
ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S ,:,...'",.iJa,'. fAE.flfID" "
KENNE111 G. WILKINSON - SI iftlf' ~~;~-'2"""""1:-9-0-1 ·
j i. J,. - 7 .J. I
.",..,.
Courthouse - 325 East MaiTl Street - ATloka, liuTlefJiriY55J03 /\~mOVER
612-42/-4760
CITY OF ANDOVER
MONTHLY CONTRACT PRODUCTIVITY REPORT
Month:
May
, 1990
This report reflects the producti vi ty of the Andover contract
cars, 3125, 3135, 3145 and 3155. It does not include activity
by Sheriff's Department cars within the City during non-contract
hours, nor, acti vi ty by other Sherif f 's Department cars wi thin
the City during contract'hours.
Arrests: Traffic 57
DWI
3
Radio Calls 421
Complaints 337
Medicals 13
P. I. Accidents 5
P.D. Accidents 5
Domestics 12
House Checks 101
Business Checks 346
Arrests: Felony 6
G.M.
o
Misdemeanor 16
Arrests: Warrant 1
Papers Served
1
Warnings
31
Aids: Public
33
Other Agencies 52
TOTAL MILES PATROLLED:
10,631
, )
Captain Len Christ
Anoka County Sheriff's Department
Patrol Division
.._f .......____s.._~:... t"'_.~,I.............
, )
. 'fJ~""'~""J
. 6 {
'. ....1
7:30 P.M.
:J
CITY of ANDOVER
Regular City Council Meeting-July 3, 1990
Call to Order
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
,Approval of Minutes
Discussion Items
1. Special Use Permit/Po Blake
2. Special Use Permit/Blue Line collision
3. Special Use Permit/Continental Development
4. Variance;Woodland Development
5. Variance/Lyle Dunn
6. Park Dedication Fees/Lot Splits
Staff, Committee, Commission
7. Carpet Replacement, Cont.
8. Award Bid/Backhoe Loader
9. Approve 1990 CDBG Subgrantee Agreement
10. Commercial Park Lot Purchases
11. CDBG Grant Analysis
12. Approve Election Judges
13. Authorization/Contract Ditch Mowing
14. Resignation/planning Commission Member
Non-Discussion Items
15. Receive 1989 Audit Report
16. Award Bid/90-2/164th & Jonquil
17. Receive Feasibility Report/90-14/176th & Blackfoot
18. Approve Plans & Specs/90-12
19. Approve Plans & Specs/90-13
20. Release Grading Escrow/Red Oaks Manor 6th
Approval of Claims
:)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
. '\
"-./
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPROV~
NO. Administration AGENDf'
ITEM \Y V
NO. Approval of Minutes V. Volk \Y B~/
BY:
(/
The City Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
June 5, 1990 Regular Meeting (Jacobson absent)
June 13, 1990 Special Meeting (Orttel absent)
June 19, 1990 Regular Meeting ( Elling absent)
June 19, 1990 Special Closed Meeting (Elling absent)
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY SECOND BY
TO
DATE ,Tn 1 y 1 r 1 qqn
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
July 3, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
~~
FOR
ITEM
NO.
1. Special Use Permit/
P. Blake
BY:
REQUEST
The City Council is requested to review and approve the Special
Use Permit to mine soil as requested by Paul Blake in Section 15,
per Ordinance 8, Section 4.24. See enclosed drawing.
GENERAL REVIEW
The neighbors within 350 feet of the property were notified of the
hearing. The item was published in the Anoka County Union.
REVIEW CRITERIA
The property owner has requested to mine and remove dirt. from Jeff
Bergeron's property in Section 15. A majority of the dirt will be
stockpiled and then removed from the property.
Section 5.03 of Ordinance 8 outlines the criteria to use in order
to determine the acceptability of the Special Use Permit,
including "the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the occupants of surrounding lands,
existing and anticipated traffic conditions on adjacent streets,
including parking facilities, the effect on values of property and
scenic views in the area and the effect on the Comprehensive
plan".
The following review criteria should be examined carefully:
use on the health, safet , morals
commun~ty.
The proposal will have no significant negative impact on the
health, morals and general welfare of the community. There is a
proposed haul road which would utilize Hanson Boulevard.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
\~ TO
SECOND BY
-:J
Page Two
July 3, 1990
2) The existing and antici~ated traffic conditions on adjacent
streets, including park1ng facilities.
The proposal will not have a significant impact on existing
traffic conditions on Hanson Boulevard.
Approximately 37,610 yJ are proposed to be removed. Soils are of
mostly black used as topsoil for residential areas.
3) The effect on values of property and scenic views in the
surrounding area.
The proposal will have no significant negative impact on property
values in the area. Stockpiles will be hidden from the
surrounding property due to the number of existing trees.
4) The effect on the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposal will have no significant negative impact on the
Comprehensive Plan.
CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS
A. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission has reviewed and
recommends to the City Council approval of the Special Use
Permit to mine dirt in Section 15, as allowed by Ordinance 8,
Section 4.24 subject to the following as requested by Paul
Blake:
1. Safety precautions be taken at the end of each working day
to prevent injury to playing children, bike riders,
snowmobilers, etc.
2. The applicant shall provide the City of Andover with a
security bond to hold the City harmless for restoration of
the site as determined by the City Engineer.
3. Signs to be placed on County Road 78 (Hanson Boulevard) as
required by the Anoka County Highway Department.
4. The applicant is requested to make reasonable use of the
property without altering the topography greatly.
5. watering of the haul road to control dust during dry
times.
6. Hauling of material is Monday through Friday, 8:00 A.M. to
8:00 P.M. and Saturdays, 8:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M.
.,J
.)
Page Three
July 3, 1990
7. The applicant is required to restore the banks of the
mined area after the area has been excavated using an
approved topsoil, seed, and/or vegetation or mulch to
establish erosion control.
8. Obtaining all necessary permits from the DNR, u.s. Army
Corps of Engineers, the Watershed Organization, and any
other agency which may be interested in the site.
9. The applicant has indicated the area would be completed
one year from the date of approval.
10. Haul routes for removing dirt from the project will be
Hanson Boulevard.
11. This Special Use Permit is for a maximum of 38,000 yd3 of
dirt.
12. This permit is subject to review yearly and could be
extended for a total period not to exceed two years, at
which time the applicant may apply for another Special Use
Permit upon satisfactorily completing all procedures as
approved by the City Engineer.
13. This permit is subject to significant progress being made
within one year, or this permit becomes null and void.
B. The City Council may recommend denial of the Special Use
Permit to mine dirt in Section 15 as requested by Paul Blake.
The City Council finds that the request will have a
detrimental effect on the general health, safety, morals or
welfare of the community, and that the request will have a
negative impact on traffic or parking conditions, and that the
proposal will have a detrimental effect on property values or
scenic views in the area.
C. The City Council may table this item.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Option A.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Planning and Zoning Commission, per the June 12, 1990 meeting,
recommends Option A.
~J
:J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY PAUL
BLAKE TO MINE SOIL FROM THE PROPERTY AT 16422 HANSON BOULEVARD NW
DESCRIBED AS THAT PART OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, AND THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15 BOTH IN TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24 AS
REQUIRED PER ORDINANCE 8, SECTION 4.24.
WHEREAS, pursuant to published and mailed notice, the
Planning and Zoning Commission has conducted a public hearing and
reviewed the request of Paul Blake to mine soil; and
WHEREAS, the Special Use Permit has been reveiwed by the City
Engineer; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to hereby approve the Special Use Permit for Paul
Blake with the following conditions:
1. Safety precautions be taken at the end of each working
day to prevent injury to playing children, bike riders
and snowmobilers, etc.
2. The applicant shall provide the City with a security bond
to hold harmless for restoration of the site as
determined by City Engineer.
3. Signs be placed on both sides of the driveway at Hanson
Boulevard indicating trucks hauling.
4. The applicant is requested to make reasonable use of the
property without altering the topography greatly.
5. watering the roadway to control dust at dry times.
6. Hauling of material is Monday through Friday, 8:00 A.M.
to 8:00 P.M. and Saturdays, 8:00 A.M. until 4:00 P.M.
7. The applicant is required to restore the banks of the
mined area after the area has been excavated using an
approved topsoil, seed, and/or vegetation or brush to
establish erosion control.
~)
8. Obtaining all necessary permits from the DNR, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, the Watershed Organization, and any
other agency which may be interested in the site.
9. The applicant has indicated the area would be completed
one year from the date of approval.
10. Haul routes for removing dirt from the project will be
Hanson Boulevard.
11. This Special Use Permit is for a maximum of 38,000 yd3 of
dirt.
, \
, )
12. This permit is subject to reveiw yearly and could be
extended for a total period not to exceed two years, at
which time the applicant may apply for another Special
Use Permit upon satisfactorily completing all procedures
as approved by the City Engineer.
13. This permit is subject to significant progress being made
within one year, or this permit becomes null and void.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Andover that the Planning and Zoning Commission finds
the following:
1. There was a public hearing at which there were no
comments made, either negatively or positively.
2. The proposal will have no significant negative impact on
the health, morals and general welfare of the community.
3. The proposal will not have a significant impact on
existing traffic conditions.
4. The proposal will have no significant negative impact on
property values in the area.
5. The proposal will have no significant negative impact on
the Comprehensive Plan.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of
, 1990.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
\
-~
@
~-J
'-~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD. N.W.
ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304
SUP ~
SPECIAL USE PERMIT. REQUEST FORM
Property Address
/{. L/ M NIlrV.So N (&- t.l1J
AN /Y) tJh~
Legal Description of Property:
(fill in whichever is appropriate)
Lot
Block
Addition
Plat
Parcel
PIN 'R IS-3d. -;2'-1 -1/ - CJDt:J I -f, oQO:.2 -( cocY!
(If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal)
Reason for Request J1l1.N'//tJ <;
I
(;) I tDLIP;; PO,,} ])5
(),c t6LAc,k bl/?..r 7D 1YJ4/6.':.
'.
Section of Ordinance g led,...... Lf,2'1'Current Zoning
12 - / 5r;-O(:l-Ie ;:;.. t,! ,',.,. tI2", r..1
v .
**********************************************************************
Name of Applicant
PAL1L
~~
./3" f'! k E . ,
(_oo/v iZc.~ I (1J-J
Business Phone "7 <)<1- .;z I... )~
Date
Address i (J~::J,) Q,II: tJ,J
Home Phone 7rC-(-2t.. 7"1
Signature \)~ ~
-
*********************************************************~************
Property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
:17.-:: Fr:- I]L::- ~ be /?.r'! rJ
Address
Jl.-~ DarPL j1l;J
5S5Jf1'
/{., if d..d-.. ;I.4rJ6&J .(],<V ()
Home phone ~~.3J,;z BUSin. ess Phone
Signature '---~~U' IJu, ~tLl-"'- Date
**********************************************************************
c5/ln7~
4-30-90
Attach a scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent
streets; and location and use of existing structures within 100 feet.
The names and addresses of
subject property must also
Application fee: $150.00
filing fee: $10.00
all property owners within 350
be provided.
Date .aid ~41t(}.eceiPt I
feel: of the
~z!<j %
~
" .
~) /-.~
(~
CITY of ANDOVER
APPLICATION fOR LAND RECLAMATION, MINING, OR SOIL PROCESSING
Permit fee
Receipt II
Date Paid
$ - /&t7-
,</,s-c,
5"- 3"-'7'''
Permit No.
The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the
excavation, removal or grading of rock, sa~d, dirt, gravel, clay
and other like material'within the City of Andover, agreeing to
do all work in strict compliance with City Ordinances and hereby
declares that all the facts and representations stated in this
application are true and correct.
Applicant PI/c.A.L B/ A f [:- Telephone
Address I () ~ =< I (')')\),' "-" 0 C,J,,("?v RC! (\! rR)
~ 'II ~
Owne r of Land JK-Fl~ !3i..:::',fJ7(::;< CJ,J Telephone
Address /f('t..( J.J. !/-,<:;,.J>d,1.1 15L. JD 1-1~ bcJv~1?.
7..s-t1--2 b 73
Ul,l.. ;~ /.-2 ')
. VI : ~.;:.JOI'
/IV; ( "----3 " u
!.-v \10 fl.,
The correct legal description of the premises where:
f>'-]Z -'L't - II - e"",,/
PIN IIR!~~))-~1-1~o~he removal or excavation of rock, sand, dirt,
Is-.}~_~~-~-~~ravel, clay or other like materials shall or
does occur, or
PIN II
the storage or disposition of rock, sand, dirt,
gravel, clay or other like materials shall or
does occur, or
PIN II
gradIng of rock, sand, dirt, gravel, clay or
other like materials shall or does occur.
Estimated time schedule of intermediate operations of the
removal, storage or excavation / VEAl<..
. /
Estimated date of completion of the above operation
Statement of purpose for removal, storage or excavation
t?L..q.-k [)/IL7"
i../- 3()- 91
oP
Complete list of highways, streets or other
the City upon and along which the materials
shall be transported
/1-A-1Il Jc)-J .(j111 ^
public ways within
excavated or removed
(J
~)
Per~ns responsible for actual operation of the site
,Jj.bA-K2 --t:I...=;CP (?c/l&i-Il...t1',J
Type of Equipment / VU/YlP 1R...U( J.. "'If- 11 CJAr!~t'(.
Map or plat showing the following five (5) items (may be on same
map) :
P4tAL
1. The existing land elevations and water table elevations
based on sea level readings.
2. The proposed pit or excavation to be made showing the
confines or limits thereof together with the proposed
finished elevations (side slopes not to exceed 4:1)
based on sea level readings.
3. Present zoning and land use (parcel and within 350' of
affected property).
4. Proposed zoning and land use (if change is desired).
5. Scale to the nearest .10 feet, north arrow, and existing
street names.
Surety or Security Bond, in such form and sum as set by Council
Resolution, running to the City, conditioned to pay the City the
cost and expense of:
a. Repairing any highways, streets, or other public ways
within the City made necessar~ by the special burden
resulting from hauling and transporting thereon by the
applicant, the amount of such cost to be determined by
the City Council; and conditioned further to save the
City free and harmless from any and all suits or claims
for damages resulting from the negligent excavation,
removal or storage of rock, sand, dirt, gravel, clay or
other like material within the City.
b. Renovating the site to an approved land use in the event
of revocation of said permit by either party.
Applicant is required to furnish certificates of insurance to the
City in the amounts of at least $100,000.00 bodily injury
liability per person; $300,000.00 per person for injuries or
death arising from anyone occurrence; and $50,000.00 property
damage liability for anyone occurrence.
Such insurance shall include a ten (10) day notice of
cancellation or non-renewal of insurance and such notice shall be
provided to the City upon its issuance.
u
Describe precautions to be t:'l""" tu t:'VC.,i~l rre"l-ing nuisances or
hazards to public health am,1 .s;.;,.hdy.
~)
.~
,
'.:.;.
Applicant shall post at said site a copy of the Permit granted
and a copy of the Resolution of the City granting such Permit.
~~pnc~
~{t;~~
~)
(
c
<J
(
.'
.,.,
"
DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
PLANNING
Present Zoning
Proposed Zoning
Present Land Use
Proposed Land Use
Ultimate Land Use
Recommendations to Planning Commission
.'
ENGINEERING
Drainage
Water table
Haul Roads
Street Load Restrictions
Bridge Crossings
,
Mining Procedures and Equipment
Dust Control
Restoration
Location of Utilities
How the Proposed Contours Relate to the Proposed Land Use,
Streets Grades, Utility Grades, etc.
Recommendations to City Council
.t.
. 4
:~ "
..... .
. . .~..
.. . It." .
, '\
'--./
(
.~~
(
'..-'--.
APPROVALS
Comments & Restrictions of the Planning Commission:
Approval of Planning Commission
Chairman
Comments & Restrictions of the City Council:
Approval of the City Council
Mayor
.:. I
.'
~. :
....'
(..... S....:I.....:.'::r..t
, '\
V
~)
.~.r"'~'.:_->'
(.- .\
. -
. .
j ",
~" 1
\" ... /
~~~":"'::!'~.l:.'.i...;..~,...J""
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.w, . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY Of ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The City of Andover Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a
public hearing at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, June 12, 1990 at the Andover
City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Mn to consider
the request of Paul, Blake for 'a Special Use Permit to mine dirt
from the property at 16422 Hanson Boulevard NW described as that
part of the North 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of
Section 15, and the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section
15 both in Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota.
All opponents and proponents of said Special Use Permit will be
heard at the above time and location.
~ia
Victor~a Volk, City Clerk
15 32 24 21 0001
Verna Kulenkamp
16337 Verdin street
Andover, Mn 55304
:) 32 24 11 0003
-Dorothy Aasness
16425 Hanson Boulevard
Andover, Mn 55304
10 32 24 43 0002
Lawrence Morrell
1850 - 167th Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
10 32 24 34 0003
William Bradish Jr.
2050 - 167th Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
<)
15 32 24 24 0013
Gerald Bosen
2027 - 161st Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
15 32 24 14 0001
Edward Bayers
1657 - 161st Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
10 32 24 44 0002
Jerome Pikus
16526 Hanson Boulevard
Andover, Mn 55304
14 32 24 22 0004
Doroth Aasness
16425 Hanson Boulevard
Andover, Mn 55304
15 32 24 13 0001
Peter & Roma Leuty
1947 - 161st Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
10 32 24 43 0004
Randall Plaisance
1928 - 167th Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
10 32 24 44 0003
Donald Osman Sr.
1781 - 167th Avenue
Andover, Mn 55304
14 32 24 22 0002
Richard Aasness
16425 Hanson Boulevard
Andover, Mn 55304
~)
'G
~
"
~
, ~
1'0
"'0
1JJ
r;l,)
C.
(/)
u
Q}
'is
::J
en
:,-J
w
"
..
U)
U)
w
:::E
~\
~~
" ~
\j
"
"
>-
-'
a.
w
a:
'0
Q}
c:
OJ
en
Q}
<1l
o
~
~,
~
o.
-,
~,
0_
~
~.
tl1i~ ,\ " '/I!' ,/~~ \1\ ,- ~ ~'V~' i-/--;;:::--t-___,---l____-'
;;~o~A' '.~'\: ,t~~~O'2 '~~~.':"':1'1'" ., - I~
' o. S ,"000 ~' d.. , ! ,(
~ ~. . '1', , '~IOG~: ' ' .' , \, '
. '(i) . - ,~_ ,'---- "W ~
T .:..::-i l4 I 4\ It} ~ ' 1 I. I
'-::--:: ;:;- -', :~ '- . - - . ~,', :.~, M~ ,,"'''AAS'~ -; ~ "~
,-,F)j;.... ;, , = . "~,,,. '1 "" : _-=- i I I
, "" '--"," :'1''', I I
~ ' , ~I.~....
IW/fl!l . . . 'Jv.,~" I ' I
, __ n_ 4' k:5A-K.S', __n_n 1-.1._ .L.! ...';~.t'-~~~~----=:i=_t--=-=-=-=--=-, I
,'..100t\\ '_t.'fJlfNIi Y. - - I -"", -- /I~~~n-T~-----r-I ----
. .--O=-- I ' ,
iA,rn'; 'I S:~7;ti'S' - I "'-\, , 'i I , I
~E:C'2- j I., \ I "'" I 4 I
~" " .... ~ I
"ION I 3. ,,~ ',',
,
/, iu OS, \ 'E'\ "'Rq1Ef~2.
_\,
~~
a 'E,frA('ES 3' i [J '5 /I' . g I
~ I L ~o: ' A ,,~ ,4 . ~
- 'f.~ I
jtGfl ;t\ _ .
I 2 "" ",.,L.or- I. . ADO.' \ .. "
I ':. :,: 9ji~,,: I LJ
I:~ ~ m:= 5' kftl ~r~/!r -
. ~...,~~~
I ---+;;o~A... ~ ~oy" ! '." /1 "
'\~...t"- i /~Wl ~
I ~'~~" ,/ //~ ~
~ /IV r
rrlI\" V I, !h i
___.......,......c --.....<> .A~A-COtlNF' .,;",. ~ 4:.1
= - H _, ll. I
C-'- --1::-- .,"~ ,;;, . I
" :'~j="\ I
~>r--1 I \""1 CD I
, '-.... -,-..-J
t--, '-....
, '.
r- _ ~
.~
-
, ,
"",' 1
.1,
- ~ ----~',\"
21 " ....
~ I '
l~,
. ,
, ,
.~, " "
;;
o
N
=
, -
......-:::::
--:::::::::::--
-- ~:::::::::;;"''-f1,~::;;.;z..
I _
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
.
'.
"
~
.,
-I
\0
,
,
!
i~ ...~ .~..-.!!!.~.~.-t__.-.
ULJ
I
I
I
I
L_
I
I
I
I
J..
i
~''''
-~
, i----
~ -----------
I
I
\J~
-
r-~
~ ~
~
I ------ .d." ~I
I~ ~-
--L--~ -1-----+-----]6"
I ~~ I .
I .
I II ~ ~...ky(
I : ~I
- - - - - I
'r-, :rr....';'.\A.'I'~ II
:I---l" r.ITY': ,.' 1'-....:
i FIRE OEP"RTMENT:;:: ~~.I i-'~~ : .. I "l
~ I I I .... ......'--;: I I ~
! ~,F--- ~~-----4----
(\ ;I\~,~~",:~~ i
""NI~HJNG~J
~'fF'a:::~EJT~ro" ~
NlGHrlN~ffE. ~ I
"ESrAr,S, 8~
~
,
- C{Ti~~
., ,
p'RO. , I
___J
._*- ~
,
,
~l~ l,
"
'-J
\)
I
I
I
I
,
.
h
j
'\
, /
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
3 July 1990
DATE
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ~~~ROVE~D FOR
NO. Discussion Planning/Zoning 4
ITEM 2. 2352 NW 136th Ave. \~)J\)/
NO, BlueLine Collision SUP BY: d' Arcy Bosell ~ BY: Iv
The City Council is requested consider the Special Use permit
application of Blue Line collision Center to operate a repair
garage in a General Business (GB) District on the property
located at 2352 NW 136th Avenue (Lot 2, Block 2, Andover
Commercial Park).
The Planning & Zoning Commission has reviewed said request at
their regular meeting on June 12, 1990, and recommends approval
for the request.
Attached hereto are the Planning & Zoning Commission packet
materials, the minutes of their meeting, and a Resolution for
your consideration.
MOTION BY
) TO
"'
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
~)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE Of MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -90
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF RIC
HAUGLAND D/B/A BLUE LINE COLLISION CENTER TO OPERATE A REPAIR
GARAGE IN A GENERAL BUSINESS (GB) DISTRICT ON THE PROPERTY
DESCRIBED AS LOT 2, BLOCK 2, ANDOVER COMMERCIAL PARK.
WHEREAS, Ric Haugland d/b/a Blue Line collision Center has
requested a Special Use Permit to operate a repair garage in a
General Business District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & zoning Commission has reviewed the
request and has determined that said request meets the criteria
of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 and 7.03; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was input
received; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & zoning Commission recommends to the
City Council approval of the Special Use Permit requested, with
conditions; -
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Andover hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Ric
Haugland d/b/a Blue Line collision Center to conduct a repair
garage business in a General Business (GB) District, with the
following conditions:
1. That the applicant will complete and file a Commercial Site
plan and that said plan will be reviewed and approved by the
Andover Review Committee.
2. That the applicant will maintain all current State and County
hazardous material generators' permits on file with the City
Planning Department;
3. That the applicant will include additional berms and both
deciduous and confierous plantings on the south and west side
of the property line as part of the overall landscaping plan.
~J
4. That the applicant agrees not to store any inoperable,
unlicensed or dismantled vehicles outside of the proposed
building;
5. That the site plan will provide the required number of
parking spaces as required by Ordinance No.8, Section 8.08.
6. That if significant progress has not been made within twelve
(12) months of the granting of the Special Use Permit, the
Permit shall be declared null and void by the City Council.
~J
7. That the Special Use Permit is subject to annual review by
the Ci ty Staff.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 3rd
day of July, 1990.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
~J
~)
Regular Planning & Zoning Meeting
Minutes--June 12, 1990
Page -6-
Also, staff does not feel the variance is necessary to allow
the property owner the reasonable use of the property.
Mr. Dunn stated the grade of the driveway would be affected
if the garage is to be set further to the west because of
the sloping factor.
It is Staff's opinion that the request does not meet the
hardship requirements as set forth in the City's Zoning Ordin~nce
and recommends denial of this requ~st.
MOTION by Vistad and seconded by Spotts that the Andover Planning
and zoning Commission recommend to the Andover City Council
denial of the variance requested by Lyle Dunn to allow the
construction of an accessory structure to within three feet
of side yard, therefore requiring a seven foot side yard variance
on the property described as Lot 4, Block 2, Red Oaks Manor,
Second Addition. The proposal does not meet the requirements
set forth in the City's zoning Ordinance 8, Section 5.04.
The Commission finds that no hardship exists due to the unique
shape or topography of the property that would preclude the
owner from reasonable use of his property.
The variance would not have a significant negative impact
on the public welfare, however no justification to grant the
variance exists on the property.
The request for an accessory building is reasonable, however
the location does cause some difficulty because there is nothing
in the lay of the land to prevent locating the building another
seven feet to the west to meet the setback requirements.
No hardship is created by requiring the structure to meet
setback requirements.
Motion carried unanimously.
!
PUBLIC HEARING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, BLUELINE COLLISION, REPAIR
BUSINESS IN GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, 2352 - 136TH AVENUE N.W.
, )
This is a request for a Special Use Permit_to allow the operation
of a repair garage in Andover's Commercial Park. The owner,
Ric Haugland, is awaiting approval from the City on this location
in order to secure Small Business Administration funding for
the project. Mr. Haugland has also appeared before the Economic
Development Committee to review the plans. They have recommended
the Special Use Permit be obtained prior to the City selling
the property to the a~plicant.
:J
Regular Planning & zoning Meeting
Minutes--June 12, 1990
Page -7-
The proposed business is a collision repair business specializing
in insurance work. It has been in operation for several years
at 14114 Round Lake Boulevard. This property is zoned R-4
single family, and Staff has been working with the owner to
move the business from the residential district to the Commercial
Park for nearly a year.
Blake stated the proposed development site is approximately
1.7 acres, and the building size would be 11,524 square feet
and would meet setback requirements.
The building will include office space, repair areas and a
paint room. The proposed plans also include a six foot high
wood fence, plantings for screening and the required number
of parking spaces.
Blake also stated that the applicant is aware that no inoperable
and/or unlicensed vehicles or dismantled vehicles may be stored
outside of the building. Mr. Haugland stated that this would
not be a problem because the majority of the vehicles outside
would be those waiting to be picked up.
Spotts stated that even if a vehicle was parked outside because
they were waiting for a par~, that this did not necessarily
mean the vehicle was inoperable under the definition of the
ordinance.
Ferris questioned the possibility of having a higher fence,
perhaps eight feet. Staff stated that the engineering design
for that high of a fence would have to include special needs
for potential wind damage and makes it very costly.
PUBLIC HEARING
At this time the Public Hearing was opened.
Keith Nelson, 2363 - 135th Avenue N.W. stated that he lives
just south of this proposed site. His house sits on a hill
and is concerned that there is maximum screening, although
he knows it would be impossible to screen it entirely. He
also stated he was aware that this was a commerical area and
eventually businesses would be building there.
He also expressed concern about potential water and land pollution.
There is a drainage area and he was concerned that if there
was a paint spill, it could back up and destroy the grass
of the surrounding yards.
.~
~,
~)
Q
Regular Planning & zoning Meeti~g
Minutes--June 12, 1990
Page -8-
Mr. Haugland explained how the painting operation would work,
and stated that his hazardous waste would be picked up by
a company specializing in this. He stated there will be special
hook-ups from the building that will go straight into the
truck. The air-exchange unit will exchange the air in the
building six times every hour.
Mr. Nelson stated he felt better with this knowledge.
Staff stated the drainage study was completed for the entire
commercial park and takes into consideration this drainage
area and holding ponds area. Staff stated that buildings
are restricted to 30% of the ground cover.
MOTION by spotts and seconded by Vis tad to close Public Hearing.
Motion was carried unanimously.
Ferris expressed concern that this is not an appropriate use
for a new building in the Commercial Park.
MOTION by Vistad and seconded by Peeks that the Andover Planning
and zoning Commission recommend to the Andover City Council
approval of the Special Use Permit requested by Blueline Colli&ion,
to allow the operation of a repair garage in a GB district
as allowed by Ordinace 8, Section 7.03 by the following described
property: Lot 2, Blk2, Andover Commercial Park, Anoka County,
Minnesota.
The proposed use would not be detrimental to the general health,
safety, morals and general welfare of the community. It will
not cause serious traffic congestion or hazards. It will
not seriously depreciate surrounding property values. It
is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
A Public Hearing was held and one individual had a written
statement, but did not seem to have a problem. One individual
appeared at the Public Hearing to express concerns about fencing
and drainage.
The approval is subject to the following conditions:
A. Approval is subject to filing and completing the
Commercial Site Plan process including review
and approval byth~ Andover Review Committee.
B. The applicant will keep all current state and
local hazardous materials generators permits on
file with the City Planning Department.
C. If significant progress is not made within twelve
months of the approval of the Special Use Permit,
The permit shall be declared null and void by
the City Council.
,]
: ~
'J
Regular Planning & Zoning Meeting
Minutes--June 12, 1990
Page -9-
D. The applicant will include additional berms
and both deciduous and coniferous plantings on
the south and west sides of the property line
as part of the overall landscaping plan.
E. The applicant will not store any inoperable,
unlicensed or dismantled vehicles outside of the
proposed building.
F. The site plan will allow for required parking
facilities on the site.
G. This is subject to a yearly review by Staff.
Discussion included Ferris' objections to approving a new
building for this type of business in the Commercial Park.
vote on MOTION: Yes--Spotts, Peek, Vistad and Pease. No--
Ferris with explanation as follows:
1) I do not believe that the Special Use Permit
should be used to create a building. It should be used to
allow different uses within a building. I believe that when
granting a Special Use permit and placing special criteria on
it the City is not in a position to uphold the criteria when
extensive financial im~lications have been involved for the
developer or the owner in order to execute the special use
permit.
2) I also do ~ot believe it is in the best interest
of the GB district or this particular industrial park.
Motion carried.
VARIANCE, WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT, FRONT YARD SETBACK, 13373
LILY STREET N.W.
Blake stated that this is a request by Woodland Development
for a two foot variance on ~.home constructed by them for
Mr. and Mrs. Dan Sigmon at 13373 Lily Street N.W. Specifications
for the home when it was built was for the garage to be
22 x 22 feet. Unfortunately the garage was constructed at
20 x 22 feet. The Sigmon's have a large older car which is
difficult to house at the current size of the garage.
woodland Development would like to construct a two foot
addition onto the existing garage structure to meet the terms
of the purchase agreement.
:)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
AGENDA ITEM
4. Special Use Permit
Blueline collision;
Repair Garage in
GB District
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
June 12, 1990
Planning
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY: Jay Blake, planner
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and zoning commission is asked to review
the Special Use Permit application of Blueline collision to allow
the operation of a repair garage in a GB District. The request is
for Lot 2, Block 2, Andover Commercial Park (2352 - NW 136th
Avenue) .
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance 8, Section 7.03 allows the operation of a repair
garage in a General Business District with the issuance of a
Special Use Permit by the City.
GENERAL REVIEW
The proposed business is a collision repair business specializing
in insurance work. It has been in operation for several years on
property located at 14114 Round Lake Boulevard. This property is
zoned R-4 single family and Staff has been working with the owner
to move the business from the residential district to the
Commercial Park for nearly a year.
The applicant is awaiting approval from the City on this location
in order to secure Small Business Administration (SBA) financing
for the project. The applicant has also appeared before the
Andover Economic Development Committee (AEDC) to review the plans.
The AEDC has recommended that the SUP be obtained prior to the
City selling the property to the applicant.
The proposed development site consists of roughly 1.7 acres and is
zoned GB - General Business. The building. size is 11,524 square
feet and meets GB setback requirements, including:
Front Yard
Side Yard
Rear Yard
40 feet
10 feet
40 feet
, \
'_I
The building uses will include office uses, repair areas, paint
booth, estimation garage and storage. A storage yard is proposed
for the area south and west of the building. Also included in the
plans is a 6' high wood fence, various plantings for screening and
the required number of parking spaces.
~J
page 2
Blueline SUP
June 12, 1990
The applicant is aware that no inoperable and/unlicensed vehicles
or dismantled vehicles may be stored outside of the building.
Exterior elevations will be presented at the meeting and will be
subject to the City'S Ordinance *72 regulating the construction of
Commercial structures and the protective covenants on the property
as part of the Andover Commercial Park.
The City has the authority to review Special Use Permit
applications based on the overall effect on the health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the occupants of surrounding lands;
the effect on existing and anticipated traffic conditions,
including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land; the
effect on property values and scenic views; and the effect on the
Comprehensive Plan.
1. The Health, Safety, Morals and General Welfare of the
Occupants of Surrounding Lands.
The proposed use is allowed by SUP in the GB district, subject to
additional constraints and conditions placed on the operation
of the business. Conditions of operation may include number of
vehicles on the site at anyone time, screening, noise
limitations, pollution concerns etc...
Staff recommends that the permit conditions include keeping a copy
of all state and Local hazardous materials generator permits
required to operate an auto repair garage on file with the City
Planning Department.
Staff believes that the operation as proposed would not have a
significant negative impact on the health, safety and general
welfare of the community.
2. Traffic and Parking Conditions.
Parking requirements are outlined in Section 8.08 of Ordinance 8.
Industrial space requires 1 space per 800 square feet of gross
floor area. Office area requires 1 space per 150 square feet of
gross floor area. Staff has calculated the parking need to be 26
spaces. The current site plan only allows for 16 spaces. Staff
recommends that additional spaces to meet the minimum requirements
of Ordinance 8, Section 8.08, be supplied on the west side of the
building.
c~
3. property Values and Scenic Views.
Some concern has been raised regarding the view from Crosstown
Boulevard over the holding pond onto the south elevation of the
building. The site plan has indicated a group of plantings and a
6' high fence. Staff recommends that the fence be constructed and
berms be constructed with both coniferous and deciduous plantings
on the berm located south and west of the proposed fence.
~)
Page 3
Blueline SUP
June 12, 1990
The exterior of the building will be a mixture of concrete block
panels, decorative metal siding and glass. The building will be
required to be approved by the Andover Review Committee to ensure
that it meets the intent of the City Ordinances.
4. Effect on the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed use will not have a significant detrimental effect on
the Andover Comprehensive Plan and Development Framework. Staff
believes that the continued redevelopment of the auto salvage
area will occur at a faster pace with the construction of
additional buildings in the Commercial Park. The City must
continue to monitor this business and other auto related
businesses to guarantee that all requirements of the zoning
Ordinance are met.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OPTIONS:
1. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend
approval of the Special Use Permit request of Blueline
Collision to allow the operation of a repair garage in a GB
district as allowed by Ordinance 8, Section 8.08 on the
following described property:
Lot 2, Bock 2, Andover Commercial Park, Anoka County, Minnesota
The Commission finds that the request meets the conditions of a
planned Unit Development as outlined in Ordinance 8, Section
7.03 and that the deve~opment is in keeping with the intent of
the Andover Comprehensive Plan.
The approval is subject to the following conditions:
A. Approval is subject to filing and completing the Commercial
Site Plan process including review and approval by the
Andover Review Committee.
B. The applicant will keep all current state and local
hazardous materials generators permits on file with the
City planning department.
C. If significant progress is not made within twelve (12)
months of the approval of the Special Use Permit, the
Permit shall be declared null and void by the City Council
of the City of Andover.
~J
D. The applicant will include additional berms and both
deciduous and coniferous plantings on the south and west
sides of the property line as part of the overall
landscaping plan.
:)
Page 4
Blueline SUP
June 12, 1990
E. The applicant will not store any inoperable, unlicensed or
dismantled vehicles outside of the proposed building. .
F. The site plan will allow for required parking facilities on
the site.
2. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend denial
of the Special Use Permit request of Blueline collision to
allow the operation of a repair garage in a GB district as
allowed by Ordinance 8, Section 8.08 on the following described
property:
Lot 2, Bock 2, Andover Commercial Park, Anoka County, Minnesota
The Commission finds that the request does not meet the
conditions of a planned Unit Development as outlined in
Ordinance 8, Section 7.03.
3. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may table the
proposal for additional discussion.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the request with the conditions
outlined above.
:)
@
~,J
:J
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD. N.W.
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
SUP ~
SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FORM
property Address _\J(p--<h 1" ~'JhA;,v.:Yh.
(&??.3.5"JJ /JG.u /;di,t/) i$~,J
Legal Description of property:
(fill in whichever is appropriate)
~ Addition
Lot
!J:<
A:r.-p
A(\Jo ,,"'-1 (f'Y\,\ M(/f(ICJ ~lfr~
'3L/- 3~- Lc..{ 32 - cO lcr_
Block
Parcel
PIN
plat
(If metes and
bounds, attach the complete legal)
r1f4lj})(cU. l"!:f r~\ 1~} (1;~ (
(j;d. .~f3
4,b~(.-t-\. df
o
Reason for R~quest
) J.AL,U~
Section of Ordinance
'8
'-..
Current zoning
::q. C3
**********************************************************************
Name of Applicant
() , 1 I I I
\'\ \ C , ti fi C\ c< Cvv\- Q...
. iJ
~ G r \lV'1. ~ L c~l(..c.
Address
iLl II L/
T3 () LL L-R. ; 1 G,,J 0
42 I - 2807
Home phone
Business Phone
Signature
Date
**********************************************************************
property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
CtfJ
((O,\'\;U\N2-iClQ ( ,
YG-.rlc)
e-i?,
.v
~d(71)Ir
Address I (,-. ~-:;;- Cress hl:..:}1 13/ {) J. .
Home Phone ( 55'- <;) 0 0 Business Phone
Signature i:::/t'Ll/ [D. I~ (C,-lev Date :5 /f'/9()'
**********4**( *******~************************************;**********
Attach a scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent
streets; and location and use of existing structures within 100 feet.
The names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet of
subject property must also be provided.
the
.~
Filing fee:
$150.00
$10.00
Application Fee:
Da te Paid 5-/1-'10 Receipt jt
:5 -")i.S -;. t.} .
. .
, ,
J~
.....;;, ~.>-"
~~
.
I.
..
1', ~ I:
I d,
i I; j!
III i~!ii
.. ""
e] <C IJd
> == 1/11
o I
O~.:'l
",Z '- !
o <1: -
~ LL 0
::E 0 i= bm
~~ 'i
~~i......
u"'" ..r.r.
OmlJ
11;1i
.1......
_'IUIU
:J
ANDOVER COMMERCIAL PARK PHASE 1
~)
-"
/~
rrr.,
._........__r_._.....
=. =' ~-=.:::::.:.",=. ~ .":":
~
-)
:J
:,-J
,..l.....'~c.,::-;;c".c'''':,\.'.\
d ,
.( .,
:;
, 1
.\ ~'
'} .... /
~~,7
. t:'I..-u;.~~::r'
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W, . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
CITY Of ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning & zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold
a public hearing at 7:30 pm,.or as soon thereafter as can be
heard, on Tuesday, June 12, 1990, at the Andover City Hall, 1685
NW Crosstown Boulevard, Andover, MN, to consider the Special Use
Request of Ric Haugland d/b/a Blueline collision to operate an
automotive repair garage in a General Business District on the
property described as:
Lot 2, Block 2, Andover Commercial Park (34-32-24-32-0014).
Interested parties of said proposal will be heard at the above
time and location.
L~td
Victor~a Volk, City Clerk
f::).
'CY
~)
.,.
-' ." ".. ..,........~....
edit at ~~
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N, W.
ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304
RECEIVED OF $~CcO QS
'~ i l-LJ i ~~, Co l \ I <; I GV\
FOR ~~U,p
CASH CHECK
~ /..../,./r,;
FUND CODe AMOUNT
GENERAL 3Xl~ ISn oD
341 is- J (", nO
ll){2fj I / .{/ftli0
19.;U
(
..\.AT,....KIT 18) MOO"': .USINElIS ,",OlllllMS. IHC.. - N
No. 3 45 49
~ )
'-
~)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
3 July 1990
DATE
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning/Zoning
,~!J\
~
"
ITEM 3. 14433 NW Hanson Bl.
NO, Continental Dev. SUP
BY: d'Arcy Bosell
The City Council is requested to consider the Special
application of Continental Development Corporation to
real estate sign on the property generally located at
Hanson Boulevard.
APPRO~VD R
AGE~
( ,
/,
B/I/t
Use Permit
erect a
14433 NW
The Planning & zoning Commission reviewed said request at their
regular meeting on June 12, 1990, and recommends approval for the
request.
Attached hereto are the Planning & Zoning Commission packet
materials, the minutes of their meeting, and a Resolution for
your consideration.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
,) TO
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -90
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF
CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TO ERECT A REAL ESTATE SIGN
ON THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 14433 NW HANSON BOULEVARD
(PIN 26-32-24-32-0008)
, WHEREAS, Charles S. Cook on behalf of Continental Development
Corporation has requested a Special Use Permit to erect a real
estate sign on property generally located at 14433 NW Hanson
Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has reviewed the
request and has determined that the request meets the criteria of
Ordinance No.8, Section 8.07; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no public
input received; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends to the
City Council approval of the Special Use Permit as requested,
with conditions;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
city of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission to allow for the issuance of a
Special Use Permit to erect a real estate sign as requested, with
the following conditions:
1. That such sign shall be set back a minimum of fifteen
(15') feet from the intersecting street right-of-way
lines of Hanson Boulevard and Andover Boulevard (#8,
Sec. 8.10).
2. That such sign shall be limited to thirty-two (32 s.f.)
square feet in size on each side (double-faced sign).
3. That such sign shall be located a minimum of ten (10')
feet from any property line (#8, Sec. 8.07).
4. That such sign shall not be illuminated.
5. That the property owner, John and Beverly Scherer,
reserve the right to give thirty (30) day notice to
require removal of said sign.
"-
~'J
6.
That a maintenance agreement be entered into between the
applicant and the owner to assure that said sign will be
properly maintained, in a form to be approved by the
City Attorney.
,,-\
'J
7. That this Special Use Permit shall be granted for two
(2) years, and upon expiration thereof, said sign shall
be removed, unless a written request for extension is
received and granted by the City Council prior to the
expiration of this Special Use Permit.
8. That this Special Use Permit is subject to an annual
review.
9. That if significant progress is not made within one (1)
year toward the erection of said sign, this special use
permit becomes null and void.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 3rd
day of July, 1990.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling, Mayor
Victoria Volk, C~ty Clerk
~)
r
,J
Regular Planning & Zoning Meeting
Minutes--June 12, 1990
Page -4-
PUBLIC HEARING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, REAL ESTATE SIGN, 14433 N.W. HANSON BOULEVARD
Bosell stated that this is a request for a Special Use Permit
to allow Continental Development Corporation to place a real
estate sign on property owned by John and Beverly Scherer
at 14433 N.W. Hanson Boulevard. The Scherer's have joined
the application' with the reservation that they retain the
ability to give thirty day notice for removal of the sign.
The proposed sign is 32 square feet, which meets
of the Sign Section of Ordinance 8, Section 8.07.
would be subject to setback requirements.
the criteria
The sign
Bosell stated that although the sign is advertising a housing
development outside of Andover, it is allowed under the Statute.
Staff also stated that a written agreement will have to be
prepared to provide for the maintenance of the sign and the
area for review by the City Attorney.
Staff recommends approval of the request for one year with
review at the end of that time and recommends a two year
maximum.
PUBLIC HEARING
At this time, the Public Hearing portion of the meeting was
opened. There were no comments.
MOTION by Vistad and seconded by Ferris to close the Public
Hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Ferris and seconded by Vis tad that the Andover Planning
and Zoning Commission recommend to the Andover City Council
approval of a Special Use Permit to Continental Development
Corporation to erect a sign at the intersection of the southeast
corner of Andover Boulevard and Hanson Boulevard, and apProval
is contingent upon the following conditions:
:
1. Such sign will be set back the proper sight distance,
15 feet in each direction from Hanson Boulevard and
Andover Boulevard.
2. The sign would be limited to 32 square feet ln size
and would be a double-sided sign.
(J
3. The Special Use Permit is granted for a period of
two years, and the sign must be removed by Continental
Development Corporation within two years.
~J
:J
Regular Planning & Zoning Meeting
Minutes--June 12, 1990
Page -5-
4. The owner of the property maintains a right of
30 day notice to have the sign removed.
5. The sign is not to be lit.
6. The maintenance of the sign and area would have to
be in the form of a written agreement approved by
the City staff.
7. The sign shall not be within ten feet of any
property line.
8. The Special Use Permit is subject to significant
progress being made within one year, or this
permit becomes null and void.
9. The Special Use Permit is subject to a one year
review.
Motion carried unanimously~
VARIANCE, LYLE DUNN, SIDE YARD SETBACKI 2261 - 139TH AVENUE N.W.
Blake stated that this is a request of Lyle Dunn to allow
for the construction of an accessory structure to within three
feet of the side yard on his property described as Lot 4,
Block 2, Red Oaks Manor, Second Addition.
Under Section 6.02 of Ordinance 8 a side yard setback for
accessory structures is ten feet. Attached garages may encroach
to within six feet if they are at least 440 square feet in
size. The applicant is proposing to construct a 660 square
foot garage in the rear yard of the =prope~ty. The proposed
setback is three feet from the existing side property~ line,
requiring a seven foot variance from the side yard setback
requirement.
Blake stated that back in approximately 1967, a narrow wedge
piece of property was shifted to the adjoining lot of the
Dunn property because the house on the adjoining lot was mistakenly
built too close to the property line. This left the Dunn
property with a slightly narrower backyard.
Although there is a steep slope from the rear of the house
to the level area where the garage is proposed to be located,
Staff does not feel there are physical features on the property
that would preclude the owner from constructing the building
an additional seven feet to the west to meet requirements.
~)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE
12 June 1990
AGENDA ITEM
5. 14433 NW Hanson Blvd.
Continental Develop. Corp.
SUP Request: Real Estate
Sign
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
Planning/Zoning
, \\1~ "\
\\.J
I.:
BY:
BY: d' Arcy Bosell
The Planning & Zoning Commission is requested to consider the
application of Continental Development Corporation for a Special
Use Permit which would allow them to erect a Real Estate Sign on
the property located at 14433 NW Hanson Boulevard (southeast
corner of the intersection of Hanson Boulevard and Andover
Boulevard). The property is owned by John and Beverly Scherer
and they have joined the application with the reservation that
they retain the ability to give thirty (30) day notice for
removal of said sign.
Section 3.02 of Ordinance No.8 defines a "Real Estate Sign" as
"a sign offering property (land and/or buildings) for sale, lease
or rent." The text of the sign is shown on the drawing attached
to this application.
The proposed sign is thirty-two (32 s.f.) square feet in area,
which meets the criteria of the Sign Section of Ordinance No.8
at 8.07.
The property is zoned R-4 Single Family Urban Residential.
Pursuant to Ordinance No.8, section 8.07(C)1 there is allowed a
thirty-two (32 s.f.) square foot non-residential sign offering a
residential development for sale. The sign would, of course, be
subject to the setback requirements set out in that same section
(ten [10'] feet from any lot line). There is no proposal to
light the sign. Section 8.07(D)2(e) further provides that:
1. The sign area is not over two hundred (200') square feet
in area;
An application for a sign permit has been received and
the proposed sign is 32 square feet in size.
2. The. sign is located at least one hundred thirty (130')
feet from any residential structure; and
On September 15, 1987, a lot split was approved
affecting this property and resulted in the creation of
a lot 300' x 264' with frontage along Andover Boulevard.
The residential structure on the remnant parcel is
greater than 130' from the proposed sign location and
meets the criteria of the Ordinance.
, '
'-----
r ,
'J
3 .
An agreement is made to remove the sign within two (2)
years unless an extension of time is granted by the
governing body (City Council), after approval of a
Special Use Permit has been granted.
A written agreement will have to be prepared (similar to
that done with Bent Creek Estates) to provide for the
maintenance of the sign and the area. In the past that
agreement has been provided to the City Attorney after
the Special Use Permit has been granted and I expect
that this will be no exception.
This section also provides the criteria for issuance of a special
use permit for any sign and provides:
a. That such signs are not .closer than ten (10') fee.t to
any property line; and
b. Such signs do not exceed ... 32 s.f. on any other lot.
Based upon the above information and the provisions of Ordinance
No.8, the following action may be taken by the Planning & Zoning
Commission:
1. Recommend to the City Council approval of the Special Use
Permit of Continental Development Corp. to erect a Real
Estate Sign and placing thereon conditions such as size,
length of time, setbacks, sight triangle distances protected,
etc.
2. Recommend to the City Council denial of the Special Use
Permit Request of Continental Development to erect a Real
Estate Sign and setting out therein the reasons why the SUP
should not be granted.
3. Table to matter until the next regular meeting to allow time
to consider additional information, etc.
It is the recommendation of Staff that Option No. 1 be adopted by
the Planning & Zoning Commission.
~)
@
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD. N.W.
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
SUP it
90-
r )
'--~
SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FORM
property Address
/--1-1:3.3 /}UJ /-lanstn glc.,c/.
5"". F. ~ c/ //~ I!Jl.,.I?, do.4~ tr~
Legal Description of Property:
(fill in whichever is appropriate)
Lot
Block
Addition
plat
Parcel
PIN 7{b --.ddl-a-t-3.,3J - alas-
(If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal)
u J '" (7' I ('""" ~ p _. '4-
Reason for Request 7 ~ 6 j ~ ' ~
Section of Ordinance tl ~_ (9, u7 Current Zoning
R--<j-
**********************************************************************
Name of Applicant ~ #~4L. ..;-- ~
Address /26 'J3 .Le~~. .~ ~ /,.~~L.......~. rS-YJ3
Home Phone 7 S-?- 7S"(;J" Business Phone 7) 7 '7~ ('"J"
Signature ~S. ~ ~ /~ Date S--22..-"(/
*3~*~*::**~~*~*~~***~*****~*xe~***********
propertydQwner {Fee owner)J - C" S, ~.A..L------
(If different from above)
. Address ~Q \.,.:;- 4-~fi A v- _ 'Y\, '0 fJ.j~ / 4-t.\/V\ ,
Home 'hone l~'" t4 Business Phone .
Signature _ (~ _/\..,~. Date S--;;l.) -~ 0
**********************************************************************
Attach a scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent
streets; and location and use of existing structures within 100 feet.
~~ The names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet of the
subject property must also be provided.
Application fee: $150.00
filing fee: $10.00
Date Paid S-:;.-=:t?l--9'r: Receipt {t ~(u8o
, -,
'J
I
I (COUNTY ROAD NO, 78)
:- - -- - - - - - ?::.-:z::::::-~~,~~, ---::.--
I
L---
..,.
~",.,~
~~
i
'".;/~i~
I
I
I?""~.
I
!
i
I
1--
r~
w~"" w.~ "-"N.",(~'/5:W.~
~
"-
~
~
~ fi J~ w.'f:t ,,c u.w 4 d/4W4f
~
\ ~
.... .
~ .
'" .. \-;-x
\"" ~ \"'~
",,<~ ~ ~ '\::! ~
~. i.l...... ~,~ '-..:..
., :'\ ~ ~-
~ ~
\ .
-- ---- .- -.--- ---.
~
~~
t,
,\ S\
~~ l'
>; ~ ~
"-'Z
~.
...~
~
",'li..
1\\,
,
U.
I>>
Q
::'(g<f'
...
I~'
o
I
$~l 5"'
~
<;')
CD
C
-z
..:..j
-<
~
IS' LE;
~'j--
"\ ~ 'I-
~
~,
~
8
t
@
>-
"
;#: ~
'J,
~
1>
~
m
:
;:
~J
Ljr
'-)
OAK HILL ESTATES
1-1/2 ACRE HOMESITES
->
2 MILES EAST
f
<{I
L(J('A//t>""
/7'1 /I /.J
,
"'I
1-'1
,l .
" fl /'/_cI'Q V_~/-{__~_6 I (/ c',
I 1-.
, "I -=..o.::..L
" ~
'" ,
. t~. S;'df..J
; ~. II
: l(.;
i:~
i i
. i :
~)
:.J
r~/"""_."'...:
./ '\
\ ]
., 8 /
'\...... /
.~~=.;/
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE Of MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold
a public hearing at 7:30 pm, or as soon thereafter as can be
heard, on Tuesday, June 12, 1990, at the Andover City Hall, 1685
NW Crosstown Boulevard, Andover, MN, to consider the Special Use
Permit Request of Continental Development Corporation to erect a
thirty-two (32 s.f.) square foot sign for the purpose of
directing buyers to the development known as Oak Hill Estates on
the property located at:
14433 NW Hanson Boulevard (PIN 26-32-24-32-0005)
Interested parties of said proposal will be heard at the above
time and location.
L. r '
. t-u:..-- d~-&-'
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
1\.:1
\;;Y
T. M. & M. K. Adler
1480 NW Andover Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
'r----K. J. & C. L. Heil
'~1425 NW Andover Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
G. A. Lee & T. L. Scheid
14515 NW Drake str.
Andover, MN 55304
.' '\
,)
C. J. & M. A. Hartfiel
% R. & D. Dryden
19433 NW Uranium str.
Anoka, MN 55303
W. G. & K. M. Hupp
1650 NW Andover Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
G. H. & G. V. Zelazny
1311 NE Adams Str.
Mpls., MN 55413
C. J. & M. A. Hartfie
14853 NW 7th Avenue
Andover, MN 55304
Raintree Realty, Inc.
11925 NE Hwy. *65
Blaine, MN 55434
, '\
'J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE 3 July 1990
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPR = FOR
AGEr~O~\
\
BY: I~
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion Planning/Zoning ~
ITEM 4. 13373 NW Lily Str. '~
'Wi-ont Yard Setback Variance BY: d I Arcy Bosell ~
The City Council is requested to consider the Variance Re~uest of
Woodland Development on behalf of Dan Sigmon to allow th~ add on
two (2') feet to their existing garage on the property located at
13373 NW Lily street.
The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed said request at their
regular meeting on June 12, 1990, and recommends denial of the
request.
Attached hereto are the Planning & Zoning Commission packet
materials, the minutes of their meeting, and a Resolution for
your consideration.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
\ TO
/
SECOND BY
~)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -90
A RESOLUTION DENYING THE VARIANCE REQUEST OF WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT
ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13373 NW LILY S~REET TO ENCROACH TWO
(2') FEET INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK.
WHEREAS, Woodland Development has requested a variance on
behalf of Dan Sigmon to encroach two (2') feet into the front
yard setback to allow for an addition onto the garage which was
inadvertently omitted at the time the house was constructed; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has reviewed the
request and has determined that said request does not meet the
criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04 in that no hardship
exists due to the unique shape or topography of the parcel and
that the property owner is not precluded reasonable use of said
property; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends to the
City Council denial of the request as it does not meet the
criteria of the Ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
city of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission and denies the Variance Request as
presented.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 3rd
day of July, 1990.
CITY OF A~DOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
o
~ ~ Regular Planning & Zoning Meeting
,~ Minutes--June 12, 1990
Page -9-
D. The applicant will include additional berms
and both deciduous and coniferous plantings on
the south and west sides of the property line
as part of the overall landscaping plan.
E. The applicant will not store any inoperable,
unlicensed or dismantled vehicles outside of the
proposed building.
F. The site plan will allow for required parking
facilities on the site.
G. This ~s subject to a yearly review by Staff.
Discussion included Ferris' objections to approving a new
building for this type of business in the Commercial Park.
vote on MOTION: Yes--Spotts, Peek, Vistad and Pease. No--
Ferris with explanation as follows:
1) I do not believe that the Special Use Permit
should be used to create a building. It should be used to
allow different uses within a building. I believe that when
granting a Special Use permit and placing special criteria on
it the City is not in a position to uphold the criteria when
extensive financial implications have been involved for the
developer or the owner in order to execute the special use
permit.
2) I also do not believe it is in the best interest
of the GB district or this particular industrial park.
Motion carried.
VARIANCE, WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT, FRONT YARD SETBACK, 13373
LILY STREET N.W.
Blake stated that this is a request by Woodland Development
for a two foot variance on a'home constructed by them for
Mr. and Mrs. Dan Sigmon at 13373 Lily Street N.W. Specifications
for the home when it was built was for the garage to be
22 x 22 feet. Unfortunately the garage was constructed at
20 x 22 feet. The Sigmon's have a large older car which is
difficult to house at the current size of the garage.
~
Woodland Development would like to construct a two foot
addition onto the existing garage structure to meet the terms
of the purchase agreement.
:)
Regular Planning & Zoning Meeting
Minutes--June 12, 1990
Page -10-
Ordinance 8 allows the City to grant the variance if it meets
the interpretation for unnecessary hardship. It is Staff's
recommendation that this variance does not cause unnecessary
hardship as it pertains to the interpretation of the zoning
ordinance.
MOTION by Peeks and seconded by Spotts that the Andover Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends denial for the variance requested
by Woodland Development per item B of the Planning commission's
memo in that the Commission finds that the proposal does not
meet the requirements set forth in the City's zoning Ordinance 8,
Section 5.04. The Commission finds that no hardship due to
the unique shape or topography of the parcel exists and that
the landowner would not be precluded reasonable use of the
property. Motion carried unanimously.
GENTHON PONDS ADDITION SKETCH PLAN
The Planning and Zoning Commission is requested to review
the proposed sketch plan of Genthon Ponds Addition. This
is a continuation of an item from a previous meeting.
Blake stated that the Andover Review Committee has reviewed
the sketch plans, and their comments are included with tonight's
packet. This development now proposes thirteen lots and will
not be a planned unit development.
After reviewing the sketch plan and comments by the Andover
Review Committee, the Planning and Zoning Commission made
the following comments:
1. University extension right of way should be
dedicated.
2. Avoid variances if at all possible.
3. The Commission is in concurence with the comments
by Staff. Staff will prepare these for the
City Council meeting on June 19, 1990.
KOBS, SKETCH PLAN, DISCUSSION
The Planning and zoning Commission is requested to review
the proposed sketch plan of Ken Kobs for the development of
nine lots each with a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres.
~
:)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
June 12, 1990
AGENDA ITEM
6. woodland Develop-
ment, Front Yard
Setback variance,
13373 Lily St.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
BY:
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
City Planner
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review the
request of Woodland Development to allow for the construction of
a two foot addition onto the front of a structure to within thirty
three (33) feet of the front property line on property described
as Lot 4, Block 6, Woodland Terrace, Second Addition.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance 8, Section 6.02 establishes a front yard setback for
structures of thirty-five (35) feet. Attached garages may
encroach to within six feet of the side yard if they are at least
440 square feet in size. The current side yard setback is ten
feet.
PLANNING REVIEW
The applicant proposes to construct a two foot addition onto the
existing garage structure to meet the terms of the purchase
agreement and allow for the storage of a very large vehicle. The
garage is currently 2 feet smaller than required by the owner.
See the attached letter from Woodland for further clarification.
The request would require a two foot variance.
The home was constructed in 1989 and meets all setback
requirements for the R-4 Zoning District. The Certificate of
Occupancy was issued on December 7, 1989. The property has some
oak trees scattered on the lot, however, no severe slopes,
wetlands or other physical barriers exist on the site.
Ordinance #8 allows the City to grant a variance to the
requirements of the zoning Ordinance if the strict interpretation
of the Ordinance will cause undue hardship to the property owner.
The Planning and Zoning Commission should review the request using
the following criteria:
.' "-
'" --./
~,)
Page 2
Woodland Development Variance
June 12, 1990
1. Does the strict interpretation of the Ordinance cause
practical difficulties and/or unnecessary hardships to the
property owners'?
The request is based on the incorrect construction of the
building. The applicant does not meet the terms of the purchase
agreement, as the garage is two feet smaller than requested by the
property owner. The hardship is not caused by the strict
interpretation of the zoning ordinance.
The proposal does not meet this criteria.
2. Is the hardship caused by the unique physical features of the
land, including shape or condition of the parcel?,
As mentioned before, the lot was part of the second addition of
woodland Terrace. The grading for the lot does not create any
severe slopes. In no way do the physical features of the lot
create the hardship to the owner.
The proposal does not meet this criteria.
3. Will the variance be detrimental to the public welfare?
The addition to the garage would not create a significant problem
for the welfare of the community, however, the front yard
encroachment is out of character with the surrounding properties.
Maintaining proper setbacks along road ways will protect the
aesthetics of a neighborhood by preventing overcrowding of
residences. A survey of surrounding properties has revealed that
the average setback along Lily street is roughly 38 feet, slightly
higher than required by the ordinance. Refer to the following
summary of setback information obtained from the Andover Building
Department:
House Setback
13310 Lily street 30 feet (Constructed when 30'
was standard)
13320 Lily street 41 feet
13333 Lily street 50 feet
13374 Lily street 35 feet
13386 Lily street 35 feet
13373 Lily Street 35 feet (Applicant)
, "-
'-J 13385 Lily street 35 feet
, \
~J
Page 3
Woodland Development Variance
June 12, 1990
Clearly the standard setback standards for this neighborhood are
greater than 35 feet and to allow the encroachment would not be in
the best interest of the surrounding property owners.
4. Is the variance necessary to allow the property owner the
reasonable use of the property?
The minimum garage size is 440 square feet for the R-4 zoning
district. The subject garage is exactly that - 440 square feet.
An alternative would be to expand the garage to the side to within
6' of the side lot line, as allowed by Ordinance 8. The garage
could be sized up to 20' by 26' and .would allow additional storage
space without encroaching on the front yard.
staff believes that reasonable use of the property is not
precluded with denial of the request.
PLANNING COMMISSION OPTIONS
A. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend
approval of the variance requested by Woodland Development to
allow a two foot addition onto the front of the existing
structure to within thirty-three feet of the front property
line, thereby requiring a two foot front yard setback variance
on property described as:
Lot 4, Block 6, Woodland Terrace, Second Addition
The Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the
minimum criteria established in Ordinance 8, Section 5.04
including: the strict interpretation of the ordinance causes
the hardship, the hardship stems from the unique shape,
topography or physical features of the land, the variance will
not be detrimental to the public welfare and the variance is
necessary for the reasonable use of the property.
B. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend
denial of the variance requested by Woodland Development to
allow a two foot addition onto the front of the existing
structure to within thirty-three feet of the front property
line, thereby requiring a two foot front yard setback variance
on property described as:
Lot 4, Block 6, Woodland Terrace, Second Addition
:J
The Commission finds that the proposal does not meet the
requirements set forth in the City's Zoning Ordinance #8,
Section 5.04. The Commission finds that no hardship due to
the unique shape or topography of the parcel does not exist
and that the land owner would not be precluded reasonable use
of the property.
/' '\
'-/
Page 4
Woodland Development Variance
June 12, 1990
C. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may table the item.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
staff recommends Option *2
<J
@
~)
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD. N.W,
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
Variance it
VARIANCE REQUEST FORM
Property Address
17)) lQ
L--i L,L-~ S -r
JJ.L0
Legal Description of Property:
(fill in whichever is appropriate)
Lot
'-f.
Block
tp
Addition
I .\ .~
\..NCOOLA-IJ 0 It~a-ttc~', Lf~O(I7(
Plat
Parcel
PIN
(If metes. and bounds, attach the complete legal)
Description of Request ::''t.'v
ATTrk-rt '<- u
Specific Hardship b.'t-t
ATTAL-rtccD
Current Zoning
~-4-
Section of Ordinance
**********************************************************************
Name of Applicant
Address '?;?-O
\ UDu 0 LJ\-tJ [) D'C-Urc.LD f ,'\.tZ-JJ r
~_0. {'1y\i'rt.0 ~::;\t'C,"-c-r
Home PhOnej _flusiness .hone _*~ 1- '7:C6~
Signature '~'I!'i'.Dltl t~tQ/......-c_ Date ~-::z~ CZ0
*************~*******************************************************
Property Owner (fee Owner)
(If different from above)
D-A-..J ..s I h/VI v,--J
,
Home Phone
<-t2 7-'-1 S ,/3
Signature ~11\ ~, J"\~ Date /)23,1'190
************************~******************************* ************
13373
L/ 2- (- c 117
LI L- y
sT
,IV ~v
Address
Business Phone
" )
Attach a scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent
streets; and location and use of existing structures within 100 feet..
~a:nes~ ?d~~es. o~l prol?'e-r..ty own~ wi th~50 f~ o~ the
subJ~op~mus~o b~v1de~
;:,-,'1:'. -
Application Fee: Single Family - $40.00; Other Requests - $65.00
filing Fee:
$10.00
Da te paidS~5'-90 Receipt it -.:f1-7-16
~)
':_-J
ATTACHMENT
TO VARIANCE REQUEST FORM
Description of Request
We are requesting a variance in the setback requirement of 35 feet from the
property line in order to put a two foot addition on the presently built
garage. The purpose of this request is that the Sigmon family purchased
from us a new residence with a 22 x 22 foot garage. Unfortunately during
the construction period the garage was not built to specifications and was
two feet short. It is currently 20 x 22 feet, .
Specific Hardship
We feel there is undue hardship caused to the homeowner because of an
error made during the building process by us as the contractor, We also
feel there is a hardship there because of the current size of the garage,
the family is unable to utilize the garage for storage of their very large
vehicle.
jh
830 West Main Street
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
(612) 427-7500
FAX: (612) 427-0192
I t t I 'I I I , , I
f 1 I I 'I . , I 1 f
I I I I f I' : I I I I
, I 'I. - r-~.'*tI~I'r ., r---:~ \-.,...-', I c...\~ ~~,-'--' ....,:.. i . ~L:- f--f-- : ~:, 1
: _ ,.-- "'- I '. ~- . I .'. I- ',..', I I
',' ___ I . .. '" -., . ~ ~ :J~ ' .. ,. -...Jj.",. . . , I
.. _ I. -;-rTn~nr=~- T'~.~', ': . _~..~ .. --=C=--I-m ~V,:'.: -';': ..~~..J.Y ----r-. TT (
'p\ I i: i"\~~---~ Ihf~";;'.'~ "[Jr!F LT::!~ II~ ' ! ~\
\ l-J:: '----; ~ ----11_1__11 : II ~ N~-r-;- I '':''1.1' '6' ~~ IYn-,':,--n !-- ':, ...;... r:j--- ...L &'~:"I ~- ((;liJ2i~4;
) (.m.... ! n\ !! ~ e:-n r ~I · . ..,., / 1 ~~",~!i)J)
f-ji"- :: I 'IV 'I I I! f:1 -:-- I ~ Hilll i /:-:r.: (~ 11ill: :"- ~
'- ., r!.- ....U~.,_' ' ",j I ~~ I .~. .....- i \ I I
\ ~ · Z --- ,_m, .!. " \, ,----~:' -J-'''''' -, ---- ~----
~1:' ' . '~f :'.. !; I:; -~ ~ I '" L,_::'~. - - .~,~..,~ ---~---- I' : i
I .... rr', ... ! . I? 'I . ~' / I ~:: ,. ,..- : I
I . '.',: I "'. ,i } If I }: <\ : 1').. . I --- I I l
, ~trm 8--- i . ---r---i i... . -~~,~.~.-, I l -T?'T ---I - - ~ I i ~; ..' , --- r--
:.. I '! / "Tl ~:: ! . . ~:l h-! i1 cc -( ;:J A ,-- F-.-' rrlJ.Rt
~--~-- ~: ---1/1-;--[....,.. .1'1 ~ ; ---BI f- ~HI-~.jn}-O ----, j ,.:~.,,;; '3 ~ ----,......+........ jJh~;1 ~I:~',: I!~:'
. I I :1; -:", I~ ~I.. 'Inl :... 7'1.j'.}"'11 I :/\...:;:;' '''''-'1.
, , :,' .[.: I ~ r. II'. I I I .. c , .,....==." I! ; \ - I I
Y.': ~:"T~'./'-~ ~ 3~ ~~ I -"'~. --~, L~~ 1=..111 n
. :'.~ I :. '.:',;-:.:~;f: ~.u' , I 9~ / ~,itl I'D' . ~~:~ ~
I':' '~_:7' . :~:~~~ ---fL=j~I--- -t.-~~.. -;- :ITP.-}~ --- ---- ----",-- '. :~-~: - i ld I----~
, . ',:~ .... _ . . . .': ~'~~~.~, _ :. i=t ~! ;I~ .( ,-. . I- l;
~r~: H. l,,~1'" ...,' 1:1.1 ;~~~ I I,. CsJ' 'll-Hi I 1 I I : '-r-~ .1' t' ";~::'.'I~II
~Il . 4.., . .:. ': ::;\t. I __~ ~~ I m_ _ i (";-f- ' [,...\'W .
11=1.."':'~',)H."'.,,.,,<,..t:., :~:'f;~i! /<1 'I T l' r+-f- I'. - 'e .
lJr=\f....:.. ;- ",::y...,!i~ t '~~""':"I/ ~ r I ,. .
'I' ,0\1. : : .' . r:'1'. ,\,Ui~ ';'0',,". i ~ (- I l.'f ' ..""
il'~.~~ b.~~.If-~.I~~~,:I:I'i ~7f::= i 1----1 I ~. ....h..-.- ~L-.~~\i ~~~\
i'J~ r q:-:'~ I H-i :~.ci=,~ L:_1J '''''' >--- r . f---,-, . l' 1. - - ! ff1M ~
!j_~.~_.jl' i-i~g :i~F i~~~:' .~ / ffilm-~~-1Tm---r---1 ~\.... I \ if{i~!fY. --1 ~~~
1~ I,'r . I rj...t-. ~;~ 11 .....:.JI " .,:.. . '_'~_' _J~ ; ." I'W- ,!~~ I ~~-~.
..R--';i~. ~,=:Fi ""',:. i~ "~.'l.'. . I 1'\ -: Ihr..I:;h.:..u' fll--;-~Ft.(({~;tj/-~ .' '-" : o!J
,~ , ,:, ,I' I I \ I I~Lldjl' R .b.);.':' ""',:"~' :
'H' ,... ,. . '3 , .~'" .', H1r; m_-:_____. : it1f:U:J, 7QIL '-l ..~ ~"2 . " ~';:~.~p' , .,
~ L' , , _' : I,. _~ ..:u :! . ....'~.. ;!: l(, 't.~&)' '. i
",' ~ <-.'. '.,.....;h <. n. I I IIIH l.t==::- . ...\ii~..'~. ::)lC ...:"
,'fL-.. II,"., 1]11 , .," .. ,--- I . e. ". '., '~kt ' ~ ~ "-I~
ff i I ':'1 I ~'I~ I ,',',,::, I, ':;~r);'~ ~-~
1 . '. i .:;::;~..'..'~-i~h /, '. ' '"'',' I '-1 :!,1l:J1~: '-.--- ,.,.
~."~\--1::fH- · .~J.lrX..1 ~' ~~'~"'-~ 1-'-'-11' ;----','''' ~.-;.:.---
I,.', '-..Ii !iitr8;'S ~ '""1~_ L~"-' :. I .' ',P i '5!'"
L~ ~. -'_' .~. . I _ '. ""ffi " I!! ~, 'f..'. ,I I "
~; if"}...'.',...;" ..JY"I' ; LrEi .', I .ttl~"..:J'n,\",:J.: I J-Ff-';~71 I '
. .l I '/) ~:' ~l:. ."!V"'.jB:'.!Hl:.: ':-:':"'1. '
'(, :: I , ~t' .. .11)'1:,,-::-.. ..'-<~ '_..j;":";', "-t.:1r '
1-----,. ..-r..,. ' . -j '---~' ", r.t......' . ~. ":;\'~~.I----1~f 5.ig,;:r-". '-t-".. ..., ! ----
! I i -q I 'i':'~ IS~""r=i'.~it:H~~'~~~ ,.~
~'4~ :- : y,i!I:IJ111:1"'!ill)~Gl.i\~_:LI,,::W 'C- ,.I-".~~' -
( ~.1..."1 IJ.:..'. ! : "'II.I:"I""}I~.-'~~~.. :~:i~y/ .~~=.'f ';'.c.c-:l,;M
- - ~~,' ----1----,---- ~ '.. ,~~-J/ .J.\' .l:."'ii ~"....,,-:,,
, . ::" H}-,-lH'---1".:i 'r -8- '::0: .~, >>Si'
b,I:'+' :: . ",.11-., ~~))/~
\ U-U I f t~ I II rg ~.
, ___1._ .!=1--1' ____ ____ ____ I I I J . l. ))
'-' I : 'il !Al
, ~ I/I~
<< ~O,",".O; ,i ----r' -,~. ~ .,_~~. :(fr ~ ~
,~ (It' ~/ .......il~>-.
'= \\ i : r)t. JC_..~ l'
'= --"
",_I
~,)
l,
,.
II ~',:
I . ,
i i ; iI
a. ,~!ji
ffi c( i~~!
> == illl
o I
Cl~.: I
II. z ,--I
o <t -
~ l.J...O
::l: 0...'......
~I..nu I
~~ (,.
81......i"
U nnn
11111 '
lUll
...1......
IlIun "
'!
1111 Hakanson
Anderson
1 Assoc.,lnc.
Certificate of Survey
, )
-'-_./
(n5~".S~&.lM>dJ<",peN(hIIl!'Clt
Z U Mon.oe S"t':O!1.^I'ok... Mr...."Ul'.. 55]0) ,
bI2.l'17.5860
Survey for: Woodland Development
OESCRI PTlON:
Lot 4, Block 6.
WOODLAND TERRACE fOURTH AOOI TI 0'1,
Anoka County, MInnesota.
8ENOI I(J "IZK:
Top OF rJlE 5our.l/WcSrrJ?LY
PR"PC~TY ~d~rlE~ I~ol'l
of 71-1/$ J.Or.
.ElC'VATION: 877./4
~
~g
1--:"-
,,,,
~~
II)
~
Proposed lowest floor elevatfon: 873.4
Proposed walkout floor elevation: 878.3
Prcposed garage floor elevation: 881.0
Proposed top of found~t1an elevation: 881.4
~
--~
.
,
'"
~
'"
~
9'7~.1
/(@D
--
D~NoTe$ Z .".,3 rING GqCVNO ~I.CVlfrIDN
OC"'(Jr~3 p('tJ'<?O.$ro Gltt!lUNO ~LC"'ArltJN
DL"cr~.s PII;'OPtJ.j,O OIlAll'(Atll P;,rT'~"'"
S~c._T.
It
I!LVH~: ~7/f" /"7~"'SL/IrE /N-Puc~ LD~A rttlN
0'" 5Xlsrlll/i: }lovJ4- ('#"<#'~"NrAL ONLY)
I hereby certtfy th~t this survey. plan or report WM prepared by
me or under my direct 5upervlslon Md th.i\11 ^m "' duly Regl5-
tered ~nd Surveyor under the I"INS of the State of Mlnnesot.:\
cYc;--/7J.dfdv /2263
9/;3/tf&'1 844.2' ,,' No
D/llt lob No
)
1
Sc"le
o Ol!'no'~' Iron Monument
Book
("" 30'
l!25
r...ge
7.3-75
:)
.,
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
3 July 1990
DATE
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
NO.. . ~
D~scuss~on Planning/Zoning
ITEM 5. 2261 NW l39th Ave. ,(\f
NO, Dunn Side Yard Variance BY: d I Arcy Bosell }\
The City Council is requested to consider the Variance R
Lyle R. Dunn to allow for the construction of an accessory
structure to within three (3') feet of the side yard of his
property described as Lot 4, Block 2, Red Oaks Manor Second
Addition (property'address: 2261 NW 139th Avenue).
of
The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed said request at their
regular meeting on June 12, 1990, and recommends denial of the
request.
Attached hereto are the Planning & Zoning Commission packet
materials, the minutes of their meeting, and a Resolution for
your consideration.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
~J TO
/ "
'---./)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -90
A RESOLUTION DENYING THE VARIANCE REQUEST OF LYLE R. DUNN ON THE
PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOT 4, BLOCK 2, RED OAKS MANOR SECOND
ADDITION, TO ERECT AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO WITHIN THREE (3')
FEET OF THE SIDE YARD.
WHEREAS, Lyle Dunn has requested a variance to allow for the
erection of an accessory structure to within three (3') feet of
the side yard of his property; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & zoning Commission has reviewed t~e
request. and has determined that said request does not ~eet the
criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04 in that no hardship
exists due to the unique shape or topography of the property
which would preclude the property owner having reasonable use of
his property; and
WHEREAS, there was no public input received either in support
or against this request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & zoning Commission recommends to the
City Council denial of this variance request as it does not meet
the criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission and hereby denies the request of
Lyle R. Dunn to erect an accessory structure to within three (3')
feet of the side yard property line.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 3rd
day of July, 1990.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling, Mayor
Victoria volk, City Clerk
~J
~J
Regular Planning & Zoning Meeting
Minutes--June J2, 1990
Page -5-
4. The owner of the property maintains a right of
30 day notice to have the sign removed.
5. The sign is not to be lit.
6. The maintenance of the sign and area would have to
be in the form of a written agreement approved by
the City staff.
7. The sign shall not be within ten feet of any
property line.
8. The Special Use Permit is subject to significant
progress being made within one year, or this
permit becomes null and void.
9. The Special Use Permit is subject to a one year
review.
Motion carried unanimously,
VARIANCE, LYLE DUNN, SIDE YARD SETBACK, 2261 - 139TH AVENUE N.W.
Blake stated that this is a request of Lyle Dunn to allow
for the construction of an accessory structure to within three
feet of the side yard on his property described as Lot 4,
Block 2, Red Oaks Manor, Second Addition.
Under Section 6.02 of Ordinance 8 a side yard setback for
accessory structures is ten feet. Attached garages may encroach
to within six feet if they are at least 440 square feet in
size. The applicant is proposing to construct a 660 square
~oot garage in the rear yard of the ~property. The proposed
setback is three feet from the existing side property~ line,
requiring a seven foot variance from the side yard setback
requirement.
Blake stated that back in approximately 1967, a narrow wedge
piece of property was shifted to the adjoining lot of the
Dunn property because the house on the adjoining lot was mistakenly
built too close to the property line. This left the Dunn
property with a slightly narrower backyard.
~J
Although there is a steep slope from the rear of the house
to the level area where the garage is proposed to be located,
Staff does not feel there are physical features on the property
that would preclude the owner from constructing the building
an additional seven feet to the west to meet requirements.
~)
Regular Planning & zoning Meeting
Minutes--June 12, 1990
Page -6-
Also, staff does not feel the variance is necessary to allow
the property owner the reasonable use of the property.
Mr. Dunn stated the grade of the driveway would be affected
if the garage is to be set further to the west because of
the sloping factor.
It is Staff's opinion that the request does not meet the
hardship requirements as set forth in the City's Zoning Ordin~nce
and recommends denial of this requ8st.
MOTION by Vistad and seconded by Spotts that the Andover Planning
and Zoning Commission recommend to the Andover City Council
denial of the variance requested by Lyle Dunn to allow the
construction of an accessory structure to within three feet
of side yard, therefore requiring a seven foot side yard variance
on the property described as Lot 4, Block 2, Red Oaks Manor,
Second Addition. The proposal does not meet the requirements
set forth in the City's Zoning Ordinance 8, Section 5.04.
The Commission finds that no hardship exists due to the unique
shape or topography of the property that would preclude the
owner from reasonable use of his property.
The variance would not have a significant negative impact
on the public welfare, however no justification to grant the
variance exists on the property.
The request for an accessory building is reasonable, however
the location does cause some difficulty because there is nothing
in the lay of the land to prevent locating the building another
seven feet to the west to meet the setback requirements.
No hardship is created by requiring the structure to meet
setback requirements.
Motion carried unanimously.
!
PUBLIC HEARING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, BLUELINE COLLISION, REPAIR
BUSINESS IN GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, 2352 - 136TH AVENUE N.W.
~\
'J
This is a request for a Special Use Permit to allow the operation
of a repair garage in Andover's Commercial Park. The owner,
Ric Haugland, is awaiting approval from the City on this location
in order to secure Small Business Administration funding for
the project. Mr. Haugland has also appeared before the Economic
Development Committee to review the plans. They have recommended
the Special Use Permit be obtained prior to the City selling
the property to the applicant.
:J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
June 12, 1990
AGENDA ITEM
7. Lyle Dunn, Side
Yard Setback Vari-
ance, 2261 - 139th
Avenue NW
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
p~anning ~
BY: Jay Blake,~city planner
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review the
request of Lyle Dunn to allow for the construction of an
accessory structure to within three (3) feet of the side yard
on property described as Lot 4, Block 2, Red Oaks Manor,
Second Addition.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordin~nce 8, Section 6.02 establishes a side yard setback
for accessory structures of ten (10) feet. Attached garages may
encroach to within six feet if they are at least 440 square feet
in size. The rear yard setback is 30 feet.
PLANNING REVIEW
The applicant proposes to construct a 660 foot garage/accessory
structure in the rear yard of the property. The proposed setback
is three feet from the existing side property line, requiring a
seven foot variance from the side yard setback requirement. The
original side yard property line was shifted, in order to add
property to Lot 5, Block 2 (the neighbor to the east).
A steep slope exists from roughly the rear of the home to the
level area where the garage is proposed to be located.
A small portion of the original property was transferred to Lot 5,
Block 2 and has reduced the usable rear yard area for the
applicant's property. The effect of this transfer on the proposal
is minimal, as the transferred property does not make the
applicant's parcel a non-conforming parcel with regards to area or
lot width.
\
'-~
Ordinance #8 allows the City to grant a variance to the
requirements of the zoning Ordinance if the strict interpretation
of the Ordinance will cause undue hardship to the property owner.
The Planning and zoning Commission should review the request using
the following criteria:
:J
Page 2
Dunn Variance
June 12, 1990
1. Does the strict interpretation of the Ordinance cause
practical difficulties and/or unnecessary hardships to the
property owners?
The request for an accessory structure is reasonable, however, the
location does cause some difficulty. The applicant has stated
that he did not want to locate the structure in the middle of the
rear yard, thereby reducing the usable space on the property. No
hardship is created by requiring the structure to meet setback
requirements.
Also, according to Building Department records, the current use
has existed for more than 20 years without the accessory
structure and reasonable use of the site has not been precluded.
2. Is the hardship caused by the unique physical features of the
land, including shape or condition of the parcel?
There are no physical features on the property that would preclude
the owner from moving the building seven feet to the west and
thereby meeting the setback requirements. The shape of the
parcel, while it has been altered by the transfer of land to the
neighbor, does not have a unique shape.
3. Will the variance be detrimental to the public welfare?
The variance would not have a significant negative impact on the
welfare of the public, however, no justification to grant the
variance exists on the property.
4. Is the variance necessary to allow the property owner the
reasonable use of the property?
This criteria is not met by the proposal.
PLANNING COMMISSION OPTIONS
A. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend
approval of the variance requested by Lyle Dunn to allow the
construction of an accessory structure to within three feet
of the side yard, thereby requiring a seven foot side yard
set back variance on property described as:
Lot 4, Block 2, Red Oaks Manor, Second Addition
:J
The Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the
minimum criteria established in Ordinance 8, Section 5.04
including: the strict interpretation of the ordinance causes
the hardship, the hardship stems from the unique shape,
topography or physical features of the land, the variance will
not be detrimental to the public welfare and the variance is
necessary for the reasonable use of the property.
~~)
Page 3
Dunn Variance
June 12, 1990
B. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend
denial of the variance requested by Lyle Dunn to allow the
construction of an accessory structure to within three feet of
the side yard, thereby requiring a seven foot side yard set
back variance on property described as:
Lot 4, Block 2, Red Oaks Manor, Second Addition
The Commission finds that the proposal does not meet the
requirements set forth in the City's Zoning Ordinance ~8,
Section 5.04. The Commission finds that no hardship due to
the unique shape or topography of the parcel does not exist
and that the land owner would not be precluded reasonable use
of the property.
C. The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Option ~2
~)
@
~J
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD. N.W.
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
" '.\ ~ .. II 'j .." U.'
!...~9 =-~~_~._ tl ~: ~
,nl l
j ~ i'.'i/412 1 1990 I' ,
Variance it
FORM
VARIAN
Property Address
~0 r - /39'f<- 4Je d;)
~~ $'S-.3o~
Legal Description of Property:
(fill in whichever is appropriate)
L{
plat (;8/00; Parcel
6-d 0o..L ~ ;;!JddJJ;t
R..3 c.( :3 Z ..2L( :;l;) 0037
Lot
Block
Jl-
4~
PIN
Addi tion
(If metes and bounds~ attach the complete legal)
Description of Request Wa:.-J- ()~ ~ (Ofeof- sJ- ~ ~
~ Foot ~. to..d
Specific Hardship h~ o...2JLuJ..fJj
ar~
~DJ- a.boJ
Q,,\ !? 081 II. {)
section of Ordinance h, 'Ox
Current Zoning
**********************************************************************
Name of Applicant :/;, DtAd,J
Address ~ (-13q AJE RJvJ
Home Phone
c; ~'\ -S/3/h
Date S'"a7/90
l I
*****************************************************
Signature
Address
HO,m~-\ p.hone
Signature
Business Phone
Date
**********************************************************************
Attach a scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard bui~ding setbacks; adjacent
streets~ation and use of existing str~c~ure~ within :00 feet.
: '~T~~ames and addresses of all property owner~.within 350 feet of the
\.J l'subject property must also be provided. ., ,,'
'j(Application
~Filing Fee:
fee: Single Family - $40.00; Other Requests - $65.00
00,~ Date Paid _-)<-?l.;:J-9C Receipt it !')-<f07-5/
n~rc indati.UJ.
. , I 1 I . I I
, I I I I , , 1
I I I I I I I I I
/ \ \ Ii : ~:iI'~~\l{I.I.:4'l1,-- i1--~dy~'-< . ! (1 r~I"~=~~~'::: ;L;==.:' :: 1:Y ----1---~.; ~ 1
:J I II . 'II' \:ll :~1Qli -.:.,,~~ ---:.1;-1..~ ~i~;i~~ ~NF__~" ,-, ~';-~~; , ,~
iJ-~=~----t[\ -Il-J I i ~:~~h1 TI~~TnLJr:&"~~~ 71 T'~::.jli9;vf
-iil'" 'I ,\) 'I I. li'I--;-r=--~~ I'h- ~I:til'll : .~g ':.1:: c~ i ,:?I~
1 I , : I r . !f-- ,,,w,,: ::'7, ~J mL ~, 7:,~~:]: ~j ___~ ----1-- I t:_L_~
:,;,~,CJ... . i /7 ----i--- i - ,/ ' 1 : " \ \'l.. i : J '.' ~>= -: ~. : i
If. ~~, I I: i _ i ~ I ,/;. I ~ I I ~ 1
Ir- ':... ~I"f~ ," '" , I ;, ~-7-r" ~"..,. n_-_ ---r---- .:
, I~ i~=~ ___.~--.--i I i <--11---- ' --~--~i\.' ___~____::'..., ,-- : I --- L--
- .., I' j', i!' , I I ., ' .,.. ,
I i ~ i I f.- .J I ! I : . ct....... _ \ i / I : ; __I_i_ ' ..,. ! _
~ i - ~i ILJIJ~' I ~---- __J1Udh~t ---- .1 It- 1____I_:,:..mL~m..~,ltf-f:-~~
---j-- -, ", I l .:,' ~ I Ft hi---' ~I 'I ~ 1 ,#-I.:-e..... I i 1.fl" f.: I"'
I I "". I ~ , I . I::: " A. .. ..,
I I ~l'i:::' .-- "-I ,. 'I n L ~ J U . ~ -. . I : ('- . . 0:0,. . .
! : u ./: _ I 71' II' 1 I' "~'- .'''''.....' ___I ; 1
I' '.:. .."...,:.': :". .,.. .~ ../' I ~ ~:.. =:3..e:;~. jOO~' I ~ I ~Jfr U ii
. ,., .~~~:: . "y:..m . = --,,_ .- i: '.' l 4
.C. :.:..J'. ."",~,,;~"'~'~-':&__ ~~I--- -~-- ;;;:..;.;,.:- ---'" '---- ---- ____L_ -- ' ----"
1,;.,.1:.'-,..., '" '-;~7:-:~~::. I I- "",,; ~":N I ,: '<. l.d I
"'r"' -.~ .,......... . '! :I~ '
~frd:,.:'..: .H'l~~.'I..I'I'il I ;fk', '3; il'.:.\ I i h- I p~1
~!! .t~: . ,.''U'; il .~I~ L I I i (,..;. t ,- -
!)~:~ :':;it~~~'t',;;;~r --- tt~~~i.I/('- i \---- - 1 J rl~ i-J1 - -,
~J.~ ~': . ".-: '-!'~ :";v"'\''',.'. ..... ,.- ';.'\:~.t. '.. ,____ /--...... ..___
'lt7';~ .~.~~ 1~1:~;cJ~~ 1// LJ-_LI_J____H 20 ~~~~v._j
Ii ~ i! l":rtjL ;~~</::,~.l-'-i EBlI: I l.: W I L ~~. " } if01 ,:5Y T :
if- I': I , 1-'11 ';ji':-jHH it- ~. I- " . -. r\\f. !"'\\ '
Ir-_:i .;~ .,: ,\<ji ~J. \: ltb-YQ~-;-~ :~j;{.:~ ----".."" ~ I :
r ~~I. ~~I,'i~, : ~:~ ----~--.-- l; ~~JLw~~~ ~ ~ '~,~ ~ ~:~
:Ili I I. t~l ;,t1 I ~. 1.1 .,' - ___ . ....::..~ '~l~ CIt ..., --:
~"'---: I ," I I ~~ $~ 1 11L:",:', I' <~ "". ~. . ,-~
~~\ L_J.'ji:',., ~.:r" ;j,lttS~fj!: /(,1 ,~~~:',:~', I r ,.~1:r~1[: --B: '~;',
-.-. - r- - - ~r.. . r%.. ~ . ..,--~- 'TO' , ...
,.'; i! SlI." .. ,'~:~~h. ..,"':~, i '-P : ---
~!;:.. '~~J,ii:n'i:,:.dD i , I :tl~.. " ! ! r-lY,,::;-- ,,! :
11,.:.0))....1..., /1' I' .1,..: ..,~::;~~~ r ,I ~'Jl I
t:jj fI ' , ____I -,'it~." .;.-",::,7';:r-~ '--i-' ..,..,
-----, (".. ' , i -e,-~~,d-"". " '~"."':.r.' .,~i"".~~---T ":'1t - .."" ..
, I~!' "I' . v +fjJ,; '''}=j.''.. ~ .I~~ :!T,.--'. C
! : .: .:. I. . :0::.' I I rbt'-.J!! - - .. ..'. _ _ ~
~ 'r-:b :- : '<<.I'J.I,t."!I~:'. ;;i~.... "J.'I,,::f.! :.5 1~:-1 ."f-r~;'
~,,,. , , I.I:~_... . . ..-h: .~ ..
7-.;',;. : ' ,-111.,:"';'\"",... .':-;-'.:~~.I!)'I/ ,<.~\~. ...... .:OIl':.t,!Y;
n ,~- .." ----7----,----. ~'.:.f.i~~)/ "':\\IX:"~' ~,"_.,-:"
. -=:IT" : : Ii: HHH.C ,---,-",.'iiV( "=" ~l~ ~jif..,'
1'1 - ~I : : .... II ~~~}~
~ LrU I D~"' I/"':ili\\ ". ..
___L 3-11 -___ ----t---- .I!' L'.
: l:=! /:IJB:
,,~~ ! ----r ytl~~:'~.~'!/ .~.
\\ I _ Ii
~ -
l"-1
\llI~,~
." '.
--
-~:J
I.
..
! II ~ I:
I ~!,
a. ll:q
I! ~ jI
""
e] <C IJd
>:IE 1111
o I
Cl~,: I
... Z '- i
;~O
::;: 01..1.. r-,...,..
~UIIII s
~ CJ~ ,...... ~l' 'i
U lUlU
011111 .
l1ill
...1......
.IIUII .
,r-"
~
:1
;~!r(r:3q -:;{-<f -,,:{.:;J, - C/C/:37
.)
'J
~
@
> ",5'
'O'l~..
\
\ J
?.""4 .~ r
~,.#
.
,
J'..ofII" If.
, ,
1\
:7J(J
~
"":;::>
'-'
j=-. ,
..
~u
I~
I
,\'X
-"'"File No, d. '77 c, I-!
(J
:_)
~
J\
~\
N
d. ;), r; / -
1 /o-CCo~ I D ~
Q~ <()Z)
Exhibit A
f tf;-40f
"'-.,
~,
--......
'~,
..............
'9!/ ~
~ '.........
. '1J, '<-< '-..r
\
/::0
" ~,..,
.,
f
I
I
I
~ I I
II /
II~ I
1/ "
I .
. I
I i 1f1-(}f7,,~d
!' S<L~4 cr-
Ii I '~
I .
,11
t ,
'I r
It $;)'
i ! 103'
/37'i-J-. /'iU E.. Ill. !U.
1..0 -;- L{
Q liJct...J.
I
-<a-f S-
810 c/c.' ~
ffO~~'d h
Cin ac'....
to! s: 8/tLk 2
"We herr.lJy certify that ':;P. ha'Je made an in,;pection of the property herr.:n df'scflbed, and that tills plat shrll'is 111<':
IOcatlOll of i~1(: IlTfprovernentc thereon, anrl that th'~re arp :;0 cn:rCyhrr~f:~~ IJI~k'; inrllcatf~d tllereOfl. H1:s plat alI(I
r.,'rtiflr.ale arr. for rr.:Jrt;~a:~': plliprJces only"
I
I
,'J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
July 3, 1990
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Engineering
~
ITEM
NO,
6. Park Dedication Fee /
BY:
Lot S li
The city Council is requested to review the attached proposed
subdivision ordinance amendment pertaining to park dedication as
prepared by the City Attorney.
Jeff Kieffer will also be at the meeting to discuss this item with
the City Council.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
"
'J TO
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 9.07.10 OF ORDINANCE NO. 10 TO
PROVIDE FOR PARK DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW
DEVELOPMENTS.
The City Council of the City of Andover does hereby
ordain: .
Section 1.
Section 9.07.10 entitled Dedicated Land,
Minimum Area, is amended to read as follows:
9.07.10 Dedicated Land, Minimum Area. Developers of
land within the City of Andover shall be required to dedicate to
the City for park, open space and playground purposes as a
minimum that percentage of gross land area as set out below:
a. Residential
Dwelling Units/Acre
(Gross Density)
Requirement
0-3
10%
Over 3
Add two ( 2 % ) percent to
dedication requirements
for each additional
dwelling unit over three
(3) units per gross
density.
b. Commercial-Industrial
(100, 8/07/79)
10%
,-J
Notwithstanding the foregoing for all subdivisions by
metes and bounds description the subdivider or developer may
elect to pay in lieu of the above mentioned park dedication
requirements the sum of Four Hundred and nol100 ($400.00)
Dollars for each dwelling unit that could be constructed upon
the proposed subdivided property. In the event that developer
elects to pay said Four Hundred and no/100 ($400.00) Dollars
charge, the City may collect additional park fees in the event
developer re-subdivides the property in the future. Such future
park fees shall be based upon the percentage schedule set out
herein; however, developer shall receive a credit for the per
unit charge paid previously.
-1-
r ')
'-~
:J
Section 2.
Effective Date of Ordinance.
This
ordinance shall take effect and be in full force after its
passage and publication.
Adopted this
ATTEST:
day of
,19_
Mayor
Clerk
-2-
:,)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
July 3, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Staff, Committee, Comm.
ITEM Carpet Replacement, Con .
NO.
7.
ORIGINATING DEPARTM~N;o.
Building ~/
BY: Dave Almgren
This item was continued from the June 19th Council meeting so
that we could determine where the funds would come from to have
the carpeting replaced.
Under 41940, City Hall Building, the following funds are
available:
217 Heating Fuel
$
446.13
223 Repair/Maint.Supp-Bldg.
500.00
402 Repari/Mtc.Labor-Bldg. 300.00
$ 1,246.13
COUNCIL ACTION
"
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'~J
CJ
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
July 3, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Staff, Committee,
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO, 8. Award Bid/
Ba
BY:
Frank stone
~
Public Works
Bids were received and opened at 10:00 A.M., June 22, 1990 at City
Hall.
Bid specifications were for acceptable models; Case 580k, Ford
555C, JCB 1400-B, John Deere 310C, or approved equals.
Dealers agreed that all above models were equal before specs were
sent out.
In addition to the basic backhoe loader four options were
considered:
A. 24" tapered sand bucket, no teeth.
B. Multi-purpose (four-in-one clam type bucket) with 1 yard
capacity. Also equipped with two (2) flip over style
construction forks. Hydraulic controls as needed.
C. 18" V frost bucket.
D. Extended warranty, 5-year, 5,000 hour power train warranty.
List of bidders; basic tractor loader prices and option prices:
J.I. Case Co.
Basic Unit
Option A
Option B
Option C
Option D
TOTAL PACKAGE
$35,020.00
$ 621. 00
$ 3,100.00
$1,110.00
$1,480.00
$41,,331. 00
(continued)
MOTION BY
,J TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
::J
Page Two
July 3, 1990
Long Lake Ford
Basic Unit
Opti on A
Option B
Opti on C
Opti on D
TOTAL PACKAGE
L-Z Company
Basic Unit
Option A
Option B
Option C
Option D (3-yr,
3,600 hrs)
TOTAL PACKAGE
Lano Equipment
Basic Unit
Option A
Option B
Option C
Option D
TOTAL PACKAGE
Lake state Equipment
Basic Unit
Option A
Option B
Option C
Option D
TOTAL PACKAGE
$36,788.00
$ 740.00
$ 1,797.00
$ 970.00
$ 1,450.00
$41,745.00
$36,870.00
$ 625.00
$ 3,386.00
$ 1,150.00
$ 850.00
$42,881. 50
$37,706.00
$ 1,600.00
$ 1,500.00
$ 1,275.00
$ 1,500.00
$43,581. 00
$37,150.00
$ 1,200.00
$ 2,105.00
$ 2,400.00
$ 1,450.00
$44,302.00
J.I. Case is low bid for basic unit and low bid with all the
options totalled.
Case Power Equipment has served the City well in the past and I
feel they will this time.
Option B-1 feel we probably don't need at this time. The
regular bucket that comes with the machine will be fine.
(continued)
'\
,j
::J
Page Three
July 3, 1990
The total package I would recommend is:
One Case 580-K Tractor Backhoe Loader
Option A, 24" tapered sandbucket, no teeth
Option C, 18" V Frost Bucket
Option D,S-year, 5,000 hrs. warranty
TOTAL PACKAGE
Also, a radio from Motorola
GRAND TOTAL
$35,020.00
$ 621. 00
$ 1,110.00
$ 1,480.00
$38,231. 00
$
921. 00
$39,152.00
We have $50,000 budgeted in Water Distribution Budget for 1990.
"-
)
/'\
'--./
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
July 3, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee,
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.9. Approve 1990 CDBG
Sub ran tee A r
BY:
BY:
Engineering
The City Council is requested to approve the Anoka County
Development Block Grant Program Agreement between Anoka County, a
political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, and the City of
Andover.
Enclosure: Agreement
Andover's project
MOTION BY
"
,,_~ TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
()
.
' ~ x_.
COUNTY
OF
ANOKA
Urban Anoka County Community Development Block Grant
COURTHOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760
June 21, 1990
---~ ~ [""" l< ;;"'.0 ""
~' \. If j tJ "" ,; .
'....J. J.;.... ",;". .'."." . ~ ~ 1:1 1[.1'.
in r~"-~"--'-l. '
lJ \,,\.;/,122 1990 I
I
. Mr. Jay Blake, Planner
City of Andover
Community Center
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N,W.
Andover, Minnesota 55304
CITY OF ANDOVER
Dear Jay:
I am forwarding three copies of your 1990 CDBG subgrantee Agreement. Please return all
three copies after execution by the appropriate party. I will return one fully executed copy to
you after our attorney approves the Agreement.
Please return the complete executed agreements as soon as possible since we need the
documents on file in order to release funds to your agency.
Thank you for your cooperation, You can reach me at 421-4760, extension 1178, with any
questions,
Sincerely,
9L-
JoAnn 0, Wright
Community Development Manager
JOW:sw
'-)
Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer
'<D:ll.>1
~J
\
'-~
ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
AGREEMENT
between
ANOKA COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
AND
CITY OF ANDOVER
This agreement, entered into this /.k'f- day of < , 1990,
between Anoka County, a political subdivision of the State of Minne ta (hereinafter referred
to as the "County"), and the City of Andover, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.w., Andover, MN
55.304 (hereinafter referred to as the "Agency"):
RECITALS
A, The County is an urban county applicant for block grant funds under the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974 (the Act), Pub. L. 93-383 as amended, and will
receive block grant funds for the purpose of carrying out eligible community
development and housing activities under the Act and under regulations promulgated
by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) at 24 CFR p. 570;
B. An Urban County Consortium has been established by a Joint Cooperation Agreement
between the County and municipal corporations within the County, the terms of which
specify allocation of block grant funds to those participating jurisdictions for use in
accordance with the County Housing Assistance and Community Development Plans
accepted by participating jurisdictions and reviewed by HUD; ,
C, The County desires to have certain services performed by the Agency as described
within this agreement, and as authorized by Ano~a County resolutions for the purpose
of implementing eligible activities under the Act and HUD regulations;
D, It is appropriate and mutually desirable that the Agency be designated by the County
to undertake the aforementioned eligible activities, so long as the requirements of the
Act, HUD Regulations, state law and local law are adhered to, as provided for herein;
E, The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for cooperation between the County and
the Agency, as the parties in this agreement, in implementing such eligible activities in
the manner described above;
F, The parties are authorized and empowered to enter into this Agreement by the Laws of
the State of Minnesota.
G, The following attachments as listed below are hereby incorporated in this agreement
and made a part hereof:
, 1 -
~)
':_J
PART I. GENERAL CONDITIONS
PART II. FEDERAL AND LOCAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
PART III. EVALUATION AND RECORD KEEPING
Exhibit A ' Project Description Summary
Exhibit B - 1990 Program as approved by County 'Board
Exhibit C - County Board Resolution 85-42
Exhibit D - County Board Resolution 85-23
Exhibit E ' County Board Resolution 86-70
Exhibit F ' Certification
H,
In consideration of payments, covenants, and agreements hereinafter mentioned, to be
made and performed by the parties hereto, the parties mutually covenant and agree as
provided for in this agreement.
COUNTY
AGENCY
Tim Yantos
Deputy County Administrator
(Signature)
Date:
Name (Typed)
Approved as to form:
Title
Date:
Assistant Anoka County Attorney
- 2 -
~J
<J
PART I,
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1, SCOPE OF AGREEMENT
The Agreement between the parties shall consist of the signature page, the general
conditions; the federal, state and local program requirements; the evaluation and record
keeping requirements, each and every project exhibit incorporated into the Agreement;
all matters and laws incorporated by reference herein; and any written amendments
made according to the general conditions, This Agreement supersedes any and all
former agreements applicable to projects attached as exhibits to this Agreement.
2, SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Agency shall perform and carry out in a satisfactory and proper manner the
services set forth in the Project Request Form. This Agreement may be amended from
time to time, in accordance with the general conditions, for the purpose of adding new
projects, amending the scope of work, or for any other lawful purpose.
3, COMMENCEMENT AND TERMINATION OF PROJECTS
Upon release of project-related funds by HUD pursuant to federal regulations, the
County shall furnish the Agency with written notice to proceed. No work on the proiect
shall occur prior to the notice to proceed without written approval from the County.
Termination dates for individual projects shall be specified in the appropriate exhibits
and be in compliance with County Board Resolution #85-23, attached as Exhibit C.
Costs incurred after the termination date will not be reimbursed. The termination date
may be changed through amendment of this Agreement.
4, ADMINISTRATION
A. The Aqency shall appoint a liaison person who shall be responsible for overall
administration of block arant funded proiect(s) and coordination with the County
Housina and Community Development Proqram. The Aaency shall also
desianate one or more representatives who shall be authorized to sian the
monthly Voucher and Reportinq Form, The names of the liaison persons and
representatives shall be specified in the Exhibits,
5, COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT
A. The County shall reimburse the Agency for the services specified in the Exhibits
in an amount not to exceed the amount specified on Exhibit A. Reimbursement
shall be based on a Community Development Voucher and Reporting Form
submitted with supporting documents and signed by the Agency's authorized
representative,
- 3 -
(J
,~
B,
The Agency shall submit a properly executed Voucher and Reporting Form no
later than fifteen (15) working days after the close of each billing period. The
County will make payment to the Agency not more than
working days after said invoice is received and approved by Anoka County, The
County will issue a statement of correction voucher in the event that the voucher
request is erroneous, Payment does not constitute absolute approval.
6. OPERATING BUDGET
The Agency shall apply the funds received from the County under this Agreement in
accordance with the requirements of the Exhibit(s) attached hereto.
7, FUNDING ALTERNATIVES AND FUTURE SUPPORT
A, The Agency shall report all project income generated under this Agreement for
the purposes specified herein or generated through the project(s) funded under
this Agreement. All program income shall be forwarded to Anoka County
except as provided in Exhibit D, The County will maintain a record of program
income received by individual projects for future use by the subgrantee for
eligible CDBG activities.
B. The County makes no commitment to future support. and assumes no obligation
for future support of the activities contracted for herein, except as expressly set
forth in this Agreement.
C, Should anticipated sources of revenue not become available to the County for
use in the Community Development Block Program, the County shall immediately
notify the Agency in writing and the County will be released from all contracted
liability for that portion of the Agreement covered by funds not received by the
County.
8, AMENDMENTS
Either party may request modifications in the scope of services, terms, or conditions of
this Agreement. Proposed modifications which are mutually agreed upon shall be
incorporated by written amendment to this Agreement. A written amendment may affect
a project or projects authorized by this Agreement or may be of general application.
9, ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING
A, The Agency shall not assign any portion of this Agreement without the written
consent of the County, and it is further agreed that said consent must be sought
by the Agency not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the date of any proposed
assignment.
B. Any work or services assigned or subcontracted hereunder shall be subject to
each provision of this Agreement and proper bidding procedures contained
therein. The Agency agrees that it is as fully responsible to the County for the
- 4 -
:',)
10,
~~
acts and omissions of its subcontractors and of their employees and agents, as
it is for the acts and omissions of its own employees and agents.
HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION
A. The Agency further agrees that it is financially responsible (liable) for any audit
exception which occurs due to its negligence of failure to comply with the terms
of the Agreement.
B, The Agency agrees to protect and save the County, its elected and appointed
officials, agents, and employees while acting within the scope of their duties as
such, harmless from and against all claims, demands, and causes of action of
any kind or character, including the cost of defense thereof, arising in favor of
the Agency's employees or third parties on account of personal injuries, death
or damage to property arising out of services performed or omissions of services
or in any way resulting from the acts or omissions of the Agency and/or its
agents, employees, subcontractors or representatives under this Agreement.
11. INSURANCE
For all agencies which are not municipal corporations organized under the laws of the
State of Minnesota, the following insurance requirements shall apply:
A. Public Liability Insurance
The Agency shall obtain and maintain continuously public liability insurance
necessary to protect the public on the subject premises naming the County as
insured to the extent of Five Hundred Thousand and nO/100 ($500,000,00)
Dollars General Liability Insurance including bodily injury and property damage
with umbrella excess liability of Two Million and nO/100 ($2,000,000,00) Dollars
and provide proof of Worker's Compensation Insurance pursuant to the Statutes
of the State of Minnesota.
B, Buildinq Risk Insurance
The Agency shall cause to be maintained, during the period that contract work
is in progress, All Risk Builder's Insurance, (including fire, vandalism, malicious
mischief and extended coverages) in an amount not less than the value of
destructible contract work in place,
C, Proof of Insurance
The Agency shall provide certificates of insurance required under this section,
or, upon request of the County, duplicates of the policies as evidence of the
insurance protection afforded, Such insurance policies shall not be reduced or
cancelled without sixty (60) days prior written notice to the County.
- 5 .
~J
12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
A.
Interest of Officers. Emplovees, or Aqents - No employee, agent, consultant,
officer, or elected or appointed official of the Agency who exercises any
functions or responsibilities with respect to Block Grant Program activities
assisted under this Program or who are in a position to participate in a decision
making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may
obtain a personal or financial interest or benefit from the activity, or have an
interest in any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect thereto, or the
proceeds thereunder, either for themselves or those with whom they have family
or business ties, during their tenure or for one year thereafter.
B, Interest of Subcontractor and Their Emplovees . The Agency agrees that it will
incorporate into every subcontract required to be in writing and made pursuant
to this Agreement the following provisions:
The Contractor covenants that no person who presently exercises
any functions or responsibilities in connection with the Block Grant
Program, has any personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in
this Contract. The Contractor further covenants that he presently
has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or
indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the
performance of his services hereunder. The Contractor further
covenants that in the performance of this Contract no person
having any conflicting interest shall be employed. Any interest on
the part of the Contractor or his employees must be disclosed to
the Agency and the County,
13, DATA PRIVACY
All data collected, created, received, maintained, or disseminated, or used for any
purposes in the course of the Provider's performance of this Agreement is governed
by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes 1984, Section
13,01 et seq, or any other applicable State statutes and any State rules adopted to
implement the Act, as well as State statutes and Federal regulations on data privacy.
The Provider agrees to abide by these statutes, rules, and regulations and as they may
be amended.
14. TERMINATION
A, This Agreement is subject to termination upon thirty (30) days written notice by
the County should:
(1) The Agency mismanage or make improper or unlawful use of Agreement
funds; .
, '\
,
'-_/
- 6 -
,)
(2)
The Agency fail to comply with the terms and conditions expressed
herein or the applicable statutes, regulations and directives of the Federal
Government, State, or County;
(3) The Agency fail to provide work or services expressed by this Agreement;
or
(4) The Agency fail to submit reports or submit incomplete or inaccurate
reports in any material respect.
B. This Agreement may be terminated by the County immediately upon the receipt
by the County of notice of the loss of federal funding for the Community
Development Block Grant Program or any project of the Agency,
C. This Agreement is subject to termination upon thirty (30) days written notice by
the Agency should:
(1) The County fail in its commitment under this Agreement to provide
funding for services rendered, as herein provided; or
(2) Block Grant funds become no longer available from the Federal
Government or through the County.
D. Otherwise this Agreement shall terminate on the latest termination date specified
on the Project Request Form attached hereto and shall be subject to extension
only by mutual agreement and amendment in accordance with the General
Conditions of this Agreement except that the County may terminate the
agreement if funds are not expended as required by Exhibit C.
E. Upon termination of this Agreement any unexpended balance of Agreement
funds shall remain in the County Block Grant fund.
F. In the event that termination occurs under paragraph A(1} of this section, the
Agency shall return to the County all funds which were expended in violation of
the terms of this Agreement.
15, REVERSION OF ASSETS
Upon the expiration or termination of this agreement, the Agency shall transfer to the
County any CDBG funds on hand or in the accounts receivable attributable to the use
of CDBG funds, In addition, at the expiration or termination of this agreement, any real
property under the Agency's control that was acquired or improved in whole or in part
with CDBG funds in excess of $25,000,00 shall be disposed of in a manner which
results in the agency being reimbursed in the amount of the current fair market value
of the property less any portion thereof attributable to the expenditures of non-CDBG
funds for acquisition of, or improvement to, the real property. Such reimbursement
shall not be required if the conditions of 24 CFR ~ 570,503(b}(8}(i} are met and
satisfied.
'-)
- 7 .
(J
<_J
16,
DISPOSITION OF PROGRAM INCOME
Upon the expiration or termination of this agreement, program income shall be returned
by the Agency to the County,
- 8 -
~)
. \
',~
PART II,
FEDERAL AND LOCAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
1.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The Agency shall comply with the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974,
Public Law 93-383 as amended, and Implementing Regulations at 24 CFR p, 570.
2, PROCUREMENT STANDARDS
In awarding contracts pursuant to this Agreement, the Agency shall comply with all
applicable requirements of local and state law for awarding contracts, including but not
limited to procedures for competitive bidding, contractor's bonds, and retained
percentages. In addition, the Agency shall comply with the requirements of the U,S.
Office of Management and 24 CFR Part 85 or Budget Circular A.110 as appropriate,
relating to bonding, insurance and procurement standards; and with Executive Order
11246 regarding nondiscrimination bid conditions for projects over Ten Thousand and
no/100 ($10,000,00) Dollars, Where federal standards differ from local or state
standards, the stricter standards shall apply, The federal standard of Ten Thousand
and no/100 ($10,000,00) Dollars for competitive bidding shall apply only if the
applicable state or local standard for competitive bidding is less strict than Ten
Thousand and no/100 ($10,000,00) Dollars.
3. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A. National Environmental Policv Act . The County retains environmental review
responsibility for purposes of fulfilling requirements of the National Environmental
Policy Act as implemented by HUD Environmental Review Procedures (29 CFR
pt. 58), The County may require the Agency to furnish data, information and
assistance for the County's review and assessment in determining whether an
Environmental Impact Statement must be prepared.
B, State Environmental Policy Act. Agencies which are branches of government
under Minnesota Law retain responsibility for fulfilling the requirements of the
State Law regarding environmental policy and conservation, and regulations and
ordinances adopted thereunder, If the agency is not a branch of government
under Minnesota Law, the County may require the agency to furnish data,
information and assistance as necessary to enable the County to comply with
the State Environmental Policy Act.
C, Satisfaction of Environmental Requirements - Project execution under this
Agreement by either the County or the Agency shall not proceed until
satisfaction of all applicable requirements of the National and State
Environmental Policy Acts, A written notice to proceed will not be issued by the
County until all such requirements are complied with.
- 9 -
:)
....~
4, NONDISCRIMINATION
A,
General
The Agency shall comply with all federal, state and local laws prohibiting
discrimination on the basis of age, sex, marital status, race, creed,. color,
national origin or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap or
any other basis now or hereafter prohibited by Law. These requirements are
specified in Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of
1974; Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI; Civil Rights Act of 1968, Title VIII;
Executive Order 11063; Executive Order 11246; and Section 3 of the Housing
and Urban Development Act of 1968, Specifically, the Agency is prohibited from
taking any discriminatory actions defined in the HUD Regulations at 24 CFR
570,602(b) (1-3) and shall take such affirmative and corrective actions as are
required by the Regulations at CFR 570,602(b)(4). These requirements are
summarized in the following paragraphs:
B. Proqram Benefit
The Agency shall not discriminate against any resident of the project service
area by denying benefit from or participation in any block grant funded activity
on the basis of race, color, sex, or national origin. (Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title
VI; Civil Rights Act of 1968, Title VII; Section 109, Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974),
C, Fair Housinq
The Agency shall take necessary and appropriate actions to prevent
discrimination in federally assisted housing and lending practices related to
loans insured or guaranteed by the federal government. (Civil Rights Act of
1968, Title VII; Executive Order 11063)
D, Emplovment
1. In all solicitations under this Agreement, the Agency shall state that all
qualified applicants will be considered for employment. The words "equal
opportunity employer" in advertisements shall constitute compliance with
this section,
2. The Agency shall not discriminate against an employee or applicant for
employment in connection with this Agreement because of age, marital
status, race, creed, color, national origin, or the presence of any sensory,
mental or physical handicap, except when there is a bona fide
occupational limitation. Such action shall include, but not be limited to
the following: Employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment
or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of payor other
forms of compensation, and selection for training. (Executive Order
11246 as amended)
. 10 -
, "
,-j
3,
To the greatest extent feasible, the Agency shall provide training and
employment opportunities for lower income residents within the area
served by block grant assisted projects (Section 3, Housing and
Community Development Act of 1968, as amended).
E. Contractors and Suppliers
1. No contractor, subcontractor, union or vendor engaged in any activity
under this Agreement shall discriminate in the sale of materials,
equipment or labor on the basis of age, sex, marital status, race, creed,
color, national origin, or the presence of any sensory. mental, or physical
handicap, Such practices include upgrading, demotion, recruiting,
transfer, layoff, termination, pay rate, and advertisement for employment.
(Executive Order 11246 as amended)
2. All firms and organizations described above shall be required to submit
to the Agency certificates of compliance demonstrating that they have, in
fact, complied with the foregoing provisions; provided, that certificates of
compliance shall not be required from firms and organizations on
contracts and/or yearly sales of less than $10,000,
3, To the greatest extent feasible, the Agency shall purchase supplies and
services for activities under this agreement from vendors and contractors
whose businesses are located in the area served by block grant funded
activities or owned in substantial part by project area residents. (Section
3, Housing and Community. Development Act of 1968, as amended.)
F, Notice
1. The Aoencv shall include the provisions of the appropriate subsections
8.. B, C. D. and E of this section in everv contract or purchase order for
Qoods and services under this Aoreement and shall send to each labor
union or representative of workers with which it has a collective
bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding a notice
advising the said labor union or worker's representative of. the
commitments made in these subsections,
2. In advertising for employees, goods or services for activities under this
Agreement, the agency shall utilize minority publications in addition to
publications of general circulation,
5. LABOR STANDARDS
The Agency shall require that project construction contractors and subcontractors pay
their laborers and mechanics at wage rates in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act, as
amended (40 USC sections 327-333); provided that this section shall not apply to
,~)
- 11 -
,-"
'-J
rehabilitation of residential property designed for residential use by fewer than eight
families.
A copy of the current Davis-Bacon wage rate must be included in all construction bid
specs and contracts over Two Thousand and no/l00 ($2,000,00) Dollars.
6, PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
A, The Agency agrees that any nonexpendable personal property, purchased
wholly or in part with agreement funds at a cost of Three Hundred and no/l00
($300,00) Dollars or more per item, is upon its purchase or receipt the property
of the County and/or federal government. Final ownership and disposition of
such property shall be determined under the provisions of Appendix N to the
U,S. Office of Management and 24 CFR Part 85 or Budget Circular No. A.ll 0 as
appropriate.
B, The Agency shall be responsible for all such property, including its care and
maintenance.
C, The Agency shall admit the County's property management officer to the'
Agency's prel'Dises for the purpose of marking such property, as appropriate,
with county property tags.
D. The Agency shall meet the following procedural requirements for all such
property:
1, Property records shall be maintained accurately and provide for: a
description of the property; manufacturer's serial number or other
identification number; acquisition date and cost; source of the property;
percentage of block grant funds used in the purchase of property; and
location, use, and condition of the property.
2. A physical inventory of property shall be taken and the results reconciled
with the property records at least once every two (2) years to verify the
existence, current utilization, and continued need for the property.
3. A control system shall be in effect to insure adequate safeguards to
prevent loss, damage, or theft to the property. Any loss, damage, or
theft of the property shall be investigated and fully documented,
4. Adequate maintenance procedures shall be implemented to keep the
property in good condition.
7, ACQUISITION AND RELOCATION
A.
Any acquisition of real property for any activity assisted under this Agreement
which occurs on or after the date of the County's submission of its Block Grant
application to HUD shall comply with Title III of the Federal Uniform Relocation
<)
- 12 -
()
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as amended by
the Uniform Relocation Act Amendments of 1987 Title IV of the Surface
Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987 (Pub, L 100-17,
101 Stat. 246-256) (hereinafter referred to as the Uniform Act) (40 USC section
4601) and the Regulations at 49 CFR pt. 24, '
B,
Any displacement of persons, business, nonprofit organizations or farms
occurring on or after the date of the County's submission of its Block Grant
application as the result of acquisition of real property assisted under this
Agreement shall comply with Title II of the Uniform Act as amended by the
Uniform Relocation Act Amendments of 1987 Title IV of the Surface
Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987 (Pub. L 100-17,
101 Stat. 246-256) and the Regulations at 49 CFR pt. 24. The Agency shall
comply with the Regulations pertaining to costs of relocation and written policies,
as specified by 24 CFR section 570,606 (a) & (b),
8. HISTORIC PRESERVATION
The Agency shall meet the historic preservation requirements of Public Law 89-665 and
the Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (Pub, L. 93-291) and Executive
.
Order 11593, including the procedures prescribed by the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation in the Regulations at 36 CFR pt. 800, Activities affecting property listed in
or found to be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places will be
subject to requirements set forth in HUD Environmental Review Procedures at 24 CFR
pt. 58,
9. ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS
Any facility constructed pursuant to this Agreement shall comply with design
requirements of the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 (42 USC section 4151).
10. NONPARTICIPATION IN POLITICAL ACTIVITIES
The Agency shall comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act (5 USC Chapter 15),
11. NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE
The Agency may not receive Community Development Block Grant funding for
acquisition or construction for use in any area that has been identified as having
special flood hazards and is not participating in the National Flood Insurance Program,
as provided by Section 3{a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (Pub, L. 93-
234) and the Regulations thereunder (24 CFR Ch. X, subchap. B), The Agency shall
comply with the Regulations at 24 CFR section 570,605.
.:)
- 13 -
~)
13,
'-J
12,
AIR AND WATER POLLUTION
The Agency shall comply with the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42
USC section 1857 gg ~ and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended
(33 USC sections 1251 et ~ and the regulations issued thereunder (40 CFR pt. 15).
LEAD-BASED PAINT POISONING
The Agency shall comply with the HUD Lead-Based Paint Regulations (24 CFR pt. 35)
issued pursuant to the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 USC sections
4831 et ~ requiring prohibition of the use of lead-based paint (whenever funds
under this Agreement are used directly or indirectly for construction, rehabilitation, or
modernization of residential structures); elimination of immediate lead-based paint
hazards in residential structures; and notification of the hazards of lead-based paint
poisoning to purchasers and tenants of residential structures constructed prior to 1950,
14, NONSUBSTITUTION FOR LOCAL FUNDING
The Block Grant Funding made available under this Agreement shall not be utilized by
the Agency to reduce substantially the amount of local financial support for community
development activities below the level of such support prior to the availability of funds
under this Agreement. .
15, PUBLIC OWNERSHIP
For Agencies which are not municipal corporations organized under the laws of the
State of Minnesota, it may become necessary to grant the County a property interest
where the subject project calls for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction,
rehabilitation, or installation of publicly-owned facilities and improvements. The Agency
shall comply with current County policy regarding transfer of a property interest
sufficient to meet the public ownership requirement.
16, PUBLIC INFORMATION
A, In all news releases and other public notices related to projects funded under
this Agreement, the Agency shall include information identifying the source of
funds as the Anoka County Community Development Block Grant Program,
B. For all construction projects the Agency shall erect a sign to County
specifications at the construction site, identifying the source of funds, except
that this requirement may be waived for construction projects of Ten Thousand
and nO/100 ($10,000,00) Dollars or less.
17. APPLICABLE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. An Agency which is the governmental entity (including public agencies) shall
comply with the requirements and standards of OMB Circul~r No. A-8?,
"Principles for Determining Costs Applicable to Grants and Contracts with State,
- 14 -
~)
Local and Federally recognized Indian Tribal Governments", OMS Circular A-128,
"Audits of State and local Governments" (implemented at 24 CFR Part 44) and
with the following sections of 24 CFR Part 85 "Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local
Governments":
(1) Section 85,3, "Definitions";
. (2) Section 85,6, "Exceptions";
(3) Section 85.12, "Special grant or subgrant conditions for 'high-risk'
grantees";
(4) Section 85,20, "Standards for financial management systems," except
paragraph (a);
(5) Section 85,21, "Payment," except as modified by ~ 570,513;
(6) Section 85,22, ':Allowable costs";
(7) Section 85,26, "Non-federal audits";
(8) Section 85,32, "Equipment," except in all cases in which the equipment
is sold, the proceeds shall be program income;
(9) Section 85,33, "Supplies";
(10) Section 85,34, "Copyrights";
(11) Section 85,35, "Subawards to debarred and suspended parties";
(12) Section 85.36, "Procurement," except paragraph (a);
(13) Section 85.37, "Subgrants";
(14) Section 85.40, "Monitoring and reporting program performance," except
paragraphs (b) through (d) and paragraph (f);
(15) Section 85.41, "Financial reporting," except paragraphs (a), (b), and (e);
(16) Section 85.42, "Retention and access requirements for records";
(17) Section 85.43, "Enforcement";
(18) Section 85.44, "Termination for convenience";
(19) Section 85.51, "Later disallowances and adjustments" and
(20) Section 85,52, "Collection of amounts due."
B, An Agency if it is not a governmental entity, shall comply with the requirements
and standards of OMB Circular No, A-122, "Cost Principles for Non Profit
Organizations" or OMB Circular No. A-21 , "Cost Principles for Educational
Institutions," as applicable, and with the following Attachments to OMB Circular
No. A-110;
(1) Attachment A, "Cash Depositories", except for paragraph 4 concerning
deposit insurance;
(2) Attachment B, "Bonding and Insurance";
(3) Attachment C, "Retention and Custodial Requirements for REcords",
except that in lieu of the provisions in paragraph 4, the retention period
for records pertaining to individual CDSG activities starts from the date
of submission of the annual performance and evaluation report, as
prescribed in ~ 570,507, in which the specific activity is reported on for
the final time;
(4) Attachment F, "Standards for Financial Management Systems";
. _J
- 15 -
:)
(5)
(6)
,J
(7)
Attachment H, "Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance",
Paragraph 2;
Attachment N, "Property Management Standards", except for paragraph
3 concerning the standards for real property, and except that paragraphs
6 and 7 are modified so that -
(i) In all cases in which personal property is sold, the proceeds shall
be program income, and
(ii) Personal property not needed by the sub recipient for CDBG
activities shall be transferred to the recipient for the CDBG
program or shall be retained after compensating the recipient; and
Attachment 0, "Procurement Standards,"
- 16 -
PART III. EVALUATION AND RECORD KEEPING
,- )
,~
1,
EVALUATION
The Agency agrees to participate with the County in any evaluation project or
performance report, as designed by the County or the appropriate Federal agency,
and to make available all information required by any such evaluation process,
2, AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS
The Agency shall obtain an independent audit on an annual basis if the budget is at
least $25,000,00. Such audit shall be made by qualified individuals who are sufficiently
independent of those who authorize the expenditure of Federal funds. The audit report
shall state that the audit was performed in accordance with the generally accepted
governmental audit standards for financial and compliance audits of the U, S. General
Accounting Office Standards for Audit of Governmental Orqanizations. Proqrams,
Activities. and Functions, and the provisions of OMB A-11 0,
The records and documents with respect to all matters covered by this contract shall
be subject at all times to inspection, review or audit by the County, County, Federal or
State officials so authorized by law during the performance of this contract and during.
the period of retention specified in this Part III.
3. RECORDS
As required by HUD Regulations, 24 CFR pt. 570, the Agency shall compile and
maintain the following records:
A, Financial Management - Such records shall identify adequately the source and
application of funds for activities within this Agreement, in accordance with the
provisions of Appendix G to the U,S, Office of Management and 24 CFR Part 85
or Budget Circular A-110 as appropriate, These records shall contain
information pertaining to grant awards and authorizations, obligations,
unobligated balances, assets, liabilities, outlays, and income.
B, Citizen Participation -Narrative and other documentation describing the process
used to inform citizens concerning the amount of funds available, the ranges of
project activities undertaken, and opportunities to participate in funded block
grant projects,
C. Relocation - Indication of the overall status of the relocation workload and a
separate relocation record for each person, business, organization, and farm
operation displaced or in the relocation workload.
D. Property Acquisition - Agency files must contain (a) invitation to owner to
accompany appraiser during inspection, (b) at least one property appraisal, (c)
statement of basis for determination of just compensation, (d) written offer of just
"-
'-~
- 17 -
/ ')
'-~
compensation; (e) all documents involving conveyance, (D settlement cost
reporting statement, and (g) notice to surrender possession of premises.
E.
Equal Opportunity - The Agency shall maintain racial, ethnic, and gender data
showing the extent to which these categories of persons have participated in,
or benefitted from, the activities carried out under this Agreement. The Agency
shall also maintain data which records its affirmative action in equal opportunity
employment, and its good-faith efforts to identify, train, and/or hire lower- income
residents of the project area and to utilize business concerns which are located
in or owned in substantial part by persons residing in the area of the project.
F.
Labor Standards - Records shall be maintained regarding compliance of all
contractors performing construction work under this Agreement with the labor
standards made applicable by 24 CFR 570,603.
G.
Determinations of Condition of Slum and Bliqht
The agency will submit:
1, an attorney's opinion that an area designated as slum or blighted for
the purpose of qualifying a CDBG activity meets the State or local
definition of same;
2. the boundary of the area so designated;
3, a list of the conditions the CDBG-funded activity is intended to address,
In the event that a single property is designated as blighted, the
community must submit a certified building inspector's report on the
conditions leading to that determination~
H, Economic Development
The agency will maintain copies of financial statements that indicate the
historical and projected income of a company approved for CDBG assistance,
Those records will include three years of profit and loss statements, balance
statements and projected income statements, The agency will also keep records
indicating the amount and terms of assistance provided together with an
explanation of how the assistance provided meets the "necessary and
appropriate" requirements communicated in the June 2, 1987 Stokvis
memorandum,
I. Such other records as may be required by the County and/or HUD,
4. RETENTION OF RECORDS
Required records shall be retained for a period of three (3) years after termination of
this Agreement, except as follows: (1) Records that are the subject of audit findings
shall be retained for three (3) years after such findings have been resolved. (2) Records
')
~-- /"
- 18 -
':)
.~-)
for nonexpendable property shall be retained for three (3) years after its final
disposition. Nonexpendable property is defined in Appendix N to U.S, Office of
Management and 24 CFR Part 85 or Budget Circular A-11 0 as appropriate.
5,
REPORTS
The Agency shall submit such reports as required by the County on a monthly.
quarterly or annual basis and also prior to project execution, Those reports will include
but not be limited to client information, revolving fund accounting, inventory
management, general accounting, property acquisition/disposition,
displacement/relocation, and low-income housing replacement.
- 19 -
~J
--)
Exhibit B
FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
FOR
1990 ANOKA COUNTY
CD8G PROGRAM
The following objectives have been established for assisting communities and citizen groups
in the formulation of specific program activities. The objectives listed below are in brief form,
A more complete development of program policy and rationale may be found by contacting the
above mentioned source.
1. Support decent, safe housing for residents in Anoka County through: (1) rehabilitation
of existing structures; (2) eligible assistance for construction of new lower income
housing; (3) acquisition of housing suitable to meet lower income needs.
2. Assist program efforts to redevelop blighted areas through: acquisition and clearance,
upgrading public facilities and utilities, encouraging new development, seeking local
financial commitment to the effort.
3. Develop and upgrade public facilities and utilities which serve primarily lower income
persons or which are an integral part of redevelopment efforts in blighted areas.
4. Support economic development in Anoka County to provide new jobs, primarily for lower
income persons.
5. Promote the removal of architectural barriers,
6. Provide funding for public service activities which serve primarily lower income persons.
7. Planning and administration to support the above.
The above objectives were developed in cooperation with the communities in Anoka County
and are based on need as illustrated by statistics drawn from the 1980 census data and
comments from community residents, Overall, they are a continuation of the 1981-1989 CDBG
programs, with many communitIes sustaining efforts begun in those years.
:,-J
"The.. budget totale reflect total available to the City, not the total of the city proJecw In thle column .Ince tome of the city doll.no are
placed In Alexandra Hou... RISE and/or ARC on lut page. _"
Page 3.
~ ') Columbus Townshlg ,
'-
032 Senior Coordinator $12,000 VI For Township Senior Center, 16319
Kettle River Boulevard.
059 Contingency for '91 $5.118
,
i Total Columbus Township $17,118
Coon Rapids
033 Economic Development $87,423 IV Loans to business.
046 Public Services Pool $8,900 VI N.W. Kinship, Senior Companion,
Metro Center for Independent Uving,
all providing services in the City of
Coon Rapids.
.
Contingency $7.910
Total Coon Rapids *$122,733
East Bethel
036 Coon Lake and Central Ave. $34,472 , II Acquisition, clearance and
other
Redevelopment eligible activities to improve these
blighted areas in the neighborhood
at the southeast corner of Coon
Lake and along Central Avenue
between 205th and 221 st Avenues.
Fridley
038 Riverview Heights $70,000 II Acquisition of property in Mississippi
River flood plain and necessary
relocation. Project area is north of
Rice Creek and south of 79th.
039 Human Services $33,291 VI Funded agencies to be determined
by commission and council.
Contingency 155
$103,446
Total Fridley
,.) oTh_ budget totale reft..:t total available to the City, net the total 01 the city proj..:w I~. thle column einee tome 01 the city dolla" ara
placed In Alexandra Hou.., FUSE and/or ARC on lut page.
"-)
OThe.. budgft totale rellee! total waJlabIe to the City, not 1M total of the city proJecta In th'- column elnce eome of the city dollars are
placed In Alexandra Hou... RISE MdI<< ARC on lut page. -
Page 5.
.~ J Multl-Cltv Prolecta
-J
048 Alexandra House
050 RISE Sheltered Workshop
049 ARC
$24,500 VI
$40,100 VI
$9,200 VI
General operations and intervention
project for battered women's shelter
serving all of Anoka County.
Expansion of RISE Sheltered
Workshop on Sunset Boulevard in
Spring Lake Park. Serves training
and employment needs of disabled
and handicapped adults.
Toy lending library and teen/adult
drop-in center at 1100 90th Avenue
in Blaine serves mentally
handicapped population.
THESE MULTI-CITY BUDGETS MAY BE INCREASED BY LATER CITY ADDmONS,
County
051 Administration
052 Economic Development
053 Housing Rehabilitation
060 Uncommitted Contingency
Economic Development
Activities to be funded by
estimated Program Income
Additional housing
rehabilitation activities
to be funded by est/mated
Program Income
Total Estimated Budget
$99,000 VII
$58,900 IV
$170,000
$81,096
$110,000 IV
$35,000
$1,340,000
Planning/administration for County-
wide economic deveiopment.
. Single family owner occupied
housing rehab activities, County-
wide.
Activities to promote economic
development including but not
limited to loans to private
businesses,
See Project #053,
Exhibit C
BOARD ')F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Anoka County, Mlnne.ota
DATE
April 2J. 1985
RESOLUTION NO.
A5-42
~)
OFFERED BY COMMISSIONER Langfeld
Ccx.NTY BOARD POLICY -
COMMU'lITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM INCOME
AMEN)ING RESOLUTIONS 81-107 AN) 82-53
WHEREAS, Title I of the Housing and Comm...,ity Development Act of 1974 as
amended provides far a program of Comm...,ity Development Block Grants; and,
WHEREAS, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners has been desiglaled as an
"Urban County" by the Federal Housing and Urban Development Depar Imenl and
consequently is eligible to perticipate in the National Community Development Block
Grant Program; and,
WHEREAS, Ihe Anoka County Boerd of Commissioners has direcled Ihe
preparation of a plan under Ihe Community Development Block Granl Program in
coreert with the municipolilies of Anoka County; and,
WHEREAS, as a partion of said plan, municipalities as Ihe sub-gronlee of
Community Development Block Grant funds may ulilize said funds in various program
forms to. benefit low and moderate income persons, to aid in the pre....nlion or
elimination of slums or blight or to meet other community development needs having a
particular urgency because of threat to health and safety; and,
WHEREAS, "program income" means grass income eerned by the sub-granle..
from the grant suppart..d activity such as: proc....ds from the sale of real or personol
property, int..r..st ..arned an ..scrow accounts, revolving r..habilitation accounts or
lump sum r....abilitation occounts, income from servic.. f..es, sole of commoditi..s,
usoge or r..ntol f..es, loan proceeds from rl!hobilltation or l!Conomic dev..lopm..nt loans,
and interest earned on T..volvin'g loans aid proc....ds from special assessm..nts I..vied 10
r..cover the cost of constructing a public works or facility to th.. ..xt..nt that such cost
was initially paid with th.. Comm...,ity D..v..lopment Block Grant f...,ds; and,
WHEREAS, in accordare.. with F ..deral r..gulations, Anoka County as Ihe
Community D..v..lopment Block Grant rl!Cipi..nt must r..ceive all program income. Th..
County then may us.. said funds for any eligible Community D..v..lopment Block Grant
activity and th.. County must ..xpend revenUl!S generat..d by program income befor..
furthl!!' drawdown reqUl!sts will be authoriz..d; and,
WHEREAS, payments of inll!!'est aid principal due on l!CO/1omic dev..lopm..nl
loans to privat.. industry, which or.. made 10 a revolving loan account which was
approv..d as a C.D.G.B, grant to a Statl!-C..rtifi..d local development corporalion or..
not considered by HUD to b.. "program income":
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that th.. Anoka County Board of
Commissioners does h..reby establish as a matter of palicy that:
I) All incom.. from CDBG-furided activities which m..ets th.. abev.. definition of
program incom.., shall be promptly forwarded to Anoka County.
2) Each LDC which has a CDBG r..volving loan account for l!Conomic development
will retain loan repaym..nts within the account for continUl!d us.. for l!Conomic
dev..lopm..nt and that th.. County or the city will"xl!Cut.. an agr....ment with th..
LDC which will includ..:
0)
Prohibition of conflict of interest as provided in HUD Regulation 24CFR
Part 570,611,
b)
Compliare.. with Till.. VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
c)
R..quirem..nt for th.. LDC to submit qvorterly reports 10 th.. Anoka Counly
Community D..velopment Dirl!Ctor regarding th.. us.. and results of
..xpenditure of funds from Ihe revolving loon account for so long os Anoka
Counly r..moins on ..ntitl..m..nt county.
Any olh..r provisions rl!QUir..d by S.lat.. or F..d..rallaw or regulalion.
'-)
d)
RESOLUTION 185-42 (Contin""d)
Poge 2
:)
J)
Anoko Covnty will establish as of May I, 1985, a revalvinq loan account for
deposit of all economic development loan poyments received by Anoka County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, all program income received by Anoka County
from activities f......ded in total or pat from 0 municipolity's CDBG project will
increase that community's budo;et for eligible CDBG activities and shall therefore be
avoilable to the community far future expenditure pursuant to the Joint Cooperation
Agreement in effect at the time of expenditure.
YES NO
Dis trict /II - Haas X Haas
District 1/2 - Burman X Burman
District IIJ - Longfeld X Lanqfeld
District 114 - Kordiak X Kardiok
District liS - Cenaiko X Cenaiko
District 116 - McCarron X McCarron
District 117 - Erhart X Erhcrt
State of Minnesota ) SS
County of Anoka )
I, JoI1n "Jay" Mclinden, County Administrator, Anoko County, Minnesota, hereby
certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of the resolution of the County Board
of said County with the original record thereof an file in the Administration Office,
Anaka County, Minnesota, as stated in the minutes of the proceedings of said Board at
a meeting duly held an April 2J, 1985, and that the same is 0 true and correct copy of
said original record and of the whole thereof, and that said resolution was duly passed
by said Board at said meeting.
Witness my hand and seal this 2Jrd day of April, 1985.
\
<~
~12. )H~~
HN ~ Y"AcLlN
COUN ADMINISTRA TOR
~xnlOl t U
BOARt. J' COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Anoka County, Mlnn..ota
February 21. 1995 RESOLUTION NO. 85-23
DATE
~,)
OFFERED BY COMMISSIONER Langfeld
T1toEL Y EXJ'9.I>ITI.R; OF C.O.B.G. FLN:>S
Wt-EREAS, Anoka County is on Entitlement County and therefore reeeives
ann.JCl1 Community Development Block Grant IC08G) allocations from the U.S.
Deportment of Housing and Urban Development; and,
Wt-EREAS, the Anaka County Boord of Commissioners makes these C08G funds
ovoiloble to municipalities in Anoka County for eligible projects; and,
Wt-EREAS, Anoka County, os the grantee, is responsible for the timely
expenditure of C08G fundS; and,
Wt-EREAS, Anaka County's performance is measured in part by such timely
performance; and,
Wt-EREAS, Anaka County may be subjeet to HUO fiscal sanctions for failure to
expend C08G funds within 0 reasonable period of timel
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaka County Boord of
Commissioners adopts the following Policy Regarding Schedule for Expenditure of
Community Development Block Grant Funds by Anaka County Sub grantees:
POLICY REGARDING SCt-EDULE FOR EXPENDITURE OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
BY ANOKA COUNTY Sl.eGRANTEES
Community Development Block Grant F\KIds will be reserved for eligible budgeted
subgrantee activities for up to 18 manths after notice of availability of such funds for
expenditure. If 0 community' foils to expend C08G project f\KIds within that time
limit, the Anaka County Boord of Commissioners will wilhaaw the allocation for that
projeet.
In order that communities may hove adequate notice of the impending withdrawal,
County C08G stoff will notify those communities which have not committed CD8G
project funds within 12 months after the start of the opplicoble C08G program year of
that condition. Such notice will enable those communities to re-evaluate projeets and
to program the funds if neeessory.
Those communities whiCh ore in violation of the 18 month rule at. the time of adoption
of this policy will be given six months from the dote of the County Boord Resolution
referencing this policy, to expend their CDBG project funds. At the end of the six
month period, the funds will be subjeet to withdrawal.
The Anaka County Board may on on individual cose basis, eleet to waive the 18 month
rule if the Boord should determine that the project delay is caused by forces outside
the control of the community and that project completion is feasible within 0
reasonable amount of time.
Funds which revert to Anaka County sholl be reallocated at the discretion of the
County Boord to either other projects submilled by communities or to County-wide
activities.
Any community based groups or other subgrantees of communities must be notified of
this policy when they ore considered for CDBG funding.
,.,J
RESOLUTION 185-23 IConti~d)
YES
NO
.~J
District" - Haas
Dis trict 12 - Burman
District 13 -langfeld
Dis trict 14 - Kordiok
District IS - Cenoiko
District 1(, - McCarron
District '7 - Erhort
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
Haas
Burman
Langfeld
Kordiok
Cenoika
McCorron
Erhort
5 tote of Minnesota ) 55
County of Anoka )
I, John "Jay" McLinden, County Administrator, Anoka County, Minnesota, hereby
certi fy that I have compored the foregoing copy of the resolution of the County Boord
of said County with the original record thereof on file in the Administration Office,
Anoka County, Minnesota, os stated in the minutes of the proceedings of said Boord at
o meeting duly held on Februory 21, 1985, and that the some is 0 true and correct copy
of said original record and of the whole thereof, and that said resolution was duly
passed by said Boord at said meeting. . .
Wi tness my hand and seal this 21 st day of F ebruory, 1985.
~~~
"J "1c N
OUNT ADMINISTRATOR
I
<J
Exhi bit E
~)
OFFERED BY COMMISSIONER
BOARD IF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Anoka County, Minnesota
August 12, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 86-70
Haas 5 teffen
DATE
COUNTY BOARD POliCY _
COMMUNITY DEVELOPIo'ENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM INCOIo'E
AIo'EI'VING RESOLUTION 85-42
WHEREAS, Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 os
amended provides for 0 program of Community Development Block Gronts; ond,
WHEREAS, the Anoka County Boord of Commissioners has been designoted os on
"Urban County" by the Federal Housing and Urban Development Depar tment and
consequently is eligible to participote in the Notional Community Development Block
Grant Program; ond,
WHEREAS, the Anoka County Boord of Commissioners has directed the
preparation of a pion under the Community Development Block Grant Program in
concert with the municipalities of Anoko County; and,
WHEREAS, os 0 portion of said plan, municipalities os the sub-grontee of
Community Development Block Grant funds may utilize said funds in vorious progrom
forms to benefit low and moderate income persons, to aid in the prevention or
elimination of slums or blight or to meet other community development needs having 0
particular urgency because of threat to health and safety; and,
WHEREAS, "program income" means income earned by the sub-grantee from the
grant supported ac.tivity such os: proceeds from the sole of real or personal property,
interest earned on escrow accounts, revolving rehabilitation accounts or lump sum
rehabilitation accounts, income from service fees, sole of commodities, usoge or
rental Fees, loon proceeds from rehabilitation or economic development loons, and
interest earned on revolving loons and proceeds from special assessments levied to
recover the cost of construct.ing 0 public works or facility to the extent that such cost
was initially paid with the Community Development Block Grant funds; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with Federal regulations, Anoka County os the
Community Development Block Grant recipient must receive 011 program income, to
be used For any eligible Community Development Block Grant activity and the County
must expend revenues generated by program income before further drawdown requests
will be authorized:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anoka County Boord of
Commissioners does hereby estoblish os 0 mailer of policy that:
I) All CDBG program income meeting the above definition, except payments t~ "
County-approved LDC revolving loon account, sholl be promptly forwarded to
Anoka County.
2) Each LDC which has 0 CDBG revolving loon account for economic development
will retain loan repayments within the account for continued use for economic
development subject to 011 CDBG r~gulations, and that the County or the ci ty
will exeeute on agreement with the LDC which will include:
0) Prohibition of conflict of interest os provided in HUD Regulation 24CFR
Port S70.611.
b) Compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
c) Requirement for the LDC to submit quarterly reports to the Anoka County
Community Development Director regarding the use and results of
expenditure of funds from the revolving loon account for so long os Anoka
County remains on entitlement county.
d) Any other provisions required by State or Federal low or regulotion.
3) Anoka County has established os of May 1, 1985, 0 revolving loon account for
deposit of 011 economic development loon payments received by Anoka County.
I
\,
i
I
I
I
I
I
,
,j
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, 011 program income received by Anoka County
from activities funded in total or port from 0 municipality's CDBG project will
increose that community's budget for eligible CDBG activities ond sholl therefore be
available to the community for future expenditure pursuant to the Joint Cooperation
Agreement in effect at the time of expendjture.
RESOLUTION 18&-70
Page 2
,] YES NO
District II - Haas 5 teffen X Haas 5 teffen
District 02 - Burman X Burman
District IIJ - Langfeld Absent Langfeld
District 114 - Kordiak X Kordiok
District 115 - Cenaika X Cenaiko
District 116 - McCorron X McCarron
District 07 - Erhart X Erhart
5 tote of Minnesota )SS
County of Anoka )
I, John "Joy" McLinden, County Administrotor, Anoka County, Minnesoto, hereby
certify that I hove compored the foregoing copy of the resolution of the County Board
of soid County with the originol record thereof on file in the Administration Office,
Anoko County, Minnesota, os stoted in the minutes of the proceedings of said Board ot
o meeting duly held on August 12, 1986, and thot the some is 0 true ond correct copy
of said originol record and of the whole thereof, and that soid resolution wos duly
passed by said Board at said meeting.
Witness my hand and seal this 12th day of August, 1986.
~hlt~~/ ~
OUNTY ADMINIS TRA TOR
<J
.
~-)
,j
EXHIBIT F
CERTIFICATION
The Undersigned, on behalf of the Agency, certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and
belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the
undersigned, to any person for influencing or at1empting to influence an officer or employee
of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee
of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making
of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative
agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any
Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any
person for influencing or at1empting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a
Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of
Congress. in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the
undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report
Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the
award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts
under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and
disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this
transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for
making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1332, title 31, U.S. Code. Any
person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less
than 510,000 and not more than 5100,000 for each such failure.
AGENCY
By:
By:
Its:
Its:
Date:
Date: .
PRELIMINARY PROJECT REQUEST FORM
)
I. PROJECT NAME: ANDOVER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING
1990 Project ill
II. PROJECT ACTIVITY
A. Briefly describe the project
1. Project location (attach a map)
2. Project activities (acquisition, relocation, construction, demolition,
rehabilitation, administration, etc.)
3. Detail the number of persons benefitting.
4. How are they benefitting?
5. How many persons are low income?
III. PROJECT DURATION:
A. Is this a one, two or three year project?
B. .Give Project termination date.
IV. If the Project is more than one year, detail the project activities by year.
V. Briefly describe the Community problems that the activities address.
(For example, neighborhood blight, lack of low income jobs, substandard housing.)
VI. Summarize the funding.
A. Total revenue needed.
B. Total C.D.B.G. revenue needed.
C. Source and amount of other revenue.
VII. Detail the cost of each activity (demonstrate how each cost was arrived at).
VIII. Briefly describe the project area.
A. Its geographical size.
B. Number of households, or businesses.
C. Adequacy of the public facilities (sewers, water, streets, etc.).
D. Age of the neighborhood, of the homes or businesses.
IX. Is this project part of a larger effort? If yes, explain!
X. Project contact person:
XI. RESOLUTION OF LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT: ATIACH TO FORM
XII. Individual authorized to request reimbursements for project expenses from Anoka
County.
XIII. ATIACH A PROJECT SCHEDULE.
'. )
XIV. Detail any demolition of housing suitable for lower income households. New
requirements call for one-for-one replacement.
'/~"~:'''''.":.';''.,.,.
~'"
F <._'.
, ~/ \;l.
H ~:l
,J l:',k
,," ~"
'.", .&. ','
'/" ~
t,~ l
CITY of ANDOVER
PROJECT 111
......~:~;
PRELIMINARY PROJECT REQUEST
Anoka County Community Development Block Grant - 1990
I. PROJECT NAME
Andover Comprehensive Planning
II. PROJECT ACTIVITY
The proposed project is the continuation of the 1989
CDBG Program and will update and improve long range
planning efforts within the City. The current Andover
Comprehensive Plan was completed in 1980 and approved
in 1982. It addresses few if any housing, (low and
moderate income) issues. Because of the rapid growth
experienced by Andover, the Comprehensive Plan should
address public services and facilities. Administrative
costs will be included in this project.
All residents of the City of Andover will benefit from
the update and improvement of the City's Comprehensive
Plan. As the City continues to grow, residents will be
better served if the City has long range goals and
plans with which to guide development.
III. &
IV. PROJECT DURATION
The Comprehensive Plan is projected to take two years
to update, including plan preparation, public input,
City approval and Metropolitan Council approval. The
City Comprehensive plan will guide development and City
improvement for the next five years and if implemented
properly, into the next century.
V. This project would address the problems of housing,
sewer and water capacity planning, parks and
recreation, public facility development, commercial
development and other development and growth issues.
VI. The Andover City Council proposes to use $20,000 in
1989 and $21,500 in 1990 for updating the Comprehensive
Plan. Total dollars spent will depend upon how many
major community issues and solutions and discussed by
the Andover Comprehensive plan Task Force.
:J
(-~
~
Page 2
Andover CDBG Proposal
February 22, 1990
VII. 1990 Planning Costs
Recording Secretary
Miscellaneous Supplies
Total
$20,000
$ 1,200
$ 300
$21,500
VIII. Because this project will be a City-wide effort, it is
impossible to determine at this time, the number of
households that will be served by this project.
IX. Andover believes that planning long range growth is
vital to the proper use of resources within the city,
including finances and land. As the City continues to
improve long range planning efforts within the City,
all residents will benefit from a better living
environment.
Andover
X. ~~ City planner is the project contact person.
Andover
XII. ~~ City planner and William G. Hawkins, City
Attorney are the individuals authorized to request
reimbursements for project expenses.
XIII. PROJECT SCHEDULE
July 1, 1990 - March 1991
March 1991 - June 1991
Planning Process
Metropolitan Council
Review and Approval
PRELIMINARY PROJECT REQUEST FORM
:J
,
I. PROJECT NAME: PUBLIC SERVICE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
1990 Project 112
II. PROJECT ACTIVITY
A. Briefly describe the project
1. Project location (attach a map)
2. Project activities (acquisition, relocation, construction, demolition,
rehabilitation, administration, etc.)
3. Detail the number of persons benefitting.
4. How are they benefitting?
5. How many persons are low income?
III. PROJECT DURATION:
A. Is this a one, two or three year project?
B. Give Project termination date.
IV. If the Project is more than one year, detail the project activities by year.
V. Briefly describe the Community problems that the activities address.
(For example, neighborhood blight, lack of low income jobs, substandard housing.)
VI. Summarize the funding.
A. Total revenue needed.
B. Total C.D.B.G. revenue needed.
C. Source and amount of other revenue.
VII. Detail the cost of each activity (demonstrate how each cost was arrived at).
VIII. Briefly describe the project area.
A. Its geographical size.
B. Number of households, or businesses.
C. Adequacy of the public facilities (sewers, water, streets, etc.).
D. Age of the neighborhood, of the homes or businesses.
IX. Is this project part of a larger effort? If yes, explain!
X. Project contact person:
XI. RESOLUTION OF LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT: ATTACH TO FORM
XII. Individual authorized to request reimbursements for project expenses from Anoka
County.
XIII. ATTACH A PROJECT SCHEDULE.
~)
XIV. Detail any demolition of housing suitable for lower income households. New
requirements call for one-for-one replacement.
/ '"\
'-~
. ,.~./~'".'".,.,...;;'
.: \,
" \\
6 'f
...... ~ -!
. ~;.. .
. . '. ~ 7.'.
J,,:f~,i;
<J
CITY of ANDOVER
PROJECT #2
....
PRELIMINARY PROJECT REQUEST
Anoka County Community Oevelopment Block Grant - 1990
I. PROJECT NAME
Andover Public Service Assistance Program
II. PROJECT ACTIVITY
The proposed project will assist several local public
service programs that serve low and moderate income
families or individuals. The City will designate a
portion of the COBG funds for programs that meet COBG
criteria. An application procedure, approved by Anoka
County, will be used to determine which programs
receive funding. All public service programs must
serve low and moderate income individuals.
Administrative costs will be included in this project.
(see enclosed application forms)
III. &
IV. PROJECT DURATION
This will be an on-going project. The Andover City
Council believes that programs that serve low to
moderate income families/individuals should receive
some level of funding from the COBG funds annually.
V. This project would address the problems of services for
senior citizens, handicapped individuals and services
for the homeless.
VI. The Andover City Council proposes to use in 1990 for
public service programming. Total dollars spent will
depend upon the number and amount of the requests
received by the City.
. .'
~)
~)
Page 2
Andover COBG Proposal
February 22, 1990
VII. Advertising for Proposals
$
$
50
o
City Council Review & Approval
Amount of Public Service Funds Awarded
$14,401
VIII. Because this project will be a City-wide effort, it is
impossible to determine at this time, the number of
households that will be incorporated into this project.
The actual figures will be determined once awards have
been made and reports from subrecipiants have been
received.
IX. Andover believes that its financial involvement in
public service program funding is vital to the growth
of services required for a growing community. Andover
recognizes the need for programs that serve both local
and regional clientele and this effort is part of the
overall effort to fund public service programs
throughout the twin cities metropolitan area.
Andover
X. ~~ City planner is the project contact person.
Andover
XII. ~~, City Planner and william G. Hawkins, City
Attorney are the individuals authorized to request
reimbursements for project expenses.
XIII. PROJECT SCHEDULE
July I, 1990 - July 31, 1990
Receive Applications,
City Council Review
August 21, 1990
Funds Awarded
to Public Service
Programs
.:J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
July 3, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Staff, Committee,
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO. Commercial Lot
/0. P
BY:
Planning
The City Council is requested to discuss the proposed purchase of
Lots 3 & 4, Block 1 of the Commercial Park to (1) Emmerich
Construction and/or others for the construction of a medical
distribution company's office warehouse; or (2) Richard and
Marlene Povlitzki for the construction of a supper/night club with
a banquet hall.
(1) Don Emmerich has previously discussed this with the City
Council (April 17, 1990 - see attached minutes). Attached is a
sketch showing their general needs - 35 parking spots, a loading
dock, 12,000 sq. ft. of warehouse with office space.
This was discussed with the Economic Development Committee at
their special meeting of 6/28/90.
(2) Richard Povlitzki discussed the proposed plans for the
supper/night club with the City Council on June 19th. See
attached Council item (6/19/90) from Jay Blake and see minutes not
attached.
The Economic Development Committee met at a special meeting on
June 28th to discuss the proposal for lot purchases of Lots 3 & 4,
Block 1 and Lots 2 & 3, Block 3.
Lots 3 & 4, Block 1 are being considered for purchase by Don
Emmerich and a Bloomington-based medical company and by Richard
and Marlene Povlitzki.
continued
MOTION BY
~J TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
Page Two
~J
Lots 3 & 4, Block 1 Supper Club or Warehouse
The Economic Development Committee was split on the land use but
were firm on the $.65/s.f. with the purchaser paying water and
sewer connection charges when they build.
options the Economic Development Committee considered were
supper club/night club/banquet hall or warehouse/office, both at
$.65/s.f.
There was considerable discussion as to whether this is the proper
location for this type of restaurant/bar/banquet hall land use.
It was concluded that this is the only area in the City that it
would even be practical to allow this activity - late night
traffic and noise being the most troublesome problem.
Lots 2 & 3, Block 3 NW Metal Fabricators
The Economic Development Committee recommended that the City offer
the lots to NW Steel Fabricators for $.65/s.f. and connection
charges and the City would consider assessing the cost of
enclosing the ditch with pipe at an estimated cost of $40,000 to
$56,000.
Lot 2 is 52,400 s.f. at $.65 = $34,060
Lot 3 is 79,700 s.f. at $.65
$51,805
The total purchase price for the two lots at $.65/s.f. is $85,000
plus water and sewer connection charges of about $16,500.
This item was previously discussed at the May 15th Council
meeting.
,J
,
, ):
,~
11. I. M. qr r/t~ WI/~
/lCc7r~;r d/ .fC"r. J1I. U. "~'r~""'D"Y<c1 E'lu1-J.j~L.
0k "J1('"I'..",t.I Co.)
10,'- ~I
/ IV"'?'"!'17 //n~ 0/ "'/7~
Q
@
,n
'.
A/IY //.,1 "/ "'he .s/f/ //4 "'/ .5<:"~..j'4
Z4' f.JitlArnmo/{'s slo.fac.e ...,
r- .~r..r. t'I~ _11_
p,r__-L ~
T~ . ~ .,
'NKER LAfft.
,
--- Uaz :_____
,
~(
I
il i
~U
~.~ E' < 88['
II ':)
v if
~
/:
_~.oo__
,\
, "
,
J90!
f ,88
(1" '..r /lcJT'.r...
.....,
/I,'".r'
T.
:)
:J
Regular City Council Meeting
April 17, 1990 - Minutes
Page 6
,
(Sidewalks/Creekridge/Bent Creek/MSA, Continued)
The Council didn't think it would be necessary to construct the
sidewalk through the parking lot at Bent Creek. They also asked that
the placement along Bunker Lake Boulevard coincide with the county's
plans to update that road. Mr. Haas was asked to provide for specific
drawings for the proposed location of the sidewalks, obtain bids, and
bring It back to the Council with a proposal for funding.
MOTION by Perry, Seconded by Jacobson, to so move. Motion carried
unanimously.
CHANGE POLLING PLACE PRECINCT 3
MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Orttel, a Resolution changing polling
place for Andover Precinct 3 as presented. (See Resolution R046-90)
Motion carried unanimously.
DON EMMERICH/COMMERCIAL LOT PURCHASE
Mr. Blake explained a company located in Bloomington is considering
moving to the Andover Commercial Park or into Blaine. It is a medical
packaging company that packs and ships medical products. He asked for
direction from the Council regarding the price of the lot,
understandl ng the parce I in B I a i ne costs I ess per square foot.
Don Emmerich - stated he was approached by the company regarding
commercial property In Andover. The company currently employs 40
people: however, most of them would not move to Andover, So it will
provide Jobs to local residents, and they are expecting to expand to
65 employees In the next two years. The building will be valued at
about $500,000, slmillar to the Rlccar building. One-third wll I be
wareho~se. one-third will be manufacturing, and one-third will be for
offices. The company packages and ships surgical equipment: there are
no medical wastes and minimal water usage.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Orttel, that we authorize City Staff
and City Attorney to negotiate with Mr. Emmerich. and if need be, the
owner of the industry, and to come back to the Economic Development
Committee with a recommendation on the property and. if need be. at an
earlier then normal scheduled meeting. DISCUSSION: Mr. Emmerich
stated the taxes on the building would be about $24,000 a year. plus
many employees would come from this area. The company Is asking what
can be done for them either In a reduction of the land price to make
it feasible for them to make the move or to help In the moving costs.
He felt it may be to the City's benefit to offer a reduction in the
land price. It is a good. sound Industry with net gross increases of
25 percent o~er the last four to five years. Motion carried
unanimously.
~ f/^-'- ,
, ' (~) .
~ . 1J3;tr~1
~ '
,
l~
~ .; >.Jt
. ~.. ~ .
.-. . .
,. .. ~ .....: ...
'.
"
rh. {-_
." -C-""t'\.lb-JV~ II
T
, '.
"".
~.~ ~_.: /
-0- ,J' . . rp.6r~"''''''(''l?
,'A'-- .'. l-~Ho,h:.
~.: // ,./
T :'S. i IS<Y1'" u
". J :;.00. I ;/
~/ ----.:.... r, / /..
;iy Pt.i'~~,.v'h ~' ; f..:-; '. ' .
'/. " . :~)-j.' /
. "', ",''--.''~ I~t\r;/ /
>- 1 '" '<l.' , / /
,. / /
"-'.. ,., / / /
.. :>:< p ,......./
.' ':./ ......." .;, .' /
~ /.-:,...... ~ ", /
/~, . ~'... ::. /;'. /'
. , 1 '''z ~ w:.D1 ~.., o;a-.
~
~.:.t
~
(-
G)
~?I~......
~J
/ ./
<~
.- ,,-
//'
//
..
...
[
/
t\,
l~:'
<>1,
4C.:,:
.~:
1
~\
c ~'r'l"""~"7
"'"
1
""
~
1f'tI.LIC- Pf>f1L1,.l"l
~ i
'-...,a
n_ -1
U~,-l-,.Y~[.
):J;.J r!-LC".2l),
~pty~e:P 71-:6
':~)
I
;' . ~ .:
", .
: i :11
<J j;l a
","" .'
, i-,-
.____u_ . _ .
-----. _.. ---..
~'"'~LD f1Zcf-l-r r:::.Lf),;L:.:fi C' 1-1-
,J
I,
/ ~ C_~-..r :__J- C~!--->../
1-"
. _..-
f .- ' "
; \.J
"--=
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
June 19, 1990
/ '\
CITY OF ANDOVER
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
BY: Jay Blak?\'CitY planner
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee,
ITEM
NO. povlitzki Lot purchase
I/.
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to review the request of Richard
and Marlene Povlitzki to purchase two lots in the Andover
Commercial Park.
BACKGROUND
The Povlitzki's currently own and operate a successful
restaurant/night club in a neighboring community and hope to open
a similar operation in Andover. They are proposing to construct a
150' by 60 foot building for night club dining. In addition, the
plans include a banquet room for rental purposes. According to
Ordinance 8, Section 7, a restaurant is an allowed use in the GB
General Business district. The liquor license is allowed by a
Special Use Permit.
The two lots under consideration are Lots 3 and 4 of Block 1,
Andover Commercial Park. See the enclosed map. Staff has been
approached by two other business interests regarding these same
lots - medical packaging firm from Bloomington and a
warehouse/industrial rental building. These uses are also allowed
in the GB zoning district.
The proposed purchase price is $.50/square foot or $48,300 for
both parcels. The City's current price is $.65/square foot or
$62,790.
The AEDC has, in the past, been concerned over the placement of a
eating/drinking establishment in the Commercial Park. Prior to
their review, Council may want to provide direction on the sale of
the property.
/
SECOND BY
12~ Cv--
~p
dj!4-' ~
COUNCIL ACTION
,'0
'-
:_)
Page 2
Commercial Park Lot Sale
June 19, 1990
@
'-
COUNCIL OPTIONS
1. The City Council may refer the item to the Andover Economic
Development for review and recommendation.
2. The City Council may agree to sell the property to the
Povlitzki's and direct legal staff to prepare the appropriate
purchase documents.
3. The City Council may choose to not sell the property to the
Povlitzki's for the development of a restaurant/drinking
establishment.
/
I
.~~
: ~
,)
~t~ [{'r} J C; f 0
@
t.--
z~ Ihrn OA_JJ..z.u. 6["~ Crzu~-<-b - d!/z E/7/<-ev'
cJ ~;u;tc. ,:t~. ~ ~ ~
t'7V OZ - / tU/I..v jlAc:O /A1 ~/VW. ') Jw-1 '
I
ct rYt- "3 J- ;t vJ:;- <f- ~ ~ ~
fJJ~ i~ ~
~
F:::
Ld~___l. .~.
1 lor Lf t-:
I 3 f.t C/i (f'.4(.. 7t.?)-
. ~~ ~;~{J~r1~rr
~ t~ c<ffic~ %' ~c-r::; ~/J.;;tc/, _
J &v~ "u.L;I::1 ~ C0 ~_~dud)
{~ 0. .Jx~ /U~ . :Me. p:i2. -;U AU
~'-P' ~o-cJ ~ & ~ . 1/d <!:jrJ / ~
~ /i:<-k ~ J/,J~"
~ de. A7f/V~1- ~ 'c~'-I< ~ 0 .( (, 0
. ~ ~ {l)~~crV~F
~;vIJ. AI ~ ~f {I .
.jJ ,-~Q ~ ;t(., ~Jf"c~ ~ cr '
~ Wt~k{p ~~~ I~~
.J ~J~ /
J M.J2 ~ !-tv!:- AU\ffU ~ ~ pJL Lw-vU
r!-UJ; /)UIL ~LuP - ~ ~ ICf' ~ {} -
:JI,~
Ilu ~ (JU(LIJ~~7tL.
/11 tulh"v (} n/!Jt:??
Bu.V' -# 1'i'Lf- '7// ()
/Lu) -tI '7 i'" tJ, 3 '717
'/
~
;:J
, I
!!
\J
Regular City Council Meeting
May IS, 1990 - Minutes
Page 9
APPROVE RESOLUTION/MWCC REFUND PROGRAM
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded by Jacobson, to so move. <See Resolution
R062-90 requesting the Metropol itan Waste control Commission refund to
the City of Andover all Sewer Availability Charges paid for properties
located outside the City anticipated year 2000 Municipal Urban Service
Area boundary) Motion carried unanimously.
CAPITAL BUDGET
Mayor Ell ing asked for a motion to table the item to a full Councl I.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by ~night. to so move. Motion carried
unanimously.
LOT PURCHASE/NORTHWEST STEEL FABRICATORS
Mr. Blake reviewed the proposal from Northwest Steel Fabricators to
p~rchase Lots 2 and 3 In the Commercial Park for $70,000, which comes
to about 50 cents per square foot. It also requires the City to close
the ditch between the lots. which he estimated would cost $14,000.
The net result of the sale would be about 40 cents per square foot for
the two lots.
Counci Imember Jacobson reported the consensus of the Economic
Development Committee was not to go below 50 cents a square foot,
including al I extra costs. Mayor El ling also noted the medical
company looking at two other lots has told him they are receiving
substantial financial incentives from other cities, asking if Andover
wants to consider further help such as landscaping, etc.
Councilmember Orttel thought that it could be argued that the covered
drainage pipe for the lots being considered by Northwest Steel
Fabricators should have been put in at the time of the plat.
It was generally agreed the Staff and City Attorney should negotiate
with Northwest Steel Fabricators, but they did not want to go below 50
cents per square foot, including the cost of the covered drainage
pipe. Mr. Blake noted there are construction funds remaining from the
project that could be used to put in that pipe.
Counci I also suggested that when looking at the medical distribution
company, that any further financial Incentives be tied to the number
of new jobs being created. They suggested the EDC look at that Item
further.
IIU \ C I
: - I
i.&!~2'-=~__.J
I '
ill
. "."
I~<
I I
I
'-.J · ~ ~ U · L' ,.. I
~ I I
~ L. _ _ _ _-l..!!.."'Q'J":'~'!, __ .J
L' It I
,.... I : · 8!.
I: 2 ri1
Ii. ~I
'" Q I
,~.~ I
,,' ~
I ft:; ,'l
/~~
/ ... .~
,-- ~I
J::'-~_.
--___/J21.01_____
N89.00' 49"W
I@)
I ':l
I
I .
r :
I, ·
. .
I'" .,
.....~
I.. ~
r~ ~ ,...
f ' ~
I~
.'
---
. I
.1
I
r
,
I
I
: I
. I
. I
I,
I .
r : ,
I,'
--
"SCUTHtL/~ ~ ~ N'JII I~
. II . " . ~ .
I \~ -= f.D ... D ' . ,-- ~ -22 -~
: N LJ dEL IJH:> -. -_. _._- ..
Q
___.-.:...=n
.~~)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE "T,,':,''7.' ~~o
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee,
.~~.
ITEM 1/.
NO. CDBG Grant Analysis
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
BY: Jay Blak~Planner
APPROVE~OR
AGEN~ I }'j
BY: ,f)
)
REQUEST
The Andover city Council is asked to review the enclosed
analysis of the CDBG grants that were received.
BACKGROUND
The City has $14,401 available for the grants and $16,960 in
requests. Due to the discrepancy, staff organized a ranking
procedure to assist in the selection of the grants. Seven
criteria were established and a weighted points system assigned to
each criteria.
There are two ways in which the City of Andover may disperse the
funds. The City may consider granting smaller requests to all
applicants or the City may award the grants to the top ranking
applications until funds are depleted. Since all applicants are
also receiving funds from Anoka County, JoAnn Wright must monitor
the grants from the agencies.
The following chart summarizes the results of my rankings:
ORGANIZATION REQUEST POINTS
North Suburban Kinship $2,000 26 points
North Suburban Counseling $4,000 24 points
Anoka County CAP $5,460 27 points
Alexandra House $2,500 25 points
Rise Inc. $3,000 23 points
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
,J TO
SECOND BY
<--)
Page 2
July 17, 1990
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the grants be awarded in the order of
ranking and that the lowest ranking grant application receiving a
portion of their request until funds are depleted per the
following schedule:
North Suburban Kinship
North Suburban Counseling
Anoka County CAP
Alexandra House
Rise Inc.
J
$2,000
$4,000
$5,460
$2,500
$ 441
Total 14,401
/)
'-/
SUMMARY OF CDBG GRANT REQUESTS
PROGRAM NAME
FUNDS REQUESTED
MATERIALS SUBMITTED
North Suburban
Kinship Inc.
?( 000
v~~
RANKING PROCEDURE
1 2 3 4 r2
2. How urgent is the need?
1 2 3 (0 5
3. How significant is the potential impact from the project?
1 2 3 C) 5
4 . How well will it serve residents of Andover?
1 2 3 0 5
5. How large is the total population served by the project?
1 - Small 0- Large 0 - Unclear
6. Is the population se r,ved mostly low/mod. income?
o - No or Unclear Q- Yes
7. ' Does the organization have sufficient funding from other
sources?
1 - Yes or Unclear @- No
Total Points Received from Ranking Sheet 20
~)
:J
Page 2
CDBG Grant Analysis
PROGRAM NAME
FUNDS REQUESTED
MATERIALS SUBMITTED
North Suburban
Counseling
4-1 000
ves
RANKING PROCEDURE
Circle 5 for high, 1 for low or unclear from application
1. How clear is the request for funds?
1 2 3 4 (5)
-/
2 . How urgent is the need?
1 2 Q 4 5
3. How significant is the potential impact from the project?
1 2 <0 4 5
4 . How well will it serve residents of Andover?
1 2 3 0 5
5. How large is the total population served by the project?
1 - Small 0- Large 0 - Unclear
6 . Is the population served mostly low/mod. income?
0 - No or Unclear DYes
7. Does the organization have sufficient funding from other
sources?
1 - Yes or Unclear
@- No
2f
Total Points Received from Ranking Sheet
~J
:J
~J
Page 3
COBG Grant Analysis
PROGRAM NAME
FUNDS REQUESTED
MATERIALS SUBMITTED
Anoka County Community
Action program
~, 4-Ct, 'D
RANKING PROCEDURE
yes
Circle 5 for high, 1 for low or unclear from application
1. How clear is the request for funds?
1
2
3
4
2. How urgent is the need?
1
o
2
3
Q
5
2
3
3. How significant is the potential impact from the project?
5
1
0)
4 .
How well will it serve residents of Andover?
1
2
3
4
Sl
5. How large is the total population served by the project?
1 - Small ~- Large 0 - Unclear
6. Is the population served mostly low/mod. income?
o - No or Unclear (22- Yes
7. Does the organization have sufficient funding from other
sources?
1 - Yes or Unclear ~- No
Total Points Received from Ranking Sheet ~;Z
:_)
Page 4
CDBG Grant Analysis
PROGRAM NAME
FUNDS REQUESTED
MATERIALS SUBMITTED
Alexandra House
z/ Sl) 0
v.e'j
RANKING,PROCEOURE
Circle 5 for high, 1 for low or unclear from application
1. How clear is the request for funds?
1 2 3 4 f)
2. How urgent is the need?
1 2 3 4 (2
3 . How significant is the potential impact from the project?
1 2 3 0 5
4 . How well will it serve residents of Andover?
1 2 3 9 5
5. How large is the total population served by the project?
(] Small 3 - Large 0 Unclear
6. Is the population served mostly low/mod. income?
o - No or Unclear ~ Yes
7. Does the organization have sufficient funding from other
sources?
1 - Yes or Unclear
0NO
2S
Total Points Received from Ranking Sheet
,J
: )
Page 5
CDBG Grant Analysis
PROGRAM NAME
FUNDS REQUESTED
MATERIALS SUBMITTED
Rise Inc.
3,000
y-es
RANKING PROCEDURE
Circle 5 for high, 1 for, low or unclear from application
1. How clear is the request for funds?
1 2 3 4 Q
2. How urgent is the need?
1 2 0
3. How significant is the potential
1 2 0)
4 . How well will it serve residents
1 2 Q
4
5
impact from the project?
4
5
of Andover?
4
5
5. How large is the total population served by the project?
1 - Small ~ Large 0 - Unclear
6. Is the population served mostly low/mod. income?
o - No or Unclear ~- Yes
7. Does the organization have sufficient funding from other
sources?
1 - Yes or Unclear 3J- No
Total Points Received from Ranking Sheet ~3
.' '\
''-~
Total Funds Requested: $ /(P I ~fo 0
Funds Available: $ /~ cI()/
'\
'-~)
')
I
r "
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
\"j
DATE July 3. 1990
ITEM Approve Election Judges
NO. 12 .
BY:
V. VOlktJ!
APPR~~ED 'lFOR
AGENDr'l /
B~
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee, Comm.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
The city Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution
approving election judges for the special election July 17, 1990.
MOTION BY
:J TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO. R
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING JUDGES FOR THE SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON JULY 17, 1990 IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby resolves:
The persons as shown below are hereby appointed judges for the
special election to be held on Tuesday, July 17, 1990 in the City
of Andover:
Precinct 1, Grace Lutheran Church
Leone Struvwe DFL
Wanda Grant IR
Micki Harris IR
Carol Santer DFL
Precinct 2, Crooked Lake Elementary School
Ellen Wirkus DFL
Cleo Smith IR
Maureen Bushard- DFL
Precincts 3, Andover Elementary School
Mary West DFL
Karen Peterson - IR
Eleanor Apel DFL
Precinct 4, Family of Christ Lutheran Church
Esther Haas IR
Cindy Brostrom - OFL
Susan Rylander - DFL
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of , 1990.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Attest:
James E. Elling - Mayor
,~ Victoria Volk - City Clerk
'~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
July 3, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee,
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
13. Authorization/
Frank Stone
~
Public works
Residents are calling in complaints every day to have roads mowed,
many because grass at intersections is so long they can't see
vehicles approaching from the other direction.
At this time, we are finding it impossible to keep the parks
mowed. I'm getting complaints that the parks have never looked so
bad! We have two full-time people and one summer help in parks
giving us 120 hours a week and they do a very good job for having
to maintain 34 parks.
All other departments are also running behind so, there is no one
else to mow the ditches.
Parks staff are also mowing unmowed lawns that come in as weed
complaints. Every year a greater amount of time is spent mowing
these properties.
I would like to take $7,000 out of the streets & Highways Budget
and contract someone to mow City ditches and to mow private
properties called in as weed complaints. The cost of weed mowing
is billed to the property owner or certified to the taxes in
October by the city Clerk.
COUNCIL ACTION
,J
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
: )
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
July 3, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee,
'~~~~n
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.. / Resignation of Planninc
/"1. Commission Member
BY:
Po C!...h,."'n+-~
APPRO~ D\ OR
AGENql'A' \
~
BY: Jij}
,
Administration
The City Council is requested to accept the resignation of Donald
L. Spotts as a Commissioner effective July 1, 1990.
At the April 17, 1990 Council meeting, when Bill Coleman was
appointed to the Commission, Steve Jonak was appointed as an
alternate.
I talked to Steve and he is still willing to serve as a member.
MOTION BY
\
-j TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
':J
.June 25, 1990
Dear- Si r:
I am submitting my resignation as a commission member of the Plfmning
[, Zoning of Andover effective July 1, 1990.
\1'18 are moving to anottler comrnunity and tllerefor-e \'vi1l no longer be
an effective member of the this group,
I am proud to have served thi s speci a 1 gr-oup as our future
development depends on nle cooperation of both the planning and zoning
anlj the city council to enhance planne,j and pr-oper grovith of our city.
Respect.fully,
f)fl1d- -( ~
Dona I d L. Spotts
DLS/cac
~J
On.Site Environmental Services
7308 Aspen Lane N.
Suite 144
Minneapolis, MN 55428
612493-3424
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
July 3, 1990
ITEM Receive 1989 Audit
NO. . Report
. ,. IS:
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
Howard Koolick ~
BY: Finance Director
REQUEST
APP~V,EO\FOR
AGE.... ",. :
II /
V/V
BY/ /
/
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion Items
The Andover City Council is requested to receive the 1989
audited financial statements and auditor's opinion.
BACKGROUND
The City has completed the 1989 financial statements and
the City's auditing firm, George M. Hanson and Company has
completed their audit of these statements. The report that
was included in your packet is the product of this audit.
City Council is requested to receive this report to allow the
proper publication and submission to the state as required by
state statute. The auditor will be scheduled to appear at a
future meeting to discuss the report and any recommendations they
may have.
Council may wish to schedule a work session to meet with the
auditor to allow a more detailed discussion.
MOTION BY
'\
._ / TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
<J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
July 3, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY:
APPROVEllj;FOR
AG A
BY, t
Engineering ~rr
ITEM
NO.
If.,.
Award Bid/90-2/
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
bid and awarding contract for the improvement of Project No. 90-2
for street construction in the area of 164th Avenue/163rd
Lane/Jonquil street.
The results of the bids were as follows:
1. W.B. Miller, Inc.
2. Buck Blacktop, Inc.
3. Bituminous Consulting
$60,995.50
$64,957.00
$65,301. 50
Only three bids were received at the time of the bid opening.
The estimate from the feasibility report for construction was
$54,475.
The bids, as received, will cause the proposed assessments to
exceed the estimated cost by about 11% if we assess in 1990.
The estimated assessment was $4290/unit. The estimated assessment
using the bid is $4765/unit; a difference of $475/unit. About
$200 is due to the bituminous pavement costs being higher than
estimated. The remainder is in restoration. More restoration was
required than estimated in the feasibility report.
We have also proposed more of the restoration to be sod rather
than seed. We are doing this based on the dissatisfaction of
seeding when we did 164th Lane just to .the north of this project.
I recommend that the property owner be notified for a hearing on
July 17th to consider if they want the Council to proceed.
Possibly we can do more seeding in the restoration than sodding.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
.,
'J TO
SECOND BY
:)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIOS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 90-2 FOR STREET CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA
OF 164TH AVENUE/163RO LANE/JONQUIL STREET.
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement
Council Resolution No. 072-90, dated
19 90 , bids were received, opened and
wi~esults as follows:
for bids as set out in
June 5
tabulated according
,
to law
1. W.B. Miller, Inc.
$60,995.50
$64,957.00
$65,301.50
2. Buck Blacktop, Inc.
3. Bituminous Consulting
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate W.B.
Miller, Inc. as being the apparent low bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into a contract with W.B. Miller, Inc. in the
amount of $60,995.50 for construction of the
improvements; and dlrect the City Clerk to return to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until
the contract has been executed and bond requirements met.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
Meeting this 3rd day of
City Council at a
July
Regular
, 19-2Q, with Councilmen
voting in favor of
voting
the resolution, and Councilmen
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
James E. Elling - Mayor
:) ATTEST:
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
:J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
July 3, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
'(1;((
BY:
ITEM 17.
NO. Receive Feasibility
Re ort 90 14
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
the feasibility report and ordering a public hearing for project
90-14, Cedar Crest Estates 3rd Addition/Cedar Hills River Estates
area.
The area that has petitioned for improvement of streets (Part 1)
includes 12 lots and the N 1/2 (1/2 unit) of Lot 6 of Cedar Crest
3rd Addition. Lot 6 has been assessed for 100 feet at $17 per
foot. The N 1/2 of the lot would be assessed 1/2 unit to complete
the street to the north of the property. The report does not
include this lot and should be included.
Also, the large parcel on the west and south side of the cul-de-
sac of 176th Avenue is not included in the proposed assessment.
The lot is generally low and in the flood fringe area. possibly
this lot should be assessed 1 unit.
The Council should address this.
The parcel will be notified of the public hearing.
The proposed date of the hearing is on July 17, 1990 at 8:01 P.M.
Part II is part of the report but was not included in the
petition. Does the City Council want to notify those properties
in Part II?
MOTION BY
,J TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
:J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING PUBLIC HEARING
ON IMPROVEMENTS OF STREET CONSTRUCTION , PROJECT NO. 90-14 IN
THE CEDAR CREST ESTATES THIRD ADDITION/CEDAR HILLS RIVER ESTATES
AREA.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. R073-90, adopted the
day of June , 19 90 , a Feasibility Report has been
by BRA for the improvements; and
WHEREAS, such report was received by the City Council on the
3rd day of July , 19 90 ; and
5th
prepared
WHEREAS, such report declared the proposed improvement to be
feasible for an estimated cost of $67,460.00 Part I, $40,760 Part II.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover that:
1. The City Council hereby accepts the Feasibility Report for
Project No. 90-14 , for the improvements.
2. The Council will consider the improvements in accordance
with the report and the assessment of abutting property
for all or a portion of the improvement pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost
of the improvement of $67,460.00 Part I, $40,760 Part II.
3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed
improvement on the 17th day of July , 19 90 in
the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 8:01 P.M. and the
Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such
hearing and improvement as required by law.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
day of
Council at a
Meeting this
19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
,)
Victoria volk - City Clerk
1477.97
2706.42
:~
54.6%
9 yes
2 no
3 unknown
~ )
'--
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
July 3, 1990
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
M~n _n~ ~~..<'<'~ ~n TL
Engineering
APPAt(~ED FO..R
A~1:NI
~ '-
BY: I
/
ITEM
NQ Approve Plans & Specs/
Ii? 90 12 (sidewalks)
.-('1 <<
BY: 'T'~r1r1:, u___
The city Council is requested to approve the resolution approving
final plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bid
for Project 90-12, Bent Creek Estates.
The plans and specs are in the Engineering Department for your
review.
The opening of bids is scheduled for July 27, 1990 at 10:00 A.M.
,. .,
'_J
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
: )
-)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 90-12, BENT CREEK ESTATES
FOR SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. R053-90, adopted by the City
Council on the 1st day of May , 1990, BRA
has prepared final plans and specifications for project 90-12
for Sidewalk construction; and
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications were presented to
the City Council for their review on the 3rd day of
July , 1990.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to
hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as
required by law, with such bids to be opened at 10:00 A.M.
Friday, July 27 , 19 90 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted
day of
by the City Council at a Regular
Meeting this
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution and
Councilmen
voting against same
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
:J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
July 3, 1990
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
"'~n_n;~~..~~'~n T"
Engineering
APPROV~\ FOR
AGt(}-
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ITEM
NO. Approve Plans & Specs/
19. 90 13 (sidewalks)'
~rr
BY: ",~rlrl"T u~
y
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving
final plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bids
for Project 90-13, Creekridge Estates,
The plans and specs are in the Engineering Department for your
review.
The opening of bids is scheduled for July 27, 1900 at 10:00 A.M.
MOTION BY
,.J TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
:)
',J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT NO. 90-13, CREEKRIDGE ESTATES
FOR SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. R054-90, adopted by the City
Council on the 1st day of Mar ' 1990, BRA
has prepared final plans and speciflcations for Project 90-13
for Sidewalk construction; and
WHEREAS, such final plans and specifications
City Council for their review on the 3rd
July , 1990.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover to
hereby approve the Final Plans and Specifications .
the
were presented to
day of
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby direct the City Clerk to seek public bids as
required by law, with such bids to be opened at 10:00 A.M. ,
Friday, July 27 , 19 90 at the Andover City Hall.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted
by the city Council at a
Regular
Meeting this
day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution and
Councilmen
voting against same
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
July 3, 1990
DATE
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Non-Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
'\S~
I
APP~~ED \FoR
AGEN'Z, 6
N
BY: ~/
/
,
/
ITEM Release Grading Escrow,
NQ Red Oaks Manor 6th
..? O.
BY: 'I'nrlrl:T ~;>;>~
v
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution approving
the grading of Red Oaks Manor 6th Addition.
The City staff has hired Lot Surveys, Inc. to review the grading
of the developers. In your packet are the elevations taken by Lot
Surveys and compared with the grading plan submitted by the
developer along with the required letter requested by the City
from the Project Engineer, Ken Gust.
The City Engineering and Public Works Departments have been
continuously working with the developers to remove soil from
sanitary and storm sewer manhole covers for the past two months.
All utility manhole covers have been exposed. The grading and
seeding adjacent to the utilities have been completed.
Approving the resolution will release the escrow for grading only.
Staff will review to ensure that there is enough escrow held by
the City for other items (signs, legal fees, etc. and to pay Lot
Surveys).
The developer will be required to monitor erosion control, keep
streets clear of any debris and mow boulevard area to control weed
growth.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
:) TO
SECOND BY
,)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL GRADING OF REO OAKS MANOR 6TH
ADDITION AS BEING DEVELOPED BY ART RAUOIO AND NORM HOLM IN
SECTION 34-32-24.
WHEREAS, the developer has completed grading of Red Oaks
Manor 6th Addition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to hereby approve the grading of Red Oaks Manor
6th Addition.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of
, 1990.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
James E. Elling - Mayor
Victoria volk - City Clerk
~)
(J
,)
Ken Gust Enterprises
8590 Quarles Road
Maple Grove, MN 55369
January 22, 1990
Grading Status Memorandum
From:
To:
Subject:
Ken Gust - Engineer ~~~~~_()~__
Whom it may concern ,~~:~~
Red Oaks 6th -Andover, MN
This letter is to inform you that grading for the subject
project is generally in conformance with the approved grading
plan.
The final grading to meet the development plan grades is the
responsiblity of each builder and the surveyor has informed
me that all lots are within 1 foot of minimum garage or
walkout elevation.
The grading plan and subsequent devlopment plan were prepared
under my supervision, however, the earthwork was accomplished
by the owner with observations and testing by a soils
engineering firm. Therefore, my responsiblity does not cover
the quality of earth material used for fill in the building
areas.
Apri I 3, 1990
/ "
\.._J
I agree to be responsible for the
pertaining to the hill and trees.
completed within the summer of
~J' M~,v~
Tom Moran
13767 Quinn Street N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
~)
feJ C#t<s il7.v-.#lt ~fl, AJ./",
~~,,d-'7
landscaping of my back yard
The landscaping will be
LOT SURVEYS COMPANY
,. '\
<. ,RAYMOND A. PRASCH
~ MINN. REG. NO. 6743
LAND SURVEYORS
REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA
7601 -73rd Avo. No,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428
560-3093
March 13, 1990
Mr. Todd Haas
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
Re: RED OAKS MANOR 6TH ADDITION
Dear Todd:
I have compared the centerline profiles on the above plat
with the elevations on the development plan. The existing
street grades appear to agree with the profile grades and in
most cases are higher than the proposed grades on the
development plan.
This means that all house pad grades had to be higher and any
rear grades draining to the street also have to be higher.
This means that the development plan can not work.
It appears that all building pads are high enough to drain.
Lots 2 and 3, Block 3 are low but are vacant and possibly
kept down until construction. Lot 1, Block 3 is very high but
appears to be the original homesite. Lot 16, block 2,
appears to be high possibly to save trees.
The exterior boundary grades seem to match adjoining grading
as shown on the development plan.
The front corners of Lots 11, 12 and 13, Block 2 could be
lowered to permit drainage unto Partridge Street.
Please look over the grades and call if you have any
quest ions.
;' "
....-j
52" erely; !2'
/"
/" 0 .,
Lym~21'A:~~cCZ ~:";.-~
RAP/tp