Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFebruary 21, 20131685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US Regular Park & Recreation Commission Meeting February 21, 2013 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Resident Forum 3. Approval of Minutes (2/7/13) 4. Review Mark Smith Sketch Plan 5. Update of Green Acres Park Improvements 6. Discuss Crooked Lake School Hockey Rink 7. Update on the Evos Equipment 8. Update of Master Plan of Sports Complex/12 -31, Cont. 9. Outstanding Items 10. 11. Chair's Report 12. Adjournment 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.. ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Park & Recreation Commission CC: David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public Works /City Engineerva FROM: Todd J. Haas, Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: 4. Review Mark Smith Sketch Plan DATE: February 21, 2013 INTRODUCTION The Park and Recreation Commission is requested to review and determine the park dedication requirements for the proposed Mark Smith Sketch Plan. DISCUSSION A copy of the sketch plan is in your side pocket of the packet for your review. The sketch plan does indicate the existing park boundaries of Hickory Meadows Park along with the additional park property the developer would like to dedicate to the city which would be adjacent to the existing Hickory Meadows Park. The location of a park in this area was suggested by the Commission during the sketch plan review back in 2006. Staff has attached a copy of the Park Commission agenda item and minutes from September 7, 2006 for your information. Staff has reviewed the sketch plan and recommends not taking any more property then is necessary to fulfill the future planned improvements that are identified in the Future Facilities Chart (see attachment) for Hickory Meadows Park. The attached are drawing identifies a smaller area which may accomplish the goal of the park which could include enough area for a small shelter and a half basketball court. Any property the Commission requests to be dedicated will be calculated based on the formula as per City Code 11 -3 -7 (C). Just so the Commission knows, the more land required to be dedicated the lesser the park dedication fee portion will be. ACTION REQUIRED The Park and Recreation Commission is requested to review the proposed preliminary plat and give direction as to park dedication requirements to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Todd J. aas cc: Mark Smith, Property Owner /Developer (copy sent be e -mail) Attachments: Future Park Facilities Chart, September 7, 2006 meeting minutes and Mark Smith Sketch Plan (side pocket of packet)✓ I W c 00 CL U 11J 9 o � s i m � ti ti w o I r I' 15 N33VDd313 t51i33y�ya;3 � w I i� I C I¢ i i I i t I N i FRaiRfE RD 1 .06 se __ ✓G � v � C � ui ry is N33a�e3n3 i 917J tw 1 t V .06 se __ ✓G � v � C � ui ry 1_ ^r 11 'i I ;�� - �' � ; •rv�`� bbd y aN r E v N 7 L O H � r_ U 7 N y � C. �(U m ti R .0 ow � C c C U O v 0 U C j d O r •� v > cc E y O` itN ~ N D O r N 0- r o E O mE p '0- N U C O � y � N T� C O c, a) EL m 00 C C E r O (U Q O � E U� C�1 y r >� U CZ -2 E L 1 oca U y m ` CZ �v boa >U Eon U N O C-5 a I 5 r o c cCr c7 e- ! r y O C C'I r7 U � C U 07 i 1_ ^r 11 'i I ;�� - �' � ; •rv�`� bbd y aN r E v N 7 L O H � r_ U 7 N y � C. �(U m ti R .0 ow � C c C U O v 0 U C j d O r •� v > cc E y O` itN ~ N D O r N 0- r o E O mE p '0- N U C O � y � N T� C O c, a) EL m 00 C C E r O (U Q O � E U� C�1 y r >� U CZ -2 E L 1 oca U y m ` CZ �v boa >U Eon U N O C-5 a I 5 r o c cCr c7 e- ! r y O C C'I r7 U � C U 07 D LO t m m m 7 m Cd u i�y rr d 1",x"J1 O C'd rr�T� FBI w >C r� N r r r [I L- 0 m X W 0I000�00000 0oio�oo 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CL 0 `O 0 0 0 0 0 OHO 0 0 N 0 O 0 ON 0 �0 0 0 0 0.O u7 U 0 0 C C 0 0 0 O O -. Lj Lj �p p 0 N N nN 0 0 r O Cf) ( N r N a J a � f , o f r K! f9 Ui fA 69 69I fig E9 fA 69 to 69 » to ea W f ,: Q � • Q Q � w w w C c�= [ U � F � w ca m 6 Iw 0 w i= d m O w ( o w w J U 1= F N F N � � �t F a' a' k t C Q a :. U a V 0 y LL t k _U 0 LL LL 13 N y a 3 o F c p 3 a U) m cc CJ ui O . C L p) C U U •C o O V v Y N C CIL 5 m J p- U Q C Y { {{FF m I. C Y U d gC ¢U E m° y .0 _ @ y 0m5 �1N "C n f = r E N N ;J .J m rL fn Z CL 3u' 1 I p ri F f wN COG) ? OD o0000000000000000000000�noM OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO rn �pom boo °o °o W iri n cri�ouicd�ridodui6ui06ci n QI O O O O N O O O N O N N O O V O N U7 N O N ddooui0it-0 O L O a O 01 o n n v M u) tt n O 11) CA '� O O G U O O <7 O w r' n N CD M O LL7 n M W r M O f` y ; N (L O rn LO N m N m N r CV 0 V .r- tD s: ` r tnD r 3 fR 49 69 1A 69 69 Cfl 69 to b% CH 6% 19 69169 69 C9 CA to Hf fA 69 1H 69 W) 1-1 69 69 b9 *0 °y s3 lfl ifl N W U ' CMp• Lo T ch 0 a s: co co F F r ti N Z CANN I� FN IN O Q 4' Y y O W c O U C rN U Q c c a d rnI w mOO u E poa�vd�a m ?c1 0 U N E m 3 `1 ° c O1 3 a 'O o o m 'O o n° C 1 @ E _7 Ol. •j O ..• y rY c C iZ WE E o y -p a r y rn c ._ ` m U m c a rn a y 4) U o d c m m v ? C m u n d Q p m a m C p N aci m a t c U c C O U c 10 a C. O U �C LL j y ,H > {Y N CO .0 3 3 a- m y O V v m p t 7 o LL y a) v y y 0 U 0 0 U y° C y -o Y m c O x ` y y c UO m C m E m p> E _ z a Y r E E m a c Nv rnrnd c`�mcain Oo p-1aFL) gc Z0 a�ma,CO1vuc� �ca�.�� d -- caFimoY� `° �•- wwvsmaL ;i xc'cyxcccla�— l` 0I . 7 m 3 fD v -Eco m aU 0 O om �0 m •� m O J m CO ;p r a LL Cp C1. O1 fn U C1 F N r . U) fnn (n m - N m fn O f1 CO = F 000 N c0 M r O Q1 %� N LL U N �[ Z _ } 2 = ITT to U f' d f'- • tp M CO r r V .M- r d' r�0 r N r f`tp N r 0 m X W 38.9..1/ 32 '001 - 80.0 $010 80.0 38.9 / 6.a 19 I 91, AREA _ 0 18,866 aok-i I .1 /� ' �� i " _ �' 30.0 II $1.0 48.5 '�C1 142.1' ARE I II N AEA = AREA =0 0 I AREA - ��' �?� J- - REA 12,01 (0 11.,406 M 12,705 I �cO .11,973 20i 1-1 13 A140.0 - fo SV27 100.1 / �n h AREA 33.0 41 13,5451 \ ( 1 go. 6 � - 3 v I 1 y AREA = 1 1 13,330 1 1 1 1 \ I \ \ I 1 60.0 \ AEA \ DEMO 60.0 . 30.3 AR \ 1 R 45 r I EX.HSE °� / 8815 1 \ \ \\ \ _ _ 0 - AR" � �v� �v �� &DRIVE.' � �' , �v ° v� �qD vv � =� 144TH AVE NW �v EA =W 11;4v30 �:, - 9 / �= 1 �_ 83.2 co 80.2 AREA �� AREA N \ 0 �� ���, '-14,454 P _ IAI( \� - -��1 `AREA` - I / \ cr 14"050 � 1 5 / < + 1 \ vv v� 7 AREA = �\ \ ado 7 13,756 \ 71.7 \ - - ---- 130.0 C.4 AREA 381\ �- -AREA � co _ _ co 8 _ 11,4 \ \\ \ AREA = �� �. / r 45.994 13 .0 X135.0\ � n 0 ��AREAyL 1 0 0 Sri 9 AREA = Ln 11,475,-- 2/ 90 0� c 90.0 .. ` 11,401. a0 - V // 2 135.0 FR GE AREA \ _ / �i AREA =_ LO �cRE7C = /11 n 12, 705 k S 12,7 85 >, AREA C3 t0 - .13,022 ' j/ 13,171 rn \ 1\ ( 60.0 r 29.481.2 3� Il \ 9 (` 114.5 11 90 \0 i 90.0 0 o ./ ..- I 0 \ \ I 80.0 l 80.01 80.0 g 117.4 33.2 30.0 F AREA - � AREA = - w AREA r J AREA - ` r 13,889 8 o ARE�� 57,332. "� 49,20&- Q; 942 _ 54.-42, 12 N CV 0) 9 f0 w z 13 9,. � , = _ _ I DENO T) 0° 0 AREA - ,... 11,4 0 ! C NCEPTU 7 \`� ' '� LAYO 1 C I T Y O F U J -plo NDOVE 4t, r,-Y, ew do too - pIg PARSAND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING — SEPTEMBER 7, 2006 AIEVUTES The regular Bi- monthly Meeting of the Andover Park and Recreation Commission was called to order by Chair Masloski on September 7, 2006, 7:30 p.m., at Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW, Andover, Minnesota. Commissioners Present: Chair Dan Masloski, Wendy Albee, Jeremy Boyer, Dave Blackstad (arrived at 7:38 p.m.), Jim Lindahl, Bill Hupp, and Ernest Bedor Commissioners Absent: None Also Present: Parks Coordinator, Todd Haas RESIDENTS FORUM There were no comments at this time. APPROVAL OFMiNUTES Motion by Commissioner Bedor, seconded by Commissioner Albee, to approve the August 17, 2006 Park Commission minutes as presented.. Motion carried on a 6 -ayes, 0- nays, 1- absent (Blackstad) vote. CONSIDER PARgDEDICATIONREQUIREMENT S/HICSORYhiI Parks Coordinator Haas revisited the background from a previous meeting. The site was in the Southwest portion of the City on Andover Boulevard. There had been some adjustments from the sketch plan presented 1.5 years ago. Chair Masloski asked for clarification if there were three developers involved, or if the plan represented two of the three. Parks Coordinator Haas responded that currently one property owner is developing Hickory Meadows. The property owner on the east side adjacent to the plat does not have an agreement to sell their property at this point He indicated that a recommendation was needed for Council as to what the park dedication should be. Chair Masloski inquired about the number of lots projected. Bruce Carlson, developer of Hickory Meadows, stated there were 150 lots with very low density at about 1.5 lots/acre. © Parks Coordinator Haas stated there were also a lot of wetlands on the site. Regular Andover Park and Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes —September 7, 2006 Page 2 Bruce Carlson introduced himself and stated that he was with Kodiak Development and Kodiak Homes. He presented the preliminary plat and indicated that a trail is going to be considered along the creek, which will for the most part be located within the designated 100 -year flood area. If those lots were removed, the developer could lose about $600,000.00. Commissioner Bedor stated that the floodplain could be built upon, it would just need insurance ance to cover it. Parks Coordinator Haas responded that according to the City Codes, no one could build on a floodplain until the area has been removed from the flood hazard area Mr. Carlson stated that his property would be reduced from 44 to 34 lots. Referring to the letter indicating a need for parks, he suggested giving money for Prairie Knoll Park which is about two blocks away, or a park could be shared among all the developer's that all own land in the area. Chair Masloski clarified that the Commission's consensus was a desire for strategically placed parks. Commissioner Lindahl noted that when the plan was first presented, it was not known if it was one parcel or three. In addition, at the time of sketch plan review there were no known designated wetlands. He suggested moving site of the park one block over so it could be shared with the other developers at the west side of the plat. Commissioner Albee questioned the amount of loss Mr. Carlson would have if Lot 10 and Lot 2 were lost. Commissioner Lindabl inquired about the size of Lot 10. Mr. Carlson responded that the lots were 100'x 300' or 100'x 350'. Parks Coordinator Haas clarified that it was just a little less than about 0.5 acres. Mr. Carlson answered that 6.5 acres were wetlands, so the density was 1.5 houses/acre. He was seeking a neighborhood-that was open and had higher end homes. Commissioner Blackstad inquired if Mr. Carlson felt comfortable speaking with the other developers about the possibility of using the two lots for park dedication. Mr. Carlson responded that he would speak with the other developers. Chair Masloski asked if there was a frail or walking path planned. Mr. Carlson answered there was one planned. He stated that they would grade the site and most likely streets and utilities would be installed next year. Parks Coordinator Haas spoke with the City Engineer who indicated that soil borings were needed for the trail. The trail was identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Ea Regular Andover Park and Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes —September 7, 2006 Page 3 Commissioner Blackstad noted that a trail section could be constructed to the Shadowbrook development but will need a bridge as well south of Butternut Street NW to cross Coon Creek Commissioner Lindahl indicated it could eventually extend to Andover Boulevard. Commissioner Albee inquired if that was in addition to the park and trail. Parks Coordinator Haas answered it was in addition to. Chair Masloski suggested that he wanted the trail to be located on the South side from Shadowbrook and connect it to 144th Avenue, which could become a thoroughfare. Parks Coordinator Haas responded that they would consider it because it would make sense. Commissioner Hupp inquired if the trail would extend the full length of the creek. Parks Coordinator Haas answered that it would be the full length over to Prairie Road. Motion by Commissioner Blackstad, seconded by Commissioner Bedor to address Lot 10, and discuss two other lots with the other property owners/developers to the west of Hickory Meadows. Motion carried 7 -ayes, 0 -nays, 0- absent vote. UPDATE OF JOINT MEETING WITH CITY COUNCIL Parks Coordinator Haas mentioned the only change on the agenda was that the Council would not be discussing the question regarding user fee for the fields. REVIEW OUTSTANDING ITEMS Parks Coordinator Haas stated he did speak with the Andover Football Association concerning Prairie Knoll Park parking. The president of the association had previously sent a note to parents to address the parking issue. For Andover Station North ball field facility, irrigation continues to be worked on. The Skateboard Task Force still needs to find a permanent home for the skate park equipment. CHAIR'S REPORT Commissioner Hupp spoke about advertising in the parks with the associate presidents. They were interested in advertising. In addition, Terry Boe from football mentioned if a committee was formed to address advertising, they were interested in participating. Parks Coordinator Haas stated that poles would be delivered next week for the new scoreboards. Commissioner Hupp spoke with a representative of the Minnesota Revolution about advertising. He knew of an irrigation contractor that would be willing to help putting in . A C I T Y NDOVE. i Ri!%L 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 553D4 . (763) 755 -51D0 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Park & Recreation Commission CC: FROM: Todd Haas, Parks Coordinator SUBJECT: 4. Consider Park Dedication Requirements /Hickory Meadovi►s DATE: September 7, 2006 INTRODUCTION This item is in regard to reviewing and determining the park dedication requirements for the proposed preliminary plat of Hickory Meadows. DISCUSSION A copy of the preliminary plat is in your side picket of the packet for review. As you may recall, the Commission did review a sketch plan that included pretty much all of the area south of Andover Boulevard to Coon Creek and between Prairie Road and the East city limits of the City of Andover. ' Attached is the overall sketch plan that was reviewed by the Park Commission back in March of 2005 along with the meeting minutes for your review. . The general location of the park, as suggested by the Commission during the sketch plan review, is identified on the plan. As you can see in looking at the preliminary plat, the developer is not proposing a park. The developer is well aware that a park was recommended as part of the sketch plan. ACTION REQUIRED The Park and Recreation Commission is requested to review the proposed preliminary plat and give direction as to park dedication requirements to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, tol/aas ►,e(f Bruce Carlson, Kodiak Homes Inc., 8512 124th Ln. N., Champlin, MN 55316 G:\ STAFF\ RHONDAAIPARMrTEMS \200610907061item 4.doc anrna��r � jr jum It mlcv- Andover Park & Recreation Commission Meeting sates — March 17, 2005 M3 7. Haas agreed to put this item on the next agenda and a recommendation can then be it to the City Council since a amendment to the City Code would be required for this. 3tion carried on a 5 -ayes, 0 -nays, 2- absent (Bedor and Walton) vote. UPDATE OF TOBACCO FREE PARKS✓ANOSA COUNTY Ms. Rachel H3ilyar, Tobacco Prevention Coordinator from Anoka County Community Health and Environmental Services, was present to give an update in regard to the status of the program. Nis. Hilyar will also be meeting with the associations after approval of the scheduling to see what the associations can do to promote the tobacco free parks. Ms. H ilyar said that bookmarks were made by community members for &triibuiion to announce the policy for tobacco free parks. Ms. Hiiyar has also been working with the Lacrosse Club with their tobacco free policy and is working to provide incentives, such as water coolers, to entice groups to consider a tobacco free policy. Mr. Haas told the Commission the signs for Tobacco Free Parks have been installed in the parks. Commissioner Dudgeon asked if there were any other communities participating in the program- Ms. Hiiiyar said the program was presented to the Parks Commission in Blaine, which made a recommendation to the City Council of Blaine, but the Council bas not yet heard the recommendation. No Action Needed_ S.2FI=ANDERSOMICflRLSON SKETCH PLAN Mr. Haas explained that this item is in regard to the proposed Smith/Anderson/Carlson sketch plan. The Park Commission is requested to determine if land will be required to be dedicated, combination. of land and cash to be dedicated or cash in lieu of land to be dedicated. Commissioner Dudgeon asked if the subdivision would be well connected by trails. Mr. Haas answered yes, the City built a trail to the East of Prairie Road and stops at Andover Boulevard. There is also a trail that connects from the private streets in Shadowbrook 5th Addition south up to Coon Creek. The plan is bring a trail all the way through the development, but this has not been discussed by the City Council. Commissioner Blackstad asked the price of building a bridge. geguiar Andover park & Recreation Commission Meeting Mimites — March 17, 2005 Page 4 i h Mr. Haas answered the costs is between $40,000 and $60,000 and will be included in the budget of the development Commissioner Albee asked about access for small children to a park closer to the homes. Commissioner Masloski asked if the center area would be developed immediately. Mr. Haas explained the area has been purchased. This sketch plan is the general idea of the development The developers are meeting with the Planning Commission within the next couple weeks. He went on to say Country Oaks West development has 100 new homes proposed and 3 lots were taken for a park in that development; therefore, a similar size park should be considered for these 186 new homes. Commissioner Maslowsld is in favor of park in this area, but would like to chose either the east or west side. Commissioner Albee expressed a preference for a park on the west side, because there are more homes on that side. .t► Commissioner Biackstad would like to see 2 or 3 lots in the center of the development taken for a patio. Commissioner Albee said more lots are neuled for this amount of homes. Commissioner Maslowsla asked if the center plot will surely be developed, as it would be detrimental to set aside plots in that area and have the plots on either side be the only places that are actually developed. Mr. Haas answered yes, and the particular developer for the center area is pushing to develop before the others. Chair Lind,-hl suggested placing the park on the west comer off the cul-de -sac in the center of the sketch taking the four lots from the c"e -sac to the road. Commissioner Dudgeon expressed concem about taking money now for parks that will not be developed for many years and the Commission existing in a budget deficit Discussion followed on cone= and possible solutions. Motion by Commissioner Blackstad, seconded by Commissioner Maslowski, to approve taking four lots in the center of the property and the balance in cash. Further Discussion Mr. Haas explained that this issue would return once the developers submit a preliminary plat of the property development . o� GO I i IVYE 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US To: Park and Recreation Commission CC: David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public Works /City Engineer DD S5 From: Todd J. Haas, Assistant Public Works Director Subject: 5. Update of Green Acres Park Improvements Date: February 21, 2013 INTRODUCTION The Park and Recreation Commission is requested to continue discussing possible improvements to Green Acres Park. DISCUSSION This was tabled from the meeting to allow staff to discuss the removal of the ball field after the 2013 baseball season at Green Acres Park with the Andover Baseball Association (ABA). To date staff has not heard back from the ABA but we hope to have an answer back from them in time for the meeting. As far as the existing playground equipment, the recommendation is to replace the equipment but not to relocate the structure from its current location. Staff recommends replacing the existing equipment with a playground structure that is designed for 2 -12 year olds. The Commission should also consider the request from one of the residents about constructing a small shelter which would include a picnic table. There is $32,000 available for playground equipment. The Commission will need to determine the amount to be allocated to equipment and determine if the remainder should be used to construct a small shelter or utilize the available funds for the relocation of the ball field at another park. Northwoods East Park was allocated $24,000 for equipment, concrete border edging for around the equipment and fall zone, wood fiber for fall zones and ADA access. Note: The Public Works Maintenance staff would like to reiterate that the ball field should be eliminated at this point for the following reasons: • Parking is one issue as there is not a designated parking lot. Vehicles are currently parking in the street. • The park is not large enough to accommodate the older individuals that have used the field in the past for fun ball. With the relocation of the ball field, baseballs and softballs would still end up on Ivywood Street and Heather Street and possibly even in the neighbor' s yards across the street. This park should be considered to be designated as a mini park (currently designated as a neighborhood park) because of the lack of parking. ACTION REQUESTED The Park and Recreation Commission is requested to continue discussing possible improvements to Green Acres Park. Respectfully submitted, Todd J. Haas Cc: Kylie Sand, Resident (copy sent by e -mail) Dennis & Becky Hager, Resident (copy sent by e -mail) Shawn Levens (copy sent by e -mail) Judy Reardon, (copy sent by e -mail) Jan Westlund, (copy sent by e -mail) Wendy Miller, (copy sent by e -mail) Attachment: Copies of 2 letters submitted at the last Commission meeting, Photo of park with proposed ball field location ✓ Feb7,2013 FEB - 7 813 To the Park Board: Due to my wife having surgery today I'm not able to attend the meeting but here are my (our) wishes - - -- Keep the park the same with just replacing the playground equipment - -since the park is small why o you have to spend money on moving the softball area - -put the money into the equipment keeping it where it is now located - -think about the safety issue for the children and in fact for all - - -if no one understands why we are so strong in this issue -take a drive on Ivywood and several times on Heather St. -- when coming from Heather you will notice how you need to pull out in a curve like fashion - -if you put more things in this peak it will be even harder. Also in checking around if the ball park is for smaller children why do we need a different fence -- the schools do not have fences in front of the benches and in other parks in other cities the playground is not close to the home plate in fact lots of the playgrounds are secluded away from playing fields - -- we have all had little ones grow up and were still able to see that our little ones were cared for and also able to enjoy seeing the games. (ref"-et" A-rnee 5 Pike t- FIB - 7 200 January 28, 2013 Parks Department City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, MN 55304 Re: Green Acres Park It is our understanding that there are plans to upgrade Green Acres Park in 2013. We are pleased to hear that the playground equipment will be upgraded, but we have also heard that suggestions have been made to setup the playground equipment by the intersection of 140`h Street and Heather. That is a very busy intersection and would not be a good location for children to play. The present location works fine. Also, the basketball court is used and should remain as part of the park. The ball fields are also used by Andover teams as well as neighborhood children. It is nice to have a large open area for children to play, fly kites, etc. We personally do not see anything wrong with the present setup. Thank you for considering our comments. Sincerely, Larry & Peggy Ihde 2949142 "d Avenue NW Andover, MN 55304 r a 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Park & Recreation Commission CC: David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public Works /City Engineer VDb FROM: Todd J. Haas, Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: 6. Discuss Crooked Lake School Hockey Rink DATE: February 21, 2013 INTRODUCTION The Park and Recreation Commission is requested to continue discussing the possibility of removing the Crooked Lake School Hockey Rink due to the challenges that have been raised by the Parks Maintenance Department. DISCUSSION This item was tabled from the last meeting to allow staff to discuss this with the Andover Huskies Youth Hockey Association ( AHYHA) President Mark Chevalier. Staff did have an opportunity since the last Park Commission meeting to discuss this with AHYHA and based on what was discussed AHYHA does not have an issue with eliminating the hockey and free skating rink at the school. It was mentioned to AHYHA that Hawkridge Park is available for practice for 2013 -2014 season and they do not have an issue with that. Just as a reminder, listed below the challenges that have been raised for Crooked Lake Elementary School are as follows: • The location of the rink is secluded and located very far back from the county road (Bunker Lake Boulevard). So it has been hard to know when it is open or not. • Although the rink is located on school district property, the rink is pushed right up against residential property which is private. • When the Parks Department Maintenance Crew plows the snow from the rink, much of the snow removal ends up onto private property since there is really nowhere to put the snow. • When the school district plows the adjacent parking lots, some the snow ends up on the ice. • Having issues with the trees growing into the rink areas. • Having issues with salt and debris from the parking lot ending up on the free skate rink due to the slope of the parking which drains towards the free skate rink. • The free skate rink is very small and narrow. • Towards the end of the skating season, the melting of the snow from the parking lot flows onto the free skating rink. • Melting snow from the hockey rink does flow onto Eidelweiss Street NW which can cause issues for that street. • It is difficult for hockey players to get to the hockey rink because of the downslope from the warming to the hockey rink. Once you get past the downslope, it is also very hazardous getting to the entry gate of the hockey rink. • Access to the hockey rink for maintenance is quite difficult from either around and through the playground or through the dead end street. • Parking our equipment at the site is very often difficult. The Parks Maintenance Crew always seems to be someone's way. • Getting out of the school parking lot is a challenge at certain times of the day. • Small kids are present when we do maintenance very often. They love the snow being blown over them. • Unfortunately once the rink has been cleaned, the school kids enjoy throwing snowballs onto the ice. Staff has discussed this with school representatives in the past but continues to be an ongoing problem for the Park Maintenance Crew. • Currently all wiring for the hockey rink lighting is above ground and does overhang pretty low to the rink and also is not very attractive. • The rink lighting is very out dated and should be replaced. • There is no security fencing to keep vehicles from driving around behind the school and the playground area. • The base of the rink could use some upgrades, clay or more hard pack gravel if it were to stay. • The basic layout and location of these rinks are just not very good for the City of Andover. If the rinks were located closer to an existing neighborhood, the rinks would probably get used more. Based on what staff has seen and heard, the rinks are not getting as much use as the other rinks such City Hall Outdoor Rinks. Note: The overall condition of the rink boards, posts and fencing are in decent shape as is the building. So if the rink is relocated to another City park, Parks Maintenance Department will do what they can to salvage the existing rink. The building is currently property of the school district since it was constructed by the Parent Teacher Organization. ACTION REQUIRED The Park and Recreation Commission is requested to continue discussing the possibility of removing the Crooked Lake School Hockey Rink due to the challenges that have been raised by the Parks Maintenance Department. Respectfully submitted, AV00A^___ Todd J. Haas Cc: Cheryl Kortuem, Principal at Crooked Lake Elementary School (copy sent by e -mail) Tom Redmann, Anoka Hennepin School District Sites /Grounds Supervisor (copy sent by e -mail) Mark Chevalier, AHYHA President (copy sent by e -mail) A C I T Y 0 F NDOVEolk-L 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Park & Recreation Commission CC: David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public Works /City Engineer b�� FROM: Todd J. Haas, Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: 7. Update on the Evos Equipment, Cont. DATE: February 21, 2013 INTRODUCTION This item is an update for the Park and Recreation Commission as to the status of the Evos equipment the Commission had expressed interest in the fall of 2012. DISCUSSION This was tabled from the last meeting as staff is waiting to see if the Andover Elementary School would be interested in relocating the Evos play structure from Champlin Elementary School to Andover Elementary School. As a reminder it is staff's recommendation that a structure of this type is more suited for installation at an elementary school. Staff is hoping to have an answer by the meeting but if not we will continue discussing this with Tom Redmann of the Anoka Hennepin School District to find a location at one of the elementary schools here in Andover (Crooked Lake, Andover or Rum River). Note: Just as a reminder the school district has indicated to staff that they are not interested in selling the structure to the City of Andover but certainly are interested in having the structure relocated to another elementary school if one of the elementary schools were interested. It may take City cost participation to relocate the play structure to an Andover school. Crooked Lake Elementary School Principal has indicated they are not interested in the Evos equipment since they just replaced their playground equipment a few years ago. ACTION REQUIRED This item is an update for Park and Recreation Commission as to the status of the Evos equipment the Commission had expressed interest in the fall of 2012. No action is necessary is required at this time. Respectfully submitted, Todd J. Maas Cc: Tom Redmann, Anoka Hennepin School District Sites /Grounds Supervisor (copy sent by e -mail) 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Park & Recreation Commission CC: David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public Works /City Engineer bDto FROM: Todd J. Haas, Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: 8. Update of Master Plan of Sports Complex/12- 31/3535 -161st Avenue NW, Cont. DATE: February 21, 2013 INTRODUCTION This is update in regards to the Master Plan of the Sports Complex, Project 12 -31. DISCUSSION The City Council will be reviewing the final draft of the Master Plan at their meeting of February 19, 2013. It is anticipated that residents will be at the City Council meeting to address the questions or concerns that were raised during the Open House that was held on February 7th. Ordering plans and specifications for Phase 1 is also scheduled for approval at the same meeting. It will take about 2 -3 months to prepare the plans and secure the necessary permits before the plan can go out for public bid. Construction is scheduled to begin in early July. Note: The Park and Recreation Commission will get an opportunity to review the plans as soon as they become available from WSB. ACTION REQUIRED No action is required at this time. Respectfully submitted, Todd J. aas Cc: Mike Johnson/Twila Hauck, Andover Football Association (copy sent by e -mail) Barb Anderson, North Metro Soccer Association (copy sent by e -mail) Glen Schneider /Twila Hauck, Andover Area Lacrosse Association (copy sent by e -mail) Jason Amberg, WSB (copy sent by e -mail) 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. • ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 • (763) 755 -5100 FAX (763) 755 -8923 • WWW.CI.ANDOVER.MN.US TO: Park & Recreation Commission CC: David D. Berkowitz, Director of Public Works /City Engineerzel� FROM: Todd J. Haas, Asst. Public Works Director "(9K SUBJECT: 9. Review Outstanding Items DATE: February 21, 2013 Issues list as of 2/19/13 COMPLETED PROJECTS — ON -GOING PROJECTS - • Update of Park Dedication Improvement Fund Quarterly Report — Next quarterly report is due in April • Update of Ouarterly Sheriffs Department Report on Park Patrol & Vandalism Next quarterly report is due in April. • Pleasant Oaks Park Parking Lot — The City Council has approved the removal of the parking lot. The work will be completed in the spring of 2013 by the Park Maintenance Crew. • Sorts Comolex Master Plan — Item is on the agenda. ON -HOLD PROJECTS — OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST — • Prairie Knoll Park Cell Tower — Nothing new to report. Still waiting for them to indicate when they are planning on starting on the construction. • Dog Park — A draft Joint Powers Agreement has been given to Coon Rapids and Anoka County Parks and Recreation Department for review. Comments are due back to the City of Andover by February 22nd • Andover Station North (naming of ball field) — Nothing new to report. The City Council has agreed to name the middle field at Andover Station North Ball Field Facility "Anders Field ". Staff will be working with the Andover Baseball Association on the sign to be installed on the backstop before the 2013 season starts. Note: Andover Baseball did install a sign that states Anders Field on the scoreboard (middle field). • 2013 Events in City Parks or Facilities —This has been scheduled on the March 7th agenda. The Commission members will need to determine what the activity responsibility will be for 2013. Keep in mind that the Commission members can team up on an activity if they like. • Melberg — 2013 ? • Skate Park Competitions and Camp/Van Vark — 2013 ? • Stenzel — 2013 ? • Organized Trail Bike Ride / Lindahl — Commissioner Lindahl will need to submit information by March 0' 2013 in time for the May -June newsletter. • Butler — 2013 ? • Lewnau — 2013 ? • Miskowiec — 2013 ? Update of Pedestrian Trails — At this point this is what has been going on with trails: • A trail will be constructed along the north side of Bunker Lake Blvd between 7th Avenue (CSAH 7) and Underclift Street NW as part of the reconstruction of Bunker Lake Blvd road reconstruction project. For those that are not familiar with this project, the section of the county road will be widened from a 2 -lane facility to a 4 -lane facility. The project will not start until the spring of 2013. The project is out for public right now. • The City Council has approved the 5 year (2013 -2017) Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for trails for the following locations: o A trail is identified in 2014 along the south side of Andover Blvd NW between Bluebird Street NW and Vale Street NW. • A trail along the east side of Nightingale Street NW north of Crosstown Boulevard NW is planned to be constructed with 2013 reconstruction project. If you have any questions or comments regarding any of the trail projects or grants that are being considered, feel free to contact Todd Haas or Dave Berkowitz at the City. Staff does recommend the Commission to continue reviewing the City Council meeting minutes that you receive by e -mail as to discussions of various projects the City Council has been working on or is considering. Note: If you have any items that you would like to add to the list, let me know at the meeting.