HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC April 2, 1991
DATE: April 2, 1991
, '\
~~
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Regular City Council Minutes - March 19, 1991
park and Recreation Minutes - March 21, 1991
Creekview Crossing Feasibility Report - April 2, 1991
Seasonal Road Restrictions on City streets
Lower Rum River watershed Minutes - February 20, 1991
Lower Rum River Watershed Minutes - February'27, 1991
Planning and zoning Minutes - March 12, 1991
New EPA rules force many cities to get stormwater permits
What's Happening
/
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT
AGENDA.
,
_J THANK YOU.
I
,---)
"
\
j
****************************************************************
~:********************************************************~~**,:
~~ ..
~~ ..
~~ ..
~~ ..
~~ ..
~~ _WH~AT'S_.o_HAPPENI.NG~?- ~~
~~ ..
.~ )..
~~ ..
.~ ..
.~ ..
~~ ..
~. April 2, 1991 ' ...
~~ ...
~~ ..
~. ...
:: UP COMING MEETINGS ::
~~ ....
~~ ...
~~ * Board of Review, 7:30 P,M" April 4, 1991 ...
.. ....
.~ ....
:: * Personnel Committee, ~:30 P,M., April 9, 1991 ::
~~ ..
:: * Joint Meeting with Cities In The Lower Rum ::
.~ River WMO, 7:30 P,M., Greenhaven country....
:: Club - Room A, April 11, 1991 ::
~~ ...
~~ ...
:~ * Joint Council - Planning & zoning Meeting, -',..
:: 7:30 P,M., April 30, 1991 ::'''-..
. ..
:: - Anoka county Landfill siting Committee has ::
:: delayed meeting until May 1,' 1991 ::
.. ..
.~ ..
~. ..
~~ ...
.~ ..
.~ ..
~ ~
.~ ..
~ ~
.~ ...
.~ ..
.~ ..
.. ..
.~ ..
.. ~
~ ~
.~ ..
.. ~
.. ...
.~ ..
.~ ~
.. ...
.~ ...
.. ~
.. ..
.~ ..
.~ ..
.~ /','; ...
.. fi ..
.. J ..
.. I ...
.~ ..
~. ..
.. ...
.~ ..
.. ...
.~ ..
.~ ...
~. ....
.. ...
.. ...
.~ ...
..*************************************************************.
................................................................
~
~.
r
(~
"
~,'
I
"
7
.
r
,.
r
;
I
,
,
,
i
..
--
1"-''''''' . ............. 1l.~"'_'( . .............-. i ..J, .... ~ ,
I ~ ~C
NewEPA rules force many"cities to ~
, get stormwater permits/
J JJbJn:a:rA.~
, ..l., .,' .
: U)'9CJ ~ oaIy bIgu cities will need
h NW ~Wller perml~ required by
the IlnYiroamental Protection Agency,
chedt'tJae regu1ationugain. . .
NMdy buried In thete new EPA regu-
I&tIoN are unexpected requirements thAt
&l*\Y ,IlD&11er dtiel &nd toWN obtain
Itonnwater diIdwge permits for IOme of
tbdr InduItrl&1 activities. These lndUBtrlal
&etivi~ ~ from 1andfiI1a to vehicle
~ f&cilltlea. The requirements
are COIJI~ &nd COItly, with a rapidly
approaching de&dline for compliance.
To hold down the COlIts of compliance
with these reguhtions, The North CAr0-
linA Le&gue of Municipalities now Is
working on a group application process
ftx local governments in North Carolina.
The proiect is a joint effort of the NCLM
and the North Carolina Assod&tion of
County Coauniaaloner5o
The BFA reguhtions, issued in lAte
1990, ~ out the Water Quality Act of
1987. 1bese are final rules for the Na-
tional Pollutant Discharge Elimination
Syatem (NPDES) Permits for storm water
discharges.
"We knew the final version of the
regulations was coming, but we had been
told that only about five of the largest Tar
Heel cities would need permits for their
IItonn Ie'Wa' systems," said David E.
Eeynolds, NClM executive director.
~t'twprised us Is how the EPA
defines lnduatrW activities to Include
many awnIdpaI functions. The defini-
tion ollndustria1 activities means that
towns with . vehicle maintenance facility
mutt get a permit. Another permit Is
required for wastewater IIeatment plants
rated over one m1l1Ion gallons per dayo
We had no Idea that 10 many municipal
operations would require permltso"
Cities and towns likely will be required
, to get a permit to discharge storm water
for each of the indusbial activities listed
below:
. publicly owned wastewater treat-
ment faciliti~ of more than one milllon
gallons per day, apd thO6/! with plants
rated at less than 1 MGD if the state or
. federal government requires a pretreat-
"ment plan;
, __) .' landfills and dumps (whether still in
use or ~osed);
. steam power generating facilities;
. transportation facilities (including
vehicle maintenance shops, equipment
cleaning operations, airports and airport
de-Icing operations); ,
. construction activities that result in
the disturbance of five acres total land
area.
The EPA Is requiring separate permits
for each type of indusbial activity; for
example, a permit for a wastewater treat-
ment plant and a permit for a landfill.
There are several ways to obtain a
permit. One Is for each local government
u~t to obtain permits for each type of
activity. Another Is for units to. make a
group application; for example, 20 cities
and counties with vehicle maintenance
facilities submit one group application
for all such facilitieso
U a municipality chooses to obtain Its
own permitS, the lint part of the applica-
tion Is due November 18,1991. The cost,_
however, for such an individual permit
could run as high l\S $25,000 for a landfill
activity.
The permit pl'OCe5i requires cosl1y en-
gineering. chemical testing and monitor-
Ing and nporting of stonnwater runoff
from each lOurce 0
"Group applications may be more
cost-effective for cities and towns, be-
cause the EPA will require only fo per-
cent of the activities 'to be tested, with 10
sites as the minimum," "said Reynolds.
"The problem Is that the first part of the
group applications mUBt be In by March
18,1991."
With a group application, alIloca1 gov-
ernments participating would pay a
share of the costs associated with obtain-
Ing the permit. The EPA estimates that a
city or county would save money by
being part of a group applicationo
The NCLM and the North Carolina
Assocation of County Commissioners are
coordinating group applications for
municipalities and counties. The two
organizations sent out mailings outllnlng
the new requirements and asking which
units might be interested in a group
application. .
Between now and March 18, the
league and the association will determine
if group applications are feasible, hire
engineering assistance to handle both
phases of the application process; deter-
mine the costs; and sign up local govern-
ments to participate.
The. group application process offers,
for many units, an Insurance policy
against the high cost of individual appli- .
cations and buys time for the completion
of testing and monitoringo
The state of North Carolina will issue
the pel"l]\lls, under delegation from EPA
and with little Information, assistance or
warning. The department expects as
many as 6,000 permit applications and
has only limited staff and ~urces to
handle this permit process.
EPA will rule on the group application
in May, and units have one year to com-
plete Part 2 of the application, Including
testing. monitoring and inspection oT the
sample sites. .
Yet Another Unfunded Mandate
While working to reduce the costs of
the permit process, NCLMofficials allO
realize that the permits are an unex-
pected, unfunded mandate from the fed-
eral government. NCLM President
Jimmy C. Draughn, mayor of Valdese
wrote to each member of the North Caro-
lina congressional delegation to register
concern over the regulations and the
short time for compliance.
Draughn's letter mentioned the fol-
lowing concerns about the new
stormwaler permit regu1ations:
. "inlormatlon has only now reached
us and our member ~vemments about
complying with the regu1ations;
. the short lime response for filing an
application to be part of . group applica-
tion for clischal'Re permits (March 18);
. the pervasl~eaa of the regu1ations
covering everything from ama11 waste--
water treatment plants to ama11 munici-
pal garage vehicle maintenance facilities;
. the enormous cost for inspection,
monitoring and testing for each aile' (lor
an individual application estimated from
$25,000-$30,000 per site for each poten-
tial site);
. the application of these regu1atlons
to small units without regard to ability to
pay; .
. continued insensitivity of the federal
government to local units In passing
along (1ta1ica) unfunded mandates;
. a general questioning of the cost ef-
fectlvli!ness of implementing all of these
stormwater regulations."
Draughn asked the state's congress-
men to help relieve the stormwater per-
mit requirement on cities 8.\\(1 towris. Said
Draughn: "Someone has to take the lead-
ership to stop the federal and state gov-
ernments from passing along mandates
for which local governments have to pay
the lab. Many of our units are on the
verge of regulation revolt because of the
incessant stream of requirements and
costs from Washingtono This is a direct
reflection of the attitude of their residents
who resent the intnlsion and increased
costs for a limited purpose."
Noted David E. Reynolds, NCLM ex-
ecutive director: "EPA's track record with
local governments has seen the agency
proceed at a snail's pace for writing regu-
lations, missing their own deadlines,
only to spring final regulations on cities
and towns with no warning and impossi-
ble deadlines." 0
Terry A. Htndtrson is dirtclor 01 inttT-
gotltT1lmtntlll programs lor Iht North Caro-
lina Ltagut 01 Municiplllilitso
"':-,::;....,-,."
..(C}\
,--./
"-~7';'~' -
7:30 p.m.
'i
"
CITY of ANDOVER
Regular city Council Meeting-April 2, 1991
Call to Order
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Discussion Items
1. public Hearing/Ordinance 8, Curbing Requirements
2. Amend Ordinance 8, Sections 4.05 and 6.02
3. Paint Ball War Games Discussion
staff, Committee, Commissions
4. Equestrian Council Appointments
5. Approve Strnet Sweeping Quotes
6. Approve Refinishing Exterior of Public Works
Building
7. Road Committee Report
8. Appoint Representative/Site Selection Committee
9. Approve Budget Reduction Plan
Non-Discussion Items
10. Receive Feasibility Report/91-2/Creekview
Crossing
11. Approve Installation of Signs/Barnes Rolling
Oaks
12. 90-3/90-16,Assessments/Declare Costs, Waive
P.H., Adopt Assessment Roll
Mayor/Council Input
Approval of Claims
Adjournment I
I
I
\
. )
'------,
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
....
p"" . ~
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ~~r;fA
NO, Approval of Minutes
ITEM Admin. '. \
NO. Approval of Minutes ~,., ~'
BY: H Un 11.- \J' B'V
/
The Ci ty Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
March 19, 1991 Regular Meeting
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY SECOND BY
TO
DATE ~ ., ') , ~ In,
'-.J
:~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
April 2, 1991
ITEM
NO.
I.
Ordinance No.8, Sec.
8.08(E)(9) - Curbing
BY:
David L. Carlberg
City planner
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion Items
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to review and amend, if
necessary, the curbing requirements as defined in Ordinance No.8,
Section 8.08 (E)(9).
BACKGROUND
On February 5, 1991, the City Council considered a request by the
Metropolitan Mosquito Control District to be granted relief from
the curbing requirements as defined in Ordinance No.8, Section
8.08 (E)(9) which states that "All driveways, loading areas and
storage areas shall be bounded by poured in place concrete curb
and gutter...". The Metropolitan Mosquito Control District
presented to the Council a map of those areas where the relief is
being requested and their reasoning for the request (see attached
minutes dated February 5, 1991). The Council, at that meeting,
made the motion to refer the request to the Planning and zoning
Commission to review the curbing requirements and to determine if
any changes were necessary.
The Planning and zoning Commission, at their February 26, 1991
meeting, reviewed the curbing requirements of Ordinance No. 8 and
determined that no amendments to the Ordinance were necessary (see
attached minutes dated February 26, 1991).
On March 19, 1991 the City Council determined that an amendment to
Ordinance No.8, Section 8.08 (E)(9) be made similar to
Blaine's curbing Ordinance (attached) and that a public hearing
should be scheduled for the April 2, 1991 meeting. Council had
also requested that a copy of the public hearing notice be
distributed to each member of the Planning and zoning Commission.
Attached are the appropriate documentation explaining the history
of the item.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'"..-/
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 · (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The City Council of the City of Andover will hold a public hearing
at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be heard, on Tuesday,
April 2, 1991 at the Andover City Hall, 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW,
Andover, MN to consider an amendment to Ordinance No.8, the
zoning ordinance of the City of Andover.
Said amendment to Section 8.08 (E)(9), Curbing Requirements, would
distinguish between high use institutional developments and
low use institutional developments. High use institutional
developments shall be required to be bounded by poured in place
concrete curb and gutter. Low use institutional shall contain
poured in place concrete curb and gutter on the portions of such
areas which front on a public right-of-way extending back to the
building wall. Concrete curb and gutter or curb only may be
required on the perimeter of any other driving or parking areas
where necessary for drainage or traffic control.
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
22, 1991
29, 1991
. )
<;1
. "
,~
,J
f~ It::.O.
'3
V, <iJt J
All driving areas and parking areas which are accessory to multiple
family (over 4 units), commercial, business, industrial, or high
use institutional developments shall be bounded by poured in place
concrete curb and gutter. High use institutional development shall
include hospitals, schools, publ ic buildings intended for high
traffic use, and similar uses.
All driving areas and parking areas which are accessory to low use
institutional developments or low use public occupancies shall
contain poured in place concrete curb and gutter on the portions of
such areas which front .on a public right of way extending back to
the building wall. Concrete curb and gutter or curb only may be
required on the perimeter of any other driving or parking areas
where necessary for drainage or traffic control. Low use
institutional developments shall include churches, parks, private
clubs, low traffic public occupancies, and similar uses.
The City may exempt curbing:
Where the parking lot directly
sufficiently higher than the grade
for the curbing requirements; or
abuts a sidewalk which is
of the parking lot to substitute
Where the City has approved future expansion of the parking lot.
All construction shall be in conformance' with curbing
specifications on file in the office of the City .Engineer.
II
,.r
J
\
,_ _J
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Dave Carlberg, city planner
Planning and zoning Commission
Todd J. Haas, Assis~ant City Engineer 1~
February 26, 1991
REFERENCE: Ordinance 8 Section 8.08 (E) 9
A request has been made by the Planning and zoning Department as
to why concrete curb and gutter should be required for all
driveways, loading areas, parking areas and storage areas. Some
of the reasons for this requirement are as follows:
Traffic Control - night and daytime hours
Drainage control
Aesthetic Reasons
protect Landscape Features
Protect Pedestrian Movement
Reduced maintenance to pavement edges (helps eliminate erosion
that occurs from rainfall or snow melting and to reduce
vehicles to drive on pavement edges, which may not have the
strength to support vehicles without the concrete curbing.
Also attached is the city of Blaine curbing requirements which
may determine how Andover could amend its ordinance.
If the Planning and Zoning Commission would like a representative
from the Engineering Department to attend a future meeting,
please,let me know,
TJH:rjr
./
\
'. )
'\
j
'-
(3) Permanent impervious' sediment control structures consist of sediment
basins (debris basins, desi1ting basins, or silt traps) and shall be
utilized to remove sediment from runoff prior to its disposal in any
permanent body of water or stream.
33.18 HEIGHT LIMITATIONS
.....
Height Limitations, as sec forch in this ordinance, shall not apply to church
spires, cupolas, water towers, observacion towers, flag poles, and chimneys.
Any other scructure above fifcy (50) feet from ground level shall require a
condicional use permit.
33.19 BUILDING RELOCATION
To maintain a high standard of residential development in the City of Blaine and
to protecc residential areas from deleterious affects through insuring that both
new and relocated buildings from wichin the city limits or from other areas
outside of the city, building relocation shall meet specified requirements.
(a) Each relocation of a residence or residential accessory building shall
require a conditional use permic from the City Council and all such build-
ings shall conform with and be siCuated in a properly zoned area in accor-
dance with all of the provisions of. this ordinance and the City building
code. Commercial and industrial buildings shall not be moved.
(b) Application for a permit to move a building shall be accompanied by an
abscraccor's cercificate of propercy ownership within 350 feet of the bound-
ary lines of the loc upon which che building is co be 10caced. The applica-
cion must also be accompanied by a written consent and approval of at leasc
50% of che property owners within che said 350 feet of said lot.
(c) The applicacion may be granted or rejecced by the City Council after a
public hearing before che Planning Commission.
33.20 CURBING (Entire Seccion Amended 8-15-85. Ord. 85-898)
(a) All driving areas and parking areas which are accessory' to multiple family,
cOlllll1ercial. planned commercial, planned industrial business park, or high
use institutional developments. shall be bounded by a B612 concrete curb
and gutter. "High use inscitutional development" shall include hospitals,
schools. public buildings. and similar uses. (Amended 4-1-87. Ord. 87-1016)
(b) All driving areas and parking areas which are accessory co industrial or
low use institutional developmencs shall contain a B6-12 concrece curb and
gutter on the portions of such areas which front on a' public righc-of-way
extending back to the building wall. Concrete curb and gutter or curb only
may be required on the perimeter of any other driving or parking areas
where necessary for drainage. or traffic control. "Low use institutional
,/
developmencs" shall include"i::hurches. parks. private clubs. and similar
J
uses. .
(c) The City may exempt curbing:
(1) Where the parking lot directly abuts a sidewalk which is sufficiently'
higher chanoche grade of the parking 10c to substitute for the curbing
\ requirements; or
/
33-27
(2) Where the City has approved future expansion of the parking lot.
(d) Curbing shall be required around islands in pavement.
(e) Curb cutS and ramps for the handicapped shall be installed as required by
, State Law.
,_j (f) Construction shall be in accordance with curbing specifications on file in
the office of the City Engineer.
33.21
BUFFERYARD FL~XIBILITY (Entire Section Amended 4-3-86. Ord 86-937)
If a reduction to the setback buffer is requested. the Director of Communi-
ty Development may consider a reduction in 5 foot increments down to 45
feet. provided the applicant agrees to provide additional plant materials
in the setback area using the following standards for each 5 foot increment.
Required plant units/100 lineal feet
.3 overs tory deciduous trees (min. size 2 1/2 inch caliper b&b)
.6 ornamental trees (min. size 1 1/2 inch caliper b&b)
2.0 shrubs (min. size 24 inch pot)
1.1 evergreens/conifers (min. size 6 foot b&b)
For reductions from 45 feet down to 25 feet. the following will apply:
Required plant units/l00 lineal feet
.3 overs tory deciduous trees (min. size 2 1/2 inch caliper b&b)
.6 ornamental trees (min. size 1 1/2 inch caliper b&b)
1.0 shrubs (min. size 24 inch pot)
.5 evergreens/conifers (min. size 6 foot b&b)
-
Also. if the applicant wants a reduction from 45 feet to 25 feet. there
shall be an 8 foot high board-on-board fence required along the lot line.
all mechanical equipment shall be roof mounted (screened from view). no
wall fans. no flood lighting or directional security lighting will be al-
lowed to create glare or spillover ontO adjacent properties,
SECT/33/TBPLAN
8-2-89
1
j
11-'11
Planning and Zoning Co~~ission
Minutes - Feb~ua~y 26. 1991
Page 10
:J
<Special Joint Meeting with City Council/Set Agenda. Continued)
2. 1/10, 4/40 Ru~al Development p~oposal
3. City Cente~ Concept p~oposal in Comp~ehensive Plan
4. Di~ection f~om Council when Sending Items to the P & Z
5. P & Z Level of Comme~cial Site Plan Review
The Commission also b~iefly discussed the p~oblem of p~ocedu~e
when the~e is a lack of attendance and pa~ticipation by a
Commissione~. It was ag~eed to table this item until the Commission
itself had a chance to discusS it mo~e tho~oughIY.
.~
DISCUSSION _ ORDINANCE NO.8. SECTION 8.08 (E) (9). CURBING
REQUIREMENTS
The Commission discussed the ~equest of the City Council to ~eview the
cu~bing ~equi~ements of conc~ete cu~b and gutte~ in va~ious
aplications. Ms. Basel I explained that conc~ete cu~b and gutte~ was
added as a ~equi~ement to p~event e~osion, to dl~ect the wate~. and to
p~otect the quality of the pa~king se~vice. The City Council is
appa~ent\y saying the~e may be mo~e than one standa~d, in that if it
is quasi-public o~ a pa~k o~ in a natu~al application, then maybe the
conc~ete cu~bing may not be needed. The p~oblem came in with the
Mosquito Cont~ol Dist~ict asking to be exempted f~om cu~bing a~ound
thei~ sto~age a~ea. a~guing it is an expense that is not necessa~Y.
Some Commissione~s questioned a dual standa~d of t~eating develope~s
,diffe~ent\y f~om othe~s, felt that the use of a pa~king lot is not a
function of the occupancy, and thought that a pa~king lot in a pa~k
can get just as much use as a comme~cial pa~king lot. M~. Ca~lbe~g
though t the o~dl nance shou I d ~ema i n as is. ag~ee i ng with the way it is
wc-itten. The Commission gene~allY agr-eed.
MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Dehn" that if the City
g~ant an economic courtsey to anothe~ gove~nmental
use the variance p~ocess, not amend the o~dinance.
as-Yes, 2-Absent <Jonak, McMullen) vote.
Council wants to
agency, they shouid
Motion car~ied on
DISCUSSION - PAINT BALVWAR'GAMES OPERATIONS
M~. Carlbe~g explained tha~ the City Council has asked the Planning
and Zoning Commission to examine the ope~ating of Paint Ball/Wa~ Games
within the City of Andove~ -- whether o~ not they should be allowed:
and if allowed, how should they be ~egulated and where should they be
allowed. He noted the City has received two ~equests for these
operations, plus one has been operating within the City with no City
~egulation in the vicinity of Wa~d Lake D~ive.
1/
\J
Regulae City Council Meeting
Minutes - FebcuaCy 5, 1991
Page Z
\
'J
~onctnued Publ ic ~eaeing/!?90-Z5 - Mesquito Conc"ol Dist~ict)
pe ent location at the Anoka County Highway Building to the westecly
line t the pcopecty the Mosquito Distcict is leasing. The City would
pay fa. ~he ovecsizing at a ccst of about 53,aaa. The fcontage of the
leased P pecty would be assessed along with the acea and connection
chacges. ~ e Anoka County Packs Building would not be assessed at
this time. en the watermain is extended in the futuce, the county
would be asses d foc the additional feontage plus an acea assessment
to the PackS Buil ing. The County Beaed has passed a resolucton
indicating they wou. like to be notitiedot any potential er pecposed
impcovement toe the a a in the fucure peior to holding the public
heacings.
the quescion of whac happens it the
squlto Conteol Disc"ic:'s pr:oposal.
,- &.....,.. ~.....c:::'C' lit
Ma~TaN by Jacobson, Seconded by MoKelvey, the esolution as proposed
with the tol lewing change: that this is not va 'd until an agceement
is ceached with the county on the costs that the unty wil I be
incucring on the project and they have given approv <See
Resolution R01Z-91 erdering the improvement of watecma' , pcoject No.
90-25. 1260 Bunker Lake Boulevacd, Metropolitan Mosquito ontroi
Distcict, and dicecting pceparation of tinal plans and spe Ofications)
The Council then discussed the issue of curbing the site being leased
by Mosquito Control District. Mr. Gauger pcesented a map of the
proposed impt"ovemen t pt"oj ect and the it" proposal, fot" curbi ng around the
building. They ar'e asking to be reI ieved of the ordinance which
requires cucbing ar'ound the pt"opecty because they wan~ to to maintain
the pack statuS. It is not in a zoned distr'ict oc a commercialsitei
bu it is in a pack, feeling that is the basis on which the cucbing can
be exempted.
Me. Carlbet"g t"eviewed Ct"dinance S, Section 8.08 <E) (9) which t"equires
all dciveways, loading areas/and storage ar'eas to be bounded by
concC"ete curb and guttec. The exceptions ace vecy cleac, mainlY In
residential aceas; and he relt that per the ordinance, this is not an
excep t i on. /
It was pointed out during the discussion that the ocdlnance was
cecentlY amended to requice concrete cur~ and guttecs. Mayor Crttel
ageeed the exceptions ace vecy ciear, but he caised the question of
intent. thinking the ocdinance as written seems sevece fer this type
of use.
,_J
. ~---
Regulae- City Council Mee'ting
Minutes - FecC"uaC"y 5. 1991
Page 3
\,
'J
<Continued PublIc Heaeing/!?90-Z5 - Mosquito Conteol DistC"ict)
Me-. Gaugee pointed out one of the difficulties ~ith cu,"oing is the
~atee then is contained, and they have no ~ay of dispee-sing it. The
cuC"cing eequieed is extensive. and they feel it is an unnecessae-y
expendituC"e of publiC monies.
Council discussion noted that to al lo~ any deviation fe-om the
oedinance ~ould C"equie-e an amendment to it. !n vle~ing the sketch
plan, theC"e ~as geneC"al agC"eement that i: the oe-dinance did not
C"equlC"e cuC"oing in the paC"kS. it ~ould be acce~table to have ccnc~ete
cUC"O and ~~tteC" along the east and ~est sides of the dC"ive~ays ana
fe-cnt paC"king aC"ea. as well as aC"ound the building as pC"c~osed. The
dC"ainage ~ould then be diC"ec~ed a~ay :C"cm the cue-Oed aC"eas. and the
,"emaining pe-emeteC" ~ould not have concC"ete cue-O and gutteC". ~hicn
~ould be in keeping ~ith the aestnetics of the paC"k ae-ea.
Because some indicated the o,"dlnance as ~eitten is moC"e encompassing
than ~as oC"iginallY intended and ~as not meant fo," aeeas within a
pack, facms. and othee laege open aceas. it ~as agC"eed to dle-ect the
Planning Commission to look at that section of the oC"dinance. !t was
thought the oeiginal intent ~as to C"equiee conce-ete cuebing aC"ound
commeC"cial areas such as convenience stoe-es. shopping oentees. etc.
MO~TON by Jacobson that the Counci 1 deny the e-equest foe vaeiance
fC"om Oedinance 8. Section 8.08 to cue-bing foe the pe-oject. Motion
dies foe lack of a Second.
MaTTON by Smith. Seconded by McKelvey. that we tabie this until we
take a closee look at the oC"dinance and make some adjustment to that
feom the eecommendations of our Staff, and foe-~aC"d it to the Planning
Commission. Motion careied unanimouslY.
The hearing ~asclosed at 8:10 p.m.
wcoot~ND C~EEK Got~ COURSE PtAN
Bvron Westlund. Woodland Oevelooment - e-evie~ed the peoposal to
ailow the DNR to teap the gosiings that hatch in the speing of 1991
and teansfer them to othee eegions ~ithin the State of Minnesota in an
effort to alleviate the peob.l.em caused by the geese on the golf
c~r~. 0
MaTTON by Peery, Seconded by Smith, that the City of Andovee
authoeize MayoC" Orttel to send a lettee- to the DNR stating the City's
agreement ~ith the live teapping of goslings on the Woodland Ceeek
Golf Couese. subject to the DNR appeoval and complying ~ith theiC"
eules. Motion caeeied unanimouslY.
'-)
.--.--.- ..
s.oa PARKING T. CODtrol of oir-street parklnC
(A) Surfac:iDC and D_ce faci1ltl_wn... reqwre<1 accessory
off-street parlCDe faci1ltl.. are pro-
Off'''''5Ueet parldDC areas stlall be v1Cled. elHWl1ere th.aA 011 th.. lot
improved with :1 durable and. dust- iJ1 wtlic:h the prinCl'PU use served.
less surface. Such. areas si1&U be is located. theY' sba11 be ill the same
so ~ded and drainec1 as to dispose owneniUp or contrOl. either by Drive-II1 J'ood. z.t:ahU.hft'llCUt:
ot all surtaCl! water accumuLaUOD. deed or lODe-term. lease. aa the
WIth the area. These rerqwremeDtS propertY occupied by such priD-
shall a1so applY to opeD. sales lots. ci'PaJ. use. ancl the owner ot the
Durable anc1 dusclesll surDce sI1all pnncipa! use sI1all lIle a recordable
be asphalt. conr.rete. or other sur- document Wlt.l1 the TawnsbiP. re-
face (water sealed) as approved. by quiriDC the owner iU1d. his or b.er
tile En_eel' or BWldlD& J.nspec:Cor. heirs ana ....ena to mamcain the
requin<l Dwnber of o<<-street SIlaca
(B) Loc:aClOll durmc tile ___ of sai4 pnn-
cpa! use.
All accessory olf-otreet park1De
faci1ltl.. reqwred. !>ere1D shall be II. Use of parldD& area-required
loca'teCl as follows: off.S'tr'eU paridD.C space in any
DlsCncC shall not be utW%ed. fOr
1. Spaces accessorT to one and OpeD. stOnce at COOdS or tar the
ewo-famllY dwewncs all the same stance ot vehicles wt1i.cb. are iD-
Iot .. tl1e pnn<iPA1 UR served.. operable or tor sale or fOr nme.
Z. Spaca accessorT to multiple (DI Desten and MalnteD&D"e of
famil,. dwelllDCS oa the same lot alf-......t Parldne At_
u the priJ1C1pal use served. or with..
111 200 teet of the maID ...trance to L ParldD& areu-sball be, deslCJl-
the pnncipal builc1iDC served.. ed. so as to prevta adequatlt meaDS
of aceeu to a pubUc st:r'eU or
3. Spaces accessor7' to uses 1.0- alley. Suc:l1 c1rivewa.,. access shall
cated. "" a Buscness or Industnal Dot exceed. thirtY (30) teet in width
Dlsmct. witbiA 400 feet ot a malA and. sh.all be so located.,.as to cause:
encn.nce to the priDcpa1 buildinC the least iAtertereDCe/with traJftc
sarv.:1. movement.
'" There shaI1 be DO otl-street Z. tJchtln_,. UChtlne used. to
park1De space withia live \51 feeC llllUD1Date all olf-street parklnC
at allY streec nCht4-way. area shall be arranced. .. to.... At 1- 3 park1De spac.. for
fte.C1:. the UCht awa]" from the act- each 1.000 sq. tt. ot grou door
5. ~o off-street opea park1DC area *=jOUW1C propertY.. ~ area.. 0""" saI.. lot sItal.I proY1de
CODta1D1DC more thaIl tour (4) tour 7"\ 3 parlciaC spac.. tor eaell 5.Qoo
parlaDc spac" slla1I be loated. 3. CUl'bIaC ana laadsc:>.plac-aU sq. ft. at lot area. but Dot leSlI
closer <ball live (51 feet from all opea olf-streeC parkine area de- tIWl 3 spaces.
ad1acent lo'C zoned. or u.sec:1!or SlCUed. to have b.eact-LD park1nC
"a...~ purposes. aloDC the propertY lIIte or a guar<1 Industrial. warenouse. starace.
f at nanna! bum~er height not l!!U haDc1JJ.a.C of tn.lUc loods.
'~ ...) General Prcivtslou than dve (5) feet from the sute
_ : ]:)rO:pertY Une or a guard. ot nonnal At least 1 space tor each. % em-
1. Floor area-The term 'Ticer bumper helght not less than dve ployees on maximwn shift or 1
Area'. shall meaD the swn ot all (5) feet from the SIde propertY tor each 800 sq. ft. ot cross door
floor area in a bulletinIC as c:a1c:u- line. When said area is tor SIX area. wbid1ever 1.1 the larcer.
lated !rOm the OUtslde d1menslOns (6) SlJaces or more. a curb or fence
ot the bulldlDC. It sj];&\\. DOC in- noC over six 5) teet in l1eil1hl sItal.I Us.. lIOt SIlocill.c:aIly aoCed.
(sl All s1CDS Dot 111 conformity
with the provistons at: tt11S ~rc11-
nance shall be removed WIthin a
penoc1 of two (31 yun folloWllle
eldctment.
(tl Marquees of any t7P8. with
or witb.Ou~ siena, &baJ1 require a
~ -.aJ. use penrut.
, ) If a c:ommercIaI or lac1ustria1
b.....J.i11C ~ acljac.... to a freeWa,..
or expreaw.,. ~ _the permitted. me
at siena sIYll .. _ed. fOr eael>.
aadlu=a! 25 teet at troDt ~
setDac& for the bu.iJ.d.tD.C and. SlCDS
tram that roqulre<1 provtdec1 that
suc:l1 J.Dc:re;&Il8 sD&U no~ rau.lt La.
a SlCD area more tI:1aZl 20". of the
area of the troDt face of the buIId-
I11C oa wll1CA the lIP Ia locatec1.
(vI Siena for __ftDiIle
uses sbaU be &ovU118Ci UDder 'Ule
"LB- Dlatr1ct proYIoioaa.
(wI Red.. ,.ellow. or _ Uchts
that b,. positlOD or c:oiOr in an,.
other manner tend to cause con-
tUSIon in the proper reacU11C at
tra:nc siCDS or StcaaJs sI1all be re-
moved.
(x) Prtvate tramc drcuLatloa
siena 111 parlciDC loa and ped.estr1a1l
CU'CtJ,UUOIl SlII13. and. tra!flc warn-
me SleDS in alleys or other haZ-
arclous SltuatioDS may 1?e penmt-
tea. provicled. sud1 indiVlclua.L $lIDS
do not exceed. three (31 square
feet. tbe mu:u.mUDl Dumber neces-
sary tor purposes I11te1lded. Is uUl-
izec1. and suell s1CDS are utW%ed.
exclusivelY tor purp0M8 inteDd.ed.
anc1 pernutted..
(YI Siena aD beaches. Dewsnand:l.
cabstaJ:14 sicus. bus nap snelters.
c:hurcl1 diredJonal silDS- and. sun-
iIar places. slW1 reqwre a. special
use penD1t in accord.aJ1C8 WIth pro-
c:ec1ures CODtai11ed. !..ll the %OIW18i
o_eo
(:1 DecoratioltS. b.....ers. ana
other tem-Porary S1CDS may be per-
auttec::l Wl'th1n the pubUc rigbt~t-
way provided. a spec:ia1 use per-
:rut 15 cranted. for a speci.fled. time
Dot to .."coed litteea (UI daYS.
.....---. . .
,-
.'
,
elude are.. use<! prlmaril,. .. build_
Lne utility raoma. office ot bulld-
1nC muycert\ent or maintenaDc:e.
tol.lets or rest rooms. d.reSIiDa. flt-
tinc or altent10D room5. cooLers.
winc10w displays or lobbies.
%. Beach.. 111 p_ of public
aaembl7-iA stadlWN, sports are-
naa. chu:ches. anc1 other placa of
public: auemb17 111 whleil patra!UI
or speetatoJ'S oceuP7 bdctLea. pews.
or other st.miI.ar ...t1DC tadlltlea.
each ........,.-cwo (Z21 I11ch" of
sucIl _1:I11C tacllltIea sI1all be
cou.nted U aD. (1) aut for the
purpoM of detennl11iDC ~~
menta tor otf..stred PVidD.C
tI.. Wldar tl1Ia 0-..
.3;.~Park1DC spacoa -~ parIcI11e
space shall be noC IeSlI thaIl tell
(lO) teet wide &Dd ~ I .....-.,. teet
1D leDCUl exc1US1ve of an actequate-
lJ' d_ed. system of __ drtvea.
'" Use of parklne fadl1t1_lf-
street parldnC tac:illttes accessory
to res1den~ l1Ie shall be ut1ll%ed.
solelY tor the par!aDe of paasea-
&U automobl.les met/or one trUc:Jc
DOC to exceed. tea thOusana (10,0001
pounQa crosa capacity tor eacb
dwelll11C. UDdu no CU'CIlmStaDca
shall reqwre<1 parklDC faci1lCles
acc:essory to res1dent1.aJ. structures
be usec1 for the stance at com-
merc1al vehicles in excess ot: 1%.000
pounds cross c:.apaot'Y or tor the
parkinC at automoblles be1on&U1C
to employees. oWDers. tenants or
custOmers at nearby bUSU1es8 or
maAutacturU1C estabUs1u:llel1ts.
5. Spaces I.ccessorT to one and
two-tamlly dweWnP 011 the same
lot u the princ:1PaJ. use served.
5. J'oLnt parl<l11C faci1ltles-off-
street parkine tac1litles tor a com-
bination ot mixed. bwld.il1P, strUc-
tures or uses may be proVIded. ml-
lect1velY in any "Dtstnc:t'. (except
Res1d...~ DtscricCsI in wll1CA sep-
arat. parkinC !aci11t:tes for ead1
separate bW.ldJDC. strUctUre or use
would be reqwrec1. \l<Ovtded. thaC
the tota.1 numaer at spaces prO-
videct shall equal the sum at: the
separate requirements of each use
dunng any peak hour parlc1.nC per..
ioc1.
-(
I
be erected. aloDe the troDt seC-
bac:Jc Il11e aad crasa or plal1ti11C sI\a.L1
OCCUpy the SJlace betWeen the stele-
wa!Jt anc1 curt> or tence.
'" ParIdnc space tor six (51 ...
more cars-wtl.&Il a reQu1red oft'-
screet parldaC space tor SIX (51
e.an or mare 18 located. ac11aClU1'C
to a ~....d&L D1Rric:t. a fmc8
of adequate a_ ,DOt over SIX
(51 teet ID. l1alcnt nor 1_ thaa a"e
(51 teet 111 nes&l1t sIIaI1 be -
aloac the _eatla1 DIatr1c:t pro-
pertJ' II11&.
S. ......".-."... of olf-street park-
iDC ....-<t shall be the jotnC
responall>W.tJ' of tl1e opcator aDd
ownV' at: the prtDdpal. use. UM8
_lor buIIdlJlC to mai11ta1a. Ia a
....t anc1 aclequate _er. the
parldaC __ _a7S, 1&ac1-
__ anc1 ceq_ l_
s.. Ac.... alI off-street pa_c
spacee sbaU have aec:esa of! drtve-
wa:rs ana 110t dIrectIl' otl the pub-
Uc~
8.011 na- Olf-Street Spaca Required.
(oae ~ce equals _ sq.. ft.l
I ana 3 famUy residences
Multiple dwe\llDp
3 spa... per dwei1IDe uaiC.
Church... the3ters. auditoriums.
mortUU'le:S and. ot.her places at
aaembl,..
1 space for eac:b. 3 seats or for
. eacI1 $ ft. of pew length. Baaed.
upon ~WIl desiCD. c:apactY.
BusiDeslI &: prafoatoaal omces.
1 space tor eacl1 m sq. tt. 01:
croa door space.
Medical &: D...taI cIIa.Ics
5 spaces per doc:tor or deatlst.
Rote1. Motel
I sPace per UDlt plus 1 additloDa1
$'-pace tor eac.b. 8 w:uts.
Sanitorium.. c:anvalesc:en'C home.
rest home. Qurs1J:lC nome or
1nst1tu.UOD. .
At leut 1 parlclne SIlKe tor eacl1
40 beelS tor wl1iell accommodatlDaS
are otferec1. plus. 1 parkinC space
tor eac.b. % employees on max:imum
slIjfc.
To be deCerml11e<! wl1_ speda1
\1M penDi' ~ iauecL
BowllDe AIIeJ'
At 1_ 5 parklne spaces for each
aile,.. pIua a<idltIm1a1 spac:ee ..
may be _ed. herel11 for re-
laCed. ..- sucll .. a restauraac.
Motor l!Uel Statioa
At 1_ 40 olf-street parldDC spaca
plus Z otl-stteet par\CiDC spaces
tor _ service sQ\L
lleQIl Scar.
At 1_ 1 otl-stteet parlclne space
lIor _ uo sq. :t. of croaa lIoor
area..
Ilestauraaa. cat... l1ars. taverns.
D1Cht e1uAa
At 1_ I space for each 3 seats
_ ... oapacity deslca.
FumiCUrw store. wl1aYAle allCa
SlUes. repaa sI10pa
M determined. by the Township
Board. foUowml revlew by the
PlaD1UZ1C Co'"'" ._1.....
8..09 OlT-snu:ET LOADING AND
UNLOADING AREAS
(AI Loc:atioa
All required loadIDe berths sI1aI1
be otl-screet aDd sI1aI1 be located.
oa. the same lat U th.. bwld.1DC or
".. to be Ml'Yed.. A laadlDe berth
sI1aI1 DOC be loc:aCed. leSlI tl1atl twea-
t:J'-dve teet .tram. the 1ntenecttOQ
of CWO (31 street riCl1ta-of-way Dor
Iea thaa MtT (SOl teet tram a
resId...~ district UDl_ withID. a
bwIc1.lDC. I.oadInC bertlIS shall not
occupy tha requirec1 traIlt 7U<l
--
(B) Slu
UnIea otherwtM spec1lIed. 111 tl1Ia
0T<I1aaI1ce a reqWred loadIDc bertIl
sI1aI1 be DOC leSlI th.an twelve (131
leet 111 width. twentY-dye (351 feet
ID. 1."Cth. UDleSll suted. .. dfty-
live :55.1 teeC" aIla touneea (1.1 teet
ID. heiChe. exclusive of aisle anc1
maneuvennc space.
(Cl Acceso
Each required. 10adIDc berth shaI1
be lOCil:tect witb. appropriate me&na
at vehic:uiar access to a street or
publ1c: alley in a ma.a.ner which. w1l1
lean inter.t:ere With traJfic.
(DI SurfaciDC
All loa~ bertho ana access-
ways sb.all be imProvect With a
cturaele material to contrOl the
d.ust and. draJn,age accordinl to a
t..~", approved. by the ToWDStliP
eer.
lEI Accssory Use
M" space aIIocaCed. .. a loadIDe
bertn or maneuvennc area so aa
to campi,. WltIl tha terms of this
OrU1DaDca shall not De used. tor the
starale of gooc1o. inoperable veb1-
des or be included. as a part of: the
soaee reqwrements necessary to
meet the olf-street parkin; area.
IFl In oonnect!oD with an,. struc-
ture whic:b. is to be erected or sub-
staatlally altered.. ana wl1Iell ....
qUIreS the receipt or distriDutioD of
materiaJ.s or merd1aDdise by truc:ka
or sim1lar vehicles. there shall b.
pCOYlded. olf-street loadIDC SIlac:e.
(GI Where Daise from 10adlDC or
uaioadIDc act1vtty ~ audible in a
resldea~ dIs1:ric:t. the ac:uYlty sl1:al1
terminate l)etw.... tl1e houn of
.1;00 p.m. anc1 T a.m.
(HI B8quIrec1 t.oadIaC Bertha
, 1. Non-residential uses havlnC
s.ooo squue leet of lIoor space or
more net inducted as part of (2) or
(31 bmo-tour thOusand (4.0001 to
_tY thOusaDd (30.0001 square
fee'C floor area. one load.1DC berth:
:or each a<idltlonal t... thousan4
UO.ooo) square teet at door area or
t:r:ac:UoA U1ere01. above one-!ourtb.
( ~ I .... 111 addItIoIIaI ioadlDC
berth.
:. Retail SaIes. 0_. Public
AcImI11iatratilla BwldIDcs. H05P1ta11.
Sc:l1ools. Hotels. and SlauIar Use-
For such a bu1IdlDC haYiAC live
thousanc1 (5.000) to t... thousan4
(lO.OOcn square feet of floor area
...e 111 olf-street 10ac1l11e berth.
3. ManufacturinC. Fabricatioa.
WarehousmC. Storme. ServtcinC and
SIm1I.ar Establlslunen__For sucIl a
bu1IdlDC haviac two thOusand
(%.0001 to thirty th_ (30.0001
square teet at floor area. on8 (1)
loa<IIDl( berth dfty-live (:151 feet
!..ll lenCtll-
4. Manufac:tUriDc. Fabricatl....
Processml' ~ WarehoUSUlc-For
bull<IIDcs ltaY1De over 30.000 squue
feee. 10adIDC facUiti.. sIuU1 be
provided a' the ratio at aile load-
1ZIC berth litty-!ive ('5) teet Ia
length for each ~.OOO additional
square teet pIllS one loadine Derth
tweutY-five (~) feet in leneth tor
each ODe bu.ndred. thousand. (100.-
000) squua .!eet. Bw.l.c11nCS havinC
Page 13
E/z717/
fAYINb t t:A//Ze?/H b IU3"6XJI !Zar1ernS
?,Nlf/b ,U/&6lt-o'tb
~~/p. ~fp
c.. I ClIP c.. / ~ r' ,::;,plY1ll4erH,5
(/ rry
, lI./'lo/tCA
"'.fft.e~
8l..AIfJe
ft.ocMIHb7Z'H
el!t:rJttJr1-/ f?~
a:;~Vlue
cWMlPUN
c.HAHrlA?!efl
t:-;+A-?,i;4
~pot-l PAr/p:;>
e t::eN ?P,4',e.- 8
e~ l2/Ve,e.
kAttel/IUS
.!.!!.t1R:..e" ~(,Ie
~~
?$ItJlZ-tAJCe
M/J/t{,!?(J!{1;>TA
Hew P/flU1Pfi
,eAM~
"7r, LlC-, f"A/Lt=..
~.
\
" . ., .- 0 ~ ~ "
III .. ,. . . .. " ~
" . " ~ .e-e-G
. .. ., fI ~ . "
.- " . . . " . .
" " /) ~ ~e- e e
. . .. ~ 411 . " .
., 0 " .. .. " .
~ " .. " . Q .. ~
.. 0 . e . G . 0
, . .- " . . . .
.. . .. ee e e
" " , . .e .. "
., .;II o , " " 6J .
.- . II #1 e;f?ee
.. . o ., e: lii' e !3
" . Q e Ie- c e-e
e:< IN FP:ort-r of WfLPIH6
&.. p?~1p /P .:'VGe (~) FAfi!#J~5PAC1i6
.J;r -= A5 ~f.2&.!7 ~~ c.ny e,.<l6fH l:EJ!!:. r=o,.e:. P.e4/;..!.A6
6# Af/2E441tCe ml2~GXeMPI J;?VeT2' FlArt?HD6M;:-
& .: .lZ86)()/ ;Zt;rp sf( c;(7Y t;H€:If./&ee..
!3.-s!-ltff..e.t:iiifp.-/H ~~ OP~6f}...tbotZRT~~.
e:: Nt:1T 8'1" p,eP/HAt>/J!!;6
.,OOtllo...
e1 " ~ /I Q ., ~ IE e;" / ~ U7Y cAN A-,P'r:z:,;ZP
~1I6'Ot~~"
I
c-:s t:-d,vrM~/rC,:- VI ~-- a-IQfi!4Io/
/ &,. I N~jZI~ F.;II.. fiV,t/.
)
7.
Striping.
Except for single-family, two-family, townhouse and
quadraminium dwellings, all parking stalls shall be marked
with white or yellow painted lines not less than four (4")
inches wide.
8.
Lighting.
(a) All off-street parking areas for residential uses of
twelve (12) or more spaces and all off-street parking for
commercial, industrial, institutional, and public uses
shall be equipped with operable lighting designed to
illuminate the entire surface of the parking area to a
minimum level of one (1) foot-candle at ground level.
shall not apply to neighborhood parks as identified in
Andover Comprehensive park System and Recreation Plan,
amended.
This
the
as
(b) Any lighting used to illuminate the off street parking
area shall be arranged as to reflect the light away from
adjoining property.
1'- Curbing. -lE-
All driveways, loading areas, parking areas and storage
areas shall be bounded by poured-in-place concrete. curb and
gutter, except for single-family, two-family, townhouse and
quadriminium dwellings.
(a) The City may exempt curbing where the City has
approved future expansion of the parking lot.
(b) poured-in-p1ace concrete traffic safety islands may be
required to maintain a safe and orderly flow of traffic
within the parking lot and shall be approved by the city
Engineer.
F. Required Screening.
~9.
,
I
,-./.
All off-street parking lots containing six (6) or more spaces,
shall be screened from those residential properties abutting the
property on which the parking lot is located, except such lots
which serve single-family attached or detached units.
1. Screening Standards. Screening shall be installed so as to
block direct vision.
(a) Screening/shall consist of a compact evergreen or
deciduous hedge of sufficient width and density or an earth
berm of sufficient height to provide an effective screen
throughout the year.
(1) At planting. hedge material must be at least
three (3') feet in height.
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
April 2, 1991
DATE
BY:
ITEM Amend Ordinance No. 8
NO. Sections 4.05 & 6.02
.:/,.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT 0 ?')
Planning 'i:r
'-""
David L. Carlberg
City planner
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Discussion Items
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to review the proposed
amendment to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05 (K), relating to
accessory structures and the proposed amendment to Section 6.02,
relating to minimum garage requirements.
BACKGROUND
Section 4.05 (k)
The City Council, on February 19, 1991, referred the amendment to
Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05 (K) to the Planning and Zo~ing for
further review. The Planning & Zoning Commission on March 12,
1991, made an amendment to Section 4.05 (K) that would prohibit
pole buildings in all residential districts on parcels of three
acres (3a.) or less and within the Metropolitan Urban Services
Area (see the attached proposed amendment, report and minutes from
the March 12, 1991 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting).
Section 6.02
Staff had also proposed to the Planning and Zoning Commission, on
March 12, 1991, that Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 be amended to
require a 440 sq. ft. garage be constructed on a property prior to
the conversion of an existing garage to livable space (see the
attached proposed amendment, report and minutes from the March 12,
1991 Planning and zoning Commission meeting).
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
, ,
\
,--,,' TO
SECOND BY
~-)
~
.~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORD NO. 8
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1971;
ORDINANCE NO. 8F, EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 19, 1980; ORDINANCE NO. 8I,
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 21, 1980; ORDINANCE NO. 8U, EFFECTIVE JULY 19,
1983; AND ORDINANCE NO. 8DDD, EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 1, 1988 KNOWN AS
THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No.8, effective January 1, 1971; Ordinance No. 8F,
effective February 19, 1980; Ordinance No. 8I, effective October
21, 1980; Ordinance No. 8U, effective July 19, 1983; Ordinance No.
8DDD, effective November 1, 1988 are hereby amended as follows:
SECTION 4.05
ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES.
K. No permanent sheet metal, painted or unpainted accessory
building, except small garden sheds not exceeding one hundred
twenty (120) square feet, shall be allowed on parcels of three
acres (3 a.l or less in a~5~~~e~5-geRea-R-3-aRa-R-4 all
residential districts and within the Metropolitan Urban Service
Area (MUSA) Boundary. The foregoing shall not apply to painted
and finished metal siding normally used on residential structures.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this ____ day
of , 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
victoria Volk, City Clerk
,J
\
" /
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORD NO. 8
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, KNOWN AS THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 is hereby amended as follows:
Section 6.02
Garage:
R-l
*****440
R-2
*****440
R-3
*****440
R-4
*****440
***** Requires an additional 440 sq. ft. garage to be constructed
before the required minimum 440 sq. ft. attached garage is
converted to livable space.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day
of , 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
victoria Volk, City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
March 12, 1991
DATE
AGENDA ITEM
3. Public Hearing
Amend Ord. No. 8
Sec. 4.05 & 6.02
ORIGINATING DEPARTMEN~
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
BY: city planner
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the
proposed amendments to Orqinance No.8, Section 4.05 and Section
6.02.
SECTION 4.05 BACKGROUND
On February 19, 1991 the City Council refered the attached
proposed amendment to the Planning and Zoning Commission for
further review and consideration. When Ordinance No.8, Section
4.05 (K) was amended November 1, 1988, it was the intent to
prohibit the construction of pole buildings within districts zoned
R-3 and R-4 within the MUSA area. However, the Ordinance as now
written, can be interpreted to allow accessory structures (pole
buildings) on parcels of more than three (3) acres within
districts zoned R-3 and R-4 within the Metropolitan Urban Services
Area (MUSA).
In order to give the history on how Section 4.05 (K) of Ordinance,
No. 8 has been amended since its adoption on January 1, 1971,
please review the attached reports and minutes.
SECTION 6.02 BACKGROUND
The proposed amendment to Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02, would
require those residents who convert an attached 440 sq. ft. garage
to livable space, to provide on the site an additional 440 sq. ft.
garage. This would ensure the City that th7 minimum required
garage space would still exist. No converS1on of a garage to
livable space would be allowed unless a garage with a minimum 440
sq. ft. is constructed. /
~.
The proposed amendment is attached for Commission review.
'\.
)
CITY of ANDOVER
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING - MARCH 12. 1991
MINUTES
The Regula~ BI-Monthly Meeting of the Andove~ PlannIng and ZonIng
Commission was called to o~de~ by Chai~pe~son Ron Fe~~Is on Ma~ch 12.
1991. 8:01 p.m.. at the Andove~ City Hal I, 1685 C~osstown Bouleva~d
NW. Andove~. Minnesota.
Commissione~s p~esent:
Steve Jonak. Bev Jovanovich, Randall Peek.
Marc McMu II en
Becky Pease. Bonnie Dehn
City Planner. David Carlberg
CommIssioners absent:
Also present:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Feb~ua~y 26. 1991: Page 6, Fifth paragraph, Correct "Ordinance 28" to
"Ordinance 23".
MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Jovanovich, app~oval of the Minutes with
the co~rection as noted. Motion ca~ried on a 3-Yes. 2-Abstain (Jonak.
McMullen), 2-Absent (Pease. Dehn) vote.
PUBLIC HEARING: AMEND ORDINANCE 8. SECTIONS 4.05 AND 6.02
Chai~pe~son Fe~~is began the publIc hea~Ing at 8:03 p.m. M~. Ca~lbe~g
outlined the p~oposed cla~ification to SectIon 4.05 ~ega~ding the
construction of pole buIldings within the MUSA- a~ea. The o~dInance as
w~Itten can be Inte~preted to aIlowpole buIldings on pa~cels of more
than three acres withIn the MUSA In dIstrIcts zoned R-3 and R-4. In
revIewing the background, it appea~s the Intent was to keep pole
buildIngs out of the developing MUSA a~ea. They a~e not desirable in
the higher-density a~eas fo~ aesthetics and because there would be the
burden of ~emoving them if the pa~cel is subdivIded In the futu~e.
M~. Carlberg poInted out several pa~cels In the MUSA that a~e g~eate~
than th~ee ac~es. Chai~pe~son Fe~~is questIoned whethe~ It is ove~ly
~est~ictIve to not allow a poVe buildIng on a pa~cel of three acres of
mo~e in the MUSA area. He suggested it be allowed by Special Use
Permit wIth the stipulation!~hat it would be removed when the parcel
Is subdIvIded.
:,j
The CommIssion dIscussed that application in seve~al different
scena~ios and felt the g~eatest conce~n is that even by a SpecIal Use
Pe~mIt, a pole buildIng could be placed withIn 10 feet of a lot lIne.
whIch could be undesi~able to a nelghbo~ on a small lot. It was felt
the~e ~eally would not be that much cont~ol even with a SUP because
the .st~uctu~e could be placed on the sIte as long as it met the
setback ~equI~ements, etc. They also noted the va~ious changes to the
o~dinances that would need to be made to include pole buildings as a
special use in the MUSA on parcels three acres in size or g~eate~.
'0"
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - Ma~ch 12. 1991
Page 2
'J
<Public Hea~ing: Amend O~dinance 8, Sections 4.05 & 6.02, Continued)
The Commission thenag~eed the o~dinance with the p~oposed amendment
is bette~ than allowing pole buildings in the MUSA by a Special Use
Pe~mit. They discussed the best wo~ding in the o~dinance to cla~ify
that pole buildings would not be allowed in R-3 and R-4 dist~icts
within the MUSA at all, but they would be allowed in the ~u~al a~ea on
lots th~ee ac~es in size o~ mo~e. Also. it was felt the amendment
should be wo~ded such that it would not have to be changed as the MUSA
line expanded. The following wo~ding was ag~eed to:
"No pe~manent sheet metal...shall be allowed on pa~cels of th~ee
ac~es <3 a.) o~ less in all ~esidential dist~icts and within the
Met~opolitan U~ban Se~vice A~ea <MUSA) Bounda~y..."
M~. Ca~lbe~g pointed out this section of the o~dinance deals with
~esidential a~eas only. The comme~cial a~eas a~e dealt with in a
sepa~ate section of the o~dinance.
The hea~ing was opened fo~ publiC testimony. The~e being none.
Chai~pe~son Fe~~is asked fo~ a motion ~o close the public hea~ing.
MOTION by McMullen. Seconded by Jovanovich. to so move. Motion
ca~~ied on a 5-Yes <Fe~~is. Jonak, Jovanovich, McMullen, Peek),
2-Absent <Pease, Dehn) vote.
MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Jovanovich, to amend O~dinance 8,
Section 4.05. Pa~ag~aph K, Inse~ting the following in the fou~th line:
"...o~ iess in all ~esidential dist~icts and within the Met~opolitan
U~ban Se~vice A~ea <MUSA) bounda~y.n The ~est of the existing
o~dinance to ~emain as w~itten. A publiC hea~ing was held. The~e was
no comment. Motion ca~~ied on a 5-Yes <Fe~~is. Jonak. Jovanovich.
McMullen. Peek), 2-Absent <Pease, Dehn) vote.
M~. Ca~lbe~g then ~eviewed the p~oposed amendment to O~dinance 8,
Section 6.02 to ~equi~e those ~esidents who conve~t an attached 440-
squa~e-foot ga~age to. livable/space to fi~st p~ovide on the site an
additional 440-Squa~e-foot g~~age. This ensu~es the City that the
minimum ~equi~ed ga~age space would still exist.
/
"
The hea~ing was opened fo~ publiC testimony. The~e being none,
Chai~pe~son Fe~~is asked fo~ a motion to close the publiC hea~ing.
MOTION by McMullen, Seconded by Jovanovich, to so move. Motion
ca~~ied on a 5-Yes <Fe~~is, Jonak, Jovanovich, McMullen, Peek),
2-Absent <Pease, Dehn) vote.
, '\
,~
~J
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - Macch 12. 1991
Page 2
'Public Heacing: Amend Ocdinance 8, Sections 4.05 & 6.02. Continued)
The Commission thenagceed the ocdinance with the pcoposed amendment
is bettec than allowing pole buildings In the MUSA by a Special Use
Pecmit. They discussed the best wocding in the ocdinance to clacify
that pole buildings would not be al lowed in R-3 and R-4 disteicts
within the MUSA at all, but they would be allowed in the cueal acea on
lots theee acees in size oe moce. Also. it was felt the amendment
should be woeded such that it would not have to be changed as the MUSA
1 ine expanded. The following woeding was ageeed to:
"No peemanent sheet metal.. .shall be allowed on paecels of theee
acces '3 a.) oc less in all eesidential dlsteicts and within the
Metcopolitan Ucban Seevice Acea <MUSA) Boundacy..."
Me. Caclbeeg pointed out this section of the oedinance deals with
eesidential aceas only. The commeccial aceas aee dealt with in a
sepaeate section of the oedlnance.
The heacing was opened foe public testimony. Thece being none.
Chaiepeeson Feeeis asked foe a motion ~o close the public heaeing.
MOTION by McMullen. Seconded by Jovanovich. to so move. Motion
caecied on a 5-Yes 'Feceis. Jonak. Jovanovich, McMullen. Peek).
2-Absent 'Pease, Dehn) vote.
MOTION by Peek. Seconded by Jovanovich. to amend Ocdlnance 8,
Section 4.05. Pacagcaph K, lnsecting the following in the foueth lIne:
".. .oc less in all eesidential distcicts and wi thin the Metcopoli tan
Ucban Secvice Acea 'MUSA) boundacy." The cest of the existing
ocdinance to cemain as wcitten. A public heacing was held. Theee was
no comment. Motion caccied on a 5-Yes CFeccis. Jonak. Jovanovich.
McMullen. Peek). 2-Absent 'Pease. Dehn) vote.
Me. Caclbecg then ceviewea the pcoposed amendment to Ocdinance 8.
Section 6.02 to cequice those cesidents who convect an attached 440-
squace-foot gacage to livable'space to ficst pcovide on the site an
additional 440-squace-foot ga~age. This ensuces the City that the
minimum cequiced gacage space would still exist.
. I,'
,;,
, .
The heacing was opened focpublic testImony. Thece being none.
Chaicpecson Feccis asked foc a motIon to close the publiC heacing.
MOTION by McMullen. Seconded by Jovanovich. to so move. Motion
caccied on a 5-Yes 'Feecis. Jonak. Jovanovich. McMullen. Peek).
2-Absent 'Pease. Dehn) vote.
,J
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - Maech 12. 1991
Page 3
,
\
'J
<Public Heaeing: Amend Oedinance 8. Sections 4.05 & 6.02. Continued)
MOTION by Peek. Seconded by McMullen. to amend O~dinance 8. Section
6.02. and the amendment would consist of adding the following notation
to the ~est of the ~equieed ga~age sizes fo~ R-1, R-2. R-3. R-4 zones:
"Requiees an additional 440-squaee-foot ga~age to be const~ucted
befo~e the eequieed minimum 440-squa~e-foot-ga~age is conve~ted to
livable space." A publiC heaeing was held. Theee was no comment.
Motion ca~~ied on a 5-Yes <Fe~~is. Jonak. Jovanovich. McMullen. Peek).
2-Absent <Pease. Dehn) vote.
The amendments will be on the Ap~il 2 Regulae City Council agenda.
Hea~ings closed at 8:51 p.m.
DISCUSSION - PAINT BALL/WAR GAME OPERATIONS
Me. Caelbeeg eeviewed the eesea~ch he did on the mattee of
paint ball/wa~ game ope~ations. In eeviewing the oedinances. he found
that such opeeations a~e cue~ently allowed by a Special Use Peemit in
the Geneeal Receeation Dist~icts pe~ O~dinance 8. Section 7.01. By
definition it is a commeecial eeceeational use because it is open to
the publiC fo~ a fee. At the peesent fime. no aeea in the City is
designated GR. One consideeation may be to specifY such activities in
the ocdinance as a special use.
Me. Caelbeeg also noted the oedlnance allows commeecial eeceeational
as an allowed use in the Gene~al Business zones: howevee. the City
does not have a large GB zone wheee this type of activity could be
done.
In discussing the issue. the Planning Commission did not feel the need
to speCify .paint ball/wac game opecations' as a special use in the GR
disteict~ 'It is cleacly a commercial eec~eational activity by
definition. and they did not wish to amend the ocdinance fo~ evecy new
type of activity that comes along. They also agreed that no change
needs to be made to the ocdlnance. If someone wishes to have this
type of activity in the CIty, it needs to be In a GR zone by special
use o~ in a GB dist~ict. and a.ll commercIal business cequirements
would need to be met such as packing, rest~oom facilities. licensing
foc ~efceshments. etc. /1
1/
</
'\
'-)
'"
/ '\
,--.J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
April 2, 1991
DATE
ITEM Paint Ball -
NO, 3. Wa r Game s
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT TI
Planning ~
David L. carlber~
City planner
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NOo Discussion Items
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to discuss Paint Ball and
War Games Operations being conducted in the City.
BACKGROUND
The City Council, on February 5, 1991 referred the item to the
Planning and Zoning Commission for further review. The Planning
and Zoning Commission, at their February 26, 1991 meeting, tabled
the item until their March 12, 1991 meeting. At the March 12th
meeting, staff presented to the Commission the attached report.
Staff had found that Paint Ball/War Game operations are an allowed
use in GB, General Business Districts and allowed by Special Use
Permit in GR, General Recreation Districts. The City currently
does not have land zoned for General Recreation purposes,
therefore, a rezoning would have to occur in addition to obtaining
a Special Use Permit. The City also has very limited amounts of
land zoned General Business (except for the landfill) and such
operations would require a large tract of land to operate thus, a
rezoning would also have to occur.
The City currently has a "War Games" operation located at 17700
Ward Lake Drive. The company running the establishment is Midwest
Paint Ball, Inc. out of North St. Paul. The operation is being
conducted in a residential district (R-1) and is not permitted
according to Ordinance No.8, the Zoning Ordinance. Staff will be
sending letters to Midwest Paint Ball, Inc. and the property owner
informing them that said operation must cease.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council take no action on the item.
Staff finds said operations are properly regulated by Ordinance
No.8, the Zoning Ordinance.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'--I
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
,Minutes - Ma~ch 12. 1991
,)Page 3
(Public Hea~ing: Amend O~dinance 8. Sections 4.05 & 6.02. Continued)
MOTION by Peek. Seconded by McMullen. to amend O~dinance 8. Section
6.02. and the amendment would consist of adding the following notation
to the ~est of the ~equi~ed ga~age sizes fo~ R-1, R-2. R-3. R-4 zones:
"Requi~es an additional 440-squa~e-foot ga~age to be const~ucted
befo~e the ~equi~ed minimum 440-squa~e-foot-ga~age is conve~ted to
livable space." A public hea~ing was held. The~e was no comment.
Motion ca~~ied on a 5-Yes (Fe~~is. Jonak. Jovanovich. McMullen. Peek).
2-Absent (Pease. Dehn) vote.
The amendments wil I be on the Ap~il 2 Regula~ City Council agenda.
Hea~ings closed at 8:51 p.m.
~ DISCUSSION - PAINT 3ALL/WAR GAME OPERATIONS
M~. Ca~lbe~g ~eviewed the ~esea~ch he did on the matte~ of
paint ball/wa~ game ope~ations. In ~eviewing'the o~dinances. he found
that such ope~ations a~e cu~~ently allowed'by a Special Use Pe~mit in
the Gene~al Rec~eation Dist~icts pe~ O~dinance 8. Section 7.01. By
definition it is a comme~cial ~ec~eatIonal use because it is open to
the public fo~ a fee. At the p~esent time. no a~ea in the City is
designated GR. One conside~ation may be to specifY such activities in
the o~dinance as a special use.
M~. Ca~lbe~g also noted the o~dlnance allows comme~cial ~ec~eatIonal
as an allowed use in the Gene~al' Business zones: however-. the City
does not have a la~ge GB zone whe~e this type of activity could be
done.
In discussing the issue. the Planning Commission dId not feel the need
to specifY "paint ball/wa~ game ope~atlons. as a special.use in the GR
distdct:. It' is cleady a comme~cial r-ecr-eational activity by
definition. and they did not wish to amend the or-dinance fo~ ever-y new
type of activity that comes along. They also agreed that no change
needs to be made to the o~dlnance. If someone wishes to have this
type of activity in the City, it needs to be in a GR zone by special
use o~ in a GB dist~ict, and aLl comme~clal business ~equi~ements
would need to be met such as ~ar-king, ~est~oom facilitIes. licensing
fo~ r-ef~eshments. etc. II;'
///
.,.oj
Rega~dlng the paint ball/wac game ope~atlons that have been said to be
oper-ating off of War-d Lake D~ive, M~. Ca~lbe~g stated he would info~
both the ope~ato~s of the activity and the p~ope~ty owner- of the City
o~dinances.
\
./
'1
Planning and Zoning
Minutes - Ma~ch 12.
.page 4
Commission Meeting
1991
~
<Discussion - Paint Ball/Wa~ Game Ope~ations. Continued)
MOTION by McMullen. Seconded by Peek. that we endo~se the Staff
~ecommendation and leave the o~dinance as is, that paint ball/wa~ game
ope~ations can be ope~ated in the Gene~al Rec~eational o~ Gene~al
Business a~eas as pe~mitted uses pe~ the existIng o~dinances. Motion
ca~~ied on a 5-Yes <Fe~~is. Jonak, JovanovIch, McMullen. Peek).
2-Absent <Pease. Dehn) vote.
Chal~pe~son Fe~~is - cla~ified his vote noting it is not a vote in
favo~ of o~ against the spo~t. The Commission took the ~esponsibility
of how to cont~ol it and not whethe~ o~ not it should be allowed.
The item wi II be on the Apd I 2 Ci ty Counci I agenda.
The CommIssion ~ecessed at 9:12: ~econvened at 9:21 p.m.
OTHER BUSINESS
M~. Ca~lbe~g noted that on the Hagen Special Use Pe~mit <2646 133~d'
Lane SUP fo~ in-home beauty salon), the City Atto~ney has advised that
the 20-pe~cent ~equi~ement ~ecommended as a condItion of the pe~mlt by
the Planning Commission is not applicable In this case. The
20-pe~cent ~equi~ement applies when livable space Is being conve~ted.
In this case. the conve~sion Is occu~~ing in an accesso~y st~uctu~e.
the attached ga~age, so that ~equi~ement does not apply. Even with
the conve~sion, the applicant will still meet the 440-squa~e-foot
ga~age ~equi~ement.
Commissione~ McMullen stated he was absent when that pe~mit was
discussed: howeve~. he did ~eceive one call f~om a neighbo~lng
~esident who was opposed to the pe~mit.
MOTION by Jovanovich. Seconded by Peek. to amend the motion made on
Feb~ua~y 26 on the Hagen Special Use Pe~mit by ~emoving that
condition. that the size of the beauty salon not exceed 20 pe~cent of
the size of the livable squa~e footage of the house. Motion ca~~ied on
a 5-Yes <Fe~~is. Janak. Jovanovich. McMullen. Peek). 2-Absent <Pease.
Dehn) vote.;
.;'
./
:J
M~. Ca~lbe~g ~epo~ted Anoka County. has hi~ed an Envi~onmental Office~
who will be enfo~cing A~ticle III with ~ega~d to the disposal of
haza~dous waste by businesses in the City. He has supplied the county
with the names of all businesses within the City. and they will be
checking to find out if the~e a~e any haza~dous wastes o~ chemicals
being handled by them. M~. Carlbe~g stated he ~equested that the City
and,the Fi~e Depa~tment be sent copies of the which businesses a~e
involved. whe~e they a~e located. and what is on those p~emises.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE
March 12, 1991
AGENDA ITEM
4. Discussion - Paint-
ball/ War Games
Operations
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT 1)
Planning ~
. David L. Carlberg
BY: City Planner
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked by the City
Council to examine the operation of Paintball/War Games within the
City of Andover. This item was tabled at the February 26, 1991
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting pending further information.
BACKGROUND
The Commission requested Staff to contact the League of Minnesota
Cities to obtain information (ordinances) from other cities who
have Paintball/War Games operations and how they are regulated or
who have had requests and how they have handled them.
Staff was informed by the League of Minnesota Cities that they had
no ordinance regulating Paintball/War Games. The League did
direct Staff to the City of prior Lake who had had a request and
denied said request. In talking with Mr. Horst Graser, Planning
Director, Staff learned that prior Lake had.a similar operation
called "Splat Ball". The operation was located in an agricultural
district. This district allows open land recreational uses. The
City determined that splat ball games would be allowed by a
conditional use permit in this district. The Prior Lake Planning
Commission at the public hearing denied the request as did the
City. Problems the City of Prior Lake found associated with splat
ball operartions included: '
1. Lack of on-site parking facilities - participants parked on
county road.
2.
3.
Lack of restroom facilities.
! .
Noise pollution - sc~eamlng and shouting during operating
hours.
Mr. Graser informed me that the operation was deemed a commercial
use, but the City received no benefit for the betterment of the
City. Also, the majority of the people playing the game were not
residents of prior Lake. The operation was considered a "negative
environment" by the City.
,J
\
/
~,
\
)
Page Two
Paint Ball Discussion
March 12, 1991
The Commission had also inquired if Ordinance No. 51, the Outdoor
Party Ordinance, is applicable. . Staff has determined that
Ordinance No. 51 does not apply. The Ordinance deals specifically
with parties lasting no more than 24 hours. Staff interprets the
Ordinance as pertaining to graduation, wedding, birthday parties,
etc.~ those parties that would not be conducted on a daily basis.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW
currently, such operations are allowed in districts zoned General
Business (GB) as permitted uses as defined in Ordinance No.8,
Section 7.01 and by Special Use Permit in General Recreation
Districts as defined in Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03.
Attached for your review and consideration are the Staff Report
presented to the City Council on February 5, 1991 and the minutes
from that meeting; the report presented to the Commission on
February 26, 1991 and the minutes from that meeting; and an
article from the Minneapolis Tribune.
Ordinance No.8, Section
....~
.' \
,--I
~
\
_ ,J
Church: A building, together with its accessory buildings
and uses, where persons regularly assemble for religious .
worship and which building, together with its accessory
buildings and uses, is maintained and controlled by a
religious body organized to sustain public worship.
Club: A non-profit association of persons who are bona fide
members paying annual dues. Their club structure, meeting
place or lodge is a premises restricted to club members and
their.guests where food and drink may be served on such
premises, providing adequate dining room space and kitchen
facilities are available in compliance with the applicable
Federal, State, and Municipal laws.
Commercial Feed Lot: An area where fifteen (15) or more non-
domestlc animals are confined.
Commercial Recreation: A recreation facility operated as a
bUSlness and open to the public for a fee. (8WW, 10-6-87)
Commercial vehicle: Any vehicle, including, truck, semi-
tractor, van prlmarily used for the movement of cargo or
passengers in the normal operation of a business. Commercial
vehicles shall not be limited to vehicles with advertising
permanently or temporarily affixed to the body of the
vehicle. (8KKK,1-16-90)
Comprehensive Plan: Unless otherwise stated, it is the
general plan for land use, transportation, and community
facilities prepared and maintained by the community planning
commission.
Community: City of Andover.
Condominiums: A form of individual ownership of property as
defined by the Uniform Condominium Act of the state of
Minnesota. (8BB, 4-2-85)
Curb Level: The grade elevation established by the governing
body of the curb in front of the center of the building.
Where no curb level has been established, the engineering
staff shall determine a curb level or its equivalent for the
purpose of this Ordinance.
Day Care Center: Any facility, public or private, that for
compensation or otherwise, provides for the, care of children
outside their homes for periods of less than twenty-four (24)
hours per day. Day care centers include, but are not limited
to, day nurseries, nursery schools, child care centers and
day care facilities. (8WW, 10-6-87)
,
Density Zoning: Density zoning shall be interpreted to mean
the permlsslon of lower density (lot areas) standardsounder
conditions whereby the number of dwelling units permitted is
.not greater than permitted by the application of the regular
provision of the District but with all land excluded from the
lot area requirements added onto public or semi-public open
space (park, playground, school site, walkway or other
approved. open green space.)
Page 5
.(~
\ -.
,
. .......
,1.
~
') 0
'--'~
Ordinance No.8, Section
Land which is wooded, or which has a changing topography, and low
land which tends to be poor agriculturally, is also the most
expensive to develop for residential sites and after development,
the sites tend to be expensive to maintain. Such areas are the
most interesting and most susceptible to large lot development,
The district also is intended to preserve productive land for
Agricultural use.
R-2 Single Family Estate District
This district is intended to provide a residential atmosphere for
those persons desiring a single family neighborhood with a
suburban density. The areas may be transitional ones set aside
for various lot sizes to assure a wide selection of building sites
and re-subdivision at a later date. A density as proposed may
permit economical installation of sewer and water at a later date.
R-3 Single Family Suburban
This particular district is intended to satisfy those persons who
prefer a medium sized lot.
R-4 Single Family Urban
This district represents urban density use by single family
detached dwellings.
R-S Manufactured Housing
This district would permit all types of manufactured housing
including mobile homes and modular houses, provided public sewer
and water is provided.
M-l Multiple Dwelling
.This district is intended to provide a location for low density
attached dwelling units (townhouses) with private entrances.
These areas may be transitional, however, the townhouse resident
should have convenient access to all facilities provided for
single family neighborhoods.
M-2 Multiple Dwelling
This district is intended to provide a location for all types of
multiple dwellings. These areas may be transitional or on the
periphery of neighborhoods, however, the multiple dweller should
have convenient access to, all facilities provided for
neighborhoods.
GR
/
General Recreation'/
This district is intended to provide a location for all types of
commercial recreation uses such as golf driving ranges, outdoor
theaters, race tracks, and snowmobile areas, most of which require
large amounts of land and good separation from residential areas.
Page 48
'0-'
I
. ,-)
\)\
f\.
/
Ordinance No.8, .Section
~
adopted. On each new plat the lots are to be
developed in accordance with this section and shall
be so designated.
Single family residential buildings.
Urban Agricultural Uses.
~~5 Manufactured Housing
Mobile homes and modular homes provided they are
developed under a "Planned Unit Development" and the
complex is a minimum of twenty (20) acres or fifty
(50) dwelling units in size.
Multiple dwellings shall be permitted in'addition,
at a density as established in section 6.02 and as a
part of the planned unit development.
Permitted only in areas with public sanitary sewer
and water service. (8C, 10-17-78)
. M-l Multiple Dwelling
Townhouses not to exceed eight (8) units per
building with public sani~ary sewer and water
service.
M-l Single Family Attached Dwelling Units & Apartments
Single family attached dwelling units and apartments
not to exceed eight (8) per building or be more than
two (2) stories inlfiheight. Must have public
sanitary sewer and~ater. (8BB, 4-02-85)
M-2 Multiple Dwelling
Multiple dwellings with public sanitary sewer and
water service.
Townhouses not to exceed eight (8) units per
building at aM-l district designation with public
sanitary sewer and water service.
M-2 Single Family'Attached Dwelling Units & Apartments~
Single family attached dwelling units and apartments
not to exceed twenty-four (24) units per building or
be more than three (3) stories in height. Must have
public sa~itary sewer and water. (8BB, 4-02-85)
.'
RECREATIONAL DISTRICTS:
GR General Recreation District"
Cafes and restaurants
Golf courses
Information centers
Page 52
:
I
I ,-.
I "~.J
,
1
(
I.'
,
\ .
,
'-./
Ordinance No.8, Section
Motels and hotels
Resorts
Sporting goods and boat sales including service and
rental
Urban agricultural
BUSINESS DISTRICTS:
LB Limited Business
Business schools
Churches
Day Care Centers
Medical and dental clinics
Mortuaries and funeral homes
Professional offices
professional studios
Rest homes and nursing homes
Urban agricultural (8ZZ, 3-15-88)
NB Neighborhood Business
Day Care Centers
Financial Institutions
Medical and dental clinics
Mortuaries and funeral homes
Professional offices
Professional studios
'Restaurants
~ Retail trade and services (8ZZ, 3-15-88)
SC Shopping ~enter District'
,
,
All uses permitted in nNBn District.
Drop-in Child Care Center (8QQ, 5-19-87)
~B General Business District .
f\ 0 '~' ~ - 'Agencies selling or di'S~;laYing recreational
. \. '~",n; \j_ V. ".'; ~ vehicles, boats and marine equipment.
v -~ Commercial recreation, not including massage
Page 53
parlors
Ordinance No.8, Section
c)
,
/)'. D Wi.
, 1,'1; r ~
rv/! ~
~y \YtV
'\
/
/
Two-Family Home Conversions (R-4 Districts only) (8RR,
7-21-87)
Two-Family homes in R-4 and R-5 Districts only when lot
locations are established and approved on original plat
(8M, 9-1-:81)
MULTIPLE DISTRICTS
. All uses permitted by special use in Residential
Districts except dog kennels.
RECREATIONAL DISTRICT
GR General Recreation District
Commercial parks, camp grounds, trail rides, gun
clubs and ranges, archery ranges, race tracks,
commercial snowmobile courses
~commercial recreation other than specifically
permitted
Commercial riding stables
Dance Halls
Golf driving range and putting courses
Liquor License (8L, 7-21-81)
Marinas
Outdoor Theaters
Tavern as secondary use of property
BUSINESS DISTRICTS
. . .
LB Limited Business
Adult Use Businesses as defined in Ordinance #92 and
as amended~ (8NNN, 7-17-90)
Clubs and lodges
Liquor License (8L, 7-21-81)
Motels (8Z~, 3-15-88)
/
NB Neighborh~od Business
Outdoor display only during operating hours
Service station after minimum 2,000 sq, ft. of
retail floor space is constructed.'
veterinary clinic or pet hospital with no outsi.de
pens
Page 57
qJ
" \
V
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
April 2, 1991
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT \)
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Staff, Committee
ITEM
NO'4:
Equestrian Council
A ointments
REQUEST
The Andover City Council, on February 19, 1991, requested the
Equestrian Council to interview the applicants for the two
positions to be filled on the Equestrian Council. The Equestrian
Council will be interviewing the applicants on Monday, April 1,
1991. Staff will present their recommendation to the Council at
the meeting.
Attached is a list of the members of the Equestrian Council and
the dates their terms expire.
MOTION BY
"-
'.) TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
Equestrian Council
\
,--j
Chairman
John Bills
14367 prairie Road
Andover, MN 55304
434-5312
Term Expires 12/31/91
Members
Carol Almeida
249 Constance Bouevard
Andover, MN 55304
434-5303
Term Expires 12/31/92
Don Eveland
14744 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, MN 55304
755-5123
Term Expires 12/31/92
Sharon Orstad
16034 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Andover, MN 55304
434-6217
Term Expires 12/31/91
Ernest W. Trettel
1412 Andover Boulevard NW
Andover, MN 55304
Term Expires 12/31/92
Vacant
Term Expires 12/31/91
Vacant
Term Expires 12/31/92
(Revised 3/28/91)
, '\
. I
"-/
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
@
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Staff, Committee,
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Public Works
ITEM
NO.s:
street
uotes
BY:
Frank Stone
We have received two hourly quotes for street sweeping this year.
One from Clean Sweep at $55.90 per hour and one from Allied
Blacktop at $55.00 per hour.
I would recommend we give the street sweeping to Allied Blacktop
at $55.00 per hour. They could possibly start around the third
week of April. We would use two or more sweepers. The City will
furnish a water truck and dump trucks. Total hours will be around
325 hours with an estimated total cost of $17,875.00.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'---./
SKIU
@
BITUMINOUS CONTRACTORS
INlEGAlTY
March 19, 1991
Frank Stone
City of Andover
l685 Crosstown Blvd
Andover, MN 55303
Re: Equipment Rental Quotes for 1991 Street Sweeping
Dear Mr Stone,
Thank you for allowing us to quote on this year's street sweeping program.
The machines that we will be using for this service are as follows:
(2) 1982 Rosco hydrostatic, cab-enclosed, one-way broans.
(These machines are faster and more economical in rural-type
areas where there is no curb and gutter.)
(8) Elgin Pelican (l980 thru 1988) Street Sweepers.
The personnel that operate these machines are professional, having the ability to
repair and maintain their own machines. Most of our operators have been with Allied
for many years and their primary duty is running broans and sweepers.
I've mentioned our late model, top-conditioned and professionally operated machines
not to boast, but to assure you that you can have clean streets with the least possible
machine hours.
OUr rates for these machines, including operator's wage, are:
One-way broan - $45.00 per hour
Elgin Pelican Sweepers - $55.00 per hour**
**This hourly quote is with the intention that. the sweeping would be done in conjunction
with our sweeping program in Anoka County.
It's been our pleasure working with your fine cOlIlllUl1ity, either seal coating, and/or
sweeping in past years. We're hoping to see you again soon.
Thank you,
~ ~,--b.~
E j Capistrant
.~~ FJC{g12) 425-0575 FAX (612) 425-1046
(10503 89th Ave. No. Maple Grove, MN)
55369
"I rJ
nEAI1SWEEP
, )
"-
CLEAN SWEEP, INC.
13480 PIONEER TRAIL
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347
PHONE: 941-1440
FAX: 941-5270
.
MEMBER
EmMATE TO:
I
ANDOVER. CITY OF
ATTN: FRANK STONE
1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD
L ANDOVER, MN ::.5303
I
OFFER: This '"Estimate" is based on the "Terms and Conditions"
printed on the reverse side, the estimate of hours for
equipment, labor and materials shown below and attachments
(if any). This "Estimate" is void 30 days from the estimate date
shown below unless the original has been signed by an authorized
o 'cer or owner and returned to Clean Sweep. Ine.
.J
ACCOUNT SlS)"i' '6R~~~~'; ';~:c:tJSTOMER'CONTAcr':;-; ;:g,~O~ENO~/;, ;~WORIC..ClASSlRCATlON'
ESTIMATE.; , .;JOB'
DA~'" "..", NUMBER'
O~'5G09 08
FRAN:< STeNE
55-8118
S,~EEP I NG
02i l;::.i'7'l le1
. '
ITEM NO
.. .
o .
O~i009-.101
2.-4C
CITY OF ANDC\.JER
1-300
VARIOUS ~OCATIONS
ANDOVER, MN 55304
FRANK STONE
755-8118
1..00
** ESTIMATE HOURLY RATE 8ASIS **
** ESTIMATE STREETS & ROADWAYS SWEEP
ELGIN peWER SWE~PERiPER HOUR
ADDITIONAL 5% DISCOUNT IF
CAN BE DONE AFTER JUNE 15TH'~
ANDOVER TO PROVIDE DUMP TRue.
AND WATER FOR SWEEPER. ~
5~!. '~7'O
~j3 n i-
:
jl
.
:
.:
ti
..
SIGNED/TITLE
DATE
o LANDSCAPING
o PATCHING
t~~'4
li.~,.n;\l1~'
{i'\~~/ ~~~, \.: ',~~,',. ~:r):;>:t:,
;:,~~~:~f{~
TA)C ~:'<~:;',
u 0.. :
lEST. TOTAL ~
Be sure to read "Terms & Conditions of This Estimate" on
reverse side.
ACCEPTANCE: This -Estimata-. the terms and conditions printed
0" '"""tt reverse side, the estimate of hours for equipment. labor and
IT 'lis shown above and attachments (if any) are satisfactory. (1) (We)
ht. _ / authorize the performance of this work as indicated above.
PARKING AREA MAINTENANCE
o SWEEPING 0 SNOW PLOWING
o SCRUBBING
o SALT/SAND
o LAWN CARE
o SAND BARRELS
SUta 1959
o RETAINING WALLS 0 STRIPING
ORIGINAL E5nMA-
:,)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE nrril J, 1991
ITEM
NO,(p.
Approve Refinishing
Exterior of Public
Works Buildin
BY:
Frank stone
@)
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Staff, Committee,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Public Works
We would like to get started with repairs and painting of the
Fire/Public Works Building as soon as possible. This building is
in very bad shape and we should not let it go any longer. The
money to do this work should come out of the P.I.R. Fund.
The quote to repair this building from structural Restoration
Incorporated is $22,202.00.
My question is do we fund this project from the P.I.R. Fund and do
you want me to get other bids and go ahead with the project?
Administrator's Comments:
I recommend we fund the maintenance of the Fire/Public Works
Building from the P.I.R. Fund - the funds that were
transferred to the P.I.R. Fund from the 1978 Fire/Public
Works Building bond issue.
Also, we will get more quotes.
COUNCIL ACTION
"
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'--.J
03/28/91 15:50
.. .
. j~~:\
PAGE 01
. .~;; c.,',~.
. ,0.STRUCTURAL;,
i.RESTORATION ~~;'L~'. 0'
INCORPORATED
811 EAST 54TH STREET
, MINNEAPOLIS. MN 9411
PHONE: (612) 82S-8814 or 824-2-400
. ....~_.:,~~:~
.~ '.~~" ',:~ . -. .
. 'Fet)ruar]f 25, '199:l.'
,:
,v,
city of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
'RE: Pabeon preca.tPanel,Repatrs
. Flr~ $tat!.on.Bul1dlng
C'
. 1'" ..
acoPl O:r waB:' '0'
~ . ,
1. Repair Fabconpanel. on all exterior walls.
..o~;~:. t~\.~~;,,:~~els CQnsist of chips, hOles,:.~o~geS and
,
. .
2. The, rap.tr;.. and materials to be used are app~oved by
Fa~Qon, Inc. Of savage, Minnesota.
,:.oAc01lbinatJ,qn of grouts, cements, and epoxys will be used
'.,: .to make a waterproof and matching repa~r., ,.,,;: .
. ~, . , '.' ,,- . . .
. ..,~ : . ',. ~ . . . ~I ~~.
.3~' ,','1'h.'j~1QJltr"4itpr~~wUl I:oordinate all' worJc,1:,o ~l1oW.-.tation
'~::'r;': o~~.~iC?'" to I:ontinue with no int.en:up1:ion..o.::~~:,'
. ..... . '.. .. . ." , . ....
.:~.~.4.):Ali:ldebri.acCwaulated by this work "ill be rnoYed froll
~tb. .Work area. .,'
, i
I
..... ,,,
Quroprice for tbis,'work is:/,$11,,962pOO.
.:..~ . .. /.
- ,
, CLUJr, :uIAJ:. ,aULDJIG UD...~. I'UCOIf, DUILDDICI
, only)
(Masonry
1. . Bruq sQnd!Jla.t: or water. blast" spot opriJle.anci. 'J?ply, l;me
., .. . : (1) .t.ini~-- Q~t;... of paint ..to . the.!' prev:1cl1,ual~::::J?aJnte4' ,,,, .
", s~t.O'8: Qt .t1.)abuilcUng.,.' , '.. "" ::":.:;,'::"':"-.::~ .',; ..,.
) ~',. ',..~,. ~<',~,,~'\~~:. .'1:'. ~~. '.1'";'0.... ~J . ~ ,"" .-. ':-::~~;':':'~~~~1::~~:" ~ ,\,': /'1-1 ..:..... A' ,j ",,,
, .~ "... Re~1~' caulkJ,.~ ':, around, the ;.:,per~:..teX'. of "~l'~~:~~~dow." ,"',:.1 :'::,' : ,.. ..
. ' .' .doQn,and~'Ri!lD~:::joint,; '. . 0:: '0 '0'" 0~:::~4k,~:0,.;,'., . .,:',;'1':.:":'" ':;, '<' )
:,~<'''''':A'7'' ..'~'~~,~,;,.," .: ::::;..."..>'.;;:{,...!,: ~-. "......, ".> ".. ':.-~~'" l:.~:~.~:\y.}.::.::.~~~t~:~....~.\ ..<',~"~'~- ;;:::.'.,,:t~t~:,.:.Z~)l~
.;i"'~':; ,~':'<o: ~ :!~,CONCRETEREfWRS ., EPOXY~ "':'JUCl<FIP~';." ,,' .... ,:. '1':.><:':>
AHRIiNSCHIMNEYlINERS . STACKREfWRS .WA~FI~' ...... .:;:i~ ,..
INDUSTRIAL FLOOR REPAIRS - PROTECTIVE COATINGS "'"
~:-.~~~~~~..
;' ,';;~~}J::'~. (,..
, .
,:.~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~.~~:.:~~' :~;.~~:':-"
,,~A~', ,:~.;,;~~#::';Jt;f;~.:;;~;-..:':':,,:,'.;
:\';~;:,':~;/ ~":.. .:" .,~:,,~..', ,'" :\'::.~:'~:7
"i-.-.'"
:.:J..... ..~.:~~~t.:.. '. ,',~
-,;",.
. ". ~~,:",~;::~'. :., Y':": .~~.;:~~ : ",
. ''';.''''. <,,:~:
Material to be used:
,--_J
,
,,'
..'~:pric:e.:,.tor this worle i8: · $10,240.00.' ,...
. .
'A. ,"!Timer: DlaJl101\Il VOlJ.lIla8onry- Paint. '..' ..
B.:Top:~oat: Diamond Voqel Ha.OU'Y Paint.
, c.., Colo1:';. . Selected by OWner .
-.. D." CaulltinCJ= sika flex I-A' - ,.
, . ,-
" ~;!,
; ~ :' .
! The above, prices include ': i~r, materials, 0'; equipment, ,
insurance, .. and Bupervisioll . reqq~re4 . to complete -the work
:, ;applyinq standard trade practice. for this'. type of work.
, ,
~:r.. .' .'
Thanlef.ngyou,for'this consideration, w~ remain
~., .-,l .
,I ,'. " '.'
Very truly your.. '.
:~~~. , '.. !
'.
":'.0
S':J,'RtJCTURAL. ,RES~RATION , mc.
.~~~
Terry 'l'hreet.' ..
'l"l'/bt
;, . .~...I
:., ~.;,
. ''':.
'j,
, :i:"
/
/
.-
r'....
. .
.~
~....,
." ,.,
. ::~' '1~'~:" ~
-:".... ....,
'. :::(~';>~', .~~. ;'."
, : :~~
: ..
,:.. "
;. ....,
,.
J
.-,1
'.' ,
~,..., ...,,......... I
nc;:gT T5/8Z/E:'O
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
April 2, 1991
ITEM
NO, 7.
Road Committee
Re or
BY:
Jack McKelvey
B~
"
t. m,
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Road Committee
The Road Committee met on March 20, 1991 to discuss various road
construction projects with the, property owner in the following
areas: Rum River Forest, Lakeridge, Njordmark-Dale, and
University Avenue between 152nd Avenue and newly constructed
Constance Boulevard.
A. Rum River Forest
* Originally surfaced in 1978 with 1 1/2 inches of
bituminous and 4 inches of Class 5.
* Evaluation of the existing streets
- 20% severe deterioration
- 30% moderate cracking
- 50% cracked bituminous pavement
- (other causes) unsuitable soils settling of street due
to which soft clays underly the street section
In discussing the proposed road reconstruction with property
owners, many of the property owners were concerned that the City
has not regularly maintained the existing streets
(sealcoating and cracksealing) as other city streets have been
regularly receiving maintenance. The property owners have agreed
to request the City to begin the process of cracksealing as soon
as this summer (normal cracking, not those that are moderate to
severe cracking such as areas that have alligatored). No
seal coating will be done.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
,-------'
/'0.
\(S/
~_) B. Lakeridge
* Originally surfaced in 1979 with 1 1/2 inches of
bituminous and 4 inches of Class 5.
* Evalution of the existing streets
- 10% severe deterioration
- 25% moderate cracking
- 65% minor cracking
Note: If the streets are not repaired soon, water seeping
into the sub-base will result in additional
deterioration.
Again, this area is very similar to the Rum River Forest area.
Property owners were concerned that the City has not regularly
maintained the existing streets since they were constructed. The
property owners have agreed not to reconstruct the streets and
have requested the city to begin the process of cracksealing as
soon as summer. No sealcoating will be done.
C. Njordmark - Dale
* Evaluation of the existing streets
- 10% severe deterioration
- 50% moderate cracking
- 40% minor cracking
Note: If the streets are not repaired soon, water seeping in
the sub-base will result in additional deterioration.
In discussing the proposed road reconstruction, the property
owners were concerned about the section of gravel street of 178th
Lane NW between Tulip Street and Quay street NW. This is a very
similar situation to 173rd Avenue just east of CSAH 7 where
property owners in the Grow Oak View Estates have blacktop
streets but have to travel gravel streets to get to CSAH 7.
The property owners will be considering reconstructing the street
by sending a petition to property owners including those
individuals west of Quay street NW on 178th Lane NW.
Because the streets are beyond repair, no cracksealing or
sealcoating will be done.
~)
~
XY
:_-) D. University Avenue construction north and south of 157th
Avenue
The Road Committee met with Andover property owners along
University Avenue.
1. The majority of property owners south of 157th Avenue would
like to see that portion of University Avenue constructed.
The City of Ham Lake has had a request from Chuck Cook of
Continental Development Corporation to reconstruct University
Avenue south of 157th Avenue. Andover would assess all
unreimbursable costs that are not eligible through MSA
Funding to Andover property owners.
2. The majority of Andover and Ham Lake property owners north of
157th Avenue have petition against the construction (see
attached petitions). A majority would favor the construction
of blacktop streets with a cul-de-sac at the north end but
state Aid would not participate because University Avenue
would not connect to Constance Boulevard.
Note: The 5 Year MSA Construction Program indicates that
University Avenue north and south of 157th Avenue
could possibly be constructed in 1991. Originally the
City of Andover was interested in constructing
university Avenue south of 157th Avenue and Ham Lake
has been interested in doing north of 157th Avenue.
Total cost of both projects would be shared equally.
,J
1\')1
\:iI
'\
'--)
CITY OF HAM LAKE
155-U CENTRAL AVENUE N.E.
HAM LAKE. MINNESOTA 5530.4
43-4-9555
March. ~8, ~99~
Honorable Mayor and councilmembers
city of Andover
~685 Constance Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers:
It is my understanding that the City of Andover has scheduled
an informational meeting with the Andover Road Committee and
residents to consider the improvement of University Avenue
between ~51st Avenue to the recently constructed Constance
Boulevard. The city of Ham Lake is still very interested in
completing this entire project, as the two cities have
previously agreed, as soon as possible.
,The city of Ham Lake has viewed this project as providing a
good north/south route for residents and emergency vehicles.
We are particularly concerned with the area north of ~57th
Avenue to constance Boulevard. Completion of this section
would allow emergency vehicles to turn west on ~57th Avenue
from Central Avenue which would provide a safer intersection
for access to the north rather tha~ havi~g to ~se the ~cc~~~
at Highway 65 and Constance Blvd. '
Please keep us advised regarding the status
so that we can coordinate the completion of
I
/,
sincerely, / /
wilH"'" A. ;.;}s~
Mayor
of this project
this project.
/'
)
t\::'I
\Q.I
't4-
r
'10
c.C
1:'/1/
9{)~/O
'\
)
CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
12093 lLEX STREET
COON RAPIDS, MN 55433
._~._-----
'..1 '.) ~ II. It:' ,i ~';,': U.... ""1..
~, i. If_ ~ ,. !)_1'.'; ii :
:.1 J; It.. "., ..... . .. '""". ;
i.k1 \\ .-- -'1
r: I --. "". ~ . '090 .
,.," ..'.... I .
J u" '...--". / . l~ I'
DECEMBER 26, 1990
Ci ty of Ham Lake
15544 Central Avenue
Ham Lake, MN 55303
ClTY OF i;~:20\f~R
Re: Paving of University Avenue
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council:
I write this letter to formally express my desire to have
University Avenue paved from 154th Avenue N.E. ( Oak Hill
Estates) south to where the existing asphalt paving
presently ends. Almost every prospective lot buyer for my
project asks when University Avenue will be improved to
154th Avenue.
Following is a formal petition detailing this request:
The undersigned, Continental Development Corporation, fee
owner of certain lots in Oak Hill Estates, Anoka County,
Minnesota, does hereby petition the City of Ham Lake to make
such efforts as are necessary to accomplish the widening and
paving of University Avenue from 154th Avenue N.E. south to
the point where the existing paving presently ends.
Continental Development Corporation requests that the
payment for said improvements be handled consistent with the
methods and policies the City of Ham Lake used to pay the
construction of the already improved portion of University
Avenue located south of 154th Avenue N.E.
Please give this request you consideration.
Feel free to call me if you have any questions, 757-7568.
Respectfully,
/
/
~).~
'j
, J
Charles S. Cook, President
Continental Development Corporation
cc: City of Andover
@
....
90-1/
~.)
PETITION
March 20. 1991
We. the Andove~ residents along University Avenue NW north of
157th Avenue to the cui de sac. do not favor the extension of
University Avenue to the recently constructed Constance Boulevard
at this time. We feel the amount of development and traffic do
not warrant the expense: it is of no benefit to our neighborhood:
and there are other areas ot the City whe~e the MSA tunas are
more urgently needed for the safety and welfare of the City's
residents.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Name/Aadress
D0a91ree
Car-D) ~hV1S~'(\
~,
I (c0'8D LlJtu;~~
~
,J
t\::'I
'=Y
/
i'
1\
-<:
.-,
qu~1l
. )
'---
PETITION
March 20. 19Q1
We. the residents of Ham Lake on Unive~sity Avenue NE north of
157th Avenue to the cui de sac and the 159th cui de sac area.
wish to inform the City of Andover that we do not favor the
extension of University Avenue to the recently constructed
Constance Boulevard at this time. We feel the amount of
development and traffic do not war~ant the expense. and it is of
no benefit to our neighborhood. (Do flof \ (Do wa,,+ .\
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,:\t&lnt rQaJ) _\ _r030...;"lJ .~JD_Htrou~i)'
e
\
:.J
t\::'I
XjJ
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Apr; 1 ? 1 QQl
Administration
APPROV[FOR
AGEttt1A
It
" !
BY: I
I
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Staff, Committee,
'--'--
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.~
Appoint Representative, BY'.
Site Slection Commit-.t-~! '-Trlm~!': F. F:r-h,.",n+-'7
{
The City Council is requested to update the appointment of the
representative to the Anoka County Site Selection Authority.
On January 19, 1990 the Council appointed Jim Elling and Ken
Orttel as the representative and alternate.
The Council should appoint a new representative and alternate.
The Authority, I am told, will meet again in May.
COUNCIL ACTION
,- .....
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'---../
')
'-_/
I
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
April 2, 1991
,~~ ."--"
AGENDA. SE!:]"ION. .
NQ ~t~r, Commlttee, Comm.
ITEM 9.
NO.
Budget Reduction
Plan - Continued
REQUEST
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
Howard D. Koo1ick~
BY: Finance Di rector
/~
I
APPR~~ FOR
AGENDff;
l
BY: /
/
/1
I'
t-""
The Andover City Council is requested to review and amend or
approve the attached plan for,dealing with the known and
anticipated cuts in state aidlpayments. This plan has been
revised based on City council! input received at the March 26th
meeting. Included in this information is a resolution adopting
the budget reduction plan.
BACKGROUND
At the Special City Council meeting on March 26th, the City
Council discussed potential budget cuts to deal with the reduction
in state aid. The following is a list of items that the City
Council discussed:
Department
City Council
Administration
Attorney
Planning & Zoning
Data Processing
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Rescue Service
Protective Inspection
Civil Defense
Streets & Highways
Snow & Ice Removal
Street Signs
Parks & Recreation
MOTION BY
TO
'_;-1
Line Item
Dues
Dues
Charter Commission
Dues
Professional Services
Crime Watch
Salaries
Dues
Dues
Dues
Entire Budget
Rental
See.lcoating
Contacted Services
Dues
Improvements
Summer School
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
Amount
$ 150
1,000
300
500
750
9,000
25,000
3,000
2,000
250
2,400
5,000
10,000
8,000
150
10,000
6,000
$ 83,500
Regular City Council Meeting
April 2, 1990
Adopt Budget Plan Reduction
,)
Since the estimated state aid reduction is $63,748, City Council
requested a recommendation of which items could be cut and the
current status of the items. Below is a discussion of each item.
City
Council - Dues
Estimate for League of Minn. Cities
actual dues will be. Phase I cuts
the amount of the overestimate.
dues is higher than
included $105, which is
Administration - Dues
Current YTD spent is $242. Budgeted amount is $2,515.
$1,000 included in phase I cuts. Cuts include City Clerk not
attending League Conference and other cuts to be determined
by City Administrator.
Attorney - Charter Comm.
Current YTD spent is $0.
amount included in phase
acti vi ty.
Budgeted amount is $300. Entire
I cut based on previous years
Planning & Zoning - Dues
Current YTD spent is $97. Budgeted amount is $870. $300
included in phase II cuts. This cut eliminates a budgeted
training session for six of the commissioners. In past years
this seminar has not be scheduled and they receive a variety
of information from the City Planner on current topics.
Data Processin - Professional Services
Ma~ntenance Agreement on Wor MARC word processing software
was budgeted on this line. Cost would be $750. City has not
had maintenance contract on this software since 1987.
Amount included in phase I cuts.
Police Protection-Crime Watch
Melanie DeLuca and I will be meeting next week to discuss the
status of this program. Costs have been incurred this year,
although it is difficult to estimate an amount, since it is
combined with the Community School program. We will present
a status report to City Council at the second meeting in
April.
Fire Protection - Salaries
Current YTD spent is $6,139. Budgeted amount is $114,700,
although payments to firefighters are made annually in the
fall. Current amount includes only officers and fire
marshall. Prior year history shows spending as follows:
1988 - 47,845.25
1989 - 53,296.17
1990 - 57,464.33
, )
Regular City Council Meeting
April 2, 1990
Adopt Budget Plan Reduction
'\
~_/ Fire Protection - Salaries (Con't)
Projecting the 1990 actual salaries forward into 1991 with a
4% increase plus a 50% increase in the size of the
department, results in the following:
1990 Salaries
4% increase
Subtotal
50% growth in
Department
Total
1991 Budget:
101.42200.101
101.42200.102
Difference
57,464.33
2,298.57
59,762.90
29,881.45
89,644.35
2,500.00
112,200.00
114,700.00
25,055.65
Comparing the fire marshall and other firefighters 1990
salaries to a revised 1991 budget results in the following.
Marshall
Firefighters
& Officers
Totals
1990
Actual
12,425.52
45,038.81
57,464.33
1991
Budget
12,933
76,711
89,644
Fire Protection - Dues
Actual YTD spent is $2,834. Budgeted amount of $7,670.
Based on 1990 activity, 1991 year to date activity,
increasing size of department, and need for continued
training of firefighters for their safety and to decrease
potential City liability, this line was not included in the
budget reduction plan.
Rescue Service - Dues
Actual YTD spent is $216. Budgeted amount is $4,500. Based
on 1988-1990 activity, $2,000 is included as Phase II cut.
Protective Inspection - Dues
Actual YTD spent is $123. Budgeted amount is $500. Reducing
this budget by $250 will result in the City either not being
a member of a building official organization or not being
able to attend meetings for the organization. Since
certification for our building officials includes attending
seminars or conferences, and the low dollar amount,
this item was not included in the budget reduction plan.
~ )
Regular city Council Meeting
April 2, 1990
Adopt Budget Plan Reduction
."J
Civil Defense - Entire Budget
Actual YTD spent is $386 of $2,400 budget. In addition, the
City will be spending an additional $600 on electricity
between now and the end of the year. The year to date spent
includes $275 of repair costs. Based on this data, 1988 and
1989 operating costs of approximately 1,150 each year, and
the known need to replace the batteries at some point in the
future, only the $100 budgeted for dues and registrations was
included as a phase I cut. The remainder of the budget was
not included in the budget reduction plan.
streets and Highways - Rentals
Budgeted amount of $20,800 represents contracted street
sweeping costs. The contract will be awar~at the April 2nd
meeting, and all costs will be incurred during the spring.
Based on previous years and discussions with the Frank stone,
$4,000 has been included as a phase II cut. By the time
phase II cuts will need to be made, the actual amount
budgeted in excess of the contract will be known.
streets and Highways - sealcoatin~
The budgeted amount of $81,3 4 includes $30,000 of
cracksealing and $51,364' of sealcoating. Frank stone has
recommended deleting the seal coat process and adding 41,353
to cracksealing since this does more to extend the life of a
road than sealcoating. The $10,011 difference is split
between phase I and phase II.
Snow and Ice Removal - Contracted Services
Current YTD spent is 'i.J,<ICO out of $11,000 budget. Based on
previous years and anticipation of the City plowing most if
not all of the City streets with our employees and trucks,
$8,000 has been included in phase II cuts.
street Signs - Dues
Budgeted amount of $150 has already been spent. Todd Haas
attended a seminar on signs in February.
Park and Recreation - Improvements
Budgeted improvements include $2,000 for deepening Strootman
Park pond and $10,000 for permanent warming house at
Hawkridge Park. Based on our discussion at the last meeting,
and the input from the Park Board's Darrell DeLarco, it is
understood that these improvements are desired, but not
necessary. Therefore, both these items have been included in
phase II cuts.
,J
~J
.J
Regular City Council Meeting
April 2, 1990
Adopt Budget plan Reduction
Park and Recreation - Summer School
Melanie DeLuca and I will be meeting next week to discuss the
status of this program. Costs have been incurred this year,
although it is difficult to estimate an amount, since it is
combined with the Community School program. We will present
a status report to City Council at the second meeting in
April.
Since the General Fund Budget was adopted by resolution, adoption
of the plan amending the budget must also be by resolution.
The resolution will include a copy of the Budget Reduction Plan.
CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS
1. Approve the Budget Reduction Plan as presented and adopt the
enclosed resolution.
2. Amend the Budget Reduction Plan and adopt the enclosed
resolution.
3. Amend the Budget Reduction Plan and request additional
research be done by the Finance Director on specific items.
4. Table this item pending further information.
5. Other options as City Council may deem necessary.
'\
-)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -91
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1991 GENERAL FUND BUDGET AND ADOPTING
THE CITY OF ANDOVER BUDGET REDUCTION PLAN.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Andover adopted
resolution number R174-90 establishing the 1991 General Fund
budget; and
WHEREAS, the budget anticipated revenue from the State of
Minnesota in the form of Local Government Aid totaling $102,829;
and
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has enacted into law a
budget reconciliation package which includes reductions in Local
Government Aid payments to cities; and
WHEREAS, the City of Andover has been notified that its
Local Government Aid will be reduced by $31,874; and
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has warned cities that an
additional reduction in local government aid is likely to be
approved and that the amount of this reduction will be equal to
the previously approved amount.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Andover hereby adopts the attached Budget Reduction Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the 1991 General Fund budget is
amended to include all phase I expenditure cuts as outlined in the
Budget Reduction Plan and revenue from Local Government Aid is
hereby decreased by $31,874.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 2nd
day of April , 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
ATTEST:
,_~ Victoria Volk, City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
~J
BUDGET REDUCTION PLAN
PURPOSE
The City of Andover has established this plan to reduce the
General Fund 1991 budget in response to the known and anticipated
reductions in state aids.
EXTENT OF STATE AID REDUCTIONS
As of the date of adoption of this plan, the State Legislature
enacted into law aid reductions for the City of Andover totaling
$31,874. In addition, there is the potential for a second aid
reduction of an equal amount.
EXPENDITURE CUTS
Phase I - Phase I cuts will be made upon adoption of this plan to
deal with the known amount of aid reductions. The Phase I
expenditure cuts are as follow&:
Department
City Council 41110
Amount
$ 105
Data Processing
41920
$ 750
Unallocated 49200
$ 1,42"
Attorney - Charter
Commission 41616
$ 300
Administration
41430
$ 1,000
j
/
Civil Defense
41430
100
$
Justification
Reduction of estimate of League
of Minnesota Cities dues based
on discussion with LMC.
Elimination of maintenance
agreement on WordMarc word
processing software.
Reduction of amount due to MWCC
for 1972 Deferrment. 1991 is
the final payment year and,
hence the annual payment is
less than prior years.
Elimination of budget for
attorney costs relating to
charter commission based prior
two years actual expenditures.
Elimination of seminars as
follows:
City Clerk attendance at
annual League of MN Cities
conference
Other conferences as decided
by City Administrator
Elimination of budgeted
conference
Phase I - Continued
" '\
I
'-_/
Department
Amount
Justification
Reduction of estimated salaries
for volunteers based on
previous years after allowing
for 50% growth of department
1990 Salaries:
101.42200.101
101.42200.102
Elimination of sealcoating
program and replacement with
increased cracksealing.
Fire Protection
42200
$ 25,055
4% increase
Subtotal
50% growth in
Department
Total
1991 Budget:
101.42200.101
101.42200.102
Difference
Marshall
Firefighters
& Officers
Totals
Streets & Highways
$ 3,137
Total Phase I
$ 31,874
========
14,437.33
43,027.00
57,464.33
2,298.57
59,762.90
29,881. 45
89,644.35
2,500.00
112,200.00
114,700.00
25,055.65
1990
Actual
12,425.52
45,038.81
57,464.33
1991
Budget
12,933
76,711
89,644
phase II - Phase II cuts will be made, if necessary, after the
State Legislature has enacted law establishing the amount of any
further state aid reductions. The actual amounts of the
expenditure cuts will be approved by the City Council once the
amount to be cut is known. The Phase II expenditure cuts listed
below represent the intentions of the City of Andover if, and when
such cuts are necessary. Since the timing of these cuts is not
known, the City has identified an amount greater than the.
anticipated cut to allow flexibility.
j
\ Phase II - Continued
'--)
/ "
'....._/
Department
Planning and Zoning
41910
Rescue Service
42270
Park and Recreation
45200
Park and Recreation
45200
Streets & Highways
43100
streets & Highways
43100
Snow & Ice Removal
43125
Total phase II
Amount
$ 300
$ 2,000
$ 2,000
$ 10,000
$ 6,874
$ 4,000
$ 8,000
$ 33,174
--------
--------
Justification
Elimination of training session
for six Planning and Zoning
Commissioners.
Reduction of estimated needs
for conferences, dues and
seminars for rescue squad.
Elimination of deepening of
Strootman Park Pond.
Elimination of construction
of permanent warming house
at Hawkridge park.
Elimination of seal coating
program and replacement with
increased cracksealing.
Elimination of a portion of
contractual street sweeping or
overestimate of contract cost.
Contract will be awarded in
early spring.
Elimination of contracted
plowing. All plowing will be
done by City trucks and
employees.
~ '\
,-.J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
ITEM
NO. Receive Feasibility
It). Re ort 91-2
BY:
11~
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING
Engineering
The City Council is requested to approve the attached resolution
accepting feasibility study, waiving public hearing, ordering
improvement and directing preparation of plans and specifications
for the improvement of Project 91-2 for sanitary sewer, watermain,
streets and storm drain in the following area: Creekview Crossing
(Phase II of Old Colony Estates).
A copy of the feasibility report is in your packet.
MOTION BY
. '\
\..J TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
~
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING,
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT 91-2 FOR
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STREETS, AND STORM DRAIN IN THE
FOLLOWING AREA CREEKVIEW CROSSING
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 19th day of March
19 91 , order the preparation of a feasibility study for the
improvements; and
WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by
presented to the Council on the 2nd day of April
TKDA and
, 19~; and
WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a Public
Hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and
declares the improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of
$ 895,300.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby receive the feasibility report with an estimated
total cost of improvements of $ 895,300.00 , waive the Public
Hearing and order improvements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the
firm of TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such
improvement project.
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED by the City
require the developer to escrow the sum of $
payments to be made prior to commencement of
specifications.
Council to hereby
35,000.00 with
work on the plans
such
and
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
day of
City Council at a
Meeting this
19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
,
)
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
, '\
,_J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE l\r..; 1 ", 1 ~~l
ITEM
NO. I
I .
Approve Installation
of Signs/Barnes
Rollin Oaks
Engineering
~
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution which
allows the speed to be reduced in Barnes Rolling Oaks 2nd
Addition. Attached is the authorization from the Minnesota
Department of Transportation.
This item was tabled from a regular scheduled City Council Meeting
on April 9, 1990 due to lack of funds in the sign budget.
The approximate costs for posts and signs is $1100. This does not
include the City's labor costs.
The $1100 includes stop signs, speed signs, advanced warning signs
with advisory speed plates and dead end signs. If the 35 mph
speed limit is approved, signs are required to be instal~ed and
shall be in accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices 1986.
The 1991 sign budget of $8000 is available. A portion of this
budget is to be used for damaged or faded signs and a portion for
new signs in existing developments.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
, '\
'J TO
SECOND BY
'\
'..../
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 35 MPH SPEED LIMIT IN THE BARNES ROLLING
OAKS 2ND ADDITION IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
WHEREAS, 35 mph speed limit signs are to be posted in streets
in Barnes Rolling Oaks 2nd Addition.
WHEREAS, MNDOT has given authorization to lower the speed
limit to 35 mph.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that 35 mph speed limit be
posted in the Barnes Rolling Oaks 2nd Addition area contingent
upon posting appropriate advance curve or warning signs,
including appropriate speed advisory plates.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of
, 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - city Clerk
\
.~I
~ ,~,,,4vI-
.:~:.4f
, '\
'--)
;~e9lJ!::.r- Ci~y C;.Juncil l-ieetirl9
Apc~I 3. 1990 - Minutes
?a<;e 7
~???O~l':: S~::~D STt.JD.'l".~t.!,;'t.l~~ RiDGE:. COUNT?":/VI_2~," :=:SI,;T::S. \l~?Drn ~C~:=.:S
MOT!O~J by Orttel ~ Seccn~ed by Per~y~ that we defe~ l~stallaticn of
speed signs in Hawk Ridge! Countcyvlew Estates~ and Ve~din Ac~es until
such time as the sign budget allows toe installation. Mo~i=n ca~ried
~i1'=.n imous 1 y.
I
!
~??ROV2 S?E~D STUDY/U~JIV2RSITY ~VENUS
~':c;TIC~[ 8::': :<:nic;ht. Sec~i"icec by J2.=:':=50:1. tc: c:- :7:cve. ~'!8:1G:1 ::==.=-:-Le~
~.!n.::.:;l:7:c~sl'/ .
It,'I??ROIlE
~o-::'~n
,.....- ..........-,
STUuY/B,;R~IES
2ND ~ADDITION:!
MOTICN by r~lght. Secon~ed by ?erry. to de~er the placIng c~ slg~s
in this subdivisio~ until such time as the si=~ budge: allows ~O~
Ins~~l ia~icn. M~tion cac~ied ~nanlmously.
,~UT::C?:Z.~~IG~I ?O:=: ~,IJ.;l.R~'fING ~N0 ,~Dt.l~SC~':! S?~::J SiGNS/:57~:-: ~\}:: :~ ~<::::;~.:-:
~!OTICN by Jacc~scn~ Secon~ed by ?e~~y! authc~izing ~he ~a~ning and
a~viscry speed sIgns en 158th Avenue and Xenia acea. move that we
detec ~ny ins~a!laticn of si~ns until aiter the first c= the ye~c.
Moticn carried unanimously.
AUTHORIZ.;TION ?OR INST,J;U,;TION 0: STR:::ET SIGNS/STENQUIST ;'[)]:;::':01'j
r'10TION by Knight. Seconded by PeC"C"y, the same as the pr-evicL:s
motion. DISCUSSION: Mr. Haas stated they may be able to sign that
area within the budget by: moving some other signs around. Council
asked him to come back with another reco~mendation and revised cost
fh;lures. r10tion carried unanimously.
ANDOVER ;THLETIC ASSOCIATION STORAGE BUILD!NG
Mayor Elling ex~lained th~Andover Athletic Asociaticn has pco?osed to
construct a storage shed on the park grcuncs in the City Hall Complex.
contributing it to the City and leasing it back for the storage of
their equipment. Presently their equipment is being s~cred in the
Publ ic Works storage building. Attorney HaYkins advised the proposal
is legal. When it is leased. the AAA would have control avec the
building and would be liable for its conten~s.
"
~ _/ Roce~ Sha~cn. Anccve~ Mthletic Asscci=tion - statec the builcing
r..;cu'ld be 24 ^ 24 :eet~ blcck 'i..;ith stucco C~ the cutsice. ~.;ccd tr-usses
with no ~lin~ows. He also noted they have [~su~ance on all 0: :heic
equi;:ment.
. ,
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
,p(~\
I If
v.",~
Mn/DOT 29213 (12-78)
Page~of---LPages
~
LOCAL STRE::T OR HIGHWAY SPEED LIMIT AUTHORIZATION
;;'oad Authority City of Andover IDate March 12, 1990
Road Name or No. Described below
Termini of Zone: From
To I Date of Request
October 17, 1989
Kindly make the following changes in speed limits on the above-referenced section. Changes authorized herein are in
accordance with Minnesota Highway Traffic Regulation Act. M.S. Chapter 169.14 and applicable subdivisions thereof.
146th Lane N.W.
35 miles per hour between the intersection with Sycamore Street N.W. and the
intersection with Prairie Road N.W.
Sycamore Street N.W.
35 miles per hour between the intersection with 146th Lane N.W. and the
intersection with 148th Lane N.W.
148th Lane N.W.
35 miles per hour between the intersection with Sycamore Street N.W. and the
intersection with Prairie Road.
Palm Street, N.W.
35 miles per hour between the intersection with Andover Boulevard and a point
approximatly 365 feet north of the intersection with 148th Lane N.W. (the
north end of Palm Street).
NOTE:
The above speed limits are authorized contingent upon curves and hazards being
signed with the appropriate advance curve or warning signs, including
appropriate speed advisory plates. The roadway described above shall be
reviewed for traffic control devices impacted by the authorized speed limits
before posting the signs. Warning, signs and speed limit signs shall be in
accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 1986.
/
Please
Sign _
Here
Signature of Traffic Engineer
,
(3) White - Road Authority
(1) Pink - Central Office Traffic
(l) Blue - District Traffic Engineer
, ,./' '~oad Authority use only
Dale traffic control devices changed implementing this authorization
I Month.Day.Year
I Signature
I Title
r,
, "-)
/ '\
-....J
-'7--
J
.I. w\~l'lESOI:t
'i~ ~~
;; >-
:::I ;:
.... :::
~ 0
'1, 4-
~ OF T"'p..~
~, ~-
e.;'-.- ---
.. ~.(~ %...,/.
/J.Jd '+I'~A/
-,
Minnesota Department ot Transportation
iransportation Building,
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-1154
March 12, 1990
Ms. Vicki Volk
Andover City Clerk
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NY
-,- Andover, ~innesota 55304
Dear ~s. Volk:
As requested by City Resolution, dated October' 17, 1989, attached is
authorization to erect the appropriate signs designating the reasonable and
safe speeds on the described streets in Barnes Rolling Oaks Addition.
Please keep these authorizations in your permanent files, we have our
necessary copies. Erection of signs shall be in conformance with 1986
Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Contra1 Devices.
Note the contingencies on the authorizations. These must be met before the
regulatory speed limit signs are erected or changed.
Sincerely"
f
/2.;1. )('v / t" v-
R. A. Kurpl.uS
Asst. Traffic Engineer, Standards
cc: Todd Haas - Assistant City Engineer
(Transmittal Only)
/
-
I
,.an Equal OppurtUlllf." Emplt'yrr
;,. -I
, 'II --'~I . .! I .ll I ! i --'':.:.:. \Ji *"'......
I I,,;; II ..;. i I I ' ~
! 111:i !;, II '.: ..."'......
I i ',.--------:11, 1 'aAX!"':"', i ,
, I Ir~11 Lj. ~t,-I I . ~L ~I' ...........
I 11f--: 1'1 I II r ~ I ' '7-' ~( ii ___
---'- I I I \>;?fl;S~,., Ii f=i III' ;: .:! ~I
I > 1--0 I sme,.;. I LL-
I -- ,i~?-\. '0.-1- ; . : \!'~ II 07:_;'
I I ............\ II-J- t:t$D~~ . 1-=
----+----IT- - Iii;:""", 1-~ 0---- i: ~---
'~ ! ^) ('j,,",. : 'I I ;---
'~Y\ , '\ ~ ! V ! ~~~_..
, ' : '''-. i II i ~l I I I ~~ ~. _..
i .~ II . I / I, ~_'
SIT .we. IN'
~ I" '+.!IIII~r
., I.. I ". I
~ "";.; I ~ . ~:Jl<S'-i..J . _, I ;! __..
=~~, I' ~~~"
;:~., . 'In li:J ^." ;. v:-~~ - I ~ ...,.......
~~.. :-;~ I' \ \ I . ~ I ~
-,...",.,,,. 'J~/,'/.;; . I H'K' "1' f"J.'Z' '. \ I ---:-. I i:
~'''''.~ "I",.,.! ~~,' ~I' '\ I I r. ...".......
~ .,:.:;.;;~.': ..~..\. :\, ;' . 'I . ,I : 8ARNE~:: fT'~W.1 WG i --'r--.... I .. I
'~, ...;' - '':\'. I ~ ~ ~~. ~A~"-: I --;,__ ~-:-
~'~'~"., ' . . rlAKw-&.,IY/-; \ ',,"" : __ _ __~__~ _...._
::::::,;,~.~:f -- .~.I --I'+-'--"'I-~-I"-::j~ 'I:':'; .1/,1:,1.1.,. _
~inrr&:st. i 1, ' . . .# . I ~ARN'cS ROLLING f-./ i'.. _ .... _
~'-~.~ I I ' I . I I '~I I vj'I'I:~K.I: I.' I. ~i.
= c: I ./..( I~ :' I I I.' ! . ': '. II ___
l ~: : i+l; ""o..~. I I ;'\.1 _ I JV I : 'jJ I. '--
! ',91:,,), I ~ I "t~ C:j/ If- ~ AUD ',',-./0 :"J --..
I ~~-;j~ I I ~ I I.
II · 'i'''-', =ul,c I,~I!'O
' ,~, I I I ....... --4-. ----t--r~ --J-- _.....
: ...-~'" H.- t. - --- "'- I I l"
I - v T--- ~ ,-- ) !f -- _J/ NO. ,.
~ I II YB'/) .
I ir-.. I I), l
. I ~ !_--.. n-!./' ~I I 1.//1: I
L A~~:~I I --I' ,7/ I
~~"~ ,~.~~~'::~~[' r. 71 I
" '/oI.,-o:.~":F' ~ ........ ~ I
I~. J'-: ,',." ...;..:"'...,.. ,..' .
· '([j~ t<?'I~. ~.<. ~~?',( ;:;;0; , .,.':'1: .J. __
. ,. . .. ~h I ----- J
'. ',. ~II" ,0:, I
~.~;;o;;~ :": ~.._.._,4~~ :/. I A.,-=-....
\f/.r~"~:~ ..:' :'.. . :~"" =, ! ~~\~ I
. ...... . ~.,. ~~. ,'-e!\ ~~~...~__) ))'.i~.", _,~I l -..;::....... _..
..... t' 11l.L-11.. .--"'. II', .r,.._ ,.,....~--,.jj OIIAIV~OI . .,.~
- v;..'.,..,.... .. .,.,... ",. IJVIYr'J;;.IT~/r.,J"""- "'"...........:....;;.. ~'''''....)'. .
_.;~.- ., .,=.;",""C;' -/ "'~_"~~~'i'~ LA~KE~',:~,,,,,~'j~~~>:,,~~~
"~~C7, ,;;f;<""- . ;:..:t.- '::";:;::':.-::=':';".'''' ~-~~i ~,~ amo _ _
:i;;- ~'~?;_ ~ '" ~__~_::'-I :,~~_.;~-;..y
~.... .
, I
I
!
,
'- )
I DaN ~ lflii
---
< ---
-~
...... .... ..
----
- ... ..
r--
--..
C/---.-~-,
2...... ~+,''''''
Regular City Council .Meetlng
Minutes - Octcbe" :7. 1989
Page 11
-
:~
ACCEP'!" STREETS/t.UND'S 51'~ ~DDITrON
MaTTON by O~ttel. Seconded by Xnlght. a Resolution app"ovlng the
final grading for street construction of Lund's Eve"green Estates 5th
Addition as being developed by James Lund In Section 9 32 24. noting
the seeding and g"adlng is on the public ~Ight of way. (See Resolution
R177-89) Motion car"led unanimously.
SPEED STUDY DISCUSSION/HAWK R!DGE AREA
Mr. Haas reviewed the MnDot speed study fo~ the Hawk Ridge area.
Attorney Hawkins noted the a~ea does not necessa~ily have to be
posted, as the State Statu.te is the u"ban speed' limit is 3'0 mph.
Staff also noted it 'is very costly to put In all the signs, and It Is
not a budgeted item. Mr. Schcantz stated they have been postIng 30
mph signs at the ent~ances of developments off the main "oads. It was
then! ag~eed to put a stop sign on 1 79th" and speed signs on the ma i n
collector roads going into the development. --
MOTION by O~ttel, Seconded by Jacobson. that the Council authorize
the installation of speed limit signs as al lowed by MnDot at the
ent~ances of the following developments: Hawk Ridge. Count~yvlew
Estates. and Ve~din Ac~es. as well as the InstallatIon of a stop sign
.on 179th Avenue In Hawk RIdge as allowed by the State of MInnesota.
"and that the Council authorize the City Staff to request a speed
traffic study for Ba~nes Roiling Oaks Second Addition; with the signs
to be Installed afte~ the first of the yea~. MotIon carried
.unan imous I y .
".
MARIAN HEIDELBERGER VARIANCE
Atto~ney Hawkins explained the Judge has 'agreed the Heidelberger
garage is a violation of the ordinance but he would not put Mrs.
Heidelberger In Jail for it nor order It to betaken down. If the
City wishes to pursue it further. it can take a civIl action against
Mrs. Heidelberger to have a cou~t issue an injunction to take down the
structure. It is a longer'and more expensive process.
Council expressed disappointment and frustration over the ruling but
took no further action at this time.
APQROVAt OF CLAIMS
.',
I
MOTION by Orttel, Seconded b~Per~y. that we approve ClaIms 17409
through 17499 for a total dollar amount of s358,795.72. Motion
carried unanImously.
MOTION by Jacobson. Seconded by Knight, to adjourn. MotIon carried
unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 11:02. p.m.
, ) 't\.~esp~ctfullY SW"m~ ~
,~ '''' a.,... ~ t:'l. Li:::' F~
M~la A. Peacn. RecordIng ccetary
,-J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE :april 2,1991
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ITEM
NO.
1:1..
90-3/90-16 Assessments
Declare Costs, Waive
P.H
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineedng /51
,A,,~~~,,~O Vj,fJ R
A'::{ ~~
The City Council is requested to approve the three resolutions
1) Declaring the cost and directing the preparation of an
assessment roll, 2) Hearing on proposed assessment, and
3) Resolution adopting the assessment roll for Projects 90-3 &
90-16, Kensington Estates 5th and 6th Additions.
The developer has requested that the Council waive the public
hearing and has waived the right to appeal.
The assessments are 10 years at 8.5% interest.
Attached: Letter from Jerry Windschitl
3 Resolutions
TKDA Letter on Cost Breakdown
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
, 'I
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
'\
~ MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN
AND STREETS , FOR PROJECT NO. 90-3 & 90-16, KENSINGTON ESTATES 5TH
AND 6TH ADDITIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$220,553.80, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $ 77,612.29 and work previously done
amount to $ 70,822.07 so that the total cost of the improvement will
be $ 368,988.16 \
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of su~h improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ 21,085.43 and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $ 347, 902 . 73
2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January 1992, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 8.5 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
meeting this
day of
,19_
with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
" "
"'-/
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
,j
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN & STREETS
PROJECT NO. 90-3 & 90-16, KENSINGTON ESTATES 5TH AND 6TH ADDITION
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given to the developer,
the developer has waived the assessment hearing and the right to
appeal, the council has not heard any objections to the proposed
assessment for the improvements.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the
installments to be payable per the Development Contract and shall bear
interest at a rate of 8.5 percent per annum from the date of
the adoption of this assessment resolution.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
City Council at a
meeting this
day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the
resolution, and Councilmen
voting against,
whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
'- )
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
'~MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND STREETS FOR PROJECT NO. 90-3
AND 90-16, KENSINGTON ESTATES 5TH AND 6TH ADDITIONS
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on April 2
19 91 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment
cost of improvements for Project No. 90-3 & 90-16 ; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public
inspection; and
,
of the
WHEREAS, the Developer has waived the public hearing and waived his
right to appeal.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN:
1. The public hearing is hereby waived as requested by the Developer.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19_
voting
with Councilmen
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
)
,
)
'-)
March 28, 1991
Mr. James Schrantz
city of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Mr. Schrantz,
We wish to waive our right to a public hearing and our right to
appeal the assessments for the City of Andover Improvement
Project 90-3 and 90-16, which relates to Kensington Estates,
5th and 6th Additions.
0,"
Our waiver is based upon a final assessment of $ ~/co.~
per lot and that the City in the near future would pay us back
interest on the moneys already paid off on the project using
the same rate of interest we were charged in the assessment
role.*
*Note: The City assessment role was calculated as if we
had not paid any of the assessments off, when in
fact a large portion of these lots have already
been paid off.
Sincerely,
)~.Jtv.' ~
tAv-t aJ~Ci
Jerry Windschitl
Carol Windschitl
.I
Jl~~Jr.~~M.!lNT RnTJTJ C.1~~nt~TIONS
'\
,_ ...J Kensington 5th and 6th Additions
City Projeots 90-3, 90.16
Andover, Minneso~a
COll'mJ.ssion No. 9695
t..t..~aJ. lS.n.!!.t.
1. Sat1.it.~ 8""2::
73,999.45 x 1.3~39314 - $100,054.79
Civided by 49 Lots - " 2,041.93
Ceduot City Participation x .93207 $ 1,903.21
2. Mate:=aLn
48,477.70 x 1.3539314 " 65,635.48
Divided by 49 I.ootll - ., 1,339.50
K .93207 $ 1,241.50
3. 8to:= S..,.2:
32,045.96 x 1.3539314 $ 43,389.03
Oivided by 49 Lots $ 885.47
:H: .93207 $ 825.32
4. stor..t.
65,142.41 x 1.3539314 $ 89,198.35
Divided by 49 Lots ., 1,799.97
x .93207 $ 1, 677. ISI
5. Matel: C:onnect:lcm
51,695.00/49 $ 1,055.00
6. Sanitary Sewer Conneotion
11,977.07/49 , . 2U.43
i
i
7. StOJ;1ft S.,..2: AJ:e. I
/
.:;- /
7,150.00/49 a U~.D1
TOTAI. UNJ:T $ 7,100.06
8.5' Interest
10 Yearsl Equal Payment
I April 2, 1991 Hearing Date
./
v'd
'JOSS~ ~ '~'a'~'l LS:Z, ,6, 82 O~W
("
~TKDA
TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 551 01.'8D3
8121292-4400
FAX 8121292-COB3
March 14, 1991
,.:..... E'-'r-',,-r-rift 'fI
If" ~ ~.~ 5'" :
~ _U_ - '-~--,:" 1
1 >l.\ ',"'- 1 (31('Oll,U
n f~ "/" ~. -'.
,;1 \;i .....V< (,~,- I""
- /~-
Mr. James Schrantz
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW
Puldover,11llU1esota 55304
Re: Kensington Estates 5th and 6th Additions
(90-3) (90-16)
Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 9695
CITY OF Ai'!DOVEP
Dear Mr. Schrantz:
The following is a revised list of costs on the above referenced project to be paid by the City of
Andover. Please replace the letter of 3-11-91.
The items listed under Section 5, Red Oaks Addition Utilities, have been added to the list from
the ietter dated on February 5,1991. 'llIe storm sewer area charge is amended for the 18.7 acres.
1. Nightingale Street NW
Street construction, storm sewer and restoration was performed beyond the Kensington
Estates 5th Addition plat. The following is the list of quantities that were required to
perform tlus work along with tlieir unit prices. ,',' '
Description O~lantity O' Amount
. nee
Surmountable Curb 250.0 LF $4.50 $1,125.00
Oass 5 Gravel 93.6 TN .6.12 572.83
Subgrade Preparation 1.25 RS 82.40 103.00
Bituminous Wear Course 52.21N 14.62 763.16
AC Bituminous Material 2.87 TN 131.84 378.38
Shallow Catch Basins 2.0 EA 700.00 1,400.00
12" RCP Storm Sewer Pipe 38.0 LF 14.00 532.00
15" RCP Stonn Sewer Pipe 28.0 LF 15.00 420.00
12" RC Flared End Section 1.0 EA 450.00 450.00
Seed 13.0 LB 3.00 39.00
Roadside Seeding 0.35 AC 600.00 210.00
\ Topsoil (Change Order No.4) 140.0 CY 7.00 980.00
'J
Total City Construction Cost for Nightingale Street $6,973.37
~
Mr. James Schrantz
March 14, 1991
Page Two
~J
2. Raven Street NW and Red Oaks West Park Driveway
Street construction and restoration was performed beyond the Kensington Estates 5th
Addition plat on tltis street. The following is the list of quantities that were required to
perform this work along with their unit prices.
Description
Ouantity
Price
Amount
Surmountable Curb
RemovelDispose Existing Bituminous
Bituminous Wenr Course
AC Bituminous Material.
95.0 LF
148.0 SY
32.6 TN
1.79 TN
$4.50
0.50
14.62
131.84
$427.50
74.00
476.61
235.99
21.28
Sodding (Change Order No.4)
Glade Boulevard at 14085 Raven Street
(Change Order No. 4)
Pave 100' x 14' Driveway to Red Oaks
West Park (Change Order No.4)
346.95
627.93
Total City Construction Cost for Raven Street and
Red Oak West Park Driveway
$2,210.26
3. Street Grade Change on 141st Avenue NW (See Change Order NO.4)
TIle street grade on 141st Avenue from Station 9+00 to Station 13+16 was raised. The
street grade change was required because a house was built at an incorrect elevation.
The person responsible for the house being built at the incorrect elevation should be
backcharged for this expense.
$947.03
4. Remove/Replace Damaged Curb ~ Intersection Quinn Street NW/141st Lane NW
$218.50
5. Red Oak Addition Utilities
Description Ouantity Price Amount
MJ Fittings 220.0 LB $0.90 $ 198.00
6" DIP Class 50 Watermain 7.0LF 7.00 49.00
8" DIP Class 50 Watennain 40.0 LF 8.30 332.00
Hydrant 1.0EA 1,000.00 1,000.00
..... 12" Hydrant Extension 1.0 LF 225.00 225.00
I 8" PVC SDR 26 SS 0-10' 148.0 LF 10.00 1,480.00
'~
4' Diameter Manhole 1.0EA 950.00 950.00
Remove/Salvage 18" PES 1.0 LS 400.00 400.00
Tnt,,1 $4.634.00
Remove and replace damaged existing curb in the northwest radius, at the intersection of
Quinn Street NW lU1l114lst Lane NW (Olange Order No.4).
(
Mr. James Schrantz
March 14, 1991
Page lbree
- )
'--
Total City Construction Costs for This Project is:
$6,973.37
2,210.26
947.03
218.50
$4.634.00
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
$14,983.16
5.303.49
$20,286.65
Construction
Expenses
Total
The total City Project Costs include construction costs and expenses. The City's share of the
total expense will be the city's percentage of the construction costs multiplied by the total
expenses for the project.
$5,303.49
78,060.91 =
City's Expense = 14.983.15
220,533.80
x
Total City Project Costs:
(Construction Costs)
(Expenses)
14,983.16
5.303.49
$20,286.65
Total
At our meeting with Mr. Windschitl on March 6, 1991, we agreed to change the stonn
sewer area charge from $0.04 per square foot to the cost of constructing the outlet for the
Red Oaks Pond. TIle cost of the Red Oaks Pond Outlet was calculated in the Kensington
Estates TIIird Addition Feasibility Report (Feb~ary 1988).
The construction cost in the Feasibility Report ($18,690) was converted to present day
cost by using the Engineering News Record Cost Index:
$18,69{} x fl1J.. =
4460
$5,500.00
27.5% x
Construction Cost = $5,500.00
Expenses = $5,500.00 x 30% =
$1.650.00
$7,150.00
"
'-)
TOTAL
(
Mr. James Schrantz
March 14, 1991
Page Four
, "
'--./'
Storm Sewer Area Olarge:
18.7 Acres @ $382.35/Acre
$7,150.00
Please contact me if you have any questions.
JLD:j
cc: Mr. Jerry Windschitl
, \
'j