Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC February 19, 1991 DATE: February 19, 1991 , \,J ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL special City Council Meeting Minutes - 1/29/91 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - 2/5/91 Andover Housing & Redevelopment Authority Minutes - 2/5/91 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes - 2/7/91 Andover Fire Dept. Business Meeting Minutes - 12/26/90 Memo re: Newsletter from Karen Tommerdahl - 2/14/91 preliminary plat - Andover West Letter from Dale J. Trippler, MPCA - 2/12/91 Letter from Margaret A. coughlin re: WDE - 2/8/91 Agenda & Minutes from Coon Creek Watershed District Letter from John Davidson, TKDA - 2/6/91 PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEX1 AGENDA. THANK YOU. / ) . '\ 'J AGENDA COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS February 11. 1991 7:30 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Open Mike POLICY ITEMS 4. Approval of Minutes 5. Receive Monthly Financial Statements 6. Approve Bills PERMIT ITEMS 7. Approve Woodham North PUD (PAN 91-0~) 8. Renew Nordeen Mining Permit (Permit ~409) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 9. Receive Staff Report NEW BUSINESS. ADJOURN "10 cc., . 11ft /1/ DRAFT J COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS' MEETING January 28, 1990 The Board of Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed Distr,ct held their re'Jular meeting on January 28, 1990 at the Bunker H,lls Activitl~S Center. Present: Bob Boyum, Reggie Hemmes, Eldon Hentges, LuEllen Richmond. Paul Williams. Staff : Tim Kelly, Ed Mathiesen, Harold Sheff 1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 PM 2. Approval of the Agenda: Moved by Richmond, seconded by Williams. Motion carried with four yeas (Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and williams) and no nays. 3. Open Mike: No one was present 4. APproval of January 14, 1991 Minutes: Moved by Richmond, seconded by Williams. four yeas (Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Motion carried with Williams) and no nays. Permit Items 5 Larson 1st Addition (PAN 91-02): Mathiesen reviewed the permit application. Staff recommended approval with the provision a construction schedule, detailed erosion control plan, and erosion control escrow of $3,305 are received. Recommendation was moved by Richmond, seconded by Williams. Motion carried with four yeas (Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays. Boyum arrived. 6 Woodham North P.U.D. (PAN 91-01): Mathiesen reviewed the permit application. Staff recommended tabling until a construction schedule, detailed erosion control plan are received. Hentges raised concern about the recommendation for a holding tank. Staff was directed to review on-site septic system requirements with the city of Ham Lake. recommendation to table was moved by Boyum, seconded by Williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, an~ Williams) and no nays. Policy Items i Public Hearing on Maintenance Project 91-01: Hemmes opened the hearing. Hemmes asked the record to show that no one was in attendance. Boyum moved tO,close the hearing. Seconded by Richmond. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays. 8 Approval and Order of Maintenance Project 91-01: Boyum moved the following resolution. Seconded by williams. ,J Page 1 Pa~~ ~ COO" Cree~ W~t~rshed Djstrlct - January 28, 199t ~~ RESOLUTION 91-04 DRAFT ORDERING MAINTENANCE OF COON CREEK BETWEEN HANSON BOULEVARD AND CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD IN ANDOVER, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, The Coon Cree~ Watershed District is established under M.nnesota Statutes 112 tv protect the pUblic health and welfare by managing the water and related land resources of Coon Creek, and WHEREAS, To fulfi 11 this purpose the Watershed District must ma.ntaln Coon creek by removing obstructions which can cause flooding, and WHEREAS, The Waste Disposal Engineering landf,ll, a federal superfund site, is adjacent to Coon Creek, and the legal boundaries governed by the United State Environmental Protection ~gency and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency include the bed and banks of Coon creek, and WHEREAS, The United State Environmental Protection Agency, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and the responsible parties are proposing to implement a closure, containment and water Quality monitoring program in the spring of 1991, and WHEREAS, Coon creek at Crosstown Boulevard drains approximately 55 square miles and serves as the stormwater outlet for the city of Ham Lake and a portion of the city of Andover, and WHEREAS, This portion of Coon creek has not been maintained in several years and has a number of trees that have fallen into the creek, and WHEREAS, This portion of the creek was inspected by the District Engineer and members of the Board of Managers in July, 1990, and WHEREAS, The City of Andover is supportive of maintaining this portion of the creek and has agreed to cooperate on a maintenance project, and WHEREAS, The Board of Managers has noticed the public and adjacent land owners and subsequently conducted a public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, The Coon Creek Watershed District Board of Managers finds that it is in the common benefit of every one in the Distrfct to perform maintenance of Coon Creek between Hanson Boulevard and Crosstown Boulevard in Andover; ,and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Coon Creek Watershed District Board of Managers hereby orders and directs the removal of all treos and other obstructions from Coon creek between Hanson Boulevard and Crosstown Boulevard in Andover that might impair or impede the flow of water. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and will iams) and no nays./I 9 Policy 2.3: Expenditur~ Controls: Adoption of the policy was moved by Boyum, seconded by Hentges. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and williams) and no nays. , , J --~ 10 Approve membership in MAWD Metro Chapter: Hemmes and Kelly reviewed the activities of the Metro chapter of the Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts. Hemmes asked for a volunteer to be his alternate. Williams volunteered. Moved by Boyum, seconded by Richmond. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays. Page 2 DRAFT Pag~ 3. Coon Creek Watershed District - January 28, 1'391 ~) 11 MAWD Metro Priorltles and Issues: Kelly collected the surveys that had been dIstributed. 12 Introduce Policy 1.8 Technical Advisory Committee: Kelly recommended the policy be forwarded to the advisory committees Moved by Rlchmond, seconded by Williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays. 13 Introduce Policy 4.1 Permit Procedures: Kelly reviewed the comments received to date. Boyum raised the issue of fees and requested that the issue be addressed in this poliCY. Richmond moved to review the policy again with the discussion of fees. Seconded by williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays. Informational Items 14 Rice Creek Watershed District Proposed Boundary Changes: Kelly reviewed a request for comment from the Rice Creek Watershed District to adjust the common boundary. Mathiesen indicated that no field verification has been done. Williams moved to request Rice Creek to conduct a field inspection to determine and certify that the boundary changes that are proposed are correct as best can be determined. Seconded by Richmond. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays. New Business 15. Williams raised the question of the timing and cost of engineering services citing that the District could hire an engineer for the amount budgeted. Boyum stated he felt that engineering costs were under control. The meeting adjourned at 9:05 PM on a motion by Hentges, seconded by Williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays. Reggie Hemmes, Chairman \ ) ~J ANDOVER FIREFIGHTERS MONTHLY BUSINESS MEETING 12/26/90 ~J~(/f/~ :if " cr - I 0,0;), I i/ .. The meeting was called to o~de~ at 7:00 p.m. by Glenn Smith. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. Roll call was taken. The minutes of Novembe~ 28, 1990 we~e ~ead. Co~~ections to the Minutes we~e p~esented by B. Peach. The Minutes we~e not app~oved. OFFICERS REPORTS COMMITTEE REPORTS PERSONNEL -No ~epo~t. -M. Schilling ~epo~ted the~e a~e six positions to be alloteted fo~ Station 3, p~efe~ably fo~ day positions. -B. Peach poInted out we have 12 people al~eady fo~ Station 2, 3 a~e day people: but we a~e sho~t on people fo~ Station 3. TRAINING -D. Mashuga stated Haz Mat is available at Anoka Tee. -7 ~egional Haz Mat ~esponse teams to be initiated by the State. -OffIce~ classes a~e being offe~ed: see D. Mashuga . .' FIRE MARSHAL -J. Noyes ~epo~ted she check on the junkyards. FIre lanes are good: however, some tires we~e sto~ed outsIde that must be clea~ed out. -City has new unde~ground gas tanks -Chief Smith reported that an EMS-member had argued wIth the Super Ame~ica daytIme manager about people filling thei~ vehIcle while engines were running. T. May stated that It was agaInst the law to do so. Chief Smith requested that the Fi~e Ma~shal should take care of this and that the Firefighte~s should not confront the gene~al publiC on this matter. ' LARGE EQUIPMENT -R. -B. Noyes said the 5-inch hose Is in. Peach ,stated that a line d~awina of all the t~uckS will be avaIlable to the-membership before construction starts. May reported all radios are on order. -T. SMALL EQUIPMENT -J. Pierson repo~ted many items are being ordered. He requested assistance. ~ MAINTENANCE -R. Noyes used alcohol to dry out 4881 airlines. to W '\ f r'-1.tA o AVFD Monthly Business Meeting November 28. 1990 Page 2 E.M.S. SPECIAL BUILDING PUBLIC RELATIONS COMPUTERS FUND RAISING SPECIAL PURCHASES COMMUNICATIONS OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS . , 'J -Po Gengler reported the points have been counted. -The group had an end-of-the-year Pizza party. -A lot of Firefighters have missed the required training on First Responder and must make it up. See P. Gengler. -B. Peach reported the variance on the south station was granted. -So Protivinsky requested preferred dates for the Annual Christmas Party for the Firefighters. -No report -No report -No report -Chief Smith reported the cai Is YTD are 222 -J. Menglecolk came to the meeting to voice his appreciation to the Fire Department for the efforts made to save his house at Sycamore Street. -B. Peach presented the feasibility on manned stations. He gave credit to D. Reitan, J. Richardson and J. Pierson for their input. See attached sheets -Comments and questions raised by membership: T. May asked is there really a need? B. Peach proposed 3 people on a shift at a pay rate of $25 per person per shift. D. Jones claimed we are not subject to the minimum wage law. D. Mashuga stated the entire membership will be voting on this matter. B. Peach suggested April 1. 1991, as a start date. -MOTION by B. Peach. Seconded by M. Neuschwander to present to the Department a change to the Constitution at the annual meeting. 1991: Article II. Section 2 This organization shall be composed of no more than fifty (50) active members. ~ AVFD Monthly Business Meeting November 28, 1990 Page 3 As a clarification, B. Peach stated he intended a second amendment to define and allow non-firefighter EMS personnel memberhip on the Department. T. May suggested that to prevent confusion, these motions be retractred and re-introduced as changes to already introduced motions. This would simplify the annual meeting procedure by allowing a vote on only one motion. B. Peach accepted the suggestions and RESCINDED all motions on the floor. -MOTION by B. Peach, Seconded by R. Noyes, to amend motion by M. Schilling to present to Department a change to the Constitution at the Annual meeting, 1991: Article II, Section 2 This organization shall be composed of no more than fifty (50) active members. DISCUSSION: if this amendment passes, it will be presented as the only change to Article II, Section 2. If this amendment fails, M. Schilling's previous motion will be presented as the only change to Article II, Section 2. P. Gengler objected to removing 15 medical members. B. Peach stated we have no need to specifY maximum number of medical members, and a fol lowing motion wil I create a real membership status recognizing medical members. VOTE ON MOTION: 15 yes, 7 no. Motion carried. Amendment will be presented at the January 26, 1991, Annual meeting. P. Gengler left the meeting. -MOTION by B. Peach, Seconded by R. Noyes, to amend motion by M. Schilling to present to the Department at the Annual meeting a change to the Constitution: Article II, Section 3 Add medical member: A member who is certified First Responder or above. , '---.J DISCUSSION: B. Peach explained the previous amendment to Section 3 referred to S.O.Ps which have not been adopted by the Fire Department. '---) AVFD Monthly Business Meeting November 28, 1990 Page 4 VOTE ON MOTION: 18 yes, 3 no. Motion carried. Amendment will be presented at the January 26, 1991, Annual meeting. -The nominations for Officer positions at the Annual meeting were then reopened. B. Peach accepted nomination for Chief B. Peach declined the Assistant Chief nomination G. Smith accepted nomination for Assistant Chief D. Jones declined nomination for Secretary B. Peach deciined nomination for Secretary R. Noyes declined nomination for Secretary T. Miller declinded nomination for Secretary J. Pierson accepted nomination for Secretary -Discussion: Should the Secretary be required to chair the Personnel Committee. The consensus was it was not required but should be referred to the Officers' meeting. CLAIMS ADJOURNMENT -A motion was made and seconded; meeting adjourned. RespectfullY submitted for correction, r$6~ Bob Peach, Captain .' '\ o o , ~) NOTES ON FEASIBILITY 1. Firefighters should be free to have family and friends stop ~ by. 2. Maximum flexibility should al low t~ading shifts or partial shifts and voluntary shift selection. 3. Reasonable effort should be made to make the statIon comfortable and attractIve. 4. Some time, 1 to 2 "ours, should be assigned for work or study. 5. Crew may leave station with truck for reasonable errands ~lithin the City -- groceries, rent move, check permits. 6. Al I Firefighters or shifts should have Firefighter I and Live Burn completed. 7. At least two people should have First Responder. 8. Lead Firefighter on shift should have minimum time as FIrefighter If no officer is on shift. 9. In computing costs, balance savings from rescue, weekend offIcer Including medIcal calls, points for standIng around when still alarms will be adequate, costs for minor maintenance, Asst Fire Marshall pay and housekeeping.. 10. Non-firefighter medical personel could bescheduled on weekends as fourth person at probationary pay. , . 'to' ~~) '\ ~- ) .- .. ARGUMENTS AGAINST OVERNIGHT STATION ASSIGNMENT 1. It would demand tIme from the FIrefIghters' busy schedules. ' 2. It would take FIrefIghters away from home two or three nights a month -- spouses may have some reluctance. 3. It may Increase the cost of fIre servIce. 4. It would lnc~ease management responsIbilItIes of the offIcers In assIgnIng s~lfts. duty projects. etc. . ., . I 5. It would require add(tlonal traInIng for all FIrefIghters for medica! response. c... M /I Y DIe: <1 F () otZ.e:-DoJ<.-t. ? f/(.jZt;;f1!Jf" I vvt/,,,eou~ ;&7/~~ r/~~ . .. .. .' : '. ~) ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF OVERNIGHT STATION ASSIGNMENT 1. Most of the Firefighters want to try It. , 2. It would provide the City with full paId response for the cost of a Volunteer Department. . 3. It would Improve response times on fires and medical calls. 4. It would be a new standard for fire service In the area. 5. It would. Improve'mbrale for the followIng reasons I a) Firefighters who don't live by the statIon would have a chance to make fIrst truck out on a call. b) Three-man teams would get to know each other. creating greater comradery. c) Teams can be mIxed between day/night/rescue. whIch wIll help to reduce bickering and Jealousy. d) For obvious non-emergency (Ie. police request for washdown). 50 Firefighters would not have to be awakened Just to stand around. e) More Firefighters would have an opportunity at leadership. f) It would allow Firefighters leisure time to acquaInt themselves with location and operation of equipment. g) It would allow tIme for voluntary traIning by Individuals. h) Ideas. suggestions. plans for better service would almost certaInly result as Firefighters discuss their thoughts. 6. Everybody will be fully trained as firefighters. First responder.and Haz-Mat-Level One. 7. Extracatlon equipment would be on the truck with trained personnel to run It. 8. Three Flreflghteres In uniform would look more professional than In Jeans and T-shIrt.\ 9. Station crews would be able to provide some malnt. on trucks and station. eliminating the Fifth W~p~~sday work detail. 10. Residents would be getting Increased fire protection with a budget that Is used Just for rescue at this time. , 11. Residents would have.a visibly manned station to stop by and a~k questions and look at eqUipment. etc. 12. It would solve manning prOblems with rescue. 13. It would Increase the. number of stop bys Increasing staff at no cost. \ ~) - , ~ . '" (Advantages 2) ~ 14. It would eliminate the need fo~ weekend duty offIce~ pay. , 15. The~e would be no d~Ivlng of p~lvate ca~s to a scene. 16. The ~escue ~Ig would not be sittIng outsIde all the time elImInate ~ust, sta~tlng cold and less"runnIng a~ound and fuel consumptIon. 17. Duty crews would be able to wo~k on p~eplans, bu~n pe~mIts, thus saving money on AssIstant FI~e Ma~shal pay. :. . . 18. The~e would always be a mInImum of th~ee people ~espondIng to a call whe~e the~e Is as few as one ~espondlng at this tIme. 19. It saves on the cost of t~aInlng ~escue pe~sonnel as such t~aInIng would now be done at no cost. . . , ~) ! " . ~ t. /~/~r*;;e;- 1/ '\ I '\~ ANDOVER FIREFIGHTERS MONTHLY BUSINESS MEETING 11/28/90 The meeting was called to o~de~ at 7:00 p.m. by Glenn Smith. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. Roll call was taken. The minutes of Octobe~ 22 we~e ~ead. The minutes we~e accepted as ~ead. * P~esented awa~d ce~tificates of app~eciation to M~. Michael Mandy and M~. Edwin D~opps, Jr. * Howa~d Koolick, City Finance Di~ector, explained employee status. 1.45 pe~cent of pay goes to Medicare: the~e is no need to pay FICA. OFFICERS REPORTS -4881 should ~oll immediate on all day calls unless othe~wise notified by duty office~. -1991 new office~s' positions: 3 captains and 4 lieutenants -Assistant Chief D. Mashuga ~eviewed 5 calls on 11/27/90 -see officer ~eport fo~ other information COMMITTEE REPORTS PERSONNEL -voted on two new active membe~s D. Jones: 22 yes, 0 no. Active as of 11/28/90 R. Smith: 24 yes, 0 no. Active as of 11/28/90 -Po Nelson ~equested findings on manned station survey which had been completed on an earlier date -D. Mashuga made a that elections open and voted ca~~ied. -Chief Smith stated the Captain and Lieutenant elections are to be held at the end of the Februa~y business meeting. -Nominations fo~ Chief. Assistant Chief and Sec~eta~y we~e opened. Chief G. Smith (p~esent & accepted) B. Peach (not present) Asst./Chief D. Mashuga (p~esent & accepted) ! B. Peach (not present) Sec~eta~y J. Noyes (declined) G. Kroll (declined) M. Schilling (declined) D. Jones (p~esent & accepted) L. Capeling (present & accepted) -Nominations for Chief, Assistant Chief and Sec~eta~y wil I be closed the Saturday before the Annual Meeting. -Election committee: T. May J. Noyes motion, seconded by G. Smith. fo~ Captain and Lieutenant be on by active membe~s. Motion . '\ '--J J. Koltes TRAINING -D. Mashuga requested training ideas Ice rescue - sprinklers - defensive driving - r~rlin ~nmmunlcation5 ,-) AVFD Honthly November 28. Page 2 Business Heeting 1990 FIRE HARSHAL LARGE EQUIPMENT SMALL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE E.H.S. SPECIAL BUILDING PUBLIC RELATIONS COMPUTERS FUND RAISING SPECIAL PURCHASES COMMUNICATIONS ,-J OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS -J. Noyes reported North Suburban has new recycle guidel ines -Chimney brush available - $20 deposit -Day permits available because of snow on ground -K. Starr and S. Protivinsky delivered free pumpkins to schools -R. Noyes and B. Peach reported all new trucks are ordered. Pickups - spring delivery Tankers - September delivery Aerial and pumpers - late fall delivery -Ordered two 2.5 inch female to 4-inch male storz siamese on 4886 and 4887 -M. Sandborn, M. Winczski, H. Neuschwander will be outf i t ting 4890 -R. Sowada requested a dunk tank lowering rack -Need one more commi'ttee member -A small tools procurement being assessed by K. Anderson -Po Gengler reported First Responder starts Saturday, December 1 -B. Peach reported Station 1 drawings are complete -A zoning variance is needed to build south station -Condemnation on Station 2 site is in process. The size is about 5 acres. -No report -Training records are now on computer. ther& are additions or corrections. Capeiing. ' If noti fy L. -No report -No report -Chief Smith reported the calls YTD are 205 -The station needs cleaning again -The new room still needs to be finished -The small tape recorder is missing -B. Dil Ion moved to introduce Resolution A. a Resolution concerning Roberts' Rules of Order. R~solution fails for lack of a Second. . , -.) AVFD Monthly Business Meeting November 28, 1990 Page 3 -B. Dillon moved to introduce Resolution B, a Resolution concerning fire station siting. Seconded by B. Peach. DISCUSSION: B. Peach claimed all concerns regarding new stations have been discussed over the past several years. B. Dillon admitted he swore at officers at a past meeting. B. Peach called for a point of order claiming B. Dlllon was discussing material not germane to motion. B. Dillon left the meetlng. Resolution was voted on: failed unanimously. -Motion by M. Schilllng, Seconded by B. Peach, to change constitution to read: Article II, Section 3 MEDICAL MEMBERS A member who has met all requirements of the Rescue Squad Standard Operating Procedures. The motion was approved for consideration at the January 26 Annual meeting, -Motion by M. Schilling, Seconded by P. Gengler, to change constitution to read: Article II, Section 2 This organizatIon shall be composed of no less than fifteen (15) nor more than fifty (50) active members and 15 medlcal members. The motion was approved for consideration at the January 26 Annual meeting. CLAIMS ADJOURNMENT -A motion was made and seconded; meeting adjourned. RespectfullY submitted for correctlon, tfY tP~ i Bob Peach, Captain ; / -~ , . \.~ j -I " "-/ I :., Rcsolut.ion Ilovelllber <:'8,1990 Presented by 150b Dillon Where as section 60f the by laws clearly states I II Roberta Rules 01' Order Revised shall be thb purl1uentary authority for the conduct of Imsir.ail8 aeet.lngs of thIs organlzs_lon. Where ~s ChIef SmIth cOMmItted hImself t.oabide by Roberts Rules inin the lettur of Jan. JO 1990. Where as the city council has com~itted support tor Roberta Rules of Orde at yhe last council meeting. Where as itea 2, July 12 letter James Hawkins to Robert Dillon states -Iaa not cclear what your question ia,however,in relationship to official policy of tho Depart.mentsuch official polIcy ~ust be ajopted by the members as a whole or thwrw is specific authority under Article 1, Ser~J.o~ lof the By Laws tb have comMittees appointed~ to do work for the good an eDdl~elfare pf 'he or~anizatlon. It id my opinion that the meMbersblpcoul could dulcr,ate to a cowalttee authority to deter.lne afrlcial policy for the organIzation if it 80 decided. Wherg as I tind no such act.lon recorded In .dnute' of the organization: ~'herefore be it reaolve d that no further report be tkken to tbe city couDeil representing the :Official Policyor the Fire Departaent: that has not been aubaitted to theme.berahip for debate, a.end.ent, being voted uo or down, and recorded in lbb ainutesof the organization1'Acoamittee report ia motion before the body who authorized the co~tttee, the aeaberahip,and can go no further ontil the aeaber_hip haa acted on it. Page 58 of Roberta Rulea ocr OrderllNo aHUlion can be aade in the aue.bly to what haa occurred in coamittee, except it be by reportor the co..ittee or by general concent. fhia weald indicate tbat the report would go tb t~ e Ile.berahip. Be it further reaolved that the city council vacate and reeind all report to it that were not properly constItuted, voted on by the aeaberahlp and recorded In the alnutea, . . , .',., h.t :I'...., . , '.' I . ," ,0 J Areeolutlon concerning fbre statlon sights for the citI of Andover Where as there are three seperate and dlstint res ponce ares in rural Andover. Where as the countl roads constitute the maln through streets in the city of Andover. Where as peat ground, in many cas.s,dictated where the countl roads were bullt as well as where the residential did and wlll occur. Where as the part ot the citI west of Co. road 9 andnorth of the urban seri services area,and south of countl ditch6 constitute one of therural responc9 ares. It is esentioly cut off from the rest of the city bI lack of east west roades. Where as the area north of Co.dltch 6 andwest of Co. ditch 7 constitute another res ponce area and is again cut off by lack of east west roads. Where as the area north of the urban services area, whwer ever that ends, will be a third rural res ponce area. rwo isues will weigh heavll on the decilsion on how to S8 rv this area. rhe first will be the decission on wbether water and sewer will be extended easr of the B.N. tracks..rhe other wlll be wheter Bunker Lake Blvd wlll eventuallI go over the B.N. tracks. Ualll these isues are established lt would be dlfflcult to address this area. Where As rural ares are difficult to.serve ,at best, because of travel dist dlstances, each of these ares should be served frOD a station neer the center and on county roades provlding access in se~eral dlrect10ns.fhis would put the maximu. cuaber of hones 1n the shortest d1stance. . ~h~r.6er8th8iDasohe8Irthaioweonna8t4~ke a new studl,to address these isues pb~r~~oe,tb~i'D ~.olfUdtlbatonnaerd$ke a n~ studl, to dddress thies isues ~The~for be it resolved that we undertake a new stwl to address thies '/ hues ,put the station on hold, and attempt to involve the .ellbership, atCOl:o'JA../ and the publ1c 1n these ver,r important del1berat10ns.~ / ; / . j ,~ ,~ C}\ 7:30 P.M. '\ J CITY of ANDOVER Regular City Council Meeting--February 19, 1991 Call to Order Resident Forum Agenda Approval Approval of Minutes Discussion Items 1. Public Hearing/Ordinance 8 2. Rezoning/Ed Fields & Sons 3. Variance/Richard Beckes 4. City Celebration/Downtown Merchants 5. Adopt Fund Balance policy 6. Approve 1991 MSA Street Construction 7. Sketch Plan/Indian Meadows 4th & 5th & 6th 8. Indian Meadow~ 6th Platting Proposal 9. Recommend CCWD Member 10. WDE/Hanson Boulevard HRA Meeting 11. HRA Officers 12. Public Hearing/1990 CDBG Contingency Funds Staff, Committee, Commissions 13. Approve Fire Department Election Results 14. Amend Ordinance 42/Fire Ordinance 15. Turnout Geat Purchase/Fire Department 16. Approve Classification & Sale of Forfeit Land 17. Charter Commission Non-Discussion Items 18. Receive January Financial Reports 19. Approve Engineering Rates/Bonestroo Engineering 20. Adopt Resolution/State Aid Cuts 21. Approve proclamation/volunteers of America week 22. Approve stop Sign/147th Lane & Guarani street Approval of Claims Adjournment ~ _i~/-"""'-""""""'C i~:'t. i' '~_ j./';i\. ,:Jt~ ~i i:J ,';,; -~;j ~.\~~ _ Jl .~,;~ _...~~rfiI'" ~"",,~'\'li' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION DATE Fphrll"ry 1 q 1 q q 1 '- AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APn~E~ FOR NO. Approval of Minutes AG ~ Admin. .v'l{ . ITEM Approval of Minutes \~. NO. BY: V. Volk - The City vi Council is requested to approve the following minutes: February 5, 1991 Regular Meeting February 5, 1991 BRA Meeting COUNCIL ACTION ) MOTION BY SECOND BY TO ~ f~ir" -""""\ , "" ,',.":!.,. ..'J..',',..' o ~ ~ . ::'~ g i~,., ,j't \",.,,,,,._,..,,.,,f",j~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION February 19, 1991 DATE BY: APPRKb. D FOR AGE ' , BY: IV J ITEM NO'1, "-"U.I...,- UCC1L.LI!,;/ Amendment Ordinance 8 Accessory Building ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ~,. Planning David L. Carlberg City Planner AGENDA S.ECTION . NQ D1scuss10n Items REQUEST The Andover City Council is requested to review the proposed amendment to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05 (K), relating to accessory structures. (The reason for the public hearing is on the following page). BACKGROUND Upon receiving a request from a resident to construct a pole building on a lot with more than three acres in an R-4 district, a discrepancy in the Ordinance was noticed. Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05 (k) states "No permanent sheet metal, painted or unpainted accessory building, except small garden sheds not exceeding one hundred twenty (120) square feet, shall be allowed on parcels of three acres (3 a.) or less in districts zoned R-3 and R-4 within the Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA) Boundary. The foregoing shall not apply to painted and finished metal siding normally used on residential structures. For clarification purposes, the Ordinance should state" No permanent sheet metal, painted or unpainted accessory building, except small garden sheds not exceeding one hundred twenty (120) square feet, shall be allowed on parcels of three acres (3 a.) or less in R-1, R-2 and R-3 districts and in districts zoned R-3 and R-4 within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) Boundary. The foregoing shall not apply to painted and finished metal siding normally used on residential structures. Attached is the proposed Amendment to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05 (K) for Council review and adoption. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY ,---) TO SECOND BY , o ~) Council is holding the public hearing on the advice of the City Attorney. The Ordinance was incorrectly typed and so it allows pole buildings in R-3 and R-4 districts on parcels of three or more acres. The intent was to not allow pole buildings in R-3 and R-4 districts regardless of the size of the parcel. Since it was a staff error, and the intent of the ordinance has not changed, the Attorney said Council can hold the public hearing. ~) . ') ~-_/ CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORD NO. 8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1971; ORDINANCE NO. 8F, EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 19, 1980; ORDINANCE NO. 8I, EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 21, 1980; ORDINANCE NO. 8U, EFFECTIVE JULY 19, 1983; AND ORDINANCE NO. 8DDD, EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 1, 1988 KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS: Ordinance No.8, effective January 1, 1971; Ordinance No. 8F, effective February 19, 1980; Ordinance No. 8I, effective October 21, 1980; Ordinance No. 8U, effective July 19, 1983; Ordinance No. 8DDD, effective November 1, 1988 are hereby amended as follows: SECTION 4.05 ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES. K. No permanent sheet metal, painted or unpainted accessory building, except small garden sheds not exceeding one hundred twenty (120) square feet, shall be allowed on parcels of three acres (3 a.) or less in R-1, R-2 and R-3 districts and in districts zoned R-3 and R-4 within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) Boundary. The foregoing shall not apply to painted and finished metal siding normally used on residential structures. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 19th day of February, 1991. CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Ken Orttel, Mayor Victoria volk, City Clerk ) ',J .' '~'''_,'C'l''~'~'~~'.~", ((}\) '~l;~,,,,,,,,~-!!;'i",Ji,~~# CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION February 19, 1991 DATE BY: ezonlng le s ~J.M R-1 to Ag Preserve :1.. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT 1> Planning ~ David L. Carlberg City Planner AGENDA S,ECTION . NO. D1Scusslon Items REQUEST The Andover City Council is asked to review the request of Edward Fields & Sons Inc. to rezone property from R-1, Single Family Rural to Agricultural Preserve. (See legal description on the attached Planning and Zoning Commission report dated January 22, 1991) . BACKGROUND The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their January 22, 1991 meeting, recommended approval of the rezoning request and in doing so cited the following reasons as listed on the attached resolution. APPLICABLE ORDINANCES Ordinance No. 57, the Agricultual Preserve Ordinance, regulates the preservation of long term agricultural lands. Ordinance No.8, Section 5.02, establishes the procedure for changing zoning district boundaries. Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 (B) establishes the criteria for granting a Special Use Permit. These same criteria shall be used for rezoning requests as well. RECOMMENDATION The Planning & Zoning Commission and Staff recommend approval of the variance requested by Edward Field & Sons, Inc. to rezone property from R-1, Single Family Rural to Agricultural Preserve. COUNCIL ACTION . . MOTION BY \ , '--' TO SECOND BY ,~ CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -91 A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE REZONING REQUEST OF EDWARD FIELDS AND SONS, INC. TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RURAL TO AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE WHEREAS, Edward fields and Sons Inc. has requested a rezoning from R-1, Single Family Rural to Agricultural Preserve on the property legally described as: THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 825 FEET; THENCE EAST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 1668 FEET; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. AND THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, EXCEPT THE EAST 300 FEET OF THE SOUTH 800 FEET THEREOF. AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, EXCEPT THE SOUTH 800 FEET THEREOF, AND EXCEPT THAT PART OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER LYING EAST OF THE WEST 860 FEET THEROF. SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF ANY. \ 'J WHEREAS, the Planning & zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of Ordinance 8, Section 5.03 (B), specifically that there is no negative effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the occupants of surrounding lands; that there is no anticipated negative impact on existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and lands; there will be no negative effects ~ \ ~ Page Two Rezoning - Edward Fields & Sons, Inc. February 19, 1991 on the values of property and scenic view in the surrounding area; and that it has a positive effect as compared to the existing and future Comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission finds that it is within the City's objective to maintain open and rural spaces; and WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission finds that the request is also in compliance with Ordinance No. 57, the Agricultural Preserve Ordinance and Ordinance No.8, Section 5.02; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no opposition to said request; and WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the rezoning requested; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the planning & zoning Commission to rezone the above legally described property from R-1, Single Family Rural to Agricultural Preserve. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 19th day of February, 1991 CITY OF ANDOVER Ken Orttel, Mayor ATTEST Victoria Volk, City Clerk ,-.J Planning and Zoning Commission Janua.y 22, 1991 - Minutes Page 3 iU~L:C ~EARING: REZONING/R-1 TO AG PRESERVE - Ed Fields & Sons. _n_._ S_ction 21. Ranoe 32. Township 24 Chai.pe.son Fe..ls called the Public Hea.ing to o.de. at 7:51 p.m. M.. Ca.lbe.g .eviewed the .equest of Ectwa.d Fields & Sons, Inc., to .ezone about 120 ac.es f.om R-1 to Ag.icultu.al P.ese.ve, noting the applicable o.dinances and Commission options. He pointed out the Staff .ecommendatlon is fo. Option 1, app.oval of the .equest. The p.ope.ty has been used fo. fa.ming fo. many, many yea.s. Ed ~Ields - stated the a.eas depicted on the map a.e Inco..ect, as the p.ope.ty shown adjacent to Round Lake Bouleva.d does not belong to him, and the a.eas being .equested fo. Ag p.ese.ve a.e continuous. The.e was some discussion on the legal desc~iptlons given, on the co.~ected p.ope.ties to be .ezoned. and on whethe. the public hea.ing is still legal. Afte. studying the legals, M.. Ca.lbe.g stated the map Inco..ectly shows the p.oposed Ag p.ese.ve a.eas on the fl.st two 40-ac.e sections east of Round Lake Bouleva.d. Fo. those two 40s, the zonings should be .eve.sed -- the slashed a.ea should be left blank indicating R-4 zone, the blank a.eas should be shown as slashed Indicating the p.oposed Ag p.ese.ve a.eas. The th.ee 40s to the .Ight co..ectly indicate the p.oposed zonings. M.. Ca.lbe.g the official Is located. feet of the being owned also stated that because of the long legal desc.iption, public notice was a gene.al statement of whe.e the a.ea It was also dete.mined that all the pa.cels within 300 p.ope.ty we.e notified as .equi.ed, most of the p.ope.ty by M.. Fields himself. The.e was no fu.the. public testimony. MOTION by Pease, Seconded by Vistad, to close the Public Hea.ing. Motion ca..ied unanimouslY. MOTION by Peek, Seconded by Vistad, that the Andove. Planning and Zoning Commission .ecommends app.oval of the .ezoning .equest by Ed Fields and Sons, Inc., to .ezone the p.ope.ty as pe. the legal desc.iption contained in the Staff .epo.t f.om R-1 Single Fami ly Residential to Agricultu.al P.ese.ve. '\ 'J Planning Commission finds the p.oposal meets the c.ite.ia established in O.dinance 8, Section 5.03 (B), specificallY that the.e is no negative effect on the p.oposed use upon the health, safety, mo.als and gene.al welfa.e of the occupants and su..ounding lands; that the.e is no anticipated negative impact on existing and anticipated t.affic conditions including pa.King facilities on adjacent st.eets and lands; the~e will be no negative effects on the values of p.ope.ty and scenic view in the su..ounding a.ea; and that it has a positive effect compa.ed to the existing and potential futu.e Ccmp.ehensive Plan. Planning and Zoning Commission January 22. 1991 - Minutes Page 4 ~ <Public Hearing: Rezoning/R-1 to Ag Preserve-E. Fields. Continued) <Motion continued) It is also within the City/s objective to maintain open and rural spaces. A Public Hearing was held and there were no comments. It is in compliance with OrdInance 57. the Agricultural Preserve Ordinance; and it is in compliance with Ordinance 8. SectIon 5.02. The matter Is to go the City Council at its February 19 meetIng. DISCUSSION: The Commission requested the Staff re-check the legal description for accuracy. It was also noted that there is an a?plIcatIon process through the State to record Ag Preserve land. VOTE ON MOTION: Carried unanimously. The Hearing closed at 8:10 p.m. The Commission recessed at 8:10; reconvened at 8:16 p.m. VARIANCE - SIDEYARD SETBACK ENCROACHMENT/RIchard 3eckes. 14484 Jonquil Street NW Mr. Carlberg reviewed the background and applicable ordinances for the request of Richard Beckes. 14484 Jonquil Stceet NW. to allow the placement of a 8 x 12-foot storage shed enccoaching about 23 feet into the sideyard setback of 145th Avenue NW. The shed is alceady up and was discovered by the Building Official. The sideyard setback is 25 feet. and there is also a 45-foot drainage easement in the back of the lot. Though the lot has its I imitations. the Staff feels the shed . can be placed along the north side of the garage without requiring a variance. Because of that optIon and it can be considered an eye sore in its present location. Staff recommends denial. that it should be moved. Richard Beckes - explaIned there is a steep drop-off starting almost immediately from the back of the house. The shed cannot be moved to the south without encountering a proclem with the slope. He even had to add some dirt to raise one side about a foot to level the shed where it is now. It is sitting on tImbers. but not fastened to the timbers. He said he moved the shed as far south as he could away from the curb and still be on a level part of the yard. He started the shed in September. , ~) There was a lengthy discussion on the restrictions on the lot itself given the setback requirements. drainage easement. and steep slope in the back yard. Mr. Beckes explained there has never been any water in the drain~ge easement in the three years he/s lived there. as it all pools to the south. He couldn/t put it in the drainage easement in the southwest corner because that is where the play yard is. and his wife Is a licensed daycare provider. That is the most safe location for the play yard. There is also an apron for the storm water drainage from the sur~ounding area in his back yard. CITY OF ANDOVER "- 'J REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION January 22, 1991 AGENDA ITEM 4. Public Hearing - Rezoning - R-1 to Ag Preserve - Ed Fields & Sons Inc. DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning ~ David L. Carlberg BY: city planner APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: REQUEST The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review the request of Edward Fields & Sons, Inc. to rezone property from R-1, Single Family Rural to Agricultural Preserve. The property is legally described as: The North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, except the following described parcel: Beginning at the northwest corner of the North Half of said Northwest Quarter; thence South along the west line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance of 825 feet; thence East parallel to the north line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance of 1668 feet; thence North parallel to the west line of said Northwest Quarter; thence West along said north line to the point of beginning. AND The Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, except the east 300 feet of the south 800 feet thereof. AND The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 32, Range 24,Anoka County, Minnesota, except the south 800 feet thereof, and except that part of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter lying East of the west 860 feet thereof. subject to reservations, restrictions and easements of record, if any. "- ,-../ Page Two Fields Rezoning January 22, 1991 ~~ APPLICABLE ORDINANCES Ordinance No. 57, the Agricultural Preserve Ordinance, identifies and classifies lands in the City of Andover for which logical and proper long term use is agricultural and to preserve and protect said land from unnecessary encroachment by non-agricultural uses pursuant to Minnesota Statute 473H. Ordinance No.8, Section 5.02 establishes the procedure for changing zoning district boundaries (rezoning). Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(B), establishes the criteria for granting a Special Use Permit. These same criteria shall also be considered in the determination of granting a rezoning request. The criteria include: the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets and land, the effect on values of property and scenic views in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan. Attached for your review is a letter dated November 7, 1983 from Bill Hawkins, City Attorney, explaining the need to make findings of fact in all rezoning cases. COMMISSION OPTIONS A. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend approval of the rezoning request by Edward Fields & Sons, Inc. to rezone the above legally described property from R-1, single Family Rural to Agricultural Preserve. The Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the criteria established in Ordinance No.8 Section 5.03(B) and is in compliance with Ordinance 57, the Agricultural Preserve Ordinance. B. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend denial of the rezoning request by Edward Fields & Sons, Inc. to rezone the above legally described property from R-l, single Family Rural to Agricultural Preserve. The Planning Commission finds that the proposal does not meet the criteria established in Ordinance No.8 Section 5.03(B) and is not in compliance with Ordinance 57, the Agricultural Preserve Ordinance. ) C. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may table the item. .j STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends option A "--'<...I ~~ .~'''''.I . ....... :." . .' .... ''', . ....... . ....: :::"::':;:"':" .......... .' ~. :.-: ::-:: . . ,...,. ~ \.' " .' , . 'j: i j '.':."1:, I:. . I. . ; " : t ~ , ~ ~' I E:~sr / / , , '-\'-. .,. ..:-:=-:-\ ' '" . . .. , f'~1 """I''''' , - -I "-';,J- 1~'."'.4 '~J 1I 'I 'I ::\:- .:. ,,'.: :...... . -'. ..... .., . . . .. , .: I '., .;'.:' ... . to. :.l. '.,. I .,.:' i . ......1 .', .... "' '. .' I.'. : . ..... ~ . ....:....1.. .... j ..... ~ ..... . " " " '. ) . , " Ntf;HTlNf;,AU Jf18HTlNG.AJ;E !:STArrS . SECONO AlJOITJON NIGHTINGAL~ /. €STAT€S . ~ _ ..J 3 , ,I. !.. .. . . . .' ", .; .:\.' [ " ! --; -::---.,'"'7'7'":-' -.-:~- . .~ .....;. .. .... ,. ()rlf:tf 4ej? I ~ ~ I: l' o REZONING REQUEST \i e..4;.~ain~' t. ! \! t ~U'~ 1 t", ----If. I Il f JMJ 081991 ~ i F(!)RMrrO'r;~NlI0';:R I I BuildlllU u..:,.,.... ;,11 ~n~ I . ..' ----.----. .- ~ CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BLVD. N.W. ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 property Address Legal Description of property: (Fill in whichever is appropriate) Lot Block Addition Plat Parcel PIN (If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal) Reason for Request 10 e "c" b f~ r(,'fer+~ l.'''''''~''''' , -n. 0'--<--- r J 'P('~r<!.' f'1 I 1\ 40('.~~I+LL...,,-l ':?"'c!~"'r_-2_- Current zoning R-l Requested zoning Agricultural Preserve ********************************************************************** Name of Applicant Edward Fields & Sons. Inc. Address 15421- Round Lk. Blvd. NW Anoka MN 55104 Home phone 421-6962 Business phone 421-5283 Signature ~-<<!//~~/~:,~ ~ Date;' /03 171 ********************************************************************** Property Owner (Fee Owner) (If different from above) Address Home Phone Business Phone Signature Date ********************************************************************** Attach a scaled drawing of the property and structures affected showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures within 100 feet. The names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet of the ~ subject property mus_t-a~e provided. Application Fee~:~50'00 Date Paid ~ Receipt 1t ,3,'6C)/.::3 Filing Fee: $10.00 - /"7/''-7-91 -------- CITY of ANDOVER City of Andover County of Anoka state of Minnesota Notice of Public Hearing The City of Andover Planning and zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, January 22, 1991 at 7:30 P.M. or as soon thereafter as can be heard to consider the request of Edward Fields & Sons, Inc. to rezone the property legally described below from R-1, Residential, to Agricultural Preserve. The north 1/2 of the Northwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 32, Range 24, Anoka County, MN. (approximate location is south of County Road 20 and between Round Lake Boulevard and Nightingale Street N.W.). All persons desiring to be heard will be given the opportunity to do so at the above time and location. U~!~ Victoria Volk - City Clerk '\ '-) 12? 3224 110007 2 I 32 24 24 000\ 'Rlchard Shepard Ed Fields 15548 Round Lake Blvd. NW 15421 Round Lake Blvd. NW iAndover MN 55304 Andover, MN 55304 20, ~ 'l 24 II 0008 Ri,,--)rd Shepard 2 I 32 24 \ 3 000\ 15548 Round Lake Blvd. NW Knoll Farms Andover MN 55304 15709 Round Lake Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 20 32 24 110010 Kenneth & Sally Larson 15554 Round Lake Blvd. NW Andover MN 55304 213224 14000\ Kenneth Slyzuk 14124 Crosstown Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 20 32 24 1\ 0006 Robert Filkins 15620 Round Lake Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 21 32 24 11 0002 Farmham Partnership 3640 - 152nd Lane N.W Andover, MN 55304 203224110005 Raymond & O. Fields 15642 Round Lake Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 20 32 24 110002 Raymond & O. Fields 15642 Roudn Lake Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 20 32 24 1 \ 0009 Knoll Farms 15709 Round Lake Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 20 32 24 \4 Ed Fields & 15421 Round Andover, MN 0006 Sons Lake Blvd. 55304 NW 20 32 24 14 0005 Joseph & B. Halek 3301 - 154th Lane NW Andover, Mn 55304 2132 24 230002 Ed Fields 15421 Round Lake Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 . '\ 'J i,f'~/"""'C''''''''''''''"",\ ,~ff ',~, \;~::. . Ji \. J'~~" it 'f", -0-/ ;~':~''C:Jc.~';l'i""e#(tl.7 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION February 19, 1991 AGENDA S.ECTION . NO. D1SCUSSlon Items DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Plannlng ITEM NO'3. OeCKelS Vc1LJ.c1I1Ce 14484 Jonquil st. NW David L. Carlberg, City Planner ~ APPR~ FOR AG~1u BY:! ,) BY: REQUEST Richard Beckes has requested a variance to allow for the placement of a shed encroaching twenty-five (25) feet into the sideyard setback along 145th Ave NW. BACKGROUND The shed in question, was built this past fall and placed fourteen feet behind the curb on 145th Avenue NW. In addition to the shed being located in the required sideyard setback, the shed has also been placed on a ten (10) foot utility easement and a forty-five foot drainage easement. (Consult the attached Planning & Zoning Commission report dated January 22, 1991). PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their January 22, 1991 meeting, recommended denial of the variance request by Mr. Beckes (See P & Z Minutes attached). The decision was made due to the severe encroachment into the required sideyard setback. In addition, the placement of the accessory building on a utility easement and drainage easement supported the Commission's recommendation of denial. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council that the variance requested by Mr. Richard Beckes to allow for the placement of an accessory structure (shed) encroaching twenty-five (25) feet into the required sideyard setback be denied. Attached is a resolution for council review and approval. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY - TO SECOND BY ,J CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -91 A RESOLUTION DENYING THE VARIANCE REQUEST OF RICHARD BECKES FOR THE PLACEMENT OF AN 8' x 12' ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ENCROACHING TWENTY-FIVE (25) FEET INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK ALONG 145TH AVENUE NW ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14484 JONQUIL STREET NW (LOT 9, BLOCK 2, CREEKRIDGE ESTATES). WHEREAS, Richard Beckes has requested a variance to allow for the placement of an 8' X 12' accessory structure encroaching twenty-five (25) feet into the side yard setback along 145th Avenue NW; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that said request does not meet the criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04 in that no hardship exists due to the unique shape or topography of the property which would preclude the property owner reasonable use of his property; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission finds that the request does not meet the established setback requirements specified in Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council denial of the variance request as it does not meet the criteria of Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and hereby denies the request of Richard Beckes to place an 8' x 12' accessory structure encroaching twenty-five (25) feet into the side yard setback. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 19th day of February, 1991. CITY OF ANDOVER Ken Orttel, Mayor ATTEST: Victoria Volk, City Clerk , '\ 'J Planning and Zoning Commission Januaey 22, 1991 - Minutes Page 4 o (Public Heaeing: Rezoning/R-1 to Ag Peeseeve-E. Fields, Continued) (Motion continued) It is also within the City/s objective to maintain open and eueal spaces. A Public Heaeing was held and theee weee no comments. It is in compliance with Oedinance 57, the AgLicultueal PLeseeve Oedinance; and it is in compliance with Oedinance 8, Section 5.02. The mattee is to go the City Council at its Febeuaey 19 meeting. DISCUSSION: The Commission eequested the Staff ee-check the legal descLiption fOL accueacy. It was also noted that theLe is an application peocess theough the State to "ecoed Ag Peesecve land. VOTE ON MOTION: Caeeied unanimously. The HeaLing closed at 8:10 p.m. The Commission cecessed at 8:10; ceconvened at 8:16 p.m. VARIANCE _ SIDEYARD SETBACK ENCROACHMENT/R!chaed Beckes. 1~484 Jonquil StLeet NW ML. CaLlbeeg eev!ewed the backgeound and applicable oedinances foe the eequest of Richaed Beckes, 14484 Jonquil Steeet NW.. to allow the placement of a 8 x 12-foot stoeage shed enceoaching about 23 feet into the sideyaLd setback of 145th Avenue NW. The shed is alLeady up and was dlscove.ed by the Building Official. The sideyaed setback is 25 feet, and theLe is also a 45-foot dcainage easement in the back of the lot. Though the lot has its limitations, the Staff feels the shed can be placed along the nocth side of the gacage without eequieing a vaLiance. Because of that option and it can be consideeed an eye so.e in its peesent location, Staff eecommends denial, that it should be moved. Richaed Beckes - explained theee is a steep deop-off staeting almost immediately feom the back of the house. The shed cannot be moved to the south without encounteeing a peoblem with the slope. He even had to add some diet to caise one side about a foot to level the shed wheee it is now. It is sitting on timbees, but not fastened to the timbecs. He said he moved the shed as fae south as he could away feom the cucb and still be on a/Level paet of the yaed. He staeted the shed in Septembec. , ) '-~ Theee was a lengthy discussion on the eestLictions on the lot itself given the setback cequieements, deainage easement, and steep slope in the back yaed. Me. Beckes explained thece has nevec been any wate. in the dcainage easement in the thLee yeaes he's lived theee. as it all pools to the south. He couldn't put it in the d~ainage easement in the southwest coenee because that is wheee the play yaed is. and his wife Is a licensed daycaLe pcovidee. That is the most safe location foe the play yaed. Theee is also an apcon foe the sto.m watec dLainage feom the sUL~ounding aeea in his back yacd. ~ Planning and Zoning Commission January 22. 1991 - Minutes Page 5 <Variance-Sideyard Setback Encroachment/Richard Beckes, Continued) Mr. Beckes also stated that he did not want to put it beside the garage because he plans to add a third bay onto it in the near future. The shed does not interfere with any utilities, as the only line on that side of the street is North Central Cable TV, which is three to four feet behind the curb. The shed is 14 feet from the back of the curb. He did not need a permit to put up the shed, but did call City Hall asking about the requirements for its placement, giving his exact location, and was told by the office staff that he could place it ten feet from the back of the curb. It was only after it was brought to his attention did he realize the width of the easements across the lot. Mr. Carlberg stated that the future plans of the resident for the use of the property is not a reason for allowing the structure to remain where it is. The Commissioners debated the request. Chairperson Ferris suggested to prevent further misinformation from Staff, that such inquiries be directed to the people who are most qualified to answer them. Commissioner Pease acknowledged that there is a severe drop-off in the back of the lot, and it is very limited as to where the shed can be placed. Aesthetically, she had trouble seeing that the shed would be better next to the house rather than where it is. Discussion was on the various suggestions of where the shed could be located, though no other location seemed feasible other than next to the garage as suggested by Staff. The drawback to that location is Mr. Beckes' intention to add onto the garage. Several Commissioners were concerned about allowing the shed to be left in the setback. questioning its interference with snow removal and possible future construction of sidewalks. It was also commented that the intent of the setback is not to have protruding objects along the lot lines. Mr. Beckes again noted that because of the topography of the lot, he is very limited as to what he can do with it. He did not do this intentionally, as he did consider everything and did contact the City. Chairperson Ferris noted he is generally against granting variances, but felt this is one time that it may be warranted because it has a potential for a hardship. MOTION by Vistad, Seconded by Peek, recommend to the City Council denial of the variance request for Lot 9, Block 2, Creekridge Estates to put an 8x12'storage shed in the northeast corner of the lot. The storage shed encroaches on the 25 feet in the required sideyard setback along 145th Avenue. Referring to Ordinance 8, Section 6.02, establishing the setback requirements, sideyard setback is 25 feet. Referring to Ordinance 8, Section 5.04, establishing the criteria in granting a variance: ~ .-J Planning and Zoning Commission January 22, 1991 - Minutes Page 6 (Variance-Sideyard Setback Encroachment/Richard Beckes, Continued) (Motion continued) 1. Does the strict interpretation of the ordinance cause particular difficulities or unnecessary hardships to the property owners? I do not bel ieve the strict interpretation of this would because there are other alternatives on the lot to place it. 2. Is the hardship caused by the unique physical features of the land, including shape or condition of the parcel? I believe this also, where there is a area to place it on property on the side, does not apply. 3. Wil I the variance be detrimental to the public welfare? One reason for setbacks Is, as on 145th Avenue with the storage shed in its current placement, it would stand out a considerable amount from the other properties and be a very noticeable feature. 4. Is the variance necessary to al low the property owner the reasonable use of the property? I do not believe that it is denying him. He does have reasonable use of the property. DISCUSSION: The debate continued, some feeling the variance should be allowed because the lot is very restrictive as to where anything can be placed and that the topography of the lot is a severe problem relating to reasonable use of the property. Others argued that there are other alternatives that lessen the severity of the hardship or even comply with the ordinance. plus they were concerned about the severity of the setback encroachment. Given the strict interpretation of the ordinance, they felt the severity of the enroachment is a violation of that concept; and the future intentions of the property owner cannot be considered when granting a variance. Also, when building in a utility easement as in this case, the question is who is responsible if the .util ity company has to access at the location of the structure. Mr. Carlberg didn't think a structure could be located in a utility easement, and this is In the general util ity easement. Commissioner Vistad ADDED TO MOTION: encroachment into the utility easement of the structure because you are on the 35-foot setback. and the structure encroaches approximately 8 feet into the utility easement. Second Stands. FURTHER DISCUSSION: Mr. Beckes addressed Section 6.02 of Ordinance 8. The blue book given residents regarding sideyard setbacks needs to be clarified as to what point the setback is measured. The chart says sideyard setback from street, but it doesn't say where to start measuring. In his line of work. their reference point is always the center line of the adjacent roadWay. Using that point, he is we!1 within the minimum setback requirements. Though he now unde~stands, ~.) Planning and Zoning Commission Janua~y 22, 1991 - Minutes Page 7 ,~ (Va~lance-Sideya~d Setback Enc~oachment/Richa~d Beckes, Continued) the~e is nothing in the book that says to measu~e f~om the p~ope~ty line. He has discussed that with City Staff, and they a~e now awace of the p~oblem. M~. Ca~lbe~g ag~eed that is something that should be looked at, but hoped that ~esidents would call the City if the~e is any confusion. VOTE ON MOTION: Ca~~ied unanimously. Commissione~ Pease - Voted yes with ~ese~vation. It bothe~s me that it is in the utilIty easement. I think we should see if we can find some alte~native that Is not quite as ~est~lctlve based on topog~aphy. Chai~pe~son Fe~~is - I am conce~ned in voting yes in that I do believe the~e is some ~est~iction of the ~easonable use of the p~ope~ty. What conce~ns me the most is the enc~oachment into the easement and the ability to maintain that easement and to maintain the pu~pose to which cities give easements. I am a fi~m believe~ that the easements must ~emain clea~ so that the easement can be used. I am conce~ned about the magnitude of the enc~oachment into the sideya~d setback; 23 feet into a 25-foot setback is about as fa~ as you can enc~oach. Although I do unde~stand that the~e a~e ce~tain conditions on this p~ope~ty that make it impossible to move it 2, 3, 4, o~ 5 feet back fu~the~ and be able to do anything with it. I think the land Is ext~emely limited; and potential Iy the~e is some a~gument to the fact that in viewing the p~ope~ty befo~e pu~chasing it, one can easily asce~tain that it is limited in what you can do with it. M~. Beckes detected some conce~n when he mentioned the play ya~d is in the d~ainage easement, noting that it is allowed unde~ Section 4.06 of o~dinance 8. The Commission stated they did not have a conce~n with the placement of the play ya~d. The matte~ will go to the City Council on Feb~ua~y 19, 1991. OTHER BUSINESS M~. Ca~lbe~g ~epo~ted the Council Minutes ~eflect that the ~equest f~om Rosella Sonsteby fo~ municipal utilities is to be looked at when updating the City's Comp~ehensive Plan In te~ms of which inte~cepto~ is to be used. He stated it is to go to the Comp~ehensive Plan Task Fo~ce along wIth the othe~ ~equests fo~ thel~ conside~ation. M~. Ca~lbe~g ~epo~ted his findings at the county with ~ega~d to haza~dous waste and chemical disposal by businesses in the City. The county has hi~ed an additional pe~son fo~ this matte~, and he ~equested that the CIty and the Fi~e Depa~tment get copies of the . \ documentation of chemicals at the va~ious locations. He wil I do mo~e ,~ ~esea~ch on Title 3. ,.J CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION January 22, 1991 DATE AGENDA ITEM 5. Variance, Beckes 14484 Jonquil st. NW Sideyard Setback Encroachment ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT lanning ~ David L. carlberg By:Ci ty Planner APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: REQUEST The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review the request of Richard Beckes to allow for the placement of a shed encroaching into the sideyard setback of 145th Avenue NW. BACKGROUND The applicant has placed a 8' x 12' storage shed encroaching twenty-five (25) feet into the required sideyard setback along 145th Avenue NW. The shed has also been placed on a drainage and utility easement. APPLICABLE ORDINANCES Ordinance streets. District, 8, Section 6.02, establishes setback requirements along On a back to back lot in an R-4, Single Family Urban the sideyard setback is twenty-five (25) feet. Ordinance #8, Section 5.04 establishes the variance process and procedure. Section 5.04 allows the City to grant a variance to the requirements of the zoning Ordinance if the strict interpretation of the Ordinance will cause undue hardship to the property owner. The Planning and zoning Commission should review the request using the following criteria: 1. Does the strict interpretation of the Ordinance cause practical difficulties and/or unnecessary hardships to the property owners? The strict interpretation of the Ordinance does not cause practical difficulties and/or unnecessary hardships. '. --' 2. Is the hardship caused by the unique physical features of the land, including shape or condition of the parcel? The parcel has a forty-five (45) foot drainage easement in the rear yard. The topography of the rear yard does limit the property owner use of his rear yard. The existing location of the shed is the only place the shed could be located in the rear yard. In order to meet the setback requirements as defined in Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02, the shed must be placed along the north side of the garage. page Two Beckes Variance January 22, 1991 ,~ 3. will the variance be detrimental to the public welfare? The location of the shed could be considered an eye sore, being located so close to 145th Avenue NW. 4. Is the variance necessary to allow the property owner the reasonable use of the property? The property owner would not denied reasonable use of the property, because an alternative location for the storage shed exists. COMMISSION OPTIONS A. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend approval of the variance requested by Richard Beckes to allow for the placement of a 8' x 12' storage shed encroaching twenty-five (25) feet into the side yard setback of 145th Avenue NW on the property described as: Lot 9, Block 2, creekridge Estates (14484 Jonquil St. NW) The Planning Commission finds that the proposal meets the minimum criteria established in Ordinance 8, Section 5.04 including: the strict interpretation of the ordinance causes the hardship, the hardship stems from the unique shape, topography or physical features of the land, the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare and the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the property. B. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may recommend denial of the variance requested by Richard Beckes to allow for the placement of a 8' x 12' storage shed encroaching (25) feet into the sideyard setback of 145th Avenue NW on the property described as: Lot 9, Block 2, Creekridge Estates (14484 Jonquil st. NW) The Commission finds that the proposal does not meet the requirements set forth in the city's zoning Ordinance #8, Section 5.04. The Commission finds that no hardship due to the unique shape or topography of the parcel exists and that the land owner would not be precluded reasonable use of the property. C. The Andover Planning and zoning Commission may table the item. :_~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends option #B CAINE a ASSOCIATES LAND SURVEYORS, INC. /7720 Highway 65 N.E. Soderville, Minnesota 55304 434-7646 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: Carlson, Dropps, and Associates, Inc. ,J LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 9, Block 2, CREEKRIDGE ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota. ~ tt\ Q tc) /15 T/ / I / ~E /v-w <;) "" .J -", J 0 - 4: ~ .... tJ. 1 -ct) o,,~ Ji I 1 ~r I 1---- I " \:0' I 1/0 S 8905Z'/7"E ---/;!Z.50--- () lI\ . 6= -900 K-.. 0 - _ L" <0 O. 3"'"00 . .~-OO <;) ~ ~~ " I , -~--- I ~l , ~() '~\;) t-.. <;)~lf\ \)~ ~: I 4~ I I ~~! I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I I ~ ~ I I~ \i I, /0 I'7PRA/A/AG'c F U7/L.. '+~EASE'MeNr- ._ _ _ _ _ _ I I I _j/o ~ 10 ..../ r,'<lC'V'-;I\I':!Q I J " <t '2 1'- J c..l .J :2 ... do , I' -- -- - /42.50--- S8.9~52';7''E I _, "./ , ~ \ \ \ ~ , ~~ ~1'- ~~ :~ I I I + ~. 30 30 ~ 30 30 I HEREBY CERrlFY rHAr rHIS SIIRVEY, PLAN, OR REPORr WAS PREI'ARED BY AlE OIII.NDER MY DIREcr SIIPERVISION AND rHA r I AAI A DilLY REGISrERED LAND SIIRVErOR IINDER rHE LAWS OF rifE srArE OF AlINNE sorA. " ) SCALE" I INCH' ~ FEET. o DENorES Ih INCH IlrON I'II'E SET. . DENOTES 'OUND IlrON MONIIMENT. 'EARINas SHOWN AlrE ASSIII1IED. ~~ -n. q....": lloIrET u...I /j,J Iq~ REG. NO. I22SI , /"),.. 1-'" ",01 "..., ;i/t:<~ '~/cn~~~~~q]l-;":'O~~/ ~~\~~~;= -rr"iV\gJ~rf\ -, ~ -- :V~ _ \(/l"o '/~~ ~~)I'" ~~' '~)~,., ~rlv2- ?t ~I ~ I .) 'I/o - ., /" ~~ i., eE,t{,~ ~ I ~'\.,i~~~ - ./ r,' 'Vi' \ll · .' ( .0 "" " I fi~'..\ 'J.....-- t, t' 0 ~ .' ~( C:' \ 1.,1 "0[\1 '~I~/z/ 10-,;'0) ,"::. ,~, I ....~'< ~,--. -- ,\; .'io : ~ - ~"" ... ~ ",/:" ~ \' a. J; J J '\. . ," ,> ~ v~ ;, r- ~\ I l.{!:!' '\ ~ " ,11 '( tJ. / ", I I'\. -, "'lr! 91' \ I \ /- 1:.1 '. ) 7;'~ I ( /"O~, J , - ~I i\ ~ 1., .. :' . ~O \ I ! /l7~ ~'i ,(.J hi \V' ~ ~ \/ ' fJ Y I ,0. J I I ( J \ " ~ L \'\. ~ ,./ ,. ~ I ']~ //37. ("./ ,ll' !!~C./ ';:;lll~[:,--'i-~ \ ;\...... \ ei~ I, I ~ 1= . ~\ (.11.400) \,~ l~';',-,~ \., ,\ I : 'II'%. I::f'" ~ I: , . ~ ' '-" 1~~. I '."- I I~ O~ I ~~ i;' ~~. '~~~~,d.eO) ~ I d 11.5)) i! , .(~ ,R431 I I: J ,"'~ ." ) ~....\ /<I\~~St' :li /--'~. I I I\'} ~ ~~! 1/ ~.R-4 -" ~/ (, {~) ~ ~ 5~. 7 '\"- ":d) !I/'!jgj q / I ~ ~"t II ~ x... : (i.l.k- -~--r ~ ~ I ,~~C ~ \~~S()V~ \ _U.f', ~o:;" ~> --- ~\ - j': p;.,";~, . ~ " .L(.:4T)- ~ Xt:.7j,~ ~I- I lth8s:...1 : 1"'-- ;;r. m ,. ~ . ~~.;i1 /" /o1~'" l~.J.r'~ ~\'l'I\' P'l · A \ , //-"\,,0) I '<f ._ l' './, ~. I /~~ r-- - - \8~\ 1....- / , \ -\ & .(/~~~ I'. , ~-, "'-.....J." - ~l:,r I ~r_,\ 'il:1'\ 'Ii ,-..J/':Ui: .\:, . \ ( I ?4 1 . -:/" - _ D ~. " A v A:.1" " 'b .... ~ " ,- ,"\ ~!<, \0 \ .. J ~ ~, ~ ~ ./ . 'U1,ru." \~ i) r:- \o_~) . ~/\" ~ (V'~O)~ I'\,;;~'- 1 II _~ 111\. ~,\I~ ~I \) ~~ ",-:-) ,-' J-4J"~!.J. \\,~<<4< U\ 1\ \ 1\ I..>: . I ;:~: ~~-' -.; _~?:-:1.~"~ _._.:r~~ ,f;.-;;;,_~... \~ ' : . '. '.-. : -1-1 . ~ ~s.. 3~' (:/ -r;f11' l~ fS]fr ~ ~- 1~}l.JlltTIt) I., : : ~ (~ .<'1~..r~1 1\. . ~4i~! I.! \ .! I i,1 ..~ ~> .1~1 P'jijl'~: I C\J I;. ~ /~!':. . 'I") ., 'I . ')V,/ '/' ;; -, ~Z ;: I I, I ! :; 'I. it ~I - ~ . r- '43 I" ~4.J I ~-11 f ~l.iJ...l; r f-zr'- 7.:.;".:;~ uk\..- .(~~/ I./r "c, 1/0"/ t'l'l I ~\t\o~'.:l!V ~ (/~) I' (,r~!lJ ~ ' f ."<,~", I:j.\l) '" /.Ai. . 'tI \ l,,< J . I.. ",II Il\ ' "'<,j (7) ') 1 I (; " '+31.,/ / I //. !/ 'OJ ~l\,. 'I '. 'I '___~ 7-;' ,11''1., / I ~/.~i./H: :.~' ~B.. V '~".'L -- tr~'.r'~ . '~.i[, :/;/1., .~/,~;.,.: llK " . : ~ U{~O)) ~ (/~~~fvD (~}#'A) ~ ~. 7;f~t, ~ : I ) /~.k--J ~ '::;; O~' i ~y"~; IX!', . ..: 0, ~.I I I / \'1 f l.C r .1' ',,",, .~.: ~ B::""i.1 j __ . ~. I :I.'!\, ..>:I~-~~ ~';H~ '.: I/Mi, ~1.' \.-9? ~ -,... ~ ~-T"~...l.(/~. _ . (r~ -~, . J) If.~. ~ i..... .' I ;, . . I -', ~, f\ I" ' ,0' I , < " 1.,; ~;/,: ~ r-1 iv- ~'~I;~ : ~ I 71-5 ~ ' ': ~?9.-f. S' I., r\ ~-?c;o..' \ ~ (// 0) II ~ C\ ~ (/~.;#~) .; ~ ~ 1$/...1 r-' ~. ' .:.~, tJ: ~ ~ ~....< cr \\ '~. ' I ~ /--~ ~~ ~ / · 7 I) I ^ -"~.J'\~' /4. It'-"""./ IbW"I; ~""""7r.~ \ ~,~. ~~t " "...?~ - ~ \. :; gl;!Jl ~~ ;-5/,,/.~ '. i! g- / ~~..ft ~ r ~')~ " -1 ' ~-"""1.J ..............__ ....\._~.. ~: (//)1 ~ ~//;...~) 11J' :-. 1 , . " 'I "r / '': --: , - \. U{ ~ c;,.:J : I ; . j #- '~') )\ /4k~ ~ 810 V I tY ,1,,, ,:-.....; li..,o~ -'-~~' ~L - ." ""PU ~ i/i I., r ,'i ;;;' TS.7L t>~ . bb ~ ~:','~~~~'''j -1~ ~ U/W ~JJkJ ~\ ~) \ /. ~...ff~ '" \ -A~ r!'~ '\ /,. ~ r -,.'.; Xi; .r I: /, ( '~~ .~~~".. \ I~~';;I ""6~(/rll' C' f.4fE.f!:l~T_V. ~ ,'\-j.'.tn ~87:::'4. t'rIf? :- IJ.,~~.",:.J 0 ~1 ~Q} .t:I~,l.8 t;~';' '. . ..... '_. ,t, "".", " ,./ I j' Y, -, ,_.i '._ ..,,,>.::---. .""''-.J' ___..._., I; :. . ~ '6. _ -". . :.~..., ~...... '\.. ... LL u: ~ I~ 0.. ~ ~ S?'lI) I , 1., ~ \,,1) r ~ I CITY of ANDOVER 1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100 Property Address VARIANCE REQUEST FORM 14424 JOUQWIl_ ST. Nw Legal Description of Property: (Fill in whichever is apporpriate): Lot q Block z Addi tion C 2.ec.t:::.iZ.I1;;)~E. E.~\~ .-e..~ Plat Parcel PIN (If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal) ********************************************************************* Description of Request 0/ _ u, I 8> 'I.' Z. ~TO-eAC::.E. ~ I-l c'D I /'oJ "1"1-l t:. NO~\"I-\ LUE.~\ Cr..., ~ W \- iZ.. 01= La!. WIL.L. ~ 1-0CA""\"E: D OlJ D"'2A \ tJ A~E. E..A:::'E.rvlE..lo-l, l; W I"'T"I-\ \ u ~ I ~E.. Y A '2b ~Er~ 'C.'?- ~U\ 'ZCt--1C/'UI. Specific Hardship -r.;-;::>OGt=.A?\-\ 'r' ~.N id C.CtJ .....-uu iZ. 01= L.OT ~-n:: I C.T "-I UM ~i2. 01= ?LAc..c~ LU\-\ E.~ ~l-lE.D CAu ~E. ,?U.\c..e.D. (O'lc~~\ Current Zoning ~-4 Section of Ordinance 1.&,.02.. ********************************************************************* Name of Applicant '"2.1c...l/:~~:D G. Z: JOo..JQU\1... s-r. NW Jo t\ IoJ I.lc D. BE.c..~~ Home phone J44'34 4Z.Z -qZ~5 Address Business Phone 5'1/ - '1 5'0 z... Signature Date ********************************************************************* / Property Owner (Fee Owner) (If different from above) Address Home Phone ,,) Signature Business Phone Date ******************************************************+******+.****** 5?E.C'l=-'C I-L~ 'i:'D ~I-\ \? / ) . \.COtUT. _ --r:.r::... Or-...! L~ OII-I>=:iC:. LOGAT"IOu - ""TO II-Hz... GA~A<::::'E:.... /HI~ wOULU '- }j(?AN ~ lCt--l ?LA tJ~ . :c \= 0-;:::' ~ \-\ e.. \::> -g. c.~ T'j2..1 C. I l~ Nc)(,T FLJ..0~ rvt'T' Ii-I I 'Zu 'QA"1" TO t-Uc>uLW LI ~\"::. "-0 ADD A 11-1 r::. GtA ~AC::rr::.. , A L ~ M'-r' ?L.A tJ~ A l;;>E.c..r;::. 0 F FIl-l \::.. 9A c. iC.. 0 r- T1-1 C A 'e\"::. --r-D !.2>1..J1L'D GA i::A G F . --"/74 c.. ~ I-l e:. i:::l lAJ A ~ A L ~ ? \... A c..E.. \:) V....H-U:: ~C:.. 1/ )~ I ~A~c.\;) ot\J 1t\J FOj::MA TIOr-.J <SIVEl\.J .0 fv\r::. i:;>'-r' A t\J E Ivt'?LO Y E r- O~ Tl-I t... c.1-rY I ~ 'Ou I L-W\ t....l C=t "UE..?A c-revlENI T wA~ TCLD "'-~Ir- c..ouLu cE- ?LA Ceb 10 FE-cl Fi:::.e>tv\ dF c.wr::e,. ~~c.i:::> ,1.-1 c.. BA c..~ ,J ,~ VARIANCE PAGE 2 The following information shall be submitted prior to review by the City of Andover: 1. A scaled drawing of the property and structures affected showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures within 100 feet. 2. Application Fee: (jLingle Family - $50;]]) -Other ~equ~ts - $7~.00 Date Paid V7AI I '3~888 Receipt it CRITERIA FOR GRANTING A VARIANCE In granting a variance, the city Council shall consider the advice and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and: 1. If the City Council finds that the request if it will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this Ordinance. 2. If it finds that strict enforcement of this Ordinance will cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. 3. If it finds that denying the request does not deny reasonable use of the property. 4. Economic considerations shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of the Ordinance. \ ) '\ -J , ~. ~,~'" (5) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 19, 1991 BY: V. VOlk\t' OR AGENDA SECTION, l' tems NO. D1Scuss1on ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. tf. Admin. 1 Downtown Merchants The merchants from the Downtown Center and J. T. Mega and Associates have asked to speak to the Council regarding the city's participation in the annual City Celebration. Representatives from these groups will be present at the meeting. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY -;'''-~ "'/'~~"':"'-~''--~!'l>.. i':'~/"\ G ~ ) lJ "" --'l\'",,,,,,,,,..,,.,",,,,,it',.l CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 19, 1991 ITEM Adopt Fund Balance NO. l' s: Po lCY Howard D. KOOlick~ BY: Finance Director AGENDA .SECTIO~ NQD1Scusslon Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Finance REQUEST The Andover city Council is requested to review and provide direction regarding the attached policy relating to reservations and designations of year end fund balances. BACKGROUND The City maintains a number of funds, each with a different purpose and legal requirement. Designations and reservations of year end fund balance are used to segregate spendable resources from non-spendable resources. Reservations of fund balance are used to show the portion of the fund balance whose use is legally restricted. Examples of fund balance reservations include "Reserved for Debt Service" and "Reserved for Encumbrances". These two accounts would show the portion of the fund balance legal restricted for debt service payment and fund balance obligated for payment upon completion of a contract, respectively. Designations of fund balance are used to show tentative plans for the future use of resources. These plans are subject to change and are not legal requirements. Examples of fund balance designations include "Designated for Equipment purchases" and "Designated for Compensated Absences". These two accounts show the portion of the fund balance intended to be used for equipment acquisition and payment of vacation and sick leave, respectively. COUNCIL ACTION \ '---- ) MOTION BY TO SECOND BY " '-J The purpose of the implementing a fund balance policy at this point is two-fold. First, good financial management dictates providing readers of the City's financial statements with as much detailed information as possible. Reserving and designating fund balance amounts provides details relating to a funds use and the Council's future intentions regarding that fund. The second reason for implementing a fund balance policy is to clarify for the state the true financial condition of the City. The state views unreserved and undesignated fund balance amounts as excess cash the City is holding. The legislature, as well as others, do not appear to understand the tax and state aid payment policies and how they affect the City. To be more specific, they do not understand that cities receive one-half of their tax and state aid revenues in July and December and that the December payment must last the City until the July payment comes. In addition, the state makes calculations using unreserved and undesignated fund balances from all funds to prepare a variety of statistical comparisons. Designating and reserving fund balances will provide the state with more accurate information with which to compare the City against others. The state may use this type of data to make future state aid cuts, based on the theory that undesignated and unreserved fund balances are excess cash that the City does not need. CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS 1. Adopt the policy as presented by approving the resolution. 2. Amend the policy and adopt the resolution. 3. Request changes to the policy be made and it be represented to Council at the next meeting. 4. Decide that no policy is needed and have the Finance Director present recommendations each year. 5. Decline to set a policy and continue to show amounts as unreserved and undesignated, unless reservations are warranted by legal requirements. 6. Other options as City Council may deem appropriate. , ,~~ \ ,~ CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -91 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A POLICY REGARDING DESIGNATIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF YEAR END FUND BALANCE AMOUNTS. WHEREAS, the City of Andover believes that good financial management and reporting dictates providing readers of the City's financial statements with as much detailed information as possible; and WHEREAS, designations and reservations of year end fund balance provide information regarding the legally restricted use of some funds and City Council intent regarding others; and WHEREAS, the City of Andover currently has no policy regarding reservations and designations of year end fund balance amounts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby establishes and adopts the "policy of Reservations and Designations of Year End Fund Balances", a copy of which is attached to this resolution, effective for the year ended December 31, 1990. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this ay of February ,1991. 19th CITY OF ANDOVER Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor ATTEST: Victoria Volk - City Clerk , , ~) " ,,~ CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA POLICY ON RESERVATIONS AND DESIGNATIONS OF YEAR END FUND BALANCES Adopted by the Andover City Council on the 19th day of February, 1991 \ '-~ '\ '-~ '\ '- ) CITY OF ANDOVER, MINNESOTA POLICY ON RESERVATIONS AND DESIGNATIONS OF YEAR END FUND BALANCES Table of Contents purpose of Policy Page 1 ................................... . Responsibility for Management of Policy ................1 Defini tions ............................................1 Policy No.1 - Fund Balance Designations for the General Fund ....................2 Policy No. 2 - Fund Balance Designations for Special Revenue Funds ...............3 Policy No. 3 - Fund Balance Reservations for Debt Service Funds ........ ..........4 Policy No. 4 - Fund Balance De~ignations for Capital project Funds .............5-6 '\ ,-~ PURPOSE OF POLICY This policy is designed to provide for the City of Andover continuing and consistent guidelines for recording designations and reservations of fund balance amounts. RESPONSIBILITY FOR MANAGEMENT OF POLICY The Finance Director is charged with ensuring the City's financial statements are in compliance with this policy. In the Finance Director's absence, compliance shall be the responsibility of the Treasurer or Acting Finance Director. The City Council, based on recommendations from the Finance Director, shall amend this policy as conditions warrant. DEFINITIONS 1. Fund Balance - The excess of the assets of a fund over its liabilities or the cumulative difference of all revenues and expenditures from the fund's creation. 2. Reserved Fund Balance - The portion of a fund's fund balance that is legally restricted in use. 3. Designated Fund Balance - The portion of a fund's fund balance that the City Council has set aside for a future intended use. 4. Fund Balance-Reserved for Debt Service - An account used to segregate the portion of f~nd balance which is legally restricted to the payment of bond principal, interest and fees. 5. 6. Unreserved Fund Balance-Desi nated for Ca ital account use to segregate t e portlon 0 un future use is anticipated to be related to the of capital projects. - An 7. Unreserved Fund Balance-Desi An account use to segregate t e portlon 0 un a ance to allow for a sufficient amount of cash to be available to meet operating expenditures between the beginning of the year and the receipt of major revenue items. 8. Unreserved, Undesi nated Fund Balance - An account used to s ow t e remalnlng amount 0 unreserved fund balance after all '\ designations have been made. '- ) -1- ) Policy No. 1 - Fund Balance Designations for the General Fund I. POLICY within the General Fund, the following classifications of unreserved fund balance shall be used: Designated for working Capital Designated for Equipment undesignated II. PROVISIONS A. The Designated for Working Capital account shall be set equal to 33 1/3 percent (33.33%) of the subsequent year's budgeted general fund expenditures. 1. This percentage approximates, based on the three year period of 1988-1990, the excess expenditures over revenues for the first six months of the year; the period until tax and state aid monies are received. B. The Designated for Equipment account shall be used to account for any general fund monies which the City Council earmarks for the purchase of equipment in a subsequent year. C. The undesignated account shall be used to account for the remainder of the Fund Balance after recording all designations and reservations. If there are not adequate funds for all reservations and designations, then the balance in the undesignated account shall be zero. D. The designations shall be made in the order listed above. In the event there are not sufficient funds to make all designations, then they shall be made in the following order to the extent possible: Designated for working Capital Designated for Equipment , ; ~~ -2- \ 'J \ -'-) policy No. 2 - Fund Balance Designations for Special Revenue Funds I. POLICY Special Revenue Funds shall use the following classifications of unreserved fund balance: undesignated II. PROVISIONS A. The undesignated account shall be used to account for all fund balance amounts, whether they are positive or negative. -3- '-) '-~) Policy No. 3 - Fund Balance Reservations for Debt Service Funds I. POLICY All positive fund balances in Debt Service Funds shall be shown as Fund Balance-Reserved for Debt Service. Any deficit fund balances shall be shown as Unreserved, Undesignated Fund Balance. II. PROVISIONS A. Bonds issued by the City have specific revenue sources pledged for repayment, including assessments levied against benefited properties, interest earnings, assessments for trunk charges and other sources as outlined by the bond documents. These documents establish the legal restrictions on the use of these funds. B. Those Debt Service Funds with deficit balances cannot have reserved fund balances. Accounting terminology and practice gives no meaning to a negative reserved amount. _11_ :) Policy No.4 - Fund Balance Designations for Capital project Funds I. POLICY Capital project Funds shall use the following classifications of unreserved fund balance: Designated for Equipment Designated for capital Projects Designated for Park Improvements undesignated II. PROVISIONS A. The Designated for Equipment account shall be used in the following manners: 1. within the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund (PIR Fund), the amount included as designated for equipment shall equal all amounts deposited into the Capital Improvement Account by City Council resolution plus interest earned on these funds. 2. within any fund created to account for the use of proceeds of Certificates of Indebtedness, the entire fund balance shall be classified as designated for equipment, since this type of debt can only be used to finance equipment purchases. 3. Within any fund created to account for the use of proceeds of general obligation bonds, the portion of the bond issue anticipated to be spent on equipment shall be classified as designated for equipment. During the life of this type of fund, the amount classified under this section shall be decreased by purchases made during the year. B. The Designated for Capital projects account shall be used in the following manners: 1. Within/the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund (PIR Fund), the amount included as designated for capital projects accounts shall equal all amounts deposited into the Public Improvement Account by City Council resolution plus interest earned on these funds. \ .J -5- , \ ,J 2. Within any fund created to account for the use of proceeds of general obligation bonds, the entire fund balance, less any amounts classified as designated for equipment shall be classified as designated for capital projects. C. The Designated for park Improvements account shall be used in the Park Dedication Fund. The entire fund balance shall be shown as designated for park improvements since the only revenue sources in this fund are park dedication fees and interest earned on them. D. The undesignated account shall be used for any capital project fund with a deficit fund balance. \ \.) -h- l~fr. 'c"~""""'\""\ /:l' '~ii" Di ~) \ .} - ~ . '",~/1 -"~_~~~"",,_jf;",,,,"'..yod!' CITY OF ANDOVER AGENDA SECTION NO. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION February 19, 1991 DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Discussion Items Engineering ;t(? ITEM NO. lo. Approve 1991 MSA street Construction BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to review and approve the 1991 MSA street construction for the coming year and to hold informational meetings for reconstructing various city streets as recommended by the Road Committee which met February 7th. 1. The Road Committee recommended the following streets be constructed: - Crosstown Drive between Bunker Lake Boulevard and Crosstown Boulevard (designated in 1990). This section is deficient in cross section, drainage and contains a number of potholes which are continuously repaired by Public Works. Approximate reconstruction cost - $144,000. - Crooked Lake Boulevard south of Bunker Lake Boulevard to the Coon Rapids border along with construction of sidewalks. Sidewalks would be eligible using MSA funds. Reconstruction cost - $200,000. NOTE: A. The Road Committee reviewed the possibility of University Avenue from 151st Avenue to 157th Avenue (Andover would be responsible to implement any required feasibility reports through construction phase) and from 157th Avenue to Constance Boulevard (Ham Lake would be responsible to implement any required feasibility reports through construction phase) to be constructed. In reviewing the previous City Council Minutes of August 1990, the minutes only reflect asking the Road Committee to review this. In April 1989, the City Council approved a five year MSA street Improvement Program which includes the construction of University Avenue north and south of 157th Avenue in 1991. See attached. Total cost for construction north - south is $350,000. continued COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY ,) Page Two February 19, 1991 Approve 1991 MSA street Construction B. The Road Committee also discussed the possible construction of a road serving Fire Station *2. The concern the Road Committee has is the existing alignment already serves the area to allow for fire truck movements on the west side. By constructing 165th Avenue from County Road 58 to Round Lake, it would really be only serving the Fire Department. The majority of traffic movement in Andover is north-south. For informational purposes, $500,000 is available for 1991 construction plus another $200,000 in Andovers MSA account for maintenance and construction of MSA streets. This account is used to balance the construction projects where the City Council doesn't assess. 2. The Road Committee recommended holding an informational meeting for reconstruction of streets in the following areas: - Lakeridge - Rum River Forest - Njordmark Dale A majority of the streets in these areas would be very costly and time consuming to repair. Attached is a summary of the cost estimates for the street improvements. By holding the informational hearing, the Road Committee would be able to explain the reasoning of the improvement and what could happen if these streets are not reconstructed. If the residents favor the improvement the City Council would hold a public hearing for the improvement soon thereafter. 3. Other discussions with Road Committee. The Road Committee was presented with 5 roads recommended by staff to be designated as minumim maintenance roads. - Jivaro Street north of the intersection of County Road 58 and CSAH7 - Xeon street north of Andover Boulevard - University Avenue Ext. north of Crosstown Boulevard - 149th Avenue NW east side of Round Lake Boulevard '- ) currently, the City maintains these roads, grading in the summer and snowplowing in the winter. Attached is information what is considered minumim maintenance road in the State Statue. , " "---' AGENDA SECTION NO. ,~ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL AcrION DATE April 4, 1989 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering APPR.Q.l,(Ed:,\OR AG~f.lDJ / I \ "'7 j ) BY: \..J / ITEM NO. Discussion Items 'i . MSA 5-Year Construction Program ~~ BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to review and approve the Five Year MSA Construction Program as this is a requirement per resolution from MNDOT. The information submitted to MNDOT is valuable to the Unencumbered Construction Fund Subcommittee as well as to the City Engineers in making city councils more aware of state Aid Funding. The Five Year program proposal would be as follows: 1989 I ,\~ a. ;0" V"1i~ b . tl~c. ~~ ' 90t!~ d. ./ 1990 YSS!I a. ()".... , ,'~ b. \)0';- / MOTION BY '"---,, TO university Avenue between 163rd Avenue NW and 166th Avenue NW (new construction with the City of Ham Lake). Prairie Road between Andover Boulevard and 157th Avenue NW (overlay). Ward Lake Drive between Crosstown Boulevard and 172nd Avenue NW (new construction). Tulip street NW between 169th Avenue NW to 170th Avenue NW (new construction). university Avenue between 157th Avenue NW to 163rd Avenue NW (new construction with the City of Ham Lake). 133rd Avenue NW between Jay Street NW and Hanson Boulevard (new construction with the City of Coon Rapids). COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY ~,j Page Two MSA 5-Year Construction program 1991 a. University Avenue between 151st Avenue NW to 157th Avenue NW (new construction with the City of Ham Lake). .. b. C. 1992 151st Avenue NW from Crosstown Boulevard to Round Lake Boulevard (new construction). i.^1'\1'V~(""",? A",c.. w~ 15'7rl... 4v~'\.{e.. +0 1'3(J. A",_~. a. 167th Avenue NW between verdin Street NW and Hanson Boulevard (new construction). 1993 a. 168th Lane NW between Round Lake Boulevard and Verdin Street NW (new construction). The City Council is requested to discuss the construction of 165th Avenue from Valley Drive to Round Lake Boulevard. The City Council has authorized the acquisition of right-of-way. puring the past few months, the Fire Department has been discussing possible locations for the Fire Stations. At this time, a location has not been decided on. The proposed 165th Avenue may not warrant construction until fire station locations are decided on. If the City is serious about building 151st Avenue between Crosstown Boulevard onto Round Lake Boulevard, the street would provide a good east-west route through Andover. See attached. This proposed route will help eliminate the jog of County Road 20 between CSAH 7 and Round Lake Boulevard. The estimated 1989 cost for construction of the project (165th Avenue) from Valley Drive to Round Lake Boulevard is $686,000. The 5-Year Construction Program as presented is not cast in concrete. ,j o Regula~ City Council Meeting Minutes - Ap~il 4, 1989 Page 8 (Awa~d Quotes/No~thwoods Tennis Cou~t, Continued) MOTION by O~ttel, Seconded by Knight, that the Council autho~ize ~econst~uction of the No~thwoods tennis cou~t and awa~d the bid based on bid Alte~ate B to Bu~t K~aabel Const~uction in the amount of $37,433.35, and autho~lze an expenditu~e of not to exceed $1,800 fo~ the ~emoval and ~eplacement and ~epai~ of the tennis cou~t fence. Motion ca~~ied unanimously. PARK BOARD/ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENT Chal~man McMul len ~epo~ted one of the Commissione~s has had six unexcused absenses and has stated he may ~esign but has not yet done so. The O~dlnance notes a Commisslone~ cannot have mo~e than th~ee unexcuted meetings, but 'it does not give specific guidelines as to the p~ocedu~e once those meetings a~e missed. He asked fo~ di~ection f~om the Council. Council felt the O~dinance should be amended to include the same p~ocedu~e as is spelled out fo~ unexcused absenses on the Planning Commission. In the meantime, Chai~man McMullen was advised to send a lette~ to the Commissione~ in question. 'Jt MSA FIVE-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM' Council discussed the Five-Yea~ MSA Street Improvement Program as p~oposed by the Road Committee. Mr. Schrantz explained the county is planning to reconstruct the cu~ves on Constance in 1990 so the ~oad wi II be shifted to the south. The county will then construct that po~tion of University Avenue from the new Constance north to the existing Constance. After discussing the proposal to construct University Avenue between 157th and 163rd in 1990, it was noted the residents in that area are opposed to puttIng University through to Constance. Also, last year the intent was not to put it through because there is no demand for it. It was then agreed to move this proposal to Item c in 1991. Councilmember Orttel also questioned Item b In 1991, 151st Avenue from Crosstown to Round Lake, thinking it is costly, unnecessary and not feasibl e.. Staff noted there is not enough MSA funds to sat isfy all the proposals and that changes can be made in the future. ,J MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Knight, that the City Council app~ove the Five-Yea~ MSA Const~uction P~ogram as presented, with one change: take 1990, a. and move it to 1991, c. (Unives~ity Avenue between 157th Avenue and 163rd Avenue). DISCUSSION: Mayor Elling stated the Fire Department is looking at different locations for a . . ~) Regula~ City Council Meeting Minutes - April 4, 1989 Page 9 <MSA Five-Year Construction Program, Continued) northwest station, now leaning toward somewhere on Round Lake Boulevard. Councllmember Orttel thought It made more sense to have a northerly cross in the area of 165th than to put 151st through the sod fields. . VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Elling, Jacobson, Knight, Perry; NO-Orttel because he didn't feel the 151st location is feasible. Motion carried. APPROVE PLANS AND SPECS/88-1/CROSSTOWN BRIDGE MOTION by Knight, Seconded by Jacobson, a Resolution as presented <See Resolution R058-89 approving final plans and specificatIons and ordering advertisement for bids for Project 88-1, Crosstown Boulevard bridge construction) DISCUSSION: Councilmember Orttel stated he will vote yes to obtain bids but will vote no on awarding the project unless something is negotiated with the county regarding the amount of overhead they contribute on joint projects. Motion carried unanimously. MEYER'S DRIVEWAY Mr. Rodeberg explained he has talked wIth Mr. and Mrs. Meyer, noting there are some legitimate concerns which they are having corrected. However, their complaint is the problem is due to the construction of the road, and both TKDA and the county disagree with that. The sOdding problem will betaken care of this spring. There is also a bump in the boulevard that should not be, and the Meyers have been told the contractor wil I come back to fix that. The contractor has not been given the final payment until these problems are corrected. Mr. Rodeberg also stated TKDA and the county are writing a Joint letter to the Meyers outlinIng the complaInts and what Is beIng done. No CouncIl action was taken at this time. APPROVE PLANS AND SPECS/89-4/RED OAKS 6TH MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Orttel, the ResolutIon as presented. <See ResolutIon R059-89 approvIng final plans and specs and orderIng advertisement for bids for Project 89-4, Red Oaks 6th for watermaIn, sanItary sewer, storm drain and streets with concrete curb and gutter) MotIon carrIed unanImously. ,J ~-t' o .w -. 1\]1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Octo G. Bonewoo. PE. Rooert W Rosene. fiE. Josepn C. N1derlik. p,e. Rienaf'd e. Tumer. PE. J~ C. Olson. P_E. Glenn It COOk. PE. Them,1S e. NO)'6 PE. _ Go Sc/1ynoCtlC. PE. M~ L Sotv~. F_E. ~th A. Cotdon. PE. Rknal'tJ W. Fo~ PE. Donald C. 8urgaR1t PE. Jmy A. Bourdon. PE. ~nc A. Hanson. P:E. Ted It F"retd. p.e. MiCh~ T. R.JuanaM. P_E. Rooett R. Pfelfene.. FE. O~ a lDsXoa. PE. TI"IorNs VI. Peterson. P.E. MId'l,)el C. Lyncn. P.E. Ja~s R. M.aland. PE. K,e,...necn p. ~. P,E. Mark R. Roltl. FE. Rooelt C. RuSSC'k. ....IA Thomas e. ^"'9Us. PE. How'artl ^ ~nfottt P'E. Oanlel J. EdgertOn. p.e. MMk A. SeIP. p.e. pr"ulip J. C.S'Aofl. FE. Mark O. \.Valbs. P.E. Th~sR.~~.^J~. G.ry F. ~naer. PE. Miles a Jensen. P_E. L PhIlip ~ III, PE. 0w1es A. Enckson ~M.P~ Hatl~ M. Olson Su:un M. Eberlin. C.P A Engineers & Architects March 30, 1990 Mr. James Schrantz City Administrator City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Boulevard NW Andover, Minnesota 55304 Re: Rum River Forest Area Street Improvements Project No. 89-19 Our File No. 17141 Lakeridge Area Street Improvements Project No. 89-Z6 Our File No. 17135 Dear Jim: (-" c..-fi s e :-.::'Q't;'7:B.b. lit P r <1'l:YO ~j h I:: ;~- r::':. :0 'I e..' ~.- ~-. ~ E.:" ~ ,-' ':7 L. ': II fr('---'-=-~"_::'-llJ;~ ' 1 ~, ::. :~.~ 6 ]COO i' ~ ' .... t: ..)..-/;. CITY OF ANDC'!ER The follo....ing is a summary of the cost for street improvements in the Rum River cost estimates include a 5 percent engineering and administration and 5 interest. estimates for five different alternates Forest and Lakeridge Additions. The contingency; 18 percent for legal, percent for bonding and ca?itali~ed Rum River Forest Addition: The follo....ing costs reflect price reduction from the original report cost estimates. costs are common excavation ....ith 6 inches Class 5 base for feet of road sub grade stabilization. a 10 percent unit Included in the approximately 700 Alternate A B C D E ill. 1 l/Z' 1 l/Z' Z' 3' Z' Description Option I Option II Complete Complete Milling Est. Project Cost $133,990 97,430 lZ7,560 161,180 118,450 Cost/Unit (3Z Units) $4,190 3,050 3,990 5,040 3.700 Lakeridge Addition: The follo....ing Addition. The costs also reflect original report cost estimates. costs exclude the Lakeside Estates a 10 percent unit price reduction from the , , ) Alternate A B C D E Bit. 1 l/Z' 1 l/Z' Z' 3' Z' Description Option I Option II Complete Complete Milling Est. Project Cost $215,920 161,130 Z5Z,590 3Z3,050 2Z6,320 Cost/Unit (73 Units) $Z,960 2,Z10 3,460 4.430 3,100 Page 1 2335 West Highway 36 · St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 . 612-636-4600 ,'-'" ( .- o Alternates A and B are described in detail in the tyO reports. They include varying degrees of patching, crack sealing and geotextile paving fabric to seal and reinforce the existing bituminous pavement. Alternates C and D are option to remove and dispose of the existing bituminous pavement and placement of 2 inches of Class 5 aggregate base. before paving. Alternate E is an option to mill the existing bituminous pavement. yill crush the bituminous and mix it yith the existing base materials. yill be done after the base is shaped and compacted. Milling Paving All five alternatives include driveyay and shoulder restoration. Ve recommend Alternate A based on our opinion that it is the most cost efficient. This option is designed to give the roadyay an estimated life of 15 to 20 years. Alternate E would also provide a project life of 15 to 20 years compar~ble to Alte~ate A. The advantage of Alternat.e A is that in areas yhere the pavement is in fairly good shape the pavement life could be 20 to 30 years. It is expected that Alternate A yould require more crack sealing maintenance than Alternate E as the existing pavement cracks yould reflect to the surface. Alternate B is designed to give the roadyay an estimated life of 5 to 10 years. Ve yould be this letter. pleased to meet yith the City Council to reviey the contents of If you have any questions please contact me at this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. '/7 .4 +/ j}~,-" :D. jJ-i~k---r-. ShaYn D. Gustafson SDG:dh Page 2 Ll/77 -,J 160.09 ROADS, GENERAL PROVISIONS 3784 160.09 CHANGE OF ROAD BY COUNTY OR TOWN BOARD. Subdivision I. Change in location. When the road authority of a county or town changes the location of a highway or road under its jurisdiction, the old road shall remain open until the new road is opened for travel. The old road or any portion thereof shall not revert to the abutting owners until vacated by the road authority in accordance with the law. Subd. 2. Old roads to remain open. When the new road does not provide access to property whose only means of access was the old road, then and in that event, the portion of the old road providing the access shall remain open for travel and shall be maintained by the county or town road authority until other means of access are provided after which it may be vacated as provided by law. Subd. 3. Not to be vacated in certain cases. When a county highway or town road is the only means of access to any property or properties containing an area or combined area of five acres or more, the highway or road shall not be vacated without the consent of the property owner unless other means of access are provided. History: 1959 c 500 art 1 s 9 ~ 160.091 MS 1957 [Repealed, 1959 c 500 art 6 s 13] 160.095 DESIGNATION OF MINIMUM-MAINTENANCE ROADS. Subdivision 1. Resolution. A road authority,other than the commissioner, may by resolution designate a road under its jurisdiction as a minimum-maintenance road ifit determines that the road or road segment is used only occasionally or intermittently for passenger and commercial travel. The resolution must identify the beginning and end points of the road being designated. After adopting the resolution, the road authority must post signs on the road to notify the motoring public that it is a minimum-maintenance road and that the public travels on the road at its own risk. A road authority must notify the road authorities of adjoining jurisdictions of designa- tions under this section. If an affected road or road segment runs along a county or town line, the designa- tion applies only to that part of the road that is under the jurisdiction of the road authority adopting the resolution.:. " Subd. 2. Signs. Designation of a minimum-maintenance road is effective on the erection of the signs required under this section. The signs shall be posted at entry points to and at regular intervals along a minimum-maintenance road. . Signs posted must conform to the commissioner's manual of uniform traffic devices. - Properly posted signs are prima facie evidence that adequate notice of a minimum-maintenance road has been given to the motoring public. Subd. 3. Limitations. A trunk highway may not be "designated as a minimum- maintenance road. A road may not be designated a minimum-maintenance road if federal-state aid to Minnesota will be reduced as a result. A road authority may not acquire additional right-of-way or easement by eminent domain or otherwise without the consent of the landowner, for the purpose of constructing or designating a mini- mum-maintenance road; except where necessary for drainage or public safety. Subd. 4. Liability. A minimum-maintenance road may be maintained at a level less than the minimum maintenance standards required for state-aid highways, roads; and streets, but must be maintained at the level required to serve the occasional or intermittent traflic. Where a road has been designated by resolution as a minimum- maintenance road and signs have been posted under subdivision 2, the road authority with jurisdiction over the road, and its officers and employees, are exempt from liability for any tort claim for injury to person or property arising from travel on the minimum- maintenance road and related to its maintenance or condition. Nothing in this section shall exempt a road authority from its duty to maintain bridges under chapter 165 or other applicable law. History: 1985 c 215 s 3 .~ .....-:, .-""."':~:~i.""""~,,,> CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 19, 1991 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT AGENDA SECTION NO. ITEM NO. 7. Items Andover Review Committee , Addi tion - ~? BY: The City Council is requested to review the proposed sketch plan of Indian Meadows 4th, 5th and 6th Additions as proposed by New Generation Homes. The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the sketch plan and their comments are as follows: General Comments * The proposed sketch plan is located in a R-1 zoning District, Single-Family Rural. The minimum lot size is 2.5 acres. Approximately 26 residential lots are being proposed. * Lot 8 of Block 3 and Lot 1 of Block 4 are required to access the city streets. * All cul-de-sac lots will be required to meet that section of Ordinance 10 Section 9.06 a(3) which indicates the width at the setback line is to be a minimum of 160 feet. It appears that these lots may need to be readjusted to meet this section of the Ordinance. * The area shown in green is dedication for park purposes. The area shown in red was included as part of the original Andover West preliminary and has been sold off by New Generation Homes. Areas adjacent to the orange, blue, and green areas are either platted or are not in ownership of New Generation Homes. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY TO SECOND BY ~) * The ARC discussed in length the location of the proposed cul-de-sacs. A. The proposed cul-de-sacs east of Eldorado street NW on 153rd Avenue and south of 155th Avenue on Blackfoot street NW are shown to be acceptable due to topography and the poor soil conditions that exist between the two proposed cul-de-sacs. B. The area shown in blue is in the process of being sold off. The concern the ARC has is that Hopi street has been constructed to the north property line of the area shown in blue. If and when that property develops, should Hopi street be extended over to Eldorado street? It is recommended that Hopi street should be constructed with a cul-de-sac to allow for better snowplowing operations and emergency vehicle turnaround. * The developer will be required to meet city Ordinances 8 and 10 and all other applicable ordinances. Planning and zoning Commission Comments The Planning and zoning Commission reviewed the sketch plan and agrees with comments prepared by the Andover Review Committee. Under Item B, the Commission would like to see 153rd Avenue cul-de-sac west of Eldorado streets extended to the property line to allow for future extension which would connect to Hopi street. \ I , / - 'J jf R-2~ . III ,~'; "f I---c' __ __. _ =I' .;,-' -- _ II _, __ -~ It':'' \ ~~rER:O--l- -- -, ~ _____.__ n_ .'""'?,.......::r ":~GIII':=: 1,1 L~~~ SURV:.>'. _.~ 1;-, = _ ~/ / : _ ~ . .. 1 .: NO.69-.-,," ~'~ . ~ii', ; tr.., . ;; e---, Ol ',_ ~-'~" 1 R-l 5,.. = _ ::if-- __ >_ . . :r , KRES ," ".. . r · Le-" ~..' ~" _SU{i'~..~ '. I' . ..--:-~-- ~'_ -no __.. 1 I ... ~~ -. .fl' _ _'0 -'- _, , .'" ;-.' 8. .. ___ , ..,.';;-- .. " " "? . .' . - e---'~.l'L- I " -.. l, , i'. . >------3' ",-- '-. '~_ e---. ',NO .. . ~_. , '. __ , d'C'- " FO~. ',:. ",., ,;'_ ~ N8'_',MEAh(JW~ A.>I-:"C-j ___ ~=-- . :-,... -< . . ...:= -., . ~ 't'; 'h- '. " ."" . . . '\ \ .3-_..__ r=: ': ~ '_~~~~,tj,. - /" ....~~-'..- '- -~ ' -- ~= I"( -. , , ,I . ~~fj .. ' -i:' ':: '-1; _Jl I:! . : -I -:f z' ';1/ . -;- -~ ; ~ '- ! 'I, """ . , . ~, -. - ~ -, -2 ' ~. ~~ ~j" : '.:..~"". . ~ F2:J;' ""- ~ - INDIA.. J '. , _ ::-.. 1 _, ' 1--, 'V ,'- I." -5--~ '. 7. :_' ,; __ ' -, '..-" . ,1 "~--"P'r ----r -- /~.~ '/ ~D(j G.~E:l~J -...... - "u/.,lL...>- . A~ v . E: .R;~ . , :'t";-.-._._ _~ '...' --, ---'- \ - r . n.. - n . "'-----'8'_. _ ~~~ ~. L ~ Rr-I . ,"': :~ C~'~~~"r~~::_ I ;.. " ." ,..;,~. '----.;..--0 '. . LAKE~':~t, \~' ,- ,'-0""';'-',:0,;',. 1,.J. i ,;,"""" . . A . q \~!: _.. J ~. . .'::'" T, "..J1.,. .. . . . r-o:----" ' . ., "<.- " .. .' . , ~'-:-:1 ' ':~ =: u.. I + .. \", r'.' --';{rr - '-, '1-., , _....,. 'dJ. ANo..OYE::isT" I r- ,.re', I ~.'" ~ --;-c ", ",. . . ". . ,~ ~ , ., . ,- -, n . I ROUNDr- _ . .1:>., ~ "~~ 1 .- -1 "i"';'-' . :i:. .0,. 1"."" ..., , ': LAKE 17/ ..._......' _ ' '. "J. '. . . .' ismE/, ILL!... ~i . J WND'f~ ~~"~~:'A~E"i;" I . 0.0:, '. ~ .. ...I~I .:' . ~ . . 1 . ~' '1 ~', f __ - zt '. --- ~ ~ / :f =--i]< ~ . · . , ~- I ~~""<1' ", '''~_ '" , _.. ! ill.t. ' ~::~' ',~~', . ~ .~ .,'.' .,- :. ,. t. · ."';" ~ !. :'.l:". '. :ill: 'l ~ /_, 'w. e> R-I ~ sU.~'~'SOH ""_<"., lr.t:E~ ~ ,'\' "" . 0 - . . '-'---", "'- 'It, ..\_ .,.. c,-, , ""..ro, .-,;; . v, "'~ . _-- ...~ . ~ i "'- " ):'.::. -- ! ~ - ,=>',_; -:L '~r :,~. __ .. ~ """l ~'::::j I=----lIR -3-:l R I "~~.l--;~....,-= ~" --". 1.' \\t-~~. " ~u. ; - - . , ~-'~= ~ - -'..'.. :'::'-\'~.'~S'~"'I ~~ . ~:;~:! " ......~. \'..~,~'r . I ri;1 M- 2 R . ~ ~ ;c',=:!"': ':~I-: '--4~ " . - -. "':::-'" -..,... .... Itt'l T 1"'1 '"pl.' . "1 ! II -)-- --III : J.+} .J I ~ _ -::1 -' / 'ER~3= 4-- ..~--, -~l-:-: --r-~\J~' .\t -- - . -- , ,I I .:_ ~ ':~ t-PINE ~, ~, I-HII!.LS, L-f t- -, ","; l' JI . Ill'"'>Jl. I :J I~~: I'~L ~; ,. ,:....- ~i.. I ..-4.- ~_..~ -1- - - I" I, / .j :1 f-:-'. J: ./ Ji - - ..:~ : - ~: -- _.1.;.. ~ ~ I I I. . ~OO: 'S A., ~II Ift.O f, R=-: ') , / .- ) ',~ ~, {;~t"l '1\ 'r \ i' '~~'~;'""",;_J~;-j,",,,,,,,1i;1;!" CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Engineering February 19, 1991 ITEM NO. g. Indian Meadows 6th Platting Proposal / ~ BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to consider the request of New Generation Homes to plat what would be known as Indian Meadows 6th Addition without requiring street construction similiar to what has been approved in the area of xenia street at CSAH 20 (157th Avenue NW) and in exchange the city would be dedicated the pond area as park property. As indicated in Mr. Backman's letter the park and Recreation Commission has expressed much interest in acquiring this area and would be included as part of the overall Master Plan for Kelsey- Round Lake Park. Note: The City Council would have to enter into an agreement simi1iar to that of the 4 lots on Xenia street. It is possible to combine the 5th and 6th Additions under one agreement. COUNCIL ACTION , MOTION BY ) TO SECOND BY FROM C~REW PROPERTIES IlElSLlNG PIIlK NOmH Mr. '!odd Haas City of Andover Andover, MN 55304 Re: Indian Meadows IV & V and Park Land Dedication Dear Mr. Haas: After meeting with the Park Board dnd City Council, I thought it would be appropriate to restate my understanding of where we are concerning park dedication/platting of our property in Andover. In order to assist the park board in meeting its concerns regarding access from county Rd 20 to Kelsey Park,' as part of the approval of the plats for Indian Meadows IV and V, New Generation Properties would agree to the following: (1) Dedication of the approximate area described as Lot 1 Block 7 on the preliminary plat of Andover West; this area to be used to provide a parking area for access to the park. The area consists of approximately 3 acres. (2) Dedication of all of the 8.1 acres outlined in green on the concept drawing and adjacent to the areas dedicated as parK of the previous plats. In exchange the City council would agree that the excess acreage above that required for Indian Meadows IV and V would be credited to future park dedication requirements in the .event New Generation properties, or a successor owner of the property, undertake platting of the balance of the property. The acreage to be dedicated exceeds the current dedication requirement for the balance of our property. ( 3 ) New Generation Properties would dedicate, as part of a final plBt for Indian Meadows V, that portion of Xenia Street from County 20 to the new parking area. '!he final plat would be filed without construction of the streets or escrows or letters of credit for construction of . the improvements. New Generation Properties would enter an agreement with the City to be recorded against each lot ~tating that,no building permits could be drawn on any of tho foui'lota until the street construction was completed or sufficient escrows to insure completion were provided. At the time we decided to 'develop the four lots, we would construct the street to normal residential standards at our own cost. The south end of Xenia ) of"u tr i,\ \,' 11\ 'ItJ. '\'\),,\ ~, r;y ~ FROM C~REW PROPERTIES P. 1 ,_)February 12, 1991 Mr. Todd Haas page 2 Street to be for future meantime, it blade in and requirements constructed 3 feet below current grade to allow grading of the balance of the site. In the is our understanding that the park board would gravel the dedicated roadway to meet the access for Kelsey Park. ,~ NEW GENERATION PROPERTIES, INC. l!J~ Q ~ ~/~yne A. Bachman Vice President , ~ I , .!t :r . L'" . ...... to.. " of ...~ ~l .lr:"'1 . :". ~....,..., I . .,.' ,.'" .,1 I \ 't . ..... ,I."" . ~ I, '.' .... '.. " I ,,.,,, ~ ., ~~.. rf M ...t4 ., ~ 1. I , '. .' : :v.-- '< l).-4 , " . ,: I" "I"" ',\'' '1".' : \ I, I' 0' I". .' t. (~ ":,'..,....~.~~.":"','''''~. <c4'" (~~) CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION February 19, 1991 AGENDA SECTION NO. Discussion Items DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Administration ITEM NO.q. Appoint CCWD Member BY: James E. Schrantz APPRO'lE D~ ,oR AGENpA" / Bv,iL / The City Council is requested to recommend a representative to the Coon Creek watershed District from Andover. Bob Boyum is Andover's current representative to the watershed District. The City of Andover can recommend a representative but the Anoka County Board makes the appointment. Bob Boyum is willing to serve on the Watershed Board for another term. Bob has been doing a good job on the Board according to all the feedback that I have. COUNCil ACTION MOTION BY '- TO SECOND BY , "', ~ ~"" o (tA) \j-4;~~~""''''',!/;'''i""oj~1l CITY OF ANDOVER AGENDA SECTION NO. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION February 19, 1991 DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT BY: James E. Schrantz Discussion Items Engineering ITEM NO. 10. WOE/Hanson Blvd. The city Council is requested to discuss the letter from Group 28 Attorneys/Margaret Coughlin concerning waste residues in the Hanson Boulevard right-of-way adjacent to the WOE Site. The letter from Coughlin and the copy of the Report titled "Hanson Boulevard Easement Waste Definition Boreholes" is is in the packet pocket. MOTION BY '- TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY ,~":":."~_""'.T"".~"" ;~ (tA) .,~:~ -"..-..,,~;;Jf''''-''' ~-"',*",<\'''' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ITEM NO. II. HRA Officers DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT l) Planning ~ David L. Carlberg BY: Ci ty planner February 19, 1991 HRA Meeting AGENDA SECTION NO. REQUEST At the February 5, 1991 City Council meeting the Council requested information on the officers of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. BACKGROUND On January 17, 1989 the following officers of the Andover HRA were appointed. Chairman - Jim Elling vice-Chair - Don Jacobson Sec./Treas. - Marjorie Perry The support staff were appointed in September of 1987 and are as follows: Treasurer - Shirley Clinton Secretary - Marcie Peach The Council may choose to reappoint those officers currently holding a position on the Council, with Mayor Orttel as Chairman. '- MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY fl"~i'<""""'''''''''''''''''''i\ ;ij ~! 'Jii ,1;' \ \'''"",,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;;1/'' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION February 19, 1991 DATE AGENDA SECTION NO. HRA Meeting ORIGINATING Planning DEPARTMEN~ APPRF:J,EDj -OR AGENYM B;/ '~ ITEM NO. 1:1. Public Hearing - COBG Contingency Funds David L. Carlberg BY: Ci ty Planner REQUEST The Andover Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is requested to approve the 1990 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) contingency funds for the acquisition of neighborhood revitalization and redevelopment projects. BACKGROUND The City currently has $8,899 in the 1990 CDBG contingency fund. The CDBG contingency fund can be allocated to the ongoing neighborhood revitalization and redevelopment project. These projects include the purchasing of blighted properties as established under CDBG guidelines. The City recently purchased the Lindgren mobile home and property located at 1719 Andover Boulevard with such funds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION staff recommends the City Council approve the allocation of 1990 CDBG contingency funds for the acquisition of neighborhood revitalization and redevelopment projects. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY '- TO SECOND BY o ....)~,<,i~'i""',,,.,,'~" ;< '\ ,f ~. ,1 ~ l ji ''t}.,j ""~~l~''':!f~..-4J;~' DATE February 19. 1991 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT NQ Staff, Committee, Comm ITEM NQ Approve Election Resul s 1.1. BY: Fire Department V. VOlk\\' FOR The City Council is requested to approve the results of the Fire Department election as follows: Fire Chief Assistant Chief Secretary Glenn Smith Dale Mashuga Larry Cape ling COUNCIL ACTION , ) MOTION BY - TO SECOND BY '/;"~;"""""~~'~"""',,"\~ :,) l J \_' 1'1 - -'~~~~" _ .'. ,/.f ~-~.~~~" CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION DATE February lq lqql FOR AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT NO. Staff, Committee, Comm Fire Department ~J.M Amend Ord. 42/Fire Ord Iif'. BY: \\' V. Volk \) The Fire Department has requested that the City Council amend Ordinance No. 42, the Fire Ordinance, to increase the number of fire fighters allowed to no more than 50. When the ordinance was first adopted, the maximum number of fire fighters was 35. Attached is the amendment to the ordinance. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY '- - TO SECOND BY ~) " -J CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 42A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 42, KNOWN AS THE FIRE ORDIANCE. The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains: Ordinance No. 42 is hereby amended as follows: Section 1. Fire Department Establishment This department shall be composed of no less than fifteen (15) nor more than thirty-five (35) fifty (50) active members..... Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 19 CITY OF ANDOVER Attest: Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor Victoria volk - City Clerk :J '".....,~{".,~,.._,e_,~",,\,'.. ,~,t' '\ ,.f 1\ ~~ ~ 1 ~ iff> iff ~'~~ ~lr: -.~~;,~"'""""'*~~ff CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION DATE February 19, 1991 ITEM NO. /5. Turnout Gear Purchase Fire Department v. VOlk\\' APPR A2>6-D, FOR AGE 07 J AGENDA SEC[ION NO. Sta f, Commi ttee, Comm ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT BY: BY: v Fire Chief Glenn Smith asked that the Council be informed of the purchase of turnout gear. They have ordered 16 sets (coats and pants) at a price of $509.00 per set for a total cost of $8,144. This purchase will come out of the bond money. Attached are the bids from the different suppliers who bid on these items. Attach. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY \ '- I TO SECOND BY ~ (" Y\ D U- +- C 0 Vl'\ 1-1'\ ; +t-ee....-- --/7 (:2/11-- /b Se+- prIce. _./ -. w,: [,>~ we. -re ce;ue d 0 VI -I-u r VI. Ou.. 1-- :je.aY- :4 LL fJ eo..v "5 I B1C\(/k: PBT . 7.5""020. l-/o%?e,r!,o./. L b 1'. ;rev /a.r- . . In I ~ V\ e SD 1-0.._ Co Y\ I....k).y FI ;.~ i S~fe.-If {j)Fo., CD~J- a:r'ld t'Qr\-ts JJ tZg,DD / OJ D1(g - - J( 0 VV\. w e~ V- ( :c VI c.. . .. ._;,. . CD Fo'V C Oa -t,-, QY1. d fall'l. --Is JlS7Y,. 0 D <i?) ] Lf Lj . . . ,. ~.;' G (0 be.. F \ ~e +\0 k4-ev-s 5u /'t ([) fov- COo...f-- 0.0\. J Pa Ylls JJ 6>47. D D /3) S5Z- ?Y-\~e.. ~lre.-t'\ 6ff pnLe- ~I~f- do.l-e..J. S4-f+ IS; /990 ------- -- Arb 1 TV\L CD Fov COCl.t- <?hcl fa/lth :17bo.oo ?V-Lc..e- .fa(C<\I\O(( pVl~e. LI;1- c/q,te..dap,,:r '1/990 I Z) J b 0 - Ran di v/e;-kovrf- (0 O' \ I SO\c.. fC k \ c.. ~ CA v- 0 S () ~\ oJ I . "//au.1 Yv'\r;..y-iIJ'o.,qCLO , I/v1 q S+ev copt -- DClI~ ;11 Q sl.tUj l\ \~ ~ I I I I I , , , I TO: r L DATE: '. ~ . mlllll1lll1l~~~f~ ~ (~Il1lW~'Yrl fFll~~ ~ ~~W~lr~ COMPLETE PROTECTION FIRE & SECURITY " 4565 West nth Street. Minneapolis, MN 55435 . (612) 893-0798 quotation quotation MARK FOR: ..., ANDOVER FIRE DEPARTMENT 1785 CROSSTOWN BLVD. ANDOVER, HN 55304 ATTN: HR. GLEN SHITH .J DECEMBER 17, 1990 F.O.B. ANDOVER FIRE DEPT. MASON DIXON CUSTOM DELUXE SERIES TURNOUT COATS (HNFPA-1G) (16) COATS CONSIST OF 7.5 OZ. 40~ PBI/60~ KEVLAR OUTER SHELL MATERIAL, BLACK IN COLOR WITH A GORE-TEX MOISTURE BARRIER LAMINATED TO NOMEX, SEWN-TO NOMEX QUILT LINER. BOTH S~NfIN AT NECK ONLY~J d ALL BARRIER SEAM~L!f,Q"'RE-TAPED. INCLUDl!:lL ~IM"R SHOULDERS, P" f Kev\4l"LEATIIER ELBOWS, ~ CUFFS, TWQ...~ I~R REINFORCED SEMI-BELLOWS'CARGO POCKETS, ONE b~A R REIHFORCED RADIO POCKET ON LEFT CHEST, KEVLAR OVERHAND MODEL THUMBHOLE WRISTLETS, VELCRO NAME STRIPS ON RIGHT CHEST, E-MERG CLOSURE SYSTEM (ZIPPER WITH VELCRO), AND NFPA RED ORANGE REFLEXITE (SOLOMAN STYLE) TRIM WITH "ANDOVER FD" SEWN ON BACK WITH 3" RED ORANGE REFLEXITE LETTERS AND SPECIFIED LETTER "A" (ANDOVER STYLE), ALL LEATHER ON COATS IS TO BE BLACK IN COLOR. ALL POCKETS ARE TO HAVE VELCRO CLOSURES THE FULL WIDTH OF POCKETS AND COATS ARE TO BE~5" IN LENGTH WITH LABEL OF NFPA APPROVAL SEWN IN COAT. 33" $379.00 EA./.6,064.00 , :1 , ! NOTE: OVERSIZE CHARGES NOT INCLUDED CHEST SIZES: 36" - 46" 48" 50" 52" 54" STANDARD PRICE ADDITIONAL 5~ ADDITIONAL 10~ ADDITIONAL 15~ ADDITIONAL 20" (CONTINUED TO PAGE 2) (PLEASE REFER TO PROPOSAL NO. WHEN ORDERING) \ CONomONS OF SALE: ; We shall furnish orty the equipment shown on the quotation . lor the price quoted. My addltlonaJ equipment needed to meet '"'>8CIIIcatlons ahal be charged lor In accordance with our gln8l quotation. '..J PRICES: subject to chsnge wtlhout notice , , I .i : l We appreciate this opportunity to quote you and thilnk you lor your inquiry. MINNESOTA CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY, INC, ( . -' r:-~~. J BY: Y) ,1'>-- _.I."'-~N' Customer. WMa File Copy . Canary ~ Sales. Pink ',' ".... ......'U1...~...I...;".,..,.. < .....,~....l"... .I......rll;,;. '.~,:,.' "''''.~~''''''..'.' I' ....-. ..... '.,,"-~..~":' ....;!.. ,. . ,. / , I ~~J ,r" ffill((j)((j)~~(Q)IA R"' <6(Q)((j)WA\\f fFll~~ ~ $1~fF~lr~ COMPLETE PROTECTION FIRE & SECURITY , I I I I r I i i .I TO: r ANDOVER FIRE DEPT. (PAGE 2) 4565 West nth Street. Minneapolis, MN 55435 . (612) 893-0798 quotation quotation MARK FOR: "I W-e d ~ L .J DATE: DECEMBER 17, 1990 F.O.B. {JiJA DIXON CUSTOM DELUXE BUNKER PANTS (MNFPA-1PG) . (/~ PANTS CONSIST OF 7.5 oz. 40X PBI/60~ KEVLAR OUTER SHELL MATERIAL, BLACK IN COLOR WITH A GORE-TEX MOISTURE BARRIER LAMINATED TO NOMEX SEWN TO NOMEX QUILT LINER. BOTH SEWN~N AT ~J~~ ON~.".~ALL . BARRIEB....~J;:~MS GORE-TAPED. INCLUDES L T\lEiYH'~l:.s, ~ CUFFS, TWO ~ REINFORCED (10" X 10" X 2") CARGO POCKETS ON THIGHS, 2" VELCRO FLY CLOSURE ACROSS TOP OF PANT AND DOWN FLY WITH LEATHER BELT ADJUST~ENT AT WAIST, NFPA STYLE ~ R~~ ORANGE REFLEXITE TRIM AND HEAVY DUTY RED SUSPENDERS. ALL L ~~ ON PANTS IS TO BE BLACK IN COLOR. POCKETS ARE TO HAVE VELCRO CLOSURES FULL WIDTH OF POCKETS. 8249.00 PR./*3,984.00 MINNESOTA CONWAY WILL COME OUT AND SIZE INDIVIDUALS AT YOUR CONVENIENCE AND DELIVERY IS 75-90 DAYS ARO. THANK you. (PLEASE REFER TO PROPOSAL NO. WHEN ORDERING) .. CONDITIONS OF SALE: We ahan furnish only the equipment shown on the quotation . ,r the pr1ce quoted. Arry additional equipment needed to meet . .~ ,>ecIllcatlons ahaJl be charged lor In accordance with our original qualatlon. PRICES: IUbject to 'chango without notJce We appreciate this opportunity to quote you and thank you lor your Inquiry. MINNESOTA CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY, INC. BY: ~-<-~4!_~n'/ ',' ",. ".J#o'_._......A..Mr..'~_. ,.,.M......"(,..,. ,,~~;:~It~. ,,, ..f:1I~ ~,~.C~,~.ry Balli. Pink "".':'" t '- ."\~"~~ ,'0. f' I"": ~~!"',; 1:'1 ", ~.. '~ . i\:; .. '1" . :11'; ,'S ..--- r / fu'/e cL fa. ViI weqlrj -!v ANDOVER FIRE DEPT. 1785 Crosstown Blvd. N.W. Andover, Minnesota 55304 T~L- '\ 'J ,I' 12/10/90 TURNOUT GEAR SPECIFICATIONS 1. Turnout Coats and Bunker Pants shall be 7.5 PBI Kevlar Ripstop with a Goretex moisture barrier, sewn to a Nomax quilt liner. 2. Coats shall have padded PBI Kevlar Ripstop elbow and sholder patches. Pants shall have padded PBI Kevlar knee patches. Quilted moisture liner shall have extra padded material in sholder area. 3. Pant and sleeve cuffs shall be made with reinforcement of PBI Kevlar Ripstop. 4. Coat shall have two bellows cargo pockets and one pocket. Radio pocket to mesure 9"x5" on left front. have two bellows cargo pockets. 5. All pockets to have velcro closures. 6. Front opening of Coat shall be zip/velcro combination, with emergency zip release. Pant shall have a velcro/snap fly with a pant take up strap. radio Pant shall 7. The Coats shall be black in color with red/orange reflexite style 3" width trim. 8. Trim will be of the "SOLOMON" placement with one deviation as depicted in the sketch. (design of letter "A") 9. The name ANDOVER and letters F. D. shall be sewn on the back with red/orange reflexite 3" in height as depicted. 10. All Coats and Pants are to meet O.S.H.A. and N.F.P.A. requirements. 11. Coats are to be 33" in length. 12. A PBI Kevlar Ripstop velcro strip shall be located on the 2" ~ 11')0- " b -~ outside collar of Coat near the right front, which can be removed t..JI'Jt for fire flghteridentiflcation when entering structures. '. '~' ;.~-:-'~-:- '.. .;.:' - -.', ' ":r""'. ". "-". .,..- ..~._...:<~..~.;: . ~ ::>:i~,~~~::.!'.. .;', " .. .:'. dlq"'OI\~" ,:~ ;'", , ';':.J;;~;~jt' (f'O "'\i ."' " . . .., I... ,~ : <" :':":.':'~::',:i" .. '.' ~ . ' .~ :. .:, ::., . ,~. .~::...:'::.;:?:~.:~}:~_,~:'.:" . ":"':'!:;"'I. ""':':' ,', . "f',~;', ;"y);;<:i'";'i-:"'~;'\'f!:;'-\ ." ,/.:,t~:':i.i~i:\i~t>:.L",~ "'<l;:'l\:.i.T>~~~#~~:;'-;~C,:~L:,:: :,..,.~,..~..i......-,.~i~..,;j.,.:..,'.::..~,~.;,':.'~.~.. ." ;'U' :..... ....u..,/.. ..}{_..~:. _....! '.._, _"i.. '..: _~;'. :1.'.'; .'"~.. . _.~. , ~'__o..I,... ',' . . ...... '::J "~ -~:'ii: . J.! ~(. . ~ ,J 'P y-\ ceS . I _ . / . .f' ~ f I r-~ c.e \ VlO Cl ? t...V' P flo Y\~ LeDVlarct klel~w.af'\. w : +t.- 21 2... <1G) MASON DIXON CUSTOM DELUXE SERIES TURNOUT COATS (MNFPA-1G) COATS CONSIST OF 7.5 OZ. 40~ PBI/GO~ KEVLAR OUTER SHELL MATERIAL, BLACK IN COLOR WITH A GORE-TEX MOISTURE BARRIER LAMINATED TO NOMEX, SEWN TO NOMEX QUILT LINER. BOTH S~N,IN AT NECK ONLY'II d ALL BARRIER SEAM~L~.QRE-TAPED. INCLUD~~t~AVIMR SHOULDERS, pfltsn ktv\,u"LEJ\TUER ELBOWS, ~ CUFFS, TWIL~1r'i4. REINFORCED SEMI-BELLOWS'CARGO POCKETS, ONE b~A ~R REINFORCED RADIO POCKET ON LEFT CHEST, KEVLAR OVERHAND MODEL THUMBHOLE WRISTLETS, VELCRO NAME STRIPS ON RIGHT CHEST, E-MERG CLOSURE SYSTEM (ZIPPER WITH VELCRO), AND NFPA RED ORANGE REFLEXITE (SOLOMAN STYLE) TRIM WITH "ANDOVER FD" SEWN ON BACK WITH 3" RED ORANGE REFLEXITE LETTERS AND SPECIFIED LETTER "A" (ANDOVER STYLE), ALL LEATHER ON COATS IS TO BE BLACK IN COLOR. ALL POCKETS ARE TO HAVE VELCRO CLOSURES THE FULL WIDTH OF POCKETS AND COATS ARE TO BE~ IN LENGTH WITH LABEL OF NFPA APPROVAL SEWN IN COAT. 33" /3aSe. Z03.~0 'Pq....fr HI ,. . Ba!Oe... /2. b . D 0 laC/( Pu 38. 00 ~7. 00 91~,,1c par iI .s~ I.,,,.",, 37 L..lhn . '0 Co...., 0 p oc.lr..fs ) 2,. 60 ',. raJ;.. Pocl<et- 7."0 K"H-!> par J 3. DO ""e. ,...... -A,....tc. '; P"';'jo ro,hf ~.oo ~u~p~d~ . ].00 e \ >>;:;,~, +to< . cf , \..J....;stl<-K Ve ltro SJ.,....f ,4v.Jov... I'-D ,.. tfOo"" Co^+ IS: :> '0 ;flee J at' + pO" it- ..fs 0"' !'9h s,'d., of- L-e$s + 0\ (j~els cue. . , shClf-e- ~,()O /93 3.0'0 '1.00 3)1:, Ibhl j 5'09. OD I I PANTS CONSIST OF 7 .50Z. -40~ PBlIGO" KEVLAR OUTER SHELL MATERIAL, I ~ BLt.C~ rN COLOR WITH A GORE-TEX MOISTURE BARRIER LAMINATED TO NOMEX I SEWN TO NOMEX QUILT LINER. BOTH. SEWN ~1f,_~T._W~-A~ ONJ,.l,,,, ALL BARRIEEl.~g~MS GORE-T~PED. INCLUDES ~1Of~~s, L~THER CUFFS, " TWO L~' REINFORCED (10" X 10" X 2") CARGO POCKETS ON THIGHS, 2" I VELCRO FLY CLOSURE ACROSS TOP OF PANT AND DOWN FLY WITH LEATHER BELT AD3USTMENT AT WAIST, NFPA STYLE 3~.~gp- ORANGE REFLEXITE TRIM AND HEAVY DUTY RED SUSPENDERS. ALL LC^~~ ON PANTS IS TO BE BLACK IN COLOR. POCKETS ARE TO HAVE VELCRO CLOSURES FULL WIDTH OF POCKETS. ,'. .,) , , " I.. No e'/..1-vO--.. c.osh ~y- Io.rye-r S/'Z-c..s .... . ./- . Date--1h~L l(Y, ~\1~tl'i 'JER"'At-{T f~~ ~', \-b\2~'75S~~23 RAMW&AR, Inc. Price Quotation form Department \1~~tN ElL r\{\~ \)~\1\ ~riCil Ouoto 1 Price Quote 11 o Based on Purchase of ~~ Units Based on Purchase of Outer Shell____~ Outer Shall Moi$curo aarrier~~()~ ~tl\~Moisture Barrier Thermal LiMr~ft\E::1.. ~\\..."T Thermal Liner n\"",,\ Baga ?ric~ Coat ~lJo}_2E;;l.\.SS Base Price COliC V\'t:\J I~ ~\t:. \~\lt\ ~ ~ .. 1\ ~ ~.t)~ . Ii) . ~~'"\ ~L ~t. 'lJ~~ ~=~ ~ . ~~~~ 9..00 ~ ~ -~. ~ ~ ~\l.\~ ~a) 5.~ Rs~~ ~\)~ 3.00. ~ Total Coat Price Jsa.~l. Base Pant Price '-' &o1Q\\.\\E.l"'\t1\ Nt ~D~ Re.~~ \\,~ ~ S\~E Uv:t ts.~I';\')a~\~\\\ib -1~.(i). ~t\) R~!\~c, ~~t~ \~~ ~.tll..__. UnitS '-" . \\~t.. ~ ~~lt Total COiit PriCe Base E'ant E'ric~ TOtdl Pant Price Suspender COl~r~ Suspender fabric~ Suspender Price 1~~.I..' Total Pant Price Suspender Color Suspender Fabric .-J ~ Suspender Price Grand Total ~ Grand Total ~.~~~~~=~~~~ \%\)~ <. ~~,~~L tM.~ ~~ Sig~atur~ ~ n~()1\\ RN-IWEAR, Inc, SalQsp.Hson O"tc .......... pa.geJjofJ] .. .. ... .;'... - .:.r~~~;~' O~~~~ . ..,.,-~.;. .' ":;T~::~~~;' D'epart:nentJ}nd~~~y ..' h;-~ 'l&pf Couhty-A-V1.PJrA~ .;'....'.!:.~::\ ,I' MdressJ1 9) C.~OJS]"I~lVoc."lhoneJz11:.. 7SS--9o'lL/..... C it}', Stat&, Z~r~~ ~J D...e I? P\ A.tI ~OtltaC~ j(q,r1 .Jy__.V1.e_t'.KQl\t Bill '!'o,____ St,ip io__.___ ...__._.u.._____ l' O~te .2. ~ ~'11 ;J ~. - '1' .,'. . " - , ../.. \, S IJ ,.,... t Sales P,Hscn !e:::r.$ r:U~.l.")I.:r of Ur.it~ Ordered Acca:~ Outer si;~;.. i.!.;cer.:.a: 7i-_~.f51="__ 0::tec $ll<,11 ::~lU___i-li1Q~__ ~6aS.: Prl..:e Tri~: c- r-:3tHi.:tl <:, ..- _.Lt: Color Versivll --- Price . .' . i .1 Standarc ~Ptio;.~: -p'ey-- ~\c.~~r. J- ')0. 9.L .__ r. i 1 1 I i I : .) -- . ~'i)".3.~ r:_~::; f~:' ~:~i~;;'(':;:!f,:ri~ S~~:J''::::l~: SU~l t:rld~ r s : J:'~~,.. i~ Celor -"----- r;,::l:. ~.'~ = J' ::.~t ~ .--. _l~..J"n:;: ..3. z.. .'.:, t:;..: t:!i~:' ~ :.:,~ !",:,~ 2 :.:::.:,;: ~:; NI).YYJ.e.x Q.U\'H- ;.:,': ,': ,:~'" ,.; :>. "..,Gor~+tX ON NOMf.. ,....;:, . ." ~'....-. ;. ::i: r. BD,~ 2391 ~..~4;:. P L ~I..': . - io--.J..._._... " ,. . . '\ o 9302 Progress Parkwa, Menial. Chio 44050.1959 12! 61 339.0137 fu: (216)539.0438 ,) I" i I I P'OIIt1ing Ind Serving r IIllighlo,s 01 Amelit. May 2, 1990' 1. Features In Addition to Specs (Offered at No Additional Charge) Permanently attached shoulder pads, sewn in between the moisture and thermal barrier, and graded to size. :'f 2. 100\ lock-stitch construction. 3. Neckline moisture barrier extension which reduces steam penetration at the neck seam, This extension contains moisture barrier fabric as well as thermal barrier f~ric in order for the snaps to not only be covered, ~ut insulated as. well. 4. Bar tacking of all stress points for additional reinforcment. 5. Two layers of moisture barrier'and one layer of thermal barrier inside the collar and throat tab, 6. Finished edges on coat facing. 7. Turned in finish around moisture barrier and thermal barrier reinforced with a lock-stitch top stitch. 8. The thermal and moisture barrier fabrics used in the facings are consistent with those chosen for the rest 'of the coat, so consistent 360 degree protection is maintained, 9., All grommets.and rivets are finished with a washer on the inside. 10. RAMWEAR does not charge extra for special sizing, We custom build our garments, so special sizing is no problem, 11, RAMWEAR offers a two year warranty on our workmanship, with the only charge being freight charges in the I second year. 12. RAMWEAR, Inc, is a MANUFACTURER of turn out gear selling directly to the purchaser, thereby giving direct access to the manufacture and service of the products purchased. 13. Storm flap which completely covers the hooks and dee's tO~Ieduce the danger of snagging. 14. Double wristlet system. 15. The facings of the waist band of the pants is, again, constructed of moisture and thermal barrier fabrics so all snaps are insulated. 16, Heat transfer prevention system,' All hardware on coat and pants is not on1ycovered, but also insulated with thermal fabric, to provide the most protection. ~..-..:.. 4 ,. < '. , : · ~-J :.1 9302 Progress Parkway . , Menlor, Ohio 44060. i 859 .'. 12161639.0137 fu: (2161639.0436 0' ~ ",' , \ I '. ./ . Prole Cling Ind Serving firelighters 01 America ~, ", " Hay 2, 1990 EXCEPTIONS TO SPECIFICATIONS The following exceptions, are respectfully submitted as being"in our opinion, better than the items specified. They:are submitted for your consideration, however, if you 'do not agree. they are equal to or better than the specifications, garments will be made exactly as specified for the same. price. Coats:. .": Riveting. . RAHWEAR'reinforces all stress points with a 28 stitch per inch bar..ta'ck rather than. riveting, This allows for an equally strong reinforcement, ~ithout the danger of metal contact.; .. outer Shell Collar RAMWEAR's standard collar construction is five layers ,rather than the four specified. This is due.to the fact we include two layers of moisture barrier fabric rather than one, One layer of moisture barrier fabric is against the outer shell, and one layer is against the corduroy'~o-- moisture protection is provided whether the collar is raised or down. Outer Shell Throat Strap RAHWEAR's throat strap is constructed in the same manner as the collar, with two layers of mo~sture barrier fabric, so moisture protection is provided whether the strap is open or closed. Outer Shell Sleeve Stitching RAMWEAR manufactures with 100\ lock-stitch construction as it is the safest stitch construction available. Our top seam on the sleeve is manufactured with a lock-stitch lap seam, however it is not possible to use this type of seam on the closing of a tubular piece of fabric. Therefore, we use a serge stitch with a safety stitch, and then further reinforce the seam with an additional lock-stitch seam. Outer Shell Thennal Front Construction RAMWEAR uses, in the front facings of the coat, the same thermal and moisture liner fabrics as are used in the rest of the coat, These provide the stability necessary in the ~ ,;. t. - . .' . "f . , 'J , " , ! I : I i I : I : I i I i! . I .\ I I ....:;.... '.. i " , , I ) / ! , ! ,1", ," front, and, when using a breathable liner system, do not eliminate the breathable properties of the liner system in the critical center front area as neoprene coated needlepunch does. Pants :, Riveting See above Outside Storm Fly Front Closure System In order to comply with N,F,P,A" 1971 Chapter 3-9,7, Hooks anq Dees Requirements, RAMWEAR uses the type of hook and dee specified in the standard, The dee ring is riveted to the fly flap, and the hook is riveted to the outer'shell of the pants. (See Attached) RAMWEAR's take up strap is then constructed of outer shell fabric which does not stretch as leather does and is sewn to the outer shell, passes through a rust resistant metal slide and closes by means of Velcro hook and pile allowing maximum secure adjustment. Coats 26" or Shorter and Pants RAMWEAR has developed a high waisted pant'which involves an extension which rises above the waist, but does not cover the heart and lung area, This extension can be turned down to the nor.mal waist level during the cool down period to allow gradual body cooling. This design incluqes a belt ~de from outer shell fabric wrapped around neoprene coated needlepunch fabric,\and incorporates a zipper closure. Technical specifications for these trousers, as well as descriptive literature is included for your reference.. If desired, however, RAHWEAR will make the trousers as specified at no difference in cost, Options: Suspenders RAMWEAR has developed a non-stretch, or limited-stretch ,suspender made from outer shell fabric wrapped around neoprene ceated needlepunch padding which allows the pants to be held ill position for pro;>er fit and provides' increased comfort due to the padding, .~) ..."-.""~'>~"-i~"" J/'~./. ""\,~ '~J i! ~ ~ '\,:J t'A.,;.t~ ~~~~""':.,."-~",,j6~-ffi;'fIt.{J!'" CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION , NO. Staff, Commlttee, Comm DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Admin. ITEM NO. /(P. Approval of Classifica ion & Sale of Forfeit La day: \\. V. VolklJ BY: The following parcels have gone forfeit and the County requires that we approve the classification and sale of forfeit parcels, Parcel #1 PIN 12 32 25 34 0008 - parcel is approximately 200' x 217' and is located at the north end of Argon Street at about 166th Lane. At one time the city owned this parcel; however, it was given back to the state. Parcel #2 PIN 13 32 24 22 0013 - The north portion of this parcel is a landlocked description gap approx. 3' x 275'. The other part is approx. 50'x180'. They are located north of Ward Lake Drive on the west side of County Road 18. Parcel JI3 PIN 15 32 24 31 0032 - Approx. 25' x 250' on the west side of Quinn st. just south of 161st Ave. N.W. Parcel is landlocked behind houses. Parcel #4 PIN 24 32 24 23 0001 - Parcel is "Z" shaped. Top portion is 335' x 200'; lower portion is approximately 335' x 341'. Parcel is at the west end of 155th Ave. just west of Larch Street. Parcel #5 PIN 33 32 24 34 0066 - This parcel is a 25' triangle which is part of the front lawn of a house located on the west side of Gladiola st. N,W. just south of 135th Lane N.W. , .-/ MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY \ '---./' ) Page 2 Forfeit Lane These parcels are still in the repurchase period and would not be available for sale until Auust 29, 1991. If the city desires to acquire any of them, we need to file a written application with the County Board to withhold the parcel from sale. A motion is required to approve the classification and sale of these forfeit properties. Attached are maps showing the locations of the parcels. ,~ , \ ,-~ , ! I , I i_~:_-_-~ ! I ! I :PA.r~c.1 .~ i~ (J) ~ a: "- r.; N , <3 o <Xl :!: l....-_____ , I \ !1 -----~---- , ! I i \ ICASTNER \ 'ADDJTION \ ' , I' . , I I I I ' , . , 8 ~ . 1/ l-~r'-~l ,~ /~ ' I' "\--=-- ; III I I Ii I~ '1 : Ii/ ~~--I---- 1:1 ...:. I I ill I iii I I,:: ! I iii gl il!1 NI !'il 'I =. I/i[ ii', - ----- I I li'l I ' :::: :::::::: - - I li!1 - -:: -,. , i -"'"~~--- 11:1 I --:: ::::::- - Ii, --r~"'4'-_ :!,!i ! - -~':;"::-'::;"i?_ j'l - _..r....!. _, I r-'--P I ;-------------- .- L I ~ ': ~1J"e, ~'~~, \;' lii~'!'~';' ,\ I .~~, ~:;i \\ /1 ~ Iii \ ~,-)! '~ill f ----t ----~---~ ': i_____ t-- I : i i~ / I, I I ":" 1/'. ' " k. Iff::.' ",,;;. ~~-'-:..I' 'JL' /, /.' !II =, '. Ii . , . I I~ I~' o o '" 1= ! ;~ I "P' - I '- I, ~ I n I i , I i I , , I , , I , , I i I I I I I I I "- :1 ;' '} , - , , E d I~'TH 4Vt:. NW 0: (.J '" 0;2 ~ QI~TH AVI:. ,... ~ :;; o >-~ I::: ~:J: 1'3AO AVf. NW ....i !l!~~(: "" .....-. ? ~~~ ~ lSZND AVE. NW (I)"!J.... to- i~ ~ ";- -'i..., U 1'1 ST AVE. NW - J f-- 1 (i / ~ 1 ~I / : K ~ I ~ ~ lVA:- ~ ~~~ '-...J/ 'IPOND, ~. _ ff "l f i I 01 /: _ o 0 ~ff I I ;;: ----------~-~----- L_________i_________. I 1_. ,I~ ROLL/NG'\F08EST , 'I:, I '\' , I ~,\:2, Ai U ' / ,/ ' ~ - . I " \' \ ' / M ~!II ---------_-~. _ 1;tl>Arb~h-1 /1 i I ~ II I-,----~ 1"'-- (,ii, II [' ~ -_-_ I I ~ i I d , 1// I -.:-.:- - - ~ I I l f -----, -- -/r _ _ _---:.=-: h II ~/ I ~ --'--t~: I i: , II~' , II 10-/ I . h~~~/' 1,( ~ : "= I , ~1, II I ! \ \ II 1'1.: ----j I ::-'~~-LlII-1 I~\ A,! _ I "H-tJ.:-j ,'- "''''--- ii~: I I I I I ""'':-~\ I' 0 r ,-.e-::~ " J/II:: i 'f' I, - 1\ II ':, - -- 1 I IIF ------1 ,r~A~~ i/ il -'HOCL7)ff" ) ~ I ,[, I- 7 I I 11' c....:... - c.J 1 01 - I 13 ~.,..,..--,;. .;.. ~11;""-;b II I.. I' ,I ~~ nJ ~,;:;; ~ -n ~\ ) , ~ IT-; ''-"E.!"N~ : il I \-l........L =- -;- ~DOJ ~Pl(:. . : "d _ 'l 1...------- l "'- o o. ~ "; I I _ ( ~! ~r II ...'.....~....~,..,'....ror c. ~ i :Pa.rey'; ~ " . l , , ~-~ -t-LI./l.il.: I F=8' ....::?~ U'~l' ~ Ii I K<;: ~~ , ---"-Pc;> .n f-- : --- . ___ J I ~4TH AVE. NW 173110 AV[. NW mHO AVE.. NW mST AVE. NW I70TH AVI!. NW JetTM AVE. NW 168TH AVE. "'W IS1TH AVE. NW "TH AVE. HW , 16,TH AVE. NW I64TH AVE. NW I6JRO AY[. NW I62NO AVE. NW IO'ST AVE. NW I60TH AVE. NW I 19TH AVE. NW I5ITH AVE. NW 1,7TH AYE. NW i I,.TH AV(. NW I,OTH AVE. N'It I ,\ ,/, . .Jr...... ~(,.----p I ~ .,' '~3_ . ',~ t'- \ Z 'S . ~ , ,:,i J 'J"DD --:.....'...:.. : '1-- ~. '~~r-' ~.. I.. ~1'f.J ~ I " ''':';'', .. ,,,51" : 1 ~' '5' I "tI:. I- f/, . . ~ . ,/f I ; ',,' 14 '. "Z:-I ' . ,; '",-,!.- ~ I .o~" ! - ' '. J~'5 ,1 I,'''! , ' ."" , ,'ztlO- I ).. ',} \ ~:IiI ~I ~l!.\ i I I \ n \ : \ I , i , I I i 1 ~ ----t----- "-'-.."" i - ~ -\ --~I ! "'!1:<~,,\ -\ , ~~/"I'.!,," '~<", -""""J~~--~ ii \ --::::::::::-r--~.::~~.J.u;; ili ~ -~~~~~ -..... ~~ l r.__ ~... I , I I I , II i I, ; Ii; I - , \ I ! , rVI \ ~ 1,/ I ~. I I 3 I A I [T'Garc.& --'" ;J H' III lill1hll I I I _.......,........_~..,.o .~C()~J'") 1:';.1"" A~ \.\' rl -lQrt-~ '1 II --1 ~ '" ~ ~~~ IW\'DJ ! ,"""~. -~: ~ :""'1'- II I' i---' "-- "'" , "'" . I ~ 'II Il J \ t-----------J\ -- --": \ __ II, : \ r --~,--~ ~,~ i -- i. I!I: ~/',~ I I. ........ I 1 1:li I I '-. I ., .~"'nn: 1 _"-"n______I____~- - :I'I"I'.'~,AI"." I ,NlfiNnNfiAU ,SEC'f)II() ADDITION ,1 ~ "" ....<>-, 'I I I ~ I 'Z...... I,ll ' . NIGHnNGALE I ti I I ,---" _ E~TAfE~: /, EST~TES, ~ I ~ I i:: ~ I OAI( .\ />.., : . ~ I I 1"-" 1,1 I : 11 ~ ,! \ I::: _ __L ___l_ _ : ,'-., i '!I I, -l------:: A'I. · ,- I :: .,', "--.........! Ii I \ ,CITY:: " I ~ III I II 11 \ I rALL:: \ "--........ II , ----~------------- I :i~ I I ~~:I : : : I I 'I , : , I I II : U, :: I ,II, '.... I : , I ',.,:! I : .. : lC" I ,:, I {,I- :~~_""'/'IOII~/'~.'/I . I ::~. 1""'10"'4. oz/l ;: , -::==1 , z, --..::::: , " I' !I ~ I [, LUNt : : j OAK ~,', 'F " I iil-'- B'4 I , -'--- _ :' -. '" I II', -+-4 Uo.'''' I lr-c..=-: . , I " r' .... ,--il'~~'f"!'0 K!:Lr----' ""n- ""', ----~ -'- .c.. Ii' "./"".,.,. .",.,,1 i I II' I . 'ES;A,:rs~ : 1~.~RTFiEL'S': ! i ,!,! " ,_____I I ~ ' iii - ! : I '.,"'-"?F-'!(~'>'rI ,'I I' I '=1 __.v I U' '!"- I-c- \ I ! . ....~ '1' . ' I J f.:l-' ~., IT' I 'i~ I KENSANGTON I I n I.. i ! I "'v""" '.,"1 J '~11-' I: - ~. t-;: I' I r ! UTArES', , I I' I ~ I, I ~. r;o I . .~~~~!~~ /~ -[\1-;1.'1 II I ( \1 V1~~;1P..@ :~ ~I// i -..............! 11II I: "\ r.\~ ';:rr. ' ~. '-- - ro> ~/~~ .' . I' '.:, \ H "'~'";1.)i... l~ >;:. . \: l(.~ ~ /~'~H~d I ';:"0, 1 ," ..-. r , I I II~ I ,~ !I I, I ---li!i \ h 111\- I II -- -\- III! I. 1 Ii" ill _ 1'1 ;: ,Ii ': I I 1,- -- I i!~ I I:: I IIi-- ' "- I I II-~ i'l !I-''''- I ! '[ ~~ \\ ' i.~. " ~ " ' ----' I I I I I , I ;;;" 'j' """\' , , , t-- ~:::J ,:>. :y ~--------- 'i~S. I ~ \1 \ i III ~ lcJl I i I' . 'I' !I I' " " I: ill i Ii \ ,--.J ~~::, rJ ~ II ...... ~ ,;,'-. . ~,~~ :5:~ ,.. ""'t,.; - f: ~ rI~D~~l~~ II 1 ~l ~;;:~'~::~f~~~:"":""~"'."'>. . '~,.' . ,"" ",:""";,,,,, , ~::11 "---1J ! '''7 . ~., "- '-.." ,''':;,': . .: .: "~ :'~,j>~""".: f~!t - i ! 1 ." -.,,'- ;;." ~-~V~...,r~~\~~~~ .tt" ~ 1'ii"1'l. '? ~ "\ ~~, I _ :::: '~:"'~I;"'~~ : '~. ~~ ~. i ~J CROO~7J;E~'W!l: . ".~ '~. .~~~~ \ i ~I 1------';----- /r ' , ----- ~ .. - I _uJ ~.....,_.:..::::::; \';: ~~ i! ' -....-,".~' ',,,~~,.~";' . ~1:B:.gt~ ! I I -__..... ~f-:- ~:t. ~ \ ,... ~.. . .lHs ~ ~ - ~~ "'//Tl ': ""-----"--!r: ~ ~I-,- -: ~, ].':.... i~~ I'<~ti 2~~~\\~1.~..' I ~/ t=-",Y 't:::='~'~ '-_%'..' - , 'I'"''~''' .i,!' - J;I!:' ~. IV :J...' .1'';- F c-c- h c-. ~-~~q'lu'~-~-~if:~-4~: :~~~ . i i r"m'hh, I - ;:;- 1:mE~l" c: '~,. ,g -;-,'" 1 'I -.-... r~m:l ~ I ,'.' I. C;:,... .!.-' i ' --:::.... . . ,");. ~.... . I.~. LL~:::!":"": I I I'I~;: ~l.~~s':~.-:cC:':.1 I, ,:~t?":: I. I I ....~,I;!I...II ~,:--~~p."o ~ .;~ ", .' . .- \I I, I /I I -;: I~::::: ~\ ';;'~~;-~!:I II I '0./ :>.(. "- "..,..~~ ,y'~':::- ~...--- -, "";<: , 'i:;' I? I I .. _ ....... ~ ~ ~ lIoi . ~ -+-= ,,'tl'o...:..... :"P' !: ~ :. -1- - -- hn_ ,"'" ~,.\..~I... .,.. ' ~ . ,~,' '. , I -t r.-:-; --;;--"a~i: ~ ~... . '~" ,~"V"". -, I , , ',. . ~ ''J:. .-..,...,, ~, ' ',. I :ci:i:: :~~Fo:":'~" ','''li~ : I 'II)' ~~,._"'..\ I "'r. ~ .11/.o-i"'II'~" '. ~<~""I ~I" ,. I -., ';:::;0 Pi"Kr..L3,J ~ ,;, ,m' ~ .... - ...(,7, .". . .,. m m, ~,. '. ,I c......;__~n. ...., . ~ ,..,,~ .', : ...." !ill ~.: ;,;;;;.,:,:~ R', ~'f,':J!. ~",~'N'~~ ~ --- _ ~ ~ .>1 ~~M ..' "'" L.......:-: I,' . ..' ,-,.~flY" ':'. ,..;. :: : ?'Y~'C~, " " ~Vir, ,:..: : : .. ~ .. ...... : );7..-'!7a,',,~,~,.. ~ : ,. ~.:;~ I ,,,.,,., '" . . .... <i ~I:--\ ' " 'j ;..~~;Ti;~~::~.:i -- :f~'~~'.':~tv::,"~: I '71 --- -----. , :::!i'., <"::'''''"''.~J-'- ;;,' I :1.1"il:(1" "".;::::\:-;-=.. : . .. - : :,>!",..2. :-,. '. .' ~~.<. I: r-- : ~:: ;,.",'</?I I ,'''........~ n: - /.,...,.,=1 'I."I"~I".,'\J I _ -1. ~......_ I' I Li ~ ',' ; / '.h;lIJrlI I '.7 (;) I~ . h.1 . C) . ~ . -: i:=:"":" . ~ '~'. ,~!. . C') ~ i h '1; I '.~ 'I~(j). I:~. . I' ! 1 JU~l~=~ - ~- nn---L--_--::~ --- KLm~. ~ := =-L~,~:;J rw I II...:J I <,\'"L JIf." i '~'i- ~ ' I: I II~!;III.: I' .." i ~ : II, - - / I \ .",...,,,, ~~~ . -j >- . ~ . i . .. ...________u i I ~ -:11:- .:;'i,<:. I ~~-<r- ~I[' ~ ~ 1tn'1........ ...-,= ..~ -7 ~: ~_ :::~.\ / i I ~~ . ~ ~ ':":~~p~ Ii ! '~~~.'~~ . 'Yo." r.~ ;;o~ j~~. -+ ' ."'{( -~ .. I ',"~.'{.:;~~"~.:l:IiJ I ; ---- 1---- , J--' I I ,,,""I.~~~.~"';:'; I I 1'~':~1~~ I c ....,.,;,,'...,,~..'..~t I I I t-~i., -7~--.- .'8 'r' ",..;" r' . -7- f ' ~ I j / .. I . . . I . >r . 'I' ~ b.!~ ,~ . I 4~ )5;_ .-j~- .... . ) " :;;;~ ';: ~.~ '" :'-'. S~ 4.-4 ?:1lI fH---- (f.IO .. 1;1 l'>~ ;;;; ~< .....", :r.-.,~ N "- I ( (") ;:) 1.11, I I I I a -------t------ I I I I I I ; =_! .~ ~i. I I I I ',,~ . ,~ -' .~ L ,..... I A f- I I - I '.:.;;.-. ',""~{~""'"""-"""""'~' ,.<, ." ,7 "\. N '\1i, ~1 ~ , ~l tt ) ~ ~ '-J ~~, ..Ie; "'" ",,' ~~:~4 CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE 'Fphrll~TY 1 Q . 1 QQl ~J.M Charter Commission 17. BY: v, Volk ~~, ~~~7{1" BY/ / AGENDA SECTION NO. Staff, Committee, Comm. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Admin. On March 3, 1990 the City Council reappointed the following to the Charter Commmission for four-year terms: d'Arcy Bosell Lyle Bradley Mike Knight Bob Peach The terms for the above will expire on November 3, 1993. Attached is a listing of the commissioners along with the expiration dates for their terms. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY '\ '-J 9\ CITY of ANDOVER Andover Charter Commission Chair Jerry Windschi t1 3640 - 152nd Lane N.W. Andover, MN 55304 421-9217 Term Expires 11/3/91 vice-Chair d'Arcy Bose11 2942 - 181st Avenue N.W. Cedar, MN 55011 753-3085 Term expires 11/3/93 Commissioners Lyle Bradley 15202 - 7th Avenue N.W. Andover, MN 55304 421-1663 Term expires 11/3/93 Mike Knight 4622 - 175th Avenue N.W. Andover, MN 55304 421-9247 Term expires 11/3/93 Bob Peach 15830 University Avenue N,W. Andover, MN 55304 434-9358 Term expires 11/3/93 Gretchen Sabel 3540 - 153rd Avenue N.W, Andover, MN 55304 427-5593 Term expires 11/3/91 Charles Veiman 13646 Crooked Lake Boulevard Andover, MN 55304 757-2520 Term expires 11/3/91 ) ,./~,( "",c.,,''''',,\, <C' .':\ :~, ';;1;. ~ ~ ',,'1 !.;i ;":. ,'.} .J;, .1 . ""\",.,...,,,~_,,~,,.,,iffl' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 19, 1991 ITEM NO. IS. Receive January Financial statements Howard D. Koolick ~ BY: Finance Director :~~f::;OR ByJO / ~g~ND~ob~qJ!~~ussion Items ORIGINI\TING DEPARTMENT Flnance REQUEST The Andover City Council is receive the January 1991 financial statements for the General, Water and Sewer Funds. please note that this report includes only the active in January relating to 1991. Expenditures and revenues which related to 1990 were charged against the 1990 budget in accordance with proper accounting principles. The exception to this rule is water and sewer revenue which will be credited to 1990 prior to the April billing. Should there be any questions about an item, please contact me prior to the meeting so that I may have adequate time to research the question. MOTION BY TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o CITY OF ANOOVJ::R YEAR TO DATE S~MMARIES FOR GENERAL. WATER AND SEWER FUNDS __u _ _As__of___31.1an9,L_________________ Revised ___ Buc:jg<;n1:_,__ Year to Date Percentage ___,____' _ _Ac tU.3L__:~~rnaj nJJ19_ _ --------------- -------------- ---------- G ENE R A L FUN D REV E N U E S ----------------------- ______._ - __.____.___ - ___ _._ _._ -u- ,-.-.-_""'-______ GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES ____8 U SIN E-S..$- LI.C.EN,g ES_ AND_I=' I::RMLTS____, NON-8USINESS LICENSES & PERMITS Building Related 199,910,00 5.244,75 Out he_~ ' __ _______~_~oo_._~()___~___4:....L~ INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 649,573.00 510,00 CHARGES FOR SERVICES " _ _____S.:tr..ee_tuLL:;lllt-U1.9-____ ----- Other COURT FINES ,,___S_ 2J:J::I8.L_ AS~~E_SSl1..El~ TS__ ~___ MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE Interest Earned _ _________Re_fund5-_d nd-.Rejmb uc..s,eme n ts_____ Other TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS ___.fr9_TD AdrrJi n, Trust Fund__ From TIF 1-1 Fund From TIF 1-2 Fund 1,072,643,00 34.470,96 96 _1 8<-20Q_LOO_________J <-3_75.0_0 _n__92 97 91 99 __5__1 L5_00_, 0_0_ _______4_LL8_4,_4_9 20,850,00 628,45 59.000,00 2.680,18 91 96 95 30.000,00 __3.0;000.00_ 4.300.00 100 --.l.O 0 95 181.00 90.000.00 ---. 24,000,00 6,000.00 100 100 100 ,. ~;" TOTAL REVENUE 2,261.576,00 49,745,83 97 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ .J ,~ CITY OF ANOOVtO:R ~EAR TO DATE SUMMARIES FOR GENERAL. WATER AND SEWER FUNDS ,~__~______u_~____nAS_o.f_--3-t.Ja 119-1------ ------' Revised Year to Date Percentage __________~udge t~,________Ac~t uaL-~ Rema ini,l19____ --------------- -------------- ---------- G ENE R A L FUN 0 E X PEN D I T U RES ----------------------- ----------------------- ___u__._. _ __ _ ._"._____ ---. .--- -- - . -----------_.-.-._--------------_._----------_._--~-- ----- CITY COUNCIL ____N E..W 5.LE...LTER MAYOR ELECTIONS __~ADt-:LIt-LI5H.BT I_Ot-! FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION AUDITING ., ___ASS~_SnLG ATTORNEY PLANNING AND ZONING ____QATA PROCESSING CITY HALL BUILDING FIRE STATION BUILDING ,____R.UB.LIC_ WORK5-.B Jil.LD~U~.G....- SENIOR CITIZEN'S CENTER EQUIPMENT BUILDING I;_N Glt-l EJ:KIJJ G POLICE PROTECTION FIRE PROTECTION _--RES_C.ll.LSER'LI!' E PROTECTIVE INSPECTION CIVIL DEFENSE AIUMAL.CmUROL STREETS AND HIGHWAYS SNOW AND ICE REMOVAL S T rl.RM-SE.WE..P c; STREET LIGHTING STREET SIGNS TRAE.El_C SIGNALC: STREET LIGHTS-BILLED PARK AND RECREATION T R..E.E5-AN D-W.rrD-CmIT..R.Q L RECYCLING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT UNALLOCATED IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS OTHER FINANCING USES 34,213.00 1,342,60 96 ,______6_.83_1._00___,___ __ ,____~____~LO Om________ 4,200.00 180,86 95 ~______1.P_~,.ll,LJLO__________8, _2_6_0 '-.5 i>_~______Q.2 _m___ 102.891.00 7,733.92 92 10,000,00 100 3.J.....L~QO_. 00 3 3,,6'f.1., _O,O_~___ ( 6 ) 60,600,00 100 51.002,00 3.364.99 93 1 9 , 84 5 , 00 4 . 7 1 0 , 74___ _n -.lu~___ 35.833.00 793.33 97 14.190.00 260.94 98 2L_60,O_LOO______t. 025uS3 , 95 9,635,00 86.80 99 3,593.00 100 71,1~5,OO 4.541,41 93 404.078,00 15.54 99 256,652.00 13.307.67 94 3 9_,,-O_53_._0_0__3---,_13L9_,_Q 6__99 127,530.00 9.327.98 92 2,400,00 100 9 ,,-Ol6___0 0 7 2 ~,_QO~__9_f______ 227,799,00 3,758,06 98 130,352.00 7,901,24 93 ? 2 .ji2..L~O_O 2.2-0_._LP__9Q 15,000.00 100 31,606.00 642,06 97 3 &OJL..-.O_O--~O-Q 38,000,00 100 231,897.00 8,838.80 96 9 ,,-4..L6_,_0_O 51 ,_2 3 9_9 37,129.00 620,13 98 16,544,00 1.220,18 92 61,070,00 24.879.00 59 / , 12,800.00 (159.02) 101 ~J TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2.261.576,00 141,450.69 93 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ CITY OF ANDOVER _ _YE:AR, TO DAJL.SUJ>1MARIE:~;__ FOR GENERAL, WATER AND SEWER FUNDS _~__~__As~ of__3,LJa n9...1 o Revised _____~_G uc:jg,et Year to Date Percentage ______Act u..3 L_____~,~m.3jlJi.Dg_ ~__ -------------- ---------- W ATE R FUN 0 REV E N U E S ------------------- ------------------- _~_... _____ ___u_ _____ ____________. --- WATER SALES 198,072.00 MET E R__SALES____~_____~ ~__________,__2 0 ._0_0_0,_0,0 PERMIT FEES 10,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 5,000.00 12,533.56 93 $A_0--,---00___~9 5 350.00 96 100 FUN 0 G ENE R A L TOT AL__RE-"'-U:!.!-L~_________.2 3 3 &7~_~_0 iL____Jl_ .n3._,_~fj_~___~~____ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ W ATE R FUN 0 E X PEN S E S ------------------- ------------------- -----~------~----~-------------_.---- ------ ------_._~---~------- SOURCE. STORAGE AND TREATMENT D I_S.JJU_BJJ.lIO.fJ ADMINISTRATION 76,495.00 112_,-3_8),00 44.195,00 100,00 3,269,76 1,569,58 99 97 96 TOTAL WATER FUND EXPENSES 233,072,00 4,939.34 97 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ :) ~-J CITY OF ANOO'lER YEAR TO. DATEnSUMMARIU, FOR GENERAL. WATER AND SEWER FUNDS _ ~-----A-;:>--- of - --3.-1 J.3 n 9-L--.-'--------------------' Revised __Bud'3eI__ Year to Date Percentage _______AcJ:_ua 1", ____nR.=ma i ni n9 -------------- ---------- SEW E R FUN D REV E N U E S ------------------- ------------------- SEWER CHARGES 360.469,00 _ __INI ER E..S.T_____~______________ _,~___n___ L. 00 Q~_O 0 . TRANSFER FROM SEWER CONN. FUND 30.500.00 31.561.09 91 __100 100 _TOIA LSE.WE.LR EY.EWJ E 3_9_L'-9_6_9_,_0_0____~3_t., 5 pJ 'nO 9_ ____ 9 L__~__ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ SEW E R FUN D LL.LLN---,S__ EnS -------------------- -------------------- COLLECTION Metropolitan Waste Control othe~EJ(p_eJ1_s_e_s ADMINISTRATION 243.781.00 70~32.00 77,456.00 20.315.00 2.734,83 1.492,32 91 96 98 TOTAL SEWER EXPENSES 391.969,00 24.542.15 93 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ , , .) 'l~,</"""."'e.,~",\"" Aj'" "\. ~;:) ~i '.cl,.., ~'i , ~ ~ ", " .,J "'1r" if "'~. .,.;;.. "'-,,#''' CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION February 19, 1991 AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. 1'1. Approve Engineering Rates/Bonestroo BY: James E. Schran z Non-Discussion Items Engineering The City Council is requested to approve the proposed engineering rates for Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates for the year 1991. Attached is a letter from BRA explaining the increase. The rates are reasonable. I recommend approval. MOTION BY 'j TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY .,J ~ -. 1\]1 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Otto G. Bonesrroo. FE. Robert W. Rosene. P.E. Joseph C. Anderlik. FE. Marvrn L. Sorvala. FE. Richard E. Turner. PE. James C. Olson. PE. Glenn R. Cook, P,E. ThOmas E. Noyes. PE. Robert G. Scl1uniCht FE. Susan M. Eberlin. C.PA Keith A. Gordon. PE. Richard W. Foster. PE. Donald C. Burgardt PE. Jerry A. Bourdon, PE. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Ted K. Field. PE. Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. Robert R. Pfefferle. PE. Davk1 0. Loskota. PE. ThOmas W Peterson. P.E. Micnael C. LynCh, PE. James R. Maland. P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson. P.E. Mark R. Rolfs. PE. Robert C. Russel(. A.l.A. Thomas E. Angus. PE. HOIN"ard A. Sanford. PE Daniel J. Edgerton. P.E. Mark. A. SeiP. P.E. Philip J. CaS\Nell. P.E. Ismael Martinez. P.E. Mark D. Wallis, PE. Thomas R. Anderson. A.l-^. Gary F. Rylander. P.E. Miles B. Jensen. P.E. L Phillip Gravel HI, FE. Rene C. Plumart. A.IA Agnes M. Ring. A.ICP. Jerry D. Perttsch. P.E. CeCIlia Olivier. P.E. Robert R. DreblOw. P.E. Gal)' W. Marien, P.E. Charles A. ErickSOn Leo M. Pao.velSky Harlan M. orson Engineers & Architects January 15, 1991 -- 'I,~ t~; [~ "f EJl ri~,I-~>:;~;'~'~' t ~-(~~'ll.!4 ...'"" .<o.J".,J t~ ,~ Honorable M~yor and City Cc~ncil City of Andover 1685 Crosstown Blvd. Anoka. MN 55303 CITY OF i\i'!DOVER Attn: Mr. James Schrantz Re: 1991 Rate Honorable Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith are revised hourly Engineering Rates which are to be effective January I, 1991, We have limited the increase in our rates to less than 5.0 percent, We have appreciated our relationship with the City of Andover and we are all looking forward to serving you in 1991. If you have further questions on the enclosed rate schedule. please call. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~(YX,~~ c::. Otto G. Bonestroo OGB:mb Encl. , ) 24 .... ----/ 2335 West Highway 36 · St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 . 612-636-4600 . ) ,~ 1991 SCHEDULE B CLASSIFICATION HOURLY RATE Senior Principal $70,00 $60.50 Principal/Project Manager Registered Engineer/Architect $55.00 Project Engineer/Architect $50,00 Graduate Engineer/Architect/Field Supervisor $45,00 Senior Draftsperson $40.50 $37,25 Senior Technician Technician $27.00 Word Processor $27.50 Clerical $20.00 The above rates will be multiplied by 1.3 for review of private developers plans and inspection of private work to cover professional liability insurance costs and legal expense. Reimbursable Expenses - At Cost Reproduction. Printing, Duplicating Out-of-Pocket Expenses such as stakes, field supplies, telephone calls, etc. Mileage ~) Andover ';l~{~"'''''~~'''''''~\\ / ~ 11'.,. } V\.. ....-tf ',,>,,;/ '....._""" CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE Februarv 19. 1991 ITEM Adopt Resolution/State NO. ~O. Aid Cuts Howa rd D. Kooli ck tD<-.- BY: Finance Director APPROVED I~R AGE~A \~ BY: / V j AGENDA SECTION NO. Non-Discussion Items ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Finance REQUEST The Andover City Council is requested to approve the attached resolution opposing further reductions in state aid and authorize the Mayor, City Administrator or Finance Director to forward copies to our state legislators, the governor's office and the local media. BACKGROUND The League of Minnesota Cities is encouraging all cities to adopt resolutions similar to this to inform the legislature and governor of our opposition to further cuts in state aid to cities, In 1990, the state cut local government aid to the City of Andover by $22,516. This cut was made after the City had adopted its budget, leaving the City to fund the difference through an additional transfer from the Administrative Trust Fund. Recently, the state legislature approved a bill to deal with the $197 million state 1991 budget shortfall. This bill reduced our local government aid by approximately $30,270. The state will be dealing with the projected 1991-1993 shortfall of $1.2 billion in the near future. This resolution will inform Governor Carlson and our legislators, who both voted yes to the aid cut, of our opposition to any further cuts in aid. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY "- ) TO SECOND BY o CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANORA STATE OF MINNESOTA RES. NO. R -91 A RESOLUTION OPPOSING FURTHER REDUCTIONS IS STATE AID TO CITIES. WHEREAS, state aid helps fund basic city services for the City of Andover and aid cuts would force large property tax increases and/or threaten cuts is these services; and WHEREAS, many city services are essential - such as police and fire protection, emergency rescue services and street maintenance - and affect citizen's health and safety and we believe, the state has an interest and responsibility to help finance these services; and WHEREAS, if property taxes increased as a result of aid cuts, the tax disparity between adjoining cities could widen causing great taxing inequities and we believe, the state has a responsibility to ensure a reasonable level of equity in its tax system; and WHEREAS, the City of Andover, as well as all cities in the state, have already faced large aid cuts; in 1989, $85 million in aid was shifted from cities to school districts; in 1990, city aid was permanently cut by $15.6 million and the $30 million local government aid inflation adjustment was eliminated for Pay 1991 and all future years; for 1992, another $29 million in local aid cuts are expected to meet the budget reduction target in the 1990 tax bi 11; and WHEREAS, the City of Andover opposes Governor Carlson's plan to cut local government aid (LGA) and homestead and agricultural aid credit (HACA) by $21 million to solve the $197 million state budget shortfall; and WHEREAS, cities are not the cause of the current budget crisis, and cities, like Andover, have proven to be frugal spenders as shown by per capita spending in 1989 virtually unchanged from its level in 1980; and WHEREAS, while state spending on higher education, welfare and state agencies has increase significantly, local government aid and property tax relief funding have become smaller portions of state spending. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby demands that state aid to cities be maintained at current levels, \ '-~ o . ) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that additional reductions in property tax relief programs or tightening of levy limits for Pay 1991-1993 will require the City of Andover to raise property taxes and/or will seriously affect our ability to provide vital services to our citizens, BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby requests our members of the Minnesota State Legislature to oppose reductions in state aid to cities, tightening of levy limits or reductions based on fund balances. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of February, 1991. 19th CITY OF ANDOVER ATTEST: Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor Victoria Volk, City Clerk l'~'("<';"'''C'''~''""" ;~~_.,,-;~~~, :..);;':."'.' Ii . ~, ''" ,if 1'\ CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE February 19, 199 I AGENDAuSECTION . NQ Non-D1scuss1on Items APPROV~ED FOR AGENDA .y,~/ / The City Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution proclaiming the week of March 3-10, 1991 as Volunteers of America Week in Andover. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Admin. ITJ.M Volunteers of America :1,. Proclamation BY: \ \. V. Volkt. v Attach. MOTION BY '- TO COUNCIL ACTION SECOND BY o .J CITY OF ANDOVER COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NO. R A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MARCH 3 - 10, 1991 AS VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER. WHEREAS, Volunteers of America is one of the nation's and Minnesota's largest human service organizations; and WHEREAS, Volunteers of America has been helping others for nearly 95 years; and WHEREAS, Volunteers of America is celebrating its 95th year of service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Andover hereby proclaims the week of March 3 - 10, 1991 as VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK IN THE CITY OF ANDOVER. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day of , 1991. CITY OF ANDOVER Attest: Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor victoria Volk - City Clerk '':';''''''':''<:<'1<... .~~' :p" '\, /1' 3' ",~ ,~ ~ ;.)\ J ~'\.,~,,~~;~li' '~"""'-I~"?""" CITY OF ANDOVER REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION NO. DATE February 19, 1991 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ~5MApprove stop Sign/147th ~i, Lane & Guarani street ~ Engineering BY: Todd J. Haas The City Council is requested to approve the installation of stop signs at the intersection of 147th Lane and Guarani street in the Lund's Round Lake Estates area. Attached are letters from the Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 Director of Transportation and a property owner living in the area. Also included are the warrants for stop signs and a accident report that occurred in January 1991. The warrants for stop signs would be identified under Item #4 relating to restricted view. The SE and NW quandrant is obstructing the view due to the existing high ground. It is recommended by staff to place stop signs for the north- south bound traffic. 147th Lane is the main feeder street to the area. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY '-- TO SECOND BY :..J 2~ VVarrants for Stop Sign Because the STOP sign causes a substantial inconvenience to motorists, it should be used only where warranted. A STOP sign may be warranted at an intersection where one or more of the fol- lowing conditions exist: 1. Intersection of a less important road with :J. main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule is unduly hazardous. 2. Street entering a through highway or street. 3. Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. 4:, Other intersections where :J. combination of high speed, re- stricted view, and serious accident record indicates a need for control by the STOP sign. STOP signs should never be used on the through roadways of expressways. Properly designed expressway interchanges provide for the continuous flow of traffic, making STOP signs unnecessary even on the entering roadways. 'Where at.grade intersections are temporarily justified for local traffic in sparsely populated areas, STOP signs should be used on the entering roadw:J.Ys to protect the through traffic. STOP signs may also be required at the end of diverging roadways at the intersection with other highways not designed as expressways. In most or these cases, the speeds will not w:J.rrant any great increase in the sign sizes. STOP signs shall not be erected at intersections where traffic control signals are operating. The conflicting co=ands of two types of control devices are confusing. If traffic is required to stop when the operation of the stop-and-go signals is not warranted, the signals should be put on flashing operation with the red flashing light bcing the traffic that must stop. Where two main highways intersect, the STOP sign or signs should normally be posted on the minor street to stop the lesser flow or traffic. Traffic engineering studies, however, may justify a deci- sion to install a STOP sign or signs on the major street, as at a three-way intersection where safety considerations may justify stop- ping the greater flow of traffic to permit a left-turning movement. For other than emergency purposes portable or part-time STOP signs shall not be used. STOP signs should not be used for speed control. .,-) " <J Jlnoka-~nnepin !independent Schoof g)ishict' 'Jlo, 11 SCHOOL BOARD Denis Kelly. Chairman Michael Sullivan Vice Chairman Jon Stonecash. Clerk John Peterson. Treasurer Maureen Gaalaas. Director Ronald Manning. Director Roberl Gander. Superintendent EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER 11299 Hanson Boulevard N.W. . Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55433 612/422-5500 1-15-91 --- ".' , . Ft;... i~-.~ '-:; .:~' :,,;..~.':.' \ ' .. '~."" .,.... ,... "-> ~ ~J li: ~x' ~.! ~~:.:; ':; ~:2 ~ it .- '"" ," . . "'~~ ----.-.-.---.~.--........-l:! .1 I '; '1; I j1 [j ,. ::";. 1 t,. '-.: 1 ,', j(jc1l ':i U I "j ,);",;': _ \) "oJ". I.~ .,. t' -f (,. , . ' ,~ TOM HAAS ASS'T, CITY ENGINEER ANDOVER CITY HALL ANDOVER,MN 55304 CITY OF /\i'IDOVER DEAR MR. HAAS: THIS LETTER IS A FOLLOW UP TO OUR CONVERSATION TODAY REGARDING THE INTERSECTION OF 147TH LANE AND GUARANI ST. NW IN ANDOVER. AS I INDICATED, THERE WAS A SCHOOL BUS ACCIDENT AT THIS INTERSECTION ON MONDAY AFTERNOON, 1-14-91, IN WHICH THE SCHOOL BUS WAS STRUCK IN THE SIDE AS IT TRAVELLED NORTH ON GUARANI ST, BY A VEHICLE TRAVELING WEST ON 147TH LN.. BOTH DRIVERS COMMENTED ON THE LACK OF VISIBILITY AT THIS INTERSECTION DUE TO THE GRADE AND SLIGHT CURVE IN 147TH LN. THE SHERIFF THAT WROTE THIS ACCIDENT MENTIONED THAT THIS SCHOOL BUS ACCIDENT, WHICH OCCURRED AT 4:10PM, WAS THE THIRD ACCIDENT AT THAT INTERSECTION THAT DAY. I WENT TO THE ACCIDENT SCENE THIS MORNING WITH DIANE MCCALL, SAFETY DIRECTOR AT KOTTKES' BUS SERVICE,INC.. WE BOTH FELT THAT ALTHOUGH THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL AREA OF LIMITED TRAFFIC VOLUME, IT WOULD GREATLY IMPROVE THE SAFETY OF MOTORISTS AND SCHOOL CHILDREN RIDING BUSES IN THIS AREA IF A TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE SUCH AS A STOP SIGN WERE PLACED AT THIS INTERSECTION. PLEASE REVIEW AND INSPECT THIS INTERSECTION AND LET ME KNOW THE CITY'S POSTICN ON THIS REQUEST. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. SINCERELY, ../1, ~I J., r I . I // ' ;,~/ CHUCK HOLDEN DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION ANOKA-HENNEPIN SCHOOL DISTRICT 422-5606 , , # 11 CC: DIANE MCCALL:SAFETY DIRECTOR, KOTTKE BUS SERVICE,INC. ) FILE "Every Student Will Learn" PK:>G I .......... ,~ COLLEGE PROSPECTS OF AMERICA, INC. "OPENING DOORS TO COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP OPPORTUNITIES" VEil/( ~0V /~ II-'l( / :f 11m 4JRII;;Jr;. 7"0 /NfO/U'1 !e:) or II VIJIJGf;?.o<J::; S;7Ul!tiO;J ;N jJ? r /,JE;G/(I3JRj(; ON1} A rGtJ }/ujVll/2€D /Et3'/ //f!un /h( jiv,115' /5 ;IN -O.lll"M,f/2,t6D /1 /~/E/C- 5E'cilONj /17 /1i 1!!. LI.J. "f G /Jt.J/(71NI 5-::. 7';;5 /5 .,f g~,/;I(J INTEI:- 5t:='cl/orJ iJECl/vSE Or j/;G'}I L/i'tiI/?5cA'/E ON -rilE /IJ:..u Cu.N!NEI'? 4;';0 StE ,/ CORNER. I iv/i); /'Ill IIEto of( S7o,P 5/tf/.J ,ro/? /RA'/'hc. C,;/J?/N6- rJ?J/ /9>? of 1 VI!?bC7/aiJ ~ /T /s (),...;t.'1 /! /llA7I:E"1( 0'/ ~/J1E tf'E'/l/er .J;/71E'OI'!!- /s 5tf'-Je/aus!.,! )N,JUt<E.O O)?, );LJEO AT /)(15 /AlTE.R5Ec'f/,j;./~ ;Z JIJ.5T /i?JN"D OV7 7');1/1 A Sc;/o,Oi., l3u:) IlIJo jJ;c~-iJP /:fUCK JlAO ;fill ~ :fz7 Acc-IVE/-J'i AT II/IS INi,oe5EcTlo;J cJ!t'<1.lER 7//15 /dEt<.' ,hIJl:) /'\E'QUc~; - / - ,-, 'T)lJ/7 A I/ELt? S/G'~ AT /}1/).//mtJ,/ tic /,(tfcE!) 4r 1/(15 /tVTE~5EcT/tJ," BE/'b-eE ./l /J1,~E >>;Q/tJu5 ~CCIPENT QCct.J,e,S. l' };/Y;;~ D12/VWJJ 11 /llIlP ON 1tVE 6t9cJr:. of TII/s SJ/E€T wiTH A /'UR7'(/E/? DC::ScR I PT/aN ' S Hau i.. D )'ou NM~ ilN! I'UI<.7J1E;<, -:3:23 ~ OJ 51. QuE'0TioNS, ,/ h'SSE C/lJ.L m~ AT .., E ,,::-;,;;:,~-""'T;o. 'j) j ~ ,~. Ii.., ~l "if ",.. ~ ~,J.~ rr 1} ~ ~.~ 1a J :] ""'.' , 11' '1 1 1 , ~ ~ Jl :,,1 "'11.... ."'1 " ,-' ,; , ,., 'J ')! ,-,,, I. ~ If _4' ",' I. _'OJ....... ~ -1 -- r ..-J /).; G('=!cEL// /q/~ " ) CITY OF Ai'!DOVE~ 0~ "'<: , ) N PAtbE2..... ;.\ J:- .\ I . ~ [4' '" <N."'I/ .1 @-- )-, v'1 ! , :> y jClG '5i&N NEED;; I;) f3E. PJ.flcED y iE~C SI!;''.! i'JiOECE.O r: - , "=2~ "<::' ~i -::>: "<:' ~: 5 ;;DO i }0(; \ c-l\U L Si~JC.f; f/!v ~T jRIi((tC. } 5 TI<~'/G:L/tJr;. /:-1'0/1 WESt I I 1'"1 1.!2 f1 (r '-" /' C ,...- r'-/7~f?'1 TOr Fl<o/?1. I /I nLc;./ AND /iJ!?.NI-,..JG- ONTo D,::''';;' ~,4U(UIM/ vi. /~ IArli'.~ i^r.~ 1177.!!..:../Af. -.0 r iJ -,' Ii' I, -, hi\) / ,IV /",!/tF/C c/)./o.Jl..)) /I~/,: liVE /Gil; Or w,?/. Jl 'IIEt.D ar< i'Jor<.THI So:;Tii. J. ES'S -r/2IlIEL~Z) ?;TJP SiGN NEE.D:] ;0 ,~ , ;),(,C:A.l a(?.. STrJP 7/21/ f"f'lC )/r!A(Ji/l1 iT IS iN ES3ENCE r#E liT (.viS /lVTEfCJe:")oN / SINcE RJfJ,O. Lv lY~RE 'SiGflJ:) A!2.E t::.;fC~-o 0'Asi/WElJT' Op., /'J:"(~T'r';;0')-;'V /s j~/ Ir- 17 5N()J...O (]~ If flEf..!J oR. 5ivP.. j';Yc }/E# /S SOf'Y!ETJ-/pJrJ:. NE.E~S /u .8C:: !Z::i!! )m/J1E.!J/47B! / ......v...... II ~ 5~cOrJ;)///2I/ ~ }):5 PRlmAR..7 JSSJE. 13~rbI2E A 7/'fIl~cJ)l /4tc~ i04cc.::: :? ON COUNT ~ ,'CO .-> G Llc....."""",. .sf rNfER:~CTION 1 OR WrTH ROUTE. II, STAEET. CORP UMIT, REF POINT OR FEATURE OF1 -n o ::D o " (fJ C (fJ m o Z '" ?S-J.2Q03..ill5...I;-91) < LOCAL CASE NO. Cj~ <f 87 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY TRAFFIC ACCIDENT REPORT (FOR POLICE USE ONLY AS REOUIRED BY STATUTE) PAGE J'/ :2.. 0 01 1'-1 Cj I I + MONTH DATE YEAR fIIT.AND-RUN o ATTENDED o UNATTENDED ROUTE SYSTEM , PUB PROP VEHICLES KIUED ROUTE NUMBER OR STREET NAME OJ.. 0CtTY DTWP 00 g~ I'-I"'"J~' 1.... /'Jw 1'71'1 c.'o UNIT 2 eg' VEHICLE DRIVER UCENSE NUMBER. 2 p. ).,'-/0_ 3Yb -/JS- 371 o PEDESTRIAN o BICYCLE STATE ClASS FACTOR I mfV f3-o I FACTOR 1 DRIVEA UCENSE NUMBER. 1 "2- K- If/] - 13 s . '8 ~"7 ' ""JOb FACTOR 2 NAME {fiRST. MIDDLE. LAST) L/G. DAle W;!li........ K..I ctf.n'c'(' MNUVER ADDRESS I Rt3 Bo~ ;l. 6'''1 PHYSCL I RCQMNQ ADDRESS {:) CORpCT VEHTYP ::L $11 mE FIRE ADDRESS N TOW CITY. STATE, ZlP N OMGLOC MAKE MODEL YEAR COLOR J r.,r~ R".",.e,. '6(, DMGSEv PlATE" STATE YEAR 3 'i7J.. OC.13 f'J1'l CII STATE ClASS RSTACTNS WTHDRWN COMPUED Nit Ii DATE OF BIRTH tw.-lE (FIRST, MIDDlE. LAST) 3..<.k 0<;0< / ADDRESS Pc, c/{;/., RSTRCTNS WTHDR'NN FACTOR 2 CNIt" N 46 oq I, ..., 13/7s CITY. STATE. ZIP (1,fj<~~.......~f DATE OF BIRTH MNU\lER ~J /\/1..,/ OS " J(.. I PHYSGL I n-,/'J RCOMNO D I DIRECT 7 13 (,,). 5" ...).. '5.4 ;>IV \lEHTYP 75Y-3/uo 15 OCCUP RRE Ii.. N DIRECT TOW N DMGUlC Z. DMGSEV z.. ko1+kc~ OCCUP ADDRESS l3 uS '10 MODEL au, 1?7 1'1 YEAR COLOR STATE YEAR .s 8 t:, <./ - 19 'f >'71'/ q / lr-tJUll(Q PASSENGEAS/WITNESSES UNIT OSTN AGE SEX EJECT nSTRNT tNJCOD TOHOSP lMNSf'QnT i F Lf I O""'-""CE - Ill!,' So>", 1'I1'ycd J3 cd 0'" 15' 33'" R",J'c Sl. ", Lv 4,J. 7. iZ,(. 2. <10 9 C. I'f aO~A --- \ Iv' - )( F - - OAMIU-'HCl" (j Cor" 'V w" Iv 11./56;;- {J/~<-Ir r.._ t <;/. AIIv '1,;}. 1- ') "i S 'f - - aOTtiER I 0"""""'" - oon,," v' - ':' 0"""""'" - OO~R ACClYP OWNER OF OTHER DAMAGED PROPERTY ANDIOR YELLOW TAG NUMBER(S) ....MBULANCE SERVlCEIS) ANDIOR STATE AM8ULANCE RUN NUM8ER\Sl It,. A ./ ,. 0 f'tI.... D,....... 70 S,,~ Ie. DESCRIPTION. CHARGES PENDING. AND OR CIT....TlONS ISSUED DEVICE FXOOBJ V"h!' I fr... oI~ Ih5 0 NOATH W..; VVC, r- 0'" I...,.", l.~ , 0 ON .:;rp",JQ~J,I.trtj 6,,--.,..'- s ~. ( U",,,,",,..,I(~J ..... tt, it'c t."",,) WORK"'" BRIOGE f'.I Vc.I...",). wA'- I r....t:. /.., h u' .J-~ ,,~ (:,,,..........: 0 LOCAm SPEED / SI Wl,c_ boT" dr-"lvOIt"" s....... 0"'. ~ ....+I,c,. UMrT ~ -tJrive.....1 P<r"'~f' +... ,~t.u J -r c. fl.w,,", # b. +-... .). ,~.. 30 ':' - -<CI - ~ .:;ppro,J_LI..,,,,,, INTREL --L "('pI",) t.... br" lie. '" ~,,( b tr> ;:2. -4 ("' ","- .j ~ J I..~. f... v"'.... ~ I br-......./i...1c.l WEATHER , I ,,- ice. RDESGN q: -+ ~, ,'~ I<(.;~ ( t",,,..,. 2. ~ . I V c..~ ~. J... .-~ t ~ PHOTOS ... , 4,.' J..~ TAAEN ..;. c!. f\I '" I LIGHT F10sunF '. if , l' I . I , RDCIWl ~ OIJ\GRAM I ;) I , " 5 i L- Oe;vc I\k/iO.., "'/03 11-.., oJ J(... C ow_-f o LOCAL o OTHER no'(lYP AXLES lHMltH UP HITCH ICllv,~rA1E.ZIP I lell , ,~.....wn