HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC November 5, 1991
DATE: November 5, 1991
,
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
"what's Happening"
Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - lO/l5/9l
Park & Recreation Minutes - lO/l7/9l
Tree Commission Meeting Minutes - lO/2l/9l
Planning and zoning Commission Minutes - lO/22/9l
Feasibility Report update re: Hidden Creek East 4th - TKDA
Safety Committee Meeting Minutes - lO/lO/9l
Coon Creek watershed Agenda lO/l4/9l
Coon Creek watershed Agenda lO/28/9l1 primary
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - lO/8/9l
Disaster Committee Minutes - l09/l0/9l
TKDA Report - Hills of Bunker Lake Ponds
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT
AGENDA.
THANK YOU.
,
'J
_/
****************************************************************
~~************************************************************~*
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ .*
~~ **
~~ .*
:: WHAT'S HAPPENING? ::
~~ -~~-- ~ ----~ . . .. - (b ~~
~~ **
:~ **
~~ **
~ **
~~ **
~~ **
:: * Let it snow - let it snow -I it snow ::
~~ **
~~ **
~~ * Attached is idea for the Council to consider **
:: on a method of financing streets that are ::
~~ hard to assess. **
~~ **
~~ fl.". r- **
~ Th . t . f'\""'"' IN '7 *
~: e Cl les around the metro area discuss the :*
~~ attached "Local Transportation utility" **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ .*
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
:~ **
~~ **
~ ~
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ .*
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ .*
~~ .*
~~ **
~~ **
~~ ~
~~ **
~~ **
~~ ~
~~ **
~~ t **
~~l **
~~ I **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~ ~
~ ~
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~**************************************************************
................................................................
Of?
S~
"
t'
AUTIIORIlY FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION UTILITY
:.J
THE PROBLEM LACK OF ADEQUATE FINA1'lCING FOR LOCAL
TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES
· With limited property tax revenues and state aidt many Minnesota cities have not
~n able to keep up with the replacement and repair needs of their
transportation infrastructure. In spite of the changes made during the 1991
Legislative Session and the creation of the local government trust fund, the
outlook for increased funding for local transportation facilities does not look
optimistic.
* The cumulative effect of several years of state cuts has severely limited cities'
abilities to plan for and administer long-range improvements to their local streets
and roads. Cities need a dedicatedt stable, long.term revenue source for this
purpose. Aid to cities was cut $16 million by the 1990 Legislature. During
calendar year 1991, in two separate cuts in state aid to local governments, cities
lost $38 million. Cities were not able to levy property taxes to make up for either
of these aid cuts.
These mid-year aid cuts have serious negative affects on long-range spending by
cities, particularly for infrastructure projects. Funding is not available to meet the
needs of many cities. In order to meet current year service requirements, longer-
term costs for streets and roads are frequently delayed. In the long-term, such
delays and neglect of necessary maintenance and reconstruction result in
substantially higher project costs.
Cities were not able to levy property taxes to make up for either of these aid cuts.
Revenue shortfalls are resulting in delay and neglect of many city transportation
systems throughout the state.
(For calendar year 1992, cities wiUlose $42 million in state aid -. cities will be
carefully weighing whether to raise property taxes to make up for this cut, or to
cut services by this amount, or a combination. Therefore, cities are unlikely to
have substantial amounts of additional revenue to address transportation needs.)
Although 2 cents of sales tax receipts are now being targeted to the local
government trust fund, distribution of the growth of these revenues is very
uncertain. Because of tight levy limits and aid CLltS, transportation infrastructure is
being neglected. Waiting to see whether the trust fund does indeed produce the
.~
1
.:O'.j ~Oi,~l' Ot'.] 1,~: 1=1 T
~ ': r::- PC!
'~j ':>:. \:i - T ~ .C' - ~ : '~f : -::: 1.
,,:. ~ T . - -I
r ~ >i ~ I-I :3 ('j :J ti :: ~
. '\
\.J
revenues necessary to catch up on this infrastructure spending would not be
prudent management of our transportation system.
· The ability to use special assessments is limited. As an infrastructure financing
tool, special assessments mean large yearly burdens on individual property owners.
Assessments of several thousand dollars are common for major reconstruction
projects. The burden falls only on the properties which directly abut the project,
in spite of the value of the improvement to the community as a whole.
In many cities, however, special assessments can only be used to finance a small
ponion of the costs of transportation facility replacement, reconstruction, and
maintenance. The Minnesota Supreme Court has ruled that "proof of benefit"
must be proven when using special assessments. That means that the city may
assess only an anlount that is equal to the increase in the value of the property
which is due to the improvement. Unlike many other states (including Wisconsin),
Minnesota cities have very limited latitude to use special assessments for many
capital projects. In Wi.~consin, the burden is generally on the party objecting to
the special assessment to show that a special assessment is unreasonable.
Special assessment restrictions do not allow cities to recover the full costs
associated with a project from the adjacent property owner. This means that
either general property tax revenues or special property tm: levies for bonded debt
must be made to cover these costs.
According to information from the Office of the State Auditor:
-- over the period of 1981 - 1989, special assessments by cities grew by only $19
million (S 164 million to $183 million); an annual average growth rate of only 1.4
percent, and
-- special assessments as a percent of total city revenue have been shrinking -- in
1981, they represented 12.1 percent of total city revenues, by 1989, they accounted
for only 8.2 percent.
By comparison, not including recent aid cuts in 1990 and 1991, property taxes grew
at an average rate of 11.1 percent over this time period; fines and forfeits at a rate
of 8.5 percent.
* Problems In financing the reconstruction and repair of transportation systems is
common in both new and old cities; large and smalf cities; metropolitan and
Greater Minnesota cities; urban, suburban, and regional centers. Any city which
has experienced aid cuts, Is limited in their use of special assessments, or is
hesitant to Incur large amounts of debt needs a new financing tool In order to
protect their transportation Infrastructure.
~
2
'~(I'.:J LOO'OI'1 Z,::::I:lf
r-: 1Z +J[I
(~i::': :-lZ::--,,1':': l3.:.
33I1IJ NW ~O 3n~~3-
:,)
"
.J
. Streets do have a nnlte "life: depending on adequate and tImely maintenance,
. weather conditions, traffic, etc. The longer the neglect, delay of adequate revenues
necessary to repair and maintain, the earlier the entire strect will need to be
replaced, with higher costs incurred by the city taxpayers. With the exception of a
few newly developing suburbs, cities in MInnesota have mnny streets which are 50
years old or older.
. Local transportation systems receive limited funding. Cities under 5,000 receive
no direct state funding for their streets. Cities over 5,000 receive Municipal State
Aid for a maximum of 20 percent of the streets within their boundaries.
,.. The economy of the state is dependent on the timely and adequate repair and
replacement of roads and streets in Minnesota cltles. Nearly 16,000 miles of this
system is made up of city streets. TIle ability to operate a transportation utility
would help each city adequately do their part to preserve our vital transportation
network.
,.. Minnesota's economy is dependent upon an efficient and well-maintained system
of roads and streets. Lack of adequate local funding endangers the functioning of
the state's total transportation network.
3
::- IJ '.j ~ ~-~l 0 . (;~; ';.,~: I) T
-;:':. lC ~ J[J
9860-!~~-~t9:l31
53111J NW jn 3nS7~~
~)
,
,~
TIlE SOq.mON A TRANSPORTATION UTILl1Y
· Revenues from a transportation utilIty would provide dedicated, stable, long-term
funding for necessary transportation infrastructure.
· Transportation faclllties benefit.a!! residents and property owners, homeowners
and businesses.
· The transportation utll1ty would result In long-run cost savings. They will be able
to address reconstruction and repair needs through a gradual, timely process.
Citie:s will be able to accumulate funds gradually, and to pay for large capital costs
as they arise from this dedicated account.
· The utility would provide a more appropriate and more acceptable financing
method for transportation infrastructure projects than the use of large specIal
assessments on a limited number of property owners. A transportation utility fee,
collected gradually and expended in a timely manner, would reduce the impact of
the special assessment 011 individual property owners. The transportation utility
would be able to spread the co:sts of repairing and replacing the city's street system
over time and over all property thereby minimizing each property's contribution.
* Because of the make-up of Minnesota's economy, the state is dependent upon an
efficient and well. maintained system of roads and streets. If they are given the
authority to operate transportation utilities, Minnesota cities will be able to
responsibly repair and replace their street systems.
· The costs and uses of transportation services do not have a close relationship to
property values. Transportation facilities flnanced by "user fees" would more
accurately reflect appropriate burden than the impact of property taxes. Use of
traffic generation data would not be influenced by property values (tax capacity).
Therefore, the transportation utility is a user fee, not a property tax.
* Legislation authorizing the utility will be enabling only; city councils will each
need to individually authorized and implement this tool according to their
transportation needs, available revenue, and local choice.
* A transportation utility would reduce the need for bonded debt. The need for
additional tax levies to pay the costs of bonding for transportation facilities would
be suhstantially reduced. Cities would be able to collect the fees and quickly
expend them for necessary projects rather than assembling larger, more costly
plans and incur the additional costs of issuing debt.
4
'; I.] '.~ ~ 1:1 i:: . (I I'J ~ '-: : I~; ~
~ i:, T - ::. ::ri
'~:: i: : - T ': '::-::- T ':' : -:: l.
':.:: I 1. I:I . ,,', .:Ci 31~I:if:i3-
· The storm sewer and sanitary sewer utilities have already set the precedent for
such authority. A transportation utility would operate under authority comparable
.' ) to the current statute authorizing cities to operate storm water and sanitary
'- sewerage utilities (Minnesota Statute Chapter 444). These set the precedent for
charging for a service without proving equal increased property benefit and
without metering.
The authorization was based on the idea that everyone benefits from a well-
functioning storm sewer system; there is no rational basis for the property owner
on the top of the hill not sharing in the community's costs of controlling the water
which flows by their property. This process demonstrated that a technical, well-
founded measurement, without a meter, can be developed to equitably share the
costs of infrastructure reconstruction and repair. Gradually, more and more cities
are using the storm sewer utility as the most appropriate tool to fund operations
and reconstruction.
As with the fees for the storm sewer and sanitary Sewer utilities, the transportation
utility fee could be efficiently administered by listing the charge on the monthly or
quarterly utility bills issued by the city for other utilities which it provides.
· The calculation of the transportation utility fee would be justifiable and equitable.
The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) produces extensive studies and
reference materials concerning estimated traffic trips, "trip-generation," by type of
property. Relative use of city streets would be measured by the number of
vehicular trips generated by a property. This provides a means of allocating COSts
proportionally on the basis of how extensively properties contribute to the use of
the improved or expanded roadway. This is an appropriate method for Minnesota
cities to use when administering a transportation utility.
Trip-generation information is currently used to determine necessary street widths,
traffic signal needs, road access requirements, and to design parking facilities. The
traffic trip generation method has been accepted nationally as a valid technique to
estimate traffic from existing and proposed developments. Traffic can be
measured both mechanically (traffic counters) and manually (visual inspections).
Local studies of actual traffic counts are the source for these statistics. Cities
would be able to use this information when determining fee rates on different
types of property within their boundaries.
Trip-generation calculations would logically be used to address concerns about the
fact that many properties may benefit from transportation system projects that do
not directly front on the foad being improved. Where special assessments are
used, many other properties in the city, and many other taxpayers, benefit from
these improvements without participating in dlrect costs.
'\
\J
5
90'd lOO'ON r::OT
l~~, ["j +]IJ
9860-:~~-~:'~:-~1
S3IIIJ NW ~o 3n~~3l
(J
'" The level of the utility fee would be based on the long-term needs of the city's
transportation system and the plans for replacement and repair. Revenue
generated by this utIlIty would not be spent for general fund purposes, they would
be dedicated in a separate budget account to the reconstruction and repair of city
streets and roads.
'" The transportation utility could be Implemented efficiently and faIrly. Legislation
authorizing the utility will be enabling only; city councils will each need
individually have to chose and authorize to implement this tool according to their
transportation needs, revenues available to the city, and local choice of financing
methods. The utility would be adopted by ordinance or resolution by the city
council after public hearings to receive citizen input.
As with other decisions made by city councils, citizens have the right to appeal the
utility fee for reconsideration. If the citizen wished, the issue may ultimately be
appealed to the district court.
In addition, use of the transportation utility can be reversed through a vote of the
people (reverse referendum).
'" Beeause of the finite life of city streets, many eities have .pavement management
programs' which plan a system of rl)gular sealcoating and overlay to extend the
overall life of the roadway system. The opportunity for a city to fund these needs
on an ongoing basis ~ith a transportntlon utility would facllltate responsible
transportation planning.
'" Authority for the transportation utility was endorsed by the Transportation Study
Board and Included in their bill during the 1991 Legislative Session.
"-
,~
6
~c,'.:~ ~CII:I'i::i',l ';:~:I)!:
T r:. l '. + :11]
'"': .:' ':1- 1 Z ,::; - ,::; 'i ". : l31.
':; 3 I 1. I~! i' .Il-,]
.::1] -., _.. --
DRAFT
,-J
AUTHORITY FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION UTILITY
Introduction
with limited property tax revenues and state aid, many Minnesota
cities have not been able to keep up with the replacement and
repair needs of their transportation infrastructure. In spite of
the changes made during the 1991 Legislative Session and the
creation of the local government trust fund, the outlook for
increased funding for transportation facilities does not look
optimistic.
Several years of state cuts have severely limited cities'
abilities to plan for and administer long-range improvements to
their local streets and roads. cities need a dedicated, stable,
long-term revenue source for this purpose.
Minnesota I S economy is dependent upon an efficient and well-
maintained system of roads and streets. If they are given the
authority to operate transportation utilities, Minnesota cities
will be able to responsibly repair and replace their street
systems.
considerations and advantages of a transportation utility:
* Revenues from a transportation utility would provide dedicated,
stable, long-term funding for necessary transportation
infrastructure.
* Transportation facilities benefit all residents and property
owners, homeowners and businesses.
* There are nearly 16,000 miles of city streets in the state.
The economy of the state is dependent on the timely and adequate
repair and replacement of roads and streets in Minnesota cities.
* During the last two years, aid to cities was cut $54 million
during the 1990 and 1991 Legislative Sessions. cities were not
able to levy property taxes to make up for either of these aid
cuts. Revenue shortfalls are resulting in delay and neglect of
many city transportation systems throughout the state.
* The costs and uses of transportation services do not have a
close relationship to property values. Transportation facilities
financed by "user fees" would more accurately reflect appropriate
, burden than property taxes.
--.J
,)
* Relative use of city streets can be measured by the number of
vehicular trips which are generated by a property. Use of trip-
generation data would provide a means of allocating costs
proportionally based on how extensively properties contribute to
the use of the improved or expanded roadway.
* Use of traffic generation data would not be influenced by
property values (tax capacity). Therefore, the transportation
utility is a user fee, not a property tax.
* The level of the utility fee would be based on the long-term
needs of the ci ty I S transportation system and the plans for
replacement and repair. Revenue generated by this utility would
not be spent for general fund purposes, they would be dedicated
in a separate budget account to the reconstruction and repair of
city streets and roads.
* with the exception of a few newly developing suburbs, cities in
Minnesota have many streets which are 50 years old or older.
streets do have a finite "life (between 30 and 50 years)
depending on adequate and timely maintenance, weather conditions,
traffic, etc. The longer the neglect, the delay of adequate
revenues necessary to repair and maintain, the earlier the entire
street will need to be replaced, with higher costs incurred by
the city taxpayers.
* Problems in financing the reconstruction and repair of
transportation systems is common in both new and old cities;
large and small cities; metropolitan or Greater Minnesota cities;
urban, suburban, and regional centers. Any city which has
experienced aid cuts, is limited in their use of special
assessments, is hesitant to incur large amounts of debt, and ....
needs the opportunity to improve their infrastructure through the
use of a transportation utility.
* Authority for the transportation utility was endorsed by the
Transportation study Board and included in their bill during the
1991 Legislative session.
* Legislation authorizing the utility will be enabling only; city
councils will each need to individually authorized and implement
this tool according to their transportation needs, available
revenue, and local choice.
'\
.J
2
Use of special assessments is limited
\)
As an infrastructure financing tool, special assessments mean
large one-year burdens on individual property owners.
Assessments of several thousand dollars are not unusual for a
major reconstruction project. This burden falls only, on the
property, which directly abuts the project, in spite of the value
of the improvement to the community as a whole. A transportation
utility fee, collected gradually and expended in a timely manner,
would reduce the impact of the one-time special assessment on
individual property owners. The transportation utility would be
able to spread the costs of repairing and replacing the city's
street system over time and over all property.
In many cities, however, special assessments can only be used to
finance a small portion of the costs of transportation facility
replacement, reconstruction, and maintenance. The Minnesota
Supreme Court has ruled that "proof of benefit" must be proven
when using special assessments. That means that the city may
assess only an amount that is equal to the increase in the value
of the property which is due to the improvement. Unlike many
other states (including Wisconsin), Minnesota cities have very
limited latitude to use special assessments for many capital
projects. In wisconsin, the burden is generally on the party
objecting to the special assessment to show that it is
unreasonable in order to prevent the assessment.
special assessment restrictions do not allow cities to recover
the full costs associated with a project from the adjacent
property owner. This means that either general property tax
revenues or special property tax levies for bonded debt must be
made to cover these costs.
According to information from the Office of the State Auditor:
__ over the period of 1981 - 1989, special assessments by cities
grew by only $19 million ($164 million to $183 million); an
annual average growth rate of only 1.4 percent, and
__ special assessments as a percent of total city revenue have
been shrinking -- in 1981, they represented 12.1 percent of total
city revenues, by 1989, they accounted for only 8.2 percent.
By comparison, not including recent aid cuts in 1990 and 1991,
state grants to cities grew at an average rate of 6.9 percent;
property taxes grew at an average rate of 11.1 percent over this
time period; fines and forfeits at a rate of 8.5 percent.
. "
,_/
3
. "'
'-J
A transportation utility would reduce the need for bonded debt
The need for additional tax levies to pay the costs of bonding
for transportation facilities would be sUbstantially reduced.
cities would be able to collect the fees and quickly expend them
for necessary projects rather than assembling larger, more costly
plans and incur the additional costs of issuing debt.
----------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
state aid cuts have taken a toll on revenues available for
transportation infrastructure
Aid to cities was cut $16 million by the 1990 Legislature.
During calendar year 1991, in two separate cuts in state aid to
local governments, cities lost $38 million. cities were not able
to levy property taxes to make up for either of these aid cuts.
These mid-year aid cuts have serious negative affects on long-
range spending by cities, particularly for infrastructure
projects. Funding is not available to meet the needs of many
cities. In order to meet current year service requirements,
longer-term costs for streets and roads are frequently delayed.
In the long-term, such delays and neglect of necessary
reconstruction result in substantially higher project costs.)
(For calendar year 1992, cities will lose $42 million in state
aid __ cities have the option to raise property taxes to make up
for this cut, or to cut services by this amount, or a
combination. )
Although 2 cents of sales tax receipts are now being targeted to
the local government trust fund, distribution of the growth of
these revenues is very uncertain. Because of tight levy limits
and aid cuts, transportation infrastructure is being neglected.
Waiting to see whether the trust fund does indeed produce the
revenues necessary to catch up on this infrastructure spending
would not be prudent management of our transportation system.
=================================================================
The storm sewer and sanitary sewer utilities have already set the
precedent for such authority
.A transportation utility would operate under authority comparable
to the current statute authorizing cities to operate storm water
and sanitary sewerage utilities (Minnesota statute chapter 444) .
These set the precedent for charging for a service without
proving equal increased property benefit and without metering.
The authorization was based on the idea that everyone benefits
"' from a well-functioning storm sewer system; there is no rational
'-)
4
~J
basis for the property owner on the top of the hill not sharing
in the community's costs of controlling the water which flows by
their property. This process demonstrated that a technical,
well-founded measurement, without a meter, can be developed to
equitably share the costs of infrastructure reconstruction and
repair. (Gradually, more and more cities are using the storm
sewer utility as the most appropriate tool to fund operations and
reconstruction.)
As with the fees for the storm sewer and sanitary sewer
utilities, the t~ansportation utility fee could be efficiently
administered by listing the charge on the monthly or quarterly
utility bills issued by the city for other utilities which it
provides.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
calculating the transportation utility fee
The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) produces
extensive studies and reference materials concerning estimated
traffic trips, "trip-generation," by type of property. Relative
use of city streets would be measured by the number of vehicular
trips generated by a property. This provides a means of
allocating costs proportionally on the basis of how extensively
properties contribute to the use of the improved or expanded
roadway. This is an appropriate method for Minnesota cities to
use when administering a transportation utility.
Trip-generation information is used to ...
The traffic trip generation method has been accepted nationally
as a valid technique to estimate traffic from existing and
proposed developments. Traff ic can be measured both mechanically
(traffic counters) and manually (visual inspections).
Local studies of actual traffic counts are the source for these
statistics. cities would be able to use this information when
determining fee rates on different types of property within their
boundaries. (Somewhat standardized ratios of fees for types of
property are being developed and would be used initially by
cities using the transportation utility. cities would each still
have the opportunity to determine their fee structure according
to their local property and their needs.)
Trip-generation calculations would logically be used to address
concerns about the fact that many properties may benefit from
transportation system projects that do not directly front on the
road being improved. Where special assessments are used, many
other properties in the city, and many other taxpayers, benefit
from these improvements without participating in direct costs.
"-
, )
5
Implementation of the transportation utility
~)
Legislation authorizing the utility will be enabling only; city
councils will each need to individually authorized and implement
this tool according to their transportation needs, available
revenue, and local choice. The utility would be adopted by
ordinance or resolution by the city council after public hearings
to receive public input.
According to standard operation, citizens may appeal the utility
fee for reconsideration. Ultimately, the utility fee may be
appealed to the court.
In addition, use of the transportation utility can be reversed
through a vote of the people (reverse referendum).
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Issues of transportation system needs
Because of the finite life of city streets, many cities have
"pavement management programs" which plan a system of regular
sealcoating and overlay to extend the overall life of the roadway
system. The opportunity for a city to fund these needs on an
ongoing basis with a transportation utility would facilitate
responsible transportation planning.
cities under 5,000 receive no direct state funding targeted for
their streets. cities over 5,000 receive Municipal state Aid for
a maximum of 20 percent of the streets within their boundaries.
"
,
'_ji
6
,~
'\
,-.J
.d.GE~jQ.d.
TO ~e-
Ij/~/,-~U
. ---.-- --/-.-- 1-7--
LJECEIVED
j \1 GO 2 8 1991
,-
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS
CITY OF ANDOVER
<>::-:::t:9: 23. 1 '3~ !
7 . ':'1~1 .:1M
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. Approval of Agenda
3 .
(Inon M.;l"o
.... ,.... '-'" " I ,~'-'
onl Tr-V TTi::MC::
. .............-. ...,...,......
.1. Appr-~v.~: c~ ~i~U:'9~
5.
Ocrnno C'n~n~,nn ~~r~-o~'1
,'..... .......... '..... , " '....... ,.... "'::l .... -' .-.....- :l J
:s:;s.
'J~~,~c n; nQ~~'n~ ~n ~~o ~n1~~\"'n~ nrn~Qr~~'
I......... '.......... ..... .._....., ":I ...., -....... '...... '....... "'::::l ,.... -'..;""'.....\.;......
Pro.]. 91-06:S=~;d !:ree~',: ~:7t~ ,j.,'o/9.
C~_, Q0_~' .rr~~ r~~c~. '-~~n C~n'~C ~ln T~ =n~~r
. I.......,;. ..._ '.,1, ._........... .....' ...._". _.........., "...............- ......'.... .......... -;j,_....
Proj. 92-02:C=cn Creek: ':SAH 242 ~o S Coon Cl~ Dr.
Pr~J. 92-03:CeCar CreeK: ~o~fluence ~o RM .3
0\1""1""'\;
. , ......;.
92-04:Cccn Creek:
::; 1 n_C,=,r"I ~_ =r,.....o.+'
",,.., ,.'-.... .........., -::I' -....
Proj. 92-05:Sand CreeK: R1p-rap: Olive St.
0,........., O"'_'l~.c.'=ln.-I ,-',...oc.v' '=i'I"""I_r'".::H.... c:......~:::nl 01,-1
"....v. -.... .........,._'-,...... .....' -....,.. ., ',.., '-r-''' ,.... ,'-'./ '-'......
Proj. 92-07:Crccked Lal~e Milfcil
PERMIT ITEMS
DISCUSSION ITEMS
7. Intra Policy en Q1tch =aseme~~s
8. Discussion en Administrat1ve Permits
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
NEW BUSINESS
ADJOURN
, '\
,.-J
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS' MEETING
October 14, 1991
The Board of Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed District held
their regular meeting on October 14, 1991 at the Bunker Hills
Activities Center.
Present: Reggie Hemmes, Eldon Hentges, LuEllen Richmond, Paul
Williams, Bob Boyum.
Staff :
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:32 PM
Tim Kelly, Ed Mathiesen, Michelle Ulrich
2. Approval of the Agenda: Moved by Richmond, seconded by
Williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
3. Open Mike: No one was present
Pol icy Items.
4. Approval of September 23, 1991 Minutes: Moved by Williams,
seconded by Richmond. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum,
Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
5. Receive Monthly Financial Reports: Moved by Williams,
seconded by Richmond. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum,
Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
6. Approve Bills: Moved by Hentges, seconded by Williams.
Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond,
and Williams) and no nays. The bills to be paid are as follows:
Check
3389
3390
3391
3392
3393
3394
3395
3396
3397
3398
3399
3400
3401
3402
3403
3404
3405
3406
3407
3408
3409
3410
TO
Amount
6,033.11
3,216.52
2,703.50
2,482.00
1,500.00
902.95
631.39
514.92
365.46
360.40
359.40
300.00
300.00
175.00
155.25
115.25
62.01
33.88
19.50
17.08
10.22
6.86
.'\ncka County
JMM
H. Sheff
Lake Restoration
Midwest Land Surveyors
Blaine Office Part
COP
P Wi 11 i ams
Rick Johnson
R Hemmes'
L Richmond
B Boyum
E Hentges
Anoka Chamber of Commerce
ECH Publishers
Tim Kelly
US West
Kinko's
ICHA
OfficeHax
SPBS
ATT
7. Legislative Issues: The Board discussed the various
resolutions prepared by staff. Richmond raised the concern about
the Metropolitan Council's proposal for a fifth Hetropo1itan
system addressing ground water. Richmond moved that the Board
resolve to discourage the legislature from approving such a
reQuest. Boyum seconded. Hentges raised a concern about the
recommendation to raise the permit application fee suggesting it
'\
'--~
Page 2. Ceen CreeK Watershed District - October 14, 1991
~)
could be a disincentive to come in for a permit. Hentges
sU9gested a two tier system for permitting. Williams and Boyum
agreed suggesting a fee schedule be made available to the
publ ic.
Richmond moved all of the resolutions except the one on
increasing permit application fees and including one opposing the
creation of a fifth metropolitan system on ground water.
Seconded by Williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum,
Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays. The
resolutions approved were as follows:
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
RESOLUTION 91-12
REMOVAL OF LEVY LIMITS
AFFECTING METROPOLITAN WATERSHED DISTRICTS
WHEREAS,
the Coon
and,
Minnesota Statute 103B and 103D directs and authorizes
Creek Watershed District manage water comprehensively:
WHEREAS, The Coon Creek Watershed District has an approved
comprehensive plan that guides the programs, maintenance and
capital investments of the District; and
WHEREAS, The Coon CreeK Watershed District has been discouraged
from funding maintenance and capital improvements through the
_., . ..f r '''''''.' :1nd
So i 1 R~:.!~ur\,"'s, AnC'1ka Count.)' ~n..! U~f.' ~!''1..', :pal it;es within the
District; and,
WHEREAS, ,."" \". ~:,,, '0'," 'Jr3inage gradients, prevalenoe of water
,,"f,;., the District, and the degree of urban development,
maintenance of the conveyance system and construction of capital
facilities is necessary to protect the health, safety and welfare
of the citizens of the District; and,
WHEREAS, Ad valorem financing is the only option remaining, and
has been restricted by levy limits,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Coon Creek Watershed
District Board of Managers encourages the legislature to remove
the levy limits affecting the implementation of metropolitan
water management plans.
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
RESOLUTION 91-13
INCREASING THE ADMINISTRATIVE LEVY AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 103B and 103D direct the District to
manage water and related land resources in a comprehensive and
provident manner; and,
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 103D.905 authorizes the District to
levy 0.D241B percent of the taxable market value, or $125,000,
which ever is less, for general administrative expenses and for
construction and maintenance of projects of common benefit to the
District; and,
"
\...J
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 103B, 103D, 103G.220, and the 1991
Minnesota Water Plan emphasize the prevention of water problems
and the potential loss of wetlands through land use regulation
and permitting; and,
Page 3. Coon Creek Watershed District - October 14, 1991
~J
WHEREAS,
oriented;
Regulatory and permitting programs are administrative
and,
WHEREAS, The Minnesota Environmental Quality Board, through the
1991 Minnesota Water Plan, encourages the state to make local
water plans a highly visible element of the coordination strategy
for water management, including the commitment of money and
authority necessary to achieve goals; and,
WHEREAS, An administrative levy of $125,000 is insufficient to
cover the administrative costs of the increasingly complex and
involved regulatory and general administrative requirements.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Coon Creek Watershed
District Board of Managers encourages the Minnesota State
Legislature to remove the levy cap of $125,000.
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
RESOLUTION 91-14
RELATING BENEFITS AND REVENUES
TO THE RUNOFF FROM PROPERTY
WHEREAS, Watersheds are special taxing Districts authorized by
Minnesota Statute 103D; and,
WHEREAS, The purpose of Watershed are to conserve natural
resources using sound scientific principles; and,
WHEREAS, Water is the natural resource most at issue in
developing and financing capital improvement or maintenance
projects; and,
WHEREAS, The special assessment of benefited properties has
historically been the financing tool encouraged by legislation;
and,
WHEREAS, Proving benefit through an increase in the market value
of properties affected by projects is increasingly difficult as
project benefits become more indirect and long term; and,
WHEREAS, The conveyance of water from property has more to do
with the land use and size of the property than its market value;
and,
WHEREAS, The amount of water that needs to be conveyed away from
a property to prevent flooding or ensure that the property is
tillable can be determined usin9 sound scientific principles;
and,
WHEREAS, A philosophy of payment for services or, user fees has
been encouraged over use of general property taxes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That determination of benefits
based on runoff coefficient from a property is a more equitable
way of determining the benefit of conveying water, whether it is
for agricultural drainage or urban storm water.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, The legislature is encouraged to
incorporate this concept into legislation addressing the
financing of water quantity and quality programs at the local
level.
~ )
Page 4. Coon Crgek Watershed Dlstrict - October 14. 1991
~)
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
RESOLUTION 91-15
WATER PLANS FOR STATE AND REGIONAL FACILITIES
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 103B, and 103D encourage and require
counties, cities, watershed districts, and watershed management
organizations to prepare comprehensive plans for managing water
and related land resources within their jurisdiction; and,
WHEREAS, Within the boundaries of these units of government
there may be state and regional facilities and lands; and,
WHEREAS, These facilities and lands are part of the hydrology of
the government unit; and,
WHEREAS, For ccmprehensive management to be effective the
managing agency needs either control or assurance that water
management is being conducted in a prudent and provident manner;
and.
WHEREAS, The State of Minnesota in the 1991 Minnesota Water Plan
is seeking to refine a coordination strategy for water
management, and wishes to make local water plans a highly visible
element in that coordination.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, The Minnesota state
legislature require water planning for all state lands classified
under Under Minnesota Statute 80A regional facilities classified
under Minnesota Statute 473.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, That these plans be coordinated
with either the county plans or the watershed plans.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, The legislature address the issue
of local recovery of proportionate costs of capital improvements
associated with the management of water emanating from state and
regional facilities.
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
RESOLUTION 91-16
RECOVERY OF PERMIT ENFORCEMENT COSTS AND
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF PERMIT DECISIONS
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 103B, and 103D require watershed
districts, to prepare comprehensive plans and rules for managing
water and related land resources within their jurisdiction; and,
WHEREAS, The authority of watershed district managers to enforce
the rules of the district pertaining to floodplains, greenbelts,
and open space areas is limited in areas where county or
municipal ordinances regulating those areas exist; and,
WHEREAS, The Supreme Court has ruled that permit decisions by a
watershed district can be appealed to district court without
administrative review by the state Board of Water and Soil
Resources causing additional legal expenses for watershed
districts; and
~-)
WHEREAS, The penalty for violating a rule, order, stipulation
agreement or permit issued by the managers of a watershed
district is a misdemeanor; and,
WHEREAS, The maximum fine for a misdemeanor is not sufficient to
deter some violations; and,
Page 5. Coon Creek Watershed District - October 14, 1991
~)
WHEREAS, The legislature has considered legislation that
provides for watershed district rules taking precedence over
municipal or county ordinances; provide the administrative review
of permit decisions prior to an appeal to district court; and
authorize watershed district managers to assess a violator a
civil fine up to a maximum of $25,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, The Coon Creek Watershed
District Board of Managers support legislation expanding the
authority of watershed districts to assess the costs of remedial
work, allowing recovery of engineering and legal fees for
watershed districts in civil enforcement and providing for
administrative penalties of violation, and provide for
administrative review of permit decisions.
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
RESOLUTION 91-17
OPPOSING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
REGIONAL SYSTEM ON GROUND WATER
WHEREAS, The Metropolitan Council is charged with coordinating
regional affairs and the metropolitan systems of parks,
transportation, airports and sewers; and,
WHEREAS, The 1989 legislature directed the Metropolitan Council
to prepare a long-term water supply plan for the region; and,
WHEREAS, Part of the effort in preparing the long-term supply
plan included eight reports which serve as teChnical background
for the long-term water supply plan; and,
WHEREAS, A recommendation of those reports is an amendment to
Minnesota Statutes chapter 473 authorizing the Metropolitan
Council to include water supply as a fifth re9ional system; and
WHEREAS, The need for such a change in the institutional
framework of water management in the region is not suppor:ed in
the Council's eight technical papers; and,
WHEREAS, The majority of counties and watershed management
organizations within the region have recognized and initiating
programming to address the issue of the impacts of drought,
pollution and development on the quantity and quality of water
supplies within the region.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, The Coon Creek Watershed
District Board of Managers does not support the Metropolitan
Council's proposal to establish a fifth metropolitan system on
ground water.
The Board then reviewed resolutions from other watershed
District's in the metropolitan area that had been forwarded to
the District through the Minnesota Watershed District Association
resolution process.
(J
Hentges moved, seconded by Williams to support the resolution of
the Ramsey-WaShington Metro Watershed District to have the
Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts (MAWD) coordinate
lobbying efforts with the league of Minnesota Cities and the
Association of Minnesota Counties, to actively seek the
reinstatement of the levy exemption for counties funding WMO
capital improvement programs, as originally provided in the
Metropolitan Water Management Act. Motion carried with five yeas
(Boyum. Hemmes. Hentges. Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
,
I
I
~~
Page 6. Coon C~eek Wate~shed Dist~ict - Octobe~ 14, 1991
Hemmes moved, seconded by Boyum to support the resolution of the
Lower Minnesota Watershed District to request funds from the
State to cost share river bank protection on major river
channels. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Hemmes moved, seconded by Richmond to support the efforts of the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to seek increased enforcement
powers and options and clarify their current jurisdiction and
status in appeals. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes,
Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Permit Issues
8. Rock-A-Bi11ye's Bar (PAN 91-49): Mathiesen and Kelly
presented the permit application noting that the site's drainage
will use the road side ditch of TH 65. Staff recommended
approval of the application pending written notification from
MN/DOT that the TH 65 ditch is capable of handling this point
runoff and receipt of an erosion control escrow of $466.
Richmond and Williams raised a concern about the routing of the
runoff from the parking lot to the ditch and questioned the
e~istence of a culvert. Williams moved to table the application
to October 28 to allow staff to clarify the situation. Seconded
by Boyum. Moticn carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Discussion Items
9. Intro Policy on Floodplain Management: Kelly introduced the
draft policy noting that the policy addresses the issue of
allowable fill in the flood fringe by looking at the channel
slope of the ditch where the fill is proposed. Mathiesen stated
that the issue is that because of the lack of channel slopes in
much of the District fill in the fringe areas either would not be
allowed or compensatory storage would be required. Staff
recommended forwarding the policy to the advisory committees.
Moved by Richmond. Seconded by Boyum. Motion carried with five
yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no
nays.
10. DitCh 41 Inspection: Kelly reviewed the inspection report
noting the following: A general survey of the system was
conducted on September 24, October 4 and October 9, 1991. The
majority of the ditch system was found to be in the same
condition as the 1989 inspection. Motion carried with five yeas
(Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
E~ceptions included two areas between Olive St. and Foley St. in
Coon Rapids where significant bank erosion and bank sloughing has
occurred, and a 1,300 foot reach of ditch 41 from approximately
117th ave to 1,000 feet up stream.
: \
,-)
Kelly also noted that ditch 41 surveyed by Midwest Land Surveyors
on September 20, 23 to 25. A profile was provided to the
District on October 4, 1991. Ed Mathiesen reviewed the profile,
compared it to the approved plans for ditch 41 and noted the
following conclusions. (1) Although the upstream invert at
Jefferson St. is .6 feet higher than design grade it has little
effect on dewatering and drainage of the lands east of TH 55 due
to the 3.1 foot drop from TH 65 to Jefferson St.: (2) The high
upstream invert at Jefferson has a small effect on the 100 year
flood elevations since Jefferson St. is overtopped; (3) Matching
culvert inverts provides for a lower channel bottom than the
aooroved desiqn qrade.
. )
'--
Page 7. Ceon Cree~, Watershed District - October 14, 1991
Pursuant to staff recommendations; Williams moved, seconded by
Boyum to accept the report by Kelly as finding that the 1989
inspection is a sound and true representation of the condition of
ditch 41. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes,
Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Richmond moved, seconded by Hemmes to initiate arrangements for
conducting two rip-rap projects on Sand Creek between Olive St.
and Foley St. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes,
Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Richmond moved, seconded by Williams to initiate arrangement to
clean the channel of ditch 41 from 300 feet down stream of 117th
Ave. to 1,000 feet upstream from 117th Ave. provided the
estimated cost is no more than $1,500, in which event the project
should be brought back to the Board. Motion carried with five
yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and williams) and no
nays.
Boyum moved, seconded by Richmond to seek establishment of a
$10,000 budget to clean this reach if needed every five years, to
annually remove obstructions from this portion of the creek that
are higher than 1.5 feet from the approved channel, and that
obstructions of less than 1.5 feet may be removed by permit to
the District's standards. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum,
Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
11. Quarterly Objectives: Kelly presented the quarterly
objectives stating that priorities were 1. Audit of 1991
Finances; 2. Hiring District Clerk; 3. proj 91-04; 4. Hearings on
ditch 41 & 57 and 59 projects; 5. Initiate projects on ditches 41
& 57. Richmond asked if arrangement could be made to have a
representative from the metropolitan council at the next meeting.
Hentges moved approval of the quarterly objectives. Seconded by
Williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and williams) and no nays.
12. Intro Draft Financing Strategy: Kelly presented the draft
strategy. Several Board members stated that they wished to give
the matter mere thought and asked that it be placed higher on the
agenda. Richmond moved to table the strategy until the next
meeting. Seconded by Boyum. Motion carried with five yeas
(Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Informational Items
13. Staff Report: Williams moved to accept the staff report.
Seconded by Richmond. Motion carried with five yeas (Hemmes,
Boyum, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
The meeting adjourned at 9:46 PM on a motion by Williams,
seconded by Boyum. Motion carried with five yeas (Hemmes,
Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Reginald A. Hemmes, Presldent
'\
.... )
"-
\J
'1
'- /
.'
AGENDA
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS
Oc~aber 14, 1991
7:30 PM
1. Call to Order
2.
/~,pprO'la 1 of
~.-, C1.r'''''l rl '='
...::J'-"'.........
3. Open Mike
POLICY ITEMS
4. Approval of Minutes
5. Receive Monthly Financial Statements
6.
7.
Approve Bills
I o"";c'~1'"';\Jo i':=C'Jloe
~'-'~'~''''''U'.'-' _'-''-'_'-''-'
PERMIT ITEMS
8.
Rock-A-9illye's Bar
( D 6 ~; q 1 _ A Q \
\' ,,,, ..., .......... J
DISCUSSION ITEMS
9. Intra Pelie,': Floodplain Management
10. Ditch 41 Inspection
11. Quarterly Objectives
12. Intra Draft Financial Framework
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
NEW BUSINESS
ADJOURN
--
/ ~~.
: '-"'
I'--~-'.o~'
'. .. ~ -
, ,l ." /..:..
, ' I.'
! ~ ,_ ;.: L~.
.~ .~
~Cc
11/:;j7/
"'~I'
"
,
, j
. "J! J
--.----"
;: ~"7~" .- .... :::..
~~"'-" I
--"'--"",-,"","."",-,-,~
~J
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS' MEETING
September 23, 1991
The Board of Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed District held
their re9ular meeting on September 23, 1991 at the Bunker Hills
Activities Center.
Present: Reggie Hemmes, Eldon Hentges, LuEllen Richmond, Paul
Williams, Bob Boyum.
Staff:
Tim Kelly, Ed Mathiesen, Harold Sheff
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:32 PM
2. Approval of the Agenda: Kelly asked to add one item
concerning rental of additional space. Richmond moved to approve
the agenda with the addition, seconded by Williams. Motion
carried with four yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Richmond, and Williams)
and no nays.
3. Open Mike: Bart Biernot of Anoka County Environmental
Services introduced himself to the Board. Mr. Biernot will be
working on ground water issues in the county.
Hentges arrived.
Policy Items
4. Approval of September 9, 1991 Minutes: Moved by Williams,
seconded by Richmond. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum,
Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
5. Revised Lease for Office Space: Kelly reported on space
availability in the Bank noting that the Bank is nearing full
occupancy. Kelly added that the 1992 budget proposes additional
office space. Kelly noted that the space that is available is
more than was budgeted for in 1992 and proposes to fund the
difference through the operations expenses contingency fund.
Kelly also noted that the lease was a fixed rate for three years
and would begin November 1, 1991 and require a deposit of
$341.33. Moved by Richmond, seconded by Williams to approve the
lease. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
6. Ditch 57 Inspection: Kelly presented the inspection report
noting that the Board needed to approve the report to access the
existing fund balance in the ditch 57 maintenance fund. Boyum
inquired about the livestock watering at Coon Creek Boulevard.
Kelly and Mathiesen noted that it presents a water Quality
concern. Richmond moved to approve the inspection report and
direct staff to contact the owner of the cattle. Seconded ~y
Hentges. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hen~ges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Permit Items
~)
7. Mager Wildlife Pond (PAN 91-47): Mathiesen presented the
permit application recommending that the applicant contact the
Corps of Engineers, the pond conform to the general design
considerations for wildlife pondS of the District, that no
grading be done within the ditch easement, and that any spoil be
placed a minimum of 50 feet from the center line of the ditch.
Hentges voiced concern about the distance between the ditch bank
and the pond bank and directed staff to ask the applicant if he
would move the pond further back from the ditch. An erosion
Page 2. Coon Creek Watershed District - September 23, 1991
~J
control escrow of $500 was recommended. Williams moved approval
of the application with the staff recommendations. Seconded by
Boyum. Motion carried with four yeas (Hemmes, Boyum, Richmond,
Hentges, and Williams) and no nays.
8. Andover Street Improvement and Drainage Swale (PAN 91-48)
Kelly presented the permit application recommending that the
city's contractor be required to obtain the District permit, the
proposed pond be a minimum of 4 feet deep, the city supply a
maintenance plan for the pond, and erosion control be placed
adjacent to the pond and adjacent to the wetland during
construction of the swale. An erosion control escrow of $1,701
was recommended. Boyum moved approval of the permit. Seconded
by williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes,
Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Discussion Items
9. Public Hearing on 1992 Budget: Chairman Hemmes convened the
hearing at 8:20 PM and asked that the record show that no one was
present. Richmond moved to close the hearing. Seconded by
Williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
The following resolution was moved by Richmond. Seconded by
Wi 11 iams.
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS
RESOLUTION 91-11
ADOPTING 1992 BUDGET
WHEREAS, The Coon Creek Watershed District is established
and authorized under Minnesota Statutes 103D; and
WHEREAS, The Coon Creek Watershed District has completed the
budget hearings required under Minnesota Statutes 103D.911; and
WHEREAS, It is requisite and necessary that the Board of
Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed District adopt a budget
for the year 1992.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following budget is
hereby adopted for the Coon Creek Watershed District for the
year 1992.
1992 BUDGET
REVENUES
Property Taxes
Special Assessments (Debt)
Licenses & Permits
Other
TOTAL
"
'- )
EXPENDITURES
Per Diem, Salaries & Benefits
Professional Services
Travel
Training
Operating Expenses
Program Costs
Capital Equipment
Debt Service
TOTAL
Amount
$312,972
71,260
150
54.852
$439,234
Amount
$ 80,511
66,512
2,997
773
32,495
184,136
550
71.260
$439,234
Page 3. Coon Creek Watershed District - September 23, 1991
/ \
\J
PROGRAMS
Administration
Development Regulation
Planning
Maintenance & CIP (incl. Debt)
Research & Data
Pub & Gov Relations
TOTAL
Amount
$ 85,208
57,833
10,055
239,045
42,047
5.046
$439,234
Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond,
and Williams) and no nays.
10. Intro Policy on Permit Coordination: Kelly introduced a
draft policy addressing coordination or permitting for water
management with municipal, county, state, and federal agencies.
Kelly recommended forwarding the Draft to the advisory
committees. Moved by Richmond. Seconded by Williams. Motion
carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and
Williams) and no nays.
11. Met Council Working Papers on Ground Water: Kelly reviewed
the 8 reports prepared by Met Council staff noting two issues.
The need for ground water planning in the county that builds on
the assessment being prepared and second the proposal for a fifth
metropolitan system for ground water to be coordinated by the
Metropolitan Council. Kelly noted that the 8 reports were very
well done however they do not support the recommendation for a
fifth system. Richmond asked staff to request the local met
council representative to come to a Board meeting and present and
discuss the ground water reports.
12. Ditch 41 Update: Kelly gave a brief update on the progress
of preparing a profile for a portion of Sand Creek and inspecting
the system.
Information Items
13. Letter to the City of Coon Rapids Storm Water Drainage
Problem: The Board discussed the letter to the city of Coon
Rapids from Mr. and Mrs. M. Ericson. Richmond moved to have
staff compose a letter to the city of Coon Rapids and Shamrock
development stating the requirement for preparation of grading
and drainage plans and referring to the problem. Seconded by
Williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes,
Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
The meeting adjourned at 9:07 PM on a motion by Hentges, seconded
by Williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Hemmes, Hentges,
Wi1liams, Richmond, and Boyum) and no nays.
Reginald A. Hemmes, President
"-
\
)
"
:~ TKDA
TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
October 24,1991
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUl., MINNESOTA55101.1803
6121202-4400
FAX 6121202-0083
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
Honorable Mayor and City Council
~dover,Mll1nesota
Re: Feasibility Report Update
Hidden Creek East 4th Addition
Project 91-25
~dover,~esota
Commission No. 10055
Dear Mayor and Council:
The above referenced project is the fourth phase of Hidden Creek East, as noted in the Feasibility
Report for Project 87-1, dated January 29, 1987. That report details all improvements and covers
project costs and details. This letter amends that report for the fourth addition.
Cost Estimate
The Fourth Addition proposes 15 residential lots. The cost estimate is as follows:
A. Sanitary Sewer
Item Unit
No. Description Ouantity Price Amount
1 Mobilization 1.0 LS $4,000.00 $ 4,000.00
2 Connect to Existing Sanitary Sewer Stub 1.0EA 300.00 300.00
3 8" PVC SDR 35 SS 10-12' 355.0 LF 18.00 6,390.00
4 8" PVC SDR 35 SS 12-14' 460.0 LF 20.00 9,200.00
5 8" PVC SDR 35 SS 14-16' 385.0 LF 22.00 8,470.00
6 Std. 4' Diameter Manhole 0-10' 5.0EA 1,200.00 6,000.00
7 Extra Depth Manhole> 10' 12.0 LF 80.00 960.00
8 4" x 8" PVC SDR 35 Wye 17.0 EA 45.00 765.00
9 4" PVC SDR 35 Service Pipe 600.0 LF 8.00 4,800.00
10 4" PVC SDR 35 Vertical Cleanout 17.0 EA 50.00 850.00
11 Televise Sanitary Sewer Lines 1.0 LS 500.00 500.00
Estimated Construction Cost - Sanitary Sewer $42,235.00
~)
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Andover, Minnesota
October 24, 1991
:,j Page Two
B. Watermain
Item Unit
No. Description Ouantity Price Amount
1 Connect to Existing 6" Watennain 1.0 EA $ 250.00 $ 250.00
2 6" DIP Class 50 Watermain 65.0 LF 15.00 975.00
3 8" DIP Class 50 Watermain 910.0 LF 14.00 12,740.00
4 6" MJ Gate Valve 4.0EA 400.00 1,600.00
5 8" MJ Gate Valve 2.0EA 500.00 1,000.00
6 6" MJ Hydrant 8'-6" Bury 3.0EA 1,200.00 3,600.00
7 MJ CIP Fitting 1,285.0 LB 1.50 1,927.50
8 I" Type K Copper Service 530.0 LF 8.00 4,240.00
9 I" Corporation Stop 17.0 EA 50.00 850.00
10 I" Curb Stop with Box 17.0 EA 85.00 1.445.00
Estimated Construction Cost - Watermain $28,627.50
C. Storm Sewer
Item Unit
No. Description Ouantity Price Amount
1 12" RCP Class 5 Storm Sewer 90.0 LF 19.00 1,710.00
2 15" RCP Class 5 Storm Sewer 24.0 LF 21.00 504.00
3 15" RC Flared End Section 1.0 EA 500.00 500.00
4 4' Diameter Catch Basin with Sump 3.0EA 1,000.00 3,000.00
5 Class II Rip Rap 4.0CY 75.00 300.00
6 Geotextile Fabric 6.0SY 6.00 36.00
Estimated Construction Cost - Storm Sewer $6,050.00
D. Streets and Restoration
Item Unit
No. Description Ouantity Price Amount
1 Common Excavation 250.0 CY 2.00 500.00
2 Common Borrow 250.0 CY 4.00 1,000.00
3 Sunnountable Concrete Curb & Gutter 1,800.0 LF 5.00 9,000.00
4 B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter 75.0 LF 6.00 450.00
5 Class 5 Gravel 850.0 TN 7.00 5,950.00
6 Bituminous Wear Course 2331 Type 41 400.0 TN 25.00 10,000.00
7 Subgrade Preparation 9.5RS 200.00 1,900.00
8 Roadside Seeding Mix No. 900 0.6AC 800.00 480.00
9 Topsoil Borrow 60.0 CY 8.00 480.00
~ 10 Sodding 1,000.0 SY 3.00 3,000.00
11 Open Ditching 220.0 LF 6.00 1.320.00
Estimated Construction Cost - Streets & Restoration $34,080.00
. '\
'J
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Puldover,MuUlesota
October 24,1991
Page Three
Total Estimated Cost
Estunated Project Expenses
Estimated Total Project Cost
Estimated Assessments
Estimated Project Assessment Rate, $144,292.50/15 Lots =
Sanitary Trunk Charge, $912/Acre x 6.5 Acres/IS Lots*
Water Trunk Charge, $972/Acre x 6.5 Acres/IS Lots*
Sanitary Sewer Connection Charge
Watermain Connection Charge
Total Estimated Assessments per Lot
$9,619.50
395.20
421.20
244.43
1.055.00
$11,735.33
* Trunk charges have been previously assessed under Project 87-3.
Sincerely yours,
~~
JLD:j
, )
$110,992.50
33.300.00
$144,292.50
I
.. ..
0
0
m
z
0
, :0
I m
m
^
m
)>
(f)
-i
N (;j
N
~ l!:
g tl :T
- r ~
r l> ~
0
- ~ z
.. '" ll:
Ii z
~ 11:
\
-j
"'U
o
z
o
z
(j)
:t>
:D
m
:t>
I
. ......~."/
o
"'U
m
z
o
-l
o
I
~"J"L IJII~ \ I
IIU
.
I
.
I
.
I
.
I
(;j
'"
0.
~
[T1
z
~
.
~
"-
,.J
~
CITY of ANDOVER
Regular City Council Meeting-November 5, 1991
7:30 P.M. Call to Order
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Discussion Items
l. Assessment Hearing-Delinquent Street Lights
2. Assessment Hearing-9l-l0/l59th, Swallow, Quinn
3. Assessment Hearing/88-30/Sewer & Water
4. Assessment Hearing/9l-l4/l68th Lane N.W.
5. Assessment Hearing/9l-l/Crosstown Drive
6. Kelsey Estates Final Plat, Cont.
7. Storm Drain Outlet to Ditch 37, Cont.
8. Comprehensive Plan Draft
9. Lot Split/l909 - l67th Avenue N.W.
10. Ordinance lO Amendment
ll. Ordinance 47 Amendment
l2. Ordinance 8, Section 7.0l Amendment
l3. Ordinance 8, Section 8.07 Amendment
staff, Committee, Commissions
l4. 1992 Capital Equipment/public works
l5. Water Hookup/Public Works Building
l6. Review Fire Bond Coordinator Contract
17. Hepatitis B Vaccine/Fire & Rescue
l8. Water problems/Discussion
19. Fire Bond Budget Changes
20. Kobs lst Addition Variance
Non-Discussion Items
2l. Accept Petition/Meadow Creek Estates
22. Receive Feasibility/9l-25/Hidden Creek E. 4th
23. Order Street Light/Bunker Lake Blvd. & Jay st.
24. Accept Streets/Kelsey Estates
25. Appoint Tree Commission Chair & Acting Chair
26. Order Ad for Bids/Congregate Dining Facility
27. Certify Delinquent utilities
28. Certify Cleanup Cost/2526-l38th Avenue N.W.
29. Adopt Resolution Establishing 1992 Fees
30. Accept Resignation/Bldg. Department Clerk
3l. Approve Purchase Agreement/Fire Station #3
32. Approve DNR Permit/Meadows of Round Lake
33. Approve Change Order/91-4
34. Approve Change Order #6/Fire Station
35. Approve Final Payment/Tankers 8 & 9
~)
Mayor/Council Input
Approval of Claims
Adjournment
'J
i;C,~"'f""'~~'~"'''>'''....
f -..."
,f '\
:j ~
'\ l
;1i,,/
"'k . ",'"
~'.____"!!I\''lfl
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
DATE
November 5, 1991
/
AGENDA ~ECTION 1 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPRov-:g:,R
NO. pprova of Minutes ::~j
Admin.
ITEM Approval of Minutes V. Volk \\-
NO.
BY:
/
The Ci ty Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
October l5, 1991 Regular Meeting
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY SECOND BY
TO
:J
i;'i,y\/"~i".."...n""".,,,\
., ~
" '."
~.i.."... ....'
1 :,'!
, ~
> ffJ
"'it" /f
I;;" .f
"'~~~,~~",,,,,,,,,,,'~i-;f;'i'!(!J;Ti""'-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
DATE
November 5, 1991
ITEM
NO.
I.
Assessment Hearing -
Delinquent street Light
BY:
Howard D. Koolick H)<-
Finance Director
OR
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
REQUEST
The Andover City Council has scheduled an assessment hearing for
7:30 p.m. regarding the certifying of delinquent street lights.
Upon completion of the public hearing, the City Council should
adopt the attached resolution adopting the assessment roll.
BACKGROUND
This is the first year that the City has attempted to certify
delinquent street light charges. A total of l46 notices were sent
totaling $7,l09.25. The proposed assessment roll covers all
unpaid street lighting charges from the beginning of street
light billing (approximately April of 1989) in the City through
the April 1991 billing.
Since the notice allowed prepayment without interest or
administrative charges through November 5th, the exact amount to
be certified will not be known until the night of the meeting.
Therefore, I will provide an assessment roll at the meeting.
As I pointed out in a memo to City Council on October lO,
Jerry Windschitl received 64 notices totaling $4,454.07.
these accounts go back into 1989. No other individual or
received more than 5 notices.
1991,
Many of
company
Attached you will find a resolution adopting the assessment roll.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
'- TO
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -9l
,]
MOTION by Councilmember
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR CERTIFICATION OF
DELINQUENT STREET LIGHTING CHARGES.
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by
law, the Council met and heard and passed upon all objections to
the proposed assessment for delinquent street lighting charges.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA:
l. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall
constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein,
and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be
benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in one annual
installment payable on or before the first Monday of January,
1992 and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per
year.
3. The owners, of any property so assessed may, at any time
prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor,
pay the whole of the assessment on such property with interest
accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that
no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid
within 30 days from the adoption of the resolution.
MOTION seconded by Councilmember
and adopted by the
City Council at a
regular
meeting this
5th
day of
November , 1992, with Councilmember
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmember
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
ATTEST:
(]
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
~":~::'''':''10,,,,
'J (C}\)
,~, "
'j~~~..'""':i.~""~;"'~""~'"
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
November 5, 1991
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
.;(.
Items
Admin.
Swallow,
James E. Schrantz
BY: BY:
The City Council scheduled an assessment hearing for 7:3~ P.M.
for Project 9l-l0 l59th Lane, Swallow Street and Quinn Street.
The improvement hearing was held on June l8, 1991 and the
estimated costs were $3,305.00 per unit.
The proposed assessment is $3,065.00 per unit at 8% interest for
lO years.
There are 40 lots with one lot to be assessed 2 units for a total
of 4l units.
Attach: Resolution
Notice
List of property owners
Map showing units
MOTION BY
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
\
'- ' TO
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
~J
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
STREET CONSTRUCTION
FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 9l-l0 FOR CERTIFICATION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to a proper notice duly given as required by law,
the council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the
proposed assessment for the improvement of street construction
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA.:
l. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of lO years, the first of the installments to
be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1992 and shall
bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum from the date of
the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment
should be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
resolution until December 3l, 1991. To each subsequent installment
when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid
installments.
3. The owners, of any property so assessed may, at any time prior
to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole
of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged
if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the
resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City
Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to December 3l of the year in which such payment is
made. Such payment must be made before November l5 or interest will be
charged through December 3l of the next succeeding year.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
meeting this
and adopted by
day of
the City Council at a
, 19
, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was
declared passed.
',)
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
r',
(
. '.
,..J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 9l-l0
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Andover,
Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, l685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of Andover, on November 5,
1991 at 7:30 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for the
improvement of street construction
in the following described area:
l59th Lane, Swallow Street and Quinn Street
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot,
or parcel of land is $3,065.00 You may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the entire
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment to the City Treasurer. No interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City
Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to December 3l of the year in which such payment is
made. Such payment must be made before October l5 or interest will
be charged through December 3l of the succeeding year. If you decide
not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the
assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of lO years and shall bear interest at the rate
of 8 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the
assessment is not available.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at
the City Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment
is $l25,63l Written or oral objections will be considered
at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount unless a
signed, written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the
hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The
Council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of
a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such
further notice to the affected property owne~s as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 429.08l by serving notice of the appeal
upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption
of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court
within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
',J
l5 3l.24 32 0042
G(~ald Kudak
2204 - l59th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
'1
,J
l5 32 24 32 OOOl
EM Maccario &
JE Kowalik
2246 - l6lst Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 32 0045
Wallace A Chipman
l6022 Swallow st
Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 32 004l
Dennis & Maryann
Anderson
l5952 Makah st NW
Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 32 0036
Glenn F & Darlene K
l5914 NW Swallow
Andover, MN 55304
Smith
l5 32 24 32 0040
Richard V Carlson
l592l NW Swallow
Andover, MN 55304
15 32 24 32 0037
Jerry W & VA Jorgenson
l5955 NW Swallow
Andover, MN 55304
.l5 32 24 3l 0023
Esther W Olson
. l5450 Nightingale NW
-j Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 3l 0022
Duane A & Jill M Fox
,"'14 - l59th Lane NW
-. Jover, MN 55304
15 32 24 3l 0015
David W & D Dickinson
l5988 Quinn 'st NW
Andover, MN 553~
\::.:9
/l5 32 24 32 0033
David L & MB Kirkeeide
l6039 NW Swallow
Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 32 0002
Dan E Warden
l6044 NW Swallow
Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 32 0030
Richard J & Karen J Nytes
l6008 NW Swallow
Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 32 0034
Arnold R & Joan Swenson
l5934 NW Swallow
Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 33 0002
Michael D & Sandra
l5859 Swallow St
Anoka, MN 55303
Fields
l5 32 24 32 0035
Gary D Wanous
l595l NW Swallow
Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 32 003l
Allen M & Linda C Luebke
l60l9 Swallow st NW
Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 3l 0025
Duane & Pamela Moschkau
2118 - l59th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
'l5 32 24 3l OOll
Robert J & Carole A Hall
7 Fenlea Circle
Dellwood, MN 55ll0.
l5 32 24 31 0012
Phillip H Johnson
l6048 Quinn st NW
Andover, MN 55304
r
l5 32 24 3l 0017
Mervin & Arlys Weinkauf
2l5l - l59th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 32 0044
Melvin G Simonson
l6032 Swallow st
Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 32 0032
Dennis & Maryann
Anderson
l5952' Makah st NW
Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 32 0038
Joseph & P Merchlewicz
l5920 Swallow NW
Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 32
Gerald R or
Route 3 Box
Osakis, MN
0039
CA Sinner
l58B
56360
l5 32 24 32 0043
Michael J & Carol Hawke
22ll - l59th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 3l 0024
Luke A & Penny J Carda
2104 - l59th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 3l 002l
Thomas & Patricia Hopkins
2158 - l59th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
'l5 32 24 32 0046
Rodney L & Danya J
Lundgren
l60ll Swallow st
Andover, MN 55304
15 32 24 3l 0009
Richard & AM Kjelgaard
l6028 Quinn st NW
Andover, MN 55304
<15 32 .24 3l 0033 ~,l5 32 24 3l 0013
Dale & Lynette Kratochwi ) D<:lYt:on D Edminster
l604l Quinn NW ,21l5 - l59th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304 Aridover, MN 55304
'; 32 24 3l 0020
~ctyton D Edminster
2115 - l59th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
/l5 32 24 3l 0018
Clayton I & EA Peterson
204l - l59th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
l5 32 24 3l 0016
Mark A & E .Boeshans
2078 - l59th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
" )
G
. rl5'32 24 3l ODl9
Dayton<D Edminster
2115 - 159th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
~l5 32 24 F 0026
Virgil H & Elaine B Hoppe
205l - l59th Lane NW '
AndoveF, MN 55304
l5 32 24 3l 0027
Gerald A & Marilyn Ryding
2032 - l59th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
(2 units)
, .--
"
.'
I.
'-
'~ --"
:~15 32 24 3l 0014
Dayton D Edminster
2115 - l59th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
,'l5 32 24 3l OOlO
~William D & DS Hanscome
203l - l59th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
.;:.,!.'.....".....~...
"-- '-,: ...,.
"
.-;t
:jl~ \
;' ......J
-',
....;,. ,
cl'
t
~
",if ~
~ ~ J..
~ ~ \'
" ,f
,
,/"'.,
,If ,
(1'
A
@
@)'
~ 2"
, ...
\
,
C,NTERS
',.~~i:;......"'::-
Jf'T."
J~~.'"
-~.....
.N
N~_.
"'; ~
-"''''-'',
-(
-,,:,/.~
(a) v'
".r'~
.
~~
(fh'l
~'~.:;
';' ~ ~
:~~"'-i
I
(i) l
I'
l~
(~) ,
b _,__:(J)
1,'---
: ,r'iU".I1
~:
,
]' M
f;,J
I'r~1
..I"r..~J1-_..
:~
~~
I c:~1
w.4
0.1
-z
\<J.
....l'1
a.:,
il~;1
~'-
I', 'I
I i~ ~ I
i~:\T
I ! ~ ~ I
-'~_.
!{ . I
!~. ~ I
-1"_"_
i : I
I !
II" l
f'
..l.':' :p
(\,~I'
. I......l~-'::.. (17'O%J
~_.;.n " ~~, {oj
.J: -" ....<t:,.~
i ' ';~ (.::~~,
.' ,
lir)
(~7~~1
(J)
('''01
(~)
rrn1l
VI)
(~'l!I'
(lzl
("pz.;
!;I)
r~7~}
rriIJ
/,;
('17~J
(7)
(mW
!...
,
~ :1
. ~ :"
. :
!.;
"
,
,~
i'
.:c..:'.70
'''--l
I'
~
~
~
::::::
......
, ~f;
,.
i "
I ;,
~
t
~
.....
..........,
....
r~'
L'/'
".........
.......
~
h..
~
......
B
:11
d.'irit ,.r-,,;'"
It)
.~,)
:...""
.........
...........
--
\,
" )
41
a..sses.$Cl.ble lJ.(\I'-rS
tS::I
\;jJ
,/,~""d"',"""'''''''\,
':' "\t.J:.,
4."--""\~
~, 1 ,6
\.~ "", -'f
'\., A1i1
'~h. 1iI#
"""'~-......"*'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE November 5
1991 (\
ITEM
NO.
...:3.
Assessment Hearing/
88-30
BY:
V. V01k\\'
APPROYEl \ FOR
AGENr;1A / t j
BV'P-
AGENDA SECTION .
NQ D1Scuss1on Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
An assessment hearing has been scheduled for 7:30 P.M. for
sanitary sewer and watermain assessments on Lot 3, Block 4,
Hartfiel's Estates as requested by the property owner, Ken Heil
in a letter dated August 29, 1988.
Attached is the notice of hearing, the letter requesting sewer
and water, a copy of the assessment roll and a resolution
adopting the assessment roll.
V:Attach.
COUNCIL ACTION
\ MOTION BY
I
-'
- TO
SECOND BY
,.,
&8-3:J
Vi~i volt. ~n
, .
: )
'-
" i" ~.. '".'.''' ~'~'';;'D'"
'UJ . .. ~
~ ;It~. . lu ~ I \~.~. :~
". r. \, i
I.. " \;,. ..~ l J """
nrAUG ;-~'l;~;l
CITY OF MJOOVER
AUGUST 29, 1983
CITY OF ANDOVER
SANITARY SEWER & WATER DEPARTMENT
AfJ(:'OVER, MINN.
ATTN: fiR JIM SCHRANTZ, CITY ENGINEER
RE: PETITION FOR SANITARY SEWER & WATER SERVUICES
TO WHOC1 IT MAY CONCERN:
WE HEREBY SUBMIT TO THE CITY OF ANDOVER, A PETITION REQUEST FOR SANITARY SEWER & WATER SERVICES TO:
LOT 3, BLOCK 4 , HARTFIEL'S ESTATES
14554 BLUEBIRD STREET
AtWOVER, M INN.
PER VERBAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM MR. DAVE ALMGREN, CITY BUILDHlG INSPECTOR; THE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE PENDING
WAC & SAC & HOOKUP CHARGES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
SAC & HOOK-UP CHARGE
~IAC & HOOK -UP CHARGE
$3324.14
$3663.67
---------
---------
TOTAL ASSESSMENTS
ALLOWABLE AMOUNT FOR COUNTY TAX ASSESSMENTS
H.'m.81
$6246.:31
---------
---------
AMC~NT PAYABLE TO CITY AT TIME (f BUILDING PERMIT $741.00
WE HSqEBY WAIVE THE REQUIREMENTS OF A PUBLIC HEARING.
WE WWLll APPRECIATE YOUR PROMPT 1< H1MEllIATE ACTION ON THIS PETITION TO ALLOW GmJSTRUCTION OF A NEW RESIDENCE ON THE LOT
YET THIS SEASON.
!' YOURS ~RI LYllY"
,.;) L--1"
KEN HqIL. 0 JE'
1425 ~[, IVER Bm.
ANtJOVER, MINN. 55304
)
'-../
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
. '\
.....~
PROJECT 88-30
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Andover,
Anoka County, Minnesota will mp.et at the Andover City Hall, l685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of Andover, on November 5,
1991 at 8:30 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for the
improvement of watermain and sanitary sewer
in the following described area:
Lot 3, Block 4, Hartfiel's Estates
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot,
or parcel of land is $ 6,246.81 You may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the entire
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment to the City Treasurer. No interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City
Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to December 3l of the year in which such payment is
made. Such payment must be made before November l5 or interest will
be charged through December 3l of the succeeding year. If you decide
not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the .
assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of lO ypars and shall hear interest at the rate of
8.0 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the assessment
rs-not available.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at
the City Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed asseRsment
is $ 6,246.8l Written or oral objections will be considered
at tne-meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount unless a
signed, written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the
hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The
Council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of
a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such
further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 429.08l by serving notice of the appeal
upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption
of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court
within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
"
'J
~u'
Vlctorla Volk - City Clerk
'" 11._ l,.U.
("
\
',,-J[""-"j"" ,,' ,,' I"
:i:.~_ ~"- ...:. .~.l-;.: ""LJ.l.l. ~;.
I
'I"
: '~. i_t:!.l~l:..l. :-:
, ", I,
,
i.:. ~"L 'lL~ ~ 1 1_'
.:.1', ii"~
1".',-
,
I
,
lJJ-f;-Ul
(oJ mO t-"
o-..JmlJ)
. . . UI
lJ)lJJlJ).J:-
enUl--J
lJ)WUI
(oJ CD .po t-"
o -..J (oj ul
. . . UI
l.O -..J [l) U1
(1'1(.11......
lJJ (..J UI
(.J .::- CD ~
, o~en UI
. . . UI
l.O(.J(tI en
ene-en
,
"
l.Or(I[l'I
(oj ul (..J ~
" :? :-J ~.J UI
UI
lJJ(.J[l'I --J
"''''0
,
u)(I)(\"l
" (.J .po CD ~
, o"'~ UI
. . UI
lJJ(\"lr(1 0>
",0>0>
I
uJ~--J
(.JW(oJ ~
:?~~ uJ
uJ
U1uJO UI
(T'l (.J (oJ
U1~--J
t.J(.JlJJ m
o [I) CD 0
0
uJO>~ 0
en ..... 1I1
uJ 0>
(oJ(\"l(Tl ro
aOJmo
. . . 0
l.OlJJO....
'" en c,
"
'''---./
,
,
~ , ~j;;;j~Ll;mm;18 :tIEl:m [I'lI;; ,; IT~j~I"
-": .-. r; ...... '"""
~
""'\
(
';;I~
rn
"
("
r:
r
r
n
,:;1"
1.1 I'''!
f")
"
ir'!
D
~ UI
UI
m m
UI
UI
~
CT
~
m
c
j
~,
.,.
UI
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKl\
STl\TE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
~J
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
SANITARY SEWER AND WATER
FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 88-30 FOR CERTIFICATION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to a proper notice duly given as required by law,
the council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the
proposed assessment for the improvement of sanitary sewer and
water
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to
be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1992 and shall
bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum trom the date of
the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment
should be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
resolution until December 31, 1991. To each subsequent installment
when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid
installments.
3. The owners, of any property so assessed may, at any time prior
to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole
of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged
if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the
resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City
Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is
made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be
charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
the City Council at a
meeting this
and adopted by
day of
, 19
, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was
declared passed.
, '\
'J
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria volk - City Clerk
,/~""r"'w.."""",,\,
:-j?-'\,
:1 !J
,)\ }
'"'-~'-;_>f~~'~
~:lIOI.".~,"",''''
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
Discussion Items
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
November 5, 1991
ITEM
NO.
Assessment Hearing/
91-14/168th Lane N.W.
Jim Schrantz
B
BY:
The city Council scheduled an assessment hearing for 8:00 P.M.
for project 91-14 168th Lane N.W., a MSA street.
The improvement hearing was held on August 6, 1991 and the
estimated costs were $2,300.00 per unit.
The proposed assessment is $1,980.00 per unit at 8% interest for
10 years.
Parcel #13 is part of the assessment calculations but we are
proposing not to assess the lot at this time as it is not
buildable unless a lot of fill is brought in. If the lot becomes
buildable we will assess the lot at that time.
Attached: Resolution
Notice
List of property owners
Map showing unit
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
-~) TO
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
~-)
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
STREET AND STORM DRAINAGE
FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 91-14 FOR CERTIFICATION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to a proper notice duly given as required by law,
the council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the
proposed assessment for the improvement of street and storm
drainage
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to
be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1992 and shall
bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum from the date of
the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment
should be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
resolution until December 31, 1991. To each subsequent installment
when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid
installments.
3. The owners, of any property so assessed may, at any time prior
to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole
of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged
if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the
resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City
Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is
made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be
charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
the City Council at a
meeting this
and adopted by
day of
, 19
, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was
declared passed.
::J
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
~)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 91-14
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Andover,
Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of Andover, on November 5,
1991 at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for the
improvement of street and storm drainage construction
in the following described area:
168th Lane between Round Lake Blvd. and 350' west of Crocus Street
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot,
or parcel of land is $1,980.00 You may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the entire
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment to the City Treasurer. No interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City
Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is
made. Such payment must be made before October 15 or interest will
be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide
not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the
assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years and shall bear interest at the rate
of 8 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the
assessment is not available.
The proposed assessment rollison file for public inspection at
the City Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment
is $ 27,742 written or oral objections will be considered
at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount unless a
signed, written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the
hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The
Council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of
a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such
further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal
upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption
1 of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court
within ten days after service upon the Mayor or"Clerk.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
~
~
09 32 24 31 0016
Mark D & SK Gardner
3009 - 168th Ln NW
Andover, MN 55304
"
0)32 24 31 0013
Duane & Patricia Neas
2844 - 169th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
09 32 24 31 0002
Robert & Lori
schwichtenberg
2934 - 168th Ln NW
Andover, MN 55304
09 32 24 32 0002
Jerry W & Susan Rick
3109 - 168th Ln NW
Andover, MN 55304
09 32 24 32 0011
David or Lila Hamers
3110 - 168th Ln NW
Andover,MN 55304
'-
, )
'~
_, 0 9 32 2 4 31 0 0 1 7
. Keith E & JC Lorensen
2935 - 168th Ln NW
Andover, MN 55304
09 32 24 31 0010
Donald J & Kay J zywicki
2820 - 168th Ln NW
Andover, MN 55304
09 32 24 31 0012
David A & Barbara Tuttle
3008 - 168th Ln NW
Andover, MN 55304
09 32 24 32 0010
Donald J & Barbara Kulla
3146 - 168th Ln NW
Andover, MN 55304
09 32 24 32 0012
Elizabeth D. Travis
3046 - 168th Ln NW
Andover, MN 55304
09 32 24 31 0019
stanley L & BL Roshau
2857 - 168th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
09 32 24 31 0011
DJ & DE Schabert
2857 - 167th Ln NW
Andover, MN 55304
09 32 24 32 0001
Gerald E Durham
16881 Round Lk Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
09 32 24 32 0005
Mark C Voth
3045 - 168th Ln NW
Andover, MN 55304
~)
'; \~ ~
,,", -k.~ -'
'3l- """
,,, \J\
{~
'f.-...~
~~
-,
',--)
-
1/11
II
II
1/
1/
1/
~
i<i
o
c
=
1\
~
g
g
z
o
..
u
:>
a:
..
en
z
o
u
0-
"'..
ll! "'a:
.. ltI '"
"';:';0
c "''''
'" ~'"
~ -:!
0. .. a:
0"'0
0: X I-
0. ",,,,
1'1
"
o'
o'
.1
01
"
~
1'= ~ 0
- t\I 0 -
~ ~ N "
~
.~
"
0
U
0 Ul
lIJ
~ j
~ . N
~ ~
Ul ""'" Z
~
~
t\I
=-
~
t\I
c:>
~
I---
-,---.
: J_~_
Q
o^,e 3>lV1 ONnOl!
"
8 05; pi
1 !i~ HI
6hi ~z
ma:<l:<l: II!
~~ a.
lIJ
a::
::l
Cl
G:
.r
~
I
0>
ci
z
8
...,
0
a::
n.
'"
~ on
;:
(}
-2
"
0
"
!z
UJ
:::E
~ ;;
~
a::
n. ..;
~ ~ w
z
0 t;j ;;
~ III lIJ
lIJ ~
Z
0- Z
:i lIJ
Z . z
0 a:: :5
~ ~:5 0-
W
a:
U 0 lXJ on
g ~ to ...
ii/r~/,',.,"~e~e",>,~'t\,
(( )I
"', Jil'
'-~)\ .,e
~~~_'!If..;*'i1,~1"~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
November
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Discussion Items
Admin.
ITEM
NO.
S.
Assessment Hearing/
91-1/Crosstown Drive
James E. Schrantz
BY:
The City Council scheduled an assessment hearing for 8:15 P.M.
for Project 91-1 Crosstown Drive, a MSA street.
The improvement hearing was held on April 16, 1991 and the
estimated costs were $300.00 per unit.
The proposed assessment is $292.00 per unit at 8% interest for
5 years.
There are 15 parcels with a total of 21 units.
Attach: Resolution
Notice
List of property owners
Map showing units
MOTION BY
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
'fa
~)
, ,
I
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
STREET CONSTRUCTION
FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 91-1 FOR CERTIFICATION.
WHEREAS, pursuant to a proper notice duly given as required by law,
the council has met and heard and pas~ed upon all objections to the
proposed assessment for the improvement of street construction
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ANDOVER,
MINNESOTA:
, 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of 5 years, the first of the installments to
be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1992 and shall
bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum from the date of
the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment
should be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
resolution until December 31, 1991. To each subsequent installment
when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid
installments~
3. The owners, of any property so assessed may, at any time prior
to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole
of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged
if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the
resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City
Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is
made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be
charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
the City Council at a
and adopted by
day of
meeting this
, 19
, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was
declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
victoria volk - City Clerk
r
)
~)
,CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROJECT No. 91-1
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Andover,
Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of Andover, on November 5,
1991 at 8:15 P.M. to' pass upon the proposed assessment for the
improvement of street construction
in the following described area:
Crosstown Drive
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot,
or parcel of land is $292.00 You may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the entire
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment to the City Treasurer. No interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City
Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is
made. Such payment must be made before october 15 or interest will
be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide
not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the
assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 5 years and shall bear interest at the rate of
8 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the assessment
rs-not available.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at
the City Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment
is $6120.00 Written or oral objections will be considered
at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount unless a
signed, written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the
hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The
Council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of
a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such
further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal
upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption
of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court
within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
f
Y c~ty Clerk
~
'33 32 24 11 0031
George W &LM Bunn
13920 Crosstown Drive
Andover, MN 55304
, ) 32 24 11 0028
hevin D & Debra G Thalin
13878 Crosstown Drive
Andover, MN 55304
'33 32 24 13 0027
Daniel J & Christal
Vanhout
13848 Crosstown Drive
Andover, MN 55304
/33 32 24 13 0024
Midwest Federal Savings
c/o TCF
801 Marquette Ave.
Mpls, MN 55402
: 133 32 24 13 0046
T.F. James Co.
P.O. Box 24137
Mpls, MN 55424
(4 units)
'33 32 24 13 0071
Donna L Green
2730 137th Lane NW
Andover, MN 55304
"-
-~
@
.~.;'33 32 24 11 0030
Paul K & Catherine M otl
13910 Crosstown Drive
Andover, MN 55304
"33 32 24 14 0037
Elbert C & Joan A Bowlby
13868 Crosstown Drive
Andover, MN 55304
'33 32 24 13 0026
Marlin R & Marilyn K Luft
13838 Crosstown Drive
Andover, MN 55304
"33 32 24 13 0005
Gerald E & JE Holderness
13730 Crosstown Drive
Andover, MN 55304
(3 units)
- "33 32 24 11 0029
Francis W Peterson
13900 Crosstown Drive
Andover, MN 55304
'33 32 24 13 0028
Larry & Joyce Anderson
13858 Crosstown Drive
Andover, MN 55304
'33 32 24 13 0025
Dorothy May Hudson
13828 Crosstown Drive
Andover, MN 55304
"33 32 24 13 0014
G.M. Investment Co.
P.O. Box 547
Anoka, MN 55303
(2 units)
'33 32 24 13 0060
Paul A & Lisa R Scherver
13784 Crosstown Drive
Andover, MN 55304
w i ...
'" I
a:
" . 0
0
) u tt 1 Z
c '" .iI ~
w ;;
, . " 0'0
w '"
is .. w i::
~
.. .. Z
:> ~ ..
u <(
0 a: -
:z :z .. m gco
.:::. i i .. 0:
..
:> :> => 0 ... -...
2 t: ... oR o ~.! "';:
0 .. .. . .::.= .
Zw . c:~- ~-
. . Hi!
.. .. 0.. ..
-~ ::Oe
t.. ~ ~ E
Wo o 0
(J') :z au
--l
<(
U
a..
>-
l-
, C
c.~ 0
-
o~ CJ
:J
...
-
rJ-~ (/)
C
~Q 0
~
CJ ...
I ca
Cl> ... -
a: 0
Q) III
ci OJ
::: c::
z c:
Z - ~
'\ CJ
Cl> Cl> .
...
> .-' Cl>
o >
... ... 0
C 0..-0
>.C::
c:: =<:
:: (.,)
0
-
III
III
, 'Ill" 0
...
SCHERVER U
31J11/
t;'
! i ..
; i ~ ~
..
i ~ ..
, .. (/)
<I) E
E (;
(; (/)
in 't)
co ..
of ..
!Z ~ 0
Q.
0
W x ~
~ ...
~-) Cl ,l I
~~~
r
!
I
!;;'f';~/""-"""""''''''''''\''''':;~
. ,
;-[\ .i~
~" il
'-) .~,
"'I ,;i~
~'!IIjr;,,,",,,,,,,,,,'!li<~,,-'I!i!'-'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE November 5, 1991
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
Kelsey Estates Final
Plat, Cont.
BY:
Todd J. Haas
BY:
Non-Discussion Items
Engineering
The City Council is requested to approve the final plat for
Kelsey Estates (Phase V of the Andover West preliminary plat) as
requested by Jerry and Carol Windschitl in Section 19 & 20-32-24.
(A copy of the final plat is in your October 15, 1991 packet.)
This item was tabled from the October 15, 1991 meeting to allow
the staff, developer and other interested parties to meet and
discuss the issue regarding the exception lot that is indicated
on the final.
Comments:
A short meeting was held and parties agreed to have the Park and
Recreation Commission meet to discuss this issue. A special
meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission was held on October
30, 1991. The Commission has reviewed and recommended that Lot
1, Block 7 be dedicated for park dedication (area to be used for
parking for Kelsey-Round Lake Park) and allow the property owner
to develop the exception lot for a home site. The Commission did
express their concern that there was a misunderstanding as to
this agreement for Lot 1, Block 7 for the platting of those lots
located along Xenia Street NW.
It is also the City Attorney's interpretation that a park
dedication shall be made on the exception lot because a metes and
bounds description has been created (Ordinance 10, Section
9.07.10).
Other Comments:
A. The City Council at the last meeting, per the minutes, stated
that the 20 foot access to Kelsey-Round Lake Park is
acceptable. In reviewing Ordinance 8 which is administered by
the City Planner, the driveway setbacks are required to be 5
feet as indicated in Section 8.08 E.3.(f). Maximum driveway
width within the Park access will allow only 10 feet.
COUNCIL ACTION
, \ MOTION BY
'- ) TO
SECOND BY
'\
'-- ../
"-
, \
, '-.J'
B. Attached is the resolution approving the preliminary plat of
Andover West. The City Council may want to address the issue
of Lot 13 and Lot 14 of Block 7 (Lot 2 & 3 of Block 2 Kelsey
Estates) that may have potential historic clay pits.
C. The City Attorney presenting a favorable title option.
D. Security to cover legal, engineering, street sign and
installation costs as determined by the City Engineer. $1,500
has been received but additional security is necessary.
E. The developer provide a perfor~ance bond or a one-year
warranty escrow as determined for the street and storm sewer
improvement as determined by the City Engineer.
F. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site
which is to be determined by the City Engineer or if the site
is completed, a letter from the developer's engineer that lots
and streets are graded according to the grading plan submitted
and approved by the City. (Developer has an option to enter
into a development contract. It is staff's understanding that
the grading and certification by the developer's engineer will
be complete prior to signing of the final plat).
G. Street lights costs to be paid to Anoka Electric Cooperative.
Costs to be determined by Anoka Electric Cooperative.
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
'--)
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF KELSEY ESTATES
AS BEING DEVELOPED BY JERRY AND CAROL WINDSCHITL IN SECTION 19 &
20-32-24.
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preliminary plat of
Andover West ; and
WHEREAS, the developer has presented the final plat of
Kelsey Estates
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed such plat for conformance
with the preliminary plat; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City
Andover to hereby approve the final plat of
contingent upon receipt of the following:
1. The City Attorney presents a favorable title opinion.
Council of the City of
Kelsey Estates
2. Security to cover legal, engineering, street sign and installation
costs as determined by the City Engineer.
3. The developer provide a performance bond or a one-year warranty
escrow as determined by the City Engineer.
4. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site which
is to be determined by the City Engineer or if the site is
completed, a letter from the developer's engineer that lots and
streets are graded according to the grading plan submitted and
approved by the city.
5. Street lights costs to be paid to Anoka Electric Cooperative.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED citing the following:
1. Variance for the cul-de-sac length for 152nd Lane NW as this
exceeds the maximum allowed from Ordinance 10, Section 9.03g.
length is 645 feet.
2. Park Dedication as determined by the Park and Recreation
Commission.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of
, 19
CITY OF ANDOVER
,~
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
ATTEST:
victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO. R 70-80
'\
"~ A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ANDOVER WEST, PRESENTED BY
ANDOVER ~ROPERTIES FOR PROGRAMMED LANDS, INC.
WHEREAS, pursuant to notice published thereof,. the Planning and Zoning
Commission conducted a public hearing on April 28, 1980, on the Preliminary Plat
of Andover West; and
WHEREAS, as a result of such hearing and review, the Planning and
Zoning Commission is recommending approval of the Plat; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission cites as reasons for such
recommendation as being l)the plat has received approval from the County Highway
Department, 2)the engineering firm of TKDA has reviewed the Plat and is recommending
approval, 3)the p,lat is subject to meeting road standards of the City of Andover,
4)a public hearing was held and no apposition was met to the intent of the Plat,
5)required variances are approved, 6)a letter has been received from United Power
Association with no abjections, 7)a letter has been received from Northern
Natural Gas Co. with no objections, 8)the Park Board has reviewed the Plat and
has made a recommendation to the City Council regarding Parkland, and 9)the Plat
is consistent with the Comprehensive Development Plan and meets the basic intent
and application of its ordinances; and that all lots front on interior streets
and do not front an County Road No.7, and also do not front an stub streets; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did review the Plat on the 20:h day of May, 1980
and do to an error in the calculation for park dedication it was referred back
to the Park & Recreation Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission as
requested by the Oeveloper; and
WHEREAS, both Commissions did again review the Plat and address the
requirements of Ordinance No. 10 and Ordinance No. 100; and
.)~
~~~ WHEREAS, another recommendation for approval was submitted by the
~~' ~~ Planning and Zoning Commission with additional reasons for such action being
+ ~~~ l)parklands equal to 10% of the total Plat have been included, 2)Lot 13 and
,./.". LLot 14 of Block 7 have been set aside far potential parkland if it is found
"1\ the historic clay pits may be located on these lots, 3)a IS' walkway to
LakeRidge Park is being dedicated along the east side of Lot 1, Block 7,
4)Blackfoot Street will be dedicated to a full 66' width, and 5)an additional
variance for 152nd Circle is required; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is in agreement with those reasons stated
by the Planning and Zoning Commission; and
, WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges the property owners to the
south Of the Plat abjections to the locations of the most southerly streets; and
WHEREAS, the City Council cannot obligate a developer to construct
streets so as to provide additional frontage for the development of adjoining
propert i es; and
i-J
. WHEREAS the City Council is allowed by ordinance to require a developer
to provide for the extension of existing streets which has been done in the
Andover West Plat.
e
'\
'-)
<II
.",
'-J
NOW. THEREFORE, _ IT RESOLVED by the City Coun~ .- of the City of
Andover to hereby approve the Prel iminary Plat of Andover West as S'ubmitted under
the date of June 4. 1980.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover to hereby
approve the following exceptions within the Plat with such exceptions required due
to topography of the land:
a. Lot 9. Block 7 - Lot Size (Ordinance No. 10. Section 9.06)
b. Inca Circle and 152nd Circle NW - Cul de Sac Length (Ordinance No. 10.
Section 9.03g)
c. 153rd Avenue Northwest between Highway No. 7 and Fox Street,
152nd Avenue Northwest between Highway No. 7 and Fox Street,
153rd Avenue Northwest between Eldorado Street and 155th Avenue Northwest.
154th Avenue Northwest between Eldorado Street and 155th Avenue Northwest,
Hopi Street between Eldorado Street and 155th Avenue Northwest, ,
Blackfoot Street between Eldorado Street and 155th Avenue Northwest -
Block Length (Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.05a)
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover
to hereby accept parkland as shown on the Plat, dated June 4th, 1980; with the
understanding that should it be found the historic clay pits are located on
Lots 13 and/or Lot 14 of Block 7. such lot(s) would be substituted for potential
parkland.
J BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover
to hereby require the dedication of a 30' walkway/utility/roadway/drainage
easement in place of the IS' easement shown on the Plat dated June 4th, 1980;
with such easement to go to LakeRidge park.
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Andover
to hereby make such approval contingent on the requirement that Guarani Street
and Blackfoot Street be shown with appropriate turnarounds; and that lots be
shaded to indicate if the 39,000 square foot requirement of Ordinance No. 10C
is met.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 17th
June , 1980, by unanimous vote.
day of
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Patrlcla K. Lindquist - Clty Clerk
,~ I ';, /j ....-/
j.,,-!~__ ~t/~
Jjrry ; dschltl - Mayor
1\:\
~
,,~
ANDOVER PARK COMMISSION
REQUEST FOR PARK IlECOMAfENDATlON
DATE October 30. 1991
ITEM
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
4. Kelsey-Round Lake
Park Dedication
Engineering~~
BY: Todd J. Haas
The Park and Recreation Commission is requested to discuss
the Park Dedication requirements for the overall plat known
as Andover West. The original preliminary plat (date June 4,
1980) gross land area is 360.4 acres of which 36.07 acres was
originally proposed as park dedication which is 10% as
required in Ordinance 10, Section 9.07.
Kelsey Estates Final Plat has been presented to the City
Council at their meeting of October 15, 1991. In reviewing
the final plat, the developer did not include a parcel
(indicated as exception on the plat) as park. The Andover
West preliminary plat indicates this as future park.
History
On February 5, 1991 City Council meeting, a motion was made
that the City Council agree or accept the proposal from the
owner New Generation Homes to dedicate Lot 1, Block 7 of the
preliminary plat of Andover West for park purposes. On
February 12, 1991 Mr. Bachman restated his understanding of
the park dedication/platting of the property (see attached
letter).
It is Staff's interpretation that if Lot 1, Block 7 as
indicated in the letter is for park dedication, then the land
dedicated would be given credit to future park dedication
requirements. The developer of Kelsey Estates is requesting
releasin~ the exception lot as park dedication and allow the
developer to develop a parcel so that the property owner can
construct a home.
To date, the city and Mr. Bachman do not have an agreement
for the 4 lots at Co. Rd. 20 and Xenia Street NW which would
allow the developer to plat but would not require
construction of streets or grading of lots.
In addition, Staff has included the resolution approving the
preliminary plat of Andover West.
"
---J
e9
,,--
--~d."cu1 me:;dowi- S-rl.. AJc:
~;,=
Regula~ City Council Meeting
Minutes - Feb~ua~y 5, 1991
Page 4
\
,)
~
INDIAN MEADOWS DISCUSS!ON/5-YEAR PtAN/PARK BOARD
M~. Haas explained the Pa~k Boa~d's p~oposal fo~ the development of
Kelsey Pa~k to Include access f~om CoRd 20 and a pa~king lot at the
no~th end of the pa~k. They have been wo~king with the develope~ of
the p~ope~ty Involved to get the pa~king lot befo~e the land is
developed. Wayne Bachman, New Gene~ation Homes, has made a p~oposal
to dedicate Lot 1, Block 7 on the p~elimina~y plat of Andove~ West fo~
the pa~kIng lot, to dedicate 8.1 ac~es which would exceed the
dedication ~equi~ement fo~ the balance of thei~ p~ope~ty, and to pay
up to $20,000 fo~ the g~ading and installation of Xenia St~eet fo~
access to the pa~king lot.
M~. Haas stated the Staff ~ecommendation is to allow M~. Bachman to
plat and dedicate the ~ight of way and all the land up f~ont without
developing the p~ope~ty. The City would allow him to plat, but no
building pe~mits would be issued until XenIa St~eet is const~ucted to
City standa~ds.
Wayne Bachman - stated they ag~ee to do that p~ovided they would
obtain plat app~oval then so they know what they can do on thei~
p~ope~ty. They would be p~oposing some changes to Andove~ West
f~om what was o~iginally app~oved and-asking that the plat be
finalized p~io~ to the const~uction of Xenia. They would const~uct
the ~oad when they develop the fou~ lots su~~oundIng it.
Pa~k and Reo~eation Commission Chai~pe~son Jeff KIeffe~ told the
Council the p~oposal p~ovides the access they desI~e off CoRd 20.
They would p~efe~ the a~ea with the pond to be dedIcated, but they
unde~stand that would landlock some p~ope~ty fo~ the develope~. They
would like the City to acqui~e the pond a~ea if possible.
Council ag~eed to the p~oposal, noting the Development Ag~eement would
spell out the conditions cegacding Xenia St"eet.
MOTION by Jacobson, Seconded by Pe~~y, that we accept the p~oposal
of the ownec of New Genecation Homes ~ega~dIng what Is known as Indian
Meadows V in the p~oposal to open up Xenia St~eet and dedIcate tot 1,
Block 7 of that p~elimina~y to the City foe pack pucposes; and
autho~ize the CIty Attocney to wock out the p~opeC" legal documentatIon
to satisfacto~ily make that,t~ansfec, and autho~ize the Mayo~ to
execute the documents. Motion ca~~ied unanimously.
STREET tIGHT REQUEST/142ND LANE AND ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD
M~. Haas ~eviewed the ~equest of fou~ p~opeC"ty owne~s to install a
st~eet lIght at 14267 Round Lake Bouleva~d with each petitIone~ paying
1/4 of the monthly costs fo~ the lIght. He also outlIned the options
avaIlable to the CouncIl.
,J
e9
REISLlNG PARI{
NOmH
Mr. Todd Haas
Cit~l of ;";:dover
Andover, MN 55304
CITY OF ANDOVER
Re: India~ Meadows IV & V and Park Land Dedication
~ear ~.1=. H::;.;:;,s.
After ~eeting with the Pdr~ Board and City Council, I tho~ght it would
be appropriate to restate my understanding of where we are concerning
park dedication/platting of our property in Andover. In order to assist
the park board in meeting its concerns regarding access fro~ County Rd
20 to Kalsey Park, as part of the approval of the plats for Indian
Meadows I7 a~d V, New Generation Properties would agree to the
following:
(1) Dedication of the approxirr.ate araa described as Lot 1 Block 7
on the pceliminary plat of Andover ~esti t~is area to be use~
to provide a parking area =cr acce3S to ~he park. The area
consists of appr~x~mdtely 3 a~res.
(2) Dedication of all of the 8.1 acres ou~lined in green c~ ~he
concept dra~ing and adjacen~ to the areas dedicatad as part
of the previo~s plats. In exchange the City Council WOuld
agree that the excess acreage above tha~ required for Indian
~eadows IV and V wou:d be credited to future park dedication
requirements in the event New Generation ?roperties, er a
s~ccessor ow~e= of the property, under~a~e pla~~ing c~ t~e
bala..ce of the property. The acreage to ba dedica~ed e~ceeds
t~a ';;.::,.::r~:l-=' d~dic~:.:..o:: =c::r..li=e~e~~ ::0= t:-=.e balanc~ of '~~1.:C
p=~pertl'" .
(3) New Generation Pr~perties wou:d dedicate, as part of a final
plat for Indian MeadowslY, that portion of Xenia Street from
County 20 to the new parking area. The final plat would be
filed wichout construction cf the streets or escrows or
letters of credit for construction 0= the i~provernent3. N~w
Generation Properties w011ld enter an agrearne~t with the City
to be recorded a~ainst each let stating that no building
pe~its could be drawn on any of the four lots until the
street construction was completed or sufficient escrows to
insure cornpletio~ were provided. At the time we decided to
develop the four lots, we would construc~ the street to normal
residential standards at our own cost. The south end of Xenia
\
'-)
Q9
February 12, 1991
Mr. Todd Haas
Page 2
~J
Street to be
for future
meantime, it
blade in and
requirements
constructed 3 feet below current grade to allow
grading of the balance of the site. In the
is our understanding that the park board would
gravel the dedicated roadway to meet the access
for Kelsey Park.
In addition to the above, I would like to use this opportunity to look
at an additional alternative. It is clear from the Park Board meeting
that the Park Board is interested in acquiring the pond and surrounding
land shown in green on the attached diagram. This property serves as a
great am~llity for our development. Howe'fer, in the currently proposed
2 1/2 acre lot size plat, whether the parcel's ownership is in private
or public hands is less important. The ownership of the property
clearly becomes important if the balance of the property is not
platted prior to the effective date for any new rules the city is
considering concerning a 10 acre minL~um lot size. Our ownership of
the pond property would mean one more lot could be included in the plat.
In view of the Park Board undertaking a study for the L~provement of
Kelsey Park, the Park Board's interest in the pond as an amenity for the
park and the City's decision to proceed with final platting process for
the four lots on Xenia Street without requiring street construction to
be completed before platting, New Generation is willing to propose the
dedication of the pond property at this time if a final plat can be
approved for the balance of our property. We would need an agree~ent
similar to the one discussed in regard to Indian Meadows:V. Such an
agreement would provide that the development of the lots would be
delayed and that the road elevations could be lowered to permit re~oval
of excess fill from the property. The City would ~~ediately gain the
additional park area sought by the Park Board and the Park Board's
consultant could include the pond in the current Park plan. New
Gene=at~on Properties wo~~d g~i~ t~e sec~~ity ~ega=d~~g the 21at~i~g
process neces3ary to give up title to the land. This would have the
fu~th~L be~c[~~ of complet~ng the davdlop~ent of ou= A~~cve= p=cpe=~y
with lots of a size and character consistent with the plats surrounding
it.
I hope the above meets with the approval of the City Council so that we
can both work together to meet our objectives.
Sincerely,
NEW GENERATION PROPERTIES, INC.
W~Q~
Wayne A. Bachman
Vice President
\
)
~
~
'\
, )
.4 r~ ,.... ~e
~ i cc... +~ CJ- S
!1..p.prDved ~ + /...
p~ C",,,,,,,,,,,,~" e
,-,-.d- c.' (HI
'W c:..,"M1~n
'\
'--)
.....
,
"
.;,
,...
:t.
. ""
" .'
"
,;4
:,1
...!
:)
,,10"
,:;s,
\
) - .~
. ,
~', .
.t.
.J"
:, .
:,,-.
e9;
:,;;'.
\
'-~
".~,...'''"''''-''~'".
,~? 1>
"# --I.,
,,",;l" '~,'"
,~ ~
J ~
~~ ,i
\ "
, ,/"
~
,
'-'"
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE November 5 - Ig91
Engineering
APPROV~D OR
AGEN~
/?
AGENDA SJ;CTION .
NQ D1Scusslon Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
'7
storm Drain Outlet
to Ditch 37
BY: James E. Schrantz
The city Council is requested to consider the plan for the storm
drain outlet to Ditch 37.
We have an application for a permit at the CCWD which will be on
the agenda on the 4th.
We have modified our proposal as follows:
We will drain the 159th Lane pond to the wetland on the Warren
property - then lower the culvert under the Warren driveway and
clean the ditch along Nightingale Street to Ditch 37. We propose
to pay the Warren's for the easement and ponding rights.
We hope to have the plans finalized by Tuesday night.
\ MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
,~,r""'C'""?~"""'_
'.f ~
:i ":l
; '\
) !j
- _ \~'''',^",~"""..".,,,,,,,il
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
November 5, 1991
ITEM
NQ Andover Comprehensive
g. Plan - Draft
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
BY: City Planner
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Discussion
REQUEST
The City Council is requested to discuss and approve the Andover
Comprehensive Plan. A public hearing was held at the October 22,
1991 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Please consult the
October 22, 1991 Planning and zoning Commission minutes included
with your packet materials for further details.
The Comprehensive Plan is scheduled to be submitted to the
Metropolitan Council on November 19, 1991.
~( :mNBY
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
~-)
'l~("""'"''''''''''~''''''\''
f "'~~.
~:l ;
~ ~
;~\',~
"i;, ,./
~""'''''' ",,' .~p
"~*~",~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
November 5, 1991
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg,
City Planner
P 1
ITEM Norman stout
NO. q. 1919 167th Avenue NW
BY:
AGENDA S.ECTION .
NQ D1Scusslon Items
REQUEST
The Planning and Zoning Commission at its regular meeting on
October 8, 1991, reviewed the request for a lot split by Norman
stout located at 1919 167th Avenue NW. The applicant has
requested to split a 10.0 acre parcel, described by metes and
bounds, into a 6.0 acre parcel and a 4.0 acre parcel. The
property is zoned R-l, Single Family Rural District. Please
consult the attached staff report and the minutes from the
October 8, 1991 Planning and zoning Commission meeting included in
your packet materials for further information.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval of the lot
split request with conditions as indicated on the attached
Resolution.
Attached are the Planning and zoning Commission packet materials
from the October 8, 1991 meeting and a Resolution for your review
and adoption.
COUNCIL ACTION
. MOTION BY
I
'-- TO
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
~~
RES. NO. R
-91
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE LOT SPLIT REQUEST OF NORMAN STOUT TO
CREATE TWO (2) PARCELS PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 40.
WHEREAS, Norman stout has requested a lot split on the
property located at 1919 167th Avenue NW, legally described as:
THE SOUTH 440 FEET OF THE EAST 990 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP
32, RANGE 24 (AS MEASURED ALONG EAST AND SOUTH LINES
THEREOF): EXCEPT ROADS; SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed
the request and has determined that said request meets the
criteria of Ordinance No. 40; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the
request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and would not
have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and
general welfare of the City of Andover; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no
opposition to said request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the lot split.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning and Zoning Commission to allow the lot split on said
property with the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall have the lots surveyed as required and pay
a park dedication fee of $400 upon City Council approval of
the proposed lot split.
2. The lot split request shall be subject to a one year sunset
clause as specified in Ordinance No. 40, Section III(E).
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
5th day of November, 1991
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, c~ty Clerk
"
'J
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST F,ORPLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE n~rnnor R. 10Q1
AGENDA ITEM
3. Public Hearing: Lot
Split - Norman stout
1909 167th Avenue NW
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg'
City Planner
BY:
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
AppJ.icant
Norman stout - 1909 167th Avenue NW (PIN 10-32-24-42-0003).
Request
The applicant has requested to split a ten (10) acre'parcel,
described by metes and bounds, into a six (6) acre parcel and a
four (4) acre parcel in an R-1, Single Family Rural District.
Applicable Ordinances
Ordinance No. 40 regulates the division of lots under 5 acres in
size. A lot split is defined as, "any division of a lot, parcel
or tract of land into not more than two (2) parcels when both
divided parcels meet or exceed the minimum requirements for
platted lots in the applicable zoning district".
Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02 establishes the provisions for
minimum lot width, lot depth and lot area in an R-1 zoned
district. The minimum requirements in an R-1 district are as
follows:
Lot
Lot
Lot
Width at Front Setback
Depth
Area Per Dwelling
300 feet
150 feet
2.5 acres
Ordinance No. 10, the Platting Ordinance, Section 9.06a(3)
requires areas lacking municipal sanitary sewer outside the
Metropolitan Urban Service Area to have a minimum of 108,900
square feet, of which 39,000 square feet of contiguous land area
is buildable with a minimum width of at least one-hundred fifty
(150') feet and a minimum depth of one-hundred fifty (150') feet
and has a width of three hundred (300') feet at the building
setback line.
Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07.10 establishes the minimum area of
land dedicated to park and open space. For all subdivisions by
metes and bo~nds description, the subdivider or developer may
elect to pay, in lieu of the park dedication requirements, the sum
of four hundred dollars ($400.00) for each dwelling unit that
could be constructed upon the proposed subdivided property. In
the event the developer elects to pay said four hundred dollar
($400.00) charge, the City may collect additional park fees if the
'" developer re-subdivides the property in the future.
'-----./
Page Two
Lot Split - Norman stout
~ 1909 167th Avenue NW
,~ October 8, 1991
Review
The applicant is requesting a lot split to separate his home and
4.0 acres and sell the resulting 6.0 acre lot as a single family
building si te.
Commission Options
1. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval of
the lot split request of Norman stout located at 1909 167th
Avenue NW.
2. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend denial of the
lot split request of Norman stout located at 1909 167th
Avenue NW.
3. The Planning and zoning Commission may table the item pending
further information from Staff.
staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the lot split requested by Norman
stout located at 1909 167th Avenue NW with the following
conditions:
1. The applicant shall have the lots surveyed as
required and pay a park dedication fee of $400 upon
City Council approval of the proposed lot split.
2. The lot split request shall be subject to a one year
sunset clause.
-,J
. ~."'.
-'.ji
"'-
(.',
: I :." ~,- -/- - ",
! =:-_~______________:_____~t~:=;3:;-~..;;-:..~~:~::\--~~~-~~'~~~7::_-:..:~....... "~'::"'~:-" .
~)
T1f
/0
@
"
,
"..,
- - .
I
, \
1
.\
..
IlIl
"'tL
. .dO
"
, '"
,,)
,.
"'.... '.
". .
, .
'-
"
,-
~
~
\"-.
.., "-.
: ,
:-~...
'.
..~ln
c/<..I6.
...:L
..-
---
.................-
, ,
"'-. "
i"-.
\,
'. : ~
. .1... . .
. .
:, _ ~ J60',' _
-------- -
.
.
.
..
,--
.'
.
-... ....-
(1.)
2/,~ Al"
-.-...~---...
,."':',-,,"-1
i
"
'j
.
"
0)
MY: ,& w;lt. ,,~>wY1
4>'; <;)<< 1/ J
- 1'1'
"
1-/
,0
.
,
.
,
.it...
'.
"'..
".
-'"
...... '.
':. '.
......
~'
'.
,
,
\.
.,
. .
. "
.
.
,.
'',.
.
.~.
(:~)
.
.
'-
'"
~
~
..
2L
~
So
..L
'.,
\ ,-'
.-- .- "
... 'O.... ..
.......,
",
,
,
,..~..
.........
SJJ,SC
+7J,!f
"
(1.)
( 72./c
.:D"",.;.1 Jot.,. i ~.
.
A.. 5,0
"
o
o
..
...
"
,
..,.~ "
,- '-
.~ "
,
, '
......
"
-, '- I
,o~/
......
...L
......."'.
.
I
(2)!
tlIJ;"
~
I
,
,
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 -
~ ~
I
\
\\
"
-.
~
)-- i
~ ~
\
~ ,~
C'<}
\. 1
~
---
~
'<::I
~ ~
~
~
'\ ~~
'-)
, ,
!,
, ,
"
, "-
".J
~s41tJ# .;cv-{7~d
~
~~
'4 ij-...
\.oj .
'=~
~~
s ~
~N
~ ~
t~
~ ~~ I
,
I
,
,
....
;:r-.
~
~ I
/
"
~
~
~
I
t
\
i
*-<.
\
1'-.)
, ...,
\.~
:~
i'\!,
\ ':',\
i,~-
i...~
i~
''<l
l<:l
il~"
/'
I
I
';:s
~
o
~
~
::i'
/&;" /'7. V
"-
'=:l
\.-.,
.......... \
i
--l
-rn,,"~
~. ~
, ~
n
-$-;.
, "-
, )' .,'
-~
41
~~
,
"-
"-
...
006'....
....
-
\
.--j
C"l\
N
C
a--~
l-
,..,.-.,
\
\
\
\
I
I
I
I
~
\
\
\
.....
-"
'\
'\
\.
\
/
....../
'"
\.
\.
"-
-
(
..
EB
CITY of ANDOVER
~
LOT SPLIT It
LOT SPLIT REQUEST FORK
Property Address IqP'1-lt7/t4t::Ure--lfIur ~~ --'~ 0!J""3CJLf
Legal Description of Property: ~ S Jf'lOrt (/p f;?9tJ fi of
(Fill in whichever is appropriate): N}(f -li ~~5e~ ()F SG-C-/tJ
T3'P--2 ~-
Lot Block Addition
Plat Parcel PIN /tJ-J-2- ~'i- ~1- -octO) Olt)??'!;
(If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
6(~
~# ~/~2Q
.f-, (A P a-.k,
Reason for Request
-yi2, .
Current Zoning A... /
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Applicant 1't~ ~
Address Iftct 9'- /&7.A:::tt.. ~ 111 W ~~~ oo-z3c/7'
Home Phone 703-?-/ 'if ~ Business Phone
Signature ~~ Date 9-/1/-9/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address
Home Phone
Business Phone
Signature
Date
'\
J
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-.a."V.L-tJirJ...L".L-
. PAGE 2
,/
Attach a scaled drawing of the proposed split of the property showing:
scale and North arrow; dimensions of the property and structures;
front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent street names;
location and use of existing structures within 100 feet.
~)
The date the property became a lot of record, the names and addresses
of all property owners within 350 feet of the property proposed to be
split, and the complete legal description of the subject property must
also be provided.
I hereby certify that this property has not been subdivided within
the last three years.
~~~
Signature of Appllcant
Lot Split Fee:
$50.00
$15.00
Date Paid
~~~ReceiPt
~~d
# 3c;Lf77
Filing Fee:
Park Dedication:
IffDo
Date Paid
Receipt #
Rev. 8-01-91
, '\
J
. A lot split may not be required if the request is:
1. A single parcel of land at least five (5 a.) acres in
size and three hundred (300') feet in width, and
2. All divided lots are at least five (5 a.) acres in size
and three hundred (300') feet in width, and
,)
3. All existing or newly created lots have frontage on an
approved right-of-way.
Moving interior lot lines for residential or commercial property may
be approved by the Zoning Administrator if the request:
1. Does not create any additional buildable lots, and
2. Does not create any lot which is below the standards for
the applicable zoning district in which it lies, and
3. Does not have an adverse effect on the surrounding
property.
All lot split requests must meet the following:
1. All resultant lots must have at least the mlnlmum width,
depth and square footage as required for any parcel of land
in the zoning district wherein the lot is located (see
Ordinance No.8, Section 6.02), and
,
o
2. No owner may utilize this method of land division on any
parcel more than one (1) time in any three (3) year period,
and
3. Pay a park dedication fee of $400.00 for each newly
created lot (see Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.07).
~
"J
t$
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, October 8, 1991 at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the lot split
request of Norman stout located on the following legally described
property:
THE SOUTH 440 FEET OF THE EAST 990 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 32,
RANGE 24 (AS MEASURED ALONG EAST AND SOUTH LINES .THEREOF):
EXCEPT ROADS; SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
(Generally located at 1909 167TH AVENUE NW)
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
A copy of the application and proposed lot split will be available
at Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
Vi~V~~City Clerk
Publication dates: September 27, 1991
October 4, 1991
,~
RiO 12 24 43 0003
David S. Athey
1928 167th Ave NW
Andover, MN. 55304
.,0 32 24 44 0006
~~onald M. Osman Sr.
1781 167th Ave. NW
Andover, MN. 55304
10 32 24 31 0005
Dale A. & Karen J. Jones
3532 136th Ave. N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
"-
)
'-...J
R10 32 24 43 0002
Lawrence & Vivian R.Morrell
1850 167th Ave. NW
Anoka, MN. 55304
10 32 24 41 0001
Vergal J. Buescher
9355 Krowa Tr.
Chaska, MN. 55318
10 32 24 34 0003
William L & Debra L Bradish
2050 167th Ave. N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
10 32 24 44 0004
Dale J. Howard
2816 135th Cir. N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
10 32 24 42 0004
Danny & Wanda M. Olson
1971 167th Ave. NW
Andover, MN. 55304
';?~/'" ',','~"eCo""h\
"~".:~
~ ~
jl ~
..". i,~, U
) , ,
'- '~;"","">,,,~_,,,,,,"i',,,,l
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
November 5, 1991
Discussion Items
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
BY: Ci ty Planner
ITEM Amend Ord. No. 10
NO.
/0. Sec. 9.03, 9.06, 11.01
AP:~ ,"aED FOR
AGe ~
BY:,
/
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to review the proposed
amendments to Ordinance No. 10, the Subdividing and Platting
Ordinance, Sections 9.03(g), 9.06(a)(3) and 11.01(a). The Council
should review the attached staff reports presented at the
September 24, 1991 Planning and zoning Commission meeting and the
October 22, 1991 City Council meeting.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The Planning & zoning Commission on September 24, 1991 made the
motion to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance amendments.
The Commission proposed additional changes to Section 11.0l(a),
extending the filing of the final plat from six months to one year
of the preliminary plat.
The Council on October 22, 1991 was concerned with temporary
cul-de-sacs as to when they should be used and who should be
responsible for their removal if and when streets are extended in
the future. Council was also concerned with the definition and
determination of mottled soils. Staff has addressed the temporary
cul-de-sac issue and has recommended changes. See the attached
ordinance amendment for those changes. The issue of the mottled
soils will be addressed by David Almgren, Building Official at the
meeting.
COUNCIL ACTION
) MOTION BY
'-- TO
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
~)
ORD NO. 10
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 10, THE SUBDIVISION AND
PLATTING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No. 10 is hereby amended as follows:
not
9.03g
~
)
~
11.0Ia. Filing of Final Plat. Within 5~*-+6+-meRtA5 one (1) year
following approval of the preliminary plat, unless an extension of
time is requested in writing by the subdivider and granted by the
Council, the subdivider shall file seven (7) copies of the final
plat with the Clerk and shall pay a filing fee thereof as set by
,,)
'\
',~
Page Two
Ordinance No. 10 Amendments
Council resolution. The final plat shall incorporate all changes
required by the Council, and in all other respects it shall
conform to the preliminary plat as approved. If the final plat is
not filed within 5~*-+6+-meA~R5 one (1) year following approval of
the preliminary plat, the approval of the preliminary plat shall
be considered void. The final plat may constitute only that
portion of the preliminary plat which the subdivider proposes to
record and develop at that time, provided that such portion shall
conform to all requirements of this Ordinance, and provided
further that the remaining portion or portions of the preliminary
plat not proposed to be recorded, developed and submitted as a
final plat, or ranted an extension, shall be subject to the right
of the City to a opt new or reV1se platting and subdivision
re ulations and shall be sub'ect to review b the Andover Review
Comm1 t tee ARC).
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 5th day of
November, 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
, \
'-~
,/~r<'''"''''"'C''O'''>\,>,
~ ~
,',',-','" ,"~,'"""
;~:j ';1.
!'j ~,
'~1 ij
~, j
'" ".,
-\~~"~,.,~",,-'fIj(1l4'c"
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
November 5, 1991
ITEM
NO.
I..
Ordinance 47
Amendment
Todd J. Haas
<5~
FOR
Discussion Items
Engineering
BY:
BY:
\
The City Council is requested to approve an ordinance amending
Ordinance No. 47, known as the Park Commission Ordinance.
Attached is the ordinance amendment.
The Park and Recreation Commission has reviewed the amendment and
recommends approval.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
-r
~)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 47
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 47, KNOWN AS THE PARK
COMMISSION ORDINANCE.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains:
Ordinance No. 47 is hereby amended as follows:
Section 2.
2.1 No firearms, as defined by Ordinance No. ~~~ 62, or
explosives shall be brought into or used in City parks except by
approval of the City Council.
2.2 Consumption or possession of alcoholic beverages is not
allowed only in areas of city parks designated by official-City
sign a~-~P4€R4€-A~€a~. Unless a ~€~~~4~€-~ Permit is obtained
under Section 2.3A, consumption or possession of alcoholic
beverages is prohibited in game field areas aR~ parking lots and
picnic areas. -
2.3 a. Afi-E~~~~~~~~-B~~ Permit may be approved by the City
Council and issued by the City Clerk for the selling of food,
alcoholic or non-alcoholic beverages as set out in City
Resolution.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of
, 19___
CITY OF ANDOVER
Attest:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
)
~/
"~--,j ~'~'>:,~;--:,~...~
i/'~/'''''''\
,~, '1',
;--1 ~t
':,;~;~, };
,) "{
-'."~~-~,,....."~,,,:Ji;"f;1tP
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
November 5, 1991
~
Section 7.01
DATE
ORIGINATJNG DEPARTMENT /)
Plann~ng ~
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
ITEM
NO.
leR .
BY:
AGENDA SECTION .
NO. D~scuss~on Items
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to review the proposed
amendment to Ordinance No.8, Section 7.01, Permitted Uses. The
amendment would allow Rural Agricutural Uses in areas zoned R-2
and R-3 outside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA).
Rural Agricultural uses are defined in Ordinance No.8, Section
3.02 as, "An area of five (5) or more contiguous acres which is
used for the production of farm crops such as vegetables, fruit
trees, grain and other crops and their storage on the area, as
well as for the raising thereon of domestic animals , non-domestic
animals and the raising and keeping of pleasure recreation
animals".
PLANNING AND ZONNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission at their October 8,
1991 meeting recommended approval of the attached ordinance
amendment. Please consult the minutes included in your packet
materials and the report presented at the October 8, 1991 meeting.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
,)
ORD NO. 8
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1971;
ORDINANCE NO. 8C, EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 17, 1978; ORDINANCE NO. 8BB,
EFFECTIVE APRIL 2, 1985; ORDINANCE NO. 8QQ, EFFECTIVE MAY 19,
1987; ORDINANCE NO. 8WW, EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 6, 1987; ORDINANCE NO.
8YY, EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 3, 1987 AND ORDINANCE NO. 8ZZ, EFFECTIVE
MARCH 15, 1988 KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No.8, effective January lr 1971; Ordinance No. 8C,
effective October 17, 1978; Ordinance No. 8BB, effective April
2, 1985; Ordinance No.8QQ, effective May 19, 1987; Ordinance No.
8WW, effective October 6, 1987; Ordinance No. 8YY, effective
November 3, 1987 and Ordinance No. 8ZZ, effective March 3,
1988 are hereby amended as follows:
SECTION 7.01
PERMITTED USES.
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS:
R-2 Single Family Estate District
Single family residential buildings.
Rural Airicultural Uses Outside Metropolitan Urban Service
Area On y.
Urban Agricultural uses.
R-3 Single Family Suburban District
Private sewer and water systems shall only be permitted on
every other lot or no more frequently that one private system
for each 40,000 sq. ft. where large lots are established.
This shall not apply to lots of record at the time this
Ordinance is adopted. On each new plat, the lots are to be
developed in accordance with this section and shall be so
designated.
Rural A ricultural Uses Outside Metro olitan Urban Service
Area On y.
Urban Agricultural uses.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 5th day of
November, 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
\_)
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
,- '1
',--./
"'"'/'~'C-:=C:_
~cr"~' .""'~
,-r'"i-t~
~',~
:"~,j '~'!!
~ ~
\,,)
~~~ "",-",,<t1"
''''l'~,~~~
DATE
November 5,
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
NQ Staff, Committee, Comm. Finance
ITEM 14. 1992 capital Equip.
NO. Public Works
Howard D. Koolick \1Y-..
Finance Director
BY:
REQUEST
B
The Andover City Council is requested to review that attached
information and provide direction to Frank Stone, Public Works
Superintendent, regarding the purchase of equipment in 1992.
BACKGROUND
At the previous meeting, the City Council requested information
regarding the maturity of equipment certificates issued in prior
years to determine if new equipment certificates could be issued
in 1992 without a substantial increase in taxes.
The City is levying taxes as follows for equipment certificates:
Year Issued
1986
1987
1989
1990
1991 Levy
$ 21,466
$ 39,022
$ 29,517
$ 29.870
$119,855
1992 Levy
$ -0-
$ 36,807
$ 27,466
$ 28,766
$ 93,039
1993 Levy
$ -0-
$ -0-
$ 26,022
$ 63,037
$ 89,059
Less anticipated
contribution from
Sewer Fund for 1990 Certificates
$ 37,630
$ 51,429
1994 Levy
$ -0-
$ -0-
$ 24,567
$ 59,624
$ 84,191
$ 37,630
$ 46,561
The 1989 issue matures in 1994 and 1990 issue matures in 1995.
COUNCIL ACTION
, '
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
~)
Frank stone has identified the following equipment as needed:
One new truck, plow, wing & sander
Hot box for patching streets
New bobcat
Parks tandem trailer
Tractor with rear & side mount and
front-mounted broom
One Toro
Four-wheel drive pickup with plow
$ 64,000
$ 50,000
$ 16,000
$ 3,500
$ 30,000
$ 12,000
$ 14,000
$189,500
To this amount must be added issuance costs for the debt.
Therefore, the city will need to issue $195,000 of debt. Assuming
interest rates equal to the 1990 issue (6.30%-6.70%), the
following would be the annual payments and levies needed:
Principal Interest Total Levy
1993 $ 39,000 $ 12,675 $ 51,675 $ 54,259
1994 $ 39,000 $ 10,218 $ 49,218 $ 51,679
1994 $ 39,000 $ 7,605 $ 46,605 $ 48,935
1996 $ 39,000 $ 5,031 $ 44,031 $ 46,233
1997 $ 39,000 $ 4,496 $ 43,496 $ 45,671
$195,000 $ 40,025 $235,025 $246,777
Please note that if the interest rates are lower, the payments
will decrease. Based on the economy over the last six months, I
would expect lower rates.
The annual levies are set at 105% of the total debt payment as
required by state law. The additional five percent is designed to
cover delinquencies so that the City has adequate funds to make
the debt payments.
CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS
1. Approve purchasing all the equipment with certificates of
indebtedness and authorize the Finance Director and Attorney
to begin the process in early 1992 as well as authorizing the
Public Works Superintendent to bid the equipment in 1992.
2. Decrease the amount of equipment and certificates of
indebtedness and authorize the Finance Director and Attorney
to begin the process in early 1992 as well as authorizing the
Public Works Superintendent to bid the equipment in 1992.
3. Table this item to a future meeting.
4. Decide to not purchase any of the equipment nor issue any
certificates of indebtedness.
, '\
'_J
~)
_"",~{<'ii""""'O_""\,~,
'/ ',~1..
, --'~
:t l
~~ ;1
" 11
,'" .f
~'" A
~"'~."'--,-, ,,'-~~~
."--~,,,,,,.'.,,ij~~--""
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
November 5, 1991
ITEM
NO.
/3.
NO.8,
Signs
David L. Carlberg
Planner
and
AGENDA SECTION .
NO. D1Scusslon
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT \)
Planning ~
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to review and
proposed amendments to Ordinance No.8, Section
Section 3.02, Definitions.
BACKGROUND
The Planning and zoning Commission, at their October 8, 1991
meeting, recommended that no changes be made to Section 8.07.
Consult the attached minutes from the October 8th meeting for
further details. Also attached is the staff report presented to
the Commission at the meeting. Please note the attachments to the
staff report.
The City Council on October 15, 1991, while reviewing the variance
request by Sign Services, Inc. on behalf of the Andover Volunteer
Fire Department, was made aware by Staff that the Planning and
Zoning Commission was recommending that no changes to Ordinance
No.8, Section 8.07 be made. Council as a result directed Staff
to readvertise the public hearing and bring a proposed ordinance
change to them that allows more flexibility to Ordinance No.8,
Section 8.07 for uses such as churches, institutional and
municipal buildings.
Attached for Council review are proposed amendments to Ordinance
No.8, Section 8.07 and Section 3.02. The amendments will
allow for more flexibility to the above listed uses and treats
them almost as if they were in a LB, Limited Business District.
COUNCIL ACTION
, - ) MOTION BY
'- TO
SECOND BY
~)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORD NO. 8
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, KNOWN AS THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No. 8 is hereby amended as follows:
SECTION 3.02
DEFINITIONS
The following items will be added to Section 8.07, Signs
SECTION 8.07, SIGNS
(C) Permitted Signs
(1) Residential Districts
Type: Residential Identification, Institutional,
Temporary
Size: Thirty-two (32 s.f.) square feet for non-
residential signs offering a residential
development for sale and institutional signs;
(2) "GR" and "LB" Districts
Type: Business Identification, Institutional, Temporary
(3) "SC" AND "NB" Districts
Type: Business Identification, Institutional, Temporary
(4) "GB" Districts
Type: Business Identification, Institutional, Temporary
(D) General provisions
(2) Signs Allowed by Special Use Permit
( i )
~~
1. The sign is located ten (10') feet from any
property line.
~)
~)
Page Two
Ordinance No. 8 Amendments
Sections 3.02 and 8.07
November 5, 1991
2.
The aggre~ate sGuare footage of sign space shall
not excee one undred (100 s.f.) square feet.
The sign shall be of the following styles:
combination, free standing, pedestal, roof or
wall.
. 3.
4.
No more than one sign shall be allowed ler lot
frontage unless approved by City Counci .
The sign shall be located at least one hundred
thirty (130') feet from any residential
structure.
5.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day
of , 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
~)
Planning and Zoning CommIssion Meeting
Minutes - October 8, 1991
Page 2
(Public Hearing: Lot Split - N. Stout, 1919 167th Avenue, Continued)
MOTION by Jovanovich, Seconded by Apel, recommending approval of the
lot split request by Norman Stout located at 1909 167th Avenue NW to
split a ten-acre parcel into a six-acre parcel and a four-acre parcel
in an R-1, Single Family Rural District. It meets all the ordinances:
and add that the applicant shall have the lots surveyed as required
and pay a park dedicatIon fee of $400 upon CIty CouncIl approval of
the proposed lot spIlt: and that the lot spIlt request shall be
subject to a one-year sunset clause. There was a publIc hearIng and
there were no objections. Motion carried on a 5-Yes, 1-Absent
(McMullen) vote.
This item is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on November 5,
1991. 7:43 p.m.
~ PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO.8. SECTION 8.07. SIGNS
7:43 p.m. Mr. Carlberg explained this item was directed to the
Planning Commission to review whether the ordinance should be amended
to allow larger signage for churchs, institutional and public
buildings in the residential district. The issue was brought up when
the signage for Fire Station #2 was proposed to be 85.17 square feet.
After reviewing the ordinance, the Staff felt that rather than
amending the ordinance, the variance procedure would be more
appropriate because zoning is the hardship characteristic of the land.
Mr. Carlberg continued that if it is determined that larger church,
institutional and municipal signs will be allowed in the residential
area as a permitted use, the Staff is suggesting it be done by Special
Use Permit. The question is also Just what size should be allowed and
how many signs should be permitted.
The Commission discussed the issue. Commissioner Apel liked the
variance process. The instances are sporatic, and he felt there has
not been enough evidence suggesting there is a problem. He would have
preferred a firm direction from the Council. Mr. Carlberg stated the
ordinance is restrictive, and the Council suggested it be made more
flexible.
Chairperson Peek questioned the variance procedure as being totally
arbitrary. He asked if a Special Use Permit for a sign could be heard
in conjunctIon with the SUP for the use. Mr. Carlberg felt that could
be done, although often the applIcant does not have final plans done
at the time the use is asked for. CommissIoner Pease felt one of the
reasons the ordinance is restrictive Is to protect the residential
area such as In the case where a house is converted to a church.
,~
The hearing was opened for public testimony. There being none,
Chairperson Peek asked for a motion to close the public hearing.
~-)
PlannIng and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes - October 8, 1991
Page 3
(Public HearIng: Amendment/OrdInance 8, Sec. 8.07, SIgns, ContInued)
MOTION by Pease, Seconded by Dehn, to so move. MotIon carrIed on a
6-Yes. 1-Absent (McMullen) vote.
MOTION by Apel, Seconded by Dehn, that the PlannIng and ZonIng
CommIssIon recommend to the CIty Council that no changes be made to
OrdInance No.8 regardIng the regulatIons of the sIgnage In the
residentIal area. The CommIssIon Is concerned about the Impact on
resIdential areas wIth increasing signage size.
Motion carried on a 6-Yes, 1-Absent (McMullen) vote. The item is
scheduled to be on the November 5. 1991, City Council Agenda.
8:09 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO.8. SECTION 7.01. RURAL AGRICULTURAL
USES ON PARCELS OF FIVE ACRES OR MORE IN R-2 AND R-3 OUTSIDE MUSA
8:09 p.m. Mr. Carlberg reviewed the proposed amendment to allow Rural
AgrIcultural Uses in the R-2 and R-3 dIstrIcts outsIde the
Metropolitan Urban Service Area on parcels of fIve acres or more.
Currently, those practices are only allowed within R-1 Districts.
LeasIng or owning contiguous parcels allows the same uses as owning
the property.
The hearing was opened for public testimony.
Barb Dehn. 17245 Mavaio - gave a scenerio that under the amendment,
200 anImals would be allowed on four contIguous 5-acre parcels with a
barn on one of the lots, all in close proximity wIth a residential
neighborhood. She expressed concern about the densIty of anImals and
the odor of so many animals In a confined area which is adjacent to a
resIdential area. Ms. Dehn related an incident of not gettIng
satIsfactIon from the CIty In taking care of a pile of dead animals,
that the State finally intervened. She did not want such incidents to
happen again. She was concerned about the potential of beIng
surrounding by many anImals and the problems that can be created,
expressIng skeptIcism over having such problems easily resolved by the
CIty. Ms. Dehn suggested the number of animals per acre be reduced
and lImIt the number of contIguous acres.
The CommissIon explaIned that the CIty has an oblIgation to see that
the animals are treated humanely and that any odor or noise problem
can be addressed through the Nuisance Ordinance. They explained the
procedure for fIling a complaInt and noted the ResIdent Forum at the
. -\ beginnIng of each CouncIl meeting where the Issue can be brought up if
\~ there Is no satIsfaction through Staff. The Commission also noted the
amendment simply equates parcels of five acres or greater in the R-2
and R-3 areas outside of the MUSA wIth those In the R-1 district
relatIve to Rural AgrIcultural Uses. The ordInances do cover the
number of animals and prohIbit feedlots.
~-)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST F,ORPLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
october 8, 1991
DATE
AGENDA_)TEM
7. Public Hearing
k Amend Ord. No.8
Sec. 8.07
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
David L. carlberg
City planner
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review and
discuss the proposed amendment to Ordinance No.8, the zoning
Ordinance, Section 8.07, Signs.
SECTION 8.07 BACKGROUND
On September 3, 1991, the City Council referred this item to Staff
and ultimately to the Planning and zoning Commission to review
Ordinance No.8, Section 8.07 and propose changes to the zoning
Ordinance that would allow churches, institutional and public
buildings to have additional signage than currently regulated.
This was brought to the attention of the Council by Bob Peach,
Bond Coordinator for the Fire Department at the September 3, 1991
City Council meeting during Residents Forum.
Currently, the City allows the following signs as permitted signs
in Residential Districts.
Type:
Style:
Residential Identification, Temporary.
Combination, Free-Standing, Pedestal, Wall.
Size:
One (1) per lot front.
No more than four (4 s.f.) square feet per
dwelling;
Thirty-two (32 s.f.) square feet for non-
.residential signs offering a residential
development for sale;
Number:
Height:
Six (6 s.f.) square feet for real estate signs
offering individual properties either land and/or
buildings, for sale, lease or rent;
Not over ten (10') feet above grade except as
provided otherwise herein.
, )
--..../
projection:
Any sign over four (4 s.f.) square feet shall be
set back at least ten (10') feet from any lot line.
Illumination: Indirect or diffused lighting of signs permitted,
subiect to illumination controls.
,-~
page Two
Amend. Ord. No.8, Sec. 8.07
planning and zoning Commision Meeting
October 8, 1991
The City allows by Special Use Permit, Area Identification Signs,
provided:
1. The area for development is larger than five (5 a.)
acres;
2. There shall be only one (1) sign per development;
3. The maximum square footage of the sign is thirty-two (32
s.f.) square feet in area;
4. The sign is located ten (10') feet from any property
line.
Signage for uses and buildings such as churches, institutional and
municipal are currently handled under this section (Section
8.07(D)(2)).
The Commission will need to address the following questions:
1. Does Section 8.07 need to be amended to allow greater signage
for churches, institutional and municipal use or buildings,
and if so should they be allowed as a permitted use or a
special use?
2. If the above signs are allowed as a permitted use or a special
use, what restrictions should apply in regard to type, size,
style, height, projection and illumination.
Commission options
1. Recommend no changes to Ordinance No.8, Section 8.07 to the
City Council.
2. Recommend to the City Council that church, institutional and
municipal signs be allowed as a permitted use.
3. Recommend to the City Council that church, institutional and
municipal signs be allowed as a special use.
Note: Options two and three will also require minimum
requirements in regard to type, size, etc.
To address the specific requirements of these types of signs, the
Commission may want to use the sign requirements in Limited
Business Districts and modify them to be more restrictive. For
example, change size of sign to limit no single sign in excess of
two hundred (200 s.f.) square feet to one hundred (100 s.f) square
feet for the above stated uses. Attached for Commission review is
\ the permitted signs in Limited Business Districts.
)
. '\
-.j
'\
.~)
Ordinance No.8, Section
setback, nor within five (5') feet of the rear lot line
or street right-of-way line.
Multi-faced signs may be permitted, with the maximum
square footage on each side. Multi-faced signs shall
not exceed two (2) times the area of single-faced signs.
Signs on vacant lots shall be permitted in accordance
with these regulations.
All corner and through lots shall be considered as
having two (2) front lot lines for application of
regulations pertaining to signs.
(C) Permitted Signs
Signs shall be permitted by zoning district in accordance
with the following minimum standards:
(1) Residential Districts
Type: Residential Identification, Temporary
Style: Combination, Free-standing, Pedestal, Wall
Number: One (1) per lot frontage
Size: No more than four (4 s.f.) square feet per
dwelling;
Thirty-two (32 s.f.) square feet for non-
residential signs offering a residential
development for sale;
Six (6 s.f.) square feet for real estate
signs offering individual properties
either land and/or buildings, for sale,
lease or rent;
Height: Not over ten (10') feet above grade except
as otherwise provided herein;
Projection: Any sign over four (4 s.f.) square feet
shall be set back at least ten (10') feet
from any lot line;
Illumination: Indirect or diffused lighting of signs
permitted, subject to lumination controls.
(2 )
~~Gli~and "LB" Districts
~"..,
Type: Business Identification, Temporary
Style: Combination, Free-Standing, Pedestal,
Roof, wall
Height: No more than two (2') feet above the
highest outside wall of building, or
twenty-five (25') feet, whichever is less;
Page 65
Ordinance No~8~section
Size: The aggregate square footage of sign space
per lot shall not exceed the sum of two (2
s.f.) square feet per front foot of
building;
\
~)
No single sign shall exceed two hundred
(200 s.f.) square feet;
No individual business signs shall be so
'arranged as to create an integrated sign
having over two hundred (200 s.f.) square
feet;
projection: Signs may project two (2') feet into the
required yard area;
Illumination: Illuminated but non-flashing signs
permitted.
(3) "SC" and "NB" Districts
Type: Business Identification, Temporary
Style: Combination, Free-standing, Pedestal,
Roof, Wall
Size: The aggregate square footage of sign space
per lot shall not exceed the sum of three
(3 s.f.) square feet per front foot of
building;
No single sign shall exceed one hundred
(100 s.f.) square feet except nameplate
(Business Identification) signs, which
shall not exceed three hundred (300 s.f.)
square feet;
Height: Not over six (6') feet above the highest
outside wall or parapet or twenty-five
(25') feet, whichever is less;
projection: Signs may project two (2') feet into the
required yard, except a nameplate sign may
be located in any yard area but not within
ten (10') feet of any street right-of-way
line or within five (5') feet of any other
lot line;
Illumination: Illuminated and flashing signs permitted.
(4) nGB~.pistricts
Type: Advertising, Business Identification,
Temporary
Style: Combination, Free-standing, Pedestal,
Roof, Wall
. \
,
"--/
Page 66
"-
,~
f~r"'-""-"'~""'>'"
/f .'t!.i
,t~r'l
\ JI
\ ~
" , -
~~~~#-...
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE NoveIabe-,- 5. ~ qq:
R
AGENDA SECllON ..
NQ Sta f, Comm.Commlsslon
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
ITEM
NO.
/-S.
Water Hookup/public
Works Bldg.
BY:
James E. Schrantz
The city Council requested that we look at the
to city water.
We recommend that we install a 10 HP pump motor and pump plus an
air release setup plus bail the well.
We think that we should use the existing well for sprinkling the
ball fields .
We recommend that we hook up Public Works to the city water
system when we construct Well #4 that is proposed to be located
between the tower and Public Works.
We estimate the cost to connect to city water is $5,000 to $7,000
depending on if we just provide domestic service or supply enough
water to fill fire trucks.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
~)TO
SECOND BY
,--)
':'~/("'''''~'''''''''''''\
'" ,~
,',~' "~
;(t;~
'\\ .,)
,.. 4"
-~'~~....jIjIii'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE November
BY:
AGENDA SEC.JLON .
NQ Staff, Comm1ttee, Comm
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Administration
ITEM Review Fi re Bond
NO. d'
It. Coor 1nator Contract
BY:
v. Volk ~,b.
The City Council is requested to review the contract with
Associates, Inc. for the coordination of the Fire Bond.
The contract was approved on May 21, 1991 subject to review by
the City Council.
Attached is a copy of the contract.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
~)TO
SECOND BY
CONTRACT AGREEMENT
,~)
This contract agreement between PEACH ASSOCIATES. INC.. 15830
University Avenue NW. Andover. MN. and the CITY OF ANDOVER. 1685
Crosstown Boulevard NW. Andover, MN, shal I be effective beginning
Tuesday. May 21. 1991, through December 31. 1991. and may be
terminated by written notice within 14 days by either party.
The contract agreement includes the following:
1. Peach Associates. Inc., agrees to serve as the Bond
Coordinator for the $2.500.000 Fire Department Bond Issue
and will provide the City of Andover with the following:
a) Establish a budget for the $2.5 million Fire
Department Bond Issue
b) Present an itemized budget for Council approval
c) Assist Fire Department Committees in the preparation of
specifications for equipment. etc.
d) Interview vendors
e) Coordinate change orders
f) Verify compliance of deliveries. storage, payments
g) Interface building, trucks. equipment with the
Fire Department and City Staff
h) Provide periodic updates and reports to the Council.
Fire Department and City Staff
i) Manage expenses within the parameters established by
the Finance Director
J) Provide a one-person contact for all questions relating
to the bond
k) Provide secretarial and office services, fax, computer,
phones. and travel and Incidental expenses for any
travel within 50 miles of Andover. Travel expenses
outside of the 50-mile radius and not covered by the
vendor is outside of this contract.
2. The City of Andover agrees to pay Peach Associates. Inc.. a
rate of $2.000 per month upon receipt of an itemized
statement of services.
PEACH ASSOCIATES. INC.
~) tP~.d2-
Robert T. Peach, President
~
i1~ [d
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
DATE:
s-=- 2.2.. -q r
o
i;-":,,~/""':CA~","":~"",,,,\
fl ,:p
\ j
":"" __ ....4"iY
~""I!,ji."j;-'!i'"
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
November 5
AGENDA -SEClLON .
NO. Sta f, Comm~ttee, Comm
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
17.
Hepatitis B Vaccine/
Fire & Rescue
Fire Department,
{I C
Glenn Smith
BY:
J
The City Council is requested to review the attached bids for the
Hepatitis B Vaccinations for Fire & Rescue personnel. The Fire
Department recommends the Bloomington Public Health Department
as they are the least expensive.
Also attached is a consent/refusal form that the City Attorney is
asked to review.
We would like to pursue this yet this year if funding is
available.
MOTION BY
'- TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
AND0VER flPE I RESCUE
SEPTEMBER 18,1991
AGENCYS PROVIDING HEPATITIS B VACCINE
,.]
COLUMnlA PARK MEDICAL GROUP- fRIDLEY PLAZA CLINIC
_._'------ -
CONTACT PERSON: SHARON ELLIS R.N. , OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH COORDINATOR
57 1 - 0 " 5 7
IMMUNIZATIONS TO BE GIVEN ON SITE (FIRE STATION)
IF WE PROVIDE AND STORE SERUM - $108. / PER PERSON
IF THEY PROVIDE AND STORE SERUM- 188./ PER PERSON
EAST MAIN CLINIC-ANOKA
CONTACT PERSON: JUDY WALSH, R.N., NURSING DIRECTOR. ~27-0757
TO BE GIVE~ AT CLINIC - $210/PERSON
COON RAPIDS MEDICAL CENTER-COON RAPIDS
CONTACT PERSON: JAN JENSON R.N., DEPT. OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE
730-7083
TO BE GIVEN AT CLINIC - $219./PFRSON
FOLLOW-UP HEPATITIS B IMMUNITY DETERMINATION OFFERED AFTER LAST
VACCINATION FOR ADDITIONAL &20./PERSON
N0 R THWO RK S -N0 R TH MEMO R I ,\L HOS P! T.^.L
CONTACT:OCClJPATIONAL HEALTH DEPT. 520-5551
TO BE GIVEN ON SITE - $165-$180./PERSON
B LOQM! NG r0l~ FUB LI CHEAL TIi DE PAR TMENT
CON1ACT PERSON: KARl DUSICH 887-9603
Tn BE GIVEN ON SITE - $140/PERSON
W0ULD PREFER THAT WE GET TOGETHER WITH OTHER FIRE DErTS. OR
ORGAtJIZATIONS DESIRING THE VACCINATIONS TO INCREASE THE NUMBERS
AS TIfEY ARF: USED TO DOIN(; THIS FOR MUCH LARGER Gr~OUPS.
"-
~
TIfESE PROPOSALS ARE SUBJECT TO FEE CHANGES IF NOT GIVEN ^,T THIS Tn~F:.
'-)
')
'-/
ANDOVER FIRE & RESCUE
HEPATITIS B CONSENT/REFUSAL FORM
I have read the attached statement about hepatitis B vaccine. I have had an
opportunity to ask questions and understand the benefits and risks of the
vaccination. I accept those risks. I understand that if I consent to the
vaccination I must have 3 doses of vaccine to confer immunity. I realize
that 100% ,fmmunity is not guaranteed. I understand that it is my respons-
ibility to receive the doses according to the schedule. I further understand
that the vaccine has been offered to me at no cost. For myself and my heirs,
successors and assigns I hereby knowingly and willingly release the City of
Andover from any and all liability for any claim I may have, now or in the
future, as a result of my decision to accept or refuse this vaccination.
I request that the vaccine be given to me at this time.
I DO DO NOT have an allergy to yeast.
Signature of Person Accepting Vaccination
Date
I prefer not to receive the Hepatitis-B
to be vaccinated. I do understand that
in the future at my request.
vaccine and decline the opportunity
I may receive the vaccination series
Signature of Person Refusing Vaccination
Date
I have already received Hepatitis B vaccination. Date of last injection.
Signaturp Date
l
'-../
'\
,
--/
Comprehensive Medical Care
Ch!mplln Medical Center
11269 Jefferson Highway
Champlin. MN 55316
M!ple Grow Medlc!1 Center
1m Maple Knoll Way
Maple Grove. MN 55369
Rarm:e'l Mt:dical Cenl!r
53X) - 153rd Avenue
Ramsey, MN 55303
St Mlch!el Medical Center
703 Thielen Drive
Sl. Michael, MN 55376
Coon Rapids Medical Center
0055 Spring brook Drive
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
(612) 780-9155
September 10, 1991
Cheryl Keller
14330 Osage Street
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Ms. Keller;
As you may be aware, new occupational safety and hei't.lth regulations
from the Minnesota Occupational Safety and Health Division PoI icy
Committee mandate that employers whose employees have exposure to
blood-borne diseases be offered the three-shot Hepatitis B vaccine
at employer expense. Employees in this category include nurses and
other health care workers, dentists and dental workers, laboratory
and blood bank technologists and technicians, morticians, housekeepers,
laundry workers, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, law enforce-
ment personnel, fire fighters, lifeguards, correctional officers,
and any others whose jobs might require first response medical care
or potential contact with blood or other body fluids.
The Department of Occupational Medicine, Coon Rapids Medical Center,
is able to offer the three-shot Hepatitis B Recombivax vaccine at
$219 per employee. This is given over a six month period. We also
recommend a tallow-up Hepatitis B immunity determination at three
r.~nths after the last vaccination, and this is offered at $20.
Unfortunately the cost of this government mandated vaccination program
is not a covered benefit for the vast majority of insurance plans,
inCluding the MedCenter Health Plan. Like other employers who have
employees at risk for bl00d-borne diseases, our group also has been
required to bear this expense.
If you have any questions related to the new Occupational Safety
and Health Administration regulations, or would like a copy of these
regulations, please contact Jan Jensen at 780-7083. Sh~ is well
versed in the appropriate OSHA regulations and would be happy to
set up an appropriate vaccination policy for your employees who may
be at risk.
lSince::~, (j o!, ,fj' '-ri/)'u/Y)ll ~
es A. Lee, M.D., M. ., {!rector:
partment of Occupati nal M~dicine
JAL/lbs
Columbia Park Medical Group
,)
September 10, 1991
Ms. Cheryl Keller
Andover Fire Department
14330 Osage Street
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Cheryl:
Thank you for contacting Columbia Park Medical Group- Fridley Plaza Clinic for
hepatitis injections for the Andover Fire Department. It is my understanding
that your desire is for us to provide the immunization at the fire department.
You will purchase and store the serum for the injections.
Attached is a proposal for the immunization program. if you h.ave any questions
or concerns, please contact me at 571-0457. We would appreciate at !cast a two
week notice to schedule the date for the immunizations. This proposal is subjc..:t
to fee changes if not implemented within 60 days.
Sincerely,
-71-' ('
'\ " /,:."
'-_____ _ / '-"_~__'~--'<"/ (JOt' ,(--'___-<'~
Sharon Ellis, R.N.
Occupational Health Coordinator
cc: M. K. Zagaria
"
~ -~/
.'J
COLUMBIA PARK MEDICAL GROUP
HEPATITIS B IMMUNIZATION PROGRAM FOR ANDOVER FIRE DEPARTMENT
I. TOTAL PROGRAM COST:.............................................$ 480.00
II. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS:
Program delivered three times (3) on-site to a maximum of 30
employees.
Andover Fire Department will pre-schedule employees for immunization
and notify CPMG of final total participant count one week prior to
implementing first series of i~jcctiGn5. Maximum of thirty employees
per hour.
Andover Fire Department will order, provide and store serum for total
immunization program (series of three individual injections over six
month interval.) Prior to each series, Fridley Plaza Clinic's
occupational health coordinator will receive a letter verifying where
the serum was purchased, the manufacturer's lot number and the
expiration date.
III. LA60R:...................... ........................._.... ...$ 270.00
INCLUDES: Two nurses, two hours each for on site immunization, travel
and set-up time.
IV. SUPPLIES, ADMINISTRATION AND RECORDKEEPING.....................$ 210.00
1!'.fCL!JDES: Hep::.ti~i:; 2 L-n!!:t:~h:~ti0ri ~:9fvrrd..:~h:.:1 ~t~~ty w:::;;,,~n~ fG'~~.
and immunization record. (Andover re<.:eives and retains origimd
immunization record from CPMG; CPMG retains a copy.)
NOTE:
-- If an employee is unable to participate in any of the on site
immunization series, they may schedule an appointment at the fridley
plaza clinic occupational department. Each employee will bring the
Immunization serum to the clinic. For each injection, a $ 10.50 fee
will be charged.
~
. , ,'---.L~/' 1t9), co /I.JlA....(?J,~-T\.. /~-C(y>
~.A/ ..._-_~--L~'. I,F v - J t
~-',,~- c;.,-::>~--'!..-<-~J<.--"" ,/
.3 ~, . -== j) /01; / (J'Uu.1-Cr'--
C r2 t: -ell G-/Lrk~q~ 'f- .o-~ pP_/U. '---"'" C -c:--d i..-::> 7/1 '1 <<:re.A<"'~-A_
IN~ORMATION ABOUT HEPATITIS B VACCINE
'J
THE VACCINE
Hepatitis B vaccine (Recombivax or Engerix B) is derived from hepatitis surface
antigen produced in yeast cells. It is free of assocication with human blood or
blood products. A high percentage of healthy people who receive two doses of
vaccine and a booster acheive high levels of surface antibody (anti-DBs) and
protection against hepatitis B. Persons with immune-system abnormalities, SUCll
as dialysis patients, have less response to the vaccine, but over half of those
receiving it do develop antibodies. Full immunization requires 3 doses of
vaccine over a six month period, although some persons may not develop immunity
even after 3 doses. There is no evidence that the vaccine has ever caused hep-
atitis B. However, persons who have been infected with HBV prior to receiving
the vaccine may go on to develop clinical hepatitis in spite of immunization.
The duration of immunity is unknown at this time, but is probably about 7 years.
POSSIBLE VACCINE SIDE EFFECTS
The incidence of side effects is very low. No serious side effects have been
reported with the vaccine. The most common side effect is soreness at the site
of injection. Low grade fever may occur. Rash, nausea, joint pain and mild
fatigue have also been reported. The possibility exists that more serious side
effects may be identified with more extensive use. Giving hepatitis B vaccine to
persons who are already immune or carriers will not increase the risk of side effects.
PREGNANCY
No information is available about the ~~fcty of the vaccine for unborn babies;
however, because the vaccine contains only particles that do not ~vu~e hepatitis B
infection, there should be no risk. In contrast, if a p~egnant woman gets a hep-
atitis B infection, this may cause severe disease in the mother and chronic in-
fection in the newborn baby. Therefore, pregnant women who are otherwise eligible
can be given hepatitis B vaccine.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT HEPATITIS B OR THE HEPATITIS B VACCINE, PLEASE ASK.
.,~
c,~~""".~"""""
c "~
,i' 1:\.
l, ~
~: "~
~ ~
(';j ~,1
, l .,,'
,) '. .1
'~'').~'" ,~#~7
~.~~'c'"
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
November 5, 1991
BY:
James E. Schrantz
APP'B VE I> '\j:OR
AGE.. A i"-
'~~
'\.
BY:
J
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Staff, Committee, Comm
ITEM Water Problems/
NO'1
/8. Discussion
Admin.
The City Council is requested
drainage concerns. We have a
existed for a number of years
them.
I
to consider the following s orm
few water problems that h e
and we have been unable to correct
1. Wally Klabunde's pond located at the end of 163rd Lane.
When we paved the streets in that area we diverted as much
water as possible and also when we constructed 162nd Avenue
in the industrial park we provided a ponding area at the end
of 162nd Avenue.
This year the water was high due to the above average rainfall
causing them concern for their septic system.
When the buildings were constructed in the industrial park the
large amount of impervious area caused a great deal of water
to drain to Klabunde's pond.
The pond does not have an outlet. To provide an outlet is not
very feasable as a solution.
I propose trying to clean the bottom of the Klabunde pond and
clean and/or improve the pond that is in the industrial park
adjacent to Klabunde's pond. I have talked to the owner of
the property in the industrial park and he said he will
cooperate with the City.
Funding: This is were we have another problem. Only one
property owner has a problem and I do not think it will be
easy to do a storm drain improvement project.
There is a storm drain pond on the south side of 162nd Avenue
that we hoped we could sell some dirt out of it for the 168th
Avenue project but that did not work out.
COUNCIL ACTION
\
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
~-)
We need $5,000 or $6,000 to excavate the Klabunde pond and the
adjacent industrial park low area.
Should it be funded from the PIR Fund?
2. Rose Street cul-de-sac at the City limits with Coon Rapids.
(13317 Rose Street)
When Coon Rapids platted south of Woodland Terrace they filled
a low area where the water south of Rose Street cul-de-sac
drained. Coon Rapids allowed this area to be filled and
graded their plat so only the Coon Rapids water would run to
the Coon Rapids storm drain.
The home at 13317 Rose Street was constructed below the
approved grading plan elevation. The grading plan elevation
is 878. The surveyor staked the property and proposed a
lowest flow of 876 and the builder constructed the home at
874.5 about 1/2 foot above the backyard which can not drain
out of Andover now.
It seems that the builder/developers are trying to build full
walkouts when there is not enough difference in grade between
the street and the rear yard. They are doing it without
concern for the drainage. They look great when the weather
is dry.
We are working with Coon Rapids to try to construct a storm
sewer that Coon Rapids indicated they were going to construct
but Jim Stanton evidently changed their plans. We are told
that Stanton offered to construct the storm sewer if someone
would pay for it, but we do not know who the offer was made
to. The offer was not made to the Andover staff.
We propose to construct a 10" PVC storm drain pipe from a
catch base in Coon Rapids to the problem area.
Funding: We hope the developer, the builder, the property
owner and the cities can get the problem solved. possibly the
city crews could construct the storm sewer. We could do a 429
project and assess.
3. Poppy Street Cul-de-sac
This is another lot on the border between Coon
Andover just west of the Rose Street problem.
to flow into Coon Rapids.
Rapids and
The water needs
,~
This problem can be improved by cutting off the back of the
curb in one of Rotlands streets and regrading behind the curb.
Funding: Cutting the curb and regrading will cost a few
hundred dollars. I do not have a good source other than city
crews doing the work and/or assessing the cost to the
benefiting area.
4. Enchanted Drive
When a couple of the houses were built the builder filled the
ditch in front of the houses and covered up the end of the
culvert under the street.
:,)
The storm pipe from the street to the pond was never
constructed. This problem has been around for a long time.
Funding: I do not know unless we have the city crew construct
it or assess the cost under a 429 procedure.
5. Russell's bottom land along the Rum River and north of 165th
Avenue extended.
In 1985 parts of the Russell-stack Addition was being flooded
so the city's Public Works Department constructed a storm
drainage system that ends up in the bottom lands.
At that time Mr. Russell was leasing the land to Ed Fields for
planting of radishes. The City signed an agreement with the
Russells (see attached) indicating the City would pay
$1,000 for crop damage.
In 1991 the land is not farmed as in the past. Mr. Russell
has planted trees under a program under the U.s. Fish and
Wildlife called the "Conservation Reserve Program" (CRP).
(See letter attached.)
The area being flooded in 1991 is about the same area that was
flooded and not cropped in 1985-86 when we constructed the
project. The flooded area goes up the middle of the bottom
land making it more difficult to farm.
Question: Was there crop damage and to what extent?
Should the City or someone construct a berm across the end of
the field next to the storm drain outlet to divert the water
around the edge of the field where there is a ditch that is
growing over and blocking the flow of water on its way to the
Rum River?
Mr. Russell was the developer of the subdivision that the
storm sewer serves.
Should we clean the ditch around the edge of the bottom land
and assess all the properties that drain to this storm sewer
and/or bottom land.
If Council remembers that the area that this storm sewer
serves comes from the wetland north of the Russell property.
Remember that a old earth dike broke loose during this time
and flooded the whole area to say the least. We pumped for
weeks and then built the storm drainage. The storm sewer is
working beautifully.
Storm Sewer utilities
~~
Maybe we should start thinking about a storm sewer utility so
we would have funds to solve some of these errors and
ommissions that happen during the development phase of a City
and would continue to have funds for the mature phase when the
storm sewer needs to be replaced and maintained.
'. liarm ,10. 28.M-QUlT CLAIM DEED
"-ihdividuall,'lo Co'-poration
0' Partnership
Mlnnuota UnHorm Con\l..vttH::ln~ lillnU (I ~ It'l)
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
nf Real Estate Value (. ) filed ( ) not required
\rtificate of Real Estate Value No.
-./ 19
.
County Auditor
by
Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON:
trt~"L /6
$ EXEMPT
Date:
, 19 ...a5.-
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION. Clyde A. Russell and Mary A. Russell.
husband and wife . Grantor (s),
lmarital status)
hereby convey (s) and quitclaim (s) to
The City of Andover
. Grantee,
under the laws of Minnesota
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
water drainage and ponding purposes over
the
a municipal corporation
real property in Anoka
A permanent easement for storm
following described parcels:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
In the event that all or a substantial portion of that property described as
Parcel B of Exhibit A attached hereto shall become inundated with storm water
as a result of drainage thereon by the City of Andover in the year 1987 or.
thereafter the City agrees to indemnify grantors from any losS or damage
that may be occasioned as the result of such flooding in the amount of
$1 000.00---- Furthermore, upon such event, the City agrees that i twi 11
undertake to install a storm water drainage system pursuant to Minnesotn
Statute 429, for the purpose of providing an alternative to the dischar.ge of
storm water on the Parcel B described herein. Such drainage plan may include
the ditching and/or piping of storm water drainage to the Rum River within
the easement described as Parcel A attached hereto. Upon completion of such
project the City will vacate all storm sewer easement rights it has over
Parcel B. (Continued on back) (if more.pace is neodod,continuoon backl
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto.
j) jJ, CJ~.._~-L~--;/
~~fa Wln sc It ,M~yor
a~~lt~\.P~~~ch, cler~('c-' --
CITY OF ANDOVER
. \ ffl.'. !.l..n, I I" '- ,-=f ;"111' : I,'r"
COUNTY OF
Anoka
} ss.
Q~ (t.~
Cly A. Russe
/,J-' ~ a.. rr~il~
1-1ary 1\. ssell L
I.u. ~_ ~
- '.::'- , _ _~ .A~>.J1/ 19 82_.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
- J .
, ,
- No. IOOSK-C.rtllc....." k I
r-- .--- ----- _____~~~_edrm.ent-By CorporatJoa
~tatt of M .. -.._~.. ~!!~!~.p..!!.I_~~.!..~i~DU.~Ii.. lUnD.
, ........ innes.Q:t-~..~.....:.....::~ - -------l'--H - - - .. . - - l
Ct1Unt I .............. u. ;; --;r::- 4 I
Y 0 .........Anoka -
................................................. On. thi6.......&... .. . da 0 1-- I
belore ~, a...............~.?.~.~.ry. Publ ic . . y /........12................ ................, 19.8,5....,
I ............Ge,r.ald....W.inQsch.i't'i............................................................wdhtn. and lor /laid County per/lonall a
._ _, . .. . .......................................,...................anll.......}1.(;l.r;c::,~U..CI......I.'~(;ls:.h.............. y ppeared
~)
l..Lv !.
'. )
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge
Route 2
Zimmerman. Minnesota 55398
JH .!.PLY urr... TO:
~ril 11, 1990
Dear CRP Participant:
We would like to help improve your land for wildlife at no oost to you.
under a new program, the u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service is restoring marshes
and wetlands on Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) land with all oosts paid for
by the service. Only wetlands that are nrotually agreed upon by the landowner
and the service will be restored. Landowners keep all rights to their lands
including the oontrol of htmtinq and trespassinq. Onlv drained wetlands are
elicrlble: i.e. those that are ditched, tiled, etc. We will not dig or deepen
marshes tmder our current Pl:~.LCWl.
Restored marshes provide excellent habitat for ducks, geese, pheasants, deer,
and many other animals. Wetlands also help grotmdwater recharge,' reduce
downstream flooding, and decrease soil erosion. They will be a valuable and
beautiful addition to your CRP acres.
If you have drained wetlands on your CRP acres, or would like to receive IOOre
infonnation, please fill out the bottan portion of this letter and mail it back
in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. We need to start planning our
oonstruction schedule as early as possible. only those requests received by
Jtme 15 can be oonsidered for 1990 wetland restoration.
JI II
Contact me at 612/389-3323 (oollect) if you have any questions or need IOOre
infonnation.
Sincerely,
/), , l~~ '
Ic::j;;.~/~I. cr=~A/~~
Richard Joarnt
Refuge Biologist
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes! I am interested in the pl:~.Ld1u. Please oontact me at:
Name: Clyde Russell
Address 16518 Roanoke Rd NW AndnVAr MN 55304- 1620
Telephone 612 421 5819 Best time to call
I own land in section.12
,) ..,.- -' .'
of R2;t;\ _....~ Township 12 MloKA
Cotmty
, '\
,_.J
(",,~~, "\
r T\ i
\"-7.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
DATE Huv~IlIu~[ ;)
Bob Peach !l-vi
Bond Coordi~tor
ITEM
NO.
19
Fire Bond Budget
Changes
BY:
The following changes are requested to the approved Fire Bond
budget:
*BuildinQ chanoe order #6
*5 Wall Seds (Station #1)
2 Kev Control Cab
1 Chlef Desk
4 Administration Desks
5 Desk Chairs
1 Credenza
3 Conference Tables
7 Drawers
1 Podium
*1 Computer System w/Software
1 Compressor 90psi
1 Console Radio
2 Station Maintenance (Janitorial)
2 Flag Poles
*Tanker 8
*Tanker 9
12 Pal Personal Alert Device
*1 Defibrillator
1 Air Quality Testor
New Amount
5840.86
6893.00
99.00
659.00
1688.00
1355.00
409.00
1565.00
1190.00
150.00
6093.00
1500.00
900.00
5000.00
1250.00
94271.00
91189.00
1140.00
6096.00
2000.00
Net Chanoe
+5840.86
-3107.00
+ 4.00
+ 59.00
+ 88.00
+ 505.00
+ 409.00
+1565.00
+1190.00
+ 150.00
+2093.00
+ 500.00
+ 900.00
+3000.00
+1250.00
+ 248.00
+ 2.00
+1140.00
+6096.00
+2000.00
* Items have additional information attached.
Adoption of these changes will not exceed bond expense
limItations (see attached updated budget).
A motion is needed to approve the proposed changes to the Fire
Bond Budget as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
-r :T1ON BY
OCTOBER 30 1991 N ORDERED REV
FIRE DEPT. 'BOND BUDGET o APPROVED SUB OR REVISED SUB
T BUDGET TOTAL SPENT BUDGET TOTAL
BUILDING COSTS E ---------------------------------------
BONESTROO CONTRACT 100100 68954 100100
TESTING.SOILS CONCRETE 2176 2176 2176
BONESTROO INSPECTIONS 24000 9556 24000
,) MAERTENS BRENNY 1037391 896504 1037391
LAND STATION#2 . 45500 46965 46965
LAND STATION#3 . 25000 COUNCIL 25000
SURVEY 2135 2135 2135
SAC/WAC ADMIN 26200 26200
OTHER,PERMIT,APPRAISAL,ADV 1404 1404 1404
CHANGE ORDER
LI NTEL 415 415 415
PHONE CONDUIT 569 569 569
HYDRANT 6850 6850 6850
BURNISHED BLOCK 21622 21622 21622
COMPACTION/STA#2 332 332 332
RAKE .JOINTS 1992 1992 1992
LOW E GLASS 649 649 649
PVC IN LIEU OF CAST PIPE -800 -800 -800
QUARRY TILE ON SIDEWALK 4246 4246 4246
QUARTZITE FLOORING 19033 19033 19033
CLOSET SHELVING ..,..,~ ..vv'\ ..,..,..,
..:....:..- ,.;;.,..::...:.. .:-..:....:..
ELECTRICAL OUTLETS 199 199 199
WOOD PANEL WAINSCOT 4393 4393 4393
MAGLOCK DOORS 2915 2915 2915
CONCI':ETE SLAB 436 436 436
CARPET BORDER 0 1399 1399
ADD OUTLETS T.V. 0 106 106
FLOOR OUTLET 0 184 184
ADD TRUCK FILLS 0 1173 1173
RED LI GHTS 0 1173 1173
ADD WASH FAUCETS 0 1585 1585
COMPRESSOR ELECTRIC STA ..., 0 312 312
"-
TELEPHONE DOOR OUTLET 0 689 689
STAIRI~AY PLATE 1 0 195
STA 2 SOD GRADING 1 0 670
TOUCH BAR 1 0 681
NUMBERS ADDRESS 1 0 576
WATER+GAS WASHER DRIER STA 2 1 0 310
TRUCK FILL ADD STA 2 1 0 904
SHOWER FIXTURE 1 0 24~j
ELECTRIC HOOD 1 0 140
STA 1 SOD DITCH 1 0 2120
SUB TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS 63073 75535
TOTAL BUILDING COSTS 1326979 1340906
BOND COSTS
ALDRICH STUDY 4850 4850 4850
BONNESTROO REPORT 1755 1755 1755
PRE-ELECTION COSTS 2800 2801 2801
BOND COORDINATOR 14710 8185 14710
BOND DISCOUNT 25000 25000 25000
BOND INTEREST TO CITY 14602 9576 10000
BOND SALE 15000 14398 15000
LEGAL COSTS
BOUNDARY SURVEY STATION 1 1000 1000 1000
LAND ACQUISITION STATION 2 4621 4115 4115
BOND CONSULTING 12000 11085 12000
OTHER 1200 0 1200
TOTAL BOND & lEGAL 97538 92431
FURN ITURE
., WAll BEDS 1 10000 COUNCIL 6893
..J
8 BED LI NNEN 800 800
5 RECL! NER 2000 2000
1 SOFA 600 600
3 END TABLES 300 300
4 BAR STOOLS 360 360
6 TRASH 30GAL 120 120
24 TRASH 10GAl 720 0:"- 720
..J~'
47 WINDOW BLI NDS 3000 2478 2633
1 MOVIE SCREEN 450 450
75 STACK CHAIRS 12150 4208 4208
~ ...,0: TRAPEZOID TABLES 2500 1246 1246
"::"--1
1 VIDEO CABINET 300 300
4 MARKER BOARD 2X3 120 120
1 CORK BOARD 4X8 130 130
1 CORK BOARD 4X6 85 85
4 CORK BOARD 2X3 120 120
3 HANGAR WAll RACK 90 90
100 HANGAR . METAL 135 135
10 RUGS,3X5 200 200
.., KEY CONTROL CABINET 1 95 99 99
'"
1 CHIEF DESK 1 600 659 659
4 ADMIN DESK 1 1600 1688 1688
5 DESK CHAIR 1 850 1355 1355
5 FILING CABINET 875 861 861
10 STORAGE CABINET 24X36X72 1900 4 635 1900
6 DOUBLE TIER LOCKER 250 250
,,) 1 CREDENZA 1 409 409
3 CONFERENCE TABLE 1 1565 1565
7 DRAWERS 1 1190 1190
1 PODIUM 1 0 150
TOTAL FURNITURE 40350 31636
APPLIANCES
1 T.V. 3211 2300 1499 1499
2 T.V. 26" 760 1012 1012
3 V.C.R 700 759 759
1 RCA 415 CAMCORDER 900 840 840
2 VACUUM COMMERCIAL 1000 1000
2 WASHING MACHINE COMMERCIAL 1200 764 764
2 DRIER COMMERCIAL 1200 574 574
2 R.O. WATER PURIFIER 1500 1500
1 COFFEE MAKER BUNN LG 300 300
1 COFFEE MAKER BUNN SMALL 100 100
1 COPIER 1200 1200
2 REFER/FREEZER 2100 1122 1122
2 RANGE/OVEN 1400 1341 1341
1 MICROWAVE 300 318 318
1 DISHWASHER 0 281 281
SHIPPING 0 50 1000
MISC. TABLE S< KITCHEN 1500 1500
TOTAL APPLIANCES 16460 15110
STATION EQUIP
1 COMPUTER SYSTEM 1 4000 COUNCIL 6093
2 COMPRESSOR 5000PSI 20000 BID 19167 19667
'"' CASCADE SYS 6676 3213 3213
'"
2 IRRIGATION LAWN SYS. 8700 8700 8700
3 HEALTH EXERCISE EQUIP 7500 6400 6500
cc TURNOUT RACKS 7000 5337 5437
...1....1
'"'c STORAGE SHELVING 2500 2500
~._I
2 COMPRESSOR 90PSI 1 1000 1425 1500
2 RADIO BASE STATION 6904 6650 6650
RADIO LICENSING 861 861
CONSOLE RADIO 1 900
2 INSTALL RADIO EQUIP 5000 11087
2 TELEPHONE SYSTEM 10000 7711 7711
1 FACSIMILE MACHINE 1400 1400
2 STATION MAINTENANCE 1 2000 3215 5000
2 FLAG POLE 1 0 1250
.., WINCH,HOSE TOWER 2000 443 800
"-
TOTAL STATION EQUIP 84680 89269
TRUCKS
1 E2 PUMPER #E6580 201575 206712 206712
1 L5 AERIAL #E6581 324994 328641 328641
1 T8 TANKER #1489 1 94023 48650 94271
1 T9 TANKER #1488 1 91187 90264 91189
2 G2 G3 GRASS #SK521 #SK522 67382 64480 64882
BID ADMIN COSTS 916 461 461
'"' GENERATOR SETS 9600 9600 9600
'"
1 LETTERING 966 966
TOTAL TRUCKS 789677 796722
EQUIPMENT
2 RADIO E2.L5 5350 5458 5458
3 RADIO G2.G3.T8 5535 5175 5175
'"' PORTABLE RADIO 1828 1828 1828
'"
3 CLASS A FOAM PUMP 10000 10000
15 PAGERS 8160 7785 7785
20 DRAEGER AIR PACI(S 4.51( 43300 43314 43314
15 TURNOUT GEAR 0 8171 8171
.., ELECTRIC VENT 20" 1900 1368 1370
"-
'"' DRYWALL HOOK 6" D HANDLE MTG. 95 175 175
'"
2 PIKE POLE 6' FBRGLS MTG. 158 125 125
'"' PIKE POLE 8'FBRGLS MTG. 186 150 150
'"
3 ATTIC LADDER 8' 450 350 350
4 2 SPANNER WRENCH MTG. 200 156 156
6 2 SPANNER & HYDRANT MTG. 480 294 294
,~ 4 4 STORZ WRENCH MTG. 280 250 250
4 15# C02 EXTINGUISHER MTG. 500 500 500
4 20# ABC EXTINGUISHER MTG. 280 276 276
2 2.5G PRESS WATER EXT MTG. 300 116 116
2 LAMP .120V 50' CORD 10/3wG RUBR 180 125 125
2 100' 'EXT CORD 10GA 4GANG RUBR 200 338 338
4 500W PORT FLOOD w/PIGTAIL 300 636 636
1 HEAT SCANNER 250 819 819
1 I~ - Tnm I DeK BREAKER 150 79 79
~)
\
'J
October 15. 1901
Mayor and CIty CouncIl
Re: Overnight proposal of the FIre Department
The EMS group has been assured by the ChIef and the Fire
Department that their position is not being threateneO by the
adoption of new policies to improve fire service in Andover.
As EMS Coordinator. I support the purchase of beds in Station #1
and will encourage all EMS people to particIpate in any overnight
program instituted by the Fire Department.
Steve Brown
EMS Coordinator
~)
~RGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF OVERNIGHT STATION ASSIGNMENT
1. Survey shows over 80 percent of the FirefIghters want to try
it.
2. It would provIde the CIty wIth the response of a full paid
department for the cost of a Volunteer Department.
3. It would improve response times on fires and medIcal calls.
4. It is an establIshed standard for volunteer fIre servIce in
Brooklyn Park, Roseville, White Bear Lake, and others
5. It would Improve morale for the followIng reasons:
a) FirefIghters who don't live by the statIon would have a
chance to make first truck out on a call.
b) Three-man teams would get to know each other, creatIng
greater comradery.
c) Teams can be mIxed between day/nIght/rescue, whIch will
help to reduce bIckerIng and Jealousy.
d) For obvIous non-emergency calls (ie. police request for
washdown), 50 FirefIghters would not have to be awakened
Just to stand around.
e) More FirefIghters would have an opportunIty at leadership.
f) It would allow FirefIghters leisure tIme to acquaint
themselves wIth location and operation of equIpment.
g) It would allow tIme for voluntary traInIng by IndIvIduals.
h) Ideas, suggestIons, plans for better servIce would almost
certaInly result as FIrefIghters dIscuss theIr thoughts.
6. Everybody wIll be fully traIned as fIrefIghters, FIrst
responder,and Haz-Mat-Level One.
7. ExtracatIon equIpment would be on the respondIng truck with
traIned personnel to run It.
8. Three FIrefIghteres In uniform would look more professIonal
than in Jeans and T-shIrt.
9. Station crews would be able to provIde some maint. on trucks
and station, eliminating the FIfth Wednesday work detaIl.
10. ResIdents would be gettIng increased fire protection within
current budget, without Increased cost.
,
'J
11. ResIdents would have a visibly manned station to stop by and
ask questions and look at equipment, etc.
12. It would help resolve manning problems with EMS.
13. It would Increase the number of stop bys IncreasIng staff at
no cost.
~-~
~
--~
(Advantages 2)
14. It would eliminate the need for weekend duty officer pay.
15. There would be no driving of private cars to a scene.
16. The EMS rig would not be sitting outside all the time
eliminate rust, breakdowns, starting cold and less running
around and fuel consumption.
17. Duty crews would be able to work on preplans, burn permits,
thus saving money on Assistant Fire Marshal pay.
18. There would always be a minimum of three people responding to
a call where there is as few as one responding at this time.
, ,
,j
-)
ARGUMENTS AGAINST OVERNIGHT STATION ASSIGNMENT
1. It would demand tIme from the FirefIghters' busy schedules.
2. It would take FIrefighters away from home two or three
nIghts a month -- spouses may have some reluctance.
3. It would increase management responsibIlItIes of the officers
in assIgning shIfts, duty projects, medical response, etc.
4. Possible boredom by personnel.
5. Response time is already improved by relocation of stations.
:~
jf :----
/; SICO Room ~ers@ Wall System
i ;OSAL FOfL ~() In l?e.r Af'\
I
/ RESS
----. ~-----'-'--------- '-
,
J'f
I JME PHONE
JATE
OTHER
STATE
OFFICE
ZIP
(
TOTAL ROOM HEIGHT c:J l=:J initial
TOTAL SYSTEM HEIGHT C:J
------- - -- -~-_... _."-.,~- --'. -->. -- .', -----. -~.,._--,--,~, .~._--._-,-- -.......---...--.---- -'-~- ".--. .
-------
-'----:-.~~-._,~- -', '-.- ----~-- '--'~~ -.-.~ -- ._---'... - "'-. '. --- ..
-'-'~~'- --- -
tll" ~I " 10 " 41/ t_~ " lH (, I ~/I 4:J If H/' 4j I,
I ~ ,
.
..,
I
,~-- .. , - ,...----
r
."----,--. '-'".- "-~-' - -- -, r ,- ,. . -. '-
I
',--. - -,_. "-,~ .' --,On ----,.-.,.." ~.~~,----- -'-"---
--. "'- -- - -._,- .--.,-
TOTAL WIDTH OF WAll 8~S 41"tw,n ~ .4 j
56 "double ~ J
TOTAL SYSTEM WIDTH 62V2"Queen
System Finish Req'd Part No. Description Price Each Total
.,.,., <<::l
System Style 5 \'1 1.11L -DC;:} _IWIV'\ .eit-~ ~ JJ lj;- ~h"Iu!) "'",,: f--'
Special Notes I .Al ....h
Mmfft .5' llil- C7l.ff ;; lhJ'f-.IDMp ..:bN 11/\ et:.hl..L\. 1.o1'i"~Lr~ . 'T<H:\ ... ,rl. mo.
~ \ .
""'- ?
6 .55.1-5 6\V'\ale..LI~Jts jp't \,D .'dJ)5-;....
~m~~ ,,-, n
5 .5~O ..5-l.Jll_Q 1(7- . VlP.af'LPAf~ l2.1 - vOS~
~
<"(/J()3 -- ~ .ll.X If 5
~13(:l) -;. 1'3 1 e- -~~ . ..-,n
^ l1~q~,....
.n \ v~ -ht;~IIll.14-_aT t'tL trvu.. I .
. , . l ...dl .
I %...:tQJ ICt,.,.tll \'''Y\ I Ci o~ -- ..oW" J.')e.rf L ~crr') ~
I J''\/i,; ;-\/\ x ..! I f) /'l rl.fJ'
JJ,~1 ..l~ TOTAL I foI-j 't.5. """ -
CJ"="'~. ~ - TAX
DELIVERY
Quotation Number 0 1o\~9L by G(;\2.\I!WVIV5
I
, ,
i
"
,_J
Accepted by
n<!"lot....
MURPHY WALL-BEDS
5 STATE AREA
~-.J
Mr. Roger Enterprises
3752 West Broadway
Minneapolis, MN 551/22
{672} 521-3967
Once in a great while
a product quietly moves
back into world prominence.
ROGER CAMPBELL
President
ORDER /? 11 SHIP
DATE q d'C-<-t. ROUTING
~~~~ T~iu-..'U,-- ;p~.lfj
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE ZIP
ATTENTION H f'3~~93';f?'
.
SHIP TO
NAME
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ATTENTION
!~'9l~
CUSTOMER NO
TERMS ~ d-t~ A c.l.~
,
SALES
APP. SHIP WK. r;1Lj-"-
DATE SHIPPED
FOB
YOUR ORDER NO. OUR ORDER NO.
QUANTITY QTY. UNIT AMOUNT
ITEM ORDERED DESCRIPTION SHIPPED PRICE DUE
,
vJ /' H'"^-'- ~~ U / c;i/Cj 4.71~
. \ ~
3'1 'f- ... ./
/11ftI' ta,laZE/~ c.\~ tJ ) I
!u!<,:!i /U/t.Li/J'f-#J- _
- ,/
,,-- u/kf2{:)Rc73e d~il\',:TS 79 197!/
~ .:J
)
~j,~ ~
~ 9~ 4r-;~
,)
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER
ZIP
&73 \t?e~
INVOICE DATE TOTAL
DUE
7/9~
~O! Andover city Council
~
, )
'ROM: Bob Peach, Bond coordinator
3UBJECT: Computer Purchase
The Fire Department is requesting approval to purchase a new
~omputer system as part of our overall Bond purchase. Below is a partial
.ist of planned uses for this system:
- Incident reports and analysis
- Maintaining member training, license, and certification information
- Truck, equipment, and supply inventories
- Maintaining personnel records
- Truck and equipment maintenance and repair records
- Pre-incident plans
- Attendance records
- Point counting
- Building inspection tracking and reporting
- Memos, letters, and spreadsheets
- Budget preparation, analysis, and tracking
- Burning and recreational fire permit tracking
- Fire hydrant locations and specifications
- Training and education
In developing a list of specifications for the new system, our
:omputer Committee came up with many requirements including:
- A hard disk for data storage
_ A fast processor for immediate access to emergency materials such as
Pre-incident Plans, Hazerdous Materials information, and Hydrant
locations and specifications as well as processing large volumes of
data.
_ A modem for transmitting and receiving files such as sending
incident reports to the State.
System specifications and price quotes requested and received from
:hree vendors are attached. We are requesting approval to purchase the
3ystem from PC Express for $3,09S. This is the lowest of the three bids
(ComTech had the exact same price for the hardware but do not deal in
3oftware). For comparison purposes, we also contacted two software
iealers (Software Etc. and Egghead) to check their prices on the Word
?rocessing and Spreadsheet packages.
In addition to the word Processing and spreadsheet software, we are
~equesting approval to purchase a software system called Prober Chief
:rom DataAge Solutions, Inc. This package (designed specifically for the
?ire Service) is comprehensive modular system that will be used to
;apture, maintain, and report all of our Personnel and Training data,
:ncident reports, Property and Occupancy information, Preplans, Fire
?revention information, Inventory, and more. This system comes with
1early 300 pre-written reports, online help, and complete documentation.
r~'~ system is currently being used in ColUmbia Heights, Minnetonka,
~,_je Grove, New Brighton, and several other Twin cities Departments as
Nell as Departments across the Country. The system is available for a
limited time at $2,995 compared to a list price of $3,980.
~=5ire Department Computer Quotes
PC EXPRESS
ComTech
SOFTWARE
TAYLORS
~BM Compatible 386 (25 MHZ)
~ MB RAM
~o MB Hard Drive
':'.2 MB 5.25" Floppy Drive
_.44 MB 3.5" Floppy Drive
A" VGA Color Monitor
~01 Keyboard
15 DOS 5. 0
Jpgrade to 4MB RAM
Jpgrade to 80 MB Hard Drive
$1,525.00
$108.00
$J.l9.00
$165.00
$1,695.00
$1,860.00
Jpgrade to 33 MHZ
!4 PIN NLQ Printer (132 column)
~400 Baud Internal Modem
$120.00
$369.00
$59.00
$2,300.00
$100.00
$425.00
$80.00
$2,300.00
$200.00
$395.00
Included
$2,455.00
~otus Symphony (2)
iicroSoft Word (3)
$549.00
$249.00
$3,098.00
N/A $495.00
N/A $249.00
$2,300.00 (1) $~,4~].DO
---------
---------
---------
---------
=3=;=qq~O=O
:1) ComTech does not handle software.
:2) software Etc. & Egghead price for symphony were $625.50 and $549.99.
:3) software Etc. & Egghead price for MS Word were $249.99 and $249.99.
~
~)
<~"""~."".~".'"''',.'''
"f1>;~
~i",:\
;!1 fi
~ ~
~ ~
't\, l
!i~,~, ,;t
"~ "',
l;-loJ:'~~~,f'-~;~-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
November
BY:
Non-Discussion Items
Engineering
~
~
ITEM
NO.
02.
Accept Petition/Meadow
Creek Estates
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring
the adequacy of petition and ordering the preparation of a
feasibility report for the Meadow Creek Estates, Project 91-26,
for street signs. See attached petition and map of the area to
be considered for street light installation.
Total number of lots that benefit from street lights in Meadow
Creek Estates - 88
Number in favor of street lights - 53
Number against street lights (a few indicated No but did not sign
the petition) - 13
Unavailable - 22
COUNCIL ACTION
.'
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
,
:,)
(J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND
OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS OF
ORDERING PREPARATION
STREET LIGHTING
, PROJECT
AREA.
NO. 91-26 IN THE
MEADOW CREEK ESTATES
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition, dated
October 3 , 19~, requesting the construction of
improvements; and
WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to contain the
signatures of more than 35% of the affected property owners
requesting such improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover that:
1. The petition is hereby declared as adequate.
2. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to AEC
and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a
feasibility report.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
day of
Council at a
meeting this
19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
WI/4 COHN<H
S<C, 33
'@
\0
~---:>~.~~- 7N
,-STATE
.~--
r@
r-
l
'>
\.
'-{',,\.~'"
.'
',:';..'>' . .~....._1'(-...iJ..~tr
",
"
'~,
)
I
I'
\
"\
\
.'
\
~.
t
~
I
~
i
I,
'I
,
,
\
~
......,.;~.J:"",...~:'('.,.,...T.':.
. . .~..#!'"_"!' ........-~~..-~r;;1I
'i);
.
'.
"~.
-'...
'<
~.. II";";" -...-.....",
!
c
1
,.
.
,
~
.
1
l
i
~
,
I
~
~
~
;
I
~
~ !
,
~
~
~
~;
~
~
~
j
{\
\..J
~
.~-l
I / <
&<.)
y
\V-1~~ . t I
6;fOvr
./
;
~)
~Hi E----(;'-. t""f-~I:i-,{JZ.D~'
" ' ., I' ~ ~" ,
~,,'; . .,~, , i:. .
i ;' J' r ~ 199111
..J_,'" )
CITY of ANDOVER
CITY OF ANDOVER
Date: 10 -:=, -cn
No. 'f/-1.b
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
)::;77fut! f /#a~ ,S-)-AP./!- ,4t/lCJl/e(
(~ E6faTe>)
do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved by
Construction of City "5/..;I.(>(O/- JIO~ 4;
"
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
DESCRIPTION
./
.;<
X
./
J
r'"E S
V
NO
v:'"
C-,../
v
~
/'
This petition was circulated by:
Address: B 3&2 3 30YlsuJI <;1
Ln-: ~~~ 910...
4n/"laoi':l', /7l rJ
/
~
9 '1
- i( h t\-.A J LJ-(J CJ. - 9.:; 0')
~1o~
i
, ,
1...::-,
\..
-:;;
..;;
))-
CITY of ANDOVER
~
Date:
"""
'-
No.
f
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
-r-CMtl/;/" f-)k,o.~-l sl-tU!~f- ~rk{,e(
do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved by
Construction of City Sir/pel- /1<>/,.1:<;
1
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER
ADDRESS
.-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
YES
NO
~
x
:.:j {
57:, ' '''''.' .
'/
---
<J
This petition was circulated by:~~~jrt\~
Address:
I
I
3
,)
CITY of ANDOVER
Date:
,}
No.
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
-s (7V1 /; ,,,1 I- Ika I-N 1
~/"Pej-
?r.~
do hereby petition that said p~rtion of said area be improved by
Construction of City ,t::,.J/Pr"/.. /1<;111-,;
, /
and that the
property, as
cost of said improvement be assessed against the
auth)rized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
OWNEd ADDRESS YES
benefiting
NO
/
I ~:
I
/('
/
/
x
This petition was circulated by:
Adq.ress:
1....-
L; ~-, ~,,~(\~~
\0
~J
fJ~f
CITY of ANDOVER
?~
/''\~O,,~~C
',-) '\' \' ~
\\0
Date:
I
(
\
No.
(,. \
Gentlemen:
'.'..
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following'4escribed
area:
do hereby petition that said portion of said area be
Construction of City
~/
~/'
'\'-.?'>J
",,-
improved bz)
"
7
/
,
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws'-of Minnesota\
'r ". ' ~
' ":---" " . \
SIGNATURE OF OWNER ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRII0 ES NO
,'''-...
I
j
./
v'
J
'-)
10
This petition was circulated by:
Address:
Lt) ,,; 1fvJd/Ja
'1.0
.:J'
CITY of ANDOVER
Date:
No.
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved by
Construction of City
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429) Laws of Minnesota.
YES
NO
/lff
I
J
/
\../
j)10U fit)
Xi
f)\
j>(.-
~
mOurrr
-/
....--
This petition was circulated by:
Address:
:/
k,- JklaJ/a
"/;-
. ')
- ,
J
:)
~J Do u 9 /4. S ;VI. $-f-oc. k. q VV\ P I 3 Co 17 J6,J 9 u i I S i, tIJ. UJ. yes n 0
J) tb(cv \'<\ QY(v{\ -~ ~ \.vt i, /Oft 810<5' ~ t, Sf nW. ~
I "3 t.t \ ~ tleo.-tke.r H. ---
----
\3~
r; (2,~1" M. iN rI /. AWl 5
3//"c 8,v,.;f(-tv Lo..'K~ f5ll/D ,JW
\)~1'J ~eA~ sr.
Ye5
---
J?I~ -Pi~.-L /3~/(" de<<ilerr_ _H
--'
.~-
'\
,~)
/ ~,
'-...-J
'~/'"""'"''''''''''>''''
~( If,
f ~
" ".'
(,-)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE November 5, 1991
Non-Discussion Items
ITEM rteCelve t'easlol.l1ty/
NQ 91-25/Hidden Creek
aJ. East 4th
Engineering ~~y
Todd J. Haas
APP~ ,~~rOR
AG~I {N
Byl
/
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
feasibility study, waiving public hearing, ordering improvement
and directing preparation of plans and specifications for the
improvement of project 91-25 for sanitary sewer, watermain,
storm drains and streets in Hidden Creek East 4th Addition area.
A copy of the feasibility study is in your packet.
COUNCIL ACTION
'-
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
~)
, '\
'-./'
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
STUDY, WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING,
PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
OF PROJECT 91-25 FOR
IN THE FOLLOWING AREA
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
S.S., WM, ST, AND STORM DRAINS
HIDDEN CREEK EAST 4TH ADDITION
WHEREAS, the City Council did on the 15th day of October
19 91 , order the preparation of a feasibility study for the
improvements; and
WHEREAS, such feasibility study was prepared by TKDA and
presented to the Council on the 5th day of November , 19~; and
WHEREAS, the property owners have waived the right to a Public
Hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the feasibility study and
declares the improvement feasible, for an estimated cost of
$ 176,029.95
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover to hereby receive the feasibility report with an estimated
total cost of improvements of $ 176,029.95 , waive the Public
Hearing and order improvements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby direct the
firm of TKDA to prepare the plans and specifications for such
improvement project.
BE IT STILL, FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council to hereby
require the developer to escrow the sum of $ 8,000.00 with such
payments to be made prior to commencement of work on the plans and
specifications.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the
day of
City Council at a
Meeting this
19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
victoria Volk - City Clerk
l,~';f""C"-"'~"'''>\,\
;'f '!.
~,j ';1\
~ ~
~) ~\~ )
'''"","-..."".1''
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
November 6, 1991
Non-Discussion Items
ITEM uraer ::icreec Llgnc/
NO. Bunker Lake Blvd. &
~j. Jay st.
Engineering ?
APP~,~~OR
AGE!)K1'
(
By:i
/
BY: Todd J. Haas
The city Council is requested to consider installing a street
light at the intersection of Bunker Lake Boulevard and Jay street
NW.
Kottke' Bus Service, Inc. contacted the city staff regarding the
intersection and the lack of a light as the bus company is
usually operating during earlier and later periods of the day.
It is recommended to install a light at the intersection. The
light would not be ordered until January of 1992. The City would
pay for the installation and the ongoing energy and maintenance
costs, as the City is currently doing at other County/City street
intersections.
For information the City is spending approximately $14,500 per
year for County road and City street intersections.
COUNCIL ACTION
) MOTION BY
'- TO
SECOND BY
rFA~"\
,)\~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
November 5, 1991
ITEM
NO.
Accept streets/Kelsey
Estates
BY:
Todd J. Haas
Non-Discussion Items
Engineering
The city Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
the streets for Kelsey Estates as requested by the developers,
Jerry and Carol Windschitl.
The testing of the bituminous is complete. The City had a
consulting firm observe the thickness and density on site when
the contractor was paving. It is our feeling by having a
consultant on site was a benefit for the city and the developer
as results were available immediately to the contractor and also
will save some dollars for the the developer.
The only item that will require City Council discussion is the
street plan and profile that has been approved by the City
Engineer indicated a pavement diameter of 100 feet for the
cul-de-sacs. At the time the streets were constructed the
ordinance required 100 foot diameter in the rural area.
Note: The developer is required to submit as built plans showing
all improvements as finally constructed and installed per
Ordinance 10, Section 10.07.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
'- TO
SECOND BY
',)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO. R
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL STREET CONSTRUCTION OF KELSEY
ESTATES AS BEING DEVELOPED BY JERRY AND CAROL WINDSCHITL IN
SECTION 19-32-24 AND SECTION 20-32-24.
WHEREAS, the developer has completed the streets of Kelsey
Estates.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to hereby approve the final street construction
of Kelsey Estates contingent upon providing the following:
1. Developer provide a 1 year performance bond or an
escrow as determined by the City Engineer from the
date the bituminous was placed.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 5th
day of
November
, 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Attest:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
\
'J
'/'~'/""""""""\"\
~. ~
';~ t:J
~J\" ,/
-'~,,:_~~,,'lllitjf!f!;1li1;'F
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
November 5, 1991
AGENDA SECTIO,N .
NO. Non-Dlscusslon
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTME~
Planning ~
ITEM
NO.
d?
Order Ad for Bids
Con. Dining Fac.
David L. Carlberg,
BY: Ci ty planner
APP:~0JOR
AGE(Dt ~
BY:!
V
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to order an ad for bids to improve the
Senior Center to a congregate dining facility. The City will be
using funds from the Community Development Block Grant program to
complete the project. The funds to be used are the $40,000 the
City borrowed to Blaine in 1990. The City must use these funds by
December 31, 1992.
The bid will be required to be submitted to the Anoka Union as
well as minority contractors in the Metropolitan Area.
COUNCIL ACTION
,
) MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
~,)
'l~r;"""""'''''''''''''>'~''''-
l? "l
" ~,
:':'1,',,' , , ,',~'
1 I,)
l~ Ii
't",,/"
""",~, ,~1l~
'~~-!Ii!i'~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ITEM Appoint Tree Comm.
NO.
a~ Chair & Act. Chair
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT "I)
Planning t:C-
David L. Carlberg,
City Planner
November 5, 1991
BY:
~~~'lf ~ED FOR
I / i""
\)0
BY:)
AGENDA SECTLON .
NO. Staff, Comml ttee,
Commission
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to officially appoint Bob
Whitcraft as Chairperson of the Andover Tree Commission and Scott
Thomas as Acting Chairperson. Listed below are the dates their
terms expire.
Bob Whitcraft (Term Expires 12/31/92)
Scott Thomas (Term Expires 12/31/92)
NOTE: Jim Siirila has resigned from the Tree Commission. Staff
asks that the City Council announce the availability of the
position to Andover residents. Interested parties should complete
an application at the City HaIl Offices.
COUNCIL ACTION
,~
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
,,)
C_:,:~,"'i'C""'""iC""","."
c,' "
,~ "','1
(f '~
"~;. bl
"\. "r
\",'>",._e,,"-<,,~f
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
November 5, 1991
ITEM
NO.
.,:;z?
Certify Delinquent
utili ties
BY:
Howard D. Koolick ID<-
Finance Director
APPROVED FOR
AGEr[h
Byl
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
v
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to adopt the attached
resolution certifying delinquent water and sewer accounts to the
County Department of Property Tax Administration for collection
with 1992 taxes.
BACKGROUND
On October 8th, a letter was sent to all water and sewer accounts
with balances delinquent from at least the April 1991 billing,
informing them of the City's intent to certify these charges to
their taxes if not paid by November 5, 1991. Since the due date
for payments is November 5th, I will supply City Council with a
listing of accounts at the meeting.
A total of 161 letters, totaling $21,004.87, were sent. In 1990,
nine fewer letters were sent, however, the total dollars were
$5,059.14 higher.
In contrast to prior years, very few residents have contacted
either Charlene Welu, Utility Billing Clerk or myself regarding
the letter and potential certification.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
, TO
SECOND BY
"
,,)
'\
\.~..,/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -91
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING TO THE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAX
ADMINISTRATION FOR COLLECTION, UNPAID SEWER AND WATER USER
CHARGES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 32 and Ordinance No. 55, the
following charges on the attached Exhibit A are hereby certified
to the County Department of Property Tax Administration to be
placed on the tax rolls and collected with the 1992 taxes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 5th
day of November , 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
:_J
~..,:,_.,,, ... '1",_",
<~/""~"'
'--;:;< ~I;~
fj:,~
~ ~
~J H
~ p
"t" ~':J'~
" .
~\-"""~__"'$~~;t,f,1I!i~,j'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ITEM Certify Clean-Up
NO< Costs
018.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
Howard D. Koolick ~
Finance Director
BY:
November 5, 1991
REQUEST
APPR~OFOR
AG lA
( . /
BY:~
/
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion Items
The Andover City Council is requested to adopt the attached
resolution certifying the costs associated with the health hazard
at 2526 - 138th Avenue NW.
BACKGROUND
Attached is a copy of the letter sent by David Almgren acting as
the City Health Officer. Under state statute Section 145A.08 (a
copy of which is attached), the City may assess the cost of the
enforcement activity against the property. The City has arranged
for garbage collection for this property. The following is a
listing of the costs paid to Gallagher's Service Inc. for this
service.
Check #13056 dated 10/15/91
Check to be approved 11/5/91
Total
$ 170.18
83.86
$ 254.04
This total represents garbage collection service from September 5,
1991 through November 30, 1991.
Based on the wording in Section 145A.08, the City can only assess
the costs of abatement or removal and cannot assess administrative
costs incurred.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
~-,
~~
\
)
--'
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -91
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING TO THE 1992 TAXES, GARBAGE COLLECTION
CHARGES FOR THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS 33 32 24 14 0022.
WHEREAS, in accordance with State Statute Section 145A.04,
subdivision 8, the City Health Official notified the property
owner at 2526 - 138th Avenue Northwest that a public health
nuisance existed: and
WHEREAS, the property owner did not take the required action
to abate or remove the nuisance within the required time: and
WHEREAS, State Statute Section 145A.04, subdivision 8(d),
authorizes the City to abate or remove the nuisance if the
property owner neglects or fails to comply with the notice from
the Health Officer: and
WHEREAS, State Statute Section 145A.08 authorizes the City to
assess against the property the cost of abatement or removal.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to certify the cost of refuse collection at 2526 -
138th Avenue Northwest to the 1992 taxes in the amount of $254.04.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this 5th
day of November , 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
, ""
\
'-J
'']
I
'-./
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
August 28, 1991
Mr. Todd Nessett
2526 l38th Avenue NW
Andover MN 55304
Dear Mr. Nessett:
It has been brought to my attention that you have allowed an
excess amount of rubbish and garbage to accumulate in your
rear yard. Under State Health Law Section l45A.04, you are
hereby ordered to remove and abate this health hazard within
five (5) days from receipt of this notice.
Failure to comply shall result in the City ordering the
abatement and such cost assessed to the property for collection.
Sincerely,
~P7"'J
David Almgren
Health Officer
DA/jp
~ 'co;V:::::IOO '1-0... UQOU'l M((IU.CI ((I~
"3 ~ .~ ~-g :g S "E '0 \OO~ ~ rl' s ~ ~.~ 5 ~] 0 1:: ~ _ ~'E:' 0 .!:: 0 tj oS'o:: y o~ 00 ~.i:= :; ~
:i ... .... .... 0 cO - - cO.... .... Ul ...... cO u'" _ ::s: ...c: ~....,. l:::l::S: c.,;;.
~ N ~ ~ fi ~ ~ .8 g..( S 2 Q. ~ S ~ ~.9 t ij ~ ~ 8. g, 'E ~ ~~ ~ ~ G o~ ~ E .5 ~ ~ ::; ~
- 0 'a 8"0 . t: .( c..... 01 ........ 0 .....loll ~ "'0 "tj Q, 0.- 0 1'1:! .... iJ'ijl .... 0 8>> 0 ... 0 0 c.-
~- t: El ~ ~ c: 8:!:O ~ ': 5 ~.~ 0 ~ g;:) ~ ~ ~ -9.2 <<=I ~ ~ '- E ~ ::; u 'S fi 8 'E ~ C
1'1 0. ..g 8 ... ~ 8 ~ u M ~ ~ 8.~ ..c::l': 0'0 ... lj 9 p VI 0 0.2 ... 0 0 "0.0 'a E '8 8 3: 9 8;:)
e~ & og ~~ ~-S-:t) ~:a"tj ';0-9&5 o. "0 ~E::;'3H -S'E~ oEo> o~' ~"O
e 1'1 .... ~ ~ 'E E ~ oJ:!;: ~ .9 C~ := ~ b VlO fi ti ~.e ~ ~ ..r VI .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ : ~ ~ 9 .~ 1'1
...... "0 0 ~::i u ;a - 0. '0 > - __ ;:) "0 U ~ u 1'1 ... >. .... .t:J 0 e VI ... ... ._ ... .J:l U E E
rJ ",c '::: lj e '-u ~ GJ a :5 ~ ::; 8C:: E ~ ~ ::;.5::; 0 ~ g ~ -s .g ~ -a ~ a 0.'3 ~ .s .::: ~ '0 .~ 1'1 .s
.- u 1'1 .c: iJ - 0._ .... ~ II.) ....'" .... .t:J VI'- II.) C s::l c: ...' '-' .. .... c ...
:g ~ <2 . ... "'0 ..l:l ~.;: H 1'1 ~ > ~ O:::l 1'1 e ~ >. C\1.....d u::i ~ .... J:! € 0 8. t) . 1'1 0 U .~ II.)
"'0 ~ c:: oUlili- "'olio ..cOC"...,I ..... .c:0.......... C";;l o~ 1'1 b'~~..d ...Q,
.t:J;:) ~ .= ~ 1'1 '0 .- 2 "" ~ ~.9 So ~ -s ~.- '0 . s::l ~ "tj..c:: ~ c:: 4) 8 ~ ~ e.c:: ~ -:;.- -s '0 - 0
a go ~ '> ~ ~"O g ti 0 u ~ "0 '- ala .... -S VI ~ 0 C c: ... ~ ~ ~ 9 ... '- ~ o...a 9 a "":a.... ::.-
.., ~ ~ .- 0 .=:a a .9"';;; .. '" 0 .. ~ ~.~,;; ..., II ~ ~ ~ -:J 0 '" -" 0 ~ 1:.., ~ ~ 0 "0 ~' il
;"0 ~ 0"0 C;O =>>31- o.E~ gO~...8<:() ~ c::..c::i""o u~ 00."";:) .oSg-d' ~
~:; ~ ~ :; ;0:. g..c 8.8 r. ~ ~ 1'1 ~ oS ~ cu ~ ti ~ bE!: ..8 '0 ~ ~-9 ~ -g ~ -g fit ~ ~ i 1i 'fi O..ci t i
VI. r::: 001'1 C'!OI _ou2 .=1...0 "::I....:!l::> VI '~o 1'1 .J:lo- UI'1:=' _ ~ ,~ uQ"...,I
~ 43 t) 'i-..c Q, ~ VI~ 0 "0 ~}j '.0 u.... il g.- oS ~ c:: u in ...~ c:: "" 'E - - 0 C _ 0 >> 0 0 "" :2 ..cl ~ 0. c; off ....0
~ J:! u 0 - 0 4) .... el v .... ! ::3 ~ 0 .Cl VI .... 0 .t:J >. <II 0 1'1 Ol) _ U ... e VI ; t: -s 0 .a:l -.::1 VI 0 ~
Oll.;! :::l g -S 9 5 s rl g 1'1 fU' ~ 0. 0 8 .u ~ 0 .s .... ti ~ cu'o c .8'~ g a 0 VI tf 0::3 _ ceo d' a ~ :a ~ .
,.r "';; 8.t:: 9 oS ~ ] <<=I'~ ael t: 8 e e ~ 3: ~ ~ -s U 9 g ~ 00 ~ ~ ~o u ;! "0 8. ~ ..clo. g :: 8 ~ .~ =- 'E", .g .::- 0 :a.2" !l
~ l: "0 Co' .1:":..... Q;l 1'1 Co 8.......... C') =... ~ - I:: C .. VI 0 l< 1'1 ~ ... ";;l'= - CQ.o "0 e
11~ C U -g ~:o 0 i; U"O U ~ "0 '* 8 VI Q. ~ is ~ g.9 ~'i 1'1.... ..e ~ ......c: 0 .... Et.- ;0:..2 ~ 0 ~ ~.8 ~ I'Cl :a CI. ~ ~
_ ~ ~ ~ 1'1 ~ :g ~ 1'Cl': :I ~.9 is.~ 4) oS ~ 'O'g ~ ~.E "0 > 0 ,~ ~:2 g -d' E 8..s e e a 5 :a - g>> ~ 1'1 C ~.8 = ... ~
it-g ~ ~ .s ~ ~ [~ ~ .~f~.13 ~ ~ ~ ~ s g.g 0 ~ <: ~ ~ ~:; ~ ~ H .~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ e ~.~] fJ ~ '0 ~ ~ ~ e ~ ::;
l:S 1'1 ~..l:l a 8 0 a .2 1: VI ~ ",'-. .... 8 11 "0 > on ~ e 0 8 0 0'::: >>~ o.:s "0 ~ ... "" - 0. J:!.2 t:: 8 'a "" u '" ~ ~ is ...
~3 ~~~g~~U ~g8~~~~4 j~H~l5.~~~i ~~ i~.:l~n ~t~.:l;~~~ ~H~~~~~
~: ~='o::;.MI--"OSoa..gL~Q:lE 8.:a~ ~~~~!l:; 5~€'5~-S 0.5:5'3uO;: e."Rl'1eo~cuug te~:!.g~'EE
-s 0. .. ~ ~ >> . :a 0 ..;:... . 8 s.8".; II ~... ~ ~ S !l - S u > ~ 0 ..., ~ .. "'- ~ o.'~ 0 '" ~
1i ~ ~ 8 'R i], ~ g ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ -g ~ ~'E ~ ~ :; € r; ~ ~ j.~ a ~ ~~ ~.~.~ ~ ~ E ~.~ ~ ~ ~] ~ ~ .g ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ $
..Q "tj t.\ 00 8 "0 ~ l:I ~ 4) 't:I.- ~.,., 1'1 0 ~ P. t VI v 0. "" 4) co >. "0 "" as 00... c:: '"' B VI ~ Co 0... = >>......cl 0:::1"0 u ~"- r- oS
'c5 la ~ ~ ~.~ ::; a ~::; : ~.~:! d g 5'~ a 9 ~ e K~:: ~ R ~ ~ ~:~ ~ ~"R 13 ~13 ~,~ ~ g :s e E ~~.Ls ~] [~ ~ z ~ ~
"t:I ::; .;: u li~ 0. ~ ~ e;a a ~ ~ OQ c:I >. ~ :::1 0. t.\.2 ~ .. e.<II 0 5 gOd "0 ... Boo .s oS v:I.t:J 11 0 4) 0 0 . 4)..Q
S,:; ~ ~; t1 ~ vi ~.~ -0 ~:a d' [r-: ~ .~~ 00; ~~ 8 : .~o'" e- ~ la ~ g .s ~ 'S,j ~ ~ .s ~ ~.s ~ '5 ~ ~..Q ~ .; 8~ ~ ~ = ~~
.0 .t:J.-. ~;;S..d n <O.J ... O....Cl >> >>>0,..... c:: 1'1 _.Cl VI .Cl'" u 0 ~ c 0
<I <1~~!~~~.;~~a2S~b~8ll~~~~9~z~.o.o.ou~,8.~.~:-~~1:&~~~=:&=~ea:&~S
' C'!OI 1'1 ~ A VI ~.t:J.Cl J!3"" A,o :j.o.Cl 0 C.t:J.VI '- _ _ _ cu.- <<=1.001 -s v __ 0 el.t:J :::1 0 ~ .0::3 j.;; 9 ;> "" :::1 Q.) .t:J
e,( o;j ~ VI ~-S.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~.s ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ "'0 a. 8 ~ e ~ :::. ~ c i;' ~ ~ ~ oS 0 -5 :e E ~'f1 tfJ 'E:O'~ g, CIl P ~ [ & CIl a as
t:: "C .~ . ~ fJ ~;>> ..cl a.o 4) - a u.~ .0 g ::3';:1.0 fl I'Cl > .E '5 ;> 0 Q.) ~ 1'Cl;: .-, u :.::I ~ 0 0 J:!
~] .g ..M g g ~ '0 8 a 9 C'!OI ~:s g,,Q ~ g a: s'~ ~ ~ .a::; 8 .;: '0 .8 1'1 fi oS ~ .t:J '0 -S 8 0
~
t
<
~
:c
u
:i
!l
..
g
~
~
o
~
.d"'O j:I-..r::;-,:f >>-OU. U .UVI ....VI"t:I4)
-:; 0 J=l -.9 <<=I ClJ O.c; -5 .e ;.. '!::.;3 i:i :I ~ <<=I::a
~ .8 B e 11.2. ~ e ~ i- 0 .~ <C ~'I _ g >> :::1 ~:~
..d U u..Q 1'1 J=l >'"2 oJ - .Cl ~ 0 ~ 1'1'3 n-
,~ : t ~ '0 ~ R '0 ~ fl.~:E -.~ ~ g .8 ~ ~ ~
c:: '3 "0 1'1"0;::0 Clt ::; co 8 S ~ ~ .~ "0 II 0. C oS
e l:: ~ E 3 -s ~ :>.'~ ~ 0.!3 ~ :3 ti t :: 5": 0
E~ "O~~~~ E4)_b..... J~e~ ~~~a..,
88 u~->. ::3;>.;31'1 0_ _ oc::
o P. is.S !! -d 8 g. ~ o!t. ~ "0 cu "0 .... 'fil'Cl
~ c:: E ~ .2, t:i ~ <::!! ~ 4) :::i ~ ~:i 1'1 E. ~ u
o 'il" !! 0 "'.?: g .;;: 8. -s ~ 8 .!3'F. ~ :t.g 9 ~
Q- "O~o- ~o "t:IJ:! oS~rU .9~e~
,g E" g ~ ~ ~ as.~ "::I Q S fJ ~ B U Q, ~ E t; :; VI
:a u'i'l cu.8 ~ a'<;: i1.g'o "" U ..Q = t; C::8 e e'<;::"=
,VI [:> 0. ~ ~ ~~ ~..= ~ g ~ '0 e 8 ~ "0 '0 0.
r; .~ ~ ~'o >>E ~ .; s::g'i'l':: 'E.8 ~ a..d ,g :a"E fi
.~~ Ol .:l'~ 8 ~ ~ ; ~." ..~ 0 '" S'..,'''.. ~.8 8 'i3
.s:Jo ~>.8]~.8$0 ~ .8~~gi;ue....
....... _ . VI ~. V ";;l .,., .J:l.-.Jo ~ .,. _.J:l ~.c U 0
s~~-s=~S~~~-s~8~ -J!le~..~=o.
;9 -.,., i ~ 1'1 a <II ~ r: '5 0 u.~ .~ _.~ ~ 0 oS v .g C'!OI
.~ g:! ..Cl ~ a.s.~ c:I &.Cl ~;'3.8 ~ E.s fJ ~ ~ 3 ~!: on
:0 g g '0 ~ ri' g.2 = '0 '0 ~ 0 ..... 'E ~ 0 .8 ~ "tj~ o..g'~
~ ~.- ... s.;:.9 8 E .-.., !: (; -s 0 u !l.... 0 0 ll" .g
... E; ~ rJ ~ . .~ :"il ~ ~ !'l.!! ~ c: -s.., "" ~
8:! VI .& E 8';2 0 9 e.8 ~ ~.9 '0 ~] ~ '- ~ ~ ~ ~3
.q a.S e ::i8 VI'~ ~.~ ,g e ~ a ~ ~ -e ca ~ ~ .t:J nee ~
UO"gll.l =:J:1~ Ou ~ g;UlVl....~<:-::;"O~O"'"'
H] t~.H~ @ ~ !~g i !l~:8 ~.~ ~~i ~
CUuo.]CCd 1'1 9~OC AO VI:5~>>UOOO",",
.81;..188~'ilS~~~~d~t.:ll~Il~I~~~
~~....~.>eei~:$:;iSEi~~::E-dl'1a~g.6 ,fl ~
d C 0. ~ 0 0 ;9 :.= e>> 8..... U 0 ..... oS ca .a oG ~ u ....
8'~ ~ ~.g ~ ~ 1i ~ M e ::l 00 ~ ~ ~ g E ~ ,~vi ~.9.2:a >.
'"' 0 od v:I 0 0.J:l ~ . l,;;;; o.~ .... s' ~.J:l VI . ~ ti ~ ~ ~"
~ g.~ .g ~ g g '0 ~ :g ~ ~ rs ~ 7ii :g 1 ~ '0 ,9 ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~~
-~~~< "'_~'i3-S'i30~~B ...~~~5~~~
"'~ ...-s-s:a. -s.-so ..u;~.., ~&
.8'0 ::!;'l<Ua~.!l'l<~.a e~.8e :a.s.::J:l
t
<
~
u
:i
!l
..
g
~
~
;l;
oSg'o~ ::;.s~.s :5:3 = a-s8 -3 'o~g~
'5 'fi g:~ ~ >>6 00 ~ a ~ 'E ~ 'E a .g ~8 a
ei~~ S~E~ aQ >> ,;;",;; 8 p~~S
o . E t) g. 0 4) .2 t) ~ as ._ -a ._ "';; ~ "".,., ....
"0 ; '"' ~ , fj a :: 0 >> 8. 8 .9::1 .9 U ::Ia 0'" 0
:"~o..'" :ou-S '" E!~S 'il >>-"
.8:J0l!l~1l.;l-S~ Ss :$ 'i3~'" " ..Ea~
>>'- ~ ~ ."~ u co -5 Q, il ~ ..Cl ~ 6 -g 8::3 .2 ~
-~t:.9';J&."t:Ibg ~e ..cl ~'-::l 1'1 .a u~
. ~, fl"E.~ ~:a ~ .g ~ U 15 <<=I 0 g :S 'o.s ~ ~
15 ~ ~~H ~~~] ~ [ j n R ~ n~l
~ 8.E... . 3 t-t 3 0 ~ "0 >> t.\ 0 ~ .0. ~ VI .
eJ ::; [i.::J g~:$.,; ~;: .8:a .:l :a -S ~ 8~ d !l ~ ~L;;
""'" >>- <<=I.:::.;: iJ ~ U 0 -<>> '- S OQ 0 .9 '" U ~;:(66
~ E ~ ;:::) 1'1 !3 .Cl.Cl g >. ~ 0 _ .9 ?i l5 t) 'a oS j:l. OQ
o~ 815.s~:S 'oE-&a ~~ H Ji~: ~.g =.9.M:a
.... ~ ",,'r:' "0 <II "t:I co ..J cu >. ~ <.,;;, 0 "t:I ~"O'" ::3
<:.J:liJ..r~ ;'<;::Q_ gu .2 a"O'o I5."t:I","'O::;o
.J ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ '" ," II > 0. o:a S ~ 1;; ~... 9
o Cl ~ '-0 I'Cl ~ .t:J 0 ...r.E "ii.= 8 :; 0 & t.\ 1'1 !:l "'0 ~'.;
j:Q lI.l.J:l -is <II;::) j.;; U ~ .~"'d c:I
...a.......,!l~<~-1l~ a,;; ~ -s>>~ E.,i"':l
o g ~ ~.Q '0 ~ 9 ~ -g 8:a ~ ~ ~ ~ .& ~ ~.~ H 8
~ ... ~.o ~.., il "'.. 'a >> ~ 8" 0. ];" O;;l
ti ~.~ U :a =' g U ~.... ~.g ,~ '0.....9 :.~!. ~ ~"i
.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '0 i ~.~ ~ e ~.g.~ ~ ~ ~ a 1 ~ ~ ~ -;.
Q ,u ~ '0 ~ '0 ~ .... .: a.VI g-~.a:a ..8 g ~ oS 0 ~ ~ ,9-!a
~io~ ~o~"'''''':J1: 08'" 1l~-..~>>
'~ .g .g ..8.~ ::39 Q ~ :a :; ~ a..... 0. .s "t:I ..c:l -2 :E i go.D
="o<.>v.... ol'1OOQ -0 -e-:a ,-0.<11 ~
",'" 1-s.g & ~ 0.0.0 g, E g II 0'0 0 0 I: "il::; 1 ....
~."O ~"'OQ.8.-S5oau ..cl <llca.o "Oo.8"o..go
~~:a' :J:a<",'o~-s,,~~.. ~>>Jj :aia'<.....>>E
.... 0 e'-' 0 .... ... Q Oii i1 a 0 .D ...., u; OQ 1'1
o~oo_~ .~o"o '0. 0 -o."'~ .8> .0188
~.~~-S~oN~C.Dt)MUC')O 00 o'-~.ov_~
'fl 8. ....r; ~ . i .9 "'0 1'1 . "0 - ~ w 8 E. rl ~ g . -< :"::l -: '8
....l5 01:: u..cli::' ...l.Llou ... _:1M
Q;::)u"Oa&~t).~~~g~"'~-<<=I__"'O>'d_o~e~_...
~~-s~8Jj~fl "E~~ e:J,~::S[i:S~~ .;f~a
VI ~-u-... d ~U..c:l W uS'... e lonu
;!; ..i::jg.;39 88.8:: ~~ ,~ 2u~:l ....]:!;'o
,;i
.1111 I
:/'[
:111 r --,~
,III',)
'Ii
, '~
14SA.07 LOCAL PUBIJC HEALTH ACT
(h) This section does not alter the responsibility of the delegating authority for the
performance of duties specified in law.
History: 1987, C 309 s 7
145A.08 ASSESSMENT OF COSTS; TAX LEVY AUTHORIZED.
Subdivision I: Cost of care. A person who has or whose dependent or spouse has
a communicable disease that is subject to control by the board of health is financially
liable to the unit or agency of government that paid for the reasonable cost of care
provided to control the disease under section 145A.04, subdivision 6.
Subd. 2. Assessment of costs of enforcement. (a) If costs are assessed for
enforcement of section 145A.04, subdivision 8, and no procedure for the assessment
of costs has been specified in an agreement established under section 145A.07, the
enforcement costs must be assessed as prescribed in this subdivision.
(b) A debt or claim against an individual owner or single piece of real property
resulting from an enforcement action authorized by section 145A.04, subdivision 8,
must not exceed the cost of abatement or removal.
(c) The cost of an enforcement action under section l45A.04, subdivision 8, may
be assessed and charged against the real property on which the public health nuisance,
source of filth, or cause of sickness was located. The auditor of the county in which
the action is taken shall extend the cost so assessed and charged on the tax roll of the
county against the real property on which the enforcement action was taken.
(d) The cost of an enforcement action taken by a town or city board of health
under section I 45A.04, subdivision 8, may be recovered from the county in which the
town or city is located if the city clerk or other officer certifies the costs of the
enforcement action to the county auditor as prescribed in this section. Taxes equal to
the full amount of the enforcement action but not exceeding the limit in paragraph (b)
must be collected by the county treasurer and paid to the city or town as other taxes
are collected and paid.
Subd. 3. Tax levy authorized. A city councilor county board that has formed or
is a member of a board of health may levy taxes under sections 275.50 10 275.56 on
all taxable property in its jurisdiction to pay the cost of performing its duties under this
chapter.
History: 1987 C 309 s 8
fi
!".
;, i,
) 'i!
",i!
;:!i
.,....;.,.i.
.,1
~;j i
I
\
.~
COMMUNITY HEALTH BOARDS
145A.09 PURPOSE; FORMATION; ELIGIBILITY; WITHDRAWAL.
Subdivision 1. General purpose. The purpose of sections 145A.09 to l45A.l4 is
to develop and maintain an integrated system of community health services under local
administration and within a system of state guidelines and standards.
Subd. 2. Community health board; eligibility. A board of health that meets the
requirements of sections l45A.09 to l45A.13 is a community health board and is
eligible for a community health subsidy under section 145A.13.
Subd. 3. Population requirement. A board of health must include within its
jurisdiction a population of 30,000 or more persons or be composed of three or more
contiguous counties to be eligible to form a community health board.
Subd. 4. Cities. A city that received a subsidy under section 145A.13 and that
meets the requirements of sections 145A.09 to 145A.13 is eligible for a community
health subsidy under section 145A.13.
Subd. 5. Human senices board. A county board or a joint powers board of health
that establishes a community health board and has or establishes an operational human
services board under chapter 402 must assign the powers and duties of a community
health board to the human services board.
Subd. 6. Boundaries of community health service areas. The community health
3574
Yi
~
,.
...
~ L..-:'
*'
,,' w
4
-.,j
J:
;;:,c
"":'
~
'l>
~
tft
1
',-"~.~",-",,,
'~'~~~}.~:>;:;,~
..~" ';',---'fo :~. ~.E~<:~~~;1
> . ~' .
3575
service area of a mult
region designated und
by the commissioner
directly involved or ti
regional development.
act in place of the reg
Subd. 7. Withd
community health bo
sections 145A.09 to I,
section 145A.03, subd
(b) A county or c
board during the firs!
adoption of the joint ~
(c) The withdraw,
affect the eligibility for
for one calendar ye"r j
(d) The amount c
pursuant to Minnesot.
tracted from the subsid
board, ceases to meet
payment was made.
History: 1987 C 18,
145A.I0 POWERS Al
Subdivision 1. G
of a board of health pre
as well as the general re~
system of community h
Subd. 2. Preeml
community health plan
community health sen
operation, except as au
subdivision 2, or deleg;
otherwise allowed by th
(b) This subdivisioJ
of any city or county eli
(c) This subdivisio
health services program
program of community
300,000 or more persOl
preempt the city's powe
Subd. 3. Medicaj
employ, or contract witl
and direction for the boa
tion of community healt
Subd. 4. Employe,
functions and duties are
ees of the board without]
subdivision does not affe
Subd. 5. Communit
submIt to the comnmslc
under section 145A.12, s
community health plan I
and the integration, devc
meet the priority needs
/'''~''''''''''''''''''''''\\'~
,;1 ?
,) 1", ,c"J
~ .~
"- \"~,~~"c;ffi~...;ijl
,~~........."~=
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE November
AGENDA SECTION .
NQ Non-D1SCUSSlon
ITEM
NO.
;?
Adopt Res/Establish-
ing Fees
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
V. vOlkb.6.
BY:
The City Council is requested to adopt the attached resolutions
establishing fees and service charges.
These should be adopted before the end of the year so that I can
send out renewals for cigarette and liquor licenses.
The following fees are being proposed to be changed:
Rezoning - from $150 to $200.
Special Use Permits - add Commercial SUPs at $190.00.
Variances - Single family - from $50.00 to $75.00
Other requests - from $75.00 to $100.00
On-Sale Non-Intoxicating Liquor - from $100 to $200
Lot Split Fee - from $65.00 to $100.00
Cigarette License - from $12.00 to $25.00
Sign permits - from .50/sq. ft. to $1.00/sq. ft.
Special Assessment Searches - from $5.00 to $12.00
City Maps - from $1.00 to $1.50
Ordinance 8 - from $3.00 to $20.00
Bad Check Fee - from $10.00 to $20.00
I believe these changes were discussed at one of the budget
meetings held this fall.
,V:Attachs.
, \ MOTION BY
....-/ TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
~
A RESOLUTION SETTING FEES FOR PERMITS, REZONINGS, SPECIAL USE
PERMITS, VARIANCES, PLATTING LICENSE FEES, SEWER USER FEES, WATER
FEES, LOT SPLITS, RENTAL FEES AND VARIOUS OTHER FEES.
, .
I
I
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains:
The following fees are hereby established for the year 1992:
Type of Fee
Rezoning
Recording Fee/rezoning
Special Use Permit
Commercial
Residential
Amended Special Use Permit
Recording Fee/special use
Variances
Single Family
Other Requests
Sign Permits
Plat Fees
preliminary Plat Filing Fee
preliminary Plat per acre fee
Final Plat Fee
Sewer Availability Charge
Contractor Licenses
General Contractors
Non-Intoxicating Liquor
Off Sale
On Sale
Excavator License
Street Opening Permit
Lot Spli t Fee
Recording Fee/Lot Split
Junkyard License
Cigarette License
Outdoor Party Permit
Dog License
Fire Hydrant Rental
Intoxicating Liquor
On Sale Liquor
On Sale Wine
Off Sale Liquor
Transient Merchant License
Fee
$ 200.00
15.00
190.00
150.00
50.00
15.00
Ordinance
8DD
8DD
8DD
75.00
100.00
1.00/sq. ft.
40.00
7.50
15.00
700.00
25.00/yr.
5.00/yr.
40.00/yr.
200.00/yr.
25.00
5.00
100.00
15.00
750.00
25.00/yr.
5.00
3.00/2 yr.
Deposit plus
.94/thousand gal.
3,500.00/yr
500.00/yr.
150.00/yr.
25.00/6 months
8DD
8
10J
13
22E
28B
28B
35A
35A
40D
44E
45A
51A
53
55F
56A
56A
56A
79
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of , 19
~J
Attest:
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
,J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO. R
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SERVICE CHARGES TO BE COLLECTED.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains:
The following service charges are hereby established for the year
1992:
Service Charge
Well & Septic Locate
Special Assessment Search
City Maps
Zoning Maps
Copies (per sheet)
Wage Assignments
Ordinance 8
Ordinance 10
All other ordinances
Notary
Bad Check fee
$30.00/hour
12.00
1. 50
3.00
.20
3.00
20.00
2.00
1. 00
3.00
20.00
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of
, 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Attest:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
;:J
"'..::;,..;.J..,..,:....""."..."..'":n.,'!-~
'T~:" '\,
/;' 't,',.
!{j
.'. .(f
~ J
'0-"~~,~_",'f:!fii~-1i'F'
CITY OF ANDOVER
."J
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
November 5, 1991
DATE
\
APPROVE~ I OR
AGEN[ f\
)~
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Non-Discussion Items
Admin.
ITEM
NO.
--30.
t-
Accept Resignation/Bld~.
Department Clerk BY:
James E. Schrantz
BY: I
to accept Ginny vanVleet.s~
The City Council is requested
resignation.
Ginny works part-time in the Building Department.
Ginny lost her babysitter so she will have to retire.
We have advertised for a replacement.
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
MOTION BY
, ) TO
I
~c""""""""'"''
"":":~:}1',
"'F "
,r:r ';:~
, - :ii jf
,J ,;
~'~.~~/"';>
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
November
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
:!J/.
Admin.
James E. Schrantz
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the attached Vacant Land
Purchase Agreement for the purchase of land for Fire Station #3.
This purchase is part of the Fire Bond issue.
Attach: Bill Hawkins letter
Purchase Agreement
MOTION BY
"- TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
, "
\.J
')
..,--/.
LAW OFFICES OF
HllrKe nnd JlnwKins
JOHN M. BURKE
WILLIAM G. HAWKINS
SUITE 101
299 COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD
COON RAPIDS. MINNESOTA 55433
PHONE (61 2l 764-2998
October 15, 1991
'/'"I'D'"
j' i
... I
1;
1 7,1991 I. .'
il{{ ~.I; lV
......~..,.".-..,.._.,._'- ---.-,......-.-.. /
CITY OF MDo',;~:.r~
Mr. James E. Schrantz
Andover City Hall
1685 Crosstown Blvd.
Andover, MN 55304
Re: Fire Station Purchase
Dear Jim:
Enclosed please find a purchase agreement that has been signed
by William and Phyllis Norlund for the sale OT the fire station
site. Would you please have this placed on the City Council
agenda for review and approval.
~'Y'
William G. Hawkins
WGH:mk
Enc.
cc: Mr. Bob Peach
,vII Form No. 1617.1(11..11901
MllIlIl-O,vla legal Forms
'!
VAcANT lAND PURcHASe AGREEMENt
This fonn approved by tha Mlnnasola Association of
REAL11JRS" MlnnasoCa Association of REAlJOR~
dIsclaims sny liability arising out of use or misuse of this term.
1. Date September 23, 1991
2. Page 1 of Two ( 2 ) Pag..
,'.
'\
;,.J
a RECEIVED OF the Ci tv of Andover
4, the sum 01 One Hundred and no/ 100 ---------------------~-- DoIla.. ($ 100 00 )
5. by CHE~KlIam<.. earnest money to be deposfted upon eccepIance of Pun:_ Agreement by .n pertleS, on Of before the MXI
6. buol"""".;;;;n.,recceplai1ce,~iIi~~~!l.ll~~lI~llllldl~
7. sll~ SaId eamest money Is part payment b- the pun::hase of !he property Iocaled aI:
6.
9. Oty 01 Andover , County c:A Anokn , Slalll c:A M'1I1l1<lSda.
1U Iega!fy described as: The North 330 feet of the West 330 feet,,6[ the South nalE of the Northwest
11. Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 32, Ran~e 24, Anoka County. Minnesot
12. Wrlng !he IJIbMng ~ W any, 0M10d by Seller and located on said properly: an gruOOn bulbo, ~ sIrubs and treos; M<l aI90 the IoIIowlng
1a personal property: on e
14."; c:A which property Seller has this day agrood 10 sell 10 Buy9I' for !he sum c:A: Twenty Thousand and no/lOa ----';----
15. --------------------------------------------------------------- ~ 20,000.00 )'~
16. which Bu)<< agroo!' I:J pay In !he foIk1Mng manner. Earnest money c:A $ 100.00 and $ 19. 900 . 00
17. cash on or beI:Jm November 1. 1991 !he date c:A dosing, .lh'6WlSilImmXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
16.~~lOOldI~~~ltX
19. ~
20. SPECIAL COtmNGalClES: This F'urcha.e Igreement Is su~ 10 !he loIk1Mng contingencies and W !he foI1oMng contingencIeS chocIold below
21. ~ be salIsIied or waMld. In wrltlng, by Bu)<< by ---'!2Y..ember 1 , 1931-, this F'urcha.e I'\)mement shall belrlne null
22. and \dd. and an eamest money sI1aII be re!unded 10 !he Buy9I' 8uy9I's and Selie<s agree b slgn a ~ c:A !he F'urcha.e /lgr99menl
23 (Select appropriaIe O!>>:>ns a.h)
24.~*lI~~1llt&~~~'Ql)\IIl\~~mHKlWIX
25. XX~XXXXXX
26~~~;a:~~llilillll\ll~llMlf(llit~~~
-fI:*o*"""-
'0. ~:(Ji~~;a:1Iil\IOOf~lI/(~~~Ii~JI,l(~Jlmf\l!l:t~X
-l<*do_-
28.~~~:ac~U~~Y<ll~~X
-fdo::lIt......--
28.[!i~~~~JI<Wl;~~,~~~~~X
-f(iolit(nOj-
:n [!i'(lj{~~tiUYt)ll1J!.'W1Ki:l~~~~;O:~~'\Kl~l\&YlW\~~
31. XXXlr.1\/M/lliJ1PI*WX --...- .'
32.~:ac~~1>W1\iOO~~~i:(W~~r./{.
:n XXXW~/rniij~X
34, Il\I (11) O1lJER: Approv~l hy ,hp Andover City COllnd 1
35-
35.~~~~~XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
'31. Seller grant<; pennlsslon c:A access I:J !he property b- lesling and sUlVOying purposes.
3ll PltAsE Nan:: Bu)<ll' may Ircur Irl:trtlonaJ c:hatges Irnp<mIng !he property Including but oct tm1tOO l:r. Hook-up andlJr access cIwgaS, tiU11c1pal
39. charges. cools b- _ access, stubbing access, water access, parl< decflCation, road access, utitrty connection and conneding reoo. curb cuts
4(l and tree pIanIing cI1arges.
41. 10 lhe besl c:A !he Sellel's Ia1cmIedge there Il19 r<> hazardous ~, abandoned mI1s, or underground slnrage tank;. ~ as h9reln ndad.
42. SPECIAl WARRAtmES: Seller wanants thai !he property described In this F'urcha.e ~ <:onslsls d
4a 2.5 AcREs ~n;EnM~~
44. Sl\IIiJ1(~jII$li1y~~m.'~~IW!Jfi\llfJ{:oocx.
45.SIlD{l{~jl~lOOIlI9:!..~lWNOIX~lillJQ:4J!~III$.X
46. AItad19d Il19 _ lrl:lenda which Il19 made a part c:A this I'un::hase Igroomenl. (E- page or pages on line 2)
: )
, -
47. bEEOiMARKETABLE TtT1.E: Upon parIormanoe by Buy9I', Seller shall deliver a
46. 10 by spousa, II any, c:orr.ooyIng rnarl<stlhIe titIa, su~ 10:
49. (AI BuildIng and "",Ing a...", ordinances, _ and feder.lI regulations; (B) Restridions mIaling b use at ~ d !he prnporty v.ithoui 9I!octf",
sa foi1eItura prcMsIons; (q R~ c:A any minerai rights by !he Slalll c:A Mlnneroa; (0) UtIlity and drainage _ which do oct Ii1Iill1<lrn
51. with _ng ~; (E) Rights oIlenanlll .. follows (unless spocllied, oct subJect 10 lenanc1es):
52.
sa (F) Others (Must be specIfIerlln writing):
M lTitl: & EXAMINATlON: Seller shall, \'IIthln a raasonabIa time alIer """'~ c:A this ~ furnish an abstract c:A titIa, or a regislerod
55. property abslract. oortilied I:J daI9 10 include proper searches CCMlring bankruplcies, slale and faderaJ ~ and liens, and I<Med and pending
55. spoda/ 'S 5: S S rrerlls. Bu)<< shall be _ 10 business days a1l9r racel~ c:A abstrad b- examination c:A title and making 8rfj otjedlori! which
57. shaI be made In writing or deemed waMld. II any olJiectIoo is so made, Seller sI1aII have 10 business d"", from ~ c:A BtJ;<ll'a _ title
56. ~ I:J ncIIty Bu)<< c:A SeIIer.s lolantlon tJ maJqo title __ with" 120 days from SeIIer.s race/p( c:A such _ olJiectIoo. II octlce Is
59. giYen, paymllnls tierauOOer required shall be postponed pending correct'oo c:A litle, but upon corradlon c:A Iitla and within 10 days a1lar W11lliin octlce
00. I:J Bu)<ll' !he parl!os shaD pertorm this F'urcha.e /lgroomant acoording 10 Its tanns. II r<> such octlce Is given or W octlce Is given but title Is oct
61. CIJ!T8d!>:j within !he Ume prcMded b-. this I'm:hase ~ shall be null and \dd, aI opIlon c:A Elu}<<; neither party shaft ,be tl8bla b- damages
62. heralmder I:J !he _ and eamest money sI1aII be refunded 10 Elu}<<; Buy9I' and Seller agree to slgn canceIIal10n c:A F'urcha.e Jl(Jraerner1l Bu)<<
63 ~ 10 IlCCllJ1 an cmner's title poIJcy In !he full aroourt c:A !he pun::hase price In t"", c:A an abstrad c:A title II !he property Is subject I:J a _
64. abstrad or W r(l abstrad c:A title Is In s.iner's possession or control. 1IBu)<< Is 10 racelYa such policy (1) !he title examInation 'pertod ShaiI COl.O.,., oee
65. ~ Buyor's raceIpI c:A a CUl11lrC title Insuranoo commitment and (2) Soller sI1aII pay !he entIra premium b- such policy II no lender's boIIcv Is
66. <da!nod, and 00y !he addiIlonaI oast c:A cbalnlng a simunanaously Issued """",'s porocy W a Ieoder'. porocy is oUaIned ~ shall pay !he Premfum
67. b- !he Iender'. poIIcy).
Warmrrty oood joined
re Seller .rd BUl'n' Initin!:
m....\IlJ'A.l(""'l
Seller ~~P1
Onln 10, (- 710.__
Dn19
~.~
~)
.~/ "".
>-,:,
_l_/-;~,
~ ~
'-~ !:;
~ ~
~\\,'l'}
\ ,I
"'''''_~~''""",''-"!;1io_j'!i~,,(.iilir!;F
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE November 5. 1991
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
ITEM
NQ Approve DNR Permit/
L30? Meadows of Round Lake BY: Todd J. Haas
Information regarding this item will be available
Council is requested to authorize the City Administrator to sign
the permit.
C( ~~1T10N BY
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
_....~>",;-'#~';'.'f;;"'..
,,('~,', ""'\
~ ~
~) 'd,~
~ ~
.-- ~{ If
,) \ j
"";~i."'r~~*""'j~*~it:-"
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Non-Discussion Items
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
November 5, 1991
ITEM
NO.
.....3.3 .
Approve Change Order/
91-4
BY: James E. Schrantz
A~~ Rl VuE'O:KOR
AG N A
\-,
BY:)
/
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
The City Council is requested to approve the change order to
project 91-4 Hills of Bunker Lake 4th Addition to construct the
storm sewer necessary to control the pond elevation on pond "C".
See the report in the packet.
The developer has agreed to the plan we will meet with the
property owner around the pond. We will meet with them before
Tuesdays meeting.
4 houses were built lower than was approved on the grading plan.
This plan (change order) isolates this pond from the rest of the
system.
John Davidson will be at the meeting to explain and answer any
questions the Council may have.
COUNCIL ACTION
./
"
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
';"'L;"!>';''';':''~'"""",,-
') (rA'~)
~ ~~ I
\~':_~... .."i'#";f'~'f:Y
......'fIiI,I.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
November 5, 1991
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO., J
JL/.
Approve Change Order
#6/Fire Station
James E. Schrantz
::~OR
/
Non-Discussion
Admin.
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the attached change
order for Project 90-26, Fire Station 1 & 2.
Bob Peach has reviewed this change order.
,. ) MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
OCT-25-91 FRI 14:36 BONESTROO & ASSOCIATES
P.02
"-
1~=rDD Owner City of Andover, 1685 NW Crosstown Blvd, Andover, MN 55304 Date October 24, 1991
Nt MderW< & Contractor Mnertens-Brenny Construction, 8251 MaIn Sf NE, Mpls,MN 55432 Change Order No. 6
/f AJsocUllU
r ~.:....-=- Bond Co. Alexander &. Alexander, Attn. Meredith Shinn, PO Box 1360, Mpls, MN 55440
CHANGE ORDER NO. Ii
Andover Fire Station Nos. 1 &.2
M.B Project No. 863
rue No. 17130
De.'lCtIption or Work
Contr.aej Vall 1'otaJ
No. lltm VnIt QII4IlUly Price A1l10\lll1
Change Order No. 6
1 Supply & install flat plate between
stairway & bloelc wall to close the gap.
Paint to match stairway. ADD LS 1 195.00 195.00
2 Additional grading &. sod at Sta. No. 2.
Culvert supplied by county was shorter
tban proposed. Need to shape a ditch
Dear the county road. ADD LS 1 670.00 670.00
3 Sod boulevard in areas where there arc
sewer &. water utilities per Dave
Almgren. Also sod swale south of Sta.
No.1 to prevent silt from entering
wetll'illds. ADD LS 1 2,120.00 2,120.00
4 Conncct power to garbage disposal &.
range hood in kitchen. ADD LS 1 139.86 139.86
S Install 2la lay in fixture in shower to
provide light behinti shower curtain. ADD LS 1 245.00 245.00
6 Move the truck fill line from center of
of Lbe Apparatus Bay to west end of the
Dorth wall as located by Bob Peach. ADD LS 1 904.00 904.00
7 Install hot &. cold water piping for
/ '\ washer & gas piping for dryer in
,.-/ Room 108. ADD LS 1 310.00 310.00
17130.CHA
CO.1
OCT-25-91 FRI 14:36 BONESTROO ~ ASSOCIATES
P.12I3
f ""
,
\.--/.),
U<rn
Villi
Conlrllrt
QUo.llll11
Unit
Prlco
'I'olAl
AnlollDl
8 Furnish & install street address numbers
for each rlU station on each bldg, ADD LS 1 576.00 576.00
9 Furnish and install "louch bar" device
al Door 10tF in Apparatus Room of Fire
Sill. No. 1 in lieu of panic bar & exit
button specified. ADD LS 1 681.00 681,00
Total Change Order No.6 $5,840.86
Original Contract Amount
Previous Change Orders
This Change Order No.6. ADD
Revised Contract Amount (including this Change Order)
$
1,037,391.00
63,424.95
S,840.86
1,106,656.81
$
, -.........
\.J
17130.CI-IA
CO.2
OCT-25-91 FRI 14:37 BONESTROO & ASSOCIATES
~J
Recommended for Approval by:
BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK& ASSOCIATES, me.
Approved by Contractor:
MAERTENS- BRENNY CONSTRUCnON
DistrihlJriQll
1 . Owner
1 . Contractor
1 Engin~r
1 . BODd Co,
"-
,
'-J
17130.CHA
CO.3
P.04
Approved by Owner:
CITY OF ANDOVER, MN
Date:
,,'...--......
~~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Hu v <::wu<:: l " . 1 'I'll
~
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
35
ITEM Approve CO/Final
NO. Pymts/Tankers 8&9
Bob Peach ~
Bond Coordinator
APPRI~~ED ~R
AGENC' 1\
BY, 1V /
V
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY:
The following change orders were made to Tanker 8 at the
pre-paint inspection and Tanker 9 at acceptance. The balances
are reflected in the bond bUdget received under Item 19, noted
under TRUCKS NOTE 1.
A motion is needed to authorize Alexis Change Orders dated
10-15-91 on Job Orders 1489 and 1488 as presented.
A motion is also needed to approve the final payments to Alexis
for the following:
Tanker 8 - $49,906.48
Tanker 9 $ 925.00
$50.831.48
) MOTION BY
'-,-
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
TO
SEP 12 '91 15:10 FROM ALEXIS FIRE EQUIP.
PAGE.002
(.J
INVOICE
9/12/91
Andover Fire Department
1685 Crosstown Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
FIRE APPARATUS CO.
Account #AN24
Job #1489
Date: September 12, 1991
ITEM DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
Per the contract #1489 (6x4) balance due for
One (1) Alexis Tanker. Account as follows:
Original Bid
Deduct for 6 unit purchase discount
Original Contract
Less early chassis payment
Chassis payment
Up grade chassis to 2554 w/270HP
engine.
Preconstruction Conference
(1) Add front compt each side.
(2) Rear 4" nst x 5" adapter with
30 degree elbow & blind cap.
(3) Three (3) part white scotchlite
stripe.
(4) Rear full width stainless steel
hand rail.
Change Order 4/12/91 with Don Clarey
Change Order 3/27/91
Change Order 8/28/91
BALANCE
$88,050.00
($ 2.500.00)
$85,550.00 0 .,0_
C? .
($ 1,600.00) _)0
($44,365.00)
$ 2,481.00
$ 1,200.00
$ 125.00
$ 1,000.00
$ 150.00
$ 350.00
$ 2,154.00
$ 1.676.48
DUE $48,721.48 -r
II 8 5"". ~ W19o(;,. C{l
Rtl2~
Co. Pf'eceived Andover Fire Dept.
.~,)
9-1.:1- ()/
DATE
DATE
P.O. Box 549 ·
109 E. Broadway ·
ALEXIS, IL 61412
~ 1-1~
.
(309)482.6121
.
FAX (309)482-3235
** TOTAL PAGE.002 **
"J
,~-)
P.O. Box 549
Andover Fire Department
1685 Crosstown Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
FIRE APPARATUS CO.
INVOICE
10/16/91
Account #AN24
Job #1488
Date: October 16, 1991
ITEM DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
Per contract #1488 balance due
for changes made to 4x4 Tanker
on October 11, 1991.
*
109 E. Broadway
Change Order 10/15/91 $925.00
TOTAL DUE $925.00
*
ALEXIS, IL 61412
*
* (309)482.6121
FAX (309)482-3235
.. .--_._-------_._----~,-.._------_._.__._--
~
c.J
ALEXIS FIRE EQUIPMENT COMPANY
SALES CHANGE ORDER
PAGE 1
DATE:
October 15. 1991
JOB NUMBER: 1489
CUSTOMER: Andover. Minnesota
.')
',./
Contract Description Of Change $Pdd $Subtract
~ To~ "From
Add 4, 30 candle power lights beneath
the body wide step on the rear.
Switch to be located next to deck light
switch under the step. $240.00
Delete white Petersen light in rear. ($75.00)
Add 4 rectangular Weldon lights, 2-red
used as stop/tail/turn and 2-white
used as backup lights. These will be
placed inside body panels on the
rear of the truck. The 2 remaining
red Petersen lights will be mounted
vertically on the rear compartment
1 each side used as stop/tail/turn. $480.00
Put drains in reel compartment. N/C
Move Q28 siren to the left 19" N/C
Put 2 lights in rear compartment
1 over each divider. N/C
Put a lip in bottom of fol-da-tank
compartment. made of aluminum
angle. N/C
Put automotive style latches on each
end of fol-da-tank compartment inlieu
of rubber straps. (see W.B.) N/C
Add 4 chrome "0" style handles on
fol-da-tank compartment. Put drain
holes in each end of compartment. $240.00
, "
'-~
,~-)
Add plastic coated chains to blind
doors.
Add a cover over the batteries.
Add 2 lights in pump compartment
same as used in other compartments
to be switched with pump panel.
Add chrome lug nut covers.
TOTALS
NIC
NIC
$200.00
$gge.oo
$100.00
I :2. (,0, 00
$Z,OBO.()(} ($75.00)
, 8-;,00
NET CHANGE TO CONTRACT
Authorized Customer Represe~tative: Isl
Sales Representative: Isl i)tU--.1t.f_ ~ 0ff1,j.JA" --47'1- ~~r'/
I I
Approved By Officer AFE: Isl
A/,?,
/
~)
:~)
DATE:
ALEXIS FIRE EQUIPMENT COMPANY
SALES CHANGE ORDER
PAGE 1
October 15. 1991
JOB NUMBER:
1488 (4X4)
CUSTOMER: Andover. Minnesota
Contract
Description Of Change
$ Pd:l
$Subtract
Add 1 2-1/2" tank fill with 2-1/2"
Techno Check valve.
$550.00
Add Iighthood with 2-30 candle power
lights over gauge panel.
Add double spring slide retainer on
lid for front bumper compartment.
Add Chrome lug nut covers.
$200.00
$75.00
$100.00
TOTALS
$925.00
Sales Representative:
Approved By Officer AFE:
:< ~ ~ ra
U g: 0
- 9' ~
,~ ::f
~. ~
,... ~
~ ~ ~
l ~ ~
~ I
~
I
~ ~
II:
~
~
~
..,
~
I
~
~
i
I'll
IIlf~
'I ~~'I
If I III
P ...
B 0
lr
:r
I ~ .
8
I"
I'
I'
"
II
II
II
U!
Ill~ H
;~i
...
n
i
..
...
~
n
...
o
z
ROUND LAKE BLV~ _________
'--,.-- - -
r---
tJ
::t C
C .... ::u
~ -
r- :t
r- >
:> ~
,--- --
::E:
:> ::u
l!:~ ~ -
N ()
m ~
;J
~
() <
0
r-~ S 0
n1i'l ~
it-
:;..
r:
Q
-f Q) :>
c ~ ~, ~ :D
-f ~ ~ tJ
-f, ~ :a:
r- m
m 0:1 '" :D
()
-
:E r-
0
- :D
() =m
~ :t
N :::12
- -f OJ
m m
z z
D
0 :; :II
0 It) 0
::: cO
~ !!!%
> -
m )>
m c
:D
-t ...::
N T
0( r Z
:e e -c ~~
- CD
0,
"
-
II
11
II
[I
/I
I /1/
-
-----
~ba.....
lO:>"Z~IL I
00"086'1 $
PI
OO"OZL'LZ$
lO'l/lSOJ
SlCYJ 10 l~qmnN
lSOJ p~ss~sSV
"p~SS~SSU ~q VSW ,{q p~put1J lOU SlSO:> lUql s~p~old Sl~~llS
p!V ~lUlS Iudp~nw 101 kl!{Od lu~mss~ssu AlD ~1U. :S.1N3.WSS3.SSV (I3.S0dOHd .Ill
19.Zf:6'f:6Z$
l::lM::lS llilOlS puu qm:> ::ll::ll:>UO:> ql~ l::l::lllS ::lp~ ,Zf:
:.1S0;) J.:)3.fOHd .11
"SP1UPUUlS P!V
~lUlS [Ud~:>~nw ql!^\ ~:>Uup10:>:m ll! l~~llS sn:>OlJ 10 lS~M l~~1 O~E Ol (6 "ON .H"V"S.J)
p1uA~InoH ~)[tr[ puno'H mOlJ "A\"N ~utr[ ql891 10 UOn:>lUlSUOJ :SJ.N3.W3.AOHdWI '1
1661 '~ l~qm~AoN
ZSlLl .oN au.!!
VJ.OS:!INNIW 'IDIAOCINV
N-16 .ON J.:)3.fOHd
.I.NIDWAOHdWI J3ffi1J.S .A\.N 3.NVI HJ.891
DNllIWH J.N3.WSS3.SSV
m ()
. CD
"1\ 3: Z :r
m ::j -< "1l
- ~ ~ r- r- oof
.. % 3:
0, c m
~ <00 E >
~~ CD CD
<;: 9& Z9~
~ .~ 0
Z
..., ~ -------
Z Z "0
~ c..
~ z .
. r;: "1\ 1=
! VI 0 iii
~ > r- "1\
C iii~
;; sa' r- ...
0; 0 C
~ ~ CD
~
...,
B !:t
" ~
." ~~
0
.. 0 XO.:!
~ c
Z ...~
z
~ NOS10 '3
...,
!:t
l>Z S
va~VO
z
~
tr
LZ
ONlaA~
01
WOOSNV
Z ...
---
I 1
o
l('
D
i"
5'
-
:!I .
" ~
C
~
...,
N
'"
8
..
o
o
z
;gl.~C~
.. .
'"l' ~~il'~
Jr" -0.-:.
1 ~ ~~~ t
..} ~;rG""
;=. :,. 8
i:
lO:l'OSIL 1
OO.S90'E $
l!UOIlSO;)
It
Sl!Uil JO J::lqmnN
:S.LNtIWSS3SSV a3S0dO~d 'III
OO'S99'SZl$ 'lS ulI!nQ ~ 'lS MOnUMs '.A\.N ::lutrJ ql6SI
:~SO;) .L:::>3fO~d .11
.qJn:l IDJ::lq snolJ!UInl!q
lit U ql!^\ '::lP!^\ l::l::lJ tZ 'glI!:luJJns snOU!mnl!q JO S::lq:llI! OMl pUU ::lsuq ::llug::lDffiu JO
S::lq:llI! JnoJ ql~ P::lPnJlSUO:l ::lJ::lM SAUMpUOJ::ltU. .COZ puo~ .\luno;)) 'A\'N ::lnu::l^V
lSI9I JO qlnos pUU .A\.N l::l::lJlS ::lIuglI!lqg!N JO lS::lM U::lJU ::lql U! 'l::l::lJlS lI1I!nQ pUU
'l::l::lJlS MOnUMs '.A\'N ::lutrJ ql6SI JO uO!l:lnJlSUO;) :S.LNtIW3AO~dWI a3S0dO~d .J
1661 's .I3qW3AON
OSlL 1 .oN 3H.'I
VJ.OS:!INNIW 'H3AO<INV
01-16 .ON J.:)afOHd AJJ;)
SJ.N:nwAOHdWI J3IDI.LS
'J.S NNIfll) <INV '.J.S MOTIVMS '.M'N W1N:ilAV IIJ.6S1
~NnIWII J.N3WSS3:SSV
j 1
I ~,......,
J, ~~f;l
1 Cl
2
" I'll g
~ "
0 [
~
0 :;
..
It lD
Q, CIl
2! (;
~
0 3
~
3 CIl
CIl II
It IE
IE It
..
It
..
0
...
0 <0
CIl
en
-
0
0 :IE
>:0: ~
~'<
C-"'tI 0
o ... ...
< 0 <
CD_.
... CD .CD
.
s:: 0 z
-
5. z :E
::I P
CD .
en. CD :Q
0 .... CD
- ,
lD .... 0 ~~
0 #'C:;
::l
en ~
-
... ~o
c
0
- ~')
0 'I-
~
~
-<
"
n
:t>
r.
no ~ ~~ co - -
00 ':5. :5.
3. IOn
3 .. rUt ~:::! e ~ i
.3::
.. ....0
...~ X... "'z 1: - -
"n ..=i~ I, It .. 0
...:r 1'''" ;:; C Ut ::t ~ 3
,..... ... 0 :; ~ ~ ~.
as CD ::0
CD CD ., z z
... :t> ., ~ 0
e lii
.., . ;;: ~ ~
.po ~
!! f r ~ ~
z i . ICI ,.,
. 0
? . i lii
l ~
.... I .
lO:l'SP1L 1
00.Z6Z $
lZ
OO'Zn'9$
l!UO/lSO;)
Sl!Un}O l~qwnN
lSO;) p~ss~ssy
.p~ss~sm ~q VSW Aq p~pun} lOU SlSO:l lBql S~P!AOld Sl~:UlS PrY ~lBlS
IBdp!unW lO} klrrod lU~WSS~SSB At!;). ~lJ.L :S.LN:tlWSS~SSV ([~SOdOHd 'ill
SE.LES'661$ :l[lllA\~P!S pUB 'l~A\~S WlOlS 'qm:l ~l~l:lUO:l ql!A\ l~~llS ~P!A\ ,ZE
:J,SO;J J.;JarOHd "n
'SplBptrnlS PrY ~lBlS IBd!:l!unW ql!A\ ~:ltrnplO:l:lB lI!
(SI HVSJ) plB^~lnOH UA\OlSSOl;) Ol (9tl .ON pBO'H Atuno;)) pm^~lnOH 1}J[tr!
l~J[UllH mOlJ .M.N 1}^!lG UA\OlSSOl;) }O UO!PtUlSUO:lI}'H :S.LN:tlW3AOHdWI "I
1661 's l~qWI}^ON
8NLl .ON 31M:
VJ,OS:iINNIW 'IDlAOGNV
1-16 'ON J.;J:n'OHd
NOIJ.:)llllJ..SNO;JmI rnmLLS
',\\N 3AllI([ NMOJ,SSOH;J
~NIlIWII .LN:tlWSS~SSV
CITY OF ANDOVER 05-NOV-19
LIST OF DELINQUENT WATER & 06:21:31
SEWER CHARGES TO BE
CERTIFIED TO COUNTY AUDITOR
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT TO BE
NUMBER PIN # SERVICE ADDRESS CERTIFIED AMOUNT
-------------- ---------------- ----------------------- --------- ---------
100-0011-00-00 33-32-24-43-0026 2730-133RD LANE NW 64.94 52.8
100-0030-00-00 33-32-24-43-0044 2720-134TH LANE NW 129.88 105.6
100-0038-00-00 33-32-24-34-0061 2820-135TH AVENUE NW 97.42 79.2
100-0043-00-00 33-32-24-34-0058 2844-135TH AVENUE NW 94.46 76.8
100-0047-00-00 33-32-24-34-0056 2860-135TH AVENUE NW 64.94 52.8
100-0060-00-00 33-32-24-31-0009 2940-135TH LANE NW 129.88 105.6
100-0078-00-00 34-32-24-24-0011 2105-138TH AVENUE NW 129.88 105.6
100-0089-00-00 33-32-24-14-0010 3754-172ND LANE NW 188.92 153.6
100-0094-00-00 33-32-24-14-0022 2526-138TH AVENUE NW 377.86 307.2
100-0101-00-00 33-32-24-13-0017 2605-138TH AVENUE NW 259.78 211. 2
100-0102-00-00 2619-138TH AVENUE NW 129.88 105.6
100-0104-00-01 33-32-24-13-0037 2735-138TH AVENUE NW 100.36 81.6
100-0118-00-00 34-32-24-22-0032 2232-139TH AVENUE NW 94.46 76.a
100-0144-00-00 33-32-24-12-0048 2659-139TH LANE NW 97.42 79.2
100-0154-00-00 34-32-24-22-0048 2230-140TH AVENUE NW 119.92 97.5
100-0209-00-00 33-32-24-11-0039 2539-140TH LANE NW 67.90 55.2
100-0228-00-00 33-32-24-21-0020 2814-141ST AVENUE NW 67.48 54.8
100-0230-00-00 28-32-24-34-0055 2867-141ST AVENUE NW 94.46 76.8
100-0249-00-00 28-32-24-34-0038 2904-142ND AVENUE NW 32.48 26.4
100-0252-00-00 28-32-24-34-0030 2917-142ND AVENUE NW 35.42 28.8
100-0253-00-00 28-32-24-34-0036 2926-142ND AVENUE NW 94.46 76.8
100-0276-00-00 28-32-24-34-0012 2949-142ND LANE NW 35.42 28.8
100-0298-00-00 34-32-24-21-0064 13929 NIGHTINGALE ST NW 94.46 76.8
100-0333-00-00 34-32-24-24-0032 13788 QUINN ST NW 22.74 18.4
100-0356-00-00 34-32-24-21-0009 14016 QUINN ST NW 64.94 52.8
100-0373-00-00 34-32-24-22-0017 13917 UPLANDER ST NW 97.42 79.2
100-0385-00-00 33-32-24-11-0022 13945 YUKON ST NW 97.42 79.2
100-0388-00-00 33-32-24-11-0019 14013 YUKON ST NW 32.48 26.4
100-0413-00-00 33-32-24-34-0048 13319 EIDELWEISS ST NW 94.46 76.8
100-0419-00-00 33-32-24-31-0029 13558 EIDELWEISS ST NW 32.48 26.4
100-0479-00-00 33-32-24-32-0018 13468 HEATHER ST NW 129.88 105.6
100-0486-00-00 33-32-24-32-0024 13548 HEATHER ST NW 64.94 52.8
100-0526-00-00 33-32-24-33-0030 13429 JONQUIL ST NW 94.46 76.8
100-0554-00-00 33-32-24-14-0017 2511 BUNKER LAKE BLVD NW 64.94 52.8
100-0594-00-00 33-32-24-13-0024 13818 CROSSTOWN DRIVE NW 94.46 76.8
100-0606-00-00 34-32-24-22-0007 14041 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW 132.84 108.0
100-0622-00-00 33-32-24-12-0011 13926 NORTHWOOD DRIVE NW 31. 24 25.4
200-0009-00-00 32-32-24-43-0012 3422-135TH AVENUE NW 141.70 115.2
200-0013-00-00 32-32-24-43-0010 3442-135TH AVENUE NW 53.14 43.2
200-0014-00-00 32-32-24-43-0009 3443-135TH AVENUE NW 53.14 43.2
200-0024-00-00 32-32-24-42-0056 3432-135TH LANE NW 67.90 55.2
200-0028-00-00 32-32-24-42-0020 3501-135TH LANE NW 141.70 115.2
200-0044-00-00 32-32-24-42-0041 3413-136TH AVENUE NW 48.70 39.6
200-0045-00-00 32-32-24-42-0047 3420-136TH AVENUE NW 146.12 118.8
200-0055-00-00 32-32-24-42-0032 3521-136TH AVENUE NW 141.70 115.2
200-0079-00-00 28-32-24-34-0070 2938-141ST LANE NW 141.70 115.2
200-0082-00-00 28-32-24-34-0061 2967-141ST LANE NW 150.56 122.4
200-0087-00-00 29-32-24-43-0025 3437-141ST LANE NW 141.70 115.2
200-0100-00-00 29-32-24-43-0032 3543-141ST LANE NW 141.70 115.2
200-0110-00-00 3458-142ND AVENUE NW 146.12 118.8
200-0131-00-00 29-32-24-24-0012 3635-145TH AVENUE NW 146.12 118.8
200-0164-00-00 32-32-24-24-0008 13835 UNDERCLIFT ST NW 48.70 39.6
200-0168-00-00 29-32-24-31-0051 14278 UNDERCLIFT ST NW 146.12 118.8
200-0172-00-00 29-32-24-31-0039 14318 UNDERCLIFT ST NW 168.00 136.5
200-0188-00-00 29-32-24-31-0053 14279 VINTAGE ST NW 141.70 115.2
200-0191-00-00 29-32-24-31-0050 14299 VINTAGE ST NW 146.12 118.8
200-0194-00-00 29-32-24-31-0025 14328 VINTAGE ST NW 114.52 93.1
200-0235-00-00 29-32-24-31-0077 14349 XENIA ST NW 141.70 115.2
200-0245-00-00 32-32-24-24-0011 13758 ROUND LAKE BLVD NW 53.14 43.2
200-0255-00-00 29-32-24-31-0009 14288 ROUND LAKE BLVD NW 146.12 118.8
201-0046-00-00 32-32-24-43-0066 3535-133RD LANE NW 397.74 323.3
201-0047-00-00 32-32-24-43-0067 3547-133RD LANE NW 99.00 80.4
201-0061-00-00 32-32-24-44-0028 2491-134TH AVENUE NW 311. 66 253.3
201-0093-00-00 32-32-24-43-0086 3559-134TH AVENUE NW 288.32 234.4
201-0146-00-00 33-32-24-41-0041 2435-136TH LANE NW 72.88 59.2
201-0148-00-00 33-32-24-41-0040 2449-136TH LANE NW 237.64 193.2
201-0183-00-00 34-32-24-24-0072 2122-137TH LANE NW 169.26 137.6
201-0320-00-00 34-32-24-23-0014 2303-138TH LANE NW 349.08 283.8
201-0365-00-00 32-32-24-13-0049 3446-138TH COURT NW 335.56 272.8
201-0407-00-00 32-32-24-14-0037 3310-139TH AVENUE NW 87.62 71.2
201-0423-00-00 32-32-24-12-0035 3479-139TH AVENUE NW 260.82 212.0
201-0488-00-00 32-32-24-21-0034 3640-139TH LANE NW 206.25 167.6
201-0496-00-00 32-32-24-21-0069 3706-139TH LANE NW 132.69 107.8
201-0540-00-00 35-32-24-21-0051 1358-140TH AVENUE NW 144.59 117.5
201-0651-00-00 27-32-24-34-0071 2083-141ST AVENUE NW 38.30 31.1
201-0690-00-00 27-32-24-34-0036 2196-141ST LANE NW 316.54 257.3
201-0698-00-00 27-32-24-33-0032 2326-141ST LANE NW 51. 59 41. 9
201-0747-00-00 27-32-24-34-0005 2153-142ND LANE NW 156.97 127.6
201-0766-00-00 29-32-24-42-0053 3571-144TH AVENUE NW 228.61 185.8
201-0798-00-00 26-32-24-22-0073 1500-147TH AVENUE NW 66.92 54.4
201-0825-00-00 26-32-24-22-0049 1490-148TH AVENUE NW 78.36 63.7
201-1017-00-00 35-32-24-21-0027 13907 BLUEBIRD ST NW 63.57 51.6
201-1034-00-00 26-32-24-31-0021 14296 BLUEBIRD ST NW 63.22 51. 4
201-1115-00-00 23-32-24-33-0065 15065 CRANE ST NW 446.38 362.9
201-1145-00-00 26-32-24-22-0023 14754 EAGLE ST NW 58.18 47.3
201-1154-00-00 26-32-24-22-0026 14841 EAGLE ST NW 148.24 120.5
201-1239-00-00 34-32-24-23-0032 13763 RAVEN ST NW 253.76 206.3
201-1258-00-00 34-32-24-23-0021 13890 RAVEN ST NW 75.89 61.7
201-1315-00-00 34-32-24-23-0034 13777 SWALLOW ST NW 25.02 20.3
201-1406-00-00 33-32-24-44-0024 13438 WREN ST NW 197.80 160.8
201-1503-00-00 29-32-24-41-0026 14460 JONQUIL ST NW 133.22 108.3
201-1518-00-00 29-32-24-41-0017 14411 KERRY ST NW 283.36 230.3
201-1535-00-00 29-32-24-14-0015 14525 KERRY ST NW 254.18 206.6
201-1565-00-00 32-32-24-44-0058 13380 WEST MARIGOLD COURT 279.60 227.3
201-1660-00-00 32-32-24-41-0009 13574 ORCHID CIRCLE NW 342.67 278.5
201-1690-00-00 32-32-24-13-0052 13821 QUAY ST NW 199.42 162.1
201-1700-00-00 32-32-24-12-0066 13983 QUAY ST NW 319.90 260.0
201-1714-00-00 32-32-24-13-0028 13872 ROSE ST NW 240.92 195.8
201-1727-00-00 32-32-24-13-0021 13841 SILVEROD COURT NW 145.36 118.1
201-1732-00-00 32-32-24-13-0023 13853 SILVEROD COURT NW 230.98 187.7
201-1748-00-00 32-32-24-12-0055 14001 SILVEROD ST NW 357.82 290.9
201-1757-00-00 32-32-24-12-0059 14059 SILVEROD ST NW 282.76 229.8
201-1784-00-00 32-32-24-21-0014 14018 UNDERCLIFT ST NW 90.81 73.8
201-1789-00-00 32-32-24-21-0011 14036 UNDERCLIFT ST NW 313.80 255.1
201-1843-00-00 32-32-24-:-22-0036 13970 YUCCA ST NW 136.35 110.8
201-1893-00-00
201-1929-00-00
201-1934-00-00
201-1936-00-00
201-1950-00-00
201-1978-00-00
201-1987-00-00
27-32-24-31-0008
33-32-24-42-0022
33-32-24-42-0025
33-32-24-13-0069
29-32-24-13-0004
29-32-24-42-0023
29-32-24-14-0026
14351 CROSSTOWN BLVD NW
13657 HIDDEN CREEK DR NW
13693 HIDDEN CREEK DR NW
13761 NORTHWOOD DRIVE NW
14516 ROUND LAKE BLVD NW
3447 SOUTH COON CREEK DR
14605 JONQUIL ST NW
176.17
365.80
303.01
283.45
252.36
260.33
222.14
143.2
297.4
246.3
230.4
205.1
211. 6
180.6
17,261.77 14,033.8
,
CITY OF ANDOVER 05-NOV-199
LIST OF DELINQUENT STREET 06:54:14 P
LIGHTING CHARGES TO BE
CERTIFIED TO COUNTY AUDITOR
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT TO BE
NUMBER PIN # SERVICE ADDRESS CERTIFIED AMOUNT
-------------- ---------------- ---------------------- -------- ----------
201-0046-00-00 32-32-24-43-0066 3535-133RD LANE NW 49.42 40.18
201-0047-00-00 32-32-24-43-0067 3547-13 3RD LANE NW 17.44 14.18
201-0061-00-00 32-32-24-44-0028 2491-134TH AVENUE NW 50.97 41. 44
201-0089-00-00 32-32-24-43-0045 3552-134TH AVENUE NW 45.07 36.64
201-0146-00-00 33-32-24-41-0041 2435-136TH LANE NW 20.66 16.80
201-0148-00-00 33-32-24-41-0040 2449-13 6TH LANE NW 87.18 70.88
201-0181-00-00 34-32-24-24-0070 2094-137TH LANE NW 46.97 38.19
201-0182-00-00 34-32-24-24'-0071 2108-137TH LANE NW' 46.97 38.19
201-0183-00-00 34-32-24-24-0072 2122-137TH LANE NW 46.97 38.19
201-0184-00-00 34-32-24-24-0073 2136-137TH LANE NW 46.97 38.19
201-0185-00-01 34-32-24-24-0077 2158-13 7TH LANE NW 46.97 38.19
201-0186-00-00 34-32-24-24-0076 2170-137TH LANE NW 46.97 38.19
201-0188-00-00 34-32-24-24-0075 .2182-137TH LANE NW 46.97 38.19
201-0242-00-00 35-32-24-23-0042 1424-138TH AVENUE NW 33.19 26.98
201-0310-00-00 35-32-24-23-0031 1522-138TH LANE NW 20.85 16.95
201-0320-00-00 34-32-24-23-0014 2303-138TH LANE NW 33.36 27.12
201-0407-00-00 32-32-24-14-0037 3310-139TH AVENUE NW 15.69 12.76
201-0540-00-00 35-32-24-21-0051 1358-140TH AVENUE NW 20.85 16.95
201-0651-00-00 27-32-24-34-0071 2083-141ST AVENUE NW 1. 82 1. 48
201-0669-00-00 27-32-24-33-0081 2203-141ST AVENUE NW 14.12 11. 48
201-0690-00-00 27-32-24-34-0036 2196-141ST LANE NW 60.29 49.02.
201-0711-00-00 27-32-24-34-0075 2067-142ND AVENUE NW 14.12 11. 48
201-0713-00-00 27-32-24-34-0074 2079-142ND AVENUE NW 14.12 11. 48
201-0714-00-00 27-32-24-34-0077 2080-142ND AVENUE NW 14.12 11. 48
201-0715-00-00 27-32-24-34-0073 2091-142ND AVENUE NW 14.12 11. 48
201-0716-00-00 27-32-24-34-0076 2092-142ND AVENUE NW 14.12 11. 48
201-0717-00-00 27-32-24-34-0015 2103-142ND AVENUE NW 67.01 54.48
201-0719-00-00 27-32-24-34-0016 2115-142ND AVENUE NW 67.01 54.48
201-0731-01-00 29-32-24-34-0014 2045-142ND LANE NW 67.01 54.48
201-0732-00-00 29-32-24-34-0026 2054-142ND LANE NW 67.01 54.48
201-0735-00-00 27-32-24-34-0012 2069-142ND LANE NW 67.01 54.48
201-0737-00-00 27-32-24-34-0011 2081-142ND LANE NW 67.01 54.48
201-0739-00-00 27-32-24-34-0010 2093-142ND LANE NW 67.01 54.48
201-0740-00-00 27-32-24-34-0022 2102-142ND LANE NW 67.01 54.48
201-0741-00-00 27-32-24-34-0009 2105-142ND LANE NW 67.01 54.48
201-0743-00-00 27-32-24-34-0008 2117-142ND LANE NW 67.01 54.48
201-0744-00-00 27-32-24-34-0020 2126-142ND LANE NW 67.01 54.48
201-0747-00-00 27-32-24-34-0005 2153-142ND LANE NW 28.25 22.97
201-0766-00-00 29-32-24-42-0053 3571-144TH AVENUE NW 71. 67 58.27
201-0769-00-00 27-32-24-32-0023 2206-145TH AVENUE NW 109.48 89.01
201-0771-00-00 27-32-24-23-0024 2220-145TH AVENUE NW 109.48 89.01
201-0773-00-00 27-32-24-32-0025 2234-145TH AVENUE NW 109.48 89.01
201-0775-00-00 27-32-24-32-0026 2248-145TH AVENUE NW 97.29 79.10
201..,.0785-00-00 27-32-24-32-0052 2342-145TH AVENUE NW 109.48 89.01
201-0798-00-00 26-32-24-22-0073 1500-147TH AVENUE NW 7.86 6.39
201-0825-00-00 26-32-24-22-0049 1490-148TH AVENUE NW 7.86 6.39
201-0837-00-00 26-32-24-21-0009 1237-148TH' LANE NW 34.37 27.94
201-0891-00-00 09-32-24-41-0005 2569-168TH LANE NW 115.88 94.21
..
201-0894-00-00 09-32-24-42-0016 2686-168TH LANE NW 92.39 75.11
201-0895-00-00 09-32-24-42-0015 2762-168TH LANE NW 92.39 75.11
201-0922-00-00 05-32-24-32-0012 3847-176TH LANE NW 16.88 13.72
201-1017-00-00 35-32-24-21-0027 13907 BLUEBIRD ST NW 17.38 14.13
201-1034-00-00 26-32-24-31-0021 14296 BLUEBIRD ST NW 7.72 6.28
201-1051-00-00 26-32-24-31-0003 14471 BLUEBIRD ST NW 23.17 18.84
201-1115-00-00 23-32-24-33-0065 15065 CRANE ST NW 60.22 48.96
201-1145-00-00 26-32-24-22-0023 14754 EAGLE ST NW 7.86 6.39
201-1154-00-00 26-32-24-22-0026 14841 EAGLE ST NW 20.98 17.06
201-1239-00-00 34-32-24-23-0032 13763 RAVEN ST NW 41. 36 33.63
201-1258-00-00 34-32-24-23-0021 13890 RAVEN ST NW 8.34 6.78
201-1260-00-00 27-32-24-33-0075 14088 RAVEN ST NW 14 .12 11. 48
201-1263-00-00 27-32-24-33-0077 14096 RAVEN ST NW 14.12 11. 48
201-1264-00-00 27-32-24-33-0050 14235 RAVEN ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1266-00-00 27-32-24-33-0051 14243 RAVEN ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1268-00-00 27-32-24-33-0052 14255 RAVEN ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1286-00-00 27-32-24-32-0049 14343 RAVEN ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1287-00-00 27-32-24-32-0035 14354 RAVEN ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1288-00-00 27-32-24-32-0048 14357 RAVEN ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1295-00-00 27-32-24-32-0039 14414 RAVEN ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1297-00-00 27-32-24-32-0040 14428 RAVEN ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1298-00-00 27-32-24-32-0043 14429 RAVEN ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1300-00-00 27-32-24-32-0042 14443 RAVEN ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1339-00-00 27-32-24-32-0069 14305 THRUSH ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1342-00-00 27-32-24-32-0031 14415 THRUSH ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1343-00-00 27-32-24-32-0030 14431 THRUSH ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1344-00-00 27-32-24-32-0029 14447 THRUSH ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1345-00-00 27-32-24-32-0051 14454 THRUSH ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1346-00-00 27-32-24-32-0028 14463 THRUSH ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1348-00-00 27-32-24-32-0027 14479 THRUSH ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1349-00-00 27-32-24-32-0055 14486 THRUSH ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1381-00-00 27-32-24-33-0031 14135 UPLANDER ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1387-00-00 27-32-24-33-0013 14185 UPLANDER ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1389-00-00 27-32-24-33-0014 14211 UPLANDER ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1393-00-00 27-32-24-33-0016 14259 UPLANDER ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1395-00-00 27-32-24-33-0017 14283 UPLANDER ST NW 109.48 89.01
201-1406-00-00 33-32-24-44-0024 13438 WREN ST NW 63.71 51. 80
201-1459-00-00 33-32-24-42-0051 13606 BITTERSWEET ST NW 90.27 73.39
201-1462-00-00 33-32-24-42-0053 13630 BITTERSWEET ST NW 83.43 67.83
201-1463-00-00 33-32-24-42-0054 13642 BITTERSWEET ST NW 89.06 72.41
201-1464-00-00 33-32-24-42-0055 13654 BITTERSWEET ST NW 90.27 73.39
201-1465-00-00 33-32-24-42-0049 13665 BITTERSWEET ST NW 90.27 73.39
201-1565-00-00 32-32-24-44-0058 13380 WEST MARIGOLD COUR 47.97 39.00
201-1632-00-00 32-32-24-41-0019 13564 NARCISSUS ST NW 15.99 13.00
201-1660-00-00 32-32-24-41-0009 13574 ORCHID CIRCLE NW 95.82 77.90
201-1880-00-00 05-32-24-32-0008 17544 AZTEC ST NW 30.95 25.16
201-1929-00-00 33-32-24-42-0022 13657 HIDDEN CREEK DR NW 68.73 55.88
201-1934-00-00 33-32-24-42-0025 13693 HIDDEN CREEK DR NW 87.18 70.88
201-1936-00-00 33-32-24-13-0069 13761 NORTHWOOD DRIVE NW 15.72 12.78
201-1956-00-00 27-32-24-32-0034 2265 SOUTH COON CREEK DR 109.48 89.01
201-1957-00-00 27-32-24-32-0033 2277 SOUTH COON CREEK DR 109.48 89.01
201-1958-00-00 27-32-24-32-0032 2289 SOUTH COON CREEK DR 109.48 89.01
201-1961-00-00 27-32-24-32-0059 2317 SOUTH COON CREEK DR 109.48 89.01
201-1962-00-00 27-32-24-32-0060 2327 SOUTH COON CREEK DR 109.48 89.01
201-1963-00-00 27-32-24-32-0061 2337 SOUTH COON CREEK DR 109.48 89.01
-------- ----------
6,869.73 5,585.25
~/"."="'~''''''.
"' ."~-
,T' "."
.. ""
'.,"',.",." .~,
" .-,
. .-.
~~ ~
t ~
~ I
'\ /
~,~#/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
November 5, 1991
Discussion
Planning & Building
David L. Carlberg
David Almgren
ITEM
NO.
Variance - Kob's
First Addition
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to review the variance request
of Ken Kobs and make a decision as to the best remedy to resolve
the recent problem with the Kob's First Addition Plat.
REVIEW
The applicant upon grading the building pad for Lot 1, Block 1 has
discovered that because of encountering a considerable amount of
peat the requirement of the 150' x 150' building pad could not be
met. The actual pad at the most would be 80' x 150'. Also, the
area requirement of 39,000 square feet cannot be met. The length
of the pad would have to be extended 487.5 feet, which is nearly
80 feet longer than the length of the existing lot.
As previously stated, the applicant would like a variance to the
150' x 150' area requirement as specified in Ordinance No. 10,
Section 9.06a(3). The Council may wish to grant a variance to
Section 9.06a(3) or resolve the matter with one of the options
listed below. It should be noted to date that the City has not
granted a variance to the 150' x 150' buildable pad requirement.
Council Options
The following options are available to the City Council.
1. Direct the applicant to move the interior lot lines so that
Lot 1 would meet the required 150' x 150' pad. In moving the
lot lines on Lots 2 and 3 north, a variance would need to be
granted on Lot 3, Block 1 because it would fail to meet the
area requirement of 108,900 square feet (2.5 acres). The lot
would roughly be 1.75 acres. However, the lot still would
meet all other requirements of Ordinance no. 10.
It should be noted that the City has granted numerous
variances on the lot size requirement (acreage) in the past.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
Page Two
Kob's First Addition Variance
November 5, 1991
2. The Council, as stated above, may grant a variance to the
applicant and vary from the 150' x 150' building area
requirement. The Council in choosing this option, should
consider the ramification of granting a variance. As noted
earlier, a variance has not been granted to this requirement.
3. The Council may choose not to grant a variance which would
require the plat to be amended and the lot to be removed.
Staff Recommendation
staff recommends to the City Council that a variance be
granted to the applicant in accordance with option #1.
I
I . ....
I A. '6.'6 'OJ
, 185.95 _
I 1 _-----
~ I 1-....--
:1' \.... "
Z.~ 6 --- ~I'!l''!l!i
1>- \~~o..-... A. '!lIS}.!... AN E
,,- ~z..8\ L
-.' t'I fl.. _L_
" 1 ------
, , -- 6
~\ , 168 __......-Z75.~ 00\"
A (...---- 1>. Z60 '!lZ
.' ~ ."
J ,'1\: I
," : t I
,"" ! I I
....' : I I
! I I
, I
! I I
i I lit)
27.9"/ I 11'1
. .. 1 I'
'4"29" I, N
I lit)
I IN
I ,
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 1
oJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
T I
--____.J
::ton
......,.
~cD
C)on
It) CD
.....
'NTC;
fl 0 OlU.UU ". "',j
51.02_."..... ""'.1
-. ~ 1
. 'X 136.20 ........ .
---1;.;.----------- ,
:-'- ...~,~f._i8.-..-~ -..... ~
i~ NW ~
-~--
I
I
I
-----
,.'
/.
..... I
31.81/'.' :
Ra20.00 I
6091.07'19 I
I
I
I
I
I
CD'
.,. CD'
.,
..,.,
g,:,
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
134.2&
~
"1
~
flJ
I~~ 2-0
3
I ._
I E AS T I
L_____________________________________~
,,--- ---------- ----- ------- - -------------1
Ii 414.19 1
I, I
I I
I I
: 1
I: I
I i I
10 ., , I
jq IJ-77~ ,
10 C&> ..,.1
,- Itll
N .1
I 2 :,
I NJ
I I
I I
I ,
I! I
I! I
~, I
,~ I
8 '~"". I
. 'p N 004~'~OHE I
8 ~ I
- ,;>CL, II. 82'"',.......
r. ,. ~" E A 5 T ".",.-'
.... ~--- -------- ---------------~..j..
l I !
: I :
; i i
on on on
,...,... on
. '.j
~iii CD
Itl en en
- r ~
. i
o
o
o
on
I
,\
..' 408.39 ,----- -- -------------------"71.
/:,'~ ' 40a.39,....... I
,..... ~oo 81 N oo:;;;b:;:~"'." I
.<*10 0: .r
("'~ on, I ,
:\ 1~7.33 : 8
:~ I I l g
~ n____ -----LCA-ii-------- -T---J
~ :
~ .
o
1'1
Q..~
.1
E:
.4 S
E:
E:
i<....
M
IV
.......
....
431.74
,.
,
o
o
o
on
:=
k
-...'
1&1
a:
I-
en
C1.
oJ
=>0
1-1&1
oJ
...",
0>
<l
1&1 a:
z'"
:;
~
a:o
~z
Zen
lj<l
.....,/
fall
Sout
to t
alon.
Quar
of tl
Numb,
253.,:
diatl
aectll
paral
88 dl
Nortt
Quart
North
South
point
~.u
I
Have
use f
"" ~
~ ::
10\ 1&1
'.....
-. Z
N"
a-:C) 1&1..,.
co :r: ~.....
co- 1--
::>~
en
1&1
z'"
-~
oJ...
....
"-. 1&10
--..""'--.......
I ...../
CJ,
'....
'oJ
....
...J
I
,', NW. COR. OF THE S. 328.10
.' FEET OF THE NW. 1/4 OF
.'1 THE SE. 1/4
:: N88036'46"W
;:)
(:)
II)
......-. ...../
,
o
N
~
i 'c)
'I<)
en.
Itll<)
-'lC)
CD.
N'It
I
......N. LINE OF THE S. 328.IC
FEET OF THE NW. '1/4 OF
THE SE. 1/4
~ . <'. N 0-45'30HE
i~3 .'.... 48.40
SE. COR. OF THE NE.
nr TLfC' r,.. I...
8 39":;;::.:' ......, '"
..:.....::.:::::... / 1\\ ~~"::.: .
1/4 -..,., , .... ~~
. '-
In wi
K"nn"
State
Count,
The f(
husbu
--
Notary
My Con
I here
a carr
all mo
plat a
Willis
Minnes<
State ,
County
-
The fOl
Land Sl
\
",1&1
~~
......
......
00
~!..,.
:; ~
.~w
~Zen
Notary
My COI1lll
This pI
held th
Kenneth
,5: LINE OF THE
... 'NW. 1/4 OF THE
SE..1/4.
Examine,
Anoka Cc
41.91
S88-36'46HE
Taxes pI
/~~7>'~~"'"
;/( J\ \~
iI )i
H _/
:\ !
<\ it
\~ 1/
~. \~ -",r:.~?'
'~~.
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. - ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 - (612) 755-510C
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COPIES TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Howard D. Koolick, Finance Director
October 30, 1991
REFERENCE: Information on 1992 Tax Levy and Budqet
According to the County's Department of Property Tax
Administration, the truth in taxation notices will be
mailed to property owners on November 5, 1991. As you are
aware, the notice will show a 64.5% increase in the proposed
tax levy for the City. The notice will also show a weighted
average percentage increase. This amount is the increase
that taxpayers in the City will see if there are no changes
in valuations, no new homesteads and no changes in certified
levies by the City, County or school districts. For
residents in school district #11 the weighted average
increase will be 7.2% while residents in district #15 will
see a 6.6% increase.
In anticipation of questions from Andover residents, the
following information is being provided relating to
Andover's 1992 budget and tax levy.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The notices being sent by the county are mandated by state
law and the form is set by the state. The weighted average
increase shown is a misleading figure since changes in the
tax law will tend to increase taxes on lower and mid-priced
residential property faster than on higher-priced
residential, rental and commercial-industrial property.
Depending on which school district a property is in, 1992
taxes can be between a slight decrease and an increase in
excess of 18%.
The City levies taxes for General Fund operations and debt
service. While the City increased its tax levy 33.13% (from
$1,484,070 to $1,975,490), the majority of the increase is
to pay the principal and interest on the 1991 fire bonds.
TAX LEVY
The tax levy set by the City consists of two components.
The first, a General Levy, are taxes levied to cover general
operations financed through the City's General Fund. The
other component of the tax levy is the debt levy which are
taxes levied to make debt payments.
Each part of the tax levy is decreased by aids paid by the
state and fiscal disparity distributions to arrive at the
portion of the tax levy actually paid by residents. The
following is a summary of the levy and deductions for both
general and debt for 1991 and 1992:
1991 Tax Levy 1992 Tax Levy
General Debt General Debt
Certified Levy $1,364,215 $119,855 $1,467,044 $508,446
Deduction from Levy:
Homestead and Ag.
Credit Aid 323,611 28,431 298,388 103,415
Equalization Aid 48,336 4,247 38,936 13,494
Fiscal Disp. Dist. 278,954 24,508 181,873 63,034
Tax Levy $ 713,314 $ 62,669 $ 947,847 $328,503
Divided by Local
Tax Base 7,103,414 7,103,414 7,103,423 7,103,423
Tax Rate 10.042% 0.882% 13.344% 4.625%
Several aspects of the above data merit further discussion.
1. Total certified levy increased from $1,484,070 to
$1,975,490. This 33.13% increase is composed of
the following:
Increase in General Levy
to compensate for lost
Local Government Aid
Increase in Debt Levy
for Fire Department Bonds
Decrease in Debt Levy
for decrease in annual
payments
Total Increase
Amount
Percentage
of Total
Increase
$ 102,829
$ 415,407
20.92%
84.54%
$ (26,816)
$ 491,420
(5.46)%
100.00%
,
Certified ~eneral levy increased only 7.5% (from
$1,364,21 to $1,467,044), however, the tax levy
and rate show an increase of 32.9%. The reason for
this difference is that with higher debt levies,
the debt portion of the levy gets more of the
deductions since they are split based on the
percentage of the certified levy for each
component.
2.
3. Local tax base shows no increase due to rate
changes contained in the property tax bill passed
by the state earlier this year. The following is a
summary of the "old" and "new" rate structure:
Class Rates for Property
Taxes Payable in:
1991
Residential homestead:
First $68,000 of value
$68,000 to $72,000
$72,000 to $110,000
$110,000 to 115,000
Amount over $115,000
1. 0%
2.0%
2.0%
3.0%
3.0%
Rental property:
1 to 3 units
4 or more units
3.0%
3.6%
Commercial-Industrial
First $100,000 of value
Amount over $100,000
3.2%
4.95%
Vacant Land
2.3%
1992
1. 0%
1. 0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.5%
2.8%
3.5%
3.1%
4.75%
2.2%
1993
1. 0%
1. 0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.5%
3.4%
3.0%
4.7%
N/A
The effect of decreasing the rates on higher valued
residential, rental and commercial-industrial property is
transferring a greater share of taxes to mid-priced homes
(those homes between $72,000 and $110,000). Any growth in
the City's tax base from new construction is offset by the
loss from the decrease in rates.
TAX CAPACITIES
The following table shows a comparison of 1991 and 1992 net
tax capacity for a variety of residential properties. This
comparison shows that while the net tax capacity on all
residential property over $68,000 has dropped, the decreases
are much more significant once the property value exceeds
$110,000.
Property Net Tax capaci ty
Value 1991 1992 Decrease
$ 65,000 $ 650 $ 650 $ -0-
$ 75,000 $ 720 $ 700 $ 20
$ 80,000 $ 920 $ 880 $ 40
$ 90,000 $1,120 $1,080 $ 40
$100,000 $1,320 $1,280 $ 40
$110,000 $1,520 $1,480 $ 40
$120,000 $1,820 $1,705 $ 115
$130,000 $2,120 $1,955 $ 165
$140,000 $2,420 $2,205 $ 215
$150,000 $2,720 $2,455 $ 265
$200,000 $4,220 $3,705 $ 515
PROPOSED CITY TAX LEVY
The City increased actual
$1,484,070 to $1,975,490.
effect of this increase on
properties.
Property
Value
$ 65,000
$ 75,000
$ 80,000
$ 90,000
$100,000
$110,000
$120,000
$130,000
$140,000
$150,000
$200,000
dollars levied by 33.13% from
The following table shows the
a variety of residential
1992 Proposed Levy
General Debt
$ 86.74 $ 30.06
93.41 32.37
117.42 40.70
144.12 49.95
170.80 59.20
197.50 68.45
227.52 78.86
260.87 90.42
294.25 101.98
327.60 113.54
494.40 171.35
Increase
Percentage
Increase
64.50%
59.93
57.34
58.62
59.50
60.16
54.09
51. 69
49.88
48.46
44.41
General
$ 21.47 $
21.10
25.03
31. 65
38.24
44.86
44.76
47.97
51. 23
54.45
70.63
Debt
24.33
26.02
32.58
40.07
47.56
55.04
62.81
71. 72
80.63
89.54
134.13
The above data clearly shows that the majority of the increase is a
result of the increase in the debt levy caused by the fire bonds.
The increase in the general levy results from levying for the loss
of local government aid and the decreased aids as explained earlier.
The data also shows that the lower valued properties will bear a
larger burden of the increase.
ESTIMATED TAXES
As was mentioned earlier, the notice will give a weighted average
increase. In order to give you a more concrete idea of what the
proposed tax increases combined with the changes in rates will do
for a specific property, the following able shows estimated 1992
taxes and the increase or decrease from 1991.
~erty Located in School District ill
Wlt in Coon Creek Outside Coon Creek
Property Watershed Dist. Watershed Dist. School District U5
Value 1992 Increase 1992 Increase 1992 Increase
$ 65,000 $ 705 $ 85 $ 703 $ 84 $ 718 $ 115
$ 70,000 759 72 757 72 774 106
$ 80,000 954 76 951 75 972 119
$ 90,000 1,171 103 1,167 101 1,193 154
$100,000 1,388 129 1,383 127 1,414 190
$110,000 1,605 155 1,600 154 1,635 249
$120,000 1,849 113 1,843 111 1,884 196
$130,000 2,120 97 2,113 96 2,160 194
$140,000 2,292 83 2,383 80 2,437 193
$150,000 2,663 68 2,653 65 2,713 191
$200,000 4,018 - 8 4,005 - 11 4,094 181
As the data above shows, depending on the value of the
property, the increase can range from a decrease in taxes to
an increase in excess of 18%. While the weighted average
increase shown is around seven percent, the actual increase
on the property will be more if the property is valued
under $115,000. Conversely, those properties valued over
$115,000 will see increases lower than the weighted average,
except in School District #15 where the increase is high
enough to offset the a larger portion of the rate decrease.
1992 BUDGET
The 1992 General Fund budget shows an increase of $110,336.
On the revenue side, the increase results from the following:
Increase in tax levy
Less Estimated increase in aids
reducing tax levy
Inclusion of Comm. Development
Block Grant
Increase Local Revenue Sources:
Building Department Revenues
Establishment of Investment
Adminstration Fee for all
other City Funds
Increase in various fees
Decrease in Local Revenue Sources:
Court Fines
Transfer from the Admin. Trust
Miscellaneous increases/decreases
102,829
-38,841
47,723
32,813
24,600
4,575
19,000
Fund 26,700
-17,663
110, 336
.
As the above shows, the increase in the revenue budget was
accomplished by increasing local revenue sources and the tax
levy to offset decreases in some local revenue sources.
The General Fund expenditure budget also shows an increase of
$110,336. The increase is composed primarily of the
following:
Additional costs required to
operate and maintain new fire
stations
Additional costs required to
operate larger fire department
Community Development Block Grant
budget included in General Fund
Estimated cost of election in 1992
Increase in police costs charged by
Anoka County
Increase in assessing costs charged
by Anoka County
Operation of 4 new traffic signals
Elimination of seal coating and
cracksealing programs
19,510
32,153
47,423
13,586
15,150
6,789
5,100
-31,200
In addition to the increases as shown above, the City is
required to meet several state and federal mandates including
the new social security withholding, implementation and
maintenance of comparable worth relationships and the
required development of Kelsey Park to name a few.
The City, by increasing local revenues, has been able to
adopt a balanced and realistic budget without major
sacrifices in programs or services.
Prior to the November 21, 1991 public hearing on the budget
and tax levy, you will receive a more detailed budget and
explanation of the budget process and document.
AGENDA
;;; cC
nrErrr
~ "OV 4 1991 D
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS
,,-
Novemebr 4, 1991
7:30 PM
CITY OF ANDOVER
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Open Mike
POLICY ITEMS
4. Approval of Minutes
5. Receive Monthly Financial Statements
6. Approve Bills
PERMIT ITEMS
7. Weybridge (PAN 91-50)
8. Andover: Nightengale Ditch Maintenance (PAN 91-51)
DISCUSSION ITEMS
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
9. Receive Staff Report
10. Citizen Advisory Committee Report
11. Technical Advisory Committee Report
NEW BUSINESS
ADJOURN
C00'! CPEEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS' MEETING
October 28, 1991
-~! Soard of Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed District held
their regular meeting on October 28, 1991 at the Bunker Hills
Activities Center.
Present: Reggie Hemmes, Eldon Hentges, LuEllen Richmond, Paul
Williams, Bob Boyum.
Staff:
Tim Kelly, Ed Mathiesen, Harold Sheff
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:37 PM
? Approval of the Agenda: Moved by Hentges, seconded by
Williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
3. Open Mike: No one was present
Policy Items
4. Approval of October 14, 1991 Minutes: Williams moved to
approve the minutes, seconded by Richmond. Motion carried with
five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no
nays.
5. Financing Strategy: Kelly noted that this item was tabled at
the October 14 meeting. Kelly added that the process for
prioritizing projects is intended to focus discussion and Clarify
issues for the Board's final decision. Kelly then noted that the
process had been applied to all of the projects identified in the
comprehensive plan and 1992 budget. Richmond indicated that she
liked the approach but raised the question of whether all of the
considerations should be of the same weight. Kelly responded
that in the exercise all were considered the same weight. Boyum
expressed concern about applying the method to smaller
watersheds. Kelly noted that there was provision to address
ability to pay and that the Board has the authority to address
that issue. Boyum moved to send the draft to the advisory
committees. Seconded by Richmond. Motion carried with five yeas
(Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
6. Review of 1992 Projects and Notice for Mearing: Kelly
introduced the item noting that Harold Sheff has raised the
concern that for capital projects funded through 509, the
District does not levy. The District accounts for the cost of
the project in our budget, and then certifies the cost of the
project to the County. The County then levies for the project.
The implication is that the actual levy for 1992 would be reduced
by $80,743 if the projects are considered capital projects. This
difference would be levied by Anoka County. Kelly noted that he
would be meeting with the County Finance and Capital
Improvements Committee November 7 to explain the situation and
seek their support.
Kelly also noted that this requirement in 509 is geared toward
bonding for a project. Kelly noted that when other District's
are financing projects on a pay-as-you-go basis, they are not
using this middle-man system. On advise of council, however, the
District is pursuing this issue within the letter of the law.
Page 2. Coon Creek Watershed District - October 28, 1991
Kelly went on to note that the 1992 budget is an aggressive plan
to focus on needed maintenance in the District and that there are
budget options which would allow achievement of a majority of the
goals identified for 1992.
Hemmes then expressed concern about consistency with the
comprehensive plan and that none of the maintenance projects
identified for 1992 are identified in the capital improvement
portion of the approved comprehensive plan.
Williams suggested that the District amend its capital
improvement plan. Hemmes expressed concern about the sequence of
the amendment process in relation to the 1992 budget,
certification of levies and costs, and the message that would be
sent to the county.
Hemmes suggested that it would be prudent for the District to
rebuild the 1992 budget focusing on implementation of the 509
plan.
Boyum suggested that the budget process, the hearing process is
intended to provide for public input into the projects.
Richmond moved to direct staff to start the amendment of the
District's capital improvement plan by moving the maintenance and
repair projects identified in the comprehensive plan into the
District's capital improvement plan. Seconded by Boyum. Motion
carried with four yeas (Boyum, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams)
and one nay (Hemmes).
Williams then moved to post the cited projects for public hearing
on November 25. Seconded by Hentges. Motion carried with five
yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no
nays. The projects to be heard are as follows: Proj. 91-06:Sand
Creek: 117th Ave.; Proj. 92-01:Coon Creek: Coon Rapids Bld to
Egret; Proj. 92-02:Coon Creek: CSAH 242 to S Coon Ck Dr.; Proj.
92-03:Cedar Creek: Confluence to RM .8; Proj. 92-04:Coon Creek:
Rip-Rap at Egret; Proj. 92-05:Sand Creek: Rip-rap: Olive St.;
Proj. 92-06:Sand Creek: Rip-rap; Foley Bld; Proj. 92-07:Crooked
Lake Milfoil
Permit Items
7. Weybridge: Kelly introduced'the permit application noting
that the application was incomplete as submitted, that the
applicant had provided additional information just today that
staff had not had time to review, and that the applicant was
requesting special consideration for a portion of the project
because of concern about the weather and potential freeze-up.
Mathiesen reviewed the plans as presented and the additional
plans provided at the meeting. Jerry Windschitl then asked the
Board if he could grade that portion of the site between
Wintergreen and Xeon streets on the east and west and Andover
Boulevard and 143rd to the north and south. Williams raised
concerns about drainage from the site and connection with storm
sewer. Mathiesen also raised concerns about the proposed dry
pond to the east of Wintergreen. Hemmes moved approval of the
request to grade the site between Wintergreen and Xeon streets on
the east and west, and Andover Boulevard and 143rd to the north
and south, with the following stipulations and understanding:
1. The entire proposal is subject to review and modification when
the District Board reviews the application at its November 4
Board meeting; 2. The grading is done at the applicants own risk
and that modification may be required; 3. The development escrow
will be required before any work can be done on the site.
Seconded by Williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum,
Hemmes. Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Page 3. Coon Creek Watershed District - October 28, 1991
Discussion Items
8. Intro Policy on Ditch Easements: Kelly introduced the draft
policy noting that as the District becomes more developed private
ditches become incorporated into the storm water system and
maintenance becomes a concern if not an issue, and that there are
encroachments into the maintenance easements of these ditches,
resulting in conflicts that can impede or prevent maintenance.
Kelly also noted that the DRAFT pOlicy assumes an active role on
the part of the District, and that the down side of an active
role is the potential for refereeing between neighbors, or not
responding as quickly as someone would like. Kelly then noted
that Ed Fields was present and that Ed's concern is a good
example of the issue just discussed. Fields then explained the
situation on land he farms in Ham Lake and expressed his concern
that the District should have an interest in protecting the
integrity of private ditches. Boyum moved to have staff meet
with Ham Lake and other cities to clarify the issue and seek to
establish maintenance easements on private ditches. Seconded by
Richmond. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Boyum then moved to forward the draft policy to the advisory
committees. Seconded by Williams. Motion carried with five yeas
(Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
9 Administrative Permits and Letters of permission: Kelly
presented the issue of granting permission administratively to
minor or non controversial projects. Kelly noted that several
applicants have asked the District to explore an approach used by
several cities that allow administrative permission to clear a
site, or perform minor maintenance on a ditch. Kelly asked for
Board feedback. Boyum indicated the he supported the idea and
suggested a disclaimer that if there are problems or differences
with what is finally approved the applicant is working at their
own risk. Richmond stated that she saw no need for such a
program. Williams agreed with Richmond and noted concern about
the definition of minor and having staff in the middle of a
permit debate. Hentges supported the idea stating that it would
encourage people to come in for a permit on small projects and
consequently make open the lines of communication, ensure better
compliance and enable the District to better track and control
all of the activities occurring in the District. Hemmes noted
that Board notification should be required.
Informational Items
10. Met Council Presentation: Kelly noted that the
Metropolitan council has withdrawn its proposal for a fifth
metropolitan system and asked if the Board still wanted a
presentation from Met Council staff. Richmond said no. The
remainder of the Board concurred.
The meeting adjourned at 10:21 PM on a motion by Boyum, seconded
by Hentges. Motion carried with five yeas (Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Reginald A. Hemmes. President
. '
-- cc
G!
,'--
Anoka-Hennepin / I / ~7p:~
Community Education Department
2727 Ferry Street North
Anoko. MN 55303
(612) 422-5326
Dennis Carlson. Director
~~~~-~~~D
,....,
CITY OF ANDOVER
Date: October 29, 1991
To: City Representatives
~...fJ
From: Dennis Carlson, Community Education Director
Re: Fourth Draft of Joint Powers Agreement
I am enclosing the fourth draft of the Joint Powers Agreement for your review along with the
original document. It is basically a different document than the original. The essential
differences are: advisory council responsibilities and membership, basic service level
(responsibility of the school district), and the optional services (responsibility of the
municipality). We will review this agreement again at the regular Community Education
Advisory Council meeting on Thursday, November 7, 1991 (2727 North Ferry Street, Anoka) at
3:30 p.m. I hope you can attend as this will be our final meeting dealing with this document. If
you cannot attend please let me know. Thank you for your help.
City representatives are:
Jim Schrantz
Mark Nagel
Jan Ficken
Shirley Slater
Ryan Schroeder
Andover
Anoka
Brooklyn Park
Dayton
Ramsey
Anoka-Henneoin Independent School District No, 11
./ '-'
,0E-t:E11'-E~
1l/"ov 4 1991 D
,,-
CITY OF AND
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE COMMUNITY OVER
PROGRAM AND FACILITY USE (Fourth draft 10/16/91)
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
between the Anoka-Hennepin Independent School
School District and the Municipality of
Municipality) who are parties hereto.
day of 1991. by and
District No. 11 (hereinafter called
(hereinafter called the
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted by M.S. 471.59 and M.S. 121.85 to
121.88 (Subd. 1-5), the School District and several municipalities within said
district entered into a Joint Powers Agreement on , to
implement a Community School program within the participating communities,
in order to provide recreational, educational and social services to the citizens,
and
WHEREAS. the School District is committed to provide a basic level of service for
a Community School program for all residents of the school district regardless of
municipality of residence, which may include, but is not limited to, the delivery
and administration of youth, teen, and adult programs, facility use, and school
and community involvement. and
WHEREAS, the school district encourages each Municipality to provide
supplemental funds for optional services, which may include, but are not
limited to, the delivery and administration of increased levels of basic services,
summer program, key communicator. and joint use of school and municipal
facilities, and
WHEREAS, the parties thereto desire to make certain changes in said previous
agreement, and
WHEREAS, the parties agree that all previous Joint Powers Agreements are
superseded, by this agreement. and
NOW, THEREFORE, the Community School program is a program, entirely within the
Community Education department of the school district with all rights and
responsibilities pertaining thereto, except as provided within this agreement and
any optional service agreements, and
BE IT FURTHER AGREED, by and between the parties as follows:
Advisory Committee Responsibilities
A. The Community School Advisory Committee shall perform an advisory function
to the Anoka-Hennepin Community Education Advisory Council. Its major
responsibility shall be, but not limited to, the following :
1. Give direction and recommend policy, to the overall development of the
Community School program as it relates to District No. 11.
2. Recommend an annual budget for community school programs and service
levels as part of the district wide budget setting process.
B. Meetings shall be as needed, but no less than two times a year, and otherwise as
specified in rules and procedures.
C The Advisory Committee shall have no taxing power.
Community School Advisory Committee Membership
A. One member shall be appointed by the governing body of each partIcIpating
municipal governmental unit (Anoka, Coon Rapids, Andover, Champlin. Blaine,
Ramsey, Dayton, Brooklyn Park and Ham Lake).
B. One member each representing Elementary and Secondary Principals.
C Additional at-large members as agreed upon by the membership.
D. The Director of Community Education shall be an Ex Officio member.
E. The term of members and officers shall be for the calendar year. Members shall
be eligible for reappointment. The Advisory Committee shall elect its own
officers, in addition. shall adopt its own rules and procedures that are consistent
with the terms of the agreement.
Bud~et Development
A. The Community School budget shall set forth the proposed program of activIties
to be provided on a districtwide basis. and within each of the participating
municipalities and shall be reviewed annually.
B. The Director of Community Education shall recommend the Community School
program budget to the Community School Advisory Committee, which will then
make recommendation to the Anoka-Hennepin Community Education Advisory
Council. The Advisory Council will incorporate. the Community School budget
into the overall Community Education budget, and make recommendation to the
school board.
C The Director of Community Education shall submit, no later than June, the
proposed basic services for the following calendar year to each participating
municipality along with a proposed agreement for optional services to be
purchased by the municipality.
D. The municipality shall act upon the proposed agreement for optional services
for the following year no later than December.
E. Upon approval of the agreement for optional services, the municipality will be
billed for one half of the approved amount payable to the School District in
June, and the final payment shall be billed and payable in January not to exceed
the approved amount.
F. The Director of Community Education shall prepare an annual report. and/or
additional reports, as agreed upon with individual municipalities. These reports
shall include a summary of programs and services, participation and enrollment
data, and other pertinent financial data.
Ri~hts and Responsibilities
A. School District
1. The school district, through the Director of Community Education, or
his/her designee. shall administer the Community School program
including the basic services and optional services purchased by the
municipalities. All personnel under the Community School program shall
be considered to be employees of the School District and shall come under
the school district's terms and conditions of employment.
2. The school district shall fund 100% of the basic services.
3. The school district shall appoint two principals to the Community School
Advisory Committee.
B. Municipality
1. The municipality shall fund 100% of the optional services.
2. The municipality shall appoint one representative to the Community School
Advisory Committee.
3. Future employment or transfer of a Community School Coordinator or
Assistant Coordinator shall be done in consultation with the governmental
body within which the school is located and the Building Principal.
4. Specific personnel issues raised by the Municipality should be given to the
Community Education Director in writing for resolution within established
school district policies and procedures. The Director shall make his/her
best effort to bring the issue to resolution with the Municipality.
School and Park Facilities
A. Use of school facilities shall be in accordance with the administrative handbook
of the School District. Use of municipal facilities shall conform to policies
established by each governmental body.
B. Each governing body shall be responsible for the maintenance and repair of
their facilities. The Director of Community Education shall bring to the attention
of the appropriate municipal or school official items in need of repair or
maintenance and a suggested time when the maintenance might be performed
so as not to disrupt programmed activities.
C The construction of any new facilities shall be the prerogative and
responsibility of each governmental body.
D. In order to minimize duplication and thereby reduce costs. the parties are
encouraged to enter into supplementary maintenance agreements for each
project or facilities jointly used, taking into consideration sharing of staff and
. '
/
equipment, rental of equipment, joint purchase of equipment. etc., for park
development and maintenance purposes.
Liabilitv: Each party shall assume sole responsibility for injuries to users by its
facilities while the facilities are being used. Each party shall secure proper liability
insurance to provide for any such claim.
Lenith of Aireement and Termination: This agreement shall take effect upon
approval by the School District and the participating governmental bodies. It may be
terminated as it pertains to any of the parties by providing at least one hundred
eighty (180) days written notice to the Community School Advisory Committee. City
councils shall review the program annually and may increase or decrease their
individual, budgets for the Community School program.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement effective the
day and year first above written.
ANOKA-HENNEPIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICf NO. 11
By
Chairperson
Clerk
MUNICIPALITY
BY
Mayor
Clerk
. .
r;:: c (
I,' <,-
//-:.. .
///9/
CJet ober- ] 1 ~ 1 '=..~91
TO: i1avor and Council
FPfJ!"1 :
i3UB.JECT :
Beb Peach, FD Bond Coordinator
Activities of Seotember 26 through October 30.
.! {-'r-\.j
J."7""'! J.
THURSDAY. SEPTEMBER 26. 1991:
',.;jork DIl T.i.\nke~-' 9
Wor'~~ in Station #1
.q..5Ij(Jur-'s
10 l1\i'l e':
[~'J=;' I DA Y .
:,3EPTEt1BEP
";"f ..
Budget uodate
Time Accountinq
Station #2 irlsoection
Disc~jsS furniture with D. Reitan
Uod8te Ctl1e{ Smith
Discussions with Alexi5 regarding trucks
10.5 hour"=
~5 miles
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 28:
Check accuracy of bill for T8
Researcn furniture
2 hours
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 30:
Plan trip to Pierce
Review building and uodate
Budget update
10 hour";;
10 miles
TUESDAY. OCTOBER 1:
Buildin"ls inspections with Chief
Prepare material for Council
CClune: i"1 Meet inCl
12 ..~; hout-.s.
:-.c:::, m; 1 ~...-;
Mayor and City Couflcil
fJctDb~:::'r 31, i \J'91
Page :~
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 2:
Punch list insoection
Station #1 reV1SW
6 hOUlo-'S
T~~lJRSDAYq OCTOBER 3:
Tr'a\/el to F'ier'ce/Aopl ei:on, (>Jisconsin
Final inspection and dinner
1.8 hClur's
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 4:
Final acceotance/Aerial and Pumper/Pierce
fr3.ye'l
ShOt,,,-, truck
1"'-
... "-'
hours
SATURDAY. OCTOBER 5:
Training on trucks
~3 nOUf'S
20 mIles
SUNDAY OCTOBER 6:
,..Jork 011 trucks
4,~5 hour":
1U miles
MONDAY. OCTOBER
-'1.
; .
Coordinate dispatch room install/Anderson
Layout of heating system/Station #2
Work on Agenda materlal
4 hours
11 fa)-(
~ car phone calls
JU m i 0' es
Mayor and City Counci"l
October :31 ~ 1991
Pay!? 3
TUESDAY. OCTOBER 8:
Meet with Pierce instructor
Tr.:::\ining on !-5
Officers' meeting/update project
11 hour.::,
WEDNESDAY. OCTOBER 9:
Setup far radio install
Insoect Station #2
Agenda materi=<l
6..~; hours
25 In i 1 es
THURSDAY. OCTOBER 10:
Trio to Ale;{is./Ill in(Ji::,
Final Inspection. T.=<nker Q
Pre-oaint insoection, Tanker 8
14 hour's
FRIDAY. OCTOBER 11:
Pick UP T9 at Alexis
Trio to Andover
14 hour's
SATURDAY. OCTOBER
1'"":\ v
..l,,.;....
Check out T9
:] hours
MONDAY. OCTOBER 14:
Move Storage to Station #1 - Inventory
Meet ~ith Comoany 1
8 hours
?n milQ-:
Mavor and Citv Council
Uctober 31. 1991
Page 4
TUESDAY. OCTOBER 15:
Research cleaning supcl ies
Research hose washer
Council meeting
12.5 hours
15 miles
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16:
Meet with Brian Cotter/cleaning and janitorial suppl1e5
Meet with D. Reitan on ordering supplies
Research other vendors for supol ies
.7~5 hc)ur.s
10 mIles
THURSDAY. OCTOBER 17:
Review trucks with Chief
Continued research on janitorial supol ies
9 hours
FRIDAY. OCTOBER 18:
Ooen Station #1 for del iverv of supclles
Review Station #1 with firefighters
Continued research on janitorial suppl ies
5 nours
20 miles
SATURDAY. OCTOBER 1q.
Research janitorial suppl ies
Research and order furniture
Inventorv and serial izing hoses
10 hours
SUNDAY. OCTOBER 20:
Furniture orders
Set uo meetings of various committees
Insoect Stations #1 and #2
8.5
~~
L~
hours
milR~
Mavor and City Council
October 31, 1991
F:'ac:~e ::)
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22:
Move equipment from Station 3 to Station 1
Continued research and oreoare orders/furniture
"7 hours
15 miles
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER
...,~ fl
Ut"der i'ur'n i tUI'~e
Measur'e Stat irJn
Order Janitorial
1 and 2 for shelving
suppl ie'=
<:) hour-::;
J ,".
. ._1
mi"' e=:-
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 24:
Trip to Northtown/cick UP supp] ies
Change orders on Tankers 8 and 9
Two trios to Station #1/open for del iveries and instal is
DiscLlss colors for furniture
7 hOUt~'5
.+5 miles
FRIDAY. OCTOBER 25:
Correct orders for .janitorial supol ies
Order cabinets and files
Interview with Jim/newspaper
Hook UP air hoses
10 hours
20 miles
MONDAY, OCTOBER 28:
Prepare agenda material
High pressure sprayer/PCP Corporation
8.::i hours
45 miles
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 29:
Maintenance Suppl ies
Equipment at Station #1
"7 hour.;::;
Mavor and Cl-ty Council
October' 31 ~ 1991
F'3ge 6
WEDNESDAY. OCTOBER 30:
Move equipment UP stairs
Move eauipment to Station #1
PreDare order for sucDI iers
Final payment to Alexis
Ucdate of budget
Prepare Agenda cnaterial
8ft5 hours
30 hours
CURRENT ACTIVITIES -
Working on final izing Station #2/Final punch I ist imminent
Coordinating and organizing del ivery of Tanker 8
Researching and ordering remaining budget items
Install of communications equipment
Install of phone svstem/Station #2
Coordinate oreparation of fire trucks for service
Inventorv, verify bill ing, and install of all arriving
eouipment - numerous janitorial suppl ies, furniture,
shelving, vaccums, kitchen suppl ies, etc.
NeQotiating errors on orders
Uodating bond bUdget when buildings are final ized -- timing
is critical
Negotiating con+1 icting demands within the Fire Department on
remaining budget funds
About three-fourths of the budget is completed. with about
one-fourth remaining. I will be revising the budget upon
completion of the buildings to include administrative items. The
finalizing is running considerably behind schedule. Timing is
verv critical. There will be so much final izing to be done in
December, it would be impossible to stop until the project is
completed. Items ordered in October and November will be arriving
in December. A continued coordinated effort is needed to be sure
that the correct items are received and paid accurately.
Mv time spent on this project started around 30 hours a week but
is now exceeding 50 hours a week. and it is expected that time
commitment will continue to be needed in the I ight of work stil i
remaining,
J
o
o
REPORT
:1
LI
,J
I
IJ
I
: J
IJ
I
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
i
IJ
I J
I
J
J
HILLS OF BUNKER LAKE PONDS
POND C LEVEL CONTROL
ANDOVER, MINNESOTA
SEPTEMBER 19. 1991
COMM. NO. 9938-03
TKDA
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
612/292-4400
FAX 612/292-0083
,..,
u
"
u
IllLLS OF BUNKER LAKE PONDS
POND C LEVEL CONTROL
,...,
LJ
n
ANDOVER,MITNNESOTA
Li
,..,
u
Table of Contents
,..,
Background
L..J
'"1
LJ
General
Planning Process
Project Design/Construction
Building Permit Process
n
LJ
,..,
Findings
u
LJ
General
House Elevations
Water Surface Elevations
Pond Volumes
,...,
...,.
I
1...1
...,
I
Summary
LJ
...,
,
General
Options Reviewed
Recommendation
L.J
,...,
:...J
'"l
w
Tables
"l
L.J
1.
2.
House Elevations
100- Y ear Water Surface Elevations
'I
J Cost Estimates
...,
LJ
...,
LJ
-i-
9938-03
r;
L.'
roo;
;"J
Figures
r;
u
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
..,
..J
n
u
r"1
:-J
r;
u
...,
u
,...,
L.J
,.,
u
r'l
L1
...,
,
LJ
..,
L.J
'I
L.J
..,
~
~l
L.J
..,
u
...,
-J
~
C-J
Development Plan Pond/House Locations
Pond Volumes: Grading vs Actual - Pond A
Pond Volumes: Grading vs Actual - Pond B
Pond Volumes: Grading vs Actual - Pond C
Pond Volumes: Grading vs Actual - Pond D
-ii-
9938-03
,..,
L1
,..,
L1
IllLLS OF BUNKER LAKE PONDS
POND C LEVEL CONTROL
ANDOVER,NUNNESOTA
,..,
L..J
~
-..J
BACKGROUND
~
General
L..J
. T
Several homes in the Hills of Bunker Lake development are experiencing potential flooding
problems of their lowest floors. The situation was brought to the City's attention in the summer
of 1991 when observations by City staff and residents following wet conditions noted water
rising in Pond C of the development (see Figure 1) to within several inches of the lowest, walk-
out floors of several homes. Further study of the situation has noted the following:
LJ
"
u
..,
1.
The outlet to Pond C is approximately 0.65' higher than the construction plan (881.65 vs
881.00), due to conflict with sanitary sewer grades during construction.
w
,..,
u
2.
The homes around Pond C are constructed as much as 2.8' below the Grading Plan
Lowest Floor Elevation.
,..,
L..J
3.
Several homes around other ponds were also constructed lower than the Grading Plan.
. ..
L1
"l
Li
This report was prepared to clarify the existing parameters of the situation and outline potential
options for providing flood protection to these homes. All figures and tables are located at the
end of this report.
--,.
~
PlanniDl! Process
,..,
u
During planning stages, the developer prepared a Grading Plan for the site noting elevations for
the garage slab and lowest floor elevation for each lot. The lowest floor elevations were based
on existing and proposed conditions, and were related to meeting the following requirements:
.......
~
I
1.
Must be at least 1', preferably 2', above 100-year flood elevation.
u
2. Must be at least 3' above highest groundwater elevation (mottled soil).
,..,
L..J
The Grading Plan was the basis for all street and utility design.
-..
LJ
~
u
-1-
9938-03
...,
u
n
u
Project Desi~Construction
,...,
u
Based on the Grading Plan a TR-20 stormwater model was prepared. The model took into
account the following information from the Grading Plan:
r-;
LJ
..,
Existing Conditions
Pond Sizes
Land Use
Outlet Elevations
u
..,
L1
Proposed Conditions
Pond Sizes, Storage Ability
New Land Use
Lowest Floor Elevations
Pipe Grade Limitations
,...,
u
....,
u
....,
The model assumed that the development would occur as outlined in the Grading Plan. From the
model, recommendations were made on revising the Grading Plan where needed, and a fmal
design was completed. The outlet pipe from Pond C was redesigned during Final Design to
avoid conflict with the sanitary sewer. The pipe size was increased, the invert elevation was
raised and the aligrunent was changed to meet design parameters.
~.J
....,
u
....,
Buildin~ Permit Process
L1
':
;
When a particular lot is to be developed, the lot owner submits a house plan to the City Building
Official for review. The Building Official reviews the plans and makes corrections to meet
building codes and development plan requirements. The "lowest floor elevation" from the
Grading Plan is noted on the building permit. It is the builder's responsibility to verify that the
lowest floor of the house is built no lower than this elevation.
u
....,
L.I
~
u
FINDINGS
...,
General
LJ
Following discovery of the house elevation problem, TKDA completed a survey of house
elevations and pond volumes (grading plan vs actual), and remodeled the development to review
the effects of various options for addressing the situation. Although the Pond C area was the
focus of the survey, homes in other areas were reviewed to verify that these had been built to the
specifications noted in the "Planning Process" section.
'1
u
....,
;
LJ
,...,
u
....,
u
-2-
9938-03
,...,
L1
,.....,
u
House Elevations
,...,
1,..1
Table 1 notes house elevations of the actual low floor of 20 homes in the Hills of Bunker Lake
development. At least 11 of the 20 homes were constructed at an elevation below the Grading
Plan lowest floor elevation. Of these II homes, 7 homes were constructed with less than I foot
of free board over the 100-year elevation, and are considered to have a high potential for
flooding. lbree of the 7 homes are actually bdmY. the 100-year event elevation, and are
extremely high risks for flooding.
..
LJ
r.,
LJ
"
All homes which were built according to the Grading Plan are well above the minimum free
board requirements for existing, as-built conditions.
LJ
,....,
Water Surface Elevations
u
r'1'
Table 2 notes 100-year event water surface elevations based on the Grading Plan (design)
conditions and as-built conditions, as well as levels for Options I and 2. The results of the
modeling of as-built vs Grading Plan (design) elevations shows the following:
L1
~,
LJ
Pond A:
Pond B:
Pond C:
PondD & E:
Within .1' of design, difference is due to slightly smaller pond size.
.4' over design elevation, pond is substantially smaller than plan.
Within .1 ' of design, despite higher outlet elevation.
Same elevations, (Note: Proposed Pond "E" is assumed for as-built and design
conditions.)
.....,
u
'"""1
L1
"
l,..1
The results of this review clearly show the following:
1.
The original design parameters have been substantially met, except for pond volume.
..
LJ
2.
.N2 homes which were built according to the Grading Plan would be within 1.0' of the
100-year event under existing, as-built conditions.
"
u
Pond Volumes
-..
LJ
The attached figures show that the volumes of Ponds A, C, and D agree fairly closely with the
original design parameters. Pond B is substantially smaller than proposed and should be
enlarged to its originally designed size. Although not as critical as Pond "B" it would be
beneficial to also increase Pond A to the size shown on the grading plan.
.....,
u
,...,
u
.......
L1
,...,
u
-3-
9938-03
,...,
u
,...,
u
SUMMARY
..,
IJ
General
...,
As noted above, it appears clear that the problems encountered are directly related to the homes
being built substantially lower than the Grading Plan indicated they should be. This is by far the
most significant reason for the severe flooding potential of these homes. In fact, all the homes
noted would be well above the minimum elevation requirements even if the outlet pipe and pond
sizes remained the same.
L.J
,...,
u
...,
L.J
The outlet pipe from Pond C, despite being ahnost 8" higher than the construction plan, had an
insignificant effect on the lOO-year event elevation. The current 100-year event elevation is only
0.1' higher than original Grading Plan design.
,...,
u
....,
The size of Pond B should be increased to the size shown on the grading plan under any
circumstances. This would help both the downstream and upstream areas, as well as the Pond B
area itself.
u
...,
w
When the proposed business development bordering Pond C is developed, drainage for the area
should be designed to provide temporary ponding on the parking lots, which should then be
routed directly to Pond "B".
....,
u
,....,
Three of the 7 homes with a high potential for flooding are on Ponds A and B. These homes
must be addressed separately. 1358 140th Avenue has an extremely high risk of flooding and
should be immediately addressed.
u
,...,
L.J
Options
r 1
LJ
Two options were originally studied for reducing the potential for flood damage to existing
homes adjacent to Pond C. From these original options, two additional options were derived.
Cost estimates for each option considered are presented in Table 3.
'""l
:.J
"\
L.J
Option I:
Lower the outlet to Pond C as low as possible. Leave other conditions as is.
Option 2:
Isolate Pond C by connecting inlet and outlet pipes. Divert runoff from
upstream areas to Pond B.
..."
u
Option 3:
Construct a permanent storm water pumping station.
..,
u
Option 4:
Flood-proof the individual homes with the greatest potential for flooding.
....,
LJ
..,
u
-4-
9938-03
"
u
,....,
LJ
Option 1 was determined to be unfeasible, since it did not resolve the problems. Lowering the
pipe to 880.5 will only decrease the peak 100-year storm elevation by 0.3' due to the downstream
conditions. The water surface elevation would need to be lowered approximately an additional
0.5' just to get the 100-year storm elevation down to the elevation of the lowest constructed
floor. It should be lowered another foot beyond this elevation to 879.0 to provide a margin of
safety. As a result of the downstream conditions it would not be feasible to provide a gravity
outlet pipe from Pond C at invert elevation 879.0.
...,
LJ
...,
u
,....,
u
Option 2 involves the following:
"
LJ
1.
Reconstruct pipe from 138th Avenue to 139th Lane, connecting the inlet and outlet pipe
of Pond C.
...,
LJ
2.
Berm commercial area on the west, divert runoff directly to Pond B.
,....,
LJ
3.
Remove all outlets to Pond C to prevent backup.
..
u
4.
Construct an automatic pumping station to Pump Pond C levels down to 880.5 or lower
between storm events.
"
LJ
Although this appears to lower the pond levels more significantly, the 100-year event elevation is
still 0.1' higher than the lowest floor. For this option to work, it would require pumping Pond C
levels down to approximately 879.4 between storm events to allow for I' of free board during the
lOO-year 24-hour event.
~
Ll
"
Based on the results of models of Options I and 2, the following two additional options were also
considered.
L1
-.
LJ
Option 3:
Construct an automatic storm water pumping station (duplex) on Pond "C"
with sufficient capacity to keep the 100-year event elevation at least 1 foot
below the lowest floor elevation.
'I
LJ
...,
LJ
Option 4:
1.
Retain the existing Pond"C" outlet pipe as is.
-:
LJ
...,
LJ
....,
LJ
....,
u
-5-
9938-03
n
L1
,..,
<..J
2.
Flood-proof all homes with lowest floor elevations within one foot of the IOO-year
event pond elevation, in one of the following ways:
...,
u
A.
Eliminate the walkouts by blocking the doorway and fIlling the back yards to
slope away from the homes. Add footing drains and sump pumps.
"
LJ
n
B.
As an alternate to "A" -- retaining walls and landscaping could be used to
isolate and protect the walkouts rather than eliminating them. (Note: Interior
drainage of walkout patio's will also be needed.)
u
...,
LJ
3.
The City could then use its portable pump to pump down Pond "C" after major runoff
events and prior to winter freeze-up. (Note: The feasibility of utilizing a permanent
pumping station for increased reliability should be considered.)
...,
~j
...,
LJ
Recommendation
,....,
Implementation of Option 4 is recommended as the most cost-effective solution to the potential
flooding problems for the homes around Pond "C" which were built too low. In addition the
storage volume for Pond "A" and Pond "B" should be increased to match the grading plan.
L1
..
L1
.,
L1
...,
L1
"
LJ
"
LJ
.,
u
...,
L1
...,
L1
...,
Ll
...,
LJ
-6-
993!l-01
..,
w
,..,
u
,...,
u
,..,
u
..,
L.J
..,
LJ
,..,
LJ
..,
LJ
...,
u
..,
LJ
.,
L1
..,
u
..,
u
....,
L.J
.,
u
.."
u
..,
L.J
..,
L.J
....,
, ,
...
~
..:l
!Xl
-<
Eo<
tf.l
~
z
o
~
~
-<
..:l
~
~E::l
~~
n
gfi
.>
tf.lO
~~
~
~
..:l
~
~
tf.l
~
o
::r::
~
~~M~~ ~ ~~O~~~M~~~~
-d--d~do~~_~odod""N~""
'++ + + + +
a
s::
i
....
C1
U
E
~ ~
a 8 1a
tf.l .... G,)
~ ~ ~
~ ;> 0
~fi38
~o~o~~~~~o~o~o~o~~~~
MMMMMMMMM~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~oooo~~oo~~~~~~oo~~~oo~
oo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oo~oo~oo
*
"'1MMO"<l;~~~
""~~~M~~M
~~~oo~~oo~
0000000000000000
*
"<l;~~OC'!'.q"'1~~C'!~~
~\Ci~~MM~MMN~O\
oo~oo~~~oo~~~oo~
~oo~~oooo~oo~~~~
O\O\O\~O\O\~~~O\"<l;~"<l;~"<l;~~~~M
dddoddododN~N~NMMMM~
oooooooo~oo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~oo~~~~~~~~~~~~~oooooo~oo
!
J
<<<<<<<<<<~~~~lXlUUUU~
~~~~~~~~~~MMMMM~~~~~
~
s::31NM~~:::
M~~~~M~~~~M~~~....
......~.................('r) ..... ..-.
~J
i
0.31
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
...... ...... ..... ...... ......
NM~~
""M~~~~~~~~~NM~~O
..............................~ ("f"'} ......
: cii ri5
g ~ g G,) G,)
c:: c:: c:: .s .s
G,) G,) G,) ~ ~
<<<~~
o 0
-s-s-s==
J~~~~~
................OOM
~NOON
OO\~oo
MNN~~
..... ...... ...... ...... ......
..... * *
tf.l * *
c:: g g '0
G,) G,) G,) G,) ~ G,) c:: c:: G,) ~
jjjj~j~~j~
~;g;g;g~~:!Lg~ S
~~~~;;>M~~~U
.....................\0....................\0
O~~OM~~N~~
O\~~~O~~~O\OO
........................Vlr} M(1)("f")
...........................................................
-7-
* * *
* * *
~~
~~
M M
.... ....
~ ~
N_
~~V"l
.... -....
~
M
~
....
^
....
c::
G,)
;>
G,)
1a
~
I
o
o
....
bIl
;g
o
o
4:l
....
.B
a
-s
....
{h
:E
~
-a
:E
>,
]
~
~
G,)
~
"0
13
....
a
-s
.:
c::
G,)
;:-
G,)
1a
G,)
>,
I
o
o
....
C:l
o
....
~
;:-
G,)
-
G,)
s
'"
~
o
"0
.s
~
'"
'"
G,)
....
'-'
bIl
;g
o
o
4:l
....
.B
Cd
....
~
....
o
0.
-a
:E
~
-s
....
~
'"
G,)
s
o
::c
*
*
.s
J/
~
'"
s
o
..c:
"0
G,)
]
j
....
'"
G,)
~
o
....
'"
~
o
c::
G,)
o
*
9938-03
,...,
w
n
u
,...,
u
,...,
,
LJ
,...,
u
,...,
u
,...,
LJ
.....,
w
,...,
u
.-,
LJ
n
u
..,
J
"
L.J
1
LJ
'I
U
,...,
u
,...,
u
.....,
,
u
,..,
J
'"
d
z
W
..J
m
<I:
t-
en
o
z
o
c.
W
~
<I:
..J
0:
t-W
z~
WZ
>=>>
Wm
:eLL.
0:0
Oen
t-..J
cn..J
o:i:
=>>.
Oen
:E:Z
~O
"'-
o:~
<1:>
WW
>..J
.W
o
OW
"'0
<I:
LL.
0:
=>>
en
0:
W
~
3:
<I:
t-
O
en
W
z
Z
-
:e
~
0:
W
>
o
o
Z
<I:
Q)
o
<ll
1: .
::J C ....
(/) 0 <ll (\J
.- Q)
Qi 1ii >- g
..... > 1__
<llQ)0
>-0
>W......
Q)
o
<ll
1:
::J C ....
(/)o<ll..-
Qi~~ c:
- >0.-
~~o
>W..-
-
Q) c
o Q)c
~ dj<ll
::Jc"'o.
(/)o<ll
...:;::: Q) C
~~>;-:c
~~g~
>W......<!:)
Q)
o
<ll
1:
O>~MMM
ciC\iC\i~Lri
co co co CCllXl
co CO CO coco
O>~""'MM
ciC\iC\i~Lri
CO CO CO coco
COCO CO COCO
COOO>MM
ciC\iC\i~Lri
CO CO CO CO CO
COCO CO coco
O>~OMM
ciC\iM~Lri
COCO CO CO CO
CO CO CO coco
"C
C
o
<(alUOW
"C"C"C"C"C
ccccc
00000
0.0.0.0.0.
-8-
c
o
:;:::
<ll
>
Q)
a;
1ii
-
Q)
+::
::J
o
o
-
"C
Q)
E
::J
III
III
<ll
.!a
U
"C
c
o
0.
U
"C
C
o
0.
-
0-
Q)
o
x
Q)
III
"C
C
o
0-
m
...
o
-
"C
Q)
E
::J
III
III
<ll
~Q)
<ll~
Ill'"
cO
Ow
.. .
.- III
"g>
8~
_<ll
':; Ui
..o~
1'-
1Il::J
<ll..o
I
-Ill
......<ll
c~
0_
li'~
010
...ci
If~
.
Q)"S
~..o
I-
"C
'Q)
-ala;
+::"C
::J 0
o E
0_
Co
~c
~CIJ
~ <ll
"C~
Q)==
1iio
-c
o::J
.!a ...
"C >,-':"
Q)<llC
E"C .Q
. -
::J 0 0-
Ill...... 0
Ill... III
<ll <ll.-
1IlQ)=
.- >,
I ~
Uo:!::
"Co~
c......
OQ)U
o..c"C
-c
- 0
0-..0.
Q)Q)
00'"
Xz 0
Q) -
-C
III 0
"C 10 ._
C .-
00 <ll
O-CO >
COQ)
=Q)a;
<ll..o Q)
000
__<ll
"C"C1:
Q)Q)::J
EE~
::J::JQ)
1Il1ll1ii
1Il1ll~
<ll<ll:>
Q)IIl..ll:::
....- <ll
<ll U Q)
III 0-
C"CQ)
OC~
~O"'"
:co.Q)
C ... 0
00 ::J
o-"C
_Q)e
=00-
::J<llo
-91:_
1Il::J"C
<ll1llQ)
- ... t5
(\J~Q)
c<llO-
o~x
.- Q)
-0)
O-cQ)
o .- ..0
...tc
O~<ll
LL.1Il0
M
o
I
co
M
0>
0>
.
.
,....,
w
...,
w
COST ESTIMATE
,....,
L..J
Hills of Bunker Lake Ponds
City of Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 9938-03
,....,
u
.,
L..J
Option 1:
Option 1 was determined to be unfeasible. No cost estimate was calculated.
,.-,
Option 2: Option 2 requires a pumping station that uses two five-horsepower pwnps to
control the water elevation of Pond C.
u
.,
u
Item Unit
No. Description Ouantitv Price Amount
1 18" RCP a ill Storm Sewer Pipe 200.0 LF $18.00 $3,600.00
2 21" RCP a ill Storm Sewer Pipe 220.0 LF 20.00 4,400.00
3 Ditching 1,000.0 LF 10.00 10,000.00
4 Restoration 1.0 LF 5,000.00 5,000.00
5 Pwnping Station 1.0 LS 30,000.00 30,000.00
6 Portable Generator 1.0EA 15,000.00 15,000.00
7 Flood-proof Homes Next to Ponds A & B 3.0EA 7.000.00 21.000.00
Constroction Cost $89,000.00
+ Engineering, Contingencies 27.000.00
Total Constroction Cost $116,000.00
...,
w
,....,
u
,....,
u
....,
L..J
...,
L1
...,
:....J
...,
LJ
,....,
u
....,
,
u
....,
:....J
...,
LJ
....,
LJ
-9-
9938-03
,.,
LJ
...,
LJ
COST ESTIMATE
,...,
LJ
Hills of Bunker Lake Ponds
City of Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 9938-03
n
LJ
,...,
Option 3: Option 3 requires a pumping station that utilizes two ten-horsepower pumps to keep
the 1 OO-year event elevation 1 foot below the lowest floor elevation.
LJ
,....,
Item
No.
Descri.ption
LJ
...,
1
2
3
Pumping Station
Portable Generator
Flood-proof Homes Next to Ponds A & B
LJ
...,
LJ
,...,
Construction Cost
+ Engineering, Contingencies
LJ
.-,
Total Construction Cost
LJ
...,
LJ
..,
LJ
...,
LJ
"
LJ
...,
LJ
..,
;....J
..,
;....J
,...,
..J
...,
LJ
-10-
Ouantity
Unit
Price
1.0 LS
1.0EA
30EA
$50,000.00
20,000.00
7.000.00
Amount
$50,000.00
20,000.00
21.000.00
$91,000.00
27.000.00
$118,000.00
993!l-0l
,..,
LJ
...,
u
...,
COST ESTIMATE
u
n
Hills of Bunker Lake Ponds
City of Andover, Minnesota
Commission No. 9938-03
u
....,
LJ
Option 4: Option 4 requires that the existing Pond "C" outlet pipe be retained and homes with
low flood elevations within one foot of the 1 OO-year elevation would be flood-
proofed.
,..,
u
...,
Item Unit
No. Description Ouantity Price Amount
I Granular Borrow 500.0 CY $500.00 $2,500.00
2 Topsoil Borrow 550.0 CY 550.00 8,250.00
3 Sod 3,200.0 SF 2.00 6,400.00
4 Retaining Wall 1,000.0 SF 20.00 20,000.00
5 RemovelReplace Concrete Patio 7.0EA 1,500.00 10,500.00
6 Portable SUIIlP PUIIlP 7.0EA 200.00 1.400.00
Construction Cost $49,050.00
+ Engineering, Contingencies 15 000.00
Total Construction Cost $64,050.00
LJ
.....,
u
-,
L.J
....,
LJ
...,
L1
-,
u
....,
w
...,
L.J
....,
LJ
....,
u
....,
u
....,
LJ
'l
J
-11-
9938-03
...J
<t: z
w...l I- 0 ex:
ex: <t: ....
Z ~
~~~ w w w W
;: I- > >- ex:
w 0 w 0 :J
...J ~
<(1-0 en a.. W 0
,... lJ..
...lz ~ en :r: ex: z
ex: 0 C!)
a:offl 0 z 0 <t:
I- 0 :r: 0 :r:
woz en 0. :r:rr l-
t:;: ex:
~...l~ w
;:0 :r: z
::>w~ en ...J ~ 0
w :r: ~
CO > .. ~ C!) ;-
0 z >
u..~ffi :r: 0 z w
en 0 <t: ...J
W 0 :r: w
00> I- ...J I- ~
0 lJ.. en ex:
0 z ex: en 0
~oo w 0 W I-
0 lJ.. ...J en
...lZZ *
-0<(
:Co.
\.
-\-
~'
r<f
&
('0
-~
Z
"'Z
....J
_._----~
-
__J nJ~
\
,
...,
_..---
UJ
Z
2W
0::1:
ow
n:: _J
0"
'"
ex:
w
;:
w
en
~
ex:
o
ti;
7
m
r<1
m
Z
....J
:E
CJJ
'"
(\j
m
(ql H 'rfS :)) GAla tlnc;r.l"1H
o
w
en
o
a..
o
ex:
0.
U)
ci
0:
0
U
ci
:J
m
w
~
~t I-
_I ()
_J
0:
W UJ
~ UJI-
Z Wo
:J Z.J
m UJ U)
=>UJ
mw
o~
OUJ
o=>
I([]
n::....J
00::{
mn::
Iw
~z
'.Lllu
ZeD
" "
rnrn
~ ,. '.,
c:J C] c-:J c::::J c::::J c:::J c::J c::::J ' LJ CJ L-J C-.J C:J L-J ~ L.:...-3 c..J .1 c:J
...,
u
...,
L.J
POND A VOLUMES: GRADING VS AS-BUILT
FIGURE 2
...,
L.J
...,
L.J
...,
L.J
~,
L.J
...,
L.J
882
...,
L.J
~
~ 881
u..
z
0
t(
>
w 880
...l
w
...,
L.J
...,
d
...,
L.J
...,
....J
879
...,
LJ
...,
L.J
...,
L.J
...,
L.J
....,
L.J
,....,
L.J
....,
L.J
- -
, ,
,
. I , , : . ' ,
, ' ! , , ..'...
Ii , -
, ' . -'- -'-
I , -'-
, . , , ,
, '"
, ...- .r-
, , /: , /. I
, " f I
./ ./
, , . ./
./
: , -' ./
/ ./ ,
, './ -
, 1'r /.
I , ~'/
, , I , , /'
I , V ,..... ,
v ' ,
: , I / ... ,
I II' I , :
I I , I ,
i !.I'!'" , , , "
1)/ ' I , i
'~' , , I ,
ii, I ,
, , : I , ! ; ,
, I i I ,
, , , , I , .
, , ! : ' I I . I I
, , . I ,
, : , , , I . , , i ,
, I I , I, I . , , ' 1 ' ,
II , I , , 1 I
'. ,
, . , ,
o
5 10 15
VOLUME (AC.-FTJ
20
LEGEND
~ GRADING PLAN
,..k- AS-BUILT
,.
FIGURE 2
'1
LJ
.....,
.J
.......
POND B VOLUMES: GRADING VS AS-BUILT
FIGURE 3
u
,....,
u
.......
,.,
, , :
,~ I
,: :
: ,
I :
883 : . -
.'-
: . ./
./
. ; ./
I- ./
u.. '7 ./
./
./
Z ':- -,- ./
0 882
~ I ,/
.
>
w . ,~ ,...,.,
-J
W .
.
881 &Ji
I :~l
, ;:/
, ,
, v
,
u
u
eo
LJ
.....,
L1
.....,
LJ
eo
L..J
,...,
u
eo
""
879.8 17
o
, : '
, ,
: ,
L..J
.
5
I
10
I
15
,
20
25
...,
LJ
VOLUME (AC.-FTJ
....,
LEGEND
--e- GRADING PLAN
-/lr- AS-BUILT
-
L.J
....,
u
....,
u
eo
LJ
n
LJ
eo
FIGURE ::
LJ
,...,
'-.J
....,
u
POND C VOLUMES: GRADING VS AS-BUILT
FIGURE 4
....,
u
....,
u
":
LJ
....,
u
885
'\
L.J
'"l
u
884
-
I-
U.
Z
0 883
~
>
W
-I
w
882
...,
L.J
....,
L.J
...,
u
....,
L.J
..,
L.J
881
....,
u
....,
u
....,
u
....,
LJ
n
u
....,
I I
I
I '.
,
I
, . I
, . I ,
, , I ~ , ,
, , , ~ "
, . -= ~
I , . , ..- ...,
7
; ~':;i ,7 ,
I . j , .
,
/IV ,.....
,
, ''-
I
. ' .-
I , . , , . ,
I I, j ,
I ./ ./ . , , .-
I , ./ . -
./ ./ , ; .
, ,/ I
./,./
, /
,..,. , I
I-
I
, , ,
, , I ,
, , ,
, I , ,
, , ' I
, , I , i
~ ,
I , , i
, , , ,
F/ I , , ,
F' , . , ,
FE ,
. -
I ~
i
i ,
,
I I I ,
o
1
2 3
VOLUME (AC.-FTJ
4
LEGEND
~ GRADING PLAN
-/lr- AS-BUILT
..-
FIGURE 4
'l
I
L.J
,...,
L.J
POND D VOLUMES: GRADING VS AS-BUILT
FIGURE 5
...,
u
.....,
u
...,
LJ
...,
LJ
886
...,
LJ
,...,
LJ
885
-
l-
LL
Z
0 884
~
>
W
...J
w
883
...,
L..J
...,
u
.-,
LJ
...,
u
...,
LJ
882
...,
u
...,
LJ
,...,
u
...,
L.J
...,
LJ
,...,
LJ
,
,
, ,
. ,
, I , ,
I I.
^ ,.... i
, ........ /'-' I
I '/ '/
,
, ,
, ,
. ,
i' I ::g ,
. i . , , .
. ' '
, I
, i , I
, , .
, , ,< , . , , . ' .
L , i ,
, 'N , I I
If 1 I . ,
, U ,
, , , , ,
-
I i' ,
I , ' . . ,
!_L 1 , , ' .
, , ,
, , , , '
I ,
, I ' ' , ,
i I
,
, , i
,
I
, i
. !
i
, I I
o
0.5
1.0 1.5
VOLUME (AC.-FTJ
2.0
2.5
LEGEND
--e- GRADING PLAN
-/::s-- AS-BUILT
-
FIGURE 5