HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC October 15, 1991
'J
,
CA..
CITY of ANDOVER
Regular City Council Meeting - october 15, 1991
7:30 P.M.
Call to Order
Resident Forum
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Discussion Items
1. Special Use Permit/Riverdale Church
2. Lot Split/2206 - 145th Avenue N.W.
3. Variance/Fire station #2
4. Wayne Holmberg Sketch plan
5. Meadows of Round Lake Sketch plan
6. Kelsey Estates Final plat
7. Ordinance 8, Sec. 4.05 Amendment
8. Ordinance 10 Amendment
9. Genthon PondslAccept Streets, Cont.
9:00 P.M.
Union Contract Negotiations
Staff, Committee, Commission
10. Uses in Industrial District
11. Comprehensive Plan Consultant Contract
12. Purchase Motor for Grader
13. Replace Pump Motor/Public Works Well
14. Capital Equipment PurchaseslPublic Works
15. Fire Department Bond Budget
16, Storm Drain Outlet to Ditch 37
Non-Discussion Items
17. Approve Resolution/Street Const/olesen's 2nd
18. Accept Petition/91-25/Hidden Creek E. 4th
19. Certify Mowing charges
20, Certify Sewer Hookup Charges
21. Declare Costs/91-1, 91-10, 91-14
22. Declare Cost, Order Assessment Hearing/88-30
23. Receive September Financial Statements
..---J
Mayor/council Input
Approval of Claims
Adjournment
.J
.~'''''''''''''''~'''''''''.
li" '\
~1 M
~). !
"'_.. I
..~ J'
~'~:'!!Mr~':CIIf~=
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October IS, .1991
FOR
~gENDA AW8lbO~al of Minutes
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
BY:
~.
v. Volk ~
ITEM
NO.
Approval of Minutes
The city Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
October 1, 1991
Regular Meeting
MOTION BY
,
) TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
,-)
;:l~'.""'''''''''~'~'\\
P'.' .,'
~{ ,Ii
,. ,I
';. 1
b~., ,,"4l~''''
'-'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Items
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
City planner
October 15, 1991
ITEM
NO.
j,
Riverdale Church
1657 161st Avenue NW
BY:
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to review the Special Use Permit request
of Riverdale Church to allow for the construction of a church at
the following described property:
1657 161st Avenue NW (PIN 15-32-24-14-0001)
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the Special Use Permit
process.
Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03, establishes those uses allowed by
Special Use Permit. In an R-1, Single Family Rural District,
churches are allowed by the granting of a Special Use Permit.
In granting a Special Use Permit, the City Council shall examine
the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and
general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
Planning & Zoning Review
The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their september 24, 1991
meeting, recommended approval of the Special Use Permit request.
Attached for your review is the staff report from the meeting.
please consult the minutes included in your council packets as
well.
continued
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
'---- TO
SECOND BY
. "
Page Two
Special Use Permit - Riverdale Church
1657 161st Avenue NW
October 15, 1991
'J
Recommendation
Staff and the Planning and zoning Commission recommend the City
Council approve the Special Use Permit request of Riverdale
Church to allow for the construction of a church located at 1657
161st Avenue NW (PIN 15-32-24-14-0001).
Attached is a proposed resolution for Council review and adoption,
Note: Riverdale Church will be required to submit a Commercial
Site plan for review and approval by the Andover Review
Committee (ARC) to assure the request meets all City
Ordinances as well as building codes.
"-
J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
/
RES. NO. R
-91
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF THE
RIVERDALE CHURCH TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CHURCH TO BE
LOCATED AT 1657 161ST AVENUE NW (PIN 15-32-24-14-0001), LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS:
UNPLATTED GROW TOWNSHIP SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 32, RANGE 24, EXCEPT EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
WHEREAS, The Riverdale Church has requested a Special Use
Permit to allow for the construction of a church located at 1657
161st Avenue NW (PIN 15-32-24-14-0001); and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission has reviewed
the request and has determined that said request meets the
criteria of Ordinance 8, Sections 5.03 and 7.03; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the
proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no
opposition regarding said request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning and zoning Commission to allow the Riverdale Church to
construct a church on said property with the following conditions:
1. The Special Use Permit will be subject to a sunset
clause as defined in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03(0).
2. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual
review and site inspection by City Staff.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
15th day of October, 1991
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
J
cJ
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST F,ORPLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
September 24, 1991
AGENDA ITEM
~. special Use Permit
3 Riverdale Church
Const. of Church
1657 161st Ave, NW
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
David L. carlberg
BY: City planner
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
~
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and zoning Commission is asked to review the
Special Use Permit requested by Riverdale Church to construct a
church on the following described property:
1657 161st Avenue NW (PIN 15-32-24-14-0001)
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the Special Use Permit
process.
Ordinance No.8, Section 7.03 lists those uses allowed by Special
Use Permit. In an R-1, Single Family Rural District, churches are
allowed under a Special Use Permit.
In granting a Special Use Permit, the following criteria shall be
examined.
1. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals
and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
The use would not have a detrimental effect. The use would
provide a service to the city.
2. The existing and anticipated traffic conditions including
parking facilities on adjacent streets and land.
The use will generate heavier traffic conditions onto County Road
20 (161st Avenue NW) and County Road 78 (Hanson Boulevard).
However, this should not create any detrimental traffic
conditions. The applicant will be required to obtain County
approval for any accesses onto County Road 20 and 78.
All vehjcle parking facilities shall be accommodated on site.
3. The effect on the values of property and scenic views in the
surrounding area.
The proposed use will have no adverse impact on the adjacent
property values and scenic views.
"
_/
.)
Page Two
SUP - Riverdale Church
1657 161st Avenue NW
September 24, 1991
4. The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive plan.
The use would be consistent with the Comprehensive plan.
GENERAL REVIEW
The Riverdale Church is currently meeting at the Andover
Elementary school. The Church has selected the 40 acre parcel as
a prime location for the congregation. The Church will be
required to submit a Commercial Site plan Application once the
Special Use Permit is approved.
Also, it should be noted that Staff did not receive any objections
to the location and construction of the Riverdale Church upon
mailing public hearing notices to those property owners within 350
feet of the property.
COMMISSION OPTIONS
1. The Planning and zoning Commission may approve the special Use
Permit requested by Riverdale Church to construct a church located
at 1657 161st Avenue NW (PIN 15-32-24-14-0001).
The Commission finds the request meets the criteria established in
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, including: the use will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of
the community; the use will not cause serious traffic congestions
or hazards; the use will not depreciate surrounding property; and
the use is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The Planning and zoning Commission may deny the Special Use
Permit requested by Riverdale Church to construct a church located
at 1657 161st Avenue NW (PIN 15-32-24-14-0001).
The Commission finds the request does not meet the criteria
established in Ordinance No. B, Section 5.03, In denying the
request, the Commission shall state those reasons for doing so.
3. The Planning and zoning Commission may table the item.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends option * 1 with the following conditions:
. '\
.~
1. The Special use Permit be subject to annual review and sit
inspection by Staff.
~
2. The Special Use Permit shall have a one year sunset clause as
specified in Ordinance No. B, Section 5.03(0).
)
I~
~I
~I
i-r
2W7 .n, c; ...
" F <> ;;
~ ... !::
/663> !i< <>
" ~ . ~
.. ;!
~ '" ..
[,~/O " Oi
:%
4:
:,,71 1
;
!~ 11.5(.3
;u)'z9
1,,2' j'~/
,'JJ1
IS1'+&f
I~ns
r-~
1
"
.
w
i
15HZ ~
;
.
.
i
~
"
::;
~
~
s
~
~O
I"''''
1r..<:12.5
~
1'5'/)'
:l
T
:::SAj,O ~~
f
'i<
!!
ItolSr
N
T
'"
/
------~
,
,
,
,-,..,--..,----~..
'-
\
,
,
"
"
,
,
,
\
,
,
'\
\
,
,J
....--
..-
"'---...
,
,
I
".:'
~ ----.-.-
'..,,-
,,-- ~~
,
,
,
'.
.--- -
- - --~
'-
/
,
,
,
,
'.~'
,-' ...
~
--- --..
,
\.
'"
..........--/
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
(3)
s;-,r.r At/.74' f' #.I y.,
"
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
It)
./ Edward J'.1f. tl1abal L. Ba.'fe<'''' lC~
.,CA4:
,---.._-------..
r
~
.....58~/O,g'..E
.?6,?-f .06
NO.
~E_O'-/C'JI..~- -. ...6L5.19.~..~---.-. -.
IT.OF.W.4L
P'~HWAY.'
,
PLAT
20
NO.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
\
,
,
1-..- -.. --.....
...-,
/
,..,.
~
.....
~
~
)..
~~
~ .
~
.(:).--
.
ct.....
~......
~~
~
,~
~
~
~
.......
~
~
.....
~
C
(,,)
'''''
'....,,'
,'.,
,
\
,
,
,
~
~
<:
~
~_.,
2(J.
.,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
,.
/..:5'...
A"'!"/~
"
...
~
'"
-'-J
A/B'-/O'.,7/"W
~6.?~. 4&..
r---
..
\ .......
"
~.
....
_"""__ ~__.~"t;.:.,__~.
"-,i'i~;';'~ f,:i~~;.~'~~.'-o;~-~:~:~~:<~;~~~.'~;}~~;~~~~~""~";.'}:;~~I:t~!
~~~r~;~ ..~~.~~ ;~~~';;z:>~~/r;'!Ii!,,:..~~:-::'-4/~'-::-~ ..:-"~.
._)
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. · ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 · (612) 755-5100
I
l
!
\
.('
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
property Address
1657 161Ave,NW Andover
Lot
Addition
U,J~\o.+kJ C::IrovJ Ts.o
~ V+ Or NE. 'Ii:\' 56::. \S-32,Z"'
t:x ~ S\..{~j'TO ~
Legal Description of property:
(Fill in whichever is apporpriate):
Block
plat Parcel PIN 15'22~140001
(If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal)
*********************************************************************
Reason for Request R;vprn?l~ ~hurch, now meetinq at Andover E1em.
wo~ld like to purchase the above property to build a church faclllty
ran
section of Ordinance ~.D 3
\
Current zon~ng
~-J
*********************************************************************
Name of Applicant
Riverdale Church (P?Rrnr Srprnpn M r,?n~gpn
Address
774R 1,qrn Avp NW An0nvpr MN ~~,o~
Signature
757-7395 Business phone
~L /jj___
323-9787
Home phone
Date
<;-/12/91
*********************************************************************
Property. Owner.:.. (Fee Owner) Edward Bayers
(I~ different from above)
Address
1657 161Av~. NW Annnv~r. MN 55304
'-)
Home phone 434-6793 Business phone
Signature ~~.A~ Date g/;317/ '
l
*********************************************************************
,.
..,
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PAGE 2
"-
., )
The following information shall be submitted prior to review by the
City of Andover:
1. A scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow~ dimensions of the property and
structures~ front, side and rear yard building setbacks;
adjacent streets; and location and use of existing structures
wi thin 100 feet. tic Or\L II~ .....,/:... .3So ~+.
2. The names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet
of the subjec erty.
J{ I~< bl)
Application Fee:
Filing Fee:
Amended Special Use Permit Fee: $50.00
Date Paid
0/:1/ tj /
Receipt *
31z. 93'
Rev. 8-01-91
CRITERIA FOR GRANTING SPECIAL USE PERMITS
In granting a Special Use Permit, the City Council shall consider the
advice and recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and:
1. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals
and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
2. Existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking
facilities on adjacent streets and lands.
3. The effect on values of property and scenic views in the
surrounding area.
4. The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan.
. '\
... -~)
"-
)
"~/""'_C, <.'""
"~'
:/ '\
! 'l.
-, -.
,
'I
\ J
~; :I
" .l.. .,1
':-.7
~~';'~~':l~;y""
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, september 24, 1991 at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the Special Use
Permit request of Riverdale Church to allow for the construction
of a church on the property located at 1657 161st Avenue NW (PIN
15-32-24-14-0001), legally described as follows:
UNPLATTED GROW TOWNSHIP SE1/4 OF NE1/4 SECTION 15-32-24 EXCEPT
ROADS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
A copy of the application and location will be available at
the Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
_.1~p Jd;
Victoria Volk, city
Clerk
publication dates:
September 13, 1991
September 20, 1991
'\
j
, )
14-32-27-23-0001
James L. Stelzig
1433 N.W. 161st St.
Andover, MN. 55304
14-32-27-32-0002
Raymond & Pauline Boyer
15915 Hanson Blvd. N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
15-32-27-12-0001
Dorothy Aasness
16725 Hanson Blvd. N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
15-32-27-12-0001
Jeff & Lynda Bergeron
16422 Hanson Blvd.N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
15-32-27-13-0001
Peter A. & Rona L. Leuty
P.O. Box 870
Andover, MN. 55304
15-32-27-41-0001
Ed & Joyce Lutz
2325 Uplander St. N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
'I
,j
. ..
/ /
/..
~ .-~
,-.:::~:.~ .,..
.,7/'
.1'://
I . ./
:.~/
//"1
:,~
.~ "!:r.1
) (fA)
." ",;
,^,"-"","
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACfION
October 15, 1991
ITEM
NO.
DATE
ORlGINAT.ING DEPARTMENT
Plannlng l;!
David L. Carlberg, ~
city Planner
AGENDA DSECTION . It
NQ lSCUSSlon ems
J. Platz/G. Windschitl
2206 145th Avenue NW
BY:
REQUEST
The Planning and Zoning Commission at its regular meeting on
September 24, 1991, reviewed the request for a lot split by James
G. Platz and Gerald G. Windschitl located at 2206 145th Avenue NW.
The applicants are requesting to split the east 43.10 feet of Lot
12, Block 1, Kensington Estates and combine that portion or parcel
with lot 11, Block 1, Kensington Estates. Consult the attached
staff report dated September 24, 1991 and the minutes from the
Planning and zoning Commission meeting for further information.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval of the lot
split request with conditions as indicated on the attached
Resolution.
COUNCIL ACTION
, "
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
, .
.----
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
,
)
RES. NO. R
-91
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE LOT SPLIT REQUEST OF JAMES G. PLATZ AND
GERALD G. WINDSCHITL TO SPLIT OFF THE EAST 43.10 FEET OF LOT 12,
BLOCK 1, KENSINGTON ESTATES FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMBINING THAT
PORTION WITH LOT 11, BLOCK 1, KENSINGTON ESTATES, PURSUANT TO
ORDINANCE NO. 40.
WHEREAS, James G. Platz and Gerald G. Windschitl have
requested a lot split on the property located at 2206 NW 145th
Avenue, legally described as:
Lot 12, Block 1, Kensington Estates.
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission has reviewed
the request and has determined that said request meets the
criteria of Ordinance No. 40; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission finds the
request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and would not
have a detrimental effect upon the health, safety, morals and
general welfare of the City of Andover; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no
opposition to said request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the lot split.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning and zoning Commission to allow the lot split on said
property with the following conditions:
1. A Covenant, which has ben reviewed and approved by the City
Attorney, be entered into wherein it states that the lot
remnant parcel created is solely for the enjoyment of James G.
platz Sr. and is not intended to be created for a building
site;
2. That the fully executed Covenant be recorded at the Anoka
County Recorder's Office and that a Request for Combination
be completed which transfers title of the lot remnant parcel
to James G. Platz, Sr. and documents that the lot remnant is
not a building site pursuant to Andover Ordinances No.8, 10
and 40.
)
3. That the provisions of Ordinance No. 40, Section III (E) apply
to this request (Sunset Clause).
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
15th day of October, 1991
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
ATTEST
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
"J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST F.ORPLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE
24 September 1991
AGENDA ITEM
4. 2206 NW 145th Avenue
Lot Split Request of
James G. platz, Sr. and
Gerald Windschitl
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT . ~
Planning & zoning ~~ ~
BY: d'Arcy Bosell, ZA
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
APPLICANT
James G. platz, Sr. and Gerald G. Windschitl on the property
located at 2206/2215 NW 145th Avenue.
REQUEST
To split off of Lot 12, Block 1, Kensington Estates (2206 NW
145th Avenue) a parcel of land described in the Caine &
Associates Certificate of Survey dated July 30, 1991 and to
combine that parcel split off of Lot 12 with Lot 11, Block 1,
Kensington Estates (2215 NW 145th Avenue) which is adjacent to
this parcel.
The property is located within an R-4 Urban Residential Zoning
District and is platted property.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No. 40, the Lot Split Ordinance, defines a residential
lot split as "any division of a lot, parcel, or tract of land
into not more than two (2) parcels when both divided parcels meet
or exceed the minimum requirements for platted lots in the
applicable zoning district". Subsection A further provides that
"no residential lot, parcel of tract of larid shall be divided
unless the resultant lots have at least the minimum width, depth
and square footage as required for any parcel of land in the
zoning district wherein the lot is located".
Ordinance~No, 10, the Subdivision Ordinance, provides the vehicle
by which raw land is divided and therein states in Section
9.06(i) that "lot remnants which are below minimum area or
dimension must be added to adjacent or surrounding lots rather
than be allowed to remain as an unusable outlot or parcel".
Ordinanc;::e No.8,
requirements for
(Section 6.02).
as follows:
the zoning Ordinance, provides the minimum
lots, parcels or tract in each zoning district
The minimum requirements for an R-4 District are
"
,)
Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit
Lot width at Front Setback
line '
Lot Depth
11,400 s.L
80 feet
130 feet
~)
Page Two
In Re: 2206 NW 145th Avenue
24 september 1991
REVIEW
When originally received by victoria Volk, City Clerk, the
request by Mr. Windschitl was "to move interior lot lines" as
provided in Ordinance No. 10, Section 14. That portion of the
Ordinance, however, applies only to conveyances by metes and
bounds and this property is platted.
To make certain my determination was correct that Section 14 as
noted above did not apply, I spoke with William G. Hawkins, City
Attorney. On August 28, 1991, we discussed this matter and he
advised that "platted lots must be done (split) under Ordinance
No. 40". He further noted that "when splitting a platted lot you
are creating two (2) lots. What cannot be done is these platted
lots cannot be combined with another lot and/or an ad.acent
parce. T e on y way patte ots can e corn 1ne 1S y
replatting them and thus create a new legal description for each
new platted lot." When you split a platted lot you create two
(2) lots and the next issue has to do with whether or not they
meet the minimum requirements and thus be determined to be a
buildable lot. The case in point does not meet that standard and
by acting on this request the City allows the creation of a
parcel which does not meet the minimum depth (43.10' -v- 130')
but does meet the area requirement (17,857 s.f.) and does have
frontage (Quinn Drive T's into this parcel and has 60' of width).
Mr. Hawkins further advised that "if the property owner does not
replat the lot, that a Covenant be entered into which states that
the 'remnant lot' is not a building site pursuant to Andover
Ordinances No.8, 10 and 40 and that its ownership is conveyed to
the person who owns the parcel to which they would like to attach
the remnant parcel (James G. Platz, Sr.). This Covenant would
then be recorded with the County at the same time as the deed
andlor survey. It should be adequately documented, however, that
the remnant lot created is solely for the enjoyment of the
applicant to increase their lot area and not created for the
purpose of an additional building site."
In discussing this matter with Todd J. Haas, Assistant City
Engineer, the request was made of Caine & Associates to calculate
the lot areas for the parcels under consideration and attached
you will find a revised survey dated August 28, 1991.
COMMISSION OPTIONS
'\
,J
1. The Planning & Zoning Commission may recommend to the City
Council approval of the Lot Split request of James G. Platz,
Sr. and Gerald G. Windschitl to split Lot 12, Block 1,
Kensington Estates, into two (2) parcels, subject to the
following conditions:
~)
Page Three
In Re: 2206 NW 145th Avenue
24 September 1991
a. A Covenant, which has been reviewed and approved by
the City Attorney, be entered into wherein it states
that the lot remnant parcel created is solely for
the enjoyment of James G. Platz, Sr. and is not
intended to be created for a building site;
b. That the fully executed Covenant be recorded at the
Anoka County Recorder's Office and that a Request
for Combination be completed which transfers title
of the lot remnant parcel to James G. Platz, Sr. and
documents that the lot remnant is not a building
site pursuant to Andover Ordinances No.8, 10 and
40.
c. That the provisions of Ordinance No. 40, Section
III(E) apply to this request (Sunset Clause).
2. The Planning & Zoning Commission may recommend to the City
Council denial of the Lot Split Request of James G. Platz,
Sr. and Gerald G. Windschitl, as noted above. The reasons
therefor shall be clearly stated.
3. The Planning & Zoning Commission may table the matter pending
additional information from the applicant(s) and/or staff.
Make certain the intent of your recommendation is clear so that
referral back to this request at some time in the future reflects
what was meant by your recommendation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the professional advice of the City Attorney and the
execution and recording of the Covenant and Deed as so noted,
staff recommends Option No.1.
~)
,J
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
LOT SPLIT it
Property Address
LOT SPLIT REQUEST FORM
c71,;{()0 /)U) /~--r/) /h/~
~"'- J...c~ At cl(!rC__("v.I rl-ct-~h...cl
Legal Description of property:
(Fill in whichever is appropriate):
Lot _l.;l..
Block
Addition 1::e.vS'''''t"r...,) t=S'i":II"'J
plat Parcel PIN
(If metes and bounds, attach the complete legal)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason for Request 10 Sfl:, t"If~ n~ LnT (2. B1CJct::
k.....J ..,,-,T<.J
h1'4"TCJ f'r PA..t"~t ,.,~ L^~J &u',,- "'~C\ ,',J C'A'''-C.. ~ AJs"'c.....'l'a.,) (1,:,.,.;"<:.1"<
/..;1 I ;:l
b.. y,...7
CU'~
IJV~...:::I
'T7l
Q r s......v...7
00- (.":...,, -rh..
c\ 4'''' c:\ :::n", /.'1 JOI '1., I -
PkLc-( <: "I~ of'F o~
,
.::I'T w~_I,.l
;""7
1....-r II
wk..e-.L. ,j
~~ -:)4<: ..::T -r.>',
'/J.. : J
,P.-t1-c....(
,
Current zoning
l(es'.J.-..:~ \ (1<-1)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Address
o1~ IS-
~A _oLJ (.:; P 14'z.. S:...
f <-I ~ 1tVl. IV"'" A NJD'vc.-
/1.1 A./
S"..:s"'" jgy
Name of Applicant
Home PhoneJ~ 1M Business Phone I,
Signature .~ )J, p~ ~ Date 7//0/?/
----------- ---------------------------------------------------------
property Owner (Fee Owner) ~"',4.'A (i; (-'IIN~J",1. .12-
(If different from above)
Address '2Coc.{O /~-:l ~ LAJ ^' oN' fl,."dt1vC."'" f?-tAl
Home Phone '-1;2.1-9.2..17 Business Phone 'i;1. 7 -0 '1.1J-
,,~ Signature .JJ~ ltt/ ~'.-~ Date q- 9-Pr
---------------------------------------------------------------------
r SPLIT
~GE 2
Attach a scaled drawing of the proposed split of the property showing:
scale and North arrow; dimensions of the property and structures;
'J. front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent street names;
:' location and use of existing structures within 100 feet.
The date the property became a lot of record, the names and addresses
of all property owners within 350 feet of the property proposed to be
split, and the complete legal description of the subject property must
also be provided.
I hereby certify that this property has not been subdivided within
the last three years.
yY tv~
;JJ ~
Signature 0 App ~cant
Lot Split Fee: $50.00
Filing Fee: $15.00
Date Paid
1/;0/91 Receipt # ~ 7 Jb/
/' I I I
Park Dedication:
/) /r:0
Date Paid
Receipt #
Rev.
8-01-91
"
-'--./
.'- ...: "~,.:'., - -.' }':-,
:.~_.~. .'.-':-~__:7}~"
;::,'_.:~~-~:~fii:-:j~,~_-:;::~~~~~~:~~~f:i~;?flj~~~,..:-
"
,~
~,.~. ;.c'"
. \
~. ~
, 1
\. I
" .L J
-~"- /
,....,,?".:...:.,.,.
J~_.;'.'''''~- -
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD NW. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 · (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, September 24, 1991 at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the lot split
request of James G. Platz located on the following legally
described property:
LOT 12, BLOCK 1, KENNSINGTON ESTATES
(Generally located at 2206 145TH AVENUE NW)
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
A copy of the application and proposed lot split will be available
at Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
,[~ ~~
Victorla Vo , City Clerk
Publication dates: September 13, 1991
September 20, 1991
'-)
27-32-24-24-0003
.~ )S. & Terry Dennis Kaye
[~440 Crosstown Blvd. N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
27-32-24-31-0028
Kenneth C. & Bethie B. Grell
14430 Quinn Dr. N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
27-32-24-24-0004
R. S. Lubrant & M. A. Weber
14477 Osage St. N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
27-32-24-31-0029
Bruce H. & Madelon L. Mann
14420 Quinn Dr. N,W.
Andover, MN. 55304
27-32-24-24-0005
Timothy R. & Sharon M. Cronk
14465 Osage St. N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
27-32-24-32-0041
T. L. Englund & W. J. Dietzler
14442 Raven St. N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
27-32-24-23-0011
Charles K. & Eilec Hawkinson
2269 145th Ave.
Andover, MN. 55340
27-32-24-23-13
Michael J. & Diane M. Dixon
2241 145th Ave N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
27-32-24-23-14
Douglas L. & Marjorie Noel
2227 145th Ave N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
27-32-24-31-0026
Patrick & Patricia Springman
14450 Quinn Dr. N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
27-32-24-31-0027
Wayne E. & Peggy Coburn
14440 Quinn St. N.W.
Andover, MN. 55304
%-"
-......... ;'~.,
,>,"'-" ., ...
'- ~~, ',,:, .
iJ;~'.
'J~
'1
/
'"
'......~ ~~
:,~'--.""'-J',.,:
,. - ""-. ....~ .
iO~)
t7
,
#
_ '~~J_
27 32 24 24 0003
, ,
'J
Jan S. and Terry Dennis Kaye
14440 Crosstown Blvd NW
Andover, Mn 55304
27 32 24 24 0004
R. S. Lubrant and M. A. Weber
14477 Osage st. NW
Andover, MN 55304
27 32 24 24 0005
Timothy R. and Sharon M Cronk
14465 Osage st. NW
Andover, MN 55304
27 32 24 23 0011
Charles K. and Eilec Hawkinson
2269 145th Ave
Andover, MN 55304
27 32 24 23 13
Michael J. and Diane M. Dixon
2241 145th Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
27 32 24 23 14
Douglas L. and Marjorie Noel
2227 145th Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
27 32 24 31 0026
Patrick and Patricia Springman
14450 Quinn Dr NW
Andover, MN 55304
"
_~J
,)
27 32 24 31 0027
Wayne E. and Peggy Coburn
14440 Quinn st NW
Andover, MN 55304
27 32 24 31 0028
Kenneth C. and Bethie B. Grell
14430 Quin Dr. NW
Andover, MN 55304
27 32 24 31 0029
Bruce H. and Madelon L. Mann
14420 Qrinn Dr. NW
Andover, MN 55304
27 32 24 32 0041
T. L. Englund and W. J. Dietzler
14442 Raven st. NW
Andover, MN 55304
-)
CAINE ct A~
LAND SURV~
,
.pl.
Poat-ll~ brand fax transmittal memo 7671
TtI cI r:,.nlI :s- C2..
Co. Co.
"720 H(ghwo1/ 66 N.J. - No
434-'
~
CJ:RTIlICA'I1l cr 8URVBY Iul. Jury IItn<ao1Utl
Fu'
7
PROPOSZll UI<lo\L DS9CIIIPTICII, (PARCIL Al
Lot 11, Block 1, ~ 18!A"', eooord1n9 to t.be noorded plat thu"&of, Anoka County, Kinn.lOta, and th&t put
Lot 12, ..14 Block 1, lyini northerly ot the northe..terlv exe.naion of the .outh.rly line of .aid Lot 11.
I'lWJPOllJ:l) UI<lo\L DI8CIlIPTlllll, IPMCZL II
Tbat part ot: Lot 12, Block 1, KlXSnKi't'alI JIV.'R8, aooo.rc11.Dg to the recorded plat thereof, Moke County, ~.ot.a, ly
lIOutberly of th4 nort.h.eaaterly IxtUJIloo of the eoutberly 11M ot Lot 11. aa.i4 Block 1.
I
filE COpy
...
wnn
n -l)'u.,
Nor' .
VI
,q~n D/ LD r II- tl8; ii' S,. r~
(1.1 4<.)
~,.<'~ 'Y' 5h;' /'-"" (..r I Z <t.dc!<d
J f.a Lof II.:. 1~8.J-7 57_ rt,
(o.~/ A,.)
/Jrr~ V P~rc'..1 A. do'.. 07~ 5;. ~
( /':,Z -9() .
/Jrl. 0/ bll!!. J.l, ~n .s;J,
(".77 "k)
Rr~;J 0/ P.ru/ 8"/S;78~ ..5j.~
(o.J~/k)
w
.
'1
j
$CAlL: I INOt . -'-'2--1[(T.
o D[HOTtS 1/1 INCJol 1110'" PIf'( SET.
. O[}/OTt$ rouNO "OH WotnJWDH.
~~~~,~_O~i'~$..:'~~~~~'''/'L NT /1{ 1f17.
I HfRC8Y CERTFY THA' WIS SUIt'otY. PLM
~ ~D"()I'lT"AS "ltl7A,ftfO 1'1' we OA UNOil
Ill... DIRECT SV"~""S1()N AHO THAT I ~ I
OUl Y REOIST[,IUP lAHO SU"\'EYO~ UHt:lD
THE LA.WS Of THE STA.T[ Of WINNESQTA
~) ~;: .~: NO ""
R.,.s..J .J","lf t,,J I'"~
JOt NO. ". I~ J
sre.." T. ~t ,..~4
~
" ~ ~ ~ ">
.. ...
""' 'i:
.~
~ ~
~ ., '"
_"'d-g-:!"Jr ST.
y> Y<'
~ ' ~
l;~':"
Js '.J
. - '"
0
~
, ;.'
,
it
~~
." >\i
, '",
'~i ~ ~
!11. ~
~
5'
..
III
'\
:;-
tl
(}p/(/)c IIzv 1-
cfcbcrn /J~0P
@
CI)
3::
l\i
"
:~.~;>:):./.;;., -- -, - _ _ I FIRE DE\AiT\ENT_'ril?/~ _ ~ _ _ __
0I055TO_ - 8LVO "''It, 1_ - ,6"\" I ....,
.J ' I ,'(21
. f A--jUO"r'/ : ~ L' 'U~ .-s'
&iz; 0 / : I I,'\. ~ '
Zc m,j..?> : I J'I'I' 'I'J " " ,
~j3 I' . f/( i' " ,.., "" ;,.
. ') Mr.Afi-/"..1' J. I/qq/ - ANDOVER i :iI,' ~ .. ~~: ~
~ ELEMENTARY , '" "'u ~
SCHOOL l, Z~ ~o r9 .,
, ~ $1'" lJ 24 lis <II L
;2i~ ;.L : ~f.f.j fIl~;r-~~ ,
. :!....;::'~ ~ I ~ ' tgmil : ,A'I" 12 (' I ' '/2 / //
',~.~:...:.~:::.;'.:..~.~:~.:.'.:.::.:...'.:.~...'.':~.~ : , ~'," ~ j : j ~ ~ . '" 1,~}S4. " '/, ~
: ~ s T~'I ~I~;lt!~ H~~ '6 Tn 'F /.
'::; :..<<.:..:::.:. , "ut'/)~ , : ~ I "'/~t'! :L" " ~. 8 ~
.......,. .:... . \ ' .' ~ ..: 1,.;1M~ .:j~ '0 ,.
., .'~-~'~.,. --i ~"7TM , r-;o II --I !,&",&.(\) .:'- z
:..:::....:~i;.;.:.. _':'1. , ~ ~ I IIr...;;::. . ~s ~/3
~,:.<.'i:.::.;.::.=: = _ '~'{gl!G...f, :,EN 1 ,I. 'I'i' , , "'5-\ \"r;t.
fll___g ~~7 R-4! ;~it~t~
k .Uj,,~J'; ! :"'1 ~ R kJ 'g" -.;
'12 "1~[61"l:i"IOI" I Ot.'C' .J. '. ~ 1,__ r;;-"-;-- .h;-'
, frr~r~ ) : -i' J, . I ~ ~ i '~: ' H' 7
"MI.= ,.' y;, ~~A'~lfT~r~ I I I :
'3 ~~"~~ :;;;~' ;~/t~l~f~ E:""nar. '" - - :
, ~ :t";g,2j Yost 4~ " :
'" · 20 >>' ~J I
. " :(/2:-.~~' 11...~y' . ,,-'
~ZI.: 2_ v-#,,' . r
- II "(f. 23.1_ ~, . I
'" ..... "7 ,.;:,..2< "~ - :
~nl. ~. cA';>' IH ,) ~/!! ' ,
1/, %~/' .,;} ~ .'L01 ~' 1."\..... :
i'vJ~ "' .A./ /" J ~',,;...~ ____ 1
':_.",.,'-.::::::~:;' . /~Y. .,-rZI.JI"'-711\90I
.;-;;;.'::~>~{;:: ~)~~: l" '\ W~r.1TE "I"" OL.'II
..::..:>~;../'.'.:.>..: . Irr., 'i<EN~~~V'2 '.I"T~. ,,'51~
c':::::::.'::.:'. \{~: ~~~'. '1Uf1\J1'~'" ~:.. / o.~.
.... _::..:..:.:.:.>....;.; ~'~~ 'KE(iSIN.6to. v, .(. :.
...... :. '.-:~'>-~:. .'.- ~ . '5, 1 ~I It..
;<H~~:j.'; "I.~ J .1(( .' ~ 'I~
"A. ,_.!.-;r.;\~ J
, ~' >>./,-;s..- =-+ .!.. '~"V '
.!....J # ",. ~J #~ .. f-;-
~,\; , ~ --;-- ::;=~ - . II-
! -; "1/~..... "3" , ~ !:.. a "':"j\s 1'1'
.~ -1~~"" ", ~l~'":''' -; :.x:::',/~ G B
~~- '!::I" I'~~ ,,-r-;.' X". ~f.!..
,0 ~- I I, .J~i ' ~ Z It1
~\ ~ 1 'I'I..I'~' _~:: "":~~:~:,, ________ _____
OUTLOT C. ",\."J~.:j:- 71' A n~ ~
,(.,""'/~I'" ~i ~T}j~~ti~~ ~. /\.
9 2?' ";'i;',,,~.,~r;. "
R~ .'rjl T. rn # lHA" HW f-
-,rll 'IIANO(.""-'- II ~~~"f'~_'~~
; ~ ,." 5 .J .J ~ 2T ~/~"<..~\28 I "
I :.. OUnorA r" 2 Z I.J Z8 ~")"!"
~ \; ~ AOU, I,. n '1'\-51 I""""" ;'"
j~\. , 'I' ~. ,\, Jf.1]'.1 [@~
d v.J:) ~'I. ~ r.
~ 'J~ I I. ·
'ii, ':lIA A^no R
!17~''''n . ~ -:
~~ Ii I A"f_ N~.
O~I ~ oMM~ ~Al
.
I \'(~~J O"r{or
I ,:\1 ~a ..
I ~ iLt./)
I -,:::~.A
I I '''~O
I * ~io.JI .~" ,.,,,
I ..., I~ I I..A/ltE
- 5~5
[)-) ~'fi~-
""""- I ~ - ~ ~,::f~9'
"'" I ~ ;1....
liIl....... I
.....~I. L I ~.//'/
! ~1)0'\/......../,.
I ~S;/..
.ji<~
;~r.~
; I ft.
/ 1m ~.~i~.\',,~~
! I"'::::: 1~;~~;~1f.l '7f,\'':'"
ii, " }!(f~/'/"!'~ ~.~
r: 6 /5. Vz.:... I., T ~ 1r3 r~
I I ., lZ;~ Ie . · 0111112 31
: _. ., ~11 y,? ., 139 H ~ ~
'DIIAl .;-,..: 'U.,i ~~~ '>li- B/
:: I ~Ut.,. !5fi4I31IZ, I(l I 3ii3~31!3(
,I I ~J....!J' I: 't
[~II 5 -:--r roJ>-.i7''Aj )lzll~I~1123~
" ~ 3E."'-.I.._U I
I . ~"I"i~I"'"'' "h"":::.
I ;5~f:rRfY..,.7'J · "'.'rl' '[7,
I . !~~1:r,-' 2. 9 II
I , . 7J9..' t4 13,/2.111 ~ l!!
,I ,.o,.,~ Nf3~
. ;;M~I-~~;' .~~~~,
1 - T ~ C; " I ~......,.. u,. i .. ,... '........,
-
.-J
R-I\
I
I
\ \
LB
.'-.
.::..
....I:
, I
,
.
. .
f.-
~ WA
"l~"."""".'"~'~'"'>'''''''
l 1~
"",~
.J' f(J
. 1, y...
~ ",",\.-j-,~~~~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
October 15, 1991
DATE
BY:
APPRO~ FOR
AGE~~
II
BY! -
J
ITEM
NO.
J.
VQ~ .,.,.L
16603 NW Valley Drive
Sign Area
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT -;)
Plannlng ~
David L. Carlberg
Planner
AGENDA SECTION .
NO. U1SCUSSlon
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is asked to review the variance request
of Sign Services, Inc. (551) on behalf of the Andover
Volunteer Fire Department, et aI, on the property located at
16603 NW Valley Drive. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family
Rural. The variance is to allow the signage on Fire Station #2 to
exceed the maximum square footage allowed by Ordinance No.8,
Section 8.07.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and zoning Commission, at their September 24, 1991
meeting, recommended approval of the variance request by Sign
Services, Inc. (551) on behalf of the Andover Volunteer Fire
Department, et al.
Attached please find a proposed resolution for your review and
approval, the staff report presented at the September 24, 1991
Planning and zoning Commission meeting. Please consult the
September 24, 1991 Planning and zoning Commission Minutes for
further background information.
COUNCIL ACTION
"
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
,.../
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
)
RES. NO. -91
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE VARIANCE REQUEST OF SIGN SERVICES,
INC. ON BEHALF OF THE ANDOVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ET AL TO
ALLOW FOR SIGNAGE ON FIRE STATION #2 TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM SQUARE
FOOTAGE ALLOWED BY ORDINANCE NO.8, SECTION 8.07 ON THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 16603 VALLEY DRIVE NW.
WHEREAS, Sign Services, Inc. on behalf of the Andover
Volunteer Fire Department et aI, has requested a variance to allow
for signage on Fire Station #2 to exceed the maximum square
footage allowed by Ordinance No.8, Section 8.07 on the property
located at 16603 valley Drive NW; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission hQs reviewed the
request and has determined that said request meets the conditions
established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.04 and that a hardship
exists due to the strict interpretation of the Ordinance and the
characteristics of the land which would preclude the Fire
Department a reasonable amount of signage for area identification;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning & zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the variance as requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission and hereby approves the variQnce
request of Sign Services, Inc. on behalf of the Andover Volunteer
Fire Department et al to allow for signage on Fire Station #2 to
exceed the maximum square footage allowed by Ordinance No.8,
Section 8.07 on the property located at 16603 Valley Drive NW.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
15th day of October, 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
ATTEST:
VictoriQ Volk, City Clerk
)
)
.)
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST F,ORPLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE
24 September 1991
AGENDA ITEM
8_ 16603 NW Valley Drive
Variance Request of SSI
for Sign Area greater
than allowed by Ord. 8
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT :'I
lWV'1 .
Planning & Zoning r J
BY: d'Arcy Bosell, ZA
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
APPLICANT
BY:
Sign Services, Inc. (SSI) on behalf of the Andover Volunteer Fire
Department, et aI, on the property located at 16603 NW Valley
Drive.
REQUEST
To allow the signage on .Fire Station *2 located at this address
to exceed the maximum square footage allowed by Ordinance No.8,
Section 8.07.
The property is located within an R-1 Single Family Rural
Residential District and the permitted sign area allowed in this
district is thirty-two (32 s.f.) square feet for an Area
Identification Sign, six (6 s.f.) for a Real Estate Sign and four
'(4 s.f.) square feet for a Residential Identification Sign.
The proposed sign area is 85.17 s.f.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No.8, Section 8.07 provides that in a Residential
District the following signs are permitted:
Type:
Style:
Numbe r :
Size:
H.eight:
Projection:
Illumination:
"
'J
Residential Identification, Temporary
Combination, Free-Standing, Pedestal, Wall
One (1) per lot frontage
No more than four (4 s.f.) square feet per
dwelling
Thirty-two (32 s.f.) for non-residential signs
offering a residential development for sale
Six (6 s.f.) square feet for real estate signs
offering individual properties either land
andlor buildings, for sale, lease or rent
Not over ten (10') feet above grade except as
otherwise provided herein
Any sign over four (4 s.f.) square feet shall be
set back at least ten (10') feet from any lot
line
Indirect or diffused lighting of signs permitted,
subject to lumination controls.
,-~
Page Two
In Re: 16603 Nw Valley Drive
Variance: Sign Area
24 September 1991
Section 3.02, Definitions, deals with both sign styles and types.
A Residential Identification sign is "... a sign identifying a
resident (including address and profession, occupation or home
occupation), school, church or other non-business use."
A siln is defined as "a name, identification, description,
disp ay, structure, illustration, or device which is affixed to,
painted, or represented either directly or indirectly upon a
building or other surface which directs attention to an object,
product, place, activity, person, institution, organization or
business."
Section 5.04 of Ordinance No.8, Variances & Appeals, provides
the vehicle by which an issue may be considered when it does not
meet the strictest interpretation of the Ordinance. The request,
however, cannot be the "use" but instead is something which can
be measured, such as "sign area". The introductory paragraph to
this section provides the rationale for considering a variance
and states: "Where there are practical difficulties or
unnecessary hardships in any way of carrying out the strict
letter of the provisions of this Ordinance, an appeal may be made
and a variance granted. The hardships or difficulties must have
to do with the characteristics of the land and not the property
owner."
REVIEW
This portion of Ordinance No.8 (Section 8.07) was reviewed
extensively by both the Planning & zoning Commission and the city
Council and on May 16, 1989 8JJJ was adopted which now applies to
all sign permit requests.
The property upon which Fire Station *2 is currently being
constructed is zoned R-1, as previously stated. Although the
Ordinance, in Section 7, provides that "public owned and operated
property except as herein amended" is permitted, it does not
exclude public owned property from meeting the same standards as
any other applicant and/or request. I do not think that at the
time the site was being reviewed, the ramifications of retaining
the R-1 District designation was considered. Property zoned
"residential" is the most restrictive zoning district within the
City.
\
'-)
Based on the above, it is this writer's opinion that this would
substantiate the statement that "the hardship or difficulties
must have to do with the characteristics of the land ..." and
thus, the application for a Variance which is pending. This
property has been zoned R-1 since the adoption of the Zoning
Ordinance in January of 1971. Hindsight is always 20-20 and it
certainly would have been cleaner and easier if the City had
.rezoned the property to a non-residential zone but they did not
... and here we are.
~
Page Three
In Re: 16603 NW Valley Drive
Variance: Sign Area
24 September 1991
The Commission needs to make a determination as to whether or not
the sign area requested is reasonable and that the request
continues to protect the integrity of the zoning district within
which the property is located. The sign area requested is almost
three (3) times larger than would otherwise be permitted for a
free-standing area identification sign such as it located at
Andover Elementary School, Meadow Creek Church, Anoka Assemblies
of God Church, etc. The overriding question is: Is the sign
area of 85.17 s.f. reasonable and how does it relate to the
overall appearance of the structure?
COMMISSION OPTIONS
1. The Planning & zoning Commission may recommend to the City
Council approval of the Variance request of SSI on behalf of
the Andover Volunteer Fire Department to allow for the
erection of a sign which exceeds the maximum square footage
allowed in a R-l District;
2. The Planning & zoning Commission may recommend to the City
Council denial of the Variance request of SSI on behalf of
the Andover Volunteer Fire Department to allow for the
erection of a sign which exceeds the maximum square footage
allowed in a R-l District;
3. The Planning & Zoning Commission may table the matter pending
additional information from the applicant and/or staff.
Make certain that in exercising any of the above options the
reasons therefor are specific and related to the Ordinance and
its application to the request.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Ordinance No.8, Section 2, Intent & Purpose, states that "This
Ordinance is adopted for the purpose of ... protecting the public
health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience and general welfare
[of the residents of Andover] ..." It has been determined by the
public by their approval of the bond referendum that the
construction of a new fire station was for the protection of
public health, safety, etc. It would stand to reason, then, that
the station would need to be adequately identified with signage.
Based on the professional expertise of the building designer and
the sign company, whose normal course of business it is to
provide said design and signage, they support the request for
85.17 s.f. of sign area. It is, therefore, the recommendation of
Staff that the request be approved as presented.
\
)
"-
,~
I ! II l::. - -, I
I
-
.. -.-
I 0
I
I I
I 0
I I
I
lJ I
I I
I , I
i ,
,
. I I
i I IL I f
I
_._.... "_1-_ I
. . rh.. ~~. I
.~ - , -.r -- -:=1 I
~ 0
.. ! i
-c
0 i 1 ~
I ~
~ ~~.
I. <.::::t.-LCo>.
I '" ~
0 I t...:,"<~ .
I
I -<.......
... I
" I
... I I
, -----
1\
-=..=~
I I 1r-~-
II' I
" I
I :' ,
" I
.....:;'o-~ I'
( " -
, ~' -...
, II
: -0<::'"'" co:...
c/! '''''~ + L-
: (~0l ~11 ~q:,-:- ">- "- <:1,... I
I Ci .~ ~ ....;>. - ... -.
=. ;", ~.~ oJ)r 'pl"-
~p~ ~ (qJ, - '<:...... '" I
, , - -
..
I .. Q) ~ C=J ~~ I ..
. o '? fJ 0
.. ' ~j tfiI _ I
~ - ~ lQ) ~ ~ -'lj;... L . q ..- ---
...
. ~; .~. ,-._.
. " ~ [@}
6.....,'6 u~~ ..
-=_: ~~ 5-'-"" f--
~L v).r-6.... -----------
\ - - <. -
I I ! I I - -'--'
1
I I.
,
I I .-.
I .
, I I i II _.
I I I I--
I i I
I ,. , ,-u
I I , I I I
I i I I l-
I i I I I
I !
\ I
2/,.'{," - -)
)
\
\
-n
-
r-
m
()
o
~
~~
~l'\)
~t
!~.
'<:0
-l;l "
-
~-t:.r.'-u=---J.='='J.--J..i.':::J. -r-I"'\UI'I-'-lll -Wi f"11'U,JUIvC,r:.
IU
.,:.....U:'{4{
t"'.u..:
"
'-~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN aOUl.E.VARO N.W. . ANOOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) ;55.5100
VARIANCE REQUEST FORK
Property Address /~bLJ3 /JuJ z/(JLLL(t--:2:>rJ~
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is apporpriate):
Lot
Block
Addi Hon
Pl(if meteS an~a~~~~dS' attachP;~e~~~t~~:f)~'
***************.**********~.*******Wk*****.**************************
specific HardSh~p _ ~ ~y k_~ ~~~
~~/P ,L/-~~~ '
Section of Ordinance 8.) dlZ. 8~07 Curant zoning ~-I
*********************************************************************
5~~~~.
Name of Applicant hln([nkr to/ar1zv- 77/2:, ~d/~t-
Address /7OS /Ja) &--J.t:.nj".....n.- 41dc/
HO.. phon. ,_/~b-"S 'hon. 3Ye?7'~
Signature ~ Date - f.---
*********************************************************************
Property Owner (Fee Owner) /7,/-, tJ/ A-d~
(If different from above) ~
Address -/6&i /JdJ ~ /.SAle!.
Home Phon.!;!
Business Phone
7SC-S/ rf7)
)
Signature
Date
-
***~************~*~****.*.***************************.~**************--
, '
(I)
\.
"
"
'-)
Ib7t-~
___~ .~..t!.2IZ ._--
<.
(4)
/ f:: 7~/
_' ';';',... i.-. -T- . ~ ..... I . ':
=- .";'.JO ,;,)".,
(3)
01:'" ~f-
"'.<9O<J';"'l61 TH:AVC, ..
~ ,'"'' '!o"- 1':
(,t,'
(4) (5") (t.)
(~f!') /4' ~~I :'~'~"-~'.
"
y ,
-
, ".:>': ~,:,:
; l.._
(;z) (;J) (14-)
(iV/(!J (t:./~...) :~:3C)
,
,
t:)";'~:';':
/;/)/'r/~G.~ Snc;,r~n .
~_ ({pOP/~1 '
~..~',1)
___ .--J,...-_..,~.
~. /._ ' /t"" ~ /,"
(8) (9) (;0) (II)
/:;,;..:)
,/6-,';mj ('09(1) (';070/ (i;;/..-.
,. .~
/.:.::
(.;:/...,,;. ;~ '.~
~.
1(Xl
'I)
It)
',tc)
i
(~/7rJ)
I b{P 03 y d
F..,), )-
- .-..
~. .. ......... ..
(tiP) . (28) (z9) (30)
(i;;}':': (~z.;;..O) (~Z7r.,) (.;2"'~ )
b I H . me:.- .
_ . ~1t.{.,3Z; ---
I -
7-" /::..r
(31)
(6-;.50)
uDe.-.t..s,-.a. rl<t:.it!:/.' '-Tt'..;.c.~;~la'::'~'l
i-
S
L-l!:ona.rd
,
f\.l
t'..
-:i-
~
I tp5L//
---
--_.._.._..__.----~_..-.-._- ..-
3
.'"
, ~
-.- ---- ._-
."
,
:0('
~
,/.' ij"
(t.)
~"'~ I
-':;...---
..;...::
~t
'"
-
~ot>> fJdcb):Hn--Pyf!.J 7W
~,. 1;,0 un (efiYLl.IJl:!J
rvWl.' .
.~/.
\ '.
\: I
/,-," -'j
,..s
(I) ,~
./.~..\ I %
,~---I ,., '"
)-:p:j(-e. St=o-biliJ ~
J..otNuu: fo.D8~.
unl~" e-I ~(LJ
--:tcu-nl ~ ~ (J.J.
~ifl~
p' --~'
,
....... ..:"".J..:'::({.~- .~:':. ......
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
October 15, 1991
Discussion Items
~
:~~~r~OR
BV/I}
/
ITEM
NO.4
Sketch Plan -
Wayne Holmberg
BY: Andover Review Committe
The City Council is requested to review the proposed sketch plan
of Wayne Holmberg.
The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the sketch plan
and their comments are as follows:
General Comments:
* The proposed sketch plan is located in an R-1 Single Family
Rural zoning District with a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres.
Seven lots are being proposed.
* Lots 1 and 7 will require driveway access onto 170th Lane NW.
Ward Lake Drive is designated and has been constructed as a
MSA street.
* All lots will require to meet Ordinance 10, Section 9.06 a(3)
which relates to lot size requirements and buildable area.
* The length of the cul-de-sac exceeds the maximum (500 ft.)
allowed by the ordinance. Proposed length is approximately
960 feet. The ARC discussed the options for planned streets
to adjacent parcels. It is very possible that the proposed
cul-de-sac could be extended either north or south (or both)
as the properties appear to be developable (see Ordinance 10,
Section 9.01 c). The ARC is recommending that the street at
the east end of 170th Lane NW be extended north and south to
adjacent properties and temporary cul-de-sacs be constructed.
Another concern the ARC has is the 1/10 4/40 that may be
required by Metro Council. If this area was to be required,
the property on the north side of the Holmberg property is at
10 acres and the south property is 20 acres, which would most
likely subdivided to 10 acres by metes and bounds description
and would have frontage on Ward Lake Drive. Therefore, a
permanent cul-de-sac would be the only solution.
COUNCIL ACTION
.-./
" MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
o
* The developer and/or owner will be required to obtain all
necessary permits (DNR, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Lower
Rum River WMO and any other agency which may be interested in
the site).
* The developer is required to meet City Ordinances 8 and 10 and
all other applicable ordinances.
Note: There are existing accessory buildings that may be
required to be removed.
Planning and zoning Commission Comments:
The Commission discussed the options regarding the ultimate
extension of the street either going north-south. The consensus
was that there was some hesitancy to require the street to go
north due to the existing trees. The consensus of the Commission
for the street to go south was only to provide an easement or
dedication and not construct the street. A similar situation
occurred recently near Kensington Estates where the developer
was not required to pay for the streets from Red Oaks Addition
that were not completed to the property line because the streets
were outside the plat. In the recent past, the City has been
requiring the developers to construct streets to the boundary of
the plat. It is recommended by staff to continue requiring
streets to be constructed to the boundary of the plat.
~
...J
";:"~C.<""f"~"'.""'",,,\
/'iIL
iji \
,.,'..... , '."
;% fJ
.~\ ~
1..
.'.,.,
,.~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NQ D1scussion Item
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
October 15, 1991
~5.M Sketch Plan - The
~ Meadows of Round Lake
..J,.~
APP OVgsOR
AG ~
-I
BY:
Andover Review Committee BY:
to review the proposed sketb( plan
The City Council is requested
of The Meadows of Round Lake.
The Andover Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the sketch plan
and their comments are as follows (but are not limited to the
following) :
General Comments:
1. The proposed sketch plan is located in an R-1* Manufacturing
Housing Zoning District. The developer is proposing a R-4
single Family-Urban density. It is recommended the rezoning
take place along with the preliminary plat public hearing.
One-hundred eighty-two lots are being proposed.
2. All lots will be accessing on city streets.
3. All lots will require to meet Ordinance 10, Section 9.06 a(l)
which relates to lot size requirements. The front 100 feet
of the lot shall be buildable which is a standard the City
has been using for sewer and water lots. The Shoreland
Management Ordinance 71 will have an effect on lots that are
1000 feet from the ordinary high water mark of Round Lake.
Ordinary High Mark has been established at elevation 866.4.
This elevation will need to be indicated on the preliminary
plat. In discussing the definition of a riparian lots with
Tom Hovey, Area Hydrologist for the DNR, Lots 13-50 of Block
1 are not considered riparian lots.
4. Grading and filling within the Shoreland Overlay District
where the slope of the land is toward a protected water or a
watercourse leading to a protected water must be authorized
by a permit. This permit may be the grading, drainage and
erosion plan approved by the City. There will be conditions
that must apply as identified in Ordinance 71, Section IV B
1-4.
COUNCIL ACTION
"-
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'."/
Page Two
October 15, 1991
The Meadows of Round Lake
,~
5. The Flood plain Ordinance 50 will be in effect. The 100 year
flood elevation will be required to be identified on the
preliminary plat for Round Lake and the other wetland areas
adjacent to the development. The areas adjacent to the
development are identified as General Flood Plain. Ordinance
50, Section 6.2 discusses conditional uses. In this section,
the Planning and zoning Commission shall determine whether
the proposed use is in the floodway or flood fringe using
procedures established in Section 10.43. In reviewing
Section 10.43 it appears that the adjacent areas are flood
fringe which then Section 5.13 (Flood Fringe District) would
apply.
6. The length of the cul-de-sac of Eldorado Street NW is
approximately 1300 feet. The maximum allowed is 500 feet per
Ordinance 10. The developer has discussed a possible
crossing with the DNR through the DNR Protect wetland to Co.
Rd. No. 116. The DNR is concerned that the crossing does not
take place because there is other locations for the traffic
to leave or enter the development.
7. The Fire Department and Public Works Department are
recommending the cul-de-sacs on the west side be connected
for circulation and maintenance reasons.
8. 147th Avenue NW from the west is not constructed to the
property being developed. This will need to be addressed by
the City Council
9. The proposed 143rd Avenue NW encroaches into pleasant Oaks
Park.
10. 145th Circle NW will be required to be changed to 145th Lane
or Avenue. The Building Department will review to ensure the
street names are correct.
11. The developer and/or owner will be required to obtain all
necessary permits (DNR, u.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Lower
Rum River WMO and any other agency which may be interested in
the site).
Notes: There is a large DNR Protected wetland 610 W on the
west and south side of the development and DNR 89 P
(Round Lake) on the east side. In addition there is
a large area of National Wetlands which is regulated
by the u.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Lower Rum
River WMO will have a interest in the development
because Round Lake is classified as a Class A Water
Quality Management Level. Permits will be required
from this organization.
12. The ARC is recommending that necessary drainage and utility
\ easements will be necessary from both the Nedegaard and
,_) Sonsteby properties as part of the preliminary plat and
dedication be made on the final plat.
13. The developer is required to meet City Ordinances 8 and 10
and all other applicable ordinances.
o
-)
Page Three
October 15, 1991
The Meadows of Round Lake
Remember: This has not been studied by Staff in detail as most
of the detail will be reviewed with the preliminary
plat process.
Planning and Zoning Commission Comments:
The Commission expressed their concern in regards to the length
of Eldorado Street which is approximately 1300 feet. It was
recommended if all possible that Eldorado Street be extended to
the south to Co. Rd. 116. See item #6.
,~
. .."~'<"(,'"''~'~''''''\.\'''''
"",~
l' \
;i !J
'~, I'
'\ ,;[
i... I
" J
-1",~'jjjli,I'#'"
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
October 15, 1991
Discussion Items
Engineering
#
APP:~VIj'FOR
AG\_ ^
\
BY: /.
J
ITEM
NO. 6,
Kelsey Estates Final
Plat
Todd J. Haas
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the final plat for
Kelsey Estates (Phase V of the Andover West preliminary plat) as
requested by Jerry and Carol Windschitl in Section 19 & 20-32-24.
Comments:
* The ARC needs some direction as to the dedicated walkway
width which accesses to Kelsey-Round Lake Park at the east end
of 151st Avenue NW cul-de-sac. The developer is proposing a
20 foot wide walkway. At the October 3, 1991 Joint City
Council/Park and Recreation Commission meeting, City Staff was
made aware of the parking that may be required as part of
receiving the grant. It is staff's understanding that there
was a comment at the August 20, 1991 City Council meeting that
a 30 foot access is acceptable. The City Council should give
the staff direction so that the ARC can continue reviewing the
preliminary plat requirements.
* In reviewing the street plan and profile, the north end of
Eldorado Street does not indicate a temporary cul-de-sac which
is a request the Fire and Public Works Departments have made.
The City Council has an option to require the developer to
escrow for the cul-de-sac. A Development Contract should be
considered by the City Council.
* In reviewing the Final Plat, the property that is shown as
exception between 152nd Lane NW and Park 2 is owned by Jerry
and Carol Windschitl. This exception lot meets or exceeds the
lot size requirements in R-1 Zoning District. A drainage
ditch has been constructed on the north property line of Park
2. The preliminary plat of Andover West indicates this
exception area will be dedicated as park property. It is
recommended that the City Council discuss with the developer
as to what the expectations are for this parcel.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
,~ TO
SECOND BY
,J
Other Comments:
1. The City Attorney presenting a favorable title option.
2. Security to cover legal, engineering, street sign and
installation costs as determined by the City Engineer.
3. The developer provide a performance bond or a one-year
warranty escrow as determined for the street and storm sewer
improvement as determined by the City Engineer.
4. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site
which is to be determined by the City Engineer or if the site
is completed, a letter from the developer's engineer that
lots and streets are graded according to the grading plan
submitted and approved by the City. (Developer has an option
to enter into a development contract. It is staff's
understanding that the grading and certification by the
developer's engineer will be complete prior to signing of the
final plat).
5. Street lights costs to be paid to Anoka Electric Cooperative.
Costs to be determined by Anoka Electric Cooperative.
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
,j
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF KELSEY ESTATES
AS BEING DEVELOPED BY JERRY AND CAROL WINDSCHITL IN SECTION 19 &
20-32-24.
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preliminary plat of
Andover West ; and
WHEREAS, the developer has presented the final plat of
Kelsey Estates
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed such plat for conformance
with the preliminary plat; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City
Andover to hereby approve the final plat of
contingent upon receipt of the following:
1. The City Attorney presents a favorable title opinion.
Council of the City of
Kelsey Estates
2. Security to cover legal, engineering, street sign and installation
costs as determined by the City Engineer.
3. The developer provide a performance bond or a one-year warranty
escrow as determined by the City Engineer.
4. The developer escrow for the uncompleted grading of the site which
is to be determined by the City Engineer or if the site is
completed, a letter from the developer's engineer that lots and
streets are graded according to the grading plan submitted and
approved by the City.
5. Street lights costs to be paid to Anoka Electric Cooperative.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
day of
, 19
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
~
r1n n: ::"e.rr& Wif'clschi-+\.
427.043S"
Regular City Council Meeting
'\ Minutes - August 20. 1991
_) Page 9
KELSEY ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT - TEMPORARY TURNAROUND
Jerrv Windschitl. developer of Kelsev Estates - reviewed the issue
as noted in this evening's Resident Forum <See Pages 1 and 2). He has
no argument bringing the street to the boundary. but he does not agree
with putting a ful I-sized cuI de sac at the end. He was willing to
pul I the road and cuI de sac down and provide a walkway easement
to the park between the lots. Mr. Schrantz stated the preliminary plat
has a street going to the end of the boundary plus a temporary
turnaround. It is not a parking lot. Turnarounds are required in
other plats. The Staff asked the Park Board whether they wanted the
road pul led up or to continue it to the boundary as proposed. The Park
Board stated they wanted it to the boundary with the turnaround.
Frank Stone. Public Works Supervisor. cautioned against closing off
all access to the park along the west side. There must be some
abi 1 ity to turn equipment around at the end of the road. If there is
no cuI de sac. he feared the residents will come in asking for "No
Parking" signs along the road because people will park in the road to
access the park.
MOTION by McKelvey, Seconded by Smith. that the cuI de sac be
pulled back from the park and that a pathway be put in for walking
into the park. DISCUSSION: It was noted that without this road, it
is about 1500 feet between streets that border the park. Mr. Haas
noted the proposal requires an update of the preliminary plat, noting
some of the potential problems of shortening the street and adding a
permanent cuI de sac. Mr. Windschitl stated it is a lengthy process
to update a preliminary plat. suggesting instead that the adjustments
be made. on the grading plan. Mr. Haas argued the preliminary plat
needs to be changed so it and the final plat coincide with what is out
there.
:f
AMENDMENT TO MOTION by Perry. Seconded by Smith, that the
preliminary plat be revised and reviewed by the ARC Committee.
DISCUSSION: Attorney Hawkins advised that normally the preliminary
plats are corrected to reflect such changes to be sure that all
ordinance requirements are still met.
VOTE ON AMENDMENT: Carried on a 4-Yes. i-Absent <Jacobson) vote.
VOTE ON MOTION: Carried on a_~-Yes. i-Absent <Jacobson) vote.
AIR COMPRESSOR ACQUISITION/FIRE DEPARTMENT
Captain Jim Pierson. Chairman of the Sma I I Equipment Committee. asked
for Council approval to solicit bids for breathing air equipment for
the two new fire stations.
)
"
MOTION by Smith. Seconded by Perry. that we let bids for the Fire
Department's breathing air equipment. Motion carried on a 4-Yes,
i-Absent <Jacobson) vote.
@)
.~
_~i_.",_.";---Ill:'"C-'c''"!'"",,
".>~';' ">"",
,l" ,
,!~' \
~ ~
" ,~
.t i"
'; . ,if
"';,~ AT
"q-~~##
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
October 15, 1991
ITEM
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning .~
David L. carlberg
City Planner
BY:
~~"
AGENDA S,ECTION .
NQ D1Scusslon Items
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to review the proposed
amendment to Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05 (B)(I), relating to
accessory structures and limiting the ground coverage on parcels
with more than one acre to that of the principal structure. The
Council should review the attached staff report presented at the
September 24, 1991 Planning and zoning Commission meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning & zoning Commission on September 24, 1991 made the
motion to recommend denial of the proposed ordinance amendment.
The Commission found that there was no reason to amend Section
4.05 (B)(I) since no concrete information was presented to warrant
an amendment.
The Council should consult the Planning and zoning Commission
minutes dated September 24, 1991 that are included in their packet
materials.
COUNCIL ACTION
:J
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
~'C'_~':'~ ';.'.:j"_~:~'~.
-J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST F,ORPLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
September 24, 1991
AGENDA ITEM
5. Public Hearing
Amend Ord. No. 8
Sec. 4.05(B)(1)
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
~
BY: 'G
REQUEST
. ..'
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the
proposed amendment to Ordinance No. a~ .sect~?p 4.05(B)(1).
SECTION 4.05(B)(1)
Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05(B)(1), Accessory Building and
Structures, states "The accessory buildings on a residential
parcel with a lot area of five (5 a.) acres or less, but more than
one (1 a.) acre, shall not exceed the total square footage of land
cover of the principal structure.
Note: At this time, any area larger than five (5 a.) acres is
regulated by Section 6.02, which limits the total ground coverage
of all structures to 20 percent of the total area of the parcel.
This amendment was brought to the attention of the Planning
Department by the Building Department. Dave Almgren, Building
Official, has informed Staff that the intent of Section 4.05(B)
was to limit the square footage of accessory structures on parcels
of land with more than one (1 a.) acre to the total square
footage of land cover of the principal structure.
The amendment will accomplish the intent as indicated above. The
proposed amendment is attached f9r Commi?qi9n.review.
,)
)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORD NO. 8
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.8, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1971;
ORDINANCE NO. 8F, EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 19, 1980; ORDINANCE NO. 81,
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 21, 1980; ORDINANCE NO. 8U, EFFECTIVE JULY 19,
1983; AND ORDINANCE NO. 8000, EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 1, 1988;
ORDINANCE NO. 8QQQ, EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 2, 1991 KNOWN AS THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No.8, effective January 1, 1971; Ordinance No. 8F,
effective February 19, 1980; Ordinance No. 81, effective October
21, 1980; Ordinance No. 8U, effective July 19, 1983; Ordinance No.
8000, effective November 1, 1988; Ordinance No. 8QQQ, effective
April 2, 1991 are hereby amended as follows:
SECTION 4.05
ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND.STRUCTURES.
(B) No accessory building in a residential area shall exceed the
height of the principal structure except subject to Section 4.06
(F) and Section 8.21.
(1) The accessory buildings on a residential parcel with a lot
area of i~Ye-+5-aT+-aefee-ef-~eeeT-b~t more than one (1 a.)
acre, shall not exceed the total square footage of land
cover of the principal structure.
(2) The accessory buildings on a residential parcel with a lot
area of one (1 a.) acre or less, shall not exceed seventy-
five (75%) percent of the square footage of land cover of
the principal structure.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this ____ day
of , 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
. '\
-~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will hold
a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can be
heard, on Tuesday, September 24, 1991 at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to consider amendments to
Ordinance No.8, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Andover.
Said amendment to Section 4.05 (B)(l), Accessory Buildings and
Structures, would limit the land cover of accessory buildings on
residential parcels with a lot area over one (1 a.) acre to that
of the square footage of land cover of the principle structure.
As deemed necessary, additional sections of the Ordinance may be
amended relating to the sections stated above.
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
[;cia.
Victor~a Volk, City
Clerk
Publication dates:
September 13, 1991
September 20, 1991
)
.J
i;i"~f'.""'."~~""""""\\.
~,"'.'~. t.l
"~. Jj
~i,\, i'
\. ,/
'''''. .P
~.~.-.#oJ>.,.
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
October 15, 1991
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Items
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
BY: City planner
ITEM
NO.
Amend Ord. No. 10
Sec. 9.03, 9.06, 11.01
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to review the proposed
amendments to Ordinance No. 10, the Subdividing and Platting
Ordinance, Sections 9.03(g), 9.06(a)(3) and 11.01(a). The Council
should review the attached staff report presented at the September
24, 1991 Planning and zoning Commission meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning & zoning Commission on September 24, 1991 made the
motion to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance amendments.
The Commission proposed additional changes to Section 11.0l(a),
extending the filing of the final plat from six months to one year
of the preliminary plat.
The Council should consult the Planning and zoning Commission
minutes dated september 24, 1991 that are included in their packet
materials.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
,
'.-, TO
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORD NO. 10
;
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 10, THE SUBDIVISION AND
PLATTING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No. 10 is hereby amended as follows:
9.03g Cul-de-sacs. The maximum lenqth of cul-de-sac streets
shall be five hundred (500') feet measured along the centerline
from the intersection the center of the cul-de-sac area. Each
cul-de-sac shall have a terminus of nearly circle shape with a
minimum right of way diameter of one hundred twenty (120.0') feet
and a minimum roadway diameter of ninety three (93') feet in the
Urban Service Area and eRe-BHRe~ee-+!GGTGL+-€eet-~R-tBe-~H~a!-
a~ea9 the Rural Service Area. Temhorary cul--de~sacs shall be
requi red in all new subdivlSions t at have made-provfSlonsfClr the
continuation of future streets for ad'oinin areas. Each
temporary cu - e-sac s a e requ1re to ave a m1n1mum roadw~
diameter of eight* (80') feet. The property line at~e
intersection of t e turn a-round and the straight portion of the
street shall be rounded at a radius of not less than twenty
(20.0') feet.
\
)
9.06a(3). Areas Lacking Mllnicipal sanitary Sewer within the Urban
Service Area. In areas lacking municipal sanitary sewer within
the Metropolitan Urban Service Area, no lot shall be developed for
residential purposes unless it contains a minimum of 108,900
square feet, of which 39,000 square feet of contiguous land area
is buildable with a minimum width of at least one hundred fifty
(150') feet and a minimum depth of one hundred fifty (150') feet.
Said lot shall be re~uired to have a finished trade of at least
six and one-half (6. ') feet above the seasona high water m~
and shall also re6uire the lowest floor to be a minImum of three
(3') feet above t e mottled soils or one (1') foot above the
desi nated or desi ned one hundred (100) ear frooa: elevation
w 1C ever 1S 19 er. Sa1 ot s a a so ave aRe-Bas a width of
at least three hundred (300') feet at the building setback
line. For lots which abutt a cul-de-sac, the lot width at the
setback line is to be a minimum of one hundred sixty (160') feet.
Two lots maximum are allowed at the end of each cul-de-sac
regarding lot width. The preliminary plat shall show a feasible
plan for future re-subdivision by which lots may be re-subdivided
to meet the size and dimension standards of lots in areas served
by municipal sewer. These provisions shall not apply to plats
approved by the City prior to October 17, 1978.
11.01a. Filing of Final Plat. Within 9~*-+6+-meRtBs one (1) year
following approval of the preliminary plat, unless an extension of
time is requested in writing by the subdivider and granted by the
Council, the subdivider shall file seven (7) copies of the final
plat with the Clerk and shall pay a filing fee thereof as set by
Council resolution. The final plat shall incorporate all changes
required by the Council, and in all other respects it shall
conform to the preliminary plat as approved. If the final plat is
not filed within si*-+6+-msRtBs one (1) year following approval of
the preliminary plat, the approvar-Qf the preliminary plat shall
be considered void.
Page Two
Ordinance No. 10 Amendments
\
)
The final plat may constitute only that portion of the preliminary
plat which the subdivider proposes to record and develop at that
time, provided that such portion shall conform to all requirements
of this Ordinance, and provided further that the remaining portion
or portions of the preliminary plat not proposed to be rec~~L-
~eve~ed and submitted as a final plat, or granted an extensIon,
slial e subject to the right of the City to adopt new or revisea
platting and subdivision re ulations and shall be subject to
review by t e An over RevIew CommIttee ARC).
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this day
of , 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
\
)
. .
J
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST F,ORPLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
September 24, 1991
AGENDA .dTEM
Q)). Public Hearing
Amend Ord. No. 10
Sec. 9.03, 9.06
& 11. 01.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
David L. carlberg
City Planner
BY:
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
~
BY:
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission' ~s asked to review the
proposed amendments to Ordinance No. 10, the Subdividing and
Platting Ordinance, Sections 9.03(g), 9.06(a)(3) and 11.01(a).
SECTION 9.03(g)
Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.03(g), Cul-de-sacs. Shall
require cul-de-sacs in the Rural Service Area to have a minimum
roadway diameter of ninety-three (93') feet. Temporary cul-de-
sacs shall be required in all new subdivisions that have made
provisions for the continuation of future streets for adjoining
areas. Each temporary cul-de-sac shall be required to have a
minimum roadway diameter of eighty (80') feet.
NOTE: At this time, Section. 9.03(g) does not address
temporary cul-de-sacs and requires a one-hundred (100') foot
minimum roadway diameter in rural areas.
Section 9.06(a)(3)
Ordinance No. 10, Section 9.06(a)(3), Lots. Shall require
residential lots lacking municipal sanitary sewer outside the
Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) to be required to have a
minimum finished grade of at least six and one-half (6.5') feet
above the seasonal high water mark and shall also require the
lowest floor to be a minimum of three (3') feet above mottled
soils or one (1') foot above the designated or designed one
hundred (100) year flood elevation whichever is higher.
NOTE: The amendment to Section 9.06(a)(3) will clarify what a
buildable lot is that lacks municipal sanitary sewer outside the
MUSA.
Section 11.01(a)
Ordinance No. 10, Section 11.01(a), Filing of Final Plat. Shall
require remalnlng portions of any preliminary plat not proposed to
. ~ be recorded, developed and submitted as a final plat, or granted
,~ an extension, to be subject to the right of the City to adopt new
or revised platting and subdivision regulations and shall be
subject to review by the Andover Review Committee (ARC).
J
Page Two
Ordinance 10 Amendments
September 24, 1991
This amendment clarifies the City's right to adopt and enforce new
regulations on remaining portions of preliminary plats not
proposed to be recorded, developed and and submitted as part of
the final plat or granted an extension. The amendment also adds
the review by the Andover Review Committee.
The proposed amendments are attached for Commission review.
)
,
.~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORD NO. 10
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 10, THE SUBDIVISION AND
PLATTING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ordinance No. 10 is hereby amended as follows:
the
of
)
11.01a. Filing of Final Plat. Within six (6) months following
approval of the preliminary plat, unless an extension of time is
requested in writing by the subdivider and granted by the Council,
the subdivider shall file seven (7) copies of the final plat with
the Clerk and shall pay a filing fee thereof as set by Council
resolution. The final plat shall incorporate all changes required
by the Council, and in all other respects it shall conform to the
preliminary plat as approved. If the final plat is not filed
within six (6) months following approval of the preliminary plat,
the approval of the preliminary plat shall be considered vnin_
Page Two
Ordinance No. 10 Amendments
,)
The final plat may constitute only that portion of the preliminary
plat which the subdivider proposes to record and develop at that
time, provided that such portion shall conform to all requirements
of this Ordinance, and provided further that the remaining portion
or portions of the preliminary plat not proposed to be recorded,
develobed and submitted as a final plat, or ranted an extension,
shall e subject to the right of the City to a opt new or reVlse
platting and subdivision re ulations and shall be sub'ect to
review by t e An over ReVlew Committee (ARC .
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this ____ day
of , 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
"
,-_.J
l' ,"
-)
.."~r<"i''''''-'''''''''''',,.
,'?' 'i'\
qrl
';~~ l
'" I
,~,- , #'~
'.~J;";#~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
0(214
ffJt((,h1
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Oct. 15. 1991
Engineering
ITEM Accept streets/
NO'<\,Genthon Ponds
Todd Haas
BY:
The City Council is requested to consider releasing 100% of the
Letter of Credit and approving the resolution accepting the
streets for Genthon Ponds Addition as requested by the Developer,
Roger Hokanson.
Attached is the General Findings that has been prepared by Braun
Intertec Pav., The Consultant selected between the City and the
developer.
In general, Braun Intertec deflection tests results indicate the
pavement in Genthon Ponds Addition have a 7 ton capacity which is
greater than the 5 ton design capacity. 7 ton capacity refers to
the spring thaw or an excessively wet season that the spring load
restriction should be strictly enforce. The City Engineer
normally would post streets as a 4 or 5 ton during the spring
thaw.
Other Comments:
In addition, the
100% performance
Braun Intertec.
developer will be willing to provide a 2 year
pond and participate in half of the costs for
(The City would participate in the other 50%.)
staff would also recommend the developer have agreement with his
builderslcontractors regarding the axle loads and do not allow
stationary heavy loads on any portion of the streets within the
development.
MOTION BY
~
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
, .
~J
~
~
CITY OT ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL STREET CONSTRUCTION OF GENTHON
PONDS ADDITION AS BEING DEVELOPED BY HOKANSON DEVELOPMENT IN
SECTION 01-32-24.
WHEREAS, the developer has completed the streets of Genthon
ponds Addition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to hereby approve the final street construction
of Genthon Ponds Addition contingent upon providing the
following:
1. Developer provide a 100% warranty bond for the first 2
years for the streets.
2. Developer is responsible for 50% and the city is
responsible for 50% for Braun Intertec consulting fees.
3. The developer have an agreement with the
builderslcontractors regarding the axle loads.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 15th day
of October, 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
KENNETH D. ORTELL - MAYOR
VICTORIA VOLK - CITY CLERK
':~
'!
,
,I
'J
..----
OM 3RAUH IHTERTEC PAU.
(MOH Ha. 14.' 91 16: a7
PAGE 17
HO.5
GENERAL FINDINGS
The deflection test results indicate the pavement in Genthon Ponds have a 7-ton capacity which is
greater than the S-ton design capacity. Even though the pavement is expected to withstand the
deflection: caused be a.7-ton axle load, we emphasize the pavement is still vulnerable to heavy loads,
particularly during spring thaw and wet perio<ls.
The area surrounding the pavement structure is a consistently moist area with a high water table.
Subgrade soils decrease in strength. when saturated. We normally expect a sandy subgrade to be
about 12,000 to 15,000 psi in tenns of resilient modulus and the test results range between 6,000 and
10,800 psi. Moisture and compaction of the soil are the two main factOrs that effect its strength.
Therefore during spring thaw or an excessively wet season the recommended spring load restriction
should be strictly enforced. During construction in a new housing development, delivery and
construction equipment trucks are often heavily loaded. for this reason the heavy vehicles in excess of
the recommend limit should not be permitted. Vavement surfaces do not withstand stationary heavy
loads well, therefore construction vehicles should practice off road parking.
The pavement structural strength, calculated as an. Effective Granular Equivalent (EGE) thickness, is
consistent with the materiai placed. The short section of Butternut Street from 173rd Street to 173rd
Lane shows slightly more effective strength than the typical section call for. The other two segments
show strength consistent with the typical section thickness.
Expected oerformance of the 9avement:
We expect the performance of the pavement in Genthon Ponds to be typical of low volume streets. If
a:x1e 10adtL are limited.. to; Hong, or less~ lJ1inim;tl breakup is. expected. We expect the pavement to
need a surface treatment in three to five years to control the effects of weathering. This is typical of
low-volume residential streets throughout this area.
PREVIOUS TEST RESULTS
We have been asked to review the test results regarding asphalt thicknesses, mix characteristics, and
densities. We reviewed the information provided us- by Mr. Uldis of Buck Blacktop regarding the
project. Our comments regarding the information are:
Th icknesses:
During the density tests of the Class 5 base, the thickness was determined to be 6 inches, two
inches more than the typical called for. The added base thickness is equivalent to one inch of
asphalt, Structurally, this will make up for the asphalt thickness deficiency. It had beell
noted in a June 27th project note that. the- Class 5 surface at that time was not stable enough
carry construction traffic and that soft conditions had resulted ill a distorted. interface betWeen
the sub grade and Class 5 base.
Th~ asphalt thicknesses were laM than the 1.0 inch minimum thickness called for on the
typical section. Mr. Uldis told. ~ the total. tonnage of asphalt delivered is less than. one.
percent. short of th~ tota1.tonnage: required. foe 2.0 inches: of asphalt. This. was, based on th~
area.. 95% density and Marshall density of the mix provided. We did: not confirm tha.
calculation:. The samples taken, both by GME and the contractor show the thickness to be
typically less than 2.0 inches. A possible explanation for some. of the thickness variation is
the tolerance of the Class 5 base and some of the rutting that was occurring. This may be the
~ reason for the 1.2 inch thicknes$atGMR core 3. Thickness of 1.8 and 1.9 inches were
,
1,:_ ~'"!~:!
L ~, : t
'-)
-~
,
"'-)
'.
OM BRRUN INTERTEC PRU.
(MON)la.14.'9116'08
NO.5
P~GE 18
measured by the contractor on either side of the thin core.
Densities:
Th~ asphalt densities were measured at three locations by GME and later at five locatioll$ by
the contractor. Cor~ 2 taken b~ GME was on the cold joint at centerline and was tested to be
at 90 % compaction. Sampling for densities are normally not taken within a foot of the cold
joint.. The low density at core 3 also corresponds to the low thickness, If the low thickness
is due to distortions of an unstable base and sub grade during paving,. low densities would also
b~ likely. Five other samples were taken by the contractor, Sample 5 was cut from a piece
of pavement removed for a repair and should not be used for density measurements. Samples
obtained in this manner can distort, lowering the measured densities. The remainder of the
density tests range between 92 percent and 98 percent with four of the results between 96 and
98 percent. Overall, the densities on this project are typical to better than those achieved on
low-volume pavement projects.
Mix characteristics:
The gradations are within the acceptable limits of the 1991 specification requirements for a
Type 41 mix. The typical section referred to "MHD 2141". Although the Minnesota
Highway Department "MRD" has not existed for years, it may be referring to the 1988
MnJDOT specification, in which case, the gradation requirements are different. It should be
noted that gradations are normally rounded to the nearest whole percent.
The asphalt content obtained by GME in an extraction is 5.0 percent. The project mix
formula called for 5.5 percent. Due to a number of reasons, we can not state that the asphalt
content is deficient. The plant is allowed to produce this mix at contents between 5.2 percent
and 5.8 percent, the aggregate may absorb some of the asphalt which can not be extracted,
and inter-laboratory variation in extraction results is 0.8 percent.
CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
We were asked to comment on the responsibility of the city with regards to the project. We can not
comment without a copy of the plat, relevant city code, agreement between the developer and the
city, and other related documents, The responsibilities should be clearly spelled out in such
documents.
. ~;~ : ; r'~' ,.
<..r! ,I t
'lCA/;~""""~"'~"''''\'1;,
,\?'~
'j '\
'\ 1
---> , j
"".. .,..,..
-~~--;~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 15, 1991
\
ITEM
NO.
BY:
Todd J. Haas
A~RbvE D FOR
A
\(P
BI'
/
9,
Genthon Ponds/Accept
streets, Cont.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering ~
",,1
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
Discussion Items
The city Council is requested to discuss the street construction
for Genthon Ponds Addition. Braun Intertec has been selected to
analyze the street and a report will be ready for discussion at
the Tuesday meeting.
'--,
'- MOTION BY
TO
COUNCil ACTION
SECOND BY
,lCA'~"''''"''Y~''''''C,\
(f.....'.
el ~,
'J3 [II'
- ~ .
~- #
,\ .,l
"'"'....,....-/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 15, 1991
( '-
Planning
i?c
~~~D~
BY:, /
/
AGENDA SECIION
NO. sta f, Committee,
Commission
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
/tJ.
Uses in Industrial
District
David L. Carlberg
BY: City Planner
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to discuss whether a towing
service should be allowed as a permitted use in the Industrial
District. The towing service is to be located at 1724 Bunker Lake
Boulevard NW. Currently, the City does not specifically state
that towing services are permitted. However, the City does allow,
as a permitted use, transportation terminals or motor freight
terminals. The towing service, it would seem, would be a similar
type use.
The operator of the towing service is proposing to provide a
wooden fence for screening and security purposes. Any structures
constructed would be required to meet the standards established in
Ordinance No. 78, Commercial Building Construction.
staff is concerned with what types of vehicles the towing
operation will provide service to;
1. Will it operate as a towing service to cars that are illegally
parked or will it also tow vehicles that have been in
accidents?
2. How long will cars remain on the premises? Vehicles damaged
in accidents may remain on the property for a considerable
amount of time while insurance claims are being filed and
processed.
The Council should decide if this is the type of operation desired
for a redevelopment district as is the area south of Bunker Lake
Boulevard.
Continued
COUNCil ACTION
, '\
.J
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
"
Page Two
Uses in Industrial Districts - Towing Service
October 15, 1991
" .;
COUNCIL OPTIONS
1. Allow the towing service to operate as a permitted use.
2. Disallow the towing service.
If the Council disallows the towing service they should state
those reasons for doing so. The Council may also wish to direct
Staff to remove the transportation terminal or motor freight
terminal from Ordinance No.8, Section 7.01, Permitted Uses.
.~)
";CA"~"'''''~''~'''''''~''
..- -<or,
-,? -~
t \
'\\ ~'
-J"l' ;:
T..,~___ _ ."oJ'
~i!!l.~~'i~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 15, 1991
ITEM
NO.
Planning Consultant
Compo plan Contract
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
David L. Carlberg
BY: City planner
AGENDA SECIION .
NO. sta f, Comml ttee,
Commission
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to discuss whether the
City should hold the remaining monies in the amount of $1,980.07
until the Consultant, Robert Wuornos of urbanalysis, has completed
the Andover Comprehensive Plan (completed being final product
after Metropolitan Council approval). It is common business
practice to hold five (5%) percent of the total contract amount to
assure the project will be completed.
Note: Mr. Wuornos has been paid through August 31, 1991.
~J
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCil ACTION
SECOND BY
'f>CAr<'j"~""''''''''''',~\
1 ~
i""~.~.'."~'..'. ~l
;1 iii
, i~
\,
-~,
l:~~-:M
\~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
October 15, 1991
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Public Works 6)
Frank stone
BY: BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
staff, Committee, Comm
ITEM
NO.
i;J.
Purchase Motor/Grader
Engine
We are having a problem with the engine in our grader.
using a large amount of oil and it is smoking badly out of
engine breather. We have had the John Deere mechanic look at the
unit. After doing a compression check on the engine only one
cylinder is holding. The standard compression is 350. No.1
cylinder is 340, No.2 cylinder is 320, No.3 cylinder is 360,
No.4 cylinder is 240, No. 5 cylinder is 280, and No.6 cylinder
is 240. The only thing we can do is to rebuild the engine we
have at a cost of $6,266.00 with a guarantee of 6 months or a new
engine for a cost of $8,486.00 with a one year guarantee.
We also have to rebuild the chains on the rear tandoms. This is
about two years over due! The cost is $2,324.00.
For this work to be done the unit will have to be transported to
Mid-ast Mechanical in Burnsville. The round trip estimate cost
is 00.00.
I recommend the new engine and have the rear tandom chains
repairied at the same time. I know this wipes out streets &
Highways and Snow & Ice Vehicle Repair budgets, but we have to
keep this unit going.
New Engine
Tandom Chains
Transportation
Total Repair
$8,486.00
$2,324.00
$400.00
$11,210.00
This unit gets a lot of hours on it in the winter and summer. I
did have it on the 1993 Capital Budget for replacement. If we
replace the engine we might be able to extend it to 1994.
COUNCil ACTION
'\
'.j
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
.'.~"~YCA""""""'"""""''''\.'''
".>' ,,~
t\
~:j. ."
\, I
"\. -/
'~ {Ji-""
"""-""
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
staff, Committee, Comm.
DATE October 15, 1991
"
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT APPRp-Y_f)i FOR
Public Works AGE~
BY: Frank Stone r@ y/'\.J
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ITEM
NO.
/3.
Replace Pump Motor/
Public Works Well
On August 29, 1991 the 20 HP pump motor on our well at Public
works/Fire Department Building burned out. E.H. Renner was
called to repair the system. They placed a 5 horse power pump on
the well temporarily until we decided on what should be done to
correct the problem. The 5 horse motor will handle bathroom,
drinking fountains, etc. but we can not sprinkle the City Park or
fill any trucks.
Please read E.H. Renner's report analysis.
Mr. Schrantz and myself would recommend the installation of the
10 HP pump and motor for $2,353.65. plus installation of an air
release setup bailing of well and rework pump for $2,175.50.
The total package as we understand would be $4,539.15.
The Public Works Budget has a total of $1,290.84 in Line Item 401
& 402. I have not talked to the Fire Department to see if they
have any money in their budget to help or if the balance can come
from the PIR Fund. I will try to have more information for you
the night of this meeting.
COUNCil ACTION
'-
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
-23-1991 08:16 FROM
TO
7558923
P.02/12
l n. Renner 8 Sons
INCORPORATED
WELL DR/LUNG FOR FOUR GEN!:RATlONS
15888 JARVIS STREET H.W. I ELK RIVER. MN 55330
PHONE: (612) 427-6100 I FAX: (612) 427-0533
--
\J
22 September, 1991
CIn OF ANDOVER
1685 Crosstown Blvd
Andover, Minnesota
N.W.
55304
ATTN: Hr. Frank Stone
755-8118
SUBJECT I Repairs Crosstown Fire hall well system
RE I REPoRT & ANAL'tSIS
Dear Mr. Stone,
R.B. RENHER & SONS. IDC. was called upon to investigate an "out of water"
condition at the Crosstown Fire Hall. With the Use of Our meters, We
determined that the 20Hp suhmersib1e motor windings had failed.
SERVICE REPOkT:
Late in the afternoon of the 29th of August, 1991, We removed the 20HP
RED JACKET PUMP and motor from the well and replaced it with a srualler
SHP pump capable of satisfying the needs of the building until further
investigation on the existing pump could be completed.
We tested the RED JAaET model 6-240 in OUr test tanK to find that the
pump was 95'7. up to capacity. We USed one of E.B. RENNER & SORS, nm.
existing 20HP motors for this test.
We ordered out a new 20 HP motor for your system. Last week we assembled
the new motor to YOur existing pump end. During this assembly we noticed
the pump had a rattle to it?? We then disassembled the pump end to
find extensive damage to' the bearings and bowl shaft. It was at that
time, I called you again to discuss the options, . advantages, and disad-
vantages to Our options.
DISCUSSION:
, '\
o
. PAG'R #1
We last serviced this system in August of 1983. During that investigation,
we discovered that the open hole portion of the well had filled from 210f
up to 185ft. This fill-in shut off SOme of the aVa~lable water to th~ I
well. The sand was bailed from the weLl and a test of the aquifer wJa. '/,
performed. (enclosed)
An Equal Opportunity Employer
SEP-23-1991 08:16 FROM
TO
7558923
P.03/12
.'
,J
The test pump showed that the aquifer will produce sand if the well is
pumped in e'tcess of 235 GPM. The amount of pressure on the systems was
recorded at 235gpm and is 40 PSI. This system had been pre~get [onJ
at 40 PSI and [off] at 60 PSI. It was concluded that during either YOur
irrigation pumping or during a fire truck fill mode, the pressure would
drop below 40 PSI enough to over demand the well, loose the air in the
tank, and caUSe the well to produce sand and thus ruin the pump.
In addition, there is no easy way to air up the pressure tank when the
system does become water logged. Thus the system .apid cycles for a
period of time enough to ruin the motor. In Short, the system has been
designed to self-distruct.
OPTIONS:
We have four options to review:
1. Place the new 20 lIP motor recently purchase for youX' e'ti.sting pump
end and return the system back in seX'vice. Cost of new motor is
$1,744.20. Although the cheapest matedal cost, the system is still
in a self-distruct mode. In a short time, the system will be down
with a pump failure.
2. Place the new 20 lIP motoX' recently purchased for your existing pump
end and replace the bearings and bowl shaft prior to placing the system
back into service. Cost of a new motOr is $1,744.20 and cost to
repair pump end and test is $590.00. Total $2,334.20
3. Return the 20 HP motor for a new 15 HP motor. Also replace the pump
end with a new all stainless steel GRVNDFOS pump with the same pumping
capaCity and head characteristics as the original 20 HP RED JACXET
pump. The cost of a new 15 lIP pump and motor is $2,817.75.
5. Return the 20 lIP motor for a new 10 HP motor. Also replace the pump
end with a new all stainless steel GRDNDFOS pump with a lower pumping
capacity and similar head characteristics .as the original 20 HP :asD
JACKET pump. The cost of a new 10 HP pump and motor is'$2,353.65.
RECOMMENDATION:
In our On site evaluation of the system, we need a pump that will provide
enough water to satisfy the building needs at high pressure and still
produce a maximum of 235 GPM at low preSSure for irrigation and fire truck
filling. OPTION #5 provides us the supply that the system demands without
OVer pumping the well. The new 10 lIP pump will produce 125 GPM at 60
PSI and over 225 GPM at 40 PSI. However, it the system does not main-
tain a minimum of atleast 30 PSI, you will over demand the well, cause
the sand to ruin the pump and system, and mOst probably loose the captive
air in the tank as cause water logging of the system.
,J
PAGE #2
SEP-23-1991 08:17 FROM
TO
7558923
P.04/12
,J
The fOllowing is a GALLONS FEll. MINUTE (GPM)
comparison of the three pumps in questions:
lOHP GRutmFOS 15BP GRUNDFOS
Gm/l'D1l GPM/TDH
275/150
250/180
200/225
150/255
vs TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD (!DR)
20BP RED JACKET
CPM/:ro!l
250/120
200/150
150/180
275/156
250/176
200/200
150/224
This smaller pump is cheaper, more responsive to the capacity of the well,
will require less costly maintenance, and still provide you a good w<lter
supply without self distructing. Both the l5HP and 20HP pumps will over
produce the well and cause sanding problems.
We also recommend that the rental pump now in the well be removed and
the well bailed to remove the accumulated sand (if any) that is in the
hole prior to installing the new pump.
If the City chooses to return the 20 HP motor. we have been given aSSur~
ances from the supplier that there would be NO restocking charge if the
motor is returned in good shape.
We also recommend that the system be set up with a bleed down or air re-
lease to ch<lrge the tank with air each time the pump is turned On. We
would also install a float release in the side of the tank to automatically
discharge the air if the system becomes "air logged".
COST ANALYSIS;
We have yet to review what the total costs for this work will be. Our
work involves:
1. Removal of existing 20 HP pump and Install temporary rental pump
2. Purchase necessary equipment
3. Remove rental pump and Bail hole clean of sandstone accumulation.
4. Install permanent equipment and Place back in service & test.
1. Mob to site & check system down, remOve City 20 HP pump & install
temporary pump back into well. Flace system back in service. Return
to shop & check 20HP pump capacity in test stand.
,J
PAGE #3
SEP-23-1991 08:17 FROM
TO
7558923
P.05/12
# of UNIT l'OTAI.
,~ DESCRIP'lION UNITS PRICE EXTENSION
8/29/91
Trip charge 1 L.S. $ 55.00
Labor ~r $50.00/ $ 225.00
overtime 3~hr $25.001 $ 87.50
l>ump truck 2~hr $30.00/ $ 75.00
9/17/91
Check system out for capacity NO CHARGE
2. Purchase necessary equipment SEE OPTIONS {fl-5
3. Remove rental pump and Bail hole clean of sandstone accumulation.
ESTIHATED*
Trip charge 1 L.S. $ 55.00
Labor (operator) 5hrs $50.00/ $ 250.00
(helper) 5hrs $42.00/ $ 210.00
Pump truck 3~hrs $30.00/ $ 105.00
Pump rental 30 days $10.00/ $ 300.00
4. Install pump, air release, place into service & test.
Labor (operator) l~hrs $50.001 $ 75.00
(helper) l~hrs $42.001 $ 63.00
Pump truck Ihr $30.00/ $ 30.00
Air release setup 1 L.S. S 195.00
l'OTAI. WITHOlTt OPTIONS $2.185.50*
*rotal cost will be determined by actual units multiplied by the
established unit price in items ~3 and #4 above.
Enclosed you will find the pump curves for the existing 20 HP REU JACKET,
the 15 HP GRUBDFOS, and the 10 HP GR.UNDFOS pump mentioned above. Also
enclosed you will find the test pump data showing the GPM and sand pumping
relationship.
Please review the above and let me know which option you wish to use.
r will be available at any time to review any of the above information
either on the phone or in your offices.
~s'ncere1~ :Z:~:d~
~: E. Renner, President
R WATER WELl. CONTRACTOR
E.n. RENNER & SOBS. INC.
, " STATE LICENSE #71015
\.~ RER/50/44
ENCLS. .
PAGE #4
SEP-23-1991 08:17 FROM
l ,1,1". , SIBs
INCORPORA'TED)';.';;:;)'",' .... ',' .....
:,. -.....-,n'.....,...\.';.a....;.,.:;.I,J;..._:.,:;.. "." '.
r~- . ...-. ., .
'-- J . . ::/:':. .:t::-(;'~>... .'
::;;~~if~~PJM~~~~i:. bttv ~
....~ontac:t
e>Pcira:t~~' /00V'\. r.
, Hours Cod\!
l). y~ _
I
TO
7558923
P.06/12
WELL ORILLlNG FOR FOUR GENERATIONS
1H88 JARVIS mElT H.W./RK RIVER, IN 55330/(1112)427-6100
POHPWORK .
~ILY REPOR~I
~ll ,
Phone ,
. Ilolper
,
','1
'.'
.\
01 t~. 9 -::;Fi-.91
.' J. 1<
Wl:Lt;'DwmR (g
TypO'of'PUlliP
Lengtli,'Pulled/Sct
. Sleeve.:: . .
'..
"
Hours Code
..JQb Sito
Travel
Shop
Equip.ent used on sito
Hcd1nA_
lOT
5T
OnlER
DEPnI
[] L.S. Turbino [] Submersiblo
Coltlnn 1.0.
Projection
STATIC ",^TER lEVEl.
[] Other
Shaft 0.0.
nowl Projett1on
" '.
'<t., .;". .,: ,::
. HOURS"\;'OrSCRIPTIOH 'OF WORK
-"..c-
. . ..~~':;:R1ci.Mobl1zat1on/Demobi1 hat10n
-
.':..;rUg',: ,~y.
~Ri9,Standby
.....'- .:,,",""',.. ..
. .....::iLShop,Load/Unlolld.
..... -'l, .'
. :,"h'JobLoad/Unload
- .
',:i'~'!)H~oniie'efPUlllp & Moto,.
-
, ~':,";RCGlOvc\PUlllps'
-,'"",...,.'".,
'. .~:/;:"I'nstal):.
-.,...,...:." .
. .' " ..~::Conricct!. PUmp & Motor
:.~.:..,::'-''":,.,'~{.,..':.,.'...
'. ....,.;"".Dllfll^1,..:Sweep
. .:.'i:!~,:;,~'Sfte;.;Cl~~~,; Up, .
., '. :::::;'))~~Atf~lccliiiP~'s'so..:. . '. '
.... ~;' >::-; ,~tWl~"C~~i$iamtbY'
~: .."., ,.~'~~ '~ ';'4~~J" ~ . .
.~~~..>.... .
... '~i~t~: ,. ;~,>
",...,..,i~~ t
, ,:-.,.~,\.:~'.~t~..
J'"''''
'..):f:"'~'
. .....; ~<...;':~:~:~
:'~:(;:i;~;~(j~
.... ..:p=~CEieISCMREcl
OWNER . r '. . .
~~'6~ p~
.' ,
.~. ,.....- -.
. :i~.:.":. '~~~;;.'./~ ':~.j.;');;~~: ;,~.~~':;;;~~,~;~:"
SEP-23-1991 08:18 FROM
-fl;illwWDD@f ffJ $m08~
TO
755:3923
P.07/12
All
WEl.1.. Off/l..l../NG trOff FOUff GENEffATIONS
6300 Industry Ave. N. W., Anaka, Minn. 55303, (812) 427-6100.
-
V~
,-J
WELL LOG
MAP CODe N..74
:.." .,
Date Stlli-tid' ,..' 12 > APRIL
19 79
batt Completed ~3 JULY
19 7f:l
. .,;",~...
Owner, o~&~~acto;:' Andover Pu b 1 1 e
".",.
Service Bldq .
"~~.,- ~
Blv~ ~~n~~, MN
Addreu
178, C~os~town S'vA
Job Location:' :~" ZR5 Cron!:,;tnwn
';5303
T32n R24~' $22
Lot ~ ' , . . Bloel('
City
ANDOVER
County
ANO~A
State of Minnesota
-:'-.; .
Well: :,:/2:2:2c~ble Tool ~Rotary _ Driven
...'....,''\, . .,':
. ~ - ~;
Cased wit"" 6' 'inCh _ PI: -X- T&C -1J 0 Ft.
Feet of Ot>enHole ,,' 94. FinIShed in St lawr~nt"@
Driller: STODOLA ~!;t1 mm r TNt; reI' , TNC.
Total Depth of Well
'M
Ft. from grade
'":,
. Tested 'at. :.' '. .', i~~lIons per'mln.
.
Statio Water Level
'6
Ft.
..~','~ "'"'.'f':",:.",/. ..t.~<;:.:,'
SCreen.''....:-- ,,' NONE,:..
Size .', ,:.~:.y.'.:dla.':s
Drawn down of
feet.
.'
ft.. Make
Slot or Guage
?O HP. .....2!l8. Volts -3-PhaS& TYPt <:IIh
Tank "00 9:0 1
Motor Serial No~;4479 date Pump Serial No,
J M7a?5~~
~. F'. 7Q. 0 amp'l Drop Pipe
7~
feet
, ':'\~~~~1~f(;;:!.;fu~~ti:;;2~',;;::"
Si~e 3" '.' blle . CapacitY of pump ~~C; ra G.P.M. Date Installed .1111. y 19!E
128
Offset ~R ft. Material .SiZt ~ Incl1
Colo, of Stamd ended ToUI
Tblcktl~ R.InI,ka
Formation Depth Depth of
l=orm~lon
'.
..... ."
.. .: : .~ ...,~ ~A~;,.;~o(f'~..~, l,...I,~".:'~.;;.~:\".. ',: . .,...
" .""'....,Ihn'<,"~."''''v..".,.., ....
",' ","~ :~~~~;-:;;f.~,t~:r::'if~{~t}o:t~i;~~:;,~., :;',
".,,:. >';\ .
~ ....:..
. ~, . . .
'-::,'. .
..--..-
. '.~ .. . .
. - ..,~'/i~~,';~,~;LLS:,:,;;t.j~;L~~~&i~~:~:;C'; :.. -..: ,," .:;'~~;.,,;~
SEP-23-1991 08:19 FROM
TO
7558923
P.08/12
,;il~;;;i, '((~;~I~hilii~;'I{j?~::I:)'''}';&\ ~ill'"
::{{~~,. "...~~i=.......,""'~",..,. .... "~;tll,:IIi1J IJ
. .
WELL ORII.L.ING rOR FOUR GENERATIONS . '.
'. 8300 IndustryAY8. N. W..Anilh;Minn:S5303,(812) 427.8100"
~: --- /~:,:~\-,)::,:~:~~~~r~i~~/t;)t:~;~~'j:;'~~~',~.r~~~;:~~ti:;f'k ;/:,;" ::'~~, ::".:: ~.,,"
.~. "';(: P ROJ"ECT:'i;~G/,~Andover; Ffre Hall
,";:i),B~(ITti'~~~i+if,~~~!:~:'::i~S;t:~tie: ~ate r Leva 1: 17.1
-, "" ',._;,:,-::-:'o:.:i:<:;,~l;. ':'f"~>",.,,,,".". '>.'~>~:;:::" .,' ':'"
, " ,;":'::}~J~~~~ajt~~~~t~~:~~:s',i.;S'{:' ,:
.... ;, _.':H~~,gl.:1L~;~fr ~'_. _
.... ",,"",.l""':l("~'" ~~~rY.>.~".-:,~ I'U\"W1J11i IJI(I\W
'.", ~.;:nT:lt,lI~:": : ,~..'G'-:p..m~...; .sl':EV' EL "., DQW;'
" . ~ .f,,,"... '0 _ --:/'1.'. ," '. ,I ,',10-,.... 'I' ~ ,..",' , &.:. ,; . , "
t': :it'-:t~~ ~~~i&!~1 ~~~>:I~;'::::'" ."
/ i' ;:.:~~;~~ :~:~;~~~ ;~'~,,~~,::;2' 9.25
- . . 'Pl'3!\><);i02!i1H,tfl'63i:'.~,; '<;;26"'42 9 25 .
. ..":::; . ~,~ ~ ,",''''', ...,.. .
~:"::~'~~:i:Jj~~~ $~~~~tk€~:'<F ~2,,'~:~':\.f":'
;.l,13.06-.;' "".200"., . 30.34
13.17
13.75
," ~:.~;~~~<l:'.:~~~~ ~f~~i::f:1;. ~~; h':?:_o"",,~ t,: '.'
. ~M3Hu!'i 1~;::~,OOi~~ :J\i30~ 92
'. .. "', ' '.:.U'~.~~ ~'ft~W;lt~ ~:-<..<:.:;~,.: ,....
,,':'.~,';,'; F r~,1.3r-20~ ~'OO~ :S3l';57 14.34'
: "
'''c, '_""~ _ ;;,,,:,, "
;,,:i:,: ~, '. ;e:13~'ao~ ~ ',..:3H75 ..14.6
~":~ )~ l~.p~~C'l~~ ' :-~.o;"~\:
...;, ,. i fi':J"'R~nt. ~"",<.},.
..' -..'..,,'"''',!> '~"'~~~- ,
.. .. ~lJ'~3'~~5'!: ~f~ 3S3f'5 ~; '3S" 1
:...... .~,... I':t.'i': :J.:;:. , , ' .
'l': " ,g'1~~~~ 12~~ ;.%135;!5'~
'~\;",. '''., , '~" X"J ~
'T;:';;, ~~~ ?~';3SSi5' '18.6.
'~.:;'~ <' '~.' ,.. ,,' ~o '..'....( '.: ' -,:~:' .,
. i!$~ ":~<':1",,,~,'l3 . ,
.~ ";' {;1'3::51;;.: ~"f1255~;f<1->::,:'<,;>"
I if ':~1"~3i;@5'it~~:~5<5:~r{ L:::...3' "s/
.',.., , :::l:i, "'>'i'!' "', ..20.84
'.~'./t:-
..'...,..,' ......,:;J~,' ',;,. ~"'~r6:O",'~<''''''.'' .... . .
: ,;;.,.,.~ "j' """'1~" . ''i''~;~2 - ,..).-;",~ o:,.".p.~'~"'."';11"'7 1
,. .., ~'.i t 1i), 4. ~ :$.:i' 5:~<'vk'38. 2 .
;""'. '., <>l."~~~~~" ,,,..,..,,.....:",.., ,..
- '.' ~f ' 1;1~~::ROi ~25511;1: ;~K'38't'42 21"25
;,., "'.,,~~, ..,,,,',q;;oi""'" ,ii':..;'....:.... . '
,,, ~:' ~-::14:!tl.~~235iJ:~ ,.,,::,.,,',y,'
;, , :~~!*~ t~2'~3'~"'5:'~'~ (;':1'3'6'::7' '5
"::;"; :;:,.eil....,l;1~ ,<<'..:~ ?hl ',.". 19.6
:,:::,::', , ~ ~1~~ Ir;~ :(:36:;~7 19 5
::r ~ ;:it: ~~1r!!~19:6
>':",;;. {?;'1~.. 2n'n1li!l "<;, I" ..(
~~;~~ -:~ ~I;;'.. fi ~.l~i ~~~:+~ ~: '~.,:;.
. .,f.'I '" ~im lmtil:'.w ",,",,<, , ','...
!,';'~ J" t, , " O~: '''<'l;:~3-3;'17 "16
:',:;~, ~ ,r ~. . "~ J).:> .. _
~~r- '~""',i:'5r:>,~,'"
::':'1. .' : W;J3';~~t, :::15.84'
\',;.,;~:- ~' lr
'';;'' ~ .
~'~l~ ~ S
!
17.84
'18~34
.~~Wftt~:t 't:;;f~-:~~,'-:.:::~;."f, ':;
..t.o".I.{..:,~).,..., ~'~"~,,,',,,"',"" .
~~ " o. ..... ,", ,." ,'._ .
r:l~;~~~l~it~;;:::>, .
DATE: 8 SEP'S3
ft.
BY:'
.
:>/II'lU
P. P .;1.
G. P .:'.1.'
. PU~lP IN~ . UI<Al-! I' SAND
~,lEVEL DOlIN' P.P,~t1~
rr;,IE
TRACE
.:: ,. .
"
. '.
.', c.
'.
; ..
." '. . ,.
, I". I
. .
.- .
.
.'. ,
.' '.
" ,
I
,
.'
:. "
,
TRACE
TRACE
TRACE
I
..
. .
;', "
":j: :
I
.
,
50
7 0 . . ' .
70 .
.,
'.
50 . .... .' ,
25 ,.'
25 " '.
.-
, " , '.
..
.
:
<,
" ','
. ,.
'. :
10
:1 0
,x. .. >'::i:;;
. .:.:..:,.'..."."",
., .'
, .:";:i':i
, . "
...,.
" ' ,
. , , . :,:~\~::L:\'~~.~U;~
.'
. "". . .~,'. .
.r',. '.
:!'-.',:'
" '..':"~'.>
..:>' :;::,.
r-O; '.:; .r<.' '.':,'.'}'
'o" .....,.."w..
,.:,: ...... ~~";..,:-';,:;....>;,~.
~. ,
.' .
" .:::..'
.'.. :,:~'jl~~::~,~.i{;j,:~j~:!;:~D~,~!i~~~l:Ill~~~i~i.gi~:~'::,i.}~), ;:.
SEP-23-1331
08:20 FROM
''"'" .
""I"
"'.':'\ l,:;')
~' ':~fiROO
~/~ :'~:-':!;~'b
:h'{.~ . !'.4'~:-:,.:.?~'
"'''14EIl
. ~ .~.j~~1- .. :.
~"~"~~~~ .
~t
10
7558923 -P:03/12
WELL '!JRiI.LINGFORFOUR'GENERATIONS , .
6300IndUitWAYI:'N: W.,'ADolf.; Minn:Ss3D3;(612)427;s1oo'"
'~.",*.,~, h ,"..' q _","to' h \:'~"I:>.\;;,'
,:t"~~':13~;;,:.~ ~.,<"A\~~"" . . ~" :' '. ','
'.1;,,\~7~/i-i.:J!.~';J'S..;.~.;.: .. :', ," ,
. .. r.. ~ ...... .' "'"
"~''''~lfI''''.'''~/.I.'~'_~' : If'!. 'l::"..\..l~b'.",;~...'N."
1t!'~"""Vt"'''' L" '-"1'''''7'' ''''''''~''.';;l1l,:., "
".1...c,twa e r; ve: ':,"", ;:,,; T:I; ""(
.'~:~;?;>:',>,.' I". ;<~,f : ";,
:0~~;;;-v' i'<.j;~':,,;,'. .1J" :.; ,,! ; ;~A:)() .
.-:,,~t'~'}.~:5{:r~:,':,:'1;~' ",,: i . 7" )t:..,)... ;" Ci1:?r;,. .
~ Jr":
:::>..",~ .
~:4:\~ :"1;:" ~
::>:i-~~\' it ~.
:..};~~~.~ I ~.. ~
I""')~.'b ~
Wai~,
~~
;;!.:
'~W:'.. '..
..
.~M~ ~~:~~l~; ~>DOOAA,."Wlr,
,..:~",,:~ ";:;~a,if[ ~':f' '-'''_ nl.
~'1 rq:~r?'/' ..'_ .:: t,,;
0::c,',;,3 ~..:'. ']';/7ee.l,
, ?n~i :','..2..I'a'~'J.
~6t,:~~ . .~.:"jI,:,,, ~ '.
~:, ?i3,!:f.\:;~ ~~
'fi,':Y:~,>4i':;t:7~~/
,:)/\iiU ;,
:;'P~P.;l.!
-0((.
,.
,;.o;~:s--
7 I
~ ~ ~
~ ~ .'
, t~
li~
~~~
11 ~~.:;~.:~'~}:: '.""-;'./;
~:t .:lq ~:,\;7!i~
:lZ'.J;:;..;..
.........
",:.;',')......"..<:;,.-:-.".r."'..."....~.,
,. .:-\:....- '1''';~~~4.';: ''''~'' "_'_.~-_'
~
'~. Ji;:'.:l;'-I.::<s.,.,. :')', ..
~
~~' .~*'/." ".""''''';V~,''i''.~ .;.,-~.tn~.
'. "",.." ."'~I "'''''I',..! I . .,....
, . 'kii1.',; <:In",:':> "'" f"1Ie'?...
. .' .
t:U'<;\"Y?}':!/"~,tJ ;t(".!J-t;:1..
~;i';.'~,J '.~ ,_"""~. ..",.
H.rO_';"l~. ..;\ ".~~~.'.,.
-!~~'-J.~~~~i~; .:.~Z~ ~~';W:
~...I:1) ~...1-'''''f:' . .:...~j,.:::,>, :.i,('.,
.....'....-.''''1...' - ".
.ft='1tx:~/.'\h',' ..
~.lJ'''~.''~ -'::.\'~"~\ ;
OJr\;.'.~::.:"..'
i
:~
.~
l
$~H'I'.~1>if, ;;.-'I;-/?',
,:;..,~f:)}J.O.,." ~;;l)(;/.'\','
..,..''1-..........1.. ..'
...........".'r.b..
~:i1j'.i,.:."'7\'.. ..., '."
ii.~.\)>:.::.'. .
r""r'I>""'~':'7'" ;.;;ry.,.
ta:1<'~"":,,, ~l::
"_,,-.1.:'1.( ,.','... '.
:/,::,
"
}.~j~~tD:,;~~ :.;,>,~;~ ;;,:''''
iff;j':;":' ('C"II ~'i6V"'" ." .',
.t"ei"...,:,. ,. /: ;'..
~:o 1,'....1--..\1:\.. .' '-. ,
. ~~I.q:)?',r1jt :;;;';Z:iA~'
.....:: (~: ,\~;t ~'1~ ~'z.b~:~t~I~,-
r; .1
~i
,- ~,
~: '
~.
\ "'~~i'-1b~~'~~~'.. ~~''''''';'';')tti.:~ ~
: ....'.'J~.'~,~~ .; ,:~;{t;
'", 0\' fi-/~'- ......
!~~1i'~~.<'" ;.f.\i'::::." ';:;'{
~,~;~;i%tj..,;;,., ~;,~<',::.:.,,,:,,;,
">C:It~\k~t4~'_ 1,UJ.1.,..,....~,:l
~'''''''''\ g ..., < "f' I ') "..,.",
I{~~" I ',..~~~lJf.;: ~~r V_;),..r:.:
I~~;' :..~.-:;~(J: ''''.'' :'.. srt~
~~~. itMii.\:~ fJ<;') /)'
~~;;.(.I'l;)""'~l,",~. ;'. C/;
~"f.>,;-",~~~"Xi"~';". ~~ff'\:" :'j:.,
W,~!;''')!:i,' ~.'A.',"" .. , (,.'
1>;.~..}'t.fi.tAA;.~\ ~fi~....";;",:,,~ .:_."":";:::
';rt~.::~ ~,1.~trZt.r,.~;:7.~:~
~
t~;1:~'
'):,\,1:-.',.
:(~;;j9
'..; ';.",; '1
' ~'. .
:'i~':,,/Jo!,l.~ .,,'.~:
..' . . - ..,.." ."", L~F:.t "j]";'''''''''''','t " '''it 1
~"'..,~.:}.',..,. . "'h'~'t .~,,' ,..,:".~>,:-,.
'. '.(.~:.. ;..:,..:.,:~',',....:....:Z,..:.',.'),..~.~,'..' ~ oJ,. ., '~.:,'.~,..'.,...,~',~,..:..'..'-.,. ,"'":,,-,:~,',',~",,,~'. :,' ''''-''',,'' (
':.'~' '.. ~. ~.,:('..-""., . _1.. ;j":,~~_:;'~::','~'~.';
'..~ ....')~~ ":., i i
~~~i~~.. :;.\.';....,.!,i.t..'.::.\':.'~~~\~.,~f ..' ..:.: .....:'.::~j.: ~::.!~.{;?.~~~i~i: ~./:;'~:.
..~.8,.t.. .,( ......' ~;.',~'f .,,:<\...,:~, ..'\~t:-~~'....~>.~,:.I~;':'''~1 :N'~,_,,,:, j
,4\ t.:.:..~:: ':. ~
,,",.~)grf~:, <*ir,:'.ff;~;:; .:~1'.";:';":X~~;'~=~'(L .: :f~"''':' '
I....,.. ."....' 'c~;t~:[ '."I"~~1 .....i \'." -"""'~-'" .. ~"',' .:::..e::(::...~,.~~.,:~.,'.,~:,.~.,....':.:;;<,.....'~'..
~. -' """;;"\';"''':J.[<~''';'').'~i ',',"'\'lX'~.':~"".(,.' ~ -'.........r.~;..." i:
\{;i;:;:.,{:~:ft!~f~\:j':'1 ";i.~: . t,~~t~"f:
1 \.;'~l,n '''..~''''''l'
, '."
,"
.' ..;-,,\--;\, .:\... ;,-.., .,.. '" : ~:...':.
:'.DATE:i?9.:....~-8;$'; '.'
\':;' \:':':-~" ,... . .......
.~,.'V\'." '.-......:~ . ...., . '..'. "'/.,'
",:,. BY",:.",.:'" ....:.:;:,~,.,.,.:..,
':'J..;', '.""'~~"""'.,,\,
-f.:.r"":'.'
";
'\' ...
: ;...>' ~'. .
;.,
'.,',.:
'. r:.
"
ti.;
, ,
,~ .
:'~: -:',i
',' '.::.;
... p I"~~ PU:-1~lN~ DAA~/. ,SAND
\.1. ....., :;.LEVEL" DOlIN .'. P. P~tf.
, , .,....;:::\i: ',.,;,~< ..:~. !;'</3';~'i :i'::,:!;:'].:X{':.
.. ",.., ',.;,;:' >. .... ./(~~' ![i;,\.,q:L~i F,>?j,t:>:~~ ';J:!:~:~~~F;c:
,...':;.... ".
.
.. ",
l"TIi'IE
::';
, .,
I. . ~ .
..11; ',Y .....' . ,';,\ '~,:~.;,;.;:""
~ ~~ ..'~ . 1,~ "r<..t ,Y;':i,:
~ ~ ,.':,~~;;~ ~'~'-,!-..~::,.:,..;.(g. '\:~;0;
j ~~, :~,7.. 1:,::/.,. ..... ,';t:."rt;
,~:':; 7. .-:i~,~::, ~>.:',~,::;> , . -' '; 1::;;'/":..,,\\::,, .';;.
:W"'...:::;<~l~~~'
.....:...'.ci
.'.,....
.~;:i:-~~:?~'-i~~~~~J'.~
::~:~~~J~K~~'~'~~
.;/~:{.
, ~ ,:.,~ ~~
fit's.
dO, " ,:'.
"
;(; ?:-K~:::~{'.~,~.f;~
I.:.:" .
~'.~:; '~~:.~:l,'.> ~k~.~,~'~~N.",.
~,.;--,~-,,;:~,~~.,; !~oI.,,~~~.~.~.
.. '.' " ,i~;,;:'r~:':. .~:'~ ''':::."
.' '..'~.~.'.:' ,.";"",,,'.I\,'~' l.,:",'-:'-';'f,;.c-:; >~""""''I'':''''~7:l'.'
~.<:,I,.: - :',:'; .,~:' :;'_~.t~.~.,.,)~/;~.:,~.;} ~r~.~~:.~':~~~~.t; ~~~~~!2~i'2'
.; .
k~~ b..s:: ;;,~ :>:.:.';n<;
:\' :' '.:\': 1-/\. " ~:,:';,: ';,
;-:,,',.. """ ") ~. '.. '.
".. ,,: .,.. ..., <::~
~;S:;~i r~~~~ i~:i~~~':.
i.;. :~', ':~':: ;;)2~.~"~~'
,~~,,;;'j'!.l'\",~";l"
....J,..'J.:~..~.:\\"..,." I
:.(~Jt:.,':f.'~'. .~
,.:,';.'
I..,
:~~i;~:~:~~~.':,~1
':''':I~.~ :;,.,t..~..~.~ l~;'~':'" :"0:,.';; >." ~."... :,"~ -, . .i:"~'~':~~"""f"~. ;........~";J a~,'.(,~s
4'_' "'H .\" ). ';.-. "'~, ',t.,..:.,:.'?'-.i.,.::.,...,.~.....:;~.,~.'.:,..:r'".~,.~.; "'?m"'.' ...,',.,~....""I -$"
,~,:.,......,v.,:.'...'........:'~,:.,,',....:..,...,.....'_~,: .,' ,'.."...., 1"'\ . . ~-:. ,~. : ~..... I ~'$,::.1'" ."~ . ~~. "',
;..~ '-.'~ . . :~, ;r-:t>. ~~~..f: .'4~'\f,:;...i'f~... i.','"
~ :.
;!:(~
. Dt.":,,,\~
..., . ..:" c.':
,. ".-,;",'
'):';:/) '.
(7:;"V:,
., ~
....~._.
:,:1" .
.' ~.,',,;~
~q';'.: '..:', ;.~:.', .,~~~P'~\:,;:"'~' ,
'-t.;'. ,;' :,'~~{ '.':'...
';;::: :"."-If' ,.::'.:',
I"':'i.:' :.;, :.~:,
I::'M>."'....:" ".
'~'~.,~:\'...';.: ." .......
".:-'I'e'....' ,"",::/"".
....\ I' '....,."" , '_ . I. ,-
','. j~ .J.:..:.& ':.,
..10. '''.-.~t
'. . ./;Pl)'~' . .;:., '(f8""'" ,~.
..,' ...': "'. """. ,o,~/!-';.
"~<\". .' -'.:,:. "r- :. '..{I/. 'j,,:':;':".i,~
;,'.'ij,;;',:," !'.:,::' . '. :'.
,::~".::,:,~".' "',, ~. .,'.'..;,:.,
..I....
<F :.....,..
. ::; .,~'..:'.:;~'<
.-.. ';'~'.' . :'
"
!,.
I'~:,
.
, L'
.. I',:
. I..'.... ;.:
''''M:' ::'1"....
:~'>> ~ ~'r' ,;'t.,;'.'
/1 :~~, ,;,~:~.':-{'~:..:'::':.
'. ..... ., t... ;::,..,lo-,::.,'5,~.,..!.:;~,":,\',',"""~",,. ., ;-""
_~ r _' :.',.,.::...;:.,.....:.,.;~,.;~,;,._:.J:,'.:.;...:,':;,~.:.,...
:;r"Yj- :;.' ~,.''''''''';'.:.:~~. , f'. .~. :WC:'
~:~4..t';;:~;.:',~~;:.:~~
:,~:.~~':{t:~~.~~:.::.~.c';~
'.'-J~!' ~"f'j..''i~4t,
'Y,..i~"'~~',,/,
~~~~- ',~ ~,Gi~jl!~~.:
~'J\.l'l S~~,\:
'''i~;rf-'
:!~'~~~ ~.;,:~.:~
~}:~:.:/}:~ .
~'j ,. ".
~i?::': }"~:~'i~~i';
f!~;{~'{1~i.F':~f:
"',..
~~ ,~:: l
\ ~-::', .
;;~<
. 1..~~....".\..1J,
. ',.. V.,""J.:."
',.. ;\V;" '11. .'.'
,. L:i':~ '..i
r:,:,C~:.'. ).' :
~", :.....,. .',.... .....
~,CS \~~(,~~~~
~;:.:\ ':.~.:: ":~::':
"~;"
>;,. '<'..:.I..~.~"I:r:. :i\",'''''1,,'''!;~
"" "''- I N~\,,".:j,.,,:,.'.'<t,
'...:....,:...., '.i.' '~.':'.:.:.~ ", '.:,,~,..- , :lj' .. "i ". .
-, . :." ~ .~..'K.:'~~:Kt:l.-t'~:",
!..,;...
~~~y
lli'\.~,;..,.. .. II.. :::~"C.;,;:
~ '. . ,~"~' r ".' .
I ,. .. '\i;.1~' .:~."
~.:~;:.~~!~~~~l:~;(r
:~~\~'~r.:~~~;\~.r..
~~?;i;~~:~'2;~;+
fI1~~
~:1/~~,::'~: ~;t~?;:}{
"'"
.'x','. :
:?~~:..;.I
'. X~f~~~:.,{;i,;_~~~ .,
~~;~~ l
J'"
:.'{;~:;.~:..~
:.
".~l'.
"
"
.
',f,
~.
.-,.,.
,..,-,
(, -t~ ;'.: ':.i
"':;".':1
{ :"~~
"":~':':;l
~&,!i\"j1,
~i{~
;-~- ""':~
,. ..
"
, ,
; ::~;l~.;:ii
~.:'::'1~; ~: J
'.. ...:;',~":' '1
'" i~,: .
i:;:~.,v." .
....:.\,~::
'" ,J
.\'-:"('~":'~'ljj
"'~~~\1
. ....1
~j:'
.,
':,:'''',''
'. ,
..."'"
: ,~'I!
';1
..!
I
j
,
.~
j
1
I
I :".. ,.~
;.:.~~~;(;I'
:~ "~" ..,J
'.
~ .~:h' :',:'j
,.... ., '.' ~
,', ~:~~......
: I.::,.;'::
..".,"
,~>~~";"'.' ::.
SEP-23-1991 08:23 FROM
TO
7558923
P.10/12
c,.,l . ....~ f
MODEL: 6..240
RPM: 3500
'\
60 CYCLE
. 80
;'.'
.
t .1 I I I , III I I tH-
o 0 0 0 , I 1- .,...."..
, : "." 0 II I
, , 0
'. ; 1
~l ":'1 I 0 , ;
'. " <'1 0, i T . r
, , r J I ~, I I 0
, , . , , 1.1. ,
....~ . I.j : ,
.. . ,., I
. 't. , r ,
.'
,- I' . '; r..., ....~ ., , . , r ; .
;. " . , ! , 0 , ,
',";' " " . , i !~
" 1 ; , :TI.
~. - , , I 0 , , ,
, ".' , ,
'Iii " .. '. ; .' /"1-. I ! ; , I , .
.' ~, ....; \-. . .. ~' 'I '. , -',I I . , "
0 , . .. .", ,. i'Io., . . .
"-k ., . .,.., 1 : d.
". .... - , 1 i I , ,
..
... ., I 1 j I
, I .... ; . r ,
..i I , , : 1 I."
.J~ . ; I I il.
., '. ~I . I :
. ;'1 ,
\
.. 1
I
I I I '.1
.. , I I : ; : .
.. 0 , I I~I J
0,' 0 , I , ,
0 I
.. j I
.. I , I
\ r I
... , I
. , .. f
1 I , I I I , ;
.." , , 1 : ; , I :.
o. I :
'.
:t,
t 0
0.'
.
Z
I..
" '.~"': . ~
~~J;1l
..LU"-60
.).a.\i>:.: :'
I .. , .
. ~,' , .
. ~:' ~. . ~
.';j50.
..... ......
. .....,'.< ,'.,. ~/...
'uf;;>::;;.
.' :l::'.':40
t) . ";
-.
. :E..."i30'
~r.
Z.'~I~':..,.,
)00,.:(.,:,
0:";:20
.' '.,','.
I' ..,J :.;<':,.t
_....,,-
.~,:;;::.:.:.-C
'. r-........\.,,-;.,',~
0.....,'..-
..-10.; ,
. ',: ~~?:l~~;>':::'
)~i:~
20
'\
',-.J
15
10
4
3
"';'.2
+.,
+1.5
. :" :-~\'~p>:~~f,~':';\';:~~;~:..~::.;.~.)~~:~,:~:'t,:"~:';'. <, ;",,' . . ",".
'. .:A-.;:One\t.5tag9' Pump: Length; (in.) I a
': B>~~datt'jC;~ar,St~ge . length (in.) 5Vs
:-.C~~M~x),.:Bow"Di~meter (in.) 5V~ '
';'. ';D~~C',ijble~:G~ard Height. (in.) H*
,E~~in~;;jStbmer9~;,ee'(i".) 13 (If NPSHA equ~ls NPSHR)
...' ..;F~DiicH~tge~",Tap '(in. N.P.T.) 4' .
, ',\,'Jrnfi~ref,\.t;Yi1e:~:EnCI08ed ..
..' .~..'.;.; t~i..~;'ft,(l,~_,.. "'.'~'" -:... .
'. '.....'. "'. "'.':;toto, " """~.' .."...l.." .."'...." "0" '.. (') .
.:.:.~.::~~j.'.;~~1 rrm~,~,;'t~~2>~>~:/ Jt!. _In._
;' 'M.'ly:0;'o:.t~~'$' ">';~;';,i4.43 8 .'
.'.; '0' B....\ ,.,4.250.
''''''.'7:'':') i'~'4 000"
. :, ~. .') . ':., "'. .
..'-::-"',.. :-fi '~P~./4". ,-eaded .
" ~t1.~~~<'t~:r!~~~l~~;oStageS:15:> .
--:'::';:"~~"""~#"""";;'oles"'.~eflect V;treot!s ,::,,~.....,;,: :-,',"'<;
" "',";. ~.~:'.~,.;:~~ ~.~"t"l~"';;",;;: ..~.\"~'. . .,;';,; :. I
. -;" 'J-"" ;~~r.:-~:.i..,..:..:~._.""..".....,.
N~lt i"'li~ii,J"~."
2
:100
200 300 400
CAPACITY - G.P.M~
0;,
...~
:"\~":\ .
500
1
B
j
o
F
o
o
K FACTOR=3.14
-5
, .
1;:~"~,ig:~~1~t~:~:~." .~f 2 ;_~,':!~~'.~~,~-. .
Peak H.P.
.3.55
2.9 .~
. 2.35'
J
RGO JACKeTe
PUMPS
A 01vision of Wy1ain, Inc..
. ~',:;':""::~t. .
,.,'I'",;~;'
. .'//';"', .,
.-.
.....
PO.' Bllilll '''1'1' ':'"I,L "^"1,I It.^,,, ~
r'l':'
....;"...,-: . .,'!~~...: :'.,.:. '.C'. -..' ...
~~~-~~-l~~l ~~:d4 ~HUM
TO
135 GPM
~
w
u.
-
:r
o g:
Z
70. >-
()
Z
w
(3
u:
u.
w
200
:",".
':,'
:\,':'(;.~.'.:;~" ~
APPROX. UNIT
SHIPPING WF. LBS.) ,
84 . ,I.' "
aa, .
146,
167
166.., ,.
225.",. .
243 .
26S, '.". '..
'....
7558923
P.11/12
if'
.. . ,Vi
'::':'f~
........:,t~I.~.
,':t~<
.....~...
,w,
"t:;
....
'~~i
;/~
. (Ar
. .'j
.:....
..J!;
'.;:~
<i
'It
, ~.!>
;:~
,..~.
'.
~~
. ',~ '... .
...'.
~~':,,;~.;;:~:.~~.:~';;:~... .
.i;:~f:{(i. ;:...~ "
n~.' .
,'&\!
. . ~
:~j}t l:l :./; ':';i:~~...;:" . '.
~~: ~JJ'\~.r;:") !'f,' .'
~~t:r,':'.;,.;;" '.,
:~';::~. ,.,"
~..'_..... .A...~,y
~~": : .
.I"
."! " ~.
'.(. .
,.),.,.,',....1-.....""",.,,
., ..i ';,:......j..;!:~ii\lt"
.......
. ':: ~ ':,
.., ....
,
" . ~ .
"
,('
.'
"'1..
"
i.
,.
..
~' \,:. . . (
. "..
'..' .
".';: :':
j.,.
," :,'" .' :":'" ;', ..'.l:...., '0 't.~....:';~:... \
.: ,..~,", ....,. :' .....:... ,'.;?:::,:;,:L:i~".:\i':,::,:~!;':U~,~1Wf~:;,::,,(tV:}
',' ... ',.' .", '-', ' .-,'.'~. -. ~.: -:....'('>:~;./:;.1!~I~~~I.l.(~i-~~......~!ji;~.'k~'tt;,:-~(~.t~).t
. "_:_'!"~;'~'.'~:.'-~~';'.:?:r.~::\'~;,>.~:~~:.t:.~::?J.'J.:~);.~~~Ai.~ . ..,' ,'.;I,'..... .."'.
o.cr-",.o-l:;:;Il Ud:2b t-KUI'I
<
- .',2255'
;/: l./.(J
;,..l;',,'l. ,A
":" .......,.,
~ i~?/':::{~~~!~~~~;t~,t,;:;",\';'" '.... "
ff_~;,".:t,,~.;;.j{'(!"/FlOW RANGE '
:~. ~':-:~~~~';'''~-50'i, 290 GPM
. ;1'\_ .di't~~.}'t ~(, ft~.J J .
F ~ :..;."'f,).:<~.~i$:;r?':) <;":PVMPOUTLET
> J,., ',.,......:"..~,....r,,,..~...~". .
~. '. '.,.~:'..,..,,:,.i: ....'.:.'3".'NPT
' . ., ',_. ..,. . '."- '.~ ''''.,. .
. t .'
;.',"
,/:;,;;.;~:,;'i
,"' ...... ..., .."..".:~
. ;~~:@:";:iiA!
. \'H:~.~fj:~n~
."'.....'8
;~'~::.;:?;:'f:::~!
'."
,.
"
."
-",.
:::'e"
~. ~,
.~ ..
~:\. .~;: .. _. .
~\...... ".-'
" '.
,-,
TO
7558923
P.12/12
:2,:25 GPM:'
. PERFORMANCE CURVES
1000
900
800
700
600
i="
w
UJ
I.L
-500
o
~
w
::I:
400
"",',
,
,-.
',;,
{:';
o
DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHTS
. . :,' , .-;._., ,"":~'~.1:1~.~,\.M.;.,:'..,;,:,~\,.\'iJ;~.:
.'....'., ""'....,,". ....w~~,' ....J.."......""~>.,.;;...yJ.~.
n' 0( "I\:~. .t'r'fp::f'~. ~"&I':'~"::~lJl.":I'tl1.~...~t::;l.,tl
.
,
."
MIN, WELL LENGTH ,i' MAX. WIDTH. t'J APPROX:UNIT;~;';!
MODEL NO. HP SIZE (INCHES) (INCHES) . '(INCHES) .~ . SHIPPINGWT!(LBSh~
225S50-2 5<D 6 43%.. ! '5% . t,~'.... '. ..: 'r.q~~:c!Ji86~~t'~~Ii~:'i'r
225$75-3 7'h 6 48'12 , . '50/. 'fl";:'" "'.i,,i*;:';;'133.~~4
, '..., .. .. . , .. ..., ~
225S1004 10 6 54%' '. · "50/.: I~,;:,i ~; ~,>1if;f145~~~
225$150-6 15 6 64~". ! .50/..' r(':i ,:.:....I"ri"!'1l174~~~~~
" '" -.. ...:>..... ." " " _'_"N .\,
225S200.8 20 6 75V. .. , . 5 0/.-,,. ,'f f,:',ii~~195.~I!~~:t ;
,
225$250.10 25 6 65% ". .... .'" 5 0/4 .,It>,W; Ii<,',,;:~ :+i.~~221~~:;J.<;~~'~,,;
~~,. ?....~~-t~260f1-\-l<:i:.~,.~~,~.~ ;
2258300-12 30 6 96% .' 5~A.''''>>,
2258400.15 4~ 6 117% : 5 0/4 ,., ~,,~ ~."'\r.~.'?-)I~~~~:~"'..~":":I~~'l!t l
... '.
NOTES: <D 4-lnch molor. . " ':' '. " .:"".7.....,~l'.~' ",~/!,'~~f'lI\1._~..!~~"'1
"" 6-lneh motor slandard' B-Inch m. Olor optional.' ,:,:...~t~~.:;;~":,~Ji'.:;:":i~:''''''''''''';'';>'''''~:\'~3<:5. i,
W f ..;........J..".,\........... :f,''fo':\''';'~',' ~~i-t~,..... ,'e
Specl1lcallons t\ItI wbjeollo change I'iilhout nolicG..;,'..',;i;.~.';';~'i\:;~. '~;,;.;,r.. ~.,~'i'."j'?l.ft...,
. . ',." ;.;:~~;:~!h~;~~~~,,':~~~. ".. .' ,...,ff..~~:~:~!ii.~:r~:\'..:'
TliTQI 0,")
~-)
'CA"'''''''M''''",''''''''',"
e;:' "1',
,',' ."
;(~f "\
\ .1
'~\.,/ir
't'-~~ '.~
l'~~~'If,#
DATE
October 15, 1991
"
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
staff, Committee, Comm
ITEM Capital Equipment
NOj1. Purchases/Public Works
APPROVrP I ~R
AGENDr X II
BY, )0 ~
I am asking the ~uncil
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Public Works
BY:
€J
Frank stone
Below is the 1992 Capital Budget needs.
for approval or denial.
One new truck, plow, wing & sander
Hot box for patching streets -
mounted on old plow truck
One new bobcat
Parks tandem trailer
Tractor with rear & side mower and
front-mounted sweeping broom
One Toro
One 4-wheel drive pickup with plow
TOTAL
$64,000.00
$50,000.00
$16,000.00
$3,500.00
$30,000.00
$12,000.00
$14,000.00
$189,500.00
5 of the above items are replacement units and the 2 other would
only increase our productivity.
Below are the departments and percentage splits for each
department.
streets
One new
Hot Box
Tractor
4 wheel
Bobcat
& HitwaH
truc , p ow, wing & sander
for patching streets
with mower broom
drive pickup & plow
50%
100%
50%
25%
25%
Snow & Ice
One new truck, plow, wing & sander
4 wheel drive pickup & plow
Bobcat
50%
25%
25%
MOTION BY
"-
',J TO
COUNCil ACTION
SECOND BY
$32,000.00
$50,000.00
$15,000.00
$3,500.00
$4,000.00
$104,500.00
$32,000.00
$3,500.00
$4,000.00
$39,500.00
'\
'J
Parks
Tandem trailer
Tractor with mowers
Toro
4 wheel drive pickup & plow
Bobcat
100%
50%
100%
25%
25%
Distribution
4 wheel drive pickup & plow
25%
Storm Sewer
Bobcat
25%
TOTAL
$3,500.00
$15,000.00
$12,000.00
$3,500.00
$4,000.00
$38,000.00
$3,500.00
$3,500.00
$4,000.00
$4,000.00
$189,500.00
All replacement units are over 10 years old and running high
maintenance costs.
)
'"''CA''' '''''''''''''',.,\,
, ,~
,.~
;,~i,..... "~:
.. "~
,,;,., ,"
,'I" i,'
J \,,,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i'"
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE October 15. 1991
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
ITEM
NO,
Release of Bond
Funds
BY:
Bob Peach ~
J:lnnn'" --It n.>I' ~
BY:
/6.
-
WIth FIre StatIon #1 beIng substantIally completed, I am
requestIng the CouncIl to authorIze the removal of the asterIsk*
from the varIous Items in the bUdget to allow them to be
purchased. The remaInIng Items yet to be purchased consIst
mostly of furnIture and other Items for the buIldIngs. The
reason for reservIng the purchase of those Items was In
antIcIpatIon of unexpected costs In closIng the buIldIngs.
Though there wIll be some mInor change orders left In StatIon #2,
the costs of the buildIngs have been wIthin expectatIons.
With the removal of the asterisk* and the purchase of those
items, there wIll stIli be a substantIal reserve to cover any
contIngencIes on StatIon #2 and Tanker 8. To date, all purchases
have been made comfortably wIthIn the budget as expected.
The last two weeks have been spent almost exclusvely schedulIng,
pIckIng up, and workIng on the new trucks. There Is stIlI
considerable work in inventorying, serIalIzIng, computerIzIng
purchases, installing equIpment In the trucks and the StatIons,
and researchIng and purchasIng the Items for the buildIngs.
COUNCil ACTION
MOTION BY
SECOND BY
, "
"--/ TO
SEPTEMBER 29 1991 N ORDERED REV
FIRE DEPT. BOND BUDGET ~ ~~~~~~~~___!~!~~___~~~~~_~~~~~~~___!~~~f
BUILDING COSTS
BONESTROO CONTRACT 100100 56972 100100
TESTING6SOILS CONCRETE 2176 2176 2176
BONESTR 0 INSPECTIONS 24000 4601 24000
,J MAERTENS BRENNY 1037391 635738 1037391
LAND STATION#2 45500 46965 46965
LAND STATION#3 25000 COUNCIL 25000
SURVEY 2135 2135 2135
SAC/WAC ADMIN 26200 26200
OTHER,PERMIT,APPRAISAL,ADV 1404 1404 1404
CHANGE ORDER
LINTEL 415 415 415
PHONE CONDUIT 569 569 569
HYDRANT 6850 6850 6850
BURNISHED BLOCK 21622 21622 21622
COMPACTION/STA#2 332 332 332
RAKE JOINTS 1992 1992 1992
LOW E GLASS 649 649 649
PVC IN LIEU OF CAST PIPE -800 -800 -800
QUARRY TILE ON SIDEWALK 4246 4246 4246
QUARTZITE FLOORING 19033 19033 19033
CLOSET SHELVING 222 222 222
ELECTRICAL OUTLETS 199 199 199
WOOD PANEL WAINSCOT 4393 4393 4393
MAGLOCK DOORS 2915 2915 2915
CONCRETE SLAB 436 436 436
CARPET BORDER 0 1399 1399
ADD OUTLETS T.V. 0 106 106
FLOOR OUTLET 0 184 184
ADD TRUCK FILLS 0 1173 1173
RED LIGHTS 0 1173 1173
ADD WASH FAUCETS 0 1585 1585
TELEPHONE DOOR OUTLET 0 689 689
COMPRESSOR ELECTRIC STA 2 0 312 312
SUB TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS 63073 69694
TOTAL BUILDING COSTS 1326979 1334064
BOND COSTS
ALDRICH STUDY 4850 4850 4850
BONNESTROO REPORT 1755 1755 1755
PRE-ELECTION COSTS 2800 2801 2801
BOND COORDINATOR 14710 4518 14710
BOND DISCOUNT 25000 25000 25000
BOND INTEREST TO CITY 14602 9576 10000
BOND SALE 15000 15000 15000
LEGAL COSTS
BOUNDARY SURVEY STATION 1 1000 1000 1000
LAND ACQUISITION STATION 2 4621 4115 4115
BOND CONSULTING 12000 11085 12000
OTHER 1200 0 1200
TOTAL BOND & LEGAL 97538 92431
FURNITURE
5 WALL BEDS 1 10000 COUNCIL 10000
8 BED LINNEN 1 800* 800
5 RECLINER 1 2000* 2000
1 SOFA 1 600* 600
3 END TABLES 1 300* 300
4 BAR STOOLS 1 360* 360
6 TRASH 30GAL 120 120
24 TRASH 10GAL 720 720
47 WINDOW BLINDS 3000 2478 2633
1 MOVIE SCREEN 450 450
75 STACK CHAIRS 12150 4208 4208
25 TRAPEZOID TABLES 2500 1246 1246
1 VIDEO CABINET 1 300* 300
4 MARKER BOARD 2X3 120 120
1 CORK BOARD 4X8 130 130
1 CORK BOARD 4X6 85 85
4 CORK BOARD 2X3 120 120
3 HANGAR WALL RACK 90 90
100 HANGAR 5METAL 135 135
10 RUGS 3X 200 200
.,~) 2 KEY CONTROL CABINET 1 95* 95
1 CHIEF DESK 600 600
4 ADMIN DESK 1600 1600
5 DESK CHAIR 850 850
5 FILING CABINET 875 875
10 STORAGE CABINET 24X36X72 1 1900* 1900
6 DOUBLE TIER LOCKER 1 250* 250
1 PODIUM 0 150
TOTAL FURNITURE 40350 40350
-
'APPLIANCES
1 T . V. 32" 2300 COUNCIL 1499 1499
2 T.V. 26" 760 1012 1012
3 V.C.R 700 759 759
1 RCA 415 CAMCORDER 900 840 840
2 VACUUM COMMERCIAL 1000 1000
2 WASHING MACHINE COMMERCIAL 1200 764 764
,) 2 DRIER COMMERCIAL 1200 574 574
2 R.O. WATER PURIFIER 1 1500* 1500
1 COFFEE MAKER BUNN LG 300 300
1 COFFEE MAKER BUNN SMALL 100 100
1 COPIER 1 1200* 1200
2 REFER/FREEZER 2100 1122 1122
2 RANGE/OVEN 1400 1341 1341
1 MICROWAVE 300 318 318
1 DI SHWASHER 0 281 281
SHIPPING 0 50 50
MISC. TABLE & KITCHEN 1500 1500
TOTAL APPLIANCES 16460 14160
STATION EQUIP
1 COMPUTER SYSTEM 4000 COUNCIL 4000
2 COMPRESSOR 5000PSI 20000 BID 19167 19667
2 CASCADE SYS 6676 3213 3213
2 IRRIGATION LAWN SYS. 8700 8700 8700
3 HEALTH EXERCISE EQUIP 1 7500* 7500
55 TURNOUT RACKS 7000 5337 5437
25 STORAGE SHELVING 1 2500* 2500
2 COMPRESSOR 90PSI 1000 839 1500
2 RADIO BASE STATION 6904 6650 6904
RADIO LICENSING 861 861
2 INSTALL RADIO EQUIP 5000 10000
2 TELEPHONE SYSTEM 10000 COUNCIL 7711 7711
1 FACSIMILE MACHINE 1 1400* 1400
2 STATION MAINTENANCE 2000 2000
2 FLAG POLE 0 1250
2 WINCH HOSE TOWER 2000 2000
TOTAL' STATION EQUIP 84680 84643
TRUCKS
1 E2 PUMPER #E6580 201575 206712 206712
1 L5 AERIAL #E6581 324994 328641 328641
1 T8 TANKER #1489 94023 48650 93198
1 T9 TANKER #1488 91187 90264 90264
2 G2 G3 GRASS #SK521 #SK522 67382 64480 64882
BID ADMIN COSTS 916 461 461
2 GENERATOR SETS 9600 9600 9600
1 LETI'ERING 966 966
TOTAL TRUCKS 789677 794724
EQUIPMENT
2 RADIO E2 L5 5350 5458 5458
3 RADIO G2kG3fT8 5535 5175 5175
2 PORTABLE AD 0 1828 1828 1828
3 CLASS A FOAM PUMP 1 10000* 10000
15 PAGERS 8160 7785 7785
20 DRAEGER AIR PACKS 4.5K 43300 43314 43314
15 TURNOUT GEAR 0 8171 8171
2 ELECTRIC VENT 20" 1900 1368 1370
2 DRYWALL HOOK 6" D HANDLE MTG. 95 175 175
2 PIKE POLE 61 FBRGLS MTG. 158 125 125
2 PIKE POLE 8/FBRGLS MTG. 186 150 150
3 ATTIC LADDER 81 450 350 350
4 2 SPANNER WRENCH MTG. 200 156 156
6 2 SPANNER & HYDRANT MTG. 480 294 294
4 4 STORZ WRENCH MTG. 280 250 250
4 15# C02 EXTINGUISHER MTG. 500 500 500
4 20# ABC EXTINGUISHER MTG. 280 276 276
2 2.5G PRESS WATER EXT MTG. 300 116 116
2 LAMP,120V 501 CORD 10/SwG RUBR 180 125 125
2 1001 EXT CORD 10GA 4GANG RUBR 200 338 338
4 500W PORT FLOOD w/PIGTAIL 300 636 636
1 HEAT SCANNER 250 819 819
1 K-TOOL LOCK BREAKER 150 79 79
4 36" BOLT CUTTER 928 540 540
2 RAM/PRY BAR 100 420 420
4 PICK AXE wCOVER MTG. 300 250 250
-) 4 FLAT HEAD MTG. 300 216 216
6 PULASKI AXE 900 234 234
12 MOWER RAKE 450 450 450
2 36"PRY BAR 120 58 120
2 HALLIGAN TOOL 260 200 200
2 GAS LINE CLAMP 150 300 300
4 POMPIER BELT 2LG 2MED 300 500 500
1 ECHO QUICK-VENT wCHAIN&SCABORD 850 966 966
1 CHAIN SAW 600 587 587
12 PAT. PRRSONAT. AT.F.R1' nRvrr.R n 114n
,,
1 DEFIBRILLATOR 1 0 5000
1 AIR QUALITY TESTOR 1 0 2000
SUB TOTAL 85340 100413
HOSE/ADAPTOR
44 50' 1.5"D.J.HOSE 1 4300 2750 2750
40 50' 2.5"D.J.HOSE 1 5400 3980 3980
2 4.5"F/5"STORZ wDRAIN 180 420 210
" 8 4"S/5"S 1600 752 752
'-) 4 1.5"TRI LOCK NOZZLE HOLDER 80 77 77
2 2.5" TRI-LOCK NOZZLE HOLDER 40 35 34
2 10'MAXIFLEX LONG HANDL 6" F 800 750 750
1 MANIFOLD 4.5"F X5"S-2 2.5"M 500 1390 690
1 #MTFT-R tASKFORCE AUTONOZZLE 593 575 575
2 5"SX2.5"M w'CAP 300 191 191
2 5"SX6"F 280 318 318
16 #1720P 1.5" NOZZLE 5280 4020 4020
4 #2730 2.5" NOZZLE 2250 2312 2312
10 2.5"F X 2.5"F 300 250 250
10 1.5"F Xl.5"F 180 188 187
10 2.5"M X2.5"M 175 175 175
10 1.5"M Xl.5"M 160 144 144
10 2.5"F X1.5"M 200 168 168
8 2.5" 30% ELBOW 520 680 680
2 4.5"F X 5"SwBLINDCAP 200 84 150
2 SIAMESE B95-A 300 300
2 2.5" GATE VALVE,M-F 240 378 378
2 2.5"Xl.5" GATED WYE 400 328 328
2 6" DROPTANK STRAINER 800 598 598
SUB TOTAL HOSES 25078 20563 20017
TOTAL TRUCK EQUIP 110418 120430
GRAND TOTAL 2466102 1820901 2472390
-------- --------
BALANCE UNALLOCATED 33898 679099 27610
NOTES 1 ITEMS NOT TO BE PURCHASED
* UNTIL BLDG IS FINALIZED
TOTAL 58136 54435
"
J
~,
".J
'"~C""''''~-'~''''''\,'
"t- "tt,
il~ ,
~ ~
";\l
',1,'
'1~ _'
" dI'
"""-..".... ~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
NO,
October 15, 1991
staff, Committee, Comm Admin.
ITEM
NO,
(;.
storm Drain Outlet
to Ditch 37
BY:
James E. Schrantz
The City Council has asked the Staff to come back to the Council
with some sort of conclusion on the storm drainage pond outlet on
project 91-10, 159th Lane, Swallow street, and Quinn street
project.
The plan provides for a overflow of the pond in the project to
drain to a wetland just south of the project area. The volume of
the water that will overflow is quite minor and the wetland
fairly large. Little problem was expected to acquire the needed
easements. The property is owned by the Warren's.
Mr. and Mrs. Warren have a concern about the wetland because when
the the water in the wetland gets high the water table can cause
water to get into their basement and the water also ponds along
Nightingale Street in the ditch. You can see the black area
along the road where water has sat. This year the annual
rainfall has been way above average, more than 6" above average.
The Warren's ask that the wetland be provided a outlet as a
condition to granting an easement from the project pond to the
wetland and also that the street ditch be cleaned from their
property to the County Ditch. (Ditch 37).
This additional work, if the Council agrees it should be done,
will require an additional permit by the Coon Creek watershed
District.
Also the property owner along Nightingale Street NW south of the
Warren property is owned by Jerry Windschitl who also wants
County Ditch 37 cleaned.
We have discussed a number of options to satisfy the property
owners that are directly or indirectly involved.
COUNCil ACTION
"
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'_/
The option that involves the least number of people is to provide
, , an outlet to the wetland and clean the street ditch down to Ditch
\,J 37 with a permit from the CCWD.
Another option is to participate with Jerry Windschitl in
cleaning Ditch 37 and his private ditch up to the Warren property
under an agreement with Jerry and under a permit from the CCWD.
A third option is to construct a storm pipe along the backs of
the lots in the project and outleting into the wetland that is
north of the Warren property, and provide a controlled outlet to
the Nightingale street ditch.
Glenn Cook and I have meet with the Warren's and discussed their
concerns. I have also meet with Jerry windschitl.
Glenn Cook and I have meet with Tim Kelly the Administrator for
the CCWD. Tim Kelly, Glenn Cook and I plan to meet with Jerry
Windschitl.
The Watershed Board will consider this at there meeting on the
28th of October. We are unable to make the meeting on the 14th.
It may be impossible to solve all the problems that exist in this
area. These problems existed before we started the street
project.
The only additional run off, after the frost is out, will be the
water run off on the paved streets over what would have soaked
into the sand streets. Only part of the project drains to the
pond in question. The area is very flat and under the project we
have left the storm water continue to go where it has gone in the
past.
The feasibility report proposed a storm sewer plan for the area
at a cost of around $180,000. It was not included as part of
this project.
We will continue to work on the solution.
Attached is a memo from Tim Kelly.
'-
_J
,,)
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Jim Scharntz,
Andover Ci~nager
T~m K~l r<J:;~
Dlstrlct Admlnlstrator
TO:
DIHE:
October 7, 1991
SUBJECT:
Notes from 10/4/91 Meeting
As a follow up to our meeting on the repair of ditch 37, and an
outlet to the wetland in the south east quarter of the
south west quarter of section 15 we discussed the
following:
:. Any work will require a permit from the District.
2. The District will need details on the ditch cross section and
grade for the road side ditch.
3. A control structure may be needed at the outlet of the
wetland, depending on the elevation of the connection
between the road side ditch and the wetland. We will
need to see the details on the outlet structure.
4, The District has no money available to clean the portion of
ditch 37 we discussed, and nothing is scheduled for
1992. Other options would be either the city, or the
adjacent property owners. A district permit would be
required.
5. Realigning/straightening ditch 37 so it conforms with the
property lines just west of Nightengale will require a
permit from the District. Reconstruction must be done
to District specifications and must be completed
before the old ditch alignment is filled in.
6. This project could be phased so that an immediate remedy could
be arrived at in phase 1. Approval of phase 1 would
be contingent on commitment to developing a
comprehensive drainage plan and capital improvement
schedule for the drainage area served by ditch 37 at
this point.
cc: B. Boyum
,
.
.J
- 1 -
<-J
,~l'CA'~'''''''''''''''''''''\\
"'~""',1,., ",
') .~
c;r;, gi
r4, ,jJ'"
~,',I
l;~.~~'f;
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION .
NO, Non-Dlscusslon Items
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
October 15, 1991
Engineering
/
BY:
ITEM street Const/Olesen
NO, . rl 2nd
1'1.
BY:
Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
the streets for Olesen 2nd Addition as requested by the
developer, Gene Olesen.
To date, a sieve analysis for the Class V has been performed
which meets MNDOT Specs. An analysis has been made on the
asphalt. The gradation and density tests are satisfactory.
, MOTION BY
'-./ TO
COUNCil ACTION
SECOND BY
:~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL STREET CONSTRUCTION OF OLESEN
2ND ADDITION AS BEING DEVELOPED BY GENE OLESEN IN SECTION 5-32-
24.
WHEREAS, the developer has completed the streets of Olesen
2nd Addition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to hereby approve the final street construction
of Olesen 2nd Addition contingent upon providing the following:
1. Developer provide a 1 year performance bond or a escrow
as determined by the City Engineer from the date the
bituminous was placed.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
15th
day of
October
1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
victoria Volk - City Clerk
,)
:,)
illCAi"""'''''''''''''''''''''''!;\
I'r", ~:
~~ ;
\,1
'-'i;, ..~..d'
''''-'''''
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 15, 1991
Engineering
~~
AGENDA SECTION .
NO, Non-D~scusslon Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM Accept Petition/91-25
NO,
/ Hidden Creek East 4th
BY:
Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring
adequacy of petition and ordering preparation of a feasibility
report for the the improvement of sanitary sewer, watermain,
streets and storm drain, Project 91-25, in the Hidden Creek East
4th Addition area.
, MOTION BY
'---, TO
COUNCil ACTION
SECOND BY
'-
'J
"-)
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION
OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
WATERMAIN, STREETS AND STORM DRAIN
PROJECT NO. 91-25 , IN THE
AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF SANITARY SEWER,
HIDDEN CREEK EAST 4TH ADDITION
AREA.
WHEREAS, the City Council
September 25, 1991
improvements; and
has received a petition, dated
, requesting the construction of
WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to represent the
signatures of 100% of the affected property owners requesting such
improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover that:
1. The petition is hereby declared to be 100% of owners of
property affected, thereby making the petition unanimous.
2. Escrow amount for feasibility report is
$1,000
3. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to TKDA
and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a
feasibility report.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
day of
Council at a
Meeting this
, with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
.-
~
:r
\
j
II ~ II
z ..
:l! ~
w 0
~ ~
z 8
~ ~
~ -J !:I
=
:R <T
,., N
N
.-
(f)
<
w
~
w
w
a:
()
z
W :
0 " '!'
0
I
~
Z
N W
~
"E
,.,
!2
MN lS HSmlHl. ~
,
" ~ ~ ~ =
I'l
" " '" ... .. .. . 2
,
.I
t~ II
~~
<I:
\ \ \ijlln Mr?la~/
J
J
'~
'CA,,~j"""'~"~'''''''~,
J~ ~-4
f .~
i>J. ~\
~f ~
t~ -',
t\~ ~;;l
'>""""-..,,,#
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDASECTIQN .
NO, Non-Dlscusslon
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
R
ITEM
NO,
Certify Mowing Charges
11.
BY: V. Volk
The City Council is requested to adopt the attached resolution
certifying to the County for payment with the 1992 taxes mowing
charges for the property located at 14288 Round Lake Boulevard.
The amount to be certified, $119.07, includes interest at the
rate of 8%.
MOTION BY
~~ "
'~./ TO
COUNCil ACTION
SECOND BY
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO. R
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING TO THE 1992 TAXES CHARGES FOR MOWING
WEEDS AT 14288 ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD N.W., ANDOVER, MN (PIN
29 32 24 31 0009).
WHEREAS, several complaints were received regarding weeds
growing at 14288 Round Lake Boulevard N.W., and;
WHEREAS, several attempts were made to contact the property
owner to mow said weeds; and
WHEREAS, no response was received from the property owner
and Public Works proceeded to mow the weeds on June 28, 1991.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to certify to the 1992 taxes on the property
known as PIN 29 32 24 31 0009 the amount of $119.07.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
15th
day of
October
, 19 91.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Attest:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
,,)
~.~';:'~""'C'i,""
lCA"~'"
J (,
"c. :/
"~~ ~,_,'Ii\#
-''"''''''M~jJiO
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE OctohPT l~
1 qql
BY: V. Volk
::~~~D~
/
AGENDA _SECTION .
NO, Non-U1SCUSSlon
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
ITEM
NO,
dO.
Certify Sewer Hookup
On May 20, 1991 the city contracted with K's Mechanical to
connect the property located at 2319 South Coon Creek Drive to
the city sanitary sewer and water system.
The city paid for this work to be done with the property owner
requesting that the cost be placed on his 1992 property taxes.
Attached is a resolution certifying this cost ($1,640.50) plus 8%
interest.
COUNCil ACTION
MOTION BY
"-
'-/ TO
SECOND BY
\
,.-J
PIN 27 32 24 32 0020
2319 South Coon Creek Drive
Principal
Interest
Total
)
1992
$1,640.50
131. 24
$1,771.74
Fund 1932
, '\
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NO. R
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING TO THE 1992 TAXES, SANITARY SEWER HOOKUP
CHARGES FOR THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS PIN 27 32 24 32 0020.
WHEREAS, the septic system at 2319 South Coon Creek Drive
failed; and
WHEREAS, sanitary sewer is available to the property; and
WHEREAS, the property owner asked that the city contract for
the hookup due to financial problems; and
WHEREAS, the City contracted with K's Mechanical to connect
the property located at 2319 South Coon Creek Drive to the city's
sanitary sewer and water system.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Andover to certify the cost of connecting the sewer and
water at 2319 South Coon Creek Drive to the 1992 taxes in the
amount of $1,640.50 plus 8% interest for a total of $1,771.74.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this
15th
day of
October
, 19 91.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Attest:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
'\
)
o
, ',",'CA,",!~"""i"~"""'~'~~~""
i(' )
), If
1'" 'J
':;~, . .r$~-'
~~~jpii'~'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Non-Discussion Items
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
October 15, 1991
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
ITEM
NO,
02/,
Declare Costs/91-1,
91-10, 91-14
BY: James E. Schrantz
AP~~~iD )\R
AGE\1()U
BY:/\
I
The City Council is requested to approve two resolutions for each
project - resolution directing cost and directing preparation of
assessment roll and a resolution for hearing on proposed
assessment for 3 projects:
91-1
91-10
91-14
Crosstown Drive
159th Lane, Swallow St, and Quinn Street area
168th Lane
91-1 Crosstown Drive
The Feasibility Report Established Cost was $300, the proposed
assessment $292 per unit. There are 3 parcels that have more
than one unit. One has 2, one has 3 and the other has 4 units.
We are .assessing 21 units.
Note: 5 year assessment at 8% interest is proposed in the
resolution.
91-10 159th Lane, Swallow Street and Quinn street
The Feasibility Report Estimated Cost was $3,230 per unit. At
the public hearing one unit was eliminated and the Estimated Cost
revised to $3,305 per unit, the proposed assessment is $3,065.
This assessment allows for a reasonable solution to the storm
drainage. We are assessing 41 units on 40 lots.
Note: 10 year assessment at 8% is proposed in the resolution.
91-14 168th Lane
The Feasibility Report Estimated Cost was $2,300, the proposed
assessment is $1,980 per unit. There are 14 lots we are
proposing to assess, 13 units. We are proposing not to assess
one of the lots at this time but make it part of the cost and the
COUNCil ACTION
MOTION BY
<)TO
SECOND BY
, ~"
o
roll and we may assess the lot in the future, if the lot can be
made buildable. It will require a great deal of fill to make it
builable.
36% of the storm sewer was not eligible for MSA participation.
Note: 10 year assessment at 8% interest is proposed in the
resolution.
Note: The hearing date is proposed for November 5, 1991 at the
regular meeting. They are scheduled for 7:30, 8:00 and
8:15 or does the Council wish all be scheduled for 7:30?
Or does the Council wish a special meeting?
'\
J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
~
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF STREET CONSTRUCTION
, FOR PROJECT NO. 91-1 CROSSTOWN DRIVE AREA
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$168,450 , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $31,387 and work previously done
amount to $ 0 so that the total cost of the improvement will
be $199,837
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $193,717 and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $6120
2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 5 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or be10re the first Monday in January 92 , and shall
bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
meeting this
day of
, 19
with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
(~ ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
'\
\.......) MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR
PROJECT NO. 91-1
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on October 15 ,
19 91 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the
cost of improvements for Project No. 91-1; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public
inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN:
1. A hearing shall be held the 5 day of Nov. 1991 , in the
City Hall at 8:15 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at
such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to
such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing
on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice
the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be
given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less
than two weeks prior to the hearings.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment
to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the
assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the
entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to
December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must
be made before October 15 or interest will be charged through December 31
of the succeeding year.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19
wi th Councilmen
voting
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
, '-,ATTEST:
'-.J
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria volk - City Clerk
\
,J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROJECT No. 91-1
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Andover,
Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of Andover, on November 5,
1991 at 8:15 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for the
improvement of street construction
in the following described area:
Crosstown Drive
Note: 3 parcels have multiple units (2) (3) (4)
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot,
or parcel of land is $292.00 You may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the entire
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment to the City Treasurer. No interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City
Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is
made. Such payment must be made before October 15 or interest will
be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide
not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the
assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 5 years and shall bear interest at the rate
of 8 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the
assessment is not available.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at
the City Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment
is $6120.00 Written or oral objections will be considered
at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount unless a
signed, written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the
hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The
Council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of
a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such
further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal
upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption
of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court
within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
,J
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
~
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
, FOR PROJECT NO.
STREET AND QUINN STREET AREA
DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
STREET CONSTRUCTION
91-10 159TH LANE, SWALLOW
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$97,963 , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $27,668 and work previously done
amount to $ 0 so that the total cost of the improvement will
be $125,631
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ 0 and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $125,631
2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before-the first Monday in January 92 , and shall
bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
meeting this
day of
, 19
with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
~ ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
~ MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR
PROJECT NO. 91-10
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on October 15 ,
19 91 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the
cost of improvements for Project No. 91-10; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public
inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN:
1. A hearing shall be held the 5 ,day of Nov. 1991 , in the
City Hall at 7:30 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at
such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to
such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing
on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice
the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be
given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less
than two weeks prior to the hearings.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment
to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the
assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the
entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to
December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must
be made before October 15 or interest will be charged through December 31
of the succeeding year.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19
with Councilmen
voting
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
.:,jATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
~,~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 91-10
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Andover,
Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of Andover, on November 5,
1991 at 7:30 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for the
improvement of street construction
in the following described area:
159th Lane, Swallow Street and Quinn Street
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot,
or parcel of land is $3,065 You may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the entire
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment to the City Treasurer. No interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City
Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is
made. Such payment must be made before October 15 or interest will
be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide
not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the
assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years and shall bear interest at the rate
of 8 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the
assessment is not available.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at
the City Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment
is $125,631 Written or oral objections will be considered
at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount unless a
signed, written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the
hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The
Council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of
a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such
further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal
upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption
of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court
within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
, ,
~
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
'\
,~ MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF STREET AND STORM DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION
, FOR PROJECT NO. 91-14 , 168TH LANE BETWEEN
ROUND LAKE BLVD & 350' WEST OF CROCUS STREET .
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$249,344 , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $44,559 and work previously done
amount to $ 0 so that the total cost of the improvement will
be $293,933
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $266,191 and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $27,742
2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January 92 , and shall
bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
meeting this
day of
, 19
with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
,~ '\
\._) ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
, "
,~ MOTION by Councilman
t? adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR
PROJECT NO. 91-14
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on October 15 ,
19 91 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the
cost of improvements for Project No. 91-14; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public
inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN:
1. A hearing shall be held the 5 day of Nov. 1991 , in the
City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at
such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to
such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing
on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice
the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be
given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less
than two weeks prior to the hearings.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment
to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the
assessment. He may at any,time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the
entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to
December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must
be made before October 15 or interest will be charged through December 31
of the succeeding year.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
Meeting this
day of
, 19
with Councilmen
voting
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
" ,ATTEST:
''-.)
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
\
~J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 91-14
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Andover,
Anoka County, Minnesota will meet at the Andover City Hall, 1685
Crosstown Boulevard N.W., in the City of Andover, on November 5,
1991 at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessment for the
improvement of street and storm drainage construction
in the following described area:
168th Lane between Round Lake Blvd. and 350' west of Crocus Street
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot,
or parcel of land is $1,980 You may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the entire
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment to the City Treasurer. No interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City
Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is
made. Such payment must be made before October 15 or interest will
be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide
not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the
assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years and shall bear interest at the rate
of 8 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the
assessment is not available.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at
the City Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment
is $ 27,742 Written or oral objections will be considered
at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount unless a
signed, written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the
hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The
Council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of
a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such
further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal
upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption
of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court
within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/ ,
o
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
':"CA';""'''''''"~'~''''''~''~'
:/ '\
0' ~.~ ,11
\ /"
'1>~_, .
-'~~j, . :IIi'
~.,~~..~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October l5, 1991
AGENDASECTLON .
NO, Non-U1scuss1on
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Admin.
ITEM
NO,
d;?
Declare Costs/
88-30
BY:
V. Volk
The City Council is requested to adopt the two resolutions
attached - Declaring cost & directing preparation of assessment
roll and a resolution for hearing on proposed assessments.
The hearing has been scheduled for November 5th at 8:30 P.M.
This property is in Hartfiel's Estates and the owner requested
sewer and water in 1988. He waived his right to a public hearing
and the project was ordered.
V:Attach.
COUNCil ACTION
/
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'"-
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
o
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN
, FOR PROJECT NO. 88-30 LOT 3, BLOCK 4,
HARTFIEL'S ESTATES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDOVER HEREBY RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, a contract has been entered into for the construction of
the improvements and the contract price for such improvement is
$6,246.81 , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvement amount to $ -0- and work previously done
amount to $ -0- so that the total cost of the improvement will
be $ 6,246.81
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Andover, MN:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City
is hereby declared to be $ -0- and the amount of the cost
to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $ 6,246,81
2. Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January 1992, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in her office for public inspection
4. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a regular
with Councilmen
meeting this 15th day of
October , 19~,
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
/ -\
~ ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
" -\
<<.......) MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT FOR
PROJECT NO. 88-30
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council on October 15
19 91 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of
cost of improvements for Project No. 88-30 ; and
,
the
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public
inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Andover, MN:
l. A hearing shall be held the 5th day of November , in the
City Hall at 8:30 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at
such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to
such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing
on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice
the total cost of improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be
given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less
than two weeks prior to the hearings.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment
to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the
assessment. He may at any time thereafter pay to the City Treasurer the
entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to
December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must
be made before October 15 or interest will be charged through December 31
of the succeeding year.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
Council at a
regular
Meeting this 15th day of October
, 19-.2.!,
voting
with Councilmen
in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
~r-',\ ATTEST:
,~)
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
'lfCAf"""""""""'~\'
'C'~
'~,',J , ,,'"~,
[1 ~
~"\~'" y'
-- "'"'
~'
,~.~ '" ..
~--"
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
October 15,
AGENDA SECTION
NO, Non-Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
Howard D. Koolick~
Finance Director
BY:
ITEM Receive September
NO, ~ Financial Statements
d) 0/... .
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to receive the September
1991 financial statements for the General, Water and Sewer Funds.
Should there be any questions about an item, please contact me
prior to the meeting so that I may have adequate time to research
the question.
COUNCil ACTION
MOTION BY
'-- TO
SECOND BY
(, i
i2l
,.
13, )
CITY OF ANDOVER
YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES
FOR
GENERAL, WATERANDiSEWER FUNO
As of 30Sep91
1"1
51
C1
~.7
18
's
,
::2J
.,!
'"
-,
'"'
Revised
Budget
Year' to Oate
Actual
G E N ERA L
REV E N
FUN D
U E S
-----------------------
-----------------------
::21,' 3
:i~1
~
.6.
GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES
BUSINESS LICENSESANO PER~HTS
NON-BUSINlSS LICENSES & PERMITS
Building Related
Other'
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
Stt'eet Lighting
Ot nE' r-
COURT FINES
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
Interest Earned
Refunds and Reimbursements
Of; h€, r'
TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS
From Admin. Trust Fund
F.'om TIF 1-1 Fund
From TIF 1-2 Fund
90.000.00
24,000.00
6,000.00
1,072.643.00
18,200.00
'7
199.910.00
5,600.00
592,199.00
.,
. ~i
~
_:c:
-j
51,500.00
20.850.00
59.000.00
--:;
...,
30.000.00
30.000.00
4.300.0('
578.927.78
9,166.60
160.951,6"
5.141.74
394,332.57
27,069.78
20.31';'.42
24,926.81
Il~ 1 . 00
9.341,.31;
8.221.90
:;.93~:':1
~'e r.c:e nt a 9E'
Remaining
46
1,9
, 9
E~
33
47
:.-'
57
se
72
(.;
100
1 Cio
100
TOTAL REVENUE
2.204.202.00
I',
'"
------------
------------
1,242.540.13
------------
------------
~
:
- ''\
J
/
21
'-2i
~I
_3:
~ ...
=1
~
'"7!
-
~ J
.,
~
~
'':1
. 4:
'5,
6:
71
~
91
,
c)
.,
;::1
3'
.:J
"
~
5:
c,
7i
--i
2.!
~
CITY OF MWOVER
YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES
FOR
34,108.00
6.831.00
4,200.00
105.171.00
PLANNING AND ZONING
DATA PROC:E~:SING
CITY HALL SUILOIN~
FIRE STATION BUILDING
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
SENIOR CITIZEN S CENTER
EQUIPMENT BUILDING
ENGINE.ERING
POLICE PROTECTION
FIRE PROTECTION
RESCUE SERVICE
PROTECTIVE INSPECTION
CIVIL DEFENSE
ANIMAL CONTROL
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
SNOW AND ICE REMOVAL
STORM SEWERS
E;TR E ET llCiHTlNG
STREET SIGNS
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
STREETLIGHTS-BILLED
PARK AND RECREATION
TREES AND WEED CONTROL
RECYCLING
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
UNALLOCATED
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
OTHER FINANCING USES
bv..:<U
50.702.00
H'.OSS.OO
3b,l>33.0U
1lJ,.190.00
23.600.00
36,907.55
17.535.36
28.214.bS
7.491.65
18,911.78
f/.. 8 88. 91J
833.06
40.838.15
201,l'i41.72
128.076.06
23,251.14
92.576.9/
911.10
/.436.93
119.668.27
64.890.61
8.160.98
S;.280.45
18.375.86
4.752.8~'
27,086.06
158,356.02
4,372.32
21.1i'8.~)8
12.402.64
29.007.23
31.746.20
18
75
18
25
27
8
18
47
19
49
76
42
50
44
37
27
60
1 E:
44
46
64
38
41
(58)
28
27
53
42
25
56
( 148)
3j
~ r )
-
8.63~. 0
3.593.00
71.165.00
404,078.00
231.597.00
37,057.00
1:2 7.53 CJ . 00
2.300.00
9.096.00
213,788.00
122.352.00
22.821.00
15.000.00
31,606.00
3.000.00
38,000.00
21S,897.00
9.476.00
3'/.129.00
16.544.00
67.317.00
12.800.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
2.204.202.00 1,383,086.00
------------ ------------
------------ ------------
37
~
,
~
~
-...,
- I, I
CITY OF ANDOVER
YEAR TO DATE SUMMARIES
FOR
G EN ERAL, WATERA~D?ISf:W,gR}j=IJNPS,
As of 30Sep91
-------------------
-------------------
-j
-,
~l
WATER SALES
METER SALES
F' U: M I T FEE 0'
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
198;072;00
,20,000;00
10,000.00
5.000.00
89,840.63
21.813.00
e.bbll.UlI
10,41,5.78
54
(9 )
14
( 108)
.;;
,
~
~
"
TOTAL REVENUE
43
------------
-----------.-
------------
------------
W ATE 1-:
t. X ~' t N
FUN D
, , ,
.:. c. ,:,
-------------------
-------------------
:;.: LJ U ~ I~: t.. ~;: t..) f\: tu...~ I: AN U I ~~ t. ,4 T M 2. i'J I
OISTRIP..UTION
ADMINI~;TRATION
lb.48:,.CIO
112,382.00
44,195.00
LlI.b~I/.2:,
61.543.81
32.336.10
n
45
26
TOTAL WATER FUND EXPENSES
233.072.00
114.577.16
50
------------
------------
------------
------------
0,
- , ')
CITY OF ANDOVER
360.469.00
1.000.00
30.500.00
~
~
: 'I
c:i
1
.:,1
~
"
"
....:J
~!
"
il
.
-,
=.:J
3;
-,
~I
--'
'..>;
-2i
~
",
1
-j
.ZI
,
21
j
-1
5j
-0,
7,
Si
5!
~
"
-J
;,
-::1
"
i 1
:1
-!
"
~
TOTAL SEWER REVENUE
391.S69.00
187.083.08
52
--- -- ---.--
------------
---------- -
----.---------
S E 'vi E R
E X F' E N
FUN D
c' c:- c:
-' '- ,-'
----------- --------
--------------------
COLLECTIOrJ
Metropolitan Waste Control
Other Expenses
ADMINISTRATION
243.781.00
70.732.00
77.456.00
203,1S0.00
33.030.87
19.528.21
16
53
74
TOTAL SEWER EXPENSES
391,969.00
25S.709,08
34
------------
------------
------------
------------
-""'--"""".'-"'''''''~ '"' "'~ -~'''''''-. -- . ..-.".- -.~.
,
--r
/0
c,c
10)5/1/
LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES, INC.
7501 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley. Minnesota 55427
612/546,1470
FAX: 612/546,1552
,.-;-: '.t;;-j-..'j-;:;",,)
: t'--'~ tr~ ~ " \~ :; ~:~ ~~ i ~,
'j",~ La tlJ1 t~~. "-'" lJ1 '
"- --"."'--1,"
/C\\~ 'I"
'il \~\ .'(C" q 1991 I I
::." .. " I
~, .
-
October 10, 1991
CITY OF t,\[';JOV:::::<
TO: Clients of LRA and Subscribers to LMC/City Managers
Labor Relations Subscription service
FROM: Cyrus F. smythe & Karen A. Olsen
SUBJECT: DETERMINATIONS OF "COMPLIANCE"/"NON-COMPLIANCE" WITH THE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT PAY EQUITY ACT (LGPEA) BY STATE
DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS (DOER) DURING 1992 AND
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS AVAILABLE TO STATE POLITICAL
SUBDIVISIONS
A. DOER's STANDARDS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH LGPEA
The DOER, despite the stated objections of many public
employers, appears determined to use a statistical "model" for
making determinations concerning a political subdivision's
"compliance" with the LGPEA which relies solely on a review of a
political subdivision's job values and maximum salaries. The model
fails to recognize market values as mitigating factors in such
determinations despite the provision in Section 471.993 of the
LGPEA that compensation paid outside the political subdivision
shall be considered. Nor does the model take into account wage
rates established by interest arbitration decisions.
B. WHAT CONSTITUTES COMPLIANCE UNDER THE MODEL
Political subdivisions which have moved the maximum.salaries
for all of their job classifications to their "all jobs" regression
line (100% line) should experience little difficulty with DOER
compliance decisions under its new model: While some subdivisions
with maximum salaries for all job classifications at the 100% line
may be found to be in "non-compliance" by DOER for a few job
classifications because of the model's segmented approach to
analysis (called "windows" by the model), the cost of "compliance"
should be minimal.
Most subdivisions, however, which have not moved the maximum
salaries of all job classifications to their all jobs line and
,which have compensation systems with more male-dominated than
female-dominated job classifications with maximum salaries above
,
the 100% line will generally find that they are not in compliance.
Unfortunately, many political subdivisions will find themselves in
this situation.
C. WHAT SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED BY POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS AS
THE BASIS FOR PAYMENT OF THEIR EMPLOYEES IN THE FUTURE?
Attaining "compliance" with the existing LGPEA based on
standards developed by the DOER to review only the salary
relationships between males and females should not be the
determining force behind a subdivision's employee compensation
system. The DOER standards have changed significantly since the
passage of the LGPEA and will without doubt continue to evolve. Of
greater importance to a political subdivision than the short-run
problem of "compliance" with "the DOER model of the time" (which
mayor may not withstand court challenges based on the model's
compatibility with the law) is a longer-run and more significant
question. That question is - what should be the underlying basis
for a subdivision's decisions concerning the compensation of all of
its employees?
The State's passage of a comparable worth law (LGPEA) in 1984
focused the attention of public employees in an irrevocable manner
on the level of compensation they receive relative to their job
value and the market wage rate for their job. Employees,
therefore, of the State's political subdivisions now expect to be
paid on the basis of more definitive and defensible criteria than
they did prior to 1984. They expect the compensation system under
which they are paid to be equitable for all employees and openly
debated. If the system does not meet these expectations, they are
increasingly willing to challenge it.
The necessary temporary concentration by political
subdivisions on the standards for "compliance" being used by DOER
should not cause the subdivisions to lose sight of the more
significant problem the problem of the development of a
compensation philosophy which will provide for the payment of
employees in a manner perceived by the majority of employees,
elected officials, and the public as a rational one. If a
political subdivision merely meets the mandates of the DOER to
adj ust the compensation of selected female-dominated job
classifications and ignores the impact of these adjustments on the
system of compensation for all employees, the subdivision will
inevitably find that the DOER's requirements have little to do with
the development and maintenance of the "equitable/reasonable
compensation relationships" between all employees required by the
LGPEA. Such a subdivision will satisfy DOER but it will create new
compensation inequity problems which its employees and/or the
employees' unions will demand be resolved.
Based on preliminary analyses performed for individual
subdivisions by the DOER using its "model", many subdivisions have
found that they are not in "compliance". These subdivisions should
not assume, however, that they have no choice but to make the
,
changes in compensation outlined by the DOER based on its stated
reason(s) for "non-compliance". The subdivisions will have a'
number of different "solutions" available to it to attain
"compliance". They can consider:
1. Making the adjustments in compensation indicated by the
DOER regardless of impact on overall compensation
comparisons between all employees.
This solution would not be recommended by experts in
compensation since it fails to recognize the more important
long-run problem of developing the "equitable and
reasonable compensation relationships" for all employees
based on both comparable job and market value as required
by the LGPEA.
2. studying the reasons for non-compliance and attempting to
change the DOER determination by filing an appeal of the
determination based on such factors as interest arbitration
awards and recruitment and/or retention considerations -
factors which must be considered by DOER on appeal.
There is no reason for a political subdivision not to
perfunctorily file an appeal of a non-compliance
determination by DOER if it persists in the use of a
model which fails to take into account factors specifically
mandated by the LGPEA for evaluating employee compensation
levels. Subdivisions may well find that some of the unions
with which they negotiate will join them in an appeal to
DOER or a lawsuit challenging the use of the DOER model
since the model's specific non-consideration of "market"
wage rates is also wholly unacceptable to a number of
Minnesota unions.
3. changing the organizational structure by combining jobs,
eliminating jobs, or modifying jobs so that the
job value/compensation comparisons are modified.
A number of political subdivisions have found that they can
achieve a compensation system which brings them closer to
compliance by combining/eliminating jobs so as to reduce
the number of comparisons the DOER can make under its
"model" without makina any chanaes in compensation.
4. changing the job value/compensation comparisons in the
future by limiting wage increases for jobs which cause non-
compliance while increasing the compensation of other jobs.
Many subdivisions have been involved in freezing the base
wage rates of "overcompensated" job classifications based
on an "all jobs" regression analysis while providing
additional increases to "undercompensated" job
classifications. Use of this strategy over the past few
years has brought some subdivisions into compliance or near
,
compliance - particularly when combined with changes in
organization structure which eliminated certain jobs which.
caused severe comparison problems.
5. SUbcontracting work to private sector employers.
A number of subdivisions have realized considerable
economic savings in recent years by subcontracting work to
private sector employers. Such subcontracting of work has
been used generally for the purpose of obtaining equivalent
service levels at lower cost. The anticipated costs of
compliance with the LGPEA has caused additional
subdivisions to consider this alternative.
Subsequently, there is no substantive reason why a political
subdivision should hasten to take immediate action if it is found
to be in non-compliance by the DOER. The filing of an appeal may
bring some relief from the first determination's impact since the
DOER does not consider in its initial determination interest
arbitration awards, retention/recruitment problems, or market wage
rates.
There is also a reasonable probability that the "model"
developed for DOER to make determinations concerning compliance
will be successfully challenged in court under a joint effort by
some public employers and unions and be modified or nullified.
Subdivisions should bear in mind that the real issue raised by
the LGPEA was, and is, compensation equity between all emplovees of
a subdivision based on the commonly used criteria to judge
compensation equity - job value and "market" wage rates. The
subdivisions should remind themselves that the issue of pay equity
for all employees will continue to be an issue long after the
adjustments required by DOER based on its present relatively narrow
concerns have been met.
Additionally, there is reason to believe that the LGPEA will
be expanded in future years, as has been the case with the State's
Human Rights Act, to cover compensation relationships and race,
color, creed, religion, national origin, marital status,
disability, and age. Such possibility gives additional rationale
to the philosophy that a subdivision should concern- itself now
primarily with the development of "equitable/reasonable
compensation relationships" between all of its employees rather
than only with those of immediate concern to the DOER's "model".
,
08-0ct-91
STANTON GROUP VI CITIES
WITH FULL- TIME POLICE OFFICERS
MONTHLY CITY INSURANCE CONTRIBUTION FOR TOP PATROL OFFICER
Poc,. Q!y 1985 '98a 1987 198e '989 1990 1991 ~
9,444 Mound $215.93 $193.33 $217.75 $220.00 $226,10 5254,56 NS
9,430 Savage $167,40 S167.40 $170.00 $180,00 $209.63 5209.63 $240.74
6,965 Mandata Heights $155.00 $165.00 $175.00 $165.00 $205.00 $225,00 $250,00
6,334 St. Anthony $155,00 $'65,00 $170.00 $175,00 $'90.00 $205,00 $225,00
6,235 Uno Lakes $145.00 $155,00 $'60.00 $170.00 $160,00 $200,00 $225.00 $240.00
6,014 Rosemount $117.74 $154.00 S1ee.73 $176.82 $167.83 $194.82
7,379 Orono $141.49 $151.00 $168.00 $176,00 $'91.90 5211 ,00 5231 ,00
7,037 Spring lake Park $160,00 $176.00 5186.00 $190.00 $200.00 $210.00 reopener
6,879 2 Circle PineS/lexington S100.00 $121.50 $121.50 $'65.00 $'95,00 $225.00 $245.00
5,662 6 Farmington $167.85 $'32,00 $132.00 $302.37 $302.37 $41522 $359,00
5,400 Forest lake $161,66 $157,64 $176.00 $195,00 $200,00 $220.00 $240.00
5,116 Corcoran $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $220,00 $225,00
4,972 St. Paul Park $150.00 $170,00 S190,OO $210.00 $210.00 $230.00 NS
4.923 3 MlnnetrlstalSt. Bonitacius $167.'0 $180,00 $190.00 $190.00 $195,00 $215,00 $230.00
4,578 4 W. Hennepin Co. PSD $237.50 $260.00 $260.00 $275,00 $295,00 $300.00 $412.00
4,125 Dayton $126.10 $125.90 $'25.90 $'25.90 Reports only one part-time officer.
3,938 Wayzata $160.00 $170.00 $'80.00 $180,00 $205,00 $230.00 $245.00 TBD
3,773 Deep haven $155.00 $165.00 $175.00 $'85.00 $205,00 $225.00 $245,00
3,587 Newport $175.00 $185.00 $'65,00 $205.00 $225.00 $245,00 $260~00
3,482 5 Oak Park Heights
3,272 Medina $243.00 $254.00 $254.00 $269.00 $280,00 $291,00 $303,00
3,071 Belle Plains $167.00 $167.00 $'67.00 $250.00 $250.00 $265,00 reopener
2,767 Jordan $184.66 $174,68 $174.00 $253.88 $254.96 $250.00 $280,00
2,743 Osseo $190.80 $192.00 $20' ,00 $291.00 $291.00 5291.00 NS
2,482 New Prague $215.00 $215,00 $292.33 $231.94 $231.94 $25924 $272 20
2,202 St. Francis $85,00 $85.00 $65.00 595.00 $95.00 $95,00 $95,00
1,742 Bayport $133.00 $143.00 $'98.40 $164.10 $220,66 $24227 reopener
5,244 AVERAGES $1114,71 $170.18 $181.49 $203,89 $2'7.66 $231.'5 $254.61 $'20.00
1. Spring Lake Parle In lieu of longevity, City provides Officers with an additional 2% at 7 & 9 years of service which is shown 8S the top rate.
2. Circle Pines/Lexington: Includes the cities of Circle Pines (4,764), Lexington (2, 115) and Centerville (1,700).
3. MinnetristalSt. 8onlfaclus: Includes the cities of Minnetrista (3,765) and St. Bonifacius (1,138).
4. W. Hennepin Co. PSO: Includes the citles of: Independence and Maple Plains.
5. Oak Park Heights: Insurance rate based on age; no comparable figures.
6. Farmington: For '991 City contribution of HeatthlUfe and Dental, and City contributes 65% of full premium.
,
08-0ct-91
STANTON GROUP VI CITIES
WITH FULL- TIME POLICE OFFICERS
MONTHLY WAGE RATES FOR TOP PATROL OFFICER
POD.. ~ 1985 1986 '987 1988 '989 1990 .1fi1
9,444 Mound $2,521,00 $2,672,00 $2,760,00 $2,892.00 $2,935.00 $2,979.00 NS
9,430 Savage $2,404.00 $2.536.00 $2,637.00 $2,742.00 $2,852.00 $2,995.00 53,114.80
8,982 Mendata Heights $2,454.00 $2,564.00 $2,667.00 $2,780.00 $2,857,00 $2,971.00 53.000.00
8,334 Sl Anthony $2,452.00 $2,550.00 $2,652.00 $2,745.00 $2,828,00 $2,941.00 $3,OSS.00
8,235 Uno Lakes $2,448,00 $2,550.00 $2,678.00 $2,785,00 $2,898.00 $2,971.00 $3,057.00
8.D14 ~osemount $2,368,00 $2,466.00 $2,566.00 $2,689.00 $2,804.00 $2,9Zl,OO $2,943.85
7,379 Orono $2,424.00 $2,533.00 $2,628,00 $2,629.00 $2,815.00 $2,908.00 $3,000.75
7,037 Spring Lake Park $2,529.00 $2,631.00 52,7:l6,OO 52,917,00 $3,019,00 53, I 70.00 53,329.00
8,879 2 Circle Pines/Lexington $2,295.00 $2,410.00 52,535,00 52,649.00 $2,755,00 $2,865.00 52,951,00
5,882 Farmington 52,320.00 52.422,00 52,518.00 52,620.00 52.724.00 52,847.00 52,975.00
5,400 Forest lake 52,421,00 $2,494.00 52,594.00 52,696,00 52,800.00 S2.917.00 53,034.03
5,118 Corcoran S 1 ,647 .00 51,733,00 52,340,00 $2,456.00 52,785.00 52,909.70 $3,027.00
4,972 St. Paul Park 52,413.00 $2,647.00 52,772.00 $2,895,00 $2,953,00 S3.071. 1 2 NS
4,923 3 Minnetrists/St. Bonifaclus $2,303.00 $2,396,00 $2,491.00 $2,572.00 $2,650.00 $2,850.00 $2,964.00
4,578 4 W. Hennepin Co. PSD $2,405,00 52,525,00 52,500.00 $2,600.00 52.7:0.00 52,833.00 $2,958,00
4,125 Dayton $2,250.00 $2,419.00 $2.517.00 $2,658,00 $2.691.00 Only one part- time officer
3,938 Wayzata 52,424.00 $2,533.00 52,634,00 $2,740.00 $2,803.00 $2,963,00 $3,053.63
3,773 Deep haven $2,447.00 $2,557,00 $2,6SS.00 52,752.00 $2,848.00 $2.962.00 53,000.01
3,587 Newport 52,493.00 $2,620,00 $2,745.00 52,873.00 $3,004.00 $3,110.00 53,217,00
3,482 Oak Park Heights 52,464,00 52,583.00 52,673~00 $2,780.00 52,891.00 53,007,00 53,127.00
3,272 Medina 52,437.00 52,548.00 52,6Zl,OO $2,701,00 52,808.00 52,948,00 53,068.27
3,071 8elle Plains $1.670.00 $1,754.00 $1,842.00 $1,934.00 $2,042.00 52,163.09 $2,294.82
2,767 Jordan 52.010.00 52,130.00 52,364.00 $2,459,00 52.507.84 52,558.00 52,629.62
2,743 Osseo $2, I 20.00 52,205.00 52,293,00 52,293.00 52,401.00 $2,500.00 NS
2,482 New Prague $2,018.00 52,129.00 $2.214.00 $2,321.00 52,46::>.00 52,583~00 52,718,00
2,202 St Francis $1,500.00 $1,705.00 51,949.00 52,071.00 $2,263.00 $2,373,00 $2,474.00
1,742 Bayport 52,176,00 $2,285.00 52,399.00 $2,483,00 $2,682.00 $2.818.00 52,929.00
$2,522,8 l'
$2,622;00,
$2,735,14
$2,851;23
$2,9sg,P!;
Population figures based on 4/1/00 population estimates provided by Metropolitan Council. In determining the average population all cities, including
those lncorpolllted Into larger un~ are Included.
1. Spring Lake Parle In lieu of longevtty, City provides Otficers with an additional 2% at 7 & 9 yews at service which is shown as the top rate.
2. Circle Pines/lexington: Includes the cities of: Circle Pines (4.764), Lexington (2.115). and Centerville (1,700).
3. MlnnetristaJSt Bonifaclus: Includes the cities of: Minnetrista (3,785) and St. Bonifacius (1,138).
4. W. Hennepin CO. PSO: Includes the cities of: Independence (2,746) and Maple Plaine (1,832).
1992
$3,214.00
$3,179.00
53,068.96
53,116.23
$3,252.00
$3;100.04
-- --
~
008-0ct-91
STANTON GROUP V
MONTHLY WAGE RATES FOR TOP PATROL OFFICER
Community 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
Anoka $2,221,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,684,00 $2,731,00 $2,827,00 $2,952,00 $3,081.00
Apple Valley $2,224,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,570,00 $2,675,00 $2,782,00 $2,893,00 $3,009,00 $3,129,00
Blaine $2,224,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,658,00 $2,711,00 $2,765,00 $2,931,00 $3,034,00
Bloomington $2,244,00 $2,339,00 $2,456,00 $2,567,00 $2,670,00 $2,783,00 $2,894,00 $2,995,00 $3,115,00
Brooklyn Center $2,224,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,565.00 $2,671,00 $2,767,00 $2,872,00 $2,990,00 $3,113,00
Brooklyn Park $2,224,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,664,00 $2,757,00 $2,853.00 $2,967,00 $3,085,00
Bumsville $2,297,00 $2,3n,oo $2,486,00 $2,585,00 $2,688,00 $2,790,00 $2,881.00 $2,975,00 $3,094,00
Champlin not Group V not Group V $2,475,00 $2,574,00 $2,6n,oo $2,744,00 $2,826,00 $2,939,33 NS
Chaska not Group V not Group V not Group V not Group V not Group V $2,716,00 $2,813,00 $2,934,00 $3,056,00
Columbia Haights $2,224,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,660,00 $2,753,00 $2,849,00 $2,991,00 $3,111.00
1 Coon Raplds $2,250,00 $2,375.00 $2,470,00 $2,581,00 $2,664,00 $2,765,00 $2,848,00 $2,933,00 $3,050,00 $3,172,00
Cottage Grove $2,215,00 $2,306.00 $2,432,00 $2,553,00 $2,655,00 $2,761.00 $2,871,00 $2,986,00 $3,105,44
Crystal $2,224,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,6n,oo $2,784.00 $2,895.00 $3,011.00 $3,131,00
Eagan $2,293,00 $2,385,00 $2,463,00 $2,549,00 $2,651.00 $2,718,00 $2,799.00 $2,959.00 $3,On.00
Eden Prairie $2,355,00 $2,485,00 $2,621.00 $2,752,00 $2,862,00 $2,975.00 $3,209.00 $3,305.00 $3,405.00
Edina $2,240,00 $2,362,00 $2,480,00 $2,605,00 $2,683,97 $2,791,33 $2,902,98 $3,019,10 $3,139,76
Fridley $2,224,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,664,00 $2,757,00 $2,853.00 $2,967,00 $3,086,00
Golden Valley $2,224,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,670,00 $2,nO,13 $2,860,16 $2,974,00 $3,093,00
Hastings $2,204,00 $2,325,00 $2,430,00 $2,540,00 $2,606,00 $2,682,62 $2,789,92 $2,901,52 $3,017,58
Hopkins $2,220,00 $2,341,00 $2,440,00 $2,550,00 $2,652,00 $2,754,00 $2,850,00 $2,964,00 $3,083,00
Inver Grove Hgts $2,224,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,667,00 $2,760,00 $2,854,00 $2,954,00 $3,087.00 reopener
Lakeville $2,213,00 $2,252,00 $2,452,00 $2,576,00 $2,678,00 $2,785,00 $2,894,00 $3,015.00 $3,155.00
Maple Grove $2,207,00 $2,270,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,664,00 $2,760,00 $2,869,25 $2,992,58 $3,112,28 $3,236,n
Maplewood $2,224,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,664,00 $2,744,00 $2,853.00 $2,966.00 $3,078,00 $3,172,00
Minnetonka $2,240,00 $2,358,00 $2,476,00 $2,600,00 $2,717,00 $2,825,33 $2,936,00 $3,029,08 NS
Mounds View $2,212,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,684,00 $2,744,00 $2,854,00 $2,975,30 $3,105,32
2 New Brighton $2,224,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,684,00 $2,nl,oo $2,882,00 $2,988,63 $3,099.21
New Hope $2,224,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,684,00 $2,n2.oo $2,876.00 $2,991,00 NS
4 North St Paul $2,224,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,684,00 $2,757,00 $2,853,00 $2,909,55 NS
Oakdale $2,224,00 $2,335.00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,652,00 $2,744,82 $2,840,88 $2,957,00 $3,081,00
Plymouth $2,224,00 $2,335.00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,684.00 $2,n1.oo $2,889,00 $3,033,00 $3,154,00
PriorLaka not Group V not Group V not Group V not Group V not Group V $2,730,00 $2,839,00 $2,973,85 $3,115,11
Ramsey $2,229,00 $2,336,00 $2,440,92 $2,538,58 $2,840,16 $2,741.83 $2,837,79 $2,937,12 $3,047,20
Richfield $2,236,00 $2,339,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,684,00 $2,763,00 $2,873.52 $2,988.46 $3,108,00
Robbinsdale $2,224,00 $2,335.00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,684,00 $2,757,00 $2,854,00 $2,997,00 $3,108,00
Roseville $2,224,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,684,00 $2,757.74 $2,854.26 $2,968.00 $3,087,00
5t Louis Park $2,251.40 $2,370,23 $2,489,00 $2,601.00 $2,705,00 $2,793,00 $2,904,74 $3,020.94 $3,141.78 $3,243,89
ShakoPee $2,202,90 $2,291.00 $2,410,00 $2,518,00 $2,632,00 $2,727,05 $2,819,39 $2,932,17 $2,990,81
3 S Lk Minnetonka not Group V not Group V not Group V not Group V not Group V not Group V not Group V $2,920,00 $3,037.00
South St Paul $2,303,00 $2,412,39 $2,521,00 $2,622,00 $2,727.00 $2,822,09 $2,920,86 $3,037.69 $3,174,39
Stillwater $2,230,00 $2,337,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,653,00 $2,759,12 $2,870.00 $2,986,00 $3,105,00
West St Paul $2,224,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,684,00 $2,784,00 $2,874,00 $2,991.00 NS
White Bear Lake $2,224,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,664,00 $2,763,00 $2,859,70 $2,959,80 $3,092.96
Woodbury $2,245,00 $2,335,00 $2,452,00 $2,562,00 $2,664,00 $2,758,00 $2,854.00 $2,961.03 $3,079,00
AVERAGES $2,234,11 $2,340,n $2,459,56 $2,570,06 $2,671,59 $2,784,23 $2,867,60 $2,981.53 $3,101.84 $3,206,17
1 Coon Raplds-Employee. are paid a shift differentiaJ in addition to base rate,
2 New Brighton-Wage rate will be adjusted to Stanton Group V Average on July t, t991.
3 South Lake Minnetonka PSD-Includes the cities of: Excelsior (2,530); Shorewood (5,815); Greenwood (683): and Tonka Bay (1,487),
4 North Sl Paul - Employees to receive lump sum paymentfor 1990 only of 0,5%
.
08-0et-91
STANTON GROUP V
MONTHLY EMPLOYER INSURANCE CONTRIBUTIONS
FOR TOP PATROL
Community 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
Anoka $145,03 $ 154,53 $157,52 $165,75 $172,80 $ 170.00 $190.00 $205.00 $225.00
Apple Velley $125.00 $145,00 $155.00 $170,00 $185.00 $192.00 $210.00 $225,00 $240,00
Blaine $125,00 $145,00 $155,00 $165.00 $ 175,00 $185,00 $195.00 $210.00 $210.00
Bloomington $160,05 $173,00 $192,74 $204.25 $212,00 $225.00 $235,00 $256.33 $277.04
Brooldyn Center $125,00 $145,00 $155.00 $ 165.00 $175,00 $ 185.00 $215.00 $240.00 $260,00
Brooldyn Park $125.00 $145.00 $155,00 $ 160,00 $165.00 $ 175.00 $195.00 $205.00 $215.00
Burnsville $137,00 $ 170.00 $ 180,00 $193,00 $207.00 $200,00 $210.00 $220.00 $230,00
Champlin not Group V not Group V $ 189,04 $192.75 $205,10 $221,00 $284,10 $294,67 NS
Chaska not Group V not Group V not Group V not Group V not Group V $217,00 $224.00 $235,00 $247.00
Columbia Heights $125.00 $145,00 $155,00 $165,00 $175,00 $185.00 $200.00 $215.00 $235.00
Coon Rapids $125,00 $140.00 $155,00 $165,00 $178.35 $180.00 $200.00 $210.00 $220,00 $230.00
Cottage Grove $169,40 $184.40 $194.40 $199.20 $205,20 $185.00 $ 196,00 $220,00 $250.00
Crystal $ 125,00 $ 145,00 $155.00 ' $165.00 $175,00 $185,00 $195,00 $220,00 $245,00
Eagan $169.50 $180,00 $190,00 $199,50 $201,15 $238.39 $260.00 TBD TBD
Eden Prairie $ 125,00 $145.00 $155,00 $165,00 $198,53 $203.63 $200,00 $212,60 $250,00
Edina $ 120.00 $130,00 $140,00 $150.00 $160,00 $ 170.00 $ 180,00 $ 190,00 $220,00
Fridley $125.00 $ 145,00 $155,00 $165,00 $175,00 $185,00 $210.00 $225,00 $255,00
Goiden Valley $134,00 $154,00 $164,00 $174,00 $184.00 $205.00 $229.00 $247,00 $264,00
Hastings $204,60 $204,60 $204,60 $204.60 $242.85 $252.60 $256.00 $263.70 $277,05
Hopkins $ 148.89 $160.00 $160.00 $ 170.00 $175.00 $ 190.00 $225.00 $247.50 $260.00
lover Grove Hgts $ 125.00 $ 145.00 $155.00 $185,00 $ 185.00 5200.00 5220,00 $240,00 $270.00 reopener
Lakeville $196.92 5195,00 $ 195,00 $ 184,94 5204.02 5270.62 5242,12 $258.39 5298.50
Maple Grove $182.79 5210.13 $ 155.00 $ 165,00 5175,00 5195.00 5195,00 $ 195.00 5230.00 5260.00
Maplewood 5130.00 $120,00 5120,00 $130.00 $140.00 5150.00 5224.50 5224,50 5225,00
Minnetonka $198.30 5198,50 5208,00 $211.00 5221.62 $237.32 5291.25 $320,00 NS
Mounds View $125,00 $ 145.00 $ 155,00 $165.00 $ 175,00 $ 185.00 $200.00 $220.00 $250,00
New Brighton $ 125,00 $145.00 $ 165.00 $175.00 $ 185,00 $ 190.00 $220.00 $225.00 $240.00
New Hope $ 125,00 $ 145,00 $155.00 $ 185.00 $179,00 $ 195.00 $225.00 $273.00 TBD
North St Paul $125.00 $140.00 $150.00 $ 160,00 $170.00 $185.00 $ 195,00 $ 195,00 NS
Oakdale $125.00 $145.00 $ 155.00 $ 165,00 $ 175,00 $185,00 $ 195,00 5210,00 $235.00
Plymouth $161,00 $ 182.00 $191,00 $203.90 $213,90 $222,90 $242.90 $262. 90 $275.00
1 Prior Lake not Group V not Group V not Group V not Group V not Group V $280.00 $236.65 $243,10 $256,22
Ramsey $125.00 $ 140,00 $150,00 $160,00 $172.00 $182,00 $ 194.00 $207,00 $230.00
Richfield $104,10 $138.00 $158,00 $ 168.30 $ 177,80 $187.80 $ 197,80 $210.00 $240.00
Robbinsdale $125.00 $145.00 5165.00 $175.00 5185,00 5195.00 5205.00 $220.00 5230,00
Roseville $140.00 5160,00 5170,00 $ 180.00 $190.00 $200,00 5220.00 $235.00 5250,00
St Louis Park $118,00 5130.00 5140,00 5150,00 $160,00 $170,00 $210.00 5235,00 $270.00 $300.00
Shakopea 5150,00 $195,00 5206.82 5216,82 $226,82 $236.82 $246.82 $255.00 $255,00
S Lk Minnetonka not Group V not Group V not Group V not Group V not Group V not Group V not Group V $258.62 $271,62
South St Paul 5138.55 5151,50 $176,50 5176,50 5195,00 5209,00 $219.00 $239.00 $259,00
Stillwater $125,00 $145.00 5155.00 $160,00 5180,00 $185,00 $196.00 5205,00 $220.00
2 West St Paul 5125,00 $145.00 5155,00 $165,00 $170,00 $190.00 $210.00 $230.00 $250.00
White Bear Lake 5125.00 5145,00 $155,00 $165,00 5175,00 $185,00 $200,00 $215.00 $240,00
Woodbury $131,95 $147,00 5168,80 5188,30 $ 198,30 $199.95 $222,55 $217.18 ~5271,53
AVERAGES 5138,50 5155,57 5165':16" $174.41 $185,82, 5199;68 5216.69 5225.76 $247;36 5:163;33
Prior lake: Prior lake was added to the Stanton Group V cities in 1988. The 1988 monthly insurance contribution was a variable rate based on
the age of the employee, so that the top dollar amount figured at 5333,18; on average would be 5278-$280, the top end of the avages is
used in this report In 1989. the City changed carriers so that a composite rate is used which is not based on age.
2 West 51. Paul is not settled for 1991, the only issue not up for arbitration is insurance.
TBD - To Be Determined
DATE: October 15, 1991
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Planning and Zoning Minutes - September 24, 1991
Comprehensive Plan Task Force Minutes - September 26, 1991
Regular City Council Minutes - October 1, 1991
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes - October 3, 1991
Letter from Richard Clark, MN Dept of Health - September 25, 1991
Letter from Edward Treska, County of Anoka - September 30, 1991
Memo from David Almgren - October 1, 1991
Letter from Doris Nivala, City of Ham Lake - October 1, 1991
Letter from Mayor, Andover, Hampshire - October 1, 1991
Memo from Vicki Volk - October 7, 1991
Memo from Howard Koolick - October 7, 1991
Sketch Plan -Wayne Holmberg
Kelsey Estates
Sketch Plan - Meadows of Round Lake
Official Magazine of Anoka Area Chamber of Commerce
Schedule of Bills
What's Happening
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT
AGENDA.
THANK YOU.
****************************************
~:::::::::::::::::::::::**************************************~:
;C;c '"
;C '"
;C;C ,.,.
;C;C ,."
;C;C ,."
;C ,."
~~ __,WH_AT'S_,JiAEP_ENING?_ ~~
;C;c **
;C;c ,."
;C;c ,.,.
;C;c ,.*
;C;c **
;C;c *,.
;C;c ,.*
;C;c October 15, 1991 ,.*
;C;c ,."
;C;c ,."
;C;c - The City has received from Group 28 attorney's **
:: the following information regarding the Waste ::
:: Disposal Engineering Site: ::
;C;c ,.*
:: 1) Administrative Order for Remedial Design and ::
;C;c Remedial Action, and ,."
;C;c **
;C;c **
;C;c 2) Appendixes A through C. ,."
;C;c ,."
;C;c ,."
:: This information is in my office if the ::
;C;c Council wishes to review the information. ,.,.
;C;c ,."
;C;c ,."
;C;c - The Metro Council on October 10, 1991 approved ,."
;C;c ,.*
;C;c the major ammendment to the Andover ,."
:: Comprehensive Plan for the Nedegaard Sewer ::
;C;c expansion into the CAB service area (the Hay and ,.*
:: Sonsteby property). ::
;C;c ,.,.
;C;c ,.*
;C;c - The public hearing for the draft Comprehensive ,."
;C;c Plan is at 7: 30 PM, October 22, 1991. The ,.,.
-MiC ...
;C;c Comprehensive Plan is to be on the November 5th ,."
;C;c meeting. ,."
;C;c ,."
;C;c ,."
:: - Ham Lake has started constructing the north end ::
;ciC of University Avenue at Constance Boulevard, ,."
;ciC **
;ciC see letter to a property owner in the front of ,."
:: the packet. The plan is to be completed with ::
iCiC the work by November 15th. ,."
;C;c ,.*
;C;c **
;C;c **
,;ciC **
;C;c ,."
;ciC ,.*
;ciC ,.*
;C;c .*
;C;c .*
1<;c **
;C;c *.
;c1< .*
1<1< **
1<;c **"
;C;c .*
;C;c .*
;C;c .,.
;C;c ,.*
1<;c ..
;ciC ..
;ciC *.
;ciC ..
;ciC ..
::***************************~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:
".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".~~
-r---o c c-
/oj5/r/
CITY OF HAM LAKE
155-U CENTRAL AVENUE N.E.
HAM LAKE. MINNESOTA 55304
434-9555
9'0--/1
il'\\ [:,' ['. If ij 7 {: ill"~
I. t' ",'" . - .-.' . ,'_
':_~...IJ ' . ."" .\ .~.- 1
Jlf-:~"..:--'::"']-9;~"l/ .'
-",~_.__." ..
CITY OF MIDOVf:R
October 1, 1991
Pat and Kathleen Dobrava
16120 University Ave. NW
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Dobrava:
The City of Ham Lake will be clearing trees from the right-
of-way for University Avenue NE south of Constance Blvd. NE
approximately 650 feet to the presently traveled road. This
road will then be stabilized with class 5 and opened for
traffic. We anticipate that this project will be completed
by November 15, 1991.
If you have any questions concerning this project, please
feel free to contact Brad Belair or me at the above listed
number.
Sincerely,
~~
Doris A. Nivala
Administrator/Clerk/Treasurer
cc: City of Andover
m
Minnesota Department of Health
Division of Environmental Health
925 Delaware Street Southeast
P,O, Box 59040
Minneapolis, MN 55459,0040
(612) 627,5100
Q; C/ I D ' /5,9 ,
~E-S
September 25, 1991
Andover City Council
c/o Vicki Volk, Clerk
City Hall
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
Andover, Minnesota 55304
Dear Council Members:
Enclosed are the results of analyses conducted on water samples collected on
June 17, 1991, from city Well No.2. The samples were analyzed for select
pesticides. No pesticides were detected in the samples. The sampling was
performed as part of the routine monitoring of your water supply conducted by
the Minnesota Department of Health.
If you have any questions regarding the analytical results, please contact me
at 612/627-5180.
Sincerely,
(~~-J~
Richard D. Clark, P.E., Supervisor
Public Water Supply Unit
Section of Water Supply
and Well Management
RDC:RHS:bs
Enclosure
cc: John Hines, Minnesota Department of Agriculture
Water Superintendent
An Equal Opportunity Employer
-
t'" ; en "" "" ~ '~ "" C'l < ~ ~< ~
g "" t'I S t'i I~ t'I 0 :z: 0 ~~
~ t'I en .~ en "" t'" t'" t'" t'" en Zt'"
C'l "'l I> "'l :: -< -< 0 > 0 ~~ - c..
" ... ... en l;g .... t!: C'l Z :><I "'l t'" - g.g
.. > C'l :><I .... 0 :: c: 0 .... .... ~~
... Z t'" .... 0 0 t'I .... ~ t'" 0 "" t'" Z C~) 1\1"
0 0 0 0 0 t'" :: t'I t'I t'lit'I ., ..
" ... en t'I ..., t'" t"I t'I to:! :><I t'I t'I ;q 0 ...
.... 1\1 > en en .... > z ~ ~~ "...' 0
01 :: 0 t'I Z :><I 0 c: > "
Z M ..., :: CI'l ~ >c en t'I :I vl ....
0 t'" t'" "'l > -< > t'" g~ III
... t'I Z 0 0 t'I t'I :><I Z ...
1\1 .... I~ :: :a 0 0 > .... 0 ~~ ....
.. :: "'l t'" CI'l :XO 0 .... 01
M 0 :a 0 = > .... CI'l t'" >en 1\1
c: 0 I~ :><I .... "'l 0 "'l 01 I 1\11 c.l nl C'l III
:><I en .... '~ .... +t'I
en t'I Z 0 :: ::: 0 :><I
Z > t'I I~ t'I :: 1\1
::; "'l Z :><I >0 ,Q ~~
t'I ;::: = t'" :><I C
:: 0 0 .... en oen 1\1 ~~
0 ~ :><I 0 0 en > 01
CI'l 0 .... ~ t'I Z ...
..., I~ 0 z .... "
:: - t'I CI'l >0 0
0 "" I; CI'l "'l CI'l "0
:a 0 t'I ...
0 = ~ Ic:; c.... ...
c: .. "" 0
en - CI'l ..., :: :I
~ :x 01
~ I- ~
'--
~ <:.:::'
.-'~
~
VI VI VI VI ~ VI I~ ~ VI ~ ..,. ;~ ~
'" ... VI .... 0 \0 N ... .... '" '" 'en
0 to' 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 ..,. l:tI .... ~VI ~ III
... 9
"0
~ \'J ...
1\1
~ t- l c
1\1
\ 01
n
r.. III .,
...
...... "7 "0
- ...
t ...
U,) 0
0 :I
e;
0
Cl' c..
~
~
~fo
<P n
l: b ,
~
~~Io~lt:~~':.' ,~..""~
0. Z
.. ..,.." C
9
Cl"
- 1\1 I
.,
0
0
:I
...
III
1\1 g ""~.
....1\1
"0"
1\1.
r','
r+
F~
,~4
I~,<
.-i:",.
"
0\0
::0'
0< C C en...
0 .. ..
... ,.. ... "'\0
... 1\1 1\1 00
1\1 ::0
n 0 ::
.... :a 0
1\1 1\1 ... ..,
c- n ... -<
1\1 1\1 \0
Cl" l- n ,...
'< < ,..
1\1 1\1 ,...
0\:) Co Co
t7v ') ()
1
5> -
~ -.l
~ ~ ,
.....
571.1
--
-. -" ~ .
MTNNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
CHEMICAL LABORATORY
Date
Reported: 8-01-91
PESTICIDES IN WATER (CONCENTRATION IN UG/L)
QUANTITATION
LIMIT 9113033
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alachlor
Atrazine
Butylate
Chlorpyrifos
Cyanazine
Diallate
EPTC
Fonofos
Linuron
Methyl Parathion
Metolachlor
Metribuzin
Phorate
Propachlor
Simazine
Trifluralin
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.02
< O.Ol
< 0.1
< 0.05
< 0.01
< O.Ol
< 0.5
< 0.01
< 0.1
< 0.05
< 0.05
< O.Ol
< 0.05
< 0.05
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
FIELD BLANK:
6-17-91
6-17-91
6-l9-9l
7-11-91
NONE
QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE
MATRIX:NONE
QUALITY CONTROL DUPLICATE
MATRIX: NONE
FOUND
UG
TRUE
UG
% REC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alachlor
Atrazine
Butylate
Chlorpyrifos
Cyanazine
Diallate
EPTC
Fonofos
Linuron
Methyl Parathion
Metolachlor
Metribuzin
Phorate
Propachlor
Simazine
Trifluralin
* "Less Than" value increased due to matrix interference.
"\
"\:>
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W, · ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor & City Council
COPIES TO: Departments
FROM: n" ,r; n n 1 "'grQ,.,
DATE:
Octnh"r 1 1 CJCJ 1
REFERENCE: SF.P'I'F.MRF.I? 1 qq 1 l?F.pnl?'I'
I hereby submit the following report of the BUilding Department for
the Month of September 1991:
BUILDING PERMITS
16 Residential (11 Sewer/5 Septic)
1 Addition
8 Garages
2 Pole BUildings/Barns
1 SWimming Pool
1 ChimneY/Stove/Fireplace
2 Structural Changes
5 Porches/Decks
1 Repair Fire Damage
1 Other
38
APPROXIMATE VALUATION
$ 1,370,000.00
9.792.00
58,160.00
23,50.0..00
2,500.00
1,800.00
5,400.00
16,604.00
15,000.00
500.00
$ 1,503,256.00
PERMITS
38 Building Permits
2 Curb Cut Permits
29 Heating Permits
2 Heating Repair
13 Hook Up (sewer)
21 Plumbing Permits
8 Plumbing Repair
98 Pumping Permits
7 Septic Permits
6 Septic Repair
11 Water Meter Permit
16 Certificates of Occupancy
9 Contractor's License
13 Sewer Admin. Fee
13 SAC Retainage Fee
FEES
$
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
Total
Total
Total
Total
BUILDING DEPARTMENT INCOME--September 1991 $
BUILDING DEPARTMENT INCOME--YTD 1991
VALUATION -- September 1991
VALUATION -- YTD 1991
Number of Houses YTD (1991) - 216
Number of Houses YTD (1990) - 218
Number of Houses 1990 - 269
Number of Houses 1989 - 341
COLLECTED
9,467.85
10.00
545.00
40.00
325.00
1,292.95
117.00
245.00
175.00
150.00
550.00
64.00
225.00
195.00
84.50
13,486.30
188,138.78
1,503,256.00
23,325,503.90
iJ~(.;tJ t2~'/U.IV
David Almgren, Building Official