HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC September 3, 1991
.~
,
~
DATE: September 3, 1991
ITEMS GIVEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL
"What's Happening"
Regular City Council Meeting Minutes - 8/20/91
Park & Recreation Minutes - 8/15/91
Tree Commission Meeting Minutes - 8/19/91
Ordinance 98 - Gambling Ordinance
Coon Creek Watershed Agenda - 8/26/91
Memo from Bob Peach re: Purchases from Fire Bond
Memo from Tom Durand, re: redistricting
Memo from Tom Durand re: Presidential Primary
Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization Minutes 7/17/91
Schedule of Bills
PLEASE ADDRESS THESE ITEMS AT THIS MEETING OR PUT THEM ON THE NEXT
AGENDA.
THANK YOU.
/__ J-
-.
'\
q/3Jq/
\
,
/
LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
JULY 17, 1991
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Jim Schrantz called the meeting to order at 8:30
a.m. in the Committee Room of Anoka City Hall.
ROLL CALL
Members present were Jim Schrantz, Scott Erickson, Steve
Jankowski (9:25 a.m.), and John Weaver.
Also present was Anoka alternate Ray Schultz and Andover
alternate Bruce Perry.
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
Motion was made by Weaver, seconded by Erickson, to APPROVE
THE JUNE 19, 1991, MEETING MINUTES AS PRINTED.
3 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
TREASURER'S REPORT
Erickson presented the Treasurer's Report for the month
ending June 30, 1991, which indicated a money market checking
account balance of $10.00; an interest bearing savings
account balance of $2,030.46; and a certificate of deposit
account balance of $6,000.00. Total balance as of June 30,
1991, was $8,040.46.
Erickson reported the first half year membership payment has
been received from the City of Ramsey. Erickson indicated we
will probably have to use money from the certificate of
deposit account to pay bills next month. He also indicated
he has sent out notices to all member cities requesting the
second half membership due payments.
Weaver queried the budget overages for
referenced the current budget report,
are pretty close to what was budgeted.
the budget followed. Weaver stated
headed for financial trouble.
the year. Erickson
indicating overall we
Further discussion on
he feared we may be
Motion was made by Erickson, seconded by Weaver, to APPROVE
THE JUNE 30, 1991, TREASURER'S REPORT AS PRESENTED.
"',
'--/'
3 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
July 17, 1991
Page 2
;
Consideration of the 1992 Budget
Erickson provided members with a rough draft of the new
valuations, received from the Anoka County Assessor's office,
which will determine each city's membership dues. Schrantz
recalled the valuations were determined by using the cities'
total value plus tax increment financing in order to put
everyone on an equal basis. The valuation percentages are:
Andover, 29.5 per cent; Anoka, 27.85 per cent; Ramsey, 42.05
per cent; and Coon Rapids, 0.6 per cent.
A final valuations copy will be provided at a future meeting.
Budget discussion followed. Schrantz indicated next year's
budget should include funds to cover lake monitoring
expenses.
Erickson reported he checked with the Six Cities Watershed
organization with regard to what they pay in liability
insurance and found it pays approximately $3,000 per year,
which includes coverage for its private consultants.
Schrantz reported LRRWMO information has been provided to
Risk Management for its evaluation and determination of costs
which would be incurred by this board in its purchase of
liability insurance. Although we await Risk Management's
response, Schrantz recommended this board budget a minimum of
$1,000 for insurance coverage. Weaver felt members of this
board should attempt to find a legislator to assist us in
allowing this board and its members to carry insurance
through their individual municipalities. Weaver concurred we
need to budget for the insurance, but added this board must
continue researching for adequate, affordable coverage.
Erickson concurred.
The 1992 budgeting process for each line item was discussed
and determined to be as follows:
ENGINEERING
Commission
$1,000.00;
$1,000.00;
Permit, $1,000.00; Administration, $800.00:
Meetings, $1,500.00; Surveys and Studies,
Management Plan, $1,000.00; and Miscellaneous,
for an Engineering total of $6,300.00.
(Jankowski arrived at 9:25 a.m.)
MISCELLANEOUS - Legal, $3,500.00; Audit and Bonding, $500.00;
Professional Services, $1,700.00; Postage, Copying, etc.,
$400.00; Newsletter, $1,000.00; Insurance, $3,000.00; Travel
and Annual Meeting, $200.00; and Contingencies, $1,000.00;
for a Miscellaneous total of $11,300.00; and a Grand Total of
$17,600.00.
,
. LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
July 17, 1991
Page 3
)
Members concurred the $3,000.00 for the Insurance line item,
if needed, should come from the 1991 $3,000.00 carry over,
with the remaining $14,600.00 to be budgeted out of member
city dues determined by the proper valuations.
Erickson presented a Summary
which is being used to keep
and expenditures.
of Permit Fee Applications form
track of permit review deposits
Upon discussion of monies to be budgeted for lake monitoring,
members concurred, because of budget constraints, this board
will have to try to get by with what the Anoka County Soil
and Water Conservation District is doing for us. However,
they concurred the first step is to educate the cities and
the public on the importance of water quality through a
newsle t ter.
The "Legal" line item included
Joint Powers Agreement.
the cost for updating the
'---
Members concurred a newsletter should be created and budgeted
for. Said newsletter shall consist of articles from the
LRRWMO members submitted to the Recording Secretary who will,
in turn, produce it in final form and provide copies to each
member city which will include it in the city's newsletter at
its own expense. Schrantz indicated he would prefer the
newsletter expense to be identified within the LRRWMO budget.
-----
indicated, reluctantly, we should distribute the total
to the municipalities and not further draw down on the
reserve. Erickson stated at the end of the year we
have approximately $3,000 in savings remaining.
!
\
\
Weaver
budge t
LRRTt7MO
should
Motion was made by Erickson, seconded by Weaver, to APPROVE
THE 1992 BUDGET AS PROPOSED.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Erickson indicated he will make the valuation changes and
send the information on to the member cities.
Weaver recommended LRRWMO members justify this proposed
budget to their City Councils by explaining our legal costs
in updating the Joint Pdwers Agreement, potential costs
incurred by future legislation, water quality, and the
reSUlting 509 Committee implementations.
o
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
July 17, 1991
Page 4
;:
Motion was made by Erickson,
that THE $3,000.00 BUDGETED
THE 1991 CARRY OVER FUNDS.
~~UNT SHALL REFLECT A GRA}ID
reluctantly seconded by Weaver,
FOR INSURANCE SHALL COME OUT OF
THEREFORE, THE 1992 BUDGETED
TOTAL OF $14,600.00.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
The Recording Secretary presented a resolution for considera-
tion which designates the official depository and signees.
Motion was made by Erickson, seconded by Weaver, to ADOPT
RESOLUTION NUMBER 91-1, DESIGNATION OF OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES
AND SIGNEES, DESIGNATING THE NORTHERN BANK AS THE OFFICIAL
DEPOSITORY FOR THE LOWER RUM RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
ORGANIZATION.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
REPORT OF OFFICERS None.
CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNICATIONS
Schrantz noted the July 16, 1991, facsimile he received from
Consulting Engineer Dean Skal1man addressing a recently
received public ditch inventory survey and his recommendation
thereof. Members concurred the board will work on this issue
further.
Schrantz
Bulletin
BOWSR .
noted an article in the League of Minnesota Cities
entitled Environment, Local Government Appeals to
The Recording Secretary raised several in-house issues to be
addressed:
The LRRWMO files show no alternate designated for the City
of Coon Rapids~
Files show no resolution received for either a voting
member or alternate from the City of Andover~
-- Upon review of the by-laws, it has been found packets can
be mailed out as late as four days prior to the meetings,
which may allow for additional information to be included.
Members concurred they prefer the current system of mailing
packets out ten days prior to the meeting dates.
. LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
July 17, 1991
Page 5
,
)
Article IV, Section 5 of the by-laws indicate fund dis-
bursement shall be by two signatures of officers, with one
being that of EITHER the Treasurer OR the Deputy Treasurer,
but not both. Members concurred the remaining signature
should be that of the Chairman.
PAYMENT OF BILLS
Erickson presented the following bills for payment:
-- City of Anoka (May 1991, $154.33; and June 1991, $174.00)
for adrninistration~ secretarial services, postage, copies,
etc.
-- Barr Engineering for the period April 28 through June 1,
1991, in the amount of $1,690.60. Erickson noted a brief
bill itemization was provided. Erickson noted approximately
$527.00 was chargeable to two project reviews, the Lord of
Life Church and the Kobs Addition. Schrantz expressed the
concern that many of the other expenses should be charged to
the permit applications. Schultz noted the billing seems to
include three hours of review on the Lord of Life Church
application, which he felt was high. Jankowski confirmed
that was a well presented plan. He also questioned that
amount of review time.
Weaver recommended this Barr Engineering
requesting further detail on meetings
The other members concurred.
bill be sent back
and administration.
Motion was made
AUTHORIZE PAYMENT
AMOUNT OF $154.33
by
OF
AND
Erickson, seconded by
THE TWO CITY OF ANOKA
$174.00.
Jankowski,
BILLS IN
to
THE
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
PENDING PROJECTS/PER~IT REVIEWS
Member City Quarterly Reports
Andover: A July 1, 1991, letter from Assistant City Engineer
Todd Haas was received identifying the Genthon Ponds project
in the City of Andover during the second quarter ending June
1991.
Anoka:
received
there was
A quarterly report form dated July 17, 1991, was
from Public Works Director Ray Schultz indicating
no activity during the second quarter 1991.
'-.J
--
LRRW110 Meeting Minutes
July 17, 1991
Page 6
.
Coon Rapids: Erickson reported there was no activity during
the second quarter; however, he will provide written confir-
mation of same.
Ramsey: Jankowski verbally
couple projects taking place
will provide a written report
indicated there have been a
during the second quarter, but
at the next meeting.
OLD BUSINESS
Seechi Disc Monitoring, Anoka County Soil and Water Conserva-
tion District versus that of the Metropolitan Council
Motion was made by Weaver, seconded by Schrantz, to CONTINUE
TO USE THE ANORA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
PROGRAM AS THE LRRWMO' S LAKE MONITORING AND SEECHI DISC DATA
SEEKING PROGRAM.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Joint Powers Insurance
Schrantz reiterated he is awaiting a response from Risk
Management on its evaluation and proposed cost for LRRWMO
liability insurance.
(Weaver left at 10:40 a.m.)
NEW BUSINESS
Metropolitan Public Ditch Inventory
Members again noted Skallman's July 16, 1991 facsimile
addressing the Metropolitan Public Ditch Inventory. They
concurred this survey was most probably the concern of Anoka
County, with an informational copy sent to the LRRWMO.
Jankowski agreed to check into this issue further and report
back at the August meeting.
LRRWMO Boundary Revision
Erickson reported he has received no response, with regard to
the need for an eastern boundary revision, from Coon Creek
Watershed Administrator~lm Kelley. Erickson's June 19,
1991, letter to Schrantz, with a copy sent to Tim Kelley, was
referenced. However, he hoped to have information available
by the August meeting.
~
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes
July 17, 1991
Page 7
)
Newsletter
Schrantz
carried
meeting.
indicated the "Newsletter" agenda item shall be
over for further discussion during the August
ADJOURNMENT
Motion was made by Erickson, seconded by Schultz, to ADJOURN
THE MEETING.
4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried.
Time of adjournment: 11:00 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
~
Mava Mikkonen
Recording Secretary
, "
I
':J
:J
% c.c,
~
AGENDA
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS
August 26, 1991
7:30 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Open Mike
POLICY ITEMS
4. Approval of Minutes
5. Notification of Proposed 1992 Levy
6. 1991 Lake Monitoring Program
7, Stream Maintenance Grant Application
PERMIT ITEMS
8. Variance Reqst: Building Addition (PAN 91-40)
9. Be Bop Retention Pond (PAN 91-43)
10. Olson Wildlife Pond (PAN 91-44)
DISCUSSION ITEMS
11, Intro Policy: Subwatershed Financing
12. Intro Policy: 429 Financing
13, Discussion 1992 Budget-Plan B
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
NEW BUSINESS
ADJOURN
~
COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS' MEETING
August 12, 1991
The Board of Managers of the Coon Creek Watershed District held
their regular meeting on August 12, 1991 at the Bunker Hills
Activities Center.
Present: Reggie Hemmes, Eldon Hentges, LuEllen Richmond, Paul
Williams.
Staff: Tim Kelly, Ed Mathiesen, Harold Sheff
1, The meeting was called to order at 7:31 PM
2. Approval of the Agenda: Moved by Williams, seconded by
Richmond. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
3, Open Mike: No one was present
Policy Items
4. Approval of June 24, 1991 Minutes: Approval of the minutes as
presented was moved by Richmond, seconded by Williams, Motion
carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and
Williams) and no nays.
5. Receive Monthly Financial Statements: Kelly presented the
monthly financial statements. Receipt of the financial
statements was moved by Williams, seconded by Richmond, Motion
carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and
Williams) and no nays.
6. Approval of Bills: Moved by Boyum, seconded by Richmond.
Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond,
and Williams) and no nays. The bills to be paid are as follows:
Check
3360
3361
3362
3363
3364
3365
3366
3367
3368
3369
3370
3371
3372
3373
3374
3375
3376
TO
Amount
7,647.68
4,075,15
3,256,24
1,623.75
1,400,00
561.62
400.00
368,77
319,17
300,00
300.00
235.44
150.00
93.09
54.32
31.36
24.68
JMM
Anoka County
Cypress Development
H, Sheff
Woodland
Blaine Office Part
Reggie Hemmes
LuEllen Richmond
COP
Bob Boyum
Eldon Hentges
T Kelly
Postmaster
ABC News
US West
Kinko's
APA
$20,841.27
7. Bids for Old Colony Pond: Kelly noted that bids were due by
noon August 7, 1991, and that four bids were received. Kelly
noted that the bids received listed from high to low were:
1. Park Construction $163,400; 2, Dresel Contracting $167,500;
3, Imperial Development $186,610; 4. Northdale Construction
$237,450. Kelly noted that the project bids were significantly
more than was anticipated and that a long term issue in project
organization involves the District's position of having to
financially react to the timing of a developer that does not
~
Page 2, Coon Creek Watershed District - August 12, 1991
~
coincide with the District's bUdgeting or cash reserves,
Mathiesen then explained some of the original goals of the
project and the variables in putting a project like this to bid.
The Board then discussed options for the timing and duration of
the project. Kelly then recommended that the Board reject all
bids and instruct staff to refine the project for bid in the
future. Staff recommendation was moved by Richmond, Seconded by
Williams. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays,
8. Bids for 1991 Brush Control: Kelly noted that bids were due
by 2:00 PM August 7, 1991, and that three bids were received.
Kelly noted that the bids received listed from high to low were:
1. Lake Restoration, Inc. $4,964; 2. Lake Management $6,990; 3.
Lake Improvement Consulting $7,849.50. Kelly recommended that
the Board select Lake Restoration, Inc. of Hamel, Minnesota, and
direct staff to execute the contract. Richmond moved the
recommendation. Seconded by Boyum. Hentges asked staff to
contact the county extension agent concerning the sensitively of
different plants to herbicides and the optimal time to treat
them. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Permit Items
9 Elwell Pond Construction (PAN 91-39): Mathiesen presented the
permit application noting that the applicant proposes to excavate
the pond over a five year period, and that the pond would drain
to ditch 44-7. Mathiesen recommended approval contingent on the
following: 1. An annual inspection and renewal of the permit; 2,
Erosion control be placed at 10 and 50 feet downstream of the
closest grading work and be maintained until the project is
complete; 3. An erosion control escrow of $500; 4. The District
will provide the design for the outlet and plan of operation.
Permit approval was moved by Hentges. Seconded by Williams.
Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond,
and Williams) and no nays.
Discussion Items
10, Proposal for Work on Ditch 57: Kelly presented a proposal
for conducting work on ditch 57 by October 1, 1991 citing five
issues: 1, To access the maintenance funds the Board needs to
adopt the 1990 inspection; 2. The City(ies) need to be
contacted; 3. City or Contract - the cities should be given
first option at conducting the work with the understanding that
the District wishes to commence work by October 1; 4, The
neighborhood(s) affected should be contacted and the project and
financing explained; 5, There will be a hearing required on this
project. Kelly then asked for Board direction on the geographic
scope of the project as either from TH 242 to 131st Street or
from Bunker Lake Boulevard to the golf course, Williams moved to
do the lower portion of the creek from TH 242 upstream. Seconded
by Hentges. Motion carried with five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes,
Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays,
o
11. Proposal for Work on Ditch 41: Kelly presented a proposal
for conducting work on ditch 41 by October 1, 1991 citing eight
issues that were raised at the July 22 meeting and that were
required to access the existing fund balance. Kelly noted that
his report was a follow up on the investigation the Board
requested in September, 1990 and that Ken Irvine, City of Blaine
had informed him that there was a 2 foot weir welded to the
downstream end of the culvert at 117th st, Kelly then
recommended that the Board direct staff to 1. Conduct a general
survey of the main ditch system by August 26 to evaluate the 89
~
Page 3, Coon Creek Watershed District - August 12, 1991
inspection; and 2, Survey a profile of the ditch from Jefferson
to TH 65 to quantify snd specifically locate the extent of the
problem. Moved by Hemmes, Seconded by Boyum, Williams
requested that staff further investigate possible long term
remedies to the culvert situation at TH 65. Motion carried with
five yeas (Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no
nays.
Informational Items
12. July Staff Report: Williams moved to receive the staff
report, Seconded by Boyum. Motion carried with five yeas
(Boyum, Hemmes, Hentges, Richmond, and Williams) and no nays,
The meeting adjourned at 9:23 PM on a motion by Boyum, seconded
by Richmond, Mot,ion carried with five yeas (Hemmes, Hentges,
Richmond, and Williams) and no nays.
Reginald A. Hemmes, President
o
, )
'--
.~
'. 't",,,
. ~..
CO U N TV
OF
IV CC,
14/1/
ANOKA
Office of I/'r COIOlly Board of Comm;ss;ollers
COURTHOUSE ANOKA,MINNESOTA55303 612-421,4760
August 23, 1991
MEMO TO: City ManagersfTownship Clerks
.c-~ _ p
FROM: Tom Durand, Division Manager, Governmental Services
SUBJECT:
Presidential Primary
As part of their 1992 Legislative proposals, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners is
considering supporting State funding of municipal and county costs for conducting the 1992
presidential primary. They would like input from Anoka County municipalities, indicating their
position on the issue of State funding and what they anticipate their municipal costs will be for
conducting the presidential primary.
Please let me know your thoughts on this issue.
TD:lp
'I
'-J
Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer
~"'.l
..~~
';;.
.'l~.",
CO U N TY
OF
1) cC.
'7/s/9/
ANOKA
Office of ti,e COllllly Board of Commissioners
COURTHOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612,421-4760
August 23, 1991
MEMO TO:
c~~srrownshiP Clerks
~
Tom urand, Division Manager, Governmental Services
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Redistricting Update
On August 21 st the Federal three Judge panel on redistricting began to move forward on the
Federal redistricting lawsuits. The Court established a January 20, 1992, deadline for the
Legislature to revise the redistricting bill that passed last session. They have, evidently, decided
not to wait until the State courts have ruled.
What this jurisdictional dispute means is that the timeline issues are even more unclear. In order
to address this problem. Hennepin County has decided to ask for an order in both the State and
Federal cases stavinq the requirement to redraw precincts. wards and county commissioner
districts until a final redistrictinq plan is established and the appeal period has expired.
TD:lp
cc: Anoka County Commissioners
Robert M.A. Johnson, County Attorney
Jay Mclinden, County Administrator
Brad Fields, Administrative Assistant
\
)
'~
Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer
~''''I
'~'i<"""""""""""~
.*;;;' -'t~
'~'"
;f\
Ji !;!
" '\\/
..J "-~~_ ,rfI''''
~""~i~-'<i!i'
~~ q \ 3\ q I
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
September 3, 1991
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BY:
Bob peach~
Bond Coordinator
BY:
ITEM
NO.
Purchase from Bond
The Appliance and Furniture Committee has reviewed the Council
recommendation on audio-visual equipment and has removed the
46-inch TV and replaced it with a 32-inch TV. With Council
approval, we wil I purchase the fol lowing equipment for the Fire
Stations:
Budoet
Cost
Purchase from AI I, Inc.:
Range, electric
Range, electric
Refrigerator
Refrigerator
Dishwasher
Washer
Washer
Drier, gas
Drier, gas
500
900
1,100
1,000
714
600
600
600
600
476
865
561
510
281
382
382
287
287
Purchase from Best Buy:
Microwave
Microwave
Television, 32"
Television. 26"
Television, 26"
VCR
VCR
VCP
Camcorder
740
740
2,300
380
380
350
350
o
900
159
159
1,500
520
520
300
300
159
839
TOTAL
12,754
8.487
MOTION BY
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
\
,~..J
)
****************************************************************
~~****************************************************i&-*****~*
~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
:: _,..WHAT'S,_._HAF!PENING?_ ::
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
:: * The Charter Commission has three members with ::
:: terms exiring on November 3, 1991. ::
~~ **
:: See attached list of members and the dates their ::
~~ te rms expi re . **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
:: * A reminder that on September 12 at 7:30 P.M. the ::
:: City Council has a joint meeting with the ::
~~ Comprehensive Plan Task Force. **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
:: * Frank and Howard will be on vacation next week ::
~~ and Howard until the 11th. **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ **
~~ *
~~***************************************************~********~*
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~
.
:-J
Andover Charter Commission
Chair
Jerry Windschi t1
3640 - 152nd Lane N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
421-9217
Term Expires 11/3/91
Vice-Chair
d'Arcy BO,se1l
2942 - 181st Avenue N.W.
Cedar, MN 55011
753-3085
Term expires 11/3/93
Commissioners
Lyle Bradley
15202 - 7th Avenue N.W,
Andover, MN 55304
421-1663
Term expires 11/3/93
Mike Knight
4622 - 175th Avenue N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
421-9247
Term expires 11/3/93
Bob Peach
15830 University Avenue N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
434-9358
Term expires 11/3/93
Gretchen Sabel
3540 - 153rd Avenue N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
427-5593
Term expires 11/3/91
Charles Veiman
13646 Crooked Lake Boulevard
Andover, MN 55304
757-2520
Term expires 11/3/91
'\
'-)
~-.J
C""~~
jJ:P ,- '~~"'\
f(]} . )
\i'~/
~~~"
7:30 P.M.
,,]
CITY of ANDOVER
Regular City Council Meeting-September 3, 1991
Call to Order
Resident Forum-Speakers are limited to 5 minutes
each with a maximum of 15 minutes.
Items that will require Council
discussion will be placed on the next
available agenda.
Agenda Approval
Approval of Minutes
Discussion Items
1. Special Use Permit/Diesel Storage Tank/13586
Thrush Street N.W.
2. Special Use Permit/Accessory Structure/17913
Aztec Street N.W.
3. Crosstown Boulevard Reconstruction
Staff, Committee, Commission
4. Approve Temporary Mobile Home Permit/16947
Verdin Street N.W.
5. 1992 Fee Schedule/Building Department
6. Award Bids/Misc. Equipment Sale
7. Adopt Resolution/Reimbursement Rules
8. Approve Change Orders/Fire Dept. Bond
;9. Utility Maintenance Person Replacement
Non-Discussion Items
10. Amend Water Ordinance
11. Award Bid/91-l0/159th Lane, Swallow, Quinn
12. Accept Petition, Order Feasibility/Northglen
Area
13. Schedule Joint Meeting with Park Commission
14. Remove stop Signs/Old Constance & university
15.
16. Accept Petition/Order Feasibility/Lund's
Evergreen Estates 2nd-4th Additions
17. Approve Change Order #5/Fire Station
Mayor/Council Input
Approval of Claims
Adjournment
~
"l.CAl"",,,,cm.,,c",,,,,,,,,,,,,
{'~i
, ~
~\ ..,~
~~ ,/~
'", . .I'
'-'''''
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 3, 1991
AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT :~Wt FOR
NO. Approval of Minutes
Admin.
ITEM Approval of Minutes V. Yolk ~,~,
NO, B/
BY:
.,.
The city Council is requested to approve the following minutes:
August 20, 1991 Regular Meeting (Jacobson absent)
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY SECOND BY
'-I TO
''''~..;'''''''''"~''''.,,''>''''
"~:y '\
~ ~
~J ~j
;ll,5
- '\).
) "
'-~ '.!j~
"""'-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ITEM
NO,
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning ~
September 3, 1991
SUP-M & S Drywall
Diesel Storage Tan BY:
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
AGENDA SECTION ,
NQ D1Scuss1on Items
The City Council is asked to review the Special Use Permit request
of M & S Drywall to allow for the installation of a 1,000 gallon
above ground diesel storage tank to be located at 13586 Thrush
Street NW, legally described as:
Lots 3 & 4, Block 2, Andover Commercial Park.
Planning & zoning Review
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their August 13, 1991
meeting recommended approval of the Special Use Permit with
conditions. Attached for your review is an excerpt of those
minutes which reflect those conditions.
Applicable Ordinances
Ordinance No.8, Section 4.26 establishes the requirement of
obtaining a Special Use Permit for all uses associated with the
bulk storage of oil, gasoline, liquid fertilizer, chemicals and
similar liquids. The purpose of requiring the Special Use Permit
is to give the City some assurance that fire, explosion or water
or soil contamination hazards are not present that would be
detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare.
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the issuance of a Special
Use Permit, outlining conditions and procedures.
Attached is a proposed Resolution for your review and adoption,
the Staff Report and minutes from the August 13, 1991 Planning and
zoning Commission meeting
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
j TO
SECOND BY
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
"
'-)
RES. NO. R
-91
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF M & S
DRYWALL TO LOCATE 1,000 GALLON ABOVE GROUND DIESEL STORAGE TANK ON
THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS 13586 THRUSH STREET NW AND LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS LOT 3 & 4, BLOCK 2, ANDOVER COMMERCIAL PARK.
WHEREAS, M & S Drywall has requested a Special Use Permit
for a 1,000 gallon above ground diesel storage tank on the
property described as 13586 Thrush Street NW, legally described
as:
Lots 3 & 4, Block 2, Andover Commercial Park
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has reviewed the
request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of
Ordinance 8, Section 5.03 and 4.26; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no
opposition regarding said request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission to allow for a 1,000 gallon above
ground diesel storage tank on said property, with the following
conditions:
1. The applicant shall provide to the City, in writing,
proof that the tank meets all State requirements and
regulations.
2. The Special Use permit will be subject to a one (1)
year sunset clause as defined in Ordinance No.8,
Section 5.03(0).
3. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual
review.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
3rd day of September, 1991
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Victorla Volk, City Clerk
"
~~
/ ')
'-.../
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST F,ORPLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
August 13, 199~
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planning
BY:
David L. Carlberg
City Planner
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA
BV, J.t
AGENDA ITEM
4. M & S Drywall
Special Use Permit
Gas storage Tanks
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the
Special Use Permit requested by M & S Drywall to locate an above
ground 1,000 gallon diesel storage tank on the following described
property:
Lots 3 & 4, Block 2, Andover Commercial Park
13586 Thrush Street NW (PIN 34-32-24-32-0015 & 0016)
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Section 4.26 of Ordinance No.8 establishes the criteria for a
Special Use Permit for all uses associated with the bulk storage
'of oil, gasoline, liquid fertilizer, chemicals and similar
liquids. By requiring a Special Use Permit, the City has some
assurance that fire, explosion or water or soil contamination
hazards are not present that would be detrimental to the public
health, safety and general welfare.
Ordinance 8, 'SectCion 5.03 regulates the Special Use Permit,
outlining conditions and procedures.
GENERAL REVIEW
Staff is concerned with the placement of the storage tank. The
close proximity of the tank to parking areas may cause a safety
hazard. However, Joyce Noyes, Andover Fire Marshal, has
reviewed the installation plans and has approved the diesel
tank as long as it is installed per State guidelines. (See
attached letter dated July 11, 1991). The State requires the tank
to be located at least five (5) feet from any structure and at
least t~n (10) feet from the property line. The attached diagram
shows the placement of the tank. The tank will also be surrounded
by concrete filled posts to protect the tank from accidental
contact from automobiles.
'-
Page Two
Special Use Permit - M & S Drywall
August 13, 1991
~J
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Special Use Permit requested by M & S
Drywall for an above ground 1,000 gallon diesel storage tank be
approved with the following condition:
1. The applicant provide to the City, in writing, proof that the
tank meets all State requirements and regulations.
o
,
I :
I
,-- )
'+
.\,
\<l
()
(l
()
If.
. I ~
I
N
,'V'l
I
,
I,
I ~:
~:
"
I
,
,
,
.
,
~ ::
~. :
C\J ':,
~ ":
,
,
,
.
.
,
........
l
'-
. ,
\ ,
. ,
. '-
.
.
,
"
d
~
CD
\~ ~
..
"
....""..
".,~.,
,......
~
:0::
W~
~~
Z
='
:CD
ZI:h-'
pEl""'"
"N....-r
~ r. ~
~~
1;:)'"
~~
~~ .. R',,"'l'
c:.
"tI)
:
~
"
I;
lE
~ ---{
- - I:
, ,
. Ii
.-
~
. ~
, .
'.
0;::- .
..::, ,
,
,
,..-""
, .
. ,
. ,
, .
. .
! '
.
,
,
. .,~.,. ~~.
'--
~
_...r"."....
~ __..,z,-n" --
~
l
....
~
~~
i'
~
'-
l
~
.~ I
~.~..I ...:
.'
,~
;!tl~
~"
".
"
~
"M~~
", .'
,,.- -.
,
"
~
",_~..,
,
I
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
.
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
I
.
,
~
.
.
,
,
I
l. r I
, \ ,
~ ... , i,~
~ , .
. .
. ,
, ~ '......' ,
/
'"
,
.
.
.
,
~
~,
,
,
I
,
.
.
,
,
,
.
,
.
,
,
\
\
"
~I
,
,
~
.
\
.
,
.
,
,
,
,
.
,;...,
#'~
.
.....-.....
~ ~:
~ ~ ~
... -;0.
~ ~
~ ~
... '" 'i'
"- ~
\::~~ t:
~ ,,~~ "
....~~~ ...
"
~. ~p~
:l.
.
,
,
,
".
~
_...-,,~
'N\N
..Hi"
.~ It.
\i
-::::"l>
~,,,, ."'~
,,- ~ ~
C ~
"
'"
~"
!J~
,,"i
~
~"
"l,
-:::-.
~~
,,~-
..~/'
.
t" ~~
~ ~~
~
...
'il
~
";;\~
'"''
'-c:l
"L
...
...
~..
~/
.~6'
'" nr
......,~/ ,J"?;' "I.#4"A~
@
.-.. ....:
. I
"J
(-.
~~
:: '.
0.0
"
": ~
:~
.,
':~
Ii:
u
! ;'~
I
i i ;f:
rt
I
M & S DRYWALL SUPPLY
6127217090
P.01
"
/'
/~
~
~j
i if~~ ,.,' '~,~. ~.
5 SLw~- N\~~'
, ,e,.;<",
I
/
,
I
,
,
/
~
.
/
,
,
,
/
I
I
!
.
._~:~ \.
--
"'I'cc:
~~ .....-.-
~~..
ft~-
/) :',
...
.........'..-.IIG.~
\ '0=----.
;1 .. <i' ' 'u...
. - I .,."", ~'7"
"b . .,~
~ ~ .~~~ "'~\)"
d ~ ~~l
~ 0' \ --~l ;t's..~
"g ~'-.,. --~---,--
~ tit FA I;'. ~
G'l -.
~ ~V:'I'~ i
, ~ .. ;:
~~
:' ..!: '
? i ~
, /....
i
....
!
"
, ":""
. ,~...'
\./f
'-
~~' .~
. -
---'Ie".4('_...
--- - -----
, <L. '~""""I ~.
c.:,-==-
__u
"_0_-
--,-.-..---...-... . .........-.-.
l-~-~--- "',-.,
y&W<., ~r l~
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOUL.IVARD N,W, . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304 · (612) 755-5100
..........
o
"
S'~~IAL USE PERMIT
.100..
property Address
/3SBCt,
~',l"c.j, ~ Sf:
/<.10
Legal Description 0; property:
(Fill in whichever is apPQ~p'riate):
Lot 3 Block .~ Addition IInd4vt/ r:./lA.rIA.L"ci~1 ~("'"
..,.
plat Parcel PIN
(If metes and bounds,'8ttach the complete legal)
-..v'Y.
**************************-.t!***************************************
, -
Reason for Request
/ (yn
,
,-
Section of Ordinance ~ ~b
. )
~c".3
.~u'rent zoning
("TY o=- !\~II:'Q\1sR
c.~
**************************~,...***************************************
Address
~"'1 u C:;o
=t :~~:- \I <> ~"\'f\ .~,,~ .,: ::~:]; ~ ~~ >:~:",'l
.". .-..... . .
Name of Applicant
H~me Phone . bl~ '~o:;q _~";).,q_pusiness Phone (Q\~ ~o.n I"ICQ'290.
Signa ture "'~C'.. OA.... Q &~~:~'~~"'( Date -.!\ - \\ J:\ \
**************************~,~~***************************************
property Owner (Fee Owner)
-( If different from above) -
'.
Address - ,
Home Phone
r
pusiness phone
'\
\.J
Signature
Date
"
. .
**:* * * * * * * *.*'.* ** * * * * *** * * * **'* ..'* ** * * * ** * * * *'It'* * * * *** *.* * '* **. ** * * * * * * * * * * *
.. p .
-
-
. .
.-.=.,;....:...--.-.....-.-...... .-'--.'- -----~.~-=~:':'--::-~~:- ~ :.
.---.--
. . -- - .
. ,I
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PAGE 2
:~
Attach a scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrQw~ dimensions of the property and
structures~ front, side and rear yard building setbacks~ adjacent
streets~ and location and use of existing structures within 100 feet.
The names and addresses of at~ property owners within 350 feet of the
subject property must also b, provided.
'~pplication Fee: $150.00
J(Filing Fee: $10.00
Date pzt~d
$Su.ud
7/;'1/9/
I
Jj /60dJ~
Receipt i "'- l ~7 9--v
Amended 3~~~1~l U5e ~erml~ laa;
CRITERIA FOR GPANTING SPECIAL USE PERMITS
In granting a special use permit, the City Council shall consider the
advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and:
the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals
and general welfare of o~cupants of surrounding lands,
existing and anticipate4 traffic conditions including parking
facilities o~ adjacent ~treets and lands,
the effect on values ot propetty and scenic views in the
surrounding area, and ~ .
the e~fect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan.
""
o
'-
.-
\lo-..._____ .
...s..... '~":""';".:A:OO>J;.~:n1~.,I'~",~
~..........
_.--..-............~-,_..--_.
~ "ANDOVER FIRE DEPARTMENT
~ . FIRE MARSHAL DIVISION'
o ~~/ 1785 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W.
~ ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
. '" ..
July 11, 1991
Dave Carlburg
Andover City Hall
1685 Crosstown Blvd. N.W.
Andover, MN 55304
RE: M & 5 Drywall
As per the plans from the meeting of July 11, 1991, the diesel
tank may be installed per state guidelines.
Fire Marshal
Joyce Noyes
I' .:
~)
. ..
, "-
v
: )
~~
~
~
CITY of ANDOVER
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, August 13, 1991 at tq~ Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the Special Use
Permit request of M & S Drywall Supply to locate an above ground
1,000 gallon diesel storage ~ank located at 13586 Thrush Street
NW, legally described as Lots 3"& 4, Block 2, Andover Commercial
Park fPIN 34-32-24-32-0015 & 0016).
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
A copy of the application and location will be available at
Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
UA-/~.
V1ctor1a Vo , C1ty Clerk
Publication dates: August 2, 1991
August 9, 1991
~~-~~-~~-~~-uvuo
M. R. Olson
2220 - 127th Ln NW
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
34 32 24 32 0010
'~rothy Sonterre
,_.-356 Bunker Lake Blvd NW
Andover, MN 55304
.' ')
'~-j
~q-j~~4-j~-U009
Renner Arent Properties
2387 - 136th Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
34 32 24 32 0013
Reneo Contruetion Co.
2384 - 136th Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
34 32 24 32 0009
Riccar Heating & Air
Conditioning
2387 - 136th Ave NW
Andover, MN 55304
34 32 24 32 0018
Agrichem Inc.
13345 NE Jefferson St
Ham Lake, MN 55304
:-J
."~'!~""""'~'''''''>\''
,J.i' ~'..
!,~
J;:! '1\
:i1 .~
'~;, "
\" ,-0
.,.~
"!.~
~~.~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 3, 1991
BY:
ITEM
NO,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ~
Planning
David L. Carl er
City Planner
AGENDA SECTION,
NO, D1Scusslon Items
BY:
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to review the Special Use Permit request
of Greg Smedsrud to construct an accessory structure prior to
the construction of a principal structure on the property located
at 17913 Aztec Street NW, legally described as Lot 7, Block 2,
Cedar Hills River Estates Second Addition.
Note: The applicant has no intentions of constructing a principal
structure on the above indicated property.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the Special Use Permit
Process.
Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05, regulates accessory structures
within the City of Andover. Consult the attached report presented
to the Planning & Zoning Commission on August 13, 1991 for further
background information.
In granting a Special Use Permit, the City Council shall examine
the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and
general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
Planning & Zoning Review & Recommendation
The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their August 13, 1991
meeting, recommended approval of the Special Use Permit with
conditions. Attached for your review are the minutes from the
meeting which reflect those concerns and conditions.
Attached is a proposed resolution for your review and adoption.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
----'"
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO. R -91
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST OF GREG
SMEDSRUD TO CONSTRUCT AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE PRIOR TO THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT
17913 AZTEC STREET NW, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 7, BLOCK 2, CEDAR
HILLS RIVER ESTATES SECOND ADDITION.
WHEREAS, Greg Smedsrud has requested a Special Use Permit
to construct an accessory structure prior to the construction of a
principal structure on the property located at 17913 Aztec Street
NW, legally described as Lot 7, Block 2, Cedar Hills River Estates
Second Addition.
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has reviewed the
request and has determined that said request meets the criteria of
Ordinance 8, Sections 4.05 and 5.03; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the
proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and there was no
opposition regarding said request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to
the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Andover hereby agrees with the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission to allow Greg Smedsrud to construct
an accessory structure prior to the construction of a principal
structure on said property, with the following conditions:
1. The Special Use Permit will be subject to annual
review and site inspection.
2. The Special Use permit be subject to a one (1) year
sunset clause as defined in Ordinance No.8, Section
5.03(D).
3. The applicant shall place the structure in accordance
with the minimum setback requirements of the
designated zoning district.
4. The applicant shall place the structure so as to
accommodate the future placement and construction of a
principal building.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover on this
3rd day of September, 1991
~
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel, Mayor
Victoria Volk, City Clerk
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST F.OR :PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
~
DATE
ang"c!~
, ~
.
'991
AGENDA ITEM
5. P.H. - SUP
Accessory Structure
17913 Aztec Street NW
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED FOR
AGE~
BY:
Planning
BY' David L. Carlberg
. ,.~+-,. "'",.,,.,~
REQUEST
The Andover Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review the
Special Use Permit requested by Greg Smedsiud to construct an
accessory structure prior to the construction of a principal
structure on the following described property:
Lot 7, Block 2, Cedar Hills River Estates Second Addition
(17913 Aztec Street NW)
The lot to be constructed upon is a 1.75 acre lot and is zoned
R-2, Single Family Estate.
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05 states that, "No accessory building
or use shall be constructed or developed on a lot prior to the
time of construction of the principal building except by Special
Use Permit".
Section 4.05 also states that, "No permanent sheet metal, painted
or unpainted accessory building, except small garden sheds not
exceeding one hu~dred twenty (120) sq. ft., shall be allowed on
parcels of three (3 a.) acres or less in all residential
districts...".
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03 regulates the Special Use Permit
process.
In granting a Special Use Permit, the following criteria shall be
examined.
I
o
1. The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals
and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
The construction of the accessory structure prior to the
construction of a principle structure would not have a detrimental
effect. The accessory structure is intended to be used for
storage purposes.
2. The existing and anticipated traffic conditions including
parking facilities on adjacent streets and land.
The proposed use would have no significant negative impact on
traffic and parking conditions in the area.
Page Two
SUP - Accessory Structure (17913 Aztec Street NW)
August 13, 1991
.:J
3. The effect on the values of property and scenic views in the
surrounding area.
The proposed use would have no significant negative effect on
the property values and scenic views in the area. The
proposed accessory structure will also be screened from
automotive and pedestrian view.
4. The effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive plan
The use would have no negative effect on the Comprehensive Plan.
GENERAL REVIEW
The applicant has received approval from Lary Carlson, Woodland
Development Corporation to construct the accessory at the location
on the attached maps. Attached is a letter from Mr. Carlson
giving his approval as well as some conditions to be adhered to by
Mr. Smedsrud.
The applicant has stated that the structure is to be used for
storage purposes and also possibly horses. In order for the
applicant to have horses on the property, he must replat the lot
with the lot to the north. Ordinance 23 requires a minimum of 2.5
acres to have horses. When replated, the lot would consist of 3.5
acres.
COMMISSION OPTIONS
1. The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve the Special Use
Permit requested by Greg Smedsrud to allow for the construction of
an accessory structure prior to the construction of a principal
building to be located at 17913 Aztec Street NW (Lot 7, Block 2,
Cedar Hills River Estates Second Addition).
The Commission finds the request meets the criteria established in
Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03, including: the use will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of
the community; the use will not cause serious traffic congestions
or hazards; the use will not depreciate the surrounding property
and the use is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. The
Commission also finds that the use meets the provisions
specified in Ordinance No.8, Section 4.05, Accessory Structures.
2. The Planning and Zoning Commission may deny the Special Use
Permit requested by Greg Smedsrud to allow for the construction of
an accessory structure prior to the construction of a principal
building to be located at 17913 Aztec Street NW (Lot 7, Block 2,
Cedar Hills River Estates Second Addition).
I
<J
.. .~_......-_._~___..............__.__ _~._ '-'~__L___ _._.-..._._._____-_. _____~_ __..__._...___~_~_._~ ___.-,-.~_,._--,_._
(
\
, )
Page Three
SUP - Accessory Structure (17913 Aztec Street .NW)
August 13, 1991
The Commission finds the request does ,not meet the criteria
established in Ordinance No.8, Section 5.03. In denying the
request, the Commission shall state those reasons for doing so.
3. The Planning and Zoning Commission may table the item.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Option # 1 with the following conditions:
1. The applicant place the structure in accordance with the
minimum setback requirements of the designated zoning
district. -
2. The applicant place the structure so as to accommodate the
future placement and construction of a principal building.
~
~
(,.-
\
-:..............
.-.. . _.::;.:~.. -~. - ... .:.
;-~:- :.;..-
.'"-.. .-
. ., :~-: ~l:.;;~=;:~~~~~i:~~t:!':
,-,..'''..... .-_~_:,:.._:~.--'._-,.,..~_.. ,.... ~ . .
- ...; .::.. .;.:.--::.'
_ ., # .:: ~:. ~:.;;;;;~-
.. ; "t.~~1~,~_~;;~':' .. .
_. ...
.,
--....,.
. ... ..
:J
.....
I:
.r&.O. ?d
, ,
. .
....,.
10,
, ,
'.
.
~.
.....
'<\~
~
(
. ..o...l
,'/ -----.
.'....-
,,:;)' ':.
/.~;; ~
..... 03
t'\
.~
~
~~
~
, //1.,' f'/'/"'.<tiIJ'L
"-
~ ~
'-'- ~
~
~ ~
~ ~" \
.s.; \
~: \
.
\
~~ ...
~
"\0. .'
~,
r-..... ,.....'
~..
s:s ~~
'" ""'. :.
~~
~~
<:
ZtI"
...
r
I
'<\
/.r#l'.t:.3
"'.Jrc"~J
T
\
\
"
'-)
,
~
,.
~ ~ \:~
.' \ .
\J
..,
)
/ "ry...fr)" S ~o
Iq, !!? [;f 07-0< 0./,3'
/ ~ [5 ~ ~ ~"
't1o. ..!J.. e
/~ v
}o..... I (J'
_. ..
;Cr..,
V"" ....I'r)
,.,., "
cv o~
flJ
cv
~
J........ .
CrJ
~
u'
I _
r.. , -(,0
I..A..I . C'J
, , ~--
- ,""-
C\J~
N I -;;
q r <J ,
'~-
1<) - ?;:
rf' '. .
- -
L
<J
,ag~n
.-, l)O
s ~OO'
6?o
/8'
< ?'7t-
~
5
~.BI <=too
401,10'
S 78J45' IS'tE
6
.:2 ~ 900
416.71
N 890 40' 27 E;,
; I r: "'0
, r,...: 7 0
J "w N
~ ~- .~~ ~~.~oo
~;6' I _ _ I~ _ ~Q9'- 1 _ _ _
· ~--=-- ~ = 433'- 17.8 ,TH~
'\
J
, "
J\: 7058 57
" . t
~
-
..
^'1
.. ,.,.,
(0..
0').....
tb v-
a 0
CD~
'"
. .
,
~ 1
o
to
~
.
"
- Ol
NN
w.
0;;:;
!J"'lo
'1'1') v
en
I
-- - --
LANE' N.W.
5'
PARA
.~
"
.,
J. La tterell
17922 Aztec street ffii
Andover, MN 55304
August 13, 1991
City Of Andover
County Of Anoka
~'State of Minnesota
To whom it may concern:
Regarding the Special Use Permit request of Greg Smedsrud to allow for
the constructi6n of an accessory structure prior to the construction of
a principle structure on Lot 7, Block 2, Cedar Hills River Estates 3C~
Second Addition:
. I welcome the opporluni ty to leave the lot in a mOr'e natural state in
the near term,
. I believe the planned activity for the lot adds ;talue to our neigh-
borhood,
. Maintaining Greg as a member of the Andover community and a member of
our neighborhood adds value .': )Greg is a model citizen and an important
member of the Andover community. It would be a shame to lose him.
/,~/'-_.. ~~'/".'
- ----<-.. -
. " -
~hn S. Latterell"
o
July 26, 1991
The Honorable Kenneth Orttel, Mayor of Andover
Honorable City Council Members
CITY OF ANDOVER
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
Andover, Minnesota 55304
RE: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION BY
GREG SMEDSRUD, 17940 AZTEC STREET N.W., ANDOVER
Dear Mayor Orttel and Council Members:
Mr. Smedsrud contacted our office several months ago regarding the
purchase of property from us for the purposes outlined in his special
use permit application. At that time, I discussed a variety of
issues with Mr. Smedsrud, including the following:
- The need to seek specific approval from the city for his intended
use.
- Regardless of the city's actions, we would require 100% approval
from all families living in the immediate area.
We required specific information on the building size, design,
structure, usag~, and placement.
'.
- We had to be assured that the building would be placed within
the existing treed area in order to remain compatible with the
uses of the adjacent property.
- We requested a specific commitment from Mr. Smedsrud regarding
type and location of the perimeter fencing.
Mr. Smedsrud has indicated that he has received approval from 100%
of the neighbors and, further, has submitted that list to both our
office and to the city. He has also satisfied us relative to the
concerns we raised regarding the building and the fencing. Therefore,
assuming the special use permit does, in fact, limit the number
of animals to be kept on the property to that requested by Mr. Smedsrud
(I believe it is two horses) and, further, providing that Mr. Smedsrud
is required to keep the property neat, clean and generally free
of barnyard-type odors, then we have no objection whatsoever to
your granting him a special use permit as requested.
'.
.~,J
830 West Main Street
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
(612) 427-7500
FAX: (612) 427-0192
Mayor Orttel and Council Members
July 26, 1991
Page Two
, , If I have not answered specific concerns which have been raised
'-J by the city, I would be glad to do so. Thank you.
kds
cc: Byron Westlund, Vice President - Develop~ent, Woodland Development
Corporation
Greg Smedsrud
'\
"~
(j
July 8, 1991
To Whom I t May Concern:
..-
The application and materials enclosed are submitted for the city's
approval of a special use permit for Greg Smedsrud at 17940 Aztec St NW,
Andover, The special use permit is for a outbuilding on Lot 7 of Cedar
Hills River Estates, Second Addition, I have received the permission of
adjoining lot owners for this structure and will conform with the setback
and building guidelines of the city, The following enclosures are for your
information
- application for special use permit
- scaled drawing
- adjoining property.owners permission and addresses
- building plans
Sincerely,
JtJ~
Greg Smedsrud
\
,~
o
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N.W. . ANDOVER. MINNESOTA 55304. (612) 755-5100
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
Property Address
Ii q /3
JJ-z.~ -5-h
/lw
Legal Description of Property:
(Fill in whichever is apporpriate):
Lot '+ 7 Block .;;L
Plat Parcel
(If metes and bounds,
Addi tion C~<l.., H;J/j I?,;.,.. (11",1"(',
L..4r~- (JS"3;;1~~;:;L.;loOj1
PIN L..t 7- ~.;'- "~'lo.3aaQ~
attach the complete egal)
f......,J AJcJ",t'J:"
*********************************************************************
Reason for Request Ie ert'<.t "'-1'bvdcl"1I.1 Sh...c.:+urflo fO'" pl'lI/o..tc:' v.,~ 0(\
.
fur "1. ~i'r:J'+urc 10).,11 I.,~ ~;."'J..... fr,)...., l"'1';I,l-,h<l"~ ,11~w a;"<l wd\ \....-.L ,-.;..
<:; U~II.J-1 l""\4to?/"'''\J ""<1 bl<<!,., ~ in l.U{ 1-/0.. fI.? ,,:;,,t,,''''hAOd a.fL"+""'''1~1. Cwr'.lU'
Of our J.,,J;'clf;""l~ f'''.1~J<,.,(~ is d;r~..I-I; ~(ac..I -1"/'.:>, <f-ree.t.
Section of Ordinance
4,o~
Current Zoning R-?
*********************************************************************
Name of Applicant ~r~l Smed!r~J
Address II) q C{a A-2.tc"~ 'Sf- N, IV. Pr"Jdl~r
Home Phone i$1-S6f:b Business Phone
Signature ~ )\~-..~
~q-1111
Date l-iJ~1
*********************************************************************
Property Owner (Fee Owner)
(If different from above)
Address -- '
,..
\
~
Home Phone
Business Phone
Signature
Date
~
-* ** * * * * ** ** * *~ * *,.; ~ ** * * * * ~ * * * * * ** * *-* * * * * *.*;.. * * * * * * * * ** - * * * * *.* * * **,* * * * *
~
, '\
'0
'\ .-
~..
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
l:-AGE :2
Attach a scaled drawing of the property and structures affected
showing: scale and north arrow; dimensions of the property and
structures; front, side and rear yard building setbacks; adjacent
streets; and location and use of existing structures within 100 feet.
The names and addresses of all property owners within 350 feet of the
subject property must also be provided.
Application Fee~o.oo~
Filing Fee era on ~
Amended Special Use Permit Fee:
$50.00
S/Vq L-
Receipt # ..::IF~q7 ()
Date Paid
CRITERIA FOR GRANTING SPECIAL USE PERMITS
In granting a special use permit, the City Council shall consider the
advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and:
the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals
and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands,
existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking
facilities on adjacent streets and lands,
the effect on values of property and scenic views in the
surrounding area, and
the effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan.
'"
'0
To: WoodLand Development
Fr: Greg Smedsrud
ThiS map and letter is in regards to our conversation about constucting a
outbuilding on lot 7 at the corner of Aztec and 178th street in Andover.
The map details the approximate location of the; building on the lot and
shows the visibility of the building from the the other homes located on
the street. The building will be used for storage and will have colored
walls, roof, and trim to match. The use of the building is intended for
storage and stabling of two horses,
Thank You,/0
I~.l,:~~
(Greg Smedsrud
112-"2 TIE(.. "5"(..;).,J ,
~4~~ Ur~~~f
I:r? (;10 A 1:f6" c f r V',,-,," ~
A..., 2) (/.,..c:....,. "'4
,... ,
~/A~/ ~d#~SU~
/ f~ ~ ~ j}~/C: c:: 5T))vJ
;}"'OKA.,' AI..)
,,] .-flO/la;!J1 o(.L1f!1JJ. ~
/7~58' Clzlec Sf.lj~;j
CC/Jr! t11/eA1 II? AJ 5S"3O<f-
C)
'\
'-J
((])~
~
CITY of ANDOVER
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Andover will
hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as can
be heard, on Tuesday, August 13, 1991 at the Andover City Hall,
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW, Andover, MN to review the Special Use
Permit request of Greg Smedsrud to allow for the construction of
an accessory structure prior to the construction of a principle
structure on the property located at 17913 Aztec Street NW (Lot 7,
Block 2, Cedar Hills River Estates Second Addition).
All written and verbal comments will be received at that time and
location.
A copy of the application and location will be available at
the Andover City Hall for review prior to said meeting.
I~~
Vlc!orla Vol , Clty Clerk
Publication 'dates: August 2, 1991
August 9, 1991
John & Rebecca Latterell
17922 Aztec st NW
Andover, MN 55304
(-~Jry & Nancy Leegard
\~_'7958 Aztec st NW
Andover, MN 55304
,J
Daniel & Virginia parent
17900 Aztec St NW
Andover, MN 55304
Woodland Development
Attn: Larry Carlson
830 West Main St
Anoka, MN 55303
Brian & Melanie Johnson
18006 Aztec St NW
Andover, MN 55304
13ru,Ge- L;~c:I bu-q
OeeYfl)ot J
17822 Aztec St NW
Andover, MN 55304
.,,~,r ~P-'~~"''''\"
ji' ';'\
[~J \~
~ M
~~i~
if,.
CITY OF ANDOVER
,-' -'\
,_.J
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE September 3, 1991
Engineering
APP ~VEt> FOR
AGE ~[~A~
.j~
/
AGENDAOSECTION. It
NO. lSCUSSlon ems
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
....3 ,
Crosstown Blvd.
Reconstruction
--\1*
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to reconsider the construction of
Crosstown Boulevard from Nightingale street to Hanson Boulevard.
At the meeting of August 6, 1991 the Council agreed the road
should be improved to a rural standard unless State Aid's funds
will pay for this.
This stretch of road is designated as a Municipal State Aid. The
curb and gutter would most likely be 100% eligible. The amount
of storm sewer to be eligible usually is not determined until the
plans are submitted to state Aid for their review and approval.
MOTION BY
- "-
.~_/ TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
~'a;:;l-' . Y".
..IL.:' , 1.__. _~~
>,'
Regula~ City Council Meeting
Minutes - August 6. 1991
Page 9
:,)
<Kelsey Estates DIscussion. Continued)
M~. Sch~antz stated the p~oposal was gene~ated at the Staff level to
have two mo~e assessable pa~cels on 152nd Ci~cle. The maste~ plan
p~esented-this evening or Kelsey-Round Lake Pa~k shows the a~ea as
pa~kland, but It is not. One pa~cel is owned by M~. Windschitl and is
buildable; the othe~ p~oposed pa~cel is owned by M~. Bachman. The
benefit to the City Is the addition of two assessable pa~cels plus the
~eceipt of $9.600 which can be used fo~ pa~k development pu~poses.
Council dl~ected the matte~ to the Pa~k and Rec~eation Commission fo~
thel~ conside~ation and ~ecommendatlon.
-
~ CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD/RURAL OR URBAN
CouncIl discussed the county's ~equest of a ~u~al o~ u~ban st~eet
standa~d on C~osstown Bouleva~d between Andove~ and Hanson Bouleva~ds.
It was noted a good sha~e of the p~ope~ty along the ~oad is eIthe~ In
Ag P~ese~ve o~ owned by the City. so the~e is little p~ope~ty to
assess. It was felt the City does not have the funds to pay its sha~e
of the conc~ete cu~b and gutte~. ag~eeing the ~oad should be imp~oved
to a ~u~al standa~d unless State Aid funds will pay fo~ it.
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING REPAIR
MOTION by Jacobson. Seconded by Pe~~y. that we accept the low bid
f~om P~ofessional Touch in the amount of $5.869.00 to apply a bonding
coat and one coat of HYd~olastic Elastome~ic coating to the Public
Wo~ks Building. 'and move the Resolution autho~izing expenditu~e of
that amount f~om the Pe~manent Imp~ovement Revolving Fund. as Council
decided p~eviously. (See Resolution R117-91) Motion ca~~ied on a
4-Yes. 1-Absent (Smith) vote.
ORDER STREET LIGHT/142ND LANE AND ROUND LAKE BOULEVARD
M~. Koolick advised the Council the 1992 budget includes 10 new st~eet
lights: but the 1991 budget al lows fo~ no new ones. Some we~e o~de~ed
In 1991. but he dIdn't know If they had been installed yet. Council
agreed mo~e ca~e needs to be taken when o~de~ing lights to be su~e
they a~e budgeted fo~. suggesting those o~de~ed this yea~ be Included
as pa~t of the 10 lIghts fo~ 1992. It was also noted that the lIghts
a~e paid fo~ ove~ a flve-yea~ pe~lod.
MOTION by Pe~~y. Seconded by Jacobson. that the CIty install a
st~eet light at o~ nea~ the Inte~section of 142nd Lane NW and Round
Lake Bouleva~d at CIty expense with the unde~standing that the
\ installation and costs Incu~~ed be tImed so that It Is a 1992 budget
.~) ex~endltu~e ~athe~ than In 1991. Motion ca~~led on a 4-Yes. 1-Absent
<Smith) vote.
'\
,...J
""~f~">"""'~""'>\'
,;;Jift.;,.,
iji"'~
,~l "~
:1 n
~ w
'\ J
". :if
'^",
,,,,,,,~~,.,,
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. ff' . .
Sta ,Comm1ttee, Comm1SS1on
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Building Department_M?)
David Almgren ~
September 3, 1991
ITE~pprove Temporary Mobile Home
~. permit/16947 Verdin Street NW
BY:
APPROV~. F;OR
AGEN~ '
X
BY)
L/
Mr. & Mrs. Humphrey, 16947 Verdin Street, had a fire in their home on August 13,
1991 which made the house not habitable. The insurance company got a mobile home
for them to live in and moved the mobile home on to their property shortly after
the fire. The insurance company did not know they needed a permit and Mr. & Mrs.
Humphrey did not remember to get a permit. The trailer is on the property now
and being used.
I
The City Council is requested to approve the attached 90 Day Temporary
Mobile Home Permit.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
'....,/ TO
SECOND BY
~
\
--)
CITY of ANDOVER
1685 CROSSTOWN BOULEVARD N,W. . ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 . (612) 755-5100
90',DAY TEMPORARY
MOBILE HOME PERMIT
PROPERTY OWNER
John and Barbara Humphrey
ADDRESS
16947 Verdin Street N.W.
PHONE
MOBILE HOME OWNER
LOCATION OF MOBILE HOME 16947 Verdin Street NW
PHONE
DATE (MOVE IN)
DATE (MOVE OUT)
REASON FOR MOBILE HOME
House Fire
'.
SIZE OF MOBILE HOME
14' X 70'
DATES APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
AppROVED BY CIT~ COUNCIL
DATE
All applications shall be made pursuant to Ordinance No.6, Section 2.
DA/jp
8/1991
-J
'\
Z. - ;;)~- )91/
~1-11' ~/ J If' ' ,)
'. t"",,-- ~ , l,vf'-- (~ '/ L i~'-"w.J--iZ,~/.2-
r../ \to ,- "" ~- -,. I
j/ 7/'-" V " S;{ f"l tAu
/,-. _4'_ ~ / f r !.
..:..- I .. -v'-<(- _l__ .
C[,'l--Lc"',U,A- hit Y\ S5 3 o~
., l / '
[U9- -" /-.y/ ~t -f ;.\--L u'^- 6 - 13- 9/
, .c....J.... _ -J- 'I
..-l<..~ /u- .1.-L-~ , (.-l''''~-f _ /,()...(.. It,ci '-'..1-
" -+- ,) 1 -,- l' I I ...,.... ,4 I
--'- "~'(/-'- ("C~,lA.- I...~~ v",,- t-<.-Li
~.t...'- l~-t.\-~~.;.... ....L.I.--~
--/. -' \ J~/V7
V'~ L-...__~I.~I_~ -'-~ ~- '- /\ . rJ
(y ,~ 'I ~~v..'f
--
~
_.;.."~t~"'"''~-'~''''''>\'''
'~ "'i..
,~r l
~ .~
1!,~, )
""\. .""~
~'~.....~o!'~
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
CITY OF ANDOVER
September 3, 1991
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENr;;PT
Building Department
,
BY: David Almgren
Staff, Committee, Commission
ITEM
NO.
~ 1992 Fee Schedule/Bldg. Dept.
The City Council is requested to approve the attached resolution
establishing permit fees and service charges:
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
'-) TO
SECOND BY
::,~"
!/
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
~
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PERMIT FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES TO BE
COLLECTED BY THE CITY OF ANDOVER AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO.
SETTING FORTH SUCH FEES.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains:
The following permit fees and service charges are hereby established:
PERMIT FEES
Certificate of Occupancy
Plan Check/Residential
Heating Installations
Air Conditioning Installations
Plumbing (per opening)
(minimum fee)
On-Site Septic System Installation
Sanitary Sewer Installation
Septic System Pumping
Water Installation (public)
Agricultural Building
Footing to Grade
Health Authority Certification
$ 4.00
20.00
25.00
15.00
7.00
10.00
35.00
25.00
2.50
50.00
5.00
15.00
5.00
The permit fee schedule for the Building Department for 1992 shall be
as follows:
1. State of Minnesota Building Valuation Data, cost per square
foot, dated February 1987.
2.
Fees for Commercial
contract bid price.
permit fee.
Buildings shall be computed on the
Plan check fee shall be 65% of the
3. Permit fee shall be based on the 1988 Uniform Building
Code Schedule 3A.
The above fees apply to repairs and alterations requiring inspections
as well as all new installations.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover the
day of
, 19
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
'\
o
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria volk - City Clerk
1992 FEE SCHEDULE -- Adopted
1988 UBC Sch 3A
~
VALUE
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
1,300
1,400
1,500
1,600
1,700
1,800
1,900
2,000
2,100
2,200
2,300
2,400
2,500
2,600
2,700
2,800
2,900
3,000
3,100
3,200
'\
\
'- )
FEE
15.00
17.00
19.00
21. 00
23.00
25.00
27.00
29.00
31.00
33.00
35.00
37.00
39.00
41. 00
43.00
45.00
45.90
46.80
47.70
48.60
49.50
50.40
51. 30
52.20
53.10
54.00
54.90
55.80
TAX
.50
.50
.50
.50
.50
.50
.55
.60
.65
.70
.75
. .80
.85
.90
.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
1.15
1.20
1.25
,1.30'
','
1.35
1.40
1.45
1.50
1.55
1.60
VALUE
3,300
3,400
3,500
3,600
3,700
3,800
3,900
4,000
4,100
4,200
4,300
4,400'
4,500
4,600
4,700
4,800
4,900
5,000
5,100
5,200
5,300
5,400
5,500
5,600
5,700
5,800
5,900
6,000
PEE
56.70
57.60
58.50
59.40
60.30
61.20
62.10
63.00
63.90
64.80
65.70
66.60
67.50
68.40
69.30
70.20
71.10
72.00
72.90
73.80
74.70
75.60
76.50
77 .40
78.30
79.20
80.10
81.00
TAX
1.65
1. 70
VALUE
6,100
6,200
1. 75 6,300
1. 80 6,400
1.85 6,500
1.90 6,600
1.95 6,700
2.00 6,800
2.05 6,900
2.10 - 7,000
2.15 7,100
2.20 7,200
2.25 7,300
2.30 7,400
2.35 7,500
2.40 7,600
2.45 7,700
2.50 7,800
2.55 7,900
2.60 8,000
2.65 8,100
2.70 8,200
2.75 8,300
2.80 8,400
2.85 8,500
2.90 8,600
2.95 8,700
3.00 8,800
FEE
81.90
82.80
83.70
84.60
85.50
86.40
87.30
88.20
89.10
90.00
90.90
91.80
92.70
93.60
94.50
95.40
96.30
97.20
98.10
99.00
99.90
100.80
101. 70
102.60
103.50
104.40
105.30
106.20
TAX
3.05
3.10
3.15
3.20
3.25
3.30
3.35
3.40
3.45
3.50
3.55
3.60
3.65
3.70
3.75
3.80
3.85
3.90
3.95
4.00
4.05
4.10
4.15
4.20
4.25
4.30
4.35
4.40
1~~ PEE SCHEDULE -- Adopted
1988 OBC Sch 3A
VALUE
'\
'---.)
8,900
9,000
9,100
9,200
9,300
9,400
9,500
9,600
9,700
9,800
9,900
10,000
10,100
10,200
10,300
10,400
10,500
10,600
10,700
10,800
10,900
11,000
11,100
11,200
11,300
11,400
11,500
11,600
\
J
PEE
TAX
107.10
4.45
108.00 4.50
108.90 4.55
109.80 4.60
110.70 4.65
111.60 4.70
112.50 4.75
113.40 4.80
114.30 4.85
115.20 4.90
116.10 4.95
117.00 5.00
117.90 5.05
118.80 5.10
119.70 5.15
120.60 5.20
121.50 5.25
122.40 5.30
123.30 5.35
124.20 5.40
125.10 5.45
126.00 ':; 5.50
126.90 5.55
127.80 5.60
128.70 5.65
129.60 5.70
130.50 5.75
131.40 5.80
VALUE
11,700
11,800
11,900
12,000
12,100
12,200
12,300
12,400
12,500
12,600
12,700
12,800
12,900
13,000
13,100
13,200
13,300
13 , 400
13,500
13 , 600
13,700
13 , 800
13,900
14,000
14,100
14,200
14,300
14,400
PEE
132.30
133.20
134.10
135.00
135.90
136.80
137.70
138.60
139.50
140.40
141. 30
142.20
143.10
144.00
144.90
145.80
146.70
147.60
148.50
149.40
150.30
151.20
152.10
153.00
153.90
154.80
155.70
156.60
TAX
5.85
5.90
5.95
6.00
6.05
6.10
6.15
6.20
6.25
6.30
6.35
6.40
6.45
6.50
6.55
6.60
6.65
6.70
6.75
6.80
6.85
6.90
6.95
7.00
7.05
7.10
7.15
7.20
VALUE
PEE
14,500 157.50
14,600 158.40
14,700 159.30
14,800 160.20
14,900 161.10
15,000 162.00
15,100 162.90
15,200 163.80
15,300 164.70
15,400 165.60
15,500 166.50
15,600 167.40
15,700 168.30
15,800 169.20
15,900 170.10
16,000 171.00
16,100 171.90
16,200 172.80
16,300 173.70
16,400 174.60
16,500 175.50
16,600 176.40
16,700 177 . 30
16,800 178.20
16,900 179.10
17,000 180.00
17,100 180.90
17,200 181.80
TAX
7.25
7.30
7.35
7.40
7.45
7.50
7.55
7.60
7.65
7.70
7.75
7.80
7.85
7.90
7.95
8.00
8.05
8.10
8.15
8.20
8.25
8.30
8.35
8.40
8.45
8.50
8.55
8.60
1992 E'EE SCHEDULE -- Adopted
1988 UBC Sch 3A
VALUE
~
17,300
17,400
17,500
17,600
17,700
17,800
17,900
18,000
18,100
18,200
18,300
18,400
18,500
18,600
18,700
18,800
18,900
19,000
19,100
19,200
19,300
19,400
19,500
19,600
19,700
19,800
19.900
20,000
"
,
J
PEE
182.70
183.60
184.50
185.40
186.30
187.20
188.10
189.00
189.90
190.80
191. 70
192.60
193.50
194.40
195.30
196.20
197.10
198.00
198.90
199.80
200.70
201.60
202.50
203.40
204.30
205.20
206.10
207.00
TAX
8.65
8.70
8.75
8.80
8.85
8.90
8.95
9.00
9.05
9.10
9.15
9.20
9.25
9.30
9.35
9.40
9.45
9.50
9.55
9.60
9.65
.9.70
9.75
9.80
9.85
9.90
9.95
10.00
VALUE
21,000
22,000
23,000
24,000
25,000
26,000
27,000
28,000
29,000
30,000
31,000
32,000
33,000
34,000
35,000
36,000
37,000
38,000
39,000
40,000
41,000
42,000
43,000
44,000
45,000
46,000
47,000
48,000
PEE
216.00
225.00
234.00
243.00
252.00
258.50
265.00
271.50
278.00
284.50
291.00
297.50
304.00
310.50
317.00
323.50
330.00
336.50
343.00
349.50
356.00
362.50
369.00
375.50
382.00
388.50
395.00
401. 50
TAX
10.45
11.00
11. 50
12.00
12.50
13.00
13.50
14.00
14.50
15.00
15.50
16.00
16.50
17.00
17.50
18.00
18.50
19.00
19.50
20.00
20.50
21.00
21.50
22.00
22.50
23.00
23.50
24.00
VALUE
FEE
49,000
50,000
408.00
414.50
51,000 419.00
52,000 423.50
53.00 428.00
54,000 432.50
55,000 437.00
56,000 441. 50
57,000 446.00
58,000 450.50
59,000 455.00
60,000 459.50
61,000 464.00
62,000 468.50
63,000 473.00
64,000 477.50
65.000 482.00
66,000 486.50
67,000 491.00
68,000 495.50
69,000 500.00
70,000 504.50
71,000 509.00
72,000 513.50
73,000 518.00
74,000 522.50
75,000 527.00
76,000 531. 50
TAX
24.50
25.00
25.50
26.00
26.50
27.00
27.50
28.00
28.50
29.00
29.50
30.00
30.50
31.00
31.50
32.00
32.50
33.00
33.50
34.00
34.50
35.00
35.50
36.00
36.50
37.00
37.50
38.00
1992 PEE SCHEDULE -- Adopted
VALUE
1988 UBC Sch 3A
,-.J
77 , 000
78,000
79,000
80,000
81,000
82,000
83,000
84,000
85,000
86,000
87,000
88,000
89,000
90,000
91,000
92,000
93,000
94,000
95,000
96,000
97,000
98,000'
99,000
100,000
101,000
102,000
103,000
104,000
\
',J
PEE
TAX
536.00
540.50
38.50
39.00
545.00 39.50
549.50 40.00
554.00 40.50
558.50 41.00
563.00 41. 50
567.50 42.00
572.00 42.50
576.50 43.00
581. 00 43.50
585.50 44.00
590.00 44.50
594.50 45.00
599.00 45.50
603.50 46.00
608.00 46.50
612.50 47.00
617.00 47.50
621. 50 48.00
626.00 48.50
630.50 ~9.00
635.00 49.50
639.50 50.00
643.00 50.50
646.50 51.00
650.00 51.50
653.50 52.00
VALUE
105,000
106,000
107,000
108,000
109,000
110,000
111,000
112,000
113,000
114,000
115,000
116,000
117,000
118,000
119,000
120,000
121,000
122,000
123,000
124,000
125,000
126,000
127,000
128,000
129,000
130,000
131,000
132,000
PEE
TAX
657.00
660.50
52.50
53.00
664.00 53.50
667.50 54.00
671.00 54.50
674.50 55.00
678.00 55.50
681.50 56.00
685.00 56.50
688.50 57.00
692.00 57.50
695.50 58.00
699.00 58.50
702.50 59.00
706.00 59.50
709.50 60.00
713.00 60.50
716.50 61. 00
720.00 61. 50
723.50 62.00
727.00 62.50
730.50 63.00
734.00 63.50
737.50 64.00
741.00 64.50
744.50 65.00
748.00 65.50
751. 50 66.00
VALUE
133,000
134,000
135,000
136,000
137,000
138,000
139,000
140,000
141,000
-'142,000
143,000
144,000
145,000
146,000
147,000
148,000
149,000
150,000
151,000
152,000
153,000
154,000
155,000
156,000
157,000
158,000
159,000
160,000
PEE
TAX
755.00
758.50
66.50
67.00
762.00 67.50
765.50 68.00
769.00 68.50
772.50 69.00
776.00 69.50
779.50 70.00
783.00 70.50
786.50 71.00
790.00 71.50
793.50 72.00
797.00 72.50
800.50 73.00
804.00 73.50
807.50 74.00
811.00 74.50
814.50 75.00
818.00 75.50
821.50 76.00
825.00 76.50
828.50 77.00
832.00 77.50
835.50 78.00
839.00 78.50
842.50 79.00
846.00 79.50
849.50 80.00
1992 PEE SCHEDULE -- Adopted
VALUE
TAX
1988 UBC Sch 3A
PEE
,-.J
161,000 853.00 80.50
162,000 856.50 81.00
163,000 860.00 81.50
164,000 863.50 82.00
165,000 867.00 82.50
166,000 870.50 83.00
167,000 874.00 83.50
168,000 877.50 84.00
169,000 881.00 84.50
170,000 884.50 85.00
171,000 888.00 85.50
172,000 891.50 86.00
173,000 895.00 86.50
174,000 898.50 87.00
175,000 902.00 87.50
176,000 905.50 88.00
177,000 909.00 88.50
178,000 912.50 89.00
179,000 916.00 89.50
180,000 919.50 90.00
181,000 923.50 90.5~
182,000 926.50 91.00
183,000 930.00 91.50
184,000 933.50 92.00
185,000 937.00 92.50
"
\
\. _.../
186,000 940.50 93.00
187,000 944.00 93.50
188,000 947.50 94.00
VALUE
PEE
TAX
189,000
951.00 94.50
190,000
954.50 95.00
191,000
958.00 95.50
192,000
961.,50 96.00
965.00 96.50
193,000
194,000
968.50 97.00
195,000
972.00 97.50
196,000
975.50 98.00
197,000
979.00 98.50
198,000
982.50 99.00
199,000
986.00 99.50
200,000 989.50 100.00
201,000 993.00 100.50
202,000 996.50 101.00
203,000 1000.00 101.50
204,000 1003.50 102.00
205,000 1007.00 102.50
206,000 1010.50 103.00
207,000 1014.00 103.50
208,000 1017.50 104.00
209,000 1021.00 104.50
210,000 1024.50 105.00
211,000 1028.00 105.50
212,000 1031.50 106.00
213,000 1035.00 106.50
214,000 1038.50 107.00
215,000 1042.00 107.50
VALUE
PEE
TAX
216,000 1045.50 108.00
217,000 1049.00 108.50
218,000 1052.50 109.00
219,000 1056.00 109.50
220,000 1059.50 110.00
221,000 1063.00 110.50
222,000, 1066.50 111.00
223,000 1070.00 111.50
224,000 1073.50 112.00
225,000 1077.00 112.50
226,000 1080.50 113.00
227,000 1084.00 113.50
228,000 1087.50 114.00
229,000 1091.00 114.50
230,000 1094.50 115.00
231,000 1098.00 115.50
232,000 1101.50 116.00
233,000 1105.00 116.50
234,000 1108.50 117.00
235,000 1112.00 117.50
236,000 1115.50 118.00
237,000 1119.00 118.50
238,000 1122.50 119.00
239,000 1126.00 119.50
240,000 1129.50 120.00
241,000 1133.00 120.50
242,000 1136.50 121.00
243,000 1140.00 121.~0
::J
;;,;,"":";'.~Y.:>;...,;",~.
'.'.(1\""\.\
i!,.r\J
~" :/
';'~~.-.;~,*'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE ~g~tgm8g~ J,
1991
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Staff, Committee, Comm.
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Public Works
BY:
ITEM Award Bids/Misc. Equip.
NO. Sale
BY: Frank Stone
The City Council is requested to approve all bids introdu
on the attached so that all items can be passed on to the
bidders.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
'~-) TO
SECOND BY
.,
'J
Miscellaneous Equipment Sale
Bidder
Rose~la
Rose a
Jo n Ga Vln
Scott Protivinsky
Rosella Sonsteby
Don Olson
Rosella Sonsteby
Todd Zager
Brlan Kraa e
Brian Kraabel
Don Olson
John Galvin
Ray Jones
Rose a Sonste
Fran Stone
Roger L. Stanley
Ro er Stan e
James Nova
Don Olson
Richard Vickstrom
Carla West
Brian Kraabel
Don 0 son
Jane Peterson
Don Olson
Don Olson
Don Olson
Jo~n Galvin
Jo~n Galvin
Brian Johnson
John Galvin
Don Olson
Rosella Sonsteby
Roger L. Stanle
Scott Protlvlnsky
Rosella Sonsteby
Ray Jones
Rose a Sonste y
Todd Zager
Fran Stone
James Nova
Ray Jones
R1C ar V1C strom
Don Olson
Ray Jones
Ervin Dryden
Rosella Sonsteby
Ervin Draden
Ray Sowa a
Rosella Sonsteby
\......)
Case
cabinet
cabinet
motor
truck
er
locker
Bid
1. 00
.00
,
I
.-..../
..>~';,.''''.~.,,~.'''''\''
'l '.,"\
;f ~~
t,j
~, II
k~ }'
-~i!':--,........ _"_~/
.""'r,,",,~'!;!IO.."
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ITEM Adopt Resolution/
NO. Reimbursement Rules
1.
DATE September 3, 1991
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
Howard D. Koolick .~
Finance Director
BY:
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Staff, Committee Comm.
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to adopt the attached
resolution which will provide proof of compliance with the
proposed reimbursement regulations.
BACKGROUND
Attached you will find a copy of a letter sent to the City by our
bond counsel, Dave Kennedy of Holmes and Graven. The letter
describes the proposed reimbursement rules relating to tax exempt
bonding which were scheduled to become effective September 7,
1991. The effective date has been postponed, however, he
recommends adoption of the resolution now to prevent future
problems.
The resolution declares the City's intent to reimburse certain
past and future expenditures from bond proceeds. Future
expenditures will be listed on exhibit A as they occur. Past
expenditures are documented on exhibit B.
Bill Hawkins will be able to answer any questions you may have.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
SECOND BY
'[
HOLMES & GRAVEN
CHARTERED
Attorneys at Law
470 Pillsbury Center. Minneapolis. Minnesota .5.5401:
(612) 337.9300
Facsimile (612) 337-9310
,
-J
ROBERT A, ALSOP
PAUL D. BAERTSCHI
RONALD H. BATTY
YlARY J. BRENDEN
STEPHEN J. BUBUL
ROBERT C. CARLSON
CHRISTINE M. CHAtE
JOHN B. DEAN
~ARY G. DOBBINS
JEFFREY ENG
STEfANIE N. GALEY
DAVID L. GRAVEN
CORRINE A. HEINE
JAMES S. HOLMES
DAVID J. KENNEDY
JOHN R. LARSON
WELLINGTON H. LAW
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL
JULIE A. LAWLER
CHARLES L. LEFEVERE
JOHN YI. LEFEVRE. JR.
ROBERT J. LISDALL
LAURA K. MOLLET
DANIEL R. ~ELSON
BARBARA L. PORTWOOD
MARY FRANCE."i SKALA
JAMES M. STRO:\tMEN
STEVEN M. T ALLEN
JAMES J. THOMSON. JR.
LARRY M. WERTHEIM
BONNIE L. WilKINS
OF COl'NSEL
ROBERT L. DAVIDSON
JOHN G. HOESCHLER
rtUl,jUst 21, 1991
Ms. Shirley Clinton
Treasurer
1685 Crosstown Boulevard N.W.
Andover, Minnestoa 55304
Re: Proposed Reimbursement Rules
Dear Ms. Clinton:
The Internal Revenue Service has issued proposed regulations _
referred to as the "reimbursement rules" - providing, in general
terms, that proceeds of tax-exempt governmental bonds used to
reimburse the issuer for prior expenditures will not be deemed to
have been "spent" unless certain requirements are met. (A
summary of the reimbursement rules is enclosed for your informa-
tion. )
The proposed rules would apply to bonds issued after September 7,
1991. Much adverse comment has been submitted to the Service
about the impracticability and burdensome nature of the rules;
and there is a possibility that they will be modified substan-
tially or that their effective date postponed. But if this does
not occur it is important that cities do their best to comply
with the rules.
In most general terms the reimbursement rules provide that:
(i) a declaration of "official intent" by the City be made
not more than two years prior to the reimbursement of
expenditures from bond proceeds;
(ii)
the reimbursement from bond proceeds must
within a) one year after the expenditure or b)
after the project financed was "placed in
whichever date is later; and
be made
one year
service"
)
,
-)
(iii) "official intent" during the period from September 8,
1989 and September 7, 1991 can be shown by "objective"
evidence that the issuer intended at the time of the
expenditure to reimburse itself from bond proceeds.
Enclosed is a sample resolution with exhibits that we think will
put the City in compliance with the rules as proposed if it is
adopted prior to the expenditure to be reimbursed. The resolu-
tion:
(i) states a general intent to reimburse;
(ii) designates the chief financial officer of the City as
the person to declare official intent with regard to
expenditures;
(iii) sets up a system for recording expenditures and track-
ing the one year period; and
(iv) establishes objective evidence of the City's practice
of reimbursing expenditures.
Please note that in completing Exhibit A, it will be necessary to
include a certain amount of detail in describing the project, so
that it uniquely describes the project or property referenced.
For example, if the project is various street and sewer improve-
ments, it should be further identified by reference to project
number, location and cost.
We think the resolution and forms are self-explanatory (to the
degree that these' complex rules can be explained), but if you
have any questions be sure to contact me or any of the bond
approving lawyers in our office. Even with the uncertainty about
the effective date of the rules, we think it prudent for the City
to promptly adopt the resolution and put the system of record
keeping in place.
One further requirement of the reimbursement rules is that an
issuer's declaration of official intent may be relied upon only
if the issuer has a history of in fact issuing reimbursement
bonds in at least 75% of the cases that it said it would.
Therefore, it is not advisable to declare official intent prior
to making every expenditure; only do so in cases where there is a
realistic expectation of bonding for the expenditure.
, "
Another'note of caution is in order. If the City made expendi-
tures it expected to reimburse from bond proceeds and those
expendi tures were' made more than two years ago it may not be
possible to finance those expenditures tax-exempt. If you think
this is. a problem for your City please contact us immediately t
see what, if anything, can be done to reimburse those expendi-
tures.
, )
~,
,,)
, "-
"~)
We'll attempt to keep you
ments concerning the rules.
receive a certified copy of
Yours very truly,
HOLMES &
By
David
DJK:caw
Enclosure
KE40S-11.
cc: City Administrator
informed of any significant develop-
Also, if convenient we would like to
the resolution after its adoption.
CITY OF ANDOVER . MINNESOTA
"i
J
RESOLUTION NO.
DECLARING THE OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE CITY OF
ANDOVER TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN
EXPENDITURES FROM THE PROCEEDS OF TAXABLE OR
TAX-EXEMPT BONDS TO BE ISSUED BY THE CITY
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Minnesota (the "City") as follows:
Andover
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01 The Internal Revenue Service has issued proposed new Tres. Reg.
S 1.103-17 (the "Reimbursement Rules") providing that proceeds of tax-exempt
bonds used to reimburse prior expenditures will not be deemed spent unless certain
requirements are met.
1.02 The City has incurred certain expenditures since September 8, 1989
and expects to incur certain additional expenditures, all of which may be financed
temporarily from sources other than taxable or tax-exempt bonds, and reimbursed
from the proceeds of a taxable or tax-exempt bond.
1.03 The new reimbursement rules will apply to bonds issued after
September 7, 1991.
1.04 The Reimbursement Rules require that the allocation of proceeds of
the bonds to be issued to reimburse any expenditures will be made not later than
the later of one year after the expenditure was paid or one year after the property
was placed in service.
1.05 The expenditures to be reimbursed must have a reasonably expected
economic life of at least one year, in that they are, or are to be incorporated in or
become a part of, a facility, are properly changeable to or may be capitalized as
part of the basis of the facility, and if the City were subject to federal income
taxation, would be depreciable over the facility's economic life.
1.06 Expenditures made between September 8, 1989 and September 7,
1991, may be reimbursed as described in Section 1.02 herein only if there is
objective evidence that, at the time the expenditures were paid, the City
reasonably expected to reimburse such expenditures with proceeds of a taxable or
tax exempt borrowing. '
1.07 If any future expenditure to be reimbursed is not made within two
years of the date of this Resolution, this Resolution may be updated to the extent
such, expenditure is still expected to be reimbursed with bond proceeds at a later
dd~ .
1.08 Proceeds of the bonds issued to reimburse the expenditures described
in Exhibit A will be deemed spent only when (1) an allocation entry .is made on the
,
'--)
1
~
books or records of the City with respect to the bonds; (2) the entry specifically
identifies an actual expenditure to be reimbursed; and (3) the allocation is
effective to relieve the bond proceeds from restrictions on unspent proceeds under
applicable documents and state laws.
1.09 None of the proceeds of the bonds issued to reimburse the City for
expenditures will be used (i) to refund another tax-exempt governmental issue or
(ii) to create or increase the balance in a sinking fund or replace funds used for
such purpose, or (iii) to create or increase the balance in a reserve or replacement
fund or replace funds used for such purposes, or (iv) to reimburse an expenditure
originally paid with the proceeds of another tax-exempt bond obligation; unless (i)
such amounts are deposited in a bona fide debt service fund, or (ii) the original tax-
exempt issue was not reasonably expected to be used to finance the expenditure.
Section 2. Intent Declared.
2.01 The City reasonably expects to expend moneys after the date hereof
from the sources described in Exhibit A on a temporary basis to pay the
expenditures described in Exhibit A. The City reasonably expects to reimburse
itself for such expenditures from the proceeds of taxable or tax-exempt bonds, the
debt service for which is expected to be paid from the sources described in Exhibit
A.
2.02 The City also expended certain moneys between September 8, 1989
and the date hereof from the sources described in Exhibit A. At the time of those
expenditures, the City reasonably expected to reimburse the expenditures from the
prDceeds of taxable or tax exempt bonds, the debt service for which is expected to
be paid from the sources described in Exhibit A. Objective evidence of the City's
reasonable expectations regarding such reimbursement is summarized in Exhibit B.
2.03 The City Administrator is authorized to designate appropriate
additions to Exhibit A in circumstances where time is of the essence, and any such
designatiDn shall be reported to the City Council at the earliest practicable date
and shall be filed with the official books and records of the City at the times and in
the manner provided in Section 2.04.
2.04 This resolution shall be maintained as part of the books and records
of the City at City Hall, and shall be continuously available during normal business
hours of the City on every business day of the period beginning not more than 10
days after adoption of this resolution and ending on the last date of issue of any
bonds issued to reimburse expenditures described in Exhibit A.
2.05. This Resolution is an expression of the reasonable expectations of the
City based on the facts and circumstances known to the City as of the date hereof.
The anticipated reimbursements set forth at Exhibit A are consistent with the
City's budgetary and financial circumstances. No sources other than those
described at Exhibit A are expected to be allocated to such expenditures on a long
term . basis pursuant' to the City's budget. The City has' not made any allocatiDn,
budget, or restriction of moneys or adopted any requirement or policy to reimburse
a fund, the primary purpose of which is to prevent moneys from being deemed to be
available to pay an expenditure the City intends to reimburse with proceeds of a
borrowing. ,
\
'-..../ .
2
"
-)
, '\
....~
2.06 This Resolution is intended to constitute official intent for purposes
of proposed Tres. Reg. S 1.103-17 and any successor law, regulation or ruling. This
resolution shall be modified to the extent required or permitted by Tres. Reg.
S 1.103-17 as finally adopted, or any successor law, regulation or ruling.
Approved by the City Council of the City of
3rd day of September , 1991.
Andover
this
Attest:
Mayor
City Clerk
3
::J
Description of
Property or
Proiect
')
\.J
~
EXHIBIT A
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED , -1991
Estimated Size,
Quantity
or Cost
4
Expected
Temporary
Financing
Source
Expected
Source to
pay Bond
Debt Service
o
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $717.97 from April 16, 1991
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. *91-7 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
~J
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of April 16, 1991, through August 31,
1991 the City'S expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City'S budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City'S 1991 budget and financial records on file
in City Hall.
,
\
'-/
o
o
o
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $2,083 from June 18, 1991
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. #91-6 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City'S consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of June 18, 1991 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City's budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City'S 1991 budget and financial records on file
in City Hall.
"
o
, '\
'J
, '\
'0
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $1,024.75 from June 18, 1991
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. *91-5 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of June 18, 1991 through August 31,
1991 the City'S expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City's budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City'S budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1991 budget and financial records on file
in Ci ty HalL
~~
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $63,038.96 from June 18, 1991
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. #91-4 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
/ \
~)
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of June 18, 1991 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consiBtent with the City's budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City'S budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1991 budget and financial records on file
in City Hall.
,
, )
:J
, "
\.--,'
,- "
o
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $205,406.56 from may 7, 1991
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. ~91-2 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City'S consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of May 7, 1991 through August 31, 1991
the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from bond
proceeds was consistent with the City's budgetary and financial
circumstances. The City did not at that time have funds
allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise available
under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as evidenced
by the City'S 1991 budget and financial records on file in City
Hall.
~
, ,
,~
, "
\~
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $2,000 from July 16, 1991
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. #91-12 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City'S consi~tent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of July 16, 1991 through August 31,
1991 the City'S expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City'S budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1991 budget and financial records on file
in City Hall.
o
,
,
~ ~
'\
, )
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $1,025.25 from July 16, 1991
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement project No. *91-10 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of July 16, 1991 through August 31,
1991 the City'S expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City'S budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City'S 1991 budget and financial records on file
in City Hall.
~J
~J
~)
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $286,720.07 from March 20, 1990
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. #90-3/90-16
as described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City
reasonably expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from
the proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City'S consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 19866
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 19876
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of March 20, 1991 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City's budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City'S budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
o
~~
~
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $750.75 from October 2, 1990
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement project No. *90-9 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of October 2, 1990 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
o
\
, /
\
, )
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $62,293.58 from June 5, 1990
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. #90-6 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City'S consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of June 5, 1990 through August 31, 1991
the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from bond
proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and financial
circumstances. The City did not at that time have funds ,
allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise available
under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as evidenced
by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial records on file
in City Hall.
. '\
',J
'\
'- )
"
"\.-.J
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $100.80 from April 17, 1990
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement project No. *90-4 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City'S consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of April 17, 1990 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City'S budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
:J
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $27,199.37 from January 3, 1991
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement project No. *90-25 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). , The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
~~)
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of January 3, 1991 through August 31,
1991 the City'S expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1991 budget and financial records on file
in City Hall.
. ,
\._.J
~
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $2,194.11 from October 16, 1990
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. #90-23 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City'S consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
~)
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of October 16, 1990 through August 31,
1991 the City'S expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
\
~--)
~)
~-)
'\
......J~
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $75,531.10 from July 17, 1990
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. #90-2 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of July 17, 1990 through August 31,
1991 the City'S expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City'S 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
o
~~
'\
....J
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $1,242.40 from July 17, 1990
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. #90-17 as
.described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City'S consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of July 17, 1990 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
~
~
, ,
J
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $12,177.96 from October 16, 1990
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement project No. #90-16 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of October 16, 1990 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City's budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
o
, ,
o
~
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $35,859.84 from July 17, 1990
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. *90-15 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of July 17, 1990 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City's budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City'S 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
()
, )
'--/
, ,
'---"
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $59,217.97 from August 7, 1990
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. *90-14 as
. described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of August 7, 1990 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City's budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City'S 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
...
. '\
",)
. '\
',J
'\
o
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $2,113.68 from June 19, 1990
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement project No. ~90-10/
90-11 as described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City
reasonably expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from
the proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of June 19, 1990 through August 31,
1991 the City'S expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City'S 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
()
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $1,224 from February 6, 1990
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement project No. *89-27 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City'S consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
\
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
~J
2. During the period of February 6, 1990 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City'S 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
~
,
:_)
"
\_)
,,)
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $3,126.55 from February 6, 1990
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. *89-26 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of February 6, 1990 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the city's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
/)
,_/
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $1,052.22 from February 6, 1990
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. #89-25 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
~)
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of February 6, 1990 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
o
o
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $28,748.36 from October 17, 1989
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. #89-22 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
"
'J
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of October 17, 1989 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the city'S budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City'S 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
"
,
" ../
C)
"
. ,
.~
. '\
'.J
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $50,777.27 from July 18, 1989
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement project No. *89-15/18
as described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City
reasonably expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from
the proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City'S consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of July 18, 1989 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
()
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $273,739.55 from October 17, 1989
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement project No. #89-17 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
,
'.~
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of October 17, 1989 through August 31,
1991 the City'S expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
",_J
~J
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $279 from February 6, 1990
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. #89-16 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City'S consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
,
" )
~
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of February 6, 1990 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City's budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City'S 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
'.~
o
"
u
"~)
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $5,546.12 from June 6, 1989
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. #89-13 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of June 6, 1989 through August 31, 1991
the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from bond
proceeds was consistent with the City's budgetary and financial
circumstances. The City did not at that time have funds
allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise available
under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as evidenced
by the City'S 1990 and 1991 budget and financial records on file
in Ci ty Hall.
, \
o
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $5,043.62 from March 7, 1989
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement project No. #89-34 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
'\
"J
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of March 7, 1989 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City'S budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
<J
o
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $4,451.60 from July 18, 1989
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. *88-16 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
~
\J
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of July 18, 1989 through August 31,
1991 the City'S expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City's budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
, )
\
~)
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $102.69 from April 4, 1989
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. #89-5 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
,
\J
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of April 4, 1989 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City's budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City'S budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
o
)
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $71.42 from April 4, 1989
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. *89-7 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City'S consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
)
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of April 4, 1989 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
;
/
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $18.60 from July 18, 1989
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. *89-11 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
)
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 19878
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of July 18, 1989 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City's budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
,
)
)
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $196.08 from June 20, 1989
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement Project No. #89-12 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
)
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 19868
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of June 20, 1989 through August 31,
1991 the City'S expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City'S budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City'S budget to pay for the Expenditures, as
evidenced by the City'S 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
)
EXHIBIT B
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION
ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY REASONABLY EXPECTED
TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN PAST EXPENDITURES WITH TAXABLE
OR TAX EXEMPT BOND PROCEEDS
The City paid approximately $27.50 from June 20, 1989
through August 31, 1991 for engineering studies, reports and
construction costs related to Improvement project No. *89-14 as
described in Exhibit A (the "Expenditures). The City reasonably
expected to reimburse itself for the Expenditures from the
proceeds of taxable or tax exempt debt, as supported by the
following evidence:
1. It has been the City's consistent practice to reimburse
engineering and various administrative costs as well as
construction costs for public improvement projects out of bond
proceeds. This practice has been followed in every public
improvement bond issue in the past ten years, which includes the
following issues:
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985A
General obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1985B
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986A
General obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1986B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987A
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1987B
General Obligation Temporary Improvement Bonds Series 1988
General Obligation Improvement Bonds Series 1989
2. During the period of June 20, 1989 through August 31,
1991 the City's expectation to reimburse the Expenditures from
bond proceeds was consistent with the City's budgetary and
financial circumstances. The City did not at that time have
funds allocated on a long-term basis, reserved or otherwise
available under the City's budget to pay for the Expenditures, aE
evidenced by the City's 1990 and 1991 budget and financial
records on file in City Hall.
/
:J
.'~'{<";""'~"~'''''\~
,;x' t-l..,
;t~",\
~;l~:i
\\ l
"\~.;~..."..,Q'
""'~.V'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
September 3, 1991
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM Change Order on FD
NO. fl. Trucks
BY:
Bob peac~
Bond Coordinator
On August 19, 20 and 21 the Truck Committee went out to Pierce in
Appleton, WI, to inspect Engine #2 and Ladder #5. We then went
to Alexis, IL, and inspected Tankers #8 and #9. This "prepaint"
inspection by owner is included in the contract and is an
important part of the overal I construction because it is the only
physical inspection of the trucks before they are completed.
The following change requests are a result of these inspections.
Most of these changes are no-cost refinements in location of
items on the trucks. Others are items not defined in the
original spec or not observable on the line drawings we have been
working from.
Pierce Job #E6580, Engine 2: Total $ 654.00
Pierce Job #E6581, Ladder 5: Total 1,914.00
Alexis Job #1489, Tanker 8: Total 1,676.48
Alexis Job #1488, Tanker 9: Total 1 .577 . 75
Total Change Orders $5,822.23
AI I changes to date, including these, amount to a 2.7 percent
increase to the original bid.
A motion is needed to approve changes to the Pierce and Alexis
contracts for the above amounts. These will be incorporated into
the overall budget in a few days.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
'-_ TO
SECOND BY
· AU? 28 '91 11:44 FROM ALEXIS FIRE EQUIP.
PAGE.001
...
FIRE APPARATUS CO.
'\
'-)
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL LETTER
DATE:
I
lS" 100~/ql
TO:
_g 0 h Pea c:.h
tr; a - l.J. 3 '-I- -
gre
FAX#:
3S-~
FR{)l\tI:
NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW: 7
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++~++++++++
~~ ~ t.Jety WI!
len ~x(Jen~;t1ce.:1:-
t.
..
'\
"--./
~:~: Box 549 it 109 E. Broadway ..
.,~-._-_..__.._.._..... ._..
ALEXIS, Il 61412
.. (309)482.6121
.
FAX (309)482-3235
HU~ ~O '~l ll:q( rKUM HLtXI~ fIRE-EQUIP.
-PAGE--:-006
~
~
.-.J
ALEXIS FIRE EQUIPMENT COMPANY
SALES CHANGE ORDER
PAGE 1
DATE:
JOB NUMBER:
CUSTOMER:
AUQust 28. 1 ~~1
1489 (4x6l
Andover. MN
~
Contract ~n Of Change $hld $Subtract
Plat # To-
1) Add treadplate dress to existing cab -
steps. Step on passengr side shall
extend to just behind mudflaps.
Dress fuel tank with treadplate. $525.48
2) Shoreline should be placed below
drivers door and far back as possiblE
with air connection next to it. N/C
3} Add one (1) adjustable shelf to all
. remaining compartments. $450.00
(Left front compt ad. shelf was spec'd)
4) All compartments shall have
spattered finish. $475.00
5) Gauge panel and pump panel
shall have a black textured finish. N/C
",: '
6) Add one (1) large folding step
beneath the crosslay on each
side. $112.50
7) There shall be one (1) set of 8
switches located in open area of
of dash(SIMILAR TO SHIRLAND)
in this order:
Master
Master light
Beacons
(2 rear & 4 rotating in light bar)
Stingers & Intersection lights
Strobes
Right scene, Left scene
Work lights
High Idle
,,----- -.-......,.- ",......,,-"_'-'1.--.J ,-..",- -'-',,If.......I.
I n.....i--. ~~ I
Numbers 6 & 8 will be independent
of the master light switch. These
,J switches shall be secured into an
aluminum panel painted black.
(See Wayne B. for more details) N/C
8) Petersen recessed lights shall be
used on the rear of the apparatus,
utilized as backup, stopltumltail
lights. N/C
9) The switches for the rear deck
lights shall be placed on the inside
of the rear body panel in lieu of
on the light assembly. N/C
10) There shall be one (1) control for
the rear dump located on the
upper portion of the back waif of
the left rear compartment. N/C
11) Add horizontal non-slip grab
rails just below the crosslay area
on both sides. $125.00
12) Put stop chains on rear compt.
fold down door. N/C
13) Wheel chocks shall be located
under left side of body in front of
rear wheels. N/C
14) Delete suspended electronic
console. N/C
15) A 2" to 3" DOOR OPEN flashing
light shall be located (recessed if
possible) on headliner of cab. N/C
16) Change drawing to reflect Mini-
Maxi strobes in grille. L-Red ($112.50)
R-White.
'0
. !
~
,J
17) Add pump to tank fill recycle
1.112" hose.
18) Delete Lettering.
$301.00
($200.00)
TOTALS
$1,988.98
($312.50)
T
Atrthorizod Customer Represezrr
Sales Representative: [s! ell ~J/L .' ~ ~~<t,~
- . I
Approved By Officer AFE: Is!
** TOTAL PAGE.008 **
AYG 28 '91 11:45 FROM ALEXIS FIRE EQUIP.
PAGE.002
,)
ALEXIS FIRE EQUIPMENT COMPANY
SALES CHANGE ORDER
PAGE 1
DATE:
AUQust 28. 1991
JOB NUMBER:
1488 (4x4\
CUSTOMER: Andover. MN
~~ ~n Of Change $Ad:l $Subtract
_To^' ...
1) Federal Q2B siren shall be mounted -
on left side of front bumper.
There will be a foot switch for the
driver and one for passenger. No
control on steering wheel. N/C
2) Winch control shall be mounted on
left side front bumper, towards
rear of bumper. Tags showing
lever direction will be secured
close to control. N/C
3) Relocate the muffler on pump to
under the tail board. Exhaust shall
be expelled towards the side of
truck. Remove all plumbing
associated with priming and plug
~oles. $312.50
4) Add the following; to be placed on
pump compartment.
Vernier throttle
On/Off switch
Choke control
One (1) 1.1/2" Rear Disc. control $200.00
5) Fuel tank for pump shall be located
on shelf located above pump in
same compartment. $43.75
6) Add one (1) 1.1/2" discharge
located in rear gauge panel. $278.00
"
'- )
AI.IG 28 '91-1(:46 FROM ALEXIS FIRE-EQUIP.
PAGE.003
n.......... e-.....
,~
\
, ,-..-J
.;;;J.L .L.L. '-to
r,,",VI"I-ML.:C.^.I.~
r .I.""'c.-c.'.:l!U.l.r'.-
t"H\:II:-;-UU4
in this order:
Master
Master light
Beacons
(2 rear & 4 rotating in light bar)
Stingers & Intersection lights
Strobes
Left scene Right scene
Work lights
High Idle
Numbers 6 & a will be independent
of the master light switch. These
switches shall be secured into an
aluminum panel painted black.
(See Wayne B. for more details)
19) Also located on dash will be:
Master kill
Tank fill gauge
Brake for Q2B
Horn/siren for electric siren
(shall be connected with chassis horn) N/C
_N/C
20) Air brake control will be moved
21) Si{lt!t comp~rrm.:tl~tA M;\II IVI'v'A
spattered finish.
22) Shorelines for air and battery
charger shall be located below
drivers door, as far back as possible.
23) Air horns and electric siren shall
recessed into bumper with no mesh
in front.
24) Weldon 2010 lights will be used
inlieu of Weldon 1010 on rear of
truck.
$219.00
N/C
N/C
N/C
25) There shall be a silver ring painted
on the wheels. (SEE WAYNE B.
FOR DETAILS)
N/C
nm c8n~ole. l '1'1 d'll 111.....i.
I'I'v
'-)
" '\
'--_./
AUG 28 '91 11:47 FROM ALEXIS FIRE EQUIP.
27) Electronic siren head to be
located in dash.
N/C
28) A 2" to 3" DOOR OPEN flashing
light shall be located (recessed if
possible) on headliner of cab.
29) Finish - paint shall be DuPont #60
light red, EXCEPT the top of the cab
from the bottom of the windows up.
30) Change Maxi strobes in grille
to Mini-Maxi strobes.
N/C
N/C
31) Delete the lettering.
TOTALS
$1,890.25
T
Authorized Customer RepreLt'ive: IsI
Sales Representative: Is! ~ cR ~-e..c.k,
Approved By Officer AFE: Is!
PAGE.005
(112.50)
(200.00)
($312.50)
hi.d.~'""r-
I ~. '.
- ,- - ,:~ ,- '-- -t> =4 )> 0 0
: (j'- ,,,,,,--- ;.::.. ;,..",) - m "'0 m ~
~ ,v'\ ~ == "'0 )>
I '" :. . :IJ r- m
~ 0 m
~ r"\ '"':... < :IJ
~ V " ..... ~ 7iJ :L.. ..... )>
-.
:t. :t. ,-, r.
~ ... ~
. -
_. --~--_._-- --_._'---.-----------------_.~------- ------..-.---------
, ( ) ,~ ~
'-) '> t.. ~
'- - ., -l
~-- ~ .... . ~
" c c ~
c 0
. ~
u
n
~ ==
n
t'!l
i
' """\ r--..." ~
" ~ tJ \":: \;'\ .. , '" ~
(') ~ ~ ::z: :;q I
C \.....,.' f1\ ...... - l' Ii\ ,..., "
'\:J ,... ~. ~ '0 -4 '-' ,0 ~
CJl ~"<\. " ""l\ -, \-J .....
'"
d f1\ .... I ....\.. -f ~
~ " ~ "'I l'" "
s: " -\ .... 0-' "\j >- ~
.... G'\ 1"'\. C ( ., - :::::, , -f 'J'j
m C. '" S -,.':" " ,.... a:
:tl " .... - !""\ <.: " ""i
~ C. '''l '-.) 0 ~
)> ~ 1:..) - m
D -\ .... "'\ -', 0 2
." C\ ~ - <: "Tl
"'0 ~ -- ,.... :\J i):. ;-\ N\ r< m
:tl ("'- '-'~ -I .;;;: Z ~
'""t\ "'!) ,..... -f 0
0 ......:; ....
~ l\l -., '\ '"\ (:' ~ :L "'- " m
l"< ....., '.. t> 1\ I\J :D
r- ;;. (\~ f\j ~. (' "'\ :;::.' II )> (") (') (") c....
-..! ~ ~ ::::. ~ c 0 c 0
;1 :, ~ '" .... " -f
(') "- .... , , 0 OJ
- :><, 9 -l 'J c:v ~ ~ m (Jl z (Jl
c - -1 "- .... ~ 0 en -i -i -i Z
~ '\'t. r~ -, 1'1 \..... C 0 :tl 0
') " ~ ..., n )> c
" "'- ~ \i t,.' '\.> m s: s: s:
~ 1'- .... -1 ..... -i..~' N en ::; ()
s: " ~ 1..1 0 -f n m -i m OJ
~\.; ..... '" ~ \ :D " Ci" :IJ )> :IJ m
m ... '"
:tl ~ --.., "- ~ C ~: 'ij II III )> 0 :IJ
'0 ~
...... .... '\1' ( - :-- -f '0 ."
..... I.... -j 0 Z
~ - '-. .... "- 'S- ~ N .. "'0
C C ... 0 :IJ
..... .... ..... Z 01 '0 CJl
\1 '- ..., r--.... I 'J <-, .'). .. 0 -i
, iii < :tl
~' 1"""'1\ t ..,. - )> ~
\:::- '-, ~ ..... -f <II
~ '" \..j t '. " .. r.
(., ..... , ., ^'. ~\ :.. \. .j>, III
'- -...j ..... ,"- ~"" .e ;:t?
l' \d' '" "\ '. .... II
.....~j ",'
...... ,... '\ ~ '" ~) x U,
-.. l., J
""\ ..... 0
- --. ).- ,', , _r-.. r ~ 't~
- ~. ~" i:; --
'- . \::~ '\
" " " \.:;, , ..
........ ..:: .....\ .....
~ ......, ':\.... , "
1"" \, ..... "'0
... -, \ " ~ .... :>
<.. " . ..... , u
~ " ~ -.: ~ I) );:: '-I Gl
m
r- , ~I <., ~ "- "'--/.
, ~ tJ
, " '- "-
~ '""
n 0 ...
-S;) ......... c: :t: l
Ul )>
W a :D 0
I I ~ \ C) "
-C.. ...j ;c I!!
m 0
(J :D :D N
p, )> m
;c c
.... :::;
--~-- -.-- - -----
~J
."
o
:D
'l:
'"
N
"' m._
./
(')
C
VI
d
s:
m
:JJ
l>
'"'0
"'0
:JJ
o
~
r-
.(')
Ie
VI
-t
10
s:
m
:JJ
,
\
" )
CA:\
G
:--.
\ '
f"",
r-,
.....
"""'
"":-
~
--
,
.. '.
::
,
~
r
,...
-
~
"
\\
--
""
'"'
~
-:-..
~
.....
r--
,.....
"-
-
,
~,
"'"
"
I::
I
"\
"
II.;
--
.....
';),.
-
':
....
~
-
- ,
'"
, '
,
~.
"-
I'J
L_'
n
.....::LG"
::t:..:b..
(J\
z:
oJ';:,
\.J
o
~~
"
L- .
-.
-
.......
~
-../
v
r--,
\:"
""!'\
-....
"\, ~
,-'
t~.".
-..
""
1"""':"'\
<:':
....,
-
-..
7\..'
.-.:...
-'.
<:...
')
"
,...
\:
"
-.J
,
l
~
, ,
1.-'
r-,
'.....
-
~
r--...
-\
(
-.
-,
,"'.
"
(\.
\1~
~~t
);
r,
\ -
o
:;:.
...i
-.
\.' ,
"',
.....
.::---
....
;-
'-
~,
~
\
"
-i
_i
~,
",
.",
,......'
-.!
(",. A
'- ,
~ CJ
.,'"
l"
-
~
-,
-~
-
v
... \
i 1
-I
-.
-u
r"1\
;...1'
-I
,....
'-'
L'
..,..
-
.....
,-,
-
f"I,
1'\
--
~
v
r-
.2'
<-....
..,.
f"',
::\:.,
"i
r--
...
~
b
~.
i\.
~,
r:-:
'-"1
f;
(.:,,~ '..)
hJ ~
\~ -.....:
~ \~
C'
-I
00
"'-:
...
'.
~i
~.'
r-,
"
""\
....
rr,
..\
:'\,
-
""j
'.
-
-c
x
"
"
r-
,
l. '
"'J
.....
-'.)
"\
11',
-"
~
f.
.-
-,
,r'v
,--..
'::
/";'
-i
c~~
"
-:
x
1.:.
"'
..->
-<
.....
,
......
'>
'-
.....
1"\
;--
--
,~'
...
-.
.....
"'-
l'~
I.J
c-
':..
t':
,,\i
~
,
- .
~
~.
~
l\l
~
\, '
<:J
'"
'"
"'\
~
('\
c-
c-
-
'"\
...'
-
-
\.
'":1
~
-
A;
,
\,..'
-I
'U
, ,
\ .
.....
-
'">,
-t~
.......
'-
~
~
f-~J
I I
<;--
C
-,
r-
f",
'I
,.....
-::-::
"
-.
~
1
~
~ 1,'!
>-
-
~
-
"
"-
c.:
-j
A:
::j en
m l>
:: ~
~ en
II II" s::
~:ill; l>
~60 z
(")m
m
"""-
, -
-
~
.,
'"'
-
-;-'\
0> .....0
::DO --
enO ':..
-0"0 ,....
_:tI
06
""m -I
-r..
"O::tI~ '\
:!!!llf;; -
cr--l ~
m>m ~
",,00
m::tl f1\
-'
I--- c.::.
-\,
T"'J
~'.'t
r--,
....
-'
';\,
.....
~
. ~.
~j
'"
;..(.
~........
n n
c: ::I:
'" >-
-l :II
a C)
;;: m
m ?;
:II :II
>- m
;;: c
-l :::;
o
m
en
n
:tI
'6
-t
o
Z
-t
3!
" -t
~ ~
o m
o "T1
m
Z
-t n
"T1 m
I\)
II :tI
)>
~ -t
o m
o en
'0
::;
-t ..,
~ <D
II ~
~'O
i\) ...
01.g
...
iii
-t CD
"T1 ...
./>. III
~.!
0,
o
"0
:>
G)
m
~
o
."
l> 0
"'0 m
"'0 l>
:0 r-
o m
< :0
l>
r:-
o
:>-
-t
m
l,
"C
C"l;l
~Q
~i
g~
(1)2
I-:l:~
2
~
() ()
C 0
en Z
-f -f
o :JJ
s: f)
m -f
:0 )>
:>- 0
"'0 s::
"'0 Z
:0 en
o -f
< :JJ
l> )>
:. d
:JJ
() '-
C 0
en OJ
-t z
o c
s: s::
m OJ
:0 m
:0
\
r_c_
,)
(')
C
en
,-I
'0
~
m
:Il
:l>
"1J
"1J
:Il
o
~
r-
(')
C
en
d
~
m
::J
~
L';
":
1______
,--J
."
o
JJ
s:
'"
..
"
\
-~
r""'
''',
"
.'
, --
"
"i"
"
"
~
,.-...",
'\'
r
<:.
,~,
"",
-'-'
OJ
~
t;(\ ~, <J'
--.
A
"'.
".\'"
'--'
1~
~
,.:;
'"
-,
-
.....
~.
'>'
'"
~
-
-1
~
-,
t.'
.:.
c
~
~
~
~
......
,-....
..,
.....
......
--
n,
.....
'-"
....\
....
~
\\
,
c..
"-
~
f\
~
, ,
."'\
"
'f
,
"-
...
"-
-I
1."\
\'
~
"
.-......
~.
:x
\.._.c
.---
.V
\....,'
Ii,
'7\
-'
!j,
--
"'\
f\:..
~
\
:::;...
D...
"':::':-
<::::
...;
~
'""'
~..
"
-,
....
....
\1"",
-\
t-,
,
-I
Q
N
'-'
("".
"
f"1\
-.
it,
'"
---
()
.....,
V1
t'
......
-
'.
ir..,'-":'
...
...,..
r'-'
r
-,
f'"
-,
,
"
-.
-\
-.
r-
'-
: 'l
~
........,
......
"1-\
"-
o
~
'""
....,
~
'-.:..--
.:----;
r;z
....,
I 'C",.
;>, ,.,.
, ., '\ !"'>\
::' ,-' .-\ ....
.- ~J~:"l, \<<. "'" '-
r-. . Jh ' ,
:....' ,.V."ti:...' _ ;--
('\,)-;. " '. ~ t~ ~ . .J':.-::-
,~.' ':-'l ~
'-1'\ ... -.. \". t;
1 ....... _
tt.
">
:JJ .~
, .\
\. '
-l
\J
~
(7\
\::t
-....
I"J
"
"
....
~
-c.
J.:,
-
.::...
'"'
,
,..,.
\
'-
-\
,....""
-:::- .
l' .
,.
"'-
1..1
~
..
......
r:--...
A
V'
::-4
o
........
"
"
c:
.:'> ');
.. ~ "-
-.j
'"
('
~
CJ
..J
.....
,
~
--
\:
~
o
'-'
I~
~
~-
t
........
~
..,
~-
....
....
~:\
....
--
f'>,
....'
.......
~
'-:,
-.
,"
~
-I
-
,J'\
C'''I'~.l
"-
~
-
-,.
"-
<;::.
-,
.,
'\
,.
"'-
......
.-,
,""
"
"',
,
,~~
"-
,
~
"-
\~
......
I~
I\}
\,...
......
'-
''\
.
~,
....
"-
(I-...
'0
'\
""
.'
~
l..,
",
~ ,.
'". "-
. '"
',,--
-
'j.:"
~-~
....
c,
:.]
....,
( )
..,
.....
.....
~
....
"
......
...
-,
f'\
\
.........
c
m
en
n
:a
;;
-i
o
Z
"
"
"-
~~
"-
K
':-.
......'
,.,
._4"\,
"
'"
"-
"
\....
,..
"\
1-,
........
""-
-..q
1<:1
'"
00
c: x
'" )0
.... :II
o G)
== m
m n
:II :II
)0 m
~ ~
::j
m
3:
:l> 0
'"C m
"U :l>
:0 r-
o m
< ~
:l>
r.
~
.
"
~~
"-
"" 'I
~. "-
~
"I:l
C"'lSl
~Q
~~
~~
~~
Jooi~
2
o
c.
-i
.."
~
o
o
-i
.."
I\J
II
o
o
() ~
c 0
(j) OJ
-I Z
o c
:i: :i:
m OJ
:0 m
:Il
-i
.."
c.>
II
i\>
01
Ll
"1J
:>
G)
m
~
~
,~J
'~l""'Pi"C"""~''''~
,j/' "\
"i;~
N ',\
l }
'l" '.cj"
~~, , .,,",(Ii"
""""'-,,.,,,'"
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE September 3
1991
Staff, Committee,
Comm.
Public Works
\
APPROV~-'" FOR
AGENt A
BY: /
j
AGENDA SECTION
NO,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO.
9,
Utility Maintenance
Person R"nl"('~ment
BY:
James Schrantz
Frank Stone
The City Council is requested to accept our recommendation that
Scott protivinsky be promoted to fi11 the vacancy left by Brian
Kraabel.
We recommend that Scott's wage be increased to $10.60 per hour and
after six months be increased to $11.00 per hour. After a year,
when Scott has learned to run the backhoe and other water related
items, his wage will be increased to $11.40 per hour, the wage
that Brian is currently at.
Frank and I believe Scott wi11 do an excel1ent job for the City
in this position.
COUNCIL ACTION
"-
MOTION BY
l TO
SECOND BY
~~
/'~:"._"o;.,.c,c,,~'_"\\
~~'i'" ;"~,
1.,'1 tl
,J ;;I"
;l\,,,,,.,,,,__,,,,,,,,,,l'
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION
NO. Non-Discussion Items
DATE September 3, 1991
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Finance
ITEM Amend Water Ordinance
NO.
10.
BY:
Howard D. Koolick ~
Finance Director
REQUEST
The Andover City Council is requested to amend Section 30 of
Ordinance 55 which relates to the collection of past due water
user fees.
BACKGROUND
While preparing to certify street lights for the first time, it
was discovered that the ordinance relating to the public water
system (Ordinance ~55) allows the City to assess against the
property water charges in the event a ". . . user fails to pay his
water user fee within a reasonable time following discontinuance
of service. . . ".
In discussing this section of the ordinance with various staff
members, it appears that the City has annually certified
delinquent water charges, but never discontinued water service for
a property simply because they have not paid their quarterly bill.
Water is discontinued when a property owner requests it be shut-
off. Usually these circumstances involve HUD or mortgage
foreclosure properties.
The proposed amendment would eliminate the following phrase from
Section 30~ ".. . following discontinuance of service (a time
period not to exceed ninety (90) days) . . .". This amendment
would not affect the City's right to discontinue service, only
delete the requirement that service be discontinued prior to
certification.
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
'-- TO
SECOND BY
u
~)
CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS
1. Approve the proposed amendment.
2. Do not approve the proposed amendment and request staff to
begin shutting off service for all delinquent properties.
3. Table this item pending additional information from staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approving the proposed amendment to Ordinance 55.
This would bring the ordinance in line with current practice.
Having to discontinue service for a delinquent account will add a
significant workload to both the Utility Billing Clerk and the
Public Works Department without generating a material amount of
additional revenue. In addition, discontinuing or notifying a
resident that water service will be discontinued will build ill-
will towards the City from its residents.
C)
'\
o
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 551
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 55, KNOWN AS THE MUNICIPAL
WATER SYSTEM ORDINANCE.
The City Council of the City of Andover hereby ordains:
Ordinance No. 55 is amended as follows:
Section 30 - Action to Collect Charges
In the event a user fails to pay his water user fee within a
reasonable time fe!!ew~R~-a~aeeRt~R~aRee-ef-aeFY~ee-+a-t~me-~eF~ea-
Ret-te-eHeeea-R~Rety-+9G+-aaya+, said fee shall be certified by
the City Clerk and assessed against the property on which the
charges have incurred, and forwarded to the County Auditor for
collection.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Andover this 3rd
day of
September , 1991.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
victoria volk - City Clerk
()
';:'>~(<""""'.~"'~""'\\
.' o.ill.
~.'i...'.. .'\)}
fr :n
:~~\, J
1", l'
""~~. /
"'~~tlPJ:~.-"_~~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 3, 1991
ITEM
NO.
II,
Award Bid/91-10
Engineering $'
BY: Todd J. Haas
APPRp-,vt D FOR
AGE~DI\~
.y)~
/
AGENDA SECTIQN .
NQ Non-Dlscusslon
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution accepting
bids and awarding contract for the improvement of Project No. 91-
10 for street construction in the area of 159th Lane, Swallow
Street, Quinn Street.
The lowest 3 bids are as follows:
Central Landscaping, Inc.
GMH Asphalt Corporation
W.B. Miller, Inc.
$93,298.00
94,672.00
96,788.00
The low bid is 12% below the feasibility report construction
estimate.
MOTION BY
! TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
,~
.... a- U> ... '" N I~
-.J
'""
0
;.... ;;:l Cl
>= 9 (1 ;;:l (1 ;;:l ~
~ " " 2 n " >
~ ;; 3 3 [ " [ '"
:T :T
" ~ :T ;], en I~
~ 15 5' "
" c; <n c; ~
9 " <n
.~ " Z S ::; ~ a
~ " " ::; "
" !!. " " ;:
0" " s go !A ~
.., 5' "
" ~
" ,. <n
0' 0: }1 ::;
" ~ "
.., ~ !A
" ~'
.., " 0
" "" ~
3 " ".
" 0:
'" P "
:T
a
H~C~
f. n~go
H H~~
3 ti:: g
t::l ":l ":l
s: ., .,
.g. .g,
0 a a
ii
1:1 Z Z
5' P ..
~ 8
(>
- '0 -
0 ';"' VI
8 '0
- ?
0
?' t"'"
Jl ..
::l
"
(') z
b .~
i:Il
":..., (I'J
~
'"r1 eo.
~ ~
c.:
~ ~
> ~
(>
c: ~
0<1
c: l':>
~
tv 0
.'" c:
5'
- ::l
~ ~
- ~
(>
~
~
~
"
~
0 :n -
~ " 3
"'::l
" Z "'
"' p 0
<:
"
3
> - "
..... :!.
::l -
c.. VI '"
0 0
<:
"
."'
:s:
5'
"
"
on
0
0;
"Cl
~;;-
"
z"
p i'I
'O1"l
"'0
"'0
"-F
="
;'I
., -
" "..
"::l (>
.., .,
~&
&'!i
g 2-.
s.~
s:~
~-
., ;.
B [;;'
:e. [;;'
?-~
8
~
- - :::; c: - - - - - - '" CD I~
::: '" CD '^ .... .... N - '"
'^
'"
~ ..J "l "l ~ CIl CIl - - 2:l ~ 2:l > >
0 8- " "l "l 00 00
'= n n " e e
~ "- 00 00
0 0 ;:;' ~. n n 8 3 '" "
" " " 5' i: i: .... " I~
n n :;. 00 5' 5' 00 00
'" " n - " "
I::l n ... .t 0 ol! 0 (i (i
<) ;; <> ~ .", .", " "
> ~ ~. ~. ~ ~ ~ 0- 0-
CIl n ~ (; 8 '" 3 " "
0 ~ (; ~ ~
t:1 ~ " n !'l: n " .l' ....
~ ~ 1l .", " 0 ;;
t:l ~ @: "
'" <' " ;,. p n
~ " & 0 " 01
Cl ~ '< " ... !!. or
" ;l 0' ... '^ t:
" '" 8 0' ~ '^
,,' .. "-
"- 3 :I,
:I. e '"
'" '" ,,' ~
~ ... e
'" ':i
':i ...
~
CIl CIl C- CIl > t:l C- :i :i 2! 2! 2!
"r1 "':1 "':1 -< n > "':1 I~
'" - '"
... ..., '8 '" N v. N ~ f<
'^ g :3 N N ~ ....
'" '" N "., '" '" '"
n=
u. ... -
" '"
"0 I~ ~ _~z
:3 -.J U. - - :;:."
.... .... '" '" '" '" u. CD -.J '^ n - g -?
'" '" 8 !:o '" '" 8 8 '" 8 '" ;.., .. - . \;'-
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '^
"
"-
.... 11
'" ~ <; -
'''' CD N "., '^ '""
N 00 '"., .... "8 v. ';;: N ~ V. -..., 00 -..., I~ 5'
'" :3 g g :3 ~ ~ ~ 8 u. 00
'" '" '"
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Cl=
- ;::==
~ N u. I=: ~ ::z
:3 N .... ~
..> .'" :...> N '" '" N '^ -.J -.J -.J ~~
;~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" u. 8 '" 8 n -
.. -
<:> '" <:> '^ <:> 0 '" '" 0 '" :a.
.... J:
'" N N - :: 5'
.... <:> '^ :...> 0 -
"' v. ...... - V. "., - u. "f v. ~ ~ ~ Ii p
-.J -.J :3 u. :3 8 8 N ~
N '^ 0 0 0 -.J
'" '" 8 8 '" '" 8 '" 8 8 8 8 8
0 0 0 0 0
:<:=
.'" ' '"
"0 - I""~ ?z
8 u. '^ - 15
.... .... N N '^ CD '" u. -.J C. ;"" ;::~
8 '" 8 8 '" 8 8 8 '" 8 8 b: " - :t..6
.. -
'" '" 0 ...
0'"
.... 5'
'" N .~ - - p
c- o '" '" - '"
-..., '.... "' IV '0 V. - .... ~ u. -;., "' -..., I~
'" '^ '" 0 :3 :3 '" '" N 00 '^
'" '" 0 0 0 '" 0 '" 0 0
'" 8 8 '" '" 8 '" '" 8 8 8 8 8
0 0 '" '" 0
~=
.... if""
N - I""~ .. z
:3 '" - .... - ~ ;on?
.... '''> N '" 0 .... u. u. CD -.J :s."
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 :., 8 '" 8 n - p 0 ...
'" u. '" .. - "
~
.... ~
0 !::l fj - !::l ~
- - t: ... - N 0'
-..., W N 8 "0 .... N -;., W "0 ~ I~ "
'" '^ :3 0 :3 '" ~ :3 .... -.J ....
'.... '" '" 0 '" '^ '"
8 8 8 '" 8 '" 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
0 0
'2:=
o -
..... - ;l""
N I~~ ".z
... .... '" 0 0 ~ ... - N C. ;- ,; $I'
- '" '" '" u. 0 CD :s."
;.., ;.., 8 g; 8 8 8 8 ~ 8 8 .... " - p ~ '"
<:> 0 '" .. -
.... ~
,_J '""
0 fj - - ".
.... - - 'c- ... '" - CD ~
N 00 8; c- oo -.J .... '" 00 ":::J -;., -;., '8 Ii
N 8 :3 :3 :3 :3 N :3 15 N
0 ... '" 0
8 '" 8 '" 8 8 8 8 '" :3 8 8 8
0 '" '"
-
..,
VI
:=>
:;
'"
." .; N 0 > ;.! = ." ("l ("l =
= ~ .;' '" ..., ~ = ~ 0:
~ 'i" ~ '" ;' ~ i1
z "2. ("l ~ =' =
? ; &. CIl ~ '" ~ 0
5' ~ =' =
= ~ F 'g ~ ,'"
~
: F
""' ""' VI 61 .... -< t:ll (') :n
C\ 0.. VI W
.... .... 0 ... 0- ~r 0 C> <
tv tv ~ C> VI cr ::l C>
'-' '-' -
'" VI (') ...
.... .... - "':I 2!. "':I
0- ~ r t"" ... :r 0
.... OJ C> c:.: t"" ...
'" '" n
00 ~ :>I'" :>I'" ~ 0 OJ 0
0
&l .... .C> C> ::l ::l ::l
W 0 ::I 0- -
0 :::: - '"
... Q
5' :r
C> "0
::I 5'
C>
'" g<l
0
- ...
OJ ::l
r>
'0 '0 VI ~ .... -< Cl Cl "T1
w w VI -.J
VI VI W 0 ~r OJ :: :;;'
0. 0. .... .... ..:l 0
VI ::l OJ :r:
0 OJ C> "':I :r: "':I
-.J .... - '" ... > n
.... 0 0 OJ C> OJ ...
" Co '" ... '" n
". ~ a "::l "
P Co :r a
0- 0 '" ~
:: :E a
0 (')
S' 0
::l 0- 0
...
C> -l ';:l
'"
0 :"
0;
J>o J>o VI ;.0 .... "':I ~ ~ "T1
tv J>o VI OJ C\ ... :;;'
...., ';" w 3 -.J " ~
1- :=> C\ '" 0
.... w '" VI ~ 0;'
8 w 0 3 ~ "':I
.... ';<' ~ 0 C>
VI J>o a ...
:: !" " n
... "
::l ;' ~ .... a
::l ~ ...
0 ::l
'" ... 0- r>
0 " ...
0; II
J>o J>o VI 0 "':I "':I -l > "T1
~ ~ VI '" 9 ... 3' S' :;;'
:..> '" C>
00 00 C\ 0 :!!. 0 C> C>
'0 '0 ~ ,0 t:ll 0- s:- ... "':I
.'
...., OJ " " (') 0
w OJ :: a '< ...
>< 0 n
3' w > ::l C>
::l C\ S' ~ ::l
VI ... -
0 0 c:
'" ... II
"
0; o'
.::l
...
::l
r>
" .
:t- ~ VI '" .... '" 0 z on
VI :r .... C>
VI Y' w OJ VI n 0 0 :;;'
. ~ :>I'" .... ... ::l ;:1. C>
.... .... 0 C> OJ :r
~ 8 "::l (') S' s: :E "':I
C>
C\ W C> 0 :3. C> ...
.!' c: t:ll '" n
::I - C>
:: .:< -l "':I > a
...
S' ;.0 C> ~ '"
OJ "::l
::l 0 '" ... :r
C> OJ c: ... .~
'" ... C>
0 0- " ....
0; .... ....
...
OJ ::l
" ,
t:ll
a:
~
,..
o
t:ll
a:
z
p
N
,;...
t:ll
~
Z
?
w
t:ll
~
z
p
....
t:ll
a:
z
o
VI
'-...J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
~J
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF PROJECT NO. 91-10 FOR Street
CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA OF 159th Lane, Swallow Street, Quinn
Street N.W.
WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids as set out in
Council Resolution No. 111-91 , dated July 16, 1991 , bids were
received, opened and tabulated according to law with results as
follows:
1. Central Landscaping, Inc.
2. GMH Asphalt, Inc.
3. W. B. Miller, Inc.
$93,298.00
$94,672.00
$96,788.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover to hereby accept the bids as shown to indicate
Central Landscaping, Inc. as being the apparent low bidder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TO HEREBY direct the Mayor and City Clerk
to enter into a contract with Central Landscaping, Inc. in the
amount of $93,298.00 for construction of the
improvements; and direct the City Clerk to return to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the
successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until
the contract has been executed and bond requirements met.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
City Council at a
and adopted by the
meeting this
day of
, 19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of
the resolution, and Councilmen
voting
against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
ATTEST:
'.,
',-~
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
(J
.,,<~,"'/C'"""."""'\".
ii 1!.
:1; j
'" I
'1~_ ...r;P'
"""'"......",,/
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 3, 1991
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Non-Discussion items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
ITEM
NO.
Accept Petition/North-
glen Area BY:
--1f.4Y
Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution declaring
the adequacy of petition and ordering the preparation of a
feasibility report for the Northglen 2nd, 4th & 5th Addition area
(area in blue) for street light installation" Project 91-24.
Total number of lots that benefit from street lights in the
Northglen area is 193.
Number in favor of street lights 107
Number against street lights 23
Number available 63
NOTE: If a property signed the petition but did not give an
address it was considered unavailable. (Yes 3, No 5)
MOTION BY
J
'-' TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
~J
',_J
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANORA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS OF STREET LIGHTING
, PROJECT
NO. 9l-24IN THE NORTHGLEN 2ND, 4TH & 5TH ADDITIONS AREA.
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition, dated
August 26 , 19~, requesting the construction of
improvements; and
WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to contain the
signatures of more than 35% of the affected property owners
requesting such improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover that:
1. The petition is hereby declared as adequate.
2. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to AEC
and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a
feasibility report.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
day of
Council at a
meeting this
19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
...j
R E eEl v ED'
i r AIj;;-;:-19~
-,,-..
"~
CITY of ANDOVER
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
N 0 ~Th (;-1 tI' 1"\
.
S u.. h A : v .' ~ ,\ a n..
do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved by
Construction of City STr e.e...T J "J. j, T~
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER
ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
YES
NO
_\ ~~\l i'!"
.~~<;)~~
/
/
'_/
.;
This petition was circulated by: du';.e,.
Address: ~1 c:; '1 I VI 01/" Ave. tJ.'"J _ T
5rh roeder
y
YES- 1\ No -0
1-CO""Q\f\tfV' ( cd '-
/'
R' ECEIVED
.. r AUG 2619911.
,-
",-)
CITY of ANDOVER
.1
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
Nor1~ r;!efl
5vbd; vi;::; "01}
do hereby petition that_said ~ortion of said area be improved by
Construction of City ~ 5k~ \ ""J\"-1-n
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
bo
~..~",~
I'
This petition was
Address: ':1 7 Co, "
(0.
,.
...1 t'",""
,...." '
~
"-
J
/'
~-)
CITY of ANDOVER
D E CElli ED
fir ~Ii~ 2 6 19;;1
, '.
CITY OF' ANDOVER
Date:~( ~I
:3
No.
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
't\~~\<t~ SdoG':,j\~\n'\\
do hereby petition that sa~d~:ti?n ~f said area be improved by
Construction of City ~~ 0 ~ \ '~'\J:'b
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
'\
'-)
ADDRESS
, NO ,
This petition was circulated by:
Address: -; 7 9"( 0 -0.. ve NI.A/
/
T
:)
,~
CITY of ANDOVER
U Ee-flV ED:' I (
nj"41JG 2619911 .
~- ,
Date:
5/22/q/
.
4
;,
i;;
No.
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
Nor-lhcftq ~~( )bdt f~ OI\~
do hereby petition that s~d portion of said area be improved by
Construction of City <)~ \\~~0JUD
and that the
property, as
cost of said improvement be assessed against the
authorized1bYichapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
OWNER DRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION YES
./
~171 /'Iou. fl,. p,Uv
"'1 g ~--..
benefiting
NO
/
/
?
v
2-, ~.
,. ..~~ ..
l. ~\ ~ L c-
/
I
/
771-1
'3 ~'1 ~
/V 7.1... -1 (.~
I ((f)!'" ~
J'-~,- t l
,.Lv
I (,f(j -
,J
,>(
\<::.
\ \
Q
\J ~~ ~..~7i
\' ~ 'l
""~;v ;J\; ,
.,l 'I<~'
/ r \,
\..,__fi..c_ --......
X
'\...;
,',
/
,
,
)
'-.
-~
"
I
.I
This petition was
Address: '3 7 S q
--'-~
""""'-c
~......,;p
) (t~) ~
circulated by: ~It~ 5;.ArrJpJe.r~5~'W\. cad,-
It-{ Ct.b A \Ie:. MI I'
.'.,. ~~
I
:x:.
-:,
.-----------.------. - ----
:~
O-El;-ElV-ED' '
nr AUG261;l.
~-
CITY of ANDOVER
""TV r.r- '-, .__
Gentlemen:
Date:
5/~/q (
:vs'
No.
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
, ),Jc:r-t\f)~~q.D ~~\'\fy~(\~\ms
do hereby petition that ~~d porti?n of said area be improved by
Construction of City ,~(tr~ \ \~\f)~
.\W
.... :.
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
~ :1j.,~'0>c( Sctc~' L I(t'-(..{ sf
/'fo-a5 \. (,dM 5t, NtJ
3 S t:lj }C frl /I/W
I \j 0) iF- 2..n:c Sf, tJ l.J
/
SIGNATORE OF-OWNER
. :<. '
,jr;\/1/?/ 1 ..,LA' 't..(
/ I
) '~,
,'J ~
tI~' ~q."'~J, (
i"\1 ,)~
./ -.:::: /~ ;.. c/ Ii
'\
,-)
"'
ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
YES
}>(
~o I,.
'59:1. (,it(('("//s":'
J1q~cr . ("r -+
.+
.~... ',~
":,
f/
'\..
"""
i~ Ji
i ,.,
'. ,"
of-
'"
.. ~.
y
"
\..
'\
, '~
This petition was circulated by: :s\)\\~
Address: '"37SQ II../O~ Ave, N\jV.
f~,- 5"'-
* \\~~~c \~l ~
I
I
:!
,;
j'
'. .~
,~ 0
,
..
I
~ !
,.
,~ ttlf
~; /
1'0 "
DEC-f~VED
j \r;;G 2 61991l
,-
CITY of ANDOVER
""""" ,.,~ .
Date:
6/S/~/
Co
/'
No.
Gentlemen:
We, the
area:
undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
i\ I 'Q. \~ A . ' 0
\ \l(jK~()cjQf\ ~)~ )\J'\ \\ ~ \ ~D~
do hereby petition that~~i~_porti?~ O~d area be improved by
Construction of City ~q:\- j\~
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefitins
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
SIGNATURE OF OWNZR
ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
YES
NO
w
This petition was circulated by:
Address: .." 7 <; q It-{ or> Ave.. NW
"
CITY of ANDOVER
:...." E C~ r" -. .,~ '~D.'
' iP ,I ., fi'"
R .:.:-' · _<..1
~ 'r g:;(~ 2619911
" .
. '\
"0
""'" I I \JI '"\1 ~ '."i;.j" ".
~}f))q/
".
Date:
'I
,.
:!
No.
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
\\'rr\\:\~~~ ~
~~'c<:\\ \\I~\Of\6
do hereby petition that sai~~ortio~ of said area be improved by
Construction of City C2tf'(l<it \\<j'n~
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
,
o
DESCRIPTION
YES
NO
v
r~
v
This petition was circulated by: -1J\f ~ <{ ~lJlo
Address: 37S'1 1L-i<;C.~ Ave.. NyJ.
\
/
\
\J
CITY of ANDOVER
,-
CITY OF' ANDOVER
Date:
6/ <;/C( j
~
I
!
No.
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
"'\r~\ ~. \0',
~ \ \ r--JU.'f\ \. )\J'oc] \ \1 \ 0\ erf)
g~n~~~~ii~~t~;i~t~hat S~~\\~id area he improved hy
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
~J
DESCRIPTION
NO
This petition was circulated
Address: -; 75'" \1..1() ~ Ave,
, v~~
hy, f,l;~ 4--- ~l\Oi\Cc.oA~Z
rJ\;J
! "
.:~0
.
;1
.';
Ir
i,
! )
'/
,
fJEtE'Vf8'
~,-- .
n i AUG 26 1991 1 "
',-
ITY of ANDOVER
CI
Date: 7/rr /~ I
No. q
Gentlemen:
We, the
area:
=dersigned. owners ,~erty ,in ,the following
1\C'rm~CU1 n . _ _ \~\ ~ \'?N"'P
descri!Jed
do hereby petition that ~,d porttor of said area be improved by
Construction of City ..ut('t OO;:;t l~~f)
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
NO
/
,
~This petition was circulated by:
'\ ~5C1...h .I\.'
\ress: '31 '{ iLfO.... v2 ,V-v'\),
5 ,.-"
:i~U
"
"
. ~
~,J
~ I
'J'
;
,
"!
i
i
,
i
.
I
~
i
j)
, .
,
i
j
I
~
1
\
; .~-~
I
I
I '
;'
",
U Era: I1jf r
hrAI!G-2 61~911U
/-
CITY of ANDOVER
~'" v ''''""vv:''"
Date: 7'//5/9'/
No. (Q
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real prcperty in the following described
area:
1\~\H] ~~),Ai\~~A"f\-.Q
do hereby.petitio~ that s~~ortien\Pf\~~area be improved by
Construct~on of C~ty ~QO~ _\~~
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
"-
,
.~
ADDRESS
LEGAL
NO
/
/
1,-1
by: "JU\~-e.
NW,
'-, This petition was circulated
"-
'\..ddress: "3759 Il-(O~ Av/l.
"
l
~
'I '
, 'I
ti
,
"
',' '\
"V
CITY of ANDOVER
o Efi~-rVEn
'. . "" ~ 1,
i \ /.l,I)\) 2 0 1991 I
~-
"mOVER
Date:
"//";;Z3/CJ/
\ \
,
'I
~ !
"
No.
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
N~Q(\ ~W\\\\~\CJ~
,
"
i
, I
,
, "
,
!
do hereby petition that~~i~po~t~~n of said area be improved by
Construction of City ~ <;J,:,! .i\tf>~
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
j j
ADDRESS
NO
.
i
I
,
i
J
1
1
i
I
! '\
J,--)
.
!
I
t
i
This petition was circulated by: ~Ulle,
Address: 3751 IL-IO~ A"p. M~;. T
---->,,--
:..'J\..'.
I I l I -
, I H~50f;5. 1. ~
, . ::.JO .. .... . ,
~' I.' L
-1 . \((.!o,Ui!!! .
-, , ~l: ~Z.: -;-
; ~ Ie 'L~~ '---
i...J. . ,t..rER~j ~
. OJ ~-I ~ ,
:-... -" , .
i;"'~ '[)EHi/~IJ.t
. . Ann .
::~"""'i .,~:.
[iii 'N.A.
. ,:' ~S, !('.l{ :;':'(-. \i
.
~- "" .... . I
'-,-
0,
2'
~J
."!i' -' ~ - ~. , ,0 ,.,
- -.> ~'I- . - ~ ~ -'- - I.
. ..: ,Ii .~., M ~H.C ~.!.s ,h~ . i ~
~, 'B" I Ie ";Jf!/,':t ~
~_t_:... 0: . ~ ~ - , I r..L........- "'T-fffi-::'- ~~.~
. =- 1 I ...' ,.. ..
_ . _ - . ~ J 4/~ _',
__________ - I 't;
;1 I' ~..DLEC'I;' '~.
.. .. :~
'_I.tND.!I;.I~Da~)f-.; -
-;- I"' "fOr.:.:
. ~-
I :- ~;:.~~ \
p rsr . tl"'
~~ I ~79tr..:- '17~>CX;kOMI'I'~~
~ " I -I. ADO/TlON .. .~-
-L .j.r. -,- _~.
""",T
H , .,.....'ij~
9 rl':':'7i1':l~' A. "'J..'l ~ ' 'I" ./.1. t'
P"::;- ).!lj I ;Of., ~.....; .. ""-:7\
~.' , ). ~
~.'!~ }~,.T,'!,~~,,~ -', ;, ./ L. .'~'I' 5 ~ ~ 8+1
, ~ '. B J ~ ~;"l':" !'\:J' .
F-~~'~ '..42~. .,'?...I' .,..~ ~\: t:i ~:... r..:;./.,. ,
J L- ~. .",. I , -:- P:c..... .
...!l;' "! rr ilQi? '(G, Eo '.Ii' .,...."..!......!.. ~ ~~~. - -"/-1'" . .
.~. . .~- . :o.,,", ~~ HII . m.",," .
-}- I.!. i . n. 'g,2OJ'J" . "'\:;l'''' · ~~~ ~va- ;!;~GE~ 2:
;Y' n,. " , '1: . . , . ". OF' \ i ~i!l Jr~ - !t{~I;;1 .;-..;.! T';'Ti73
I "'..." .~
\ #'t2'" ~ · . tl,. t::7:1.3:1 .. .. . I
.10 I t-Hl. , """i" t 13.
\1.""11 rT""Tlt7r;- ....,.-;-- l%~
~1Ill-:.~ .... T:":;
..,,, .Tf. tl 'I. I ~ ~ . , I I ll~
. m ~ ~ -;-1:2: wai,
"vITt:::! ~ I _ ~ ... 3 ~
. . · ::? ~ \.l::r: -;-n- r;ti1;
I~ ~ 1:=1*.,...
~ ~ 4 i4
i
.
~
.
,/
,
I
~p I
I
(X)fJNTY ROAD NO. 116
I ,
I
.4IST "V .W
,~1ER
d'CI.,...
".!"...
{~~
E'D
3b
~".c L
~. olL1i z I
. ',iA"<>1T/ON I
fI' -- I J . ~~
L-.w , :~
~ "=""~'.!,! .'...~I r-~/~! ;'
CHANAN.'s 1:11 CrMpMAN~ I ~). I
....; ,fHtt ~./II ~o tIfWII.'1 ".1" Z
....'.,'.L'.l.,.~-1"..t.!.J III' ~
II: ~l,:':'~tt;'~'~ :.J'U w "
I )... CHA:1GW1 CH:H IfN~, r-I ~)I:V ~J
~.tIII~ ~u.1 ~.1!l!J ~"" ~
- . ;E . ."
].;: "~BC),~4Aiil '''';',~ [:Eoc
"0 .~.
,,_ '.1:' 111;;;";;-0 ,l!. '.
~ ,j.I~ ., '~:';k' AL'i
:t:K! ',\'COC' 1'1/
.,..... (; , .
. Ir~~~"OIA:Z !
~m!I . t~ll"i>J!JIi'7it/ -0' .
:0,0 "". ~ ~i'~ A~'
":' \0, ~:~l...I J~r. ~~'-r-1 ~ 4TH "
..' Illl!~-:Hll.Ul 7J!:~""
,. ~AY.~"" H~flliM=
l'ltt"'!
.;
8(1<
ZO.
.J.
VINT~COollT
..
/2./
.~~
3-fb
~~
Ir
SHADED AREA DENOTES
PARK AREA
NUMBERING SYSTEM
, ",
" )
.- "
<-~
l~i""i"''''~~'~''''''\\
~J ~
,,'i F'.
(l,., II
~ il
~ if
,,"
""'-.<ll"
~""'~""'~~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION .
NQ Non-Dlscusslon Items
DATE
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
September 3, 1991
Engineering
"11\\
APPR6v~D FOR
AG-J;~
\1:>
j)
BY:.L
.J
ITEM
NO.
/3.
Schedule Joint Meeting
with Park Comm.
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to schedule a special joint meeting
with the Park and Recreation Commission.
Possible dates are as follows:
- 3rd week of September, either the 16th or 18th
- 4th week of September, either the 23rd or 25th
- 1st or 2nd week of October
The Park and Recreation Commission would like to discuss the
following items with the City Council:
1. Park parking lot requirements
2. Softball tournament fee schedule
3. 1992 Capital budget
4. Kelsey-Round Lake Park
5. Other misc.
MOTION BY
. "-
.....,j TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
(~
....':.......;....,.,:i..:.'~:j"./"..~''''''''.\\
q ~
;\I
'"'.
,.",
"",,
.,~~:~
-
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE
September 3, 1991~
\
~EM Remove Stop Signs/Old
0./1. Constance & Univ.
Engineering
~
APPR6'lB~\ FOR
AGE\~~
BY:
AGENDA SECTION .
NO. Non-Dlscusslon Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the removal of the north
and southbound stop signs on University Avenue at the
intersection of Old Constance Boulevard.
The eastbound stop sign on Old Constance Boulevard at University
Avenue will remain in place.
TJH:vv
Attach.
MOTION BY
/~
'-- TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
'\
V
CITY OF HAM LAKE
15544 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E.
HAM LAKE. MINNESOTA 55304
43+9555
August 21, 1991
James Schrantz
Administrator
City of Andover
1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 55304
Dear Jim:
Recently, the Ham Lake Road Committee went on an inspection
and noticed that the stop signs on University Avenue and Old
Crosstown Blvd. are still in place. We would like to have
the north and south stop signs on University Avenue at this
intersection removed, with the stop sign on Old Crooat.o\.n
Blvd. remaining in place. ~."{'"-o:e
Please let me know what the position of the City of Andover
is regarding these signs.
Sincerely,
LtL~
Doris A. Nivala
Administrator/Clerk/Treasurer
, )
o
172ND AVE.. ,"jW--
171ST AVE. NW
170TH AVE. NW
169TH AVE. NW
<3 168TH AVE. NW
~
OUNTT RO"O .. .60
-.. -..
-.. -..
-.. -..
-.. -..
.,--J
167TH AVE. NW
166TH AVE. NW
2
13
165TH AVE. NW
164TH AVE. NW
'o~
y'{t/
-(.IJ.fI'
AVE. NW
162NO AVE. NW
161ST AVE. NW
160TH AVE, NW
159TH AVE. NW
158TH AVE. NW
157TH AVE. NW
[56TH AVE, NW
j
I,
I'
[
,.;:
.'
I..
:
,J
~~..'..?"""'~..''''.''CIo!~r
(~r.)
'\ -"i
t~f,'
~~;~'>;lrr~~~;~~
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE Sep~ember 3. 1991
ITEM
NO.
I?~
Accept Petition/
Lund's 2nd-4th
-1%
APPROV,~OR
AG"C6(j
BY: .1.
l!
AGENDA SECTIQN .
NO. Non-Dlscusslon Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
BY: Todd J. Haas
The City Council is requested to approve the resolution
declaring the adequacy of petition and ordering the preparation
of a feasibility report for Lund's Evergreen Estates 2nd - 4th
Additions, Project 91-23, for street lights. See attached
petition and map of area to be considered (area in blue) for
street light installation.
Lund's Evergreen Estates 5th Addition currently has street
lights.
Total number of lots that benefit from street lights in Lund's
Evergreen Estates 2nd-4th Additions - 42.
Number in favor of street lights - 29
Number against street lights - 0
Unavailable - 13
TJH:v
Attach.
MOTION BY
. "-
'-../ TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
~,)
CITY of ANDOVER
E C- l;" ~ !\;l' .~ ,
P . .,1 t
. ,. ~
'I _1" .,
l-l
j
'-
Da e:
CITY OF ANDOVER
No.
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved by
Construction of City
-".
l> LfTC-/,v ~
STRE'C/
L/~#TS
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
,.J
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
YES
NO
ADDRESS
?
.c
This petition was circulated by:
Address: ,;; c; rl::,..
"'~
, ...Q/'
~)
'1ECFPJEO
~ ~ _' ~iI
CITY of ANDOVER ! l'
jo'l ,n , 1 "
,~'-d;I~2o_991 I'
i
,-
Dat CITY OF ANDOVER
",.
No.
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved by
cons~~t~o;I;;ity 57;e~eT L./a-#'/~
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
"-
)
ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
.
This petition was circulated by: ~ ~
Address: ;;2 C/"!:? .4 r:; ~ /1 V A/ UI
,
7j'"3~ f;4n
YES
NO
v
V-
;.,/
v-
~
v€!"'
...........-
1'<0. '.:
~
;;
" "-
o
CITY of ANDOVER
E ('-1 r ~ ,,-~ POD" .
. . ~ r. ;; ~J J.2~...
~v ~ "(:::J/ ~ ~
_'_ ,I
'\I :\, 0' ,..
. ... - ...
,-
CITY ('IF ^ ~!b)Q\/ER
No.
Gentlemen:
We, the undersigned, owners of real property in the following described
area:
do hereby petition that said portion of said area be improved by
Construction of City
?J....t1-f:..l y G 577RfCt=T /-18 ffT<
and that the cost of said improvement be assessed against the benefiting
property, as authorized by Chapter 429, Laws of Minnesota.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER
ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
NO
v
"
" )
This petition was circulated by: ~~~ ~~
Address: .;;2017'3 /6;::;-TE- II-.v Nt1)
-
--....., .....-....
yc~ HiD \
I,..E. .
.3_ _
A TF S ~ oJ
z 2 .1
I 2 I .13 ""
i
I /I
z .12 2
rEe 3 12
."
, c --.., .1 32 6 I
. }
I
I ' II i.U~D:S Z
,,'It
33
;..
z
::>
o
...
2
T
6
'7' 0
o
V
6(\J
-
-
."
,.,
/'
5
2
I;
~oD..J
I
2
I
9 10
16 15
..
$.
6
$
OUTUlT A
~
z
,. -,....
-- - ...~.
, . COUNTY STATE 1.'0 HIGHWAY HO.ZO
.~ ..
'-12- I.,~> S""~H'r-
z
'"''
""ruRAL ~"S
, (CE"rERV ifF)
""
'!!I
PI.. '''IE
. -,~...-
...~ "' .
'~.:;i?;,~:.:{t~:.
. . ......
!'.
:; .~.- ~~~.'.~~~:.;.'
.-'"
i
I ,
r
-.."
. ....
....:....
- '-.' -' - ..
~~1~r:
..' -. . - .
. ~ ..
u
CITY OF ANDOVER
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RES. NO.
MOTION by Councilman
to adopt the following:
A RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS OF STREET LIGHTING
, PROJECT
NO. 91-23 IN THE LUND'S EVERGREEN EST. 2ND-4TH ADDITIONS AREA.
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition, dated
August 26 , 19~, requesting th~ construction of
improvements; and
WHEREAS, such petition has been validated to contain the
signatures of more than 35% of the affected property owners
requesting such improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Andover that:
1. The petition is hereby declared as adequate.
2. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to AEC
and they are instructed to provide the City Council with a
feasibility report.
MOTION seconded by Councilman
and adopted by the City
day of
Council at a
meeting this
19 , with Councilmen
voting in favor of the resolution, and Councilmen
voting against, whereupon said resolution was declared passed.
CITY OF ANDOVER
ATTEST:
Kenneth D. Orttel - Mayor
Victoria Volk - City Clerk
~
;f"~';"""""~'''~.''''''\.'\
;; 1\
~ ~
u \,'" t;~)
o'~~~"..1'b
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE SeD>cember 3
1991f\
\ I
Engineering
AP,~VE tSFOR.
AG.,Nr 1'(
"-
BY: V
AGENDA SECTION
NQ Non-Discussion Items
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
ITEM
NO. Approve Change Orde r
/1. *5/Fire Station
BY: James E. Schrantz
\
The City Council is requested to approve the attached Contract
Change Order *5 for fire stations in the amount of $1,001.00.
JES:v
Attach.
MOTION BY
/ '
TO
COUNCIL ACTION
SECOND BY
"
JtJJ 8on~s troo Owner City of Andover, 1685 NW Crosstown Blvd, Andover, MN 55304 Date August 28, 1991
Rosm~
i\]; Andtrllk & Contractor Maertens-Brenny Construction, 8251 Main St NE, Mpls, MN 55432 Change Order No. S
Arsocl.ltes
--- Bond Co. Alexander & Alexander, Attn. Meredith Shian, PO Box 1360, Mpls, MN 55440
lr........~
'0
CHANGE ORDER NO. S
;
I'
,.
I
i
I
t'
f'
.
l'
Andover Fire Stalion Nos. 1 & 2
M-B Project No. 863
File No. 17130
.
I,
.
I
Description of Work
This change order provides for the addition of telephone outlet boxes with conduit to the Electrical Room from Doors 102A and
119A at Fire Station No.1 and Door 103B at Fire Station No.2. This change order also covers the electric service change to high
pressure air compressor. This change was required because of single phase power at Fire Station No.2.
Contrart Unit Total
No. lIem Unit Quanllly Price Amount
1 Add weatherproof telephone outlet boxes LS 1 689.00 689.00
2 Change electric service to high
pressure air compressor LS 1 312.00 312.00
Total Change Order No.5 $1,001,00
I.
I
f
Original Contract Amount
Previous Change Orders
This Change Order No. 5 - ADD
Revised Contract Amount (including this Chang.e Order)
$
1,037,391.00
62,423.95
1,001.00
1,100,815.95
~'
$
Recommended for Approval by:
BONEsTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK& ASSOCIATES, INC.
_~y(2f-'-~
;,
I'
f:
Approved by Owner:
CITY OF ANDOVER, MN
.
)
Dnlc:
;-
Distrihlltion
1 Owner'
1 - Contr~~tor
c.'c'qr.3(~1
August 27, 1991
Dear City Official:
I wish to extend a cordial invitation to attend the League of Minnesota Cities' regional
meeting hosted by the City of Lakeville Monday, September 30, at Brackett's Crossing Country
Club, 17976 Judicial Road. We believe the LMC has saved the best for the last regional meeting
of 1991.
The afternoon program will begin at 2:30 p.m. and conclude at 5 p.m. It will focus on
personnel issues, including pay equity/comparable worth, veterans preference in hiring and fed-
eral withholding information 0N2's versus 1099's, along with the defined contribution plan for
elected officials.) The presentation regarding pay equity/comparable worth is especially important
now because the law calls for compliance by December 31, 1991. Personnel from the Internal
Revenue Service will make a presentation on payroll withholdings. You are urged to include
among your attendees the person or persons responsible for your fire department payroll because
the July 1 law regarding Social Security and Medicare will affect salaries earned by firefighters.
The social hour and dinner will begin at 6:15 p.m., followed by the evening session. LMC
President Pete Solinger will discuss the League's goals for the coming year. Included will be a
League video on 1991 legislative decisions, their effect on cities and future implications. A
discussion on the future of property tax relief funding will follow. The meeting will conclude with
door prizes, including a free registration to the 1992 annual conference June 9-12 in Bloomington.
We extend a special invitation to you to tour our new City Hall at 20195 Holyoke Ave. Tours
will be available all afternoon, beginning at 1 :30 p.m. and continuing through 4:30 p.m. A map that
points out the location of City Hall and Brackett's Crossing, along with detailed directions for
reaching Brackett's, is printed on the reverse side of this letter. To reach City Hall from 1-35, exit
on Highway 50. From Cedar Avenue, take 202nd Street west.
To make reservations for your city, please return the enclosed registration form as soon as
possible. The first 150 people to register will receive a special commemorative gift. If you must
cancel any registrations, please notify Vicki Ennenga (469-4431, extension 203) by September25.
Your city will be billed for those who do not attend and did not cancel their reservations prior to that
date. We look forward to seeing you on September 30.
rely,
M yor Duane ~~
Enclosures
City of Lakeville
20195 Holyoke Avenue. P.O. Box 957 . Lakeville, MN 55044 . (612) 469-4431 . FAX 469-3815
League of Minnesota Cities
Regional Meeting
Registration Form
---.:.- city officials from the City of will attend the
regional meeting in Lakeville on Sept. 30, 1991. We agree to pay' for these meals
unless the host city is notified of any changes by Sept. 27, 1991.
Names/titles of persons attending:
(Please print or type clearly.
Use reverse side for more names)
Person making reservation:
City:
Phone:
)
Number of attendees _ x $10.00 registration fee* = $
(*$10.00 registration fee applies only to the first
10 registrants from your city)
Number of attendees _ x $12.00 for dinner = $
TOTAL PAYMENT ENCLOSED $
Please make checks payable to City of Lakeville and return with registration form by
Sept. 25 to:
Vicki Ennenga
City of Lakeville
20195 Holyoke Ave.
P. O. Box 957
Lakeville, MN 55044
Handicap access is available. For specifIC information,
please call VICki Ennenga at 4694431.
-;;; c C-
Office of 1#/
ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
KENNETH G. WILKINSON - SHERIFF
Courthouse - 325 East Main Street - Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612-421-4760
CITY OF ANDOVER
MONTHLY CONTRACT PRODUCTIVITY REPORT
Month:
Ju1v
, 1991
This report ref 1ects the producti vi ty of the Andover contract
cars, 3125, 3135, 3145 and 3155. It does not include activity
by Sheriff's Department cars within the City during non-contract
hours, nor, activity by other Sheriff's Department cars within
the City during contract hours.
Arrests: Traffic
DWI
Arrests: Felony
G.M.
Misdemeanor
Arrests: Warrant
Papers Served
Warnings
Aids: Public
Other Agencies
TOTAL MILES PATROLLED:
Captain Len Christ
Anoka County Sheriff's Department
Patrol Division
-7-
Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
INDEPENDENT
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
(JjJ o/-3/f/
OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT
3325 Bridge Street
St. Francis, MN 55070
(612) 753-5713
TO:
Area City Councils
FROM:
J.A. Noennig, Ed. D.
Superintendent of Schools
DATE:
August 30, 1991
RE:
District 15 Facilities Committee
During the summer, the ISD 15 School Board directed me to form a
District Facilities Study Committee. They further resolved that
this committee should make a recommendation to the School Board by
May, 1992.
The goal of the committee will be to make recommendations for the
District's physical needs for its learners based on all available
information. With the most recent demographic projection
continuing to show an increase of 100 to 200 learners per year over
the next five years, the work of the committee wi 11 be both
exciting and challenging.
It is anticipated that this committee will meet throughout the
school year on a monthly or biweekly basis. While the first
meeting date has been arbitrarily selected as Monday evening,
September 30, additional meeting dates will be arrived through the
consensus of the committee.
Approximately twenty ISD 15 residents have been nominated to serve
on this committee. In addition to these individuals, we feel that
it is important that each of the cities located in ISD 15 be
represented on the committee. Therefore, we would like to ask you
to identify one of your council members that would be willing to
serve on the committee. Upon identification of that individual,
please call me at the ISD 15 District Office at 753-5713.
Thank you for your attention to this matter and I look forward to
working with a representative from your city council!
JAN/mj
ST. FRANCIS, MINNESOTA
\q~us
TEACHING & LEARNING
....,~r'...r........"""\.
,~, '1r,
./ '\
jl II
'. ,
'\... I
." .ff
"""-..,,,
CITY OF ANDOVER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE September
3, 1991
A
AGENDA SECTION
NO.
ITEM
NQ Change Order for
Timber Trails Park
Todd Haas
J)~~
ryE.,
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Engineering
BY:
The City Council is requested to approve the change order for
additional gradingof the soccer field for Timber Trails Park for
approximately 250 yards which is staff calculated to make the
site balance.
In addition, the area of the soccer fields needs to be leveled
which is a staff error on the plan sheet.
The contractor and the City staff will be working together to
determine the amount of the change order.
This authorization allows the contractor to complete the work.
(To allow time for the contractor to seed before it is too late.)
The contractor would be paid only for the extras that are above
the contractors requirements. The contractor is to be paid by
the hour for the extras.
:U
"I.-f- 'hJ e /. teed 3coc
COUNCIL ACTION
MOTION BY
TO
jYJ
SECOND BY
/Jj /0
/JUI I~ E-<Cao I> I :Jo 0